MPO Agenda 06/12/2020COLLIER COUNTY
Metropolitan Planning Organization
AGENDA
Board of County Commission Chambers
Collier County Government Center
3299 Tamiami Trail East, 3rd Floor
Naples, FL 34112
June 12, 2020
9:00 AM
Councilwoman Elaine Middelstaedt, Esq., Chair
Councilman Erik Brechnitz, Vice-Chair
Commissioner Penny Taylor
Commissioner Andy Solis, Esq.
Commissioner Burt L. Saunders
Commissioner Donna Fiala
Commissioner William L. McDaniel, Jr.
Councilman Mike McCabe
Councilman Paul Perry
This meeting of the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) is open to the public and citizen input is
encouraged. Any person wishing to speak on any scheduled item may do so upon recognition of the Chairperson.
Any person desiring to have an item placed on the agenda shall make a request in writing with a description and
summary of the item, to the MPO Director or MPO Chairman 14 days prior to the date of the next scheduled
meeting of the MPO. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of this Board will need a record of the
proceedings pertaining thereto, and therefore may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceeding is made,
which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. In accordance with the
Americans with Disabilities Act, any person requiring special accommodations to participate in this meeting
should contact Anne McLaughlin, MPO Executive Director, 72 hours prior to the meeting by calling (239) 252-
8192. The MPO’s planning process is conducted in accordance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and
Related Statutes. Any person or beneficiary who believes that within the MPO’s planning process they have been
discriminated against because of race, color, religion, sex, age, national origin, disability, or familial status may file
a complaint with the Collier MPO Executive Director, Anne McLaughlin at (239) 252 -8192 or by writing to Ms.
McLaughlin at 2885 South Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104.
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. ROLL CALL
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
4. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA, PREVIOUS MINUTES AND CONSENT ITEMS
4.A. March 13, 2020 Meeting Minutes
4.B. Amendment to the FY 18/19-19/20 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
including the De-Obligation of FY 20 Federal Planning (PL) Funds
4.C. Ratification of the Chair’s approval of a zero-dollar Change Order to PO
4500195107 for the Transit (Contract #16-6562, Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc.)
4.D. Ratification of the Chair’s approval of a zero-dollar Change Order to PO
4500193325 for the Transportation System Performance Report (Contract #16-
6562, Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc.)
4.E. Ratify the Chair’s Approval of the FY 2020/21-2021/22 Unified Planning Work
Program (UPWP) and MPO Agreement
4.F. Ratify Chair’s Approval of 2019 FDOT-MPO Joint Certification Statement
4.G. Annual Review and Adoption of the Updated Local Coordinating Board (LCB) for
the Transportation Disadvantaged (TD) By-Laws
4.H. Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor
Update
4.I. Approval of the Fiscal Year 2020/21 Transportation Disadvantage (TD) Planning
Grant
4.J. Ratification of the Community Transportation Coordinator (CTC) Local
Coordinating Board (LCB) Evaluation
5. PUBLIC COMMENTS FOR ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA
6. AGENCY UPDATES
6.A. FDOT
6.B. MPO EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
7. COMMITTEE CHAIR REPORTS
7.A. CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE (CAC)
7.A.1. Citizens Advisory Committee Chair Report
7.B. TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE (TAC)
7.B.1. Technical Advisory Committee Chair Report
7.C. BICYCLE PEDESTRIAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE (BPAC)
7.C.1. Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee Chair Report
7.D. CONGESTION MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE (CMC)
7.D.1. Congestion Management Committee Chair Report
7.E. LOCAL COORDINATING BOARD (LCB)
7.E.1. Local Coordinating Board Chair Report
8. REGULAR BOARD ACTION (ROLL CALL REQUIRED)
8.A. Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and
Authorizing Resolution
9. REGULAR BOARD ACTION (NO ROLL CALL)
9.A. Approve 2020 Priority Projects
9.B. Approve Collier County National Highway System (NHS) Justification Report and
SR 82 NHS Justification Report
9.C. Election of Representative to Serve on the Metropolitan Planning Organization
Advisory Council (MPOAC) Board for Remainder of Calendar Year 2020.
9.D. Appointment of Representative to Multi-use Corridors of Regional Economic
Significance (M-CORES) Southwest Central Florida Connector Task Force (SCFC)
9.E. Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment
9.F. Adopt the Pandemic Emergency Provisions and Authorizing Resolution
9.G. Adopt the Transportation Performance Management (TPM) Consensus Planning
Document and Authorizing Resolution
9.H. Approve Amendment to MPO Bylaws Increasing Membership on the Bicycle and
Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) from Eleven (11) to Twelve (12)
9.I. Approval of New Appointment to the Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee
(BPAC)
10. PRESENTATIONS (MAY REQUIRE BOARD ACTION)
10.A. FDOT Presentation on Strategic Intermodal System (SIS) 2045 Cost Feasible Plan
10.B. Presentation on 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) Network Scenario
Planning
11. DISTRIBUTION ITEMS
12. MEMBER COMMENTS
13. NEXT MEETING DATE
13.A. Next Meeting Date - September 11, 2020 - 9:00 a.m. Board of County
Commissioners Chambers, 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, FL 34112
14. ADJOURN
06/12/2020
COLLIER COUNTY
Metropolitan Planning Organization
Item Number: 4.A
Item Summary: March 13, 2020 Meeting Minutes
Meeting Date: 06/12/2020
Prepared by:
Title: – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Karen Intriago
06/03/2020 10:35 AM
Submitted by:
Title: Executive Director - MPO – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Anne McLaughlin
06/03/2020 10:35 AM
Approved By:
Review:
Metropolitan Planning Organization Brandy Otero MPO Analyst Review Completed 06/03/2020 10:47 AM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin MPO Executive Director Review Completed 06/03/2020 12:32 PM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin Meeting Pending 06/12/2020 9:00 AM
4.A
Packet Pg. 5
1
Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization
Board of County Commission Chambers
Collier County Government Center
3299 Tamiami Trail East, 3rd Floor
Naples, FL 34112
March 13, 2020
9:00 a.m.
1. CALL TO ORDER
Meeting was called to order at approximately 9:01 A.M.
2. ROLL CALL
Brandy Otero called roll and confirmed a quorum was present.
Members Present
Councilwoman Elaine Middelstaedt, City of Everglades City, Chair
Councilman Erik Brechnitz, City of Marco Island, Vice-Chair
Councilman Terry Hutchison, City of Naples
Commissioner Andy Solis, Collier County BCC District 2
Commissioner William L. McDaniel, Jr. District 5
Commissioner Penny Taylor, Collier County BCC District 4
Commissioner Burt Saunders, Collier County BCC District 3
Commissioner Donna Fiala, Collier County BCC District 1
Members Absent
Councilman Reg Buxton, City of Naples
MPO Staff
Anne McLaughlin, Executive Director
Brandy Otero, Principal Planner
Karen Intriago, Administrative Assistant
FDOT
L. K. Nandam, District 1 Secretary
Victoria Peters
Others Present
Wally Blaine, Tindale Oliver
Scott R. Teach, Deputy County Attorney
Lorraine Lantz, CAC Chairperson
George Dondanville, potential candidate for CAC/BPAC committees
Valerie Nowottnick, Minute Taker
4.A.1
Packet Pg. 6 Attachment: March 13, 2020 Meeting Minutes (12546 : March 13, 2020 Meeting Minutes)
2
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Commissioner Fiala led the Pledge of Allegiance.
4. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA, PREVIOUS MINUTES AND CONSENT ITEMS
4.A. Scrivener’s Error Correction - February 14, 2020 Amendment to the FY2020-
FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)
Ms. Otero – need to correct 4.B. – the amendment to the Public Transit Agreement should
now read “The Collier MPO or their designee is authorized to enter into, modify, or terminate the
PTGA with the Florida Department of Transportation unless specifically rescinded.” FDOT
requested the language to be included.
4.B. Approve Amendment to the Public Transit Grant Agreement (G1619) and the
authorizing resolution
4.C. February 14, 2020 Meeting Minutes
Councilman Brechnitz moved for approval of the Agenda, Previous Minutes, and Consent
Items. Commissioner Taylor seconded. Passed unanimously.
5. PUBLIC COMMENTS FOR ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA
None.
6. AGENCY UPDATES
6.A. FDOT
Ms. Peters – Updated Board on project located on US 41, from 951 to Greenway.
Currently in 7-day “burn period” for lighting. Waiting for final items to be reviewed and
Florida Power and Light (FPL) to give approval. Anticipate early spring for project to be
completed. Commissioner Fiala – expressed gratitude. Constituents had been asking
about status. Ms. Peters – (addressing Commissioner Solis) – re: small sidewalk project
near 91st Street. Checked with project management team and there is a little drainage being
done as well as lighting. Much smaller project in scope than Waterside Mall.
Commissioner Solis – project is going fairly quickly. Ms. Peters – (addressing
Commissioner McDaniel) – project in Immokalee on Main Street – should be starting in
May – finalizing utilities, etc.
Ms. Peters – sent out calendar invites and emails for “Southwest Connect.” (I-75
managed lane studies). Will hold two public meetings in the near future. Meetings have
been postponed for right now. The information related to meeting is not time sensitive and
studies are ongoing. Will follow up when meetings have been rescheduled. There is also
a symposium on April 23, 2020, at Tampa Campus at Univ. of South Florida. Opportunity
to share ideas for bike/ped safety.
4.A.1
Packet Pg. 7 Attachment: March 13, 2020 Meeting Minutes (12546 : March 13, 2020 Meeting Minutes)
3
6.B. MPO EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
Ms. McLaughlin – Eric Ortman accepted position with Blue Zones. Asked for
cooperation in recording motions, etc. Letter from FHWA re: upcoming certification
review. On site meeting to be held on August 12, 2020. Will also be public meeting on the
evening prior. Have coordinated with MPO Chair, Councilwoman Elaine Middelstaedt to
attend. Encourage attendance by all MPO Board members. FHWA prefers to have Board
members at their meetings. Commissioner Fiala – most Board members take vacations
in August. Ms. McLaughlin – notified FHWA that most Board members are not here in
August, and it is okay.
Ms. McLaughlin – discussed meeting requirements due to COVID-19 restrictions.
Has been in discussions with FDOT, County Attorney, and FHWA. Cannot have virtual
meetings (i.e., telephonic, televised, etc.) per Sunshine Law for either MPO Board or
advisory committees. In Public Participation Plan, there is a provision that allows going
straight to Board with matters of urgency and bypassing advisory committees. On page
25, “Exceptions to Notifications Commitments.” FHWA advised that MPO needs to
follow PPP. Proposal is to clarify that it is not just unforeseen circumstances but also
emergency situations. Advised by FWHA to change Continuity of Operations Plan
(COOP) to include emergency situations. Looking at continuing with Citizens Advisory
Committee (CAC) and Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) meetings on March 30. If
no quorum, matters would be brought directly to Board. Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory
Committee (BPAC) scheduled to meet on Tuesday, March 17. Was going to talk to them
about canceling meetings since there is no pressing business at this time. Congestion
Management Committee (CMC) is meeting next day and their information is critical to
MPO deadlines but there are alternatives to getting things done. Local Coordinating Board
(LCB) – need to talk to state Transportation Disadvantaged Commission office. Re-tooling
certain meetings to be virtual using Skype, etc. Would keep Board advised as to any
updates and changes in meeting schedules along with usage of different mediums.
Commissioner Saunders - need to address each advisory committee separately. Suggests
canceling all advisory board meetings until further notice unless something necessary to
have one. Ms. McLaughlin – CAC meeting on 03/30. Ms. Otero – two critical items
that were planned to be discussed: (1) De-obligation for the Unified Planning Work
Program (UPWP) – must be transmitted to FDOT by mid-April. If lose opportunity, then
lose funding until 2nd fiscal year. Commissioner Saunders – do you need advisory board
to meet or need their recommendation? Ms. McLaughlin – if you need to act, Board may
do so under PPP without advisory committee recommendation. Commissioner Saunders
– suggests doing so. Ms. McLaughlin – rather than addressing each committee
individually, workarounds can be developed to accommodate the slate of committee
meetings. LCB is a State-run agency and MPO will have to confer with them.
Commissioner Fiala – LCB does not meet again until May 6. Current situation may
improve by then. Councilman Brechnitz – questioned type of venue in which committees
meet (i.e., conference room, meeting room, etc.). Ms. McLaughlin – all advisory
committees meet in conference rooms in [Collier County] Growth Management Division.
People are making self-determination decisions to not be in public. BPAC member chose
4.A.1
Packet Pg. 8 Attachment: March 13, 2020 Meeting Minutes (12546 : March 13, 2020 Meeting Minutes)
4
not to attend MPO meeting. Commissioner Fiala – conference room on 5th floor of
County building may be an option. Commissioner Saunders – volunteers are sitting on
committees. Should not put them and their families at risk.
Commissioner Saunders made a motion to cancel all advisory board meetings
until further notice from MPO Board with exception that, if staff determines that a grant
or some issue must be resolved by advisory board, then the meeting could proceed. If
meeting can be avoided, and the MPO Board can make decision without their [advisory
board] input, the meetings would be canceled until further notice. Councilman Hutchison
seconded.
Mr. Nandam – if anything involves a requirement from FDOT, they can check to see if
extension can be granted so that MPO Board does not need to meet.
Mr. Teach – MPO Board previously met 1-2 fewer times per year historically. Can
compress items into other meetings. If critical items can be addressed through extension
by FDOT, MPO Board meetings can be postponed.
Ms. Otero – second critical item for CAC meeting is a change order for a contract that is
expiring at the end of April. Mr. Teach – depending on amount of change order, MPO
Board could delegate to Chair to handle. Ms. Otero – zero-dollar time extension. Mr.
Teach – Board could delegate to Chair.
Commissioner Saunders – confirmed that vote had not been taken on his motion. Will
need subsequent motion based on comments from Mr. Teach.
There being no further discussion on the motion, the vote was unanimous.
Commissioner Saunders made a motion to cancel next MPO Board meeting,
authorize staff director to deal with extension/contract issue (no cost issue), and schedule
next meeting for May 2020. Commissioner Hutchison seconded.
Commissioner Taylor – asked for amendment that any business that can be conducted
going forward through Chair or MPO [Director] needs to be addressed so that Chair can
take initiative to still accomplish task items. Commissioner Saunders – confirmed
proposed amendment as “to authorize Chairman or Vice Chairman to take whatever steps
necessary requested by staff director to continue the business of the MPO.” Approved
incorporation of language into his motion.
There being no further discussion on the motion, the vote was unanimous.
7. COMMITTEE CHAIR REPORTS
7.A. CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE (CAC)
7.A.1. Citizens Advisory Committee Chair Report
4.A.1
Packet Pg. 9 Attachment: March 13, 2020 Meeting Minutes (12546 : March 13, 2020 Meeting Minutes)
5
Ms. McLaughlin – read the Committee Chair report contained in the agenda
packet.
7.B TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE (TAC)
7.B.1. Technical Advisory Committee Chair Report
Ms. McLaughlin introduced the Committee Chair report contained in the agenda
packet. Ms. Lantz – gave overview of substance of TAC meeting on February 24,
2020. Reiterated that PSA’s from MPO should focus on roundabouts.
7.C BICYCLE PEDESTRIAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE (BPAC)
7.C.1. Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee Chair Report
Ms. McLaughlin - Committee did not meet last month.
7.D CONGESTION MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE (CMC)
7.D.1 Congestion Management Committee Chair Report
Ms. McLaughlin - Committee did not meet last month.
7.E LOCAL COORDINATING BOARD (LCB)
7.E.1 Local Coordinating Board Chair Report
Commissioner Fiala – gave report on behalf of Committee. Had a very interesting
meeting – annual public workshop. Rules changed and have created difficulties for
passengers with delays in scheduled passenger pickups, etc. Suggested
reconsideration of rules changes. Howard Kurzman elected as Vice-Chair of
Committee. Reviewed and approved LCB bylaws. Approved rate model presented
by Public Transportation and Neighborhood Enhancement Division. Next meeting
scheduled for May 6, 2020.
8. REGULAR BOARD ACTION (ROLL CALL REQUIRED)
None.
9. REGULAR BOARD ACTION (NO ROLL CALL)
9.A. Review of Draft Fiscal Year 2020/21-2021/22 Unified Planning Work Program
Ms. Otero – changes made to Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) at request of
FDOT to streamline handbook including the four State planning emphasis areas: Safety,
4.A.1
Packet Pg. 10 Attachment: March 13, 2020 Meeting Minutes (12546 : March 13, 2020 Meeting Minutes)
6
System Connectivity, Resiliency, ACES. Studies continued in UPWP: 2045 LRTP, Local
Road Safety Plan, completing Transit Development Plan, completing Park & Ride Study.
New studies: PSA/Safety Campaign (TBD) (waiting on outcome of Local Road Safety
Plan), second Transportation System Performance Report, funding allocation for two fiscal
years, new transit study (as unknown – waiting on results for Transit Development Plan).
Funding for two years: $548,485 – PL funding for 2021 (placeholder for 2021 and 2022).
Transit funding: $148,233 (typically placeholder until allocation funding received);
$27,000 – TD funding (local match included); $1,000 – local funding (items not eligible
for grant funding). Total for 2 years without soft match - $1.9M including salaries, studies,
etc. UPWP must be submitted to FDOT by March 15, 2020. FDOT will forward to FHWA
for 30-day review period. Returned to committee for final approval. Must be transmitted
to FDOT as final document no later than May 15, 2020.
Commissioner McDaniel made a motion to approve the Unified Planning Work
Program without comments. Commissioner Taylor seconded. Unanimous vote.
9.B. Approval of Appointment of Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC) Members
Ms. McLaughlin – scheduled for this meeting based on November 29, 2019, meeting vote
to seek additional applicants. Certain positions are constrained where committee members
are representing Board member jurisdictions. Vacancies in District 4 and District 5. Pam
Brown would like to fill District 5 vacant at-large position. Commissioner McDaniel –
affirmed Pam Brown to be appointed.
Ms. McLaughlin – received application from Bob Melucci for District 4. Commissioner
Taylor – support Mr. Melucci but also George Dondanville. Ms. McLaughlin – if Pam
Brown is moved to District 5, it opens an at-large position. Commissioner Taylor –
extensive discussion concerning both candidates and their involvement in the community.
Ms. McLaughlin – discussed requirements for new applicants including extending terms.
(provided map of current area volunteer representation). Commissioner Middelstaedt –
not enough information to make a decision. Commissioner McDaniel – suggested Ms.
Rosenfeld be added as at-large member. Commissioner Taylor – candidates are typically
allowed interviews and potential member is available for interview. Mr. Dondanville – is
amenable to being appointed to either committee (CAC or BPAC). Lengthy and extensive
discussions among Board and Executive Director regarding District vacancies, applicants,
term extensions, expansion of advisory committees to accommodate additional applicants,
etc.
Commissioner Taylor nominated two applicants for the BPAC committee: Bob
Melucci for District 4 and George Dondanville as at-large for CAC. Commissioner Solis
amended nomination to include Mr. DiDonna for at-large in District 2. Commissioner
Taylor further amended the motion to include extending expiring terms for Josh Rincon,
Robert Phelan, and relocating Pam Brown to District 5. Commissioner Solis seconded.
Unanimous vote.
4.A.1
Packet Pg. 11 Attachment: March 13, 2020 Meeting Minutes (12546 : March 13, 2020 Meeting Minutes)
7
9.C. Approval of Appointments to the Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee
(BPAC)
Ms. McLaughlin – vote taken in November to move future committee
appointments into regular action. Current membership is included in agenda packet as
attachment 1. Advertised committee on social media, website, and listservs. Kim Jacobs
(Naples Park), Patti Huff (Everglades City), George Dondanville (City of Naples)
submitted applications. Expiring terms: Joe Bonness, Dana Fendrick, Reginald Wilson,
Alan Musico, Dr. Friedman. All committee members are at-large. Discussed each
committee member’s qualifications and requirements under the bylaws. Referenced map
showing current representations per District. Recommends extending current terms.
Commissioner Solis – suggests that new members are encouraged for fresh ideas and
perspectives. Extensive discussion concerning length of current appointments and length
of time on committee for current members. Commissioner Taylor – suggests replacing
people chronologically beginning with longest serving. Councilwoman Middelstaedt –
there was discussion about possibly expanding the committee under the bylaws.
Councilman Brechnitz – agrees with bringing in new members but institutional
knowledge should be a consideration before replacing members. Agrees with expanding
the committee size under the bylaws. Strongly supports Alan Musico. Brief discussion
continued among members regarding current committee members.
Commissioner McDaniel moved to accept staff recommendation for the extension
of the existing members [terms] as was recommended along with the adjustment to bylaws
to expand the membership and bring back those who applied for due consideration in a
future scheduled meeting.
Councilwoman Middelstaedt – confirmed that Victor Ordija is not returning to
the committee after his term expires on May 31, 2020. His departure will create a vacancy.
Commissioner Saunders – clarified the motion that it directed staff to increase
membership on the committee and there was one position available. Suggested amending
the motion to direct staff to amend bylaws to increase committee by one position,
appointment applicant to position, and staff can take necessary action rather than waiting
until May when Board meets again.
Brief discussion regarding size of committee, quorum requirements, consultation with
County Attorney’s Office to expand bylaws, etc.
Commissioner McDaniel’s motion was amended to include directive to Executive
Director and staff to amend bylaws to allow for an increase in committee members by one
position, to allow staff to fill both positions, and to take any action that is necessary to
resolve any vacancies prior to the Board’s next scheduled meeting. Commissioner Solis
seconded. Passed unanimously.
10. PRESENTATIONS (MAY REQUIRE BOARD ACTION)
4.A.1
Packet Pg. 12 Attachment: March 13, 2020 Meeting Minutes (12546 : March 13, 2020 Meeting Minutes)
8
10.A. Transportation System Performance Report Update
Ms. Otero – provided update on Transportation System Performance Report. First report
for program. Required every 2 years. Introduced Wally Blaine with Tindall Oliver. Mr.
Blaine – gave lengthy presentation via PowerPoint concerning TSPR including objectives,
proposed timeline for completion, etc. 8-step process required by Federal government.
Congestion Management Process (CMP) is initial step. 2017 CMP discusses highly
congestive conditions compared against national examples. Step 1 recommends
supporting LRTP, integrating Congestion Management Process, connect bike/ped facilities
to existing and future transit stops, encouraging alternative modes of transportation,
including movement of goods, and improving safety of transportation facilities. Objectives
were approved and endorsed by committee. Step 2 is to define CMP network, review
current and committed conditions (TIP) and estimation of traffic growth. Map shows
existing plus committed projects. Steps 3 and 4 pertain to performance measures.
Reviewed 2017 CMP performance measures and recommending additional measures to
include in TSP and objectives are linked to CMP. Step 5 is analyzing recurring v. non-
recurring congestion issues. Used traditional approach related to congestion – showed
projections on displayed map. City of Naples wants lower standard for congestion when
planning for roads. Newer approach relies upon speed-based results using sensors. Used
map to demonstrate differences between speeds and time. Mentioned collaboration with
School Board and addressing schools with high congestion areas. Will work with
Congestion Management Committee (CMC) to gather data and incorporate it into future
reports. Additional public outreach and to possibly arrange a virtual meeting based on
current COVID-19 circumstances. Also commented on social media outreach successful
campaigns with both news media and County Facebook page along with emails.
Approximately 2700 surveys have been completed thus far. Concentration of largest
participants is Golden Gate Estates area. Preliminary survey results indicate that seasonal
traffic is highest concern. Survey question concerning alternative transportation results:
48.70% for public transportation; 50.99% for telecommuting; 46.11% for flexible hours
outside of typical hours. Steps 6, 7, and 8, pertain to identifying congested areas,
conducting studies at intersections in conjunction with LRTP, and evaluating strategies
once they have become implemented.
Commissioner Middelstaedt – acknowledged completing the survey and appreciated the
content.
Mr. Nandam – discussed alternative opportunities that could be a solution for
transportation management including partnerships with bringing inter-modal solutions.
Suggests bringing the Transit Development Plan (TDP) at the same time as the discussion
on the LRTP. Also suggested using flexible funds to mitigate transportation funding prior
to finalization of LRTP. FDOT staff develops strategic plans first within each District and
identify strategies to bring transit as a potential solution for condition management. Look
at pilot projects and engage with transit agencies, along with the MPO, so resources can be
engaged.
Commissioner Taylor – appreciates FDOT’s advocacy and explanation.
4.A.1
Packet Pg. 13 Attachment: March 13, 2020 Meeting Minutes (12546 : March 13, 2020 Meeting Minutes)
9
10.B. Update on 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)
Ms. McLaughlin – gave update on LRTP using PowerPoint with tasks completed, external
stations growth rate projections, schedule for developing model, next steps specifying
consultants/technical reports/alternative 1 cost feasible network scenario. If additional
model run is required, it would be due on April 15, 2020. It would be returned on May 1,
2020. Upcoming public meeting of Golden Gate Estates Area Community Association
(GGEACA) scheduled for March 18, 2020 was canceled. No word yet on Immokalee
Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) meeting scheduled for March 18, 2020.
Commissioner McDaniel – made motion earlier to cancel advisory committees despite
specific due dates for certain projects. Queried about direction from FDOT regarding
extension of timeframes to accommodate cancelation of meetings. Mr. Nandam –
requirements are from FHWA. FDOT will be having conversations with representatives.
Will keep Board apprised of the outcomes.
10.C. Local Roads Safety Plan Update
Ms. McLaughlin – gave update on LRSP. Focusing on reducing fatalities and serious
injuries on highways and local public roads. Developing framework for public outreach
and recommendations. Project team is coordinating with advisory committees. Brief
discussion regarding staff efforts on different platforms for collecting data. Explained the
“4 E’s” of transportation safety: (1) Engineering; (2) Education; (3) Enforcement; (4)
Emergency Response.
Commissioner Fiala – inquired about whether data from prior red light cameras (when
they were in effect) was used or consulted when conducting investigations. Ms.
McLaughlin – nationally, red light cameras were very effective in encouraging citizens to
obey traffic laws. Not familiar with data on local roads. Commissioner McDaniel –
constituent asked about red light cameras at recent citizen meeting he attended. Mentioned
that Washington DC has them and acknowledged that privacy issues exist with using them
but thought they should be explored. Mr. Teach – mentioned that Transportation Engineer
did a presentation for Collier County when red light cameras were eliminated and that
statistical data is probably available. Brief discussion ensued with Board members
regarding issues with using cameras historically.
11. DISTRIBUTION ITEMS
11.A. Metropolitan Planning Organization Advisory Council (MPOAC) Legislative
Newsletter(s)
12. MEMBER COMMENTS
Commissioner Taylor – (1) would like report on developing and/or expanding transit
network within Collier County. (2) Can transit be coordinated with Lee County.
4.A.1
Packet Pg. 14 Attachment: March 13, 2020 Meeting Minutes (12546 : March 13, 2020 Meeting Minutes)
10
Additional comments regarding how to handle meetings with constituents and County
employees (including handing out proclamations and awards) during COVID-19 crisis.
Commissioner Saunders – County Commissioners said no further physical contact (i.e.,
shaking hands, bumping elbows, etc.). Also declined to hand out awards for the immediate
future. Leaders should set the example for social distancing. Constituent meetings will be
conducted via telephone now. No public events. Individual choice. Brief discussion
among Board members regarding concerns involving personal meetings (i.e., church
meetings, party, grocery store, etc.). Councilman Brechnitz – should listen to health
professionals but should not shut down entire economy. Agree that it will get worse and
compared current pandemic to flu. Commissioner Fiala – have rescheduled tours to
prevent large gatherings. Commissioner McDaniel – agrees with Commissioner
Saunders and it is a personal choice. County Fair and Cattle Drive are still moving
forward.
Commissioner Solis – inquired about proclamations and suggested that Gary Shirk should
receive one for his term on the BPAC.
Commissioner Solis moved to award a proclamation to retiring member Gary
Shirk in appreciation for his term on the CAC. Commissioner Fiala seconded. Passed
unanimously.
Councilman Hutchison – wished everyone health during this crisis and encouraged
people to go out and support their local small businesses.
Councilwoman Middelstaedt – Everglades City opened brand new visitor center at 207
Broadway South. Opening was February 1 and was very well attended. Good attendance
until COVID-19 issue. Encourages people to attend the visitor center.
13. NEXT MEETING DATE
13.A. ** All future meetings have been canceled until further notice.
14. ADJOURN
Meeting was adjourned at approximately 11:15 a.m.
4.A.1
Packet Pg. 15 Attachment: March 13, 2020 Meeting Minutes (12546 : March 13, 2020 Meeting Minutes)
06/12/2020
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Amendment to the FY 18/19-19/20 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) including the De-
Obligation of FY 20 Federal Planning (PL) Funds
OBJECTIVE: For the Board to ratify the Chair’s approval of an amendment to the FY 18/19 -19/20
UPWP including the de-obligation of FY 20 Federal Planning Funds (PL) in the amount of $83,588.
CONSIDERATIONS: The Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) provides a planning work
program that identifies and describes the MPO’s budget for activities, studies and technical support
expected to be undertaken in the metropolitan area on behalf of the MPO Board. It also lists the funding
source(s) for each planning task and specifies whether the task will be conducted by MPO staff,
consultants or county agencies.
Before the end of year two, a MPO must unencumber and de-obligate any funds it wishes to be available
in year one of the next adopted two-year UPWP. This action must be taken prior to April 15th and
transmitted to FDOT before May 1st. The breakdown of the de-obligation request is shown in
Attachment 1. The amendment pages of the UPWP are shown in strikethrough/underline format in
Attachment 2. In addition to the decrease in funding, the revisions include:
Extending the completion date of the Transportation System Performance Report to
December 2020
Extending the completion date of the Strategic Highway Safety Plan (now the Local
Road Safety Plan) to December 2020
Extending the completion date of the Major Transit Development Plan to September
2020
Extending the completion date of the Transit Impact Analysis to December 2020
Extending the completion date of the Park and Ride Study to December 2020
Reallocating $19,000 from Task 2 and $9,000 from Task 3 to Task 1
Revising the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) soft match amount
Updating budget tables
Upon approval of the amendment to the UPWP, the MPO Agreement for PL funding will be amended
and updated accordingly. The Amendment to the MPO Agreement is included as Attachment 3. The
resolution approving revisions to both documents is included as Attachment 4. Pursuant to the MPO’s
Public Involvement Plan, the UPWP Amendment was distributed for review and comment via e -mail and
was announced on the MPO’s website. The public comment period began on March 24th and ends on
April 3rd. No public comments were received.
Due to Covid-19, there was not a MPO Board meeting in April. The MPO Board gave the Chair the
authority to approve the de-obligation and associated amendment to the MPO Agreement in the Board’s
absence. The Chair approved this item on April 10, 2020 and signed all associated documents.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: Due to COVID-19, the Technical Advisory Committee
(TAC) and Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC) meetings were canceled. The item was sent to advisory
committee members with a request to provide comments to staff. No comments were received from
committee members.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the Board ratify the approval of the amendment to the FY 18/19-
19/20 UPWP including the de-obligation of FY 20 Federal Planning Funds (PL) in the amount of
4.B
Packet Pg. 16
06/12/2020
$83,588.
Prepared By: Brandy Otero, Collier MPO Principal Planner
ATTACHMENT(S)
1. Breakdown of De-obligation request (PDF)
2. Revised pages from the FY 16/17-17/18 UPWP (PDF)
3. Amendment to the MPO Agreement (PDF)
4. Resolution 2020-03 (PDF)
4.B
Packet Pg. 17
06/12/2020
COLLIER COUNTY
Metropolitan Planning Organization
Item Number: 4.B
Doc ID: 12547
Item Summary: Amendment to the FY 18/19-19/20 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
including the De-Obligation of FY 20 Federal Planning (PL) Funds
Meeting Date: 06/12/2020
Prepared by:
Title: – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Karen Intriago
06/03/2020 10:27 AM
Submitted by:
Title: Executive Director - MPO – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Anne McLaughlin
06/03/2020 10:27 AM
Approved By:
Review:
Metropolitan Planning Organization Brandy Otero MPO Analyst Review Completed 06/03/2020 10:46 AM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin MPO Executive Director Review Completed 06/03/2020 12:34 PM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin Meeting Pending 06/12/2020 9:00 AM
4.B
Packet Pg. 18
Task Budget De-Obligation Revised Budget Reallocation Final Budget
Task 1 - Administration 299,185.00$ 299,185.00$ 28,900.00$ 328,085.00$
Task 2 - Data Collection/ Development 20,000.00$ 20,000.00$ (19,000.00)$ 1,000.00$
Task 3 - Transportation Improvement Program 15,000.00$ (4,600.00)$ 10,400.00$ (9,900.00)$ 500.00$
Task 4 - Long Range Planning 323,803.00$ (28,000.00)$ 295,803.00$ 295,803.00$
Task 5 - Special Projects and Systems Planning 152,000.00$ (29,988.00)$ 122,012.00$ 122,012.00$
Task 7 - Regional Coordination 30,000.00$ (21,000.00)$ 9,000.00$ 9,000.00$
Total fiscal year 2019/20 funds for all tasks 839,988.00$ (83,588.00)$ 756,400.00$ -$ 756,400.00$
Task 1 Line items Budget De-Obligation Revised Budget Reallocation Final Budget
ADM Personnel 243,935.00$ 243,935.00$ 54,100.00$ 298,035.00$
ADM Consultant 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$
ADM Travel & Development 4,000.00$ 4,000.00$ (2,500.00)$ 1,500.00$
ADM Other Building Rent/Lease 14,000.00$ 14,000.00$ 14,000.00$
ADM Other Insurance 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ (3,500.00)$ 1,500.00$
ADM Cell Access 750.00$ 750.00$ (400.00)$ 350.00$
ADM Other Copying/Print/R&M 14,000.00$ 14,000.00$ (8,500.00)$ 5,500.00$
ADM Other Office Supplies 4,000.00$ 4,000.00$ (2,800.00)$ 1,200.00$
ADM Other Legal Ads 3,000.00$ 3,000.00$ (2,900.00)$ 100.00$
ADM Other Motor Pool/Auto 4,500.00$ 4,500.00$ 4,500.00$
ADM Other Postage/Freight 4,000.00$ 4,000.00$ (3,800.00)$ 200.00$
ADM Other Phone Systems 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ (800.00)$ 200.00$
Totals 299,185.00$ 299,185.00$ 28,900.00$ 328,085.00$
Task 2 Line items Budget De-Obligation Revised Budget Reallocation Final Budget
DC&D Personnel 10,000.00$ 10,000.00$ (9,500.00)$ 500.00$
DC&D Consultant 10,000.00$ 10,000.00$ (9,500.00)$ 500.00$
Totals 20,000.00$ 20,000.00$ (19,000.00)$ 1,000.00$
Task 3 Line items Budget De-Obligation Revised Budget Reallocation Final Budget
TIP Personnel 15,000.00$ (4,600.00)$ 10,400.00$ (9,900.00)$ 500.00$
Totals 15,000.00$ (4,600.00)$ 10,400.00$ (9,900.00)$ 500.00$
Task 4 Line items Budget De-Obligation Revised Budget Reallocation Final Budget
LRTP Personnel 30,000.00$ (28,000.00)$ 2,000.00$ 2,000.00$
LRTP Consultant PL 293,803.00$ 293,803.00$ 293,803.00$
Totals 323,803.00$ (28,000.00)$ 295,803.00$ 295,803.00$
Task 5 Line items Budget De-Obligation Revised Budget Reallocation Final Budget
SPSP Personnel 50,000.00$ (27,000.00)$ 23,000.00$ 23,000.00$
SPSP Transportation System Perf Rprt18-2 97,000.00$ (2,988.00)$ 94,012.00$ 94,012.00$
SPSP Strategic Highway Safety Plan 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$
Totals 152,000.00$ (29,988.00)$ 122,012.00$ 122,012.00$
Task 7 Line items Budget De-Obligation Revised Budget Reallocation Final Budget
RC Personnel 25,000.00$ (21,000.00)$ 4,000.00$ 4,000.00$
RC Travel 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$
Totals 30,000.00$ (21,000.00)$ 9,000.00$ 9,000.00$
(83,588.00)$ 756,400.00$ -$ 756,400.00$
SU Funding Budget De-Obligation Revised Budget Reallocation Final Budget
LRTP Consultant SU 200,000.00$ (120,000.00)$ 80,000.00$ 80,000.00$
Strategic Highway Safety Plan SU 200,000.00$ (65,000.00)$ 135,000.00$ 135,000.00$
400,000.00$ (185,000.00)$ 215,000.00$ 215,000.00$
Revised FY 19/20 Funding
4.B.1
Packet Pg. 19 Attachment: Breakdown of De-obligation request (12547 : Amendment to the FY 18/19-19/20 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) including
COLLIER
METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION
Bonita Springs (Naples), FL UZA
FISCAL YEARS (FY) 2018/19-2019/20
UNIFIED PLANNING WORK PROGRAM
This document was approved and adopted by the
Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization on
Approved and Adopted May 11, 2018
_________________________________________
Commissioner William L. McDaniel, Jr.
MPO Chair
Prepared by:
Staff and the participating agencies of the
Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization
2885 Horseshoe Drive South, Naples, Florida 34104
(239) 252-5804
Fax: (239) 252-5815
Collier.mpo@colliercountyfl.gov
http://www.colliermpo.com
The preparation of this document has been financed in part through grants from
the Federal Highway Administration (CFDA Number 20.205),
the Federal Transit Administration (CFDA Number 20.505),
the U.S. Department of Transportation, under the Metropolitan Planning Program,
Section 104(f) of title 23, U.S. Code,
and from Local funding provided by Collier County, the
City of Naples, the City of Marco Island, and the City of Everglades City.
The contents of this document do not necessarily reflect the official
views or policy of the U.S. Department of Transportation.
Federal Planning Funds
Federal Aid Program (FAP) - # PL0313 (056)
Financial Management (FM) - # 439314-2-14-01 & 439314-2-01-04
FDOT Contract # GOY70
Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Section 5305(d) Funds
Financial Management (FM) - # 410113 1 14
Contract # GO581
Amendment 1: April 12, 2019 Amendment 4: October 11, 2019
Amendment 2: May 10, 2019 Amendment 5: November 8, 2019
Modification 3: May 30, 2019 Amendment 6: April 10, 2020
4.B.2
Packet Pg. 20 Attachment: Revised pages from the FY 16/17-17/18 UPWP (12547 : Amendment to the FY 18/19-19/20 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
vi
COST ANALYSIS CERTIFICATION
4.B.2
Packet Pg. 21 Attachment: Revised pages from the FY 16/17-17/18 UPWP (12547 : Amendment to the FY 18/19-19/20 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
vii
4.B.2
Packet Pg. 22 Attachment: Revised pages from the FY 16/17-17/18 UPWP (12547 : Amendment to the FY 18/19-19/20 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
viii
INTRODUCTION
The Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) for the Collier Metropolitan Planning Area documents
transportation planning and transportation planning related activities for FY 2018/19-2019/20. The
objective of this work program is to ensure that a continuing, cooperative and comprehensive approach to
planning for transportation needs is maintained and properly coordinated with other jurisdictions and MPOs,
the Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council (SWFRPC) and the Florida Department of Transportation
(FDOT).
Comments received from FHWA, FTA, and FDOT have been addressed and incorporated into the final
document. A draft of this UPWP was presented for final endorsement to the Citizens and Technical
Advisory Committees on April 30, 2018 and received final approval by the Collier MPO Board on May 11,
2018.
This document is intended to inform all public officials and agencies that contribute effort and allocated
funds to the multimodal transportation planning process about the nature of the tasks identified in the UPWP.
It is also intended to assign specific responsibilities for the various tasks to the participating agencies in
accordance with the Interlocal Agreement creating the Metropolitan Planning Organization. In addition, the
UPWP provides the basis for Federal funding of the transportation planning activities to be undertaken with
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and Federal Transit Administration (FTA) funds.
MPO planning principles, procedures and technical issues in the UPWP are intended to be an integral part
of the planning process and bring about improved decision making in transportation project selection,
development, design, mitigation and construction. The level of effort in this UPWP is largely based on
state and federal requirements, joint efforts with planning partners that support the transportation planning
process, and the cycle of updates to the Long Range Transportation Plan.
Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century (MAP-21) maintains the federal planning factors that were
included in the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users
(SAFETEA-LU). In addition, the new transportation authorization bill, Fixing America’s Surface
Transportation (FAST) added two planning factors. The following ten federal planning factors have been
incorporated into the MPO Planning Process and this UPWP:
1. Support the economic vitality of the metropolitan area, especially by enabling global
competitiveness, productivity, and efficiency;
2. Increase the safety of the transportation system for motorized and non-motorized users;
3. Increase the security of the transportation system for motorized and non-motorized users;
4. Increase the accessibility and mobility of people and for freight;
5. Protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, improve the quality of life,
and promote consistency between transportation improvements and State and local planned
growth and economic development patterns;
6. Enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system, across and between
modes, for people and freight;
7. Promote efficient system management and operation;
8. Improve the resiliency and reliability of the transportation system and reduce or mitigate
stormwater impacts of surface transportation;
4.B.2
Packet Pg. 23 Attachment: Revised pages from the FY 16/17-17/18 UPWP (12547 : Amendment to the FY 18/19-19/20 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
ix
INTRODUCTION (cont.)
9. Enhance travel and tourism; and,
10. Emphasize the preservation of the existing transportation system
In addition to the planning factors noted above, MAP-21 required that State DOTs and MPOs conduct
performance-based planning by tracking performance measures and setting data-driven targets to improve
those measures. Performance-based planning ensures the most efficient investment of federal transportation
funds by increasing accountability, transparency, and providing for better investment decisions that focus
on key outcomes related to seven national goals which include:
• Improving Safety;
• Maintaining Infrastructure Condition;
• Reducing Traffic Congestion;
• Improving the Efficiency of the System and Freight Movement;
• Protecting the Environment; and,
• Reducing Delays in Project Delivery.
The FAST Act supplements the MAP-21 legislation by establishing timelines for State DOTs and MPOs to
comply with the requirements of MAP-21. State DOTs are required to establish statewide targets and MPOs
have the option to support the statewide targets or adopt their own. The transition to performance based
planning is being addressed within the tasks identified in this UPWP. The Collier MPO intends to
coordinate with FDOT and member agencies to fully comply with the performance based planning
requirements.
The MPO performs a variety of tasks utilizing funds under Titles 23 and 49, U.S.C. Those tasks include
annual development of the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP); continually improving the
Congestion Management System; regular updates to the Transit Development Plan (TDP) and
Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP); assisting Collier County in its role as Transportation
Disadvantaged Community Transportation Coordinator (CTC); support of Bicycle and Pedestrian Planning
activities; preparation of updates to the Long Range Transportation Plan; periodically updating the Public
Involvement Plan (PIP), expanding public outreach activities and implementing strategies to address
environmental justice issues; and supporting FDOT District One and Collier County planning activities with
emphasis on improving traffic modeling and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) capabilities.
Section 120 of Title 23, U.S.C, permits a state to use certain toll revenue expenditures as a credit toward the
non-federal matching share of all programs authorized by Title 23, (with the exception of Emergency Relief
Programs) and for transit programs authorized by Chapter 53 of Title 49, U.S.C. This is in essence a “soft-
match” provision that allows the federal share to be increased up to 100% to the extent credits are available.
The “soft-match” amount being utilized to match the FHWA funding in this UPWP is 18.07% of FHWA
program funds for a total of $156,456 in FY 2018/19 and $166,828 in FY 2019/20 for a total of $323,284.
Deleted: 185,262
Deleted: 341,718
4.B.2
Packet Pg. 24 Attachment: Revised pages from the FY 16/17-17/18 UPWP (12547 : Amendment to the FY 18/19-19/20 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
1
COLLIER
METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION
FY 2018/19-2019/20
UNIFIED PLANNING WORK PROGRAM (UPWP)
4.B.2
Packet Pg. 25 Attachment: Revised pages from the FY 16/17-17/18 UPWP (12547 : Amendment to the FY 18/19-19/20 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
2
TASK 1 ADMINISTRATION
4.B.2
Packet Pg. 26 Attachment: Revised pages from the FY 16/17-17/18 UPWP (12547 : Amendment to the FY 18/19-19/20 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
3
ADMINISTRATION
PURPOSE:
To conduct activities (including staff travel and capital expenses) including the development and
maintenance of administrative reports and grants contract administration. This task also includes all
public involvement activities and administrative support for MPO planning and programs in general,
including assistance to Federal, State and local agency staff, as needed. It provides for the
administration of the area-wide multimodal transportation planning process in accordance with Federal
and State requirements, and for the technical management over each project included in the UPWP.
PREVIOUS WORK:
• Staff Management
• UPWP development and Amendments
• Annual and Quadrennial MPO Certifications
• Quarterly Reports and Invoices
• Grant Applications, Contracts, Joint Participation Agreements, and Budget Submittals
• Audits as required
• Legal services for MPO
• Purchase, lease or rent for MPO staff offices, vehicle, facilities and equipment
• Copies
• COOP
• Published MPO newsletters
• Developed and maintained an interactive stand-alone Website
• Staff spoke before groups and organizations
• Staff issued press releases and legal ads
• Participated in interviews by local print and broadcast media
• Public Involvement activities
• Provided information to the public, consultants and other government agencies by mail, phone
and e-mail.
REQUIRED ACTIVITIES:
• Manage in-house staff and consultants to accomplish all planning tasks.
• General administration and coordination of the MPO and MPO activities required to facilitate
the UPWP and planning tasks per federal and state planning requirements.
• Maintain and update a General Planning Contract for planning tasks and issue purchase orders,
work orders or necessary authorizations under contracts associated with the General Planning
Contract or future planning contracts.
• Preparation of contracts, request for proposals and agreements between the MPO and
participating agencies, including contracts with outside consultants.
• Technical assistance to local governments, public agencies, and other qualified grant sponsors
regarding Federal and state grant applications or management issues.
4.B.2
Packet Pg. 27 Attachment: Revised pages from the FY 16/17-17/18 UPWP (12547 : Amendment to the FY 18/19-19/20 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
4
• General facilitation, coordination and minute / record keeping of all MPO Board, advisory
committee meetings, and any other public meetings or workshops. This includes legal ads and
notices, scheduling the meetings, facility rentals, assembling and delivering the agendas /
packets, transcribing the minutes, etc.
• Complete press releases, legal ads, advertisements, fliers, notices, etc. for meetings,
transportation plans and MPO related activities.
• MPO Board, committee members and staff to participate in transportation workshops,
conferences, meetings and coordination activities to provide staff, board, and committee
members training and education, about the MPO and to enhance knowledge in any UPWP task,
maintain technical expertise, promote sound transportation planning, and stay abreast of
emerging issues. This includes purchase of any necessary resource and training materials.
Travel may be required for these activities.
• Participate in any air quality compliance training and related air quality regulations (as
necessary).
• Soliciting applications for vacancies on advisory committees, as needed.
• Updating of MPO and advisory committee bylaws, as needed.
• Contracting with outside legal counsel as necessary for contracts, agreements, and procedural
assessments.
• Contractual lease or rent for MPO staff offices, facilities, vehicle and equipment, if applicable.
• Monitor progress towards goals, including Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) goals.
Ensure compliance with DBE policy.
• Assist Collier County with MPO budget, grant compliance and annual audit as necessary.
Ensure all MPO Board Members receive a copy of the annual audit.
• Drafting or updating any necessary agreements, resolutions or documents including but not
limited to the reapportionment plan, interlocal agreements and coordination agreements.
• Pursue new grant opportunities as they arise to support transportation and related planning.
• Payment of professional membership dues for planning, such as AICP, engineering, such as
EIT and ITS, and appropriate legal organizations.
• Purchase of all routine / necessary office supplies for the MPO.
• Printing expenses, either in house or through a vendor.
• Purchase or lease the necessary office equipment such as computers / laptops / monitors / color
copiers / printers / scanners / fax machines / iPads / Tablets (or equivalent) / audiovisual aids
in order to enhance MPO documentation and communication.
• Software license and maintenance agreements, including but not limited to computer operating
systems, Adobe Professional and ArcGIS.
• Maintenance fees from the Collier County Information Technology department (IT) for help
desk support and maintenance of MPO computers and related hardware/software, as necessary.
• Develop/update/revise/amend FY 2018/19-2019/20 Unified Planning Work Program.
• Develop an Annual Report to report on annual activities of staff and advisory committees,
incorporating PIP statistics, performance measures and the Board’s strategic plan.
• Develop annual reports for FHWA, FDOT, and other member governments, as requested.
• Continue to coordinate with FDOT and partner agencies to address and implement performance
measures as required.
• Coordinate with FDOT and member agencies to address integration of MAP-21 and FAST
Performance Management Measures in an effort to move towards performance based planning.
4.B.2
Packet Pg. 28 Attachment: Revised pages from the FY 16/17-17/18 UPWP (12547 : Amendment to the FY 18/19-19/20 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
5
• Assess progress towards meeting UPWP objectives, project end dates and budget targets.
• Preparation of documents necessary to maintain the Federal and state certification of the Collier
MPO’s metropolitan multimodal transportation planning process (MMTPP) and the related
requirements associated with Federal funding and the planning process. This includes the
preparation of quarterly invoices and an Annual Summary Report to ensure compliance with
any federal or state regulations.
• Maintain and update the Continuity of Operations Plan (COOP) or other disaster preparedness
procedures and conduct a COOP preparedness training / exercise, as necessary.
• Review, update and distribution of MPO’s Public Involvement Plan (PIP), LEP and the Joint
Regional PIP.
• Ongoing Title VI & Environmental Justice evaluations including updating the complaint
process and resolving complaints, as necessary.
• Document measures of effectiveness for the PIP.
• Complete MPO/project newsletters, fliers, and outreach materials to educate the public.
• Provides staff for information booths at community events and business trade fairs.
• Ongoing development, update and maintenance/enhancement of MPO website, social media
and networking media to engage the public, gain public input and provide document
availability, such as the QRC.
• Provide, conduct and review public involvement surveys and responses and public comment
periods.
• Ongoing development and maintenance of mailing and community contact lists to ensure
adequate notice of public meetings and distribution of public information materials.
• Payment of all postage, FedEx and routine / necessary office supplies for the MPO.
• Consultant assistance as required.
END PRODUCT: (TARGET DATE)
• Quarterly progress reports and invoices. (quarterly)
• Certification documentation, Agreements, Resolutions
and JPAs. (annually)
• Annual Audit distribution (annually)
• Compliance with DBE Policy and reporting requirements. (as needed)
• Press releases and solicitation for vacancies on advisory committees. (as needed)
• Monthly agenda packets for advisory committees and the MPO Board (monthly)
• Press releases or legal ads for advisory committee meetings, MPO
Board meetings and any other meetings or special workshops/events (monthly/ as needed)
• Annual summary of activities. (as needed)
• Pursue a MPO Internship Program (as necessary)
• Air quality compliance and regulation training (as necessary)
• Title VI training. (as necessary)
• FSUTMS training. (as necessary)
• GIS training (as necessary)
• Professional development training and workshops. (as necessary)
• Office Lease and usage of car from Collier County Fleet Management for
$735 per quarter and an additional rate of $0.49 per mile over 1,500 miles (quarterly)
4.B.2
Packet Pg. 29 Attachment: Revised pages from the FY 16/17-17/18 UPWP (12547 : Amendment to the FY 18/19-19/20 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
6
• Office equipment lease (monthly)
• 2018/19-2019/20 Unified Planning Work Program updates (as needed)
• Draft 2020/21 – 2021/22 Unified Planning Work Program (7th quarter)
• Continuity of Operations Plan (COOP) or other disaster
preparedness procedures. (ongoing)
• MPO committee and Board member orientation. (as needed)
• Minutes of MPO Board and Advisory Committees and
associated subcommittee meetings. (monthly)
• Agendas for the MPO Board and associated
Advisory Committees. (Monthly)
• MPO newsletters. (semi-annually)
• Updated MPO website and web pages (ongoing)
• Information about MPO events and workshops. (ongoing)
• Timely response to all information requests. (ongoing)
• Public Involvement Plan (PIP) and Evaluation Guide (as necessary)
• Published list of projects for which Federal funds are
obligated in the preceding year, and make available for public review. (annually)
• Annual Report (annually)
• Presentations for MPO committees, Board members and the public
regarding the LRTP, TIP, UPWP and other plans (as needed)
• Updates to the Limited English Proficiency (LEP) Plan. (as needed)
• Updates to the community outreach tools to identify Environmental (as needed)
Justice and Title VI populations
• Public involvement documents in accordance with the PIP (ongoing)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY:
FY 2018/19
Collier MPO FHWA (PL) $315,000
Consultant Services
FY 2019/20
Collier MPO FHWA (PL) $328,085
Consultant Services
Deleted: 299,185
4.B.2
Packet Pg. 30 Attachment: Revised pages from the FY 16/17-17/18 UPWP (12547 : Amendment to the FY 18/19-19/20 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
7
Task 1 - Financial Tables
Task 1 - Administration
Estimated Budget Detail for FY 2018/19
Budget
Category
Budget Category
Description
FHWA FHWA FTA FTA State
Match
FTA Local
Match
Trans.
Disad. Total
(PL) (SU) 5303
A. Personnel Services
MPO staff salaries, fringe benefits, and other deductions $244,750 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $244,750
Subtotal: $244,750 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $244,750
B. Consultant Services
Website maintenance, hosting fees, etc. $20,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $20,000
Subtotal: $20,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $20,000
C. Travel
Travel and Professional Development $4,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,000
Subtotal: $4,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,000
D. Other Direct Expenses
Building or room Rental/lease $14,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $14,000
Insurance $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,000
Cellular Telephone Access and expenses $750 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $750
General Copying Expenses, equipment lease, printing charges, repairs and maintenance $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,000
General Office Supplies $4,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,000
Legal Advertising $3,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,000
Motor Pool Rental and Car Maintenance /expenses $4,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,500
Postage, business reply permit, freight expenses, etc. $4,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,000
Telephone Access, expenses and system maintenance $1,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,000
Subtotal: $46,250 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $46,250
Total: $315,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $315,000
4.B.2
Packet Pg. 31 Attachment: Revised pages from the FY 16/17-17/18 UPWP (12547 : Amendment to the FY 18/19-19/20 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
8
Task 1 - Administration
Estimated Budget Detail for FY 2019/20
Budget Category &
Description
FHWA FHWA FTA FTA
State
Match
FTA
Local
Match
Trans.
Disad. Total (PL) (SU) 5303
A. Personnel Services MPO staff salaries, fringe benefits, and other deductions $298,035 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $298,035
Subtotal: $298,035 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $298,035
B. Consultant Services Website maintenance, hosting fees, etc. $1,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,000
Subtotal: $1,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,000
C. Travel Travel and Professional Development $1,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,500
Subtotal: $1,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,500
D. Other Direct Expenses Building or room Rental/lease $14,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $14,000 Insurance $1,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,500 Cellular Telephone Access and expenses $350 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $350 General Copying Expenses, equipment lease, software purchase, printing charges, repairs and maintenance $5,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,500 General Office Supplies $1,200 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,200 Legal Advertising $100 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100 Motor Pool Rental and Car Maintenance /expenses $4,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,500 Postage, business reply permit, freight expenses, etc. $200 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $200 Telephone Access, expenses and system maintenance $200 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $800
Subtotal: $30,050 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $30,050
Total: $328,085 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $328,085
Deleted: 243,935
Deleted: 243,935
Deleted: 243,935
Deleted: 243,935
Deleted: 4,000
Deleted: 4,000
Deleted: 4,000
Deleted: 4,000
Deleted: 5,000
Deleted: 5,000
Deleted: 750
Deleted: 750
Deleted: 14,000
Deleted: 14,000
Deleted: 4,000
Deleted: 4,000
Deleted: 3,000
Deleted: 3,000
Deleted: 4,000
Deleted: 4,000
Deleted: 1,000
Deleted: 1,000
Deleted: 46,250
Deleted: 46,250
Deleted: 299,185
Deleted: 299,185
4.B.2
Packet Pg. 32 Attachment: Revised pages from the FY 16/17-17/18 UPWP (12547 : Amendment to the FY 18/19-19/20 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
9
TASK 2 DATA COLLECTION / DEVELOPMENT
4.B.2
Packet Pg. 33 Attachment: Revised pages from the FY 16/17-17/18 UPWP (12547 : Amendment to the FY 18/19-19/20 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
10
DATA COLLECTION / DEVELOPMENT
PURPOSE:
Develop and monitor the multimodal transportation system to preserve capacity, maximize personal
mobility and freight movement, ensure user safety and system security, and maintain the transportation
system’s integrity. Evaluate the system’s operating efficiency and conditions to assess current needs,
validate the long-range transportation planning model by looking at shorter range tasks, project future
travel demand, and identify future improvements. Coordination with local agencies, jurisdictions and
municipalities when reviewing and updating the forecasts and plans is essential. Update GIS database
to address current conditions related, but not limited to: functional classification; roadway network for
District One Regional Transportation Demand Model purposes; bicycle & pedestrian facilities
inventory; and prepare various overlays for analytical purposes. Coordinate with Collier County staff
on use of the County’s Interactive Growth Model (CIGM) in analyzing amendments and updates to the
Long Range Transportation Plan.
PREVIOUS WORK:
• Provided current data sources via the MPO’s Website.
• Compiled annual traffic data and conducted surveys for Congestion Management Process
(CMP) consideration.
• Updated the existing GIS maps. Coordinated with Growth Management Division,
Comprehensive Planning staff on land use forecasts and data review. Updated socio-economic
data and TAZ structures for the 2040 LRTP Update.
REQUIRED ACTIVITIES:
Coordinate with the planning departments of the municipalities to update the existing land use forecasts
and traffic analysis zone updates from the current county build out study effort to assist in these efforts.
Review and develop comments and recommendations regarding Intergovernmental Coordination
Element (ICE) activities, Evaluation and Appraisal Reports (EAR), Intergovernmental Coordination
and Review (ICAR), in regard to the MPO Long Range Transportation Plan.
Review of Data:
• Staff and consultant will coordinate with the jurisdiction’s Comprehensive Planning
Departments regarding land use forecasting efforts to ensure that demographic and
employment data at the Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) level of regional and local
transportation planning efforts are updated.
• Staff will coordinate with the planning and zoning departments of the municipalities to
ensure that updated socioeconomic, demographic and employment data are updated.
• Staff will maintain both employment and residential databases to ensure that the locations
and projected build-out of major new developments are accounted for in future forecasts.
• Continued coordination with jurisdictions, agencies and municipalities within Collier
County and adjacent to Collier County on community master plans, transportation system
4.B.2
Packet Pg. 34 Attachment: Revised pages from the FY 16/17-17/18 UPWP (12547 : Amendment to the FY 18/19-19/20 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
11
plans, multi-modal mobility plans, Strategic Highway Safety Plan etc. and the data used to
update and maintain such information.
• Update and review any functional classifications, boundary information and transportation
network databases and inventory.
• Participate in update of National Household Travel Survey (as deemed appropriate).
• Review and provide travel demand model information such as Annual Average Daily Traffic
(AADT) and volume-to-capacity ratios for planning documents and citizen’s request.
• Continue to track the implementation status of projects and update any project lists as
needed.
• Coordinate with FDOT and member agencies to address integration of MAP-21 and FAST
Performance Management Measures in the move towards performance based planning.
GIS
• Continue to expand program development for Web-based roadway data exchange and
review between agencies.
• Continue to create and update maps and graphics using GIS data.
END PRODUCTS: (TARGET DATE)
• Updated demographic and employment data forecasts. (as needed)
• Updated Traffic Analysis Zone/Traffic Analysis District
structure. (as needed)
• Miscellaneous research reports and analyses. (ongoing)
• Updated maps and graphics. ` (ongoing)
• Maintenance of functional classifications, boundary information
and TAZ data based on 2010 census. (as needed)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY:
FY 2018/19
Collier MPO FHWA (PL) $ 20,000
Consultant Services
FY 2019/20
Collier MPO FHWA (PL) $ 1,000
Consultant Services
Deleted: 20,000
4.B.2
Packet Pg. 35 Attachment: Revised pages from the FY 16/17-17/18 UPWP (12547 : Amendment to the FY 18/19-19/20 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
12
Task 2 - Financial Tables
Task 2 – DATA COLLECTION/DEVELOPMENT
Estimated Budget Detail for FY 2018/19
Budget Category &
Description
FHWA FHWA FTA FTA State
Match
FTA Local
Match
Trans.
Disad. Total (PL) (SU) 5303
A. Personnel Services MPO staff salaries, fringe benefits, and other deductions $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,000
Subtotal: $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,000
B. Consultant Services Contract/Consultant Services $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,000
Subtotal $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,000
Total: $20,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $20,000
Task 2 – DATA COLLECTION/DEVELOPMENT
Estimated Budget Detail for FY 2019/20
Budget Category &
Description
FHWA FHWA FTA FTA
State
Match
FTA
Local
Match
Trans.
Disad. Total (PL) (SU) 5303
A. Personnel Services MPO staff salaries, fringe benefits, and other deductions $500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500
Subtotal: $500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500
B. Consultant Services Contract/Consultant Services $500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500
Subtotal $500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500
Total: $1,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,000
Deleted: 10,000
Deleted: 10,000
Deleted: 10,000
Deleted: 10,000
Deleted: 10,000
Deleted: 10,000
Deleted: 10,000
Deleted: 10,000
Deleted: 20,000
Deleted: 20,000
4.B.2
Packet Pg. 36 Attachment: Revised pages from the FY 16/17-17/18 UPWP (12547 : Amendment to the FY 18/19-19/20 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
13
TASK 3 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAM MONITORING AND
DEVELOPMENT
4.B.2
Packet Pg. 37 Attachment: Revised pages from the FY 16/17-17/18 UPWP (12547 : Amendment to the FY 18/19-19/20 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
14
TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
PURPOSE:
Develop Multimodal TIPs for FY 2018/2019-2022/2023 and FY 2019/20-2023/24 that identify all
Federal, State, and locally funded transportation improvements consistent with the requirements of
Federal and State laws. Coordinate with FDOT and member agencies to address integration of MAP-
21 and FAST Performance Management Measures in the TIP. This section also includes transportation
system planning tasks related to contingency of operations and short-range transportation planning and
programming.
PREVIOUS WORK:
• Coordinated with agencies and jurisdictions on transportation plans and programs.
• Developed Annual preparation of TIPs and TIP Amendments with the assistance of a consultant
to develop a web-based TIP Tool.
REQUIRED ACTIVITIES
• Coordinate all TIP efforts with FDOT, local agencies, jurisdictions and the STIP.
• Continue to analyze proposed amendments to the current TIP for conformity, policy
implications, financial impact, and administrative changes.
• Prepare and distribute updates to the TIP.
• Develop reports that provide information on various aspects of transportation projects and
programs.
• Review and prioritize transportation system projects in the LRTP in preparation for the TIP.
• Continue to share project information with other transportation agencies and the public via the
MPO website and QRC.
• Prepare project priority lists for the MPO Board and its advisory committees.
• Continued incorporation of Efficient Transportation Decision Making (ETDM) into the
transportation planning process.
• Review ETDM projects and purpose and needs statements for projects on MPO priority lists
and in the LRTP.
• Continued incorporation of any air quality compliance and related air quality regulations (as
necessary).
• Review and update the Collier County Freight and Goods Mobility Analysis as necessary and
respond to inquiries regarding this document.
• Review and assess the need for freight strategies and develop them as necessary.
• Coordinate with FDOT and member agencies to address integration of MAP-21 and FAST
Performance Management Measures in the move towards performance based planning.
END PRODUCTS: (TARGET DATE)
• Miscellaneous research reports and analyses. (ongoing)
• Updated maps and graphics (ongoing)
• FY 2018/19 Transportation Project Priority List (4th Quarter)
4.B.2
Packet Pg. 38 Attachment: Revised pages from the FY 16/17-17/18 UPWP (12547 : Amendment to the FY 18/19-19/20 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
15
• FY 2019/20 Transportation Project Priority List (8th Quarter)
• Updates of available discretionary transportation funding
Programs project lists. (as necessary)
• FY 2018/19 – 2022/23 TIP (4th Quarter)
• FY 2019/20 – 2023/24 TIP (8th Quarter)
• TIP Amendments (as necessary)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY:
FY 2018/19
Collier MPO FHWA (PL) $ 20,000
FY 2019/20
Collier MPO FHWA (PL) $ 500
Deleted: 15,000
4.B.2
Packet Pg. 39 Attachment: Revised pages from the FY 16/17-17/18 UPWP (12547 : Amendment to the FY 18/19-19/20 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
16
Task 3 - Financial Tables
Task 3 - TIP
Estimated Budget Detail for FY 2019/20
Budget Category &
Description
FHWA FHWA FTA FTA
State
Match
FTA
Local
Match
Trans.
Disad. Total (PL) (SU) 5303
A. Personnel Services MPO staff salaries, fringe benefits, and other deductions $500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500
Subtotal: $500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500
Total: $500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500
Task 3 - TIP
Estimated Budget Detail for FY 2018/19
Budget Category & Description
FHWA FHWA FTA FTA State
Match
FTA Local
Match
Trans.
Disad. Total (PL) (SU) 5303
A. Personnel Services MPO staff salaries, fringe benefits, and other deductions $20,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $20,000
Subtotal: $20,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $20,000
Total: $20,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $20,000
Deleted: 15,000
Deleted: 15,000
Deleted: 15,000
Deleted: 15,000
Deleted: 15,000
Deleted: 15,000
4.B.2
Packet Pg. 40 Attachment: Revised pages from the FY 16/17-17/18 UPWP (12547 : Amendment to the FY 18/19-19/20 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
17
TASK 4 LONG RANGE PLANNING
4.B.2
Packet Pg. 41 Attachment: Revised pages from the FY 16/17-17/18 UPWP (12547 : Amendment to the FY 18/19-19/20 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
18
LONG RANGE PLANNING
PURPOSE:
To evaluate plans and programs for consistency with the 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)
and to begin preparation for a major update of the LRTP to the horizon year of 2045. MAP-21 and
FAST Act Performance measures will be integrated into the 2045 LRTP in an effort to move towards
performance based planning. This task will work in coordination with other tasks throughout the
UPWP, including Administration, Data Collection/Development, and Transit and Transportation
Disadvantaged.
PREVIOUS WORK:
The MPO’s LRTP was updated to a forecast year of 2040. The MPO adopted the 2040 LRTP in
December 2015. The 2040 LRTP was amended three times after adoption. The multi-modal LRTP
included transit and bicycle/pedestrian projects (both on- and off-road). The MPO staff worked with
member governments and advisory committees to evaluate changing land use patterns, to account for
changes that have occurred in the urban fringe and rural lands; as well as the significant growth in
Collier County.
REQUIRED TASKS:
• Prepare amendments or updates to the 2040 LRTP as required;
• Continue to execute the public participation plan for any 2040 LRTP amendments or updates;
• Address integration of MAP-21 and FAST Performance Management Measures on the 2040
LRTP, as necessary.
• Continued coordination with the FDOT District 1 regional transportation/planning model
Coordinating Committee and local staff on any updates required to the travel demand model
tool;
• Continue to incorporate the Efficient Transportation Decision Making (ETDM) Process into
the Long Range Multimodal transportation planning process. Continue to work with FDOT to
develop projects for the ETDM process as they relate to LRTP projects and priorities and to
provide project specific comments as part of the ETDM process.
• Attend meetings and participate on committees of FDOT District 1 Regional
Transportation/Planning Model (RPM) Coordinating Committee, GIS Users Groups, Florida
Standard Urban Transportation Model Structure (FSUTMS) Users Groups, and others as
needed.
• Attend training as necessary on FSUTMS;
• Utilize consultant assistance for modeling support, data development and evaluation, and other
support necessary to complete updates to the 2040 LRTP and to develop the 2045 LRTP.
• Begin coordination and development of the 2045 LRTP.
• Continued coordination with FDOT District 1 to develop the next generation Regional Planning
Model;
• Coordinate with member agencies to develop and review socio economic forecasts for the
2045 LRTP.
• Coordinate with the Lee MPO to prepare a scope and conduct an Origin/Destination Study
4.B.2
Packet Pg. 42 Attachment: Revised pages from the FY 16/17-17/18 UPWP (12547 : Amendment to the FY 18/19-19/20 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
19
• Coordinate with on-going studies related to climate change and vulnerability.
• Incorporate federal performance measures into the 2045 LRTP.
• Begin updating revenue projections, needs plan and cost feasible plan.
END PRODUCT: (TARGET DATE)
• Lee/Collier Origin/Destination Study (8th quarter)
• Amended 2040 LRTP ` (as needed)
• Data development for the 2045 LRTP (8th quarter)
• Socio-economic forecasts for the 2045 LRTP (8th quarter)
• Base model of District 1 Regional Planning Model (6th quarter)
for 2045 LRTP
• Financial Revenue Forecasts for 2045 LRTP (8th quarter)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY:
FY 2018/19
Collier MPO FHWA (PL) $162,379
Consultant Services
FY 2019/20
Collier MPO FHWA (PL) $295,803
Consultant Services (SU) $80,000
Deleted: 323,803
Deleted: 200,000
4.B.2
Packet Pg. 43 Attachment: Revised pages from the FY 16/17-17/18 UPWP (12547 : Amendment to the FY 18/19-19/20 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
20
Task 4 - Financial Tables
Task 4 – Long Range Planning
Estimated Budget Detail for FY 2018/19
Budget Category & Description
FHWA FHWA FTA FTA State
Match
FTA Local
Match
Trans.
Disad. Total (PL) (SU) 5303
A. Personnel Services MPO staff salaries, fringe benefits, and other deductions $40,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $40,000
Subtotal: $40,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $40,000
B. Consultant Services 2045 LRTP $122,379 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $122,379
Subtotal: $122,379 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $122,379
Total:
$162,379 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $162,379
Task 4 – Long Range Planning
Estimated Budget Detail for FY 2019/20
Budget Category
& Description
FHWA FHWA
FTA
5303
FTA
State
Match
FTA
Local
Match
Trans.
Disad. Total (PL) (SU)
A. Personnel Services MPO staff salaries, fringe benefits, and other deductions $2,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,000
Subtotal: $2,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,000
B. Consultant Services 2045 LRTP $293,803 $80,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $373,903
Subtotal: $293,803 $80,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $373,903
Total: $295,803 $80,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $375,803
Deleted: 30,000
Deleted: 30,000
Deleted: 30,00
Deleted: 0
Deleted: 30,000
Deleted: 200,000
Deleted: 493,803
Deleted: 200,000
Deleted: 493,803
Deleted: 323,803
Deleted: 200,000
Deleted: 523,803
4.B.2
Packet Pg. 44 Attachment: Revised pages from the FY 16/17-17/18 UPWP (12547 : Amendment to the FY 18/19-19/20 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
21
TASK 5 SPECIAL PROJECTS AND SYSTEMS
PLANNING
4.B.2
Packet Pg. 45 Attachment: Revised pages from the FY 16/17-17/18 UPWP (12547 : Amendment to the FY 18/19-19/20 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
22
SPECIAL PROJECTS & SYSTEMS PLANNING
PURPOSE:
To complete various recurring and non-recurring planning projects. These projects will assist in
providing a balanced, multimodal transportation system.
PREVIOUS WORK:
• Staff support to the citizen-based Bicycle & Pedestrian Advisory Committee.
• Development of annual Work Program priorities for construction of new sidewalks, pathways
and bike lanes.
• Served as liaison to FDOT to communicate the need for bicycle and pedestrian facilities on
State roads.
• Completed an update of the Comprehensive Pathways Plan in 2012. Began the Bicycle and
Pedestrian Master Plan in 2017. The plan is expected to be completed in the 2nd quarter of
2018.
• Coordinated with the City of Naples, Marco Island, Everglades City, and Collier County Staff
to complete an inventory of the current bike and pedestrian facilities.
• Incorporated the inventory into the Collier County Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Map which
will be published in 2018.
• Completed the Naples Manor Walkable Community Study (March 2010), Immokalee Walkable
Community Study (December 2011), and the Golden Gate Walkable Community Study (June
2018).
• Participated in the US 41 (Commercial Drive to Guilford Road) and Airport Pulling Road (US
41 to Estey Avenue) Pedestrian/ Bicycle Safety Audit.
• The MPO first adopted CMS priorities in August 2003.
• Developed the CMC Stakeholders Committee which developed the concept for the update of
the CMP in 2006.
• Updated CMP in 2008 and in 2017 to better define the CMP performance measures and process
for projects.
REQUIRED TASKS:
BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PLANNING SUPPORT:
• Consultant services to complete the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan .
• Conduct an annual project prioritization process, if needed.
• Participate in special events that promote bicycle/pedestrian activities and safety education.
• Continue outreach to Naples Pathway Coalition, Community Traffic Safety Team and Healthy
Community Coalition of Collier County to gain community support of Bicycle and Pedestrian
initiatives.
• Coordinate with MPO member governments and School District regarding data collection
activities to quantify number of bicyclists and pedestrians at specific locations around Collier
County.
4.B.2
Packet Pg. 46 Attachment: Revised pages from the FY 16/17-17/18 UPWP (12547 : Amendment to the FY 18/19-19/20 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
23
• Coordinate with FDOT and local governments to ensure that roadway expansion and retrofit
projects work towards meeting the bicycle/pedestrian goals identified in the Bicycle and
Pedestrian Master Plan.
• Work with the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) and School District to identify candidate
projects for Safe Routes to Schools Program.
• Analyze bicycle/pedestrian facilities and crashes
• Update the multi-modal components of the LRTP, and LOS analysis as needed.
• Incorporate bicycle and pedestrian facilities plans and programs into multi-modal and mode-
shift efforts.
• Coordinate with, and coordinate support for, the transit modal interface.
• Attend and participate in workshops and seminars sponsored by FHWA, FDOT and other
professional organizations as appropriate.
• Coordinate with FDOT and member agencies to address integration of MAP-21 and FAST
Performance Management Measures into Bicycle and Pedestrian planning in the move towards
performance based planning.
• Consultant services may be used on this task.
CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROCESS SUPPORT:
• Review CMP 2017 Update with the Congestion Management Committee (CMC) and prioritize
CMP projects for funding from Federal, State or local sources.
• Complete a biannual Transportation System Performance Report to provide a thorough system
assessment in order to identify where priority investments should be made.
• Staff will continue to coordinate with the Lee County MPO by attending their Traffic
Management and Operations Committee (TMOC) and on the Collier/Lee/Charlotte Traffic
Incident Management Committee to the extent necessary and feasible.
• Continue to coordinate with Collier Area Transit (CAT) and LeeTran with the LinC system
which connects CAT and LeeTran; thereby connecting two counties over an expansive
geographical area.
• Coordinate with FDOT and member agencies to address Congestion Management Planning in
an effort to move towards performance based planning.
• Consultant and/or MPO staff will continue to review the current CMP and will update or revise
the plan to reflect the latest strategies and performance measures as necessary.
• Attend and participate in local, jurisdictional, agency, municipality, FDOT and Lee MPO
technical meetings and workshops related to CMC, CMP, and congestion relief strategies.
• Consultant and/or MPO staff to gather traffic volume, traffic signal, and roadway geometry
information and crash statistics to facilitate the MPO’s assessment of congestion for the
Metropolitan Area.
• Facilitate “best practices” approach for incorporating CMP measures into existing plans and
programs, including preliminary engineering, traffic simulation modeling, and project
prioritization.
• Staff will continue to research alternative transportation choices to include Transportation
Demand Management (TDM) strategies in the CMP.
• Consultant and MPO staff will prepare a Countywide Strategic Highway Safety Plan.
4.B.2
Packet Pg. 47 Attachment: Revised pages from the FY 16/17-17/18 UPWP (12547 : Amendment to the FY 18/19-19/20 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
24
END PRODUCT: (TARGET DATE)
• Prioritized Transportation Alternative Program Projects (as needed)
• Prioritized Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects for inclusion in
FDOT’s Work Program. (as needed)
• Coordinated efforts with member governments. (ongoing)
• Pathways element of the Regional Transportation
Network. (annually)
• Community Traffic Safety Team (CTST) meetings and activities (monthly)
• Updated Bike/Ped Users Map (as needed)
• Bicycle and Pedestrian crash data (as needed)
• Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan (4th quarter)
• Transportation System Performance Report (December 2020)
• Updated Congestion Management Process (as necessary)
• Updated CMP project identification and prioritization (as necessary)
Methodology.
• Updated transportation project information. (ongoing)
• Updated traffic volume, signal and roadway geometry information (as necessary)
• Prioritized Congestion Management projects for funding. (as necessary)
• Strategic Highway Safety Plan (December 2020)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY:
FY 2018/19
Collier MPO FHWA (PL) $132,000
Consultant Services FHWA (SU) $135,000
FY 2019/20
Collier MPO FHWA (PL) $122,012
Consultant Services
Deleted: 7th quarter
Deleted: 8th quarter
Deleted: SA
Deleted: 200,000
Deleted: 152,000
4.B.2
Packet Pg. 48 Attachment: Revised pages from the FY 16/17-17/18 UPWP (12547 : Amendment to the FY 18/19-19/20 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
25
Task 5 - Financial Tables
Task 5 - Special Projects & Systems Planning
Estimated Budget Detail for FY 2018/19
Budget
Category &
Description
FHWA FHWA FTA FTA
State
Match
FTA
Local
Match
Trans.
Disad. Total (PL) (SU) 5303
A. Personnel Services MPO staff salaries, fringe benefits, and other deductions $65,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $65,000
Subtotal: $65,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $65,000
B. Consultant Services Transportation System Performance Report $61,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $61,000 Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan $6,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,000 Strategic Highway Safety Plan $0 $135,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $135,000
Subtotal: $67,000 $135,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $202,000
Total: $132,000 $135,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $267,000
Task 5 - Special Projects & Systems Planning
Estimated Budget Detail for FY 2019/20
Budget Category
& Description
FHWA FHWA FTA FTA
State
Match
FTA
Local
Match
Trans.
Disad. Total (PL) (SU) 5305
A. Personnel Services MPO staff salaries, fringe benefits, and other deductions $23,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $23,000
Subtotal: $23,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $23,000
B. Consultant Services Transportation System Performance Report $94,012 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $94,012 Strategic Highway Safety Plan $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,000
Subtotal: $99,012 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $99,012
Total: $122,012 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $122,012
Deleted: 200,000
Deleted: 200,000
Deleted: 200,000
Deleted: 267,000
Deleted: 200,000
Deleted: 332,000
Deleted: 50,000
Deleted: 50,000
Deleted: 50,000
Deleted: 50,00
Deleted: 0
Deleted: 97,000
Deleted: 97,000
Deleted: 102,000
Deleted: 102,000
Deleted: 152,000
Deleted: 152,000
4.B.2
Packet Pg. 49 Attachment: Revised pages from the FY 16/17-17/18 UPWP (12547 : Amendment to the FY 18/19-19/20 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
26
TASK 6 TRANSIT AND TRANSPORTATION
DISADVANTAGED PLANNING
4.B.2
Packet Pg. 50 Attachment: Revised pages from the FY 16/17-17/18 UPWP (12547 : Amendment to the FY 18/19-19/20 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
27
TRANSIT & TRANSPORTATION DISADVANTAGED PLANNING
PURPOSE:
To develop the LRTP, TIP and other plans, programs and technical studies relating to public
transportation at a system level for Collier County. To oversee and provide planning services for a
coordinated Transportation Disadvantaged (TD) Program in Collier County, in accordance with
Chapter 427 of the Florida Statutes (FS) and Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.) Rule 41-2.
PREVIOUS WORK:
• Compilation of transit operations data, including ridership, fare revenues, and other pertinent
data to evaluate efficiency and effectiveness of the transit system.
• Major Update and Annual Progress reports for the TDP.
• Coordinated with PTNE to address Transit Asset Management (TAM).
• Long Range Transit Needs section as part of the adopted 2040 LRTP.
• Completed the Comprehensive Operational Analysis (COA) which includes a complete
evaluation of programmed services to determine the most effective approach to providing
transportation service in Collier County within the current financial and operating constraints.
• Completed the Transit Development Plan (TDP) major update which was adopted in August
2015.
• Completed the American’s with Disabilities Act (ADA) Bus Stop Assessment / Study.
• Completed the Transit Fare Analysis Study addressing fixed route and paratransit.
• Participated in the development of Rule 41-2, F.A.C.
• Attended meetings of the TD Commission.
• Provided staff services to the Local Coordinating Board (LCB).
• Managed the TD services and prepared grant applications.
• As the Designated Official Planning Agency (DOPA), completed the Community
Transportation Coordinator renewal in 2018.
• Completed the Annual Community Transportation Coordinator (CTC) evaluations.
• Began the TDSP major update in 2018.
• Completed the TDSP Minor Updates.
• Began the Transit Fare Analysis Study (expected to be completed in June 2018)
• Coordinated with PTNE to review a scope of work for the Transit Impact Analysis.
REQUIRED TASKS:
TRANSIT:
• Conduct and maintain the operations of the MPO including providing administrative support
activities such as financial management, contract management, public outreach, personnel
matters, procurement of equipment and supplies and general management of Transit Planning
at the system level within the MPO. (Technical Code (TC) # 44.21.00)
4.B.2
Packet Pg. 51 Attachment: Revised pages from the FY 16/17-17/18 UPWP (12547 : Amendment to the FY 18/19-19/20 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
28
• MPO staff and Board, and PTNE staff will attend and participate in meetings, seminars, training
and workshops related to public transportation service which may include fixed route, ADA
and ParaTransit Services. (TC # 44.21.00)
• Coordinate with transportation partners to identify transit projects for various State and Federal
funding programs. (TC # 44.27.00)
• Prepare Transit Joint Participation Agreements and Section 5305(d) Grant Applications for
submittal with biannual UPWP and during the interim year. (TC # 44.21.00)
• Update of annual Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) goals (TC #44.21.00).
• Annual preparation of TIPs and TIP Amendments (TC #44.25.00).
• Coordinate with the planning departments of the municipalities to ensure that a multi-modal
aspect is included in their plans or projects (TC #44.22.00).
• MPO and PTNE staff will provide project management for consultant work activities associated
with the major update and annual reports to the TDP. (TC # 44.24.00)
• MPO staff will coordinate with PTNE staff on the major updates and annual reports to the TDP.
(TC # 44.24.00)
• Consultant and staff activities for the 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan. (TC #44.23.01
and 44.23.02)
• Consultant and staff activities for the Minor Annual Updates to the TDSP which also may serve
as the Locally Coordinated Human Services Transportation Plan (LCHSTP) as required for
FTA §5307, §5310 and §5311 and the programs previously known as Job Access and Reverse
Commute (JARC) and New Freedom programs. (TC #44.26.12)
• If the BCC becomes the designated recipient of additional FTA funds, the MPO staff will
coordinate as needed with the designated recipient regarding the grants. (TC #44.26.12)
• MPO staff will coordinate with PTNE and consultants regarding any multi-modal safety
initiatives. (TC# 44.26.00 and 44.26.16)
• MPO staff will coordinate with PTNE to address transit performance measures as required. (TC
#44.26.00)
• Consultant and staff activities to conduct a Transit Impact Analysis Study which will evaluate
the demand placed on the community’s transit network by development, which is an
important dimension of the overall transportation network that is overlooked when assessing
the impacts of development. (TC # 44.23.01 and 44.24.00)
• Consultant and staff activities to prepare the Transit Element of the 2045 Long Range
Transportation Plan. (TC #44.22.00)
• Consultant and staff activities to prepare a Collier Area Transit Park and Ride Study. (TC #
44.26.15)
• Consultant and staff activities to prepare a major update to the CAT Transit Development
Plan. (TC #44.24.00)
TRANSPORTATION DISADVANTAGED (TC#44.26.12, 44.26.13, 44.26.14 and 44.26.15):
• Monitor and evaluate performance of the CTC.
• Monitor Unmet Needs as determined by the TDSP Major Update.
• Cooperate with the CTC in developing funding applications.
• Coordinate with TD Commission and the LCB to ensure the maintenance of the Paratransit
System.
4.B.2
Packet Pg. 52 Attachment: Revised pages from the FY 16/17-17/18 UPWP (12547 : Amendment to the FY 18/19-19/20 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
29
• Attend and participate in meetings, seminars and workshops sponsored by the CTD and
FDOT.
• Provide staff support to the LCB Board. Technical assistance includes preparation of meeting
materials, meeting notices including legal advertisements of meetings and meeting
advertisements in the Department of State Florida Administrative Register, official minutes,
and maintaining permanent meeting records.
• Coordinate TD planning with the Transit Development Plan
• Insure effective coordination of non-emergency transportation services in metropolitan and
Immokalee rural areas.
• Review system safety and security considerations.
END PRODUCT: (TARGET DATE)
• Various grant applications throughout the year. (ongoing)
• Annual Transit Performance Report by PTNE. (annually)
• FTA Section 5305(d) Grant application (annually)
• FTA Section 5305(d) Funding Agreement (as needed)
• TDP Annual Updates (PTNE and MPO) (2nd and 8th Quarter)
• Major TDP Update (September 2020)
• Transit Element of the TIP (2nd and 8th Quarter)
• Transit Impact Analysis (December 2020)
• Park and Ride Study (December 2020)
• Transit Element of the Long Range Transportation Plan (8th Quarter)
• TD Services Program (maintained by CTC). (ongoing)
• Major Update of the TDSP (2nd Quarter)
• Minor Update of TDSP (8th Quarter)
• Updated Memoranda of Agreements, service contracts. (as required)
• Agendas and minutes for LCB meetings. (quarterly)
• FY 2019/20 annual evaluation of the CTC. (8th Quarter)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: FY 2018/19
Public Transit & Neighborhood Enhancement FHWA (PL) $ 25,000
Collier MPO *FTA (Sec. 5305) FY 15 and 16/17
Carryover $106,880
State (cash match) $ 13,360
Local match $ 13,360
FTA (Sec. 5305) FY 17/18 $113,655
Collier Area Transit State (cash match) FY 17/18 $ 14,207
Consultant Services Local match (FY 17/18) $ 14,207
FTA (Sec. 5305) FY 18/19 $115,900
State (cash match) FY 18/19 $ 14,487
Local match FY 18/19 $ 14,487
State TD Trust Fund $ 26,962
* The amount shown is the remainder of the grant available, not the award.
Deleted: 7th quarter
Deleted: 8th Quarter
Deleted: 6th Quarter
4.B.2
Packet Pg. 53 Attachment: Revised pages from the FY 16/17-17/18 UPWP (12547 : Amendment to the FY 18/19-19/20 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
30
FY 2019/20
Public Transit & Neighborhood Enhancement FTA (Sec. 5305) $118,587
Collier MPO State (cash match) $ 14,823
Collier Area Transit Local match $ 14,823
Consultant Services State TD Trust Fund $ 27,016
4.B.2
Packet Pg. 54 Attachment: Revised pages from the FY 16/17-17/18 UPWP (12547 : Amendment to the FY 18/19-19/20 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
31
Task 6 - Financial Tables
Task 6 – Transit & TD Planning
Estimated Budget Detail for FY 18/19
Budget
Category &
Description
FTA 5305
FY 17/18
FTA
State
Match
FY
17/18
FTA
Local
Match
FY
17/18
FHWA
(PL)
FTA 5305
FY 18/19
FTA
State
Match
FY
18/19
FTA
Local
Match
FY
18/19
Trans.
Disad. Total
A. Personnel Services MPO staff salaries, fringe benefits, and other deductions $74,965 $9,370 $9,370
$0 $19,264 $2,408 $2,408 $21,102 $138,887
Subtotal: $74,965 $9,370 $9,370
$0 $19,264 $2,408 $2,408 $21,102 $138,887
B. Consultant Services Transit Impact Analysis $32,800 $4,100 $4,100 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $41,000 Park and Ride Study $0 $0 $0 $0 $48,000 $6,000 $6,000 $0 $60,000 TDP Major Update $0 $0 $0 $0 $45,916 $5,739 $5,739 $0 $57,394 TDSP Major Update $0 $0 $0 $25,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $25,000
Subtotal: $32,800 $4,100 $4,100 $25,000 $93,916 $11,739 $11,739 $0 $183,394
C. Travel MPO Staff and PTNE staff attendance at training and conferences $3,887 $486 $486 $0 $1,600 $200 $200 $2,000 $8,859
Subtotal: $3,887 $486 $486 $0 $1,600 $200 $200 $2,000 $8,859
D. Other Direct Expenses Legal Ads $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,760 $2,760 Website $240 $30 $30 $0 $240 $30 $30 $0 $600 Fed Ex/ Postage $120 $15 $15 $0 $80 $10 $10 $1,100 $1,350 Office Supplies $1,643 $206 $206 $0 $800 $100 $100 $0 $3,055
Subtotal: $2,003 $251 $251 $0 $1,120 $140 $140 $3,860 $7,765
Total: $113,655 $14,207 $14,207 $25,000 $115,900 $14,487 $14,487 $26,962 $338,905
4.B.2
Packet Pg. 55 Attachment: Revised pages from the FY 16/17-17/18 UPWP (12547 : Amendment to the FY 18/19-19/20 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
32
Task 6 – Transit & TD Planning
Estimated Budget Detail for FY 19/20
Budget Category &
Description
FTA 5305
Carryover
(15/16 and
16/17)
5305
Carryov
er State
Match
(15/16
and
16/17)
5305
Carryov
er Local
Match
(15/16
and
16/17) FTA 5305
FTA
State
Match
FTA Local
Match Trans. Disad. Total
A. Personnel Services MPO staff salaries, fringe benefits, and other deductions $0 $0
$0 $23,264 $2,908 $2,908 $21,156 $50,236
Subtotal: $0 $0 $0 $23,264 $2,908 $2,908 $21,156 $50,236
B. Consultant Services Transit Element of 2045 LRTP $0 $0 $0 $36,000 $4,500 $4,500 $0 $45,000 TDP Major Update $43,200 $5,400 $5,400 $52,501 $6,562 $6,562 $0 $119,625
Park and Ride Study $55,680 $6,960
$6,960 $0 $0 $0 $0 $69,600
Subtotal: $98,880 $12,360 $12,360 $88,501 $11,062 $11,062 $0 $110,625
C. Travel MPO Staff and PTNE staff attendance at training and conferences $8,000 $1,000
$1,000 $4,819 $602 $602 $2,000 $18,023
Subtotal: $8,000 $1,000 $1,000 $4,819 $602 $602 $2,000 $18,023
D. Other Direct Expenses Legal Ads $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,760 $2,760 Website $0 $0 $0 $240 $30 $30 $0 $300 Fed Ex/ Postage $0 $0 $0 $120 $15 $15 $1,100 $1,250 Office Supplies $0 $0 $0 $1,643 $206 $206 $0 $2,055
Subtotal: $0 $0 $0 $2,003 $251 $251 $3,860 $6,365
Total: $106,880 $13,360
$13,360 $118,587 $14,823 $14,823 $27,016 $308,849
4.B.2
Packet Pg. 56 Attachment: Revised pages from the FY 16/17-17/18 UPWP (12547 : Amendment to the FY 18/19-19/20 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
33
TASK 7 REGIONAL COORDINATION
4.B.2
Packet Pg. 57 Attachment: Revised pages from the FY 16/17-17/18 UPWP (12547 : Amendment to the FY 18/19-19/20 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
34
REGIONAL COORDINATION
PURPOSE:
Provide for the creation of a region-wide multimodal transportation planning process in accordance
with Federal and State guidelines to ensure the coordination of transportation planning and policy
activities in FDOT District One.
PREVIOUS WORK:
• Represented the MPO at local, regional, State and Federal meetings.
• Attended quarterly Coordinated Urban Transportation Studies (CUTS) meetings, MPOAC
meetings.
• Developed and updated an interlocal agreement between the Collier MPO and the Lee County
MPO coordinating regional transportation solutions.
• Development and adoption of Lee-Collier Bi-County Regional Transportation Network that
includes Strategic Intermodal System (SIS) and other important cross-county connections and
intermodal facilities.
• Developed, adopted, and updated the Regional Transportation Network Priorities for Statewide
Discretionary funding.
• Developed the evaluation criteria for and ranking of candidate Transportation Regional
Incentive Program (TRIP) projects.
• The 2040 District wide model.
REQUIRED ACTIVITIES:
• Participation in the Lee County MPO and advisory committee meetings.
• Participation and coordination of Joint MPO Board and Joint Advisory Committee meetings
with Lee County.
• Coordinate with FDOT, Lee County MPO, other adjoining MPOs and adjoining jurisdictions,
municipalities or agencies to ensure that regional needs are being addressed and planning
activities are consistent. Such coordination includes but is not limited to discussion of regional
plans, review of the Strategic Intermodal System (SIS) plan, evaluation and ranking of TRIP
projects, and update of Joint priorities for regional and statewide funding.
4.B.2
Packet Pg. 58 Attachment: Revised pages from the FY 16/17-17/18 UPWP (12547 : Amendment to the FY 18/19-19/20 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
35
• Develop, adopt and update regional transportation priorities, including the Regional
Transportation Network Priorities, the Transportation Regional Incentive Program (TRIP)
projects and Regional Enhancement Priorities.
• Manage consultant services as required.
• Participation and membership in, the Association of Metropolitan Planning Organizations
(AMPO), MPOAC, District One CUTS, FDOT / FHWA quarterly conference calls and regional
quarterly meetings, and Florida’s Heartland Regional Economic Development Initiative
(FHREDI) meetings. Travel may be required for this activity.
• Analysis of State and Federal laws and regulations for MPOs, committees and local government
officials to aid them in the application of regional transportation policy strategies.
END PRODUCT: (TARGET DATE)
• An enhanced regional transportation planning process. (ongoing)
• Participation in the statewide MPOAC, the quarterly MPO
Staff Directors’ Advisory Committee and MPOAC subcommittees,
and FDOT District One CUTS meetings. (quarterly)
• Participation in the Lee County TAC meetings. (monthly)
• Joint meetings with the Lee County MPO advisory committees
and MPO Board. (annually)
• Participation in SWFRPC planning process. (as necessary)
• TRIP Priorities. (as necessary)
• Joint MPO Priorities for Statewide Discretionary Funding (as needed)
• Updated regional transportation priorities. (as needed)
• FHWA/FTA/FDOT meetings and trainings (as needed)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY:
FY 2018/19
Collier MPO FHWA (PL) $35,000
FY 2019/20
Collier MPO FHWA (PL) $9,000
Deleted: 30,000
4.B.2
Packet Pg. 59 Attachment: Revised pages from the FY 16/17-17/18 UPWP (12547 : Amendment to the FY 18/19-19/20 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
36
Task 7 - Financial Tables
Task 7- Regional Coordination
Estimated Budget Detail for FY 2018/19
Budget Category &
Description
FHWA FHWA FTA FTA State
Match
FTA Local
Match
Trans.
Disad. Total (PL) (SU) 5303
A. Personnel Services MPO staff salaries, fringe benefits, and other deductions $28,000 $0 0 0 0 0 $28,000
Subtotal: $28,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $28,000
B. Travel Travel to MPOAC and any other out of county activities as necessary $7,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,000
Subtotal: $7,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,000
Total: $35,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $35,000
Task 7- Regional Coordination
Estimated Budget Detail for FY 2019/20
Budget Category
& Description
FHWA FHWA FTA FTA
State
Match
FTA
Local
Match
Trans.
Disad. Total (PL) (SU) 5303
A. Personnel Services MPO staff salaries, fringe benefits, and other deductions $4,000 $0 0 0 0 0 $4,000
Subtotal: $4,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,000
B. Travel Travel to MPOAC and any other out of county activities as necessary $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,000
Subtotal: $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,000
Total: $9,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $9,000
Deleted: 25,000
Deleted: 25,000
Deleted: 25,000
Deleted: 25,000
Deleted: 30,000
Deleted: 30,000
4.B.2
Packet Pg. 60 Attachment: Revised pages from the FY 16/17-17/18 UPWP (12547 : Amendment to the FY 18/19-19/20 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
TABLE 1
AGENCY PARTICIPATION
FY2018/19
Red text in tables illustrates changed cells.
Soft Match Cash Match
1 85,000$ 230,000$ -$ 69,475$ -$ -$ -$ 384,475$ 30,000$
2 -$ 20,000$ -$ 4,411$ -$ -$ -$ 24,411$ 10,000$
3 -$ 20,000$ -$ 4,411$ -$ -$ -$ 24,411$
4 -$ 162,379$ -$ 35,813$ -$ -$ -$ 198,192$ 122,379$
5 67,000$ 65,000$ 135,000$ -$ 29,113$ -$ -$ -$ 296,113$ 267,000$
6 20,000$ 5,000$ 229,555$ 5,514$ 28,694$ 28,694$ 26,962$ 344,419$ 183,394$
7 5,000$ 30,000$ -$ 7,719$ -$ -$ -$ 42,719$
8 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 8,000$ -$ 8,000$
177,000$ 532,379$ 229,555$ 156,456$ 28,694$ 36,694$ 26,962$ 1,187,740$
177,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 177,000$
177,000$ 532,379$ 135,000$ 229,555$ 156,456$ 28,694$ 36,694$ 26,962$ 1,322,740$ 612,773$
FHWA PL FHWA SU FDOT FTA 5305 TD Trust Collier Co.Naples Everglades Marco Is.Total
-$ 156,456$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 156,456$
-$ 14,487$ -$ -$ 9,054$ 3,622$ -$ 1,811$ 28,974$
532,379$ 135,000$ -$ 115,900$ 26,962$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 810,241$
-$ -$ -$ -$ 5,000$ 2,000$ -$ 1,000$ 8,000$
-$ 14,207$ 113,655$ -$ 8,879$ 3,552$ -$ 1,776$ 142,069$
177,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 177,000$
709,379$ 135,000$ 185,150$ 229,555$ 26,962$ 22,934$ 9,174$ -$ 4,587$ 1,322,740$
* - FTA Section 5305 includes 2017/18 and 18/19 funding
Amount to
Consultant
De-obligation
from 17/18 FHWA (PL)
Total De-obligation from prior fiscal years
Administration
Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)
Regional Coordination
Transit and Transportation Disadvantaged
Locally Funded Activities
Data Collection/ Development
Special Projects and Systems Planning
Long Range Planning
FTA Section
5305*
Total fiscal year 2018/19 funds for all tasks
FDOT
Local
(1) For FY 2018/2019, FDOT will "soft match" the MPP/PL Funds using toll revenue expenditures as a credit toward the non-Federal matching share.
requested in this UPWP.
State Support/Match for MPO (1)
FY 18/19 State and Local Support for FTA Program (2)
FY 2018/19 Local Funding
TD Trust Total
The amount identified on this line represent the amount of "soft match" required (both State and local) for the amount of Federal PL section 112 funds
Total cost, including carryover, for all tasks
5305 Carryover
De-Obligation from Prior Fiscal Years
(2) This amount identified on this line represents the amount of FTA 5305 funding and the amount of local match (10%) required.
Task #Task Description
FY 2018/19 Funding
Total cost, including carryover, for all tasks
FHWA (SU)
T-1
Deleted: <object>
4.B.2
Packet Pg. 61 Attachment: Revised pages from the FY 16/17-17/18 UPWP (12547 : Amendment to the FY 18/19-19/20
TABLE 2
FUNDING SOURCE TABLE
FY 2018/19
T-2
Task Description FHWA PL FDOT Local
Task #Federal Soft Match Federal State Local Federal State Local Funding
1 Administration $ 85,000 230,000$ 69,475$ 315,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 384,475$
2 Data Collection/Development 20,000$ 4,411$ 20,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 24,411$
3 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) 20,000$ 4,411$ 20,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 24,411$
4 Long Range Planning 162,379$ 35,813$ 162,379$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 198,192$
5 Special Projects and Systems Planning $ 67,000 65,000$ 135,000$ 29,113$ 267,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 296,113$
6 Transit and Transportation Disadvantaged $ 20,000 5,000$ 5,514$ 25,000$ 113,655$ 14,207$ 14,207$ 115,900$ 14,487$ 14,487$ 26,962$ 8,000$ 352,419$
7 Regional Coordination $ 5,000 30,000$ 7,719$ 35,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 42,719$
8 Locally Funded Activities $ - -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
Total fiscal year 2018/19 funds for all tasks $ 177,000 532,379$ 135,000$ 156,456$ 844,379$ 113,655$ 14,207$ 14,207$ 115,900$ 14,487$ 14,487$ 26,962$ 8,000$ 1,322,740$
State Support/Match for MPO (1)-$ -$ -$ 156,456$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 156,456$
State and Local Support for FTA Program (2)-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 14,487$ 14,487$ -$ 28,974$
FY 2018/19 Funding -$ 532,379$ 135,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 115,900$ -$ -$ 783,279$
FY 2018/19 Local Funding -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 26,962$ 8,000$ 34,962$
Roll Forward from Prior Fiscal Year 177,000$ -$ -$ 113,655$ 14,207$ 14,207$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 319,069$
Total cost, including carryover, for all tasks 177,000$ 532,379$ 135,000$ 156,456$ 844,379$ 113,655$ 14,207$ 14,207$ 115,900$ 14,487$ 14,487$ 26,962$ 8,000$ 1,322,740$
Total
De-obligated
Funding from
17/18
State TD
Trust
FTA 5305 2017-18 (Carry
Forward)
Total
Federal
Funding
FHWA SA
Federal
FTA 5305 2018-19
Deleted: <object>
4.B.2
Packet Pg. 62 Attachment: Revised pages from the FY 16/17-17/18 UPWP (12547 : Amendment to the FY 18/19-19/20
TABLE 3
AGENCY PARTICIPATION
FY 2019/20
T-3
Soft Match Cash Match
1 328,085$ -$ 72,361$ -$ -$ -$ 400,446$ 1,000$
2 1,000$ -$ 221$ -$ -$ -$ 1,221$ 500$
3 500$ -$ 110$ -$ -$ -$ 610$
4 295,803$ 80,000$ -$ 65,241$ -$ -$ -$ 441,044$ 373,903$
5 122,012$ -$ 26,910$ -$ -$ -$ 148,922$ 99,012$
6 225,467$ 28,183$ 28,183$ 27,016$ 308,849$ 110,625$
7 9,000$ -$ 1,985$ -$ -$ -$ 10,985$
8 -$ -$ -$ -$ 8,000$ -$ 8,000$
756,400$ 80,000$ 225,467$ 166,828$ 28,183$ 36,183$ 27,016$ 1,320,077$
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
756,400$ 80,000$ 225,467$ 166,828$ 28,183$ 36,183$ 27,016$ 1,320,077$ 585,040$
FHWA PL FHWA SU FDOT FTA 5305 TD Trust Collier Co.Naples Everglades Marco Is.Total
-$ 166,828$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 166,828$
-$ 14,823$ -$ -$ 9,264$ 3,706$ -$ 1,853$ 29,646$
756,400$ 80,000$ -$ 118,587$ 27,016$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 982,003$
-$ -$ -$ -$ 5,000$ 2,000$ -$ 1,000$ 8,000$
-$ 13,360$ 106,880$ -$ 8,350$ 3,340$ -$ 1,670$ 133,600$
756,400$ 80,000$ 195,011$ 225,467$ 27,016$ 22,614$ 9,046$ -$ 4,523$ 1,320,077$
* - FTA Section 5305 includes the current allocation from 2019/20 and carryforward funding from the FY 15/16 & 16/17 grant.
Amount to
ConsultantFHWA (PL)
Total De-obligation from prior fiscal years
Administration
Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)
Regional Coordination
Transit and Transportation Disadvantaged
Locally Funded Activities
Data Collection/ Development
Special Projects and Systems Planning
Long Range Planning
FTA Section
5305*
Total fiscal year 2019/20 funds for all tasks
FDOT
Local TD Trust
(1) For FY 2019/2020, FDOT will "soft match" the MPP/PL Funds using toll revenue expenditures as a credit toward the non-Federal matching share.
requested in this UPWP.
State Support/Match for MPO (1)
FY 19/20 State and Local Support for FTA Program (2)
FY 2019/20 Local Funding
Total
The amount identified on this line represent the amount of "soft match" required (both State and local) for the amount of Federal PL section 112 funds
Total cost, including carryover, for all tasks
5305 Carryover
(2) This amount identified on this line represents the amount of FTA 5305 funding and the amount of local match (10%) required.
Task #Task Description
FY 2019/20 Funding
Total cost, including carryover, for all tasks
FHWA (SU)
4.B.2
Packet Pg. 63 Attachment: Revised pages from the FY 16/17-17/18 UPWP (12547 : Amendment to the FY 18/19-19/20
TABLE 4
FUNDING SOURCE TABLE
FY 2019/20
T-4
Task Description FHWA PL FDOT Local
Task #Federal Soft Match Federal State Local Federal State Local Funding
1 Administration 328,085$ 72,361$ 328,085$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 400,446$
2 Data Collection/Development 1,000$ 221$ 1,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,221$
3 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) 500$ 110$ 500$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 610$
4 Long Range Planning 295,803$ 80,000$ 65,241$ 295,803$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 441,044$
5 Special Projects and Systems Planning 122,012$ 26,910$ 122,012$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 148,922$
6 Transit and Transportation Disadvantaged -$ 106,880$ 13,360$ 13,360$ 118,587$ 14,823$ 14,823$ 27,016$ 308,849$
7 Regional Coordination 9,000$ 1,985$ 9,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 10,985$
8 Locally Funded Activities -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 8,000$ 8,000$
Total fiscal year 2018/19 funds for all tasks 756,400$ 80,000$ 166,828$ 756,400$ 106,880$ 13,360$ 13,360$ 118,587$ 14,823$ 14,823$ 27,016$ 8,000$ 1,320,077$
State Support/Match for MPO (1)-$ 166,828$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 166,828$
State and Local Support for FTA Program (2)-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 14,823$ 14,823$ -$ 29,646$
FY 2019/20 Funding 756,400$ 80,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 118,587$ -$ -$ 954,987$
FY 2019/20Local Funding -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 27,016$ 8,000$ 35,016$
5305 Carryforward -$ -$ 106,880$ 13,360$ 13,360$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 133,600$
Total cost, including carryover, for all tasks 756,400$ 166,828$ 756,400$ 106,880$ 13,360$ 13,360$ 118,587$ 14,823$ 14,823$ 27,016$ 8,000$ 1,320,077$
Total
State TD
Trust
FTA 5305 15/16 & 16/17 (Carry
Forward)
Total
Federal
Funding
FTA 5305 19/20FHWA SU
Federal
Deleted: <object>
4.B.2
Packet Pg. 64 Attachment: Revised pages from the FY 16/17-17/18 UPWP (12547 : Amendment to the FY 18/19-19/20
TABLE 5
The Planning Factors listed below are priority themes for the FHWA, the FTA and the FDOT. The matrix identifies which of the
Planning Factors and Emphasis Areas that will be considered in each of the UPWP Task activity.
Administration Data Collection
TIP Maintenance &
Development Long Range Planning
Special Projects &
Systems Planning
Transit &
Transportation
Disadvantaged
Planning
Regional
Coordination
Locally
Funded
Activities
1. Support the economic vitality of the metropolitan
area, especially by enabling global competitiveness,
productivity, and efficiency.
2. Increase the safety of the transportation system for
motorized and non-motorized users.
3. Increase the security of the transportation system for
motorized and non-motorized users.
4. Increase the accessibility and mobility of people and
for freight.
5. Protect and enhance the environment, promote
energy conservation, improve the quality of life, and
promote consistency between transportation
improvements and State and local planned growth and
economic development patterns.
6. Enhance the integration and connectivity of the
transportation system, across and between modes, for
people and freight.
7. Promote efficient system management and
operation.
8. Improve the resiliency and reliability of the
transportation system and reduce or mitigate
stormwater impacts of surface transportation.
9. Enhance travel and tourism.
10. Emphasize the preservation of the existing
transportation system.
11. Rural Transportation Planning
12. Transportation Performance Measures
13. ACES (Automated/Connected/Electric/Shared-use)
Vehicles
MAP -21 Federal Planning Factors
FAST Planning Factors
FDOT Planning Emphasis Areas
T-5
4.B.2
Packet Pg. 65 Attachment: Revised pages from the FY 16/17-17/18 UPWP (12547 : Amendment to the FY 18/19-19/20
DocuSign Envelope ID: A22CAD14-710B-44AD-AC97-DBFA510DB6E6
4.B.3
Packet Pg. 66 Attachment: Amendment to the MPO Agreement (12547 : Amendment to the FY 18/19-19/20 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) including
DocuSign Envelope ID: A22CAD14-710B-44AD-AC97-DBFA510DB6E6
4.B.3
Packet Pg. 67 Attachment: Amendment to the MPO Agreement (12547 : Amendment to the FY 18/19-19/20 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) including
4.B.4
Packet Pg. 68 Attachment: Resolution 2020-03 (12547 : Amendment to the FY 18/19-19/20 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) including the De-Obligation
Attest:
Approved as to form and legality :
2
COLLIER COUNTY METRO POLIT AN
PLANNING ORGANIZATION
By :~~V
Councilwoman Elaine Middelstaedt
MPO Chair
4.B.4
Packet Pg. 69 Attachment: Resolution 2020-03 (12547 : Amendment to the FY 18/19-19/20 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) including the De-Obligation
06/12/2020
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Ratification of the Chair’s approval of a zero-dollar Change Order to PO 4500195107 for the
Transit Impact Analysis (Contract #16-6562, Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc.)
OBJECTIVE: For the MPO Board to ratify the Chair’s approval of a zero-dollar change order to allow
additional time for its consultant to complete the Transit Impact Analysis and to modify the scope.
CONSIDERATIONS: The Collier MPO has adopted and procures goods and services under the policy
set forth in the Collier County Procurement Ordinance (Ordinance No. 2017-08, as amended). Under
Section 19.3.a, Contract Administration, of that Ordinance, change orders issued under a purchase order
or contract that exceed ten percent (10%) of a current Board approved aggregate amount, or twenty
percent (20%) of the current Board approved number of days must be approved by the Board. In this
instance, the attached Change Order seeks approval to add a period of additional days more than 20% of
the original MPO Board approved contract.
Because the Collier MPO Board approves all its own contracts with vendors, all future proposed change
orders that exceed those threshold amounts will be brought to the MPO Board for approval. Those under
the threshold amount will be administratively processed and made part of the contractual record.
Due to Covid-19, there was not a MPO Board meeting in April. The MPO Board gave the Chair the
authority to approve the change order and sign contractual documents in the Board’s absence. The Chair
approved this item on April 3, 2020 and signed all associated documents.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: This item is administrative in nature and does not require
committee action.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the Board ratify the Chair’s approval of the change order.
Prepared By: Brandy Otero, Principal Planner
ATTACHMENT(S)
1. Change Order (PDF)
2. Revised Scope of Work (PDF)
4.C
Packet Pg. 70
06/12/2020
COLLIER COUNTY
Metropolitan Planning Organization
Item Number: 4.C
Doc ID: 12548
Item Summary: Ratification of the Chair’s approval of a zero-dollar Change Order to PO
4500195107 for the Transit (Contract #16-6562, Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc.)
Meeting Date: 06/12/2020
Prepared by:
Title: – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Karen Intriago
06/03/2020 10:32 AM
Submitted by:
Title: Executive Director - MPO – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Anne McLaughlin
06/03/2020 10:32 AM
Approved By:
Review:
Metropolitan Planning Organization Brandy Otero MPO Analyst Review Completed 06/03/2020 10:53 AM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin MPO Executive Director Review Completed 06/03/2020 12:31 PM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin Meeting Pending 06/12/2020 9:00 AM
4.C
Packet Pg. 71
Procurement Services
0 Contract Modification
Contract#: 116-6562
IZI Work Order Modification O Amendment
I Change #: I 2 I Purchase Order#: ... I _4_5_00_1_9_5_10_1 _____ _, Project#: I 33449 .4
Contractor/Firm Name: I Tindale Oliver and Associates I Contract/Project: Transit Impact Analysis
I Brandy Otero I Collier MPO Project Manager Name:.._ _____________ ___, Division Name:~----------------~
Original Contract/Work Order Amount $ 123,040.00 10/5/19 Original BCC Approval Date; Agenda Item #
Current BCC Approved Amount $ 123,040.00, 9/3/19 , 48 Last BCC Approval Date; Agenda Item #
Current Contract/Work Order Amount $ 123,040.00 4/30/2020 SAP Contract Expiration Date (Master)
Dollar Amount of this Change $ 0.00 0.00% Total Change from Original Amount
Revised Contract/Work Order Total I $ 123,040.001 0.00% Change from Current BCC Approved Amount
Cumulative Changes I $ 0.001 0.00% Chancie from Current Amount
Completion Date, Description of the Taak(s) Change, and Rationale for the Change
Notice to Proceed! 4/8/19 I Original I 10/5/19 I Last Approved I 4/30/20 I Revised Date 12/31/20
Date L..-~---_ -_ -_ -_ -_ -_ -_ -_ ~~-Completion Date ..... -----· Date ..... ----~ (Includes this change)
I 245 I # of Days Added Select Tasks [gJ Add new task(s) [gJ Delete task(s) 0 Change task(s) [8l Other (see
below)
Provide a response to the followlng: 1.) detailed and specific explanation/rationale of the requested change(&) to the task(s) and / o r
the additional days added (If requested); 2.) why this change was not included In the original contract; and, 3.) describe the impact
If this change la not processed. Attach additional information from the Design Professional and/or Contractor if needed .
1. Remove funding in the amount of $25,280 and scope from task 4 as illustrated in attachment. Add funding in the amount of
$25,280 to new task 6 "Implementation Support'. Add time to project to complete new task . Add time to allow for presentations
after completion of new task. .
2 . During the development of the study, it became apparent that additional support was needed for Implementation activities . In
addition, out of an abundance of caution, the MPO Board cancelled all advisory committee meetings and the upcoming MPO
Board meeting for the forseable future, due to COVID-19. This outbreak and limiting of meetings was not anticipated in the
contract.
3 . The consultant will not be able to assist with implementing recommendations , such as drafting policy language updates . Due to
advisory committee meetings being cancelled , the consultant will not be able to complete the presentation portion of the scope if
the contract time is not extended.
Digitally signed by
Prepared by : Brandy Otero, Principal Planner Collier MPO OteroBrandy g~~:~~;ii 3 _30 (Project Manager Name and Division) 16,36,18 -04 •oo·
Date : 3/30/20
p
Acceptance of this Change Order shall constitute a modification to contract I work order identified above and will be subject to all the same
terms and conditions as contained in the contract/ work order indicated above, as fully as if the same were stated in this acceptance . The
adjustment, if any, to the Contract shall constitute a full and final settlement of any and all claims of the Contractor/ Vendor I Consultant /
Design Professional arising out of or related to the change set forth herein, including claims for impact and delay costs .
• Dig,.Wty ~b/EliMbeth 2020 Accepted by: Elisabeth Schuck=,.,..,31 0n, ... ..,,,.,. Date : _3_/3_1_/ ____ _
(Contractor I Vendor/ Consultant I Design Professional and Name of Firm , if project applicable)
Approved by :.,,,,--,-----,-----------,-------------------Date: _____ _
(Design Professional and Name of Firm , if project applicable)
MclaughlinAnne ~~~%~J~0i;r,~,~~~~~,,.
Approved by :--------------------------------Date : ______ _
Revised : 10/28/2014 (Divis ions who may require additional signatures may include on separate sheet.) PROCUREMENT USE ONL Y
Admln !~; BCC ES ®
4.C.1
Packet Pg. 72 Attachment: Change Order (12548 : Ratification of the Chair’s approval of a zero-dollar Change Order for the Transit Impact Analysis)
Approved by:
Attest:
Councilwoman Elaine Middelstaedt
Collier MPO Chair
Approved as to Form and Legality :
2~ .. ~ :'.b41./6"J ~ ¥
Deputy County Attorney
4.C.1
Packet Pg. 73 Attachment: Change Order (12548 : Ratification of the Chair’s approval of a zero-dollar Change Order for the Transit Impact Analysis)
Collier Area Transit & Collier Area Paratransit
Transit Impact Analysis & Funding Strategies
Scope of Work
Updated March 16, 2020
Background
The Public Transit & Neighborhood Enhancement Division (PTNE) is responsible for the management of
the Collier Area Transit (CAT) System. CAT provides Fixed Route and Paratransit transportation services to
the residents of Collier County. The Fixed Route system provides public transit service to the urbanized
areas of the County, including Naples, Marco Island and Immokalee. Limited Fixed Route service is also
provided in the Golden Gate Estates area. CAT also partners with Lee County Transit (LeeTran) to provide
an express route between the two counties. The Collier Area Paratransit (CAP) system provides passenger
door to door trips funded by two different programs; Transportation Disadvantaged (TD) and Americans
with Disabilities Act (ADA).
Through the years the service to the community has grown in response to the development that has
occurred in the area. The transit system has been responding to development rather than being a part of
the planning process so that the service can be provided as an alternative mode when the development
is completed. For Transit to be included as part of the development process it is necessary to understand
the demand placed on the community’s transit network by development when assessing the effects of
development.
All development generates traffic, and some may generate enough traffic to create congestion on the
existing roadways system requiring the community to invest more capital in the form of new roads, added
lanes, traffic signals or turn lanes. Currently as new development or redevelopment is proposed, there
are traffic impact studies that are required of the petitioner to analyze the impacts on the roadway
network but not the transit system as a component of the overall transportation network. Understanding
traffic impacts becomes even more important as budgets for public facility and infrastructure
improvements become increasingly strained. It is important to ensure that the evaluation of the traffic
impacts includes a multi-modal aspect to help expand the capacity of the existing roadway system.
In a community like Collier County, there are considerable numbers of elderly and young residents that
do not have access to a vehicle and may be willing to use public transportation. The community has a
very seasonal population that are used to public transportation as an option in the communities that they
are visiting from or would like the option of a transit system to take them to destinations they are not
familiar with. The Collier County, Cities of Marco Island, Naples & Everglades Growth Management Plans
and land development regulations do not contemplate transit impacts during the typical transportation
impact statement review. Without this alternative mode being considered as an option during the
development process, the transit agency is faced with finding a way to accommodate the demand after
the fact and without the necessary resources.
4.C.1
Packet Pg. 74 Attachment: Change Order (12548 : Ratification of the Chair’s approval of a zero-dollar Change Order for the Transit Impact Analysis)
The PTNE Division would like to have a study which assesses the effects that a development’s traffic will
have on the transit network in the community and provide criteria for determining the capital or operating
improvements required to the transit system in the form of stop improvements, route modifications or
additions based on the defined impacts. By preparing this study the transit system will be provided the
nexus required to include measurable Goals, Objectives and policies in the Growth Management Plan and
applicable land development codes to support the need to conduct a Transit Impact Analysis prior to
approving future developments inclusive of the incorporated and unincorporated areas of Collier
County. The study will help answer the questions of the implications of land use decisions on the transit
system.
The responsibility to upgrade transit network and associated amenities in conjunction with new
development is currently the sole responsibility of the Transit agency. Yet Transit agencies often lack
funding for improvements necessary to keep pace with development.
This study should provide information and analysis that can be used to develop funding strategies for the
benefit of enhancing transit to meet the development demands. These funding strategies may include
the development of parameters that can be applied to developments based on the land use being
developed (residential units; commercial use; # of jobs generated; etc.) to determine the improvement
that would be needed to support the impact (bus route; bus stop/shelter; park-n-ride lot; etc.). The
funding strategies could also include the establishment of funding sources that could support improving
the “backlog” of operational improvements and infrastructure as well as new improvements/
infrastructure. The research for the development of funding strategies should include an evaluation of
what other Counties/Transit Agencies are doing within this realm.
SCOPE OF SERVICES
The following tasks are requested as part of this scope and will correspond with the project schedule and
budget:
1. A kick-off meeting will be held via conference call. The kick-off meeting will confirm project
objectives, schedule, and deliverables. The meeting will also provide an opportunity to introduce staff
and identify roles and responsibilities for this project.
2. Data Collection and analysis. Data shall be collected of the transit service (system coverage, hours
of operations; headways; etc.) and cost; existing development and associated transit uses; analysis of
enhanced transit service and anticipated cost increase; anticipated components of capital cost
increase based on added service (buses/bus stops/shelters, transfer stations, park-n-ride facilities,
fleet maintenance etc.); and any other data and analysis needed to develop transit planning
parameters to be utilized during the development review to identify the impact on transit. The data
collected should also be usable to develop a nexus for the potential establishment of funding
strategies for transit. If a fee structure is contemplated the nexus could be structured in a way that
for the desired development pattern being proposed, the amount of Transportation impact fee would
be lower and/or transferred to promote transit development rather than adding another fee.
Conversely, if the proposed development is low density urban sprawl or in a rural area where it would
be more expensive to provide transit service, the fee would be higher.
The Consultant should develop a standard where trip generation rates and trip reduction factors
include calculations whereby if Transit is introduced along a corridor adjacent to the proposed
4.C.1
Packet Pg. 75 Attachment: Change Order (12548 : Ratification of the Chair’s approval of a zero-dollar Change Order for the Transit Impact Analysis)
development what impacts that would have on their traffic impact statement and what contributions
to the service the development would be required to make; and determine how to obtain funding
from existing developments that already impact transit and as a result, require implementation of
enhanced service to improve the service delivery to that area.
3. Prepare draft findings and analysis. A draft report of the findings, analysis and recommendation
for the Transit parameters, impact assessment and mobility nexus should be prepared and presented
to staff for their review and comments. The document shall be modified to incorporate staff
comments and input where applicable.
4. Conduct two public involvement workshops and two charrette type sessions. Workshop
notices will be prepared along with e-mail communications for CAT and the Collier Metropolitan
Planning Organization (MPO) to distribute and advertise as appropriate. The consultant will prepare
information for dissemination and present the proposed Transit impact analysis and funding
strategies to the public. The Consultant will work with CAT to ensure that workshop materials are
multi-lingual and persons at the workshop have access to multi-lingual staff for information
dissemination and questions in accordance with the Collier MPO Limited English Proficiency (LEP)
Plan.
Two Charrette style sessions shall be conducted with invitations to developers; major employers; and
others that might be impacted by new regulations to incorporate transit in the development process
in an effort to receive their feedback. The input received from these sessions should be considered
and incorporated into the report.
5. Prepare documentation and present to committees/boards. A final draft report will be
prepared to include all analysis; public, developer and employers’ comments; and a to document
recommendations for how Transit should be included in the development review process, including
discussion of potential the implementation of any funding strategies proposed, as appropriate. Staff
will be allotted a minimum of two weeks to review the final draft and provide comments back to the
Consultant for incorporation into a final report. Presentations will be given based on direction from
CAT. It is anticipated that these presentations will be given to the Development Services Advisory
Committee, the Collier County Planning Commission, the Public Transit Advisory Committee (PTAC),
the MPO Technical Advisory Committee (TAC), the Collier MPO Board, and the Collier County Board
of County Commissioners.
6. Provide implementation support for recommendations. Support will be provided to implement
the recommendations documented in the report and based on direction received from the
presentations conducted under the prior task. Implementation support includes activities such as
drafting updated Comprehensive Plan policy language, modifying development review procedures, or
similar efforts.
The consultant should be prepared to include County stakeholders throughout the process, including
Comprehensive Planning and Transportation Planning. Any other tasks respondents to this scope of
services believe are necessary to produce the best quality report and analysis should be included in the
proposal. This scope of work will be completed within 6 months by December 31, 2020 and a schedule
identifying individual tasks is will be provided.
4.C.1
Packet Pg. 76 Attachment: Change Order (12548 : Ratification of the Chair’s approval of a zero-dollar Change Order for the Transit Impact Analysis)
Collier Area Transit & Collier Area Paratransit
Transit Impact Analysis & Funding Strategies
Scope of Work
Updated March 16, 2020
Background
The Public Transit & Neighborhood Enhancement Division (PTNE) is responsible for the management of
the Collier Area Transit (CAT) System. CAT provides Fixed Route and Paratransit transportation services to
the residents of Collier County. The Fixed Route system provides public transit service to the urbanized
areas of the County, including Naples, Marco Island and Immokalee. Limited Fixed Route service is also
provided in the Golden Gate Estates area. CAT also partners with Lee County Transit (LeeTran) to provide
an express route between the two counties. The Collier Area Paratransit (CAP) system provides passenger
door to door trips funded by two different programs; Transportation Disadvantaged (TD) and Americans
with Disabilities Act (ADA).
Through the years the service to the community has grown in response to the development that has
occurred in the area. The transit system has been responding to development rather than being a part of
the planning process so that the service can be provided as an alternative mode when then development
is completed. For Transit to be included as part of the development process it is necessary to understand
the demand placed on the community’s transit network by development when assessing the effects of
development.
All development generates traffic, and some may generate enough traffic to create congestion on the
existing roadways system requiring the community to invest more capital in the form of new roads, added
lanes, traffic signals or turn lanes. Currently as new development or redevelopment is proposed, there
are traffic impact studies that are required of the petitioner to analyze the impacts on the roadway
network but not the transit system as a component of the overall transportation network. Understanding
traffic impacts becomes even more important as budgets for public facility and infrastructure
improvements become increasingly strained. It is important to ensure that the evaluation of the traffic
impacts includes a multi-modal aspect to help expand the capacity of the existing roadway system.
In a community like Collier County, there are considerable numbers of elderly and young residents that
do not have access to a vehicle and may be willing to use public transportation. The community has a
very seasonal population that are used to public transportation as an option in the communities that they
are visiting from or would like the option of a transit system to take them to destinations they are not
familiar with. The Collier County, Cities of Marco Island, Naples & Everglades Growth Management Plans
and land development regulations do not contemplate transit impacts during the typical transportation
impact statement review. Without this alternative mode being considered as an option during the
development process, the transit agency is faced with finding a way to accommodate the demand after
the fact and without the necessary resources.
4.C.2
Packet Pg. 77 Attachment: Revised Scope of Work (12548 : Ratification of the Chair’s approval of a zero-dollar Change Order for the Transit Impact Analysis)
The PTNE Division would like to have a study which assesses the effects that a development’s traffic will
have on the transit network in the community and provide criteria for determining the capital or operating
improvements required to the transit system in the form of stop improvements, route modifications or
additions based on the defined impacts. By preparing this study the transit system will be provided the
nexus required to include measurable Goals, Objectives and policies in the Growth Management Plan and
applicable land development codes to support the need to conduct a Transit Impact Analysis prior to
approving future developments inclusive of the incorporated and unincorporated areas of Collier
County. The study will help answer the questions of the implications of land use decisions on the transit
system.
The responsibility to upgrade transit network and associated amenities in conjunction with new
development is currently the sole responsibility of the Transit agency. Yet Transit agencies often lack
funding for improvements necessary to keep pace with development.
This study should provide information and analysis that can be used to develop funding strategies for the
benefit of enhancing transit to meet the development demands. These funding strategies may include
the development of parameters that can be applied to developments based on the land use being
developed (residential units; commercial use; # of jobs generated; etc.) to determine the improvement
that would be needed to support the impact (bus route; bus stop/shelter; park-n-ride lot; etc.). The
funding strategies could also include the establishment of funding sources that could support improving
the “backlog” of operational improvements and infrastructure as well as new improvements/
infrastructure. The research for the development of funding strategies should include an evaluation of
what other Counties/Transit Agencies are doing within this realm.
SCOPE OF SERVICES
The following tasks are requested as part of this scope and will correspond with the project schedule and
budget:
1. A kick-off meeting will be held via conference call. The kick-off meeting will confirm project
objectives, schedule, and deliverables. The meeting will also provide an opportunity to introduce staff
and identify roles and responsibilities for this project.
2. Data Collection and analysis. Data shall be collected of the transit service (system coverage, hours
of operations; headways; etc.) and cost; existing development and associated transit uses; analysis of
enhanced transit service and anticipate cost increase; anticipated components of capital cost increase
based on added service (buses/bus stops/shelters, transfer stations, park-n-ride facilities, fleet
maintenance etc.); and any other data and analysis needed to develop transit planning parameters to
be utilized during the development review to identify the impact on transit. The data collected should
also be usable to develop a nexus for the potential establishment funding strategies for transit. If a
fee structure is contemplated the nexus could be structured in a way that for the desired development
pattern being proposed, the amount of Transportation impact fee would be lower and/or transferred
to promote transit development rather than adding another fee. Conversely, if the proposed
development is low density urban sprawl or in a rural area where it would be more expensive to
provide transit service, the fee would be higher.
The Consultant should develop a standard where trip generation rates and trip reduction factors
include calculations whereby if Transit is introduced along a corridor adjacent to the proposed
4.C.2
Packet Pg. 78 Attachment: Revised Scope of Work (12548 : Ratification of the Chair’s approval of a zero-dollar Change Order for the Transit Impact Analysis)
development what impacts that would have on their traffic impact statement and what contributions
to the service the development would be required to make; and determine how to obtain funding
from existing developments that already impact transit and as a result, require implementation of
enhanced service to improve the service delivery to that area.
3. Prepare draft findings and analysis. A draft report of the findings, analysis and recommendation
for the Transit parameters, impact assessment and mobility nexus should be prepared and presented
to staff for they review and comments. The document shall be modified to incorporate staff
comments and input where applicable.
4. Conduct two public involvement workshops and two charrette type sessions. Workshop
notices will be prepared along with e-mail communications for CAT and the Collier Metropolitan
Planning Organization (MPO) to distribute and advertise as appropriate. The consultant will prepare
information for dissemination and present the proposed Transit impact analysis and funding
strategies to the public. The Consultant will work with CAT to ensure that workshop materials are
multi-lingual and persons at the workshop have access to multi-lingual staff for information
dissemination and questions in accordance with the Collier MPO Limited English Proficiency (LEP)
Plan.
Two Charrette style sessions shall be conducted with invitations to developers; major employers; and
others that might be impacted by new regulations to incorporate transit in the development process
in an effort to receive their feedback. The input received from these sessions should be considered
and incorporated into the report.
5. Prepare documentation and present to committees/boards. A final draft report will be
prepared to include all analysis; public, developer and employers’ comments; and a to document
recommendations for how Transit should be included in the development review process, including
discussion of potential the implementation of any funding strategies proposed, as appropriate. Staff
will be allotted a minimum of two weeks to review the final draft and provide comments back to the
Consultant for incorporation into a final report. Presentations will be given based on direction from
CAT. It is anticipated that these presentations will be given to the Development Services Advisory
Committee, the Collier County Planning Commission, the Public Transit Advisory Committee (PTAC),
the MPO Technical Advisory Committee (TAC), the Collier MPO Board, and the Collier County Board
of County Commission.
6. Provide implementation support for recommendations. Support will be provided to implement
the recommendations documented in the report and based on direction received from the
presentations conducted under the prior task. Implementation support includes activities such as
drafting updated Comprehensive Plan policy language, modifying development review procedures, or
similar efforts.
The consultant should be prepared to include County stakeholders throughout the process, including
Comprehensive Planning and Transportation Planning. Any other tasks respondents to this scope of
services believe are necessary to produce the best quality report and analysis should be included in the
proposal. This scope of work will be completed within 6 months by December 31, 2020 and a schedule
identifying individual tasks is will to be provided.
4.C.2
Packet Pg. 79 Attachment: Revised Scope of Work (12548 : Ratification of the Chair’s approval of a zero-dollar Change Order for the Transit Impact Analysis)
06/12/2020
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Ratification of the Chair’s approval of a zero-dollar Change Order to PO 4500193325 for the
Transportation System Performance Report (Contract #16-6562, Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc.)
OBJECTIVE: For the MPO Board to ratify the Chair’s approval of a zero-dollar change order to allow
additional time for its consultant to complete the Transportation System Performance Report.
CONSIDERATIONS: The Collier MPO has adopted and procures goods and services under the policy
set forth in the Collier County Procurement Ordinance (Ordinance No. 2017-08, as amended). Under
Section 19.3.a, Contract Administration, of that Ordinance, change orders issued under a purchase order
or contract that exceed ten percent (10%) of a current Board approved aggregate amount, or twenty
percent (20%) of the current Board approved number of days must be approved by the Board. In this
instance, the attached Change Order seeks approval to add a period of additional days less than 20% of
the original MPO Board approved contract.
Because the Collier MPO Board approves all its own contracts with vendors, all future proposed change
orders that exceed those threshold amounts will be brought to the MPO Board for approval. Those under
the threshold amount will be administratively processed and made part of the contractual record.
Due to Covid-19, there was not a MPO Board meeting in April. The MPO Board gave the Chair the
authority to approve the change order and sign contractual documents in the Board’s absence. The Chair
approved this item on April 3, 2020 and signed all associated documents.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: This item is administrative in nature and does not require
committee action.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the Board ratify the Chair’s approval of the change order.
Prepared By: Brandy Otero, Principal Planner
ATTACHMENT(S)
1. Change Order (PDF)
4.D
Packet Pg. 80
06/12/2020
COLLIER COUNTY
Metropolitan Planning Organization
Item Number: 4.D
Doc ID: 12549
Item Summary: Ratification of the Chair’s approval of a zero-dollar Change Order to PO
4500193325 for the Transportation System Performance Report (Contract #16-6562, Tindale-Oliver &
Associates, Inc.)
Meeting Date: 06/12/2020
Prepared by:
Title: – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Karen Intriago
06/03/2020 10:39 AM
Submitted by:
Title: Executive Director - MPO – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Anne McLaughlin
06/03/2020 10:39 AM
Approved By:
Review:
Metropolitan Planning Organization Brandy Otero MPO Analyst Review Completed 06/03/2020 10:50 AM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin MPO Executive Director Review Completed 06/04/2020 10:00 AM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin Meeting Pending 06/12/2020 9:00 AM
4.D
Packet Pg. 81
Co~County
1 ~
Procurement Services
D Contract Modification ~ Work Order Modification •Amendment
Contract#: 116-6562-6 I Change#: ... I _____ I Purchase Order#: 1 ... _4_s_oo_1_9-;:.3::.3-2_5::.::.::.::.::.::.::.-:.-:.-:.-:.::'.. _________ __, Project#: I 33557 .5.2 .1
Contractor/Firm Name: ~I =T=in=d=a=le=O==liv=e=r=================:::I Contract/Project: Transportation System Performance Report
I Brandy Otero I Collier MPO Project Manager Name: Division Name:,__ ________________ __,
Current BCC Approved Amount $ 157,485.0i:'J' 11/9/2018 , Last BCC Approval Date; Agenda Item #
Current ContracVWork Order Amount $ 157,485 .00 6/6/2020 · SAP Contract Expiration Date (Master)
Dollar Amount of this Change $ 0 .00 0 .00% Total Change from Original Amount
Revised Contract/Work Order Total I $ 157,485,001 0 .00% Change from Current sec Approved Amount
Cumulative Changes I $ 0.001 0.00% Change from Current Amount
Completion Date, Description of the Task(s) Change, and Rationale for the Change
Notfce to Proceed! 11712019 I Original I 6/30/2020 / Last Approved/ 613012020 I Revised Date
Date ;:· =========::::· Completion Date ..... ___ __,_ Date ..... ------'· (Includes this change)
# of Days Added I 92 I Select Tasks O Add new taak(s) D Delete task(a} D Change task(s) 12:l Other (see
below)
9/30/2020
Provide a response to the following: 1.) detailed and specific explanation/rationale of the requested change(s) to the task(s) and/ or
the additional days added (If requested); 2.) why this change was not Included In the original contract; and, 3.) describe the impact
if this change Is not processed. Attach additional information from the Design Professional and/or Contractor if needed .
1. Add 92 days to allow additional time for consultant to present draft and final study to MPO Advisory Committees and MPO Board .
2 . In an abundance of caution, the MPO Board cancelled all advisory committee meetings and the upcoming MPO Board meeting ·
for the forseable future, due to COVID-19 . This outbreak and limiting of meetings was not anticipated in the contract.
3 . The consultant will not be able to present to advisory committees or the MPO Board as required by the scope if the change is not
processed and the contract will not be able to be completed .
Digitally signed by
Prepared by: Brandy Otero, Collier MPO OteroB d OteroBrandy ran Y Date : 2020 ,03 .24
09 :37 :05 -04'00'
Date: 3/23/2020
(Project Manager Name and Division)
p
Acceptance of this Change Order shall constitute a modification to contract/ work order identified above and will be subject to all the same
terms and conditions as contained in the contract/ work order indicated above, as fully as if the same were stated i n this acceptance . The
adjustment, if any , to the Contract shall constitute a full and final settlement of any and all claims of the Contractor I Vendor I Consultant I
Design Professional arising out of or related to the change set forth herein , including claims for impact and delay costs.
William L Ball °'''""""'""'""'"'mL,B .. Accepted by : · °'"'"'"·'"""'"'"""'DD' Date : ______ _
(Contractor/ Vendor/ Consultant/ Design Professional and Name of Firm, if project applicable)
Approved by :---------------------,------------Date: ______ _
/Desion Profess i1,~;'3ffi11;',,ttame of Firm, if project applicable)
McLS"lJghl1nAnne Oa te : 2020.03.31 00:00:58
Approved by : -04'00' Date : ______ _
8 ~--------,
Revised : 10/28/2014 (Div isions who may require additional signatures may include on separate sheet.) PROCUREMENT USE ONl Y
Admln !ICC
Rp1 BCC es
4.D.1
Packet Pg. 82 Attachment: Change Order (12549 : Ratification of the Chair’s approval of a zero-dollar Change Order to the TSPR)
------------.. ---..
Approved by:
Attest:
~Y~,12:v
Councilwoman Elaine Middelstaedt
Collier MPO Chair
Scott R. Teach =
Deputy County Attorney
··---··-------
4.D.1
Packet Pg. 83 Attachment: Change Order (12549 : Ratification of the Chair’s approval of a zero-dollar Change Order to the TSPR)
Procurement Services
0 Contract Modification
Contract#: 116-6562
IZI Work Order Modification O Amendment
I Change #: I 2 I Purchase Order#: ... I _4_5_00_1_9_5_10_1 _____ _, Project#: I 33449 .4
Contractor/Firm Name: I Tindale Oliver and Associates I Contract/Project: Transit Impact Analysis
I Brandy Otero I Collier MPO Project Manager Name:.._ _____________ ___, Division Name:~----------------~
Original Contract/Work Order Amount $ 123,040.00 10/5/19 Original BCC Approval Date; Agenda Item #
Current BCC Approved Amount $ 123,040.00, 9/3/19 , 48 Last BCC Approval Date; Agenda Item #
Current Contract/Work Order Amount $ 123,040.00 4/30/2020 SAP Contract Expiration Date (Master)
Dollar Amount of this Change $ 0.00 0.00% Total Change from Original Amount
Revised Contract/Work Order Total I $ 123,040.001 0.00% Change from Current BCC Approved Amount
Cumulative Changes I $ 0.001 0.00% Chancie from Current Amount
Completion Date, Description of the Taak(s) Change, and Rationale for the Change
Notice to Proceed! 4/8/19 I Original I 10/5/19 I Last Approved I 4/30/20 I Revised Date 12/31/20
Date L..-~---_ -_ -_ -_ -_ -_ -_ -_ ~~-Completion Date ..... -----· Date ..... ----~ (Includes this change)
I 245 I # of Days Added Select Tasks [gJ Add new task(s) [gJ Delete task(s) 0 Change task(s) [8l Other (see
below)
Provide a response to the followlng: 1.) detailed and specific explanation/rationale of the requested change(&) to the task(s) and / o r
the additional days added (If requested); 2.) why this change was not included In the original contract; and, 3.) describe the impact
If this change la not processed. Attach additional information from the Design Professional and/or Contractor if needed .
1. Remove funding in the amount of $25,280 and scope from task 4 as illustrated in attachment. Add funding in the amount of
$25,280 to new task 6 "Implementation Support'. Add time to project to complete new task . Add time to allow for presentations
after completion of new task. .
2 . During the development of the study, it became apparent that additional support was needed for Implementation activities . In
addition, out of an abundance of caution, the MPO Board cancelled all advisory committee meetings and the upcoming MPO
Board meeting for the forseable future, due to COVID-19. This outbreak and limiting of meetings was not anticipated in the
contract.
3 . The consultant will not be able to assist with implementing recommendations , such as drafting policy language updates . Due to
advisory committee meetings being cancelled , the consultant will not be able to complete the presentation portion of the scope if
the contract time is not extended.
Digitally signed by
Prepared by : Brandy Otero, Principal Planner Collier MPO OteroBrandy g~~:~~;ii 3 _30 (Project Manager Name and Division) 16,36,18 -04 •oo·
Date : 3/30/20
p
Acceptance of this Change Order shall constitute a modification to contract I work order identified above and will be subject to all the same
terms and conditions as contained in the contract/ work order indicated above, as fully as if the same were stated in this acceptance . The
adjustment, if any, to the Contract shall constitute a full and final settlement of any and all claims of the Contractor/ Vendor I Consultant /
Design Professional arising out of or related to the change set forth herein, including claims for impact and delay costs .
• Dig,.Wty ~b/EliMbeth 2020 Accepted by: Elisabeth Schuck=,.,..,31 0n, ... ..,,,.,. Date : _3_/3_1_/ ____ _
(Contractor I Vendor/ Consultant I Design Professional and Name of Firm , if project applicable)
Approved by :.,,,,--,-----,-----------,-------------------Date: _____ _
(Design Professional and Name of Firm , if project applicable)
MclaughlinAnne ~~~%~J~0i;r,~,~~~~~,,.
Approved by :--------------------------------Date : ______ _
Revised : 10/28/2014 (Divis ions who may require additional signatures may include on separate sheet.) PROCUREMENT USE ONL Y
Admln !~; BCC ES ®
4.D.1
Packet Pg. 84 Attachment: Change Order (12549 : Ratification of the Chair’s approval of a zero-dollar Change Order to the TSPR)
Approved by:
Attest:
Councilwoman Elaine Middelstaedt
Collier MPO Chair
Approved as to Form and Legality :
2~ .. ~ :'.b41./6"J ~ ¥
Deputy County Attorney
4.D.1
Packet Pg. 85 Attachment: Change Order (12549 : Ratification of the Chair’s approval of a zero-dollar Change Order to the TSPR)
06/12/2020
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Ratify the Chair’s Approval of the FY 2020/21-2021/22 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
and MPO Agreement
OBJECTIVE: For the Board to ratify the Chair’s approval of the FY 2020/21-2021/22 UPWP, the MPO
Agreement and a resolution memorializing the Board’s approval.
CONSIDERATIONS: The MPO is required to develop and submit to the Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA) a two-year Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP). The UPWP serves as the
resource and budgeting document for the MPO for the coming fiscal years beginning July 1st.
The MPO will receive $548,485 in new Federal Planning (PL) funds and $185,000 in Surface
Transportation Program - Urban Area (SU) funds which are a carryforward from 2019/20 in FY 2020/21.
In addition, there is a $83,588 carryover from de-obligation of the FY 2018/19-FY19/20 UPWP; a
Transportation Disadvantaged Grant (TD Grant) allocation of $27,016; a FTA Section 5305(d) Grant
allocation and carry-forward of $309,974; a FTA Section 5307 grant of $ 93,559; and a State and local
contribution of $85,492. The total FY 2020/21 funding for all UPWP tasks is $1,333,114 (amount does
not include FDOT’s soft match). Funding begins July 1, 2020. The State’s fiscal year does not coincide
with the County’s budget cycle.
The second year does not include any carry-forward or de-obligation amounts. The total FY 2021/22
funding for all UPWP tasks is $731,734.
Since the document was presented in March, the following changes have been made:
Updated Table of Contents
Corrected formatting throughout the document
Revised budget to include De-obligated funding from FY 19/20 in the amount of $83,588
Revised funding allocated in Task 1 to include transcriptionist
Corrected errors in Task 6 FY 20/21 Budget Detail Table
Updated Summary tables
Revised soft match amount and language
Revised document to address comments as noted in the Appendices
MPO staff has incorporated all changes and comments received from FHWA, the Florida Department of
Transportation (FDOT) and the advisory committees related to UPWP. The comments have been
included in the appendices. The final 2020/21-2021/22 UPWP is included as Attachment 1.
Pursuant to the MPO’s Public Involvement/Public Participation Plan, the final UPWP was ann ounced on
the MPO’s website and was sent to the MPO’s Adviser network. One public comment was received and
has been addressed in Appendix D of Attachment 1.
The MPO Agreement for PL Funding establishes the cooperative relationship between the Collier MPO
4.E
Packet Pg. 86
06/12/2020
and FDOT to accomplish the transportation planning requirements of State and federal law. The
agreement runs concurrently with the new FY 2020/21 - 2021/22 Unified Planning Work Program
(UPWP). The MPO Agreement will become effective July 1, 2020 and wi ll terminate on June 30, 2022.
The Agreement is included as Attachment 2.
FDOT requires a resolution memorializing the approval of the UPWP and the MPO Agreement. The
resolution is included as Attachment 3.
The MPO Board delegated authority to the MPO Chair to sign time-sensitive documents during the
COVID-19 pandemic. The MPO Chair approved and signed the UPWP and all associated documents on
May 8, 2020.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: The Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) and Citizens
Advisory Committee (CAC) voted to endorse the draft UPWP on February 24th. Due to COVID-19, all
advisory meetings were cancelled. The final document was sent via email to advisory committee
members for review and comment. No comments were received.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the Board ratify the Chair’s approval of the FY 2020/21- 2021/22
UPWP, the MPO Agreement and the attached resolution memorializing the Board’s approval.
Prepared By: Brandy Otero, Collier MPO Principal Planner
ATTACHMENT(S)
1. FY 2020/21-2021/22 UPWP (PDF)
2. MPO Agreement for PL funding (PDF)
3. Resolution 2020-04 (PDF)
4.E
Packet Pg. 87
06/12/2020
COLLIER COUNTY
Metropolitan Planning Organization
Item Number: 4.E
Doc ID: 12550
Item Summary: Ratify the Chair’s Approval of the FY 2020/21-2021/22 Unified Planning Work
Program (UPWP) and MPO Agreement
Meeting Date: 06/12/2020
Prepared by:
Title: – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Karen Intriago
06/03/2020 10:54 AM
Submitted by:
Title: Executive Director - MPO – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Anne McLaughlin
06/03/2020 10:54 AM
Approved By:
Review:
Metropolitan Planning Organization Brandy Otero MPO Analyst Review Completed 06/03/2020 10:58 AM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin MPO Executive Director Review Completed 06/03/2020 12:29 PM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin Meeting Pending 06/12/2020 9:00 AM
4.E
Packet Pg. 88
4.E.1
Packet Pg. 89 Attachment: FY 2020/21-2021/22 UPWP (12550 : Ratify the Chair’s Approval of the FY 2020/21-2021/22 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
COST ANALYSIS CERTIFICATION .............................................................................................. 4
INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................ 5
DEFINITION OF THE UPWP ............................................................................................................................... 5
OVERVIEW AND STATUS OF CURRENT PLANNING ACTIVITIES......................................................................... 5
CURRENT LOCAL AND REGIONAL PLANNING PRIORITIES ................................................................................ 7
AIR QUALITY PLANNING ACTIVITIES ................................................................................................................. 7
SOFT MATCH ..................................................................................................................................................... 7
PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT PROCESS ...................................................................................................................... 8
FEDERAL AND STATE PLANNING EMPHASIS AREAS ......................................................................................... 8
ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT ..................................................................................... 12
IDENTIFICATION OF MPO PARTICIPANTS ....................................................................................................... 12
OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES AND BYLAWS ................................................................................................... 13
EXECUTED AGREEMENTS ................................................................................................................................ 14
CERTIFICATIONS AND ASSURANCES ............................................................................................................... 14
STATE/FEDERAL PLANNING EMPHASIS AREA MATRIX ................................................................................... 14
TASK 1 ADMINISTRATION ..................................................................................................... 17
TASK 2 DATA COLLECTION / DEVELOPMENT ................................................................. 21
TASK 3 TIP MONITORING AND DEVELOPMENT .............................................................. 24
TASK 4 LONG RANGE PLANNING ......................................................................................... 26
TASK 5 SPECIAL PROJECTS AND SYSTEMS PLANNING ................................................. 29
TASK 6 TRANSIT AND TRANSPORTATION DISADVANTAGED PLANNING ............... 32
TASK 7 REGIONAL COORDINATION ................................................................................... 36
TASK 8 LOCALLY FUNDED ACTIVITIES ............................................................................. 39
SUMMARY TABLES ........................................................................................................................ 41
TABLE 1 – FY 2020/21 AGENCY PARTICIPATION ............................................................................................. 43
TABLE 2 – FY 2020/21 FUNDING SOURCE ...................................................................................................... 44
TABLE 3 – FY 2021/22 AGENCY PARTICIPATION ............................................................................................. 45
TABLE 4 – FY 2021/22 FUNDING SOURCE ...................................................................................................... 46
TABLE 5 – PLANNING FACTOR AND PEA MATRIX ........................................................................................... 47
APPENDICES .................................................................................................................................... 48
4.E.1
Packet Pg. 90 Attachment: FY 2020/21-2021/22 UPWP (12550 : Ratify the Chair’s Approval of the FY 2020/21-2021/22 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
3
APPENDIX A – COMMONLY USED ACRONYMS ............................................................................................... 49
APPENDIX B – PLANNING STUDIES IN THE MPO AREA ................................................................................... 52
APPENDIX C – STATEMENTS AND ASSURANCES ............................................................................................ 53
APPENDIX D – RESPONSE TO COMMENTS ..................................................................................................... 60
4.E.1
Packet Pg. 91 Attachment: FY 2020/21-2021/22 UPWP (12550 : Ratify the Chair’s Approval of the FY 2020/21-2021/22 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
4
COST ANALYSIS CERTIFICATION
4.E.1
Packet Pg. 92 Attachment: FY 2020/21-2021/22 UPWP (12550 : Ratify the Chair’s Approval of the FY 2020/21-2021/22 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
5
INTRODUCTION
DEFINITION OF THE UPWP
The Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) for the Collier Metropolitan Planning Area documents
transportation planning and transportation planning related activities for the two year period starting
July 1, 2020 (FY 2020/21-2021/22). The UPWP is the basis for allocating federal, state and local funds
for transportation planning purposes in the Collier Metropolitan Planning area. At a minimum, a
UPWP includes a description of the work and resulting products, indicates who will perform the work,
provides timeframes and deadlines for completing the work, includes the cost of the work and the
source(s) of funds.
This Work Program is consistent with all federal and state requirements. All products and planning
concepts and factors follow Federal and State guidelines. The Collier MPO complies with Title VI of
the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Title VI prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national
origin, age, disability, religion or sex.
The objective of the Collier MPO is to provide for a Continuing, Comprehensive, and Cooperative
approach to the planning process. The MPO performs a variety of tasks utilizing funds under Titles 23
and 49, and Title 49 Chapter 53, U.S.C. Those tasks include annual development of the Transportation
Improvement Program (TIP); continually improving the Congestion Management Process; regular
updates to the Transit Development Plan (TDP) and Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan
(TDSP); support of Bicycle and Pedestrian Planning activities; preparation of updates to the Long
Range Transportation Plan; periodically updating the Public Involvement Plan (PIP), expanding public
outreach activities and implementing strategies to address environmental justice issues; and supporting
FDOT District One and Collier County planning activities with emphasis on improving traffic
modeling and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) capabilities. All eligible expenses will be
reimbursed on an actual cost basis and therefore an indirect rate will not be utilized.
OVERVIEW AND STATUS OF CURRENT PLANNING ACTIVITIES
Long Range Transportation Plan
The Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) is a critical tool in the MPO process. It is composed of
a Needs Assessment, a Cost Feasible Plan, and several multi-modal transportation components. It is
the primary document in which multi-modal components (such as pathways, transit and other projects),
land use data and projected revenues are integrated in the long range planning process. The 2040 LRTP
was adopted in December 2015. Three amendments to the plan were completed.
The 2045 LRTP started in 2019 and will continue through 2020. Adoption is due in December 2020.
The development of the 2045 LRTP includes coordination with member agencies and the Florida
Department of Transportation. The MPO has transmitted data for the 2015 Existing + Committed
network and the 2015 and 2045 Socio Economic Data to FDOT for use in constructing the Districtwide
Travel Demand Model. Next steps include public involvement, financial revenue projections,
coordination and development of Needs Plan projects, project cost estimates development, a cost
feasible plan, development of operations
4.E.1
Packet Pg. 93 Attachment: FY 2020/21-2021/22 UPWP (12550 : Ratify the Chair’s Approval of the FY 2020/21-2021/22 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
6
INTRODUCTION (cont.)
and maintenance costs, and a review of other plans and programs which will result in a multi-modal,
long-range blueprint for the community’s policy makers.
Congestion Management Process (CMP)
An operational CMS was originally adopted in 1997 and was updated in 2006. The CMS was
developed to reduce congestion, not by adding travel lanes to existing highways, but by such initiatives
as improving traffic signal timing, improving intersections (adding/lengthening turn lanes, etc.), and
modifying medians. In 2008, the MPO updated the CMS and renamed it the Congestion Management
Process (CMP). The CMP was updated again in 2017. The latest update brought the document current
with the 2040 LRTP and with new federal legislation which requires performance-based and data
driven planning. The updated CMP adopted performance measures and required project sponsors to
establish baseline measures and report on the results to the Congestion Management Committee and
the MPO Board.
The CMP also recognized the need for a more extensive data analysis. This led to the recommendation
to fund a biennial Transportation System Performance Report (TSPR), which is intended to identify
projects and priorities going forward. The first TSPR is currently underway and is expected to be
completed in June 2020. The results will help prioritize projects for Congestion Management funding
and the LRTP.
Transit Planning
A major Transit Development Plan (TDP) update is being developed and is expected to be completed
in September 2020. The results of the TDP update will guide the transit element of the 2045 LRTP.
The Public Transit and Neighborhood Enhancement (PTNE) Department in coordination with the
Collier MPO completes Annual Progress Reports to the TDP in-house.
A Park and Ride study is currently underway. This study is expected to be completed in October 2020
and will help shape the transit element of the 2045 LRTP.
A Transit Impact Analysis is being conducted to help understand the demand placed on the
community’s transit network by development. This study is expected to be completed by August 2020.
The last Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) major update was completed in 2018. The
Collier MPO serves as the designated official planning agency and performs Transportation
Disadvantaged Planning activities. Two annual updates of the TDSP will be completed in house in
2021 and 2022.
Local Road Safety Plan
This plan was funded through the Congestion Management priority process and is intended to be a data
driven, 5-year safety plan that will guide the MPO in identifying implementation efforts that support
FDOT’s “Vision Zero”. The LRSP will be guided by the FDOT Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP)
and will relate to Federal Highway’s proven safety countermeasures and national vision zero strategies.
The study will be managed by the MPO and completed by a consultant. It is expected be completed
in November 2020.
4.E.1
Packet Pg. 94 Attachment: FY 2020/21-2021/22 UPWP (12550 : Ratify the Chair’s Approval of the FY 2020/21-2021/22 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
7
CURRENT LOCAL AND REGIONAL PLANNING PRIORITIES
FY 2020/21 and FY 2021/22 UPWP Transportation Planning Priorities
Completing the 2045 LRTP continues to be a major focus for the upcoming fiscal years of 2020/21
and 2021/22, along with the many technical plans and studies that are underway that support the
development of the LRTP. This is particularly appropriate given the substantial amount of population
growth projected for Collier County. Initially, the MPO’s public involvement activities will also be
highly focused on the development of the LRTP and related technical plans. Following the adoption of
the LRTP in December 2020, the focus will begin the shift towards implementation, monitoring and
reporting on performance measures and increasing public awareness of modal options and services
and, most importantly, of traffic laws and public safety.
Regional Transportation Planning Activities
The Lee County and Collier MPOs meet annually to discuss regional issues and projects which may
have a joint impact on the area. The Collier MPO participates in the Lee MPO’s Technical Advisory
Committee (TAC) and the Lee MPO participates in the Collier TAC. The MPOs will continue to work
together to endorse and adopt regional priorities for enhancements, TRIP, highway and transit projects.
In addition, the Collier MPO participates in meetings of the Coordinated Urban Transportation Systems
(CUTS), the Metropolitan Planning Organization Advisory Council (MPOAC), and in district and
state-wide meetings with FDOT.
AIR QUALITY PLANNING ACTIVITIES
The Collier MPO is in an air quality attainment area and does not anticipate completing any non-
attainment planning activities at this time; however, air quality of the area continues to be monitored
and staff participates in training as needed.
SOFT MATCH
Section 120 of Title 23, U.S.C, permits a state to use certain toll revenue expenditures as a credit toward
the non-federal matching share of all programs authorized by Title 23, (with the exception of
Emergency Relief Programs) and for transit programs authorized by Chapter 53 of Title 49, U.S.C.
This is in essence a “soft-match” provision that allows the federal share to be increased up to 100% to
the extent credits are available. The “soft match” amount being utilized to match the FHWA funding
in this UPWP is 18.07% of FHWA program funds for a total of $180,209 in FY 2020/21 and $120,971
in FY 2021/22 for a total of $301,180.
FDOT District One Planning Activities
Florida Department of Transportation- District One District Wide Planning activities for FY20/21-
FY21/22) include the following:
• GIS Application Development and System Maintenance
4.E.1
Packet Pg. 95 Attachment: FY 2020/21-2021/22 UPWP (12550 : Ratify the Chair’s Approval of the FY 2020/21-2021/22 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
8
• Systems Planning and Reviews
• Interchange Reviews
• Travel Demand Model Development
• ETDM/Community Impact Assessment
• Statistics
• Federal Functional Classification
• Traffic Counts Program
• Modal Development Technical Support
• Transportation Alternatives Program Development
• Commuter Services
• State Highway System Corridor Studies
• Growth Management Impact Reviews
• Complete Streets Studies
• Promoting and coordinating Safety for all modes of transportation, including bicycle and
pedestrian
As part of the 3 “C” planning process, District staff coordinate planning activities with the MPO.
MPO Board and Advisory Committee members are notified of project meetings within the MPO
area. FDOT staff presents status reports to solicit feedback on planning activities and to ensure that
District planning studies and MPO planning activities are coordinated.
PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT PROCESS
The development of the UPWP has been subject to public review and comment and is consistent with
the Collier MPO’s adopted Public Participation Plan (PPP). The draft is sent to the TAC and CAC for
review, announced on the Collier MPO website and sent to interested parties via email to the MPO’s
listserv on the date the TAC/CAC agenda packets are posted and distributed.
MPO staff responds in writing to input received from the public and all comments received from the
public, advisory committee members and Board members are memorialized and addressed in this
document. All comments received, including from FHWA, FTA, and FDOT have been addressed and
incorporated into Appendix D of the final document.
A draft of this UPWP was endorsed by the Citizens and Technical Advisory Committees on February
24, 2020 and approved by the MPO Board on March 13, 2020. The final document was sent via email
to the Citizens and Technical Advisory Committee members on April 20, 2020 for review and comment
and received final approval by the Collier MPO Chair on May 8, 2020. The final document will be
ratified by the MPO Board at the June MPO Board meeting.
FEDERAL AND STATE PLANNING EMPHASIS AREAS
STATE PLANNING EMPHASIS AREAS – 2020
The Florida Department of Transportation Office of Policy Planning develops Planning Emphasis
Areas on a two-year cycle in coordination with the development of Metropolitan Planning
4.E.1
Packet Pg. 96 Attachment: FY 2020/21-2021/22 UPWP (12550 : Ratify the Chair’s Approval of the FY 2020/21-2021/22 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
9
Organizations’ respective unified planning work programs. Emphasis areas set planning priorities,
support the Florida Transportation Plan, and give importance to topic areas which MPOs are
encouraged to address as they develop their planning programs. Implementation of the seven goals of
the Florida Transportation Plan requires embracing innovation; extensive collaboration across
jurisdictions, modes and disciplines; an emphasis on customer service; data and performance feedback;
and strategic investments for the efficient and effective allocation of resources.
The Collier MPO has considered the four topics shown below and included them in studies identified
in this UPWP.
Safety
Safety has been a federal planning priority over numerous iterations of the transportation legislation.
As stated within the FAST Act planning factors, metropolitan areas should “increase safety for
motorized and non-motorized users.” The state of Florida has expanded on this concept further by
becoming a Vision Zero area, with a stated goal within the Florida Transportation Plan of zero fatalities
across the state’s transportation system. FDOT adopted their Strategic Highway Safety Plan in 2016,
which provides more information about how the state intends to address transportation safety in the
coming years.
Since the MPOs are being asked to report on and monitor their progress against their adopted safety
performance measures, MPOs need to account in their UPWP for the effort necessary to satisfy these
federal requirements. Additionally, MPOs are encouraged to consider how to expand upon the level of
analysis and reporting required by the performance measurement process to further study their unique
safety challenges. This approach may include the identification of safety needs in the MPO’s LRTP or
TIP, stand-alone safety studies for areas or corridors, or safety considerations within modal planning
elements.
System Connectivity
Connectivity is a concept that is emphasized both at the federal and state levels. Within the FAST Act,
one of the ten planning factors states, “enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation
system, across and between modes, for people and freight.” Within the Florida Transportation Plan,
system connectivity is addressed within four different goals.
• Make our economy more competitive
• Increase opportunities for access to transit and other modes
• Provide a more efficient and mobile transportation system
• Meet the needs of a growing and changing population
A connected system is often more cost-effective and better able to address natural and manmade
constraints.
For MPOs, system connectivity should be considered within several contexts. First, MPOs should
emphasize connectivity within their boundaries to serve the unique needs of their urban and non-urban
jurisdictions. This requires coordination with member jurisdictions to identify their connectivity needs
while also understanding how current and future land uses impact or can help augment connectivity.
Second, MPOs should consider connectivity beyond their boundaries and emphasize continuity on
those facilities that link their MPO to other metropolitan and non-urban or rural areas. Third,
connectivity for MPOs should include multimodal linkages that are supportive of both passengers and
4.E.1
Packet Pg. 97 Attachment: FY 2020/21-2021/22 UPWP (12550 : Ratify the Chair’s Approval of the FY 2020/21-2021/22 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
10
freight. A connected network supports users traveling by a variety of modes, including first and last
mile linkages.
Resilience
With the passage of the FAST Act, resilience was introduced as a federal planning factor: “Improve
the resilience and reliability of the transportation system and mitigate stormwater impacts of surface
transportation.” Resilience is defined as the ability to adapt to changing conditions and prepare for,
withstand, and recover from disruption. These conditions can encompass a wide variety of
environmental, technological, economic, or social impacts.
MPOs can address resilience within their planning processes by leveraging tools such as the FHWA
Resilience and Transportation Planning guide and the FDOT Quick Guide: Incorporating Resilience in
the MPO LRTP. It should be noted that while these documents focus primarily on the development of
MPO LRTPs and TIPs, addressing resilience should be a consideration within every planning
document prepared by an MPO. MPOs should place a particular emphasis on coordination with agency
partners responsible for natural disaster risk reduction, or who may be developing local resilience
planning initiatives. Additionally, MPOs should consider the additional costs associated with reducing
vulnerability of the existing transportation infrastructure. Proactive resiliency planning will help the
MPO develop planning documents that are ultimately more realistic and cost-effective.
ACES (Automated/Connected/Electric/Shared-use) Vehicles
According to the Federal Highway Administration, “Transportation is in the midst of disruptive change
from new technologies (automated and connected vehicles); new institutions (shared mobility firms);
and changing attitudes (reduced car ownership). Across the nation, transportation planners are under
pressure to develop performance-oriented policies, plans, and investment decisions that consider an
increasingly complex transportation landscape. In the process, planners need to consider, but cannot
yet reliably predict, the potential impact of disruptive and transformational Connected Vehicle (CV)
and Automated Vehicle (AV) technologies on safety, vehicle ownership, road capacity, VMT, land-
use, roadway design, future investment demands, and economic development, among others. While
some forms of CV and AV are already being deployed across the United States, significant unknowns
exist regarding the rate of technology adoption, which types of technologies will prevail in the
marketplace, the interaction between CV/AV vehicles and various forms of shared mobility services,
and the impacts of interim and widespread levels of CV/AV usage.”
Adopting and supporting innovative technologies and business practices supports all seven goals of the
Florida Transportation Plan and the federal planning factors found in the FAST Act. ACES may lead
to great improvements in safety, transportation choices, and quality of life for Floridians, our visitors,
and the Florida economy. Though there is a great deal of speculation and uncertainty of the potential
impacts these technologies will have, MPOs need to determine how best to address the challenges and
opportunities presented to them by ACES vehicles.
Federal Planning Factors
In December 2015, the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act was signed into law. The
FAST act identified the following ten planning factors which have been incorporated into the MPO
Planning Process and this UPWP:
4.E.1
Packet Pg. 98 Attachment: FY 2020/21-2021/22 UPWP (12550 : Ratify the Chair’s Approval of the FY 2020/21-2021/22 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
11
1. Support the economic vitality of the metropolitan area, especially by enabling global
competitiveness, productivity, and efficiency;
2. Increase the safety of the transportation system for motorized and non-motorized users;
3. Increase the security of the transportation system for motorized and non-motorized users;
4. Increase the accessibility and mobility of people and for freight;
5. Protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, improve the quality of
life, and promote consistency between transportation improvements and State and local
planned growth and economic development patterns;
6. Enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system, across and between
modes, for people and freight;
7. Promote efficient system management and operation;
8. Improve the resiliency and reliability of the transportation system and reduce or mitigate
stormwater impacts of surface transportation;
9. Enhance travel and tourism; and,
10. Emphasize the preservation of the existing transportation system
In addition to the planning factors noted above, MAP-21 required that State DOTs and MPOs conduct
performance-based planning by tracking performance measures and setting data-driven targets to
improve those measures. Performance-based planning ensures the most efficient investment of federal
transportation funds by increasing accountability, transparency, and providing for better investment
decisions that focus on key outcomes related to seven national goals which include:
• Improving Safety;
• Maintaining Infrastructure Condition;
• Reducing Traffic Congestion;
• Improving the Efficiency of the System and Freight Movement;
• Protecting the Environment; and,
• Reducing Delays in Project Delivery.
The FAST Act supplemented the MAP-21 legislation by establishing timelines for State DOTs and
MPOs to comply with the requirements of MAP-21. State DOTs are required to establish statewide
targets and MPOs have the option to support the statewide targets or adopt their own. The Collier
MPO has chosen to support the statewide targets. The transition to performance-based planning is
ongoing and has been addressed within the tasks identified in this UPWP, specifically within the LRTP,
the TIP, and the TSPR. The Collier MPO intends to coordinate with FDOT and member agencies to
fully comply with the performance-based planning requirements.
4.E.1
Packet Pg. 99 Attachment: FY 2020/21-2021/22 UPWP (12550 : Ratify the Chair’s Approval of the FY 2020/21-2021/22 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
12
ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT
OF THE
METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION
IDENTIFICATION OF MPO PARTICIPANTS
The Collier MPO is the primary agency responsible for transportation planning in Collier County. The
MPO Board consists of nine voting members, representing the county government and three local
municipalities, and one non-voting representative from the FDOT. The MPO is a legislative body with
the power to develop and adopt plans, and to set priorities for the programming of improvements to
the transportation system. The MPO membership includes the following:
COLLIER COUNTY
Commissioner Donna Fiala, District 1
Commissioner Andy Solis., District 2
Commissioner Burt Saunders, District 3
Commissioner Penny Taylor, District 4
Commissioner William L. McDaniel, Jr., District 5
CITY OF NAPLES
Councilman Mike McCabe
Councilman Paul Perry
CITY OF MARCO ISLAND
Councilman Erik Brechnitz
CITY OF EVERGLADES CITY
Councilwoman Elaine Middelstaedt
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
L.K. Nandam, District Secretary, District One
The MPO Board is served by five advisory committees. The advisory committees are summarized as
follows:
Technical Advisory Committee (TAC)
The MPO’s TAC is composed of technically qualified representatives of agencies responsible for
directing, developing and improving the transportation system within the Collier County Metropolitan
Planning Area. Committee duties include the coordination of transportation planning and
programming activities arising from the review of all transportation technical studies and reports
submitted to them.
4.E.1
Packet Pg. 100 Attachment: FY 2020/21-2021/22 UPWP (12550 : Ratify the Chair’s Approval of the FY 2020/21-2021/22 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
13
Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC)
The MPO’s CAC is composed of thirteen (13) individuals representing a cross-section of the
geographic community and special interests, such as minorities and persons with disabilities. They are
recruited to represent the City of Naples, the City of Marco Island, the City of Everglades City and the
County Commission Districts of the unincorporated areas of the county. The CAC provides the MPO
Board and staff with the citizen’s perspective on the multimodal transportation planning process. The
CAC is the focal point of the MPO’s public involvement process.
Bicycle & Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC)
The MPO’s BPAC is composed of eleven (11) at-large voting members representing a wide cross-
section of Collier County residents and neighborhoods, bicycle and pedestrian safety professionals,
Safe Routes to Schools organizations, transit riders, local bicycle and pedestrian advocacy groups,
organizations that encourage active transportation from a community health perspective, and advocates
for persons with disabilities and other transportation disadvantaged populations.
The committee is responsible for providing citizen input into the deliberations of bicycle and pedestrian
related issues within the community and to advise the MPO on developing a Bicycle and Pedestrian
Plan. The BPAC is also involved in recommending priorities for bicycle and pedestrian projects and
program implementation.
Congestion Management Committee (CMC)
The CMC serves the MPO in an advisory capacity on technical matters relating to the update of the
MPO’s Congestion Management System and the coordination of the CMS with the regional ITS
architecture. The committee is responsible for creating and amending the Congestion Management
Process (CMP) and for prioritizing candidate CMS projects to be funded from the MPO’s CMS boxed
funds.
Local Coordinating Board for the Transportation Disadvantaged (LCB)
The LCB for the Transportation Disadvantaged (TD) has been appointed by the MPO to carry out the
duties described in Rule 41-2, Florida Administrative Code, as an integral part of the TD planning and
delivery service program.
The LCB is composed of representatives from various State and local agencies, as well as citizen
representatives. A member of the MPO Board is appointed to serve as the LCB’s Chairman.
OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES AND BYLAWS
The MPO operates under an adopted set of Bylaws. The MPO Executive Director reports directly to the
MPO Board. The additional MPO staff members are Collier County employees pursuant to a staff services
agreement. Administrative services are provided by Collier County under the rules and procedures of
Collier County and the State of Florida. Annual audits of the MPO Program are performed as part of the
single audit process under the direction of the Clerk of Courts Finance Department.
4.E.1
Packet Pg. 101 Attachment: FY 2020/21-2021/22 UPWP (12550 : Ratify the Chair’s Approval of the FY 2020/21-2021/22 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
14
Official records of MPO business are maintained in the MPO Offices located in the Collier County
Growth Management Division, 2885 South Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104. All MPO records
are available for public inspection during normal business hours.
The Collier MPO’s operational procedures fully comply with the public records laws and the Sunshine
Laws of the State of Florida.
EXECUTED AGREEMENTS
The MPO has various agreements in place with State and local governments and agencies that promote
the “3-C” planning process. The following is a list of agreements currently in place:
• Amended and Restated Interlocal Agreement for the Creation of the Collier County MPO –
FDOT, City of Naples, City of Marco Island, City of Everglades City, Collier County (2/26/15)
• Metropolitan Planning Organization Agreement – FDOT/MPO (7/1/20) – Agreement for
planning funding.
• Staff Services Agreement – MPO/Collier County (5/28/19)
• Lease Agreement – MPO/Collier County (5/28/19)
• Interlocal Agreement – Lee and Collier MPO regional coordination (amended 3/20/09)
• Intergovernmental Coordination and Review (ICAR) and Public Transportation Coordination
Joint Participation Agreement – FDOT/MPO/Collier County Airport Authority, Naples Airport
Authority/ Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council (11/25/14)
• Public Transportation Joint Participation Agreement – FDOT/MPO (11/10/15)
• Public Transit Grant Agreement – FDOT/MPO (5/6/2019)
These agreements are currently under review and will be updated as appropriate. Current executed
agreements can be accessed by visiting the Collier MPO website at https://www.colliermpo.org/mpo-
agreements-resolutions/.
CERTIFICATIONS AND ASSURANCES
All required certifications and assurances are included in this document in Appendix C.
STATE/FEDERAL PLANNING EMPHASIS AREA MATRIX
The FY 2020/21-2021/22 Federal Planning Factors and FDOT’s Planning Emphasis Areas matrix is
included in this document in the tables section of this document on page 47.
4.E.1
Packet Pg. 102 Attachment: FY 2020/21-2021/22 UPWP (12550 : Ratify the Chair’s Approval of the FY 2020/21-2021/22 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
15
UPWP TASK OVERVIEW
The FY 2020/21-2021/22 UPWP covers the fiscal years starting July 1, 2020 and ending June 30,
2022. The specific planning activities to be undertaken over the next two years by MPO staff are
organized into eight tasks, each of which includes individual activities. A brief overview of each of
these tasks is provided below:
1. Administration
Administrative tasks provide for the primary management of MPO activities, including but not
limited to, staff time to organize and conduct MPO Board and advisory committee meetings, public
involvement efforts, and to participate in intergovernmental activities. In addition, this section
includes all necessary expenditures to maintain operations, capital expenditures, Federal and State
compliance documentation and all fiscally related tasks such as audits, progress reporting,
maintenance of financial records, and the preparation of annual administrative reports, such as the
UPWP, are also included.
2. Data Collection / Development
Task activities in this section includes those needed to monitor and analyze travel behavior and
factors affecting travel, such as socio-economic, land use, environmental, air quality, safety,
security and freight and transportation system data. Evaluation of the data collected in this section
is used for both long and short range planning for the transportation system.
3. Transportation Improvement Program Maintenance and Development
This task annually provides for the development of the TIP, a five-year program of transportation
improvements. The TIP will be developed in cooperation with FDOT and the local governments.
Transportation projects will be drawn from the currently adopted MPO Long Range Transportation
Plan to ensure the program’s consistency relative to priorities and financial constraints. The
prioritization methodology for each State and Federal funding project category will be detailed in
the introduction of each pertinent section of the TIP. Regionally significant projects, regardless of
funding source, are also included in the Transportation Improvement Program. The TIP also
includes a list of multi-modal unfunded State, county and municipal projects that have been
prioritized by the MPO Board.
Task activities in this section include establishing project priorities, annually updating the TIP and
reviewing transportation plans and reports for use in many other UPWP sections and tasks,
including short range planning, the Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP), Transit Planning, and
project planning.
4. Long Range Planning
Updates and amendments to the LRTP include multi-modal aspects of transportation planning such
as highway planning, transit planning, reviewing enhancement priorities, bicycle/pedestrian
programming, and congestion monitoring of the Systems Planning area. This section is intended
4.E.1
Packet Pg. 103 Attachment: FY 2020/21-2021/22 UPWP (12550 : Ratify the Chair’s Approval of the FY 2020/21-2021/22 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
16
UPWP TASK OVERVIEW (cont.)
to work with the other sections of the UPWP in the development, review, amending and updating
of the Long Range Transportation Plan.
5. Special Projects and Systems Planning
This task includes various recurring and non-recurring planning projects, including bicycle and
pedestrian planning support and congestion management planning. Bicycle and Pedestrian
planning and support are conducted in order to provide a balanced transportation system to ensure
that non-motorized travel options are safe, convenient and offer recreational opportunities. As part
of the Congestion Management Process, a recurring Transportation System Performance Report
will be completed in the second year of the UPWP.
6. Transit & Transportation Disadvantaged Planning
The UPWP addresses the continuing efforts of the Transit Program and Transportation
Disadvantaged (TD) Program. Transit support is provided in order to develop the LRTP, TIP and
other plans, programs and technical studies relating to public transportation. In addition, planning
services are provided to ensure a coordinated Transportation Disadvantaged (TD) Program in
Collier County.
7. Regional Coordination
This task provides for the creation of a region-wide multimodal transportation planning process in
accordance with Federal and State guidelines to ensure the coordination of transportation planning
and policy activities in FDOT District One. This includes travel expenditures, room rental, and
any other necessary costs for regional planning.
8. Locally Funded Activities
This task allows staff to complete requests to prepare resolutions and policy position statements
which are not eligible for grant reimbursement. In addition, travel expenses that are not eligible
for grant reimbursement will be funded from this task.
4.E.1
Packet Pg. 104 Attachment: FY 2020/21-2021/22 UPWP (12550 : Ratify the Chair’s Approval of the FY 2020/21-2021/22 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
17
TASK 1 ADMINISTRATION
PURPOSE:
To conduct activities (including staff travel and capital expenses) including the development and
maintenance of administrative reports and grants contract administration. This task also includes all
public involvement activities and administrative support for MPO planning and programs in general,
including assistance to Federal, State and local agency staff, as needed. It provides for the
administration of the area-wide multimodal transportation planning process in accordance with Federal
and State requirements, and for the technical management over each project included in the UPWP.
PREVIOUS WORK:
• Ongoing administrative activities
• Staff support for MPO Board and Committee meetings
• Develop and Update the UPWP
• Update Staff Services Agreement and Lease Agreement
• Public Involvement activities in compliance with the Public Participation Plan
• Procurement Activities
• Quarterly invoicing request
• Monthly invoicing activities
• Update to Public Participation Plan in 2019 and 2020
• Re-designed MPO website
• Strategic Plan and Annual Report
REQUIRED ACTIVITIES:
Activity Deliverable(s) Target Date
Administer MPO Governing Board and
Advisory Committee meetings.
Agendas, minutes,
presentations
Ongoing
Prepare and adopt the two-year UPWP;
process modifications and amendments;
submit progress reports and invoices
FY 23-24 Adopted UPWP;
Progress reports; Invoices
May 2022
Quarterly
Monitor and update the annual Strategic
Plan and Annual Report.
Strategic Plan and Annual
Report
December -
Annually
Provide training for MPO staff and MPO
Governing Board members at
conferences, workshops, etc. Attend
business meetings as required.
Enhanced knowledge of
MPO staff and Board
members which will assist
the MPO planning process;
Completed travel forms
As needed
Perform grant and financial tasks
including preparing grant agreements,
grant compliance tasks, grant
reimbursements, timekeeping, inventory,
contract management, invoice payment.
Agreements, FDOT audit,
payment of invoices
Ongoing
4.E.1
Packet Pg. 105 Attachment: FY 2020/21-2021/22 UPWP (12550 : Ratify the Chair’s Approval of the FY 2020/21-2021/22 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
18
Activity Deliverable(s) Target Date
Participate in joint FDOT/MPO annual
certification reviews.
Responses to certification
questions
March -
Annually
Participate in the 2020 Federal
Certification review.
Certification December 2020
Procure services, supplies, and equipment
(including computers, iPads, and
software purchase and licensing) (RFP’s,
purchase orders, contracts, etc.). This
may include the lease of necessary office
equipment (printers, copiers, etc.)
Executed Contracts, work
orders, and purchase orders
As needed
Review and maintain existing
agreements, by-laws, and COOP. Modify
as necessary to stay in compliance with
federal/state rules and laws.
Agreements As needed
Maintain the Public Participation Plan
(PPP) and update as necessary. Conduct
all activities to maintain compliance with
plan including to maintain and update
website, legal ads, press releases, etc.
PPP, legal ads, press releases Ongoing
Public Service Announcement (PSA) or
other Safety Campaign. This will be in
addition to the MPO’s Public
Participation Process and will require
consultant/ marketing services.
Safety video or material December 2021
Monitor progress towards goals,
including Disadvantaged Business
Enterprise (DBE) goals and ensure
compliance with DBE policy.
DBE Reports Annually
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Collier MPO, Consultant Services
4.E.1
Packet Pg. 106 Attachment: FY 2020/21-2021/22 UPWP (12550 : Ratify the Chair’s Approval of the FY 2020/21-2021/22 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
19
Task 1 - Financial Tables
Task 1 - Administration
Estimated Budget Detail for FY 2020/21
Budget
Category
Budget Category
Description
FHWA FHWA FTA FTA State
Match
FTA Local
Match
Trans.
Disad. Total
(PL) (SU) 5303
A. Personnel Services
MPO staff salaries, fringe benefits, and other deductions $294,888 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $294,888
Subtotal: $294,888 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $294,888
B. Consultant Services
Website maintenance, hosting fees, transcriptionist, etc. $8,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,,000
PSA or Safety Campaign $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000
Subtotal: $108,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $108,000
C. Travel
Travel and Professional Development $4,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,000
Subtotal: $4,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,000
D. Other Direct Expenses
Building or room Rental/lease $14,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $14,000
Insurance $4,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,000
Cellular Telephone Access and expenses $1,200 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,200
General Copying Expenses, equipment lease, printing charges, computer purchase, software purchase, repairs and maintenance $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,000
General Office Supplies $3,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,000
Legal Advertising $2,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,000
Motor Pool Rental and Car Maintenance /expenses $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,000
Postage, business reply permit, freight expenses, etc. $1,200 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,200
Telephone Access, expenses and system maintenance $500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500
Subtotal: $40,900 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $40,900
Total: $447,788 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $447,788
4.E.1
Packet Pg. 107 Attachment: FY 2020/21-2021/22 UPWP (12550 : Ratify the Chair’s Approval of the FY 2020/21-2021/22 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
20
Task 1 - Administration
Estimated Budget Detail for FY 2021/22
Budget Category &
Description
FHWA FHWA FTA FTA
State
Match
FTA
Local
Match
Trans.
Disad. Total (PL) (SU) 5303
A. Personnel Services MPO staff salaries, fringe benefits, and other deductions $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000
Subtotal: $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000
B. Consultant Services Website maintenance, hosting fees, transcriptionist, etc. $2,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,000
Subtotal: $2,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,000
C. Travel Travel and Professional Development $3,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,000
Subtotal: $3,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,000
D. Other Direct Expenses Building or room Rental/lease $14,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $14,000 Insurance $4,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,000 Cellular Telephone Access and expenses $500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500 General Copying Expenses, equipment lease, software purchase, printing charges, repairs and maintenance $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,000 General Office Supplies $3,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,000 Legal Advertising $2,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,000 Motor Pool Rental and Car Maintenance /expenses $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,000 Postage, business reply permit, freight expenses, etc. $1,200 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,200 Telephone Access, expenses and system maintenance $500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500
Subtotal: $40,200 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $40,200
Total: $345,200 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $345,200
4.E.1
Packet Pg. 108 Attachment: FY 2020/21-2021/22 UPWP (12550 : Ratify the Chair’s Approval of the FY 2020/21-2021/22 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
21
TASK 2 DATA COLLECTION / DEVELOPMENT
PURPOSE:
Develop and monitor the multimodal transportation system to preserve capacity, maximize personal
mobility and freight movement, ensure user safety and system security, and maintain the transportation
system’s integrity. Evaluate the system’s operating efficiency and conditions to assess current needs,
validate the long-range transportation planning model by looking at shorter range tasks, project future
travel demand, and identify future improvements. Coordination with local agencies, jurisdictions and
municipalities when reviewing and updating the forecasts and plans is essential. Update GIS database
to address current conditions related, but not limited to: functional classification; roadway network for
District One Regional Transportation Demand Model purposes; bicycle & pedestrian facilities
inventory; and prepare various overlays for analytical purposes. Coordinate with Collier County staff
on use of the County’s Interactive Growth Model (CIGM) in analyzing amendments and updates to the
Long Range Transportation Plan.
PREVIOUS WORK:
• Developed LRTP map in GIS depicting the land use “vision” including regional transit routes
and regional nonmotorized transportation corridors.
• Developed several GIS maps for bike/pedestrian planning activities.
• Updated socio-economic data for amendment to 2040 LRTP.
• Updated socio-economic data and TAZ structures for the 2045 LRTP Update.
REQUIRED ACTIVITIES:
Activity Deliverable(s) Target Date
Update TAZs and socioeconomic data
through development of 2045 LRTP
Completed data files
transmitted to FDOT
March 2021
Consultant services will be required to update
the 2045 LRTP Travel Model. Model
development is a collaborative process
between the MPO and FDOT. Final model
documentation must be transmitted to FDOT
upon completion and adoption of the LRTP.
Completed data files
transmitted to FDOT
March 2021
Coordinate with the County staff on updates
to the County Interactive Growth Model
(CIGM) so that both entities (County and
MPO) are using the most current and accurate
TAZ structure and socioeconomic data
available
Upon completion and
adoption of 2045 LRTP,
shared use of updated CIGM
TAZ structure and
socioeconomic data;
followed by periodic updates
as needed, prompted either by
MPO or County staff
analysis, changes in BCC
policies, etc.
March 2021
and as needed
thereafter
4.E.1
Packet Pg. 109 Attachment: FY 2020/21-2021/22 UPWP (12550 : Ratify the Chair’s Approval of the FY 2020/21-2021/22 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
22
Activity Deliverable(s) Target Date
Coordinate with County staff on the County's
Crash Data Management System (CDMS) so
that both entities (County and MPO) are using
the most current and accurate crash data
available
Updated CDMS upon
completion and adoption of
Transportation System
Performance Report and
Action Plan; periodic updates
as needed, prompted either by
MPO or County staff
analysis,
March 2021
and as needed
thereafter
Perform data collection and analysis to
implement Transportation System
Performance Report, for example - collect
traffic counts of turning movements at
congested intersections, analyze and report on
LOS
data collection, database
development and
management, analysis,
reports and presentations,
maps and other graphics
June 2022 and
as needed
thereafter
Review and provide travel demand model
information such as Annual Average Daily
Traffic (AADT) and volume-to-capacity
rations for planning documents, other agency
and citizen's requests
responses to questions from
planning partners, citizen's
including reports, maps,
graphics
As needed
Prepare and maintain GIS files, prepare and
maintain maps
responses to questions from
planning partners, citizen's
including reports, maps,
graphics As needed
Participate in 2020 US Census as needed;
review preliminary data releases and reports
Briefings for advisory
committees, MPO Board and
postings to website for
general public information
As needed
Coordinate with County and Municipalities to
review and comment on Local policy issues,
such as Land Development Code and Growth
Management Plan regulations as it relates to
the Long Range Transportation Plan.
Responses to request for
comments
As needed
Continue coordination with jurisdictions,
agencies and municipalities within Collier
County and adjacent to Collier County on
community master plans, transportation
system plans, multi-modal mobility plans,
Local Road Safety Plan etc. and the data used
to update and maintain such information.
Response to comments as
requested
As needed
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Collier MPO, Consultant Services
4.E.1
Packet Pg. 110 Attachment: FY 2020/21-2021/22 UPWP (12550 : Ratify the Chair’s Approval of the FY 2020/21-2021/22 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
23
Task 2 - Financial Tables
Task 2 – DATA COLLECTION/DEVELOPMENT
Estimated Budget Detail for FY 2020/21
Budget Category &
Description
FHWA FHWA FTA FTA State
Match
FTA Local
Match
Trans.
Disad. Total (PL) (SU) 5303
A. Personnel Services MPO staff salaries, fringe benefits, and other deductions $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,000
Subtotal: $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,000
B. Consultant Services Contract/Consultant Services $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $15,000
Subtotal $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $15,000
Total: $25,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $25,000
Task 2 – DATA COLLECTION/DEVELOPMENT
Estimated Budget Detail for FY 2021/22
Budget Category &
Description
FHWA FHWA FTA FTA State
Match
FTA Local
Match
Trans.
Disad. Total (PL) (SU) 5303
A. Personnel Services MPO staff salaries, fringe benefits, and other deductions $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,000
Subtotal: $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,000
B. Consultant Services Contract/Consultant Services $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $15,000
Subtotal $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $15,000
Total: $25,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $25,000
4.E.1
Packet Pg. 111 Attachment: FY 2020/21-2021/22 UPWP (12550 : Ratify the Chair’s Approval of the FY 2020/21-2021/22 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
24
TASK 3 TIP MONITORING AND DEVELOPMENT
PURPOSE:
Develop Multimodal Transportation Improvement Programs (TIP) for FY 2021/2022-2025/2026 and
FY 2022/23-2026/27 that identify all Federal, State, and locally funded transportation improvements
consistent with the requirements of Federal and State laws. Coordinate with FDOT and member
agencies to address integration of MAP-21 and FAST Performance Management Measures in the TIP.
This section also includes transportation system planning tasks related to contingency of operations
and short-range transportation planning and programming.
PREVIOUS WORK:
• Coordinated with agencies and jurisdictions on transportation plans and programs.
• Annual preparation of TIP and TIP amendments.
• Annual list of project priorities for inclusion in the TIP.
REQUIRED ACTIVITIES
Activity Deliverable(s) Target Date
Develop annual project priorities identifying
unfunded highway, transit, bicycle and
pedestrian, planning and congestion
management projects that are prioritized by the
MPO. This activity includes review of
applications and associated activities.
Submitted applications to FDOT
Annual Project Priority Lists
February – Annually
June – Annually
Review FDOT Draft Tentative Work Program
and Tentative Work Program for consistency
with the LRTP and adopted priorities of the
MPO Board
Review letter if necessary Annually
Prepare and adopt the TIP. This includes
coordinating all efforts with FDOT, local
agencies, jurisdictions and the STIP.
Adopted TIP
June – 2021
June - 2022
Prepare and process any requested
amendments. This includes reviewing
amendments for consistency with the TIP and
LRTP.
Transmitted amendment packages As needed
Coordinate with FDOT and member agencies to
address integration of FAST Performance
Management Measures in performance based
planning.
Transmitted adopted performance
measures
Annually
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Collier MPO
4.E.1
Packet Pg. 112 Attachment: FY 2020/21-2021/22 UPWP (12550 : Ratify the Chair’s Approval of the FY 2020/21-2021/22 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
25
Task 3 - Financial Tables
Task 3 - TIP
Estimated Budget Detail for FY 2021/22
Budget Category & Description
FHWA FHWA FTA FTA State
Match
FTA Local
Match
Trans.
Disad. Total (PL) (SU) 5303
A. Personnel Services MPO staff salaries, fringe benefits, and other deductions $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,000
Subtotal: $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,000
Total: $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,000
Task 3 - TIP
Estimated Budget Detail for FY 2020/21
Budget Category & Description
FHWA FHWA FTA FTA State
Match
FTA Local
Match
Trans.
Disad. Total (PL) (SU) 5303
A. Personnel Services MPO staff salaries, fringe benefits, and other deductions $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,000
Subtotal: $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,000
Total: $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,000
4.E.1
Packet Pg. 113 Attachment: FY 2020/21-2021/22 UPWP (12550 : Ratify the Chair’s Approval of the FY 2020/21-2021/22 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
26
TASK 4 LONG RANGE PLANNING
PURPOSE:
To finalize the update to the 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan and to continue to evaluate plans
and programs for consistency with the 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) during
development of the plan. FAST Act Performance measures will be integrated into the 2045 LRTP as
required. This task will work in coordination with other tasks throughout the UPWP, including
Administration, Data Collection/Development, and Transit and Transportation Disadvantaged.
PREVIOUS WORK:
• Amendment to the 2040 LRTP which reallocated socio-economic data, added a project to the
needs network and reallocated funding to projects on the cost feasible plan.
• Public Involvement Plan for the 2045 LRTP.
• Prepared and advertised the first survey for the 2045 LRTP.
• 2045 Existing + Committed network data for Collier MPO area
• Updates socio-economic data and TAZ structures for the 2045 LRTP update
• Began drafting chapters of elements for inclusion in the 2045 LRTP, including ACES and
resiliency.
REQUIRED TASKS:
Activity Deliverable(s) Target Date
Review projects and studies as needed for
consistency with MPO plans.
Consistency letter As needed
Continue to incorporate the Efficient
Transportation Decision Making
(ETDM) Process into the Long Range
Multimodal transportation planning
process. Continue to work with FDOT to
review projects for the ETDM process as
they relate to LRTP projects and priorities
and to provide project specific comments
as part of the ETDM process. Review
purpose and needs statements for projects
and provide comments.
Recommendations or
comments
As needed
Attend meetings and participate on
committees of FDOT District 1 Regional
Transportation/Planning Model (RPM)
Coordinating Committee, GIS Users
Groups, Florida Standard Urban
Transportation Model Structure
Working knowledge of the
FSUTMS model which will
help The MPO address
requests for information
related to the model;
Attendance and participation
at meetings/ Travel Forms
As needed
4.E.1
Packet Pg. 114 Attachment: FY 2020/21-2021/22 UPWP (12550 : Ratify the Chair’s Approval of the FY 2020/21-2021/22 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
27
Activity Deliverable(s) Target Date
(FSUTMS) Users Groups, and others as
needed. Participate in FSUTMS training.
Continue to execute the Public
Participation Plan for the 2045 LRTP
Public meetings, surveys,
website postings, summary
included in 2045 LRTP
All feedback received
through the public
participation process will
enhance the 2045 LRTP.
December 2020
Prepare revenue projections for the 2045
LRTP
Revenue Projections December 2020
Incorporate Transportation Performance
Measures into 2045 LRTP. Monitor and
report on targets upon request by FDOT.
Appendix or element
included in 2045 LRTP
December 2020
As needed
Develop alternatives for the 2045 Needs
Plan
Adopted 2045 Needs Plan September 2020
Develop alternatives for 2045 Cost
Feasible Plan
Adopted 2045 Cost Feasible
Plan
October 2020
Develop the draft and final 2045 LRTP Draft 2045 LRTP
Adopted 2045 LRTP
November 2020
December 2020
Participate in freight planning, including
updates to the regional freight plan,
participation in various freight
committees, and coordination with
freight stakeholder
Enhanced freight planning
for the 2045 LRTP;
Attendance at meetings,
Agendas, Travel Forms
As needed
Participate in on-going studies related to
climate change and vulnerability
Attendance at meetings/
Maps and graphics related to
resiliency for the 2045 LRTP
As needed
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Collier MPO, Consultant Services
4.E.1
Packet Pg. 115 Attachment: FY 2020/21-2021/22 UPWP (12550 : Ratify the Chair’s Approval of the FY 2020/21-2021/22 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
28
Task 4 - Financial Tables
Task 4 – Long Range Planning
Estimated Budget Detail for FY 2020/21
Budget Category &
Description
FHWA FHWA FTA FTA
State
Match
FTA
Local
Match
Trans.
Disad. Total (PL) (SU) 5305
A. Personnel Services MPO staff salaries, fringe benefits, and other deductions $35,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $35,000
Subtotal: $35,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $35,000
B. Consultant Services 2045 LRTP $20,000 $120,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $140,000
Subtotal: $20,000 $120,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $140,000
Total:
$55,000 $120,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $175,000
Task 4 – Long Range Planning
Estimated Budget Detail for FY 2021/22
Budget Category &
Description
FHWA FHWA
FTA
5305 FTA State
Match
FTA
Local
Match
Trans.
Disad. Total (PL) (SU)
A. Personnel Services MPO staff salaries, fringe benefits, and other deductions $35,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $35,000
Subtotal: $35,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $35,000
B. Consultant Services 2045 LRTP $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,000
Subtotal: $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,000
Total: $40,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $40,000
4.E.1
Packet Pg. 116 Attachment: FY 2020/21-2021/22 UPWP (12550 : Ratify the Chair’s Approval of the FY 2020/21-2021/22 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
29
TASK 5 SPECIAL PROJECTS AND SYSTEMS PLANNING
PURPOSE:
To complete various recurring and non-recurring planning projects. These projects will assist in
providing a balanced, multimodal transportation system.
PREVIOUS WORK:
• Annual Work Program priorities for construction of new sidewalks, pathways and bike lanes.
• Served as liaison to FDOT to communicate the need for bicycle and pedestrian facilities on
State roads.
• Began first Transportation System Performance Report. This report continues into this UPWP
for completion and will become recurring every two years.
• Began Local Road Safety Plan, which will continue into this UPWP for completion.
REQUIRED TASKS:
Activity Deliverable(s) Target Date
Participate in special events that promote
bicycle/pedestrian activities and safety
education.
Attendance and
participation, noted on
progress reports, travel
forms if outside of county
As needed
Participate in meetings/workshops
related to bicycle/pedestrian initiatives,
including those hosted by FDOT, FHWA,
CTST, Naples Pathway Coalition, Blue
Zones, Healthy Community Coalition of
Collier County, and other agencies.
Regional cooperation and
coordination; Enhanced
knowledge of MPO staff and
understanding of best
practices Attendance and
participation, noted on
progress reports, travel
forms if outside of county
Ongoing
Coordinate with FDOT and local
governments to ensure that roadway
expansion and retrofit projects work
towards meeting the bicycle/pedestrian
goals identified in the Bicycle and
Pedestrian Master Plan.
Comments on projects As needed
Attend and participate in workshops and
seminars sponsored by FHWA, FDOT
and other professional organizations as
appropriate
Enhanced knowledge of
MPO staff and
understanding of best
practices; Attendance and
participation, noted on
progress reports, travel
forms if outside of county
As needed
4.E.1
Packet Pg. 117 Attachment: FY 2020/21-2021/22 UPWP (12550 : Ratify the Chair’s Approval of the FY 2020/21-2021/22 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
30
Activity Deliverable(s) Target Date
Maintain and update the Bicycle
Pedestrian Master Plan
Bicycle Pedestrian Master
Plan
As needed
Coordinate with Lee MPO to maintain the
Non-Motorized element of the Regional
Transportation Network
Regional Non-motorized
Transportation Network
As needed
Analyze bike/ped facilities and crashes Crash Data As needed
Review Safe Routes to School Program
applications and prepare letter of support
Support letter As needed
Coordinate with MPO member
governments and School District
regarding data collection activities to
quantify number of bicyclists and
pedestrians at specific locations around
Collier County.
Data collected
As needed
Maintain and update the Collier
Bicycle/Pedestrian Facility Map
Bicycle/Pedestrian Map As needed
Coordinate with FDOT and member
agencies to address continued integration
of Performance Management measures
into Bicycle and Pedestrian Planning and
Congestion Management Planning
Compliance with Federal
Requirements
As Determined
by FDOT
Review and update the Congestion
Management Process
Congestion Management
Process
As needed
Complete first biennial Transportation
System Performance Report
Second Biennial TSPR
Completed TSPR
Completed TSPR
December 2020
June 2022
Attend Lee TMOC and
Collier/Lee/Charlotte TIM Team to the
extent feasible
Attendance and
Participation, noted on
progress report
Ongoing
Attend and participate in technical
meetings and workshops related to the
CMC, CMP and congestion relief
strategies
Attendance and
Participation, noted on
progress report
As needed
Complete a Local Road Safety Plan Completed LSPR November 2020
Facilitate “best practices” approach for
incorporating CMP measures into
existing plans and programs, including
preliminary engineering, traffic
simulation modeling, and project
prioritization.
Comments provided on
plans and programs as
requested
As needed
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Collier MPO, Consultant Services
4.E.1
Packet Pg. 118 Attachment: FY 2020/21-2021/22 UPWP (12550 : Ratify the Chair’s Approval of the FY 2020/21-2021/22 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
31
Task 5 – Financial Tables
Task 5 – Special Projects & Systems Planning
Estimated Budget Detail for FY 2020/21
Budget Category
& Description
FHWA FHWA FTA FTA
State
Match
FTA
Local
Match
Trans.
Disad. Total (PL) (SU) 5303
A. Personnel Services MPO staff salaries, fringe benefits, and other deductions $45,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $45,000
Subtotal: $45,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $45,000
B. Consultant Services Transportation System Performance Report $18,285 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $18,285 Local Road Safety Plan $0 $65,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $65,000
Subtotal: $18,285 $65,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $83,285
Total: $63,285 $65,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $128,285
Task 5 – Special Projects & Systems Planning
Estimated Budget Detail for FY 2021/22
Budget Category &
Description
FHWA FHWA FTA FTA
State
Match
FTA
Local
Match
Trans.
Disad. Total (PL) (SU) 5305
A. Personnel Services MPO staff salaries, fringe benefits, and other deductions $45,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $45,000
Subtotal: $45,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $45,000
B. Consultant Services Transportation System Performance Report $62,285 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $62,285
Subtotal: $62,285 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $62,285
Total: $107,285 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $107,285
4.E.1
Packet Pg. 119 Attachment: FY 2020/21-2021/22 UPWP (12550 : Ratify the Chair’s Approval of the FY 2020/21-2021/22 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
32
TASK 6 TRANSIT AND TRANSPORTATION DISADVANTAGED
PLANNING
PURPOSE:
To provide the necessary resources to support a multimodal transportation system in the Collier MPO
area. This task includes completing the Transit Development Plan, the 2045 Long Range
Transportation Plan, a multimodal TIP and other plans, programs and technical studies relating to
public transportation. This task includes coordination with the transit agency for the establishment of
transit asset management target measures and target setting for the required Public Transit Safety
Agency Plan. In addition, this task includes overseeing and providing planning services for a
coordinated Transportation Disadvantaged (TD) Program in Collier County, in accordance with
Chapter 427 of the Florida Statutes (FS) and Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.) Rule 41-2.
PREVIOUS WORK
• TDP Major Update – Carryover from last UPWP
• Park and Ride Study – Carryover from last UPWP
• Transit Impact Analysis – Carryover from last UPWP
• Coordinated with PTNE to review and adopt the Transit Asset Management Performance
Measures for the Collier Metropolitan Area.
• Ongoing transit and transportation disadvantaged coordination between the Collier MPO and
PTNE.
• Staff support to the Local Coordinating Board as required by the TD Planning Grant.
REQUIRED TASKS:
Activity Deliverable(s) Target Date
Conduct and maintain the operations of
the MPO including providing
administrative support activities such as
financial management, contract
management, public outreach, personnel
matters, procurement of equipment and
supplies and general management of
Transit Planning at the system level
within the MPO.
Office supplies; reports
Documented on progress
reports
Ongoing
MPO staff, Board, and PTNE staff will
participate in meetings, trainings,
workshops, or seminars related to fixed
route which may include fixed routes,
ADA or paratransit service.
Enhanced knowledge of
MPO and PTNE staff
understanding of best
practices; Completed Travel
Forms, Receipts, Progress
Reports
As needed
Project Management and Consultant
Services to complete the Transit
Development Plan Major Update. This is
Transit Development Plan
submitted to FDOT
September 2020
4.E.1
Packet Pg. 120 Attachment: FY 2020/21-2021/22 UPWP (12550 : Ratify the Chair’s Approval of the FY 2020/21-2021/22 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
33
Activity Deliverable(s) Target Date
a carryover from the previous fiscal year.
Provide comments on the annual reports
of the Transit Development Plan prepared
by PTNE
Comments on Annual
Report
June - Annually
Coordinate with PTNE on compliance
with all Federal requirements to address
transit performance measures including,
Transit Asset Management and Public
Transit Agency Safety Plan
Updated documents with
performance measures
included as required
As directed by
FDOT
Prepare and submit Section 5305(d) grant
application.
Prepare quarterly progress reports and
invoices.
Completed and submitted
application
Completed Progress Report
and invoice
Annually
Quarterly
Consultant and staff activities for a Park
and Ride study. This is carryover from
the previous fiscal year.
Park and Ride Study October 2020
Consultant activities for the 2045 LRTP.
Coordinate TDP and Park and Ride study
with 2045 LRTP. Elements of both
documents will be included in the LRTP
Multi-modal LRTP December 2020
Consultant and staff services to complete
the transit impact analysis. This is a
carryover from the previous fiscal year.
Completed study December 2020
Consultant and staff services to conduct a
study identified as a result of the TDP
major update (still to be determined)
Completed study
June 2022
Consultant services to complete a
Comprehensive Operational Analysis.
This is a PTNE study funded with 5307
funding and is shown for illustrative
purposes.
Completed study January 2021
Staff support to the LCB, including
preparation of agendas, preparation of
meeting materials including legal
advertisements of meetings.
Quarterly Ongoing
Complete TD activities as required by TD
Planning Grant, including annual updates
to TDSP, CTC Evaluation, annual review
of bylaws, completion of LCB training,
public workshop, etc.
TDSP Annual Report
CTC Evaluation
Bylaw Update
Public Workshop
LCB Board Training
June - Annual
June - Annual
May - Annual
March - Annual
March -Annual
Staff attendance at TD training and
workshops as required by the TD
planning grant
Sign in sheets, agendas,
travel forms
As needed
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Collier MPO, Collier County PTNE, Consultant Services
4.E.1
Packet Pg. 121 Attachment: FY 2020/21-2021/22 UPWP (12550 : Ratify the Chair’s Approval of the FY 2020/21-2021/22 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
34
Task 6 - Financial Tables
Task 6 – Transit & TD Planning
Estimated Budget Detail for FY 20/21
Budget Category
& Description
FTA 5305
Carry-
forward
FTA
State
Match
Carry-
forward
FTA Local
Match
Carry-
forward
FTA 5307
FFY 19
FTA 5305
FY 20/21
FTA State
Match
FY 20/21
FTA Local
Match
FY 20/21
Trans.
Disad. Total
A. Personnel Services MPO staff salaries, fringe benefits, and other deductions $23,264 $2,908 $2,908
$0 $48,000 $6,000 $6,000 $21,156 $110,236
Subtotal: $23,264 $2,908 $2,908
$0 $48,000 $6,000 $6,000 $21,156 $110,236
B. Consultant Services Transit Impact Analysis $32,800 $4,100 $4,100 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $41,000 Transit Element of the 2045 LRTP $36,000 $4,500 $4,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $45,000 TDP Major Update $52,501 $6,562 $6,562 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $65,625 Park and Ride $40,000 $5,000 $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $50,000 Transit Study – TBD after TDP Completion $0 $0 $0 $0 $58,984 $7,372 $7,372 $0 $73,728 Comprehensive Operational Analysis $0 $0 $0 $93,559 $0 $0 $0 $0 $93.559
Subtotal: $161,301 $20,162 $20,162 $93,559 $58,984 $7,372 $7,372 $0 $368,912
C. Travel MPO Staff and PTNE staff attendance at training and conferences $4,819 $602 $602 $0 $9,600 $1,200 $1,200 $2,000 $20,023
Subtotal: $4,819 $602 $602 $0 $9,600 $1,200 $1,200 $2,000 $20,023
D. Other Direct Expenses Legal Ads $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,760 $2,760 Website $240 $30 $30 $0 $240 $30 $30 $0 $600 Fed Ex/ Postage $120 $15 $15 $0 $120 $15 $15 $1,100 $1,400 Office Supplies $1,643 $206 $206 $0 $1,643 $206 $206 $0 $4,110
Subtotal: $2,003 $251 $251 $0 $2,003 $251 $251 $3,860 $8,870
Total: $191,387 $23,923 $23,923 $93,559 $118,587 $14,823 $14,823 $27,016 $508,041
4.E.1
Packet Pg. 122 Attachment: FY 2020/21-2021/22 UPWP (12550 : Ratify the Chair’s Approval of the FY 2020/21-2021/22 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
35
Task 6 – Transit & TD Planning
Estimated Budget Detail for FY 21/22
Budget Category &
Description
FTA 5305
Carry-
forward
5305
Carry-
forward
State
Match
5305
Carry-
forward
Local
Match FTA 5305 FTA State
Match
FTA Local
Match Trans. Disad. Total
A. Personnel Services MPO staff salaries, fringe benefits, and other deductions $0 $0
$0 $64,000 $8,000 $8,000 $21,156 $101,156
Subtotal: $0 $0 $0 $64,000 $8,000 $8,000 $21,156 $101,156
B. Consultant Services Transit Study – TBD after TDP Completion $0 $0
$0 $43,867 $5,483 $5,483 $0 $54,833
Subtotal: $0 $0 $0 $43,867 $5,483 $5,483 $0 $54,833
C. Travel MPO Staff and PTNE staff attendance at training and conferences $0 $0
$0 $9,600 $1,200 $1,200 $2,000 $14,000
Subtotal: $0 $0 $0 $9,600 $1,200 $1,200 $2,000 $14,000
D. Other Direct Expenses Legal Ads $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,760 $2,760 Website $0 $0 $0 $240 $30 $30 $0 $300 Fed Ex/ Postage $0 $0 $0 $80 $10 $10 $1,100 $1,200 Office Supplies $0 $0 $0 $800 $100 $100 $0 $1,000
Subtotal: $0 $0 $0 $1,120 $140 $140 $3,860 $5,260
Total: $0 $0
$0 $118,587 $14,823 $14,823 $27,016 $175,249
4.E.1
Packet Pg. 123 Attachment: FY 2020/21-2021/22 UPWP (12550 : Ratify the Chair’s Approval of the FY 2020/21-2021/22 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
36
TASK 7 REGIONAL COORDINATION
PURPOSE:
Provide for the continuation of a region-wide multimodal transportation planning process in
accordance with Federal and State guidelines. To provide training to MPO staff, Board members and
advisory committee members to support transportation planning and policy activities in the region.
PREVIOUS WORK:
• Represented the MPO at local, regional, State and Federal meetings, including quarterly
Metropolitan Planning Organization Advisory Council (MPOAC) meetings and Coordinated
Urban Transportation Studies (CUTS) meetings.
• Submitted freight projects to MPOAC for prioritization.
• Attendance at Lee MPO TAC and TMOC meetings.
• Conducted Joint Lee/Collier BPAC, CAC, TAC and MPO meets as needed.
• Updated Joint TRIP priorities and regional priorities with Lee County and submitted to FDOT.
REQUIRED ACTIVITIES:
Activity Deliverable(s) Target Date
Staff and MPO Board participation in
MPOAC meetings and workshops,
including freight meetings, noteworthy
practices meetings, and MPOAC
weekend institute for Governing Board
members
Regional Coordination;
Attendance, travel forms,
progress reports
Ongoing
Staff participation in CUTS meetings Regional Coordination;
Attendance and
participation, travel forms
Quarterly
Participation in Lee MPO TAC, BPAC,
and TMOC meetings
Regional Coordination;
Attendance and participation
Monthly, bi-
monthly
Monitoring of and continued
participation in statewide plans and
programs, including but not limited to
FTP, SIS, and Vision Zero
Regional Coordination and
enhanced knowledge of
statewide plans and
programs; Attendance and
participation, travel forms
As needed
Attendance at state and local
conferences/meetings on Collier MPO
related issues provided by FDOT,
FHWA, NHI, USDOT, NTI, etc.
Regional Coordination and
enhanced MPO staff
knowledge; Attendance and
participation, travel forms
As needed
Monitor and update joint priorities (TRIP,
SIS, enhancement, non-motorized) as
necessary. Ranks and priorities for
funding.
Approved joint priorities June - Annually
(as requested by
FDOT)
4.E.1
Packet Pg. 124 Attachment: FY 2020/21-2021/22 UPWP (12550 : Ratify the Chair’s Approval of the FY 2020/21-2021/22 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
37
Activity Deliverable(s) Target Date
Analysis of State and Federal laws and
regulations for MPOs, committees and
local government officials to aid them in
the application of regional transportation
policy strategies.
Update of laws and
regulations as needed
As needed
Coordinate with municipalities to review
local plans for consistency with MPO
plans.
Provided comments As needed
Participate in regional freight workshops
and seminars
Regional coordination and
enhanced system
connectivity planning;
Attendance and participation
As needed
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Collier MPO
4.E.1
Packet Pg. 125 Attachment: FY 2020/21-2021/22 UPWP (12550 : Ratify the Chair’s Approval of the FY 2020/21-2021/22 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
38
Task 7 - Financial Tables
Task 7- Regional Coordination
Estimated Budget Detail for FY 2020/21
Budget Category &
Description
FHWA FHWA FTA FTA State
Match
FTA Local
Match
Trans.
Disad. Total (PL) (SU) 5303
A. Personnel Services MPO staff salaries, fringe benefits, and other deductions $24,000 $0 0 0 0 0 $24,000
Subtotal: $24,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $24,000
B. Travel Travel to MPOAC and any other out of county activities as necessary $7,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,000
Subtotal: $7,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,000
Total: $31,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $31,000
Task 7- Regional Coordination
Estimated Budget Detail for FY 2021/22
Budget Category &
Description
FHWA FHWA FTA FTA State
Match
FTA Local
Match
Trans.
Disad. Total (PL) (SU) 5303
A. Personnel Services MPO staff salaries, fringe benefits, and other deductions $15,000 $0 0 0 0 0 $15,000
Subtotal: $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $15,000
B. Travel Travel to MPOAC and any other out of county activities as necessary $6,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,000
Subtotal: $6,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,000
Total: $21,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $21,000
4.E.1
Packet Pg. 126 Attachment: FY 2020/21-2021/22 UPWP (12550 : Ratify the Chair’s Approval of the FY 2020/21-2021/22 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
39
TASK 8 LOCALLY FUNDED ACTIVITIES
PURPOSE:
To cover any MPO expenses deemed not eligible or reimbursable by FHWA PL, TD or FTA Section
5305(d) funding.
PREVIOUS WORK:
• Reimbursement of travel and training expenses not eligible for reimbursement from the FHWA
PL, TD or FTA Section 5305(d) Grants, particularly Class C travel expenses.
• Payment for staff time to attend safety training and HR training required by Collier County.
REQUIRED TASKS:
Activity Deliverable(s) Target Date
Prepare resolutions and policy positions Resolutions and policies As needed
Attend training and travel not eligible for
grant reimbursement (i.e. Class C Travel)
Travel Form
As needed
Participate in Collier County required
Safety and HR training courses
HR maintained log of
courses
As needed
Payment of any shortfall of consultant or
personnel costs.
Paid invoices As needed
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Collier MPO
4.E.1
Packet Pg. 127 Attachment: FY 2020/21-2021/22 UPWP (12550 : Ratify the Chair’s Approval of the FY 2020/21-2021/22 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
40
Task 8 - Financial Tables
Task 8 - Locally Funded Activities
Estimated Budget Detail for FY 2021/22
Budget Category &
Description
FHWA FHWA FTA FTA State
Match
FTA Local
Match
Trans.
Disad.
Other
Total (PL) (SU) 5303
A. Miscellaneous Expenses
Resolutions and policy positions, travel, membership dues, and any other expenses not eligible for grant reimbursement $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,000 $8,000
Total: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,000 $8,000
Task 8 - Locally Funded Activities
Estimated Budget Detail for FY 2020/21
Budget Category &
Description
FHWA FHWA FTA FTA State
Match
FTA Local
Match
Trans.
Disad.
Other
Total (PL) (SU) 5303
A. Miscellaneous Expenses
Resolutions and policy positions, travel, membership dues, and any other expenses not eligible for grant reimbursement $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,000 $8,000
Total: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,000 $8,000
4.E.1
Packet Pg. 128 Attachment: FY 2020/21-2021/22 UPWP (12550 : Ratify the Chair’s Approval of the FY 2020/21-2021/22 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
41
SUMMARY TABLES
4.E.1
Packet Pg. 129 Attachment: FY 2020/21-2021/22 UPWP (12550 : Ratify the Chair’s Approval of the FY 2020/21-2021/22 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
4.E.1
Packet Pg. 130 Attachment: FY 2020/21-2021/22 UPWP (12550 : Ratify the Chair’s Approval of the FY 2020/21-2021/22
43
TABLE 1 – FY 2020/21 AGENCY PARTICIPATION
4.E.1
Packet Pg. 131 Attachment: FY 2020/21-2021/22 UPWP (12550 : Ratify the Chair’s Approval of the FY 2020/21-2021/22
44
TABLE 2 – FY 2020/21 FUNDING SOURCE
4.E.1
Packet Pg. 132 Attachment: FY 2020/21-2021/22 UPWP (12550 : Ratify the Chair’s Approval of the FY 2020/21-2021/22
45
TABLE 3 – FY 2021/22 AGENCY PARTICIPATION
4.E.1
Packet Pg. 133 Attachment: FY 2020/21-2021/22 UPWP (12550 : Ratify the Chair’s Approval of the FY 2020/21-2021/22
46
TABLE 4 – FY 2021/22 FUNDING SOURCE
4.E.1
Packet Pg. 134 Attachment: FY 2020/21-2021/22 UPWP (12550 : Ratify the Chair’s Approval of the FY 2020/21-2021/22
47
TABLE 5 – PLANNING FACTOR AND PEA MATRIX
The Planning Factors listed below are priority themes for the FHWA, the FTA and the FDOT. The matrix identifies which of the
Planning Factors and Emphasis Areas that will be considered in each of the UPWP Task activity.
Administration Data Collection
TIP Maintenance &
Development Long Range Planning
Special Projects &
Systems Planning
Transit &
Transportation
Disadvantaged
Planning
Regional
Coordination
Locally
Funded
Activities
1. Support the economic vitality of the metropolitan
area, especially by enabling global competitiveness,
productivity, and efficiency.
2. Increase the safety of the transportation system for
motorized and non-motorized users.
3. Increase the security of the transportation system for
motorized and non-motorized users.
4. Increase the accessibility and mobility of people and
for freight.
5. Protect and enhance the environment, promote
energy conservation, improve the quality of life, and
promote consistency between transportation
improvements and State and local planned growth and
economic development patterns.
6. Enhance the integration and connectivity of the
transportation system, across and between modes, for
people and freight.
7. Promote efficient system management and
operation.
8. Improve the resiliency and reliability of the
transportation system and reduce or mitigate
stormwater impacts of surface transportation.
9. Enhance travel and tourism.
10. Emphasize the preservation of the existing
transportation system.
11. Safety
12. System Connectivity
13. Resilience
14. ACES (Automated/Connected/Electric/Shared-use)
Vehicles
Federal Planning Factors
FDOT Planning Emphasis Areas
4.E.1
Packet Pg. 135 Attachment: FY 2020/21-2021/22 UPWP (12550 : Ratify the Chair’s Approval of the FY 2020/21-2021/22
48
APPENDICES
4.E.1
Packet Pg. 136 Attachment: FY 2020/21-2021/22 UPWP (12550 : Ratify the Chair’s Approval of the FY 2020/21-2021/22 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
49
APPENDIX A – COMMONLY USED ACRONYMS
Acronym Full Name
AADT Annual Average Daily Traffic
ADA Americans with Disability Act
AMPO Association of Metropolitan Planning Organizations
ARRA American Recovery and Reinvestment Act
AASHTO American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials
AUIR Annual Update and Inventory Report
BCC Board of County Commissioners
BPAC Bicycle & Pedestrian Advisory Committee
CAC Citizens Advisory Committee
CAT Collier Area Transit
CEMP County Emergency Management Plan
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
CIA Community Impact Assessment
CIE Capital Improvement Element
CIGM Collier Inter-Active Growth Model
CIP Capital Improvement Program
CMC Congestion Management Committee
CMP Congestion Management Process
CMS Congestion Management System
COA Comprehensive Operational Analysis
COOP Continuity of Operations Plan
CORSIM Corridor Simulation
CR County Road
CRA Community Redevelopment Agency
CTC Community Transportation Coordinator
CTD (Florida) Commission for the Transportation Disadvantaged
CTST Community Traffic Safety Team
CUTR Center for Urban Transportation Research
CUTS Coordinated Urban Transportation Studies
DBE Disadvantaged Business Enterprise
DOPA Designated Official Planning Agency
DRI Development of Regional Impact
EAR Evaluation and Appraisal Report
EMS Emergency Medical Services
ETAT Environmental Technical Advisory Team
ETDM Efficient Transportation Decision Making
F.A.C. Florida Administrative Code
FAP Federal Aid Program
FAST Fixing America’s Surface Transportation
FDOT Florida Department of Transportation
FHREDI Florida’s Heartland Rural Economic Development Initiative
4.E.1
Packet Pg. 137 Attachment: FY 2020/21-2021/22 UPWP (12550 : Ratify the Chair’s Approval of the FY 2020/21-2021/22 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
50
COMMONLY USED ACRONYMS
Acronym Full Name
FHWA Federal Highway Administration
FM Financial Management
FS Florida Statutes
FSUTMS Florida Standard Urban Transportation Model Structure
FTA Florida Transit Administration
FTP Florida Transportation Plan
FY Fiscal Year
GIS Geographical Information System
ICAR Intergovernmental Coordination and Review
ICE Intergovernmental Coordination Element
IJR Interchange Justification Report
IT Information Technology
ITS Intelligent Transportation Systems
JARC Job Access Reverse Commute
JPA Joint Participation Agreement
LAP Local Agency Program
LCB Local Coordinating Board for the Transportation Disadvantaged
LEP Limited English Proficiency
LinC Lee in Collier Transit Service
LOS Level of Service
LRTP Long Range Transportation Plan
MAP-21 Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century
MMP Master Mobility Plan
MMTPP Metropolitan Multimodal Transportation Planning Process
MPO Metropolitan Planning Organization (includes references to the organization,
MPO Board, Staff and Committees)
MPOAC Metropolitan Planning Organization Advisory Council
MPP Metropolitan Planning Program
NTD National Transit Database
PD&E Project Development & Environment
PEA Planning Emphasis Area
PIP Public Involvement Plan
PL Highway Planning Funds
PTNE Public Transit and Neighborhood Enhancement
PTOP Public Transportation Operation Plan
QRC Quick Response Code
RFP Request for Proposal
ROW Right-of-Way
SCE Sociocultural Effects
SE Socioeconomic
SHS State Highway System
SIS Strategic Intermodal System
SR State Road
4.E.1
Packet Pg. 138 Attachment: FY 2020/21-2021/22 UPWP (12550 : Ratify the Chair’s Approval of the FY 2020/21-2021/22 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
51
COMMONLY USED ACRONYMS
Acronym Full Name
SSPP System Safety Program Plan
SWFRPC Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council
TAC Technical Advisory Committee
TAZ Traffic Analysis Zone
TD Transportation Disadvantaged
TDM Transportation Demand Management
TDP Transit Development Plan
TDSP Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan
TIP Transportation Improvement Program
TMA Transportation Management Area
TSM Transportation Systems Management
TRIP Transportation Regional Incentive Program
ULAM Urban Land Allocation Model
UPWP Unified Planning Work Program
USC United States Code
USDOT United States Department of Transportation
UZA Urbanized Area
VE Value Engineering
ZDATA Zonal Data (land use and socio-economic)
4.E.1
Packet Pg. 139 Attachment: FY 2020/21-2021/22 UPWP (12550 : Ratify the Chair’s Approval of the FY 2020/21-2021/22 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
52
APPENDIX B – PLANNING STUDIES IN THE MPO AREA
This list is compiled and/or updated by the Collier MPO staff for the purposes of regional planning. It is included here for reference.
SR 29 (in Collier County) – FDOT is completing a PD&E study that looks at several alternatives to provide more capacity through
Immokalee. An alternative has been endorsed by the MPO Board but the PD&E has not been approved by FHWA. This project has
been going on since 2007. The Collier MPO 2040 Needs Plan and Cost Feasible Plan include this project
Old US 41 (Lee/Collier County)– FDOT is completing a PD&E study to evaluate alternatives for capacity and sidewalk
improvements.
Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study – Immokalee Road between Livingston Road and Logan Blvd. was considered a
congested corridor in the 2019 Annual Update and Inventory Reports (AUIRs). Collier County began the Corridor Congestion Study
to identify existing and future conditions in the corridor, to develop and evaluate options to relieve the congestion, to engage the public
in presenting the study findings and take input, and to develop recommendations to guide decision-makers in advancing future
improvements. The recommendations of the study are expected to include several innovative intersection improvements and design
concepts which will be presented to the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) for approval.
Golden Gate Parkway Complete Streets Study – This study of the Golden Gate Parkway corridor from Santa Barbara Blvd. to
Collier Blvd. (951) is intended to recommend the most appropriate intersections, pedestrian features and safety improvements
in the corridor. The study will look at current traffic, future traffic, land use and the Collier County Complete Streets Policy. It is
anticipated that several recommendations and alternatives will be recommended to the BCC.
Green Boulevard Extension/ North Belle Meade Study – Collier County has not commenced this study, but it is intended to evaluate
the area that extends eastward from CR – 951 to surround the North Belle Meade area from Golden Gate Estates to I-75 and eastward
to Everglades Boulevard. The purpose of this study is to more clearly define the future collector roadway network in this area. Several
east-west and north-south needs-based corridors have been identified that would enhance circulation throughout the area. The study
effort would include determining the feasibility and preferred alignment for the identified corridors or alternatives that may be
developed during the study.
CR951 Congestion Relief Study – Collier County has not commenced this study, but it is intended to identify an alternative travel
route to the existing CR951 corridor due to forecasted high congestion levels by 2040. The study area extends from CR951 to City
Gate North Boulevard to Benfield Road on its eastern limits to US41 at its southern limits. The limits of this study area are subject to
change. The study will consider multiple travel routes, improvements to CR951, a no-build option, and evaluate other alternative
planning strategies to alleviate future congestion on CR951.
Golden Gate Estates Bridges – This study will be completed by Collier County. It will include the re-evaluation of 10 new bridges
in the Golden Gate Estates Area.
4.E.1
Packet Pg. 140 Attachment: FY 2020/21-2021/22 UPWP (12550 : Ratify the Chair’s Approval of the FY 2020/21-2021/22 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
53
APPENDIX C – STATEMENTS AND ASSURANCES
4.E.1
Packet Pg. 141 Attachment: FY 2020/21-2021/22 UPWP (12550 : Ratify the Chair’s Approval of the FY 2020/21-2021/22 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
54
4.E.1
Packet Pg. 142 Attachment: FY 2020/21-2021/22 UPWP (12550 : Ratify the Chair’s Approval of the FY 2020/21-2021/22 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
55
4.E.1
Packet Pg. 143 Attachment: FY 2020/21-2021/22 UPWP (12550 : Ratify the Chair’s Approval of the FY 2020/21-2021/22 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
56
4.E.1
Packet Pg. 144 Attachment: FY 2020/21-2021/22 UPWP (12550 : Ratify the Chair’s Approval of the FY 2020/21-2021/22 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
57
4.E.1
Packet Pg. 145 Attachment: FY 2020/21-2021/22 UPWP (12550 : Ratify the Chair’s Approval of the FY 2020/21-2021/22 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
58
4.E.1
Packet Pg. 146 Attachment: FY 2020/21-2021/22 UPWP (12550 : Ratify the Chair’s Approval of the FY 2020/21-2021/22 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
59
4.E.1
Packet Pg. 147 Attachment: FY 2020/21-2021/22 UPWP (12550 : Ratify the Chair’s Approval of the FY 2020/21-2021/22 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
60
APPENDIX D – RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
4.E.1
Packet Pg. 148 Attachment: FY 2020/21-2021/22 UPWP (12550 : Ratify the Chair’s Approval of the FY 2020/21-2021/22 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
61
Agency Comment Response Page
Rae Anne Burton -
Public
How can a document state that a draft was
presented April 27, 2020 on an email that is
dated April 20,2020?
There is a lot of information, mainly it seems to
be budget, it is very confusing and the
information on what is wrong or how to fix is
not clear.
For example the statement about the
Immokalee Road Corridor between Livingston
Road and Logan Blvd being congested. The
reason it is congested is because of the dense
developments that the county is
permitting. The document states that there is
recommendations to include Innovative
intersections. Just What does that mean - more
stop lights – one at each of the current and new
developments to allow access to an already
congested road?
I realize that things can’t stand still during this
influenza, but to only give information to the
public, via website and emails is not
sufficient. There are many concerned residents
that do not have access to internet. This
document is not clear.
The dates were entered in the draft
document prior to COVID-19 and the
cancellation of committee meetings. The
error has been corrected.
Responded to Ms. Burton that the UPWP is
the MPO’s budget document for a two-year
period. It is intended to give an overview of
the MPO’s tasks and budget. There are
elements that the State requires we include
in the document, including a listing of
planning studies conducted by others within
the MPO area. By including the listing of
projects completed by others, it is not
intended to be an endorsement of the
projects or to supply full project
descriptions. The list is a brief overview for
informational purposes.
The UPWP was not sent out solely as a
response to COVID-19. The document was
received because Ms. Burton requested to
be included on a list for information about
MPO programs and documents. This is one
of the ways we achieve our public
involvement. Ms. Burton was advised that
the MPO would be available to provide
more information about MPO programs and
documents upon request.
8
General
General
TAC – Collier
County
Required activities, the date column is the FY
23/24 UPWP and the target date is May 2024
which is outside this UPWP. Is this a typo?
The target date has been corrected to May
2022.
18
TAC – Collier
County
PSA – Target date is August 22, outside the
UPWP. There is only consultant funding for
one year identified. How will this be
accomplished?
There was an error in the table. The target
date has been revised to reflect December
2021. It is intended that a small amount of
additional funding will be added in the
second year to allow for wrap up activities
when close out funding from the current
grant is allocated.
19
TAC – Collier
County
Ideas for PSA’s – Should coordinate with
traffic and congestion issues. The County and
City are working on roundabouts but driver
error and understanding they are not rotaries is
a common issue
Acknowledged. The MPO intends to wait
for the outcome of the Local Road Safety
Plan to help identify priority areas the PSA
and/or a Safety Campaign would be
beneficial.
19
TAC – Collier
County
Task 2 – Required Activities, none are
designated as using consultant services yet
there is $15,000 in consultant services for both
years. This is a very low amount but what
project are they working on or could they be
used in many of the activities.
This task works in coordination with Long
Range Planning and Special Projects and
Systems Planning. The $15,000 identified
may be used for GIS or modeling services
on an as needed basis.
22
TAC – Collier
County
Task 3 - Typos in Purpose dates and 3rd
activity.
Corrected typos. 25
4.E.1
Packet Pg. 149 Attachment: FY 2020/21-2021/22 UPWP (12550 : Ratify the Chair’s Approval of the FY 2020/21-2021/22 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
62
TAC – Collier
County
Task 3 – FY 20/21 Table does not match table
2. Is total for task $10,000 or $20,000?
Corrected error. Total for task is $10,000 26
TAC – Collier
County
Task 5 – Is the MPO doing pedestrian counts? The MPO is collecting bicycle/pedestrian
count data. Some counters are able to
distinguish between bicyclists and
pedestrians.
31
TAC – Collier
County
Task 6 – Responsible agency should include
consultant services.
The responsible agency has been corrected
to include consultant services.
34
TAC – Collier
County
Task 6 – Transit Study, TBD? Is a place holder
acceptable?
The MPO defers to the transit agency to
determine priority for transit planning tasks.
PTNE has asked that we wait until the TDP
and COA have been completed to identify
the next transit planning study. Since the
TDP will be completed by September 2020,
and we have no expectation of receiving the
FY 20/21 5305(d) allocation prior to that
time there should be sufficient time to
identify the transit study and amend the
UPWP prior to executing the transit grant
agreement.
36
TAC – Collier
County
Task 7 – FY 20/21 Tables do not match Table 2 The totals have been corrected. 39
TAC – Collier
County
Summary Tables – Table 2 PL allocations do
not match task tables. Double check funding
and needs/activity costs.
The allocations have been corrected to
match the totals in the task tables.
45, 46
Agency Comment Type Comment Response Page
FTA Region
IV
General If planning activities are proposed for funding
under the 49 USC 5307 program or any other FTA
program, please ensure they are listed and
programmed in the UPWP.
PTNE has notified the
MPO that they will be
completing a COA with
5307 funding. The COA
is identified in Task 6.
General
FTA Region
IV General If funding is being carried over from the prior-
year UPWP, carryover amounts and activities
should be listed in the document. Please identify
any incomplete
work elements or activities financed with
Federal planning assistance awarded in previous
fiscal years as carryover activities.
Activities have been listed
as continued from
previous fiscal years have
been shown as carryover
activities.
General
FTA Region
IV General If any programmed 5305(d) funds are estimates,
coordination with the State DOT may be
required for UPWP modification or amendment
after review of FTA
apportionments.
Understood. The MPO
will coordinate with the
State DOT to ensure that
accurate amounts are
reflected in the UPWP as
actual funding is updated.
General
FTA Region
IV
General The metropolitan transportation planning
process should provide for the establishment and
use of a performance-based approach, with
related activities noted in the UPWP
accordingly. Please note that in addition to
TAM, there is an upcoming deadline for MPO
Understood. This is noted
in the purpose and
required activities of Task
6.
General
4.E.1
Packet Pg. 150 Attachment: FY 2020/21-2021/22 UPWP (12550 : Ratify the Chair’s Approval of the FY 2020/21-2021/22 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
63
Agency Comment Type Comment Response Page
PTASP target setting that will occur during the
next UPWP cycle.
FHWA Editorial The Cost Analysis Certification was included
twice. Please remove the duplicate Cost Analysis
Certification page for FY2021.
The cost analysis
certification for FY 2021
has been removed.
4 & 5
FHWA Critical Please be sure to include the finalized/signed
version in the Final UPWP.
Understood. The signed
version of the cost
analysis certification will
be included in the final
version.
4
FHWA Enhancement Considering that the Local Road Safety Plan is
still in development, I suggest including
references to FDOT’s SHSP in this section for
consistency purposes. This may further illustrate
how the local and state goals, objectives, and
priorities for the plan are similar and provide the
holistic picture for your stakeholders.
A reference to the SHSP
has been included as
suggested.
7
FHWA Enhancement I suggest including a transition paragraph under
the FDOT District One Planning Activities. For
example, consider how FDOT D1 Planning
Activities support the MPO. This will increase
the readability of the document.
A transition paragraph has
been added to the District
One planning activities
section.
8
FHWA Editorial I suggest including instructions for the public to
access the Executed Agreements. For example,
the Operational Procedures and Bylaws section
instructs the public to request documentation
from the Growth Management Division.
A link to the MPO’s
website has been added to
this section.
15
FHWA Editorial Please be sure to update the MPO Agreement
Date for the Final UPWP.
The MPO Agreement date
has been updated.
15
FHWA Editorial For the Final UPWP, I suggest combing through
the document to make sure the proper appendices
are referenced throughout the UPWP
accordingly. For example, the Certifications and
Assurances refers to Appendix H. However,
Appendix C is referenced on page 55.
The reference to
Appendix H has been
changed to Appendix C.
No other errors were
found.
15
FHWA Editorial For the State/Federal Planning Emphasis Area
Matrix section, the narrative refers to page T-5.
However, the Table of Contents reflects page 49.
I suggest the narrative to reflect the intended
page reference to increase readability.
The narrative has been
corrected to reflect the
correct page number.
15
FHWA Enhancement For the previous work sections under each task, I
suggest using a different format to make these
sections easier to read (i.e. the tabular form used
to convey Required Activities, bullets, numbers,
etc.)
The previous work
sections have been
changed to bullet format.
General
FHWA Critical All Agreements or Certifications, including
Debarment and Suspension, Contracts, Grants,
and Cooperative Agreements, Title VI
agreements and DBE statements should be
signed and dated, and included in the final
document.
Understood. All
agreements and
certifications will be
signed and included in the
final document.
General
FHWA Editorial For the Collier MPO TMA Federal Certification
Review, I suggest changing the
target date to reflect the deadline for the report
to be finalized which is December 2020.
The target date was
changed to December
2020.
19
4.E.1
Packet Pg. 151 Attachment: FY 2020/21-2021/22 UPWP (12550 : Ratify the Chair’s Approval of the FY 2020/21-2021/22 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
64
Agency Comment Type Comment Response Page
FHWA Editorial In the FY2020/21 budget table, I suggest
removing “(Still TBD)” from the PSA or
Safety Campaign under Consultant Services.
Still TBD was removed
from the budget table.
20
FHWA Editorial For the last activity at the bottom of page 23, the
task refers to the SHSP. Considering the MPO
changed it to the Local Road Safety Plan, I
suggest referencing the appropriate plan.
However, if this is referencing the FDOT’s
SHSP, please include it in the activity.
Updated statement to
Local Road Safety Plan.
23
FHWA Critical For the third activity and deliverables,
attendance and participation at meetings and
committees for Long Range planning efforts do
not have feasible outcomes. Please incorporate
benefits and products that support long range
planning efforts and include those under the
deliverables section. Additionally, I suggest
using this approach and applying to the other
activities/deliverables listed in Task 4.
Deliverables have been
modified.
27 & 28
FHWA Critical Please incorporate an activity/task that addresses
incorporating TPM into your LRTP. It should
also include monitoring and adjusting targets
with the
assumption as an ongoing basis.
TPM activity has been
added to the task.
27 & 28
FHWA Critical On page 32 B. Consultant Services, funds are
programmed to the SHSP. However, pages 30-
31 discuss funding and completing the Local
Road Safety Plan. If this is the case, I suggest
editing the FY20/21 budget table accordingly.
The table was updated as
suggested.
30-32
FHWA Enhancement For Task 9, I suggest including a budget table
and reflect the associated funds.
Please refer to what was included for Task 8’s
budget tables.
Task 9 was redundant and
was removed from the
document. The budget for
the state’s match of FTA
5305 funding is shown in
Task 6.
42
FHWA Critical Based on the PL formula for Collier MPO, the
MPO will be receiving $548,485. Per FDOT’s
spreadsheet for FY20 PL funds, Collier MPO had
$0. However, the MPO programmed $629,485
for FY 2020/21. Please provide justification for
including an additional $81,000.
The additional funding is
de-obligation from FY
19/20. The amount has
been modified to reflect
the correct amount.
45
FHWA Editorial Tasks that involve consultant participation (such
as Tasks 1, 4 and 5) should provide enough
detail (such as project scope, work to be
accomplished for each project, anticipated
completion dates, and project costs) about what
the consultant responsibilities are concerning the
activities to be undertaken using federal-aid
funds. If that is not possible at this time, prior to
the MPO’s use of PL funds for these types
planning projects or activities, the District
should forward a copy of the scope of services,
the anticipated cost, and completion date to the
FHWA for review. It will continue to be the
responsibility of the District and MPO to ensure
that all activities undertaken as part of these
tasks
Understood. The scope of
work for projects
identified with consultant
participation is not
available at this time. The
MPO will send all scopes
of work to the District for
review and approval prior
to issuing a purchase
order.
General
4.E.1
Packet Pg. 152 Attachment: FY 2020/21-2021/22 UPWP (12550 : Ratify the Chair’s Approval of the FY 2020/21-2021/22 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
65
Agency Comment Type Comment Response Page
are eligible and are allowable costs.
FHWA Critical Please note that all training/meeting/conference
participation must be reasonable, necessary and
allocable to the transportation planning process.
Please provide additional clarification on the
deliverables associated with all
training/meetings/conferences.
Understood. Additional
clarification has been
added.
General
FHWA Enhancement For annual completion dates, please identify
specific months for as many activities possible.
For example, some of the identified activities
identify a month for completion date while other
tasks state “annually” for anticipated date of
completion. If there are any known months of
completion for the tasks, please identify them in
the completion column.
Specific months have
been added where
possible.
General
FHWA Editorial Some Activities are listed in past tense. For
example: (p.19) Maintain the Public
Participation Plan (PPP) and update as
necessary. Conduct all activities needed to
maintain compliance with plan including
maintained and updated website, legal ads, press
releases, etc.; (p. 23) Continued coordination
with jurisdictions,; (p.25) planning and
congestion management projects that have been
prioritized
by the MPO.;(p.30) Attend and participated in
workshops and seminars sponsored by FHWA,
FDOT and other professional organizations as
appropriate
Activities have been
corrected to present tense.
19,23,25,30
FDOT Editorial The Collier UPWP document is user-friendly
with including an interactive Table of Contents
and flowing dialogue which is concise yet still
captures the required elements of the UPWP.
Additionally, the Required Activities graphs
provide good details in the “Activities” and
“Deliverables” segments for the public to follow
under each Task. Great discussion of the
objective of the Collier MPO with including the
“3 C’s” of the planning process.
The amount of work placed into this UPWP is
evident as Ms. Otero challenged herself to
significantly par down this edition of the
Collier’s UPWP while still being a very
comprehensive document and meeting the State
and Federal Agency requirements. I enjoyed
reviewing it.
Thank you for your
positive comments.
General
FDOT Recommendation The bottom of page 2 lists a PEA Matrix –
should (is) PEA (Planning Emphasis Areas)
spelled out for the public – maybe I missed this
Planning Emphasis Areas
has been spelled out.
2
FDOT Recommendation Include FDOT Planning Activity of “Complete
Streets Studies”.
“Complete Streets
Studies” has been added.
8 & 9
FDOT Recommendation Under Executed Agreements, is the highlighted
date of 7/1/18 a placeholder? Should it reflect a
more current date?
7/1/18 was a placeholder.
It has been revised to
reflect the current date.
15
4.E.1
Packet Pg. 153 Attachment: FY 2020/21-2021/22 UPWP (12550 : Ratify the Chair’s Approval of the FY 2020/21-2021/22 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
66
Agency Comment Type Comment Response Page
FDOT Recommendation There is a “PSA or Safety Campaign (TBD)” on
Task 1 Financial Tables listed for $100,000 in
FY2020/21. I would suggest also including this
in FY 2021/22 in case this is not completed in
the first year of the UPWP – perhaps allocate
$70,000 to the first year and $30,000 to
complete it in the second year (?).
Funding will be added
when closeout funding is
available from FY 19/20.
There is currently not
sufficient funding to
allocate funding to this
study in year two.
20
FDOT Recommendation In Task 5, is the Strategic Highway Safety Plan
supposed to be called “Local Road Safety Plan”
(?)
Strategic Highway Safety
Plan has been revised to
Local Road Safety Plan.
32
FDOT Recommendation In Task 6 of the Transit Financial Tables; section
B. Consultant Services, FY21 includes activities
for the completion of the LRTP, TDP Major
Update and other consultant services, resulting
in significantly more funding in FY21 than in
FY22 for this Task. In FY22 is it anticipated
only one Transit Study will occur with $54,
8333 allocated? Is it possible more funding may
be needed to be allocated to consultant services
for Transit in FY22?? (Also given the emphasis
for more multi modal services)
Carryforward funding and
activities are included in
the tables for the first
fiscal year which makes it
appear that there is more
funding in FY 20/21. FY
21/22 only includes the
allocation for one fiscal
year.
FDOT Recommendation The page numbering jumps from page 44 to 46
with what appears to be a blank page in-
between… or maybe that is just my printer….
The pagination issue has
been corrected.
44-46
FDOT Recommendation Page 49 has a sentence that wraps around the
table – is there any way to include that sentence
all on top of the table for ease of reading? Just a
suggestion.
The error was corrected. 49
FDOT Recommendation Several of the End Products are targeted for
Year 1 of the UPWP, yet less funding is planned
than Year 2. Please review to ensure this is
accurate.
The end products and
funding are accurate.
Additional funding will be
added to year two with the
close out balance from the
current grant.
General
FDOT
Recommendation All Agreements or Certifications, including the
UPWP Title Page, Debarment and Suspension,
Contracts, Grants, and Cooperative Agreements,
Title VI agreements and DBE statements should
be signed and dated, and included in the final
document.
Understood. Signed
agreements and
certifications will be
included in the final
document.
General
4.E.1
Packet Pg. 154 Attachment: FY 2020/21-2021/22 UPWP (12550 : Ratify the Chair’s Approval of the FY 2020/21-2021/22 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
Financial Project No.:
439314-3-14-01 & 439314-3-14-02
(item-segment-phase-sequence)
Contract No.: G1M49
Fund: PL and
SU
Function:
215
Federal Award Identification No.
(FAIN): PL0313
(058)
MPO DUNS No.:
023564583
FLAIR Approp.:
088854
FLAIR Obj.:
780000
Org. Code:
55012010130
Vendor No.:
F596000558057
CFDA Number & Title: 20.205 Highway Planning and
Construction
DocuSign Envelope ID: D69C2C72-94EF-41D7-A874-269896E98B49
DocuSign Envelope ID: A147FC6A-7642-4944-9A94-D64C83A5DBCO
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION AGREEMENT
525-010-02
POLICY PLANNING
OGC — 1/18 Page
1 of 14
THIS METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION AGREEMENT (Agreement) is made and entered into on this
21 day of May, 2020, by and between the STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
(Department), an agency of the State of Florida, whose address is Office of the District Secretary, 801 North Broadway
Avenue, Bartow FL 33831 and the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO), whose address is 2885 S Horseshoe
Dr, Naples, FL 34104, and whose Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) Number is: 023564583 (collectively the
"parties").
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants, promises, and representation herein, the parties
desiring to be legally bound, do agree as follows:
1. Authority: The MPO and the Department have authority to enter into this Agreement pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 134, 23
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR or C.F.R.) §450 and Section 339.175, Florida Statutes (F.S.), which, require the
Department and the MPO to enter into an agreement clearly identifying the responsibilities for cooperatively carrying
out the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) portion of the Metropolitan Planning Process and accomplishing the
transportation planning requirements of state and federal law.
2. Purpose of the Agreement: The purpose of this Agreement is to pass through financial assistance through the
Department in the form of FHWA funds to the MPO for the completion of transportation related planning activities set
forth in the Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) of the MPO (Project), state the terms and conditions upon
which FHWA funds will be provided, and set forth the manner in which work tasks and subtasks within the UPWP
will be undertaken and completed. The Project is more fully described in the UPWP, which is attached and
incorporated into this Agreement as Exhibit "A".
3. Scope of Work: The UPWP, Exhibit "A", constitutes the Scope of Work for this Agreement.
4. Project Cost: The total budgetary ceiling for the Project is $1,365,558. The budget, including tasks, is summarized
below and detailed in the UPWP, Exhibit "A". The budget may be modified by mutual agreement as provided for in
paragraph 7, Amendments.
The Department's performance and obligation to pay under this Agreement is contingent upon an annual
appropriation by the Legislature. No work shall begin before the Agreement is fully executed and a "Letter of
Authorization" is issued by the Department. The total of all authorizations shall not exceed the budgetary ceiling
established for this agreement and shall be completed within the term of this Agreement:
FINANCIAL PROJECT NO. AMOUNT
439314-3-14-01 PL $1,180,558.00
439314-3-14-04 SU $185,000.00
5. Term of Agreement: This Agreement shall have a term of two (2) years. This Agreement shall begin on the later of
July 1, 2020 or the date the Agreement is fully executed, whichever is later and expire on June 30, 2022. If the
Agreement is fully executed after July 1, 2020, then the term of the Agreement shall be less than two (2) years and
the Agreement shall expire on June 30, 2022. Expiration of this Agreement will be considered termination of the
4.E.2
Packet Pg. 155 Attachment: MPO Agreement for PL funding (12550 : Ratify the Chair’s Approval of the FY 2020/21-2021/22 Unified Planning Work Program
DocuSign Envelope ID: D69C2C72-94EF-41D7-A874-269896E98B49
4.E.2
Packet Pg. 156 Attachment: MPO Agreement for PL funding (12550 : Ratify the Chair’s Approval of the FY 2020/21-2021/22 Unified Planning Work Program
DocuSign Envelope ID: D69C2C72-94EF-41D7-A874-269896E98B49
4.E.2
Packet Pg. 157 Attachment: MPO Agreement for PL funding (12550 : Ratify the Chair’s Approval of the FY 2020/21-2021/22 Unified Planning Work Program
DocuSign Envelope ID: D69C2C72-94EF-41D7-A874-269896E98B49
4.E.2
Packet Pg. 158 Attachment: MPO Agreement for PL funding (12550 : Ratify the Chair’s Approval of the FY 2020/21-2021/22 Unified Planning Work Program
DocuSign Envelope ID: D69C2C72-94EF-41D7-A874-269896E98B49
4.E.2
Packet Pg. 159 Attachment: MPO Agreement for PL funding (12550 : Ratify the Chair’s Approval of the FY 2020/21-2021/22 Unified Planning Work Program
DocuSign Envelope ID: D69C2C72-94EF-41D7-A874-269896E98B49
4.E.2
Packet Pg. 160 Attachment: MPO Agreement for PL funding (12550 : Ratify the Chair’s Approval of the FY 2020/21-2021/22 Unified Planning Work Program
DocuSign Envelope ID: D69C2C72-94EF-41D7-A874-269896E98B49
4.E.2
Packet Pg. 161 Attachment: MPO Agreement for PL funding (12550 : Ratify the Chair’s Approval of the FY 2020/21-2021/22 Unified Planning Work Program
DocuSign Envelope ID: D69C2C72-94EF-41D7-A874-269896E98B49
4.E.2
Packet Pg. 162 Attachment: MPO Agreement for PL funding (12550 : Ratify the Chair’s Approval of the FY 2020/21-2021/22 Unified Planning Work Program
DocuSign Envelope ID: D69C2C72-94EF-41D7-A874-269896E98B49
4.E.2
Packet Pg. 163 Attachment: MPO Agreement for PL funding (12550 : Ratify the Chair’s Approval of the FY 2020/21-2021/22 Unified Planning Work Program
DocuSign Envelope ID: D69C2C72-94EF-41D7-A874-269896E98B49
4.E.2
Packet Pg. 164 Attachment: MPO Agreement for PL funding (12550 : Ratify the Chair’s Approval of the FY 2020/21-2021/22 Unified Planning Work Program
District Secretary
L.K. Nandam, P.E.
DocuSign Envelope ID: D69C2C72-94EF-41D7-A874-269896E98B49
4.E.2
Packet Pg. 165 Attachment: MPO Agreement for PL funding (12550 : Ratify the Chair’s Approval of the FY 2020/21-2021/22 Unified Planning Work Program
DocuSign Envelope ID: D69C2C72-94EF-41D7-A874-269896E98B49
4.E.2
Packet Pg. 166 Attachment: MPO Agreement for PL funding (12550 : Ratify the Chair’s Approval of the FY 2020/21-2021/22 Unified Planning Work Program
DocuSign Envelope ID: D69C2C72-94EF-41D7-A874-269896E98B49
4.E.2
Packet Pg. 167 Attachment: MPO Agreement for PL funding (12550 : Ratify the Chair’s Approval of the FY 2020/21-2021/22 Unified Planning Work Program
DocuSign Envelope ID: D69C2C72-94EF-41D7-A874-269896E98B49
4.E.2
Packet Pg. 168 Attachment: MPO Agreement for PL funding (12550 : Ratify the Chair’s Approval of the FY 2020/21-2021/22 Unified Planning Work Program
4.E.3
Packet Pg. 169 Attachment: Resolution 2020-04 (12550 : Ratify the Chair’s Approval of the FY 2020/21-2021/22 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) and
06/12/2020
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Ratify Chair’s Approval of 2019 FDOT-MPO Joint Certification Statement
OBJECTIVE: For the MPO Board to ratify the Chair’s approval of the 2019 FDOT-MPO Joint
Certification Statement.
CONSIDERATIONS: The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) conducts an annual review of
the metropolitan transportation planning process for the Collier MPO with respect to Federal
requirements. Each year, MPO staff and FDOT staff meet to discuss the annual review and jointly
compile the required documentation. This year’s review is based on calendar year 2019. (Attachment 1)
Highlights from this year’s Joint Certification Review include:
• FDOT’s Risk Assessment Point Total is 0; the MPO’s Level of Risk is Low (see Part 1 page 13)
• Noteworthy Practices & Achievements (see Part 2 page 12) include the adoption of the Golden
Gate Walkable Community Study, Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan and a major revision of
the Public Participation Plan; reporting on Transportation Performance measures and Targ ets in
the Annual Report, and expanded public outreach using social media.
Based on the joint review and evaluation and contingent upon MPO Board approval, FDOT and the
Collier MPO Chair sign the MPO Joint Certification Statement, which recommends that the Metropolitan
Planning Process for the Collier MPO be certified for another year. (Attachment 2) The certification
package and statement must be submitted to FDOT’s Central Office by no later than June 1. The MPO
Board delegated authority to the MPO Chair to sign time-sensitive documents during the COVID-19
pandemic. The MPO Chair approved and signed the Joint Certification Statement on May 8, 2020.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: n/a.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the MPO Board ratify the Chair’s approval of the 2019 FDOT-
MPO Joint Certification Statement.
Prepared by: Anne McLaughlin, MPO Director
ATTACHMENT(S)
1. 2019 Joint Certification Review Documentation (PDF)
2. FDOT-MPO Joint Certification Statement 2019 (PDF)
4.F
Packet Pg. 170
06/12/2020
COLLIER COUNTY
Metropolitan Planning Organization
Item Number: 4.F
Doc ID: 12551
Item Summary: Ratify Chair’s Approval of 2019 FDOT-MPO Joint Certification Statement
Meeting Date: 06/12/2020
Prepared by:
Title: – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Karen Intriago
06/03/2020 10:57 AM
Submitted by:
Title: Executive Director - MPO – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Anne McLaughlin
06/03/2020 10:57 AM
Approved By:
Review:
Metropolitan Planning Organization Brandy Otero MPO Analyst Review Completed 06/03/2020 11:04 AM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin MPO Executive Director Review Completed 06/03/2020 12:26 PM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin Meeting Pending 06/12/2020 9:00 AM
4.F
Packet Pg. 171
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MPO JOINT CERTIFICATION
525-010-05
POLICY PLANNING
10/19
FINAL
Collier MPO
Joint Certification – 2019
May 2020
Part 1 – FDOT District
4.F.1
Packet Pg. 172 Attachment: 2019 Joint Certification Review Documentation (12551 : Ratify Chair’s Approval of 2019 FDOT-MPO Joint Certification Statement)
FDOT Joint Certification
Part 1 – FDOT District
525-010-05
POLICY PLANNING
10/19
Office of Policy Planning
Contents
Purpose ............................................................................................................................... 2
Certification Process ......................................................................................................... 3
Risk Assessment Process ........................................................................................ 4
Part 1 Section 1: Risk Assessment .......................................................................... 8
Part 1 Section 2: Long-Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) .................................. 14
Part 1 Section 3: Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) ............................. 15
Part 1 Section 4: Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) ................................... 16
Part 1 Section 5: Clean Air Act ................................................................................ 17
Part 1 Section 6: Technical Memorandum 19-03: Documentation of FHWA PL
and Non-PL Funding ................................................................................................. 18
Part 1 Section 7: District Questions ....................................................................... 19
Part 1 Section 8: Recommendations and Corrective Actions ............................. 20
Part 1 Section 9: Attachments ................................................................................ 21
4.F.1
Packet Pg. 173 Attachment: 2019 Joint Certification Review Documentation (12551 : Ratify Chair’s Approval of 2019 FDOT-MPO Joint Certification Statement)
FDOT Joint Certification
Part 1 – FDOT District
525-010-05
POLICY PLANNING
10/19
2
Office of Policy Planning
Purpose
Each year, the District and the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) must jointly
certify the metropolitan transportation planning process as described in 23 C.F.R.
§450.336. The joint certification begins in January. This allows time to incorporate
recommended changes into the Draft Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP). The District
and the MPO create a joint certification package that includes a summary of noteworthy
achievements by the MPO and, if applicable, a list of any recommendations and/or
corrective actions.
The Certification Package and statement must be submitted to Central Office, Office of
Policy Planning (OPP) no later than June 1.
4.F.1
Packet Pg. 174 Attachment: 2019 Joint Certification Review Documentation (12551 : Ratify Chair’s Approval of 2019 FDOT-MPO Joint Certification Statement)
FDOT Joint Certification
Part 1 – FDOT District
525-010-05
POLICY PLANNING
10/19
3
Office of Policy Planning
Certification Process
Please read and answer each question within this document.
Since all of Florida’s MPOs adopt a new Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)
annually, many of the questions related to the TIP adoption process have been removed
from this certification, as these questions have been addressed during review of the draft
TIP and after adoption of the final TIP.
As with the TIP, many of the questions related to the Unified Planning Work Program
(UPWP) and Long-Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) have been removed from this
certification document, as these questions are included in the process of reviewing and
adopting the UPWP and LRTP.
Note: This certification has been designed as an entirely electronic document and includes
interactive form fields. Part 1 Section 9: Attachments allows you to embed any attachments
to the certification, including the MPO Joint Certification Statements and Assurances
document that must accompany the completed certification report. Once all the appropriate
parties sign the Statements and Assurances, scan it and attach it to the completed
certification in Part 1 Section 9: Attachments.
Please note that the District shall report the identification of and provide status updates of
any corrective action or other issues identified during certification directly to the MPO
Board. Once the MPO has resolved the corrective action or issue to the satisfaction of the
District, the District shall report the resolution of the corrective action or issue to the MPO
Board.
The final Certification Package should include Part 1, Part 2, and any required attachments
and be transmitted to Central Office no later than June 1 of each year.
4.F.1
Packet Pg. 175 Attachment: 2019 Joint Certification Review Documentation (12551 : Ratify Chair’s Approval of 2019 FDOT-MPO Joint Certification Statement)
FDOT Joint Certification
Part 1 – FDOT District
525-010-05
POLICY PLANNING
10/19
4
Office of Policy Planning
Risk Assessment Process
Part 1 Section 1: Risk Assessment evaluates the requirements described in 2 CFR
§200.331 (b)-(e), also expressed below. It is important to note that FDOT is the recipient
and the MPOs are the subrecipient, meaning that FDOT, as the recipient of Federal-aid
funds for the State, is responsible for ensuring that Federal-aid funds are expended in
accordance with applicable laws and regulations.
(b) Evaluate each subrecipient's risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations,
and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate
subrecipient monitoring described in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, which may
include consideration of such factors as:
(1) The subrecipient’s prior experience with the same or similar subawards;
(2) The results of previous audits including whether the subrecipient receives a
Single Audit in accordance with Subpart F—Audit Requirements of this part, and the
extent to which the same or similar subaward has been audited as a major program;
(3) Whether the subrecipient has new personnel or new or substantially changed
systems; and
(4) The extent and results of Federal awarding agency monitoring (e.g., if the
subrecipient also receives Federal awards directly from a Federal awarding agency).
(c) Consider imposing specific subaward conditions upon a subrecipient if appropriate as
described in §200.207 Specific conditions.
(d) Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is
used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the
terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved.
Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include:
(1) Reviewing financial and performance reports required by the pass-through entity.
(2) Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate
action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient
from the pass-through entity detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other
means.
4.F.1
Packet Pg. 176 Attachment: 2019 Joint Certification Review Documentation (12551 : Ratify Chair’s Approval of 2019 FDOT-MPO Joint Certification Statement)
FDOT Joint Certification
Part 1 – FDOT District
525-010-05
POLICY PLANNING
10/19
5
Office of Policy Planning
(3) Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the Federal award
provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity as required by §200.521
Management decision.
(e) Depending upon the pass-through entity's assessment of risk posed by the subrecipient
(as described in paragraph (b) of this section), the following monitoring tools may be useful
for the pass-through entity to ensure proper accountability and compliance with program
requirements and achievement of performance goals:
(1) Providing subrecipients with training and technical assistance on program-
related matters; and
(2) Performing on-site reviews of the subrecipient’s program operations;
(3) Arranging for agreed-upon-procedures engagements as described in §200.425
Audit services.
After coordination with the Office of Policy Planning, any of the considerations in 2 CFR
§200.331 (b) may result in an MPO being assigned the High-risk level.
The questions in Part 1 Section 1: Risk Assessment are quantified and scored to assign a
level of risk for each MPO, which will be updated annually during the joint certification
process. The results of the Risk Assessment determine the minimum frequency by which
the MPO’s supporting documentation for their invoices is reviewed by FDOT MPO Liaisons
for the upcoming year. The frequency of review is based on the level of risk in Table 1.
Table 1. Risk Assessment Scoring
Score Risk Level Frequency of Monitoring
> 85 percent Low Annual
68 to < 84 percent Moderate Bi-annual
52 to < 68 percent Elevated Tri-annual
< 52 percent High Quarterly
4.F.1
Packet Pg. 177 Attachment: 2019 Joint Certification Review Documentation (12551 : Ratify Chair’s Approval of 2019 FDOT-MPO Joint Certification Statement)
FDOT Joint Certification
Part 1 – FDOT District
525-010-05
POLICY PLANNING
10/19
6
Office of Policy Planning
The Risk Assessment that is part of this joint certification has two main components – the
Certification phase and the Monitoring phase – and involves regular reviewing, checking,
and surveillance. The first step is to complete this Risk Assessment during the joint
certification for the current year (The red line in Figure 1). The current year runs for a 12-
month period from January 1 to December 31 of the same year (Example: January 1,
2018 through December 31, 2018). There is a 6-month period when the joint certification
for the current year is reviewed before the Risk Assessment enters the Monitoring phase.
The joint certification review runs from January 1 to June 30 (Example: January 1, 2019
through June 30, 2019). After the review has been completed, the Risk Assessment
enters the Monitoring phase, where the MPO is monitored for a 12-month period (Example:
July 1, 2019 to June 30, 2020). The entire Risk Assessment runs for a total of 30-months.
However, there will always be an overlapping of previous year, current year, and future
year Risk Assessments. Figure 1 shows the timeline of Risk Assessment phases and how
Risk Assessments can overlap from year to year.
Figure 1. Risk Assessment: Certification Year vs. Monitoring
4.F.1
Packet Pg. 178 Attachment: 2019 Joint Certification Review Documentation (12551 : Ratify Chair’s Approval of 2019 FDOT-MPO Joint Certification Statement)
FDOT Joint Certification
Part 1 – FDOT District
525-010-05
POLICY PLANNING
10/19
7
Office of Policy Planning
Part 1
Part 1 of the Joint Certification is to be completed by the FDOT MPO Liaison.
4.F.1
Packet Pg. 179 Attachment: 2019 Joint Certification Review Documentation (12551 : Ratify Chair’s Approval of 2019 FDOT-MPO Joint Certification Statement)
FDOT Joint Certification
Part 1 – FDOT District
525-010-05
POLICY PLANNING
10/19
8
Office of Policy Planning
Part 1 Section 1: Risk Assessment
MPO Invoice Submittal
List all invoices and the dates that the invoices were submitted for reimbursement during
the certification period in Table 2 below.
Table 2. MPO Invoice Submittal Summary
** Please Note: The following Invoices listed below are within Collier’s Cert Period of
01/2019 – 12/31/19. Collier submits their Invoices Quarterly.
Invoice # Invoice Period
Date the Invoice was
Forwarded to FDOT for
Payment
Was the Invoice
Submitted More than 90
days After the End of the
Invoice Period? (Yes or
No)
FHWA-
G0Y70-
3
01/1/2019 –
3/31/19 5/2/19 NO
FHWA-
G0Y70-
4
4/01/19 –
06/30/19 8/20/19 NO
FHWA-
G0Y70-
5
07/01/19 -
9/30/19 10/24/19 NO
FHWA-
G0Y70-
6
10/01/19-
12/31/19 01/28/19 NO
MPO Invoice Submittal Total: 4 (Submitted Quarterly)
Total Number of Invoices that were Submitted on Time 4
Total Number of Invoices Submitted 4
4.F.1
Packet Pg. 180 Attachment: 2019 Joint Certification Review Documentation (12551 : Ratify Chair’s Approval of 2019 FDOT-MPO Joint Certification Statement)
FDOT Joint Certification
Part 1 – FDOT District
525-010-05
POLICY PLANNING
10/19
9
Office of Policy Planning
MPO Invoice Review Checklist
List all MPO Invoice Review Checklists that were completed in the certification period in
Table 3 and attach the checklists to this risk assessment. Identify the total number of
materially significant finding questions that were correct on each MPO Invoice Review
Checklist (i.e. checked yes). The MPO Invoice Review Checklist identifies questions that
are considered materially significant with a red asterisk. Examples of materially significant
findings include:
• Submitting unallowable, unreasonable or unnecessary expenses or corrections
that affect the total amounts for paying out.
• Exceeding allocation or task budget.
• Submitting an invoice that is not reflected in the UPWP.
• Submitting an invoice that is out of the project scope.
• Submitting an invoice that is outside of the agreement period.
• Documenting budget status incorrectly.
Corrections or findings that are not considered materially significant do not warrant
elevation of MPO risk. Examples of corrections or findings that are not considered
materially significant include:
• Typos.
• Incorrect budgeted amount because an amendment was not recorded.
• Incorrect invoice number.
4.F.1
Packet Pg. 181 Attachment: 2019 Joint Certification Review Documentation (12551 : Ratify Chair’s Approval of 2019 FDOT-MPO Joint Certification Statement)
FDOT Joint Certification
Part 1 – FDOT District
525-010-05
POLICY PLANNING
10/19
10
Office of Policy Planning
Table 3. MPO Invoice Review Checklist Summary
MPO Invoice Review Checklist
Number of Correct
Materially Significant
Finding Questions
FHWA-G0Y70-3 01/1/2019 – 3/31/19
FHWA-G0Y70-4 4/01/19 – 06/30/19
FHWA-G0Y70-5 07/01/19 -9/30/19
FHWA-G0Y70-6 10/01/19-12/31/19
7
7
7
7
4.F.1
Packet Pg. 182 Attachment: 2019 Joint Certification Review Documentation (12551 : Ratify Chair’s Approval of 2019 FDOT-MPO Joint Certification Statement)
FDOT Joint Certification
Part 1 – FDOT District
525-010-05
POLICY PLANNING
10/19
11
Office of Policy Planning
MPO Invoice Review Checklist Total 28 Total Available Points to Achieve (4 Invoices
during this certification review period-quarterly invoiced)
Total Number of Materially Significant Finding Questions that
were Correct 28 Total = 100%
*Note: There are 7 materially significant questions per MPO Invoice Review Checklist.
MPO Supporting Documentation Review Checklist
List all MPO Supporting Documentation Review Checklists that were completed in the
certification period in Table 4 and attach the checklists and supporting documentation to
this risk assessment. Identify the total number of materially significant finding questions
that were correct on each MPO Supporting Documentation Review Checklist (i.e.
checked yes). The MPO Supporting Documentation Review Checklist identifies questions
that are considered materially significant with a red asterisk. Examples of materially
significant findings include:
• Submitting an invoice with charges that are not on the Itemized Expenditure
Detail Report.
• Submitting an invoice with an expense that is not allowable.
• Failing to submit supporting documentation, such as documentation that shows
the invoice was paid.
• Submitting travel charges that do not comply with the MPO’s travel policy.
Table 4. MPO Supporting Documentation Review Checklist Summary
MPO Supporting Documentation Review Checklist
Number of Correct
Materially Significant
Finding Questions
Attached also –Collier MPO was a “Low” Risk so we only
had 1 Doc Review in 2019
(23 out of 24
Allowable)
4.F.1
Packet Pg. 183 Attachment: 2019 Joint Certification Review Documentation (12551 : Ratify Chair’s Approval of 2019 FDOT-MPO Joint Certification Statement)
FDOT Joint Certification
Part 1 – FDOT District
525-010-05
POLICY PLANNING
10/19
12
Office of Policy Planning
MPO Supporting Documentation Review Checklist Total 24
Total Number of Materially Significant Finding Questions that
were Correct 23
*Note: There are 24 materially significant questions per MPO Supporting Documentation Review Checklist.
Technical Memorandum 19-02: Car Allowance or Mileage Reimbursements
Was car allowance or mileage recorded appropriately based on the number of business-
related miles an employee drives and the cost associated with operating a personal
vehicle?
Please Check: Yes No
Technical Memorandum 19-04: Incurred Cost and Invoicing Practices
Were incurred costs billed appropriately at the end of the contract period?
Please Check: Yes No
Technical Memorandum 19-05Rev: Director’s Timesheets and Expenses
Were the Director’s timesheets and expenses reviewed at least quarterly by the MPO
Board, Executive Committee, Board Chair, or Board Treasurer?
Please Check: Yes No
Risk Assessment Score
Please use the Risk Assessment worksheet to calculate the MPO’s risk score. Use
Table 5 as a guide for the selecting the MPO’s risk level.
Table 5. Risk Assessment Scoring
Score Risk Level Frequency of Monitoring
> 85 percent Low Annual
68 to < 84 percent Moderate Bi-annual
52 to < 68 percent Elevated Tri-annual
< 52 percent High Quarterly
4.F.1
Packet Pg. 184 Attachment: 2019 Joint Certification Review Documentation (12551 : Ratify Chair’s Approval of 2019 FDOT-MPO Joint Certification Statement)
FDOT Joint Certification
Part 1 – FDOT District
525-010-05
POLICY PLANNING
10/19
13
Office of Policy Planning
Risk Assessment Percentage: >85 percent
Level of Risk: Low
4.F.1
Packet Pg. 185 Attachment: 2019 Joint Certification Review Documentation (12551 : Ratify Chair’s Approval of 2019 FDOT-MPO Joint Certification Statement)
FDOT Joint Certification
Part 1 – FDOT District
525-010-05
POLICY PLANNING
10/19
14
Office of Policy Planning
Part 1 Section 2: Long-Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)
1. Did the MPO adopt a new LRTP in the year that this certification is addressing?
Please Check: Yes No
If yes, please ensure any correspondence or comments related to the draft or final
LRTP and the LRTP checklist used by Central Office and the District are in the MPO
Document Portal or attach it to Part 1 Section 9: Attachments. List the titles and dates
of attachments uploaded to the MPO Document Portal below.
Title(s) and Date(s) of Attachment(s) in the MPO Document Portal
N/A
4.F.1
Packet Pg. 186 Attachment: 2019 Joint Certification Review Documentation (12551 : Ratify Chair’s Approval of 2019 FDOT-MPO Joint Certification Statement)
FDOT Joint Certification
Part 1 – FDOT District
525-010-05
POLICY PLANNING
10/19
15
Office of Policy Planning
Part 1 Section 3: Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)
1. Did the MPO update their TIP in the year that this certification is addressing?
Please Check: Yes No
If yes, please ensure any correspondence or comments related to the draft or final TIP
and the TIP checklist used by Central Office and the District are in the MPO Document
Portal or attach it to Part 1 Section 9: Attachments. List the titles and dates of
attachments uploaded to the MPO Document Portal below.
Title(s) and Date(s) of Attachment(s) in the MPO Document Portal
Please see Section 9 for all Attachments.
4.F.1
Packet Pg. 187 Attachment: 2019 Joint Certification Review Documentation (12551 : Ratify Chair’s Approval of 2019 FDOT-MPO Joint Certification Statement)
FDOT Joint Certification
Part 1 – FDOT District
525-010-05
POLICY PLANNING
10/19
16 Office of Policy Planning
Part 1 Section 4: Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
1.Did the MPO adopt a new UPWP in the year that this certification is addressing?
Please Check: Yes No
If yes, please ensure any correspondence or comments related to the draft or final
UPWP and the UPWP checklist used by Central Office and the District are in the MPO
Document Portal or attach it to Part 1 Section 9: Attachments. List the titles and dates
of attachments uploaded to the MPO Document Portal below.
Title(s) and Date(s) of Attachment(s) in the MPO Document Portal
FYI: The MPO adopted a new UPWP in FY18 and will adopt another new
UPWP in FY20; they did not adopt a new UPWP in 2019; the year of this
Certification.
4.F.1
Packet Pg. 188 Attachment: 2019 Joint Certification Review Documentation (12551 : Ratify Chair’s Approval of 2019 FDOT-MPO Joint Certification Statement)
FDOT Joint Certification
Part 1 – FDOT District
525-010-05
POLICY PLANNING
10/19
17
Office of Policy Planning
Part 1 Section 5: Clean Air Act
The requirements of Sections 174 and 176 (c) and (d) of the Clean Air Act.
The Clean Air Act requirements affecting transportation only applies to areas designated
nonattainment and maintenance for the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS).
Florida currently is attaining all NAAQS. No certification questions are required at this time.
In the event the Environmental Protection Agency issues revised NAAQS, this section may
require revision.
Title(s) of Attachment(s)
N/A – as Stated Above - No certification questions are required at this time.
4.F.1
Packet Pg. 189 Attachment: 2019 Joint Certification Review Documentation (12551 : Ratify Chair’s Approval of 2019 FDOT-MPO Joint Certification Statement)
FDOT Joint Certification
Part 1 – FDOT District
525-010-05
POLICY PLANNING
10/19
18
Office of Policy Planning
Part 1 Section 6: Technical Memorandum 19-03: Documentation
of FHWA PL and Non-PL Funding
Did the MPO program all FHWA Planning Funds (PL and non-PL) into the TIP?
Please Check: Yes No
Additional PL and Non-Pl projects and planning studies are listed in the Appendixes of the
TIP
4.F.1
Packet Pg. 190 Attachment: 2019 Joint Certification Review Documentation (12551 : Ratify Chair’s Approval of 2019 FDOT-MPO Joint Certification Statement)
FDOT Joint Certification
Part 1 – FDOT District
525-010-05
POLICY PLANNING
10/19
19
Office of Policy Planning
Part 1 Section 7: District Questions
The District may ask up to five questions at their own discretion based on experience
interacting with the MPO that were not included in the sections above. Please fill in the
question, and the response in the blanks below. This section is optional and may cover any
topic area of which the District would like more information.
1. Question
N/A
2. Question
N/A
3. Question
N/A
4. Question
N/A
5. Question
N/A
4.F.1
Packet Pg. 191 Attachment: 2019 Joint Certification Review Documentation (12551 : Ratify Chair’s Approval of 2019 FDOT-MPO Joint Certification Statement)
FDOT Joint Certification
Part 1 – FDOT District
525-010-05
POLICY PLANNING
10/19
20
Office of Policy Planning
Part 1 Section 8: Recommendations and Corrective Actions
Please note that the District shall report the identification of and provide status updates of
any corrective action or other issues identified during certification directly to the MPO
Board. Once the MPO has resolved the corrective action or issue to the satisfaction of the
District, the District shall report the resolution of the corrective action or issue to the MPO
Board.
Status of Recommendations and/or Corrective Actions from Prior Certifications
The 2017 Collier Joint Certification successfully addressed the Corrective Action for the Congestion
Management Process (CMP) as noted in their September 2016 Federal and State Joint Certification.
FHWA’s final approval letter showing complete resolution of the corrective action is attached in Section
9 of this document as well as being included as a separate attachment.
Recommendations
None
Corrective Actions
None
4.F.1
Packet Pg. 192 Attachment: 2019 Joint Certification Review Documentation (12551 : Ratify Chair’s Approval of 2019 FDOT-MPO Joint Certification Statement)
FDOT Joint Certification
Part 1 – FDOT District
525-010-05
POLICY PLANNING
10/19
21
Office of Policy Planning
Part 1 Section 9: Attachments
Please attach any documents required from the sections above or other certification
related documents here or through the MPO Document Portal. Link to MPO Joint
Certification Statements and Assurances (year 1) or MPO Joint Certification Statement
(year 2).
Title(s) and Date(s) of Attachment(s) in the MPO Document Portal
1. Collier TIP Review Checklist 5_2019 2019 (double left click on “Checklist 5_2019”
in below text box & it takes you directly to the TIP Checklist)
2. TIP Correspondence- double left click on “Cert Doc” below
3. 07202017 Collier CMP Correction Action Approval Letter – double left click “CMP
Corrective.” below
1.
Collier TIP Review
Checklist 5_2019.docx
2.
Appendix A Joint
Cert.doc
3.
07202017 - Collier
CMP Corrective Action Approval Letter.pdf
Appendix A.doc
Appendix A.doc Appendix A.doc Appendix A.doc Appendix A.doc Appendix A.doc Appendix A.doc
Appendix A.doc
4.F.1
Packet Pg. 193 Attachment: 2019 Joint Certification Review Documentation (12551 : Ratify Chair’s Approval of 2019 FDOT-MPO Joint Certification Statement)
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MPO JOINT CERTIFICATION
Part 2 – MPO
525-010-05b
POLICY PLANNING
11/17
Collier MPO
Joint Certification – 2019
April 2020
Part 2 - MPO
FINAL
4.F.1
Packet Pg. 194 Attachment: 2019 Joint Certification Review Documentation (12551 : Ratify Chair’s Approval of 2019 FDOT-MPO Joint Certification Statement)
FDOT Joint Certification
Part 2 – MPO
525-010-05b
POLICY PLANNING
11/17
Office of Policy Planning
Contents
Purpose ......................................................................................................................... 1
Certification Process ..................................................................................................... 2
Part 2 Section 1: MPO Overview .................................................................................. 4
Part 2 Section 2: Finances and Invoicing ..................................................................... 7
Part 2 Section 3: Title VI and ADA ................................................................................ 9
Part 2 Section 4: Disadvantaged Business Enterprises ............................................. 11
Part 2 Section 5: Noteworthy Practices & Achievements ........................................... 12
Part 2 Section 6: MPO Comments .............................................................................. 13
4.F.1
Packet Pg. 195 Attachment: 2019 Joint Certification Review Documentation (12551 : Ratify Chair’s Approval of 2019 FDOT-MPO Joint Certification Statement)
FDOT Joint Certification
Part 2 – MPO
525-010-05b
POLICY PLANNING
11/17
Office of Policy Planning 1
Purpose
Each year, the District and the MPO must jointly certify the metropolitan transportation planning
process as described in 23 C.F.R. §450.336. The joint certification begins in January. This allows
time to incorporate recommended changes into the Draft Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP).
The District and the MPO create a joint certification package that includes a summary of
noteworthy achievements by the MPO and, if applicable, a list of any recommendations and/or
corrective actions.
The certification package and statement must be submitted to Central Office, Office of Policy
Planning (OPP) no later than June 1.
4.F.1
Packet Pg. 196 Attachment: 2019 Joint Certification Review Documentation (12551 : Ratify Chair’s Approval of 2019 FDOT-MPO Joint Certification Statement)
FDOT Joint Certification
Part 2 – MPO
525-010-05b
POLICY PLANNING
11/17
Office of Policy Planning 2
Certification Process
Please read and answer each question using the checkboxes to provide a “yes” or “no.” Below
each set of checkboxes is a box where an explanation for each answer is to be inserted. The
explanation given must be in adequate detail to explain the question.
FDOT’s MPO Joint Certification Statements and Assurances document must accompany the
completed Certification report. Please use the electronic form fields to fill out the Statements and
Assurances document. Once all the appropriate parties sign the Statements and Assurances,
scan it and email it with this completed Certification Document to your District MPO Liaison.
Please note that the District shall report the identification of, and provide status updates of any
corrective action or other issues identified during certification directly to the MPO Board. Once
the MPO has resolved the corrective action or issue to the satisfaction of the District, the District
shall report the resolution of the corrective action or issue to the MPO Board.
4.F.1
Packet Pg. 197 Attachment: 2019 Joint Certification Review Documentation (12551 : Ratify Chair’s Approval of 2019 FDOT-MPO Joint Certification Statement)
FDOT Joint Certification
Part 2 – MPO
525-010-05b
POLICY PLANNING
11/17
Office of Policy Planning 3
Part 2
Part 2 of the Joint Certification is to be completed by the MPO.
4.F.1
Packet Pg. 198 Attachment: 2019 Joint Certification Review Documentation (12551 : Ratify Chair’s Approval of 2019 FDOT-MPO Joint Certification Statement)
FDOT Joint Certification
Part 2 – MPO
525-010-05b
POLICY PLANNING
11/17
Office of Policy Planning 4
Part 2 Section 1: MPO Overview
1. Does the MPO have up-to-date agreements such as the interlocal agreement that creates the
MPO, the intergovernmental coordination and review agreement; and any other applicable
agreements? Please list all agreements and dates that they need to be readopted.
Please Check: Yes ☒ No ☐
1) Amended and Restated Interlocal Agreement for Creation of the Collier MPO –
requires review every 5 years, next review due 2/2020; 2) Interlocal Agreement for Joint
Regional Transportation Planning and Coordination between the Collier and Lee County
MPOs – review required every 5 years but automatically renews thus would have been
reviewed and renewed in 2014 and again in 2019 through 2024; UPDATE?;. 3)
Executed Staff Services Agreement and Lease Agreement with Collier County – Both
were renewed in May 2019 . 4) MPO Agreement for PL funding with FDOT – expires on
6/30/2020. 5) Intergovernmental Coordination Review and Public Transportation
Coordination Joint Participation Agreement – Executed on 11/25/2014, term of 5 years
and shall automatically renew at the end of 5 years for another five years thereafter.
2. Does the MPO coordinate the planning of projects that cross MPO boundaries with the other
MPO(s)?
Please Check: Yes ☒ No ☐
The Lee and Collier MPOs coordinate on development of regional roadway network,
regional nonmotorized network, regional transit service connections and regional project
priorities in accordance with the Interlocal Agreement between the two MPOs. The
Lee/Collier MPOs may enter into regional agreements for project specific undertakings
but there are none currently underway.
3. How does the MPOs planning process consider the 10 Planning Factors?
Please Check: Yes ☒ No ☐
The UPWP identifies tasks to be addressed over a two-year period. The UPWP
identifies the 10 planning factors and illustrates which task addresses each factor. This is
done in table format in the UPWP to ensure all 10 factors are being considered. In
addition, the Scope for the 2045 LRTP requires that all 10 factors are addressed.
4. How are the transportation plans and programs of the MPO based on a continuing,
comprehensive, and cooperative process?
Please Check: Yes ☒ No ☐
Continuing: The MPO’s planning and programming process is highly cyclical. Core
products – the LRTP, TIP, UPWP - must be delivered on an annual, two-year, or five-
year rotation meeting state and federal deadlines. The MPO regularly updates another
core product – the PPP – on an as-needed basis and is in process of amending it now to
address FHWA comments made at the December 2019 FMPP conference. Preparing for
4.F.1
Packet Pg. 199 Attachment: 2019 Joint Certification Review Documentation (12551 : Ratify Chair’s Approval of 2019 FDOT-MPO Joint Certification Statement)
FDOT Joint Certification
Part 2 – MPO
525-010-05b
POLICY PLANNING
11/17
Office of Policy Planning 5
the LRTP update is continuous as well. The MPO has several major studies/plans
underway that will inform the 2045 LRTP update – the Transportation System
Performance Report (TSPR) assessing the region’s congestion management system; the
Local Roads Safety Plan addressing vehicular and bike/ped safety; and a Transit Impact
Analysis. Comprehensive: The MPO’s planning and programming is comprehensive in
scope in that all of the aforementioned studies contribute to data gathering and analyses
on complex, multifaceted transportation planning issues that build layer-by-layer a
comprehensive approach to analysis and policy making by the MPO Board. Cooperative:
The MPO’s Mission Statement places emphasis on providing transportation planning
leadership through a collaborative effort. The MPO’s Strategic Plan establishes two goals
related to cooperation – Proactive Regional Collaboration and Improved Public Outreach.
The MPO strives to maintain a spirit of cooperation and collaboration with all of its
planning partners and to engage a broad cross-section of the community in MPO
planning
5. When was the MPOs Congestion Management Process last updated?
Please Check: Yes ☒ No ☐ N/A ☐
The Congestion Management Process was updated on 10/30/2017. In 2018, the MPO
issued its first Call for Projects using the 2017 CMP as a guide. The Congestion
Management Committee has completed its process of identifying, rating and ranking
projects and submitted a prioritized list to FDOT for review. The MPO Board adopted the
prioritized list in June 2019. The MPO has hired a consultant to develop the
Transportation System Performance Report which implements a significant component of
the CMP. The TSPR is likely to include recommendations for updating and amending the
CMP.
6. Has the MPO recently reviewed and/or updated its Public Participation Plan? If so, when?
Please Check: Yes ☒ No ☐
The PPP was last amended in 2019 in February 2019. Staff posted a draft amendment in
February 2020 to begin the mandatory 45-day public comment period before seeking
MPO Board approval. The purpose of the 2020 amendment is to make minor corrections
to transit related notification requirements and to address recommendations made by
FHWA at the December 2019 FMPP regarding adding specific references to coordinating
reviews with State and Federal Land Management Agencies, and including the text of
state and federal statutes.
7. Was the Public Participation Plan made available for public review for at least 45 days before
adoption?
Please Check: Yes ☒ No ☐
The 2019 amendment was adopted by the Board after the mandatory 45-day public
review period had expired. The draft 2020 amendment was posted to start the 45-day
public review process prior to the advisory committees endorsement and Board adoption.
4.F.1
Packet Pg. 200 Attachment: 2019 Joint Certification Review Documentation (12551 : Ratify Chair’s Approval of 2019 FDOT-MPO Joint Certification Statement)
FDOT Joint Certification
Part 2 – MPO
525-010-05b
POLICY PLANNING
11/17
Office of Policy Planning 6
8. Does the MPO utilize one of the methods of procurement identified in 2 C.F.R. 200.320 (a-f)?
Please Check: Yes ☒ No ☐
The Collier County Grants Management Office is highly trained on CFR 200 including
section 200.320 methods of procurement, which are rigorously followed by MPO staff
and County Procurement Office. Recent document review conducted by FDOT and
results of recent and current annual financial audits attest to compliance with CFR 200.
9. Does the MPO maintain sufficient records to detail the history of procurement? These records
will include, but are not limited to: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract
type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price.
Note: this documentation is required by 2 C.F.R. 200.324 (a) to be available upon request by the Federal awarding
agency, or pass-through entity when deemed necessary.
Please Check: Yes ☒ No ☐
Documentation required and maintained by Collier County Grants Management Office
during procurement process includes: rationale for method of procurement, selection of
contract type, contractor selection or rejection and basis for the contract price. Forms
maintained on each procurement project include Method of Procurement (MOP) and
Independent Cost Estimate (ICE) prepared by MPO staff.
10. Does the MPO have any intergovernmental or inter-agency agreements in place for
procurement or use of goods or services?
Please Check: Yes ☐ No ☒
N/A
11. What methods or systems does the MPO have in place to maintain oversight to ensure that
consultants or contractors are performing work in accordance with the terms, conditions and
specifications of their contracts or work orders?
Please Check: Yes ☒ No ☐
Each project manager is responsible for ensuring that consultants are performing work in
accordance with the terms, conditions and specifications of their contract. In addition,
invoices are routinely reviewed against contracts to ensure consistency. The MPO
Director’s review adds another checkpoint.
4.F.1
Packet Pg. 201 Attachment: 2019 Joint Certification Review Documentation (12551 : Ratify Chair’s Approval of 2019 FDOT-MPO Joint Certification Statement)
FDOT Joint Certification
Part 2 – MPO
525-010-05b
POLICY PLANNING
11/17
Office of Policy Planning 7
Part 2 Section 2: Finances and Invoicing
1. How does the MPO ensure that Federal-aid funds are expended in conformity with applicable
Federal and State laws, the regulations in 23 C.F.R. and 49 C.F.R., and policies and
procedures prescribed by FDOT and the Division Administrator of FHWA?
Collier County’s Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has a dedicated staff under
the Office of Grant Compliance (GCO) which oversees the administrative compliance of
the Federal and State grant funding to support the MPO. GCO works with the MPO to
ensure both County policies and procedures and grantors administrative requirements
are met. MPO personnel have an understanding of federal rule per the OMB
Circulars/UGG, Code of Federal Regulations and grant contract. Division personnel are
dedicated to attend grantor trainings, follow established County administrative and
coordination procedures.
2. How often does the MPO submit invoices to the District for review and reimbursement?
In accordance with the contract with FDOT, the Collier MPO submits their invoices on a
quarterly basis (for the three month period).
3. Is the MPO, as a standalone entity, a direct recipient of federal funds and in turn, subject to
an annual single audit?
Yes. The MPO conducts its single audit through use of the same firm as the County.
4. How does the MPO ensure their financial management system complies with the
requirements set forth in 2 C.F.R. §200.302?
The MPO uses SAP financial software through a Staff Services Agreement with Collier
County. SAP has a grants management module which segregates grant funding by a
unique set of identifiers such as Fund, Fund Center and Project number. A single project
is used to track each grant agreement and is further broken down into subsets to track
the UPWP individual tasks.
4.F.1
Packet Pg. 202 Attachment: 2019 Joint Certification Review Documentation (12551 : Ratify Chair’s Approval of 2019 FDOT-MPO Joint Certification Statement)
FDOT Joint Certification
Part 2 – MPO
525-010-05b
POLICY PLANNING
11/17
Office of Policy Planning 8
5. How does the MPO ensure records of costs incurred under the terms of the MPO Agreement
maintained and readily available upon request by FDOT at all times during the period of the
MPO Agreement, and for five years after final payment is made?
All County staff and the Clerk of Courts have access to grant agreements, amendments,
support documentation, federal circulars, UGG and regulations via Sharepoint and the
County’s electronic financial system SAP.
6. Is supporting documentation submitted, when required, by the MPO to FDOT in detail
sufficient for proper monitoring?
Yes, supporting documentation is submitted in detail when requested by FDOT.
7. How does the MPO comply with, and require its consultants and contractors to comply with
applicable Federal law pertaining to the use of Federal-aid funds?
The County’s GCO reviews all solicitations and purchases to ensure the inclusion of
federal provision and requirements within vendor (consultant and contractor)
contracts.
4.F.1
Packet Pg. 203 Attachment: 2019 Joint Certification Review Documentation (12551 : Ratify Chair’s Approval of 2019 FDOT-MPO Joint Certification Statement)
FDOT Joint Certification
Part 2 – MPO
525-010-05b
POLICY PLANNING
11/17
Office of Policy Planning 9
Part 2 Section 3: Title VI and ADA
1. Has the MPO signed an FDOT Title VI/Nondiscrimination Assurance, identified a person
responsible for the Title VI/ADA Program, and posted for public view a nondiscrimination policy
and complaint filing procedure?”
Please Check: Yes ☒ No ☐
The MPO’s Title VI Nondiscrimination Program Policy and Complaint Procedure are
included as Appendix D in the 2019 PPP. The PPP is posted on the MPO website for
public view and Title VI and ADA are referenced on every agenda the MPO posts for its
advisory committee and Board meetings. The MPO Executive Director is responsible for
the Title VI/ADA Program.
2. Do the MPO’s contracts and bids include the appropriate language, as shown in the
appendices of the Nondiscrimination Agreement with the State?
Please Check: Yes ☒ No ☐
The MPO’s contracts include the appropriate language as shown in the UPWP
Statements and Assurances, specifically the Nondiscrimination Agreement with FDOT.
3. Does the MPO have a procedure in place for the prompt processing and disposition of Title VI
and Title VIII complaints, and does this procedure comply with FDOT’s procedure?
Please Check: Yes ☒ No ☐
MPO has a Discrimination Complaint Procedure in place which was approved by the
Board on 5/11/2007. MPO staff incorporated an an updated, combined Policy and
Procedure and Complaint Form in the 2019 PPP.
4.F.1
Packet Pg. 204 Attachment: 2019 Joint Certification Review Documentation (12551 : Ratify Chair’s Approval of 2019 FDOT-MPO Joint Certification Statement)
FDOT Joint Certification
Part 2 – MPO
525-010-05b
POLICY PLANNING
11/17
Office of Policy Planning 10
4. Does the MPO collect demographic data to document nondiscrimination and equity in its plans,
programs, services, and activities?
Please Check: Yes ☒ No ☐
The 2019 PPP includes as Appendix E in the 2019 PPP, the MPO’s current update of
demographic data to document nondiscrimination and equity in its plans, programs,
services and activities. Traditionally Underserved Communities were identified as part of
the development of the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan, adopted on March 8, 2019.
The Environmental Justice criteria used for this Plan were minority status, poverty, no
access to a vehicle, and limited ability to speak English. EJ areas were defined as areas
where the criteria were 10% greater than the County average in each of those categories.
5. Has the MPO participated in any recent Title VI training, either offered by the State, organized
by the MPO, or some other form of training, in the past three years?
Please Check: Yes ☒ No ☐
MPO staff participated in 3-part FHWA Title VI/ADA/nondiscrimination webinar in July
2017. Webinar notes were shared during staff meetings and stored on MPO’s shared
drive for reference
6. Does the MPO keep on file for five years all complaints of ADA noncompliance received, and
for five years a record of all complaints in summary form?
Please Check: Yes ☒ No ☐
No formal complaints have been received. The MPO has established a template for
recording and tracking actions on complaints and will maintain the detailed log of
communications for 5 years.
4.F.1
Packet Pg. 205 Attachment: 2019 Joint Certification Review Documentation (12551 : Ratify Chair’s Approval of 2019 FDOT-MPO Joint Certification Statement)
FDOT Joint Certification
Part 2 – MPO
525-010-05b
POLICY PLANNING
11/17
Office of Policy Planning 11
Part 2 Section 4: Disadvantaged Business Enterprises
1. Does the MPO have a FDOT-approved Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) plan?
Please Check: Yes ☒ No ☐
The MPO adopted a Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Policy on May 12, 2006. This
policy is in accordance with FDOT's DBE Plan.
2. Does the MPO use the Equal Opportunity Compliance (EOC) system or other FDOT process
to ensure that consultants are entering bidders opportunity list information, as well as
accurately and regularly entering DBE commitments and payments?”
Please Check: Yes ☒ No ☐
The MPO tracks all DBE commitments and payments as requested by FDOT. FDOT is
in the process of releasing the Grant Application Process (GAP) System which will be
utilized to report DBE commitments and payments. The MPO will continue to track all
DBE compliance information and will report to FDOT as requested until the new system
is operational.
3. Does the MPO include the DBE policy statement in its contract language for consultants and
subconsultants?
Please Check: Yes ☒ No ☐
Each consultant is required to comply with the MPO’s DBE policy. The required DBE
language is included in each MPO contract.
4.F.1
Packet Pg. 206 Attachment: 2019 Joint Certification Review Documentation (12551 : Ratify Chair’s Approval of 2019 FDOT-MPO Joint Certification Statement)
FDOT Joint Certification
Part 2 – MPO
525-010-05b
POLICY PLANNING
11/17
Office of Policy Planning 12
Part 2 Section 5: Noteworthy Practices & Achievements
One purpose of the certification process is to identify improvements in the metropolitan
transportation planning process through recognition and sharing of noteworthy practices.
Please provide a list of the MPOs noteworthy practices and achievements below.
ACHIEVEMENTS: The MPO Board adopted the Golden Gate Walkable Community Study,
the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan and a major revision of the PPP – all in early 2019.
Beginning in the Summer of 2019, the MPO kicked off the development of the 2045 LRTP
and has completed the following: • Goals, Objectives and Decision-Making Framework•
Public Involvement Plan (and Social Media Outreach Strategy)• Existing + Proposed
Roadway Network – Map and Tables – submitted to FDOT in December 2019• 2015
and 2045 Report on Socio-economic Data – submitted to FDOT in January 2020. The MPO
became fully staffed for the first time in six years. MPO staff submitted the jurisdiction’s first
application for SUNTrails funding based on the newly adopted Bike/Ped Master Plan.
NOTEWORTHY PRACTICES: The MPO has greatly enhanced the quality of its project
sheets in the TIP by using in-house GIS capabilities and improving on the transfer of data
from FDOT directly into TIP spreadsheets. MPO staff has incorporated reporting on
Performance Measures and Targets into its Annual Report to the MPO Board for the past
two years thereby establishing the basis for monitoring and reporting on trends. The MPO
is continuing to expand its public outreach using the internet and social media. MPO staff
members have engaged in a variety of technical trainings to expand in-house professional
capability and higher level MPO staff are actively participating in regional conferences. The
MPO website was revamped to be much more user-friendly. Towards the latter part of
2019, staff developed an electronic format for the newsletter and prepared an edition to be
released in 2020 on a monthly basis rather than limited to twice a year.,
4.F.1
Packet Pg. 207 Attachment: 2019 Joint Certification Review Documentation (12551 : Ratify Chair’s Approval of 2019 FDOT-MPO Joint Certification Statement)
FDOT Joint Certification
Part 2 – MPO
525-010-05b
POLICY PLANNING
11/17
Office of Policy Planning 13
Part 2 Section 6: MPO Comments
The MPO may use this space to make any additional comments, if they desire. This
section is not mandatory, and its use is at the discretion of the MPO.
Please Explain
4.F.1
Packet Pg. 208 Attachment: 2019 Joint Certification Review Documentation (12551 : Ratify Chair’s Approval of 2019 FDOT-MPO Joint Certification Statement)
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OFFICE OF POLICY PLANNING
10/17/2019 Page 1 of 5
MPO FHWA Funds
Invoice Supporting Documentation Review Checklist
The MPO’s Supporting Documentation Review is to be completed at the frequency required by the MPO’s Risk
Assessment, as a part of the Annual MPO Joint Certification Process. The checklist should be completed and saved
with invoice documentation, uploaded to the SharePoint Site for tracking by Central Office, and forwarded to MPO for their
records.
Please note: Below you will be required to identify any comments, recommendations, or findings. Comments and
recommendations are at the discretion of the District, but findings must be supported by documentation, and identify
corrections that must be made for the MPO to be reimbursed. Findings factor into the MPOs level of risk, determined by
the Risk Assessment in the Annual Joint Certification.
* Indicates a Materially Significant Finding
MPO: Collier MPO
Contract: G0Y70 Date of
Review: 06/20/19 Review #: 1
Invoice
No.: FHWA-G0Y70-2 Invoice Period: 10/01/18-12/31/18 Reviewed By: Victoria Peters
Personnel Service (MPO staff salary & fringe)
Review the payroll register and compare to expenses being reimbursed. Select one staff member and confirm details
below.
Were personnel service expenses incurred within the Invoice Period? Yes ☒ No ☐
Employee’s time sheet selected for
review? Anne McLaughlin, MPO Executive Director
Does the payroll register fall within the dates match Invoice Period? Yes ☒ No ☐
*Do the hours shown on the payroll register match hours match hours requested? Yes ☒ No ☐
*Does the employee’s timesheet match the expenses being requested for reimbursement? Yes ☒ No ☐
*Are amounts shown on payroll register and task charges accurately recorded on Itemized
Expenditure Detail Report? Yes ☒ No ☐
Are fringe charges equitably distributed to all grants? Yes ☒ No ☐
Is the timesheet signed by an authorized MPO official? Yes ☒ No ☐
Comments and Recommendations on Personnel Services Expenses
None
Findings on Personnel Services Expenses
None
Consultant Services
Select one consultant invoice and confirm details below.
Were consultant service expenses incurred within the Invoice Period? Yes ☒ No ☐
4.F.1
Packet Pg. 209 Attachment: 2019 Joint Certification Review Documentation (12551 : Ratify Chair’s Approval of 2019 FDOT-MPO Joint Certification Statement)
MPO FHWA Funds
Invoice Supporting Documentation Review continued…
1/8/2020 Page 2 of 5
Consultant invoice selected for
review.
USF University of S. Florida, Invoice Date: 11/15/18, Invoice Number GM 00163111
*Are charges shown on invoice accurately recorded on Itemized Expenditure Detail Report?
Task 6 TDSP Q2 for: $23,169.91
Yes ☒ No ☐
Are the consultant services invoice dates of service within the Invoice Period?
Services through 10/31/18 Yes ☒ No ☐
*Are the task services documented in the progress report? See Page 9 of progress report Yes ☒ No ☐
*Is there documentation to show that invoice was paid? Yes ☒ No ☐
Comments and Recommendations on Consultant Services Expenses
None
Findings on Consultant Services Expenses
None
Travel Reimbursement
If travel reimbursement was requested on this invoice, select one travel reimbursement. Refer to the MPO’s travel
policies and regulations to answer questions below.
Were travel expenses incurred within the Invoice Period? Only their consultant incurred travel
expenditures – I did not consider them an “employee per se”. Yes ☐ No ☒
Employee’s travel reimbursement selected for
review?
N/A because there were no travel expenses by employees during this
period.
*Are charges shown on the travel form accurately recorded on the task’s Itemized Expenditure
Detail Report? N/A ** (Due to the above answer, updated comment as of 2/25/2020: I will
count this as a positive in the percentage tally for certification purposes)
Yes ☒ No ☐
Has the MPO established its own travel policy? See Attached Resolution; per FL
Statute112.61(14) (a) (5) Yes ☒ No ☐
Does the travel reimbursement comply with MPO or State travel policies and regulations? Yes ☒ No ☐
Are charges recorded on FDOT Contractor Travel Form (300-000-06)? Used older form #300-
000-01 Yes ☐ No ☒
Is travel request signed by an MPO authorized official? Yes ☒ No ☐
*Are travel charges supported by documentation as required by travel policy? Yes ☒ No ☐
Comments and Recommendations on Travel Reimbursement Expenses
Recommendation for Tindale-Oliver and all contractors to be provided the updated travel form # 300-000-06
Findings on Travel Reimbursement Expenses
1 Everything was in order in this section for Travel Reimbursement with the small exception of
them utilizing an older version of the travel form.
Direct Expenses
Select and review five direct expense line items.
Were direct expenses incurred within the Invoice Period? Yes ☒ No ☐
4.F.1
Packet Pg. 210 Attachment: 2019 Joint Certification Review Documentation (12551 : Ratify Chair’s Approval of 2019 FDOT-MPO Joint Certification Statement)
MPO FHWA Funds
Invoice Supporting Documentation Review continued…
1/8/2020 Page 3 of 5
#1 Direct expense selected for
review Verizon Invoice # 9818963687
Was the cost incurred within the Invoice Period? Yes ☒ No ☐
Is the expense for purchase of equipment over $5,000? (indicate prior approval in
findings/recommendation below) N/A Yes ☐ No ☒
*Is the expense allowable? Yes ☒ No ☐
*Is there documentation to show that invoice was paid? Yes ☒ No ☐
*Are charges shown on the invoice accurately recorded on the Itemized Expenditure Detail
Report? Yes ☒ No ☐
#2 Direct expense selected for
review Verizon Invoice # 981706104
Was the cost incurred within the Invoice Period? Yes ☒ No ☐
Is the expense for purchase of equipment over $5,000? (indicate prior proper approval in
findings/recommendation below) N/A Yes ☐ No ☒
*Is the expense allowable? Yes ☒ No ☐
*Is there documentation to show that invoice was paid? Yes ☒ No ☐
*Are charges shown on the invoice accurately recorded on the Itemized Expenditure Detail
Report? Task 1.4.3 Yes ☒ No ☐
#3 Direct expense selected for
review Naples news Invoice number 216690
Was the cost incurred within the Invoice Period? Yes¨11/1/18 – 11/30/18 Yes ☒ No ☐
Is the expense for purchase of equipment over $5,000? (indicate prior approval in
findings/recommendation below) N/A Yes ☐ No ☒
*Is the expense allowable? Yes ☒ No ☐
*Is there documentation to show that invoice was paid? Yes ☒ No ☐
*Are charges shown on the invoice accurately recorded on the Itemized Expenditure Detail
Report? Task 1.4.6 Yes ☒ No ☐
#4 Direct expense selected for
review Fed Ex, Invoice # 6-367-43535
Was the cost incurred within the Invoice Period? 11/09/18 Yes ☒ No ☐
Is the expense for purchase of equipment over $5,000? (indicate prior approval in
findings/recommendation below) N/A Yes ☐ No ☒
*Is the expense allowable? Yes ☒ No ☐
*Is there documentation to show that invoice was paid? Yes Yes ☒ No ☐
*Are charges shown on the invoice accurately recorded on the Itemized Expenditure Detail
Report? Yes Task 1.4.8 Yes ☒ No ☐
#5 Direct expense selected for
review Staples Invoice # 3392195145
Was the cost incurred within the Invoice Period? Yes ☒ No ☐
Is the expense for purchase of equipment over $5,000? (indicate prior approval in
findings/recommendation below) N/A Yes ☐ No ☒
*Is the expense allowable? Yes ☒ No ☐
4.F.1
Packet Pg. 211 Attachment: 2019 Joint Certification Review Documentation (12551 : Ratify Chair’s Approval of 2019 FDOT-MPO Joint Certification Statement)
MPO FHWA Funds
Invoice Supporting Documentation Review continued…
1/8/2020 Page 4 of 5
*Is there documentation to show that invoice was paid? Yes ☒ No ☐
*Are charges shown on the invoice accurately recorded on the Itemized Expenditure Detail
Report? Yes Task 1.4.5 Yes ☒ No ☐
Comments and Recommendations on Direct Expenses
None
Findings on Direct Expenses
None
Indirect Rate
If applicable, review MPO’s APPROVED Indirect Rate.
Does the MPO have an FDOT APPROVED indirect rate? N/A Yes ☐ No ☒
*If yes, does the indirect rate that is charged on the invoice agree with the approved indirect cost
allocation plan documented in the MPO’s UPWP? N/A Yes ☐ No ☐
Comments and Recommendations on Indirect Rate Charges
Does Not Apply to the Collier MPO
Findings on Indirect Rate Charges
None – N/A
General Comments, Recommendations, and Findings
Was the invoice’s supporting documentation found to be in good order? YES Yes ☒ No ☐
Was there evidence that a quality control process or procedure is in place? YES Yes ☒ No ☐
General Comments and Recommendations
The Collier MPO is fastidious w/their quality control over their invoices and work
seamlessly with the Collier County Grant’s Office. I recommended to please
share the updated Travel Form with all their contractors at the beginning of
each contract.
General Findings 1 This was the result of the contractor/consultant utilizing the
older version of the travel form.
Additionally, the Collier MPO was provided the updated travel form # 300-000-06 to provide to all
their contractors.
Invoice Supporting Documentation Review Checklist
Please provide the total number of *materially significant findings that were correct in Table 1. Table 1 will be used in the
Risk Assessment that is part of the annual Joint Certification to evaluate the MPO’s risk level.
4.F.1
Packet Pg. 212 Attachment: 2019 Joint Certification Review Documentation (12551 : Ratify Chair’s Approval of 2019 FDOT-MPO Joint Certification Statement)
MPO FHWA Funds
Invoice Supporting Documentation Review continued…
1/8/2020 Page 5 of 5
Table 1. Invoice Supporting Documentation Review Checklist Summary
Description Yes Total
*Materially Significant Findings 23 24
4.F.1
Packet Pg. 213 Attachment: 2019 Joint Certification Review Documentation (12551 : Ratify Chair’s Approval of 2019 FDOT-MPO Joint Certification Statement)
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OFFICE OF POLICY PLANNING
5/9/2019 Page 1 of 3
TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (TIP)
REVIEW CHECKLIST
The following TIP Review Checklist is provided to assist in the review of the TIP. This checklist should be completed and included in the TIP
submittal package to OPP. Comments should be categorized as:
Editorial: Comments may be addressed by MPO, but would not affect approval of the document, i.e., grammatical, spelling and other
related errors.
Enhancement: Comments may be addressed by MPO, but would not affect approval of the document, i.e., improve the quality of the
document and the understanding for the public (improving graphics, re-packaging of the document, use of plain language, reformatting for
clarity, removing redundant language).
Critical: Comment MUST be addressed to meet minimum state and federal requirements to obtain approval. The reviewer must clearly
identify the applicable state or federal policies, regulations, guidance, procedures or statues that the document does not conform with.
MPO: Collier MPO Fiscal Years
included: FY20 – FY24
Review #: 1 Date of Review: May, 2019 Reviewed by: Victoria Peters
TIP Format & Content
Does the cover include MPO name, correct fiscal years covered, MPO adoption date? Yes ☒ No ☐
Choose an item. Click here to enter comments
Does the Table of Contents show the title of each section with correct page number? Yes ☒ No ☐
Choose an item. Click here to enter comments
Does TIP include an endorsement that it was developed following state and federal requirements and include date
of official MPO approval? This would be an MPO resolution or signed signature block on cover. Yes ☒ No ☐
Choose an item. Click here to enter comments
Does TIP include a list of definitions, abbreviations, funding and phase codes and acronyms? Yes ☒ No ☐
Choose an item. Click here to enter comments
TIP Narrative
Does the TIP begin with a statement of purpose (provide a prioritization of projects covering a five-year period
that is consistent with LRTP, contains all transportation projects MPA funded with FHWA & FTA funds and
regionally significant projects regardless of funding source)? [23 C.F.R. 450.326(a)]; [49 U.S.C. Chapter 53]
Yes ☒ No ☐
Choose an item. Click here to enter comments
Was the TIP developed by MPO in cooperation with the state and public transit operator, who provided the MPO
with estimates of available Federal and State funds for the MPO to develop the financial plan? [s. 339.175(8) F.S.];
[23 C.F.R. 450.326(a)]
Yes ☒ No ☐
Choose an item. Click here to enter comments
4.F.1
Packet Pg. 214 Attachment: 2019 Joint Certification Review Documentation (12551 : Ratify Chair’s Approval of 2019 FDOT-MPO Joint Certification Statement)
TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Review Checklist continued…
5/9/2019 Page 2 of 3
Does the TIP demonstrate that there are sufficient funds (federal, state, local and private) to implement proposed
transportation system improvements, identifies any innovative financing techniques through comparison of
revenues and costs for each year? It is recommended that the TIP include a table(s) that compares the funding
sources and amounts, by year to the total project costs. [23 C.F.R. 450.326(k)]; [23 C.F.R. 450.326(j)]; [s.
339.175(8)(c)(3) F.S].
Yes ☒ No ☐
Choose an item. Click here to enter comments
Does the TIP describe project selection process and state that it is consistent with the federal requirements in
23 C.F.R 450.322(b) and for non-TMA MPOs 23 C.F.R. 450.322(c)? Yes ☒ No ☐
Choose an item.
Does the TIP identify the MPO’s criteria and process for prioritizing implementation of the transportation plan
elements (including multimodal tradeoffs) for inclusion in the TIP and explain any changes in priorities from the
previous TIP? The MPO’s TIP project priorities must be consistent with the LRTP. [23 C.F.R 450.326(n)(1)]
Yes ☒ No ☐
Choose an item. Collier’s TIP Priorities are consistent with their LRTP.
Does the TIP describe how projects are consistent with MPO’s LRTP and to the extent feasible, with port and
aviation masterplans, public transit development plans, and approved local government comprehensive plans for
those local governments located within the MPO area? [s. 339.175(8)(a) F.S.]
Yes ☒ No ☐
Choose an item. Click here to enter comments
Does the TIP cross reference projects with corresponding LRTP projects, when appropriate? [s. 339.175(8)(c)(7)
F.S.] Yes ☒ No ☐
Choose an item. Click here to enter comments
Does the TIP include the FDOT Annual List of Obligated Projects of projects or a link? The annual listing is located
for download HERE. [23 C.F.R. 450.334]; [s.339.175(8)(h), F.S.] Yes ☒ No ☐
Choose an item. Click here to enter comments
Was the TIP developed with input from the public that is consistent with the MPO’s PPP? [23 C.F.R. 450.316]; [23
C.F.R. 450.326(b)]; The document should outline techniques used to reach citizens (flyers, websites, meeting
notices, billboards, etc.)
Yes ☒ No ☐
Choose an item. Click here to enter comments
Does the TIP discuss the MPO’s current FDOT annual certification and past FHWA/FTA quadrennial certification?
MPO should include anticipated date of next FHWA/FTA quadrennial certification. Yes ☐ No ☒
Choose an item. The Collier MPO revised their TIP to include the date of the next FHWA/FTA quadrennial certification after I recommended this at
their May 20, 2019 TAC meeting.
Does the TIP discuss of the congestion management process? All MPOs are required to have a congestion
management process that provides for the effective management process that provides for the effective
management and operation of new and existing facilities using travel demand reduction and operational
management strategies. S 339.175(6)(c)(1), F.S.
Yes ☒ No ☐
Choose an item. Click here to enter comments
Does the TIP discuss Transportation Disadvantaged (TD) services developed and a description of costs and
revenues from TD services, as well as a list of improvements funded with TD funds? [s.427.015(1) F.S. AND 41-
2.009(2) F.A.C.
Yes ☒ No ☐
Choose an item. Click here to enter comments
Does the TIP discuss how, once implemented, will make progress toward achieving the performance targets for:
✓ Safety performance measures
Yes ☒ No ☐
4.F.1
Packet Pg. 215 Attachment: 2019 Joint Certification Review Documentation (12551 : Ratify Chair’s Approval of 2019 FDOT-MPO Joint Certification Statement)
TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Review Checklist continued…
5/9/2019 Page 3 of 3
✓ System performance measures
✓ Bridge performance measures
✓ Pavement performance measures
✓ State asset management plan
o Including risk to off-system facilities during emergency events (if applicable)
✓ State freight plan
If the MPO used the Performance Measures Template, they will have met requirements.
[23.C.F.R 450.326(c)]
Choose an item. While the Collier MPO was developing their TIP, the Performance Measures Template was not yet available so they included all of
them on their own without the template.
Does the TIP discuss anticipated effect of achieving the performance targets identified in the LRTP, linking
investment priorities to those performance targets for:
✓ Safety performance measures
✓ System performance measures
✓ Bridge performance measures
✓ Pavement performance measures
✓ State asset management plan
✓ State freight plan
If the MPO used the Performance Measures Template, they will have met requirements.
[23.C.F.R 450.326(d)]
Yes ☒ No ☐
Choose an item. Click here to enter comments
Detail Project Listing for the Five Fiscal Years
Does each project in the TIP document shall include the following information?
✓ Sufficient description of project (type of work, termini, and length)
✓ Financial Project Number (FPN)
✓ Estimated total project cost and year anticipated funding
✓ Page number or identification number where project can be found in LRTP (spot check)
✓ Category of Federal Funds and source(s) of non-Federal Funds
✓ FTA section number included in project title or description
✓ Responsible agency
Yes ☒ No ☐
Choose an item. Click here to enter comments
TIP Review
Did the MPO upload the document into the MPO Document Portal for review by District staff, Office of Policy
Planning, Florida Commission for the Transportation Disadvantaged, Bureau of Community Planning, FTA, &
FHWA?
Yes ☒ No ☐
Choose an item. They did not have access so I uploaded it on their behalf was which also suggested by OPP.
4.F.1
Packet Pg. 216 Attachment: 2019 Joint Certification Review Documentation (12551 : Ratify Chair’s Approval of 2019 FDOT-MPO Joint Certification Statement)
Florida Department of Transportation
RON DESANTIS
GOVERNOR 605 Suwannee Street
Tallahassee, FL 32399-0450
KEVIN J. THIBAULT, P.E.
SECRETARY
Safety, Mobility, Innovation
www.fdot.gov
APPENDIX A
TIP CORRESPONDENCE
4.F.1
Packet Pg. 217 Attachment: 2019 Joint Certification Review Documentation (12551 : Ratify Chair’s Approval of 2019 FDOT-MPO Joint Certification Statement)
2
TIP CORRESPONDENCE
FDOT:
1. Coordination with MPO Sr Planner throughout TIP development cycle regarding: Project
Prior Cost, Lead Agency, Project Lengths and Work Summary’s for Highway Maintenance,
Aviation, capacity projects and maps.
2. Additional discussions including placement of Planning projects and others such as the
TIGER Grant reflected in the TIP Appendix for consistency with UPWP and transparency
purposes.
3. FDOT Transit Related Comments:
- Projects that are not yet funded at this time for FY 20 because we are waiting not only for
them to be programed but also for Schedule B to come out, which is likely to be in
September/October.
- The TIP includes projects that have programmed funding attached to them. When they are
programmed, the MPO will adjust the TIP as per FDOT recommendation.
- NOGAs to award vehicles and vehicle equipment: New NOGAs will be generated for FY20
but they have not been programmed or funded yet.
FHWA:
1. Commented on including TIP documentation regarding coordination efforts with FWS, NPS
and Bureau of Indian Affairs of the adjacent federal lands within the MPO’s region.
2. Additional coordination regarding forecasted revenues and the fiscal constraint page.
4.F.1
Packet Pg. 218 Attachment: 2019 Joint Certification Review Documentation (12551 : Ratify Chair’s Approval of 2019 FDOT-MPO Joint Certification Statement)
3
TIP CHECKLIST
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OFFICE OF POLICY PLANNING
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (TIP)
REVIEW CHECKLIST
The following TIP Review Checklist is provided to assist in the review of the TIP. This checklist should be completed and
included in the TIP submittal package to OPP. Comments should be categorized as:
Editorial: Comments may be addressed by MPO, but would not affect approval of the document, i.e., grammatical, spelling and
other related errors.
Enhancement: Comments may be addressed by MPO, but would not affect approval of the document, i.e., improve the quality of
the document and the understanding for the public (improving graphics, re-packaging of the document, use of plain language,
reformatting for clarity, removing redundant language).
Critical: Comment MUST be addressed to meet minimum state and federal requirements to obtain approval. The reviewer must
clearly identify the applicable state or federal policies, regulations, guidance, procedures or statues that the document does not
conform with.
MPO: Collier MPO Fiscal Years
included: FY20 – FY24
Review #: 1 Date of Review: May, 2019 Reviewed by: Victoria Peters
TIP Format & Content
Does the cover include MPO name, correct fiscal years covered, MPO adoption date? Yes ☒ No ☐
Choose an item. Click here to enter comments
Does the Table of Contents show the title of each section with correct page number? Yes ☒ No ☐
Choose an item. Click here to enter comments
Does TIP include an endorsement that it was developed following state and federal requirements and include date
of official MPO approval? This would be an MPO resolution or signed signature block on cover. Yes ☒ No ☐
Choose an item. Click here to enter comments
Does TIP include a list of definitions, abbreviations, funding and phase codes and acronyms? Yes ☒ No ☐
Choose an item. Click here to enter comments
4.F.1
Packet Pg. 219 Attachment: 2019 Joint Certification Review Documentation (12551 : Ratify Chair’s Approval of 2019 FDOT-MPO Joint Certification Statement)
4
TIP Narrative
Does the TIP begin with a statement of purpose (provide a prioritization of projects covering a five-year period that
is consistent with LRTP, contains all transportation projects MPA funded with FHWA & FTA funds and regionally
significant projects regardless of funding source)? [23 C.F.R. 450.326(a)]; [49 U.S.C. Chapter 53]
Yes ☒ No ☐
Choose an item. Click here to enter comments
Was the TIP developed by MPO in cooperation with the state and public transit operator, who provided the MPO
with estimates of available Federal and State funds for the MPO to develop the financial plan? [s. 339.175(8) F.S.];
[23 C.F.R. 450.326(a)]
Yes ☒ No ☐
Choose an item. Click here to enter comments
Does the TIP demonstrate that there are sufficient funds (federal, state, local and private) to implement proposed
transportation system improvements, identifies any innovative financing techniques through comparison of
revenues and costs for each year? It is recommended that the TIP include a table(s) that compares the funding
sources and amounts, by year to the total project costs. [23 C.F.R. 450.326(k)]; [23 C.F.R. 450.326(j)]; [s.
339.175(8)(c)(3) F.S].
Yes ☒ No ☐
Choose an item. Click here to enter comments
Does the TIP describe project selection process and state that it is consistent with the federal requirements in
23 C.F.R 450.322(b) and for non-TMA MPOs 23 C.F.R. 450.322(c)? Yes ☒ No ☐
Choose an item.
Does the TIP identify the MPO’s criteria and process for prioritizing implementation of the transportation plan
elements (including multimodal tradeoffs) for inclusion in the TIP and explain any changes in priorities from the
previous TIP? The MPO’s TIP project priorities must be consistent with the LRTP. [23 C.F.R 450.326(n)(1)]
Yes ☒ No ☐
Choose an item. Collier’s TIP Priorities are consistent with their LRTP.
Does the TIP describe how projects are consistent with MPO’s LRTP and to the extent feasible, with port and
aviation masterplans, public transit development plans, and approved local government comprehensive plans for
those local governments located within the MPO area? [s. 339.175(8)(a) F.S.]
Yes ☒ No ☐
Choose an item. Click here to enter comments
Does the TIP cross reference projects with corresponding LRTP projects, when appropriate? [s. 339.175(8)(c)(7)
F.S.]
Yes ☒ No ☐
Choose an item. Click here to enter comments
Does the TIP include the FDOT Annual List of Obligated Projects of projects or a link? The annual listing is
located for download HERE. [23 C.F.R. 450.334]; [s.339.175(8)(h), F.S.]
Yes ☒ No ☐
Choose an item. Click here to enter comments
Was the TIP developed with input from the public that is consistent with the MPO’s PPP? [23 C.F.R. 450.316]; [23
C.F.R. 450.326(b)]; The document should outline techniques used to reach citizens (flyers, websites, meeting
notices, billboards, etc.)
Yes ☒ No ☐
Choose an item. Click here to enter comments
Does the TIP discuss the MPO’s current FDOT annual certification and past FHWA/FTA quadrennial certification?
MPO should include anticipated date of next FHWA/FTA quadrennial certification.
Yes ☐ No ☒
Choose an item. The Collier MPO revised their TIP to include the date of the next FHWA/FTA quadrennial certification after I recommended this at
4.F.1
Packet Pg. 220 Attachment: 2019 Joint Certification Review Documentation (12551 : Ratify Chair’s Approval of 2019 FDOT-MPO Joint Certification Statement)
5
their May 20, 2019 TAC meeting.
Does the TIP discuss of the congestion management process? All MPOs are required to have a congestion
management process that provides for the effective management process that provides for the effective management
and operation of new and existing facilities using travel demand reduction and operational managemen t strategies.
S 339.175(6)(c)(1), F.S.
Yes ☒ No ☐
Choose an item. Click here to enter comments
Does the TIP discuss Transportation Disadvantaged (TD) services developed and a description of costs and
revenues from TD services, as well as a list of improvements funded with TD funds? [s.427.015(1) F.S. AND 41-
2.009(2) F.A.C.
Yes ☒ No ☐
Choose an item. Click here to enter comments
Does the TIP discuss how, once implemented, will make progress toward achieving the performance targets for:
✓ Safety performance measures
✓ System performance measures
✓ Bridge performance measures
✓ Pavement performance measures
✓ State asset management plan
o Including risk to off-system facilities during emergency events (if applicable)
✓ State freight plan
If the MPO used the Performance Measures Template, they will have met requirements.
[23.C.F.R 450.326(c)]
Yes ☒ No ☐
Choose an item. While the Collier MPO was developing their TIP, the Performance Measures Template was not yet available so they included all of
them on their own without the template.
Does the TIP discuss anticipated effect of achieving the performance targets identified in the LRTP, linking
investment priorities to those performance targets for:
✓ Safety performance measures
✓ System performance measures
✓ Bridge performance measures
✓ Pavement performance measures
✓ State asset management plan
✓ State freight plan
If the MPO used the Performance Measures Template, they will have met requirements.
[23.C.F.R 450.326(d)]
Yes ☒ No ☐
Choose an item. Click here to enter comments
Detail Project Listing for the Five Fiscal Years
Does each project in the TIP document shall include the following information?
✓ Sufficient description of project (type of work, termini, and length)
✓ Financial Project Number (FPN)
✓ Estimated total project cost and year anticipated funding
✓ Page number or identification number where project can be found in LRTP (spot check)
✓ Category of Federal Funds and source(s) of non-Federal Funds
✓ FTA section number included in project title or description
Yes ☒ No ☐
4.F.1
Packet Pg. 221 Attachment: 2019 Joint Certification Review Documentation (12551 : Ratify Chair’s Approval of 2019 FDOT-MPO Joint Certification Statement)
6
✓ Responsible agency
Choose an item. Click here to enter comments
TIP Review
Did the MPO upload the document into the MPO Document Portal for review by District staff, Office of Policy
Planning, Florida Commission for the Transportation Disadvantaged, Bureau of Community Planning, FTA, &
FHWA?
Yes ☒ No ☐
Choose an item. They did not have access, so I uploaded it on their behalf was which also suggested by OPP.
4.F.1
Packet Pg. 222 Attachment: 2019 Joint Certification Review Documentation (12551 : Ratify Chair’s Approval of 2019 FDOT-MPO Joint Certification Statement)
4.F.1
Packet Pg. 223 Attachment: 2019 Joint Certification Review Documentation (12551 : Ratify Chair’s Approval of 2019 FDOT-MPO Joint Certification Statement)
4.F.1
Packet Pg. 224 Attachment: 2019 Joint Certification Review Documentation (12551 : Ratify Chair’s Approval of 2019 FDOT-MPO Joint Certification Statement)
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MPO JOINT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT
525-010-05c
POLICY PLANNING
02/18
Office of Policy Planning 1
Pursuant to the requirements of 23 U.S.C. 134(k)(5) and 23 CFR 450.334(a), the Department
and the MPO have performed a review of the certification status of the metropolitan
transportation planning process for the Collier MPO with respect to the requirements of:
1. 23 U.S.C. 134 and 49 U.S.C. 5303;
2. Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended (42 U.S.C. 2000d-1) and 49 C.F.R. Part 21
3. 49 U.S.C. 5332 prohibiting discrimination on the basis of race, color, creed, national origin, sex,
or age in employment or business opportunity;
4. Section 1101(b) of the FAST Act and 49 C.F.R. Part 26 regarding the involvement of
disadvantaged business enterprises in USDOT funded projects;
5. 23 C.F.R. Part 230 regarding the implementation of an equal employment opportunity program
on Federal and Federal-aid highway construction contracts;
6. The provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 12101 et seq.) and the
regulations found in 49 C.F.R. Parts 27, 37, and 38;
7. The Older Americans Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 6101) prohibiting discrimination on the basis
of age in programs or activities receiving Federal financial assistance;
8. Section 324 of 23 U.S.C. regarding the prohibition of discrimination on the basis of gender; and
9. Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 794) and 49 C.F.R. Part 27 regarding
discrimination against individuals with disabilities.
Included in this certification package is a summary of noteworthy achievements by the MPO,
attachments associated with these achievements, and (if applicable) a list of any
recommendations and/or corrective actions. The contents of this Joint Certification Package
have been reviewed by the MPO and accurately reflect the results of the joint certification review
meeting held on May 8, 2020.
Based on a joint review and evaluation, the Florida Department of Transportation and the
Collier MPO recommend that the Metropolitan Planning Process for the Collier MPO be
certified.
Name: LK Nandam, P.E. Date
Title: District Secretary (or designee)
Name: Chairwoman Elaine Middelstaedt Date
Title: MPO Chairman (or designee)
4.F.1
Packet Pg. 225 Attachment: 2019 Joint Certification Review Documentation (12551 : Ratify Chair’s Approval of 2019 FDOT-MPO Joint Certification Statement)
4.F.2
Packet Pg. 226 Attachment: FDOT-MPO Joint Certification Statement 2019 (12551 : Ratify Chair’s Approval of 2019 FDOT-MPO Joint Certification Statement)
06/12/2020
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Annual Review and Adoption of the Updated Local Coordinating Board (LCB) for the
Transportation Disadvantaged (TD) By-Laws
OBJECTIVE: For the MPO Board to adopt the revisions to the Local Coordinating Board (LCB) by-
laws.
CONSIDERATIONS: In accordance with the TD Planning Grant, the LCB is required to review and
approve their bylaws annually. The LCB bylaws have been revised to address scriveners errors. The
proposed changes are shown in strikethrough/underline format.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: The LCB reviewed and endorsed the changes to the by-laws
at their March 4, 2020 meeting.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the Board adopt the changes to the LCB by-laws.
Prepared By: Josephine Medina, Senior Planner
ATTACHMENT(S)
1. Strikethrough/Underline version of Bylaws (PDF)
2. Bylaws with changes accepted (PDF)
4.G
Packet Pg. 227
06/12/2020
COLLIER COUNTY
Metropolitan Planning Organization
Item Number: 4.G
Doc ID: 12570
Item Summary: Annual Review and Adoption of the Updated Local Coordinating Board (LCB)
for the Transportation Disadvantaged (TD) By-Laws
Meeting Date: 06/12/2020
Prepared by:
Title: – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Karen Intriago
06/04/2020 7:34 AM
Submitted by:
Title: Executive Director - MPO – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Anne McLaughlin
06/04/2020 7:34 AM
Approved By:
Review:
Metropolitan Planning Organization Brandy Otero MPO Analyst Review Completed 06/04/2020 8:51 AM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin MPO Executive Director Review Completed 06/04/2020 9:10 AM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin Meeting Pending 06/12/2020 9:00 AM
4.G
Packet Pg. 228
BY-LAWS
of the
COLLIER COUNTY
Transportation Disadvantaged
Local Coordinating Board
Endorsed by LCB: March 13 4, 202019
Adopted by MPO: JuneApril 12, 202019
4.G.1
Packet Pg. 229 Attachment: Strikethrough/Underline version of Bylaws (12570 : Annual Review and Adoption of the Updated Local Coordinating Board)
i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Article Page
I Preamble ........................................................................................................................... 1
Preamble .................................................................................................. 1
II Name and Purpose ............................................................................................................ 1
Name ........................................................................................................ 1
Purpose .................................................................................................... 1
III Membership, Appointment, Term of Office, and Termination
of Membership ........................................................................................ 1
Voting Members ...................................................................................... 1
Alternate Members ................................................................................ 2
Non-voting Members .............................................................................. 3
Terms of Appointment ........................................................................... 3
Termination of Membership .................................................................. 3
IV Officers and Duties ........................................................................................................... 3
Number .................................................................................................... 3
Chairperson ............................................................................................. 3
Vice-Chairperson .................................................................................... 4
V LCB Meetings .................................................................................................................... 4
Regular Meetings ................................................................................... 4
Notice of Meetings ................................................................................... 4
Quorum .................................................................................................... 4
Voting ....................................................................................................... 4
Parliamentary Procedures .................................................................... 4
Public Meetings …………………………………………………...……5
VI Staff .................................................................................................................................... 5
General .................................................................................................... 5
VII LCB Duties ....................................................................................................................... 5
LCB Duties ............................................................................................. 5
4.G.1
Packet Pg. 230 Attachment: Strikethrough/Underline version of Bylaws (12570 : Annual Review and Adoption of the Updated Local Coordinating Board)
ii
VIII Subcommittees ................................................................................................................. 7
Subcommittees ....................................................................................... 7
IX Communications with other Agencies and Entities ...................................................... 7
General .................................................................................................... 7
X Certification ...................................................................................................................... 7
4.G.1
Packet Pg. 231 Attachment: Strikethrough/Underline version of Bylaws (12570 : Annual Review and Adoption of the Updated Local Coordinating Board)
1
BY-LAWS OF THE
COLLIER COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DISADVANTAGED
LOCAL COORDINATING BOARD
ARTICLE I: PREAMBLE
Section 1: Preamble
The following sets forth the By-Laws, which shall serve to guide the proper functioning of the
coordination of transportation services provided to the transportation disadvantaged through the
Collier County Transportation Disadvantaged Program. The intent is to provide procedures and
policies for fulfilling the requirements of Chapter 427, Florida Statutes, Rule 41-2, Florida
Administrative Code (FAC), and subsequent laws setting forth requirements for the coordination
of transportation services to the transportation disadvantaged.
ARTICLE II: NAME AND PURPOSE
Section 1: Name
The name of the Local Coordinating Board shall be the Collier County Transportation
Disadvantaged Local Coordinating Board (LCB).
Section 2: Purpose
The primary purpose of the LCB is to assist the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization
(MPO) in identifying local service needs and providing information, advice and direction to the
Community Transportation Coordinator (CTC) on the coordination of services to be provided to
the transportation disadvantaged pursuant to Chapter 427.0157, Florida Statutes.
ARTICLE III: MEMBERSHIP, APPOINTMENT, TERM OF OFFICE,
AND TERMINATION OF MEMBERSHIP
Section 1: Voting Members
In accordance with Rule 41-2.012, Florida Administration Code, all members of the Board shall
be appointed by the designated official planning agency. The designated official planning
agency for Collier County is the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO). The
following agencies or groups shall be represented on the LCB as voting members:
A. A Collier County elected official, who has been appointed to serve as chairperson;
B. A local representative of the Florida Department of Transportation;
C. A local representative of the Florida Department of Children and Family Services;
4.G.1
Packet Pg. 232 Attachment: Strikethrough/Underline version of Bylaws (12570 : Annual Review and Adoption of the Updated Local Coordinating Board)
2
D. A representative of the Public Education Community;
E. A local representative of the Florida Division of Vocational Rehabilitation or the
Division of Blind Services, representing the Department of Education;
F. A person who is recognized by the local Veterans Service Office representing the
veterans in the county;
G. A person who is recognized by the Florida Association for Community Action
(President or Designee) as representing the economically disadvantaged in the
county;
H. A person over sixty years of age representing the elderly in the county;
I. A person with a disability representing persons with disabilities in the county;
J. Two citizen advocate representatives in the county, one who must be a person
who uses the transportation service(s) of the system as their primary means of
transportation;
K. A local representative of children at risk;
L. A local representative of the Florida Department of Elder Affairs;
M. A local representative of the local medical community;
N. A representative of the Southwest Florida Regional Workforce Development
Board;
O. An experienced representative of the local private for profit transportation
industry. If such representative is not available, a local private non-profit
representative will be appointed, except where said representative is also the
CTC, or a transportation provider under contract to the management company for
the CTC; and
P. A representative of the Florida Agency for Health Care Administration; and
Q. A local representative of the Agency for Persons with Disabilities.
Since Collier Area Transit (CAT) is operated by the Collier County Board of County
Commissioners, which is also the CTC, it is not represented on the LCB, pursuant to Rule 41-
2.012, Florida Administrative Code.
Section 2: Alternate Members
Alternates are to be appointed in writing to the MPO by an agency representative. Non-agency
alternates may be appointed by the MPO, if desired. Each alternate may vote only in the absence
of that member on a one-vote-per-member basis. Alternates for a LCB member who cannot
4.G.1
Packet Pg. 233 Attachment: Strikethrough/Underline version of Bylaws (12570 : Annual Review and Adoption of the Updated Local Coordinating Board)
3
attend a meeting must be a representative of the same interest as the primary member.
Section 3: Non-Voting Members
Upon a majority vote of a quorum of the LCB, technical advisors (non-voting members) may be
recommended to the Collier MPO for its approval for the purpose of providing the LCB with
technical advice as necessary.
Section 4: Terms of Appointment
Except for the Chairperson and state agency representatives, the non-agency members of the
LCB shall be appointed for three (3) year terms. The Chairperson shall serve until being replaced
by the Collier MPO. No employee of a CTC, or transportation provider under contract to the
management company for the CTC, shall serve as a voting member of the LCB. However, an
elected official serving as Chairperson of the LCB, or another governmental employee who is
not employed for the purpose of making provisions for transportation and is not directly
supervised by the CTC may serve as a voting member of the LCB.
Section 5: Termination of Membership
Any member of the LCB may resign at any time by notice in writing to the Chairperson. Unless
otherwise specified in such notice, such resignation shall take effect upon receipt thereof by the
Chairperson. Each member of the LCB is expected to demonstrate his/her interest in the LCB's
activities through attendance of the scheduled meetings, except for reasons of an unavoidable
nature. In each instance of an unavoidable absence, the absent member should ensure that
his/her alternate will attend. The Collier MPO shall review, and consider rescinding, the
appointment of any voting member of the LCB who fails to attend three (3) consecutive
regularly meetings or four of the previous six regularly scheduled meetings. If the Collier MPO
Board determines that the number of absences incurred by a LCB member (excused or
unexcused) is unacceptable, it may remove that member by a majority vote of the MPO Board
members present.
Each member of the LCB is expected to conduct himself/herself in a professional and ethical
manner. If it is found that a LCB member has engaged in practices that do not comply with
Section 112.3143, Florida Statutes, or has otherwise conducted himself/herself in an unethical or
unprofessional manner, the Collier MPO staff shall recommend to the MPO Board that he/she be
removed. The Collier MPO Board may remove such a member by a majority vote of the MPO
members present.
ARTICLE IV: OFFICERS AND DUTIES
Section 1: Number
The officers of the LCB shall be a Chairperson and a Vice-Chairperson.
Section 2: Chairperson
4.G.1
Packet Pg. 234 Attachment: Strikethrough/Underline version of Bylaws (12570 : Annual Review and Adoption of the Updated Local Coordinating Board)
4
The Collier MPO Board shall appoint an elected official from Collier County or one of its
municipalities to serve as the official Chairperson for all LCB meetings. The Chairperson shall
preside at all meetings, and in the event of his/her absence, or at his/her direction; the Vice-
Chairperson shall assume the powers and duties of the Chairperson. The Chairperson shall serve
until their elected term of office has expired or replaced by the Collier MPO.
Section 3: Vice-Chairperson
The LCB shall hold a meeting each year for the purpose of electing a Vice-Chairperson. The
Vice-Chairperson shall be elected by a majority vote of a quorum of the LCB members. The
Vice-Chairperson shall serve a term of one year starting with the next meeting. In the event of
the Chairperson’s absence, the Vice-Chairperson shall assume the duties of the Chairperson and
conduct the meeting. The Vice-Chairperson may serve more than one term.
ARTICLE V: LCB MEETINGS
Section 1: Regular Meetings
The LCB shall meet as often as necessary in order to meet its responsibilities. However, as
required by Chapter 427.0157, Florida Statutes, the LCB shall meet at least quarterly.
Section 2: Notice of Meetings
Notices and tentative agendas shall be sent to all LCB members, other interested parties, and the
news media within a reasonable amount of time prior to the LCB meeting. Such notice shall
state the date, time and the place of the meeting.
Section 3: Quorum
A quorum shall consist of seven (7) of the voting LCB members, or their designated alternates,
at all meetings of the Board in order to conduct business.
Section 4: Voting
At all meetings of the LCB at which a quorum is present, all matters, except as otherwise
expressly required by law or these By-Laws, shall be decided by the vote of a majority of the
members of the LCB present.
Section 5: By-Laws and Parliamentary Procedures
The LCB shall develop and adopt a set of by-laws. The by-laws shall state that the LCB will
conduct business using parliamentary procedures according to Robert's Rules of Order, except
when in conflict with these By-Laws. The by-laws shall be reviewed, updated (if necessary) and
adopted annually.
4.G.1
Packet Pg. 235 Attachment: Strikethrough/Underline version of Bylaws (12570 : Annual Review and Adoption of the Updated Local Coordinating Board)
5
Section 6: Public Meetings
All meetings of the LCB and its committees are open to the public, and all activities of the LCB
are subject to the “Sunshine Laws” also known as the Florida Government in the Sunshine
regulations, Chapter 286, Florida Statutes.
ARTICLE VI: STAFF
Section 1: General
The MPO shall provide the LCB with sufficient staff support and resources to enable the LCB to
fulfill its responsibilities as set forth in Chapter 427.0157, Florida Statutes. These
responsibilities include providing sufficient staff to manage and oversee the operations of the
LCB and assist in the scheduling of meetings, preparing meeting agenda packets, and other
necessary administrative duties as required by the LCB within the limits of the resources
available.
ARTICLE VII: LCB DUTIES
Section 1: LCB Duties
The LCB shall perform the following duties as specified in Rule 41-2, F.A.C.
1. Maintain official meeting minutes, including an attendance roster, reflecting
official actions and provide a copy of same to the Commission for the
Transportation Disadvantaged (TD Commission), and the Chairperson of the
Collier MPO.
2. Review and approve the Memorandum of Agreement between the Florida TD
Commission and the Collier County CTC and the Transportation Disadvantaged
Service Plan (TDSP). The LCB shall ensure that the TDSP has been developed by
involving all appropriate parties in the process.
3. On a continuing basis, monitor services provided under the approved service plan.
When requested, assist the CTC in establishing eligibility guidelines and trip
priorities.
4. Annually, provide the Collier MPO with an evaluation of the CTC's performance
in general and relative to Insurance, Safety Requirements and TD Commission
standards as referenced in Rule 41-2.006 F.A.C., and the performance results of
the most recent TDSP (41-2.012(5)(b) F.A.C.). As part of the CTC’s
performance, the LCB shall also set an annual percentage goal increase (or
establish a percentage) for the number of trips provided within the system to be on
public transit. The LCB shall utilize the Commission’s Quality Assurance
Performance Evaluation Tool to evaluate the performance of the CTC. This
evaluation tool and summary will be submitted to the Commission upon approval
4.G.1
Packet Pg. 236 Attachment: Strikethrough/Underline version of Bylaws (12570 : Annual Review and Adoption of the Updated Local Coordinating Board)
6
by the LCB.
5. In cooperation with the Coordinator CTC, review and provide recommendations
to the TD Commission on all applications for local, state, or federal funds relating
to transportation of the transportation disadvantaged in the county to ensure that
any expenditures within the county are provided in the most cost effective and
efficient manner. The LCB shall develop and implement a process by which the
LCB and CTC have an opportunity to become aware of any federal, state, or local
government funding requests and provide recommendations regarding the
expenditure of such funds.
6. Review coordination strategies for service provision to the transportation
disadvantaged in the designated service area to seek innovative ways to improve
cost effectiveness, efficiency, safety, working hours and types of service in an
effort to increase ridership to a broader population. Such strategies should also
encourage multi-county and regional transportation service agreements between
area CTCs and consolidation of adjacent counties when it is appropriate and cost
effective to do so and seek the involvement of the private and public sector,
volunteers, public transit, school districts, elected officials and any others in any
plan for improved service delivery.
7. Appoint a Grievance committee to serve as a mediator to process, investigate,
resolve complaints from agencies, users, potential users of the system and the
CTC in the designated service area, and make recommendations to the LCB for
improvement of service. The LCB shall establish procedures to provide regular
opportunities for issues to be brought before such committee and to address them
in a timely manner in accordance with the Commission’s Local Grievance
Guidelines. Members appointed to the committee shall be voting members of the
LCB.
8. In coordinating with the CTC, jointly develop applications for funds that may
become available.
9. Review and recommend approval of the Transportation Development Service
Plan for consistency with approved minimum guidelines and the goals and
objectives of the Board. The Transportation Development Service Plan shall
include a vehicle inventory of those vehicles purchased with transportation-
disadvantaged funds.
10. Evaluate multi-county or regional transportation opportunities (Fla. Stat. §
427.0157(6), as amended).
11. Annually hold a public hearing for the purpose of receiving input on unmet
transportation needs or any other areas that relate to the local transportation
services.
12. Work cooperatively with regional workforce boards established in chapter 445 to
provide assistance in the development of innovative transportation services for
Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.47", First line: 0.5"
4.G.1
Packet Pg. 237 Attachment: Strikethrough/Underline version of Bylaws (12570 : Annual Review and Adoption of the Updated Local Coordinating Board)
7
participants in the welfare transition program (Fla. Stat. § 427.0157(7), as
amended).
ARTICLE VIII: SUBCOMMITTEES
Section 1: Subcommittees
Upon a majority vote of a quorum of the LCB, subcommittees shall be designated by the Chair
as necessary to investigate and report on specific subject areas of interest to the LCB and to deal
with administrative and legislative procedures.
ARTICLE IX: COMMUNICATION WITH OTHER AGENCIES AND ENTITIES
Section 1: General
The Collier MPO authorizes the LCB to communicate directly with other agencies and entities as
necessary to carry out its duties and responsibilities in accordance with Rule 41-2 F.A.C.
ARTICLE X: CERTIFICATION
The undersigned hereby certifies that he/she is the Chairperson of the Collier County
Transportation Disadvantaged Local Coordinating Board and that the foregoing is a full, true and
correct copy of the By-laws of this LCB as endorsed on March 13 4, 202019 by the Collier
County Transportation Disadvantaged Local Coordinating Board and subsequently adopted by
the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization on JuneApril 12, 202019.
____________________________________
Donna Fiala, LCB Chairperson
4.G.1
Packet Pg. 238 Attachment: Strikethrough/Underline version of Bylaws (12570 : Annual Review and Adoption of the Updated Local Coordinating Board)
8
METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION
By: __________________________________________
Elaine Middelstaedt, MPO Chairperson
Attested By: __________________________________________
Anne McLaughlin, MPO Executive Director
Approved as to form and legality:
COLLIER COUNTY ATTORNEY
By: __________________________________________
Scott R. Teach, Deputy County Attorney
4.G.1
Packet Pg. 239 Attachment: Strikethrough/Underline version of Bylaws (12570 : Annual Review and Adoption of the Updated Local Coordinating Board)
4.G.2
Packet Pg. 240 Attachment: Bylaws with changes accepted (12570 : Annual Review and Adoption of the Updated Local Coordinating Board)
4.G.2
Packet Pg. 241 Attachment: Bylaws with changes accepted (12570 : Annual Review and Adoption of the Updated Local Coordinating Board)
4.G.2
Packet Pg. 242 Attachment: Bylaws with changes accepted (12570 : Annual Review and Adoption of the Updated Local Coordinating Board)
4.G.2
Packet Pg. 243 Attachment: Bylaws with changes accepted (12570 : Annual Review and Adoption of the Updated Local Coordinating Board)
4.G.2
Packet Pg. 244 Attachment: Bylaws with changes accepted (12570 : Annual Review and Adoption of the Updated Local Coordinating Board)
4.G.2
Packet Pg. 245 Attachment: Bylaws with changes accepted (12570 : Annual Review and Adoption of the Updated Local Coordinating Board)
4.G.2
Packet Pg. 246 Attachment: Bylaws with changes accepted (12570 : Annual Review and Adoption of the Updated Local Coordinating Board)
4.G.2
Packet Pg. 247 Attachment: Bylaws with changes accepted (12570 : Annual Review and Adoption of the Updated Local Coordinating Board)
4.G.2
Packet Pg. 248 Attachment: Bylaws with changes accepted (12570 : Annual Review and Adoption of the Updated Local Coordinating Board)
4.G.2
Packet Pg. 249 Attachment: Bylaws with changes accepted (12570 : Annual Review and Adoption of the Updated Local Coordinating Board)
4.G.2
Packet Pg. 250 Attachment: Bylaws with changes accepted (12570 : Annual Review and Adoption of the Updated Local Coordinating Board)
06/12/2020
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update
OBJECTIVE: For the MPO Board to ratify the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP)
Minor Update.
CONSIDERATIONS: Every year, Collier County is required to submit a minor update to the TDSP to
the Florida Commission for the Transportation Disadvantaged (CTD). The TDSP is a multi-year
document that looks at development, service and quality assurance components related to the delivery of
the Transportation Disadvantaged Program. The 2020 minor update to the TDSP was prepared by MPO
Staff and is shown in Attachment 1. The document must be submitted to the CTD prior to July 1st.
In accordance with the MPO’s Public Participation Plan, the document was advertised for a 14-day public
comment period that expired on June 3rd. The Local Coordinating Board (LCB) reviewed and approved
the TDSP Minor Update on June 3, 2020. The MPO Board is asked to ratify the 2020 TDSP Minor
Update, which will then be submitted to the CTD before the July 1st due date.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: The Local Coordinating Board (LCB) for the Transportation
Disadvantaged reviewed and approved the 2020 TDSP Minor Update at its June 3, 2020 meeting.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the Board ratify the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service
Plan (TDSP) Minor Update.
Prepared By: Josephine Medina, Senior Planner
ATTACHMENT(S)
1. TDSP 2020 Minor Update (PDF)
4.H
Packet Pg. 251
06/12/2020
COLLIER COUNTY
Metropolitan Planning Organization
Item Number: 4.H
Doc ID: 12571
Item Summary: Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP)
Minor Update
Meeting Date: 06/12/2020
Prepared by:
Title: – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Karen Intriago
06/04/2020 7:38 AM
Submitted by:
Title: Executive Director - MPO – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Anne McLaughlin
06/04/2020 7:38 AM
Approved By:
Review:
Metropolitan Planning Organization Brandy Otero MPO Analyst Review Completed 06/04/2020 8:55 AM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin MPO Executive Director Review Completed 06/04/2020 9:07 AM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin Meeting Pending 06/12/2020 9:00 AM
4.H
Packet Pg. 252
TRANSPORTATION DISADVANTAGED
SERVICE PLAN
ANNUAL UPDATE FY 2020/21- FY 2022/23
ADOPTED
June 03, 2020
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 253 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
iii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TDSP CERTIFICATION ........................................................................................................... IV
LCB ROLL CALL VOTE........................................................................................................... V
SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................... 1
SECTION 2 MANDATORY TDSP REQUIREMENTS.......................................................... 3
1. PREVIOUS TDSP REVIEW LETTER ......................................................................................................................... 3
2. NEEDS ASSESSMENT.............................................................................................................................................. 3
3. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND STRATEGIES .................................................................................................................. 5
4. IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE.............................................................................................................................. 12
SECTION 3 SERVICE PLAN UPDATE ................................................................................ 22
SECTION 4 UPDATED TABLES AND STATISTICS .......................................................... 32
SECTION 5 CONCLUSIONS .................................................................................................. 39
APPENDIX A 2020 CTC EVALUATION JULY 2018-JUNE 2019 ...................................... 40
APPENDIX B PTNE RESPONSE TO 2020 CTC EVALUATION ...................................... 139
APPENDIX C CTD RATE MODEL WORKSHEET ........................................................... 147
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE 1 IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE FY 2018-2019 STATUS UPDATE 13
TABLE 2 IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE 15
TABLE 3: CTD CALCULATED RATES – FY 2020/2021 CTD RATE MODEL 18
TABLE 4 CURRENT ADOPTED COLLIER AREA PARATRANSIT FARE STRUCTURES 19
TABLE 5 CURRENT COLLIER COUNTY ADOPTED FARE STRUCTURE 20
TABLE 6 POPULATION AND POPULATION DENSITY 32
TABLE 7 POPULATION AGE DISTRIBUTION 33
TABLE 8 ANNUAL HOUSEHOLD INCOME DISTRIBUTION 33
TABLE 9 EMPLOYMENT CHARACTERISTICS FOR COLLIER COUNTY 34
TABLE 10 VEHICLE AVAILABILITY DISTRIBUTION 34
TABLE 11 TRAVEL TO WORK – COMMUTE TIMES 35
TABLE 12 MODE OF TRAVEL TO WORK DISTRIBUTION 35
TABLE 13 NAMES AND LOCATIONS OF LOCAL UNIVERSITIES 36
TABLE 14 EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT 37
TABLE 15 TD POPULATION FORECAST 38
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 254 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
iv
TDSP Certification
The Collier County Local Coordinating Board hereby certifies that an annual evaluation
of the Community Transportation Coordinator was conducted consistent with the policies
of the Commission for the Transportation Disadvantaged and that all recommendations
of that CTC Evaluation have been incorporated in this Service Plan.
We further certify that the rates contained herein have been thoroughly reviewed,
evaluated and approved. This Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan was reviewed
in its entirety and approved by the Board at an official meeting held on June 03, 2020.
___________________ _________________________________
Date Local Coordinating Board Chairperson
Approved by the Commission for the Transportation Disadvantaged:
___________________ __________________________________
Date David Darm, Executive Director of the
Commission for the Transportation
Disadvantaged
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 255 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
v
LCB ROLL CALL VOTE
for Approval of Collier County’s
Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan Update
June 03, 2020
Name Representing Yes No Absent
Commissioner Donna Fiala Chairwoman
Harold Kurzman Elderly
Birgitta Grasser Citizen Advocate /Non User
Dylan Vogel Citizen Advocate/User
Nichole Spencer Children at Risk
Cheryl Burnham Community Action (economically
disadvantaged)
John Kasten Public Education
Dale Hanson Florida Dept. of Transportation
Vacant Florida Dept. of Children and
Families
Norma Adorno Area Agency on Aging SWFL
Robert Richards Florida Dept. of Education -Division
of Vocational Rehabilitation Services
Signe Jacobson Agency for Health Care
Administration
Susan Corris Southwest Florida Regional
Workforce Development Board
Oscar Gomez Veteran Services
VACANT Local Medical Community
N/A Local Mass Transit
Sherry Brenner Citizens with Disabilities
VACANT Private Transportation Industry
Leah Watson Agency for Persons with Disabilities
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 256 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
5/18/2020
1
SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION
Chapter 427 of the Florida Statutes establishes the Florida Commission for the
Transportation Disadvantaged (CTD) and directs the CTD to “accomplish the coordination
of transportation services provided to the transportation disadvantaged.” In
accomplishing this purpose, the CTD approves a Community Transportation Coordinator
(CTC) for five years for each county of the state which is charged with arranging cost -
effective, efficient, unduplicated services within its respectful service area. The Collier
Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) is approved by the CTD, charged with creating
the Local Coordinating Board (LCB) and providing technical assistance to the LCB. The
LCB acts as an advisory board and such provides guidance, monitors, evaluates and
supports the transportation activities of the CTC.
The Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) is an annually updated tactical
plan developed by the CTC and the MPO under the guidance and approval of the LCB in
accordance with the requirements set out in Rule 4102, F.A.C. Chapter 427, F.S.,
requires each County to develop a Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP)
for the Transportation Disadvantaged program, with a Major Update every five years, at
a minimum. This 2020 Minor Update is outlined to meet the requirements established by
the State of Florida that require each county to develop a TDSP. The 1979 Florida
Legislature passed the Transportation Services Act, Chapter 427, Florida Statutes (F.S.),
which called for the coordination at the County level of all Federal and State expenditures
for the "transportation disadvantaged."
The CTD Guidelines for TDSP Amendments and Updates mandates that only the
following components of the Plan are updated annually:
1) Previous TDSP Review Letter
2) Needs Assessment
3) Goals, Objectives and Strategies
a) Ensure that objectives indicate an implementation date/accomplishment date.
b) Note deficiencies & corrective actions.
c) Note service improvements or expansions.
d) Section should be logical and mirror the format from the previous year.
4) Implementation Plan
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 257 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
5/18/2020
2
a) Transportation Disadvantaged Improvement Plan (TDIP) should cite progress,
setbacks, adherence to schedules.
b) Implementation schedule revisions as necessary.
5) Cost / Revenue Allocation and Rate Structure Justification
a) Review current and updated projected expenses, revenues and levels of
service and make adjustments accordingly. A new Service Rates Summary
page as well as Rate Model Worksheets must be submitted.
The CTD Guidelines for TDSP Amendments and Updates also provide an option for the
update of the following components of the Plan:
1) DEVELOPMENT PLAN
a) Organization Chart updated as necessary.
b) LCB certification page (members, agencies, alternates and term) to include any
changes as previously submitted in TDSP or updates.
c) Any significant changes to major trip generators/attractors that have
significantly altered service delivery.
2) SERVICE PLAN
a) Changes in types or hours of service
b) Significant changes in system policies (priorities, eligibility criteria, etc.)
c) New service innovations or cancellation of services
d) Changes in operators/coordination contractors
e) Changes in vehicle inventory
f) System Safety Program Plan (SSPP) certification if expired and renewed.
g) Include new acceptable alternatives
h) Changes in narrative for adoption of new service standards
i) Changes to the Grievance and Evaluation process
3) QUALITY ASSURANCE
The TDSP is used by the Community Transportation Coordinator (CTC) and the LCB to
maintain and/or improve transportation services for the transportation disadvantaged and
to serve as a framework for performance evaluation.
For the purposes of this minor update, the mandatory components will be updated. No
additional optional updates are included in this document.
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 258 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
5/18/2020
3
SECTION 2
MANDATORY TDSP REQUIREMENTS
As previously noted, CTD Guidelines for Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan
(TDSP) Amendments and Updates require certain elements be updated annually. This
section of the document will address those mandated components and provide applicable
updated information.
1. Previous TDSP Review Letter
The CTD Guidelines require that all items cited as deficient or inadequate and needing
follow-up as part of the prior TDSP Review should be addressed in the update. To date,
there were no TDSP reviews that indicate deficiencies.
2. Needs Assessment
The purpose of this section is to assess the transportation needs and demands for
individuals with disabilities, elderly, low income and high risk and at-risk children. This
section attempts to identify any gaps in transportation services that are needed in the
service area. The section also provides a quantitative transportation needs profile for the
applicable TD populations and indicates unmet need for transportation in the Collier
County service area.
The Collier County TD population is discussed in Section 4 (Updated Tables and
Statistics) of this document. According to the Bureau of Economic and Business
Research, the population of Collier County will increase by more than 15 percent between
2017 and 2025 from an estimated population of 357,470 to a project ed population of
413,700. As compared to the average of other Florida counties, Collier County also has
approximately 10 percent more residents ages 65 years and older (with a corresponding
rate of disabilities). These conditions are key indicators of transit/paratransit use, as are
automobile availability, income, traffic, urban growth and land use/site planning. All of
these factors contribute to the need for public transit in Collier County.
With the population increases and the demographic characterist ics of the current
population, the potential annual demand for transportation disadvantaged services are
estimated to increase by approximately 300,000 annual trips over the next five years
(from 3,471,799 in 2020 to 3,789,789 in 2025) as described in the TD population
forecasting section.
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 259 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
5/18/2020
4
Historically, public transportation funding in Collier County has remained relatively
constant and while there are no firm future commitments from its funding partners CAT
anticipates it will be able to maintain existing levels of service with only minor planning
and capital improvements possible.
Following input received from public, private, human service and nonprofit transportation
providers and general public stakeholders, projects that would directly benefit the
transportation disadvantaged have been identified as priorities if additional funding
becomes available are shown below. Additional details on estimated project costs and
associated initiatives are described in the implementation schedule section of this report.
1) Secure funds necessary for vehicle replacement and expansion
2) Enhance accessibility to bus stops to meet Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
requirements.
3) Construct bus shelters & amenities (bike rack, bench, trash can, etc.)
4) Extend Service Hours on existing routes
5) Reduce headways on select routes
6) Implement new Collier County Lee/Collier Inter-county Connection
The CTD recommends a tool developed for the CTD in 2015 that utilizes data from a
variety of the most currently available sources to predict demand into the future. Data
from the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey (ACS) and the Survey of
Income and Projection Participation (SIPP), The Bureau of Economic and Business
Research (BEBR) County Population Projections, and the National Household Travel
Survey and fixed route bus coverage are examples of data utilized. These sources are
helpful in capturing economic trends, population growth, and the changing in
demographic composition of the population such as aging baby boomers and associated
increases in disability. This tool was used for the development of TD population forecasts
in the 2018 TDSP Major Update adopted by the LCB on October 24, 2018. The data
prepared in the TDSP Major Update indicates that the Collier County forecast of TD
population in 2020 is 160,502. This includes all disabled, elderly and low-income persons
and children who are “high-risk” or “at-risk”. These population groups are further refined
to identify the “Critical Need TD” population. This population includes individuals who,
due to severe physical limitations or low incomes, are unable to transport themselves or
purchase transportation, and are dependent upon others to obtain access to health care,
employment, education, shopping, social activities, or other life sustaining activities. The
Critical Need TD Population for 2020 is forecasted to be 17,675.
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 260 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
5/18/2020
5
Barriers to Coordination
Similar to other agencies across the state and across the nation, limited resources (both
personnel and financial) pose significant challenges to transportation providers. In Collier
County, the large size and diversity of the County further exasperates these challe nges.
The lack of affordable housing in close proximity to employment opportunities and other
essential services results in Collier County results in the need for more geographically
dispersed and more costly public transportation services. Transportation providers must
strike a careful balance between implementing enhancements to core services which are
often more financially productive versus providing life sustaining services for the
transportation disadvantaged who often live in different political jurisdictions outside core
service areas.
A myriad of stakeholder organizations have a vested interest in ensuring the County’s
economic vitality of which mobility is a critical element, but these organizations may
sometimes have competing interests resulting in stiff competition for scarce resources
which have remained relatively constant in recent years. The transportation needs of the
agricultural industry, for example, are significantly different than hospitality industry needs
to ensure mobility for tourists, but also staff transportation needs, and the nee ds of social
service agencies, and agencies that serve persons with disabilities, are very different than
the service needs of those employed in education.
3. Goals, Objectives and Strategies
A review of the 2018 TDSP Major Update’s goals, objectives, and strategies was
conducted and no changes are recommended at this time. They are included in this
report for ease of reference and are as follows:
The mission of the Collier County Local Coordinating Board is:
To carry out a coordinated and comprehensive approach to planning,
developing, and providing transportation services that meet the needs of
transportation disadvantaged persons.
CAT’s mission is:
Collier Area Transit is committed to providing safe, accessible, and
courteous public transportation services to our customers.
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 261 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
5/18/2020
6
The mission of the newly rebranded CAT Connect (formerly known as Collier Area
Paratransit) is to:
Identify and safely meet the transportation needs of Collier County, through a
courteous, dependable, cost effective and environmentally sound team
commitment.
The following goals and objectives have been adopted to further the missions above.
GOAL 1: Implement a fully coordinated transportation system.
Objective 1.1
Maximize coordination with public, private, and human service agencies, and other
transportation operators.
Objective 1.2
Coordinate with other counties and FDOT to evaluate and implement mutually
beneficial transportation services such as expansion of cross-county connections.
Objective 1.3
Explore efforts to increase effective use of transportation services, including providing
alternative transportation sources and public education about those options.
Strategy 1.1.1
Continue coordination efforts with City and County departments to ensure inclusion of
transit supportive elements in development plans and affordable housing/economic
development initiatives.
Strategy 1.1.2
Coordinate with FDOT District One Commuter Services to complement CAT outreach
efforts to major employers and to identify service expansion needs and ridesharing
opportunities.
Strategy 1.1.3
Maintain ongoing communication with coordinated providers to assess needs and
maximize access to available funding sources.
Strategy 1.1.4
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 262 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
5/18/2020
7
Identify opportunities to educate and inform parents and school districts about the
availability of transportation services, particularly as it relates to the needs of at risk
students.
GOAL 2: Maximize effective transfers of individuals from paratransit to fixed route
services.
Objective 2.1
Coordinate with CAT’s fixed route section to encourage passengers to use both
systems when accessible.
Strategy 2.1.1
Continue to offer travel training programs targeting a minimum of three group
programs per year.
Strategy 2.1.2
Install a minimum of ten covered ADA compliant accessible bus shelters per year.
Strategy 2.1.3
Utilize available communication tools and techniques as appropriate to reinforce the
safety and security measures/features of the public transit system.
Strategy 2.1.4
Ensure the CAT Connect eligibility screening process evaluates potential fixed route
opportunities and educate passengers on available options as appropriate for the
individual’s travel needs.
Strategy 2.1.5
Ensure all staff involved in service delivery receive training on customer sensitivity and
etiquette techniques.
GOAL 3: Provide an efficient and effective coordinated transportation service.
Objective 3.1
Consistently provide on-time service.
Objective 3.2
Minimize customer service reservation/inquiry call hold times.
Objective 3.3
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 263 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
5/18/2020
8
Ensure contract provider’s services are well utilized, timely, effective and affordable.
Objective 3.4
Increase the number of passenger trips per vehicle hour.
Objective 3.5
Maintain or trend downward the cost per passenger trip.
Objective 3.6
Maintain or trend downward the cost per mile.
Objective 3.7
Adjust fixed route services to allow greater use by paratransit customers.
Strategy 3.1.1
Obtain a system to track call hold time.
Strategy 3.1.2
Continually measure and analyze performance standards, as a basis for evaluating
quality assurance to achieve desired standards.
Strategy 3.1.3
Annually review paratransit origin and destination data to determine if fixed routes
should be reviewed for service expansions or realignment to allow greater use by
current paratransit riders.
Strategy 3.1.4
Identify opportunities to coordinate with dialysis centers to schedule patient treatments
concurrently to allow for the provision of more efficient paratran sit group trips.
GOAL 4: Educate and market fixed route and paratransit services to current
riders, the general public, agency sponsored clients, visitors, and other potential
customers.
Objective 4.1
Maximize the accessibility of service information including alternative delivery formats
such as Braille, auditory enhanced and alternative languages.
Objective 4.2
Utilize the electronic dissemination of marketing and education materials, including,
but not limited to the internet, e-mails, listservs, websites, etc.
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 264 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
5/18/2020
9
Objective 4.3
Identify opportunities to participate in or sponsor community events to build awareness
of available public transportation services.
Objective 4.4
Ensure that all websites and other electronic media are compliant with Section 508 of
the Rehabilitation Act, as amended in 1998. Under Section 508 of the Rehabilitation
Act, 29 U.S.C. 794d, agencies must give persons with disabilities, employees and
members of the public access to information that is comparable to the access
available to others. This includes access to electronic and information technology
applications.
Strategy 4.1.1
Continue active involvement in outreach activities, which may include but are not
limited to: “Dump the Pump” Day, Mobility Week, the library system’s Mail-a-Book
promotion and local job fairs.
Strategy 4.1.2
Participate in Lighthouse for the Blind and Immokalee’s travel training programs and
other training opportunities identified by CAT.
Strategy 4.1.3
Provide a current “Rider’s Guide” to paratransit patrons covering ADA and TD
services. Produce the guide in alternative formats and alternative languages that may
be needed to comply with “safe harbor” provisions as identified in CAT’s next Title VI
update.
GOAL 5: Operate a safe transportation system.
Objective 5.1
Ensure that services are provided in a safe and secure manner in accordance with the
CTD and FDOT standards and recommendations.
Objective 5.2
Ensure consistency and compliance with Chapter 14-90, Florida Administrative Code.
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 265 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
5/18/2020
10
Objective 5.3
Ensure consistency and compliance with the 49 CFR Part 655, Federal Transit
Administration Prevention of Alcohol Misuse and Prohibited Drug use in Transit
Operations including the adopted Substance Abuse Policy and policy statements.
Objective 5.4
Ensure consistency and compliance to 49 CFR Part 40, Procedures for Transportation
Workplace Drug and Alcohol Testing Programs.
Objective 5.5
Ensure consistency and compliance of FTA covered contractors to 49 CFR Part 655,
Federal Transit Administration Prevention of Alcohol Misuse and Prohibited Drug Use
in Transit Operations.
Objective 5.6
Ensure consistency and compliance with any local drug and alcohol service
standards.
Objective 5.7
Ensure consistency and compliance with the annually updated System Safety
Program Plan and Security Program Plan.
Objective 5.8
Ensure consistency and compliance of an accident/incident procedure as part of the
bus system safety program.
Objective 5.9
Ensure that new bus stops are readily accessible to persons with disabilities and meet
ADA Accessibility Guidelines (ADAAG) compliance requirements.
Strategy 5.1.1
Continually review accident/incident data to identify trends that may need to be
addressed through training or procedural changes.
Strategy 5.1.2
Review and monitor Operator training program to ensure inclusion of consistent
boarding techniques for passengers.
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 266 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
5/18/2020
11
Strategy 5.1.3
Conduct periodic bus stop inventories to ensure accessibility and the availability of
sidewalks.
Strategy 5.1.4
Coordinate with FDOT and Collier County Transportation Planning to evaluate
potential bus stop improvements that can be made in conjunction with roadway
improvements.
GOAL 6: Provide quality transportation services.
Objective 6.1
Maintain the accountability of transportation service providers through the coordinator
Quarterly Reports.
Objective 6.2
Adjust or expand service fixed route services to allow greater use by current
paratransit riders.
Objective 6.3
Evaluate customer input to ensure high quality services are provided.
Strategy 6.1.1
Continuously review ridership trends and origin/destination data to determine
necessary service enhancements.
Strategy 6.1.2
Periodically conduct fixed route and paratransit customer surveys.
Strategy 6.1.3
Conduct immediate follow-up on any complaint or concern identified in customer
surveys or phone inquiries.
GOAL 7: Secure funding necessary to meet above stated goals.
Objective 7.1
Explore all potential funding sources to address capital and operating needs.
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 267 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
5/18/2020
12
Objective 7.2
Maximize efficiency of utilization of all current state, federal and local resources.
Objective 7.3
Coordinate with all public, quasi-public, and non-profit entities in order to maximize all
potential funding opportunities for public transportation services in Collier and Lee
Counties.
Objective 7.4
Identify and pursue opportunities for establishing and coordinating privately
sponsored public transportation services in meeting local transit needs.
Strategy 7.1.1
Acquire new and upgraded paratransit vehicles and equipment necessary to maintain
existing services and allow for expansion as needed.
Strategy 7.1.2
Coordinate with Commuter Services to build awareness of existing services and
identify potential new partnership opportunities with major employers.
4. Implementation Schedule
CTD Guidelines require that the three-year Transportation Disadvantaged Improvement
Plan (TDIP) should cite progress, setbacks, and adherence to schedules noted in the
prior year TDSP, including all necessary revisions to the Implementation schedule. Table
1 reflects the applicable updates/status of the elements in the implementation plan. Table
2 reflects the elements of the implementation plan for future years.
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 268 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
5/18/2020
13
Table 1
Implementation Schedule FY 2018-2019 Status Update
Major Strategies/Activities Responsible
Parties
Estimated Cost (If
Known)
Status Update/Comment
Maintain existing service CAT $11,059,543
(Capital and
Operating)
Ongoing, service has been maintained status quo.
Continue coordination efforts to ensure transit supportive
elements in development plans
CAT, Local Gov,
FDOT, Developers
CAT Staff
Resources
Ongoing
Coordinate with FDOT District 1 Commuter Services CAT, FDOT CAT Staff
Resources
Ongoing, CAT coordinates with commuter services regularly and
partners for events periodically.
Maintain ongoing communications with coordinated
providers to asses needs and maximize access to funding.
CAT, Coordinated
Providers
CAT Staff
Resources
Ongoing
Identify opportunities to inform schools/parents about
available CAT services
CAT CAT Staff
Resources
Ongoing, Marketing staff member provides informational
presentation on the services provided by CAT.
Conduct a minimum of three group travel training programs
per year
CAT CAT Staff
Resources
Ongoing, Travel Training have been conducted to provide the
public with information and know how on utilizing the fixed route
system.
Educate CAT Connect passengers about fixed route options as
appropriate
CAT CAT Staff
Resources
Events that have been conducted for Connect passengers also
include information on fixed route services.
Ensure staff involved in service delivery receive training on
sensitivity and etiquette
CAT, Contract
Providers
CAT Staff
Resources
Operators and Staff members regularly participate in ADA
sensitivity and customer service training.
Maintain or improve CAT Connect performance measures
from FY 2017 baseline:
•Cost per passenger trip $40.21
•Accidents per 100,000 vehicle miles 1.33
•On‐time performance 90%
•Vehicle miles between road calls 79,473
•Cost per mile $3.42
CAT, Contract
Providers
CAT Staff
Resources
•Cost per passenger trip $49.48
•Accidents per 100,000 vehicle miles 1.03
•On‐time performance 90%
•Vehicle miles between road calls 19,179
•Cost per mile $2.62
Review CAT Connect origin and destination data and adjust
fixed route accordingly
CAT CAT Staff
Resources
Ongoing
Identify opportunities to coordinate with dialysis centers for
potential scheduling efficiencies
CAT CAT Staff
Resources
Ongoing, communication with centers are conducted regularly to
review efficiencies.
Conduct outreach and participate in community partner
initiatives
CAT, Partner
Agencies
CAT Staff
Resources
CAT Regularly participates in community initiatives
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 269 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged
5/18/2020
14
Major Strategies/Activities Responsible Parties Estimated Cost (If
Known)
Status Update/Comment
Conduct travel training in cooperation with community
partners
CAT Partner
Agencies
CAT Staff
Resources
Ongoing
Review accident/incident data to identify trends that can be
addressed with additional training or procedural changes
CAT, Contracted
Providers
CAT Staff
Resources
Accidents and Incidents are reviewed monthly and evaluated for
trends.
Monitor operator training to ensure consistent boarding
techniques
CAT, Contracted
Providers
CAT Staff
Resources
County Staff participates in random training sessions to evaluate
the consistent message and techniques.
Conduct bus stop inventories to ensure accessibility CAT, Contracted
Providers
CAT Staff
Resources
Ongoing
Coordinate with FDOT/Collier County Transportation
Planning to evaluate potential bus stop improvements
CAT, FDOT, Collier
County
CAT Staff
Resources
Ongoing
Review ridership trends and O&D information to determine
potential service enhancements
CAT CAT Staff
Resources
Ongoing
Conduct periodic fixed route and paratransit surveys CAT CAT Staff
Resources
Ongoing
Conduct immediate follow up on customer complaints and
inquiries
CAT CAT Staff
Resources
Ongoing
Install a minimum of 10 ADA compliant bus shelters per year
and associated amenities
CAT, Funding
Partners
Included in status
quo budget
8 Bus stop improvements were completed in FY18. 2 Bus stop
improvements awaiting easements for completion.
Develop/Procure new phone system to enhance customer
service
CAT, Funding
Partners
Collier County is going through a county wide procurement to
enhance the phone system.
Acquire new vehicles and equipment to allow for
replacement and expansion as needed based on available
resources
CAT Ongoing
Unfunded Priorities
Enhance bus stop accessibility to meet ADA requirements CAT, Funding
Partners
$500,000
Enhance Fixed Route Services (frequency) on Routes 11, 12,
13,15, and 17
CAT, Funding
Partners
$2,034,230
(excludes capital)
Enhance fixed route services (span) to one additional trip
Mon‐Sun on existing routes
CAT, Funding
Partners
$780,000
Implement new fixed route (Collier/Lee Inter‐county) CAT, Funding
Partners
$370,000
(excludes capital)
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 270 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged
5/18/2020
15
Table 2
Implementation Schedule
Schedule Major Strategies/Activities Responsible Parties Estimated Cost (If Known)
Maintain Existing System
FY 2019-
2020
Maintain existing service CAT $11,895,058 (Capital and
Operating)
Ongoing Continue coordination efforts to ensure transit supportive elements in
development plans
CAT, Local Gov, FDOT,
Developers
CAT Staff Resources
Ongoing Coordinate with FDOT District 1 Commuter Services CAT, FDOT CAT Staff Resources
Ongoing Maintain ongoing communications with coordinated providers to asses
needs and maximize access to funding.
CAT, Coordinated
Providers
CAT Staff Resources
Ongoing Identify opportunities to inform schools/parents about available CAT
services
CAT CAT Staff Resources
Ongoing Conduct a minimum of three group travel training programs per year CAT CAT Staff Resources
Ongoing Educate CAT Connect passengers about fixed route options as appropriate CAT CAT Staff Resources
Ongoing Ensure staff involved in service delivery receive training on sensitivity
and etiquette
CAT, Contract Providers CAT Staff Resources
Ongoing Maintain or improve CAT Connect performance measures from prior FY CAT, Contract Providers CAT Staff Resources
Ongoing Review CAT Connect origin and destination data and adjust fixed route
accordingly
CAT CAT Staff Resources
Ongoing Identify opportunities to coordinate with dialysis centers for potential
scheduling efficiencies
CAT CAT Staff Resources
Ongoing Conduct outreach and participate in community partner initiatives CAT, Partner Agencies CAT Staff Resources
Ongoing Conduct travel training in cooperation with community partner CAT Partner Agencies CAT Staff Resources
Ongoing Review accident/incident data to identify trends that can be addressed
with additional training or procedural changes
CAT, Contracted Providers CAT Staff Resources
Ongoing Monitor operator training to ensure consistent boarding techniques CAT, Contracted Providers CAT Staff Resources
Ongoing Conduct bus stop inventories to ensure accessibility CAT, Contracted Providers CAT Staff Resources
Ongoing Coordinate with FDOT/Collier County Transportation Planning to
evaluate potential bus stop improvements
CAT, FDOT, Collier
County
CAT Staff Resources
Ongoing Review ridership trends and O&D information to determine potential
service enhancements
CAT CAT Staff Resources
Ongoing Conduct periodic fixed route and paratransit surveys CAT CAT Staff Resources
Ongoing Conduct immediate follow up on customer complaints and inquiries CAT CAT Staff Resources
Ongoing Install a minimum of 10 ADA compliant bus shelters per year and
associated amenities
CAT, Funding Partners Included in status quo budget
Ongoing Acquire new vehicles and equipment to allow for replacement and
expansion as needed based on available resources
CAT
Unfunded Priorities
Enhance bus stop accessibility to meet ADA requirements CAT, Funding Partners $500,000
Enhance Fixed Route Services (frequency) on Routes 11, 12, 13,15, and
17
CAT, Funding Partners $2,034,230 (excludes capital)
Enhance fixed route services (span) to one additional trip Mon‐Sun on
existing routes
CAT, Funding Partners $780,000
Implement new fixed route (Collier/Lee Inter‐county) CAT, Funding Partners $370,000 (excludes capital)
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 271 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
5/18/2020
16
Schedule Major Strategies/Activities Responsible Parties Estimated Cost (If Known)
Maintain Existing System
FY 2020-
2021
Maintain existing service CAT $10,865,454 (Capital and
Operating)
Ongoing Continue coordination efforts to ensure transit supportive elements in
development plans
CAT, Local Gov, FDOT,
Developers
CAT Staff Resources
Ongoing Coordinate with FDOT District 1 Commuter Services CAT, FDOT CAT Staff Resources
Ongoing Maintain ongoing communications with coordinated providers to asses
needs and maximize access to funding.
CAT, Coordinated
Providers
CAT Staff Resources
Ongoing Identify opportunities to inform schools/parents about available CAT
services
CAT CAT Staff Resources
Ongoing Conduct a minimum of three group travel training programs per year CAT CAT Staff Resources
Ongoing Educate CAT Connect passengers about fixed route options as appropriate CAT CAT Staff Resources
Ongoing Ensure staff involved in service delivery receive training on sensitivity and
etiquette
CAT, Contract
Providers
CAT Staff Resources
Ongoing Maintain or improve CAT Connect performance measures from prior FY CAT, Contract
Providers
CAT Staff Resources
Ongoing Review CAT Connect origin and destination data and adjust fixed route
accordingly
CAT CAT Staff Resources
Ongoing Identify opportunities to coordinate with dialysis centers for potential
scheduling efficiencies
CAT CAT Staff Resources
Ongoing Conduct outreach and participate in community partner initiatives CAT, Partner Agencies CAT Staff Resources
Ongoing Conduct travel training in cooperation with community partner CAT Partner Agencies CAT Staff Resources
Ongoing Review accident/incident data to identify trends that can be addressed
with additional training or procedural changes
CAT, Contracted
Providers
CAT Staff Resources
Ongoing Monitor operator training to ensure consistent boarding techniques CAT, Contracted
Providers
CAT Staff Resources
Ongoing Conduct bus stop inventories to ensure accessibility CAT, Contracted
Providers
CAT Staff Resources
Ongoing Coordinate with FDOT/Collier County Transportation Planning to evaluate
potential bus stop improvements
CAT, FDOT, Collier
County
CAT Staff Resources
Ongoing Review ridership trends and O&D information to determine potential
service enhancements
CAT CAT Staff Resources
Ongoing Conduct periodic fixed route and paratransit surveys CAT CAT Staff Resources
Ongoing Conduct immediate follow up on customer complaints and inquiries CAT CAT Staff Resources
Ongoing Install a minimum of 10 ADA compliant bus shelters per year and
associated amenities
CAT, Funding Partners Included in status quo
budget
Ongoing Acquire new vehicles and equipment to allow for replacement and
expansion as needed based on available resources
CAT
Unfunded Priorities
Enhance bus stop accessibility to meet ADA requirements CAT, Funding Partners $500,000
Enhance Fixed Route Services (frequency) on Routes 11, 12, 13,15, and 17 CAT, Funding Partners $2,034,230 (excludes capital)
Enhance fixed route services (span) to one additional trip Mon‐Sun on
existing routes
CAT, Funding Partners $780,000
Implement new fixed route (Collier/Lee Inter‐county) CAT, Funding Partners $370,000 (excludes capital)
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 272 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
5/18/2020
17
Schedule Major Strategies/Activities Responsible Parties Estimated Cost (If Known)
Maintain Existing System
FY 2022-
2023
Maintain existing service CAT $14,201,503 (Capital and
Operating)
Ongoing Continue coordination efforts to ensure transit supportive elements in
development plans
CAT, Local Gov, FDOT,
Developers
CAT Staff Resources
Ongoing Coordinate with FDOT District 1 Commuter Services CAT, FDOT CAT Staff Resources
Ongoing Maintain ongoing communications with coordinated providers to asses
needs and maximize access to funding.
CAT, Coordinated
Providers
CAT Staff Resources
Ongoing Identify opportunities to inform schools/parents about available CAT
services
CAT CAT Staff Resources
Ongoing Conduct a minimum of three group travel training programs per year CAT CAT Staff Resources
Ongoing Educate CAT Connect passengers about fixed route options as appropriate CAT CAT Staff Resources
Ongoing Ensure staff involved in service delivery receive training on sensitivity and
etiquette
CAT, Contract
Providers
CAT Staff Resources
Ongoing Maintain or improve CAT Connect performance measures from prior FY CAT, Contract
Providers
CAT Staff Resources
Ongoing Review CAT Connect origin and destination data and adjust fixed route
accordingly
CAT CAT Staff Resources
Ongoing Identify opportunities to coordinate with dialysis centers for potential
scheduling efficiencies
CAT CAT Staff Resources
Ongoing Conduct outreach and participate in community partner initiatives CAT, Partner Agencies CAT Staff Resources
Ongoing Conduct travel training in cooperation with community partner CAT Partner Agencies CAT Staff Resources
Ongoing Review accident/incident data to identify trends that can be addressed
with additional training or procedural changes
CAT, Contracted
Providers
CAT Staff Resources
Ongoing Monitor operator training to ensure consistent boarding techniques CAT, Contracted
Providers
CAT Staff Resources
Ongoing Conduct bus stop inventories to ensure accessibility CAT, Contracted
Providers
CAT Staff Resources
Ongoing Coordinate with FDOT/Collier County Transportation Planning to evaluate
potential bus stop improvements
CAT, FDOT, Collier
County
CAT Staff Resources
Ongoing Review ridership trends and O&D information to determine potential
service enhancements
CAT CAT Staff Resources
Ongoing Conduct periodic fixed route and paratransit surveys CAT CAT Staff Resources
Ongoing Conduct immediate follow up on customer complaints and inquiries CAT CAT Staff Resources
Ongoing Install a minimum of 10 ADA compliant bus shelters per year and
associated amenities
CAT, Funding Partners Included in status quo
budget
Ongoing Acquire new vehicles and equipment to allow for replacement and
expansion as needed based on available resources
CAT
Unfunded Priorities
Enhance bus stop accessibility to meet ADA requirements CAT, Funding Partners $500,000
Enhance Fixed Route Services (frequency) on Routes 11, 12, 13,15, and 17 CAT, Funding Partners $2,142,638 (excludes capital)
Enhance fixed route services (span) to one additional trip Mon‐Sun on
existing routes
CAT, Funding Partners $821,568
Implement new fixed route (Collier/Lee Inter‐county) CAT, Funding Partners $389,718 (excludes capital)
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 273 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
5/18/2020
18
2)COST / REVENUE ALLOCATION AND RATE STRUCTURE JUSTIFICATION
CTD Guidelines state that TDSP Updates/Amendments should include a complete
explanation for any rate changes or new service changes. The explanation should
include a discussion of the review process as well as detail of LCB involvement and
approval. A new summary rate sheet should be presented if there are any changes.
In March 2020, the Collier MPO’s Local Coordinating Board approved the service rates
shown in Table 3 below utilizing the Florida Commission for the Transportation
Disadvantaged 2019 Rate Calculation Worksheet. The Rate Calculation Model is a tool
utilized by the CTD to standardize the comparison and approval of rates paid to
coordinators throughout the State of Florida. The detailed Rate Model worksheets are
included in Appendix C.
3)COST REVENUE ALLOCATION
The rate structure is based on the type of trip (i.e. ambulatory, ambulatory group,
wheelchair, etc.) in the service area.
Table 3: CTD Calculated Rates – FY 2020/2021 CTD Rate Model
CTD Calculated Rates – FY 2020/2021 CTD Rate Model
Effective Date: 04/4/2020
Ambulatory Trip $36.24
Wheelchair Trip $62.13
Group Trip- Individual $25.87
Group Trip - Group $36.26
Bus Pass (daily-full fare) $3.00
Bus Pass (daily-reduced fare) $1.50
Bus Pass (15 day-full fare)$20.00
Bus Pass (15 day-reduced fare)$10.00
Bus Pass (monthly-full fare) $40.00
Bus Pass (monthly-reduced fare) $20.00
Marco Express (monthly-full fare) $70.00
Marco Express (monthly-reduced fare) $35.00
Sources: Service Rates, Commission for the Transportation Disadvantaged,
TD Rate Model, Adopted March 4, 2020, Public Transit and Neighborhood
Enhancement Department, 2020.
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 274 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
5/18/2020
19
During 2018, Collier County conducted an extensive fare structure evaluation to analyze
potential fixed route and paratransit fare changes, assess potential ridership and revenue
impacts, minimize adverse impacts to low income and minority persons and identify fare
policy recommendations. The fare study involved a public outreach campaign involving
rider intercept surveys, public workshops, and the involvement of the County’s Public
Transit Advisory Committee. Based on the input received, the majority (77%) of bus riders
would support a fare increase if revenue is used to improve service frequency and
availability or to access new locations. Fifty percent of ADA riders supported a $0.50 fare
increase and 56% of TD riders supported a fare increase of $0.25. At the June 12, 2018
Board of County Commissioner’s Meeting a resolution was adopted to implement the
following fare structure changes effective October 1, 2018. The effective date for student
discount programs is June 12, 2018. Table 4 below and Table 5, on the following page,
displays CAT’s current fare policy.
Table 4
Current Adopted Collier Area Paratransit Fare Structures
Fare Structure Approved by the BCC
effective 10/1/18
ADA fare – At or above Poverty Level $3.00/$1.00
ADA & TD fare - Under Poverty Level $1.00
TD fare - 101% to 150% of Poverty Level $3.00
TD fare - 151% or higher above poverty
level $4.00
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 275 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
5/18/2020
20
Table 5
Current Collier County Adopted Fare Structure
Resolution 2018-104 was adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on June 12,
2018, which modified the fixed route fares effective October 1, 2018.
Service Category Base Fare *Reduced Fare
CAT full-fare one-way ticket $2.00 $1.00
CAT Children 5 Years of Age and Younger Free Free
CAT Transfers Free Up to 90 Min. Free Up to 90 Min.
CAT Day Pass $3.00 $1.50
CAT Marco Express One-way Fare $3.00 $1.50
Smart Card Passes
15-Day Pass $20.00 $10.00
30-Day Pass $40.00 $20.00
Marco Express 30-Day Pass $70.00 $35.00
Smart Card Media Fees
Smart Card Replacement Without Registration $2.00 $2.00
Smart Card Registration $3.00 $3.00
Smart Card Replacement With Registration $1.00 $1.00
Discount Passes Cost
Summer Paw Pass (Valid June 1-August 31) for Students Age 17 and Under
(Cost includes Smart Card)
$30.00
30-Day Corporate Pass (300+ Employees)$29.75/Month
*Reduced fares are for members of Medicare, Disabled community, those 65 years and older and
children 17 and under; high school & college students and active/retired military personnel. ID
required. This fare would also apply to the subcontracted transportation provider with the Florida
Commission for the Transportation Disadvantaged that provides transportation services under the
non-emergency transportation Medicaid Contract for Collier County.
Promotional Fares
Events Occurrence Fare
Try Transit Day Annual as designated by the
Board
Free
Transit Anniversary As Designated by the PTNE
Director
Free
Special Events Up to 5 events annually (Staff
may distribute fare media up
to specified value)
$200/Event
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 276 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
5/18/2020
21
QUALITY ASSURANCE
In accordance with the CTD’s Guidelines the service standards established in the TDSP
were reviewed. The Medicaid Grievance Process was developed and is included here
by reference. Additionally, no changes were made to the Evaluation Process or the local
Grievance Process.
CTC EVALUATION PROCESS
An annual evaluation of the Collier County CTC was conducted by the LCB, for the period
of 07/01/2018 through 06/30/2019, based on the Standards, Goals, and Objectives
contained within the local TDSP and using the Evaluation Workbook of the CTD. A desk
audit was performed using the Evaluation Workbook of the CTD, conducted site visits,
surveys and paratransit rides during the winter season when there is a higher seasonal
population and more traffic. The full annual CTC evaluation is provided in Appendix A.
The Collier MPO conducted the process of recommending Collier County as the CTC in
2017. The Collier County Board of County Commissioners approved Resolution 2017 -
210 requesting that they be re-designated as the CTC for Collier County. The LCB voted
unanimously to recommend to the Collier MPO that the Collier County BCC be re -
designated and approved as the CTC at their December 6, 2017 meeting. The Collier
MPO Board deemed that it is in the best interest of public health, safety and welfare of
Collier County that the Collier County BCC be re-designated and approved as the CTC.
The MPO Board voted unanimously to approve Resolution 2017 -08, recommending that
the Collier County BCC be re-designated and approved as the CTC. The
recommendation was submitted to the CTD and was approved at their February 13 th
Board meeting.
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 277 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
5/18/2020
22
SECTION 3
SERVICE PLAN UPDATE
On June 03, 2020 the LCB adopted an update of the Collier County local grievance policy
as follows:
INTRODUCTION
The Florida Commission for the Transportation Disadvantaged (CTD) requires all local
systems to have written procedures for addressing/resolving complaints and grievances.
The Collier County Board of County Commissioners (BCC) is the Community
Transportation Coordinator for Collier County. The BCC has directed that the Collier
County Public Transit and Neighborhood Enhancement Division (PTNE) oversee Collier
Area Transit’s Transportation Disadvantaged Program.
This document serves as the formal complaint/grievance procedure for the transportation
disadvantaged program as specified by the Commission for the Transportation
Disadvantaged (CTD) pursuant to Chapter 427, Florida Statute and Rule 41 -2.012,
Florida Administrative Code, hereinafter referred to as the Grievance Process. The
following rules and procedures shall constitute the grievance process to be utilized in the
coordinated community transportation disadvantaged system for Collier County.
SECTION 2: DEFINITIONS
2.1 As used in these rules and procedures the following words and terms shall have the
meanings assigned therein. Additional program definitions can be found in Chapter 427,
Florida Statutes and Rule 41-2, Florida Administrative Code.
(a)Community Transportation Coordinator (CTC): A transportation entity recommended
by a Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO), or by the appropriate designated official
planning agency, as provided for in Section 427.015(1), Florida Statutes, and approved
by the CTD, to ensure that coordinated transport ation services are provided to serve the
transportation disadvantaged population in a designated service area. The current CTC
for the County is the Collier County Board of County Commissioners (BCC). The Collier
MPO serves as the Designated Official Planning Agency (DOPA) in Collier County.
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 278 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
5/18/2020
23
(b) Transportation Disadvantaged (TD) user: Those persons, who because of physical or
mental disability, income status, or age or who for other reasons are unable to transport
themselves or to purchase transportation and are, therefore, dependent on others to
obtain access to health care, employment, education, shopping, social activities, or other
life-sustaining activities, or children who are handicapped or high -risk or at-risk as defined
in Section 411.202, Florida Statutes.
(c) Agency: An official, officer, commission, authority, council, committee, department,
division, bureau, board, section, or any other unit or entity of the state or of a city, town,
municipality, county, or other local governing body or a private nonprofit entity providing
transportation services as all or part of its charter.
(d) Transportation Operator: One or more public, private for profit or private nonprofit
entities engaged by the CTC to provide service to TD persons pursuant to a
Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP).
(e) Service Complaint: Incidents that may occur on a daily basis and are reported to the
CTC involved with the daily operations and are resolved within the course of a reasonable
time period suitable to the complainant. Local service complaints are driven by the
inability of the CTC to meet local service standards established by the CTC and LCB. All
service complaints should be recorded and reported by the CTC to the LCB.
(f) Formal Grievance: A written complaint to document any concerns or an unresolved
service complaint regarding the administration of TD services by the CTC, DOPA, or LCB.
(g) Administrative Meeting of the Grievance Committee Process: Chapter 120, Florida
Statute.
(h) Ombudsman Program: A toll-free telephone number established and administered by
the CTD to enable persons to access information and/or file complaints/grievances
regarding transportation services provided under the coordinated effort of the CTC.
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 279 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
5/18/2020
24
SECTION 3: OBJECTIVES
3.1 The objective of the grievance process shall be to process, investigate, and make
recommendations, in a timely manner on formal written complaints/grievances that are
not resolved between individual agencies/entities and the customer. It is not the objective
of the grievance process to have “adjudicative” or “determinative” powers.
3.2 The CTC must provide the TD Program’s telephone number in all collateral materials
regarding the reporting of complaints.
3.3 All documents pertaining to the grievance process will be made available, upon
request, in a format accessible to persons with disabilities.
3.4 A written copy of the grievance procedure shall be available to anyone upon request.
3.5 Apart from this grievance process, aggrieved parties with proper standing may also
have recourse through the Chapter 120, Florida Statutes Administrative Hearing Process,
or the judicial court system.
SECTION 4: THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE – MEMBERSHIP
4.1 The Grievance Committee shall be composed of a minimum of three Members of the
LCB and shall be appointed by a majority vote by the LCB. The Chairperson, or in his/her
absence the Vice Chairperson, of the LCB reserves the right to make reappointments
should any conflict of interest arise.
4.2 The TD Program Administrator (MPO Staff) or designee shall be an advisory member
of the Grievance Committee.
SECTION 5: TERMS OF MEMBERS
5.1 A member of the Grievance Committee may be added or removed for cause by the
LCB Chairperson, or in his /her absence, the Vice Chairperson. Vacancies in the
membership of the Grievance Committee shall be filled in the same manner as the original
appointments.
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 280 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
5/18/2020
25
5.2 A minimum of three (3) Grievance Committee members shall be present for official
action. Meetings shall be held at such times as the Grievance Committee may determine
and/or as necessitated by formally filed grievances.
SECTION 6: GRIEVANCE PROCESS
6.1 Grievance procedures will be those as specified by the LCB, developed from
guidelines of the CTD, and approved by the LCB as set forth below. The grievance
procedures are for the purpose of fact-finding and not exercising adjudicative powers.
Therefore, it should be understood that these procedures are for the purpose of “hearing”,
“advising” and “making recommendations” on issues affecting the service delivery and
administration of the TD program in the service area.
6.2 Apart from the grievance procedures outlined below, aggrieved parties with proper
standing may also have recourse through the Chapter 120, Florida Statutes
Administrative Meeting of the Grievance Committee Process, the judicial court system,
and the CTD.
6.3 Service Complaints: All service complaints should be recorded and reported by the
CTC to the LCB. Service complaints may include but are not limited to:
• Late pick-up and/or late drop-off
• No-show by transportation operator
• No-show by client
• Client behavior
• Driver behavior
• Passenger discomfort
• Service denial (refused service to client without an explanation as to why, i.e. may not
qualify, lack of TD funds, etc.)
• Other, as deemed appropriate by the LCB
6.4 Formal Grievance: The customer, in their formal complaint, should demonstrate or
establish their concerns as clearly as possible. The formal grievance process shall be
open to addressing concerns by any person or agency including but not limited to: users,
potential users, the CTC, the DOPA, elect ed officials, and operators. Formal grievances
may include, but are not limited to:
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 281 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
5/18/2020
26
• Chronic or reoccurring or unresolved Service Complaints (Refer to description of
service complaints)
• Violations of specific laws governing the provision of TD services i.e., Chapter 427,
F.S., Rule 41-2 FAC and accompanying documents, Sunshine Law, ADA).
• Contract disputes (Agencies/Operators)
• Coordination disputes
• Bidding disputes
• Agency compliance
• Conflicts of interest
• Supplanting of funds
• Billing and/or accounting procedures
• Denial of service
• Suspension of service
• Unresolved safety issues
• Other, as deemed appropriate by the LCB
6.5 All formal grievances filed must be written and contain the following:
• Name and address of the complainant
• A statement of the grounds for the grievance and supplemented by supporting
documentation made in a clear and concise manner. This shall include a complete
description of efforts taken by the customer to resolve the complaint.
• An explanation of the relief desired by the customer.
If the customer does not supply the above information to substantiate the grievance, no
further action will be taken.
6.6 Step 1: The customer shall first contact the PTNE Division Director and the entity
with which they have the grievance. The PTNE Director will attempt to mediate and
resolve the grievance. The PTNE Director will render a decision in writing within 14 days.
The customer may also contact the CTD Ombudsman representative through the
established Helpline at 1-800-983-2435 or by mail to: Florida Commission for the
Transportation Disadvantaged, 605 Suwannee Street MS -49, Tallahassee, FL 32399-
0450 or by email at www.dot.state.fl.us/ctd.
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 282 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
5/18/2020
27
Public Transit and Neighborhood Enhancement Director
8300 Radio Road
Naples, FL 34104
Phone: 239-252-5840
Email: AltTransModes@colliergov.net
6.7 Step Two: If the PTNE Director is unsuccessful at resolving the grievance through
the process above, the customer may request, in writing, that their grievance be heard by
the Grievance Committee. This request shall be made within ten (10) working days of
receipt of the report received from the PTNE Director. The request shall be sent to the
Collier MPO TD Program Administrator at:
Collier MPO
Attn: Josephine Medina, Senior Planner
2885 Horseshoe Drive South
Naples, FL 34104
(239) 252-5850
Josephine.Medina@colliercountyfl.gov
6.8 Step Three: Upon receipt of the written request for the grievance to be heard by the
Grievance Committee, the Collier MPO TD Program Administrator shall have fifteen (15)
working days to contact Grievance Committee members and set a meeting date and
location. The customer and all parties involved shall be notified of the meeting of the
Grievance Committee date and location at least ten (10) working days prior to the meeting
date by the method requested by the customer.
6.9 Step Four: Upon conclusion of the meeting, the Grievance Committee must submit
a written report of the Grievance Committee proceedings to the Chairperson, or the Vice
Chairperson in his/her absence, of the LCB within ten (10) working days. The report must
outline the grievance and the Grievance Committee’s findings/recommendations. If the
grievance is resolved through the meeting process, the grievance process will end. The
final report will be forwarded to the members of the LCB. The Local Coordinating Board
Grievance Committee must review all grievances and report accordingly to the full Local
Coordinating Board.
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 283 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
5/18/2020
28
If the grievance has not been resolved as outlined in these grievance procedures, the
customer may exercise their adjudicative rights, use the Administrative Hearing Process
outlined in Chapter 120, Florida Statutes, or request that their grievance be heard by the
CTD through the Ombudsman program established herein and the CTD’s Grievance
Process outlined in Section 7.
SECTION 7: CTD GRIEVANCE PROCESS
7.1 If the LCB Grievance Process does not resolve the grievance, the customer will be
informed of his/her right to file a formal grievance with the CTD. The customer may begin
this process by contacting the CTD through the established Helpline at 1 -800-983-2435
or by mail to: Florida Commission for the Transportation Disadvantaged, 605 Suwannee
Street MS-49, Tallahassee, FL 32399-0450 or by email at
CTDOmbudsman@dot.state.fl.us or www.dot.state.fl.us/ctd. Upon request of the
customer, the CTD will provide the customer with an accessible copy of the CTD’s
Grievance Procedures. If the CTD is unable to resolve the grievance, the customer will
be referred to the Office of Administrative Appeals or other legal venues appropriate to
the specific nature of the grievance. All of the steps outlined in Section 6 and Section 7(1)
and (2) must be attempted in the listed order before a grievance will move to the next
step. The customer should be sure to try and have as many details as possible, when
filing a complaint, such as date, times, names, vehicle numbers, etc. There is an
Ombudsman Program, provided by the CTD, which is available to anyone who requests
assistance in resolving complaints/grievances. The Ombudsman Program may be
reached through the toll free Helpline at 1 -800-983-2435 or by email at
CTDOmbudsman@dot.state.fl.us or www.dot.state.fl.us/ctd. By requesting assistance of
the Ombudsman Program in resolving complaints, the complaint will still follow, in order,
all of the established steps listed in Sections 6 and 7 above. The Ombudsman will
document each complaint and upon the request of the customer, file the complaint with
the local CTC on the customer’s behalf, to begin the local complaint process. If the
customer has already filed the grievance locally and remains unsatisfied, the
Ombudsman will assist the customer with the next step in the complaint or grievance
process. The customer has the right to file a formal grievance with the Office of
Administrative Appeals or other venues appropriate to the specific nature of the
complaint.
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 284 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
5/18/2020
29
Service Standards
In order to assess quality assurance for the delivery of transportation services, it is
necessary to have established service standards and policies. The Commission for the
Transportation Disadvantaged and FTA have several requirements of its transportati on
providers, which forms basis for the following standards and policies. These service
standards and policies are the basis for the annual review of the Community
Transportation Coordinator by the Local Coordinating Board.
The Program provided to users of the system will be based on the following eligibility
criteria.
Eligibility
Individuals who are interested in using the CAP services must apply through a written
application process. The eligibility process can take up to twenty -one (21) calendar days
to complete. A functional assessment/interview may be required as part of the el igibility
process. After qualifying for service, all approved individuals are subject to recertification
every three years or if there is a change in address or health condition, whichever is
sooner. To receive an application please visit our website at www.colliertransit.com, visit
or call the center. CAP is intended to serve a limited group of people, specifically those
who have no other means of transportation and qualify under the following sponsored
programs:
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA): Individuals whose physical or mental
impairment prevent use of the CAT bus service (fixed route). In addition, the individual’s
origin and destination must be within the ADA corridor, which is defined as a service
corridor that extends three-quarters (¾) of a mile on either side of CAT bus service (fixed
route).
Visitors who are unable to utilize CAT bus service (fixed route) may be eligible to utilize
paratransit services. Visitors will be required to provide proof of their visitor status, proof
of their disability if it is not apparent, and certify that they are unable to use fixed route
service. For more information please contact our Customer Service Department at 239 -
252-7272. For service beyond the 21 days, an application will be required.
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 285 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
5/18/2020
30
Transportation Disadvantaged (TD): Individuals who because of a mental or physical
disability, income status, or age are unable to transport themselves or to purchase
transportation and are, therefore, dependent upon others to obtain access to healthcare,
employment, education, shopping, social activities, or other life -sustaining activities, or
children who are handicapped, or high risk or at risk (as defined in § 411.202). In addition,
the individual’s trip origin and/or destination must reside outside the ADA corridor.
Agencies: Individuals whose trips are funded under a negotiated agency contract.
The standards listed below are those that are required by Section 41 -2.006, Florida
Administrative Code and the Code of Federal Regulation.
Pick-Up Window
To accommodate increased trip demand with limited resources the CTC’s trip scheduling
process was modified. The intent of this change was to more efficiently accommodate
service demand while at the same time improve the reliability of the service. Historically,
trips had been scheduled depending on the area rider was located regardless of the trip
distance. The LCB in their regular December 4, 2020 meeting approved a new trip
scheduling procedure that is more mileage based, as described below.
Passengers are offered “negotiated times” or options of pick up times based on vehicle
availability, the distance of the trip, and passengers requested pick-up or drop-off time.
These scheduling windows are dependent on the trip length of the pick -up and drop-off
points. Trips lengths that are less than 9 miles will have a 60-minute scheduling window.
Trips lengths that are between 9 miles to 18 miles will have a 75 -minute scheduling
window and trip lengths of over 18 miles will have a scheduling window of up to 120 -
minutes. Once the passenger accepts one of the “negotiated times” this will serve as an
estimated arrival time with a 30-minute window. Medical appointments and employment
must follow the “30 minutes early to zero minutes late” policy. Four (4) or more
passengers dropped off and/or picked‐up at the same location constitute a group trip. The
CTC may negotiate special arrangements with the customer or agency, in advance, for a
group trip. These special arrangements will be documented and evaluated separately for
on‐time performance. Every effort will be made by the CTC to keep the ride times within
the service window for these trips.
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 286 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
5/18/2020
31
All return trips are also scheduled in advance. The pick-up process for return trips is the
same as the originating trip.
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 287 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
5/18/2020
32
SECTION 4
UPDATED TABLES AND STATISTICS
A number of the tables in the TDSP have been updated in an effort to evaluate the system
progress. A summary of the findings is provided when there is a significant change in the
activity.
SERVICE AREA PROFILES AND DEMOGRAPHICS
An Overview of Collier County
Collier County is located on the west coast of Florida. It is bordered by Broward and Dade
Counties to the east, Lee and Hendry Counties to the north and Monroe County to the
south. As measured by land area, Collier County is the largest County in Florida and the
fourth largest by total area. Naples, Everglades City and Marco Island are the County’s
three incorporated areas.
Collier County Demographics
Table 6 below shows population estimates, growth, and density for Collier County as
compared to the State of Florida. Between 2010 and 2018, Collier County’s population
growth was estimated to be 13.19 percent, which was approximately 3.63 percent higher
as compared to Florida growth.
Table 6
Population and Population Density
Area Population
(2010)
Population
(2018 ACS 5-year
estimate)
Population Growth
(2010-18)
Land Area
(Sq. Miles)
Density
(2018)
(persons per
square mile)
Collier
County
321,520 363,922
378,488
13.19%
17.72%
2,026
square miles
180
Florida 18,801,310 20,598,139
21,299,325
9.56%
13.29%
53,625 384
Source: US Census Bureau, 2010 Population Data
U.S Census Bureau, 2014-2018 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
U.S. Census Bureau, Census of Population and Housing. Land area is based on current information in the TIGER®
database, calculated for use with Census 2010.
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 288 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
5/18/2020
33
Population Age Characteristics
With one exception, the population age distribution in Collier County is somewhat similar
to the State of Florida. The population ages 65 years and older is over 1 1 percent higher
than the same age group statewide. In each of the other age group categories , the
difference between the County and the State is no more than 4.7 percent as shown in
Table 7.
Table 7
Population Age Distribution
Percentages of Age Cohorts (in Years)
Area 0-19 20-34 35-54 55-64 65 +
Collier County 19.6% 14.5% 21.8% 13.5% 30.9%
Florida 22.5% 19.2% 25.5% 13.2% 19.7%
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2014-2018 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
Income Characteristics
Table 8 displays the annual household income distribution for Collier County as compared
to Florida in 2018. The most significant difference in household income distribution is in
the income category of households earning $75,000 or more per year. The percentage of
households in the highest income category is approximately 9.6 percent higher than the
State of Florida. Households earning $50,000 to $74,999 is also slightly higher than the
statewide average. All other income categories fall below the state average .
Table 8
Annual Household Income Distribution
Annual Household Income
Collier
County $0 - $9,999 $10,000 - $24,999 $25,000 - $34,999 $35,000 - $49,999 $50,000 - $74,999 $75,000+
Percent 4.1% 11.1% 9.1% 12.8% 18.5% 44.2%
Florida $0 - $9,999 $10,000 - $24,999 $25,000 - $34,999 $35,000 - $49,999 $50,000 - $74,999 $75,000+
Percent 6.8% 15.2% 10.7% 14.3% 18.4% 34.6%
*Population included is 16 years or older.
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2014-2018 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 289 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
5/18/2020
34
Employment Characteristics
At 3.0 percent, the 2020 unemployment rate in Collier County is slightly higher than the
unemployment rate across the State of Florida (2.8%) as shown in Table 9. This more
than 50 percent lower than in 2013, when the unemployment rates were 7.5 percent and
8.0 percent, respectively.
Table 9
Employment Characteristics for Collier County
Area Percentage of Labor Force Unemployed
Collier 3.0%
Florida 2.8%
Source: Bureau of Labor and Employment Statistics, US Department of Labor, Employment
Figures for January 2020, Released March 2020.
.
Vehicle Availability
According to the Census Bureau’s 5-year estimates, 5.2 percent of households in Collier
County do not own vehicles while 94.8 percent have one or more vehicles available in the
household. This is lower than statewide average vehicle ownership of 97.1 percent with
only 2.9% of households statewide not having access to a vehicle. See Table 10.
Table 10
Vehicle Availability Distribution
Household Vehicle Availability
Area None (Percent of Total) One or More (Percent of Total)
Percent of Total
Collier 5.2% 94.8%
Florida 2.9%
97.1%
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2014-2018 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 290 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
5/18/2020
35
Travel to Work
Table 11 compares the distribution of travel time to work for Collier County and Florida.
Overall, Collier County commuters travel a shorter time to work than the average for
Florida commuters. Approximately 65.9 percent of the County’s commuters travel less
than 30 minutes to work as compared to the state estimates of 5 8.2 percent. Only 11.7
percent have commutes in excess of 45 minutes as compared to 17.2 percent across
Florida as shown in Table 11.
Table 11
Travel to Work – Commute Times
Area Less than
10 min 10-19 min 20-29 min 30-44 min 45-59 min 60 + min
Collier 11.6% 30.5% 23.8% 22.5% 6.4% 5.3%
Florida 8.9% 26.6% 22.7% 24.4% 9.1% 8.1%
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2014-2018 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
Mode of Travel to Work
Table 12 displays the travel mode utilized by Collier County commuters. As compared to
the State of Florida, there are fewer (74.4% versus 79.4%) commuters who drive alone
to work, more who carpool or vanpool to work, slightly more (2.2% versus 1.9%) who
utilize public transportation for work trips and nearly a little less than 2% more who work
at home.
Table 12
Mode of Travel to Work Distribution
Area Drive
Alone
Carpool or
Vanpool
Public
Transportation Walk Bicycle Other
Means
Work at
Home
Collier (%) 74.4% 12.1% 2.2% 1.4% 1.0% 1.5% 7.4%
Florida (%) 79.4% 9.2% 1.9% 1.4% 0.6% 1.6% 5.8%
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2014-2018 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 291 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
5/18/2020
36
Housing Classifications and Patterns
A large portion of Collier County consists of protected land so housing is generally
concentrated in the western portion of the County. Due to the desirability of coastal
property, land values and high housing costs pose a challenge to area employers who
report difficulty hiring and retaining employees due to a lack of affordable housing in the
area. A 2017 study by the Urban Land Institute reported that two out of five households
in Collier County are cost burdened (pay more than 30% of income toward housing) and
one out of five are severely cost burdened (pay more than 50% of income toward
housing). This impacts significant number the County’s employees including those in
public safety, health care, education, service workers and entry/mid ‐level professionals.
Also, of significant concern are residents who are low to moderate income seniors, and
very low income (transportation disadvantaged) residents, many of whom are particularly
reliant on public transportation for access to health care and other life sustaining activities.
Educational Profiles
A number of colleges and universities are located within Collier County and in neighboring
communities and are listed in Table 13.
Table 13
Names and Locations of Local Universities
Institution Name Location
Ave Maria University Ave Maria
Barry University Ft. Myers
Florida Gulf Coast University Ft. Myers
Florida SouthWestern State College Naples/Ft. Myers
Hodges University Naples
Nova Southeastern University Bonita Springs
In addition to these colleges and universities, the County is also home to a number of
technical institutes and training programs. Adult and workforce education is provided
through Collier County Public Schools and includes the secondary technical training
schools of Lorenzo Walker Institute of Technology (LWIT) and Bethune Education Center
(BEC). In addition, Immokalee Technical Institute (iTECH) is a technical training center
focusing on technical education programs for high school students and adults. The center
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 292 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
5/18/2020
37
also offers Adult Basic Education (ABE), General Education Development (GED), and
adult literacy programs.
Table 14 below displays the educational attainment of Collier County residents. The
percentage of Collier residents that have less than a 9th grade education is a little less
than compared to the state average, and approximately 3.3 percent more Collier residents
have a bachelors, graduate or professional degree when compared to the state average.
Table 14
Educational Attainment
TD Population Forecasts
The Paratransit Service Demand Estimation Tool serves as an aid in the development of
TD population and travel demand estimates. This tool was used in the 2018 TDSP Major
Update, adopted by the LCB on October 24, 2018. The tool defines two categories of TD
population in the State of Florida. The first category is the “General TD” population. This
includes all disabled, elderly and low-income persons and children who are “high-risk” or
“at-risk”. These population groups are further refined to identify the “Critical Need TD”
population. This population includes individuals who, due to severe physical limitations
or low incomes, are unable to transport themselves or purchase transportation, and are
dependent upon others to obtain access to health care, employment, education,
shopping, social activities, or other life sustaining activities. Table 15 displays the
population forecast for Collier County and the General TD Population versus the Critical
Need TD Population.
Collier County Florida
Less Than High School 10.7% 11.5%
High School or Equivalent 12.6% 14.6%
Some College or Associate’s
Degree 16.8% 17.4%
Bachelor’s Degree 23.5% 24.2%
Graduate or Professional School
Degree 36.3% 32.3%
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2014-2018 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates (Population
25 years and over)
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 293 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
5/18/2020
38
Table 15
TD Population Forecast
Critical Need TD
Population
Forecast
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
General TD
Population 154,150 155,714 157,294 158,890 160,502 162,131 163,776 165,437 167,116 168,812 170,524
Critical Need TD
Population 16,804 17,017 17,234 17,453 17,675 17,899 18,127 18,357 18,591 18,827 19,066
Source: TD Population Forecast is from the 2018 TDSP Major Update adopted on October 24, 2018. Uses Bureau of Economic and
Business Research population forecast and applies changes to the TD population and trip rate estimates to provide the potential
demand for critical need transportation in Collier County through 2026.
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 294 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
5/18/2020
39
SECTION 5
CONCLUSIONS
The large geographical size of the County in the terms of land area (2,026 square miles)
causes the TD population to be spread throughout the county, creating the potential for
longer trips. The large land area presents a challenge in meeting on time performance
and other local standards.
The CTC must ensure that the vendors are providing the required services in accordance
with the local developed standards in addition to those that are required by Section 41 -
2.006, Florida Administrative Code.
The paratransit system is an essential service that continues to provide mobility options
to the customers of Collier County. The CTC should continue to monit or vendor
operations and ensure that the vendors are providing the required services in accordance
with local developed standards in addition to those that are required by Section 41-2.006,
Florida Administrative Code. The CTC should continue to provide information to the Local
Coordinating Board regarding performance reports and summaries of customer surveys.
It is recommended that the CTC continue to monitor on time performance , review all
TDSP standards with the vendors, and provide the Local Coordinating Board information
of measures being implemented to increase on time performance for all TDSP standards.
Specific attention should be placed on the medical appointment and employment TDSP
“30 minutes early to zero minutes late” policy.
The conclusions and recommendations of this report are intended to improvement the
system as it continues to grow, mature and move forward.
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 295 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
APPENDIX A
2020 CTC Evaluation
July 2018-June 2019
40
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 296 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
CTC BEING REVIEWED:
COUNTY (IES):
ADDRESS:
CONTACT:PHONE:
REVIEW PERIOD: _______REVIEW DATES:
PERSON CONDUCTING THE REVIEW:
CONTACT INFORMATION:
FORMATTED 2011 – 2012
CTC
EVALUATION WORKBOOK
41
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 297 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
Page 5
EVALUATION INFORMATION
An LCB review will consist of, but is not limited to the following
pages:
1 Cover Page
5 - 6 Entrance Interview Questions
12 Chapter 427.0155 (3) Review the CTC monitoring of
contracted operators
13 Chapter 427.0155 (4) Review TDSP to determine utilization
of school buses and public transportation services
19 Insurance
23 Rule 41-2.011 (2) Evaluation of cost-effectiveness of
Coordination Contractors and Transportation Alternatives
25 - 29 Commission Standards and Local Standards
39 On-Site Observation
40 – 43 Surveys
44 Level of Cost - Worksheet 1
45-46 Level of Competition – Worksheet 2
47 - 48 Level of Coordination – Worksheet 3
Notes to remember:
The CTC should not conduct the evaluation or surveys. If the CTC is also the PA,
the PA should contract with an outside source to assist the LCB during the review
process.
Attach a copy of the Annual QA Self Certification.
42
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 298 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
Page 6
ENTRANCE INTERVIEW QUESTIONS
INTRODUCTION AND BRIEFING:
Describe the evaluation process (LCB evaluates the CTC and forwards a copy of the
evaluation to the CTD).
The LCB reviews the CTC once every year to evaluate the operations and the
performance of the local coordinator.
The LCB will be reviewing the following areas:
Chapter 427, Rules 41-2 and 14-90, CTD Standards, and Local Standards
Following up on the Status Report from last year and calls received from the
Ombudsman program.
Monitoring of contractors.
Surveying riders/beneficiaries, purchasers of service, and contractors
The LCB will issue a Review Report with the findings and recommendations to the CTC
no later than 30 working days after the review has concluded.
Once the CTC has received the Review Report, the CTC will submit a Status Report to
the LCB within 30 working days.
Give an update of Commission level activities (last meeting update and next meeting
date), if needed.
USING THE APR, COMPILE THIS INFORMATION:
1. OPERATING ENVIRONMENT:
RURAL URBAN
2. ORGANIZATION TYPE:
PRIVATE-FOR-PROFIT
PRIVATE NON-PROFIT
GOVERNMENT
TRANSPORTATION AGENCY
43
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 299 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
Page 7
3. NETWORK TYPE:
SOLE PROVIDER
PARTIAL BROKERAGE
COMPLETE BROKERAGE
4. NAME THE OPERATORS THAT YOUR COMPANY HAS CONTRACTS WITH:
5. NAME THE GROUPS THAT YOUR COMPANY HAS COORDINATION
CONTRACTS WITH:
Coordination Contract Agencies
Name of
Agency
Address City, State, Zip Telephone
Number
Contact
Good Wheels, Inc. 10075 Bavaria Rd Fort Myers, FL, 33913 (239) 768‐2900 Alan M. Mandel
Easter Seals
Florida, Inc.8793 Tamiami
Trl E Suite 111 Naples, FL, 34113 (239) 403‐0366 Susan Ventura
Sunrise Community
of S.W. Florida 4227 Exchange Avenue Naples, FL, 34104 (239) 643‐5338 Cassandra
Beaver
44
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 300 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
Page 8
6. NAME THE ORGANIZATIONS AND AGENCIES THAT PURCHASE SERVICE
FROM THE CTC AND THE PERCENTAGE OF TRIPS EACH REPRESENTS?
(Recent APR information may be used)
Name of Agency % of Trips Name of Contact Telephone Number
7. REVIEW AND DISCUSS TD HELPLINE CALLS:
Number of calls Closed Cases Unsolved Cases
Cost
Medicaid
Quality of Service
Service Availability
Toll Permit
Other
45
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 301 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
Page 13
COMPLIANCE WITH CHAPTER 427, F.S.
Review the CTC contracts for compliance with 427.0155(1), F.S.
“Execute uniform contracts for service using a standard contract, which
includes performance standards for operators.”
ARE YOUR CONTRACTS UNIFORM? Yes No
IS THE CTD’S STANDARD CONTRACT UTILIZED? Yes No
DO THE CONTRACTS INCLUDE PERFORMANCE STANDARDS FOR THE TRANSPORTATION
OPERATORS AND COORDINATION CONTRACTORS?
Yes No
DO THE CONTRACTS INCLUDE THE PROPER LANGUAGE CONCERNING PAYMENT TO
SUBCONTRACTORS? (Section 21.20: Payment to Subcontractors, T&E Grant, and FY)
Yes No
IS THE CTC IN COMPLIANCE WITH THIS SECTION? Yes No
Operator Name Exp. Date SSPP AOR Reporting Insurance
46
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 302 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
Page 14
COMPLIANCE WITH CHAPTER 427, F.S.
Review the CTC last AOR submittal for compliance with 427. 0155(2)
“Collect Annual Operating Data for submittal to the Commission.”
REPORTING TIMELINESS
Were the following items submitted on time?
a.Annual Operating Report Yes No
Any issues that need clarification? Yes No
Any problem areas on AOR that have been re-occurring?
List:
b. Memorandum of Agreement Yes No
c.Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan Yes No
d. Grant Applications to TD Trust Fund Yes No
e.All other grant application (____%)Yes No
IS THE CTC IN COMPLIANCE WITH THIS SECTION? Yes No
Comments:
47
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 303 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
Page 15
COMPLIANCE WITH CHAPTER 427, F.S.
Review the CTC monitoring of its transportation operator contracts to ensure
compliance with 427.0155(3), F.S.
“Review all transportation operator contracts annually.”
WHAT TYPE OF MONITORING DOES THE CTC PERFORM ON ITS OPERATOR(S) AND
HOW OFTEN IS IT CONDUCTED?
Is a written report issued to the operator? Yes No
If NO, how are the contractors notified of the results of the monitoring?
WHAT TYPE OF MONITORING DOES THE CTC PERFORM ON ITS COORDINATION
CONTRACTORS AND HOW OFTEN IS IT CONDUCTED?
Is a written report issued? Yes No
If NO, how are the contractors notified of the results of the monitoring?
WHAT ACTION IS TAKEN IF A CONTRACTOR RECEIVES AN UNFAVORABLE
REPORT?
IS THE CTC IN COMPLIANCE WITH THIS SECTION? Yes No
ASK TO SEE DOCUMENTATION OF MONITORING REPORTS.
PTNE monitors the operations contractor for compliance with FTA requirements and contract compliance in the following
ways: conduct bi-weekly operational meetings that include staff from Fleet Maintenance, CAT fixed route and paratransit
operations, and County staff. Agendas for those meetings include topics such as safety, maintenance, ADA, customer service,
operations, etc. to ensure operational efficiency. Reports are provided by the vendor as specified by the contract and reviewed
by the Public Transit Manager. These reports include accident/incidents, customer service, farebox validation, drug and
alcohol testing, ridership, performance measures and on-time performance. Internal Controls have been established to review
driver training and pre-trip inspections. Operator inspections are conducted periodically.
The coordination contractors are required to provide quarterly reports of the service being performed for
CTC monitoring.
If a vehicle purchased with 5310 grant funds is used to provide the service by the Coordination
contractor then vehicle records are provided to the CTC to ensure appropriate maintenance. Monthly
reports are provided to the CTC.
48
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 304 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
Page 16
COMPLIANCE WITH CHAPTER 427, F.S.
Review the TDSP to determine the utilization of school buses and public
transportation services [Chapter 427.0155(4)]
“Approve and coordinate the utilization of school bus and public transportation
services in accordance with the TDSP.”
HOW IS THE CTC USING SCHOOL BUSES IN THE COORDINATED SYSTEM?
Rule 41-2.012(5)(b): "As part of the Coordinator’s performance, the local
Coordinating Board shall also set an annual percentage goal increase for the
number of trips provided within the system for ridership on public transit, where
applicable. In areas where the public transit is not being utilized, the local
Coordinating Board shall set an annual percentage of the number of trips to be
provided on public transit."
HOW IS THE CTC USING PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION SERVICES IN THE COORDINATED
SYSTEM?
N/A
IS THERE A GOAL FOR TRANSFERRING PASSENGERS FROM PARATRANSIT TO TRANSIT?
Yes No
If YES, what is the goal?
Is the CTC accomplishing the goal? Yes No
IS THE CTC IN COMPLIANCE WITH THIS REQUIREMENT? Yes No
Comments:
49
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 305 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
Page 21
CHAPTER 427
Findings:
Recommendations:
50
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 306 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
Page 22
COMPLIANCE WITH 41-2, F.A.C.
Compliance with 41-2.006(1), Minimum Insurance Compliance
“...ensure compliance with the minimum liability insurance requirement of
$100,000 per person and $200,000 per incident…”
WHAT ARE THE MINIMUM LIABILITY INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS?
WHAT ARE THE MINIMUM LIABILITY INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS IN THE
OPERATOR AND COORDINATION CONTRACTS?
HOW MUCH DOES THE INSURANCE COST (per operator)?
Operator Insurance Cost
DOES THE MINIMUM LIABILITY INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS EXCEED $1 MILLION
PER INCIDENT?
Yes No
If yes, was this approved by the Commission? Yes No
IS THE CTC IN COMPLIANCE WITH THIS SECTION? Yes No
Comments:
51
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 307 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
Page 26
COMPLIANCE WITH 41-2, F.A.C.
Compliance with 41-2.011(2), Evaluating Cost-Effectiveness of Coordination
Contractors and Transportation Alternatives.
“...contracts shall be reviewed annually by the Community Transportation
Coordinator and the Coordinating Board as to the effectiveness and efficiency of
the Transportation Operator or the renewal of any Coordination Contracts.”
1. IF THE CTC HAS COORDINATION CONTRACTORS, DETERMINE THE COST-
EFFECTIVENESS OF THESE CONTRACTORS.
Cost [CTC and Coordination Contractor (CC)]
CTC CC #1 CC #2 CC #3 CC #4
Flat contract rate (s) ($ amount /
unit)
Detail other rates as needed: (e.g.
ambulatory, wheelchair, stretcher,
out-of-county, group)
Special or unique considerations that influence costs?
Explanation:
CC#1=Sunrise; CC#2=Easter Seals; CC#3=Goodwheels, David Lawrence and Hope Hospice did not
provide service last year.
52
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 308 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
Page 27
2. DO YOU HAVE TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES? Yes No
(Those specific transportation services approved by rule or the Commission as a service not
normally arranged by the Community Transportation Coordinator, but provided by the
purchasing agency. Example: a neighbor providing the trip)
Cost [CTC and Transportation Alternative (Alt.)]
CTC Alt. #1 Alt. #2 Alt. #3 Alt. #4
Flat contract rate (s) ($ amount /
unit)
Detail other rates as needed: (e.g.
ambulatory, wheelchair, stretcher,
out-of-county, group)
Special or unique considerations that influence costs?
Explanation:
IS THE CTC IN COMPLIANCE WITH THIS SECTION? Yes No
N/A
53
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 309 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
Page 28
RULE 41-2
Findings:
Recommendations:
54
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 310 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
Page 29
COMPLIANCE WITH 41-2, F.A.C.
Compliance with Commission Standards
“...shall adhere to Commission approved standards …”
Review the TDSP for the Commission standards.
Commission Standards Comments
Local toll free phone number
must be posted in all vehicles.
Vehicle Cleanliness
Passenger/Trip Database
55
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 311 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
Page 30
Adequate seating
Driver Identification
Passenger Assistance
Smoking, Eating and Drinking
56
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 312 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
Page 31
Two-way Communications
Air Conditioning/Heating
Billing Requirements
57
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 313 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
Page 32
COMMISSION STANDARDS
Findings:
Recommendations:
58
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 314 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
Page 33
COMPLIANCE WITH 41-2, F.A.C.
Compliance with Local Standards
“...shall adhere to Commission approved standards...”
Review the TDSP for the Local standards.
Local Standards Comments
Transport of Escorts and
dependent children policy
Use, Responsibility, and cost of
child restraint devices
Out-of-Service Area trips
CPR/1st Aid
Driver Criminal Background
Screening
Rider Personal Property
Advance reservation
requirements
Pick-up Window
The TDSP addresses this standard. Personal care attendants must
be approved on initial customer application with medical
documentation for reason attendant is needed. If an escort/
personal care attendant is requested, they will be transported at
no additional charge.
The TDSP addresses this standard. All drivers in the coordinated system
must have a “favorable” background check from the Florida Department
of Law Enforcement (“favorable” as defined by the Department of
Children and Families policies and procedures).
The TDSP addresses this standard. Reservations are taken a day in advance
up to 5 p.m. the business day prior to the trip request. Passengers with an
urgent need to travel should call the CTC. Unless other regulations are
applicable, same day trip requests cannot be guaranteed. However, the CTC
will attempt to accommodate the request.
TDSP addresses this standard. For the focus of this evaluation the 30 minute early to
zero minute late medical and employment policy was reviewed for trips. Effective
12-04-2019 the LCB approved a negotiated methodology for trips based on a mileage based
scheduling. The TDSP will be amended to include the updated window policy.
59
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 315 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
Page 34
Measurable
Standards/Goals
Standard/Goal Latest Figures Is the
CTC/Operator
meeting the
Standard?
Public Transit Ridership CTC CTC
Operator A Operator A
Operator B Operator B
Operator C Operator C
On-time performance CTC CTC
Operator A Operator A
Operator B Operator B
Operator C Operator C
Passenger No-shows CTC CTC
Operator A Operator A
Operator B Operator B
Operator C Operator C
Accidents CTC CTC
Operator A Operator A
Operator B Operator B
Operator C Operator C
Roadcalls
Average age of fleet:
CTC CTC
Operator A Operator A
Operator B Operator B
Operator C Operator C
Complaints
Number filed:
CTC CTC
Operator A Operator A
Operator B Operator B
Operator C Operator C
Call-Hold Time CTC CTC
Operator A Operator A
Operator B Operator B
Operator C Operator C
No more than 1.2
per 100,000 miles
No less than
10,000 miles
60
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 316 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
Page 35
LOCAL STANDARDS
Findings:
Recommendations:
The on-time performance for medical and employment continues to be an issue. During the annual public workshop
meeting the STARability Foundation indicated various of its participants at various locations are being picked up or
dropped off late sometimes by hours at a time and requested a better method of communicating with families when
buses will be late. Comments from rider surveys also mention late drop off and pick up times for medical and
employment as being issues. Three respondents indicated a heightened level of stress of not knowing whether they
would get to their destinations on time. One of these three respondents is no longer using the service for this reason
and another respondent indicated that they are paying Uber or a friend to get them to their destination and only
using the service for trips that are not time sensitive. Other comments included that they are not being notified of
tardiness, and vehicle issues or being notified hours after an issue has occurred which does not allow them to find an
alternative way home. Comments also indicated they are having issues with the incorrect scheduling of their trips.
The CTC is encouraged to provide in their quarterly report to the LCB the on-time performance for medical and
employment trips individually not just as part of the overall on time performance for all trips. It is also encouraged
that they provide a quarterly report to the LCB on measures that are being done to help address these issues with on
time performance.
The CTC is encouraged to devise a system to inform passengers of when their driver would be arriving and to
confirm scheduling information for their trips. The CTC is encouraged to pursue the phone system to enhance
customer service.
In the next TDSP update service standard changes due to new trip assignment methodology should be reflected in
Pick-Up Window, and return trip scheduling.
61
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 317 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
: til+uNJ: l0l
RIDE A VEHICLE WITIN TFIE COORDINATED SYSTEM. REQUEST A
COPY OF TFIE MANIFEST PAGE THAT CONTAINS THIS TRIP.
Date of Observation:\lr3lzoar
Please list any special guests that were present:
ON-Srrn Onsrnv.lrroN oF TrrE Sysrnnr
Location:U -ADT L{A EXCHA E
Number of Passengers picked up/dropped off:
Ambulatory
Non-Ambulatory
Was the driver on time? B Yes No - How many minutes late/early?
Did the driver provide any passenger assistance? E Yes E No
Was the driver wearing any identification?tr Yes: flunifo.rn O Name Tag
fl to euag" D No
Did the driver render an appropriate greeting?
Ey". ENo E Driver regularly transpo(s the rider, not necessary
IfCTC has a poticy on seat belts, did the driver ensure the passengers were properly belted?
XYestrNo
Was the vehicle neat and clean, and free from dirt, torn upholstery, damaged or broken seats,
protruding metal or other objects? ( y"r E No
Is there a sign posted on the interior ofthe vehicle with both a local phone number and the TD
Helpline for comments/complaints/commendations? E Yes tr No
Does the vehicle have working heat and air conditioning?AYesONo
Does the vehicle have two-way communications in good working o.d".? X Yes No
Ifused, was the lift in good working order?o
6
3
j
Page 45
E Yes No
n
I
62
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 318 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
Was there safe and appropriate seating for all passengers?
Did the driver properly use the lift and secure the passenger?
If No, please explain:
EYesnNo
XYesnNo
CTC:Counly:
Date of Ride:
Number of Round Tri ps Number of Riders/Beneficiaries to Survev0 200 3j%o
201 - 1200 t0%
l20l +
Funding Source No.
of Trips
No. of
Riders/Beneficiaries
No. of Calls
to Make
No. of
Calls Made
CTD
Medicaid
Other
Other
oth er)
Other
Totals
Page 46
Note: Attach the manifest
63
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 319 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
Vehicle: 830-Glaval
1117
Driver Name: Andy Ramtahal [ 4:35AM - 4:06P]q Fot: 1l23l2O2ORun: 101 [ 4:35AM - 4:05PMl
Stop Time Customer Name
8:29AM
Stop Address
7905 Preserve Cir APT -111 GATECODE 1395
Naples, FL 341 19
894861 9:20AM D Stop Time
Odometer
B:29AM
Pick Up
Customer Pay:
$1.00
AtGnA"i;, t -cueiii: o
Fare Type: Assorted
222878
ancellation
No Show
Complete
lvlobility:WHEELCHAIR AssistanceNeed
Cash Paid Ahead Return Pay Tickets
Funding Source: ADA
Daily Pass Sold
B:43AM gate code #2952
6900 Hunlington Lakes Cir. APT202 Gate code f6595
Naples, FL 34119
867942 9:20AM D Stop Time
Odometer
8r43AM
222441
ancellation
No Show
Complete
Pick Up
Customer Pay:
$1.00
Attendants: 0 Guesls: 0 Mobility: AMB Assistance Need
Comments:#6595
Fare Type: Assorted Cash Paid Ahead Return Pay Tickets
Daily Pass Sold
Funding Source: TDC
9:13AM
Drop Off
UCP-ADT
4227 Exchange Ave
Naples, FL 34104
824885 9:20AM D Stop Time
Odometer
9:1 3ANI
222891
Attendants: 0 Guests: 0 lvobility: WHEELCHAIR Assistance Need
Comments:one way
Daily Pass Sold
UCP-ADT
4227 Exchange Ave
Naples, FL 34104
867942 9.'13AtM
222891
Attendants: 0 Guests: 0
Comments:#6595
Mobility: AlvlB Assistance Need:Funding Source: TDC
Daily Pass Sold
Page 4 of B Driver Initial $'*.,,"ry,g.
Conf. # Request Time Validation lnformation
tr
tr
Funding Source: ADA
9:13AM
Drop Off
9:20AM D Stop Time
Odometer
t.
Run By Vehicle 64
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 320 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged
Vehicle: B30-Glaval
1117
Driver Name: Andy Rarntahal [ 4:35AM - 4:06Pi/tJ Foti 1l23l2O2ORun: l0'l [ 4:35AM - 4:06Pill
Stop Time Customer Name Stop Address Conf. # Request Time Validation Informption
9:13AM
Drop Off
UCP-ADT
4227 Exchange Ave
Naples, FL 34'104
a29A22 9:20AM D Stop Time
Odometer
9:13AM
222891
Attendants: 0 Guests: O Mobility: WHEELCHAIR Assistance Need
Daily Pass Sold
Funding Source: ADA
9:13AM
Drop Off
UCP-ADT
4227 Exchange Ave
Naples, FL 34104
894861 g:20AM D Stop Time
Odometer
9:'13AM
222891
Attendants: o Guests: 0 Mobility: WHEELCHAIR Assistance Need
Daily Pass Sold
Funding Source: ADA
9:'l3AM
Drop Off
UCP-ADT
4227 Exchange Ave
Naples, FL 34104
671431 9:20AM D Stop Time
Odometer
9:13AM
222891
Attendants: 0 Guests:o Mobility: A[48
Daily Pass Sold
Assistance Need Funding Source: TDC
9.13AM
Drop Off
L'CP-ADT
4227 Exchange Ave
Naples, FL 34104
878089 9:204M D Stop Time
Odometer 222891
Attendants: 0 Guests: 0 lilobility: AMB
Daily Pass Sold
Funding Source: ADA
Run By Vehicle Page 5 of B Driver Initial:I nout.rvrrt.t
Assistance Need:
9:13ANil
1 65
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 321 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged
BUS: rrr:+ Ruf,\.\o\
zuDE A VEHICLE WITIN THE COORDINATED SYSTEM. REQI.IESTA
COPY OF THE MANIFEST PAGE THAT CONTAINS THIS TRIP.
Date of Observation I acD
Please list any special guests that were present:
ON-Srrr OsspRvarroN oF THE Sysrr,y
Location:qs5 cl ,ll t
Number of Passengers picked up/dropped oft
Ambulatory
Non-Ambulatorv
Was the driver on time? E Yes I No - How many minutes late/early?
Did the driver provide any passenger assisrance? E Yes No
Was the driver wearing any identification?I Yes: E Unifo.rn O Name Tag
El Io sadge O No
Did the driver render an appropriate greeting?
By., E No E Driver regularly transports the rider, not necessary
If CTC has a policy on seat belts, did the driver ensure the passengers were properly belted?
&YestrNo
Was the vehicle neat and clean, and free from dirt, torn upholstery, damaged or broken seats,
protruding metal or other objects? tr yes tr No
Is there a sign posted on the interior ofthe vehicle with both a local phone number and the TD
Helpline for comments/complaints/commendations? E Yes E No
Does the vehicle have working heat and air conditioning?E Yes t\o
Does the vehicle have two-way communications in good working order? E yes No
If used, was the lift in good working order?L] Yes
t
I
N/A
I
No
I
Page 45
66
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 322 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
Was there safe and appropriate seating for all passengers?
Did the driver properly use the lift and secure ttre passenger? \ /fi,
If No, please explain:
& Yes No
Yes I No
CTC:County:
Date of Ride:
Number of Round Trips Number of Riders/Beneficiaries to Sunev
0-200 30%
201 1200 t0%
l20l +5%
Funding Source No.
of Trips
No. of
Riders/Beneficia ries
No. of Calls
to Make
No. of
Calls Made
CTD
Medicaid
Other
Other
Other)
Other
Totals
Page 46
Note: Attach the manifest
67
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 323 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
Vehicle: B3o-Glaval
1117
Run: 101 [ 4:35AM - 4:06PMJ Driver Name: Andy Ramtahal [ 4:35AM - 4:06Pf{l For: 1l23t2OZ0
Stop Time Customer Name Stop Address Conf. # Request Time Validation lnformation
9:32AM
Pick Up
Customer Pay:
$1.00
ettenOints: o-- Or.ii", o
Fare Type: Assorted
4559 Boabadilla St
Naples, FL 34103
898895 '10:00AM D Stop Time
Odometer
9:32AN.4
222897
Cancellation
No Show
Complete
Mobility: AMB
cash Paid Ahead
Assistance Need
Return Pay Tickets
Funding Source: ADA
Daily Pass Sold
9:47AM
Drop Off
Attendants: 0 Guests: 0 Nilobility: AMB
Daily Pass Sold
Pavillion PIaza
833 Vanderbilt Beach Rd THEATERy MOVIES
Naples, FL 34108
Assistance Need:
8S8895 10:00AM D Stop Time
Odometer
9:47AlM
222901
Funding Source: ADA
'10r17ANi
Pick Up
Customer Pay:
$1.00
At;;G;G, O Or""t"'-o rr,roOirity: enlA
Fare Type: Assorted Cash Paid Ahead
Daily Pass Sold
2334 Oueens Way
Naples. FL 34112
Assistance Need
Return Pay Tickets
859606 ,0:30AM D Stop Time
Odometer
10:17ANI
222913
Funding Source: TDC
10:35AN4
Drop Off
Daily Pass Sold
ARBY'S RESTAURANT
2436 Pine Ridge Rd 43,12264
Naples, FL 34109
Assistance Need:
859606 'l0r35AM
222921
Fundang Source:TDC
RouteMatch
Softuale'
Run By Vehicle Page 6 of 8 Driver Initial;s
Cancellation n
No Show !
Complete I
Attendants: 0 Guests; 0 Mobility: AN4B
10:30AM D Stop Time
Odometer
68
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 324 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged
s: cca-arqn RuN,roa
zuDE A VEHICLE WITIN THE COORDINATED SYSTEM. REQI]'EST A
COPY OF THE MANIFEST PAGE THAT CONTAINS THIS TRIP.
Date of Observation:tla3/ao)c)
On-Srrr OssrRvnrloN oF THE Sysruu
Location:aq +B lcrr Street
Ambulatory
Non-Ambulatory
Was the driver on time? tr Yes tr No - How many minutes latelearly?
Did the driver provide any passenger assistance? tr Yes No
Does the vehicle have working heat and air conditioning?
Does the vehicle have two-way communications in good working order?Yes No
Ifused, was the lift in good vvorking order? |.1/[
D NoYes
D
E
E
ts
I
t
t
Page 45
Yes No
Please list any special guests that were present:
Number of Passengers picked up/dropped off:
Was the driver wearing any identification? E Yes: E Unifo.. I Name Tag
I to eadge O No
Did the driver render an appropriate greeting?
EIy". [No 0 Driver regularly transports the rider, not necessary
If CTC has a policy on seat belts, did the driver ensure the passengers were properly belted?
EyesONo
Was the vehicle neat and clean, and free from dirt. torn upholstery, damaged or broken seats.
protruding metal or other objects? A yes I No
ls there a sign posted on the interior ofthe vehicle with both a local phone number and the TD
Helpline for comments/complaints/commendations? E Yes tr No
69
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 325 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
Was there safe and appropriate seating for all passengers?
Did the driver properly use the lift and secure the passenger? [.{N,
If No. please explain:
EI Yes D No
Yes No
CTC:County:
Date of Ride:
Number of Round Trips Number of Riders/Beneficiaries to Suney
0-200 30o/o
201 1200 1oyo
l20l +5%
Funding Source No.
of Trips
No. of
Riders/Beneficiaries
No. of Calls
to Make
No. of
Calls Made
CTD
Medicaid
Other
Other
Other)
Other
Totals
Page 46
Note: Attach the manifest
70
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 326 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
Eugenio . Rodriguez [ 3:00AM -
5:10PMl
Vehicle: CC2-2'197 Run: 102 [ 3:00AM - 5:10PM]Driver Name:Fot:112312020
Stop Time Customer Name Conf. # Request TimeStop Address Validation lnformation
2:45PM
Pick Up
Customer Pay:
$4.00
2978 Poplar St
Naples, FL 34112
900363 2:45PM
23424
Cancellation
No Show
Complete
Attendants: 0 Guests.o
Comments:one way
Fare Type: Assoded
Mobility: AMB Assistance Need:
Cash Paid Ahead Return Pay Tickets
Funding Source: TDC
Daily Pass Sold
3:41PM
Drop Off
PUBLIX
3304 Bonita Beach Rd
Bonita Springs, FL 34134
900363 3:l8PM D Stop Time
Odometer
3:41P1,4
23441
Attendants: 0 Guesls: 0 Mobility: ANiB Assistance Need Funding Source: TDC
COmments:one Way
Daily Pass Sold
Total Customer Pay: $31.00
.t
Run By Vehicle Paqe 9 of 9 Driver Initial:RouteMatch
Softuare'
3:l8PM D Stop Time
Odometer
71
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 327 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged
B)5: cca-a\cl? RuN.toa
zuDE A VEHICLE WITIN THE COORDTNATED SYSTEM. REQI,EST A
COPY OF THE MANIFEST PAGE THAT CONTAINS THIS TRIP.
Or
Please list any special guests that were present:
ON-Srrn OnsrnvatroN oF THE Sysrrlr
Location Colti I trarsrt oc:l.ro Qp
Number of Passengers picked up/dropped off:
Was the driver on time? El Yes
Did the driver provide any passenger assistance? ts Yes E No
Was the driver wearing any identification?E Yes: K urifo., ! Name Tag
) Io Budg" I No
Did the driver render an appropriate greeting?
EY"r INo E Driver regularly transports the rider, not necessary
Il CTC has a policy on seat belts. did the driver ensure the passengers were properly belted?
EyesO No
Was the vehicle neat and clean, and free from dirt, tom upholstery, damaged or broken seats,
protruding metal or other objects? [ V"r tr No
ls there a sign posted on the interior ofthe vehicle with both a local phone number and the TD
Helpline for comments/complaints/commendations? E Yes I No
Does the vehicle have working heat and air conditioning?Yes No
Does the vehicle have two-way communications in good working order? Yes I No
If used. was the lift in good working order? [/[
E
&
D
I
Page 45
Yes No
Date of Observation:
Ambulatory
Non-Ambulatory
I No - How many minutes late/early?
I
72
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 328 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
Was there safe and appropriate seating for all passengers?B Yes l No
Did the driver properly use the lift and secure the passenger? frl/{Yes E No
lf No, please explain:
CTC:Counfv:
Number of Round Trips Number of Riders/Beneficiaries to Survev
0-200 30%
201 - tz00 l0Yo
l20l +5Yo
Funding Source No.
of Trips
No. of
Riders/Beneficiaries
No. of Calls
to Make
No. of
Calls Made
CTD
Medicaid
Other
Other
Other)
Other
Totals
Page 46
Note: Attach the manifest
D
Date of Ride:
73
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 329 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
Driver Name:Eugenio . Rodriguez [ 3;00AM -
5:10Pifl
Foti 112312020
Stop Time Customer Name Stop Address Conf. # Request Time
1:17PM
Pick Up
Customer Pay:
$1.00
Attendants: 0 Guests:o lilobility: AMB
Fare Type ; Assorted Cash Paid Ahead
Daily Pass Sold
LORENZO WALKER INSTITUTE
3702 ESTEY AVE- MAIN ENTRANCE
NAPLES, FL 34104
860556 1:'loPM P Stop Time
Odometer
1:17PM
23394
Cancellation
No Show
Complete
Assistance Need:
Return Pay Tickets
Funding Source: ADA
1:37PM
Drop Off
Attendants: 0 Guests: 0 Mobility: AMB
Daily Pass Sold
BOCA PALMS
10292 Boca Cir.
Naples, FL 34109
860556 1:l0PM P Stop Time
Odomeler 23403
Funding Source: ADA
2:15PM
Pick Up
Customer Pay:
$0.00
An;danis o -bru"ii, o
Fare Type : Assorted Cash
Daily Pass Sold
COLLIER AREA PARA TRANSIT
8300 Radio Rd UNLOAD AT FRONT DOOR
Naples, FL 34104
Assistance Need:
Return Pay Tickets Prepaid - 10 Punch h Paid Ahead
Funding Source;ADA
Return Pay Tickets
898549 'l:40PM P Stop Time
Odometer 23415
2:15PI\,Cancellation
No Show
Complete
Mobility: AMB
Paid Ahead
2:30PM
Drop Off
4123 Thomasson Ln #B
Naples, FL 341'12
1:40PM P Stop Time
Odometer
2:30PM
23421
Attendants: 0 Guests; 0 lvlobility: AMB
Daily Pass Sold
Assistance Need Funding Source: ADA
Page I of 9 Driver Initial:
Vehicle: CC2-2197 Run: 102 [ 3:00AM - 5:10PIr[l
Validation lnformation
1 .37PM
Assistance Need:
898549
(,\Run By Vehicle ,$ nu,rr.rur".19174
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 330 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged
805: ccz- toqq RrrN aoo
RIDE A VEHICLE WITIN TTIE COORDINATED SYSTEM. REQUEST A
COPY OF THE MAMFEST PAGE THAT CONTAINS THIS TRIP.
Date of Observation olla4laoao
Please list any special guests that were present:
Location:
Number ofPassengers picked up/dropped off:
Ambulatory
Non-Ambulatorv
Was the driver on time? E Yes E No - How many minutes latelearly?
Did the driver provide any passenger assistance?B Yes E No
Was the driver wearing any identification?El Yes: E unifo.m I Name Tag
Bl to tudg" D No
Did the driver render an appropriate greeting?
Ely"r ENo E Driver regularly transports the rider, not necessary
If CTC has a policy on seat belts, did the driver ensure the passengers were properly belted?
EYesI No
Was the vehicle neat and clean, and free from dirt, torn upholstery, damaged or broken seats,
protruding metal or other objects? E Yes tr No
Is there a sign posted on the interior ofthe vehicle with both a local phone number and the TD
Helpline for comments/complaints/commendations? El Yes E No
Does the vehicle have working heat and air conditioning?Yes E No
Does the vehicle have two-way communications in good working order? Yes No
If used, was the lift in good working order? \/fi
E
E
II
Ox-Srrr Onsnnva,rroN oF THE Sysrpu
I
I
Page 45
Yes No
I
I
75
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 331 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
Was there safe and appropriate seating for all passengers?
Yes NoDid the driver properly use the lift and secure the passenger?
N/A Dqeseneer uq\Ked onto bos,
If No, please explain:
CTC:County:
Date of Ride:
Number of Round Trips Number of Riders/Beneficiaries to Sunev
0-200 3lYo
201 - 1200 l0o/o
l20l +5o/o
Funding Source No.
of Trips
No. of
Riders/Beneficiaries
No. of Calls
to Make
No. of
Calls Made
CTD
Medicaid
Other
Other
Other)
Other
Totals
Page 46
Note: Attach the manifest
EYesnNo
76
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 332 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
0{e
Stop Tlme Customer Name
4:30PM
Stop Addres8
3295 Twllight Ln APT 5301 GATECODE- #8993
Naples, FL 34109
Drlyor Nlmel Douglar Andereon [ 7:tllAl,l .
0:tl6Pi0
Conf. # Request Tlme
494477
vohlcle: 825€laval Run: 200 [ 7!41Ail - 6!tt6Pi4
1
offropD
3:10PM P Stop'Ttme
Odometer
Fori 1DA[2O2O
Valldatlon lnrormatlon
4:30Pi/l
255399
\ttendants: 0 Guests: 0 Mobility: AMB
Daily Pass Sold
Assistance Need:Funding Source: TDC
4:40PM
Drop Of,
VILLAGE AT EIVERALD LAKES 4
7743 Jewel Ln APT '101
Naples, FL 34109
766591 3:15PM P Stop Ime
Odometer
4:40PM
2s 01
\ttendants: 0 Guests: 0 Mobilityi WHEELCHAIR
Daily Pass Sold
Assistance Need:Funding Source: ADA
5:12PM
Pick Up
Customer Pay:
$1.00
Golden Gate Senior Center
4898 Coronado Pkwy
Naples, FL 34116
900730 4:30PM P Stop 1me
odometer
5:12PNI
255411
Cancellation
No Show
Complete
\ttendants: 0 Guests: 0 Mobility: CANE Assistance Need
:ars Type : Assorted Gash Paid Ahead Return Pay lickets
Daily Pass Sold
Funding Source: ADA
5:41PM
Drop Off
HENDERSON CREEK
1032 DOCKSTDE DR #102
Naples, FL 34114
900730 4:30PM P Stop Ime
Odometer
5:41P[I
255421
\ttendants: 0 Guests: 0 Mobility; CANE
Daily Pass Sold
Assistance Need Funding Source: ADA
& Paratransit Run By Vehicle Page 6 of 7 Driver Initial:Sn ',.rrngg-77
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 333 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged
B S: M\-RUN $l
RIDE A VEHICLE WITIN THE COORDINATED SYSTEM. REQTIEST A
COPY OF THE MANIFEST PAGE TIIAT CONTAINS THIS TRIP.
Date of Observation:I I 0
Please list any special guests that were present:
Ox-Srrr OrsnnvarroN oF THE SysrBur
Location
Number ofPassengers picked up/dropped off:
Ambulatorv
Non-Ambulatory
Was the driver on time?tr Yes No - How many minutes late/early?
Did the driver provide any passenger assistance?E Yes E No
Was the driver wearing any identification?E Yes: E unifo.rn D Name Tag
E to n"dg" E No
Did the driver render an appropriate greeting?
E Y"r I No E Driver regularly transpo(s the rider, not necessary
If CTC has a policy on seat belts, did the driver ensure the passengers were properly belted?
&YesO No
Was the vehicle neat and clean, and free from dirt, tom upholstery, damaged or broken seats,
protruding metal or other objects? E Yes D No
Is there a sign posted on the interior of the vehicle with both a local phone number and the TD
Helpline for comments/complaints/commendations? E Yes tr No
Does the vehicle have working heat and air conditioning?B Yes E No
Does the vehicle have two-way communications in good working order? E Yes tr No
If used, was the tift in good working order? t.l/p,
L 3ENroK CLN1 Lt 4 0q 6 Coro n od o ?cr Ka)
4
4
Page 45
U Yes No
I
I
78
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 334 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
Was there safe and appropriate seating for all passengers?
Did the driver properly use the lift and secure the passenger? 1..[ /ff,
POss€qprs v.$<ed Onto bos
If No, please explain:
E Yes No
Yes E No
CTC:County:
Date of Ride:
Number of Round Trips Number of Riders/Beneficiaries to Survey
0 -200 30o/o
201 - 1200 llYo
l20l +50
Funding Source No.
of Trips
No. of
Riders/Beneficiaries
No. of Calls
to Make
No. of
Calls Made
CTD
Medicaid
Other
Other
Other)
Other
Totals
Page 46
Note: Attach the manifest
I
I
79
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 335 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
vehicle: MV607 Driver Name: Angel . Crespo [ 5:414M - 5:50Pilll Fot:, 11241?020
StoD Time Customer Name Stop Address Conf. # Request Time Validation lnformation
3:09P N4
Pick Up
Customer Pay
$3.00
Attendants: 0 Guests: 0 Mobility: AMB
Fare Type : Assorted Cash Paid Ahead
Jewish Federation
5025 Caslello Dr #102
Naples, FL 34'103
Assistance Need:
Return Pay Tickets
885'115 2:30PM P Stop Time
Odometer
Funding Source: ADA
3:09PM Cancellation
No Show
Complete
3:38PNI
Drop Off
Attendants: 0 Guests: 0 Mobility: AMB
Daily Pass Sold
'l 148 Foxfire Ln
Naples, FL 34104
8851'15 2:30PM P Stop Time
Odometer
Funding Source: ADA
3:38PM
Assistance Need.
4:01PM
Pick Up
Customer Pay:
$1.00
Attendants: 0 Guests: 0 Mobility: AMB
Fare Type : Assorted Cash Paid Ahead
Daily Pass Sold
Golden Gate Senior Center
4898 Coronado Pkwy
Naples, FL 34116
Assistance Need
Return Pay Tickets
886375 3:30PM P Stop Time
Odometer
Funding Source: TDC
4:01PM
171587
Cancellation
No Show
Complete
4r01PM
Pick Up
Customer Pay:
-11:90Attendants: 0 Guests:0 Mobility: CANE
Fare Type: Assorted Cash Paid Ahead
Daily Pass Sold
Golden Gate Senior Center
4898 Coronado Pkwy
Naples, FL 34116
Assistance Need
Return Pay Tickets
3:30PM P Stop Time
Odometer
4,O1PM
171587
Cancellation
No Show
Complete
Funding Source: TDC
Run By Vehicle Page 10 of 12 Driver Initial:I nout"vr,g;.t'
Run: 111 [ 5:41AM - 5:50PMl
Daily Pass Sold
17'1 581
89'1110
i..)80
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 336 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged
Vehlcl6: tlv607 Run: 111 [5!41A - 5:50Ptr1
S:top Addrcge
Drlver Name: Angol . Crg3po [ 5!414 - 5:50P 1 Fori 1l?Al2O2O
Conf,# Request Time Validatlon lnformatlon
881075 4:0PM
'171587
stdp Time Customer Name
4:0'lPM
Pick Up
Customer Pay:
s1.00
Golden Gate Senior Center
4898 Coronado Pkwy
Naples, FL 34116
3:30PM P Stop Time
Odometer
Cancellation
No Show
Complete
tr
\ttendants: 0 Guesls: 0 Mobility:AMB Assistance Need:
:are Type: Assorted ca6h Paid Ahead Return Pay Tickets
Daily Pass Sold
Funding Source; ADA
4:0'l PM
Pick Up
Customer Pay:
$r.00
Golden Gate Senior Center
4898 Coronado Pkwy
Naples, FL 341'16
742043 3:30PM P Stop Time
Odometer
4:0f M Cancellation fl
No Show
Complete
171587
qflendants: 0 Guests: 0 Mobility: AMB
Fare Type : Assorted Cash Paid Ahead Retum Pay
Daily Pass Sold
Assistance Need
Tickets
Funding Source: ADA
4:08PM 4484 30th Ave Sw
Naples, FL 34116
881075 3:30PM P Stop Time
Odomeler
4:08PM
p OffDro 171588
qttendants: 0 Guests: 0 Mobility; AMB
Daily Pass Sold
Assislance Need Funding Source: ADA
4:25PM 14950 Schooner Bay Ln apt 19203
Naples, FL 34119
742043 3:30PM P Stop Time
Odometer
4:25PM
Drop Off 17'1595
Attendanls; 0 Guests: 0 Mobility: AMB
Daily Pass Sold
Assistance Need Funding Source: ADA
L\Run By Vehicle Page 11 of 12 Driver Initial Sno,rt.rvrgpr'
l
81
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 337 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged
BJ5 ccz-zlq6 N \O3
RIDE A VEHICLE WITTN TTIE COORDINATED SYSTEM. REQUEST A
COPY OF TIIE MANIFEST PAGE TIIAT CONTAINS THIS TRIP.
Date of Observation:I 4 o
Please list any special guests that were present:
Ox-Srrn Onsrnva.rroN oF THE SysrBu
Location:
Number of Passengers picked up/dropped off:
Ambulatory
Non-Ambulatory
Was the driver on time?tr Yes E No - How many minutes late/early?
Did the driver provide any passenger assistance? B Yes No
Was the driver wearing any identification?E Yes: El uniform I Name Tag
E Io tadg" E No
Did the driver render an appropriate greeting?
E Yes ENo E Driver regularly transports the rider, not necessary
If CTC has a policy on seat belts, did the driver ensure the passengers were properly belted?
EyesE No
Was the vehicle neat and clean, and free from dirt, tom upholstery, damaged or broken seats,
protruding metal or other objects? E Yes tr No
Is there a sign posted on the interior ofthe vehicle with both a local phone number and the TD
Helpline for comments/complaints/commendations? E Yes tr No
Does the vehicle have working heat and air conditioning?B Yes No
Does the vehicle harre two-way communications in good working order? E Yes No
If used, was the lift in good working order? 1q/fi
4b 0
a
a
Page 45
I Yes No
I
u
I
I
82
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 338 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
Was there safe and appropriate seating for all passengers?
Did the driver properly use the lift and secure the passenger? N/A
k:aengers wq\ked on bris
If No, please explain:
EI Yes No
EYestrNo
CTC:Countv:
Date of Ride:
\umber of Round Trips Number of Riders/Beneficiaries to Sun'ey
0 200 30%
201 1200 10%
l20l +5'.vo
Funding Source No.
of Trips
No. of
Riders/Beneficiaries
No. of Calls
to Make
No. of
Calls Made
CTD
Medicaid
Other
Other
Other)
Other
Totals
Page 46
Note: Attach the manifest
t]
83
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 339 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
Vehicle; 'CG2-2196 Run:103 [ 4:49AM - 5:03PMl
Stop Time Customer Name Stop Address Conf. # Request Time Validation lnformation
1:53PN,4
Drop Off
530 18th St Se
Naples, FL 341'17
882349 1:30pM p Stop trme
Odometer
1;53PN4
13703
Attendants; 0 Guests: 0 N,4obility: AN,4BULATORY Assistance Need
Dailv Pass Sold
Funding Source: TDC
2:05PM
Drop Off
3560 Randall Blvd
Naples, FL 34120
899988 1:00PM P Stop]lme
Odometer
2:05P N.4
13709
Attendants: 1 Guests: 0 Mobility: AN/B
Daily Pass Sold
Funding Source: TDC
2:20Pli
Pick Up
Customer Pay:
$3.00
Palmetto Ridge Lane
1655 Victory Lane Rd
Naples, FL 34120
900763 2:05PM P Stop Ime
Odometer
2:20P[/
13716
Cancellation
No Show
Complete
Attendants: 0 Guests; 0 N,4obility: AMB Assistance Need:
Qsrnrnsnls;ONE - she will be in the FROIV of the school by the water towers
Fare Type: Assorted Cash Paid Ahead Return Pay Tickets
Daily Pass Sold
Funding Source: ADA
3,28 PNl
Pick Up
Customer Pay
$1.00
Golden Gate Senior Center
4898 Coronado Pkwy
Naples, FL 34116
900038 3:30pM p Stop Time
Odometer
3:28P[,4
137s0
Cancellation
No Show
Complete
Attendants: 0 Guests: 0 Mobility: WALKER Assistance Need
Fare Type: Assorted Cash Paid Ahead Return Pay Tickets
Daily Pass Sold
Funding Source: ADA
Run By Vehicle Page I of 10 Driver Initial:@n*r.rrrg#[.
Drlver Name: Cole . Fischer [ 4:49AM . 5:03PM] Fori 112412020
Assistance Need:
84
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 340 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged
Driver Name: Cole . Fischer [ 4:49AM - 5:03PM] Fori 1tZ4lZO2OVehicle: . CC2-2196 Run: 103 [ 4:49AM - 5:03PM]
Stop Address Validation lnformationStop Time Customer Name Conf. # Request Time
3:28PlV
Pick Up
Customer Pay
$1.00
Golden Gate Senior Center
4898 Coronado Pkwy
Naples, FL 34116
898103 3:00PM P Stop Time
Odometer
3:2BPM
Attendants: 0 Guests: 0 Mobility: AMB
Fare Type: Assorted Cash Paid Ahead
Daily Pass Sold
Assistance Need
Return Pay llckets
Funding Source: ADA
3:45 PN.4 12039 Sitterley St
Naples, FL 34113
Drop Off
Attendants: 0 Guests:0 Nlobility: A[,48 Assistance Need
Comments:ONE - she will be in the FROI\.4 of the school by the water towers
Daily Pass Sold
900763 2:05PM P Stop Tlme
Odometer
3:45P1\4
Funding Source: ADA
3:47 P M 954 Goodlette Rd N APT 2118
Naples, FL 34102
898103 3:00PM P Stop Ime
Odometer
3:47PM
Drop Off
Attendants: 0 Guests: 0 l\,4obility; AN.4B Assistance Need:Funding Source: ADA
Daily Pass Sold
4:20P M 11450 Whistlers Cove CirApt 421
Naples, F134113
Assistance Need
900038 4:20P14
13765Drop Off
Attendants: 0 Guests: 0 N.4obility: WALKER
Daily Pass Sold
Funding Source: ADA
Run By Vehicle Page I of 10 Driver Initial @***rE6n
13750
Cancellation !
No Show !
Comolete B
0
137 57
3:30PM P Stop Time
Odometer
85
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 341 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged
Bu5 CCZ,- 14 \0
zuDE A VEHICLE WITIN THE COORDINATED SYSTEM, REQUEST A
COPY OF T}IE MANIFEST PAGE THAT CONTAINS THIS TRIP.
Date of Observation:rlaqltoao
Please list any special guests that were present:
Ox-Srrr OssERvrrIoN oF THE Sysrsrr
Location 5l 5 EXFTUT\a- V
Number of Passengers picked up/dropped off:
Ambulatory
Non-Ambulatory
Was the driver on time?tr Yes No - Ho*'manv minutes latelearlv?
Did the driver provide any passenger assistance?E Yes D No
\\'as the drir,er uearing anv identiflcation?E Yes: fi unifo.. B Name Tag
E to eadge O No
Did the driver render an appropriate greeting?
fi Ves [No O Driver regularly transports the rider, not necessary
If CTC has a policy on seat belts, did the driver ensure the passengers were properly belted?
EYesO No
Was the vehicle neat and clean, and free from dirt. tom upholstery. damaged or broken seats,
protruding metal or other objects? E Yes I No
Is there a sign posted on the interior of the vehicle with both a local phone number and the TD
Helpline for comments/complaints/commendations? E Yes D No
Does the vehicle have working heat and air conditioning?Yes No
Does the vehicle have tlvo-rl,ay communications in good working order?Yes n No
If used. vvas the lift in good working order?U
E
E
&
I
Page 45
Yes No
I
86
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 342 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
Was there safe and appropriate seating for all passengers?
Did the driver properly use the lift and secure the passenger?
If No, please explain:
CTC:
Date of Ride:
EYesENo
EI Yes No
County:
Funding Source No.
of Trips
No. of
Riders/Beneficiaries
No. of Calls
to Make
No. of
Calls Made
CTD
Medicaid
Other
Other
Other)
Other
Totals
Number of Round Trips Number of Riders/Beneficiaries to Survey
0-200 30%
201 - 1200 t0%
1201 +5%
Page 46
Note: Attach the manifest
u
87
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 343 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
Vshlcle: B3l€laval
1110
Run: 108 [ 5r344il. 5:24PMl Dr|ver Namo: Franclaco . Lopoz [ 5:34AIt .
C:24Pill
Fori 1nqi2020
Stop Tlme Customer Namo Stop Addrcss Conf.# Reque.t Tlme Valldatlon lnfomatlon
1'l:'l0AM
Pick Up
Customer Pay:
$3.00
8507 Laurel Lakes Cv Gate code 1934
Naples, FL 34'l l 9
795203 12;00PM D Stop'Time
Odometer
'11:1oAM
182335
Cancellation
No Show
Complete
Attendants; 0 Guests: 0
Comments:at the gym
Fare Type: Assorted
Daily Pass Sold
Mobility: ELECTRIC WC Assistance Need
Cash Paid Ahead Return Pay llckets
Funding Source: ADA
11:33AM
Drop Off
YMCA
5450 YMCA RD 597-3148 EXT.375
NAPLES, FL 34109
795203 12:00PM D Stop Time
Odomeler
11:334M
182344
Attendants: 0 Guests: 0 Mobility: ELECTRIC WC Assistance Need:
Comments:at the gym
Daily Pass Sold
Funding Source: ADA
11 :54AM
Pick Up
Customer Pay:
$3.00
ARA-NAPLES DIALYSIS CENTER
4529 Executive Dr 56&7180-(+30 minutes, machine
time)
Naples, FL 34119
88A252 1l:45AM P Stop Time
Odometer
11:54AM
182351
Cancellation
No Show
Complete
Attendants: 0 Guests: 0 N4obility: WHEELCHAIR Assistance Need:
FareType: Assorted Cash PaidAhead Return Pay Tickets
Daily Pass Sold
Funding Source: ADA
12:23PM
Drop Off
The Arlington of Naples
8000 Arlington Circle Romm 3119
Naples, FL 34113
848252 11:45AM P Sbp Tlme
Odometer
12:23PM
182366
Attendants: 0 Guests: 0 Mobility: WHEELCHAIR Assistance Need:
Daily Pass Sold
Funding Source: ADA
& Faratransit Run By Vehicle Page 4 of 8 Driver Initial:S***rgpn
l
88
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 344 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged
b\)5 ccz-ztT+tae
RIDE A VEHICLE WITIN T}IE COORDINATED SYSTEM. REQUEST A
COPY OF TI{E MANIFEST PAGE THAT CONTAINS THIS TzuP.
Date of Observation t Ia{ laoao
Please list any special guests that were present
ON-SIrs OnsrRva,rroN oF THE Sysrrnr
Location:270 frn (',I +
Number of Passengers picked up/dropped off:
Ambulatorv
Non-Ambulatorv
Was the driver on time? tr Yes No - Ho*' many minutes late/early?
Did the driver provide any passenger assistance? E Yes E N*o
Was the driver wearing any identification?E Yes: El unifo.. D Name Tag
B Io eudg" I No
Did the driver render an appropriate greeting?
E y"r [No E Drir., regularly transpo(s the rider, not necessary
If CTC has a policy on seat belts, did the driver ensure the passengers were properly belted?
mYestrNo
Was the vehicle neat and clean, and free from dirt, tom upholstery, damaged or broken seats.
protruding metal or other objects? E Yes tr No
Is there a sign posted on the interior ofthe vehicle with both a local phone number and the TD
Helpline for comments/complaints/commendations? A Yes tr No
Does the vehicle have working heat and air conditioning?Yes No
Does the vehicle have two-way communications in good working order? Yes No
If used. was the lift in good working order?
g
E
ut
I
I
Page 45
Yes
I
NoD
89
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 345 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
Funding Source No.
of Trips
No. of
Riders/Beneficiaries
No. of Calls
to Make
No. of
Calls Made
CTD
Medicaid
Other
Other
Other)
Other
Totals
Was there safe and appropriate seating for all passengers?
Did the driver properly use the lift and secure the passenger?
If No, please explain:
EYesENo
EYesENo
CTC:County:Collier
Date of Ride:
Number of Round Trips Number of Riders/Beneficiaries to Survey
0-200 30%
201 - 1200 l0o/o
l20l +s%o
Page 46
Note: Attach the manifest
90
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 346 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
Vehlcle: CC2.2197 Run: 102 [ 3:44All - 3:4lPMl Drlver Name:Eugenlo . Roddguez [ 3:44AU .
3:41Pt4
For 1nq2u20
StbP Tlme Customer Name Stop AddrEsB Conf. # Request Tlm6 Valldatlon lnformatlon
8:57AM
Pick Up
Customer Pay:
$3.00
2167 43rd Ln Sw
Naples, FL34116
760900 9:40AM D Stop lime
Odometor
8:57AM
23537
Cancellalion
No Show
Complete
Attendants: 0 Guests: 0 N4obility: WHEELCHAIR Assistance Need:
Fare Type: Assorted Cash Paid Ahead Rstum Pay Tickets
Funding Source: ADA
Daily Pass Sold
9:244M
Drop Off
North Naples Oialysis
1750 Sw Health Pkwy
Naples, FL 34109
760900 9:40AM D Stop'1me
Odometer
9:24AM
23549
Attendants: 0 Guests: 0 Mobility: WHEELCHAIR Assistance Need:
Daily Pass Sold
Funding Source: ADA
9:49AM
Pick Up
Customer Pay:
$4.00
68 gth St
Bonita Springs, FL 34'i 34
800824 10:15AM D Stop Ime
Odometer
9:49AM
23556
Cancellation
No Show
Complete
Atlendants: 0 Guests: 0 Mobility: WHEELCHAIR Assistance Need:
Fare Type : Assorted Cash Paid Ahead Return Pay Tickets
Daily Pass Sold
Funding Source: TDC
10:09AM
Drop Off
next to lab corp unit -22
2700 lmmokalee Rd unit -22 592-011'l
Naples, FL 34109
800824 10:15AM D Stop fime
Odometer
'10:09AM
23563
Attendants: 0 Guests: 0 Nlobility: WHEELCHAIR Assistance Need:
Daily Pass Sold
Funding Source: TDC
& Paratransit Run By Vehicle Page 5 of 9 Driver Initial S*."r.rgpo91
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 347 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged
CCz^-t4tO RUN tO
RIDE A VEHICLE W]TIN TT{E COORDINATED SYSTEM. REQUEST A
COPY OF THE MAMFEST PAGE THAT CONTAINS THIS TRIP.
Date of Observation:a aoao
Please list any special guests that were present:
Ox-SrrB Onspnv.q.rroN oF THE Sysrnpr
Location:W00DSiDE 1ANE5.,8525 nodio Rod
Number ofPassengers picked up/dropped off:
Ambulatory
Non-Ambulatory
Was the driver on time?Yes E No - How many minutes late/early?
Did the driver provide any passenger assistance?Yes u No
Was the driver wearing any identification?I Yes: El unifo.- E Name Tag
E neadge E No
Did the driver render an appropriate greeting?
El y"r UNo O Driver regularly transports the rider, not necessary
If CTC has a policy on seat belts, did the driver ensure the passengers were properly belted?
EYestr No
Was the vehicle neat and clean, and free from dirt, tom upholstery, damaged or broken seats,
protruding metal or other objects? E Yes tr No
ls there a sign posted on the interior of the vehicle with both a local phone number and the TD
Helpline for comments/complaints/commendations? E Yes E No
Does the vehicle have working heat and air conditioning?E Yes No
Does the vehicle have two-way communications in good working order? E Yes No
If used, was the lift in good working order?E
I
I
Page 45
Yes
tr
No
TI
I
I
92
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 348 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
Was there safe and appropriate seating for all passengers?
Did the driver properly use the lift and secure the passenger?
If No, please explain:
E Yes No
A Yes No
CTC:County:
Date of Ride:
Number of Round Trips Number of Riders/Beneficiaries to Survey
0-200 30%
201 - 1200 t0v,
1201 +50
Funding Source No.
of Trips
No. of
Riders/Beneficiaries
No. of Calls
to Make
No. of
Calls Made
CTD
Medicaid
Other
Other
Other)
Other
Totals
Page 46
Note: Attach the manifest
I
I
93
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 349 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
Vehicle: 831-Glaval
1410
Run: 108 [ 5:34AM - 5:24PMI Driver Name:Francisco . Lopez [ 5:34AM -
5:24PMl
Fot:'112412020
Stop Time Customer Name Stop Address Conf. # Request Time Validation lnformation
12:46PM
Pick Up
Customer Pay:
$3.00
14731NAUTILUS PL
Naples, FL 34114
900662 12:'l5PM P Stop Time
Odometer
'12:46P[.4
182373
Cancellation
No Show
Complete
Attendants: 0 Guests: 0 N,4obility: ELECTRIC WC Assistance Need
Fare Type: Assorted Cash Paid Ahead Return Pay llckets
Daily Pass Sold
Funding Source: ADA
1:14P1'A
Drop Off
WOODSIDE LANES
8525 Radio Rd 455-3755
Naples, FL 34'104
900662 '12:lsPM P Stop Time
Odometer
1:14PN,4
182344
Attendants: 0 Guests: 0 [Iobility: ELECTRIC WC Assistance Need:
Daily Pass Sold
Funding Source: ADA
1:57Pll
Pick Up
Customer Pay
$3.00
ARA-Naples South Dialysis
4270 famiami ftail E Naples ofAVALON DR. near
Thomasson.
Naples, FL 34112
896025 1:30PM P Stop Time
Odometer
1:57PN,l
'182393
Attendants: 0 Guests: 0 Mobility: AMB
Fare Type : Assorted Cash Paid Ahead
Daily Pass Sold
Assistance Need
Return Pay llckets
Funding Source: ADA
2:1 I P [.4
Drop Off
896025 1:30PM P Stop "6me
Odometer
2:1gPN/
182399
Attendants: 0 Guests: 0 Mobility: AMB
Daily Pass Sold
Assistance Need:Funding Source: ADA
Run By Vehicle Page 5 of I Driver Initial S*."..rgpg.
Cancellation I
No Show I
Complete I
3382 Dorado Way
Naples, FL 34'105
94
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 350 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged
BU5 CL-B EUN 3B
RIDE A VEHICLE WITIN THE COORDINATED SYSTEM. REQIJEST A
COPY OF THE MANIFEST PAGE THAT CONTAINS THIS TRIP.
Date of Observation:tlztltozo
Please list any special guests that $,ere present:
Ox-SlrB OnssnvA.rroN oF THE Sysrnu
Location:
\umber of Passengers picked up/dropped olf:
Ambulatorv
Non-Ambulatory
Was the driver on time? E Yes D No - How many minutes late/early?
Did the driver provide any passenger assistance? El Yes O No
Was the driver wearing any identification?ts Yes: E unifo.* [ Name Tag
EI Io eaage I No
Did the driver render an appropriate greeting?
& y.. I No E Driver regularly transports the rider. not necessary
If CTC has a policy on seat belts, did the driver ensure the passengers were properly belted?
EYesI No
Was the vehicle neat and clean, and free from dirt, torn upholstery, damaged or broken seats,
protruding metal or other objects? E Yes tr No
Is there a sign posted on the interior oflthe vehicle with both a local phone number and the TD
Helpline for comments/complaints/commendations? B| Yes O No
Does the vehicle have working heat and air conditioning?E Yes I
DDoes the vehicle have two-way communications in good working order? E Yes No
If used, was the lift in good working order?
A.IS ExE.E
Z
2
Page 45
8l Yes tr No
No
95
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 351 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
Was there safe and appropriate seating for all passengers?
Did the driver properly use the lift and secure the passenger?
If No, please explain:
CTC:
Date of Ride:
E Yes tr No
EYesENo
County:
Funding Source No.
of Trips
No. of
Riders/Beneficiaries
No. of Calls
to Make
No. of
Calls Made
CTD
Medicaid
Other
Other
Other)
Other
Totals
Number of Round Trips Number of Riders/Beneficiaries to Survey
0-200 30o/o
201 - t200 t0%
1201 +5%
Page 46
Note: Attach the manifest
96
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 352 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
Vehicle: 836-Glaval
1844
Run:138 [ 7:13AM - 6:45PM]Driver Name: Yvonne. Rivera [ 7:13AM - 6:45PMl Foti 112412020
Stop Time Customer Name Stop Address Conf. # Request Time Validation lnformation
1O:17AM
Drop Off
PUBLIX
4370 Thomasson Dr
Naples, FL 34112
900776 9:59AM P Stop f-ime
Odometer
10:1 7AI\/
108094
Attendants: 0 Guests: 0 Mobility: ANIBULATORY Assistance Need:
Daily Pass Sold
Funding Source: ADA
'1 0:3BAN/]
Drop Off
Attendants: 0 Guests: 0 Mobility: AN,1B
Daily Pass Sold
ARBY'S RESTAURANT
2436 Pine Ridge Rd 434-2264
Naples, FL 34109
859606 10:30AM D Stop Time
Odometer
10:3BAll
108102
Assistance Need
Pick Up
Customer Pay
$3.00
841't89 '10:15AM P Stop Time
Odometer
10:54AM
108'1 07
Canceilation
No Show
Complele
Daily Pass Sold
Pick Up
Customer Pay:
$1.00
Daily Pass Sold
ARA-NAPLES DIALYSIS CENTER
4529 Executive Dr 56&7180-(+30 minutes, machine
time)
Naples, FL 34119
7 43152 10:00AM P Stop T'ime
Odometer
11:10AN.4
108109
Cancellation
No Show
Complete
Funding Source: ADA
i&Run By Vehicle Page 4 of 10 Driver Initial:@*",r*rggo.
Funding Source: TDC
10:54AN,4 next to lab corp unit -22
2700 Immokalee Rd unil -22 592-0111
Naples, FL 34109
Funding Source: ADAAttendants: 0 Guests: 0 Mobility: AMB Assistance Need:
Fare Type : Assorted Cash Paid Ahead Return Pay Tickets
11 :10At\.4
Attendants: 0 Guests: 0 [,lobility: CANE Assistance Need:
FareType: Assorted Cash Paid Ahead Return Pay Tickets
97
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 353 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged
Vehicle: 836-Glaval
1844
Driver Name: Yvonne. Rlvera [ 7:13AM - 6:45Plv[ Fott l |Z4|ZOZORun:138 [7:13AM - 6:45PM]
Conf. # Request TimeStop Address Validation lnformation
Pick Up
Customer Pay:
$1.00
ARA-NAPLES DIALYSIS CENTER
4529 Executive Dr 56&718G(+30 minutes, machine
time)
Naples, FL34119
10:00AM P Stop Time
Odometer
11124M
1081 09
Cancellation
No Show
Complete
Attendants: 0 cuests:o Mobility: AN4B
Fare Type; Assorted Cash Paid Ahead
Assistance Need
Return Pay llckets
Funding Source: TDC
'11:3gAM
Drop Off
1320 Sanctuary Rd W
Naples, FL 34120
841189 10:15AM P Stop Ttme
Odometer
Funding Source: ADA
11.39AN.4
108125
Attendants: 0 Guests: 0 N.4obility: Al\,4B
Daily Pass Sold
Assistance Need:
'12:01 PN4
Drop Off
550 Hope Cir #101
lmmokalee, FL 34'142
10:00AM P Stop Time
Odometer
12:01PN.4
108139
Attendants: 0 Guests: 0 Mobility: AMB
Daily Pass Sold
12:1 oPNil
Drop Off
136 Anhinga Cir #3
lmmokalee, FL 34142
7 43152 10:00AM P Stop T'ime
Odometer
12:1 0P N/l
108142
Attendants: 0 Guests: 0 Mobility: CANE Assistance Need Funding Source: ADA
L(}Run By Vehicle Page 5 of 10 Snortervrggn
Stop Time Customer Name
11.124M 741226
Daily Pass Soid
781226
Ass stance Need:Funding Source:TDC
Daily Pass Sold
Driver Initial:98
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 354 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged
BuSr cca-a3115 Rur..t. rr6
zuDE A VEHICLE WITIN THE COORDINATED SYSTEM, REQUEST A
COPY OF THE MANIFEST PAGE TI{AT CONTAINS THIS TzuP.
Date of Observation:l13\,ao)o
Please list any special guests that \4,ere present:
Ox-Srrr Osspnv,\rtoN oF THE Sysrrm
Dov,Location:
Number of Passengers picked up/dropped off
Ambulatory
Non-Ambulatory
Was the driver on time? E Yes o No - How manv minutes late/earlv?
Did the driver provide any passenger assistance? El Yes tr No
Was the driver wearing any identification?A Yes: EI unifo.. D Name Tag
E to oadg" I No
Did the driver render an appropriate greeting?
E[y"r DNo EDriver regularly transports the rider, not necessary
If CTC has a policy on seat belts, did the driver ensure the passengers were properly belted?
dYesE
Was the vehicle neat and clean, and free from dirt, tom upholstery, damaged or broken seats,
protruding metal or other objects? E Yes D No
Is there a sign posted on the interior ofthe vehicle with both a local phone number and the TD
Helpline for comments/complaints/commendations? E Yes E No
Does the vehicle have working heat and air conditioning?E Yes No
Does the vehicle have two-way communications in good working order?tr Yes I No
If used, u,as the lift in good workinS order? \/fi
Page 45
Yes No
No
tr
ED
99
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 355 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
Was there safe and appropriate seating for all passengers?A Yes u No
Did the driver properly use the lift and secure the passenger? \|/fi D Yes E
If No. please explain:
CTC:County:
Date of Ride:
Number of Round Trips Number of Riders/Beneficiaries to Survev0 200 30%
201 - 1200 10%
1201 +5%
Funding Source No.
of Trips
No. of Calls
to Make
No. of
Calls Made
CTD
Medicaid
Other
Other
Other)
Other
Totals
Page 46
Note: Attach the manifest
No
No. of
Riders/Beneficiaries
100
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 356 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
Vehicle: CC2-2345 Run: 115 [ 5:45AM - 6:00Pil[Driver Name; Fredrick . Lyons [ 5:45AM - 6:00PM For: '113112O20
Stop Time Customer Name Stop Address Gonf. # Request Time Validation lnformation
9:4sAM
Drop Off
Attendants: 0 Guests: 0 Mobility: AI\,B
Daily Pass Sold
2650 Airport Pulling Rd S
Naples, FL 34112
884307 9;45AM
6706
Assistance Need:Funding Source: ADA
9:58AM
Pick Up
Customer Pay:
$3.00
Lakewood Manor Care
3601 lakewood blvd Pin 0315
Naples, FL 34112
9:304M P Stop Time
Odometer
9:5BA[I Cancellation
No Show
Complete
Attendants: 0 Guests:0 Nlobility: AMB
Fare Type : Assorted Cash Paid Ahead
Daily Pass Sold
Assistance Need:
Return Pay Tickets
Funding Source: ADA
10:05AM
Drop Off
bank of America
4898 Davis Blvd
Naples, FL 34104
902275 9:30AM P Stop Time
Odometer
10:05Ali1
6709
Attendants: 0 Guests: 0 Mobility: AMB
Daily Pass Sold
Assistance Need:Funding Source: ADA
10r'17AN.4
Pick Up
Customer Pay
$3.00
Atenaanti:--ii
DAVIS KIDNEY CENTER-code#os
6625 HILLWAY ClR. 77r945+(+3O minutes, machine
time)
Naples, FL 341'12
858653 10:00AM P Stop Time
Odomeler
10:174lM
6710
Cancellation
No Show
Complete
Guests: 0
Fare Type: Assorted Cash
Daily Pass Sold
Mobility: AMB
Paid Ahead Return Pay
Assistance Need: Visually lmpaired ILEGALLY
BLIND,NEEDS ASSISTANCE.]
Tickets
Funding Source: ADA
'L
Run By Vehicle Page 4 of 9 Driver Initial S no,,t"lt t.t.
9:30AM D Stop Time
Odometer
902275
101
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 357 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged
Vehicle: CC2-2345 Run: 116 [ 5:4.5AM - 6:00PMl Driver Name: Fredrick. Lyons [ 5:45AM - 6:00PM For:113112020
Stop Time Gustomer Name Stop Address Conf. # Request Time Validation Information
'10:28AM
Drop Off
Attendants: 0 Guests: 0 lvlobility: AIMB
Daily Pass Sold
200 Henley Dr
Naples, FL 34104
10:00AM P Stop Time
Odometer 6713
Pick Up
Customer Pay:
s1.00
Attendants: 0 Guests:o
Comments:SUITE 101
Fare Type : Assorted
Daily Pass Sold
5518 Greenwood Cir. Lot-s Gate code #1922
Naples, FL 34112
9O2OOZ 1:49PM D Stop Time
Odometer
1:03PNI Cancellation
No Show
Complete
6729
Mobility: AMB Assistance Need
Cash Paid Ahead Return Pay Tickets
Funding Sourcei ADA
'1 :31P[4
Drop Off
Attendants: 0 Guests:o lvobility: AMB
Comments:SUITE '101
Daily Pass Sold
Dr. Waynne
1735 Sw Health Pk\,vy
Naples, FL 34109
Assistance Need
9O2OOZ 1:49PM D Stop Time
Odometer
Funding Source: ADA
1:3lPN4
6743
2:'loPM
Pick Up
Customer Pay:
$4.00
ett"noinii' o--'- breils: o
Fare Type: Assorted
Daily Pass Sold
PUBLIX PEBBLE BROOK
15265 COLLTER BLVD. 348-2931
Naples, FL 34119
860822 2:00PM P Stop Time
odometer 67 49
2:10PM Cancellation
No Show
Complete
Nilobility: AIVIB
Cash Paid Ahead
Assistance Need:
Retum Pay Tickets
Funding Source: TDC
;\,Run By Vehicle Driver Initial RouteMatch
Soltware"
10:28A14
Assistance Need: Visually lmpaired ILEGALLY
BLIND,NEEDS ASSISTANCE.I
Funding Source: ADA
858653
1 :03PM
Page 5 of 9102
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 358 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged
BUS: Cca-a3q: RuN,no
zuDE A VEHICLE WITIN THE COORDINATED SYSTEM. REQUEST A
COPY OF THE MANIFEST PAGE TTIAT CONTAINS THIS TRIP.
Date of Observation
Please list any special guests that were present:
ON-SIrr OrsrRvauoN oF THE Sysrplr
zozo
L (t?MA R. CA E 36ot Lq BILocation:
Number of Passengers picked up/dropped off:
Ambulatory
Non-Ambulatory
Was the driver on time?E Yes No - How many minutes late/early?
Did the driver provide any passenger assistance? El Yes No
Was the driver wearing any identification?E Yes: E[ uniforrn E Name Tag
El Io eudg" E No
Did the driver render an appropriate greeting?
EIY". UNo E Drir", regularly transports the rider, not necessary
If CTC has a policy on seat belts, did the driver ensure the passengers were properly belted?
SYesD No
Was the vehicle neat and clean, and free from dirt, tom upholstery, damaged or broken seats,
protruding metal or other objects? E[ y"r E No
Is there a sign posted on the interior ofthe vehicle with both a local phone number and the TD
Helpline for comments/complaints/commendations? E Yes E No
Does the vehicle have *,orking heat and air conditioning?K Yes No
Does the vehicle have two-way communications in good working order? E( Yes No
If used, was the lift in good working order? Ll/A
\
I
Page 45
Yes No
E
E
103
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 359 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
Was there safe and appropriate seating for all passengers? ts Yes E
Didthe driver properly usethe liftand secure the passengert fi/fi E Yes I
If No, please explain:
CTC:County:
Date of fude:
No
No
Funding Sou rce No.
of Trips
No. of
Riders/Beneficiaries
No. of Calls
to Make
No. of
Calls Made
Medicaid
Other)
Other
Totals
Number of Round Trips Number of Riders/Beneficiaries to Suney
0-200 30%
20t -1200 l0o/o
t20l -5%
Page 46
Note: Attach the manifest
CTD
Other
Other
I
104
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 360 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
Vehic,e: CC2-2345 Run: 1'16 [ 5:454M - 6:00P tJ Driver Name: Fredrick . Lyons [ 5:45AM - 6:00PM Foti 'll3'U2O2O
Stop Time Customer Name Stop Address Conf. # Request Time Validation lnformation
9:45Alvl
Drop Off
2650 Airport Pulling Rd S
Naples, FL 34112
9:30AM D Stop Time
Odometer
9:45AM
6706
Attendantsi 0 Guests: 0 Mobility: AMB
Daily Pass Sold
Funding Source: ADA
9:5BAM
Pick Up
Customer Pay;
$3.00
lakewood Manor Care
3601 lakewood blvd Pin 0315
Naples, FL 341 12
9:30AM P Stop Time
Odometer
9:58AM
6707
Cancellation
No Show
Complete
Attendants: 0 Guests:0 Mobility: AMB
Fare Type: Assorted Cash Paid Ahead
Daily Pass Sold
Assislance Need
Return Pay Tickets
Funding Source: ADA
10:05AM
Drop Off
bank of America
4898 Davis Blvd
Naples, FL 34104
902275 9:30AM P Stop Time
Odometer
Funding Source: ADA
'10:05A14
6709
Attendants: 0 Guests: 0 Mobility: AMB
Daily Pass Sold
Assistance Need
10:'1 7AM
Pick Up
Customer Pay:
$3.00
DAVIS KIDNEY CENTER-code#os
6625 HILLWAY ClR. 7719454-(+30 minules, machine
time)
Naples, FL 34.112
858653 lo:ooAM P Slop Time
Odometer
10.'17At{
6710
Cancellation
No Show
Complele
Attendants: 0 Guests: 0
Fare Type: Assoried Cash
Daily Pass Sold
Mobility: AMB
Paid Ahead Return Pay
Assistance Need: Visually lmpaired ILEGALLY
BLIND,NEEDS ASSISTANCE.]
Tickets
Funding Source: ADA
L'Run By Vehicle Page 4 of 9 Driver Initial RouteMatch
Solttare'
884307
Assistance Need:
902275
105
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 361 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged
RIDE A VEHICLE WITIN THE COORDINATED SYSTEM. REQUEST A
COPY OF THE MAMFEST PAGE TFIAT CONTAINS THIS TRIP.
Date of Observation:llztlzozo
Please list any special guests that were present
Or-Srrr OssrRvA.rloN oF THE Sysruu
Location B6t5 3o.ot h'rve
Number of Passengers picked up/dropped off
Ambulatory
Non-Ambulatorv
Was the driver on time? E Yes e No - How many minutes late/earlv?t5 Mrnunes lqte
Didthedriverprovideanypassengerassistance? ( y* E No
El' Y.r, Vunitor.
{roruor" E wo
E Name Tag
Did the driver render an appropriate greeting?
&", E No E Drin.. regularly transports the rider, not necessary
If CTC has a policy on seat belts, did the driver ensure the passengers were properly belted?
E/ v", E
Ifused. was the lift in good working order? \l/ft
No
Was the vehicle neat and clean, and free from dirt. tom upholstery, damaged or broken seats,
protruding metal or other objects? W'y", E No
ls there a sign posted on the interior ofthe vehicle with both a local phone number and the TD
Helpline for comments/complaints/commendations? { V"" tr No
Does the vehicle have working heat and air conditioning? ( r", E No
/
Does the vehicle have two-way communications in good working order? E( Yes tr No
\
Page 45
I Yes t] No
Blh'Cct-zzqs RVN: r\ 6
Was the driver wearing any identification?
106
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 362 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
Was there safe and appropriate seating for all passengers?(Yes No
u Yes I NoDid the driver properly use the lift and secure the passenger?
N/A
If No, please explain:
CTC:County:
Date of Ride:
Number of Round Trips J{umber of Riders/Beneficiaries to Suriey
3lYo
201 1200 10%
l20l +5Yo
Funding Source No.
of Trips
No. of
Riders/Beneficiaries
No. of Calls
to Make
No. of
Calls Made
CTD
Medicaid
Other
Other
Other)
Other
Totals
Page 46
Note: Attach the manifest
E
0-200
107
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 363 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
Driver Name: Fredrick . Lyons [ 5:45AM - 6:0OPM Fot: 1l31lZO2OVehiclq: CC2-2345 Run: 116 [ 5:45AM - 6:00Pft4
Stop Address Validation lnformationStop Time Customer Name
8:17 AM
Drop Off
Attendants: 0 Guests: O Mobility: AMB
WINN DIXIE GOLDEN GATE
4849 Golden Gate Pkwy Unknown
Naples, FL 341'16
Assistance Need
902306 8:04AM P Stop Time
Odometer
8:'l7AM
6693
Funding Source: ADA
8:23AM
Drop Off
Attendants: 0 Guesls: 0 Mobility: AMB
Daily Pass Sold
DAVID LAWRENCE
6075 BATHEY LN. BU|LD|NG C(45r8500)
Naples, FL 34116
902291 8:23AM D Stop Time
Odometer
Funding Source: ADA
8:23AM
6695
8:40AM
Break Start
COLLIER AREA PARA TRANSIT
8300 Radio Rd
Naples, FL 34'104
Stop Time
Odometer
Daily Pass Sold
9:05AM
Break End
COLLIER AREA PARA TRANSIT
8300 Radio Rd
Naples, FL 34'104
Stop Time
Odometer
Daily Pass Sold
9:26Alil
Pick Up
Customer Pay:
!1:oi
Attendants: 0 Guests: 0 Mobility:AMB
Fare Type: Assorted Cash Paid Ahead
8615 Barot Dr #104
Naples, FL 34104
Assistance Need
Return Pay Tickets
884307 9:304M D Stop Time
Odomeler
9:264M
6699
Cancellation
No Show
Complete
Funding Source: ADA
Daily Pass Sold
Run By Vehicle Page 3 of 9 Driver Initial ffi nurt.rvrut.t.
Gonf. # Request Time
Daily Pass Sold
Assistance Need:
1-lr
108
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 364 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged
Driver Name: Fredrick. Lyons [ 5:45AM - 6:00PM Fot: 113'U2o2oRun: 116 [ 5:/t5AM - 6:00PltllVehicle: CC2-2345
Stop Time Customer Name validation lnformationStop Address Conf. # Request Time
9:45A[I
Drop Off
Attendants: 0 Guests: 0 Mobility: AMB
Daily Pass Sold
9:45AM
6706
Funding Source: ADA
Pick Up
Customer Pay
Lakewood Manor Care
3601lakewood blvd Pin 0315
Naples, FL 34112
902275 9:30AM P Stop Time
Odometer 6707
9:58ANi Cancellation
No Show
Complete
$3.00
Attendants: 0 Guests: 0 Nlobility: AMB
Fare Type : Assorted Cash Paid Ahead
Daily Pass Sold
Assistance Need:
Return Pay Tickels
Funding Source: ADA
10:05AM
Drop Off
Attendants: 0 Guests: 0 Mobility: AMB
Daily Pass Sold
bank of America
4898 Davis Blvd
Naples, FL 34'104
902275 9:30AM P Stop Time
Odometer
'10:05AM
6709
Funding Source:ADA
10:'17AN4
Pick Up
Customer Pay
t3.00
Attendants: 0 Guests: 0
Fare Type: Assorted Cash
Dajly Pass Sold
DAVIS KIDNEY CENTER-code#os
6625 HILLWAY ClR 77t945+(+30 minutes' machine
time)
Naples, FL 34112
Assistance Need: Visually lmpaired ILEGALLY
BLIND,NEEDS ASSISTANCE,]
Return Pay Tickets
858653 10:00AM P Stop Time
Odometer 6710
'10:17AM Cancellation
No Show
Complete
Mobili9: AMB
L Paid Ahead
Funding Source: ADA
Page 4 of 9 Driver Initial S n",t.q3,gl
2650 Airport Pulling Rd S
Naples, FL 34112
884307 9:30AM D Stop Time
Odometer
Assistance Need:
9:58AM
Assistance Need:
I
Run By Vehicle 109
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 365 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged
BU5: t0q5 qsp. 16l
RIDE A VEHICLE WITIN THE COORDINATED SYSTEM. REQUEST A
COPY OF THE MAMFEST PAGE T}IAT CONTAINS THIS TRIP.
Date of Observation:llstlzoao
Please list any special guests that were present:
Ox-SIrB OssrnvA,tIoN oF TEE Sysrru
Location:BRAVO A66b Tarnictrn\ tro.,
Number ofPassengers picked up/dropped off:
Ambulatorv
Non-Ambulatory
Was the driver on time? tr Yes No - How many minutes late/early?
Did the driver provide any passenger assistance? K Yes E No
Was the driver wearing any identification?B Yes: I Unifor- O Name Tag
E ID Budg" E No
Did the driver render an appropriate greeting?
E y". O No E Driver regularly transports the rider, not necessary
lf CTC has a policy on seat belts, did the driver ensure the passengers were properly belted?
EYesE No
Was the vehicle neat and clean, and free from dirt, tom upholstery, damaged or broken seats,
protruding metal or other objects? E Yes E No
Is there a sign posted on the interior ofthe vehicle with both a local phone number and the TD
Helpline for comments/complaints/commendations? E Yes O No
Does the vehicle have working heat and air conditioning?Yes No
Does the vehicle have two-way communications in good working order? Yes E
E
No
If used, was the lift in good working order? \/[
E
tr
I
t
Page 45
Yes No
I
I
110
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 366 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
Was there safe and appropriate seating for all passengers?Yes I No
Did the driver properly use the lift and secure the purr.ng"rt 'N/ A Yes E No
If No, please explain:
CTC:County:
Date of Ride:
Number of Round Trips \umber of Riders/Beneficiaries to Survey0 200 30%
201 - 1200 t0%
1201 +
E.
E
Funding Sou rce No.
of Trips
No. of
Riders/Beneficiaries
No. of
Calls Made
CTD
Medicaid
Other
Other
Other)
Othcr
Totals
Page 46
Note: Attach the manifest
No. of Calls
to Make
111
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 367 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
Vehicle: 837-Glaval
't 845
Run: 101 [ 3:00AM - 4:45PMl Driver Name: Andy Ramtahal [ 3:00AM - 4:45Pi4 Foti 1l31l2O2O
Stop Time Customer Name Conf. # Request Time Validation lnformation
2:.12PM 901269BRAVO
2668 Tamiami Trl E
Naples, FL 34112
2:00PM P Stop Time
Odometer
2.12P1\l
101735
Cancellation
No Show
Complete
Pick Up
Customer Pay
$ 1.00
Attendants: 0 Guests: 0 Mobility: AMB Assistance Need:
Comments:SUITE 310
Fare Type : Assorted Cash Paid Ahead Return Pay Tickets
Daily Pass Sold
Funding Source: ADA
2:52PM
Drop Off
448 Golden Gate Blvd W
Naples, FL 34117
Assistance Need
90'1269 2:00PM P Stop Time
Odometer
2:52PM
101752
Daily Pass Sold
lMobility: AN4B Funding Source: ADA
3:11PM
Pick Up
Customer Pay
$1.00
Attendants: 0 Guests: 0 l\.4obility: AMB
Fare Type : Assorted Cash Paid Ahead
Goodwill
8915 Sage Ave Off lmmokalee Rd and Collier Blvd.
Naples, FL 34120
900052 3:10PM P Stop Time
Odometer
Funding Source: TDC
3:11PlM Cancellation
No Show
Complete
Assislance Need:
Return Pay Tickets
3:32PM
Drop Off
Attendants: 0 Guests: 0 Mobility: AMB
3295 Twilight Ln APT 5301 GATECODE- #8S93
Naples, FL 34109
Assistance Need
900052 3:iOPM p Stop Time
Odometer
Funding Source: TDC
3:32PN4
101764
Run By Vehicle Page 10 of 11 Driver Initial $ nort.rvrrt.t
Stop Address
Attendants: 0 Guesls: 0
Comments:SUITE 310
101757
Daily Pass Sold
Daily Pass Sold
(:t 112
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 368 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged
BUS: \BqE RuN. 10\
zuDE A VEHICLE WITIN THE COORDINATED SYSTEM. REQUEST A
COPY OF THE MANIFEST PAGE THAT CONTAINS THIS TRIP.
Date of Obsen ation tllt lzozo
Please list any special guests that were present:
ON-Slu OssrnvatloN oF THE Sysrrn
Dtutt-u r5 ULocation:
Number of Passengers picked up/dropped off:
Ambulatorv
Non-Ambulatory
Was the driver on time?{D No - How many minutes late/early?Yes
Did the driver provide any passenger assistance? {Yes I No
E(Y"r, E}'urifo.. fl Name Tag
B-lD Budg" E No
Did. the driver render an appropriate greeting?
d"., O No E Drir", regularly transports the rider, not necessary
If CTC has a policy on seat belts, did the driver ensure the passengers were properly belted?
dy"" O No
Was the vehicle neat and clean. and free from dirt, tom upholstery, damaged or broken seats,
protruding metal or other objects? El' Yes E No
Is there a sign posted on the interior ofthe vehicle with both a local phone number and the TD
Helpline for comments/complaints/commendations? El/ y"t tr No
Does the vehicle have working heat and air conditioning?{Yes I No
Does the vehicle have two-way communications in good working order? El/ Yes I No
Ifused, was the lift in good working order? 5{if,
I
I
Page 45
E Yes l No
Was the driver wearing any identification?
113
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 369 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
Was there safe and appropriate seating lor all passengers?{NoYesE
Did the driver properly use the lift and secure the passenger? N/A tr yes E No
If No, please explain:
CTC:Counry,:
Date of Ride:
Number of Round Trips Number of Riders/Beneficiaries to Sun'ev
30%
201 - 1200 10o/o
1201 +
Funding Source No.
of Trips
No. of
Riders/Beneficiaries
No. of Calls
to Make
No. of
Calls Made
CTD
Medicaid
Other
Other
Other)
Other
Totals
Page 46
Note: Attach the manifest
0 200
114
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 370 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
Vehicle: B37-Glaval
1845
Run: 101 [ 3:00AM - 4:45Plrtl
Stop Time Customer Name Stop Address Cont. # Request Time Validation lnformation
2:.12PM
Pick Up
Customer Pay:
$r.00
BRAVO
2668 Tamiami Trl E
Naples, FL 34112
2:00PM P Stop Time
Odometer
2:12P1\1
10'1735
Cancellation
No Show
Complete
Attendants: 0 Guests:0 Mobility: AN48 Assistance Need:
Comments: SUITE 310
Fare Type : Assorted Cash Paid Ahead Return Pay Tickets
Funding Source:ADA
2:52PM
Drop Off
448 Golden Gate Blvd W
Naples, FL 34117
901269 2:00PM P Stop Time
Odometer
2:52PM
1017 52
Attendants: 0 Guests: 0 Mobility: AMB
Comments: SUITE 310
Daily Pass Sold
Assistance Need:Funding Source:ADA
3:'1 1PM
Pick Up
Customer Pay:
$1.00
Goodwill
8915 Sage Ave Off lmmokalee Rd and Collier Blvd.
Naples, FL 34120
900052 3:10PM P Stop Time
Odometer
3:11P1/
101757
Cancellation
No Show
Complete
Attendants: O Guests:0 Mobility: AMB
Fare Type : Assorted Cash Paid Ahead
Daily Pass Sold
Assistance Need
Return Pay Tickets
Funding Source: TDC
3:32PM
Drop Off
3295 Twilight Ln APT 5301 GATECODE- #8993
Naples, FL 34109
9000s2 3:'10PM P Stop Time
Odometer
3:32PN4
101764
Attendants: 0 Guests:o fiIobility: AMB
Daily Pass Sold
Assistance Need Funding Source:TDC
0t Run By Vehicle Page 10 of 11 Driver Initial:,ffi,no.rt.tvt t.t.
Driver Name: Andy Ramtahal [ 3:00AM - 4:45PIr[] For: 1l31l2O2O
901269
115
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 371 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged
Ox-Srrr OnssnvarroN oF THE Sysrnlr
RIDE A VEHICLE WITIN TI{E COORDINATED SYSTEM. REQUEST A
COPY OF THE MANIFEST PAGE THAT CONTAINS THIS TRIP.
Date of Observation
Please list any special guests that were present:
a3
Location:a33Y UEENS
Number of Passengers picked up/dropped off:
Ambulatory
Non-Ambulatory
Was the driver on time? tr Yes E No - How many minutes late/early?
E rninrrtes lqte
Did the driver provide any passenger assistance? E Yes E No
Was the driver wearing any identification?EI Yes: El Unifo.m E Name Tag
E Io g"dg" E uo
Did the driver render an appropriate greeting?
[V". ENo E Driver regularly transports the rider, not necessary
If CTC has a policy on seat belts, did the driver ensure the passengers were properly belted?
EYesENo
Was the vehicle neat and clean, and free from dirt, tom upholstery, damaged or broken seats,
protruding metal or other objecrs? E Yes tr No
Is there a sign posted on the interior of the vehicle with both a local phone number and the TD
Helpline for comments/complaints/commendations? E yes tr No
Does the vehicle have working heat and air conditioning?
Does the vehicle have two-way communications in good working order? Yes
tr
E
E
Yes D No
No
Ifused, was the lift in good working order? frl I
I
I
Page 45
A Yes O No
I
116
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 372 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
Was there safe and appropriate seating for all passengers?BYestrNo
Did the driver properly use the lift and secure the passenger? \/[o Yes
If No, please explain:
CTC:County:
Date of Ride:
Number of Round Tri ps Number of Riders/Beneficiaries to Survey
0-200 30o/o
20t - 1200 't0%
l20l +5%
No
Funding Source No.
of Trips
No. of
Riders/Beneficiaries
No. of Calls
to Make
No. of
Calls Made
CTD
Medicaid
Other
Other
Other)
Other
Totals
Page 46
Note: Attach the manifest
I
117
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 373 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
Vehicle: 830-Glaval
1117
Run: 101 [ 4:35AM - 4:06P I Driver Name: Andy Ramtahal [ 4:35AM - 4:06Pi,tl For: 112312020
Stop Time Customer Name Stop Address Conf. # Request Time Validation lnformation
9:32AM
Daily Pass Sold
4559 Boabadilla St
Naples, FL 34103
B9BB95 10:00AM D Stop Time
Odometer
9:32AM
222897
Cancellation
No Show
Complete
Funding Source: ADA
9:47AM
Drop Off
Attendants: 0 Guests: 0 Mobility: AMB
Daily Pass Sold
Pavillion Plaza
833 Vanderbilt Beach Rd THEATERy MOVIES
Naples, FL 34108
Assistance Need:
898895 9:47ANI
222901
10:17AM
Pick Up
Customer Pay:
$1.00
Attendants: 0 Guests: 0 lvlobility: AN,IB
Fare Type: Assorted Cash Paid Ahead
Daily Pass Sold
2334 Queens Way
Naples, FL 34112
859606 l0:30AM D Stop Time
Odometer
10:17AM
222913
Cancellation
No Show
Complete
Assistance Need
Return Pay Tickets
Funding Source: TDC
10.35Alvl
Drop Off
Attendantsi 0 Guests: 0 Mobility: AN48
Daily Pass Sold
ARBY'S RESTAURANT
2436 Pine Ridge Rd 43+2264
Naples, FL 34109
859606 10:35AM
222921
Assistance Need:Funding Source: TDC
Run By Vehicle Page 6 cf 8 Driver Initial $ o.,,.n13,yg
Pick Up
Customer Pay:
, _$1.90
Attendants: 0 Guesls: 0 Nlobility: AMB Assistance Need:
Fare Type : Assorted Cash Paid Ahead Return Pay Tickets
10:00AM D Stop Time
Odometer
Funding Source: ADA
10:30AM D Stop Time
Odometer
118
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 374 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged
BU5:l8q5 RUN:\ol
RIDE A VEHICLE MTIN THE COORDINATED SYSTEM. REQUEST A
COPY OF T}IE MAMFEST PAGE TT{AT CONTAINS THIS TRIP.
Date of Observation ?ozo
Please list any special guests that were present
Ox-Srru Orsnnvl.rroN oF THE Sysrpu
Location:tlome D RESI DEN CL,11O Crodtette fi
Number of Passengers picked up/dropped off
Ambulatory
Non-Ambulatory
Was the driver on time? Ul Yes No - How many minutes late/early?
Did the driver provide any passenger assistance? (Yes E No
Was the driver wearing any identification?{ Y"", E/unifor- O Name Tag
E}fo audg" E No
Did the driver render an appropriate greeting?
&", ENo E Driver regularly transports the rider, not necessary
If CTC has a policy on seat belts, did the driver ensure the passengers were properly belted?
EyesE No
Was the vehicle neat and clean, and free from dirt, torn upholstery, damaged or broken seats,
protruding metal or other objects? E Yes tr No
Is there a sign posted on the interior ofthe vehicle with both a local phone number and the TD
Helpline for comments/complaints/commendations? E Yes E No
Does the vehicle have working heat and air conditioning?E yes No
Does the vehicle have two-way communications in good working order? E Yes tr No
lf used, was the lift in good working order?
E
I
I
Page 45
El Yes No
I
I
119
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 375 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
Was there safe and appropriate seating for all passengers?
Did the driver properly use the lift and secure the passenger?
If No. please explain:
{r* E No
{""" n No
CTC Countv:
Date of Ride:
Number of Round Trips \umber of Riders/Beneficiaries to Suney
0-200 30o/o
201 r200 l0o/o
l20l +5Yo
Funding Source No.
of Trips
No. of
Riders/Beneficiaries
No. of Calls
to Make
No. of
Calls Made
CTD
Medicaid
Other
Other
Other)
Other
Totals
Page 46
Note: Attach the manifest
120
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 376 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
Vehicle: B37-Glaval
1845
Run: 101 [ 3:00A1, - 4]45PHl Ddver Nam6: Andy Ramtahal [ 3:00Am - 4:45P I Fori 11311'IZO2O
Stop Tlme Customer Namo Stop Addr€sr Gonl. # Requeet Tlme Valld8tlon lnformation
12',tsPM
Break Slart
COLLIER AREA PARA TRANSIT
8300 Radio Rd
Naples, FL 34104
Stop Time
Odometer
Daily Pass Sold
'12:45PM
Break End
COLLIER AREA PARA TRANSIT
8300 Radio Rd
Naples. FL 34104
Stop Time
Odometer
Daily Pass Sold
1:40PM
Pick Up
Customer Pay;
$3.00
HOMEWOOD RESIDENCE
770 Goodletle Rd N
Naples, FL 34102
901644 l:00PM P Stop Time
Odometer
1:4OPM
101729
Cancellation !
No Show
Complele
Attendants: 0 Guests: 0 Mobility: WHEELCHAIR Assistance Need
Fare Type : Assorted Cash Paid Ahead Retum Pay Tlckets
Daily Pass Sold
Funding Source: ADA
2:01PM
Drop Off
1007 Roseate Dr
Naples, FL 34104
901644 1:00PM P Stop Time
Odometer
2:O1PM
10'1733
Attendants: 0 Guests: 0 Mobility; WHEELCHAIR Assistance Need:
Daily Pass Sold
Funding Source:ADA
.i. ,l: il
1_
Run By Vehicle Page 9 of 11 Driver Initial:ffi^',r.rg;*.121
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 377 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged
Rider/Beneficiary Survey
Number of trips 01/24/2020: 396
Number of rider/beneficiary surveys obtained: 40
Funding
ADA: 30 TDC: 10
1. Where you charged an amount in addition to the co-payment?
No: 40
Note: 3 respondents did indicate they had to make driver check again when
they were being charged more than their co-payment should be.
2. How often do you normally obtain transportation?
1-2 Times/Week: 7 3-5 Times/Week: 30 Daily 7 Days/Week: 3
Other: 1 Don’t use anymore
3.Have you ever been denied transportation?
Yes: 4 (1-2 Times, Space not available) No: 36
4. What do you normally use the service for?
Type of use Number of respondent’s answers
Medical 14
Employment 5
Nutritional 5
Education/Training/Day Care 10
Life-Sustaining/Other 8
122
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 378 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
5. Did you have a problem with your trip
No: 10
Yes: 30 comments summarized below comments that were similar in nature were
united and some respondents had multiple problems with the trip.
11 Late pick-up (60 Minutes, new driver, gets person into a panic when have not
been picked up and know will be late to appointment).
12 Late return pick-up 1 hour or more (One respondent indicated it had been 2
hours wait sometimes but has gotten better recently).
6 Pick-up times not convenient, late specifically with newer drivers too early or too
late.
1 Driver went to wrong place to pick me up.
1 Getting call returned after leaving several messages.
1 I did miss medical appointment once.
1 Trip scheduled in error.
1 Late to an appointment/Failed to be picked-up.
1 Reservation had time incorrect.
1 A driver who was mad that he had to help my husband with his seat b elt again.
Provided complaint to operator. I imagine this was resolved has not happened
again.
1 Rude reservationist.
123
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 379 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
6. On a scale of 1 to 10 (10 bring most satisfied) rate the transportation you
have been receiving.
Average of all 40 respondents: Rating of 8.5
Table below shows the number of respondents that chose each specific rating
number used to calculate the average rating of 8.5.
Rating Number of
respondents chose
specific rating
1 1
4 2
5 1
6 3
7 1
8 9
8.5 3
9 3
9.5 2
10 10
7. What does transportation mean to you?
-Enables daughter to get where she needs to go when I can't drive her.
-Independence. Satisfies all needs.
-Very Important.
-Means a lot. Can't drive if I didn't have this service I would not do anything
or be able to go anywhere I need to go. Glad to have it.
-Very Important can't drive would not be able to go anywhere without it.
-Everything. With so many people I have to take care of this allows my son
to go to school.
-Means so much to have independence when my household only has one car.
124
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 380 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
-Could not get around without it. Can't drive so would have no oth er way to
get to doctor’s appointment without it.
-My life can't get around without it. My lifeline.
-Everything. I have no idea where I would get anywhere without it. Could not
live without it. Hope it can continue forever.
-Only way to go to doctor. Glad to have it. Improves quality of life.
-Lifeline. No other way to get around.
-Grateful to have it.
-Whether or not I can get out of my community beyond the weekend when
my daughter can take me. Freedom, independence, and saves me money
having a fixed income and improves quality of financials.
-A battle to go to treatment if I did not have this service.
-Great help freeing up family members.
-Independence. Could not get to store or afford to pay any other form of
transportation. Depend on it 100% and have no other back up.
-Great help. Benefits to move around county.
-Provides independence to my daughter.
-Very valuable with very polite drivers that are skilled and ready to help.
-Disabled driver licensed gats me from point A to point B.
-Love the paratransit bus after my accident.
-Allows me to go out and have a better quality of life. I cannot take the city
bus.
-Guaranteed mobility.
-Means a lot. Am in no condition to drive after medical appointment. Takes a
lot out of me.
-Tremendous help. A way to get around without my wife having to change
her schedule.
125
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 381 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
-Life can't move anywhere without it.
-Very important can't stand at the bus stop due to my condition or stand under
full sun.
-So helpful for people after dialysis.
-Great help.
-Independence.
-Quality of life.
-Use for getting to work and back.
-Enjoy getting home in a timely manner.
-I would not be able to drive my husband to get the care he requires for his
Alzheimer’s.
-Means a lot couldn't get around without it. Best thing to happen to Naples.
-Can go where I need to go for a reasonable price.
Additional Comments:
-All great drivers
-Receptionists are doing a wonderful job.
-Have been late for school twice
-Have experienced reservation errors once and a while. Have had to wait
more than 2 hours for a pickup and sometimes informed that buses will only
be going to my area after 6:00 PM.
-I work so this is very helpful. They are respectful with my son and his
condition and when he forgets and when he gets down.
-Reservation error has occurred
-For return pick up the bus had not come called and was told that the bus was
on the way should be there in about 10 minutes. Seems like the person did
not actually check because after waiting some more called and was informed
126
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 382 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
the driver did not have me in their route scheduled. So, had to wait some
more for a bus to pick me up. Better communication between person on
phone and driver needed.
-Get a call when they are falling behind
-Like to be called when bus will be late
-Great if there is a way to go through email or app to be able to schedule,
cancel or see schedule to confirm to reduce phone calls.
-Improve system call and information on pickup window. Think they are late
but then they say they are within their pickup window.
-No notice of early pick up is given has happened twice already and am told
if I am not ready at that time then I will not be able to go at all.
-My trust has gone down on the service. Lately have not been getting me to
where I need to go on time. Not being able to get to a place on time was
making me feel worse so lately I have been relying on having to pay Uber or
neighbors for certain time sensitive trips. In the past had newer drivers
asking me where we are going when I am not really able to guide them,
waited forever so I am glad they started using GPS more, as newer drivers
that get lost take up more time each trip. Last month had a class that was
over by the time I got there.
-Sometimes late picking up.
-Information on how to give drivers permission to assist riders in situations
where more than a step up is involved should be provided as part of the
application or interview process.
-Very polite, nice and sweet drivers. Great and try to do the best they can
-Frustration from side pick-ups where a person does not cancel ahead of time
and it delays the trip to get to the destination. Not fair to does who are
responsible and cancel their trips within the given period of time.
127
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 383 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
-Do have some issues with waiting long 2-3 hours and no one answers or
obtain a notification of how long I will be waiting.
-Pick up times can be better.
-Bus drivers great. Very gentle take my bag up and down to my door. I really
appreciate their help.
-One of the drivers goes fast in my condominium. The speed limit is 15 mph
and there are speed bumps but still goes faster than should.
-It would be of great help if transport chairs would be allowed on the bus
would be easier for my wife once I get off the bus are smaller and not as
heavy to carry.
-Excellent drivers very courteous
-Love all the drivers.
-When I call no one answers and have no idea if they even listen to my
message.
-Communication with drivers and dispatchers needs to be better
-Am picked up at 5:30 AM for a 7:00 AM scheduled pick up.
-Better communication calls me to tell me they are here. Driver came to pick
me up and didn't ask my name and then left. Pickup late sometimes and one
time I called after 1 o'clock asking about my bus I was told they were
looking for a bus for me. Waited for hours and didn't have a way home.
Don't use it for anything else because never know when they are going to
come so have someone take me.
-Very polite drivers.
-Runs late once and a while. Sometimes they pick us up as a group and then
sometimes one by one might be more efficient to pick us up all at the same
time.
128
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 384 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
-Stopped using the service would make me too nervous that I would never
make it to my medical appointments on time and this would make my pain
even worse. On one trip I got picked up the 5 minutes after my meeting was
supposed to start even when booking an hour prior to the meeting. Poor
scheduling and the scheduling agent was rude to me. Spoke with
management to see if things would improve but never did. When I called the
number, I could never get anyone on the phone felt like they were avoiding
my calls. Buses said they would come but never did.
129
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 385 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
Page 52
Level of Cost
Worksheet 1
Insert Cost page from the AOR.
130
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 386 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
09/10/2019 01:49 PM Page 25 of 25
County: Collier Demographics Number
CTC: Collier County Board of County Commissioners
Contact: Michelle E. Arnold Total County Population 372,880
3299 TAMIAMI TRAIL E #103
NAPLES, FL 34112 Unduplicated Head Count 4,139
239-252-5841
Email: michellearnold@colliergov.net Trips By Type of Service 2017 2018 2019 Vehicle Data 2017 2018 2019
Fixed Route (FR) 0 0 0 Vehicle Miles 1,351,040 1,407,704 2,224,740
Deviated FR 0 0 0 Roadcalls 17 20 116
Complementary ADA 0 0 77,945 Accidents 11 9 23
Paratransit 114,744 109,623 39,640 Vehicles 29 29 70
TNC 0 0 0 Drivers 44 66 67
Taxi 0 0 0 School Board (School Bus) 0 0 0 Volunteers 0 0 0 TOTAL TRIPS 114,744 109,623 117,585 Passenger Trips By Trip Purpose Financial and General Data
Medical 51,839 50,069 43,133 Expenses $4,614,372 $5,433,226 $5,818,222
Employment 13,043 12,874 14,256 Revenues $4,828,842 $4,931,076 $5,211,529
Ed/Train/DayCare 3,445 4,097 16,982 Commendations 1 6 2
Nutritional 13,700 13,868 14,907 Complaints 27 65 43
Life-Sustaining/Other 32,717 28,715 28,307 Passenger No-Shows 499 2,821 4,135
TOTAL TRIPS 114,744 109,623 117,585 Unmet Trip Requests 23 199 16 Passenger Trips By Revenue Source Performance Measures
CTD 24,408 18,917 27,232 Accidents per 100,000 Miles 0.81 0.64 1.03
AHCA 0 0 3,626 Miles between Roadcalls 79,473 70,385 19,179
APD 0 0 0 Avg. Trips per Passenger 97.74 83.30 28.41
DOEA 332 319 96 Cost per Trip $40.21 $49.56 $49.48
DOE 0 0 0 Cost per Paratransit Trip $40.21 $49.56 $49.48
Other 90,004 90,387 86,631 Cost per Total Mile $3.42 $3.86 $2.62
TOTAL TRIPS 114,744 109,623 117,585 Cost per Paratransit Mile $3.42 $3.86 $2.62 Trips by Provider Type
CTC 0 0 0 Transportation Operator 102,424 103,178 105,273 Coordination Contractor 12,320 6,445 12,312 TOTAL TRIPS 114,744 109,623 117,585
131
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 387 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged
Page 53
Level of Competition
Worksheet 2
1. Inventory of Transportation Operators in the Service Area
Column A
Operators
Available
Column B
Operators
Contracted in the
System.
Column C
Include Trips
Column D
% of all Trips
Private Non-Profit
Private For-Profit
Government
Public Transit
Agency
Total
2. How many of the operators are coordination contractors?
3. Of the operators included in the local coordinated system, how many have the capability
of expanding capacity?
Does the CTC have the ability to expand?
4. Indicate the date the latest transportation operator was brought into the system.
5. Does the CTC have a competitive procurement process?
6. In the past five (5) years, how many times have the following methods been used in
selection of the transportation operators?
Low bid Requests for proposals
Requests for qualifications Requests for interested parties
Negotiation only
Which of the methods listed on the previous page was used to select the current
operators?
132
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 388 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
Page 54
7. Which of the following items are incorporated in the review and selection of
transportation operators for inclusion in the coordinated system?
Capabilities of operator Scope of Work
Age of company Safety Program
Previous experience Capacity
Management Training Program
Qualifications of staff Insurance
Resources Accident History
Economies of Scale Quality
Contract Monitoring Community Knowledge
Reporting Capabilities Cost of the Contracting Process
Financial Strength Price
Performance Bond Distribution of Costs
Responsiveness to Solicitation Other: (list)
8. If a competitive bid or request for proposals has been used to select the transportation
operators, to how many potential operators was the request distributed in the most
recently completed process?
How many responded?
The request for bids/proposals was distributed:
Locally Statewide Nationally
9. Has the CTC reviewed the possibilities of competitively contracting any services other
than transportation provision (such as fuel, maintenance, etc…)?
133
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 389 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
Page 55
Level of Availability (Coordination)
Worksheet 3
Planning – What are the coordinated plans for transporting the TD population?
Public Information – How is public information distributed about transportation services in
the community?
Certification – How are individual certifications and registrations coordinated for local TD
transportation services?
Eligibility Records – What system is used to coordinate which individuals are eligible for
special transportation services in the community?
134
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 390 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
Page 56
Reservations – What is the reservation process? How is the duplication of a reservation
prevented?
Trip Allocation – How is the allocation of trip requests to providers coordinated?
Scheduling – How is the trip assignment to vehicles coordinated?
Call Intake – To what extent is transportation coordinated to ensure that a user can reach a
Reservationist on the first call?
135
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 391 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
Page 57
Dispatching – How is the real time communication and direction of drivers coordinated?
General Service Monitoring – How is the overseeing of transportation operators
coordinated?
Daily Service Monitoring – How are real-time resolutions to trip problems coordinated?
Transport – How are the actual transportation services and modes of transportation
coordinated?
136
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 392 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
Page 58
Trip Reconciliation – How is the confirmation of official trips coordinated?
Billing – How is the process for requesting and processing fares, payments, and reimbursements
coordinated?
Reporting – How is operating information reported, compiled, and examined?
Cost Resources – How are costs shared between the coordinator and the operators (s) in order
to reduce the overall costs of the coordinated program?
137
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 393 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
Page 59
Information Resources – How is information shared with other organizations to ensure
smooth service provision and increased service provision?
Overall – What type of formal agreement does the CTC have with organizations, which provide
transportation in the community?
138
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 394 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
APPENDIX B
PTNE Response to
2020 CTC Evaluation
139
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 395 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
Memorandum
To: Brandy Otero, Collier MPO Principal Planner
Josephine Medina, MPO Senior Planner
From: Omar Deleon, Transit Manager
Date: March 17, 2020
Subject: Response to 2020 CTC Evaluation
The Public Transit & Neighborhood Enhancement (PTNE) Division is in receipt of the CTC Evaluation
Workbook for the review period of July 1, 2018 through June 30, 2019. We have reviewed the report and
corresponding commends and recommendations and have the following response for your consideration.
Review the CTC contracts for compliance with 427.0155(1), F.S. - “Execute uniform contracts for service
using a standard contract, which includes performance standards for operators.”
Comments:
The CTC is in compliance with this section.
Review the CTC last AOR submittal for compliance with 427. 0155(2) - “Collect Annual Operating Data
for submittal to the Commission.”
Comments:
The CTC is in compliance with this section. The CTC submits all reports and agreements on time. No
recommendation for improvements is needed in this area.
Review the CTC monitoring of its transportation operator contracts to ensure compliance with
427.0155(3), F.S. - “Review all transportation operator contracts annually.”
Comments:
The CTC is in compliance with this section.
Review the TDSP to determine the utilization of school buses and public transportation services
[Chapter 427.0155(4)] - “Approve and coordinate the utilization of school bus and public transportation
services in accordance with the TDSP.”
Comments:
School buses are not utilized in the coordinated system.
Rule 41-2.012(5)(b): "As part of the Coordinator’s performance, the local Coordinating Board shall also
set an annual percentage goal increase for the number of trips provided within the system for ridership
on public transit, where applicable. In areas where the public transit is not being utilized, the local
Coordinating Board shall set an annual percentage of the number of trips to be provided on public
transit."
140
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 396 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
Comments:
Although Goal 2 of the TDSP is to "Maximize effective transfer of individuals from paratransit to fixed
route services." This does not provide a specific annual percentage increase to be obtained. This item
should be addressed during the next major TDSP update to ensure compliance.
Findings:
There are no compliance issues found with Chapter 427.
Recommendations:
A mobility manager conducts eligibility reviews to determine if the fixed route system can be utilized. The
CTC is encouraged to continue the transfer of individuals to the fixed route system whenever possible to
minimize paratransit costs. The TDSP should be revised during the next major update to include a specific
annual percentage goal to transfer passengers from paratransit to transit.
CTC Response:
The transportation disadvantaged individuals that are utilizing paratransit that might be able to use Fixed
Route are doing so because Fixed Route is not available in the area of their origin or destination. Although
the CTC agrees that all effort should be made to transfer individuals to the fixed route system to minimize
costs, setting an annual percentage goal may not be achievable without the expansion of fixed route
service into other areas of the County.
The CTC will work with the LCB to determine a reasonable performance measure that is consistent with
Rule 41-2.012(5)(b) which is intended to increase the usage of public transit not necessarily transferring
trips from paratransit to fixed route.
Compliance with 41-2.006(1), Minimum Insurance Compliance - “...ensure compliance with the
minimum liability insurance requirement of $100,000 per person and $200,000 per incident…”
Comments:
The CTC maintains compliance with the minimum liability insurance requirements as directed by, F.A.C
41-2.006.
Compliance with 41-2.011(2), Evaluating Cost-Effectiveness of Coordination Contractors and
Transportation Alternatives. - “...contracts shall be reviewed annually by the Community
Transportation Coordinator and the Coordinating Board as to the effectiveness and efficiency of the
Transportation Operator or the renewal of any Coordination Contracts.”
Findings:
The CTC is in compliance with this rule.
Recommendations:
None noted
141
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 397 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
Compliance with Commission Standards - “...shall adhere to Commission approved standards…”
TDSP Commission Standards
Commission Standards Comments Response
Local toll-free phone number
must be posted in all
vehicles.
The TDSP addresses this standard.
All vehicles inspected as part of
this evaluation were found in
compliance. It is however
suggested that the number should
be posted in larger font for greater
visibility to the service users.
No response required
Vehicle Cleanliness The TDSP addresses this standard.
All vehicles as part of this
evaluation inspected were clean
and free of damaged or broken
seats.
No response required
Passenger/Trip Database The TDSP addresses this standard.
The CTC management entity will
collect and store in a database the
name, phone number, address,
funding source, eligibility, and
special requirements of each
passenger.
No response required
Adequate seating The TDSP addresses this standard.
Vehicle seating will not exceed the
manufacturer’s recommended
capacity. All vehicles as part of this
evaluation maintained adequate
seating.
No response required
Driver Identification The TDSP addresses this standard.
All observed during this evaluation
had uniforms on, announced
themselves and greeted the
passengers at their door.
Although the TDSP states that all
drivers are to have a name badge
displayed at all times, it was noted
that during one of the evaluations
there was a driver that did not
have their identification badge
visible.
No response required
Passenger Assistance The TDSP addresses this standard.
All drivers observed during this
evaluation provided assistance as
needed.
No response required
142
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 398 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
Smoking, Eating and Drinking The TDSP addresses this standard.
There will be no smoking on any
vehicles in the coordinated
system. Eating and drinking on
board the vehicle is prohibited.
Exceptions are permitted when
required due to an existing
medical condition.
No response required
Two-way Communications The TDSP addresses this standard.
All vehicles observed as part of this
evaluation were equipped with
two-way communication in good
working order.
No response required
Air Conditioning/Heating The TDSP addresses this standard.
Air conditioning was working in all
vehicles observed. Due to the
temperature, the heat was not
tested.
No response required
Billing Requirements The TDSP requires that all
payments to transportation
subcontractors will be made in a
timely manner pursuant to Florida
Statutes. All bills shall be paid
within 7 working days to
subcontractors, after receipt of
said payment by the Community
Transportation Coordinator, in
accordance with Section 287.0585,
F.S.
CAT currently does not have a
subcontractor providing service
for CAT Connect.
Findings:
The TDSP complies with all Commission standards.
Recommendations:
The CTC is encouraged to post the local toll-free number in all vehicles in larger font for greater visibility
to the service users.
The CTC is encouraged to review and ensure that drivers have ID badges displayed at all times.
CTC Response:
A standard font size of 72 has been established for the posting of the toll-free number in all vehicles. Signs
have been obtained for those vehicles with signs that did not meet that standard and they have been
replaced.
The Vendor contract requires all drivers to be in full uniform when providing transportation service, which
includes displaying his/her ID. We will require the General Manager and Training Manager to review the
policy with all drivers at their safety meeting and require proof of driver attendance. CAT will conduct
143
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 399 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
period inspections to ensure vendor is adhering to this policy. The vendor will be assessed Liquidated
Damages each time a driver is found to be out of uniform.
Compliance with Local Standards - “...shall adhere to Commission approved standards...”
TDSP Local Standards
Local Standards Comments Response
Transport of Escorts and
dependent children policy
The TDSP addresses this standard.
Personal care attendants must be
approved on initial customer
application with medical
documentation for reason
attendant is needed. If an escort/
personal care attendant is
requested, they will be transported
at no additional charge.
The CAT Connect Rider’s Guide
reinforces this standard.
Use, Responsibility, and cost
of child restraint devices
The TDSP addresses this standard.
Restraints are required for children
under 5 and/or under 50 lbs.
The CAT Connect Rider’s Guide
reinforces this standard.
Out-of-Service Area trips The CTC does not provide any trips
outside of Collier County.
No response required
CPR/1st Aid The TDSP addresses this standard.
Drivers are certified in CPR every
two years (biennial).
The Vendor Contract reinforces
this standard.
Driver Criminal Background
Screening
The TDSP addresses this standard.
All drivers in the coordinated
system must have a “favorable”
background check from the Florida
Department of Law Enforcement
(“favorable” as defined by the
Department of Children and
Families policies and procedures).
The Vendor Contract reinforces
this standard.
Rider Personal Property The TDSP addresses this standard.
Passengers are allowed to bring up
to four shopping bags that fit under
the passenger’s seat and/or on
their lap.
The CAT Connect Rider’s Guide
reinforces this standard.
Advance reservation
requirements
The TDSP addresses this standard.
Reservations are taken a day in
advance up to 5 p.m. the business
day prior to the trip request.
Passengers with an urgent need to
travel should call the CTC. Unless
other regulations are applicable,
same day trip requests cannot be
The CAT Connect Rider’s Guide
reinforces this standard.
144
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 400 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
guaranteed. However, the CTC will
attempt to accommodate the
request.
Pick-up Window TDSP addresses this standard. For
the focus of this evaluation the 30
minutes early to zero minute late
medical and employment policy
was reviewed for trips. Effective
12-04-2019 the LCB approved a
negotiated methodology for trips
based on a mileage-based
scheduling. The TDSP will be
amended to include the updated
window policy.
The CAT Connect Rider’s Guide
reinforces this standard.
Findings:
As mentioned above, the scheduling methodology of assigning trips changed from zoned based trip
assignments with 1-hour and 2-hour windows to negotiated mileage-based trip assignments.
A complete review of manifests for the day of 01/24/2020 was completed as part of this evaluation. Due
to recent changes to how trips are assigned only the pick-up window standard that states that medical
appointments and employment must follow the "30 minute early to zero minute late" policy was used to
evaluate. Based on this standard on time performance for all the trips this day was calculated to be 92%,
the on time performance for trips categorized as work and medical drop off trips that day was calculated
to be 61%, the on time performance for trips categorizes only as medical drop off trips that day was
calculated to be 57%, and the on time performance for trips categorized as employment that day was
calculated to be 76%. The manifest identified one patient as being dropped off 44 minutes after their
requested drop off time and another two patients being dropped off 72 minutes early from their
requested drop off time.
Recommendations:
The on-time performance for medical and employment continues to be an issue. During the annual public
workshop meeting the STARability Foundation indicated various of its participants at various locations are
being picked up or dropped off late sometimes by hours at a time and requested a better method of
communicating with families when buses will be late. Comments from rider surveys also mention late
drop off and pick up times for medical and employment as being issues. Three respondents indicated a
heightened level of stress of not knowing whether they would get to their destinations on time. One of
these three respondents is no longer using the service for this reason and another respondent indicated
that they are paying Uber or a friend to get them to their destination and only using the service for trips
that are not time sensitive. Other comments included that they are not being notified of tardiness, and
vehicle issues or being notified hours after an issue has occurred which does not allow them to find an
alternative way home. Comments also indicated they are having issues with the incorrect scheduling of
their trips.
The CTC is encouraged to provide in their quarterly report to the LCB the on-time performance for medical
and employment trips individually not just as part of the overall on time performance for all trips. It is also
145
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 401 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
encouraged that they provide a quarterly report to the LCB on measures that are being done to help
address these issues with on time performance.
The CTC is encouraged to devise a system to inform passengers of when their driver would be arriving and
to confirm scheduling information for their trips. The CTC is encouraged to pursue the phone system to
enhance customer service.
In the next TDSP update service standard changes due to new trip assignment methodology should be
reflected in Pick-Up Window and return trip scheduling.
CTC Response:
CAT made contact with the individuals that attended the Annual Public Workshop in an effort to schedule
an appointment to discuss the issues raised. However, do to the COVID-19 Pandemic the meeting was
not scheduled. Attempts to schedule a meeting will be done when business is back to normal.
The PTNE Division is evaluating the acquisition of a system to remind passengers of their trips as well as
alert them when the driver has arrived. An improved phone system is also being explored.
Summary Remarks
The PTNE Division appreciates the feedback provided and will make every effort to comply with the
recommendations in the future.
146
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 402 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
APPENDIX C
CTD RATE MODEL
WORKSHEET
FY 2020-2021
147
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 403 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Minor Update)
Worksheet for Multiple Service Rates CTC:Collier County B Version 1.4
1.Answer the questions by completing the GREEN cells starting in Section I for all services County:Collier County
2.Follow the DARK RED prompts directing you to skip or go to certain questions and sections based on previous answers
SECTION I: Services Provided
1 Ambulatory 1 Wheelchair 2 Stretcher 1 Group
1.Yes Yes Yes Yes
No No No No
Go to Section II
for Ambulatory
Service
Go to Section II
for Wheelchair
Service
STOP! Do NOT
Complete
Sections II - V
for Stretcher
Service
Go to Section II
for Group
Service
SECTION II: Contracted Services
1 Ambulatory 1 Wheelchair 2 Stretcher 1 Group
1.Will the CTC be contracting out any of these Services TOTALLY in the upcoming budget year?....Yes Yes Yes Yes
No No No No
Answer # 2 for
Ambulatory
Service
Answer # 2 for
Wheelchair
Service
Do Not
Complete
Section II for
Stretcher
Service
Answer # 2 for
Group Service
2.2 Yes 2 Yes 2 Yes 2 Yes
No No No No
Leave Blank Leave Blank
Do NOT
Complete
Section II for
Stretcher
Service Leave Blank
3.If you answered YES to #1 & #2 above, how much is the proposed contract amount for the service?-$
How many of the total projected Passenger Miles relate to the contracted service?0
How many of the total projected passenger trips relate to the contracted service? 0
Effective Rate for Contracted Services:Ambulatory Wheelchair Stretcher Group
per Passenger Mile =
per Passenger Trip =
Go to Section III
for Ambulatory
Service
Go to Section III
for Wheelchair
Service
Do NOT
Complete
Section II for
Stretcher
Service
Go to Section III
for Group
Service
4.If you answered # 3 & want a Combined Rate per Trip PLUS a per Mile add-on for 1 or more Combination Trip and Mile Rate
services, INPUT the Desired per Trip Rate (but must be less than per trip rate in #3 above =
Rate per Passenger Mile for Balance =
Leave Blank
and Go to
Section III for
Ambulatory
Service
Leave Blank
and Go to
Section III for
Wheelchair
Service
Do NOT
Complete
Section II for
Stretcher
Service
Leave Blank
and Go to
Section III for
Group Service
Will the CTC be providing any of these Services to transportation disadvantaged passengers in the
upcoming budget year?........................................................................................
If you answered YES to #1 above, do you want to arrive at the billing rate by simply dividing the proposed
contract amount by the projected Passenger Miles / passenger trips?.....
148
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 404 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged
Worksheet for Multiple Service Rates CTC:Collier County B Version 1.4
1.Answer the questions by completing the GREEN cells starting in Section I for all services County:Collier County
2.Follow the DARK RED prompts directing you to skip or go to certain questions and sections based on previous answers
SECTION III: Escort Service 1
1.Do you want to charge all escorts a fee?.................................................................Yes
No
Answer # 2, 3 &
4
2.If you answered Yes to #1, do you want to charge the fee per passenger trip OR ………....Pass. Trip 1
per passenger mile?......................... Pass. Mile
3.If you answered Yes to # 1 and completed # 2, for how many of the projected
Passenger Trips / Passenger Miles will a passenger be accompanied by an escort?944 Passenger Trips
4,720.00$
4.How much will you charge each escort?....................................................................5.00$ per Passenger Trip
SECTION IV: Group Service Loading
1.
number of Group Service Passenger Miles? (otherwise leave blank)............................82,699
Loading Rate
………. And what is the projected total number of Group Vehicle Revenue Miles?59,011 1.40 to 1.00
SECTION V: Rate Calculations for Mulitple Services:
1.
* Miles and Trips you input must sum to the total for all Services entered on the "Program-wide Rates" Worksheet, MINUS miles
and trips for contracted services IF the rates were calculated in the Section II above
* Be sure to leave the service BLANK if you answered NO in Section I or YES to question #2 in Section II
RATES FOR FY:2020 -2021
Ambul Wheel Chair Stretcher Group
Leave Blank
Projected Passenger Miles (excluding totally contracted services addressed in Section II) = 1,353,642 =1,055,155 +215,788 ++82,699
Rate per Passenger Mile = $2.96 $5.08 $0.00 $2.12 $2.96
per passenger per group
Ambul Wheel Chair Stretcher Group
Leave Blank
Projected Passenger Trips (excluding totally contracted services addressed in Section II) = 108,000 =85,520 +19,746 ++2,734
Rate per Passenger Trip = $36.24 $62.13 $0.00 $25.87 $36.26
per passenger per group
2 If you answered # 1 above and want a COMBINED Rate per Trip PLUS a per Mile add-on for 1 or more services,…Combination Trip and Mile Rate
Ambul Wheel Chair Stretcher Group
Leave Blank
…INPUT the Desired Rate per Trip (but must be less than per trip rate above) =$0.00
Rate per Passenger Mile for Balance =$2.96 $5.08 $0.00 $2.12 $2.96
per passenger per group
You Must
Complete This
Section!If the message "You Must Complete This Section" appears to the right, what is the projected total
Input Projected Passenger Miles and Passenger Trips for each Service in the GREEN cells and the Rates for each Service will be calculated automatically
149
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 405 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged
Worksheet for Multiple Service Rates CTC:Collier County B Version 1.4
1.Answer the questions by completing the GREEN cells starting in Section I for all services County:Collier County
2.Follow the DARK RED prompts directing you to skip or go to certain questions and sections based on previous answers
Rates If No Revenue Funds Were Identified As Subsidy Funds
Ambul Wheel Chair Stretcher Group
Rate per Passenger Mile = $3.75 $6.44 $0.00 $2.68 $3.76
per passenger per group
Ambul Wheel Chair Stretcher Group
Rate per Passenger Trip = $45.93 $78.74 $0.00 $32.79 $45.95
per passenger per group
Program These Rates Into Your Medicaid Encounter Data
150
4.H.1
Packet Pg. 406 Attachment: TDSP 2020 Minor Update (12571 : Ratification of the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged
06/12/2020
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Approval of the Fiscal Year 2020/21 Transportation Disadvantage (TD) Planning Grant
OBJECTIVE: For the MPO Board to approve the FY 2020/21 TD Planning Grant Application and
supporting resolution.
CONSIDERATIONS: The MPO has the authority to file a TD Planning Grant Application for Collier
County and to undertake a TD service project as authorized by Section 427.0159, Florida Statutes, and
Rule 41-2, Florida Administrative Code. As part of the annual process, the TD Grant Application m ust be
filed by July 1st. The amount requested in the TD Grant application for FY 2020/21 is $27,016. These
funds will be used as described in the FY 2020/21-2021/22 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP),
Task 6 - Transit and Transportation Disadvantaged and the TD Planning Grant Agreement. The planning
tasks include:
• Conducting the annual Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan Update;
• Annual Community Transportation Coordinator (CTC) Evaluation;
• Staff support at LCB meetings;
• Legal advertisement of LCB meetings;
• Conducting the annual Public Hearing;
• Conducting LCB training
• Review of LCB bylaws, grievance procedures, reports; and
• Staff attending TD Training Events and TD Commission meetings.
The FY 2020/21 planning grant allocation is included as Attachment 1. The completed application
(Attachment 2) and resolution (Attachment 3) must be submitted to the TD Commission to receive
funding. The planning grant agreement for FY 2020/21 is included as Attachment 4.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: The Local Coordinating Board (LCB) for the Transportation
Disadvantaged reviewed and endorsed the TD planning grant application and Resolution 2020-08 at its
June 3, 2020 meeting.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the Board approve the grant application and Resolution.
Prepared By: Brandy Otero, Principal Planner
ATTACHMENT(S)
1. 2020/21 Planning Grant Allocations (PDF)
2. TD Planning Grant Application (PDF)
3. Resolution 2020-08 (PDF)
4. FY 2020/21 Planning Grant Agreement (PDF)
4.I
Packet Pg. 407
06/12/2020
COLLIER COUNTY
Metropolitan Planning Organization
Item Number: 4.I
Doc ID: 12578
Item Summary: Approval of the Fiscal Year 2020/21 Transportation Disadvantage (TD) Planning
Grant
Meeting Date: 06/12/2020
Prepared by:
Title: – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Karen Intriago
06/04/2020 10:13 AM
Submitted by:
Title: Executive Director - MPO – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Anne McLaughlin
06/04/2020 10:13 AM
Approved By:
Review:
Metropolitan Planning Organization Brandy Otero MPO Analyst Review Completed 06/04/2020 11:07 AM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin MPO Executive Director Review Completed 06/04/2020 11:10 AM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin Meeting Pending 06/12/2020 9:00 AM
4.I
Packet Pg. 408
4.I.1
Packet Pg. 409 Attachment: 2020/21 Planning Grant Allocations (12578 : Approval of the Fiscal Year 2020/21 Transportation Disadvantage (TD) Planning Grant)
4.I.2
Packet Pg. 410 Attachment: TD Planning Grant Application (12578 : Approval of the Fiscal Year 2020/21 Transportation Disadvantage (TD) Planning Grant)
4.I.3
Packet Pg. 411 Attachment: Resolution 2020-08 (12578 : Approval of the Fiscal Year 2020/21 Transportation Disadvantage (TD) Planning Grant)
4.I.4
Packet Pg. 412 Attachment: FY 2020/21 Planning Grant Agreement (12578 : Approval of the Fiscal Year 2020/21 Transportation Disadvantage (TD) Planning
4.I.4
Packet Pg. 413 Attachment: FY 2020/21 Planning Grant Agreement (12578 : Approval of the Fiscal Year 2020/21 Transportation Disadvantage (TD) Planning
4.I.4
Packet Pg. 414 Attachment: FY 2020/21 Planning Grant Agreement (12578 : Approval of the Fiscal Year 2020/21 Transportation Disadvantage (TD) Planning
4.I.4
Packet Pg. 415 Attachment: FY 2020/21 Planning Grant Agreement (12578 : Approval of the Fiscal Year 2020/21 Transportation Disadvantage (TD) Planning
4.I.4
Packet Pg. 416 Attachment: FY 2020/21 Planning Grant Agreement (12578 : Approval of the Fiscal Year 2020/21 Transportation Disadvantage (TD) Planning
4.I.4
Packet Pg. 417 Attachment: FY 2020/21 Planning Grant Agreement (12578 : Approval of the Fiscal Year 2020/21 Transportation Disadvantage (TD) Planning
4.I.4
Packet Pg. 418 Attachment: FY 2020/21 Planning Grant Agreement (12578 : Approval of the Fiscal Year 2020/21 Transportation Disadvantage (TD) Planning
4.I.4
Packet Pg. 419 Attachment: FY 2020/21 Planning Grant Agreement (12578 : Approval of the Fiscal Year 2020/21 Transportation Disadvantage (TD) Planning
4.I.4
Packet Pg. 420 Attachment: FY 2020/21 Planning Grant Agreement (12578 : Approval of the Fiscal Year 2020/21 Transportation Disadvantage (TD) Planning
4.I.4
Packet Pg. 421 Attachment: FY 2020/21 Planning Grant Agreement (12578 : Approval of the Fiscal Year 2020/21 Transportation Disadvantage (TD) Planning
4.I.4
Packet Pg. 422 Attachment: FY 2020/21 Planning Grant Agreement (12578 : Approval of the Fiscal Year 2020/21 Transportation Disadvantage (TD) Planning
4.I.4
Packet Pg. 423 Attachment: FY 2020/21 Planning Grant Agreement (12578 : Approval of the Fiscal Year 2020/21 Transportation Disadvantage (TD) Planning
4.I.4
Packet Pg. 424 Attachment: FY 2020/21 Planning Grant Agreement (12578 : Approval of the Fiscal Year 2020/21 Transportation Disadvantage (TD) Planning
4.I.4
Packet Pg. 425 Attachment: FY 2020/21 Planning Grant Agreement (12578 : Approval of the Fiscal Year 2020/21 Transportation Disadvantage (TD) Planning
MPO Chair
4.I.4
Packet Pg. 426 Attachment: FY 2020/21 Planning Grant Agreement (12578 : Approval of the Fiscal Year 2020/21 Transportation Disadvantage (TD) Planning
4.I.4
Packet Pg. 427 Attachment: FY 2020/21 Planning Grant Agreement (12578 : Approval of the Fiscal Year 2020/21 Transportation Disadvantage (TD) Planning
4.I.4
Packet Pg. 428 Attachment: FY 2020/21 Planning Grant Agreement (12578 : Approval of the Fiscal Year 2020/21 Transportation Disadvantage (TD) Planning
4.I.4
Packet Pg. 429 Attachment: FY 2020/21 Planning Grant Agreement (12578 : Approval of the Fiscal Year 2020/21 Transportation Disadvantage (TD) Planning
4.I.4
Packet Pg. 430 Attachment: FY 2020/21 Planning Grant Agreement (12578 : Approval of the Fiscal Year 2020/21 Transportation Disadvantage (TD) Planning
4.I.4
Packet Pg. 431 Attachment: FY 2020/21 Planning Grant Agreement (12578 : Approval of the Fiscal Year 2020/21 Transportation Disadvantage (TD) Planning
4.I.4
Packet Pg. 432 Attachment: FY 2020/21 Planning Grant Agreement (12578 : Approval of the Fiscal Year 2020/21 Transportation Disadvantage (TD) Planning
06/12/2020
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Ratification of the Community Transportation Coordinator (CTC) Local Coordinating Board
(LCB) Evaluation
OBJECTIVE: For the MPO Board to ratify the annual Community Transportation Coordinator (CTC)
Local Coordinating Board (LCB) Evaluation.
CONSIDERATIONS: As a requirement of the Florida Commission for Transportation Disadvantaged
(CTD) Planning Grant, the LCB must conduct an annual an evaluation of the CTC. This evaluation must
be completed and submitted to the CTD prior to the end of the fiscal year (June 30, 2020). The CTC
evaluation is included as an appendix in the Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) annual
report. The MPO staff, along with LCB members, completed the annual evaluation of the CTC, shown as
Attachment 1.
The Public Transit and Neighborhood Enhancement (PTNE) Division is designated to act as the CTC for
Collier County. The PTNE Division has provided a response to the CTC evaluation, shown as
Attachment 2.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: The Local Coordinating Board (LCB) for the Transportation
Disadvantaged reviewed and approved the CTC-LCB Evaluation at its meeting on June 3rd.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: To ratify the FY 2018-19 CTC evaluation.
Prepared By: Josephine Medina, Senior Planner
ATTACHMENT(S)
1. FY 2018-19 CTC Evaluation (PDF)
2. PTNE Division’s response to the CTC Evaluation (PDF)
4.J
Packet Pg. 433
06/12/2020
COLLIER COUNTY
Metropolitan Planning Organization
Item Number: 4.J
Doc ID: 12575
Item Summary: Ratification of the Community Transportation Coordinator (CTC) Local
Coordinating Board (LCB) Evaluation
Meeting Date: 06/12/2020
Prepared by:
Title: – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Karen Intriago
06/04/2020 9:15 AM
Submitted by:
Title: Executive Director - MPO – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Anne McLaughlin
06/04/2020 9:15 AM
Approved By:
Review:
Metropolitan Planning Organization Brandy Otero MPO Analyst Review Completed 06/04/2020 9:25 AM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin MPO Executive Director Review Completed 06/04/2020 9:28 AM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin Meeting Pending 06/12/2020 9:00 AM
4.J
Packet Pg. 434
CTC BEING REVIEWED:
COUNTY (IES):
ADDRESS:
CONTACT:PHONE:
REVIEW PERIOD: _______REVIEW DATES:
PERSON CONDUCTING THE REVIEW:
CONTACT INFORMATION:
FORMATTED 2011 – 2012
CTC
EVALUATION WORKBOOK
4.J.1
Packet Pg. 435 Attachment: FY 2018-19 CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation Coordinator)
Page 5
EVALUATION INFORMATION
An LCB review will consist of, but is not limited to the following
pages:
1 Cover Page
5 - 6 Entrance Interview Questions
12 Chapter 427.0155 (3) Review the CTC monitoring of
contracted operators
13 Chapter 427.0155 (4) Review TDSP to determine utilization
of school buses and public transportation services
19 Insurance
23 Rule 41-2.011 (2) Evaluation of cost-effectiveness of
Coordination Contractors and Transportation Alternatives
25 - 29 Commission Standards and Local Standards
39 On-Site Observation
40 – 43 Surveys
44 Level of Cost - Worksheet 1
45-46 Level of Competition – Worksheet 2
47 - 48 Level of Coordination – Worksheet 3
Notes to remember:
The CTC should not conduct the evaluation or surveys. If the CTC is also the PA,
the PA should contract with an outside source to assist the LCB during the review
process.
Attach a copy of the Annual QA Self Certification.
4.J.1
Packet Pg. 436 Attachment: FY 2018-19 CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation Coordinator)
Page 6
ENTRANCE INTERVIEW QUESTIONS
INTRODUCTION AND BRIEFING:
Describe the evaluation process (LCB evaluates the CTC and forwards a copy of the
evaluation to the CTD).
The LCB reviews the CTC once every year to evaluate the operations and the
performance of the local coordinator.
The LCB will be reviewing the following areas:
Chapter 427, Rules 41-2 and 14-90, CTD Standards, and Local Standards
Following up on the Status Report from last year and calls received from the
Ombudsman program.
Monitoring of contractors.
Surveying riders/beneficiaries, purchasers of service, and contractors
The LCB will issue a Review Report with the findings and recommendations to the CTC
no later than 30 working days after the review has concluded.
Once the CTC has received the Review Report, the CTC will submit a Status Report to
the LCB within 30 working days.
Give an update of Commission level activities (last meeting update and next meeting
date), if needed.
USING THE APR, COMPILE THIS INFORMATION:
1. OPERATING ENVIRONMENT:
RURAL URBAN
2. ORGANIZATION TYPE:
PRIVATE-FOR-PROFIT
PRIVATE NON-PROFIT
GOVERNMENT
TRANSPORTATION AGENCY
4.J.1
Packet Pg. 437 Attachment: FY 2018-19 CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation Coordinator)
Page 7
3. NETWORK TYPE:
SOLE PROVIDER
PARTIAL BROKERAGE
COMPLETE BROKERAGE
4. NAME THE OPERATORS THAT YOUR COMPANY HAS CONTRACTS WITH:
5. NAME THE GROUPS THAT YOUR COMPANY HAS COORDINATION
CONTRACTS WITH:
Coordination Contract Agencies
Name of
Agency
Address City, State, Zip Telephone
Number
Contact
Good Wheels, Inc. 10075 Bavaria Rd Fort Myers, FL, 33913 (239) 768‐2900 Alan M. Mandel
Easter Seals
Florida, Inc.8793 Tamiami
Trl E Suite 111 Naples, FL, 34113 (239) 403‐0366 Susan Ventura
Sunrise Community
of S.W. Florida 4227 Exchange Avenue Naples, FL, 34104 (239) 643‐5338 Cassandra
Beaver
4.J.1
Packet Pg. 438 Attachment: FY 2018-19 CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation Coordinator)
Page 8
6. NAME THE ORGANIZATIONS AND AGENCIES THAT PURCHASE SERVICE
FROM THE CTC AND THE PERCENTAGE OF TRIPS EACH REPRESENTS?
(Recent APR information may be used)
Name of Agency % of Trips Name of Contact Telephone Number
7. REVIEW AND DISCUSS TD HELPLINE CALLS:
Number of calls Closed Cases Unsolved Cases
Cost
Medicaid
Quality of Service
Service Availability
Toll Permit
Other
4.J.1
Packet Pg. 439 Attachment: FY 2018-19 CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation Coordinator)
Page 13
COMPLIANCE WITH CHAPTER 427, F.S.
Review the CTC contracts for compliance with 427.0155(1), F.S.
“Execute uniform contracts for service using a standard contract, which
includes performance standards for operators.”
ARE YOUR CONTRACTS UNIFORM? Yes No
IS THE CTD’S STANDARD CONTRACT UTILIZED? Yes No
DO THE CONTRACTS INCLUDE PERFORMANCE STANDARDS FOR THE TRANSPORTATION
OPERATORS AND COORDINATION CONTRACTORS?
Yes No
DO THE CONTRACTS INCLUDE THE PROPER LANGUAGE CONCERNING PAYMENT TO
SUBCONTRACTORS? (Section 21.20: Payment to Subcontractors, T&E Grant, and FY)
Yes No
IS THE CTC IN COMPLIANCE WITH THIS SECTION? Yes No
Operator Name Exp. Date SSPP AOR Reporting Insurance
4.J.1
Packet Pg. 440 Attachment: FY 2018-19 CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation Coordinator)
Page 14
COMPLIANCE WITH CHAPTER 427, F.S.
Review the CTC last AOR submittal for compliance with 427. 0155(2)
“Collect Annual Operating Data for submittal to the Commission.”
REPORTING TIMELINESS
Were the following items submitted on time?
a.Annual Operating Report Yes No
Any issues that need clarification? Yes No
Any problem areas on AOR that have been re-occurring?
List:
b. Memorandum of Agreement Yes No
c.Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan Yes No
d. Grant Applications to TD Trust Fund Yes No
e.All other grant application (____%)Yes No
IS THE CTC IN COMPLIANCE WITH THIS SECTION? Yes No
Comments:
4.J.1
Packet Pg. 441 Attachment: FY 2018-19 CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation Coordinator)
Page 15
COMPLIANCE WITH CHAPTER 427, F.S.
Review the CTC monitoring of its transportation operator contracts to ensure
compliance with 427.0155(3), F.S.
“Review all transportation operator contracts annually.”
WHAT TYPE OF MONITORING DOES THE CTC PERFORM ON ITS OPERATOR(S) AND
HOW OFTEN IS IT CONDUCTED?
Is a written report issued to the operator? Yes No
If NO, how are the contractors notified of the results of the monitoring?
WHAT TYPE OF MONITORING DOES THE CTC PERFORM ON ITS COORDINATION
CONTRACTORS AND HOW OFTEN IS IT CONDUCTED?
Is a written report issued? Yes No
If NO, how are the contractors notified of the results of the monitoring?
WHAT ACTION IS TAKEN IF A CONTRACTOR RECEIVES AN UNFAVORABLE
REPORT?
IS THE CTC IN COMPLIANCE WITH THIS SECTION? Yes No
ASK TO SEE DOCUMENTATION OF MONITORING REPORTS.
PTNE monitors the operations contractor for compliance with FTA requirements and contract compliance in the following
ways: conduct bi-weekly operational meetings that include staff from Fleet Maintenance, CAT fixed route and paratransit
operations, and County staff. Agendas for those meetings include topics such as safety, maintenance, ADA, customer service,
operations, etc. to ensure operational efficiency. Reports are provided by the vendor as specified by the contract and reviewed
by the Public Transit Manager. These reports include accident/incidents, customer service, farebox validation, drug and
alcohol testing, ridership, performance measures and on-time performance. Internal Controls have been established to review
driver training and pre-trip inspections. Operator inspections are conducted periodically.
The coordination contractors are required to provide quarterly reports of the service being performed for
CTC monitoring.
If a vehicle purchased with 5310 grant funds is used to provide the service by the Coordination
contractor then vehicle records are provided to the CTC to ensure appropriate maintenance. Monthly
reports are provided to the CTC.
4.J.1
Packet Pg. 442 Attachment: FY 2018-19 CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation Coordinator)
Page 16
COMPLIANCE WITH CHAPTER 427, F.S.
Review the TDSP to determine the utilization of school buses and public
transportation services [Chapter 427.0155(4)]
“Approve and coordinate the utilization of school bus and public transportation
services in accordance with the TDSP.”
HOW IS THE CTC USING SCHOOL BUSES IN THE COORDINATED SYSTEM?
Rule 41-2.012(5)(b): "As part of the Coordinator’s performance, the local
Coordinating Board shall also set an annual percentage goal increase for the
number of trips provided within the system for ridership on public transit, where
applicable. In areas where the public transit is not being utilized, the local
Coordinating Board shall set an annual percentage of the number of trips to be
provided on public transit."
HOW IS THE CTC USING PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION SERVICES IN THE COORDINATED
SYSTEM?
N/A
IS THERE A GOAL FOR TRANSFERRING PASSENGERS FROM PARATRANSIT TO TRANSIT?
Yes No
If YES, what is the goal?
Is the CTC accomplishing the goal? Yes No
IS THE CTC IN COMPLIANCE WITH THIS REQUIREMENT? Yes No
Comments:
4.J.1
Packet Pg. 443 Attachment: FY 2018-19 CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation Coordinator)
Page 21
CHAPTER 427
Findings:
Recommendations:
4.J.1
Packet Pg. 444 Attachment: FY 2018-19 CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation Coordinator)
Page 22
COMPLIANCE WITH 41-2, F.A.C.
Compliance with 41-2.006(1), Minimum Insurance Compliance
“...ensure compliance with the minimum liability insurance requirement of
$100,000 per person and $200,000 per incident…”
WHAT ARE THE MINIMUM LIABILITY INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS?
WHAT ARE THE MINIMUM LIABILITY INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS IN THE
OPERATOR AND COORDINATION CONTRACTS?
HOW MUCH DOES THE INSURANCE COST (per operator)?
Operator Insurance Cost
DOES THE MINIMUM LIABILITY INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS EXCEED $1 MILLION
PER INCIDENT?
Yes No
If yes, was this approved by the Commission? Yes No
IS THE CTC IN COMPLIANCE WITH THIS SECTION? Yes No
Comments:
4.J.1
Packet Pg. 445 Attachment: FY 2018-19 CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation Coordinator)
Page 26
COMPLIANCE WITH 41-2, F.A.C.
Compliance with 41-2.011(2), Evaluating Cost-Effectiveness of Coordination
Contractors and Transportation Alternatives.
“...contracts shall be reviewed annually by the Community Transportation
Coordinator and the Coordinating Board as to the effectiveness and efficiency of
the Transportation Operator or the renewal of any Coordination Contracts.”
1. IF THE CTC HAS COORDINATION CONTRACTORS, DETERMINE THE COST-
EFFECTIVENESS OF THESE CONTRACTORS.
Cost [CTC and Coordination Contractor (CC)]
CTC CC #1 CC #2 CC #3 CC #4
Flat contract rate (s) ($ amount /
unit)
Detail other rates as needed: (e.g.
ambulatory, wheelchair, stretcher,
out-of-county, group)
Special or unique considerations that influence costs?
Explanation:
CC#1=Sunrise; CC#2=Easter Seals; CC#3=Goodwheels, David Lawrence and Hope Hospice did not
provide service last year.
4.J.1
Packet Pg. 446 Attachment: FY 2018-19 CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation Coordinator)
Page 27
2. DO YOU HAVE TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES? Yes No
(Those specific transportation services approved by rule or the Commission as a service not
normally arranged by the Community Transportation Coordinator, but provided by the
purchasing agency. Example: a neighbor providing the trip)
Cost [CTC and Transportation Alternative (Alt.)]
CTC Alt. #1 Alt. #2 Alt. #3 Alt. #4
Flat contract rate (s) ($ amount /
unit)
Detail other rates as needed: (e.g.
ambulatory, wheelchair, stretcher,
out-of-county, group)
Special or unique considerations that influence costs?
Explanation:
IS THE CTC IN COMPLIANCE WITH THIS SECTION? Yes No
N/A
4.J.1
Packet Pg. 447 Attachment: FY 2018-19 CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation Coordinator)
Page 28
RULE 41-2
Findings:
Recommendations:
4.J.1
Packet Pg. 448 Attachment: FY 2018-19 CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation Coordinator)
Page 29
COMPLIANCE WITH 41-2, F.A.C.
Compliance with Commission Standards
“...shall adhere to Commission approved standards …”
Review the TDSP for the Commission standards.
Commission Standards Comments
Local toll free phone number
must be posted in all vehicles.
Vehicle Cleanliness
Passenger/Trip Database
4.J.1
Packet Pg. 449 Attachment: FY 2018-19 CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation Coordinator)
Page 30
Adequate seating
Driver Identification
Passenger Assistance
Smoking, Eating and Drinking
4.J.1
Packet Pg. 450 Attachment: FY 2018-19 CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation Coordinator)
Page 31
Two-way Communications
Air Conditioning/Heating
Billing Requirements
4.J.1
Packet Pg. 451 Attachment: FY 2018-19 CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation Coordinator)
Page 32
COMMISSION STANDARDS
Findings:
Recommendations:
4.J.1
Packet Pg. 452 Attachment: FY 2018-19 CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation Coordinator)
Page 33
COMPLIANCE WITH 41-2, F.A.C.
Compliance with Local Standards
“...shall adhere to Commission approved standards...”
Review the TDSP for the Local standards.
Local Standards Comments
Transport of Escorts and
dependent children policy
Use, Responsibility, and cost of
child restraint devices
Out-of-Service Area trips
CPR/1st Aid
Driver Criminal Background
Screening
Rider Personal Property
Advance reservation
requirements
Pick-up Window
The TDSP addresses this standard. Personal care attendants must
be approved on initial customer application with medical
documentation for reason attendant is needed. If an escort/
personal care attendant is requested, they will be transported at
no additional charge.
The TDSP addresses this standard. All drivers in the coordinated system
must have a “favorable” background check from the Florida Department
of Law Enforcement (“favorable” as defined by the Department of
Children and Families policies and procedures).
The TDSP addresses this standard. Reservations are taken a day in advance
up to 5 p.m. the business day prior to the trip request. Passengers with an
urgent need to travel should call the CTC. Unless other regulations are
applicable, same day trip requests cannot be guaranteed. However, the CTC
will attempt to accommodate the request.
TDSP addresses this standard. For the focus of this evaluation the 30 minute early to
zero minute late medical and employment policy was reviewed for trips. Effective
12-04-2019 the LCB approved a negotiated methodology for trips based on a mileage based
scheduling. The TDSP will be amended to include the updated window policy.
4.J.1
Packet Pg. 453 Attachment: FY 2018-19 CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation Coordinator)
Page 34
Measurable
Standards/Goals
Standard/Goal Latest Figures Is the
CTC/Operator
meeting the
Standard?
Public Transit Ridership CTC CTC
Operator A Operator A
Operator B Operator B
Operator C Operator C
On-time performance CTC CTC
Operator A Operator A
Operator B Operator B
Operator C Operator C
Passenger No-shows CTC CTC
Operator A Operator A
Operator B Operator B
Operator C Operator C
Accidents CTC CTC
Operator A Operator A
Operator B Operator B
Operator C Operator C
Roadcalls
Average age of fleet:
CTC CTC
Operator A Operator A
Operator B Operator B
Operator C Operator C
Complaints
Number filed:
CTC CTC
Operator A Operator A
Operator B Operator B
Operator C Operator C
Call-Hold Time CTC CTC
Operator A Operator A
Operator B Operator B
Operator C Operator C
No more than 1.2
per 100,000 miles
No less than
10,000 miles
4.J.1
Packet Pg. 454 Attachment: FY 2018-19 CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation Coordinator)
Page 35
LOCAL STANDARDS
Findings:
Recommendations:
The on-time performance for medical and employment continues to be an issue. During the annual public workshop
meeting the STARability Foundation indicated various of its participants at various locations are being picked up or
dropped off late sometimes by hours at a time and requested a better method of communicating with families when
buses will be late. Comments from rider surveys also mention late drop off and pick up times for medical and
employment as being issues. Three respondents indicated a heightened level of stress of not knowing whether they
would get to their destinations on time. One of these three respondents is no longer using the service for this reason
and another respondent indicated that they are paying Uber or a friend to get them to their destination and only
using the service for trips that are not time sensitive. Other comments included that they are not being notified of
tardiness, and vehicle issues or being notified hours after an issue has occurred which does not allow them to find an
alternative way home. Comments also indicated they are having issues with the incorrect scheduling of their trips.
The CTC is encouraged to provide in their quarterly report to the LCB the on-time performance for medical and
employment trips individually not just as part of the overall on time performance for all trips. It is also encouraged
that they provide a quarterly report to the LCB on measures that are being done to help address these issues with on
time performance.
The CTC is encouraged to devise a system to inform passengers of when their driver would be arriving and to
confirm scheduling information for their trips. The CTC is encouraged to pursue the phone system to enhance
customer service.
In the next TDSP update service standard changes due to new trip assignment methodology should be reflected in
Pick-Up Window, and return trip scheduling.
4.J.1
Packet Pg. 455 Attachment: FY 2018-19 CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation Coordinator)
: til+uNJ: l0l
RIDE A VEHICLE WITIN TFIE COORDINATED SYSTEM. REQUEST A
COPY OF TFIE MANIFEST PAGE THAT CONTAINS THIS TRIP.
Date of Observation:\lr3lzoar
Please list any special guests that were present:
ON-Srrn Onsrnv.lrroN oF TrrE Sysrnnr
Location:U -ADT L{A EXCHA E
Number of Passengers picked up/dropped off:
Ambulatory
Non-Ambulatory
Was the driver on time? B Yes No - How many minutes late/early?
Did the driver provide any passenger assistance? E Yes E No
Was the driver wearing any identification?tr Yes: flunifo.rn O Name Tag
fl to euag" D No
Did the driver render an appropriate greeting?
Ey". ENo E Driver regularly transpo(s the rider, not necessary
IfCTC has a poticy on seat belts, did the driver ensure the passengers were properly belted?
XYestrNo
Was the vehicle neat and clean, and free from dirt, torn upholstery, damaged or broken seats,
protruding metal or other objects? ( y"r E No
Is there a sign posted on the interior ofthe vehicle with both a local phone number and the TD
Helpline for comments/complaints/commendations? E Yes tr No
Does the vehicle have working heat and air conditioning?AYesONo
Does the vehicle have two-way communications in good working o.d".? X Yes No
Ifused, was the lift in good working order?o
6
3
j
Page 45
E Yes No
n
I
4.J.1
Packet Pg. 456 Attachment: FY 2018-19 CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation Coordinator)
Was there safe and appropriate seating for all passengers?
Did the driver properly use the lift and secure the passenger?
If No, please explain:
EYesnNo
XYesnNo
CTC:Counly:
Date of Ride:
Number of Round Tri ps Number of Riders/Beneficiaries to Survev0 200 3j%o
201 - 1200 t0%
l20l +
Funding Source No.
of Trips
No. of
Riders/Beneficiaries
No. of Calls
to Make
No. of
Calls Made
CTD
Medicaid
Other
Other
oth er)
Other
Totals
Page 46
Note: Attach the manifest
4.J.1
Packet Pg. 457 Attachment: FY 2018-19 CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation Coordinator)
Vehicle: 830-Glaval
1117
Driver Name: Andy Ramtahal [ 4:35AM - 4:06P]q Fot: 1l23l2O2ORun: 101 [ 4:35AM - 4:05PMl
Stop Time Customer Name
8:29AM
Stop Address
7905 Preserve Cir APT -111 GATECODE 1395
Naples, FL 341 19
894861 9:20AM D Stop Time
Odometer
B:29AM
Pick Up
Customer Pay:
$1.00
AtGnA"i;, t -cueiii: o
Fare Type: Assorted
222878
ancellation
No Show
Complete
lvlobility:WHEELCHAIR AssistanceNeed
Cash Paid Ahead Return Pay Tickets
Funding Source: ADA
Daily Pass Sold
B:43AM gate code #2952
6900 Hunlington Lakes Cir. APT202 Gate code f6595
Naples, FL 34119
867942 9:20AM D Stop Time
Odometer
8r43AM
222441
ancellation
No Show
Complete
Pick Up
Customer Pay:
$1.00
Attendants: 0 Guesls: 0 Mobility: AMB Assistance Need
Comments:#6595
Fare Type: Assorted Cash Paid Ahead Return Pay Tickets
Daily Pass Sold
Funding Source: TDC
9:13AM
Drop Off
UCP-ADT
4227 Exchange Ave
Naples, FL 34104
824885 9:20AM D Stop Time
Odometer
9:1 3ANI
222891
Attendants: 0 Guests: 0 lvobility: WHEELCHAIR Assistance Need
Comments:one way
Daily Pass Sold
UCP-ADT
4227 Exchange Ave
Naples, FL 34104
867942 9.'13AtM
222891
Attendants: 0 Guests: 0
Comments:#6595
Mobility: AlvlB Assistance Need:Funding Source: TDC
Daily Pass Sold
Page 4 of B Driver Initial $'*.,,"ry,g.
Conf. # Request Time Validation lnformation
tr
tr
Funding Source: ADA
9:13AM
Drop Off
9:20AM D Stop Time
Odometer
t.
Run By Vehicle
4.J.1
Packet Pg. 458 Attachment: FY 2018-19 CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation
Vehicle: B30-Glaval
1117
Driver Name: Andy Rarntahal [ 4:35AM - 4:06Pi/tJ Foti 1l23l2O2ORun: l0'l [ 4:35AM - 4:06Pill
Stop Time Customer Name Stop Address Conf. # Request Time Validation Informption
9:13AM
Drop Off
UCP-ADT
4227 Exchange Ave
Naples, FL 34'104
a29A22 9:20AM D Stop Time
Odometer
9:13AM
222891
Attendants: 0 Guests: O Mobility: WHEELCHAIR Assistance Need
Daily Pass Sold
Funding Source: ADA
9:13AM
Drop Off
UCP-ADT
4227 Exchange Ave
Naples, FL 34104
894861 g:20AM D Stop Time
Odometer
9:'13AM
222891
Attendants: o Guests: 0 Mobility: WHEELCHAIR Assistance Need
Daily Pass Sold
Funding Source: ADA
9:'l3AM
Drop Off
UCP-ADT
4227 Exchange Ave
Naples, FL 34104
671431 9:20AM D Stop Time
Odometer
9:13AM
222891
Attendants: 0 Guests:o Mobility: A[48
Daily Pass Sold
Assistance Need Funding Source: TDC
9.13AM
Drop Off
L'CP-ADT
4227 Exchange Ave
Naples, FL 34104
878089 9:204M D Stop Time
Odometer 222891
Attendants: 0 Guests: 0 lilobility: AMB
Daily Pass Sold
Funding Source: ADA
Run By Vehicle Page 5 of B Driver Initial:I nout.rvrrt.t
Assistance Need:
9:13ANil
1
4.J.1
Packet Pg. 459 Attachment: FY 2018-19 CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation
BUS: rrr:+ Ruf,\.\o\
zuDE A VEHICLE WITIN THE COORDINATED SYSTEM. REQI.IESTA
COPY OF THE MANIFEST PAGE THAT CONTAINS THIS TRIP.
Date of Observation I acD
Please list any special guests that were present:
ON-Srrr OsspRvarroN oF THE Sysrr,y
Location:qs5 cl ,ll t
Number of Passengers picked up/dropped oft
Ambulatory
Non-Ambulatorv
Was the driver on time? E Yes I No - How many minutes late/early?
Did the driver provide any passenger assisrance? E Yes No
Was the driver wearing any identification?I Yes: E Unifo.rn O Name Tag
El Io sadge O No
Did the driver render an appropriate greeting?
By., E No E Driver regularly transports the rider, not necessary
If CTC has a policy on seat belts, did the driver ensure the passengers were properly belted?
&YestrNo
Was the vehicle neat and clean, and free from dirt, torn upholstery, damaged or broken seats,
protruding metal or other objects? tr yes tr No
Is there a sign posted on the interior ofthe vehicle with both a local phone number and the TD
Helpline for comments/complaints/commendations? E Yes E No
Does the vehicle have working heat and air conditioning?E Yes t\o
Does the vehicle have two-way communications in good working order? E yes No
If used, was the lift in good working order?L] Yes
t
I
N/A
I
No
I
Page 45
4.J.1
Packet Pg. 460 Attachment: FY 2018-19 CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation Coordinator)
Was there safe and appropriate seating for all passengers?
Did the driver properly use the lift and secure ttre passenger? \ /fi,
If No, please explain:
& Yes No
Yes I No
CTC:County:
Date of Ride:
Number of Round Trips Number of Riders/Beneficiaries to Sunev
0-200 30%
201 1200 t0%
l20l +5%
Funding Source No.
of Trips
No. of
Riders/Beneficia ries
No. of Calls
to Make
No. of
Calls Made
CTD
Medicaid
Other
Other
Other)
Other
Totals
Page 46
Note: Attach the manifest
4.J.1
Packet Pg. 461 Attachment: FY 2018-19 CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation Coordinator)
Vehicle: B3o-Glaval
1117
Run: 101 [ 4:35AM - 4:06PMJ Driver Name: Andy Ramtahal [ 4:35AM - 4:06Pf{l For: 1l23t2OZ0
Stop Time Customer Name Stop Address Conf. # Request Time Validation lnformation
9:32AM
Pick Up
Customer Pay:
$1.00
ettenOints: o-- Or.ii", o
Fare Type: Assorted
4559 Boabadilla St
Naples, FL 34103
898895 '10:00AM D Stop Time
Odometer
9:32AN.4
222897
Cancellation
No Show
Complete
Mobility: AMB
cash Paid Ahead
Assistance Need
Return Pay Tickets
Funding Source: ADA
Daily Pass Sold
9:47AM
Drop Off
Attendants: 0 Guests: 0 Nilobility: AMB
Daily Pass Sold
Pavillion PIaza
833 Vanderbilt Beach Rd THEATERy MOVIES
Naples, FL 34108
Assistance Need:
8S8895 10:00AM D Stop Time
Odometer
9:47AlM
222901
Funding Source: ADA
'10r17ANi
Pick Up
Customer Pay:
$1.00
At;;G;G, O Or""t"'-o rr,roOirity: enlA
Fare Type: Assorted Cash Paid Ahead
Daily Pass Sold
2334 Oueens Way
Naples. FL 34112
Assistance Need
Return Pay Tickets
859606 ,0:30AM D Stop Time
Odometer
10:17ANI
222913
Funding Source: TDC
10:35AN4
Drop Off
Daily Pass Sold
ARBY'S RESTAURANT
2436 Pine Ridge Rd 43,12264
Naples, FL 34109
Assistance Need:
859606 'l0r35AM
222921
Fundang Source:TDC
RouteMatch
Softuale'
Run By Vehicle Page 6 of 8 Driver Initial;s
Cancellation n
No Show !
Complete I
Attendants: 0 Guests; 0 Mobility: AN4B
10:30AM D Stop Time
Odometer
4.J.1
Packet Pg. 462 Attachment: FY 2018-19 CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation
s: cca-arqn RuN,roa
zuDE A VEHICLE WITIN THE COORDINATED SYSTEM. REQI]'EST A
COPY OF THE MANIFEST PAGE THAT CONTAINS THIS TRIP.
Date of Observation:tla3/ao)c)
On-Srrr OssrRvnrloN oF THE Sysruu
Location:aq +B lcrr Street
Ambulatory
Non-Ambulatory
Was the driver on time? tr Yes tr No - How many minutes latelearly?
Did the driver provide any passenger assistance? tr Yes No
Does the vehicle have working heat and air conditioning?
Does the vehicle have two-way communications in good working order?Yes No
Ifused, was the lift in good vvorking order? |.1/[
D NoYes
D
E
E
ts
I
t
t
Page 45
Yes No
Please list any special guests that were present:
Number of Passengers picked up/dropped off:
Was the driver wearing any identification? E Yes: E Unifo.. I Name Tag
I to eadge O No
Did the driver render an appropriate greeting?
EIy". [No 0 Driver regularly transports the rider, not necessary
If CTC has a policy on seat belts, did the driver ensure the passengers were properly belted?
EyesONo
Was the vehicle neat and clean, and free from dirt. torn upholstery, damaged or broken seats.
protruding metal or other objects? A yes I No
ls there a sign posted on the interior ofthe vehicle with both a local phone number and the TD
Helpline for comments/complaints/commendations? E Yes tr No
4.J.1
Packet Pg. 463 Attachment: FY 2018-19 CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation Coordinator)
Was there safe and appropriate seating for all passengers?
Did the driver properly use the lift and secure the passenger? [.{N,
If No. please explain:
EI Yes D No
Yes No
CTC:County:
Date of Ride:
Number of Round Trips Number of Riders/Beneficiaries to Suney
0-200 30o/o
201 1200 1oyo
l20l +5%
Funding Source No.
of Trips
No. of
Riders/Beneficiaries
No. of Calls
to Make
No. of
Calls Made
CTD
Medicaid
Other
Other
Other)
Other
Totals
Page 46
Note: Attach the manifest
4.J.1
Packet Pg. 464 Attachment: FY 2018-19 CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation Coordinator)
Eugenio . Rodriguez [ 3:00AM -
5:10PMl
Vehicle: CC2-2'197 Run: 102 [ 3:00AM - 5:10PM]Driver Name:Fot:112312020
Stop Time Customer Name Conf. # Request TimeStop Address Validation lnformation
2:45PM
Pick Up
Customer Pay:
$4.00
2978 Poplar St
Naples, FL 34112
900363 2:45PM
23424
Cancellation
No Show
Complete
Attendants: 0 Guests.o
Comments:one way
Fare Type: Assoded
Mobility: AMB Assistance Need:
Cash Paid Ahead Return Pay Tickets
Funding Source: TDC
Daily Pass Sold
3:41PM
Drop Off
PUBLIX
3304 Bonita Beach Rd
Bonita Springs, FL 34134
900363 3:l8PM D Stop Time
Odometer
3:41P1,4
23441
Attendants: 0 Guesls: 0 Mobility: ANiB Assistance Need Funding Source: TDC
COmments:one Way
Daily Pass Sold
Total Customer Pay: $31.00
.t
Run By Vehicle Paqe 9 of 9 Driver Initial:RouteMatch
Softuare'
3:l8PM D Stop Time
Odometer
4.J.1
Packet Pg. 465 Attachment: FY 2018-19 CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation
B)5: cca-a\cl? RuN.toa
zuDE A VEHICLE WITIN THE COORDTNATED SYSTEM. REQI,EST A
COPY OF THE MANIFEST PAGE THAT CONTAINS THIS TRIP.
Or
Please list any special guests that were present:
ON-Srrn OnsrnvatroN oF THE Sysrrlr
Location Colti I trarsrt oc:l.ro Qp
Number of Passengers picked up/dropped off:
Was the driver on time? El Yes
Did the driver provide any passenger assistance? ts Yes E No
Was the driver wearing any identification?E Yes: K urifo., ! Name Tag
) Io Budg" I No
Did the driver render an appropriate greeting?
EY"r INo E Driver regularly transports the rider, not necessary
Il CTC has a policy on seat belts. did the driver ensure the passengers were properly belted?
EyesO No
Was the vehicle neat and clean, and free from dirt, tom upholstery, damaged or broken seats,
protruding metal or other objects? [ V"r tr No
ls there a sign posted on the interior ofthe vehicle with both a local phone number and the TD
Helpline for comments/complaints/commendations? E Yes I No
Does the vehicle have working heat and air conditioning?Yes No
Does the vehicle have two-way communications in good working order? Yes I No
If used. was the lift in good working order? [/[
E
&
D
I
Page 45
Yes No
Date of Observation:
Ambulatory
Non-Ambulatory
I No - How many minutes late/early?
I
4.J.1
Packet Pg. 466 Attachment: FY 2018-19 CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation Coordinator)
Was there safe and appropriate seating for all passengers?B Yes l No
Did the driver properly use the lift and secure the passenger? frl/{Yes E No
lf No, please explain:
CTC:Counfv:
Number of Round Trips Number of Riders/Beneficiaries to Survev
0-200 30%
201 - tz00 l0Yo
l20l +5Yo
Funding Source No.
of Trips
No. of
Riders/Beneficiaries
No. of Calls
to Make
No. of
Calls Made
CTD
Medicaid
Other
Other
Other)
Other
Totals
Page 46
Note: Attach the manifest
D
Date of Ride:
4.J.1
Packet Pg. 467 Attachment: FY 2018-19 CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation Coordinator)
Driver Name:Eugenio . Rodriguez [ 3;00AM -
5:10Pifl
Foti 112312020
Stop Time Customer Name Stop Address Conf. # Request Time
1:17PM
Pick Up
Customer Pay:
$1.00
Attendants: 0 Guests:o lilobility: AMB
Fare Type ; Assorted Cash Paid Ahead
Daily Pass Sold
LORENZO WALKER INSTITUTE
3702 ESTEY AVE- MAIN ENTRANCE
NAPLES, FL 34104
860556 1:'loPM P Stop Time
Odometer
1:17PM
23394
Cancellation
No Show
Complete
Assistance Need:
Return Pay Tickets
Funding Source: ADA
1:37PM
Drop Off
Attendants: 0 Guests: 0 Mobility: AMB
Daily Pass Sold
BOCA PALMS
10292 Boca Cir.
Naples, FL 34109
860556 1:l0PM P Stop Time
Odomeler 23403
Funding Source: ADA
2:15PM
Pick Up
Customer Pay:
$0.00
An;danis o -bru"ii, o
Fare Type : Assorted Cash
Daily Pass Sold
COLLIER AREA PARA TRANSIT
8300 Radio Rd UNLOAD AT FRONT DOOR
Naples, FL 34104
Assistance Need:
Return Pay Tickets Prepaid - 10 Punch h Paid Ahead
Funding Source;ADA
Return Pay Tickets
898549 'l:40PM P Stop Time
Odometer 23415
2:15PI\,Cancellation
No Show
Complete
Mobility: AMB
Paid Ahead
2:30PM
Drop Off
4123 Thomasson Ln #B
Naples, FL 341'12
1:40PM P Stop Time
Odometer
2:30PM
23421
Attendants: 0 Guests; 0 lvlobility: AMB
Daily Pass Sold
Assistance Need Funding Source: ADA
Page I of 9 Driver Initial:
Vehicle: CC2-2197 Run: 102 [ 3:00AM - 5:10PIr[l
Validation lnformation
1 .37PM
Assistance Need:
898549
(,\Run By Vehicle ,$ nu,rr.rur".191
4.J.1
Packet Pg. 468 Attachment: FY 2018-19 CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation
805: ccz- toqq RrrN aoo
RIDE A VEHICLE WITIN TTIE COORDINATED SYSTEM. REQUEST A
COPY OF THE MAMFEST PAGE THAT CONTAINS THIS TRIP.
Date of Observation olla4laoao
Please list any special guests that were present:
Location:
Number ofPassengers picked up/dropped off:
Ambulatory
Non-Ambulatorv
Was the driver on time? E Yes E No - How many minutes latelearly?
Did the driver provide any passenger assistance?B Yes E No
Was the driver wearing any identification?El Yes: E unifo.m I Name Tag
Bl to tudg" D No
Did the driver render an appropriate greeting?
Ely"r ENo E Driver regularly transports the rider, not necessary
If CTC has a policy on seat belts, did the driver ensure the passengers were properly belted?
EYesI No
Was the vehicle neat and clean, and free from dirt, torn upholstery, damaged or broken seats,
protruding metal or other objects? E Yes tr No
Is there a sign posted on the interior ofthe vehicle with both a local phone number and the TD
Helpline for comments/complaints/commendations? El Yes E No
Does the vehicle have working heat and air conditioning?Yes E No
Does the vehicle have two-way communications in good working order? Yes No
If used, was the lift in good working order? \/fi
E
E
II
Ox-Srrr Onsnnva,rroN oF THE Sysrpu
I
I
Page 45
Yes No
I
I
4.J.1
Packet Pg. 469 Attachment: FY 2018-19 CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation Coordinator)
Was there safe and appropriate seating for all passengers?
Yes NoDid the driver properly use the lift and secure the passenger?
N/A Dqeseneer uq\Ked onto bos,
If No, please explain:
CTC:County:
Date of Ride:
Number of Round Trips Number of Riders/Beneficiaries to Sunev
0-200 3lYo
201 - 1200 l0o/o
l20l +5o/o
Funding Source No.
of Trips
No. of
Riders/Beneficiaries
No. of Calls
to Make
No. of
Calls Made
CTD
Medicaid
Other
Other
Other)
Other
Totals
Page 46
Note: Attach the manifest
EYesnNo
4.J.1
Packet Pg. 470 Attachment: FY 2018-19 CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation Coordinator)
0{e
Stop Tlme Customer Name
4:30PM
Stop Addres8
3295 Twllight Ln APT 5301 GATECODE- #8993
Naples, FL 34109
Drlyor Nlmel Douglar Andereon [ 7:tllAl,l .
0:tl6Pi0
Conf. # Request Tlme
494477
vohlcle: 825€laval Run: 200 [ 7!41Ail - 6!tt6Pi4
1
offropD
3:10PM P Stop'Ttme
Odometer
Fori 1DA[2O2O
Valldatlon lnrormatlon
4:30Pi/l
255399
\ttendants: 0 Guests: 0 Mobility: AMB
Daily Pass Sold
Assistance Need:Funding Source: TDC
4:40PM
Drop Of,
VILLAGE AT EIVERALD LAKES 4
7743 Jewel Ln APT '101
Naples, FL 34109
766591 3:15PM P Stop Ime
Odometer
4:40PM
2s 01
\ttendants: 0 Guests: 0 Mobilityi WHEELCHAIR
Daily Pass Sold
Assistance Need:Funding Source: ADA
5:12PM
Pick Up
Customer Pay:
$1.00
Golden Gate Senior Center
4898 Coronado Pkwy
Naples, FL 34116
900730 4:30PM P Stop 1me
odometer
5:12PNI
255411
Cancellation
No Show
Complete
\ttendants: 0 Guests: 0 Mobility: CANE Assistance Need
:ars Type : Assorted Gash Paid Ahead Return Pay lickets
Daily Pass Sold
Funding Source: ADA
5:41PM
Drop Off
HENDERSON CREEK
1032 DOCKSTDE DR #102
Naples, FL 34114
900730 4:30PM P Stop Ime
Odometer
5:41P[I
255421
\ttendants: 0 Guests: 0 Mobility; CANE
Daily Pass Sold
Assistance Need Funding Source: ADA
& Paratransit Run By Vehicle Page 6 of 7 Driver Initial:Sn ',.rrngg-
4.J.1
Packet Pg. 471 Attachment: FY 2018-19 CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation
B S: M\-RUN $l
RIDE A VEHICLE WITIN THE COORDINATED SYSTEM. REQTIEST A
COPY OF THE MANIFEST PAGE TIIAT CONTAINS THIS TRIP.
Date of Observation:I I 0
Please list any special guests that were present:
Ox-Srrr OrsnnvarroN oF THE SysrBur
Location
Number ofPassengers picked up/dropped off:
Ambulatorv
Non-Ambulatory
Was the driver on time?tr Yes No - How many minutes late/early?
Did the driver provide any passenger assistance?E Yes E No
Was the driver wearing any identification?E Yes: E unifo.rn D Name Tag
E to n"dg" E No
Did the driver render an appropriate greeting?
E Y"r I No E Driver regularly transpo(s the rider, not necessary
If CTC has a policy on seat belts, did the driver ensure the passengers were properly belted?
&YesO No
Was the vehicle neat and clean, and free from dirt, tom upholstery, damaged or broken seats,
protruding metal or other objects? E Yes D No
Is there a sign posted on the interior of the vehicle with both a local phone number and the TD
Helpline for comments/complaints/commendations? E Yes tr No
Does the vehicle have working heat and air conditioning?B Yes E No
Does the vehicle have two-way communications in good working order? E Yes tr No
If used, was the tift in good working order? t.l/p,
L 3EN roK CLN1 Lt 4 0q 6 Coro n od o ?cr Ka)
4
4
Page 45
U Yes No
I
I
4.J.1
Packet Pg. 472 Attachment: FY 2018-19 CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation Coordinator)
Was there safe and appropriate seating for all passengers?
Did the driver properly use the lift and secure the passenger? 1..[ /ff,
POss€qprs v.$<ed Onto bos
If No, please explain:
E Yes No
Yes E No
CTC:County:
Date of Ride:
Number of Round Trips Number of Riders/Beneficiaries to Survey
0 -200 30o/o
201 - 1200 llYo
l20l +50
Funding Source No.
of Trips
No. of
Riders/Beneficiaries
No. of Calls
to Make
No. of
Calls Made
CTD
Medicaid
Other
Other
Other)
Other
Totals
Page 46
Note: Attach the manifest
I
I
4.J.1
Packet Pg. 473 Attachment: FY 2018-19 CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation Coordinator)
vehicle: MV607 Driver Name: Angel . Crespo [ 5:414M - 5:50Pilll Fot:, 11241?020
StoD Time Customer Name Stop Address Conf. # Request Time Validation lnformation
3:09P N4
Pick Up
Customer Pay
$3.00
Attendants: 0 Guests: 0 Mobility: AMB
Fare Type : Assorted Cash Paid Ahead
Jewish Federation
5025 Caslello Dr #102
Naples, FL 34'103
Assistance Need:
Return Pay Tickets
885'115 2:30PM P Stop Time
Odometer
Funding Source: ADA
3:09PM Cancellation
No Show
Complete
3:38PNI
Drop Off
Attendants: 0 Guests: 0 Mobility: AMB
Daily Pass Sold
'l 148 Foxfire Ln
Naples, FL 34104
8851'15 2:30PM P Stop Time
Odometer
Funding Source: ADA
3:38PM
Assistance Need.
4:01PM
Pick Up
Customer Pay:
$1.00
Attendants: 0 Guests: 0 Mobility: AMB
Fare Type : Assorted Cash Paid Ahead
Daily Pass Sold
Golden Gate Senior Center
4898 Coronado Pkwy
Naples, FL 34116
Assistance Need
Return Pay Tickets
886375 3:30PM P Stop Time
Odometer
Funding Source: TDC
4:01PM
171587
Cancellation
No Show
Complete
4r01PM
Pick Up
Customer Pay:
-11:90Attendants: 0 Guests:0 Mobility: CANE
Fare Type: Assorted Cash Paid Ahead
Daily Pass Sold
Golden Gate Senior Center
4898 Coronado Pkwy
Naples, FL 34116
Assistance Need
Return Pay Tickets
3:30PM P Stop Time
Odometer
4,O1PM
171587
Cancellation
No Show
Complete
Funding Source: TDC
Run By Vehicle Page 10 of 12 Driver Initial:I nout"vr,g;.t'
Run: 111 [ 5:41AM - 5:50PMl
Daily Pass Sold
17'1 581
89'1110
i..)
4.J.1
Packet Pg. 474 Attachment: FY 2018-19 CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation
Vehlcl6: tlv607 Run: 111 [5!41A - 5:50Ptr1
S:top Addrcge
Drlver Name: Angol . Crg3po [ 5!414 - 5:50P 1 Fori 1l?Al2O2O
Conf,# Request Time Validatlon lnformatlon
881075 4:0PM
'171587
stdp Time Customer Name
4:0'lPM
Pick Up
Customer Pay:
s1.00
Golden Gate Senior Center
4898 Coronado Pkwy
Naples, FL 34116
3:30PM P Stop Time
Odometer
Cancellation
No Show
Complete
tr
\ttendants: 0 Guesls: 0 Mobility:AMB Assistance Need:
:are Type: Assorted ca6h Paid Ahead Return Pay Tickets
Daily Pass Sold
Funding Source; ADA
4:0'l PM
Pick Up
Customer Pay:
$r.00
Golden Gate Senior Center
4898 Coronado Pkwy
Naples, FL 341'16
742043 3:30PM P Stop Time
Odometer
4:0f M Cancellation fl
No Show
Complete
171587
qflendants: 0 Guests: 0 Mobility: AMB
Fare Type : Assorted Cash Paid Ahead Retum Pay
Daily Pass Sold
Assistance Need
Tickets
Funding Source: ADA
4:08PM 4484 30th Ave Sw
Naples, FL 34116
881075 3:30PM P Stop Time
Odomeler
4:08PM
p OffDro 171588
qttendants: 0 Guests: 0 Mobility; AMB
Daily Pass Sold
Assislance Need Funding Source: ADA
4:25PM 14950 Schooner Bay Ln apt 19203
Naples, FL 34119
742043 3:30PM P Stop Time
Odometer
4:25PM
Drop Off 17'1595
Attendanls; 0 Guests: 0 Mobility: AMB
Daily Pass Sold
Assistance Need Funding Source: ADA
L\Run By Vehicle Page 11 of 12 Driver Initial Sno,rt.rvrgpr'
l
4.J.1
Packet Pg. 475 Attachment: FY 2018-19 CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation
BJ5 ccz-zlq6 N \O3
RIDE A VEHICLE WITTN TTIE COORDINATED SYSTEM. REQUEST A
COPY OF TIIE MANIFEST PAGE TIIAT CONTAINS THIS TRIP.
Date of Observation:I 4 o
Please list any special guests that were present:
Ox-Srrn Onsrnva.rroN oF THE SysrBu
Location:
Number of Passengers picked up/dropped off:
Ambulatory
Non-Ambulatory
Was the driver on time?tr Yes E No - How many minutes late/early?
Did the driver provide any passenger assistance? B Yes No
Was the driver wearing any identification?E Yes: El uniform I Name Tag
E Io tadg" E No
Did the driver render an appropriate greeting?
E Yes ENo E Driver regularly transports the rider, not necessary
If CTC has a policy on seat belts, did the driver ensure the passengers were properly belted?
EyesE No
Was the vehicle neat and clean, and free from dirt, tom upholstery, damaged or broken seats,
protruding metal or other objects? E Yes tr No
Is there a sign posted on the interior ofthe vehicle with both a local phone number and the TD
Helpline for comments/complaints/commendations? E Yes tr No
Does the vehicle have working heat and air conditioning?B Yes No
Does the vehicle harre two-way communications in good working order? E Yes No
If used, was the lift in good working order? 1q/fi
4b 0
a
a
Page 45
I Yes No
I
u
I
I
4.J.1
Packet Pg. 476 Attachment: FY 2018-19 CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation Coordinator)
Was there safe and appropriate seating for all passengers?
Did the driver properly use the lift and secure the passenger? N/A
k:aengers wq\ked on bris
If No, please explain:
EI Yes No
EYestrNo
CTC:Countv:
Date of Ride:
\umber of Round Trips Number of Riders/Beneficiaries to Sun'ey
0 200 30%
201 1200 10%
l20l +5'.vo
Funding Source No.
of Trips
No. of
Riders/Beneficiaries
No. of Calls
to Make
No. of
Calls Made
CTD
Medicaid
Other
Other
Other)
Other
Totals
Page 46
Note: Attach the manifest
t]
4.J.1
Packet Pg. 477 Attachment: FY 2018-19 CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation Coordinator)
Vehicle; 'CG2-2196 Run:103 [ 4:49AM - 5:03PMl
Stop Time Customer Name Stop Address Conf. # Request Time Validation lnformation
1:53PN,4
Drop Off
530 18th St Se
Naples, FL 341'17
882349 1:30pM p Stop trme
Odometer
1;53PN4
13703
Attendants; 0 Guests: 0 N,4obility: AN,4BULATORY Assistance Need
Dailv Pass Sold
Funding Source: TDC
2:05PM
Drop Off
3560 Randall Blvd
Naples, FL 34120
899988 1:00PM P Stop]lme
Odometer
2:05P N.4
13709
Attendants: 1 Guests: 0 Mobility: AN/B
Daily Pass Sold
Funding Source: TDC
2:20Pli
Pick Up
Customer Pay:
$3.00
Palmetto Ridge Lane
1655 Victory Lane Rd
Naples, FL 34120
900763 2:05PM P Stop Ime
Odometer
2:20P[/
13716
Cancellation
No Show
Complete
Attendants: 0 Guests; 0 N,4obility: AMB Assistance Need:
Qsrnrnsnls;ONE - she will be in the FROIV of the school by the water towers
Fare Type: Assorted Cash Paid Ahead Return Pay Tickets
Daily Pass Sold
Funding Source: ADA
3,28 PNl
Pick Up
Customer Pay
$1.00
Golden Gate Senior Center
4898 Coronado Pkwy
Naples, FL 34116
900038 3:30pM p Stop Time
Odometer
3:28P[,4
137s0
Cancellation
No Show
Complete
Attendants: 0 Guests: 0 Mobility: WALKER Assistance Need
Fare Type: Assorted Cash Paid Ahead Return Pay Tickets
Daily Pass Sold
Funding Source: ADA
Run By Vehicle Page I of 10 Driver Initial:@n*r.rrrg#[.
Drlver Name: Cole . Fischer [ 4:49AM . 5:03PM] Fori 112412020
Assistance Need:
4.J.1
Packet Pg. 478 Attachment: FY 2018-19 CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation
Driver Name: Cole . Fischer [ 4:49AM - 5:03PM] Fori 1tZ4lZO2OVehicle: . CC2-2196 Run: 103 [ 4:49AM - 5:03PM]
Stop Address Validation lnformationStop Time Customer Name Conf. # Request Time
3:28PlV
Pick Up
Customer Pay
$1.00
Golden Gate Senior Center
4898 Coronado Pkwy
Naples, FL 34116
898103 3:00PM P Stop Time
Odometer
3:2BPM
Attendants: 0 Guests: 0 Mobility: AMB
Fare Type: Assorted Cash Paid Ahead
Daily Pass Sold
Assistance Need
Return Pay llckets
Funding Source: ADA
3:45 PN.4 12039 Sitterley St
Naples, FL 34113
Drop Off
Attendants: 0 Guests:0 Nlobility: A[,48 Assistance Need
Comments:ONE - she will be in the FROI\.4 of the school by the water towers
Daily Pass Sold
900763 2:05PM P Stop Tlme
Odometer
3:45P1\4
Funding Source: ADA
3:47 P M 954 Goodlette Rd N APT 2118
Naples, FL 34102
898103 3:00PM P Stop Ime
Odometer
3:47PM
Drop Off
Attendants: 0 Guests: 0 l\,4obility; AN.4B Assistance Need:Funding Source: ADA
Daily Pass Sold
4:20P M 11450 Whistlers Cove CirApt 421
Naples, F134113
Assistance Need
900038 4:20P14
13765Drop Off
Attendants: 0 Guests: 0 N.4obility: WALKER
Daily Pass Sold
Funding Source: ADA
Run By Vehicle Page I of 10 Driver Initial @***rE6n
13750
Cancellation !
No Show !
Comolete B
0
137 57
3:30PM P Stop Time
Odometer
4.J.1
Packet Pg. 479 Attachment: FY 2018-19 CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation
Bu5 CCZ,- 14 \0
zuDE A VEHICLE WITIN THE COORDINATED SYSTEM, REQUEST A
COPY OF T}IE MANIFEST PAGE THAT CONTAINS THIS TRIP.
Date of Observation:rlaqltoao
Please list any special guests that were present:
Ox-Srrr OssERvrrIoN oF THE Sysrsrr
Location 5l 5 EXFTUT\a-V
Number of Passengers picked up/dropped off:
Ambulatory
Non-Ambulatory
Was the driver on time?tr Yes No - Ho*'manv minutes latelearlv?
Did the driver provide any passenger assistance?E Yes D No
\\'as the drir,er uearing anv identiflcation?E Yes: fi unifo.. B Name Tag
E to eadge O No
Did the driver render an appropriate greeting?
fi Ves [No O Driver regularly transports the rider, not necessary
If CTC has a policy on seat belts, did the driver ensure the passengers were properly belted?
EYesO No
Was the vehicle neat and clean, and free from dirt. tom upholstery. damaged or broken seats,
protruding metal or other objects? E Yes I No
Is there a sign posted on the interior of the vehicle with both a local phone number and the TD
Helpline for comments/complaints/commendations? E Yes D No
Does the vehicle have working heat and air conditioning?Yes No
Does the vehicle have tlvo-rl,ay communications in good working order?Yes n No
If used. vvas the lift in good working order?U
E
E
&
I
Page 45
Yes No
I
4.J.1
Packet Pg. 480 Attachment: FY 2018-19 CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation Coordinator)
Was there safe and appropriate seating for all passengers?
Did the driver properly use the lift and secure the passenger?
If No, please explain:
CTC:
Date of Ride:
EYesENo
EI Yes No
County:
Funding Source No.
of Trips
No. of
Riders/Beneficiaries
No. of Calls
to Make
No. of
Calls Made
CTD
Medicaid
Other
Other
Other)
Other
Totals
Number of Round Trips Number of Riders/Beneficiaries to Survey
0-200 30%
201 - 1200 t0%
1201 +5%
Page 46
Note: Attach the manifest
u
4.J.1
Packet Pg. 481 Attachment: FY 2018-19 CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation Coordinator)
Vshlcle: B3l€laval
1110
Run: 108 [ 5r344il. 5:24PMl Dr|ver Namo: Franclaco . Lopoz [ 5:34AIt .
C:24Pill
Fori 1nqi2020
Stop Tlme Customer Namo Stop Addrcss Conf.# Reque.t Tlme Valldatlon lnfomatlon
1'l:'l0AM
Pick Up
Customer Pay:
$3.00
8507 Laurel Lakes Cv Gate code 1934
Naples, FL 34'l l 9
795203 12;00PM D Stop'Time
Odometer
'11:1oAM
182335
Cancellation
No Show
Complete
Attendants; 0 Guests: 0
Comments:at the gym
Fare Type: Assorted
Daily Pass Sold
Mobility: ELECTRIC WC Assistance Need
Cash Paid Ahead Return Pay llckets
Funding Source: ADA
11:33AM
Drop Off
YMCA
5450 YMCA RD 597-3148 EXT.375
NAPLES, FL 34109
795203 12:00PM D Stop Time
Odomeler
11:334M
182344
Attendants: 0 Guests: 0 Mobility: ELECTRIC WC Assistance Need:
Comments:at the gym
Daily Pass Sold
Funding Source: ADA
11 :54AM
Pick Up
Customer Pay:
$3.00
ARA-NAPLES DIALYSIS CENTER
4529 Executive Dr 56&7180-(+30 minutes, machine
time)
Naples, FL 34119
88A252 1l:45AM P Stop Time
Odometer
11:54AM
182351
Cancellation
No Show
Complete
Attendants: 0 Guests: 0 N4obility: WHEELCHAIR Assistance Need:
FareType: Assorted Cash PaidAhead Return Pay Tickets
Daily Pass Sold
Funding Source: ADA
12:23PM
Drop Off
The Arlington of Naples
8000 Arlington Circle Romm 3119
Naples, FL 34113
848252 11:45AM P Sbp Tlme
Odometer
12:23PM
182366
Attendants: 0 Guests: 0 Mobility: WHEELCHAIR Assistance Need:
Daily Pass Sold
Funding Source: ADA
& Faratransit Run By Vehicle Page 4 of 8 Driver Initial:S***rgpn
l
4.J.1
Packet Pg. 482 Attachment: FY 2018-19 CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation
b\)5 ccz-ztT+tae
RIDE A VEHICLE WITIN T}IE COORDINATED SYSTEM. REQUEST A
COPY OF TI{E MANIFEST PAGE THAT CONTAINS THIS TzuP.
Date of Observation t Ia{ laoao
Please list any special guests that were present
ON-SIrs OnsrRva,rroN oF THE Sysrrnr
Location:270 frn (',I +
Number of Passengers picked up/dropped off:
Ambulatorv
Non-Ambulatorv
Was the driver on time? tr Yes No - Ho*' many minutes late/early?
Did the driver provide any passenger assistance? E Yes E N*o
Was the driver wearing any identification?E Yes: El unifo.. D Name Tag
B Io eudg" I No
Did the driver render an appropriate greeting?
E y"r [No E Drir., regularly transpo(s the rider, not necessary
If CTC has a policy on seat belts, did the driver ensure the passengers were properly belted?
mYestrNo
Was the vehicle neat and clean, and free from dirt, tom upholstery, damaged or broken seats.
protruding metal or other objects? E Yes tr No
Is there a sign posted on the interior ofthe vehicle with both a local phone number and the TD
Helpline for comments/complaints/commendations? A Yes tr No
Does the vehicle have working heat and air conditioning?Yes No
Does the vehicle have two-way communications in good working order? Yes No
If used. was the lift in good working order?
g
E
ut
I
I
Page 45
Yes
I
NoD
4.J.1
Packet Pg. 483 Attachment: FY 2018-19 CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation Coordinator)
Funding Source No.
of Trips
No. of
Riders/Beneficiaries
No. of Calls
to Make
No. of
Calls Made
CTD
Medicaid
Other
Other
Other)
Other
Totals
Was there safe and appropriate seating for all passengers?
Did the driver properly use the lift and secure the passenger?
If No, please explain:
EYesENo
EYesENo
CTC:County:Collier
Date of Ride:
Number of Round Trips Number of Riders/Beneficiaries to Survey
0-200 30%
201 - 1200 l0o/o
l20l +s%o
Page 46
Note: Attach the manifest
4.J.1
Packet Pg. 484 Attachment: FY 2018-19 CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation Coordinator)
Vehlcle: CC2.2197 Run: 102 [ 3:44All - 3:4lPMl Drlver Name:Eugenlo . Roddguez [ 3:44AU .
3:41Pt4
For 1nq2u20
StbP Tlme Customer Name Stop AddrEsB Conf. # Request Tlm6 Valldatlon lnformatlon
8:57AM
Pick Up
Customer Pay:
$3.00
2167 43rd Ln Sw
Naples, FL34116
760900 9:40AM D Stop lime
Odometor
8:57AM
23537
Cancellalion
No Show
Complete
Attendants: 0 Guests: 0 N4obility: WHEELCHAIR Assistance Need:
Fare Type: Assorted Cash Paid Ahead Rstum Pay Tickets
Funding Source: ADA
Daily Pass Sold
9:244M
Drop Off
North Naples Oialysis
1750 Sw Health Pkwy
Naples, FL 34109
760900 9:40AM D Stop'1me
Odometer
9:24AM
23549
Attendants: 0 Guests: 0 Mobility: WHEELCHAIR Assistance Need:
Daily Pass Sold
Funding Source: ADA
9:49AM
Pick Up
Customer Pay:
$4.00
68 gth St
Bonita Springs, FL 34'i 34
800824 10:15AM D Stop Ime
Odometer
9:49AM
23556
Cancellation
No Show
Complete
Atlendants: 0 Guests: 0 Mobility: WHEELCHAIR Assistance Need:
Fare Type : Assorted Cash Paid Ahead Return Pay Tickets
Daily Pass Sold
Funding Source: TDC
10:09AM
Drop Off
next to lab corp unit -22
2700 lmmokalee Rd unit -22 592-011'l
Naples, FL 34109
800824 10:15AM D Stop fime
Odometer
'10:09AM
23563
Attendants: 0 Guests: 0 Nlobility: WHEELCHAIR Assistance Need:
Daily Pass Sold
Funding Source: TDC
& Paratransit Run By Vehicle Page 5 of 9 Driver Initial S*."r.rgpo
4.J.1
Packet Pg. 485 Attachment: FY 2018-19 CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation
CCz^-t4tO RUN tO
RIDE A VEHICLE W]TIN TT{E COORDINATED SYSTEM. REQUEST A
COPY OF THE MAMFEST PAGE THAT CONTAINS THIS TRIP.
Date of Observation:a aoao
Please list any special guests that were present:
Ox-SrrB Onspnv.q.rroN oF THE Sysrnpr
Location:W00DSiDE 1ANE5.,8525 nodio Rod
Number ofPassengers picked up/dropped off:
Ambulatory
Non-Ambulatory
Was the driver on time?Yes E No - How many minutes late/early?
Did the driver provide any passenger assistance?Yes u No
Was the driver wearing any identification?I Yes: El unifo.- E Name Tag
E neadge E No
Did the driver render an appropriate greeting?
El y"r UNo O Driver regularly transports the rider, not necessary
If CTC has a policy on seat belts, did the driver ensure the passengers were properly belted?
EYestr No
Was the vehicle neat and clean, and free from dirt, tom upholstery, damaged or broken seats,
protruding metal or other objects? E Yes tr No
ls there a sign posted on the interior of the vehicle with both a local phone number and the TD
Helpline for comments/complaints/commendations? E Yes E No
Does the vehicle have working heat and air conditioning?E Yes No
Does the vehicle have two-way communications in good working order? E Yes No
If used, was the lift in good working order?E
I
I
Page 45
Yes
tr
No
TI
I
I
4.J.1
Packet Pg. 486 Attachment: FY 2018-19 CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation Coordinator)
Was there safe and appropriate seating for all passengers?
Did the driver properly use the lift and secure the passenger?
If No, please explain:
E Yes No
A Yes No
CTC:County:
Date of Ride:
Number of Round Trips Number of Riders/Beneficiaries to Survey
0-200 30%
201 - 1200 t0v,
1201 +50
Funding Source No.
of Trips
No. of
Riders/Beneficiaries
No. of Calls
to Make
No. of
Calls Made
CTD
Medicaid
Other
Other
Other)
Other
Totals
Page 46
Note: Attach the manifest
I
I
4.J.1
Packet Pg. 487 Attachment: FY 2018-19 CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation Coordinator)
Vehicle: 831-Glaval
1410
Run: 108 [ 5:34AM - 5:24PMI Driver Name:Francisco . Lopez [ 5:34AM -
5:24PMl
Fot:'112412020
Stop Time Customer Name Stop Address Conf. # Request Time Validation lnformation
12:46PM
Pick Up
Customer Pay:
$3.00
14731NAUTILUS PL
Naples, FL 34114
900662 12:'l5PM P Stop Time
Odometer
'12:46P[.4
182373
Cancellation
No Show
Complete
Attendants: 0 Guests: 0 N,4obility: ELECTRIC WC Assistance Need
Fare Type: Assorted Cash Paid Ahead Return Pay llckets
Daily Pass Sold
Funding Source: ADA
1:14P1'A
Drop Off
WOODSIDE LANES
8525 Radio Rd 455-3755
Naples, FL 34'104
900662 '12:lsPM P Stop Time
Odometer
1:14PN,4
182344
Attendants: 0 Guests: 0 [Iobility: ELECTRIC WC Assistance Need:
Daily Pass Sold
Funding Source: ADA
1:57Pll
Pick Up
Customer Pay
$3.00
ARA-Naples South Dialysis
4270 famiami ftail E Naples ofAVALON DR. near
Thomasson.
Naples, FL 34112
896025 1:30PM P Stop Time
Odometer
1:57PN,l
'182393
Attendants: 0 Guests: 0 Mobility: AMB
Fare Type : Assorted Cash Paid Ahead
Daily Pass Sold
Assistance Need
Return Pay llckets
Funding Source: ADA
2:1 I P [.4
Drop Off
896025 1:30PM P Stop "6me
Odometer
2:1gPN/
182399
Attendants: 0 Guests: 0 Mobility: AMB
Daily Pass Sold
Assistance Need:Funding Source: ADA
Run By Vehicle Page 5 of I Driver Initial S*."..rgpg.
Cancellation I
No Show I
Complete I
3382 Dorado Way
Naples, FL 34'105
4.J.1
Packet Pg. 488 Attachment: FY 2018-19 CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation
BU5 CL-B EUN 3B
RIDE A VEHICLE WITIN THE COORDINATED SYSTEM. REQIJEST A
COPY OF THE MANIFEST PAGE THAT CONTAINS THIS TRIP.
Date of Observation:tlztltozo
Please list any special guests that $,ere present:
Ox-SlrB OnssnvA.rroN oF THE Sysrnu
Location:
\umber of Passengers picked up/dropped olf:
Ambulatorv
Non-Ambulatory
Was the driver on time? E Yes D No - How many minutes late/early?
Did the driver provide any passenger assistance? El Yes O No
Was the driver wearing any identification?ts Yes: E unifo.* [ Name Tag
EI Io eaage I No
Did the driver render an appropriate greeting?
& y.. I No E Driver regularly transports the rider. not necessary
If CTC has a policy on seat belts, did the driver ensure the passengers were properly belted?
EYesI No
Was the vehicle neat and clean, and free from dirt, torn upholstery, damaged or broken seats,
protruding metal or other objects? E Yes tr No
Is there a sign posted on the interior oflthe vehicle with both a local phone number and the TD
Helpline for comments/complaints/commendations? B| Yes O No
Does the vehicle have working heat and air conditioning?E Yes I
DDoes the vehicle have two-way communications in good working order? E Yes No
If used, was the lift in good working order?
A.IS ExE.E
Z
2
Page 45
8l Yes tr No
No
4.J.1
Packet Pg. 489 Attachment: FY 2018-19 CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation Coordinator)
Was there safe and appropriate seating for all passengers?
Did the driver properly use the lift and secure the passenger?
If No, please explain:
CTC:
Date of Ride:
E Yes tr No
EYesENo
County:
Funding Source No.
of Trips
No. of
Riders/Beneficiaries
No. of Calls
to Make
No. of
Calls Made
CTD
Medicaid
Other
Other
Other)
Other
Totals
Number of Round Trips Number of Riders/Beneficiaries to Survey
0-200 30o/o
201 - t200 t0%
1201 +5%
Page 46
Note: Attach the manifest
4.J.1
Packet Pg. 490 Attachment: FY 2018-19 CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation Coordinator)
Vehicle: 836-Glaval
1844
Run:138 [ 7:13AM - 6:45PM]Driver Name: Yvonne. Rivera [ 7:13AM - 6:45PMl Foti 112412020
Stop Time Customer Name Stop Address Conf. # Request Time Validation lnformation
1O:17AM
Drop Off
PUBLIX
4370 Thomasson Dr
Naples, FL 34112
900776 9:59AM P Stop f-ime
Odometer
10:1 7AI\/
108094
Attendants: 0 Guests: 0 Mobility: ANIBULATORY Assistance Need:
Daily Pass Sold
Funding Source: ADA
'1 0:3BAN/]
Drop Off
Attendants: 0 Guests: 0 Mobility: AN,1B
Daily Pass Sold
ARBY'S RESTAURANT
2436 Pine Ridge Rd 434-2264
Naples, FL 34109
859606 10:30AM D Stop Time
Odometer
10:3BAll
108102
Assistance Need
Pick Up
Customer Pay
$3.00
841't89 '10:15AM P Stop Time
Odometer
10:54AM
108'1 07
Canceilation
No Show
Complele
Daily Pass Sold
Pick Up
Customer Pay:
$1.00
Daily Pass Sold
ARA-NAPLES DIALYSIS CENTER
4529 Executive Dr 56&7180-(+30 minutes, machine
time)
Naples, FL 34119
7 43152 10:00AM P Stop T'ime
Odometer
11:10AN.4
108109
Cancellation
No Show
Complete
Funding Source: ADA
i&Run By Vehicle Page 4 of 10 Driver Initial:@*",r*rggo.
Funding Source: TDC
10:54AN,4 next to lab corp unit -22
2700 Immokalee Rd unil -22 592-0111
Naples, FL 34109
Funding Source: ADAAttendants: 0 Guests: 0 Mobility: AMB Assistance Need:
Fare Type : Assorted Cash Paid Ahead Return Pay Tickets
11 :10At\.4
Attendants: 0 Guests: 0 [,lobility: CANE Assistance Need:
FareType: Assorted Cash Paid Ahead Return Pay Tickets
4.J.1
Packet Pg. 491 Attachment: FY 2018-19 CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation
Vehicle: 836-Glaval
1844
Driver Name: Yvonne. Rlvera [ 7:13AM - 6:45Plv[ Fott l |Z4|ZOZORun:138 [7:13AM - 6:45PM]
Conf. # Request TimeStop Address Validation lnformation
Pick Up
Customer Pay:
$1.00
ARA-NAPLES DIALYSIS CENTER
4529 Executive Dr 56&718G(+30 minutes, machine
time)
Naples, FL34119
10:00AM P Stop Time
Odometer
11124M
1081 09
Cancellation
No Show
Complete
Attendants: 0 cuests:o Mobility: AN4B
Fare Type; Assorted Cash Paid Ahead
Assistance Need
Return Pay llckets
Funding Source: TDC
'11:3gAM
Drop Off
1320 Sanctuary Rd W
Naples, FL 34120
841189 10:15AM P Stop Ttme
Odometer
Funding Source: ADA
11.39AN.4
108125
Attendants: 0 Guests: 0 N.4obility: Al\,4B
Daily Pass Sold
Assistance Need:
'12:01 PN4
Drop Off
550 Hope Cir #101
lmmokalee, FL 34'142
10:00AM P Stop Time
Odometer
12:01PN.4
108139
Attendants: 0 Guests: 0 Mobility: AMB
Daily Pass Sold
12:1 oPNil
Drop Off
136 Anhinga Cir #3
lmmokalee, FL 34142
7 43152 10:00AM P Stop T'ime
Odometer
12:1 0P N/l
108142
Attendants: 0 Guests: 0 Mobility: CANE Assistance Need Funding Source: ADA
L(}Run By Vehicle Page 5 of 10 Snortervrggn
Stop Time Customer Name
11.124M 741226
Daily Pass Soid
781226
Ass stance Need:Funding Source:TDC
Daily Pass Sold
Driver Initial:
4.J.1
Packet Pg. 492 Attachment: FY 2018-19 CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation
BuSr cca-a3115 Rur..t. rr6
zuDE A VEHICLE WITIN THE COORDINATED SYSTEM, REQUEST A
COPY OF THE MANIFEST PAGE TI{AT CONTAINS THIS TzuP.
Date of Observation:l13\,ao)o
Please list any special guests that \4,ere present:
Ox-Srrr Osspnv,\rtoN oF THE Sysrrm
Dov,Location:
Number of Passengers picked up/dropped off
Ambulatory
Non-Ambulatory
Was the driver on time? E Yes o No - How manv minutes late/earlv?
Did the driver provide any passenger assistance? El Yes tr No
Was the driver wearing any identification?A Yes: EI unifo.. D Name Tag
E to oadg" I No
Did the driver render an appropriate greeting?
E[y"r DNo EDriver regularly transports the rider, not necessary
If CTC has a policy on seat belts, did the driver ensure the passengers were properly belted?
dYesE
Was the vehicle neat and clean, and free from dirt, tom upholstery, damaged or broken seats,
protruding metal or other objects? E Yes D No
Is there a sign posted on the interior ofthe vehicle with both a local phone number and the TD
Helpline for comments/complaints/commendations? E Yes E No
Does the vehicle have working heat and air conditioning?E Yes No
Does the vehicle have two-way communications in good working order?tr Yes I No
If used, u,as the lift in good workinS order? \/fi
Page 45
Yes No
No
tr
ED
4.J.1
Packet Pg. 493 Attachment: FY 2018-19 CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation Coordinator)
Was there safe and appropriate seating for all passengers?A Yes u No
Did the driver properly use the lift and secure the passenger? \|/fi D Yes E
If No. please explain:
CTC:County:
Date of Ride:
Number of Round Trips Number of Riders/Beneficiaries to Survev0 200 30%
201 - 1200 10%
1201 +5%
Funding Source No.
of Trips
No. of Calls
to Make
No. of
Calls Made
CTD
Medicaid
Other
Other
Other)
Other
Totals
Page 46
Note: Attach the manifest
No
No. of
Riders/Beneficiaries
4.J.1
Packet Pg. 494 Attachment: FY 2018-19 CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation Coordinator)
Vehicle: CC2-2345 Run: 115 [ 5:45AM - 6:00Pil[Driver Name; Fredrick . Lyons [ 5:45AM - 6:00PM For: '113112O20
Stop Time Customer Name Stop Address Gonf. # Request Time Validation lnformation
9:4sAM
Drop Off
Attendants: 0 Guests: 0 Mobility: AI\,B
Daily Pass Sold
2650 Airport Pulling Rd S
Naples, FL 34112
884307 9;45AM
6706
Assistance Need:Funding Source: ADA
9:58AM
Pick Up
Customer Pay:
$3.00
Lakewood Manor Care
3601 lakewood blvd Pin 0315
Naples, FL 34112
9:304M P Stop Time
Odometer
9:5BA[I Cancellation
No Show
Complete
Attendants: 0 Guests:0 Nlobility: AMB
Fare Type : Assorted Cash Paid Ahead
Daily Pass Sold
Assistance Need:
Return Pay Tickets
Funding Source: ADA
10:05AM
Drop Off
bank of America
4898 Davis Blvd
Naples, FL 34104
902275 9:30AM P Stop Time
Odometer
10:05Ali1
6709
Attendants: 0 Guests: 0 Mobility: AMB
Daily Pass Sold
Assistance Need:Funding Source: ADA
10r'17AN.4
Pick Up
Customer Pay
$3.00
Atenaanti:--ii
DAVIS KIDNEY CENTER-code#os
6625 HILLWAY ClR. 77r945+(+3O minutes, machine
time)
Naples, FL 341'12
858653 10:00AM P Stop Time
Odomeler
10:174lM
6710
Cancellation
No Show
Complete
Guests: 0
Fare Type: Assorted Cash
Daily Pass Sold
Mobility: AMB
Paid Ahead Return Pay
Assistance Need: Visually lmpaired ILEGALLY
BLIND,NEEDS ASSISTANCE.]
Tickets
Funding Source: ADA
'L
Run By Vehicle Page 4 of 9 Driver Initial S no,,t"lt t.t.
9:30AM D Stop Time
Odometer
902275
4.J.1
Packet Pg. 495 Attachment: FY 2018-19 CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation
Vehicle: CC2-2345 Run: 116 [ 5:4.5AM - 6:00PMl Driver Name: Fredrick. Lyons [ 5:45AM - 6:00PM For:113112020
Stop Time Gustomer Name Stop Address Conf. # Request Time Validation Information
'10:28AM
Drop Off
Attendants: 0 Guests: 0 lvlobility: AIMB
Daily Pass Sold
200 Henley Dr
Naples, FL 34104
10:00AM P Stop Time
Odometer 6713
Pick Up
Customer Pay:
s1.00
Attendants: 0 Guests:o
Comments:SUITE 101
Fare Type : Assorted
Daily Pass Sold
5518 Greenwood Cir. Lot-s Gate code #1922
Naples, FL 34112
9O2OOZ 1:49PM D Stop Time
Odometer
1:03PNI Cancellation
No Show
Complete
6729
Mobility: AMB Assistance Need
Cash Paid Ahead Return Pay Tickets
Funding Sourcei ADA
'1 :31P[4
Drop Off
Attendants: 0 Guests:o lvobility: AMB
Comments:SUITE '101
Daily Pass Sold
Dr. Waynne
1735 Sw Health Pk\,vy
Naples, FL 34109
Assistance Need
9O2OOZ 1:49PM D Stop Time
Odometer
Funding Source: ADA
1:3lPN4
6743
2:'loPM
Pick Up
Customer Pay:
$4.00
ett"noinii' o--'- breils: o
Fare Type: Assorted
Daily Pass Sold
PUBLIX PEBBLE BROOK
15265 COLLTER BLVD. 348-2931
Naples, FL 34119
860822 2:00PM P Stop Time
odometer 67 49
2:10PM Cancellation
No Show
Complete
Nilobility: AIVIB
Cash Paid Ahead
Assistance Need:
Retum Pay Tickets
Funding Source: TDC
;\,Run By Vehicle Driver Initial RouteMatch
Soltware"
10:28A14
Assistance Need: Visually lmpaired ILEGALLY
BLIND,NEEDS ASSISTANCE.I
Funding Source: ADA
858653
1 :03PM
Page 5 of 9
4.J.1
Packet Pg. 496 Attachment: FY 2018-19 CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation
BUS: Cca-a3q: RuN,no
zuDE A VEHICLE WITIN THE COORDINATED SYSTEM. REQUEST A
COPY OF THE MANIFEST PAGE TTIAT CONTAINS THIS TRIP.
Date of Observation
Please list any special guests that were present:
ON-SIrr OrsrRvauoN oF THE Sysrplr
zozo
L (t?MA R. CA E 36ot Lq BILocation:
Number of Passengers picked up/dropped off:
Ambulatory
Non-Ambulatory
Was the driver on time?E Yes No - How many minutes late/early?
Did the driver provide any passenger assistance? El Yes No
Was the driver wearing any identification?E Yes: E[ uniforrn E Name Tag
El Io eudg" E No
Did the driver render an appropriate greeting?
EIY". UNo E Drir", regularly transports the rider, not necessary
If CTC has a policy on seat belts, did the driver ensure the passengers were properly belted?
SYesD No
Was the vehicle neat and clean, and free from dirt, tom upholstery, damaged or broken seats,
protruding metal or other objects? E[ y"r E No
Is there a sign posted on the interior ofthe vehicle with both a local phone number and the TD
Helpline for comments/complaints/commendations? E Yes E No
Does the vehicle have *,orking heat and air conditioning?K Yes No
Does the vehicle have two-way communications in good working order? E( Yes No
If used, was the lift in good working order? Ll/A
\
I
Page 45
Yes No
E
E
4.J.1
Packet Pg. 497 Attachment: FY 2018-19 CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation Coordinator)
Was there safe and appropriate seating for all passengers? ts Yes E
Didthe driver properly usethe liftand secure the passengert fi/fi E Yes I
If No, please explain:
CTC:County:
Date of fude:
No
No
Funding Sou rce No.
of Trips
No. of
Riders/Beneficiaries
No. of Calls
to Make
No. of
Calls Made
Medicaid
Other)
Other
Totals
Number of Round Trips Number of Riders/Beneficiaries to Suney
0-200 30%
20t -1200 l0o/o
t20l -5%
Page 46
Note: Attach the manifest
CTD
Other
Other
I
4.J.1
Packet Pg. 498 Attachment: FY 2018-19 CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation Coordinator)
Vehic,e: CC2-2345 Run: 1'16 [ 5:454M - 6:00P tJ Driver Name: Fredrick . Lyons [ 5:45AM - 6:00PM Foti 'll3'U2O2O
Stop Time Customer Name Stop Address Conf. # Request Time Validation lnformation
9:45Alvl
Drop Off
2650 Airport Pulling Rd S
Naples, FL 34112
9:30AM D Stop Time
Odometer
9:45AM
6706
Attendantsi 0 Guests: 0 Mobility: AMB
Daily Pass Sold
Funding Source: ADA
9:5BAM
Pick Up
Customer Pay;
$3.00
lakewood Manor Care
3601 lakewood blvd Pin 0315
Naples, FL 341 12
9:30AM P Stop Time
Odometer
9:58AM
6707
Cancellation
No Show
Complete
Attendants: 0 Guests:0 Mobility: AMB
Fare Type: Assorted Cash Paid Ahead
Daily Pass Sold
Assislance Need
Return Pay Tickets
Funding Source: ADA
10:05AM
Drop Off
bank of America
4898 Davis Blvd
Naples, FL 34104
902275 9:30AM P Stop Time
Odometer
Funding Source: ADA
'10:05A14
6709
Attendants: 0 Guests: 0 Mobility: AMB
Daily Pass Sold
Assistance Need
10:'1 7AM
Pick Up
Customer Pay:
$3.00
DAVIS KIDNEY CENTER-code#os
6625 HILLWAY ClR. 7719454-(+30 minules, machine
time)
Naples, FL 34.112
858653 lo:ooAM P Slop Time
Odometer
10.'17At{
6710
Cancellation
No Show
Complele
Attendants: 0 Guests: 0
Fare Type: Assoried Cash
Daily Pass Sold
Mobility: AMB
Paid Ahead Return Pay
Assistance Need: Visually lmpaired ILEGALLY
BLIND,NEEDS ASSISTANCE.]
Tickets
Funding Source: ADA
L'Run By Vehicle Page 4 of 9 Driver Initial RouteMatch
Solttare'
884307
Assistance Need:
902275
4.J.1
Packet Pg. 499 Attachment: FY 2018-19 CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation
RIDE A VEHICLE WITIN THE COORDINATED SYSTEM. REQUEST A
COPY OF THE MAMFEST PAGE TFIAT CONTAINS THIS TRIP.
Date of Observation:llztlzozo
Please list any special guests that were present
Or-Srrr OssrRvA.rloN oF THE Sysruu
Location B6t5 3o.ot h'rve
Number of Passengers picked up/dropped off
Ambulatory
Non-Ambulatorv
Was the driver on time? E Yes e No - How many minutes late/earlv?t5 Mrnunes lqte
Didthedriverprovideanypassengerassistance? ( y* E No
El' Y.r, Vunitor.
{roruor" E wo
E Name Tag
Did the driver render an appropriate greeting?
&", E No E Drin.. regularly transports the rider, not necessary
If CTC has a policy on seat belts, did the driver ensure the passengers were properly belted?
E/ v", E
Ifused. was the lift in good working order? \l/ft
No
Was the vehicle neat and clean, and free from dirt. tom upholstery, damaged or broken seats,
protruding metal or other objects? W'y", E No
ls there a sign posted on the interior ofthe vehicle with both a local phone number and the TD
Helpline for comments/complaints/commendations? { V"" tr No
Does the vehicle have working heat and air conditioning? ( r", E No
/
Does the vehicle have two-way communications in good working order? E( Yes tr No
\
Page 45
I Yes t] No
Blh'Cct-zzqs RVN: r\ 6
Was the driver wearing any identification?
4.J.1
Packet Pg. 500 Attachment: FY 2018-19 CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation Coordinator)
Was there safe and appropriate seating for all passengers?(Yes No
u Yes I NoDid the driver properly use the lift and secure the passenger?
N/A
If No, please explain:
CTC:County:
Date of Ride:
Number of Round Trips J{umber of Riders/Beneficiaries to Suriey
3lYo
201 1200 10%
l20l +5Yo
Funding Source No.
of Trips
No. of
Riders/Beneficiaries
No. of Calls
to Make
No. of
Calls Made
CTD
Medicaid
Other
Other
Other)
Other
Totals
Page 46
Note: Attach the manifest
E
0-200
4.J.1
Packet Pg. 501 Attachment: FY 2018-19 CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation Coordinator)
Driver Name: Fredrick . Lyons [ 5:45AM - 6:0OPM Fot: 1l31lZO2OVehiclq: CC2-2345 Run: 116 [ 5:45AM - 6:00Pft4
Stop Address Validation lnformationStop Time Customer Name
8:17 AM
Drop Off
Attendants: 0 Guests: O Mobility: AMB
WINN DIXIE GOLDEN GATE
4849 Golden Gate Pkwy Unknown
Naples, FL 341'16
Assistance Need
902306 8:04AM P Stop Time
Odometer
8:'l7AM
6693
Funding Source: ADA
8:23AM
Drop Off
Attendants: 0 Guesls: 0 Mobility: AMB
Daily Pass Sold
DAVID LAWRENCE
6075 BATHEY LN. BU|LD|NG C(45r8500)
Naples, FL 34116
902291 8:23AM D Stop Time
Odometer
Funding Source: ADA
8:23AM
6695
8:40AM
Break Start
COLLIER AREA PARA TRANSIT
8300 Radio Rd
Naples, FL 34'104
Stop Time
Odometer
Daily Pass Sold
9:05AM
Break End
COLLIER AREA PARA TRANSIT
8300 Radio Rd
Naples, FL 34'104
Stop Time
Odometer
Daily Pass Sold
9:26Alil
Pick Up
Customer Pay:
!1:oi
Attendants: 0 Guests: 0 Mobility:AMB
Fare Type: Assorted Cash Paid Ahead
8615 Barot Dr #104
Naples, FL 34104
Assistance Need
Return Pay Tickets
884307 9:304M D Stop Time
Odomeler
9:264M
6699
Cancellation
No Show
Complete
Funding Source: ADA
Daily Pass Sold
Run By Vehicle Page 3 of 9 Driver Initial ffi nurt.rvrut.t.
Gonf. # Request Time
Daily Pass Sold
Assistance Need:
1-lr
4.J.1
Packet Pg. 502 Attachment: FY 2018-19 CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation
Driver Name: Fredrick. Lyons [ 5:45AM - 6:00PM Fot: 113'U2o2oRun: 116 [ 5:/t5AM - 6:00PltllVehicle: CC2-2345
Stop Time Customer Name validation lnformationStop Address Conf. # Request Time
9:45A[I
Drop Off
Attendants: 0 Guests: 0 Mobility: AMB
Daily Pass Sold
9:45AM
6706
Funding Source: ADA
Pick Up
Customer Pay
Lakewood Manor Care
3601lakewood blvd Pin 0315
Naples, FL 34112
902275 9:30AM P Stop Time
Odometer 6707
9:58ANi Cancellation
No Show
Complete
$3.00
Attendants: 0 Guests: 0 Nlobility: AMB
Fare Type : Assorted Cash Paid Ahead
Daily Pass Sold
Assistance Need:
Return Pay Tickels
Funding Source: ADA
10:05AM
Drop Off
Attendants: 0 Guests: 0 Mobility: AMB
Daily Pass Sold
bank of America
4898 Davis Blvd
Naples, FL 34'104
902275 9:30AM P Stop Time
Odometer
'10:05AM
6709
Funding Source:ADA
10:'17AN4
Pick Up
Customer Pay
t3.00
Attendants: 0 Guests: 0
Fare Type: Assorted Cash
Dajly Pass Sold
DAVIS KIDNEY CENTER-code#os
6625 HILLWAY ClR 77t945+(+30 minutes' machine
time)
Naples, FL 34112
Assistance Need: Visually lmpaired ILEGALLY
BLIND,NEEDS ASSISTANCE,]
Return Pay Tickets
858653 10:00AM P Stop Time
Odometer 6710
'10:17AM Cancellation
No Show
Complete
Mobili9: AMB
L Paid Ahead
Funding Source: ADA
Page 4 of 9 Driver Initial S n",t.q3,gl
2650 Airport Pulling Rd S
Naples, FL 34112
884307 9:30AM D Stop Time
Odometer
Assistance Need:
9:58AM
Assistance Need:
I
Run By Vehicle
4.J.1
Packet Pg. 503 Attachment: FY 2018-19 CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation
BU5: t0q5 qsp. 16l
RIDE A VEHICLE WITIN THE COORDINATED SYSTEM. REQUEST A
COPY OF THE MAMFEST PAGE T}IAT CONTAINS THIS TRIP.
Date of Observation:llstlzoao
Please list any special guests that were present:
Ox-SIrB OssrnvA,tIoN oF TEE Sysrru
Location:BRAVO A66b Tarnictrn\ tro.,
Number ofPassengers picked up/dropped off:
Ambulatorv
Non-Ambulatory
Was the driver on time? tr Yes No - How many minutes late/early?
Did the driver provide any passenger assistance? K Yes E No
Was the driver wearing any identification?B Yes: I Unifor- O Name Tag
E ID Budg" E No
Did the driver render an appropriate greeting?
E y". O No E Driver regularly transports the rider, not necessary
lf CTC has a policy on seat belts, did the driver ensure the passengers were properly belted?
EYesE No
Was the vehicle neat and clean, and free from dirt, tom upholstery, damaged or broken seats,
protruding metal or other objects? E Yes E No
Is there a sign posted on the interior ofthe vehicle with both a local phone number and the TD
Helpline for comments/complaints/commendations? E Yes O No
Does the vehicle have working heat and air conditioning?Yes No
Does the vehicle have two-way communications in good working order? Yes E
E
No
If used, was the lift in good working order? \/[
E
tr
I
t
Page 45
Yes No
I
I
4.J.1
Packet Pg. 504 Attachment: FY 2018-19 CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation Coordinator)
Was there safe and appropriate seating for all passengers?Yes I No
Did the driver properly use the lift and secure the purr.ng"rt 'N/ A Yes E No
If No, please explain:
CTC:County:
Date of Ride:
Number of Round Trips \umber of Riders/Beneficiaries to Survey0 200 30%
201 - 1200 t0%
1201 +
E.
E
Funding Sou rce No.
of Trips
No. of
Riders/Beneficiaries
No. of
Calls Made
CTD
Medicaid
Other
Other
Other)
Othcr
Totals
Page 46
Note: Attach the manifest
No. of Calls
to Make
4.J.1
Packet Pg. 505 Attachment: FY 2018-19 CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation Coordinator)
Vehicle: 837-Glaval
't 845
Run: 101 [ 3:00AM - 4:45PMl Driver Name: Andy Ramtahal [ 3:00AM - 4:45Pi4 Foti 1l31l2O2O
Stop Time Customer Name Conf. # Request Time Validation lnformation
2:.12PM 901269BRAVO
2668 Tamiami Trl E
Naples, FL 34112
2:00PM P Stop Time
Odometer
2.12P1\l
101735
Cancellation
No Show
Complete
Pick Up
Customer Pay
$ 1.00
Attendants: 0 Guests: 0 Mobility: AMB Assistance Need:
Comments:SUITE 310
Fare Type : Assorted Cash Paid Ahead Return Pay Tickets
Daily Pass Sold
Funding Source: ADA
2:52PM
Drop Off
448 Golden Gate Blvd W
Naples, FL 34117
Assistance Need
90'1269 2:00PM P Stop Time
Odometer
2:52PM
101752
Daily Pass Sold
lMobility: AN4B Funding Source: ADA
3:11PM
Pick Up
Customer Pay
$1.00
Attendants: 0 Guests: 0 l\.4obility: AMB
Fare Type : Assorted Cash Paid Ahead
Goodwill
8915 Sage Ave Off lmmokalee Rd and Collier Blvd.
Naples, FL 34120
900052 3:10PM P Stop Time
Odometer
Funding Source: TDC
3:11PlM Cancellation
No Show
Complete
Assislance Need:
Return Pay Tickets
3:32PM
Drop Off
Attendants: 0 Guests: 0 Mobility: AMB
3295 Twilight Ln APT 5301 GATECODE- #8S93
Naples, FL 34109
Assistance Need
900052 3:iOPM p Stop Time
Odometer
Funding Source: TDC
3:32PN4
101764
Run By Vehicle Page 10 of 11 Driver Initial $ nort.rvrrt.t
Stop Address
Attendants: 0 Guesls: 0
Comments:SUITE 310
101757
Daily Pass Sold
Daily Pass Sold
(:t
4.J.1
Packet Pg. 506 Attachment: FY 2018-19 CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation
BUS: \BqE RuN. 10\
zuDE A VEHICLE WITIN THE COORDINATED SYSTEM. REQUEST A
COPY OF THE MANIFEST PAGE THAT CONTAINS THIS TRIP.
Date of Obsen ation tllt lzozo
Please list any special guests that were present:
ON-Slu OssrnvatloN oF THE Sysrrn
Dtutt-u r5 ULocation:
Number of Passengers picked up/dropped off:
Ambulatorv
Non-Ambulatory
Was the driver on time?{D No - How many minutes late/early?Yes
Did the driver provide any passenger assistance? {Yes I No
E(Y"r, E}'urifo.. fl Name Tag
B-lD Budg" E No
Did. the driver render an appropriate greeting?
d"., O No E Drir", regularly transports the rider, not necessary
If CTC has a policy on seat belts, did the driver ensure the passengers were properly belted?
dy"" O No
Was the vehicle neat and clean. and free from dirt, tom upholstery, damaged or broken seats,
protruding metal or other objects? El' Yes E No
Is there a sign posted on the interior ofthe vehicle with both a local phone number and the TD
Helpline for comments/complaints/commendations? El/ y"t tr No
Does the vehicle have working heat and air conditioning?{Yes I No
Does the vehicle have two-way communications in good working order? El/ Yes I No
Ifused, was the lift in good working order? 5{if,
I
I
Page 45
E Yes l No
Was the driver wearing any identification?
4.J.1
Packet Pg. 507 Attachment: FY 2018-19 CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation Coordinator)
Was there safe and appropriate seating lor all passengers?{NoYesE
Did the driver properly use the lift and secure the passenger? N/A tr yes E No
If No, please explain:
CTC:Counry,:
Date of Ride:
Number of Round Trips Number of Riders/Beneficiaries to Sun'ev
30%
201 - 1200 10o/o
1201 +
Funding Source No.
of Trips
No. of
Riders/Beneficiaries
No. of Calls
to Make
No. of
Calls Made
CTD
Medicaid
Other
Other
Other)
Other
Totals
Page 46
Note: Attach the manifest
0 200
4.J.1
Packet Pg. 508 Attachment: FY 2018-19 CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation Coordinator)
Vehicle: B37-Glaval
1845
Run: 101 [ 3:00AM - 4:45Plrtl
Stop Time Customer Name Stop Address Cont. # Request Time Validation lnformation
2:.12PM
Pick Up
Customer Pay:
$r.00
BRAVO
2668 Tamiami Trl E
Naples, FL 34112
2:00PM P Stop Time
Odometer
2:12P1\1
10'1735
Cancellation
No Show
Complete
Attendants: 0 Guests:0 Mobility: AN48 Assistance Need:
Comments: SUITE 310
Fare Type : Assorted Cash Paid Ahead Return Pay Tickets
Funding Source:ADA
2:52PM
Drop Off
448 Golden Gate Blvd W
Naples, FL 34117
901269 2:00PM P Stop Time
Odometer
2:52PM
1017 52
Attendants: 0 Guests: 0 Mobility: AMB
Comments: SUITE 310
Daily Pass Sold
Assistance Need:Funding Source:ADA
3:'1 1PM
Pick Up
Customer Pay:
$1.00
Goodwill
8915 Sage Ave Off lmmokalee Rd and Collier Blvd.
Naples, FL 34120
900052 3:10PM P Stop Time
Odometer
3:11P1/
101757
Cancellation
No Show
Complete
Attendants: O Guests:0 Mobility: AMB
Fare Type : Assorted Cash Paid Ahead
Daily Pass Sold
Assistance Need
Return Pay Tickets
Funding Source: TDC
3:32PM
Drop Off
3295 Twilight Ln APT 5301 GATECODE- #8993
Naples, FL 34109
9000s2 3:'10PM P Stop Time
Odometer
3:32PN4
101764
Attendants: 0 Guests:o fiIobility: AMB
Daily Pass Sold
Assistance Need Funding Source:TDC
0t Run By Vehicle Page 10 of 11 Driver Initial:,ffi,no.rt.tvt t.t.
Driver Name: Andy Ramtahal [ 3:00AM - 4:45PIr[] For: 1l31l2O2O
901269
4.J.1
Packet Pg. 509 Attachment: FY 2018-19 CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation
Ox-Srrr OnssnvarroN oF THE Sysrnlr
RIDE A VEHICLE WITIN TI{E COORDINATED SYSTEM. REQUEST A
COPY OF THE MANIFEST PAGE THAT CONTAINS THIS TRIP.
Date of Observation
Please list any special guests that were present:
a3
Location:a33Y UEENS
Number of Passengers picked up/dropped off:
Ambulatory
Non-Ambulatory
Was the driver on time? tr Yes E No - How many minutes late/early?
E rninrrtes lqte
Did the driver provide any passenger assistance? E Yes E No
Was the driver wearing any identification?EI Yes: El Unifo.m E Name Tag
E Io g"dg" E uo
Did the driver render an appropriate greeting?
[V". ENo E Driver regularly transports the rider, not necessary
If CTC has a policy on seat belts, did the driver ensure the passengers were properly belted?
EYesENo
Was the vehicle neat and clean, and free from dirt, tom upholstery, damaged or broken seats,
protruding metal or other objecrs? E Yes tr No
Is there a sign posted on the interior of the vehicle with both a local phone number and the TD
Helpline for comments/complaints/commendations? E yes tr No
Does the vehicle have working heat and air conditioning?
Does the vehicle have two-way communications in good working order?Yes
tr
E
E
Yes D No
No
Ifused, was the lift in good working order? frlI
I
I
Page 45
A Yes O No
I
4.J.1
Packet Pg. 510 Attachment: FY 2018-19 CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation Coordinator)
Was there safe and appropriate seating for all passengers?BYestrNo
Did the driver properly use the lift and secure the passenger? \/[o Yes
If No, please explain:
CTC:County:
Date of Ride:
Number of Round Tri ps Number of Riders/Beneficiaries to Survey
0-200 30o/o
20t - 1200 't0%
l20l +5%
No
Funding Source No.
of Trips
No. of
Riders/Beneficiaries
No. of Calls
to Make
No. of
Calls Made
CTD
Medicaid
Other
Other
Other)
Other
Totals
Page 46
Note: Attach the manifest
I
4.J.1
Packet Pg. 511 Attachment: FY 2018-19 CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation Coordinator)
Vehicle: 830-Glaval
1117
Run: 101 [ 4:35AM - 4:06P I Driver Name: Andy Ramtahal [ 4:35AM - 4:06Pi,tl For: 112312020
Stop Time Customer Name Stop Address Conf. # Request Time Validation lnformation
9:32AM
Daily Pass Sold
4559 Boabadilla St
Naples, FL 34103
B9BB95 10:00AM D Stop Time
Odometer
9:32AM
222897
Cancellation
No Show
Complete
Funding Source: ADA
9:47AM
Drop Off
Attendants: 0 Guests: 0 Mobility: AMB
Daily Pass Sold
Pavillion Plaza
833 Vanderbilt Beach Rd THEATERy MOVIES
Naples, FL 34108
Assistance Need:
898895 9:47ANI
222901
10:17AM
Pick Up
Customer Pay:
$1.00
Attendants: 0 Guests: 0 lvlobility: AN,IB
Fare Type: Assorted Cash Paid Ahead
Daily Pass Sold
2334 Queens Way
Naples, FL 34112
859606 l0:30AM D Stop Time
Odometer
10:17AM
222913
Cancellation
No Show
Complete
Assistance Need
Return Pay Tickets
Funding Source: TDC
10.35Alvl
Drop Off
Attendantsi 0 Guests: 0 Mobility: AN48
Daily Pass Sold
ARBY'S RESTAURANT
2436 Pine Ridge Rd 43+2264
Naples, FL 34109
859606 10:35AM
222921
Assistance Need:Funding Source: TDC
Run By Vehicle Page 6 cf 8 Driver Initial $ o.,,.n13,yg
Pick Up
Customer Pay:
, _$1.90
Attendants: 0 Guesls: 0 Nlobility: AMB Assistance Need:
Fare Type : Assorted Cash Paid Ahead Return Pay Tickets
10:00AM D Stop Time
Odometer
Funding Source: ADA
10:30AM D Stop Time
Odometer
4.J.1
Packet Pg. 512 Attachment: FY 2018-19 CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation
BU5:l8q5 RUN:\ol
RIDE A VEHICLE MTIN THE COORDINATED SYSTEM. REQUEST A
COPY OF T}IE MAMFEST PAGE TT{AT CONTAINS THIS TRIP.
Date of Observation ?ozo
Please list any special guests that were present
Ox-Srru Orsnnvl.rroN oF THE Sysrpu
Location:tlome D RESI DEN CL,11O Crodtette fi
Number of Passengers picked up/dropped off
Ambulatory
Non-Ambulatory
Was the driver on time? Ul Yes No - How many minutes late/early?
Did the driver provide any passenger assistance? (Yes E No
Was the driver wearing any identification?{ Y"", E/unifor- O Name Tag
E}fo audg" E No
Did the driver render an appropriate greeting?
&", ENo E Driver regularly transports the rider, not necessary
If CTC has a policy on seat belts, did the driver ensure the passengers were properly belted?
EyesE No
Was the vehicle neat and clean, and free from dirt, torn upholstery, damaged or broken seats,
protruding metal or other objects? E Yes tr No
Is there a sign posted on the interior ofthe vehicle with both a local phone number and the TD
Helpline for comments/complaints/commendations? E Yes E No
Does the vehicle have working heat and air conditioning?E yes No
Does the vehicle have two-way communications in good working order? E Yes tr No
lf used, was the lift in good working order?
E
I
I
Page 45
El Yes No
I
I
4.J.1
Packet Pg. 513 Attachment: FY 2018-19 CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation Coordinator)
Was there safe and appropriate seating for all passengers?
Did the driver properly use the lift and secure the passenger?
If No. please explain:
{r* E No
{""" n No
CTC Countv:
Date of Ride:
Number of Round Trips \umber of Riders/Beneficiaries to Suney
0-200 30o/o
201 r200 l0o/o
l20l +5Yo
Funding Source No.
of Trips
No. of
Riders/Beneficiaries
No. of Calls
to Make
No. of
Calls Made
CTD
Medicaid
Other
Other
Other)
Other
Totals
Page 46
Note: Attach the manifest
4.J.1
Packet Pg. 514 Attachment: FY 2018-19 CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation Coordinator)
Vehicle: B37-Glaval
1845
Run: 101 [ 3:00A1, - 4]45PHl Ddver Nam6: Andy Ramtahal [ 3:00Am - 4:45P I Fori 11311'IZO2O
Stop Tlme Customer Namo Stop Addr€sr Gonl. # Requeet Tlme Valld8tlon lnformation
12',tsPM
Break Slart
COLLIER AREA PARA TRANSIT
8300 Radio Rd
Naples, FL 34104
Stop Time
Odometer
Daily Pass Sold
'12:45PM
Break End
COLLIER AREA PARA TRANSIT
8300 Radio Rd
Naples. FL 34104
Stop Time
Odometer
Daily Pass Sold
1:40PM
Pick Up
Customer Pay;
$3.00
HOMEWOOD RESIDENCE
770 Goodletle Rd N
Naples, FL 34102
901644 l:00PM P Stop Time
Odometer
1:4OPM
101729
Cancellation !
No Show
Complele
Attendants: 0 Guests: 0 Mobility: WHEELCHAIR Assistance Need
Fare Type : Assorted Cash Paid Ahead Retum Pay Tlckets
Daily Pass Sold
Funding Source: ADA
2:01PM
Drop Off
1007 Roseate Dr
Naples, FL 34104
901644 1:00PM P Stop Time
Odometer
2:O1PM
10'1733
Attendants: 0 Guests: 0 Mobility; WHEELCHAIR Assistance Need:
Daily Pass Sold
Funding Source:ADA
.i. ,l: il
1_
Run By Vehicle Page 9 of 11 Driver Initial:ffi^',r.rg;*.
4.J.1
Packet Pg. 515 Attachment: FY 2018-19 CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation
Rider/Beneficiary Survey
Number of trips 01/24/2020: 396
Number of rider/beneficiary surveys obtained: 40
Funding
ADA: 30 TDC: 10
1. Where you charged an amount in addition to the co-payment?
No: 40
Note: 3 respondents did indicate they had to make driver check again when
they were being charged more than their co-payment should be.
2. How often do you normally obtain transportation?
1-2 Times/Week: 7 3-5 Times/Week: 30 Daily 7 Days/Week: 3
Other: 1 Don’t use anymore
3.Have you ever been denied transportation?
Yes: 4 (1-2 Times, Space not available) No: 36
4. What do you normally use the service for?
Type of use Number of respondent’s answers
Medical 14
Employment 5
Nutritional 5
Education/Training/Day Care 10
Life-Sustaining/Other 8
4.J.1
Packet Pg. 516 Attachment: FY 2018-19 CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation Coordinator)
5. Did you have a problem with your trip
No: 10
Yes: 30 comments summarized below comments that were similar in nature were
united and some respondents had multiple problems with the trip.
11 Late pick-up (60 Minutes, new driver, gets person into a panic when have not
been picked up and know will be late to appointment).
12 Late return pick-up 1 hour or more (One respondent indicated it had been 2
hours wait sometimes but has gotten better recently).
6 Pick-up times not convenient, late specifically with newer drivers too early or too
late.
1 Driver went to wrong place to pick me up.
1 Getting call returned after leaving several messages.
1 I did miss medical appointment once.
1 Trip scheduled in error.
1 Late to an appointment/Failed to be picked-up.
1 Reservation had time incorrect.
1 A driver who was mad that he had to help my husband with his seat b elt again.
Provided complaint to operator. I imagine this was resolved has not happened
again.
1 Rude reservationist.
4.J.1
Packet Pg. 517 Attachment: FY 2018-19 CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation Coordinator)
6. On a scale of 1 to 10 (10 bring most satisfied) rate the transportation you
have been receiving.
Average of all 40 respondents: Rating of 8.5
Table below shows the number of respondents that chose each specific rating
number used to calculate the average rating of 8.5.
Rating Number of
respondents chose
specific rating
1 1
4 2
5 1
6 3
7 1
8 9
8.5 3
9 3
9.5 2
10 10
7. What does transportation mean to you?
-Enables daughter to get where she needs to go when I can't drive her.
-Independence. Satisfies all needs.
-Very Important.
-Means a lot. Can't drive if I didn't have this service I would not do anything
or be able to go anywhere I need to go. Glad to have it.
-Very Important can't drive would not be able to go anywhere without it.
-Everything. With so many people I have to take care of this allows my son
to go to school.
-Means so much to have independence when my household only has one car.
4.J.1
Packet Pg. 518 Attachment: FY 2018-19 CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation Coordinator)
-Could not get around without it. Can't drive so would have no oth er way to
get to doctor’s appointment without it.
-My life can't get around without it. My lifeline.
-Everything. I have no idea where I would get anywhere without it. Could not
live without it. Hope it can continue forever.
-Only way to go to doctor. Glad to have it. Improves quality of life.
-Lifeline. No other way to get around.
-Grateful to have it.
-Whether or not I can get out of my community beyond the weekend when
my daughter can take me. Freedom, independence, and saves me money
having a fixed income and improves quality of financials.
-A battle to go to treatment if I did not have this service.
-Great help freeing up family members.
-Independence. Could not get to store or afford to pay any other form of
transportation. Depend on it 100% and have no other back up.
-Great help. Benefits to move around county.
-Provides independence to my daughter.
-Very valuable with very polite drivers that are skilled and ready to help.
-Disabled driver licensed gats me from point A to point B.
-Love the paratransit bus after my accident.
-Allows me to go out and have a better quality of life. I cannot take the city
bus.
-Guaranteed mobility.
-Means a lot. Am in no condition to drive after medical appointment. Takes a
lot out of me.
-Tremendous help. A way to get around without my wife having to change
her schedule.
4.J.1
Packet Pg. 519 Attachment: FY 2018-19 CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation Coordinator)
-Life can't move anywhere without it.
-Very important can't stand at the bus stop due to my condition or stand under
full sun.
-So helpful for people after dialysis.
-Great help.
-Independence.
-Quality of life.
-Use for getting to work and back.
-Enjoy getting home in a timely manner.
-I would not be able to drive my husband to get the care he requires for his
Alzheimer’s.
-Means a lot couldn't get around without it. Best thing to happen to Naples.
-Can go where I need to go for a reasonable price.
Additional Comments:
-All great drivers
-Receptionists are doing a wonderful job.
-Have been late for school twice
-Have experienced reservation errors once and a while. Have had to wait
more than 2 hours for a pickup and sometimes informed that buses will only
be going to my area after 6:00 PM.
-I work so this is very helpful. They are respectful with my son and his
condition and when he forgets and when he gets down.
-Reservation error has occurred
-For return pick up the bus had not come called and was told that the bus was
on the way should be there in about 10 minutes. Seems like the person did
not actually check because after waiting some more called and was informed
4.J.1
Packet Pg. 520 Attachment: FY 2018-19 CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation Coordinator)
the driver did not have me in their route scheduled. So, had to wait some
more for a bus to pick me up. Better communication between person on
phone and driver needed.
-Get a call when they are falling behind
-Like to be called when bus will be late
-Great if there is a way to go through email or app to be able to schedule,
cancel or see schedule to confirm to reduce phone calls.
-Improve system call and information on pickup window. Think they are late
but then they say they are within their pickup window.
-No notice of early pick up is given has happened twice already and am told
if I am not ready at that time then I will not be able to go at all.
-My trust has gone down on the service. Lately have not been getting me to
where I need to go on time. Not being able to get to a place on time was
making me feel worse so lately I have been relying on having to pay Uber or
neighbors for certain time sensitive trips. In the past had newer drivers
asking me where we are going when I am not really able to guide them,
waited forever so I am glad they started using GPS more, as newer drivers
that get lost take up more time each trip. Last month had a class that was
over by the time I got there.
-Sometimes late picking up.
-Information on how to give drivers permission to assist riders in situations
where more than a step up is involved should be provided as part of the
application or interview process.
-Very polite, nice and sweet drivers. Great and try to do the best they can
-Frustration from side pick-ups where a person does not cancel ahead of time
and it delays the trip to get to the destination. Not fair to does who are
responsible and cancel their trips within the given period of time.
4.J.1
Packet Pg. 521 Attachment: FY 2018-19 CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation Coordinator)
-Do have some issues with waiting long 2-3 hours and no one answers or
obtain a notification of how long I will be waiting.
-Pick up times can be better.
-Bus drivers great. Very gentle take my bag up and down to my door. I really
appreciate their help.
-One of the drivers goes fast in my condominium. The speed limit is 15 mph
and there are speed bumps but still goes faster than should.
-It would be of great help if transport chairs would be allowed on the bus
would be easier for my wife once I get off the bus are smaller and not as
heavy to carry.
-Excellent drivers very courteous
-Love all the drivers.
-When I call no one answers and have no idea if they even listen to my
message.
-Communication with drivers and dispatchers needs to be better
-Am picked up at 5:30 AM for a 7:00 AM scheduled pick up.
-Better communication calls me to tell me they are here. Driver came to pick
me up and didn't ask my name and then left. Pickup late sometimes and one
time I called after 1 o'clock asking about my bus I was told they were
looking for a bus for me. Waited for hours and didn't have a way home.
Don't use it for anything else because never know when they are going to
come so have someone take me.
-Very polite drivers.
-Runs late once and a while. Sometimes they pick us up as a group and then
sometimes one by one might be more efficient to pick us up all at the same
time.
4.J.1
Packet Pg. 522 Attachment: FY 2018-19 CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation Coordinator)
-Stopped using the service would make me too nervous that I would never
make it to my medical appointments on time and this would make my pain
even worse. On one trip I got picked up the 5 minutes after my meeting was
supposed to start even when booking an hour prior to the meeting. Poor
scheduling and the scheduling agent was rude to me. Spoke with
management to see if things would improve but never did. When I called the
number, I could never get anyone on the phone felt like they were avoiding
my calls. Buses said they would come but never did.
4.J.1
Packet Pg. 523 Attachment: FY 2018-19 CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation Coordinator)
Page 52
Level of Cost
Worksheet 1
Insert Cost page from the AOR.
4.J.1
Packet Pg. 524 Attachment: FY 2018-19 CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation Coordinator)
09/10/2019 01:49 PM Page 25 of 25
County: Collier Demographics Number
CTC: Collier County Board of County Commissioners
Contact: Michelle E. Arnold Total County Population 372,880
3299 TAMIAMI TRAIL E #103
NAPLES, FL 34112 Unduplicated Head Count 4,139
239-252-5841
Email: michellearnold@colliergov.net Trips By Type of Service 2017 2018 2019 Vehicle Data 2017 2018 2019
Fixed Route (FR) 0 0 0 Vehicle Miles 1,351,040 1,407,704 2,224,740
Deviated FR 0 0 0 Roadcalls 17 20 116
Complementary ADA 0 0 77,945 Accidents 11 9 23
Paratransit 114,744 109,623 39,640 Vehicles 29 29 70
TNC 0 0 0 Drivers 44 66 67
Taxi 0 0 0 School Board (School Bus) 0 0 0 Volunteers 0 0 0 TOTAL TRIPS 114,744 109,623 117,585 Passenger Trips By Trip Purpose Financial and General Data
Medical 51,839 50,069 43,133 Expenses $4,614,372 $5,433,226 $5,818,222
Employment 13,043 12,874 14,256 Revenues $4,828,842 $4,931,076 $5,211,529
Ed/Train/DayCare 3,445 4,097 16,982 Commendations 1 6 2
Nutritional 13,700 13,868 14,907 Complaints 27 65 43
Life-Sustaining/Other 32,717 28,715 28,307 Passenger No-Shows 499 2,821 4,135
TOTAL TRIPS 114,744 109,623 117,585 Unmet Trip Requests 23 199 16 Passenger Trips By Revenue Source Performance Measures
CTD 24,408 18,917 27,232 Accidents per 100,000 Miles 0.81 0.64 1.03
AHCA 0 0 3,626 Miles between Roadcalls 79,473 70,385 19,179
APD 0 0 0 Avg. Trips per Passenger 97.74 83.30 28.41
DOEA 332 319 96 Cost per Trip $40.21 $49.56 $49.48
DOE 0 0 0 Cost per Paratransit Trip $40.21 $49.56 $49.48
Other 90,004 90,387 86,631 Cost per Total Mile $3.42 $3.86 $2.62
TOTAL TRIPS 114,744 109,623 117,585 Cost per Paratransit Mile $3.42 $3.86 $2.62 Trips by Provider Type
CTC 0 0 0 Transportation Operator 102,424 103,178 105,273 Coordination Contractor 12,320 6,445 12,312 TOTAL TRIPS 114,744 109,623 117,585
4.J.1
Packet Pg. 525 Attachment: FY 2018-19 CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation
Page 53
Level of Competition
Worksheet 2
1. Inventory of Transportation Operators in the Service Area
Column A
Operators
Available
Column B
Operators
Contracted in the
System.
Column C
Include Trips
Column D
% of all Trips
Private Non-Profit
Private For-Profit
Government
Public Transit
Agency
Total
2. How many of the operators are coordination contractors?
3. Of the operators included in the local coordinated system, how many have the capability
of expanding capacity?
Does the CTC have the ability to expand?
4. Indicate the date the latest transportation operator was brought into the system.
5. Does the CTC have a competitive procurement process?
6. In the past five (5) years, how many times have the following methods been used in
selection of the transportation operators?
Low bid Requests for proposals
Requests for qualifications Requests for interested parties
Negotiation only
Which of the methods listed on the previous page was used to select the current
operators?
4.J.1
Packet Pg. 526 Attachment: FY 2018-19 CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation Coordinator)
Page 54
7. Which of the following items are incorporated in the review and selection of
transportation operators for inclusion in the coordinated system?
Capabilities of operator Scope of Work
Age of company Safety Program
Previous experience Capacity
Management Training Program
Qualifications of staff Insurance
Resources Accident History
Economies of Scale Quality
Contract Monitoring Community Knowledge
Reporting Capabilities Cost of the Contracting Process
Financial Strength Price
Performance Bond Distribution of Costs
Responsiveness to Solicitation Other: (list)
8. If a competitive bid or request for proposals has been used to select the transportation
operators, to how many potential operators was the request distributed in the most
recently completed process?
How many responded?
The request for bids/proposals was distributed:
Locally Statewide Nationally
9. Has the CTC reviewed the possibilities of competitively contracting any services other
than transportation provision (such as fuel, maintenance, etc…)?
4.J.1
Packet Pg. 527 Attachment: FY 2018-19 CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation Coordinator)
Page 55
Level of Availability (Coordination)
Worksheet 3
Planning – What are the coordinated plans for transporting the TD population?
Public Information – How is public information distributed about transportation services in
the community?
Certification – How are individual certifications and registrations coordinated for local TD
transportation services?
Eligibility Records – What system is used to coordinate which individuals are eligible for
special transportation services in the community?
4.J.1
Packet Pg. 528 Attachment: FY 2018-19 CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation Coordinator)
Page 56
Reservations – What is the reservation process? How is the duplication of a reservation
prevented?
Trip Allocation – How is the allocation of trip requests to providers coordinated?
Scheduling – How is the trip assignment to vehicles coordinated?
Call Intake – To what extent is transportation coordinated to ensure that a user can reach a
Reservationist on the first call?
4.J.1
Packet Pg. 529 Attachment: FY 2018-19 CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation Coordinator)
Page 57
Dispatching – How is the real time communication and direction of drivers coordinated?
General Service Monitoring – How is the overseeing of transportation operators
coordinated?
Daily Service Monitoring – How are real-time resolutions to trip problems coordinated?
Transport – How are the actual transportation services and modes of transportation
coordinated?
4.J.1
Packet Pg. 530 Attachment: FY 2018-19 CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation Coordinator)
Page 58
Trip Reconciliation – How is the confirmation of official trips coordinated?
Billing – How is the process for requesting and processing fares, payments, and reimbursements
coordinated?
Reporting – How is operating information reported, compiled, and examined?
Cost Resources – How are costs shared between the coordinator and the operators (s) in order
to reduce the overall costs of the coordinated program?
4.J.1
Packet Pg. 531 Attachment: FY 2018-19 CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation Coordinator)
Page 59
Information Resources – How is information shared with other organizations to ensure
smooth service provision and increased service provision?
Overall – What type of formal agreement does the CTC have with organizations, which provide
transportation in the community?
4.J.1
Packet Pg. 532 Attachment: FY 2018-19 CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation Coordinator)
Memorandum
To: Brandy Otero, Collier MPO Principal Planner
Josephine Medina, MPO Senior Planner
From: Omar Deleon, Transit Manager
Date: March 17, 2020
Subject: Response to 2020 CTC Evaluation
The Public Transit & Neighborhood Enhancement (PTNE) Division is in receipt of the CTC Evaluation
Workbook for the review period of July 1, 2018 through June 30, 2019. We have reviewed the report and
corresponding commends and recommendations and have the following response for your consideration.
Review the CTC contracts for compliance with 427.0155(1), F.S. - “Execute uniform contracts for service
using a standard contract, which includes performance standards for operators.”
Comments:
The CTC is in compliance with this section.
Review the CTC last AOR submittal for compliance with 427. 0155(2) - “Collect Annual Operating Data
for submittal to the Commission.”
Comments:
The CTC is in compliance with this section. The CTC submits all reports and agreements on time. No
recommendation for improvements is needed in this area.
Review the CTC monitoring of its transportation operator contracts to ensure compliance with
427.0155(3), F.S. - “Review all transportation operator contracts annually.”
Comments:
The CTC is in compliance with this section.
Review the TDSP to determine the utilization of school buses and public transportation services
[Chapter 427.0155(4)] - “Approve and coordinate the utilization of school bus and public transportation
services in accordance with the TDSP.”
Comments:
School buses are not utilized in the coordinated system.
Rule 41-2.012(5)(b): "As part of the Coordinator’s performance, the local Coordinating Board shall also
set an annual percentage goal increase for the number of trips provided within the system for ridership
on public transit, where applicable. In areas where the public transit is not being utilized, the local
Coordinating Board shall set an annual percentage of the number of trips to be provided on public
transit."
4.J.2
Packet Pg. 533 Attachment: PTNE Division’s response to the CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation Coordinator)
Comments:
Although Goal 2 of the TDSP is to "Maximize effective transfer of individuals from paratransit to fixed
route services." This does not provide a specific annual percentage increase to be obtained. This item
should be addressed during the next major TDSP update to ensure compliance.
Findings:
There are no compliance issues found with Chapter 427.
Recommendations:
A mobility manager conducts eligibility reviews to determine if the fixed route system can be utilized. The
CTC is encouraged to continue the transfer of individuals to the fixed route system whenever possible to
minimize paratransit costs. The TDSP should be revised during the next major update to include a specific
annual percentage goal to transfer passengers from paratransit to transit.
CTC Response:
The transportation disadvantaged individuals that are utilizing paratransit that might be able to use Fixed
Route are doing so because Fixed Route is not available in the area of their origin or destination. Although
the CTC agrees that all effort should be made to transfer individuals to the fixed route system to minimize
costs, setting an annual percentage goal may not be achievable without the expansion of fixed route
service into other areas of the County.
The CTC will work with the LCB to determine a reasonable performance measure that is consistent with
Rule 41-2.012(5)(b) which is intended to increase the usage of public transit not necessarily transferring
trips from paratransit to fixed route.
Compliance with 41-2.006(1), Minimum Insurance Compliance - “...ensure compliance with the
minimum liability insurance requirement of $100,000 per person and $200,000 per incident…”
Comments:
The CTC maintains compliance with the minimum liability insurance requirements as directed by, F.A.C
41-2.006.
Compliance with 41-2.011(2), Evaluating Cost-Effectiveness of Coordination Contractors and
Transportation Alternatives. - “...contracts shall be reviewed annually by the Community
Transportation Coordinator and the Coordinating Board as to the effectiveness and efficiency of the
Transportation Operator or the renewal of any Coordination Contracts.”
Findings:
The CTC is in compliance with this rule.
Recommendations:
None noted
4.J.2
Packet Pg. 534 Attachment: PTNE Division’s response to the CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation Coordinator)
Compliance with Commission Standards - “...shall adhere to Commission approved standards…”
TDSP Commission Standards
Commission Standards Comments Response
Local toll-free phone number
must be posted in all
vehicles.
The TDSP addresses this standard.
All vehicles inspected as part of
this evaluation were found in
compliance. It is however
suggested that the number should
be posted in larger font for greater
visibility to the service users.
No response required
Vehicle Cleanliness The TDSP addresses this standard.
All vehicles as part of this
evaluation inspected were clean
and free of damaged or broken
seats.
No response required
Passenger/Trip Database The TDSP addresses this standard.
The CTC management entity will
collect and store in a database the
name, phone number, address,
funding source, eligibility, and
special requirements of each
passenger.
No response required
Adequate seating The TDSP addresses this standard.
Vehicle seating will not exceed the
manufacturer’s recommended
capacity. All vehicles as part of this
evaluation maintained adequate
seating.
No response required
Driver Identification The TDSP addresses this standard.
All observed during this evaluation
had uniforms on, announced
themselves and greeted the
passengers at their door.
Although the TDSP states that all
drivers are to have a name badge
displayed at all times, it was noted
that during one of the evaluations
there was a driver that did not
have their identification badge
visible.
No response required
Passenger Assistance The TDSP addresses this standard.
All drivers observed during this
evaluation provided assistance as
needed.
No response required
4.J.2
Packet Pg. 535 Attachment: PTNE Division’s response to the CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation Coordinator)
Smoking, Eating and Drinking The TDSP addresses this standard.
There will be no smoking on any
vehicles in the coordinated
system. Eating and drinking on
board the vehicle is prohibited.
Exceptions are permitted when
required due to an existing
medical condition.
No response required
Two-way Communications The TDSP addresses this standard.
All vehicles observed as part of this
evaluation were equipped with
two-way communication in good
working order.
No response required
Air Conditioning/Heating The TDSP addresses this standard.
Air conditioning was working in all
vehicles observed. Due to the
temperature, the heat was not
tested.
No response required
Billing Requirements The TDSP requires that all
payments to transportation
subcontractors will be made in a
timely manner pursuant to Florida
Statutes. All bills shall be paid
within 7 working days to
subcontractors, after receipt of
said payment by the Community
Transportation Coordinator, in
accordance with Section 287.0585,
F.S.
CAT currently does not have a
subcontractor providing service
for CAT Connect.
Findings:
The TDSP complies with all Commission standards.
Recommendations:
The CTC is encouraged to post the local toll-free number in all vehicles in larger font for greater visibility
to the service users.
The CTC is encouraged to review and ensure that drivers have ID badges displayed at all times.
CTC Response:
A standard font size of 72 has been established for the posting of the toll-free number in all vehicles. Signs
have been obtained for those vehicles with signs that did not meet that standard and they have been
replaced.
The Vendor contract requires all drivers to be in full uniform when providing transportation service, which
includes displaying his/her ID. We will require the General Manager and Training Manager to review the
policy with all drivers at their safety meeting and require proof of driver attendance. CAT will conduct
4.J.2
Packet Pg. 536 Attachment: PTNE Division’s response to the CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation Coordinator)
period inspections to ensure vendor is adhering to this policy. The vendor will be assessed Liquidated
Damages each time a driver is found to be out of uniform.
Compliance with Local Standards - “...shall adhere to Commission approved standards...”
TDSP Local Standards
Local Standards Comments Response
Transport of Escorts and
dependent children policy
The TDSP addresses this standard.
Personal care attendants must be
approved on initial customer
application with medical
documentation for reason
attendant is needed. If an escort/
personal care attendant is
requested, they will be transported
at no additional charge.
The CAT Connect Rider’s Guide
reinforces this standard.
Use, Responsibility, and cost
of child restraint devices
The TDSP addresses this standard.
Restraints are required for children
under 5 and/or under 50 lbs.
The CAT Connect Rider’s Guide
reinforces this standard.
Out-of-Service Area trips The CTC does not provide any trips
outside of Collier County.
No response required
CPR/1st Aid The TDSP addresses this standard.
Drivers are certified in CPR every
two years (biennial).
The Vendor Contract reinforces
this standard.
Driver Criminal Background
Screening
The TDSP addresses this standard.
All drivers in the coordinated
system must have a “favorable”
background check from the Florida
Department of Law Enforcement
(“favorable” as defined by the
Department of Children and
Families policies and procedures).
The Vendor Contract reinforces
this standard.
Rider Personal Property The TDSP addresses this standard.
Passengers are allowed to bring up
to four shopping bags that fit under
the passenger’s seat and/or on
their lap.
The CAT Connect Rider’s Guide
reinforces this standard.
Advance reservation
requirements
The TDSP addresses this standard.
Reservations are taken a day in
advance up to 5 p.m. the business
day prior to the trip request.
Passengers with an urgent need to
travel should call the CTC. Unless
other regulations are applicable,
same day trip requests cannot be
The CAT Connect Rider’s Guide
reinforces this standard.
4.J.2
Packet Pg. 537 Attachment: PTNE Division’s response to the CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation Coordinator)
guaranteed. However, the CTC will
attempt to accommodate the
request.
Pick-up Window TDSP addresses this standard. For
the focus of this evaluation the 30
minutes early to zero minute late
medical and employment policy
was reviewed for trips. Effective
12-04-2019 the LCB approved a
negotiated methodology for trips
based on a mileage-based
scheduling. The TDSP will be
amended to include the updated
window policy.
The CAT Connect Rider’s Guide
reinforces this standard.
Findings:
As mentioned above, the scheduling methodology of assigning trips changed from zoned based trip
assignments with 1-hour and 2-hour windows to negotiated mileage-based trip assignments.
A complete review of manifests for the day of 01/24/2020 was completed as part of this evaluation. Due
to recent changes to how trips are assigned only the pick-up window standard that states that medical
appointments and employment must follow the "30 minute early to zero minute late" policy was used to
evaluate. Based on this standard on time performance for all the trips this day was calculated to be 92%,
the on time performance for trips categorized as work and medical drop off trips that day was calculated
to be 61%, the on time performance for trips categorizes only as medical drop off trips that day was
calculated to be 57%, and the on time performance for trips categorized as employment that day was
calculated to be 76%. The manifest identified one patient as being dropped off 44 minutes after their
requested drop off time and another two patients being dropped off 72 minutes early from their
requested drop off time.
Recommendations:
The on-time performance for medical and employment continues to be an issue. During the annual public
workshop meeting the STARability Foundation indicated various of its participants at various locations are
being picked up or dropped off late sometimes by hours at a time and requested a better method of
communicating with families when buses will be late. Comments from rider surveys also mention late
drop off and pick up times for medical and employment as being issues. Three respondents indicated a
heightened level of stress of not knowing whether they would get to their destinations on time. One of
these three respondents is no longer using the service for this reason and another respondent indicated
that they are paying Uber or a friend to get them to their destination and only using the service for trips
that are not time sensitive. Other comments included that they are not being notified of tardiness, and
vehicle issues or being notified hours after an issue has occurred which does not allow them to find an
alternative way home. Comments also indicated they are having issues with the incorrect scheduling of
their trips.
The CTC is encouraged to provide in their quarterly report to the LCB the on-time performance for medical
and employment trips individually not just as part of the overall on time performance for all trips. It is also
4.J.2
Packet Pg. 538 Attachment: PTNE Division’s response to the CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation Coordinator)
encouraged that they provide a quarterly report to the LCB on measures that are being done to help
address these issues with on time performance.
The CTC is encouraged to devise a system to inform passengers of when their driver would be arriving and
to confirm scheduling information for their trips. The CTC is encouraged to pursue the phone system to
enhance customer service.
In the next TDSP update service standard changes due to new trip assignment methodology should be
reflected in Pick-Up Window and return trip scheduling.
CTC Response:
CAT made contact with the individuals that attended the Annual Public Workshop in an effort to schedule
an appointment to discuss the issues raised. However, do to the COVID-19 Pandemic the meeting was
not scheduled. Attempts to schedule a meeting will be done when business is back to normal.
The PTNE Division is evaluating the acquisition of a system to remind passengers of their trips as well as
alert them when the driver has arrived. An improved phone system is also being explored.
Summary Remarks
The PTNE Division appreciates the feedback provided and will make every effort to comply with the
recommendations in the future.
4.J.2
Packet Pg. 539 Attachment: PTNE Division’s response to the CTC Evaluation (12575 : Ratification of the Community Transportation Coordinator)
06/12/2020
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Citizens Advisory Committee Chair Report
OBJECTIVE: For the MPO Board to receive a report from the Chair of the Citizens Advisory
Committee (CAC) related to recent committee actions and recommendations.
CONSIDERATIONS: Staff prepared the attached written report. The CAC Chair will provide a verbal
report providing additional information regarding recent committee activities.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Committee recommendations are reported in the Executive
Summary for each action item, and may be elaborated upon by the Chair in his/her report to the Board.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable
Prepared by: Anne McLaughlin, MPO Director
ATTACHMENT(S)
1. CAC Chair Report (DOCX)
7.A.1
Packet Pg. 540
06/12/2020
COLLIER COUNTY
Metropolitan Planning Organization
Item Number: 7.A.1
Doc ID: 12572
Item Summary: Citizens Advisory Committee Chair Report
Meeting Date: 06/12/2020
Prepared by:
Title: – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Karen Intriago
06/04/2020 7:44 AM
Submitted by:
Title: Executive Director - MPO – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Anne McLaughlin
06/04/2020 7:44 AM
Approved By:
Review:
Metropolitan Planning Organization Brandy Otero MPO Analyst Review Completed 06/04/2020 8:52 AM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin MPO Executive Director Review Completed 06/04/2020 9:09 AM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin Meeting Pending 06/12/2020 9:00 AM
7.A.1
Packet Pg. 541
CAC Committee Chair Report
The Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC) met using ZOOM as a virtual meeting platform on May 18, 2020
and a quorum was achieved.
Agency Reports
FDOT – Ms. Peters – FDOT is going through draft Priority Projects and has been coordinating with local
agencies to address questions while vetting projects during the constructability review. Upcoming Work
Program cycle FY23-26. Reported that the gas tax has been impacted by the pandemic. Another revenue
estimating conference is likely to be scheduled. FDOT is reviewing work program to be prepared, primarily
for FDOT projects, but also local priority projects, to see if any can be deferred. Also, public meetings
scheduled on I-75 Managed Lane Study were postponed during the quarantine. FDOT is looking at
scheduling them again. In the meantime, study information is posted on: www.FWSLinterchange.com
Committee Actions
• Reviewed and endorsed 2020 Project Priorities; regarding City of Naples proposed improvements
to Tamiami Trail/Golden Gate Parkway intersection - two committee members expressed concern
with difficulty exiting shopping center on west side of US41 to head north; Ms. Peters will notify
design team of concern
• Endorsed the FY2021-2025 TIP
• Endorsed the Public Participation Plan Amendment
• Received a briefing and provided input on the 2045 LRTP roadway network scenario planning;
committee member requested file on socio-economic data.
• Endorsed Collier County National Highway System (NHS) Justification Report and SR 82 NHS
Justification Report.
Reports and Presentations
• FDOT presented on SIS 2045 Cost Feasible Plan
Distribution Items
• n/a
Committee members expressed preference for virtual meetings whenever possible. Staff noted temporary
suspension of Sunshine Law requirement for in-person meetings set to expire in July if not extended.
The next 3 meetings are anticipated to be held as virtual meetings and are in addition to the regular meeting
calendar to assist the MPO in formulating roadway network alternatives for the 2045 LRTP and reviewing
FDOT’s planning model outputs. They are scheduled for June 10, July 8 and August 7, 2020 at 2:00 p.m.
7.A.1.a
Packet Pg. 542 Attachment: CAC Chair Report (12572 : Citizens Advisory Committee Chair Report)
06/12/2020
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Technical Advisory Committee Chair Report
OBJECTIVE: For the MPO Board to receive a report from the Chair of the Technical Advisory
Committee related to recent committee actions and recommendations.
CONSIDERATIONS: Staff prepared the attached written report. Staff typically provides a verbal report
at the MPO Board meeting, although the Chair is welcome to do so.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Committee recommendations are reported in the Executive
Summary for each action item, and may be elaborated upon by the Chair in his/her report to the Board.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable
Prepared by: Anne McLaughlin, MPO Director
ATTACHMENT(S)
1. TAC Chair Report (DOCX)
7.B.1
Packet Pg. 543
06/12/2020
COLLIER COUNTY
Metropolitan Planning Organization
Item Number: 7.B.1
Doc ID: 12573
Item Summary: Technical Advisory Committee Chair Report
Meeting Date: 06/12/2020
Prepared by:
Title: – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Karen Intriago
06/04/2020 7:47 AM
Submitted by:
Title: Executive Director - MPO – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Anne McLaughlin
06/04/2020 7:47 AM
Approved By:
Review:
Metropolitan Planning Organization Brandy Otero MPO Analyst Review Completed 06/04/2020 8:57 AM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin MPO Executive Director Review Completed 06/04/2020 9:06 AM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin Meeting Pending 06/12/2020 9:00 AM
7.B.1
Packet Pg. 544
TAC Committee Chair Report
The Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) met using ZOOM as a virtual meeting platform on May18,2020
and achieved a quorum.
Agency Reports
FDOT – Ms. Peters – FDOT is going through draft Priority Projects and has been coordinating with local
agencies to address questions while vetting projects during the constructability review. Upcoming Work
Program cycle FY23-26. Reported that the gas tax has been impacted by the pandemic. Another revenue
estimating conference is likely to be scheduled. FDOT is reviewing work program to be prepared, primarily
for FDOT projects, but also local priority projects, to see if any can be deferred. Also, public meetings
scheduled on I-75 Managed Lane Study were postponed during the quarantine. FDOT is looking at
scheduling them again. In the meantime, study information is posted on: www.FWSLinterchange.com
Committee Actions
• Reviewed and endorsed 2020 Project Priorities with some corrections to TRIP annotations and
recommendation to include both the current 2045 LRTP and the future 2050 LRTP as planning
priorities this year
• Endorsed the FY2021-2025 TIP
• Endorsed the Public Participation Plan Amendment noting that emergency provisions for public
involvement follow federal guidance and that MPO Board will ratify actions taken by MPO Chair
in order to meet state and federal deadlines during emergency situations.
• Received a briefing and provided input on the 2045 LRTP roadway network scenario planning.
Asked questions to clarify statements in draft report and offered to hold additional meetings in
June, July and August to keep up with FDOT’s planning model development schedule.
Conservancy of SW Florida expressed concern with projects numbered 1-10 (map ID, not priority)
on Alternate 1 and Alternative 2. The Conservancy expressed concern over the projects in the
Alternatives which may have significant environmental impacts. The consultant explained the
reasoning for evaluating the alternatives and that these models were based on the 2040 LRTP Needs
Network and the established E+C Network. There was discussion related to the LRTP process and
the development of the 2040 LRTP. MPO staff asked Conservancy to update and try to streamline
concerns raised in 2015 that will be resubmitted with this LRTP. The Conservancy stated that the
cost of environmental mitigation was a major issue. Discussion followed concerning planning level
cost estimating and need for consistent approach taken by MPOs in Florida. Kyle Purvis, FDOT,
offered to brief Conservancy on FDOT’s Costing Tool. Lawrence Massey, FDOT, suggested
modifying socio-economic assumptions as alternative to building roads in environmentally
sensitive areas. It was noted that FDOT assumes 10-lanes on I-75 with 2 managed lanes, 3 regular
lanes in each direction – coded into the model. The TAC suggested modeling an 8-lane alternative
and FDOT indicated it would be valid to test, however response from model development section
later indicated FDOT has already identified the I-75 cross section as 10 lanes, based on draft SIS
2045 Cost Feasible Plan.
• Endorsed Collier County National Highway System (NHS) Justification Report and SR 82 NHS
Justification Report.
7.B.1.a
Packet Pg. 545 Attachment: TAC Chair Report (12573 : Technical Advisory Committee Chair Report)
Reports and Presentations
• FDOT presented on SIS 2045 Cost Feasible Plan
Distribution Items
• n/a
The next 3 meetings are anticipated to be held as virtual meetings and are in addition to the regular meeting
calendar to assist the MPO in formulating roadway network alternatives for the 2045 LRTP and reviewing
FDOT’s planning model outputs. They are scheduled for June 10, July 8 and August 7, 2020 at 9:30 a.m.
7.B.1.a
Packet Pg. 546 Attachment: TAC Chair Report (12573 : Technical Advisory Committee Chair Report)
06/12/2020
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee Chair Report
OBJECTIVE: For the MPO Board to receive a report from the Chair of the Bicycle and Pedestrian
Advisory Committee (BPAC) related to recent committee actions and recommendations.
CONSIDERATIONS: Staff prepared the attached written report. The BPAC Chair will provide a verbal
report providing additional information regarding recent committee activities.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Committee recommendations are reported in the Executive
Summary for each action item, and may be elaborated upon by the Chair in his/her report to the Board.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable
Prepared by: Anne McLaughlin, MPO Director
ATTACHMENT(S)
1. BPAC Chair Report (DOCX)
7.C.1
Packet Pg. 547
06/12/2020
COLLIER COUNTY
Metropolitan Planning Organization
Item Number: 7.C.1
Doc ID: 12579
Item Summary: Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee Chair Report
Meeting Date: 06/12/2020
Prepared by:
Title: – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Karen Intriago
06/04/2020 10:18 AM
Submitted by:
Title: Executive Director - MPO – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Anne McLaughlin
06/04/2020 10:18 AM
Approved By:
Review:
Metropolitan Planning Organization Brandy Otero MPO Analyst Review Completed 06/04/2020 11:09 AM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin MPO Executive Director Review Completed 06/04/2020 11:11 AM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin Meeting Pending 06/12/2020 9:00 AM
7.C.1
Packet Pg. 548
BPAC Committee Chair Report
The Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) met using ZOOM as a virtual meeting platform
on May 19, 2020 and a quorum was achieved.
Agency Reports
FDOT – Ms. Chesna will send out a link to Connect Ped that has a map of bike-ped facilities and also has
a crash map, it’s a good resource for us and our partners. Ms. Peters – we are in the process of vetting and
doing constructability reviews for bike-ped priority projects; we have meetings coming up with our
engineers and project staff. It’s ongoing.
MPO - Introduced two new appointees – Kim Jacob and Patty Huff. Explained that Board directed staff to
expand BPAC membership from 11 to 12 to accommodate both applicants. In the meantime, a second
vacancy opened up, so both were able to join in time to attend today. The amendment to MPO Bylaws
expanding membership from 11 to 12 will continue forward and be voted on at the MPO June 12 Board
meeting. Committee members discussed the pros and cons of expanding the size of the committee. Some
members were supportive, others were not. No vote was taken.
Committee Actions
• Reviewed and commented on Collier County FY20-25 Resurfacing Plan; focused on the first two years
of the plan and will revisit when meet again in August. MPO staff compiling report from first committee
review and will share with County Road Maintenance Division Director and Transportation Planning
Division Director. Highlights included:
o Can shoulder construction be added as a bid item to the County Annual paving contract?
o Review all bike lanes that are being repainted as part of repaving project and see if they
can be widened to new MUTCD standard of 5’-wide, especially leading into intersections
o Would like to see improved bike accommodations – lane or shoulder widths increased –
on
▪ Santa Barbara Blvd from Radio to golden Gate Main Canal
▪ Logan from Pine Ridge to Green
▪ Immokalee Rd from Logan to 951 and from Logan to I-75
▪ Everglades Blvd from Oil Well to Immokalee RD, and from Golden Gate Blvd to
I-75
▪ Pine Ridge from I-75 to Logan
▪ Vanderbilt Beach Rd from Tamiami Trail to Goodlette and from Weber to east
extension (include improvements in 6-lane expansion)
▪ CR 29 from Tamiami Trail/US41 south to Chokoloskee, consider road diet from 2
to 1 travel lane in each direction to accommodate bike lanes
Reports and Presentations
• Staff gave an update on the 2020 Bike/Ped Priorities going to MPO Board in June
• Staff gave an update on the Local Roads Safety Plan with an emphasis on Board direction regarding
the public safety education component
7.C.1.a
Packet Pg. 549 Attachment: BPAC Chair Report (12579 : Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee Chair Report)
• The next regularly scheduled meeting is on August 18, 2020 at 9:00 a.m.
7.C.1.a
Packet Pg. 550 Attachment: BPAC Chair Report (12579 : Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee Chair Report)
06/12/2020
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Congestion Management Committee Chair Report
OBJECTIVE: For the MPO Board to receive a report from the Chair of the Congestion Management
Committee related to recent committee actions and recommendations.
CONSIDERATIONS: Staff prepared the attached written report. Staff typically provides a verbal report
at the MPO Board meeting, although the Chair is welcome to do so.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Committee recommendations are reported in the Executive
Summary for each action item, and may be elaborated upon by the Chair in his/her report to the Board.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable
Prepared by: Anne McLaughlin, MPO Director
ATTACHMENT(S)
1. CMC Chair Report (DOCX)
7.D.1
Packet Pg. 551
06/12/2020
COLLIER COUNTY
Metropolitan Planning Organization
Item Number: 7.D.1
Doc ID: 12574
Item Summary: Congestion Management Committee Chair Report
Meeting Date: 06/12/2020
Prepared by:
Title: – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Karen Intriago
06/04/2020 7:49 AM
Submitted by:
Title: Executive Director - MPO – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Anne McLaughlin
06/04/2020 7:49 AM
Approved By:
Review:
Metropolitan Planning Organization Brandy Otero MPO Analyst Review Completed 06/04/2020 8:53 AM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin MPO Executive Director Review Completed 06/04/2020 9:08 AM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin Meeting Pending 06/12/2020 9:00 AM
7.D.1
Packet Pg. 552
CMC Committee Chair Report
The Congestion Management Committee (CMC) met using ZOOM as a virtual meeting platform on May
20, 2020 and a quorum was achieved.
The committee received agency updates from FDOT and committee members.
Committee Action Items
• Reviewed an update on the Baseline Conditions Report of the Transportation System Performance
Report and provided input on identifying congestion reduction strategies for the Action Plan.
Reports and Presentations
• Received a presentation on the status of the Collier Area Transit Park and Ride Study.
The next regularly scheduled meeting will be held on July 15, 2020 at @ 2 p.m.
7.D.1.a
Packet Pg. 553 Attachment: CMC Chair Report (12574 : Congestion Management Committee Chair Report)
06/12/2020
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Local Coordinating Board Chair Report
OBJECTIVE: For the MPO Board to receive a report from the Chair of the Local Coordinating Board
(LCB) related to recent LCB actions and recommendations.
CONSIDERATIONS: Staff prepared the attached written report. The LCB Chair may provide
additional information to the Board.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Committee recommendations are reported in the Executive
Summary for each action item, and may be elaborated upon by the Chair in his/her report to the Board.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable
Prepared by: Josephine Medina, Senior Planner
ATTACHMENT(S)
1. LCB Chair Report (DOCX)
7.E.1
Packet Pg. 554
06/12/2020
COLLIER COUNTY
Metropolitan Planning Organization
Item Number: 7.E.1
Doc ID: 12576
Item Summary: Local Coordinating Board Chair Report
Meeting Date: 06/12/2020
Prepared by:
Title: – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Karen Intriago
06/04/2020 9:17 AM
Submitted by:
Title: Executive Director - MPO – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Anne McLaughlin
06/04/2020 9:17 AM
Approved By:
Review:
Metropolitan Planning Organization Brandy Otero MPO Analyst Review Completed 06/04/2020 9:23 AM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin MPO Executive Director Review Completed 06/04/2020 9:26 AM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin Meeting Pending 06/12/2020 9:00 AM
7.E.1
Packet Pg. 555
LCB Chair Report
The Local Coordinating Board (LCB) conducted a hybrid virtual meeting on June 3rd and a quorum was
attained.
The LCB took the following action at the meeting:
• Reviewed and approved an updated LCB Grievance Policy
• Review and approved the annual Community Transportation Coordinator (CTC) Evaluation.
• Reviewed and approved the 2020 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan Minor Update
• Endorsed the Fiscal Year 2020/21 Transportation Disadvantaged Planning Grant application and
resolution.
• Reviewed and approved the after the fact submittal of the Public Transit and Neighborhood
Enhancement Division’s Shirley Conroy grant application to purchase a vehicle for the paratransit
service.
The LCB received an update on the impact to CAT paratransit operations due to COVID-19.
The next LCB meeting is scheduled for September 3, 2020 at 1:30 p.m., at the Collier County Government
Center, Building F, Information Technology Training Room, 5th Floor - 3299 E. Tamiami Trail, Naples.
7.E.1.a
Packet Pg. 556 Attachment: LCB Chair Report (12576 : Local Coordinating Board Chair Report)
06/12/2020
BOARD ACTION
Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing
Resolution
OBJECTIVE: For the Board to adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)
and authorizing resolution
CONSIDERATIONS: The Draft FY2021-2025 TIP was first posted on the MPO’s website and
distributed to advisory committees and the MPO’s Advisory Network on March 27, 2020, after the March
30th committee meetings were canceled due to the COVID-19 pandemic. No additional public comments
have been received beyond those reported in Appendix G, which were gathered during the joint
FDOT/MPO outreach on FDOT’s Draft Tentative Work Program held at Orange Blossom Library on
October 21, 2019. MPO staff has incorporated minor revisions suggested by Technical Advisory
Committee members and FDOT’s updated Work Program snapshot dated April 13, 2020. MPO staff
requested, but has not yet received, comments from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). The
FY2021-2025 TIP is shown in its entirety in Attachment 1.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: The Technical Advisory Committee and the Citizens
Advisory Committee voted unanimously to endorse the FY2021-FY2025 TIP at their (virtual) meetings
held on May 18, 2020.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the Board adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation
Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution.
Prepared By: Anne McLaughlin, MPO Director
ATTACHMENT(S)
1. FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (PDF)
2. Resolution 2020-07 (PDF)
8.A
Packet Pg. 557
06/12/2020
COLLIER COUNTY
Metropolitan Planning Organization
Item Number: 8.A
Doc ID: 12552
Item Summary: Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and
Authorizing Resolution
Meeting Date: 06/12/2020
Prepared by:
Title: – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Karen Intriago
06/03/2020 11:01 AM
Submitted by:
Title: Executive Director - MPO – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Anne McLaughlin
06/03/2020 11:01 AM
Approved By:
Review:
Metropolitan Planning Organization Brandy Otero MPO Analyst Review Completed 06/03/2020 11:10 AM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin MPO Executive Director Review Completed 06/04/2020 8:32 AM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin Meeting Pending 06/12/2020 9:00 AM
8.A
Packet Pg. 558
COLLIERMETROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATIONTRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMFY2021-FY2025Pending Adoption: June 12, 2020QR Code-UPDATE.The preparation of this report has been financed in part through grants from the Federal Highway Administration and Federal Transit Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, under the Metropolitan Planning Program, Sections 134 and 135 of Title 23 U.S. Code. The contents of this report do not necessarily reflect the official views or policy of the U.S. Department of Transportation.8.A.1
Packet Pg. 559 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
COLLIER METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATIONCouncilman Elaine Middelstaedt Esq., CityofEverglades City Councilman Eric BrechnitzMPO Vice-Chair CityofMarco Island Commissioner William L. McDaniel Jr.Collier County (District5)Commissioner Andy Solis,Esq.Collier County (District2)Commissioner PennyTaylorCollier County (District4)Scott R. Teach,Esq.Commissioner Donna Fiala Collier County (District 1) Commissioner Burt L. Saunders Collier County (District 3) CouncilmanCityofNaplesCouncilmanCityofNaples Anne McLaughlin MPO Executive Director Collier County DeputyAttorney8.A.1
Packet Pg. 560 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 561 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 562 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
1MPO RESOLUTION #2020-XXA RESOLUTION OF THE COLLIER METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION ENDORSINGTHE FY 2020/21–2024/25TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (TIP)WHEREAS, the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization is required to develop an annually updated Transportation Improvement Program pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 134(j), 23 C.F.R. 450.104, 23 C.F.R. 450.324(a), and F.S. 339.175(8)(c)(1); and WHEREAS, the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization has reviewed the proposed Transportation Improvement Program and determined that is consistent with its adopted Plans and Program; and WHEREAS, in accordance with the Florida Department of Transportation’s MPO Administrative Manual, the Transportation Improvement Program must be accompanied by an endorsement indicating official MPO approval;THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVEDby the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization that:1.The FY 2020/21–2024/25Transportation Improvement Program and the projects programmed therein are hereby adopted.2.The Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization’s Chairman is hereby authorized to execute this Resolution certifying the MPO Board’s endorsement of the FY 2020/21–2024/25Transportation Improvement Program and the projects programmed therein.This Resolution PASSED and duly adopted by the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization Board after majority vote on this 12thday of June 2020.Attest:COLLIER METROPOLITAN PLANNNING ORGANIZATIONBy: _________________________By: _____________________________________________Anne McLaughlinCouncilwoman Elaine MiddelstaedtMPO Executive DirectorCollier MPO ChairmanApproved as to form and legality:______________________________Scott R. Teach, Deputy County Attorney8.A.1
Packet Pg. 563 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
2Figure 1 – Collier Metropolitan Planning Area (MPA)8.A.1
Packet Pg. 564 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
3Figure 2 –Bonita Springs –Naples Urbanized Area Map8.A.1
Packet Pg. 565 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
4NARRATIVEPURPOSEThe Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) is required by Federal and State Statutes1; and Federal Transportation Legislation, Moving Ahead for Progress in the Twenty-First Century Act (MAP-21) and the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act (FAST Act) signed into law in December 2015, to develop a TransportationImprovementProgram(TIP)thatisapprovedbyboththeMPOandtheGovernorofFlorida(ortheGovernor’s delegate). The FAST Act (23 U.S.C. 133(h) §1109) carries forward policies initiated by MAP-21, which created a streamlined and performance-based surface transportation program that builds on many of the highway, transit, bike, and pedestrian programs and policies established in previous transportation legislation. These programs address the many challenges facing the U.S. transportation system including: improving safety, maintaining infrastructure condition, reducing traffic congestion, improving efficiency of the system and of freight movement, protecting the environment, and reducing delays in project delivery. The FAST Act added reducing or mitigating storm water impacts of surface transportation, and enhancing travel and tourism to the nationwide transportation goals identified in MAP-21.The FAST Act establishes the Nationally Significant Freight and Highway Projects (NSFHP) program to provide competitive grants –Fostering Advancement in Shipping and Transportationfor the Long-term Achievement of National Efficiencies (FASTLANE) –to nationally and regionally significant freight and highway projects that align with national transportationgoals.The TIP is developed by the MPO in cooperation with the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), state and local governments, and public transit operators who are each responsible for providing the MPO with estimates of available federal and state funds. This collaborative effort ensures that projects programmed in the FDOT Work Program address the MPO’s highest transportation project priorities and are consistent with the overall transportation goals of the surrounding metropolitan area. Following approval by the MPO Board and the Governor of Florida, the TIP is included in the FDOT State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP). The TIP is a five-year, fiscally constrained, multi-modal program of transportation projects within the Collier Metropolitan Planning Area (MPA). The MPA is the geographic planning region for the MPO (see Figure 1 above). The projects in the TIP are presented in Year of Expenditure (YOE) dollars which takes inflation into account. TIP projects include highway, transit, sidewalk/bicycle paths and/or facilities, congestion management, road and 123 United States Code (U.S.C.) 134(j) and (k)(3) and (4);23 U.S.C.204; 49 U.S.C.5303;23 Code of Federal Regulations Part 450 Sections 326, 328, 330, 332 and 334; and Florida Statutes(F.S.) s.339.175, s339.135(4)(c)and 4(d), and 427.051(1)8.A.1
Packet Pg. 566 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
5bridge maintenance, transportation planning, and transportation alternative program activities to be funded by 23 C.F.R. 450.324(c). The TIP also includes aviation projects; and all regionally significant transportation projects for which Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) or Federal Transit Administration (FTA) approval is required. For informational purposes, this TIP also identifies other transportation projects, as defined in 40 CFR 450.324 (c)(d), that are not funded with federalfunds.The TIP for theCollier MPO is fiscally constrained by year so that financial resources can be directed towards high priority transportation needs in the area. Consequently, the level of authorized funding (both current and projected) available to the state and the MPO is used as the basis for financial restraint and scheduling of federally funded projectswithintheMPO’sjurisdiction.FDOTusesthelatestprojectcostestimates,andthelatestprojectedrevenues basedonadistrict-widestatutoryformulatoimplementprojectswithintheCollierMPOintheWorkProgram,andthis is reflected in the TIP as well. This TIP is also constrained due to local funds from local governments’ Capital Improvement Programs committed to certain projects in the TIP. This TIP has been developed in cooperation with the FDOT. FDOT provided the MPO with estimates of available federal and state funds, as shown in the Table on the following page. The TIP is updated annually by adding a “new fifth year” which maintains a five-year rolling timeframe for the TIP. In addition to carrying forward existing projects, the MPO annually approves a set of new TransportationProjectPrioritiesandsubmitsthesetoFDOTpriortoJuly1st.Thisnewsetofpriorities,whichmaybe eligible for funding in the following year, is drawn from the Collier 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP). Projects are selected based on their potential to improve transportation safety and/or performance; increase capacity or relieve congestion; and preserve existing infrastructure. FDOT uses, in part, the MPO’s priorities in developing the new fifth year of the FDOT Five-Year Work Program which is also a rolling five-year program. The TIP is developed with consideration of the ten planning factors from MAP-21 and the FAST Act which are listed below.1.Supporttheeconomicvitalityofthemetropolitanarea,especiallybyenablingglobalcompetitiveness, productivity, andefficiency.2.Increase the safety of the transportation system for motorized and non-motorizedusers.3.Increase the security of the transportation system for the motorized and non-motorizedusers.4.Increase the accessibility and mobility of people and forfreight.5.Protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, improve the quality of life, and promote consistency between transportation improvements and State and local planned growth and economic developmentpatterns.6.Enhancetheintegrationandconnectivityofthetransportationsystem,acrossandbetweenmodes,for people andfreight.8.A.1
Packet Pg. 567 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
67.Promote efficient system management andoperation.8.Emphasizethepreservationoftheexistingtransportationsystem.9.Reduceormitigatestormwaterimpactsofsurfacetransportation10.Enhance travel andtourism.FUNDING SOURCESTheprojects identified in this TIP are funded with Federal, State, and local revenues. The FDOT Fiscal Year (FY) 2021-2025Tentative Work Program (February 4, 2020Snapshot), which will be formally adopted on July 1, 2020,specifies revenue sources for each project. Figure 3 and Figure 4 illustrate the Collier MPO TIP’s total funding by year and total funding by mode. The total funding fluctuates from one fiscal year to another based on the phases that projects are in andthesizeandnumberofprojectsprogrammedinthatyear.TotalfundingforthisTIPis$488million,adecreaseof$6million (1%) when compared to the FY2020-FY2024TIP. Total includes $119million in resurfacing; $86million on I-75 and $33million on US41.Please see Appendix H, page XXX,which detail’s the TIP’s fiscal constraint. 8.A.1
Packet Pg. 568 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
78.A.1
Packet Pg. 569 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8HIGHWAY FUNDING SOURCESSurface Transportation Block Group Program (STBGP): The STBGP provides legislatively specifiedflexible funding that may be used by states and localities for projects on any Federal-aid eligible highway including the National Highway System (NHS), bridge projects on any public road, transitcapital projects, and intra-city and inter-city bus terminals and facilities. These flexible funds are not based on a restrictive definition of program eligibility and allow local areas to chooselocalplanningpriorities.TherearealsoflexibleFTAUrbanFormula8.A.1
Packet Pg. 570 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
9Funds.STBGPfundscanbeusedtoincrease capacity, improve safety, relieve congestion and enhance transportation systems. The level of STBGP funding is determined by aformula.Strategic Intermodal System (SIS): Created in 2003, the SIS is a highpriority network of transportation facilities critical to Florida’s economic competitiveness and quality of life. The SIS includes the State's largest and most significant highways, commercial service airports, spaceports, waterways and deep-water seaports, rail corridors, freight rail terminals, and passenger rail and intercity busterminals.I-75,State Route 29 and State Route 82 areidentified as SIS facilities.The Collier and Lee County MPOs jointly adopt regional priority lists to access SIS funds8.A.1
Packet Pg. 571 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
10Transportation Regional Incentive Program (TRIP): The TRIP was created pursuant to § 339.2819 and §339.155 Florida Statutes to provide an incentive for regional cooperation to leverage investments in regionally significant transportation facilities including both roadsandpublictransportation.TRIPfundsprovidestatematchingfundsforimprovementsidentifiedandprioritizedbyregional partners which meet certain criteria. TRIP funds are used to match local or regional funds by providing up to 50% of the total project cost for public transportation projects. In-kind matches such as right-of-way donations and private funds made available to the regional partners are also allowed. The Collier MPO and Lee County MPO Boards jointly adopt regional priorities to access TRIPfunds.Regional Projects: Regionally significant projects are projects that are located on the regional network (see Appendix B). FDOT may program State dedicated revenues to fund prioritized regionally significant projects.TransportationAlternativesProgram(TAP):TheTAPwasestablishedbyMAP-21asanewfundingprogrampursuantto 23 U.S.C. 213(b). Eligible activities under TAPinclude:1.Transportation Alternatives as defined in 23 U.S.C. 101(a)(29) and MAP-21§1103:Construction, planning, and design of on-road and off-road trail facilities for pedestrians, bicyclists, and other non-motorized forms of transportation including sidewalks, bicycle infrastructure, pedestrian and bicycle signals, traffic calming techniques, lighting and other safety-related infrastructure, and transportation projects to achieve compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 [42 USC 12101 etseq.].Construction, planning, and design of infrastructure-related projects and systems that will provide safe routes fornon-driversincludingchildren,olderadults,andindividualswithdisabilitiestoaccesstransportationneeds.Conversion and use of abandoned railroad corridors to trails for pedestrians, bicyclists, or other non-motorized transportationusers.Construction of turnouts, overlooks and viewingareas.8.A.1
Packet Pg. 572 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
11E. Communityimprovementactivitieswhichincludebut are not limitedto:•inventory, control, or removal of outdooradvertising;•historicpreservationandrehabilitationofhistoric transportationfacilities;•vegetationmanagementpracticesintransportationrights-of-way to improve roadway safety, prevent against invasive species, and provide erosion control;and•archaeological activities relating to impacts from implementingatransportationprojecteligibleunder23USC.F. Anyenvironmentalmitigationactivityincludingpollution prevention and pollution abatement activitiesto:•address stormwater management andcontrol;waterpollutionprevention or abatement related to highway construction or due to highway runoff including activities described in 23 USC 133(b)(11), 328(a) and 329;•reducevehicle-causedwildlifemortalityorrestoreandmaintain connectivity among terrestrial or aquatichabitats.2.The recreational trails program under 23 USC206.Rich King Memorial Greenway8.A.1
Packet Pg. 573 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
123.Safe Routes to School Program (SRTS) eligible projects and activitieslistedin the FAST Actincluding:Infrastructure-relatedprojects.Non-infrastructurerelatedactivities.Safe Routes to Schoolcoordinator.4.Planning,designingorconstructingboulevardsandotherroadwayslargelyintheright-of-wayofformerInterstateSystem routes or other dividedhighways.TAP funds cannot be used for:StateorMPOadministrativepurposes,exceptforSRTSadministrationandadministrativecostsoftheState permitted Recreational Trails Program (RTP) set-asidefunds.Promotional activities, except as permitted under theSRTS.Generalrecreationandparkfacilities,playgroundequipment,sportsfields,campgrounds,picnicareasetc.Routine maintenance andoperations.TRANSIT FUNDING SOURCESFDOT and the FTA both provide funding opportunities for transit and transportation disadvantaged projects through 8.A.1
Packet Pg. 574 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
13specializedprograms.Inaddition,FHWAtransfersfundstoFTAwhichprovidesubstantialadditionalfundingfortransitand transportation disadvantaged projects. When FHWA funds are transferred to FTA,theyare transferred to FTA Urbanized Area Formula Program (§5307). According to FTA Circular 9070.1G, at a State’s discretion Surface Transportation funds may be “flexed” for transit capital projects through the Non-Urbanized Area Formula Program (§5311), and according to FTA Circular 9040.1G with certain FHWA funds to Elderly and Persons with Disabilities Program (§5310). In urbanized areas over 200,000 in population, the decision on the transfer of flexible funds is made by the MPO. In areas under 200,000 in population, the decision is made by the MPO in cooperation with FDOT. In rural areas, the transfer decision is made by FDOT. The decision to transfer funds flows from the transportation planning process and established priorities.§5305: Metropolitan Transportation Planning Program Funds: State Departments of Transportation sub-allocate § 5 3 0 5 formula-based program funding to MPOs including the Collier MPO. The program provides funding to support cooperative, continuous, and comprehensive planning for making transportation investmentdecisions in metropolitan areas as well as statewide. Funds are available for planning activities that (a) support the economic vitality of the metropolitan area, especially by enabling global competitiveness, productivity, and efficiency; (b) increase the safety andsecurity of the transportation system for motorized and non-motorized users; (c) increase the accessibility and mobility of people and freight; (d) protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, improve the quality of life, and promote consistency between transportation improvements and State and local planned growth and economic development patterns; (e) enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system for people and freight across and between modes; (f) promote efficient system management and operation; and (g) emphasize preservation of the existing transportationsystem.§5307-Urbanized Area (UZA) Formula Program Funds: The Bonita Springs (Naples) FL UZA receives an annual allocation of § 5307 funding which may be used for: (a) transit capital and operating assistance in urbanized areas; (b) transportationrelatedplanning;(c)planning,engineering,designandevaluationoftransitprojects;and(d)othertechnical transportation-related studies. Eligible capital investments include: (a) replacement, overhaul and rebuilding of buses;(b)crime prevention and security equipment; (c) construction of maintenance and passenger facilities; (d) new and existing fixed guide-way systems including rolling stock and rail stations; and (e) overhaul and rebuilding of vehicles, track, signals, communications, and computer hardware and software. All preventive maintenance and some Americans with DisabilitiesAct(ADA)complementaryparatransitservicecostsareconsideredeligiblecapitalcosts. MAP-21amendedthis program to include expanded eligibility for operating expenses for systems with 100 or fewer buses. Collier County receives at least $2 million dollars each year to assist in transit capital expenses. Local/State matches for §5307 consist of toll revenue credits issued by FDOT and local funds which follow FTA match guidelines. For urbanized areas with populations g r e a t e r t h a n 200,000, including Collier County, funds are apportioned and flow directly to a locally selected designated 8.A.1
Packet Pg. 575 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
14recipient. Collier County is the designated recipient for the urbanized area § 5307funding.§5310–Transportation for Elderly Persons and Persons with Disabilities: The Federal goal of the §5310 program is to provide assistance in meeting the needs of elderly persons and persons with disabilities where public transit services are unavailable,insufficientorinappropriate.Fundsareapportionedbasedoneachstate’spopulationshareofthesegroupsof people. Eligible activities for §5310 funding include: (a) services developed that are beyond what is required by the American’s with Disabilities Act; (b) projects that will improve access to fixed route service and/or decrease reliance by individualswithdisabilitiesoncomplementaryparatransit;and(c)projectsthatprovideanalternativetopublictransportation that assists seniors and individuals withdisabilities.MAP-21 apportions these funds to designated recipients based on a formula. In Florida, the §5310 Program is administered by FDOT on behalf of FTA with funding allocated to the Bonita Springs (Naples) Urbanized Area. Projects selected must be included in a locally developed, coordinated public transit human services transportation plan. FDOT calls for § 5310 applications annually and awards funds through a competitive process.§ 5311 -Rural Area Formula Grant: This program (49 U.S.C. 5311) provides formula funding to states to support public transportation in areas with populations less than 50,000. Program funds are apportioned to each state based on a formula that uses land area, population and transit service. According to Federal program rules, program funds may be used for capital operating, state administration, and project administration expenses; however, Florida allows eligible capitaland operating expenses.InFlorida,the§5311ProgramisadministeredbyFDOT.ProgramfundsaredistributedtoeachFDOTdistrictofficebased on its percentage of the state’s rural population. Each district office allocates program funds to designated eligible recipients through an annual grant application process. §5311 funds in Collier County are used to provide fixed route service to rural areas such as Immokalee and Golden GateEstates.§5339–Bus and Bus Facilities Funds: This program makes federal resources available to state and direct recipientstoreplace,rehabilitateandpurchasebusesandrelatedequipment,andtoconstructbus-relatedfacilitiesincludingtechnological changes or innovations to modify low or no emission vehicles or facilities. Funding is provided through formula allocations and competitive grants. Asub-program provides competitive grants for bus and bus facility projects that support low and zero-emission vehicles. Eligible recipients include direct recipients that operate fixed route bus service or that allocate funding to fixed route bus operators; state or local governmental entities; and federally recognizedNativeAmericantribesthatoperatefixedroutebusservicethatareeligibletoreceivedirectgrantsunder§5307 and 8.A.1
Packet Pg. 576 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
15§5311-Transportation Disadvantaged Program Funds: Chapter 427, Florida Statutes, established the Florida Commission for the Transportation Disadvantaged (CTD) with the responsibility to coordinate transportation services provided to the transportation disadvantaged through the Florida Coordinated Transportation System. The CTD also administers the Transportation Disadvantaged Trust Fund. Transportation disadvantaged individuals are those who cannot obtain their own transportation due to disability, age, orincome.The Collier MPO, through the Local Coordinating Board (LCB), identifies local service needs and provides information, advice and direction to the Community Transportation Coordinator (CTC) on the coordination of services to be provided to the transportation disadvantaged [Chapter 427, Florida Statutes]. The Collier County Board of County Commissioners(BCC) is designated as the CTC for Collier County and is responsible for ensuring that coordinated transportation services are provided to the transportation disadvantaged population of Collier County.Public Transit Block Grant Program: The Public Transit Block Grant Program was established by the Florida Legislature to provide a stable source of funding for public transit [341.052 Florida Statutes]. Specific program guidelines are providedin FDOT Procedure Topic Number 725-030-030. Funds are awarded by FDOT to those public transit providers eligible to receive funding from FTA’s §5307 and §5311 programs and to Community Transportation Coordinators. Public Transit Block Grant funds may be used for eligible capital and operating costs of providing publictransit service. Program funds may also be used for transit service development and transit corridor projects. Public Transit Block Grant projects must be consistent with applicable approved local government comprehensive plans.PublicTransitServiceDevelopmentProgram:ThePublicTransitServiceDevelopmentProgramwasenactedbytheFlorida Legislature to provide initial funding for special projects [341Florida Statutes]. Specific program guidelines are provided inFDOT Procedure Topic Number 725-030-005. The program is selectively applied to determine whether new or innovative techniques or measures could be used to improve or expand public transit services. Service Development Projects specifically include projects involving the use of new technologies for services, routes or vehicle frequencies; the purchase of special transportation services; and other such techniques for increasing service to the riding public. Projects involvingthe application of new technologies or methods for improving operations, maintenance, and marketing in public transit systemsarealsoeligibleforServiceDevelopmentProgramfunding.ServiceDevelopmentprojectsaresubjecttospecified times of duration with a maximum of three years. If determined to be successful, Service Development Projects must be continued by the public transit provider without additional Public Transit Service Development ProgramFunds.8.A.1
Packet Pg. 577 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
16ADDRESSING PERFORMANCE MEASURES AND TARGETSPerformance management is a strategic approach to connect investment and policy decisions to help achieve performance goals. Performance measures are quantitative criteria used to evaluate progress. Performance measure targets are the benchmarks against which progress is assessed using available data. The Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21stCentury Act (MAP-21) requires state departments of transportation (DOT) and metropolitan planning organizations (MPO) to conduct performance-based planning by tracking performance measures and establishing data-driven targets to improve those measures. Performance-based planning ensures the most efficient investment of transportation funds by increasing accountability, providing transparency, and linking investment decisions to key outcomes related to seven national goals:8.A.1
Packet Pg. 578 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
17Improving safety;Maintaining infrastructure condition;Reducing traffic congestion;Improving the efficiency of the system and freight movement;Protecting the environment; andReducing delays in project delivery.The Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act supplements MAP-21 by establishing timelines for state DOTs and MPOs to comply with the requirements of MAP-21. The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) and MPOs must coordinate when selecting PM1, PM2, and PM3 performance targets, and public transportation providers must coordinate with states and MPOs in the selection of state and MPO transit asset management and transit safety performance targets.FDOT and the MPOAC developed the TPM Consensus Planning Document to describe the processes through which FDOT, the MPOs, and the providers of public transportation in MPO planning areas will cooperatively develop and share information related to transportation performance management and target setting. HIGHWAY SAFETY PERFORMANCE MEASURES (PM1)Safety is the first national goal identified in the FAST Act. In March 2016, the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) and Safety Performance Management Measures Rule (Safety PM Rule) werefinalized and published in the Federal Register. The rule requires MPOs to establish targets for the following safety-related performance measures and report progress to the state DOT:1.Number of Fatalities;2.Rate of Fatalities per 100M Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT); and3.Number of Serious Injuries;4.Rate of Serious Injuries per 100M VMT; and5.Number of Nonmotorized Fatalities and Serious Injuries.On August 31, 2019, FDOT established annual statewideperformance targets for the safety measures.On November 8,2019, the Collier MPO Board agreed to support FDOT’s statewide safety performance targets, thus agreeing to plan and 8.A.1
Packet Pg. 579 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
18program projects in the TIP that once implemented, are anticipated to make progress toward achieving the statewide targets. Table 1 presents the statewide and MPO safety targets. Table 1 –Statewide and MPO Safety Performance TargetsStatewide Safety Performance TargetStatewide Target (cy2020)MPO Target (cy2020)Number of fatalities00Rate of fatalities per 100 million vehicle miles traveled (VMT)00Number of serious injuries00Rate of serious injuries per 100 million vehicle miles traveled00Number of non-motorized fatalities and serious injuries00FDOT adopted Vision Zero in 2012.This, in effect, became FDOT’s target for zero traffic fatalities and quantified the policy set by Florida’s Legislature 35 years ago (Section 334.046(2), Florida Statutes, emphasis added): “The mission of the Department of Transportation shall be to provide a safestatewide transportation system…”Safety is the first goal of the Florida Transportation Plan (FTP), the state’s long-range transportation plan, and the emphasis of Florida’s Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP). The FTP, published in 2015, includes the number of transportation-related fatalities as an indicator to watch. he SHSP, published in 2012 and, most recently, in 2016, specifically embracesVision Zero (“Driving Down Fatalities”) and identifies potential strategies to achieve zero traffic deaths. The 2016 SHSP was developed in coordination with Florida’s 27 MPOs through Florida’s Metropolitan Planning Organization Advisory Council (MPOAC). The SHSP development process included review of safety-related goals, objectives, and strategies in MPO plans. The SHSP guides FDOT, MPOs, and other safety partners in addressing safety and defines a framework for implementation activities to be carried out throughout the state.The Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) annual report documents the statewide performance toward the zero deaths vision. For the 2019HSIP annual report, FDOT established calendar year 2020statewide safety 8.A.1
Packet Pg. 580 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
19performance targets at “0” for each safety performance measure to reflect the Department’s vision of zero deaths.TheCollier MPO, along with FDOT and other traffic safety partners, shares a high concern about the upward trendin traffic crashes, both statewide and nationally. As such, the Collier MPO supports FDOT’s statewide 2020safety targets. The safety initiatives within this TIP are intended to contribute toward achieving these targets. Safety performance measure targets are required to be adopted on an annual basis. FDOT, in August of each calendar year, will report the following year’s targets inthe HSIP Annual Report. After FDOT adopts the targets, the MPO is required to either adopt FDOT’s targets or establish its own targets by the following February.Baseline ConditionsCrash data and Vehicle Miles traveled (VMT) for the most recent five-yearrolling average (2013-2017) were used to establish a baseline for safety performance measures (See Table 2). Data sources for Table 2 are FDOT’s Crash Analysis Reporting (CAR) database and Transportation and Data Analytics Office. 8.A.1
Packet Pg. 581 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
20Table 2 –Baseline Safety Performance Measures –2013-2017 Rolling Five-Year AveragePerformance MeasureFloridaCollier MPONumber of Fatalities2,979.036.2Number of Serious Injuries20,653.6186.2Fatality Rate per 100 million Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT)1.3981.038Serious Injury Rate per 100 million Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT)9.7325.263Total number of non-motorized fatalities and serious injuries3,267.039.2Trends AnalysisTheCollier MPOTIP development process, consistent with the process used to develop the MPO’s Long-Range Transportation Plan(LRTP), includes analysis of safety data trends, including the location and factors associated with crashes with emphasis on fatalities and serious injuries. These data are used to help identify regional safety issues and potential safety strategies for the LRTP and TIP.TheCollierMPO also uses crash data to analyze trends and identify regional safety issues. Tracking these measures will help toestimate the effectiveness of future MPO transportation investments, as reflected in the TIP. Table 3 shows the Safety Performance Measuredata for the Collier MPO for the last five, five-year rolling averageperiodsfor which data is available. FDOT’s Crash Analysis Reporting (CAR)database and Transportation and Data Analytics Office provided the data used in Table3.Table 3 –Collier MPO -Safety Performance Reported in Five-Year Rolling Averages8.A.1
Packet Pg. 582 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
21Thedata for performance measures in Table 3 fluctuates in a narrow band around the average for that measure resulting in a relativelyundefined trend over the nine yearsof data provided.Nonetheless, the numbers reported for each measure highlight the need for continued investment in improvements in the safety of our transportation system.Safety Projects in the TIPThe MPO considers safety as a planning factor in the project selection process. One of the goals of the 2040 LRTP is Increasing the safety of the transportation system. Many of theprojects in the 2040LRTP’s Cost Feasible Planhave a safety component and as funding becomes available, theyare included in the TIP. For example, the projects to improve the I-75/ SR 951 interchange and widening and reconstructing SR29and SR82 serve the dual purpose of improving capacity and enhancing safety. The MPO makes a practice of emphasizing safety inits plans and studies. Examples include the2019Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan, whichweighted safety as the most important project selection criteriaandthe work underway on the Transportation System Performance Report, which factors in crash data to prioritize locations for improvement as part of the MPO’s Congestion Management Process.The MPO is in the process of developing aLocal Road Safety Plan (LRSP). 8.A.1
Packet Pg. 583 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
22Recommendations from the plan will be consistent with the emphasis areas of FDOT’s Strategic Highway Safety Plan and will be reflected in a future TIP. The Draft FY20/21-FY21/22Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) sets aside$100,000 for a SafetyEducation Campaign to developPublic Service Announcements (PSAs)and videosin order to implement the LRSP once it is adopted. Safety-related improvements at the project specific level arealso addressed through other MPO practices such as its series of Walkable Community studies andin the prioritization of bicycle and pedestrian and congestion management projects. Specificprojects in this TIP that improve safety include:Roadways:Roundabout –Harbour Dr. @ Crayton Rd. (FPN 4463171)Roundabout –Mooring Line Dr. @ Crayton Rd. (FPN 4463172)Intersection improvement: US 41 @ Golden Gate Parkway (FPN 4464511)Safety Project to improvecurve radii and lane width on Corkscrew Road (FPN 4463231 and 4463232)US41 Resurfacing –incorporates recommendations from FDOT 2015 RSA for Airport Rd. and US 41 (FPN 4380591)Widening and reconstructing SR82 (All of SR82 in Collier County in response to numerous traffic fatalities (FPN 4178784)Sidewalks:111thAve N: Bluebill Ave. to 7thSt. N (FPN 4418461)Bald Eagle Dr: Collier Blvd. to Old Marco Ln. (FPN 4418781)Vanderbilt Dr.: Vanderbilt Beach Rd. to 109thAve. N (FPN 4380921)Eden Park Elementary –Safe Routes to School –(FPN 4414801)Inlet Dr.: Addison Ct. to Travida Terr. (FPN 4418791)Lake Trafford Rd.: Little League Rd. to Laurel St.(FPN 4433753)Lake Trafford Rd.: Carson Rd. to Laurel St. (FPN 4433754)Copeland Ave.: Broadway south to City Limits (FPN 4370961)8.A.1
Packet Pg. 584 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
23Shadowlawn Elementary (Linwood St.) Safe Routes to School (FPN 4465501)Bike Lanes/PathsCounty Barn Rd.: Rattlesnake Hammock to Davis Blvd. (FPN 4380911)Green Blvd.: Santa Barbara Blvd. to Sunshine Blvd. (FPN 4380931)Mandarin Greenway: various locations, includes sidewalk (FPN 4404361)South Golf Dr.: Gulf Shore Blvd. to US41, includes sidewalk (FPN 4404371)San Marco Rd.: Vintage Bay Dr. to Goodland Rd. (FPN 4404381)LightingHighway lighting at various locations (FPN 4125741)Highway lighting City of Naples (FPN 4135371)Other Bicycle Detection, City of Naples (FPN 4462531)School Flashers at various locations (FPN 4462521)Emergency services/fire station, I-75 MM63 (FPN 4353891)8.A.1
Packet Pg. 585 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
24PAVEMENT and BRIDGE CONDITION MEASURES (PM2) In January 2017, USDOT published the Pavement and Bridge Condition Performance Measures Final Rule, which is also referred to as the PM2 rule.This rule establishes the following six performance measures:1.Percent of Interstate pavements in good condition;2.Percent of Interstate pavements in poor condition;3.Percent of non-Interstate National Highway System (NHS) pavements in good condition;4.Percent of non-Interstate NHS pavements in poor condition;5.Percent of NHS bridges (by deck area) classified as in good condition; and6.Percent of NHS bridges (bydeck area) classified as in poor condition.For the pavement measures, five pavement metrics are used to assess condition: International Roughness Index (IRI) -an indicator of roughness; applicable to all asphalt and concrete pavements; Cracking percent-percentage of the pavement surface exhibiting cracking; applicable to all asphalt and concrete pavements; Rutting -extent of surface depressions; applicable to asphalt pavements; Faulting -vertical misalignment of pavement joints; applicable to certain types of concrete pavements; and Present Serviceability Rating (PSR) –a quality rating applicable only to certain lower speed roads. For each pavement metric, a threshold is used to establish good, fair, or poor condition. Pavement condition is assessed for each 0.1mile section of the through travel lanes of mainline highways on the Interstate or the non-Interstate NHS using these metrics and thresholds. A pavement section is rated as good if all three metric ratings are good, and poor if two or more metric ratings are poor. Sections that are not good or poor are considered fair. The good/poor measures are expressed as a percentage and are determined by summing the total lane-miles of good or poor highway segments and dividing by the total lane-miles of all highway segments on the applicable system. 8.A.1
Packet Pg. 586 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
25Pavement in good condition suggests that no major investment is needed and should be considered for preservation treatment. Pavement in poor condition suggests major reconstruction investment is needed due to either ride quality or a structural deficiency.The bridge condition measures refer to the percentage of bridges by deck area on the NHS that are in good condition or poor condition. The measures assess the condition of four bridge components: deck, superstructure, substructure, and culverts. Each component has a metric rating threshold to establish good, fair, or poor condition. Each bridge on the NHS is evaluated using these ratings. If the lowest rating of the four metrics is greater than or equalto seven, the structure is classified as good. If the lowest rating is less than or equal to four, the structure is classified as poor. If the lowestrating is five or six, it is classified as fair. The bridge measures are expressed as the percent of NHS bridges in good or poor condition. The percent is determined by summing the total deck area of good or poor NHS bridges and dividing by the total deck area of the bridges carrying the NHS. Deck area is computed using structure length and either deck width or approach roadway width.A bridge in good condition suggests that no major investment is needed. A bridge in poor condition is safe to drive on; however, itis nearing a point where substantial reconstruction or replacement is needed.Federal rules require state DOTs and MPOs to coordinate when setting pavement and bridge condition performance targets and monitor progress towards achieving the targets. States must establish:Four-year statewide targets for the percent of interstate pavements ingood and poor condition; Two-year and four-year targets for the percent of non-Interstate NHS pavements in good and poor condition; and Two-year and four-year targets for the percent of NHS bridges (by deck area) in good and poor condition. MPOs must set four-year targets for all six measures. MPOs can either agree to program projects that will support the statewide targets or establish their own quantifiable targets for the MPO’s planning area.On May 18, 2018, FDOT established statewide performance targets for the pavement and bridge measures. OnNovember 9, 2018, the Collier MPO agreed to support FDOT’s statewide pavement and bridge performance targets, thus agreeing to plan and program projects in the TIP that once implemented, are anticipated to make progress toward achieving the statewide targets. Table 4shows the statewide targets.8.A.1
Packet Pg. 587 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
26Table4–Pavement and Bridge Condition Performance TargetsPerformance Measure2-Year Statewide Target (2019)4-Year Statewide Target (2021)Percent of Interstate Pavement in Good ConditionNot required60%Percent of Interstate Pavement in Poor ConditionNot required5%Percent of non-Interstate NHS Pavement in Good Condition40%40%Percent of non-Interstate NHS Pavement in Poor Condition5%5%Percent of NHS Bridges (by deck area) in Good Condition50%50%Percent of NHS Bridges (by deck area) in Poor Condition10%10%For comparative purposes, current statewide conditions are as follows:66 percent of the Interstate pavement is in good condition and 0.1 percent is in poor condition;45 percent of the non-Interstate NHS pavement is in good condition and 0.4 percent is in poor condition; and72 percent of NHS bridges (by deck area) is in good condition and 1 percent is in poor condition.In determining its approach to establishing performance targets for the federal pavement and bridge condition performance measures, FDOT considered many factors.To begin with, FDOT is mandated by Florida Statute 334.046 to preserve the state’s pavement and bridges to specific standards. To adhere to the statutory guidelines, FDOT prioritizes funding allocations to ensure the current transportation system is adequately preserved and maintained before funding is allocated for capacity improvements. These statutory guidelines envelope the statewide federal targets that have been established for pavements and bridges.In addition, MAP-21 requires FDOT to develop a Transportation Asset Management Plan (TAMP) for all NHS pavements and bridges within the state. The TAMP must include investment strategies leading to a program of projects that would make progress toward achievement of the state DOT targets for asset condition and performance of the NHS. FDOT’s TAMP was updated to reflect MAP-21 requirements in 2018.Further, the federal pavement condition measures require a new methodology that is a departure from the methods currently used by FDOT and uses different ratings and pavement segment lengths. For bridge condition, the performance is measured in deck area under the federal measure, while the FDOT programs its bridge repair or replacement work on a bridge by bridge basis. As such, the federal measures are not directly comparable to the methods that are most familiar 8.A.1
Packet Pg. 588 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
27to FDOT. In consideration of these differences, as well as other unknowns and unfamiliarity associated with the new required processes, FDOT took a conservative approach when establishing its initial pavement and bridge condition targets. It is the intent of FDOT to meet or exceed the established performance targets. Collier MPO’s NHS roadways are: I-75(SR 93)US41 (SR 45, Tamiami Trail)CR951between US41 and I-75.TheCollier MPO’sTIP reflects investment priorities establishedby FDOT for I-75 and US41, and are consistent with priorities identifiedin the 2040 LRTP.The focus of Collier MPO’s investments in bridge and pavement condition on the NHSinclude: Pavement replacement or reconstruction (on the NHS)o4415121 Resurfacing SR 45 (US41) from S of Dunruss Creek to S of Gulf Park Dr o4440081 Resurfacing I-75 (SR93) from Broward County Lineto Toll Bootho4463201 Resurfacing I-75 (SR93) from Toll Booth to Collier BlvdNew lanes or widenings of NHS facilities, including resurfacing existing NHS lanes associated with new capacityo4452962 I-75 at Pine Ridge Rd Interchange Improvement o4258432 I-75 (SR93) at SR951 Interchange Improvemento4419751 Add Left Turn Lane on SR 90 (US41) at Oasis Visitor CenteroSR 29 Projects to Add Lanes and Reconstruct4175402 From Oil Well Rd to Sunniland Nursery Rd4175403 From Sunniland Nursery Rd to S of AgricultureWay4175404 From S of Agriculture Way to CR846 E8.A.1
Packet Pg. 589 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
284175405 From CR846 E to N of New Market Rd N4175406 From N of New Market Rd to SR824178784 from SR82 to Hendry County LineBridge replacement or reconstruction: n/aNew bridge capacity on the NHS: n/aSystem resiliency projects that improve NHS bridge components (e.g., upgrading culverts)]; n/aThe MPO tracks and reports on performance targets in the Director’s Annual Report to the MPO Board, presented in December. The segment of CR951 between I-75 and US41 is in good condition. There are no bridges on that segment of 951. The TIP devotes a significant amount of resources to projects that will maintain pavement and bridge condition performanceon the NHS. Investments in pavement and bridge condition include pavement replacement and reconstruction, bridge replacement and reconstruction, and new bridge and pavement capacity. The TIP will fund, $102.4million for resurfacing, and $128.9 million for new capacity.The TIP will fund $7.7 million for non—NHS bridges. (Refer to project sheets in Bridge Section: 4318953 and 4348571.The projects included in the TIP are consistent with FDOT's Five Year Work Program, and therefore to FDOT’s approach to prioritize funding toensure the transportation system is adequately preserved and maintained. Per federal planning requirements, the state selects projects on the NHS in cooperation with the MPO from the approved TIP. Given the significant resources devoted in the TIP to pavement and bridge projects, the MPO anticipates that once implemented, the TIP will contribute to progress towards achieving the statewide pavement and bridge condition performance targets. 8.A.1
Packet Pg. 590 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
29SYSTEM PERFORMANCE, FREIGHT, CONGESTION MITIGATION AND AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM MEASURES (PM3)In January 2017, USDOT published the System Performance/Freight/CMAQ Performance Measures Final Rule to establish measures to assess passenger and freight performance on the Interstate and non-Interstate National Highway System (NHS), and traffic congestion and on-road mobile source emissions in areas that do not meet federal National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). The rule, which is referred to as the PM3 rule, requires state DOTs and MPOs to establish targets for the following six performance measures:National Highway Performance Program (NHPP)1.Percent of person-miles on the Interstate system that are reliable, also referred to as Level of Travel Time Reliability (LOTTR);2.Percent of person-miles on the non-Interstate NHS that are reliable (LOTTR);National Highway Freight Program (NHFP)3.Truck Travel Time Reliability index (TTTR);Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program (CMAQ)4.Annual hours of peak hour excessive delay per capita (PHED);5.Percent of non-single occupant vehicle travel (Non-SOV); and6.Cumulative 2-year and 4-year reduction of on-road mobile source emissions (NOx, VOC, CO, PM10, and PM2.5) for CMAQ funded projects.In Florida, only the two LOTTR performance measures and the TTTR performance measure apply. Because all areas in Florida meet current NAAQS, the last three listed measures above pertaining to the CMAQ Program do not currently apply in Florida. A description of the applicable measures follows. LOTTR MeasuresThe LOTTR performance measures assesses the percent of person-miles traveled on the Interstate or the non-Interstate NHS that are reliable. LOTTR is defined as the ratio of longer travel times (80thpercentile) to a normal travel time (50thpercentile) over of all applicable roads, across four time periods between the hours of 6 a.m. and 8 p.m. each day. The measure is expressed as the percent of person-miles traveled on the Interstate or Non-Interstate NHS system that are 8.A.1
Packet Pg. 591 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
30reliable. Person-miles take into account the number of people traveling in buses, cars, and trucks over these roadway segments. TTTR MeasureThe TTTR performance measure assesses the reliability index for trucks traveling on the interstate. A TTTR ratio is generated by dividing the 95thpercentile truck travel time by a normal travel time (50thpercentile) for each segment of the Interstate system over specific time periods throughout weekdays and weekends. This is averaged across the length of all Interstate segments in the state or metropolitan planning organization (MPO) planning area to determine the TTTR index.Federal rules require state DOTs and MPOs to coordinate when setting LOTTR and TTTR performance targets and monitor progress towards achieving the targets. States must establish: Two-year and four-year statewide targets for percent of person-miles on the Interstate system that are reliable;Four-year targets for the percent of person-miles on the non-Interstate NHS that are reliable2; and Two-year and four-year targets for truck travel time reliabilityMPOs must establish four-year targets for all three measures. MPOs can either agree to program projects that will support the statewide targets,or establish theirown quantifiable targets for the MPO’s planning area. On May 18, 2018, FDOT established statewide performance targets for the system performance measures. OnNovember 9, 2018,the Collier MPO agreed to support FDOT’s statewide system performance targets, thus agreeing to plan and program projects in the TIP that once implemented, are anticipated to make progress toward achieving the statewide targets. Table 5 presents the statewide and MPO targets. Table 5 StatewideSystem Performance and Freight TargetsPerformance Measure2-year Statewide Target 4-year Statewide Target 2Beginning with the second performance period covering January 1, 2022 to December 31, 2025, two-year targets will be required in addition to four-year targets for the percent of person-miles on the non-Interstate NHS that are reliable measure. 8.A.1
Packet Pg. 592 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
31(2019)(2021)Percent of person-miles on the Interstate system that are reliable (Interstate LOTTR)75%70%Percent of person-miles on the non-Interstate NHS that are reliable (Non-Interstate NHS LOTTRNot Required550%Truck travel time reliability (TTTR)1.752.00For comparative purposes, current statewide conditions are as follows: 82 percent of person-miles traveled on the Interstate are reliable;84 percent of person-miles traveled on the non-Interstate are reliable; and1.43 truck travel time reliability index.In establishing these targets, FDOT reviewed external and internal factors that may affect reliability; analyzed travel time data from the National Performance Management Research Dataset (NPMRDS) for the years 2014 to 2017 and developed a sensitivity analysis indicating the level of risk for road segments to become unreliable. The federal travel time reliability measures follow a new methodology that differ from prior Florida efforts. In addition, beginning in 2017, the NPMRDS expanded its coverage of travel segments, and a new vendor began to supply the dataset, creating a difference in reliability performance results on non-Interstate NHS segments between pre-2017 trends and later trends. These factors create challenges for establishing a confident trend line to inform target setting for thenext two to four years. In consideration of these differences, as well as other unknowns and unfamiliarity associated with the new required processes, FDOT took a conservative approach when establishing its initialstatewide system performance and freight targets. It is the intent of FDOT to meet or exceed the established performance targets. System performance and freight are addressed through several statewide initiatives: Florida’s Strategic Intermodal System (SIS) is composed of transportation facilities of statewide and interregional significance. The SIS is a primary focus of FDOT’s capacity investments and is Florida’s primary network for ensuring a strong link between transportation and economic competitiveness. These facilities, which span all 8.A.1
Packet Pg. 593 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
32modes and includes highways, are the workhorses of Florida’s transportation system and account for a dominant share of the people and freight movement to, from and within Florida. The SIS includes 92 percent of NHS lane miles in the state. Thus, FDOT’s focus on improving performance of the SIS goes hand-in-hand with improving the NHS, which is the focus of the FHWA’s TPM program. The development of the SIS Five-Year Plan by FDOT considers scores on a range of measures including mobility, safety, preservation, and economic competitiveness as part of FDOT’s Strategic Investment Tool (SIT).In addition, FDOT’s Freight Mobility and Trade Plan (FMTP) defines policies and investments that will enhance Florida’s economicdevelopment efforts into the future. The FMTP’s Investment Element is specifically intended to identify freight needs, identify criteria for state investments in freight, and prioritize freight investments across modes. In February 2018, FHWA approved the FMTP as FDOT’s State Freight Plan.FDOT also developed and refined a methodology to identify freight bottlenecks on Florida’s SIS on an annual basis using vehicle probe data and travel time reliability measures. Identification of bottlenecks and estimation of their delay impact aids FDOT in focusing on relief efforts and ranking them by priority. In turn, this information is incorporated into FDOT’s SIT to help identify the most important SIS capacity projects to relieve congestion.TheCollier MPOTIP reflects investment priorities established in the Collier 2040 LRTP.The focus ofCollier MPO’sinvestments that address system performance and freight on the Interstate and non-Interstate NHS include:Corridor improvementsIntersection improvements (on NHS roads)o4258432 I-75 at SR951 Interchange Improvemento4452962 I-75 at Pine Ridge Rd Interchange Improvement o4464511 US 41 @ Golden Gate Parkway o4380591 US41 Resurfacing –incorporates recommendations from FDOT 2015 RSA for Airport Rd. and US 41, including improved visibility and safety at intersectionsProjects evaluated in the CMP and selected for the TIPo4464511 US 41 @ Golden Gate Parkway oSee projects listed under ITS below8.A.1
Packet Pg. 594 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
33Investments in transit, bicycle, or pedestrian systems that promote mode shifto$11.5 million on new bicycle and pedestrian facilitieso$37.2 million in transit operations and planningManaged lanesoFDOT’s Southwest Connect Interstate 75, a managed lane study on I-75from SR 951 (Collier Boulevard) in Collier County to SR 78 (Bayshore Road) in Lee County,is not shown in the TIP. [FDOT postponed the kickoff meetings scheduled for March 2020 due to the COVID-19-novel coronavirus -pandemic.]8.A.1
Packet Pg. 595 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
348.A.1
Packet Pg. 596 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
35Freight improvements (Interstate) that increase reliability (could include improved weigh stations, addressing identified truck bottlenecks on the Interstate, etc.):o$18.7 million on safety and capacity enhancements on SR 29 –will reduce congestion, crashes and resulting travel delayTSMO/ITS projectsor programs o$4.5 million on congestion management / ITS operations and improvementsIntersection Improvements Prioritized by the Congestion Management Committee following the Congestion Management Process (2017)o$1.5 million including construction of 2 new roundabouts within City of Naples and improvements at US41 and Golden Gate ParkwayTravel demand management programs, park and ride lots, etc.]oThe MPO has hired Jacobs Engineering to conduct a Park and Ride Study.See Appendix J–SUfunded projects in the UPWP.The MPO’s project prioritization process for Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities and Congestion Management includes selection criteria related to congestion-relief, reliability, andmode shift. Freight priorities are identifiedin the 2040 LRTP Cost Feasible Plan and from there, make their way into the TIP. The projects included in the TIP are consistent with FDOT's Five Year Work Program, and therefore to FDOT’s approach to prioritize funding to address performance goals and targets. Per federal planning requirements, the state selects projects on the NHS in cooperation with the MPO from the approved TIP. Given the significant resources devoted in the TIP to programs that address system performance and freight, the MPO anticipates that once implemented, the TIP will contribute to progress towards achieving the statewide reliability performance targets. 8.A.1
Packet Pg. 597 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
36TRANSIT ASSET MANAGEMENT MEASURES On July 26, 2016, FTA published the final Transit Asset Management rule. This rule applies to all recipients and subrecipients of Federal transit funding that own, operate, or manage public transportation capital assets. The rule definesthe term “state of good repair,” requires that public transportation providers develop and implement transit asset management (TAM) plans and establishes state of good repair standards and performance measures for four asset categories: equipment, rolling stock, transit infrastructure, and facilities. The rule became effective on October 1, 2018. Table6 identifies performance measures outlined in the final rule for transit asset management. Table6 FTA TAM Performance MeasuresAsset CategoryPerformance Measure1.EquipmentPercentage of non-revenue, support-service and maintenance vehicles that have met or exceeded their Useful Life Benchmark*(ULB)2.Rolling StockPercentage of revenue vehicles within a particular asset class that have either met or exceeded their Useful Life Benchmark(ULB)3.InfrastructurePercentage of track segments with performance restrictions4.FacilitiesPercentage of facilities within an asset class rated below condition 3 on the TERM scale*ULB considers a provider’s unique operating environment such as geography, service frequency, etc. and is not the same as an asset’s useful life.Public transportation agencies are required to establish and report transit asset management targets annually for the following fiscal year. Each public transit provider or its sponsors must share its targets with each MPO in which the transit provider’s projects and services are programmed in the MPO’s TIP. MPOs are required to establish initial transit asset management targets within 180 days of the date that public transportation providers establish initial targets. However, MPOs are not required to establish transit asset management targets annually each time the transit provider establishes targets. Instead, subsequent MPO targets must be established when the MPO updates or amends the TIP or LRTP. When establishing transit asset management targets, theMPO can either agree to program projects that will support the transit provider targets or establish its own separate regional transit asset management targets for the MPO planning area. MPO targets may differ from agency targets, especially if there are multiple transit agencies in the MPO planning area.8.A.1
Packet Pg. 598 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
37The TAM rule defines two tiers of public transportation providers based on size parameters. Tier I providers are those that operate rail service or more than 100 vehicles in all fixed route modes, or more than 100 vehicles or more in one non-fixed route mode. Tier II providers are those that are a subrecipient of FTA 5311funds, or an American Indian Tribe, or have 100 or less vehicles across all fixed route modes or have 100 vehicles or less in one non-fixed route mode. A Tier I provider must establish its own transit asset management targets, as well as report performance and other data to FTA. A Tier II provider has the option to establish its own targets or to participate in a group plan with other Tier II providers whereby targets are established by a plan sponsor, typically a state DOT, for the entire group.A totalof 28 transit providers participated in the FDOT Group TAM Plan (Table 6.2). The participants in the FDOT Group TAM Plan are comprised of the Section 5311 Rural Program and open-door Section 5310 Enhanced Mobility of Seniors & Individuals with Disabilities FDOT subrecipients. The Group TAM Plan was adopted in October 2018 and covers fiscal years 2018-2019 through 2021-2022.Within the Collier MPO there are no agencies that participate in the FDOT Group TAM Plan. Collier Area Transit (CAT), a Tier II provider,is the only transit provider within the MPO region. CAT does not participate in the FDOT Group TAM Plan as it has too few busses to meet the criteria.On November 9, 2018, the Collier MPOagreed to support the Collier County Board of County Commissioners (BCC) / Collier Area Transit (CAT)transit asset management targetswhich were adopted on October 23, 2018, thus agreeing to plan and program projects in the TIP that once implemented, are anticipated to make progress toward achieving the transit provider targets. Table 7displays the TAM performance measures targetsfor FDOTand the current conditions within the Collier MPO.The transit asset management targets are based on the condition of existing transit assets and planned investments in equipment, rolling stock, infrastructure, and facilities. The targets reflect the most recent data available on the number, age, and condition of transit assets, and expectations and capital investment plans for improving these assets. Table 7 summarizes both existing conditions for the most recent year available, and the targets.8.A.1
Packet Pg. 599 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
38Table 7–TAM Performance MeasuresAsset CategoryFDOT and MPO Transit TargetsCurrent Conditions within Collier MPOMet or Exceed TargetEquipment10% have met or exceeded their Useful Like Benchmark (ULB)0% exceed ULBYesRolling Stock10% have met or exceeded their ULB50% exceed ULBNoInfrastructuren/an/an/aFacilities25% of facilities less than 3.0 on the TERM scale0% at or above 3.0 TERMYesTransit Asset Management in the TIPTheCollier MPOTIP was developed and is managed in cooperation with CAT.CAT submits a list of Transit Priority Projects to the MPO Board for approval on an annual basis. The priority projects reflect the investment priorities established in the 2040 LRTPwhich incorporates the Transit Development Plan as its transit element. FTA funding, as programmed by the region’s transit providers and FDOT, is used for programs and products to improve the condition of the region’s transit assets. See Appendix I –Criteria Used for Project PrioritizationThe 2019 list of Transit Project Priorities did not include asset management related projects. However, the MPO Board directed staff in December 2019 to use available SU funds to purchase a replacement bus for $500,000; in addition to fundinga project to enhance accessibility at 10 bus stops to meet ADA requirements for $250,000 in FY 2020. The MPO will update transit project priority criteriain calendar year 2020to include state of goodrepaircriteria.TRANSIT SAFETY PERFORMANCE The Federal Transit Administration (FTA) established transit safety performance management requirements in the Public Transportation Agency Safety Plan (PTASP) final rule, which was published on July 19, 2018. This rule requires providers 8.A.1
Packet Pg. 600 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
39of public transportation systems that receive federal financial assistance under 49 U.S.C. Chapter 53 to develop and implement a PTASP based on a Safety Management Systems approach. The PTASP must include performance targets for the performance measures established by FTA in the National Public Transportation Safety Plan, which was published on January 28, 2017. The transit safety performance measures are:Total number of reportable fatalities and rate per total vehicle revenue miles by mode.Total number of reportable injuries and rate per total vehicle revenue miles by mode.Total number of reportable safety events and rate per total vehicle revenue miles by mode.System reliability –mean distance between major mechanical failures by mode.The PTASP rule takes effect on July 19, 2019. Each provider of public transportation that is subject to the rule must certify it has a PTASP, including transit safety targets for the above measures, in place no later than July 20, 2020. MPOs then have 180 days to establish transit safety targets for the MPO planning area. Once the public transportation provider establishes targets, it must make the targets available to MPOs to aid in the planning process. The Collier MPO must reflect those targets in any LRTP and TIP updated on or after July 20, 2021. Over the course of 2019-2021, the Collier MPO will coordinate with public transportation providers in the planning area on the development and establishment of transit safety targets. Future TIPs will include a discussion of the anticipated effect towards achieving the transit safety targets. 8.A.1
Packet Pg. 601 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
402019MPO PROJECT PRIORITY AND PROJECT SELECTION PROCESSESThe method to select projects for inclusion in the TIP depends on whether the metropolitan area has a population of 200,000orgreater.Metropolitanareaswithpopulationsgreaterthan200,000arecalledTransportationManagementAreas (TMA). The Collier MPO is a TMA. In a TMA, the MPO selects many of the Title 23 and FTA funded projects for implementationinconsultationwithFDOTandlocaltransitoperators.ProjectsontheNationalHighwaySystem(NHS)and projects funded under the bridge maintenance and interstate maintenance programs are selected byFDOT in cooperation with the MPO. Federal Lands Highway Program projects are selected by the respective federal agency in cooperation with FDOT and the MPO [23 C.F.R. 450.330(c)]. FDOT coordinates with the MPO to ensure that projects are also consistent with MPOpriorities.Federal and State transportation programs help the Collier MPO complete transportation projects which are divided into several categories including: highway (including maintenance), transit, sidewalk/bicycle paths and/or facilities, congestion management,bridges,planning,andaviation.Manyoftheseprojectsrequiremultiplephaseswhichmustbecompletedin order. Project phases may include: Project Development & Environment studies (PD&E), Preliminary Engineering (PE), Right-of-Way acquisition (ROW), Railroads and Utilities (RRU) and Construction (CST). Some phases may require multi-year efforts to complete, therefore it is often necessary to prioritize only one or two phases of a project within a TIP withthe next phase(s) being included in subsequentTIPs.All projects in this TIP must be consistent with the Collier MPO 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) adopted on December11,2015.ProjectswereincludedintheLRTPbasedontheirpotentialtoimprovethesafetyand/orperformance ofafacility;increasecapacityorrelievecongestion;andpreserveexistingtransportationinvestments.TIPprojectsarealso consistent,totheextentfeasible,withtheCapitalImprovementProgramsandComprehensivePlansofCollierCounty,the CityofNaples,theCityofMarcoIsland,andtheCityofEvergladesaswellastheMasterPlansoftheCollierCountyAirport Authority and the Naples Airport Authority. With minor exceptions, projects in the TIP must also be included in the FDOT Five-Year Work Program (WP) and the State Transportation Improvement Program(STIP).The MPO’s 2019Transportation Project Priorities, for inclusion in the FY2021–FY2025TIP, were adopted by the MPO Board on June 14, 2019.The MPO and FDOT annually update the TIP, FDOT Work Program (WP) and STIP by adding a “new fifth year” which maintains the programs as rolling five-year programs. FDOT coordinates this process with the MPO to ensure that projects are consistent with MPO priorities.During each spring/summer, the MPO prioritizes projects derived from its adopted LRTP and based on the MPO’s annual allocation of Federal Surface Transportation Block Group Program (STBGP) funds, State Transportation Trust Funds and other funding programs. The MPO’s list of prioritized 8.A.1
Packet Pg. 602 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
41projects is formally reviewed by the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC), Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC), Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC), and Congestion Management Committee (CMC), and is approved by the MPO Board before being transmitted to FDOT for funding consideration. (SeeAppendix I for a description of the criteria used for project prioritization.) The list of prioritized projects includes highway, sidewalk/bicycle paths and/or facilities,congestion management, bridge and transit projects which are illustrated on the following pages. All projects funded through the FDOT Work Program are included in Part I of this TIP. Table 1 shows the general timeframe for the MPO’s establishment of project priorities and the development of the FY2021–FY2025TIP.Safety has always been an important part of the MPO’s project prioritization process. Safety criteria are included in the prioritizationprocessforbicycleandpedestrian,congestionmanagementandbridgepriorities.HighwayandSISpriorities aregeneratedbytheLongRangeTransportationPlanwhichemphasizessafety.AstheMPOdevelopsnewlistsofproject priorities,thenewfederalperformancemeasureswillbeincorporatedintothecriteria. Table 1 –General Timeframe for FY2021-2025TIP ProcessJan -March 2019MPO solicits candidate projects for potential funding in FY2021-FY2025TIP.June 2019MPO adopts prioritized list of projects for funding in the MPO FY2021-25TIPNov 2019–Jan 2020FDOT releases Tentative Five-year Work Program for FY2021-FY2025March –June 2020MPO produces draft FY2021-2025TIP; MPO Board and committees review draftTIP; MPO advisory committees endorseTIPJune 2020MPO adopts FY2021–FY2025TIP which is derived from FDOT’s Tentative Five-year WorkProgram.MPO adopts prioritized list of projects for funding in the FY2022-FY2026TIPJuly 2020FDOT’s Five-Year Work Program FY2021-FY2025(which includes the MPO TIP) is adopted and goes into effect.September 2020MPO adopts TIP Amendment for inclusion of Roll Forward Report8.A.1
Packet Pg. 603 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
422019HIGHWAY PRIORITIESHighway priorities are consistent with the 2040 LRTP Cost Feasible Plan. The Corkscrew Road safety project was addedin 2019to address two segments of the roadway that have a high number of crashes. Otherwise the 2019 priorities remain the same as the 2018 priorities. TheMPO Board approved the highwayprioritieslist,shown on Table 2,onJune 14, 2019. MPO staff forwarded the list to FDOT for consideration of future funding.8.A.1
Packet Pg. 604 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
43Table 2 –2019 Highway Priorities8.A.1
Packet Pg. 605 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
44SIS PRIORITIES (for Collier and Lee County MPOs)Inadditiontothehighwayprioritieslistedabove,theMPOforwardstwolistsofpriority projectsontheStrategicIntermodalSystem (SIS)networktoFDOTforconsiderationoffuturefunding.TheSISnetworkincludeshighways,airports,spaceports,deep water seaports, freight rail terminals, passenger rail, intercity bus terminals, rail corridors and waterways that are considered the largest and most significant commercial transportation facilities in thestate.There are three SIS highway corridors in Collier County: I-75, SR29 and SR82are the three SIS highway corridors in Collier County.. Table 3A and Table 3B illustrate the 2018 SIS Priorities for both the Collier MPO (adopted by the MPO Board on June 8, 2018) and the Lee County MPO Board. The Collier MPO SIS Priorities are consistent with the Collier 2040LRTP.8.A.1
Packet Pg. 606 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
45Table 3A Joint Collier/Lee County MPO Mainline SIS Priorities Adopted by Collier MPO June 8, 2018,Lee County MPO June 22, 20182012Priority2017PriorityProjectFromToImprovement TypeNext PhaseVolumeCapacity2011SR 82Hendry County LineGator Slough2-4LCST1022SR 29 Loop RdSR 29 (South)SR 29 (North)New 4LROWNew23SR 29New Market Road NorthSR 822-4LROW1.00NAI-75Pine Ridge RoadSR 826L-8 Aux LnsPD&E0.90SR 80SR 31Buckingham Rd4-6LPD&E0.8424SR 299th St NorthImmokalee Dr2-4LPE0.8212SR 29Immokalee DrNew Market Rd North2-4LROW0.81NA83SR 31SR 80SR 782-4LPD&E0.6326SR 29Oil Well RdSouth of Agricultural Way2-4LPE5,0008,4000.592510SR 29South of Agricultural WayCR 846 East2-4LROW7,1000.432611SR 29I 75Oil Well Rd2-4LPE3,2008,4000.381312I 75Pine Ridge RdSR 806-10LPD&E0.90Notes1. Joint Board #1 PriorityPhase Abbreviations:CST construction;ROW right-of-way;PD&E project development andenvironmental; PE preliminary engineering8.A.1
Packet Pg. 607 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
46Table 3B Joint Collier/Lee County MPO Interchange SIS Priorities Adopted by Collier MPO June 8, 2018,Lee County MPO June 22, 2018ProjectInterchangeImprovement TypeNextPhaseI 75@ Everglades BlvdNew InterchangeIJRI 75@ Golden Gate PkwyMinor Interchange ImprovementsStudyShort TermI 75@ Pine Ridge RdMinor interchange improvementsStudyShort TermI 75@Immokalee RdMajor interchange improvementsPD&EShort TermI 75@ Bonita Beach RdMajor interchange improvementsPEMid TermI 75@ Corkscrew RdMajor interchange improvementsPEShort TermI 75@ Daniels PkwyMinor Interchange ImprovementsStudyShort TermI 75@ SR 82Major interchange improvementsPELong TermI 75@Luckett RdMajor interchange improvementsPELong TermI 75@ SR 78Minor interchange improvementsPEShort TermI 75@ Del Prado Ext.New InterchangeIJR8.A.1
Packet Pg. 608 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
472019BRIDGE PRIORITIESBridgerelatedprioritiesareconsistentwiththe2040LRTP.The2019BridgeRelatedPriorities(Table4)wereapprovedby the MPO Board on June 14, 2019and forwarded to FDOT for consideration of future funding. Table 4 –2019Bridge Priorities8.A.1
Packet Pg. 609 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
482019TRANSIT PRIORITIESFloridaStateStatutesrequireeachtransitproviderinFloridathatreceivesStateTransitBlockGrantfundingtopreparean annual Transit Development Plan (TDP). The TDP is a ten-year plan for Collier Area Transit (CAT) that provides a review of existing transportation services and a trend analysis of these services. Table 5 shows the 2019Transit Priorities which wereapprovedbytheMPOBoardonJune 14, 2019andsubmittedtoFDOTforconsiderationoffuturefunding.Table 5 -Transit Priorities 20198.A.1
Packet Pg. 610 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
492019CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PRIORITIESTransportation Management Areas (urbanized areas with populations over 200,000) are required by 23 C.F.R. 450.322to have a Congestion Management Process (CMP) that provides for the effective and systematic management and operation of new and existing facilities by using travel demand reductions and operational management strategies.The Collier MPO CMP may be viewed by clicking 2017 Collier CMP.CMP projects that areeligibleforFederalandstate funding include sidewalk/bicycle paths and/or facilities and congestion management projects that alleviate congestion, do not require the acquisition of right-of-way and demonstrate quantifiable performancemeasures.The MPO allocates its SU funds3on a five-year rotating basis. In 2019, congestion management received 100% of the SU funds, approximately $4.1 million.The 2019congestion management priorities are all new projects as prior priority projects have been completed or removed from the priority list.Table 6 (next page) lists the 2019 congestion management prioritieswhich were adopted by the MPO Board in June 2019 and subsequently modified and re-adopted by the Board on October 11, 2019. The Congestion Management Process (2017 update) was used by the committee as a guide toprioritizethe 2019projects.3Surface Transportation Funds for Urbanized Area –with population greater than 200,000. Allocation of funds is determined by a formula. 8.A.1
Packet Pg. 611 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
50Table 6 –2019 Congestion Management Priorities8.A.1
Packet Pg. 612 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
51BICYCLE and PEDESTRIAN PRIORITIESTwo changeswere made to the 2018Bicycle and Pedestrian Project Priorities; #6 Pine Ridge Road sidewalk was deleted at the County’s request as it is being incorporated into a larger project; and #14 Immokalee RoadShared Use Pathwas deleted upon recommendation of the Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee along with County concurrence.The 11 remaining projects represent the 2019Bicycle and Pedestrian priorities, all of which are funded for construction in the current TIP.The MPO Board adoptedthe list on June 14, 2019 which was then sent to FDOT for consideration offunding. The priorities were derived from the 2012 Collier MPO Comprehensive Pathways Plan. Future Bicycle and Pedestrian Priorities will be derived from the Collier MPO Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan which replaced the 2012 Planin March 2019. The two plans share a similar vision of providing a safe, connected and convenient on-road and off-road network throughout the Collier MPA to accommodate bicyclists and pedestrians as well as a similar goal of improving transportation efficiency and enhancing the health and fitness of the community while allowing for more transportation choices. 8.A.1
Packet Pg. 613 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
52Table 7 –2019Bicycle and Pedestrian Priorities(2018 list updated to FDOT Tentative Work Program Fiscal Years 2021-2025)8.A.1
Packet Pg. 614 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
53REGIONALPRIORITIES–TRANSPORTATIONREGIONALINCENTIVEPROGRAM(TRIP)In addition to local MPO priorities, the Collier MPO coordinates with the Lee County MPO to set regional priorities.The Lee County and Collier MPOs entered into an Interlocal Agreement by which they set policies to prioritize regional projects.TheTransportation Regional Incentive Program (TRIP).TRIP is a discretionary programthat fundsregional projects prioritized by the two MPOs. The TRIP prioritiesapproved by the MPO Board on June 14, 2019,are shown in Table 8..8.A.1
Packet Pg. 615 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
54Table 8-2019Joint Collier/Lee County MPO TRIP Priorities 8.A.1
Packet Pg. 616 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
55Major Projects Implemented or Delayed from the Previous TIP (FY2019 –FY2023)23 CFR §450.324(2) requires MPOs to list major projects from the previous TIP that were implemented and to identify any significant delays in the planned implementation of major projects. The Collier MPO TIP identifies major projects as a multi-laning or a new facility type capacity improvement. The following list provides the status of the major projects that were identified as such in the FY2020–FY20241TIP.Major Projects Implemented/CompletedSR82 from Gator Slough Laneto SR29.Construction completed to widen road from two to four lanes.(FPN 4308491)Marco Island Airport –Construction completed on new terminal building (FPN 4370631).Major Projects Significantly Delayed, Reason for Delay and Revised Schedule The cause of the delayswas budgetary according to FDOT.SR82 from Hendry County Line to Gator Slough.Add lanes and reconstruction. Construction($41million)phase moved from FY2023toFY2024(FPN 4308481).I-75 @ SR951; Major interchange improvement; construction ($89 million) movedfrom FY2024toFY2025(FPN 4258432).SR29 from SR82 to Hendry County Line. Add lanes and reconstruction. Construction phase ($10 million) moved out of Work Program.(FPN 4178784)Major Projects in the FY2021–FY2025TIPThe Collier MPO TIP identifies major projects as a multi-laning or a new facility type capacity improvement.The following list provides the status of the major projects in the FY2021–FY2025TIP.Multi-Laning or New Facility Capacity Improvement ProjectsI-75@SR951;FPN4258432;Majorinterchangeimprovement;$98millionCST,ENV,PE,ROW,RRU.$89million of project inFY24.SR29Projects(SixprojectsthatcoverSR29initsentiretybetweenOilWellRdandtheHendryCountyLine)•FPN4175402AddlanesandreconstructionfromOilWellRoadtoSunnilandNurseryRd;PEprogrammed in FY2024 for $8.3million8.A.1
Packet Pg. 617 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
56•FPN4175403AddlanesandreconstructionfromSunnilandNurseryRdtoSofAgricultureWay; ENV programmed in FY2023 for $0.5million•FPN4175404AddlanesandreconstructionfromSofAgriculturalWaytoCR846(ImmokaleeRd); ENV programmed in FY2023 for $0.3millionSR82 from Gator Slough to SR 29;FPN 4175405 Add lanes and reconstruction from CR846 to New Market Rd.; ENV, ROW programmed in FY24 and FY25 for $6.7 million.4175406 Widen from twoto fourlanes; ROW programmed in FY25for $1.1 millionFPN 4178784 Add lanes and reconstruction from SR82 to Hendry County Line; ROW programmed in FY21 for $1.3 million.SR 82Projects•FPN4308481AddlanesandreconstructionfromHendryCountyLinetoGatorSloughLane;ENV, ROW, RRU, CST with CST programmed in FY2024for $41millionSR 951Projects•FPN 4351112 Add lanes and rehabilitate pavement from Manatee Rd to N of Tower Rd; ROW. CST with construction($13 million) programmedin FY24•See FPN 4258432 under Capacity EnhancementsAirportPullingRoad–FPN4404411AddthrulanesfromVanderbilt(Beach)RoadtoImmokaleeRoad;$13 million PE and CST with CST programmed in FY2023 for $10million16thSt Bridge NE from Golden Gate Boulevard to Randall Boulevard –FPN 4318953 New bridge constructionprogrammed in FY22 for $5million8.A.1
Packet Pg. 618 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
57PUBLIC INVOLVEMENTThe MPO adopted a new Public Participation Plan (PPP) in February 2019. The PPP follows Federal regulations for TIP related public involvement [23 C.F.R. 450.326(b)] and [23 U.S.C. 134 (i)(6) and (7) providing adequate public notice of public participation activities and time for public review and comment at key decision points.Typically, the TIP and all amendments to the TIP, are presented at multiple meetings of the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC), Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC) and MPO Board; the public may attend and comment at all MPO meetings. However, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the MPO is using emailand website outreach to interested parties instead of holding advisory committee meetings; and investigating holding a virtual or call-in meeting for the MPO Board to adopt the TIP. Public comments for the FY2021 –FY2025 TIP may be found in Appendix G.TIP AMENDMENTSOccasionally amendments need to be made to the TIP. There are three types of amendments. The first type, Administrative Modification, is used for minor cost changes in a project/project phase, minor changes to funding sources, minorchangestotheinitiationofanyprojectphase,andcorrectionofscrivenererrors.AdministrativeModificationsdonot needMPOBoardapprovalandmaybeauthorizedbytheMPO’sExecutiveDirector.Thesecondtypeofamendment–aRollForwardAmendment–isusedtoaddprojectstotheTIPthatwerenotaddedprior toJune30thbutwereaddedtotheFDOTWorkProgrambetweenJuly1standSeptember30th.RollForwardAmendments areregularlyneededlargelyduetothedifferentstateandfederalfiscalyears.ManyoftheprojectsthatgetrolledforwardareFTAprojectsbecausetheseprojectsdonotautomaticallyrollforwardintheTIP.RollForwardAmendmentsdo not have any fiscal impact on theTIP.A TIP Amendment is the third and most substantive type of amendment. These amendments are required when a project is added or deleted (excluding those projects added between July 1 and September 30), a project impacts the fiscal constraint of the TIP, project phase initiation dates, or if there is a substantive change in the scope of a project. TIP AmendmentsrequireMPOBoardapproval,arepostedontheMPOwebsitealongwithcommentsformsanddistributedto listserv(s) via email. The Collier MPO’s PPP defines the process to be followed for TIPamendments.CERTIFICATIONThe entire MPO process, including the TIP, must be certified by FDOT on an annual basis. The 2019MPO process was 8.A.1
Packet Pg. 619 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
58certified by FDOT on June 8, 2018. The 2019MPO certification process has begun and is expected to be complete before adoption of this TIP.In addition, every four years the MPO must also be certified by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and the Federal Transit Administration (FTA). The MPO’s transportation planning process was jointly certified byFHWA and FTA on December 28, 2016. The next FHWA / FTA joint certification will begin with a site visit scheduled for August12,2020.PROJECT ORGANIZATIONProjects are listed in nine different categories. Within each category projects are listed in numerical order using the FPN (Financial Project Number) which is in the upper left corner of each project page. Several of the roads are listed by their county or state road designation. The table below lists these designations along with the commonly used name.Common NameName in TIPVanderbilt DriveCR 901Vanderbilt Beach RoadCR 862San Marco RoadCR 92US 41/Tamiami TrailSR 90 SR 45Collier BoulevardSR 9518.A.1
Packet Pg. 620 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
59EXPLANATION OF PROJECT COSTSPart I of the TIP contains all projects that are listed in the FY2020 –FY2024 TIP. The projects are divided into five categories:highways(includingbridges,congestionmanagement,bicycleandpedestrian,andmaintenance),transportation planning, transit, transportation disadvantaged and aviation. Each project is illustrated on a separate project page. Future costs are presented in Year of Expenditure Dollars (YOE), which takes inflation into account. The inflation factors were developed by the State. Current and prior year costs are reflected in nominaldollars.Projectsoftenrequiremultiplephaseswhichmayincludeanyorallofthefollowing:ProjectDevelopmentandEnvironment (PD&E), Design (PE), Environment (ENV), Right of Way acquisition (ROW), Railroad and Utilities (RRU), Construction (CST),Operations(OPS),Capital(CAP).Largeprojectsaresometimesconstructedinsmallersegmentsandmaybeshown in multiple TIPs. When this happens, the project description (Letter D) will indicate that the current project is a segment/ phaseofalargerproject.AnexampleprojectsheetisshownonthenextpageasFigure5.A–Federal Project Number (FPN) B –Location of projectC–Denotes is project is on the SIS system D –Project descriptionE–Prior, Future, and Total Project Cost; LRTP and TIP References (if needed) F –FDOT Work SummaryG–Lead agency for projectH–Project length, if applicableI–Project Phase, Fund Code Source and Funding Amounts by Year, by Phase, by Fund Source J –Map of project area8.A.1
Packet Pg. 621 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
608.A.1
Packet Pg. 622 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 623 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 624 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 625 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 626 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 627 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 628 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 629 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 630 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 631 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 632 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 633 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 634 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 635 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 636 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 637 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 638 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 639 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 640 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 641 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 642 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 643 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 644 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 645 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 646 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 647 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 648 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 649 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 650 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 651 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 652 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 653 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 654 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 655 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 656 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 657 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 658 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 659 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 660 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 661 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 662 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 663 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 664 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 665 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 666 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 667 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 668 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 669 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 670 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 671 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 672 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 673 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 674 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 675 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 676 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 677 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 678 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 679 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 680 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 681 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 682 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 683 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 684 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 685 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 686 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 687 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 688 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 689 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 690 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 691 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 692 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 693 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 694 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 695 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 696 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 697 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 698 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 699 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 700 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 701 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 702 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 703 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 704 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 705 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 706 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 707 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 708 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 709 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
PART 1 SECTIONTRANSPORTATIONDISADVANTAGED PROJECTS 8.A.1
Packet Pg. 710 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
This section includes the Transportation Disadvantaged program projects in FY2020/21FY2024/25. The Community Transportation Coordinator (CTC) for the Transportation Disadvantaged program in Collier County is the Collier County Board of County Commissioners which provide services under a memorandum of agreement with the Florida Commission for the Transportation Disadvantaged. The Collier MPO, as the designated official planning agency for the program (DOPA) confirms that projects programmed through FY 2024/25are all consistent withthe Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) major update which was adopted by the Collier Local Coordinating Board (LCB) on October 24, 2018. The two Transportation Disadvantaged program projects are listed below. 20/21was not yet available when this TIP was adopted. The amounts listed below are from FY2019/20and will be adjusted accordingly via an Administrative Modification to the TIP once they become available.Collier MPO LCB AssistanceThe FY2019/20Planning Grant Allocations for the Transportation DisadvantagedTrust Fund was $27,016. This grant allocation is used by the Collier MPO to support the LCB.Collier County FY 2019/20TDTF / Trip and Equipment GrantThe TDTF and Trip and Equipment Grantarefunded by the Florida Commission for the Transportation Disadvantaged. The estimated amount of the grant is $910,405. Thesefunds are used to cover a portion of the operating expenses for the Collier Area ParaTransit Program8.A.1
Packet Pg. 711 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 712 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 713 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 714 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 715 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 716 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 717 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 718 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 719 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 720 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
PART II COLLIER COUNTY PROJECTS The projects included in this section of the TIP are generally located outside of the Cities of Marco Island and Naples. The projects arefunded through a variety of funding sources including local gas taxes, road impact fees, state and federal grants, and developercommitments. Priorities are established by the Collier County Board of County Commissioners based upon an analysis of existing conditions andproject needs. Some reconstruction and resurfacing projects may have been initially requested by citizens. Other projects are part of the overall maintenance and improvement program, utilizing various funds, with priorities established through careful and continuous monitoring of conditions. The five-year schedule of Capital Improvement Projects approved by the Board of County Commissioners is shown of the next two pages. All improvements are consistent with the Collier County Comprehensive Plan and Collier County Growth Management Plan. 8.A.1
Packet Pg. 721 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
Project UPDATE
Name TO SAP
Project FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY 20-24
#SUMMARY OF PROJECTS Amount Amount Amount Amount Amount Amount Amount
60168 Vanderbilt Beach Rd/Collier Blvd-16th 27,154 R/M/D/A 15,000 R/A 75,000 C 90,000
60201 Pine Ridge Rd (Livingston to I75)1,000 A 30,000 D/C/M 30,000
66066 11 Bridge Replacements 1,075 M 31,865 C 32,940
60147 Randall/Immokalee Road Intersection 221 D 950 D/R 8,800 C 9,750
60190 Airport Rd Vanderbilt Bch Rd to Immokalee Rd 64 3,000 D/R 14,500 C 17,500
60215 Triangle Blvd/Price St 200 R 6,000 R/C 6,000
60212 New Golden Gate Bridges (11)15,476 D/C 6,120 D/C 18,000 D/C 39,596
60212.1 47th Ave NE 9,000 D/C 9,000
TBD 16th Street NE Bridge 9,030 D/C 9,030
60228 Sidewalks 1,627 D/C 1,311 D/C 1,997 D/C 2,530 D/C 2,535 D/C 10,000
60145 Golden Gate Blvd 20th St to Everglades 21,935 R/D/C -
60211 Orange Blossom (Airport to Livingston)200 S ----
60198 Veterans Memorial 400 R 3,600 R,D 8,800 C --12,400
60199 Vanderbilt Beach Rd (US41 to E of Goodlette)800 D 500 D/R 8,900 C 9,400
60200 Goodland Road (CR 92A) Roadway Improvements 1,400 D/M 2,000 A 4,100 C 6,100
60219 Whippoorwill 300 4,000 D/C 4,000
60129 Wilson Benfield Ext (Lord's Way to City Gate N)3,487 S/C 7,000 C 1,000 R/A 1,000 R/A 1,000 R/A 1,000 R/A 11,000
65061 Ruston Pointe 140 C 150 C 150
60144 Oil Well (Everglades to Oil Well Grade)5,832 608 A 300 A 300 A 300 A 300 A 1,808
33524 Tiger Grant 2,852 685 685
70167 Business Center (City Gate)8,000 C 8,000
68057 Collier Blvd (Green to GG Main Canal)3,200 D/A 7,000 R/A 4,900 A 15,100
60065 Randall Blvd/Immk to Oil Well 232 1,500 A 1,500
60232 Belle Meade 30 30
TBD Goodlette Rd (VBR to Immokalee Rd)2,000 R/A 5,500 D/R/M/A 6,750 A 14,250
TBD Green Blvd (Santa Barbara Blvd to Sunshine)500 S 500
60229 Wilson Blvd (GG Blvd to Immokalee)2,000 A 10,000 D/A 10,000 C 22,000
TBD Vanderbilt Bch Rd (16th to Everglades)2,800 D/R/M 11,250 R/A 5,000 R/A 19,050
TBD Massey St 845 D/R 845
TBD Immokalee Rd (Livingston to Logan)1,000 S/A 1,000
60016 Intersections Improvements Shoulder Widening 2,112 -375 300 300 550 1,525
33524 Pine Ridge Rd Turning Ln 1,590 -
60148 Airport Rd-Davis Blvd Intersection 2,148 DC -
60214 Immokalee/Woodcrest Imp 1,000 DC -
60225 White Blvd (Collier to 23rd St S.W.) Shoulders 175 D -
60226 16th Ave (13th St SW to 23rd St SW) Shoulders 150 D 1,350 C 1,500
60227 Corkscrew Rd (Lee County Line) Shoulders 1,200 C 1,200
60231 Oil Well Rd (Camp Keais Rd to SR 29) Shoulders 900 D/C 900
60230 Randall and 8th-8th St Bridge Opening Impacts 100 D 900 C 900
60213 St Andrews Safety 534 DC -
60132 Immk//CR951 Broken Back Intersection 1,109 DC -
60192 Lake Trafford @ 19th St 2 DC -
TBD Randall Blvd (Immk Rd to Desoto Blvd)Shoulder 100 DC 1,450 C 1,550
60233 Corkscrew Rd (Lee Cnty Line to SR82 Curve)1,400 C -
TBD Randall Blvd at Everglades Blvd 625 DC350C 975
TBD Immk Rd at Northbrooke Dr/Tarpon Bay Blvd 1,000 DC 1,000
TBD Everglades Blvd (Oil Well to Immk Rd)Shoulder 1,600 DC 1,600
Several LAPS 130 -
61001 Tree Farm/Woodcrest 1,034 -
60040 Golden Gate Blvd-Wilson to 20th 423 -
68056 Collier Blvd (GGB to Green)339 -
50154 Hurricane IRMA 545 -
60208 Immokalee Rd Beautification 3 -
Contingency -
Total 78,861 51,375 151,406 71,973 67,045 50,985 392,784
Operations Improvements/Programs -
66066 Bridge Repairs/Improvements 10,814 2,500 2,500 6,500 6,500 6,000 24,000
60130 Wall/Barrier Replacement 793 500 250 250 250 250 1,500
60131 Road Resurfacing 111/101 5,637 6,800 6,500 6,000 6,000 11,500 36,800
60128 Limerock Road Conversion 111 1,017 100 100
60077 Striping and Marking 985 800 800 800 800 950 4,150
60172 Traffic Ops Upgrades/Enhancements 2,029 400 700 700 700 700 3,200
60189 LED Replacement Program 1,110 350 350
60183 Sign Retroreflectivity Requirement 27 -
60118 Countywide Pathways/Sidewalks Non PIL /LAP 1,865 250 350 300 750 750 2,400
69081 Pathways/Sidewalks Bike Lanes Maint/Enhan 24 -
60037 Asset Mgmt 523 450 100 100 100 100 850
60146 TMC Relocation Fund 310 1,122 --
60197 RM Facility Fund 310 750 500 500 500 500 500 2,500
69331-339 District 1,2,3,4,5,6 Sidewalk PIL 402 -
60191 Lap Design Phase 112 -
Subtotal Operations Improvements/Programs 27,210 12,650 11,700 15,150 15,600 20,750 75,850
60066 Congestion Mgmt Fare 918 -
60085 TIS Review 365 250 S 250 S 250 S 250 S 250 S 1,250
60088 PUD Monitoring 165 -
60109 Planning Consulting 443 500 S 500 S 500 S 500 S 500 S 2,500
60163 Traffic Studies 635 300 300 300 300 300 1,500
60171 Multi Project 80 -
Advance/Repay to 325 STW 14,450 -
Impact Fee Refunds 1,370 250 250 250 250 250 1,250
Debt Service Payments 13,326 13,262 13,134 13,131 13,136 13,576 66,239
-
Total Funding Request All Funds 137,823 78,587 177,540 101,554 97,081 86,611 541,373
REVENUES
Sales Tax 9,127 86,407 26,973 31,650 29,535 183,692
Impact Fees Revenue 18,130 15,000 15,500 15,500 15,500 15,500 77,000
COA Revenue -
Gas Tax Revenue 22,975 23,000 24,000 24,000 24,000 24,000 119,000
Grants/Reimbursements*1,895 1,500 4,934 4,928 11,362
DCA/Interlocal 62014 1,000 1,000
Transfer 001 to 310 8,556 9,389 9,556 9,556 9,556 9,556 47,613
Transfer 111 to 310 4,250 4,000 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 18,000
Interest Gas Tax-Impact Fees 500 1,381 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 5,381
Carry Forward 313-310-Impact Fees 129,093 47,576 47,576
Potential Debt Funding/Unfunded Needs 26,000 723 5,545 32,268
Expected FEMA Reimbursement 8,500 8,500
Revenue Reserve 5%(1,919)(2,025)(2,025)(2,025)(2,025)(10,019)
Total 5 Year Revenues 185,399 110,054 177,372 83,432 83,904 86,611 541,373
Gross Surplus/Shortfall 47,576 31,467 (168)(18,122)(13,177)--
Key:
A = Adv Construction / S = Study / D = Design FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024
M = Mitigation / C = Construction / R = ROW 16th St Bridge 4,934
LS = Landscape / L = Litigation / I = Inspection Airport VBR to Immk 1,500 4,928
AM = Access Mgmt / LP = SIB Loan Repayment 1,500 4,934 4,928 0 0
@ = See separate supplemental maps
**The 5-cent Local Option Fuel Tax is earmarked towards debt service, bridges, and intersection improvements.
Sales Tax Projects:FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY 25
60168 Vanderbilt Beach Ext 74,000
60201 Pine Ridge Rd (Livingston Intersection Imp)23,000
66066 11 Bridge Replacements 7,000
60147 Immk/Randall Rd Intersection 7,000
TBD Airport Rd VBR to Immk Rd 1,500 2,500
60215 Triangle Blvd/Price St 6,000
60212 New Golden Gate Bridges (11) 15,476 6,120 18,000 7,308
47th Street Bridge 9,000
TBD 16th Street Bridge 4,096
TBD Sidewalks 1,627 1,311 1,997 2,530 2,535
Total 9,127 86,407 26,973 31,650 29,535 7,308
Attachment D
2020 5 Year Work Program
(Dollars shown in Thousands)
Project
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 722 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
PART IIICITY OF NAPLES PROJECTSTheprojectsincludedinthissectionoftheTIParelocatedinsidetheCityofNaples.Theprojectsarefundedthroughavarietyoffundingsources including local gas taxes, road impact fees, state and federal grants, and developer commitments. Priorities are established by the Naples City Council based upon an analysis of existing conditions and project needs. Some reconstruction and resurfacing projects may have been initially requested by citizens. Other projects are part of the overall maintenance and improvement program, utilizing various funds, with priorities established through careful and continuous monitoring of conditions. -FY2020 Budget and show the FY2020-FY2024 capital improvement programs for Streets (Fund 190) and the Community Redevelopment Agency (Fund 180). Note that the amount for FY20 is a requested amount; the City will adopt its FY2020-FY2021 budget after the adoption of this TIP.8.A.1
Packet Pg. 723 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - FUND 180
CIP PROJECT Requested
NUMBER DESCRIPTION 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24
19C06 5th Avenue N Interconnect 300,000 0 0 0 0
20C02 1st Ave S Improvements 300,000 2,700,000 0 0 0
20C24 River Park Fitness Equipment 30,000 0 0 0 0
20C06 Sidewalk Sweeper 26,000 0 0 0 0
6th Avenue South Improvements 0 0 0 2,500,000 2,500,000
TOTAL CRA FUND 656,000 2,700,000 0 2,500,000 2,500,000
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 724 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
STREETS FUND 190
FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
CIP PROJECT Requested
NUMBER DESCRIPTION 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24
*Annual Pavement Resurfacing Program 650,000 650,000 650,000 700,000 700,000
Total Programs Budgeted in the Operations Budget 650,000 650,000 650,000 700,000 700,000
20U31 Alley Maintenance & Improvements 85,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000
20U29 Pedestrian & Bicycle Master Plan Projects 65,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000
20U21 Citywide ADA Accessibility Improvements**15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000
20U07 City Road Bridge Improvements 150,000 150,000 100,000 0 0
20U08 Traffic Operations & Signal System Improvements 50,000 0 0 0 50,000
20U35 12th Avenue South Improvements 170,000 0 0 0 0
Anchor Rode Traffic Calming Project 0 225,000 0 0 0
Intersection/Signal System Improvements 0 0 400,000 0 0
Vehicle Replacement 0 0 0 150,000 0
Total Streets and Traffic CIP Budget 535,000 615,000 740,000 390,000 290,000
TOTAL STREETS AND TRAFFIC FUND 1,185,000 1,265,000 1,390,000 1,090,000 990,000
*Pavement Resurfacing is budgeted in the Operations Budget "Road Resurfacing" line item, and identified on the CIP list for information only.
(1) Coordinate with CRA 8th Street Improvements
FDOT FUNDED PROJECTS 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24
FDOT Reimbursement for Traffic Signal Operations on US41 98,217 100,779 103,538 106,455 109,568
FDOT Reimbursement for US41 Street Lighting 147,108 151,521 156,064 160,745 165,566
FDOT Reimbursement for Traffic Operations Center 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000
FDOT South Golf Drive Bike Lane/Sidewalk: Gulf Shore Blvd to W US41 278,363 0 0 1,975,749 0
FDOT SIDEWALKS: Naples Beach Access 0 0 0 0 0
FDOT SIDEWALK: 3rd Street North (Central Ave - 7th Ave N)0 0 0 0 0
FDOT SIDEWALK: 2nd Street S (6th Ave S - 11th Ave S)0 0 0 0 0
FDOT Mandarin Greenway sidewalks at various locations 0 44,311 0 349,407 0
FDOT DRAINAGE: US-41 Drainage System Replacement Project 0 0 0 0 0
FDOT *Crayton Road & Harbour Drive Improvements - Roundabout 0 0 0 0 760,480
*Crayton Road & Mooring Line Drive Improvements - Roundabout 0 0 0 0 0
*Golden Gate Parkway & US41 Improvements 0 0 0 0 55,400
*Bicycle Detection Systems at 4 intersections 0 0 0 0 80,000
FDOT TOTAL 553,688 326,611 289,602 2,622,356 1,201,014
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 725 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
PART IV CITY OF MARCO ISLAND PROJECTS The projects included in this section of the TIP are located inside the City of Marco Island. The projects are funded through a variety of funding sources including local gas taxes, road impact fees, state and federal grants, and developer commitments. Priorities are established by the Marco Island City Council based upon an analysis of existing conditions and project needs. Some reconstructionand resurfacing projects may have been initially requested by citizens. Other projects are part of the overall maintenance and improvement program, utilizing various funds, with priorities established through careful and continuous monitoring of conditions. Marco Island’s Five Year Capital Improvements Program Summary is shown on the following page. 8.A.1
Packet Pg. 726 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 727 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
PARTVCITY OF EVERGLADES TheCityof EvergladesCitycontinuesto focusattentionon stormwater, drainageandtransportationsystemimprovements.Through collaboration with FDOT and the MPO, the current TIP includes one project in Everglades City; the construction of a sidewalk on the east side of Copeland Avenue from Broadway south to the City limits. In addition, the City has submitted another project for consideration of funding in a future TIP. Thprojectparycle and Pedestrian Master Plan which is still in development. 8.A.1
Packet Pg. 728 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
PART VI FEDERAL FUNDING OBLIGATIONS IN COLLIER MPO AREA FOR THE PRECEEDING YEAR 8.A.1
Packet Pg. 729 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 730 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 731 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 732 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 733 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 734 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 735 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 736 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 737 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 738 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 739 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 740 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 741 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
PARTVIIFTAOBLIGATED PROJECTGS FOR FY 2019The Federal Transit Administration (FTA) annually produces a list of projects for which federal funds have been obligated in the preceding year. The list is shown on the next page. 8.A.1
Packet Pg. 742 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 743 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
PART VIII COLLIER MPO FUNDING SUMMARY The FDOT Five-Year TIP Funding Summary for the Collier MPO is shown on the following page.8.A.1
Packet Pg. 744 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
FundFund Name<202120212022202320242025>2025All YearsTOTAL OUTSIDE YEARS38,594,25600000038,594,256ACBRADVANCE CONSTRUCTION (BRT)00015,00002,592,19702,607,197ACNPADVANCE CONSTRUCTION NHPP02,049,54203,337,3293,367,00771,657,5004,293,91684,705,294ACSAADVANCE CONSTRUCTION (SA)6,963,0380000006,963,038ACSSADVANCE CONSTRUCTION (SS,HSP)01,125,809000001,125,809ACSUADVANCE CONSTRUCTION (SU)1,000,000508,685000001,508,685BNDSBOND - STATE100,000000000100,000BNIRINTRASTATE R/W & BRIDGE BONDS6,030,0902,118,990000008,149,080BRRPSTATE BRIDGE REPAIR & REHAB263,4212,710,9490200,000459,819003,634,189CIGPCOUNTY INCENTIVE GRANT PROGRAM01,500,00004,928,1001,600,000008,028,100CMCONGESTION MITIGATION - AQ522,70501,915,4731,855,7490004,293,927DUNRESTRICTED STATE PRIMARY17,193,8902,719,5072,734,6712,750,2892,766,3782,113,898030,278,633DDRDISTRICT DEDICATED REVENUE28,071,72919,044,3969,452,9337,320,97215,560,6457,578,633087,029,308DIST. - S/W INTER/INTRASTATE HWY8,406005,450,00047,663,25827,106,00026,061,807106,289,471DIHSTATE IN-HOUSE PRODUCT SUPPORT1,211,02730,52017,84843,24072,21517,16001,392,010DPTOSTATE - PTO8,163,2661,167,9261,134,013269,7531,534,7011,245,420013,515,079DSSTATE PRIMARY HIGHWAYS & PTO7,158,1981,404,7893,045,823197,8751,288,0070013,094,692DSB2EVERGLADES PKY/ALLIGATOR ALLEY14,143,3041,400,00082,222,7001,400,0001,445,1501,400,0002,800,000104,811,154DUSTATE PRIMARY/FEDERAL REIMB5,727,114445,470443,232483,535458,797575,55908,133,707FAAFEDERAL AVIATION ADMIN360,1934,500,000237,330900,0000005,997,523FTAFEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION35,313,3362,794,7402,509,4762,972,5603,464,1473,588,170050,642,429GFSAGF STPBG ANY AREA609,339000000609,339GFSUGF STPBG >200 (URBAN)1,232,807774,974000002,007,781GMRGROWTH MANAGEMENT FOR SIS1,799,6080000001,799,608IMDINTERSTATE MAINTENANCE DISCRET204,989000000204,989LFLOCAL FUNDS29,256,5296,600,5382,363,1057,634,09910,027,95111,179,227067,061,449PLMETRO PLAN (85% FA; 15% OTHER)0548,485548,485548,485548,485548,48502,742,425REPEREPURPOSED FEDERAL EARMARKS3,756,6980000003,756,698SASTP, ANY AREA1,194,68551,3007,028,525171,0000008,445,510SR2TSAFE ROUTES - TRANSFER55,7380663,33390,943000810,014STED2012 SB1998-STRATEGIC ECON COR06,900,638000006,900,638SUSTP, URBAN AREAS > 200K1,700,1404,716,4434,706,8204,705,2054,704,8374,699,969025,233,414TALTTRANSPORTATION ALTS- ANY AREA020,000122,4981,022,5870001,165,085TALUTRANSPORTATION ALTS- >200K343,087383,276382,494382,363382,333381,93702,255,490TCSPTRANS, COMMUNITY & SYSTEM PRES754,574000000754,574TO02EVERGLADES PARKWAY69,298,6664,170,0004,175,0004,185,0004,185,0004,185,00020,925,000111,123,666TRIPTRANS REGIONAL INCENTIVE PROGM00002,725,6013,224,71605,950,317TRWR2015 SB2514A-TRAN REG INCT PRG000024,399989,72201,014,121Grand Total281,030,83367,686,977123,703,75950,864,084102,278,730143,083,59354,080,723822,728,6998.A.1
Packet Pg. 745 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
PART IX APPENDICES 8.A.1
Packet Pg. 746 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
APPENDIX AFIRST FIVE YEAR PLAN FY2019/20FY2023/24SECOND FIVE YEAR PLAN FY2024/25FY2028/29COST FEASIBLE PLAN FY2028/29 FY2044/45(2018 Edition)The following pages illustrate the FDOT Strategic Intermodal System (SIS) Plans for District 1. The plans may be downloaded at:https://www.fdot.gov/planning/systems/programs/mspi/plans/default.shtm8.A.1
Packet Pg. 747 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 748 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
10) , excludingTurnpike. Projects in this forwardinto the First Five Year 8.A.1
Packet Pg. 749 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
FacilityCountyNameCountyBoundaryProjectLimitsSISRoadwayMap ID number which corresponds to more detailedproject information in thefacing table above.ProjectPhasesSome projects are fundedin other phase sequencesProject PhasesWork Program Phase consists of Phase Group (major areas of work performed) and Phase Type (who is being paid to perform the work). Phases include all Phase Types other than Phase Type 1 (In-House) and Phase Type 9 (Indirect Support). See the Work Program Instructions at http://www.dot.state.fl.us/programdevelopmentoffice/ for additional information.Project Development and Environment - Study that satisfies the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process resulting in a location design concept for an engineering and environmentally feasible alternative to meet the need determined in the planning phase. Defined by Phase Group 2 (PD&E).Preliminary Engineering - Program to further develop and analyze location and design engineering phases of highway and bridge construction projects. Defined by Phase Group 3 (PE) and Phase Group C (Environmental).Right of Way - The phase of acquiring land to support the construction projects. Defined by Phase Group 4 (ROW). Construction - Phase consists of the physical work performed to build or assemble the infrastructure. Defined by Phase Group 5 (Construction) and Phase Group 6 (Construction Support).In terms of typical project phasesequence as listed in the legend above (e.g. construction is the highest phase)8.A.1
Packet Pg. 750 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 751 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 752 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 753 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 754 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 755 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
10) , excludingTurnpike. Projects in this forwardinto the First Five Year 8.A.1
Packet Pg. 756 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 757 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 758 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 759 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 760 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 761 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
APPENDIX B COLLIER COUNTY AND LEE COUTY REGIONAL ROADWAY MAP8.A.1
Packet Pg. 762 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
Sanibel-CaptivaRdS t r in g fe llo w R dBurntStoreRd CapeCoralPkwyChiquitaBlvdDiplomatPkwySR78SantaBarbaraBlvdDelPradoBlvdU S 4 1
B u s .4 1 US41Metro PkwyOrtizAveI-75 SR82SR867AlicoRdBonitaBchRdUS41ThreeOaksPkwyThree Oaks Pkwy
VanderbiltDrOld41I-75ImmokaleeRdOilWellRdSR 29 ImmokaleeRdUS41Airport-PullingRdLivingstonRdI-75DavisBlvdSantaBarbaraBlvdI-75US41SanMarcoDrSR 29
Camp Keais Rd
Everglades Blvd
GoldenGatePkwyCollier Blvd
SR951HansonExt8.A.1
Packet Pg. 763 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
APPENDIX CAIRPORT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMSINCLUDES:EVERGLADES AIRPARKIMMOKALEE REGIONAL AIRPORTMARCO ISLAND AIRPORTNAPLES MUNICIPAL AIRPORTThe Naples and Collier County Airport Authorities develop annual aviation project priorities. These project priorities are listed in their Joint Airport Capital Improvement Programs. (JACIP) and capital improvement plans for each of the airports within the CollierMPO planning area. These programs and plans have been coordinated with the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA).8.A.1
Packet Pg. 764 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 765 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 766 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 767 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 768 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 769 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 770 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 771 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 772 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
APPENDIX DACRONYMSand FUND and PHASE CODES8.A.1
Packet Pg. 773 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 774 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 775 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
CodeDescriptionFund GroupFund Group DescriptionACANADVANCE CONSTRUCTION ANY AREAF32O.F.A. -AC FUNDINGACBRADVANCE CONSTRUCTION (BRT)F22NH-AC FUNDINGACBZADVANCE CONSTRUCTION (BRTZ)F32O.F.A. -AC FUNDINGACCMADVANCE CONSTRUCTION (CM)F32O.F.A. -AC FUNDINGACEMEARMARKS ACF43100% FEDERAL DEMO/EARMARKACERADVANCE CONSTRUCTION (ER)F32O.F.A. -AC FUNDINGACFPAC FREIGHT PROG (NFP)F32O.F.A. -AC FUNDINGACIDADV CONSTRUCTION SAFETY (HSID)F32O.F.A. -AC FUNDINGACLDADV CONSTRUCTION SAFETY (HSLD)F32O.F.A. -AC FUNDINGACNHADVANCE CONSTRUCTION (NH)F22NH-AC FUNDINGACNPADVANCE CONSTRUCTION NHPPF22NH-AC FUNDINGACSAADVANCE CONSTRUCTION (SA)F32O.F.A. -AC FUNDINGACSBADVANCE CONSTRUCTION (SABR)F32O.F.A. -AC FUNDINGACSLADVANCE CONSTRUCTION (SL)F32O.F.A. -AC FUNDINGACSNADVANCE CONSTRUCTION (SN)F32O.F.A. -AC FUNDINGACSSADVANCE CONSTRUCTION (SS,HSP)F32O.F.A. -AC FUNDINGACSUADVANCE CONSTRUCTION (SU)F32O.F.A. -AC FUNDINGACTAADVANCE CONSTRUCTION TALTF32O.F.A. -AC FUNDINGACTLADVANCE CONSTRUCTION TALLF32O.F.A. -AC FUNDINGACTNADVANCE CONSTRUCTION TALNF32O.F.A. -AC FUNDINGACTUADVANCE CONSTRUCTION TALUF32O.F.A. -AC FUNDINGBNBRAMENDMENT 4 BONDS (BRIDGES)N31BONDSBNDSBOND -STATEN31BONDS8.A.1
Packet Pg. 776 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
BNIRINTRASTATE R/W & BRIDGE BONDSN31BONDSBRACBRT (AC/REGULAR)F34O.F.A. -AC/REGULARBRPSTATE BRIDGE REPLACEMENTN11100% STATEBRRPSTATE BRIDGE REPAIR & REHABN11100% STATEBRTFED BRIDGE REPL -ON SYSTEMF31O.F.A. -REGULAR FUNDSBRTDFED BRIDGE REPL--DISCRETIONARYF33O.F.A. -DEMO/EARMARK FUNDSBRTZFED BRIDGE REPL -OFF SYSTEMF31O.F.A. -REGULAR FUNDSCFACONTRACTOR FUNDS ADVANCEN49OTHER NON-FEDERAL FUNDSCIGPCOUNTY INCENTIVE GRANT PROGRAMN12100% STATE -SINGLE AUDIT ACTCMCONGESTION MITIGATION -AQF31O.F.A. -REGULAR FUNDSCOECORP OF ENGINEERS (NON-BUDGET)F49100% FEDERAL NON-FHWACOOPCOOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS -FHWAF49100% FEDERAL NON-FHWADUNRESTRICTED STATE PRIMARYN11100% STATEDCSTATE PRIMARY PE CONSULTANTSN11100% STATEDDRDISTRICT DEDICATED REVENUEN11100% STATEDEMENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATIONN11100% STATEDEREMERGENCY RELIEF -STATE FUNDSN11100% STATEDFTAFED PASS-THROUGH $ FROM FTAF49100% FEDERAL NON-FHWADIST. -S/W INTER/INTRASTATE HWYN11100% STATEDIHSTATE IN-HOUSE PRODUCT SUPPORTN11100% STATEDIOHSTATE 100% -OVERHEADN11100% STATEDISSTRATEGIC INTERMODAL SYSTEMN11100% STATEDITSSTATEWIDE ITS -STATE 100%.N11100% STATEDLLOCAL FUNDS -PTO -BUDGETEDN44LOCALDPTOSTATE -PTON11100% STATEDRAREST AREAS -STATE 100%N11100% STATEDSSTATE PRIMARY HIGHWAYS & PTON11100% STATEDSB0UNALLOCATED TO FACILITYN41TOLL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTDSB1SKYWAYN41TOLL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT8.A.1
Packet Pg. 777 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
DSB2EVERGLADES PKY/ALLIGATOR ALLEYN41TOLL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTDSB3PINELLAS BAYWAYN41TOLL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTDSB6TAMPA-HILLSBOROUGH EXPR. AUTH.N41TOLL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTDSB7MID-BAY BRIDGE AUTHORITYN41TOLL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTDSBCGARCON POINT BRIDGEN41TOLL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTDSBDI-95 EXPRESS LANESN41TOLL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTDSBFI-595N41TOLL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTDSBGI-75 ML TOLL CAP IMPROVEMENTN41TOLL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTDSBHI-4 ML TOLL CAP IMPROVEMENTN41TOLL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTDSBIPALMETTO ML TOLL CAP IMPROVEN41TOLL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTDSBJI-295 EXPRESS LANES -CAPITALN41TOLL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTDSBKTAMPA BAY EXPRESS LANESN41TOLL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTDSBTTURNPIKE/REIMBURSED BY TOLLN41TOLL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTDSBWWEKIVA PARKWAYN41TOLL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTDSPCSERVICE PATROL CONTRACTN11100% STATEDUSTATE PRIMARY/FEDERAL REIMBF49100% FEDERAL NON-FHWADWSWEIGH STATIONS -STATE 100%N11100% STATEEBEQUITY BONUSF31O.F.A. -REGULAR FUNDSEBBPEQUITY BONUS SUPPLEMENTING BDGF34O.F.A. -AC/REGULAREBNHEQUITY BONUS SUPPLEMENTING NHF34O.F.A. -AC/REGULAREBOHEQUITY BONUS -OVERHEADF31O.F.A. -REGULAR FUNDSEM18GAA EARMARKS FY 2018N11100% STATEEM19GAAEARMARKS FY 2019N11100% STATEEM20GAA EARMARKS FY 2020N11100% STATEER122012 EMERGENCY RELIEF EVENTSF42100% FEDERAL EMERGENCY FUNDSER132013 EMERGENCY RELIEF EVENTSF42100% FEDERAL EMERGENCY FUNDSER14SPRING FLOODING 2014F42100% FEDERAL EMERGENCY FUNDSER162016 EMERGENCY RELIEF EVENTSF42100% FEDERAL EMERGENCY FUNDSER172017 EMERGENCY RELIEF EVENTSF42100% FEDERAL EMERGENCY FUNDS8.A.1
Packet Pg. 778 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
ER182018 EMERGENCY RELIEF EVENTSF42100% FEDERAL EMERGENCY FUNDSER192019EMERGENCY RELIEF EVENTSF42100% FEDERAL EMERGENCY FUNDSF001FEDERAL DISCRETIONARY -US19F33O.F.A. -DEMO/EARMARK FUNDSF330SEC 330 STP EARMARKS 2003F43100% FEDERAL DEMO/EARMARKFAAFEDERAL AVIATION ADMINF49100% FEDERAL NON-FHWAFBDFERRYBOAT DISCRETIONARYF33O.F.A. -DEMO/EARMARK FUNDSFCOPRIMARY/FIXED CAPITAL OUTLAYN11100% STATEFD21FDM-DODGE ISLAND TUNNELF33O.F.A. -DEMO/EARMARK FUNDSFEDRFEDERAL RESEARCH ACTIVITIESF43100% FEDERAL DEMO/EARMARKFEMAFED EMERGENCY MGT AGENCYF49100% FEDERAL NON-FHWAFHPPFEDERAL HIGH PRIORITY PROJECTSF33O.F.A. -DEMO/EARMARK FUNDSFINCFINANCING CORPN51FINC -FINANCING CORP.FLAPFEDERAL LANDS ACCESS PROGRAMF41100% FEDERAL FUNDSFLEMFL DIV OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENTN49OTHER NON-FEDERAL FUNDSFRAFEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATNF49100% FEDERAL NON-FHWAFSF1FED STIMULUS, S/W MANAGEDF45100% FEDERAL STIMULUS PROGRAMFTAFEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATIONF49100% FEDERAL NON-FHWAFTATFHWA TRANSFER TO FTA (NON-BUD)F43100% FEDERAL DEMO/EARMARKGFSAGF STPBG ANY AREAF31O.F.A. -REGULAR FUNDSGFSLGF STPBG <200K<5K (SMALL URB)F31O.F.A. -REGULAR FUNDSGFSNGF STPBG <5K (RURAL)F31O.F.A. -REGULAR FUNDSGFSUGF STPBG >200 (URBAN)F31O.F.A. -REGULAR FUNDSGMRGROWTH MANAGEMENT FOR SISN11100% STATEGR17GENERAL REVENUE FOR FY2017 GAAN11100% STATEGREMGENERAL REVENUE EMERGENCY MGMTN11100% STATEGRSCGROWTH MANAGEMENT FOR SCOPN11100% STATEHPFEDERAL HIGHWAY PLANNINGF31O.F.A. -REGULAR FUNDSHPPHIGH PRIORITY PROJECTSF43100% FEDERAL DEMO/EARMARKHRFEDERAL HIGHWAY RESEARCHF31O.F.A. -REGULAR FUNDS8.A.1
Packet Pg. 779 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
HRRRHIGH RISK RURAL ROADF31O.F.A. -REGULAR FUNDSHSIDINTERSECTION CRASHESF31O.F.A. -REGULAR FUNDSHSLDLANE DEPARTURE CRASHESF31O.F.A. -REGULAR FUNDSHSPSAFETY (HIWAY SAFETY PROGRAM)F31O.F.A. -REGULAR FUNDSHSPTSAFETY EDUCATIONAL-TRANSFERREDF31O.F.A. -REGULAR FUNDSIBRCINNOVATIVE BRIDGE RES & CONSTF43100% FEDERAL DEMO/EARMARKIMINTERSTATE MAINTENANCEF11I, IM -REGULAR FUNDINGIMACIM (AC/REGULAR)F13IM -AC/REGULARIMDINTERSTATE MAINTENANCE DISCRETF14I, IM -DISCRETIONARYIVHINTELLIGENT VEHICLE HIWAY SYSTF33O.F.A. -DEMO/EARMARK FUNDSLFLOCAL FUNDSN44LOCALLFBLOCAL FUNDS BUDGETN44LOCALLFBNLOCAL TO RESERVE BNDS BUDGETN31BONDSLFD"LF" FOR STTF UTILITY WORKN11100% STATELFFLOCAL FUND -FOR MATCHING F/AN44LOCALLFILOCAL FUNDS INTEREST EARNEDN44LOCALLFNELOCAL FUNDS NOT IN ESCROWN44LOCALLFPLOCAL FUNDS FOR PARTICIPATINGN44LOCALLFRLOCAL FUNDS/REIMBURSIBLEN44LOCALLFRFLOCAL FUND REIMBURSABLE-FUTUREN44LOCALLFULOCAL FUNDS_FOR UNFORSEEN WORKN11100% STATEMCORMULTI-USE COR S.338.2278,F.S.N11100% STATEMCSGMOTOR CARRIER SAFETY GRANTF49100% FEDERAL NON-FHWANFPNATIONAL FREIGHT PROGRAMF31O.F.A. -REGULAR FUNDSNFPDNAT FREIGHT PGM-DISCRETIONARYF31O.F.A. -REGULAR FUNDSNHPRINCIPAL ARTERIALSF21NH-REGULAR FUNDINGNHACNH (AC/REGULAR)F23NH-AC/REGULARNHBRNATIONAL HIGWAYS BRIDGESF21NH-REGULAR FUNDINGNHEXNATIONAL PERFORM PROG. EXEMPTF21NH-REGULAR FUNDING8.A.1
Packet Pg. 780 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
NHPPIM, BRDG REPL, NATNL HWY-MAP21F21NH-REGULAR FUNDINGNHRENAT HWY PERFORM -RESURFACINGF31O.F.A. -REGULAR FUNDSNHTSNATIONAL HWY TRAFFIC SAFETYF49100% FEDERAL NON-FHWANSTPNEW STARTS TRANSIT PROGRAMN11100% STATENSWR2015 SB2514A-NEW STARTS TRANSTN11100% STATEPKBDTURNPIKE MASTER BOND FUNDN21TURNPIKE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTPKED2012SB1998-TURNPIKE FEEDER RDN11100% STATEPKERTPK MAINTENANCE RESERVE-ERN24TURNPIKE EMERGENCYPKLFLOCAL SUPPORT FOR TURNPIKEN45LOCAL -TURNPIKEPKM1TURNPIKE TOLL MAINTENANCEN21TURNPIKE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTPKOHTURNPIKE INDIRECT COSTSN21TURNPIKE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTPKYITURNPIKE IMPROVEMENTN21TURNPIKE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTPKYOTURNPIKE TOLL COLLECTION/OPER.N22TURNPIKE OPERATIONSPKYRTURNPIKE RENEWAL & REPLACEMENTN21TURNPIKE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTPLMETRO PLAN (85% FA; 15% OTHER)F41100% FEDERAL FUNDSPLHPUBLIC LANDS HIGHWAYF41100% FEDERAL FUNDSPLHDPUBLIC LANDS HIGHWAY DISCRF43100% FEDERAL DEMO/EARMARKPOED2012 SB1998-SEAPORT INVESTMENTN11100% STATEPORBPORT FUNDS RETURNED FROM BONDSN11100% STATEPORTSEAPORTSN11100% STATERBRPREIMBURSABLE BRP FUNDSN11100% STATERECTRECREATIONAL TRAILSF31O.F.A. -REGULAR FUNDSREDREDISTR. OF FA (SEC 1102F)F31O.F.A. -REGULAR FUNDSREPEREPURPOSED FEDERAL EARMARKSF43100% FEDERAL DEMO/EARMARKRHHRAIL HIGHWAY X-INGS -HAZARDF31O.F.A. -REGULAR FUNDSRHPRAIL HIGHWAY X-INGS -PROT DEVF31O.F.A. -REGULAR FUNDSS112STP EARMARKS -2006F43100% FEDERAL DEMO/EARMARKS115STP EARMARKS -2004F43100% FEDERAL DEMO/EARMARKS117STP EARMARKS -2005F43100% FEDERAL DEMO/EARMARK8.A.1
Packet Pg. 781 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
S125STP EARMARKS -2009F43100% FEDERAL DEMO/EARMARKS129STP EARMARKS -2008F43100% FEDERAL DEMO/EARMARKSASTP, ANY AREAF31O.F.A. -REGULAR FUNDSSAANSTP, ANY AREA -NOT ON NHSF31O.F.A. -REGULAR FUNDSSABRSTP, BRIDGESF31O.F.A. -REGULAR FUNDSSAFESECURE AIRPORTS FOR FL ECONOMYN11100% STATESBSCENIC BYWAYSF33O.F.A. -DEMO/EARMARK FUNDSSCED2012 SB1998-SMALL CO OUTREACHN11100% STATESCMCSCOP M-CORR S.338.2278,F.S.N11100% STATESCOPSMALL COUNTY OUTREACH PROGRAMN12100% STATE -SINGLE AUDIT ACTSCRASMALL COUNTY RESURFACINGN12100% STATE -SINGLE AUDIT ACTSCRCSCOP FOR RURAL COMMUNITIESN11100% STATESCWR2015 SB2514A-SMALL CO OUTREACHN12100% STATE -SINGLE AUDIT ACTSESTP, ENHANCEMENTF31O.F.A. -REGULAR FUNDSSEDSTATE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENTN11100% STATESIB1STATE INFRASTRUCTURE BANKN48OTHER SIB FUNDSSIBFFEDERAL FUNDED SIBF49100% FEDERAL NON-FHWASIWR2015SB2514A-STRATEGIC INT SYSN11100% STATESLSTP, AREAS <= 200KF31O.F.A. -REGULAR FUNDSSNSTP, MANDATORY NON-URBAN <= 5KF31O.F.A. -REGULAR FUNDSSPNPROCEED FROM SPONSOR AGREEMENTN11100% STATESR2ESAFE ROUTES -EITHERF31O.F.A. -REGULAR FUNDSSR2NSAFE ROUTES NON-INFRASTRUCTUREF31O.F.A. -REGULAR FUNDSSR2SSAFE ROUTES -INFRASTRUCTUREF31O.F.A. -REGULAR FUNDSSR2TSAFE ROUTES -TRANSFERF31O.F.A. -REGULAR FUNDSSRMCSCRAP M-CORR S.338.2278,F.S.N11100% STATESROMSUNRAIL REVENUES FOR O AND MN49OTHER NON-FEDERAL FUNDSSSMFED SUPPORT SERVICES/MINORITYF41100% FEDERAL FUNDSST10STP EARMARKS -2010F43100% FEDERAL DEMO/EARMARK8.A.1
Packet Pg. 782 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
STED2012 SB1998-STRATEGIC ECON CORN11100% STATESUSTP, URBAN AREAS > 200KF31O.F.A. -REGULAR FUNDSTALLTRANSPORTATION ALTS-<200KF31O.F.A. -REGULAR FUNDSTALNTRANSPORTATION ALTS-< 5KF31O.F.A. -REGULAR FUNDSTALTTRANSPORTATION ALTS-ANY AREAF31O.F.A. -REGULAR FUNDSTALUTRANSPORTATION ALTS->200KF31O.F.A. -REGULAR FUNDSTCPFUEL TAX COMPLIANCE PROJECTF41100% FEDERAL FUNDSTCSPTRANS, COMMUNITY & SYSTEM PRESF43100% FEDERAL DEMO/EARMARKTD18TD COMMISSION EARMARKS FY 2018N11100% STATETD19TD COMMISSION EARMARKS FY 2019N11100% STATETD20TD COMMISSION EARMARKS FY 2020N11100% STATETDDRTRANS DISADV -DDR USEN49OTHER NON-FEDERAL FUNDSTDEDTRANS DISADV TRUST FUND -$10MN49OTHER NON-FEDERAL FUNDSTDMCTD M-CORR S.338.2278,F.S.N11100% STATETDPDTD PAYROLL REDIST D FUNDSN11100% STATETDTFTRANS DISADV -TRUST FUNDN49OTHER NON-FEDERAL FUNDSTGRTIGER/BUILD GRANT THROUGH FHWAF43100% FEDERAL DEMO/EARMARKTIFITRANS INFRAST FIN & INNOV ACTF49100% FEDERAL NON-FHWATIFRTIFIA FUNDS REDISTRIBUTEDF41100% FEDERAL FUNDSTIGRTIGER/BUILD HIGHWAY GRANTF49100% FEDERAL NON-FHWATIMPTRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTSF33O.F.A. -DEMO/EARMARK FUNDSTLWR2015 SB2514A-TRAIL NETWORKN11100% STATETM01SUNSHINE SKYWAYN43TOLL MAINTENANCETM02EVERGLADES PARKWAYN43TOLL MAINTENANCETM03PINELLAS BAYWAYN43TOLL MAINTENANCETM06TAMPA-HILLSBOROUGH EXPR. AUTH.N43TOLL MAINTENANCETM07MID-BAY BRIDGE AUTHORITYN43TOLL MAINTENANCETM11ORLANDO-ORANGE CO. EXPR. SYSTEN43TOLL MAINTENANCETMBCGARCON POINT BRIDGEN43TOLL MAINTENANCE8.A.1
Packet Pg. 783 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
TMBDI-95 EXPRESS LANESN43TOLL MAINTENANCETMBGI-75 ML TOLL MAINTENANCEN43TOLL MAINTENANCETMBHI-4 ML TOLL MAINTENANCEN43TOLL MAINTENANCETMBIPALMETTO ML TOLL MAINTENANCEN43TOLL MAINTENANCETMBJI-295 EXPRESS LANES -MAINTN43TOLL MAINTENANCETMBKTAMPA BAY EXPRESS LANES-MAINTN43TOLL MAINTENANCETMBWWEKIVA PARKWAY TOLL MAINTN43TOLL MAINTENANCETO01SUNSHINE SKYWAYN42TOLL OPERATIONSTO02EVERGLADES PARKWAYN42TOLL OPERATIONSTO03PINELLAS BAYWAYN42TOLL OPERATIONSTO04MIAMI-DADE EXPRESSWAY AUTH.N42TOLL OPERATIONSTO06TAMPA-HILLSBOROUGH EXPR. AUTH.N42TOLL OPERATIONSTO07MID-BAY BRIDGE AUTHORITYN42TOLL OPERATIONSTO11ORLANDO-ORANGE CO. EXPR. SYST.N42TOLL OPERATIONSTOBCGARCON POINT BRIDGEN42TOLL OPERATIONSTOBDI-95 EXPRESS LANESN42TOLL OPERATIONSTOBFI-595N42TOLL OPERATIONSTOBGI-75 ML TOLL OPERATIONSN42TOLL OPERATIONSTOBHI-4 ML TOLL OPERATIONSN42TOLL OPERATIONSTOBIPALMETTO ML TOLL OPERATIONSN42TOLL OPERATIONSTOBJI-295 EXPRESS LANES-OPERATINGN42TOLL OPERATIONSTOBKTAMPA BAY EXP LANES OPERATINGN42TOLL OPERATIONSTOBWWEKIVA PARKWAY TOLL OPERATIONSN42TOLL OPERATIONSTPFPTRUCK PARKING FACILITIES PGMF33O.F.A. -DEMO/EARMARK FUNDSTRIPTRANS REGIONAL INCENTIVE PROGMN12100% STATE -SINGLE AUDIT ACTTRWR2015 SB2514A-TRAN REG INCT PRGN12100% STATE -SINGLE AUDIT ACTTSMTRANSPORT SYSTEMS MANAGEMENTF41100% FEDERAL FUNDSWFMCWF M-CORR S.338.2278,F.S.N11100% STATEWKBL2012 SB1998-TRANS BEACHLINE-TPN11100% STATE8.A.1
Packet Pg. 784 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
WKOC2012 SB1998-REPAYMNT OOC DEBTN11100% STATEThis site is maintained by the Office of Work Program and Budget, located at 605 Suwannee Street, MS 21, Tallahassee, Florida 32399.8.A.1
Packet Pg. 785 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
APPENDIXERANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN(LRTP)COST FEASIBLE PLAN(HGHWAY AND TRANSIT)To view the entire Collier 2040 LRTP pleasevisit:8.A.1
Packet Pg. 786 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
2021-2040 2041-2050 PE ROW CST PE ROW CST PE ROW CST Project Totals YOE CST 43SR 29North of SR 82Collier/Hendry Line22.4$7.89n/a$41.40$34.54n/an/an/aCST PDC2021-20252026-20302031-20402040 Cost Feasible Plan - Summary of Funded Projects Grouped by Funding Source with Costs Shown in Future Year of Expenditure (YOE) in Millions of DollarsCF#FacilityFromTo# ofExistingLanesProjectLength(Miles)Project Type8.A.1
Packet Pg. 787 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
Transit Cost Feasible Plan –Service Schedule
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 788 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
Transit Cost Feasible Plan –Operating and Capital Costs Summary
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 789 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 790 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 791 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 792 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
APPENDIX GSUMMARY OF PUBLIC COMMENTS8.A.1
Packet Pg. 793 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 794 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
APPENDIXFISCALCONSTRAINT 8.A.1
Packet Pg. 795 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
$67,686,977 $123,703,759 $50,864,084 $102,278,730 $143,083,593
$67,686,977 $123,703,759 $50,864,084 $102,278,730 $143,083,593 $487,617,143
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 796 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
APPENDIX ICRITERIA USED FOR PROJECT PRIORITIZATION8.A.1
Packet Pg. 797 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
MPO Board Allocation of its Transportation Management Area (TMA) Funds
The MPO Board adopted a temporary suspension of its former allocation formula for TMA funds
on March 10, 2017. The new, temporary policy allocates 100% of its TMA Funds annually for
five-years as follows: Year 1 –Pedestrian and Bicycle, Year 2 – Bridges, Year 3, Congestion
Management, Year 4 –Pedestrian and Bicycle, and Year 5 –Congestion Management. The Cost
Feasible Plan of the Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)contains a budget line item for these
project categories but does not list individual projects (except for bridge projects) within these
categories.
FDOT requires that the TIP includes the MPO’s criteria and process for prioritizing projects. The
questions/criteria used by the MPO to prioritize projects are listed in the tables below.
Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects
On March 8, 2019, the MPO Board adopted the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan which contains
the criteria and point system that will be used to evaluate bicycle and pedestrian projects. Project
evaluation occurs in a two-step process. First, MPO staff conducts a preliminary assessment for
eligibility according to the following criteria: a) timeliness, b) constructability and c) funding
availability. Next, MPO staff and advisory committees evaluate, score and rank the projects
according to the criteria, points, and associated Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) goal(s)
listed below.
Safety
LRTP Goal: Improve the safety of the transportation system for users
Implements a recommended action in a Bicycle/Pedestrian Road Safety Audit – 5 points
Addresses a safety concern involving serious injuries and fatalities as identified in this Plan,
absent a Safety Audit to verify the proposed mitigation measure – 3 points
Addresses a safety concern involving crashes of less severity, absent a Safety Audit to verify the
proposed mitigation measure – 2 points
Addresses a safety concern expressed by members of the public in the absence of crash records –
1 point
Equity
LRTP Goal: Promote the integrated planning of transportation and land use
Fills a need associated with an Environmental Justice community or use identified in this Plan – 5
points
Fills a need associated with an area that meets some, but not all EJ criteria used in identifying EJ
communities for this Plan – 3 points
Fills a need associated with an area that does not have adequate access to nonmotorized
transportation facilities based upon public input received in the development of this Plan –1
point
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 798 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
Connectivity
LRTP Goal: Improve System Continuity and Connectivity
LRTP Goal: Promote multi-modal solutions
Fills a prioritized infrastructure gap identified in this Plan – 5 points
Fills a need for improved connectivity based upon public input received in the development of
this Plan – 2 points
Congestion Management Projects
Congestion management projects were evaluated based on the Congestion Management Process
(CMP)2017 Update. Project eligibility was first determined based on the 11 criteria below,which
reflect the Performance Measures adopted as part of the CMP 2017 Update. Each of the criteria
addresses one or more goals of the LRTP which are also listed below. The Congestion
Management Committee (CMC) then prioritized the eligible projects using a Delphi method.
Eligibility Criteria LRTP Goal
Maintains concurrency w/FDOT Regional ITS
and/or Technical advances
reduce roadway congestion
Increases number of connected signalized
intersections
reduce roadway congestion
increase the safety of the transportation
system
Improves Travel Time Reliability reduce roadway congestion
Capacity Enhancement improve system continuity and
connectivity
Increases ridership on existing route and
increases number of riders at specific transit
stops before/after installation
promote multi-modal solutions
Improves bike/ped connections to bus shelters,
inclusive of meeting ADA requirements
promote multi-modal solutions
improve system continuity and
connectivity
Reduces the miles of gaps in cycling network
per 2016 Inventory
promote multi-modal solutions
improve system continuity and
connectivity
increase the safety of the transportation
system
Addresses a problem area identified in B/P
safety study, Walkability Study or B/P Safety
Audit
increase the safety of the transportation
system
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 799 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
Study that is Travel Demand Management (TDM) related
Study that is related to New Network Connections
Study that is related to an Intermodal Hub(s)
Bridge Project Application Criteria
Bridge projects were drawn from the County’s East of CR 951 Bridge Report. The LRTP and
therefore Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) recommendations for bridge projects come
directly from this report. The criteria used to evaluate bridge projects and the associated LRTP
goal are listed in the table below.
Question/Criteria LRTP Goal
Emergency response times and proximity to responding
agency.
Increase the safety of the
transportation system for users.
Impact of bridge on increasing mobility and ease of
evacuation.
Improve system continuity and
connectivity.
Gains in service efficiency, particularly for schools.Improve system continuity and
connectivity.
Public sentiment.
Transit Project Selection
Collier Area Transit (CAT) provides the MPO with transit priorities. These priorities are based
on the Transit Development Plan which is the strategic guide for public transportation in Collier
County. The plan is updated annually, and a major update is completed every five years. The
development of proposed transit projects is based on:
1.Situational Appraisal which is an assessment of CAT’s operating environment to identify
community needs.
2.Transit Demand Assessment which is a technical analysis of transit demand and needs used
to identify areas with characteristics supportive of transit.
3.Discussion with public agency staffs, visioning surveys, workshops, and stakeholder
discussions.
4.Coordination with the MPO in the long-range transportation planning process
Long Range Transportation Plan Goals associated with the selection of transit
projects include:
Reduce roadway congestion.
Promote multi-modal solutions.
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 800 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
Promote the integrated planning of transportation and land use.
5.Transit Asset Management (TAM) Performance Measures – The MPO adopted the Board of
County Commissioners’ TAM Targets on November 9, 2018:
Although the 2019 Transit Priorities submitted by County staff did not include State of Good
Repair related projects, the MPO gave staff direction in December 2019 to use available SU
funds to purchase a replacement bus for $500,000 and to fund a project to enhance accessibility
at 10 bus stops to meet ADA requirements for $250,000 in FY 2020. The MPO will request the
inclusion of State of Good Repair related projects when soliciting Transit Priorities in calendar
year 2020.
The LRTP and the TIP
The LRTP is also the source of other projects contained in the TIP.Proposed projects in an LRTP’s
Cost Feasible Plan are evaluated, in part, on their merits to improve traffic flow, capacity and
congestion as analyzed using the Travel Demand Model (D1RPM). The LRTP used several
additional criteria in project evaluation including:
1.Freight system improvement
2.Wetland and species impacts
3.Evacuation route
4.Cost per lane mile
5.Reduction in congestion
Projects identified in an LRTP needs analysis are selected for inclusion in the Cost Feasible Plan
based on their needs analysis ranking and on a financial analysis of funds that can reasonably be
expected to be available for transportation investments during the timeframe of the plan. Each
year, the MPO will select a subset of the projects in the Cost Feasible Plan for inclusion in the
upcoming TIP.
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 801 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
APPENDIX JADDITIONAL PLANS and STUDIES(That are in the UPWP and that are using SU funds, but that are not included in the TIP.)8.A.1
Packet Pg. 802 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) Project PriorityOn September 13, 2019, the MPO Board unanimously approved designating the development of the 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan(LRTP)asaprojectpriority.Asaresultofthisaction,theMPOadded$200,000ofitsSurfaceTransportationFundsforUrbanized Area (SU) to the development of the LRTP bringing the total LRTP budget to$590,418.A LRTP is a long-range planning document that comprehensively considers the future needs of all forms of transportation based on projected economic growth and an increasing population.PriorityFiscal YearProject CostPlan or StudyLocal Road Safety Plan (LRSP)TheLocalRoadSafetyPlanwasformerlycalledtheStrategicHighwaySafetyPlan.OnOctober11,2019theMPOBoardunanimously approved a $200,000 contract for development of a Local Road Safety Plan (LRSP). The Plan will be completed in the second half of 2020. The LRSP will prioritize opportunities to improve highway safety and recommend strategies and budgets for programs and policiesthatcanreducethelossoflife,injuriesandpropertydamagefromcrashesoccurringonthecounty-widenetworkofstreetsand highways.Park and Ride StudyThe Park and Ride Study, funded in FY 2019for $60,000.will identify prime locations, site plan considerations and planning level cost estimates that will aid the County and MPO Board in prioritizing future project expenditures. The anticipated completion date is October 2020.8.A.1
Packet Pg. 803 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 804 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 805 Attachment: FY 2021- FY2025 TIP (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
8.A.2
Packet Pg. 806 Attachment: Resolution 2020-07 (12552 : Adopt the FY2021 - FY2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Authorizing Resolution)
06/12/2020
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Approve 2020 Priority Projects
OBJECTIVE: For the Board to approve the 2020 Priority Projects.
CONSIDERATIONS: The 2020 Priority Projects are shown in Attachment 1; summarized by page
number as follows:
• P1. Bike-Ped: Bicycle and pedestrian projects are slated to receive 100% of the MPO’s annual
Surface Transportation-Urban (SU) federal funding allocation for FY2026, approximately $4.1
million. The Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) rated and ranked ten new
projects submitted in response to the MPO’s Call for Projects. Based on project phases, the first
year of funding would total roughly $3.1 million. Total project costs are estimated to be $13.4
million, roughly equivalent to three years of SU funding. FDOT has in the past programmed
funds from a variety of sources to augment the MPO’s SU funds as projects move from design to
construction. FDOT is currently reviewing project scopes and cost estimates and has advised
MPO staff of the potential for significant cost increases on two projects in particular. 1) The
Project Development and Environmental (PD&E) study for the Marco Island Loop Trail is likely
to be costly due to potential environmental impacts and the need to coordinate with many
environmental groups and stakeholders, including tribal governments, and the Feasibility Study’s
cost estimate has increased from $90,000 to $250,000. 2) The Naples Freedom Park Pedestrian
Overpass will first have to have a PD&E programmed and the Design phase cost estimate will
most likely need to be increased due to various environmental, utility, bridge placement and
design and other factors that need to be addressed. Once the cost estimates are better defined,
MPO staff will work with City of Naples staff to confirm the City Council’s support for the
project. This may require MPO staff to present at a City Council meeting over the summer.
• P2. Bridge: Priorities have not changed; project status updated. Collier County is in the process
of reviewing priorities established in the East of 951 Bridge Study (2008).
• P3. Congestion Management: Priorities have not changed; project status updated.
• P4. Transit: County Public Transportation and Neighborhood Enhancement (PTNE) Division
staff submit new transit priorities annually. This year’s list identifies more asset management-
related projects as a reflection of the Transit Asset Management Plan targets, which the MPO
adopted.
• P5. Highways: New projects added, and project status updated. MPO staff added a new 2040
LRTP priority project slated for construction in the 2026-2030 timeframe: US 41/Tamiami Trail
from Greenway Rd to 6-L Farm. FDOT completed the PD&E in 2008.
• P6. Planning: MPO staff added a new planning study - the 2050 LRTP. Work on the update
begins in FY 2024.
• P7. Joint Lee/Collier TRIP: County Transportation Planning Division staff coordinated the
updates to this list with Lee County MPO staff. Lee County TAC endorsed the TRIP priorities on
5/7/2020.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: The Bike-Ped projects were evaluated, prioritized and
endorsed by BPAC in November 2019 and the committee received a briefing on project cost estimates at
their May 19, 2020 meeting. The Citizens Advisory Committee and Technical Advisory Committee voted
to endorse the 2020 Priority Projects at their May 18, 2020 meeting.
9.A
Packet Pg. 807
06/12/2020
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the Board approve the 2020 Priority Projects with the caveat that
MPO staff is directed to confirm whether the new Naples City Council supports the Naples Freedom Park
Pedestrian Overpass project.
Prepared By: Anne McLaughlin, MPO Director
ATTACHMENT(S)
1. 2020 Project Priorities (PDF)
9.A
Packet Pg. 808
06/12/2020
COLLIER COUNTY
Metropolitan Planning Organization
Item Number: 9.A
Doc ID: 12553
Item Summary: Approve 2020 Priority Projects
Meeting Date: 06/12/2020
Prepared by:
Title: – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Karen Intriago
06/03/2020 11:03 AM
Submitted by:
Title: Executive Director - MPO – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Anne McLaughlin
06/03/2020 11:03 AM
Approved By:
Review:
Metropolitan Planning Organization Brandy Otero MPO Analyst Review Completed 06/03/2020 11:07 AM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin MPO Executive Director Review Completed 06/03/2020 12:19 PM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin Meeting Pending 06/12/2020 9:00 AM
9.A
Packet Pg. 809
Rank Score
Location/
Jurisdiction Project Project Type Yr 1 Future Yrs Totals
1 13 District 5 Carson, S 9th, N 9th Sidewalks 136,132$ 626,202$ 762,334$
2 10 District 2 Wiggins Pass Sidewalks, Bike Lanes 125,400$ 961,500$ 1,086,900$
2 10 Marco N Collier Blvd Alt Bike Lanes In-Road Bike Lanes 965,734$ 965,734$
2 10 District 4
Pine St, Wisconsin, Illinois,
Hollygate, Cooper Sidewalks 90,666$ 637,862$ 728,528$
2 10 District 1 Holland, Caldwell, Sholtz Sidewalks 241,861$ 1,112,555$ 1,354,416$
2 10 District 3 24th Pl, 27th Pl, 43rd St, 47th Terr Sidewalks 226,352$ 1,041,219$ 1,267,571$
3 8 Everglades Copeland, Hisbiscus, Broadway Sidewalks, Bike Lanes 137,292$ 1,153,252$ 1,290,544$
3 8 MPO MPO Feasibility CR951 & CR92 Trail Feasibility Study $ 250,000 $ 250,000
4 7 Naples Freedom Park Ped Overpass Pedestrian Overpass 200,000$ 4,782,794$ 4,982,794$
5 2 Naples 26 Ave N Sidewalk 673,488$ 673,488$
TOTALS $ 3,046,925 10,315,384$ $ 13,362,309
Total cost estimate $13,362,309
2020 Collier MPO Bicycle Pedestrian Priorities as Ranked by the BPAC on Nov. 19,
2019 cost estimates updated as of 6/3/20
1
9.A.1
Packet Pg. 810 Attachment: 2020 Project Priorities (12553 : Approve 2020 Priority Projects)
Rank Location Proposed Improvement Cost Estimate Status
1 16th Street NE, south of 10th Ave NE New Bridge Construction $8,000,000 CST $4.9 m SU/CM CST
FY22 FY21-25 TIP
2 47th Avenue NE, west of Everglades Boulevard New Bridge Construction $8,000,000 PD&E completed
3 Wilson Boulevard, south of 33rd Avenue NE New Bridge Construction $8,000,000
4 18th Ave NE, between Wilson Boulevard N and 8th Street NE New Bridge Construction $8,000,000
5 18th Ave NE, between 8th Street NE and 16th Street NE New Bridge Construction $8,000,000
6 13th Street NW, north end at proposed Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension New Bridge Construction $8,000,000
7 16th Street SE, south end New Bridge Construction $8,000,000
8 Wilson Boulevard South, south end New Bridge Construction $8,000,000
9 Location TBD, between 10th Avenue SE and 20th Avenue SE New Bridge Construction $8,000,000
10 62nd Avenue NE, West of 40th Street NE New Bridge Construction $8,000,000
*Collier County is in process of reviewing priorities established in the East of 951 Bridge Study (2008)
2020 Bridge Priorities - 2018 & 2019 priorities w/ funding status updated*
2
9.A.1
Packet Pg. 811 Attachment: 2020 Project Priorities (12553 : Approve 2020 Priority Projects)
PROJECT
RANKING Project Name
Submitting
Agency/
Jurisdiction
Current
Estimated
Project Costs Phase
Funding Status
Per Draft FY21-
25 TIP
1
Crayton Road & Harbour Drive
Intersection Improvements -
Roundabout
City of Naples 892,211$ CST FY24 FPN 4463171
2 ITS Fiber Optic and FPL Power
Infrastructure - 13 locations Collier County 273,725$ CST FY25 FPN 4462501
3 Travel Time Data Collection &
Performance Measurements Collier County 701,000$ CST FY25 FPN 4462511
4
Mooring Line Drive & Crayton
Road Intersection
Improvements - Roundabout
City of Naples 850,533$ PE FY25 FPN 4463172
(PE $126,000)
5
Golden Gate Parkway & US-41
Intersection Improvements (lane
restriping to add left turn lane
sb/eb US41)
City of Naples 1,366,107$ PE FY23;
ROW FY25
FPN 4464511
PE $270,000;
ROW $225,942
6 New- Updated School Flasher
System Collier County 354,250$ CST FY 23 FPN 4462521
7 New-Vehicle Count Station
Update - 31 locations Collier County 312,562$ CST FY25 FPN 4462541
8
Bicycle Detection Systems at 4
intersections: US41/Central
Ave, US41/3rd AveS; Park
Shore Drive/Crayton Rd: 8th St
S/3rd Ave S
City of Naples 67,429$ CST FY24 FPN 4462531
9
Adaptive Traffic Control
System - 13 intersections on
Santa Barbara & Golden Gate
Pkwy
Collier County 894,000$ PE FY 24
CST FY25 FPN 4463421
Total 5,711,817$
2020 Congestion Management Project Priorities (continuation of 2019 Priorities)
3
9.A.1
Packet Pg. 812 Attachment: 2020 Project Priorities (12553 : Approve 2020 Priority Projects)
Priority
Ranking
Requested
Funding / Project
Estimates *Location Description
1 $142,847.10 *Route 11 US41 Increase Frequency To Peak Service ‐ Add 2 Loops
2 $285,694.20 *Route 12 Airport Pulling Rd Increase Frequency To Peak Service ‐ Add 1 Loop
3 $222,723.60 *Route 19 Immokalee Increase Frequency To Morning Service ‐ Add 1 Loop
4 $428,541.30 *Route 15 Golden Gate Pkwy Increase Frequency To Peak Service ‐ Add 3 Loops
5 $334,085.40 *Route 25 Golden Gate Pkwy Add 2 Loops (Currently The Route Has A Gap During The Day)
6 $334,085.40 *Route 17 East Naples Extend Evening Service By 2 Loops
7 $167,042.70 *Route 11 US41 Extend Evening Service By 1 Loop
8 $222,723.60 *Route 28 Ave Maria & Immokalee Increase Frequency During The Day ‐ Add 1 Loop
9 $167,042.70 *Route 27 Collier Blvd & Immokalee Rd Extend Morning Service By 1 Loop
10 $606,975.00 *Route 13 City of Naples and Bayshore Increased Peak Service Frequency ‐ Add 4 Loop and Purchase a Bus
11 $5,000,000.00 8300 Radio Rd, Naples FL 34104 Maintenance Facility Rehabilitation for State of Good Repair and
enhancement
12 $250,000.00 Throughout Collier County Enhance accessibility to bus stops to meet American with Disabilities Act (ADA)
requirements ‐ 10 stops a year
13 $480,000.00 Throughout Collier County Construct 12 new bus shelters & amenities per year (bike rack, bench, trash
can, etc.)
14 $500,000.00 Throughout Collier County Purchase Replacement Bus
* Includes cost for 3 years of operation based on existing routes costs.
2020 Transit Priorities
4
9.A.1
Packet Pg. 813 Attachment: 2020 Project Priorities (12553 : Approve 2020 Priority Projects)
Collier MPO Priorities for Highway Projects from 2040 LRTP
and MPO Priority Safety Projects
Phase Source YOE Cost FPN Phase Source FY Amount
PE OA $590,000
CST OA $2,540,000
PE OA $800,000
CST OA $6,350,000 4452962 CST DI 2023 $5,450,000
PE OA $3,600,000 4464121 PE LF, CIGP 2024 $3,200,000
CST OA $38,100,000
PE OA $510,000
CST OA $3,490,000
12 Old US 41 US 41 (SR 45)Lee/Collier County
line Add Lanes and Reconstruct 1.5 $15,030,000 2026-2030 PE OA $2,720,000
FDOT PD&E, FPN
4353471 Collier,
4351101 Lee MPO
19a
Critical Needs
Intersection
(Randall Blvd at
Immokalee Rd)
Immokalee Rd 8th Street Interim At-Grade Improvements,
including 4 laning 8th Street $4,000,000 2021-2025 CST OA $5,080,000 funded with County
Sales Surtax
PE OA $370,000
CST OA $2,542,000
41 SR 951 (Collier
Blvd)
South of Manatee
Rd North of Tower Rd 4 to 6 lane roadway 1 $13,350,000 2026-2030 PE OA $2,020,000 4351112 ROW,RRU,
CST
DDR, DS,
LF, DIH
2021 &
2024 $17,341,882
Subtotal $74,130,000 Subtotal $25,991,882
LRTP Facility Limit From Limit To Project Description Miles Total Project
Cost (PDC)Time Frame Phase Source Funding
Request FPN Phase Source FY Amount
n/a Corkscrew Rd
(north section)
750 Feet South of
Wildcat Drive
1200 Feet East of
Wildcat Drive
Increase curve radius & widen 10'
lanes to 11'0.552 $1,400,000 2020 CST OA, SU $700,000 4463231 CST GRSU, LF 2021 $1,478,586
n/a Corkscrew Rd
(south section)Lee County Curve Collier County
Proposed Curve
Widen Lanes from 10' -11', Add 2
'- shoulders both sides 1.005 $1,200,000 2020 CST OA, SU $600,000 4463232 CST SU 2024 $1,321,000
Subtotal Corkscrew Rd $2,600,000 $1,300,000 $2,799,586
Phase Source YOE Cost FPN Phase Source FY Amount
PE OA $6,010,000 4156213
PD&E completed
2008 CST OA 26-30 Pending
from FDOT
PROJECT STATUS Including Projects Funded in Draft FY2021-25 TIP
$21,830,000 2026-2030 TBD5US 41/Tamiami
Trail Greenway Rd 6 L Farm Rd 2-lane roadway to 4 lanes with
outside shoulder paved
Construction
Time Frame
5-Year Window in which CST is Funded by Source
2026-2030
YOE
Final Proposed Improvement -
2040 LRTP
Link in
Miles
Total Project
Cost (PDC)Facility Limit From Limit To
LRTP Priority RankingHIGHWAY PRIORITIES 2020 (updated status of 2019 List, added new 5-yr in 2040 CFP)
Intersection Traffic Signalization $5,000,000 3 Pine Ridge Rd I-75 Interchange
Projects Funded
in CFP
YOE
I-75 Interchange
2 LRTP Priority RankingEastbound on-ramp - New 2 lane
Ramp $2,000,000
Final Proposed Improvement -
2040 LRTP
Link in
Miles Facility Limit From Limit To
Golden Gate
Parkway 2021-2025 $3,130,000
2021-25
Construction
Time Frame
5-Year Window in which CST is Funded by Source
I-75 Interchange I-75 Interchange
Total Project
Cost (PDC)
$1,400,000
$1,200,000
HIGHWAY SAFETY
YOE
$2,000,000 2021-2025 $2,912,000
$22,050,000
Immokalee Rd I-75 Interchange I-75 Interchange Intersection Traffic Signalization $2,750,000 2021-2025 $4,000,000
CR 951 (Collier
Blvd)
Golden Gate
Canal Green Blvd 4 to 6 lane roadway
2021-2025 $7,150,000
FDOT Traffic
Analysis &
Modeling
21 US 41 Goodlette Rd N/A Intersection Improvements
$5,080,000
2.0 $30,000,000 2021-2025 $41,700,000
7
5
5
9.A.1
Packet Pg. 814 Attachment: 2020 Project Priorities (12553 : Approve 2020 Priority Projects)
Priority Fiscal Year Project Cost Plan or Study
1 2020/21 600,000$ 2045 LRTP
1 2024/25 600,000$ 2050 LRTP
2020 Planning Study Priorities
9.A.1
Packet Pg. 815 Attachment: 2020 Project Priorities (12553 : Approve 2020 Priority Projects)
Joint TRIP Priorities for Lee and Collier
2020
Sponsor Route From To Proposed
Improvement
Requested
Phase Total Cost Requested
TRIP Funds
Staff
Priority
Order
State Funding
Level Fiscal Year
(1)
Utilizing or
relieveing
an SIS
Facility
(2)
SIS
Connectiv
ity
(3)
County
Enterprise
Zones, Rural
Area
(4)
Corridor
Managemen
t
Techniques
(5)
Production
Readiness
(6)
TRIP
Funding
Not
Receive
(7)
Job
Access
and
Economic
(8)
Peformance
on Previous
TRIP Projects
(9)
Overmatc
h
(10)
Public Private-
Partnerships Total
Points
Lee County Corkscrew Road E.of Ben Hill Griffin Bella Terra 2L to 4L CST $23,590,800 $6,975,000 Funded $ 2,651,966 FY 20/21 3 3 0 3 5 0 4 2 1 0 21
Lee County Three Oaks Ext.New 4L CST $20,900,000 $4,000,000 3 0 0 3 5 0 4 2 1 0 18
Lee County Ortiz Colonial Blvd SR 82 2L to 4L CST $20,025,000 $5,000,000 0 1 2 3 5 0 4 2 1 0 18
Lee County Three Oaks Ext.Fiddlesticks Canal Pony Drive New 4L CST $20,930,000 $5,000,000 0 0 0 3 5 0 4 2 1 0 15
Lee County Corkscrew Road Bella Terra Alico Road 2L to 4L CST $17,795,300 $4,500,000 3 3 0 3 5 0 4 2 1 0 21
Lee County Three Oaks Ext.Pony Drive Daniels Parkway New 4L CST $31,720,000 $7,500,000 3 0 0 3 5 0 4 2 3 0 20
Collier County Veterans Memorial Boulevard High School Entrance US 41 New 4L CST $13,400,000 $6,000,000 3 0 0 3 5 0 4 2 1 0 18
Collier County Goodlette Road Vanderbilt Beach Road Immokalee Road CST $5,500,000 $2,750,000 Funded $ 2,750,000 FY 23/24 3 0 0 3 5 0 4 2 1 0 18
Lee County Burnt Store Rd Van Buren Pkwy Charlotte Co/L 2L to 4L PE $8,320,000 $4,100,000 3 3 0 3 1 0 4 2 1 0 17
Collier County Vanderbilt Beach Rd 16th Street Everglades Blvd New 2L CST $8,250,000 $4,125,000 3 0 3 3 5 0 4 2 1 0 24
Collier County Collier Blvd Golden Gate Main
Canal Golden Gate Pkwy 4L to 6L CST $33,000,000 $5,000,000 3 3 0 3 5 0 4 2 3 0 23
Collier County Oil Well Road Everglades Oil Well Grade Rd. 2L to 6L CST $31,400,000 $15,700,000 3 1 3 3 5 0 4 2 1 0 22
Collier County Santa Barbara/Logan Blvd.Painted Leaf Lane Pine Ridge Road Operational Imp.CST $8,000,000 $4,000,000 3 0 0 3 5 0 4 2 1 0 18
Collier County Vanderbilt Beach Rd US 41 E. of Goodlette 4L to 6L CST $8,428,875 $4,214,438 Funded $ 4,214,438 FY 24/25 3 0 0 3 5 0 4 2 1 0 18
2024/2025
2022/2023
2020/2021
2021/2022
2023/2024
Fiddlesticks Canal Crossing
7
9.A.1
Packet Pg. 816 Attachment: 2020 Project Priorities (12553 : Approve 2020 Priority Projects)
06/12/2020
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Approve Collier County National Highway System (NHS) Justification Report and SR 82 NHS
Justification Report
OBJECTIVE: For the Board to approve the Collier County NHS Justification Report and SR 82 NHS
Justification Report.
CONSIDERATIONS: Two reports were recently published by the Florida Department of Transportation
(FDOT) District One which provide justification for modifications to the National Highway System
(NHS). This justification package requests de-designation of three segments from NHS designation as
NHS Intermodal Connectors as well as the addition of one segment to NHS designation as an NHS
Principal Arterial, as described in Table 1. The proposed revision is made using the guidelines and
procedures available on the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) web site.
Table 1: Proposed NHS Addition/Deletions
Roadway
ID
Roadway Name From From
MP
To To MP Current
NHS
Designation
Requested
NHS
Designation
Change
03000010 North Road Terminal Drive 0.000 Airport Pulling
Road
0.515 NHS IC(1) None
03003000 Airport Pulling
Road
North Road 1.313 Pine Ridge Road 5.835 NHS IC(1) None
03504000 Pine Ridge Road Airport Pulling
Road
1.467 I-75 3.643 NHS IC(1) None
03050000 SR 82 Hendry/Collier
County Line
0.000 Gator Slough
Lane
4.008 None NHS PA(2)
Gator Slough
Lane
4.008 SR 29 7.058 None NHS PA(2)
(1) IC - Intermodal Connector; (2) PA - Principal Arterial
North Road/Airport Pulling Road/Pine Ridge Road
Interstate 75 (I-75) which runs north-south to the east of the Naples Airport (APF) and US 41 (Tamiami
Trail) which runs north-south to the west of APF, are the two major corridors within the vicinity of the
APF. I-75 and US 41 (Tamiami Trail) both are designated NHS corridors. APF is connected to I -75 via
NHS Intermodal Connectors listed below:
• North Road from Terminal Drive to Airport Pulling Road
• Airport Pulling Road from North Road to Pine Ridge Road
• Pine Ridge Road from Airport Pulling Road to I-75
The proposed revision is made using the guidelines and procedures available on the Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA) web site. APF has not met the NHS requirements for an intermodal facility for
the past five years, totaling 2,212 enplanements in 2018. The proposed de-designations of three segments
(listed above) from NHS designation as NHS Intermodal Connectors would streamline the existing NHS
system by removing links that no longer meet the required criteria.
9.B
Packet Pg. 817
06/12/2020
Figure 1 : North Road/Airport Pulling Road/Pine Ridge Road
Proposed NHS De-designation
SR 82
SR 82, currently functionally classified as a principal arterial, is proposed to be added to the NHS from
SR 739 to SR 29, extending beyond Lee County into Hendry and Collier Counties. The portion of SR 82
from I-75 to SR 29 is designated as a Strategic Intermodal Connector (SIS) Highway corridor by FDOT.
The ends of the proposed addition (SR 739 to the west and SR 29 to the east) are both currently
designated as NHS principal arterials. SR 82 serves as a major freight transportation route, connecting
Lee. Hendry and Collier Counties. SR 82, from SR 739 to SR 29 meets NHS guidance criteria and is
recommended by FDOT for NHS designation.
Figure 2: SR 82 Proposed NHS Addition
9.B
Packet Pg. 818
06/12/2020
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: The Technical Advisory Committee and Citizens Advisory
Committee voted to endorse the modifications at their (virtual) meetings held on May 18, 2020.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the Board approve the Collier County NHS Justification Report
and the SR 82 Justification Report recommending to the FHWA the proposed addition of SR 82 to the
NHS and de-designations of three segments from NHS designation as NHS Intermodal Connectors.
Prepared By: Anne McLaughlin, MPO Director
ATTACHMENT(S)
1. Collier County NHS justification Report, FDOT (PDF)
2. SR 82 NHS Justification Report, FDOT (PDF)
3. FDOT Powerpoint Presentation (PPTX)
9.B
Packet Pg. 819
06/12/2020
COLLIER COUNTY
Metropolitan Planning Organization
Item Number: 9.B
Doc ID: 12554
Item Summary: Approve Collier County National Highway System (NHS) Justification Report
and SR 82 NHS Justification Report
Meeting Date: 06/12/2020
Prepared by:
Title: – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Karen Intriago
06/03/2020 11:11 AM
Submitted by:
Title: Executive Director - MPO – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Anne McLaughlin
06/03/2020 11:11 AM
Approved By:
Review:
Metropolitan Planning Organization Brandy Otero MPO Analyst Review Completed 06/03/2020 8:01 PM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin MPO Executive Director Review Completed 06/04/2020 8:19 AM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin Meeting Pending 06/12/2020 9:00 AM
9.B
Packet Pg. 820
9.B.1
Packet Pg. 821 Attachment: Collier County NHS justification Report, FDOT (12554 : Approve Collier County National Highway System (NHS) Justification
i
Table of Contents
1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................... 1
1.1 Background ......................................................................................................................................................... 1
2 FHWA Evaluation Criteria............................................................................................................................................ 4
3 Conclusion.................................................................................................................................................................... 7
List of Tables
Table 1: Proposed NHS Additions/Modifications ................................................................................................................ 1
Table 2: Naples Airport Annual Enplanements ................................................................................................................... 3
Table 3: Summary of Proposed Intermodal Connectors for Naples Airport ...................................................................... 5
Table 4: North Road Cargo Data .......................................................................................................................................... 6
Table 5: APF Annual Total Enplanements ........................................................................................................................... 7
List of Figures
Figure 1: Project Location Map ............................................................................................................................................ 2
9.B.1
Packet Pg. 822 Attachment: Collier County NHS justification Report, FDOT (12554 : Approve Collier County National Highway System (NHS) Justification
1
1 Introduction
This report provides justification for modifications to the National Highway System (NHS) proposed by the Florida
Department of Transportation (FDOT) District One, Collier MPO, and Collier County. This justification package requests
NHS de-designation for three corridors. All proposed revisions were made using the guidelines and procedures
available on the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) web site. Table 1 lists the corridors for which NHS de-
designation is requested.
Table 1: Proposed NHS Modifications
Roadway
ID Roadway Name From From
MP To To
MP
Current
NHS
Designation
Requested
NHS
Designation
03000010 North Road Terminal Drive 0.000 Airport Pulling Road 0.515 NHS IC (1) None
03003000 Airport Pulling Road North Road 1.313 Pine Ridge Road 5.835 NHS IC (1) None
03504000 Pine Ridge Road Airport Pulling Road 1.467 I-75 3.643 NHS IC (1) None
(1) IC - Intermodal Connector
The following subsection 1.1 provides the background into the basis of this justification report including the authority
provided by the federal government to the state to propose modifications, as well as the methodology used for
justification by the state in accordance with applicable federal law.
1.1 Background
According to Section 470.107 – Federal -aid highway systems of the Federal -Aid Policy Guide:
The National Highway System shall consist of interconnected urban and rural arterials and highways
(including toll facilities) which serve major population centers, international border crossings, ports, airports,
public transportation facilities, other intermodal facilities and other major travel destinations; meet national
defense requirements; and serve interstate and regional travel. All routes on the Interstate System are part of
the National Highway System.
In addition, States can propose modifications to the National Highway System (NHS) and authorizes the Secretary of
the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) to approve such modifications provided they meet the criteria established
for the NHS and enhance the characteristics of the NHS.
The Naples Airport (APF) is located within the city limits of the City of Naples, in Collier County, Florida. Figure 1
illustrates the APF location and the roadway network surrounding it.
9.B.1
Packet Pg. 823 Attachment: Collier County NHS justification Report, FDOT (12554 : Approve Collier County National Highway System (NHS) Justification
41
75
Pine Ridge Rd.Pine Ridge Rd.
Green Blvd.Green Blvd.
Radio Rd.Radio Rd.
North Rd.North Rd.Golden Gate Pkwy.Golden Gate Pkwy.Livingston Rd.Livingston Rd.Santa Barbara Blvd.Santa Barbara Blvd.Sunshine Blvd.Sunshine Blvd.Airport-Pulling Rd.Airport-Pulling Rd.Goodlette-Frank Rd.Goodlette-Frank Rd.Tamiami Tr. N.Tamiami Tr. N.Figure 1
Naples Airport Intermodal ConnectorProposed NHS De-designationN
N.T.S.
Source: Google Earth
Naples Airport
9.B.1
Packet Pg. 824 Attachment: Collier County NHS justification Report, FDOT (12554 : Approve Collier County National
3
APF has been in place since the 1940s, however, it was used for military purposes at that time. As the airport was not
deemed necessary after the war, the property was returned to the City of Naples and Collier County. Collier County
sold its interests in the airport to the City of Naples in 1958. Since 2008, APF has not seen significant growth, with
annual enplanements fluctuating every year. Table 2 shows the historical enplanements at APF starting in 2008.
Table 2: Naples Airport Annual Enplanements
Year Total
Enplanements
Percent
change
2008 3,316
2009 514 -84.5%
2010 581 13.04%
2011 239 -58.86%
2012 687 187.45%
2013 2,333 239.59%
2014 874 -62.54%
2015 110 -87.41%
2016 1,337 1,115.45%
2017 505 -62.23%
2018 2,212 338.02%
APF experienced increasing traffic from the 1960s to the mid-1980s . With the opening of Southwest Florida
International Airport in Fort Myer s, APF has experienced reduction in annual enplanements. Several airlines ceased
operations beginning in 2001 and the final scheduled commercial service was eliminated in 2017 due to low demand.
APF currently serves general aviation aircraft, charter airlines, flight training, fire/rescue services, mosquito control,
and the Collier County Sheriff’s Aviation Unit, among other community services . Naples Airport is designated by
National Plan of Integrated Airport Systems (NPIAS) as a “General Aviation Airport” and has held this designation since
2013 (based on historical NPIAS reports). Before 2013, APF was classified as a “Non-Primary Commercial Service
Airport.”
Interstate 75 (I-75) which runs north-south to the east of APF and US 41 (Tamiami Trail) which runs north-south to the
west of APF, are the two major corridors within the vicinity of the APF. I-75 and US 41 (Tamiami Trail) are designated
NHS corridors. APF is connected to I-75 via NHS Intermodal Connectors listed below:
• North Road from Terminal Drive to Airport Pulling Road
• Airport Pulling Road from North Road to Pine Ridge Road
• Pine Ridge Road from Airport Pulling Road to I-75
9.B.1
Packet Pg. 825 Attachment: Collier County NHS justification Report, FDOT (12554 : Approve Collier County National Highway System (NHS) Justification
4
2 FHWA Evaluation Criteria
According to Section 103(b), of Title 23, U.S.C., States must ensure that any facilities recommended for addition to the
NHS satisfy the criteria stated in Appendix D of Section 103(b), of Title 23, U.S.C. Below are the nine criteria to be
addressed, and their respective justifications.
1) Proposed additions to the NHS should be included in either an adopted State or Metropolitan
transportation plan or program.
This criterion is not applicable.
2) Proposed additions should connect at each end with other routes on the NHS or serve as a
major traffic generator.
This criterion is not applicable.
3) Proposals should be developed in consultation with local and regional officials.
Throughout the preparation of this proposal, the state has coordinated with local officials on multiple occasions to
ensure consensus regarding the proposed NHS de-designation. Please see the NHS documentation attached in
Appendix A.
4) Proposals to add routes to the NHS should include information on the type of service served
(i.e. percent of trucks, average trip lengths, local, commuter, interregional, interstate) by the
route, the population centers or major traffic generators served by the route, and how this
service compares to existing NHS routes.
Table 3 below shows the identifying information for the three segments recommended for de-designation from the
NHS.
9.B.1
Packet Pg. 826 Attachment: Collier County NHS justification Report, FDOT (12554 : Approve Collier County National Highway System (NHS) Justification
5
Table 3: Summary of Existing Intermodal Connectors for Naples Airport
Street Name From To # Lanes 2019 AADT T Factor (%)
North Road Terminal
Drive
Airport Pulling
Road 2 2,000 4.90%
Airport
Pulling Road North Road Pine Ridge
Road 6 48,500 5.60%
Pine Ridge
Road
Airport
Pulling Road I-75 6 58,000 4.90%
The identified segments serve similar amounts of truck traffic, however, the amount of truck traffic heading to the airport
is minimal as indicated by the low counts along North Road which provides a direct connection to the airport.
5) Proposals should include information on existing and anticipated needs and any planned
improvements to the route.
The only planned improvement along this NHS corridor is an interchange improvement project at the interchange of
Pine Ridge Road and I-75. The proposed interchange project would include a Diverging Diamond Interchange (DDI).
This improvement is included as part of Collier MPO’s 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan.
In addition, the FDOT work program shows PD&E study (FM # 445296-1) for the interchange of I-75 and Pine Ridge
Road in FY 2020 with planned construction for FY 2023 (FM # 445296-2). Collier MPO Transportation Improvement
Program (TIP) identifies a corridor improvement project along Pine Ridge Road between Livingston Road and I-75
(Project # 60201). This project includes the intersection improvements at Livingston Road and Whippoorwill Lane.
6) Proposals should include information concerning the possible effects of adding or deleting
a route to or from the NHS might have on other existing NHS routes that are in close proximity.
The de-designation of the proposed roadway segments to NHS does not affect the existing NHS routes (I-75 and U.S.
41) since it exists only to provide a connection between APF and I-75.
9.B.1
Packet Pg. 827 Attachment: Collier County NHS justification Report, FDOT (12554 : Approve Collier County National Highway System (NHS) Justification
6
7) Proposals to add routes to the NHS should include an assessment of whether modifications
(adju stments or deletions) to existing NHS routes, which provide similar services may be
appropriate.
This criterion is not applicable.
8) Proposed modifications that might affect adjoining States should be developed in
cooperation with those states.
The proposed modifications neither connects to nor affect adjoining states.
9) Proposed modifications consisting of connectors to major intermodal facilities should be
developed using the criteria set forth. These criteria were used for identifying initial NHS
connection s to major intermodal terminals.
The FHWA primary criteria which must be met by a commercial aviation airport to achieve eligibility for an NHS
intermodal connector are as follows:
• Passengers – scheduled commercial service with more than 250,000 annual enplanements.
OR
• Cargo – 100 trucks per day in each direction on the principle connecting route, or 100,000 tons per year
arriving or departing by highway mode.
Table 4 below shows the cargo data for the principle connecting route for APF.
Table 4: North Road Cargo Data
Criteria Value Meets NHS Criteria?
Trucks per day in each direction 49* No
Tons per year along route Unavailable N/A
* Approximate value based on 20 19 traffic counts.
9.B.1
Packet Pg. 828 Attachment: Collier County NHS justification Report, FDOT (12554 : Approve Collier County National Highway System (NHS) Justification
7
Table 5 below shows the APF enplanements for the last available five years.
Table 5: APF Annual Total Enplanements
Year Enplanements Meets NHS Criteria?
2013 2,333 No
2014 874 No
2015 110 No
2016 1,337 No
2017 505 No
2018 2,212 No
As can be seen in Table 5, APF has not met the NHS requirements for an intermodal facility for the past five years,
totaling 2,212 enplanements in 2018.
3 Conclusion
The Naples Airport does not meet the FHWA’s enplanements criteria for major intermodal facility. The proposed de-
designations would streamline the existing NHS system by r emoving links that no longer meet the required criteria.
9.B.1
Packet Pg. 829 Attachment: Collier County NHS justification Report, FDOT (12554 : Approve Collier County National Highway System (NHS) Justification
8
Appendix A: Multi-Agency Coordination with
Local and Regional Officials
9.B.1
Packet Pg. 830 Attachment: Collier County NHS justification Report, FDOT (12554 : Approve Collier County National Highway System (NHS) Justification
9.B.2
Packet Pg. 831 Attachment: SR 82 NHS Justification Report, FDOT (12554 : Approve Collier County National Highway System (NHS) Justification Report and
i
Table of Contents
1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 1
1.1 Background ................................................................................................................................... 1
1.2 SR 82 .............................................................................................................................................. 1
1.3 FHWA Evaluation Criteria .............................................................................................................. 2
2 Justification Statement ......................................................................................................................... 5
List of Tables
Table 1: SR 82 Roadway Information ............................................................................................................................ 2
Table 2: Summary of Programmed and Planned Improvements along S.R. 82 ............................................................. 4
List of Figures
Figure 1: S.R. 82 Location Map ..................................................................................................................................... 6
9.B.2
Packet Pg. 832 Attachment: SR 82 NHS Justification Report, FDOT (12554 : Approve Collier County National Highway System (NHS) Justification Report and
1
1 Introduction
This report provides justification for modifications to the National Highway System (NHS) requested in the latest update
proposed by the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) District One, Lee County, Hendry County, Collier
County, Lee County MPO, Heartland TPO, and Collier MPO. This justification package requests NHS designation for
SR 82 between SR 739 (Fowler Street) in Lee County and SR 29 in Collier County. The proposed revision is made
using the guidelines and procedures available on the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) web site.
The following subsection 1.1 will provide background into the basis of this justification report including the authority
provided by the federal government to the state to propose modifications, as well as the methodology used for
justification by the state in accordance with applicable federal law.
1.1 Background
According to Section 470.107 – Federal-aid highway systems of the Federal-Aid Policy Guide:
The National Highway System shall consist of interconnected urban and rural arterials and highways
(including toll facilities) which serve major population centers, international border crossings, ports, airports,
public transportation facilities, other intermodal facilities, and other major travel destinations; meet national
defense requirements; and serve interstate and regional travel. All routes on the Interstate System are part of
the National Highway System.
In addition, States can propose modifications to the National Highway System (NHS) and authorizes the Secretary of
the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) to approve such modifications provided they meet the criteria established
for the NHS and enhance the characteristics of the NHS.
1.2 SR 82
SR 82, is a tri-county corridor that runs east-west serving regional traffic between Lee, Hendry and Collier Counties.
The segment of SR 82 between SR 739/Fowler Avenue and I-75 is currently classified as a Principal Arterial,
and the segment of SR 82 between I-75 and SR 29 is classified as a Strategic Intermodal System (SIS) highway
corridor. Lee County MPO, identifies the segment of SR 82 between SR 739 and I-75 as a Tier Two Freight Facility
and the segment between I-75 and Hendry County Line as Tier One Freight Facility. The segment of 82
proposed for NHS addition has a functional classification of Principal Arterial and is owned and maintained by
FDOT. Table 1 below summarizes the roadway information for the proposed addition as well as ongoing construction
projects.
9.B.2
Packet Pg. 833 Attachment: SR 82 NHS Justification Report, FDOT (12554 : Approve Collier County National Highway System (NHS) Justification Report and
2
Table 1: SR 82 Roadway Information
Roadway
ID
State
Road From
From
MP To To MP County
Existing
Lanes UC/Lanes(1)
12070000
SR 82
SR 739 0.645 Michigan Link
Avenue 2.966
Lee
4 No
Michigan Link
Avenue 2.966 Ortiz Avenue 3.826 5 No
Ortiz Avenue 3.826 I-75 4.300 6 No
I-75 4.300 Colonial
Boulevard 6.874 6 No
Colonial
Boulevard 6.874 Shawnee Road 11.512 2 Yes/6
Shawnee Road 11.512 Alabama Road 14.696 2 Yes/6
Alabama Road 14.696 Homestead Road 17.891 2 Yes/4
Homestead Road 17.891 Hendry/Lee
County Line 21.551 2 Yes/4
07020000 Hendry/Lee
County Line 0.000 Hendry/Collier
County Line 1.275 Hendry 4 No
03050000
Hendry/Collier
County Line 0.000 Gator Slough
Lane 4.008
Collier
2 Yes/4
Gator Slough
Lane 4.008 SR 29 7.058 2 Yes/4
(1)UC – Under Construction; Lane - # of lanes after the construction is completed (programmed # of lanes)
1.3 FHWA Evaluation Criteria
According to Section 103(b), of Title 23, U.S.C., States must ensure that any facilities recommended for addition to the
NHS satisfy the criteria stated in Appendix D of Section 103(b), of Title 23, U.S.C. This subsection provides a general
evaluation of all proposed modifications contained in this report. Certain criteria require route-specific information (i.e.,
service type, traffic information, planned improvements, etc.) that will be provided independently in subsequent
sections.
1) Proposed additions to the NHS should be included in either an adopted State or Metropolitan
transportation plan or program.
The proposed addition SR 82 (SR 739 to SR 29) is part of FDOT’s State Highway System. Further, the segment of
SR 82 (I-75 to SR 29) is identified as a SIS highway corridor.
9.B.2
Packet Pg. 834 Attachment: SR 82 NHS Justification Report, FDOT (12554 : Approve Collier County National Highway System (NHS) Justification Report and
3
2)Proposed additions should connect at each end with other routes on the NHS or serve as a
major traffic generator.
The ends of the proposed addition (SR 739 to the west and SR 29 to the east) are both currently designated as NHS
principal arterials.
3)Proposals should be developed in consultation with local and regional officials.
Throughout the preparation of this proposal, the state has coordinated with Lee County, Hendry County, Collier
County, Lee County MPO, Heartland TPO, and Collier MPO officials on multiple occasions to ensure consensus
regarding the proposed NHS modifications. Please see the NHS documentation attached in Appendix A.
4)Proposals to add routes to the NHS should include information on the type of service served
(i.e. percent of trucks, average trip lengths, local, commuter, interregional, interstate) by the
route, the population centers or major traffic generators served by the route, and how this
service compares to existing NHS routes.
The AADT along SR 82 ranges from 48,100 veh/day along the western segment to 13,300 veh/day along the eastern
segment with a daily truck volume of about 3,780 trucks/day along the western segment to 1,537 trucks/day along the
eastern segment. According to the recent FDOT District One Freight Mobility Transportation Plan, Hendry and Collier
Counties rank among the top three counties in the harvesting of vegetable, tomatoes, and watermelons. In addition to
serving the regional traffic, SR 82 serves the freight traffic between the Freight Activity Centers located in Lee, Collier
and Hendry counties, Tradeport Area and Southwest Florida International Airport (Lee County), and Interstate-75.
SR 80 is the closest NHS route in the vicinity of SR 82 corridor. SR 80 runs east-west serving Lee, Hendry, Glades,
and Palm Beach County. SR 80 and SR 82 have similar characteristics; however, the alignment of SR 82 runs
southeast towards the east, separating SR 80 and SR 82 at SR 29 by approximately 20 miles.
9.B.2
Packet Pg. 835 Attachment: SR 82 NHS Justification Report, FDOT (12554 : Approve Collier County National Highway System (NHS) Justification Report and
4
5) Proposals sh ould include information on existing and anticipated needs and any planned
improvements to the route.
Table 2 lists the existing and programmed needs along the proposed addition.
Table 2: Summary of Programmed and Planned Improvements along SR 82
FM
Number Project Limits Work Summary Current Phase Programmed Lanes
438008-1 Rockfill Road to Ortiz
Avenue Resurfacing Construction
(Ongoing) NA
425841-1 C.R. 884/Lee Boulevard to
Shawnee Road
Add Lanes and
Reconstruct
Construction
(Ongoing) 6
425841-2 Shawnee Road to Alabama
Road S
Add Lanes and
Reconstruct
Construction
(Ongoing) 6
425841-3 Alabama Road S to
Homestead Road S
Add Lanes and
Reconstruct
Construction
(Ongoing) 4
425841-4 Homestead Road S to
Hendry C/L
Add Lanes and
Reconstruct
Construction
(Ongoing) 4
430848-1 Hendry C/L to Gator Slough
Lane
Add Lanes and
Reconstruct
Construction (FY
2023) 4
430849-1 Gator Slough Lane to SR 29 Add Lanes and
Reconstruct
Construction (FY
2020) 4
Source: FDOT Work Program (https://fdotewp1.dot.state.fl.us/fmsupportapps/WorkProgram/WorkProgram.aspx )
No additional needs are currently identified in the Lee County MPO 2040 Cost Feasible Plan, Heartland TPO 2040
Cost Feasible Plan and Collier MPO 2040 Cost Feasible Plan.
6) Proposals should include information concerning the possible effects of adding or del eting
a route to or from the NHS might have on other existing NHS routes that are in close proximity.
The proposed addition does not have any effect on the existing NHS routes. Rather, it enhances the NHS network by
improving the connectivity between the existing route and providing alternate NHS route for travel.
7) Proposals to add routes to the NHS should include an assessment of whether modifica tions
(adjustments or deletions) to existing NHS routes, which provide similar services may be
appropriate.
No further modification (adjustments or deletions) are proposed, in addition, to the proposed addition of SR 82 (SR 739
to SR 29).
9.B.2
Packet Pg. 836 Attachment: SR 82 NHS Justification Report, FDOT (12554 : Approve Collier County National Highway System (NHS) Justification Report and
5
8)Proposed modifications that might affect adjoining States should be developed in
cooperation with those states.
The proposed modification neither connects to nor affect adjoining states.
9)Proposed modifications consisting of connectors to major intermodal facilities should be
developed using the criteria set forth. These criteria were used for identifying initial NHS
connections to major intermodal terminals.
This is not applicable to the proposed modification.
2 Justification Statement
Adding this segment would enhance the national transportation characteristics of the NHS by two means. First, the
addition of this segment to the existing NHS connector provide additional routing in the NHS system. Second, the
addition of this segment will enhance connectivity of the local area by ensuring connections occur among existing NHS
routes and newly proposed NHS routes providing additional options for users. The justification and supporting
evidences were summarized as follows:
•The proposed NHS connector meets the guidance criteria for evaluating request for modifications to the
National Highway System.
•FDOT District One, Lee County, Hendry County, Collier County, Lee County MPO, Heartland TPO, and
Collier MPO supports the modification of adding this SR 82 segment (from SR 739/Fowler Avenue to SR 29)
to the NHS.
9.B.2
Packet Pg. 837 Attachment: SR 82 NHS Justification Report, FDOT (12554 : Approve Collier County National Highway System (NHS) Justification Report and
9.B.2
Packet Pg. 838 Attachment: SR 82 NHS Justification Report, FDOT (12554 : Approve Collier County National Highway
7
Appendix A: Multi-Agency Coordination with
Local and Regional Officials
9.B.2
Packet Pg. 839 Attachment: SR 82 NHS Justification Report, FDOT (12554 : Approve Collier County National Highway System (NHS) Justification Report and
NHS Modification in Collier County
9.B.3
Packet Pg. 840 Attachment: FDOT Powerpoint Presentation (12554 : Approve Collier County National Highway System
According to Section 470.107 –Federal-aid highway systems:
The National Highway Sy stem shall consist of interconnected urban and rural arterials and highways (including toll facilities)
which serve major population centers,international border crossings,ports,airports,public transportation facilities,other
intermodal facilities,and other major travel destinations;meet national defense requirements;and serve interstate and
regional travel.All routes on the Interstate Sy stem are part of the National Highway Sy stem.
What is the National Highway System (NHS)?
In addition,States can propose modifications to the
National Highway System (NHS)and authorizes the
Secretar y of the U.S.Depar tment of Tr ansportation
(DOT)to approve such modifications provided they
meet the criteria established for the NHS and enhance
the characteristics of the NHS.
9.B.3
Packet Pg. 841 Attachment: FDOT Powerpoint Presentation (12554 : Approve Collier County National Highway System
Proposed NHS Changes
Roadway Name From To Current NHS
Designation
Requested NHS
Designation
Nor th Road Te rminal Drive Airpor t Pulling Road NHS IC None
Airpor t Pulling Road Nor th Road Pine Ridge Road NHS IC None
Pine Ridge Road Airpor t Pulling Road I-75 NHS IC None
SR 82 Hendr y/Collier
County Line SR 29 None NHS PA
IC = Intermodal Connector PA = Principal Ar terial
9.B.3
Packet Pg. 842 Attachment: FDOT Powerpoint Presentation (12554 : Approve Collier County National Highway System
The Naples Airpor t does not meet the FHWA’s
250,000 annual enplanements criteria for major
intermodal facility.
Proposed NHS De-Designation
APF Total Enplanements
Ye ar Enplanements Meets NHS
Criteria?
2013 2,333 No
2014 874 No
2015 110 No
2016 1,337 No
2017 505 No
2018 2,212 No
9.B.3
Packet Pg. 843 Attachment: FDOT Powerpoint Presentation (12554 : Approve Collier County National Highway System
SR 82 between SR 739 (USB 41) in Lee County
to SR 29 in Collier County is proposed for NHS
Principal Ar terial designation.* SR 82 ser ves as a
major freight transpor tation route, connecting
Lee, Hendr y and Collier Counties.
Programmed Improvements
*SR 82 between I-75 in Lee County and SR 29 in Collier County is designated as a SIS Highway
corridor.
Proposed NHS Addition
Programmed Improvements
Roadway
ID Roadway Name Work Summary Current Phase Programmed
Lanes
430848-1 Hendry C/L to Gator
Slough Lane
Add Lanes and
Reconstruct
Construction
(FY 2023)4
430849-1 Gator Slough Lane
to SR 29
Add Lanes and
Reconstruct
Construction
(FY 2020)4
9.B.3
Packet Pg. 844 Attachment: FDOT Powerpoint Presentation (12554 : Approve Collier County National Highway System
Action Requested |Approval of the Modification to the NHS.
Yo ur approval will:
ü Assist FDOT in their recommendation to FHWA.
ü Enhance the NHS network connectivity within
Collier County and the region.
9.B.3
Packet Pg. 845 Attachment: FDOT Powerpoint Presentation (12554 : Approve Collier County National Highway System
06/12/2020
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Election of Representative to Serve on the Metropolitan Planning Organization Advisory Council
(MPOAC) Board for Remainder of Calendar Year 2020.
OBJECTIVE: For the MPO Board to elect a MPOAC representative to serve for the remainder of
calendar year 2020.
CONSIDERATIONS: The MPO Board elected Councilman Reg Buxton to serve as the MPO
representative on the MPOAC Governing Board for calendar year 2020. The alternate was
Commissioner William McDaniel. However, Councilman Buxton was not re-elected to the Naples City
Council and therefore is no longer a member of the MPO Board.
Commissioner McDaniel is willing to serve as the MPO representative for the remainder of 2020.
The tentative dates and locations for the remaining 2020 MPOAC meetings are:
July 30, 2020 Orlando, FL
October 29, 2020 Orlando, FL
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: For the MPO Board to elect a MPOAC representative to serve for the
remainder of calendar year 2020.
Prepared By: Anne McLaughlin, MPO Director
ATTACHMENT(S)
1. Email requesting Appointment of members to the MPOAC (PDF)
9.C
Packet Pg. 846
06/12/2020
COLLIER COUNTY
Metropolitan Planning Organization
Item Number: 9.C
Doc ID: 12556
Item Summary: Election of Representative to Serve on the Metropolitan Planning Organization
Advisory Council (MPOAC) Board for Remainder of Calendar Year 2020.
Meeting Date: 06/12/2020
Prepared by:
Title: – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Karen Intriago
06/03/2020 11:16 AM
Submitted by:
Title: Executive Director - MPO – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Anne McLaughlin
06/03/2020 11:16 AM
Approved By:
Review:
Metropolitan Planning Organization Brandy Otero MPO Analyst Review Completed 06/03/2020 11:59 AM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin MPO Executive Director Review Completed 06/03/2020 12:35 PM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin Meeting Pending 06/12/2020 9:00 AM
9.C
Packet Pg. 847
From:Mikyska, Carl
Subject:Appointment of members to the MPOAC
Date:Wednesday, January 08, 2020 5:17:34 PM
Dear MPOAC Staff Directors,
My apologies to each of you, in years past MPOAC has sent a memo out in early December
requesting your annual appointments to the MPOAC Governing Board and Staff Directors’ Advisory
Committee. I did not send out a memo last month and impressively many of you automatically sent
your letters and/or emails appointing members to MPOAC for calendar year 2020. As a reminder
MPOAC does need your appointments to the MPOAC Governing Board and Staff Directors for
calendar year 2020. This is a requirement of the MPOAC bylaws. Each MPO may submit a member
and up to two alternates (a primary alternate and a secondary alternate) for both the MPOAC
Governing Board and the Staff Directors’ Advisory Committee. Submittals must be in writing
whether that be a formal letter or an email to me.
If you have submitted your appointments to MPOAC, please do so quickly as we will need these to
seat individuals at the January 30th MPOAC Meeting. I thank you for your assistance in completing
this effort.
Sincerely,
Carl Mikyska, Executive DirectorMPOAC605 Suwannee Street, MS 28BTallahassee, FL 32399-0450
carl.mikyska@mpoac.org
850/414-4062
9.C.1
Packet Pg. 848 Attachment: Email requesting Appointment of members to the MPOAC (12556 : Election of Representative to Serve on the Metropolitan
06/12/2020
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Appointment of Representative to Multi-use Corridors of Regional Economic Significance (M-
CORES) Southwest Central Florida Connector Task Force (SCFC)
OBJECTIVE: To appoint a representative to the M-CORES-SCFC Task Force.
CONSIDERATIONS: The MPO Board elected Councilman Reg Buxton to serve as the MPO
representative on the M-CORES SCFC Task Force in September 2019. Commissioner Donna Fiala was
elected to serve as his alternate. However, Councilman Buxton was not re -elected to the Naples City
Council and therefore is no longer a member of the MPO Board, and Commissioner Fiala does not wish
to serve as either the primary or alternate going forward. Ms. McLaughlin, MPO Director, is serving in
the interim and will give a brief report on the SCFC webinar held on June 11, 2020. Commissioner
Taylor is representing the Board of County Commissioners on the Task Force and Commissioner
William McDaniel is representing the Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council.
The Task Force’s final report is due to the Governor and Legislature by October 1, 2020. The remaining
meetings are:
Date Meeting Time Location
June 24, 2020 Webinar 9:30 am-12:00 pm On-line
July 15, 2020 Meeting 10 am - 4 pm Agricultural Civic Center, Wauchula, FL 33873
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: n/a
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: For the Board to appoint a representative to the M-CORES-SCFC
Task Force.
Prepared By: Anne McLaughlin, Executive Director
9.D
Packet Pg. 849
06/12/2020
COLLIER COUNTY
Metropolitan Planning Organization
Item Number: 9.D
Doc ID: 12557
Item Summary: Appointment of Representative to Multi-use Corridors of Regional Economic
Significance (M-CORES) Southwest Central Florida Connector Task Force (SCFC)
Meeting Date: 06/12/2020
Prepared by:
Title: – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Karen Intriago
06/03/2020 11:18 AM
Submitted by:
Title: Executive Director - MPO – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Anne McLaughlin
06/03/2020 11:18 AM
Approved By:
Review:
Metropolitan Planning Organization Brandy Otero MPO Analyst Review Completed 06/03/2020 11:58 AM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin MPO Executive Director Review Completed 06/03/2020 12:36 PM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin Meeting Pending 06/12/2020 9:00 AM
9.D
Packet Pg. 850
06/12/2020
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment
OBJECTIVE: For the Board to approve the Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment.
CONSIDERATIONS: The MPO canceled the March and April committee meetings due to the COVID-
19 pandemic, and in their place, distributed documents to committee members and the public to review
via email and the MPO website. The mandatory minimum 45-day public comment was met as of May 22,
2020. Comments from two members of the public have been received to-date, as noted in Appendix H of
the PPP.
The revisions are shown in Track Changes on Attachment 1. The clean version of the amended PPP is
shown in Attachment 2. The revisions address comments received from the Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA) regarding civil rights, statutory language and references to federal land
management agencies, emergency public involvement provisions related to the COVID -19 pandemic, and
minor corrections to the Transportation Disadvantaged Standard Operating Procedures. Staff will provide
a brief overview of the changes at the Board meeting.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the Board approve the Public Participation Plan amendment with
the understanding that MPO staff will conduct a final review in order to correct typos, grammatical errors
and other non-substantive clean-up items.
Prepared By: Anne McLaughlin, MPO Director
ATTACHMENT(S)
1. Amended PPP – Track Changes (PDF)
2. Amended PPP – Clean Version (PDF)
9.E
Packet Pg. 851
06/12/2020
COLLIER COUNTY
Metropolitan Planning Organization
Item Number: 9.E
Doc ID: 12559
Item Summary: Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment
Meeting Date: 06/12/2020
Prepared by:
Title: – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Karen Intriago
06/03/2020 11:25 AM
Submitted by:
Title: Executive Director - MPO – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Anne McLaughlin
06/03/2020 11:25 AM
Approved By:
Review:
Metropolitan Planning Organization Brandy Otero MPO Analyst Review Completed 06/03/2020 7:54 PM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin MPO Executive Director Review Completed 06/04/2020 8:17 AM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin Meeting Pending 06/12/2020 9:00 AM
9.E
Packet Pg. 852
333
document
Collier MPO
2885 South Horseshoe Drive
Naples, FL 34104
(239) 252-5814
CollierMPO.com
Public Participation Plan
Scan the QR code with your
smartphone to visit our website.
Adopted February 8,
2019June 12, 2020
ADDITIONAL REVISIONS RELATED TO
CIVIL RIGHTS and COVID-19
EMERGENCY DRAFT 2020
AMENDMENT for SECOND 45-Day
Public Comment Period
The MPO’s Public Involvement Coordinator,
Anne McLaughlin, may be reached by phone at
239-252-5884, by cell at 239-919-4378, or by
email at: anne.mclaughlin@colliercountyfl.gov
9.E.1
Packet Pg. 853 Attachment: Amended PPP – Track Changes (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
1 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
COLLIER COUNTY METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION
2885 South Horseshoe Drive
Naples, Florida 34104
www.colliermpo.com
E-mail: colliermpo@colliergov.net
phone: 239-252-5814
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The preparation of this document has been financed in part through grants from the Federal Highway
Administration and the Federal Transit Administration, the U.S. Department of Transportation, under the
Metropolitan Planning Program, Section 104 (f) of Title 23, U.S. Code, and local funding. The contents of
this document do not necessarily reflect the official views or policy of the U.S. Department of
Transportation. Persons consulted with in the development of this Public Participation Plan (PPP) are
acknowledged at the end of the document.
TITLE VI AND RELATED LAWS
T The MPO does not discriminate against anyone on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, age, national
origin, disability or family status. For more information on the MPO’s commitment to equity and
nondiscrimination, or to express concerns visit https://www.colliermpo.org/get-involved/civil-
rights/www.mpocivilrightspage.com . Anyone requiring special accommodation under the Americans
with Disabilities Act or language interpretation services (free of charge) should contact Anne McLaughlin
at least ten (days) prior to the service date: annemclaughlin@colliercountyfl.gov - (239) 252-5884 -
Telerelay 711.
he MPO’s public participation is conducted in accordance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and
related statutes. Public participation in the MPO’s planning process is solicited without regard to race,
color, national origin, sex, age, disability, religion or family status. Persons requiring special
accommodations for MPO meetings or to participate in MPO activities under the Americans with
Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) should contact the MPO Executive Director, Anne McLaughlin at (239) 252-
5884 or annemclaughlin@colliergov.net
9.E.1
Packet Pg. 854 Attachment: Amended PPP – Track Changes (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
2 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
LEARNING FROM OUR COLLEAGUES
This document represents a significant departure from prior versions of Collier MPO’s Public Involvement
Plan adopted in 2013 and revised in 2015 and 2017. Staff reviewed Public Participation Plans produced by
other Florida MPOs to identify elements that were innovative and applicable to Collier MPO’s needs. This
PPP borrows a great deal of material from the Polk Transportation Planning Organization’s 2016 PPP.
Public Participation Plan (2016). Interested readers may wish to view the entire Polk TPO PPP at
www.polktpo.com
Collier MPO places a high value on public involvement. For questions
regarding public involvement and to learn more about how you can get
involved, contact the MPO office at (239) 252-5814.
You Can Make a Difference
There are several ways for you to help shape the future of transportation:
Become a member of Collier MPO’s Adviser Network Page 101
How to submit your comments to the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization Page 145
9.E.1
Packet Pg. 855 Attachment: Amended PPP – Track Changes (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
3 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
How to leave comments about a specific plan or study Page 167
Submit an application to serve on an MPO Advisory Committee Page 167
9.E.1
Packet Pg. 856 Attachment: Amended PPP – Track Changes (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
4 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….4
Guiding Principles………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………4
About Us……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………5
What is the Collier MPO Responsible For?.....................................................................................9
Our Planning Partners………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..9
Planning
Factors………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………121
Goals, Objectives and Performance
Measures…………………………………………………………………………132
Whom We Seek to Consult
With………………………………………………………………………………………………143
Having Your
Say……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….143
Getting
Involved………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………154
Access for
All……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………187
Outreach
Strategies………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….187
Evaluation………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………,……….22
1
Required
Notification……..………………………………………………………………………………………………………..221
Federal Compliance………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….26
FDOT MPO Handbook
Compliance………………………………………………………………………….……………….27Exceptions to
Notification Commitments…………………………………………………………………………………27
Additional Emergency Provisions for Public Involvement…………………………………………………………27
Federal Compliance………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….29
Commented [AM1]: Added to Table of Contents in
response to COVID-19 pandemic
9.E.1
Packet Pg. 857 Attachment: Amended PPP – Track Changes (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
5 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
FDOT MPO Handbook Compliance………………………………………………………………………….……………….34
Acronyms…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………38
1
APPENDICES
A. Government to Government Public Involvement
Policy……………………………………………….3340
B. Lee County MPO/Collier MPO Interlocal
Agreement…………………………………………………….3448
C. Limited English Proficiency
Plan……………………………………………………………………………………4551
D. Nondiscrimination Plan & Complaint
Process……………………………………………………………….593
E. Traditionally Underserved
Communities………………………………………………………………………5865
F. Standard Operating
Procedures……………………………………………………………………………………682
G. Persons Consulted With in Developing This
Plan……………………………………………………………8069
F.H. Public
Comments………………………………………………………………………………………………………….71
INTRODUCTION
The goal of the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization’s (MPO) Public Involvement Plan is to ensure
that all citizens regardless of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, age, disability, or familial status,
have an equal opportunity to participate in the MPO’s decision-making process. A 1994 Presidential
Executive Order directed every Federal agency to make Environmental Justice part of its mission by
identifying and addressing the effects of all programs, policies, and activities on "minority populations and
low-income populations." The MPO strives to accomplish this by involving the potentially affected public
in MPO outreach programs. MPO staff activities are designed to develop partnerships and enhance the
9.E.1
Packet Pg. 858 Attachment: Amended PPP – Track Changes (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
6 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
participation in the transportation planning process, with groups and individuals of “traditionally
underserved” communities. These communities include minorities, low income, the elderly, and persons
with disabilities. Staff activities include, but are not limited to, participation in groups serving these
communities, targeted communications with local media outlets, conducting meetings at convenient
times and in locations that are accessible to transit, when possible, and the publication of MPO documents
in non-technical, accessible formats when needed.
GUIDING PRINCIPLES
The Public Participation Plan (PPP) serves as a framework to the public involvement process in regard to
MPO planning related activities. The plan identifies federal, state and MPO requirements, PPP goals and
objectives, PPP policies, planning activities which require public involvement and the process involved
when providing the public with full access and notice to planning activities. The PPP incorporates the
following guiding principles into the development of any required transportation plans and programs:
Early and continuous public involvement opportunities throughout the planning and
programming process;
Timely information to citizens, affected public agencies, representatives of transportation
agencies, private sector transportation entities and other interested parties, including segments
of the community affected by transportation plans, programs, and projects;
Adequate public notice of public involvement activities and ample time for public review and
comment at key decision points;
Consideration of the needs of the traditionally underserved, including low-income and minority
citizens;
Periodic review of public involvement efforts by the MPO to ensure full and open access to all;
Review of public involvement procedures by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and
Federal Transit Administration (FTA) when necessary;
Coordination of MPO public involvement processes with statewide efforts whenever possible;
Reasonable public access to information; and
Consideration and reasonable response to public comments received.
ABOUT US
Established in 1982, the Collier MPO is a federally mandated transportation policy-making organization
composed of locally elected officials from Collier County, City of Naples, City of Marco Island, and the City
of Everglades City. The MPO is tasked to provide both the urban and rural areas of the County with a
Continuing, Cooperative, and Comprehensive (3-C) planning process to ensure that highways, transit,
bicycle, pedestrian and other facilities are properly considered within the context of the overall
transportation needs of the community.
9.E.1
Packet Pg. 859 Attachment: Amended PPP – Track Changes (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
7 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
The MPO staff reports directly to the MPO Board and provides information and technical assistance to the
advisory committees. On a regular basis the committees, along with the MPO staff, provide
recommendations to the MPO Board regarding short and long-range planning, implementation of
projects, and related issues. The MPO Board and each of its advisory committees operate under bylaws
approved by the MPO Board. The advisory committees include the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC),
Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC), Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC), Local
Coordinating Board (LCB) and the Congestion
Management Committee (CMC). Members of these
committees, various interested parties and citizens make
up the MPO Master Database of Contacts. The
committees review plans, documents and programs and
provide comments and recommendations during the
development of plans and major studies. Documents
presented to the MPO Board for approval, endorsement
or ratification have typically been reviewed by the TAC and
CAC.
The Collier MPO Board adopted new Vision and Mission statements in 2017. The MPO’s goal is to work
together with the public citizens of the Collier MPO planning area to fulfill the MPO’s Mission and Vision.
Vision Statement
The MPO strives to provide a fully integrated and multi-modal transportation system that safely and
efficiently moves people and goods while promoting economic development and protecting natural and
man-made regional assets.
Mission Statement
Provide transportation planning leadership through a collaborative effort to maintain a safe, efficient,
integrated, and multi-modal transportation system.
ABOUT THE REGION
The Collier MPO’s jurisdiction includes Collier County and the cities of Naples, Marco Island and Everglades
City.
9.E.1
Packet Pg. 860 Attachment: Amended PPP – Track Changes (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
8 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
Collier County has an estimated 2017 population of 356,774. The 2017 Median Household Income in
Collier County is $62,407 compared with $50,883 for the state of Florida as a whole. The 2017 Percent of
Households Below Poverty Level is 13% in Collier County, compared with 16% for Florida.1
All of Collier County - including the Cities of Naples, Marco Island, and Everglades City – experience a large,
seasonal increase in population and traffic between October and April, with the highest traffic volumes
occurring in the months of February and March. Collier County is expected to continue growing in
population. Approximately 77% of Collier County’s has a large land area is preserved under various
conservation mechanisms combined with State and Federal conservation lands, shown in green on the
map below. The conservation lands provide recreational opportunities and help sustain the natural
environment. They also constrain development.
1 2017 American Community Survey (ACS) 5-yr Estimates, Tables S0101, DP03, CP03
9.E.1
Packet Pg. 861 Attachment: Amended PPP – Track Changes (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
9 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
The protected lands to the southeast buffer Collier County somewhat from the intense traffic impacts and
pressures that interconnectivity with urban areas to the southeast. As a result, Collier County has a
minimal system of Federal Aid Eligible roadways, as shown on the map on the following page, which
somewhat constrains the availability of State and Federal funding for the MPO.
9.E.1
Packet Pg. 862 Attachment: Amended PPP – Track Changes (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
10 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
9.E.1
Packet Pg. 863 Attachment: Amended PPP – Track Changes (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
11 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
WHAT IS THE COLLIER MPO RESPONSIBLE FOR?
The Collier MPO is required under State and Federal laws to develop the following documents:
1. Long-Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) – updated every five years, required to address a
minimum time horizon of 20 years. The LRTP identifies needed improvements to the
transportation network and provides a long-term investment framework that addresses current
and future transportation needs. The LRTP must be multimodal and include, at a minimum,
roadway, bicycle and pedestrian and transit infrastructure improvements.
2. Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) – identifies transportation projects and priorities
that will be pursued over the next five years.
3. Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) – a two-year plan that identifies funding sources for
each MPO planning activity and a schedule of activities
4. Public Participation Plan (PPP) – provides a framework for public involvement in regard to
MPO planning related activities.
OUR PLANNING PARTNERS
MPO BOARD (BOARD)
The MPO Board establishes transportation policies and evaluates transportation needs for the area. The
Board is comprised of 9 elected officials, including all 5 County Commissioners, 2 City Council members
representing the City of Naples, 1 City Council member representing the City of Marco Island and 1 City
Council member representing Everglades City. The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) attends
and participates in all MPO Board meetings.
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (FDOT)
FDOT and the MPO work closely together and have a long-standing partnership. The majority of the MPO’s
funding comes through FDOT. The Department also provides guidance and assistance as needed and
informs the MPO of new or different requirements and practices.
STATE AND FEDERAL LAND MANAGEMENT AGENCIES
When developing the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Long Range Transportation Plan
(LRTP), the MPO consults with agencies and officials responsible for other planning activities within the
MPO’s jurisdiction that are affected by transportation, government agencies and non-profit organizations
that receive Federal assistance from a source other than that the US Department of Transportation to
provide non-emergency transportation services, Indian Tribal governments(s), State and Federal land
Management Agencies. For consultation with Tribal Governments, see section on Intergovernmental
Coordination Below. See P27 Requirements for Public Participation Plan for applicable code citations. The
9.E.1
Packet Pg. 864 Attachment: Amended PPP – Track Changes (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
12 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
MPO has added contact information for the following Federal and State agencies to the email distribution
list(s) to ensure their opportunity to participate in the development of the TIP and LRTP:
Federal Lands Management Agencies
• National Park Service (Everglades National Park and Big Cypress National Preserve)
• US Fish and Wildlife Service (Florida Panther National Wildlife Refuge, Ten Thousand Islands
National Wildlife Refuge)
State Land Management Agencies
• National Estuarine Research Reserve – Rookery Bay and Cape Romano – Ten Thousand Islands
Aquatic Preserve
• Collier-Seminole State Park
• Picayune Strand State Forest
• Fakahatchee Strand Preserve State Park
• Delnor-Wiggins Pass State Park
• Okaloacoochee Slough State Forest
• South Florida Water Management District
• Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission
Land Management Nonprofit Agencies
• National Audubon Society – Corkscrew Swamp Sanctuary
TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE (TAC)
The TAC is composed of professional staff of member entities. The TAC advises the MPO on technical
matters, promotes coordination among member agencies regarding transportation planning and
programming, reviews MPO products for technical sufficiency, accuracy and completeness, makes priority
recommendations for the LRTP, TIP, UPWP and provides technical analyses on other transportation
planning issues.
CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE (CAC)
The CAC advises the MPO by reviewing, reacting to, and providing comment on transportation planning
issues and needs from the citizens’ perspectives. The CAC consists of voting members appointed by the
MPO Board to represent various regions and jurisdictions, the disabled, minorities and groups having civic,
community and economic interests.
BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE (BPAC)
9.E.1
Packet Pg. 865 Attachment: Amended PPP – Track Changes (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
13 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
The BPAC provides citizen input on bicycle and pedestrian related issues within the community, advises
on developing a Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan that is responsive to the needs of the community,
recommends policies that will improve the walking and bicycling environment, recommend priorities for
bicycle and pedestrian projects and program implementation. Members are appointed by the MPO Board
to represent a broad cross-section of Collier County residents, neighborhoods and to include bike/ped
safety professions, transit riders, local advocacy groups, organizations that encourage active
transportation from a community health perspective and advocates for persons with disabilities and other
transportation disadvantaged populations.
CONGESTION MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE (CMC)
The CMC advises on technical matters related to updating the MPO’s Congestion Management Process
(CMP) and coordinating the CMP with regional Congestion Management System and Intelligent
Transportation System architecture. Members are professional staff appointed by the division,
department or agency they represent and one representative each from the TAC and CAC.
LOCAL COORDINATING BOARD (LCB) FOR TRANSPORTATION DISADVANTAGED
The LCB assists the MPO in identifying local service needs, providing information and direction to the
Community Transportation Coordinator (Board of County Commissioners) on the coordination of services.
Members on the LCB are appointed by designated planning agencies. The designated official planning
agency for Collier County is the MPO.
ADVISER NETWORK
Collier MPO established the Adviser Network in 2018 to serve as an additional mechanism for citizen
involvement with the objective of increasing participation by local residents who may not have the time
to participate on a standing committee. The MPO gathers contact information from participants at MPO-
sponsored public meetings and special events who express an interest in remaining informed of MPO
activities and wish to comment on MPO actions of specific interest to them. Members of the Adviser
Network have several options for participating in the MPO planning process, varying from interaction
through social media, responding to surveys, submitting comments, and viewing of videos to attendance
at community forums. Members are encouraged to participate on an as-desired basis as time allows and
their interest dictates.
INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION
The MPO adopted a Government to Government Public Involvement Policy effecting tribal entities in
June 2016. The policy is incorporated in the PPP as Appendix A.
9.E.1
Packet Pg. 866 Attachment: Amended PPP – Track Changes (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
14 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
The MPO has an Interlocal Agreement with Lee County MPO to coordinate regional transportation
planning. The Interlocal Agreement is incorporated in the PPP as Appendix B.
PLANNING FACTORS
The Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act, signed into law in December 2015, continued the
performance-based planning and public involvement requirements of prior transportation acts. It is likely
that future transportation appropriation acts will do likewise. However, to the extent that Planning
Factors change in the future, this section of the PPP will be updated to reflect them.
The FAST Act identifies ten planning factors the MPO must consider when developing its LRTP.
1. Support the economic vitality of the metropolitan area, especially by enabling global
competitiveness, productivity, and efficiency.
2. Increase the safety of the transportation system for motorized and non-motorized users.
3. Increase the security of the transportation system for motorized and non-motorized users.
4. Increase the accessibility* and mobility* of people and for freight.
5. Protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, improve the quality of life
and promote consistency between transportation improvements and state and local planned
growth and economic development patterns.
6. Enhance the integration and connectivity* of the transportation system, across and between
modes, for people and freight.
7. Promote efficient system management and operation.
8. Improve the resiliency and reliability of the transportation system and reduce or mitigate
stormwater impacts of the transportation system.
9. Emphasize the preservation of the existing transportation system.
10. Enhance travel and tourism.
*the following definitions help explain the use of these words in transportation planning:
Accessibility – the ability to reach a desired destination
Mobility – physical movement from one place to another, relates to the availability of different modes or
options for travel
Connectivity – the integration of transportation modes throughout the system
9.E.1
Packet Pg. 867 Attachment: Amended PPP – Track Changes (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
15 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES
PRIMARY GOAL: TO ACTIVELY ENGAGE A BROAD CROSS-SECTION OF THE PUBLIC
IN TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AND SERVE AS A SOURCE OF INFORMATION ON
MPO TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ACTIVITIES
OBJECTIVES
1. Maintain an up-to-date master database of contacts
2. Develop an Adviser Network
3. Broaden public awareness of, and active engagement with, the MPO
4. Develop a presence on social media
5. Develop an interactive website, conduct on-line surveys and invite on-line commentary
6. Receive input from a diverse cross-section of the community
7. Demonstrate effectiveness of public input
PERFORMANCE MEASURES
1. Contact Database - updated quarterly at a minimum
2. Adviser Network – track numbers of Advisers listed and attendance at community forums on an
annual basis
3. Public Awareness/Engagement – conduct annual on-line surveys
4. Social Media –establish a program and report on beginning levels of activities after year one
5. Interactive Website – track opportunities and participation numbers annually
6. Diversity – track and report on participation by demographics, businesses, NGO, civic groups
7. Effectiveness – track and report on changes that can be directly linked to public comments
SECONDARY GOAL: TO COMPLY WITH STATE AND FEDERAL REGULATIONS
OBJECTIVES
1. Identify regulatory requirements in PPP
2. Develop PPP to meet requirements.
PERFORMANCE MEASURES
1. FDOT review and concurrence
2. FDOT review and concurrence
9.E.1
Packet Pg. 868 Attachment: Amended PPP – Track Changes (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
16 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
WHOM WE SEEK TO CONSULT WITH
Tribal entities Regional planning partners
Public Agencies Minority communities
Business groups Public health organizations
Civic organizations Neighborhood/Homeowner Associations
Freight industry representatives Private transportation providers
Low-income communities Environmental groups
Tourism industry representatives Bicyclists and pedestrians
Representatives of the disabled Higher education institutions
Social service organizations Transit dependent persons
Organizations focused on aging Organizations focused on youth
Community & economic development
organizations
Workforce development organizations/agencies
HAVING YOUR SAY
The Collier MPO encourages public comments and provides the public with a variety of ways to voice their
opinions and share their ideas.
EARLY COORDINATION
The Adviser Network will have an opportunity to submit early comments and provide direction on the
development of major work products such as the LRTP, PPP, UPWP and TIP. The Adviser Network will also
have an opportunity to provide public input on transportation planning issues and subject areas prior to
the MPO actually beginning work on developing a specific plan. Comments and suggestions will be used
to guide the development of work products that will eventually go before the advisory committees and
MPO Board.
PUBLIC COMMENT PERIODS & NOTIFICATIONS
The primary opportunity for the public to share their thoughts and ideas occurs during public review and
comment periods as major plans are developed through the MPO’s planning process and reviewed at
regularly scheduled advisory committee and Board meetings. The public will have at least 30 days to
review and comment as major plans make their way through the advisory committee process and
ultimately, go to the MPO Board for formal action such as approval or adoption. State statutes and
Federal law require the provision of adequate public notice of public participation activities, providing
timely notice and reasonable access to information about transportation issues, using visualization
techniques to describe the LRTP and TIP and making information and meeting notices available in
electronic format on the Internet. Rarely are public comment periods of specific duration specified by law
except for the following with regards to the PPP and LRTP:
PPP - Adopting or revising the MPO’s Public Participation Plan – 45 calendar days
9.E.1
Packet Pg. 869 Attachment: Amended PPP – Track Changes (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
17 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
LRTP - Posting the final adopted LRTP on the internet and having hard copies available at
the MPO office– no later than 90 days after adoption
HOW TO SUBMIT COMMENTS TO THE COLLIER MPO
• The MPO provides self-addressed stamped comment cards which may be mailed to the MPO
office. Call 239-252-5814 for more information.
• Comments may be submitted on the MPO website with electronic comment cards. Go to
www.colliermpo.com
• The public may comment at any MPO advisory committee or MPO Board meeting. The meeting
schedule is available on the MPO website Meeting Schedule or by calling 239-252-5814
HOW YOUR COMMENTS WILL BE USED
The Collier MPO values public input. All comments received will be considered as part of the
transportation decision-making process. Staff will document all comments and forward them to the MPO
advisory committees and Boards. All organizations and individuals who submit a comment in writing or
via email and include their contact information will receive a written response to their comment. Staff will
make every effort to respond to comments before a final vote by the MPO Board on an action item.
Comments received using the methods described above are documented as part of the public record and
are posted on line at www.colliermpo.com
Appendix F Standard Operating Procedures identifies how public comments will be documented.
GETTING INVOLVED
The current calendar of MPO and advisory committee meetings may be found online at
www.colliermpo.com or you may request a hard copy be mailed or faxed to you by calling 239-252-5814.
MPO BOARD MEETINGS
The MPO Board meets on the second Friday of the month (with the exception of July, August and January,
when there are no regularly scheduled meetings.) Board meetings are typically held in the Board of County
Commissioners Chambers, 3299 E. Tamiami Blvd. Naples, Administration Building (F), third floor. See Site
map for Collier County Government Center, following page. The Collier MPO traditionally holds its April
Board meeting in a different location, rotating between facilities provided by member entities.
Joint Lee County MPO/Collier MPO advisory committee and Board meetings rotate locations between Lee
County and Collier County. Additionally, special meetings are sometimes called on dates, times and
locations that vary from the norm. Staff advises checking the MPO website prior to a Board meeting to
confirm the location, date and time of a meeting you wish to attend. Please check the MPO calendar for
advisory committee meeting dates, times and locations as well.
9.E.1
Packet Pg. 870 Attachment: Amended PPP – Track Changes (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
18 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
9.E.1
Packet Pg. 871 Attachment: Amended PPP – Track Changes (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
19 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
ADVISER NETWORK PUBLIC FORUMS
In addition to providing notice via the MPO’s listserv(s), the MPO will send email notice to the Adviser
Network when hosting community meetings on plans and studies in process, to solicit public input on
issues of current interest. As part of the process, MPO staff or the MPO’s consultant will prepare a recap
of the meeting to document public comments and to share the comments and recommendations with
the advisory committees and MPO Board. See Appendix F – Standard Operating Procedures for more
detail.
APPOINTMENTS TO ADVISORY COMMITTEES
The Collier MPO Board appoints local residents to serve on two Advisory Committees – the Citizens
Advisory Committee (CAC) and the Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC). The MPO Bylaws
specify the makeup of each committee. The MPO Bylaws may be viewed on the MPO website at the
following link: MPO Board Bylaws
The bylaws of the CAC may be viewed at the following link(s): CAC Bylaws
BPAC Bylaws: BPAC Bylaws
If you are interested in serving on one of these two advisory committees, staff recommends first reviewing
the bylaws to determine your eligibility, then contacting the MPO Director at 239-252-5884 if you have
questions concerning eligibility or the time commitment entailed.
You may download an application to serve on an Advisory Committee at this link: Advisory Committee
Application
As an alternative, you may call the MPO office at 239-252-5814 and ask that an application form be sent
to your home address. Completed application forms must include your signature and may be scanned and
sent electronically to colliermpo@colliergov.net. If you prefer, you may mail in or hand deliver
applications to the MPO office at 2885 South Horseshoe Drive, Naples, FL 34104
HOW TO LEAVE COMMENTS ABOUT A SPECIFIC PLAN OR STUDY
The MPO website features the Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP), the Transportation Improvement
Program (TIP), the Unified Public Work Program (UPWP) and other plans currently underway.
Opportunities for the public to comment accompany each posted plan. Call the office if you have any
questions (239) 252-5814 or cannot find what you are looking for on the website: www.colliermpo.com
PUBLIC MEETING SCHEDULES
The meeting schedule is standardized but it is subject to change. Check the location by viewing the current
agenda on the MPO website or call the MPO office at 239-252-5814 to have one sent to you. Link to
agendas: MPO Meeting Agendas
9.E.1
Packet Pg. 872 Attachment: Amended PPP – Track Changes (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
20 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
ACCESS FOR ALL
LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY PLAN
The purpose of the Collier MPO’s Limited English Proficiency Plan is to provide meaningful access to the
MPO for people with limited or no ability to speak, read, write or understand English. The LEP Plan is
incorporated in the PPP as Appendix C.
NONDISCRIMINATION POLICY AND COMPLAINT PROCEDURE
Collier MPO places a high value on providing equal access to the transportation planning process. The
MPO’s Nondiscrimination Plan and Complaint Procedures are incorporated in the PPP as Appendix D.
IDENTIFYING UNDERSERVED POPULATIONS
Collier MPO maintains a GIS database and map that identifies traditionally underserved populations in the
region. MPO staff updates the database and map periodically, based on conducting annual reviews of
Census Bureau statistics. See Appendix E for the current version of the map and related statistics. The
following Outreach Strategies are intended to reach a broad cross-section of the region’s demographics,
including traditionally underserved populations.
OUTREACH STRATEGIES
The MPO will use is using the following outreach strategies to engage the public in the
transportation planning process. Appendix F – Standard Operating Procedures summarizes in
graphic format how these strategies will be deployed on specific plans and studies along with
public notification requirements for committee and Board meetings.
ENHANCED INTERACTIVE WEBSITE: www.colliermpo.com
The MPO is updatinghas updated its website to introduce interactive features that will enhance its ability
to serve as a source of information. The site provides a calendar of events, links to agendas, minutes, and
Un traductor del idioma español está disponible
en la oficina de MPO. Teléfono: 239-252-5814
Gen yon tradiktè Kreyòl Ayisyen ki disponib nan
biwo MPO la. Telefòn: Yon tradiktè pou Kreyòl
ayisyen ki disponib nan biwo MPO la. Telefòn:
9.E.1
Packet Pg. 873 Attachment: Amended PPP – Track Changes (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
21 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
draft MPO documents currently under review. Opportunities for the public to comment are available in
the form of staff email and phone number listings. Interactive surveys and maps are frequently posted on
the website while major plans and studies are in process.
VISUALIZATION TECHNIQUES
The MPO will investis investing in enhanced visualization techniques such as videos, simulation models,
animated graphics and 3D imaging in the course of developing updates to the Long-Range Transportation
Plan and other major plans and studies that may be underway in any given year. For example, in 2018,
staff posted a video created for the Golden Gate Walkability Study. The video was produced by a drone,
fly-over camera view of people walking and crossing streets in the community. Information was added to
generate interest in participating in public meetings to develop the plan. The video was also shown on
local public access TV.
In addition, the MPO will continueis continuing the use of a broad range of traditional visualization
techniques such as maps, pictures or graphics in order to assist with the communication of complex
concepts and to promote understanding of transportation plans and programs. A logo representing the
MPO is used to identify products and publications of the MPO. The logo helps the public to become
familiar with the MPO and recognize MPO products. The logo is used on all MPO publications.
E-NOTIFICATIONS AND SOCIAL MEDIA
The MPO began posting information on Collier County’s Facebook page in January 2018. Current MPO
postings may be viewed at the following link: https://www.facebook.com/CollierGov/
In addition, E-blasts will beare sent to members of the Adviser Network and other interested parties to
provide helpful information on transportation planning, public meetings, events and opportunities for
involvement. The MPO Master Database lists all contacts including businesses, residential associations,
agencies, Native American Tribes, the Adviser Network, and the public. The database includes committee
membership and e-mail addresses. Mailing addresses will be included for Individuals who do not have e-
mail and require hard copy documents, surveys, comment cards, etc. to be mailed to them.
9.E.1
Packet Pg. 874 Attachment: Amended PPP – Track Changes (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
22 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
SURVEYS & POLLS
The MPO will conducts surveys and polls on specific topics and plans as needed to engage a broad cross
section of the public. The information will be shared on the MPO’s website.
PARTNERING
The MPO will coordinates with government agencies to conduct outreach at health care centers, food
banks and food stamp offices, schools, offices on aging etc. and develop alliances with faith-based
institutions, cultural centers, community-based organizations; partnering with local interest groups to
conduct outreach at special events. Partners in outreach will be are encouraged to take a leadership role
in public participation efforts in the area. The purpose is to build relationships and identify strategies to
bring former nonparticipants into the planning process.
PUBLIC TELEVISION
Regular MPO Board meetings – those that take place at the Board of County Commissioners Chamber -
are shown on Collier TV, and can be watched live and on-line at the following link: Collier County TV
Collier County maintains an archive of MPO Board meetings on-line. The MPO is currently working with
Collier TV to also post video recordings and flyers produced by the MPO on Collier TV. Collier County
Meeting Video Archive
EARNED MEDIA
The MPO will issueissues press releases and provide briefings in advance of special events and public
meetings and workshops oriented to plan development or gathering public comments on major issues.
The intention is to build relationships with local television, radio and print journalists and reporters to
facilitate public information campaigns. For example, during the development of the Bicycle and
Pedestrian Master Plan in 2018, the Project Manager with the MPO was interviewed on Univision, with
translation services provided by the station for its Spanish speaking audience.
PROJECT SPECIFIC PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT PLANS (PIP)
The MPO typically develops project specific PIPs targeting stakeholders who are most likely to be
interested in the outcome of the plan or project in question. The public involvement strategies are geared
to the target audience and may vary by topic or subarea of the MPO.
A PIP developed for a specific project must meet or exceed the notification commitments in the Board-
adopted PPP.
9.E.1
Packet Pg. 875 Attachment: Amended PPP – Track Changes (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
23 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
SEMI-ANNUAL MONTHLY eNEWSLETTER
MPO staff has traditionally produceds a semi-annual newsletter that is distributed via email and hard copy
to the Master Database list of all contacts. The MPO has recently expanded that practice by publishing a
monthly newsletter in digital format. MPO staff will continue to bring hard copies for distribution at public
meetings and community outreach events held throughout the year. The newsletter promotes regular
and special meetings, planning studies, publications and work products. The newsletter will be translated
into Spanish or Haitian Creole upon request.
PUBLIC WORKSHOPS/OPEN-HOUSES
Public workshops are generally open and informal with project team members interacting with the public
on a one-on-one basis. Short presentations may be given at these meetings. Project-specific workshops
and meetings provide detailed project information to the public and solicit public involvement. They are
conducted for project-specific activities and the MPO’s federal certification review. (See PIP above and
Appendix F – Standard Operating Procedures for more detail.)
PUBLIC MEETINGS
All MPO Board and advisory committee meetings are open to the public at ADA accessible facilities in
convenient locations and used to solicit public comment. Members of the public are given an opportunity
to address the MPO board or committee on any agenda item or transportation related topic not on the
agenda. These meetings provide formal settings for citizens or interested parties to make comments to
the MPO and advisory committees. They are recorded, and minutes are taken for the record. The MPO
may also hold stand-alone public meetings related to specific projects or plans. These meetings can be
held at any time during a project. Notice of the meetings is given to the public through the MPO website,
e-mail, and if requested, by regular mail. The MPO issues press releases to notify the media of public
meetings, as recommended by the Government in the Sunshine Manual (2017).Florida Sunshine Law.
COMMUNITY OUTREACH EVENTS
MPO staff participation in community outreach events at public venues, fairs and festivals provides
another method to inform the public about the Collier MPO and how individuals or groups can become
involved in the metropolitan transportation planning process. MPO surveys, newsletters, maps or
comment forms are often distributed to heighten the awareness of the public on functions of the MPO.
MPO staff will participate in activities hosted by other agencies and organizations and provide printed
materials at outreach events.
COMMENT FORMS
Comment forms are used to solicit public comment on specific issues being presented at workshops or
public meetings and community outreach events. Comment forms may be very general in nature, or very
specific for soliciting feedback. Comment forms are sometimes included in publications and on the MPO
website to solicit input.
9.E.1
Packet Pg. 876 Attachment: Amended PPP – Track Changes (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
24 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
QR CODES
The MPO inserts Quick Response (QR) Codes on the covers of adopted plans such as the Long
Range Transportation Plan, Public Participation Plan, Transportation Improvement Program,
Unified Planning Work Program and the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan. QR codes allow the
public immediate access to view MPO documents using cell phone applications.
ORIENTATIONS
MPO staff conduct individual orientations to inform new members of the MPO Board and
committees of their roles and the MPO transportation planning process.
EVALUATION
ANNUAL REPORTING ON PERFORMANCE MEASURES
Reporting on the PPP performance measures is included in the MPO Director’s Annual Report to the MPO
Board at the end of each fiscal year. If the analysis indicates a need for modifications to the PPP, the
Director will discuss options with the Board and follow-up with bringing the changes through the Advisory
Committee review process during the coming year.
REQUIRED NOTIFICATION
The MPO will review the PPP on an annual basis to ensure it remains consistent with the requirements in
the Florida Department of Transportation’s MPO Handbook. The MPO Handbook may be viewed in its
entirely at the following link: FDOT MPO Handbook
Current requirements are summarized by planning product as follows.
LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN
Florida Statutes 339.175 – requires the MPO to provide the following interested parties, at a minimum, a
reasonable opportunity to comment on the LRTP:
• Public
• Affected Public Agencies
• Representatives of Transportation Agencies
• Freight Transportation Service Providers and Shippers
• Private providers of Transportation
• Public Transit Representatives and Users
9.E.1
Packet Pg. 877 Attachment: Amended PPP – Track Changes (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
25 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
• 23 CFR 450.322 – All interested parties are to be given a reasonable opportunity to
comment on the LRTP.
Administrative Modifications are minor revisions to the LRTP and do not require public review
and comment or re-demonstrating fiscal constraint. 23 CFR 450.104
Amendments are major revisions to the LRTP and do require public involvement and re-
demonstrating fiscal constraint.
Major Updates are adopted every 5 years. The TAC and CAC are provided the opportunity to
review and comment on Amendments and Major Updates prior to the MPO Board taking action.
If the TAC and CAC achieve a quorum, the committees may vote to endorse the amendment or
update as presented, or vote to endorse subject to revision, or may vote not to endorse. Whatever
action an advisory committee takes is reported to the Board in the MPO staff Executive Summary.
See Appendix F – Standard Operating Procedures for public notification and public comment
period requirements.
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
Maintaining Concurrency with MPO Handbook - FDOT continually updates the MPO Handbook and
notifies the MPOs of any changes. These FDOT-generated updates may on occasion trigger the need to
update the PPP as well. When that occurs, the MPO will post notice containing the new PPP language on
its website and distribute copies to the MPO Advisory Committees and Board. Other routine updates,
such as identifying new MPO Board members and/or officers, new MPO contact information, new State
and Federal code citations, correcting typographical or grammatical errors or clarifications, will be
handled in the same manner
Amendments and Adopting a New PPP - Amendments and Major Updates will be previewed by the MPO
TAC and CAC before being acted upon by the Board.
Federal law requires a minimum 45-day public comment period prior to amending or adopting
a PPP. The public comment period begins with posting the CAC and TAC meeting agendas,
posting notification on the MPO website, and emailing the Adviser Network. Final Board action
may be scheduled to occur after the 45-day public comment period has ended.
TRANSPORTATION DISADVANTAGED SERVICE PLAN (TDSP)
Purpose – A TDSP addresses the services provided to meet the public transportation and mobility needs
of the elderly and persons with disabilities. The plan discusses the types of paratransit services available
to citizens of the county. Examples include: ADA paratransit service and Transportation Disadvantaged
Program (TD) services which are part of a coordinated human services requirement of all three core FTA
grant programs as reauthorized under the FAST Act for the Urbanized Area Formula Funding program, 49
U.S.C. 5307, 5310 and 5311.
Statutory Requirements – Florida Statutes (F.S.) 427. Each county or each MPO is required to develop a
TDSP with updates every five years. The Florida Commission for the Transportation Disadvantaged (FCTD)
9.E.1
Packet Pg. 878 Attachment: Amended PPP – Track Changes (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
26 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
oversees the implementation of the TDSP. The Community Transportation Coordinator (CTC) and the
Local Coordinating Board (LCB) will use the TDSP as a guide for maintaining and improving transportation
services. It is the requirement of the MPO to provide an annual performance evaluation of the CTC. The
MPO is also required to provide annual minor updates to the TDSP and a major update every five years.
Florida Commission for the Transportation Disadvantaged
The Florida Commission for the Transportation Disadvantaged has issued two regulatory documents –
“Local Coordinating Board and Planning Agency Operating Guidelines (2014)” and an “Instruction Manual
for the Memorandum of Agreement and the TDSP – 2007/2008” that remain in effect today. The
documents may be viewed on the Commission’s website at: TD Commission
The Commission stipulates that Major Updates to the TDSP be announced by way of an “advertisement”
published in the local newspaper with the greatest circulation. This requirement is carried out by the MPO.
Major Update - adopted every 5 years
Public Comment Period
30-day public comment period required
Legal ad required – place in Naples Daily News
• Additional public notice of public comment period provided by posting on the MPO website,
emailing the Adviser Network and any other stakeholders the MPO and LCB have identified
• Distribute flyers on transit vehicles to notify riders of comment period and adoption meeting
• Distribute copies of the Major TDSP Update and/or QRC on comment forms to local government
agency offices and libraries
• Post Major TDSP Update and comment forms on the MPO website
• Distribute copies of the Major TDSP Update to the LCB members
Response to Comments
• MPO staff will respond in writing to public input received during the comment period
• When significant written and oral comments are received, a summary, analysis or report will be
included in the plan. The term, “significant” is used in State statutes and Federal law governing
public involvement but remains undefined. The MPO’s working definition of “significant” is any
comment that could potentially result in a change to the scope of a document, existing conditions
analysis, issue definition, recommended projects, policies.
Adoption
• The LCB will meet at the end of the public comment period and allow time for public comment at
the meeting prior to adoption of the TDSP
• The LCB will consider the comments received during the public comment period before adopting
the TDSP by Roll Call Vote
9.E.1
Packet Pg. 879 Attachment: Amended PPP – Track Changes (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
27 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
• The MPO Board will ratify the Major TDSP Update after adoption by the LCB. Ratification may be
placed on the MPO Board Consent Agenda
Minor Update – adopted annually except in Major Update adoption years
The only difference between the public involvement requirements of a Major and Minor Update
is the required public comment period is shortened to 14 days and no distribution of flyers &
comment forms on transit vehicles and CAT transfer Stations is required.
TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Administrative Modifications are minor revisions to the TIP and do not require public review and
comment, or re-demonstrations of fiscal constraint. Administration Modifications will be distributed as
informational items in MPO Board and advisory committee meeting packets, in addition to being posted
on the MPO website’s TIP page.
Amendments are major revisions to the TIP and do require public review and comment along with re-
demonstration of financial constraint. The TAC and CAC are provided the opportunity to review and
comment on amendments and the annual adoption of a new 5-year TIP based on the FDOT Work Program
prior to the Board taking action. If they achieve a quorum, the TAC and CAC may vote to endorse the
amendment as presented or vote to endorse subject to revision or may vote not to endorse. Whatever
action an advisory committee takes is reported to the Board in the MPO staff Executive Summary. The
MPO will follow the notification procedures outlined herein for MPO Board and Advisory Committee
meetings See Appendix F – Standard Operating Procedures for public notification and public comment
period requirements.
UNIFIED PLANNING WORK PROGRAM
The two-year UPWP is adopted every other year. As with Amendments, the MPO adoption process
requires that the two-year UPWP be previewed and commented upon by the MPO TAC and CAC, at a
minimum, before being acted upon by the Board.
Modifications as defined by the FDOT MPO Handbook, do not require MPO Board or FDOT approval and
do not require public involvement. Modifications will be posted on the MPO website on the UPWP page
and distributed to FDOT, the MPO Board and Advisory Committees as informational items in agenda
packets.
Amendments as defined by the FDOT MPO Handbook, do require MPO Board approval. The TAC and CAC
are provided the opportunity to review and comment on amendments prior to the Board taking action. If
the committees achieve a quorum, they may vote to endorse the amendment as presented, or vote to
endorse subject to revision, or vote not to endorse. Whatever action an advisory committee takes is
reported to the Board in the MPO staff Executive Summary. The MPO will follow the notification
9.E.1
Packet Pg. 880 Attachment: Amended PPP – Track Changes (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
28 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
procedures outlined herein for MPO Board and Advisory Committee meetings. See Appendix F – Standard
Operating Procedures for public notification and public comment period requirements.
MPO BOARD MEETINGS AND WORKSHOPS
The MPO commits to maintaining the following longstanding notification standard:
• Posting agenda and meeting packet seven days in advance on the MPO website
• Email distribution of agenda and packet to MPO Board members and delivering hard copies to
members who have requested them, seven days in advance of the meeting
• Email distribution of agenda and packet to Advisor Network and to other interested parties on
the MPO’s email contact list
• Working with Collier County Communications Division to Issue a press release a minimum of 48
hours prior to the meeting
MPO ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETINGS
The MPO commits to maintaining the following longstanding notification standard:
• Posting agenda and meeting packet seven days in advance on the MPO website
• Email distribution of agenda and packet to committee members along with hard copies delivered
to members who have requested them, seven days in advance of the meeting
• Email distribution of agenda and packet to Adviser Network and to other interested parties on
the MPO’s email contact list
• Working with Collier County Communications Division to Issue a press release a minimum of 48
hours prior to the meeting
OTHER PUBLIC MEETINGS AND WORKSHOPS
The MPO may wish to schedule other public meetings and workshops in the course of developing a wide
variety of planning documents, researching specific issues, conducting surveys and public education
campaigns. The MPO commits to maintaining the longstanding notification standard of:
• Posting notices of public meetings a minimum seven days in advance on the MPO website,
• Posting agenda and meeting packet, to the extent materials are available, on MPO website
• Email distribution of agenda and packet to Advisor Network and to other interested parties on
the MPO’s contact list
• Issuing press release to major local newspapers, television and radio stations
9.E.1
Packet Pg. 881 Attachment: Amended PPP – Track Changes (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
29 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
• Emailing MPO Advisory Committee members notice of meetings on topics of interest to the
Committee members as appropriate
• Working with Collier County Communications Division to Issue a press release a minimum of 48
hours prior to the meeting
EXCEPTIONS TO NOTIFICATION COMMITMENTS
There are occasions when the MPO is required to act quickly in order to meet a grant deadline, preserve
spending authority or respond to an unforeseen opportunity or emergency. Unforeseen opportunities are
most likely to occur in response to a request by FDOT due to the severe time constraints the agency
operates under. Emergency situations include manmade and natural disasters such as hurricanes, floods,
epidemics and pandemics, chemical spills, acts of terrorism, cyber-attacks, etc.
In a nonemergency situation when an unforeseen opportunity demands immediate Board action, staff
may bring proposed actions forward to the MPO Board that the TAC and CAC have not had the opportunity
to preview and comment on. This allows the Board to be fully informed of the situation and to take action
if it wishes to do so, or to decline to take immediate action and remand the item to one or more Advisory
Committee for further study.
There are occasions when the MPO is required to act quickly in order to meet a grant deadline, preserve
spending authority or respond to an unforeseen opportunity. This is most likely to occur in response to a
request by FDOT due to the severe time constraints the agency operates under.
When situations demanding immediate Board action arise, staff may bring proposed actions forward to
the MPO Board that the TAC and CAC have not had the opportunity to preview and comment on. This
allows the Board to be fully informed of the situation and to take action if it wishes to do so, or to decline
to take immediate action and remand the item to one or more Advisory Committee for further study.
EMERGENCY PROVISIONS FOR PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT
Public engagement is very important to the MPO, FDOT, FHWA and FTA. In an effort to protect public
health and to comply with instructions, recommendations and Executive Orders issued during a pandemic
or other threat to community health, the MPO will be proactive but flexible in meeting public participation
plan requirements. MPOs are expected to continue to provide opportunities for public involvement
throughout their planning activities. However, some public participation plan activities may be delayed
or deferred and be replaced with other engagement strategies to ensure that all sectors of the population
have an opportunity to participate. The MPO will document any outreach activities that were originally
documented in the PPP or in a PIP for a specific project that require modifications and provide strategies,
if needed, to ensure sufficient and appropriate outreach is maintained.
Immediate/Short Term Response
Formatted: Font color: Text 2
9.E.1
Packet Pg. 882 Attachment: Amended PPP – Track Changes (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
30 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
In the event of a manmade or natural emergency that precludes holding regular public meetings, the MPO
Board may provide staff direction on how to proceed by way of passing a motion. The motion may include
authorizing the MPO Chair to act on behalf of the Board and empower the MPO Director to bring issues
requiring immediate attention forward to the MPO Chair to act upon. The MPO Board will have the
opportunity to ratify all emergency actions taken at a later date.
Intermediate Response
Once the scope of an emergency becomes better defined, the US President, Congress, Governor of the
State of Florida or Local Governing Boards and Councils may issue declarations of emergency and
Executive Orders that MPOs must follow. In the event of a declaration of manmade or natural emergency
that precludes holding regular public meetings for a known or unknown period of time, the MPO Board
will adopt a resolution to:
1. Recognize the emergency situation calling for alternative public involvement strategies
2. Stipulate that the emergency procedures for public involvement are temporary
3. Specify the alternative public involvement strategies to be used, including time periods for public
comment and MPO responses to the comments
4. Ensure that public involvement strategies are inclusive as possible to the extent that they comply
with emergency executive orders to protect public health, etc;
5. if public involvement strategies are not sufficiently inclusive due to public health concern or other
limitations, the MPO may consider holding additional public involvement activities on the plans
after adoption, and after the emergency is over, to ensure that the public is informed and has the
ability to request reconsiderations/amendments to the MPO Board
6. Acknowledge that the resolution is provided as an interim measure and may be modified as new
local, state or national technical assistance and/or guidance is issued
Public involvement strategies include but are not limited to virtual meetings, on-line surveys, telephone
conferencing, social media and interactive components of the MPO website. It is desirable, and may be
feasible, to maintain the public participation plan’s standard methodologies and timeframes for reporting
and responding to public comments. However, if the time frame must be shortened or the methodologies
are curtailed due to the nature of the emergency, the MPO may take whatever steps are necessary to
meet deadlines. In the event of a public health emergency coinciding with a cyber-attack, public
involvement activities may have to be suspended for a period of time.
Long Term Response
In the event that an emergency situation persists for several months or more and in the absence of action
taken by the federal government to extend the deadlines for delivery of core MPO planning products such
as the LRTP, UPWP, TIP and PPP; the MPO may take whatever action is necessary to meet the federal
deadlines.
9.E.1
Packet Pg. 883 Attachment: Amended PPP – Track Changes (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
31 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
After the emergency is over, the MPO will resume its regular meeting schedule and public involvement
activities with the highest priority given to meeting immediate deadlines and the next level of priority
given to providing opportunities for the public to review, comment on and request amendments to any
plans that were adopted during the emergency.
Continuity of Operations Plans
The MPO is required to maintain a Continuity of Operations Plan (COOP) that outlines the course of action
to be taken during an emergency. MPO staff participate in Collier County’s annual updates to its COOP to
facilitate concurrent implementation of both plans during an emergency.
9.E.1
Packet Pg. 884 Attachment: Amended PPP – Track Changes (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
32 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
FEDERAL COMPLIANCE
AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT
The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), signed into law in 1990, is a landmark civil rights legislation
ensuring equal opportunity for people with disabilities to access employment, public facilities,
transportation, state and local government services and communications. The ADA requires coordinating
with disabled community representatives in the development and improvement of transportation
services. Persons with disabilities must also be able to access the sites where public involvement activities
occur as well as the information presented. See www.ada.gov for more information.
TITLE VI OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 19654
Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 19654 prohibits discrimination based upon race, color or national origin.
Specifically, 42 USC § 2000d states, “No person in the United States shall, on the grounds of race, color or
national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to
discrimination under any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.” See Title VI Civil Rights
Act US Dept of Justice for more information.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 12898 – ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE
Executive Order (EO) 12898; Federal Actions to Address Environmental justice in Minority and Low-
Income Populations. The EO reinforced the requirements of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and
focused federal attention on the environmental and human health conditions in minority and low-income
communities. Furthermore, recent guidance issued by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and
the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) emphasizes the importance of considering and addressing
Environmental Justice (EJ) in all phases of the transportation planning process. EJ calls for the fair
treatment and meaningful involvement of all people regardless of race, color, national origin or income,
and that the benefits, as well as the impacts, of transportation investments are fairly distributed.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 13166 – LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
People with Limited English Proficiency (LEP) are those with a primary or home language other than
English. EO 13166 requires any agency that receives federal funds to make their activities accessible to
non-English speaking individuals. See Limited English Proficiency Executive Order for more information.
REQUIREMENT FOR PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
The following material is excerpted from the electronic Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Chapter 23
HIGHWAYS.
“eCFR Ch 23 HIGHWAYS
§450.316 Interested parties, participation, and consultation.
9.E.1
Packet Pg. 885 Attachment: Amended PPP – Track Changes (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
33 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
(a) The MPO shall develop and use a documented participation plan that defines a process for
providing individuals, affected public agencies, representatives of public transportation employees,
public ports, freight shippers, providers of freight transportation services, private providers of
transportation (including intercity bus operators, employer-based commuting programs, such as
carpool program, vanpool program, transit benefit program, parking cash-out program, shuttle
program, or telework program), representatives of users of public transportation, representatives of
users of pedestrian walkways and bicycle transportation facilities, representatives of the disabled, and
other interested parties with reasonable opportunities to be involved in the metropolitan transportation
planning process.
(1) The MPO shall develop the participation plan in consultation with all interested parties and
shall, at a minimum, describe explicit procedures, strategies, and desired outcomes for:
(i) Providing adequate public notice of public participation activities and time for public review
and comment at key decision points, including a reasonable opportunity to comment on the proposed
metropolitan transportation plan and the TIP;
(ii) Providing timely notice and reasonable access to information about transportation issues and
processes;
(iii) Employing visualization techniques to describe metropolitan transportation plans and TIPs;
(iv) Making public information (technical information and meeting notices) available in
electronically accessible formats and means, such as the World Wide Web;
(v) Holding any public meetings at convenient and accessible locations and times;
(vi) Demonstrating explicit consideration and response to public input received during the
development of the metropolitan transportation plan and the TIP;
(vii) Seeking out and considering the needs of those traditionally underserved by existing
transportation systems, such as low-income and minority households, who may face challenges
accessing employment and other services;
(viii) Providing an additional opportunity for public comment, if the final metropolitan
transportation plan or TIP differs significantly from the version that was made available for public
comment by the MPO and raises new material issues that interested parties could not reasonably
have foreseen from the public involvement efforts;
(ix) Coordinating with the statewide transportation planning public involvement and consultation
processes under subpart B of this part; and
(x) Periodically reviewing the effectiveness of the procedures and strategies contained in the
participation plan to ensure a full and open participation process.
(2) When significant written and oral comments are received on the draft metropolitan
transportation plan and TIP (including the financial plans) as a result of the participation process in
this section or the interagency consultation process required under the EPA transportation conformity
regulations (40 CFR part 93, subpart A), a summary, analysis, and report on the disposition of
comments shall be made as part of the final metropolitan transportation plan and TIP.
9.E.1
Packet Pg. 886 Attachment: Amended PPP – Track Changes (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
34 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
(3) A minimum public comment period of 45 calendar days shall be provided before the initial or
revised participation plan is adopted by the MPO. Copies of the approved participation plan shall be
provided to the FHWA and the FTA for informational purposes and shall be posted on the World Wide
Web, to the maximum extent practicable.
(b) In developing metropolitan transportation plans and TIPs, the MPO should consult with
agencies and officials responsible for other planning activities within the MPA that are affected by
transportation (including State and local planned growth, economic development, tourism, natural
disaster risk reduction, environmental protection, airport operations, or freight movements) or
coordinate its planning process (to the maximum extent practicable) with such planning activities. In
addition, the MPO shall develop the metropolitan transportation plans and TIPs with due consideration
of other related planning activities within the metropolitan area, and the process shall provide for the
design and delivery of transportation services within the area that are provided by:
(1) Recipients of assistance under title 49 U.S.C. Chapter 53;
(2) Governmental agencies and non-profit organizations (including representatives of the
agencies and organizations) that receive Federal assistance from a source other than the U.S.
Department of Transportation to provide non-emergency transportation services; and
(3) Recipients of assistance under 23 U.S.C. 201-204.
(c) When the MPA includes Indian Tribal lands, the MPO shall appropriately involve the Indian
Tribal government(s) in the development of the metropolitan transportation plan and the TIP.
(d) When the MPA includes Federal public lands, the MPO shall appropriately involve the Federal
land management agencies in the development of the metropolitan transportation plan and the TIP.
(e) MPOs shall, to the extent practicable, develop a documented process(es) that outlines roles,
responsibilities, and key decision points for consulting with other governments and agencies, as
defined in paragraphs (b), (c), and (d) of this section, which may be included in the agreement(s)
developed under §450.314.
[81 FR 34135, May 27, 2016, as amended at 81 FR 93473, Dec. 20, 2016; 82 FR 56544, Nov. 29, 2017]”
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN AND STATE STATUTES
The following is excerpted from Florida State Statutes, available at the following link:
www.flsenate.gov/Laws/Statutes/2012/339.175
“339.175 METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATIONS
(7) 2.(e) LONG-RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN In the development of its long-range transportation
plan, each M.P.O. must provide the public, affected public agencies, representatives of transportation
agency employees, freight shippers, providers of freight transportation services, private providers of
transportation, representatives of users of public transit, and other interested parties with a reasonable
9.E.1
Packet Pg. 887 Attachment: Amended PPP – Track Changes (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
35 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
opportunity to comment on the long-range transportation plan. The long-range transportation plan
must be approved by the M.P.O.
6/(e)1. Each M.P.O. shall appoint a citizens’ advisory committee, the members of which serve at the
pleasure of the M.P.O. The membership on the citizens’ advisory committee must reflect a broad cross-
section of local residents with an interest in the development of an efficient, safe, and cost-effective
transportation system. Minorities, the elderly, and the handicapped must be adequately represented.
(8) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM. Each M.P.O. shall, in cooperation with the state and
affected public transportation operators, develop a transportation improvement program for the area
within the jurisdiction of the M.P.O. In the development of the transportation improvement program,
each M.P.O. must provide the public, affected public agencies, representatives of transportation agency
employees, freight shippers, providers of freight transportation services, private providers of
transportation, representatives of users of public transit, and other interested parties with a reasonable
opportunity to comment on the proposed transportation improvement program.”
SUNSHINE LAW §286.011 F.S.
Source: “Government in the Sunshine” PPT by Office of the County Attorney, Jeffrey A. Klatzkow
Establishes a basic right of access to most meetings of boards, commissions and other governing bodies
of state and local government agencies or authorities
• Meetings of public boards, commissions or committees (“boards”) must be open to the public.
• Reasonable notice of such meetings must be given.
• Minutes of the meeting must be taken.
The public must be allowed to attend meetings; however, there is no obligation to allow the public to
participate. The location:
• Must be accessible
• Sufficient size for turnout
• Facility cannot discriminate based on age, race, etc.
• Public access not unreasonably restricted
• Be within Collier County with few exceptions
Minutes of the meeting are required. Written minutes must be taken and made available promptly.
• Sound recordings may also be used, but only in addition to written minutes
• Minutes may be a brief summary of meeting’s events
• Minutes are public records
• Minutes must record the votes.
Reasonable Notice, according to the “Government In The Sunshine Manual” (2017) Section 4a.
“The Sunshine Law does not define the term “reasonable notice.” Therefore, the type of notice is
variable and depends upon the facts of the situation and the board involved. In each case, an agency
Formatted: Font: (Default) +Body (Calibri), 11 pt
Formatted: Font: (Default) +Body (Calibri), 11 pt, NotBold
Formatted: Font: (Default) +Body (Calibri), 11 pt
Formatted: Font: (Default) +Body (Calibri), 11 pt, NotBold
Formatted: Font: (Default) +Body (Calibri), 11 pt
Formatted: Font: (Default) +Body (Calibri), 11 pt, NotBold
Formatted: Font: (Default) +Body (Calibri), 11 pt
Formatted: Font: (Default) +Body (Calibri), 11 pt
Formatted: Font: (Default) +Body (Calibri), 11 pt
Formatted: Font: (Default) +Body (Calibri), 11 pt, NotBold
Formatted: Font: (Default) +Body (Calibri), 11 pt, NotBold
Formatted: Font: (Default) +Body (Calibri), 11 pt
Formatted: Font: (Default) +Body (Calibri), 11 pt, NotItalic
Formatted: Font: (Default) +Body (Calibri), 11 pt
Formatted: Font: (Default) +Body (Calibri), 11 pt, NotBold
Formatted: Font: (Default) +Body (Calibri), 11 pt
9.E.1
Packet Pg. 888 Attachment: Amended PPP – Track Changes (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
36 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
must give notice at such time and in such a manner as to enable the media and the general public to
attend the meeting.”
The Attorney General’s office cannot specify the type of notice which must be given in all cases, the
following notice guidelines are suggested:
1. Notice should contain time and place of meeting and an agenda if available, or a statement of the
general subject matter to be considered.
2. Notice should be prominently displayed in the area in the agency’s offices set aside for that purpose
and on the agency’s website.
3. Notice should be provided at least 7 days prior to meeting, except in the case of emergency or special
meetings. Emergency meetings should provide the most effective and appropriate notice feasible under
the circumstances.
4. Special meetings should have no less than 24 and preferably at least 72 hours reasonable notice to
the public.
5. Use of press releases, faxes, e-mails and/or phone calls to the local news media is highly effective in
providing notice of upcoming meetings.
The Sunshine Law does not mandate that an agency use a paid advertisement to provide public notice of
a meeting.
9.E.1
Packet Pg. 889 Attachment: Amended PPP – Track Changes (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
37 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
FDOT MPO HANDBOOK - COMPLIANCE
CHAPTER SIX PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT
Chapter Six of the FDOT MPO Handbook identifies Federal and State public involvement requirements for
Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPO) in Florida. The primary public involvement document that
MPOs must develop and maintain is a Public Participation Plan (PPP) that defines a process for providing
interested parties reasonable opportunities to review and comment on MPO work products. In addition,
MPOs must make Long Range Transportation Plans (LRTP) and Transportation Improvement Plans (TIP)
readily available for public review.
The MPO is required to develop the participation plan in consultation with all interested parties and must,
at a minimum, describe explicit procedures, strategies, and desired outcomes for: [23 C.F.R. 450.316(a)(1)]
1. Providing adequate public notice of public participation activities and time for public review and
comment at key decision points, including a reasonable opportunity to comment on the proposed LRTP
and the TIP;
2. Providing timely notice and reasonable access to information about transportation issues and
processes;
3. Employing visualization techniques to describe LRTPs and TIPs;
4. Making public information (technical information and meeting notices) available in electronically
accessible formats and means, such as the Internet;
5. Holding any public meetings at convenient and accessible locations and times;
6. Demonstrating explicit consideration and response to public input received during the development
of the LRTP and the TIP;
7. Seeking out and considering the needs of those traditionally underserved by existing transportation
systems, such as low-income and minority households, who may face challenges accessing employment
and other services;
8. Providing an additional opportunity for public comment, if the final LRTP or TIP differs significantly
from the version that was made available for public comment by the MPO and raises new material
issues that interested parties could not reasonably have foreseen from the public involvement efforts;
9. Coordinating with the statewide transportation planning public involvement and consultation
processes; and
10. Periodically reviewing the effectiveness of the public involvement procedures and strategies
contained in the PPP to ensure a full and open participation process.
9.E.1
Packet Pg. 890 Attachment: Amended PPP – Track Changes (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
38 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
When developing the PPP, it is important to allow enough time to receive and respond to public input to
find a balance between addressing appropriate public comments and adopting the LRTP within the
required timeframe, including any meetings or hearings that take place during that time.
A minimum public comment period of 45 calendar days must be provided before the initial or revised
participation plan is adopted by the MPO. Copies of the approved PPP must be provided to the Federal
Highway Administration (FHWA) and the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) for informational purposes;
and must be posted on the Internet to the maximum extent practicable. [23 C.F.R. 450.316(a)(3)]
LRTP AND TIP
When “significant” written and oral comments are received on the draft LRTP and TIP (including the
financial plans) as a result of the participation process in this section or the interagency consultation
process required under the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) transportation conformity
regulations (40 C.F.R. Part 93, Subpart A), a summary, analysis, and report on the disposition of
comments are required to be included in the final LRTP and TIP. [23 C.F.R. 450.316(a)(2)]
When the MPO area includes Indian Tribal lands, the MPO must appropriately involve the Indian Tribal
government(s) in the development of the LRTP and the TIP. [23 C.F.R. 450.316(c)]
The MPO may develop a PPP specific to the LRTP as part of the scope of that project. If this is done, the
PPP for the LRTP must be consistent with the overall PPP of the MPO.
Federal Strategies for Implementing Requirements for LRTP Update for the Florida MPOs, U. S.
Department of Transportation, November 2012. This additional guidance states that for LRTPs, MPO
Boards, their advisory committees, and the public, should have the opportunity to periodically review the
LRTP products, interim tasks, and reports that result in the final LRTP documentation. Furthermore, this
guidance also states that final adopted LRTP documentation should be posted to the Internet, and
available at the MPO offices, no later than 90 days after adoption.
The term, “significant” is used in State statutes and
Federal law but remains undefined.
THE COLLIER MPO DEFINES “SIGNIFICANT” AS ANY
COMMENT THAT COULD POTENTIALLY RESULT IN A
CHANGE TO THE SCOPE OF A PROJECT OR STUDY, TO
REPORTING ON EXISTING CONDITIONS THAT LEADS
TO DEFINING ISSUES AND RECOMMENDING
SOLUTIONS IN TERMS OF PROJECTS OR POLICIES.
9.E.1
Packet Pg. 891 Attachment: Amended PPP – Track Changes (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
39 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
Specific to the TIP, Federal requirements are that the MPO must provide all interested parties with a
reasonable opportunity to comment on the proposed TIP, as required by the PPP. In addition, the MPO
must publish or otherwise make readily available the TIP for public review, including (to the maximum
extent practicable) in electronically accessible formats and means, such as the Internet, as described in
the PPP. [23 C.F.R. 450.326(b)], [23 U.S.C. 134 (i)(6) and (7)]
In the event an MPO revises its TIP, the MPO must always use public participation procedures consistent
with the MPO’s PPP. However, public participation is not required for administrative modifications
unless specifically addressed in the PPP. [23 C.F.R. 450.328(a)]
ANNUAL LIST OF PRIORITIZED PROJECTS
Each MPO annually must prepare a list of project priorities and submit the list to the appropriate FDOT
District by October 1 of each year. The list must have been reviewed by the technical and citizens’
advisory committees and approved by the MPO before submission to the District. The annual list of
project priorities must be based upon project selection criteria that consider, among other items, the
MPO’s public involvement procedures. [s.339.175(8)(b)(5), F.S.]
PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT AND MPO COMMITTEES
Most MPOs consider their standing committees to be a fundamental part of their public involvement
activities. The formation of a technical advisory committee (TAC) and citizens’ advisory committee (CAC)
are required pursuant to s.339.175(6)(d), F.S. and s.339.175(6)(e), F.S.; and formation guidance is
provided in Chapter 2 of the MPO Handbook.
As an alternative to the use of a CAC, Florida Statute provides provisions for MPOs to adopt an alternate
program or mechanism that ensures adequate citizen involvement in the transportation planning
process following approval by FHWA, FTA, and FDOT. MPOs may also consider additional standing
committees as a public involvement activity to address specific needs, such as bicyclists, pedestrians, and
multiuse trails, safety, goods/freight movement, etc. MPOs must address and include their committee
activities in the PPP; and are encouraged to detail how the schedule for meetings, agenda packages, and
actions of the committees will be communicated with the public and how the public can participate in
those meetings.
MOST METROPOLITAN PLANNING
ORGANIZATIONS CONSIDER THEIR STANDING
COMMITTEES TO BE A FUNDAMENTAL PART OF
THEIR PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT ACTIVITIES.
9.E.1
Packet Pg. 892 Attachment: Amended PPP – Track Changes (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
40 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
SUNSHINE LAW
MPOs must provide reasonable notice of meetings and make adequate accommodations to hold open
meetings and provide an opportunity for public input. Minutes of meetings must be available for public
inspections. MPOs are prohibited from holding public meetings at a facility or location that
discriminates on the basis of sex, age, race, creed, color, origin, or economic status; or that otherwise
restrict public access. The statute establishes penalties for violations of these provisions and exceptions
for specific situations. MPOs should consult legal counsel for any questions regarding Florida’s
Government-in-the-Sunshine Law. The notification commitments identified herein comply with the State
Attorney General’s Office publication, “Government In The Sunshine Manual” (2017) Section 4a.
9.E.1
Packet Pg. 893 Attachment: Amended PPP – Track Changes (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
41 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
ACRONYMS
ADA Americans with Disabilities Act
BPAC Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
EJ Environmental Justice
EO Executive Order
FAST Act Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act
FDOT Florida Department of Transportation
FHWA Federal Highway Administration
FTA Federal Transit Administration
LCB Local Coordinating Board
LEP Limited English Proficiency
LRTP Long Range Transportation Plan
MPO Metropolitan Planning Organization (interchangeable with TPO)
PIP Public Involvement Plan (for individual projects)
PPP Public Participation Plan (adopted by the MPO)
TDP Transit Development Plan
TDSP Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan
TIP Transportation Improvement Program
TPO Transportation Planning Organization (interchangeable with MPO)
UPWP Unified Planning Work Program
USC United States Code
9.E.1
Packet Pg. 894 Attachment: Amended PPP – Track Changes (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
42 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
APPENDICES
A. GOVERNMENT TO GOVERNMENT PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT POLICY
B. LEE COUNTY MPO/COLLIER MPO INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT
C. LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY PLAN
D. NONDISCRIMINATION POLICY AND COMPLAINT PROCEDURE
E. TRADITIONALLY UNDERSERVED COMMUNITIES
F. STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES
9.E.1
Packet Pg. 895 Attachment: Amended PPP – Track Changes (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
43 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
APPENDIX A: COLLIER MPO’S GOVERNMENT TO GOVERNMENT
PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT POLICY EFFECTING TRIBAL ENTITIES
9.E.1
Packet Pg. 896 Attachment: Amended PPP – Track Changes (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
44 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
GOVERNMENT TO GOVERNMENT PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT POLICY Adopted June 9, 2017
I. Purpose: To promote Tribal involvement in the MPO planning process; initiate and maintain a positive
working relationship between the MPO and Tribal governments; promote effective collaboration
and communication between the MPO and Tribes;
II. Goals of Tribal Consultation:
• To create durable relationships between the Tribes and the MPO based on a mutual respect that
promotes coordinated transportation partnerships in service to all of our citizens.
• For the MPO to take a proactive approach to consultation by ensuring Tribal participation in MPO
planning processes that may affect Tribal governments, Tribal programs and Tribal citizens.
III. Consultation Requirements
Federal Transportation Planning Requirements
23 USC § 135(f)(2)c applies to FDOT, as follows: “With respect to each area of the State under the
jurisdiction of an Indian Tribal government, the statewide transportation plan shall be developed in
consultation with the Tribal government.”
23 CFR § 450.316(c), Interested parties, participation and consultation, applies to MPOs where an
MPO includes Indian Tribal lands and provides:
• “When the MPO includes Indian Tribal lands, the MPO(s) shall appropriately involve the Indian
Tribal government(s) in the development of the metropolitan transportation plan and the TIP.”
23 CFR § 450.316(e), Interested parties, participation and consultation, provides:
• “MPOs shall, to the extent practicable, develop a documented process(es) that outlines roles,
responsibilities, and key decision points for consulting with other governments and agencies, as
defined in paragraphs (b), (c), and (d) of this section, which may be included in the agreement(s)
developed under § 450.314.”
In addition to the above-referenced consultation requirements, if a Tribe wishes to access federal
transportation funds available to MPOs, the Tribe must do so through the MPO processes as provided
by law.
IV. Definitions
Collaboration: – Indicates a process in which two or more parties work together to achieve a common
set of goals. Collaboration is the timely communication and joint effort that lays the groundwork
for mutually beneficial relationships, including identifying issues and problems, identifying solutions
and providing follow-up as needed.
Communication: - Refers to verbal, electronic or written exchange of information between the MPO
and the Tribe. Generally, posting information on a website or in the newspaper does not constitute
consultation. Written correspondence, whether electronic or letter/postal format, should generally
be sent to the Tribe Chair with a copy to staff, requesting review and comment on specific plans or
9.E.1
Packet Pg. 897 Attachment: Amended PPP – Track Changes (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
45 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
projects that will affect a Tribe. While Tribal review may occur concurrently with public review,
Tribes are not considered the “public” for purposes of such communication.
Consultation – Means that one or more parties confer with other identified parties in accordance with
an established process and, prior to taking action(s), considers the views of the other parties and
periodically informs them about action(s) taken.” (See 23 CFR Part 450 Planning Assistance and
Standards, subpart A §450.104).
Government-to-Government Relations: Refers to an intergovernmental relationship between a
federally-recognized Tribe and the MPO Board during which consultation, meetings, and
communications occur between top-level officials of the MPO and the Tribe.
Tribal Sovereignty: Refers to a unique, political relationship between American Indians and the United
States government that recognizes that Tribes are sovereign nations with recognized powers of self-
government.
V. Tribal Entities
The two Federally-recognized Tribes with land holdings within or abutting Collier County are:
• The Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida, represented by the Business Council,
consisting of Chairman, Assistant Chairman, Treasurer, Secretary, and Lawmaker
Mailing address:
PO Box 440021
Tamiami Station
Miami, Fl 33144
(o) 305-223-8380
• The Seminole Tribe of Florida, represented by the Tribal Council comprised of Chairman, Vice
Chairman, Big Cypress Councilman, Brighton Councilman, and Hollywood Councilman
Mailing address:
Attn: Chairman and General Counsel
6300 Stirling Rd
Hollywood, FL 33024
(o) 239-354-5220 x 11402
VI. Core Principles
1. The MPO wishes to establish a Government-to-Government relationship and communication
protocol in recognition of the principle of Tribal sovereignty.
2. The MPO recognizes that good faith, mutual respect, and trust are fundamental to meaningful
collaboration and communication between governmental entities.
9.E.1
Packet Pg. 898 Attachment: Amended PPP – Track Changes (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
46 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
3. Formal communication and consultation will take place between the MPO Chair or Vice Chair
and the Tribal Chair or Assistant/Vice Chair. Written notification in the form of an email or
letter requesting consultation may be initiated by either the Tribal government or the MPO
and should include the following information:
• Identify the proposed action, program or project requiring consultation; and
• Identify the personnel authorized to consult on behalf of the MPO and the Tribe.
4. Informal Communications may occur between MPO and designated Tribal staff members on
an as-needed basis. The MPO will include designated Tribal staff members or representatives
on email distribution lists to receive notifications of all upcoming MPO advisory committee and
Board meetings. MPO staff will provide convenient access to meeting agendas and packets for
review and be available to answer questions.
VII. Application of Tribal Consultation Policy
1. The MPO will make a good-faith effort to review all proposed plans, policies, rulemakings, actions
or other aspects of the transportation planning process that may affect or impact Tribal resources
and determine whether Tribal consultation or collaboration may assist in the process. The MPO
will notify Tribal governments and inquire whether Tribal consultation should occur. Tribal
Officials have the discretion whether to engage in the consultation process. Consultation will be
initiated by formal, written request.
2. If the MPO does not receive a response from a Tribe requesting a response to a proposed plan,
project or other matter that may affect or impact a Tribal government, the MPO is encouraged to
follow up further with the Tribal government to ascertain its level of interest. If no response is
provided, the MPO believes that it is only appropriate to move forward after the following: (a)
directly contacting a Tribal government authorized representative to solicit its participation,
review and comment after providing sufficient time for the Tribe’s review and response; (b) that
the direct communication/request for information or comment include a date when the MPO
would like the response; and (c) that a minimum of thirty (30) days be provided for the Tribal
government to provide for requests for information, or review and comment on draft documents.
3. The MPO recognizes that formal consultation may not be required in all situations or interactions.
Tribal staff members and MPO staff may communicate on an as-needed basis. These
communications do not negate the authority of the MPO and the Tribes to pursue formal
consultation.
4. This policy will not diminish any administrative or legal remedies otherwise available by law to
the MPO or the Tribe. This policy shall not be construed to waive the sovereign immunity of any
party or create a cause of action for either party for failing to comply with this policy.
5. This policy is a working document and may be revised as needed. The MPO will consult
periodically with the Tribes to evaluate its effectiveness and determine the need for revision.
6. The policy shall become effective upon the date signed by the MPO Chair following approval by
the MPO Board.
9.E.1
Packet Pg. 899 Attachment: Amended PPP – Track Changes (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
47 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
APPENDIX B: LEE COUNTY MPO/COLLIER MPO INTERLOCAL
AGREEMENT
9.E.1
Packet Pg. 900 Attachment: Amended PPP – Track Changes (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
48 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
9.E.1
Packet Pg. 901 Attachment: Amended PPP – Track Changes (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
49 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
2018 AMENDMENT TO
9.E.1
Packet Pg. 902 Attachment: Amended PPP – Track Changes (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
50 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
9.E.1
Packet Pg. 903 Attachment: Amended PPP – Track Changes (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
51 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
9.E.1
Packet Pg. 904 Attachment: Amended PPP – Track Changes (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
52 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
9.E.1
Packet Pg. 905 Attachment: Amended PPP – Track Changes (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
53 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
INTERLOCAL
AGREEMENT FOR JOINT REGIONAL
TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AND COORDINATION BETWEEN
THE COLLIER AND LEE COUNTY MPOs
9.E.1
Packet Pg. 906 Attachment: Amended PPP – Track Changes (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
54 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
This INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT (hereinafter the Agreement) is made and entered into as of as of the date
last signed below by and between the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization (hereinafter the Collier
MPO) and the Lee County Metropolitan Planning Organization (hereinafter the Lee County MPO).
Whereas, the Lee County and Collier Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) are the duly
designated and constituted agencies responsible for carrying out the metropolitan transportation
planning and programming processes for the Cape Coral and Bonita Springs-Naples Urbanized Areas;
and
Whereas, the 2000 Census, while identifying distinct and separate Bonita Springs-Naples and Cape Coral
Urbanized Areas, also determined that the Naples Urbanized Area had expanded into the metropolitan
planning area of the Lee County MPO to become the Bonita Springs-Naples Urbanized Area; and
Whereas, the elected and appointed officials comprising the policy boards of the Collier MPO and the
Lee County MPO recognize the benefits of regional cooperation; and
Whereas, on October 17, 2002, at a joint meeting, the members of the Collier MPO and Lee County
MPO voted unanimously for staff not to pursue consolidation of the MPOs or alter their common
metropolitan planning area boundary; and
Whereas, on October 17, 2002, at a joint meeting, the members of the Collier MPO and Lee County
MPO voted unanimously for staff to coordinate transportation planning and policy activities in this bi-
county region to promote regional transportation solutions and enhance overall regional transportation
system efficiency using a straightforward, resourceful method; and
Whereas, the parties agree that the MPOs should continue coordination efforts by having a member of
each MPO’s staff serve as a voting member of the other’s technical advisory committee and by holding
joint MPO policy board meetings on an as-needed basis and when necessary to resolve otherwise
irresolvable differences; and
Whereas, staff and policy board members from both the Collier and Lee County MPOs also already
coordinate regional transportation issues through participation in the Metropolitan Planning
Organization Advisory Council (MPOAC), the District One Coordinated Urban Transportation Studies
(CUTS) Committee, and the Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council (SWFRPC); and
Whereas, the Collier and Lee County MPOs executed an agreement on January 27, 2004 and amended it
in January 2006 to develop a joint regional long range transportation plan and joint long range regional
transportation priorities; and
Whereas, the Collier and Lee County MPOs executed an amended agreement on March 20, 2009 to
update the joint coordination activities to match the current requirements and processes at the time;
and
Whereas, certain provisions of the amended Agreement now need updating;
9.E.1
Packet Pg. 907 Attachment: Amended PPP – Track Changes (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
55 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants made by each party to the other and of the mutual
benefits to be realized by the parties hereto, the Collier MPO and Lee County MPO hereby agree as
follows:
Section 1. Authority. This Interlocal Agreement is entered into pursuant to the general
authority of Sections 339.175, Florida Statutes, relating to metropolitan planning organizations, and
163.01, Florida Statutes, relating to interlocal agreements.
Section 2. Purpose. The purpose of this Agreement is to promote and establish a forum for
communication and coordination between the Collier and Lee County MPOs and to foster joint regional
cooperation and conduct regarding transportation planning in accordance with Section 339.175, Florida
Statutes, 23 C.F.R. 450.312, and the goals and requirements of current applicable Federal transportation
appropriations legislation. More specifically, this Agreement establishes the commitment by the parties
to develop joint regional transportation planning products and processes for the bi-county region of
Collier and Lee Counties and provides targeted timeframes for the accomplishment of these products
and processes.
Section 3. Staff–level Coordination. Each party will continue to maintain a representative of
the other party’s staff agency as a voting member of its Technical Advisory Committee.
Section 4. Joint Meetings and Quorum Requirements. Joint meetings of the governing boards, and
advisory committees of the Collier and Lee County MPOs will be held at least annually. Quorum
requirements for each MPO’s Technical Advisory Committee at the joint meetings will be consistent with
their respective bylaws, after leaving out the SWFRPC and MPO staff representatives from the quorum
calculations. However, during voting on any items, while the SWFRPC representatives will each have a
single vote, MPO representatives will abstain from voting as they provide the administrative support at
these meetings. Quorum requirements for each MPO’s Citizens Advisory Committee and Bicycle-
Pedestrian Advisory Committee at the joint meetings will be as established for each committee under
their respective MPO bylaws.
Section 5. Planning Products and Timeframes. The parties hereby agree to coordinate and
collaborate in good faith and with due diligence to develop the following joint regional planning
products by the target dates set out by each product described below:
(a) Joint Regional Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)
The parties will continue to maintain and update as necessary the Joint Regional
Multi-Modal Transportation System. The system will continue to remain a
component of each MPO’s LRTP and will continue to identify a network of
regionally significant transportation corridors, facilities, and services. The two
MPOs continue to participate in the development and implementation of the
FDOT Districtwide Florida Standard Urban Transportation Model Structure
(FSUTMS) through the Coordinated Urban Transportation Studies (CUTS)
meetings and coordination with FDOT.
9.E.1
Packet Pg. 908 Attachment: Amended PPP – Track Changes (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
56 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
Each MPO has adopted a 2040 LRTP. The 2045 LRTP is due to be adopted in
2020. During the development of each MPO’s 2045 LRTP update, the parties
agree to identify where improvements may be needed, to propose and test
appropriate alternative system improvements, and update the current joint
regional long range transportation plan addressing those needs. The parties
further agree to incorporate this regional plan in the updates of their own
LRTPs, and to agree on any refinements or modifications to the regional plan
that either MPO may wish to include in its LRTP prior to or concurrent with the
adoption of their LRTPs. The joint regional long range transportation plan shall
be published in and adopted as part of each MPO’s LRTP. The target date for
adoption of the initial LRTPs thus coordinated is December 2020.
The parties agree that amendments to their LRTPs affecting the joint regional long
range transportation plan must be approved by both MPOs’ governing boards.
(b) Joint Regional Project Priorities
On the basis of the Joint Regional Multi-Modal Transportation System addressed
in paragraph 5(a) above, the MPOs agree to continue adopting priorities for
funding unprogrammed improvements on the network that will be competing for
statewide discretionary funding within the next six fiscal years and include said
projects in the respective MPO’s project priorities adopted in the summer. The
MPOs also agree to continue adopting priorities jointly for improvements to
transportation facilities and services on the identified regional network that are
competing for funding through the state’s Transportation Regional Incentive
Program (TRIP). Both sets of Joint Regional Project Priorities must be adopted by
each MPO’s governing board. Either MPO governing board may require that the
Joint Regional Project Priorities be reconsidered at any time. This collaboration
and the products developed will recur each subsequent year during the duration
of this Agreement and will be a continuing obligation and commitment.
(c) Joint Regional Public Involvement Process Component
The parties will collaborate to maintain the Joint Regional Public Involvement
Component which shall continue to be included in each MPO’s existing Public
Involvement Plan. This Joint Regional Component prescribes public notice and
outreach actions and measures to assure public access and involvement for all
joint regional activities including development of the Joint Regional Long Range
Transportation Plan component and annual regional priority list within the bi-
county area. Any amendments to this Joint Regional Public Involvement
Process Component must be approved by both MPO’s governing boards.
(d) Joint Regional Web Page
The parties will collaborate to maintain the Collier and Lee County MPO Joint Regional
Web Page. The Web Page is hosted in the Lee County MPO Web Site and maintained
and updated as necessary by Lee County MPO staff. A link to this web page will
continue to be provided in the Collier MPO Web Site.
Formatted: Indent: Left: 1", Space After: 10 pt
9.E.1
Packet Pg. 909 Attachment: Amended PPP – Track Changes (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
57 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
Section 6. Staff Services and Costs. The directors and staffs of each MPO will be
responsible for development and maintenance of the joint regional products identified
in this Agreement, subject to review and final approval by each MPO governing board.
In this regard, each MPO will cooperate to assign and share equitably the needed staff
resources to accomplish these regional efforts as specified in their respective Unified
Planning Work Programs (UPWP). The cost of staff or consultant services provided by
one party for the mutual benefit of both parties shall be split between the parties in
proportion to their annual allocations of FHWA planning funds as shown in their latest
adopted Unified Planning Work Programs. Similarly, direct costs for the joint regional
efforts and products identified in this Agreement will be split between the parties in
proportion to their annual allocations of FHWA planning funds.
Either party may also provide staff services to, or provide for the use of its consultants
by, the other party, in which event the benefiting party shall reimburse the party
providing the services for its full cost of the services rendered, including any associated
direct expenses and any applicable share of personnel benefits and allocated indirect
costs. The parties agree to invoice each other at the end of each monthly or quarterly
accounting period for all expenses thus incurred on the other’s behalf during that
period. The parties further agree, as may be necessary in order to carry out the terms
and commitments of this Agreement, to cooperate in seeking federal, state and local
funding for the joint regional products to be developed.
Section 7. Conflict Resolution. The parties to this Agreement concur that if an issue is
otherwise irresolvable, their staffs will organize a joint meeting of the MPO governing
boards to resolve said matter. If the parties are unable to resolve the issue at the joint
meeting, they agree to submit the issue to the Southwest Florida Regional Planning
Council for non-binding arbitration. Notwithstanding any such resolution process, the
parties to this agreement do not waive their respective rights to seek declaratory
judgment as provided in Chapter 86, Florida Statutes.
Section 8. Duration of Agreement. This Agreement shall have an initial term of five (5)
years, commencing on the date first above written, and shall automatically renew at the
end of five (5) years for an additional five (5)-year term and every five years thereafter
unless terminated or rescinded as set out in Section 10, herein. Prior to the end of each
five (5)-year term, the parties shall reexamine the terms hereof for possible
amendment. However, the failure to amend or reaffirm the terms of this Agreement
shall not invalidate or otherwise terminate this Agreement.
Section 9. Modification. This Agreement may be modified at any time, but only by a
new or addendum interlocal agreement duly signed by both parties.
Section 10. Termination-Rescission. This Agreement shall continue in force unless
terminated with or without cause by either party by providing thirty (30) days written
notice to the other party.
Section 11. Liability. The parties agree that nothing created or contained in this Agreement
shall be construed, interpreted or inferred to establish any joint liability amongst or between one or
more of the parties by the actions or omissions of its individual employees or agents acting pursuant to
Formatted: Indent: Left: 1", First line: 0", Space After: 10 pt, Tab stops: 1.5", Left
9.E.1
Packet Pg. 910 Attachment: Amended PPP – Track Changes (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
58 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
the terms of this Agreement. In this regard, each party agrees that it shall be solely responsible and
bear its own cost of defending any claim or litigation arising out of the acts or omissions of its employees
or agents for actions or omissions in carrying out the terms and provisions of this Agreement. Finally,
pursuant to Section 768.28, Florida Statutes each party agrees to indemnify, hold harmless and defend
the other party against any claims or causes of action based upon the individual acts or omissions of its
employees or agents.
Section 12. Notice. Any notice provided for herein, including the written notice referenced in
Section 10 above, shall be provided by Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested, to the other party’s
representatives listed below at the following addresses:
Director Director
Collier MPO Lee County MPO
2885 South Horseshoe Drive P.O. Box 150045
Naples, Florida 34104 Cape Coral, Florida 33915-0045
Notice shall be deemed received on the first business day following actual receipt of the notice.
The parties will promptly notify the other in writing of any change to their respective addresses.
As required by Section 163.01(11), Florida Statutes, this Interlocal Agreement and all future
amendments hereto shall be filed with the Clerks of the Circuit Courts of Collier and Lee Counties,
Florida.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties herein have executed this Agreement by their duly authorized
officials as of the day and year written below.
_____________________________ ____________________________________
Commissioner Penny Taylor, Chair Councilman Rick Williams, Chair
Collier MPO Lee County MPO
________________________________ _______________________________
Date: ____________________________ Date: ___________________________
Approved as to form and legality:
9.E.1
Packet Pg. 911 Attachment: Amended PPP – Track Changes (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
59 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
______________________________________
Scott R. Teach, Deputy Collier County Attorney
______________________________________
Derek Rooney, Lee County MPO Attorney
9.E.1
Packet Pg. 912 Attachment: Amended PPP – Track Changes (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
60 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
APPENDIX C. Limited English Proficiency Plan
9.E.1
Packet Pg. 913 Attachment: Amended PPP – Track Changes (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
61 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY PLAN
The Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) is responsible for a continuing, cooperative, and
comprehensive transportation planning process in Collier County (as well as a small portion of Lee County
included in the MPO’s Planning Area). This planning process guides the use of federal and state dollars
spent on existing and future transportation projects or programs, and the Limited English Proficiency
(LEP) Plan plays an integral role in this process. This document will detail the LEP Plan, developed in
conjunction with best practice standards for public involvement.
Introduction
On August 11, 2000, President William J. Clinton signed an executive order, Executive Order 13166:
Improving Access to Service for Persons with Limited English Proficiency, to clarify Title VI of the Civil
Rights Act of 1964. Its purpose was to ensure accessibility to programs and services to eligible persons
who are not proficient in the English language.
This executive order stated that individuals who do not speak English well and who have a limited ability
to read, write, speak, or understand English are entitled to language assistance under Title VI of the Civil
Rights Act of 1964 with respect to a particular type of service, benefit, or encounter. It reads in part,
“Each Federal agency shall prepare a plan to improve access to its federally conducted
programs and activities by eligible LEP persons. Each plan shall be consistent with the
standards set forth in the LEP Guidance and shall include the steps the agency will take to
ensure that eligible LEP persons can meaningfully access the agency's programs and
activities.”
Not only do all federal agencies have to develop LEP Plans, as a condition of receiving federal financial
assistance, but also state and local recipients are required to comply with Title VI and LEP guidelines of
the federal agency from which they receive funds.
Federal financial assistance includes grants, training, use of equipment, donations of surplus property and
other assistance. Recipients of federal funds range from state and local agencies to nonprofits and other
organizations. Title VI covers a recipient's entire program or activity. This means all components of a
recipient's operations are covered. Simply put, any organization that receives federal financial assistance
is required to follow this Executive Order.
The US Department of Transportation (DOT) published: “Policy Guidance Concerning Recipients’
Responsibilities to Limited English Proficient Person” in the December 14, 2005 Federal Register. The
guidance explicitly identifies MPOs as organizations that must follow this guidance:
The guidance applies to all DOT funding recipients, which include state departments of
transportation, state motor vehicle administrations, airport operators, metropolitan
planning organizations, and regional, state, and local transit operators, among many
others. Coverage extends to a recipient’s entire program or activity, i.e., to all parts of a
recipient’s operations. This is true even if only one part of the recipient receives the Federal
assistance. For example, if DOT provides assistance to a state department of
9.E.1
Packet Pg. 914 Attachment: Amended PPP – Track Changes (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
62 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
transportation to rehabilitate a particular highway on the National Highway System, all
of the operations of the entire state department of transportation—not just the particular
highway program or project—are covered by the DOT guidance.
The intent of this Limited English Proficiency Plan is to ensure access to the planning process and
information published by the MPO where it is determined that a substantial number of residents in the
Collier MPO Planning Area do not speak or read English proficiently. The production of multilingual
publications and documents and/or interpretation at meetings or events will be provided to the degree
that funding permits based on current laws and regulations.
Laws and Policies Guiding Limited English Proficiency Plans
As part of Metropolitan Planning Organization certification by the Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA) and the Federal Transit Administration (FTA), the LEP Plan will be assessed and
evaluated. The following matrix illustrates these laws, policies and considerations:
Rights A
Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
Limited English Proficiency Executive Order
13166
Federal Law Federal Policy
Enacted in 1964 Enacted in August 2000
Considers all persons Considers eligible population
Contains monitoring and oversight compliance
review requirements
Contains monitoring and oversight compliance
review requirements
Factor criteria is required, no numerical or
percentage thresholds
Factor criteria is required, no numerical or
percentage thresholds
Provides protection on the basis of race, color, and
national origin
Provides protection on the basis of national origin
Focuses on eliminating discrimination in federally
funded programs
Focuses on providing LEP persons with meaningful
access to services using four factor criteria
Annual Accomplishment and Upcoming Goals
Report to FHWA
Annual Accomplishment and Upcoming Goals
Report to FHWA
Who is an LEP individual?
As defined in the 2000 United States Census, it is any Individual who speaks a language at home other
than English as his/her primary language, and who speaks or understands English ‘not well’ or ‘not at all’.
Determining the need
As a recipient of federal funding, the MPO must take reasonable steps to ensure meaningful access to the
information and services it provides. As noticed in the Federal Register/ Volume 70, Number 239/
Wednesday, December 14, 2005/ Notices, there are four factors to consider in determining “reasonable
steps”.
• Factor 1 - The number and proportion of LEP persons in the eligible service area;
• Factor 2 - The frequency with which LEP persons encounter MPO programs;
9.E.1
Packet Pg. 915 Attachment: Amended PPP – Track Changes (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
63 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
• Factor 3 - The importance of the service provided by MPO programs;
• Factor 4 - The resources available and overall cost to the MPO.
The DOT Policy Guidance gives recipients of federal funds substantial flexibility in determining what
language assistance is appropriate based on a local assessment of the four factors listed above. The
following is an assessment of need in Collier MPO’s Planning Area in relation to the four factors and the
transportation planning process.
LEP Assessment for the Collier MPO
Factor 1. The Number and proportion of LEP persons in the eligible service area
The first step towards understanding the profile of individuals who could participate in the transportation
planning process is a review of Census data. Tables 1 and 2 on the following pages display the primary
language spoken and number of individuals that are LEP. In Collier County, between 2010 and 2016, the
number of people who speak a language other than English at home increased by 16,000 while the
number of people who speak English less than “very well” decreased by 1,000.
For our planning purposes, we are considering people that speak English ‘less than very well’ and only the
top four language groups are included in the analysis.
Table 1, derived from the 2016 American Community Survey (ACS) 5-year Estimates conducted by the US
Census, shows the number and percent of the population, with regard to their English language skills, for
the cities and unincorporated portions of Collier County as well as for the County as a whole. In
unincorporated Collier County, 15.7% of the population age 5 years or older speak English less than “very
well”, compared to 14.5 for the entire County 2
Table 1: Limited English Proficient Persons in the MPO Planning area and local jurisdictions
2016 American Community Survey – US Census - 5-year estimates
Jurisdiction Population
Population
5 years and
over
Number of LEP
Persons (5
years and over)
Percentage of
LEP Persons (5
years and over)
Everglades City 232 228 11 4.8%
City of Naples 20,980 20,510 828 4.0%
City of Marco Island 17,361 17,135 1,115 6.5%
Unincorporated Collier County
309,663 293,645 46,143 15.7%
Collier County 348,236 331,518 48,097 14.5%
Table 2 shows the number and percent of LEP persons by language spoken at the individual’s home. Of
the LEP persons within Collier County, 23.4% speak Spanish at home making this the most significant
percentage of the area’s population. The second most common language at home is Other Indo-European
2 2016 American Community Survey (ACS) 5-year Estimates, Tables B01003, S1601.
9.E.1
Packet Pg. 916 Attachment: Amended PPP – Track Changes (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
64 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
languages at 7.8%; Asian and Pacific Islander languages represent 0.9% of the “other” languages spoken
at home.
Table 2: Language Spoken at Home by LEP Persons - Collier MPO Planning Area
2016 American Community Survey, 5-year Estimates, US Census
LEP Persons
Spanish
Language
Other Indo-
European
Languages
Asian &
Pacific
Islander
Languages
Other
Languages
5 years and over - Everglades City 9 7 0 0
5 years and over - City of Naples 658 1,216 83 14
5 years and over - Marco Island 1,162 1,006 176 71
5 years and over – Unincorporated County 75,843 23,630 2,750 764
5 years and over - Total 77,672 25,859 3,009 849
Percent of Total Population 5 years and over 23.4% 7.8% 0.9% 0.3%
Factor 2. The frequency in which LEP Persons encounter MPO programs
The MPO documents phone inquiries, public meetings and office visits. To date, the MPO has had no
requests for interpreters and no requests for translated program documents or publications by either
individuals or groups.
Factor 3. The importance of the service provided by the MPO program
MPO programs use federal funds to plan for future transportation projects, and therefore do not include
any direct service or program that requires vital, immediate or emergency assistance, such as medical
treatment or services for basic needs (like food or shelter). Further, the MPO does not conduct required
activities such as applications, interviews or other activities prior to participation in its programs or events.
Involvement by any citizen with the MPO or its committees is voluntary.
However, the MPO must ensure that all segments of the population, including LEP persons, have been
involved or have had the opportunity to be involved in the transportation planning process to be
consistent with the goal of the Federal Environmental Justice program and policy. The impact of proposed
transportation investments on underserved and under-represented population groups is part of the
evaluation process in use of federal funds in three major areas for the MPO:
• the biennial Unified Planning Work Program,
• the five-year Transportation Improvement Program,
• the Long-Range Transportation Plan, covering 20+ years.
Inclusive public participation is a priority consideration in other MPO plans, studies and programs as well.
The impacts of transportation improvements resulting from these planning activities have an impact on
all residents. Understanding and continued involvement are encouraged throughout the process. The
9.E.1
Packet Pg. 917 Attachment: Amended PPP – Track Changes (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
65 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
MPO is concerned with input from all stakeholders and makes every effort to ensure that the planning
process is as inclusive as possible.
As a result of the long range
transportation planning process,
selected projects receive approval for
federal funding and progress towards
project planning and construction
under the responsibility of local
jurisdictions or state transportation
agencies. These state and local
organizations have their own policies
to ensure LEP individuals can
participate in the process that shapes
where, how and when a specific
transportation project is implemented.
Factor 4. The resources available and overall MPO cost
Given the size of the LEP population in the MPO area, the current financial constraints of the MPO and
the expense of full multi-language translations of large transportation plan documents and maps which
have frequent changes and are not often used by the public, translation of MPO documents is not
considered to be warranted at this time.
The MPO will continue efforts to collaborate with state and local agencies to provide language translation
and interpretation services when practical and funding is available. Spanish and other language outreach
materials from organizations such as federal, state, and local transportation agencies will be used when
possible. The MPO will monitor increases in the LEP population and adjust its LEP policy accordingly. If
warranted in the future, the MPO will consider new techniques to reach the LEP population, such as (1)
the translation of executive summaries for key MPO documents, such as the Long Range Transportation
Plan, the Transportation Improvement Program, and the Public Involvement Plan, and (2) the translation
of document summaries, brochures or newsletters, which are designed to capture significant points of
the full document. Additionally, the MPO currently has an employee that is fluent in both English and
Spanish. In addition, Collier County Growth Management Division and the Alternative Transportation
Modes Department have employees fluent in English, Spanish and Haitian Creole, and are available as
interpreters as needed.
MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS
Engaging the diverse population within the MPO area is important. The MPO is committed to providing
quality services to all citizens, including those with limited English proficiency. All language access
activities detailed below will be coordinated in collaboration with the MPO Board and staff.
Safe Harbor Stipulation
Federal law provides a ‘safe harbor’ stipulation so recipients of federal funding can ensure compliance
with their obligation to provide written translations in languages other than English with greater certainty.
A ‘safe harbor’ means that as long as a recipient (the MPO) has created a plan for the provision of written
TRANSLATION OF MPO DOCUMENTS IS NOT
CONSIDERED TO BE WARRANTED AT THIS TIME.
THE MPO WILL CONTINUE EFFORTS TO
COLLABORATE WITH STATE AND LOCAL AGENCIES
TO PROVIDE LANGUAGE TRANSLATION AND
INTERPRETATION SERVICES WHEN PRACTICAL
AND FUNDING IS AVAILABLE
9.E.1
Packet Pg. 918 Attachment: Amended PPP – Track Changes (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
66 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
translations under a specific set of circumstances, such action will be considered strong evidence of
compliance with written translation obligations under Title VI.
However, failure to provide written translations under the circumstances does not mean there is
noncompliance, but rather provides for recipients a guide for greater certainty of compliance in
accordance with the four-factor analysis. Evidence of compliance with the recipient’s written translation
obligations under ‘safe harbor’ includes providing written translations of vital documents for each eligible
LEP language group that constitutes 5% or 1,000 persons, whichever is less of eligible persons served or
likely to be affected. (Note: At this time, data on area language groups indicates that this requirement
does not apply.) Translation also can be provided orally. The ‘safe harbor’ provision applies to the
translation of written documents only. It does not affect the requirement to provide meaningful access to
LEP individuals through competent oral interpreters where oral language services are needed and
reasonable to provide.
Providing Notice to LEP Persons
US DOT guidance indicates that once an agency has decided, based on the four factors, to provide
language services, it is important that the recipient notify LEP persons of services available free of charge
in a language the LEP persons would understand. Example methods for notification include:
1. Signage that indicates when free language assistance is available with advance notice;
2. Stating in outreach documents that language services are available;
3. Working with community-based organizations and other stakeholders to inform LEP individuals of
MPO services and the availability of language assistance;
4. Using automated telephone voice mail or menu to provide information about available language
assistance services;
5. Including notices in local publications targeting Spanish-speaking and Haitian-Creole-speaking ng
audiences in languages other than English;
6. Providing notices on non-English-language radio and television about MPO services and the
availability of language assistance; and
7. Providing presentations and/or notices at schools and community-based organizations (CBO).
If deemed essential in the future in light of revised census data, the MPO will publicize the availability of
interpreter services, free of charge, at least 7 days prior to MPO Board and committee meetings,
workshops, forums or events which will be noticed on the MPO website, in meeting notices (packets), and
using the following additional tools as appropriate:
• signage
• public outreach materials
• community-based organizations
• local publications as referenced above
• Non-English-language radio and television
The MPO defines an interpreter as a person who translates spoken language orally, as opposed to a
translator, who translates written language and transfers the meaning of written text from one language
into another. The MPO will request language interpreter services from Collier County staff, as needed,
and will reciprocate by making MPO staff available as needed. As covered under Title VI requirements for
9.E.1
Packet Pg. 919 Attachment: Amended PPP – Track Changes (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
67 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
nondiscrimination, at each meeting, the MPO will provide Title VI material and include this material in an
alternative language when applicable.
Language Assistance
A goal of the PPP is to provide user-friendly materials that will be appealing and easy to understand. The
MPO will provide on an “as needed” basis, executive summaries in alternative formats, such as brochures
or newsletters, depending on the work product.
MPO Staff Training
This LEP Plan is incorporated in the PIP to maintain meaningful access to information and services for LEP
individuals, the MPO will properly train its employees to assist in person, and/or by telephone, LEP
individuals who request assistance. MPO Board members will receive a briefing on the PIP & LEP Plan,
assuring that they are aware of and understand how the PIP implements the LEP Plan.
9.E.1
Packet Pg. 920 Attachment: Amended PPP – Track Changes (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
68 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
APPENDIX D. NONDISCRIMINATION PLAN AND COMPLAINT
PROCEDURE
9.E.1
Packet Pg. 921 Attachment: Amended PPP – Track Changes (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
69 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
Title VI Nondiscrimination Program Policy and Complaint Procedure
Introduction
The Collier MPO is a recipient of federal funds from the U.S. Department of Transportation modal
agencies, including the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and the Federal Transit Administration
(FTA). All recipients of federal funding must comply with the requirements of Title VI of the Civil Rights
Act of 1964 and other nondiscrimination statutes, regulations and authorities. This Implementation Plan
describes how the Department effectuates nondiscrimination in the delivery of its federally assisted
programs, services and activities. The Plan includes the structure of the MPO’s Title VI/Nondiscrimination
program as well as the policies, procedures and practices that the Department uses to comply with
nondiscrimination requirements. The Plan is intended to be a living document, regularly policed and
updated by the Department to meaningfully reflect the program as it changes and grows. Anyone wishing
to provide input into the Department’s Title VI/Nondiscrimination Implementation Plan is encouraged to
contact the Title VI/Nondiscrimination Program Coordinator, Anne McLaughlin at
AnneMcLaughlin@colliercountyfl.gov or 239-252-5884 or by writing at 2885 South Horseshoe Drive,
Naples, FL 34104.
Policy Statement
It is the policy of the MPO to comply with all federal and state authorities requiring nondiscrimination,
including but not limited to Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987,
Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA), the Age
Discrimination Act of 1975 and Executive Order 12898 (Environmental Justice) and 13166 (Limited English
Proficiency). The MPO does not and will not exclude from participation in; deny the benefits of; or subject
anyone to discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, age, disability or income. In
addition, the MPO complies with the Florida Civil Rights Act, and does not permit discrimination on the
basis of religion or family status in its programs, services or activities.
The Collier MPO has adopted the Florida Department of Transportation’s (Department) Title
VI/Nondiscrimination policy and ADA policy by reference. Topic No.:275-010-010-f–Title VI Program and
Related Statutes-Implementation and Review Procedures.
The Department’s Title VI/Nondiscrimination policy and ADA policy statement may be found at: US DOJ
Title VI Nondiscrimination Policy. Those requiring information in alternative formats or in a language
subject to the Department’s Limited English Proficiency (LEP) Plan, should contact the Title
VI/Nondiscrimination Coordinator.
MPO DISCRIMINATION COMPLAINT PROCEDURE
Any person who believes that he or she, or any specific class of persons, has been subjected to
discrimination or retaliation prohibited by the Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, and
related statutes, under the MPO’s planning process may file a written complaint.
The MPO encourages the filing of a complaint in writing which includes a name, address, and other
information so that you may be contacted in regard to the matter. Please see the Title VI Complaint Form.
9.E.1
Packet Pg. 922 Attachment: Amended PPP – Track Changes (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
70 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
The MPO will investigate complaints received no more than 180 days after the alleged incident. The MPO
will process complaints that are complete.
• All complaints will be investigated promptly. Reasonable measures will be undertaken to preserve
any information that is confidential. The MPO’s Title VI Specialist will review every complaint to
determine if our office has jurisdiction.
• Within ten (10) calendar days, the Title VI Specialist will acknowledge receipt of the allegation(s),
inform the Complainant of action taken or proposed action to process the allegation(s), and advise
the Complainant of other avenues of redress available, such as the FDOT’s Equal Opportunity
Office (EOO).
• The MPO has sixty (60) calendar days to investigate the complaint. If more information is needed
to resolve the complaint, the MPO’s Title VI Specialist will contact the complainant. The
complainant has 10 business days from the date of the letter to send the requested information
to the Title VI Specialist. If the Title VI Specialist is not contacted by the complainant or does not
receive the additional information within 15 business days, the MPO may administratively close
the case. A case can also be administratively closed if the complainant no longer wishes to pursue
their case.
• At a minimum, the investigation will:
o Identify and review all relevant documents, practices, and procedures;
o Identify and interview persons with knowledge of the Title VI violation, including the
person making the complaint, witnesses, or anyone identified by the complainant;
anyone who may have been subject to similar activity or anyone with relevant
information.
• Within ninety (90) calendar days of the complaint, the MPO’s Title VI Specialist will issue one of
two letters to the complainant: a closure letter or a letter of finding (LOF). A closure letter
summarizes the allegations and states that there was not a Title VI violation and that the case will
be closed. An LOF summarizes the allegations and the interviews regarding the alleged incident,
and explains whether any disciplinary action, additional training of the staff members or other
action will occur.
• If no violation is found and the complainant wishes to appeal the decision, he/she has fourteen
(14) days after the date of the letter or the LOF to do so.
• If the issue has not been satisfactorily resolved through the MPO’s investigation, or if at any time
the person(s) request(s) to file a formal complaint, the recipient’s MPO Title VI Specialist shall
refer the Complainant to the FDOT’s District One Title VI Coordinator for processing in accordance
with approved State procedures.
• The MPO’s Title VI Specialist will advise the FDOT’s District One Title VI Coordinator within five (5)
calendar days of the completed investigation. The following information will be included in every
notification to the FDOT’s District One Title VI Coordinator:
9.E.1
Packet Pg. 923 Attachment: Amended PPP – Track Changes (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
71 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
(a) Name, address, and phone number of the Complainant.
(b) Name(s) and address(es) of Respondent.
(c) Basis of complaint (i.e., race, color, national origin, sex, age, disability, religion, familial
status or retaliation).
(d) Date of alleged discriminatory act(s).
(e) Date of complaint received by the recipient.
(f) A statement of the complaint.
(g) Other agencies (state, local or Federal) where the complaint has been filed.
(h) An explanation of the actions the recipient has taken or proposed to resolve the
allegation(s) raised in the complaint.
• The MPO’s Title VI Specialist will maintain a log of complaints received by the MPO. The log will
include the following information:
o Name of Complainant
o Name of Respondent
o Basis of Complaint (i.e., race, color, national origin, sex, age, disability, religion, familial
status or retaliation)
o Date complaint was received by the recipient
o Date that the MPO Title VI Specialist notified the FDOT’s District One Title VI Coordinator
of the complaint
o Explanation of the actions the recipient has taken or proposed to resolve the issue raised
in the complaint
The MPO’s planning process is conducted in
accordance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
and Related Statutes. Any person or beneficiary who
believes as part of the MPO planning process they
have been discriminated against because of race,
color, religion, sex, age, national origin, disability, or
familial status may file a complaint with the Collier
MPO Title VI Specialist Anne McLaughlin (239) 252-
5884 by writing Ms. McLaughlin at 2885 South
Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 or via email at:
annemclaughlin@colliergov.net; or by contacting
Brandy Otero, Senior Principal Planner, by phone at
239-252-5859, in writing at the above address, or via
email at:
brandyotero@colliercountyfl.gov.net
Field Code Changed
Formatted: Font color: Hyperlink
9.E.1
Packet Pg. 924 Attachment: Amended PPP – Track Changes (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
72 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
Title VI Complaint Form
Before completing this form, please read the Collier MPO’s Title VI Complaint Procedures
located on our website or by visiting our office.
The following information is necessary and required to assist in processing your complaint. If
you require assistance in completing this form, please contact us at the phone number listed.
Complaints must be filed within 180 calendar days after the date alleged discrimination
occurred.
Complainant’s Name: __________________________________________________________ Address: ________________________________________________________________________ City: __________________________ State: _________________ Zip Code: ______________ Telephone Numbers: Home __________Work: _____________ Cell: ______________ E-mail Address: ________________________________________________________________ Date of alleged discrimination: _______________________________________________ Which of the following best describes the reason you believe the discrimination took place? Was it because of your: Race/Color: ____________ National Origin:____________ Person discriminated against (if someone other than complainant). Please confirm that you have obtained the permission of the aggrieved party if you are filing on behalf of a third party. Name_______________________________________________________________________ Address: ___________________________________________________________________ City: _______________________ State: ___________ Zip Code: _________________ Have you filed this complaint with any other federal, state, or local agency? Yes No If yes, check each box that applies:
9.E.1
Packet Pg. 925 Attachment: Amended PPP – Track Changes (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
73 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN Federal Transit Administration Department of Transportation Dept. of Justice Equal Opportunity Commission Other: _______________________________________________________ Have you filed a lawsuit regarding this complaint? Yes No In your own words, describe the alleged discrimination. Explain what happened and whom you believe was responsible. Include specific details such as names, dates, times, route numbers, witnesses, and any other information that would assist us in our investigation of the allegations. Please also provide any other documentation that is relevant to this complaint. Complainant’s Signature Date
9.E.1
Packet Pg. 926 Attachment: Amended PPP – Track Changes (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
74 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
APPENDIX E – TRADITIONALLY UNDERSERVED COMMUNITIES
9.E.1
Packet Pg. 927 Attachment: Amended PPP – Track Changes (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
75 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
Environmental Justice Communities / Traditionally Underserved Communities
The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) advised the MPO during the quadrennial Transportation
Management Area (TMA) review in 2016 to incorporate an analysis of Environmental Justice Communities
and issues in all new plans and studies. The FHWA advised MPO staff to include the type of analysis
conducted for the MPO’s Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan.
According to guidance published by the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), it is important to
see Environmental Justice as an opportunity to make better transportation decisions by doing the
following:
• Making transportation decisions that meet the needs of all people
• Designing facilities that fit into communities
• Enhancing the public involvement process and strengthening community-based partnerships
• Improving the tools for analyzing the impacts of transportation decisions on minority and low-
income communities
• Partnering with other public and private agencies to leverage resources and achieve a common
vision for communities
MPO staff began by reviewing the MPO’s Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP), Major
Update, adopted October 25, 2013 for maps showing Populations in Poverty, Households with No Vehicles
and Identified Areas of Need as a starting point in identifying disadvantaged communities potentially
underserved by transportation infrastructure and programs within Collier County.
FHWA advised using a variety of resources, and local knowledge to determine the location and needs of
disadvantaged communities. MPO staff augmented the TDSP maps using the following sources:
• US Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS)
• American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Census
Transportation Planning Products (CTPP)
• US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Environmental Justice (EJ) Screening and Mapping Tool
• MPO Advisory Committee review of findings (for local knowledge)
To address the issue of equity in terms of providing equal access to bicycle and pedestrian facilities
County-wide, the MPO’s previous identification of Environmental Justice (EJ) communities was updated
for the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan (2019). The EJ criteria used for the BPMP were minority status,
poverty, no access to a vehicle, and limited ability to speak English. EJ areas were defined as areas where
the criteria were 10% greater than the County average. The map on the following page shows the results
of the EJ analysis. The map may be viewed in larger format on the MPO website.
9.E.1
Packet Pg. 928 Attachment: Amended PPP – Track Changes (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
76 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
Environmental Justice (EJ) Communities, Collier County, 2019
9.E.1
Packet Pg. 929 Attachment: Amended PPP – Track Changes (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
77 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
APPENDIX F – STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES
9.E.1
Packet Pg. 930 Attachment: Amended PPP – Track Changes (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
78 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
APPENDIX F – STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES
9.E.1
Packet Pg. 931 Attachment: Amended PPP – Track Changes (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
79 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
9.E.1
Packet Pg. 932 Attachment: Amended PPP – Track Changes (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
80 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
9.E.1
Packet Pg. 933 Attachment: Amended PPP – Track Changes (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
81 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
9.E.1
Packet Pg. 934 Attachment: Amended PPP – Track Changes (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
82 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
9.E.1
Packet Pg. 935 Attachment: Amended PPP – Track Changes (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
83 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
9.E.1
Packet Pg. 936 Attachment: Amended PPP – Track Changes (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
84 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
9.E.1
Packet Pg. 937 Attachment: Amended PPP – Track Changes (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
85 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
9.E.1
Packet Pg. 938 Attachment: Amended PPP – Track Changes (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
86 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
9.E.1
Packet Pg. 939 Attachment: Amended PPP – Track Changes (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
87 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
9.E.1
Packet Pg. 940 Attachment: Amended PPP – Track Changes (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
88 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
Add: Distribute press releases
9.E.1
Packet Pg. 941 Attachment: Amended PPP – Track Changes (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
89 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
9.E.1
Packet Pg. 942 Attachment: Amended PPP – Track Changes (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
90 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
Monthly Newsletter
Enhanced – expand semi-annual to monthly
newsletter in digital format, hard copies still
provided
9.E.1
Packet Pg. 943 Attachment: Amended PPP – Track Changes (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
91 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
9.E.1
Packet Pg. 944 Attachment: Amended PPP – Track Changes (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
92 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
APPENDIX G – GROUPS, BUSINESSES, & AGENCIES CONSULTED WITH
IN DEVELOPING THIS PLAN
The following groups, businesses and agencies are members of the MPO’s Adviser Network, along with
roughly 400 private citizens who received notification of the revisions and the opportunity to comment.
Ms. Rae Ann Burton and Ms. April Olson (Conservancy of Southwest Florida) submitted public comments
as shown in Appendix H.
Federal Lands Management Agencies
• National Park Service (Everglades National Park and Big Cypress National Preserve)
• US Fish and Wildlife Service (Florida Panther National Wildlife Refuge, Ten Thousand Islands
National Wildlife Refuge)
State Land Management Agencies
• National Estuarine Research Reserve – Rookery Bay and Cape Romano – Ten Thousand Islands
Aquatic Preserve
• Collier-Seminole State Park
• Picayune Strand State Forest
• Fakahatchee Strand Preserve State Park
• Delnor-Wiggins Pass State Park
• Okaloacoochee Slough State Forest
• South Florida Water Management District
• Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission
Land Management Nonprofit Agencies
• National Audubon Society – Corkscrew Swamp Sanctuary
Native American Tribes
• Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida, Business Council
• Seminole Tribe of Florida, Chairman and General Counsel
MPO Advisory Committees
• Citizens Advisory Committee
• Technical Advisory Committee
MPO Adviser Network
Formatted: Font: Bold
Formatted: List Paragraph, Bulleted + Level: 1 +Aligned at: 0.25" + Indent at: 0.5"
Formatted: Font: Bold
Formatted: Font: Bold
9.E.1
Packet Pg. 945 Attachment: Amended PPP – Track Changes (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
93 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
• Immokalee and Bayshore Community Redevelopment Agencies
• Everglades Coordinating Council
• Bike/Walk Lee County
• Collier County Sheriff’s office
• Lighthouse of Collier
• Conservancy of Southwest Florida
• Naples Pathways Coalition
• Collier Homeless Coalition
• City of Bonita Springs
• Blue Zones Initiative of Southwest Florida
• Community Transportation Safety Team – Collier County
• Florida American Society of Landscape Architects
• South Florida Water Management District
• Golden Gate Estates Area Community Association
• National Alliance for Mental Illness – Naples
• St. Matthews House
• Audubon
• Collier Public Schools
• Arthrex
Formatted: Font: Not Bold
Formatted: Bulleted + Level: 1 + Aligned at: 0.25" +Indent at: 0.5"
9.E.1
Packet Pg. 946 Attachment: Amended PPP – Track Changes (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
94 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
APPENDIX G: PUBLIC COMMENTS
COMMENT RECEIVED
From: Rae Ann Burton <raburton@embarqmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2020 6:23 PM
To: McLaughlinAnne <Anne.McLaughlin@colliercountyfl.gov>
Subject: Re: Additional Revisions to Public Participation Plan Proposed
Dear Ms. McLaughlin,
How can the public provide input in the MPO meetings if there is no public gathering?
There is also no agendas,for this virtual meetings.
I am concerned that there maybe issues that effect the quality of Collier County and the estates, and
that the developers will use this non-public meetings to further their building of the dense Villages in the
Estates and
get rezoning on residential and agricultural properties as there is no public to protest.
I realize that life must go on, but I also fear that issues that concern the Estates Residents will be
approved without the
the residents knowing.
regards - Keep safe.
Rae Ann Burton
MPO RESPONSE
From: "Anne McLaughlin" <Anne.McLaughlin@colliercountyfl.gov>
To: "raburton" <raburton@embarqmail.com>
Cc: "Brandy Otero" <Brandy.Otero@colliercountyfl.gov>
Sent: Thursday, April 9, 2020 10:26:38 AM
Subject: RE: Additional Revisions to Public Participation Plan Proposed
Good Morning Ms. Burton,
Please rest assured that we will keep everyone on our email distribution lists and visitors to the website
informed about how the public can participate in the virtual meetings and will post and distribute
agenda packets following our normal schedule - one week prior to a meeting. We are also making
provisions in draft form for the MPO Board to vote on in June to revisit decisions made during the
pandemic so that members of the public who don’t have ready access to the internet can also
participate.
Formatted: Left
Formatted: Font: 12 pt, Font color: Auto
Formatted: Font: 12 pt, Bold
9.E.1
Packet Pg. 947 Attachment: Amended PPP – Track Changes (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
95 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
Please don’t hesitate to call or email me or Brandy Otero with any concerns or questions you may have
regarding MPO operations during and after the pandemic.
Regards,
Anne McLaughlin
Executive Director
MS. BURTON’S RESPONSE
Dated 4/9/20
Ms. McLaughlin,
Thank you very much for the information.
Keep Safe
Rae Ann Burton
COMMENT RECEIVED
From: April Olson <AprilO@conservancy.org>
Sent: Friday, May 08, 2020 11:24 AM
To: McLaughlinAnne <Anne.McLaughlin@colliercountyfl.gov>; OteroBrandy
<Brandy.Otero@colliercountyfl.gov>
Subject: Public Participation Plan
Formatted: Font: 12 pt, Font color: Auto
9.E.1
Packet Pg. 948 Attachment: Amended PPP – Track Changes (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
96 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use
extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links.
Hello Anne and Brandy,
I hope all is well with you and the rest of the MPO gang!
I see that you added a list of state and federal agencies to the PPP so those agencies have an
opportunity to participate in the development of the TIP and LRTP. That’s great! I have a few other
suggestions of contacts: FL Division of Forestry, FL Department of Environmental Protection, and Florida
Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. I have seen past comment letters from at least two of
those agencies on proposed road projects. I didn’t see that they were part of the list on page 277 of the
agenda (p. 12 of draft PPP), so I thought I would make that recommendation.
Cheers,
April
April Olson
Senior Environmental Planning Specialist
Conservancy of Southwest Florida
1495 Smith Preserve Way
Naples, FL 34102
(239) 262-0304, Ext 250
MPO RESPONSE
From: McLaughlinAnne <Anne.McLaughlin@colliercountyfl.gov>
Sent: Friday, May 08, 2020 12:13 PM
To: April Olson <AprilO@conservancy.org>
Subject: RE: Public Participation Plan
9.E.1
Packet Pg. 949 Attachment: Amended PPP – Track Changes (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
97 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
Thanks April! I’ll check my records, I may have already contacted them and asked if they wanted to
receive regular updates from us. I only included the agencies who responded yes. But I could ask again.
Anne McLaughlin
Executive Director
Office: 239-252-5884
Cell: 239-919-4378
2885 South Horseshoe Dr.
Naples, FL 34104
MPO FOLLOW-UP
Sent emails on 5/14 to the FL Division of Forestry, FL Department of Environmental Protection, and
Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. As of 6/2/20, only the Florida Fish and Wildlife
Conservation Commission had responded that they would like to be included on the list to receive email
notifications. They have been added to the MPO’s Adviser Network and duly noted within the PPP on
pages 12 and 92.
Formatted: Font: 11 pt, Not Bold, Font color: Auto
Formatted: Left
Formatted: Font: 11 pt, Not Bold
9.E.1
Packet Pg. 950 Attachment: Amended PPP – Track Changes (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
98 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK
9.E.1
Packet Pg. 951 Attachment: Amended PPP – Track Changes (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
333
document
Collier MPO
2885 South Horseshoe Drive
Naples, FL 34104
(239) 252-5814
CollierMPO.com
Public Participation Plan
Scan the QR code with your
smartphone to visit our website.
Adopted June 12, 2020
The MPO’s Public Involvement Coordinator,
Anne McLaughlin, may be reached by phone at
239-252-5884, by cell at 239-919-4378, or by
email at: anne.mclaughlin@colliercountyfl.gov
9.E.2
Packet Pg. 952 Attachment: Amended PPP – Clean Version (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
1 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
COLLIER COUNTY METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION
2885 South Horseshoe Drive
Naples, Florida 34104
www.colliermpo.com
E-mail: colliermpo@colliergov.net
phone: 239-252-5814
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The preparation of this document has been financed in part through grants from the Federal Highway
Administration and the Federal Transit Administration, the U.S. Department of Transportation, under the
Metropolitan Planning Program, Section 104 (f) of Title 23, U.S. Code, and local funding. The contents of
this document do not necessarily reflect the official views or policy of the U.S. Department of
Transportation. Persons consulted with in the development of this Public Participation Plan (PPP) are
acknowledged at the end of the document.
TITLE VI AND RELATED LAWS
The MPO does not discriminate against anyone on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, age, national
origin, disability or family status. For more information on the MPO’s commitment to equity and
nondiscrimination, or to express concerns visit https://www.colliermpo.org/get-involved/civil-
rights/ Anyone requiring special accommodation under the Americans with Disabilities Act or language
interpretation services (free of charge) should contact Anne McLaughlin at least ten (days) prior to the
service date: annemclaughlin@colliercountyfl.gov - (239) 252-5884 - Telerelay 711.
LEARNING FROM OUR COLLEAGUES
This document represents a significant departure from prior versions of Collier MPO’s Public Involvement
Plan adopted in 2013 and revised in 2015 and 2017. Staff reviewed Public Participation Plans produced by
other Florida MPOs to identify elements that were innovative and applicable to Collier MPO’s needs. This
PPP borrows a great deal of material from the Polk Transportation Planning Organization’s 2016 PPP.
Interested readers may wish to view the entire Polk TPO PPP at www.polktpo.com
9.E.2
Packet Pg. 953 Attachment: Amended PPP – Clean Version (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
2 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
Collier MPO places a high value on public involvement. For questions
regarding public involvement and to learn more about how you can get
involved, contact the MPO office at (239) 252-5814.
You Can Make a Difference
There are several ways for you to help shape the future of transportation:
Become a member of Collier MPO’s Adviser Network Page 11
How to submit your comments to the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization Page 15
How to leave comments about a specific plan or study Page 17
Submit an application to serve on an MPO Advisory Committee Page 17
9.E.2
Packet Pg. 954 Attachment: Amended PPP – Clean Version (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
3 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….4
Guiding Principles………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………4
About Us……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………5
What is the Collier MPO Responsible For?.....................................................................................9
Our Planning Partners………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..9
Planning Factors………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………12
Goals, Objectives and Performance Measures…………………………………………………………………………13
Whom We Seek to Consult With………………………………………………………………………………………………14
Having Your Say……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….14
Getting Involved………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………15
Access for All……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………18
Outreach Strategies………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….18
Evaluation………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………,……….22
Required Notification……..………………………………………………………………………………………………………..22
Exceptions to Notification Commitments…………………………………………………………………………………27
Additional Emergency Provisions for Public Involvement…………………………………………………………27
Federal Compliance………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….29
FDOT MPO Handbook Compliance………………………………………………………………………….……………….34
Acronyms…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………38
APPENDICES
A. Government to Government Public Involvement Policy……………………………………………….40
B. Lee County MPO/Collier MPO Interlocal Agreement…………………………………………………….44
C. Limited English Proficiency Plan……………………………………………………………………………………51
D. Nondiscrimination Plan & Complaint Process……………………………………………………………….59
E. Traditionally Underserved Communities………………………………………………………………………65
F. Standard Operating Procedures……………………………………………………………………………………68
G. Persons Consulted With in Developing This Plan……………………………………………………………69
H. Public Comments………………………………………………………………………………………………………….71
9.E.2
Packet Pg. 955 Attachment: Amended PPP – Clean Version (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
4 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
INTRODUCTION
The goal of the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization’s (MPO) Public Involvement Plan is to ensure
that all citizens regardless of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, age, disability, or familial status,
have an equal opportunity to participate in the MPO’s decision-making process. A 1994 Presidential
Executive Order directed every Federal agency to make Environmental Justice part of its mission by
identifying and addressing the effects of all programs, policies, and activities on "minority populations and
low-income populations." The MPO strives to accomplish this by involving the potentially affected public
in MPO outreach programs. MPO staff activities are designed to develop partnerships and enhance the
participation in the transportation planning process, with groups and individuals of “traditionally
underserved” communities. These communities include minorities, low income, the elderly, and persons
with disabilities. Staff activities include, but are not limited to, participation in groups serving these
communities, targeted communications with local media outlets, conducting meetings at convenient
times and in locations that are accessible to transit, when possible, and the publication of MPO documents
in non-technical, accessible formats when needed.
GUIDING PRINCIPLES
The Public Participation Plan (PPP) serves as a framework to the public involvement process in regard to
MPO planning related activities. The plan identifies federal, state and MPO requirements, PPP goals and
objectives, PPP policies, planning activities which require public involvement and the process involved
when providing the public with full access and notice to planning activities. The PPP incorporates the
following guiding principles into the development of any required transportation plans and programs:
Early and continuous public involvement opportunities throughout the planning and
programming process;
Timely information to citizens, affected public agencies, representatives of transportation
agencies, private sector transportation entities and other interested parties, including segments
of the community affected by transportation plans, programs, and projects;
Adequate public notice of public involvement activities and ample time for public review and
comment at key decision points;
Consideration of the needs of the traditionally underserved, including low-income and minority
citizens;
Periodic review of public involvement efforts by the MPO to ensure full and open access to all;
Review of public involvement procedures by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and
Federal Transit Administration (FTA) when necessary;
Coordination of MPO public involvement processes with statewide efforts whenever possible;
9.E.2
Packet Pg. 956 Attachment: Amended PPP – Clean Version (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
5 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
Reasonable public access to information; and
Consideration and reasonable response to public comments received.
ABOUT US
Established in 1982, the Collier MPO is a federally mandated transportation policy-making organization
composed of locally elected officials from Collier County, City of Naples, City of Marco Island, and the City
of Everglades City. The MPO is tasked to provide both the urban and rural areas of the County with a
Continuing, Cooperative, and Comprehensive (3-C) planning process to ensure that highways, transit,
bicycle, pedestrian and other facilities are properly considered within the context of the overall
transportation needs of the community.
The MPO staff reports directly to the MPO Board and provides information and technical assistance to the
advisory committees. On a regular basis the committees, along with the MPO staff, provide
recommendations to the MPO Board regarding short and long-range planning, implementation of
projects, and related issues. The MPO Board and each of its advisory committees operate under bylaws
approved by the MPO Board. The advisory committees include the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC),
Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC), Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC), Local
Coordinating Board (LCB) and the Congestion
Management Committee (CMC). Members of these
committees, various interested parties and citizens make
up the MPO Master Database of Contacts. The
committees review plans, documents and programs and
provide comments and recommendations during the
development of plans and major studies. Documents
presented to the MPO Board for approval, endorsement
or ratification have typically been reviewed by the TAC and
CAC.
The Collier MPO Board adopted new Vision and Mission statements in 2017. The MPO’s goal is to work
together with the public citizens of the Collier MPO planning area to fulfill the MPO’s Mission and Vision.
Vision Statement
The MPO strives to provide a fully integrated and multi-modal transportation system that safely and
efficiently moves people and goods while promoting economic development and protecting natural and
man-made regional assets.
Mission Statement
9.E.2
Packet Pg. 957 Attachment: Amended PPP – Clean Version (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
6 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
Provide transportation planning leadership through a collaborative effort to maintain a safe, efficient,
integrated, and multi-modal transportation system.
ABOUT THE REGION
The Collier MPO’s jurisdiction includes Collier County and the cities of Naples, Marco Island and Everglades
City.
9.E.2
Packet Pg. 958 Attachment: Amended PPP – Clean Version (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
7 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
Collier County has an estimated 2017 population of 356,774. The 2017 Median Household Income in
Collier County is $62,407 compared with $50,883 for the state of Florida as a whole. The 2017 Percent of
Households Below Poverty Level is 13% in Collier County, compared with 16% for Florida.1
All of Collier County - including the Cities of Naples, Marco Island, and Everglades City – experience a large,
seasonal increase in population and traffic between October and April, with the highest traffic volumes
occurring in the months of February and March. Collier County is expected to continue growing in
population. Approximately 77% of Collier County’s land area is preserved under various conservation
mechanisms combined with State and Federal conservation lands, shown in green on the map below. The
conservation lands provide recreational opportunities and help sustain the natural environment. They
also constrain development.
The protected lands to the southeast buffer Collier County somewhat from the intense traffic impacts and
pressures that interconnectivity with urban areas to the southeast. As a result, Collier County has a
minimal system of Federal Aid Eligible roadways, as shown on the map on the following page, which
somewhat constrains the availability of State and Federal funding for the MPO.
1 2017 American Community Survey (ACS) 5-yr Estimates, Tables S0101, DP03, CP03
9.E.2
Packet Pg. 959 Attachment: Amended PPP – Clean Version (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
8 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
9.E.2
Packet Pg. 960 Attachment: Amended PPP – Clean Version (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
9 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
WHAT IS THE COLLIER MPO RESPONSIBLE FOR?
The Collier MPO is required under State and Federal laws to develop the following documents:
1. Long-Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) – updated every five years, required to address a
minimum time horizon of 20 years. The LRTP identifies needed improvements to the
transportation network and provides a long-term investment framework that addresses current
and future transportation needs. The LRTP must be multimodal and include, at a minimum,
roadway, bicycle and pedestrian and transit infrastructure improvements.
2. Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) – identifies transportation projects and priorities
that will be pursued over the next five years.
3. Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) – a two-year plan that identifies funding sources for
each MPO planning activity and a schedule of activities
4. Public Participation Plan (PPP) – provides a framework for public involvement in regard to
MPO planning related activities.
OUR PLANNING PARTNERS
MPO BOARD (BOARD)
The MPO Board establishes transportation policies and evaluates transportation needs for the area. The
Board is comprised of 9 elected officials, including all 5 County Commissioners, 2 City Council members
representing the City of Naples, 1 City Council member representing the City of Marco Island and 1 City
Council member representing Everglades City. The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) attends
and participates in all MPO Board meetings.
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (FDOT)
FDOT and the MPO work closely together and have a long-standing partnership. The majority of the MPO’s
funding comes through FDOT. The Department also provides guidance and assistance as needed and
informs the MPO of new or different requirements and practices.
STATE AND FEDERAL LAND MANAGEMENT AGENCIES
When developing the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Long Range Transportation Plan
(LRTP), the MPO consults with agencies and officials responsible for other planning activities within the
MPO’s jurisdiction that are affected by transportation, government agencies and non-profit organizations
that receive Federal assistance from a source other than that the US Department of Transportation to
provide non-emergency transportation services, Indian Tribal governments(s), State and Federal land
Management Agencies. For consultation with Tribal Governments, see section on Intergovernmental
Coordination Below. See P27 Requirements for Public Participation Plan for applicable code citations. The
9.E.2
Packet Pg. 961 Attachment: Amended PPP – Clean Version (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
10 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
MPO has added contact information for the following Federal and State agencies to the email distribution
list(s) to ensure their opportunity to participate in the development of the TIP and LRTP:
Federal Lands Management Agencies
• National Park Service (Everglades National Park and Big Cypress National Preserve)
• US Fish and Wildlife Service (Florida Panther National Wildlife Refuge, Ten Thousand Islands
National Wildlife Refuge)
State Land Management Agencies
• National Estuarine Research Reserve – Rookery Bay and Cape Romano – Ten Thousand Islands
Aquatic Preserve
• Collier-Seminole State Park
• Picayune Strand State Forest
• Fakahatchee Strand Preserve State Park
• Delnor-Wiggins Pass State Park
• Okaloacoochee Slough State Forest
• South Florida Water Management District
• Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission
Land Management Nonprofit Agencies
• National Audubon Society – Corkscrew Swamp Sanctuary
TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE (TAC)
The TAC is composed of professional staff of member entities. The TAC advises the MPO on technical
matters, promotes coordination among member agencies regarding transportation planning and
programming, reviews MPO products for technical sufficiency, accuracy and completeness, makes priority
recommendations for the LRTP, TIP, UPWP and provides technical analyses on other transportation
planning issues.
CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE (CAC)
The CAC advises the MPO by reviewing, reacting to, and providing comment on transportation planning
issues and needs from the citizens’ perspectives. The CAC consists of voting members appointed by the
MPO Board to represent various regions and jurisdictions, the disabled, minorities and groups having civic,
community and economic interests.
BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE (BPAC)
The BPAC provides citizen input on bicycle and pedestrian related issues within the community, advises
on developing a Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan that is responsive to the needs of the community,
9.E.2
Packet Pg. 962 Attachment: Amended PPP – Clean Version (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
11 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
recommends policies that will improve the walking and bicycling environment, recommend priorities for
bicycle and pedestrian projects and program implementation. Members are appointed by the MPO Board
to represent a broad cross-section of Collier County residents, neighborhoods and to include bike/ped
safety professions, transit riders, local advocacy groups, organizations that encourage active
transportation from a community health perspective and advocates for persons with disabilities and other
transportation disadvantaged populations.
CONGESTION MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE (CMC)
The CMC advises on technical matters related to updating the MPO’s Congestion Management Process
(CMP) and coordinating the CMP with regional Congestion Management System and Intelligent
Transportation System architecture. Members are professional staff appointed by the division,
department or agency they represent and one representative each from the TAC and CAC.
LOCAL COORDINATING BOARD (LCB) FOR TRANSPORTATION DISADVANTAGED
The LCB assists the MPO in identifying local service needs, providing information and direction to the
Community Transportation Coordinator (Board of County Commissioners) on the coordination of services.
Members on the LCB are appointed by designated planning agencies. The designated official planning
agency for Collier County is the MPO.
ADVISER NETWORK
Collier MPO established the Adviser Network in 2018 to serve as an additional mechanism for citizen
involvement with the objective of increasing participation by local residents who may not have the time
to participate on a standing committee. The MPO gathers contact information from participants at MPO-
sponsored public meetings and special events who express an interest in remaining informed of MPO
activities and wish to comment on MPO actions of specific interest to them. Members of the Adviser
Network have several options for participating in the MPO planning process, varying from interaction
through social media, responding to surveys, submitting comments, and viewing of videos to attendance
at community forums. Members are encouraged to participate on an as-desired basis as time allows and
their interest dictates.
INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION
The MPO adopted a Government to Government Public Involvement Policy effecting tribal entities in
June 2016. The policy is incorporated in the PPP as Appendix A.
The MPO has an Interlocal Agreement with Lee County MPO to coordinate regional transportation
planning. The Interlocal Agreement is incorporated in the PPP as Appendix B.
9.E.2
Packet Pg. 963 Attachment: Amended PPP – Clean Version (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
12 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
PLANNING FACTORS
The Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act, signed into law in December 2015, continued the
performance-based planning and public involvement requirements of prior transportation acts. It is likely
that future transportation appropriation acts will do likewise. However, to the extent that Planning
Factors change in the future, this section of the PPP will be updated to reflect them.
The FAST Act identifies ten planning factors the MPO must consider when developing its LRTP.
1. Support the economic vitality of the metropolitan area, especially by enabling global
competitiveness, productivity, and efficiency.
2. Increase the safety of the transportation system for motorized and non-motorized users.
3. Increase the security of the transportation system for motorized and non-motorized users.
4. Increase the accessibility* and mobility* of people and for freight.
5. Protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, improve the quality of life
and promote consistency between transportation improvements and state and local planned
growth and economic development patterns.
6. Enhance the integration and connectivity* of the transportation system, across and between
modes, for people and freight.
7. Promote efficient system management and operation.
8. Improve the resiliency and reliability of the transportation system and reduce or mitigate
stormwater impacts of the transportation system.
9. Emphasize the preservation of the existing transportation system.
10. Enhance travel and tourism.
*the following definitions help explain the use of these words in transportation planning:
Accessibility – the ability to reach a desired destination
Mobility – physical movement from one place to another, relates to the availability of different modes or
options for travel
Connectivity – the integration of transportation modes throughout the system
9.E.2
Packet Pg. 964 Attachment: Amended PPP – Clean Version (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
13 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES
PRIMARY GOAL: TO ACTIVELY ENGAGE A BROAD CROSS-SECTION OF THE PUBLIC
IN TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AND SERVE AS A SOURCE OF INFORMATION ON
MPO TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ACTIVITIES
OBJECTIVES
1. Maintain an up-to-date master database of contacts
2. Develop an Adviser Network
3. Broaden public awareness of, and active engagement with, the MPO
4. Develop a presence on social media
5. Develop an interactive website, conduct on-line surveys and invite on-line commentary
6. Receive input from a diverse cross-section of the community
7. Demonstrate effectiveness of public input
PERFORMANCE MEASURES
1. Contact Database - updated quarterly at a minimum
2. Adviser Network – track numbers of Advisers listed and attendance at community forums on an
annual basis
3. Public Awareness/Engagement – conduct annual on-line surveys
4. Social Media –establish a program and report on beginning levels of activities after year one
5. Interactive Website – track opportunities and participation numbers annually
6. Diversity – track and report on participation by demographics, businesses, NGO, civic groups
7. Effectiveness – track and report on changes that can be directly linked to public comments
SECONDARY GOAL: TO COMPLY WITH STATE AND FEDERAL REGULATIONS
OBJECTIVES
1. Identify regulatory requirements in PPP
2. Develop PPP to meet requirements.
PERFORMANCE MEASURES
1. FDOT review and concurrence
2. FDOT review and concurrence
9.E.2
Packet Pg. 965 Attachment: Amended PPP – Clean Version (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
14 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
WHOM WE SEEK TO CONSULT WITH
Tribal entities Regional planning partners
Public Agencies Minority communities
Business groups Public health organizations
Civic organizations Neighborhood/Homeowner Associations
Freight industry representatives Private transportation providers
Low-income communities Environmental groups
Tourism industry representatives Bicyclists and pedestrians
Representatives of the disabled Higher education institutions
Social service organizations Transit dependent persons
Organizations focused on aging Organizations focused on youth
Community & economic development
organizations
Workforce development organizations/agencies
HAVING YOUR SAY
The Collier MPO encourages public comments and provides the public with a variety of ways to voice their
opinions and share their ideas.
EARLY COORDINATION
The Adviser Network will have an opportunity to submit early comments and provide direction on the
development of major work products such as the LRTP, PPP, UPWP and TIP. The Adviser Network will also
have an opportunity to provide public input on transportation planning issues and subject areas prior to
the MPO actually beginning work on developing a specific plan. Comments and suggestions will be used
to guide the development of work products that will eventually go before the advisory committees and
MPO Board.
PUBLIC COMMENT PERIODS & NOTIFICATIONS
The primary opportunity for the public to share their thoughts and ideas occurs during public review and
comment periods as major plans are developed through the MPO’s planning process and reviewed at
regularly scheduled advisory committee and Board meetings. The public will have at least 30 days to
review and comment as major plans make their way through the advisory committee process and
ultimately, go to the MPO Board for formal action such as approval or adoption. State statutes and
Federal law require the provision of adequate public notice of public participation activities, providing
timely notice and reasonable access to information about transportation issues, using visualization
techniques to describe the LRTP and TIP and making information and meeting notices available in
electronic format on the Internet. Rarely are public comment periods of specific duration specified by law
except for the following with regards to the PPP and LRTP:
PPP - Adopting or revising the MPO’s Public Participation Plan – 45 calendar days
9.E.2
Packet Pg. 966 Attachment: Amended PPP – Clean Version (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
15 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
LRTP - Posting the final adopted LRTP on the internet and having hard copies available at
the MPO office– no later than 90 days after adoption
HOW TO SUBMIT COMMENTS TO THE COLLIER MPO
• The MPO provides self-addressed stamped comment cards which may be mailed to the MPO
office. Call 239-252-5814 for more information.
• Comments may be submitted on the MPO website with electronic comment cards. Go to
www.colliermpo.com
• The public may comment at any MPO advisory committee or MPO Board meeting. The meeting
schedule is available on the MPO website Meeting Schedule or by calling 239-252-5814
HOW YOUR COMMENTS WILL BE USED
The Collier MPO values public input. All comments received will be considered as part of the
transportation decision-making process. Staff will document all comments and forward them to the MPO
advisory committees and Boards. All organizations and individuals who submit a comment in writing or
via email and include their contact information will receive a written response to their comment. Staff will
make every effort to respond to comments before a final vote by the MPO Board on an action item.
Comments received using the methods described above are documented as part of the public record and
are posted on line at www.colliermpo.com
Appendix F Standard Operating Procedures identifies how public comments will be documented.
GETTING INVOLVED
The current calendar of MPO and advisory committee meetings may be found online at
www.colliermpo.com or you may request a hard copy be mailed or faxed to you by calling 239-252-5814.
MPO BOARD MEETINGS
The MPO Board meets on the second Friday of the month (with the exception of July, August and January,
when there are no regularly scheduled meetings.) Board meetings are typically held in the Board of County
Commissioners Chambers, 3299 E. Tamiami Blvd. Naples, Administration Building (F), third floor. See Site
map for Collier County Government Center, following page. The Collier MPO traditionally holds its April
Board meeting in a different location, rotating between facilities provided by member entities.
Joint Lee County MPO/Collier MPO advisory committee and Board meetings rotate locations between Lee
County and Collier County. Additionally, special meetings are sometimes called on dates, times and
locations that vary from the norm. Staff advises checking the MPO website prior to a Board meeting to
confirm the location, date and time of a meeting you wish to attend. Please check the MPO calendar for
advisory committee meeting dates, times and locations as well.
9.E.2
Packet Pg. 967 Attachment: Amended PPP – Clean Version (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
16 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
9.E.2
Packet Pg. 968 Attachment: Amended PPP – Clean Version (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
17 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
ADVISER NETWORK PUBLIC FORUMS
In addition to providing notice via the MPO’s listserv(s), the MPO will send email notice to the Adviser
Network when hosting community meetings on plans and studies in process, to solicit public input on
issues of current interest. As part of the process, MPO staff or the MPO’s consultant will prepare a recap
of the meeting to document public comments and to share the comments and recommendations with
the advisory committees and MPO Board. See Appendix F – Standard Operating Procedures for more
detail.
APPOINTMENTS TO ADVISORY COMMITTEES
The Collier MPO Board appoints local residents to serve on two Advisory Committees – the Citizens
Advisory Committee (CAC) and the Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC). The MPO Bylaws
specify the makeup of each committee. The MPO Bylaws may be viewed on the MPO website at the
following link: MPO Board Bylaws
The bylaws of the CAC may be viewed at the following link(s): CAC Bylaws
BPAC Bylaws: BPAC Bylaws
If you are interested in serving on one of these two advisory committees, staff recommends first reviewing
the bylaws to determine your eligibility, then contacting the MPO Director at 239-252-5884 if you have
questions concerning eligibility or the time commitment entailed.
You may download an application to serve on an Advisory Committee at this link: Advisory Committee
Application
As an alternative, you may call the MPO office at 239-252-5814 and ask that an application form be sent
to your home address. Completed application forms must include your signature and may be scanned and
sent electronically to colliermpo@colliergov.net. If you prefer, you may mail in or hand deliver
applications to the MPO office at 2885 South Horseshoe Drive, Naples, FL 34104
HOW TO LEAVE COMMENTS ABOUT A SPECIFIC PLAN OR STUDY
The MPO website features the Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP), the Transportation Improvement
Program (TIP), the Unified Public Work Program (UPWP) and other plans currently underway.
Opportunities for the public to comment accompany each posted plan. Call the office if you have any
questions (239) 252-5814 or cannot find what you are looking for on the website: www.colliermpo.com
PUBLIC MEETING SCHEDULES
The meeting schedule is standardized but it is subject to change. Check the location by viewing the current
agenda on the MPO website or call the MPO office at 239-252-5814 to have one sent to you. Link to
agendas: MPO Meeting Agendas
9.E.2
Packet Pg. 969 Attachment: Amended PPP – Clean Version (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
18 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
ACCESS FOR ALL
LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY PLAN
The purpose of the Collier MPO’s Limited English Proficiency Plan is to provide meaningful access to the
MPO for people with limited or no ability to speak, read, write or understand English. The LEP Plan is
incorporated in the PPP as Appendix C.
NONDISCRIMINATION POLICY AND COMPLAINT PROCEDURE
Collier MPO places a high value on providing equal access to the transportation planning process. The
MPO’s Nondiscrimination Plan and Complaint Procedures are incorporated in the PPP as Appendix D.
IDENTIFYING UNDERSERVED POPULATIONS
Collier MPO maintains a GIS database and map that identifies traditionally underserved populations in the
region. MPO staff updates the database and map periodically, based on conducting annual reviews of
Census Bureau statistics. See Appendix E for the current version of the map and related statistics. The
following Outreach Strategies are intended to reach a broad cross-section of the region’s demographics,
including traditionally underserved populations.
OUTREACH STRATEGIES
The MPO is using the following outreach strategies to engage the public in the transportation
planning process. Appendix F – Standard Operating Procedures summarizes in graphic format
how these strategies will be deployed on specific plans and studies along with public notification
requirements for committee and Board meetings.
ENHANCED INTERACTIVE WEBSITE: www.colliermpo.com
The MPO has updated its website to introduce interactive features that will enhance its ability to serve as
a source of information. The site provides a calendar of events, links to agendas, minutes, and draft MPO
Un traductor del idioma español está disponible
en la oficina de MPO. Teléfono: 239-252-5814
Gen yon tradiktè Kreyòl Ayisyen ki disponib nan
biwo MPO la. Telefòn: 239-252-5884
9.E.2
Packet Pg. 970 Attachment: Amended PPP – Clean Version (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
19 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
documents currently under review. Opportunities for the public to comment are available in the form of
staff email and phone number listings. Interactive surveys and maps are frequently posted on the website
while major plans and studies are in process.
VISUALIZATION TECHNIQUES
The MPO is investing in enhanced visualization techniques such as videos, simulation models, animated
graphics and 3D imaging in the course of developing updates to the Long-Range Transportation Plan and
other major plans and studies that may be underway in any given year. For example, in 2018, staff posted
a video created for the Golden Gate Walkability Study. The video was produced by a drone, fly-over
camera view of people walking and crossing streets in the community. Information was added to generate
interest in participating in public meetings to develop the plan. The video was also shown on local public
access TV.
In addition, the MPO is continuing the use of a broad range of traditional visualization techniques such as
maps, pictures or graphics in order to assist with the communication of complex concepts and to promote
understanding of transportation plans and programs. A logo representing the MPO is used to identify
products and publications of the MPO. The logo helps the public to become familiar with the MPO and
recognize MPO products. The logo is used on all MPO publications.
E-NOTIFICATIONS AND SOCIAL MEDIA
The MPO began posting information on Collier County’s Facebook page in January 2018. Current MPO
postings may be viewed at the following link: https://www.facebook.com/CollierGov/
In addition, E-blasts are sent to members of the Adviser Network and other interested parties to provide
helpful information on transportation planning, public meetings, events and opportunities for
involvement. The MPO Master Database lists all contacts including businesses, residential associations,
agencies, Native American Tribes, the Adviser Network, and the public. The database includes committee
membership and e-mail addresses. Mailing addresses will be included for Individuals who do not have e-
mail and require hard copy documents, surveys, comment cards, etc. to be mailed to them.
9.E.2
Packet Pg. 971 Attachment: Amended PPP – Clean Version (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
20 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
SURVEYS & POLLS
The MPO conducts surveys and polls on specific topics and plans as needed to engage a broad cross
section of the public. The information will be shared on the MPO’s website.
PARTNERING
The MPO coordinates with government agencies to conduct outreach at health care centers, food banks
and food stamp offices, schools, offices on aging etc. and develop alliances with faith-based institutions,
cultural centers, community-based organizations; partnering with local interest groups to conduct
outreach at special events. Partners in outreach are encouraged to take a leadership role in public
participation efforts in the area. The purpose is to build relationships and identify strategies to bring
former nonparticipants into the planning process.
PUBLIC TELEVISION
Regular MPO Board meetings – those that take place at the Board of County Commissioners Chamber -
are shown on Collier TV, and can be watched live and on-line at the following link: Collier County TV
Collier County maintains an archive of MPO Board meetings on-line. The MPO is currently working with
Collier TV to also post video recordings and flyers produced by the MPO on Collier TV. Collier County
Meeting Video Archive
EARNED MEDIA
The MPO issues press releases and provide briefings in advance of special events and public meetings and
workshops oriented to plan development or gathering public comments on major issues. The intention is
to build relationships with local television, radio and print journalists and reporters to facilitate public
information campaigns. For example, during the development of the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan
in 2018, the Project Manager with the MPO was interviewed on Univision, with translation services
provided by the station for its Spanish speaking audience.
PROJECT SPECIFIC PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT PLANS (PIP)
The MPO typically develops project specific PIPs targeting stakeholders who are most likely to be
interested in the outcome of the plan or project in question. The public involvement strategies are geared
to the target audience and may vary by topic or subarea of the MPO.
A PIP developed for a specific project must meet or exceed the notification commitments in the Board-
adopted PPP.
9.E.2
Packet Pg. 972 Attachment: Amended PPP – Clean Version (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
21 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
MONTHLY eNEWSLETTER
MPO staff has traditionally produced a semi-annual newsletter distributed via email and hard copy to the
Master Database list of all contacts. The MPO has recently expanded that practice by publishing a monthly
newsletter in digital format. MPO staff will continue to bring hard copies for distribution at public
meetings and community outreach events held throughout the year. The newsletter promotes regular
and special meetings, planning studies, publications and work products. The newsletter will be translated
into Spanish or Haitian Creole upon request.
PUBLIC WORKSHOPS/OPEN-HOUSES
Public workshops are generally open and informal with project team members interacting with the public
on a one-on-one basis. Short presentations may be given at these meetings. Project-specific workshops
and meetings provide detailed project information to the public and solicit public involvement. They are
conducted for project-specific activities and the MPO’s federal certification review. (See PIP above and
Appendix F – Standard Operating Procedures for more detail.)
PUBLIC MEETINGS
All MPO Board and advisory committee meetings are open to the public at ADA accessible facilities in
convenient locations and used to solicit public comment. Members of the public are given an opportunity
to address the MPO board or committee on any agenda item or transportation related topic not on the
agenda. These meetings provide formal settings for citizens or interested parties to make comments to
the MPO and advisory committees. They are recorded, and minutes are taken for the record. The MPO
may also hold stand-alone public meetings related to specific projects or plans. These meetings can be
held at any time during a project. Notice of the meetings is given to the public through the MPO website,
e-mail, and if requested, by regular mail. The MPO issues press releases to notify the media of public
meetings, as recommended by the Government in the Sunshine Manual (2017).
COMMUNITY OUTREACH EVENTS
MPO staff participation in community outreach events at public venues, fairs and festivals provides
another method to inform the public about the Collier MPO and how individuals or groups can become
involved in the metropolitan transportation planning process. MPO surveys, newsletters, maps or
comment forms are often distributed to heighten the awareness of the public on functions of the MPO.
MPO staff will participate in activities hosted by other agencies and organizations and provide printed
materials at outreach events.
COMMENT FORMS
Comment forms are used to solicit public comment on specific issues being presented at workshops or
public meetings and community outreach events. Comment forms may be very general in nature, or very
specific for soliciting feedback. Comment forms are sometimes included in publications and on the MPO
website to solicit input.
9.E.2
Packet Pg. 973 Attachment: Amended PPP – Clean Version (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
22 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
QR CODES
The MPO inserts Quick Response (QR) Codes on the covers of adopted plans such as the Long
Range Transportation Plan, Public Participation Plan, Transportation Improvement Program,
Unified Planning Work Program and the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan. QR codes allow the
public immediate access to view MPO documents using cell phone applications.
ORIENTATIONS
MPO staff conduct individual orientations to inform new members of the MPO Board and
committees of their roles and the MPO transportation planning process.
EVALUATION
ANNUAL REPORTING ON PERFORMANCE MEASURES
Reporting on the PPP performance measures is included in the MPO Director’s Annual Report to the MPO
Board at the end of each fiscal year. If the analysis indicates a need for modifications to the PPP, the
Director will discuss options with the Board and follow-up with bringing the changes through the Advisory
Committee review process during the coming year.
REQUIRED NOTIFICATION
The MPO will review the PPP on an annual basis to ensure it remains consistent with the requirements in
the Florida Department of Transportation’s MPO Handbook. The MPO Handbook may be viewed in its
entirely at the following link: FDOT MPO Handbook
Current requirements are summarized by planning product as follows.
LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN
Florida Statutes 339.175 – requires the MPO to provide the following interested parties, at a minimum, a
reasonable opportunity to comment on the LRTP:
• Public
• Affected Public Agencies
• Representatives of Transportation Agencies
• Freight Transportation Service Providers and Shippers
• Private providers of Transportation
• Public Transit Representatives and Users
• 23 CFR 450.322 – All interested parties are to be given a reasonable opportunity to
comment on the LRTP.
9.E.2
Packet Pg. 974 Attachment: Amended PPP – Clean Version (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
23 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
Administrative Modifications are minor revisions to the LRTP and do not require public review
and comment or re-demonstrating fiscal constraint. 23 CFR 450.104
Amendments are major revisions to the LRTP and do require public involvement and re-
demonstrating fiscal constraint.
Major Updates are adopted every 5 years. The TAC and CAC are provided the opportunity to
review and comment on Amendments and Major Updates prior to the MPO Board taking action.
If the TAC and CAC achieve a quorum, the committees may vote to endorse the amendment or
update as presented, or vote to endorse subject to revision, or may vote not to endorse. Whatever
action an advisory committee takes is reported to the Board in the MPO staff Executive Summary.
See Appendix F – Standard Operating Procedures for public notification and public comment
period requirements.
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
Maintaining Concurrency with MPO Handbook - FDOT continually updates the MPO Handbook and
notifies the MPOs of any changes. These FDOT-generated updates may on occasion trigger the need to
update the PPP as well. When that occurs, the MPO will post notice containing the new PPP language on
its website and distribute copies to the MPO Advisory Committees and Board. Other routine updates,
such as identifying new MPO Board members and/or officers, new MPO contact information, new State
and Federal code citations, correcting typographical or grammatical errors or clarifications, will be
handled in the same manner
Amendments and Adopting a New PPP - Amendments and Major Updates will be previewed by the MPO
TAC and CAC before being acted upon by the Board.
Federal law requires a minimum 45-day public comment period prior to amending or adopting
a PPP. The public comment period begins with posting the CAC and TAC meeting agendas,
posting notification on the MPO website, and emailing the Adviser Network. Final Board action
may be scheduled to occur after the 45-day public comment period has ended.
TRANSPORTATION DISADVANTAGED SERVICE PLAN (TDSP)
Purpose – A TDSP addresses the services provided to meet the public transportation and mobility needs
of the elderly and persons with disabilities. The plan discusses the types of paratransit services available
to citizens of the county. Examples include: ADA paratransit service and Transportation Disadvantaged
Program (TD) services which are part of a coordinated human services requirement of all three core FTA
grant programs as reauthorized under the FAST Act for the Urbanized Area Formula Funding program, 49
U.S.C. 5307, 5310 and 5311.
Statutory Requirements – Florida Statutes (F.S.) 427. Each county or each MPO is required to develop a
TDSP with updates every five years. The Florida Commission for the Transportation Disadvantaged (FCTD)
oversees the implementation of the TDSP. The Community Transportation Coordinator (CTC) and the
Local Coordinating Board (LCB) will use the TDSP as a guide for maintaining and improving transportation
9.E.2
Packet Pg. 975 Attachment: Amended PPP – Clean Version (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
24 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
services. It is the requirement of the MPO to provide an annual performance evaluation of the CTC. The
MPO is also required to provide annual minor updates to the TDSP and a major update every five years.
Florida Commission for the Transportation Disadvantaged
The Florida Commission for the Transportation Disadvantaged has issued two regulatory documents –
“Local Coordinating Board and Planning Agency Operating Guidelines (2014)” and an “Instruction Manual
for the Memorandum of Agreement and the TDSP – 2007/2008” that remain in effect today. The
documents may be viewed on the Commission’s website at: TD Commission
The Commission stipulates that Major Updates to the TDSP be announced by way of an “advertisement”
published in the local newspaper with the greatest circulation. This requirement is carried out by the MPO.
Major Update - adopted every 5 years
Public Comment Period
30-day public comment period required
Legal ad required – place in Naples Daily News
• Additional public notice of public comment period provided by posting on the MPO website,
emailing the Adviser Network and any other stakeholders the MPO and LCB have identified
• Distribute flyers on transit vehicles to notify riders of comment period and adoption meeting
• Distribute copies of the Major TDSP Update and/or QRC on comment forms to local government
agency offices and libraries
• Post Major TDSP Update and comment forms on the MPO website
• Distribute copies of the Major TDSP Update to the LCB members
Response to Comments
• MPO staff will respond in writing to public input received during the comment period
• When significant written and oral comments are received, a summary, analysis or report will be
included in the plan. The term, “significant” is used in State statutes and Federal law governing
public involvement but remains undefined. The MPO’s working definition of “significant” is any
comment that could potentially result in a change to the scope of a document, existing conditions
analysis, issue definition, recommended projects, policies.
Adoption
• The LCB will meet at the end of the public comment period and allow time for public comment at
the meeting prior to adoption of the TDSP
• The LCB will consider the comments received during the public comment period before adopting
the TDSP by Roll Call Vote
• The MPO Board will ratify the Major TDSP Update after adoption by the LCB. Ratification may be
placed on the MPO Board Consent Agenda
9.E.2
Packet Pg. 976 Attachment: Amended PPP – Clean Version (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
25 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
Minor Update – adopted annually except in Major Update adoption years
The difference between the public involvement requirements of a Major and Minor Update is
the required public comment period is shortened to 14 days and no distribution of flyers &
comment forms on transit vehicles and CAT transfer Stations is required.
TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Administrative Modifications are minor revisions to the TIP and do not require public review and
comment, or re-demonstrations of fiscal constraint. Administration Modifications will be distributed as
informational items in MPO Board and advisory committee meeting packets, in addition to being posted
on the MPO website’s TIP page.
Amendments are major revisions to the TIP and do require public review and comment along with re-
demonstration of financial constraint. The TAC and CAC are provided the opportunity to review and
comment on amendments and the annual adoption of a new 5-year TIP based on the FDOT Work Program
prior to the Board taking action. If they achieve a quorum, the TAC and CAC may vote to endorse the
amendment as presented or vote to endorse subject to revision or may vote not to endorse. Whatever
action an advisory committee takes is reported to the Board in the MPO staff Executive Summary. The
MPO will follow the notification procedures outlined herein for MPO Board and Advisory Committee
meetings See Appendix F – Standard Operating Procedures for public notification and public comment
period requirements.
UNIFIED PLANNING WORK PROGRAM
The two-year UPWP is adopted every other year. As with Amendments, the MPO adoption process
requires that the two-year UPWP be previewed and commented upon by the MPO TAC and CAC, at a
minimum, before being acted upon by the Board.
Modifications as defined by the FDOT MPO Handbook, do not require MPO Board or FDOT approval and
do not require public involvement. Modifications will be posted on the MPO website on the UPWP page
and distributed to FDOT, the MPO Board and Advisory Committees as informational items in agenda
packets.
Amendments as defined by the FDOT MPO Handbook, do require MPO Board approval. The TAC and CAC
are provided the opportunity to review and comment on amendments prior to the Board taking action. If
the committees achieve a quorum, they may vote to endorse the amendment as presented, or vote to
endorse subject to revision, or vote not to endorse. Whatever action an advisory committee takes is
reported to the Board in the MPO staff Executive Summary. The MPO will follow the notification
procedures outlined herein for MPO Board and Advisory Committee meetings. See Appendix F – Standard
Operating Procedures for public notification and public comment period requirements.
9.E.2
Packet Pg. 977 Attachment: Amended PPP – Clean Version (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
26 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
MPO BOARD MEETINGS AND WORKSHOPS
The MPO commits to maintaining the following longstanding notification standard:
• Posting agenda and meeting packet seven days in advance on the MPO website
• Email distribution of agenda and packet to MPO Board members and delivering hard copies to
members who have requested them, seven days in advance of the meeting
• Email distribution of agenda and packet to Advisor Network and to other interested parties on
the MPO’s email contact list
• Working with Collier County Communications Division to Issue a press release a minimum of 48
hours prior to the meeting
MPO ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETINGS
The MPO commits to maintaining the following longstanding notification standard:
• Posting agenda and meeting packet seven days in advance on the MPO website
• Email distribution of agenda and packet to committee members along with hard copies delivered
to members who have requested them, seven days in advance of the meeting
• Email distribution of agenda and packet to Adviser Network and to other interested parties on
the MPO’s email contact list
• Working with Collier County Communications Division to Issue a press release a minimum of 48
hours prior to the meeting
OTHER PUBLIC MEETINGS AND WORKSHOPS
The MPO may wish to schedule other public meetings and workshops in the course of developing a wide
variety of planning documents, researching specific issues, conducting surveys and public education
campaigns. The MPO commits to maintaining the longstanding notification standard of:
• Posting notices of public meetings a minimum seven days in advance on the MPO website,
• Posting agenda and meeting packet, to the extent materials are available, on MPO website
• Email distribution of agenda and packet to Advisor Network and to other interested parties on
the MPO’s contact list
• Issuing press release to major local newspapers, television and radio stations
• Emailing MPO Advisory Committee members notice of meetings on topics of interest to the
Committee members as appropriate
• Working with Collier County Communications Division to Issue a press release a minimum of 48
hours prior to the meeting
9.E.2
Packet Pg. 978 Attachment: Amended PPP – Clean Version (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
27 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
EXCEPTIONS TO NOTIFICATION COMMITMENTS
There are occasions when the MPO is required to act quickly in order to meet a grant deadline, preserve
spending authority or respond to an unforeseen opportunity or emergency. Unforeseen opportunities are
most likely to occur in response to a request by FDOT due to the severe time constraints the agency
operates under. Emergency situations include manmade and natural disasters such as hurricanes, floods,
epidemics and pandemics, chemical spills, acts of terrorism, cyber-attacks, etc.
In a nonemergency situation when an unforeseen opportunity demands immediate Board action, staff
may bring proposed actions forward to the MPO Board that the TAC and CAC have not had the opportunity
to preview and comment on. This allows the Board to be fully informed of the situation and to take action
if it wishes to do so, or to decline to take immediate action and remand the item to one or more Advisory
Committee for further study.
EMERGENCY PROVISIONS FOR PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT
Public engagement is very important to the MPO, FDOT, FHWA and FTA. In an effort to protect public
health and to comply with instructions, recommendations and Executive Orders issued during a pandemic
or other threat to community health, the MPO will be proactive but flexible in meeting public participation
plan requirements. MPOs are expected to continue to provide opportunities for public involvement
throughout their planning activities. However, some public participation plan activities may be delayed
or deferred and be replaced with other engagement strategies to ensure that all sectors of the population
have an opportunity to participate. The MPO will document any outreach activities that were originally
documented in the PPP or in a PIP for a specific project that require modifications and provide strategies,
if needed, to ensure sufficient and appropriate outreach is maintained.
Immediate/Short Term Response
In the event of a manmade or natural emergency that precludes holding regular public meetings, the MPO
Board may provide staff direction on how to proceed by way of passing a motion. The motion may include
authorizing the MPO Chair to act on behalf of the Board and empower the MPO Director to bring issues
requiring immediate attention forward to the MPO Chair to act upon. The MPO Board will have the
opportunity to ratify all emergency actions taken at a later date.
Intermediate Response
Once the scope of an emergency becomes better defined, the US President, Congress, Governor of the
State of Florida or Local Governing Boards and Councils may issue declarations of emergency and
Executive Orders that MPOs must follow. In the event of a declaration of manmade or natural emergency
that precludes holding regular public meetings for a known or unknown period of time, the MPO Board
will adopt a resolution to:
1. Recognize the emergency situation calling for alternative public involvement strategies
2. Stipulate that the emergency procedures for public involvement are temporary
9.E.2
Packet Pg. 979 Attachment: Amended PPP – Clean Version (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
28 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
3. Specify the alternative public involvement strategies to be used, including time periods for public
comment and MPO responses to the comments
4. Ensure that public involvement strategies are inclusive as possible to the extent that they comply
with emergency executive orders to protect public health, etc;
5. if public involvement strategies are not sufficiently inclusive due to public health concern or other
limitations, the MPO may consider holding additional public involvement activities on the plans
after adoption, and after the emergency is over, to ensure that the public is informed and has the
ability to request reconsiderations/amendments to the MPO Board
6. Acknowledge that the resolution is provided as an interim measure and may be modified as new
local, state or national technical assistance and/or guidance is issued
Public involvement strategies include but are not limited to virtual meetings, on-line surveys, telephone
conferencing, social media and interactive components of the MPO website. It is desirable, and may be
feasible, to maintain the public participation plan’s standard methodologies and timeframes for reporting
and responding to public comments. However, if the time frame must be shortened or the methodologies
are curtailed due to the nature of the emergency, the MPO may take whatever steps are necessary to
meet deadlines. In the event of a public health emergency coinciding with a cyber-attack, public
involvement activities may have to be suspended for a period of time.
Long Term Response
In the event that an emergency situation persists for several months or more and in the absence of action
taken by the federal government to extend the deadlines for delivery of core MPO planning products such
as the LRTP, UPWP, TIP and PPP; the MPO may take whatever action is necessary to meet the federal
deadlines.
After the emergency is over, the MPO will resume its regular meeting schedule and public involvement
activities with the highest priority given to meeting immediate deadlines and the next level of priority
given to providing opportunities for the public to review, comment on and request amendments to any
plans that were adopted during the emergency.
Continuity of Operations Plans
The MPO is required to maintain a Continuity of Operations Plan (COOP) that outlines the course of action
to be taken during an emergency. MPO staff participate in Collier County’s annual updates to its COOP to
facilitate concurrent implementation of both plans during an emergency.
9.E.2
Packet Pg. 980 Attachment: Amended PPP – Clean Version (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
29 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
FEDERAL COMPLIANCE
AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT
The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), signed into law in 1990, is a landmark civil rights legislation
ensuring equal opportunity for people with disabilities to access employment, public facilities,
transportation, state and local government services and communications. The ADA requires coordinating
with disabled community representatives in the development and improvement of transportation
services. Persons with disabilities must also be able to access the sites where public involvement activities
occur as well as the information presented. See www.ada.gov for more information.
TITLE VI OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964
Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination based upon race, color or national origin.
Specifically, 42 USC § 2000d states, “No person in the United States shall, on the grounds of race, color or
national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to
discrimination under any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.” See Title VI Civil Rights
Act US Dept of Justice for more information.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 12898 – ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE
Executive Order (EO) 12898; Federal Actions to Address Environmental justice in Minority and Low-
Income Populations. The EO reinforced the requirements of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and
focused federal attention on the environmental and human health conditions in minority and low-income
communities. Furthermore, recent guidance issued by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and
the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) emphasizes the importance of considering and addressing
Environmental Justice (EJ) in all phases of the transportation planning process. EJ calls for the fair
treatment and meaningful involvement of all people regardless of race, color, national origin or income,
and that the benefits, as well as the impacts, of transportation investments are fairly distributed.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 13166 – LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
People with Limited English Proficiency (LEP) are those with a primary or home language other than
English. EO 13166 requires any agency that receives federal funds to make their activities accessible to
non-English speaking individuals. See Limited English Proficiency Executive Order for more information.
REQUIREMENT FOR PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
The following material is excerpted from the electronic Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Chapter 23
HIGHWAYS.
“eCFR Ch 23 HIGHWAYS
§450.316 Interested parties, participation, and consultation.
9.E.2
Packet Pg. 981 Attachment: Amended PPP – Clean Version (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
30 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
(a) The MPO shall develop and use a documented participation plan that defines a process for
providing individuals, affected public agencies, representatives of public transportation employees,
public ports, freight shippers, providers of freight transportation services, private providers of
transportation (including intercity bus operators, employer-based commuting programs, such as
carpool program, vanpool program, transit benefit program, parking cash-out program, shuttle
program, or telework program), representatives of users of public transportation, representatives of
users of pedestrian walkways and bicycle transportation facilities, representatives of the disabled, and
other interested parties with reasonable opportunities to be involved in the metropolitan transportation
planning process.
(1) The MPO shall develop the participation plan in consultation with all interested parties and
shall, at a minimum, describe explicit procedures, strategies, and desired outcomes for:
(i) Providing adequate public notice of public participation activities and time for public review
and comment at key decision points, including a reasonable opportunity to comment on the proposed
metropolitan transportation plan and the TIP;
(ii) Providing timely notice and reasonable access to information about transportation issues and
processes;
(iii) Employing visualization techniques to describe metropolitan transportation plans and TIPs;
(iv) Making public information (technical information and meeting notices) available in
electronically accessible formats and means, such as the World Wide Web;
(v) Holding any public meetings at convenient and accessible locations and times;
(vi) Demonstrating explicit consideration and response to public input received during the
development of the metropolitan transportation plan and the TIP;
(vii) Seeking out and considering the needs of those traditionally underserved by existing
transportation systems, such as low-income and minority households, who may face challenges
accessing employment and other services;
(viii) Providing an additional opportunity for public comment, if the final metropolitan
transportation plan or TIP differs significantly from the version that was made available for public
comment by the MPO and raises new material issues that interested parties could not reasonably
have foreseen from the public involvement efforts;
(ix) Coordinating with the statewide transportation planning public involvement and consultation
processes under subpart B of this part; and
(x) Periodically reviewing the effectiveness of the procedures and strategies contained in the
participation plan to ensure a full and open participation process.
(2) When significant written and oral comments are received on the draft metropolitan
transportation plan and TIP (including the financial plans) as a result of the participation process in
this section or the interagency consultation process required under the EPA transportation conformity
regulations (40 CFR part 93, subpart A), a summary, analysis, and report on the disposition of
comments shall be made as part of the final metropolitan transportation plan and TIP.
9.E.2
Packet Pg. 982 Attachment: Amended PPP – Clean Version (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
31 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
(3) A minimum public comment period of 45 calendar days shall be provided before the initial or
revised participation plan is adopted by the MPO. Copies of the approved participation plan shall be
provided to the FHWA and the FTA for informational purposes and shall be posted on the World Wide
Web, to the maximum extent practicable.
(b) In developing metropolitan transportation plans and TIPs, the MPO should consult with
agencies and officials responsible for other planning activities within the MPA that are affected by
transportation (including State and local planned growth, economic development, tourism, natural
disaster risk reduction, environmental protection, airport operations, or freight movements) or
coordinate its planning process (to the maximum extent practicable) with such planning activities. In
addition, the MPO shall develop the metropolitan transportation plans and TIPs with due consideration
of other related planning activities within the metropolitan area, and the process shall provide for the
design and delivery of transportation services within the area that are provided by:
(1) Recipients of assistance under title 49 U.S.C. Chapter 53;
(2) Governmental agencies and non-profit organizations (including representatives of the
agencies and organizations) that receive Federal assistance from a source other than the U.S.
Department of Transportation to provide non-emergency transportation services; and
(3) Recipients of assistance under 23 U.S.C. 201-204.
(c) When the MPA includes Indian Tribal lands, the MPO shall appropriately involve the Indian
Tribal government(s) in the development of the metropolitan transportation plan and the TIP.
(d) When the MPA includes Federal public lands, the MPO shall appropriately involve the Federal
land management agencies in the development of the metropolitan transportation plan and the TIP.
(e) MPOs shall, to the extent practicable, develop a documented process(es) that outlines roles,
responsibilities, and key decision points for consulting with other governments and agencies, as
defined in paragraphs (b), (c), and (d) of this section, which may be included in the agreement(s)
developed under §450.314.
[81 FR 34135, May 27, 2016, as amended at 81 FR 93473, Dec. 20, 2016; 82 FR 56544, Nov. 29, 2017]”
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN AND STATE STATUTES
The following is excerpted from Florida State Statutes, available at the following link:
www.flsenate.gov/Laws/Statutes/2012/339.175
“339.175 METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATIONS
(7) 2.(e) LONG-RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN In the development of its long-range transportation
plan, each M.P.O. must provide the public, affected public agencies, representatives of transportation
agency employees, freight shippers, providers of freight transportation services, private providers of
transportation, representatives of users of public transit, and other interested parties with a reasonable
opportunity to comment on the long-range transportation plan. The long-range transportation plan
must be approved by the M.P.O.
9.E.2
Packet Pg. 983 Attachment: Amended PPP – Clean Version (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
32 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
6/(e)1. Each M.P.O. shall appoint a citizens’ advisory committee, the members of which serve at the
pleasure of the M.P.O. The membership on the citizens’ advisory committee must reflect a broad cross-
section of local residents with an interest in the development of an efficient, safe, and cost-effective
transportation system. Minorities, the elderly, and the handicapped must be adequately represented.
(8) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM. Each M.P.O. shall, in cooperation with the state and
affected public transportation operators, develop a transportation improvement program for the area
within the jurisdiction of the M.P.O. In the development of the transportation improvement program,
each M.P.O. must provide the public, affected public agencies, representatives of transportation agency
employees, freight shippers, providers of freight transportation services, private providers of
transportation, representatives of users of public transit, and other interested parties with a reasonable
opportunity to comment on the proposed transportation improvement program.”
SUNSHINE LAW §286.011 F.S.
Source: “Government in the Sunshine” PPT by Office of the County Attorney, Jeffrey A. Klatzkow
Establishes a basic right of access to most meetings of boards, commissions and other governing bodies
of state and local government agencies or authorities
• Meetings of public boards, commissions or committees (“boards”) must be open to the public.
• Reasonable notice of such meetings must be given.
• Minutes of the meeting must be taken.
The public must be allowed to attend meetings; however, there is no obligation to allow the public to
participate. The location:
• Must be accessible
• Sufficient size for turnout
• Facility cannot discriminate based on age, race, etc.
• Public access not unreasonably restricted
• Be within Collier County with few exceptions
Minutes of the meeting are required. Written minutes must be taken and made available promptly.
• Sound recordings may also be used, but only in addition to written minutes
• Minutes may be a brief summary of meeting’s events
• Minutes are public records
• Minutes must record the votes.
Reasonable Notice, according to the “Government In The Sunshine Manual” (2017) Section 4a.
“The Sunshine Law does not define the term “reasonable notice.” Therefore, the type of notice is
variable and depends upon the facts of the situation and the board involved. In each case, an agency
must give notice at such time and in such a manner as to enable the media and the general public to
attend the meeting.”
9.E.2
Packet Pg. 984 Attachment: Amended PPP – Clean Version (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
33 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
The Attorney General’s office cannot specify the type of notice which must be given in all cases, the
following notice guidelines are suggested:
1. Notice should contain time and place of meeting and an agenda if available, or a statement of the
general subject matter to be considered.
2. Notice should be prominently displayed in the area in the agency’s offices set aside for that purpose
and on the agency’s website.
3. Notice should be provided at least 7 days prior to meeting, except in the case of emergency or special
meetings. Emergency meetings should provide the most effective and appropriate notice feasible under
the circumstances.
4. Special meetings should have no less than 24 and preferably at least 72 hours reasonable notice to
the public.
5. Use of press releases, faxes, e-mails and/or phone calls to the local news media is highly effective in
providing notice of upcoming meetings.
The Sunshine Law does not mandate that an agency use a paid advertisement to provide public notice of
a meeting.
9.E.2
Packet Pg. 985 Attachment: Amended PPP – Clean Version (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
34 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
FDOT MPO HANDBOOK - COMPLIANCE
CHAPTER SIX PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT
Chapter Six of the FDOT MPO Handbook identifies Federal and State public involvement requirements for
Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPO) in Florida. The primary public involvement document that
MPOs must develop and maintain is a Public Participation Plan (PPP) that defines a process for providing
interested parties reasonable opportunities to review and comment on MPO work products. In addition,
MPOs must make Long Range Transportation Plans (LRTP) and Transportation Improvement Plans (TIP)
readily available for public review.
The MPO is required to develop the participation plan in consultation with all interested parties and must,
at a minimum, describe explicit procedures, strategies, and desired outcomes for: [23 C.F.R. 450.316(a)(1)]
1. Providing adequate public notice of public participation activities and time for public review and
comment at key decision points, including a reasonable opportunity to comment on the proposed LRTP
and the TIP;
2. Providing timely notice and reasonable access to information about transportation issues and
processes;
3. Employing visualization techniques to describe LRTPs and TIPs;
4. Making public information (technical information and meeting notices) available in electronically
accessible formats and means, such as the Internet;
5. Holding any public meetings at convenient and accessible locations and times;
6. Demonstrating explicit consideration and response to public input received during the development
of the LRTP and the TIP;
7. Seeking out and considering the needs of those traditionally underserved by existing transportation
systems, such as low-income and minority households, who may face challenges accessing employment
and other services;
8. Providing an additional opportunity for public comment, if the final LRTP or TIP differs significantly
from the version that was made available for public comment by the MPO and raises new material
issues that interested parties could not reasonably have foreseen from the public involvement efforts;
9. Coordinating with the statewide transportation planning public involvement and consultation
processes; and
10. Periodically reviewing the effectiveness of the public involvement procedures and strategies
contained in the PPP to ensure a full and open participation process.
9.E.2
Packet Pg. 986 Attachment: Amended PPP – Clean Version (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
35 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
When developing the PPP, it is important to allow enough time to receive and respond to public input to
find a balance between addressing appropriate public comments and adopting the LRTP within the
required timeframe, including any meetings or hearings that take place during that time.
A minimum public comment period of 45 calendar days must be provided before the initial or revised
participation plan is adopted by the MPO. Copies of the approved PPP must be provided to the Federal
Highway Administration (FHWA) and the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) for informational purposes;
and must be posted on the Internet to the maximum extent practicable. [23 C.F.R. 450.316(a)(3)]
LRTP AND TIP
When “significant” written and oral comments are received on the draft LRTP and TIP (including the
financial plans) as a result of the participation process in this section or the interagency consultation
process required under the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) transportation conformity
regulations (40 C.F.R. Part 93, Subpart A), a summary, analysis, and report on the disposition of
comments are required to be included in the final LRTP and TIP. [23 C.F.R. 450.316(a)(2)]
When the MPO area includes Indian Tribal lands, the MPO must appropriately involve the Indian Tribal
government(s) in the development of the LRTP and the TIP. [23 C.F.R. 450.316(c)]
The MPO may develop a PPP specific to the LRTP as part of the scope of that project. If this is done, the
PPP for the LRTP must be consistent with the overall PPP of the MPO.
Federal Strategies for Implementing Requirements for LRTP Update for the Florida MPOs, U. S.
Department of Transportation, November 2012. This additional guidance states that for LRTPs, MPO
Boards, their advisory committees, and the public, should have the opportunity to periodically review the
LRTP products, interim tasks, and reports that result in the final LRTP documentation. Furthermore, this
guidance also states that final adopted LRTP documentation should be posted to the Internet, and
available at the MPO offices, no later than 90 days after adoption.
The term, “significant” is used in State statutes and
Federal law but remains undefined.
THE COLLIER MPO DEFINES “SIGNIFICANT” AS ANY
COMMENT THAT COULD POTENTIALLY RESULT IN A
CHANGE TO THE SCOPE OF A PROJECT OR STUDY, TO
REPORTING ON EXISTING CONDITIONS THAT LEADS
TO DEFINING ISSUES AND RECOMMENDING
SOLUTIONS IN TERMS OF PROJECTS OR POLICIES.
9.E.2
Packet Pg. 987 Attachment: Amended PPP – Clean Version (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
36 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
Specific to the TIP, Federal requirements are that the MPO must provide all interested parties with a
reasonable opportunity to comment on the proposed TIP, as required by the PPP. In addition, the MPO
must publish or otherwise make readily available the TIP for public review, including (to the maximum
extent practicable) in electronically accessible formats and means, such as the Internet, as described in
the PPP. [23 C.F.R. 450.326(b)], [23 U.S.C. 134 (i)(6) and (7)]
In the event an MPO revises its TIP, the MPO must always use public participation procedures consistent
with the MPO’s PPP. However, public participation is not required for administrative modifications
unless specifically addressed in the PPP. [23 C.F.R. 450.328(a)]
ANNUAL LIST OF PRIORITIZED PROJECTS
Each MPO annually must prepare a list of project priorities and submit the list to the appropriate FDOT
District by October 1 of each year. The list must have been reviewed by the technical and citizens’
advisory committees and approved by the MPO before submission to the District. The annual list of
project priorities must be based upon project selection criteria that consider, among other items, the
MPO’s public involvement procedures. [s.339.175(8)(b)(5), F.S.]
PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT AND MPO COMMITTEES
Most MPOs consider their standing committees to be a fundamental part of their public involvement
activities. The formation of a technical advisory committee (TAC) and citizens’ advisory committee (CAC)
are required pursuant to s.339.175(6)(d), F.S. and s.339.175(6)(e), F.S.; and formation guidance is
provided in Chapter 2 of the MPO Handbook.
As an alternative to the use of a CAC, Florida Statute provides provisions for MPOs to adopt an alternate
program or mechanism that ensures adequate citizen involvement in the transportation planning
process following approval by FHWA, FTA, and FDOT. MPOs may also consider additional standing
committees as a public involvement activity to address specific needs, such as bicyclists, pedestrians, and
multiuse trails, safety, goods/freight movement, etc. MPOs must address and include their committee
activities in the PPP; and are encouraged to detail how the schedule for meetings, agenda packages, and
actions of the committees will be communicated with the public and how the public can participate in
those meetings.
MOST METROPOLITAN PLANNING
ORGANIZATIONS CONSIDER THEIR STANDING
COMMITTEES TO BE A FUNDAMENTAL PART OF
THEIR PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT ACTIVITIES.
9.E.2
Packet Pg. 988 Attachment: Amended PPP – Clean Version (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
37 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
SUNSHINE LAW
MPOs must provide reasonable notice of meetings and make adequate accommodations to hold open
meetings and provide an opportunity for public input. Minutes of meetings must be available for public
inspections. MPOs are prohibited from holding public meetings at a facility or location that
discriminates on the basis of sex, age, race, creed, color, origin, or economic status; or that otherwise
restrict public access. The statute establishes penalties for violations of these provisions and exceptions
for specific situations. MPOs should consult legal counsel for any questions regarding Florida’s
Government-in-the-Sunshine Law. The notification commitments identified herein comply with the State
Attorney General’s Office publication, “Government In The Sunshine Manual” (2017) Section 4a.
9.E.2
Packet Pg. 989 Attachment: Amended PPP – Clean Version (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
38 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
ACRONYMS
ADA Americans with Disabilities Act
BPAC Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
EJ Environmental Justice
EO Executive Order
FAST Act Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act
FDOT Florida Department of Transportation
FHWA Federal Highway Administration
FTA Federal Transit Administration
LCB Local Coordinating Board
LEP Limited English Proficiency
LRTP Long Range Transportation Plan
MPO Metropolitan Planning Organization (interchangeable with TPO)
PIP Public Involvement Plan (for individual projects)
PPP Public Participation Plan (adopted by the MPO)
TDP Transit Development Plan
TDSP Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan
TIP Transportation Improvement Program
TPO Transportation Planning Organization (interchangeable with MPO)
UPWP Unified Planning Work Program
USC United States Code
9.E.2
Packet Pg. 990 Attachment: Amended PPP – Clean Version (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
39 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
APPENDICES
A. GOVERNMENT TO GOVERNMENT PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT POLICY
B. LEE COUNTY MPO/COLLIER MPO INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT
C. LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY PLAN
D. NONDISCRIMINATION POLICY AND COMPLAINT PROCEDURE
E. TRADITIONALLY UNDERSERVED COMMUNITIES
F. STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES
9.E.2
Packet Pg. 991 Attachment: Amended PPP – Clean Version (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
40 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
APPENDIX A: COLLIER MPO’S GOVERNMENT TO GOVERNMENT
PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT POLICY EFFECTING TRIBAL ENTITIES
9.E.2
Packet Pg. 992 Attachment: Amended PPP – Clean Version (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
41 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
GOVERNMENT TO GOVERNMENT PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT POLICY Adopted June 9, 2017
I. Purpose: To promote Tribal involvement in the MPO planning process; initiate and maintain a positive
working relationship between the MPO and Tribal governments; promote effective collaboration
and communication between the MPO and Tribes;
II. Goals of Tribal Consultation:
• To create durable relationships between the Tribes and the MPO based on a mutual respect that
promotes coordinated transportation partnerships in service to all of our citizens.
• For the MPO to take a proactive approach to consultation by ensuring Tribal participation in MPO
planning processes that may affect Tribal governments, Tribal programs and Tribal citizens.
III. Consultation Requirements
Federal Transportation Planning Requirements
23 USC § 135(f)(2)c applies to FDOT, as follows: “With respect to each area of the State under the
jurisdiction of an Indian Tribal government, the statewide transportation plan shall be developed in
consultation with the Tribal government.”
23 CFR § 450.316(c), Interested parties, participation and consultation, applies to MPOs where an
MPO includes Indian Tribal lands and provides:
• “When the MPO includes Indian Tribal lands, the MPO(s) shall appropriately involve the Indian
Tribal government(s) in the development of the metropolitan transportation plan and the TIP.”
23 CFR § 450.316(e), Interested parties, participation and consultation, provides:
• “MPOs shall, to the extent practicable, develop a documented process(es) that outlines roles,
responsibilities, and key decision points for consulting with other governments and agencies, as
defined in paragraphs (b), (c), and (d) of this section, which may be included in the agreement(s)
developed under § 450.314.”
In addition to the above-referenced consultation requirements, if a Tribe wishes to access federal
transportation funds available to MPOs, the Tribe must do so through the MPO processes as provided
by law.
IV. Definitions
Collaboration: – Indicates a process in which two or more parties work together to achieve a common
set of goals. Collaboration is the timely communication and joint effort that lays the groundwork
for mutually beneficial relationships, including identifying issues and problems, identifying solutions
and providing follow-up as needed.
Communication: - Refers to verbal, electronic or written exchange of information between the MPO
and the Tribe. Generally, posting information on a website or in the newspaper does not constitute
consultation. Written correspondence, whether electronic or letter/postal format, should generally
be sent to the Tribe Chair with a copy to staff, requesting review and comment on specific plans or
9.E.2
Packet Pg. 993 Attachment: Amended PPP – Clean Version (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
42 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
projects that will affect a Tribe. While Tribal review may occur concurrently with public review,
Tribes are not considered the “public” for purposes of such communication.
Consultation – Means that one or more parties confer with other identified parties in accordance with
an established process and, prior to taking action(s), considers the views of the other parties and
periodically informs them about action(s) taken.” (See 23 CFR Part 450 Planning Assistance and
Standards, subpart A §450.104).
Government-to-Government Relations: Refers to an intergovernmental relationship between a
federally-recognized Tribe and the MPO Board during which consultation, meetings, and
communications occur between top-level officials of the MPO and the Tribe.
Tribal Sovereignty: Refers to a unique, political relationship between American Indians and the United
States government that recognizes that Tribes are sovereign nations with recognized powers of self-
government.
V. Tribal Entities
The two Federally-recognized Tribes with land holdings within or abutting Collier County are:
• The Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida, represented by the Business Council,
consisting of Chairman, Assistant Chairman, Treasurer, Secretary, and Lawmaker
Mailing address:
PO Box 440021
Tamiami Station
Miami, Fl 33144
(o) 305-223-8380
• The Seminole Tribe of Florida, represented by the Tribal Council comprised of Chairman, Vice
Chairman, Big Cypress Councilman, Brighton Councilman, and Hollywood Councilman
Mailing address:
Attn: Chairman and General Counsel
6300 Stirling Rd
Hollywood, FL 33024
(o) 239-354-5220 x 11402
VI. Core Principles
1. The MPO wishes to establish a Government-to-Government relationship and communication
protocol in recognition of the principle of Tribal sovereignty.
2. The MPO recognizes that good faith, mutual respect, and trust are fundamental to meaningful
collaboration and communication between governmental entities.
9.E.2
Packet Pg. 994 Attachment: Amended PPP – Clean Version (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
43 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
3. Formal communication and consultation will take place between the MPO Chair or Vice Chair
and the Tribal Chair or Assistant/Vice Chair. Written notification in the form of an email or
letter requesting consultation may be initiated by either the Tribal government or the MPO
and should include the following information:
• Identify the proposed action, program or project requiring consultation; and
• Identify the personnel authorized to consult on behalf of the MPO and the Tribe.
4. Informal Communications may occur between MPO and designated Tribal staff members on
an as-needed basis. The MPO will include designated Tribal staff members or representatives
on email distribution lists to receive notifications of all upcoming MPO advisory committee and
Board meetings. MPO staff will provide convenient access to meeting agendas and packets for
review and be available to answer questions.
VII. Application of Tribal Consultation Policy
1. The MPO will make a good-faith effort to review all proposed plans, policies, rulemakings, actions
or other aspects of the transportation planning process that may affect or impact Tribal resources
and determine whether Tribal consultation or collaboration may assist in the process. The MPO
will notify Tribal governments and inquire whether Tribal consultation should occur. Tribal
Officials have the discretion whether to engage in the consultation process. Consultation will be
initiated by formal, written request.
2. If the MPO does not receive a response from a Tribe requesting a response to a proposed plan,
project or other matter that may affect or impact a Tribal government, the MPO is encouraged to
follow up further with the Tribal government to ascertain its level of interest. If no response is
provided, the MPO believes that it is only appropriate to move forward after the following: (a)
directly contacting a Tribal government authorized representative to solicit its participation,
review and comment after providing sufficient time for the Tribe’s review and response; (b) that
the direct communication/request for information or comment include a date when the MPO
would like the response; and (c) that a minimum of thirty (30) days be provided for the Tribal
government to provide for requests for information, or review and comment on draft documents.
3. The MPO recognizes that formal consultation may not be required in all situations or interactions.
Tribal staff members and MPO staff may communicate on an as-needed basis. These
communications do not negate the authority of the MPO and the Tribes to pursue formal
consultation.
4. This policy will not diminish any administrative or legal remedies otherwise available by law to
the MPO or the Tribe. This policy shall not be construed to waive the sovereign immunity of any
party or create a cause of action for either party for failing to comply with this policy.
5. This policy is a working document and may be revised as needed. The MPO will consult
periodically with the Tribes to evaluate its effectiveness and determine the need for revision.
6. The policy shall become effective upon the date signed by the MPO Chair following approval by
the MPO Board.
9.E.2
Packet Pg. 995 Attachment: Amended PPP – Clean Version (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
44 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
APPENDIX B: LEE COUNTY MPO/COLLIER MPO INTERLOCAL
AGREEMENT
9.E.2
Packet Pg. 996 Attachment: Amended PPP – Clean Version (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
45 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
9.E.2
Packet Pg. 997 Attachment: Amended PPP – Clean Version (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
46 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
9.E.2
Packet Pg. 998 Attachment: Amended PPP – Clean Version (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
47 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
9.E.2
Packet Pg. 999 Attachment: Amended PPP – Clean Version (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
48 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
9.E.2
Packet Pg. 1000 Attachment: Amended PPP – Clean Version (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
49 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
9.E.2
Packet Pg. 1001 Attachment: Amended PPP – Clean Version (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
50 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
9.E.2
Packet Pg. 1002 Attachment: Amended PPP – Clean Version (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
51 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
APPENDIX C. Limited English Proficiency Plan
9.E.2
Packet Pg. 1003 Attachment: Amended PPP – Clean Version (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
52 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY PLAN
The Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) is responsible for a continuing, cooperative, and
comprehensive transportation planning process in Collier County (as well as a small portion of Lee County
included in the MPO’s Planning Area). This planning process guides the use of federal and state dollars
spent on existing and future transportation projects or programs, and the Limited English Proficiency
(LEP) Plan plays an integral role in this process. This document will detail the LEP Plan, developed in
conjunction with best practice standards for public involvement.
Introduction
On August 11, 2000, President William J. Clinton signed an executive order, Executive Order 13166:
Improving Access to Service for Persons with Limited English Proficiency, to clarify Title VI of the Civil
Rights Act of 1964. Its purpose was to ensure accessibility to programs and services to eligible persons
who are not proficient in the English language.
This executive order stated that individuals who do not speak English well and who have a limited ability
to read, write, speak, or understand English are entitled to language assistance under Title VI of the Civil
Rights Act of 1964 with respect to a particular type of service, benefit, or encounter. It reads in part,
“Each Federal agency shall prepare a plan to improve access to its federally conducted
programs and activities by eligible LEP persons. Each plan shall be consistent with the
standards set forth in the LEP Guidance and shall include the steps the agency will take to
ensure that eligible LEP persons can meaningfully access the agency's programs and
activities.”
Not only do all federal agencies have to develop LEP Plans, as a condition of receiving federal financial
assistance, but also state and local recipients are required to comply with Title VI and LEP guidelines of
the federal agency from which they receive funds.
Federal financial assistance includes grants, training, use of equipment, donations of surplus property and
other assistance. Recipients of federal funds range from state and local agencies to nonprofits and other
organizations. Title VI covers a recipient's entire program or activity. This means all components of a
recipient's operations are covered. Simply put, any organization that receives federal financial assistance
is required to follow this Executive Order.
The US Department of Transportation (DOT) published: “Policy Guidance Concerning Recipients’
Responsibilities to Limited English Proficient Person” in the December 14, 2005 Federal Register. The
guidance explicitly identifies MPOs as organizations that must follow this guidance:
The guidance applies to all DOT funding recipients, which include state departments of
transportation, state motor vehicle administrations, airport operators, metropolitan
planning organizations, and regional, state, and local transit operators, among many
others. Coverage extends to a recipient’s entire program or activity, i.e., to all parts of a
recipient’s operations. This is true even if only one part of the recipient receives the Federal
assistance. For example, if DOT provides assistance to a state department of
9.E.2
Packet Pg. 1004 Attachment: Amended PPP – Clean Version (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
53 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
transportation to rehabilitate a particular highway on the National Highway System, all
of the operations of the entire state department of transportation—not just the particular
highway program or project—are covered by the DOT guidance.
The intent of this Limited English Proficiency Plan is to ensure access to the planning process and
information published by the MPO where it is determined that a substantial number of residents in the
Collier MPO Planning Area do not speak or read English proficiently. The production of multilingual
publications and documents and/or interpretation at meetings or events will be provided to the degree
that funding permits based on current laws and regulations.
Laws and Policies Guiding Limited English Proficiency Plans
As part of Metropolitan Planning Organization certification by the Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA) and the Federal Transit Administration (FTA), the LEP Plan will be assessed and
evaluated. The following matrix illustrates these laws, policies and considerations:
Rights A
Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
Limited English Proficiency Executive Order
13166
Federal Law Federal Policy
Enacted in 1964 Enacted in August 2000
Considers all persons Considers eligible population
Contains monitoring and oversight compliance
review requirements
Contains monitoring and oversight compliance
review requirements
Factor criteria is required, no numerical or
percentage thresholds
Factor criteria is required, no numerical or
percentage thresholds
Provides protection on the basis of race, color, and
national origin
Provides protection on the basis of national origin
Focuses on eliminating discrimination in federally
funded programs
Focuses on providing LEP persons with meaningful
access to services using four factor criteria
Annual Accomplishment and Upcoming Goals
Report to FHWA
Annual Accomplishment and Upcoming Goals
Report to FHWA
Who is an LEP individual?
As defined in the 2000 United States Census, it is any Individual who speaks a language at home other
than English as his/her primary language, and who speaks or understands English ‘not well’ or ‘not at all’.
Determining the need
As a recipient of federal funding, the MPO must take reasonable steps to ensure meaningful access to the
information and services it provides. As noticed in the Federal Register/ Volume 70, Number 239/
Wednesday, December 14, 2005/ Notices, there are four factors to consider in determining “reasonable
steps”.
• Factor 1 - The number and proportion of LEP persons in the eligible service area;
• Factor 2 - The frequency with which LEP persons encounter MPO programs;
9.E.2
Packet Pg. 1005 Attachment: Amended PPP – Clean Version (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
54 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
• Factor 3 - The importance of the service provided by MPO programs;
• Factor 4 - The resources available and overall cost to the MPO.
The DOT Policy Guidance gives recipients of federal funds substantial flexibility in determining what
language assistance is appropriate based on a local assessment of the four factors listed above. The
following is an assessment of need in Collier MPO’s Planning Area in relation to the four factors and the
transportation planning process.
LEP Assessment for the Collier MPO
Factor 1. The Number and proportion of LEP persons in the eligible service area
The first step towards understanding the profile of individuals who could participate in the transportation
planning process is a review of Census data. Tables 1 and 2 on the following pages display the primary
language spoken and number of individuals that are LEP. In Collier County, between 2010 and 2016, the
number of people who speak a language other than English at home increased by 16,000 while the
number of people who speak English less than “very well” decreased by 1,000.
For our planning purposes, we are considering people that speak English ‘less than very well’ and only the
top four language groups are included in the analysis.
Table 1, derived from the 2016 American Community Survey (ACS) 5-year Estimates conducted by the US
Census, shows the number and percent of the population, with regard to their English language skills, for
the cities and unincorporated portions of Collier County as well as for the County as a whole. In
unincorporated Collier County, 15.7% of the population age 5 years or older speak English less than “very
well”, compared to 14.5 for the entire County 2
Table 1: Limited English Proficient Persons in the MPO Planning area and local jurisdictions
2016 American Community Survey – US Census - 5-year estimates
Jurisdiction Population
Population
5 years and
over
Number of LEP
Persons (5
years and over)
Percentage of
LEP Persons (5
years and over)
Everglades City 232 228 11 4.8%
City of Naples 20,980 20,510 828 4.0%
City of Marco Island 17,361 17,135 1,115 6.5%
Unincorporated Collier County
309,663 293,645 46,143 15.7%
Collier County 348,236 331,518 48,097 14.5%
Table 2 shows the number and percent of LEP persons by language spoken at the individual’s home. Of
the LEP persons within Collier County, 23.4% speak Spanish at home making this the most significant
percentage of the area’s population. The second most common language at home is Other Indo-European
2 2016 American Community Survey (ACS) 5-year Estimates, Tables B01003, S1601.
9.E.2
Packet Pg. 1006 Attachment: Amended PPP – Clean Version (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
55 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
languages at 7.8%; Asian and Pacific Islander languages represent 0.9% of the “other” languages spoken
at home.
Table 2: Language Spoken at Home by LEP Persons - Collier MPO Planning Area
2016 American Community Survey, 5-year Estimates, US Census
LEP Persons
Spanish
Language
Other Indo-
European
Languages
Asian &
Pacific
Islander
Languages
Other
Languages
5 years and over - Everglades City 9 7 0 0
5 years and over - City of Naples 658 1,216 83 14
5 years and over - Marco Island 1,162 1,006 176 71
5 years and over – Unincorporated County 75,843 23,630 2,750 764
5 years and over - Total 77,672 25,859 3,009 849
Percent of Total Population 5 years and over 23.4% 7.8% 0.9% 0.3%
Factor 2. The frequency in which LEP Persons encounter MPO programs
The MPO documents phone inquiries, public meetings and office visits. To date, the MPO has had no
requests for interpreters and no requests for translated program documents or publications by either
individuals or groups.
Factor 3. The importance of the service provided by the MPO program
MPO programs use federal funds to plan for future transportation projects, and therefore do not include
any direct service or program that requires vital, immediate or emergency assistance, such as medical
treatment or services for basic needs (like food or shelter). Further, the MPO does not conduct required
activities such as applications, interviews or other activities prior to participation in its programs or events.
Involvement by any citizen with the MPO or its committees is voluntary.
However, the MPO must ensure that all segments of the population, including LEP persons, have been
involved or have had the opportunity to be involved in the transportation planning process to be
consistent with the goal of the Federal Environmental Justice program and policy. The impact of proposed
transportation investments on underserved and under-represented population groups is part of the
evaluation process in use of federal funds in three major areas for the MPO:
• the biennial Unified Planning Work Program,
• the five-year Transportation Improvement Program,
• the Long-Range Transportation Plan, covering 20+ years.
Inclusive public participation is a priority consideration in other MPO plans, studies and programs as well.
The impacts of transportation improvements resulting from these planning activities have an impact on
all residents. Understanding and continued involvement are encouraged throughout the process. The
9.E.2
Packet Pg. 1007 Attachment: Amended PPP – Clean Version (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
56 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
MPO is concerned with input from all stakeholders and makes every effort to ensure that the planning
process is as inclusive as possible.
As a result of the long range
transportation planning process,
selected projects receive approval for
federal funding and progress towards
project planning and construction
under the responsibility of local
jurisdictions or state transportation
agencies. These state and local
organizations have their own policies
to ensure LEP individuals can
participate in the process that shapes
where, how and when a specific
transportation project is implemented.
Factor 4. The resources available and overall MPO cost
Given the size of the LEP population in the MPO area, the current financial constraints of the MPO and
the expense of full multi-language translations of large transportation plan documents and maps which
have frequent changes and are not often used by the public, translation of MPO documents is not
considered to be warranted at this time.
The MPO will continue efforts to collaborate with state and local agencies to provide language translation
and interpretation services when practical and funding is available. Spanish and other language outreach
materials from organizations such as federal, state, and local transportation agencies will be used when
possible. The MPO will monitor increases in the LEP population and adjust its LEP policy accordingly. If
warranted in the future, the MPO will consider new techniques to reach the LEP population, such as (1)
the translation of executive summaries for key MPO documents, such as the Long Range Transportation
Plan, the Transportation Improvement Program, and the Public Involvement Plan, and (2) the translation
of document summaries, brochures or newsletters, which are designed to capture significant points of
the full document. Additionally, the MPO currently has an employee that is fluent in both English and
Spanish. In addition, Collier County Growth Management Division and the Alternative Transportation
Modes Department have employees fluent in English, Spanish and Haitian Creole, and are available as
interpreters as needed.
MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS
Engaging the diverse population within the MPO area is important. The MPO is committed to providing
quality services to all citizens, including those with limited English proficiency. All language access
activities detailed below will be coordinated in collaboration with the MPO Board and staff.
Safe Harbor Stipulation
Federal law provides a ‘safe harbor’ stipulation so recipients of federal funding can ensure compliance
with their obligation to provide written translations in languages other than English with greater certainty.
A ‘safe harbor’ means that as long as a recipient (the MPO) has created a plan for the provision of written
TRANSLATION OF MPO DOCUMENTS IS NOT
CONSIDERED TO BE WARRANTED AT THIS TIME.
THE MPO WILL CONTINUE EFFORTS TO
COLLABORATE WITH STATE AND LOCAL AGENCIES
TO PROVIDE LANGUAGE TRANSLATION AND
INTERPRETATION SERVICES WHEN PRACTICAL
AND FUNDING IS AVAILABLE
9.E.2
Packet Pg. 1008 Attachment: Amended PPP – Clean Version (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
57 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
translations under a specific set of circumstances, such action will be considered strong evidence of
compliance with written translation obligations under Title VI.
However, failure to provide written translations under the circumstances does not mean there is
noncompliance, but rather provides for recipients a guide for greater certainty of compliance in
accordance with the four-factor analysis. Evidence of compliance with the recipient’s written translation
obligations under ‘safe harbor’ includes providing written translations of vital documents for each eligible
LEP language group that constitutes 5% or 1,000 persons, whichever is less of eligible persons served or
likely to be affected. (Note: At this time, data on area language groups indicates that this requirement
does not apply.) Translation also can be provided orally. The ‘safe harbor’ provision applies to the
translation of written documents only. It does not affect the requirement to provide meaningful access to
LEP individuals through competent oral interpreters where oral language services are needed and
reasonable to provide.
Providing Notice to LEP Persons
US DOT guidance indicates that once an agency has decided, based on the four factors, to provide
language services, it is important that the recipient notify LEP persons of services available free of charge
in a language the LEP persons would understand. Example methods for notification include:
1. Signage that indicates when free language assistance is available with advance notice;
2. Stating in outreach documents that language services are available;
3. Working with community-based organizations and other stakeholders to inform LEP individuals of
MPO services and the availability of language assistance;
4. Using automated telephone voice mail or menu to provide information about available language
assistance services;
5. Including notices in local publications targeting Spanish-speaking and Haitian-Creole-speaking ng
audiences in languages other than English;
6. Providing notices on non-English-language radio and television about MPO services and the
availability of language assistance; and
7. Providing presentations and/or notices at schools and community-based organizations (CBO).
If deemed essential in the future in light of revised census data, the MPO will publicize the availability of
interpreter services, free of charge, at least 7 days prior to MPO Board and committee meetings,
workshops, forums or events which will be noticed on the MPO website, in meeting notices (packets), and
using the following additional tools as appropriate:
• signage
• public outreach materials
• community-based organizations
• local publications as referenced above
• Non-English-language radio and television
The MPO defines an interpreter as a person who translates spoken language orally, as opposed to a
translator, who translates written language and transfers the meaning of written text from one language
into another. The MPO will request language interpreter services from Collier County staff, as needed,
and will reciprocate by making MPO staff available as needed. As covered under Title VI requirements for
9.E.2
Packet Pg. 1009 Attachment: Amended PPP – Clean Version (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
58 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
nondiscrimination, at each meeting, the MPO will provide Title VI material and include this material in an
alternative language when applicable.
Language Assistance
A goal of the PPP is to provide user-friendly materials that will be appealing and easy to understand. The
MPO will provide on an “as needed” basis, executive summaries in alternative formats, such as brochures
or newsletters, depending on the work product.
MPO Staff Training
This LEP Plan is incorporated in the PIP to maintain meaningful access to information and services for LEP
individuals, the MPO will properly train its employees to assist in person, and/or by telephone, LEP
individuals who request assistance. MPO Board members will receive a briefing on the PIP & LEP Plan,
assuring that they are aware of and understand how the PIP implements the LEP Plan.
9.E.2
Packet Pg. 1010 Attachment: Amended PPP – Clean Version (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
59 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
APPENDIX D. NONDISCRIMINATION PLAN AND COMPLAINT
PROCEDURE
9.E.2
Packet Pg. 1011 Attachment: Amended PPP – Clean Version (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
60 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
Title VI Nondiscrimination Program Policy and Complaint Procedure
Introduction
The Collier MPO is a recipient of federal funds from the U.S. Department of Transportation modal
agencies, including the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and the Federal Transit Administration
(FTA). All recipients of federal funding must comply with the requirements of Title VI of the Civil Rights
Act of 1964 and other nondiscrimination statutes, regulations and authorities. This Implementation Plan
describes how the Department effectuates nondiscrimination in the delivery of its federally assisted
programs, services and activities. The Plan includes the structure of the MPO’s Title VI/Nondiscrimination
program as well as the policies, procedures and practices that the Department uses to comply with
nondiscrimination requirements. The Plan is intended to be a living document, regularly policed and
updated by the Department to meaningfully reflect the program as it changes and grows. Anyone wishing
to provide input into the Department’s Title VI/Nondiscrimination Implementation Plan is encouraged to
contact the Title VI/Nondiscrimination Program Coordinator, Anne McLaughlin at
AnneMcLaughlin@colliercountyfl.gov or 239-252-5884 or by writing at 2885 South Horseshoe Drive,
Naples, FL 34104.
Policy Statement
It is the policy of the MPO to comply with all federal and state authorities requiring nondiscrimination,
including but not limited to Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987,
Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA), the Age
Discrimination Act of 1975 and Executive Order 12898 (Environmental Justice) and 13166 (Limited English
Proficiency). The MPO does not and will not exclude from participation in; deny the benefits of; or subject
anyone to discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, age, disability or income. In
addition, the MPO complies with the Florida Civil Rights Act, and does not permit discrimination on the
basis of religion or family status in its programs, services or activities.
The Collier MPO has adopted the Florida Department of Transportation’s (Department) Title
VI/Nondiscrimination policy and ADA policy by reference. Topic No.:275-010-010-f–Title VI Program and
Related Statutes-Implementation and Review Procedures.
The Department’s Title VI/Nondiscrimination policy and ADA policy statement may be found at: US DOJ
Title VI Nondiscrimination Policy. Those requiring information in alternative formats or in a language
subject to the Department’s Limited English Proficiency (LEP) Plan, should contact the Title
VI/Nondiscrimination Coordinator.
MPO DISCRIMINATION COMPLAINT PROCEDURE
Any person who believes that he or she, or any specific class of persons, has been subjected to
discrimination or retaliation prohibited by the Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, and
related statutes, under the MPO’s planning process may file a written complaint.
The MPO encourages the filing of a complaint in writing which includes a name, address, and other
information so that you may be contacted in regard to the matter. Please see the Title VI Complaint Form.
9.E.2
Packet Pg. 1012 Attachment: Amended PPP – Clean Version (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
61 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
The MPO will investigate complaints received no more than 180 days after the alleged incident. The MPO
will process complaints that are complete.
• All complaints will be investigated promptly. Reasonable measures will be undertaken to preserve
any information that is confidential. The MPO’s Title VI Specialist will review every complaint to
determine if our office has jurisdiction.
• Within ten (10) calendar days, the Title VI Specialist will acknowledge receipt of the allegation(s),
inform the Complainant of action taken or proposed action to process the allegation(s), and advise
the Complainant of other avenues of redress available, such as the FDOT’s Equal Opportunity
Office (EOO).
• The MPO has sixty (60) calendar days to investigate the complaint. If more information is needed
to resolve the complaint, the MPO’s Title VI Specialist will contact the complainant. The
complainant has 10 business days from the date of the letter to send the requested information
to the Title VI Specialist. If the Title VI Specialist is not contacted by the complainant or does not
receive the additional information within 15 business days, the MPO may administratively close
the case. A case can also be administratively closed if the complainant no longer wishes to pursue
their case.
• At a minimum, the investigation will:
o Identify and review all relevant documents, practices, and procedures;
o Identify and interview persons with knowledge of the Title VI violation, including the
person making the complaint, witnesses, or anyone identified by the complainant;
anyone who may have been subject to similar activity or anyone with relevant
information.
• Within ninety (90) calendar days of the complaint, the MPO’s Title VI Specialist will issue one of
two letters to the complainant: a closure letter or a letter of finding (LOF). A closure letter
summarizes the allegations and states that there was not a Title VI violation and that the case will
be closed. An LOF summarizes the allegations and the interviews regarding the alleged incident,
and explains whether any disciplinary action, additional training of the staff members or other
action will occur.
• If no violation is found and the complainant wishes to appeal the decision, he/she has fourteen
(14) days after the date of the letter or the LOF to do so.
• If the issue has not been satisfactorily resolved through the MPO’s investigation, or if at any time
the person(s) request(s) to file a formal complaint, the recipient’s MPO Title VI Specialist shall
refer the Complainant to the FDOT’s District One Title VI Coordinator for processing in accordance
with approved State procedures.
• The MPO’s Title VI Specialist will advise the FDOT’s District One Title VI Coordinator within five (5)
calendar days of the completed investigation. The following information will be included in every
notification to the FDOT’s District One Title VI Coordinator:
9.E.2
Packet Pg. 1013 Attachment: Amended PPP – Clean Version (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
62 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
(a) Name, address, and phone number of the Complainant.
(b) Name(s) and address(es) of Respondent.
(c) Basis of complaint (i.e., race, color, national origin, sex, age, disability, religion, familial
status or retaliation).
(d) Date of alleged discriminatory act(s).
(e) Date of complaint received by the recipient.
(f) A statement of the complaint.
(g) Other agencies (state, local or Federal) where the complaint has been filed.
(h) An explanation of the actions the recipient has taken or proposed to resolve the
allegation(s) raised in the complaint.
• The MPO’s Title VI Specialist will maintain a log of complaints received by the MPO. The log will
include the following information:
o Name of Complainant
o Name of Respondent
o Basis of Complaint (i.e., race, color, national origin, sex, age, disability, religion, familial
status or retaliation)
o Date complaint was received by the recipient
o Date that the MPO Title VI Specialist notified the FDOT’s District One Title VI Coordinator
of the complaint
o Explanation of the actions the recipient has taken or proposed to resolve the issue raised
in the complaint
The MPO’s planning process is conducted in
accordance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
and Related Statutes. Any person or beneficiary who
believes as part of the MPO planning process they
have been discriminated against because of race,
color, religion, sex, age, national origin, disability, or
familial status may file a complaint with the Collier
MPO Title VI Specialist Anne McLaughlin (239) 252-
5884 by writing Ms. McLaughlin at 2885 South
Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 or via email at:
annemclaughlin@colliergov.net; or by contacting
Brandy Otero, Principal Planner, by phone at 239-252-
5859, in writing at the above address, or via email at:
brandyotero@colliercountyfl.gov
9.E.2
Packet Pg. 1014 Attachment: Amended PPP – Clean Version (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
63 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
Title VI Complaint Form
Before completing this form, please read the Collier MPO’s Title VI Complaint Procedures
located on our website or by visiting our office.
The following information is necessary and required to assist in processing your complaint. If
you require assistance in completing this form, please contact us at the phone number listed.
Complaints must be filed within 180 calendar days after the date alleged discrimination
occurred.
Complainant’s Name: __________________________________________________________ Address: ________________________________________________________________________ City: __________________________ State: _________________ Zip Code: ______________ Telephone Numbers: Home __________Work: _____________ Cell: ______________ E-mail Address: ________________________________________________________________ Date of alleged discrimination: _______________________________________________ Which of the following best describes the reason you believe the discrimination took place? Was it because of your: Race/Color: ____________ National Origin:____________ Person discriminated against (if someone other than complainant). Please confirm that you have obtained the permission of the aggrieved party if you are filing on behalf of a third party. Name_______________________________________________________________________ Address: ___________________________________________________________________ City: _______________________ State: ___________ Zip Code: _________________ Have you filed this complaint with any other federal, state, or local agency? Yes No If yes, check each box that applies:
9.E.2
Packet Pg. 1015 Attachment: Amended PPP – Clean Version (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
64 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN Federal Transit Administration Department of Transportation Dept. of Justice Equal Opportunity Commission Other: _______________________________________________________ Have you filed a lawsuit regarding this complaint? Yes No In your own words, describe the alleged discrimination. Explain what happened and whom you believe was responsible. Include specific details such as names, dates, times, route numbers, witnesses, and any other information that would assist us in our investigation of the allegations. Please also provide any other documentation that is relevant to this complaint. Complainant’s Signature Date
9.E.2
Packet Pg. 1016 Attachment: Amended PPP – Clean Version (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
65 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
APPENDIX E – TRADITIONALLY UNDERSERVED COMMUNITIES
9.E.2
Packet Pg. 1017 Attachment: Amended PPP – Clean Version (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
66 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
Environmental Justice Communities / Traditionally Underserved Communities
The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) advised the MPO during the quadrennial Transportation
Management Area (TMA) review in 2016 to incorporate an analysis of Environmental Justice Communities
and issues in all new plans and studies. The FHWA advised MPO staff to include the type of analysis
conducted for the MPO’s Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan.
According to guidance published by the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), it is important to
see Environmental Justice as an opportunity to make better transportation decisions by doing the
following:
• Making transportation decisions that meet the needs of all people
• Designing facilities that fit into communities
• Enhancing the public involvement process and strengthening community-based partnerships
• Improving the tools for analyzing the impacts of transportation decisions on minority and low-
income communities
• Partnering with other public and private agencies to leverage resources and achieve a common
vision for communities
MPO staff began by reviewing the MPO’s Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP), Major
Update, adopted October 25, 2013 for maps showing Populations in Poverty, Households with No Vehicles
and Identified Areas of Need as a starting point in identifying disadvantaged communities potentially
underserved by transportation infrastructure and programs within Collier County.
FHWA advised using a variety of resources, and local knowledge to determine the location and needs of
disadvantaged communities. MPO staff augmented the TDSP maps using the following sources:
• US Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS)
• American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Census
Transportation Planning Products (CTPP)
• US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Environmental Justice (EJ) Screening and Mapping Tool
• MPO Advisory Committee review of findings (for local knowledge)
To address the issue of equity in terms of providing equal access to bicycle and pedestrian facilities
County-wide, the MPO’s previous identification of Environmental Justice (EJ) communities was updated
for the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan (2019). The EJ criteria used for the BPMP were minority status,
poverty, no access to a vehicle, and limited ability to speak English. EJ areas were defined as areas where
the criteria were 10% greater than the County average. The map on the following page shows the results
of the EJ analysis. The map may be viewed in larger format on the MPO website.
9.E.2
Packet Pg. 1018 Attachment: Amended PPP – Clean Version (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
67 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
Environmental Justice (EJ) Communities, Collier County, 2019
9.E.2
Packet Pg. 1019 Attachment: Amended PPP – Clean Version (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
68 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
APPENDIX F – STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES
9.E.2
Packet Pg. 1020 Attachment: Amended PPP – Clean Version (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN UPDATES – PROCESS
Major Update
•Major Updates occur as needed, based on
Board’s Annual Review, often triggered by new
federal or state requirements that must be
Public Comment
Period
•45 days prior to Board meeting to adopt the plan
•Post draft plan, Notice of Public Comment Period,
and Comment Forms on MPO Website; and
•Distribute via Listserv(s)
•Hard copies available on request via phone or email
Response to Public
Comments
•MPO staff respond verbally or in writing
•Significant comments & staff response included in an
appendix in draft plan submitted to Board for
adoption
Adoption
•MPO Board meets at end of public comment period
•MPO Board considers the significant public
comments received and recommendations from
advisory committees before adopting the plan
Minor Updates
•Minor Updates, approved by the Board as part of
the Annual Review at the time the MPO Director
presents the Annual Report
Posting Minor Updates
•Post Minor Update on MPO Website; and
•Distribute notice of availability via
Listserv(s); hard copies available on request
•Hard copies available on request via phone
69
9.E.2
Packet Pg. 1021 Attachment: Amended PPP – Clean Version (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN - PROCESS
Major Updates &
Amendments •Major Update adopted every 5 years
•20-year planning horizon
Public Outreach &
Opportunities to
Comment
•Schedule 1 or more public meetings, open houses,
or workshops; provide notice at least 7 days in
advance via website, email listserv & email to
advisory committee members, Adviser Network,
Tribal agencies
•Post interactive surveys, opportunities to comment,
interactive maps, etc. on MPO website
Public Involvement
Plan (PIP)
•See PIP for specific instructions &
opportunities to comment
•Will include MPO hosting booths at various
locations, such as farmers markets, bus
transfer stations, street fairs: & MPO hosting
virtual and actual public meetings
Public Comment
Period
•Coincides with review of final draft by TAC &
CAC, announced on website & via email to
listserv(s) on date TAC/CAC agenda packets
posted & distributed
•Comments received by MPO prior to posting
MPO Board meeting packet will be
addressed & reported in the packet
•Public may also comment at MPO Board
Meeting
Administrative
Modifications
•Minor revisions, do not require public review &
comment; will be included in agenda packets to
CAC/TAC and MPO Board as distribution items
70
9.E.2
Packet Pg. 1022 Attachment: Amended PPP – Clean Version (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
TIP - PROCESS
Annual Update &
Amendments
•Updated annually and adopted by MPO Board
by June 30th then transmitted to FDOT for
inclusion in State Transportation
Improvement Program
Public Comment
Period
•Coincides with review of final draft by TAC & CAC,
announced on website & via email to listserv(s) on
date TAC/CAC agenda packets posted &
distributed
•Comments received by MPO prior to posting MPO
Board meeting packet will be addressed &
reported in the packet
Response
•MPO staff will respond in writing to input
received from the public & report significant
comments & staff’s response to MPO Board in
summary format as an appendix
Adoption
•MPO Board will consider comments received
from the public and recommendations from
advisory committees before adopting TIP by a
roll call vote
Administrative
Modifications
•do not require public review & comment;
will be included in agenda packets to
CAC/TAC and MPO Board as distribution
items; simultaneously posted on MPO
website &sent out via listserv(s)
71
9.E.2
Packet Pg. 1023 Attachment: Amended PPP – Clean Version (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
UNIFIED PLANNING WORK PROGRAM - PROCESS
2 Year UPWP
Adoption &
Amendments
•2 Year UPWP is adopted every other year
and may be amended as needed
Kick-Off
Meeting
•MPO staff hold initial information
gathering meeting with appropriate
agencies
Public Comment
Period
•Coincides with review of final draft by TAC &
CAC, announced on website & via email to
listserv(s) on date TAC/CAC agenda packets
posted & distributed
Response
•MPO staff will respond in writing to input
received from the public & report
significant comments & staff’s response
to MPO Board in summary format as an
appendix
Adoption
Modifications
•MPO Board will consider comments received
from the public and recommendations from
advisory committees before adopting TIP by
regular vote
•do not require public review & comment; will be
included in agenda packets to CAC/TAC and MPO
Board as distribution items; simultaneously posted
on MPO website &sent out via listserv(s)
72
9.E.2
Packet Pg. 1024 Attachment: Amended PPP – Clean Version (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
TDSP – MAJOR & MINOR UPDATES - PROCESS
Major & Minor
TDSP Updates
•Major Update adopted every 5 years
•Minor Update completed & adopted annually
Public Comment
Period
•Major Update: 30-day comment period
•Minor Update: 14-day comment period-
Public Notice
•Post legal ad in Naples Daily News and on
MPO website including opportunities to
comment electronically on website
•Distribute copies of Update and/or QRC to LCB
members and MPO listserv(s)
•Distribute copies of the Major TDSP Update
and/or QRC on comment forms to local
government agency offices and libraries
•Major update: Distribute flyers & comment
forms on transit vehicles notifying riders of the
comment period & adoption meeting & post
flyers/posters at CAT transfer stations
Response
•MPO staff will respond in writing to public
input received during the comment period
•When significant written and verbal comments
are received, a summary, analysis or report will
be included in an appendix to the plan
Adoption
•LCB will meet at end of public comment
period & consider comments received before
adopting TDSP by Roll Call vote
•MPO Board will ratify update after adoption
by LCB; may occur on Consent Agenda
73
9.E.2
Packet Pg. 1025 Attachment: Amended PPP – Clean Version (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
MISCELLANEOUS PLANS & DOCUMENTS - PROCESS
Public Outreach - CMP
•Congestion Management Process (CMP)
•Transit Development Plan (TDP)
•Topical Studies – such as Freight, Emerging
Technologies, Road Safety Audits
•CMP – Congestion Management Committee
initiates; TAC/CAC review; MPO Board
adopts (CMP)
•FDOT, the Regional Workforce
Development Board (CareerSource
Southwest Florida) shall be advised of all
public meetings where the TDP is to be
presented or discussed and shall be given
the opportunity to review and comment on
the TDP during the development of the
mission, goals, objectives, alternatives, and
ten-year implementation plan
•Have TDP focused public involvement plan,
approved by FDOT
•Public Transit Committee reviews in
process managed by Collier County Public
Transportation & Neighborhood
Enhancement Division
•MPO staff initiates study
•Advisory committees review & comment
•Board accepts, approves or adopts final
recommendations as appropriate
Miscellaneous
Plans &
Documents
Public Outreach - TDP
Public Outreach –
Topical Studies
74
9.E.2
Packet Pg. 1026 Attachment: Amended PPP – Clean Version (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
In the event that the MPO coordinates in the development, or share in the usage of a plan, study or
document with other agencies, the MPO will follow the guidelines established in this PPP. Other
agencies may have their own public involvement requirements and should comply with them
separately.
Public Comment
Opportunities
•TDP - Transit Agency is authorized to establish time
limits for receipt of comments (FAC 14.73.001)
•MPO staff follows notification requirements for
advisory committees and Board
•Additional opportunity to comment posted on
MPO website and sent to listserv(s) via email
•Topical Studies – MPO will host a discussion forum
•MPO staff will respond in writing to input received
from the public & report significant comments &
staff’s response to MPO Board in summary format
as an appendix to the document
Response
75
9.E.2
Packet Pg. 1027 Attachment: Amended PPP – Clean Version (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
BOARD & COMMITTEE MEETING NOTICE REQUIREMENTS
MPO Board
TAC, CAC
CMC
BPAC
Joint Collier/Lee
MPO Meetings
•Post agenda packet on MPO website 7 calendar
days prior to meeting date
•Distribute packet via email to committee
members & listserv(s) (hard copies provided on
request to MPO staff)
•Distribute press releases
LCB Meetings
•Post legal ad in Naples Daily News & post
agenda packet on MPO website 7 calendar
days prior to date of meeting
•Distribute packet via email to committee
members & listserv(s) (hard copies provided on
request to MPO staff)
76
9.E.2
Packet Pg. 1028 Attachment: Amended PPP – Clean Version (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
PUBLIC OUTREACH TECHNIQUES USED BY MPO
Visualization
Techniques
•Enhanced - video, simulation modes,
animated graphics and 3D imaging
•Traditional – maps, pictures, graphics, logo
Website
•Enhanced – interactive maps, surveys,
opportunities to comment
•Traditional – News, Plans, Studies, Committees,
Bylaws, Meeting Calendar, etc.
E-Notifications &
Social Media
•Enhanced – Adviser Network listserv;
Facebook, YouTube
•Traditional – Notification listserv; mail &
hard copies available on request
Surveys & Polls •Enhanced – Survey Monkey; & consultant
supported project-specific
•Traditional – Person to person outreach;
hard copies, booths, meetings
Partnering •Enhanced – project-specific partnering
•Traditional – piggy-back on special events
conducted by member entities
Public Television
•Enhanced - videos, Public Service
Announcements
•Traditional – MPO Board Meetings Live &
Archived
77
9.E.2
Packet Pg. 1029 Attachment: Amended PPP – Clean Version (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
Comment
Forms
•Enhanced – on-line, electronic version
•Traditional – hard copy handouts at
meetings, print and mail-in options
QR Codes •Traditional – long-standing MPO
practice of printing QR codes on
cover pages of major documents
Orientations •Traditional – long-standing MPO
practice of conducting individual
orientations for new Board and
advisory committee members
78
9.E.2
Packet Pg. 1030 Attachment: Amended PPP – Clean Version (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
Earned Media
•Enhanced – cultivate media contacts &
provide background information on events
•Traditional – send press releases on events of
general public interest
Project Specific
Public Involvement
Plans
•Traditional – long-standing MPO practice for
major plans such as the LRTP, Community
Walkability Studies and Bicycle and Pedestrian
Master Plan
Monthly Newsletter •Traditional – long-standing MPO practice;
available in hard copy, posted to MPO
website and distributed via email to Board,
committees, listserv(s)
Public Workshops
& Open Houses
•Traditional – long-standing MPO practice;
generally held in the context of major plan
development and consultant supported
Public Meetings •Traditional – long-standing MPO practice;
includes MPO and advisory committee
meetings, project specific meetings generally
held in context of major plan development
Community
Outreach
Events
•Traditional – long-standing MPO practice;
may be linked to major plan development or
opportunities for MPO staff to piggy-back on
special events to increase general public
79
9.E.2
Packet Pg. 1031 Attachment: Amended PPP – Clean Version (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
80 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
APPENDIX G – GROUPS, BUSINESSES, & AGENCIES CONSULTED WITH
IN DEVELOPING THIS PLAN
The following groups, businesses and agencies are members of the MPO’s Adviser Network, along with
roughly 400 private citizens who received notification of the revisions and the opportunity to comment.
Ms. Rae Ann Burton and Ms. April Olson (Conservancy of Southwest Florida) submitted public comments
as shown in Appendix H.
Federal Lands Management Agencies
•National Park Service (Everglades National Park and Big Cypress National Preserve)
•US Fish and Wildlife Service (Florida Panther National Wildlife Refuge, Ten Thousand Islands
National Wildlife Refuge)
State Land Management Agencies
•National Estuarine Research Reserve – Rookery Bay and Cape Romano – Ten Thousand Islands
Aquatic Preserve
•Collier-Seminole State Park
•Picayune Strand State Forest
•Fakahatchee Strand Preserve State Park
•Delnor-Wiggins Pass State Park
•Okaloacoochee Slough State Forest
•South Florida Water Management District
•Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission
Land Management Nonprofit Agencies
•National Audubon Society – Corkscrew Swamp Sanctuary
Native American Tribes
•Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida, Business Council
•Seminole Tribe of Florida, Chairman and General Counsel
MPO Advisory Committees
•Citizens Advisory Committee
•Technical Advisory Committee
MPO Adviser Network
9.E.2
Packet Pg. 1032 Attachment: Amended PPP – Clean Version (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
81 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
• Immokalee and Bayshore Community Redevelopment Agencies
• Everglades Coordinating Council
• Bike/Walk Lee County
• Collier County Sheriff’s office
• Lighthouse of Collier
• Conservancy of Southwest Florida
• Naples Pathways Coalition
• Collier Homeless Coalition
• City of Bonita Springs
• Blue Zones Initiative of Southwest Florida
• Community Transportation Safety Team – Collier County
• Florida American Society of Landscape Architects
• South Florida Water Management District
• Golden Gate Estates Area Community Association
• National Alliance for Mental Illness – Naples
• St. Matthews House
• Audubon
• Collier Public Schools
• Arthrex
9.E.2
Packet Pg. 1033 Attachment: Amended PPP – Clean Version (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
82 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
APPENDIX G: PUBLIC COMMENTS
COMMENT RECEIVED
From: Rae Ann Burton <raburton@embarqmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2020 6:23 PM
To: McLaughlinAnne <Anne.McLaughlin@colliercountyfl.gov>
Subject: Re: Additional Revisions to Public Participation Plan Proposed
Dear Ms. McLaughlin,
How can the public provide input in the MPO meetings if there is no public gathering?
There is also no agendas,for this virtual meetings.
I am concerned that there maybe issues that effect the quality of Collier County and the estates, and
that the developers will use this non-public meetings to further their building of the dense Villages in the
Estates and
get rezoning on residential and agricultural properties as there is no public to protest.
I realize that life must go on, but I also fear that issues that concern the Estates Residents will be
approved without the
the residents knowing.
regards - Keep safe.
Rae Ann Burton
MPO RESPONSE
From: "Anne McLaughlin" <Anne.McLaughlin@colliercountyfl.gov>
To: "raburton" <raburton@embarqmail.com>
Cc: "Brandy Otero" <Brandy.Otero@colliercountyfl.gov>
Sent: Thursday, April 9, 2020 10:26:38 AM
Subject: RE: Additional Revisions to Public Participation Plan Proposed
Good Morning Ms. Burton,
Please rest assured that we will keep everyone on our email distribution lists and visitors to the website
informed about how the public can participate in the virtual meetings and will post and distribute
agenda packets following our normal schedule - one week prior to a meeting. We are also making
provisions in draft form for the MPO Board to vote on in June to revisit decisions made during the
pandemic so that members of the public who don’t have ready access to the internet can also
participate.
9.E.2
Packet Pg. 1034 Attachment: Amended PPP – Clean Version (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
83 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
Please don’t hesitate to call or email me or Brandy Otero with any concerns or questions you may have
regarding MPO operations during and after the pandemic.
Regards,
Anne McLaughlin
Executive Director
MS. BURTON’S RESPONSE
Dated 4/9/20
Ms. McLaughlin,
Thank you very much for the information.
Keep Safe
Rae Ann Burton
COMMENT RECEIVED
From: April Olson <AprilO@conservancy.org>
Sent: Friday, May 08, 2020 11:24 AM
To: McLaughlinAnne <Anne.McLaughlin@colliercountyfl.gov>; OteroBrandy
<Brandy.Otero@colliercountyfl.gov>
Subject: Public Participation Plan
Hello Anne and Brandy,
9.E.2
Packet Pg. 1035 Attachment: Amended PPP – Clean Version (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
84 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
I hope all is well with you and the rest of the MPO gang!
I see that you added a list of state and federal agencies to the PPP so those agencies have an
opportunity to participate in the development of the TIP and LRTP. That’s great! I have a few other
suggestions of contacts: FL Division of Forestry, FL Department of Environmental Protection, and Florida
Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. I have seen past comment letters from at least two of
those agencies on proposed road projects. I didn’t see that they were part of the list on page 277 of the
agenda (p. 12 of draft PPP), so I thought I would make that recommendation.
Cheers,
April
April Olson
Senior Environmental Planning Specialist
Conservancy of Southwest Florida
1495 Smith Preserve Way
Naples, FL 34102
(239) 262-0304, Ext 250
MPO RESPONSE
From: McLaughlinAnne <Anne.McLaughlin@colliercountyfl.gov>
Sent: Friday, May 08, 2020 12:13 PM
To: April Olson <AprilO@conservancy.org>
Subject: RE: Public Participation Plan
Thanks April! I’ll check my records, I may have already contacted them and asked if they wanted to
receive regular updates from us. I only included the agencies who responded yes. But I could ask again.
9.E.2
Packet Pg. 1036 Attachment: Amended PPP – Clean Version (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
85 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
Anne McLaughlin
Executive Director
Office: 239-252-5884
Cell: 239-919-4378
2885 South Horseshoe Dr.
Naples, FL 34104
MPO FOLLOW-UP
Sent emails on 5/14 to the FL Division of Forestry, FL Department of Environmental Protection, and
Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. As of 6/2/20, only the Florida Fish and Wildlife
Conservation Commission had responded that they would like to be included on the list to receive email
notifications. They have been added to the MPO’s Adviser Network and duly noted within the PPP on
pages 12 and 92.
9.E.2
Packet Pg. 1037 Attachment: Amended PPP – Clean Version (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
86 | Page
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK
9.E.2
Packet Pg. 1038 Attachment: Amended PPP – Clean Version (12559 : Approve Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendment)
06/12/2020
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Adopt the Pandemic Emergency Provisions and Authorizing Resolution
OBJECTIVE: For the MPO Board to adopt the pandemic emergency provisions and authorizing
resolution.
CONSIDERATIONS: The MPO’s Public Participation Plan (PPP) as amended incorporates
emergency provisions for public involvement that were recommended by the Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA) and Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) during the height of the
COVID-19 pandemic. The emergency provisions are shown in Attachment 2.
The PPP incorporates the MPO Board’s actual immediate/short term response of passing a motion to
authorize the MPO Chair to act on behalf of the Board in order to meet critical deadlines. The PPP’s
intermediate response calls for the MPO Board to adopt a resolution specifying the alternative public
involvement strategies to be used and consideration for holding additional public involvement activities
on plans after adoption and after the emergency is over. The proposed resolution is shown in
Attachment 1.
The language in the authorizing resolution and in the PPP provides references to the Governor’s role in
declaring a State of Emergency and suspending any Florida Statute that requires a quorum to be present
in person or requires a local government body to meet at a specific place and authorizing the use of
communications media technology such as telephonic and video conferencing.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: For the MPO Board to adopt the pandemic emergency provisions and
authorizing resolution.
Prepared By: Anne McLaughlin, MPO Director
ATTACHMENT(S)
1. Resolution 2020-06 (PDF)
2. Exhibits A and B to Resolution 2020-06 (PDF)
9.F
Packet Pg. 1039
06/12/2020
COLLIER COUNTY
Metropolitan Planning Organization
Item Number: 9.F
Doc ID: 12558
Item Summary: Adopt the Pandemic Emergency Provisions and Authorizing Resolution
Meeting Date: 06/12/2020
Prepared by:
Title: – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Karen Intriago
06/03/2020 11:21 AM
Submitted by:
Title: Executive Director - MPO – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Anne McLaughlin
06/03/2020 11:21 AM
Approved By:
Review:
Metropolitan Planning Organization Brandy Otero MPO Analyst Review Completed 06/03/2020 11:54 AM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin MPO Executive Director Review Completed 06/03/2020 12:39 PM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin Meeting Pending 06/12/2020 9:00 AM
9.F
Packet Pg. 1040
9.F.1
Packet Pg. 1041 Attachment: Resolution 2020-06 (12558 : Adopt the Pandemic Emergency Provisions and Authorizing Resolution)
9.F.1
Packet Pg. 1042 Attachment: Resolution 2020-06 (12558 : Adopt the Pandemic Emergency Provisions and Authorizing Resolution)
9.F.1
Packet Pg. 1043 Attachment: Resolution 2020-06 (12558 : Adopt the Pandemic Emergency Provisions and Authorizing Resolution)
9.F.1
Packet Pg. 1044 Attachment: Resolution 2020-06 (12558 : Adopt the Pandemic Emergency Provisions and Authorizing Resolution)
9.F.1
Packet Pg. 1045 Attachment: Resolution 2020-06 (12558 : Adopt the Pandemic Emergency Provisions and Authorizing Resolution)
9.F.1
Packet Pg. 1046 Attachment: Resolution 2020-06 (12558 : Adopt the Pandemic Emergency Provisions and Authorizing Resolution)
9.F.1
Packet Pg. 1047 Attachment: Resolution 2020-06 (12558 : Adopt the Pandemic Emergency Provisions and Authorizing Resolution)
EXHIBIT A: COLLIER MPO PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN - EMERGENCY
PROVISIONS FOR PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT
Public engagement is very important to the MPO, FDOT, FHWA and FTA. In an effort to protect public
health and to comply with instructions, recommendations and Executive Orders issued during a pandemic
or other threat to community health, the MPO will be proactive but flexible in meeting public participation
plan requirements. MPOs are expected to continue to provide opportunities for public involvement
throughout their planning activities. However, some public participation plan activities may be delayed
or deferred and be replaced with other engagement strategies to ensure that all sectors of the population
have an opportunity to participate. The MPO will document any outreach activities that were originally
documented in the PPP or in a PIP for a specific project that require modifications and provide strategies,
if needed, to ensure sufficient and appropriate outreach is maintained.
Immediate/Short Term Response
In the event of a manmade or natural emergency that precludes holding regular public meetings, the MPO
Board may provide staff direction on how to proceed by way of passing a motion. The motion may include
authorizing the MPO Chair to act on behalf of the Board and empower the MPO Director to bring issues
requiring immediate attention forward to the MPO Chair to act upon. The MPO Board will have the
opportunity to ratify all emergency actions taken at a later date.
Intermediate Response
Once the scope of an emergency becomes better defined, the US President, Congress, Governor of the
State of Florida or Local Governing Boards and Councils may issue declarations of emergency and
Executive Orders that MPOs must follow. In the event of a declaration of manmade or natural emergency
that precludes holding regular public meetings for a known or unknown period of time, the MPO Board
will adopt a resolution to:
1. Recognize the emergency situation calling for alternative public involvement strategies
2. Stipulate that the emergency procedures for public involvement are temporary
3. Specify the alternative public involvement strategies to be used, including time periods for public
comment and MPO responses to the comments
4. Ensure that public involvement strategies are inclusive as possible to the extent that they comply
with emergency executive orders to protect public health, etc;
5. if public involvement strategies are not sufficiently inclusive due to public health concern or other
limitations, the MPO may consider holding additional public involvement activities on the plans
after adoption, and after the emergency is over, to ensure that the public is informed and has the
ability to request reconsiderations/amendments to the MPO Board
6. Acknowledge that the resolution is provided as an interim measure and may be modified as new
local, state or national technical assistance and/or guidance is issued
Public involvement strategies include but are not limited to virtual meetings, on-line surveys, telephone
conferencing, social media and interactive components of the MPO website. It is desirable, and may be
feasible, to maintain the public participation plan’s standard methodologies and timeframes for reporting
9.F.2
Packet Pg. 1048 Attachment: Exhibits A and B to Resolution 2020-06 (12558 : Adopt the Pandemic Emergency Provisions and Authorizing Resolution)
and responding to public comments. However, if the time frame must be shortened or the methodologies
are curtailed due to the nature of the emergency, the MPO may take whatever steps are necessary to
meet deadlines. In the event of a public health emergency coinciding with a cyber-attack, public
involvement activities may have to be suspended for a period of time.
Long Term Response
In the event that an emergency situation persists for several months or more and in the absence of action
taken by the federal government to extend the deadlines for delivery of core MPO planning products such
as the LRTP, UPWP, TIP and PPP; the MPO may take whatever action is necessary to meet the federal
deadlines.
After the emergency is over, the MPO will resume its regular meeting schedule and public involvement
activities with the highest priority given to meeting immediate deadlines and the next level of priority
given to providing opportunities for the public to review, comment on and request amendments to any
plans that were adopted during the emergency.
9.F.2
Packet Pg. 1049 Attachment: Exhibits A and B to Resolution 2020-06 (12558 : Adopt the Pandemic Emergency Provisions and Authorizing Resolution)
EXHIBIT B: COLLIER MPO REMOTE PUBLIC MEETING PROTOCOLS
As recognized and authorized by Governor DeSantis’ Executive Order No. 20-69, the COVID-19 pandemic
has created the need to modify procedures for public meetings to enable official public business to be
conducted. These procedures are applicable when a public meeting is conducted utilizing both in-person
and remote participation (hybrid remote public meeting). These procedures may be modified to permit
various options for public participation during meetings and alternative technical solutions.
1. A remote public meeting may be conducted to facilitate the telephonic or remote participation
of members of the MPO Board and advisory committees during the pendency of a declared
emergency such as the COVID-19 pandemic.
2. Committee or Board members in a remote public meeting shall count toward a quorum
requirement as if they were physically present, irrespective of whether any member agency’s
ordinance or resolution requires a physical quorum to be present.
3. A remote public meeting may be conducted for any MPO public meeting.
4. Opportunities for remote public comment will be provided. Information about how to register in-
advance will be included in the public meeting notice and any public outreach information to
include a deadline for registering. Those registering to speak will be provided call-in information
and will be called upon individually during the appropriate public comment period. All comments
must be civil and appropriate in a public context. Violators will be muted.
5. In addition, members of the public may submit comments by email to MPO staff at least 48 hours
prior to the meeting. MPO staff will read the comments into the meeting record, within a time
limit of 3 minutes per commenter.
6. As soon as possible prior to the desired meeting date, Staff considering a hybrid remote public
meeting will:
a. Contact the County Attorney who will review the proposed process to assure all legal
requirements can be met.
b. Coordinate with (1) the County IT to ensure that all technology components for public
comment and remote meeting operations have been provided, as well as any other
audio/video needs.
c. Staff will coordinate with the Chair and other members of the committee or board.
7. Staff will ensure that individuals who will be participating remotely will be given written
instructions on how to participate remotely.
8. MPO staff will facilitate the meeting. To ensure that all individuals have been heard, the Chair of
the meeting should repeatedly ask if there are any other comments/questions. The Chair may
conduct a roll call vote and may want to conduct a roll call for comments to ensure everyone has
the opportunity to speak without speaking over each other.
9. All individuals participating in remote public meetings must identify themselves each time they
speak.
9.F.2
Packet Pg. 1050 Attachment: Exhibits A and B to Resolution 2020-06 (12558 : Adopt the Pandemic Emergency Provisions and Authorizing Resolution)
10. These procedures may be modified by the MPO Board, provided that such modifications are
consistent with law, including the Governor’s Executive Orders.
9.F.2
Packet Pg. 1051 Attachment: Exhibits A and B to Resolution 2020-06 (12558 : Adopt the Pandemic Emergency Provisions and Authorizing Resolution)
06/12/2020
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Adopt the Transportation Performance Management (TPM) Consensus Planning Document and
Authorizing Resolution
OBJECTIVE: For the MPO Board to adopt the TPM Consensus Planning Document and authorizing
resolution.
CONSIDERATIONS: The TPM Consensus Planning Document was cooperatively developed by the
Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) and Florida’s 27 Metropolitan Planning Organizations
(MPOs) through the Florida MPO Advisory Council (MPOAC). The purpose of the document is to
outline the minimum roles of FDOT, the MPOs and the providers of public transportation in the MPO
planning areas to ensure consistency to the maximum extent practicable in satisfying the transportation
performance management requirements promulgated by the United States Department of Transportation
in Title 23 Parts 450,490, 625 and 673 of the Code of Federal Regulations (23 CFR.).
The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) recommends that all the Florida MPOs adopt the TPM
Consensus Planning Document by separate action rather than incorporating it into the Transportation
Improvement Program (TIP) as was previously recommended.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: For the MPO Board to adopt the TPM Consensus Planning
Document and authorizing resolution.
Prepared By: Anne McLaughlin, MPO Director
ATTACHMENT(S)
1. Resolution 2020-09 (PDF)
2. TPM Consensus Planning Agreement (PDF)
9.G
Packet Pg. 1052
06/12/2020
COLLIER COUNTY
Metropolitan Planning Organization
Item Number: 9.G
Doc ID: 12560
Item Summary: Adopt the Transportation Performance Management (TPM) Consensus Planning
Document and Authorizing Resolution
Meeting Date: 06/12/2020
Prepared by:
Title: – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Karen Intriago
06/03/2020 11:28 AM
Submitted by:
Title: Executive Director - MPO – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Anne McLaughlin
06/03/2020 11:28 AM
Approved By:
Review:
Metropolitan Planning Organization Brandy Otero MPO Analyst Review Completed 06/03/2020 11:56 AM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin MPO Executive Director Review Completed 06/03/2020 12:37 PM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin Meeting Pending 06/12/2020 9:00 AM
9.G
Packet Pg. 1053
9.G.1
Packet Pg. 1054 Attachment: Resolution 2020-09 (12560 : Adopt the Transportation Performance Management (TPM) Consensus Planning Document and
9.G.1
Packet Pg. 1055 Attachment: Resolution 2020-09 (12560 : Adopt the Transportation Performance Management (TPM) Consensus Planning Document and
9.G.1
Packet Pg. 1056 Attachment: Resolution 2020-09 (12560 : Adopt the Transportation Performance Management (TPM) Consensus Planning Document and
9.G.1
Packet Pg. 1057 Attachment: Resolution 2020-09 (12560 : Adopt the Transportation Performance Management (TPM) Consensus Planning Document and
9.G.1
Packet Pg. 1058 Attachment: Resolution 2020-09 (12560 : Adopt the Transportation Performance Management (TPM) Consensus Planning Document and
9.G.1
Packet Pg. 1059 Attachment: Resolution 2020-09 (12560 : Adopt the Transportation Performance Management (TPM) Consensus Planning Document and
9.G.1
Packet Pg. 1060 Attachment: Resolution 2020-09 (12560 : Adopt the Transportation Performance Management (TPM) Consensus Planning Document and
9.G.1
Packet Pg. 1061 Attachment: Resolution 2020-09 (12560 : Adopt the Transportation Performance Management (TPM) Consensus Planning Document and
Page 1 of 6
Transportation Performance Measures
Consensus Planning Document
Purpose and Authority
This document has been cooperatively developed by the Florida Department of Transportation
(FDOT) and Florida’s 27 Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) through the Florida
Metropolitan Planning Organization Advisory Council (MPOAC), and, by representation on the
MPO boards and committees, the providers of public transportation in the MPO planning areas.
The purpose of the document is to outline the minimum roles of FDOT, the MPOs, and the
providers of public transportation in the MPO planning areas to ensure consistency to the
maximum extent practicable in satisfying the transportation performance management
requirements promulgated by the United States Department of Transportation in Title 23 Part s
450, 490, 625, and 673 of the Code of Federal Regulations (23 CFR). Specifically:
23 CFR 450.314(h)(1) requires that “The MPO(s), State(s), and providers of public
transportation shall jointly agree upon and develop specific written procedures for
cooperatively developing and sharing information related to transportation performance data,
the selection of performance targets, the reporting of performance targets, the reporting of
performance to be used in tracking progress toward achievement of critical outcomes for the
region of the MPO, and the collection of data for the State asset management plan for the
National Highway System (NHS).”
23 CFR 450.314(h)(2) allows for these provisions to be “Documented in some other means
outside the metropolitan planning agreements as determined cooperatively by the MPO(s),
State(s), and providers of public transportation.”
Section 339.175(11), Florida Statutes creates the MPOAC to “Assist MPOs in carrying out the
urbanized area transportation planning process by serving as the principal forum for collective
policy discussion pursuant to law” and to “Serve as a clearinghouse for review and comment by
MPOs on the Florida Transportation Plan and on other issues required to comply with federal or
state law in carrying out the urbanized transportation planning processes.” The MPOAC
Governing Board membership includes one repre sentative of each MPO in Florida.
This document was developed, adopted, and subsequently update d by joint agreement of the
FDOT Secretary and the MPOAC Governing Board. Each MPO will adopt this document by
incorporation in its annual Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) or by separate board
action as documented in a resolution or meeting minutes , which will serve as documentation of
agreement by the MPO and the provider(s) of public transportation in the MPO planning area to
carry out their roles and r esponsibilities as described in this general document.
9.G.2
Packet Pg. 1062 Attachment: TPM Consensus Planning Agreement (12560 : Adopt the Transportation Performance Management (TPM) Consensus Planning
Page 2 of 6
Roles and Responsibilities
This document describes the general processes through which FDOT, the MPOs, and the
providers of public transportation in MPO planning areas will cooperatively develop and share
information related to transportation performance management.
Email communications will be considered written notice for all portions of this document.
Communication with FDOT related to transportation performance management generally will
occur through the Administrator for Metropolitan Planning in the Office of Policy Planning.
Communications with the MPOAC related to transportation performance management generally
will occur through the Executive Director of the MPOAC.
1. Transportation performance data :
a) FDOT will collect and maintain data, perform calculations of performance metrics and
measures, and provide to each MPO the results of the calculations used to develop
statewide targets for all applicable federally required performance measures. FDOT also
will provide to each MPO the results of calculations for each applicable performance
measure for the MPO planning area, and the county or counties included in the MPO
planning area.12 FDOT and the MPOAC agree to use the National Performance
Management Research Data Set as the source of travel time data and the defined
reporting segments of the Interstate System and non-Interstate National Highway System
for the purposes of calculating the travel time-based measures specified in 23 CFR
490.507, 490.607, and 490.707, as applicable.
b) Each MPO will share with FDOT any locally generated data that pertains to the federally
required performance measures , if applicable, such as any supplemental data the MPO
uses to develop its own targets for any measure.
c) Each provider of public transportation is responsible for collecting performance data in
the MPO planning area for the transit asset management measures as specified in 49 CFR
625.43 and the public transportation safety measures as specified in the National Public
Transportation Safety Plan. The providers of public transportation will provide to FDOT
and the appropriate MPO(s) the transit performance data used to support these measures.
2. Selection of performance targets:
FDOT, the MPOs, and providers of public transportation will select their respective
performance targets in coordination with one another. Selecting targets generally refers to
the processes used to identify, evaluate, and make decisions about potential targets prior to
action to formally establish the targets. Coordination will include as many of the following
opportunities as deemed appropriate for each measure: in-person meetings, webinars,
conferences calls, and email/written communication. Coordination will include timely
1 When an MPO planning area covers portions of more than one state, as in the case of the Florida -Alabama TPO,
FDOT will collect and provide data for the Florida portion of the planning area.
2 If any Florida urbanized area become s nonattainment for the National Ambient Air Quality Standards, FDOT also
will provide appropriate data at the urbanized area level for the specific urbanized area that is designated.
9.G.2
Packet Pg. 1063 Attachment: TPM Consensus Planning Agreement (12560 : Adopt the Transportation Performance Management (TPM) Consensus Planning
Page 3 of 6
sharing of information on proposed targets and opportunities to provide comment prior to
establishing final comments for each measure.
The primary forum for coordination between FDOT and the MPOs on selecting performance
targets and related policy issues is the regular meetings of the MPOAC. The primary forum
for coordination between MPOs and providers of public transportation on selecting transit
performance targets is the TIP development process.
Once targets are selected, each agency will take action to formally establish the targets in its
area of responsibility.
a) FDOT w ill select and establish a statewide target for each applicable federally required
performance measure.
i. To the maximum extent practicable, FDOT will share proposed statewide targets
at the MPOAC meeting scheduled in the calendar quarter prior to the dates
required for establishing the target under federal rule. FDOT will work through
the MPOAC to provide email communication on the proposed targets to the
MPOs not in attendance at this meeting. The MPOAC as a whole, and individua l
MPOs as appropriate, will provide comments to FDOT on the proposed statewide
targets within sixty (60) days of the MPOAC meeting. FDOT will provide an
update to the MPOAC at its subsequent meeting on the final proposed targets,
how the comments received from the MPOAC and any individual MPOs were
considered, and the anticipated date when FDOT will establish final targets.
ii. FDOT will provide written notice to the MPOAC and individual MPOs within
two (2) business days of when FDOT establishes final targets. This notice will
provide the relevant targets and the date FDOT established the targets, which will
begin the 180-day time-period during which each MPO must establish the
corresponding performance targets for its planning area .
b) Each MPO will select and establish a target for each applicable federally required
performance measure. To the extent practicable, MPOs will propose, seek comment on,
and establish their targets through existing processes such as the annual TIP update. For
each performance measure, an MPO will have the option of either3:
i. Choosing to support the statewide target established by FDOT, and providing
documentation (typically in the form of meeting minutes, a letter, a resolution, or
incorporation in a document such as the TIP) to FDOT that the MPO agrees to
plan and program projects so that they contribute toward the accomplishments of
FDOT’s statewide targets for that performance measure .
ii. Choosing to establish its own target, using a quantifiable methodology for its
MPO planning area. If the MPO chooses to establish its own target, the MPO will
coordinate with FDOT and, as applicable, providers of public transportation
regarding the approach used to develop the target and the proposed target prior to
3 When an MPO planning area covers portions of more than one state, as in the case of the Florida -Alabama TPO,
that MPO will be responsible for coordinating with each state DOT in setting and reporting targets and associated
data.
9.G.2
Packet Pg. 1064 Attachment: TPM Consensus Planning Agreement (12560 : Adopt the Transportation Performance Management (TPM) Consensus Planning
Page 4 of 6
establishment of a final target. The MPO will provide FDOT and, as applicable,
providers of public transportation, documentation (typically in the form of
meeting minutes, a letter, a resolution, or incorporation i n a document such as the
TIP) that includes the final targets and the date when the targets were established .
c) The providers of public transportation in MPO planning areas will select and establish
performance targets annually to meet the federal performance management requirements
for transit asset management and transit safety under 49 U.S.C. 5326(c) and 49 U.S.C.
5329(d).
i. The Tier I providers of public transportation will establish performance targets to
meet the federal performance management requirements for transit asset
management. Each Tier I provider will provide written notice to the appropriate
MPO and FDOT when it establishes targets. This notice will provide the final
targets and the date when the targets were established, which will begin the 180-
day period within which the MPO must establish its transit-related performance
targets. MPOs may choose to update their targets when the Tier I provider(s)
updates theirs, or when the MPO amends its long-range transportation plan by
extending the horizon year in accordance with 23 CFR 450.324(c).
ii. FDOT is the sponsor of a Group Transit Asset Management plan for subrecipients
of Section 5311 and 5310 grant funds. The Tier II providers of public
transportation may choose to participa te in FDOT’s group plan or to establish
their own targets. FDOT will notify MPOs and those participating Tier II
providers following of establishment of transit-related targets. Each Tier II
provider will provide written notice to the appropriate MPO and FDOT when it
establishes targets. This notice will provide the final targets and the date the final
targets were established, which will begin the 180-day period within which the
MPO must establish its transit-related performance targets. MPOs may choose to
update their targets when the Tier II provider(s) updates their s, or when the MPO
amends its long-range transportation plan by extending the horizon year in
accordance with 23 CFR 450.324(c).
iii. FDOT will draft and certify a Public Transportation Agency S afety Plan for any
small public transportation providers (defined as those who are recipients or
subrecipients of federal financial assistance under 49 U.S.C. 5307, have one
hundred (100) or fewer vehicles in peak revenue service, and do not operate a rail
fixed guideway public transportation system). FDOT will coordinate with small
public transportation provider s on selecting statewide public transportation safety
performance targets, with the exception of any small operator that notifies FDOT
that it will draft its own plan.
iv. All other public transportation service providers that receive funding under 49
U.S. Code Chapter 53 (excluding sole recipients of sections 5310 and/or 5311
funds) will provide written notice to the appropriate MPO and FDOT when they
establish public transportation safety performance targets. This notice will
provide the final targets and the date the final targets were established, which will
begin the 180-day period within which the MPO must establish its transit safety
9.G.2
Packet Pg. 1065 Attachment: TPM Consensus Planning Agreement (12560 : Adopt the Transportation Performance Management (TPM) Consensus Planning
Page 5 of 6
performance targets. MPOs may choose to update their targets when the
provider(s) updates theirs, or when the MPO amends its long-range transportation
plan by extending the horizon year in accordance with 23 CFR 450.324(c).
v. If the MPO chooses to support the asset management and safety targets
established by the provider of public transportation, the MPO will provide to
FDOT and the provider of public transportation documentation that the MPO
agrees to plan and program MPO projects so that they contribute towa rd
achievement of the statewide or public transportation provider target s. If the
MPO chooses to establish its own targets, the MPO will develop the target in
coordination with FDOT and the providers of public transportation. The MPO
will provide FDOT and the providers of public transportation documentation
(typically in the form of meeting minutes, a letter, a resolution, or incorporation in
a document such as the TIP) that includes the final targets and the date the final
targets were established. In cases where two or more providers operate in an
MPO planning area and establish different targets for a given measure, the MPO
has the options of coordinating with the providers to establish a single target for
the MPO planning area, or establishing a set of targets for the MPO planning area .
3. Reporting performance targets:
a) Reporting targets generally refers to the process used to report targets, progress
achieved in meeting targets, and the linkage between targets and decision making
processes FDOT will report its final statewide performance targets to the Federal
Highway Administration (FHWA) and the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) as
mandated by the federal requirements .
i. FDOT will include in future updates or amendments of the statewide long-range
transportation plan a description of all applicable performance measures and
targets and a system performance report, including progress achieved in meeting
the performance targets, in accordance with 23 CFR 450.216(f).
ii. FDOT will include in future updates or amendments of the statewide
transportation improvement program a discussion of the anticipated effect of the
program toward achieving the state’s performance targets, linking investment
priorities to those performance targets, in accorda nce with 23 CFR 450.218 (q).
iii. FDOT will report targets and performance data for each applicable highway
performance measure to FHWA, in accordance with the reporting timelines and
requirements established by 23 CFR 490; and for each applicable public transit
measure to FTA, in accordance with the reporting timelines and requirements
established by 49 CFR 625 and 40 CFR 673.
b) Each MPO w ill report its final performance targets as mandated by federal requirements
to FDOT. To the extent practicable, MPOs will report final targets through the TIP
update or other existing documents.
i. Each MPO will include in future updates or amendments of its metropolitan long-
range transportation plan a description of all applicable performance measures
9.G.2
Packet Pg. 1066 Attachment: TPM Consensus Planning Agreement (12560 : Adopt the Transportation Performance Management (TPM) Consensus Planning
Page 6 of 6
and targets and a system performance report, including progress achieved by the
MPO in meeting the performance targets, in accordance with 23 CFR
450.324(f)(3-4).
ii. Each MPO will include in future updates or amendments of its TIP a discussion of
the anticipated effect of the TIP toward achieving the applicable performance
targets, linking investment priorities to those performance targets, in accordance
with 23 CFR 450.326(d).
iii. Each MPO will report target-related status information to FDOT upon request to
support FDOT’s reporting requirements to FHWA.
c) Providers of public transportation in MPO planning areas will report all established
transit asset management targets to the FTA National Transit Database (NTD) consistent
with FTA’s deadlines based upon the provider’s fiscal year and in accordance with 49
CFR Parts 625 and 630, and 49 CFR Part 673.
4. Reporting performance to be used in tracking progress toward attainment of performance
targets for the MPO planning area:
a) FDOT w ill report to FHWA or FTA as designated, and share with each MPO and
provider of public transportation, transportation performance for the state showing the
progress being made towards attainment of each target established by FDOT, in a format
to be mutually agreed upon by FDOT and the MPOAC.
b) If an MPO establishes its own targets, the MPO will report to FDOT on an annual basis
transportation performance for the MPO area showing the progress being made towards
attainment of each target established by the MPO, in a format to be mutually agreed upon
by FDOT and the MPOAC. To the extent practicable, MPOs will report progress through
existing processes including, but not limited to, the annual TIP update.
c) Each provider of public transportation will report transit performance annually to the
MPO(s) covering the provider’s service area, showing the progress made toward
attainment of each target establ ished by the provider.
5. Collection of data for the State asset management plans for the National Highway System
(NHS):
a) FDOT will be responsible for collecting bridge and pavement condition data for the State
asset management plan for the NHS. This includes NHS roads that are not on the State
highway system but instead are under the ownership of local jurisdictions, if such roads
exist.
For more information, contact:
Mark Reichert, Administrator for Metropolitan Planning, Office of Policy Planning, Florida
Department of Transportation, 850-414-4901, mark.reichert@dot.state.fl.us
Carl Mikyska, Executive Director, MPOAC, 850-414-4062, carl.mikyska@mpoac.org
9.G.2
Packet Pg. 1067 Attachment: TPM Consensus Planning Agreement (12560 : Adopt the Transportation Performance Management (TPM) Consensus Planning
06/12/2020
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Approve Amendment to MPO Bylaws Increasing Membership on the Bicycle and Pedestrian
Advisory Committee (BPAC) from Eleven (11) to Twelve (12)
OBJECTIVE: To approve an amendment to the MPO Bylaws to increase the membership on the BPAC
from eleven (11) to twelve (12).
CONSIDERATIONS: At the February 14, 2020 meeting, the Board directed staff to prepare an
amendment to the MPO Bylaws to increase the membership to 12 (twelve) on the BPAC in order to
accommodate two new applicants at a time when there was a single vacancy. A third individual
submitted an application for the BPAC on May 4, 2020.
A second vacancy opened up when Mr. Reginald Wilson resigned from the committee on May 12, 2020.
This made it possible to bring both new appointees onto the committee - Ms. Patti Huff and Ms. Kim
Jacob - in time to participate in the meeting on May 19th. The current eleven member BPAC roster is
shown in Attachment 1. The track changes showing the proposed amendment is shown in Attachment
2 and the clean version is shown in Attachment 3.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: At their May 19th meeting, the committee received a briefing
on the Board’s decision to increase the membership from 11 to 12. In the discussion that followed,
committee members expressed differing opinions about the increase. The item was not posted on the
agenda and no formal vote was taken.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: For the Board to approve an amendment to the MPO Bylaws
increasing the BPAC membership from eleven (11) to twelve (12).
Prepared By: Anne McLaughlin, Executive Director
ATTACHMENT(S)
1. Current BPAC Membership Roster (PDF)
2. MPO Bylaws – Track Changes Version (PDF)
3. MPO Bylaws – Clean Version (PDF)
9.H
Packet Pg. 1068
06/12/2020
COLLIER COUNTY
Metropolitan Planning Organization
Item Number: 9.H
Doc ID: 12561
Item Summary: Approve Amendment to MPO Bylaws Increasing Membership on the Bicycle
and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) from Eleven (11) to Twelve (12)
Meeting Date: 06/12/2020
Prepared by:
Title: – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Karen Intriago
06/03/2020 11:33 AM
Submitted by:
Title: Executive Director - MPO – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Anne McLaughlin
06/03/2020 11:33 AM
Approved By:
Review:
Metropolitan Planning Organization Brandy Otero MPO Analyst Review Completed 06/03/2020 7:50 PM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin MPO Executive Director Review Completed 06/04/2020 8:15 AM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin Meeting Pending 06/12/2020 9:00 AM
9.H
Packet Pg. 1069
Bicycle & Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC)Membership as of 5/12/20
Maximum BPAC Membership 11; Current BPAC Members 11; Quorum 6
.
Member
Name Member Address Member Phone Member Email
Date
Joine
d
PAC
Date
Term
Expires
Last Re-
appointed
Date
Joe Bonness
Chair
6830 Sandalwood Lane, Naples,
FL 34109
239-598-1046
Cell: 239-825-4821 IronJoe3@aol.com 6-05 3-31-2022 3-13-20
Anthony
Matonti
Vice-Chair
1057 2nd Ave North, Unit 14
Naples, FL 34102 954-288-7083 Avmatonti@gmail.com
6-18 6-30-2020 n/a
Alan Musico
907 Panama Court #503, Marco
Island 34145 Home: 239-642-9729 flprsup@gmail.com 5-07 3-31-2022 3-13-20
Dayna
Fendrick
1263 Hernando St., Naples, FL
34103 Home: 239-263-4029 Dayna@urbangreenstudio.co
m 4-09 3-31-2022 3-13-20
Dr. Mort
Friedman
2816 Silverleaf Lane, Naples, FL
34105
239-659-1055
239-659-1057 (f) mortmymort@aol.com 2-99 3-31-2022 3-13-20
Andrea
Halman 1372 Lincoln Ct 443-807-8997 Andean09@me.com 6-16 10-31-20 10-31-18
Larry Smith 8171 Bay Colony Dr. #1201
Naples, FL 34108 239-398-6340 engdevelopment@aol.com 5-19 5-31-2021 n/a
David Driapsa
725 103rd Ave. North
Naples, FL 34108 239-591-2321 ddriapsa@naples.net 4-19 4-31-2021 n/a
Susan
Sonnenschein
1277 Solana Rd
Naples, FL 34103 239-269-4114 sonnenscheinsusan@yahoo.c
om 4-19 4-31-2021 n/a
Patty Huff 207 North Storter Ave PO Box 617
Everglades City, FL 34139
Cell: 239-695-2397
Home: 239-719-0020
snookcity@gmail.com
6-20* 6-30-2022 n/a
Kim Jacob 791 91st Ave
Naples, FL 34108 239-339-3185 kimjacobfl01@gmail.com 6-20* 6-30-2022 n/a
9.H.1
Packet Pg. 1070 Attachment: Current BPAC Membership Roster (12561 : Approve Amendment to MPO Bylaws Increasing
9.H.2
Packet Pg. 1071 Attachment: MPO Bylaws – Track Changes Version (12561 : Approve Amendment to MPO Bylaws Increasing Membership on the Bicycle and
9.H.2
Packet Pg. 1072 Attachment: MPO Bylaws – Track Changes Version (12561 : Approve Amendment to MPO Bylaws Increasing Membership on the Bicycle and
9.H.2
Packet Pg. 1073 Attachment: MPO Bylaws – Track Changes Version (12561 : Approve Amendment to MPO Bylaws Increasing Membership on the Bicycle and
9.H.2
Packet Pg. 1074 Attachment: MPO Bylaws – Track Changes Version (12561 : Approve Amendment to MPO Bylaws Increasing Membership on the Bicycle and
9.H.2
Packet Pg. 1075 Attachment: MPO Bylaws – Track Changes Version (12561 : Approve Amendment to MPO Bylaws Increasing Membership on the Bicycle and
9.H.2
Packet Pg. 1076 Attachment: MPO Bylaws – Track Changes Version (12561 : Approve Amendment to MPO Bylaws Increasing Membership on the Bicycle and
9.H.2
Packet Pg. 1077 Attachment: MPO Bylaws – Track Changes Version (12561 : Approve Amendment to MPO Bylaws Increasing Membership on the Bicycle and
9.H.2
Packet Pg. 1078 Attachment: MPO Bylaws – Track Changes Version (12561 : Approve Amendment to MPO Bylaws Increasing Membership on the Bicycle and
9.H.3
Packet Pg. 1079 Attachment: MPO Bylaws – Clean Version (12561 : Approve Amendment to MPO Bylaws Increasing Membership on the Bicycle and Pedestrian
9.H.3
Packet Pg. 1080 Attachment: MPO Bylaws – Clean Version (12561 : Approve Amendment to MPO Bylaws Increasing Membership on the Bicycle and Pedestrian
9.H.3
Packet Pg. 1081 Attachment: MPO Bylaws – Clean Version (12561 : Approve Amendment to MPO Bylaws Increasing Membership on the Bicycle and Pedestrian
9.H.3
Packet Pg. 1082 Attachment: MPO Bylaws – Clean Version (12561 : Approve Amendment to MPO Bylaws Increasing Membership on the Bicycle and Pedestrian
9.H.3
Packet Pg. 1083 Attachment: MPO Bylaws – Clean Version (12561 : Approve Amendment to MPO Bylaws Increasing Membership on the Bicycle and Pedestrian
9.H.3
Packet Pg. 1084 Attachment: MPO Bylaws – Clean Version (12561 : Approve Amendment to MPO Bylaws Increasing Membership on the Bicycle and Pedestrian
9.H.3
Packet Pg. 1085 Attachment: MPO Bylaws – Clean Version (12561 : Approve Amendment to MPO Bylaws Increasing Membership on the Bicycle and Pedestrian
9.H.3
Packet Pg. 1086 Attachment: MPO Bylaws – Clean Version (12561 : Approve Amendment to MPO Bylaws Increasing Membership on the Bicycle and Pedestrian
06/12/2020
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Approval of New Appointment to the Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC)
OBJECTIVE: For the MPO Board to approve a new appointment to the Bicycle and Pedestrian
Advisory Committee (BPAC).
CONSIDERATIONS: There will be one current vacancy on the BPAC, contingent upon the Board
approving the amendment to the MPO Bylaws increasing the membership to twelve members. Staff has
received a single application, submitted by Claudia Keeler on May 4, 2020. Ms. Keeler serves on the
Palm River Homeowners and Civic Association and on the River Oaks Homeowners Association.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: n/a.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the Board review and approve a new appointment to the BPAC.
Prepared by: Anne McLaughlin, MPO Director
ATTACHMENT(S)
1. Claudia Keeler Application (PDF)
9.I
Packet Pg. 1087
06/12/2020
COLLIER COUNTY
Metropolitan Planning Organization
Item Number: 9.I
Doc ID: 12580
Item Summary: Approval of New Appointment to the Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory
Committee (BPAC)
Meeting Date: 06/12/2020
Prepared by:
Title: – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Karen Intriago
06/04/2020 10:29 AM
Submitted by:
Title: Executive Director - MPO – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Anne McLaughlin
06/04/2020 10:29 AM
Approved By:
Review:
Metropolitan Planning Organization Brandy Otero MPO Analyst Review Completed 06/04/2020 10:56 AM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin MPO Executive Director Review Completed 06/04/2020 11:02 AM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin Meeting Pending 06/12/2020 9:00 AM
9.I
Packet Pg. 1088
9.I.1
Packet Pg. 1089 Attachment: Claudia Keeler Application (12580 : Approval of New Appointment to the Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC))
9.I.1
Packet Pg. 1090 Attachment: Claudia Keeler Application (12580 : Approval of New Appointment to the Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC))
9.I.1
Packet Pg. 1091 Attachment: Claudia Keeler Application (12580 : Approval of New Appointment to the Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC))
9.I.1
Packet Pg. 1092 Attachment: Claudia Keeler Application (12580 : Approval of New Appointment to the Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC))
9.I.1
Packet Pg. 1093 Attachment: Claudia Keeler Application (12580 : Approval of New Appointment to the Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC))
06/12/2020
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
FDOT Presentation on Strategic Intermodal System (SIS) 2045 Cost Feasible Plan
OBJECTIVE: For the Board to receive a presentation from FDOT on the SIS 2045 Cost Feasible Plan.
CONSIDERATIONS: FDOT will present on the 2045 SIS Cost Feasible Plan Update. The update
process officially kicked off in January of 2020 and is planned to run through December 2020, with the
final plan being published by the end of the year. The SIS Summary Sheet (Attachment 1) includes a link
to a survey that FDOT will use to help prioritize and give feedback on candidate SIS projects in the draft
plan. A copy of FDOT’s Powerpoint Presentation is provided in Attachment 2.
FDOT provided a similar presentation on the 2045 SIS Cost Feasible Plan Update to the Citizens
Advisory Committee and Technical Advisory Committee at their (virtual) May 18, 2020 meetings.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the Board receive a presentation from FDOT on the SIS 2045
Cost Feasible Plan.
Prepared By: Anne McLaughlin, Executive Director
ATTACHMENT(S)
1. SIS Summary Sheet with Link to Survey (PDF)
2. FDOT Powerpoint Presentation (PPTX)
10.A
Packet Pg. 1094
06/12/2020
COLLIER COUNTY
Metropolitan Planning Organization
Item Number: 10.A
Doc ID: 12562
Item Summary: FDOT Presentation on Strategic Intermodal System (SIS) 2045 Cost Feasible
Plan
Meeting Date: 06/12/2020
Prepared by:
Title: – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Karen Intriago
06/03/2020 11:37 AM
Submitted by:
Title: Executive Director - MPO – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Anne McLaughlin
06/03/2020 11:37 AM
Approved By:
Review:
Metropolitan Planning Organization Brandy Otero MPO Analyst Review Completed 06/03/2020 8:48 PM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin MPO Executive Director Review Completed 06/04/2020 8:26 AM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin Meeting Pending 06/12/2020 9:00 AM
10.A
Packet Pg. 1095
May 11, 2020
TOPIC: Draft 2045 Strategic Intermodal System (SIS) Cost Feasible Plan (CFP)
BACKGROUND:
2045 SIS CFP Update
The purpose of the plan update is to:
• Meet statutory requirement of Chapter 339.64(4)(d), F.S.
• Evaluate the SIS needs while considering future revenues
• Develop a phased financial plan for projects
• Ensure consistency with goals of the Florida Transportation Plan (FTP) and the
objectives of the SIS Policy Plan
The Draft 2045 SIS CFP will reflect:
• Projects advanced into the SIS 10-Year Work Program during the FY19/20 Work
Program Development Cycle
• Projects deferred during the FY19/20 Work Program Development Cycle
• Projects currently remaining in the SIS 2045 CFP
• Projects advanced from the SIS 2045 M ulti-Modal Unfunded Needs Plan
• New projects identified by Executive Management and MPOs as priorities
SCHEDULE:
The update process officially kicked off in January of 2020 and is planned to run through
December of 2020, with the final plan being published by the end of the year.
ACTION REQUESTED:
1. Please participate in the survey linked below to help us prioritize and to provide
feedback on candidate SIS projects in the draft plan.
Link to the Survey
(End Date for the Survey is 6/19/2020)
2. Collier M PO Board’s continued involvement in the 2045 SIS CFP update
process.
10.A.1
Packet Pg. 1096 Attachment: SIS Summary Sheet with Link to Survey (12562 : FDOT Presentation on Strategic Intermodal System (SIS) 2045 Cost Feasible Plan)
Draft SIS 2045 Cost Feasible Plan
June 12th, 2020
Candidate Project Review -Collier MPO
10.A.2
Packet Pg. 1097 Attachment: FDOT Powerpoint Presentation (12562 : FDOT Presentation on Strategic Intermodal System
Outline
•What is the Strategic Intermodal
Sy stem (SIS)
•Purpose of the SIS Cost Feasible Plan
(CFP) Update
•SIS Planning and Programming
Process
•SIS 2045 CFP Update ProcessDistrict 1 SIS
Network
10.A.2
Packet Pg. 1098 Attachment: FDOT Powerpoint Presentation (12562 : FDOT Presentation on Strategic Intermodal System
Strategic Intermodal System (SIS)
•Established in 2003 to enhance Florida’s mobility and economic competitiveness
•A statewide network of high priority transpor tation facilities including Florida’s largest and most significant airpor ts, spacepor ts, seapor ts, freight, passenger rail, and bus terminals, rail corridors, water ways, and highways.
SIS facilities are the primar y means of moving people and freight between Florida’s diverse regions, as well as between Florida and other states and nations.
SIS Objectives
10.A.2
Packet Pg. 1099 Attachment: FDOT Powerpoint Presentation (12562 : FDOT Presentation on Strategic Intermodal System
Purpose of the SIS Cost Feasible Plan
•Meet statutor y requirement of
Chapter 339.64(4)(d), F.S.
•Balance SIS needs with future
revenues
•Develop a phased financial plan for
projects
•Ensure consistency with goals of the
Florida Transpor tation Plan (FTP) and
the objectives of the SIS Policy Plan
FTP Goals
q Provide a safe and secure transpor tation
system for residents, visitors, and businesses
q Agile, resilient, and quality infrastructure
q Efficient and reliable mobility and
connectivity for people and freight
q More transpor tation choices for people and
freight
q Tr anspor tation solutions that support
Florida’s global economic competitiveness
q Tr anspor tation solutions that support
quality places to live, learn, work and play
q Tr anspor tation solutions that enhance
Florida’s environment and conser ve energy
10.A.2
Packet Pg. 1100 Attachment: FDOT Powerpoint Presentation (12562 : FDOT Presentation on Strategic Intermodal System
5
SIS –Planning and Programming Process
(FY 2021 –2045)(FY 2030)
10.A.2
Packet Pg. 1101 Attachment: FDOT Powerpoint Presentation (12562 : FDOT Presentation on Strategic Intermodal System
SIS CFP 2045 Update Process
This update of the 2045 CFP will reflect:
•Projects advanced into the SIS 10-Ye ar Work Program (FY 2021 –FY
2030)during the current Work Program Development Cycle
•Projects deferred during the last Work Program Development Cycle (FY
2020 –FY 2029)
•Re maining projects currently in the SIS 2045 CFP
•Projects advanced from the SIS 2045 Multi-Modal Unfunded Needs Plan
•New projects identified by Executive Management, FDOT Districts and
MPOs as priorities
10.A.2
Packet Pg. 1102 Attachment: FDOT Powerpoint Presentation (12562 : FDOT Presentation on Strategic Intermodal System
SIS CFP 2045 Update Process
Selection of Projects
•Quantitative analysis using planning tools
•Consideration of FTP goals and SIS objectives
•SIS eligibility and designation criteria
•Funding/project cost estimates
•Production schedules
•Continuation of projects (Planning Consistency)
•Sy stem connectivity
•MPO priorities
•Senior Management and executive guidance
Quantitative
Analysis
Production
Schedule
Senior
Management
Guidance
Funding/
Project Costs
10.A.2
Packet Pg. 1103 Attachment: FDOT Powerpoint Presentation (12562 : FDOT Presentation on Strategic Intermodal System
SIS Cost Feasible Plan Update
2020 Jan
CO CFP Cleanup
Jan 7th -Statewide Kickoff
Jan 30th –MPOAC Meeting
Feb
CO CFP Cleanup
Continued &
Review Revenue
Forecast
Mar
District CFP Cleanup
& ROW/CON
LRE Updates
Mar 13th –Legislative
Session Ends
Apr
CO Enter
New Projects
in SIS-PM
May
Draft District
Plan to CO
Jun
CO Review
of District Plan
Jul
CO Sr. Mgmt. Review
Aug
Draft CFP to
Districts
for Review
Aug 30th –LREs Due
for Tentative WP
Sep
Revisions from
Districts Due
Oct
Balancing with
Tentative WP
Oct 30th –MPOAC Meeting
Nov
Final CO Sr.
Mgmt. Review
Tentative 2nd Five Development
Dec
Final Plan
Plan
Complete
MPO Coordination by District SIS Coordinators
MPO Coordination by District SIS Coordinators
Tentative 1st Five Development
Tentative 1st Five Development
Jul 1st –Tentative
WP Adopted
Jul 6th –WP Cycle
Tentatively Opens
MPO Coordination by District SIS Coordinators
10.A.2
Packet Pg. 1104 Attachment: FDOT Powerpoint Presentation (12562 : FDOT Presentation on Strategic Intermodal System
Collier MPO Candidate Projects
#Section From To Improvement
Ty pe
1 I-75 E. of SR 951 Collier/Lee County
Line MGLANE
2 SR 29 I-75 Big Cypress Preserve
Entrance A2-4
3 SR 29 Big Cypress
Preser ve Entrance Sunniland Mine Road A2-4
4 SR 29 Sunniland Mine
Road Oil Well Road A2-4
SR 29 Oil Well Road Sunniland Nursery
Road A2-4
6 SR 29 Sunniland Nursery
Road S. of Agricultural Way A2-4
7 SR 29 S. of Agricultural
Way CR 846 A2-4
8 SR 29 CR 846 N. Of New Market
Road NR
9 SR 29 SR 82 Hendry County Line A2-4
MGLANE –Managed Lanes
A2-4 –Add 2 lanes to build 4 lanes
NR –New Road
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
I
H
10.A.2
Packet Pg. 1105 Attachment: FDOT Powerpoint Presentation (12562 : FDOT Presentation on Strategic Intermodal System
Feedback
(End Date for the Sur vey is 6/19/2020)
Please provide your feedback on SIS 2045 CFP
candidate projects by providing your priorities and
comments using the sur vey link below (Sur vey link is
also included in the agenda package):
Sur ve y Link
10.A.2
Packet Pg. 1106 Attachment: FDOT Powerpoint Presentation (12562 : FDOT Presentation on Strategic Intermodal System
Florida Depar tment of Transpor tation
Lawrence Massey
District 1 SIS Coordinator
(239) 225-1980
Lawrence.Massey@dot.state.fl.us
Victoria Peters, J.D.
District 1 Collier MPO Liaison
(239) 225-1974
Victoria.Peters@dot.state.fl.us
10.A.2
Packet Pg. 1107 Attachment: FDOT Powerpoint Presentation (12562 : FDOT Presentation on Strategic Intermodal System
06/12/2020
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Presentation on 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) Network Scenario Planning
OBJECTIVE: For the Board to receive a presentation on Network Scenario Planning for the 2045
LRTP.
CONSIDERATIONS: Jacobs Engineering, MPO staff, the CAC, TAC and FDOT are deeply engaged in
the process of developing a series of roadway network scenarios for testing using the FDOT-District 1
planning model. Jacobs Engineering will report on the network development process and resulting
“deficiency plots” provided by FDOT, additional scenarios to be tested, and the limitations of the model
which are becoming increasingly evident as the process continues.
Attachment 1 is the Draft White Paper on Scenario Planning for the 2045 LRTP from Jacobs
Engineering. Attachment 2 is FDOT’s deficiency plot for all of District 1. It represents a compilation of
Alternate 2 roadway networks submitted by the MPOs and FDOT’s assumptions for I-75.
The CAC and TAC have committed to holding additional meetings during the months of June and July
and in early August in order to assist in the development of network alternatives which will culminate in a
Cost Feasible network to be presented to the MPO Board in draft form in September 2020.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: MPO staff will report on the input received during the CAC
and TAC virtual meetings scheduled for June 10, 2020. The MPO’s Alternate 3 network is due to FDOT
on June 15, 2020.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the Board receive a presentation on Network Scenario Planning
for the 2045 LRTP.
Prepared By: Anne McLaughlin, MPO Director
ATTACHMENT(S)
1. Draft White Paper on Scenario Planning for the 2045 LRTP, Jacobs Engineering, 6/2/20 (PDF)
2. FDOT District 1 Alternate 2 Deficiency Plot 6/1/2020 (PDF)
10.B
Packet Pg. 1108
06/12/2020
COLLIER COUNTY
Metropolitan Planning Organization
Item Number: 10.B
Doc ID: 12563
Item Summary: Presentation on 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) Network Scenario
Planning
Meeting Date: 06/12/2020
Prepared by:
Title: – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Karen Intriago
06/03/2020 11:41 AM
Submitted by:
Title: Executive Director - MPO – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Anne McLaughlin
06/03/2020 11:41 AM
Approved By:
Review:
Metropolitan Planning Organization Brandy Otero MPO Analyst Review Completed 06/03/2020 8:43 PM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin MPO Executive Director Review Completed 06/04/2020 8:25 AM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin Meeting Pending 06/12/2020 9:00 AM
10.B
Packet Pg. 1109
WHITE PAPER - DRAFT
Collier 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan
Plan Process - Scenario Planning - Draft
PREPARED FOR: Collier MPO
PREPARED BY: Jacobs
DATE: 05/06/2020, revised 06/02/2020
Travel Demand and Forecasting
A major element of the 2045 Plan development is to identify growth patterns so that planners and officials
will know where growth is forecasted to occur. This is helpful in the determination of transportation projects
needed to accommodate that growth. To identify growth patterns, the MPO used Collier County’s Interactive
Growth Model (CIGM) which takes historical growth trends, local zoning and land use policies into
account. The CIGM informed the establishment of the 2015 base year socioeconomic variables and the
geographic distribution of forecasted 2045 variables. The 2015 data was input to the travel demand model
and the resulting traffic assignments were compared to known ground counts to calibrate and validate the
models. Once the model was validated to be able to approximate current conditions, the 2045 forecast data
was used as input to the transportation planning models to estimate capacity needs and project performance
in the future year.
Travel Model Development Process
The FDOT Districtwide Regional Planning Model (D1RPM) is the primary travel forecasting tool for updating
the 2045 Plan. In order to update the D1PRM, several coordination meetings were held with FDOT and Collier
MPO staff on issues related to the model development process and the use of the model for developing the
Needs Plan and the Cost Feasible Plan. Ongoing FDOT coordination efforts include providing additional model
data and input assumptions to FDOT. The next steps in the process include the review of intermediate model
data files provided by FDOT. Also, the traffic demand model and all Plan maps related to the Needs Plan and
the Cost Feasible Plan will be created in a PDF format and a GIS platform. Refer to Attachment 1 for the
D1RPM Development Process chart and tentative schedule (provided by FDOT on 02/24/2020).
Alternative Scenario Development and Testing
Travel models follow a sequence of steps that simulate responses people make about how to travel, given
various possible configurations of highway and transit service. These configurations are effectively
“scenarios” of different travel networks that could exist in Collier County in the year 2045. Travel‐network
alternative scenarios are tested to see how they perform given a hypothetical distribution of people and their
destinations across Collier County in 2045. Before any travel‐network scenarios can be tested, the forecasted
distribution of population, employment, shopping, schools, etc., for the year 2045 must be entered into the
model. This dataset is referred to as socioeconomic (SE) data, which must be provided for each Traffic
Analysis Zone (TAZ). FDOT runs the travel model for all MPOs in District One, but they rely on individual
MPOs to provide forecasted SE data for 2045. The CIGM, prepared for Collier County in 2017 by Metro
Forecasting Models, contributed to the development of the forecasted SE data for 2045 entered into the
travel model.
Travel demand projections will be analyzed using the FDOT D1PRM relative to the performance measures
and targets to determine where service deficiencies occur. Table 1 summarizes the anticipated travel
demand forecasting alternative scenarios that will be conducted by FDOT.
10.B.1
Packet Pg. 1110 Attachment: Draft White Paper on Scenario Planning for the 2045 LRTP, Jacobs Engineering, 6/2/20 (12563 : Presentation on 2045 Long Range
WHITE PAPER - DRAFT
Table 1. Draft Alternative Scenarios for 2045
(to be run by FDOT)
Alternative Description
E+C Network
(FDOT)
Refer to
Attachment 2.
Initial Traffic Demand Model run is primarily to identify deficiencies using:
a) Existing (2019) and Committed (2023) Transportation Network based on the
current MPO Transportation Improvement Program and FDOT Work Program.
b) 2045 SE Data based on BEBR Medium Projections
Alternative 1
(FDOT)
Refer to
Attachment 3.
Alternative 1 will evaluate the adopted 2040 LRTP needs network with 2045 SE Data to
determine the impact of planned long‐range projects on demand; includes:
a) Needs network to relieve highway segments with poor level of service
b) Capacity improvement projects
c) New connectivity projects for parallel relievers
Alternative 2
(FDOT)
Refer to
Attachment 4.
Alternative 2 is similar to Alternative 1 Needs network, designed to test the performance
of a list of proposed needed / financially unconstrained projects; may include:
a) Additional capacity improvement projects (e.g., applying freeway design criteria
to arterials, and overpasses)
b) Innovative intersections projects (e.g., continuous flow intersections)
Per FDOT, grade‐separated intersections (e.g., overpasses, single‐point urban
interchanges, diverging diamond interchanges) are not explicitly coded in the D1RPM
macro traffic forecast model network. Innovative intersection projects will remain on the
Needs Plan and the Cost Feasible Plan, as appropriate.
c) Corridor Improvement Studies recommendations (e.g., Pine Ridge Rd and
Immokalee Rd)
d) Bus Rapid Transit Corridors (e.g., intermodal hubs, express service, park and ride
system) consistent with Congestion Management Process (2017)
Alternative 3
(FDOT)
Final Needs Plan Network ‐ designed to test the performance of a list of proposed
needed / financially unconstrained projects. Transportation scenarios may include:
a) Connected Autonomous Vehicles (CAV) on limited access facilities to maximize
capacity and efficiency.
b) Transportation corridors (e.g., Bus Rapid Transit Corridors, intermodal hubs,
express service, park and ride system) consistent with Congestion Management
Process (2017).
Alternative 4
(FDOT)
Draft Cost Feasible Network ‐ designed to test the performance of a list of proposed
financially constrained projects
Alternative 5
(FDOT) Revised Draft Cost Feasible Network
MPO Final
Alternative (FDOT) Final Cost Feasible Network based on Final SE Data
10.B.1
Packet Pg. 1111 Attachment: Draft White Paper on Scenario Planning for the 2045 LRTP, Jacobs Engineering, 6/2/20 (12563 : Presentation on 2045 Long Range
WHITE PAPER - DRAFT
ATTACHMENT 1
10.B.1
Packet Pg. 1112 Attachment: Draft White Paper on Scenario Planning for the 2045 LRTP, Jacobs Engineering, 6/2/20 (12563 : Presentation on 2045 Long Range
WHITE PAPER - DRAFT
District One 2045 Cost Feasible LRTP Model Development Process and Schedule (2/24/2020)
(Note: As of 5/1/2020, the 2045 Alternative 1 model data files are due from FDOT to MPO on 5/8/2020)
10.B.1
Packet Pg. 1113 Attachment: Draft White Paper on Scenario Planning for the 2045 LRTP, Jacobs Engineering, 6/2/20 (12563 : Presentation on 2045 Long Range
WHITE PAPER - DRAFT
ATTACHMENT 2
10.B.1
Packet Pg. 1114 Attachment: Draft White Paper on Scenario Planning for the 2045 LRTP, Jacobs Engineering, 6/2/20 (12563 : Presentation on 2045 Long Range
Collier MPO Year 2045 LRTPCOLLIER COUNTYBase Year Changes (2010-2015)ID#RoadwayFromToImprovementInterstateExpressways/Toll RoadwaysFederal and State10SR 84 Santa Barbara Blvd Radio Rd Widen from 4 to 6 Lanes 11SR 84Radio RdJayrose PlWiden from 4 to 6 Lanes 12US 41Collier BlvdJoseph Ln Widen from 4 to 6 Lanes 13US 41Joseph LnGreenway RdWiden from 2 to 4 Lanes County14Collier Blvd Golden Gate Main Canal I-75 Widen from 4 to 8 Lanes15Collier Blvd I-75 Davis Blvd Widen from 4 to 8 Lanes16Oil Well Rd Immokalee Rd Everglades Blvd Widen from 2 to 4 Lanes 17Oil Well Rd Oil Well Grade Ave Maria Blvd Widen from 2 to 4 Lanes 18Vanderbilt Beach RdAirport Pulling RdFontana Del Sol WayWiden from 4 to 6 Lanes City of NaplesCity of Marco IslandEverglades CitySources: Collier County AUIR 2010, 2014, 2015, and 2016DRAFT 10-30-1910.B.1Packet Pg. 1115Attachment: Draft White Paper on Scenario Planning for the 2045 LRTP, Jacobs Engineering, 6/2/20
Collier MPO Year 2045 LRTPCOLLIER COUNTYExisting (2015-2019)ID#RoadwayFromToImprovementInterstate19I-75 North of SR 951 Golden Gate Pkwy Widen from 4 to 6 Lanes51I-75Golden Gate Pkwy SB Off Ramp-Interchange ImprovementExpressways/Toll RoadwaysFederal and State53SR 29 Jefferson Ave 9th St Add Turn Lanes54SR 82Corkscrew Rd-Add Turn Lanes20SR 951Manatee RdNorth of Tower RdWiden from 2 to 4 Lanes County708th Street Bridge Bridge55Airport Pulling RdNorth Horseshoe Dr-Intersection Improvements21City Gate Blvd ExtensionWhite Lake BlvdEast of Brennan DrNew 4-Lane Facility22Golden Gate BlvdWilson Blvd20th StWiden from 2 to 4 Lanes 56Golden Gate PkwyLivingston Rd-Intersection Improvements23Logan BlvdNorth of Immokalee RdLee County LineNew 2-Lane Facility24Massey St / Woodcrest DrCalusa Pines DrImmokalee RdNew 2-Lane Facility57Pine Ridge RdUS 41-Intersection Improvements25Pristine DrWolfe RdVanderbilt Beach RdNew 2-Lane Facility26Tree Farm RdDavila StMassey StNew 2-Lane FacilityCity of NaplesCity of Marco IslandEverglades CitySources: FDOT Collier County Five Year Work Program FY 2014‐2019, Collier County AUIR Five Year Work Program FY 2015‐2019, Collier County MPO 2040 LRTPDRAFT 10-30-191410.B.1Packet Pg. 1116Attachment: Draft White Paper on Scenario Planning for the 2045 LRTP, Jacobs Engineering, 6/2/20
Collier MPO Year 2045 LRTPCOLLIER COUNTYCommitted (2019-2023)ID#RoadwayFromToImprovementInterstateExpressways/Toll RoadwaysFederal and State36SR 82Gator Slough LaneSR 29Widen from 2 to 4 Lanes 58US 41Oasis Visitor Center - Add Left Turn LaneCounty7116th Street Bridge 16th St16th StNew Bridge29Airport Pulling Rd*Vanderbilt Beach RdImmokalee RdWiden from 4 to 6 Lanes59Immokalee RdWoodcrest Dr-Intersection Improvements60Pine Ridge Rd*Livingston Rd-Intersection Improvements75Price St*Waterford Dr-Roundabout Implementation61Randall Blvd*Immokalee Rd-Intersection Improvements30Randall BlvdImmokalee Rd8th StWiden from 2 to 4 Lanes 62Triangle Blvd*Celeste Dr-Roundabout Implementation31Vanderbilt Beach RdUS 41East of Goodlette-Frank RdWiden from 4 to 6 Lanes 32Vanderbilt Beach Rd*Collier BlvdGreyhawk TrWiden from 2 to 4 Lanes 37Vanderbilt Beach Rd*Greyhawk TrWilson BlvdNew 4-Lane Facility38Vanderbilt Beach Rd*Wilson Blvd16th StNew 2-Lane Facility33Veterans Memorial BlvdOld US 41Secoya Reserve CirNew 4-Lane Facility34Veterans Memorial BlvdSecoya Reserve CirStrand BlvdWiden from 2 to 4 Lanes 35Whipporwill LanePine Ridge RdStratford LnWiden from 2 to 4 LanesCity of Naples6310th St5th Ave North-Roundabout Implementation643rd Ave South8th St South-Roundabout Implementation67Mooring Line DrCrayton Rd-Roundabout Implementation73Crayton RdHarbour Dr-Roundabout ImplementationCity of Marco IslandEverglades CitySources: FDOT Collier County Five Year Work Program FY 2019‐2023, Collier County AUIR Five Year Work Program FY 2019‐2023, Collier County One‐Cent Sales Surtax Website*Collier One‐Cent Sales Surtax Transportation ProjectDRAFT 10-30-1910.B.1Packet Pg. 1117Attachment: Draft White Paper on Scenario Planning for the 2045 LRTP, Jacobs Engineering, 6/2/20
1716
19
36
37
12
222332382933
31
1034
243525
1121
30
13
18
2075
73
7170
67
6463
62
61
60
59
58
57
5655
54
53
51
Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS,AeroGRID , IGN, and the GIS User Community
E+C Collier 2045 LRTP
¯
GULF OF MEXICO
LEGEN D LIVINGSTON RDCITY O FNAPLES
CITY OFMARCO ISLAND
MONROE CO
LE E C O
H E N D RY C O
1923 322933
31
103 7
34
2435251 1
2 1
26
18
73
67
64
63
60
59
57
56
55
51
53
SR 29
CR-846 E
CR 846SR-29N 15TH STW MAIN STCARSON RDNEW MARKET RD W
846 WImmokalee Inset
Immokalee Inset
Naple s Inset
Naples Inset
CITY OFEVERGLADES CITY 1 inch = 32,000 feet 1 inch = 10,000 feet
1 inch = 8,000 feet
0 64,000 128,00032,000 Feet 0 20,000 40,00010,000 Feet
CITY O FNAPLES
Committed
ExistingBase [2010-2015]
Committed [2019-2023]Existing [2015-2019]InterstatesSANTA BARBARACOLLIER BLVDGOODLETTEUS 41INTERSTATE 75IN TERSTATE 75
IMMOKALEE
IMMOKALEE
OIL WELL ROAD
GOLDEN GATE
SR 84
RADIO
SR 82
0 8,000 16,0004,000 Feet
EVERGLADESCounty RoadsUS Highways Toll Limited Access State Roads TAMIAMI TRL NGOODLETTE-FRANK RD LIVINGSTON RDI-75COLLIER BLVDRATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK RD
DAVIS BLVD SANTA BARBARA BLVDPINE RIDGE RD
VANDERBILT BEACH RD
IMMOKALEE ROAD
COUNTY BARN GOLDEN GATE BLVD
RADIO RD
GOLDEN GATE PKWYUS 4115
14
10.B.1
Packet Pg. 1118 Attachment: Draft White Paper on Scenario Planning for the 2045 LRTP, Jacobs Engineering, 6/2/20 (12563 : Presentation on 2045 Long Range
10.B.1
Packet Pg. 1119 Attachment: Draft White Paper on Scenario Planning for the 2045 LRTP, Jacobs Engineering, 6/2/20 (12563 : Presentation on
WHITE PAPER - DRAFT
ATTACHMENT 3
10.B.1
Packet Pg. 1120 Attachment: Draft White Paper on Scenario Planning for the 2045 LRTP, Jacobs Engineering, 6/2/20 (12563 : Presentation on 2045 Long Range
1 Benfield Road City Gate Boulevard North Lords Way 0 New 2 lane roadway in a 4 lane footprint2 Benfield Road US 41 (SR 90) (Tamiami Trail East Rattlesnake‐Hammock Ext 0 New 2 lane roadway in a 4 lane footprint3Big Cypress Parkway Everglades Blvd north of I‐75 Golden Gate Blvd 0 New 2‐Lane Road (ROW Expandable to 4‐Lanes); east of Desoto Blvd4Big Cypress Parkway Golden Gate Blvd Vanderbilt Beach Road Ext. 0 New 2‐Lane Road (ROW Expandable to 4‐Lanes); east of Desoto Blvd5Big Cypress Parkway Vanderbilt Beach Road Ext. Oil Well Road 0 New 2‐Lane Road (ROW Expandable to 4‐Lanes); east of Desoto Blvd6Big Cypress Parkway Oil Well Road Immokalee Rd 0 New 2‐Lane Road (ROW Expandable to 4‐Lanes); east of Desoto Blvd7Camp Keais Road Immokalee Road Pope John Paul Blvd 22‐Lane Roadway to 4 Lanes with Outside Paved Shoulder (Includes milling and resurfacing of existing pavement)8Camp Keais Road Oil Well Road Pope John Paul Blvd 2 Expand from 2‐Lane Undivided to 4‐Lane Divided Arterial 9CR 951 (Collier Blvd) Golden Gate Canal Green Blvd 44‐Lane Roadway to 6 Lanes with Sidewalk, Bike Lanes, and Curb & Gutter (Includes milling and resurfacing of existing pavement)10 CR 951 Extension Heritage Bay Entrance Lee/Collier County Line 0 New 2‐lane Arterial to Bonita Beach Road 11 Everglades Boulevard Randall Blvd South of Oil Well Road 2 Expand from 2‐Lane Undivided to 4‐Lane Divided Arterial 12 Everglades Boulevard Vanderbilt Bch Rd Ext Randall Blvd 2 Expand from 2‐Lane Undivided to 4‐Lane Divided Arterial 13 Everglades Boulevard Golden Gate Blvd Vanderbilt Bch Rd Ext 2 Expand from 2‐Lane Undivided to 4‐Lane Divided Arterial 14 Everglades Boulevard I‐75 (SR‐93) Golden Gate Blvd 2 Expand from 2‐Lane Undivided to 4‐Lane Divided Arterial 15 Golden Gate Boulevard Everglades Blvd. Desoto Boulevard 2 Expand from 2‐Lane Undivided to 4‐Lane Divided Arterial 16 Golden Gate Boulevard Ext Desoto Boulevard Big Cypress Parkway 0 New 2‐Lane Road17 Goodlette‐Frank Road Vanderbilt Beach Road Immokalee Road 2Expand from 2‐Lane Undivided to 4‐Lane Divided Arterial 18 Green Boulevard Santa Barbara/ Logan Boulevard Sunshine Boulevard 2 Expand from 2‐Lane Undivided to 4‐Lane Divided Collector19 Green Boulevard Ext / 16th Ave SW 23rd St SW Wilson Blvd Ext (Corridor Study) 0 New 2‐Lane Collector (Future Study Area)20 Green Boulevard Ext / 16th Ave SW CR 951 23rd Street SW (Corridor Study) 0 New 4‐Lane Divided Collector (Future Study Area)21 Green Boulevard Ext / 16th Ave SW Wilson Blvd ExtEverglades Boulevard (Corridor Study)0New 2‐Lane Collector ID FACILITY FRON TO# ofExistingLanesPROJECT DESCRIPTIONMAP ID10.B.1Packet Pg. 1121Attachment: Draft White Paper on Scenario Planning for the 2045 LRTP, Jacobs Engineering, 6/2/20
ID FACILITY FRON TO# ofExistingLanesPROJECT DESCRIPTIONMAP ID22 I‐75 (SR‐93) Everglades Blvd 0 New Interchange23 I‐75 (SR‐93) Golden Gate Parkway 0 (New) 2‐Lane Ramp24 I‐75 (SR‐93) Collier Blvd (CR 951) 0 Interchange, Single Point Urban25 I‐75 (SR‐93) Immokalee Rd 0 Intersection Traffic Signalization (DDI proposed)26 I‐75 (SR‐93) Pine Ridge Rd 0 Intersection Traffic Signalization (DDI proposed)27 I‐75 (SR‐93) Vanderbilt Bch Rd 0New Interchange ‐ Partial (to / from the North)28 I‐75 (SR‐93) Collier Blvd (CR 951) SR 29 4 Expand from 4 to 6‐Lane Freeway 29 I‐75 (SR‐93) Managed/ Express (Toll) Lanes Collier Blvd (CR 951) Collier/Lee County Line 6New 4‐Lanes Express (Toll) Lanes with slip‐ramp locations connecting to general purpose lanes TBD30 Immokalee Rd (CR 846) Camp Keais Rd Carver St 22‐Lane Roadway to 4 Lanes with Sidewalks, Bike Lanes, and Curb & Gutter (Includes milling and resurfacing of existing pavement)31 Immokalee Rd (CR 846) SR 29 Airpark Blvd 22‐Lane Roadway to 4 Lanes with Sidewalks, Bike Lanes, and Curb & Gutter (Includes milling and resurfacing of existing pavement)32 Keane Avenue Inez Rd Wilson Blvd. Ext. 0New 2‐Lane Undivided Collector ‐ name change at Inez to Brantley for short way (dirt road) (Future Study Area)33 Little League Rd. Ext. SR‐82 Westclox St. 0 New 2‐lane roadway34 Logan Boulevard Green Boulevard Pine Ridge Road 4Expand from 4‐Lane Divided to 6‐Lane Divided Arterial 35 Logan Boulevard Vanderbilt Beach Road Immokalee Road 2Expand from 2‐Lane Undivided to 4‐Lane Divided Major Collector 36 Logan Boulevard Pine Ridge Road Vanderbilt Beach Road 2 Expand from 2‐Lane Undivided to 4‐Lane Divided Major Collector 37 Oil Well Road / CR 858 Everglades Blvd Oil Well Grade Rd 2 2‐Lane Roadway to 6 Lanes with Outside Paved Shoulders 38 Oil Well Road / CR 858 Ave Maria Entrance Camp Keais Road 2 Expand from 2‐Lane Undivided to 6‐Lane Divided Arterial 39 Old US 41 US 41 (SR 45) Lee/Collier County Line 22‐Lane Roadway to 4 Lanes with Sidewalks, Bike Lanes, and Curb & Gutter (Includes milling and resurfacing of existing pavement)40 Orange Blossom Drive Airport Pulling Road Livingston Road 2Expand from 2‐Lane Undivided to 4‐Lane Divided Major Collector 10.B.1Packet Pg. 1122Attachment: Draft White Paper on Scenario Planning for the 2045 LRTP, Jacobs Engineering, 6/2/20
ID FACILITY FRON TO# ofExistingLanesPROJECT DESCRIPTIONMAP ID41 Randall Blvd at Immokalee Road Immokalee Road 8th St NE 0 Ultimate intersection improvement; widening Randall Blvd to 6 lanes42 Randall Boulevard 8th St NE Everglades Blvd 2 2‐Lane Roadway to 6 Lanes with Outside Paved Shoulder43 Randall Boulevard Everglades Blvd Desoto Blvd 2 2‐Lane Roadway to 4 Lanes with Outside Paved Shoulder44 Randall Boulevard Desoto Blvd Big Cypress Parkway 0 New 4‐Lane Roadway with Outside Paved Shoulder 45 Santa Barbara Boulevard Painted Leaf Lane Green Boulevard 4Expand from 4‐Lane Divided to 6‐Lane Divided Arterial 46 SR 29 North of SR 82 Collier/Hendry Line 22‐Lane Roadway to 4 Lanes with Paved Shoulders (Includes milling and resurfacing of existing pavement)47 SR 29 Oil Well Rd SR 82 22‐Lane Roadway to 4 Lanes with Paved Shoulders (Includes milling and resurfacing of existing pavement)48 SR 29 I‐75 (SR 93) Oil Well Rd 22‐Lane Roadway to 4 Lanes with Paved Shoulders (Includes milling and resurfacing of existing pavement)49 SR 29 9th St Immokalee Rd 2Expand from 2‐Lane Undivided with center turn lane to 4‐Lane Divided Arterial 50 SR 29 New Market Road North North of SR‐82 2 Expand from 2‐Lane Undivided to 4‐Lane Divided Arterial 51 SR 29 Immokalee Rd New Market Road North 2Expand from 2‐Lane Undivided with center turn lane to 4‐Lane Divided Arterial 10.B.1Packet Pg. 1123Attachment: Draft White Paper on Scenario Planning for the 2045 LRTP, Jacobs Engineering, 6/2/20
2New 2 LaneNew 4 Lane4 Lane6 Lane I-75 Managed lanes (Toll)6543 751213148191011151617182019212223242526272830 313233353634373839404142434445505152 53 544648 495556 57 58596061 62 636465Collier MPO 2045 LRTP Alternative 1
Network Draft 4/15/20
Corresponds to
ALT01_COLLIERMPO_Projects2045_DRAFT041520.xlsx
10.B.1
Packet Pg. 1124 Attachment: Draft White Paper on Scenario Planning for the 2045 LRTP, Jacobs
Collier MPO 2045 LRTP
Existing + Committed (E+C) Network Results
Draft 4/23/20
Collier MPO 2045 LRTP
Alternative 1 Network Draft 5/08/20 Results
Refer to 7d Attachment 1 (Sub Attachment 3) in Packet
for List of Projects and Map
10.B.1
Packet Pg. 1125 Attachment: Draft White Paper on Scenario Planning for the 2045 LRTP, Jacobs
WHITE PAPER - DRAFT
ATTACHMENT 4
10.B.1
Packet Pg. 1126 Attachment: Draft White Paper on Scenario Planning for the 2045 LRTP, Jacobs Engineering, 6/2/20 (12563 : Presentation on 2045 Long Range
FDOT Plots AADT/LOSD LOS: Orange = 1.0 to 1.15; Red = 1.15 to 1.50; Black = greater than 1.5NOTES1 Benfield Road Extension US 41 (SR 90) (Tamiami Trail East)City Gate Boulevard North 0 2 2New 2 lane roadway in a 4 lane footprintComment: What is the planned alignment of Benfield Rd? Response: See Attachment 1 for approx. alignment on aerialBenfield is New 2‐lane from US 41 to City Gate Blvd North.Benfield Rd Ext includes overpass over I‐75.Correction: It is continuous ‐ there is no missing segment.9 Collier Blvd (CR 951) Main Golden Gate Canal Green Blvd 4 4 6 Expand to 6 lanesAlt 1 = orange; Alt 2 = 6 lanes10 CR 951 Extension (new)Collier Blvd (CR 951) northern terminusLee/Collier County Line 0 2 2New 2‐lane Arterial to Bonita Beach Road Correction to alignment ‐ see map mark up15 Golden Gate Blvd Everglades Blvd Desoto Blvd 2 4 4 Expand to 4 lanesE = 2 lanesAlt 1 (#15)= 4 lanesAlt 2 = 4 lanes16 Golden Gate Blvd Desoto Blvd Big Cypress Parkway 0 2 2 New 4‐Lane Road E = 0 lanesAlt 1 (#16)= New 2 lanesAlt 2 = 4 lanes22 I‐75 (SR‐93) Interchange (new) Everglades Blvd‐i/c i/c New Full InterchangeE = There is no existing interchangeAlt 1#22 = new interchange; Alt 1 shows high volumes and traffic to/from Naples [32,000 on Everglades; 2600 on ramps; relief for Collier Blvd]Alt 2 = Alt 1Test TBD: What happens without this access? (this is not FDOT alternative)23 I‐75 (SR‐93) Interchange (modified) Golden Gate Parkway (New) 2‐Lane RampAlt 1 = Coded as Existing configurationAlt 2 = (New) 2‐Lane RampGGP@I‐75 Further study required; potential overpass at GGP@Livingston24 I‐75 (SR‐93) Interchange (modified) Collier Blvd (CR 951)Interchange improvements are in designE+C= orange; Alt = yellowCollier Blvd I/C IN DESIGNAlt 1 = Alt 225 I‐75 (SR‐93) Interchange (modified) Immokalee RdReconstruction DDI configuration interchangeAlt 2 = Immokalee / I‐75 code as DDI 26 I‐75 (SR‐93) Interchange (modified) Pine Ridge RdReconstruction DDI configuration interchangeE+C = red; Alt 1 = orange; not coded as DDIAlt 2 = Pine Ridge / I‐75 code as DDI 27 I‐75 (SR‐93) Interchange (new) Vanderbilt Beach Dr‐i/c i/c New Partial interchangeAlt 1 = Alt 2 = PARTIAL i/c included in Alt 1 to/from north41 Randall Blvd Intersection Immokalee RdIntersection ImprovementOverpass ‐ 2 lanes WB Randall to WB Immokalee Alt 1 #41 ‐ error ‐ overpass was omitted.Alt 2: Overpass ‐ 2 lanes WB Randall to WB Immokalee; and Randall Blvd from Immokalee to 8th St. Widen to 6 Lanes51 SR 29/New Market Road W Immokalee Rd New Market Road North 2422‐Lane UndividedCorrection Alt 2: New Market Rd W (SR 29) to remain 2‐lane facility: SR 29 Bypass is in design (4‐lane from CR 846 E to N of New Market Rd N) (417540‐5). SR 29 (New Market Rd W) should be coded 2‐lane for this segment.ALTERNATIVE 2 ‐ DRAFT MAP ID FACILITY FROM TO# ofExistingLanes# ofAlt 1# ofAlt 2PROJECT DESCRIPTIONCOLLIER MPOAlternative 2Page 1 of 35/15/202010.B.1Packet Pg. 1127Attachment: Draft White Paper on Scenario Planning for the 2045 LRTP, Jacobs Engineering, 6/2/20 (12563 : Presentation on 2045 Long Range
FDOT Plots AADT/LOSD LOS: Orange = 1.0 to 1.15; Red = 1.15 to 1.50; Black = greater than 1.5NOTESALTERNATIVE 2 ‐ DRAFT MAP ID FACILITY FROM TO# ofExistingLanes# ofAlt 1# ofAlt 2PROJECT DESCRIPTION56 SR 951 (Collier Blvd) South of Manatee Rd North of Tower Rd 4 6 6 4‐Lane Roadway to 6 Lanes Alt 2 = correction in the limits57 US 41 (SR 90) (Tamiami Trail East) intersection Goodlette Rdat‐grade IntersectionComment Alt1#57: Is US 41@Goodlette Rd Intersection improvement supposed to be an interchange?Response: At‐grade i/s improvement is anticipated; removed from E+C; Study is ongoing. Alt 2 = no improvement64 Wilson Blvd Golden Gate Boulevard Immokalee Rd 244Expand to 4 lanesAlt 1 #64 = red; error ‐ a segment was coded 2 lanesAlt 2 = 4 lanes65 Wilson Blvd Keane Rd Golden Gate Boulevard 2 2 4 Expand to 4 lanesAlt 1 #64 = red; error ‐ a segment was coded 2 lanesAlt 2 = 4 lanes66 Immokalee Rd intersection Livingston RdProposed Overpass (Immokalee over Livingston Rd)Operation improvements are proposed but not coded. Immokalee Study: Overpass @ Livingston, partial displaced LT Logan and Juliette; and DDI@I‐75Alt 2 = Proposed Overpass (Immokalee over Livingston Rd)67 Veterans Memorial Blvd Extension Strand Blvd I‐75 0 0 4 New 4 laneE+C = Alt 1 = Vet Mem Ext + Expanded 4 Lane; Old US 41 to Strand BlAlt 2 = Vet Mem Ext to I‐7568 Big Cypress Parkway intersection (new) Oil Well Grade RdNew at‐grade intersectionAlt 2: New Alignment BCP @ Oil Well Grade Rd ‐ new at grade i/s69 Everglades Blvd Oil Well Rd / CR 858 Immokalee Rd 2 2 4 Expand to 4 laneE+C = red; Alt 1= black (24000, over capacity 17500).Alt 1 = coded 2 lanes on Everglades north of Oil Well Road.Alt 2 = 4 lane from OWR to Immokalee; designated evac route.Correction: connect directly to Oil Well Rd Development; (1) Hyde Park (1800 DU+commercial+government) is on corner of Desoto/Oil Well Road with no access to Everglades; canal blocks access.70 Green Boulevard Extension Everglades Blvd Big Cypress Parkway 0 0 2 New 2 lanesAlt 2 = New Connection71 Golden Gate Blvd 16th Everglades Blvd 4 4 4 4 lanes (under construction)E = 4 lanes (under construction)Alt 1 = 2 lanes (error, should be 4 lanes)Alt 2 = 4 lanes72 Golden Gate Parkway intersection Airport Pulling Road Existing Overpass (GGP over Airport Bl)Correction Existing = GGP over Airport SPUI; should be coded as overpass not at‐grade i/s.73 Immokalee Rd (CR 846) intersection Collier Blvd (CR 951)Proposed Overpass (Immokalee over Collier Blvd)Alt 1 = Coded as at‐grade; 6 lanesAlt 2: Proposed Overpass (Immokalee over Collier Blvd)74 Immokalee Rd (CR 846) intersection Wilson Blvd Proposed Overpass (Immokalee over Wilson Blvd)E+C = red; Alt 1 = orange west of Randall63800 just over capacity for LOS DWilson Intersection Study by County pendingAlt 2: Proposed Overpass (Immokalee over Wilson Blvd)75 I‐75 (SR‐93) Interchange (new) Veterans Memorial Blvd‐‐i/c New Partial interchangeAlt 2 = New Ramps to and from southboundCOLLIER MPOAlternative 2Page 2 of 35/15/202010.B.1Packet Pg. 1128Attachment: Draft White Paper on Scenario Planning for the 2045 LRTP, Jacobs Engineering, 6/2/20 (12563 : Presentation on 2045 Long Range
FDOT Plots AADT/LOSD LOS: Orange = 1.0 to 1.15; Red = 1.15 to 1.50; Black = greater than 1.5NOTESALTERNATIVE 2 ‐ DRAFT MAP ID FACILITY FROM TO# ofExistingLanes# ofAlt 1# ofAlt 2PROJECT DESCRIPTION76 Vanderbilt Drive Immokalee Rd Woods Edge Parkway 2 2 4 Expand to 4 lanesTo Relieve US 41; Widening US 41 Not consistent with comp plan; no ROW noted.77Pine Ridge Rd intersection Livingston RdIntersection ImprovementDisplaced lefts proposed. 78 Golden Gate Parkway intersection Livingston RdOverpass ‐ GGP over Livingston GGP@I‐75 Further study required; potential overpass at GGP@Livingston79 Vanderbilt Beach Road Gulf Pavilion Dr US 41 (SR 90) (Tamiami Trail East) 4 4 4 Constrained to 4 lanesAlt 1: Constrained to 4 lanes; 36000 near intersection; capacity is 29850; Correction: Change access in TAZ to US 41 from shopping center.Shopping Mall and Neighborhood 13K coming out of TAZ80 Vanderbilt Beach Road Goodlette‐Frank Road Airport Pulling Road 446Expand to 6 lanes (in design)Alt 1 = 4 lanes (error, under design for 6 lanes)Alt 2 = Expand to 6 lanes81 Bridge @ 47th Avenue NE West of Everglades Boulevard New Bridge over Canal82Bridge @ Wilson BoulevardSouth of 33rd Avenue NENew Bridge over Canal83 Bridge @ 18th Ave NEbetween Wilson Boulevard N and 8th Street NENew Bridge over Canal84 Bridge @ 18th Ave NEbetween 8th Street NE and 16th Street NENew Bridge over Canal85 Bridge @ 13th Street NWnorth end at proposed Vanderbilt Beach Road ExtensionNew Bridge over CanalPart of VBR Rd Ext86 Bridge @ 16th Street SE South endNew Bridge over Canal87Bridge @ Location TBD ‐ Assume 10th Avenue SEEast of Everglades BlvdNew Bridge over Canal88 Bridge @Wilson Boulevard South, south endNew Bridge over Canal89 Bridge @ 62nd Avenue NE West of 40th Street NENew Bridge over CanalCorrection per Alt 1 (Map ID # is same as Alt 1)New Project to Alt 2 (New Map ID #)COLLIER MPOAlternative 2Page 3 of 35/15/202010.B.1Packet Pg. 1129Attachment: Draft White Paper on Scenario Planning for the 2045 LRTP, Jacobs Engineering, 6/2/20 (12563 : Presentation on 2045 Long Range
2 Lane
4 Lane
6 Lane
I-75 Managed lanes (Toll)
Intersection or Interchange
Roadway Segment/
New Bridge
5
Collier MPO 2045 LRTP Alternative 2
Network Draft 5/15/20
Corresponds to
ALT02_COLLIERMPO_Projects2045_DRAFT051520.xlsx
60
10
22
70
71 Everglades Blvd13thST NWBig Cypress Pkwy15 16
41
64
74
69
68
Collier BlUS 41VBR Rd
Pine R. Rd
GG Pkwy
76
79
67 75
66
72Airport Pulling Rd23
26
27
25
80
xCR9519
65
Keane Av
73
10
24
01
57
77
56
51
8
83
86
84
87
85 16thSt SE81
Wilson Bl8thSt SE89
82
43
78
88
10.B.1
Packet Pg. 1130 Attachment: Draft White Paper on Scenario Planning for the 2045 LRTP, Jacobs
10.B.1
Packet Pg. 1131 Attachment: Draft White Paper on Scenario Planning for the 2045 LRTP, Jacobs Engineering, 6/2/20
FDOT DISTRICT 1 - ALTERNATIVE 2 IMPROVEMENTS (6-1-20)
(Licensed to TRAF-O-DATA CORP)
AADT / LOSD GENERALIZED SERVICE VOLUME = .90 TO 1.0
AADT / LOSD GENERALIZED SERVICE VOLUME = 1.0 TO 1.15
AADT / LOSD GENERALIZED SERVICE VOLUME = 1.15 TO 1.5
AADT / LOSD GENERALIZED SERVICE VOLUME > 1.5
MPO Improvement
FDOT Improvement
Attachment 2
10.B.2
Packet Pg. 1132 Attachment: FDOT District 1 Alternate 2 Deficiency Plot 6/1/2020 (12563 : Presentation on 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) Network Scenario Planning)
06/12/2020
COLLIER COUNTY
Metropolitan Planning Organization
Item Number: 13.A
Item Summary: Next Meeting Date - September 11, 2020 - 9:00 a.m. Board of County
Commissioners Chambers, 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, FL 34112
Meeting Date: 06/12/2020
Prepared by:
Title: – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Karen Intriago
06/03/2020 11:43 AM
Submitted by:
Title: Executive Director - MPO – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Anne McLaughlin
06/03/2020 11:43 AM
Approved By:
Review:
Metropolitan Planning Organization Brandy Otero MPO Analyst Review Completed 06/03/2020 8:41 PM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin MPO Executive Director Review Completed 06/04/2020 8:19 AM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin Meeting Pending 06/12/2020 9:00 AM
13.A
Packet Pg. 1133