Loading...
CCPC Agenda 06/11/2020 Collier County Planning Commission Page 1 Printed 6/3/2020 COLLIER COUNTY Collier County Planning Commission AGENDA Board of County Commission Chambers Collier County Government Center 3299 Tamiami Trail East, 3rd Floor Naples, FL 34112 June 11, 2020 9: 00 AM Mark Strain - Chairman Karen Homiak - Vice-Chair Edwin Fryer - Secretary Patrick Dearborn Karl Fry Paul Shea, Environmental Joseph Schmitt, Environmental Thomas Eastman, Collier County School Board Note: Individual speakers will be limited to 3 minutes on any item. Individuals selected to speak on behalf of an organization or group are encouraged and may be allotted 10 minutes to speak on an item if so recognized by the chairman. Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the CCPC agenda packets must submit said material a minimum of 10 days prior to the respective public hearing. In any case, written materials intended to be considered by the CCPC shall be submitted to the appropriate county staff a minimum of seven days prior to the public hearing. All material used in presentations before the CCPC will become a permanent part of the record and will be available for presentation to the Board of County Commissioners if applicable. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the CCPC will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto, and therefore may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. June 2020 Collier County Planning Commission Page 2 Printed 6/3/2020 1. Pledge of Allegiance 2. Roll Call by Secretary 3. Addenda to the Agenda 4. Planning Commission Absences 5. Approval of Minutes 6. BCC Report - Recaps 7. Chairman's Report 8. Consent Agenda 9. Public Hearings A. Advertised 1. PDI-PL20190000740: A Resolution of the Collier County Planning Commission relating to Petition Number PDI-PL20190000740 for an insubstantial change to Ordinance Number 01-68, the Falling Waters Beach Resort Planned Unit Development, to allow right-out only egress onto U.S. 41, and to allow emergency access only ingress from U.S. 41, and amend the Master Plan to reflect these changes. The subject property is located at the intersection of Collier Boulevard (C.R. 951) and U.S. 41, in Section 3, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: Timothy Finn, AICP, Principal Planner] 2. CPUD-PL20190000683: An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida amending Ordinance Number 14-06, the 7-Foodmart Commercial Planned Unit Development (CPUD), and by amending Ordinance Number 2004-41, the Collier County Land Development Code by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of 1.09 acres of land presently zoned Residential Multi-Family-12 District (RMF-12) within the Santa Barbara Commercial Overlay District to incorporate the parcel into the 7- Foodmart CPUD for a total PUD size of 2.12± acres; and to increase the commercial square footage from 10,000 square feet to 15,000. The subject property is located on the east side of Santa Barbara Boulevard, north of Golden Gate Parkway in Section 21, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida; and by providing an effective date. [Coordinator: Nancy Gundlach, AICP, PLA, Principal Planner] June 2020 Collier County Planning Commission Page 3 Printed 6/3/2020 3. PL20190002862: A Resolution of the Board of Zoning Appeals of Collier County, Florida, relating to Petition Number NUA-PL20190002862, providing for the approval of a nonconforming use alteration pursuant to LDC Section 9.03.03.B. to reduce the eastern side yard setback from 7.5 feet to 5.3 feet for the existing structure and proposed enclosure of the screened-in lanai. The subject property is described as Lot 18, Block 53, Naples Park Unit 4, also described as 851 92nd Avenue North, in Section 33, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: John Kelly, Senior Planner] 4. BDE-PL20190001962 A Resolution of the Collier County Planning Commission relating to BDE-PL20190001962 for a 27 foot boat dock extension over the maximum 20 feet allowed by Section 5.03.06 of the Land Development Code, for a total protrusion of 47 feet, to accommodate a new docking facility with two boat slips including two boat-lifts for the benefit of property described as Lot 8, Block G, Little Hickory Shores, Unit 3 Replat subdivision, also known as 267 3rd Street in Section 5, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. (Companion item VA-PL20190002360) [Coordinator: John Kelly, Senior Planner] 5. VA-PL20190002360 A Resolution of the Board of Zoning Appeals relating to VA- PL20190002360 for a variance from Land Development Code Section 5.03.06 to reduce the minimum side yard riparian setbacks to zero, for the benefit of Lot 8, Block G, Little Hickory Shores, Unit 3 Replat subdivision, also known as 267 3rd Street in Section 5, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. (Companion item to BDE-PL20190001962) [Coordinator: John Kelly, Senior Planner] 6. PL20180001785: A Resolution of the Board of County Commissioners approving a site plan with deviations pursuant to LDC Section 10.02.03.F and seven total deviations, including one deviation from Section 4.06.02.C.4 to reduce the north buffer width; three deviations from Section 5.05.05.E.1 to reduce the landscape buffer width on the eastern property line, allow no undulated berm on the east property line and reduce the tree clustering and spacing to allow the existing trees to remain; one deviation from LDC Section 4.06.02.D.4 to allow the storage structure to remain within the south landscape buffer; and two deviations from Section 5.05.05.B.1 to reduce the setback on the north property line to 25.55 feet and to reduce the setback on the south property line to 16.8 feet; for redevelopment of the convenience gas station project consisting of 1.72± acres located on the west side of Santa Barbara Boulevard, approximately 420 feet north of Radio Road in Section 32, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator, C. James Sabo, AICP] 7. PL20180003708: A Resolution of the Board of County Commissioners proposing amendment to the Collier County Growth Management Plan, Ordinance No. 89-05, as amended, specifically amending the Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan and Map Series to add the Temple Shalom Community Facility Subdistrict to allow development of a church of up to 302 seats, a child care facility for up to 200 children, and on Tract 64 of the Golden Gate Estates Unit 26 Subdivision up to 22,000 square feet of community facility uses, and furthermore recommending transmittal of the amendment to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity. The subject property consisting of 13.5± acres is located at 4630 Pine Ridge Road in Section 15, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: Sue Faulkner, Growth Management Plan Manager] B. Noticed June 2020 Collier County Planning Commission Page 4 Printed 6/3/2020 10. New Business 11. Old Business 12. Public Comment 13. Adjourn 06/11/2020 COLLIER COUNTY Collier County Planning Commission Item Number: 9.A.1 Item Summary: PDI-PL20190000740: A Resolution of the Collier County Planning Commission relating to Petition Number PDI-PL20190000740 for an insubstantial change to Ordinance Number 01- 68, the Falling Waters Beach Resort Planned Unit Development, to allow right-out only egress onto U.S. 41, and to allow emergency access only ingress from U.S. 41, and amend the Master Plan to reflect these changes. The subject property is located at the intersection of Collier Boulevard (C.R. 951) and U.S. 41, in Section 3, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: Timothy Finn, AICP, Principal Planner] Meeting Date: 06/11/2020 Prepared by: Title: – Zoning Name: Tim Finn 03/24/2020 2:41 PM Submitted by: Title: Manager - Planning – Zoning Name: Ray Bellows 03/24/2020 2:41 PM Approved By: Review: Road Maintenance Diane Lynch Additional Reviewer Completed 03/24/2020 3:25 PM Zoning Ray Bellows Review Item Completed 03/24/2020 4:22 PM Growth Management Operations & Regulatory Management Donna Guitard Review Item Completed 04/13/2020 11:11 AM Growth Management Department James C French Review Item Completed 04/17/2020 8:59 PM Zoning Ray Bellows Review Item Completed 04/20/2020 2:45 PM Planning Commission Mark Strain Meeting Pending 06/11/2020 9:00 AM 9.A.1 Packet Pg. 5 C-ovmty TO STAFF REPORT COLLIER COTINTY HEARING EXAMINER FROM:ZONING DIVISION _ ZONING SERVICES SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING DATE: MARCH 19,2020 SUBJECT:PDI-PL20190000740; FALLING WATERS BEACH RESORT PUD OWNER: Falling Waters Beach Resort Master Association, Inc. 6780 Beach Resort Dr Naples, FL 34114 AGENT: Pat Vanasse, AICP RWA, Inc. 6610 Willow Park Dr Naples, FL 34109 REQUESTED ACTION: The petitioner requests that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) approve an insubstantial change to Ordinance Number 01-68, the Falling Waters Beach Resort Planned Unit Development, to allow right-out only egress onto U.S. 47, and to allow emergency access only ingress from U.S.41. The subject property is located at the intersection of Collier Boulevard (C.R. 951) and U.S. 41, in Section 3, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. (see location map on following page) PURPOSE AND DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: In 2001, the property was rezoned from "PIJD" to "PIJD" Planned Unit Development pursuant to Ordinance 0l-68 allowing for a maximum of 73,000 square feet of commercial floor space and a maximum of 45lmulti-family residential dwelling units. On January 2,2020,the petitioner applied for an insubstantial change to the Falling Waters Beach Resort PUD to allow right-out only egress onto U.S. 41, and to allow emergency access only ingress from U.S. 41. The additional "right out" turning movement is requested to improve accessibility options, convenience, and address safety concems from the residents. Due to recent Collier County improvements to Collier Boulevard and increased traffic along that roadway, access onto Collier Boulevard has become more challenging PDI-P120190000740 Falling Waters Beach Resort PUD Revised: March 1 1,2O2O Page 1 of 8 GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: 9.A.1.a Packet Pg. 6 Attachment: Staff Report Falling Waters Beach Resort PDI (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) for the Falling Waters Beach Resort residents and has caused safety concerns for many drivers. The Applicant has discussed this request with FDOT, Collier County Transportation Planning staff and the Greater Naples Fire Rescue District. No parties have any objection to the request and have responded in writing (see attached Pre-Application Notes in Attachment D). Pursuant to these discussions, the existing access to US 47 via Mondago Lane will be modified to meet applicable county requirements and to address access requirements from the Fire District. The existing split iron gate will provide a24-foot-wide access point for emergency vehicles. A sensor in the road will trigger the right section of gate to open, providing egress to U.S. 41 for the residents. Both sections of the gate will open for emergency vehicles. Intentionally blank PDI-PL20190000740 Falling Waters Beach Resort PUD Revised: March 1 1,2020 Page 2 of 8 9.A.1.a Packet Pg. 7 Attachment: Staff Report Falling Waters Beach Resort PDI (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) Ed2olu-EEu,(Jo I'c o o I f >. (90,Z - :E, ofr! tro d t! F c = t alGI PDI-PL20190000740 Falling Walers Beach Resort PUD Revised: March 1 1, 2020 t2iroru= Eg U)o LIJx. 0- o oz u.J IJJF tl .t l'.z- - F o J Page 3 of 8 o-C' o).ccoN o=ID)o- l o$t-ooooo, oN -J(L i-q) -o E =z C .o o(L o-(u c .o C'ooJ9.A.1.aPacket Pg. 8Attachment: Staff Report Falling Waters Beach Resort PDI (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: This section of the staff report identifies the land uses, zoning classifications, and maximum approved densities for properties surrounding boundaries of Falling Waters Beach Resort PUD. North:Developed water management area, with a current zoning designation of Rural Agriculture (A) zoning district. East:Developed water management area, with a current zoning designation of Rural Agriculture (A) zoning district. South:To the west of Mondago Lane, is developed commercial, with current zoning designations of Commercial Intermediate (C-3), General Commercial (C-4), and Heary Commercial (C-5) Zonrng Districts. To the east of Mondago Lane are vacant lands that are zoned Rural Agriculture (A) zoning district. West:Collier Blvd, a six-lane arterial, then developed commercial, with a current zoning designation of Lely Resort PUD (3.5 DU/AC) and is approved for single, multi-family residential units, commercial, recreational, and institutional uses. Aerial(RWA, Inc.) PDI-PL20190000740 Falling Waters Beach Resort PUD Revised:March 11,2020 Page 4 of 8 BEACH RESORT DR z 5uro ROJECT LOCATION o J co TAMIAMITRL E Right Out Only Access Only lngress 9.A.1.a Packet Pg. 9 Attachment: Staff Report Falling Waters Beach Resort PDI (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) Comprehensive Planning: Because this application is not adding uses or increasing the intensity of the previously approved uses in the Falling Waters Beach Resort PUD, it is consistent with the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the GMP. See Attachment A for the complete report from Comprehensive Planning staff. Conservation and Coastal Management Element: Environmental staff has evaluated the proposed changes to the PUD documents and found no issue with consistency. Transportation Elemenf.' Transportation Planning staff has evaluated the proposed changes to the PUD documents and found no issue with consistency. Sections 10.02.13.E.1 and 10.02.13.E.2 of the Land Development Code set forth the criteria by which insubstantial changes to a PUD document are to be reviewed before they can be approved. The criteria and a response to each have been listed as follows: 10.02.13.8.1 a.Is there a proposed change in the boundary of the Planned Unit Development (PUDX No, there is no proposed change in the boundary of the PUD. Is there a proposed increase in the total number of dwelling units or intensity of land use or height of buildings within the development? No, there is no proposed increase in the number of dwelling units or intensity of land use or height of buildings within the development. c.Is there a proposed decrease in preservation, conservation, recreation, or open space areas within the development in excess of five (5) percent of the total acreage previously designated as such, or five (5) acres in area? No, there is no proposed decrease in preservation, conservation, recreation, or open space areas within the development as designated on the approved Master Plan. d.Is there a proposed increase in the size of areas used for non-residential uses, to include institutional, commercial and industrial land uses (excluding preservation, conservation or open space), or a proposed relocation ofnonresidential land uses? There would be no increase to the size of areas used for non-residential uses and no relocation of non-residential uses. e.Is there a substantial increase in the impacts of the development which may include, but are not limited to increases in traffic generationl changes in traffic circulationl or impacts on other public facilities? b PDI-PL20190000740 Falling Waters Beach Resort PUD Revised: March 1 1,2020 Page 5 of 8 STAFF ANALYSIS: 9.A.1.a Packet Pg. 10 Attachment: Staff Report Falling Waters Beach Resort PDI (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) ott' f. h. l. k. PDI-PL20190000740 Falling Waters Beach Resort PUD Revised: March 1 1,2020 No, there are no substantial impacts resulting from this amendment Will the change result in land use activities that generate a higher level of vehicular traffic based upon the Trip Generation Manual published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers? The proposed amendment would not result in land use activities that generate higher levels of vehicular traffic based upon the Trip Generation Manual published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers. Will the change result in a requirement for increased stormwater retention, or otherwise increase stormwater discharge? No, the proposed changes will not impact or increase stormwater retention or increase stormwater discharge. Will the proposed change bring about a relationship to an abutting land use that would be incompatible with an adjacent land use? No. There will be no incompatible relationships with abutting land uses. Are there any modifications to the PUD Master Plan or PUD Document or amendment to a PUD ordinance which is inconsistent with the Future Land Use Element or other elements of the Growth Management Plan or which modification would increase the density of intensity of the permitted land uses? No. Staff from Comprehensive Planning staff determined the proposed changes to the PUD Document would be consistent with the FLUE of the GMP. Both environmental and Transportation Planning staff reviewed this petition, and no changes to the PUD Document are proposed that would be deemed inconsistent with the CCME or the Transportation Element of the GMP. This petition does not propose any increase in density or intensity of the permitted land uses. The proposed change is to a PUD District designated as a Development of Regional Impact (DRI) and approved pursuant to Chapter 380.06, Florida Statues, where such change requires a determination and public hearing by Collier County pursuant to Sec.380.06 (19), F.S. Any change that meets the criterion of Sec.380.06 (19)(e)2., F.S., and any changes to a DRI/PUD Master Plan that clearly do not create a substantial deviation shall be reviewed and approved by Collier County under Section 10.02.13 of the LDC. The project is not a DRI. Are there any modifications to the PUD Master Plan or PUD Document or amendment to a PUD ordinance which impact(s) any consideration deemed to be a substantial modification as described under Section(s) 10.02.13 E.? j. Page 6 of 8 9.A.1.a Packet Pg. 11 Attachment: Staff Report Falling Waters Beach Resort PDI (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) Based upon the analysis provide above, the proposed change is not deemed to be substantial. Section 10.02.13.E.2 Does this petition change the analysis of the findings and criteria used for the original application? No, the proposed changes do not affect the original analysis and findings for the most recent zoning action in Petition PUDA-2001-AR-500. The Executive Summary and original report with findings of fact for that petition is attached as Attachment B. No deviations are being requested as part of this application The applicant conducted aNIM on March 5,2020 at the Falling Waters Beach Resort Club House located at 6780 Beach Resort Drive. The meeting commenced at approximately 5:00 p.m. and ended at 5:72 p.m. The applicant's agent explained the request for the proposed insubstantial change to the PUD. Ken Gallander, the agent, conducted the meeting with introductions of the consultant team and staff, and an overview of the proposed PDI application, including the request to allow right-out only egress onto U.S. 41, and to allow emergency access only ingress from U.S. 41 through explanations and illustrations on easels. Mr. Gallander also explained that this PDI request will be heard at the March 19 , 2020 CCPC meeting. Following the agent's presentation, the meeting was opened to attendees. Issues of concern from the NIM attendees were about the timing of the project construction and potential gate failure as to prevention. These issues were resolved by Mr. Gallander and a resident board member. All attendees showed support for this PDI petition. No commitments were made. A copy ofthe synopsis, sign-in sheet, and easel illustrations, ate included in the Backup Materials in Attachment D. COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW The County Attorney's office reviewed this Staff Report on March 11,2020 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the CCPC approve Petition PDI-PL20190000740 Attachments: CCPC Resolution Comprehensive Planning Review Memo, dated 2-6-20 Executive Summary/Staff Report with findings of fact for PUDA-2001-AR-500 Application/BackuP Materials PDI-PL20190000740 Falling Waters Beach Resort PUD Revised: March 1 1,2020 A) B) c) D) Page 7 of 8 DEVIATION DISCUSSION: NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM): 9.A.1.a Packet Pg. 12 Attachment: Staff Report Falling Waters Beach Resort PDI (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) PREPARED BY: TIMOTHY 9-/l-zo PRTNCIPAL PLANNER DATE 3-(l-zo RA ZONING DIVISION REVIEWED BY: ZONING MANAGER ZONING FRENCH, DEPUry DEPARTMENT HEAD GROWTH MANAGEMNT DEPARTMENT PDI-P120190000740 Falling Waters Beach Resort PUD Revised: March 6, 2020 DATE 3 -t/- ;2 DATE Page 8 of 8 Z*.54@- 9.A.1.a Packet Pg. 13 Attachment: Staff Report Falling Waters Beach Resort PDI (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.b Packet Pg. 14 Attachment: Attachment A - CCPC Resolution (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.b Packet Pg. 15 Attachment: Attachment A - CCPC Resolution (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.bPacket Pg. 16Attachment: Attachment A - CCPC Resolution (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.b Packet Pg. 17 Attachment: Attachment A - CCPC Resolution (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 2800 North Horseshoe Drive · Naples, FL 34104, 239-252-2400 Page - 1 - of 2 Growth Management Department Zoning Division Comprehensive Planning Section MEMORANDUM To: Tim Finn, AICP, Principal Planner Zoning Services Section, Zoning Division From: Sue Faulkner, Principal Planner Zoning Division, Comprehensive Planning Section Date: February 6, 2020 Subject: Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Consistency Review APPLICATION NUMBER: PDI-20190000740 Review 1 APPLICATION NAME: Falling Waters Beach Resort (Mondago Lane) Insignificant Change to Planned Unit Development (PDI) REQUEST: To amend Falling Waters Beach Resort PUD and Master Plan, approved via Ordinance #01- 68, as amended, to convert the Tamiami Trail East (US 41) access point from “emergency access only” to a “emergency only” point of ingress and “right out only” point of egress. LOCATION: The ±74.37-acre Falling Waters Beach Resort PUD property is located on the east side of Collier Blvd. (CR 951), approximately 400 feet north of Tamiami Trail East (US 41), in Sections 3, Township 51 South, Range 26 East. COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING COMMENTS: The subject property, containing approximately ±74.37 acres, is designated Urban, Urban Mixed-Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict; and also a small portion is designated Activity Center #18; and is within the Coastal High Hazard Area (CHHA), as depicted on the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) of the Growth Management Plan. The subject site is zoned PUD. The purpose of the Urban Residential Subdistrict is to provide for higher densities in an area with fewer natural resource constraints and where existing and planned public facilities are concentrated. The subject site is also partially designated Mixed Use Activity Center #18. With these two different designations, Falling Waters Beach Resort PUD was approved via Ordinance #01-68 to allow for a maximum of 451 multi-family dwellings/villas/cluster housing and one office. The Mixed-Use Activity Center concept is designed to concentrate almost all new commercial zoning in locations where traffic impacts can readily be accommodated, to avoid strip and disorganized patterns of commercial development, and to create focal points within the community. Mixed Use Activity Centers are intended to be mixed-use in character. 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 18 Attachment: Attachment B - Comprehensive Planning Review Memo, dated 2-6-20 (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 2800 North Horseshoe Drive · Naples, FL 34104, 239-252-2400 Page 2 of 2 As stated above, Activity Centers are located where traffic impacts can readily be accommodated. U.S. 41 and Collier Blvd. (CR951), the two access roads for Falling Waters Beach Resort PUD, have both been significantly widened and redesigned to accommodate the ever-increasing traffic demand. The increasing traffic on Collier Blvd. has made it increasingly difficult for residents to exit their homes. This is the justification given for the request in this petition. The petition is proposing an amendment to Section V: Development Standards, 5.15 Access to US. 41 that would create a non-emergency, right-out only egress be added to the PUD. The access to US.41 would be via Mondago Lane, which lies to the east of a Falling Waters Beach Resort recreational area (tennis courts). Section IV Multi-Family Residential in Ordinance #01-68 states, “There will be a maximum of 451 dwelling units and one office on site.” This equates to a density of approximately 6.06 dwelling units per gross acre (451 dwelling units /74.37 acres = 6.06 DU/A) today. The acreage decreased slightly over the years since the PUD was first created; however, no increase in density or intens ity is requested with this petition and the density remains consistent with the FLUE. Select FLUE Policies are given below, followed with [bracketed staff analysis]. FLUE Policy 5.6 “New developments shall be compatible with, and complementary to, the surrounding land uses, as set forth in the Land Development Code (Ordinance 04-41, adopted June 22, 2004 and effective October 18, 2004, as amended).” [It is the responsibility of the Zoning and Land Development Review staff, as part of their review of the petition in its entirety, to perform the compatibility analysis.] FLUE Objective 7 and Relevant Policies Due to the minor changes proposed (no changes in permitted uses, densities, or intensities) beyond the currently approved Falling Waters Beach Resort PUD, and because the PUD is essentially built-out, staff is of the opinion that a re-evaluation of FLUE policies under Objective 7 (pertaining to access, interconnections, walkability, etc.) is not necessary. CONCLUSION Based upon the above analysis, staff concludes the proposed Planned Unit Development Amendment may be deemed consistent with the Future Land Use Element (FLUE). PETITION ON CITYVIEW cc: David Weeks, AICP, Growth Management Manager, Comprehensive Planning Section Raymond Bellows, Planning Manager, Zoning Services Section PDI-PL20190000740 Falling Waters Beach Resort R1.docx 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 19 Attachment: Attachment B - Comprehensive Planning Review Memo, dated 2-6-20 (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 20 Attachment: Attachment C - Executive Summary-Staff Report Findings of Fact from PUDA-2001-AR-500 (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 21 Attachment: Attachment C - Executive Summary-Staff Report Findings of Fact from PUDA-2001-AR-500 (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 22 Attachment: Attachment C - Executive Summary-Staff Report Findings of Fact from PUDA-2001-AR-500 (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 23 Attachment: Attachment C - Executive Summary-Staff Report Findings of Fact from PUDA-2001-AR-500 (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 24 Attachment: Attachment C - Executive Summary-Staff Report Findings of Fact from PUDA-2001-AR-500 (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 25 Attachment: Attachment C - Executive Summary-Staff Report Findings of Fact from PUDA-2001-AR-500 (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort 9.A.1.dPacket Pg. 26Attachment: Attachment C - Executive Summary-Staff Report Findings of Fact from PUDA-2001-AR-500 9.A.1.dPacket Pg. 27Attachment: Attachment C - Executive Summary-Staff Report Findings of Fact from PUDA-2001-AR-500 9.A.1.dPacket Pg. 28Attachment: Attachment C - Executive Summary-Staff Report Findings of Fact from PUDA-2001-AR-500 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 29 Attachment: Attachment C - Executive Summary-Staff Report Findings of Fact from PUDA-2001-AR-500 (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 30 Attachment: Attachment C - Executive Summary-Staff Report Findings of Fact from PUDA-2001-AR-500 (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 31 Attachment: Attachment C - Executive Summary-Staff Report Findings of Fact from PUDA-2001-AR-500 (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 32 Attachment: Attachment C - Executive Summary-Staff Report Findings of Fact from PUDA-2001-AR-500 (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 33 Attachment: Attachment C - Executive Summary-Staff Report Findings of Fact from PUDA-2001-AR-500 (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 34 Attachment: Attachment C - Executive Summary-Staff Report Findings of Fact from PUDA-2001-AR-500 (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 35 Attachment: Attachment C - Executive Summary-Staff Report Findings of Fact from PUDA-2001-AR-500 (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 36 Attachment: Attachment C - Executive Summary-Staff Report Findings of Fact from PUDA-2001-AR-500 (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 37 Attachment: Attachment C - Executive Summary-Staff Report Findings of Fact from PUDA-2001-AR-500 (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 38 Attachment: Attachment C - Executive Summary-Staff Report Findings of Fact from PUDA-2001-AR-500 (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 39 Attachment: Attachment C - Executive Summary-Staff Report Findings of Fact from PUDA-2001-AR-500 (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 40 Attachment: Attachment C - Executive Summary-Staff Report Findings of Fact from PUDA-2001-AR-500 (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 41 Attachment: Attachment C - Executive Summary-Staff Report Findings of Fact from PUDA-2001-AR-500 (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 42 Attachment: Attachment C - Executive Summary-Staff Report Findings of Fact from PUDA-2001-AR-500 (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 43 Attachment: Attachment C - Executive Summary-Staff Report Findings of Fact from PUDA-2001-AR-500 (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 44 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 45 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 46 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 47 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) Falling Waters Beach Resort IA 32420000027 32420000043 32420000069 32420000085 32420000108 32420000124 32420000140 32420000166 32420000182 32420000205 32420000221 32420000247 32420000263 32420000289 32420000302 32420000328 32420000344 32420000360 32420000386 32420000409 32420000425 32420000441 32420000467 32420000483 32420000506 32420000522 32420000548 32420000564 32420000580 32420000603 32420000629 32420000645 32420000661 32420000687 32420000700 32420000726 32420000742 32420000768 32420000784 32420000807 32420000823 32420000849 32420000865 32420000881 32420000904 32420000920 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 48 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 32420000946 32420000962 32420000988 32420001000 32420001026 32420001042 32420001068 32420001084 32420001107 32420001123 32420001149 32420001165 32420001181 32420001204 32420001220 32420001246 32420001262 32420001288 32420001301 32420001327 32420001343 32420001369 32420001385 32420001408 32420001424 32420001440 32420001466 32420001482 32420001505 32420001521 32420001547 32420001563 32420001589 32420001602 32420001628 32420001644 32420001660 32420001686 32420001709 32420001725 32420001741 32420001767 32420001783 32420001806 32420001822 32420001848 32420001864 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 49 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 32420001880 32420001903 32420001929 32420001945 32420001961 32420001987 32420002009 32420002025 32420002041 32420002067 32420002083 32420002106 32420002122 Falling Waters Beach Resort IIA 32420003024 32420003040 32420003066 32420003082 32420003105 32420003121 32420003147 32420003163 32420003189 32420003202 32420003228 32420003244 32420003260 32420003286 32420003309 32420003325 32420003341 32420003367 32420003383 32420003406 32420003422 32420003448 32420003464 32420003480 32420003503 32420003529 32420003545 32420003561 32420003587 32420003600 32420003626 32420003642 32420003668 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 50 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 32420003684 32420003707 32420003723 32420003749 32420003765 32420003781 32420003804 32420003820 32420003846 32420003862 32420003888 32420003901 32420003927 32420003943 32420003969 32420003985 32420004007 32420004023 32420004049 32420004065 32420004081 32420004104 32420004120 32420004146 32420004162 32420004188 32420004201 32420004227 32420004243 32420004269 32420004285 32420004308 32420004324 32420004340 32420004366 32420004382 32420004405 32420004421 32420004447 32420004463 32420004489 32420004502 32420004528 32420004544 32420004560 32420004586 32420004609 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 51 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 32420004625 32420004641 32420004667 32420004683 32420004706 32420004722 32420004748 32420004764 32420004780 32420004803 32420004829 32420004845 32420004861 32420004887 32420004900 32420004926 32420004942 32420004968 32420004984 32420005006 32420005022 32420005048 32420005064 32420005080 Falling Waters Beach Resort IIIA 32420005527 32420005543 32420005569 32420005585 32420005608 32420005624 32420005640 32420005666 32420005682 32420005705 32420005721 32420005747 32420005763 32420005789 32420005802 32420005828 32420005844 32420005860 32420005886 32420005909 32420005925 32420005941 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 52 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 32420005967 32420005983 32420006005 32420006021 32420006047 32420006063 32420006089 32420006102 32420006128 32420006144 32420006160 32420006186 32420006209 32420006225 32420006241 32420006267 32420006283 32420006306 32420006322 32420006348 32420006364 32420006380 32420006403 32420006429 32420006445 32420006461 32420006487 32420006500 32420006526 32420006542 32420006568 32420006584 32420006607 32420006623 32420006649 32420006665 32420006681 32420006704 32420006720 32420006746 32420006762 32420006788 32420006801 32420006827 32420006843 32420006869 32420006885 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 53 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 32420006908 32420006924 32420006940 32420006966 32420006982 32420007004 32420007020 32420007046 32420007062 32420007088 32420007101 32420007127 32420007143 32420007169 32420007185 32420007208 32420007224 32420007240 32420007266 32420007282 32420007305 32420007321 32420007347 32420007363 32420007389 32420007402 32420007428 32420007444 32420007460 32420007486 32420007509 32420007525 32420007541 32420007567 32420007583 32420007606 32420007622 32420007648 32420007664 32420007680 32420007703 Falling Waters Beach Resort IVA 32420008029 32420008045 32420008061 32420008087 32420008100 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 54 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 32420008126 32420008142 32420008168 32420008184 32420008207 32420008223 32420008249 32420008265 32420008281 32420008304 32420008320 32420008346 32420008362 32420008388 32420008401 32420008427 32420008443 32420008469 32420008485 32420008508 32420008524 32420008540 32420008566 32420008582 32420008605 32420008621 32420008647 32420008663 32420008689 32420008702 32420008728 32420008744 32420008760 32420008786 32420008809 32420008825 32420008841 32420008867 32420008883 32420008906 32420008922 32420008948 32420008964 32420008980 32420009002 32420009028 32420009044 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 55 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 32420009060 32420009086 32420009109 32420009125 32420009141 32420009167 32420009183 32420009206 32420009222 32420009248 32420009264 32420009280 32420009303 32420009329 32420009345 32420009361 32420009387 32420009400 32420009426 32420009442 32420009468 32420009484 32420009507 32420009523 32420009549 32420009565 32420009581 32420009604 32420009620 32420009646 32420009662 32420009688 32420009701 32420009727 32420009743 32420009769 32420009785 32420009808 32420009824 32420009840 32420009866 32420009882 32420009905 32420009921 32420009947 32420009963 32420009989 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 56 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 32420010004 32420010020 32420010046 32420010062 32420010088 32420010101 32420010127 32420010143 32420010169 32420010185 32420010208 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 57 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) BEACH RESORT DR COLLIER BLVDTAMIAMI TRL E KOINONIA DRPRICE STGEMMER RDDELANO STSCALE: RGE:TWP:SEC: DATE: TITLE: CLIENT: DRAWN BY: DESIGNED BY: PROJECT SHEET FILE NUMBER:NUMBER:NUMBER:OF 6610 Willow Park Drive, Suite 200 | Naples, Florida 34109 (239) 597-0575 FAX: (239) 597-0578 www.consult-rwa.com Florida Certificates of Authorization EB 7663 LB 6952 December 30, 2019 12:56 PM K:\2019\190148.00.P0 Falling Waters Beach Resort PDI\00 PDI\CAD\1901480000 FALLING WATERS PDI.dwg FALLING WATERS BEACH RESORT MASTER ASSOCIATION INC. PUD MASTER PLAN PDI JAN. 2020 N/A N/A N/A XX XX XX 190148.00.00 2 2 190148.00.00 PROJECT LOCATION 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 58 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) Page 1 6610 Willow Park Drive Suite 200 Naples, FL 34109 | (239) 597-0575 | Fax (239) 597-0578 www.consult-rwa.com K:\2019\190148.00.00 Falling Waters Beach Resort\002 Rezone Amendment Application Preparation\Final Docs for Review\Project Narrative & Detail of Request.docx Falling Waters Beach Resort PUD – PL# 20190000740 Insubstantial Change to a PUD Project Narrative & Detail of Request Project Narrative The Falling Waters Beach Resort PUD was approved in 2001 via Ordinance 01-68. This PUD contained two access points – one along CR 951 and a second “emergency access only” along US 41. The Falling Waters Beach Resort Master Association (FWBRA) is requesting a change the PUD in order to convert the US 41 access point from “emergency access only” to a “emergency only” point of ingress and “right out only” point of egress. The additional “right out” turning movement is requested to improve accessibility options, convenience, and address safety concerns from the residents. Due to recent Collier County improvements to Collier Boulevard and increased background traffic along that roadway, access onto Collier Boulevard has become more challenging for FWBR residents and has caused safety concerns for many drivers. The Applicant has discussed this request with FDOT, Collier County Transportation Planning staff and the Greater Naples Fire Rescue District. No parties have any objection to the request and have responded in writing (see attached Pre-Application Notes). Pursuant to these discussions, the existing access to US 41 via Mondago Lane will be modified to meet applicable county requirement and to address access requirements from the Fire District. It is our understanding that any needed improvements can be conditioned as part of this approval and permitted through Collier County and FDOT. The existing split iron gate will provide a 24-foot-wide access point for emergency vehicles. A sensor in the road will trigger the right section of gate to open, providing egress to U.S. 41 for the residents. Both sections of the gate will open for emergency vehicles. Lastly, it should be noted that other than the modification to the US 41 access point, no other changes to this PUD are requested. 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 59 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) Page 2 6610 Willow Park Drive Suite 200 Naples, FL 34109 | (239) 597-0575 | Fax (239) 597-0578 www.consult-rwa.com Detail of Request On a separate sheet, attached to the application, describe the insubstantial change request. Identify how the request does not meet the PUD substantial change criteria established in LDC subsection 10.02.13 E.1. Insubstantial Change Criteria LDC Subsection 10.02.13 E.1 E. Changes and amendments. There are three types of changes to a PUD Ordinance: Substantial, Insubstantial, and Minor. Language changes to a previously approved PUD document shall require the same procedure as for amending the official zoning atlas, except for the removal of a commitment for payment towards affordable housing which is considered to be a minor change as described in Section 10.02.13 E.3.c. 1.Substantial changes. Any substantial change(s) to an approved PUD Ordinance shall require the review and recommendation of the Planning Commission and approval by the Board of County Commissioners as a PUD amendment prior to implementation. Applicants shall be required to submit and process a new application complete with pertinent supporting data, as set forth in sections 10.02.13 A and B. For the purpose of this section, a substantial change shall be deemed to exist where: a.There is a proposed change in the boundary of the PUD; or No b.There is a proposed increase in the total number of dwelling units or intensity of land use or height of buildings within the development; No c.There is a proposed decrease in preservation, conservation, recreation or open space areas within the development not to exceed 5 percent of the total acreage previously designated as such, or 5 acres in area; No change in preserve, conservation,recreation or open space results from this amendment. d.There is a proposed increase in the size of areas used for nonresidential uses, to include institutional, commercial and industrial land uses (excluding preservation, conservation or open spaces), or a proposed relocation of nonresidential land uses; No increase in non-residential uses or areas for non-residential uses are proposed. e.There is a substantial increase in the impacts of the development which may include, but are not limited to, increases in traffic generation; changes in traffic circulation; or impacts on other public facilities; No additional traffic or public facility impacts will result from the request regarding the proposed change. The allowed density and intensity will not change and will therefore not impact traffic generation. As for traffic circulation, the modified access to US 41 was discussed with both FDOT 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 60 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) Page 3 6610 Willow Park Drive Suite 200 Naples, FL 34109 | (239) 597-0575 | Fax (239) 597-0578 www.consult-rwa.com and Collier County Transportation staff and it was concluded that US 41 has plenty of capacity and that the proposed change will have no impacts to the adjacent roadway system. f.The change will result in land use activities that generate a higher level of vehicular traffic based upon the Trip Generation Manual published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers; No additional density or intensity is being proposed; therefore, there are no additional traffic impacts. g.The change will result in a requirement for increased stormwater retention, or will otherwise increase stormwater discharges; The proposed change will not affect the existing water management system. Compliance with FLUE Policies 7.1 - 7.3 Policy 7.1: The County shall encourage developers and property owners to connect their properties to fronting collector and arterial roads, except where no such connection can be made without violating intersection spacing requirements of the Land Development Code. The access points to for this community are already existing and consistent with spacing requirements. The proposed change to the US 41 access point will not effect its location along US 41 and will not affect consistency with LDC requirements. Policy 7.2: The County shall encourage internal accesses or loop roads in an effort to help reduce vehicle congestion on nearby collector and arterial roads and minimize the need for traffic signals. The existing Falling Watters Beach Resort Drive is a private road that encircles the entire residential community of 430 condominiums. The shared roadway also provides access to the commercial use (self-storage business) that fronts 951 and abuts the residential component of this PUD. Policy 7.3: All new and existing developments shall be encouraged to connect their local streets and/or interconnection points with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless of land use type. The interconnection of local streets between developments is also addressed in Policy 9.3 of the Transportation Element. Falling Waters Beach Resort is a 20-year-old community with no adjoining residential neighborhoods. It was built prior to adjacent commercial development. The project’s overall design including roadways and access points does not allow for connection to adjacent developments. 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 61 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 62 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 63 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 64 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 65 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 66 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 67 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 68 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 69 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 70 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 71 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 72 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 73 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 74 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 75 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 76 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 77 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 78 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 79 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 80 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 81 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 82 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 83 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 84 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 85 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 86 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 87 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 88 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 89 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 90 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 91 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 92 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 93 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 94 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 95 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 96 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.ePacket Pg. 97Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 98 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 99 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 100 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 101 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 102 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 103 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 104 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 105 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 106 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 107 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 108 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 109 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 110 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 111 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 112 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 113 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 114 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) Falling Waters Beach Resort, Inc. Master Board of Directors Meeting Minutes Wednesday March 20, 2019 The Board of Directors Meeting of Falling Waters Beach Resort, Inc. (“Association”) was held on Wednesday March 20, 2019 at Falling Waters Beach Resort Clubhouse, Naples, FL. Board Members Present: 1. Frank Ferraiuolo, President 2. Greg Abbott, Vice President 3. Tom Carter, Treasurer 4. Jim Salerno, Secretary Board Members Absent: Representatives of the commercial property owner. Also Present: Bill Covitz, Paramont Property Management, LLC Ray Bibik, Assistant Treasurer Tom Campbell, Assistant Secretary Call to Order: Frank Ferraiuolo called the meeting to order at 9:05 AM. Proof of Notice: Frank acknowledged that notice was mailed and posted in accordance with Florida Statues. Determination of a Quorum: Frank acknowledged that with 4 Board Members present, there was a quorum. Frank reported that representatives of the commercial property owner were unable to attend this meeting. Reports: Frank introduced our new property manager for the Master, Bill Covitz, from Paramont Property Management. Bill Covitz is currently the property manager for Phase I, and will now also be the property manager for Phases II and IV. Bill announced that he will be on-site on a regular basis and can be reached at their Naples office by phone, 239-734- 3201, and by email. Further details are attached to these minutes and posted on the Phase bulletin boards. Minutes Tom Campbell read the minutes of the November 27, 2018 Master Board Meeting. The minutes were approved as read by a vote of 4 to 0. Tom then read the minutes of the November 27, 2018 Master Amenities Board Meeting. After one correction concerning the number of old chairs and recliners at the pool, the minutes were approved by a vote of 4 to 0. 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 115 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) Tom then read the minutes of the January 15, 2019 Master Organizational Meeting. After one correction stating that Jim Salerno was elected as Secretary of the Master Board, the minutes were approved 4 to 0. Financial report for Entertainment and Amenities Maureen Carmiello gave the reports for both committees. For the Amenities Committee, income exceeded expenses by approximately $500 for the various events. Plans for this summer include professionally cleaning the clubhouse floor and purchasing new window draperies. For the Entertainment Committee, expenses for 2018 and 2019 currently exceed income by approximately $2,000. Maureen and Pattie will meet with the Board to discuss future plans. Maureen and Frank thanked all who helped and supported the many fun events, as well as the upgrades to the TV, sound and Bingo systems. Old Business: 1. Front gate entry pad Frank reported that we have contracted to replace the current entry pad with a new system that hopefully will end the “shocking” which we get now. All the current codes should still work. 2. Replacement of doors at gatehouse Frank stated that our new property manager, Bill Civitz, is working on it to safeguard the equipment inside. 3. Curb and paving repair Greg reported that we have contracted for repairs which will begin in late May. They will expand the current turn are by 2 feet and sealcoat the entry way at a total cost of $15,000. We are also getting an estimate for sealcoating the entire perimeter road sometime in the next year or two. 4. Plantings improvement at Clubhouse, Island, and Front Gate Greg reported that the Board will also investigate some new plantings in the front gate area, in addition to some that CLA has already completed. Also, the current method of power washing the pool deck with a chorine is having a negative effect on some of the plantings. A reduction in the amount of chorine should solve that. Frank stated that the we have $8,000 interest money in our reserves that could be used for entrance way improvements. Frank moved and Greg seconded that the $8,000 in interest reserves be moved to front gate entry improvements. The motion was approved by a vote of 4 to 0. New Business: 1. Mondago Lane Access Bonnie Carter reported that she talked with transportation officials at FDOT and met with Collier County Chief Engineer of Transportation Operations about modify the emergency access on Mondago Lane to include a R out to US 41. FDOT and CC DOT officials stated they had no objections to include R out 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 116 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) access to Route 41. Bonnie explained the process for going ahead to get County approval through a PDI which is an insubstantial PUD amendment. She was waiting to meet with Greater Naples Fire Rescue to ensure their emergency access would not be hindered by the R out swing of the egress gate. Bonnie’s full report is attached. Frank moved to approve to start the process ASAP and to approve the CC application fee of $3150. Tom Carter seconded. The motion was approved 4 to 0. 2. Report on Mandago Lane Property Bonnie reported that the parcels east of Mandago Lane are no longer listed, but that the owner is willing to consider a Purchase offer from FWBR. The two lots have been appraised at $200,000 each. Bonnie’s full report is attached. Frank and Bonnie mentioned some of the ways that future owners would benefit by purchasing the property. Frank recommended that if we go ahead, the purchase should be handled thru the Amenities since the commercial property owners would not be involved. He also noted that the mortgage on the current amenities could be extended with the reduction in the monthly payments being used to buy this property at little or no additional cost to current condo owners. He mentioned the possibility of a $1,000 new purchaser fee being reconsidered. 3. Clubhouse Sign improvements Frank mentioned that the new signs will be here soon? 4. Pool Improvements to Chairs, Lounges and Umbrellas Greg recommended that we investigate buying inserts for the existing umbrellas at a significant cost saving. 5. Report on new storage building Frank reported on the County meeting held on Thursday, February 21,2019. A presentation was made by the buyers. During the presentation the Committee members asked many well-informed questions and gave some suggestions. Frank spoke for FWBR and expressed our concerns which were favorably addressed by the buyer and the Committee. After several amendments were made to the petition addressing those concerns, the petition was approved. We were assured by the Committee that the County the would monitor the implantation. 6. Pool Disability access Frank and Greg explained that a disability gate recommendation has been delayed do to regulations and concerns involved in providing disability access. 7. Speaker Diana Fiala, County Commissioner Frank introduced County Commissioner Diana Fiala and Chief Engineer of Traffic Operations at Collier County DOT, Tony Khawaja Tony conducted a discussion with the FWBR owners present about the traffic concerns that both he and we have around the intersection of SR 951 & US 41. 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 117 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) These included concerns about entrance and exit to and from Beach Resort Boulevard and Triangle Lane, U-turns onto SR 951, and the congestion from Triangle to & across US 41. Also included were concerns about speed limits and signs. Diana Fiala assured us that she would follow up on our many suggestions and concerns. Adjournment Upon motion duly made and seconded, the board voted unanimously to adjourn. Respectfully, Submitted, Tom Campbell, Assistant Secretary 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 118 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 119 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 120 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 121 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 122 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 123 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 5629 STRAND BLVD. SUITE 412 NAPLES, FL 34110 Current Principal Place of Business: Current Mailing Address: 5629 STRAND BLVD SUITE 412 NAPLES, FL 34110 US Entity Name: FALLING WATERS BEACH RESORT MASTER ASSOCIATION, INC. DOCUMENT# N96000002184 FEI Number: 65-0696348 Certificate of Status Desired: Name and Address of Current Registered Agent: PARAMONT PROPERTY MGT. 5629 STRAND BLVD. SUITE 412 NAPLES, FL 34110 US The above named entity submits this statement for the purpose of changing its registered office or registered agent, or both, in the State of Florida. SIGNATURE: Electronic Signature of Registered Agent Date Officer/Director Detail : I hereby certify that the information indicated on this report or supplemental report is true and accurate and that my electronic signature shall have the same legal effect as if made under oath; that I am an officer or director of the corporation or the receiver or trustee empowered to execute this report as required by Chapter 617, Florida Statutes; and that my name appears above, or on an attachment with all other like empowered. SIGNATURE: ROBERT SMEDLEY FILED Mar 21, 2019 Secretary of State 0754757165CC FRANK FERRAIUOLO PRESIDENT 03/21/2019 2019 FLORIDA NOT FOR PROFIT CORPORATION AMENDED ANNUAL REPORT No 03/21/2019 Title PRESIDENT, DIRECTOR Name FERRAIUOLO, FRANK Address 5629 STRAND BLVD SUITE 412 City-State-Zip:NAPLES FL 34110 Title DIRECTOR, SECRETARY Name SALERNO, JIM Address 5629 STRAND BLVD SUITE 412 City-State-Zip:NAPLES FL 34110 Title DIRECTOR, VP Name ABBOTT, GREG Address 5629 STRAND BLVD SUITE 412 City-State-Zip:NAPLES FL 34110 Title DIRECTOR, TREASURER Name CARTER, TOM Address 5629 STRAND BLVD. SUITE 412 City-State-Zip:NAPLES FL 34110 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 124 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) Electronic Signature of Signing Officer/Director Detail Date 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 125 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) Department of State / Division of Corporations / Search Records / Detail By Document Number / Document Number FEI/EIN Number Date Filed State Status Detail by Entity Name Florida Not For Profit Corporation FALLING WATERS BEACH RESORT MASTER ASSOCIATION, INC. Filing Information N96000002184 65-0696348 04/18/1996 FL ACTIVE Principal Address 5629 Strand Blvd. Suite 412 Naples, FL 34110 Changed: 03/06/2019 Mailing Address 5629 Strand Blvd Suite 412 Naples, FL 34110 Changed: 03/06/2019 Registered Agent Name & Address Paramont Property Mgt. 5629 Strand Blvd. Suite 412 Naples, FL 34110 Name Changed: 03/06/2019 Address Changed: 03/06/2019 Officer/Director Detail Name & Address Title President, Director FERRAIUOLO, FRANK 5629 Strand Blvd Suite 412 Naples, FL 34110 D C Florida Department of State 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 126 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) ap es,3 0 Title Director, VP Abbott, Greg 5629 Strand Blvd Suite 412 Naples, FL 34110 Title Director, Secretary Salerno, Jim 5629 Strand Blvd Suite 412 Naples, FL 34110 Title Director, Treasurer Carter, Tom 5629 Strand Blvd. Suite 412 Naples, FL 34110 Annual Reports Report Year Filed Date 2018 03/13/2018 2019 03/06/2019 2019 03/21/2019 Document Images 03/21/2019 -- AMENDED ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 03/06/2019 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 03/13/2018 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 04/12/2017 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 03/12/2016 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 04/23/2015 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 04/30/2014 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 05/23/2013 -- AMENDED ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 04/24/2013 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 06/13/2012 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 04/29/2012 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 04/27/2011 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 05/04/2010 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 09/25/2009 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 04/17/2009 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 04/04/2008 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 03/28/2007 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 05/02/2006 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 05/05/2005 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 05/24/2004 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 127 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 05/05/2003 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 02/14/2002 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 03/27/2001 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 04/03/2000 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 04/26/1999 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 05/08/1998 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 05/13/1997 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 04/18/1996 -- DOCUMENTS PRIOR TO 1997 View image in PDF format Florida Department of State, Division of Corporations 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 128 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 129 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 130 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 131 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 132 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 133 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 134 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 135 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 136 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 137 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 138 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 139 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 140 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 141 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 142 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 143 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 144 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 145 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 146 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 147 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 148 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 149 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.ePacket Pg. 150Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 151 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.ePacket Pg. 152Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.ePacket Pg. 153Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 154 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 155 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 156 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 157 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 158 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 159 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 160 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 161 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 162 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 163 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 164 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 165 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 166 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 167 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 168 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 169 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 170 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 171 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 172 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 173 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) Page 1 | 2 6610 Willow Park Drive, Suite 200, Naples, FL 34109 (O) 239-597-0575 (F) 597-0578 February 14, 2020 Subject: Neighborhood Information Meeting Falling Waters Beach Resort PUD (PL20190000740) 6780 Beach Resort Drive, Naples, FL Dear Property Owner: Please be advised that a formal application has been submitted to Collier County seeking approval of a request to amend the Falling Waters Beach Resort PUD. The Falling Waters Beach Resort PUD is a condominium community located on the southeast corner of Tamiami Trail East and CR 951 (Collier Blvd) behind the CVS and Tractor Supply plazas. This PUD contains two access points – one along CR 951 and a second “emergency access only” along US 41. The Falling Waters Beach Resort Master Association (FWBRA) is requesting a change to the PUD in order to convert the US 41 access point from “emergency access only” to a “emergency only” point of ingress and a “right out only” point of egress. The additional “right out” turning movement is requested to improve accessibility and convenience and alleviate safety concerns expressed by the residents. In compliance with the Administrative Code for Land Development requirements, a Neighborhood Information Meeting will be held to provide you an opportunity to become fully aware of proposed request and to give you an opportunity to ask questions and provide input. The Neighborhood Information Meeting will be held on Thursday, March 5, 2020 at 5:00 pm. The meeting will be held at the Falling Waters Beach Resort Club House at 6780 Beach Resort Drive, Naples, FL. Should you have questions prior to the meeting, please contact me. Sincerely, RWA, Inc. Patrick Vanasse, AICP Director of Community Development 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 174 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) Page 2 | 2 Project Location 6780 Beach Resort Drive, Naples Folio #:00724840009, 00726722507,00726722701 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 175 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) K:\2019\190148.00.00 Falling Waters Beach Resort\002 Rezone Amendment Application Preparation\Letter of No impact in lieu of TIS.docx Page 1 6610 Willow Park Drive Suite 200 Naples, FL 34109 | (239) 597-0575 | Fax (239) 597-0578 www.consult-rwa.com LETTER OF NO IMPACT IN LIEU OF TIS As discussed with Mike Sawyer this Letter of No Impact is provided in lieu of a TIS. As addressed in the Project Narrative and Detail of Request, this petition is requesting a change the PUD in order to convert the US 41 access point from “emergency access only” to a “emergency only” point of ingress and “right out only” point of egress. No other changes to the PUD are requested. Therefore, the project’s density and intensity will remain the same and project trips and traffic impacts will also remain unchanged. A TIS is therefore not needed as part of this petition. 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 176 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) ********************************************************************************* 5.15 ACCESS TO U.S.41 Access shall be provided to U.S. 41 East generally in the area shown on the PUD Master Concept Plan, Exhibit “A”, with the following conditions: 1) Left and right turn lanes shall be provided at the entrance if and when required by FDOT. The entrance road intersection with U.S. 41 shall include arterial level street lighting at the time it is constructed. 2) The developer shall provide a fair share contribution toward the capital cost of a traffic signal at the entrance when deemed warranted by the County Engineer. The signal will be owned, operated and maintained by Collier County. 3) These improvements are considered “site related” as defined in Collier County Ordinance No. 2001-13, and shall not be applied as credits toward any impact fees required by that Ordinance. Road impact fees shall be in accordance with the fee schedule set forth in -Collier County Consolidated Impact Fee Ordinance No. 2001-13. 4) Ingress from U.S. 41 shall be emergency access only. 5) Egress to U.S. 41 shall only allow a right-out turning movement. **************************************************************************************** 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 177 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) ********************************************************************************* 5.15 ACCESS TO U.S.41 Access shall be provided to U.S. 41 East generally in the area shown on the PUD Master Concept Plan, Exhibit “A”, with the following conditions: 1) Left and right turn lanes shall be provided at the entrance if and when required by FDOT. The entrance road intersection with U.S. 41 shall include arterial level street lighting at the time it is constructed. 2) The developer shall provide a fair share contribution toward the capital cost of a traffic signal at the entrance when deemed warranted by the County Engineer. The signal will be owned, operated and maintained by Collier County. 3) These improvements are considered “site related” as defined in Collier County Ordinance No. 2001-13, and shall not be applied as credits toward any impact fees required by that Ordinance. Road impact fees shall be in accordance with the fee schedule set forth in -Collier County Consolidated Impact Fee Ordinance No. 2001-13. 4) Ingress from U.S. 41 shall be emergency access only. 5) Egress to U.S. 41 shall only allow a right-out turning movement. **************************************************************************************** 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 178 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) MASTER CONCEPT PLAN9.A.1.ePacket Pg. 179Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 180 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 181 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 182 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 183 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 184 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 185 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 186 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 187 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 188 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 189 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 190 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 191 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) l' 2ering sign(s) must bc posted by thc pctitioncr or thc Mtioncr's agcnt on the parccl for a minimum of fiftcca (15) calcndar days in advancc ofthe firs public hearing and said signG) must bc maintaiocd by thc pctitioncr or the petition€r's agcnt though thc Board of County Commissioncrs Hc8ri4. B€low aro gcocral grridelincs for signs, howcvq th€s6 guidclincs should n;t bc construed to superEcde any rcquiroment of the LDC. For spccific sign rcquircmsnts, plcasc rcfcr to tho AdminisEativc Codc, ClDptcr 8 E. l. Thc sign(s) must be crcc-ted in firll vicw ofthe publig not mor€ than five (5) feet tom thc ncarcst s1rcd right-of-way or csscmcnt. 2. The sigo(s) must bs sccurEly affircd by nailq $aplcs, or othcr mcam to a wood framc or to a wood panel and thgn fsstcncd s€curcly to a posl or othcr struc-t[c. Tbc sign rnay not bc affixed to a Erc or otha foliagc.3. Thc paitiorcr or tlc pctitioncf,'s agcnt must msintain tbc sig($ in placc, and rcadablc condition util tbr rcquc$cd actiotr has been hcard and a finai dccision rondcrod. If thc sign(s) is dcsnoycd, lost, or rcndsrcd unrcadablq thc pAtioncr or thc Mlion€r's agent mud rcplace thc sign(s SIGN I'OSTNYC INCTRUCT'IONS (CHAPTER E, COLLIER COTNTY ADMINISIRATIVE CODE FOR LAND DEVELOPMENI) IIAS BEEN POSTED, TEIS ATTIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE SEOULD BE RETUR]\'ED NO LATER TEAN TEN (TO) WORKING DAYS BEFORE TEE NRST EEARING DATE TO TEE ASSIGNED PLANI\ER AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE STATE OF FLORIDA COLINTY OF COI T rFR BEFORE THE IJNDERSIGNED AUTHORITY, PERSONALLY APPEARED NOTE; AFTER IEE SIGN WHO ON OATII SAYS THAT EF/SIIE I{AS POSTED PROPER COLLIER COTNry I.},ND DEVEIOPMENT CODE ON NOTICE AS REQUIRED By SECTION l0_03.m oF THE THE PARCEL CO!g:ERED IN PETMON NT'IIBER 6610 Willow Park Driv€, Suits $0 IGNA II 'R F APPUCANT OR AGENT Patic* Vana$e, AICP NAME CTYPED OR PRINTED)t STREET OR P.O. BOX Napl6s, Florida 34109 CITY, STATE ZIP STATE OF FLORIDA COI.JNTY OF COLLIER Thc forogoiry insfumqnt was swom to and subscribed bcforc me this day or tChre(r . zoffr. uy lr-II {t.r Cqm!4ty toofelg__Ec or who produccd , as irlcntification and who did/did Dot t8kc an o8th. My Counission Expires: (Stamp with serid umber) ;ffi:ffi "1*otary ReY.3,/42015 Priuted Name 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 192 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) TO ENGINEER!NG MEMORANDUM DATE:March 6,2020 Tim Finn, AICP, Principal Planner Collier County - Growth Management Department: Zoning Division FROM Kenrick Gallander, AICP on behalf of Patrick Vanasse, AICP Director of Community Development RWA Engineering PROJECT NAME:Falling Waters Beach Resort - PDt (pL2O19OOOO74O) Neighborhood lnformation Meeting - Summary A Neighborhood lnformation Meeting (NlM) was held on March 5,2020, at 5:00pm at the Falling Waters Beach Resort Clubhouse at 5780 Beach Resort Drive, Naples, FL. Attendees are as follows: . Kenrick Gallander, AlCp - RWA Engineering o Jane Eichhorn, Permitting Manager - RWA Engineeringr Timothy Finn, AlCp principal planner - Collier County General Public Attendees: o See attached Sign-ln Sheet Summary (Started at 5:00 p.m.): Mr' Gallander introduced himself, the Project Team and parameters of the information meeting. 5610 willow Pork Drive. suite 2@, Noples, Florido 34109 . l23g) 597-0s75, fox: (239) s9l-ostgo www.coosutt-rwo.com SUBJECT: &\arr\rsr4.o.o tot&E wdm 8e6 Rd\@ M\M6t@ h\M fury FhoL& Poge I of 2 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 193 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) PW M r. Gallander provided foundational aspects of the Falling Water Beach Resort pUD proposed to beamended. He further specified that the applicant's petition is a request for a PUD lnsubstantial Change to allow a right-out egress to U.S. 41 from the subject property utilizing the existing emergency only access point. Mr. Gallander outlined the documents that will need to be revised, the language in the revised pUD, the review process and that this application will only be required to go in front of the Collier County planning Commission for consideration of approval based on the recommendation of staff and input from the NlM. Mr. Gallander then opened the floor to a question and answer period with the audience. Questions/Comments asked or offered at the meeting: Mr. Gallander: We can only speak to this particular petition and the process for this petition. Deferred to the Board Members of Falling waters to help provide any details they know of for permitting and construction based on the zoning amendment. Mr. Frank: Explained their best estimates timeline of the construction/contactor. Mr. Gallander explained the Planning Commission process and professional opinion on timeline for com pletion. Q: What happens if the gate doesn't work? We don't want the gate to stay open Board Member: Responded by explaining the Board, once informed of the issue, will do their best to follow the process of informing their gate repair company to address the issue. The intent is to make sure this gate, if broken, will not be left opened. Mr. Gallander concluded by introducing the County's Project Planner in attendance and again asking if there were any more questions regarding this particular amendment application and the process. Board Member asked for a show of hand of who was in support of this project. From what was observed, an overwhelming majority in the room raised their hands. Board Member fudher informed the audience regarding the possible need to attend the March 19th Planning Commission meeting in support ofthe application. They will let everyone know. The meeting adjourned around 5:15 p,m. 6610 Willow Pork Drive, Suile 200, Noples, Floddo 34109 . {239J 597-0575, fox: {239) 597{578 . www.consull-rwo.com Poge 2 ol2 Q: Timeline as to when it will happen; when the construction will start and how long will it take? 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 194 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) ENGINEERING Sign-ln Sheet Falling Waters Beach Resort - pDl NIM 5-Mar-20 Name Street Address City Phone fl Email -V tt,* <' . tm.'4z-6Zo ,t/a ^).63 /-Zs ? -14 afi-lsr'3bbob70,a7 ul)e . tz io/ ad /71-'*t:,((? lca fzztC ).t- r- t i t-,I,t,t1-J <t Qtu lts /3Rl 4("'.,z3/ - 77,l-st't y." /6-;..f, -zl /,0 .A60l.z<5a5C 4-* r,s../L (T=il47t8>J7/-fr3/5t/1t.q-'\cl(2-6r-\rar*J 9ii-Ao-ao,iLgf, /'ttk t -l-nltes bq b-J4-9oot @ /101, AA,tL :li -::,1 ',: :'@i-"nO44J 3.-;..2h-Lzla 4tA J 7 \- t'/t;-hs, .tl I t:ilc..5n* , (t2- ,1 - Joi oS4 /1/c/qt7*f ao# t rc3$,ot'62a1t-4r2|, \?.f .'i\, aA =*,,66 o 4 I1 FcL e 5 -- z,A)1r.,./h/L.-- Company ./- /, 2,4 , ,,. / ) 11 / ,'\ A'/1 ,f/ /^ i-_ 51o d t MVaFI eF(o .,- arl4.(o.i",a11,Q7oa4/o ( ?b6 +q 7,^do, 716o e{ 44 g/) --J;atftto^t,t+L /oa Ts!i,*, +;^*._ a..,to 6gao t ? /ll.^.r^-IS b&/0 n a Dbzo 4, 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 195 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) ENGINEERING Slgn-ln Sheet Falllng Waters Beach Resort - pDl NIM 5-Mar-20 Name lq1npany Street Address City Phone S Email t. 4t -t' , tl ucfl &,".t,&,4/ Ot #9 n4*2.42 .as- rLr -2 ' 05 J >na4t S.a\latr*r,' , ,'r124Li '/{/o )Lr+t,-51L3&' gh3L /-.e3 D 63) 3ar-90o,6!l ,nJ, irt ao, c..,'rc -/: u-)7 o &+'( (e-i.,+VeltS t,ii lrY- (,b.*l L € [ ,/. A:L JIALUT-a 0 'n^A-loto- Usl-att b Oz" ,t-"-,, p.,,., /,<' i?,zs g o- )l1-t t1t a J.n o r !r 4 r rt\clr?-,.ro^+y'-la, r.,<z'K lbEltsz d t,.+,1 . l.co ' rwr, stral. Ca, "l - ri I - Y ' +s+a'i!,G|tt flp Q4c4s-z o EN/et -a /r dt?-/J3- -1329'O()/rl S€L>on tetTrLn LPlo r t r,t 0 -orr2F..l 6,,,,'.,^b 96)7?o Q19 L9't1\t rtP (€it fu ruA 4ta$,8 ) CL'Cs4 7 72,4 J -2->. zerJ<.-ttt goo 3,..'//10/?-?26'L?7- raai,"irw,,,ru AiJA"l4 -72(eto d (t,L)l - )\L - a1t Il^.3tl0 lo 6U-33q-3331t)'.* D ,224 (7\ t {,aAli*a'fu*r=67Lto 3 ll 7Q2.315. s9 E<il>&s z<e caw\caz,'T nA7J+1 .j6b4o 5DL.4..t-r- , <but .tt-^L 1,'1 0 0 t-'/ J (e?&o -\,t \ta+b,*a*- Cal o ,t LLCo dtt ,, L1q zs F. li t,r t, ', Aoo,r', I,,j,:-. f l-M,* { t- o>ba 1/ b 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 196 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) .= € -cx IJ.J JU E & UTA UE 1NUARY curf,rurr (nrcf a)rEtoorElu ltatcr dPfotrAtto,gl (,F,icl ct,OIAI MA,o|At t t,,,5 J9, rcn.8 AC 202 rc,z$ ac a5, tA; a, - Taun fr4 * lccess to U.S.lt willbe controlled bya 24-wid€ sptit iron 8ate. Atriarer in the road willop€nthe right se.tion of th€ gate to allowrh€ ritht out movem€nt. Soth s€ctlons of the 8.t€ will op€n for €mer8€n.y vehictes _ Emrrgrncy Acccrs Onlyr lngrrss f:om U,S, .11 * Right olrt Onty cgr.$ to u.s al fltwtlftd'l @ fitFfii t17ilI1i FALI,ING WATERS 8'ACH AESOR.I MASTER ASSO<IATION INC FALLING WAT85 SEACH AESORT*K MASTER CONCEPT PLAN FAWM W$vtrffi ffiAeild ffir 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 197 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) * !t * tt * * ,l t* * {. * * * * * * * * * * * * * ti rt ,i * * * * * * * * * * :f * * * * * * ,t * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * !* ,t * ,t ,i * * * * rf ri * !f rf * * * rt * * * 5.15 ACCESS TO U.S.41 Access shall be provided to U.S. 41 East generally in the area shown on the PUD Master Concept plan, Exhibit "A", with the following conditions: 1) Left and right turn lanes shall be provided at the entrance if and when required by FDOT. The entrance road intersection with U,S. 41 shall include arterial level street lighting at the time it is constructed. 2) The developer shall provide a fair share contribution toward the capital cost of a traffic signal at the entrance when deemed warranted by the County Engineer. The signal will be owned, operated and maintained by Collier County. 3) These improvements are considered "site related" as defined in Collier County Ordinance No. 2007-13, and shall not be applied as credits toward any impact fees required by that Ordinance. Road impact fees shall be in accordance with the fee schedule set forth in -Collier County Consolidated lmpact Fee Ordinance No. 2001-13. 4) lngress from U.S. 41 shall be emersencv access onlv. 5) Esress to U.S. 41 shall onlv allow a right-out turning movement. ,****ri****!i*,**'****'i,t*,f*,t *!*,***'i*,t*!t'i'B!**,f*,t,t't:f**,t******,i,*,tr,**,**,t:frt,i***!t,t*:t*,t,t!t*,t:t,i{.********,i 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 198 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) baTIII,asp}3 E,!, 99 TigI !5 EE-rt 1 2 I.ti!ti rI,i I fl ilr'i ET6-tg<rrt rr lt:' l'E E36:.Etg$ \ .gI iriEtt Ei E IEE r5t i ;,8 T !;,IE iig i!E T I I 3 qttr !*lHla iffiir ,Gt 6 E H HE s $I I il[!ilmlil[! E E E E v ilq!qxl9.A.1.ePacket Pg. 199Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) ,t ,* + * * * :r * :* :i + ,t * * * * ,t t ,t .t * )* :t * :| :i + * ,l ,t ,* ,* :* ,i ,t ,| ,l ,t :l ,* ,t :* * :t * ,t * ,* :t )r :r + ,t ,t * .t ,t ,* :t ri + + ,t ,* ,t ,a ,r :i + + + + * ,t ,t ,* :* :t :t + + Access shall be provided to U.S.41 East generally in the area shown on the PUD Master Concept plan, Exhibit "A", with the following conditions: 2) The developer shall provide a fair share contribution toward the capital cost of a traffic signal at the entrance when deemed warranted by the County Engineer. The signal will be owned, operated and maintained by Collier County. 3) These improvements are considered "site related" as defined in Collier County Ordinance No. 2001-13, and shall not be applied as credits toward any impact fees required by that ordinance. Road impact fees shall be in accordance with the fee schedule set forth in -Collier County Consolidated lmpact Fee Ordinance No. 2001-13. 4) lngress from U.S. 41 shall be emerqencv access onlv. 5) Eqress to U.S. 41 shall onlvallow a risht-out turninp movement. ,***,1**,l)t:*:t,l**!t**'t:l'*)t:*'li,t**t**,tI!t*,t:i*'t:t)t+***t*)t,t:t*,t*****I't,t:**)i,t*,t**+,*t,ft,t)*,i**t*rt!**I'f:t'*t,t,i,i 5.15 ACCESS TO U.S.41 1) Left and right turn lanes shall be provided at the entrance if and when required by FDor. The entrance road intersection with U.S. 41 shall include arterial Ievel street lighting at the time it is constructed. 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 200 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) -PUBLIG HEATIilG ilOTICE talling Waters Beach Besort PUD Planned UniiDevelopment lnsubstantial Change Petition No . 201 90000740 CCPC: MARCH 19, 2020 - 9:00 a'm' Collier CountY Government Center 3299 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, FL 34112 Timothy Finn, AlcP, Princigal PlarrGr: 239'252-4312. C a I I ,, ', 'li"ro ;r;,rii f;!;!lrlrrr ';;i1tffir't I I l;' lllll ll ;iiii'"''= t{o fl larlrtl IIIII aaa illlr' i,j lri'Lit-lll - fa-- rfll ll f ;;ii;i'i ii: it ,.r f lt, - t ot't'iltlltlt! .cr ., "ori'i;;;;i I J 2- t' " :i.. ". i f! ';4 , I I ,.'', ', a .g lr. 2 ,. I 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 201 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) -PUBLIC HEAHIilG I{OTICE talling Waters Beach Besort PUD planned unifDevelopment lnsubstantial Ghange o Petition No. 20190000740 GCPC: MABCH 19. 2020 - 9:00 a'm' Collier CountY Government Center 3299 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, FL 34112 Timothy Finn, Alcp, princigal plarrer: 239 -252-4312. a a I IJ II rlllllllllliru l!!llllrl ;;fff':rr rmb t[]n lllil a illlirlJlll ilF F I- ,lltl, \,, lti'\il-lll .\ "l{t rll ,,,l1 !liiiiiiiii rlil-. Iraa, .t I'iirlilirii I rlrllll ll ri- t I ill L '**'ta fro.j I ,ril ll a a t) t._ )a,l : t \ !,r . -s l a 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 202 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) Falling Waters Beach Hesort PUD Planned Unit Deuelopment lnsuhstantial Petition No. 201 90000740 Change CCPC: JUNE ll. 2020 r g:00 a.m. collier county Government center 3299 East Tamiami rrail, Naples, FL 34 l1z "Timothy Finn, AICP, Principal Planner: 239-282-4312 9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 203 Attachment: Attachment E - Updated hearing property signs (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) P u B L I c H E A r I ll G N o T I c E t I I I W t r S B e a G h H e s 0 r t P U 0aIngaeI I c h d u a t D I m e n t I n s u b s t a n t I a a n g eptannenIBve0p Petition No CCPG: JUNE ll' Collier CountY 201 90000740 2O2O - 9:00 a'In' Ga o G ove r n m e n t C e n t e r Ta Tr a N a p e S F L 34 1 1 2 3 2 I I E a S t m a m , I P I r 2 3 I 2 5 2 4 3 I 2cPPB,a a n n e ! h F A I l I n c I a o T f t v I n nImo ,, a ,t - -. .rr] ..r " lll'-l.rriiiiiS iit ,;iii rr.rtj '!"til t"'' --- :l"l 9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 204 Attachment: Attachment E - Updated hearing property signs (12082 : Falling Waters Beach Resort (PDI)) 9.A.1.gPacket Pg. 205Attachment: Attachment F - Waiver Applicant for hybrid quasi-judicial hearing- Falling Waters Beach Resort (12082 : Falling Waters Beach 06/11/2020 COLLIER COUNTY Collier County Planning Commission Item Number: 9.A.2 Item Summary: CPUD-PL20190000683: An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida amending Ordinance Number 14-06, the 7-Foodmart Commercial Planned Unit Development (CPUD), and by amending Ordinance Number 2004-41, the Collier County Land Development Code by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of 1.09 acres of land presently zoned Residential Multi-Family-12 District (RMF-12) within the Santa Barbara Commercial Overlay District to incorporate the parcel into the 7 -Foodmart CPUD for a total PUD size of 2.12± acres; and to increase the commercial square footage from 10,000 square feet to 15,000. The subject property is located on the east side of Santa Barbara Boulevard, north of Golden Gate Parkway in Section 21, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida; and by providing an effective date. [Coordinator: Nancy Gundlach, AICP, PLA, Principal Planner] Meeting Date: 06/11/2020 Prepared by: Title: Planner, Principal – Zoning Name: Nancy Gundlach 05/15/2020 11:27 AM Submitted by: Title: Manager - Planning – Zoning Name: Ray Bellows 05/15/2020 11:27 AM Approved By: Review: Road Maintenance Nancy Gundlach Review item Skipped 05/15/2020 9:54 AM Zoning Nancy Gundlach Review Item Skipped 05/15/2020 9:54 AM Growth Management Operations & Regulatory Management Nancy Gundlach Review Item Skipped 05/15/2020 9:54 AM Growth Management Department Nancy Gundlach Review Item Skipped 05/15/2020 9:54 AM Zoning Nancy Gundlach Review Item Skipped 05/15/2020 9:54 AM Planning Commission Mark Strain Meeting Pending 06/11/2020 9:00 AM 9.A.2 Packet Pg. 206 7-Foodmart CPUD, PUDZ-PL20190000683 February 27, 2020 Page 1 of 19 STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: ZONING DIVISION – ZONING SERVICES SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION - PLANNING AND REGULATION HEARING DATE: MARCH 5, 2020 SUBJECT: PUDZ-PL20190000683, 7-FOODMART CPUD (COMMERCIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT) _________________________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT/OWNER: AGENT: Kelvin and Anand Deonarine Jessica Harrelson, AICP 2332 Santa Barbara Boulevard Davidson Engineering, Inc. Naples, Florida 34116 4365 Radio Road, Suite 201 Naples, Florida 34104 REQUESTED ACTION: The petitioner requests that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) consider an Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida amending Ordinance Number 14- 06, the 7-Foodmart Commercial Planned Unit Development (CPUD), and by amending Ordinance Number 2004-41, the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC) by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of 1.09 acres of land presently zoned Residential Multi-Family-12 District (RMF-12) within the Santa Barbara Commercial Overlay District to incorporate the parcels into the 7-Foodmart CPUD for a total Planned Unit Development (PUD) size of 2.12± acres; to increase the commercial square footage from 10,000 square feet to 15,000, by amending the master plan; adding deviations; revising developer commitments; and by providing an effective date. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The 2.12± acre subject property is located on the east side of Santa Barbara Boulevard, approximately 1 mile north of Golden Gate Parkway, with a physical street address of 2634, 2348, 2332, and 2290 Santa Barbara Boulevard, located in Section 21, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. (See Location Map on preceding page.) 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 207 Attachment: STAFF REPORT 7-Foodmart FINAL 2-27-20 (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 7-Foodmart CPUD, PUDZ-PL20190000683 February 27, 2020 Page 2 of 19 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 208 Attachment: STAFF REPORT 7-Foodmart FINAL 2-27-20 (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 7-Foodmart CPUD, PUDZ-PL20190000683 February 27, 2020 Page 3 of 19 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 209 Attachment: STAFF REPORT 7-Foodmart FINAL 2-27-20 (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 7-Foodmart CPUD, PUDZ-PL20190000683 February 27, 2020 Page 4 of 19 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 210 Attachment: STAFF REPORT 7-Foodmart FINAL 2-27-20 (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 7-Foodmart CPUD, PUDZ-PL20190000683 February 27, 2020 Page 5 of 19 PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The petitioner requests that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) consider an amendment to Ordinance No. 14-06, the 7-Foodmart CPUD, approved on February 25, 2014. The 7- Foodmart is an existing 1.03± acre grocery store located within the Santa Barbara Commercial Overlay (SBCO) District. The petitioner proposes to add 1.09± acres of land located to the north and south of the current site to allow for future expansion. The expansion will increase the currently permitted 10,000 square feet to 15,000 square feet of commercial land uses in the C-1 through C-4 zoning districts and as provided for in the SBCO Zoning Overlay. The following revisions are proposed to the PUD Document: 1. Increase the maximum square feet of gross floor area to 15,000 square feet from the existing permitted 10,000 square feet; 2. Update the legal description and PUD acreage; 3. Update the Development Standards Table to clarify that the cooler addition, constructed on the east side of the existing building, shall be allowed to be setback a minimum of 12.2 feet from Tropical Way; 4. Retain existing Deviations for the expansion properties; 5. Add Deviation #5, seeking to permit a total of 16 parking spaces along the alley, Tropical Way, for the use of public and employee parking; 6. Add Deviation #6, seeking to allow a 12.5-foot impervious area encroachment for a distance of 86.3 feet, within the 15-foot Type ‘B’ landscape buffer along Tropical Way; 7. Amend the Native Tree Preservation Requirement, to include the addition of four trees within the preservation requirement, as a result of the expansion properties (for a total of eight trees to be preserved on-site); 8. Amend Transportation Commitment #1 to remove language prohibiting tractor-trailers from making deliveries and addition of language requiring that a loading space be constructed to accommodate deliveries made by tractor-trailers; 9. Eliminate Transportation Commitments #2 and #3, as they no longer apply; 10. Amend Transportation Commitment #5 to reflect the updated maximum trip generation allowed by the proposed use; 11. Removal of the Schedule of Development/Monitoring Report and Sunset Provision section; 12. Addition of the PUD Monitoring Section, using current language requested by County Staff; 13. Addition of Exhibit G – “Encroachment Exhibit” as a supplement to Deviation #6; and 14. Updates to the PUD Master Plan. 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 211 Attachment: STAFF REPORT 7-Foodmart FINAL 2-27-20 (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 7-Foodmart CPUD, PUDZ-PL20190000683 February 27, 2020 Page 6 of 19 SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: North and South: Residential duplex dwellings, with a zoning designation of Residential Multi- Family-12 District (RMF-12) at 12 dwelling units per acre within the SBCO District. East: Tropical Way, (an alley) and then multi-family dwellings and single-family dwellings with a zoning designation of Residential Multi-Family-12 District (RMF-12) at 12 dwelling units per acre within the SBCO District. West: Santa Barbara Boulevard, a four-lane divided right-of-way and then single-family dwellings with a zoning designation of Estates (E). AERIAL PHOTO Subject Site 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 212 Attachment: STAFF REPORT 7-Foodmart FINAL 2-27-20 (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 7-Foodmart CPUD, PUDZ-PL20190000683 February 27, 2020 Page 7 of 19 GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY: Future Land Use Element (FLUE): Comprehensive Planning staff has reviewed the proposed PUD Rezone and has found it consistent with the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the GMP. See Attachment B – FLUE Consistency Review. Transportation Element: In evaluating this project, staff reviewed the applicant’s August 6, 2019, Trip Generation Statement (TIS) for consistency with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan (GMP) using the then applicable 2018 as well as the current 2019 Annual Update and Inventory Reports (AUIR). Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP states; “The County Commission shall review all rezone petitions, SRA designation applications, conditional use petitions, and proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) affecting the overall countywide density or intensity of permissible development, with consideration of their impact on the overall County transportation system, and shall not approve any petition or application that would directly access a deficient roadway segment as identified in the current AUIR or if it impacts an adjacent roadway segment that is deficient as identified in the current AUIR, or which significantly impacts a roadway segment or adjacent roadway segment that is currently operating and/or is projected to operate below an adopted Level of Service Standard within the 5-year AUIR planning period, unless specific mitigating stipulations are also approved. A petition or application has significant impacts if the traffic impact statement reveals that any of the following occur: a. For links (roadway segments) directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; b. For links adjacent to links directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; and c. For all other links the project traffic is considered to be significant up to the point where it is equal to or exceeds 3% of the adopted LOS standard service volume. Mitigating stipulations shall be based upon a mitigation plan prepared by the applicant and submitted as part of the traffic impact statement that addresses the project’s significant impacts on all roadways.” Staff finding: According to the TIS provided with this petition, the proposed PUD rezone to add a 5,000 square- foot addition to the current 7-Foodmart development will generate a potential +/- 19 PM peak hour, two-way trips. The +/- 19 additional trips are based on the proposed addition compared to the existing 10,000 square-foot development using the current 10th edition ITE trip generation. Staff notes that the previously approved development used a now out-of-date ITE use calculation for a specialty market in the 9th edition which is no longer used. The applicant wishes to retain the previously approved trip generation for the trip cap. Furthermore, a previous developer 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 213 Attachment: STAFF REPORT 7-Foodmart FINAL 2-27-20 (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 7-Foodmart CPUD, PUDZ-PL20190000683 February 27, 2020 Page 8 of 19 commitment regarding timing for turn-lanes has been removed and the required right turn-lane into the development is shown on the Master Plan. The trips generated by this development will occur on the following adjacent roadway link: Roadway Link 2018 AUIR LOS Current Peak Hour Peak Direction Service Volume/Peak Direction 2018 Remaining Capacity 2019 AUIR LOS 2019 Remaining Capacity Santa Barbara Boulevard Green Boulevard to Golden Gate Parkway C 2,100/North 860 D 480 Based on the 2018 and 2019 AUIR’s, the adjacent roadway network has sufficient capacity to accommodate the proposed trips for this project within the 5-year planning period. Therefore, the subject rezoning can be found consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan. Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME): Environmental Services staff has found this project to be consistent with the CCME. The project site consists of 34 native trees. A minimum of three trees (10%) of the existing native trees shall be maintained onsite. Based on the above analysis, Comprehensive Planning staff finds the proposed rezone consistent with the FLUE and the Golden Gate Area Master Plan of the GMP. ANALYSIS: Staff completed a comprehensive evaluation of this land use petition including the criteria upon which a recommendation must be based, specifically noted in LDC Subsection 10.02.13 B.5., Planning Commission Hearing and Recommendation (commonly referred to as the “PUD Findings”), and Subsection 10.02.08 F., Nature of Requirements of Planning Commission Report (referred to as “Rezone Findings”), which establish the legal bases to support the CCPC’s recommendation. The CCPC uses these same criteria as the basis for their recommendation to the BCC, who in turn use the criteria to support their action on the rezoning request. An evaluation relative to these subsections is discussed below, under the heading “Zoning and Land Development Review Analysis.” In addition, staff offers the following analyses: Environmental Review: Environmental Services staff has reviewed the PUD petition to address environmental concerns. The PUD Master Plan provides for a total of eight native trees to be preserved on-site, which meets the minimum 10% preservation requirement in accordance with LDC section 3.05.07 Three trees are required to be preserved on site for the proposed petition (34 trees x 10%= 3 trees); the applicant has proposed to preserve four trees. The previously approved Ordinance 14-06 required four trees to be preserved on-site; resulting in a total of eight trees to be preserved on-site. The property has been maintained devoid of native midstory vegetation and 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 214 Attachment: STAFF REPORT 7-Foodmart FINAL 2-27-20 (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 7-Foodmart CPUD, PUDZ-PL20190000683 February 27, 2020 Page 9 of 19 ground cover; as such, a tree survey was used to determine the native tree preservation requirement. No listed animal species were observed on the property. This project does not require Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) review, as this project did not meet the EAC scope of land development project reviews as identified in Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Codes of Laws and Ordinances. Utilities Review: The project lies within the regional potable water service area and the Golden Gate wastewater service area of the Collier County Water-Sewer District (CCWSD). However, the project will continue to be served by a septic system since no active wastewater infrastructure is readily available. Water service is readily available via connection(s) to the 10” water main along the west side of 55th Terrace SW, extended between homes, and sufficient water treatment capacity is available. Transportation Review: Transportation Planning staff has reviewed the petition for compliance with the GMP and the LDC and recommends approval. Landscape Review: The East landscape buffer labeled on the Master Plan is consistent with the LDC with the exception of the portion for which the applicant is seeking a deviation. The North and South landscape buffers are consistent with the LDC. The 10-foot wide West landscape buffer was previously approved through a deviation in the original PUD. A six-foot wide drainage and utility easement is located within the 10-foot West landscape buffer. Currently, plantings are not permitted within drainage easements and the code allows up to a two-foot overhang of a parked vehicle into a landscape buffer 10-feet or greater in width. A double row of shrubs spaced three- feet on center is required in a Type ‘D’ landscape buffer where abutting vehicular areas. Although the full buffer width is shown on the Master Plan, the plantings will be restricted to a four-foot wide area within the West buffer. Zoning and Land Development Review: The subject site is located on the east side of Santa Barbara Boulevard approximately 1 mile north of Golden Gate Parkway in the RMF-12 zoning designation within the Santa Barbara Commercial Overlay (SBCO) District. It is surrounded by residential development, the development to the north and south is residential development located in the RMF- 12 zoning designation within SBCO District. The development to the east is single-family and multi-family development located in the RMF-12 zoning designation within the SBCO District. The development to the west and across Santa Barbara Boulevard is single-family residences in the Estates (E) zoning district. The Master Concept Plan depicts the general location of the building area, parking area, water management areas, dumpster area, loading bay, landscape buffer areas and a sidewalk along Santa Barbara Boulevard. The Master Concept Plan also shows the existing 6,754 square-foot building and 8,000 square-foot proposed building expansion. The site depicts three ingress/egress points, one on Santa Barbara Boulevard and two on Tropical Way, an alley. The buildings will remain at the previously approved maximum of two-stories, a zoned height of 35 feet, and an actual height of 42 feet. A Type B landscape buffer will be provided along the north, 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 215 Attachment: STAFF REPORT 7-Foodmart FINAL 2-27-20 (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 7-Foodmart CPUD, PUDZ-PL20190000683 February 27, 2020 Page 10 of 19 south and a portion of the east property lines (trees 25 feet on center and a six-foot hedge). A 10- foot wide Type D landscape buffer (trees 30 feet on center and where the parking lot abuts the street, a three-foot height hedge) is proposed along the Santa Barbara Boulevard right-of-way. There are a total of six deviations related to architectural façade treatments, walls, landscape buffering and parking. Deviations 1 thru 4 were previously approved and two deviations, Deviations 5 and 6 are new. (For more information, please refer to the Deviations section of this Staff Report.) REZONE FINDINGS: LDC Subsection 10.02.08 F. states, “When pertaining to the rezoning of land, the report and recommendations to the planning commission to the Board of County Commissioners…shall show that the planning commission has studied and considered proposed change in relation to the following when applicable. (Staff’s responses to these criteria are provided in non-bold font): 1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies and future land use map and the elements of the GMP. The Comprehensive Planning Department has indicated that the proposed PUD Rezone is consistent with all applicable elements of the FLUE and Golden Gate Area Master Plan of the GMP. 2. The existing land use pattern. As described in the “Surrounding Land Use and Zoning” portion of this report and discussed in the zoning review analysis, the neighborhood’s existing land use pattern can be characterized as residential. There are existing single-family and multi-family residences within a Commercial overlay to the north, south and east. To the west is a single-family in the Estates zoning designation. 3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. The proposed 7-Foodmart CPUD is located within the “Urban (Commercial District, Santa Barbara Commercial Subdistrict) on the Future Land Use Map of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element. In addition, the PUD includes standards for buffering and building heights, setbacks, and architectural design that have been provided to ensure the project is compatible with the adjoining land uses. Therefore, staff is of the opinion that the proposed CPUD will not result in an isolated district unrelated to nearby districts along the Santa Barbara corridor. 4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. The proposed PUD district boundaries are logically drawn and conform to the “Urban (Commercial District, Santa Barbara Commercial Subdistrict) on the Future Land Use Map of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element. 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 216 Attachment: STAFF REPORT 7-Foodmart FINAL 2-27-20 (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 7-Foodmart CPUD, PUDZ-PL20190000683 February 27, 2020 Page 11 of 19 5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed amendment necessary. The growth and development trends, changing market conditions, and the development of the surrounding area, support the proposed PUD Rezone. This site is designated for a mix of commercial uses that are specified within the parameters of the LDC’s SBCO District and the applicant intends to develop the property within the parameters of the SBCO District. 6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. While the proposed commercial development is an extension to the existing commercial development within the Santa Barbara Commercial Subdistrict, it is currently surrounded by existing residential development. The landscape buffering and architectural standards will help blend the proposed commercial development into the neighborhood. Furthermore, Santa Barbara Boulevard is a four-lane arterial road and the proposed commercial development is more appropriate along an arterial roadway than residential development. In addition, there are many neighboring Golden Gate City residents without automobiles who walk and benefit from commercial development such as this that is located nearby. 7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety. The roadway infrastructure has adequate capacity to serve the proposed project at this time, i.e., the GMP is consistent at the time of rezoning as evaluated as part of the GMP Transportation Element consistency review. Operational impacts will be addressed at the time of first development order (SDP or Plat). Additionally, the project’s development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals are sought. 8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem. The proposed development will not create a drainage problem. Furthermore, the project is subject to the requirements of Collier County and the South Florida Water Management District. 9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas. The proposed change will not seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas. 10. Whether the proposed change would adversely affect property values in the adjacent area. Staff is of the opinion this PUD rezone will not adversely impact property values. However, zoning by itself may or may not affect values, since value determination by law is driven by market value. 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 217 Attachment: STAFF REPORT 7-Foodmart FINAL 2-27-20 (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 7-Foodmart CPUD, PUDZ-PL20190000683 February 27, 2020 Page 12 of 19 11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. Properties surrounding the site are already developed. The basic premise underlying all of the development standards in the LDC is that their sound application, when combined with the site development plan approval process and/or subdivision process, gives reasonable assurance that a change in zoning will not result in deterrence to improvement or development of adjacent property. Therefore, the proposed zoning change should not be a deterrent to the improvement of adjacent properties. 12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare. The proposed rezone to CPUD is in compliance with the GMP. The GMP is a public policy statement supporting zoning actions when they are consistent with said plan. In light of this fact, the proposed CPUD does not constitute a grant of special privilege. Consistency with the GMP is further determined to be a public welfare relationship because actions consistent with plans are in the public interest. 13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning. The subject property can be developed within existing zoning. 14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the county. The change suggested is not out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the county. 15. Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. There may be other sites in the County that could accommodate the uses proposed; however, this is not the determining factor when evaluating the appropriateness of a zoning decision. The petition was reviewed on its own merit for compliance with the GMP and the LDC; and staff does not review other sites in conjunction with a specific petition. 16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of si te alteration which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. Any development anticipated by the PUD Document would require site alteration and this site will undergo evaluation relative to all federal, state, and local development regulations during the site development plan process. 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 218 Attachment: STAFF REPORT 7-Foodmart FINAL 2-27-20 (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 7-Foodmart CPUD, PUDZ-PL20190000683 February 27, 2020 Page 13 of 19 17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County GMP and as defined and implemented through the Collier County adequate public facilities ordinance. The development will have to meet all applicable criteria set forth in the LDC regarding Adequate Public Facilities. The project must also be consistent with all applicable goals and objectives of the GMP regarding adequate public facilities. This petition has been reviewed by county staff that is responsible for jurisdictional elements of the GMP as part of the rezoning process, and that staff has concluded that no Level of Service will be adversely impacted. 18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety and welfare. To be determined by the BCC during its advertised public hearing. PUD FINDINGS: LDC Subsection 10.02.13.B.5 states that, “In support of its recommendation, the Planning Commission shall make findings as to the PUD Master Plan’s compliance with the following criteria.” (Staff’s responses to these criteria are provided in non-bold font): 1. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. As previously stated, the property is designated for commercial uses as identified by the Urban (Commercial District, Santa Barbara Commercial Subdistrict) on the Future Land Use Map of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element. The PUD already receives potable water service from the CCWSD, and there is adequate water treatment capacity available to future development as proposed by this petition. The Conceptual Master Plan (Exhibit C) reserves space for a conceptual drain field to provide septic service to the expanded food mart. 2. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Documents submitted with the application, which were reviewed by the County Attorney’s Office, demonstrate unified control of the property. Additionally, the development will be required to gain site development plan approval. These processes will ensure that appropriate stipulations for the provision of, continuing operation of, and maintenance of infrastructure will be provided by the developer. 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 219 Attachment: STAFF REPORT 7-Foodmart FINAL 2-27-20 (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 7-Foodmart CPUD, PUDZ-PL20190000683 February 27, 2020 Page 14 of 19 3. Conformity of the proposed Planned Unit Development with the goals, objectives and policies of the GMP. County staff has reviewed this petition and has offered an analysis of the relevant goals, objectives and policies of the GMP within the GMP discussion of this Staff Report. Based on that analysis, staff is of the opinion that this petition can be found consistent with the overall GMP. 4. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. The development standards, landscaping and buffering requirements contained in the PUD Document are designed to make the proposed uses compatible with the adjacent uses. Staff believes that this petition is compatible, with the existing land uses and with the existing undeveloped land. Additionally, the Development Commitments contained in the PUD Document provide additional requirements the developer will have to fulfill. 5. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. The amount of open space set aside for this project meets the minimum requirement of the LDC. 6. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. The roadway infrastructure is sufficient to serve the proposed project, as noted in the Transportation Element consistency review. Operational impacts will be addressed at the time of first development order (SDP or Plat), at which time a new TIS will be required to demonstrate turning movements for all site access points. Finally, the project’s development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals, including but not limited to any plats and or site development plans, are sought. The CCWSD has sufficient treatment capacity for water service to the project. Conveyance capacity must be confirmed at the time of development permit application. Wastewater service will be accomplished onsite via septic system. 7. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. The area has adequate supporting utility infrastructure, including a readily available County water main, to accommodate this project, and the property can support a septic system for wastewater service. The subject property has the ability to support expansion based upon the commitments made by the petitioner and the fact that adequate public facilities requirements will be addressed when development approvals are sought. 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 220 Attachment: STAFF REPORT 7-Foodmart FINAL 2-27-20 (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 7-Foodmart CPUD, PUDZ-PL20190000683 February 27, 2020 Page 15 of 19 8. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. The petitioner is seeking 6 deviations to allow design flexibility in compliance with the purpose and intent of the Planned Unit Development Districts (LDC Section 2.03.06 A). This criterion requires an evaluation of the extent to which development standards and deviations proposed for this PUD depart from development standards that would be required for the most similar conventional zoning district. Staff believes that the deviations proposed can be supported, finding that, in compliance with LDC Section 10.02.13 A.3., the petitioner has demonstrated that "the elements may be waived and will not have a detrimental effect on the health, safety and welfare of the community" and LDC Section 10.02.13 B.5.h., the petitioner has demonstrated that the deviations are “justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations.” Please refer to the Deviation Discussion portion of the staff report below for a more extensive examination of the deviations. DEVIATION DISCUSSION: As previously stated, the petitioner is seeking 6 deviations from general LDC requirements and has provided justification in support of the deviations. Deviations 1 thru 4 were previously approved and the request is to allow the Deviations to apply to the proposed extension parcels. Deviations 5 and 6 are new. Staff has analyzed the deviation requests and provides the analysis and recommendations below: Deviation #1 “Deviation #1 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.05.08 C.9.b., “Freestanding Building within a PUD,” which requires all façades for freestanding structures within a PUD to be treated as a primary façade, except for secondary facades, to require only the façade facing Santa Barbara Boulevard to be treated as a primary façade.” Petitioner’s Justification: The current PUD Ordinance permits the above deviation for the existing building on-site; therefore, it is being requested that the proposed future building expansion be permitted to also provide one primary façade, along Santa Barbara Boulevard. The only major roadway that the project is visible from is Santa Barbara Boulevard (along the west) and the required perimeter landscape buffers, wall, and plantings sufficiently screen the site on all other sides. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Zoning and Land Development Review staff recommends APPROVAL finding that, in compliance with LDC Section 10.02.13 A.3., the petitioner has demonstrated that “the element may be waived without a detrimental effect on the health, safety and welfare of the community” and LDC Section 10.02.13 B.5.h., the petitioner has demonstrated that the deviation is “justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations.” 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 221 Attachment: STAFF REPORT 7-Foodmart FINAL 2-27-20 (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 7-Foodmart CPUD, PUDZ-PL20190000683 February 27, 2020 Page 16 of 19 Deviation #2 “Deviation #2 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.03.02 H., “Wall Requirement between Residential and Non-residential Development,” which requires a masonry wall, concrete or pre-fabricated concrete wall and/or fence to be constructed on a non-residential property when it lies contiguous to or opposite a residentially zoned district, to instead allow a Type “B” buffer inclusive of a 6-foot high hedge consistent with LDC section 4.06.02 C.2. where residential zoning occurs on the north and south perimeter boundaries of the subject property.” Petitioner’s Justification: The current PUD Ordinance permits the above deviation, allowing a Type B Landscape Buffer, inclusive of a 6-foot hedge, along the existing north and south perimeter boundaries; consequently, the same deviation is being requested for the proposed expansion. This will apply to the new north and south perimeter boundaries that are a result of the addition of Lots 5,6 and 10 of the Golden Gate Unit 6-Block 189 Plat. Per LDC Section 2.03.07 H. 1. “Santa Barbara Commercial Overlay District,” existing residential uses, other than owner-occupied dwellings, are required to cease to exist within a specified time period. The intent of the Santa Barbara Commercial Overlay District is to eliminate residential development to create a commercially developed area. In addition, new residential development is not permitted within the Overlay. Therefore, the construction of a wall adjacent to the existing multi-family residential units to the north and south seems unnecessary and the 6-foot high hedge will provide sufficient screening from the site. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Zoning and Land Development Review staff recommends APPROVAL finding that, in compliance with LDC Section 10.02.13 A.3., the petitioner has demonstrated that “the element may be waived without a detrimental effect on the health, safety and welfare of the community” and LDC Section 10.02.13 B.5.h., the petitioner has demonstrated that the deviation is “justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations.” Deviation #3 “Deviation #3 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.06.02 C.4., “Alternative D Landscape Buffer,” which requires a 15-foot wide Type “D” landscape buffer when the ultimate right-of-way is 100 or more feet, to instead provide a 10-foot wide Type “D” buffer along Santa Barbara Boulevard.” Petitioner’s Justification: The current PUD permits the above deviation, thus the request is for the expansion parcels. Due to the shallow depth of the project, the provision of a 15-foot wide landscape buffer would diminish the developable area and circulation of the proposed development. The request for a reduction of 5 feet in the landscape buffer along Santa Barbara Boulevard does not result in any negative impacts to the community. Lastly, the alternative 10-foot landscape buffer being requested will consist of the same plant material and spacing requirements per the LDC for a Type D buffer. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Zoning and Land Development Review staff recommends APPROVAL finding that, in compliance with LDC Section 10.02.13 A.3., the petitioner has demonstrated that “the element may be waived without a detrimental effect on the health, safety and 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 222 Attachment: STAFF REPORT 7-Foodmart FINAL 2-27-20 (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 7-Foodmart CPUD, PUDZ-PL20190000683 February 27, 2020 Page 17 of 19 welfare of the community” and LDC Section 10.02.13 B.5.h., the petitioner has demonstrated that the deviation is “justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations.” Deviation #4 “Deviation #4 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.06.02 C.2, “Alternative Landscape Buffer,” as well as LDC Section 5.03.04 A.2, specifying dumpster enclosures not to encroach into the required landscape buffer area, to instead allow the dumpster enclosure to be located as shown on the MPC and to provide a 5-foot wide buffer with the same planting materials required of a Type “B” buffer on the west side of the dumpster enclosure, as also shown on the Master Plan.” Petitioner’s Justification: Deviation #4 was approved with the existing PUD and is to remain with no requested changes. The proposed expansion does not affect this previously approved deviation. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Zoning and Land Development Review staff recommends APPROVAL finding that, in compliance with LDC Section 10.02.13 A.3., the petitioner has demonstrated that “the element may be waived without a detrimental effect on the health, safety and welfare of the community” and LDC Section 10.02.13 B.5.h., the petitioner has demonstrated that the deviation is “justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations.” Proposed Deviation #5 “Deviation #5 seeks relief from LDC section 4.05.02 E.4., Parking Access Standards, which allows “nonresidential development which abuts an alley, a maximum of ten parking spaces, not to exceed 30% of the required parking…. may be accessed solely from the alley”…..and “these spaces shall be for the exclusive use of employees and service vehicles,” to instead allow a total of 16 parking spaces (26.6% of the required parking) to be accessed from the alley, for the use of public and employee parking.” Petitioner’s Justification: Justification: This deviation is requesting to allow a total of 16 spaces to be accessed from Tropical Way, which is 6 spaces more than what is currently permitted by the LDC (the LDC permits a maximum of 10 spaces). The 16 spaces being requested is still below the 30% maximum, also required within LDC Section 4.05.02 E.4. During peak hours for the existing business, parking can be problematic; therefore, maximizing parking for the development will promote public safety. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Zoning and Land Development Review staff recommends APPROVAL finding that, in compliance with LDC Section 10.02.13 A.3., the petitioner has demonstrated that “the element may be waived without a detrimental effect on the health, safety and welfare of the community” and LDC Section 10.02.13 B.5.h., the petitioner has demonstrated that the deviation is “justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations.” 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 223 Attachment: STAFF REPORT 7-Foodmart FINAL 2-27-20 (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 7-Foodmart CPUD, PUDZ-PL20190000683 February 27, 2020 Page 18 of 19 Proposed Deviation #6 “Deviation #6 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.06.02 D.4.c “Sidewalks and Impervious Areas Within Landscape Buffers,” which permits a 5-foot encroachment of impervious area within a 15- foot Type ‘B’ buffer, to instead allow a 12.5-foot encroachment for a distance of 86.3 feet within the 15-foot Type ‘B’ buffer along Tropical Way. Compensating landscape area shall be provided along the same buffer. Refer to Exhibit G.” Petitioner’s Justification: Justification: Due to the shallow depth of the property and the required infrastructure to accommodate the site, the developable area is very limited. All required plant material will be installed, as required, along the same boundary; therefore, there will be no decrease in the plant material being provided within the 15-foot Type B buffer along Tropical Way. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Given that the structure encroaching into the East buffer is existing and the petitioner has demonstrated there will be no net loss of landscape area or landscape material, Zoning and Land Development Review staff recommends APPROVAL finding that, in compliance with LDC Section 10.02.13 A.3., the petitioner has demonstrated that “the element may be waived without a detrimental effect on the health, safety and welfare of the community” and LDC Section 10.02.13 B.5.h., the petitioner has demonstrated that the deviation is “justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations.” NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM): The applicant conducted a NIM on January 23, 2020, at the Golden Gate Community Center, located at 4701 Golden Gate Parkway in Naples, Florida. There was one attendee, a neighbor adjacent to and north of the subject property. The neighbor had an issue with the delivery truck(s) damaging his landscaping when turning into the alley. The 7-Foodmart property owner has agreed to replace the damaged landscaping. Please see Attachment C: Neighborhood Information Notes and Attachment D: Email COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: This Staff Report was reviewed by the County Attorney’s office on February 25, 2020. RECOMMENDATION: Planning and Zoning Review staff recommends that the Collier County Planning Commission forward Petition PUDZ-PL20190000683 to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of approval. Attachments: Attachment A: Proposed PUD Ordinance Attachment B: FLUE Consistency Review Attachment C: Neighborhood Information Notes Attachment D: Email Attachment E: Application 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 224 Attachment: STAFF REPORT 7-Foodmart FINAL 2-27-20 (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.aPacket Pg. 225Attachment: STAFF REPORT 7-Foodmart FINAL 2-27-20 (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) ORDINANCE NO. 20- AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 14-06, THE 7-FOODMART COMMERCIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (CPUD), AND BY AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2004-41, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF 1.09 ACRES OF LAND PRESENTLY ZONED RESIDENTIAL MULTI- FAMILY-12 DISTRICT (RMF-12) WITHIN THE SANTA BARBARA COMMERCIAL OVERLAY DISTRICT TO INCORPORATE THE PARCELS INTO THE 7-FOODMART CPUD FOR A TOTAL PUD SIZE OF 2.12± ACRES; AND TO INCREASE THE COMMERCIAL SQUARE FOOTAGE FROM 10,000 SQUARE FEET TO 15,000. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF SANTA BARBARA BOULEVARD, NORTH OF GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY IN SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. [PL20190000683] WHEREAS , on February 25 , 2014 , the Board of County Commissioners approved Ordinance Number 14-06 , the 7-Foodmart Commercial Planned Unit Development (the "PUD"); and WHEREAS , Jessica Harrelson AICP of Davidson Engineering , Inc., representing Kelvin Deonarine and Anand Deonarine, petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to amend the P UD and rezone 1.09 acres. NOW, THEREFORE , BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY , FLORIDA , that: SECTION ONE: Amendment to the PUD Document of Ordinance No. 2014-06, as amended The zoning classification of approximately 1.09+/-acres of the herein described real property located in Section 21 , Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County , Florida is changed from a Rural Agricultural zoning district to the 7-Foodmart Commercial Planned Unit Development (PUD) Zoning District and when combined with the existing 7-Foodmart PUD provides for a 2.12+/-acre project in accordance with the Exhibit A through Exhibit G, attached [ 19-CPS-0 I 9 I 3/1 52066 I /I )76 7-Foo dmart/2019 00 00 683 1/31/20 1 of2 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 226 Attachment: Attachment A- Proposed PUD Ordinance - 020520(2) (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) hereto and incorporated by reference herein. The appropriate zoning atlas map or maps, as described in Ordinance Number 04-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, is/are hereby amended accordingly. SECTION TWO: This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by super-majority vote of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this ___ day of ________ , 2020. ATTEST: CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK By:----------- Deputy Clerk Approved as to form and legality: \A(, I' e, 1,P -H-e-id_i_A_s_h-to-n--C-ic_k_o _______ J-" C, ,, Managing Assistant County Attorney Attachments: Exhibit A -Permitted Uses Exhibit B -Development Standards Exhibit C -Master Plan Exhibit D -Legal Description Exhibit E -Deviations BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By:-------------- Burt L. Saunders, Chairman Exhibit F -Development Commitments Exhibit G-Deviation #6 Exhibit [ 19-CPS-0I 913 /1520661 /1 )76 7-Foodmart/20 I 90000683 1/31 /20 2 of2 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 227 Attachment: Attachment A- Proposed PUD Ordinance - 020520(2) (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 228 Attachment: Attachment A- Proposed PUD Ordinance - 020520(2) (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 229 Attachment: Attachment A- Proposed PUD Ordinance - 020520(2) (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 230 Attachment: Attachment A- Proposed PUD Ordinance - 020520(2) (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 231 Attachment: Attachment A- Proposed PUD Ordinance - 020520(2) (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 232 Attachment: Attachment A- Proposed PUD Ordinance - 020520(2) (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 233 Attachment: Attachment A- Proposed PUD Ordinance - 020520(2) (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.bPacket Pg. 234Attachment: Attachment A- Proposed PUD Ordinance - 020520(2) (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart 9.A.2.bPacket Pg. 235Attachment: Attachment A- Proposed PUD Ordinance - 020520(2) (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 236 Attachment: Attachment A- Proposed PUD Ordinance - 020520(2) (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 237 Attachment: Attachment A- Proposed PUD Ordinance - 020520(2) (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 238 Attachment: Attachment A- Proposed PUD Ordinance - 020520(2) (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 239 Attachment: Attachment A- Proposed PUD Ordinance - 020520(2) (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 240 Attachment: Attachment A- Proposed PUD Ordinance - 020520(2) (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.bPacket Pg. 241Attachment: Attachment A- Proposed PUD Ordinance - 020520(2) (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart ‒ 1 ‒ Growth Management Department Zoning Division C O N S I S T E N C Y R E V I E W M E M O R A N D U M To: Nancy Gundlach, AICP, Principal Planner, Zoning Services Section From: Corby Schmidt, AICP, Principal Planner, Comprehensive Planning Section Date: November 26, 2019 Subject: Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) Consistency Review PETITION NUMBER: PL20190000683 [REV: 3] PETITION NAME: 7-Foodmart PUD (Planned Unit Development) to PUD Rezone REQUEST: This petition seeks a PUD-to-PUD rezone, by adding ±1.09 (vacant) acres from the RMF- 12-SBCO zoning district (Residential Multi-family at a density of 12 dwelling units per acre and Santa Barbara Commercial Overlay) to the existing ±1.03-acre 7-Foodmart PUD to expand the 7-Foodmart PUD to allow floor area expansion of the butcher shop/grocery store (“specialty market & deli”) and add a new loading dock to the larger store. These lots are double-frontage lots, which front both Santa Barbara Boulevard and Tropical Way – a public alley. This alley is proposed to provide two new additional commercial points of access; provide new, additional direct access to the new loading dock, provide new additional immediate access to (a total of) 16 off-street parking spaces, and reconfigure/relocate the water management facilities and septic drain field. LOCATION: The subject site, consisting of ±2.12 acres, is located on east side of Santa Barbara Boulevard, described as Lots 5 through 10, Block 10, of Golden Gate Unit 6, in Section 21, Township 49 South, Range 26 East. COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING COMMENTS: No revisions to the PUD document or other materials made after the previous review held Comprehensive Planning implications. The existing PUD, and both parcels included in the proposed expansion, are designated Santa Barbara Commercial Subdistrict on the Future Land Use Map of the GGAMP. This Subdistrict is intended to provide Golden Gate City with an area that is primarily low intensity retail commercial, offices, personal services, and institutional development opportunities that: • Generate/attract relatively low traffic volumes; • Are appropriately landscaped and buffered to protect nearby residential properties; • Are architecturally designed to be compatible with nearby residential areas; and, • Limit access and traffic flow to or from Santa Barbara Boulevard. 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 242 Attachment: Attachment B-FLUE Consistency Review (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) ‒ 2 ‒ This Subdistrict goes on to list twelve items (standards and provisions) that are to be included in a zoning overlay, to be adopted within one year, to implement this Subdistrict. That zoning overlay has been adopted (Santa Barbara Commercial Overlay). As such, consistency with this Subdistrict is achieved by complying with the requirements, limitations and standards of that zoning overlay. Staff defers that determination to Zoning Services staff. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.6 requires new development to be compatible with, and complementary to, surrounding land uses, as set forth in the Land Development Code (Ordinance 04-41, adopted June 22, 2004 and effective October 18, 2004, as amended). Comprehensive Planning leaves this determination to the Zoning Services staff as part of their review of the petition in its entirety. The compatibility analysis is encouraged to be comprehensive and include a review of both the subject property and surrounding or nearby properties regarding allowed use intensities and densities, development standards, building mass, building location and orientation, traffic generation/attraction, and especially how the low intensity restrictions currently imposed as existing Transportation Development Commitments are proposed to be removed to allow for higher-intensity truck traffic, truck sizes, and the use of the alley for full-size truck use, full- size truck deliveries and full-size truck parking. The County recognizes Smart Growth policies and practices in its consideration of future land use arrangements and choice-making options. FLUE Objective 7 and Policies 7.1 through 7.4 promote Smart Growth policies for new development and redevelopment projects pertaining to access, interconnections, open space, and walkable communities. Each Policy is followed by preliminary staff analysis [in bold italicized text]. Objective 7: Promote smart growth policies, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and adhere to the existing development character of Collier County, where applicable, and as follows: Policy 7.1: The County shall encourage developers and property owners to connect their properties to fronting collector and arterial roads, except where no such connection can be made without violating intersection spacing requirements of the Land Development Code. [The subject site fronts Santa Barbara Boulevard and an unclassified, local alley (Tropical Way). The Master Plan depicts the relocation (northward)of the single existing connection to Santa Barbara Boulevard; relocation (northward) of an existing connection to the alley and, provision two new connections to the alley.] Policy 7.2: The County shall encourage internal accesses or loop roads in an effort to help reduce vehicle congestion on nearby collector and arterial roads and minimize the need for traffic signals. [The small property does not lend itself to either of these arrangements.] 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 243 Attachment: Attachment B-FLUE Consistency Review (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) ‒ 3 ‒ Policy 7.3: All new and existing developments shall be encouraged to connect their local streets and/or interconnection points with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless of land use type. The interconnection of local streets between developments is also addressed in Policy 9.3 of the Transportation Element. [The subject site fronts Santa Barbara Boulevard and an alley (Tropical Way). No new interconnection is proposed, while the next property north and the next property south are within in the same commercial Subdistrict. Because these commercial, double-frontage lots also have access to both Santa Barbara Boulevard and the local alley, additional interconnection may still be an advantage.] Policy 7.4: The County shall encourage new developments to provide walkable communities with a blend of densities, common open spaces, civic facilities and a range of housing prices and types. [This project will allow for a grocery store with a deli to more than double its floor area, along with all the previously-allowed uses within this PUD, while this Policy is directed mainly to residential development. However, Subdistrict language and the LDC include provisions for sidewalks and coordination of sidewalk location between adjacent properties. CONCLUSION: Based upon the above analysis, this proposed PUDR may be deemed consistent with the GGAMP. PETITION ON CITYVIEW cc: Ray Bellows, Zoning Manager, Zoning Services Section David Weeks, AICP, Growth Management Manager, Comprehensive Planning Section G: Comp\Consistency Reviews\2019 \\bcc.colliergov.net\data\GMD-LDS\CDES Planning Services\Consistency Reviews\2019\PUDR\PL2019-683 7-Foodmart R3_FNL.docx 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 244 Attachment: Attachment B-FLUE Consistency Review (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 4365 Radio Road • Suite 201 • Naples, FL 34104 • P: 239.434.6060 • www.davidsonengineering.com D esigningE xcellence Civil Engineering • Planning • Permitting M E M O R A N D U M January 31, 2020 TO: Nancy Gundlach, AICP, PLA FROM: Jessica Harrelson, AICP, Senior Planner RE: 7-Foodmart PUDR-PL20190000683 Neighborhood Information Meeting Summary Davidson Engineering conducted a Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) for the subject 7-Foomdart PUDR Application on Thursday, January 23rd, 2020 at 5:30 p.m. The meeting was held at the Golden Gate Community Center, located at 4701 Golden Gate Parkway, Naples, FL 34116. Jessica Harrelson, AICP, with Davidson Engineering, was in attendance to represent the Applicants. The sign-in sheet, attached, indicates that 1 individual from the public was in attendance, along with Nancy Gundlach with Collier County. Copies of the draft PUD Document were available at the meeting. Jessica Harrelson, Agent for the Applicants, conducted the meeting and gave an overview of the proposed project. A copy of the PowerPoint presentation is attached for reference. Following the presentation, the attendee was asked for questions or comments. The following list is a summary of questions asked and responses given by the agent in bold. 1. Is the building doubling in size? Response: The request is to increase the maximum gross floor area square footage from 10,000 SF to 15,000 SF. The existing building is just under 7,000 SF, so yes, the request is for a maximum 15,000 SF. 2. Where will the parking spaces in the alley be? Response: Jessica uses the PowerPoint slide, depicting the spaces along the alley, to show the locations. 3. Will the parking spaces be parallel to Santa Barbara? Response: Yes. 4. Will there be landscaping along the north property line (note: the attendee owns the duplex abutting 7-Foodmart along the north)? Response: Yes, a 15’ Type B buffer, with a 6’ hedge is required at that location. Nancy further explains that trees are planted 25’ on center. 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 245 Attachment: Attachment C-Neighborhood Information Notes (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 7-Foodmart – PUDR-PL20190000683 January 31, 2020 2 5. Where is the additional 7,500 SF going? Response: Yes, the expansion is proposed going south. Jessica uses site plan to show the location. 6. You are setting up the alleyway is the access to the store? Response: Jessica responded that the LDC limits to the amount of access points along Santa Barbara. It is further explained that there is a lot of stop and go traffic on Santa Barbara, creating issues, that a turn lane is being constructed as well to alleviate some of the traffic congestion that is currently being experienced. 7. How will the turn lane work? Response: It’s a north-bound turn lane, 240’, and you can turn directly into the site. 8. Will the turn lane stop in front of the store, or continue in front of “my” property? Response: Jessica uses the site plan to show the location of the turn lane and property line. 9. The attendee brings up the “poor” trees that are existing within the north landscape buffer and lack of 6’ hedge (hedge is not tight). Response: Jessica replied that if landscaping is not installed per Code requirements and what is outlined in the PUD, the County will not approve it at inspection. 10. You are going to reduce congestion on Santa Barbara and moving it to the back? Response: We are also adding a turn lane. 11. Do the trucks (delivery trucks) have access the alley from Coronado or only from 22nd? Response: Jessica responded that it is her understanding that trucks can use both access points for deliveries. 12. Do you know which access the use most? Response: Jessica responded she was not certain. 13. What is “my” setback from the alley? Response: Jessica stated she was uncertain but I can look that up and get it back to you. End of memo. 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 246 Attachment: Attachment C-Neighborhood Information Notes (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 1 LynchDiane From:mark@mecurtis.com Sent:Tuesday, January 28, 2020 10:05 AM To:'Kelvin Deonarine'; jessica@davidsonengineering.com Cc:GundlachNancy Subject:RE: 2280 Santa Barbara Blvd, Naples Fl 34116 EXTERNAL EMAIL:This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. That’s awesome Kevin!I really appreciate you and your brother stopping by and working with me in a neighborly manner.I look forward to the beefed up barrier between the properties, as well.I wish you continued success with your store. Regards Mark From:Kelvin Deonarine <deonarine8@aol.com> Sent:Tuesday, January 28, 2020 9:21 AM To:mark@mecurtis.com; jessica@davidsonengineering.com Subject:2280 Santa Barbara Blvd, Naples Fl 34116 Hi Mark It was a pleasure speaking with you yesterday.As per our conversation on 27th January 2020, we agreed for the following on the above mentioned property address: -Addition of fruit trees and plant it to your liking -Install sod on the apron and ride of way -Install metal reflectors on the back of the building to prevent further occurance. We apologize for any inconvenience caused and look forward to rectifying the problem. If you have any more questions, please feel free to contact me at 239-920-1587. Thank You Anand Deonarine 7 Food Mart & Tortilleria 2332 Santa Barbara Blvd Naples Fl, 34116 Deonarie8@aol.com 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 247 Attachment: Attachment D-Email (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 February 1, 2019 Page 1 of 11 Application for a Public Hearing for PUD Rezone, Amendment to PUD or PUD to PUD Rezone PETITION NO PROJECT NAME DATE PROCESSED PUD Rezone (PUDZ): LDC subsection 10.02.13 A.-F., Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code Amendment to PUD (PUDA): LDC subsection 10.02.13 E. and Ch. 3 G. 2 of the Administrative Code PUD to PUD Rezone (PUDR): LDC subsection 10.02.13 A.-F. APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Name of Property Owner(s): _________________________________________________________ Name of Applicant if different than owner: _____________________________________________ Address: _________________________City: _______________ State: _________ ZIP: ___________ Telephone: _______________________ Cell: ______________________ Fax: __________________ E-Mail Address: ____________________________________________________________________ Name of Agent: ____________________________________________________________________ Firm: _____________________________________________________________________________ Address: ____________________________City: _______________ State: _______ ZIP: __________ Telephone: ____________________ Cell: ____________________ Fax: _______________________ E-Mail Address: ____________________________________________________________________ Be aware that Collier County has lobbyist regulations. Guide yourself accordingly and ensure that you are in compliance with these regulations. To be completed by staff 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 248 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 February 1, 2019 Page 2 of 11 REZONE REQUEST This application is requesting a rezone from: _________________________ Zoning district(s) to the ________________________________ zoning district(s). Present Use of the Property: _________________________________________________________ Proposed Use (or range of uses) of the property: _________________________________________ Original PUD Name: ________________________________________________________________ Ordinance No.: ____________________________________________________________________ PROPERTY INFORMATION On a separate sheet attached to the application, provide a detailed legal description of the property covered by the application: • If the request involves changes to more than one zoning district, the applicant shall include a separate legal description for property involved in each district; • The applicant shall submit 4 copies of a recent survey (completed within the last six months, maximum 1" to 400' scale), if required to do so at the pre-application meeting; and • The applicant is responsible for supplying the correct legal description. If questions arise concerning the legal description, an engineer's certification or sealed survey may be required. Section/Township/Range: / / Lot: Block: Subdivision: ___________________________________________________ Metes & Bounds Description: _________________________________________________________ Plat Book: Page #: Property I.D. Number: ____________________________________ Size of Property: _______ ft. x _______ ft. = ________ Total Sq. Ft. Acres: _________ Address/ General Location of Subject Property: __________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ PUD District (refer to LDC subsection 2.03.06 C): Commercial Residential Community Facilities Industrial Mixed Use Other: ________________ 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 249 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 February 1, 2019 Page 3 of 11 ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE Zoning Land Use N S E W If the owner of the subject property owns contiguous property please provide a detailed legal description of the entire contiguous property on a separate sheet attached to the application. Section/Township/Range: / / Lot: Block: Subdivision: ___________________________________________________ Plat Book: Page #: Property I.D. Number: ____________________________________ Metes & Bounds Description: _________________________________________________________ ASSOCIATIONS Required: List all registered Home Owner Association(s) that could be affected by this petition. Provide additional sheets if necessary. Information can be found on the Board of County Commissioner’s website at http://www.colliergov.net/Index.aspx?page=774. Name of Homeowner Association: _________________________________________________ Mailing Address: ____________________________ City: _________ State: ______ ZIP: ______ Name of Homeowner Association: _________________________________________________ Mailing Address: ____________________________ City: _________ State: ______ ZIP: ______ Name of Homeowner Association: _________________________________________________ Mailing Address: ____________________________ City: _________ State: ______ ZIP: ______ Name of Homeowner Association: _________________________________________________ Mailing Address: ____________________________ City: _________ State: ______ ZIP: ______ Name of Homeowner Association: _________________________________________________ Mailing Address: ____________________________ City: _________ State: ______ ZIP: ______ 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 250 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 February 1, 2019 Page 4 of 11 EVALUATION CRITERIA Pursuant to LDC subsections 10.02.13 B, 10.02.08 F and Chapter 3 G. of the Administrative Code, staff’s analysis and recommendation to the Planning Commission, and the Planning Commission’s recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners shall be based upon consideration of the applicable criteria. On a separate sheet attached to the application, provide a narrative statement describing the rezone request with specific reference to the criteria below. Include any backup materials and documentation in support of the request. a.The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. b.Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the county attorney. c.Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives and policies of the Growth Management Plan. (This is to include identifying what Sub-district, policy or other provision allows the requested uses/density, and fully explaining/addressing all criteria or conditions of that Sub-district, policy or other provision.) d.The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. e.The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. f.The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. g.The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. h.Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications of justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. Deed Restrictions: The County is legally precluded from enforcing deed restrictions; however, many communities have adopted such restrictions. You may wish to contact the civic or property owners association in the area for which this use is being requested in order to asce rtain whether or not the request is affected by existing deed restrictions. Submitted as separate document. 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 251 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 February 1, 2019 Page 5 of 11 Previous land use petitions on the subject property: To your knowledge, has a public hearing been held on this property within the last year? If so, what was the nature of that hearing? __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ Official Interpretations or Zoning Verifications: To your knowledge, has there been an official interpretation or zoning verification rendered on this property within the last year? Yes No if so please provide copies. PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIREMENTS This land use petition requires a Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM), pursuant to Chapter 3 E. of the Administrative Code and LDC section 10.03.06. Following the NIM, the applicant will submit a written summary and any commitments that have been made at the meeting. Refer to Chapter 8 B. of the Administrative Code for the NIM procedural requirements. Chapter 8 of the Administrative Code requires that the applicant must remove their public hearing advertising sign(s) after final action is taken by the Board of County Commissioners. Based on the Board's final action on this item, please remove all public hearing advertising sign(s) immediately. RECORDING OF DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS Within 30 days of adoption of the Ordinance, the owner or developer (specify name) at their expense shall record in the Public Records of Collier County a Memorandum of Understanding of Developer Commitments or Notice of Developer Commitments that contains the legal description of the property that is the subject of the land use petition and contains each and every commitment of the owner or developer specified in the Ordinance. The Memorandum or Notice shall be in form acceptable to the County and shall comply with the recording requirements of Chapter 695, FS. A recorded copy of the Memorandum or Notice shall be provided to the Collier County Planned Unit Development Monitoring staff within 15 days of recording of said Memorandum or Notice. LDC subsection 10.02.08 D This application will be considered “open” when the determination of “sufficiency” has been made and the application is assigned a petition processing number. The application will be considered “closed” when the petitioner withdraws the application through written notice or ceases to supply necessary information to continue processing or otherwise actively pursue the rezoning, amendment or change, for a period of 6 months. An application deemed “closed” will not receive further processing and an application “closed” through inactivity shall be deemed withdrawn. An application deemed “closed” may be re-opened by submission of a new application, repayment of all application fees and the grant of a determination of “sufficiency”. Further review of the request will be subject to the then current code. 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 252 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 February 1, 2019 Page 6 of 11 STATEMENT OF UTILITY PROVISIONS FOR PUD REZONE REQUEST APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Name of Applicant(s): _______________________________________________________________ Address: _________________________________ City: ___________ State: ________ ZIP: _______ Telephone: ____________________ Cell: _____________________ Fax: ______________________ E-Mail Address: ____________________________________________________________________ Address of Subject Property (If available): ______________________________________________ City: _________________ State: ________ ZIP: _________ PROPERTY INFORMATION Section/Township/Range: / / Lot: Block: Subdivision: ___________________________________________________ Metes & Bounds Description: _________________________________________________________ Plat Book: Page #: Property I.D. Number: ____________________________________ TYPE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL TO BE PROVIDED Check applicable system: a. County Utility System b. City Utility System c. Franchised Utility System Provide Name: __________________________ d. Package Treatment Plant (GPD Capacity): _________________________ e. Septic System TYPE OF WATER SERVICE TO BE PROVIDED Check applicable system: a. County Utility System b. City Utility System c. Franchised Utility System Provide Name: __________________________ d. Private System (Well) Total Population to be Served: ________________________________________________________ Peak and Average Daily Demands: A. Water-Peak: _________ Average Daily: __________ B. Sewer-Peak: _________ Average Daily: __________ If proposing to be connected to Collier County Regional Water System, please provide the date service is expected to be required: ____________________________________________________ 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 253 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 February 1, 2019 Page 7 of 11 Narrative statement: Provide a brief and concise narrative statement and schematic drawing of sewage treatment process to be used as well as a specific statement regarding the method of affluent and sludge disposal. If percolation ponds are to be used, then percolation data and soil involved shall be provided from tests prepared and certified by a professional engineer. __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ Collier County Utility Dedication Statement: If the project is located within the service boundaries of Collier County’s utility service system, a notarized statement shall be provided agreeing to dedicate the water distribution and sewage collection facilities within the project area to the Collier County Utilities. This shall occur upon completion of the construction of these facilities in accordance with all applicable County ordinances in effect at that time. This statement shall also include an agreement that the applicable system development charges and connection fees will be paid to the County Utilities Division prior to the issuance of building permits by the County. If applicable, the statement shall contain an agreement to dedicate the appropriate utility easements for serving the water and sewer systems. __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ Statement of Availability Capacity from other Providers: Unless waived or otherwise provided for at the pre-application meeting, if the project is to receive sewer or potable water services from any provider other than the County, a statement from that provider indicating adequate capacity to serve the project shall be provided. 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 254 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 7-FOODMART PUDR – PL20190000683 Level of Service – Revision 2 November 13, 2019 1 www.davidsonengineering.com PUBLIC FACILITIES LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) ANALYSIS 7-Foodmart PUDR proposed to add ±1.09-acres (Lots 5, 6 and 10 of the Golden Gate Unit 6-Block 189 Plat) into the existing 7-Foodmart CPUD to allow for future expansion. 7-Foodmart is located at 2332 Santa Barbara Blvd. The project proposes an expansion to the existing specialty Market and Deli with the associated infrastructure. A level of service analysis between the existing site use and the proposed use has been provided herein. Summary for Existing Use: Specialty Market and Deli 6,754 sf Lots 5, 6 and 10 are currently vacant Summary for Proposed Use: Specialty Market and Deli 15,000 sf The Capital Improvement Element of the Growth Management Plan establishes Levels of Service for the following: Arterial and Collector Roads Surface Water Management Systems Potable Water Systems Sanitary Sewer Systems Solid Waste Disposal Facilities Parks and Recreation Facilities Public School Facilities Each of the areas will be examined for the development in this summary report. Arterial and Collector Roads See included Traffic Impact Statement for Level of Service. The level of service is not significantly or adversely impacted by the proposed build-out. 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 255 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 7-FOODMART PUDR – PL20190000683 Level of Service – Revision 2 November 13, 2019 2 www.davidsonengineering.com Surface Water Management Systems The existing stormwater management system will be revised to accommodate the increase in project area and imperviousness. During the time of any development order permitting, the site’s storm water management system will be designed in accordance with LDC section 6.05.01. Potable Water and Sanitary Sewer Systems Potable water for the proposed site will continue to be provided by Collier County Utilities. Water service is readily available to the project via an existing 1 ½” water service line. Irrigation is also provided by Collier County Utilities via the existing 1 ½” water service line. During the time of SDP permitting it will be determined whether upsizing this water service line is necessary to account for potable/irrigation water demand and potentially fire protection for the proposed building. Wastewater will continue to be treated via a new private septic system. Please see the included Statement of Utility Provisions for proposed potable water and wastewater demands. Solid Waste Disposal Facilities According to the Collier County 2018 AUIR, currently there is an existing landfill capacity of 18,710,256 tons, and a ten-year landfill capacity requirement of 2,916,440 tons. The estimated life of the landfill is 51 years. The existing landfill capacity is adequate to accommodate the additional tons per capita generated by the proposed project. The level of service is not significantly or adversely impacted by the proposed build-out. Parks and Recreation Facilities The proposed change in use will have no measurable impact on Parks and Recreation Facilities. The level of service is not significantly or adversely impacted by the proposed change in use. Public School Facilities The proposed development will not create a negative impact on Public School Facilities. The uses will not impact school attendance. The level of service is not significantly or adversely impacted by the proposed change in use. Fire and EMS Facilities The subject site is located within the Greater Naples Fire Rescue District. The nearest fire/EMS station (station No. 70) is located at 4741 Golden Gate Parkway, less than 1 mile away from the subject site. The level of service for fire and EMS facilities is not significantly or adversely impacted by the proposed build- out. 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 256 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 7-Food Mart # Units GPD/Unit Net GPD 6,000 0.1 600 1,000 0.4 400 1,000 0.75 750 4 200 800 2,550 Peak Factor Total Peak Hour Flow (GPD) Total Peak Hour Flow (GPM) 4.4 11,132 8 Total Calculated Average Daily Flow (GPD) 2,550 SUBTOTAL Food Outlets (ADD PER WATER CLOSET) Type of Establishment Food Outlets excluding deli's, bakery, or meat dpt (PER SQ FT OF FLOOR SPACE) Food Outlets DELI (ADD PER SQ FT OF FLOOR SPACE) Food Outlets MEAT DPT (ADD PER SQ FT OF FLOOR SPACE) Project Capacity - COMMERCIAL 6/22/2017 CCPU Wastewater Flow Worksheets 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 257 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 February 1, 2019 Page 8 of 11 COVENANT OF UNIFIED CONTROL The undersigned do hereby swear or affirm that we are the fee simple titleholders and owners of record of property commonly known as ____________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________ (Street address and City, State and Zip Code) and legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto. The property described herein is the subject of an application for ______________ planned unit development (______________PUD) zoning. We hereby designate___________________, legal representative thereof, as the legal representatives of the property and as such, these individuals are authorized to legally bind all owners of the property in the course of seeking the necessary approvals to develop. This authority includes, but is not limited to, the hiring and authorization of agents to assist in the preparation of applications, plans, surveys, and studies necessary to obtain zoning approval on the site. These representatives will remain the only entity to authorize development activity on the property until such time as a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to Collier County. The undersigned recognize the following and will be guided accordingly in the pursuit of development of the project: 1. The property will be developed and used in conformity with the approved master plan including all conditions placed on the development and all commitments agreed to by the applicant in connection with the planned unit development rezoning. 2. The legal representative identified herein is responsible for compliance with all terms, conditions, safeguards, and stipulations made at the time of approval of the master plan, even if the property is subsequently sold in whole or in part, unless and until a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to and recorded by Collier County. 3. A departure from the provisions of the approved plans or a failure to comply with any requirements, conditions, or safeguards provided for in the planned unit development process will constitute a violation of the Land Development Code. 4. All terms and conditions of the planned unit development approval will be incorporated into covenants and restrictions which run with the land so as to provide notice to subsequent owners that all d evelopment activity within the planned unit development must be consistent with those terms and conditions. 5. So long as this covenant is in force, Collier County can, upon the discovery of noncompliance with the terms, safeguards, and conditions of the planned unit development, seek equitable relief as necessary to compel compliance. The County will not issue permits, certificates, or licenses to occupy or use any part of the planned unit development and the County may stop ongoing construction activity until the project is brought into compliance with all terms, conditions and safeguards of the planned unit development. ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Owner Owner ____________________________________ ___________________________________ Printed Name Printed Name STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF COLLIER) Sworn to (or affirmed) and subscribed before me this day of , 201__ by ____________________ who is personally known to me or has produced _____________________________ as identification. ____________________________________ Notary Public (Name typed, printed or stamped) 9 7-Foodmart 2332 Santa Barbara Blvd, Naples, FL 34117 Davidson Engineering Commercial C Kelvin Deonarine Anand Deonarine 4th June Anand Deonarine and Kelvin Deonarine 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 258 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOTS 5 THROUGH 10, BLOCK 189 OF GOLDEN GATE UNIT 6 AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 5, PAGES 124 THROUGH 134 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. THE ABOVE DESCRIBES AN AREA OF APPROXIMATELY 92,503 SQUARE FEET OR 2.12 ACRES OF LAND. SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS, RESTRICTIONS AND RESERVATIONS OF RECORD. 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 259 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 February 1, 2019 Page 9 of 11 Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code Amendment to PUD- Ch. 3 G. 2 of the Administrative Code PUD to PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code The following Submittal Requirement checklist is to be utilized during the Pre-Application Meeting and at time of application submittal. At final submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with an up-to-date application. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. A Model PUD Document is available online at http://www.colliercountyfl.gov/Home/ShowDocument?id=76983. REQUIREMENTS # OF COPIES REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Cover Letter with Narrative Statement including a detailed description of why amendment is necessary Completed Application with required attachments (download latest version) 1 Pre-application meeting notes 1 Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized 1 Property Ownership Disclosure Form 1 Notarized and completed Covenant of Unified Control 1 Completed Addressing Checklist 1 Warranty Deed(s) 1 List Identifying Owner and all parties of corporation 1 Signed and sealed Boundary Survey 1 Architectural Rendering of proposed structures 1 Current Aerial Photographs (available from Property Appraiser) with project boundary and, if vegetated, FLUCFCS Codes with legend included on aerial. 1 Statement of Utility Provisions 1 Environmental Data Requirements pursuant to LDC section 3.08.00 1 Environmental Data Requirements collated into a single Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) packet at time of public hearings. Coordinate with project planner at time of public hearings. Listed or Protected Species survey, less than 12 months old. Include copies of previous surveys. 1 Traffic Impact Study 1 Historical Survey 1 School Impact Analysis Application, if applicable 1 Electronic copy of all required documents 1 Completed Exhibits A-F (see below for additional information)+ List of requested deviations from the LDC with justification for each (this document is separate from Exhibit E) Checklist continues on next page 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 260 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 February 1, 2019 Page 10 of 11 Revised Conceptual Master Site Plan 24” x 36”and One 8 ½” x 11” copy Original PUD document/ordinance, and Master Plan 24” x 36” – Only if Amending the PUD Revised PUD document with changes crossed thru & underlined 1 Copy of Official Interpretation and/or Zoning Verification 1 *If located in Immokalee or seeking affordable housing, include an additional set of each submittal requirement +The following exhibits are to be completed on a separate document and attached to the application packet:  Exhibit A: List of Permitted Uses  Exhibit B: Development Standards  Exhibit C: Master Plan- See Chapter 3 E. 1. of the Administrative Code  Exhibit D: Legal Description  Exhibit E: List of Requested LDC Deviations and justification for each  Exhibit F: List of Development Commitments If located in RFMU (Rural Fringe Mixed Use) Receiving Land Areas Pursuant to LDC subsection 2.03.08.A.2.a.2.(b.)i.c., the applicant must contact the Florida Forest Service at 239- 690-3500 for information regarding “Wildfire Mitigation & Prevention Plan.” PLANNERS – INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: School District (Residential Components): Amy Lockheart Conservancy of SWFL: Nichole Johnson Utilities Engineering: Eric Fey Parks and Recreation: Barry Williams & David Berra Emergency Management: Dan Summers Immokalee Water/Sewer District: City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director Other: ASSOCIATED FEES FOR APPLICATION  Pre-Application Meeting: $500.00  PUD Rezone: $10,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre  PUD to PUD Rezone: $8,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre  PUD Amendment: $6,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre  Comprehensive Planning Consistency Review: $2,250.00  Environmental Data Requirements-EIS Packet (submittal determined at pre-application meeting): $2,500.00  Listed or Protected Species Review (when an EIS is not required): $1,000.00  Transportation Review Fees: o Methodology Review: $500.00 *Additional fees to be determined at Methodology Meeting. o Minor Study Review: $750.00 o Major Study Review $1,500.00 x x x x x x x x x x x 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 261 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 February 1, 2019 Page 11 of 11  Legal Advertising Fees: o CCPC: $1,125.00 o BCC: $500.00  School Concurrency Fee, if applicable: o Mitigation Fees, if application, to be determined by the School District in coordination with the County Fire Code Plans Review Fees are not listed, but are collected at the time of application submission and those fees are set forth by the Authority having jurisdiction. The Land Development Code requires Neighborhood Notification mailers for Applications headed to hearing, and this fee is collected prior to hearing. All checks payable to: Board of County Commissioners. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. *Additional fee for the 5th and subsequent re-submittal will be accessed at 20% of the original fee. ___________________________________ _____________ Signature of Petitioner or Agent Date ___________________________________ Printed named of signing party x 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 262 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 7-FOODMART PUDR – PL20190000683 Deviation Justifications November 14, 2019 1 7-FOODMART CPUD PROJECT NARRATIVE & EVALUATION CRITERIA PROJECT NARRATIVE The purpose of this Rezone is to add ±1.09-acres (Lots 5, 6 and 10 of the Golden Gate Unit 6- Block 189 Plat) into the existing 7-Foodmart CPUD to allow for future expansion. 7-Foodmart is located at 2332 Santa Barbara Blvd, in Section 21, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. The property has a base zoning of RMF-12 and is located within the Santa Barbara Commercial Overlay District (SBCO). The purpose and intent of this overlay district is to provide Golden Gate City and passerby travelers with commercial development within the subject area. Existing residential development within the Overlay, other than owner-occupied dwellings, are required to cease to exist within a specified time period (to be determined by Collier County). Adjacent residential development to the north and south of the expansion parcels for 7-Foodmart are both multi-family structures. The PUDR includes the following updates: 1. Increase the maximum square feet of gross floor area to 15,000 square feet from the existing permitted 10,000 square feet; 2. Update the legal description and PUD acreage; 3. Update the Development Standards Table to clarify that the cooler addition, constructed on the east side of the existing building, shall be allowed to be setback a minimum of 12.2’ from Tropical Way; 4. Retain existing Deviations for the expansion properties; 5. Addition of Deviation #5, seeking to permit a total of 16 parking spaces along the alley, Tropical Way, for the use of public and employee parking. This exceeds the code maximum by 6 spaces but is still under the 30% maximum of required parking; 6. Addition of Deviation #6, seeking to allow a 12.5’ encroachment of impervious area, for a distance of 86.3’, within the 15’ Type ‘B’ Buffer along Tropical Way if compensating landscape areas ae provided within the same buffer; 7. Amend the Native Tree Preservation Requirement, to include the addition of 4 trees within the preservation requirement, as a result of the expansion properties (for a total of 8 trees to be preserved on-site); 8. Amend Transportation Commitment #1 to remove language prohibiting tractor-trailers from making deliveries and addition of language requiring that a loading space be constructed to accommodate deliveries made by tractor-trailers; 9. Eliminate Transportation Commitments #2 and #3, as they no longer apply; 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 263 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 7-FOODMART PUDR – PL20190000683 Deviation Justifications November 14, 2019 2 10. Amend Transportation Commitment #5 to reflect the updated maximum trip generation allowed by the proposed use; 11. Removal of the Schedule of Development/Monitoring Report and Sunset Provision section; 12. Addition of the PUD Monitoring Section, using current language requested by County Staff; 13. Addition of Exhibit G – “Encroachment Exhibit” as a supplement to Deviation #6; 14. Updates to the PUD Master Plan. Aerial location map 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 264 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 7-FOODMART PUDR – PL20190000683 Deviation Justifications November 14, 2019 3 EVALUATION CRITERIA a. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. Response: The subject property is located within the Santa Barbara Commercial Overlay District, which was created to provide the surrounding area and passerby traffic with commercial development. Aggregation of lots is also encouraged within the Overlay. The intent of the 7-Foodmart PUDR, is to expand the existing PUD boundary, with the addition of 3 bordering lots. The PUDR will allow for a proposed expansion of the existing locally owned food market and further allow the expansion of the existing parking lot. No additional access points are proposed along Santa Barbara Boulevard, to lessen traffic flow interruptions along this roadway corridor. Existing utilities (water, septic/drain field) and water management areas will be redesigned, as needed, to support the proposed expansion. b. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the county attorney. Response: The subject property is owned by Kelvin and Anand Deonarine. Please refer to the Covenant of Unified Control. c. Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives and policies of the Growth Management Plan. (This is to include identifying what Sub-district, policy or other provision allows the requested uses/density, and fully explaining/addressing all criteria or conditions of that Sub-district, policy or other provision.) Response: The subject property is located within the Golden Gate Area Master Plan, which was adopted as part of the County’s Comprehensive Plan in 1991. 7-Foodmart is more specially located within the Santa Barbara Commercial Subdistrict of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan. The PUDR, as proposed, conforms with the goals, objectives and policies outlined in the Comprehensive Plan. 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 265 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 7-FOODMART PUDR – PL20190000683 Deviation Justifications November 14, 2019 4 d. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. Response: The proposed expansion of the 7-Foodmart PUD will continue to permit commercial development within an area of the County that is intended for commercial growth, as per Collier County Growth Management Plan. The site will continue to provide sufficient buffering and screening to adjacent residential development. The list of permitted uses are compatible with the surrounding area. Further, commercial uses that are specifically not compatible have been identified as prohibited uses within the PUD document. e. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. Response: The PUD currently meets the 30% open space requirement and will continue to meet this requirement as the future expansion occurs. f. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. Response: Both public and private facilities are available to serve the existing project and future expansion. g. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. Response: The intent of this PUDR request is for the addition of ±1.09 acres of developable land (Lots 5, 6 and 10 of the Golden Gate Unit 6-Block 189 Plat) into the existing 7-Foodmart PUD, which will accommodate the future expansion of the site. Commercial growth is anticipated within the surrounding area of the Santa Barbara Commercial Overlay District. h. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications of justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. Response: The proposed PUD Rezone complies with all applicable regulations set forth within the existing CPUD Ordinance and the Collier County Land Development Code. 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 266 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) PROJECT: NOTES: EXHIBIT DESC:PLANNING DEPT4365 RADIO ROADSUITE 201NAPLES, FL 34104P: 239-434-6060F: 239-434-6084 CLIENT: LOCATION:SANTA BARBARA BLVDALLEY55TH TER SW55TH ST SW54TH TER SW22ND PL S W 23RD AVE SW 54TH TER SWCORONADO PKY 53RD ST SW54TH ST SW24TH AVE SW 23RD CT SW 23RD PL S W STAR GRASS LN ¯ Z:\Active Projects\S\7-Foodmart (Santa Barbara Rezone) 13-0063\GIS\2019-04-02 7FM - LOCATION MAP.mxd Date Saved: 4/2/2019 0 400200Feet 7-FOODMART 2332 SANTA BAR BARA BLVD LOCATION MAP SUBJECT PROPERTI ES ANAND DEON ARINE & KELVIN DEONAR INE Source: Collier County Geographic Information Systems 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 267 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 268 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 269 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 270 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) TROPICAL WAY (ALLEY)15.0' TYPE "B"LANDSCAPE BUFFER15.0' TYPE "B"LANDSCAPE BUFFER15.00' SIDE YARDSETBACK25.00' FRONT YARD SETBACK 15.0' TYPE "B" LANDSCAPE BUFFER 10.0' TYPE "D" LANDSCAPE BUFFER ZONING: RMF-6-SBCO LAND USE: MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING: RMF-6-SBCO LAND USE: MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING: RMF-6-SBCO LAND USE: SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING: RMF-6-SBCO LAND USE: MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING: E-ESTATES LAND USE: SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIALZONING: E-ESTATES LAND USE: SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING: E-ESTATES LAND USE: SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 6.0' DRAINAGE AND PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT (PLAT BOOK 5 PAGES 124-134)15.00' SIDE YARDSETBACKCONCEPTUAL WATERMANAGEMENT LOCATION5.0' TYPE "B" LANDSCAPE BUFFER EXISTING BUILDING 6,754 SF PROPOSED BUILDING EXPANSION ±8,000 SF 15.00' REAR YARD SETBACK 6' WALL ZONING: RMF-12-SBCOLAND USE: MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIALZONING: RMF-12-SBCOLAND USE: MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL6' WIDE SIDEWALK ZONING: RMF-6-SBCO LAND USE: MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING: RMF-6-SBCO LAND USE: MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING: RMF-6-SBCO LAND USE: MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING: RMF-6-SBCOLAND USE: MULTI-FAMILYRESIDENTIALZONING: RMF-6-SBCO LAND USE: MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING: RMF-6-SBCO LAND USE: MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING: E-ESTATES LAND USE: SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING: E-ESTATESLAND USE: SINGLE-FAMILYRESIDENTIAL7 PROPOSED PARKING SPACES 6' WALL EXISTING 6' WALL EXISTING DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE LOADING BAY4 PROPOSED PARKING SPACES 1 PROPOSED PARKING SPACE 4 EXISTING PARKING SPACES CONCEPTUAL DRAINFIELD LOCATIONCONCEPTUAL WATER MANAGEMENT LOCATION SANTA BARBARA BOULEVARD (PUBLIC ROW)L.B.L.B.L.B.L.B.L.B.L.B.L.B. L.B.L.B.L.B.L.B. L.B.L.B.L.B.L.B.L.B.L.B.L.B.L.B.L.B.L.B.L.B.L.B.L.B.L.B.L.B.L.B.L.B.6' WIDE SIDEWALK STARGRASS LANESHEET NO: PLANNING DEPARTMENT 4365 Radio Road, Suite 201 Naples, Florida 34104 P: 239.434.6060 F: 239.434.6084 Company Cert. of Authorization No. 00009496 7-FOODMART CPUD EXHIBIT C: CONCEPTUAL MASTER PLAN PAGE 1 OF 2 N CURRENT ZONING:7-FOODMART CPUD AND RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILY SANTA BARBARA COMMERCIAL OVERLAY (RMF-12-SBC0) PROPOSED ZONING:COMMERCIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT- SANTA BARBARA COMMERCIAL OVERLAY(CPUD-SBCO) CURRENT LAND USE:DEVELOPED COMMERCIAL AND UNDEVELOPED / VACANT FUTURE LAND USE:SANTA BARBARA COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT COMMERCIAL:MAXIMUM 15,000 SF PLANNING NOTES: LAND USE SUMMARY ACRES % OF SITEUSE ± 1.01 ± 0.38 ± 0.12 47.6 17.9 OPEN SPACE SUMMARY 5.7 PROPOSED TRACT, LOT OR LAND-USE BOUNDARIES OR SPECIAL LAND USE BOUNDARIES SHALL NOT BE CONSTRUED TO BE FINAL AND MAY BE VARIED AT ANY SUBSEQUENT APPROVAL PHASE, SUCH AS FINAL PLATTING OR SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPLICATION. GENERAL NOTES: REQUIRED: 8 TREES PROVIDED: 8 TREES IN ACCORDANCE WITH LDC SECTION 3.05.07 AND EXHIBIT F OF THE PUD DOCUMENT NATIVE TREE PRESERVATION: PERIMETER BUFFERS ± 0.43 20.3 CIRCULATION DRIVE AISLES DEVELOPABLE AREA CONCEPTUAL WATER MANAGEMENT LOCATION REQUIRED OPEN SPACE (2.12 AC X 30% = 0.64 AC) *USABLE OPEN SPACE LOCATIONS WILL BE DETERMINED AT TIME OF SDP PERMITTING. ± 0.14 6.6CONCEPTUAL DRAINFIELD LOCATION LEGEND LANDSCAPE BUFFER COMPENSATING AREA COMPENSATING ROW AREA TOTAL SITE AREA ± 2.12 100 COMPENSATING ROW ± 0.04 1.9 1 3 4 5 2 2 5 6 6 6 5 REV. PER CC RAI COMMENTS - 7/15/20191. REV. PER CC RAI COMMENTS - 9/20/20192. REVISIONS REV. PER CC RAI COMMENTS - 12/17/20193. 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 271 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) SHEET NO: PLANNING DEPARTMENT 4365 Radio Road, Suite 201 Naples, Florida 34104 P: 239.434.6060 F: 239.434.6084 Company Cert. of Authorization No. 00009496 7-FOODMART CPUD EXHIBIT C: MASTER CONCEPT PLAN PAGE 2 OF 2 DEVIATIONS: 1.DEVIATION #1 SEEKS RELIEF FROM LDC SECTION 5.05.08 C.9.B., “FREESTANDING BUILDING WITHIN A PUD,” WHICH REQUIRES ALL FAÇADES FOR FREESTANDING STRUCTURES WITHIN A PUD TO BE TREATED AS A PRIMARY FAÇADE, EXCEPT FOR SECONDARY FACADES, TO REQUIRE ONLY THE FAÇADE FACING SANTA BARBARA BOULEVARD TO BE TREATED AS A PRIMARY FAÇADE. 2.DEVIATION #2 SEEKS RELIEF FROM LDC SECTION 5.03.02 H., “WALL REQUIREMENT BETWEEN RESIDENTIAL AND NON-RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT,” WHICH REQUIRES A MASONRY WALL, CONCRETE OR PRE-FABRICATED CONCRETE WALL AND/OR FENCE TO BE CONSTRUCTED ON A NON-RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY WHEN IT LIES CONTIGUOUS TO OR OPPOSITE A RESIDENTIALLY ZONED DISTRICT, TO INSTEAD ALLOW A TYPE “B” BUFFER INCLUSIVE OF A 6-FOOT HIGH HEDGE CONSISTENT WITH LDC SECTION 4.06.02 C.2. WHERE RESIDENTIAL ZONING OCCURS ON THE NORTH AND SOUTH PERIMETER BOUNDARIES OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. 3.DEVIATION #3 SEEKS RELIEF FROM LDC SECTION 4.06.02 C.4., “ALTERNATIVE D LANDSCAPE BUFFER,” WHICH REQUIRES A 15-FOOT WIDE TYPE “D” LANDSCAPE BUFFER WHEN THE ULTIMATE RIGHT-OF-WAY IS 100 OR MORE FEET, TO INSTEAD PROVIDE A 10-FOOT WIDE TYPE “D” BUFFER ALONG SANTA BARBARA BOULEVARD. 4.DEVIATION #4 SEEKS RELIEF FROM LDC SECTION 4.06.02 C.2., “ALTERNATIVE B LANDSCAPE BUFFER”, AS WELL AS LDC SECTION 5.03.04 A.2., SPECIFYING DUMPSTER ENCLOSURES NOT TO ENCROACH INTO THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE BUFFER AREA, TO INSTEAD ALLOW THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE TO BE LOCATED AS SHOWN ON THE MCP AND TO PROVIDE A 5-FOOT WIDE BUFFER WITH THE SAME PLANTING MATERIALS REQUIRED OF A TYPE 'B' BUFFER ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE, AS ALSO SHOWN ON THE MASTER PLAN. 5.DEVIATION #5 SEEKS RELIEF FROM LDC SECTION 4.05.02 E.4., PARKING ACCESS STANDARDS, WHICH ALLOWS “NONRESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WHICH ABUTS AN ALLEY, A MAXIMUM OF TEN PARKING SPACES, NOT TO EXCEED 30% OF THE REQUIRED PARKING…. MAY BE ACCESSED SOLELY FROM THE ALLEY”…..AND “THESE SPACES SHALL BE FOR THE EXCLUSIVE USE OF EMPLOYEES AND SERVICE VEHICLES,” TO INSTEAD ALLOW A TOTAL OF 16 PARKING SPACES (26.6% OF THE REQUIRED PARKING) TO BE ACCESSED FROM THE ALLEY, FOR THE USE OF PUBLIC AND EMPLOYEE PARKING. 6. DEVIATION #6 SEEKS RELIEF FROM LDC SECTION 4.06.02 D.4.C “SIDEWALKS AND IMPERVIOUS AREAS WITHIN LANDSCAPE BUFFERS,” WHICH PERMITS A 5' ENCROACHMENT OF IMPERVIOUS AREA WITHIN A 15' TYPE 'B' BUFFER, TO INSTEAD ALLOW A 12.5' ENCROACHMENT FOR A DISTANCE OF 86.3' WITHIN THE 15' TYPE 'B' BUFFER ALONG TROPICAL WAY. COMPENSATING LANDSCAPE AREA SHALL BE PROVIDE ALONG THE SAME BUFFER. REFER TO EXHIBIT G. REV. PER CC RAI COMMENTS - 7/15/20191. REV. PER CC RAI COMMENTS - 9/20/20192. REVISIONS REV. PER CC RAI COMMENTS - 12/17/20193. 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 272 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.fPacket Pg. 273Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 7-FOODMART PUDR – PL20190000683 Deviation Justifications December 17, 2019 1 7-FOODMART CPUD DEVIATION JUSTIFICATIONS 1. Deviation #1 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.05.08 C.9.b., “Freestanding Building within a PUD,” which requires all façades for freestanding structures within a PUD to be treated as a primary façade, except for secondary facades, to require only the façade facing Santa Barbara Boulevard to be treated as a primary façade. Justification: The current PUD Ordinance permits the above deviation for the existing building on-site; therefore, it is being requested that the proposed future building expansion be permitted to also provide one primary façade, along Santa Barbara Blvd. The only major roadway that the project is visible from is Santa Barbara Boulevard (along the west) and the required perimeter landscape buffers, wall and plantings sufficiently screen the site on all other sides. 2. Deviation #2 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.03.02 H., “Wall Requirement between Residential and Non-residential Development,” which requires a masonry wall, concrete or pre-fabricated concrete wall and/or fence to be constructed on a non-residential property when it lies contiguous to or opposite a residentially zoned district, to instead allow a Type “B” buffer inclusive of a 6-foot high hedge consistent with LDC section 4.06.02 C.2. where residential zoning occurs on the north and south perimeter boundaries of the subject property. Justification: The current PUD Ordinance permits the above deviation, allowing a Type B Landscape Buffer, inclusive of a 6’ hedge, along the existing north and south perimeter boundaries; consequently, the same deviation is being requested for the proposed expansion. This will apply to the new north and south perimeter boundaries that are a result of the addition of Lots 5,6 and 10 of the Golden Gate Unit 6-Block 189 Plat. Per LDC Section 2.03.07 H. 1. “Santa Barbara Commercial Overlay District”, existing residential uses, other than owner-occupied dwellings, are required to cease to exist within a specified time period. The intent of the Santa Barbara Commercial Overlay District is to eliminate residential development to create a commercially developed area. In addition, new residential development is not permitted within the Overlay. Therefore, the construction of a wall adjacent to the existing multi-family residential units to the north and south seems unnecessary and the 6’ high hedge will provide sufficient screening from the site. 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 274 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 7-FOODMART PUDR – PL20190000683 Deviation Justifications December 17, 2019 2 3. Deviation #3 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.06.02 C.4., “Alternative D Landscape Buffer,” which requires a 15-foot wide Type “D” landscape buffer when the ultimate right-of-way is 100 or more feet, to instead provide a 10-foot wide Type “D” buffer along Santa Barbara Boulevard. Justification: The current PUD permits the above deviation, thus the request is for the expansion parcels. Due to the shallow depth of the project, the provision of a 15’ wide landscape buffer would diminish developable area and circulation of the proposed development. The request for a reduction of 5’ in the landscape buffer along Santa Barbara Blvd does not result in any negative impacts to the community. Lastly, the alternative 10’ landscape buffer being requested will consist of the same plant material and spacing requirements per the LDC for a Type D buffer. 4. Deviation #4 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.06.02 C.2, “Alternative Landscape Buffer,” as well as LDC Section 5.03.04 A.2, specifying dumpster enclosures not to encroach into the required landscape buffer area, to instead allow the dumpster enclosure to be located as shown on the MPC and to provide a 5-foot wide buffer with the same planting materials required of a Type “B” buffer on the west side of the dumpster enclosure, as also shown on the Master Plan. Justification: Deviation #4 was approved with the existing PUD and is to remain with no requested changes. The proposed expansion does not affect this previously approved deviation. 5. Deviation #5 seeks relief from LDC section 4.05.02 E.4., Parking Access Standards, which allows “nonresidential development which abuts an alley, a maximum of ten parking spaces, not to exceed 30% of the required parking…. may be accessed solely from the alley”…..and “these spaces shall be for the exclusive use of employees and service vehicles,” to instead allow a total of 16 parking spaces (26.6% of the required parking) to be accessed from the alley, for the use of public and employee parking. Justification: This deviation is requesting to allow a total of 16 spaces to be accessed from Tropical Way, which is 6 spaces more than what is currently permitted by the LDC (the LDC permits a maximum of 10 spaces). The 16 spaces being requested is still below the 30% maximum, also required within LDC Section 4.05.02 E.4. During peak hours for the existing business, parking can be problematic; therefore, maximizing parking for the development will promote public safety. 6. Deviation #6 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.06.02 D.4.c “Sidewalks and Impervious Areas Within Landscape Buffers,” which permits a 5’ encroachment of impervious area within a 15’ Type ‘B’ buffer, to instead allow a 12.5’ encroachment for a distance of 86.3’ within the 15’ Type ‘B’ buffer along Tropical Way. Compensating landscape area shall be provide along the same buffer. Refer to Exhibit G. 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 275 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 7-FOODMART PUDR – PL20190000683 Deviation Justifications December 17, 2019 3 Justification: Due to the shallow depth of the property and required infrastructure to accommodate the site, developable area is very limited. All required plant material will be installed, as required, along the same boundary; therefore, there will be no decrease in the plant material being provided within the 15’ Type B buffer along Tropical Way. 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 276 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 277 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 278 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 279 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 280 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 281 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 282 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 283 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 284 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 285 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 286 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 287 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.fPacket Pg. 288Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.fPacket Pg. 289Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.fPacket Pg. 290Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 291 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 292 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 293 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 294 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 295 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 296 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 297 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 298 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 299 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 300 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 301 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 302 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 303 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 304 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 305 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 306 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 307 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 308 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 309 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 310 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 311 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.fPacket Pg. 312Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 313 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 314 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 315 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.fPacket Pg. 316Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.fPacket Pg. 317Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 318 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 319 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.fPacket Pg. 320Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 321 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 322 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 323 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 324 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 325 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 326 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 327 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 328 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 329 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 330 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 331 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 332 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 333 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 334 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.fPacket Pg. 335Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 336 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 337 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 338 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 339 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 340 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 341 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 342 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 343 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 344 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 7 FOOD MART Environmental Data for PUDR SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Prepared For: Prepared By: August 20, 2019 Collier County Growth Management Division 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Earth Tech Environmental, LLC 10600 Jolea Avenue Bonita Springs, FL 34135 239.304.0030 www.eteflorida.com 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 345 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) Environmental Data for PUDR Earth Tech Environmental, LLC www.eteflorida.com APPENDICES APPENDIX A: FLUCCS Map APPENDIX B: Native Tree Count APPENDIX C: Earth Tech Environmental Staff Qualifications 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 346 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) Environmental Data for PUDR Earth Tech Environmental, LLC www.eteflorida.com INTRODUCTION The following document is meant is outline the Project’s consistency with the applicable objectives and policies in the CCME of the GMP (Policy 6.1.1 Objective 7.1). CCME GOAL 6: TO IDENTIFY, PROTECT, CONSERVE AND APPROPRIATELY USE NATIVE VEGETATIVE COMMUNITIES AND WILDLIFE HABITAT. Policy 6.1.1: Protect native vegetative communities through the application of minimum preservation requirements. (The Policies under this Objective apply to all of Collier County except for that portion of the County which is identified on the Countywide Future Land Use Map (FLUM) as the Rural Lands Stewardship Area Overlay.)… The parcels being added to the PUD we legally cleared in the past, leaving only canopy trees with a mowed\maintained understory. Based on the size of the parcels and the type of habitat, a tree count is required by the LDC. 10% of the existing trees on the property that meet LDC requirements are required to be preserved. A FLUCCS map for the additional parcel is included in Appendix A. A tree count is included in Appendix B. The tree preservation requirements calculation is as follows: 34 existing trees x 10% = 3.4 or (4) trees to be preserved. No wetlands are present on the property so Objective 6.2 and Policy 6.2.1 are Not Applicable. CCME GOAL 7: TO PROTECT AND CONSERVE THE COUNTY’S FISHERIES AND WILDLIFE. OBJECTIVE 7.1: The County shall direct incompatible land uses away from listed animal species and their habitats… Due to the parcels size and surrounding development, a protected species survey was deemed unnecessary, however during the tree count survey, ecologists looked for any signs of listed species onsite. No listed species have been identified on the Subject Property. 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 347 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) Environmental Data for PUDR Earth Tech Environmental, LLC www.eteflorida.com APPENDIX A FLUCCS MAP 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 348 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 7 FoodmartCollier County, Florida AS SH OW NN/A FLUCCS Mapping SHEET NO. DATE PROJECT NO. SCALE E A R T H T E C H E N V I R O N M E N T A L , L L CEARTH T E C H E N V I R O N M E N T A L , L L C 1 0 6 0 0 J O L E A A V E N U E10600 J O L E A A V E N U E B O N I T A S P R I N G S , F L O R I D A 3 4 1 3 5BONITA S P R I N G S , F L O R I D A 3 4 1 3 5 P H O N E (2 3 9 ) 3 0 4 -0 0 3 0 F A X (2 3 9 ) 3 2 4 -0 0 5 4PHONE (2 3 9 ) 3 0 4 -0 0 3 0 F A X (2 3 9 ) 3 2 4 -0 0 5 4 W W W .E T E F L O R I D A .C O MWWW.E T E F L O R I D A .C O M 141 191 191 SANTA BARBARA BLVDALLEY55TH TER SWSANTA BARBARA BLVDSTAR GRASS LN 100 0 10050 Feet Subject ParcelsFLUCCS M APPIN G 141, Retail & Services (Foodmart) 191, Undeveloped Land in Urban Area 7/26/19G:\ETEnv Documents\PROJECTS\COLLIER\7 Foodmart Parcel\GIS\fluccs mapping.mxd / 11:41:37 AMO Notes: 1. 2019 Aerial & Subject Property obtained from the Collier County Property Appraiser. 2. Tree survey fieldwork conducted on 4/23/19. 3. Cabbage palms with trunks greater than 6 feet tall were counted as part of this survey. 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 349 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) Environmental Data for PUDR Earth Tech Environmental, LLC www.eteflorida.com APPENDIX B TREE COUNT 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 350 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 7 FoodmartCollier County, Florida AS SHOWNN/A Native Tree Survey SHEET NO. DATE PROJECT NO. SCALE E A R T H T E C H E N V I R O N M E N T A L , L L CEARTH T E C H E N V I R O N M E N T A L , L L C 1 0 6 0 0 J O L E A A V E N U E10600 J O L E A A V E N U E B O N I T A S P R I N G S , F L O R I D A 3 4 1 3 5BONITA S P R I N G S , F L O R I D A 3 4 1 3 5 P H O N E (2 3 9 ) 3 0 4 -0 0 3 0 F A X (2 3 9 ) 3 2 4 -0 0 5 4PHONE (2 3 9 ) 3 0 4 -0 0 3 0 F A X (2 3 9 ) 3 2 4 -0 0 5 4 W W W .E T E F L O R I D A .C O MWWW.E T E F L O R I D A .C O M . . . .. .. .... .... ..... . . . .. .... . . . . .SANTA BARBARA BLVD100 0 10050 Feet Subject ParcelsTree Species .cabbage palm (14) .slash pine (20) Existing 7 Foodmart 8/20/19G:\ETEnv Documents\PROJECTS\COLLIER\7 Foodmart Parcel\GIS\Updated Tree Survey.mxd / 11:24:27 AMO Notes: 1. 2019 Aerial & Subject Property obtained from the Collier County Property Appraiser. 2. Tree survey fieldwork conducted on 4/23/19 and was updated on 8/20/19. 3. Cabbage palms with trunks greater than 8 feet tall werecounted as part of this survey. . . .. .. .... ... . .. . .. . . . . . . ... . . . . . . North Parcel (Zoom) South Parcels (Zoom) Overview (Zoom) 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 351 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) #species size 1 cabbage palm >8 foot trunk 2 cabbage palm >8 foot trunk 3 cabbage palm >8 foot trunk 4 cabbage palm >8 foot trunk 5 cabbage palm >8 foot trunk 6 cabbage palm >8 foot trunk 7 cabbage palm >8 foot trunk 8 cabbage palm >8 foot trunk 9 cabbage palm >8 foot trunk 10 cabbage palm >8 foot trunk 11 cabbage palm >8 foot trunk 12 cabbage palm >8 foot trunk 13 cabbage palm >8 foot trunk 14 cabbage palm >8 foot trunk 15 slash pine 15.3 16 slash pine 15.3 17 slash pine 10.8 18 slash pine 13.4 19 slash pine 10.8 20 slash pine 13.8 21 slash pine 9.2 22 slash pine 14.4 23 slash pine 12.6 24 slash pine 10 25 slash pine 10 26 slash pine 15.7 27 slash pine 12.8 28 slash pine 9.2 29 slash pine 9.6 30 slash pine 11.4 31 slash pine 22 32 slash pine 15.8 33 slash pine 13.6 34 slash pine 14.8 Native Tree Count 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 352 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) Environmental Data for PUDR Earth Tech Environmental, LLC www.eteflorida.com APPENDIX C ETE STAFF QUALIFICATIONS 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 353 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 239.304.0030 | www.eteflorida.com Ea r t h Tech Environmental, LLC www.etenviron.com Relevant Experience Jeremy has been an environmental consultant in Southwest Florida since 1994 and has worked on projects throughout Collier, Lee, Hendry, DeSoto, Glades, and Charlotte counties. His varied experience spans marine, upland, and estuarine habitats and includes extensive work with a wide variety of listed species. In addition to authoring dozens of habitat and species management plans, in 2007, Jeremy co- authored the first habitat conservation plan (HCP) in the nation to address incidental take issues for both red cockaded woodpeckers (RCW) and Florida panther on the same property. In 1998, he wrote an ecological assessment computer model for the South Florida Water Management District as part of the South Lee County Watershed Study. Early in his career, Jeremy was the principal investigator of a field research project in the Bahamas that utilized telemetry tracking to study the swimming speed of sub-adult lemon sharks. Jeremy’s environmental consulting experience includes: Protected Species Surveys Environmental Resource Permitting (ERP) Listed Species Management Plans Turbidity Monitoring Vegetation & Habitat Mapping Wetland & Water Level Monitoring USFWS Section 7 & Section 10 Permitting Environmental Impact Statements (EIS) Water Use Monitoring & Compliance Project Management Preserve Management Plans GIS / GPS Mapping & Exhibits Post Permit Compliance Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessments Environmental Land Use Planning Phase II Environmental Site Assessments Native Vegetation Restoration Plans Lake Management Plans Incidental Take Permitting Due Diligence Reports Site and Aerial Photography Wetland Jurisdictional Determinations USFWS Bald Eagle Monitor Bonneted Bat Surveys Gopher Tortoise Surveys, Permitting, & Relocations Mangrove Assessments & Restorations Scrub Jay Surveys Hard Bottom & Soft Bottom Benthic Surveys Burrowing Owl Surveys Artificial Reef Deployments Shorebird Surveys Seagrass Surveys Certifications/Credentials Certified Environmental Professional #1692037, Academy of Board Certified Environmental Professionals Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Authorized Gopher Tortoise Agent – Permit No. GTA-09-00192 Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Burrowing Owl Registered Agent –No. RAG- 18-00080 Florida Association of Environmental Professionals – member since January 1995; served on the Board of Directors for the Southwest Florida Chapter from (2008 – 2012). Past Secretary, Vice President, & President. State of Florida Real Estate License (2003 to Present) Appointed by the Collier County Board of County Commissioners to: • Conservation Collier Land Acquisition Advisory Committee, Chairman of the Lands Evaluation and Management Subcommittee. (2009 to 2014). • Collier County Development Services Advisory Committee (DSAC) (2015 to Present). • FWC Local Rule Review Committee (Manatee Protection Speed Zones) (2016). Publications Sundström, L.F., J. Sterk, & S.H. Gruber. 1998. Effects of a speed-sensing transmitter on the swimming speed of lemon sharks. Bahamas J. Sci. 6 (1): 12-22. JEREMY STERK, C.E.P. Partner \ Principal Ecologist jeremys@eteflorida.com 239.595.4929 Years Experience 25 years Education/Training B.S. Aquatic Biology (1994), St. Cloud State University Professional Affiliations Academy of Board Certified Environmental Professionals #16992037 Florida Association of Environmental Professionals 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 354 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 355 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 356 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 4365 Radio Road • Suite 201 • Naples, FL 34104 • P: 239.434.6060 • www.davidsonengineering.com D esigningE xcellence Civil Engineering • Planning • Permitting M E M O R A N D U M January 31, 2020 TO: Nancy Gundlach, AICP, PLA FROM: Jessica Harrelson, AICP, Senior Planner RE: 7-Foodmart PUDR-PL20190000683 Neighborhood Information Meeting Summary Davidson Engineering conducted a Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) for the subject 7-Foomdart PUDR Application on Thursday, January 23rd, 2020 at 5:30 p.m. The meeting was held at the Golden Gate Community Center, located at 4701 Golden Gate Parkway, Naples, FL 34116. Jessica Harrelson, AICP, with Davidson Engineering, was in attendance to represent the Applicants. The sign-in sheet, attached, indicates that 1 individual from the public was in attendance, along with Nancy Gundlach with Collier County. Copies of the draft PUD Document were available at the meeting. Jessica Harrelson, Agent for the Applicants, conducted the meeting and gave an overview of the proposed project. A copy of the PowerPoint presentation is attached for reference. Following the presentation, the attendee was asked for questions or comments. The following list is a summary of questions asked and responses given by the agent in bold. 1. Is the building doubling in size? Response: The request is to increase the maximum gross floor area square footage from 10,000 SF to 15,000 SF. The existing building is just under 7,000 SF, so yes, the request is for a maximum 15,000 SF. 2. Where will the parking spaces in the alley be? Response: Jessica uses the PowerPoint slide, depicting the spaces along the alley, to show the locations. 3. Will the parking spaces be parallel to Santa Barbara? Response: Yes. 4. Will there be landscaping along the north property line (note: the attendee owns the duplex abutting 7-Foodmart along the north)? Response: Yes, a 15’ Type B buffer, with a 6’ hedge is required at that location. Nancy further explains that trees are planted 25’ on center. 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 357 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 7-Foodmart – PUDR-PL20190000683 January 31, 2020 2 5. Where is the additional 7,500 SF going? Response: Yes, the expansion is proposed going south. Jessica uses site plan to show the location. 6. You are setting up the alleyway is the access to the store? Response: Jessica responded that the LDC limits to the amount of access points along Santa Barbara. It is further explained that there is a lot of stop and go traffic on Santa Barbara, creating issues, that a turn lane is being constructed as well to alleviate some of the traffic congestion that is currently being experienced. 7. How will the turn lane work? Response: It’s a north-bound turn lane, 240’, and you can turn directly into the site. 8. Will the turn lane stop in front of the store, or continue in front of “my” property? Response: Jessica uses the site plan to show the location of the turn lane and property line. 9. The attendee brings up the “poor” trees that are existing within the north landscape buffer and lack of 6’ hedge (hedge is not tight). Response: Jessica replied that if landscaping is not installed per Code requirements and what is outlined in the PUD, the County will not approve it at inspection. 10. You are going to reduce congestion on Santa Barbara and moving it to the back? Response: We are also adding a turn lane. 11. Do the trucks (delivery trucks) have access the alley from Coronado or only from 22nd? Response: Jessica responded that it is her understanding that trucks can use both access points for deliveries. 12. Do you know which access the use most? Response: Jessica responded she was not certain. 13. What is “my” setback from the alley? Response: Jessica stated she was uncertain but I can look that up and get it back to you. End of memo. 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 358 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) PUDR-PL20190000683 7-Foodmart CPUD AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLIANCE I hereby certify that pursuant to Ordinance 2004-41, of the Collier County Land Development Code, I did cause the attached newspaper advertisement to appear and I did give notice by mail to the following property owners and/or condominium and civic associations whose members may be affected by the proposed land use changes of an application request for a Planned Unit Development Rezone and Growth Management Plan Amendment, at least 15 days prior to the scheduled Neighborhood Information Meeting. For the purposes of this requirement, the names and addresses of property owners shall be deemed those appearing on the latest tax rolls of Collier County and any other persons or entities who have made a formal request of the county to be notified. The said notice contained the laymen’s description of the site property of proposed change and the date, time, and place of a Neighborhood Information Meeting. Per the attached letters, property owner’s list, and copy of newspaper advertisement which are hereby made a part of this Affidavit of Compliance _________________________________________________ Jessica Harrelson, AICP State of Florida County of Collier The foregoing Affidavit of compliance was acknowledged before me this _19th_ day of _December_______, 2019 by Jessica Harrelson, who is personally known to me. _____________________________________________ (Signature of Notary Public) (Notary Seal) Tocia Hamlin__________________________________ Printed Name of Notary 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 359 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 360 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 361 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 55TH TER RENTAL LLC PO BOX 9684 NAPLES, FL 34101---0 ACOSTA, ANTHONY YENEY SUAREZ 2401 55TH ST SW NAPLES, FL 34116---0 AGUILERA, TONY & CARIDAD 1461 22ND AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---3498 ALEMAN, BETHANIA J RICARDO ALEMAN 2295 55TH TER SW NAPLES, FL 34116---5562 ALFONSO, JORGE DELGADO 2365 55TH TER SW APT A NAPLES, FL 34116---5633 ALZAMORA, MELECIO ZORAIDA GARCIA 2379 55TH ST SW NAPLES, FL 34116---5519 BARRABI, EDUARDO ANTONIO SIVELIS ELENA MARRERO PADILLA 2381 55TH TER SW NAPLES, FL 34116---0 BERNARD, JOHN BRUCE III LESLIE ANNE BERNARD 161 1ST ST BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134---0 CARPER, KENNETH & CAROL 5630 STAR GRASS LN NAPLES, FL 34116---6727 CARRERA, SUSANO GONZALEZ ALMA DELIA GARCIA PEREZ 2401 55TH TER SW NAPLES, FL 34120---0 CASANAS, OLGA LIDIA 5500 22ND PL SW NAPLES, FL 34116---5551 CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF VENICE INC 2210 SANTA BARBARA BLVD NAPLES, FL 34116---5439 CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF VENICE INC 1000 PINEBROOK RD VENICE, FL 34285---6426 CHALLENGER, JAZER 5255 TALLWOOD WAY NAPLES, FL 34116---0 CHISMA LLC 7960 PRESERVE CIR #627 NAPLES, FL 34119---0 CLARKE, RODNEY D & SUZANNE L 5621 STAR GRASS LN NAPLES, FL 34116---6734 CLERGE, DAVIDSON MARIE BERLINE ST CYR 2300 55TH TER SW #B NAPLES, FL 34116---0 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112---0 COMMUNITY ASSISTED AND SUPPORTED LIVING INC 1401 16TH ST SARASOTA, FL 34236---0 CORDOVES, OSMANI DENIS 2347 55TH ST SW NAPLES, FL 34116---0 CRUZ-SUAREZ, ADAYS R RAIZA GARCIA MARTINEZ 2323 55TH ST SW NAPLES, FL 34116---0 DEONARINE, ANAND KELVIN DEONARINE 2332 SANTA BARBARA BLVD NAPLES, FL 34116---0 DEONARINE, ANAND KEVIN DEONARINE 2332 SANTA BARBARA BLVD NAPLES, FL 34116---0 DEONARINE, KELVIN ANAND DEONARINE 1600 40TH TERR SW NAPLES, FL 34116---0 DEONARINE, KELVIN ANAND DEONARINE 2332 SANTA BARBARA BLVD NAPLES, FL 34116---0 DICKERSON, DENNIS K & MONICA L 361 31ST ST SW NAPLES, FL 34117---3105 DORIA, DOLORES ACOSTA 2223 55TH ST SW NAPLES, FL 34116---5517 DORSEY, JAMES O & CHERYL A 2255 SANTA BARBARA BLVD NAPLES, FL 34116---5437 ENGRACIO, JOSE L MARIA SANTANAJOSE DE JESUS ENGRACIOMARITZA BELTRAM 2349 55TH TER SW APT A NAPLES, FL 34116---5622 EVANS, BRIAN J 2355 SANTA BARBARA BLVD NAPLES, FL 34116---6731 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 362 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) FACCONE, MICHAEL A JOSEPH G FACCONE 579 95TH AVE N NAPLES, FL 34108---2452 FARO INTERNATIONAL GRP LLC 920 HONEYBEE DR NAPLES, FL 34120---4806 FERNANDEZ, SANDRA 2380 55TH TER SW NAPLES, FL 34116---0 FLORES-RIVERA, MARIA 2906 COCO LAKES DR NAPLES, FL 34105---0 FOLCH, LOUISE PO BOX 990084 NAPLES, FL 34116---0 FUQUEN, ALIRIO & GILMA E 757 CROSSFIELD CIR NAPLES, FL 34104---4758 IGLESIAS, LOURDES S & JORGE N 3350 SW 7TH ST MIAMI, FL 33135---0 JIMENEZ, JOSE 2387 55TH ST SW NAPLES, FL 34116---5519 JOHN & RHONDA HIGGINS TRUST 550 10TH ST N NAPLES, FL 34102---5638 LEDESMA, MINERVA VALENTE CASTILLO 5567 CORONADO PKWY NAPLES, FL 34116---5782 LEGUELINEL, FRANCK CARIDAD SANCHEZ-LEGUELINEL 844 PRESIDENT ST BROOKLYN, NY 11215---1406 LOPEZ, DAILY HECHAVARRIA BERTHA LOPEZ PARCHMENT 2295 55TH ST SW NAPLES, FL 34116---5553 M E & M J CURTIS REV TRUST 6560 BOTTLEBRUSH LANE NAPLES, FL 34109---0 MARONEY, PAUL J 2281 SANTA BARBARA BLVD NAPLES, FL 34116---5437 MORA, DAYRON YELINA GATO QUESADA 2271 55TH TER SW NAPLES, FL 34116---5562 MORALES, ELSA CATALINA HECTOR PALACIOS 2413 55TH TER SW NAPLES, FL 34116---5539 MORENO, KATIUSKA ALEXEI HECHAVARRIA 690 WILSON BLVD S NAPLES, FL 34117---0 NARANJO, MARISOL 2301 55TH ST SW NAPLES, FL 34116---0 NICAEA ACADEMY OF SW FL INC 14785 COLLIER BLVD NAPLES, FL 34119---9592 NIZ, DIANA M BRITTO DAVID GONZALEZ BRITO 2308 55TH TER SW NAPLES, FL 34116---0 ORTIZ, RAFAEL RODRIGUEZ 2355 55TH ST SW NAPLES, FL 34116---5519 PASSIDOMO, MICHAEL A 2475 SANTA BARBARA BLVD NAPLES, FL 34116---0 PASSIDOMO, MICHAEL A 2475 SANTA BARBARA BLVD NAPLES, FL 34116---6728 PERALTA, NORLAND PINTO SAILY ORERO VALDEZJOHANNA PINTO PERALTA 2223 55TH TER SW NAPLES, FL 34116---0 PEREYRA, F JAVIER SAUCEDO CALLE PEDRO BPRDA 1072 TORRE SOFER 3 APT 8D SANTA CRUZ BOLIVIA RAMOS, MARIA MAGDALENA 2371 55TH ST SW NAPLES, FL 34116---5519 REDEEMER CHRISTIAN CHURCH & ACADEMY INC (RCCA) PO BOX 4291 FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33310---0 REDEEMER CHRISTIAN CHURCH & ACADEMY INC (RCCA) 5100 31ST AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34116---0 REYES, DOMINIC F 2307 55TH TER S W NAPLES, FL 34116---0 RIVERON JR, SERAFIN & ZULINA 450 17TH ST NW NAPLES, FL 34120---0 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 363 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) RODRIGUEZ, DISNAY JEANNY A PEREZ 2339 55TH ST SW NAPLES, FL 34116---0 RODRIGUEZ, RAFAEL 2331 55TH ST SW NAPLES, FL 34116---0 SAINT-FLEUR, MARIUS & OLITHA 2395 55TH ST SW NAPLES, FL 34116---5519 SANTA BARBARA & 22ND PL LLC 1141 S 7TH ST SAINT LOUIS, MO 63104---0 SCHUMMER FAMILY JT REV TRUST 2455 SANTA BARBARA BLVD NAPLES, FL 34116---6728 SOMAR 1939 LLC 6761 BERWICK PL NAPLES, FL 34104---0 STATON II, RAYMOND W 4119 MOHAWK PL NAPLES, FL 34112---6745 TORRES, ANDREA GRACIELA TORRESHIDALBERTO DE LA TORRE 5523 22ND PL S W NAPLES, FL 34116---0 TRUPIANO, JOSEPH A & CONNIE 10542 WINTERVIEW DR NAPLES, FL 34109---1522 TRUPIANO, MARIO & MARY 125 HERITAGE WAY NAPLES, FL 34110---1376 TRUPIANO, VITO & DIANE 679 PINE CREST LN NAPLES, FL 34104---9519 TRUST NO 2315-55 PO BOX 186 LAKE WALES, FL 33850---0 UNIVERSAL PROP SVC OF NA LLC 475 15TH ST SW NAPLES, FL 34117---3335 VOLTAIRE, JEAN M & SHELLA 2307 55TH ST SW NAPLES, FL 34116---5519 WALKER, TERESE M 2413 55TH ST SW NAPLES, FL 34116---5521 Golden Gate Civic Association 4701 Golden Gate Parkway Naples, FL 34116 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 364 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 4365 Radio Road • Suite 201 • Naples, FL 34104 • P: 239.434.6060 • www.davidsonengineering.com D esigningE xcellence Civil Engineering • Planning • Permitting December 18, 2019 Dear Property Owner, The public is invited to attend a Neighborhood Information Meeting, held by Davidson Engineering, Inc. on: Thursday, January 23rd, 2020 at 5:30 p.m., at the Golden Gate Community Center, located at 4701 Golden Gate Parkway, Naples, FL 34116 The subject property is located on the east side of Santa Barbara Boulevard, north of Golden Gate Parkway, in Section 21, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, FL, consisting of 2.12-acres (see back for location map). A formal application has been submitted to Collier County seeking approval for the following: Planned Unit Development Rezone (PUDR-PL20190000683): to the 7-Foodmart Commercial Planned Unit Development (CPUD) to add 1.09-acres into the CPUD; to revise the legal description; to increase the commercial square footage from 10,000 square feet to 15,000 square feet; to update development standards; to add deviations pertaining to parking and landscape buffers; to update the native tree preservation requirement; to amend transportation developer commitments #1 and #5; to eliminate transportation developer commitments #2 and #3; to remove the schedule of development/monitoring report and sunset provision section; to add the PUD monitoring section; to add Exhibit G ‘Encroachment Exhibit’ to the PUD; and to update the Master Plan. Business and property owners, residents and visitors are welcome to attend the presentation and discuss the project with the owner/developer and Collier County staff. If you are unable to attend this meeting, but have questions or comments, they can be directed by mail, phone or e-mail to the individual below: Jessica Harrelson, AICP Davidson Engineering, Inc. 4365 Radio Road, Suite 201 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: 239-434-6060 Email: jessica@davidsonengineering.com 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 365 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 366 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 367 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) LOCATION 7-FOODMART 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 368 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) EXISTING PUD BOUNDARY 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 369 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) UPDATE MINIMUM BUILDING SETBACK FROM TROPICAL WAY ALLEY COOLER ADDITION 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 370 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) DEVIATIONS #1-4 TO REMAIN 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 371 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) ADDITION OF DEVIATION #5 4 PROPOSED SPACES 7 PROPOSED SPACES 4 EXISTING SPACES 1 PROPOSED SPACE 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 372 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) ADDITION OF DEVIATION #6 COMPENSATING LANDSCAPE AREA 12.5’ ENCROACHMENT INTO 15’ TYPE B BUFFER 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 373 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) DEVELOPER COMMITMENT -ENVIRONMENTAL 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 374 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) DEVELOPER COMMITMENT -TRANSPORTATION LOADING SPACE 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 375 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) DEVELOPER COMMITMENT -MISCELLANEOUS 6’ DRAINAGE EASEMENT 10’ TYPE D LANDSCAPE BUFFER 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 376 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) DEVELOPER COMMITMENT -STORMWATER 6’ DRAINAGE EASEMENT 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 377 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 378 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) UPDATED SITE PLAN 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 379 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 380 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) EXISTING SITE PLAN 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 381 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) From:GundlachNancy To:mark@mecurtis.com; "Kelvin Deonarine"; Jessica Harrelson Cc:SawyerMichael; ScottTrinity Subject:RE: 2280 Santa Barbara Blvd, Naples Fl 34116 Date:Tuesday, January 28, 2020 10:40:34 AM Hi Mark, Kelvin and Jessica, Thank you for working together to resolve this issue. Respectfully, Nancy Nancy Gundlach, AICP, PLA Principal Planner Zoning Services (239)252-2484 Nancy.Gundlach@colliercountyfl.gov From: mark@mecurtis.com <mark@mecurtis.com> Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2020 10:05 AM To: 'Kelvin Deonarine' <deonarine8@aol.com>; jessica@davidsonengineering.com Cc: GundlachNancy <Nancy.Gundlach@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: RE: 2280 Santa Barbara Blvd, Naples Fl 34116 EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. That’s awesome Kevin! I really appreciate you and your brother stopping by and working with me in a neighborly manner. I look forward to the beefed up barrier between the properties, as well. I wish you continued success with your store. Regards Mark From: Kelvin Deonarine <deonarine8@aol.com> Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2020 9:21 AM To: mark@mecurtis.com; jessica@davidsonengineering.com Subject: 2280 Santa Barbara Blvd, Naples Fl 34116   9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 382 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR)   Hi Mark   It was a pleasure speaking with you yesterday.  As per our conversation on 27th January 2020, we agreed for the following on the above mentioned property address:   - Addition of fruit trees and plant it to your liking - Install sod on the apron and ride of way - Install metal reflectors on the back of the building to prevent further occurance.   We apologize for any inconvenience caused and look forward to rectifying the problem.   If you have any more questions, please feel free to contact me at 239-920-1587.     Thank You        Anand Deonarine 7 Food Mart & Tortilleria 2332 Santa Barbara Blvd  Naples Fl, 34116 Deonarie8@aol.com         Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 383 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.fPacket Pg. 384Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) From:mark@mecurtis.com To:Jessica Harrelson; "Kelvin Deonarine"; "Anand Deonarine" Subject:RE: 2280 Santa Barbara Blvd, Naples Fl 34116 Date:Friday, January 31, 2020 1:30:08 PM Hi Jessica Type B that would be fine between their property (parking lot) and mine. Thanks Mark From: Jessica Harrelson <Jessica@davidsonengineering.com> Sent: Friday, January 31, 2020 12:52 PM To: mark@mecurtis.com; 'Kelvin Deonarine' <deonarine8@aol.com>; Anand Deonarine <deonarine8@aol.com> Subject: RE: 2280 Santa Barbara Blvd, Naples Fl 34116 Good afternoon Mark, Anand and Kelvin, For my records, and to move forward with the PUD process, can you please confirm the details of the “beefed up” landscape buffer that was discussed? If anything more than the 15’ Type ‘B’ LA buffer, inclusive of the required 6’ hedge, was discussed this will need to be addressed in the PUD. Below is the Type B buffer requirements, contained in the Collier County Land Development Code. Type B Buffer: Fifteen-foot-wide, 80 percent opaque within one year landscape buffer six feet in height, which may include a wall, fence, hedge, berm or combination thereof, including trees spaced no more than 25 feet on center. When planting a hedge, it shall be a minimum of ten gallon plants five feet in height, three feet in spread and spaced a maximum four feet on center at planting. When a Type B buffer is located within a residential PUD and adjacent to a lake, the required plant materials may be clustered to provide views. Clustered tree plantings shall not exceed 60 feet between clusters and the clustered hedge plantings can be provided as a double row of shrubs that are a minimum of 30 inches in height. When the adjacent lake exceeds 1,500 feet in width the hedge planting shall not be required. When a community facility is located within a residential PUD and abuts a residential unit, a Type B buffer shall be required. When a fence or wall is used within the buffer a minimum of 50 percent of the trees and hedge plantings shall be located on the residential side of the fence or wall Thank you. Jessica Harrelson, AICP Senior Planner Main: 239.434.6060 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 385 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) jessica@davidsonengineering.com www.davidsonengineering.com From: mark@mecurtis.com <mark@mecurtis.com> Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2020 10:05 AM To: 'Kelvin Deonarine' <deonarine8@aol.com>; Jessica Harrelson <Jessica@davidsonengineering.com> Cc: 'GundlachNancy' <Nancy.Gundlach@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: RE: 2280 Santa Barbara Blvd, Naples Fl 34116 That’s awesome Kevin! I really appreciate you and your brother stopping by and working with me in a neighborly manner. I look forward to the beefed up barrier between the properties, as well. I wish you continued success with your store. Regards Mark From: Kelvin Deonarine <deonarine8@aol.com> Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2020 9:21 AM To: mark@mecurtis.com; jessica@davidsonengineering.com Subject: 2280 Santa Barbara Blvd, Naples Fl 34116     Hi Mark   It was a pleasure speaking with you yesterday.  As per our conversation on 27th January 2020, we agreed for the following on the above mentioned property address:   - Addition of fruit trees and plant it to your liking - Install sod on the apron and ride of way - Install metal reflectors on the back of the building to prevent further occurance.   We apologize for any inconvenience caused and look forward to rectifying the problem.   If you have any more questions, please feel free to contact me at 239-920-1587.     Thank You        Anand Deonarine 7 Food Mart & Tortilleria 2332 Santa Barbara Blvd  Naples Fl, 34116 Deonarie8@aol.com         9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 386 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 387 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 388 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 389 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 390 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 391 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 392 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 393 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 394 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 395 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.fPacket Pg. 396Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 397 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 398 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 399 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 ADDRESSING CHECKLIST Please complete the following and email to GMD_Addressing@colliergov.net or fax to the Operations Division at 239-252-5724 or submit in person to the Addressing Section at the above address. Form must be signed by Addressing personnel prior to pre-application meeting, please allow 3 days for processing. Not all items will apply to every project. Items in bold type are required. FOLIO NUMBERS MUST BE PROVIDED. Forms older than 6 months will require additional review and approval by the Addressing Section. PETITION TYPE (Indicate type below, complete a separate Addressing Checklist for each Petition type) BL (Blasting Permit) BD (Boat Dock Extension) Carnival/Circus Permit CU (Conditional Use) EXP (Excavation Permit) FP (Final Plat LLA (Lot Line Adjustment) PNC (Project Name Change) PPL (Plans & Plat Review) PSP (Preliminary Subdivision Plat) PUD Rezone RZ (Standard Rezone) SDP (Site Development Plan) SDPA (SDP Amendment) SDPI (Insubstantial Change to SDP) SIP (Site Im provement Plan) SIPI (Insubstantial Change to SIP) SNR (Street Name Change) SNC (Street Name Change – Unplatted) TDR (Transfer of Development Rights) VA (Variance) VRP (Vegetation Removal Permit) VRSFP (Vegetation Removal & Site Fill Permit) OTHER LEGAL DESCRIPT ION of subject property or properties (copy of lengthy description may be attached) FOLIO (Property ID) NUMBER(s) of above (attach to, or associate with, legal description if more than one) STREET ADDRESS or ADDRESSES (as applicable, if already assigned) PROPOSED STREET NAMES (if applicable) SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NUMBER (for existing projects/sites only) LOCATION MAP must be attached showing exact location of project/site in relation to nearest public road right- of-way PROPOSED PROJECT NAME (if applicable) SDP - or AR or PL # SURVEY (copy - needed only for unplatted properties) CURRENT PROJECT NAME (if applicable) Rev. 6/9/2017 Page 1 of 2 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 400 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 Please Return Approved Checklist By: Email Personally picked up Applicant Name: Signature on Addressing Checklist does not constitute Project and/or Street Name approval and is subject to further review by the Operations Division. FOR STAFF USE ONLY Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Approved by: Date: Updated by: Date: IF OLDER THAN 6 MONTHS, FORM MUST BE UPDATED OR NEW FORM SUBMITTED Fax Email/Fax:Phone: Project or development names proposed for, or already appearing in, condominium documents (if application; indicate whether proposed or existing) Rev. 6/9/2017 Page 2 of 2 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 401 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 402 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 403 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 404 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 405 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 406 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 407 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 408 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 409 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 410 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 411 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 412 Attachment: Attachment E-Application (12390 : PL20190000683 7-Foodmart PUDR) 06/11/2020 COLLIER COUNTY Collier County Planning Commission Item Number: 9.A.3 Item Summary: PL20190002862: A Resolution of the Board of Zoning Appeals of Collier County, Florida, relating to Petition Number NUA-PL20190002862, providing for the approval of a nonconforming use alteration pursuant to LDC Section 9.03.03.B. to reduce the eastern side yard setback from 7.5 feet to 5.3 feet for the existing structure and proposed enclosure of the screened -in lanai. The subject property is described as Lot 18, Block 53, Naples Park Unit 4, also described as 851 92nd Avenue North, in Section 33, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: John Kelly, Senior Planner] Meeting Date: 06/11/2020 Prepared by: Title: Planner – Zoning Name: John Kelly 05/08/2020 5:56 PM Submitted by: Title: Manager - Planning – Zoning Name: Ray Bellows 05/08/2020 5:56 PM Approved By: Review: Zoning Ray Bellows Review Item Completed 05/12/2020 4:31 PM Growth Management Operations & Regulatory Management Donna Guitard Review Item Completed 05/14/2020 12:11 PM Road Maintenance Diane Lynch Review item Completed 05/18/2020 4:36 PM Growth Management Department James C French Review Item Completed 05/18/2020 9:11 PM Zoning Ray Bellows Review Item Completed 05/19/2020 11:52 AM Planning Commission Mark Strain Meeting Pending 06/11/2020 9:00 AM 9.A.3 Packet Pg. 413 NUA-PL20190002862 – 851 92nd Ave N Page 1 of 8 May 7, 2020 STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION – ZONING SERVICES SECTION DATE: JUNE 18, 2020 SUBJECT: NUA-PL20190002862; 851 92ND AVENUE NORTH ______________________________________________________________________________ PROPERTY OWNER/APPLICANT Owner/Applicant: John and Linda Spevacek 851 92nd Avenue North Naples, FL 34108 Agent: Anthony P. Pires, Esq. and Zachary W. Lombardo, Esq. Woodward, Pires & Lombardo, P.A. 3200 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 200 Naples, FL 34103 REQUESTED ACTION: The petitioner requests the Collier County Board of Zoning Appeals approve a non-conforming use alteration (NUA) pursuant to LDC Section 9.03.03.B. to reduce the eastern side yard setback from 7.5 feet to 5.3 feet for the existing structure and the proposed enclosure of the screened-in lanai which constitutes an addition of habitable space. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property is located at 851 92nd Avenue North and is further identified as Lot 18, Block 53, Naples Park Unit 4, in Section 33, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. (See location map on page 2). PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The applicant had submitted a Building Permit application to Collier County, No. PRBD20190519175, in part to convert a screened-in lanai into a game room; unfortunately, the accompanying site plan revealed the structure did not satisfy the 7.5-foot side yard setback requirement for principal structures located within the Residential Multi-Family-6 (RMF-6) Zoning District and as such could not be approved. It has subsequently been established that the existing single-family residence is legal nonconforming and could qualify to be expanded by means of engaging the Nonconforming Use Alteration (NUA) petition process to obtain a 9.A.3.a Packet Pg. 414 Attachment: NUA-PL20190002862 - 851 92nd Ave N - Staff Report FINAL (12358 : 851 92ND Avenue North - Spevacek NUA-PL20190002862) NUA-PL20190002862 – 851 92nd Ave N Page 2 of 8 May 7, 2020 9.A.3.a Packet Pg. 415 Attachment: NUA-PL20190002862 - 851 92nd Ave N - Staff Report FINAL (12358 : 851 92ND Avenue North - Spevacek NUA-PL20190002862) NUA-PL20190002862 – 851 92nd Ave N Page 3 of 8 May 7, 2020 Resolution by the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) allowing for said residence to be expanded; enclosure of the lanai constitutes an expansion of the habitable area of the residence. Ultimately, the petitioner seeks to reduce the eastern side yard setback from 7.5 feet to 5.3 feet for the existing structure to allow for the enclosure of the screened-in lanai; the existing footprint of the structure will not change. SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING: This section of the staff report identifies the land uses and zoning classifications for properties surrounding the subject property: North: Improved, single-family residence located within an RMF-6 Zoning District East: Improved, single-family residence located within an RMF-6 Zoning District South: 92nd Avenue North (Right-of-Way) then a single-family residence located within an RMF-6 Zoning District West: Improved, single-family residence located within an RMF-6 Zoning District Collier County GIS 9.A.3.a Packet Pg. 416 Attachment: NUA-PL20190002862 - 851 92nd Ave N - Staff Report FINAL (12358 : 851 92ND Avenue North - Spevacek NUA-PL20190002862) NUA-PL20190002862 – 851 92nd Ave N Page 4 of 8 May 7, 2020 GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY: The subject property is within the Urban – Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict, of the Future Land Use Map of the GMP. The GMP does not address individual NUA requests but deals with the larger issue of the actual use. As previously noted, the petitioner seeks an NUA pursuant to LDC Section 9.03.03.B to reduce the eastern side yard setback from 7.5 feet to 5.3 feet for the existing single-family residence to allow for the enclosure of a screened-in lanai. The subject use is consistent with the FLUM of the GMP. The requested NUA does not have any impact on this property's consistency with the County's GMP. STAFF ANALYSIS: The initial development of the above described property was authorized by the issuance of Collier County Building Permit, No. 87-5405, issued on December 11, 1987, for a single-family residence. Review comments that appear on the permit record yield that the required side yard setback at the time of review was five-feet. A Boundary Survey accompanying the permit file, dated September 16, 1987, and serving as the approved Site Plan, for a single-family residence with an allowable two-foot roof overhang, setback five-feet from the east side property line and seven-feet from the west side property line; the lot measures 50-feet by 135-feet with a total lot area of 6,750 square feet. A Certificate of Occupancy was issued on May 09, 1988, upon completion of construction authorized by the referenced building permit evidencing satisfaction with the Building Code and zoning regulation at the time of construction. Staff notes that spot Surveys were not required by the County until 1989. The petitioner has presented a Boundary Survey dated February, 2020, to establish that the existing residence was constructed slightly askew to the side property lines; measuring 5.7-feet to the east side property line from the southeast corner of the structure and 5.3- feet to the east side property line from the northeast corner. Staff research reveals the applicable zoning regulation at the time of construction was Ordinance 82-2, as amended. As evidenced within the building permit file, the subject property was located within a Residential Multiple-Family-six zoning district at the time of permit issuance. Ordinance 82-2, as amended, Section 7.12.b.1) reveals that single-family residences were an allowable principal permitted use within the RMF-six zoning district; however, section 7.12.c reveals that the required minimum lot area was 7,260 square feet and the minimum lot width was 100-feet. Section 20, Definitions, of said Ordinance contains the following definition: Non-Conforming Lot of Record: Any lot or parcel which was recorded or for which an agreement for deed was executed prior to October 14, 1974, and which lot or parcel does not meet the minimum width and lot area requirements as a result of the passage of this Ordinance shall be considered as a legal non-conforming lot and shall be eligible for the issuance of a building permit provided all other requirements of this Ordinance and the Florida Statutes are met. In keeping with the above definition, Zoning Staff determined that the subject property is located within a recorded subdivision, Naples Park Unit No. four, as evidenced within Plat Book three, Page seven, as approved by the Board of County Commissioners on January 12, 1954, within the public records of Collier County, Florida. The Boundary Survey/Site Plan plat reveals the subject property was consistent with the recorded plat, measuring 50-feet by 135-feet. Zoning staff 9.A.3.a Packet Pg. 417 Attachment: NUA-PL20190002862 - 851 92nd Ave N - Staff Report FINAL (12358 : 851 92ND Avenue North - Spevacek NUA-PL20190002862) NUA-PL20190002862 – 851 92nd Ave N Page 5 of 8 May 7, 2020 therefore concludes the subject property was legal nonconforming at the time of permitting and was therefore eligible to take advantage of Ordinance 82-2, as amended, Section 8.5.b., Exceptions to Required Yards, which states, in part: Side Yard Exceptions. Where lots of record existed prior to the effective date of this Zoning Ordinance, which lots do not meet the minimum width requirements set out in this Zoning Ordinance, then for such lots, and only for such lots, the minimum side yards shall be not less than ten (10%) percent of the average lot width, provided no side yard shall be less than five (5) feet… Having established that the existing residence was legally constructed upon a legal nonconforming lot of record using an allowable side setback of five-feet, the applicant now desires to enclose a portion of the existing structure that was permitted as a screened-in lanai; such an enclosure constitutes a building addition as the habitable area is increased. The current LDC, Ordinance 04- 41, Section 9.03.03.B, allows structures found to be legal nonconforming by reason of lot area, yards, and/or location to remain provided that they are otherwise lawful and that they not be enlarged or altered in a way which increases the nonconformity without approval of the BZA by resolution (see LDC Section 9.03.03.B.4). There is also no longer a provision within the Code to allow for a reduction of the side yard for legal non-conforming properties. For these reasons the petitioner has engaged the NUA process to effectively reduce the eastern side yard setback from 7.5 feet to 5.3 feet for the existing structure to allow for the proposed enclosure of the screened-in lanai; the existing footprint of the structure will not change. Staff notes that LDC Section 4.02.01.D.1.8., exemptions and exclusions from design standards, states: Hoods, canopies, or roof overhangs shall not project over (3) three feet into a required yard but shall not come closer than one (1) foot to the lot line. The BZA’s approval of this NUA will allow the applicant to satisfy their objectives by allowing for the review and subsequent approval of a Building Permit to enclose the lanai located under the same roof and at the northeast corner of the existing legal nonconforming residence. The applicant was able to solicit signed letters of no objection from the following: 1) Tom and Cathy Morrison at 850 92nd Avenue North; and 2) Randy and Beth Martin at 855 92ns Avenue North. The decision to grant an NUA is based on the criteria in LDC Section 9.03.03.B.5.a through f. (in bold font below). Staff has analyzed this petition relative to these provisions and offers the following responses: a. The alteration, expansion, or replacement will not increase the density of the parcel or lot on which the nonconforming single-family dwelling, duplex, or mobile home is located. The proposed enclosure of the existing screened-in lanai will not change the use of the existing building which is a single-family dwelling; therefore, the density of the parcel is not being increased. 9.A.3.a Packet Pg. 418 Attachment: NUA-PL20190002862 - 851 92nd Ave N - Staff Report FINAL (12358 : 851 92ND Avenue North - Spevacek NUA-PL20190002862) NUA-PL20190002862 – 851 92nd Ave N Page 6 of 8 May 7, 2020 b. The alteration, expansion, or replacement will not exceed the building height requirements of the district most closely associated with the subject nonconforming use. The existing screened-in lanai was constructed beneath the structures original roof system. The proposed enclosure of said screened-in lanai incorporates the original roof system; no changes or alterations to the existing roof are contemplated or proposed. The referenced building permit application for the lanai enclosure yields no authorization for any improvements to the existing roof system. Staff notes that the current maximum building height within the RMF-6 zoning district is 35-feet; Building Permit No. 87-5405 was approved for a single-family residence with a maximum height of 1-story at 15-feet. c. The alteration, expansion, or replacement will not further encroach upon any nonconforming setback. The proposed enclosure of the existing screened-in lanai will not alter the existing building footprint or roof/roof overhang as was approved at the time of initial construction as evidenced by Building Permit No. 87-5405. d. The alteration, expansion, or replacement will not decrease or further decrease the existing parking areas for the structure. The existing screened-in lanai is located to the rear of the existing single-family residence. There is an existing garage and driveway to the front of the residence that will not be impacted by the enclosure of said screened-in lanai. The proposed enclosure of said screened-in lanai will not impact on the existing garage or driveway. e. The alteration, expansion, or replacement will not damage the character or quality of the neighborhood in which it is located or hinder the proper future development of the surrounding properties; and The existing single-family residence has existed in its present location since 1987; the area to be enclosed will not impact upon the existing building’s height or footprint. Given that lanais are typically a place where people gather, the enclosure of said lanai will serve to attenuate any noise that could result from such a gathering. Additionally, the enclosure must satisfy the current Building Code which has most certainly been upgraded since 1987; the inclusion of hurricane resistant doors and windows would be an improvement to the serves to improve the resiliency of the original structure. The proposed improvements will improve the character and quality of the neighborhood and will not hinder any future development. f. Such alteration, expansion, or replacement will not present a threat to the health, safety, or welfare of the community or its residents. The proposed enclosure of the existing screened-in lanai is to take place under the authority of an issued building permit which will require the County’s approval of plans and provide for inspections that will assure compliance with the Building Code. The building permit 9.A.3.a Packet Pg. 419 Attachment: NUA-PL20190002862 - 851 92nd Ave N - Staff Report FINAL (12358 : 851 92ND Avenue North - Spevacek NUA-PL20190002862) NUA-PL20190002862 – 851 92nd Ave N Page 7 of 8 May 7, 2020 approval and inspections process will limit any potential threat to the health, safety, or welfare of the community and its residents as far as any dangers that may be inherent upon construction sites are concerned. As noted previously, the fact that the proposed lanai enclosure will bring a portion of the structure up to today’s standard is in fact an improvement to the Naples Park community. NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM): A NIM is not required for a Nonconforming Use Alteration. COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The County Attorney Office reviewed this staff report on May 19, 2020. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) forward Petition NUA- PL20190002862 to the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) with a recommendation of approval. Attachments: A. Draft Resolution B. Boundary Survey, Plat Map, Permit No. PRBD-PL20190519175 info, and Sign Posting C. Applicant’s Application and Backup Material, including Letter(s) of No Objection x 2 9.A.3.a Packet Pg. 420 Attachment: NUA-PL20190002862 - 851 92nd Ave N - Staff Report FINAL (12358 : 851 92ND Avenue North - Spevacek NUA-PL20190002862) NUA-PL20190002862 – 851 92nd Ave N Page 8 of 8 May 7, 2020 PREPARED BY: __________________________________________ ___________________ JOHN A. KELLY, SENIOR PLANNER DATE ZONING DIVISION-ZONING SERVICES SECTION REVIEWED BY: _________________________________________ ___________________ RAYMOND V. BELLOWS, ZONING MANAGER DATE ZONING DIVISION-ZONING SERVICES SECTION _________________________________________ ___________________ JAMES FRENCH, DEPUTY DEPARTMENT HEAD DATE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT 9.A.3.a Packet Pg. 421 Attachment: NUA-PL20190002862 - 851 92nd Ave N - Staff Report FINAL (12358 : 851 92ND Avenue North - Spevacek NUA-PL20190002862) [20-CPS-01986/1536599/1]36 NUA-PL20190002862 851 92nd Ave N 4/23/20 1 of 2 RESOLUTION NO. 20 - A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, RELATING TO PETITION NUMBER NUA-PL20190002862, PROVIDING FOR THE APPROVAL OF A NONCONFORMING USE ALTERATION PURSUANT TO LDC SECTION 9.03.03.B. TO REDUCE THE EASTERN SIDE YARD SETBACK FROM 7.5 FEET TO 5.3 FEET FOR THE EXISTING STRUCTURE AND PROPOSED ENCLOSURE OF THE SCREENED-IN LANAI. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS DESCRIBED AS LOT 18, BLOCK 53, NAPLES PARK UNIT 4, ALSO DESCRIBED AS 851 92ND AVENUE NORTH, IN SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida in Chapter 67–1246, Laws of Florida, and Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, has conferred on Collier County the power to establish, coordinate and enforce zoning and such business regulations as are necessary for the protection of the public; and WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a Land Development Code (Ordinance No. 2004-41, as amended) which includes a Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance establishing regulations for the zoning of particular geographic divisions of the County, among which is the granting of Nonconforming Use Alterations; and WHEREAS, the Board of Zoning Appeals (Board), has held a public hearing after notice as in said regulations made and provided, and has considered the advisability of a Nonconforming Use Alteration pursuant to Collier County Land Development Code Section 9.03.03.B. to reduce the eastern side yard setback from 7.5 feet to 5.3 feet for the existing structure and proposed enclosure of the screened-in lanai, as shown on the Survey attached hereto as Exhibit “A,” in the Residential Multi Family (RMF-6) Zoning District for the property hereinafter described, and has found as a matter of fact that satisfactory provision and arrangement have been made concerning all applicable matters required by said regulations and in accordance with Subsection 9.03.03.B. of the Land Development Code; and WHEREAS, all interested parties have been given opportunity to be heard by this Board in a public meeting assembled and the Board having considered all matters presented. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA that: CAO 9.A.3.b Packet Pg. 422 Attachment: Attachment A - Resolution - 042320 (12358 : 851 92ND Avenue North - Spevacek NUA-PL20190002862) [20-CPS-01986/1536599/1]36 NUA-PL20190002862 851 92nd Ave N 4/23/20 2 of 2 Petition Number NUA-PL20190002862 filed by Anthony Pires, Esq. and Zachary Lombardo, Esq. of Woodward, Pires & Lombardo, P.A., representing John and Linda Spevacek with respect to the property hereinafter described as: Lot 18, Block 53, Naples Park Unit 4, according to the map or plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 3, Page(s) 7, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. Folio No. 62712680002 be and the same is hereby approved for a Nonconforming Use Alteration pursuant to Collier County Land Development Code Section 9.03.03.B. to reduce the eastern side yard setback from 7.5 feet to 5.3 feet for the existing structure and proposed enclosure of the screened-in lanai, as shown on the attached Exhibit “A,” in the zoning district wherein said property is located. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution be recorded in the minutes of this Board. This Resolution adopted after motion, second, and majority vote, this ____ day of ______________, 2020. ATTEST: BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: __________________________ By: __________________________ , Deputy Clerk Burt L. Saunders, Chairman Approved as to form and legality: _________________________ Sally A. Ashkar Assistant County Attorney Attachments: Exhibit A – Survey SAA 4-23-20 CAO 9.A.3.b Packet Pg. 423 Attachment: Attachment A - Resolution - 042320 (12358 : 851 92ND Avenue North - Spevacek NUA-PL20190002862) CAO9.A.3.bPacket Pg. 424Attachment: Attachment A - Resolution - 042320 (12358 : 851 92ND Avenue North - Spevacek NUA-PL20190002862) 9.A.3.cPacket Pg. 425Attachment: Attachment B - Staff Exhibits (12358 : 851 92ND Avenue North - Spevacek NUA-PL20190002862) 9.A.3.cPacket Pg. 426Attachment: Attachment B - Staff Exhibits (12358 : 851 92ND Avenue North - Spevacek NUA-PL20190002862) 9.A.3.cPacket Pg. 427Attachment: Attachment B - Staff Exhibits (12358 : 851 92ND Avenue North - Spevacek NUA-PL20190002862) 9.A.3.cPacket Pg. 428Attachment: Attachment B - Staff Exhibits (12358 : 851 92ND Avenue North - Spevacek NUA-PL20190002862) 9.A.3.cPacket Pg. 429Attachment: Attachment B - Staff Exhibits (12358 : 851 92ND Avenue North - Spevacek NUA-PL20190002862) 9.A.3.cPacket Pg. 430Attachment: Attachment B - Staff Exhibits (12358 : 851 92ND Avenue North - Spevacek NUA-PL20190002862) 9.A.3.cPacket Pg. 431Attachment: Attachment B - Staff Exhibits (12358 : 851 92ND Avenue North - Spevacek NUA-PL20190002862) 9.A.3.cPacket Pg. 432Attachment: Attachment B - Staff Exhibits (12358 : 851 92ND Avenue North - Spevacek NUA-PL20190002862) 9.A.3.cPacket Pg. 433Attachment: Attachment B - Staff Exhibits (12358 : 851 92ND Avenue North - Spevacek NUA-PL20190002862) 9.A.3.cPacket Pg. 434Attachment: Attachment B - Staff Exhibits (12358 : 851 92ND Avenue North - Spevacek NUA-PL20190002862) 9.A.3.cPacket Pg. 435Attachment: Attachment B - Staff Exhibits (12358 : 851 92ND Avenue North - Spevacek NUA-PL20190002862) 9.A.3.cPacket Pg. 436Attachment: Attachment B - Staff Exhibits (12358 : 851 92ND Avenue North - Spevacek NUA-PL20190002862) 9.A.3.cPacket Pg. 437Attachment: Attachment B - Staff Exhibits (12358 : 851 92ND Avenue North - Spevacek NUA-PL20190002862) KellyJohn From: Attachments: To: Cc: Sent: Subiect: KellyJohn Friday, May 22, 2O?O 2:7? PM KellyJohn BellowsRay NUA-P120190002862 - CCPC 06-'11-2020 BZA 07 -14-ZOZ0 - Public Hearing Sign Posting 1 F073CA8-281 A-4BFD-92C0-0B789049B95Dipeg; C58C73E9-D598-4645-91 D3- Fl AT4A65CCBEjpeg The required Public Hearing sign for the referenced meetings was placed by me, adjacent to the roadway at 851 92nd Ave N, at approximately 12:20 P.M. this date as evidenced by the attached photographs. Respectfully, John Kelly Senior Planner Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. lf you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. lnstead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. 1 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 438 Attachment: Attachment B - Staff Exhibits (12358 : 851 92ND Avenue North - Spevacek NUA-PL20190002862) I I t UBLIG HEAR'A'G FOR 851 92d Avenue l{orth Nonconforming Use Alteration Petition No. 20190flti940 CCPC: June il, 2OZO -g A.M. BCC: Juty 14,2OZO - 9 A.M. 99!!oI Co.unty covemmenr Center3299 Tamtamt rratt East - e-FioiiIII Fl' I-] t 't f -{ ! t John K.lly, s.nlor Phnnar:239-252-57 1 0 I _s!s -:-> _ lr 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 439 Attachment: Attachment B - Staff Exhibits (12358 : 851 92ND Avenue North - Spevacek NUA-PL20190002862) 9.A.3.dPacket Pg. 440Attachment: Attachment C - Application and Backup (12358 : 851 92ND Avenue North - Spevacek NUA-PL20190002862) 9.A.3.dPacket Pg. 441Attachment: Attachment C - Application and Backup (12358 : 851 92ND Avenue North - Spevacek NUA-PL20190002862) 9.A.3.dPacket Pg. 442Attachment: Attachment C - Application and Backup (12358 : 851 92ND Avenue North - Spevacek NUA-PL20190002862) 9.A.3.dPacket Pg. 443Attachment: Attachment C - Application and Backup (12358 : 851 92ND Avenue North - Spevacek NUA-PL20190002862) 9.A.3.dPacket Pg. 444Attachment: Attachment C - Application and Backup (12358 : 851 92ND Avenue North - Spevacek NUA-PL20190002862) 9.A.3.dPacket Pg. 445Attachment: Attachment C - Application and Backup (12358 : 851 92ND Avenue North - Spevacek NUA-PL20190002862) 9.A.3.dPacket Pg. 446Attachment: Attachment C - Application and Backup (12358 : 851 92ND Avenue North - Spevacek NUA-PL20190002862) 9.A.3.dPacket Pg. 447Attachment: Attachment C - Application and Backup (12358 : 851 92ND Avenue North - Spevacek NUA-PL20190002862) 9.A.3.dPacket Pg. 448Attachment: Attachment C - Application and Backup (12358 : 851 92ND Avenue North - Spevacek NUA-PL20190002862) 9.A.3.dPacket Pg. 449Attachment: Attachment C - Application and Backup (12358 : 851 92ND Avenue North - Spevacek NUA-PL20190002862) 9.A.3.dPacket Pg. 450Attachment: Attachment C - Application and Backup (12358 : 851 92ND Avenue North - Spevacek NUA-PL20190002862) 9.A.3.dPacket Pg. 451Attachment: Attachment C - Application and Backup (12358 : 851 92ND Avenue North - Spevacek NUA-PL20190002862) 9.A.3.dPacket Pg. 452Attachment: Attachment C - Application and Backup (12358 : 851 92ND Avenue North - Spevacek NUA-PL20190002862) 9.A.3.dPacket Pg. 453Attachment: Attachment C - Application and Backup (12358 : 851 92ND Avenue North - Spevacek NUA-PL20190002862) 9.A.3.dPacket Pg. 454Attachment: Attachment C - Application and Backup (12358 : 851 92ND Avenue North - Spevacek NUA-PL20190002862) 9.A.3.dPacket Pg. 455Attachment: Attachment C - Application and Backup (12358 : 851 92ND Avenue North - Spevacek NUA-PL20190002862) 9.A.3.dPacket Pg. 456Attachment: Attachment C - Application and Backup (12358 : 851 92ND Avenue North - Spevacek NUA-PL20190002862) 9.A.3.dPacket Pg. 457Attachment: Attachment C - Application and Backup (12358 : 851 92ND Avenue North - Spevacek NUA-PL20190002862) 9.A.3.dPacket Pg. 458Attachment: Attachment C - Application and Backup (12358 : 851 92ND Avenue North - Spevacek NUA-PL20190002862) 9.A.3.dPacket Pg. 459Attachment: Attachment C - Application and Backup (12358 : 851 92ND Avenue North - Spevacek NUA-PL20190002862) 9.A.3.dPacket Pg. 460Attachment: Attachment C - Application and Backup (12358 : 851 92ND Avenue North - Spevacek NUA-PL20190002862) 9.A.3.dPacket Pg. 461Attachment: Attachment C - Application and Backup (12358 : 851 92ND Avenue North - Spevacek NUA-PL20190002862) 9.A.3.dPacket Pg. 462Attachment: Attachment C - Application and Backup (12358 : 851 92ND Avenue North - Spevacek NUA-PL20190002862) 9.A.3.dPacket Pg. 463Attachment: Attachment C - Application and Backup (12358 : 851 92ND Avenue North - Spevacek NUA-PL20190002862) 9.A.3.dPacket Pg. 464Attachment: Attachment C - Application and Backup (12358 : 851 92ND Avenue North - Spevacek NUA-PL20190002862) 9.A.3.dPacket Pg. 465Attachment: Attachment C - Application and Backup (12358 : 851 92ND Avenue North - Spevacek NUA-PL20190002862) 9.A.3.dPacket Pg. 466Attachment: Attachment C - Application and Backup (12358 : 851 92ND Avenue North - Spevacek NUA-PL20190002862) 9.A.3.dPacket Pg. 467Attachment: Attachment C - Application and Backup (12358 : 851 92ND Avenue North - Spevacek NUA-PL20190002862) 9.A.3.dPacket Pg. 468Attachment: Attachment C - Application and Backup (12358 : 851 92ND Avenue North - Spevacek NUA-PL20190002862) 9.A.3.dPacket Pg. 469Attachment: Attachment C - Application and Backup (12358 : 851 92ND Avenue North - Spevacek NUA-PL20190002862) 9.A.3.dPacket Pg. 470Attachment: Attachment C - Application and Backup (12358 : 851 92ND Avenue North - Spevacek NUA-PL20190002862) 9.A.3.dPacket Pg. 471Attachment: Attachment C - Application and Backup (12358 : 851 92ND Avenue North - Spevacek NUA-PL20190002862) 9.A.3.dPacket Pg. 472Attachment: Attachment C - Application and Backup (12358 : 851 92ND Avenue North - Spevacek NUA-PL20190002862) 9.A.3.dPacket Pg. 473Attachment: Attachment C - Application and Backup (12358 : 851 92ND Avenue North - Spevacek NUA-PL20190002862) 9.A.3.dPacket Pg. 474Attachment: Attachment C - Application and Backup (12358 : 851 92ND Avenue North - Spevacek NUA-PL20190002862) 9.A.3.dPacket Pg. 475Attachment: Attachment C - Application and Backup (12358 : 851 92ND Avenue North - Spevacek NUA-PL20190002862) 9.A.3.dPacket Pg. 476Attachment: Attachment C - Application and Backup (12358 : 851 92ND Avenue North - Spevacek NUA-PL20190002862) 9.A.3.dPacket Pg. 477Attachment: Attachment C - Application and Backup (12358 : 851 92ND Avenue North - Spevacek NUA-PL20190002862) 9.A.3.dPacket Pg. 478Attachment: Attachment C - Application and Backup (12358 : 851 92ND Avenue North - Spevacek NUA-PL20190002862) 9.A.3.dPacket Pg. 479Attachment: Attachment C - Application and Backup (12358 : 851 92ND Avenue North - Spevacek NUA-PL20190002862) 9.A.3.dPacket Pg. 480Attachment: Attachment C - Application and Backup (12358 : 851 92ND Avenue North - Spevacek NUA-PL20190002862) 9.A.3.dPacket Pg. 481Attachment: Attachment C - Application and Backup (12358 : 851 92ND Avenue North - Spevacek NUA-PL20190002862) 9.A.3.dPacket Pg. 482Attachment: Attachment C - Application and Backup (12358 : 851 92ND Avenue North - Spevacek NUA-PL20190002862) 9.A.3.dPacket Pg. 483Attachment: Attachment C - Application and Backup (12358 : 851 92ND Avenue North - Spevacek NUA-PL20190002862) 9.A.3.dPacket Pg. 484Attachment: Attachment C - Application and Backup (12358 : 851 92ND Avenue North - Spevacek NUA-PL20190002862) 9.A.3.dPacket Pg. 485Attachment: Attachment C - Application and Backup (12358 : 851 92ND Avenue North - Spevacek NUA-PL20190002862) 9.A.3.dPacket Pg. 486Attachment: Attachment C - Application and Backup (12358 : 851 92ND Avenue North - Spevacek NUA-PL20190002862) 9.A.3.dPacket Pg. 487Attachment: Attachment C - Application and Backup (12358 : 851 92ND Avenue North - Spevacek NUA-PL20190002862) 9.A.3.dPacket Pg. 488Attachment: Attachment C - Application and Backup (12358 : 851 92ND Avenue North - Spevacek NUA-PL20190002862) 9.A.3.dPacket Pg. 489Attachment: Attachment C - Application and Backup (12358 : 851 92ND Avenue North - Spevacek NUA-PL20190002862) 9.A.3.dPacket Pg. 490Attachment: Attachment C - Application and Backup (12358 : 851 92ND Avenue North - Spevacek NUA-PL20190002862) 9.A.3.dPacket Pg. 491Attachment: Attachment C - Application and Backup (12358 : 851 92ND Avenue North - Spevacek NUA-PL20190002862) 9.A.3.dPacket Pg. 492Attachment: Attachment C - Application and Backup (12358 : 851 92ND Avenue North - Spevacek NUA-PL20190002862) 9.A.3.dPacket Pg. 493Attachment: Attachment C - Application and Backup (12358 : 851 92ND Avenue North - Spevacek NUA-PL20190002862) 9.A.3.dPacket Pg. 494Attachment: Attachment C - Application and Backup (12358 : 851 92ND Avenue North - Spevacek NUA-PL20190002862) 9.A.3.dPacket Pg. 495Attachment: Attachment C - Application and Backup (12358 : 851 92ND Avenue North - Spevacek NUA-PL20190002862) 9.A.3.dPacket Pg. 496Attachment: Attachment C - Application and Backup (12358 : 851 92ND Avenue North - Spevacek NUA-PL20190002862) 9.A.3.dPacket Pg. 497Attachment: Attachment C - Application and Backup (12358 : 851 92ND Avenue North - Spevacek NUA-PL20190002862) 9.A.3.dPacket Pg. 498Attachment: Attachment C - Application and Backup (12358 : 851 92ND Avenue North - Spevacek NUA-PL20190002862) 9.A.3.dPacket Pg. 499Attachment: Attachment C - Application and Backup (12358 : 851 92ND Avenue North - Spevacek NUA-PL20190002862) 06/11/2020 COLLIER COUNTY Collier County Planning Commission Item Number: 9.A.4 Item Summary: BDE-PL20190001962 A Resolution of the Collier County Planning Commission relating to BDE-PL20190001962 for a 27 foot boat dock extension over the maximum 20 feet allowed by Section 5.03.06 of the Land Development Code, for a total protrusion of 47 feet, to accommodate a new docking facility with two boat slips including two boat-lifts for the benefit of property described as Lot 8, Block G, Little Hickory Shores, Unit 3 Replat subdivision, also known as 267 3rd Street in Section 5, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. (Companion item VA-PL20190002360) [Coordinator: John Kelly, Senior Planner] Meeting Date: 06/11/2020 Prepared by: Title: Planner – Zoning Name: John Kelly 04/01/2020 1:45 PM Submitted by: Title: Manager - Planning – Zoning Name: Ray Bellows 04/01/2020 1:45 PM Approved By: Review: Zoning Ray Bellows Review Item Completed 04/01/2020 3:46 PM Growth Management Operations & Regulatory Management Donna Guitard Review Item Completed 04/13/2020 11:10 AM Road Maintenance Diane Lynch Review item Completed 04/13/2020 3:41 PM Growth Management Department James C French Review Item Completed 04/17/2020 8:45 PM Zoning Ray Bellows Review Item Completed 04/20/2020 3:02 PM Planning Commission Mark Strain Meeting Pending 06/11/2020 9:00 AM 9.A.4 Packet Pg. 500 9.A.4.aPacket Pg. 501Attachment: Staff Report BDE-PL20190001962 - FINAL (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) 9.A.4.aPacket Pg. 502Attachment: Staff Report BDE-PL20190001962 - FINAL (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) 9.A.4.aPacket Pg. 503Attachment: Staff Report BDE-PL20190001962 - FINAL (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) 9.A.4.aPacket Pg. 504Attachment: Staff Report BDE-PL20190001962 - FINAL (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) 9.A.4.aPacket Pg. 505Attachment: Staff Report BDE-PL20190001962 - FINAL (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) 9.A.4.aPacket Pg. 506Attachment: Staff Report BDE-PL20190001962 - FINAL (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) 9.A.4.aPacket Pg. 507Attachment: Staff Report BDE-PL20190001962 - FINAL (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) 9.A.4.aPacket Pg. 508Attachment: Staff Report BDE-PL20190001962 - FINAL (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) 9.A.4.aPacket Pg. 509Attachment: Staff Report BDE-PL20190001962 - FINAL (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) 25 Moody BDE. / PL20190001962 5/18/20 1 CCPC RESOLUTION NO. 20 -_____ A RESOLUTION OF THE COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION RELATING TO BDE-PL20190001962 FOR A 27 FOOT BOAT DOCK EXTENSION OVER THE MAXIMUM 20 FEET ALLOWED BY SECTION 5.03.06 OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, FOR A TOTAL PROTRUSION OF 47 FEET, TO ACCOMMODATE A NEW DOCKING FACILITY WITH TWO BOAT SLIPS INCLUDING TWO BOAT-LIFTS FOR THE BENEFIT OF PROPERTY DESCRIBED AS LOT 8, BLOCK G, LITTLE HICKORY SHORES, UNIT 3 REPLAT SUBDIVISION, ALSO KNOWN AS 267 3RD STREET W. IN SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. [PL20190001962] WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida in Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, has conferred on all counties in Florida the power to establish, coordinate and enforce zoning and such business regulations as are necessary for the protection of the public; and WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a Land Development Code (LDC) (Ordinance 04-41, as amended) which establishes regulations for the zoning of particular geographic divisions of the County, among which are provisions for granting extensions for boat docks; and WHEREAS, the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC), being duly appointed, has held a properly noticed public hearing and has considered the advisability of a 27 foot boat dock extension over the maximum 20 feet allowed by Section 5.03.06 of the Land Development Code, for a total protrusion of 47 feet, to accommodate a new docking facility with two boat slips including two boat-lifts in a Residential Single Family (RSF-4) zoning district for the property hereinafter described; and WHEREAS, the CCPC has found as a matter of fact that satisfactory provision and arrangement have been made concerning all applicable matters required by LDC Section 5.03.06; and WHEREAS, all interested parties have been given the opportunity to be heard by this Commission at a public hearing, and the Commission has considered all matters presented. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: Petition Number BDE-PL20190001962, filed by Jeff Rogers with Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc., on behalf of Equity Trust Company Custodian FBO William M. Moody IRA, with respect to the property hereinafter described as: 9.A.4.b Packet Pg. 510 Attachment: Attachment A - CCPC Resolution; 5_19_20 (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) 25 Moody BDE. / PL20190001962 5/18/20 2 LOT 8, BLOCK G, REPLAT OF UNIT NO. 3, LITTLE HICKORY SHORES, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 6, PAGE 2, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. Folio No. 56000960000 be and the same is hereby approved for a 27 foot boat dock extension over the maximum 20 feet allowed by Section 5.03.06 of the Land Development Code, for a total protrusion of 47 feet, to accommodate a new docking facility with two boat slips including two boat-lifts, as shown on the Proposed Site Plan attached as Exhibit "A", in the RSF-4 zoning district, subject to the Conditions of Approval attached as Exhibit “B.” BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution be recorded in the minutes of this Commission and filed with the County Clerk's Office. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote. Done this ______ day of ___________________, 2020. ATTEST: _________________________________ James C. French, Deputy Department Head Growth Management Department COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA __________________________________________ Mark P. Strain, Chairman Approved as to form and legality: ___________________________ Sally A. Ashkar Assistant County Attorney Attachments: Exhibit A – Proposed Site Plan Exhibit B—Conditions of Approval 9.A.4.b Packet Pg. 511 Attachment: Attachment A - CCPC Resolution; 5_19_20 (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) 9.A.4.b Packet Pg. 512 Attachment: Attachment A - CCPC Resolution; 5_19_20 (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) 9.A.4.b Packet Pg. 513 Attachment: Attachment A - CCPC Resolution; 5_19_20 (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) 9.A.4.b Packet Pg. 514 Attachment: Attachment A - CCPC Resolution; 5_19_20 (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) 9.A.4.b Packet Pg. 515 Attachment: Attachment A - CCPC Resolution; 5_19_20 (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) 9.A.4.b Packet Pg. 516 Attachment: Attachment A - CCPC Resolution; 5_19_20 (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) 9.A.4.b Packet Pg. 517 Attachment: Attachment A - CCPC Resolution; 5_19_20 (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) 9.A.4.b Packet Pg. 518 Attachment: Attachment A - CCPC Resolution; 5_19_20 (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) 9.A.4.b Packet Pg. 519 Attachment: Attachment A - CCPC Resolution; 5_19_20 (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) 9.A.4.b Packet Pg. 520 Attachment: Attachment A - CCPC Resolution; 5_19_20 (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) 9.A.4.b Packet Pg. 521 Attachment: Attachment A - CCPC Resolution; 5_19_20 (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) STATE OF FLORIDACOUNTY AERIAL VICINITY MAPSTATE OF FLORIDACOUNTY AERIAL VICINITY MAPNOTES:<> THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SUBJECTPROPERTYSUBJECTPROPERTY<> LATITUDE:N 26.326931<> LONGITUDE:W 81.831553SITE ADDRESS:<> 267 3RD ST W, LOT #8BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@turrell-associates.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\19019.00 moody - 267 3rd st\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\19019-MOODY-COUNTY.dwg LOCATION 3/4/2020THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:JRRMJ12-19-1919019.00RMJ525MOODY - 267 3RD STLOCATION MAP48RMJ---02-15-2003-04-20---JRJR---SHEET 03SHEETS 2-4, 6-9---01 OF 09COLLIER COUNTYCOLLIER COUNTY)7.(1(/':+%1)7.(1(/':+%18588288641MARCOISLANDEVERGLADESCITY9329846NAPLES90908399483783784129292983983992887846951862I-758486431856850846890896NESWKEY WESTTAMPAFT.MYERSMIAMINAPLESSUBJECTPROPERTY9.A.4.cPacket Pg. 522Attachment: Attachment B - Staff Exhibits (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) x - 9 .1x - 6 . 9 - 6 . 7 Xx - 4 . 9 - 3 .6 xx - 3 . 3 x - 8 . 9 - 5 . 9 x x - 9 .0x - 9 . 9 x - 8 . 3 x - 9 . 5 x - 8 . 9 x - 8 . 3 x - 8 . 4 x - 8 . 1x - 7 . 9 x - 4 . 2 x - 2 . 8 x - 4 . 5x - 1 . 9 x - 2 . 1 x - 2 .1x - 2 . 7 NESW081632SCALE IN FEETSITE ADDRESS:,267 3RD ST W, LOT #8BONITA SPRINGSFL34134Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@turrell-associates.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\19019.00 moody - 267 3rd st\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\19019-MOODY-COUNTY.dwg EXISTING AERIAL 3/4/2020THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:JRRMJ12-19-1919019.00RMJ525MOODY - 267 3RD STEXISTING CONDITIONS48----03-04-20----JR----ADDED BULKHEAD LINE----02 OF 09·SURVEY COURTESY OF:··SURVEY DATED:·THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY ANDARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.·ALL DATUM SHOWN HEREON IS REFERENCED TO MLW·APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPX LF):·EXISTING OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·WIDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW (APPX):·TIDAL DATUM:··MHW (NAVD)=··MLW (NAVD)=NOTES:"DAGOSTINO & WOOD, INC."01-08-19-1.66'0.32'34.0703503RD ST WMLWL = -0.5'(NAVD 1988)MHWL = -0.0'(NAVD 1988)EXISTINGTOP OF BANKPROPERTYLINERIPARIAN LINERIPARIAN LINEPLATTEDBULKHEADLINE9.A.4.cPacket Pg. 523Attachment: Attachment B - Staff Exhibits (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) p:\19019.00 moody - 267 3rd st\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\19019-MOODY-COUNTY.dwg 3/4/2020NESW051020SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@turrell-associates.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\19019.00 moody - 267 3rd st\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\19019-MOODY-COUNTY.dwg PROPOSED AERIAL 3/4/2020THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:JRRMJ12-19-1919019.00RMJ525MOODY - 267 3RD STPROPOSED DOCK WITH DIMENSIONS48RMJ---02-15-2003-04-20---RMJJR---REVISED LABELSADDED BULKHEAD LINE, REV LABELS---03 OF 09AA05·SURVEY COURTESY OF:··SURVEY DATED:·THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY ANDARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.·ALL DATUM SHOWN HEREON IS REFERENCED TO MLW·APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPX LF):·EXISTING OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·WIDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW (APPX):·TIDAL DATUM:··MHW (NAVD)=··MLW (NAVD)=NOTES:·PROPOSED OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·TOTAL OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·TOTAL PROTRUSION FROM MHWL:·LOT WIDTH:"DAGOSTINO & WOOD, INC."01-08-19-1.66'0.32'34.07035023723747'34.07p:\19019.00 moody - 267 3rd st\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\19019-MOODY-COUNTY.dwg 3/4/2020PROPOSED 15'X15' LIFTRIPARIAN LINERIPARIAN LINEPROPOSED16'X16' LIFTPROPOSEDFIXED DOCK54'5'47'38'38'16'15'1.7 'MLWL = -0.5' (NAVD 1988)PROPERTY LINE &MHWL =-0.0' (NAVD 1988)ADJACENTDOCKADJACENT DOCKADJACENTPILINGSEXISTINGTOP OF BANKPLATTEDBULKHEADLINE. 3 ' 1'EDGE OF PILINGON RIPARIAN LINEEDGE OF PILINGON RIPARIAN LINE9.A.4.cPacket Pg. 524Attachment: Attachment B - Staff Exhibits (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) x - 9 .1x - 6 .9 - 6 .7 Xx - 4 .9 - 3 .6 xx - 3 .3x - 8.9 - 5.9 xx - 9.0 x - 8 . 3x - 8 .4x - 8 . 1x - 7 .9x - 4 .2 x - 2 . 8 x - 4 .5x - 1 .9 x - 2 .1x - 2 . 1x - 2 .7p:\19019.00 moody - 267 3rd st\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\19019-MOODY-COUNTY.dwg 3/4/2020NESW051020SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@turrell-associates.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\19019.00 moody - 267 3rd st\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\19019-MOODY-COUNTY.dwg PROPOSED AERIAL WITH DEPTHS 3/4/2020THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:JRRMJ12-19-1919019.00RMJ525MOODY - 267 3RD STPROPOSED DOCK WITH DEPTHS48RMJ---02-15-2003-04-20---JRJR---REVISED NOTESADDED BULKHEAD LINE---04 OF 09PROPOSED 15'X15' LIFTRIPARIAN LINEAA05RIPARIANLINEPROPOSED16X16 LIFTPROPERTYLINEEXISTINGTOP OF BANKMLWL = -0.5'(NAVD 1988)MHWL = -0.0'(NAVD 1988)·SURVEY COURTESY OF:··SURVEY DATED:·THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY ANDARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.·ALL DATUM SHOWN HEREON IS REFERENCED TO MLW·APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPX LF):·EXISTING OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·WIDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW (APPX):·TIDAL DATUM:··MHW (NAVD)=··MLW (NAVD)=NOTES:·PROPOSED OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·TOTAL OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·TOTAL PROTRUSION FROM MHWL:·LOT WIDTH:"DAGOSTINO & WOOD, INC."01-08-19-1.66'0.32'34.07035023723747'34.07PLATTEDBULKHEADLINE9.A.4.cPacket Pg. 525Attachment: Attachment B - Staff Exhibits (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) x - 4 . 9 - 5.9 xx - 4 . 5 0248SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@turrell-associates.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\19019.00 moody - 267 3rd st\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\19019-MOODY-COUNTY.dwg CROSS SECTION 3/4/2020THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:JRRMJ12-19-1919019.00-525MOODY - 267 3RD STCROSS SECTION48-------------------05 OF 0916' BOAT LIFT15' BOAT LIFT5'MHWL = +0.32' NAVDMLWL = -1.66' NAVDPROPOSED DOCKALL PILES TO BE WRAPPEDWITH PVC 1FT ABOVE MHWLAND 1FT BELOW SUBSTRATE9.A.4.cPacket Pg. 526Attachment: Attachment B - Staff Exhibits (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) p:\19019.00 moody - 267 3rd st\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\19019-MOODY-COUNTY.dwg 3/4/2020NESW02550100SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@turrell-associates.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\19019.00 moody - 267 3rd st\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\19019-MOODY-COUNTY.dwg SRS 3/4/2020THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:JRRMJ12-19-1919019.00RMJ525MOODY - 267 3RD STSUBMERGED RESOURCE SURVEY48----03-04-20----JR----ADDED BULKHEAD LINE----06 OF 09NO SEAGRASSES WEREOBSERVED GROWINGWITHIN 200 FT OF THEPROPOSED PROJECT200'200'10'9.A.4.cPacket Pg. 527Attachment: Attachment B - Staff Exhibits (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) p:\19019.00 moody - 267 3rd st\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\19019-MOODY-COUNTY.dwg 3/4/2020NESW03060120SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@turrell-associates.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\19019.00 moody - 267 3rd st\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\19019-MOODY-COUNTY.dwg ADJ DOCKS 3/4/2020THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:JRRMJ12-19-1919019.00RMJ525MOODY - 267 3RD STADJACENT DOCKS48----03-04-20----JR----ADDED BULKHEAD LINE----07 OF 09PROPOSEDFIXED DOCK& LIFTS25'36'46'47'47'47'43'43'39'52'54'50'47'9.A.4.cPacket Pg. 528Attachment: Attachment B - Staff Exhibits (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) p:\19019.00 moody - 267 3rd st\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\19019-MOODY-COUNTY.dwg 3/4/2020NESW03060120SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@turrell-associates.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\19019.00 moody - 267 3rd st\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\19019-MOODY-COUNTY.dwg ST OVERLAY 3/4/2020THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:JRRMJ12-19-1919019.00RMJ525MOODY - 267 3RD STST OVERLAY48----03-04-20----JR----ADDED BULKHEAD LINE----08 OF 09PROPOSEDFIXED DOCK& LIFTSST OVERLAY9.A.4.cPacket Pg. 529Attachment: Attachment B - Staff Exhibits (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) p:\19019.00 moody - 267 3rd st\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\19019-MOODY-COUNTY.dwg 3/4/2020NESW050100200SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@turrell-associates.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\19019.00 moody - 267 3rd st\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\19019-MOODY-COUNTY.dwg WOW 3/4/2020THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:JRRMJ12-19-1919019.00RMJ525MOODY - 267 3RD STWIDTH OF WATERWAY48----03-04-20----JR----ADDED BULKHEAD LINE----09 OF 09PROPOSEDFIXED DOCK& LIFTS350' WIDTH OFWATERWAY9.A.4.cPacket Pg. 530Attachment: Attachment B - Staff Exhibits (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) 9.A.4.c Packet Pg. 531 Attachment: Attachment B - Staff Exhibits (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) 9.A.4.c Packet Pg. 532 Attachment: Attachment B - Staff Exhibits (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) 7 3_, 421 Iv LAST REVISION: ZONING 2/ 10/ 2020 OTHER The Historic/ Archaeological Probability Maps are the official 1r : County source designating historic or archaeologic resources. 4. mNA1. 1N+ z O Ou C C 3/ z m' mm>>;zazz == m n mmz C ao0v a20Z 8506N 30 N_ Ilcn Z ANOD357N- 2555. 33' X03 x m " 7 s m m Z y a p''. Dr; w r o ulm m w n in 73Nn m l l co 0 D x ZONING NOTES m m co A 1 R- 82- 11- C a J 930 50 I coO 03 2 R- 87- 12C r I < 3 V- 88- 12 88- 282 I 1 Y 0° e s I m O CO o 0 0 I ` 8 1 m 6 3- 11- 97 V- 96- 33 97- 165 I S g' '+' v I 7 11- 19- 85 V- 85- 28C 85. 241 THIRD STREET WEST m J' 4 8 6. 25- 91 R• 91- 4 91- 54 I CO w I4,-_. G '• 1 O 9 6- 25- 91 PUD- 87- 12( 1) 91- 53 I O pN f'..''- 10 LDC- 91 1 m u 11 3- 5- 92 BD- 92- 1 92- 4 Z I a Q a, Cm 2 12 8- 6- 98 BD- 98- 28 98- 32 a L 133 m y 0- 1 a 13 12- 17- 92 8092. 9 92- 29 I O ( 7 - 311)' y C 14 5- 20- 93 8093- 5 93- 15 D I o! O j A m Q 15 5- 20- 93 BD- 93- 6 93- 14 I 03 `. iT. 0 16 11- 2393 V- 03- 29 93548 m I p -/ ww, 7. ?' ' O 17 12- 2- 93 BD- 93- 20 93- 37 7 CO OZ\ N 18 PDA- 85- 1, 2C 0) r fl IPA 19 PDA- 86- 17C 0 I m H 20 PDA- 86- 18C n I 07 O 0 " „© 0 A s s`.. 27 8- 2. 88 PDA- 08- 7 88- 63 C J 22 1- 25- 94 V- 9334 9436 r I 350' 23 3- 894 V- 94- 1 94- 158 u 24 10- 27- 87 PU- 87- 17C 87- 260 I O m O+ lit 25 5- 24- 94 PUD- 77- 19( 6) 94- 28 m Co I Z Ai w y' 26 6- 15- 95 8095- 1 95- 19 ID-' 1` 27 9- 7- 95 13095- 13 95- 31 I I-' o 28 9- 12- 95 V- 95- 12 95- 533 M i m74 lit 29 11- 2- 95 130- 95- 18 95- 47 m N w 30 12- 12- 95 R- 95- 8 95- 75 IC I 0332 9- 10- 96 V- 96- 131 1- 9- 96 - 86296- 419 0 96- 1I o 1„ m HCO m u v co 33 10- 3- 96 BD- 96- 15m96- 35 I O r w G-, y 34 11- 12- 96 PUD- 82- 11( 4) 96- 69 u J R Dow W N 0-, 35 12- 5- 96 BD- 96- 22 96- 46 I I m a - I Cm m a- 36 a w 36 12- 19- 96 BD- 96- 23 96- 47 I N y m I. G' w a 37 1- 14- 97 8097- 22 97- 50 C O v '" ON m O N mO 38 4- 3- 97 BD- 974 97- 12 I O I a m w a 39 4- 22- 97 CU- 97- 6 97- 223 I as zit' J 2 0 m 40 5- 15- 97 80- 97- 11 97- 18 O w 2 - a C 0> m y m 41 7- 3- 97 BD- 97- 16 97- 32 O= - v O m O O 2 G Z N w i 42 9- 457 BD- 97- 17 97- 36 O C 0 f3 y (' a 0 ) O O m 0 i III, '. 4 43 6- 4- 98 BD- 98- 10 98- 20 C v S1) 0 m z z 1 y H 73 44 5- 21- 98 BD- 98- 20 98- 25 z-1 r w O C m 0 m m 45 9- 17- 98 8D- 9830 98- 39 I' M CO 0 0a xi - 3< m m 1 m 46 9- 17- 98 P0198. 4 8- 38 0t zTl Oq w 03 1: 13 V D m ' 1 m - m 47 11- 5- 98 BD- 98- 32 98- 46 C 8/ 1o Om Ow a a , m; A i XI' -- 48 11- 5- 98 BD- 98. 34 98- 47 03 G < 0 Ca w n - n O Oy m 0 O 49 12- 17- 98 BD- 98- 38 98- 55 a m Oa O • n 8 7o m zyc° o 50 12- 3- 98 BD- 9836 98- 53 p 0) N w0^ 2 • a r m ° T 51 5- 11- 99 CU- 99- 4 99- 236 C Oo` w 1 N D7 1 52 6- 3- 99 BD- 993 99- 22 COC A w NO F w o w Q a Y F. p 53 8- 19- 99 8059- 16 99- 30 U1 w 0 mz 54 8- 5- 99 BD- 99- 12 99- 28 0) Cu y u 2 w ti a 1 I- 55 55 10. 26. 99 V- 99- 13 99- 400 I I I w > m 56 1- 20- 00 80. 99. 26 00- 01 I° i.- mpL. WEST AVENUEn 57 2- 8- 00 V99- 26 00. 51 T T O 58 3- 14- 00 V- 99- 27 00. 85 0 < 2 zi 59 2- 17- 00 BD- 99. 26 00- 03 m m 0 m m 0 w u 0 a , 0 0 XI< 60 5- 4- 00 BD- 00- 9 00- 5 y T w a w D 61 6- 1- 00 BD- 00- 8 00- 16 m J 0 r O 62 5- 23- 00 CU- 00- 1 00- 157 0 S ,,, - S . 0 w o m w O 63 7- 20- 00 B0- 00- 13 00- 19 Qe© CO J CO J 70 64 9. 7- 00 BD- 00- 18 00- 25 NCS, 0 A i y "' "' m a 65 10- 10- 00 V- 00. 18 00353 m ' al w m w' C1' n, a m - V o t O, tik 66 0 BD- 00- 26 0034 1 W. l N 68 5- 3- 01 - AR341 01- 09 a w m a a N m m o 68 6- 26- 010- PUDA- 01- AR- 546D11201- 55 m m/ P AO " Om 2(") 0 6910. 4- 01 BD- 01- AR- 1122 01- 25 4111111•401114:;• 41",, m ` 1 w J 70 4- 4- 02 BD- 01- AR- 1608 02- 03 N 0 m 0 — " w m iri 71 9- 5- 02 BD- 02- AR- 2416 02- 06A72 9- 16- 02 BD- 02- AR- 2564 02- OS D () E `" m "' ® 0a - 73 12- 19- 02 BD- 02- AR- 3079 02- 10 Z O-< T= dilLWfST DRIVE w a m 0 74 2- 5- 04 BD- 03- AR- 4689 04. 02 C7 T w 75 7- 15- 04 BD- 04- AR- 5697 04. 081+ 0 m 76 7- 15- 04 BD- 04- AR- 5699 04- 07Xm m D w a7T 7 14- 04 BD- 04- AR 5693 04 06 m Z m r I\ 06108 m m- m 82 5- 23- 06 P306- 22 Z r mzm w . EAST fyORiv m o 83 4- 19- 07 BD- 06- AR- 10900 07- 04 ( 7 r VALLEY m g m 84 5- 17- 07 BD- 06- AR- 11004 07- 05 my= m Co y- m a 1111111, DRIVE m 85 12- 6- 07 BD- 07- AR- 12154 07- 08 m. Z)-<-- w m 86 4- 22- 08 ADA- 07- AR- 12714 4 08- 119 I 11111111 m w m m w88 5-.- 10 BD- PL- 09- 11 08- 05 . Zml O Im- C W 0 - G' a 88 5- 6- 10 BD- PL- 09918 10- 02 m Z 0 7 I J TO m a v > 89 12- 2- 10 BD- PL- 10- 1297 10- 06 C+ Z1 . Z7 C —. e- w - A o w ICO 0 r m w 90 2- 3- 11 BD- PL- 10- 1313 11- 01Z Z m m 0 w t3 - A 0 91 2- 22- 11 PUDA- PL- 09- 742 11- 04 z• 0> D m- I s $ u 0 , u O m H N 92 9- 6- 12 BD- PL- 12- 26 12- 07 Z Z X 2 2_ 0 2X 0 CO to CO z CO 93 10- 6- 11 BD- PL- 10- 1473 11- 06 Q> 0 Z)( p a 2 O A r It p :' y _ m A m — 94 7- 20- 16 VA- PL- 15- 2429 I a m m_ m 0 z m w m Ir m m AND 80- PL- 1537 HEX- 16- 25 m a t. w O O m i m m - m 95 12- 20- 17 BD- PL- 16- 541 HEX- 17- 35 I Z- I 2 w Iy11 F E O 0 m a m 1 .-+ m 96 9- 11- 18 PUDA- PL- 17- 4421 18- 41 m' p> z N N < - E O m'- 97 1- 18- 19 BDE- PL- 17- 2736 HEX 19- 02 Z a y u(` o, ; i N y tI m m w m m 98 2- 21- 19 VA- PL- 18- 2673 HEX 19- 08 a c. a D D 73 I m m ., 99 1- 29- 20 BDE- PL- 18- 3700 HEX 20- 02 q) C 0 0 m a m y w a 100 1- 29- 20 VA- PL- 17- 1588 HEX 20- 03 C Z, 1. m 1 m 0 0 w 0 w 101 1- 28- 20 PUDA- PL- 19- 502 20- 07 1' I > t.• m73 ITI w 7.. i. 0 0 a w w a m ie W m m e C N C+ C D J l CN- 1' I C• T el0 0J P aO a m a,- C/ a w() DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS MODIFICATIONS 6 N - 1 0 12- 12- 95 R- 95- B 95- 75 Z? m m m m 2 N 2 Hw m w W V N m - FOREST AVENUE 2 4 Z m w y 17, w m M w m m m — ti m M M a m o y 2 N O a y m m y m v m u m u m m o l 2 u.,.,_ 1 4.4.,_ ly- w . U'm Y m XI mymmP qWV^• ILI DZ = EMI F a p a a a a 0 a iiii m w 2o c+ 1a N N N C 0 o ` k - 4 u - 3 13 N - m - fit VANDERBILT DRIVE( CR901) Ir m 1 1 p m D m " 0 y v n. K o Z Iii 01 al - 1 X , . q` 4G CCJ1 m Z 0 0 u N i t Z •• 0 < fr- y f3 LEE COUNTY N M O y 9.A.4.c Packet Pg. 533 Attachment: Attachment B - Staff Exhibits (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) KellyJohn From: Sent To: Cc: Subiect: Attachments: KellyJohn Friday, May 22,2020 2:15 PM KellyJohn BellowsRay BDE-P120190001962 and VA-P120190002360 - CCPC 06-11-20 SZA 07-14-2020 Public Hearing Sign Posting FF04ED7A-C8A8-4081 -AAEl -DBDD0D1 214A3 jpeg; 41 AC0C80-F73D-4EC4-9574- E7 6s821 5D222 jpeg; 0 1 D24359 -7 67 4 -4006-91 87- DA86C27 D37 DE jpeg Required public hearing signs for the referenced meetings were posted by me, one adjacent to the roadway at 257 3rd Street W -Lot 8 and the other waterfront, at approximately 12:00 P.M. this date as evidenced by the attached photographs. Respectfully, John Kelly senior Planner Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. lf you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. lnstead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. 1 9.A.4.c Packet Pg. 534 Attachment: Attachment B - Staff Exhibits (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) I t frs I -' i ar- .. I h 2 bf \ -.i I '.tt 9.A.4.c Packet Pg. 535 Attachment: Attachment B - Staff Exhibits (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) PUBLIC HEARING FOR Bo.t Oock Ertentlon Io Aib a a, l@l Ptsit-sr Pcddon l{o. m$lii!il79f,2 CCPC: Jun. ll, 2020.r g A.X.to VARIAilCE P.tlton t{o. 201 9000236l, CCPrC: Jun 11, 20im I A.ll. BCC: Juay trt, 2020 .r g A.f. Cotllar Co{nty Govamrnant Cantat - 3rfe9 f.ml..ml Tr.lt Er.l - 3d FloorCO Joln xatty. s.nE Pr..ne. \z}gt Z52.5t E DA ,q , t I f.t t .:'r iI,ft .)a .'l 9.A.4.c Packet Pg. 536 Attachment: Attachment B - Staff Exhibits (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 537 Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 538 Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 539 Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 540 Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 541 Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 542 Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) PRIMARY CRITERIA The following criteria, pursuant to LDC section 5.03.06, shall be used as a guide by staff in determining its recommendation to the Office of the Hearing Examiner. The Hearing Examiner will utilize the following criteria as a guide in the decision to approve or deny a particular Dock Extension request. In order for the Hearing Examiner to approve the request, it must be determined that at least 4 of the 5 primary criteria, and at least 4 of the 6 secondary criteria, must be met. On separate sheets, please provide a narrative response to the listed criteria and/or questions. 1. Whether or not the number of dock facilities and/or boat slips proposed is appropriate in relation to the waterfront length, location, upland land use, and zoning of the subject property; consideration should be made of property on unbridged barrier islands, where vessels are the primary means of transportation to and from the property. (The number should be appropriate; typical, single-family use should be no more than two slips; typical multi-family use should be one slip per dwelling unit; in the case of unbridged barrier island docks, additional slips may be appropriate.) The subject property is zoned as a single-family residential property which warrants no more than 2 slips per the CC-LDC. The proposed project consists of one dock with two boatlifts to accommodate two vessels up to 38-feet. The proposed dock extends out 47-feet from the MHWL therefore we are requesting a 27-foot boat dock extension from the allowed 20-feet. 2. Whether or not the water depth at the proposed site is so shallow that a vessel of the general length, type, and draft as that described in the petitioner’s application is unable to launch or moor at mean low tide (MLT). (The petitioner’s application and survey should show that the water depth is too shallow to allow launch and mooring of the vessel (s) described without an extension.) The reason for this BDE request is based on the upland property location and size due to limited shoreline to design a dock as well as the size of the vessels the owner/applicant is proposing to store on the dock. The dock has been designed to be consistent with all the other docks previously approved along this shoreline. 3. Whether or not the proposed dock facility may have an adverse impact on navigation within an adjacent marked or charted navigable channel. (The facility should not intrude into any marked or charted navigable channel thus impeding vessel traffic in the channel.) The proposed docking facility is consistent with the other docks along the subject shoreline. As proposed the dock and boatlifts will not impact navigation as some of the adjacent neighboring docks extend out past what the applicant is requesting within this BDE. 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 543 Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) 4. Whether or not the proposed dock facility protrudes no more than 25 percent of the width of the waterway, and whether or not a minimum of 50 percent of the waterway width between dock facilities on either side of the waterway is maintained for navigability. (The facility should maintain the required percentages.) The approximate waterway width is 350-feet wide. The proposed dock protrusion is 47-feet which is under 14% width of the waterway. 5. Whether or not the proposed location and design of the dock facility is such that the facility would not interfere with the use of neighboring docks. (The facility should not interfere with the use of legally permitted neighboring docks.) The proposed docking facility originates from an upland boat dock lot with no residential building along the subject shoreline. Due to this no neighboring views or access will be negatively impacted as the proposed dock is consist with all the previously approved docks along the subject shoreline. 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 544 Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) SECONDARY CRITERIA 1. Whether or not there are special conditions, not involving water depth, related to the subject property or waterway, which justify the proposed dimensions and location of the proposed dock facility. (There must be at least one special condition related to the property; these may include type of shoreline reinforcement, shoreline configuration, mangrove growth, or seagrass beds.) The properties along the subject shoreline are boat dock lots which are allowed two boat-slips like a typical single-family lot however these lots have a very limited riparian area to design/construct a docking facility that can accommodate two boatlifts. Additionally, the amount of shoreline does not provide enough space to conform with the required setbacks of 7.5-feet. 2. Whether the proposed dock facility would allow reasonable, safe, access to the vessel for loading/unloading and routine maintenance, without the use of excessive deck area not directly related to these functions. (The facility should not use excessive deck area.) The proposed docking facility is 5-feet wide by 47-long and will consist of 270 square feet of decking. As designed this dock is consistent with the other previously approved docks along this shoreline and will provide enough space for typical access and maintenance of the vessels on-site. 3. For single-family dock facilities, whether or not the length of the vessel, or vessels in combination, described by the petitioner exceeds 50 percent of the subject property’s linear waterfront footage. (The applicable maximum percentage should be maintained.) N/A 4. Whether or not the proposed facility would have a major impact on the waterfront view of neighboring waterfront property owners. (The facility should not have a major impact on the view of either property owner.) As proposed the dock has been designed within the designated property lines and is consistent with others on this waterway. Therefore, no impacts to neighboring property views of the waterway will result from the proposed project. 5. Whether or not seagrass beds are located within 200 feet of the proposed dock facility. (If seagrass beds are present, compliance with LDC subsection 5.03.06 I must be demonstrated.) There are no seagrass beds present on the property nor the neighboring properties within 200’ of the existing dock structure 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 545 Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) 6. Whether or not the proposed dock facility is subject to the manatee protection requirements of LDC subsection 5.03.06 E.11. (If applicable, compliance with subsection 5.03.06.E.11 must be demonstrated.) The proposed work is for a single-family docking facility and therefore not subject to Manatee Protection Requirements 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 546 Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 547 Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 548 Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 549 Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) Asset Purchase Letter - IRA P.O. Box 451340, Westlake, OH 44145 | Phone: 888-382-4727 | Fax: 440.366.3750 | help@trustetc.com January 3, 2020 To Whom It May Concern: This letter is to confirm that Equity Trust Company (“Equity”) is the Custodian of the William Moody Self-Directed Individual Retirement Account (IRA). The IRA was opened with Equity on 1/17/2012, and William Moody’s IRA is currently in full force and effect, and has not been amended or revoked. This letter authorizes William Moody to purchase or sell assets in the name of Equity Trust Company for the benefit of their IRA. It is permissible for William Moody to sign agreements or other documents on behalf of their IRA. Although Equity may be asked to sign certain documents relating to the purchase, we reserve the right to refuse and/or request William Moody to sign documents on behalf of their IRA. Any asset that William Moody purchases or sells for their IRA must be titled as follows: “Equity Trust Company Custodian FBO William Moody IRA.” William Moody does not have authority to purchase assets solely in the name “Equity Trust Company.” Equity Trust Company serves as a passive, non-discretionary custodian of customer directed IRAs. As a passive custodian, Equity Trust Company does not solicit investments, nor do we provide advice or recommendations, to our customers with regard to their investments, acquired by or in, their IRA. As a passive custodian, Equity Trust Company has no authority to take any action with regard to their investments acquired by, or held in, their IRA without the express direction of the IRA owner. If you have any questions, please contact Equity Trust Company directly at 888-382-4727 or via e-mail at help@trustetc.com. Sincerely, Rachel Cain Corporate Alternate Signer Equity Trust Company Equity Trust Company is a passive custodian and does not provide tax, legal or investment advice. Any information communicated by Equity Trust Company is for educational purposes only, and should not be construed as tax, legal or investment advice. Whenever making an investment decision, please consult with your tax attorney or financial professional. 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 550 Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 ADDRESSING CHECKLIST Please complete the following and email to GMD_Addressing@colliergov.net or fax to the Operations Department at 239-252-5724 or submit in person to the Addressing Department at the above address. Form must be signed by Addressing personnel prior to pre-application meeting, please allow 3 days for processing. Not all items will apply to every project. Items in bold type are required. FOLIO NUMBERS MUST BE PROVIDED. F orms older than 6 months will require additional review and approval by the Addressing Department. PETITION TYPE (Indicate type below, complete a separate Addressing Checklist for each Petition type) BL (Blasting Permit) BD (Boat Dock Extension) Carnival/Circus Permit CU (Conditional Use) EXP (Excavation Permit) FP (Final Plat LLA (Lot Line Adjustment) PNC (Project Name Change) PPL (Plans & Plat Review) PSP (Preliminary Subdivision Plat) PUD Rezone RZ (Standard Rezone) SDP (Site Development Plan) SDPA (SDP Amendment) SDPI (Insubstantial Change to SDP) SIP (Site Im provement Plan) SIPI (Insubstantial Change to SIP) SNR (Street Name Change) SNC (Street Name Change – Unplatted) T DR (Transfer of Development Rights) VA (Variance) VRP (Vegetation Removal Permit) VRSFP (Vegetation Removal & Site Fill Permit) OTHER LEGAL DESCRIPTION of subject property or properties (copy of lengthy description may be attached) FOLIO (Property ID) NUMBER(s) of above (attach to, or associate with, legal description if more than one) STREET ADDRESS or ADDRESSES (as applicable, if already assigned) PROPOSED STREET NAMES (if applicable) SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NUMBER (for existing projects/sites only) 1 SURVEY (copy - needed only for unplatted properties) LOCATION MAP must be attached showing exact location of project/site in relation to nearest public road right- of-way PROPOSED PROJECT NAME (if applicable) SDP - or AR or PL # 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 551 Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 Please Return Approved Checklist By: Email Personally picked up Applicant Name: Signature on Addressing Checklist does not constitute Project and/or Street Name approval and is subject to further review by the Operations Department. FOR STAFF USE ONLY Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Approved by: Date: Updated by: Date: IF OLDER THAN 6 MONTHS, FORM MUST BE UPDATED OR NEW FORM SUBMITTED 2 Fax Email/Fax:Phone: Project or development names proposed for, or already appearing in, condominium documents (if application; indicate whether proposed or existing) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 552 Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 553 Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) STATE OF FLORIDACOUNTY AERIAL VICINITY MAPSTATE OF FLORIDACOUNTY AERIAL VICINITY MAPNOTES:<> THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SUBJECTPROPERTYSUBJECTPROPERTY<> LATITUDE:N 26.326931<> LONGITUDE:W 81.831553SITE ADDRESS:<> 267 3RD ST W, LOT #8BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@turrell-associates.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\19019.00 moody - 267 3rd st\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\19019-MOODY-COUNTY.dwg LOCATION 3/4/2020THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:JRRMJ12-19-1919019.00RMJ525MOODY - 267 3RD STLOCATION MAP48RMJ---02-15-2003-04-20---JRJR---SHEET 03SHEETS 2-4, 6-9---01 OF 09COLLIER COUNTYCOLLIER COUNTY)7.(1(/':+%1)7.(1(/':+%18588288641MARCOISLANDEVERGLADESCITY9329846NAPLES90908399483783784129292983983992887846951862I-758486431856850846890896NESWKEY WESTTAMPAFT.MYERSMIAMINAPLESSUBJECTPROPERTY9.A.4.dPacket Pg. 554Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) x - 9 .1x - 6 . 9 - 6 . 7 Xx - 4 . 9 - 3 .6 xx - 3 . 3 x - 8 . 9 - 5 . 9 x x - 9 .0x - 9 . 9 x - 8 . 3 x - 9 . 5 x - 8 . 9 x - 8 . 3 x - 8 . 4 x - 8 . 1x - 7 . 9 x - 4 . 2 x - 2 . 8 x - 4 . 5x - 1 . 9 x - 2 . 1 x - 2 .1x - 2 . 7 NESW081632SCALE IN FEETSITE ADDRESS:,267 3RD ST W, LOT #8BONITA SPRINGSFL34134Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@turrell-associates.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\19019.00 moody - 267 3rd st\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\19019-MOODY-COUNTY.dwg EXISTING AERIAL 3/4/2020THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:JRRMJ12-19-1919019.00RMJ525MOODY - 267 3RD STEXISTING CONDITIONS48----03-04-20----JR----ADDED BULKHEAD LINE----02 OF 09·SURVEY COURTESY OF:··SURVEY DATED:·THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY ANDARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.·ALL DATUM SHOWN HEREON IS REFERENCED TO MLW·APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPX LF):·EXISTING OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·WIDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW (APPX):·TIDAL DATUM:··MHW (NAVD)=··MLW (NAVD)=NOTES:"DAGOSTINO & WOOD, INC."01-08-19-1.66'0.32'34.0703503RD ST WMLWL = -0.5'(NAVD 1988)MHWL = -0.0'(NAVD 1988)EXISTINGTOP OF BANKPROPERTYLINERIPARIAN LINERIPARIAN LINEPLATTEDBULKHEADLINE9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 555 Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) p:\19019.00 moody - 267 3rd st\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\19019-MOODY-COUNTY.dwg 3/4/2020NESW051020SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@turrell-associates.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\19019.00 moody - 267 3rd st\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\19019-MOODY-COUNTY.dwg PROPOSED AERIAL 3/4/2020THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:JRRMJ12-19-1919019.00RMJ525MOODY - 267 3RD STPROPOSED DOCK WITH DIMENSIONS48RMJ---02-15-2003-04-20---RMJJR---REVISED LABELSADDED BULKHEAD LINE, REV LABELS---03 OF 09AA05·SURVEY COURTESY OF:··SURVEY DATED:·THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY ANDARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.·ALL DATUM SHOWN HEREON IS REFERENCED TO MLW·APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPX LF):·EXISTING OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·WIDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW (APPX):·TIDAL DATUM:··MHW (NAVD)=··MLW (NAVD)=NOTES:·PROPOSED OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·TOTAL OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·TOTAL PROTRUSION FROM MHWL:·LOT WIDTH:"DAGOSTINO & WOOD, INC."01-08-19-1.66'0.32'34.07035023723747'34.07p:\19019.00 moody - 267 3rd st\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\19019-MOODY-COUNTY.dwg 3/4/2020PROPOSED 15'X15' LIFTRIPARIAN LINERIPARIAN LINEPROPOSED16'X16' LIFTPROPOSEDFIXED DOCK54'5'47'38'38'16'15'1.7 'MLWL = -0.5' (NAVD 1988)PROPERTY LINE &MHWL =-0.0' (NAVD 1988)ADJACENTDOCKADJACENT DOCKADJACENTPILINGSEXISTINGTOP OF BANKPLATTEDBULKHEADLINE. 3 ' 1 'EDGE OF PILINGON RIPARIAN LINEEDGE OF PILINGON RIPARIAN LINE9.A.4.dPacket Pg. 556Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) x - 9 .1x - 6 .9 - 6 .7 Xx - 4 .9 - 3 .6 xx - 3 .3x - 8 .9 - 5 .9 xx - 9 . 0 x - 8 . 3x - 8 .4x - 8 . 1x - 7 .9x - 4 .2 x - 2 . 8 x - 4 .5x - 1 .9 x - 2 .1x - 2 . 1x - 2 .7p:\19019.00 moody - 267 3rd st\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\19019-MOODY-COUNTY.dwg 3/4/2020NESW051020SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@turrell-associates.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\19019.00 moody - 267 3rd st\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\19019-MOODY-COUNTY.dwg PROPOSED AERIAL WITH DEPTHS 3/4/2020THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:JRRMJ12-19-1919019.00RMJ525MOODY - 267 3RD STPROPOSED DOCK WITH DEPTHS48RMJ---02-15-2003-04-20---JRJR---REVISED NOTESADDED BULKHEAD LINE---04 OF 09PROPOSED 15'X15' LIFTRIPARIAN LINEAA05RIPARIANLINEPROPOSED16X16 LIFTPROPERTYLINEEXISTINGTOP OF BANKMLWL = -0.5'(NAVD 1988)MHWL = -0.0'(NAVD 1988)·SURVEY COURTESY OF:··SURVEY DATED:·THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY ANDARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.·ALL DATUM SHOWN HEREON IS REFERENCED TO MLW·APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPX LF):·EXISTING OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·WIDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW (APPX):·TIDAL DATUM:··MHW (NAVD)=··MLW (NAVD)=NOTES:·PROPOSED OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·TOTAL OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·TOTAL PROTRUSION FROM MHWL:·LOT WIDTH:"DAGOSTINO & WOOD, INC."01-08-19-1.66'0.32'34.07035023723747'34.07PLATTEDBULKHEADLINE9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 557 Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) x - 4 . 9 - 5.9 xx - 4 . 5 0248SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@turrell-associates.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\19019.00 moody - 267 3rd st\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\19019-MOODY-COUNTY.dwg CROSS SECTION 3/4/2020THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:JRRMJ12-19-1919019.00-525MOODY - 267 3RD STCROSS SECTION48-------------------05 OF 0916' BOAT LIFT15' BOAT LIFT5'MHWL = +0.32' NAVDMLWL = -1.66' NAVDPROPOSED DOCKALL PILES TO BE WRAPPEDWITH PVC 1FT ABOVE MHWLAND 1FT BELOW SUBSTRATE9.A.4.dPacket Pg. 558Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) p:\19019.00 moody - 267 3rd st\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\19019-MOODY-COUNTY.dwg 3/4/2020NESW02550100SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@turrell-associates.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\19019.00 moody - 267 3rd st\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\19019-MOODY-COUNTY.dwg SRS 3/4/2020THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:JRRMJ12-19-1919019.00RMJ525MOODY - 267 3RD STSUBMERGED RESOURCE SURVEY48----03-04-20----JR----ADDED BULKHEAD LINE----06 OF 09NO SEAGRASSES WEREOBSERVED GROWINGWITHIN 200 FT OF THEPROPOSED PROJECT200'200'10'9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 559 Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) p:\19019.00 moody - 267 3rd st\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\19019-MOODY-COUNTY.dwg 3/4/2020NESW03060120SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@turrell-associates.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\19019.00 moody - 267 3rd st\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\19019-MOODY-COUNTY.dwg ADJ DOCKS 3/4/2020THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:JRRMJ12-19-1919019.00RMJ525MOODY - 267 3RD STADJACENT DOCKS48----03-04-20----JR----ADDED BULKHEAD LINE----07 OF 09PROPOSEDFIXED DOCK& LIFTS25'36'46'47'47'47'43'43'39'52'54'50'47'9.A.4.dPacket Pg. 560Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) p:\19019.00 moody - 267 3rd st\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\19019-MOODY-COUNTY.dwg 3/4/2020NESW03060120SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@turrell-associates.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\19019.00 moody - 267 3rd st\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\19019-MOODY-COUNTY.dwg ST OVERLAY 3/4/2020THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:JRRMJ12-19-1919019.00RMJ525MOODY - 267 3RD STST OVERLAY48----03-04-20----JR----ADDED BULKHEAD LINE----08 OF 09PROPOSEDFIXED DOCK& LIFTSST OVERLAY9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 561 Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) p:\19019.00 moody - 267 3rd st\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\19019-MOODY-COUNTY.dwg 3/4/2020NESW050100200SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@turrell-associates.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\19019.00 moody - 267 3rd st\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\19019-MOODY-COUNTY.dwg WOW 3/4/2020THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:JRRMJ12-19-1919019.00RMJ525MOODY - 267 3RD STWIDTH OF WATERWAY48----03-04-20----JR----ADDED BULKHEAD LINE----09 OF 09PROPOSEDFIXED DOCK& LIFTS350' WIDTH OFWATERWAY9.A.4.dPacket Pg. 562Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 563 Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) MOODY DOCK 267 3RD STREET, LOT #8 NAPLES, FL 34134 SUBMERGED RESOURCE SURVEY JULY 8, 2019 PREPARED BY: TURRELL, HALL & ASSOCIATES, INC 3584 EXCHANGE AVENUE, STE B NAPLES, FL 34104 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 564 Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) MOODY DOCK SUBMERGED RESOURCE SURVEY JULY 8, 2019 Page 1 of 5 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Moody dock project is located at 267 3rd Street West, Lot #8 in Bonita Springs, FL and is identified by Collier County as Parcel Number 56000960000. The property is located on just south of Bonita Beach Road on a boat dock lot within Section 05, Township 48 South, and Range 25 East. The upland portion of the property is currently vacant with two designated parking places and a natural shoreline. The neighboring properties both have docking facilities that accommodate two vessels as allowed per the local zoning. Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. was contracted to design and permit a docking facility and a part of that is to conduct a Submerged Resource Survey (SRS) which was completed on July 8, 2019. This survey provides planning and review assistance to both the owners and the agency reviewers, regarding the proposed project and location of the proposed dock. The field visit for the SRS was conducted on July 8, 2019 at 10:30 A.M. High tide took place at 6:50am (2.0’) that morning with low tide occurring at 12:53pm (0.7’). With an outgoing tide and fresh west to southwest winds and mostly cloudy skies resulted in fair underwater visibility that ranged from 2-4 feet. Surface water conditions on this day were relatively calm which also helped to provide good environmental conditions for the survey. The water temperature was 85°F on the date of the survey. 2.0 OBJECTIVE The objective of the submerged resource survey was to identify and locate any existing submerged resources within the footprint of the proposed project. The survey provided onsite environmental information to help determine if the proposed project would impact any existing submerged resources and if so, would assist in reconfiguring the proposed dock in order to minimize any impacts. The general scope of work performed at the site is summarized below. • Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. personnel conducted a site visit and snorkeled within the proposed project footprint and expanded out 200-feet from the site in order to document the location of any submerged resources. • Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. personnel identified submerged resources at the site, estimated the % of coverage, and delineated the approximate limits of any submerged resources observed. • Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. personnel delineated limits via a handheld GPS (Garmin Model 72H). 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 565 Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) MOODY DOCK SUBMERGED RESOURCE SURVEY JULY 8, 2019 Page 2 of 5 3.0 METHODOLOGY Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. biologists intentionally designed the methodology of the SRS to cover the entire subject property shoreline and extend out past the extent of the proposed docking facility. The components for this survey included: ●Review of past aerials and past surveys completed near or adjacent to the subject property ●Review of aerial photography of survey area ●Physically snorkel sites, GPS locate limits of submerged resources, and determine approximate percent of coverage ● Document and photograph all findings The surveyed area was evaluated systematically by following the established transects which were spaced approximately 10-15 feet apart within the proposed dock footprint as shown on the attached exhibit. The survey was expanded out 200-feet from the proposed docking facility in order to verify no other resources were within the surrounding waterway. The neighboring properties have existing docks which helped to provide easily identifiable reference markers, such as dock piles which assisted in locating transects and keeping them consistent throughout most of the survey area. Two biologists from Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. surveyed the site wading in the shallow areas and using snorkel equipment within the deeper areas. Located submerged resources were photographed, the approximate percent of coverage was quantified, and their approximate location was delineated on an aerial photo and then confirmed via handheld GPS (Garmin Model 72 H). A half meter square quadrant, further broken into sections to make coverage estimates more measureable was used on site. Random placements of the quadrate would be completed within any observed seagrass beds and the individual results were compiled into an average estimated coverage for the seagrass beds. The findings are shown on the attached exhibit. 4.0 RESULTS The survey was completed on July 9, 2019 during an outgoing tide which again resulted in little findings within the riparian rights of the subject property and extending outside the project area. The survey revealed no natural marine resources within the project area. The substrate observed within the surveyed area was consistent throughout the entire area which included two classifications; silt/sand with shell debris and a silt/muck material extending out past the limits of the proposed docking facility. Additionally, various algae were observed including filamentous algae and other macro algae scattered throughout the surveyed area. Numerous marine species were also 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 566 Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) MOODY DOCK SUBMERGED RESOURCE SURVEY JULY 8, 2019 Page 3 of 5 observed during the survey. A list of these species has been prepared and is provided below as Table 1. Table 1 – Observed Marine Species 5.0 CONCLUSIONS The submerged resource survey conducted at the project site yielded few findings at best. Barnacles, mud crabs, and oyster debris could be seen along the base of the scattered shoreline rip-rap and growing on the neighboring dock piles. Seagrasses nor any live oysters were observed growing within the project footprint. Based off our observations it is THA’s opinion that no impacts to any submerged resources will occur with the proposed project. Scattered rip-rap shoreline with Oyster debris Common Name Scientific Name Mangrove Snapper Lutjanus Griseus Sheepshead Archosargus Probatocephalus Striped Mullet Mugil Cephalus Snook Centrompus Undecimalis Glass Minnow Anchoa Mitchilli 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 567 Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) MOODY DOCK SUBMERGED RESOURCE SURVEY JULY 8, 2019 Page 4 of 5 Barnacle and Oysters observed growing on adjacent dock piles Barnacle and submerged oyster debris 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 568 Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) MOODY DOCK SUBMERGED RESOURCE SURVEY JULY 8, 2019 Page 5 of 5 Upland portion of property 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 569 Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) www.dep.state.fl.us FLORIDA DEPARTMENT O F Environmental Protection South District Post Office Box 2549 Fort Myers, Florida 33902-2549 SouthDistrict@FloridaDEP.gov Ron DeSantis Governor Jeanette Nuñez Lt. Governor Noah Valenstein Secretary Permittee/Authorized Entity: Braun Moody 1230 Clover Lane Matthews, NC 28104 Dock with Two Covered Lifts Authorized Agent: Jeff Rogers 3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104 jeff@thanaples.com Environmental Resource Permit State-owned Submerged Lands Authorization – Granted U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Authorization – Not Included Permit No.: 0373834-003 EI Permit Issuance Date: September 11, 2019, 2019 Permit Construction Phase Expiration Date: September 11, 2019, 2024 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 570 Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) Permittee: Moody Permit Expiration: September 11, 2024 Permit No: 0373834-003 EI Page 2 of 14 Environmental Resource Permit Permittee: Moody Permit No: 0373834-003 EI PROJECT LOCATION The activities authorized by this permit are located at 267 3rd St. W, Lot 8, 56000960000, Bonita Springs, Florida 34134, in Section 5, Township 48, Range 25, in Collier County. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The permittee is authorized to construct a dock with two covered lifts for a total overwater structure of approximately 1400 square feet in Little Hickory Bay, Class II Outstanding Florida Waters, Unclassified for shellfish harvesting. AUTHORIZATIONS Dock with Two Covered Lifts Environmental Resource Permit The Department has determined that the activity qualifies for an Environmental Resource Permit. Therefore, the Environmental Resource Permit is hereby granted, pursuant to Part IV of Chapter 373, Florida Statutes (F.S.), and Chapter 62 -330, Flor ida Administrative Code (F.A.C.). Sovereignty Submerged Lands Authorization The Department acts as staff to the Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Tru st Fund (Board of Trustees) and issues certain authorizations for the use of sovereign submerged lands. The Department has the authority to review activities on sovereign submerged lands under Chapters 253 and 258 of the Florida Statutes, and Chapters 18 -18, 18-20, and 18-21, Florida Administrative Code, as applicable. The activity appears to be located on sovereign submerged lands owned by the Board of Trustees. The activity is not exempt from the need to obtain the applicable proprietary authorization. As staff to the Board of Trustees, the Department has reviewed the activity described above, and has determined that the activity qualifies for a letter of consent under Rule 18-21.005(1)(c), Florida Administrative Code, and Section 253.77 of the F lorida Statutes to construct and use the activity on the specified sovereign submerged lands and as long as the work performed is located within the boundaries as described herein and is consistent with the terms and conditions herein. During this term of this Letter of consent you shall maintain satisfactory evidence of sufficient upland interest as required by paragraph 18-21.004(3)(b), Florida Administrative Code. If such interest is terminated or the Board of Trustees determines that such interest did not exist on the date of issuance of this Letter of Consent, this Letter of Consent may be terminated by the Board of Trustees at its sole option. If the Board of Trustees terminates this Letter of Consent, you agree not to assert a clai m or defense against the Board of Trustees arising out of this Letter of Consent. 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 571 Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) Permittee: Moody Permit Expiration: September 11, 2024 Permit No: 0373834-003 EI Page 3 of 14 Federal Authorization Your proposed activity as outlined on your application and attached drawings does not qualify for Federal authorization pursuant to the State Programmatic General Permit and a SEPARATE permit or authorization shall be required from the Corps. You must apply separately to the Corps using their APPLICATION FOR DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT, ENG FORM 4345, or alternative as allowed by their regulations. More information on Corps permitting may be found online in the Jacksonville District Regulatory Division Source Book at: https://www.saj.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory/Source-Book/. Authority for review - an agreement with the USACOE entitled “Coordination Agreement Between the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers (Jacksonville District) and the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, or Duly Authorized Designee, State Programmatic General Permit”, Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbor Act of 1899, and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Coastal Zone Management Issuance of this authorization also constitut es a finding of consistency with Florida's Coastal Zone Management Program, as required by Section 307 of the Coastal Zone Management Act. Water Quality Certification This permit also constitutes a water quality certification under Section 401 of the Clea n Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1341. Other Authorizations You are advised that authorizations or permits for this activity may be required by other federal, state, regional, or local entities including but not limited to local governments or municipalities. This permit does not relieve you from the requirements to obtain all other required permits or authorizations. The act ivity described may be conducted only in accordance with the terms, conditions and attachments contained in this document. Issuance and granting of the permit and authorizations herein do not infer, nor guarantee, nor imply that future permits, authorizations, or modifications will be granted by the Department. PERMIT CONDITIONS The activities described must be conducted in accordance with: • The Specific Conditions • The General Conditions • The limits, conditions and locations of work shown in the attached drawings • The term limits of this authorization You are advised to read and understand these conditions and drawings prior to beginning the authorized activities, and to ensure the work is conducted in conformance with all the terms, conditions, and drawings herein. If you are using a contractor, the contractor also should read and understand these conditions and drawings prior to beginning any activity. Failure to comply 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 572 Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) Permittee: Moody Permit Expiration: September 11, 2024 Permit No: 0373834-003 EI Page 4 of 14 with these conditions, including any mitigation requirements, shall be grounds for the Department to revoke the permit and authorization and to take appropriate enforcement action. Operation of the facility is not authorized except when determined to be in conformance with all applicable rules and this permit, as described. SPECIFIC CONDITIONS – ADMINISTRATIVE 1. All required submittals, such as certifications, monitoring reports, notifications, etc., shall be submitted to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, South District Office, Submerged Lands and Environmental Resource Permitting, P.O. Box 2549, Fort Myers, FL 33902-2549 or via e-mail to FTMERP_Compliance@dep.state.fl.us . All submittals shall include the project name and indicated permit number when referring to this project. Note: In the event of an emergency, the Permittee should contact the Department by calling (800)320-0519. During normal business hours, the permittee should call (239)344-5600. SPECIFIC CONDITIONS - PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION 2. Best management practices for erosion control shall be implemented prior to construction commencement and shall be maintained at all times during construction to prevent siltation and turbid discharges in excess of State water quality standards pursuant to Rule 62-302, F.A.C., the ambient turbidity levels of the surrounding Outstanding Florida Waters. Methods shall include, but are not limited to the use of staked hay bales, staked filter cloth, sodding, seeding, staged construction and the installation of turbidity screens around the immediate project site. SPECIFIC CONDITIONS – CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES 3. Storage or stockpiling of tools and materials (i.e., lumber, pilings, debris,) within wetlands, along the shoreline, within the littoral zone, or elsewhere within wetlands or other surface waters is prohibited. This includes floating of pilings in surface waters. All vegetative material and debris shall be removed to a self-contained upland disposal area with no stockpiling of debris within wetland areas. 4. All CCA-treated pilings associated with the permitted activity shall be wrapped with impermeable plastic or PVC sleeves with a minimum of 30 mil thickness. The sleeves shall be installed concurrently with the installation of the pilings, shall extend from at least 6 inches below the level of the substrate to at least 2 feet above the mean high water line. Pilings which have to be replaced during the life of the facility shall meet the requirements of this condition. SPECIFIC CONDITIONS LISTED SPECIES 5. This permit does not authorize the permittee to cause any adverse impact to or “take” of state listed species and other regulated species of fish and wildlife. Compliance with state laws regulating the take of fish and wildlife is the responsibility of the owner or applicant 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 573 Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) Permittee: Moody Permit Expiration: September 11, 2024 Permit No: 0373834-003 EI Page 5 of 14 associated with this project. Please refer to Chapter 68A-27 of the Florida Administrative Code for definitions of “take” and a list of fish and wildlife species. If listed species are observed onsite, FWC staff are available to provide decision support information or assist in obtaining the appropriate FWC permits. Most marine endangered and threatened species are statutorily protected and a “take” permit cannot be issued. Requests for further information or review can be sent to FWCConservationPlanningServices@MyFWC.com. SPECIFIC MANATEE PROTECTION CONDITIONS 6. All personnel associated with the project shall be instructed about the presence of manatees and manatee speed zones, and the need to avoid collisions with, and injury to manatees. The permittee shall advise all construction personnel that there are civil and criminal penalties for harming, harassing, or killing manatees which are protected under the Marine Mammal Protection Act, the Endangered Species Act, and the Florida Manatee Sanctuary Act. 7. All vessels asso ciated with the construction project shall operate at "Idle Speed/No Wake” at all times while in the immediate area and while in water where the draft of the vessel provides less than a four-foot clearance from the bottom. All vessels shall follow routes of deep water whenever possible. 8. Siltation or turbidity barriers shall be made of material in which manatees cannot become entangled, shall be properly secured, and shall be regularly monitored to avoid manatee entanglement or entrapment. Barriers shall not impede manatee movement. 9. All on-site project personnel are responsible for observing water -related activities for the presence of manatees. All in-water operations, including vessels, shall be shutdown if a manatee comes within 50 feet of the operatio n. Activities shall not resume until every manatee has moved beyond the 50-foot radius of the project operation, or until 30 minutes has elapsed wherein a manatee has not reappeared within 50 feet of the operation. Animals shall not be herded away or harassed into leaving. 10. Any collision with or injury to a manatee shall be reported immediately to the FWC Hotline at 1-888-404-FWCC. Collision and/or injury should also be reported to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service in Jacksonville (1-904-731-3336) for north Florida or Vero Beach (1-772-562-3909) for south Florida. 11. Temporary signs concerning manatees shall be posted prior to and during all in-water project activities. All signs are to be removed by the permittee upon completion of the project. Awareness signs that have already been approved for this use by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) must be used. One sign measuring at least 3 ft. by 4 ft. which reads Caution: Manatee Area must be posted. A second sign measuring at least 8 1/2" by 11" explaining the requirements for “Idle Speed/No Wake” and the shutdown of in-water operations must be posted in a location prominently visible 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 574 Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) Permittee: Moody Permit Expiration: September 11, 2024 Permit No: 0373834-003 EI Page 6 of 14 to all personnel engaged in water-related activities. Please see the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservat ion Commission website for information on how to obtain appropriate signs: http://www.myfwc.com/docs/WildlifeHabitats/Manatee_EducationalSign.pdf SPECIFIC CONDITIONS – OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES 12. No more than two boats are authorized to be moored at the dock. SPECIAL CONSENT CONDITIONS 1. The applicant agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the Board of Trustees and the State of Florida from all claims, actions, lawsuits and demands in any form arising out of the authorization to use sovereignty submerged lands or the applicant’s use and construction of structures on sovereignty submerged lands. This duty to indemnify and hold harmless will include any and all liabilities that are associated with the structure or activity including special assessments or taxes that are now or in the future assessed against t he structure or activity during the period of the authorization. 2. Failure by the Board of Trustees to enforce any violation of a provision of the authorization or waiver by the Board of Trustees of any provision of the authorization will not invalidate the provision not enforced or waived, nor will the failure to enforce or a waiver prevent the Board of Trustees from enforcing the unenforced or waived provision in the event of a violation of that provision. 3. Applicant binds itself and its successors and ass igns to abide by the provisions and conditions set forth in the authorization. If the applicant or its successors or assigns fails or refuses to comply with the provisions and conditions of the authorization, the authorization may be terminated by the Board of Trustees after written notice to the applicant or its successors or assigns. Upon receipt of such notice, the applicant or its successors or assigns will have thirty (30) days in which to correct the violations. Failure to correct the violations within this period will result in the automatic revocation of this authorization. 4. All costs incurred by the Board of Trustees in enforcing the terms and conditions of the authorization will be paid by the applicant. Any notice required by law will be made by c ertified mail at the address shown on page one of the authorization. The applicant will notify the Board of Trustees in writing of any change of address at least ten days before the change becomes effective. 5. This authorization does not allow any activity prohibited in a conservation easement or restrictive covenant that prohibits the activity. GENERAL CONDITIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL PERMITS The following general conditions are binding on all individual permits issued under chapter 62 - 330, F.A.C., except where the conditions are not applicable to the authorized activity, or where the conditions must be modified to accommodate project-specific conditions. 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 575 Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) Permittee: Moody Permit Expiration: September 11, 2024 Permit No: 0373834-003 EI Page 7 of 14 1. All activities shall be implemented following the plans, specifications and performance criteria approved by this permit. Any deviations must be authorized in a permit modification in accordance with Rule 62-330.315, F.A.C. Any deviations that are not so authorized may subject the permittee to enforcement action and revocation of the permit u nder Chapter 373, F.S. 2. A complete copy of this permit shall be kept at the work site of the permitted activity during the construction phase, and shall be available for review at the work site upon request by the Agency staff. The permittee shall require the contractor to review the complete permit prior to beginning construction. 3. Activities shall be conducted in a manner that does not cause or contribute to violations of state water quality standards. Performance-based erosion and sediment control best management practices shall be installed immediately prior to, and be maintained during and after construction as needed, to prevent adverse impacts to the water resources and adjacent lands. Such practices shall be in accordance with the State of Florida Erosion and Sediment Control Designer and Reviewer Manual (Florida Department of Environmental Protection and Florida Department of Transportation June 2007), and the Florida Stormwater Erosion and Sedimentation Control Inspector’s Manual (Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Nonpoint Source Management Section, Tallahassee, Florida, July 2008), which are both incorporated by reference in subparagraph 62-330.050(9)(b)5., F.A.C., unless a project -specific erosion and sediment control plan is approved or other water quality control measures are required as part of the permit. 4. At least 48 hours prior to beginning the authorized activities, the permittee shall submit to the Agency a fully executed Form 62-330.350(1), “Construction Commencement Notice,” [October 1, 2013], which is incorporated by reference in paragraph 62-330.350(1)(d), F.A.C., indicating the expected start and completion dates. A copy of this form may be obtained from the Agency, as described in subsection 62-330.010(5), F.A.C. If available, an Agency website that fulfills this notification requirement may be used in lieu of the form. 5. Unless the permit is transferred under Rule 62-330.340, F.A.C., or transferred to an operating entity under Rule 62-330.310, F.A.C., the permittee is liable to comply with the plans, terms and conditions of the permit for the life of the project or activity. 6. Within 30 days after completing construction of the entire project, or any independent portion of the project, the permittee shall provide the following to the Agency, as applicable: a. For an individual, private single-family residential dwelling unit, duplex, triplex, or quadruplex “Construction Completion and Inspection Certification for Activities Associated With a Private Single-Family Dwelling Unit ” [Form 62-330.310(3)]; or b. For all other activities “As-Built Certification and Request for Conversion to Operational Phase” [Form 62-330.310(1)]. c. If available, an Agency website that fulfills this certification requirement may be used in lieu of the form. 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 576 Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) Permittee: Moody Permit Expiration: September 11, 2024 Permit No: 0373834-003 EI Page 8 of 14 7. If the final operation and maintenance entity is a third party: a. Prior to sales of any lot or unit served by the activity and within one year of permit issuance, or within 30 days of as- built certification, whichever comes first, the permittee shall submit, as applicable, a copy of the operation and maintenance documents (see sections 12.3 thru 12.3.3 of Volume I) as filed with the Department of State, Division of Corporations and a copy of any easement, plat, or deed restriction needed to operate or maintain the project, as recorded with the Clerk of the Court in the County in which the activity is located. b. Within 30 days of submittal of the as- built certification, the permittee shall submit “Request for Transfer of Environmental Resource Permit to the Perpetual Operation Entity” [Form 62- 330.310(2)] to transfer the permit to the operation and maintenance entity, along with the documentation requested in the form. If available, an Agency website that fulfills this transfer requirement may be used in lieu of the form. 8. The permittee shall notify the Agency in writing of changes required by any other regulatory agency that require changes to the permitted activity, and any required modification of this permit must be obtained prior to implementing the changes. 9. This permit does not: a. Convey to the permittee any property rights or privileges, or any other rights or privileges other than those specified herein or in Chapter 62-330, F.A.C.; b. Convey to the permittee or create in the permittee any interest in real property; c. Relieve the permittee from the need to obtain and comply with any other required federal, state, and local authorization, law, rule, or ordinance; or d. Authorize any entrance upon or work on property that is not owned, held in easement, or controlled by the permittee. 10. Prior to conducting any activities on state-owned submerged lands or other lands of the state, title to which is vested in the Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund, the permittee must receive all necessary approvals and authorizations under Chapters 253 and 258, F.S. Written authorization that requires formal execution by the Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund shall not be considered received until it has been fully executed. 11. The permittee shall hold and save the Agency harmless from any and all damages, claims, or liabilities that may arise by reason of the construction, alteration, operation, maintenance, removal, abandonment or use of any project authorized by the permit. 12. The permittee shall notify the Agency in writing: a. Immediately if any previously submitted information is discovered to be inaccurate; and b. Within 30 days of any conveyance or division of ownership or control of the property or the system, other than conveyance via a long-term lease, and the new owner shall request transfer of the permit in accordance with Rule 62-330.340, F.A.C. This does not apply to the sale of lots or units in residential or commercial subdivisions or condominiums where the stormwater management system has been completed and converted to the operation phase. 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 577 Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) Permittee: Moody Permit Expiration: September 11, 2024 Permit No: 0373834-003 EI Page 9 of 14 13. Upon reasonable notice to the permittee, Agency staff with proper identification shall have permission to enter, inspect, sample and test the project or activities to ensure conformity with the plans and specifications authorized in the permit. 14. If any prehistoric or historic artifacts, such as pottery or ceramics, stone tools or metal implements, dugout canoes, or any other physical remains that could be associated with Native American cultures, or early colonial or American settlement are encountered at any time within the project site area, work involving subsurface disturbance in the immediate vicinity of s uch discoveries shall cease. The permittee or other designee shall contact the Florida Department of State, Division of Historical Resources, Compliance and Review Section, at (850) 245 -6333 or (800) 847-7278, as well as the appropriate permitting agency o ffice. Such subsurface work shall not resume without verbal or written authorization from the Division of Historical Resources. If unmarked human remains are encountered, all work shall stop immediately and notification shall be provided in accordance with Section 872.05, F.S. 15. Any delineation of the extent of a wetland or other surface water submitted as part of the permit application, including plans or other supporting documentation, shall not be considered binding unless a specific condition of this permit or a formal determination under Rule 62- 330.201, F.A.C., provides otherwise. 16. The permittee shall provide routine maintenance of all components of the stormwater management system to remove trapped sediments and debris. Removed materials shall be disposed of in a landfill or other uplands in a manner that does not require a permit under Chapter 62-330, F.A.C., or cause violations of state water quality standards. 17. This permit is issued based on the applicant’s submitted information that reas onably demonstrates that adverse water resource-related impacts will not be caused by the completed permit activity. If any adverse impacts result, the Agency will require the permittee to eliminate the cause, obtain any necessary permit modification, and take any necessary corrective actions to resolve the adverse impacts. 18. A Recorded Notice of Environmental Resource Permit may be recorded in the county public records in accordance with subsection 62-330.090(7), F.A.C. Such notice is not an encumbrance upon the property. 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 578 Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) Permittee: Moody Permit Expiration: September 11, 2024 Permit No: 0373834-003 EI Page 10 of 14 GENERAL CONDITIONS FOR SOVEREIGNTY SUBMERGED LANDS AUTHORIZATION Any use of sovereignty submerged lands is subject to the following general conditions are binding upon the applicant and are enforceable under Chapter 253, F.S. and Chapter 258, F.S. 1. Sovereignty submerged lands may be used only for the specified activ ity or use. Any unauthorized deviation from the specified activity or use and the conditions for undertaking that activity or use will constitute a violation. Violation of the authorization will result in suspension or revocation of the applicant’s use of the sovereignty submerged lands unless cured to the satisfaction of the Board of Trustees. 2. Authorization under Rule 18-21.005, F.A.C., conveys no title to sovereignty submerged lands or water column, nor does it constitute recognition or acknowledgment of any other person’s title to such land or water. 3. Authorizations under Rule 18-21.005, F.A.C., may be modified, suspended or revoked in accordance with its terms or the remedies provided in Sections 253.04, F.S. and Chapter 18-14, F.A.C. 4. Structures or activities will be constructed and used to avoid or minimize adverse impacts to resources. 5. Construction, use, or operation of the structure or activity will not adversely affect any species which is endangered, threatened or of special concern, as listed in Rules 68A-27.003, 68A- 27.004, and 68A-27.005, F.A.C. 6. Structures or activities will not unreasonably interfere with riparian rights. When a court of competent jurisdiction determines that riparian rights have been unlawfully affected, the st ructure or activity will be modified in accordance with the court’s decision. 7. Structures or activities will not create a navigational hazard. 8. Structures will be maintained in a functional condition and will be repaired or removed if they become dilapidated to such an extent that they are no longer functional. 9. Structures or activities will be constructed, operated, and maintained solely for water dependent purposes. 10. The applicant agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the Board of Tru stees and the State of Florida from all claims, actions, lawsuits and demands in any form arising out of the authorization to use sovereignty submerged lands or the applicant’s use and construction of structures on sovereignty submerged lands. This duty to indemnify and hold harmless will include any and all liabilities that are associated with the structure or activity including special assessments or taxes that are now or in the future assessed against the structure or activity during the period of the authorization. 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 579 Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) Permittee: Moody Permit Expiration: September 11, 2024 Permit No: 0373834-003 EI Page 11 of 14 11. Failure by the Board of Trustees to enforce any violation of a provision of the authorization or waiver by the Board of Trustees of any provision of the authorization will not invalidate the provision not enforced or waived, nor will the failure to enforce or a waiver prevent the Board of Trustees from enforcing the unenforced or waived provision in the event of a violation of that provision. 12. Applicant binds itself and its successors and assigns to abide by the provisions and conditions set forth in the authorization. If the applicant or its successors or assigns fails or refuses to comply with the provisions and conditions of the authorization, the authorization may be terminated by the Board of Trustees after written notice to the applicant or its successors or assigns. Upon receipt of such notice, the applicant or its successors or assigns will have thirty (30) days in which to correct the violations. Failure to correct the violations within this period will result in the automatic revocation of this authorization. 13. All costs incurred by the Board of Trustees in enforcing the terms and conditions of the authorization will be paid by the applicant. Any notice required by law will be made by certified mail at the address shown on page one of the authorization. The applicant will notify the Board of Trustees in writing of any change of address at least ten days before the change becomes effective. 14. This authorization does not allow any activity prohibited in a conservation easement or restrictive covenant that prohibits the activity. NOTICE OF RIGHTS This action is final and effective on the date filed with the Clerk of the Department unless a petition for an administrative hearing is timely filed under Sec tions 120.569 and 120.57, F.S., before the deadline for filing a petition. On the filing of a timely and sufficient petition, this action will not be final and effective until further order of the Department. Because the administrative hearing process is designed to formulate final agency action, the hearing process may result in a modification of the agency action or even denial of the application. Petition for Administrative Hearing A person whose substantial interests are affected by the Department’s action may petition for an administrative proceeding (hearing) under Sections 120.569 and 120.57, F.S. Pursuant to Rule 28 - 106.201, F.A.C., a petition for an administrative hearing must contain the following information: (a) The name and address of each agency affected and each agency’s file or identification number, if known; (b) The name, address, any email address, any facsimile number, and telephone number of the petitioner; the name, address, and telephone number of the petitioner’s representative, if any, which shall be the address for service purposes during the course of the proceeding; and an explanation of how the petitioner’s substantial interests are or will be affected by the agency determination; 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 580 Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) Permittee: Moody Permit Expiration: September 11, 2024 Permit No: 0373834-003 EI Page 12 of 14 (c) A statement of when and how the petitioner received notice of the agency decision; (d) A statement of all disputed issues of material fact. If there are none, the petition must so indicate; (e) A concise statement of the ultimate facts alleged, including the specific facts that the petitioner cont ends warrant reversal or modification of the agency’s proposed action; (f) A statement of the specific rules or statutes that the petitioner contends require reversal or modification of the agency’s proposed action, including an explanation of how the alleged facts relate to the specific rules or statutes; and (g) A statement of the relief sought by the petitioner, stating precisely the action that the petitioner wishes the agency to take with respect to the agency’s proposed action. The petition must be filed (received by the Clerk) in the Office of General Counsel of the Department at 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard, Mail Station 35, Tallahassee, Florida 32399 - 3000. Also, a copy of the petition shall be mailed to the applicant at the address indicated above at the time of filing. Time Period for Filing a Petition In accordance with Rule 62-110.106(3), F.A.C., petitions for an administrative hearing by the applicant must be filed within 14 days of receipt of this written notice. Petitions filed by any persons other than the applicant, and other than those entitled to written notice under Section 120.60(3), F.S., must be filed within 14 days of publication of the notice or within 14 days of receipt of the written notice, whichever occurs first. Under Section 120.60(3), F.S., however, any person who has asked the Department for notice of agency action may file a petition within 14 days of receipt of such notice, regardless of the date of publication. The failure to file a petition within the appropriate time period shall constitute a waiver of that person's right to request an administrative determination (hearing) under Sections 120.569 and 120.57, F.S., or to intervene in this proceeding and partic ipate as a party to it. Any subsequent intervention (in a proceeding initiated by another party) will be only at the discretion of the presiding officer upon the filing of a motion in compliance with Rule 28-106.205, F.A.C. Extension of Time Under Rule 62-110.106(4), F.A.C., a person whose substantial interests are affected by the Department’s action may also request an extension of time to file a petition for an administrative hearing. The Department may, for good cause shown, grant the request for an ext ension of time. Requests for extension of time must be filed with the Office of General Counsel of the Department at 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard, Mail Station 35, Tallahassee, Florida 32399 -3000, before the applicable deadline for filing a petition for an administrative hearing. A timely request for extension of time shall toll the running of the time period for filing a petition until the request is acted upon. Mediation Mediation is not available in this proceeding. FLAWAC Review 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 581 Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) Permittee: Moody Permit Expiration: September 11, 2024 Permit No: 0373834-003 EI Page 13 of 14 The applicant, or any party within the meaning of Section 373.114(1)(a) or 373.4275, F.S., may also seek appellate review of this order before the Land and Water Adjudicatory Commission under Section 373.114(1) or 373.4275, F.S. Requests for review before the Land and Water Ad judicatory Commission must be filed with the Secretary of the Commission and served on the Department within 20 days from the date when this order is filed with the Clerk of the Department. Judicial Review Once this decision becomes final, any party to this action has the right to seek judicial review pursuant to Section 120.68, F.S., by filing a Notice of Appeal pursuant to Rules 9.110 and 9.190, Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, with the Clerk of the Department in the Office of General Counsel, 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard, M.S. 35, Tallahassee, Florida 32399 -3000; and by filing a copy of the Notice of Appeal accompanied by the applicable filing fees with the appropriate District Court of Appeal. The Notice of Appeal must be filed within 30 days fro m the date this action is filed with the Clerk of the Department. Executed in Orlando, Florida. STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION __________________________________ Jon M. Iglehart District Director South District Office Attachments: 4 project drawing(s) ‘Post Issuance’ forms: https://floridadep.gov/water/submerged-lands-environmental- resources-coordination/content/forms-environmental-resource 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 582 Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) Permittee: Moody Permit Expiration: September 11, 2024 Permit No: 0373834-003 EI Page 14 of 14 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned duly designated deputy clerk hereby certifies that this document and all attachments, including all copies, were sent to the addressee and to the following listed persons: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Fort Myers Office, fdep.other@usace.army.mil Collier County Property Appraiser, dstaruch@collierappraiser.com FILING AND ACKNOWLEDGMENT FILED, on this date, pursuant to Section 120.52(7), F.S., with the designated Department clerk, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged. September 11, 2019 Clerk Date 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 583 Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) STATE OF FLORIDACOUNTY AERIAL VICINITY MAPSTATE OF FLORIDACOUNTY AERIAL VICINITY MAPNOTES:<> THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SUBJECTPROPERTYSUBJECTPROPERTY<> LATITUDE:N 26.326931<> LONGITUDE:W 81.831553SITE ADDRESS:<> 267 3RD ST W, LOT #8BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@turrell-associates.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\19019.00 moody - 267 3rd st\CAD\PERMIT-STATE\19019-MOODY-STATE.dwg LOCATION 7/17/2019THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:JRRMJ06-14-1919019.00-525MOODY - 267 3RD STLOCATION48-------------------01 OF 04COLLIER COUNTYCOLLIER COUNTY)7.(1(/':+%1)7.(1(/':+%18588288641MARCOISLANDEVERGLADESCITY9329846NAPLES90908399483783784129292983983992887846951862I-758486431856850846890896NESWKEY WESTTAMPAFT.MYERSMIAMINAPLESSUBJECTPROPERTY9.A.4.dPacket Pg. 584Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) x - 9 .1x - 6 . 9 - 6 . 7 Xx - 4 . 9 - 3 .6 xx - 3 . 3 x - 8 . 9 - 5 . 9 x x - 9 .0x - 9 . 9 x - 8 . 3 x - 9 . 5 x - 8 . 9 x - 8 . 3 x - 8 . 4 x - 8 . 1x - 7 . 9 x - 4 . 2 x - 2 . 8 x - 4 . 5x - 1 . 9 x - 2 . 1 x - 2 .1x - 2 . 7 NESW081632SCALE IN FEETSITE ADDRESS:,267 3RD ST W, LOT #8BONITA SPRINGSFL34134Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@turrell-associates.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\19019.00 moody - 267 3rd st\CAD\PERMIT-STATE\19019-MOODY-STATE.dwg EXISTING AERIAL 7/17/2019THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:JRRMJ06-14-1919019.00-525MOODY - 267 3RD STEXISTING AERIAL48-------------------02 OF 04·SURVEY COURTESY OF:··SURVEY DATED:·THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY ANDARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.·ALL DATUM SHOWN HEREON IS REFERENCED TO MLW·APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPX LF):·EXISTING OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·WIDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW (APPX):·TIDAL DATUM:··MHW (NAVD)=··MLW (NAVD)=NOTES:"DAGOSTINO & WOOD, INC."01-08-19-1.66'0.32'34.0703503RD ST WMANGROVES HAVE BEEN REMOVEDPER PERMIT # 0373834-001MLWL = -0.5'(NAVD 1988)MHWL = -0.0'(NAVD 1988)EXISTINGTOP OF BANKPROPERTYLINERIPARIAN LINERIPARIAN LINE9.A.4.dPacket Pg. 585Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) p:\19019.00 moody - 267 3rd st\CAD\PERMIT-STATE\19019-MOODY-STATE.dwg 7/17/2019NESW051020SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@turrell-associates.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\19019.00 moody - 267 3rd st\CAD\PERMIT-STATE\19019-MOODY-STATE.dwg PROPOSED AERIAL 7/17/2019THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:JRRMJ06-14-1919019.00-525MOODY - 267 3RD STPROPOSED AERIAL WITH DIMIENSIONS48-------------------03 OF 04·SURVEY COURTESY OF:··SURVEY DATED:·THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY ANDARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.·ALL DATUM SHOWN HEREON IS REFERENCED TO MLW·APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPX LF):·EXISTING OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·WIDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW (APPX):·TIDAL DATUM:··MHW (NAVD)=··MLW (NAVD)=NOTES:·PROPOSED OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·TOTAL OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·TOTAL PROTRUSION FROM MHWL:"DAGOSTINO & WOOD, INC."01-08-19-1.66'0.32'34.0703501400140047'PROPOSED 15'X15' LIFTRIPARIAN LINERIPARIAN LINEPROPOSED16'X16' LIFTPROPOSEDFIXED DOCK54'5'47'38'38'AA101PROPOSEDCANOPYPROPOSEDCANOPY16'15'9.A.4.dPacket Pg. 586Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) x - 4 . 9 - 5.9 xx - 4 . 5 0248SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@turrell-associates.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\19019.00 moody - 267 3rd st\CAD\PERMIT-STATE\19019-MOODY-STATE.dwg CROSS SECTION 7/17/2019THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:JRRMJ06-14-1919019.00-525MOODY - 267 3RD STAA CROSS SECTION48-------------------04 OF 0416' BOAT LIFT15' BOAT LIFT5'MHWL = +0.32' NAVDMLWL = -1.66' NAVDPROPOSED DOCKPROPOSEDCANOPIESALL PILES TO BE WRAPPEDWITH PVC 1FT ABOVE MHWLAND 1FT BELOW SUBSTRATE9.A.4.dPacket Pg. 587Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF Environmental Protection South District PO Box 2549 Fort Myers FL 33902-2549 SouthDistrict@FloridaDEP.gov Ron DeSantis Governor Jeanette Nuñez Lt. Governor Noah Valenstein Secretary Permittee/Authorized Entity: William Moody 1230 Clover Ln. Matthews, NC 28104 Mangrove Removal Authorized Agent: Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. ℅ Jeff Rogers 3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104 jeff@THAnaples.com Mangrove Permit State-owned Submerged Lands Authorization – Not Applicable U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Authorization – Not Applicable Permit No.: 0373834-001 MA Permit Issuance Date: May 24, 2019 Permit Construction Phase Expiration Date: May 24, 2024 www.dep.state.fl.us 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 588 Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) Permittee: Moody Permit Expiration: May 24, 2024 Permit No: 0373834-001 MA Page 2 of 7   Mangrove Trimming Permit Permittee: Moody Permit No: 0373834-001 MA AUTHORIZATIONS Mangrove Trimming Project Description The permittee is authorized to remove 415 square feet (0.01 acres) of mangroves adjacent to Little Hickory Bay in unnamed wetlands, Class II Outstanding Florida Waters, Unclassified for shellfish harvesting at 267 3rd street W., Naples, FL. 34134 (Parcel ID 56000960000), Section 05, Township 48 South, Range 25 East. Authorized activities are depicted on the attached exhibits. To offset unavoidable impacts that will occur from these authorized activities, the permittee shall mitigate by purchasing 0.02 Forested Saltwater credits from the Little Pine Island Mitigation Bank. The project described above may be conducted only in accordance with the terms, conditions and attachments contained in this permit. The issuance of this permit does not infer, nor guarantee, nor imply that future permits or modifications will be granted by the Department. State-owned Submerged Lands Authorization As staff to the Board of Trustees, the Department has reviewed the activity described below, and has determined the activity is exempt from the requirements of Chapter 253, Florida Statutes (F.S.). Federal Authorization A copy of this permit has been sent to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). The USACE may require a separate permit. Failure to obtain any required federal permits prior to construction could subject you to enforcement action by that agency. Water Quality Certification This permit constitutes certification of compliance with state water quality standards under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1341. Other Authorizations You are advised that authorizations or permits for this project may be required by other federal, state or local entities including but not limited to local governments and homeowner’s associations. This permit does not relieve you from the requirements to obtain all other required permits or authorizations. In addition, you are advised that your project may require additional authorizations or permits from the municipality/county in which the project is located. Please be sure to contact the local county building and environmental department to obtain these required authorizations. 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 589 Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962)   Permittee: Moody Permit Expiration: May 24, 2024 Permit No: 0373834-001 MA Page 3 of 7 PROJECT LOCATION The activities authorized by this Permit are located at Little Hickory Bay in unnamed wetlands, Class II Outstanding Florida Waters, Unclassified for shellfish harvesting at 267 3rd street W., Naples, FL. 34134 (Parcel ID 56000960000), Section 05, Township 48 South, Range 25 East. PERMIT The activities described herein must be conducted in accordance with:  The Specific Conditions  The limits, conditions and locations of work shown in the attached drawings  The term limits of this authorization You are advised to read and understand these conditions and drawings prior to commencing the authorized activities, and to ensure the work is conducted in conformance with all the terms, conditions, and drawings. If you are utilizing a contractor, the contractor also should read and understand these conditions and drawings prior to commencing the authorized activities. Failure to comply with these conditions, including any mitigation requirements, shall constitute grounds for revocation of the Permit and appropriate enforcement action by the Department. Operation of the facility is not authorized except when determined to be in conformance with all applicable rules and this permit, as specifically described above. SPECIFIC CONDITIONS - PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION 1. Submittals required herein shall be directed to: Department of Environmental Protection Environmental Resource Program, South District, P.O. Box 2549, Fort Myers, Florida 33902 (hereafter referred to as "the Department") or sent via email to FTMERP_Compliance@dep.state.fl.us . Submittals include, but are not limited to, record drawings, progress reports, mitigation monitoring reports and water quality monitoring reports. Submittals shall include the permittee's name and permit number. 2. If the approved permit, drawings and the Specific Conditions contradict each other, then the Specific Conditions shall prevail. 3. The work authorized by this permit shall not be conducted on any property, other than that owned by the permittee, without the prior written approval of that property owner. 4. In the event the permittee files for bankruptcy prior to completion of work permitted and required by this permit, the permittee must notify the Department within 30 days of filing. The notification shall identify the bankruptcy court and case number and shall include a copy of the bankruptcy petition. 5. The permittee shall notify the Department in writing within 14 days of change in agents designated in the approved permit application. 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 590 Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962)   Permittee: Moody Permit Expiration: May 24, 2024 Permit No: 0373834-001 MA Page 4 of 7 SPECIFIC CONDITIONS - PRE- ALTERATION 6. There shall be no storage or stockpiling of tools, materials (i.e., lumber, pilings, debris.) within wetlands, along the shoreline or elsewhere within waters of the state unless specifically approved in the permit. All material and vegetative debris shall be removed to a self-contained upland disposal area with no stockpiling or debris within wetland areas. SPECIFIC CONDITIONS - ALTERATION 7. Mangroves shall be cut using hand held equipment in a manner that will minimize impacts to the existing wetland vegetation and will not cause rutting of the soils. Heavy equipment and vehicles shall not operate within Department jurisdictional wetlands or surface waters. 8. The use of herbicides or other chemicals for the purposes of removing leaves from a mangrove is strictly prohibited. 9. This permit does not authorize the disturbance of the substrate in which the mangroves are rooted. SPECIFIC CONDITIONS – MITIGATION AND PUBLIC INTEREST 10. Prior to commencement of any alteration, the permittee shall mitigate for the 0.01 acres of impacts by the purchase of 0.02 credits of forested saltwater wetlands from Little Pine Island Mitigation Bank, phone number (239) 530-8044, 13041-2 McGregor Boulevard, Fort Myers, Florida 33919. Within 10 days of purchase, the permittee shall provide the Department with documentation that 0.02 credits have been deducted from the credit ledger of the bank NOTICE OF RIGHTS This action is final and effective on the date filed with the Clerk of the Department unless a petition for an administrative hearing is timely filed under Sections 120.569 and 120.57, F.S., before the deadline for filing a petition. On the filing of a timely and sufficient petition, this action will not be final and effective until further order of the Department. Because the administrative hearing process is designed to formulate final agency action, the filing of a petition means that the Department’s final action may be different from the position taken by it in this notice. Petition for Administrative Hearing A person whose substantial interests are affected by the Department’s action may petition for an administrative proceeding (hearing) under Sections 120.569 and 120.57, F.S. Pursuant to Rule 28-106.201, F.A.C., a petition for an administrative hearing must contain the following information: (a) The name and address of each agency affected and each agency's file or identification number, if known; 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 591 Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962)   Permittee: Moody Permit Expiration: May 24, 2024 Permit No: 0373834-001 MA Page 5 of 7 (b) The name, address, and telephone number of the petitioner; the name, address, and telephone number of the petitioner's representative, if any, which shall be the address for service purposes during the course of the proceeding; and an explanation of how the petitioner's substantial interests are or will be affected by the agency determination; (c) A statement of when and how the petitioner received notice of the agency decision; (d) A statement of all disputed issues of material fact. If there are none, the petition must so indicate; (e) A concise statement of the ultimate facts alleged, including the specific facts that the petitioner contends warrant reversal or modification of the agency's proposed action; and (f) A statement of the specific rules or statutes that the petitioner contends require reversal or modification of the agency's proposed action, including an explanation of how the alleged facts relate to the specific rules or statutes; and (g) A statement of the relief sought by the petitioner, stating precisely the action that the petitioner wishes the agency to take with respect to the agency's proposed action. The petition must be filed (received by the Clerk) in the Office of General Counsel of the Department at 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard, Mail Station 35, Tallahassee, Florida 32399- 3000. Also, a copy of the petition shall be mailed to the permittee at the address indicated above at the time of filing. Time Period for Filing a Petition In accordance with Rule 62-110.106(3), F.A.C., petitions for an administrative hearing by the permittee must be filed with 21 days of receipt of this written notice. Petitions filed by any persons other than the permittee, and other than those entitled to written notice under Section 120.60(3), F.S., must be filed within 21 days of publication of the notice or within 21 days of receipt of the written notice, whichever occurs first. Under Section 120.60(3), F.S., however, any person who has asked the Department for notice of agency action may file a petition with 21 days of receipt of such notice, regardless of the date of publication. The failure to file a petition within the appropriate time period shall constitute a waiver of that person’s right to request an administrative determination (hearing) under Sections 120.569 and 120.57, F.S., or to intervene in this proceeding and participate as a party to it. Any subsequent intervention (in a proceeding initiated by another party) will be only at the discretion of the presiding officer upon the filing of a motion in compliance with Rule 28-106.205, F.A.C. Extension of Time Under Rule 62-110.106(4), F.A.C., a person whose substantial interests are affected by the Department’s action may also request an extension of time to file a petition for an administrative hearing. The Department may, for good cause shown, grant the request for an extension of time. Requests for extension of must be filed with the Office of General Counsel of the Department at 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard, Mail Station 35, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3000, before the applicable deadline for filing a petition for an administrative hearing. A timely request for extension of time shall toll the running of the time period for filing a petition until the request is acted upon. Mediation 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 592 Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962)   Permittee: Moody Permit Expiration: May 24, 2024 Permit No: 0373834-001 MA Page 6 of 7 Mediation is not available in this proceeding. FLAWAC Review The permittee, or any party within the meaning of Section 373.114(1)(a) or 373.4275, F.S., may also seek appellate review of this order before the Land and Water Adjudicatory Commission under Section 373.114(1) or 373.4275, F.S. Requests for review before the Land and Water Adjudicatory Commission must be filed with the Secretary of the Commission and served on the Department within 20 days from the date when the order is filed with the Clerk of the Department. Judicial Review Any party to this action has the right to seek judicial review pursuant to section 120.68, F.S., by filing a Notice of Appeal pursuant to Rules 9.110 and 9.190, Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, with the Clerk of the Department in the Office of General Counsel, 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard, M.S. 35, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3000; and by filing a copy of the Notice of Appeal accompanied by the applicable filing fees with the appropriate District Court of Appeal. The Notice of Appeal must be filed with 30 days from the date this action is filed with the Clerk of the Department. Executed in Lee County, Florida. STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Jon M. Iglehart District Director South District JMI/jsg Attachments: Project Drawings and Design Specs., 3 pages 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 593 Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962)   Permittee: Moody Permit Expiration: May 24, 2024 Permit No: 0373834-001 MA Page 7 of 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned hereby certifies that this permit, including all copies, was mailed before the close of business on May 24, 2019, to the above listed persons. FILING AND ACKNOWLEDGMENT FILED, on this date, under 120.52(7) of the Florida Statutes, with the designated Department Clerk, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged. May 24, 2019 ____________________________________________ Clerk Date 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 594 Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) STATE OF FLORIDACOUNTY AERIAL VICINITY MAPSTATE OF FLORIDACOUNTY AERIAL VICINITY MAPNOTES:<> THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SUBJECTPROPERTYSUBJECTPROPERTY<> LATITUDE:N 26.326931<> LONGITUDE:W 81.831553SITE ADDRESS:<> 267 3RD ST WBONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@turrell-associates.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\19019.00 moody - 267 3rd st\CAD\PERMIT-STATE\19019-MANGROVE_REMOVAL.dwg LOCATION 2/7/2019THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:JRRMJ02-07-1919019.00-525MOODY - 267 3RD STLOCATION MAP48-------------------01 OF 03COLLIER COUNTYCOLLIER COUNTY)7.(1(/':+%1)7.(1(/':+%18588288641MARCOISLANDEVERGLADESCITY9329846NAPLES90908399483783784129292983983992887846951862I-758486431856850846890896NESWKEY WESTTAMPAFT.MYERSMIAMINAPLESSUBJECTPROPERTY9.A.4.dPacket Pg. 595Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) NESW0102040SCALE IN FEETSITE ADDRESS:,267 3RD ST WBONITA SPRINGSFL34134Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@turrell-associates.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\19019.00 moody - 267 3rd st\CAD\PERMIT-STATE\19019-MANGROVE_REMOVAL.dwg EX AERIAL 2/7/2019THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:JRRMJ02-07-1919019.00-525MOODY - 267 3RD STEXISTING AERIAL48-------------------02 OF 03·SURVEY COURTESY OF:··SURVEY DATED:·THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY ANDARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.·ALL DATUM SHOWN HEREON IS REFERENCED TO MLW·APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPX LF):·EXISTING OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·WIDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW (APPX):·TIDAL DATUM:··MHW (NAVD)=··MLW (NAVD)=NOTES:"DAGOSTINO & WOOD, INC."01-08-19-0.5'+0.0'34.0703503RD ST W EXISTINGVEGETATION LINEMLWL = -0.5'(NAVD 1988)MHWL = -0.0'(NAVD 1988)EXISTINGTOP OF BANKPROPERTYLINE9.A.4.dPacket Pg. 596Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) NESW051020SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@turrell-associates.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\19019.00 moody - 267 3rd st\CAD\PERMIT-STATE\19019-MANGROVE_REMOVAL.dwg IMPACTS 2/7/2019THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:JRRMJ02-07-1919019.00-525MOODY - 267 3RD STIMPACTS MAP48-------------------03 OF 03·SURVEY COURTESY OF:··SURVEY DATED:NOTES:·THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY ANDARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE."DAGOSTINO & WOOD, INC."01-08-19MANGROVE REMOVAL (SQ FT)4153RD ST W EXISTINGVEGETATION LINEMLWL = -0.5'(NAVD 1988)MHWL = -0.0'(NAVD 1988)EXISTINGTOP OF BANKMANGROVESTO BEREMOVED9.A.4.dPacket Pg. 597Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) Regulatory Division West Permits Branch Fort Myers Permits Section SAJ-2019-03011(GP-EPL) Braun Moody 267 3rd Street West Naples, FL 34134 Dear Mr. Moody: Your application for a Department of the Army permit received on 14 August 2019 has been assigned number SAJ-2019-03011. A review of the information and drawings provided shows the proposed work is the installation of 5’ x 54’ wooden dock with two 15’x15’ covered boatlifts. The project will result in the installation of twenty-six wooden pilings below the Mean High Water Line (MHWL) and approximately 493 square feet of over water structure. The project would affect waters of the United States associated with Little Hickory Bay and is located in Section 5, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, at 267 3rd Street West, Bonita Springs, Collier County, Florida. Your project, as depicted on the enclosed drawings (Attachment I), is authorized by Regional General Permit (GP) SAJ-20 (Attachment II). This authorization is valid until March 27, 2023. Please access the Corps' Jacksonville District Regulatory Division Internet page to view the special and general conditions for SAJ-20, which apply specifically to this authorization. The Internet URL address is: http://www.saj.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory.aspx Please be aware this Internet address is case sensitive; and, you will need to enter it exactly as it appears above. Once there you will need to click on “Source Book”; and, then click on “General Permits”. Then you will need to click on the specific SAJ permit noted above. You must comply with all of the special and general conditions of the permit; and, any project-specific conditions noted below, or you may be subject to enforcement action. The following project-specific conditions are included with this authorization: The following special conditions are to ensure compliance with the federal permit and to minimize impacts to the aquatic environment. 1. Reporting Address: The Permittee shall submit all reports, notifications, documentation and correspondence required by the general and special conditions of this permit to the following address: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY JACKSONVILLE DISTRICT CORPS OF ENGINEERS 1520 Royal Palm Square Blvd, Suite 310 Fort Myers, FL 33919 October 3, 2019 REPLY TO ATTENTION OF 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 598 Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) -2- a. For standard mail: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Regulatory Division, Spe cial Projects and Enforcement Branch, 9900 SW 107th Ave, Suite 203, Miami, FL 33176 b. For electronic mail CESAJ-ComplyDocs@usace.army.mil (not to exceed 10 MB). The Permittee shall reference this permit number, SAJ-2019-03011 (GP-EPL), on all submittals. 2. Self-Certification: Within 60 days of completion of the work authorized by this permit, the Permittee shall complete the attached “Self -Certification Statement of Compliance” form (Attachment III) and submit it to the Corps. In the event that the completed work deviates in any manner from the authorized work, the Permittee shall describe the deviations between the work authorized by this permit and the work as constructed on the “Self-Certification Statement of Compliance” form. The description of any deviations on the “Self-Certification Statement of Compliance” form does not constitute approval of any deviations by the Corps. 3. Commencement Notification: Within 10 days from the date of initiating the work authorized by this permit/Within 10 days from the date of initiating the work authorized by this permit for each phase of the authorized project, the Permittee shall provide a written notification of the date of commencement of authorized work to the Corps. 4. Assurance of Navigation and Maintenance: The Permittee understands and agrees that, if future operations by the United States require the removal, relocation, or other alteration, of the structures or work herein authorized, or if in the opinion of the Secretary of the Army or his authorized representative, said structure or work shall cause unreasonable obstruction to the free navigation of the navigable waters, the Permittee will be required, upon due notice from the Corps of Engineers, to remove, relocate, or alter the structural work or obstructions caused thereby, without expense to the United States. No claim shall be made against the United States on account of any such removal or alteration. 5. Project Design Criteria (PDCs) for In-Water Activities: The Permittee shall comply with National Marine Fisheries Service’s “PDCs for In-Water Activities” dated November 20, 2017 (Attachment IV). 6. Sea turtle and smalltooth sawfish conditions: The Permittee shall comply with National Marine Fisheries Service's “Sea Turtle and Smalltooth Sawfish Construction Conditions,” dated March 23, 2006 (Attachment V). 7. Manatee Conditions: The Permittee shall abide by the enclosed standard 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 599 Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) -3- construction conditions designed to protect the endangered West Indian manatee, 2011 (Attachment VI). 8. Posting of Permit: The Permittee shall have available and maintain for review a copy of this permit and approved plans at the construction site. 9. Daylight Hours: All activities must be completed during daylight hours. 10. PDCs for In-Water Noise from Pile and Sheet Pile Installation: The maximum number of piles installed per day is limited to no more than 10 piles per day. 11. Agency Changes/Approvals: Should any other agency require and/or approve changes to the work authorized or obligated by this permit, the Permittee is advised a modification to this permit instrument is required prior to initiation of those changes. It is the Permittee’s responsibility to request a modification of this permit from the Fort Myers Permits Section. The Corps reserves the right to fully evaluate, amend, and approve or deny the request for modification of this permit. 12. Historic Properties: a. No structure or work shall adversely affect impact or disturb properties listed in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) or those eligible for inclusion in the NRHP. b. If during the ground disturbing activities and construction work within the permit area, there are archaeological/cultural materials encountered which were not the subject of a previous cultural resources assessment survey (and which shall include, but not be limited to: pottery, modified shell, flora, fauna, human remains, ceramics, stone tools or metal implements, dugout canoes, evidence of structures or any other physical remains that could be associated with Native American cultures or early colonial or American settlement), the Permittee shall immediately stop all work and ground -disturbing activities within a 100-meter diameter of the discovery and notify the Corps within the same business day (8 hours). The Corps shall then notify the Florida State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) and the appropriate Tribal Historic Preservation Officer(s) (THPO(s)) to assess the significance of the discovery and devise appropriate actions. c. Additional cultural resources assessments may be required of the permit area in the case of unanticipated discoveries as referenced in accordance with the above Special Condition ; and if deemed necessary by the SHPO, THPO(s), or Corps, in accordance with 36 CFR 800 or 33 CFR 325, Appendix C (5). Based, on the circumstances of the 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 600 Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) -4- discovery, equity to all parties, and considerations of the public interest, the Corps may modify, suspend or revoke the permit in accordance with 33 CFR Part 325.7. Such activity shall not resume on non-federal lands without written authorization from the SHPO for finds under his or her jurisdiction, and from the Corps. d. In the unlikely event that unmarked human remains are identified on non-federal lands, they will be treated in accordance with Section 872.05 Florida Statutes. All work and ground disturbing activities within a 100-meter diameter of the unmarked human remains shall immediately cease and the Permittee shall immediately notify the medical examiner, Corps, and State Archeologist within the same business day (8 -hours). The Corps shall then notify the appropriate SHPO and THPO(s). Based, on the circumstances of the discovery, equity to all parties, and considerations of the public interest, the Corps may modify, suspend or revoke the permit in accordance with 33 CFR Part 325.7. Such activity shall not resume without written authorization from the State Archeologist and from the Corps. This authorization does not obviate the necessity to obtain any other Federal, State, or local permits, which may be required. Prior to the initiation of any construction, projects qualifying for this RGP permit must qualify for an exemption under section 403.813(1), F.S. or 373.406, F.S., or otherwise be authorized by the applicable permit required under Part IV of Chapter 373, F.S., by the Department of Environmental Protection, a water management district under section 373.069, F.S., or a local government with delegated authority under section 373.441, F.S., and receive Water Quality Certification (WQC) and applicable Coastal Zone Consistency Concurrence (CZCC) or waiver thereto, as well as any authorizations required for the use of state - owned submerged lands under Chapter 253, F.S., and, as applicable, Chapter 258, F.S. You should check State-permitting requirements with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection or the appropriate water management district. This authorization does not include conditions that would prevent the ‘take’ of a state - listed fish or wildlife species. These species are protected under sec. 379.411, Florida Statutes, and listed under Rule 68A-27, Florida Administrative Code. With regard to fish and wildlife species designated as species of special concern or threatened by the State of Florida, you are responsible for coordinating directly with the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC). You can visit the FWC license and permitting webpage (http://www.myfwc.com/license/wildlife/) for more information, including a list of those fish and wildlife species designated as species of special concern or threatened. The Florida Natural Areas Inventory (http://www.fnai.org/) also maintains updated lists, by county, of documented occurrences of those species. 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 601 Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) -5- This authorization does not give absolute Federal authority to perform the work as specified on your application. The proposed work may be subject to local buildin g restrictions mandated by the National Flood Insurance Program. You should contact your local office that issues building permits to determine if your site is located in a flood-prone area, and if you must comply with the local building requirements mand ated by the National Flood Insurance Program. If you are unable to access the internet or require a hardcopy of any of the conditions, limitations, or expiration date for the above referenced RGP, please contact Eric Larrat by telephone at 239-334-1975. Thank you for your cooperation with our permit program. The Corps’ Jacksonville District Regulatory Division is committed to improving service to our customers. We strive to perform our duty in a friendly and timely manner while working to pres erve our environment. We invite you to complete our automated Customer Service Survey at http://corpsmapu.usace.army.mil/cm_apex/f?p=regulatory_survey. Please be aware this Internet address is case sensitive; and, you will need to enter it exactly as it appears above. Your input is appreciated – favorable or otherwise. Sincerely, Eric P. Larrat Project Manager Enclosures Attachment I: Project Drawings Attachment II: SAJ-20 Attachment III: Self-Certification of Compliance Attachment IV: Project Design Criteria (PDCs) for In-Water Activities Attachment V: Smalltooth Sawfish and Sea Turtle Conditions Attachment VI: Manatee In-Water Work Conditions 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 602 Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) GENERAL CONDITIONS 33 CFR PART 320-330 1. The time limit for completing the work authorized ends on the dates identified in the letter. 2. You must maintain the activity authorized by this permit in good condition and in conformance with the terms and conditions of this permit. You are not relieved of this requirement if you abandon the permitted activity, although you may make a good faith transfer to a third party in compliance with General Condition 4 below. Should you wish to cease to maintain the authorized activity or should you desire to abandon it without a good faith transfer, you must obtain a modification of this permit from this office, which may require restoration of the area. 3. If you discover any previously unknown historic or archeological remains while accomplishing the activity authorized by this permit, you must immediately notify this office of what you have found. We will initiate the Fed eral and state coordination required to determine if the remains warrant a recovery effort or if the site is eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. 4. If you sell the property associated with this permit you must obtain the sig nature of the new owner in the space provided and forward a copy of the permit to this office to validate the transfer of this authorization. 5. If a conditioned water quality certification has been issued for your project, you must comply with the conditions specified in the certification as special conditions to this permit. For your convenience, a copy of the certification is attached if it contains such conditions. 6. You must allow a representative from this office to inspect the authorized activity at any time deemed necessary to ensure that it is being or has been accomplished in accordance with the terms and conditions of your permit. 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 603 Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) ATTACHMENT I 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 604 Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) STATE OF FLORIDACOUNTY AERIAL VICINITY MAPSTATE OF FLORIDACOUNTY AERIAL VICINITY MAPNOTES:<> THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SUBJECTPROPERTYSUBJECTPROPERTY<> LATITUDE:N 26.326931<> LONGITUDE:W 81.831553SITE ADDRESS:<> 267 3RD ST W, LOT #8BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@turrell-associates.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\19019.00 moody - 267 3rd st\CAD\PERMIT-STATE\19019-MOODY-STATE.dwg LOCATION 7/9/2019THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:JRRMJ06-14-1919019.00-525MOODY - 267 3RD STLOCATION48-------------------01 OF 04COLLIER COUNTYCOLLIER COUNTY)7.(1(/':+%1)7.(1(/':+%18588288641MARCOISLANDEVERGLADESCITY9329846NAPLES90908399483783784129292983983992887846951862I-758486431856850846890896NESWKEY WESTTAMPAFT.MYERSMIAMINAPLESSUBJECTPROPERTY9.A.4.dPacket Pg. 605Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) x - 9 .1x - 6 . 9 - 6 . 7 Xx - 4 . 9 - 3 .6 xx - 3 . 3 x - 8 . 9 - 5 . 9 x x - 9 .0x - 9 . 9 x - 8 . 3 x - 9 . 5 x - 8 . 9 x - 8 . 3 x - 8 . 4 x - 8 . 1x - 7 . 9 x - 4 . 2 x - 2 . 8 x - 4 . 5x - 1 . 9 x - 2 . 1 x - 2 .1x - 2 . 7 NESW081632SCALE IN FEETSITE ADDRESS:,267 3RD ST W, LOT #8BONITA SPRINGSFL34134Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@turrell-associates.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\19019.00 moody - 267 3rd st\CAD\PERMIT-STATE\19019-MOODY-STATE.dwg EXISTING AERIAL 7/9/2019THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:JRRMJ06-14-1919019.00-525MOODY - 267 3RD STEXISTING AERIAL48-------------------02 OF 04·SURVEY COURTESY OF:··SURVEY DATED:·THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY ANDARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.·ALL DATUM SHOWN HEREON IS REFERENCED TO MLW·APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPX LF):·EXISTING OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·WIDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW (APPX):·TIDAL DATUM:··MHW (NAVD)=··MLW (NAVD)=NOTES:"DAGOSTINO & WOOD, INC."01-08-19-1.66'0.32'34.0703503RD ST WMANGROVES HAVE BEEN REMOVEDPER PERMIT # 0373834-001MLWL = -0.5'(NAVD 1988)MHWL = -0.0'(NAVD 1988)EXISTINGTOP OF BANKPROPERTYLINERIPARIAN LINERIPARIAN LINE9.A.4.dPacket Pg. 606Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) p:\19019.00 moody - 267 3rd st\CAD\PERMIT-STATE\19019-MOODY-STATE.dwg 7/9/2019NESW051020SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@turrell-associates.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\19019.00 moody - 267 3rd st\CAD\PERMIT-STATE\19019-MOODY-STATE.dwg PROPOSED AERIAL 7/9/2019THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:JRRMJ06-14-1919019.00-525MOODY - 267 3RD STPROPOSED AERIAL WITH DIMIENSIONS48-------------------03 OF 04·SURVEY COURTESY OF:··SURVEY DATED:·THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY ANDARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.·ALL DATUM SHOWN HEREON IS REFERENCED TO MLW·APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPX LF):·EXISTING OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·WIDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW (APPX):·TIDAL DATUM:··MHW (NAVD)=··MLW (NAVD)=NOTES:·PROPOSED OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·TOTAL OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·TOTAL PROTRUSION FROM MHWL:"DAGOSTINO & WOOD, INC."01-08-19-1.66'0.32'34.07035049349347'PROPOSED 15'X15' LIFTRIPARIAN LINERIPARIAN LINEPROPOSED16'X16' LIFTPROPOSEDFIXED DOCK54'5'47'38'38'AA101PROPOSEDCANOPY16'X16'PROPOSEDCANOPY16'X16'16'15'9.A.4.dPacket Pg. 607Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) x - 4 . 9 - 5.9 xx - 4 . 5 0248SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@turrell-associates.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\19019.00 moody - 267 3rd st\CAD\PERMIT-STATE\19019-MOODY-STATE.dwg CROSS SECTION 7/9/2019THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:JRRMJ06-14-1919019.00-525MOODY - 267 3RD STAA CROSS SECTION48-------------------04 OF 0416' BOAT LIFT15' BOAT LIFT5'MHWL = +0.32' NAVDMLWL = -1.66' NAVDPROPOSED DOCKPROPOSEDCANOPIESALL PILES TO BE WRAPPEDWITH PVC 1FT ABOVE MHWLAND 1FT BELOW SUBSTRATE9.A.4.dPacket Pg. 608Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) ATTACHMENT II 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 609 Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) REPLY TO ATTENTION OF Regulatory Division DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY JACKSONVILLE DISTRICT CORPS OF ENGINEERS P.O. BOX 4970 JACKSONVILLE FLORIDA 32232-0019 March 27, 2018 DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT GENERAL PERMIT SAJ-20 SAJ-2006-00617 (TLW) PRIVATE RESIDENTIAL DOCKS/PIER FACILITIES AND MINOR STRUCTURES IN FLORIDA Upon recommendation of the Chief of Engineers, pursuant to Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 (33 U.S.C. 403), general authority is hereby given to construct private residential dock facilities and install minor structures in navigable waters of the United States within the State of Florida subject to the following conditions: SPECIAL CONDITIONS: 1.Private residential docks/pier facilities shall be designed to accommodate not more than four (4) motorized vessels, including those that may be dry stored such as but not limited to personal watercraft, unless a Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission approved Manatee Protection Plan is more restrictive (approved MPPs are available at http://myfwc.com/wildlifehabitats/managed/manatee/protection- plans/). This includes normal appurtenances such as boat hoists, boat shelters with open sides, stairways, walkways, mooring pilings, dolphins, and maintenance of same. 2.Other minor structures authorized under this general permit include: a.single mooring pilings; b.small mooring dolphins (not to exceed a cluster of four); c.non-commercial information signage; d.boat lifts, hoists, davits. Etc. e.other minor structures that would have less environmental impact than a small dock. 3.No work shall be performed until the applicant submits satisfactory plans for the proposed structure and receives written authorization from the District Engineer. 4.The following areas are specifically excluded from authorization under SAJ-20: 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 610 Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) General Permit SAJ-20 a. Motorboat prohibited zones, no entry zones, and Federal Manatee Sanctuaries. b. All areas regulated under the Lake Okeechobee and Okeechobee Waterway Shoreline Management Plan, located between St. Lucie Lock in Martin County and W.P. Franklin Lock in Lee County. c. Biscayne Bay National Park Protection Zone (Dade County), and areas identified in the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 U.S.C. 1317, et seq.): the St. Mary's River, from its headwaters to its confluence with the Bells River; the entire Wekiva River, including Wekiwa Springs Run, Rock Springs Run, the entire Seminole Creek, and Black Water Creek from its outfall at Lake Norris to its confluence with the Wekiva River; and the Loxahatchee River from Riverbend Park downstream to Jonathan Dickinson State Park. d. The following state parks: John Pennekamp Coral Reef State Park, Lignum Vitae Key State Botanical Site and Aquatic Preserve, Long Key State Park, Curry Hammock State Park, and Bahia Honda State Park. e. Kings Bay/Crystal River/Homosassa/Salt River system (Citrus County) and canals connected to these waterways. f. Lake Miccosukee (located on the common boundary of Leon and Jefferson Counties). g. Within the coastal lakes, their outfalls and/or the shore areas between the lakes and the Gulf of Mexico as depicted on the attached map (Attachment 1). h. New and expanded pile supported structures in Elkhorn coral (Acropora palmata) and Staghorn coral (Acropora cervicornis) designated critical habitat (Attachment 2) where essential features are present. i . Areas on or contiguous to ocean beaches. j. Smalltooth sawfish limited exclusion zones (Attachment 3). 5. No structures shall be authorized by SAJ-20 within the boundaries of the Timucuan Ecological and Historical Preserve (Duval County) until the National Park Service has been contacted and offered the opportunity to submit comments to the Corps on the effects of the proposed project on the preserve. 6. SAJ-20 has undergone consultation with U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) and the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) in accordance with Section 7, Endangered Species Act, on Federally listed species and designated critical habitat within their purview (Attachment 4). If the proposed activity requires additional consultation under the 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 611 Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) General Permit SAJ-20 Endangered Species Act with the FWS and/or NMFS on: 1) these or any other federally listed threatened or endangered species or species proposed for Federal listing; or 2) designated critical habitat or proposed designated critical habitat for these or any other federally listed threatened or endangered species, or proposed species, then, until consultation is reinitiated and concluded, and the agency determines that the activi ty will not jeopardize the continued existence or adversely modify critical habitat, the proposed activity cannot be authorized under SAJ-20. 7. Prior to verification of authorization, the dichotomous key titled, "The Corps of Engineers, Jacksonville District, and the State of Florida Effect Determination Key for the Manatee in Florida, April 2013," (see http://www.saj.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory/SourceBook.aspx) will be used to determine potential manatee impacts. Those determined to be a "may affect" to the manatee will not be authorized unless consistent with the 2011 Manatee Programmatic Consultation or individual consultation on the project is required and has been reinitiated and concluded with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service in accordance with the Endangered Species Act. Additionally, depending on the location of the project, some projects determined to be "may affect, not likely to adversely affect" will not be authorized until consultation on the project has been concluded. Consultation or concurrence from the Service is required for any project located within a Warm Water Aggregation Area (WWAA). Note: The manatee key may be subject to revision at any time. It is our intention that the most recent version of this technical tool will be utilized during the evaluation of the permit application. 8. For projects in waters accessible to manatees, the Permittee will utilize the "Standard Manatee Conditions for In-Water Work, 2011" (see http://www.saj.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory/SourceBook.aspx) and/or requirements as appropriate for the proposed activity. Note: The manatee conditions may be subject to revision at any time. It is our intention that the most recent version of these conditions will be utilized during the evaluation of the permit application. 9. Structures authorized under this general permit must satisfy the Project Design Criteria (PDCs) provided for all activities and pile-supported structures as stated in the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Jacksonville District’s Programmatic Biological Opinion, November 2017 (JAXBO). In accordance with the Endangered Species Act, the Corps will seek individual consultation with the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) for all projects that do not comply with the PDCs of JAXBO prior to verification. Please note that failure to comply with the attached PDCs, where a take of listed species occurs, would constitute an unauthorized take, and noncompliance with this general permit. The NMFS is the appropriate authority to enforce the terms and conditions of JAXBO. The most current version of JAXBO can be accessed at the Jacksonville District Regulatory Division internet webpage in the Endangered Species section of the Sourcebook located at: http://www.saj.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory/SourceBook.aspx Note: JAXBO may be subject to revision at any time. It is our intention that the most recent version of these conditions will be utilized during the evaluation of the permit application. 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 612 Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) General Permit SAJ-20 10.The Permittee shall adhere to the NOAA Fisheries Service Vessel Strike Avoidance Measures and Reporting /or Mariners (Attachment 8) (see http://www. saj. usace.army .mil/Missions/Regulatory/SourceBook.aspx). 11.In accordance with Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, projects proposed within the following areas cannot be authorized until consultation on the projects have been concluded with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS): Within Gulf sturgeon designated critical habitat under the jurisdictional responsibility of the USFWS; within areas with federally listed freshwater mussels, mussel critical habitat, or freshwater mussels proposed for federal listing. These areas include the range of the Suwanee moccasinshell The Suwannee Moccasinshell’s current range in Florida includes: the Suwannee River mainstem from the confluence of Hart Springs (– 82.954, 29.676) in Dixie–Gilchrist Counties, upstream 137 km (85 mi) to the confluence of the Withlacoochee River (–83.171, 30.385) in Madison–Suwannee Counties; and the Santa Fe River from its confluence with the Suwannee River in Suwannee–Gilchrist Counties (–82.879, 29.886), upstream 50 km (31 mi) to the river’s rise (the Santa Fe River runs underground for more than three miles, emerging at River Rise Preserve State Park) in Alachua County (–82.591, 29.873). 12.Projects proposing installation of any size of metal piling or metal sheet piling by impact hammer cannot be authorized under SAJ-20 until individual consultation has been initiated and concluded with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and/or the National Marine Fisheries Service, as appropriate 13.No work shall be authorized by SAJ-20 which may have direct or indirect adverse impacts to hard or soft corals, including listed corals, mangroves, estuarine emergent vegetation, marine emergent vegetation, and/or the following species of submerged aquatic vegetation: shoal grass (Halodule wrightii), paddle grass (Halophila decipiens), star grass (Halophila engelmanni), Johnson's seagrass (Halophila johnsonii ), widgeon grass (Ruppia maritima), manatee grass (Syringodium filiforme ), and turtle grass (Thalassia testudinum). Indirect effects include secondary and cumulative effects. 14.Adverse impacts to aquatic vegetation from dock construction shall be avoided by adherence to the joint U.S. Army Corps of Engineers'/National Marine Fisheries Service's "Construction Guidelines in Florida for Minor Piling-Supported Structures Constructed in or over Submerged Aquatic Vegetation (SAV), Marsh or Mangrove Habitat - U.S. Army Corps of Engineers/National Marine Fisheries Service - August 2001" (see http://www.saj.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory/SourceBook.aspx). Note: The Construction Guidelines may be subject to revision at any time. It is our intention that the most recent version of the technical tool will be utilized during the evaluation of the permit application. 15.This permit does not authorize dredging or the removal of red mangrove (Rhizophora mangle). 16.For projects proposed adjacent to Federally-maintained channels, no structure, 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 613 Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) General Permit SAJ-20 including mooring piles, authorized under this regional general permit shall be within the established setback, calculated from the near design edge of the channel, until coordination and concurrence by the Navigation business line is complete. The setback may vary between different Federal channels and between specific reaches of the same Federal channel. Exact locations of the proposed work may be verified by use of the Florida State Plane Coordinate System (XY coordinates). Any activity within Federal project lands including rights-of-way, may require the permittee to enter into a consent-to-easement or other real estate instrument with the Real Estate Division, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Jacksonville or Mobile District, as appropriate, prior to the commencement of any construction activity. 17. For projects authorized under the SAJ-20 in navigable waters of the United States, the Permittee understands and agrees that, if future operations by the United States require the removal, relocation, or other alteration, of the structures or work herein authorized, or if in the opinion of the Secretary of the Army or his authorized representative, said structure or work shall cause unreasonable obstruction to the free navigation of the navigable waters, the Permittee will be required, upon due notice from the Corps of Engineers, to remove, relocate, or alter the structural work or obstructions caused thereby, without expense to the United States. No claim shall be made against the United States on account of any such removal or alteration. A structure authorized under this regional general permit must not interfere with general navigation. 18. No activity may cause more than a minimal adverse effect on navigation. Any safety lights and signals prescribed by the U.S. Coast Guard, through regulations or otherwise, must be installed and maintained at the Permittee's expense on authorized facilities in navigable waters of the United States. 19. To maintain no less than 50% of the open-water portion of the waterbody available for public use, structures constructed on canals or channels must not extend more than 25% of the canal/channel width, excluding dense areas of shoreline vegetation such as mangroves, as measured from the project location to the opposite shoreline. 20. Any proposed regulatory action that modifies, alters, or is built upon or adjacent to an existing federal project, does not meet the required Setback Guidance or is constructed within a federal project right-of-way may require permission under Section 14 of the RHA 33 USC 408 (Section 408) and may require coordination with the Engineering Division. Any structure within 62.5 feet of a federal navigation structure (with the exception of single-family docking structures) shall require coordination under Section 408. Any degradation, relocation, penetration, or work under a Corps levee, dike, dam, or water retaining structure and any proposed work within 15 feet of a federal canal top of bank (such as the Okeechobee Waterway or the Central and South Florida Flood Control Canals), within two feet of the top edge of slope of a federal navigation channel or within 50 feet of a Corps dam requires coordination under Section 408. 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 614 Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) General Permit SAJ-20 21. Cultural Resources/Historic Properties: a. No structure or work shall adversely affect, impact or disturb properties listed in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) or those eligible for inclusion in the NRHP. b. If during the ground disturbing activities and construction work within the permit area, there are archaeological/cultural materials encountered which were not the subject of a previous cultural resources assessment survey (and which shall include, but not be limited to: pottery, modified shell, flora, fauna, human remains, ceramics, stone tools or metal implements, dugout canoes, evidence of structures or any other physical remains that could be associated with Native American cultures or early colonial or American settlement), the Permittee shall immediately stop all work in the vicinity and notify the Corps within two calendar days. The Corps shall then notify the Florida State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) and the appropriate Tribal Historic Preservation Officer(s) (THPO(s)) to assess the significance of the discovery and devise appropriate actions. c. Additional cultural resources assessments may be required of the permit area in the case of unanticipated discoveries as referenced in accordance with the above Special Condition ; and if deemed necessary by the SHPO, THPO(s), or Corps, in accordance with 36 CFR 800 or 33 CFR 325, Appendix C (5). Based, on the circumstances of the discovery, equity to all parties, and considerations of the public interest, the Corps may modify, suspend or revoke the permit in accordance with 33 CFR Part 325.7. Such activity shall not resume on non-federal lands without written authorization from the SHPO for finds under his or her jurisdiction, and from the Corps. d. In the unlikely event that unmarked human remains are identified on non-federal lands, they will be treated in accordance with Section 872.05 Florida Statutes. All work and ground disturbing activities within a 100-meter diameter of the unmarked human remains shall immediately cease and the Permittee shall immediately notify the medical examiner, Corps, and State Archeologist within the same business day (8 -hours). The Corps shall then notify the appropriate SHPO and THPO(s). Based, on the circumstances of the discovery, equity to all parties, and considerations of the public interest, the Corps may modify, suspend or revoke the permit in accordance with 33 CFR Part 325.7. Such activity shall not resume without written authorization from the State Archeologist and from the Corps. 22. No work shall be performed until after the Permittee provides notification to the owner(s) or operator(s) of any marked utilities in the area of the structure. 23. Turbidity control measures may be required, and the work must be conducted so as to prevent violations of State Water Quality Standards as established in sections 62-4.242 and 62-4.244 of the Florida Administrative Code and Chapters 62-302, 62-520, 62-522, and 62-550 of the Florida Administrative Code. 24. Water Quality Certification (WQC) or waiver thereto, and Coastal Zone 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 615 Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) General Permit SAJ-20 Consistency (CZCC): Activities qualifying for this regional general permit (RGP) must be authorized by the applicable permit or exemption under Part IV of Chapter 373, F.S., and by any authorization required to use or occupy state -owned submerged lands (SSL) under Chapter 253, F.S., and, as applicable Chapter 258 F.S. Such permit, issued by the Department of Environmental Protection, a water management district under s. 373.069, F.S., or a local government with delegated authority under s. 373.441, F.S., will provide the applicable WQC or waiver thereto, and CZCC. WQC is waived for activities authorized under this RGP that qualify for an exemption under s. 403.813(1)(i) or 373.406, F.S., or the rules of Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.) adopted under Part IV of Chapter 373, F.S. The Corps under C.F.R. § 325.2(b)(2) may presume CZCC for the above exempt activities by operation of s. 380.23(7), F.S., provided the activity receives the applicable authorization to use and occupy SSL under Chapter 253, F.S., and, as applicable, Chapter 258, F.S., and the rules F.A.C. adopted thereunder. The Corps shall not be precluded from acting on a request to use this RGP before the applicable SSL authorization is granted. 25. This authorization does not include conditions that would prevent the 'take' of a state-listed fish or wildlife species. These species are protected under sec. 379.411, Florida Statutes, and listed under Rule 68A-27, Florida Administrative Code. With regard to fish and wildlife species designated as species of special concern or threatened by the State of Florida, you are responsible for coordinating directly with the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC). You can visit the FWC license and permitting webpage (http://www.myfwc.com/license/wildlife/) for more information, including a list of those fish and wildlife species designated as species of special concern or threatened. The Florida Natural Areas Inventory (http://www.fnai.org/) also maintains updated lists, by county, of documented occurrences of those species. 26. Conformance with the descriptions and criteria contained herein does not necessarily guarantee authorization under this regional general permit. The District Engineer reserves the right to require that any request for authorization under this regional general permit be processed as a standard permit. 27. This regional general permit will be valid for a period of five years from the date specified above unless suspended or revoked by the District Engineer prior to that date. If SAJ- 20 expires or is revoked prior to completion of the authorized work, authorization of activities that have commenced or are under contract to commence in reliance on SAJ-20 will remain in effect provided the activity is completed within 12 months of the date SAJ-20 expired or was revoked. 28. The Permittee shall perform all work in accordance with the general conditions for permits. The general conditions attached hereto are made a part of this permit (Attachment 5). 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 616 Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) General Permit SAJ-20 BY AUTHORITY OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY: Enclosures: Attachment 1 Coastal Lakes Attachment 2 Elkhorn and Staghorn coral critical habitat maps Attachment 3 Smalltooth Sawfish Exclusion Zones Attachment 4 Effect determinations for Federally listed species in Florida Attachment 5 General Conditions For Timika M. Wilson Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army District Commander 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 617 Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) Regional General Permit SAJ-20 Attachment 1 . Florida Pa nha ndl e Coa sta l Dune La kes 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 618 Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) Regional General Permit SAJ-20 Attachment 2. 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 619 Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) Attachment 3. Smalltooth sawfish limited exclusion zones The locations of very small juveniles shown as red dots (©2012 Google; red dots based on the National Sawfish Encounter Database, May 2011). Name Latitude Longitude U.S. 41 Bridges (the area between the following coordinates) U.S. 41 NW 26.660413°N 81.885243°W U.S. 41 NE 26.666827°N 81.872966°W U.S. 41 SW 26.642991°N 81.873880°W U.S. 41 SE 26.649405°N 81.861605°W Iona Cove (the area between the following coordinates) IC NW 26.521437°N 81.991586°W IC NE 26.521212°N 81.976191°W IC SW 26.511762°N 81.991762°W IC SE 26.511537°N 81.976368°W Glover Bight (the area between the following coordinates) GB NW 26.542971°N 81.997791°W GB NE 26.542678°N 81.977745°W GB SW 26.529478°N 81.998035°W GB SE 26.529185°N 81.977992°W Cape Coral (the area between the following coordinates) CC 1 26.551662°N 81.947412°W CC 2 26.551561°N 81.940683°W CC 3 26.539075°N 81.940916°W CC 4 26.539205°N 81.951049°W CC 5 26.542181°N 81.951047°W CC 6 26.542133°N 81.947776°W 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 620 Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) Attachment 4 Federally Listed Species in Florida Consultation for Regional General Permit SAJ-20 Private Single-family Docks/Piers and Minor Structures in Florida Finding Agency Status Species Listing MAMMALS NE FWS E Bat, Grey (Myotis grisescens) NE FWS E Bat, Florida Bonneted (Eumops floridanus) NE FWS E Deer, Key (Odocoileus virginianus clavium) MANLAA FWS* E Manatee, West Indian (Trichechus manatus) NE FWS E Mouse, Anastasia Island Beach (Peromyscus polionotus phasma) NE FWS* E Mouse, Choctawhatchee Beach (Peromyscus polionotus al/ophrys) NE FWS E Mouse, Key Largo Cotton (Peromyscus gossypinus al/apaticola) NE FWS* E Mouse, Perdido Key Beach (Peromyscus polionotus trissyllepsis) NE FWS T Mouse, Southeastern Beach (Peromyscus po/ionotus niveiventris) NE FWS* E Mouse, St. Andrew Beach (Peromyscus po/ionotus peninsularis) NE FWS E Panther, Florida (Puma conco/or coryi) NE FWS E Rabbit, Lower Keys Marsh (Sylvilagus palustris hefneri) NE FWS* E Rice Rat (Lower FL Keys) (Oryzomys palustris natator) NE FWS E Vole, Florida Salt Marsh (Microtus pennsylvanicus dukecampbelli) NE NMFS E Whale, Blue (Balaenoptera musculus) NE NMFS E Whale, Finback (Balaenoptera physalus) NE NMFS E Whale, Humpback (Megaptera novaeangliae) NE NMFS* E Whale, Right (Eubalaena g/acialis) NE NMFS E Whale, Sei (Balaenoptera borealis) NE NMFS E Whale, Sperm (Physeter macrocephalus) NE FWS E Wolf, Red (Canis rufus) NE FWS E Woodrat, Key Largo (Neotoma f/oridana smalli) Finding Agency Status BIRDS NE FWS T Caracara, Audubon's Crested (Polyborus plancus audubonii) NE FWS T Jay, Florida Scrub (Aphe/ocoma coerulescens) NE FWS* E Kite, Everglade Snail (Rostrhamus sociabilis plumbeus) NE FWS* T Plover, Piping (Charadrius me/odus) NE FWS T Rufus red knot (Calidris canutus rufa) NE FWS E Sparrow, Cape Sable Seaside (Ammodramus(=Ammospiza) maritimus mirabilis) NE FWS E Sparrow, Florida Grasshopper (Ammodramus savannarum floridanus) NE FWS E Stork, Wood (Mycteria americana) NE FWS T Tern, Roseate (Stema dougallii dougallii) NE FWS E Warbler, Bachman's (Vermivora bachmanii) NE FWS E Warbler, Kirtland's (Dendroica kirt/andii) NE FWS E Woodpecker, Red-cockaded (Picoides borealis) Finding Agency Status REPTILES & AMPHIBIANS NE FWS* T Crocodile, American (Crocodylus acutus) NE FWS* T Salamander, Frosted Flatwoods (Ambystoma cingulatum) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 621 Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) REPTILES & AMPHIBIANS continued Finding Agency Status Species Listing NE FWS* E Salamander, Reticulated Flatwoods (Ambystoma bishopi) MANLAA NMFS/FWS E Sea Turtle, Green (Chelonia mydas) MANLAA NMFS/FWS E Sea Turtle, Hawksbill (Eretmochelys imbricata) MANLAA NMFS/FWS NMFS/FWS E Sea Turtle, Kemp's ridley (Lepidochelys kempii) MANLAA NMFS/FWS E Sea turtle, Leatherback (Dermoche/ys coriacea) MNALAA NMFS/FWS E Sea Turtle, Loggerhead (Caretta caretta) NE FWS T Skink, Bluetail Mole (Eumeces egregius lividus) NE FWS T Skink, Sand (Neoseps reynoldsi) NE FWS T Snake, Atlantic Salt Marsh (Nerodia clarkii taeniata) NE FWS T Snake, Eastern Indigo (Drymarchon corais couperi) FISH Finding Agency Status Species Listing NE FWS T Darter, Okaloosa (Etheostoma okaloosae) MANLAA NMFS E Sawfish, Smalltooth (Pristis pectinata) MANLAA NMFS/FWS* T Sturgeon, Gulf (Acipenser oxyrinchus desotoi) MANLAA NMFS E Sturgeon, Shortnose (Acipenser brevirostrum) MANLAA NMFS E Sturgeon, Atlantic (Acipenser oxyrinchus oxyrinchus) INVERTEBRATES Finding Agency Status Species Listing MANLAA FWS* T Bankclimber, Purple (Elliptoideus sloatianus) MANLAA FWS* E Bean, Choctaw (Villosa choctawensis) NE FWS E Butterfly, Schaus Swallowtail (Heraclides aristodemus ponceanus) NE NMFS* T Coral, Elkhorn (Acropora palmata) NE NMFS* T Coral, Staghorn (Acropora cervicomis) MANLAA FWS* E Ebonyshell, Round (Fosconaia rotulata) MANLAA FWS* E Kidneyshell, Southern (Pfychobranchus jonest) MANLAA FWS* E Moccasinshell, Gulf (Medionidus penicillatus) MANLAA FWS E Moccasinshell, Suwanee (Medionidus walkeri) MANLAA FWS* E Moccasinshell, Ochlockonee (Medionidus simpsonianus) MANLAA FWS* T Pigtoe, Tapered (Fusconaia burket) MANLAA FWS* T Pigtoe, Narrow (Fusconaia Escambia) MANLAA FWS* E Pigtoe, Oval (Pleurobema pyriforme) MANLAA FWS* T Pigtoe, Fuzzy (Pleurobema strodeanum) MANLAA FWS* E Pocketbook, Shinyrayed (Lampsilis subangu/ata) MANLAA FWS* T Sandshell, Southern (Hamiota australis) NE FWS T Shrimp, Squirrel Chimney Cave (Palaemonetes cummingi) MANLAA FWS* T Slabshell, Chipola (Elliptio chipo/aensis) NE FWS T Snail, Stock Island Tree (Orthalicus reses) MANLAA FWS* E Three-ridge, Fat (Amblema neislerii) PLANTS Finding Agency Status Species Listing NE FWS E Beargrass, Britten's (Nolina brittoniana) NE FWS E Beauty, Harper's (Harperoca/lis flava) NE FWS E Bellflower, Brooksville (Campanula robinsiae) NE FWS T Birds-in-a-nest, White (Macbridea alba) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 622 Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) PLANTS continued Finding Agency Status Species Listing NE FWS E Blazingstar, Scrub (Liatris ohlingerae) NE FWS T Bonamia, Florida (Bonamia grandiflora) NE FWS T Buckwheat, Scrub (Eriogonum /ongifolium gnaphalifolium) NE FWS T Butterwort, Godfrey's (Pinguicu/a ionantha) NE FWS E Cactus, Key tree (Pilosocereus robinii) NE FWS E Campion, Fringed (Silene polypetala) NE FWS E Chaffseed, American (Schwalbea americana) NE FWS E Cladonia, Florida Perforate (Cladonia perforata) NE FWS E Fringe-tree, Pygmy (Chionanthus pygmaeus) NE FWS T Gooseberry, Miccosukee (Ribes echinel/um) NE FWS E Gourd, Okeechobee (Cucurbita okeechobeensis okeechobeensis) NE FWS E Harebells, Avon Park (Crotalaria avonensis) NE FWS E Hypericum, Highlands Scrub (Hypericum cumulicola) NE FWS E Jacquemontia, Beach (Jacquemontia reclinata) NE FWS E Lead-plant, Crenulate (Amorpha crenulata) NE FWS E Lupine, Scrub (Lupinus aridorum) NE FWS E Meadowrue, Cooley's (Tha/ictrum cooleyi) NE FWS E Milkpea, Small's (Ga/actia smal/ii) NE FWS E Mint, Garrett's (Dicerandra christmanii) NE FWS E Mint, Lakela's (Dicerandra immacu/ata) NE FWS E Mint, Longspurred (Dicerandra comutissima) NE FWS E Mint, Scrub (Dicerandra frutescens) NE FWS E Mustard, Carter's (Warea carteri) NE FWS E Pawpaw, Beautiful (Deeringothamnus pu/che/lus) NE FWS E Pawpaw, Four-petal (Asimina tetramera) NE FWS E Pawpaw, Rugel's (Deeringothamnus rugelii) NE FWS T Pigeon Wings (Clitoria fragrans) NE FWS E Pinkroot, Gentian (Spigelia gentianoides) NE FWS E Plum, Scrub (Prunus geniculata) NE FWS E Polygala, Lewton's (Po/yga/a lewtonii) NE FWS E Polygala, Tiny (Polygala smallii) NE FWS E Prickly-apple, fragrant (Cereus eriophorus fragrans) NE FWS E Rhododendron, Chapman (Rhododendron chapmanii) NE FWS E Rosemary, Apalachicola (Conradina glabra) NE FWS E Rosemary, Etonia (Conradina etonia) NE FWS E Rosemary, Short-leaved (Conradina brevifolia) NE FWS E Sandlace (Po/ygone/la myriophylla) MANLAA AA NMFS2 T Seagrass, Johnson's (Halophila johnsonii) NE FWS T Skullcap, Florida (Scutellaria floridana) NE FWS E Snakeroot (Eryngium cuneifolium) NE FWS E Spurge, Deltoid (Chamaesyce deltoidea deltoidea) NE FWS T Spurge, Garber's (Chamaesyce garberi) NE FWS T Spurge, Telephus (Euphorbia telephioides) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 623 Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) PLANTS continued Finding Agency Status Species Listing NE FWS E Torreya, Florida (Torreya taxifolia goveniana) NE FWS E Warea, Wide-leaf (Warea amplexifolia) NE FWS E Water-willow, Cooley's (Justicia cooleyi) NE FWS T Whitlow-wort, Papery (Paronychia chartacea) NE FWS E Wireweed (Polygonel/a basiramia) NE FWS E Ziziphus, Florida (Ziziphus celata) Endangered (E), Threatened (T), Candidate Species (C), U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (FWS), National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), No Effect (NE), May Affect Not Likely to Adversely Affect (MANLAA), Likely to Adversely Affect (LAA) *Finding also applies to Designated Critical Habitat 1 - LAA for Smalltooth sawfish Designated Critical Habitat 2 - LAA for Johnson's seagrass Designated Critical Habitat 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 624 Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) Attachment 5 GENERAL CONDITIONS FOR DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY GENERAL PERMITS: 1.The time limit for completing the work authorized ends on March 27, 2023. If you find that you need more time to complete the authorized activity, submit your request for a time extension to this office for consideration at least one month before the above date is reached. 2. You must maintain the activity authorized by this permit in good condition and in conformance with the terms and conditions of this permit. You are not relieved of this requirement if you abandon the permitted activity, although you may make a good faith transfer to a third party in compliance with General Condition 4 below. Should you wish to cease to maintain the authorized activity or should you desire to abandon it without a good faith transfer, you must obtain a modification of this permit from this office, which may require restoration of the area. 3. If you discover any previously unknown historic or archeological remains while accomplishing the activity authorized by this permit, you must immediately notify this office of what you have found. We will initiate the Federal and State coordination required to determine if the remains warrant a recovery effort or if the site is eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. 4. If you sell the property associated with this permit, you must obtain the signature and the mailing address of the new owner in the space provided and forward a copy of the permit to this office to validate the transfer of this authorization. 5. If a conditioned water quality certification has been issued for your project, you must comply with the conditions specified in the certification as special conditions to this permit. For your convenience, a copy of the certification is attached if it contains such conditions. 6. You must allow representatives from this office to inspect the authorized activity at any time deemed necessary to ensure that it is being or has been accomplished in accordance with the terms and conditions of your permit. 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 625 Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) Further Information: 1. Limits of this authorization. a. This permit does not obviate the need to obtain other Federal, State, or local authorizations required by law. b. This permit does not grant any property rights or exclusive privileges. c. This permit does not authorize any injury to the property or rights of others. d. This permit does not authorize interference with any existing or proposed Federal projects. 2. Limits of Federal Liability. In issuing this permit, the Federal Government does not assume any liability for the following: a. Damages to the permitted project or uses thereof as a result of other permitted or unpermitted activities or from natural causes. b. Damages to the permitted project or uses thereof as a result of current or future activities undertaken by or on behalf of the United States in the public interest. c. Damages to persons, property, or to other permitted or unpermitted activities or structures caused by the activity authorized by this permit. d. Design or construction deficiencies associated with the permitted work. e. Damage claims associated with any future modification, suspension, or revocation of this permit. 3. Reliance on Applicant's Data: The determination of this office that issuance of this permit is not contrary to the public interest was made in reliance on the information you provided. 4. Reevaluation of Permit Decision: This office may reevaluate its decision on this permit at any time the circumstances warrant. Circumstances that could require a reevaluation include, but are not limited to, the following: a. You fail to comply with the terms and conditions of this permit. b. The information provided by you in support of your permit application proves to have been false, incomplete, or inaccurate (see 4 above). c. Significant new information surfaces which this office did not consider in reaching the original public interest decision. Such a reevaluation may result in a determination that it is appropriate to use the suspension, modification, and revocation procedures contained in 33 CFR 325.7 or enforcement procedures such as those contained in 33 CFR 326.4 and 326.5. The referenced enforcement procedures provide for the issuance of an administrative order 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 626 Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) requiring you comply with the terms and conditions of your permit and for the initiation of legal action where appropriate. You will be required to pay for any corrective measures ordered by this office, and if you fail to comply with such directive, this office may in certain situations (such as those specified in 33 CFR 209.170) accomplish the corrective measures by contract or otherwise and bill you for the cost. 5. When the structures or work authorized by this permit are still in existence at the time the property is transferred, the terms and condition s of this permit will continue to be binding on the new owner(s) of the property. To validate the transfer of this permit and the associated liabilities associated with compliance with its terms and conditions, have the transferee sign and date below. _______________________________________ ____________________ (TRANSFEREE-SIGNATURE) (DATE) _______________________________________ (NAME-PRINTED) _______________________________________ (ADDRESS) ______________________________________________________ (CITY, STATE, AND ZIP CODE) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 627 Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) ATTACHMENT III 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 628 Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) SELF-CERTIFICATION STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE Permit Number: RGP-20 Application Number: SAJ-2019-03011 Permittee’s Name & Address (please print or type):___________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ Telephone Number:____________________________________________________________ Location of the Work:___________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ Date Work Started:____________________ Date Work Completed:______________________ PROPERTY IS INACCESSIBLE WITHOUT PRIOR NOTIFICATION: YES ______ NO_______ TO SCHEDULE AN INSPECTION PLEASE CONTACT _______________________________ AT __________________________ Description of the Work (e.g. bank stabilization, residential or commercial filling, docks, dredging, etc.):________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ Acreage or Square Feet of Impacts to Waters of the United States: ______________________ Describe Mitigation completed (if applicable): ________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ Describe any Deviations from Permit (attach drawing(s) depicting the deviations): ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ******************** I certify that all work, and mitigation (if applicable) was done in accordance with the limitations and conditions as described in the permit. Any deviations as described above are depicted on the attached drawing(s). ______________________________ Signature of Permittee ______________________________ Date 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 629 Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT TRANSFER REQUEST PERMIT NUMBER: SAJ-2019-03011(GP-EPL) When the structures or work authorized by this permit are still in existence at the time the property is transferred, the terms and conditions of this permit will continue to be binding on the new owner(s) of the property. Although the construction period for works authorized by Department of the Army permits is finite, the permit itself, with its limitations, does not expire. To validate the transfer of this permit and the associated responsibilities associated with compliance with its terms and conditions, have the transferee sign and date below and mail to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Enforcement Section, Post Office Box 4970, Jacksonville, FL 32232-0019. ___________________________________ ___________________________ (TRANSFEREE-SIGNATURE) (SUBDIVISION) ___________________________________ ___________ ____________ (DATE) (LOT) (BLOCK) __________________________ __________________________________ (STREET ADDRESS) (NAME-PRINTED) ___________________________________ ___________________________________ (MAILING ADDRESS) ___________________________________ (CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 630 Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) ATTACHMENT IV 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 631 Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Jacksonville District's Programmatic Biological Opinion (JaxBO) Project Design Criteria (PDCs) for In-Water Activities November 20, 2017 1) (AP.7.) Education and Observation: The permittee must ensure that all personnel associated with the project are instructed about the potential presence of species protected under the ESA and the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA). All on-site project personnel are responsible for observing water-related activities for the presence of protected species. All personnel shall be advised that there are civil and criminal penalties for harming, harassing, or killing ESA-listed species or marine mammals. To determine which species may be found in the project area, please review the relevant Protected Species List at: http://sero.nmfs.noaa.gov/protected_resources/section_7/threatened_endangered/in dex.html 2) (AP.8.) Reporting of interactions with protected species: a) Any collision(s) with and/or injury to any sea turtle, sawfish, whale, or sturgeon occurring during the construction of a project, shall be reported immediately to NMFS’s Protected Resources Division (PRD) at (1-727-824-5312) or by email to takereport.nmfsser@noaa.gov and SAJ-RD-Enforcement@usace.army.mil. b) Smalltooth sawfish: Report sightings to 1-844-SAWFISH or email Sawfish@MyFWC.com c) Sturgeon: Report dead sturgeon to 1-844-STURG 911 (1-844-788-7491) or email nmfs.ser.sturgeonnetwork@noaa.gov d) Sea turtles and marine mammals: Report stranded, injured, or dead animals to 1- 877-WHALE HELP (1-877-942-5343). e) North Atlantic right whale: Report injured, dead, or entangled right whales to the USCG via VHF Channel 16. 3) (AP.9.) Vessel Traffic and Construction Equipment: All vessel operators must watch for and avoid collision with species protected under the ESA and MMPA. Vessel operators must avoid potential interactions with protected species and operate in accordance with the following protective measures: a) Construction Equipment: i) All vessels associated with the construction project shall operate at “Idle Speed/No Wake” at all times while operating in water depths where the draft of the vessel provides less than a 4-foot (ft) clearance from the bottom, and in all depths after a protected species has been observed in and has departed the area. ii) All vessels will follow marked channels and/or routes using the maximum water depth whenever possible. iii) Operation of any mechanical construction equipment, including vessels, shall cease immediately if a listed species is observed within a 50-ft radius of 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 632 Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) construction equipment and shall not resume until the species has departed the area of its own volition. iv) If the detection of species is not possible during certain weather conditions (e.g., fog, rain, wind), then in-water operations will cease until weather conditions improve and detection is again feasible. b) All Vessels: i) Sea turtles: Maintain a minimum distance of 150 ft. ii) North Atlantic right whale: Maintain a minimum 1,500-ft distance (500 yards). iii) Vessels 65 ft in length or longer must comply with the Right Whale Ship Strike Reduction Rule (50 CFR 224.105) which includes reducing speeds to 10 knots or less in Seasonal Management Areas (http://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/pr/shipstrike/). iv) Mariners shall check various communication media for general information regarding avoiding ship strikes and specific information regarding right whale sightings in the area. These include NOAA weather radio, USCG NAVTEX broadcasts, and Notices to Mariners. v) Marine mammals (i.e., dolphins, whales [other than North Atlantic right whales], and porpoises): Maintain a minimum distance of 300 ft. vi) When these animals are sighted while the vessel is underway (e.g., bow- riding), attempt to remain parallel to the animal’s course. Avoid excessive speed or abrupt changes in direction until they have left the area. vii) Reduce speed to 10 knots or less when mother/calf pairs or groups of marine mammals are observed, when safety permits. 4) (AP.10.) Turbidity Control Measures during Construction: Turbidity must be monitored and controlled. Prior to initiating any of the work covered under this Opinion, the Permittee shall install turbidity curtains as described below. In some instances, the use of turbidity curtains may be waived by the USACE project manager if the project is deemed too minimal to generate turbidity (e.g., certain ATON installation, scientific survey device placement, marine debris removal) or if the current is too strong for the curtains to stay in place. Turbidity curtains specifications: a) Install floating turbidity barriers with weighted skirts that extend to within 1 ft of the bottom around all work areas that are in, or adjacent to, surface waters. b) Use these turbidity barriers throughout construction to control erosion and siltation and ensure that turbidity levels within the project area do not exceed background conditions. c) Position turbidity barriers in a way that does not block species’ entry to or exit from designated critical habitat. d) Monitor and maintain turbidity barriers in place until the authorized work has been completed and the water quality in the project area has returned to background conditions. e) In the range of ESA-listed corals (St. Lucie Inlet, Martin County south to the Dry Tortugas and the U.S. Caribbean) and Johnson’s seagrass (Turkey Creek/Palm 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 633 Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) Bay south to central Biscayne Bay in the lagoon systems on the east coast of Florida): i) Projects that include upland earth moving (e.g., grading to install a building or parking lot associated with a dock and seawall project), must install sediment control barriers to prevent any upland sediments from reaching estuarine or marine waters. ii) The turbidity curtain requirement cannot be waived for any project that moves or removes sediment (e.g., dredging, auger to create a pile, trenching to install a cableline). If turbidity curtains are not feasible in an area based on site conditions such as water current, high wave action, or stormy conditions, the project must undergo individual Section 7 consultation and is not covered under this Programmatic Opinion. 5) (AP.11.) Entanglement: All turbidity curtains and other in-water equipment must be properly secured with materials that reduce the risk of entanglement of marine species (described below). Turbidity curtains likewise must be made of materials that reduce the risk of entanglement of marine species. a) In-water lines (rope, chain, and cable, including the lines to secure turbidity curtains) must be stiff, taut, and non-looping. Examples of such lines are heavy metal chains or heavy cables that do not readily loop and tangle. Flexible in- water lines, such as nylon rope or any lines that could loop or tangle, must be enclosed in a plastic or rubber sleeve/tube to add rigidity and prevent the line from looping and tangling. In all instances, no excess line is allowed in the water. b) Turbidity curtains and other in-water equipment must be placed in a manner that does not entrap species within the construction area or block access for them to navigate around the construction area. 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 634 Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) ATTACHMENT V 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 635 Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE Southeast Regional Office 263 13th Avenue South St. Petersburg, FL 33701 SEA TURTLE AND SMALLTOOTH SAWFISH CONSTRUCTION CONDITIONS The permittee shall comply with the following protected species construction conditions: a. The permittee shall instruct all personnel associated with the project of the potential presence of these species and the need to avoid collisions with sea turtles and smalltooth sawfish. All construction personnel are responsible for observing water-related activities for the presence of these species. b. The permittee shall advise all construction personnel that there are civil and criminal penalties for harming, harassing, or killing sea turtles or smalltooth sawfish, which are protected under the Endangered Species Act of 1973. c. Siltation barriers shall be made of material in which a sea turtle or smalltooth sawfish cannot become entangled, be properly secured, and be regularly monitored to avoid protected species entrapment. Barriers may not block sea turtle or smalltooth sawfish entry to or exit from designated critical habitat without prior agreement from the National Marine Fisheries Service’s Protected Resources Division, St. Petersburg, Florida. d. All vessels associated with the construction project shall operate at “no wake/idle” speeds at all times while in the construction area and while in water depths where the draft of the vessel provides less than a four-foot clearance from the bottom. All vessels will preferentially follow deep-water routes (e.g., marked channels) whenever possible. e. If a sea turtle or smalltooth sawfish is seen within 100 yards of the active daily construction/dredging operation or vessel movement, all appropriate precautions shall be implemented to ensure its protection. These precautions shall include cessation of operation of any moving equipment closer than 50 feet of a sea turtle or smalltooth sawfish. Operation of any mechanical construction equipment shall cease immediately if a sea turtle or smalltooth sawfish is seen within a 50-ft radius of the equipment. Activities may not resume until the protected species has departed the project area of its own volition. f. Any collision with and/or injury to a sea turtle or smalltooth sawfish shall be reported immediately to the National Marine Fisheries Service’s Protected Resources Division (727-824- 5312) and the local authorized sea turtle stranding/rescue organization. g. Any special construction conditions, required of your specific project, outside these general conditions, if applicable, will be addressed in the primary consultation. Revised: March 23, 2006 O:\forms\Sea Turtle and Smalltooth Sawfish Construction Conditions.doc 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 636 Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) ATTACHMENT VI 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 637 Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) STANDARD MANATEE CONDITIONS FOR IN-WATER WORK 2011 The permittee shall comply with the following conditions intended to protect manatees from direct project effects: a. All personnel associated with the project shall be instructed about the presence of manatees and manatee speed zones, and the need to avoid collisions with and injury to manatees. The permittee shall advise all construction personnel that there are civil and criminal penalties for harming, harassing, or killing manatees which are protected under the Marine Mammal Protection Act, the Endangered Species Act, and the Florida Manatee Sanctuary Act. b. All vessels associated with the construction project shall operate at "Idle Speed/No Wake” at all times while in the immediate area and while in water where the draft of the vessel provides less than a four-foot clearance from the bottom. All vessels will follow routes of deep water whenever possible. c. Siltation or turbidity barriers shall be made of material in which manatees cannot become entangled, shall be properly secured, and shall be regularly monitored to avoid manatee entanglement or entrapment. Barriers must not impede manatee movement. d. All on-site project personnel are responsible for observing water-related activities for the presence of manatee(s). All in-water operations, including vessels, must be shutdown if a manatee(s) comes within 50 feet of the operation. Activities will not resume until the manatee(s) has moved beyond the 50-foot radius of the project operation, or until 30 minutes elapses if the manatee(s) has not reappeared within 50 feet of the operation. Animals must not be herded away or harassed into leaving. e. Any collision with or injury to a manatee shall be reported immediately to the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) Hotline at 1-888-404-3922. Collision and/or injury should also be reported to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service in Jacksonville (1-904-731-3336) for north Florida or Vero Beach (1-772-562-3909) for south Florida, and to FWC at ImperiledSpecies@myFWC.com f. Temporary signs concerning manatees shall be posted prior to and during all in-water project activities. All signs are to be removed by the permittee upon completion of the project. Temporary signs that have already been approved for this use by the FWC must be used. One sign which reads Caution: Boaters must be posted. A second sign measuring at least 8 ½” by 11" explaining the requirements for “Idle Speed/No Wake” and the shut down of in-water operations must be posted in a location prominently visible to all personnel engaged in water-related activities. These signs can be viewed at MyFWC.com/manatee. Questions concerning these signs can be sent to the email address listed above. 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 638 Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) CAUTION: MANATEE HABITAT All project vessels IDLE SPEED / NO WAKE When a manatee is within 50 feet of work all in-water activities must SHUT DOWN Report any collision with or injury to a manatee: Wildlife Alert: 1-888-404-FWCC (3922) cell * FWC or #FWC 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 639 Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 640 Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 641 Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 642 Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 643 Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 644 Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 645 Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 646 Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 647 Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 648 Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 649 Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 650 Attachment: Attachment D - Back Up Materials (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) Ini), HHl ' ~;j OCTOBER 27, 1987 Ite.'7Bl USOLU'1'IOlf 87-210, PBTITIOlf 110-87-17C, COJOl1l1fITY DIVBLOPHBlCT DIVISIOII UQt1BSTIBCJ .ROVISIOlfAL UBI "1\" OP m1I asP-4 DISTRICT POR MOlf-COHKIRCIAL BOAT LAUHCRI}~ PACILITIES - ADOPTED Planner Weeks stated the property is located approximately 1/4 mile south of Bonita Beach Road, and 3/4 mile ~eBt of Vanderbilt Drive in the Littl., Hickory Shores Subdivision. He stated that the Board directed staff to initiate a Provisional Use for this property beca- use of the small lot size which cannot be used for a principal struc- ture. He said it appears that these lots were intended for boat' " dock lots, however, that is not indicated on the plat. Mr. Weeks stated the rr,PC has reviewed this petition and forwarded it with 8'reeommendation of approval. He said correspondence on this petition was received, with six letters in favor and one in oppositiort. He noted the letter of op~osition was due to misinformation and after clarification by Staff, the objection was verbally withdrawn. Staff teeommends approval. In;re.pon.e to Chairman Hasse, planning/Zoning Director McKim stated .the docks are for private use only, however, renting of boat' docks is a problem throughout the County. She explained that Staff only becomes aware of this type of violation if there is a complaint. co..issioner .istor moved, seconded by commissioner Goodnight and oarried unenimously, that Resolution 87-260, .etition 'U-87-17C, for non-co~eroial boat launohing faoillties for property looated approximately 1/4 mile south of Bonite Beaoh Road and 3/4 mil. .est of Vanderbilt Driv., be adopted. n.),; q r'-'1, prr.q -,11'.1J, i; j ~ t I' c:~t!~ !b r 9.A.4.e Packet Pg. 651 Attachment: Attachment C - Resolution 1987-260 (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) RESOLOTIOII 87- ~O OCT 271987 REUTlNG TO PI:TITlON 110. PU-87-17C FOR PROVISIONAL USI! OF PROPERTY IIEREINAFTER DESCRIBED IN COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA. WHEREAS. tho LoShll.turo of tho St.to of Florido in Ch.ptor 67...1246, Lav. of Florid... and Chapter 125, Florida Statut.., h.. conferred Oft Collier CoUlJty the power to .at.bIt_h, coordinate and. 1'DI!orcI 1001nl and' .uch bu.inl.' rl.ulation. a. ar. uc....ry for thu prot.ction of tha pubU.c; and lREllEAS, Th. CoUDty purauant thlrlto ha. adoptld a eo.pr.han.lv. Zoning Ordinlncl ..tlbU.bins rlsulationa for the zonins of particullr I.llsr.phie divialona of the County. allOnl which 1a the Irautina of prllvi81on.al n.a.; and WHEREAS. the Colli.. County Pl.nnins eo..t..ion, beinl the duly pl,ointod .nd conotitutod platlninl bo.rd for tho .r.. horoby .ffoctld. hall b.ld . pubil.c h....i.n. .ftar Dotic. al in .aid r.gulat10111 ..d. Ind pt'lTf'ld.d. and ba. couaid.r.d the advlubl1ity of Proviliona1 U.. "a" in I lSF-4 zona for the prop4lrty harelnafter de.cribed. and baa found II a uttar of fact (Exhibit "A") tbat satilfaetary prCTf'illan and arrAngement ba. baen ..de eoncernlnl all applicabla ..ttlr. rlquirld by aid ra.ulation. and in 'lccordancl with Section 13 - 1d of thl ZoniDI Rogulation. for tho Collio.. County Pl.nDins eo-i..ionl .nd W'RER.!AS. all intlrllll:ld plrtil. ha". baln si"ln opportunity to be h..rd by thia Bo.rd in public ..otinl ......blod .nd tho Bo.rd ,,"viDl coneidar.d all _tt.r. pre:lantld. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED. BY THE BOARD or ZOlIIRG APPEALS of ColIior County, Florid. th.t tho potition of Co.ouDity Dovolop..nt 01"i.ioo. repra..ntiq tM 50ard 'Jf County Coadaaionerl, rith rllpect to the proparty herlinaftlr d.lcrib.d a.: loti 1 through 23, Block "en. Little Hickory Shore.. Unlt 13. II rlcorded in P~lt Book 6, PI.e 2. Official R.cord. of Collior County 1m lU9 Fl~l 27 9.A.4.e Packet Pg. 652 Attachment: Attachment C - Resolution 1987-260 (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) I""" 109fl'ot 28 l..'" b. and i:,\ I, OCT 271987 the .... i. hareby approved for Pt'ovl11onal U.. "a" of the ISr-4 lonlna diltrict for Non-t::o...rclal BOlt Lnunchlng Facf lit i.. t aubj.~t to tho follov1ns conditionl' a.At tial of obtaicinl a dock pl.-it, I risht-of-vay porait shall b. obtained Ind the owner ,hall provide Ree... iaprov...ntl to prevlnt daus_ to the rOldway and roadwlY drainlSI laprov...ntl. b. All boat doclta aractad on thl lubjoct lota ..ot cOllply with Section 8.46 of tho Zonins Ordinanco (82-2). BE IT FURTlIEIl RESOLVED that tbia raloluUon bl racordad in tha aioutal of thia acard. eo-i..loner offorad tha forlsoina rOlolutionPlator nd 8OVod itl adoption. ..condod by eoa.iaaionor C"'.nMl"d c:1hfo and upon roll call, the vote va.: AlESI Commissioners Pistor, Goodnight, Glass, Saunders and Hasse NATS I None AIlSEIIT AlID lOT VOTING. Ilone AIlSTEIlTIOII: None Ilcm. tbia 27th OCtober 1987.day of IOAlD or Z0II111G APPEALS COLL~' FLOlIDA" ~ ST. a IlAltA. SIt.J"'~ t\',\o/?la" Attta't, JAII!S"Cl. GILES. CLItRX BY'~-::"""")y~....5 vfr~ Magn, ~ty Clerk APPlllVED AS TO FOIlK A/lD LEGAL ~lJFFICIEJlCYI a ~,*..~ R. IlUCE I OM ASSISTAIIT COU1ITT ATTOlUIET PU-87-I7C ....olution 9.A.4.e Packet Pg. 653 Attachment: Attachment C - Resolution 1987-260 (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) OCT 271987 EXIIIIIIT A FIIIDIlIO OF FACT BT COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR A PROVISIONAL USE PETITION FOR PU-87-17C The followina facti ar. founds 1. Saction 7. I lb. ) ) (.) prntaloGa 1 u... of the Zoning OrdinancI authorized the 2. Grantina the prov1aionaI u.o viII not adv.r..ly affoct tha public inter.at and viII not adyer..ly .ffact othlr property or u... In the .... d1atrict or nailbborhood bICIU.. of: A. Caneral complianc. with the Comprahenlivl Plan: Compll.. with Comprehlnlivl Plan Tn..&.. No_ B. Ingr... and ISr... to prop.rty and propo..d structural thereon with particular raflrlncl to automotive Ind ped.ltri.D ..laty and convlniencl, traffic flow and control. and ace... in c... of fira or cata.trophl: Ad.qu.t~nlr... , aar... T.I -Z::.- Ko_ c. Affectl nlighbor101 proplrtie. in relation to noi.., alarl, economic or odor Iffectl: No .ff.ct or Affoct mitis.tod by Afflct cannot be _itig.ted D. Conaral compatibility vith adjacent proportio. and othor proporty in tho diotrict. Compatiblo uoa vithin diatrict Too ')( No _ I...d on the above flDd1nsa, this provisional use . stipulations, (copy attachld) (.k9~lA Mft~) b. rae DATE. /~/i7 I nID1IIll OF FACT FOIII oo~ JL()l}Pl~[ ~!} 9.A.4.e Packet Pg. 654 Attachment: Attachment C - Resolution 1987-260 (12154 : Moody BDE PL20190001962) 06/11/2020 COLLIER COUNTY Collier County Planning Commission Item Number: 9.A.5 Item Summary: VA-PL20190002360 A Resolution of the Board of Zoning Appeals relating to VA-PL20190002360 for a variance from Land Development Code Section 5.03.06 to reduce the minimum side yard riparian setbacks to zero, for the benefit of Lot 8, Block G, Little Hickory Shores, Unit 3 Replat subdivision, also known as 267 3rd Street in Section 5, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. (Companion item to BDE-PL20190001962) [Coordinator: John Kelly, Senior Planner] Meeting Date: 06/11/2020 Prepared by: Title: Planner – Zoning Name: John Kelly 04/01/2020 1:52 PM Submitted by: Title: Manager - Planning – Zoning Name: Ray Bellows 04/01/2020 1:52 PM Approved By: Review: Zoning Ray Bellows Review Item Completed 04/01/2020 3:52 PM Growth Management Operations & Regulatory Management Donna Guitard Review Item Completed 04/13/2020 11:09 AM Road Maintenance Diane Lynch Review item Completed 04/13/2020 3:42 PM Growth Management Department James C French Review Item Completed 04/17/2020 8:44 PM Zoning Ray Bellows Review Item Completed 04/20/2020 3:03 PM Planning Commission Mark Strain Meeting Pending 06/11/2020 9:00 AM 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 655 9.A.5.aPacket Pg. 656Attachment: Staff Report VA-PL20190002360 - FINAL (12155 : Moody VA-PL20190002360) 9.A.5.aPacket Pg. 657Attachment: Staff Report VA-PL20190002360 - FINAL (12155 : Moody VA-PL20190002360) 9.A.5.aPacket Pg. 658Attachment: Staff Report VA-PL20190002360 - FINAL (12155 : Moody VA-PL20190002360) 9.A.5.aPacket Pg. 659Attachment: Staff Report VA-PL20190002360 - FINAL (12155 : Moody VA-PL20190002360) 9.A.5.aPacket Pg. 660Attachment: Staff Report VA-PL20190002360 - FINAL (12155 : Moody VA-PL20190002360) 9.A.5.aPacket Pg. 661Attachment: Staff Report VA-PL20190002360 - FINAL (12155 : Moody VA-PL20190002360) 9.A.5.aPacket Pg. 662Attachment: Staff Report VA-PL20190002360 - FINAL (12155 : Moody VA-PL20190002360) 38 Moody Variance / VA-PL20190002360 5/19/20 1 of 2 RESOLUTION 2020 -____ A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS RELATING TO A VARIANCE FROM LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTION 5.03.06 TO REDUCE THE MINIMUM SIDE YARD RIPARIAN SETBACKS TO ZERO, FOR THE BENEFIT OF LOT 8, BLOCK G, LITTLE HICKORY SHORES, UNIT 3 REPLAT SUBDIVISION, ALSO KNOWN AS 267 3RD STREET W. IN SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. [PL20190002360] WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida in Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, has conferred on all counties in Florida the power to establish, coordinate and enforce zoning and such business regulations as are necessary for the protection of the public; and WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a Land Development Code (LDC) (Ordinance No. 2004-41, as amended) which establishes regulations for the zoning of particular geographic divisions of the County, among which is the granting of variances; and WHEREAS, the Collier County Board of Zoning Appeals has held a public hearing after notice as in said regulations made and provided, and has considered the advisability of a variance from Land Development Code Section 5.03.06 to reduce the minimum side yard riparian setbacks to zero, as shown on the attached Exhibit "A", in the Residential Single-Family (RSF-4) Zoning District for the property hereinafter described, and has found as a matter of fact that satisfactory provision and arrangement have been made concerning all applicable matters required by said regulations and in accordance with Section 9.04.00 of the Zoning Regulations of said Land Development Code for the unincorporated area of Collier County; and WHEREAS, all interested parties have been given opportunity to be heard by this Bo ard in public meeting assembled, and the Board having considered all matters presented. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA that: Petition Number VA-PL20190002360, filed by Jeff Rogers with Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc., on behalf of Equity Trust Company Custodian FBO William M. Moody IRA, with respect to the property hereinafter described as: LOT 8, BLOCK G, REPLAT OF UNIT NO. 3, LITTLE HICKORY SHORES, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 6, PAGE 2, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. Folio No. 56000960000 9.A.5.b Packet Pg. 663 Attachment: Attachment A - VA RESOLUTION; 5_19_20 (12155 : Moody VA-PL20190002360) 38 Moody Variance / VA-PL20190002360 5/19/20 2 of 2 be and the same hereby is approved for a variance from Section 5.03.06 to reduce the minimum side yard riparian setbacks to zero, as shown on the Proposed Site Plan attached as Exhibit "A", in the RSF-4 zoning district. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution be recorded in the minutes of this Board. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote this ______ day of ________________, 2020. ATTEST: BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: _____________________________ By: _____________________________ , Deputy Clerk Burt L. Saunders, Chairman Approved as to form and legality: ___________________________ Sally A. Ashkar Assistant County Attorney Attachment: Exhibit A—Conceptual Site Plan 9.A.5.b Packet Pg. 664 Attachment: Attachment A - VA RESOLUTION; 5_19_20 (12155 : Moody VA-PL20190002360) 9.A.5.b Packet Pg. 665 Attachment: Attachment A - VA RESOLUTION; 5_19_20 (12155 : Moody VA-PL20190002360) 9.A.5.b Packet Pg. 666 Attachment: Attachment A - VA RESOLUTION; 5_19_20 (12155 : Moody VA-PL20190002360) 9.A.5.b Packet Pg. 667 Attachment: Attachment A - VA RESOLUTION; 5_19_20 (12155 : Moody VA-PL20190002360) STATE OF FLORIDACOUNTY AERIAL VICINITY MAPSTATE OF FLORIDACOUNTY AERIAL VICINITY MAPNOTES:<> THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SUBJECTPROPERTYSUBJECTPROPERTYSUBJECTPROPERTY<> LATITUDE:N 26.326931<> LONGITUDE:W 81.831553SITE ADDRESS:<> 267 3RD ST W, LOT #8BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@turrell-associates.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\19019.00 moody - 267 3rd st\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\19019-MOODY-COUNTY-VARIANCE.dwg LOCATION 3/4/2020THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:JRRMJ09-18-1919019.00RMJ525MOODY - 267 3RD STLOCATION MAP48RMJRMJ--12-05-1902-15-2003-04-20--JRJRJR--REV. PER CONTY COMMENTSSHEET 02SHEETS 02-03--01 OF 03NESWCOLLIER COUNTYCOLLIER COUNTY)7.(1(/':+%1)7.(1(/':+%18588288641MARCOISLANDEVERGLADESCITY9329846NAPLES90908399483783784129292983983992887846951862I-758486431856850846890896KEY WESTTAMPAFT.MYERSMIAMINAPLES9.A.5.cPacket Pg. 668Attachment: Attachment B - Staff Exhibits (12155 : Moody VA-PL20190002360) p:\19019.00 moody - 267 3rd st\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\19019-MOODY-COUNTY-VARIANCE.dwg 3/4/2020NESW051020SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@turrell-associates.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\19019.00 moody - 267 3rd st\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\19019-MOODY-COUNTY-VARIANCE.dwg PROPOSED AERIAL 3/4/2020THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:JRRMJ09-18-1919019.00RMJ525MOODY - 267 3RD STPROPOSED DOCK WITH DIMENSIONS48RMJRMJ--12-05-1902-15-2003-04-20--JRJRJR--ADDED NOTEREVISED LABELSADDED BULKHEAD LINE, REV LABELS--02 OF 03·SURVEY COURTESY OF:··SURVEY DATED:·THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY ANDARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.·ALL DATUM SHOWN HEREON IS REFERENCED TO MLW·APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPX LF):·EXISTING OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·WIDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW (APPX):·TIDAL DATUM:··MHW (NAVD)=··MLW (NAVD)=NOTES:·PROPOSED OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·TOTAL OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·TOTAL PROTRUSION FROM MHWL:·LOT WIDTH:PROPOSED 15'X15' LIFTRIPARIAN LINERIPARIAN LINEPROPOSED16'X16' LIFTPROPOSEDFIXED DOCK54'5'47'38'38'16'15'1.7 'MLWL = -0.5' (NAVD 1988)PROPERTY LINE &MHWL =-0.0' (NAVD 1988)ADJACENTDOCKADJACENT DOCKADJACENTPILINGSEXISTINGTOP OF BANK"DAGOSTINO & WOOD, INC."01-08-19-1.66'0.32'34.07035023723747'34.07PLATTEDBULKHEADLINE. 3 ' 1'EDGE OF PILINGON RIPARIAN LINEEDGE OF PILINGON RIPARIAN LINE9.A.5.cPacket Pg. 669Attachment: Attachment B - Staff Exhibits (12155 : Moody VA-PL20190002360) p:\19019.00 moody - 267 3rd st\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\19019-MOODY-COUNTY-VARIANCE.dwg 3/4/2020NESW03060120SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@turrell-associates.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\19019.00 moody - 267 3rd st\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\19019-MOODY-COUNTY-VARIANCE.dwg ST OVERLAY 3/4/2020THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:JRRMJ09-18-1919019.00RMJ525MOODY - 267 3RD STST OVERLAY48----03-04-20----JR----ADDED BULKHEAD LINE----03 OF 03PROPOSEDFIXED DOCK& LIFTSST OVERLAY9.A.5.cPacket Pg. 670Attachment: Attachment B - Staff Exhibits (12155 : Moody VA-PL20190002360) 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 671 Attachment: Attachment B - Staff Exhibits (12155 : Moody VA-PL20190002360) 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 672 Attachment: Attachment B - Staff Exhibits (12155 : Moody VA-PL20190002360) 7 3_, 421 Iv LAST REVISION: ZONING 2/ 10/ 2020 OTHER The Historic/ Archaeological Probability Maps are the official 1r : County source designating historic or archaeologic resources. 4. mNA1. 1N+ z O Ou C C 3/ z m' mm>>;zazz == m n mmz C ao0v a20Z 8506N 30 N_ Ilcn Z ANOD357N- 2555. 33' X03 x m " 7 s m m Z y a p''. Dr; w r o ulm m w n in 73Nn m l l co 0 D x ZONING NOTES m m co A 1 R- 82- 11- C a J 930 50 I coO 03 2 R- 87- 12C r I < 3 V- 88- 12 88- 282 I 1 Y 0° e s I m O CO o 0 0 I ` 8 1 m 6 3- 11- 97 V- 96- 33 97- 165 I S g' '+' v I 7 11- 19- 85 V- 85- 28C 85. 241 THIRD STREET WEST m J' 4 8 6. 25- 91 R• 91- 4 91- 54 I CO w I4,-_. G '• 1 O 9 6- 25- 91 PUD- 87- 12( 1) 91- 53 I O pN f'..''- 10 LDC- 91 1 m u 11 3- 5- 92 BD- 92- 1 92- 4 Z I a Q a, Cm 2 12 8- 6- 98 BD- 98- 28 98- 32 a L 133 m y 0- 1 a 13 12- 17- 92 8092. 9 92- 29 I O ( 7 - 311)' y C 14 5- 20- 93 8093- 5 93- 15 D I o! O j A m Q 15 5- 20- 93 BD- 93- 6 93- 14 I 03 `. iT. 0 16 11- 2393 V- 03- 29 93548 m I p -/ ww, 7. ?' ' O 17 12- 2- 93 BD- 93- 20 93- 37 7 CO OZ\ N 18 PDA- 85- 1, 2C 0) r fl IPA 19 PDA- 86- 17C 0 I m H 20 PDA- 86- 18C n I 07 O 0 " „© 0 A s s`.. 27 8- 2. 88 PDA- 08- 7 88- 63 C J 22 1- 25- 94 V- 9334 9436 r I 350' 23 3- 894 V- 94- 1 94- 158 u 24 10- 27- 87 PU- 87- 17C 87- 260 I O m O+ lit 25 5- 24- 94 PUD- 77- 19( 6) 94- 28 m Co I Z Ai w y' 26 6- 15- 95 8095- 1 95- 19 ID-' 1` 27 9- 7- 95 13095- 13 95- 31 I I-' o 28 9- 12- 95 V- 95- 12 95- 533 M i m74 lit 29 11- 2- 95 130- 95- 18 95- 47 m N w 30 12- 12- 95 R- 95- 8 95- 75 IC I 0332 9- 10- 96 V- 96- 131 1- 9- 96 - 86296- 419 0 96- 1I o 1„ m HCO m u v co 33 10- 3- 96 BD- 96- 15m96- 35 I O r w G-, y 34 11- 12- 96 PUD- 82- 11( 4) 96- 69 u J R Dow W N 0-, 35 12- 5- 96 BD- 96- 22 96- 46 I I m a - I Cm m a- 36 a w 36 12- 19- 96 BD- 96- 23 96- 47 I N y m I. G' w a 37 1- 14- 97 8097- 22 97- 50 C O v '" ON m O N mO 38 4- 3- 97 BD- 974 97- 12 I O I a m w a 39 4- 22- 97 CU- 97- 6 97- 223 I as zit' J 2 0 m 40 5- 15- 97 80- 97- 11 97- 18 O w 2 - a C 0> m y m 41 7- 3- 97 BD- 97- 16 97- 32 O= - v O m O O 2 G Z N w i 42 9- 457 BD- 97- 17 97- 36 O C 0 f3 y (' a 0 ) O O m 0 i III, '. 4 43 6- 4- 98 BD- 98- 10 98- 20 C v S1) 0 m z z 1 y H 73 44 5- 21- 98 BD- 98- 20 98- 25 z-1 r w O C m 0 m m 45 9- 17- 98 8D- 9830 98- 39 I' M CO 0 0a xi - 3< m m 1 m 46 9- 17- 98 P0198. 4 8- 38 0t zTl Oq w 03 1: 13 V D m ' 1 m - m 47 11- 5- 98 BD- 98- 32 98- 46 C 8/ 1o Om Ow a a , m; A i XI' -- 48 11- 5- 98 BD- 98. 34 98- 47 03 G < 0 Ca w n - n O Oy m 0 O 49 12- 17- 98 BD- 98- 38 98- 55 a m Oa O • n 8 7o m zyc° o 50 12- 3- 98 BD- 9836 98- 53 p 0) N w0^ 2 • a r m ° T 51 5- 11- 99 CU- 99- 4 99- 236 C Oo` w 1 N D7 1 52 6- 3- 99 BD- 993 99- 22 COC A w NO F w o w Q a Y F. p 53 8- 19- 99 8059- 16 99- 30 U1 w 0 mz 54 8- 5- 99 BD- 99- 12 99- 28 0) Cu y u 2 w ti a 1 I- 55 55 10. 26. 99 V- 99- 13 99- 400 I I I w > m 56 1- 20- 00 80. 99. 26 00- 01 I° i.- mpL. WEST AVENUEn 57 2- 8- 00 V99- 26 00. 51 T T O 58 3- 14- 00 V- 99- 27 00. 85 0 < 2 zi 59 2- 17- 00 BD- 99. 26 00- 03 m m 0 m m 0 w u 0 a , 0 0 XI< 60 5- 4- 00 BD- 00- 9 00- 5 y T w a w D 61 6- 1- 00 BD- 00- 8 00- 16 m J 0 r O 62 5- 23- 00 CU- 00- 1 00- 157 0 S ,,, - S . 0 w o m w O 63 7- 20- 00 B0- 00- 13 00- 19 Qe© CO J CO J 70 64 9. 7- 00 BD- 00- 18 00- 25 NCS, 0 A i y "' "' m a 65 10- 10- 00 V- 00. 18 00353 m ' al w m w' C1' n, a m - V o t O, tik 66 0 BD- 00- 26 0034 1 W. l N 68 5- 3- 01 - AR341 01- 09 a w m a a N m m o 68 6- 26- 010- PUDA- 01- AR- 546D11201- 55 m m/ P AO " Om 2(") 0 6910. 4- 01 BD- 01- AR- 1122 01- 25 4111111•401114:;• 41",, m ` 1 w J 70 4- 4- 02 BD- 01- AR- 1608 02- 03 N 0 m 0 — " w m iri 71 9- 5- 02 BD- 02- AR- 2416 02- 06A72 9- 16- 02 BD- 02- AR- 2564 02- OS D () E `" m "' ® 0a - 73 12- 19- 02 BD- 02- AR- 3079 02- 10 Z O-< T= dilLWfST DRIVE w a m 0 74 2- 5- 04 BD- 03- AR- 4689 04. 02 C7 T w 75 7- 15- 04 BD- 04- AR- 5697 04. 081+ 0 m 76 7- 15- 04 BD- 04- AR- 5699 04- 07Xm m D w a7T 7 14- 04 BD- 04- AR 5693 04 06 m Z m r I\ 06108 m m- m 82 5- 23- 06 P306- 22 Z r mzm w . EAST fyORiv m o 83 4- 19- 07 BD- 06- AR- 10900 07- 04 ( 7 r VALLEY m g m 84 5- 17- 07 BD- 06- AR- 11004 07- 05 my= m Co y- m a 1111111, DRIVE m 85 12- 6- 07 BD- 07- AR- 12154 07- 08 m. Z)-<-- w m 86 4- 22- 08 ADA- 07- AR- 12714 4 08- 119 I 11111111 m w m m w88 5-.- 10 BD- PL- 09- 11 08- 05 . Zml O Im- C W 0 - G' a 88 5- 6- 10 BD- PL- 09918 10- 02 m Z 0 7 I J TO m a v > 89 12- 2- 10 BD- PL- 10- 1297 10- 06 C+ Z1 . Z7 C —. e- w - A o w ICO 0 r m w 90 2- 3- 11 BD- PL- 10- 1313 11- 01Z Z m m 0 w t3 - A 0 91 2- 22- 11 PUDA- PL- 09- 742 11- 04 z• 0> D m- I s $ u 0 , u O m H N 92 9- 6- 12 BD- PL- 12- 26 12- 07 Z Z X 2 2_ 0 2X 0 CO to CO z CO 93 10- 6- 11 BD- PL- 10- 1473 11- 06 Q> 0 Z)( p a 2 O A r It p :' y _ m A m — 94 7- 20- 16 VA- PL- 15- 2429 I a m m_ m 0 z m w m Ir m m AND 80- PL- 1537 HEX- 16- 25 m a t. w O O m i m m - m 95 12- 20- 17 BD- PL- 16- 541 HEX- 17- 35 I Z- I 2 w Iy11 F E O 0 m a m 1 .-+ m 96 9- 11- 18 PUDA- PL- 17- 4421 18- 41 m' p> z N N < - E O m'- 97 1- 18- 19 BDE- PL- 17- 2736 HEX 19- 02 Z a y u(` o, ; i N y tI m m w m m 98 2- 21- 19 VA- PL- 18- 2673 HEX 19- 08 a c. a D D 73 I m m ., 99 1- 29- 20 BDE- PL- 18- 3700 HEX 20- 02 q) C 0 0 m a m y w a 100 1- 29- 20 VA- PL- 17- 1588 HEX 20- 03 C Z, 1. m 1 m 0 0 w 0 w 101 1- 28- 20 PUDA- PL- 19- 502 20- 07 1' I > t.• m73 ITI w 7.. i. 0 0 a w w a m ie W m m e C N C+ C D J l CN- 1' I C• T el0 0J P aO a m a,- C/ a w() DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS MODIFICATIONS 6 N - 1 0 12- 12- 95 R- 95- B 95- 75 Z? m m m m 2 N 2 Hw m w W V N m - FOREST AVENUE 2 4 Z m w y 17, w m M w m m m — ti m M M a m o y 2 N O a y m m y m v m u m u m m o l 2 u.,.,_ 1 4.4.,_ ly- w . U'm Y m XI mymmP qWV^• ILI DZ = EMI F a p a a a a 0 a iiii m w 2o c+ 1a N N N C 0 o ` k - 4 u - 3 13 N - m - fit VANDERBILT DRIVE( CR901) Ir m 1 1 p m D m " 0 y v n. K o Z Iii 01 al - 1 X , . q` 4G CCJ1 m Z 0 0 u N i t Z •• 0 < fr- y f3 LEE COUNTY N M O y 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 673 Attachment: Attachment B - Staff Exhibits (12155 : Moody VA-PL20190002360) KellyJohn From: Sent To: Cc: Subiect: Attachments: KellyJohn Friday, May 22,2020 2:15 PM KellyJohn BellowsRay BDE-P120190001962 and VA-P120190002360 - CCPC 06-11-20 SZA 07-14-2020 Public Hearing Sign Posting FF04ED7A-C8A8-4081 -AAEl -DBDD0D1 214A3 jpeg; 41 AC0C80-F73D-4EC4-9574- E7 6s821 5D222 jpeg; 0 1 D24359 -7 67 4 -4006-91 87- DA86C27 D37 DE jpeg Required public hearing signs for the referenced meetings were posted by me, one adjacent to the roadway at 257 3rd Street W -Lot 8 and the other waterfront, at approximately 12:00 P.M. this date as evidenced by the attached photographs. Respectfully, John Kelly senior Planner Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. lf you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. lnstead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. 1 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 674 Attachment: Attachment B - Staff Exhibits (12155 : Moody VA-PL20190002360) I t frs I -' i ar- .. I h 2 bf \ -.i I '.tt 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 675 Attachment: Attachment B - Staff Exhibits (12155 : Moody VA-PL20190002360) PUBLIC HEARING FOR Bo.t Oock Ertentlon Io Aib a a, l@l Ptsit-sr Pcddon l{o. m$lii!il79f,2 CCPC: Jun. ll, 2020.r g A.X.to VARIAilCE P.tlton t{o. 201 9000236l, CCPrC: Jun 11, 20im I A.ll. BCC: Juay trt, 2020 .r g A.f. Cotllar Co{nty Govamrnant Cantat - 3rfe9 f.ml..ml Tr.lt Er.l - 3d FloorCO Joln xatty. s.nE Pr..ne. \z}gt Z52.5t E DA ,q , t I f.t t .:'r iI,ft .)a .'l 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 676 Attachment: Attachment B - Staff Exhibits (12155 : Moody VA-PL20190002360) Ini), HHl ' ~;j OCTOBER 27, 1987 Ite.'7Bl USOLU'1'IOlf 87-210, PBTITIOlf 110-87-17C, COJOl1l1fITY DIVBLOPHBlCT DIVISIOII UQt1BSTIBCJ .ROVISIOlfAL UBI "1\" OP m1I asP-4 DISTRICT POR MOlf-COHKIRCIAL BOAT LAUHCRI}~ PACILITIES - ADOPTED Planner Weeks stated the property is located approximately 1/4 mile south of Bonita Beach Road, and 3/4 mile ~eBt of Vanderbilt Drive in the Littl., Hickory Shores Subdivision. He stated that the Board directed staff to initiate a Provisional Use for this property beca- use of the small lot size which cannot be used for a principal struc- ture. He said it appears that these lots were intended for boat' " dock lots, however, that is not indicated on the plat. Mr. Weeks stated the rr,PC has reviewed this petition and forwarded it with 8'reeommendation of approval. He said correspondence on this petition was received, with six letters in favor and one in oppositiort. He noted the letter of op~osition was due to misinformation and after clarification by Staff, the objection was verbally withdrawn. Staff teeommends approval. In;re.pon.e to Chairman Hasse, planning/Zoning Director McKim stated .the docks are for private use only, however, renting of boat' docks is a problem throughout the County. She explained that Staff only becomes aware of this type of violation if there is a complaint. co..issioner .istor moved, seconded by commissioner Goodnight and oarried unenimously, that Resolution 87-260, .etition 'U-87-17C, for non-co~eroial boat launohing faoillties for property looated approximately 1/4 mile south of Bonite Beaoh Road and 3/4 mil. .est of Vanderbilt Driv., be adopted. n.),; q r'-'1, prr.q -,11'.1J, i; j ~ t I' c:~t!~ !b r 9.A.5.d Packet Pg. 677 Attachment: Attachment C - Resolution 1987-260 (12155 : Moody VA-PL20190002360) RESOLOTIOII 87- ~O OCT 271987 REUTlNG TO PI:TITlON 110. PU-87-17C FOR PROVISIONAL USI! OF PROPERTY IIEREINAFTER DESCRIBED IN COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA. WHEREAS. tho LoShll.turo of tho St.to of Florido in Ch.ptor 67...1246, Lav. of Florid... and Chapter 125, Florida Statut.., h.. conferred Oft Collier CoUlJty the power to .at.bIt_h, coordinate and. 1'DI!orcI 1001nl and' .uch bu.inl.' rl.ulation. a. ar. uc....ry for thu prot.ction of tha pubU.c; and lREllEAS, Th. CoUDty purauant thlrlto ha. adoptld a eo.pr.han.lv. Zoning Ordinlncl ..tlbU.bins rlsulationa for the zonins of particullr I.llsr.phie divialona of the County. allOnl which 1a the Irautina of prllvi81on.al n.a.; and WHEREAS. the Colli.. County Pl.nnins eo..t..ion, beinl the duly pl,ointod .nd conotitutod platlninl bo.rd for tho .r.. horoby .ffoctld. hall b.ld . pubil.c h....i.n. .ftar Dotic. al in .aid r.gulat10111 ..d. Ind pt'lTf'ld.d. and ba. couaid.r.d the advlubl1ity of Proviliona1 U.. "a" in I lSF-4 zona for the prop4lrty harelnafter de.cribed. and baa found II a uttar of fact (Exhibit "A") tbat satilfaetary prCTf'illan and arrAngement ba. baen ..de eoncernlnl all applicabla ..ttlr. rlquirld by aid ra.ulation. and in 'lccordancl with Section 13 - 1d of thl ZoniDI Rogulation. for tho Collio.. County Pl.nDins eo-i..ionl .nd W'RER.!AS. all intlrllll:ld plrtil. ha". baln si"ln opportunity to be h..rd by thia Bo.rd in public ..otinl ......blod .nd tho Bo.rd ,,"viDl coneidar.d all _tt.r. pre:lantld. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED. BY THE BOARD or ZOlIIRG APPEALS of ColIior County, Florid. th.t tho potition of Co.ouDity Dovolop..nt 01"i.ioo. repra..ntiq tM 50ard 'Jf County Coadaaionerl, rith rllpect to the proparty herlinaftlr d.lcrib.d a.: loti 1 through 23, Block "en. Little Hickory Shore.. Unlt 13. II rlcorded in P~lt Book 6, PI.e 2. Official R.cord. of Collior County 1m lU9 Fl~l 27 9.A.5.d Packet Pg. 678 Attachment: Attachment C - Resolution 1987-260 (12155 : Moody VA-PL20190002360) I""" 109fl'ot 28 l..'" b. and i:,\ I, OCT 271987 the .... i. hareby approved for Pt'ovl11onal U.. "a" of the ISr-4 lonlna diltrict for Non-t::o...rclal BOlt Lnunchlng Facf lit i.. t aubj.~t to tho follov1ns conditionl' a.At tial of obtaicinl a dock pl.-it, I risht-of-vay porait shall b. obtained Ind the owner ,hall provide Ree... iaprov...ntl to prevlnt daus_ to the rOldway and roadwlY drainlSI laprov...ntl. b. All boat doclta aractad on thl lubjoct lota ..ot cOllply with Section 8.46 of tho Zonins Ordinanco (82-2). BE IT FURTlIEIl RESOLVED that tbia raloluUon bl racordad in tha aioutal of thia acard. eo-i..loner offorad tha forlsoina rOlolutionPlator nd 8OVod itl adoption. ..condod by eoa.iaaionor C"'.nMl"d c:1hfo and upon roll call, the vote va.: AlESI Commissioners Pistor, Goodnight, Glass, Saunders and Hasse NATS I None AIlSEIIT AlID lOT VOTING. Ilone AIlSTEIlTIOII: None Ilcm. tbia 27th OCtober 1987.day of IOAlD or Z0II111G APPEALS COLL~' FLOlIDA" ~ ST. a IlAltA. SIt.J"'~ t\',\o/?la" Attta't, JAII!S"Cl. GILES. CLItRX BY'~-::"""")y~....5 vfr~ Magn, ~ty Clerk APPlllVED AS TO FOIlK A/lD LEGAL ~lJFFICIEJlCYI a ~,*..~ R. IlUCE I OM ASSISTAIIT COU1ITT ATTOlUIET PU-87-I7C ....olution 9.A.5.d Packet Pg. 679 Attachment: Attachment C - Resolution 1987-260 (12155 : Moody VA-PL20190002360) OCT 271987 EXIIIIIIT A FIIIDIlIO OF FACT BT COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR A PROVISIONAL USE PETITION FOR PU-87-17C The followina facti ar. founds 1. Saction 7. I lb. ) ) (.) prntaloGa 1 u... of the Zoning OrdinancI authorized the 2. Grantina the prov1aionaI u.o viII not adv.r..ly affoct tha public inter.at and viII not adyer..ly .ffact othlr property or u... In the .... d1atrict or nailbborhood bICIU.. of: A. Caneral complianc. with the Comprahenlivl Plan: Compll.. with Comprehlnlivl Plan Tn..&.. No_ B. Ingr... and ISr... to prop.rty and propo..d structural thereon with particular raflrlncl to automotive Ind ped.ltri.D ..laty and convlniencl, traffic flow and control. and ace... in c... of fira or cata.trophl: Ad.qu.t~nlr... , aar... T.I -Z::.- Ko_ c. Affectl nlighbor101 proplrtie. in relation to noi.., alarl, economic or odor Iffectl: No .ff.ct or Affoct mitis.tod by Afflct cannot be _itig.ted D. Conaral compatibility vith adjacent proportio. and othor proporty in tho diotrict. Compatiblo uoa vithin diatrict Too ')( No _ I...d on the above flDd1nsa, this provisional use . stipulations, (copy attachld) (.k9~lA Mft~) b. rae DATE. /~/i7 I nID1IIll OF FACT FOIII oo~ JL()l}Pl~[ ~!} 9.A.5.d Packet Pg. 680 Attachment: Attachment C - Resolution 1987-260 (12155 : Moody VA-PL20190002360) 13 Al RESOLUTION NO. 2000-2.!.- RELATING TO PETITION NUMBER V-99-26 FOR A VARIANCE ON PROPERTY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED IN COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida in Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, has conferred on all counties in Florida the power to establish, coordinate and enforce zoning and such business regulations as are necessary for the protection of the public; and WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a Land Development Code Ordinance No. 91-102) which establishes regulations for the zoning of particular geographic divisions of the County, among which is the granting of variances; and WHEREAS, the Board of Zoning Appeals, being the duly elected constituted Board of the area hereby affected, has held a public hearing after notice as in said regulations made and provided, and has considered the advisability of a 7. 5-foot variance from the required side yard setback of 7.5 feet to -0- feet as shown on the attached plot plan, Exhibit "A", in an RSF-4 Zone for the property hereinafter described, and has found as a matter of fact that satisfactory provision and arrangement have been made concerning all applicable matters required by said regulations and in accordance with Section 2.7.5 of the Zoning Regulations of said Land Development Code for the unincorporated area of Collier County; and WHEREAS, all interested parties have been given opportunity to be heard by this Board in public meeting assembled, and the Board having considered all matters presented; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS of Collier County, Florida, that: The Petition V-99-26 filed by James M. Boswell, II, representing property owners of blocks "G" & "H" Little Hickory Shores Unit 3, with respect to the property hereinafter described as: Exhibit "B" be and the same hereby is approved for a 7.5-foot variance from the required side yard setback of 75 feet to -0- feet as shown on the attached plot plan, Exhibit "Au, of the RSF -4 Zoning District wherein said property is located, subject to the following conditions Exhibit "C" BE IT RESOLVED that this Resolution relating to Petition Number V-99-26 be recorded in the minutes of this Board. 1- 9.A.5.e Packet Pg. 681 Attachment: Attachment D - Resolution 2000-051 (12155 : Moody VA-PL20190002360) This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote. Done this 1S"4:h day of ~ ,2000. ATTEST: . . DWlGBT E. BROCK, Clerk A ,1>'- Attest 4S to Cha!,..n's J8.M.$J!cfts qB \1drrn and Legal Sufficiency: C1JIN'7Yl~ Mar 1 M. Scuden Assistant County Attorney g/adminJ RESOLl.JI10NN -99-26/CB/ts BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS COLLIER OUNTY, FLORIDA 2- 13 Al CHAIRMAN 9.A.5.e Packet Pg. 682 Attachment: Attachment D - Resolution 2000-051 (12155 : Moody VA-PL20190002360) 13 Al t7.th1' 5 tU7 {) . l ~ i: f'/(7~'.:' loordnule l 4,.... r::::: 6 3::~ ~. Z. 9 1\ \ I/~ " \;_ 1~ f0o~ r \.. lIfR181 htJf j)~t'" J 3(717)- ~ I TIJII' plg/l III" 8. 5.86 i 7(/ o Cl. u. 0- J!'ppro~e'J- MirJr Ll u 1"#.7..1'1'1 .:1"69 - '-". J~"~~II~" Nn;'~i/>-:-v'/7,1 Aj ?--~ -I '""Q C> c... AI ,1'.7J 'It I~ 1 .. I~, I ~ Q"~<~. 60' I \!PRM l\ i .!l ~ :::"!; t ~,~ l 'f~'" 1. 'i. ~ If j ;"Jd~ C>> tt-- .r~' I:> Q,... C" 7,. J '/J Jr. <j/lG' r.r()/'Iolll o/,~I.1'.:7r~J JQ"'/~J /, Iid~/'II Q/I.7 :.kcre/ory 1// L'JIII/!' I.f ,,/ //tJr/f/t7, /tJmr' j fC"r'f r:kcf. - ',7 '10'1 a.'1 N~ Ie I Ql'ld (J't>~d' <7f lId/II16'Y 171/i'''Cl1 II/en-IV un f' ,.. ./i.1 7<6/ -,.,-,/ d~",dl EXHIBIT A" r-. 9.A.5.e Packet Pg. 683 Attachment: Attachment D - Resolution 2000-051 (12155 : Moody VA-PL20190002360) 13 Al LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lots 3,4.5.6,7,8,9,10, Block "H" and Lots 4,5,9,10,11,12,14,17, 18, 19, 20, Block "G" Little Hickory Shores Unit 3, replat, as recorded in Plat Book 6, page 2 of Official Records of Collier County, Florida. EXHIBIT "B" 9.A.5.e Packet Pg. 684 Attachment: Attachment D - Resolution 2000-051 (12155 : Moody VA-PL20190002360) 13 At CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL V.99.26 This approval is conditioned upon the following stipulations requested by the Collier County Planning Commission in their public hearing on January 6, 2000. 1. These docks are private in nature and shall not be used for rental purposes. 2. These docks shall not be used for any commercial purposes including the mooring of commercial boats. EXHIBIT "C" 9.A.5.e Packet Pg. 685 Attachment: Attachment D - Resolution 2000-051 (12155 : Moody VA-PL20190002360) 9.A.5.f Packet Pg. 686 Attachment: Attachment E - Back Up Materials (12155 : Moody VA-PL20190002360) 9.A.5.f Packet Pg. 687 Attachment: Attachment E - Back Up Materials (12155 : Moody VA-PL20190002360) 9.A.5.f Packet Pg. 688 Attachment: Attachment E - Back Up Materials (12155 : Moody VA-PL20190002360) 9.A.5.f Packet Pg. 689 Attachment: Attachment E - Back Up Materials (12155 : Moody VA-PL20190002360) 9.A.5.f Packet Pg. 690 Attachment: Attachment E - Back Up Materials (12155 : Moody VA-PL20190002360) 9.A.5.f Packet Pg. 691 Attachment: Attachment E - Back Up Materials (12155 : Moody VA-PL20190002360) TURRELL, HALL & ASSOCIATES, INC. MARINE & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING 3584 Exchange Avenue ● Naples, Florida 34104-3732 ● 239-643-0166 ● Fax (239) 643-6632 ●Jeff@THAnaples.com 1. A detailed explanation of the request including what structures are existing and what is proposed; the amount of encroachment proposed using numbers, i.e. reduce front setback from 25 ft. to 18 ft.; when property owner purchased property; when existing principal structure was built (include building permit number(s) if possible); why encroachment is necessary; how existing encroachment came to be; etc. The subject property currently does not contain any docking facilities or artificial shoreline. The proposed work will entail a docking facility that will protrude 54-feet from the most restrictive point (TOP OF BANK) and will extend out into Little Hickory Bay. It will be constructed parallel to the neighboring docking facilities which have both received BDE and variances for side yard setbacks from Collier County. The dock will be 5-feet wide and will be approximately 3-feet above the mean high water and will have two boatlifts for two vessels up to 38-feet LOA. This variance petition seeks to reduce the riparian line setbacks to 0-feet as most of the other adjacent properties have already been granted through Resolution # 2000-51. The subject property and is zoned RSF-4 but is considered a boat dock lot which is allowed two boatlifts per the Collier County LDC. The limited amount of shoreline is the driving factor for this variance request as there is not enough area to construct a docking facility with two boatlifts without encroaching on the required riparian line setback. As proposed no setbacks are being provided which is consistent with the other docking facilities along the subject shoreline. 2. For projects authorized under LDC Section 9.04.02, provide a detailed description of site alterations, including any dredging and filling. The proposed structure will traverse through and require the removal of 415 square feet of mangroves. The project will otherwise not alter the site in any way. 3. Pursuant to LDC section 9.04.00, staff shall be guided in their recommendation to the Hearing Examiner, and the Hearing Examiner shall be guided in the determination to approve or deny a variance petition by the criteria (a-h) listed below. Please address the following criteria: a) Are there special conditions and circumstances existing which are peculiar to the location, size and characteristics of the land, structure, or building involved. Limited amount of shoreline which results in a narrow riparian area and constricting neighboring docking facilities significantly limit the direction and orientation of any potential docking facility in this location. Therefore, as a result most if not all docking facilities along the subject shoreline require a BDE and Variance in order to be compliant with the Collier County’s LDC. 9.A.5.f Packet Pg. 692 Attachment: Attachment E - Back Up Materials (12155 : Moody VA-PL20190002360) b) Are there special conditions and circumstances which do not result from the action of the applicant such as pre-existing conditions relative to the property which is the subject of the variance request. As stated above, the property’s natural shoreline and length of shoreline requires additional protrusion due to the narrow riparian lines which results in docks along this subject shoreline to require a variance from riparian setbacks in order to comply with Collier County’s LDC. c) Will a literal interpretation of the provisions of this zoning code work unnecessary and undue hardship on the applicant or create practical difficulties on the applicant. Yes. The denial of this petition request would prevent any use of the applicant’s shoreline for the purpose of mooring and storing two vessels which is allowed for every RSF-4 residential property. d) Will the variance, if granted, be the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the land, building or structure and which promote standards of health, safety or welfare. Yes. The proposed docking facility has been reduced to the minimum size and still provide safe access. Also, the proposed docking facility is consistent with the numerous other docking facilities along this shoreline that have been previously granted BDE’s and setback variances. e) Will granting the variance requested confer on the petitioner any special privilege that is denied by these zoning regulations to other lands, buildings, or structures in the same zoning district. No. Several of the neighboring lots already contain similar docking facilities that also required a BDE and setback variances. f) Will granting the variance be in harmony with the intent and purpose of this zoning code, and not be injurious to the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare. The variance is for a docking facility that will not affect the functionality of any surrounding lots but allow this property to be consistent with the others along the same subject shoreline. g) Are there natural conditions or physically induced conditions that ameliorate the goals and objectives of the regulation such as natural preserves, lakes, golf course, etc. The variance will allow the construction of a private docking facility, which will increase the recreational value of the property and the Little Hickory Shores area. h) Will granting the variance be consistent with the Growth Management Plan? Yes. Besides the dock’s side setbacks and protrusion, all other design criteria will be met. 9.A.5.f Packet Pg. 693 Attachment: Attachment E - Back Up Materials (12155 : Moody VA-PL20190002360) 9.A.5.f Packet Pg. 694 Attachment: Attachment E - Back Up Materials (12155 : Moody VA-PL20190002360) 9.A.5.f Packet Pg. 695 Attachment: Attachment E - Back Up Materials (12155 : Moody VA-PL20190002360) 9.A.5.f Packet Pg. 696 Attachment: Attachment E - Back Up Materials (12155 : Moody VA-PL20190002360) 9.A.5.f Packet Pg. 697 Attachment: Attachment E - Back Up Materials (12155 : Moody VA-PL20190002360) 9.A.5.f Packet Pg. 698 Attachment: Attachment E - Back Up Materials (12155 : Moody VA-PL20190002360) 9.A.5.f Packet Pg. 699 Attachment: Attachment E - Back Up Materials (12155 : Moody VA-PL20190002360) STATE OF FLORIDACOUNTY AERIAL VICINITY MAPSTATE OF FLORIDACOUNTY AERIAL VICINITY MAPNOTES:<> THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SUBJECTPROPERTYSUBJECTPROPERTYSUBJECTPROPERTY<> LATITUDE:N 26.326931<> LONGITUDE:W 81.831553SITE ADDRESS:<> 267 3RD ST W, LOT #8BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@turrell-associates.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\19019.00 moody - 267 3rd st\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\19019-MOODY-COUNTY-VARIANCE.dwg LOCATION 3/4/2020THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:JRRMJ09-18-1919019.00RMJ525MOODY - 267 3RD STLOCATION MAP48RMJRMJ--12-05-1902-15-2003-04-20--JRJRJR--REV. PER CONTY COMMENTSSHEET 02SHEETS 02-03--01 OF 03NESWCOLLIER COUNTYCOLLIER COUNTY)7.(1(/':+%1)7.(1(/':+%18588288641MARCOISLANDEVERGLADESCITY9329846NAPLES90908399483783784129292983983992887846951862I-758486431856850846890896KEY WESTTAMPAFT.MYERSMIAMINAPLES9.A.5.fPacket Pg. 700Attachment: Attachment E - Back Up Materials (12155 : Moody VA-PL20190002360) p:\19019.00 moody - 267 3rd st\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\19019-MOODY-COUNTY-VARIANCE.dwg 3/4/2020NESW051020SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@turrell-associates.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\19019.00 moody - 267 3rd st\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\19019-MOODY-COUNTY-VARIANCE.dwg PROPOSED AERIAL 3/4/2020THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:JRRMJ09-18-1919019.00RMJ525MOODY - 267 3RD STPROPOSED DOCK WITH DIMENSIONS48RMJRMJ--12-05-1902-15-2003-04-20--JRJRJR--ADDED NOTEREVISED LABELSADDED BULKHEAD LINE, REV LABELS--02 OF 03·SURVEY COURTESY OF:··SURVEY DATED:·THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY ANDARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.·ALL DATUM SHOWN HEREON IS REFERENCED TO MLW·APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPX LF):·EXISTING OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·WIDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW (APPX):·TIDAL DATUM:··MHW (NAVD)=··MLW (NAVD)=NOTES:·PROPOSED OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·TOTAL OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·TOTAL PROTRUSION FROM MHWL:·LOT WIDTH:PROPOSED 15'X15' LIFTRIPARIAN LINERIPARIAN LINEPROPOSED16'X16' LIFTPROPOSEDFIXED DOCK54'5'47'38'38'16'15'1.7 'MLWL = -0.5' (NAVD 1988)PROPERTY LINE &MHWL =-0.0' (NAVD 1988)ADJACENTDOCKADJACENT DOCKADJACENTPILINGSEXISTINGTOP OF BANK"DAGOSTINO & WOOD, INC."01-08-19-1.66'0.32'34.07035023723747'34.07PLATTEDBULKHEADLINE. 3 ' 1 'EDGE OF PILINGON RIPARIAN LINEEDGE OF PILINGON RIPARIAN LINE9.A.5.f Packet Pg. 701 Attachment: Attachment E - Back Up Materials (12155 : Moody VA-PL20190002360) p:\19019.00 moody - 267 3rd st\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\19019-MOODY-COUNTY-VARIANCE.dwg 3/4/2020NESW03060120SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@turrell-associates.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\19019.00 moody - 267 3rd st\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\19019-MOODY-COUNTY-VARIANCE.dwg ST OVERLAY 3/4/2020THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:JRRMJ09-18-1919019.00RMJ525MOODY - 267 3RD STST OVERLAY48----03-04-20----JR----ADDED BULKHEAD LINE----03 OF 03PROPOSEDFIXED DOCK& LIFTSST OVERLAY9.A.5.fPacket Pg. 702Attachment: Attachment E - Back Up Materials (12155 : Moody VA-PL20190002360) 9.A.5.fPacket Pg. 703Attachment: Attachment E - Back Up Materials (12155 : Moody VA-PL20190002360) 9.A.5.f Packet Pg. 704 Attachment: Attachment E - Back Up Materials (12155 : Moody VA-PL20190002360) Notification of Variance to Property Owners and Associations within 150 feet Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. 3584 Exchange Ave. Suite B Naples, FL 34104 Office: 239 643-0166 2.11.2020 Mailing Address Naples, FL Dear Property Owner: Please be advised that the sender has made a formal application to Collier County for a variance, PL20190002360, from the requirements of the zoning regulations as they apply to the following described property: Lot 8, Block G, Little Hickory Shores, Unit 3 Replat in Section 5, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida AKA: 267 3rd St West, Folio: 56000960000 It is our intent to ask the County to allow us to reduce the minimum side yard setback from the riparian line from 7.5 feet to 0 feet for a boat lift on the west side and from 7.5 feet to 0 feet for a boatlift on the east side to accommodate the proposed boat dock. If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact Jeff Rogers using the contact information listed below. Regards, Jeff Rogers Project Manager Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. Jeff@thanaples.com 9.A.5.f Packet Pg. 705 Attachment: Attachment E - Back Up Materials (12155 : Moody VA-PL20190002360) 9.A.5.fPacket Pg. 706Attachment: Attachment E - Back Up Materials (12155 : Moody VA-PL20190002360) 06/11/2020 COLLIER COUNTY Collier County Planning Commission Item Number: 9.A.6 Item Summary: PL20180001785: A Resolution of the Board of County Commissioners approving a site plan with deviations pursuant to LDC Section 10.02.03.F and seven total deviations, including one deviation from Section 4.06.02.C.4 to reduce the north buffer width; three deviations from Section 5.05.05.E.1 to reduce the landscape buffer width on the eastern property line, allow no undulated berm on the east property line and reduce the tree clustering and spacing to allow the existing trees to remain; one deviation from LDC Section 4.06.02.D.4 to allow the storage structure to remain within the south landscape buffer; and two deviations from Section 5.05.05.B.1 to reduce the setback on the no rth property line to 25.55 feet and to reduce the setback on the south property line to 16.8 feet; for redevelopment of the convenience gas station project consisting of 1.72± acres located on the west side of Santa Barbara Boulevard, approximately 420 feet north of Radio Road in Section 32, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator, C. James Sabo, AICP] Meeting Date: 06/11/2020 Prepared by: Title: Supervisor - Operations – Road Maintenance Name: Diane Lynch 05/15/2020 2:27 PM Submitted by: Title: Manager - Planning – Zoning Name: Ray Bellows 05/15/2020 2:27 PM Approved By: Review: Road Maintenance Diane Lynch Review item Skipped 05/15/2020 2:26 PM Zoning Diane Lynch Review Item Skipped 05/15/2020 2:26 PM Growth Management Operations & Regulatory Management Diane Lynch Review Item Skipped 05/15/2020 2:26 PM Growth Management Department Diane Lynch Review Item Skipped 05/15/2020 2:26 PM Zoning Diane Lynch Review Item Skipped 05/15/2020 2:26 PM Planning Commission Mark Strain Meeting Pending 06/11/2020 9:00 AM 9.A.6 Packet Pg. 707 DR-PL20180001785; 7-Eleven Mobil Gas Page 1 of 14 Revised: March 10, 2020 STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: ZONING DIVISION – ZONING SERVICES SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING DATE: MARCH 19, 2020 SUBJECT: DR PL20180001785 SITE PLAN W/ DEVIATIONS-REDEVELOPMENT 7-ELEVEN MOBIL GAS ______________________________________________________________________________ PROPERTY OWNERS/APPLICANT/AGENT: Owner/Applicant: Agent: 7-Eleven, Inc. P.O. Box 711 Dallas, TX 75221 Craig Cornelison, P.E. Cornelison Engineering 38039 Old 5th Avenue Zephyrhills, FL 33542 REQUESTED ACTION: The applicant requests that the Collier County Planning Commission consider an application for Site Plan with Deviations for Redevelopment for reconstruction project work at the 7-Eleven convenience store and gas station near the northwest corner of Santa Barbara Boulevard and Radio Road in the Berkshire Commons shopping center. There is an approved Site Development Plan (SDP-90-192) for the existing gas station and convenience store. The subject site is located within the Berkshire Lakes DRI, but the proposed project does not meet the requirements for a DRI review. The approved SDP document is included as Attachment D. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property parcel is ±1.72 acres and is zoned Commercial PUD Berkshire Lakes. The property is located in the Berkshire Commons shopping center near the Santa Barbara and Radio intersection. Section 32, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County (see location map, page 2). 9.A.6.a Packet Pg. 708 Attachment: Final Staff Report PL18-1785 7-Eleven Mobil 2.21.2020 (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) DR-PL20180001785; 7-Eleven Mobil Gas Page 2 of 14 Revised: March 10, 2020 9.A.6.aPacket Pg. 709Attachment: Final Staff Report PL18-1785 7-Eleven Mobil 2.21.2020 (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven DR-PL20180001785; 7-Eleven Mobil Gas Page 3 of 14 Revised: March 10, 2020 PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The applicant requests approval for a Site Plan with Deviations for Redevelopment for the existing 7-Eleven Mobil Gas station located at 3701 Santa Barbara Boulevard. The applicant proposes construction of a larger convenience store on the parcel. The current site was constructed on a portion of Tract F of the Berkshire Lakes PUD. The existing 7-Eleven and Mobil station are constructed entirely on Outparcel E. The applicant states that the expanded convenience store will be constructed on Outparcel E and Outparcel E-1 both are owned by the applicant. The applicant wishes to maintain the existing canopy, pump islands, and car wash building as part of the redevelopment project, which requires a Site Plan with Deviations for Redevelopment application. Additionally, the larger 7-Eleven store will be designed to meet the current LDC provisions concerning setbacks and other dimensional standards. The project is a combined approach utilizing the Site Plan with Deviations for Redevelopment application for only a portion of the project site. The Mobil station was originally approved under SDP-90-192 and constructed on Outparcel E. The applicant owns Outparcel E-1 as well, which is directly west of the existing gas station area. The plans for SDP-90-192 are included as attachment D. The project includes demolition of the existing center convenience store and construction of an updated and larger 7-Eleven store with a total of 3,058 square feet of commercial space. Most of the site will remain unchanged, including the fuel canopy, car wash structure, and drive lanes. The existing eastern ingress-egress to the Mobil station will be eliminated and a additional access points will be established to the west portion of the proposed site. Currently, the Outparcel E-1 portion of the site is striped for parking spaces and those spaces will be eliminated in favor of the expanded convenience store and alternate access points. Outparcel E-1 is owned by the applicant and is not included in the Berkshire Lakes CPUD Unit 1 for parking space calculations. Specifically, SDP-89-242 excludes Outparcel E and E-1 from the Berkshire Lakes shopping center parking calculations. As stated, the existing 7-Eleven Mobil station was developed and approved under SDP-90-192. Due to Code changes, the portion of the site the applicant wishes to maintain does not meet the current LDC provisions. The applicant’s site plan with deviations request is detailed in the deviation section below. A summary is provided here. 1. Reduction of the width of the landscape buffer from 10 feet to 8 feet along the north property line to reflect existing site conditions. 2. Reduction of the width of the landscape buffer from 25 feet to 15 feet along the east property line to reflect existing site conditions. 3. Allow for the elimination of a 3-foot undulating berm along the east property line to reflect existing site conditions. 4. Allow for elimination of tree clusters and spacing not exceeding 25 feet and allow existing linear trees with clusters between existing trees. 5. Allow for the existing storage area structure to be located within the required south landscape buffer to reflect existing site conditions. 9.A.6.a Packet Pg. 710 Attachment: Final Staff Report PL18-1785 7-Eleven Mobil 2.21.2020 (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) DR-PL20180001785; 7-Eleven Mobil Gas Page 4 of 14 Revised: March 10, 2020 6. Reduction of the side yard setback along the north property line from 40 feet to 25.55 feet for the existing canopy structure. 7. Reduction of the side yard setback along the south property line from 40 feet to 16.8 feet for the existing car wash structure. The Site Plan with Deviations request has a companion item for a Site Development Plan approval, which is SDP PL20180001683 for the larger convenience store and to retain the existing canopy, car wash and pump islands. The SDP plans have been included as Attachment F. SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: North: Commercial bank branch, zoned Berkshire Lakes PUD South: Commercial bank branch, zoned Berkshire Lakes PUD East: Residential single-family, zoned Berkshire Lakes PUD West: Commercial shopping center, zoned Berkshire Lakes PUD Aerial Map (County GIS) 9.A.6.a Packet Pg. 711 Attachment: Final Staff Report PL18-1785 7-Eleven Mobil 2.21.2020 (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) DR-PL20180001785; 7-Eleven Mobil Gas Page 5 of 14 Revised: March 10, 2020 APPLICANT’S JUSTIFICATION FOR THE REQUESTED DEVIATIONS: The petitioner is seeking seven (7) deviations from the requirements of the Land Development Code (LDC). The requested deviations are listed here with the staff analysis and recommendation. Deviation #1: Buffer Requirements Deviation #1 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.06.02.C.4, Buffer Requirements, which requires a 10' type 'D' buffer to instead allow a minimum of an 8’ landscape buffer along the north property line. Petitioner’s Justification: The 7-Eleven project site was developed under Collier County Ordinance 82-2, Section 8.30.e(2), which required a 5’ landscape buffer along the property lines and Section 8.37.a, which required a 10’ landscape buffer. The original approval documentation is SDP-90-192. The SDP documents show that the landscape plan was approved with a 6-foot-wide landscape buffer along the property lines. The applicant’s justification is that changes in the LDC over time and the previous SDP approvals would allow them to adjust/update the proposed buffer landscaping in its previously approved location along the north property line under the new deviation requested. The 7-Eleven #34816 project includes demolishing an existing Mobile gas station building and reconstruction of a new 3,058 sf 7-Eleven convenience store. The majority of the site including the existing canopy, car wash, parking, and drive aisles will remain. The project was approved for a building permit and site development plan on October 20, 1990 under SDP #90-192. A copy of the approved site development plan is included with this submittal. At the time of the original construction, a 5’ landscape buffer was required adjacent to rights of ways and interior property lines. The provided buffer width will vary from a minimum of 8’ to in excess of the required 10’, per the current code. To provide vehicular access around the existing canopy, the buffer cannot feasibly be increased beyond what currently exists. The proposed buffer will provide a minimum of 8’ type ’D’ buffer with 10’ height x 4’ spread trees spaced no more than 30 feet on center and a continuous 3 gallon double row hedge spaced 3’ on center of at least 24" in height at the time of planting and attaining a minimum of 30 inches in height in one year. By eliminating existing pavement, additional buffering/open space will be created along the northern property line. With the exception of the existing encroachment into the required buffer, the requirements of the LDC are met within the proposed buffer. There are no anticipated negative impacts as a result of granting this request to allow a minimum of an 8’ landscape buffer along the north property line. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Given that the applicant is proposing a buffer along the North that exceeded minimum width requirements at the time of original permitting and is committing to provide the buffer plantings required by current code, staff recommends APPROVAL of this deviation. 9.A.6.a Packet Pg. 712 Attachment: Final Staff Report PL18-1785 7-Eleven Mobil 2.21.2020 (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) DR-PL20180001785; 7-Eleven Mobil Gas Page 6 of 14 Revised: March 10, 2020 Deviation #2: Right of Way Buffer Landscaping Deviation #2 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.05.05.E.1.a, Right of Way Buffer Landscaping, which requires landscaping adjacent to right of way external to the development project shall be located within a landscape buffer easement which is a minimum of twenty-five (25) feet in width to instead allow a 15’ landscape buffer along the eastern property line. Petitioner’s Justification: The 7-Eleven project site was developed under Collier County Ordinance 82-2, Section 8.30.e(1), which required a minimum 5’ buffer along the right-of-way. The original approval documentation is SDP-90-192. The SDP documents show that the landscape plan was approved with a 14.5-foot wide landscape buffer along the right-of-way. The applicant’s justification is that changes in the LDC over time and the previous SDP approvals would allow them to adjust/update the proposed right-of-way buffer landscaping in its previously approved location under the new deviation requested. As stated in Justification 1 above, the 7 -Eleven #34816 project includes demolishing an existing Mobile gas station building and reconstruction of a new 3,058 sf 7-Eleven convenience store. The majority of the site including the existing canopy, car wash, parking, and drive aisles will remain. The project was approved for a building permit and site development plan on October 20, 1990 under SDP #90-192. A copy of the approved plans is included with this submittal. At the time of the original construction, a 5’ landscape buffer was required adjacent to rights of ways and interior property lines. The existing landscape buffer is 15’ wide. To provide vehicular and gas tanker access around the existing canopy, the buffer cannot feasibly be increased beyond what currently exists. The proposed plan includes a 15' wide buffer instead of the 25' buffer. There are no anticipated negative impacts as a result of this granting this request to allow a 15’ landscape buffer along the eastern property line. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Staff sees no detrimental effect if this deviation request is approved. Given the existing site constraints and supplemental planting proposed, staff recommends APPROVAL of this deviation. Deviation #3: Right of Way Buffer Landscaping Deviation #3 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.05.05.E.1.b, Right of Way Buffer Landscaping, which requires an undulating berm with a maximum slope of 3:1 shall be constructed and maintained at a minimum average height of three (3) feet to instead allow no undulating berm along the eastern property line. Petitioner’s Justification: The 7-Eleven project site was developed under Collier County Ordinance 82-2, Section 8.30.e(1), which required a hedge at least 3’ high along the right-of-way. The original approval documentation is SDP-90-192. The SDP documents show that the landscape plan was approved with a 3-foot-high hedge. The applicant’s justification is that changes in the LDC over time and 9.A.6.a Packet Pg. 713 Attachment: Final Staff Report PL18-1785 7-Eleven Mobil 2.21.2020 (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) DR-PL20180001785; 7-Eleven Mobil Gas Page 7 of 14 Revised: March 10, 2020 the previous SDP approvals would allow them to adjust/update the proposed right-of-way buffer landscaping in its previously approved location under the new deviation requested. As stated in Justification 1 above, the 7 -Eleven #34816 project includes demolishing an existing Mobile gas station building and reconstruction of a new 3,058 sf 7-Eleven convenience store. The majority of the site including the existing canopy, car wash, parking, and drive aisles will remain. The project was approved for a building permit and site development plan on October 20, 1990 under SDP #90-192. A copy of the approved plans is included with this submittal. At the time of the original construction, an undulating berm was not required. Adding fill material over the root system of established trees to create the undulating berm would not be advisable and may cause harm to the existing, otherwise healthy trees. Given the size and health of the existing trees, a dense vegetative buffer already exists adjacent to the road right of way. The proposed plan includes a 15' wide buffer with 14' height x 6' spread canopy trees clustered in double rows with a minimum of three trees per cluster at a maximum spacing of 20' on center. 50% of the buffer length will contain 15-gallon shrubs at 5' height x 4' spread and 50% of the length of the buffer will contain 25-gallon shrubs at 6’ height x 5’ spread and the remainder of the buffer will be a combination of ornamental grasses and ground cover. As stated earlier, the six existing oaks and three existing palms in the buffer will be preserved. Preserving the existing trees is a benefit to the project. The required buffer plant material will be met and/or exceeded within the proposed buffer. There are no anticipated negative impacts as a result of this granting this request to allow no undulating berm along the eastern property line. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Staff sees no detrimental effect if this deviation request is approved. The installation of the code required berm would likely result in the decline of the existing trees. In an effort to preserve the existing buffer trees which exceed the code minimum size requirements, staff recommends APPROVAL of this deviation. Deviation #4: Right of Way Buffer Landscaping Deviation #4 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.05.05.E.1.c, Right of Way Buffer Landscaping, which requires clusters of trees with spacing of trees in each cluster not exceeding 20' and spacing between clusters not exceeding 25’ to instead allow existing trees to remain in a linear layout with clusters of new trees provided between existing trees. Petitioner’s Justification: The 7-Eleven project site was developed under Collier County Ordinance 82-2, Section 8.30.e(1), which required 1 tree for each 50 linear feet along the right- of-way. The original approval documentation is SDP-90-192. The SDP documents show that the landscape plan was approved with 6 trees per 50 linear feet. The applicant’s justification is that changes in the LDC over time and the previous SDP approvals would allow them to adjust/update the proposed right-of-way buffer landscaping in its previously approved location under the new deviation requested. As stated in Justification 1 above, the 7 -Eleven #34816 project includes demolishing an existing Mobile gas station building and reconstruction of a new 3,058 sf 7-Eleven convenience store. The majority of the site including the existing canopy, car wash, parking, and drive aisles will remain. 9.A.6.a Packet Pg. 714 Attachment: Final Staff Report PL18-1785 7-Eleven Mobil 2.21.2020 (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) DR-PL20180001785; 7-Eleven Mobil Gas Page 8 of 14 Revised: March 10, 2020 The project was approved for a building permit and site development plan on October 20, 1990 under SDP #90-192. A copy of the approved plans is included with this submittal. At the time of the original construction, a 5’ landscape buffer was required adjacent to rights of ways and interior property lines and the undulating berm was not required. The existing landscape buffer is 15’ wide containing 6 existing oak trees and three existing palm trees. Given the size and health of the existing trees, a dense vegetative buffer already exists adjacent to the road right of way. The proposed plan includes 14' height x 6' spread canopy trees clustered in double rows with a minimum of three trees per cluster at a maximum spacing of 20' on center. 50% of the buffer length will contain 15-gallon shrubs at 5' height x 4' spread and 50% of the length of the buffer will contain 25-gallon shrubs at 6’ height x 5’ spread and the remainder of the buffer will be a combination of ornamental grasses and ground cover. As stated earlier, the six existing oaks and three existing palms in the buffer will be preserved. Preserving the existing trees is a benefit to the project. There are no anticipated negative impacts as a result of this granting this request to allow the existing trees to remain along the eastern property line. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Staff sees no detrimental effect if this deviation request is approved. A portion of the proposed hedge will be comprised of shrubs that are 6’ high at installation which exceeds the current code minimum requirement of 5’ high. Staff recommends APPROVAL of this deviation. Deviation #5: Sidewalks and Other Impervious Areas Must Not Occupy a Required Buffer Deviation #5 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.06.02.D.4, Sidewalks and Other Impervious Areas Must Not Occupy Any Part of a Required Buffer, which requires sidewalks and other impervious areas must not occupy any part of a required alternative A, B, C, or D type buffer to instead allow the existing storage area structure to be located within the required south landscape buffer. Petitioner’s Justification: The 7-Eleven project site was developed under Collier County Ordinance 82-2, Section 9.8.a(13), which required a minimum of 20% of the lot area to be landscaped, and a minimum of 3% of landscaping for each lot side. The original approval documentation is SDP-90-192. The SDP documents show that the plans were approved with the covered storage area adjacent to the trash enclosure in its existing location within the south landscape buffer. The applicant’s justification is that changes in the LDC over time and the previous SDP approvals would allow them to keep the existing storage area in its previously approved location under the new deviation requested. Furthermore, the existing storage area does not impact the 3% of required landscaping for the south side. As stated above, the 7-Eleven #34816 project includes demolishing an existing Mobile gas station building and reconstruction of a new 3,058 sf 7-Eleven convenience store. The majority of the site including the existing canopy, car wash, parking, and drive aisles will remain. The project was approved for a building permit and site development plan on October 20, 1990 under SDP #90- 192. A copy of the approved plans is included with this submittal. At the time of the original construction, a 5’ landscape buffer was required adjacent to rights of ways and interior property lines. The existing south buffer is 15' wide but contains an existing storage area structure and transformers within the buffer area. The storage area houses the mechanical equipment for the existing car wash and is screened by an opaque fence. The adjacent dumpster enclosure will be 9.A.6.a Packet Pg. 715 Attachment: Final Staff Report PL18-1785 7-Eleven Mobil 2.21.2020 (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) DR-PL20180001785; 7-Eleven Mobil Gas Page 9 of 14 Revised: March 10, 2020 relocated out of the landscape buffer. The electrical transformers serve the site and off -site uses and are located within existing electrical easements. With the exception of the car wash mechanical and electrical transformers, the buffer meets and/or exceeds the 15’ buffer requirement per the current code. The proposed plan includes preserving eight existing canopy trees and three existing palms within the southern buffer. In addition to the existing trees a continuous hedge of 15 gallon – 5' height shrubs will be added to the buffer. The existing equipment has been in place for approximately 30 years and relocating the equipment is not feasible, however, the adjacent dumpster will be relocated. With the exception of the existing equipment in the required buffer and electrical transformers, the requirements of the LDC are met as proposed. Additionally, preserving the existing trees is a benefit to the project. There are no anticipated negative impacts as a result of this request to allow the existing impervious area to be located within the required landscape buffer. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Given the preservation of the existing buffer trees and the addition of other plantings to meet current buffer planting requirements, staff sees no detrimental effect if this deviation request is approved. Staff recommends APPROVAL of this deviation. Deviation #6: 40’ Side Yard Setback along North Property Line Deviation #6 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.05.05.B.1, 40’ Side Yard Setback along North Property Line, which requires site design requirements, Table 1, minimum setbacks, all structures: side yard (ft.) = 40’ (site standards), to instead allow a 25.55’± setback along the northern property line. Petitioner’s Justification: The 7-Eleven project site was developed under Collier County Ordinance 82-2, Section 9.8.a(2), which required setbacks to be: front = 50’, side = 40’, rear = 40’, and canopy = 10’ beyond pump setback line. The original approval documentation is SDP- 90-192. The SDP documents show the site was approved for: building = 25’ front and rear setbacks and 5’ side setback; carwash = 25’ front, 5’ side, and no rear setback per Section 9.8, Zoning Ordinance. The applicant’s justification is that changes in the LDC over time and the previous SDP approvals would allow them to keep the existing canopy in its present location under the new deviation requested. As stated above, the 7-Eleven #34816 project includes demolishing an existing Mobile gas station building and reconstruction of a new 3,058 sf 7-Eleven convenience store. The majority of the site including the existing canopy, car wash, parking, and drive aisles will remain. The project was approved for a building permit and site development plan on October 20, 1990 under SDP #90- 192. A copy of the approved plans is included with this submittal. At the time of the original construction, a 25’ building setback was required along the northern property line. The existing canopy (to remain) was constructed approximately 25.5’ from the property line. The existing fuel canopy has been on the site for nearly 30 years and will remain in place. The canopy met code requirements when permitted through the County and constructed. While most of the canopy meets the current minimum 40’ side yard setback requirement, the northern portion does not. This area consists of the overhead canopy structure only; there are no fuel pumps, equipment, or columns within this area. 9.A.6.a Packet Pg. 716 Attachment: Final Staff Report PL18-1785 7-Eleven Mobil 2.21.2020 (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) DR-PL20180001785; 7-Eleven Mobil Gas Page 10 of 14 Revised: March 10, 2020 The existing canopy has been in place for approximately 30 years. With the exception of the northern 270 sf (5.4% of the overall structure), the existing canopy is located outside of the required 40’ setback. There are no anticipated negative impacts as a result of this request to allow a 22.5’± setback along the northern property line. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Staff sees no detrimental effect if this deviation request is approved. Staff recommends APPROVAL of this deviation as the applicant seeks to retain existing site conditions that were approved in 1990. Deviation #7: 40’ Side Yard Setback along South Property Line Deviation #7 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.05.05.B.1, 40’ Side Yard Setback along South Property Line, which requires site design requirements, Table 1, minimum setbacks, all structures: side yard (ft.) = 40’ (site standards), to instead allow a 16.8’± setback along the southern property line. Petitioner’s Justification: The 7-Eleven project site was developed under Collier County Ordinance 82-2, Section 9.8.a(2), which required setbacks to be: front = 50’, side = 40’, rear = 40’, and canopy = 10’ beyond pump setback line. The original approval documentation is SDP- 90-192. The SDP documents show the site was approved for: building = 25’ front and rear setbacks and 5’ side setback; carwash = 25’ front, 5’ side, and no rear setback per Section 9.8, Zoning Ordinance. The applicant’s justification is that changes in the LDC over time and the previous SDP approvals would allow them to keep the existing canopy in its present location under the new deviation requested. As stated above, the 7-Eleven #34816 project includes demolishing an existing Mobile gas station building and reconstruction of a new 3,058 sf 7-Eleven convenience store. The majority of the site including the existing canopy, car wash, parking, and drive aisles will remain. The project was approved for a building permit and site development plan on October 20, 1990 under SDP #90- 192. A copy of the approved plans is included with this submittal. At the time of the original construction, a 5’ building setback was required along the southern property line for the car wash. The existing car wash (to remain) was constructed approximately 16.8’ from the property line. The existing car wash has been on the site for nearly 30 years and will remain in place. The car wash met code requirements when permitted through the County and constructed. While the car wash building does not meet the current minimum side yard setback requirement, the existing buffer width is adequate to screen the interior project area from the adjacent property to the south. There are eight existing canopy trees and three existing palm trees located between the building and the adjacent roadway. All of the aforementioned trees are proposed to be retained. Additionally, a continuous hedge will be added; trees will also be added as needed so that the maximum 25' spacing between the buffer trees is not exceeded and to meet the ‘B’ buffer tree spacing requirement. There are no anticipated negative impacts as a result of this request to allow a 16.8’± setback along the southern property line. 9.A.6.a Packet Pg. 717 Attachment: Final Staff Report PL18-1785 7-Eleven Mobil 2.21.2020 (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) DR-PL20180001785; 7-Eleven Mobil Gas Page 11 of 14 Revised: March 10, 2020 In conclusion, this redevelopment project falls within the applicability requirements for deviations per LDC, Chapter 5, Section 5.05.08.G.4.a.v, which states “Any other non-commercial building, or use, that is not listed under LDC Section 5.05.08 E. design standards for specific building types of this section, and due to its function, has specific requirements making meeting LDC Section 5.05.08 standards unfeasible.” AND LDC, Chapter 5, Section 5.05.08.G.4.a.vi, which states “Buildings located on property with a commercial zoning designation when submitted for Site Development Plan review…….” Furthermore, the project meets the standards for approval per LDC, Chapter 10, Section 10.02.03.F.7, which states “Standards for approval. The petition shall be reviewed for consistency with the following standards: a. Land uses and densities within the development shall be consistent with the permitted and approved conditional uses in the zoning district; b. The proposed development is consistent with the Growth Management Plan; c. The development shall have a beneficial effect both upon the area in which it is proposed to be established and upon the unincorporated area as a whole. d. The total land area within the development and the area devoted to each functional portion of the development shall be adequate to serve its intended purpose; e. Streets, utilities, drainage facilities, recreation areas, sizes and yards, architectural features, vehicular parking and loading facilities, sign distances, landscaping and buffers shall be appropriate for the particular use involved; f. Visual character of the project shall be equal or better in quality than that required by the development standards for the zoning district. The visual character of the project shall be better in quality than the existing project before redevelopment and after it was first permitted; g. Areas proposed for common ownership shall be subject to a reliable and continuing maintenance guarantee; h. Deviations shall be clearly delineated in the petition and shall be the minimum required to achieve the goals of the project and comply with these standards; i. The petitioner has provided enhancements to the development; and j. Approval of the deviation will not have an adverse effect on adjacent properties.” Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Staff sees no detrimental effect if this deviation request is approved. Staff recommends APPROVAL of this deviation as the applicant seeks to retain existing site conditions that were approved in 1990. STAFF ANALYSIS: Staff has reviewed the requested application against the established criteria for Site Plans with Deviations under LDC Section 10.02.03.F.7 and provides the analysis listed here. a. Land uses and densities within the development shall be consistent with the permitted and approved conditional uses in the zoning district. Staff has described the existing land use pattern in the “Surrounding Land Use and Zoning” portion of this report. The proposed deviations will not change the permitted land uses and densities within the development area. The deviations seek to retain the existing conditions for buffer landscaping, canopy setback, car wash setback , and buffer planting configuration. b. The proposed development is consistent with the Growth Management Plan. 9.A.6.a Packet Pg. 718 Attachment: Final Staff Report PL18-1785 7-Eleven Mobil 2.21.2020 (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) DR-PL20180001785; 7-Eleven Mobil Gas Page 12 of 14 Revised: March 10, 2020 Staff finds that the project as proposed will remain consistent with GMP FLUE Policy 5.4 requiring the project to be compatible with neighborhood development. Staff recommends that this petition be deemed consistent with the FLUE of the GMP. The petition is also consistent with the CCME. Therefore, staff recommends that this petition be deemed consistent with the GMP, because there are no use changes related to the existing site conditions with this request. The site will remain a gas station and convenience store. c. The development shall have a beneficial effect both upon the area in which it is proposed to be established and upon the unincorporated area as a whole. The proposed deviations will not change the permitted land uses and densities within the development area. Staff finds that the proposed improvement will have beneficial effect for the surrounding neighborhood and upon the unincorporated area of Collier County as the gas station and convenience store services will remain in the neighborhood. d. The total land area within the development and the area devoted to each functional portion of the development shall be adequate to serve its intended purpose The proposed deviations will not change the current land area within the development and the area devoted to each functional portion is adequate to serve the purpose. e. Streets, utilities, drainage facilities, recreation areas, sizes and yards, architectural features, vehicular parking and loading facilities, sight distances, landscaping and buffers shall be appropriate for the particular use involved. The proposed project is to redevelop the site and enlarge the convenience store, maintain the existing pump canopy, and maintain current landscaping buffers. Except for a larger convenience store, the site will function the same. Staff finds that the proposed deviations will meet the purpose and intent of the LDC regulations. f. Visual character of the project shall be equal or better in quality than that required by the development standards for the zoning district. The visual character of the project shall be better in quality than the existing project before redevelopment and after it was first permitted. The proposed project is to demolish the existing convenience store portion of the site and reconstruct a larger convenience store with more parking spaces. The visual character of the project site will be better in quality than the existing project site. g. Areas proposed for common ownership shall be subject to a reliable and continuing maintenance guarantee. 9.A.6.a Packet Pg. 719 Attachment: Final Staff Report PL18-1785 7-Eleven Mobil 2.21.2020 (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) DR-PL20180001785; 7-Eleven Mobil Gas Page 13 of 14 Revised: March 10, 2020 At the time of the Site Development Plan and Building Permit processing, the proposed development improvement is subject to reliable and continuing maintenance requirements as well as standard confirmation and authorization of common ownership. h. Deviations shall be clearly delineated in the petition and shall be the minimum required to achieve the goals of the project and comply with these standards. Staff finds that the deviations are clearly delineated and are the minimum required to achieve the goals of the gas station redevelopment project. i. The petitioner has provided enhancements to the development. The petitioner has proposed a new construction building that meets the Collier County architectural review standards and proposes to relocate to north entry access to a more appropriate location. The petitioner has provided enhancements to the development. j. Approval of the deviation(s) will not have an adverse effect on adjacent properties. Staff has described the existing land use pattern in the “Surrounding Land Use and Zoning” portion of this report. Further, based on the information provided in the application the proposed deviations are requested to maintain existing conditions at the site. The project will not adversely affect adjacent properties. Landscape Review: The Landscape Review Division provided their review is the Deviations section of the report. Environmental Review: Environmental Planning staff has reviewed this petition. Preservation of native vegetation is not required since the property has been developed and does not contain native vegetation or listed species. This project does not require Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) review, as this project did not meet the EAC scope of land development project reviews as identified in Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Codes of Laws and Ordinances. CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT (CCME): Environmental review staff has found this project to be consistent with the Conservation & Coastal Management Element (CCME). The project site is not required to set aside a preserve area. COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The County Attorney’s Office reviewed this staff report on 3/10/2020. RECOMMENDATION: Zoning Division staff recommends the Collier County Planning Commission forward a recommendation of approval to the Board of County Commissioners for petition DR- PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas Station. 9.A.6.a Packet Pg. 720 Attachment: Final Staff Report PL18-1785 7-Eleven Mobil 2.21.2020 (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) DR-PL20180001785; 7-Eleven Mobil Gas Page 14 of 14 Revised: March 10, 2020 Attachments: A) Deviations Site Plan B) Proposed 7-Eleven Site Plan C) Landscape Plan D) Approved SDP 90-192 E) SDP application PL2018-1683 F) Backup Material 9.A.6.a Packet Pg. 721 Attachment: Final Staff Report PL18-1785 7-Eleven Mobil 2.21.2020 (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) PREPARED BY: C.J CP. PzuNCIPAL PLANNI]R 7,ISION _ ZONING SERVICES SECTION REVIEWED BY: RAYM . BELLOWS, ZONING MANAGER ZONING ION ZONING SERVICES SECTION APPROVED BY: S FRENCH. DEPUTY DEPARTMENT HEADAME 9' ?,' 72Zp DATE DAI'F] 3 z-' ?-oLe DATE 3 - /a -2aaa GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT DR-PL2018000'1785; 7-Eleven l\4obil Gas Site Plan Deviations 1 9.A.6.a Packet Pg. 722 Attachment: Final Staff Report PL18-1785 7-Eleven Mobil 2.21.2020 (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.b Packet Pg. 723 Attachment: Resolution - 030320 (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.b Packet Pg. 724 Attachment: Resolution - 030320 (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.b Packet Pg. 725 Attachment: Resolution - 030320 (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.b Packet Pg. 726 Attachment: Resolution - 030320 (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.b Packet Pg. 727 Attachment: Resolution - 030320 (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.b Packet Pg. 728 Attachment: Resolution - 030320 (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.b Packet Pg. 729 Attachment: Resolution - 030320 (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.b Packet Pg. 730 Attachment: Resolution - 030320 (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.b Packet Pg. 731 Attachment: Resolution - 030320 (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 1 6 DEVIATION KEY SHEET DR PL #20180001785 7 5 2 4 3 9.A.6.c Packet Pg. 732 Attachment: Attachment A Deviations Site Plan (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) FFFRLOADING ZONESANTA BARBARA BLVD SITE PLANC05CALL 48 HOURSBEFORE YOU DIGIT'S THE LAW!DIAL 811SUNSHINE STATE ONE CALL OF FLORIDA, INC.Know what's below.Call before you dig.REVISED PER COUNTY COMMENTS.3 This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Cornelison Engineering & Design, Inc.(CED) shall be without liability to CED. Drawing name: P:\1509044 - 7-11, Santa Barbara Blvd, Naples\Cadd\Exhibits\8.5x11 - 7-11 NAPLES - SITE PLAN.dwg C05 Jul 21, 2019 2:27pm by: CraigCornelison REVISIONSNo.DATE SHEET NUMBERPROJECT NO.DATEDRAWN BY SCALE CHECKED BY DESIGNED BY AS NOTED PROJECT NAME CLIENTSHEET NAME ã FLORIDA PE NO: 3701 SANTA BARBARA BLVD., NAPLES, FL 34104 55433 CRAIG L. CORNELISON, P.E.09/27/181509044CLC ERV CLC VERTICAL CONSTR. MANAGEMENT 7-ELEVEN - NAPLES (SDP PL20180001683) 07/10/20197-21-19 NTS9.A.6.dPacket Pg. 733Attachment: Attachment B Proposed 7-Eleven Mobil Site Plan (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil 9.A.6.e Packet Pg. 734 Attachment: Attachment C Landscape Plan (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.f Packet Pg. 735 Attachment: Attachment D Approved SDP-90-192 (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.f Packet Pg. 736 Attachment: Attachment D Approved SDP-90-192 (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.f Packet Pg. 737 Attachment: Attachment D Approved SDP-90-192 (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.f Packet Pg. 738 Attachment: Attachment D Approved SDP-90-192 (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.f Packet Pg. 739 Attachment: Attachment D Approved SDP-90-192 (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.f Packet Pg. 740 Attachment: Attachment D Approved SDP-90-192 (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.f Packet Pg. 741 Attachment: Attachment D Approved SDP-90-192 (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.f Packet Pg. 742 Attachment: Attachment D Approved SDP-90-192 (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.f Packet Pg. 743 Attachment: Attachment D Approved SDP-90-192 (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.f Packet Pg. 744 Attachment: Attachment D Approved SDP-90-192 (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 7-ELEVEN - 3701 SANTA BARBARA BLVD., NAPLES, FL 34104 CED PROJECT# 1509044 This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Cornelison Engineering & Design, Inc. shall be without liability to Cornelison Engineering & Design, Inc. Drawing name: P:\1509044 - 7-11, Santa Barbara Blvd, Naples\Cadd\Construction\C01 - 7-11 NAPLES - COVER.dwg C01 Jul 24, 2019 4:48pmBATES FORUMCONTACT: WILNER DUBON502 SW A STREET, SUITE 2BENTONVILLE, AR 72712PHONE: (479) 633-9546EMAIL: dubonw@batesforum.comREVISIONSPROJECT TEAMDEVELOPER:LAND OWNER:LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT:LOCATION MAPAERIALUTILITY PROVIDERSWATER:7-ELEVEN, INC.CONTACT: JOSH TAYLOR1209 S. WHITE CHAPEL BLVD., STE 180SOUTHLAKE, TX 76092PHONE: (817) 912-5572EMAIL: jtaylor@verdad.comPREPARED BYN.T.SSEWER:POWER:PHONE:CENTURYLINKCONTACT: SHELLEY BOYCE3530 KRAFT ROAD, UNIT 100NAPLES, FL 34105PHONE: (239) 263-6234EMAIL: shelley.l.boyce@centurylink.comARCHITECT:SURVEYOR:ã·LEGAL DESCRIPTION:(AS PROVIDED BY SURVEYOR):CIVIL ENGINEER:CORNELISON ENGINEERING & DESIGN, INC.CONTACT: CRAIG L. CORNELISON, P.E.38039 OLD 5TH AVENUEZEPHYRHILLS, FL 33542PHONE: (813) 788-7835EMAIL: craig@cornelison-eng.com0SCALE (IN FEET)SECTION 32 - TOWNSHIP 49S - RANGE 26E“”“”“” “”“” ’“” “” “” SHEET INDEXC01C02C03C04C05C06C07C08C09C10C11C12C13SL1L-1L-2L-3COVER SHEETGENERAL NOTESEXISTING CONDITIONS/DEMO PLANAERIAL OVERLAYSITE PLANPAVING, GRADING, AND DRAINAGE PLANUTILITY PLANEROSION CONTROL PLANEROSION CONTROL DETAILSCONSTRUCTION DETAILSCONSTRUCTION DETAILSUTILITY DETAILSSANITARY SEWER PLAN AND PROFILESITE LIGHTING PLANTREE PRESERVATION PLANLANDSCAPE PLANIRRIGATION PLANSHEETNO.SHEETSREVISEDSHEET DESCRIPTIONCOLLIER COUNTY PUBLIC UTILITIESCONTACT: BRYAN FEIR3339 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL, STE 303NAPLES, FL 34112PHONE: (239) 252-5381EMAIL: bryan.feir@colliercountyfl.govCOLLIER COUNTY PUBLIC UTILITIESCONTACT: BRYAN FEIR3339 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL, STE 303NAPLES, FL 34112PHONE: (239) 252-5381EMAIL: bryan.feir@colliercountyfl.govFLORIDA POWER & LIGHTCONTACT: JOHN BENAVIDES4105 15TH AVENUE SWNAPLES, FL 34116PHONE: (239) 353-6003EMAIL: john.benavides@fpl.com7-ELEVEN, INC.c/o RYAN, LLCTHREE GALLERIA TOWER13155 NOEL ROADSUITE 100 LB73DALLAS, TX 75240CPH, INC.CONTACT: PAUL J. KATREK500W. FULTON STREETSANFORD, FL 32771PHONE: (407) 322-6841EMAIL: pkatrek@cphcorp.comANDERSON LESNIAK LIMITED, INC.CONTACT: ALYSON UTTER, RLA, ASLA, ISA4921 S. WESTSHORE BLVD.TAMPA, FL 33611PHONE: (813) 831-9595EMAIL: anderson.lesniak@tampabay.rr.com7-ELEVENSITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN PL20180001683FORNAPLES, FLORIDA 34104PARCEL I.D. NUMBER: 239450070353701 SANTA BARBARA BOULEVARDCOLLIER COUNTY102/11/2019 REVISED PER COUNTY COMMENTS.213113232323222304/23/2019 REVISED PER COUNTY COMMENTS.07/10/2019 REVISED PER COUNTY COMMENTS.7-24-19PROJECTLOCATIONPROJECTLOCATIONPROJECT LOCATIONCOLLIER COUNTYR7-24-19CRAIG L. CORNELISON, P.E.FL PE# 55433C RA I G LEE CORNELISONFLORIDAPROFESSIONAL ENGI N E ER No. 55433L I CENSESTATE OFKnow what'sbelow.Callbefore you dig.CALL 48 HOURSBEFORE YOU DIGIT'S THE LAW!DIAL 811SUNSHINE STATE ONE CALL OF FLORIDA, INC.COLLIER COUNTY PROJECT HISTORYTYPENUMBERDATESTATUSZONING (BERKSHIRE LAKES PUD)10-28-2008APPROVEDRES 08-317AREQUESTORD # 83-46NOTE: THE APPROVAL OF THESE CONSTRUCTION PLANS DOES NOT AUTHORIZE CONSTRUCTION OFREQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS WHICH ARE INCONSISTENT WITH EASEMENT OF RECORD.TYPE OF BUILDING CONSTRUCTION:TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE UNDER ROOF:AIR CONDITIONED:NON-AIR CONDITIONED:7-ELEVEN (UNDER ROOF):AIR CONDITIONED:NON-AIR CONDITIONED:CAR WASH AREA (UNDER ROOF):AIR CONDITIONED:NON-AIR CONDITIONED:GAS CANOPY (UNDER ROOF):AIR CONDITIONED:NON-AIR CONDITIONED:2 ADDITIONAL FUEL PUMPS WILL BE INSTALLED(EQUIVALENT TO 4 ADDITIONAL REFUELING POSITIONS)NO FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM IS PROPOSEDANY WORK WITHIN RIGHT OF WAY WILLREQUIRE A ROW PERMITTYPE VB (UNPROTECTED)3,926 SQ.FT2,825 SQ.FT.1,101 SQ.FT.3,058 SQ.FT.2,825 SQ.FT. 233 SQ.FT. 868 SQ.FT. (EXISTING) 0 SQ.FT. 868 SQ.FT.4,952 SQ.FT. (EXISTING) 0 SQ.FT.4,952 SQ.FT.PLAT (TRACT F BERKSHIRE LAKES UNIT ONE)RECORDEDRES 95-199REPLATDEVIATION REQUESTPENDINGPL20180001785DR303-16-1995--SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANPENDINGPL20180001683SDP--11111111112222323123This item has been digitally signed and sealed by Craig L.Cornelison, PE. On 07/24/2019.Printed copies of this document are not considered signed andsignature must be verified on any electronic copies.9.A.6.gPacket Pg. 745Attachment: Attachment E SDP application PL2018-1683 (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) GENERAL NOTESC02 GENERAL GENERAL NOTES BURNING DISTURBED AREAS GRADING STAKING STABILIZING ROCK BASE PRIME AND TACK COAT ASPHALTIC CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE (ACSC) SIGNING AND PAVEMENT MARKING PAVEMENT TESTING SHOP DRAWING SUBMITTALS DRAINAGE SPECIFICATIONS CONCRETE PRECAST INLETS CULVERT PIPES CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION RECORD DRAWINGS CLEAN-UP EROSION CONTROL NOTES Know what'sbelow. Callbefore you dig. CALL 48 HOURS BEFORE YOU DIG IT'S THE LAW! DIAL 811 SUNSHINE STATE ONE CALL OF FLORIDA, INC.This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Cornelison Engineering & Design, Inc.(CED) shall be without liability to CED. Drawing name: P:\1509044 - 7-11, Santa Barbara Blvd, Naples\Cadd\Construction\C02 - 7-11 NAPLES - GEN NOTE.dwg C02 May 21, 2019 11:14am by: GeraldHarrisonREVISIONSNo.DATESHEET NUMBER PROJECT NO. DATE DRAWN BYSCALECHECKED BYDESIGNED BYAS NOTEDPROJECT NAMECLIENTSHEET NAMEãFLORIDA PE NO: 3701 SANTA BARBARA BLVD., NAPLES, FL 3410455433CRAIG L. CORNELISON, P.E.09/27/18 1509044 CLCERVCLCVERTICAL CONSTR. MANAGEMENT7-ELEVEN - NAPLES (SDP PL20180001683)CRAIG LEE CORNELIS O N FLORIDAP R O FESSIONAL ENGINEERNo. 55433LICENSESTATE OF5-21-19· · · 9.A.6.g Packet Pg. 746 Attachment: Attachment E SDP application PL2018-1683 (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) S 00°07'01" E 240.00'S 89°52'59" W 266.47'C1N 00°07'01" W 250.00'C2N 89°52'59" E 39.54'C3S 66°26'21" E 147.32'N 89°52'59" E 58.00'SANTA BARBARA BLVD FIRE LANENO PARKINGSUBJECT PARCELSITE BENCHMARK #3SITE BENCHMARK #2SITE BENCHMARK #1XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXEXISTING CONDITIONS/ DEMO PLANC03 0SCALE (IN FEET)2040CALL 48 HOURSBEFORE YOU DIGIT'S THE LAW!DIAL 811SUNSHINE STATE ONE CALL OF FLORIDA, INC.Know what's below.Call before you dig.REVISED PER COUNTY COMMENTS.1 REVISED PER COUNTY COMMENTS.2 REVISED PER COUNTY COMMENTS.3 This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Cornelison Engineering & Design, Inc.(CED) shall be without liability to CED. Drawing name: P:\1509044 - 7-11, Santa Barbara Blvd, Naples\Cadd\Construction\C03 - 7-11 NAPLES - DEMO PLAN.dwg C03 Jul 22, 2019 6:25pm by: RicardoRamos REVISIONSNo.DATE SHEET NUMBERPROJECT NO.DATEDRAWN BY SCALE CHECKED BY DESIGNED BY AS NOTED PROJECT NAME CLIENTSHEET NAME ã FLORIDA PE NO: 3701 SANTA BARBARA BLVD., NAPLES, FL 34104 55433 CRAIG L. CORNELISON, P.E.09/27/181509044CLC ERV CLC VERTICAL CONSTR. MANAGEMENT 7-ELEVEN - NAPLES (SDP PL20180001683)CRAIG L E E C O R N E L I SONFLOR I D APRO F E S SIONA L E N G INEERNo. 55433 L IC E NSE STATE OF 02/11/2019 04/23/2019 07/10/2019 7-22-19 X111239.A.6.gPacket Pg. 747Attachment: Attachment E SDP application PL2018-1683 (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) S 00°07'01" E 240.00'S 89°52'59" W 266.47'C1N 00°07'01" W 250.00'C2N 89°52'59" E 39.54'C3S 66°26'21" E 147.32'N 89°52'59" E 58.00'SANTA BARBARA BLVD FIRE LANENO PARKINGSUBJECT PARCELSITE BENCHMARK #3SITE BENCHMARK #2SITE BENCHMARK #1AERIAL OVERLAYC04 0SCALE (IN FEET)2040This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Cornelison Engineering & Design, Inc.(CED) shall be without liability to CED. Drawing name: P:\1509044 - 7-11, Santa Barbara Blvd, Naples\Cadd\Construction\C04 - 7-11 NAPLES - AERIAL.dwg C04 May 21, 2019 11:19am by: GeraldHarrison REVISIONSNo.DATE SHEET NUMBERPROJECT NO.DATEDRAWN BY SCALE CHECKED BY DESIGNED BY AS NOTED PROJECT NAME CLIENTSHEET NAME ã FLORIDA PE NO: 3701 SANTA BARBARA BLVD., NAPLES, FL 34104 55433 CRAIG L. CORNELISON, P.E.09/27/181509044CLC ERV CLC VERTICAL CONSTR. MANAGEMENT 7-ELEVEN - NAPLES (SDP PL20180001683)CRAIG L E E C O R N E L I SONFLOR I D APRO F E S SIONA L E N G INEERNo. 55433 L IC E NSE STATE OF 5-21-19 9.A.6.gPacket Pg. 748Attachment: Attachment E SDP application PL2018-1683 (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) FFFRLOADING ZONES 00°07'01" E 240.00'S 89°52'59" W 266.47'C1N 00°07'01" W 250.00'C2 N 89°52'59" E 39.54'C3S 66°26'21" E 147.32'N 89°52'59" E 58.00'SANTA BARBARA BLVD FIRE LANESUBJECT PARCELSITE PLANC05 0SCALE (IN FEET)2040CALL 48 HOURSBEFORE YOU DIGIT'S THE LAW!DIAL 811SUNSHINE STATE ONE CALL OF FLORIDA, INC.Know what's below.Call before you dig.REVISED PER COUNTY COMMENTS.1 REVISED PER COUNTY COMMENTS.2 REVISED PER COUNTY COMMENTS.3 This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Cornelison Engineering & Design, Inc.(CED) shall be without liability to CED. Drawing name: P:\1509044 - 7-11, Santa Barbara Blvd, Naples\Cadd\Construction\C05 - 7-11 NAPLES - SITE PLAN.dwg C05 Jul 21, 2019 2:18pm by: CraigCornelison REVISIONSNo.DATE SHEET NUMBERPROJECT NO.DATEDRAWN BY SCALE CHECKED BY DESIGNED BY AS NOTED PROJECT NAME CLIENTSHEET NAME ã FLORIDA PE NO: 3701 SANTA BARBARA BLVD., NAPLES, FL 34104 55433 CRAIG L. CORNELISON, P.E.09/27/181509044CLC ERV CLC VERTICAL CONSTR. MANAGEMENT 7-ELEVEN - NAPLES (SDP PL20180001683)CRAIG L E E C O R N E L I SONFLOR I D APRO F E S SIONA L E N G INEERNo. 55433 L IC E NSE STATE OF 02/11/2019 04/23/2019 07/10/2019 7-21-19 ········9.A.6.gPacket Pg. 749Attachment: Attachment E SDP application PL2018-1683 (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) FFFRLOADING ZONES 00°07'01" E 240.00'S 89°52'59" W 266.47'C1N 00°07'01" W 250.00'C2N 89°52'59" E 39.54'C3S 66°26'21" E 147.32'N 89°52'59" E 58.00'SANTA BARBARA BLVD FIRE LANENO PARKINGSUBJECT PARCELSITE BENCHMARK #3SITE BENCHMARK #2SITE BENCHMARK #1AC11DC11C C11 BC11PAVING, GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLANC06 0SCALE (IN FEET)2040CALL 48 HOURSBEFORE YOU DIGIT'S THE LAW!DIAL 811SUNSHINE STATE ONE CALL OF FLORIDA, INC.Know what's below.Call before you dig.REVISED PER COUNTY COMMENTS.1 REVISED PER COUNTY COMMENTS.2 This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Cornelison Engineering & Design, Inc.(CED) shall be without liability to CED. Drawing name: P:\1509044 - 7-11, Santa Barbara Blvd, Naples\Cadd\Construction\C06 - 7-11 NAPLES - PGD PLAN.dwg C06 Jul 21, 2019 1:53pm by: CraigCornelison REVISIONSNo.DATE SHEET NUMBERPROJECT NO.DATEDRAWN BY SCALE CHECKED BY DESIGNED BY AS NOTED PROJECT NAME CLIENTSHEET NAME ã FLORIDA PE NO: 3701 SANTA BARBARA BLVD., NAPLES, FL 34104 55433 CRAIG L. CORNELISON, P.E.09/27/181509044CLC ERV CLC VERTICAL CONSTR. MANAGEMENT 7-ELEVEN - NAPLES (SDP PL20180001683)CRAIG L E E C O R N E L I SONFLOR I D APRO F E S SIONA L E N G INEERNo. 55433 L IC E NSE STATE OF 02/11/2019 04/23/2019 7-21-19 9.A.6.gPacket Pg. 750Attachment: Attachment E SDP application PL2018-1683 (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) FFFRLOADING ZONES 00°07'01" E 240.00'S 89°52'59" W 266.47'C1N 00°07'01" W 250.00'C2N 89°52'59" E 39.54'C3S 66°26'21" E 147.32'N 89°52'59" E 58.00'SANTA BARBARA BLVD FIRE LANESUBJECT PARCELSITE BENCHMARK #3SITE BENCHMARK #2SITE BENCHMARK #1UTILITY PLANC07 0SCALE (IN FEET)2040CALL 48 HOURSBEFORE YOU DIGIT'S THE LAW!DIAL 811SUNSHINE STATE ONE CALL OF FLORIDA, INC.Know what's below.Call before you dig.REVISED PER COUNTY COMMENTS.1 REVISED PER COUNTY COMMENTS.2 REVISED PER COUNTY COMMENTS.3 This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Cornelison Engineering & Design, Inc.(CED) shall be without liability to CED. Drawing name: P:\1509044 - 7-11, Santa Barbara Blvd, Naples\Cadd\Construction\C07 - 7-11 NAPLES - UTIL PLAN.dwg C07 Jul 21, 2019 1:55pm by: CraigCornelison REVISIONSNo.DATE SHEET NUMBERPROJECT NO.DATEDRAWN BY SCALE CHECKED BY DESIGNED BY AS NOTED PROJECT NAME CLIENTSHEET NAME ã FLORIDA PE NO: 3701 SANTA BARBARA BLVD., NAPLES, FL 34104 55433 CRAIG L. CORNELISON, P.E.09/27/181509044CLC ERV CLC VERTICAL CONSTR. MANAGEMENT 7-ELEVEN - NAPLES (SDP PL20180001683)CRAIG L E E C O R N E L I SONFLOR I D APRO F E S SIONA L E N G INEERNo. 55433 L IC E NSE STATE OF 02/11/2019 04/23/2019 07/10/2019 7-21-19 ” ” ” ” ” 9.A.6.gPacket Pg. 751Attachment: Attachment E SDP application PL2018-1683 (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) FFFRSANTA BARBARA BLVDSITE BENCHMARK #2EROSION CONTROL PLANC08CALL 48 HOURSBEFORE YOU DIGIT'S THE LAW!DIAL 811SUNSHINE STATE ONE CALL OF FLORIDA, INC.Know what's below.Call before you dig.EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHOWN HEREIN ARE THERECOMMENDED MINIMUM EROSION CONTROL MEASURES.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO IMPLEMENT ALL EROSIONCONTROL MEASURES AND TO MODIFY AS NECESSARY TOENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH THE NATIONAL POLLUTANTDISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES).ENGINEER:CORNELISON ENGINEERING & DESIGN, INC.CRAIG L. CORNELISON, P.E. #5543338039 OLD 5TH AVENUEZEPHYRHILLS, FLORIDA 33542PHONE: (813) 788-7835EMAIL: craig@cornelison-eng.comDEVELOPER:7-ELEVEN, INC.CONTACT: JOSH TAYLOR1209 S. WHITE CHAPEL BLVD., STE 180SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS 76092PHONE: (817) 912-5572EMAIL: jtaylor@verticalcm.comSURVEYOR:CPH, INC.CONTACT: PAUL J KATREK500 WEST FULTON STREETSANFORD, FLORIDA 32771PHONE: (407) 322-6841EMAIL: pkatrek@cphcorp.com0SCALE (IN FEET)2040REVISED PER COUNTY COMMENTS.1 REVISED PER COUNTY COMMENTS.2 This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Cornelison Engineering & Design, Inc.(CED) shall be without liability to CED. Drawing name: P:\1509044 - 7-11, Santa Barbara Blvd, Naples\Cadd\Construction\C08 - 7-11 NAPLES - EROS PLAN.dwg C08 Jul 21, 2019 1:58pm by: CraigCornelison REVISIONSNo.DATE SHEET NUMBERPROJECT NO.DATEDRAWN BY SCALE CHECKED BY DESIGNED BY AS NOTED PROJECT NAME CLIENTSHEET NAME ã FLORIDA PE NO: 3701 SANTA BARBARA BLVD., NAPLES, FL 34104 55433 CRAIG L. CORNELISON, P.E.09/27/181509044CLC ERV CLC VERTICAL CONSTR. MANAGEMENT 7-ELEVEN - NAPLES (SDP PL20180001683)CRAIG L E E C O R N E L I SONFLOR I D APRO F E S SIONA L E N G INEERNo. 55433 L IC E NSE STATE OF 02/11/2019 04/23/2019 7-21-19 9.A.6.gPacket Pg. 752Attachment: Attachment E SDP application PL2018-1683 (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) EROSION CONTROL DETAILSC09 STATE OF FLORIDA EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL - DESIGNER & REVIEWER MANUALSILTSACK INLET PROTECTION DETAIL (TYPE A)N.T.S.SILT FENCE APPLICATIONSINSTALLING A FILTER FABRIC SILT FENCEN.T.S.This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Cornelison Engineering & Design, Inc.(CED) shall be without liability to CED. Drawing name: P:\1509044 - 7-11, Santa Barbara Blvd, Naples\Cadd\Construction\C09 - 7-11 NAPLES - EROS DETL.dwg C09 May 21, 2019 11:24am by: GeraldHarrison REVISIONSNo.DATE SHEET NUMBERPROJECT NO.DATEDRAWN BY SCALE CHECKED BY DESIGNED BY AS NOTED PROJECT NAME CLIENTSHEET NAME ã FLORIDA PE NO: 3701 SANTA BARBARA BLVD., NAPLES, FL 34104 55433 CRAIG L. CORNELISON, P.E.09/27/181509044CLC ERV CLC VERTICAL CONSTR. MANAGEMENT 7-ELEVEN - NAPLES (SDP PL20180001683)CRAIG L E E C O R N E L I SONFLOR I D APRO F E S SIONA L E N G INEERNo. 55433 L IC E NSE STATE OF 5-21-19 9.A.6.gPacket Pg. 753Attachment: Attachment E SDP application PL2018-1683 (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) CONSTRUCTION DETAILSC10STD. 6" CURBDRIVEWAY SURFACENOSE DOWN TO FINISHGRADETYPICAL ELEVATIONTYPE 2TYPE 16'-0"1'-0"STD. 6" CURBCURB TRANSITION DETAIL#4 BARS, 18" LONG(TWO PER GUARD)6'-0"2" MIN.3" MAX.12" (±)6" MAX 5" MIN.PITCHOPTIONALR=2"CAST ORRUBBED8" MIN.9" MAX.4" MIN.5" MAX.5/8" OR 3/4" HOLES2" MIN.3" MAX.2'CURB FACE OF CONCRETE WHEELSTOP PER FDOT INDEX 520-001SIDEWALK DETAILNOTES:AASECTION A - AMETAL POSTSIGN DETAIL3' R1' RONSITE PAVEMENT MARKINGSH.C. PAVEMENT MARKING DETAILPER FDOT INDEX 711-001°UNIVERSAL SYMBOL OF ACCESSIBILITYPER FDOT INDEX 711-00124'± NOMINAL 24'± NOMINALTYP. EXPANSION JOINT & REBAR LAYOUT DETAIL6"TYPICAL SAW CUT JOINT DETAILCONCRETE3/8" ANCHOR RODGRADEGRANULARNATIVE SOIL10"21-7/8"±1/2"ELEVATION VIEW34"±1/2"GRADE19-1/2"±1/2"44"17-1/8"2-3/8" O.D. TUBINGU RACK | 1 LOOP 2 BIKESN.T.S.This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Cornelison Engineering & Design, Inc.(CED) shall be without liability to CED. Drawing name: P:\1509044 - 7-11, Santa Barbara Blvd, Naples\Cadd\Construction\C10 - 7-11 NAPLES - CON DETL.dwg C10 May 21, 2019 11:25am by: GeraldHarrison REVISIONSNo.DATE SHEET NUMBERPROJECT NO.DATEDRAWN BY SCALE CHECKED BY DESIGNED BY AS NOTED PROJECT NAME CLIENTSHEET NAME ã FLORIDA PE NO: 3701 SANTA BARBARA BLVD., NAPLES, FL 34104 55433 CRAIG L. CORNELISON, P.E.09/27/181509044CLC ERV CLC VERTICAL CONSTR. MANAGEMENT 7-ELEVEN - NAPLES (SDP PL20180001683)CRAIG L E E C O R N E L I SONFLOR I D APRO F E S SIONA L E N G INEERNo. 55433 L IC E NSE STATE OF 5-21-19 9.A.6.gPacket Pg. 754Attachment: Attachment E SDP application PL2018-1683 (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 0SCALE (IN FEET)10'20'0SCALE (IN FEET)5'10'HORIZONTAL:VERTICAL:SECTION - ASECTION - BSECTION - DSECTION - CLIGHT DUTY ASPHALT PAVING DETAILN.T.S.PER PLAN6"6"1'-0"4" CONCRETE CURB EDGE WALK1" RADIUSPARKING AS SPECIFIED6"x6"-1.4x1.4 W.W.F.2 - #4 BARS CONT.INTEGRAL CURB AND SIDEWALK DETAILN.T.S.8"6"1'-0"PARKING AS SPECIFIEDTYPE "D" CONCRETE CURB DETAILN.T.S.6"JOINT SEAL12" EXP. JOINT ANDPREFORMED JOINT FILLERASPHALT PAVING DETAILN.T.S.CONCRETE PAVEMENT DETAILN.T.S.REVISED PER COUNTY COMMENTS.1 REVISED PER COUNTY COMMENTS.2 This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Cornelison Engineering & Design, Inc.(CED) shall be without liability to CED. Drawing name: P:\1509044 - 7-11, Santa Barbara Blvd, Naples\Cadd\Construction\C11 - 7-11 NAPLES - CON DETL.dwg C11 May 21, 2019 11:27am by: GeraldHarrison REVISIONSNo.DATE SHEET NUMBERPROJECT NO.DATEDRAWN BY SCALE CHECKED BY DESIGNED BY AS NOTED PROJECT NAME CLIENTSHEET NAME ã FLORIDA PE NO: 3701 SANTA BARBARA BLVD., NAPLES, FL 34104 55433 CRAIG L. CORNELISON, P.E.09/27/181509044CLC ERV CLC VERTICAL CONSTR. MANAGEMENT 7-ELEVEN - NAPLES (SDP PL20180001683)CRAIG L E E C O R N E L I SONFLOR I D APRO F E S SIONA L E N G INEERNo. 55433 L IC E NSE STATE OF 02/11/2019 04/23/2019 5-21-19 CONSTRUCTION DETAILSC11 SP3SP2SP1FINISH FLOOR0'-0" A.F.F.3'-4" A.F.F.6'-7-3/4" A.F.F.TOP OF WALL9.A.6.gPacket Pg. 755Attachment: Attachment E SDP application PL2018-1683 (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) UTILITY DETAILSC12REVISED PER COUNTY COMMENTS.1 REVISED PER COUNTY COMMENTS.2 REVISED PER COUNTY COMMENTS.3 This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Cornelison Engineering & Design, Inc.(CED) shall be without liability to CED. Drawing name: P:\1509044 - 7-11, Santa Barbara Blvd, Naples\Cadd\Construction\C12 - 7-11 NAPLES - UTIL DETL.dwg C12 Jul 10, 2019 2:21pm by: GeraldHarrison REVISIONSNo.DATE SHEET NUMBERPROJECT NO.DATEDRAWN BY SCALE CHECKED BY DESIGNED BY AS NOTED PROJECT NAME CLIENTSHEET NAME ã FLORIDA PE NO: 3701 SANTA BARBARA BLVD., NAPLES, FL 34104 55433 CRAIG L. CORNELISON, P.E.09/27/181509044CLC ERV CLC VERTICAL CONSTR. MANAGEMENT 7-ELEVEN - NAPLES (SDP PL20180001683)CRAIG L E E C O R N E L I SONFLOR I D APRO F E S SIONA L E N G INEERNo. 55433 L IC E NSE STATE OF 02/11/2019 04/23/2019 07/10/2019 7-10-19 9.A.6.gPacket Pg. 756Attachment: Attachment E SDP application PL2018-1683 (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) R 0SCALE (IN FEET)10'20'0SCALE (IN FEET)5'10'HORIZONTAL:VERTICAL:SEWER PROFILESEWER PROFILE PLANC13 0SCALE (IN FEET)1020CALL 48 HOURSBEFORE YOU DIGIT'S THE LAW!DIAL 811SUNSHINE STATE ONE CALL OF FLORIDA, INC.Know what's below.Call before you dig.REVISED PER COUNTY COMMENTS.2 REVISED PER COUNTY COMMENTS.3 This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Cornelison Engineering & Design, Inc.(CED) shall be without liability to CED. Drawing name: P:\1509044 - 7-11, Santa Barbara Blvd, Naples\Cadd\Construction\C13 - 7-11 NAPLES - PROF PLAN.dwg C13 Jul 21, 2019 2:02pm by: CraigCornelison REVISIONSNo.DATE SHEET NUMBERPROJECT NO.DATEDRAWN BY SCALE CHECKED BY DESIGNED BY AS NOTED PROJECT NAME CLIENTSHEET NAME ã FLORIDA PE NO: 3701 SANTA BARBARA BLVD., NAPLES, FL 34104 55433 CRAIG L. CORNELISON, P.E.09/27/181509044CLC ERV CLC VERTICAL CONSTR. MANAGEMENT 7-ELEVEN - NAPLES (SDP PL20180001683)CRAIG L E E C O R N E L I SONFLOR I D APRO F E S SIONA L E N G INEERNo. 55433 L IC E NSE STATE OF 04/23/2019 07/10/2019 7-21-19 9.A.6.gPacket Pg. 757Attachment: Attachment E SDP application PL2018-1683 (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) FFFRLOADING ZONESANTA BARBARA BLVD FIRE LANE8ft BattenMH: 128ft BattenMH: 128ft BattenMH: 128ft BattenMH: 124ft battenMH: 122ft BattenMH: 12EWS3 A7MH: 12EWS3 A7MH: 12EWS3 A7MH: 12EWS3 A7MH: 12EMMH: 12EMMH: 12EWS3 E3MH: 12EWS3 E3MH: 12EWS3 E3MH: 12EWS3 E3MH: 12EWS3 E3MH: 12EWS3 E3MH: 12SF4_LMH: 20SF4__RMH: 20EWS3 A7MH: 12ECRABMH: 14.5SF4__RMH: 20SF4_BMH: 20SA4_R1MH: 200.115.812.116.114.711.914.813.611.413.617.413.317.712.110.712.117.613.417.913.411.313.415.212.215.316.212.716.312.711.012.718.013.518.212.410.812.316.712.916.914.411.714.413.611.213.615.611.615.92.93.45.54.03.43.04.04.33.53.73.23.34.22.72.21.31.00.54.33.74.34.91.91.94.46.36.84.11.91.30.94.73.61.61.88.54.12.01.20.60.42.71.81.41.83.76.17.17.28.98.59.67.94.11.80.80.40.33.84.82.91.71.51.51.51.61.31.21.21.42.12.43.15.611.24.81.70.70.40.34.44.74.42.41.61.21.11.01.01.01.01.11.21.11.95.75.11.50.60.40.30.91.74.84.31.40.50.30.21.21.75.74.91.40.50.20.11.11.65.04.41.30.50.21.21.75.34.71.30.50.20.11.21.75.54.71.30.50.20.11.21.75.04.41.30.40.20.11.21.85.84.91.30.40.20.11.31.74.94.31.30.40.20.11.21.75.64.81.30.40.20.11.21.75.24.51.30.40.20.11.21.65.14.51.30.40.20.11.11.75.64.81.30.40.20.11.00.81.54.74.11.20.40.10.15.05.55.53.73.53.63.32.61.71.41.10.90.70.61.45.14.41.10.30.14.45.94.33.65.24.84.44.52.31.41.10.70.50.51.03.28.27.98.27.72.80.80.33.63.73.44.66.04.94.75.23.81.81.10.60.40.30.51.12.02.22.21.91.07.01.86.21.75.41.85.11.85.31.96.02.06.71.87.31.96.24.84.65.77.92.72.42.22.12.41.81.61.61.72.15.84.54.45.68.00.60.30.40.20.20.40.50.70.80.60.30.30.20.30.40.30.20.10.10.10.10.10.10.20.30.40.30.30.20.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.20.30.41.02.13.23.23.23.43.23.53.12.01.21.41.91.81.20.50.40.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.20.61.11.82.21.20.80.50.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.20.61.31.52.61.71.10.50.2x107-Eleven BuildingParking 1Parking 2Parking 3Parking 4Entrance 1Entrance 2Entrance 3Entrance 4Entrance 5Car WashAir PumpDumpsterGeneral ApproachProperty LineGas Canopyx14SITE LIGHTING PLANSL1 0SCALE (IN FEET)2040REVISED PER COUNTY COMMENTS.1 This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Cornelison Engineering & Design, Inc.(CED) shall be without liability to CED. Drawing name: P:\1509044 - 7-11, Santa Barbara Blvd, Naples\Cadd\Construction\SL1 - 7-11 NAPLES - PHOTOMETRIC PLAN.dwg SL1 Jul 03, 2019 5:32pm by: GeraldHarrison REVISIONSNo.DATE SHEET NUMBERPROJECT NO.DATEDRAWN BY SCALE CHECKED BY DESIGNED BY AS NOTED PROJECT NAME CLIENTSHEET NAME ã FLORIDA PE NO: 3701 SANTA BARBARA BLVD., NAPLES, FL 34104 55433 CRAIG L. CORNELISON, P.E.09/27/181509044CLC ERV CLC VERTICAL CONSTR. MANAGEMENT 7-ELEVEN - NAPLES (SDP PL20180001683)CRAIG L E E C O R N E L I SONFLOR I D APRO F E S SIONA L E N G INEERNo. 55433 L IC E NSE STATE OF 02/11/2019 7-03-19Luminaire ScheduleSymbolQtyLabelArrangementLLFDescriptionArr. WattsArr. Lum. Lumens12ft BattenSINGLE1.000GE 24 4100K Batten Strip GEWI102441BAT-SY8.3476814ECRABSINGLE1.000ECRA0B5F5501BWHTE6481106EWS3 E3SINGLE1.000EWS3_E3D150_____90860014EWS3 A7SINGLE1.000EWS3_A7D150_____-120-277V2529002EMSINGLE0.010LEDPRS-BR-CL (Phillips)203248ft BattenSINGLE1.000GE 96 4100K Batten Strip GEWI109641BAT-SY33307314ft battenSINGLE1.000GE 48 4100K Batten Strip GEWI104841BAT-SY16.6815361SA4_R1SINGLE1.0001-EASC0A4F550DC____D with ELSEASXRS1BLCK (Right)4424002SF4__RSINGLE1.0001-EASA0F4F5579C Color ELS-EASX-FS2-BLCK Double Module199107671SF4_LSINGLE1.0001-EASA0F4F5579C Color ELS-EASX-FS2-BLCK Double Module199107671SF4_BSINGLE1.0001-EASA0F4F5579C Color ELS-EASX-FBN-BLCK DOUBLE MODULE19916088Calculation SummaryLabelCalcTypeUnitsAvgMaxMinAvg/MinMax/MinAir PumpIlluminanceFc0.100.10.11.001.00CanopyIlluminanceFc14.0118.210.71.311.70DumpsterIlluminanceFc3.153.42.91.091.17Entrance 1IlluminanceFc4.305.53.41.261.62Entrance 2IlluminanceFc3.704.33.01.231.43Entrance 3IlluminanceFc3.403.73.21.061.16Entrance 4IlluminanceFc3.454.22.71.281.56Entrance 5IlluminanceFc1.252.20.52.504.40General ApproachIlluminanceFc2.5111.20.125.10112.00Parking 1IlluminanceFc3.987.31.72.344.29Parking 2IlluminanceFc4.107.92.11.953.76Parking 3IlluminanceFc3.718.01.62.325.00Parking 4IlluminanceFc0.380.60.21.903.00Property LineIlluminanceFc0.633.50.0N.A.N.A.9.A.6.gPacket Pg. 758Attachment: Attachment E SDP application PL2018-1683 (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.gPacket Pg. 759Attachment: Attachment E SDP application PL2018-1683 (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.gPacket Pg. 760Attachment: Attachment E SDP application PL2018-1683 (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.gPacket Pg. 761Attachment: Attachment E SDP application PL2018-1683 (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 7-Eleven, Inc. Craig L. Cornelison, P.E. P.O. Box 711 Dallas TX 75221-0711 Craig L. Cornelison, P.E. Cornelison Engineering & Design, Inc. 38039 Old 5th Avenue Zephyrhills FL 33542 (813) 788-7835 - - (813) 788-7062 craig@cornelison-eng.com 7-Eleven #34816/PL20180001785 James Sabo 214-601-5495 ltucker@verticalcm.com 12/3/2018 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 762 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) X X side yard setback for existing car wash; setback for fuel canopy 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 763 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) X 1 X 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 764 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) X Craig L. Cornelison, P.E. 11/2/18 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 765 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) November 2, 2018 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 766 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 767 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 7-Eleven, Inc., P.O. Box 711, Dallas, TX 75221-0711 see attached for list of officers 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 768 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 769 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 770 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 7-Eleven, Inc. P.O. Box 711 Dallas, TX 75221-0711 Officer/Director Detail : Title PCEO, DIRECTOR Name DEPINTO, JOSEPH M Address 3200 HACKBERRY ROAD City-State-Zip:IRVING TX 75063 Title SR VP, GC, SECRETARY Name GASAWAY, RANKIN L Address 3200 HACKBERRY ROAD City-State-Zip:IRVING TX 75063 Title AS, FRANCHISE SALES REP Name GOLDSMITH, JOSEPH Address 9351 CYPRESS LAKE DR City-State-Zip:FT MYERS FL 33919 Title AS, FRANCHISE SALES REP Name REINA, KATHRYN Address 3200 HACKBERRY ROAD City-State-Zip:IRVING TX 75063 Title AS, FRANCHISE SALES REP Name QURESHI, ASIF J Address 9351 CYPRESS LAKE DRIVE City-State-Zip:FORT MYERS FL 33919 Title AS, FRANCHISE SALES REP Name BYNES, MICHAEL Address 9351 CYPRESS LAKE DR City-State-Zip:FT. MYERS FL 33919 Title AS, FRANCHISE SALES REP Name STEVENS, WINSTON (DOUG) Address 800 TRAFALGAR COURT #360 City-State-Zip:MAITLAND FL 32751 Title AS, SR. DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR Name DISTEL, GRANT Address 3200 HACKBERRY ROAD City-State-Zip:IRVING TX 75063 Title VP, MERGERS & ACQ DEVELOPMENT Name WILLIAMS, IAN C Address 3200 HACKBERRY ROAD ATTN: CORP. INCOME TAX DEPT City-State-Zip:IRVING TX 75063 Title VP, FLORIDA ZONE MANAGER Name SUMMERS, JAMES Address 3200 HACKBERRY ROAD ATTN: CORP. INCOME TAX DEPT City-State-Zip:IRVING TX 75063 Title ASSISTANT SECRETARY - SENIOR DIRECTOR TRANSACTION TAX Name BAKER, JAMES C Address 3200 HACKBERRY ROAD City-State-Zip:IRVING TX 75063 Title REAL ESTATE MANAGER Name BANTOS, CHARLES Address 3200 HACKBERRY ROAD ATTN: CORP. INCOME TAX DEPT City-State-Zip:IRVING TX 75063 Title VICE PRESIDENT - CONSTRUCTION, ENGINEERING & FACILITIES Name NACHTRAB, ERIC J Address 3200 HACKBERRY ROAD City-State-Zip:IRVING TX 75063 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 771 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) November 2, 2018 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 772 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 773 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 774 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 775 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 776 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 777 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 778 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 779 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) Collier County Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Drive N. Naples, FL 34104 239-252-2400 RECEIPT OF PAYMENT Receipt Number:2018517679 Transaction Number:2018-056427 Date Paid:06/28/2018 Amount Due:$500.00 Payment Details:Payment Method Amount Paid Check Number Credit Card $500.00 12325269-C1093 7804 Amount Paid:$500.00 Change / Overage:$0.00 Contact:Cornelison Engineering - Craig Cornelison 38039 Old 5th Avenue Zephyrhills, FL 33542 FEE DETAILS: Fee Description Reference Number Original Fee Amount Paid GL Account Pre-application Meeting PL20180001785 $500.00 $500.00 131-138326-341276 Cashier Name:RichardKoenigsknecht Batch Number:7471 Entered By: ThomasClarke 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 780 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 781 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 782 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 783 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 784 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 785 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 786 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 787 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 788 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 789 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 790 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 791 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 792 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) Applicant/Agent may also send site plans or conceptual plans for review in advance if desired. PL20180001785 7- Eleven #34816 (DR) PRE-APP INFORMATION Assigned Ops Staff: Thomas Clarke Camden Smith, (Ops Staff) • Name and Number of who submitted pre-app request Craig L. Cornelison,P.E., Cornelison Engineering & Design, Inc. email: Craig@cornelison-eng.com • Agent to list for PL# Craig L. Cornelison,P.E., Cornelison Engineering & Design, Inc • Owner of property (all owners for all parcels) 7-Eleven % Ryan LLC, Three Galleria Tower, 13155 Noel Rd #100 LC73, Dallas, TX 75240 • Confirm Purpose of Pre-App: Redevelopment of the existing 7-11/Mobile Mart convenience gas station. The existing building will be demolished, and a new 6,049 SF 7-11 Convenience store will be constructed. The existing canopy, fuel pumps, and car wash will remain. • Please list the density request of the project if applicable and number of homes/units/offices/docks (any that apply): • Details about Project: Site Plan with Deviations for Redevelopment and Site Improvement Plan – Back to back meetings with Zoning and Planning Staff. REQUIRED Supplemental Information provided by: Name Title Email Phone Created April 5, 2017 Location: K:\CDES Planning Services\Current\Zoning Staff Information STAFF FORM FOR SUPPLEMENTAL PRE-APPLICATION MEETING INFORMATION 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 793 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) May 17, 2018 Ms. Christine Willoughby, Senior Planner Collier County Growth Management Division 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Tel. (239) 252-5748 RE: 7-Eleven #34816 3701 Santa Barbara Boulevard, Naples, FL Parcel ID No. 23945007035 Dear Ms. Willoughby: This project involves the redevelopment of the existing 7-11/Mobil Mart convenience gas station. The existing convenience building will be demolished, and a new 6,049 SF 7-11 convenience store will be constructed. The existing canopy, fuel pumps, and car wash will remain. It is our understanding that a previous preapplication meeting for this same site was held on 6/20/17, but with a different applicant (PL#20170002079). We also understand that this project will likely require a companion Site Plan with Deviations for Redevelopment Project (DR) application, which requires a separate preapplication meeting with zoning staff. We would like to respectfully request back-to-back preapplication meetings with both planning and zoning staff. As instructed by Chris Scott, we have submitted two (2) separate preapplication meeting requests. Our first preapplication meeting request for a Site Improvement Plan was submitted on 5/8/18 (PL20180001683). If further information is required for this request, or if you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, CORNELISON ENGINEERING & DESIGN, INC. Craig L. Cornelison, P.E. Florida PE #55433 CLC:mac cc: File 1509044\7-11 Naples\Collier Co\DR Preapp Cover Letter 38039 Old 5th Avenue Zephyrhills, FL 33542 Tel. (813) 788-7835 Fax. (813) 788-7062 www.cornelison-eng.com 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 794 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 795 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 796 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) $ 973,400 $ 550,000 $ 1,002,363 $ 1,497,500 $ 294,479 $ 1,791,979 $ 155,828 $ 1,636,151 $ 1,791,979 $ 1,636,151 Collier County Property Appraiser Property Summary Parcel No 23945007035 Site Address 3701 SANTA BARBARA BLVD Site City NAPLES Site Zone *Note 34104 Name / Address 7-ELEVEN INC % RYAN LLC THREE GALLERIA TOWER 13155 NOEL RD #100 LB73 City DALLAS State TX Zip 75240 Map No. Strap No. Section Township Range Acres  *Estimated 4B32 184600 F 1.34B32 32 49 26 1.72 Legal BERKSHIRE LAKES UNIT 1 THAT PT OF TR F REF AS OUTPARCEL E DESC IN OR 1580 PG 501 AND THAT PART DESC IN OR 3971/818 Millage Area 202 Millage Rates *Calculations Sub./Condo 184600 - BERKSHIRE LAKES UNIT 1 School Other Total Use Code 26 - SERVICE STATIONS 5.122 6.6024 11.7244 Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) Date Book-Page Amount 03/28/11 4678-780 01/24/06 3971-818 12/19/90 1580-499 2017 Certified Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Land Value (+) Improved Value (=) Market Value (-) 10% Cap (=) Assessed Value (=) School Taxable Value (=) Taxable Value If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll Page 1 of 1 5/24/2018http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/RecordDetail.html?sid=868818659&ccpaver=1710181149&F... 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 797 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) Collier County Property Appraiser Property Detail Parcel No 23945007035 Site Address 3701 SANTA BARBARA BLVD Site City NAPLES Site Zone *Note 34104 Name / Address 7-ELEVEN INC % RYAN LLC THREE GALLERIA TOWER 13155 NOEL RD #100 LB73 City DALLAS State TX Zip 75240 Permits Tax Yr Issuer Permit # CO Date Tmp CO Final Bldg Type 1991 COUNTY 90-10262 04/21/91 1991 COUNTY 90-9618 04/30/91 10/29/90 1991 COUNTY 90-9619 04/29/91 1991 COUNTY 90-9620 04/29/91 OTHER Land  # Calc Code Units 10 COMMERCIAL SF 44431 20 COMMERCIAL SF 30444 Building/Extra Features  # Year Built Description Area Adj Area 10 1991 RESIDENTIAL 960 960 20 1991 GARAGE 864 864 30 1991 GARAGE 64 64 40 1991 CANOPY 4890 4890 50 1991 CONC P 5542 5542 60 1991 ASPH P 55000 55000 Page 1 of 1 5/24/2018http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/RecordDetail.html?sid=868818659&ccpaver=1710181149&F... 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 798 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) Collier County Property Appraiser Property Aerial Parcel No 23945007035 Site Address 3701 SANTA BARBARA BLVD Site City NAPLES Site Zone *Note 34104 Open GIS in a New Window with More Features. Page 1 of 1 5/24/2018http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/RecordDetail.html?sid=868818659&ccpaver=1710181149&F... 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 799 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) Collier County Property Appraiser Page 1 of 1 5/24/2018http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/Docviewer.html?sid=868819586&ccpaver=... 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 800 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.hPacket Pg. 801Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 802 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 803 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 804 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) Crounty COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION www.colliergov,net 28OO NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239J. 252-2400 Pre-Application Meeting Notes Petition Type:SDP Date and Time: f UE 612012017 1:30-2:30pm Assigned Planner:CHRISTINE WILLOUGHBY Engineering Manager (for PPL's and FP's): Project lnformation Proiect Name:BERKSHIRE GAS STATION P1n.20170002079 23945007035 BERKSHIRE LAKES PUDProperty lD #:Current Zoning: Project Address:City:State: _ Zip: Agent Name:Phone: Agent/Firm Address:City:State: _ Zip: _ Property Owner Please provide the fol i. Total Acreage: lowing, if applica ble: 1.72 t, iv. ii. Proposed f of Residential Units: - Proposed commercial square roohge: Z1OO For Amendments, indicate the original petition number: lf there is an Ordinance or Resolution associated with this project, please indicate the type and number:4 ru2o 63 -\Uo vi. lf the pro,ect is within a Plat, provide the name and AR#/PLf: ,! Iou i^4.-- (*>-lo o,r\ \d_ 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 805 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) et County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 28OO NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORtDA 34104 (2391252-Z4OO Meeting Notes I +n^ r^;,11 l.anro-{D LI\r \uAu.t 5.o 5-o 5 r:w ,.It-.r LNC ,Ic ..j.p.uF ar((\ rS (n^.ct Gor 1€ h.€rOt\ P ( o r{frL Con.. (r l,<- qlo6!A-. q rl u) o L lra4 u S c! {- 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 806 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) t C.OUnw 28OO NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPTES, FLORIDA 34104 (2391 2s2-2400 -{.., o o i( ttts N r"o\. (sX ({t-a r^.c<t o,r {or'v s.s+a r r.: o?-ta.s t \) ,Jt\trg ooo ,r."" o\ o\. *r. €'r.ti €4. v.\.,\t. ..s clur hAs t.- (o DS \sNs. €tv r"J b1 ca 7'ts /ra1z/ on /.? C -t r't Ac ( 3J Af /€ /e t 0 J .4 /4 a- [-J-/"€- /<vt<tl> -UFPA t- l{,fisT 7e ov/AJ' o H.DE k t/rt 3o)Fr L) €)r 4 t'.) ni,.: "n^,'t^ -."qf ^Y 3fI.aD !) !- 3o-(r" a ().u, av1 +a "*A- 0 raJ "J.-cg,6'.4)" COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION www,colliergov.net Meeting Notes Sop +. 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 807 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) .Rfu,C-ounty COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION www.cqlliergov.net 28OO NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (2391252-2400 Meeting Notes Stormwaler P1201 70002079-SDPA Site is in X500 and AH. Existinq buildinq in X500. lf proposed build inos in AH,FF will be BFE+1 or 100 year des ign flood elevation, whichever is g reater. lf proposed building in X500, FF will be BFE or 1 00 design f lood elevation, whichever is g reater. Part of existing ERP 1 1-00364-5-06. Updale land use summary. Submit to county same reporVcalculations submitted to SFWMD lor permit modi{ication Provide full stormwater engineering report, with water quality calculalions, routings and discharge rates, as applicable. Max allowable discharge is 0.15 cfs/acre. lnclude storm sewer pipe sizing calculations, as applicable. lnclude paving and drainage details, provi de ownership/maintenance of stormwater management system and site infrastructu re notes, engineering s tormwaler checklist, 6-pinion ofcosllo rst-te work. Pfans must be in NAV datum 'dt l.-.tH, t 4 hti ftrc rS& r (-,I (L,,l Ln r')Ct S(ur1lC 4cJ fr1LS Lha (- lhz bSl0 L \)- B:x etcr<S'trEE LAI€"S Us<- 5 ,o 5,o5 {L\L 5.o5, a8'-A\tr.reS r prA.t-Y cra(\E-S o tuL,d'A&1JASiJ \e aO SiT€.b -Aa) *.rr,urrtES ' V t ^ln-rFS 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 808 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) f County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION www.colliergov.net 28OO NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (2391 2s2-24OO Meeting Notes Lnurfzh^f,' fttt-e-t ).J) r)Lt 'n I cafif AEe^, 't/'. t"F,fr / ,n-rfqt ,!/"N3 ['- 1l'r v.Frr' 17Sz.4t t €1 t/-h Wn)phv,nfa ){* /ov6 L/ ttt f l"/rf r+to I , tL, 1n 4/,- p)LE { }f.Ef fl*u, df t iturJ . flatry(tFf trZt t( 4(?oy' /c,az, lz.E't,.t , oEl. 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 809 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) Pre-Application Meeting Utilities Review Checklist /Notes o o o lrrigation source: Potable / Other water Meter Sizing Form required? Yes / No Elr5-r 'n q t^{itrn- / TBD Master metered CUE outside of (but co No o o o o ous to) ROW required for master meter and backflow assembly Fire service system provided? Yes / No 'T'13 ) All private flre service systems require a backflow preventer with a leak detection meter per W-8, W-11, or W-11A. Separate fire service connection? Yes / No fBD Alternative to passinS fire flow through master meter for commercaal projecti only. Loop water distribution system to avoid dead ends? Yes Who will own and maintain the onsite potable water system? County /PIlerty Owner (Association) Who will own and maintain the onsite sanitary sewer system? County /Pro e Owner (Association) TBO(s) and BSP(s) required? Yes Required for PWS main extensions. o o o o o o Provide two independent connections to source main {unless served by a master meter) or stub-out forfuture development. \ Gap configuration or TBF required? Ves @/ Gap confiSuration required for more than 50 LF ot4" or lar8er pipe. TBF requiredto brinS combustibles onsite priorto prelim inary utilities acceptance Who will install the service lead and meter box? County / Contractor County will typically install services 5 2". Who will install the meter and backflow preventer? County / Contractor County will installservices s 2". Contradorwillinstall> 3". Maintenance driveway required for meter? Ves /@ 1O'x16'grass driveway over 5" compacted llmerock per W-14A is req'-uked within CUE for meters > 3- \o AFD(s) required? Yes (ft-o) Required at each dead end and,lF-applicable, also nearthe madpoint of a looped PWS main (unless adequate consumption to maintaan minimum residual chloramine is anticipated at the time of Cou nty accepta nce). Not required for private service mains. o Documentation of existing private pump station capacity required? Yes / No o wastewater system capacity report required?@/ No o Grease trap required for food prep? Yes / No 7Db o Oil separator required for floor drains in a vehicle maintenance center, body shop, machine shop, vehicle storage facility, or facility that utilizes petroleum based products? \es I No 18D FDEP permit required for water? Yes /${ Require; for pWS main extensions. Exceptions includevreplacement ofexistinS water main in same location and atsamesize, no morethan 2 sizes larSer, or minimum size per Rsww; relocation of up to 1oo LF ofwater main; discontinuing use ofany existing water main; installation or alteration of anv valve, flow meter, or backflow preventer; installation or alteration ofanylire hydrant or hydrant lead; as wellas installation or alteration of any water service line to a sin8le buildinS, including frre and irriSation lines. o -;-\0v 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 810 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) o FDEP permit required for sewer? Ves @ Required forconstruction or modification o, any collection/transmission system. Exceptions include replacement of existing facilities at same capacityand location as wellas constructlon ofany individualseruice connectlon from a single buildingto a gravity collection system. /@o Outstanding Final Acceptance Obli8ations? Yes o lnclude the following notes in the plans: / Note who will install the meter. / Note who will install the service lead and meter box. y' Note on the plans that all costs and expenses of any and all repairs, replacements, maintenance and restorations of aboveground improvements permitted within a CUE shall be the sole financial responsibility of the grantor, its successors or assigns. / Note that the final meter size shall be determined by Public Utilities. / Note as to who owns and maintains the onsite potable water, non-potable irrigation water, and wastewater systems. / The dedication block on the cover sheet of the plat shall contain appropriate language for all County Utility Easements (CUE). / Note all required inspections require a 48 hour notice (see Utility Ordinance 2014-31, Section 9.4.2.2) o Common mistakes: / Use 350 GPD per residence for water demand (F.A.C. 54E-6.008 for non-residential). / Use 250 GPD per residence for sewage flow (F.A.C. 54E-6.008 for non-residential). / Use latest details (revised U7/20151and include all that apply. r' Pump station sites must account for PUEs and vegetative screening. / Separate irrigation system improvements must be provided. / Pressure mains must be setback 7.5'min. from BOC, drainage structures, and trees. / Separation distances are measured out-to-out. / Setbacks are measured to the centerline of the pipe. o Clarification: r' Cost estimate may exclude fire sprinkler service lines downstream of the backflow preventer but must include flre mains serving on-site fire hydrants. FDCS, PlVs, and check valves may be excluded. / Cost estimate may exclude grease traps and oil separators, which are permitted and inspected separately. 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 811 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) er C-ounty COTLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 28OO NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPIES, FLORIDA 34104 .239],252-2400 FAX: (239) 2s2-63s8 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROjECT OR AMENOMENT On a separate sheet attached to the application, provide a cover letter describing in detail the proposed project or proposed chan8es, including any discussions with the assiBned planner that may be pertinent to the review of the application, and the sheet numbers of the plans affected by the change if applicable. ADIACENT ZONING & IAND USE Zoning Land Use E Pre-Application Meeting and Submittal Requirement Checklist for: Site Development Plan (SDP) or Site Development Plan Amendment (SDPA) Chapter 4 of the Administrative Code The following Submittal Requirement checklist is to be utilized during the Pre-Application Meeting and at time of application submittal. see Chapter 4 of the Administrative Code for submittal requirements. lncomplete submittals will not be accepted. t w y'n, P' N REQUIREMENTS FOR REVIEW floF coPtEs REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED STANDARD REQUIREMENTS: Completed Application (download current form from the county website) Cover Letter explaininB the project Com pleted Add ressing checklist Pre-application meeting notes 6cover sheetSite Develop ment Plan (SDP or SDPA) (signed & sealed) includi PUD Monitoring Schedule 1PUD monitoring report 7 Bp lica b lelnformationa5d Develop ment Commitmen (digitalon PUD Ordina nce 11ZAffidavit of Aut ion & Evi en ce of Authori 6Boundary and Topog raphic Survey (less than 6 months old) Opinion of Title or prop erty owner statement/Affidavit tr1tsRecorded Deed or contract for sale (non-recorded deeds or Property rint-outs will not be accePted)Appraiser p tr1BFee calculation Worksheet & Review fees, signed d1 Copy of Site Development Plans (DWG or DFX format Plane NAD83 feet Florida Ease coordinates )on CDRoM disc in State EEIE[IEIEIEI!.I Reu.3l2/t1 N s tr 1 tr ttrt-Tt--f-E-[E-- L l--Tr--l--Ti-- Page 2 of 9 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 812 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) C-ovmty COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 28OO NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 123912s2-24oo FAx: (239) 252-6358 For pro.iects subject to Architectural Review: Architectural plans must be 1/8" scale minimum (signed & sealed), including: / Every Fagade of each building must be shown on Architectural plans / Building cross sections or typical wall sectionsy' Dumpster details: height, material and color r' Light pole details or cut sheet: height, material and colorr' Color paint chips and roof color paint chips or samples / tloor plans and building elevations / One color rendering of proposed building This project qualifies for a separate "Alternative Architectural Design" submittal per 5.05.08.F. Additional fees (S500.00) and submittal application is required. 6 d n For projects Xg[ subject to Architectural Review: For projects not requiring architectural review: Floor plans and elevations with dimensions. This information, showing floor area by use, is intended only to determine that the use is compatible with the zoning, establish parking requirements, and show building height measurements meeting code. Full architectural or construction drawings are not needed. 6 d 2 q trCompleted Certaficate of Adequate Public Facilities Application, including the lication fee and estimated Traap ct Fee calculations.ortation lm 2firerantsLocation of existing and ro 2Fire Flow tests from Fire De artment (no more than 6 months old) 2 lnformation in the Standard Building Code, type of construction, total square footage under roof, occupancy/use, fire sprinkler data, PLEASE INCLUDE THIS INFORMATION ON EITHER THE COVER PAGE OR SHEET 1 OF THE SIIE PLANS D7Environmental Data Requirements xf1!Conservation easement including signed and sealed legal description and boundary survey for preserve - include protective language, sketch and description in construction plans; contact review staff for current version 1Listed Species Survey; less than 12 months old. lnclude copies of previous surv X-tr1Preserve Management Plan - provided on the site plan Reu.312/71 Page 3 of 9 ARCHITECTURAL OR NON-ARCHITECTURAL REVIEWT # oF REqUIRED NOT REQUIRED tr coA: FIRE: tr ENVIRONMENTAT: tr tX 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 813 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) Qounty COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 28OO NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPTES, FLORIDA 34104 lz39l 2s2-24oo FAx: (239) 252-6358 Transportation lmpact Study or waiver (with applicable fees)2 d tr 1 d tr Engineer's Report, signed & sealed, with assumptions and explanations, by a a registered professional engineer containing the followinB: r' Completed calculations used to design the facilities, includinB but not limited to all water, sewer, road, water mana8ement systems, and all accessory facilities, public or private; / Drainage calculations including 10 year 1 day; 25 year 3 day; 100 year 3 day storm routings / Detailed hydraulic grade line pipe design calculations utilized to desig the stormwater management facilities for the subdivision or development; r' Geo-technical report with soil boring results / EngineerinB Review checklist, signed and sealed by the applicant's professional Engineer; "' Engineer's Opinion of probable cost (Paving, grading, Drainage) r' Status of all other required permits including copies of information and data submitted to the appropriate permitting agencies. il tr1 lf within Collier County Public Utilities Service Area- Engineer's Report, signed & sealed, containing the following: r' Estimated cost of utilities construction, Water & Sewer calculations r' Sewer Hydraulics/ Lift station hydraulics to first downstream master station/ Lift station buoyancy caiculationsr' e.llffi?rE E'issitrdt@ r' Detailed hydraulic design calculations utilized to design the water and sewer facilities regulated by the County. 1Water and/or Sewer availability letter 1ter/sewerDEP UtiI installation perm its 1FormWater Meter Sizi 6 n!!gb!!-!glla!g signed and sealed by a professional Engineer lic practice in the State of Florida or the utility provider ensed to tr6 Landscape & lrrisation Plans, signed and sealed by a landscape architect registered in the State of Florida Re\.312177 Page 4 of 9 TRANSPORTATION:$oF REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED STORMWATER: UTIUTIES: !IGHTING: tr LANDSCAPE & IRRIGATION: 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 814 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) Qunty COLIIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 28OO NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FI.ORIDA 34104 123912s2-24oo FAx: (239) 2s2-63s8 Estimated School lmpact Analysis Application - residential projects only (download the School lmpact Analysis Application from website) School Concurrencv - lf the proposed project includes a residential component, you are required to contact the School District of Collier County al239-377 -0267 lo discuss school concurrency requirements. 1 tr F Electronic copies of all documents and plans in PDF Format and a CD of plans in CAD Format 1 Right-of-Way permit application (County/FDOT) Blasting Permit (BLST) Early Work Authorization (EWA) Excavation Permit (EX) L il tr Permits: All Federal, State and local permits, including but not limited to the following, shall be submitted prior to construction and before the pre- construction meeting. lf approved by the County Manager or designee, an applicant may submit Federal, State and local agency permits at the pre- construction meeting. . SFWMD Permit, Permit Modification, or waiver, including staff report exhibits; . DEP utility installation permits, water/sewer; o Right-of-Way PermiU and . Us Army corps of Engineers permit and exhibit, if applicable. tion Removaland Site Filli Permit P Reu.312/77 Page 5 of 9 SCHOOL CONCURRENCY:fioF coPtES REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED OTHER: F ! OTHER COTI"IER COUNTY PERMIT5 (IF REQUIRED THEY MUST BE sEPARATE APPTICATIONSI tr Utrn Un OTHER AGENCI€S PERMITS (MAY BE REQUIRED}: ri ----l 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 815 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) t C-ouuty COTTIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT OEPARTMENT www.colliergov,net 28OO NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, F[ORIOA 34104 .239t,252-24OO FAX: (239) 2s2-63s8 Fee Calculation Worksheet fl Residentialonlv: Base fee of 55,000.00, plus 5100.00 per residential structure, and $40.00 per dwelling unit. Number of Buildings: _ Number of D/U: _ s_ I Residential onlv: Base fee of S2,5OO.OO, plus SIOO.OO per residential structure, and S40.00 per dwelling unit. Number of Buildings: Number of D/U: _ s_ Non-residential onlv: Base fee of $200.00 per non-residential structure, and 50.10 per sq.ft. tr S5,000.00, plus s_ Number of Buildings: _ Total Square Footage: _ f] Non-residential onlv: Base fee ofS2,5OO.o0, plus $200.00 per non-residential structure, and S0.10 per sq.ft. s Number of Buildings: _ Total Square Footage: _ I when a building consists of both residential and non- residential (commercial, retail, office) uses, the following fees will apply: . 52,500.00 Base fee for SDPA . 5200.00 per structure . 540.00 per residential dwelling unit S0.10 per square foot of non-residential floor area except for parking garage structures shall be calculated at S0.05 per gross square foot of floor area (sq.ft. - xS0.10) (sq. ft. xso.os)S - When a building consists of both residential and non- sidential (commercial, retail, office) uses, the ollowing fees will apply: o $5,000.00 Base fee for 5DP o $200.00 per structure . S40.00 per residential dwelling unit 10 per square foot of non-residential floor area except for parking garage structures shall be calculated at 50.05 per gross square foot of floor area (sq.ft. - xSo.1o) (sq. ft. -xSo.os)S - Fire Review: S150.00ilr,*, ,roooo Reu.312/17 Page 7 of 9 Site Development Plan (SDP) Review Fees Site Develooment Plan Amendment {SDPA} Review Fees 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 816 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) tQu nW pre-con meeting) Cost Estimate S _ 28OO NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (23s) 2s2-2400 FAX: (23e) 252-6358 Construction Document Review: 0.75% of probable water and/or sewer construction costs Cost Estimate S _ Construction lnspection; 2.25% of probable water and/or sewer construction costs (due prior to s_ s s_ een Construction Document Review: 0.75% of probable Paving, Grading, Drainage, LightinB, code Minimum Landscaping, and any other appurtenant cost of construction. / Cost Estimate S - [/Construction lnspection: 2.25% of probable Paving, Grading, Drainage, Lighting, Code Minimum Landscaping, and any other appurtenant cost of construction (due prior to pre-con meetin8) Cost Estimate S Traffic lmpact Studv Review: fl Methodology Review: S5OO.OO, to be paid directly to Transportation at the Methodology Meeting* *Additional Fees to be determined at Methodology Meeting S E Minor Study Review: S75o.oo S E Major study Review: S1,5oo.oo S Utilities: p/+[-uttrU Modeling and Analysis fee: g1,000.0o (only applies if zoned PUD or DRt)s Environmental: ! Site Clearing Permit: S250.00 for the first acreorfraction ofan acre and S5O.OOfor each additional acre or fraction of an acre (53,000.00 maximum) s of acres _ S I Listed or Protected species Review, when an EIS is not required: 51,000.00 S ! Conservation Easement Review: S3Oo.oo application fee plus the following additional site fee . S200.00 for cE acres less than 5 acres; . 5400.00 for CE acres between 5 and 10 acres; . 5600.00 for CE area greater than 10 acres and less than 20 acres; . 5800.00 for cE areas between 20 and 50 acresj and . An additional S2oo.oo for every 40 acres of cE over 50 acres. fi of acres - E s s {$o ) Rev.l/2h7 PaBe 8 of 9 COLTIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www. colliergov. net Other: ffioA R"uiu*' 5200.00 plus S25.00 per residential dweiling unit, or S25.00 per 1,000 sq. ft. commercial (S5,000.00 maximum). ! School Concurrency Review, if required: + Mitigation Fees, if applicable, to be determined by the School District in coordination with the CountY 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 817 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) C-ounty COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net ! other ree, if applicable: 28OO NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FTORIDA 34104 {239!- 2s2-24oo FAx: (239) 252-6358 Fee subtotal Pre-application fee credit, if applicable Total Fees Required: s s s s s_ Ap p I i c o nt/A g e nt S i g n ot u re Dote All checks poyoble to: Board of County Commissioners The completed application, all required submittal materials and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Department/ Development Services ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, F| 34104 Reu.312l7l Page 9 of 9 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 818 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) COLTIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.collierpov.net C-auuty 28OO NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 .23912s2-24oo FAx: (239) 252-6358 (titll.. il'applicable) of (company. Il applicable), su'ear or aflirm under oath, that I am the (date) by (type of identification) as identification I.(print namc). as (choose one) o$ner _ applicant _ contract purchaser _ and that l. I have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and b impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result ofany action app|oved by the Countv in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code: 2. All answers to the questions in this applicatioh and any sketches, data o[ othcr supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part ofthis application are honest and true; 3. I have authorized the stall of Collier County to enter upon the propeny during normal working houls tbr the purpose ofinvestigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property will be tmnsferred. conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposcd by the approved action. 5. We/l authorize to act as our/my representative in any matters rcgarding this petition including I though 2 above. . lf lhe applicanl is a corpot'alion, then il is us ally execuled by lhe corp. pres. or r. pres. .lftheapplicanlisdLimiledLidbilityConpany(L.L.C.)orLinitedCompahy(L.C.),thehthedocttmentsshouldtypicallybe sighed by lhe Company's "Managing Member." . f the applicanl is a pa nerchip, then typically a pattner con sign on behalf of the partnership. . lf the applicaht is a limited pat lnership, lhen the general porthet ,hust sign dnd be identifed as the "general po ner" of lhe ndhed parthership. . lf the applicant is a tt'usl, lheh lhey musl include lhe truslee's name andthewords "as hwstee". . ln eoch instqnce, fitst determine lhe dpplicdhl's stal s, e-g-, inditidual, corporate, lrust, parlnership, and then use lhe appropriatc lormat lor that ownership Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I haye read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and lhat the facts stated in it are true. SiEnature Date STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing instrument was sworn to (or affirmed) and subscribed before me on (name of person providing oath or affirmation), as is personally known to me or who has produced STAI\IP/SEAL cn0&coA-0011s\|55 Rev.3l2l71 Signature of Notary Public Page 6 of 9 AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 819 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) t C.ounw 28OO NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (2391 2s2-24OO Pre-Application Meeting Sign-ln Sheet PL #: Collier County Contact lnformation : Review Discipline Phone Email I Craig Brown Environmental Review 252-254A CraigBrown@colliergov.net Ef David Anthony Environmental Review 252-2497 davidanthony@colliergov.net ! Summer Araque Environmental Review 252-6290 summerbrownaraque@colliergov.net A steve aaluch, P.r Transportation Planning 252-2367 StephenBaluch@colliergov.netxLaurie Beard Transportation Pathways Lauriebeard@colliergov.net tr Rachel Beasley Zoning Services 252-8202 rachelbeasley@colliergov.net !Marcus Berman County Surveyor 2s2-6885 MarcusBerman@colliergov.net t Mark Burtchin ROW Permitting 252 5765 markburtchin@colliergov.net George Cascio Utility Billing 252-5543 georgecascio@colliergov.net !Heidi Ashton Cicko Managing Asst. County Attorney 2s2-8773 heidiashton@colliergov.net fl 5ue Faulkner Comprehensive Planning 252-5175 suefaulkner@colliergov.net Ll oale rey North Naples Fire dalefey@colliergov.net { c"ula Fleishman lmpact Fee Administration 252-2924 paulafleishman@colliergov.net !Nancy Gundlach, AICP, PLA Zoning Services 252-2484 nancygundlach@colliergov.net !Shar Hingson East Naples Fire District 687-5650 shingson @ccfco.org !/ John Houldsworth Engineering Services 252-5157 johnhouldsworth@colliergov. net ( roai Huches Transportation Pathways 252-5144 jodihughes@colliergov.net tr Alicia Humphries Site Plans Reviewer/ROW 252-2326 a liciahu m phries@ colliergov.n et !Eric lohnson, AICP,CFM Zoning Services 252-2937 ericjohnson@colliergov. net f- Marcia Kendall comprehensive Planning 252-2387 marciakendall@colliergov.net Stephen Lenber8er Environmental Review 252-2915 stevelenberger@colliergov.net {Garrett Louviere Stormwater 252-2526 garrettlouviere@colliergov.net [] Paulo Martins Utilities paulomartins@colliergov.net N Thomas Mastroberto Fire Safety 2s2-7348 Thomasmastroberto@colliergov.net I Jack McKenna, P.E Engineering Services 252-2911 jackmckenna@colliergov.net l l Matt McLean, P.E Principal Project Manager 2s2-4279 matthewmclean@colliergov.net Gilbert Moncivaiz Utility lmpact Fees 252-4275 gilbertmoncivaiz@colliergov.net Annis Moxam Addressing annismoxam@colliergov. net D Stefanie Nawrocki Planning and Zoning 252-23t3 Stefa n ieNawrocki@ colliergov. net . Jessica Huckeba 252-2315 JessicaHuckeba@colliergov.net Brandy otero Transit 2 5 2-5859 brandyotero@colliergov.net COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net Name 252-57A2 s97-3222 252-4285 252-5579 CAD Technician 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 820 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) et Qounty Additional Attendee Contact lnformation: 28OO NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FTORIDA 34104 l2t9l2s2-24O0 L. Bill Pancake North Naples Fire 597-3222 billpancake@colliergov.net . Brandi Pollard Utility lmpact fees 252-6231 brandipollard@colliergov.net x Fred Reischl, AlcP Zoning Services 252 4277 fredreischl@colliergov.net [. Brett Rosenblum, P.E Utility Plan Review 252-2905 brettrosenblu m @colliergov. net I Edwin Sanchez Fire Review 2s2-7577 edwinsanchez@colliergov.net - M ichael Sawyer Transportation Planning 252-2926 michaelsawyer@colliergov.net I corby schmidt, AlcP comprehensive Planning 252 2944 corbyschmidt@colliergov.net :l chris scott, AlcP Planning and Zoning 252-2460 chrisscott@colliergov.net f eeter shawinsky Architectural Review 252-8523 PeterShawinsky@colliergov.net fi oaniel Roman Utility Plan Review )s2-2s34 danielroman@colliergov.net Ellen Summers Planning and zoning 252-7032 EllenSummers@colliergov.net Scott Stone Assistant County Attorney 252-8400 scottstone@colliergov.net Hearing Examiner/CCPC 252-4446 markstrain@colliergov.net {Storm Gewirtz Stormwater 252-2434 stormgewirtz@colliergov.net y' uark rempleton Landscape 252-247 5 ma rktem p leton @ colliergov. net l- Jon walsh Building Review 252-2962 jonatha nwa lsh @ colliergov. net E David weeks, AlcP comprehensive PlanninB 2s2-2306 davidweeks@colliergov.net Kirsten Wilkie Environmental Review 252-5518 kirstenwilkie@colliergov.net y christine willoughby Planning and zoning 2s2-5148 ChristineWilloughby@colliergov.net Phone EmailRepresentingNa me ta31q1 (.-,lorrLlrn"4 @ coh rornc?l+,fuciTos# Lx.I4tft@ COTTIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net ! Mark Strain 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 821 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) AuclairClaudine Claudine.Auclair@colliercountyfl.gov Fri 7/14/2017 12:51 PM RE: Emailing -PRE-APP NOTES FOR PL20170002079 BeardLaurie <lauriebeard@colliergov.net>; WilloughbyChristine ChristineWilloughby@colliergov.net Good afternoon: Hope this helps: They can redevelop the Mobil Gas Station and have the following option: They take it down and are allowed up to 4,200 square feet of retail/service development including a new gas station. If they keep the existing gas station and car wash, they can only build another 3,100 square feet. So technically, they can take it down, build a 1,500 square feet new store for the gas station and still have 2,700 sq. ft. of other retail space available. They have to remain within the outparcels E and E-1. From: BeardLaurie Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2017 9:14 AM To: AuclairClaudine <ClaudineAuclair@colliergov.net> Subject: RE: Emailing -PRE-APP NOTES FOR PL20170002079 Claudine, Here is the agreement. Mobil is on outparcel E and E-1 looks to be part of the parking lot behind Mobil. (See pdf page 22 & 23) Pdf page 10 , see iii: (There is more language in the agreement, but this is the bulk of it) 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 822 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) It was actually PL2017-2079, not PL17-2979. I fixed it in the subject line. They showed us a layout but it isn’t attached in CityView. It was my understanding that they wanted to move the building to the back (west end) of the property and leave the pumps up front. Laurie Beard, Project Manager, PUD Monitoring Capital Project Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management Division 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, #103 Naples, FL 34104 239-252-5782 From: AuclairClaudine Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2017 7:57 AM To: ReischlFred <FredReischl@colliergov.net> Cc: WilloughbyChristine <ChristineWilloughby@colliergov.net>; BeardLaurie <lauriebeard@colliergov.net> Subject: RE: Emailing -PRE-APP NOTES FOR PL20170002979 Is that regarding the Mobil gas station? I worked on the Berkshire Built out Agreement and will have to look for it. Laurie, do you have more up-to-date information? If not, I will look at the Agreement when I can today. 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 823 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) From: ReischlFred Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2017 7:24 AM To: AuclairClaudine <ClaudineAuclair@colliergov.net> Cc: WilloughbyChristine <ChristineWilloughby@colliergov.net> Subject: RE: Emailing -PRE-APP NOTES FOR PL20170002979 Hi Claudine- Do you know the answer – or direct me to someone who can answer Kelly’s question? Thanks! Fred Reischl, AICP Principal Planner 239-252-4211 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 www.colliergov.net From: WilloughbyChristine Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2017 4:45 PM To: ReischlFred Subject: FW: Emailing -PRE-APP NOTES FOR PL20170002979 Fred, Could you possible help with this built out agreement for Berkshire? Christine Willoughby Senior Planner Development Review Division Growth Management Department How are we doing? Please CLICK HERE to fill out a Customer Survey. We appreciate your Feedback! From: Pearce, Kelly [mailto:kzublick@cphcorp.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2017 4:37 PM To: WilloughbyChristine <ChristineWilloughby@colliergov.net> Subject: RE: Emailing -PRE-APP NOTES FOR PL20170002979 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 824 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) Christine: One more question on this project: Can you tell me what the County considers as demo based on the Berkshire Lakes Built Out agreement? Does the entire building need to be demolished or can they take it down to the shell and reskin the building? Thank you. Kelly Pearce Project Coordinator CPH 2216 Altamont Avenue Fort Myers, FL 33901 (239) 332-5499 x 3206 Please note our e-mail address and website have changed New e-mail: kpearce@cphcorp.com New website: www.cphcorp.com From: Lockhart, Joshua (P.E.) Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2017 4:17 PM To: Pearce, Kelly Subject: FW: Emailing -PRE-APP NOTES FOR PL20170002979 Joshua D. Lockhart, P.E., LEED AP Vice President/Associate CPH 239.332.5499 ext 3203 E-mail: jlockhart@cphcorp.com Website: www.cphcorp.com From: WilloughbyChristine [mailto:ChristineWilloughby@colliergov.net] Sent: Friday, June 23, 2017 8:52 AM To: Lockhart, Joshua (P.E.) Subject: Emailing -PRE-APP NOTES FOR PL20170002979 Christine Willoughby Senior Planner Development Review Division Growth Management Department 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 825 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 826 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 827 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 828 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 829 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 830 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 831 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 832 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 833 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 834 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 835 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 836 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 10.02.03 - Requirements for Site Development, Site Improvement Plans and Amendments thereof A. Generally. 1. Purpose. The intent of this section is to ensure compliance with the appropriate land development regulations prior to the issuance of a building permit. This section is further intended to ensure that the proposed development complies with fundamental planning and design principles such as: consistency with the county's growth management plan; the layout, arrangement of buildings , architectural design and open spaces ; the configuration of the traffic circulation system, including driveways , traffic calming devices, parking areas and emergency access ; the availability and capacity of drainage and utility facilities; and, overall compatibility with adjacent development within the jurisdiction of Collier County and consideration of natural resources and proposed impacts on those resources. 2. Applicability. All development , except as identified in LDC section 10.02.03 A.3, is subject to the provisions of this section. a. No building permit or certificate of occupancy shall be issued except in compliance with the approved site development plan , site improvement plan, amendment thereof, or pursuant to an approved Early Construction Authorization permit. b. No final local development order shall be issued or renewed for any regulated development that would allow development or change in use in violation of the LDC. c. All final local development orders issued in violation of the LDC are deemed invalid, and shall not confirm or vest any development right or property interest on the owner/operator or regulated development . d. Violation of the terms identified in the approved site development plan, site improvement plan, and amendments thereof shall constitute a violation of the LDC. 3. Exemptions from Site Development Plans and Site Improvement Plans. While the following land use activities shall be exempt from the provisions of LDC section 10.02.03, they are not exempt from other provisions of the LDC such as, but not limited to, landscaping, tree removal, development standards, and the submission requirements attendant to obtaining temporary use and building permits, unless otherwise stated in subsection 10.02.03 A.3. a. Single-family detached and two-family housing structure(s) on a lot(s) of record except as otherwise provided at section 4.02.02 ( cluster development ). b. Townhouses developed on fee simple lots under individual ownership, provided that a fee simple townhouse plat is approved in accordance with the provisions of LDC subsection 10.02.04 B.2.a.4 c. Underground construction; utilities, communications and similar underground construction type activities. d. Accessory and ancillary facilities for a golf course such as restrooms, irrigation systems, pump-houses where an early work authorization has been entered into with the county except where a land alteration permit is required by the LDC. e. Construction trailers and storage of equipment and materials following issuance of a building permit for the use to which said activities are a function of, pursuant to LDC subsection 5.04.03. Model homes and sales centers, except as otherwise provided by LDC section 5.04.04. f. Project entryway signs, walls, and gates. g. Signage proposed for the project in conformity with LDC section 5.06.00, sign regulations and standards. h. Neighborhood parks , subject to the approval of a conceptual site plan depicting, on a 24″ by 36″ sheet, all site clearing; improvements, including fences and walls, playground 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 837 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) equipment, walkways, picnic areas, and play areas; and minimum Code landscaping (irrigation will not be required). For the purposes of review fees only, this plan shall be treated as a conceptual site development plan , and the applicable review fee shall apply. i. Minimum landscape buffering . Under certain circumstances with neighborhood parks , there may be underlying health, safety and welfare concerns that necessitate deviation from the buffering required in section 4.06.02. The County Manager or designee will determine, on a case-by-case basis, whether such deviation is necessary. This determination will be made upon a request for determination from the applicant , which must include all reasons that would justify t he deviation. The County Manager or designee will use factors including, but not limited to, the following when making a determination for deviation: (a) The geographic location of the neighborhood park ; (b) The effects that a lack of buffering will have on neighboring uses; and (c) The need to ensure that the public safety is maintained by providing law enforcement and other policing entities clear view of the activities occurring on the park premises. 4. Agricultural Exemptions. Due to its location or minimal impact on surrounding properties and probable minimal impacts under the site development plan review standards contained in section 10.02.03 B., standard application requirements as described in section 10.02.03 D., may be waived in part or in full by the County Manager or designee for agriculturally related development as identified in the permitted and accessory uses section of the rural agricultural zoning district; however, a site improvement plan as required by section 10.02.03 E. a ddressing the application requirements deemed necessary by the County Manager or designee shall be submitted to the Planning and Zoning Department for review and approval. 5. School Board ReviewExemption. a. School board review ("SBR") application contents. The SBR application submittal will be in accordance with section 10.02.03 of the Code, but will be accorded an expedited process as outlined in the Manual for County Consistency and Site Plan Reviews of educational facilities and ancillary plants , as may be amended by agreement between the Board of County Commissioners and the Collier County School Board. This document is available in the Records Room of the Community Development and Environmental Services Building. b. The expedited site plan for school board review , as referenced in section 10.02.03 A.3.a. of the Land Development Code, will consist of the following areas of review: i. Collier County Utilities Standards and Procedures, Ordinance No. 01 -57, as may be amended. In accordance with this Ordinance, the following requirements must be met: (a) That portion of the water and/or wastewater system that lies in the public rights- of-way or in County utility easements ("CUE") shall be conveyed to the Collier County Water/Sewer District prior to the issuance of the certificate of occupancy. (b) All water and wastewater systems shall be built in accordance with the Collier County Utility Technical Standards Manual in effect at the time a SBR Letter of Compliance is requested. (c) Chapters 3 and 10 of the code designed to protect local government water supply wellfields from land uses that may pollute shall apply. (d) Off-site improvements shall be in accordance with the current update of the Water and Wastewater Master Plan and m ust include any agreement necessary to assign the responsibility for the cost of upsizing said water and/or wastewater facilities. (e) The School District shall be responsible for all materials and/or real property required for the water and/or wastewater system. Any expansions and/or 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 838 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) renovations to existing school facilities shall require a review by the Collier County Engineering Services Department to determine the need for a change in meter sizing and additional grease traps. (f) South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) permits shall be submitted prior to the issuance of an SBR approval. ii. Compatibility review. The County will conduct a compatibility review that will take into account the Architectural and Site Design Standards contained within Section 5.05.08 of the LDC in effect at the time a SBR Letter of Compliance is requested and that pertain to issues of compatibility with surrounding uses, complementary patterns of development and mitigation of negative impacts, limited to compatibility issues, external sidewalks and pathway connections, lighting, dumpster location and screening and orientation of buildings and ancillary facilities. In addition, The Utility Billing and Customer Service ("UBCS") Department shall ascertain that there i s ample space for the trash dumpster(s) or compactor(s) and for the trash collection franchisee to maneuver trucks in and out of the space allowed for the dumpster(s) or compactor(s). With the exception of high school facilities, this compatibility review will be a courtesy review. For high school facilities, this will be a formal review process and is subject to the appeal process set forth in this section 10.02.03(A)(3)(c) of the Code in the event that the County denies the application based on non-compliance with the items listed in this paragraph. iii. Landscaping and buffering. . Chapter 4.06.00 of the Code in effect at the time a SBR Letter of Compliance is requested shall apply. The County Planning Staff will recommend an amendment to the code allowing administrative deviations from the landscaping and buffering standards for essential services such as Educational and ancillary plants . Specifically, the County will recommend flexibility in the regulations for projects where there will be joint use b y the County Department of Parks and Recreation and the School District. In the event that the BCC approves the recommended amendment, administrative deviations may be granted provided the School District can demonstrate that the intent of this section can be effectively accomplished without meeting the specific development standards. The reasons for deviations are set forth in this Chapter 10 of the code, but the deviation shall be in the format required by Section 5.05.08 of the code. iv. Environmental regulations for compliance with the Collier County GMP Conservation and Coastal Management Element in effect at the time a SBR Letter of Compliance is requested shall apply as follows: (a) On a site by site basis, County Staff will determine the necessit y for an environmental impact statement ("EIS") to be submitted. (b) The final SFWMD Environmental Resource Permit and all other agency permits for wetlands must be submitted prior to a determination that the SBR application is sufficient for review. (c) Submission of Protected Species Surveys and, if needed, wildlife management plans in accordance with the code and the GMP in effect at the time of the issuance of the SBR Letter of Compliance along with United States Fish and Wildlife Service ("USFWS") and the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission ("FFWCC") agency permits. (d) A site clearing plan must be submitted that shows the native vegetation areas to be preserved and identifies the upland/ wetlands preserve or protected species preserves. (e) The GMP and LDC section 3.05.07 requires schools to provide a set percentage for native vegetation preservation in the Rural Fringe and the Rural Lands. The 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 839 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) School Board must comply with the set percentages of native vegetation preservation. (f) An exotic vegetation Removal and Maintenance Plan must be submitted and approved prior to final SBR approval. All exotic vegetation shall be removed from the site of an Educational and ancillary plant prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. (g) All environmental documentation must be submitted prior t o a sufficiency determination on a SBR application. Failure to submit the required documentation will result in a determination of insufficiency and the formal review process will not commence until such documentation is received and the application is deemed sufficient for review. v. All State Fire Code regulations as they relate to the site plan and in effect at the time that a SBR Letter of Compliance is requested shall apply. The School District shall submit all building information necessary to determ ine site requirements including, but not limited to, fire flow requirements and fire sprinkler requirements. vi. Collier County Stormwater Management Policies as follows: (a) A Drainage Plan, signed and sealed by a Florida Professional Engineer must be submitted along with design calculations in order to determine the proposed development's effect on County maintained drainage facilities . (b) SFWMD permits must be submitted prior to a determination that the SBR application is sufficient for review. (c) Easements for drainage improvements and access to them must be submitted prior to SBR approval. When necessary, the School Board will supply additional drainage easement area when necessitated by increased capacity to accommodate the proposed development . (d) If any dedications of easements for drainage, maintenance, and/or access are required, all necessary documentation to record the easement (s) shall be provided to the County prior to approval of the SBR. Prior to the County's issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy, such easements shall be approved by the BCC and officially recorded. (e) All proposed development activities will be fully in compliance with the Interim Watershed Management regulations of LDC section 3.07.00. vii. Public educational plants and ancillary plants are deemed to be essential public services and as such are subject to a Capital Improvement Element ("CIE") review for a public facility adequacy analysis. viii. Minimum yard setback requirements shall be 50 feet from all property lines for principal structures and 25 feet from all property lines for any accessory structures including portable classrooms. ix. Off-Site Impacts. In accordance with Section 6 of the Interlocal Agreement for Public School Facility Planning, the School District and the County will jointly determine the need for, and timing of, on-site and off-site infrastructure improvements in conjunction with the determination of the consistency of the site location with the GMP and the code, and will enter into a written agreement at the preapplication stage, as to the timing and location, and the entity or entities responsible for the cost, construction, operation and maintenance of the required improvements. In reaching a determination regarding responsibility for improvements, the parties will be guided as follows: (a) The School District shall be responsible for off-site improvements that are determined to be necessary to mitigate the off-site impacts of the educational plant or ancillary plant . The improvements shall be constructed by the School 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 840 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) Board at the School District's expense, unless the School District requests otherwise in writing and the County determines and agrees otherwise in writing. The School District shall not be required to pay more than its proportionate share of the cost of the off -site improvements necessitated by the educational plant or ancillary plant . Off-site improvements include, but are not necessarily limited to, the widening of adjacent roadways and the infrastructure relevant to same when necessitated to accommodate buses (if needed); construction of re quired deceleration turn lane(s) at ingress(es) and egress(es) points and at any intersections within the immediate vicinity of the school site which are adversely impacted as a direct result of the same; and any other improvements determined to be necessary by Collier County Transportation Services Division and the Public Utilities Division. (b) Turn Lanes. The School District will be responsible for turn lane improvements adjacent to and/or in the vicinity of a site, including the cost and construction of same. Necessary turn lane improvement(s) determined by Collier County Transportation Staff shall be in place prior to issuance of the first permanent certificate of occupancy. When said turn lane improvement(s), whether left turn lane(s) or right turn lane(s), are determined to be necessary, right-of-way and/or compensating right-of-way shall be provided in conjunction with said improvement(s), as determined by Collier County Transportation Staff. All turn lane design criteria used shall be in accordance with the minimum standards as adopted by the Florida Department of Transportation ("FDOT") Design Standards as required by Chapter 316, Florida Statutes, as may be amended. The turn lane queue length determinations shall be in accordance with the criteria /calculations of Chapter 17 within the Highway Capacity Manual. In conducting the aforementioned criteria/calculations the length of school buses must be considered to adequately address the turn lane queue length determinations. (c) Sidewalks . As part of the SBR process, the School Board and the County will develop a sidewalk plan which delineates the sidewalks that are necessary in and around the project to establish the most direct connection to an existing network of sidewalks . The School Board shall collect funds through school impact fees to provide for the development of these sidewalks as delineated in the sidewalk plan. The School Board shall provide funds from these impact fees to the County. The County will be responsible for the timing, cost, construction, and maintenance of such sidewalks . (d) The School District shall be responsible for the costs of any and all traffic signal(s) constructed due to and/or as a result o f the impacts from an educational plant or ancillary plant , when it is determined to be warranted and approved by Collier County Transportation Staff. When warranted, upon the completion of the installation, inspection, burn-in period, and final approval/acceptance of the traffic signal(s), the traffic signal(s) will be turne d over to the County, and will then be operated and maintained by the County Transportation and Operations Department. Any negotiations relevant to "fair share" payment(s), or reimbursement(s), from any and all other neighboring property owner(s), that dir ectly benefit from the installation of the traffic signal(s) will be determined based upon percentage of usage and impact. (e) All traffic control devices and design criteria used sha ll be in accordance with the minimum standards and any amendments thereto as adopted by the FDOT, as required by Chapter 316, Florida Statutes. (f) All traffic speed limit postings shall be in accordance with the minimum standards and any amendments thereto as adopted by the FDOT, and the Speed Zoning Manual as adopted by the FDOT and as required by Chapter 316, Florida Statutes. 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 841 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) (g) The design of all transportation related improvements shall comply with the minimum standards and any amendments thereto as adopted by the FDOT, and as required by Chapter 316, Florida Statutes. (h) Any off-site improvements to be constructed by the School District, even though not required by the County, shall be subject to review by the Collier County Transportation Staff prior to construction to assure compliance with County regulations. (i) In the event the School District proposes to expand an existing school site, Collier County Transportation Staff shall make its recommendations as to improvements required to mitigate the off-site transportation impacts, but only as they related to such expansion. c. School board review ("SBR") process. The SBR for School Board projects shall be reviewed under the following expedited process: i. The SBR application will be reviewed only as to the criteria set forth in section 10.02.03 A.3.a. ii. The SBR application submittal must be in accordance with section 10.02.03 of the Code, but only as to those submittal requirements which are consistent with the review criteria set out in section 10.02.03 A.3. iii. The parties will develop a checklist that defines the items to be submitted for a SBR review application. iv. Prior to commencing construction or site preparation, the School District shall request a pre-application meeting with the County. The County will schedule a pre-application meeting with the School District within 3 weeks of a request being submitted to the County. (a) The County will review the development proposal for compliance with the Letter of Consistency. (b) The parties will discuss and enter into a written agreement as to the timing and location and the entity or entities responsible for the cost, construction, operation and maintenance of the required off-site improvements. Any requirement that the BCC approve this written agreement at a public hearing is not a prerequisite to the School Board's ability to proceed with any County review that may be required by the code or the interlocal agreement. v. At least 120 days before commencing construction or site preparation, the School Board shall submit the SBR plan for the proposed educational plant or ancillary plant to the County for SBR approval. (a) The County will have 14 days to determine whether the submittal is complete and sufficient. If the application package is not sufficient for review, the County will request additional information from the School District. (b) Once the application package is sufficient, the County shall have 90 days to complete the review and issue a Letter of Compliance. The 90 days ma y be extended upon agreement of the County and the School District. Once an affirmative decision has been rendered, the School District may obtain building permits and commence construction. (c) Failure by the County to issue a Letter of Compliance within 90 days after determining the application package is sufficient for review shall be considered an approval. However, if within the 90 days the County denies the application based on non-compliance with the relevant standards of the code, the SBR shall be considered denied and the School District is authorized to pursue an appeal. 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 842 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) vi. Letter of Compliance. After the expedited review and the County's determination of compliance with the terms of the Code and the interlocal agreement, the County Manager or his designee, or his designee, shall issue a Letter of Compliance, which shall evidence the County's approval of the SBR. In the event that there is disagreement as to the School District's compliance with any site plan requirement set forth in this section, the County Manager or his designee shall, at the request of the School District Superintendent's designee, provide the County's determination and the basis of it in writing to the Superintendent's designee. Absent further successful negotiation on the issues, the School District shall be authorized to appeal the decision of the County Manager or his designee as described in the Appeals process below. vii. The parties agree that the School District shall not request reviews and that County review is not requested or required for the following: (a) The placement of temporary or portable classroom facilities; or (b) Proposed renovation or construction on existing school sites, with the excepti on of construction that: (i) changes the primary use of a facility; (ii) includes a stadium; (iii) results in a greater than 5 percent increase in K-12 student capacity; or (iv) encroaches upon the established setbacks as set forth in this Agreement. viii. Should the School Board place temporary or portable classrooms on a site, the School Board will supply additional data to the Fire Code Office for review pursuant to Rule 4A-58, Florida Administrative Code. In addition, the School Board will sup ply the Public Utilities Division with additional data on temporary a nd portable classroom facilities relative to concurrency issues related to water and sewer capacity and to the proper sizing of water meters and grease traps. No other reviews will be req uired for temporary or portable classroom facilities. ix. SBR and consistency review Fees. The County will develop a review fee for the processing of the SBR and consistency review applications submitted by the School Board. The School Board will pay standard County review fees for all other related project review services. x. Appeals. In the event that the County denies the application based on non -compliance with relevant standards of the code and the interlocal, or in the event that the Superintendent's designee and the County Manager or his designee disagree regarding the interpretation of the code provisions, the School District may request an appeal to the BCC. However, appeals regarding issues pertaining to the Fire Code will be made to the Board of Appeals and Adjustments under the established procedures for this Board. (a) The request for appeal shall be filed in writing with the County Manager or his designee and must state the basis for the appeal accompanied by any pertinent information, exhibits and other backup information in support of the appeal. (b) The BCC shall hold an advertised public hearing on the appeal and must consider the decision of the County Manager or his designee, the position of the School District and public testimony. If the BCC upholds the decision of the County Manager or his designee, the School District will then be authorized to pursue any legally available action or remedy to resolve this matter. If the BCC supports the position of the School District, the BCC will direct the County Manager or his designee, or his designee, to issue a Letter of Compliance that is consistent with the findings and conclusions made by the BCC at the appeal hearing. 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 843 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) d. Consistency review. The following process will be followed with respect to future educational plant and ancillary plant sites, prior to acquisition, for both the determination of consistency with the Collier County GMP locational criteria and whether the Plant is a permitted use, conditional use , or prohibited use in the zoning district on the site. Consistency with all other Elements of the GMP will be reviewed during the aforementioned SBR process. i. The consistency review will be conducted as follows: (a) Prior to the purchase of a site for an Educational or ancillary plant , the school district will request a pre-application meeting with the County. (b) The County will schedule a pre-application meeting with the School District within 3 weeks of a request being submitted to the County. (c) The County will review the proposed site for consistency with the FLUE, GGAMP, IAMP, as well as the LDC and fundamental planning and design principles including compatibility with surrounding uses, complimentary pattern of development , landscaping and buffer ing concerns, stormwater management, configuration of the traffic circulation systems, cons ideration of natural resources and mitigation of on-site and off-site negative impacts. The County will provide a consistency determination based only on the locational criteria of the FLUE and whether the Plant is a permitted use, conditional use or prohibited use in the zoning district on the site. Consistency with all other Elements of the GMP will be determined during the SBR Review process. The following additional information will be submitted to determine major issues that may affect site feasibility: (i) Land Use. A general location map showing surrounding development with the property outlined, a recent aerial of the site showing boundaries, source and date and a map and summary table of existing land uses and zoning within a radius of 300 feet from the boundaries of the subject property. (ii) Future Land Use Designation. A map of the subject property designating each use, such as elementary, middle, or high school and whether such use includes a stadium, with acreage tables for each land use designation. (iii) Environmental. A recent aerial and summary table of native habitats and soils occurring on the site; a table of Federal and State listed plant and animal species known to occur on the site and/or known to inhabit biological communities similar to the site. (iv) Growth Management. Identification of any Area of Critical State Concern and development of Regional Impact. (v) Timing and Impact of development . Indication of whether the proposed site is intended for inclusion in the School Board's capital plan projection and if so, identification of the year. (vi) Public Facilities and Transportation. The School Board will indicate the proposed existing level of service Standards (LOS) and the School Board's provider and method of treatment for potable water and sanitary sewer services, Arterial and collector roads , drainage and solid waste facilities. Where applicable, service availability letters will also be provided. The School Board will provide a map detailing the location of existing services and public utilities that will served the proposed site. (vii) The School Board will identify any flood zone, wellfield, traffic congestion boundary, coastal management boundary and high noise contours which relate to the proposed site. 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 844 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) (d) Within 45 days of the submission of the information outlined in Section 10.02.03 A.3.d. i.(c) of this Code, the County will provide written comments and recommendations to the School District along with a determination of the site's consistency with the GMP locational criteria and LDC zoning districts. Necessary on-site and off-site improvements will be identified for these sites and the parties responsible for these improvements to the extent this can be determined during this locational consistency review . (e) Letter of Consistency. After the County review, the County Manager or his designee, or his designee, shall issue a Letter of Consistency for the GMP locational criteria and whether the Plant is a permitted use, conditional use or prohibited use in the zoning district on the site, which shall evidence the County's determination of consistency as required by Section 1013.33(11) Florida Statutes. (f) After the County has determined that the site is consistent with the GMP locational criteria and LDC zoning districts, the School District shall have up to 1 year to acquire the site. Once the site is acquired, the site shall be deemed to remain consistent regardless of later changes to either the GMP or LDC. (g) After the School District acquires the site and provides the necessary documentation for the County to initiate an amendment to the GMP, the County and School District will enter into a written agreement as part of the pre - application process detailed in section 10.02.03 A.3.c.iv.(6) of the code, as to the timing and location, and the entity or entities responsible for construction, operation and maintenance of the required improvements. B. Standards for Site Development and Site Improvement Plans. The County Manager or designee shall review and consider all site development plans and site improvement plans in accordance with the following standards: 1. Statements regarding ownership and control of the property and the development as well as sufficiency of conditions regarding ownership and c ontrol, use and permanent maintenance of common open space , common facilities, conservation/preservation areas, or common lands to ensure the preservation of such lands and facilities will not become a future liability of the county. 2. Development compliance with all appropriate zoning regulations and the growth management plan. The ingress and egress to the proposed development and its improvements, vehicular and pedestrian safety, separation of vehicular traffic from pedestrian and other traffic, traf fic flow and control, traffic calming devices, provision of services and servicing of utilities and refuse collection, and access in the case of fire or catastrophe, or other emergency. Notwithstanding the requirement to comply with the foregoing provisions, the depiction on a PUD master plan or description of access or location of access points in a PUD ordinance, does not authorize or vest access to the major road system. The location, design, capacity, or routing of traffic for any specific access point will be determ ined by, and must comply with, the regulations for site development in effect at the time of site development plan approval. 3. The location and relationship of parking and loading facilities to thoroughfares and internal traffic patterns within the proposed development , considering vehicular and pedestrian safety, traffic flow and control, access in case of fire or catastrophe, screening and landscaping. 4. Adequacy of recreational facilities and open spaces considering the size, location, and development of these areas with regard to adequacy, effect on adjacent and nearby properties as well as uses within the proposed development , and the relationship to community-wide open spaces and recreation facilities. 5. Adequacy of the proposed landscape screens and buffers considering preservation of the development's internal land uses as well as compatibility with adjacent land uses. 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 845 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) applicant's engineer shall provide a completion certificate as to the improvements, together with all applicable items referenced in LDC section 10.02.05 B.2. Upon a satisfactory inspection of the improvements, a certificate of occupancy may then be issued. F. Site plan with deviations for redevelopment projects. 1. Purpose. A site plan with deviations shall provide a means for a redevelopment project to seek dimensional deviations, excluding height, architectural deviations, and deviations from site features, such as but not limited to, landscaping, parking, and buffers, from the standards established in the LDC when the passing of time has rendered certain existing buildings, structures or site features nonconforming . 2. Applicability. A site plan with deviations may be requested for the redevelopment of a site which meets the criteria for a site development plan , site development plan amendment or a site improvement plan as established in LDC section 10.02.03. Except for the requested deviations, the site development plan or site improvement plan shall comply with LDC section 10.02.03. For purposes of this section, "Redevelopme nt" shall mean the renovation, restoration, or remodeling of a building or structure , or required infrastructure, in whole or in part, where the existing buildings , structures or infrastructure were legally built and installed. 3. Application. The Administrative Code shall establish the process and submittal requirements for a site plan with deviations for redevelopment projects application. a. Requested deviations shall be clearly delineated and justified in the petition. Project enhancements to offset or minimize the deviations shall also be clearly stated. b. Projects subject to the provisions of LDC section 5.05.08 shall submit architectural drawings that are signed and sealed by a licensed architect registered in the State of Florida. c. The site construction plans shall be signed and sealed by the applicant's professional engineer, licensed to practice in the State of Florida. d. The landscaping plans shall be signed and sealed by the applicant's landscape architect, registered in the State of Florida. e. The survey shall be signed and sealed by the applicant's professional surveyor and mapper, registered in the State of Florida. 4. Staff review and recommendation. Based upon evaluation of the factors set forth in LDC section 10.02.03.F.8, County Staff shall prepare a report containing their review findings and a recommendation of approval, approval with conditions, or denial. 5. Public notice. Public notice of the hearing shall be as required by the LDC section 10.03 .06 Q and Chapter 6 of the Administrative Code. 6. Public hearing. The Hearing Examiner shall hold at least one public quasi-judicial hearing to review the proposed site plan with deviations. a. Review. The Hearing Examiner shall hear the petition following receipt of the staff report and application by the Office of the Hearing Examiner. At the public hearing, the Hearing Examiner shall consider the applicant's justification for the requested deviations, the staff report, the standards of approval and any other relevant testimony and evidence. b. Decision. The Hearing Examiner shall render a decision to approve, approve with conditions, or deny the requested deviations within 30 days of the public hearing. If approved, or approved with conditions, the decision shall specifically note the deviations and the basis for their approval. A decision by the Hearing Examiner shall be rendered prior to the issuance of the approval letter by the County Manager or designee for the site plan. 7. Standards for approval. The petition shall be reviewed for consistency with the following standards: 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 846 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) a. Land uses and densities within the development shall be consistent with the permitted and approved conditional uses in the zoning district. b. The proposed development is consistent with the Growth Management Plan. c. The development shall have a beneficial effect both upon the area in which it is proposed to be established and upon the unincorporated area as a whole. d. The total land area within the development and the area devoted to each functional portion of the development shall be adequate to serve its intended purpose. e. Streets, utilities, drainage facilities, recreation areas, sizes and yards, architectural features, vehicular parking and loading facilities, sight distances, landscaping a nd buffers shall be appropriate for the particular use involved. f. Visual character of the project shall be equal or better in quality than that required by the development standards for the zoning district. The visual character of the project shall be better in quality than the existing project before redevelopment and after it was first permitted. g. Areas proposed for common ownership shall be subject to a reliable and continuing maintenance guarantee. h. Deviations shall be clearly delineated in the petition and shall be the minimum required to achieve the goals of the project and comply with these standards. i. The petitioner has provided enhancements to the development . j. Approval of the deviation will not have an adverse effect on adjacent properties. 8. Timeframe. Time limits for site plans will be pursuant to LDC section 10.02.03 H. G. Amendments and insubstantial changes. Any proposed change or amendment to a previously approved site development plan shall be subject to review and approval by the County Manager or designee. Upon submittal of a plan clearly illustrating the proposed change, the County Manager or designee shall determine whether or not it constitutes a substantial change. In the event the County Manager or designee determines the change is substantial, the applicant shall be required to follow the review procedures set forth for a new site development plan . 1. Site development plan amendments (SDPA). A substantial change, requiring a site development plan amendment, shall be defined as any change which substantially affects existing transportation circulation, parking or building arrangements, drainage, landscaping, buffering, identified preservation/conservation areas and other site development plan considerations. 2. Site development plan insubstantial changes (SDPI). The County Manager or designee shall evaluate the proposed change in relation to the following criteria; for purposes of this section, the insubstantial change procedure shall be acceptable where the following conditions exist with respect to the proposed change: a. There is no South Florida Water Management District permit, or letter of modification, needed for the work and there is no major impact on water management as determined by the Engineering Services Director. b. There is no new access proposed from any public street , however minimal right-of-way work may be permitted as determined by the Transportation Planning Director. c. There is no addition to existing buildings (air-conditioned space) proposed, however a maximum area of 300 square feet of non-air-conditioned space used for storage, or to house equipment, will be permitted. d. There is no proposed change in building footprint or relocation of any building on site beyond that needed to accommodate storage areas as described in LDC section 10.02.03 G.2.c, above. 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 847 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 5.05.05 - Facilities with Fuel Pumps A. The purpose of this section is to ensure that facilities with fuel pumps do not adversely impact adjacent land uses, especially residential land uses. The high levels of traffic, glare, and intensity of use associated with facilities with fuel pumps , particularly those open 24 hours, may be incompatible with surrounding uses, especially residential uses. Therefore, in the interest of protecting the health, safety, and general welfare of the public, the following regulations shall apply to the location, layout, drainage, operation, landscaping, parking, and permitted sales and service activities of facilities with fuel pumps . B. Site design requirements. 1. Table of site design requirements: Minimum dimensions: Site Standards Minimum lot area (sq. ft.) 30,000 Minimum lot width (ft.) 150 Minimum lot depth (ft.) 180 Separation from adjacent facilities with fuel pumps (ft.) (based on distance between nearest points) 500 Minimum setbacks , all structures : Front yard (ft.) Side yard (ft.) Rear yard (ft.) 50 40 40 2. Waiver of separation requirements. a. The BZA may, by resolution, grant a waiver of part or all of the minimum separation requirements set forth herein if it is demonstrated by the applicant and determined by the BZA that the site proposed for development of a facility with fuel pumps is separated from another facility with fuel pumps by natural or man-made boundaries, structures , or other features which offset or limit the necessity for such minimum distance requirements. The BZA's decision to waive part or all of the distance requirements shall be based upon the following factors: i. Whether the nature and type of natural or man-made boundary, structure, or other feature lying between the proposed establishment and an existing facility with fuel pumps is determined by the BZA to lessen the impact of the proposed facility with fuel pumps . Such boundary, structure , or other feature may include, but is not limited to, lakes, marshes, nondevelopable wetlands , designated preserve areas, canals, and a minimum of a 4-lane arterial or collector right-of-way . 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 848 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) ii. Whether the facility with fuel pumps is only engaged in the servicing of automobiles during regular, daytime business hours, or, if in addition to or in lieu of servicing, the facility with fuel pumps sells food, gasoline, and other convenience items during daytime, nighttime, or on a 24 hour basis. iii. Whether the facility with fuel pumps is located within a shopping center primarily accessed by a driveway , or if it fronts on and is accessed directly from a platted road right-of-way . iv. Whether the granting of the distance waiver will have an adverse impact on adjacent land uses, especially residential land uses. b. The Administrative Code shall establish the submittal requirements for a facility with fuel pumps waiver request. The request for a facility with fuel pumps waiver shall be based on the submittal of the required application, a site plan, and a written market study analysis which justifies a need for the additional facility with fuel pumps in the desired location. c. Additional conditions. The BZA shall have the right to add additional conditions or requirements to its approval of a distance waiver request in order to insure compatibility of the facility with fuel pumps with the surrounding area and the goals and objectives of the GMP. C. Building architecture, site design, lighting, and signage requirements. 1. Building architecture shall meet the requirements of LDC section 5.05.08 in addition to the following requirements: a. All structures on-site shall be of a consistent design and color scheme. b. Canopy standards: i. Columns must be at least eighteen (18) inches wide on all sides. ii. Under-canopy lights must be fully recessed. iii. Canopies must not be higher than sixteen (16) feet clear. iv. Canopy standards. a) Canopy roofs shall be consistent with the architectural design and features of the principal structure . b) The eave fascia of the canopy shall be of one (1) color, consistent with the predominant color and scheme of the principal structure . Color accent banding on canopy structures is permitted through the Deviations and Alternative Compliance process established in LDC section 5.05.0 8. c) One of the following shall be applied to the canopy roof or eave fascia: i) Canopy roofs shall provide a slope ratio of 4:12 or higher. A minimum of two roof-edge or parapet line changes are required and shall create three distinct sections. One roof edge or parapet line change shall be provided for every 75 linear feet of the canopy length. Each change shall be a minimum of 20 percent of the canopy length. ii) The eave fascia shall have a projection or recess with a minimum depth of three feet, and a minimum total width of 20 percent of the eave fascia length. One change is required for every 75 linear feet of the canopy length. v. See canopy signage standards in LDC section 5.05.05 C.4, below. 2. Site design standards. a. A dumpster enclosure shall be provided as established in LDC section 5.03.04 and integrated with the design and color scheme of the facility with fuel pumps . 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 849 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) b. Trash receptacle(s) shall be provided at a convenient location on -site to facilitate litter control. c. All restrooms and ATMs shall be located inside the principal structure . 3. Lighting standards. a. All light fixtures shall be directed away from neighboring properties. b. On-site light fixtures shall not exceed a height greater than twenty (20) feet above finis hed grade . c. On-site luminaries shall be of low level, indirect diffuse type, and shall be between a minimum average of 1.5 foot-candles and a maximum average of 5 foot-candles. d. All light fixtures shall be full cutoff with flat lenses. e. Lighting located underneath the canopy shall be recessed, of indirect diffuse type, and designed to provide light only to the pump island areas located underneath said canopy. f. Under-canopy luminance shall be between a minimum average of 5 foot -candles and a maximum average of 20 foot-candles. 4. Signage for facilities with fuel pumps . The following are the only signs allowed in facilities with fuel pumps and convenience stores with fuel pumps . a. Window, Wall, and other signs: As allowed in LDC section 5.06.00. b. An illuminated corporate logo with a maximum area of 12 square feet shall be allowed on a canopy face which is adjacent to a dedicated street or highway. Otherwise accent lighting and back lighting are prohibited on canopy structures . Color accent banding on canopies may be approved as established in LDC section 5.05.05 C.1.b.iv.(b), above. c. One ground sign shall be permitted for each site and shall be placed within a 200 square foot landscaped area. Height is limited so that the top edge of the sign face is less than eight feet above grade . Maximum permitted area 60 square feet. Said sign shall be consistent with the color scheme and architectural design of the principal structure . d. Signage is prohibited above fuel pumps . D. Supplemental standards for facilities with fuel pumps within 250 feet of residential property. Facilities with fuel pumps shall be subject to the following standards when located within 250 feet of residentially zoned or residentially developed properties, hereinafter referred to as "residential property," as measured from the property line of the facility with fuel pumps to the residential property line. However, a facility with fuel pumps shall be exempt from LDC section 5.05.05 D when it is separated from residential property by a minimum of 100 feet of designated preserve area that is 80 percent opaque and at least 12 feet in height within one year, or a minimum 4-lane arterial or collector right-of-way . 1. Setbacks . All structures shall provide a minimum 50-foot front, side, and rear yard setback from residential property line(s). 2. Landscaping and masonry wall standards. a. Facility with fuel pumps sites shall be separated from residential property by a thirty (30) foot wide landscape buffer and an architecturally designed masonry wall. The masonry wall shall be eight (8) feet in height, centered within the landscape buffer , and shall use materials similar in color, pattern, and texture to those utilized for the principal structure . The masonry wall shall be located on top of a berm . The berm shall be constructed and maintained at a height of three (3) feet and a maximum slope of 3:1. The berm shall be planted with ground cover. b. Landscaping shall be required on both sides of the masonry wall. On the resid ential property wall side, a hedgerow consisting of #10 shrubs, spaced three (3) feet on center, 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 850 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) and four (4) feet high at planting and five (5) feet high within one year shall be provided. In addition, a row of canopy trees spaced thirty (30) feet on cent er, and ten (10) feet in height at planting are required. On the facility with fuel pumps wall side, a row of canopy trees, spaced thirty (30) feet on center, and twelve (12) feet in height at planting are required. A hedgerow consisting of #10 shrubs, spaced three (3) feet on center, and four (4) feet high at planting and five (5) feet high within one year shall be provided. Required canopy trees shall be staggered to accommodate the canopy trees on the residential property wall side. 3. Music, amplified sound, and delivery time standards. a. Music and amplified sound shall not be played in the fuel pump area between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. b. Music and amplified sound shall not be audible from the residential property line. c. Deliveries shall be prohibited between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. in the area located between the neighboring residential property and the facility with fuel pumps . 4. Lighting standards. a. On-site lighting. i. All light fixtures shall be directed awa y from neighboring properties. ii. On-site light fixtures within fifty (50) feet of residential property shall not exceed a height greater than fifteen (15) feet above finished grade . Light fixtures elsewhere shall not exceed a height greater than twenty (20) feet above finished grade . iii. All light fixtures shall be full cutoff with flat lenses. iv. On-site luminaries shall be of low level, indirect diffuse type, and shall be between a minimum average of 1.5 foot-candles and a maximum average of 5 foot-candles. v. Illumination shall not exceed: a) 0.5 foot-candles at all residential property lines; and b) 0.2 foot-candles at ten (10) feet beyond all residential property lines. b. Under-canopy lighting. i. Lighting located underneath the canopy shall be recessed, of indirect diffuse type, and designed to provide light only to the pump island areas located underneath said canopy. ii. Under canopy luminance shall be between a minimum average of 5 foot -candles and a maximum average of 20 foot-candles. 5. Dumpster enclosures. At a minimum, the dumpster enclosure shall be located at a distance from residential property equal to the setback of the principal structure from residential property. 6. See LDC section 5.05.11 for car washes, vacuums, and com pressed air stations abutting residential zoning districts. E. The following landscape requirements are in addition to the requirements of section 4.06.00 Landscaping and Buffering. 1. Right-of-way buffer landscaping : a. Landscaping adjacent to rights-of-way external to the development project shall be located within a landscape buffer easement which is a minimum of twenty-five (25) feet in width. Water management swales shall not be located within these buffer areas; however, water management facilities such as underground piping shall be permitted. 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 851 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) b. An undulating berm with a maximum slope of 3:1 shall be constructed along the entire length of the landscape buffer . The berm shall be constructed and maintained at a minimum average height of three (3) feet. The berm shall be planted with ground cover (other than grass), shrubs, hedges, trees, and palms. c. The required trees and palms shall be clustered in double rows with a minimum of three (3) trees per cluster. Canopy trees shall be planted a maxim um of twenty (20) feet on center within a cluster. The use of palms within the right-of-way buffer shall be limited to landscaped areas adjacent to vehicular access points. Palms shall be planted in staggered heights, a minimum of three (3) palms per cluster, spaced at a maximum of eight (8) feet on center, with a minimum of a four (4) foot difference in height between each tree. Exceptions will be made for Roystonea spp. and Phoenix spp. (not including roebelenii) which may be planted one (1) palm per clus ter. A maximum distance of twenty- five (25) feet between all types of tree clusters shall be maintained (See Illustration 1 below). d. All of the trees shall be a minimum of fourteen (14) feet in height at the time of installation. Trees shall have a minimum of a three and one-half (3½) inch caliper at twelve (12) inches above the ground and a six (6) foot spread. At installation, shrubs shall be a minimum of ten (10) gallons, five (5) feet in height, with a three (3) foot spread, planted four (4) feet on center. 2. Landscaping adjacent to all other property lines: a. Landscaping adjacent to all other property lines shall comply with the requirements in LDC section 4.06.02. b. Curbing shall be installed and constructed, consistent with minimum code requi rements, between all paved areas and landscape areas. 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 852 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) Illustration 1. Facilities with Fuel Pumps R.O.W. Landscape Requirements F. Storage tanks shall be located below grade . G. There shall be no outside displays of products, stacking of tires, or other merchandise. H. No facility with fuel pumps shall have an entrance or exit for vehicles within 200 feet along the same side of a street as a school , public playground, child care center , church , hospital, public library, or any institution for dependents or for children, except where such property is in another block . I. Each facility with fuel pumps shall provide the necessary infrastructure and pre-wiring in order to provide the capabilities for generator service in case of emergencies. J. In addition to the retail dispensing of automobile fuels and oil, only the following services m ay be rendered and sales made, except as indicated: 1. Sales and servicing of spark plugs, batteries, distributors, and distributor parts. 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 853 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 2. Sales, mounting, balancing, and repair of tires and wheel alignments, but not recapping of tires. 3. Sales and replacement of water hoses, fan belts, br ake fluid, light bulbs, fuses, floor mats, wiper blades, grease retainers, wheel bearings, shock absorbers, mirrors, exhaust systems, and the like. 4. Provision of water, antifreeze, flushing of the cooling system, air conditioning recharge, and the like. 5. Providing and repairing fuel pumps and lines. 6. Minor motor adjustments not involving removal of the head or crankcase. 7. Greasing and lubrication. 8. Sales of cold drinks, candies, tobacco, and similar convenience goods for customers. 9. Provision of road maps and other information. 10. No mechanical work shall be allowed outside of the enclosed areas. 11. Oil drainage pits or appliances for such purpose or repair purposes shall be loc ated within a wholly enclosed building. 12. Uses permissible at a facility with fuel pumps do not include major mechanical and body work, straightening of frames or body parts, steam cleaning, painting, welding, storage of automobiles (except as expressly permitted in subsection 13. below), commercial garage as a n accessory use, or other work involving undue noise, glare, fumes, smoke, or other characteristics to an extent greater than normally found in such stations. A facility with fuel pumps is not a facility for the sale of automobile vehicles, a repair garage, a body shop, or a truck stop. 13. The temporary storage of vehicles shall be permitted if the vehicles are to be serviced at the facility with fuel pumps or if the vehicles have been towed by the facility with fuel pumps and are being held for servicing, for an insurance company, or for salvage. Any such vehicle(s), other than those vehicles serviced daily, shall be stored within an area surrounded by an opaque fence not less than six (6) feet high. Said vehicles shall not be stored longer than sixty (60) days. 14. Washing and polishing of automobiles and sale of automobile washing and polishing materials, but this only allows auto detailing as an accessory use . This provision does not allow carwashes except in those zoning districts where a carwash is a permitted use, and where such carwashes shall be subject to criteria specified in the zoning district. K. Exceptions: 1. The site design standards set forth in LDC section 5.05.05 B.1. (table) shall not apply to, nor render non-conforming, any existing facility with fuel pumps or any facility with fuel pumps within a PUD in which a specific architectural rendering and site p lan was approved as part of a rezoning action prior to July 5, 1998. 2. The site design standards set forth in LDC section 5.05.05 C. - J. or any other applicable development standard shall apply to existing facilities with fuel pumps pursuant to the provisions of 9.03.00 Nonconformities, and all other applicable sections of the Land Development Code. (Ord. No. 09-43, § 3.A; Ord. No. 10-23, § 3.JJ; Ord. No. 13-56, § 3.S; Ord. No. 15-46, § 2.B) 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 854 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 855 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 856 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 857 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 858 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 859 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 860 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 861 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 862 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 863 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 864 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 865 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 866 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 867 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 868 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 869 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 870 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 3200 HACKBERRY ROAD IRVING, TX 75063 Current Principal Place of Business: Current Mailing Address: 3200 HACKBERRY ROAD ATTN: CORP. INCOME TAX DEPT IRVING, TX 75063 US Entity Name: 7-ELEVEN, INC. DOCUMENT# 815881 FEI Number: 75-1085131 Certificate of Status Desired: Name and Address of Current Registered Agent: CORPORATE CREATIONS NETWORK INC. 11380 PROSPERITY FARMS RD #221E PALM BEACH GARDENS, FL 33410 US The above named entity submits this statement for the purpose of changing its registered office or registered agent, or both, in the State of Florida. SIGNATURE: Electronic Signature of Registered Agent Date Officer/Director Detail : I hereby certify that the information indicated on this report or supplemental report is true and accurate and that my electronic signature shall have the same legal effect as if made under oath; that I am an officer or director of the corporation or the receiver or trustee empowered to execute this report as required by Chapter 607, Florida Statutes; and that my name appears above, or on an attachment with all other like empowered. SIGNATURE: Electronic Signature of Signing Officer/Director Detail Date FILED Jan 30, 2019 Secretary of State 7979508036CC RANKIN GASAWAY SECRETARY, BY LYNNETTE PENALBERT, ATTORNEY-IN-FACT 01/30/2019 2019 FOREIGN PROFIT CORPORATION AMENDED ANNUAL REPORT No Title PRESIDENT, DIRECTOR, CEO Name DEPINTO, JOSEPH M Address 3200 HACKBERRY ROAD City-State-Zip:IRVING TX 75063 Title TREASURER Name SELTZER , DAVID L. Address 3200 HACKBERRY ROAD City-State-Zip:IRVING TX 75063 Title ASSISTANT SECRETARY, FRANCHISE SALES REP Name GOLDSMITH , JOSEPH Address 3200 HACKBERRY ROAD City-State-Zip:IRVING TX 75063 Title ASSISTANT SECRETARY, FRANCHISE SALES REP Name BYNES , MICHAEL Address 3200 HACKBERRY ROAD City-State-Zip:IRVING TX 75063 Title SVP, GC, SECRETARY Name GASAWAY , RANKIN Address 3200 HACKBERRY ROAD City-State-Zip:IRVING TX 75063 Title ASSISTANT SECRETARY, SR. DIRECTOR TRANSACTION TAX Name BAKER , JAMES C. Address 3200 HACKBERRY ROAD City-State-Zip:IRVING TX 75063 Title ASSISTANT SECRETARY, FRANCHISE SALES MANAGER Name QURESHI , ASIF Address 3200 HACKBERRY ROAD City-State-Zip:IRVING TX 75063 Title ASSISTANT SECRETARY, FRANCHISE SALES REP Name STEVENS , WINSTON (DOUG) Address 3200 HACKBERRY ROAD City-State-Zip:IRVING TX 75063 Continues on page 2 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 871 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) Title VP, FLORIDA ZONE MANAGER Name SUMMERS , JAMES ROBERT Address 3200 HACKBERRY ROAD City-State-Zip:IRVING TX 75063 Title VP MERGERS & ACQ. DEVELOPMENT Name WILLIAMS , IAN C. Address 3200 HACKBERRY ROAD City-State-Zip:IRVING TX 75063 Title VP, CONSTRUCTION, ENGINEERING & FACILITIES Name NACHTRAB , ERIC J. Address 3200 HACKBERRY ROAD City-State-Zip:IRVING TX 75063 Officer/Director Detail Continued : Title ASSISTANT SECRETARY, SR. DEVELOPMENT DIRECTORY Name DISTEL , GRANT Address 3200 HACKBERRY ROAD City-State-Zip:IRVING TX 75063 Title ASSISTANT SECRETARY, FRANCHISE SALES REP Name REINA , KATHRYN Address 3200 HACKBERRY ROAD City-State-Zip:IRVING TX 75063 Title REAL ESTATE MANAGER, FL ZONE Name BANTOS , CHARLES Address 3200 HACKBERRY ROAD City-State-Zip:IRVING TX 75063 Title DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS Name MERRELL , MICHELLE (ANDREA) Address 3200 HACKBERRY ROAD City-State-Zip:IRVING TX 75063 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 872 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) FFFRLOADING ZONESANTA BARBARA BLVD SITE PLANC05CALL 48 HOURSBEFORE YOU DIGIT'S THE LAW!DIAL 811SUNSHINE STATE ONE CALL OF FLORIDA, INC.Know what's below.Call before you dig.REVISED PER COUNTY COMMENTS.3 This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Cornelison Engineering & Design, Inc.(CED) shall be without liability to CED. Drawing name: P:\1509044 - 7-11, Santa Barbara Blvd, Naples\Cadd\Exhibits\8.5x11 - 7-11 NAPLES - SITE PLAN.dwg C05 Jul 21, 2019 2:27pm by: CraigCornelison REVISIONSNo.DATE SHEET NUMBERPROJECT NO.DATEDRAWN BY SCALE CHECKED BY DESIGNED BY AS NOTED PROJECT NAME CLIENTSHEET NAME ã FLORIDA PE NO: 3701 SANTA BARBARA BLVD., NAPLES, FL 34104 55433 CRAIG L. CORNELISON, P.E.09/27/181509044CLC ERV CLC VERTICAL CONSTR. MANAGEMENT 7-ELEVEN - NAPLES (SDP PL20180001683) 07/10/20197-21-19 NTS9.A.6.hPacket Pg. 873Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 874 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 875 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 876 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 877 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 878 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 879 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 880 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 881 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 882 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 883 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 884 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 885 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 886 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 887 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 888 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 889 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.hPacket Pg. 890Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 891 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 892 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 893 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 894 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 895 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 896 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.hPacket Pg. 897Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 898 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 899 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 900 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 901 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 902 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 903 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 904 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 905 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 906 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 907 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 908 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 909 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 910 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 911 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 912 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 913 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 914 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) October 18, 2019 Mr. C. James Sabo, AICP, Principal Planner Collier County Zoning Division 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 (239) 252-2708 Re: 7-Eleven #34816 3701 Santa Barbara Blvd., Naples Deviations for Redevelopment #DR PL20180001785 Dear Mr. Sabo: We are in receipt of comments dated August 22, 2019 regarding the above project and offer the following in response. LANDSCAPE REVIEW, Mark Templeton, marktempleton@colliergov.net; (239) 252-2475 Correction Comment 2: Please exclude the detailed landscape plan from this application. The detailed landscape plan will be reviewed at time of SDP. All that is requested for the DR application is the site plan labelling locations of deviations as well as a buffer exhibit for the East buffer to show the planting scheme with the existing trees to address this deviation. Since the North buffer is simply to reduce width, no exhibit or planting plan is needed. Since there are no deviations for the West buffer, no planting plan or exhibit is needed for this buffer. The deviation for the South buffer is just to allow encroachment. Since the required buffer plantings will be shown on SDP plans, no exhibit or landscape plan is needed to show these plantings. Rather than stating in the deviation for the South buffer that 1 tree will be added, staff recommends stating instead in the deviation that trees will be added as needed so that the maximum 25' spacing between the buffer trees is not exceeded. Rev. 3: Please show the location of the 8 existing oaks along the south that will be preserved. It appears that there is more than 25' between some of these trees based on aerial imagery. Please add language to the deviation that trees will be added as necessary to meet the 'B' buffer tree spacing requirement. Rev. 4: Please label the 8 trees on the plan that are to be preserved as “existing (indicated type of tree) to be preserved.” Please also indicate that the buffer described in deviation 3 is the South buffer. Response: As requested, the 8 trees on the deviation key sheet have been labeled as “existing (type of tree indicated) to be preserved.” In addition, the landscape buffer referred to in Deviation 3 has been corrected to state “south landscape buffer.” Please see the list of deviations and key sheet included with this submittal. Correction Comment 7: Please revise the deviation language to match the standard format. See also County Attorney comment #2. Rev. 4: Deviation 2 requests deviation from the width and the berm requirement of right of way buffer. Please also request a deviation from the requirement to have clusters of trees with spacing of trees in each cluster not exceeding 20' and spacing between clusters not exceeding 25 to instead allow existing trees to remain in a linear layout with clusters of new trees provided between existing trees. Please also reference the exhibit in this deviation. Response: As requested, Deviation 2 has been revised to include the above text in reference to the clusters of trees and their spacing. Please see the list of deviations and key sheet and the landscape deviations east buffer exhibit included with this submittal. 38039 Old 5th Avenue Zephyrhills, FL 33542 Tel. (813) 788-7835 Fax (813) 788-7062 www.cornelison-eng.com 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 915 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) Mr. C. James Sabo, Collier County Zoning Division October 18, 2019, Page 2 of 2 COUNTY ATTORNEY REVIEW, Heido Ashton-Cicko, heidiashton@colliergov.net; (239) 252-8773 Correction Comment 1: Miscellaneous Corrections: Please provide the names of the owners of 7-Eleven, Inc., a Texas corporation, for conflicts check for HEX or CCPC and BCC. Response: This comment was addressed on October 18, 2019 via email communication between Verdad Construction Services and Heidi Ashton. Please see attached copy of the email from Heidi. Correction Comment 3: Miscellaneous Corrections: Please provide your list of deviations on one sheet (without the justifications) and attach the deviation key. See my review comments dated 8-22-19 for requested changes. Response: As requested, the list of deviations has been revised to be one sheet and the justification language has been removed. Included with this submittal are: · Revised Deviations Letter with deviation key sheet · Revised Landscape East Buffer Exhibit · Copy of email dated 10/18/19 from Heidi Ashton If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, CORNELISON ENGINEERING & DESIGN, INC. Craig L. Cornelison, P.E. President clc:mac 1509044\Collier Co\2019-10-18_4th rd DR responses.docx 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 916 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) August 26, 2019 7-Eleven #34816 3701 Santa Barbara Boulevard, Naples, FL Parcel ID No. 23945007035 DR PL #20180001785 DEVIATIONS Deviation 1: LDC 4.06.02.C.4, Buffer Requirements Deviation #1 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.06.02.C.4, Buffer Requirements, which requires a 10' type 'D' buffer to instead allow a minimum of an 8’ landscape buffer along the north property line. Deviation 2: LDC 5.05.05.E, Right of Way Buffer Landscaping Deviation #2 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.05.05.E., Right of Way Buffer Landscaping, which requires landscaping adjacent to right of way external to the development project shall be located within a landscape buffer easement which is a minimum of twenty-five (25) feet in width; an undulating berm with a maximum slope of 3:1 shall be constructed and maintained at a minimum average height of three (3) feet to instead allow a 15’ landscape buffer with no undulating berm along the eastern property line. In addition, Deviation #2 seeks relief from the requirement to have clusters of trees with spacing of trees in each cluster not exceeding 20' and spacing between clusters not exceeding 25’ to instead allow existing trees to remain in a linear layout with clusters of new trees provided between existing trees. Please see the Landscape Deviations East Buffer Exhibit included with this submittal. Deviation 3: LDC 4.06.02.D.4, Sidewalks and Other Impervious Areas Must Not Occupy Any Part of a Required Buffer Deviation #3 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.06.02.D.4, Sidewalks and Other Impervious Areas Must Not Occupy Any Part of a Required Buffer, which requires sidewalks and other impervious areas must not occupy any part of a required alternative A, B, C, or D type buffer to instead allow the existing storage area structure to be located within the required south landscape buffer. Deviation 4: LDC Section 5.05.05.B.1, 40’ Side Yard Setback along North Property Line Deviation #4 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.05.05.B.1, 40’ Side Yard Setback along North Property Line, which requires site design requirements, Table 1, minimum setbacks, all structures: side yard (ft.) = 40’ (site standards), to instead allow a 22.5’± setback along the northern property line. Deviation 5: LDC Section 5.05.05.B.1, 40’ Side Yard Setback along South Property Line Deviation #5 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.05.05.B.1, 40’ Side Yard Setback along South Property Line, which requires site design requirements, Table 1, minimum setbacks, all structures: side yard (ft.) = 40’ (site standards), to instead allow a 16.8’± setback along the southern property line. 38039 Old 5th Avenue Zephyrhills, FL 33542 Tel. (813) 788-7835 Fax. (813) 788-7062 www.cornelison-eng.com 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 917 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 1 4 5 DEVIATION KEY SHEET DR PL #20180001785 Existing Oak - to be preserved Two existing Cypress - to be preserved Existing Oak - to be preserved Three existing Cabbage Palms - to be preserved Existing Oak - to be preserved Three existing Oak - to be preserved Existing Oak - to be preserved Existing Oak - to be preserved 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 918 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 919 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 920 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) August 26, 2019 7-Eleven #34816 3701 Santa Barbara Boulevard, Naples, FL Parcel ID No. 23945007035 DR PL #20180001785 DEVIATION JUSTIFICATIONS Deviation 1: LDC 4.06.02.C.4, Buffer Requirements Deviation #1 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.06.02.C.4, Buffer Requirements, which requires a 10' type 'D' buffer to instead allow a minimum of an 8’ landscape buffer along the north property line. Justification 1: The 7-Eleven #34816 project includes demolishing an existing Mobile gas station building and reconstruction of a new 3,058 sf 7-Eleven convenience store. The majority of the site including the existing canopy, car wash, parking, and drive aisles will remain. The project was approved for a building permit and site development plan on October 20, 1990 under SDP #90-192. A copy of the approved site development plan is included with this submittal. At the time of the original construction, a 5’ landscape buffer was required adjacent to rights of ways and interior property lines. The provided buffer width will vary from a minimum of 8’ to in excess of the required 10’, per the current code. To provide vehicular access around the existing canopy, the buffer cannot feasibly be increased beyond what currently exists. The proposed buffer will provide a minimum of 8’ type ’D’ buffer with 10’ height x 4’ spread trees spaced no more than 30 feet on center and a continuous 3 gallon double row hedge spaced 3’ on center of at least 24" in height at the time of planting and attaining a minimum of 30 inches in height in one year. By eliminating existing pavement, additional buffering/open space will be created along the northern property line. With the exception of the existing encroachment into the required buffer, the requirements of the LDC are met within the proposed buffer. There are no anticipated negative impacts as a result of granting this request to allow a minimum of an 8’ landscape buffer along the north property line. Deviation 2: LDC 5.05.05.E, Right of Way Buffer Landscaping Deviation #2 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.05.05.E., Right of Way Buffer Landscaping, which requires landscaping adjacent to right of way external to the development project shall be located within a landscape buffer easement which is a minimum of twenty-five (25) feet in width; an undulating berm with a maximum slope of 3:1 shall be constructed and maintained at a minimum average height of three (3) feet to instead allow a 15’ landscape buffer with no undulating berm along the eastern property line. In addition, Deviation #2 seeks relief from the requirement to have clusters of trees with spacing of trees in each cluster not exceeding 20' and spacing between clusters not exceeding 25’ to instead allow existing trees to remain in a linear layout with clusters of new trees provided between existing trees. Please see the Landscape Deviations East Buffer Exhibit included with this submittal. 38039 Old 5th Avenue Zephyrhills, FL 33542 Tel. (813) 788-7835 Fax. (813) 788-7062 www.cornelison-eng.com 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 921 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) Site Plan with Deviation for Redevelopment Narrative July 10, 2019; Revised August 26, 2019, Page 2 Justification 2: As stated above, the 7-Eleven #34816 project includes demolishing an existing Mobile gas station building and reconstruction of a new 3,058 sf 7-Eleven convenience store. The majority of the site including the existing canopy, car wash, parking, and drive aisles will remain. The project was approved for a building permit and site development plan on October 20, 1990 under SDP #90-192. A copy of the approved plans is included with this submittal. At the time of the original construction, a 5’ landscape buffer was required adjacent to rights of ways and interior property lines and the undulating berm was not required. The existing landscape buffer is 15’ wide containing 6 existing oak trees and three existing palm trees. To provide vehicular and gas tanker access around the existing canopy, the buffer cannot feasibly be increased beyond what currently exists. Adding fill material over the root system of established trees to create the undulating berm would not be advisable and may cause harm to the existing, otherwise healthy trees. Given the size and health of the existing trees a dense vegetative buffer already exists adjacent to the road right of way. The proposed plan includes a 15' wide buffer instead of the 25' buffer with 14' height x 6' spread canopy trees clustered in double rows with a minimum of three trees per cluster at a maximum spacing of 20' on center. 50% of the buffer length will contain 15-gallon shrubs at 5' height x 4' spread and 50% of the length of the buffer will contain 25-gallon shrubs at 6’ height x 5’ spread and the remainder of the buffer will be a combination of ornamental grasses and ground cover. As stated earlier, the six existing oaks and three existing palms in the buffer will be preserved. Preserving the existing trees is a benefit to the project. The required buffer plant material will be met and/or exceeded within the proposed buffer. There are no anticipated negative impacts as a result of this granting this request to allow a 15’ landscape buffer with no undulating berm along the eastern property line. Deviation 3: LDC 4.06.02.D.4, Sidewalks and Other Impervious Areas Must Not Occupy Any Part of a Required Buffer Deviation #3 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.06.02.D.4, Sidewalks and Other Impervious Areas Must Not Occupy Any Part of a Required Buffer, which requires sidewalks and other impervious areas must not occupy any part of a required alternative A, B, C, or D type buffer to instead allow the existing storage area structure to be located within the required south landscape buffer. Justification 3: As stated above, the 7-Eleven #34816 project includes demolishing an existing Mobile gas station building and reconstruction of a new 3,058 sf 7-Eleven convenience store. The majority of the site including the existing canopy, car wash, parking, and drive aisles will remain. The project was approved for a building permit and site development plan on October 20, 1990 under SDP #90-192. A copy of the approved plans is included with this submittal. At the time of the original construction, a 5’ landscape buffer was required adjacent to rights of ways and interior property lines. The existing south buffer is 15' wide but contains an existing storage area structure and transformers within the buffer area. The storage area houses the mechanical equipment for the existing car wash and is screened by an opaque fence. The adjacent dumpster enclosure will be relocated out of the landscape buffer. The electrical transformers serve the site and off-site uses and are located within existing electrical easements. With the exception of the car wash mechanical and electrical transformers, the buffer meets and/or exceeds the 15’ buffer requirement per the current code. The proposed plan includes preserving eight existing canopy trees and three existing palms within the southern buffer. In addition to the existing trees a continuous hedge of 15 gallon – 5' height shrubs will be added to the buffer. 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 922 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) Site Plan with Deviation for Redevelopment Narrative July 10, 2019; Revised August 26, 2019, Page 3 The existing equipment has been in place for approximately 30 years and relocating the equipment is not feasible, however, the adjacent dumpster will be relocated. With the exception of the existing equipment in the required buffer and electrical transformers, the requirements of the LDC are met as proposed. Additionally, preserving the existing trees is a benefit to the project. There are no anticipated negative impacts as a result of this request to allow the existing impervious area to be located within the required landscape buffer. Deviation 4: LDC Section 5.05.05.B.1, 40’ Side Yard Setback along North Property Line Deviation #4 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.05.05.B.1, 40’ Side Yard Setback along North Property Line, which requires site design requirements, Table 1, minimum setbacks, all structures: side yard (ft.) = 40’ (site standards), to instead allow a 22.5’± setback along the northern property line. Justification 4: As stated above, the 7-Eleven #34816 project includes demolishing an existing Mobile gas station building and reconstruction of a new 3,058 sf 7-Eleven convenience store. The majority of the site including the existing canopy, car wash, parking, and drive aisles will remain. The project was approved for a building permit and site development plan on October 20, 1990 under SDP #90-192. A copy of the approved plans is included with this submittal. At the time of the original construction, a 25’ building setback was required along the northern property line. The existing canopy (to remain) was constructed approximately 25.5’ from the property line. The existing fuel canopy has been on the site for nearly 30 years and will remain in place. The canopy met code requirements when permitted through the County and constructed. While most of the canopy meets the current minimum 40’ side yard setback requirement, the northern portion does not. This area consists of the overhead canopy structure only; there are no fuel pumps, equipment, or columns within this area. The existing canopy has been in place for approximately 30 years. With the exception of the northern 270 sf (5.4% of the overall structure), the existing canopy is located outside of the required 40’ setback. There are no anticipated negative impacts as a result of this request to allow a 22.5’± setback along the northern property line. Deviation 5: LDC Section 5.05.05.B.1, 40’ Side Yard Setback along South Property Line Deviation #5 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.05.05.B.1, 40’ Side Yard Setback along South Property Line, which requires site design requirements, Table 1, minimum setbacks, all structures: side yard (ft.) = 40’ (site standards), to instead allow a 16.8’± setback along the southern property line. Justification 5: As stated above, the 7-Eleven #34816 project includes demolishing an existing Mobile gas station building and reconstruction of a new 3,058 sf 7-Eleven convenience store. The majority of the site including the existing canopy, car wash, parking, and drive aisles will remain. The project was approved for a building permit and site development plan on October 20, 1990 under SDP #90-192. A copy of the approved plans is included with this submittal. At the time of the original construction, a 5’ building setback was required along the southern property line for the car wash. The existing car wash (to remain) was constructed approximately 16.8’ from the property line. The existing car wash has been on the site for nearly 30 years and will remain in place. The car wash met code requirements when permitted through the County and constructed. While the car wash building does not meet the current minimum side yard setback requirement, the existing 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 923 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) Site Plan with Deviation for Redevelopment Narrative July 10, 2019; Revised August 26, 2019, Page 4 buffer width is adequate to screen the interior project area from the adjacent property to the south. There are eight existing canopy trees and three existing palm trees located between the building and the adjacent roadway. All of the aforementioned trees are proposed to be retained. Additionally, a continuous hedge will be added; trees will also be added as needed so that the maximum 25' spacing between the buffer trees is not exceeded and to meet the ‘B’ buffer tree spacing requirement. There are no anticipated negative impacts as a result of this request to allow a 16.8’± setback along the southern property line. In conclusion, this redevelopment project falls within the applicability requirements for deviations per LDC, Chapter 5, Section 5.05.08.G.4.a.v, which states “Any other non-commercial building, or use, that is not listed under LDC Section 5.05.08 E. design standards for specific building types of this section, and due to its function, has specific requirements making meeting LDC Section 5.05.08 standards unfeasible.” AND LDC, Chapter 5, Section 5.05.08.G.4.a.vi, which states “Buildings located on property with a commercial zoning designation when submitted for Site Development Plan review…….” Furthermore, the project meets the standards for approval per LDC, Chapter 10, Section 10.02.03.F.7, which states “Standards for approval. The petition shall be reviewed for consistency with the following standards: a. Land uses and densities within the development shall be consistent with the permitted and approved conditional uses in the zoning district; b. The proposed development is consistent with the Growth Management Plan; c. The development shall have a beneficial effect both upon the area in which it is proposed to be established and upon the unincorporated area as a whole. d. The total land area within the development and the area devoted to each functional portion of the development shall be adequate to serve its intended purpose; e. Streets, utilities, drainage facilities, recreation areas, sizes and yards, architectural features, vehicular parking and loading facilities, sign distances, landscaping and buffers shall be appropriate for the particular use involved; f. Visual character of the project shall be equal or better in quality than that required by the development standards for the zoning district. The visual character of the project shall be better in quality than the existing project before redevelopment and after it was first permitted; g. Areas proposed for common ownership shall be subject to a reliable and continuing maintenance guarantee; h. Deviations shall be clearly delineated in the petition and shall be the minimum required to achieve the goals of the project and comply with these standards; i. The petitioner has provided enhancements to the development; and j. Approval of the deviation will not have an adverse effect on adjacent properties.” Based on the above: (a) The proposed project is consistent with the land uses and densities within the zoning district. The surrounding land uses are commercial in nature and this project is well suited to serve the adjacent commercial and residential areas. (b) The proposed project is consistent with the various elements of the County’s Growth Management Plan. (c) The proposed project has a beneficial effect both upon the area in which it is proposed to be established and upon the unincorporated area as a whole by providing updated architectural features and aesthetics, additional landscaping/open space, and additional buffering. Redevelopment of the project will reduce the impervious area in excess of 20% and will provide upgraded vehicular and pedestrian access. (d) The total land area within the development and the area devoted to each functional portion of the development is adequate to serve its intended purpose. (e) Drive aisles, utilities, drainage facilities, buffer yards, architectural features, vehicular parking and loading facilities, sign distances, landscaping and buffers are appropriate for the proposed use. (f) Visual character of the project will be equal or better in quality than that required by the development standards for the zoning district. The elevations have been reviewed by the county and are in 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 924 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) Site Plan with Deviation for Redevelopment Narrative July 10, 2019; Revised August 26, 2019, Page 5 compliance with the County’s LDC. Upon redevelopment, the visual character of the project shall be better in quality than the existing Mobile Gas Station as permitted. (g) Not Applicable. The property will be maintained by the applicant/landowner. (h) Deviations are clearly delineated in the petition (see above) and are the minimum required to achieve the goals of the project and comply with these standards. (i) Redevelopment of this project will enhance the property by providing a more aesthetically pleasing building, enhanced landscaping and conversion of existing pavement to open space. Redevelopment of the project will provide upgraded vehicular access and circulation as well as increased pedestrian access. (j) Approval of the deviations will have a positive effect on adjacent properties by providing for additional convenience store/retail space to serve the adjacent commercial and residential properties. Without approval of the requested deviations, renovation of the project would not be feasible. Redevelopment of the project will convert unused pavement to open space, result in a more aesthetically pleasing building, better vehicular access and circulation, updated landscaping, and pedestrian access. 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 925 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 926 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 927 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 1 4 5 DEVIATION KEY SHEET DR PL #20180001785 Existing Oak - to be preserved Two existing Cypress - to be preserved Existing Oak - to be preserved Three existing Cabbage Palms - to be preserved Existing Oak - to be preserved Three existing Oak - to be preserved Existing Oak - to be preserved Existing Oak - to be preserved 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 928 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 1 Marcia Cornelison From:AshtonHeidi Sent:Friday, October 18, 2019 4:34 PM To:CondominaDanny; SmithCamden Cc:CrotteauKathynell; SaboJames; BellowsRay Subject:7-Eleven #34816 (3701 Santa Barbara Blvd)-Disclosure DR-PL20180001785 Attachments:SEI flowchart 11.19.12.pdf; RE: Naples, FL (3701 Santa Barbara Blvd) Owners of 7-Eleven Danny and Camden, Can we get the attached pdf and email uploaded to DR-PL20180001785 for 7-Eleven? It satisfies the Disclosure of Ownership requirement. Thank you! Heidi Ashton-Cicko Heidi Ashton-Cicko Managing Assistant County Attorney Office of the Collier County Attorney 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Suite 301 Naples, FL 34104 (239) 252-8400 From: Melissa Ferreiro <MFerreiro@verdad.com> Sent: Friday, October 18, 2019 4:03 PM To: AshtonHeidi <Heidi.Ashton@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: TK Keen <TK@verdad.com>; Terri Blackstock <tblackstock@verdad.com>; Larae Tucker <larae@deacogroup.com> Subject: RE: Naples, FL (3701 Santa Barbara Blvd) Owners of 7-Eleven EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Hello Heidi, Attached is a flowchart for 7-Eleven. they are wholly owned by SEJ Asset Management & Investment Company. This chart shows all the way upstream to 7 & I, which is a public company. We are not aware of any shareholder of 7 &I that holds more than 10%. Hopefully this answers your questions. Thank you, MELISSA FERREIRO | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES VERDAD REAL ESTATE & CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 817.912.0529 |O | 817.680.0748 |M | VERDAD.COM From: AshtonHeidi <Heidi.Ashton@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Thursday, October 3, 2019 10:10 AM To: Wetherhold, Anita <Anita.Wetherhold@7-11.com>; Melissa Ferreiro <MFerreiro@verdad.com> 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 929 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 2 Cc: TK Keen <TK@verdad.com>; Terri Blackstock <tblackstock@verdad.com> Subject: RE: Naples, FL (3701 Santa Barbara Blvd) Owners of 7-Eleven Can you check to find out what is in the records of the minutes/minute book? All corporations have officers and shareholders. Heidi Ashton-Cicko Heidi Ashton-Cicko Managing Assistant County Attorney Office of the Collier County Attorney 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Suite 301 Naples, FL 34104 (239) 252-8400 From: Wetherhold, Anita <Anita.Wetherhold@7-11.com> Sent: Thursday, October 3, 2019 10:51 AM To: Melissa Ferreiro <MFerreiro@verdad.com>; AshtonHeidi <Heidi.Ashton@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: TK Keen <TK@verdad.com>; Terri Blackstock <tblackstock@verdad.com> Subject: RE: Naples, FL (3701 Santa Barbara Blvd) Owners of 7-Eleven EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. There are no shareholders. 7-Eleven, Inc. is a private company, not publicly traded. Attached are the 7-Eleven, Inc. officers for 2019. Let me know if you need further information. Thank you, Anita Wetherhold Property Manager 7-Eleven, Inc. From: Melissa Ferreiro <MFerreiro@verdad.com> Sent: Thursday, October 3, 2019 9:43 AM To: AshtonHeidi <Heidi.Ashton@colliercountyfl.gov>; Wetherhold, Anita <Anita.Wetherhold@7-11.com> Cc: TK Keen <TK@verdad.com>; Terri Blackstock <tblackstock@verdad.com> Subject: RE: Naples, FL (3701 Santa Barbara Blvd) Owners of 7-Eleven #EXTERNAL EMAIL# Good morning Anita, Can you please provide this information by the end of this week? So we can not be delayed on this project. Thank you, MELISSA FERREIRO | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES VERDAD REAL ESTATE & CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 817.912.0529 |O | 817.680.0748 |M | VERDAD.COM 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 930 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 3 From: AshtonHeidi <Heidi.Ashton@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Tuesday, October 1, 2019 4:20 PM To: Melissa Ferreiro <MFerreiro@verdad.com> Cc: Wetherhold, Anita <Anita.Wetherhold@7-11.com>; Terri Blackstock <tblackstock@verdad.com>; TK Keen <TK@verdad.com> Subject: RE: Naples, FL (3701 Santa Barbara Blvd) Owners of 7-Eleven Can you provide the names of the shareholders? Heidi Ashton-Cicko Heidi Ashton-Cicko Managing Assistant County Attorney Office of the Collier County Attorney 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Suite 301 Naples, FL 34104 (239) 252-8400 From: Melissa Ferreiro <MFerreiro@verdad.com> Sent: Monday, September 30, 2019 3:48 PM To: AshtonHeidi <Heidi.Ashton@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: Wetherhold, Anita <Anita.Wetherhold@7-11.com>; Terri Blackstock <tblackstock@verdad.com>; TK Keen <TK@verdad.com> Subject: Naples, FL (3701 Santa Barbara Blvd) Owners of 7-Eleven EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Good Afternoon Heidi, We need clarification of what you are needing us to provide you with in regards to the Owners of 7-Eleven, It is a corporation, the name is 7-Eleven, Inc. It is not individually owned. It is a privately held company. Anita with 7-Eleven, is on this email communication, and can help answer your questions. MELISSA FERREIRO | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES VERDAD REAL ESTATE & CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 817.912.0529 |O | 817.680.0748 |M | MFERREIRO@VERDAD.COM 1211 S WHITE CHAPEL BLVD. | SOUTHLAKE, TX 76092 | VERDAD.COM INFORMATION CONTAINED IN AND TRANSMITTED WITH THIS ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATION IS CONFIDENTIAL AND INTENDED EXCLUSIVELY FOR THE PERSON TO WHOM ADDRESSED. ANY DISCLOSURE, DISTRIBUTION, FURTHER TRANSMISSION OR USE OF THIS COMMUNICATION OR ANY INFORMATION HEREIN BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THE INTENDED RECIPIENT IS UNAUTHORIZED 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 931 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 4 AND PROHIBITED. ANYONE OTHER THAN THE INTENDED RECIPIENT OR HIS/HER AGENT WHO RECEIVES THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR SHOULD IMMEDIATELY DELETE, ERASE AND PERMANENTLY REMOVE IT FROM HIS/HER ELECTRONIC MAILBOX, COMPUTER DRIVES AND ALL OTHER ELECTRONIC STORAGE AREAS, DESTROY ANY PRINTED COPIES, AND NOTIFY VERDAD REAL ESTATE, INC. AND VERDAD CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, LLC AT 817.912.0222. Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 932 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE OF 7-ELEVEN, INC. SEVEN AND I HOLDINGS CO., LTD. A public Japanese corporation SEVEN ELEVEN JAPAN CO., LTD. A private Japanese corporation 7-ELEVEN, INC. A private Texas corporation 100% 100% SEJ ASSET MANAGEMENT & INVESTMENT COMPANY A private Delaware corporation 100% 9.A.6.h Packet Pg. 933 Attachment: Attachment F - Back up materials app (12395 : DR PL20180001785 7-Eleven Mobil Gas) 06/11/2020 COLLIER COUNTY Collier County Planning Commission Item Number: 9.A.7 Item Summary: PL20180003708: A Resolution of the Board of County Commissioners proposing amendment to the Collier County Growth Management Plan, Ordinance No. 89 -05, as amended, specifically amending the Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan and Map Series to add the Temple Shalom Community Facility Subdistrict to allow development of a church of up to 302 seats, a child care facility for up to 200 children, and on Tract 64 of the Golden Gate Estates Unit 26 Subdivision up to 22,000 square feet of community facility uses, and furthermore recommending transmittal of the amendment to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity. The subject property consisting of 13.5± acres is located at 4630 Pine Ridge Road in Section 15, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: Sue Faulkner, Growth Management Plan Manager] Meeting Date: 06/11/2020 Prepared by: Title: Planner, Senior – Zoning Name: Marcia R Kendall 05/18/2020 2:17 PM Submitted by: Title: Manager - Planning – Zoning Name: Ray Bellows 05/18/2020 2:17 PM Approved By: Review: Road Maintenance Diane Lynch Review item Completed 05/18/2020 2:41 PM Zoning Ray Bellows Review Item Completed 05/18/2020 4:06 PM Zoning Anita Jenkins Additional Reviewer Completed 05/18/2020 4:07 PM Growth Management Operations & Regulatory Management Donna Guitard Review Item Completed 05/18/2020 4:29 PM Zoning Diane Lynch Additional Reviewer Skipped 05/19/2020 9:39 AM Growth Management Department Diane Lynch Review Item Skipped 05/19/2020 9:39 AM Zoning Diane Lynch Review Item Skipped 05/19/2020 9:39 AM Planning Commission Mark Strain Meeting Pending 06/11/2020 9:00 AM 9.A.7 Packet Pg. 934 COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT 2019 CYCLE 2 AMENDMENTS (TRANSMITTAL HEARING) Petition: PL20180003708-CP-2019-2 CCPC: June 11, 2020 continued from March 19, 2020 BCC: July 14, 2020 9.A.7.a Packet Pg. 935 Attachment: 00_CCPC COVER (12062 : Temple Shalom) TABLE OF CONTENTS CCPC – 2019 Cycle 2 GMP Amendment Transmittal Hearing CCPC: June 11, 2020 (continued from March 19, 2020) 1) TAB: Transmittal Staff Report DOCUMENT: CCPC Staff Report: 2) TAB: Transmittal Resolution DOCUMENT: Resolution with Exhibit “A” text (and/or maps): 3) TAB: Project PL2018003708/ DOCUMENT: Application/Petition Petition CP-2019-2 4) TAB: Legal Advertisement DOCUMENT: CCPC Advertisement 9.A.7.b Packet Pg. 936 Attachment: 00_Table of Contents_CCPC (12062 : Temple Shalom) Agenda item 9._ 1 STAFF REPORT COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT, ZONING DIVISION, COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING SECTION HEARING DATE: June 4, 2020 (Continued from: March 19, 2020) RE: PETITION PL20180003708/CP-2019-2, GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT TEMPLE SHALOM COMMUNITY FACILITY SUBDISTRICT [TRANSMITTAL HEARING] AGENT/APPLICANT/OWNER Agents: D. Wayne Arnold, AICP Applicant & Owner: Ms. Debra Antzis, President Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. Temple Shalom, Inc. 3800 Via Del Rey 4630 Pine Ridge Road Bonita Springs, FL 34134 Naples, FL 34116 Richard Yovanovich Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A. The Northern Trust Bldg., 4001 Tamiami Trail N., Suite 300 Naples, FL 34103 GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property, comprising +13.5 acres, is located on the south side of Pine Ridge Road (CR 896), +¾ mile west of Collier Boulevard (CR 951), in Section 15, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, within the Urban Estates Planning Community. (see location map below, and aerial map on following page with subject site in blue brackets) 9.A.7.c Packet Pg. 937 Attachment: 01_Trans. Staff Rpt CP-2019-2_FINAL (12062 : Temple Shalom) Agenda item 9._ 2 REQUESTED ACTION: The applicant proposes a large-scale Growth Management Plan amendment to the Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element (UGGE) text and Future Land Use Map of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP), specifically to establish the new Temple Shalom Community Facility Subdistrict, by: 1) Amending Policy 1.1.4A. Estates Designation, Estates Mixed Use District, to add the Temple Shalom Community Facility Subdistrict; 2) Amending the Estates Mixed Use District to add the new Subdistrict provisions; 3) Amending the UGGE Future Land Use Map Series listing to add the title of the new Subdistrict map; and 4) Amending the UGGE Future Land Use Map to depict the new Subdistrict and adding a new Future Land Use Map Series inset map that depicts the new Subdistr ict. The proposed amended/added text and maps are depicted on Resolution Exhibit A’s. PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The petitioner is requesting this change to allow development of the site with “church and religious organization services and activities, childcare/pre -school center, religious teaching, and related religious philanthropic and community services and events.” Church sanctuary facilities are limited to a maximum of 302 seats [existing 302-seat temple]; childcare/preschool is limited to a maximum of 200 children at any one time [existing use has 70 children]; a maximum of 22,000 square feet of floor area of non-church and non-pre-school uses on the westerly portion of the site [undeve loped and wooded]. Homeless shelters and soup kitchens are prohibited , and the site must be rezoned to a Community Facility Planned Unit Development (CFPUD) to permit the uses in this subdistrict [there is a companion PUD rezone petition PL20180003710 that will be heard at the adoption hearing]. SURROUNDING LAND USE, ZONING AND FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION: Subject Property: The subject +13.57-acre site is comprised of three platted tracts (one tax parcel), oriented east to west: Tracts 68, 65 and 64, Golden Gate Estates Unit 26, less right -of-way. Tracts 68 and 65 are developed (302-seat temple and related religious uses and childcare/pre -school with 70 children) 9.A.7.c Packet Pg. 938 Attachment: 01_Trans. Staff Rpt CP-2019-2_FINAL (12062 : Temple Shalom) Agenda item 9._ 3 and Tract 64 is undeveloped and wooded. The entire site is zoned E, Estates, with conditional uses for church and childcare on Tracts 68 and 65 only ; and, it is designated Estates Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict. Surrounding Lands: North: Across Pine Ridge Road, a four-lane divided arterial road, single family dwellings on lands zoned “E” and designated Estates Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict . East: A single family dwelling on land zoned “E” and designated Estates Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict. Further east are single family dwellings. South: Single family dwellings on lands zoned “E” and designated Estates Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict. West: A single family dwelling on land zoned “E” and designated Estates Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict. Further east are single family dwellings. BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS: Prior to adoption of the GGAMP in 1991, which has locational criteria for conditional uses (CU) in the “E” zoning district – which the subject site does not meet, a provisional use (predecessor to CU) was approved for a church use on Tracts 68 and 65. Subsequent to adoption of the GGAMP, a CU was approved on the same site for childcare use (1993); this approval was based on an interpretation that a related CU (in this case, childcare integrally related to the temple use) could be approved without need to comply with the GGAMP CU locational criteria. Both uses have been in operation for 20+ years. Under that same interpretation, the CU for childcare could be amended to increase the number of children allowed without need for a GMP amendment. However, the petitioner desires to remove the grandfathered status of the two CUs , allow for the new uses that are separate but complementary (to be operated by the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples ), and to establish (through the CFPUD) a unified plan of development for the entire site. There are no other approved non -residential uses in close proximity to the site; the closest is the Brooks Commercial PUD approximately ½ mile to the east at the Pine Ridge Road /Collier Blvd. intersection. Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy This Restudy was conducted at a high level, viewing large areas and major issues, not a parcel by parcel review. The Restudy-based GMP amendments were adopted in 2019 and did not change the future land use designation , nor add or revise policies pertaining to uses, affecting any properties in Golden Gate Estates in the vicinity of this site. The subject site is proposed to retain the 302-seat temple and associated uses, expand the childcare from 70 to 200 children, and add complementary philanthropic uses, services and events. Some of the uses in the proposed subdistrict are permitted as CUs in residential and agricultural zoning districts “E” and A, Rural Agricultural), some are permitted in commercial zoning districts and some are permitted in the CF, Community Facility zoning district. All of these uses are considered community facility and institutional uses, not commercial uses, though they may exhibit some commercial characteristics. The CF district states, in part, “These uses can be characterized as public facilities, institutional uses, open space uses, water -related or dependent uses, and other such uses generally serving the public at large.” CF uses permitted by right include: child care centers; churches; civic and cultural facilities; assisted living facilities (ALF); parks and open space uses; educational facilities (private and parochial schools, colleges an d universities); libraries. CF uses permitted by conditional use include: community centers; private clubs; public swimming pools; tennis facilities. The church and childcare uses are explicitly permitted in the CF district and the 9.A.7.c Packet Pg. 939 Attachment: 01_Trans. Staff Rpt CP-2019-2_FINAL (12062 : Temple Shalom) Agenda item 9._ 4 other proposed uses have similar characteristics as some combination of the permitted CF uses, perhaps community center/private club/church /cultural facilities. The submitted data and analysis includes the “2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study.” Based on the large geographical area served, staff finds that the proposed location may be considered centrally located . Staff determined it not necessary to demonstrate a need for the church and childcare uses as they are not dependent upon this GMP amendment petition. In staff’s opinion, the statutory requirements for a GMP amendment, below and continuing to next page, can be summarized as: 1) whether there is a demonstrated need for the land use change/the use(s) proposed; and 2) whether this is the appropriate location to fulfill that need. Staff concurs with the petitioner that the submitted data and analysis does reasonably demonstrate that there is a need. As to the appropriateness of location, staff has identified no infrastructure impacts that result in a lowering of the adopted level of service standard for any affected public infrastructure and has identified no natural or cultural resource impact concerns. The subject site is located reasonably proximate to the persons it will serve given the broad service area. Based upon the surrounding development, presumed compatibility of the existing uses given their many years of operation at this location, off-peak time traffic impacts for some uses, the project location on an arterial road, operational characteristics of a typical church and childcare use, and presumed impacts of the new uses, staff is of the opinion that the proposed uses will be generally compatible with the surrounding area (at the high level at which GMP amendments are reviewed for compatibility) and that this is an appropriate location to provide the needed uses . Staff also finds it reasonable and logical to locate the new uses, which are complimentary to the existing uses, at this site The specific compatibility review is deferred to Zoning Services Section staff as part of the detailed review of the companion PUD rezone petition where specific compatibility measures are appropriately considered. Criteria for GMP Amendments in Florida Statutes Data and analysis requirements for comprehensive plans and plan amendments are noted in Chapter 163, F.S., specifically as listed below. Section 163.3177(1)(f), Florida Statutes: (f) All mandatory and optional elements of the comprehensive plan and plan amendments shall be based upon relevant and appropriate data and an analysis by the local government that may include, but not be limited to, surveys, studies, community goals and vision, and other data available at the time of adoption of the comprehensive plan or plan amendment. To be based on data means to react to it in an appropriate way and to the extent necessary indicated by the data available on that particular subject at the time of adoption of the plan or plan amendment at issue. 1. Surveys, studies, and data utilized in the preparation of the comprehensive plan may not be deemed a part of the comprehensive plan unless adopted as a part of it. Copies of such studies, surveys, data, and supporting documents for proposed plans and plan amendments shall be made available for public inspection, and copies of such plans shall be made available to the public upon payment of reasonable charges for reproduction. Support data or summaries are not subject to the compliance review process, but the comprehensive plan must be clearly based on appropriate data. Support data or summaries may be used to aid in the determination of compliance and consistency. 2. Data must be taken from professionally accepted sources. The application of a methodology utilized in data collection or whether a particular methodology is professionally accepted may be evaluated. However, the evaluation may not include whether one accepted methodology is better than another. Original data collection by local governments is not required. However, local governments may use original data so long as methodologies are professionally accepted. 9.A.7.c Packet Pg. 940 Attachment: 01_Trans. Staff Rpt CP-2019-2_FINAL (12062 : Temple Shalom) Agenda item 9._ 5 3. The comprehensive plan shall be based upon permanent and seasonal population estimates and projections, which shall either be those published by the Office of Economic and Demographic Research or generated by the local government based upon a professionally acceptable methodology. The plan must be based on at least the minimum amount of land required to accommodate the medium projections as published by the Office of Economic and Demographic Research for at least a 10-year planning period unless otherwise limited under s. 380.05, including related rules of the Administration Commission. Absent physical limitations on population growth, population projections for each municipality, and the unincorporated area within a county must, at a minimum, be reflective of each area’s proportional share of the total county population and the total county population growth. Section 163.3177(6)(a)2.: 2. The future land use plan and plan amendments shall be based upon surveys, studies, and data regarding the area, as applicable, including: [emphasis added] a. The amount of land required to accommodate anticipated growth. b. The projected permanent and seasonal population of the area. c. The character of undeveloped land. d. The availability of water supplies, public facilities, and services. e. The need for redevelopment, including the renewal of blighted areas and the elimination of nonconforming uses which are inconsistent with the character of the community. f. The compatibility of uses on lands adjacent to or closely proximate to military installations. g. The compatibility of uses on lands adjacent to an airport as defined in s. 330.35 and consistent with s. 333.02. h. The discouragement of urban sprawl. i. The need for job creation, capital investment, and economic development that will strengthen and diversify the community’s economy. j. The need to modify land uses and development patterns within antiquated subdivisions. Section 163.3177(6)(a)8., Florida Statutes: (a) A future land use plan element designating proposed future general distribution, location, and extent of the uses of land for residential uses, commercial uses, industry, agriculture, recreation, conservation, education, public facilities, and other categories of the public and private uses of land. The approximate acreage and the general range of density or intensity of use shall be provided for the gross land area included in each existing land use category. The element shall establish the long-term end toward which land use programs and activities are ultimately directed. 8. Future land use map amendments shall be based upon the following analyses: a. An analysis of the availability of facilities and services. b. An analysis of the suitability of the plan amendment for its proposed use considering the character of the undeveloped land, soils, topography, natural resources, and historic resources on site. c. An analysis of the minimum amount of land needed to achieve the goals and requirements of this section. Also, the state land planning agency has historically recognized the consideration of community desires (e.g. if the community has an articulated vision for a n area as to the type of development desired, such as within a Community Redevelopment Area), and existing incompatibilities (e.g. presently allowed uses would be incompatible with surrounding uses and conditions). NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM) NOTES: A Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) required by LDC Section 10.03.05 F was held on October 30, 2019, 5:30 p.m. at the Temple Shalom, located at 4630 Pine Ridge Road, Naples, FL 34116. This NIM was advertised, noticed and held jointly for this small scale GMP amendment petition and companion PUD rezone petition. 9.A.7.c Packet Pg. 941 Attachment: 01_Trans. Staff Rpt CP-2019-2_FINAL (12062 : Temple Shalom) Agenda item 9._ 6 The applicant team gave a presentation and responded to questions and comments. Less than ten members of the public attended besides members of the petitioner’s team and County staff. Five members of the public spoke; beyond asking questions/seeking more information, the following concerns were expressed and issues raised: access safety on/off Pine Ridge Road; traffic impacts; traffic safety regarding those exiting the site heading east then making a U -turn to head west; adequacy of parking ; adequacy of septic system so as to avoid contamination of adjacent property wells. The NIM minutes or notes, prepared by the applicant team, are includ ed in the petition package. The meeting was ended at approximately 6:40 pm. [synopsis prepared by David Weeks, AICP, Growth Management Manager] FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS: • The need for the proposed new uses is reasonably demonstrated. • The subject site is reasonably central to the geographical area of the population served. • It is reasonable and logical to locate the new uses, which are complimentary to the existing uses, at this site. • The Jewish Temple and childcare uses have operated at the subject site for 20+ years and are believed to have been good neighbors/compatible with surrounding land uses (all single family residential). • The proposed uses are considered community facility uses and institutional uses, not commercial uses. • There are no infrastructure impacts related concerns. • There are no unacceptable adverse impacts to environmental or cultural resources on the site. • The proposed new uses are generally compatible with the surrounding area based upon the macro level at which GMP amendments are reviewed. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This Staff Report was reviewed by the County Attorney’s Office on March 2, 2020. [HFAC] STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Collier County Planning Commission forward Petition PL20180003708/CP-2019-2 to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation to approve for transmittal to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity and other statutorily required agencies. [Remainder of page intentionally left blank] 9.A.7.c Packet Pg. 942 Attachment: 01_Trans. Staff Rpt CP-2019-2_FINAL (12062 : Temple Shalom) Agenda item 9._ 7 1 Petition Number: PL20180003708/CP-2019-2 Staff Report for March 19, 2020 CCPC meeting NOTE: This petition has been tentatively scheduled for the April 14, 2020 BCC meeting. Trans. SRpt CP-2019-2zzTmpSh G:\CDES Planning Services\Comprehensive\Comp Planning GMP DATA\Comp Plan Amendments\2019 Cycles and Smalls\2019 Cycle 2 - June\CP-19-2 Temple Shalom\CCPC saf 3-2-2020 9.A.7.c Packet Pg. 943 Attachment: 01_Trans. Staff Rpt CP-2019-2_FINAL (12062 : Temple Shalom) [19-CMP-01057/1538523/1]55 Temple Shalom GMPA / PL20180003708 5/4/20 Words underlined are additions, words struck through are deletions. Page 1 of 2 RESOLUTION NO. 2020- ____ A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PROPOSING AMENDMENT TO THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN, ORDINANCE NO. 89-05, AS AMENDED, SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE URBAN GOLDEN GATE ESTATES SUB-ELEMENT OF THE GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN AND MAP SERIES TO ADD THE TEMPLE SHALOM COMMUNITY FACILITY SUBDISTRICT TO ALLOW DEVELOPMENT OF A CHURCH OF UP TO 302 SEATS, A CHILD CARE FACILITY FOR UP TO 200 CHILDREN, AND ON TRACT 64 OF THE GOLDEN GATE ESTATES UNIT 26 SUBDIVISION UP TO 22,000 SQUARE FEET OF COMMUNITY FACILITY USES, AND FURTHERMORE RECOMMENDING TRANSMITTAL OF THE AMENDMENT TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY CONSISTING OF 13.5± ACRES IS LOCATED AT 4630 PINE RIDGE ROAD IN SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. [PL20180003708] WHEREAS, Collier County, pursuant to Section 163.3161, et. seq., Florida Statutes, the Florida Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act, was required to prepare and adopt a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the Collier County Board of County Commissioners adopted the Collier County Growth Management Plan on January 10, 1989; and WHEREAS, the Community Planning Act of 2011 provides authority for local governments to amend their respective comprehensive plans and outlines certain procedures to amend adopted comprehensive plans; and WHEREAS, Temple Shalom Inc., requested an amendment to the Golden Gate Estates Master Plan and Map Series to add the Temple Shalom Community Facility Subdistrict; and WHEREAS, on _________________, the Collier County Planning Commission considered the proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan pursuant to the authority granted to it by Section 163.3174, F.S., and has recommended approval of said amendment to the Board of County Commissioners; and WHEREAS, on __________________, the Board of County Commissioners at a public hearing approved the transmittal of the proposed amendment to the state land planning agency in accordance with Section 163.3184, F.S.; and CAO 9.A.7.d Packet Pg. 944 Attachment: 02_Resolution - 050420 (12062 : Temple Shalom) [19-CMP-01057/1538523/1]55 Temple Shalom GMPA / PL20180003708 5/4/20 Words underlined are additions, words struck through are deletions. Page 2 of 2 WHEREAS, upon receipt of Collier County’s proposed Growth Management Plan Amendment, various State agencies and the Department of Economic Opportunity (DEO) have thirty (30) days to review the proposed amendment and DEO must transmit, in writing, to Collier County its comments within said thirty (30) days pursuant to Section 163.3184, F.S.; and WHEREAS, Collier County, upon receipt of the written comments from DEO must adopt, adopt with changes or not adopt the proposed Growth Management Plan Amendment within one hundred and eighty (180) days of such receipt pursuant to Section 163.3184, F.S.; and WHEREAS, the DEO, within five (5) days of receipt of Collier County’s adopted Growth Management Plan Amendment, must notify the County of any deficiencies of the Plan Amendment pursuant to Section 163.3184(3), F.S. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA that: The Board of County Commissioners hereby approves the proposed Growth Management Plan Amendment, attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and incorporated by reference herein, for the purpose of transmittal to the Department of Economic Opportunity and other reviewing agencies thereby initiating the required State evaluation of the Growth Management Plan Amendment prior to final adoption. THIS RESOLUTION ADOPTED after motion, second and majority vote this _______ day of _____________, 2020. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: _________________________________ Burt L. Saunders, Chairman ATTEST: CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK ________________________ Deputy Clerk Approved as to form and legality: ________________________________ Heidi Ashton-Cicko Managing Assistant County Attorney Attachment: Exhibit A – Proposed Text Amendment & Map Amendment HFAC 5-4-20 CAO 9.A.7.d Packet Pg. 945 Attachment: 02_Resolution - 050420 (12062 : Temple Shalom) EXHIBIT A GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN URBAN GOLDEN GATE ESTATES SUB -ELE MENT *** *** *** *** *** Text break *** *** *** TABLE OF CONTENTS *** *** *** *** *** Text break *** *** A.Goals, Objectives and PoliciesB.Land Use Designation Description Section*** *** *** *** *** Text break *** *** C.List of MapsUrban Golden Gate Estates Future Land Use Map*** *** *** *** *** Text break *** *** Special Exceptions to Conditional Use in Golden Gate Estates Tem:gle Shalom Community Facility Subdistrict *** *** *** *** *** Text break *** *** A.GOALS, OJECTIVES AND POLICIES*** *** *** *** *** Text break *** *** GOAL 1: *** *** *** *** *** Text break *** *** OBJECTIVE 1.1: *** *** *** *** *** Text break *** *** Policy 1.1.4: *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** The ESTATES Future Land Use Designation shall include Future Land Use Districts and Subdistricts for: A.ESTATES -MIXED USE DISTRICT1.Residential Estates Subdistrict2.Neighborhood Center Subdistrict3.Conditional Uses Subdistrict4.Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict5.Tem:gle Shalom Community Facility Subdistrict*** *** *** *** *** Text break *** *** B.LAND USE DESIGNATION DESCRIPTION SECTION*** *** *** *** *** Text break *** *** *** PL20180003708/CP-20l 9-2 Temple Shalom Commumty Facility Subdistnct 1 of 4 *** *** *** *** *** CAO 9.A.7.d Packet Pg. 946 Attachment: 02_Resolution - 050420 (12062 : Temple Shalom) CAO 9.A.7.d Packet Pg. 947 Attachment: 02_Resolution - 050420 (12062 : Temple Shalom) CAO 9.A.7.d Packet Pg. 948 Attachment: 02_Resolution - 050420 (12062 : Temple Shalom) CAO 9.A.7.d Packet Pg. 949 Attachment: 02_Resolution - 050420 (12062 : Temple Shalom) Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134  239-947-1144  engineering@gradyminor.com  www.gradyminor.com Temple Shalom Community Facility Subdistrict (PL20180003708) Application and Supporting Documents March 19, 2020 CCPC Hearing 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 950 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 951 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. Ph. 239-947-1144 Fax. 239-947-0375 3800 Via Del Rey EB 0005151 LB 0005151 LC 26000266 Bonita Springs, FL 34134 www.gradyminor.com June 26, 2019 Mr. David Weeks Principal Planner Collier County Growth Management Division/ Planning and Regulation Land Development Services Department Comprehensive Planning Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 RE: Collier County Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Temple Shalom Community Facility Subdistrict (PL20180003708), Submittal 1 Dear Mr. Weeks: A Collier County Growth Management Plan Amendment (GMPA) application for properties located on the south side of Pine Ridge Road, approximately 0.6± miles west of Collier Boulevard is being filed electronically for review. This application proposes to create a new subdistrict in the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) Future Land Use Element to allow up to 22,000 square feet of building for religious and social organization uses, a church and maximum 200 student pre-school/day care uses in the subdistrict. Temple Shalom owns all property within this subdistrict; however, under the current GGAMP, the Temple cannot expand and develop approximately 4 acres of their property originally intended for development by the Temple. The Jewish Federation of Greater Naples, is an umbrella non-profit organization that provides financial, social and religious support to the Temple and other Jewish and non-denominational organizations in Collier County and intends to partner with the Temple in developing the undeveloped portion of the site with facilities that will fulfill their mutual interests. The GMPA is supported with a companion PUD rezone, which establishes the specific development standards for the proposed uses, and a Master Plan for development of the 13.5± acre property. 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 952 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Mr. David Weeks RE: Temple Shalom Community Facility Subdistrict (PL20180003708), Submittal 1 June 26, 2019 Page 2 of 2 Please feel free to contact me should you have any questions. Sincerely, D. Wayne Arnold, AICP c: Temple Shalom Jewish Federation of Greater Naples Clay Brooker, Cheffy Passidomo Richard D. Yovanovich GradyMinor File 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 953 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) 1 APPLICATION FOR A REQUEST TO AMEND THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN APPLICATOIN NUMBER: PL20180003708 DATE RECEIVED: ______________________________ PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE DATE : September 27, 2018 DATE SUFFICIENT: ______________________________________________________________________ This application, with all required supplemental data and information, must be completed and accompanied by the appropriate fee, and returned to the Growth Management Department, Zoning Division, Comprehensive Planning Section, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104. 239-252- 2400. The application must be reviewed by staff for sufficiency within 30 calendar days following the filing deadline before it will be processed and advertised for public hearing. The applicant will be notified in writing, of the sufficiency determination. If insufficient, the applicant will have 30 days to remedy the deficiencies. For additional information on the processing of the application, see Resolution 97-431 as amended by Resolution 98-18 (both attached). If you have any questions, please contact the Comprehensive Planning Section at 239-252-2400. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS I. GENERAL INFOMRATION A. Name of Applicant Debra Antzis, President Company Temple Shalom, Inc. Address 4630 Pine Ridge Road City Naples State FL Zip Code 34116 Phone Number (239)455-3030 Email Address info@naplestemple.org B. Name of Agent * D. Wayne Arnold, AICP  THIS WILL BE THE PERSON CONTACTED FOR ALL BUSINESS RELATED TO THE PETITION. Company Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. Address 3800 Via Del Rey City Bonita Springs State Florida Zip Code 34134 Phone Number 239-947-1144 Fax Number ___________________________ B1. Name of Agent * Richard D. Yovanovich  THIS WILL BE THE PERSON CONTACTED FOR ALL BUSINESS RELATED TO THE PETITION. Company Coleman, Yovanovich and Koester, P.A. Address The Northern Trust Building, 4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300 City Naples State Florida Zip Code 34103 C. Name of Owner (s) of Record Temple Shalom, Inc. Address 4630 Pine Ridge Road City Naples State FL Zip Code 34116 Phone Number (239)455-3030 Email Address info@naplestemple.org D. Name, Address and Qualifications of additional planners, architects, engineers, environmental consultants and other professionals providing information contained in this application. See Exhibit I.D. 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 954 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) 2 II. Disclosure of Interest Information: A. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, Tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest. (Use additional sheets if necessary). Name and Address Percentage of Ownership __________________________________________ _________________________ Not Applicable _________________________ __________________________________________ _________________________ __________________________________________ _________________________ __________________________________________ _________________________ B. If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each. Name and Address Percentage of Stock __________________________________________ Temple Shalom, Inc. _100______________ A Florida Not For Profit Corporation _________________________ __________________________________________ _________________________ __________________________________________ _________________________ C. If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest. Name and Address Percentage of Interest __________________________________________ _________________________ Not Applicable _________________________ _________________________ __________________________________________ _________________________ D. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and/or limited partners. Name and Address Percentage of Ownership __________________________________________ _________________________ Not Applicable _________________________ _________________________ __________________________________________ _________________________ E. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners. Name and Address Percentage of Ownership __________________________________________ _________________________ __________________________________________ _________________________ Not Applicable _________________________ _________________________ __________________________________________ _________________________ Date of Contract: __________________ 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 955 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) 3 F. If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or officers, if a corporation, partnership, or trust. Name and Address ________________________________________________________ Not Applicable ________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________ G. Date subject property acquired (12/12/1990) leased ( ):________Term of lease______yrs./mos. If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate date of option: Not Applicable and date option terminates: Not Applicable, or anticipated closing: Not Applicable. H. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. III. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: A. LEGAL DESCRIPTION __See Exhibit III.A_____________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ B. GENERAL LOCATION South side of Pine Ridge Road, approximately 0.6± miles west of Collier Boulevard C. PLANNING COMMUNITY Urban Estates D. TAZ 191 E. SIZE IN ACRES 13.5± F. ZONING E, Estates G. SURROUNDING LAND USE PATTERN Residential H. FUTURE LAND USE MAP DESIGNATION(S) Estates Designation, Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict IV. TYPE OF REQUEST: A. GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN ELEMENT (S) TO BE AMENDED: _______ Housing Element _______ Recreation/Open Space _______ Traffic Circulation Sub-Element _______ Mass Transit Sub-Element _______ Aviation Sub-Element _______ Potable Water Sub-Element _______ Sanitary Sewer Sub-Element _______ NGWAR Sub-Element _______ Solid Waste Sub-Element _______ Drainage Sub-Element _______ Capital Improvement Element _______ CCME Element _______ Future Land Use Element __ X____ Golden Gate Master Plan _______ Immokalee Master Plan B. AMEND PAGE (S) Beginning Page 30 OF THE Golden Gate Area Master Plan ELEMENT AS FOLLOWS: (Use Strike-through to identify language to be deleted; Use Underline to identify language to be added). Attach additional pages if necessary: _________________________________________________________________________ See Exhibit IV.B _________________________________________________________________________ C. AMEND FUTURE LAND USE MAP(S) DESIGNATION FROM Not applicable TO Not applicable 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 956 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) 4 D. AMEND OTHER MAP(S) AND EXHIBITS AS FOLLOWS: (Name & Page #) Golden Gate Area Future Land Use Map See Exhibit IV.D. ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ E. DESCRIBE ADDITINAL CHANGES REQUESTED: ________________________________________ Create Naples Senior Center Community Facility Subdistrict Inset Map. See Exhibit IV.E. V. REQUIRED INFORMATION: NOTE: ALL AERIALS MUST BE AT A SCALE OF NO SMALLER THAN I”=400’. At least one copy reduced to 8- 1/2 x 11 shall be provided of all aerials and/or maps. A. LAND USE Exhibit V.A. Provide general location map showing surrounding developments (PUD, DRI’s, existing zoning) with subject property outlined. Exhibit V.A. Provide most recent aerial of site showing subject boundaries, source, and date. Exhibit V.A. Provide a map and summary table of existing land use and zoning within a radius of 300 feet from boundaries of subject property. B. FUTURE LAND USE AND DESIGNATION Exhibit V.B. Provide map of existing Future Land Use Designation(s) of subject property and adjacent lands, with acreage totals for each land use designation on the subject property. C. ENVIRONMENTAL Exhibit V.C. Provide most recent aerial and summary table of acreage of native habitats and soils occurring on site. HABITAT IDENTIFICATION MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH THE FDOT- FLORIDA LAND USE, COVER AND FORMS CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (FLUCCS CODE). NOTE: THIS MAY BE INDICATED ON SAME AERIAL AS THE LAND USE AERIAL IN “A” ABOVE. Exhibit V.C. Provide a summary table of Federal (US Fish & Wildlife Service) and State (Florida Game & Freshwater Fish Commission) listed plant and animal species known to occur on the site and/or known to inhabit biological communities similar to the site (e.g. panther or black bear range, avian rookery, bird migratory route, etc.).Identify historic and/or archaeological sites on the subject property. D. GROWTH MANAGEMENT Reference F.A.C. Chapter 163-3177 and Collier County’s Capital Improvements Element Policy 1.1.2 (Copies attached). 1. INSERT “Y” FOR YES OR “N” FOR NO IN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING: N Is the proposed amendment located in an Area of Critical State Concern? (Reference 9J-11.006(1)(a)(5), F.A.C.). IF so, identify area located in ACSC. N Is the proposed amendment directly related to a proposed Development of Regional Impact pursuant to Chapter 380 F.S. ? (Reference 9J-11.006(1)(a)7.a, F.A.C.) N/N Is the proposed amendment directly related to a proposed Small Scale Development Activity pursuant to Subsection 163.3187 (1)(c), F.S. ? (Reference 9J-11.006(1)(a)7.b, F.A.C.) Does the proposed amendment create a significant impact in population which is defined as a potential increase in County-wide population by more than 5% of population projections? (Reference Capital Improvement Element Policy 1.1.2). If yes, indicate mitigation measures being proposed in conjunction with the proposed amendment. 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 957 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) 5 Y, Exhibit V.D. Does the proposed land use cause an increase in density and/or intensity to the uses permitted in a specific land use designation and district identified (commercial, industrial, etc.) or is the proposed land use a new land use designation or district? (Reference Rule 9J-5.006(5) F.A.C.). If so, provide data and analysis to support the suitability of land for the proposed use, and of environmentally sensitive land, ground water and natural resources. (Reference Rule 9J-11.007, F.A.C.) E. PUBLIC FACILITIES 1. Provide the existing Level of Service Standard (LOS) and document the impact the proposed change will have on the following public facilities: Exhibit V.E. Potable Water Exhibit V.E. Sanitary Sewer Exhibit V.E.1 Arterial & Collector Roads; Name specific road and LOS Pine Ridge Road Collier Boulevard Exhibit V.E. Drainage Exhibit V.E. Solid Waste Exhibit V.E. Parks: Community and Regional If the proposed amendment involves an increase in residential density, or an increase in intensity for commercial and/or industrial development that would cause the LOS for public facilities to fall below the adopted LOS, indicate mitigation measures being proposed in conjunction with the proposed amendment. (Reference Capital Improvement Element Objective 1 and Policies) 2. Exhibit V.E. Provide a map showing the location of existing services and public facilities that will serve the subject property (i.e. water, sewer, fire protection, police protection, schools and emergency medical services. 3. Exhibit V.E. Document proposed services and public facilities, identify provider, and describe the effect the proposed change will have on schools, fire protection and emergency medical services. F. OTHER Identify the following areas relating to the subject property: Exhibit V.F Flood zone based on Flood Insurance Rate Map data (FIRM). N.A. Location of wellfields and cones of influence, if applicable. (Identified on Collier County Zoning Maps) N.A. Traffic Congestion Boundary, if applicable N.A. Coastal Management Boundary, if applicable N.A. High Noise Contours (65 LDN or higher) surrounding the Naples Airport, if applicable (identified on Collier County Zoning Maps). G. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION N.A. $16,700.00 non-refundable filing fee made payable to the Board of County Commissioners due at time of submittal. (Plus proportionate share of advertising costs) Provided $9,000.00 non-refundable filing fee for a Small Scale Amendment made payable to the Board of County Commissioners due at time of submittal. (Plus proportionate share of advertising costs) 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 958 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) 6 Exhibit V.G.3 Proof of ownership (copy of deed) Exhibit V.G.4 Notarized Letter of Authorization if Agent is not the Owner (See attached form) Submitted Electronically 1 Original and 5 complete, signed applications with all attachments including maps, at time of submittal. After sufficiency is completed, 25 copies of the complete application will be required. * If you have held a pre-application meeting and paid the pre-application fee of $250.00 at the meeting, deduct that amount from the above application fee amount when submitting your application. All pre-application fees are included in the total application submittal fee. Otherwise the overage will be applied to future proportionate share advertising costs. * Maps shall include: North arrow, name and location of principal roadways and shall be at a scale of 1”=400’ or at a scale as determined during the pre -application meeting. 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 959 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) 7 LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN I hereby authorize Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. and Yovanovich, Coleman & Koester, P.A. (Name of Agent) to serve as my Agent in a request to amend the Collier County Growth Management Plan affecting property identified in this Application. Signed: ________________________________________ Date: _________________________ Debra Antzis as President of Temple Shalom, Inc. I hereby certify that I have the authority to make the foregoing application, and that the application is true, correct and complete to the best of my knowledge. ______________________________________ Signature of Applicant Debra Antzis as President of Temple Shalom, Inc. STATE OF ( ) COUNTY OF ( ) Sworn to and subscribed before me this ____________day of _____________________, 2019 by________________________________ MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: Notary Public CHOOSE ONE OF THE FOLLOWING: _______ who is personally known to me, _______ who has produced _____________________________as identification and _______ did take an Oath _______ did not take and Oath NOTICE - BE AWARE THAT: Florida Statute Section 837.06 - False Official Law states that: “Whoever knowingly makes a false statement in writing with the intent to mislead a public servant in the performance of his official duty shall be guilty of a misdemeanor of the second degree, punishable as provided by a fine to a maximum of %500.00 and/or maximum of a sixty day jail term.” 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 960 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Temple Shalom Small-Scale Plan Amendment (PL20180003708) Exhibit I.D. Professional Consultants May 14, 2019 Page 1 of 1 JFGNA-18 Exhibit ID.docx Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134  239-947-1144  engineering@gradyminor.com  www.gradyminor.com Planning/Project Management: D. Wayne Arnold, AICP Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey Bonita Springs, FL 34134 239.947.1144 239.947.0375 fax warnold@gradyminor.com Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq Coleman, Yovanovich and Koester, P.A. 4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300 Naples, FL 34103 239.435.3535 239.435.1218 fax ryovanovich@cyklawfirm.com Transportation: James M. Banks, P.E., President JMB Transportation Engineering, Inc. 4711 7th Avenue SW Naples, FL 34119 239.919.2767 jmbswte@msn.com Environmental: Marco A. Espinar – Biologist, President Collier Environmental Consultants, Inc. 3880 Estey Avenue Naples, Florida 34104 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 961 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Temple Shalom Small-Scale Plan Amendment (PL20180003708) Exhibit III.A Legal Description August 26, 2019 Page 1 of 1 JFGNA-18 Exhibit IIIA-rev1.docx Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134  239-947-1144  engineering@gradyminor.com  www.gradyminor.com TRACT 64, LESS THE NORTH 75 FEET THEREOF; TRACT 65, LESS THE NORTH 75 FEET THEREOF; TRACT 68, LESS THE NORTH 75 FEET THEREOF; GOLDEN GATE ESTATES UNIT 26, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 7, PAGES 15 AND 16, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 962 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Temple Shalom Community Facility Subdistrict (PL20180003708)    Exhibit IV.B.  Amendment Language        December 18, 2019    Page 1 of 3  JFGNA‐18 Exhibit IVB Proposed GMP Language‐rev2.docx      Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134  239-947-1144  engineering@gradyminor.com  www.gradyminor.com Revise the  GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN  URBAN GOLDEN GATE ESTATES SUB‐ELEMENT      TABLE OF CONTENTS    A. Goals, Objectives and Policies           1    B. Land Use Designation Description Section         9  1. ESTATES DESIGNATION          9  A. Estates – Mixed Use District          9  1. Residential Estates Subdistrict  2. Neighborhood Center Subdistrict  3. Conditional Uses Subdistrict  4. Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict  5. Temple Shalom Center Community Facility Subdistrict  B. Estates – Commercial District          15  1. Interchange Activity Center Subdistrict  2. Pine Ridge Road Mixed Use Subdistrict  3. Commercial Western Estates Infill Subdistrict  4. Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict  5. Southbrooke Office Subdistrict    C. List Of Maps             19  Urban Golden Gate Estates Future Land Use Map  Urban Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict  Pine Ridge Road (CR 896) ‒ Interchange Activity Center and Pine Ridge Road Mixed Use Subdistrict  Urban Golden Gate Estates Neighborhood Center  Collier Boulevard/Pine Ridge Road Center  Commercial Western Estates Infill Subdistrict  Golden Gate Parkway Interchange Conditional Uses Area  Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict  Southbrooke Office Subdistrict  Conditional Uses Subdistrict: Golden Gate Parkway Special Provisions  Special Exceptions to Conditional Use in Golden Gate Estates  9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 963 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Temple Shalom Community Facility Subdistrict (PL20180003708)    Exhibit IV.B.  Amendment Language        December 18, 2019    Page 2 of 3  JFGNA‐18 Exhibit IVB Proposed GMP Language‐rev2.docx      Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134  239-947-1144  engineering@gradyminor.com  www.gradyminor.com Temple Shalom Center Community Facility Subdistrict    *** *** *** *** *** Text break *** *** *** *** ***    Policy 1.1.4:           [page 1]    The ESTATES Future Land Use Designation shall include Future Land Use Districts and  Subdistricts for:    A. ESTATES – MIXED USE DISTRICT  1. Residential Estates Subdistrict  2. Neighborhood Center Subdistrict  3. Conditional Uses Subdistrict  4. Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict  5. Temple Shalom Community Facility Subdistrict  B. ESTATES – COMMERCIAL DISTRICT  1. Interchange Activity Center Subdistrict  2. Pine Ridge Road Mixed Use Subdistrict  3. Commercial Western Estates Infill Subdistrict  4. Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict  5. Southbrooke Office Subdistrict  *** *** *** *** *** Text break *** *** *** *** ***    A.  Estates – Mixed Use District          *** *** *** *** *** Text break *** *** *** *** ***      5.  Temple Shalom Community Facility Subdistrict    The subdistrict consists of 13.5+/‐ acres and is located on the south side of Pine Ridge Road  approximately ¾ mile west of Collier Boulevard.  It is comprised of Tracts 64, 65 and 68, Golden  Gate Estates, Unit 26, less right of way.  The purpose of the subdistrict is to allow for a campus  of community facility uses as provided for below.  Development within the Subdistrict shall be  subject to the following:    9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 964 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Temple Shalom Community Facility Subdistrict (PL20180003708)    Exhibit IV.B.  Amendment Language        December 18, 2019    Page 3 of 3  JFGNA‐18 Exhibit IVB Proposed GMP Language‐rev2.docx      Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134  239-947-1144  engineering@gradyminor.com  www.gradyminor.com a. The Subdistrict shall be rezoned to a Community Facility Planned Unit Development  (CFPUD), which shall specify permitted uses.    b. Allowable uses are church and religious organization services and activities,  childcare/pre‐school center, religious teaching, and related religious philanthropic  and community services and events     c. Tract 64 is limited to non‐church and non‐pre‐school uses and a maximum of 22,000  square feet of floor area.    d. A maximum of 302 seats shall be permitted for the church sanctuary facilities.    e. Childcare shall be limited to a maximum of 200 children at any one time.     f. Homeless shelters and soup kitchens shall be prohibited.    g. The CFPUD ordinance shall include development standards and buffers to insure  compatibility with surrounding properties.      *** *** *** *** *** Text break *** *** *** *** ***    C. LIST OF MAPS           [page 19]  Urban Golden Gate Estates Future Land Use Map  Urban Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict  Pine Ridge Road Interchange Activity Center and Pine Ridge Road Mixed Use Subdistrict  Urban Golden Gate Estates Neighborhood Center  Collier Boulevard/Pine Ridge Road Center  Commercial Western Estates Infill Subdistrict  Golden Gate Parkway Interchange Conditional Uses Area  Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict  Southbrooke Office Subdistrict  Conditional Uses Subdistrict: Golden Gate Parkway Special Provisions  Special Exceptions to Conditional Use Locational Criteria in Golden Gate Estates  Temple Shalom Community Facility Subdistrict       9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 965 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) SITE ESTATES DESIGNATION, COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, TEMPLE SHALOM COMMUNITY FACILITY SUBDISTRICT = 13.5± ACRES TEMPLE SHALOM COMMUNITY FACILITY SUBDISTRICT (PL20180003708) EXHIBIT IV.D. PROPOSED GOLDEN GATE AREA FUTURE LAND USE MAP 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 966 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 967 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) GradyMinor Civil Engineers ●Land Surveyors ●Planners ●Landscape Architects Cert. of Auth. EB 0005151 Cert. of Auth. LB 0005151 Business LC 26000266 Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey Bonita Springs, Florida 34134 Bonita Springs: 239.947.1144 www.GradyMinor.com Fort Myers: 239.690.4380 0 300'150' SCALE: 1" = 300' WHEN PLOTTED @ 8.5" X 11" 68%-(&73523(57<“$&5(6 EXISTING ZONING:E, ESTATES EXISTING FLUE:ESTATES DESIGNATION, MIXED USE DISTRICT, RESIDENTIAL ESTATES SUBDISTRICT EXISTING USE:TEMPLE SHALOM AND PARTIALLY UNDEVELOPED ADJACENT PROPERTY NORTH ZONING:E, ESTATES USE:RESIDENTIAL SOUTH ZONING:E, ESTATES USE:RESIDENTIAL EAST ZONING:E, ESTATES USE:RESIDENTIAL WEST ZONING:E, ESTATES USE:RESIDENTIAL 500 FOOT RADIUS ZONED: E USE: RESIDENTIAL PINE RIDGE ROAD ZONED: E USE: RESIDENTIAL ZONED: E USE: RESIDENTIAL ZONED: E USE: RESIDENTIAL 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 968 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) SITE ESTATES DESIGNATION, MIXED USE DISTRICT, RESIDENTIAL ESTATES SUBDISTRICT = 13.5± ACRES TEMPLE SHALOM COMMUNITY FACILITY SUBDISTRICT (PL20180003708) EXHIBIT V.B. EXISTING GOLDEN GATE AREA FUTURE LAND USE MAP 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 969 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 970 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 971 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 972 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) E, ESTATES RESIDENTIAL PINE RIDGE ROAD E, ESTATES RESIDENTIALE, ESTATES RESIDENTIAL E, ESTATES RESIDENTIAL PRESERVEMINIMUM 20' WIDE TYPE 'D' LANDSCAPE BUFFER WITH 6' HIGH DECORATIVE FENCE BUILDING AREA GRASS PARKING PROPERTY BOUNDARY GRASS PARKING MINIMUM 15' WIDE TYPE 'B' LANDSCAPE BUFFER WITH 6' HIGH CHAIN LINK FENCE MINIMUM 15' WIDE TYPE 'B' LANDSCAPE BUFFER WITH 6' HIGH CHAIN LINK FENCEDRY DETENTION AREAPROPERTY BOUNDARY MINIMUM 15' WIDE TYPE 'B' LANDSCAPE BUFFER WITH 6' HIGH CHAIN LINK FENCE SEPTIC SYSTEM DRIVEWAY/PARKING BUILDING SIDEWALK LANDSCAPE BUFFER (SDP-90-128 - TRACTS 65 & 68 - 0.8± ACRES) PRESERVE (TRACT 64 - 0.66 ACRES) AND PRESERVE PER SDP-90-128 (TRACT 65 & 68 - 0.34 ACRES) BUILDING AREA GRASS PARKING GRASS PARKING GRASS PARKING GRASS PARKINGSEPTIC SYSTEM OUTDOOR PLAY AREA PRE-SCHOOL OPEN SPACEMINIMUM 20' WIDE TYPE 'D' LANDSCAPE BUFFER WITH 6' HIGH DECORATIVE FENCE TRACT 65TRACT 64 TRACT 68TRACT 65 MINIMUM 6' WIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFER RESERVATION (SEE NOTE #2)PRESERVE6' HIGH DECORATIVE FENCE, EAST OF PRESERVE, TO EXTEND 100' SOUTH 6' HIGHDECORATIVEFENCE TOEXTEND 100'SOUTHGradyMinor Civil Engineers ●Land Surveyors ●Planners ●Landscape Architects Cert. of Auth. EB 0005151 Cert. of Auth. LB 0005151 Business LC 26000266 Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey Bonita Springs, Florida 34134 Bonita Springs: 239.947.1144 www.GradyMinor.com Fort Myers: 239.690.4380 0 150'125' SCALE: 1" = 150' WHEN PLOTTED @ 8.5 X 11 # DEVIATION 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 973 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) GradyMinor Civil Engineers ●Land Surveyors ●Planners ●Landscape Architects Cert. of Auth. EB 0005151 Cert. of Auth. LB 0005151 Business LC 26000266 Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey Bonita Springs, Florida 34134 Bonita Springs: 239.947.1144 www.GradyMinor.com Fort Myers: 239.690.4380 NOTES 1.THIS PLAN IS CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE AND IS SUBJECT TO MODIFICATION DUE TO AGENCY PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS. 2.PRESERVES MAY BE USED TO SATISFY THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER REQUIREMENTS AFTER EXOTIC VEGETATION REMOVAL IN ACCORDANCE WITH 4.06.02 AND 4.06.05.E.1. SUPPLEMENTAL PLANTINGS WITH NATIVE PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH LDC SECTION 3.05.07. IN ORDER TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF A TYPE 'B' BUFFER ALONG THE WESTERN BOUNDARY OF THE PUD, A 6-FOOT-WIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFER RESERVATION HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED ON THE MASTER PLAN. IN THE EVENT THAT THE PRESERVE DOES NOT MEET BUFFER REQUIREMENTS AFTER REMOVAL OF EXOTICS AND SUPPLEMENTAL PLANTING WITHIN THE PRESERVE, PLANTINGS WILL BE PROVIDED IN THE 6' WIDE RESERVATION TO MEET THE BUFFER REQUIREMENTS. THE TYPE, SIZE, AND NUMBER OF SUCH PLANTINGS, IF NECESSARY, WILL BE DETERMINED AT TIME OF INITIAL SDP OR PLAT AND INCLUDED ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR THE SDP OR PLAT. SITE SUMMARY TOTAL SITE AREA: 13.5± ACRE (AC) COMMUNITY FACILITY:11.6± AC (86%) PRESERVE:0.66± AC (5%) (TRACT 64) NATIVE VEGETATION:0.34± AC (2%) (TRACT 65 AND 68 PER SDP-90-128) LANDSCAPE BUFFERS:0.9± AC (7%) MAXIMUM BUILDING AREA: 22,000 S.F. (TRACT 64) 50,000 S.F. (TRACT 65 AND 68) OPEN SPACE: REQUIRED:4.05± AC (13.5± AC X 0.30) PROVIDED:4.05± AC PRESERVE: REQUIRED:1.0 ACRES TRACT 65 AND 68:0.34 ACRES NATIVE VEGETATION PER SDP-90-128 TRACT 64:0.66 ACRES (4.43± ACRES NATIVE VEGETATION X 0.15) PROVIDED:1.0 ACRES DEVIATIONS (SEE EXHIBIT E): 1.GRASS PARKING (APPLIES TO ENTIRE PUD) 2.PARKING DISTRIBUTION (APPLIES TO ENTIRE PUD) 3.PRESERVE SETBACK 4.FENCE 5.PRESERVE STANDARDS # DEVIATION 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 974 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 975 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 976 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 977 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 978 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 979 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 980 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 981 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 982 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 983 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 984 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 985 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 986 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 987 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Temple Shalom Community Facility Subdistrict (PL20180003708)    Exhibit V.D.  Comprehensive Plan Consistency and Statutory Criteria for Plan Amendments    January 16, 2020   Page 1 of 7  JFGNA‐18 Exhibit VD Growth Management‐rev2.docx    Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134  239-947-1144  engineering@gradyminor.com  www.gradyminor.com The amendment proposes to amend the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) to create a  new subdistrict, which will encompass the existing Temple Shalom property as well as an  undeveloped 4.43+/‐ acre (Tract 64 GGE) of the property presently owned by the Temple  Shalom.  The subdistrict would permit the Temple to continue its present religious organization  and pre‐school activities, and to incorporate the unimproved 4.43± acre parcel into their  overall campus plan, on which they will expand their religious organization activities in  cooperation with the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples (JFGN).  The Temple initially received  a conditional use for a church (religious facility) in 1989 on 9+/‐ acres of their property and  subsequent conditional use approval for a pre‐school.  Their original application included all  13.5+/‐ acres under their ownership; however, because the Temple did not have more specific  plans for the westernmost portion (Tract 64) of the property, the County Commission  requested removal of that portion of the site from the provisional use application.  The Temple  was instructed to amend the conditional use once it decided upon more specific plans for use  of Tract 64.  In 1993, the Temple received conditional use approval for a childcare center on  the 9+/‐ acres that had been developed with the Temple and associated uses (Resolution #93‐ 290).      The original conditional use for the childcare facility limited enrollment to 70 children.   However, due to increased demand in the area of non‐denominational childcare, the number  of children utilizing the Temple’s childcare facility has increased over the years, with the  County’s knowledge.  Indeed, in 2000, the Temple added approximately 21,000 square feet to  its facilities, pursuant to SDP‐90‐128(E), to accommodate the increased demand.  This past  year, approximately 180 students utilized the childcare facility.  The CFPUD proposed by this  rezone application limits enrollment to 200 students to reflect the increased demand and  utilization.     Collier County approved the 1989 provisional use and the 1993 conditional use (allowed by  policy) prior to the 1991 adoption of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP).  Those pre‐ existing uses have been deemed consistent by policy with the GGAMP.  However, the Temple  does not meet the GGAMP’s locational criteria for churches and similar uses to obtain  conditional use approval.  Accordingly, a companion CFPUD rezone application has been filed  with this GMPA application.    As mentioned above, this GMPA application proposes to increase the number of students for  the childcare facility to a maximum of 200.  The childcare facility would continue to be limited  to Tracts 65 and 68.  However, the GMPA application also proposes to permit the religious and  social organization uses on the entire 13.5+/‐ property (Tracts 64, 65 and 68).     Temple Shalom provides congregants with a place to worship, observe religious studies and  to provide a social resource for the Jewish faith.  As part of its overall program activities,  9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 988 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Temple Shalom Community Facility Subdistrict (PL20180003708)    Exhibit V.D.  Comprehensive Plan Consistency and Statutory Criteria for Plan Amendments    January 16, 2020   Page 2 of 7  JFGNA‐18 Exhibit VD Growth Management‐rev2.docx    Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134  239-947-1144  engineering@gradyminor.com  www.gradyminor.com Temple Shalom partners with other Jewish faith agencies such as the Jewish Federation of  Greater Naples to provide a variety of services beyond worship or child day care.   Most of  these activities occur in some form presently at the Temple’s campus and include:   Youth Activities   Philanthropic Activities   Social Action Activities   Volunteer Activities   Community Service   Community Events   Community Outreach   Interfaith Outreach   Men’s and Women’s Group Activities   Semi‐catered Community Events   Book Lectures   Religious administrative functions such as administration, accounting, staff  offices, and fund raising   Adult Jewish Education programs   Israel Education   Judaic Discussion Groups  Obtaining the GMPA and companion CFPUD approval for religious facilities and related  activities will permit the Temple and Jewish Federation of Greater Naples an opportunity to  combine efforts to expand their community outreach for Jewish religious and cultural  programming in a single campus environment, to meet the demands of the increasing  population of those of the Jewish faith in Collier County.          The Golden Gate Master Plan Restudy effort did not look at site‐specific land parcels.   The  restudy was a very high‐level policy analysis of the existing master plan.  The proposed uses in  the new subdistrict are compatible with the existing campus that houses the Temple and  related religious organization activities and pre‐school.   The Community Facility Planned Unit  Development (CFPUD) has been submitted as a companion item, which will include buffers  insuring compatibility with adjacent properties, as well as a conceptual master plan, identifying  the location of the proposed buildings and site improvements on the entire 13.53+/‐ acre  Temple Shalom campus property.   It is unlikely that a domino effect for future non‐residential  uses will be created if the proposed plan amendment is approved.  The approval of the  amendment to allow expansion of the Temple and its social organization related uses on  property owned originally intended for development by the Temple makes for efficient  planning and use of existing infrastructure and site improvements.   The Temple was originally  approved authorizing two access points to Pine Ridge Road.   The development of all of the  9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 989 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Temple Shalom Community Facility Subdistrict (PL20180003708)    Exhibit V.D.  Comprehensive Plan Consistency and Statutory Criteria for Plan Amendments    January 16, 2020   Page 3 of 7  JFGNA‐18 Exhibit VD Growth Management‐rev2.docx    Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134  239-947-1144  engineering@gradyminor.com  www.gradyminor.com lands under the control and ownership of the Temple, as proposed, will allow Collier County to  prohibit direct access to Pine Ridge Road from Tract 64.        The proposed amendment is a logical land use change.  Since adoption of the Golden Gate Area  Master Plan in 1991, the County has made significant roadway improvements in the area  including 4‐laning Pine Ridge Road and 6‐laning Collier Boulevard.  Recognizing the location  and pattern of development occurring in the immediate vicinity, the proposed land use change  is logical, and it is compatible with the surrounding development.   The companion CFPUD  provides for a master plan on which proposed building locations, site improvements, open  space, and buffers are depicted for the entire property owned by the Temple.  Expansion of  the proposed uses onto land currently owned by the Temple makes for efficient planning and  utilization of the property for services for the Jewish faith in our community.      Under Chapter 163 F.S., local governments are authorized to adopt and amend their  comprehensive plans.  Staff has requested that the applicant address three sections from  Chapter 163.      Chapter 163.3167 Scope of act.—  (9) Each local government shall address in its comprehensive plan, as enumerated in this  chapter, the water supply sources necessary to meet and achieve the existing and projected  water use demand for the established planning period, considering the applicable plan developed  pursuant to s. 373.709.    The applicant intends to work with Collier County Water‐Sewer District to extend potable  water services currently serving Temple Shalom to this portion of their property.  Wastewater  will be handled through septic systems, similar to that serving the existing Temple Shalom  facility.    There are no existing or anticipated capacity issues for water services.       Chapter 163.3177  (6) (a) 2. The future land use plan and plan amendments shall be based upon surveys,  studies, and data regarding the area, as applicable, including:     a. The amount of land required to accommodate anticipated growth.  b. The projected permanent and seasonal population of the area.  c. The character of undeveloped land.  d. The availability of water supplies, public facilities, and services.  e. The need for redevelopment, including the renewal of blighted areas and the elimination  of nonconforming uses which are inconsistent with the character of the community.  9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 990 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Temple Shalom Community Facility Subdistrict (PL20180003708)    Exhibit V.D.  Comprehensive Plan Consistency and Statutory Criteria for Plan Amendments    January 16, 2020   Page 4 of 7  JFGNA‐18 Exhibit VD Growth Management‐rev2.docx    Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134  239-947-1144  engineering@gradyminor.com  www.gradyminor.com f. The compatibility of uses on lands adjacent to or closely proximate to military  installations.  g. The compatibility of uses on lands adjacent to an airport as defined in s. 330.35 and  consistent with s. 333.02.  h. The discouragement of urban sprawl.  i. The need for job creation, capital investment, and economic development that will  strengthen and diversify the community’s economy.  j. The need to modify land uses and development patterns within antiquated subdivisions.    The 4.43± acres (Tract 64) is the amount of land required to permit expansion and development  of the social, cultural and religious facilities needed by the Temple and Jewish Federation of  Greater Naples.  The study prepared by the Jewish Federation clearly documents a need for  additional services in greater Naples to serve the growing Jewish population.  This central  location will serve the Jewish community and the sharing of infrastructure and space will  benefit both the Temple and Jewish Federation.    Chapter 163.3177  8. Future land use map amendments shall be based upon the following analyses:   a. An analysis of the availability of facilities and services.  b. An analysis of the suitability of the plan amendment for its proposed use considering  the character of the undeveloped land, soils, topography, natural resources, and historic  resources on site.  c. An analysis of the minimum amount of land needed to achieve the goals and  requirements of this section.    Public water service is available to the site, and wastewater can be accommodated on site.    The balance of the property immediately adjacent to the subject property has been developed  for the Temple, related religious facilities and pre‐school uses, and permitting similar uses on  their property makes logical planning sense and is an efficient use of land in that sharing  existing infrastructure results from the approval of the amendment.    163.3184 Process for adoption of comprehensive plan or plan amendment.    This section of the statute outlines the process and authority for agency review of plan  amendments.  The applicant understands that regional and state reviewing agencies will be  responsible for review of any comprehensive plan amendments per the requirements of  Chapter 163.3184 F.S.   The applicant’s experts are of the opinion that there are no regional or  state impacts associated with the application.   Although the new subdistrict encompasses  13.5± acres, it represents an increase of only 4.3± acres for use by the Temple, as their existing  campus is located on approximately 9± acres of land within the subdistrict.   9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 991 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Temple Shalom Community Facility Subdistrict (PL20180003708)    Exhibit V.D.  Comprehensive Plan Consistency and Statutory Criteria for Plan Amendments    January 16, 2020   Page 5 of 7  JFGNA‐18 Exhibit VD Growth Management‐rev2.docx    Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134  239-947-1144  engineering@gradyminor.com  www.gradyminor.com Project Justification    Temple Shalom is a reform Jewish congregation that emphasizes Jewish worship and learning,  service and community.  It has over 1200 members.  Its 13.5± acre property is located at Golden  Gate Estate Unit 26, tracts 64, 65 & 68, on Pine Ridge Road east of the intersection of Logan  Boulevard and Santa Barbara.  Tracts 65 and 68 are developed and include a synagogue, day  school and parking lot.  Tract 64 is currently undeveloped.      The Jewish Federation of Greater Naples (JFGN) currently resides over a Pet Food store in a  shopping plaza on the southeast corner of Airport Pulling Road and Vanderbilt Beach Road.   The JFGN occupies approximately 3800sf consisting of community space, conference rooms  and administrative offices.  The space is insufficient to meet the current, let alone, future needs  of the growing Jewish community.      JFGN has over 1700 women in its Women’s Cultural Alliance and over 600 men in its Men’s  Cultural Alliance.  These organizations have a number of social, recreational, cultural,  educational and social service initiatives taking place multiple days each week during Naples’  busiest season (October‐April).  In addition, another of JFGN’s activities, the Jewish Book  Festival, hosts 12 book events during season, which attract between 200‐400 attendees per  event.  The Jewish Book Festival needs a more permanent home as it currently leases space in  various venues around Naples.  JFGN’s current facility is simply inadequate to meet these  organization’s immediate space requirements.     In early 2018, the JFGN retained Investment Property Consultants and one of its principals,  Craig Timmins, to assist it in identifying space to lease or buy, or land to purchase to build a  new facility.  JFGN looked at over 40 properties in Greater Naples during its search for an  appropriate property.  Many of these properties were in shopping centers where the landlords  required commercial/consumer tenants.  Others were not large enough or did not have  sufficient parking for JFGN needs.  Land in the center of Greater Naples is over $1MM an acre,  which JFGN could not afford. This search took place from March 2018 until JFGN reached  agreement with Temple Shalom to lease its undeveloped parcel and build a new facility which  will be approximately 22,000 sf. Temple Shalom’s generous offer to lease JFGN the land was  an ideal solution for both parties.     Temple Shalom has owned their property almost 30 years and now wishes to develop the  remaining undeveloped parcel. On January 29, 2019, Temple Shalom membership voted and  approved a Letter of Intent to lease Tract 64 to the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples for 50  years.    9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 992 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Temple Shalom Community Facility Subdistrict (PL20180003708)    Exhibit V.D.  Comprehensive Plan Consistency and Statutory Criteria for Plan Amendments    January 16, 2020   Page 6 of 7  JFGNA‐18 Exhibit VD Growth Management‐rev2.docx    Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134  239-947-1144  engineering@gradyminor.com  www.gradyminor.com Temple Shalom is applying for a PUD and Large Scale Growth Management Plan Amendment  that will allow the construction of a new JFGN building on Tract 64.  At the time the Collier  County BCC approved the conditional use for two of the three tracts (the eastern most land),  Tract 64 was not approved for use because there were no immediate plans for development.  However, Temple Shalom was told that, should it wish to use that land in the future, it should  request conditional use approval from the County.  The Temple is doing so now.    SIC Code 8661 defines Religious Organizations as: “Establishments of religious organizations  operated for worship, religious training, or study, government or administration of an  organized religion, or for promotion of religious activities.”     The mission of JFGN is to enhance and enrich the quality of Jewish life by recognizing and  supporting the charitable, educational, humanitarian and social service needs of the Jewish  community locally, nationally, overseas and in the State of Israel.     Leaders of both Temple Shalom and JFGN believe the mission of the JFGN is similar to that of  Temple Shalom, and that there are many benefits that the proposed campus will provide to  both organizations, the larger Jewish Community and Collier County.     The location of this parcel is also convenient for the participants of the activities run during the  week by the JFGN and its affiliates.  A recent demographic study conducted by Brandeis  University regarding the Jewish community in Greater Naples identified that 30% of Jewish  residents live in lower Lee County and Marco Island, such that locating JFGN’s site close to I‐75  is a significant benefit. The overall population growth east of I‐75 also makes this location a  favorable site.      Temple Shalom believes that, by joining with the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples and  creating a campus environment, it will also benefit from having an enhanced security presence.   JFGN and Temple Shalom are already working with the Collier County Sheriff’s office of  Community Engagement on how to proactively design security for this new proposed campus  and our respective facilities to assure optimal protection.     Lastly, both Temple Shalom and JFGN support the non‐Jewish community as well. Temple  Shalom has been a very good neighbor and contributor to the Naples community.  During  Hurricane Irma, Temple Shalom opened its doors to those in need providing a temporary  respite for many local residents.  Temple Shalom regularly collects food to contribute to local  food pantries, and its annual Mitzvah Day includes many community service efforts for many  organizations in Collier County.  Over the almost 30 years Temple Shalom has been at this  location, there have been no issues with its neighbors.  The JFGN also serves the broader non‐ Jewish community in many ways.  It financially supports the “Shop with the Sherriff” program  9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 993 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Temple Shalom Community Facility Subdistrict (PL20180003708)    Exhibit V.D.  Comprehensive Plan Consistency and Statutory Criteria for Plan Amendments    January 16, 2020   Page 7 of 7  JFGNA‐18 Exhibit VD Growth Management‐rev2.docx    Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134  239-947-1144  engineering@gradyminor.com  www.gradyminor.com which provides Christmas gifts for over 100 disadvantaged youth, and, along with Temple  Shalom, joins with the Catholic Church in holding an annual Jewish‐Catholic dialogue event.   JFGN participates in the Martin Luther Day parade with many other Collier County  organizations, and it is a major funder of the Naples Senior Center, which serves senior citizens  of all religious denominations across the county.     We believe this proposed application to create a campus on Pine Ridge Road serving both  Temple Shalom and the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples will be a significant benefit to  each of our organizations, the overall Jewish community and the greater Naples community  overall.  We look forward to working with Collier County staff to assure that we are meeting  all stakeholder needs as we seek approval of our request.     Conservation and Coastal Management Element:    This project is consistent with Goal 6 of Collier County GMP’s Objective 6.1 Protect native  communities through the application of minimum preservation requirements. Native habitat  has been identified onsite and the required preservation set aside. The area identified qualifies  as native Pine flatwoods.          9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 994 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) MMATTHEW BOXERMATTHEW A. BROOKNERTemple Shalom Community Facility Subdistrict (PL20180003708)Exhibit V.D.1(4)9.A.7.ePacket Pg. 995Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) 2AcknowledgmentsThe Brandeis research team is grateful to the Jewish Federation of Collier County for the opportunity to collaborate to develop and conduct the 2017 Community Study. The study was proposed and sponsored by the Jewish Federation of Collier County, whose staff, Board of Directors, and Community Study Committee provided valuable input on the study design, questionnaire, and report. We are particularly grateful to Executive Director Jeffrey Feld, Board Chair Jane Schiff, and Past Chair Alvin Becker for teaching us about the community and helping ensure that our work would be of the highest quality and utility for the Collier County Jewish community. We also thank the many respondents who completed the survey. Without their willingness to spend time answering numerous questions about their lives, there could be no study.We are deeply grateful for the efforts of our colleagues at the Cohen Center for Modern Jewish Studies, led by Prof. Leonard Saxe, Director of the Cohen Center for Modern Jewish Studies and Steinhardt Social Research Institute. Janet Krasner Aronson provided insight into every step of the project, particularly in developing the survey, creating the sample, and designing the weights. Particular thanks go to Sarah Harpaz, who programmed the survey, managed respondent communications, corresponded with community members, and developed the maps. This project truly would not have gone as smoothly as it did without her ceaseless efforts. We are also appreciative of the assistance provided by our colleagues in programming the survey: Shahar Hecht, Breanna Vizlakh, Naomi Weinblatt, and Matthew Feinberg; and Graham Wright who assisted with respondent communications.We thank the dedicated team of students who worked on various elements of the project. David Manchester, Leora Kagedan, Rachel Gabrilowitz, Tamar Shachaf Schneider, and Jeffrey Hart cleaned mailing and membership lists to prepare the survey sample. Joelle Mark Anthony, Rivka Cohen, Sarah Durkin, Rachel Gabrilowitz, Tommy Gao, Yaoyao Gao, Jeffrey Hart, Mariah Manter, Joana Martin, Izabella Nickel, Tamar Shachaf Schneider, Joanna Spyra, and Melissa Viezel called respondents and administered the survey. Joelle Mark Anthony, Yaoyao Gao, Jeffrey Hart, Leora Kagedan, Mariah Manter, Tamar Shachaf Shneider, Joanna Spyra, and Gal Zahori spent countless hours searching for missing contact information for members of the sample. We thank Yves Bruno and Shay Bar Nissim for their work as the calling supervisors and Lev Paasche‐Orlow and Camille Evans, who worked tirelessly coding responses to open‐ended questions in the survey and formatting data into the Comparison Chart.Finally, we are grateful to Deborah Grant for her editorial advice and feedback, Masha Lokshin for graphic design assistance, and Ilana Friedman for her logistical support throughout the study.9.A.7.ePacket Pg. 996Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) 3Exec SummaryContentsExecutive Summary ......................................................................... 4Findings ………………………………………………………………………………………. 5Population Size and Characteristics ….....……………………………… 5Strengths of the Community……………………………………………….34Gaps in the Community……………………………………………………… 35Future Directions ………………………………………………………………………. 369.A.7.ePacket Pg. 997Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) 4Executive SummaryThe Jewish Federation of Collier County commissioned the first-ever scientific study of the Jewish population of Greater Naples to ensure that there would be accurate, up-to-date data available to help make strategic decisions in the coming years. The study consisted of a representative-sample survey of households that are affiliated in any way with local Jewish organizations, as well as households identified on a market research list that had a higher-than-average probability of being Jewish but were not known in any way to local Jewish organizations. The survey was conducted between February 8, 2017, and May 7, 2017. Overall, 936 households in the Greater Naplesarea completed the survey.The Greater Naples Jewish community is estimated to consist of 5,250 households, of which 4,500 live in Collier County. There are 8,800 Jewish individuals in the community, including 7,550 who live in Collier County. The remainder live in adjacent counties, primarily Lee County, but participate with one or more Jewish organizations in Collier County. About two-fifths of households have another residence; about half of these are in the Northeastern United States and about one-quarter are in the Midwest. About three-quarters of seasonal residents feel connected to the Jewish community where they have their other residence, presenting a challenge to Jewish organizations in Collier County that seek to engage them.The Jewish community of Collier County is largely a retirement community, with nearly two-thirds of the population aged 70 or older. There is potential for growth as Jewish Baby Boomers around the United States, particularly in the Northeast and Midwest, retire and think about moving to warmer climates. However, the older nature of the community also indicates potential for shrinking as elderly residents pass away or move to be closer to children or grandchildren. There are only about 400 Jewish families in the community that are currently raising children.As is typical of an aging community, many households have health challenges. One-fifth include at least one person in fair or poor health, and 13% had at least one health emergency in the past year. Six percent indicated that health challenges had constrained their participation in Jewish life.Although the community is relatively affluent, there are pockets of need. Seven percent of households indicated that they are just getting along, poor, or nearly poor. Similar proportions indicated that they face significant non-medical financial hardships in the past year, would have trouble paying expenses related to an emergency, or that their finances had constrained their participation in Jewish life.Community members enjoy a rich and varied Jewish religious and cultural life, though some seasonal residents reserve their communal religious engagement for the other communities where they live. About half of households have either low or no formal involvement in the organized Jewish community of Collier County. Two-fifths of households currently belong to a Jewish congregation, but only one-quarter belong to a congregation in Collier County. Another two-fifths are former members of a congregation, whether in Collier County or elsewhere; most of these are long-term year-round residents of Naples. Community members engage in wide variety of Jewish ritual and cultural activities throughout the year. Two-fifths of households have someone affiliated with either the Men’s or the Women’s Cultural Alliance (or both). Nearly two-thirdshave been to Israel at least once.The overall perception of community members is that Collier County Jewish organizations work well together and are cooperative, but a lack of resources such as a Jewish community center or cultural center may prevent greater cooperation and greater engagement of community members. Maintaining high-quality care for aging or unwell members of the community and providing services to members of the community with financial needs are also significant challenges.9.A.7.ePacket Pg. 998Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) 5Greater Naples Jewish PopulationGreater NaplesCollier County OnlyJewish Households5,2504,500Adults9,3008,000Jewish Adults8,2006,950Non-Jewish Adults1,1001,050Children800750Jewish Children600600Non-Jewish Children200150Total Individuals10,0008,750Jews8,8007,550Non-Jews1,3001,200Population Size and CharacteristicsGreater Naples Jewish PopulationxAn estimated 7,550 Jews live in 4,500 households in Collier County, including 6,950 adults and 600 children.xAt least 1,250 Jews from adjacent counties, primarily Lee County, live in one of approximately 750 households in which someone is an active participant in or supporter of the Collier County Jewish community.9.A.7.ePacket Pg. 999Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) 6Where Jews LiveJews in Greater NaplesPopulation Size and CharacteristicsWhere do Jews in Greater Naples Live?The Jewish population of Greater Naples is most heavily concentrated in northern Collier County, particularly in ZIP codes 34108, 34109, 34110, and 34119. This area is bounded by the Lee County line in the north, Pine Ridge Road in the south, Collier Boulevard in the east, and the Gulf of Mexico in the west.About 15% of Jewish households in Greater Naples live in Marco Island or adjacent areas.Community Organizations Legend1 Jewish Federation of Collier County,Humanistic Jewish Chavurah2 Holocaust Museum and Education Center of Southwest Florida3 Jewish Family and Community Services of Southwest Florida 4 Beth Tikvah of Naples5 Chabad of Naples Jewish CommunityCenter6 Jewish Congregation of Marco Island7 Naples Jewish Congregation8 Temple ShalomOne dot = 20 Jewish householdsDots randomly placed within ZIP code 9.A.7.ePacket Pg. 1000Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) 7Population Size and CharacteristicsClose-up view of Jewish households in Greater NaplesCommunity Organizations Legend1 Jewish Federation of Collier County,Humanistic Jewish Chavurah2 Holocaust Museum and Education Center of Southwest Florida3 Jewish Family and Community Services of Southwest Florida 4 Beth Tikvah of Naples5 Chabad of Naples Jewish Community Center6 Jewish Congregation of Marco Island7 Naples Jewish Congregation8 Temple ShalomNote: Jewish Congregation of Marco Island not visible in this mapOne dot = 20 Jewish householdsDots randomly placed within ZIP code 9.A.7.ePacket Pg. 1001Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) 8Population Size and Characteristics57%30%14%Year-RoundSeasonal, PrimarySeasonal, SecondaryTenure and Type of ResidenceCommunity members have lived in the Naples area for an average 13.2 yearsxYear-Round: 14.3 yearsxSeasonal, Primary: 11.6 yearsxSeasonal, Secondary: 11.9 years9.A.7.ePacket Pg. 1002Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) 9Population Size and Characteristicsx43% of households (approx. 2,100 overall, 1,700 in Collier County) own multiple homesxPrimarily concentrated in Marco Island, northern Collier County, and southern Lee CountyxThe locations of their second homes: ◊The Northeastern US: 48%◊The Midwestern US: 28%◊Elsewhere in Florida: 12%◊Elsewhere in the Southern US: 4%◊The Western US: 2%◊The rest of the world: 6%x2/3 of seasonal residents consider Greater Naples their primary residencex78% feel connected to the Jewish community where they have the second home; 33% very connectedWhere do seasonal residents live?Community Organizations Legend1 Jewish Federation of Collier County,Humanistic Jewish Chavurah2 Holocaust Museum and Education Center of Southwest Florida3 Jewish Family and Community Services of Southwest Florida 4 Beth Tikvah of Naples5 Chabad of Naples Jewish Community Center6 Jewish Congregation of Marco Island7 Naples Jewish Congregation8 Temple ShalomOne dot = 20 Jewish householdsDots randomly placed within ZIP codeRed•= Seasonal households, primary residenceOrange •= Seasonal households, secondary residenceYellow •= Year-round households9.A.7.ePacket Pg. 1003Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) 10Population Size and CharacteristicsSeasonal residents, close-up viewxSpent on average 7.6 months in the Naples area during the past year◊Seasonal, primary residence is Greater Naples: 8.6 months◊Seasonal, secondary address is Greater Naples: 5.4 monthsx34% plan to increase the time they spend in Greater Naples; 64% do not plan changesxOver half own a burial plot in another community (compared with 22% of year-round residents)Community Organizations Legend1 Jewish Federation of Collier County,Humanistic Jewish Chavurah2 Holocaust Museum and Education Center of Southwest Florida3 Jewish Family and Community Services of Southwest Florida 4 Beth Tikvah of Naples5 Chabad of Naples Jewish Community Center6 Jewish Congregation of Marco Island7 Naples Jewish Congregation8 Temple ShalomNote: Jewish Congregation of Marco Island not visible in this mapOne dot = 20 Jewish householdsDots randomly placed within ZIP codeRed•= Seasonal households, primary residenceOrange •= Seasonal households, secondary residenceYellow •= Year-round households9.A.7.ePacket Pg. 1004Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) 11Ages and Genders of All Residents of Jewish Households1%1%1%1%2%5%14%18%5%< 1%1%3%1%1%2%3%8%21%9%2%Ages 0-9Ages 10-17Ages 18-29Ages 30-39Ages 40-49Ages 50-59Ages 60-69Ages 70-79Ages 80-89Ages 90+MaleFemalePopulation Size and Characteristicsx51% male; 49% femalex6% are minorsx22% are younger than 60x39% are in their 70’sAge and Gender of All Residents of Jewish Households9.A.7.ePacket Pg. 1005Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) 12Ages and Genders of Jewish Residents of Jewish Households1%1%1%1%2%3%12%19%6%< 1%2%2%1%1%2%3%7%24%10%2%Ages 0-9Ages 10-17Ages 18-29Ages 30-39Ages 40-49Ages 50-59Ages 60-69Ages 70-79Ages 80-89Ages 90+MaleFemalex54% male; 46% femalex6% are minorsx20% are younger than 60x43% are in their 70’sPopulation Size and CharacteristicsAge and Gender of Jewish Residents of Jewish Households9.A.7.ePacket Pg. 1006Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) 13Denomination and Marital StatusOrthodox3%Conservative24%Reconstructionist1%Reform49%Renewal<1%Secular/Cultural13%Just Jewish8%Other2%Unmarried31%Inmarried53%Intermarried16%Intermarriage rate = 24%Denomination Marital StatusPopulation Size and Characteristics9.A.7.ePacket Pg. 1007Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) 14Households with ChildrenPopulation Size and Characteristicsx~400 Jewish households with children (including adults in high school) in the Naples area, ~300 raising children as JewsxHeaviest concentration in ZIP codes 34109 and 34119xAbout 250 households enroll their children in some form of Jewish education: pre-school, part-time school, summer camp, youth group, or an Israel trip.Community Organizations Legend1 Jewish Federation of Collier County,Humanistic Jewish Chavurah2 Holocaust Museum and Education Center of Southwest Florida3 Jewish Family and Community Services of Southwest Florida 4 Beth Tikvah of Naples5 Chabad of Naples Jewish Community Center6 Jewish Congregation of Marco Island7 Naples Jewish Congregation8 Temple ShalomOne dot = 20 Jewish householdsDots randomly placed within ZIP codeBlue •= Households with kidsRed•= Households without kids9.A.7.ePacket Pg. 1008Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) 15Households with Children(close-up view)Population Size and CharacteristicsCommunity Organizations Legend1 Jewish Federation of Collier County,Humanistic Jewish Chavurah2 Holocaust Museum and Education Center of Southwest Florida3 Jewish Family and Community Services of Southwest Florida 4 Beth Tikvah of Naples5 Chabad of Naples Jewish Community Center6 Jewish Congregation of Marco Island7 Naples Jewish Congregation8 Temple ShalomNote: Jewish Congregation of Marco Island not visible in this mapOne dot = 20 Jewish householdsDots randomly placed within ZIP codeBlue •= Households with kidsRed•= Households without kids9.A.7.ePacket Pg. 1009Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) 16Population Size and CharacteristicsHealth/Wellnessx20% of households include someone in fair or poor healthx10% of households required counseling or mental health servicesx13% of households required assistance with home maintenancex13% of households had a medical emergency in past yearx6% of households were constrained from Jewish life due to health reasons◊Limited physical mobility◊Inability to access private transportation◊Chronic illnesses◊Terminal diseases9.A.7.ePacket Pg. 1010Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) 17Prosperous15%Very Comfortable47%Reasonably Comfortable31%Just Getting Along5%Nearly Poor1%Poor1%Population Size and CharacteristicsFinancial Well-Beingx6% of households had a significant financial hardship in the past year not related to health issuesx5% could not afford an emergency $400 expensex4% were unable to participate in Jewish life for financial reasonsx85% of adults in Jewish households are retiredxOf respondents who answered a question about household income:◊55% had income of $100,000+◊21% had income of $50,000 to $99,999◊20% had income of $25,000 to $49,999◊5% had income under $25,0009.A.7.ePacket Pg. 1011Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) 18Synagogue Membersx42% of households (40% in Collier County) currently belong to a synagogue, minyan, chavurah, or other Jewish congregationx26% of households belong to a congregation in Collier Countyx23% of households belong to congregations outside of Collier CountyPopulation Size and CharacteristicsOne dot = 20 Jewish householdsDots randomly placed within ZIP codeBlue •= Members of Collier County congregationsRed•= Non-members of Collier County congregations9.A.7.ePacket Pg. 1012Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) 19Note: Jewish Congregation of Marco Island not visible in this mapOne dot = 20 Jewish householdsDots randomly placed within ZIP codeBlue •= Members of Collier County congregationsRed•= Non-members of Collier County congregationsPopulation Size and CharacteristicsSynagogue Members(close-up view)x40% of households used to belong to a congregation somewhere but no longer do◊75% of these are year-round residents and 25% are seasonal residents◊71% have been in Naples 10+ years9.A.7.ePacket Pg. 1013Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) 20Never29%< Monthly53%Monthly +, 18%Attended ServicesPopulation Size and CharacteristicsRitual Practicesx51% attended High Holiday servicesx43% fasted on Yom Kippur (11% could not fast)x41% lit Shabbat candles at least sometimes, 8% alwaysx81% attended or hosted a Passover sederx77% lit Chanukah candlesx21% follow some form of kosher rules◊3% keep kosher at home only◊2% keep kosher at all times9.A.7.ePacket Pg. 1014Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) 2150%36%24%21%10%4%36%25%34%28%11%14%14%39%42%51%79%82%0%20%40%60%80%100%Discussed JewishTopicsSearched Online forJewish InformationAte Jewish Foods Accessed JewishCultureStudied Jewish Text Attended ShabbatMealNeverAt Least OnceWeekly or MorePopulation Size and CharacteristicsMonthly Participation in Jewish Activities9.A.7.ePacket Pg. 1015Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) 22Population Size and CharacteristicsMen’s and Women’s Cultural Alliancesx38% of households say that at least one member belongs to the Men’s Cultural Alliance or the Women’s Cultural Alliance xMember households are more likely to be seasonal residents and newer to NaplesOne dot = 20 Jewish householdsDots randomly placed within ZIP codeBlue •= Belong to the MCA/WCARed•= Do not belong to MCA/WCA9.A.7.ePacket Pg. 1016Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) 23Men’s and Women’s Cultural Alliances (close-up view)xMCA/WCA are big draws for Lee County residentsxMCA/WCA offer great potential for additional outreach to unaffiliated, seasonal residents, and people living farther from institutional center of the communityNote: Jewish Congregation of Marco Island not visible in this mapOne dot = 20 Jewish householdsDots randomly placed within ZIP codeBlue •= Belong to the MCA/WCARed•= Do not belong to MCA/WCAPopulation Size and Characteristics9.A.7.ePacket Pg. 1017Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) 2444%59%69%49%64%73%57%64%81%0%20%40%60%80%100%Pays Dues Participated in Program Read MaterialNaplesSecond HomeOverallPopulation Size and CharacteristicsParticipation in Jewish Organizations9.A.7.ePacket Pg. 1018Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) 2516%21%14%17%21%7%23%28%16%0%5%10%15%20%25%30%Leadership Role Support Service As ParticipantNaplesSecond HomeOverallPopulation Size and CharacteristicsVolunteering for and with Jewish Organizations9.A.7.ePacket Pg. 1019Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) 26Donors to the Naples Jewish community support these organizations:Jewish Federation of Collier County60%A local synagogue55%JFCS of Southwest Florida23%A Jewish school or camp13%Other Jewish groups (e.g., the Holocaust Museum, Israel organizations, Hadassah, the ADL)51%Population Size and Characteristicsx92% donated to any organizationx80% donated to at least one Jewish organizationx57% donated to at least one Jewish organization in the Naples areax58% received a donation request from a Jewish organization in Greater Naplesx4% are leaving a bequest to a Naples Jewish organizationPhilanthropic Participation9.A.7.ePacket Pg. 1020Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) 27Population Size and CharacteristicsCommunity InvolvementxInvolvement in the Collier County Jewish community was determined by:◊Membership in Local Jewish Organizations (synagogues, MCA/WCA, other local Jewish organizations and groups)◊Participation in Local Jewish Organizations (attending programs, reading materials, paying dues)◊Support of Local Jewish Organizations (donations, volunteering)xHouseholds are broken down into:◊No Involvement: 28%◊Low Involvement: 26%◊Moderate Involvement: 31%◊High Involvement: 15%9.A.7.ePacket Pg. 1021Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) 28Community Involvement, High Involvement Versus All OthersPopulation Size and CharacteristicsxHigh-involvement households are distributed throughout the Greater Naples area, but are most heavily concentrated in northern Collier CountyxA substantial number of high-involvement households also come from Southern Lee CountyOne dot = 20 Jewish householdsDots randomly placed within ZIP codeBlue •= High involvement levelsRed•= Moderate, low, or no involvement levels9.A.7.ePacket Pg. 1022Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) 29Community Involvement, No Formal Involvement Versus All OthersPopulation Size and CharacteristicsNo‐involvement households are distributed throughout the Greater Naples area but are in highest concentration in outlying areas, away from the institutional center of the communityOne dot = 20 Jewish householdsDots randomly placed within ZIP codeBlue •= No formal involvementRed•= High, moderate, or low involvement levels9.A.7.ePacket Pg. 1023Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) 3073%57%46%42%100%95%85%82%0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%CultureEthnicityReligionCommunityAnyVery MuchPopulation Size and Characteristics“To you personally, to what extent is being Jewish a matter of…”9.A.7.ePacket Pg. 1024Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) 3147%25%33%33%14%25%6%17%0%20%40%60%80%100%Global NaplesNot at AllA LittleSomewhatVery MuchPopulation Size and CharacteristicsFeels Part of Jewish Communities9.A.7.ePacket Pg. 1025Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) 32100%99% 99%92%89%76% 76%45%0%20%40%60%80%100%Around the World In the United States On US College Campuses In Greater NaplesAny ConcernVery Much ConcernedPopulation Size and CharacteristicsConcerned about Antisemitism9.A.7.ePacket Pg. 1026Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) 33Never38%Once27%Multiple Times32%Once Lived There3%Past Travel to IsraelPopulation Size and Characteristics39% of Jews have friends or family in Israel80% feel at least a little connected to Israel; 49% feel very much connected79% sought news about Israel at least once a month; 20% at least daily19% traveled to Israel on a mission sponsored by a Jewish organization; 28% would be interested in oneConnections to Israel9.A.7.ePacket Pg. 1027Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) 34Strengths of the Community“We are very happy with the Jewish community in the way they band together during times of stress.”“I have seen Naples go from a community that didn't want to accept Jews to a thriving Jewish community of various religious and civic organizations, because the Jews who were and are here were and are willing to work together for the common good of all Jews.”“There is a very healthy relationship between the Naples Jewish community and all other religious affiliations in the greater Naples area.”“We have seen the organizations expand and grow to serve the change in population. The people here are wonderful and seem to care about their fellow Jews.”9.A.7.ePacket Pg. 1028Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) 35Gaps in the Community“The community would benefit from more community-wide activities. There are so few Jews here we need to have a better feeling of who we are.”“The lack of a single JCC prevents young families and teens from having a single gathering place.”“There are many situations regarding meeting the needs for our aging parents and grandparents, [and] those with intellectual challenges, and the need for their long-term living needs as they survive their aging caregivers.”“There is no innovative programming in this community.”“It would be wonderful if they had people offering to pick people up and take them to events.”9.A.7.ePacket Pg. 1029Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) 36Future DirectionsxDifficult to project whether community will grow or shrink◊Dependent on health of extant community, health of local economy, real estate prices throughout Southern Florida, and ability to attract young families◊Possible indicators: tracking enrollment in Hebrew schools, participation in youth group, older members of the community who move away to be closer to children and grandchildrenxGreater outreach to seasonal residents is indicated◊MCA/WCA are opportunity for engagementxConsider Federation mission to Israel9.A.7.ePacket Pg. 1030Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) 2017 MATTHEW BOXER | MATTHEW A. BROOKNER COLLIER COUNTY JEWISH COMMUNITY STUDY THE STRENGTH OF A PEOPLE THE POWER OF A COMMUNITY d,E/>WWE/^ 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1031 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices Table of Contents Appendix A: Methodology ............................................................................................................................ 1 Appendix B: Survey Instrument and Codebook .......................................................................................... 13 Appendix C: Study Documentation ........................................................................................................... 128 Appendix D: Maps ..................................................................................................................................... 171 Appendix E: Comparison Charts................................................................................................................ 180 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1032 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Appendix A: Methodology 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 1 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1033 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Overview CMJS developed innovative methods to estimate the size and characteristics of the Collier County Jewish community. As survey techniques have become more refined, the barriers to reaching respondents have become increasingly difficult to overcome. Researchers typically experience limitations in reaching respondents due to the proliferation of survey research, the prevalence of cell phones, and caller ID/blocking. Because the likelihood of reaching someone in the target population depends upon the size of that group relative to the population as a whole, low-incidence populations are particularly hard to reach using the traditional method of random digit dialing (RDD). To address these barriers, CMJS utilized a research design that incorporated two innovations: x Data from an extended sample of email-only respondents x Organizational data to correct for sampling bias The research design for the Collier County Jewish Community Study utilized random sampling from an identified frame, or list, of the known population. The Jewish Federation of Collier County provided membership or mailing lists of some community organizations, while other organizations provided their own lists. These lists were combined with a purchased list of likely Jewish households within the geographic area and were then deduplicated. The combined list constituted the sampling frame from which a primary random sample of households was drawn. Because this primary sample was a random selection from the overall frame, it is assumed to be representative of the entire frame. For that reason, data collected from the random sample were used to estimate overall population characteristics. To supplement the primary random sample, a second sample was drawn from a frame consisting of the remaining households who had an email address. Information from these households increased the amount of data available from populations of interest and allowed for more detailed analysis of the characteristics of the community. The methodology is described as follows: 1. Sampling frame 2. Sample design 3. Survey instrument and data collection 4. Field procedures 5. Weighting 6. Analysis 7. Margin of error 8. Bias and limitations 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 2 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1034 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) 1. Sampling Frame The 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study implemented a dual-mode Internet and telephone survey to reach year-round and seasonal residents of the Collier County area. In the absence of an area probability or RDD frame, we began to build a sampling frame from the combined mailing lists of Jewish organizations in the area. The names of the organizations included in the lists are shown in Table A1. Table A1. Composition of strata Number Type Organization 1 Children BBYO Temple Shalom Preschool 2 Synagogue Beth Tikvah of Naples Chabad Jewish Congregation of Marco Island Naples Jewish Congregation Temple Shalom 3 Adults 1 BBYO Friends and Neighbors Hadassah 4 Adults 2 Holocaust Museum Jewish Federation of Collier County 5 Ethnic names/behavior Infogroup Lists from strata 3 and 4 were separated on the basis of expected proportions of ineligible (i.e., out-of-area or non-Jewish) households on the list. Lists with expected low proportions of ineligible households were assigned to stratum 3, and lists with expected high proportions of ineligible households were assigned to stratum 4. In order to find any Jewish-connected households not already known to the organized Jewish community, a list of possible Jewish households was purchased from a commercial data broker, Infogroup, and was added to the sample. This list identified households based on their geography, and then further restricted households to those with Jewish last names, first names, or behavioral characteristics. The “ethnic names/behavior list,” consisted of 5,751 households that were identified as likely to include someone who was Hebrew-speaking or Jewish by ethnicity, ethnic group, or religion. Those households that appeared on this list and no organizational list — 5,008 households—represented the “unaffiliated” Jewish community. The organizational and purchased lists were combined, cleaned, and deduplicated to ensure that no unique household appeared on the list more than once. Households without any mailing address were removed from the sampling frame because they could not be fully identified. The combined sampling frame consisted of 11,180 households. 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 3 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1035 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) 2. Sample Design The households in the sampling frame were divided into five groupings, called strata, based on expected characteristics of the household inferred from the household’s appearance on organizational lists. The composition of the five strata is shown in Table A2. Households that appeared on multiple lists were placed in the lowest-number strata for which they were eligible; for example, a household appearing on a synagogue list (stratum 2), an adults 1 list (stratum 3), and the ethnic names/behavior list (stratum 5) would be assigned to stratum 2. Each of the strata was further divided into two sub-strata based on availability of an email address. Households with an email address were eligible to be included in the email-only supplement but households with no email address were not eligible. Therefore, each stratum was subdivided into email and no-email sub-strata. A primary sample of 2,485 potential respondents was randomly selected from the two sub-strata within the five different strata (Table A2). The sampling rate of each stratum was designed to oversample likely Jewish households and likely households with children in order to maximize the representation of those groups within the final sample. Following selection of the sample, an email-only supplement was identified. This sample frame of 2,391 households for the email supplement included all households in the email sub-strata that were not selected into the primary sample. A survey invitation was sent to one email address for each household followed by up to five email reminders. If ema il messages “bounced” or were undeliverable, another email address from the same household (if available) was substituted. The combination of the primary sample and the email-only supplement is referred to as the “full sample.” 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 4 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1036 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Table A2. Sample size by strata Strata number Description Frame size Primary sample Email-only supplement 1 Children Total 82 60 6 Email 53 39 No Email 29 21 2 Synagogue Total 1,162 607 465 Email 1,027 544 No Email 135 63 3 Adults 1 Total 694 368 159 Email 377 202 No Email 317 166 4 Adults 2 Total 4,237 763 1,761 Email 2,212 404 No Email 2,025 359 5 Ethnic Names Total 5,008 687 0 Email 0 0 No Email 5,008 687 Total 11,180 2,485 2,391 3. Survey Instrument and Data Collection The survey instrument was designed in collaboration with a special advisory committee of The Jewish Federation of Collier County. The questions were crafted to minimize potential bias and any burden on respondents. Where possible, questions, language, and definitions were adopted from previously published Jewish community survey questionnaires, allowing for greater confidence in their reliability. Two modes of data collection were utilized: online and telephone. The online and telephone instruments were identical—when a survey was completed over the phone, the telephone interviewer would fill out the online version. The questionnaire was divided into two parts, a screener and the survey itself. The screener section was asked of all respondents to determine eligibility. Any household in the sample was considered eligible if it contained at least one adult aged 18 or older who lived in Greater Naples for at least part of the year and considered him- or herself to be Jewish. A total of 1,182 households completed the screener and of those, 936 were screened into the survey. Twenty respondents were initially screened into the survey but after inspection of responses were determined to include no Jewish adults or adults who were Messianic Jews and therefore ineligible for the survey.1 Accordingly, the final achieved sample consisted of 916 households. 1 Messianic Jews claim Jewish identity, but their claim is typically rejected by the vast majority of the Jewish community. For purposes of this study, respondents who identified as Messianic Jews were treated as non-Jews. 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 5 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1037 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Qualifying households proceeded to the main survey, which included sections on basic sociodemographic information, engagement in Jewish life, and perceptions of various aspects of Jewish communal life in Collier County. In order to minimize the burden on respondents, a series of complex skip patterns (“branching ”) were created to ensure that respondents were only asked questions that pertained to their specific life situation or experience. Thus, for example, a household with no children would not be asked questions about choice of schools and camps. The amount of time required to complete the survey varied for all respondents, regardless of mode of completion, depending on household composition and the degree of detail respondents were willing to offer for open-ended questions. The survey instrument is presented in the form of a codebook in Appendix B. 4. Field Procedures Prenotification letters were mailed to the primary sample of 2,485 households on February 8, 2017. These letters explained the purpose of the survey and provided each household with a unique link to complete the survey independently online. Households for which one or more e- mail addresses were available also received these letters electronically on February 13-14, 2017. A sample of the prenotification letter is shown in Appendix C. After two days, households that had not completed the survey were contacted by telephone. The primary goal of telephone contact was to administer the survey over the phone if the respondent was unable or unwilling to complete the survey online, or if the respondent simply preferred to complete the survey over the phone. If the respondent was unwilling to complete the survey over the phone at the time of the call, he or she was asked for a better time to be called again or for an email address to re-send the link to the survey online. Calling began on February 15, 2017, starting with the households for which phone numbers were available. Calling concluded on April 26, 2017. Seven email reminders were sent for all non-completed surveys on February 27, March 9, March 21, March 30, April 6, April 14, and April 20. Calls were conducted by CMJS. Callers were trained in the techniques of telephone interviewing and the specifics of this survey. Callers made up to five attempts to reach all households in the primary sample who did not complete the survey online in response to email requests or who did not have email addresses. Callers offered to conduct survey interviews over the telephone or, if requested, to send the household members their unique link to complete the survey online at their convenience. Households were contacted repeatedly at different days and times to determine whether available contact information was correct. Households whose available contact information was confirmed to be outdated, who had no contact information, and those for whom the status was uncertain were searched in online public records databases to find updated information. Research assistants searched for additional contact information and added phone numbers to the calling list as they were identified. 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 6 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1038 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) The supplementary sample was conducted as an email-only survey that was not accompanied by prenotification letters or phone calls. The survey instrument for the email sample was identical to the one used for the primary sample. Email invitations were sent to the 2,391 households in the email supplement for strata 1-4 on February 21, 2017. Five follow-up emails were sent on March 2, March 14, March 24, April 3, and April 20. Data collection ended on May 7, 2017. In the primary sample, 841 households completed the screener; of those, 539 were screened into the full survey. Additionally, 20 households were identified in which all members of the household were deceased, and six households were identified in the course of fielding the survey as previously unrecognized duplicates of other households in the sample. These households were removed from the sample, reducing the primary sample size to 2,459. The overall response rate was 34.2% for the primary sample (AAPOR RR2). In the supplementary sample, 524 households completed the screener; of those, 397 were screened into the full survey. Two households were removed from the supplementary sample after being identified as previously unrecognized duplicates of other households in the sample, reducing the supplementary sample size to 2,389. The overall response rate was 21.9% for the supplementary sample (AAPOR RR2). For the combined primary plus supplementary sample, 1,365 households completed the screener, and of those, 936 were screened into the full survey, yielding an overall response rate of 28.3% (AAPOR RR2). 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 7 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1039 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Table A3. Response rate by strata for primary sample (AAPOR RR2) Strata Primary sample size Deceased or duplicate Adjusted primary sample size Complete, screened in Complete, screened out Response rate 1 Children 60 0 60 19 5 38.3% 2 Synagogues 607 1 606 295 24 52.6% 3 Adults 1 368 5 363 88 42 35.4% 4 Adults 2 763 10 753 120 113 30.6% 5 Ethnic Names 687 10 677 17 118 19.8% Total 2,485 26 2,459 539 302 33.9% 5. Weighting Overview of weighting procedures used The purpose of developing survey weights for the sample is to adjust the survey data so that they will represent the population from which they were drawn. This is done in two ways: base weights, which are based on sample design, and poststratification weights, which are adjustments to external benchmarks. For base weights, the data are adjusted to match the sampling frame by calculating the strata- specific probabilities of selection into the sample and rates of response. By adjusting weights upwards for respondents from strata in which households were less likely to be selected or to respond, and adjusting weights downward for respondents from strata in which households were more likely to be selected or to respond, the resulting weights adjust the data to match the frame from which they were drawn. Poststratification, the second phase of weighting, adjusts the data to match known population parameters. In this case, the known parameters that were utilized were the number of children currently enrolled in Jewish pre-schools and part-time schools, and the number of synagogue member units. After applying the base weights, the sample is adjusted again to match these parameters. This step yields the primary sample weights for households and respondents. The weighted primary sample was used to estimate the size of the population for multiple categories of religious identity. Subsequently, the primary sample was combined with the email- only sample to yield the full sample. At the end of the process, a data file was created with one record per adult. In this file, each record has six weights: 1) wthhprim: the weight of the household for the primary sample 2) wthhfull: the weight of the household for the full sample 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 8 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1040 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) 3) wtrespprim: the respondent’s individual weight for the primary sample (equivalent to the household weight) 4) wtrespfull: the respondent’s individual weight for the full sample (equivalent to the household weight) 5)wtindprim: each household adult’s individual weight for the primary sample 6)wtindfull: each household adult’s individual weight for the full sample Design and base weights Base weights are calculated as the product of the design weight (inverse of the probability of selection into the sample) and the nonresponse weight (inverse of the probability of responding after being selected into the sample). For the primary sample, data were weighted separately within each sub-stratum by the probability of selection into the sample (design weights) and nonresponse. To calculate the design weight, the preliminary frame size was adjusted to account for the presumed ineligibility of a proportion of the households in the sample frame. Ineligible households identified during the data collection period of the survey are those households that are found to be duplicates, deceased, or infirm. The adjusted frame size for each stratum was calculated as: Adjusted frame size = Frame size × (Number eligible households ÷ Number selected households) The design weight for each stratum was calculated as: Design weight = Adjusted frame size ÷ Number eligible households Respondents were those who partially or fully completed the survey. Partial surveys were those in which the screening data were completed (whether the respondent was screened in or out). The nonresponse weight for each stratum was calculated as: Nonresponse weight = Number eligible households ÷ Number respondent households The base weight is calculated by multiplying the design weight by the nonresponse weight: Base weight = Design weight × Nonresponse weight Poststratification and mode effect correction In order to adjust the sample to account for the known population of Jews in the Collier County area, the process of poststratification was used. Jewish institutions in Collier County provided estimates of 70 children in Jewish pre-schools, 170 children in Jewish part-time schools, 815 household member units at five of the six local synagogues, and 1,700 household member units of the Men’s and Women’s Cultural Alliances. A correction was also applied to correct for mode 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 9 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1041 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) effects, correcting for systematic bias introduced by respondents’ propensities to complete the survey by phone or over the Internet. The results of poststratification yielded the primary household weight. Combining the primary and email-only sample To combine the primary and email sample, propensity score weighting was used (Lee & Valliant, 2009).2 This method addressed the concern that respondents who completed the survey based solely on email invitations were more motivated, or had a greater “propensity to respond,” than those in the primary sample who received letters, phone calls, and email messages. If that were the case, the email sample would be biased; that is, respondents from the email sample would be likely to be more Jewishly connected than those in the primary sample. The propensity score yields an adjustment factor that is multiplied by the base weight to get the combined weights of the two samples. The base weight for the primary sample was calculated as described above. The base weight of the email sample was set to 1 because all respondents with email addresses had a 100% probability of being selected into the email sample. Propensity score weighting uses logistic regression to determine the probability of responding in the primary sample compared to the email-only sample, based on characteristics that might be correlated with response probability. A logistic regression model was run of the probability of being in either achieved sample based on the following correlated variables: x Respondent being Jewish x Respondent denomination x Having a child x Synagogue member x Ever going to services x Connection to the local Jewish community x Ever been to Israel x Health problems x Intermarried Other variables, including age, gender, and seasonal residency, were tested but were not found to be significant predictors of response probability. After running the model, the response propensities for each respondent were divided into quintiles, and each respondent was assigned to the appropriate quintile, 1 through 5. Within each quintile, an adjustment factor for base weights was calculated using the following formula, following Lee and Valliant (2009, p. 325). 2 Lee, S., & Valliant, R. (2009). Estimation for volunteer panel web surveys using propensity score adjustment and calibration adjustment. Sociological Methods & Research, 37(3), 319-343 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 10 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1042 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Where fc is the adjustment factor for quintile c within each strata subset NRc is the number of respondents in quintile c in the primary sample (reference) NWc is the number of respondents in quintile c in the email-only sample (web) NR is the number of respondents in the primary sample (reference) NW is the number of respondents in the email-only sample (web) The final weight for each household was the base weight multiplied by the adjustment factor. Individual and respondent weights The individual weights were used to estimate characteristics—but not counts—of the entire adult population (e.g., gender, age, etc.). The data file was converted so there would be one record per adult in each household, duplicating the respondent’s record the appropriate number of times. (For example, a household with three adults would have three records.) Each individual’s weight was set as the household weight. The respondent’s weight was also the household weight, but was labeled as such for simplicity during analysis. 6. Analysis Analyses were conducted of Jewish households (households with at least one Jewish adult), as well as individual Jewish adults and Jewish children who were specifically identified by respondents as being Jewish. All analyses were completed using statistical software Stata, version 14. Analysis of demographic data was based only on the primary random sample with appropriate weights applied. All analyses of attitudinal and behavioral data, as well as all subgroup analysis, were conducted using the full sample with appropriate weights applied. 7. Margin of Error Many studies report a margin of error instead of reporting confidence intervals. The margin of error is the 95% confidence interval that would be expected if all survey respondents had answered a question, if there were only two response choices, if about half gave each response, and if the survey design had used a simple random sample. Additionally, the margin of error is only applicable to percentages, not to totals or means. In our sample, with 539 respondents in the primary sample representing a total population of 8,800 Jewish individuals and 5,250 Jewish households, the margin of error would have been ±4%. However, because the assumptions around a margin of error statistic are violated, this study relies upon the confidence intervals generated individually around each estimate. 8. Bias and Limitations Every effort to create a representative sample was made in order to prevent bias or, where bias was unavoidable, to identify and reduce it. Nevertheless, some groups were particularly likely to 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 11 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1043 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) be underrepresented in the sample. Most significant among these were unaffiliated Jews (including new residents and intermarried families) and young adult Jews. Young adult Jews were also likely undercounted for other reasons. Young adults in general are notoriously difficult to reach for telephone surveys, in part due to the increasing rate of cell phone-only households and in part because they tend to move more frequently than older adults; both conditions render young adults harder to track. Newcomers who are not known to the community were very likely undercounted, though they may have appeared on the ethnic names list. Given the high rates of seasonal residency in Collier County, this is made all the more difficult—some households spend as little as one or two months in the area each year, and as such may not be on the radar of local Jewish organizations. Interfaith families may also been underrepresented to the extent that they were unaffiliated and resided in households with directory listings that did not fit the selected ethnic name parameters. Economically disadvantaged families may have been underrepresented due to lack of affiliation. 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 12 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1044 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Appendix B: Survey Instrument and Codebook 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 13 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1045 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Thursday July 13 12:12:53 2017 Page 1 ___ ____ ____ ____ ____(R) /__ / ____/ / ____/ ___/ / /___/ / /___/ Statistics/Data Analysis name:<u nna m ed> log:Z :\Na p les -C o lli e r C o unt y \Re p ort \6-C o deb o ok &In s tru m ent \Cod e boo k -s crl i ve.s mcl log type:s m cl opened on:1 3 Ju l 20 1 7,1 2:1 0 :41 1 . ********* 2 . 3 . *Screener 4 . 5 . ********* 6 . note l scrlive sc r liv e : 1. Do you live in the Greater Naples area for any part of the year? 7 . tab scrlive Screener: Live in Naples Freq. Percent Cum. No 1 3 9 10.7 1 10.7 1 Yes 1,1 5 9 89.2 9 1 00.0 0 Total 1,2 9 8 1 00.0 0 8 . log close name:<u nna m ed> log:Z :\Na p les -C o lli e r C o unt y \Re p ort \6-C o deb o ok &In s tru m ent \Cod e boo k -s crl i ve.s mcl log type:s m cl closed on:1 3 Ju l 20 1 7,1 2:1 0 :52 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 14 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1046 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) WhatistheZIPcodeofyourGreaterNaplesaddress?   ResponseUnweightedn 33901<10 33908<10 33912<10 33913<10 33914<10 33919<10 3392838 33957<10 33967<10 3410222 3410346 3410421 3410562 34106<10 34108148 34109110 3411093 3411225 3411323 3411440 34116<10 34117<10 34119132 3412031 3413436 3413547 34142<10 34143<10 3414553  OutofArea200  Total1,155  2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 15 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1047 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:23 2017 Page 1 ___ ____ ____ ____ ____(R) /__ / ____/ / ____/ ___/ / /___/ / /___/ Statistics/Data Analysis HH Jewish Freq. Percent Cum. name: <u nna m ed> log: Z :\Na p les -C o lli e r C o unt y \Re p ort \6-C o deb o ok &In s tru m ent \Cod e boo k -F req u enc i es.s mcl log type: s m cl opened on: 1 2 Se p 20 1 7,0 9:3 5 :48 1 . 2 . ********* 3 . *Screener (cont.) 4 . ********* 5 . foreach x of varlist scrconjew scrparjew { 2 . note l `x' 3 . tab `x' 4 . } sc r con j ew: 1. Do you or any other adult in your household consider themselves to be Jewish? Screener: Anyone in HH Jewish Freq. Percent Cum. No 2 5 1 21.7 3 21.7 3 Yes 9 0 4 78.2 7 1 00.0 0 Total 1,1 5 5 1 00.0 0 sc r par j ew: 1. Do you or any adult in your household have a Jewish parent or were raised Jewish? Screener: Anyone in HH Jewish parent Freq. Percent Cum. No 2 3 3 92.8 3 92.8 3 Yes 1 8 7.1 7 1 00.0 0 Total 2 5 1 1 00.0 0 6 . 7 . ********* 8 . *Household Counts 9 . ********* 10 . foreach x of varlist hhadnum hhchnum { 2 . note l `x' 3 . svy: tab `x', per format (%20.0fc) stubw(30) obs 4 . } hh a dnu m : 1. How many adults (age 18 or older) usually live in your household -- including yourself? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 905 Number of PSUs = 905 Population size =5,5 16.0 994 Design df = 896 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 16 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1048 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:24 2017 Page 2 Count HH adults percentage obs 1 2 3 18 0 2 7 5 69 1 3 1 2 5 4 1 8 5 0 1 Total 10 0 90 5 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns hh c hnu m : 1. How many children (age 17 or younger) usually live in your household? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 906 Number of PSUs = 906 Population size =5,5 27.7 176 Design df = 897 Count HH children percentage obs 0 9 3 83 5 1 1 1 7 2 4 3 3 3 1 1 6 4 0 4 5 0 1 Total 10 0 90 6 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns 11 . 12 . ********* 13 . *Respondent 14 . ********* 15 . 16 . foreach x of varlist respgender respage_dec respedu respdenom respdaysch respptsch respcamp respyg respb 2 . note l `x' 3 . svy, subpop(respjewish): tab `x', per format (%20.0fc) stubw(30) obs 4 . } (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 894 Number of PSUs = 894 Population size =5,3 68.4 799 Subpop. no. obs =892 Subpop. size =5,3 60.2 976 Design df = 885 R gender percentage obs Male 5 4 41 1 Female 4 6 48 1 Total 10 0 89 2 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 17 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1049 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:24 2017 Page 3 re s pag e _de c : 1. How old are you? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 872 Number of PSUs = 872 Population size =5,3 04.9 208 Subpop. no. obs =870 Subpop. size =5,2 96.7 384 Design df = 863 RECODE of respage (R age) percentage obs 20-29 yrs 0 5 30-39 yrs 2 1 5 40-49 yrs 4 3 9 50-59 yrs 6 6 3 60-69 yrs 2 1 21 8 70-79 yrs 4 4 36 3 80-89 yrs 1 9 15 8 90+ yrs 4 9 Total 10 0 87 0 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns re s ped u : 1. What is the highest level of schooling you have completed? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 868 Number of PSUs = 868 Population size =5,2 96.7 531 Subpop. no. obs =866 Subpop. size =5,2 88.5 708 Design df = 859 R highest schooling percentage obs Less than high school 0 1 High school 1 6 Some college or technical degr 1 0 6 3 Associate or technical degree 3 2 3 Bachelor's degree 3 0 26 4 Master's degree 3 0 27 8 Doctorate or professional degr 2 5 22 6 Other 0 5 Total 10 0 86 6 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 893 Number of PSUs = 893 Population size =5,3 55.8 998 Subpop. no. obs =891 Subpop. size =5,3 47.7 175 Design df = 884 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 18 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1050 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:24 2017 Page 4 R denomination percentage obs Orthodox 3 3 6 Conservative 2 3 24 0 Reconstructionist 1 9 Reform 4 9 47 7 Renewal 0 2 Secular/Cultural 1 4 7 6 Just Jewish 8 4 4 Other 3 7 Total 10 0 89 1 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns re s pda y sch : 1. [During grades K-12, did you ever do any of the following?] Attend a Jewish day school (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 847 Number of PSUs = 847 Population size =5,2 20.4 805 Subpop. no. obs =845 Subpop. size =5,2 12.2 982 Design df = 838 R went to day school percentage obs No 8 4 74 6 Yes 1 6 9 9 Total 10 0 84 5 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns re s ppt s ch: 1. [During grades K-12, did you ever do any of the following?] Attend a supplementary Jewish school, li (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 851 Number of PSUs = 851 Population size =5,2 40.2 773 Subpop. no. obs =849 Subpop. size =5 ,232 .095 Design df = 842 R went to part-time school percentage obs No 2 2 16 5 Yes 7 8 68 4 Total 10 0 84 9 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns re s pca m p: 1. [During grades K-12, did you ever do any of the following?] Attend a Jewish day or overnight camp (running tabulate on estimation sample) 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 19 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1051 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:24 2017 Page 5 Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 847 Number of PSUs = 847 Population size =5,1 85.3 346 Subpop. no. obs =845 Subpop. size =5,1 77.1 523 Design df = 838 R went to Jewish camp percentage obs No 6 3 49 3 Yes 3 7 35 2 Total 10 0 84 5 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns re s pyg : 1. [During grades K-12, did you ever do any of the following?] Participate in a Jewish youth group (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 846 Number of PSUs = 846 Population size =5,2 17.8 474 Subpop. no. obs =844 Subpop. size =5,2 09.6 651 Design df = 837 R was in youth group percentage obs No 5 3 37 1 Yes 4 7 47 3 Total 10 0 84 4 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 861 Number of PSUs = 861 Population size =5,2 73.0 066 Subpop. no. obs =859 Subpop. size =5,2 64.8 243 Design df = 852 R had bar/bat mitzvah percentage obs No 4 0 32 8 Yes, as a child 5 5 46 6 Yes, as an adult 4 6 5 Total 10 0 85 9 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 20 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1052 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:24 2017 Page 6 17 . 18 . di "All Respondents" Al l Re s pon d ent s 19 . foreach x of varlist resprelig respcons resppar resprelrsd respconvert { 2 . note l `x' 3 . svy: tab `x', per format(%20.0fc) stubw(30) obs 4 . } (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 890 Number of PSUs = 890 Population size =5 ,353 .896 Design df = 881 R religion percentage obs Jewish 9 4 86 8 Jewish + Else 1 1 1 Christian 0 1 Buddhist 0 1 Atheist 1 6 Agnostic 3 2 Other 1 1 Total 10 0 89 0 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns re s pco n s: 1. Aside from religion, do you consider yourself Jewish? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 5 Number of obs = 15 Number of PSUs = 15 Population size =25 5 .82 7 075 Design df = 10 R consider self Jewish percentage obs Yes 10 0 1 5 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. re s ppa r : 1. Were either of your parents Jewish? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 886 Number of PSUs = 886 Population size =5,3 42.7 172 Design df = 877 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 21 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1053 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:24 2017 Page 7 R's parents Jewish percentage obs No 1 2 6 Yes, mother 2 1 8 Yes, father 6 2 0 Yes, mother and father 9 0 82 2 Total 10 0 88 6 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns re s pre l rsd : 1 . W ere you rai s ed… (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 881 Number of PSUs = 881 Population size =5,2 86.5 165 Design df = 872 R religion raised percentage obs Jewish 9 3 83 1 Jewish and something else 1 7 Another religion 4 2 5 No religion 2 1 8 Total 10 0 88 1 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns re s pco n ver t : 1. Did you have a formal conversion to Judaism? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 4 Number of obs = 25 Number of PSUs = 25 Population size =70 .242 4 108 Design df = 21 R converted percentage obs No 4 1 Yes 9 6 2 4 Total 10 0 2 5 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns 20 . 21 . foreach x of varlist respgender_oth resprelig_joth respreslig_oth respdenom_oth { 2 . note l `x' 3 . count if `x'!=" " & respjewish==1 4 . } re s pge n der _oth : 1. What is your gender? 1 re s pre l ig_j oth : 1. What is your religion, if any? 8 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 22 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1054 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:24 2017 Page 8 re s pre s lig _oth : 1. What is your religion, if any? 1 re s pde n om_o th: 1. With which branch of Judaism do you currently identify, if any? 1 3 22 . 23 . ********* 24 . *Adult 2 25 . ********* 26 . 27 . foreach x of varlist hhadrlt2 hhadgender2 hhadage2_dec hhadhs2 hhadrelig2 hhadcons2 hhadpar2 hhadrel > d2 jedovcad2 jedbbyoad2 jedisrad2 { 2 . note l `x' 3 . svy, subpop(hhjewish): tab `x', per format (%20.0fc) stubw(30) obs 4 . } hh a drl t 2: 1. Adult2 What is your relationship to this adult? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 711 Number of PSUs = 711 Population size =4,1 00.6 744 Subpop. no. obs =711 Subpop. size =4,1 00.6 744 Design df = 702 Adult relationship 2 percentage obs Your spouse 9 1 66 4 Your adult child 1 1 3 Your stepchild 4 2 Your parent 0 4 Your sibling 0 3 Your fiance/e 1 4 Your significant other or part 1 2 0 Your other relative 0 1 Total 10 0 71 1 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns hh a dge n der 2 : 1 . A dul t 2 W h at i s t h is a dul t ’s g end e r? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 708 Number of PSUs = 708 Population size =4,0 42.2 149 Subpop. no. obs =708 Subpop. size =4,0 42.2 149 Design df = 699 Adult gender 2 percentage obs Male 4 4 34 1 Female 5 6 36 7 Total 10 0 70 8 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 23 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1055 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:24 2017 Page 9 hh a dag e 2_d e c: 1. Adult2 What is {his/her/their} age? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 694 Number of PSUs = 694 Population size =3,9 99.1 735 Subpop. no. obs =694 Subpop. size =3,9 99.1 735 Design df = 685 RECODE of hhadage2 (Adult age 2) percentage obs 18-19 yrs 0 1 20-29 yrs 0 5 30-39 yrs 2 9 40-49 yrs 5 3 9 50-59 yrs 1 1 5 7 60-69 yrs 2 8 18 6 70-79 yrs 4 1 30 6 80-89 yrs 1 2 8 7 90+ yrs 0 4 Total 10 0 69 4 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns hh a dhs 2 : 1. Adult2 {Is/Are} {he/she/they} currently enrolled in high school? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 4 Number of obs = 17 Number of PSUs = 17 Population size =91 .009 2 415 Subpop. no. obs =17 Subpop. size =91 .009 2 415 Design df = 13 Adult high school 2 percentage obs No 9 6 1 6 Yes 4 1 Total 10 0 1 7 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns hh a dre l ig2 : 1. Adult2 What is {his/her/their} religion? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 708 Number of PSUs = 708 Population size =4,0 95.4 483 Subpop. no. obs =708 Subpop. size =4,0 95.4 483 Design df = 699 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 24 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1056 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:24 2017 Page 10 Adult religion 2 percentage obs Jewish 7 4 59 1 Jewish + Else 1 7 Christian 1 2 6 7 Buddhist 0 2 Hindu 0 1 Muslim 0 1 Atheist 8 1 2 Agnostic 1 8 Other 3 1 9 Total 10 0 70 8 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns hh a dco n s2: 1. Adult2 Aside from religion, {does/do} {he/she/they} consider {himself/themselves} Jewish? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 8 Number of obs = 106 Number of PSUs = 106 Population size =97 9 .21 7 159 Subpop. no. obs =106 Subpop. size =97 9 .21 7 159 Design df = 98 Adult consider Jewish 2 percentage obs No 9 3 9 2 Yes 7 1 4 Total 10 0 10 6 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns hh a dpa r 2: 1. Adult2 Were either of {his/her/their} parents Jewish? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 706 Number of PSUs = 706 Population size =4,0 85.8 842 Subpop. no. obs =706 Subpop. size =4,0 85.8 842 Design df = 697 Adult parents Jewish 2 percentage obs No 3 4 16 2 Yes, mother 1 5 Yes, father 2 1 5 Yes, mother and father 6 4 52 4 Total 10 0 70 6 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns hh a dre l rsd 2 : 1. Adult2 In what religion {was/were} {he/she/they} raised? (running tabulate on estimation sample) 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 25 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1057 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:24 2017 Page 11 Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 706 Number of PSUs = 706 Population size =4,0 78.9 151 Subpop. no. obs =706 Subpop. size =4,0 78.9 151 Design df = 697 Adult religion raised 2 percentage obs Jewish 6 5 53 1 Jewish and something else 0 3 Another religion 3 1 14 1 No religion 4 3 1 Total 10 0 70 6 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns hh a dco n ver t 2: 1. Adult2 Did {he/she/they} have a formal conversion to Judaism? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 7 Number of obs = 56 Number of PSUs = 56 Population size =39 4 .97 5 634 Subpop. no. obs =56 Subpop. size =39 4 .97 5 634 Design df = 49 Adult converted 2 percentage obs No 8 5 Yes 9 2 5 1 Total 10 0 5 6 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns hh a dde n om2 : 1. Adult2 With which branch of Judaism {does/do} {he/she/they} identify, if any? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 612 Number of PSUs = 612 Population size =3,1 37.6 474 Subpop. no. obs =612 Subpop. size =3,1 37.6 474 Design df = 603 Adult denomination 2 percentage obs Orthodox 5 2 9 Conservative 2 6 18 0 Reconstructionist 1 4 Reform 5 0 31 4 Renewal 0 2 Secular/Cultural 1 1 4 5 Just Jewish 8 3 8 Total 10 0 61 2 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 26 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1058 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:24 2017 Page 12 je d pta d 2: 1. Adult2 In part-time school? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 1 Number of obs = 1 Number of PSUs = 1 Population size =3.3 672 1 325 Subpop. no. obs =1 Subpop. size =3.3 672 1 325 Design df = 0 [JewEd] Part-Time Adult 2 percentage obs No 10 0 1 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. je d dyc a d2: 1. Adult2 In day camp? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 1 Number of obs = 1 Number of PSUs = 1 Population size =3.3 672 1 325 Subpop. no. obs =1 Subpop. size =3.3 672 1 325 Design df = 0 [JewEd] Day Camp Adult 2 percentage obs No 10 0 1 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. je d ovc a d2: 1. Adult2 In overnight camp? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 1 Number of obs = 1 Number of PSUs = 1 Population size =3.3 672 1 325 Subpop. no. obs =1 Subpop. size =3.3 672 1 325 Design df = 0 [JewEd] Ovn Camp Adult 2 percentage obs No 10 0 1 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. je d bby o ad2 : 1. Adult2 In BBYO? (running tabulate on estimation sample) 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 27 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1059 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:25 2017 Page 13 Number of strata = 1 Number of obs = 1 Number of PSUs = 1 Population size =3.3 672 1 325 Subpop. no. obs =1 Subpop. size =3.3 672 1 325 Design df = 0 [JewEd] BBYO Adult 2 percentage obs No 10 0 1 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. je d isr a d2: 1. Adult2 Done Israel trip? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 1 Number of obs = 1 Number of PSUs = 1 Population size =3.3 672 1 325 Subpop. no. obs =1 Subpop. size =3.3 672 1 325 Design df = 0 [JewEd] Isr Trip Adult 2 percentage obs No 10 0 1 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. 28 . 29 . foreach x of varlist hhadrlt2_oth hhadrelig2_joth hhadrelig2_oth hhadrelrsd2_joth hhadrelrsd2_oth hhadde 2 . note l `x' 3 . count if `x'!=" " & hhjewish==1 4 . } hh a drl t 2_o t h: 1. Adult2 What is your relationship to this adult? 2 hh a dre l ig2 _jot h : 1. Adult2 What is {his/her/their} religion? 5 hh a dre l ig2 _oth : 1. Adult2 What is {his/her/their} religion? 1 7 hh a dre l rsd 2 _jo t h: 1. Adult2 In what religion {was/were} {he/she/they} raised? 3 hh a dre l rsd 2 _ot h : 1. Adult2 In what religion {was/were} {he/she/they} raised? 1 35 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 28 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1060 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:25 2017 Page 14 hh a dde n om2 _oth : 1. Adult2 With which branch of Judaism {does/do} {he/she/they} identify, if any? 2 30 . 31 . ********* 32 . *Adult 3 33 . ********* 34 . 35 . foreach x of varlist hhadrlt3 hhadgender3 hhadage3_dec hhadhs3 hhadrelig3 hhadcons3 hhadpar3 hhadrel > jedbbyoad3 jedisrad3 { 2 . note l `x' 3 . svy, subpop(hhjewish): tab `x', per format (%20.0fc) stubw(30) obs 4 . } hh a drl t 3: 1. Adult3 What is your relationship to this adult? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 6 Number of obs = 33 Number of PSUs = 33 Population size =1 0 7.3 3 855 Subpop. no. obs =33 Subpop. size =1 0 7.3 3 855 Design df = 27 Adult relationship 3 percentage obs Your adult child 7 2 2 5 Your parent 9 3 Your child-in-law 1 1 1 Your sibling 5 3 Your other relative 3 1 Total 10 0 3 3 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns hh a dge n der 3 : 1 . A dul t 3 W h at i s t h is a dul t ’s g end e r? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 6 Number of obs = 33 Number of PSUs = 33 Population size =1 0 7.3 3 855 Subpop. no. obs =33 Subpop. size =1 0 7.3 3 855 Design df = 27 Adult gender 3 percentage obs Male 5 2 1 8 Female 4 7 1 4 Something not listed here 1 1 Total 10 0 3 3 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns hh a dag e 3_d e c: 1. Adult3 What is {his/her/their} age? (running tabulate on estimation sample) 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 29 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1061 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:25 2017 Page 15 Number of strata = 6 Number of obs = 33 Number of PSUs = 33 Population size =1 0 7.3 3 855 Subpop. no. obs =33 Subpop. size =1 0 7.3 3 855 Design df = 27 RECODE of hhadage3 (Adult age 3) percentage obs 18-19 yrs 1 7 6 20-29 yrs 4 6 1 6 30-39 yrs 2 2 40-49 yrs 3 1 50-59 yrs 1 4 4 60-69 yrs 1 1 2 70-79 yrs 3 1 80-89 yrs 3 1 Total 10 0 3 3 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns hh a dhs 3 : 1. Adult3 {Is/Are} {he/she/they} currently enrolled in high school? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 2 Number of obs = 10 Number of PSUs = 10 Population size =28 .101 9 951 Subpop. no. obs =10 Subpop. size =28 .101 9 951 Design df = 8 Adult high school 3 percentage obs No 6 9 7 Yes 3 1 3 Total 10 0 1 0 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns hh a dre l ig3 : 1. Adult3 What is {his/her/their} religion? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 6 Number of obs = 32 Number of PSUs = 32 Population size =10 3 .97 1 337 Subpop. no. obs =32 Subpop. size =10 3 .97 1 337 Design df = 26 Adult religion 3 percentage obs Jewish 8 6 3 0 Jewish + Else 3 1 Christian 1 1 1 Total 10 0 3 2 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 30 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1062 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:25 2017 Page 16 hh a dco n s3: 1. Adult3 Aside from religion, {does/do} {he/she/they} consider {himself/themselves} Jewish? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 1 Number of obs = 1 Number of PSUs = 1 Population size =11 .618 2 041 Subpop. no. obs =1 Subpop. size =11 .618 2 041 Design df = 0 Adult consider Jewish 3 percentage obs No 10 0 1 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. hh a dpa r 3: 1. Adult3 Were either of {his/her/their} parents Jewish? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 6 Number of obs = 33 Number of PSUs = 33 Population size =1 0 7.3 3 855 Subpop. no. obs =33 Subpop. size =1 0 7.3 3 855 Design df = 27 Adult parents Jewish 3 percentage obs No 1 1 1 Yes, mother 2 1 6 Yes, father 7 3 Yes, mother and father 6 2 2 3 Total 10 0 3 3 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns hh a dre l rsd 3 : 1. Adult3 In what religion {was/were} {he/she/they} raised? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 6 Number of obs = 33 Number of PSUs = 33 Population size =1 0 7.3 3 855 Subpop. no. obs =33 Subpop. size =1 0 7.3 3 855 Design df = 27 Adult religion raised 3 percentage obs Jewish 8 2 2 9 Jewish and something else 4 2 Another religion 1 1 1 No religion 3 1 Total 10 0 3 3 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 31 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1063 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:25 2017 Page 17 hh a dde n om3 : 1. Adult3 With which branch of Judaism {does/do} {he/she/they} identify, if any? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 6 Number of obs = 31 Number of PSUs = 31 Population size =9 2 .35 3 133 Subpop. no. obs =31 Subpop. size =9 2 .35 3 133 Design df = 25 Adult denomination 3 percentage obs Orthodox 7 2 Conservative 1 7 4 Reform 5 1 1 5 Secular/Cultural 1 2 4 Just Jewish 1 3 6 Total 10 0 3 1 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns je d pta d 3: 1. Adult3 In part-time school? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 2 Number of obs = 3 Number of PSUs = 3 Population size =8.6 538 9 252 Subpop. no. obs =3 Subpop. size =8.6 538 9 252 Design df = 1 [JewEd] Part-Time Adult 3 percentage obs No 10 0 3 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. je d dyc a d3: 1. Adult3 In day camp? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 2 Number of obs = 3 Number of PSUs = 3 Population size =8.6 538 9 252 Subpop. no. obs =3 Subpop. size =8.6 538 9 252 Design df = 1 [JewEd] Day Camp Adult 3 percentage obs No 10 0 3 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 32 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1064 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:25 2017 Page 18 je d ovc a d3: 1. Adult3 In overnight camp? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 2 Number of obs = 3 Number of PSUs = 3 Population size =8.6 538 9 252 Subpop. no. obs =3 Subpop. size =8.6 538 9 252 Design df = 1 [JewEd] Ovn Camp Adult 3 percentage obs No 10 0 3 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. je d bby o ad3 : 1. Adult3 In BBYO? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 2 Number of obs = 3 Number of PSUs = 3 Population size =8.6 538 9 252 Subpop. no. obs =3 Subpop. size =8.6 538 9 252 Design df = 1 [JewEd] BBYO Adult 3 percentage obs No 5 2 2 Yes 4 8 1 Total 10 0 3 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns je d isr a d3: 1. Adult3 Done Israel trip? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 2 Number of obs = 3 Number of PSUs = 3 Population size =8.6 538 9 252 Subpop. no. obs =3 Subpop. size =8.6 538 9 252 Design df = 1 [JewEd] Isr Trip Adult 3 percentage obs No 10 0 3 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 33 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1065 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:25 2017 Page 19 36 . 37 . foreach x of varlist hhadrelig3_joth hhadrelrsd3_joth hhadrelrsd3_oth { 2 . note l `x' 3 . count if `x'!=" " & hhjewish==1 4 . } hh a dre l ig3 _jot h : 1. Adult3 What is {his/her/their} religion? 1 hh a dre l rsd 3 _jo t h: 1. Adult3 In what religion {was/were} {he/she/they} raised? 2 hh a dre l rsd 3 _ot h : 1. Adult3 In what religion {was/were} {he/she/they} raised? 1 38 . 39 . ********* 40 . *Adult 4 41 . ********* 42 . 43 . foreach x of varlist hhadrlt4 hhadgender4 hhadage4_dec hhadhs4 hhadrelig4 hhadcons4 hhadpar4 hhadrel > jedbbyoad4 jedisrad4 { 2 . note l `x' 3 . svy, subpop(hhjewish): tab `x', per format (%20.0fc) stubw(30) obs 4 . } hh a drl t 4: 1. Adult4 What is your relationship to this adult? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 5 Number of obs = 9 Number of PSUs = 9 Population size =3 2 .94 7 211 Subpop. no. obs =9 Subpop. size =3 2 .94 7 211 Design df = 4 Adult relationship 4 percentage obs Your adult child 8 0 7 Your parent 1 0 1 Your other relative 1 0 1 Total 10 0 9 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns hh a dge n der 4 : 1 . A dul t 4 W h at i s t h is a dul t ’s g end e r? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 5 Number of obs = 9 Number of PSUs = 9 Population size =3 2 .94 7 211 Subpop. no. obs =9 Subpop. size =3 2 .94 7 211 Design df = 4 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 34 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1066 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:25 2017 Page 20 Adult gender 4 percentage obs Male 5 6 4 Female 4 4 5 Total 10 0 9 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns hh a dag e 4_d e c: 1. Adult4 What is {his/her/their} age? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 5 Number of obs = 9 Number of PSUs = 9 Population size =3 2 .94 7 211 Subpop. no. obs =9 Subpop. size =3 2 .94 7 211 Design df = 4 RECODE of hhadage4 (Adult age 4) percentage obs 18-19 yrs 4 6 5 20-29 yrs 1 8 2 50-59 yrs 2 6 1 60-69 yrs 1 0 1 Total 10 0 9 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns hh a dhs 4 : 1. Adult4 {Is/Are} {he/she/they} currently enrolled in high school? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 4 Number of obs = 6 Number of PSUs = 6 Population size =18 .336 6 001 Subpop. no. obs =6 Subpop. size =18 .336 6 001 Design df = 2 Adult high school 4 percentage obs No 6 3 4 Yes 3 7 2 Total 10 0 6 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns hh a dre l ig4 : 1. Adult4 What is {his/her/their} religion? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 5 Number of obs = 9 Number of PSUs = 9 Population size =3 2 .94 7 211 Subpop. no. obs =9 Subpop. size =3 2 .94 7 211 Design df = 4 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 35 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1067 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:25 2017 Page 21 Adult religion 4 percentage obs Jewish 9 0 8 Agnostic 1 0 1 Total 10 0 9 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns hh a dco n s4: 1. Adult4 Aside from religion, {does/do} {he/she/they} consider {himself/themselves} Jewish? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 1 Number of obs = 1 Number of PSUs = 1 Population size =3.3 672 1 325 Subpop. no. obs =1 Subpop. size =3.3 672 1 325 Design df = 0 Adult consider Jewish 4 percentage obs Yes 10 0 1 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. hh a dpa r 4: 1. Adult4 Were either of {his/her/their} parents Jewish? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 5 Number of obs = 9 Number of PSUs = 9 Population size =3 2 .94 7 211 Subpop. no. obs =9 Subpop. size =3 2 .94 7 211 Design df = 4 Adult parents Jewish 4 percentage obs Yes, mother 3 1 Yes, father 1 0 1 Yes, mother and father 8 6 7 Total 10 0 9 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns hh a dre l rsd 4 : 1. Adult4 In what religion {was/were} {he/she/they} raised? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 5 Number of obs = 9 Number of PSUs = 9 Population size =3 2 .94 7 211 Subpop. no. obs =9 Subpop. size =3 2 .94 7 211 Design df = 4 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 36 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1068 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:25 2017 Page 22 Adult religion raised 4 percentage obs Jewish 9 0 8 No religion 1 0 1 Total 10 0 9 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns hh a dde n om4 : 1. Adult4 With which branch of Judaism {does/do} {he/she/they} identify, if any? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 5 Number of obs = 9 Number of PSUs = 9 Population size =3 2 .94 7 211 Subpop. no. obs =9 Subpop. size =3 2 .94 7 211 Design df = 4 Adult denomination 4 percentage obs Orthodox 1 0 1 Conservative 4 4 3 Reform 4 3 4 Just Jewish 3 1 Total 10 0 9 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns je d pta d 4: 1. Adult4 In part-time school? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 1 Number of obs = 2 Number of PSUs = 2 Population size =6 .734 4 265 Subpop. no. obs =2 Subpop. size =6 .734 4 265 Design df = 1 [JewEd] Part-Time Adult 4 percentage obs No 10 0 2 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. je d dyc a d4: 1. Adult4 In day camp? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 1 Number of obs = 2 Number of PSUs = 2 Population size =6 .734 4 265 Subpop. no. obs =2 Subpop. size =6 .734 4 265 Design df = 1 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 37 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1069 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:25 2017 Page 23 [JewEd] Day Camp Adult 4 percentage obs No 10 0 2 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. je d ovc a d4: 1. Adult4 In overnight camp? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 1 Number of obs = 2 Number of PSUs = 2 Population size =6 .734 4 265 Subpop. no. obs =2 Subpop. size =6 .734 4 265 Design df = 1 [JewEd] Ovn Camp Adult 4 percentage obs No 10 0 2 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. je d bby o ad4 : 1. Adult4 In BBYO? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 1 Number of obs = 2 Number of PSUs = 2 Population size =6 .734 4 265 Subpop. no. obs =2 Subpop. size =6 .734 4 265 Design df = 1 [JewEd] BBYO Adult 4 percentage obs No 10 0 2 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. je d isr a d4: 1. Adult4 Done Israel trip? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 1 Number of obs = 1 Number of PSUs = 1 Population size =3.3 672 1 325 Subpop. no. obs =1 Subpop. size =3.3 672 1 325 Design df = 0 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 38 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1070 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:25 2017 Page 24 [JewEd] Isr Trip Adult 4 percentage obs No 10 0 1 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. 44 . 45 . 46 . ********* 47 . *Adult 5 48 . ********* 49 . 50 . foreach x of varlist hhadrlt5 hhadgender5 hhadage5_dec hhadhs5 hhadrelig5 hhadpar5 hhadrelrsd5 hhaddenom 2 . note l `x' 3 . svy, subpop(hhjewish): tab `x', per format (%20.0fc) stubw(30) obs 4 . } hh a drl t 5: 1. Adult5 What is your relationship to this adult? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 1 Number of obs = 1 Number of PSUs = 1 Population size =2.7 274 4 274 Subpop. no. obs =1 Subpop. size =2.7 274 4 274 Design df = 0 Adult relationship 5 percentage obs Your adult child 10 0 1 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. hh a dge n der 5 : 1 . A dul t 5 W h at i s t h is a dul t ’s g end e r? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 1 Number of obs = 1 Number of PSUs = 1 Population size =2.7 274 4 274 Subpop. no. obs =1 Subpop. size =2.7 274 4 274 Design df = 0 Adult gender 5 percentage obs Female 10 0 1 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 39 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1071 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:25 2017 Page 25 hh a dag e 5_d e c: 1. Adult5 What is {his/her/their} age? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 1 Number of obs = 1 Number of PSUs = 1 Population size =2.7 274 4 274 Subpop. no. obs =1 Subpop. size =2.7 274 4 274 Design df = 0 RECODE of hhadage5 (Adult age 5) percentage obs 18-19 yrs 10 0 1 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. hh a dhs 5 : 1. Adult5 {Is/Are} {he/she/they} currently enrolled in high school? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 1 Number of obs = 1 Number of PSUs = 1 Population size =2.7 274 4 274 Subpop. no. obs =1 Subpop. size =2.7 274 4 274 Design df = 0 Adult high school 5 percentage obs No 10 0 1 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. hh a dre l ig5 : 1. Adult5 What is {his/her/their} religion? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 1 Number of obs = 1 Number of PSUs = 1 Population size =2.7 274 4 274 Subpop. no. obs =1 Subpop. size =2.7 274 4 274 Design df = 0 Adult religion 5 percentage obs Jewish 10 0 1 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 40 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1072 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:25 2017 Page 26 hh a dpa r 5: 1. Adult5 Were either of {his/her/their} parents Jewish? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 1 Number of obs = 1 Number of PSUs = 1 Population size =2.7 274 4 274 Subpop. no. obs =1 Subpop. size =2.7 274 4 274 Design df = 0 Adult parents Jewish 5 percentage obs Yes, mother and father 10 0 1 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. hh a dre l rsd 5 : 1. Adult5 In what religion {was/were} {he/she/they} raised? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 1 Number of obs = 1 Number of PSUs = 1 Population size =2.7 274 4 274 Subpop. no. obs =1 Subpop. size =2.7 274 4 274 Design df = 0 Adult religion raised 5 percentage obs Jewish 10 0 1 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. hh a dde n om5 : 1. Adult5 With which branch of Judaism {does/do} {he/she/they} identify, if any? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 1 Number of obs = 1 Number of PSUs = 1 Population size =2.7 274 4 274 Subpop. no. obs =1 Subpop. size =2.7 274 4 274 Design df = 0 Adult denomination 5 percentage obs Conservative 10 0 1 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 41 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1073 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:25 2017 Page 27 51 . 52 . 53 . ********* 54 . *Child 1 55 . ********* 56 . 57 . foreach x of varlist hhchage_1 hhchgrd1 hhchgender1 hhchrlt1 hhchrelrsd1 hhchrelsame hhchbarbat1 jedjpk1 > d68dyc1 jed68ovc1 jed68msp1 jed912pt1 jed912dyc1 jed912ovc1 jed912bbyo1 jedothpt1 jedothdyc1 jedothovc1 2 . note l `x' 3 . svy, subpop(hhjewish): tab `x', per format (%20.0fc) stubw(30) obs 4 . } hh c hag e _1: 1. Child1 What is {his/her/their} age? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 6 Number of obs = 66 Number of PSUs = 66 Population size =34 6 .69 7 324 Subpop. no. obs =66 Subpop. size =34 6 .69 7 324 Design df = 60 RECODE of hhchage1 (Child age 1) percentage obs 0-5 2 1 9 7-12 4 1 2 4 13-17 3 8 3 3 Total 10 0 6 6 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns hh c hgr d 1: 1. Child1 What grade was {he/she/this child} in during the 2016-17 school year? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 6 Number of obs = 65 Number of PSUs = 65 Population size =34 4 .44 9 944 Subpop. no. obs =65 Subpop. size =34 4 .44 9 944 Design df = 59 Child grade 1 percentage obs Not yet in kindergarten 2 1 9 K-5 3 3 2 0 6-8 1 6 1 1 9-12 2 9 2 4 Other 1 1 Total 10 0 6 5 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns hh c hge n der 1 : 1 . C hil d 1 I s th i s c h ild … (running tabulate on estimation sample) 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 42 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1074 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:25 2017 Page 28 Number of strata = 6 Number of obs = 63 Number of PSUs = 63 Population size =33 3 .30 4 467 Subpop. no. obs =63 Subpop. size =33 3 .30 4 467 Design df = 57 Child gender 1 percentage obs Male 5 1 3 3 Female 4 9 3 0 Total 10 0 6 3 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns hh c hrl t 1: 1. Child1 What is your relationship to {him/her/this child}? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 6 Number of obs = 60 Number of PSUs = 60 Population size =32 0 .49 9 857 Subpop. no. obs =60 Subpop. size =32 0 .49 9 857 Design df = 54 Child relationship 1 percentage obs Your child 9 8 5 8 Your grandchild 2 2 Total 10 0 6 0 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns hh c hre l rsd 1 : 1 . C hil d 1 I s th i s c h ild bei n g r a ise d … (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 6 Number of obs = 66 Number of PSUs = 66 Population size =33 6 .95 7 528 Subpop. no. obs =66 Subpop. size =33 6 .95 7 528 Design df = 60 Child religion 1 percentage obs Jewish by religion 6 7 5 2 Culturally Jewish 1 1 8 Jewish + Another 1 0 4 Another religion 9 1 No religion 3 1 Total 10 0 6 6 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns hh c hre l sam e : 1. In terms of religion, are all of the children in the household being raised in the same way? (running tabulate on estimation sample) 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 43 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1075 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:25 2017 Page 29 Number of strata = 6 Number of obs = 49 Number of PSUs = 49 Population size =27 2 .50 1 549 Subpop. no. obs =49 Subpop. size =27 2 .50 1 549 Design df = 43 All children raised same religion percentage obs Yes 10 0 4 9 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. hh c hba r bat 1 : 1. Child1 Did this child have a Bar or Bat Mitzvah? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 6 Number of obs = 27 Number of PSUs = 27 Population size =97 .369 3 165 Subpop. no. obs =27 Subpop. size =97 .369 3 165 Design df = 21 Child bar/bat mitzvah 1 percentage obs No 1 1 2 Yes 8 9 2 5 Total 10 0 2 7 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns je d jpk 1 : 1. Child1 In Jewish pre-k? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 3 Number of obs = 9 Number of PSUs = 9 Population size =73 .912 4 619 Subpop. no. obs =9 Subpop. size =73 .912 4 619 Design df = 6 [JewEd] J Pre-K Child 1 percentage obs No 2 2 2 Yes 7 8 7 Total 10 0 9 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns je d pk1 : 1. Child1 In non-Jewish pre-k? (running tabulate on estimation sample) 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 44 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1076 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:25 2017 Page 30 Number of strata = 3 Number of obs = 9 Number of PSUs = 9 Population size =73 .912 4 619 Subpop. no. obs =9 Subpop. size =73 .912 4 619 Design df = 6 [JewEd] NJ Pre-K Child 1 percentage obs No 7 8 7 Yes 2 2 2 Total 10 0 9 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns je d k5p t 1: 1. Child1 In part-time school, K-5? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 4 Number of obs = 20 Number of PSUs = 20 Population size =11 3 .43 7 791 Subpop. no. obs =20 Subpop. size =11 3 .43 7 791 Design df = 16 [JewEd] K5 Part-Time Child 1 percentage obs No 6 1 4 Yes 3 9 1 6 Total 10 0 2 0 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns je d k5d y c1: 1. Child1 In day camp, K-5? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 4 Number of obs = 20 Number of PSUs = 20 Population size =11 3 .43 7 791 Subpop. no. obs =20 Subpop. size =11 3 .43 7 791 Design df = 16 [JewEd] K5 Day Camp Child 1 percentage obs No 10 0 2 0 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. je d k5o v c1: 1. Child1 In overnight camp, K-5? (running tabulate on estimation sample) 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 45 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1077 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:25 2017 Page 31 Number of strata = 4 Number of obs = 20 Number of PSUs = 20 Population size =11 3 .43 7 791 Subpop. no. obs =20 Subpop. size =11 3 .43 7 791 Design df = 16 [JewEd] K5 Ovn Camp Child 1 percentage obs No 8 7 1 7 Yes 1 3 3 Total 10 0 2 0 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns je d 68p t 1: 1. Child1 In part-time school, 6-8? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 3 Number of obs = 11 Number of PSUs = 11 Population size =54 .406 1 188 Subpop. no. obs =11 Subpop. size =54 .406 1 188 Design df = 8 [JewEd] 68 Part-Time Child 1 percentage obs No 5 4 5 Yes 4 6 6 Total 10 0 1 1 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns je d 68d y c1: 1. Child1 In day camp, 6-8? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 3 Number of obs = 11 Number of PSUs = 11 Population size =54 .406 1 188 Subpop. no. obs =11 Subpop. size =54 .406 1 188 Design df = 8 [JewEd] 68 Day Camp Child 1 percentage obs No 9 5 1 0 Yes 5 1 Total 10 0 1 1 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns je d 68o v c1: 1. Child1 In overnight camp, 6-8? (running tabulate on estimation sample) 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 46 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1078 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:25 2017 Page 32 Number of strata = 3 Number of obs = 11 Number of PSUs = 11 Population size =54 .406 1 188 Subpop. no. obs =11 Subpop. size =54 .406 1 188 Design df = 8 [JewEd] 68 Ovn Camp Child 1 percentage obs No 8 5 8 Yes 1 5 3 Total 10 0 1 1 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns je d 68m s p1: 1. Child1 In MSP, 6-8? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 3 Number of obs = 11 Number of PSUs = 11 Population size =54 .406 1 188 Subpop. no. obs =11 Subpop. size =54 .406 1 188 Design df = 8 [JewEd] 68 MSP Child 1 percentage obs No 8 8 9 Yes 1 2 2 Total 10 0 1 1 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns je d 912 p t1: 1. Child1 In part-time school, 9-12? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 5 Number of obs = 24 Number of PSUs = 24 Population size =99 .326 3 588 Subpop. no. obs =24 Subpop. size =99 .326 3 588 Design df = 19 [JewEd] 912 Part-Time Child 1 percentage obs No 6 0 1 1 Yes 4 0 1 3 Total 10 0 2 4 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns je d 912 d yc1 : 1. Child1 In day camp, 9-12? (running tabulate on estimation sample) 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 47 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1079 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:25 2017 Page 33 Number of strata = 5 Number of obs = 24 Number of PSUs = 24 Population size =99 .326 3 588 Subpop. no. obs =24 Subpop. size =99 .326 3 588 Design df = 19 [JewEd] 912 Day Camp Child 1 percentage obs No 7 8 1 9 Yes 2 2 5 Total 10 0 2 4 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns je d 912 o vc1 : 1. Child1 In overnight camp, 9-12? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 5 Number of obs = 24 Number of PSUs = 24 Population size =99 .326 3 588 Subpop. no. obs =24 Subpop. size =99 .326 3 588 Design df = 19 [JewEd] 912 Ovn Camp Child 1 percentage obs No 7 3 1 6 Yes 2 7 8 Total 10 0 2 4 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns je d 912 b byo 1 : 1. Child1 In BBYO, 9-12? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 5 Number of obs = 24 Number of PSUs = 24 Population size =99 .326 3 588 Subpop. no. obs =24 Subpop. size =99 .326 3 588 Design df = 19 [JewEd] 912 BBYO Child 1 percentage obs No 5 6 1 2 Yes 4 4 1 2 Total 10 0 2 4 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns je d oth p t1: 1. Child1 In part-time school, other? (running tabulate on estimation sample) 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 48 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1080 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:25 2017 Page 34 Number of strata = 1 Number of obs = 1 Number of PSUs = 1 Population size =3.3 672 1 325 Subpop. no. obs =1 Subpop. size =3.3 672 1 325 Design df = 0 [JewEd] oth Part-Time Child 1 percentage obs Yes 10 0 1 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. je d oth d yc1 : 1. Child1 In day camp, other? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 1 Number of obs = 1 Number of PSUs = 1 Population size =3.3 672 1 325 Subpop. no. obs =1 Subpop. size =3.3 672 1 325 Design df = 0 [JewEd] oth Day Camp Child 1 percentage obs No 10 0 1 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. je d oth o vc1 : 1. Child1 In overnight camp, other? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 1 Number of obs = 1 Number of PSUs = 1 Population size =3.3 672 1 325 Subpop. no. obs =1 Subpop. size =3.3 672 1 325 Design df = 0 [JewEd] oth Ovn Camp Child 1 percentage obs No 10 0 1 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. je d oth m sp1 : 1. Child1 In MSP, other? (running tabulate on estimation sample) 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 49 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1081 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:25 2017 Page 35 Number of strata = 1 Number of obs = 1 Number of PSUs = 1 Population size =3.3 672 1 325 Subpop. no. obs =1 Subpop. size =3.3 672 1 325 Design df = 0 [JewEd] oth MSP Child 1 percentage obs No 10 0 1 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. je d oth b byo 1 : 1. Child1 In BBYO, 9-12? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 1 Number of obs = 1 Number of PSUs = 1 Population size =3.3 672 1 325 Subpop. no. obs =1 Subpop. size =3.3 672 1 325 Design df = 0 [JewEd] oth BBYO Child 1 percentage obs Yes 10 0 1 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. je d isr 1 : 1. Child1 Done Israel trip, 9-12? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 5 Number of obs = 22 Number of PSUs = 22 Population size =85 .182 8 604 Subpop. no. obs =22 Subpop. size =85 .182 8 604 Design df = 17 [JewEd] Isr Trip Child 1 percentage obs No 8 3 2 0 Yes 1 7 2 Total 10 0 2 2 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 50 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1082 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:25 2017 Page 36 58 . 59 . foreach x of varlist hhchrelrsd1_oth hhchrelrsd1_joth { 2 . note l `x' 3 . count if `x'!=" " & hhjewish==1 4 . } hh c hre l rsd 1 _ot h : 1 . C hil d 1 I s th i s c h ild bei n g r a ise d … 1 hh c hre l rsd 1 _jo t h: 1 . C hil d 1 I s th i s c h ild bei n g r a ise d … 4 60 . 61 . ********* 62 . *Child 2 63 . ********* 64 . 65 . foreach x of varlist hhchage_2 hhchgrd2 hhchgender2 hhchrlt2 hhchbarbat2 jedjpk2 jedpk2 jedk5pt2 jedk5dy > sp2 jed912pt2 jed912dyc2 jed912ovc2 jed912bbyo2 jedisr2 { 2 . note l `x' 3 . svy, subpop(hhjewish): tab `x', per format (%20.0fc) stubw(30) obs 4 . } hh c hag e _2: 1. Child2 What is {his/her/their} age? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 6 Number of obs = 47 Number of PSUs = 47 Population size =27 0 .45 6 098 Subpop. no. obs =47 Subpop. size =27 0 .45 6 098 Design df = 41 RECODE of hhchage2 (Child age 2) percentage obs 0-5 2 1 4 7-12 2 4 1 8 13-17 5 4 2 5 Total 10 0 4 7 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns hh c hgr d 2: 1. Child2 What grade was {he/she/this child} in during the 2016-17 school year? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 5 Number of obs = 46 Number of PSUs = 46 Population size =26 8 .20 8 718 Subpop. no. obs =46 Subpop. size =26 8 .20 8 718 Design df = 41 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 51 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1083 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:25 2017 Page 37 Child grade 2 percentage obs Not yet in kindergarten 2 0 3 K-5 2 4 1 7 6-8 3 4 1 4 9-12 2 2 1 2 Total 10 0 4 6 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns hh c hge n der 2 : 1 . C hil d 2 I s th i s c h ild … (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 5 Number of obs = 44 Number of PSUs = 44 Population size =26 4 .44 4 786 Subpop. no. obs =44 Subpop. size =26 4 .44 4 786 Design df = 39 Child gender 2 percentage obs Male 6 4 2 4 Female 3 6 2 0 Total 10 0 4 4 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns hh c hrl t 2: 1. Child2 What is your relationship to {him/her/this child}? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 5 Number of obs = 41 Number of PSUs = 41 Population size =24 1 .05 8 461 Subpop. no. obs =41 Subpop. size =24 1 .05 8 461 Design df = 36 Child relationship 2 percentage obs Your child 10 0 4 1 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. hh c hba r bat 2 : 1. Child2 Did this child have a Bar or Bat Mitzvah? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 4 Number of obs = 19 Number of PSUs = 19 Population size =10 6 .68 7 809 Subpop. no. obs =19 Subpop. size =10 6 .68 7 809 Design df = 15 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 52 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1084 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:25 2017 Page 38 Child bar/bat mitzvah 2 percentage obs No 5 7 4 Yes 3 8 1 3 Will have one in the future 5 2 Total 10 0 1 9 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns je d jpk 2 : 1. Child2 In Jewish pre-k? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 2 Number of obs = 3 Number of PSUs = 3 Population size =54 .822 0 044 Subpop. no. obs =3 Subpop. size =54 .822 0 044 Design df = 1 [JewEd] J Pre-K Child 2 percentage obs No 2 1 Yes 9 8 2 Total 10 0 3 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns je d pk2 : 1. Child2 In non-Jewish pre-k? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 2 Number of obs = 3 Number of PSUs = 3 Population size =54 .822 0 044 Subpop. no. obs =3 Subpop. size =54 .822 0 044 Design df = 1 [JewEd] NJ Pre-K Child 2 percentage obs No 10 0 3 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. je d k5p t 2: 1. Child2 In part-time school, K-5? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 3 Number of obs = 17 Number of PSUs = 17 Population size =63 .404 0 825 Subpop. no. obs =17 Subpop. size =63 .404 0 825 Design df = 14 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 53 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1085 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:25 2017 Page 39 [JewEd] K5 Part-Time Child 2 percentage obs No 1 8 1 Yes 8 2 1 6 Total 10 0 1 7 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns je d k5d y c2: 1. Child2 In day camp, K-5? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 3 Number of obs = 17 Number of PSUs = 17 Population size =63 .404 0 825 Subpop. no. obs =17 Subpop. size =63 .404 0 825 Design df = 14 [JewEd] K5 Day Camp Child 2 percentage obs No 10 0 1 7 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. je d k5o v c2: 1. Child2 In overnight camp, K-5? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 3 Number of obs = 17 Number of PSUs = 17 Population size =63 .404 0 825 Subpop. no. obs =17 Subpop. size =63 .404 0 825 Design df = 14 [JewEd] K5 Ovn Camp Child 2 percentage obs No 7 5 1 4 Yes 2 5 3 Total 10 0 1 7 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns je d 68p t 2: 1. Child2 In part-time school, 6-8? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 3 Number of obs = 14 Number of PSUs = 14 Population size =90 .530 9 982 Subpop. no. obs =14 Subpop. size =90 .530 9 982 Design df = 11 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 54 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1086 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:25 2017 Page 40 [JewEd] 68 Part-Time Child 2 percentage obs No 6 3 6 Yes 3 7 8 Total 10 0 1 4 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns je d 68d y c2: 1. Child2 In day camp, 6-8? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 3 Number of obs = 14 Number of PSUs = 14 Population size =90 .530 9 982 Subpop. no. obs =14 Subpop. size =90 .530 9 982 Design df = 11 [JewEd] 68 Day Camp Child 2 percentage obs No 8 4 1 2 Yes 1 6 2 Total 10 0 1 4 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns je d 68o v c2: 1. Child2 In overnight camp, 6-8? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 3 Number of obs = 14 Number of PSUs = 14 Population size =90 .530 9 982 Subpop. no. obs =14 Subpop. size =90 .530 9 982 Design df = 11 [JewEd] 68 Ovn Camp Child 2 percentage obs No 7 3 1 1 Yes 2 7 3 Total 10 0 1 4 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns je d 68m s p2: 1. Child2 In MSP, 6-8? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 3 Number of obs = 14 Number of PSUs = 14 Population size =90 .530 9 982 Subpop. no. obs =14 Subpop. size =90 .530 9 982 Design df = 11 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 55 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1087 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:25 2017 Page 41 [JewEd] 68 MSP Child 2 percentage obs No 6 6 1 0 Yes 3 4 4 Total 10 0 1 4 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns je d 912 p t2: 1. Child2 In part-time school, 9-12? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 4 Number of obs = 12 Number of PSUs = 12 Population size =59 .451 6 327 Subpop. no. obs =12 Subpop. size =59 .451 6 327 Design df = 8 [JewEd] 912 Part-Time Child 2 percentage obs No 7 5 5 Yes 2 5 7 Total 10 0 1 2 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns je d 912 d yc2 : 1. Child2 In day camp, 9-12? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 4 Number of obs = 12 Number of PSUs = 12 Population size =59 .451 6 327 Subpop. no. obs =12 Subpop. size =59 .451 6 327 Design df = 8 [JewEd] 912 Day Camp Child 2 percentage obs No 9 4 1 0 Yes 6 2 Total 10 0 1 2 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns je d 912 o vc2 : 1. Child2 In overnight camp, 9-12? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 4 Number of obs = 12 Number of PSUs = 12 Population size =59 .451 6 327 Subpop. no. obs =12 Subpop. size =59 .451 6 327 Design df = 8 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 56 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1088 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:25 2017 Page 42 [JewEd] 912 Ovn Camp Child 2 percentage obs No 8 6 8 Yes 1 4 4 Total 10 0 1 2 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns je d 912 b byo 2 : 1. Child2 In BBYO, 9-12? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 4 Number of obs = 12 Number of PSUs = 12 Population size =59 .451 6 327 Subpop. no. obs =12 Subpop. size =59 .451 6 327 Design df = 8 [JewEd] 912 BBYO Child 2 percentage obs No 8 9 8 Yes 1 1 4 Total 10 0 1 2 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns je d isr 2 : 1. Child2 Done Israel trip, 9-12? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 4 Number of obs = 10 Number of PSUs = 10 Population size =39 .120 1 746 Subpop. no. obs =10 Subpop. size =39 .120 1 746 Design df = 6 [JewEd] Isr Trip Child 2 percentage obs No 10 0 1 0 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. 66 . 67 . foreach x of varlist hhchrelrsd2_oth hhchrelrsd2_joth { 2 . note l `x' 3 . count if `x'!=" " & hhjewish==1 4 . } hh c hre l rsd 2 _ot h : 1 . C hil d 2 I s th i s c h ild bei n g r a ise d … 1 hh c hre l rsd 2 _jo t h: 1 . C hil d 2 I s th i s c h ild bei n g r a ise d … 3 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 57 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1089 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:25 2017 Page 43 68 . 69 . ********* 70 . *Child 3 71 . ********* 72 . 73 . foreach x of varlist hhchage_3 hhchgrd3 hhchgender3 hhchrlt3 hhchbarbat3 jedjpk3 jedpk3 jedk5pt3 jedk5dy > sp3 jed912pt3 jed912dyc3 jed912ovc3 jed912bbyo3 jedisr3 { 2 . note l `x' 3 . svy, subpop(hhjewish): tab `x', per format (%20.0fc) stubw(30) obs 4 . } hh c hag e _3: 1. Child3 What is {his/her/their} age? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 3 Number of obs = 18 Number of PSUs = 18 Population size =86 .353 2 488 Subpop. no. obs =18 Subpop. size =86 .353 2 488 Design df = 15 RECODE of hhchage3 (Child age 3) percentage obs 0-5 1 1 2 7-12 5 8 1 2 13-17 3 1 4 Total 10 0 1 8 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns hh c hgr d 3: 1. Child3 What grade was {he/she/this child} in during the 2016-17 school year? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 3 Number of obs = 18 Number of PSUs = 18 Population size =86 .353 2 488 Subpop. no. obs =18 Subpop. size =86 .353 2 488 Design df = 15 Child grade 3 percentage obs Not yet in kindergarten 8 1 K-5 6 1 1 3 6-8 7 1 9-12 2 3 3 Total 10 0 1 8 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns hh c hge n der 3 : 1 . C hil d 3 I s th i s c h ild … (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 3 Number of obs = 17 Number of PSUs = 17 Population size =74 .735 0 447 Subpop. no. obs =17 Subpop. size =74 .735 0 447 Design df = 14 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 58 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1090 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:25 2017 Page 44 Child gender 3 percentage obs Male 9 3 1 4 Female 7 3 Total 10 0 1 7 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns hh c hrl t 3: 1. Child3 What is your relationship to {him/her/this child}? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 3 Number of obs = 17 Number of PSUs = 17 Population size =74 .735 0 447 Subpop. no. obs =17 Subpop. size =74 .735 0 447 Design df = 14 Child relationship 3 percentage obs Your child 10 0 1 7 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. hh c hba r bat 3 : 1. Child3 Did this child have a Bar or Bat Mitzvah? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 2 Number of obs = 3 Number of PSUs = 3 Population size =20 .291 6 172 Subpop. no. obs =3 Subpop. size =20 .291 6 172 Design df = 1 Child bar/bat mitzvah 3 percentage obs No 5 7 1 Yes 4 3 2 Total 10 0 3 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns je d jpk 3 : 1. Child3 In Jewish pre-k? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 1 Number of obs = 1 Number of PSUs = 1 Population size =6.8 186 0 685 Subpop. no. obs =1 Subpop. size =6.8 186 0 685 Design df = 0 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 59 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1091 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:25 2017 Page 45 [JewEd] J Pre-K Child 3 percentage obs Yes 10 0 1 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. je d pk3 : 1. Child3 In non-Jewish pre-k? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 1 Number of obs = 1 Number of PSUs = 1 Population size =6.8 186 0 685 Subpop. no. obs =1 Subpop. size =6.8 186 0 685 Design df = 0 [JewEd] NJ Pre-K Child 3 percentage obs No 10 0 1 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. je d k5p t 3: 1. Child3 In part-time school, K-5? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 2 Number of obs = 13 Number of PSUs = 13 Population size =52 .929 7 895 Subpop. no. obs =13 Subpop. size =52 .929 7 895 Design df = 11 [JewEd] K5 Part-Time Child 3 percentage obs No 5 5 6 Yes 4 5 7 Total 10 0 1 3 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns je d k5d y c3: 1. Child3 In day camp, K-5? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 2 Number of obs = 13 Number of PSUs = 13 Population size =52 .929 7 895 Subpop. no. obs =13 Subpop. size =52 .929 7 895 Design df = 11 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 60 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1092 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:25 2017 Page 46 [JewEd] K5 Day Camp Child 3 percentage obs No 6 7 1 0 Yes 3 3 3 Total 10 0 1 3 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns je d k5o v c3: 1. Child3 In overnight camp, K-5? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 2 Number of obs = 13 Number of PSUs = 13 Population size =52 .929 7 895 Subpop. no. obs =13 Subpop. size =52 .929 7 895 Design df = 11 [JewEd] K5 Ovn Camp Child 3 percentage obs No 7 4 1 2 Yes 2 6 1 Total 10 0 1 3 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns je d 68p t 3: 1. Child3 In part-time school, 6-8? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 1 Number of obs = 1 Number of PSUs = 1 Population size =6.3 132 3 528 Subpop. no. obs =1 Subpop. size =6.3 132 3 528 Design df = 0 [JewEd] 68 Part-Time Child 3 percentage obs Yes 10 0 1 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. je d 68d y c3: 1. Child3 In day camp, 6-8? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 1 Number of obs = 1 Number of PSUs = 1 Population size =6.3 132 3 528 Subpop. no. obs =1 Subpop. size =6.3 132 3 528 Design df = 0 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 61 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1093 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:25 2017 Page 47 [JewEd] 68 Day Camp Child 3 percentage obs No 10 0 1 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. je d 68o v c3: 1. Child3 In overnight camp, 6-8? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 1 Number of obs = 1 Number of PSUs = 1 Population size =6.3 132 3 528 Subpop. no. obs =1 Subpop. size =6.3 132 3 528 Design df = 0 [JewEd] 68 Ovn Camp Child 3 percentage obs No 10 0 1 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. je d 68m s p3: 1. Child3 In MSP, 6-8? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 1 Number of obs = 1 Number of PSUs = 1 Population size =6.3 132 3 528 Subpop. no. obs =1 Subpop. size =6.3 132 3 528 Design df = 0 [JewEd] 68 MSP Child 3 percentage obs No 10 0 1 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. je d 912 p t3: 1. Child3 In part-time school, 9-12? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 2 Number of obs = 3 Number of PSUs = 3 Population size =20 .291 6 172 Subpop. no. obs =3 Subpop. size =20 .291 6 172 Design df = 1 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 62 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1094 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:25 2017 Page 48 [JewEd] 912 Part-Time Child 3 percentage obs No 8 4 2 Yes 1 6 1 Total 10 0 3 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns je d 912 d yc3 : 1. Child3 In day camp, 9-12? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 2 Number of obs = 3 Number of PSUs = 3 Population size =20 .291 6 172 Subpop. no. obs =3 Subpop. size =20 .291 6 172 Design df = 1 [JewEd] 912 Day Camp Child 3 percentage obs No 10 0 3 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. je d 912 o vc3 : 1. Child3 In overnight camp, 9-12? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 2 Number of obs = 3 Number of PSUs = 3 Population size =20 .291 6 172 Subpop. no. obs =3 Subpop. size =20 .291 6 172 Design df = 1 [JewEd] 912 Ovn Camp Child 3 percentage obs No 8 4 2 Yes 1 6 1 Total 10 0 3 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns je d 912 b byo 3 : 1. Child3 In BBYO, 9-12? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 2 Number of obs = 3 Number of PSUs = 3 Population size =20 .291 6 172 Subpop. no. obs =3 Subpop. size =20 .291 6 172 Design df = 1 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 63 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1095 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:26 2017 Page 49 [JewEd] 912 BBYO Child 3 percentage obs No 8 4 2 Yes 1 6 1 Total 10 0 3 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns je d isr 3 : 1. Child3 Done Israel trip, 9-12? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 2 Number of obs = 3 Number of PSUs = 3 Population size =20 .291 6 172 Subpop. no. obs =3 Subpop. size =20 .291 6 172 Design df = 1 [JewEd] Isr Trip Child 3 percentage obs No 10 0 3 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. 74 . 75 . foreach x of varlist hhchrelrsd3_joth { 2 . note l `x' 3 . count if `x'!=" " & hhjewish==1 4 . } hh c hre l rsd 3 _jo t h: 1 . C hil d 3 I s th i s c h ild bei n g r a ise d … 1 76 . 77 . ********* 78 . *Child 4 79 . ********* 80 . 81 . foreach x of varlist hhchage_4 hhchgrd4 hhchgender4 hhchrlt4 jedjpk4 jedpk4 jedk5pt4 jedk5dyc4 jedk5ovc4 2 . note l `x' 3 . svy, subpop(hhjewish): tab `x', per format (%20.0fc) stubw(30) obs 4 . } hh c hag e _4: 1. Child4 What is {his/her/their} age? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 1 Number of obs = 3 Number of PSUs = 3 Population size =8.1 823 2 822 Subpop. no. obs =3 Subpop. size =8.1 823 2 822 Design df = 2 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 64 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1096 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:26 2017 Page 50 RECODE of hhchage4 (Child age 4) percentage obs 0-5 3 3 1 7-12 6 7 2 Total 10 0 3 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns hh c hgr d 4: 1. Child4 What grade was {he/she/this child} in during the 2016-17 school year? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 1 Number of obs = 4 Number of PSUs = 4 Population size =21 .819 5 419 Subpop. no. obs =4 Subpop. size =21 .819 5 419 Design df = 3 Child grade 4 percentage obs Not yet in kindergarten 6 3 1 K-5 3 8 3 Total 10 0 4 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns hh c hge n der 4 : 1 . C hil d 4 I s th i s c h ild … (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 1 Number of obs = 4 Number of PSUs = 4 Population size =21 .819 5 419 Subpop. no. obs =4 Subpop. size =21 .819 5 419 Design df = 3 Child gender 4 percentage obs Male 1 3 1 Female 8 8 3 Total 10 0 4 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns hh c hrl t 4: 1. Child4 What is your relationship to {him/her/this child}? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 1 Number of obs = 4 Number of PSUs = 4 Population size =21 .819 5 419 Subpop. no. obs =4 Subpop. size =21 .819 5 419 Design df = 3 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 65 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1097 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:26 2017 Page 51 Child relationship 4 percentage obs Your child 10 0 4 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. je d jpk 4 : 1. Child4 In Jewish pre-k? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 1 Number of obs = 1 Number of PSUs = 1 Population size =13 .637 2 137 Subpop. no. obs =1 Subpop. size =13 .637 2 137 Design df = 0 [JewEd] J Pre-K Child 4 percentage obs Yes 10 0 1 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. je d pk4 : 1. Child4 In non-Jewish pre-k? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 1 Number of obs = 1 Number of PSUs = 1 Population size =13 .637 2 137 Subpop. no. obs =1 Subpop. size =13 .637 2 137 Design df = 0 [JewEd] NJ Pre-K Child 4 percentage obs No 10 0 1 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. je d k5p t 4: 1. Child4 In part-time school, K-5? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 1 Number of obs = 3 Number of PSUs = 3 Population size =8.1 823 2 822 Subpop. no. obs =3 Subpop. size =8.1 823 2 822 Design df = 2 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 66 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1098 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:26 2017 Page 52 [JewEd] K5 Part-Time Child 4 percentage obs No 3 3 1 Yes 6 7 2 Total 10 0 3 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns je d k5d y c4: 1. Child4 In day camp, K-5? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 1 Number of obs = 3 Number of PSUs = 3 Population size =8.1 823 2 822 Subpop. no. obs =3 Subpop. size =8.1 823 2 822 Design df = 2 [JewEd] K5 Day Camp Child 4 percentage obs No 10 0 3 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. je d k5o v c4: 1. Child4 In overnight camp, K-5? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 1 Number of obs = 3 Number of PSUs = 3 Population size =8.1 823 2 822 Subpop. no. obs =3 Subpop. size =8.1 823 2 822 Design df = 2 [JewEd] K5 Ovn Camp Child 4 percentage obs No 10 0 3 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. 82 . 83 . 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 67 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1099 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:26 2017 Page 53 84 . ********* 85 . *Location/Residence 86 . ********* 87 . 88 . foreach x of varlist locown locsechome locsecwhere locsecprim locyears_dec locyearsseason_dec locsecpla 2 . note l `x' 3 . svy, subpop(respjewish): tab `x', per format (%20.0fc) stubw(30) obs 4 . } lo c own : 1 . T hin k ing abo u t y o ur r esi d enc e in Gre a ter Nap l es, do y ou… (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 875 Number of PSUs = 875 Population size =5 ,24 4 .26 Subpop. no. obs =873 Subpop. size =5,2 36.0 777 Design df = 866 Own or rent percentage obs Rent 6 7 1 Own 9 4 80 2 Total 10 0 87 3 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns lo c sec h ome : 1. Aside from where you live in Greater Naples, do you have another residence? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 873 Number of PSUs = 873 Population size =5,2 41.5 807 Subpop. no. obs =871 Subpop. size =5,2 33.3 984 Design df = 864 Own second home percentage obs No 5 7 47 6 Yes 4 3 39 5 Total 10 0 87 1 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns lo c sec w her e : 1. Where is that other residence? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 396 Number of PSUs = 396 Population size =2,2 72.8 204 Subpop. no. obs =394 Subpop. size =2 ,264 .638 Design df = 387 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 68 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1100 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:26 2017 Page 54 Where second home percentage obs Florida 1 2 2 2 Other Southern United States 4 2 1 Northeastern United States 4 8 18 3 Midwestern United States 2 8 13 9 Western United States 2 9 Rest of world 6 2 0 Total 10 0 39 4 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns lo c sec p rim : 1. Would you consider your Greater Naples address your primary residence? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 392 Number of PSUs = 392 Population size =2,2 64.4 585 Subpop. no. obs =390 Subpop. size =2,2 56.2 761 Design df = 383 Local home primary percentage obs No 3 1 14 1 Yes 6 9 24 9 Total 10 0 39 0 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns lo c yea r s_d e c: 1. How long have you lived in the Greater Naples area? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 725 Number of PSUs = 725 Population size =4,5 13.6 289 Subpop. no. obs =723 Subpop. size =4,5 05.4 466 Design df = 716 RECODE of locyears (Years in Naples) percentage obs -1 0 1 0-9 yrs 3 3 24 6 10-19 yrs 4 6 30 2 20-29 yrs 1 4 12 8 30-39 yrs 5 3 4 40-49 yrs 1 8 50-59 yrs 0 1 208 0 1 2009 0 1 2011 0 1 Total 10 0 72 3 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 69 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1101 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:26 2017 Page 55 lo c yea r sse a son _dec : 1. How long have you owned/rented a home in Greater Naples? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 7 Number of obs = 143 Number of PSUs = 143 Population size =71 7 .53 8 882 Subpop. no. obs =141 Subpop. size =70 9 .35 6 554 Design df = 136 RECODE of locyearsseason (Years in Naples: Seasonal) percentage obs 0-9 yrs 4 6 6 2 10-19 yrs 3 2 5 8 20-29 yrs 2 1 1 6 30-39 yrs 1 4 40-49 yrs 0 1 Total 10 0 14 1 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns lo c sec p lan s : 1. Do you anticipate changing the length of time you spend each year in the Greater Naples area? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 389 Number of PSUs = 389 Population size =2,2 10.4 214 Subpop. no. obs =387 Subpop. size =2,2 02.2 391 Design df = 380 Plans for future: Seasonal percentage obs No 6 4 26 8 Yes, increasing 3 4 10 9 Yes, decreasing 2 1 0 Total 10 0 38 7 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns lo c plo t : 1. Do you have a personal or family burial plot in the Greater Naples area? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 881 Number of PSUs = 881 Population size =5,2 50.1 056 Subpop. no. obs =879 Subpop. size =5,2 41.9 232 Design df = 872 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 70 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1102 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:26 2017 Page 56 Burial Plot percentage obs No, I do not have one 5 9 45 5 No, I have one elsewhere 3 5 34 9 Yes 5 7 1 I don t know 1 4 Total 10 0 87 9 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns 89 . 90 . note l locsecwhen lo c sec w hen : 1. What part of the year do you spend in the Greater Naples area? 91 . count if locsecwhen!=" " & hhjewish==1 3 86 92 . 93 . 94 . ********* 95 . *Holocaust Survivor 96 . ********* 97 . foreach x of varlist holsurvhh holsurvresp holsurvadct holchildhh holchildresp holchildadct holchildchct 2 . note l `x' 3 . svy, subpop(hhjewish): tab `x', per format (%20.0fc) stubw(30) obs 4 . } ho l sur v hh: 1. Does anyone in your household consider themselves to be a Holocaust Survivor or refugee from Nazism? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 8 Number of obs = 420 Number of PSUs = 420 Population size =2,5 45.8 384 Subpop. no. obs =420 Subpop. size =2,5 45.8 384 Design df = 412 Holocuast survivor in HH percentage obs No 9 8 41 0 Yes, me 1 6 Yes, someone else 0 4 Total 10 0 42 0 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns ho l sur v res p : 1. Do you consider yourself to be a Holocaust Survivor or refugee from Nazism? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 6 Number of obs = 109 Number of PSUs = 109 Population size =84 6 .18 4 098 Subpop. no. obs =109 Subpop. size =84 6 .18 4 098 Design df = 103 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 71 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1103 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:26 2017 Page 57 Holocuast survivor is R percentage obs No 9 4 10 4 Yes 6 5 Total 10 0 10 9 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns ho l sur v adc t : 1. How many people are Holocaust Survivors or refugees from Nazism? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 1 Number of obs = 4 Number of PSUs = 4 Population size =8.0 639 1 138 Subpop. no. obs =4 Subpop. size =8.0 639 1 138 Design df = 3 Holocuast survivor adult ct percentage obs 1 5 8 3 9 4 2 1 Total 10 0 4 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns ho l chi l dhh : 1. Does anyone in your household consider themselves to be a descendant of a Holocaust Survivor or refu (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 706 Number of PSUs = 706 Population size =4,0 44.8 035 Subpop. no. obs =706 Subpop. size =4,0 44.8 035 Design df = 697 Child of HS in HH percentage obs No 8 5 58 3 Yes, me 9 6 6 Yes, someone else 4 3 8 Yes, both me and someone else 2 1 9 Total 10 0 70 6 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns ho l chi l dre s p: 1. Do you consider yourself to be a descendant of a Holocaust Survivor or refugee from Nazism? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 6 Number of obs = 65 Number of PSUs = 65 Population size =42 0 .81 2 522 Subpop. no. obs =65 Subpop. size =42 0 .81 2 522 Design df = 59 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 72 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1104 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:26 2017 Page 58 Child of HS is R percentage obs No 7 7 5 1 Yes 2 3 1 4 Total 10 0 6 5 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns ho l chi l dad c t: 1. How many {other} adults? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 6 Number of obs = 54 Number of PSUs = 54 Population size =22 1 .64 6 058 Subpop. no. obs =54 Subpop. size =22 1 .64 6 058 Design df = 48 Child of HS adult ct percentage obs 1 7 7 4 3 2 2 3 1 0 4 1 1 Total 10 0 5 4 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns ho l chi l dch c t: 1. How many children? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 2 Number of obs = 3 Number of PSUs = 3 Population size =22 .896 9 345 Subpop. no. obs =3 Subpop. size =22 .896 9 345 Design df = 1 Child of HS child ct percentage obs 1 4 0 2 4 6 0 1 Total 10 0 3 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns 98 . 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 73 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1105 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:26 2017 Page 59 99 . ********* 100 . *J Education 101 . ********* 102 . foreach x of varlist pkno_cost pkno_oth pknoimp_cost pknoimp_oth pjlib jedpkpast jednosch_cost jednosch > himp_unwelcome jednoschimp_oth jedtut { 2 . note l `x' 3 . svy, subpop(hhjewish): tab `x', per format (%20.0fc) stubw(30) obs 4 . } pk n o_c o st: 1. [Which of the following are reasons that your children are not currently enrolled in a Jewish presch (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 916 Number of PSUs = 916 Population size =5,6 20.5 687 Subpop. no. obs =916 Subpop. size =5,6 20.5 687 Design df = 907 No pre-k: Cost percentage obs Not selected 10 0 91 5 Yes 0 1 Total 10 0 91 6 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns pk n o_o t h: 1. [Which of the following are reasons that your children are not currently enrolled in a Jewish presch (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 916 Number of PSUs = 916 Population size =5,6 20.5 687 Subpop. no. obs =916 Subpop. size =5,6 20.5 687 Design df = 907 No pre-k: Other percentage obs Not selected 10 0 91 5 Yes 0 1 Total 10 0 91 6 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns pk n oim p _co s t: 1. [Which is the most important?] Cost (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 1 Number of obs = 1 Number of PSUs = 1 Population size =2.7 274 4 274 Subpop. no. obs =1 Subpop. size =2.7 274 4 274 Design df = 0 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 74 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1106 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:26 2017 Page 60 No pre-k: Cost Important percentage obs Very important 10 0 1 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. pk n oim p _ot h : 1. [Which is the most important?] Other (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 1 Number of obs = 1 Number of PSUs = 1 Population size =13 .273 3 278 Subpop. no. obs =1 Subpop. size =13 .273 3 278 Design df = 0 No pre-k: Other Important percentage obs Very important 10 0 1 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. pj l ib: 1. Does any child in your household receive books from PJ (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 4 Number of obs = 27 Number of PSUs = 27 Population size =15 5 .74 1 889 Subpop. no. obs =27 Subpop. size =15 5 .74 1 889 Design df = 23 Participates in PJ Library percentage obs No 1 3 4 Yes 8 7 2 3 Total 10 0 2 7 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns je d pkp a st: 1. {Did the child / Did any of the children} in grades K-12 attend a Jewish preschool or daycare progra (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 6 Number of obs = 50 Number of PSUs = 50 Population size =18 5 .29 4 502 Subpop. no. obs =50 Subpop. size =18 5 .29 4 502 Design df = 44 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 75 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1107 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:26 2017 Page 61 Former Jewish pre-k percentage obs No 2 8 1 4 Yes 7 2 3 6 Total 10 0 5 0 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns je d nos c h_c o st: 1. [Which of the following are reasons that the children in your household are not currently enrolled i (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 916 Number of PSUs = 916 Population size =5,6 20.5 687 Subpop. no. obs =916 Subpop. size =5,6 20.5 687 Design df = 907 No JewEd: Cost percentage obs Not selected 10 0 91 4 Yes 0 2 Total 10 0 91 6 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns je d nos c h_u n wel c ome : 1. [Which of the following are reasons that the children in your household are not currently enrolled i inclusive to my family (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 916 Number of PSUs = 916 Population size =5,6 20.5 687 Subpop. no. obs =916 Subpop. size =5,6 20.5 687 Design df = 907 No JewEd: Not welcoming to family percentage obs Not selected 10 0 91 5 Yes 0 1 Total 10 0 91 6 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns je d nos c h_o t h: 1. [Which of the following are reasons that the children in your household are not currently enrolled i (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 916 Number of PSUs = 916 Population size =5,6 20.5 687 Subpop. no. obs =916 Subpop. size =5,6 20.5 687 Design df = 907 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 76 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1108 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:26 2017 Page 62 No JewEd: Other percentage obs Not selected 10 0 91 3 Yes 0 3 Total 10 0 91 6 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns je d nos c him p _co s t: 1. [Which is the most important?] Cost (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 1 Number of obs = 1 Number of PSUs = 1 Population size =26 .892 7 574 Subpop. no. obs =1 Subpop. size =26 .892 7 574 Design df = 0 No JewEd: Cost Important percentage obs Very important 10 0 1 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. je d nos c him p _un w elc o me: 1. [Which is the most important?] Not welcoming or inclusive to my family (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 1 Number of obs = 1 Number of PSUs = 1 Population size =1.1 438 2 219 Subpop. no. obs =1 Subpop. size =1.1 438 2 219 Design df = 0 No JewEd: Not welcoming to family Important percentage obs Very important 10 0 1 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns Only one row category. Statistics cannot be computed. je d nos c him p _ot h : 1. [Which is the most important?] Other (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 1 Number of obs = 2 Number of PSUs = 2 Population size =7 .770 9 161 Subpop. no. obs =2 Subpop. size =7 .770 9 161 Design df = 1 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 77 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1109 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:26 2017 Page 63 No JewEd: Other Important percentage obs A little important 8 7 1 Very important 1 3 1 Total 10 0 2 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns je d tut : 1. Does [the/any] child participate in any Jewish education conducted remotely (e.g., online with a tea (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 6 Number of obs = 56 Number of PSUs = 56 Population size =24 3 .46 7 351 Subpop. no. obs =56 Subpop. size =24 3 .46 7 351 Design df = 50 Child in Jewish tutoring / other percentage obs No 9 7 5 3 Yes 3 3 Total 10 0 5 6 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns 103 . note l pkno_othtxt pk n o_o t htx t : 1. What is the other reason? 104 . count if pkno_othtxt!=" " & hhjewish==1 1 105 . 106 . 107 . ********* 108 . *Young Adults 109 . ********* 110 . foreach x of varlist yastud yadeg yasigoth yarelrelig yamarj yakidsj { 2 . note l `x' 3 . svy, subpop(respjewish): tab `x', per format (%20.0fc) stubw(30) obs 4 . } ya s tud : 1. Are you currently a student in a degree-granting program in a college or university? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 4 Number of obs = 45 Number of PSUs = 45 Population size =2 1 7.1 4 938 Subpop. no. obs =43 Subpop. size =20 8 .96 7 051 Design df = 41 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 78 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1110 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:26 2017 Page 64 YA student percentage obs No 9 7 4 1 Yes, full-time 3 2 Total 10 0 4 3 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns ya d eg: 1. What level of schooling are you currently enrolled in? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 1 Number of obs = 4 Number of PSUs = 4 Population size =14 .276 9 842 Subpop. no. obs =2 Subpop. size =6.0 946 5 599 Design df = 3 YA degree program percentage obs Master 4 5 1 Professional/PhD 5 5 1 Total 10 0 2 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns ya s igo t h: 1 . D o y o u c u rre n tly hav e a f ian c é/e , pa r tne r or sig n ifi c ant oth e r w h o y o u d o no t li v e w i th? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 3 Number of obs = 14 Number of PSUs = 14 Population size =47 .611 8 681 Subpop. no. obs =12 Subpop. size =39 .429 5 399 Design df = 11 YA has significant other percentage obs No 8 2 9 Yes 1 8 3 Total 10 0 1 2 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns ya r elr e lig : 1. What is the religion of your significant other? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 3 Number of obs = 5 Number of PSUs = 5 Population size =15 .366 9 123 Subpop. no. obs =3 Subpop. size =7.1 845 8 411 Design df = 2 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 79 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1111 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:26 2017 Page 65 Significant other's religion percentage obs Jewish 6 2 2 Another religion 3 8 1 Total 10 0 3 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns ya m arj : 1. How important is to you to marry someone Jewish? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 3 Number of obs = 15 Number of PSUs = 15 Population size =4 9 .89 9 962 Subpop. no. obs =13 Subpop. size =41 .717 6 338 Design df = 12 Importance of marrying Jews percentage obs Not important 5 1 A little important 1 5 2 Somewhat important 8 1 Very important 2 4 5 I don't plan on getting marrie 4 8 4 Total 10 0 1 3 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns ya k ids j : 1. How important is it to you to raise Jewish children? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 3 Number of obs = 29 Number of PSUs = 29 Population size =92 .077 4 175 Subpop. no. obs =27 Subpop. size =83 .895 0 893 Design df = 26 Importance of Jewish kids percentage obs Somewhat important 1 8 4 Very important 5 1 1 6 I don t plan on having kids 3 1 7 Total 10 0 2 7 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 80 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1112 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:26 2017 Page 66 111 . 112 . foreach x of varlist yainttxt yarelrelig_oth { 2 . note l `x' 3 . count if hhjewish==1 & `x'!=" " 4 . } ya i ntt x t: 1. In what ways, if any, would you like to become more involved with the Greater Naples Jewish communit 1 5 ya r elr e lig _oth : 1. What is the religion of your significant other? 1 113 . 114 . ********* 115 . *Subpopulations 116 . ********* 117 . foreach x of varlist interhh glbhh glbresp glbct polvote { 2 . note l `x' 3 . svy, subpop(hhjewish): tab `x', per format (%20.0fc) stubw(30) obs 4 . } in t erh h : 1. Are you or anyone in your household currently in an interfaith relationship? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 8 Number of obs = 67 Number of PSUs = 67 Population size =36 7 .10 0 008 Subpop. no. obs =67 Subpop. size =36 7 .10 0 008 Design df = 59 HH has interfaith couple percentage obs No 7 7 4 3 Yes 2 3 2 4 Total 10 0 6 7 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns gl b hh: 1. Do you or anyone in your household consider themselves to be gay, lesbian, or bisexual? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 700 Number of PSUs = 700 Population size =4,0 10.0 689 Subpop. no. obs =700 Subpop. size =4,0 10.0 689 Design df = 691 HH has GLB individual percentage obs No 10 0 69 2 Yes, me 0 3 Yes, someone else 0 3 Yes, both me and someone else 0 2 Total 10 0 70 0 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 81 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1113 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:26 2017 Page 67 gl b res p : 1. Is that you or someone else? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 7 Number of obs = 167 Number of PSUs = 167 Population size =1 ,209 .653 Subpop. no. obs =167 Subpop. size =1 ,209 .653 Design df = 160 Respondent is GLB percentage obs No 9 8 16 3 Yes 2 4 Total 10 0 16 7 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns gl b ct: 1. How many adults? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 2 Number of obs = 5 Number of PSUs = 5 Population size =13 .972 9 047 Subpop. no. obs =5 Subpop. size =13 .972 9 047 Design df = 3 GLB adults percentage obs 0 2 0 1 1 5 6 3 2 2 4 1 Total 10 0 5 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns po l vot e : 1. Are you registered to vote in the Greater Naples area? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 871 Number of PSUs = 871 Population size =5,2 50.4 409 Subpop. no. obs =871 Subpop. size =5,2 50.4 409 Design df = 862 Vote in Naples percentage obs No 1 5 15 2 Yes 8 5 71 9 Total 10 0 87 1 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 82 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1114 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:26 2017 Page 68 118 . 119 . ********* 120 . *Synagogues 121 . ********* 122 . foreach x of varlist rlsynany rlsynformer rlsyn_shalomorig rlsyn_tikvaorig rlsyn_chabadorig rlsyn_marcoo > orig rlsynseasonalorig rlsynno_norelig rlsynno_nokids rlsynno_cost rlsynno_social rlsynno_fit rlsynno_we 2 . note l `x' 3 . svy, subpop(hhjewish): tab `x', per format (%20.0fc) stubw(30) obs 4 . } rl s yna n y: 1. Do you or anyone in your household currently belong to any Jewish congregation, such as a synagogue, congregation? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 864 Number of PSUs = 864 Population size =5,2 21.7 488 Subpop. no. obs =864 Subpop. size =5,2 21.7 488 Design df = 855 Belong to a synagogue percentage obs No 5 8 27 8 Yes 4 2 58 6 Total 10 0 86 4 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns rl s ynf o rme r : 1. Did you formerly belong to a Jewish congregation during your adult life? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 276 Number of PSUs = 276 Population size =3,0 17.3 342 Subpop. no. obs =276 Subpop. size =3,0 17.3 342 Design df = 267 Former synagogue member percentage obs No 3 2 6 1 Yes 6 8 21 5 Total 10 0 27 6 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns rl s yn_s hal o mor i g: 1 . [Do y ou o r a n yon e in you r ho u seh o ld b elo n g t o …] T emp l e S h alo m (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 399 Number of PSUs = 399 Population size =1 ,598 .012 Subpop. no. obs =399 Subpop. size =1 ,598 .012 Design df = 390 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 83 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1115 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:26 2017 Page 69 Temple Shalom percentage obs No 5 8 18 5 Yes, and I pay dues 3 8 20 0 Yes, and I do not pay dues 3 1 4 Total 10 0 39 9 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns rl s yn_t ikv a ori g : 1 . [Do y ou o r a n yon e in you r ho u seh o ld b elo n g t o …] B eth Tik v a (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 298 Number of PSUs = 298 Population size =1,2 06.6 756 Subpop. no. obs =298 Subpop. size =1,2 06.6 756 Design df = 289 Beth Tikva percentage obs No 8 3 21 3 Yes, and I pay dues 1 5 7 4 Yes, and I do not pay dues 2 1 1 Total 10 0 29 8 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns rl s yn_c hab a dor i g: 1 . [Do y ou o r a n yon e in you r ho u seh o ld b elo n g t o …] C hab a d J e wis h Ce n ter of N apl e s (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 8 Number of obs = 283 Number of PSUs = 283 Population size =1,2 23.6 428 Subpop. no. obs =283 Subpop. size =1,2 23.6 428 Design df = 275 Chabad percentage obs No 8 1 21 3 Yes, and I pay dues 1 1 4 7 Yes, and I do not pay dues 8 2 3 Total 10 0 28 3 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns rl s yn_m arc o ori g : 1 . [Do y ou o r a n yon e in you r ho u seh o ld b elo n g t o …] J ewi s h C o ngr e gat i on o f M a rco Isl a nd (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 8 Number of obs = 261 Number of PSUs = 261 Population size =1 ,142 .178 Subpop. no. obs =261 Subpop. size =1 ,142 .178 Design df = 253 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 84 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1116 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:26 2017 Page 70 Jewish Congregation Marco Island percentage obs No 8 5 21 4 Yes, and I pay dues 1 4 4 1 Yes, and I do not pay dues 1 6 Total 10 0 26 1 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns rl s yn_n apl e sor i g: 1 . [Do y ou o r a n yon e in you r ho u seh o ld b elo n g t o …] N apl e s J e wis h Co n gre g ati o n (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 8 Number of obs = 257 Number of PSUs = 257 Population size =1,1 36.7 068 Subpop. no. obs =257 Subpop. size =1,1 36.7 068 Design df = 249 Naples Jewish Congregation percentage obs No 9 2 22 2 Yes, and I pay dues 8 3 2 Yes, and I do not pay dues 1 3 Total 10 0 25 7 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns rl s yn_h uma n ist o rig : 1 . [Do y ou o r a n yon e in you r ho u seh o ld b elo n g t o …] H uma n ist i c J e wis h Ch a vur a h (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 8 Number of obs = 231 Number of PSUs = 231 Population size =1 ,06 5 .13 Subpop. no. obs =231 Subpop. size =1 ,06 5 .13 Design df = 223 Humanistic Jewish Chavurah percentage obs No 9 8 22 7 Yes, and I pay dues 2 3 Yes, and I do not pay dues 0 1 Total 10 0 23 1 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 574 Number of PSUs = 574 Population size =2,1 25.4 889 Subpop. no. obs =574 Subpop. size =2,1 25.4 889 Design df = 565 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 85 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1117 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:26 2017 Page 71 Other congregation percentage obs No 9 2 53 1 Yes, and I pay dues 7 3 7 Yes, and I do not pay dues 1 6 Total 10 0 57 4 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns rl s yns e aso n alo r ig: 1. Do you or anyone in your household belong to any Jewish congregation outside of the Greater Naples a (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 577 Number of PSUs = 577 Population size =2,1 48.1 443 Subpop. no. obs =577 Subpop. size =2,1 48.1 443 Design df = 568 Other congregation: Seasonal percentage obs No 4 4 29 5 Yes 5 6 28 2 Total 10 0 57 7 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns rl s ynn o _no r eli g : 1. [Which of the following are reasons that your household {does not belong / no longer belongs} to a J (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 8 Number of obs = 171 Number of PSUs = 171 Population size =2,1 24.0 934 Subpop. no. obs =171 Subpop. size =2,1 24.0 934 Design df = 163 No synag: Not religious percentage obs No 2 7 4 4 Yes 7 3 12 7 Total 10 0 17 1 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns rl s ynn o _no k ids : 1. [Which of the following are reasons that your household {does not belong / no longer belongs} to a J (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 8 Number of obs = 118 Number of PSUs = 118 Population size =1,3 76.9 588 Subpop. no. obs =118 Subpop. size =1,3 76.9 588 Design df = 110 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 86 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1118 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:26 2017 Page 72 No synag: No kids percentage obs No 5 3 4 5 Yes 4 7 7 3 Total 10 0 11 8 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns rl s ynn o _co s t: 1. [Which of the following are reasons that your household {does not belong / no longer belongs} to a J (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 8 Number of obs = 152 Number of PSUs = 152 Population size =1,5 22.5 673 Subpop. no. obs =152 Subpop. size =1,5 22.5 673 Design df = 144 No synag: Cost percentage obs No 5 5 5 6 Yes 4 5 9 6 Total 10 0 15 2 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns rl s ynn o _so c ial : 1. [Which of the following are reasons that your household {does not belong / no longer belongs} to a J (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 7 Number of obs = 83 Number of PSUs = 83 Population size =1,0 82.9 069 Subpop. no. obs =83 Subpop. size =1,0 82.9 069 Design df = 76 No synag: Social reason percentage obs No 8 4 6 2 Yes 1 6 2 1 Total 10 0 8 3 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns rl s ynn o _fi t : 1 . [Whi c h o f th e fo l low i ng a re r eas o ns t hat you r ho u seh o ld {doe s no t be l ong / n o lo n ger bel o ngs } (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 7 Number of obs = 124 Number of PSUs = 124 Population size =1,3 86.9 805 Subpop. no. obs =124 Subpop. size =1,3 86.9 805 Design df = 117 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 87 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1119 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:26 2017 Page 73 No synag: No fit percentage obs No 6 0 5 5 Yes 4 0 6 9 Total 10 0 12 4 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns rl s ynn o _we l c: 1. [Which of the following are reasons that your household {does not belong / no longer belongs} to a J (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 7 Number of obs = 88 Number of PSUs = 88 Population size =1,1 21.8 713 Subpop. no. obs =88 Subpop. size =1,1 21.8 713 Design df = 81 No synag: Not welcoming to family percentage obs No 9 0 7 0 Yes 1 0 1 8 Total 10 0 8 8 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns rl s ynn o _ot h : 1. [Which of the following are reasons that your household {does not belong / no longer belongs} to a J (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 7 Number of obs = 112 Number of PSUs = 112 Population size =1,4 65.7 891 Subpop. no. obs =112 Subpop. size =1,4 65.7 891 Design df = 105 No synag: Other percentage obs No 3 8 4 7 Yes 6 2 6 5 Total 10 0 11 2 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns 123 . note l rlsynno_othtxt rl s ynn o _ot h txt : 1. What is that other reason? 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 88 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1120 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:26 2017 Page 74 124 . count if rlsynno_othtxt!=" " & hhjewish==1 5 1 125 . 126 . ********* 127 . *Ritual 128 . ********* 129 . foreach x of varlist rlsynsvc rlholhigh rlykfast rlshabcand rlseder rlhcndl rlkosh { 2 . note l `x' 3 . svy, subpop(respjewish): tab `x', per format (%20.0fc) stubw(30) obs 4 . } rl s yns v c: 1. Aside from special occasions like weddings and funerals, how often do you attend any type of organiz (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 860 Number of PSUs = 860 Population size =5,1 59.0 374 Subpop. no. obs =858 Subpop. size =5,1 50.8 551 Design df = 851 Frequency attend services percentage obs Never 2 9 8 4 Once or twice a year 3 2 24 5 Every few months 2 1 22 9 Once a month 6 9 7 Two or three times a month 5 10 5 Weekly or more 7 9 8 Total 10 0 85 8 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns rl h olh i gh: 1. Did you attend any High Holiday services this past fall? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 775 Number of PSUs = 775 Population size =3,7 34.8 246 Subpop. no. obs =773 Subpop. size =3,7 26.6 423 Design df = 766 Attend High Holiday services in past year percentage obs No 2 9 13 8 Yes 7 1 63 5 Total 10 0 77 3 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 860 Number of PSUs = 860 Population size =5,1 58.7 191 Subpop. no. obs =858 Subpop. size =5,1 50.5 368 Design df = 851 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 89 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1121 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:26 2017 Page 75 Fasted Yom Kippur percentage obs Whole day 2 9 35 9 Part of day 1 5 12 8 Medical Reason 1 1 14 3 No 4 6 22 8 Total 10 0 85 8 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns rl s hab c and : 1. How often do you or someone in your household light Shabbat candles on a Friday night? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 859 Number of PSUs = 859 Population size =5,1 31.4 452 Subpop. no. obs =857 Subpop. size =5,1 23.2 629 Design df = 850 Light Shabbat candles percentage obs Never 5 9 40 1 Sometimes 2 9 30 2 Usually 4 6 5 Always 8 8 9 Total 10 0 85 7 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns rl s ede r : 1 . [In a ty p ica l ye a r, d o y o u o r an y one in y our hou s eho l d…] Att e nd o r h o ld a Pa s sov e r s e der (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 858 Number of PSUs = 858 Population size =5,1 01.7 038 Subpop. no. obs =856 Subpop. size =5,0 93.5 215 Design df = 849 Attend seder in past year percentage obs No 1 9 6 9 Yes 8 1 78 7 Total 10 0 85 6 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns rl h cnd l : 1 . [In a ty p ica l ye a r, d o y o u o r an y one in y our hou s eho l d…] Lig h t H a nuk k ah c and l es (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 850 Number of PSUs = 850 Population size =4,9 08.7 805 Subpop. no. obs =848 Subpop. size =4,9 00.5 982 Design df = 841 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 90 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1122 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:26 2017 Page 76 Light Chanukah candles in past year percentage obs No 2 3 7 5 Yes 7 7 77 3 Total 10 0 84 8 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns rl k osh : 1. Which of the following best describes your current practices regarding keeping kosher? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 864 Number of PSUs = 864 Population size =5,1 74.6 564 Subpop. no. obs =862 Subpop. size =5 ,166 .474 Design df = 855 Kosher practices percentage obs Don t follow kosher rules at a 7 9 58 5 Follow some kosher rules, like 1 6 20 1 Keep kosher only at home 3 4 3 Keep kosher all the time 2 3 3 Total 10 0 86 2 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns 130 . 131 . ********* 132 . *Jewish Life 133 . ********* 134 . foreach x of varlist jlfriend jlculture jlethnic jlrelig jlcomm jlantiworld jlanticollege jlantius jlant > ily jlconnseasonal { 2 . note l `x' 3 . svy, subpop(respjewish): tab `x', per format (%20.0fc) stubw(30) obs 4 . } jl f rie n d: 1. How many of the people you consider to be your closest friends are Jewish? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 846 Number of PSUs = 846 Population size =5,0 57.3 388 Subpop. no. obs =844 Subpop. size =5,0 49.1 564 Design df = 837 Number of Jewish friends percentage obs None 1 2 3 0 Some 2 7 19 4 About half 1 8 17 0 Most 3 9 40 8 All 3 4 2 Total 10 0 84 4 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 91 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1123 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:26 2017 Page 77 obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns jl c ult u re: 1 . [To y ou p ers o nal l y, t o w h at e xte n t i s be i ng J ewi s h a mat t er o f…] Cul t ure (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 839 Number of PSUs = 839 Population size =4,9 37.3 723 Subpop. no. obs =837 Subpop. size =4,9 29.1 899 Design df = 830 Being Jewish is culture percentage obs Not at all 0 3 A little 6 2 7 Somewhat 2 0 16 1 Very much 7 3 64 6 Total 10 0 83 7 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns jl e thn i c: 1 . [To y ou p ers o nal l y, t o w h at e xte n t i s be i ng J ewi s h a mat t er o f…] Eth n ici t y (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 819 Number of PSUs = 819 Population size =4,8 20.6 041 Subpop. no. obs =817 Subpop. size =4,8 12.4 217 Design df = 810 Being Jewish is ethnicity percentage obs Not at all 5 4 0 A little 1 1 5 9 Somewhat 2 6 19 3 Very much 5 7 52 5 Total 10 0 81 7 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns jl r eli g : 1 . [To y ou p ers o nal l y, t o w h at e xte n t i s be i ng J ewi s h a mat t er o f…] Rel i gio n (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 825 Number of PSUs = 825 Population size =4,8 70.7 938 Subpop. no. obs =823 Subpop. size =4,8 62.6 115 Design df = 816 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 92 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1124 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:26 2017 Page 78 Being Jewish is religion percentage obs Not at all 1 5 3 5 A little 1 5 10 4 Somewhat 2 4 20 7 Very much 4 6 47 7 Total 10 0 82 3 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns jl c omm : 1 . [To y ou p ers o nal l y, t o w h at e xte n t i s be i ng J ewi s h a mat t er o f…] Com m uni t y (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 815 Number of PSUs = 815 Population size =4 ,744 .338 Subpop. no. obs =813 Subpop. size =4,7 36.1 557 Design df = 806 Being Jewish is community percentage obs Not at all 1 8 3 8 A little 1 4 8 8 Somewhat 2 6 24 5 Very much 4 2 44 2 Total 10 0 81 3 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns jl a nti w orl d : 1 . [How con c ern e d a r e y o u a b out ant i sem i tis m …] A rou n d t h e w o rld (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 846 Number of PSUs = 846 Population size =5,0 58.4 586 Subpop. no. obs =844 Subpop. size =5,0 50.2 763 Design df = 837 Concerned about global antisemitism percentage obs Not at all 0 1 A little 2 1 9 Somewhat 9 11 6 Very much 8 9 70 8 Total 10 0 84 4 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns jl a nti c oll e ge: 1 . [How con c ern e d a r e y o u a b out ant i sem i tis m …] O n U S co l leg e ca m pus e s (running tabulate on estimation sample) 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 93 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1125 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:26 2017 Page 79 Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 829 Number of PSUs = 829 Population size =4,9 37.0 108 Subpop. no. obs =827 Subpop. size =4,9 28.8 285 Design df = 820 Concerned about college antisemitism percentage obs Not at all 1 1 0 A little 6 3 7 Somewhat 1 6 15 3 Very much 7 6 62 7 Total 10 0 82 7 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns jl a nti u s: 1 . [How con c ern e d a r e y o u a b out ant i sem i tis m …] I n t h e U n ite d St a tes exc e pt c oll e ge c amp u ses (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 836 Number of PSUs = 836 Population size =5,0 35.0 692 Subpop. no. obs =834 Subpop. size =5,0 26.8 869 Design df = 827 Concerned about US antisemitism percentage obs Not at all 1 3 A little 7 5 5 Somewhat 1 7 20 3 Very much 7 6 57 3 Total 10 0 83 4 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns jl a nti n apl e s: 1 . [How con c ern e d a r e y o u a b out ant i sem i tis m …] I n t h e G r eat e r N a ple s ar e a (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 835 Number of PSUs = 835 Population size =4 ,935 .819 Subpop. no. obs =833 Subpop. size =4,9 27.6 367 Design df = 826 Concerned about local antisemitism percentage obs Not at all 8 6 3 A little 2 2 20 6 Somewhat 2 5 26 8 Very much 4 5 29 6 Total 10 0 83 3 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 94 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1126 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:27 2017 Page 80 jl c onn i sr: 1 . [To w hat ext e nt d o y o u…] Fee l a c onn e cti o n t o Is r ael (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 849 Number of PSUs = 849 Population size =5,0 52.5 518 Subpop. no. obs =847 Subpop. size =5,0 44.3 695 Design df = 840 Connection to Israel percentage obs Not at all 1 0 2 6 A little 1 1 9 7 Somewhat 3 0 24 7 Very much 4 9 47 7 Total 10 0 84 7 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns jl c onn w orl d : 1 . [To w hat ext e nt d o y o u…] Fee l li k e p a rt o f a wor l dwi d e J e wis h co m mun i ty (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 837 Number of PSUs = 837 Population size =4,9 37.4 802 Subpop. no. obs =835 Subpop. size =4,9 29.2 978 Design df = 828 Connection to worldwide Jewish community percentage obs Not at all 6 2 3 A little 1 4 9 6 Somewhat 3 3 25 1 Very much 4 7 46 5 Total 10 0 83 5 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns jl c onn n ap: 1 . [To w hat ext e nt d o y o u…] Fee l li k e p a rt o f t h e J e wis h co m mun i ty i n t h e G r eat e r N a ple s ar e a (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 845 Number of PSUs = 845 Population size =5,0 54.1 218 Subpop. no. obs =843 Subpop. size =5,0 45.9 395 Design df = 836 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 95 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1127 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:27 2017 Page 81 Connection to Naples Jewish community percentage obs Not at all 1 7 5 8 A little 2 5 15 9 Somewhat 3 3 28 3 Very much 2 5 34 3 Total 10 0 84 3 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns jl c onn d ail y : 1 . [To w hat ext e nt d o y o u…] Fee l th a t J u dai s m i s pa r t o f yo u r d a ily lif e (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 841 Number of PSUs = 841 Population size =4 ,959 .726 Subpop. no. obs =839 Subpop. size =4,9 51.5 437 Design df = 832 Feel Judaism is part of daily life percentage obs Not at all 2 3 7 9 A little 2 7 20 1 Somewhat 2 4 24 8 Very much 2 6 31 1 Total 10 0 83 9 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns jl c onn s eas o nal : 1 . [To w hat ext e nt d o y o u…] Fee l li k e p a rt o f t h e J e wis h co m mun i ty w her e yo u ha v e a n oth e r h o me (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 381 Number of PSUs = 381 Population size =2,1 75.6 855 Subpop. no. obs =379 Subpop. size =2,1 67.5 032 Design df = 372 Connection to 2nd home J community percentage obs Not at all 2 2 4 3 A little 1 7 6 4 Somewhat 2 8 10 2 Very much 3 3 17 0 Total 10 0 37 9 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 96 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1128 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:27 2017 Page 82 135 . 136 . ********* 137 . *Israel 138 . ********* 139 . foreach x of varlist isrnum isrtypetag isrtag isrtypefed isrfedint isrrelfriend isrnews { 2 . note l `x' 3 . svy, subpop(respjewish): tab `x', per format (%20.0fc) stubw(30) obs 4 . } is r num : 1. How many times, if any, have you been to Israel? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 845 Number of PSUs = 845 Population size =5,0 67.5 596 Subpop. no. obs =843 Subpop. size =5,0 59.3 772 Design df = 836 Times been to Israel percentage obs Never 3 8 22 8 Once 2 7 24 9 Twice 1 3 13 3 Three times 9 7 2 Four or more times 9 13 3 I previously lived in Israel 3 2 8 Total 10 0 84 3 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns is r typ e tag : 1. Did you ever participate in a Taglit-Birthright Israel trip? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 4 Number of obs = 43 Number of PSUs = 43 Population size =20 1 .16 5 006 Subpop. no. obs =41 Subpop. size =19 2 .98 2 678 Design df = 39 Been to Israel on Taglit percentage obs No 8 6 3 5 Yes 1 4 6 Total 10 0 4 1 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns is r tag : 1. Did you ever apply to go on a Taglit-Birthright Israel trip? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 5 Number of obs = 55 Number of PSUs = 55 Population size =25 5 .08 6 195 Subpop. no. obs =53 Subpop. size =24 6 .90 3 867 Design df = 50 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 97 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1129 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:27 2017 Page 83 Applied to Taglit percentage obs No 9 7 5 2 Yes 3 1 Total 10 0 5 3 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 612 Number of PSUs = 612 Population size =3,1 21.4 706 Subpop. no. obs =610 Subpop. size =3,1 13.2 882 Design df = 603 Been to Israel on federation trip percentage obs Yes 3 0 22 4 No but interested 2 0 13 5 No and uninterested 5 0 25 1 Total 10 0 61 0 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns is r fed i nt: 1. Would you be interested in participating in a federation, synagogue, or solidarity mission to Israel (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 224 Number of PSUs = 224 Population size =1,8 69.3 389 Subpop. no. obs =222 Subpop. size =1,8 61.1 566 Design df = 215 Interested in federation trip percentage obs No 5 9 12 0 Yes 4 1 10 2 Total 10 0 22 2 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 846 Number of PSUs = 846 Population size =5,0 63.7 794 Subpop. no. obs =844 Subpop. size =5 ,055 .597 Design df = 837 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 98 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1130 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:27 2017 Page 84 Relatives or friends in Israel percentage obs None 6 1 45 0 Friend 8 9 7 Family 2 3 20 0 Both 8 9 7 Total 10 0 84 4 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns is r new s : 1. In the past month, how often did you actively seek out news about Israel? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 847 Number of PSUs = 847 Population size =5,0 66.1 516 Subpop. no. obs =845 Subpop. size =5,0 57.9 693 Design df = 838 Seek out news about Israel percentage obs Never 2 1 10 5 Once or twice 2 5 19 6 Once a week 1 2 12 6 Every few days 2 2 21 2 Once a day 1 3 14 5 Several times a day 7 6 1 Total 10 0 84 5 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns 140 . 141 . ********* 142 . *Oragnizations 143 . ********* 144 . foreach x of varlist orgimpisr orgimprcult orgimpsoc orgimpedu { 2 . note l `x' 3 . svy, subpop(respjewish): tab `x', per format (%20.0fc) stubw(30) obs 4 . } or g imp i sr: 1. [When it comes to the activities and organizations that you are involved with, how important are eac (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 821 Number of PSUs = 821 Population size =4,5 35.7 502 Subpop. no. obs =819 Subpop. size =4,5 27.5 679 Design df = 812 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 99 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1131 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:27 2017 Page 85 Interested in Israel percentage obs Not at all 1 8 10 2 A little 2 3 14 1 Somewhat 3 0 28 2 Very much 2 9 29 4 Total 10 0 81 9 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns or g imp r cul t : 1. [When it comes to the activities and organizations that you are involved with, how important are eac Culture (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 811 Number of PSUs = 811 Population size =4,4 99.9 787 Subpop. no. obs =809 Subpop. size =4,4 91.7 963 Design df = 802 Interested in Culture percentage obs Not at all 1 2 5 4 A little 1 7 13 2 Somewhat 3 8 33 0 Very much 3 4 29 3 Total 10 0 80 9 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns or g imp s oc: 1. [When it comes to the activities and organizations that you are involved with, how important are eac Activities (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 819 Number of PSUs = 819 Population size =4,5 34.6 246 Subpop. no. obs =817 Subpop. size =4,5 26.4 423 Design df = 810 Interested in Social activities percentage obs Not at all 1 0 5 6 A little 1 6 12 0 Somewhat 4 1 38 1 Very much 3 3 26 0 Total 10 0 81 7 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns or g imp e du: 1. [When it comes to the activities and organizations that you are involved with, how important are eac (running tabulate on estimation sample) 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 100 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1132 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:27 2017 Page 86 Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 819 Number of PSUs = 819 Population size =4,5 36.9 422 Subpop. no. obs =817 Subpop. size =4,5 28.7 598 Design df = 810 Interested in Education percentage obs Not at all 1 0 5 8 A little 1 5 12 7 Somewhat 3 6 31 5 Very much 3 8 31 7 Total 10 0 81 7 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns 145 . 146 . foreach x of varlist orgmcawca orgmem orgmemseason orggroups orggroupsseason { 2 . note l `x' 3 . svy, subpop(hhjewish): tab `x', per format (%20.0fc) stubw(30) obs 4 . } or g mca w ca: 1 . D o y o u o r an y one in y our hou s eho l d b e lon g to the Wom e n’s Cul t ura l Al l ian c e o r Me n ’s C ult u ral A (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 828 Number of PSUs = 828 Population size =4,7 92.6 672 Subpop. no. obs =828 Subpop. size =4,7 92.6 672 Design df = 819 MCA/WCA Member percentage obs No 6 2 40 0 Yes 3 8 42 8 Total 10 0 82 8 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns or g mem : 1. Aside from congregations and the WCA/MCA, are you or anyone in your household a member of any formal (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 830 Number of PSUs = 830 Population size =4,7 99.0 353 Subpop. no. obs =830 Subpop. size =4,7 99.0 353 Design df = 821 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 101 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1133 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:27 2017 Page 87 Organization member percentage obs Neither 6 0 37 1 Yes, in Naples 1 2 14 3 Yes, nationally 1 6 15 8 Both 1 2 15 8 Total 10 0 83 0 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns or g mem s eas o n: 1. Are you or anyone in your household a member of any formal Jewish organizations or clubs where you h (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 369 Number of PSUs = 369 Population size =1,9 88.1 329 Subpop. no. obs =369 Subpop. size =1,9 88.1 329 Design df = 360 Organization member: seasonal percentage obs No 6 2 19 2 Yes 3 8 17 7 Total 10 0 36 9 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns or g gro u ps: 1. Do you or anyone in your household belong to an informal Jewish group? (e.g., Mah Jongg group, Jewis (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 830 Number of PSUs = 830 Population size =4,8 24.2 838 Subpop. no. obs =830 Subpop. size =4,8 24.2 838 Design df = 821 Group member percentage obs No 6 8 49 0 Yes 3 2 34 0 Total 10 0 83 0 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns or g gro u pss e aso n : 1. Are any of those groups based in the Greater Naples Jewish community? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 8 Number of obs = 185 Number of PSUs = 185 Population size =90 8 .99 8 692 Subpop. no. obs =185 Subpop. size =90 8 .99 8 692 Design df = 177 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 102 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1134 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:27 2017 Page 88 Group member: seasonal percentage obs No 2 7 4 7 Yes 7 3 13 8 Total 10 0 18 5 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns 147 . 148 . foreach x of varlist orgdues_loc orgdues_nat orgdues_sec orgpart_loc orgpart_sec orgread_nat orgread_loc > sec volsupp_loc volsupp_nat volsupp_sec volpart_loc volpart_sec { 2 . note l `x' 3 . svy, subpop(respjewish): tab `x', per format (%20.0fc) stubw(30) obs 4 . } or g due s _lo c : 1 . [Asi d e f r om a sy n ago g ue, did you pay due s to …] A Jew i sh o rga n iza t ion in G rea t er N apl e s (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 793 Number of PSUs = 793 Population size =4,6 45.2 661 Subpop. no. obs =791 Subpop. size =4,6 37.0 838 Design df = 784 Pays dues: Local percentage obs No 5 6 32 3 Yes 4 4 46 8 Total 10 0 79 1 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns or g due s _na t : 1 . [Asi d e f r om a sy n ago g ue, did you pay due s to …] A nat i ona l Je w ish org a niz a tio n (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 762 Number of PSUs = 762 Population size =4,5 72.2 233 Subpop. no. obs =760 Subpop. size =4 ,564 .041 Design df = 753 Pays dues: National percentage obs No 6 6 39 9 Yes 3 4 36 1 Total 10 0 76 0 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns or g due s _se c : 1 . [Asi d e f r om a sy n ago g ue, did you pay due s to …] A Jew i sh o rga n iza t ion whe r e y o u h a ve y our oth e r (running tabulate on estimation sample) 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 103 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1135 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:27 2017 Page 89 Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 339 Number of PSUs = 339 Population size =1,8 86.0 833 Subpop. no. obs =337 Subpop. size =1 ,877 .901 Design df = 330 Pays dues: Seasonal percentage obs No 5 1 14 0 Yes 4 9 19 7 Total 10 0 33 7 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns or g par t _lo c : 1. [How often did you attend or participate in a program, event, or class (not religious services)?] in (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 807 Number of PSUs = 807 Population size =4,6 98.0 709 Subpop. no. obs =805 Subpop. size =4,6 89.8 885 Design df = 798 Participated: Local percentage obs Never 4 1 16 8 Less than once a month 3 1 32 5 At least once a month 2 8 31 2 Total 10 0 80 5 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns or g par t _se c : 1. [How often did you attend or participate in a program, event, or class (not religious services)?] wh (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 357 Number of PSUs = 357 Population size =1,9 05.2 977 Subpop. no. obs =355 Subpop. size =1,8 97.1 153 Design df = 348 Participated: National percentage obs Never 3 6 10 4 Less than once a month 4 0 15 6 At least once a month 2 4 9 5 Total 10 0 35 5 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns or g rea d _na t : 1. [How often did you read material (e.g., newsletter, magazine, website, etc.)?] by a national Jewish (running tabulate on estimation sample) 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 104 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1136 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:27 2017 Page 90 Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 797 Number of PSUs = 797 Population size =4,6 86.2 989 Subpop. no. obs =795 Subpop. size =4,6 78.1 166 Design df = 788 Read material: national percentage obs Never 3 0 12 2 Less than once a month 2 5 19 6 At least once a month 4 5 47 7 Total 10 0 79 5 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns or g rea d _lo c : 1. [How often did you read material (e.g., newsletter, magazine, website, etc.)?] by a Greater Naples J (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 803 Number of PSUs = 803 Population size =4,6 91.9 808 Subpop. no. obs =801 Subpop. size =4,6 83.7 985 Design df = 794 Read material: Local percentage obs Never 3 1 13 0 Less than once a month 2 6 22 9 At least once a month 4 3 44 2 Total 10 0 80 1 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns or g rea d _se c : 1. [How often did you read material (e.g., newsletter, magazine, website, etc.)?] by a Jewish organizat (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 364 Number of PSUs = 364 Population size =1,9 52.7 518 Subpop. no. obs =362 Subpop. size =1,9 44.5 695 Design df = 355 Read material: Seasonal percentage obs Never 2 8 8 0 Less than once a month 2 4 7 9 At least once a month 4 9 20 3 Total 10 0 36 2 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns vo l boa r d_l o c: 1. [Did you help in a leadership role (e.g., serve on a committee or board, plan an event or program)] (running tabulate on estimation sample) 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 105 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1137 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:27 2017 Page 91 Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 813 Number of PSUs = 813 Population size =4,7 59.7 316 Subpop. no. obs =811 Subpop. size =4,7 51.5 493 Design df = 804 Board member: Local percentage obs No 8 4 59 7 Yes 1 6 21 4 Total 10 0 81 1 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns vo l boa r d_n a t: 1. [Did you help in a leadership role (e.g., serve on a committee or board, plan an event or program)] (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 803 Number of PSUs = 803 Population size =4,7 32.5 379 Subpop. no. obs =801 Subpop. size =4,7 24.3 555 Design df = 794 Board member: National percentage obs No 9 5 72 8 Yes 5 7 3 Total 10 0 80 1 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns vo l boa r d_s e c: 1. [Did you help in a leadership role (e.g., serve on a committee or board, plan an event or program)] other home (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 8 Number of obs = 363 Number of PSUs = 363 Population size =1,9 85.9 061 Subpop. no. obs =361 Subpop. size =1,9 77.7 238 Design df = 355 Board member: Seasonal percentage obs No 8 3 27 0 Yes 1 7 9 1 Total 10 0 36 1 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns vo l sup p _lo c : 1. [Did you provide support services (e.g., raise funds, do administrative tasks)] for a Greater Naples (running tabulate on estimation sample) 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 106 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1138 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:27 2017 Page 92 Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 808 Number of PSUs = 808 Population size =4 ,734 .868 Subpop. no. obs =806 Subpop. size =4,7 26.6 857 Design df = 799 Support service: Local percentage obs No 7 9 55 8 Yes 2 1 24 8 Total 10 0 80 6 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns vo l sup p _na t : 1. [Did you provide support services (e.g., raise funds, do administrative tasks)] For a national Jewis (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 796 Number of PSUs = 796 Population size =4,6 34.4 806 Subpop. no. obs =794 Subpop. size =4,6 26.2 983 Design df = 787 Support service: National percentage obs No 9 1 68 4 Yes 9 11 0 Total 10 0 79 4 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns vo l sup p _se c : 1. [Did you provide support services (e.g., raise funds, do administrative tasks)] For a Jewish organiz (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 8 Number of obs = 365 Number of PSUs = 365 Population size =1,9 83.9 522 Subpop. no. obs =363 Subpop. size =1,9 75.7 699 Design df = 357 Support service: Seasonal percentage obs No 7 9 26 5 Yes 2 1 9 8 Total 10 0 36 3 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns vo l par t _lo c : 1. [In the past month, did you help as a participant (e.g., tutor, serve meals at a food pantry, park c Naples Jewish organization (running tabulate on estimation sample) 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 107 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1139 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:27 2017 Page 93 Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 812 Number of PSUs = 812 Population size =4,7 44.4 129 Subpop. no. obs =810 Subpop. size =4,7 36.2 305 Design df = 803 Vol participant: Local percentage obs No 8 6 65 6 Yes 1 4 15 4 Total 10 0 81 0 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns vo l par t _se c : 1. [In the past month, did you help as a participant (e.g., tutor, serve meals at a food pantry, park c organization where you have your other home (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 367 Number of PSUs = 367 Population size =1,9 75.4 616 Subpop. no. obs =365 Subpop. size =1,9 67.2 793 Design df = 358 Vol participant: Seasonal percentage obs No 9 3 32 8 Yes 7 3 7 Total 10 0 36 5 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns 149 . 150 . ********* 151 . *Jewish Activities 152 . ********* 153 . foreach x of varlist actshabdin act_eat act_talk act_online act_culture act_text { 2 . note l `x' 3 . svy, subpop(respjewish): tab `x', per format (%20.0fc) stubw(30) obs 4 . } ac t sha b din : 1. In the past month, for how many weeks did you have or attend a special meal for Shabbat? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 810 Number of PSUs = 810 Population size =4,7 05.2 046 Subpop. no. obs =808 Subpop. size =4,6 97.0 223 Design df = 801 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 108 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1140 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:27 2017 Page 94 Shabbat meal percentage obs Never 8 2 57 1 One week 1 0 12 7 Two or three times 5 6 0 Every week 4 5 0 Total 10 0 80 8 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns ac t _ea t : 1. [In the past month, how often did you participate in the following activities?] Eat traditional Jewi (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 810 Number of PSUs = 810 Population size =4,7 45.1 992 Subpop. no. obs =808 Subpop. size =4,7 37.0 169 Design df = 801 Activity: Food percentage obs Never 4 2 26 3 Once or twice 3 3 32 3 Once a week 1 1 11 1 Every few days 1 0 8 8 Once a day or more 3 2 3 Total 10 0 80 8 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns ac t _ta l k: 1. [In the past month, how often did you participate in the following activities?] Talk about Jewish to (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 809 Number of PSUs = 809 Population size =4,7 48.7 215 Subpop. no. obs =807 Subpop. size =4,7 40.5 392 Design df = 800 Activity: Talked percentage obs Never 1 4 5 4 Once or twice 3 5 22 3 Once a week 1 7 15 5 Every few days 2 2 23 7 Once a day or more 1 1 13 8 Total 10 0 80 7 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns ac t _on l ine : 1. [In the past month, how often did you participate in the following activities?] Look for Jewish info (running tabulate on estimation sample) 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 109 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1141 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:27 2017 Page 95 Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 812 Number of PSUs = 812 Population size =4,7 60.5 975 Subpop. no. obs =810 Subpop. size =4,7 52.4 152 Design df = 803 Activity: Internet percentage obs Never 3 9 23 5 Once or twice 2 5 19 7 Once a week 1 4 11 9 Every few days 1 0 13 7 Once a day or more 1 2 12 2 Total 10 0 81 0 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns ac t _cu l tur e : 1. [In the past month, how often did you participate in the following activities?] Access Jewish-focuse (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 813 Number of PSUs = 813 Population size =4,7 08.0 882 Subpop. no. obs =811 Subpop. size =4,6 99.9 059 Design df = 804 Activity: Culture percentage obs Never 5 1 29 3 Once or twice 2 8 26 9 Once a week 8 9 4 Every few days 7 9 7 Once a day or more 6 5 8 Total 10 0 81 1 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns ac t _te x t: 1. [In the past month, how often did you participate in the following activities?] Study a Jewish relig (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 818 Number of PSUs = 818 Population size =4,7 72.0 878 Subpop. no. obs =816 Subpop. size =4,7 63.9 054 Design df = 809 Activity: Study percentage obs Never 7 9 57 1 Once or twice 1 0 10 8 Once a week 5 8 5 Every few days 2 3 4 Once a day or more 3 1 8 Total 10 0 81 6 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 110 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1142 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:27 2017 Page 96 154 . 155 . ********* 156 . *Philanthropy 157 . ********* 158 . foreach x of varlist charany charjew charlocal charorg_syn charorg_fed charorg_jed charorg_serv charorg_ 2 . note l `x' 3 . svy, subpop(respjewish): tab `x', per format (%20.0fc) stubw(30) obs 4 . } ch a ran y : 1. Over the past year, did you make any charitable donations? Please include donations to both Jewish a (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 811 Number of PSUs = 811 Population size =4,7 38.0 423 Subpop. no. obs =809 Subpop. size =4 ,72 9 .86 Design df = 802 Any donation last year percentage obs No 8 3 8 Yes 9 2 77 1 Total 10 0 80 9 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns ch a rje w : 1. Over the past year, which of the following best describes the charities to which you made monetary c (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 770 Number of PSUs = 770 Population size =4,3 61.8 914 Subpop. no. obs =768 Subpop. size =4 ,353 .709 Design df = 761 Type of donated orgs percentage obs All Jewish 5 3 4 Mostly Jewish 2 9 29 2 About equal 2 9 27 6 Mostly non-Jewish 2 3 13 5 All non-Jewish 1 3 3 1 Total 10 0 76 8 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns ch a rlo c al: 1. How many of the Jewish organizations you donated to are based in Greater Naples? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 739 Number of PSUs = 739 Population size =3,7 78.9 787 Subpop. no. obs =737 Subpop. size =3,7 70.7 963 Design df = 730 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 111 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1143 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:27 2017 Page 97 Location of donated J orgs percentage obs None 2 8 10 9 Some 4 8 43 6 Most 1 0 10 4 All 1 3 8 8 Total 10 0 73 7 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns ch a ror g _sy n : 1 . [Ove r th e pa s t y e ar, hav e yo u ma d e c h ari t abl e co n tri b uti o ns t o…] A s y nag o gue asi d e f r om d ues (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 728 Number of PSUs = 728 Population size =3,7 22.3 931 Subpop. no. obs =726 Subpop. size =3,7 14.2 108 Design df = 719 Donated to a synagogue percentage obs No 4 5 19 8 Yes 5 5 52 8 Total 10 0 72 6 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns ch a ror g _fe d : 1 . [Ove r th e pa s t y e ar, hav e yo u ma d e c h ari t abl e co n tri b uti o ns t o…] Jew i sh F ede r ati o n o f Co l lie r (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 724 Number of PSUs = 724 Population size =3,7 43.9 288 Subpop. no. obs =722 Subpop. size =3,7 35.7 465 Design df = 715 Donated to federation percentage obs No 4 0 19 2 Yes 6 0 53 0 Total 10 0 72 2 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns ch a ror g _je d : 1 . [Ove r th e pa s t y e ar, hav e yo u ma d e c h ari t abl e co n tri b uti o ns t o…] A J e wis h sc h ool or c amp (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 686 Number of PSUs = 686 Population size =3,5 96.1 924 Subpop. no. obs =684 Subpop. size =3 ,58 8 .01 Design df = 677 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 112 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1144 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:27 2017 Page 98 Donated to Jewish education percentage obs No 8 7 55 8 Yes 1 3 12 6 Total 10 0 68 4 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns ch a ror g _se r v: 1 . [Ove r th e pa s t y e ar, hav e yo u ma d e c h ari t abl e co n tri b uti o ns t o…] Jew i sh F ami l y & Com m uni t y S e r (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 698 Number of PSUs = 698 Population size =3,6 32.0 891 Subpop. no. obs =696 Subpop. size =3,6 23.9 067 Design df = 689 Donated to Jewish social services percentage obs No 7 7 45 3 Yes 2 3 24 3 Total 10 0 69 6 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns ch a ror g _ot h : 1 . [Ove r th e pa s t y e ar, hav e yo u ma d e c h ari t abl e co n tri b uti o ns t o…] Ano t her Jew i sh o rga n iza t ion ( (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 718 Number of PSUs = 718 Population size =3,6 90.2 953 Subpop. no. obs =716 Subpop. size =3 ,682 .113 Design df = 709 Donated to Other percentage obs No 4 9 31 8 Yes 5 1 39 8 Total 10 0 71 6 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns ch a rre q : 1. In the past year, did you receive any requests to make charitable donations to Jewish organizations (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 801 Number of PSUs = 801 Population size =4,7 45.8 169 Subpop. no. obs =799 Subpop. size =4,7 37.6 345 Design df = 792 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 113 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1145 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:27 2017 Page 99 Receive request to donate percentage obs No 4 2 18 9 Yes 5 8 61 0 Total 10 0 79 9 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns ch a rin c : 1 . I n t h e c o min g ye a r, d o y o u e x pec t yo u r c h ari t abl e gi v ing , bo t h i n - a n d o u tsi d e t h e J e wis h co m m (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 805 Number of PSUs = 805 Population size =4 ,650 .039 Subpop. no. obs =803 Subpop. size =4,6 41.8 567 Design df = 796 Plan to increase giving percentage obs Increase 1 3 13 8 Stay the same 7 5 63 0 Decrease 1 2 3 5 Total 10 0 80 3 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns ch a rwi l l: 1. Have you designated any Jewish organization in Greater Naples as a beneficiary in your will or estat (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 807 Number of PSUs = 807 Population size =4 ,746 .205 Subpop. no. obs =805 Subpop. size =4,7 38.0 226 Design df = 798 Bequest or will percentage obs No 9 3 73 5 Yes 4 4 7 I don t have a will 3 2 3 Total 10 0 80 5 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 114 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1146 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:27 2017 Page 100 159 . 160 . note l charorg_othtxt ch a ror g _ot h txt : 1. What is that other organization? 161 . count if charorg_othtxt!=" " & hhjewish==1 3 64 162 . 163 . ********* 164 . *Health & Well-Being 165 . ********* 166 . foreach x of varlist hlpar hlparloc hlparnh hlhealthad hlhealthkid hlment hlimpfunc hlhskpg hljewlife { 2 . note l `x' 3 . svy, subpop(hhjewish): tab `x', per format (%20.0fc) stubw(30) obs 4 . } hl p ar: 1. Do you {or your spouse or partner} manage care or personally provide care on a regular basis for an own? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 531 Number of PSUs = 531 Population size =3,0 85.1 033 Subpop. no. obs =531 Subpop. size =3,0 85.1 033 Design df = 522 Care for elderly relative percentage obs No 8 8 44 9 Yes 1 2 8 2 Total 10 0 53 1 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns hl p arl o c: 1. Do they live in the Greater Naples area? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 8 Number of obs = 81 Number of PSUs = 81 Population size =36 7 .47 7 251 Subpop. no. obs =81 Subpop. size =36 7 .47 7 251 Design df = 73 In Naples percentage obs No 6 5 4 7 Yes 3 5 3 4 Total 10 0 8 1 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns hl p arn h : 1. Do you {or your spouse or partner} have a parent who is currently a resident of an independent livin (running tabulate on estimation sample) 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 115 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1147 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:27 2017 Page 101 Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 531 Number of PSUs = 531 Population size =3,0 96.7 894 Subpop. no. obs =531 Subpop. size =3,0 96.7 894 Design df = 522 Parent in senior housing percentage obs No 8 8 45 8 Yes, in Greater Naples 4 2 4 Yes, elsewhere 7 4 8 Yes, both 0 1 Total 10 0 53 1 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns hl h eal t had : 1. Are any adults in your household in fair or poor health? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 638 Number of PSUs = 638 Population size =3,5 69.9 905 Subpop. no. obs =638 Subpop. size =3,5 69.9 905 Design df = 629 HH adult in fair/poor health percentage obs No 8 7 55 8 Yes 1 3 8 0 Total 10 0 63 8 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns hl h eal t hki d : 1. Are there any children in the household in fair or poor health? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 6 Number of obs = 57 Number of PSUs = 57 Population size =28 6 .65 1 685 Subpop. no. obs =57 Subpop. size =28 6 .65 1 685 Design df = 51 HH child in fair/poor health percentage obs No 9 9 5 6 Yes 1 1 Total 10 0 5 7 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns hl m ent : 1. During the past year, were counseling or other mental health services needed for anyone in your hous (running tabulate on estimation sample) 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 116 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1148 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:27 2017 Page 102 Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 794 Number of PSUs = 794 Population size =4,7 12.1 463 Subpop. no. obs =794 Subpop. size =4,7 12.1 463 Design df = 785 Mental health & counseling percentage obs No 9 0 70 8 Yes, and they were received 9 7 2 Yes, but they were not receive 1 1 4 Total 10 0 79 4 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns hl i mpf u nc: 1. Do you or anyone in your household have impaired function due to an intellectual, developmental, or (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 788 Number of PSUs = 788 Population size =4,6 63.3 762 Subpop. no. obs =788 Subpop. size =4,6 63.3 762 Design df = 779 Impaired function percentage obs No 9 0 70 0 Yes 1 0 8 8 Total 10 0 78 8 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns hl h skp g : 1. Do you or anyone in your household need assistance with housekeeping and home maintenance? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 788 Number of PSUs = 788 Population size =4,6 95.3 518 Subpop. no. obs =788 Subpop. size =4,6 95.3 518 Design df = 779 Housekeeping percentage obs No 8 7 71 4 Yes, and it was received 1 1 6 1 Yes, but it was not received 2 1 3 Total 10 0 78 8 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns hl j ewl i fe: 1. In the past year, were you {or anyone in your household} ever unable to participate in Jewish life b (running tabulate on estimation sample) 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 117 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1149 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:27 2017 Page 103 Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 799 Number of PSUs = 799 Population size =4,7 46.2 905 Subpop. no. obs =799 Subpop. size =4,7 46.2 905 Design df = 790 Health prohibited Jewish life percentage obs No 8 0 62 9 Yes 6 4 7 Does not apply 1 3 12 3 Total 10 0 79 9 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns 167 . 168 . foreach x of varlist hlrespnh hlhealthresp { 2 . note l `x' 3 . svy, subpop(respjewish): tab `x', per format (%20.0fc) stubw(30) obs 4 . } hl r esp n h: 1. Do you currently reside in an independent living, assisted living facility, or nursing home? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 8 Number of obs = 599 Number of PSUs = 599 Population size =3,8 00.3 333 Subpop. no. obs =597 Subpop. size =3,7 92.1 509 Design df = 591 R in senior housing percentage obs No 9 4 55 7 Yes 6 4 0 Total 10 0 59 7 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns hl h eal t hre s p: 1. Are you in fair or poor health? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 796 Number of PSUs = 796 Population size =4,6 36.6 187 Subpop. no. obs =794 Subpop. size =4,6 28.4 364 Design df = 787 R in fair/poor health percentage obs No 8 4 69 6 Yes 1 6 9 8 Total 10 0 79 4 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 118 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1150 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:27 2017 Page 104 169 . note l hljewlifetxt hl j ewl i fet x t: 1. In what way? 170 . count if hljewlifetxt!=" " & hhjewish==1 4 1 171 . 172 . ********* 173 . *Finances 174 . ********* 175 . foreach x of varlist wbemp_full wbemp_part wbemp_retire wbemp_unemp wbemp_look wbstan wbinc wbaid_retire > lth wbhard_job wbhard_pay wbhard_fore wbhard_business wbhard_divorce wbhard_death wbrent wbsaveexp wbjew 2 . note l `x' 3 . svy, subpop(hhjewish): tab `x', per format (%20.0fc) stubw(30) obs 4 . } wb e mp_f ull : 1 . [Inc l udi n g y o urs e lf, how man y ad u lts in y our hou s eho l d a r e…] Wor k ing ful l -ti m e f o r p a y (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 590 Number of PSUs = 590 Population size =3,7 05.4 253 Subpop. no. obs =590 Subpop. size =3,7 05.4 253 Design df = 581 Ct full-time workers percentage obs 0 7 4 39 4 1 2 1 14 3 2 6 5 2 3 0 1 Total 10 0 59 0 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns wb e mp_p art : 1 . [Inc l udi n g y o urs e lf, how man y ad u lts in y our hou s eho l d a r e…] Wor k ing par t -ti m e f o r p a y (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 548 Number of PSUs = 548 Population size =3,5 88.8 313 Subpop. no. obs =548 Subpop. size =3,5 88.8 313 Design df = 539 Ct part-time workers percentage obs 0 7 8 40 1 1 2 0 12 8 2 2 1 7 3 0 1 10 0 1 Total 10 0 54 8 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 119 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1151 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:27 2017 Page 105 wb e mp_r eti r e: 1 . [Inc l udi n g y o urs e lf, how man y ad u lts in y our hou s eho l d a r e…] Ret i red (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 697 Number of PSUs = 697 Population size =4,2 77.5 258 Subpop. no. obs =697 Subpop. size =4,2 77.5 258 Design df = 688 Ct retiree percentage obs 0 1 2 8 2 1 3 8 25 1 2 5 0 36 0 3 0 1 7 0 1 8 0 1 10 0 1 Total 10 0 69 7 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns wb e mp_u nem p : 1 . [Inc l udi n g y o urs e lf, how man y ad u lts in y our hou s eho l d a r e…] Une m plo y ed (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 498 Number of PSUs = 498 Population size =3,3 11.4 756 Subpop. no. obs =498 Subpop. size =3,3 11.4 756 Design df = 489 Ct unemployed percentage obs 0 9 4 45 4 1 5 3 2 2 1 1 1 3 0 1 Total 10 0 49 8 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns wb e mp_l ook : 1 . [Inc l udi n g y o urs e lf, how man y ad u lts in y our hou s eho l d a r e…] Cur r ent l y l o oki n g f o r w o rk (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 505 Number of PSUs = 505 Population size =3,3 28.4 044 Subpop. no. obs =505 Subpop. size =3,3 28.4 044 Design df = 496 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 120 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1152 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:27 2017 Page 106 Looking for work percentage obs 0 9 6 47 6 1 3 2 6 2 0 2 3 0 1 Total 10 0 50 5 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns wb s tan : 1 . W hic h of the fol l owi n g w o rds or p hra s es b est des c rib e s y o ur h ous e hol d ’s s tan d ard of l ivi n g? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 769 Number of PSUs = 769 Population size =4,6 08.2 004 Subpop. no. obs =769 Subpop. size =4,6 08.2 004 Design df = 760 Standard of living percentage obs Prosperous 1 5 13 9 Living very comfortably 4 7 36 0 Living reasonably comfortably 3 1 21 5 Just getting along 5 4 5 Nearly poor 1 6 Poor 1 4 Total 10 0 76 9 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns wb i nc: 1 . {Not inc l udi n g r o omm a tes but cou n tin g ev e ryo n e e l se w ho l ive s in the hou s eho l d,} Was you r ho u s (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 756 Number of PSUs = 756 Population size =4,5 17.8 886 Subpop. no. obs =756 Subpop. size =4,5 17.8 886 Design df = 747 Income percentage obs Less than $25,000 3 1 5 $25,000-49,999 1 3 3 2 $50,000-74,999 8 4 8 $75,000-99,999 5 5 0 $100,000-149,999 1 1 9 1 $150,000-199,999 9 6 3 $200,000 or more 1 6 14 6 I prefer not to answer 3 5 31 1 Total 10 0 75 6 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 121 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1153 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:27 2017 Page 107 wb a id_r eti r eme n t: 1. [Are you or anyone in your household currently receiving any of the following:] Social Security reti (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 770 Number of PSUs = 770 Population size =4,5 90.7 092 Subpop. no. obs =770 Subpop. size =4,5 90.7 092 Design df = 761 Receive Soc Security/Medicare percentage obs No 1 6 14 8 Yes 8 4 62 2 Total 10 0 77 0 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns wb a id_s ubs i die s : 1. [Are you or anyone in your household currently receiving any of the following:] Medicaid, food stamp assistance (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 741 Number of PSUs = 741 Population size =4,4 12.6 629 Subpop. no. obs =741 Subpop. size =4,4 12.6 629 Design df = 732 Receive Medicaid, food stamps percentage obs No 9 9 73 4 Yes 1 7 Total 10 0 74 1 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns wb a id_s upp l eme n t: 1 . [Are you or a nyo n e i n yo u r h o use h old cur r ent l y r e cei v ing any of t he f oll o win g :] S oci a l S e cur i t I nco m e (S SI) (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 740 Number of PSUs = 740 Population size =4,3 86.1 402 Subpop. no. obs =740 Subpop. size =4,3 86.1 402 Design df = 731 Receive SSDI percentage obs No 9 7 70 8 Yes 3 3 2 Total 10 0 74 0 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 122 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1154 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:28 2017 Page 108 wb h ard _hea l th: 1. [Did you or anyone in your household experience any of the following economic hardships in the past (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 774 Number of PSUs = 774 Population size =4,5 58.4 036 Subpop. no. obs =774 Subpop. size =4,5 58.4 036 Design df = 765 Hardship: health emergency percentage obs No 8 6 67 4 Yes 1 4 10 0 Total 10 0 77 4 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns wb h ard _job : 1. [Did you or anyone in your household experience any of the following economic hardships in the past (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 766 Number of PSUs = 766 Population size =4,5 30.8 622 Subpop. no. obs =766 Subpop. size =4,5 30.8 622 Design df = 757 Hardship: lost job percentage obs No 9 9 74 9 Yes 1 1 7 Total 10 0 76 6 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns wb h ard _pay : 1. [Did you or anyone in your household experience any of the following economic hardships in the past (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 769 Number of PSUs = 769 Population size =4,5 47.5 268 Subpop. no. obs =769 Subpop. size =4,5 47.5 268 Design df = 760 Hardship: reduced pay percentage obs No 9 7 74 8 Yes 3 2 1 Total 10 0 76 9 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns wb h ard _for e : 1. [Did you or anyone in your household experience any of the following economic hardships in the past (running tabulate on estimation sample) 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 123 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1155 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:28 2017 Page 109 Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 766 Number of PSUs = 766 Population size =4,5 37.7 082 Subpop. no. obs =766 Subpop. size =4,5 37.7 082 Design df = 757 Hardship: foreclosure percentage obs No 10 0 76 2 Yes 0 4 Total 10 0 76 6 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns wb h ard _bus i nes s : 1. [Did you or anyone in your household experience any of the following economic hardships in the past difficulty (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 766 Number of PSUs = 766 Population size =4,4 39.6 231 Subpop. no. obs =766 Subpop. size =4,4 39.6 231 Design df = 757 Hardshp: business closed percentage obs No 9 8 74 7 Yes 2 1 9 Total 10 0 76 6 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns wb h ard _div o rce : 1. [Did you or anyone in your household experience any of the following economic hardships in the past (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 767 Number of PSUs = 767 Population size =4,4 42.5 199 Subpop. no. obs =767 Subpop. size =4,4 42.5 199 Design df = 758 Hardship: Divorce percentage obs No 9 9 76 0 Yes 1 7 Total 10 0 76 7 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns wb h ard _dea t h: 1. [Did you or anyone in your household experience any of the following economic hardships in the past (running tabulate on estimation sample) 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 124 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1156 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:28 2017 Page 110 Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 762 Number of PSUs = 762 Population size =4,4 41.5 672 Subpop. no. obs =762 Subpop. size =4,4 41.5 672 Design df = 753 Hardship: Death percentage obs No 9 7 74 4 Yes 3 1 8 Total 10 0 76 2 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns wb r ent : 1. In the last year, did you ever have to skip a rent, mortgage, or utility bill payment because you co (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 769 Number of PSUs = 769 Population size =4,5 49.2 045 Subpop. no. obs =769 Subpop. size =4,5 49.2 045 Design df = 760 Skip rent percentage obs No 9 9 75 4 Yes 1 1 5 Total 10 0 76 9 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns wb s ave e xp: 1. Would you{r household} be able to pay an unexpected $400 emergency expense with cash, money currentl could pay in full? (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 764 Number of PSUs = 764 Population size =4,5 43.9 118 Subpop. no. obs =764 Subpop. size =4,5 43.9 118 Design df = 755 Unexpected expense percentage obs No 5 3 7 Yes 9 5 72 7 Total 10 0 76 4 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns wb j ewl i fe: 1. In the past year, were you {or anyone in your household} ever unable to participate in Jewish life b (running tabulate on estimation sample) 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 125 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1157 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:28 2017 Page 111 Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 777 Number of PSUs = 777 Population size =4,6 22.2 197 Subpop. no. obs =777 Subpop. size =4,6 22.2 197 Design df = 768 Finances prohibited Jewish life percentage obs No 8 7 67 8 Yes 4 3 9 Does not apply 9 6 0 Total 10 0 77 7 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns 176 . 177 . foreach x of varlist wbcol wbret { 2 . note l `x' 3 . svy, subpop(respjewish): tab `x', per format (%20.0fc) stubw(30) obs 4 . } wb c ol: 1. Overall, how confident are you that you {and your spouse or partner} will have enough money to provi (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 6 Number of obs = 49 Number of PSUs = 49 Population size =24 6 .88 0 096 Subpop. no. obs =47 Subpop. size =23 8 .69 7 768 Design df = 43 Saving for college percentage obs Not at all confident 7 6 Not very confident 1 2 Uncertain 1 5 6 Somewhat confident 4 8 2 1 Very confident 2 8 1 2 Total 10 0 4 7 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns wb r et: 1. Overall, how confident are you that you {and your spouse or partner} will have enough money to live (running tabulate on estimation sample) Number of strata = 9 Number of obs = 772 Number of PSUs = 772 Population size =4,6 01.7 126 Subpop. no. obs =770 Subpop. size =4,5 93.5 302 Design df = 763 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 126 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1158 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Tuesday September 12 09:37:28 2017 Page 112 Saving for retirement percentage obs Not at all confident 3 2 2 Not very confident 1 1 2 Uncertain 1 1 8 0 Somewhat confident 3 7 27 8 Very confident 4 7 37 8 Total 10 0 77 0 Key: percentage = cel l pe r cen t age obs = num b er o f o b ser v ati o ns 178 . 179 . note l wbjewlifetxt wb j ewl i fet x t: 1. In what way? 180 . count if wbjewlifetxt!=" " & hhjewish==1 3 1 181 . 182 . ********* 183 . *Concluding Thoughts 184 . ********* 185 . foreach x of varlist ctstr ctgap ctjorgs { 2 . note l `x' 3 . count if `x'!=" " & hhjewish==1 4 . } ct s tr: 1. Overall, what do you consider to be the strengths of the Greater Naples Jewish community? 5 80 ct g ap: 1. Overall, what programs, services, or organizations do you think are missing from the Greater Naples 4 86 ct j org s : 1. What could local Jewish organizations do, if anything, to make you feel more welcome in the Greater 4 43 186 . 187 . log close name: <u nna m ed> log: Z :\Na p les -C o lli e r C o unt y \Re p ort \6-C o deb o ok &In s tru m ent \Cod e boo k -F req u enc i es.s mcl log type: s m cl closed on: 1 2 Se p 20 1 7,0 9:3 6 :26 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 127 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1159 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Appendix C: Study Documentation 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 128 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1160 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Caller Training Protocol Brandeis University Calling Training For The Cohen Center for Modern Jewish Studies Greater Naples Community Study 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 129 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1161 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Purpose of Study This study is designed to learn about the lives of Jews living in the Greater Naples Area. The study will provide a description of the size and character of Naples-area Jewry. Study Mode This is a dual-mode study. Respondents are first contacted by e-mail. If e-mail contact fails, they are then contacted by phone. Your goal is to remind the respondents to do the survey online or to do it with you on the phone. This is a household study, so any adult in the household who is age 18 or over and related to the respondent is eligible to complete the survey. Calling Schedule Calls will be made Monday-Thursday from 6:00-9:00pm and on Sunday afternoons from 12:00- 4:00pm. On Sundays the building is sometimes locked. If this is the case, call the supervisor so they can let you in. Callbacks and/or daytime calling can be scheduled for any workday from 9:00am-5:00pm. We DO NOT make calls on Friday nights or on Saturdays. Using the CATI (Computer Assisted Telephone Interviewing system) Note on confidentiality: All information contained in the CATI or gathered during an interview is private and confidential.Do not access the CATI outside of work or for any purpose. Do not share information from the CATI with anyone. The phone numbers and e-mails were provided by the respondent with the understanding that we would maintain their privacy.We do not give out, share, or sell anyone’s information. We only use this information to try to reach people selected to participate in this study. To access the CATI, go to cc.cmjs.org. Click “Click here to log in now” and enter your e -mail and password. If you do not know your password, click the link under “If you are a registered user and have forgotten your password, click here.” You can check the box marked “automatically log me in next time” to make it easier in the future. Once you’ve logged in, click on “Surveys” (on the top left), then on “Start Calling” (on the left bar). 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 130 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1162 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Calling Lists You will then see your calling list – a list of respondent names, their last directive, last directive comment, and the time zone of the phone numbers in that case. Directives: The yellow arrow points to the Directive column. A directive is a one word summary of that case’s history. Once a case has been called more than once (later on in the survey), cases will also have directives of: Keep in Calling Rotation –Nothing special happened; we need to keep calling the person. Call Back Later –The person needs to be called back at a specific time. Daytime Call –The person needs to be called during the day (often used for work phone numbers). Language Barrier –The person reached does not speak/understand English. -- Hard Refusal –We reached the person we need, and they said that they do not want to participate. No Good Phone Numbers –All of the phone numbers we have for the person are not helpful (wrong number, disconnected, etc.) Supervisor Review –Something was unclear about the case and we wanted a supervisor to look into it. These three directives should NEVER be in a call list. If they are, tell the supervisor. 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 131 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1163 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Info: Next to the directives column is the info column, which has 2 green arrows over it. This tells you a slightly longer summary of the case’s history and will tell you WHY the previous caller picked the directive that they did. Always read the info column. The directive and directive info will NOT be visible once you click the “start” button and begin your call, so you MUST read them thoroughly beforehand. Time Zone: Next to the Info column is the Time Zone column, which has an orange arrow over it. Check to see if the time zone of the call that you are placing is listed. We do not call people before 9 AM their time or after 9 PM their time. When starting your list, first look for Call Back Later directives and make sure you note what time to call them. While waiting to make any scheduled “call back laters,”start from the top of your list and work your way down. To begin calling your list, click on the “start” button next to the respondent’s first name. !!If ever you are unsure about what the goal of a call is, or of what you should be doing, talk to your supervisor before placing a call!! 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 132 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1164 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 133 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1165 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Basic Respondent Information Once you have clicked on the START button next to a person’s name, you will see the respondent’s CATI calling page. You will see the respondent’s name in a large box on the left. If you discover during the course of a phone call that a respondent has changed his/her name or goes by a nickname, mark the directive as a Supervisor Review and describe the change that needs to be made in your comments (the supervisor will make the change). Next to the name box, you will see the following information (dark red arrow): Household name: The family name of the people in this household. You can use this when making calls, i.e.,“I’m calling the Goldberg household; may I please speak with Joseph or Sarah?” Additional family names: This is a list of additional names associated with this household; the names of anyone else who lives in the home —this could be spouses, parents, adult children, or any other relatives. Token: This is the unique number we use to identify each respondent. Survey Status (green arrow) Under the respondent’s name, you will see the status of the survey: “None,” “Partial” or “Complete.” A status of “Partial” means that the respondent began the survey but did not finish it. For cases like these, you will use an altered phone script to encourage the respondent to finish the survey. There is no need to call the respondent if the survey status says Complete. You will also see a banner in red font that looks like this: Attention: This person has completed the survey since this sample was created. There is no need to call them unless otherwise instructed. You may close this record. It is CRITICAL to check the status of survey completion before you pick up the phone. Partial Surveys You may have a respondent on your list who has completed part of the survey already. His/her survey status will say “partial survey.” Please mark these as “Supervisor review” and do not call them for the time being. E-mail Addresses (orange arrow) Below the Survey Status, you will see the e-mail addresses that we have for the respondent. Some people will have many e-mails listed, and some people will not have any e-mails at all. For many people this means that we only have information that we think is good, but for some people it means that we are left without any e-mail addresses at all. In these cases, one of the goals of the phone call is to get an active e-mail address for the respondent, since we cannot send them a survey without their e-mail. 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 134 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1166 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) If there are e-mails listed, each one will fall into one of three categories: Respondent, Parent, or Other. These categories do not apply, they are simply a way to list the emails associated with the household. When deciding what e-mail address to send an e-mail to, make sure to look closely at the e-mail addresses to see if you can tell if it’s the respondent’s e-mail or not. For example, if the e-mail address has the respondent’s initials or name in it, then you CAN e-mail that one even if it’s marked ‘other.’If there is any doubt, ask a supervisor. Do not send emails to email addresses that are marked as bounced. Call History (purple arrow) Call history is ordered by phone number. Each phone number will have a history of what happened every time that that number was called in the past. The history of each call has information about which caller made the call, when the call was made, the call outcome, and the call outcome comment. Just as a directive is a one-word summary of what happened in the entire attempt to reach a particular person, a call outcome is a short summary of what happened during that particular phone call. Possible call outcomes include: Hard Refusal –We reached the person we need, and they said that they do not want to participate. Soft Refusal –We reached the person we need, and they said they were too busy/seemed uninterested, but there is reason to think that they could be convinced to do the survey. Call Back Later –We reached someone who told us to call back later to reach the respondent. VM on Identified Machine –We left a voicemail on a machine that identified the respondent by name, or we know that this is the correct number for the respondent from someone else. VM on Identified Machine + E-mail –We left a voicemail on the identified machine of the respondent and sent an e-mail to the respondent. Will Pass Message to Respondent –We reached someone who said that they will pass the message to the respondent. VM on Confirmed Other Answering Machine –We left a voicemail on a machine that clearly stated a name, other than the respondent’s in the message. Language Barrier –We reached someone who does not speak English. Sent E-mail –We sent an e-mail to the respondent. Gave New Number –We reached someone who gave us a new number for the respondent. Disconnected –We reached a number that is disconnected. Rings Out –We reached a number that just keeps ringing without a voicemail. Wrong number –We reached someone who told us that we have the wrong number. Busy Signal –We reached a busy signal. Fax Number –We reached a fax machine. Automated VM –We reached a voicemail machine that does not have a person’s name in the message. VM Full –We reached a message that says that the voicemail box is full. Not Accepting Calls/VM Not Set Up –We reached a message that the number is not accepting messages or that the voicemail box is full. 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 135 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1167 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Message with New Number –We reached a message that says that the number we have is wrong, but lists a new number. Next to each call outcome will be a call outcome comment, which will provide detailed information of what happened during that call. It is critical to read the call history for each case before placing a call. For example, do not call people on a Tuesday if the call outcome says “please call back on a Wednesday or Thursday, not a Monday or Tuesday.” Sometimes there will also be Administrative Comments in the call history. These comments consist of important information that was added to the history by Sarah or a supervisor. Pay special attention to these comments because they may correct or explain some other aspect of the call history. Example: 512-555-5555 1st attempt. Sarah Harpaz. Wed, Jun 24, 2015. 7:43pm. Wrong Number. Reached the home number for the [redacted] family, they said they had never heard of the respondent and that they moved in two years ago. We cannot reach the respondent or their family here, do not call again. Admin.Viktoria Bedo. Thurs, Jun 25, 2015. 9:45am. Admin Comment. [Redacted] family called us back, gave us new number for the respondent. 512-555-5555 1st attempt. Sarah Harpaz. Wed, June 24, 2015. 7:40 pm. No contact. Number rings out. 2nd attempt. Shahar Hecht. Tue, July 7, 2015. 7:57 pm. Respondent Contact. Requested Call Back for July 8, 2010 at 5:00 pm EDT. Spoke with [redacted] and he’s willing to do the survey. I scheduled a call back. PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE READ THE CALL HISTORY BEFORE PLACING EACH AND EVERY CALL!! AFTER reading the entire call history, click on the button labeled “Call” to begin the call. 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 136 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1168 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Placing a Call Dial 8 + 1 + AREA CODE + 7-DIGIT NUMBER. The calling code for this project is [redacted]. Before you place a call, make sure you know what time it is at the destination you are calling. Placing a Call to Canada Dial 8 + 1+ XXX (area code) –XXX-XXXX (7-digit number). The calling code for this project is [redacted]. Before you place a call, make sure you know what time it is at the destination you are calling. How to Dial an International Number Dial 8-011-COUNTRY CODE-the number, then, when prompted, enter long-distance access code as usual. 8 tells Brandeis that you want an outside line. 011 tells the phone company that you are dialing another country. The country code, e.g., 972 for Israel, tells the phone company which country you are dialing. If a number in the CATI is missing its country code, just Google "Austria country code" and you will find it easily. The rest of the number is country-specific, but will usually include an area code of some sort plus a phone number. Often, you will have to leave off a leading 0 in an area code. For example, within Israel, you would dial 054-999-8888 for a cell phone, but from the United States you would dial 011-972-54-999-8888. There is often a long pause between dialing the number and the voice asking for the access code. Do not give up. Wait patiently. The ringing sound can vary from country to country. Israel's ringing sound is more of a beep, which sounds a little like a drawn out busy signal to the uninitiated, so check with a supervisor before marking a number as disconnected or busy. E-mail Only Some cases will only have an e-mail address available. If there is only an email in a case that has been assigned to you, mark the case ‘supervisor review’ and make it clear in your comment that there is only an email address for that respondent. A supervisor will take care of that case. 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 137 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1169 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Contact Protocol The script below is intended to be a starting point rather than something you must read word-for- word on every occasion. You should adjust what you say depending on your sense of the person you are speaking to. Above all, sound like an upbeat person, not a recorded message! Hello, is this the [HOUSEHOLD NAME] residence? (Start every scenario off like this unless for some reason you are not trying to reach the household. It is not necessary that we reach the respondent per say, but any adult in that household who can complete the survey.) If seems not known at this phone number [Probe for information:] Do you know where I can reach them? If not known: Thank you very much. If known but doesn’t live there: Hi, my name is [_____], and I’m calling from Brandeis University. How are you doing today? We are conducting a study of Jewish adults who live in the Greater Naples area for at least part of the year. We would like to contact the [HOUSEHOLD NAME] family to participate in our study. Would you be able to give me a phone number or email address to reach them? If lives at this number but is unavailable: Hi, my name is [_____], and I’m calling from Brandeis University. How are you doing today? We are conducting a study of Jewish adults who live in the Greater Naples area for at least part of the year. What is the best way for me to get in touch with an adult in that household? [Get a call back time, other phone number, or email address to send the survey link.] *Try to get a phone number (including overseas numbers) or e-mail! Otherwise schedule a call back* If person reached does not speak English: If you recognize the language he/she speaks and there is a caller who speaks that language close by, hand over the call to that caller. Otherwise say, “I will ask a colleague who speaks [foreign language] to call you later.” Mark case with a call outcome and directive of Language Barrier. Make sure you note in your comments what language you think the caller needs to be able to speak when calling back. You reach a workplace: Hi, my name is [_____], and I am calling from Brandeis University. We are trying to reach [RESPONDENT] with regard to a study that we are conducting. 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 138 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1170 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) [If respondent no longer works there]: Would you be able to give me their forwarding contact information? [If respondent currently works there but is unavailable]: Would you be able to ask them to give us a call back at 781-736-2964 or email us at n-a-p-l-e-s@brandeis.edu? If respondent: We are conducting a study of Jewish adults that live in the Greater Naples area for at least part of the year, on behalf of the Jewish Federation of Collier County. The survey will take about 25 minutes to complete. Your participation in the survey is entirely voluntary. If you wish, you may decline to answer specific questions and you may conclude the survey at any point with no obligation. If you have 25 minutes now, I’m happy to do it with you over the phone. Are you at least 18 years old? [If no, explain that participants must be at least 18 years old, see if there is another person in the household who is 18 or older who can complete the survey. If not apologize, thank them for their time. Ask: “What is the best way for me to get in touch with an adult in your household?” Leave a message or ask for a time to call back to reach an adult or email address.] [If response is yes, verify that they are not driving before you start with the first question] I will be reading the survey questions and response options to you and then will record your responses. Please listen to each question carefully and answer the best you can. May I start with the first question? [If response is no, ask for updated email address or confirm existing email address] Okay, I can send you a link by email. Can you confirm that your email address is [spell out the email address listed for the Respondent]? If respondent has partially completed the survey: Hi, my name is [________], and I’m calling from Brandeis University. We see that you received our pre-notification letter or email and started filling out our survey for the 2017 Greater Naples area Jewish Community Study. I wanted to call to thank you for participating in the survey. Would you like me to email you another link so that it is fresh in your inbox or would you like to complete the rest of the survey over the phone? If unwilling/unable to take the survey at this point: Is there a better time when we could call you? [Be mindful of our calling hour limits. Try to press for a specific time.] Or Can I email you the survey so you can complete it online when you have a chance? 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 139 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1171 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) [To ask for their email address] What’s the best email to reach you? [Read it back to them to confirm it.] Leaving Voice-mail for Participants 1st attempt: “Hi, my name is [______], and I’m calling from Brandeis University [to follow up with you about an e-mail we sent you]. We are conducting a study of Jewish adults that live in the Greater Naples area for at least part of the year, on behalf of the Jewish Federation of Collier County. I’m going to e-mail the survey to you now to the e-mail address we have for you on file. We hope you’ll participate! If you have any questions, or would like to schedule to take the survey over the phone, please call Sarah Harpaz at 781-736-2964 or e-mail us at naples@brandeis.edu, that’s ‘n-a-p-l-e-s@-b-r-a-n-d-e-i-s.e-d-u.’ Thank you and have a great day!” 2nd attempt and beyond: “Hi, my name is [______], and I’m calling from Brandeis University [to follow up with you about an e-mail we sent you]. We are still trying to get in touch with you regarding our study of Jewish adults that live in the Greater Naples area for at least part of the year, on behalf of the Jewish Federation of Collier County. I’m going to e-mail the survey to you again now to the e- mail address we have on file for you . We hope you’ll participate! If you have any questions, or would like to schedule to take the survey over the phone, please call Sarah Harpaz at 781-736- 2964 or e-mail us at naples@brandeis.edu that’s ‘n-a-p-l-e-s@-b-r-a-n-d-e-i-s.e-d-u.’ Thank you and have a great day!” If Unsure Whether Voice-mail Belongs to Respondent: 1st attempt: “Hi, I’m calling from Brandeis University. I’m trying to get in touch with the [HOUSEHOLD NAME] family. I’m calling [to follow up with them about an e-mail] regarding a research study we sent them recently.If you have any questions or if we’ve called this number by mistake, please call Sarah Harpaz at 781-736-2964 or e-mail us at naples@brandeis.edu that’s ‘n-a-p-l-e- s@-b-r-a-n-d-e-i-s.e-d-u.’ Thank you and have a great day!” 2nd attempt and beyond: “Hi, I’m calling from Brandeis University for the [HOUSEHOLD NAME] family. We are still trying to get in touch with them regarding our online research study. We’d be happy to discuss any questions or concerns you may have about our research. If you have any questions or if we’ve called this number by mistake, please call Sarah Harpaz at 781-736-2964 or e-mail us at 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 140 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1172 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) naples@brandeis.edu that’s ‘n-a-p-l-e-s@-b-r-a-n-d-e-i-s.e-d-u’ Thank you and have a great day!” Sending a new link upon request from respondent SPELL OUT E-MAIL BACK TO RESPONDENT. If they ask what the e-mail will be used for, say, “We will use your e-mail only for the purposes of this study. We won’t add you to any mailing list or give your information to any other organization.” The Web Survey If you reach the respondent and they agree to complete the survey with you over the phone, you will need to open the survey through the CATI. The teal arrow points to the calling window that will pop up as soon as you click on “call” on the respondent’s page. At the top right of the calling window is the Open Survey button (green arrow). SKIP THE INTRO PAGE OF THE RESPONDENT SURVEY—it is intended for respondents who complete the survey themselves online. Go through the survey question by question. An ideal interview should sound something like a conversation. Rather than forcing respondents to listen to every choice every time, we’re going to use conversat ional tricks, like pauses, to attempt to elicit answers. If the pause doesn’t elicit an answer, we gently prompt respondents by reading response categories. If a respondent stops you while you are reading the response categories, don’t make him/her listen to them all. DO NOT ASSUME YOU KNOW WHAT A RESPONDENT WOULD ANSWER. If a respondent gives an answer that doesn’t fit into a category, gently try to prompt them into one by first rereading the response categories (“Would that be ‘somewhat agree’ or ‘strongly agree’?”) and, if that fails, say that you understand that the categories do not quite fit, but which one would be the most appropriate. If that doesn’t work, move onto the next question. If a respondent asks what a question means, simply say “whatever it means to you.” For example, we ask, “In the past year, did you do anything to celebrate... [list of holidays]. If the respondent asks what “celebrate” means, say “Whatever you define as celebrate.” If the respondent continues to press, just repeat, “Whatever you define as celebrate.” If you run into technical difficulties (i.e., the survey will not load), ask the participant to wait a moment and inform your supervisor. 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 141 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1173 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Once you’ve completed the survey, make sure to click next on the last page of the survey so the page gets saved. CLOSE THE SURVEY WINDOW/TAB once you’ve finished. You don’t need to close all open windows/tabs—e.g., you can keep the CATI open—but you do need to close the one that begins https://www.cmjssurvey.com/. Getting Cut Off in the Middle of a Survey If a respondent gets cut off in the middle of a survey, e.g., if his/her cell phone has spotty coverage, call back. If he/she does not pick up, leave a voice-mail with Sarah’s contact information. Mark the directive as ‘Call back later’ and explain in the note what happened. If a respondent wants to stop the survey, say, “We only have a few more questions left.” If they insist they’re not going to continue, say “Would you like to come back to the survey at another time?” At the end of a call, click “Next” to ensure that the responses on the current page are saved, and then close the window/tab. If the respondent didn’t want to complete it on the call, do not click through to the end for them. The survey software will remember previous survey answers if/when the respondent returns to the survey. Recording Information in the CATI While you’re on the phone, you need to enter information into the CATI, recording what has happened during your phone call. 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 142 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1174 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Contact Type (Navy Arrow):Choose whether you reached the Respondent- you’ve reached the respondent or a confirmed voice-mail of the respondent. Other- you’ve reached someone else besides the respondent (or the VM of someone else), Examples: (Spouse, roommate, coworker, other family member, or other person who knows the respondent) No Contact- you didn’t reach anyo ne, the phone continuously rang, reached unidentified VM, you reached a completely wrong number, fax machine, etc. Number Is (Blue arrow): Choose what type of number it was that you called. Each contact type will have different number options. Respondent options: respondent Cell, respondent Work, respondent Home (Only select one if you know which type it is. If you do not know, then do not select one). Other options: other, spouse, parent, coworker, don’t know (You MUST select one of these option before moving on). No Contact- you do not select a Number Type If you’re not sure if you’ve reached a Respondent or an Other, then make an educated guess. Call Outcome and Outcome Comment (Green and Orange arrows): Choose an outcome that best summarizes what happened during the phone call. Explain why you chose that outcome and 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 143 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1175 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) what actually happened during the call in the outcome comment box. We want to know what the answering machine said, was the respondent nice, did they mention anything interesting (going on a trip, living with roommates, living with parents, being out of town for a while, etc.), anything else you can think of. The more information, the better! After you save a call outcome, the number you dialed will grey out to let you know that you saved a call outcome already. Each contact type will have different call outcome options. Respondent Call Outcome Options Hard Refusal- If you speak with the respondent and it is clear we should NOT call this number again. Examples of the comments that might go with a respondent hard refusal: x Respondent answered but hung up the phone in the middle of my introduction, I called again and respondent hung up again. Hard Refusal. x Respondent answered and asked to be removed from our e-mail and phone lists. Soft Refusa l- If you speak with the respondent and he/she does not seem interested in taking the survey but also does not refuse to take the survey outright. After being reviewed by a supervisor, we re-assign these cases to our most experienced callers who try to get a different outcome. Example of a comment that might go with a respondent soft refusal: x Reached Steven. He said he was busy at work and hung up. Will Complete Online- You speak with the respondent and he/she says he/she will complete the survey online. If the respondent requests another survey link, send them a regular e-mail, which will include their survey link. Add a short personal message like, “It was great talking to you today.” Example of a comment with Will Complete Online: x Reached respondent who was very friendly and said that she doesn’t have time right now to do the survey but that she has the e-mail link already and will complete the survey later tonight. Left Message with Respondent- If you spoke to the respondent and he/she listened to what you had to say, but didn’t request another survey link and didn’t necessarily confirm that he/she would do the survey online. Example of a comment with a Left Message with Respondent call outcome: x Spoke to respondent, I explained why I was calling, she said she said that she remembered the survey but that she had to go, and then hung up before I could try to schedule a call back. Voice Message on Identified Machine- You leave a voice message on a machine that either you think identifies the respondent (has their first name) or that has previously been determined to belong to the respondent. Example of a comment with a Voice Message on Identified Machine: x Left VM encouraging respondent to do survey, machine says “Sally” in its recording. x Left VM on automated machine for Bobby. Mother had told us that this is the respondent cell number. 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 144 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1176 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Voice Message on ID Machine + e-mail- You leave a voice message on a machine that either you think identifies the respondent (has their first name) or that has previously been determined to belong to the respondent. When this call outcome is selected, you will have to go to the “send e-mail to” box (pink arrow) and select the e-mail addresses that you want your e-mail to be sent to. Select all e-mail addresses that say respondent in parenthesis. You should make sure to also look at the e-mail addresses with (Other) written after them because these may also be for respondents. Use your judgment. For example, if the e-mail address has the respondent’s initials or name in it, then you can e-mail that one too. You will then we asked to select which type of e-mail you would like to send (purple arrow). Your options are: regular e-mail, voice-mail e-mail, or custom e-mail. Each e-mail type has a different text script (that you will not see), so make sure you select the proper type of e-mail. For a voice message on ID machine + e-mail outcome, select the Voicemail E-mail type. Call Back Later- Use this outcome if the respondent requested to be called back at a different time. As soon as you select ‘call back later,’ a calendar will pop up so you can schedule the call (dark red arrow ). You will have to select the day, time, and time zone of the call back. When selecting the time and time zone for the call back, please enter it in according to EST. The call back date and time will print automatically as part of your comment in the call history. So, in the comment box, you should write anything else that happened in the conversation. Try to get the respondent to pick a specific time for the call back, but if respondent won’t, then just pick a time. Examples of comments with Call Back Later: x Spoke with respondent who said to call back tomorrow at noon, lives in California. x Spoke to respondent who was busy at the moment, but wanted to hear more about the survey at another time. She said to call back tomorrow. I asked for a specific time, but she said it doesn’t matter. So I suggested 7:00 tomorrow (Tues) evening. She’s in California, so that’s 4:00 pm her time. She sounded interested and nice, but was just busy. If a respondent requests to be called back later on a different number than the one you are calling right now, then still select “Call Back Later” as your call outcome and schedule the call back on the calendar as usual and say which number the respondent wants to be called back on in your comment. If it is a NEW number that the respondent wants to be called back on, then enter the new number into the Got New Contact Info section (tan arrow). Make sure to select the number type if you know it. In your comment, make sure you say that the call back needs to be made to the new/other number and specify which number that is. Your comment might look like this: x Reached respondent. She was at work, so said to call 5454 number (her home number) tomorrow. Make call back on 5454 number. This call outcome also applies to situations that are more general. For example, if you hear in a VM that the respondent is out of the office until next week, then select a call back time for next week. 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 145 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1177 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) . Other Call Outcome Options Hard Refusal- You speak to a parent or spouse or roommate or whoever and they say that they don’t want to be contacted again. Example comment: x Spoke with father who said “Stop calling me!” and hung up after I said I was calling from Brandeis University and asked to speak with the respondent. Or they hang up on you (and then you call back and they hang up again). Example comment: x Called and said “Hi can I speak with Lauren?” The person said, “This is her mother. Who’s calling?” After I said that I was calling from Brandeis University about the study, the mother hung up. I called back right away and said “Hi. I think we got disconnected. Can I speak with Lauren?” The person hung up on me again. Or if he/she refuses for the respondent (this essentially means they don’t want to be called again). For example, you may hear the Other asking the respondent and the respondent answering in the background. If this particular situation occurs, make sure you select Respondent Hard Refusal as your final directive. Example comment: x Spoke with brother who was conveying everything I was saying to his brother who was in the other room (but I could hear him in the background). Said respondent didn’t want to participate and I heard him say so in the background. 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 146 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1178 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Soft Refusal:The “Other” that you speak with does not seem too interested in listening to you or passing along your message. After being reviewed by a supervisor, we re-assign these cases to our most experienced callers who try to get a different outcome. Example of a comment that might go with an Other soft refusal: x Spoke with roommate who said she didn’t think the respondent would be interested. She hung up before I could try to get better contact information or ask her to pass along our information to the respondent. She didn’t seem very interested in listening. Will Pass Message Along to Respondent: If you spoke to a person who would not give out the respondent’s contact info but was willing to take a message and pass it along to the respondent. Example of a comment with Will Pass Message Along to Respondent: x Spoke with grandparent, he didn’t want to give me respondent’s info, so he agreed to take Dina’s info and tell respondent. Left VM on Confirmed Other Answering Machine: You left a voice mail on an answering machine that is confirmed (either by name in machine message or by previously speaking to Other at this number) to be the Other. Example comment: x Left VM on machine with a message that said “You’ve reached the Cohen residence.” Since the respondent’s last name is Cohen, this is probably the respondent’s parents/home phone number. I left a message saying who we’re looking for, about the study, and Dina’s information. Language Barrier: If you reached a person who you are unable to communicate with (because they don’t speak English or speak English very poorly), then you should use this outcome. Make sure to leave a comment that includes what language the person speaks, if you can tell. Example of comment with this outcome: x Spoke with father who sounded Russian, could not communicate with him, have a Russian speaker call back. Call Back Later: You reached someone other than the respondent, who asked to be called back at another time. As soon as you select ‘call back later’, a calendar will pop up so you can schedule the call. The call back date and time will print automatically as part of your comment in the call history. So, in the comment box, you should write anything else that happened in the conversation. Try to get the Other to pick a specific time for the call back, but if he/she won’t, then just pick a time. Examples of comments with Call Back Later: x Spoke with sister who said she didn’t have time to talk right now, but that she would be able to give us the resp’s info if we call back tomorrow at noon, lives in California. x Spoke with a little kid who said his mom would be back later tonight. So, I’m going to mark this as a call back for 8:00 pm EST. x Reached someone (maybe dad) who didn’t seem to speak English very well (maybe is Russian), but said his son would be back tomorrow to talk, I asked for a time and he said 7:30 pm EST. 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 147 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1179 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) x Spoke to mother who gave the 5656 number for respondent. Mother said that the respondent is on vacation until next weekend, so I made a call back for then at the new number. Another time when you might use the Call Back Later call outcome is if you get a new number and you can’t call it right away because of the time zone of that new number. If this happens, then you should select the Call Back Later outcome for the call and pick the call back date/time for the soonest date/time that new number can be called. For example, let’s say you reach a mother who gives you the cell number for the respondent. The mother lives in California, so you called her at 9:00 PM EST. It is too late to call New York (where the respondent lives- the time zone of the new cell number). So, you should schedule the call back for the next day at 7:00 PM. When scheduling a call back, make sure you always ask what time zone the call back is for (just because it is a 617 number, you cannot assume that the call is in Boston). Sent E-mail: The person you reach either: x Gives you a new e-mail for the respondent. If this happens, you should make sure to enter the new e-mail into the text box under the other e-mail addresses listed. You should also select the regular e-mail type. In the additional message space, you should write a note saying who you got the e-mail from. You might write “Hi Ben, I spoke with your dad today who gave us this e-mail address for you. We hope that you’ll complete this quick survey to help out with our important research study so we can learn about your life in the Collier County community. Thank you!” x If the person you reach, or a voice-mail, verifies an existing e-mail for the respondent. The conversation might go like this: x You: “Hi. Can I speak with Ben?” x Ot her: “He doesn’t live here anymore.” x You: “Do you have a better phone number or e-mail address at which I might reach him?” x Other: “Who is this?” x You: “My name is [_____] and I’m calling from Brandeis University. We are trying to get in touch with Ben regarding a quick survey on Jews living in the Greater Naples area in Florida.” x Other: “Oh, ok. Sure. His e-mail is bencohen@gmail.com” Another way the conversation might go when an Other verifies an existing e-mail we have for the respondent is: x You: “Hi, can I speak with Ben?” x Other: “He doesn’t live here anymore.” x You: “Do you have a better phone number or e-mail address at which I might reach him?” x Other: “Who is this?” 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 148 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1180 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) x You: “My name is [_____] and I’m calling from Brandeis University. We are trying to get in touch with Ben regarding a quick survey on Jews living in the Greater Naples area in Florida.” x Other: “I don’t think I’d like to give you his contact information.” x You: “We have bencohen@gmail.com as an e-mail on file for him. Would you mind letting me know if that’s correct?” x Other: “Yeah, I think it is.” We do not e-mail links to the survey to anyone other than the respondent. DO NOT send regular or voicemail e-mails to others than the respondent. If someone other than the respondent requests that you e-mail them the survey, select customized e-mail under e-mail options, and send them a message explaining the survey and providing our contact information. Say that you are not allowed to send the survey link to anyone other than the respondent, but that the respondent can contact us directly for the link. The conversation might go like this: x You: “Hi. Can I speak with Ben?” x Other: “He doesn’t live here anymore.” x You: “Do you have a better phone number or e-mail address at which I might reach him?” x Other: “Who is this?” x You: “My name is [_____] and I’m calling from Brandeis University. We are trying to get in touch with Ben regarding a quick survey on Jews living in the Greater Naples area in Florida.” 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 149 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1181 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) x Other: “If you send it to me, I will forward it to Ben.” x You: “We can’t send the survey to anyone other than Ben, but I can send you an e -mail with the information Ben needs to know. We would really appreciate it if you could forward that along to him. What’s your e-mail address?” Example: “Hi Mr. Cohen, Thank you so much for speaking with me today and for agreeing to forward our information to Ben. We are conducting a study of Jewish adults that live in the Greater Naples area for at least part of the year, on behalf of the Jewish Federation of Collier County. If Ben has any questions, or would like to schedule to take the survey over the phone, he can call Sarah Harpaz at 781-736- 2964 or e-mail us at naples@brandeis.edu. We hope to hear from Ben soon because his responses are very important to us. Thank you! All the best, [your name]” Gave New Number: The person you reached gave you a new phone number for the respondent and none of the other call outcomes fit. Make sure you record the last four digits of the number is in your comments so that when viewing the call history later, we can see where that new number came from. Also, make sure you enter the new number into the “New Contact Info” sec tion (tan arrow). Next to where you enter the new number is a drop down menu of phone types. Please select a phone type. They are all self-explanatory except for “Other.” “Other” is for when you know who the phone number reaches, but that person is not one of the given options. An example would be if the number reaches the respondent’s roommate (that would be a phone type of “Other”). Of course, make sure you call the new number right away (if time zones permit you). Example comment: x Spoke to mother who didn’t want to take a message, but did give me respondent’s cell number (7462) and said she’s living in Texas now. No/Unknown Contact Call Outcome Options Disconnected: You reached a message that said that the number that is disconnected. Once a number has had a call outcome of ‘Disconnected’ 3 times in a row, write in the comments in capital letters “3 TIMES DISCONNECTED. DO NOT CALL.” Rings Out: You reached a number that rings and rings with no answer or voice-mail/answering machine. Once a number has had a call outcome of ‘Rings out’ 3 times in a row, write in the comments in capital letters “3 TIMES RANG OUT. DO NOT CALL.” Wrong number: A number that reaches someone who does not know the respondent. If you see this call outcome in the call history, no need to call this number again, unless instructed otherwise. If you think there is a reason to try this number again, consult with the supervisor. Busy signal: You reached a number that has a busy signal. Once a number has had a call outcome of ‘Busy Signal’ 3 times in a row, write in the comments in capital letters “3 TIMES BUSY. DO NOT CALL.” Be aware that other countries sometimes have different rings. For 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 150 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1182 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) example, in Israel, it sounds more like a beep than a ring when you call, be sure not to confuse this with a busy signal. Automated Message with New Number: You reached an automated message that provides a new number. The automated message might say something like “The number you’ve reached is no longer in service. The new number is 555-888-3333.” Make sure you enter the new number into the Got New Contact Info section and call the number. Also make sure you record the last four digits of the new number in your call outcome comment for the old number and make it clear that we shouldn’t call the old number anymore, but should call the new number instead. Fax machine: You reached a fax machine; it makes loud high-pitched noises. If you see this call outcome in the call history, no need to call this number again, unless instructed otherwise. If you think there is a reason to try this number again, consult with the supervisor. Left Message at Automated VM: you reach an answering machine that is automated, meaning it is not a person’s voice and you cannot tell who it reaches; you leave a more general message. If it’s the first time you’re calling, you might leave a voice-mail like this “Hi, my name is [______], and I’m calling from Brandeis University. We are trying to reach [respondent] regarding a survey that we are conducting. We’d really appreciate it if they could call us back at 781-736-2964 e-mail us at naples@brandeis.edu. That’s n-a-p-l-e-s@-b-r-a-n-d-e-i-s-.-e-d-u. Thank you!” VM full:You get a message saying something like ‘The voice mail box is full.” Once a number has had this call outcome three times in a row, you should not call this number again and you should write “3 TIMES VM FULL. DO NOT CALL” in your comments. Not Accepting Calls/VM Not set Up:You reached a message that says something like “The person you are trying to reach is not accepting calls at this time” or “The mail box of the person you are trying to reach is not set up at this time.” Once a number has had this call outcome three times in a row, you should mark the case as a “Supervisor Review” and write “three times not taking calls” in your comments. Attempt Number After you finished entering all the information for a phone call, you will click Save. Once you click save, a new attempt number will print with the information you just recorded under the call history of the phone number you just called. Each time you call a phone number, it’s a new attempt (at reaching the respondent). Again, this will print like this: 512-555-5555 1st attempt. Natanya Cohen. Thurs, June 24, 2010. 7:40 pm. No contact. Rings Out. 2nd attempt. Shahar Hecht. Wed, July 7, 20101. 7:57 pm. Respondent Contact. Requested Call Back for July 8, 2010 at 5:00 pm EDT. Spoke with Jonathan and he’s willing to do the survey. I scheduled a call back. 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 151 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1183 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Selecting a Directive (black arrow) After you have completed a case, meaning you have called every phone number that you should and followed through with all e-mails that you should, you MUST select a directive and enter a comment (black arrow). When you write your comment, you should always err on the side of writing too much information in a comment, rather than too little. Your comment is to leave a summary of what happened while you were trying to contact this respondent and why you selected the directive that you did. The directive is what you think should happen to this case next. After you’ve selected the directive and written the comment, click on the “End Attempt” button (sky blue arrow).Then you will be brought back to your calling list. The “start” button (next to the respondent for which you just left a directive) will have disappeared. If, for some reason you need to get back into that case, tell the supervisor. Here are the directive options: Keep in Calling Rotation: Most of the directives that you leave will be “Keep in Calling Rotation.” This directive simply means that the case doesn’t need any special attention and should be called again later on if the respondent doesn’t complete the survey online. Example comments: x Left VM on confirmed respondent cell (2376). 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 152 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1184 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) x Left VM on unknown number (6754), got a busy signal for “parent” number (2427). Supervisor Review: Use this directive if there is something dealing with this respondent and his/her CATI page that you would like a supervisor to review or change. Examples: a time zone is incorrect, you’re not sure if the respondent is eligible or not for our study, something weird happened during your call, etc. You should write in the comments what it is you want to bring the supervisor’s attention to. ***ANY CASE THAT HAS A “SOFT REFUSAL” CALL OUTCOME, NEEDS TO HAVE A SUPERVISOR REVIEW DIRECTIVE*** If you simply have a question, first ask the supervisor that is on duty. x Spoke with respondent who said that she lives in Australia now (so her 5555 number should have a different time zone). She said she is 14 hours ahead of us. x Spoke with resp. at 6754 number. He said he was busy and hung up, so it was a soft refusal. Note that when you are determining that someone has a new time zone, you need to ask how many hours difference (or just what time is it there now) or the name of the city. This is important because there are multiple time zones in one country (e.g., Australia has six different time zones). Respondent Hard Refusal: If you speak with the respondent and it is clear we should NOT call this number again, Sarah will remove them from the mailing lists so that they are not called again. Examples of the comments that might go with a respondent hard refusal: x Respondent answered at 4746 number but hung up the phone in the middle of my introduction, called again and respondent hung up again. Before speaking to respondent, I had spoken with mother who said respondent had a bad experience on Birthright. x Respondent answered at 5008 and asked to be removed from our e-mail and phone lists. Note that you do not use a respondent hard refusal directive if a parent or roommate gives you a refusal. We only stop calling a case overall if the respondent him/herself refuses. Call Back Later: Use this directive if the respondent requested to be called back at a different time (if any of the call outcomes you selected were “Call Back”). The call back time you had selected for the call outcome will automatically become part of your directive comment. The comment you write should be a quick summary of what happened, an explanation of the directive you selected, and anything noteworthy that happened during your phone calls. Examples of comments with “Call Back Later”: x Respondent requested a call back for next week any day besides Thursday. I also spoke with mother who was nice and said that respondent had a good time on Birthright. x Spoke to respondent who was busy at the moment, but wanted to hear more about the survey another time. She said to call back tomorrow. She sounded interested and nice, but was just busy. She also said that she was now living in Germany. Daytime Phone Call: Use this directive if there is a phone number that should be tried during the workday (e.g., a respondent lives out of the country and would be asleep during our regular calling hours, or the only number reaches an office). Do NOT use this directive for specific callback times (e.g., a respondent asked to be called at 2:00 PM the following day). That 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 153 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1185 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) situation should have a “Call back later” directive. Only use the daytime call directive if one of the numbers we have is a number that can only be called during our day. Example of a comment with this directive: x 8109 number reaches an office VM (“You have reached the office of David Cohen…”), call back during office hours to reach David. This seems to be the only direct number, so let’s try it during the day. Language barrier: If there is a phone number that needs to be tried, but the person it reaches is someone that you are unable to communicate (because of a language barrier) with, then you should use this directive. Make sure to leave a comment that includes what language the person speaks, if you can tell. Example of comment with this directive: x Spoke with father at 0649 number, could not communicate with him because he only speaks Russian. Have a Russian speaker call back. Other number reached an automated VM. No good phone numbers: Use this directive if ALL phone numbers are unhelpful (they’re wrong, disconnected, reach a parent who isn’t helpful, etc). Example of a comment with this directive: x Mobile number 8745 is disconnected; home number 5665 is a fax machine, no good phone numbers left. x 6784 reaches the mother who hung up on me twice, 3156 has rang out 3 times in a row, no good numbers left. Worksheet: Examples of Leaving Directives in the CATI 1. 415-555-5555 1st attempt. Viktoria Bedo. June 18, 2015. 715. Other Contact. 4655- reached resp father- said she wasn't home and to call back later in the evening, I said we couldn't call later on Sundays, and asked if she would be available in the evenings on the weekday and he said later evenings. I looked up the 905 area code and it is eastern time Call Outcome: Directive: 512-555-5555 1st attempt. Viktoria Bedo. Thu Aug 11,2015 7:20. Other Contact. Spoke to mother, said she would relay the message but that her daughter (the resp) had told her about the survey and she also confirmed the email on file so i am re-sending it. resp's mother told me the resp. had said she was going to complete it Sent to: abc@abc.com Call Outcome: Directive: 2. 415-555-5555 1st attempt. Viktoria Bedo. Thu Aug 04,2011 9:19. Other Contact. 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 154 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1186 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) I spoke to a woman, possibly the mother, she said the resp was not home, so I asked when was a better time to call back and she didn’t know, wasn’t sure about confirming email addresses but she took down our number to pass along to the resp to call us back. Call Outcome: Directive: 415-555-5555 1st attempt. Viktoria Bedo. Thu Aug 04,2011 9:19. Respondent contact. reached respondent on his cell phone. Seamed unsure about wanting to do the survey, but after some prompting said that he would check it out online. Call Outcome: Directive: 3. 512-555-5555 1st attempt. Viktoria Bedo Thu Sep 01,2011 7:44. Respondent contact. Talked to the resp at 2057. He said that he has received our emails. He asked me how much is the gift card for, and when I said 15 he said "Meeeh. I don't have the time for that. I am going to pass, but thanks" Call Outcome: Directive: 4. 405-555-5555 4th attempt . Viktoria Bedo. Wed Sep 07,2011 8:21. Respondent Contact. Spoke with resp. at 3255 number. He said he completed the survey and sent it in. I apologized for calling again and explained that our information said he had only completed half of it. But he says he completed the whole thing. Call Outcome: Directive: 3rd attempt . Viktoria Bedo. Wed Aug 31,2011 8:38. Respondent Contact. reached resp at HOME at 3255. He said that the hotmail account was no good, and provided the walla.co.il account. Sent email Call Outcome: Directive: 5. 613-555-5555. 2nd attempt. Dina Bleckmab. Mon Sep 05,2011 8:26. Respondent contact. (5196) Spoke with resp. He said he will complete the survey if he has the time but that he cannot make any promises. He seemed very upset that we keep calling him. I told him that the survey will be closing at the end of this week and that I hope he participates. He then said thank you and that he had to go and then hung up Call Outcome: Directive: 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 155 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1187 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) 6. 905-555-5555. 1st attempt. Viktoria Bedo Tue Aug 02,2011 7:31. Other Contact. Woman speaking on VM greeting "Hi, we're not available to take your call, but leave your number and we'll get back to you. Left message. Call Outcome: Directive: 902-555-5555. 1st attempt. Viktoria Bedo Tue Aug 02, 2011 8:37. No contact/unknown contact. A woman picked up and said I had a wrong number. Call Outcome: Directive: 905-555-5555. 1st attempt. Viktoria Bedo. Tue 02,2011 7:46. Respondent contact the greeting said " I have reached the [redacted] family" I left a message for our resp, saying that "this message was for Daniel and that we need to contact him regarding a survey " Didn't send an email to the address on file because the email is for another person "Jonathan", it ’s probably the father. Call Outcome: Directive: 7. 905-555-5555. 3rd attempt. Viktoria Bedo. Thu Aug. 20,2011 8:30. Other Contact. I talked to the respondent’s father who gave me a new email address (abc@gmail.com) to reach the respondent, who is currently living in Israel. Sent to: abc@gmail.com Call Outcome: Directive: When Things Go Wrong People may be upset that we’re calling them, upset that their name is on a list, or during the survey they may become upset by certain questions about sensitive topics. Be sympathetic. If they had a bad experience in their community, let them know that this survey is the perfect place for them to make their feelings known. If they are upset with the Jewish community, a particular community leader, or don’t consider themselves “Jewish enough” – tell them that we want to hear from everybody, and that if they’re willing to share their experiences, we would appreciate hearing about them. If a respondent won’t do the survey, thank them very much for their time and hang up. If someone asks to speak with the supervisor, that’s OK. Tell them “One moment please” and find the supervisor. People may be abusive. If this happens, simply say “Thank you very much for your time” and 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 156 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1188 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) hang up. You don’t need to wait for a pause in the tirade. Use the “Hard refusal” disposition in the CATI and leave a comment explaining the situation. Then go tell the supervisor this happened. If you need to take a break after a bad call, that’s OK. You can also send an email to Sarah or Breanna if you want to talk about it with them. If the Respondent is Screened Out (Ineligible for the Survey) If the respondent answers “no” to the first question, make sure that they are certain of this answer. If they are, tell them “Sorry to bother you, unfortunately you are not eligible for our survey. Thank you for your time.” They are ineligible for the survey. Mark “no” and then click “Next” before you close their survey. If the respondent answers “Yes” but then answers “No” to both the question asking whether they are Jewish, and the question asking whether someone in the household is Jewish, again: make sure this information is correct. Once they are screened out this cannot be undone. If they’re certain no one in the household is eligible, te ll them the same thing: “Sorry to bother you, unfortunately you are not eligible for our survey. Thank you for your time.” Mark their answers. If they don’t tell you their ZIP code, put 99999 so we know it’s not an eligible participant, then click “Next” before you close their survey. 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 157 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1189 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Pre-Notification Letter February 3, 2017 The [LastName] household [Address1] [Address2] [City], [State] [Zip] Dear [LastName] household, Your household is invited to participate in a survey of the Greater Naples Jewish community. The survey is intended to help local Jewish organizations assess the needs and interests of Jews throughout the region. It is being conducted on behalf of the Jewish Federation of Collier County by the Cohen Center for Modern Jewish Studies at Brandeis University. Over the next several weeks, you may receive a phone call from Brandeis University about the study. If you receive a call, please answer! This survey is very important and we need to hear from people just like you. The survey is completely voluntary; however, its usefulness is dependent on honest answers and participation from members of the community. You will not be asked to donate money and your information will remain confidential. The survey will take about 25-30 minutes to complete. You must be at least 18 years old to participate. To complete the survey online, visit the following link and enter your access code: http://bit.ly/NJCstudy Access Code: [TOKEN] If you have any questions about the survey or would like to have the survey link emailed to you or schedule a time to complete the survey over the phone, please call the research team at Brandeis at 781-736-2964 or email us at naples@brandeis.edu. To be in touch in with the Jewish Federation of Collier County, contact Jeffrey Feld at 239-263-4205 or by email at JFeld@jewishnaples.org. For background information about how the Cohen Center conducts community studies, please visit our website, http://bit.ly/cmjsstudy. You may also contact the Brandeis Committee for the Protection of Human Subjects (781-736-8133, irb@brandeis.edu). This committee works to safeguard the interests of individuals who participate in Brandeis- sponsored research. Results from the study will be available at the end of the year. We would like to thank you in advance for your participation in this important research. Sincerely, Matthew Boxer, PhD Assistant Research Professor, Cohen Center for Modern Jewish Studies 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 158 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1190 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Briefing Materials for Interviewers Briefing Materials for 2017 Greater Naples Community Study The contents of this file will help callers and supervisors for the 2017 Greater Naples Jewish Community Study better understand the questions on the survey and respondents’ answers. If you have any questions that are not addressed by the material in this file, please contact the Cohen Center for clarification. Matthew Boxer, Principal Investigator Janet Aronson, Project Manager Tel: (781) 736-3968 Tel: (781) 736-2348 Email: mboxer@brandeis.edu Email: jaronson@brandeis.edu Cohen Center for Modern Jewish Studies Brandeis University, MS 014 415 South Street Waltham, MA 02454-9110 Web: www.brandeis.edu/cmjs naples@brandeis.edu Brandeis University Maurice and Marilyn Cohen Center Mailstop 014 TEL: 781-736-2060 for Modern Jewish Studies 415 South Street FAX : 781-736-3929 Waltham, Massachusetts Leonard Saxe, Ph. D., 02454-9110 Director 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 159 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1191 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Jewish Holidays Cheat Sheet Chanukah/Hanukkah (Ha-noo-ka or Kha-noo-ka): Festival of Lights, usually celebrated in December. (Traditions: Lighting a menorah; eating jelly donuts and latkes; playing with dreidels.) High Holidays: Also sometimes referred to as the “High Holy Days.” Refers to Rosh Hashanah and Yom Kippur (both defined below). Lag Ba’Omer (Lahg bah-oh-mair): 33rd day of a seven-week period beginning on the second day of Passover and ending the day before Shavuot (both of which are defined below). Traditionally marks the end date of a plague that killed all but five of 24,000 students of a leading rabbi of the first and second centuries CE. Referred to as Lag La’Omer by Sephardic Jews. (Traditions: bonfires, carnivals, haircuts, weddings.) Passover (In Hebrew: Pay-sakh): Celebrating the Israelites’ exodus from Egypt in Biblical times. (Traditions: Holding/attending seders [say-dair – ritual meals and Exodus story retellings]; eating matzah.) Observed in the spring. Purim (Poo-rim or Poo-reem): Celebrating the foiling of a plot to kill the Jews of Persia. (Traditions: dressing in costumes; throwing parties; reading the Book of Esther.) Observed in the early spring. Rosh Hashanah (Rosh Ha-sha-na – many possible pronunciations): The Jewish New Year, celebrated in the early fall. (Traditions: Blowing the shofar [ram’s horn]; eating apples and honey.) Shavuot (Sha-voo-oat or Shuh-voo-iss): Festival of Weeks, celebrating the Israelites receiving of the Torah at Mt. Sinai. (Traditions: Eating cheesecake; staying up all night to learn Jewish texts.) Observed in the late spring/early summer. Simchat Torah (Sim-khaht Toe-rah or Sim-khas Toe-rah): Often thought of as the last day of Sukkot; ending/beginning of Torah reading cycle. (Traditions: Dancing with Torah scrolls; large- scale celebration.) Sukkot (Soo-kote or Suhk-iss): Festival of Booths, celebrated in the fall. Commemorates dwellings of Israelites during 40 years of wandering in the desert. (Traditions: Building/eating in huts or booths.) Tisha B’Av (Ti-shah bi-Ahv or Ti-shah bi’Ahv): Day of mourning commemorating the destruction of the First and Second Temples in Jerusalem. Tu B’Shevat (Too Bee-shvaht): Holiday of trees, celebrated sometime in mid-winter. (Traditions: Planting trees; eating nuts, dates, figs.) 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 160 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1192 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Yom Ha’Atzmaut (Yome Ha-atz-ma-oot): Israel Independence Day, celebrated in the spring. (Traditions: Israel parades; Israel-themed parties.) Yom Ha’Shoah (Yome Ha-sho-ah): Holocaust Remembrance Day, in memory of the 6 million Jews murdered during the Holocaust. Observed in the spring (April/May). Yom Kippur (Yome Key-poor or Yome Kipper): Day of Atonement, celebrated in fall. (Traditions: 25 hours of fasting and prayer.) 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 161 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1193 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Hebrew/Yiddish Words Cheat Sheet Ashkenazi (Ahsh-ke-nah-zee): Refers to Jews of Eastern and Central European descent. (See also Mizrahi and Sephardi.) Bar Mitzvah or Bat/Bas Mitzvah (Bar Mitts-vah; Bot/Bahs Mitts-vah): Age at which a Jewish child is regarded as an adult under Jewish religious law. Boys have a Bar Mitzvah (literally “son of the commandments”), traditionally at age 13; girls have a Bat Mitzvah (literally “daughter of the commandments”), traditionally at age 12. Does not require a ceremony or celebration to mark the event, but in contemporary practice often has one. Bima (Bee-mah): Generally a raised platform or stage in a synagogue from which prayers are led and the Torah is read. Brit Milah/Bris (Breet Mee-lah/Bris): A Jewish circumcision that occurs when the baby boy is 8 days old. Chabad (Kha-bod): A Jewish movement that is particularly active near college campuses. Known for outreach to non-religious Jews. Sometimes known as Lubavitch after the village of its origin in Western Russia. Challah (Kha-lah or kha-lah): Braided loaf of bread traditionally eaten during Shabbat and holiday meals. Chametz (khuh-mitz or kha-metz): Leavened foods that Jews are traditionally forbidden to consume or even own during Passover. Charoset (kha-row-set): A traditional food eaten during Passover, traditionally made of either apples, walnuts, spices, and wine (in Ashkenazic families) or dates, apricots, raisins, almonds or pistachios, and wine (in Sephardic families). Chasidic/Hasidic (Kha-sid-ick): Refers to any of a variety of forms of Orthodox Judaism that promotes spirituality through the internalization of Jewish mysticism. Chabad is the most widely recognized form of Chasidism today. Chavurah/Havurah (Kha-voo-rah):A lay-organized Jewish prayer community. A havurah may not have an official building or rabbi, but will meet regularly for prayer. Haggadah (huh-guh-duh): A book read during the seder (see below) to tell the story of Passover. Kaddish (Kah-dish): Jewish prayer for the dead Kehilla (Keh-hee-lah): Hebrew word for congregation or community Kiddush (Kee-doosh or kih-dish): Jewish prayer over wine recited at the beginning of Shabbat and holidays, as well as at some special events (e.g., weddings) 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 162 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1194 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Ma’ariv (Mah-ah-reev): Evening prayers. Matzah (mots-uh or mots-ah): Unleavened bread. Traditionally eaten throughout Passover, though many Jews also eat it during the year. Mezuzah (Meh-zoo-zah or meh-zoo-zah): An encased scroll of parchment put on the doorway of a Jewish home. Mincha (Min-khah): Afternoon prayers. Minyan (Meen-yahn or like minion): A Jewish prayer quorum needed to conduct services. Mizrahi (Miz-rah -khee): Refers to Jews of Middle Eastern descent. (See also Ashkenazi and Sephardi.) Seder (seh-dehr or say-der): Ritual meal on the first night (and, outside of Israel, traditionally also on the second night) of Passover, during which the story of Passover is told. Sephardi (Seh-far-dee): Refers to Jews of Spanish descent. (See also Ashkenazi and Mizrahi.) Shabbat (Shah-bot): Sabbath. Begins Friday night at sundown and ends Saturday night at sundown. Traditionally a day of rest. Many respondents may use the Yiddish pronunciation, Shah-biss. Shaharit (Shah-hah-reet): Morning prayers. Shaliach (Shah-lee-akh): Hebrew word for emissary, refers to an Israeli sent to live among a local Jewish community as a representative of Israel. Shivah (Shi-vah):A seven-day period of mourning observed by the loved one’s family. Friends and neighbors will bring over food and comfort the family during the week. Shtetl (Shteh-tull): Typically refers to a small town with a large Jewish population in Eastern or Central Europe in the 19th and 20th centuries before World War II. In popular usage, may refer to a neighborhood with a disproportionate Jewish population. (Classic example: Fiddler on the Roof.) Shul (Shool): Refers to a Jewish congregation, usually a synagogue. Siddur (See-duer or sih-derr): A Jewish prayer book. Tallit (Tah-leet or tah-liss): A Jewish prayer shawl, traditionally worn by men during certain prayers. In recent years, some women have begun wearing them too. 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 163 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1195 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Talmud (Tall-mood): Central text of rabbinic Judaism, over 6,000 pages in length, containing teachings and opinions of thousands of rabbis on a wide variety of topics. Tikkun olam (Tee-koon oh-lahm): Literally, repairing the world. Refers to shared sense of ethical responsibility to build a model society in which everyone is treated fairly and everyone’s needs are met. Torah (Toe-rah or toe-rah ): Foundational text of Judaism; occasionally referred to in English as the Pentateuch or the Five Books of Moses. Tzedakah (Tseh-duh-kuh or ts-dah-kah): Literally means justice or righteousness, but most commonly used to refer to charity. More generally, the religious obligation to conduct oneself according to norms of justice and propriety. Yahrzeit (Yar-tzite): Anniversary of the death of a close relative (parent, sibling, spouse, or child). Literally means “time of year.” Often marked by lighting a special candle that burns all day and recitation of Kaddish in memory of the deceased. Yeshiva (Yeh-shee-vah): An intensive academy of Jewish learning, typically deeply religious in orientation, that focuses primarily on traditional religious texts such as the Torah and Talmud. Plural form is yeshivot (yeh-shee-vote). 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 164 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1196 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Branches of Judaism There is one section of the survey where respondents will be asked to identify themselves or members of their household with a “branch” of Judaism. Branches are denominational movements; membership in one movement or another typically suggests a certain level of religiosity, though there is also wide variation within movements. The main movements are referred to as: - Orthodox -Conservative - Reconstructionist -Reform Of these, adherents to Orthodox Judaism tend to be most religiously conservative, while Reconstructionist and Reform Jews tend to be more progressive. (Note that Conservative Judaism should not be confused with political conservatism; many Conservative Jews are politically liberal.) In addition to these movements, there are several other common responses given by respondents on Jewish surveys when asked about affiliation with a branch of Judaism: - Humanistic: a nontheistic movement that defines Judaism in terms of culture and history - Renewal: difficult to describe, but has origins in countercultural movements late 1960s and 1970s - Secular/culturally Jewish: These respondents may prefer to identify as secular or cultural Jews rather than identifying with one of the main movements, which have more religious connotations. - Just Jewish: Many respondents prefer not to identify with any given denomination or movement, saying instead that they are “just Jewish.” Respondents may decide that none of these options fit them and provide a different response. For these respondents, type their response in the text box next to “Other.” Common “other” entries for this question include post-denominational, traditional, modern Orthodox, Chabad, and Conservadox (i.e., a combination of Conservative and Orthodox). 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 165 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1197 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) General Jewish Communal Phrases and Organizations AIPAC (Ay-pack): The American Israel Public Affairs Committee. A lobbying group that advocates pro-Israel policies to the US government. Antisemitism: Prejudice, hatred of, or discrimination against Jews, individually or as a group, based on their Jewish national, ethnic, religious, or racial identity. BDS: “Boycott, Divest, Sanction” – a movement dedicated toward applying economic pressure against the State of Israel to end its occupation of the West Bank and improve conditions for Palestinians. Prominent only in last several years. Often perceived as antisemitic. Day school: Similar to Catholic school, a full-day program attended by Jewish children instead of public school in which students learn both secular subjects (e.g., English, math, science, social studies, etc.) and Jewish subjects (e.g., Hebrew, Jewish history, theology, etc.). There is no Jewish day school in Greater Naples, but some families may send their children to board at yeshivot in other places. Hadassah (Huh-dah-suh):The Women’s Zionist Organization of America. Volunteer organization that promotes ties to Israel. Best known as a leading supporter of medical research. Hillel (Hill-el): Shorthand for Hillel: The Foundation for Jewish Campus Life. Largest Jewish college campus-based organization in the world, serving over 550 colleges and universities throughout the world but primarily in North America. Hebrew school: Supplementary Jewish educational program attended by children between one and four times a week, generally after school or on weekends, in order to teach them about Jewish religious life, culture, and history. Sometimes referred to as “supplementary school,” “Sunday school,” or “religious school.” J Street: An advocacy group that describes itself as left-wing, pro-Israel, and in favour of a peaceful settlement of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Its collegiate arm is known as J Street U. Jewish National Fund: JNF. A charitable Zionist organization that primarily manages significant land holdings and large infrastructure projects in Israel. Jewish War Veterans: An organization of Jewish veterans who served in the US armed forces during times of war. The local post in Naples is Post 202. ORT (pronounced as a word, rhymes with “sort”): A global Jewish charity that primarily funds educational programs, vocational training, and social development for Jews and non-Jews around the world. PJ Library: Organization that mails Jewish children’s books and music each month to families across the country. 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 166 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1198 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Taglit-Birthright Israel (Tahg-leet): A program that provides a free ten-day educational tour of Israel for qualified, self-identified Jewish young adults between the ages of 18 and 26. Largest Jewish educational program in the world; over 350,000 participants since 1999. Three pillars of Judaism: A reference, generally from more religious Jews, to a section of the Talmud that says the world rests on three things: Torah study, ritual observance, and acts of kindness. Zionism: National political movement of the Jewish people in support of a Jewish national homeland in the Land of Israel. Zionist Organization of America: ZOA. A prominent American pro-Israel advocacy group and primary representative of American Jews to the World Zionist Organization. 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 167 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1199 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Naples Jewish Community Organizations Cheat Sheet B’nai B’rith (Ben- ay Brith):Literally “Children of the Covenant,” the oldest Jewish service organization in the world. Core commitments are security and continuity of the Jewish people and the State of Israel and combating antisemitism and other forms of bigotry. B’nai B’rith Youth Organization (BBYO) is the local Jewish youth group for high school students in Naples, sometimes also referred to as AZA or BBG. Children in middle school have an affiliated group known as the Middle School Program. Holocaust Museum and Education Center of Southwest Florida: JCRC: Jewish Community Relations Council. A division of the Jewish Federation of Collier County that promotes and enhances the relationship between the organized Jewish community and the broader community in Greater Naples and advocates for issues of Jewish communal interest. Jewish Family and Community Services of Southwest Florida: Also known as JFCS. A private, non-profit social service organization serving members of both the Jewish community and the wider community in the Greater Naples area. Jewish Federation of Collier County: Also known as the Federation. The central organizational body in the Jewish community. They manage the funding of many of the Jewish organizations in the area and are the funder of this study. MCA:Men’s Cultural Alliance. An affinity group of men in the Greater Naples Jewish community that organizes a wide variety of social, intellectual, and cultural activities. Part of the Jewish Federation of Collier County. WCA:Women’s Cultural Alliance. An affinity group of women in the Greater Naples Jewish community that organizes a wide variety of social, intellectual, and cultural activities. Part of the Jewish Federation of Collier County. 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 168 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1200 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) List of Naples Area Jewish Congregations Please note that this may not be an exhaustive list but rather the list of congregations we expect respondents are most likely to identify as congregations of which they are members in the Greater Naples area. Each congregation is identified by the denomination with which it is affiliated, but each is also open to individuals and households of other denominations. Beth Tikvah (Tick-vuh)– Conservative denomination Chabad Naples Jewish Community Center – Orthodox, but reaches out to all denominations and levels of observance Humanistic Jewish Chavurah – Humanistic Jewish Congregation of Marco Island – Reform Naples Jewish Congregation – Reform Temple Shalom – Reform 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 169 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1201 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Additional Resources The links on this page are provided for anyone who wishes to learn more about this study or related research. 1)A Portrait of Jewish Americans: Findings from a Pew Research Center Survey of U.S. Jews (2013), http://www.pewforum.org/files/2013/10/jewish-american-full-report-for- web.pdf The most recent large scale, nationally representative study of the US Jewish population; several Cohen Center researchers advised the Pew Research Center on the methodology and instrument. 2)The 2015 Greater Nashville Jewish Community Study (2016), http://www.brandeis.edu/ssri/pdfs/NashvilleCommStudy2015.pdf A recent Jewish community study conducted by the Cohen Center. Illustrates the kind of analysis we will do with the data collected for this study. 3) Judaism 101, http://www.jewfaq.org/index.shtml An online encyclopedia of Judaism, primarily from an Orthodox viewpoint. 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 170 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1202 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Appendix D: Maps 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 171 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1203 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Dot Density Map of Jewish Households in the Greater Naples AreaLegend1–Jewish Federation of CollierCounty, Humanistic JewishChavurah2–Holocaust Museum andEducation Center ofSouthwest Florida3–Jewish Family andCommunity Services ofSouthwest Florida4–Beth Tikvah of Naples5–Chabad of Naples JewishCommunity Center6–Jewish Congregation ofMarco Island7–Naples Jewish Congregation8–Temple Shalom• = 20 households2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices1729.A.7.ePacket Pg. 1204Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Dot Density Map of Length of Jewish Households’ Residence in the Greater Naples AreaLegend1–Jewish Federation of CollierCounty, Humanistic JewishChavurah2–Holocaust Museum andEducation Center ofSouthwest Florida3–Jewish Family andCommunity Services ofSouthwest Florida4–Beth Tikvah of Naples5–Chabad of Naples JewishCommunity Center6–Jewish Congregation ofMarco Island7–Naples Jewish Congregation8–Temple Shalom• = 20 households living in the Greater Naples area 10 years or more•= 20 households living in the Greater Naples area fewer than 10 years2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices1739.A.7.ePacket Pg. 1205Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Dot Density Map of Length of Seasonal and Year-Round Residents in the Greater Naples AreaLegend1–Jewish Federation of CollierCounty, Humanistic JewishChavurah2–Holocaust Museum andEducation Center ofSouthwest Florida3–Jewish Family andCommunity Services ofSouthwest Florida4–Beth Tikvah of Naples5–Chabad of Naples JewishCommunity Center6–Jewish Congregation ofMarco Island7–Naples Jewish Congregation8–Temple Shalom• = 20 seasonal households, primary residence•= 20 seasonal households, secondary residence•= 20 year-round households2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices1749.A.7.ePacket Pg. 1206Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Dot Density Map of Households With and Without Children in the Greater Naples AreaLegend1–Jewish Federation of CollierCounty, Humanistic JewishChavurah2–Holocaust Museum andEducation Center ofSouthwest Florida3–Jewish Family andCommunity Services ofSouthwest Florida4–Beth Tikvah of Naples5–Chabad of Naples JewishCommunity Center6–Jewish Congregation ofMarco Island7–Naples Jewish Congregation8–Temple Shalom• = 20 households without children•= 20 households with children2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices1759.A.7.ePacket Pg. 1207Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Dot Density Map of Members of Collier County Congregations in the Greater Naples AreaLegend1–Jewish Federation of CollierCounty, Humanistic JewishChavurah2–Holocaust Museum andEducation Center ofSouthwest Florida3–Jewish Family andCommunity Services ofSouthwest Florida4–Beth Tikvah of Naples5–Chabad of Naples JewishCommunity Center6–Jewish Congregation ofMarco Island7–Naples Jewish Congregation8–Temple Shalom• = 20 households, not members of Collier County congregations•= 20 households, members of Collier County congregations2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices1769.A.7.ePacket Pg. 1208Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Dot Density Map of MCA/WCA Member Households in the Greater Naples AreaLegend1–Jewish Federation of CollierCounty, Humanistic JewishChavurah2–Holocaust Museum andEducation Center ofSouthwest Florida3–Jewish Family andCommunity Services ofSouthwest Florida4–Beth Tikvah of Naples5–Chabad of Naples JewishCommunity Center6–Jewish Congregation ofMarco Island7–Naples Jewish Congregation8–Temple Shalom• = 20 households, not members of MCA/WCA•= 20 households, members of MCA/WCA2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices1779.A.7.ePacket Pg. 1209Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Dot Density Map of Highly Involved Respondents in the Greater Naples AreaLegend1–Jewish Federation of CollierCounty, Humanistic JewishChavurah2–Holocaust Museum andEducation Center ofSouthwest Florida3–Jewish Family andCommunity Services ofSouthwest Florida4–Beth Tikvah of Naples5–Chabad of Naples JewishCommunity Center6–Jewish Congregation ofMarco Island7–Naples Jewish Congregation8–Temple Shalom• = 20 households, moderate, low, or no involvement levels•= 20 households, high involvement level2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices1789.A.7.ePacket Pg. 1210Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Dot Density Map of Uninvolved Respondents in the Greater Naples AreaLegend1–Jewish Federation of CollierCounty, Humanistic JewishChavurah2–Holocaust Museum andEducation Center ofSouthwest Florida3–Jewish Family andCommunity Services ofSouthwest Florida4–Beth Tikvah of Naples5–Chabad of Naples JewishCommunity Center6–Jewish Congregation ofMarco Island7–Naples Jewish Congregation8–Temple Shalom• = 20 households, high, moderate, or low involvement levels•= 20 households, no formal involvement level2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices1799.A.7.ePacket Pg. 1211Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Appendix E: Comparison Charts 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 180 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1212 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Explanation of Comparison Chart The following series of tables provides detailed data about community characteristics for reference. In each section, key characteristics are reported for the overall population on the top row, as well as for subgroups of the population, with each appearing in a row below. All rows are identical throughout the document. Each column reports on one of the variables of interest, showing the proportion of adult Jews or Jewish households (depending upon the question) who fall into the category indicated. In some cases, a complementary column is elided for the sake of saving space (i.e., males are shown, but not females). Where areas of the document are solid black, the question was not applicable for the particular subgroup indicated by the row header. Where areas are colored light gray and numbers appear, there is a statistically significant difference between the subgroups. Selected subgroups are defined as follows: Overall: all Jewish adults or all Jewish households Involvement: See the following page for detailed description of the Involvement categories. Marriage Status: For respondent-level variables, Unmarried are respondents who are not living with a spouse, fiancé/e, or significant other. Inmarried are Jewish respondents living with a Jewish spouse, fiancé/e, or significant other. Intermarried are Jewish respondents living with a non-Jewish spouse, fiancé/e, or significant other. For household-level variables, Unmarried are households with no coupled individual. Inmarried are households containing two Jews in a romantic relationship. Intermarried are households containing a Jew and non-Jew in a romantic relationship. Residence Status: Year-round are households who do not have a second home. Seasonal, Primary are households who also have at least one residence aside from their Naples-area home, and who say that the Naples-area home is their primary residence. Seasonal, Secondary have at least one residence aside from their Naples-area home, but who say that the Naples-area home is not their primary residence. Length of Residence: Jewish respondents who have lived in the area for fewer than 10 years and those who have lived in the area for 10 or more years. Synagogue Membership: Synagogue member households belong to a Jewish congregation, either in Greater Naples or elsewhere. Non-members do not. MCA/WCA Membership: Member households contain an individual who belongs either to the Men’s Cultural Alliance o r the Women’s Cultural Alliance of the Jewish Federation of Collier County. 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 181 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1213 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Involvement variable The involvement variable divides Jewish households into four categories based on their level of involvement in the local Jewish community across three key dimensions: organizational membership, organizational participation, and prosocial behavior. 1.Membership: Respondents were asked if they were members of the six Collier County synagogues or any other synagogue in the area; if they were members of other organizations in Greater Naples; if they were members of informal Jewish groups based in Greater Naples; and if they belonged to the Men’s Cultural Alliance or Women’s Cultural Alliance. Each membership type was scored as 0 (non-members) or 1 (members), and then added together. Scores of 0 were coded as “no” organizational involvement, scores of 1 were coded as “low” organizational involvement, scores of 2 were coded as “moderate” organizational involvement, and scores of 3 and 4 were coded as “high” organizational involvement. 2.Participation: Respondents were asked how frequently they engaged in a variety of activities connected to local Jewish organizations and programs: participating in programs, reading materials, or paying dues. For participation in programs and reading materials, respondents were asked to indicate if they did each activity less than monthly or at least monthly, if at all. Responses of never were coded as 0, less than monthly were coded as 1, and at least monthly were coded as 2. Dues paying was coded as 2. All scores from participation types were added together. Overall scores of 0 were coded as no participation, 1 and 2 were coded as “low” participation, 3 and 4 coded as “moderate” participation, and 5 and 6 coded as “high” participation. 3.Prosocial Behavior: Respondents were asked if they had volunteered for or through local Jewish organizations, and if they made any charitable donations (other than membership dues) to local Jewish organizations in the past year. For the two types of volunteering, the respondent’s higher frequency of participation was used. Responses of never were coded as 0, less than monthly were coded as 1, and at least monthly were coded as 2. Donations to local Jewish organizations were coded as 1. All scores from volunteering or donating were added together. Scores of 0 were coded as no prosocial involvement, scores of 1 were coded as “low” prosocial involvement, scores of 2 were coded as “moderate” prosocial involvement, and scores of 3 were coded as “high” prosocial involvement. An index was constructed from these three forms of involvement in the Jewish community. For each form of involvement, respondents who scored “low” were given one point, those who scored “moderate” were given two points, and those who scored “high” were given three points—and those who did not score in a dimension were given zero points. When scores across each form of involvement were added up, respondents could have scores between zero and nine points. Respondents with an index score of 0 were coded as having no formal involvement in the local organized Jewish community; scores of 1, 2, and 3 were coded as having low involvement; scores of 4, 5, and 6 were coded as having moderate involvement; and scores of 7, 8, and 9 were coded as high involvement. 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 182 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1214 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Explanation of Comparison Chart The following series of tables provides detailed data about community characteristics for reference. In each section, key characteristics are reported for the overall population on the top row, as well as for subgroups of the population, with each appearing in a row below. All rows are identical throughout the document. Each column reports on one of the variables of interest, showing the proportion of adult Jews or Jewish households (depending upon the question) who fall into the category indicated. In some cases, a complementary column is elided for the sake of saving space (i.e., males are shown, but not females). Where areas of the document are solid black, the question was not applicable for the particular subgroup indicated by the row header. Where areas are colored light gray and numbers appear, there is a statistically significant difference between the subgroups. Selected subgroups are defined as follows: Overall: all Jewish adults or all Jewish households Involvement: See the following page for detailed description of the Involvement categories. Marriage Status: For respondent-level variables, Unmarried are respondents who are not living with a spouse, fiancé/e, or significant other. Inmarried are Jewish respondents living with a Jewish spouse, fiancé/e, or significant other. Intermarried are Jewish respondents living with a non-Jewish spouse, fiancé/e, or significant other. For household-level variables, Unmarried are households with no coupled individual. Inmarried are households containing two Jews in a romantic relationship. Intermarried are households containing a Jew and non-Jew in a romantic relationship. Residence Status: Year-round are households who do not have a second home. Seasonal, Primary are households who also have at least one residence aside from their Naples-area home, and who say that the Naples-area home is their primary residence. Seasonal, Secondary have at least one residence aside from their Naples-area home, but who say that the Naples-area home is not their primary residence. Length of Residence: Jewish respondents who have lived in the area for fewer than 10 years and those who have lived in the area for 10 or more years. Synagogue Membership: Synagogue member households belong to a Jewish congregation, either in Greater Naples or elsewhere. Non-members do not. MCA/WCA Membership: Member households contain an individual who belongs either to the Men’s Cultural Alliance or the Women’s Cultural Alliance of the Jewish Federation of Collier County. 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 183 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1215 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Involvement variable The involvement variable divides Jewish households into four categories based on their level of involvement in the local Jewish community across three key dimensions: organizational membership, organizational participation, and prosocial behavior. 1.Membership: Respondents were asked if they were members of the six Collier County synagogues or any other synagogue in the area; if they were members of other organizations in Greater Naples; if they were members of informal Jewish groups based in Greater Naples; and if they belonged to the Men’s Cultural Alliance or Women’s Cultural Alliance. Each membership type was scored as 0 (non-members) or 1 (members), and then added together. Scores of 0 were coded as “no” organizational involvement, scores of 1 were coded as “low” organizational involvement, scores of 2 were coded as “moderate” organizational involvement, and scores of 3 and 4 were coded as “high” organizational involvement. 2.Participation: Respondents were asked how frequently they engaged in a variety of activities connected to local Jewish organizations and programs: participating in programs, reading materials, or paying dues. For participation in programs and reading materials, respondents were asked to indicate if they did each activity less than monthly or at least monthly, if at all. Responses of never were coded as 0, less than monthly were coded as 1, and at least monthly were coded as 2. Dues paying was coded as 2. All scores from participation types were added together. Overall scores of 0 were coded as no participation, 1 and 2 were coded as “low” participation, 3 and 4 coded as “moderate” participation, and 5 and 6 coded as “high” participation. 3.Prosocial Behavior: Respondents were asked if they had volunteered for or through local Jewish organizations, and if they made any charitable donations (other than membership dues) to local Jewish organizations in the past year. For the two types of volunteering, the respondent’s higher frequency of participation was used. Responses of never were coded as 0, less than monthly were coded as 1, and at least monthly were coded as 2. Donations to local Jewish organizations were coded as 1. All scores from volunteering or donating were added together. Scores of 0 were coded as no prosocial involvement, scores of 1 were coded as “low” prosocial involvement, scores of 2 were coded as “moderate” prosocial involvement, and scores of 3 were coded as “high” prosocial involvement. An index was constructed from these three forms of involvement in the Jewish community. For each form of involvement, respondents who scored “low” were given one point, those who scored “moderate” were given two points, and those who scored “high” were given thre e points—and those who did not score in a dimension were given zero points. When scores across each form of involvement were added up, respondents could have scores between zero and nine points. Respondents with an index score of 0 were coded as having no formal involvement in the local organized Jewish community; scores of 1, 2, and 3 were coded as having low involvement; scores of 4, 5, and 6 were coded as having moderate involvement; and scores of 7, 8, and 9 were coded as high involvement. 2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices 184 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1216 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) DemographicsMale<65YearsOld65Ͳ74YearsOld75Ͳ84YearsOld85+YearsOldOrthodoxConservativeReform/Renewal/ReconstructionistOther/NoneTwoJewishParentsConvertedRaisedJewishOverall 52% 21% 41% 31% 8% 3% 24% 50% 22% 88% 5% 87%NoInvolvement 66% 22% 42% 21% 15% 2% 24% 34% 41% 80% 9% 66%LowInvolvement 49% 22% 41% 31% 6% 5% 25% 46% 24% 86% 2% 96%Mod.Involvement 48% 24% 40% 31% 5% 4% 23% 59% 14% 90% 5% 88%HighInvolvement 47% 11% 44% 39% 6% 4% 25% 57% 14% 96% 3% 95%Unmarried 50% 17% 26% 30% 28% 5% 23% 36% 36% 83% 2% 95%Inmarried 51% 20% 43% 34% 3% 4% 27% 54% 15% 90% 6% 87%Intermarried 64% 33% 55% 10% 2% 0% 9% 46% 44% 83% 0% 100%YearͲRound 54% 26% 38% 25% 11% 4% 21% 49% 26% 84% 7% 81%Seasonal,Primary 51% 16% 47% 34% 4% 1% 25% 51% 22% 92% 4% 91%Seasonal,Secondary 47% 11% 41% 44% 4% 7% 38% 47% 7% 93% 0% 99%InNaples<10Years 47% 27% 49% 23% 1% 4% 30% 46% 19% 91% 4% 92%InNaples10+Years 55% 17% 37% 35% 12% 3% 21% 51% 24% 86% 6% 84%SynagogueMember 47% 20% 37% 38% 5% 5% 28% 60% 6% 91% 5% 91%SynagogueNonͲMember 56% 21% 45% 24% 10% 2% 21% 41% 36% 85% 5% 83%MCA/WCAMember 45% 11% 49% 36% 3% 5% 23% 59% 14% 94% 2% 97%MCA/WCANonͲMember 55% 28% 33% 27% 12% 3% 25% 48% 24% 82% 8% 77%2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices1859.A.7.ePacket Pg. 1217Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) RespondentJewishEducationAttendedDaySchoolAttendedPartͲTimeSchoolAttendedJewishCampParticipatedinYouthGroupHadAnyJewishEducationBecameB'naiMitzvahasChildBecameB'naiMitzvahasAdultOverall 16% 78% 37% 47% 88% 55% 4%NoInvolvement 27% 76% 32% 24% 86% 69% 1%LowInvolvement 9% 72% 31% 38% 84% 48% 3%Mod.Involvement 14% 85% 39% 59% 90% 54% 6%HighInvolvement 11% 79% 49% 73% 92% 50% 9%Unmarried 25% 65% 23% 33% 80% 40% 4%Inmarried 12% 84% 42% 57% 90% 59% 6%Intermarried 12% 82% 41% 33% 93% 69% 1%YearͲRound 21% 72% 36% 36% 84% 56% 3%Seasonal,Primary 10% 88% 35% 57% 92% 58% 4%Seasonal,Secondary 9% 82% 48% 61% 94% 46% 11%InNaples<10Years 11% 84% 33% 51% 91% 52% 4%InNaples10+Years 18% 75% 39% 43% 86% 57% 5%SynagogueMember 11% 85% 43% 65% 92% 55% 9%SynagogueNonͲMember 19% 73% 33% 33% 85% 57% 1%MCA/WCAMember 11% 84% 40% 61% 89% 48% 9%MCA/WCANonͲMember 20% 73% 39% 39% 86% 58% 2%2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices1869.A.7.ePacket Pg. 1218Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) ResidenceAvg.YearsinNaplesInCollierCountyOwnHomeYearͲRoundSeasonal,PrimarySeasonal,SecondarySecondHome:FloridaSecondHome:NortheasternUSSecondHome:MidwesternUSSecondHome:SouthernUSSecondHome:WesternUSSeasonal:IncreaseTimeinNaplesSeasonal:DecreaseTimeinNaplesBurialPlotinNaplesBurialPlotElsewhereOverall 13.17 85% 94% 57% 30% 14% 12% 48% 28% 4% 2% 34% 2% 5% 35%NoInvolvement 11.51 86% 97% 72% 25% 3% 58% 27% 6% 0% 0% 64% 4% 1% 19%LowInvolvement 14.47 85% 93% 60% 19% 21% 4% 48% 39% <1% 1% 31% 3% 2% 36%Mod.Involvement 12.72 84% 94% 45% 40% 16% 4% 51% 29% 8% 3% 27% 2% 7% 42%HighInvolvement 14.19 86% 91% 53% 35% 12% 4% 60% 31% 2% 1% 29% 0% 10% 44%Unmarried 18.48 87% 93% 78% 12% 10% 11% 44% 28% 5% 6% 17% 10% 8% 23%Inmarried 12.22 83% 93% 50% 34% 17% 2% 56% 32% 4% 1% 35% 1% 4% 45%Intermarried 12.42 88% 97% 44% 48% 8% 42% 28% 16% 1% 0% 41% 1% 4% 23%YearͲRound 14.3 87% 94%8% 22%Seasonal,Primary 11.57 80% 99% 18% 46% 25% 4% 2% 35% 2% 1% 52%Seasonal,Secondary 11.93 85% 84% 0% 52% 37% 2% 1% 32% 2% 0% 55%InNaples<10Years 79% 91% 45% 37% 18% 17% 47% 27% 4% 2% 49% 1% 3% 38%InNaples10+Years 87% 95% 63% 26% 11% 8% 49% 30% 4% 2% 21% 3% 6% 34%SynagogueMember 13.27 82% 92% 39% 40% 21% 3% 49% 39% 5% 1% 31% 1% 7% 45%SynagogueNonͲMember 12.93 86% 95% 70% 22% 8% 25% 47% 14% 3% 3% 39% 4% 3% 28%MCA/WCAMember 11.58 79% 93% 35% 43% 22% 1% 52% 36% 5% 3% 23% 0% 5% 52%MCA/WCANonͲMember 14.4 88% 94% 72% 18% 10% 12% 47% 26% 3% 1% 32% 6% 5% 23%2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices1879.A.7.ePacket Pg. 1219Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) HouseholdCharacteristicsInmarriedIntermarriedUnmarriedHHhasLGBTResidentHHhasHolocaustSurvivorHHhasDescendantofHolocaustSurvivorHHRegisteredtoVoteinCollierOverall 53% 16% 31% 1% 2% 15% 85%NoInvolvement 36% 16% 49% 1% 1% 9% 95%LowInvolvement 42% 31% 27% 1% 2% 16% 79%Mod.Involvement 69% 8% 23% 1% 2% 16% 82%HighInvolvement 72% 5% 23% 0% 2% 20% 88%Unmarried 2% 3% 6% 88%Inmarried <1% 1% 17% 82%Intermarried 1% 3% 11% 92%YearͲRound 49% 12% 39% <1% 2% 18% 97%Seasonal,Primary 63% 26% 11% 1% 1% 11% 96%Seasonal,Secondary 68% 10% 21% 2% 2% 17% 9%InNaples<10Years 51% 13% 35% 1% 1% 15% 79%InNaples10+Years 63% 22% 15% 1% 2% 16% 88%SynagogueMember 72% 9% 19% 1% 1% 18% 78%SynagogueNonͲMember 43% 22% 34% <1% 2% 13% 91%MCA/WCAMember 71% 10% 19% <1% 2% 13% 79%MCA/WCANonͲMember 46% 18% 35% 1% 2% 16% 87%2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices1889.A.7.ePacket Pg. 1220Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) SynagoguesandRitualLife(1/2)HHBelongstoLocalSynagogueHHBelongstoNonͲLocalSynagogueHHUsedtoBelongtoSynagogueNonͲMember:NotReligiousNonͲMember:NoChildrenNonͲMember:CostNonͲMember:SocialReasonNonͲMember:NoGoodFitNonͲMember:NotWelcomingtoFamilyAttendsServicesNeverAttendsServices<MonthlyAttendsServicesMonthly+AttendedHighHolidayServicesFastedonYomKippurOverall 26% 23% 40% 73% 47% 45% 16% 40% 10% 29% 53% 18% 51% 43%NoInvolvement 0% 6% 58% 77% 24% 21% 16% 32%ͲͲ80% 18% 3% 17% 15%LowInvolvement 14% 22% 42% 67% 55% 54% 8% 39% 19% 25% 66% 9% 42% 43%Mod.Involvement 41% 34% 30% 68% 63% 62% 17% 50% 16% 11% 68% 21% 70% 55%HighInvolvement 60% 28% 30% 84% 75% 46% 47% 60% 7% 1% 50% 49% 74% 58%Unmarried 20% 12% 40% 63% 44% 15% 9% 31% 15% 43% 43% 14% 39% 24%Inmarried 34% 32% 44% 76% 53% 63% 17% 46% 9% 16% 61% 23% 65% 55%Intermarried 15% 12% 25% 85% 41% 53% 27% 44% 4% 46% 47% 7% 23% 37%YearͲRound 26% 4% 53% 66% 42% 43% 12% 38% 11% 38% 44% 18% 42% 40%Seasonal,Primary 33% 39% 23% 85% 58% 43% 31% 61% 6% 19% 64% 17% 56% 40%Seasonal,Secondary 14% 66% 26% 99% 70% 69% 16% 7% 13% 10% 70% 20% 75% 64%InNaples<10Years 24% 28% 20% 78% 68% 66% 18% 65% 13% 16% 65% 19% 58% 50%InNaples10+Years 28% 20% 44% 70% 43% 38% 15% 29% 10% 36% 47% 17% 46% 39%SynagogueMember 66% 55% 1% 60% 40% 88% 59%SynagogueNonͲMember48% 49% 2% 24% 32%MCA/WCAMember 31% 38% 36% 75% 66% 60% 28% 46% 14% 9% 69% 22% 67% 53%MCA/WCANonͲMember 26% 15% 43% 68% 40% 40% 13% 35% 10% 37% 47% 16% 43% 39%2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices1899.A.7.ePacket Pg. 1221Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) SynagoguesandRitualLife(2/2)LightsShabbatCandles:NeverLightsShabbatCandles:AlwaysAttendedSederLitChanukahCandlesFollowsAnyKosherRulesOverall 59% 8% 81% 77% 21%NoInvolvement 85% 2% 56% 48% 9%LowInvolvement 59% 9% 77% 71% 15%Mod.Involvement 50% 8% 93% 91% 29%HighInvolvement 41% 17% 94% 98% 36%Unmarried 73% 5% 55% 49% 14%Inmarried 48% 12% 95% 94% 29%Intermarried 72% 1% 77% 69% 7%YearͲRound 62% 8% 71% 71% 19%Seasonal,Primary 66% 5% 90% 86% 21%Seasonal,Secondary 35% 15% 97% 89% 33%InNaples<10Years 56% 7% 95% 89% 25%InNaples10+Years 61% 9% 73% 71% 19%SynagogueMember 39% 14% 94% 93% 35%SynagogueNonͲMember 73% 4% 71% 66% 12%MCA/WCAMember 53% 7% 95% 91% 27%MCA/WCANonͲMember 61% 11% 72% 70% 19%2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices1909.A.7.ePacket Pg. 1222Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) PerspectivesonBeingJewish(1/2)CloseJewishFriends:NoneCloseJewishFriends:Some/HalfCloseJewishFriends:Most/AllBeingJewishisaMatterofCulture:VeryMuchBeingJewishisaMatterofEthnicity:VeryMuchBeingJewishisaMatterofReligion:VeryMuchBeingJewishisaMatterofCommunity:VeryMuchConcernedaboutGlobalAntisemitism:VeryMuchConcernedaboutUSCollegiateAntisemitism:VeryMuchConcernedaboutUSAntisemitism:VeryMuchOverall 12% 45% 42% 73% 57% 46% 42% 89% 76% 76%NoInvolvement 42% 45% 13% 77% 53% 14% 25% 91% 81% 90%LowInvolvement 11% 53% 36% 62% 51% 49% 29% 88% 69% 69%Mod.Involvement 1% 51% 48% 76% 61% 54% 51% 88% 76% 71%HighInvolvement 1% 24% 76% 83% 65% 60% 66% 91% 83% 76%Unmarried 22% 56% 22% 59% 51% 27% 29% 91% 71% 80%Inmarried 8% 34% 58% 82% 61% 55% 50% 90% 81% 77%Intermarried 11% 66% 22% 67% 54% 45% 36% 82% 67% 65%YearͲRound 19% 50% 31% 72% 56% 42% 31% 90% 79% 80%Seasonal,Primary 6% 42% 52% 76% 56% 52% 54% 90% 77% 73%Seasonal,Secondary 0% 35% 65% 75% 66% 48% 59% 85% 67% 66%InNaples<10Years 6% 48% 47% 74% 60% 48% 53% 87% 79% 73%InNaples10+Years 16% 44% 40% 74% 56% 45% 36% 91% 76% 78%SynagogueMember 4% 39% 58% 78% 58% 66% 60% 87% 76% 71%SynagogueNonͲMember 19% 50% 31% 70% 57% 30% 28% 90% 76% 79%MCA/WCAMember 1% 33% 66% 77% 59% 50% 55% 88% 77% 72%MCA/WCANonͲMember 20% 51% 29% 68% 53% 46% 32% 89% 73% 76%2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices1919.A.7.ePacket Pg. 1223Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) PerspectivesonBeingJewish(2/2)ConcernedaboutLocalAntisemitism:VeryMuchFeelsConnectedtoWorldwideJewishCommunity:VeryMuchFeelsConnectedtoNaplesJewishCommunity:VeryMuchFeelsConnectedtoOtherͲHomeJewishCommunity:VeryMuchFeelsJudaismisPartofDailyLife:VeryMuchOverall 45% 47% 25% 33% 26%NoInvolvement 81% 25% <1% 7% 6%LowInvolvement 40% 47% 11% 35% 25%Mod.Involvement 36% 53% 29% 37% 29%HighInvolvement 31% 62% 72% 36% 43%Unmarried 56% 43% 20% 30% 17%Inmarried 40% 56% 30% 44% 33%Intermarried 45% 28% 14% 2% 15%YearͲRound 52% 46% 27% 30%Seasonal,Primary 37% 41% 22% 24% 14%Seasonal,Secondary 37% 69% 17% 52% 34%InNaples<10Years 44% 45% 17% 24% 27%InNaples10+Years 46% 49% 28% 40% 25%SynagogueMember 32% 57% 40% 44% 41%SynagogueNonͲMember 55% 41% 14% 17% 15%MCA/WCAMember 37% 49% 37% 34% 27%MCA/WCANonͲMember 47% 49% 18% 39% 26%2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices1929.A.7.ePacket Pg. 1224Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) IsraelBeentoIsrael:NeverBeentoIsrael:OnceBeentoIsrael:MultipleTimesBeentoIsrael:LivedThereBeenonBirthrightIsraelAppliedtoBirthrightIsraelFederationTriptoIsrael:BeenonOneFederationTriptoIsrael:InterestedinOneFriendsinIsraelFamilyinIsraelSoughtNewsaboutIsrael:NeverSoughtNewsaboutIsrael:<DailySoughtNewsaboutIsrael:Daily+FeelsConnectedtoIsrael:VeryMuchOverall 38% 27% 32% 3% 14% 3% 19% 28% 16% 31% 21% 59% 20% 49%NoInvolvement 55% 23% 20% 3%ͲͲ ͲͲ3% 25% <1% 21% 48% 46% 6% 43%LowInvolvement 45% 26% 27% 3% 45% 0% 18% 21% 6% 25% 17% 63% 21% 44%Mod.Involvement 26% 29% 39% 6% 10% 11% 24% 29% 15% 23% 15% 63% 22% 54%HighInvolvement 29% 31% 40% 1% 3% 0% 29% 40% 7% 22% 8% 61% 31% 57%Unmarried 48% 14% 36% 2% 7%ͲͲ8% 29% 7% 30% 44% 44% 12% 40%Inmarried 27% 34% 34% 5% 8% 0% 23% 30% 10% 24% 10% 65% 25% 59%Intermarried 56% 26% 16% 2% 44% 27% 21% 16% 4% 9% 20% 66% 16% 33%YearͲRound 42% 25% 29% 4% 16% 0% 11% 35% 7% 25% 28% 54% 18% 50%Seasonal,Primary 36% 27% 33% 4%ͲͲ ͲͲ29% 17% 9% 18% 16% 62% 22% 44%Seasonal,Secondary 27% 35% 38%ͲͲ ͲͲ ͲͲ29% 22% 7% 26% 9% 71% 20% 59%InNaples<10Years 35% 32% 28% 5% 9% 7% 22% 24% 18% 32% 11% 69% 20% 50%InNaples10+Years 40% 25% 33% 3% 21% 0% 17% 30% 16% 31% 27% 54% 20% 49%SynagogueMember 22% 31% 44% 4% 15% 9% 32% 29% 20% 35% 13% 59% 27% 59%SynagogueNonͲMember 50% 25% 22% 3% 13% 0% 9% 27% 13% 28% 27% 59% 14% 43%MCA/WCAMember 23% 36% 39% 3%ͲͲ ͲͲ32% 24% 44% 20% 12% 74% 14% 50%MCA/WCANonͲMember 45% 22% 29% 4% 16% 4% 11% 32% 56% 15% 28% 48% 24% 51%2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices1939.A.7.ePacket Pg. 1225Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Organizations(1/6)NoInvolvementLowInvolvementMod.InvolvementHighInvolvementHHhasMCA/WCAMemberHHBelongstoOtherLocalOrganizationHHBelongstoNationalOrganizationHHBelongstoOtherCommunityOrganizationHHBelongstoInformalJewishGroupHHBelongstoOtherCommunityInformalJewishGroupInterestedinProgramsͲIsrael:Somewhat/VeryMuchOverall 28% 26% 31% 15% 38% 24% 28% 38% 32% 34% 59%NoInvolvement 0% 19% 0% 55%LowInvolvement 13% 1% 15% 30% 17% 15% 37%Mod.Involvement 60% 20% 28% 48% 38% 34% 67%HighInvolvement 74% 27% 10% 33% 78% 66% 81%Unmarried 43% 23% 23% 11% 25% 11% 7% 39% 24% 28% 48%Inmarried 19% 21% 40% 20% 48% 14% 22% 47% 43% 40% 69%Intermarried 28% 52% 15% 4% 25% 9% 12% 1% 9% 10% 37%YearͲRound 30% 30% 25% 15% 23% 11% 9% 22% 58%Seasonal,Primary 20% 18% 43% 19% 59% 17% 22% 30% 46% 36% 59%Seasonal,Secondary 5% 44% 37% 14% 57% 7% 34% 54% 47% 29% 57%InNaples<10Years 22% 29% 37% 12% 51% 23% 28% 51% 38% 35% 58%InNaples10+Years 24% 28% 30% 18% 32% 25% 24% 30% 29% 33% 58%SynagogueMember 3% 21% 50% 26% 50% 31% 49% 49% 43% 32% 71%SynagogueNonͲMember 37% 34% 21% 9% 29% 19% 12% 19% 24% 36% 39%MCA/WCAMember 10% 56% 34% 20% 20% 41% 55% 48% 63%MCA/WCANonͲMember 27% 43% 23% 7% 7% 14% 36% 19% 14% 56%2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices1949.A.7.ePacket Pg. 1226Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Organizations(2/6)InterestedinProgramsͲCultural:Somewhat/VeryMuchInterestedinProgramsͲSocialActivities:Somewhat/VeryMuchInterestedinProgramsͲEducation:Somewhat/VeryMuchPaysDues:LocalOrganizationPaysDues:NationalOrganizationPaysDues:OtherCommunityOrganizationPaysDues:AnyOrganizationParticipatedinProgram,Event,Class:LocalOrganizationͲ<MonthlyOverall 72% 74% 74% 44% 34% 49% 57% 31%NoInvolvement 79% 90% 93% 2% 20% 2%LowInvolvement 51% 52% 56% 14% 28% 37% 39% 26%Mod.Involvement 80% 77% 78% 69% 45% 55% 80% 53%HighInvolvement 85% 95% 86% 91% 55% 59% 96% 24%Unmarried 80% 75% 81% 34% 21% 33% 43% 26%Inmarried 73% 77% 74% 53% 43% 59% 67% 35%Intermarried 54% 58% 66% 33% 25% 21% 51% 26%YearͲRound 72% 73% 77% 33% 22% 42% 29%Seasonal,Primary 73% 73% 74% 64% 45% 44% 76% 35%Seasonal,Secondary 67% 79% 68% 52% 61% 57% 84% 33%InNaples<10Years 67% 79% 71% 49% 44% 60% 68% 38%InNaples10+Years 76% 71% 76% 42% 29% 41% 52% 27%SynagogueMember 78% 80% 80% 58% 51% 56% 75% 40%SynagogueNonͲMember 67% 69% 69% 34% 21% 36% 44% 24%MCA/WCAMember 78% 85% 74% 78% 53% 56% 90% 38%MCA/WCANonͲMember 67% 66% 75% 24% 23% 39% 37% 27%2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices1959.A.7.ePacket Pg. 1227Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Organizations(3/6)ParticipatedinProgram,Event,Class:LocalOrganizationͲMonthly+ParticipatedinProgram,Event,Class:OtherCommunityOrganizationͲ<MonthlyParticipatedinProgram,Event,Class:OtherCommunityOrganizationͲMonthly+ParticipatedinProgram,Event,Class:AnyOrganizationͲ<MonthlyParticipatedinProgram,Event,Class:AnyOrganizationͲMonthly+ReadOrganizationalMaterial:LocalOrganizationͲ<MonthlyOverall 28% 40% 24% 32% 32% 26%NoInvolvementͲͲ ͲͲ0% 2%LowInvolvement 13% 34% 16% 34% 15% 34%Mod.Involvement 31% 45% 31% 50% 39% 35%HighInvolvement 76% 45% 22% 23% 77% 19%Unmarried 23% 28% 32% 27% 27% 26%Inmarried 30% 49% 23% 36% 35% 27%Intermarried 30% 10% 22% 27% 30% 25%YearͲRound 23% 29% 23% 25%Seasonal,Primary 39% 41% 38% 36% 44% 25%Seasonal,Secondary 28% 19% 33% 39% 44% 32%InNaples<10Years 32% 47% 35% 40% 38% 23%InNaples10+Years 26% 30% 19% 28% 29% 27%SynagogueMember 36% 46% 31% 43% 43% 32%SynagogueNonͲMember 22% 28% 11% 24% 23% 21%MCA/WCAMember 50% 44% 23% 36% 53% 32%MCA/WCANonͲMember 15% 35% 24% 30% 19% 22%2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices1969.A.7.ePacket Pg. 1228Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Organizations(4/6)ReadOrganizationalMaterial:LocalOrganizationͲMonthly+ReadOrganizationalMaterial:NationalOrganizationͲ<MonthlyReadOrganizationalMaterial:NationalOrganizationͲMonthly+ReadOrganizationalMaterial:OtherCommunityOrganizationͲ<MonthlyReadOrganizationalMaterial:OtherCommunityOrganizationͲMonthly+ReadOrganizationalMaterial:AnyOrganizationͲ<MonthlyOverall 43% 25% 45% 24% 49% 21%NoInvolvement 19% 6% 18% 3% 21%LowInvolvement 33% 30% 35% 31% 27% 29%Mod.Involvement 54% 29% 57% 20% 61% 23%HighInvolvement 79% 13% 75% 22% 59% 4%Unmarried 32% 19% 40% 28% 38% 20%Inmarried 48% 30% 48% 24% 59% 23%Intermarried 43% 19% 43% 19% 14% 17%YearͲRound 32% 24% 45% 24%Seasonal,Primary 63% 29% 42% 21% 47% 18%Seasonal,Secondary 46% 22% 49% 29% 52% 16%InNaples<10Years 48% 22% 53% 25% 51% 14%InNaples10+Years 40% 26% 41% 23% 47% 24%SynagogueMember 58% 25% 59% 27% 61% 18%SynagogueNonͲMember 31% 25% 34% 18% 28% 23%MCA/WCAMember 59% 23% 58% 20% 58% 15%MCA/WCANonͲMember 33% 26% 36% 28% 35% 25%2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices1979.A.7.ePacket Pg. 1229Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Organizations(5/6)ReadOrganizationalMaterial:AnyOrganizationͲMonthly+VolunteerLeader:LocalOrganizationVolunteerLeader:NationalOrganizationVolunteerLeader:OtherCommunityOrganizationVolunteerLeader:AnyOrganizationVolunteeredSupportServicesLocalOrganizationVolunteeredSupportServicesNationalOrganizationVolunteeredSupportServicesOtherCommunityOrganizationVolunteeredSupportServicesAnyOrganizationOverall 60% 16% 5% 17% 23% 21% 9% 21% 28%NoInvolvement 6% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%LowInvolvement 51% 0% 2% 10% 4% 2% 6% 12% 9%Mod.Involvement 76% 10% 6% 23% 24% 19% 10% 28% 33%HighInvolvement 96% 75% 12% 17% 79% 77% 24% 22% 79%Unmarried 45% 10% 3% 5% 12% 15% 3% 8% 18%Inmarried 68% 22% 8% 23% 33% 25% 13% 27% 38%Intermarried 60% 8% 1% 2% 8% 14% 3% 7% 15%YearͲRound 50% 16% 2% 16% 21% 5% 21%Seasonal,Primary 73% 14% 11% 5% 16% 24% 12% 19% 39%Seasonal,Secondary 77% 8% 7% 12% 19% 16% 18% 24% 36%InNaples<10Years 73% 15% 8% 23% 26% 19% 11% 25% 31%InNaples10+Years 54% 17% 4% 13% 22% 21% 8% 18% 27%SynagogueMember 80% 25% 11% 25% 40% 30% 16% 25% 43%SynagogueNonͲMember 45% 10% 1% 3% 11% 13% 4% 14% 17%MCA/WCAMember 83% 25% 6% 18% 36% 31% 13% 22% 41%MCA/WCANonͲMember 46% 11% 4% 17% 16% 15% 7% 20% 21%2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices1989.A.7.ePacket Pg. 1230Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Organizations(6/6)VolunteeredasParticipantLocalOrganizationVolunteeredasParticipantOtherCommunityOrganizationVolunteeredasParticipantAnyOrganizationOverall 14% 7% 16%NoInvolvement 0% 0%LowInvolvement 2% 6% 4%Mod.Involvement 14% 10% 18%HighInvolvement 50% 6% 51%Unmarried 11% 10% 13%Inmarried 17% 8% 20%Intermarried 10% 2% 10%YearͲRound 16% 16%Seasonal,Primary 14% 5% 16%Seasonal,Secondary 8% 12% 19%InNaples<10Years 16% 12% 20%InNaples10+Years 13% 4% 15%SynagogueMember 20% 8% 24%SynagogueNonͲMember 10% 7% 11%MCA/WCAMember 22% 8% 24%MCA/WCANonͲMember 10% 7% 12%2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices1999.A.7.ePacket Pg. 1231Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) JewishActivities(1/2)InLastMonth,AttendedShabbatMeal:NeverInLastMonth,AttendedShabbatMeal:WeeklyInLastMonth,AteJewishFoods:NeverInLastMonth,AteJewishFoods:Weekly+InLastMonth,DiscussedJewishTopics:NeverInLastMonth,DiscussedJewishTopics:Weekly+InLastMonth,SearchedOnlineforJewishInfo:NeverInLastMonth,SearchedOnlineforJewishInfo:Weekly+InLastMonth,AccessedJewishCulture:NeverOverall 82% 4% 42% 24% 14% 50% 39% 36% 51%NoInvolvement 93% 3% 70% 22% 39% 11% 63% 8% 95%LowInvolvement 92% 2% 45% 17% 13% 39% 51% 30% 62%Mod.Involvement 80% 3% 39% 24% 7% 65% 25% 45% 36%HighInvolvement 56% 7% 18% 41% 3% 83% 23% 58% 23%Unmarried 87% 2% 53% 29% 25% 38% 61% 22% 55%Inmarried 75% 6% 34% 25% 5% 63% 28% 43% 45%Intermarried 96% <1% 52% 11% 22% 31% 36% 41% 66%YearͲRound 83% 4% 42% 26% 16% 43% 42% 33% 53%Seasonal,Primary 85% 2% 52% 17% 13% 62% 32% 39% 50%Seasonal,Secondary 73% 5% 25% 31% 6% 60% 41% 45% 45%InNaples<10Years 78% 6% 34% 25% 10% 55% 31% 41% 44%InNaples10+Years 84% 3% 46% 24% 15% 49% 43% 34% 54%SynagogueMember 66% 7% 36% 28% 7% 71% 29% 49% 39%SynagogueNonͲMember 94% 1% 47% 22% 19% 36% 47% 26% 61%MCA/WCAMember 78% 4% 35% 28% 9% 67% 32% 43% 36%MCA/WCANonͲMember 84% 4% 47% 22% 16% 41% 44% 32% 61%2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices2009.A.7.ePacket Pg. 1232Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) JewishActivities(2/2)InLastMonth,AccessedJewishCulture:Weekly+InLastMonth,StudiedJewishText:NeverInLastMonth,StudiedJewishText:Weekly+Overall 21% 79% 10%NoInvolvement 4% 97% 3%LowInvolvement 14% 85% 3%Mod.Involvement 27% 75% 13%HighInvolvement 37% 62% 25%Unmarried 22% 83% 6%Inmarried 25% 76% 15%Intermarried 4% 86% 2%YearͲRound 22% 77% 11%Seasonal,Primary 19% 84% 10%Seasonal,Secondary 20% 80% 9%InNaples<10Years 22% 77% 12%InNaples10+Years 21% 81% 9%SynagogueMember 29% 64% 21%SynagogueNonͲMember 15% 91% 2%MCA/WCAMember 29% 82% 9%MCA/WCANonͲMember 16% 78% 11%2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices2019.A.7.ePacket Pg. 1233Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Philanthropy(1/2)MadeAnyDonationinPastYearDonatedtoNoJewishOrganizationsDonatedtoAtLeastOneJewishOrganizationDonatedtoOnlyJewishOrganizationsDonatedtoAtLeastOneLocalJewishOrganizationOfdonors,donatedtoaSynagogueOfdonors,donatedtoJewishFederationofCollierCountyOfdonors,donatedtoaJewishSchoolorCampOfdonors,donatedtoJFCSofSouthwestFloridaOfdonors,donatedtoOtherJewishOrganizationsOverall 92% 20% 80% 4% 57% 55% 60% 13% 23% 51%NoInvolvement 76% 69% 31% 3% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%LowInvolvement 91% 22% 78% 3% 28% 44% 35% 6% 11% 35%Mod.Involvement 98% 4% 96% 6% 90% 59% 69% 13% 23% 46%HighInvolvement 98% 2% 98% 5% 98% 72% 96% 23% 49% 73%Unmarried 87% 30% 70% 6% 47% 36% 50% 11% 19% 50%Inmarried 95% 14% 86% 4% 67% 68% 68% 17% 26% 57%Intermarried 91% 23% 77% <1% 43% 33% 47% 4% 18% 23%YearͲRound 89% 30% 70% 6% 50% 44% 57% 12% 28% 45%Seasonal,Primary 96% 10% 90% 2% 73% 65% 73% 15% 22% 48%Seasonal,Secondary 99% 1% 99% 3% 52% 66% 50% 17% 14% 70%InNaples<10Years 92% 15% 85% 5% 57% 55% 53% 14% 15% 48%InNaples10+Years 92% 23% 77% 4% 57% 54% 65% 13% 27% 52%SynagogueMember 2% 3% 97% 4% 78% 87% 66% 18% 32% 58%SynagogueNonͲMember 12% 33% 67% 5% 41% 19% 55% 9% 14% 42%MCA/WCAMember 98% 5% 95% 4% 82% 61% 80% 16% 29% 55%MCA/WCANonͲMember 89% 30% 70% 5% 42% 49% 44% 12% 18% 46%2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices2029.A.7.ePacket Pg. 1234Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Philanthropy(2/2)ReceivedRequesttoDonatetoJewishOrganizationPlanstoIncreaseGivingLeavingBequesttoNaplesJewishOrganizationOverall 58% 13% 4%NoInvolvement 9% 7% 0%LowInvolvement 51% 10% 2%Mod.Involvement 69% 17% 5%HighInvolvement 93% 17% 11%Unmarried 44% 16% 2%Inmarried 65% 14% 5%Intermarried 57% 5% 4%YearͲRound 52% 14% 2%Seasonal,Primary 72% 13% 9%Seasonal,Secondary 51% 10% 1%InNaples<10Years 53% 17% 5%InNaples10+Years 59% 11% 3%SynagogueMember 71% 16% 8%SynagogueNonͲMember 48% 11% 1%MCA/WCAMember 77% 14% 5%MCA/WCANonͲMember 46% 12% 4%2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices2039.A.7.ePacket Pg. 1235Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) HealthandWellnessHHCaresforElderlyRelativeinNaplesHHhasMemberinFairorPoorHealthHHMemberRequiredMentalHealthServicesOfthose,DidNotReceiveMentalHealthServicesHHMemberhasImpairedFunctionalityHHRequiresHomeͲMaintenanceAssistanceOfthose,DidNotReceiveRequiredAssistanceHHMemberConstrainedfromJewishLifeforHealthReasonsRespondentLivesinSeniorAssistedHousingOverall 8% 20% 10% 10% 10% 13% 15% 6% 6%NoInvolvement 9% 25% 1% 0% 0% 19% 0% 0% 2%LowInvolvement 2% 20% 17% 6% 16% 13% 38% 10% 7%Mod.Involvement 4% 16% 7% 29% 9% 10% <1% 6% 7%HighInvolvement 4% 23% 15% 7% 15% 12% <1% 7% 5%Unmarried 4% 32% 9% 11% 9% 25% 4% 7% 8%Inmarried 3% 18% 10% 10% 13% 8% 25% 6% 6%Intermarried 9% 6% 15% 13% 6% 6% 50% 5% 1%YearͲRound 5% 23% 12% 8% 10% 14% 14% 5% 5%Seasonal,Primary 4% 15% 7% 14% 10% 7% 14% 4% 7%Seasonal,Secondary <1% 20% 9% <1% 12% 16% 0% 16% 7%InNaples<10Years 4% 10% 12% 8% 4% 3% 33% 5% 6%InNaples10+Years 4% 25% 10% 10% 13% 17% 12% 7% 6%SynagogueMember 3% 18% 12% 8% 13% 10% 10% 6% 9%SynagogueNonͲMember 5% 21% 9% 11% 9% 14% 14% 7% 4%MCA/WCAMember 4% 15% 7% 29% 9% 7% <1% 5% 4%MCA/WCANonͲMember 4% 24% 12% <1% 12% 16% 19% 7% 7%2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices2049.A.7.ePacket Pg. 1236Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) FinancialWellͲBeing(1/2)AdultsworkingfullͲtimeAdultsworkingpartͲtimeAdultsretiredAdultsunemployedAdultslookingforworkHHStandardofLiving:ProsperousHHStandardofLiving:JustGettingAlong/NearlyPoor/PoorHHIncome:<$50,000HHIncome:$200,000+HHMemberReceivesSocialSecurity/MedicareHHMemberReceivesWelfareBenefitsHHMemberReceivesSSDI/SSIHHExperiencedHardship:HealthEmergencyOverall 17% 13% 85% 2% 2% 15% 7% 16% 16% 84% 1% 3% 13%NoInvolvement 20% 10% 82% 3% 1% 5% 1% 73% 5% 78% 0% 0% 6%LowInvolvement 18% 12% 76% 1% 2% 16% 11% 14% 14% 84% 1% 6% 13%Mod.Involvement 18% 11% 78% 3% 4% 19% 8% 8% 22% 84% 1% 3% 16%HighInvolvement 8% 15% 85% 1% 1% 14% 4% 7% 18% 90% 2% 2% 18%Unmarried 17% 8% 95% 1% 2% 7% 11% 44% 6% 89% 3% 3% 13%Inmarried 14% 12% 79% 2% 2% 18% 5% 11% 21% 83% <1% 4% 16%Intermarried 24% 15% 64% 4% 4% 20% 6% 10% 16% 78% 0% 2% 5%YearͲRound 22% 11% 76% 3% 4% 6% 11% 32% 8% 81% 1% 2% 16%Seasonal,Primary 9% 12% 84% <1% <1% 34% 2% 3% 29% 85% <1% 3% 11%Seasonal,Secondary 10% 14% 83% 1% <1% 14% <1% 9% 21% 92% <1% 10% 10%InNaples<10Years 14% 13% 77% 2% 4% 14% 7% 11% 15% 79% 1% 3% 13%InNaples10+Years 17% 12% 80% 2% 1% 15% 7% 26% 16% 86% 1% 4% 14%SynagogueMember 16% 13% 79% 2% 1% 24% 4% 7% 25% 83% <1% 3% 17%SynagogueNonͲMember 16% 11% 79% 2% 3% 9% 9% 31% 10% 85% 1% 3% 11%MCA/WCAMember 6% 10% 88% <1% 1% 18% 5% 7% 19% 94% 2% 1% 14%MCA/WCANonͲMember 23% 13% 72% 3% 3% 13% 8% 29% 14% 78% <1% 4% 13%2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices2059.A.7.ePacket Pg. 1237Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) FinancialWellͲBeing(2/2)HHExperiencedHardship:LostJobHHExperiencedHardship:ReducedPayHHExperiencedHardship:ForeclosureHHExperiencedHardship:OwnedBusinessStruggledHHExperiencedHardship:DivorceHHExperiencedHardship:DeathofBreadwinnerHHExperiencedHardship:AnyHHSkippedRent/MortgagePaymentUnabletoAfford$400EmergencyExpenseHHMemberConstrainedfromJewishLifeforFinancialReasonsSavingforRetirement:ConfidentOverall 1% 3% <1% 2% 1% 3% 19% 1% 5% 4% 85%NoInvolvement 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 6% 0% 3% 3% 77%LowInvolvement 2% 5% <1% 2% <1% 4% 23% 1% 5% 4% 80%Mod.Involvement 2% 2% <1% 3% 1% 3% 20% 2% 6% 4% 89%HighInvolvement 1% 2% 2% 1% 1% 2% 23% 1% 6% 6% 91%Unmarried 1% 1% 1% <1% 1% 8% 21% 3% 3% 4% 76%Inmarried 1% 3% <1% 2% 1% 1% 20% <1% 6% 4% 88%Intermarried 3% 4% 0% 5% <1% 0% 13% 1% 6% 4% 89%YearͲRound 2% 2% 1% 3% 1% 4% 22% 2% 5% 7% 77%Seasonal,Primary 0% 1% <1% 1% <1% <1% 13% <1% 2% 1% 93%Seasonal,Secondary 0% 7% 0% 0% 0% 2% 19% 2% 10% <1% 99%InNaples<10Years 1% 1% 0% 1% <1% 2% 17% 2% 6% 5% 86%InNaples10+Years 1% 3% 1% 2% 1% 3% 20% 1% 5% 4% 84%SynagogueMember 3% 2% <1% 2% 1% 2% 21% 2% 4% 4% 88%SynagogueNonͲMember <1% 3% 1% 2% 0% 3% 17% 1% 6% 4% 82%MCA/WCAMember 1% 1% 1% <1% 1% 3% 17% 2% 7% 3% 91%MCA/WCANonͲMember 1% 3% <1% 3% <1% 2% 20% 1% 4% 5% 80%2017 Collier County Jewish Community Study Technical Appendices2069.A.7.ePacket Pg. 1238Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Temple Shalom Community Facility Subdistrict (PL20180003708) Exhibit V.E Public Facilities Level of Service Analysis October 29, 2019 Page 1 of 3 JFGNA-18 Exhibit VE Public Facilities-rev2.docx Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134  239-947-1144  engineering@gradyminor.com  www.gradyminor.com Provide the existing Level of Service Standard (LOS) and document the impact the proposed change will have on the following public facilities: The proposed Temple Shalom Community Facility Subdistrict is a partially developed 13.5± acre parcel. The Subdistrict proposes an additional 22,000 square feet of religious and social organization uses and an increase to 200 pre-school students on the site. The property is zoned Estates and currently permits a church (religious facility). The property is currently developed with a 302-seat church (religious facility) and a pre-school that was approved for 70 children. The public facilities analysis evaluates the project impacts on potable Water, wastewater, drainage, parks, schools, roadways, fire/EMS, and solid waste. The source for the LOS information is the 2018 AUIR. Potable Water The property is located within the Collier County potable water service area. Non-residential development does not directly facilitate population growth and will have no impact on potable water facility capacity. Sanitary Sewer The subject project is served by a private septic system and will continue to utilize a septic system for waste disposal. This Project will have no impact on the Wastewater treatment system capacity. Arterial and Collector Roads Please refer to the Traffic Impact Statement for discussions of the project’s impact on level of service for arterial and collector roadways within the project’s radius of development influence. Drainage The County has adopted a LOS standard for private developments which requires development to occur consistent with water quantity and quality standards established in Ordinances 74-50, 90-10, 2001-27, and LDC Ordinance 2004-41, as may be amended. An environmental Resource Permit (ERP) issued by the South Florida Water Management District will be required, which has established criteria for the volume of water stored on site as well as the quality of the water, 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1239 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Temple Shalom Community Facility Subdistrict (PL20180003708) Exhibit V.E Public Facilities Level of Service Analysis October 29, 2019 Page 2 of 3 JFGNA-18 Exhibit VE Public Facilities-rev2.docx Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134  239-947-1144  engineering@gradyminor.com  www.gradyminor.com which may be discharged from the site. The development within the subdistrict will be consistent with the County LOS standards. Solid Waste The adopted LOS for solid waste is two years of lined cell capacity at the previous 3 year average tons per year disposal rate and 10 years of permittable landfill capacity of the disposal rate. There are no current capacity issues and none are anticipated through the year 2067. Existing: Church (Religious Facility): 302 seats x 1.24 lb/day/person = 374.5 lbs/day Pre-school: 70 Students @ 1lb/student/day = 70 lbs/day 20 staff @ 1lb/staff/day = 20 lbs/day Total = 464.5 lbs/day 574.5 lbs/day x 365 = 209,692 ÷ 2,000 = 105 tons/year Proposed: Church (Religious Facility): 302 seats x 1.24 lb/day/person = 374.5 lbs/day Community Facility: 22,000 x 5 lbs/1,000 sq ft = 110 lbs/day Pre-school: 200 Students @ 1lb/student/day = 200 lbs/day 20 staff @ 1lb/staff/day = 25 lbs/day Total = 709.5 lbs/day 709.5 lbs/day x 365 = 258,968 ÷ 2,000 = 130 tons Current landfill capacity in 2018 is anticipated to be 17,001,964 tons. Total Permitted Landfill Capacity Remaining, 2017 17,244,316 Tons Required Permitted Landfill Capacity, 2017 2,625,495 Tons Total Lined Cell Capacity Remaining, 2017 2,372,915 Tons Required Lined Cell Capacity, 2017 490,736 Tons 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1240 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Temple Shalom Community Facility Subdistrict (PL20180003708) Exhibit V.E Public Facilities Level of Service Analysis October 29, 2019 Page 3 of 3 JFGNA-18 Exhibit VE Public Facilities-rev2.docx Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134  239-947-1144  engineering@gradyminor.com  www.gradyminor.com Source: Collier County 2018 AUIR Cal Recycle Parks: Community and Regional Parks impact fees are not assessed for commercial development or schools. No adverse impacts to Community or Regional Parks result from the amendment of the subdistrict. Schools School impact fees are not assessed for commercial development or schools. No adverse impacts to schools result from the creation of the subdistrict. Fire Control and EMS The proposed project lies within the North Collier Fire Rescue District. The North Collier Fire Rescue District - Station #46 is located at 3410 Pine Ridge Rd, which is approximately 3.9 miles from the western property boundary. The Greater Naples Fire Rescue District - Station #70 is located at 4741 Golden Gate Parkway, which is approximately 3.8 miles from the eastern property boundary No significant impacts to Fire Control level of service are anticipated due to the proposed project. Estimated impact fees for EMS and fire would be determined at time of SDP based on each unit. Sheriff, Fire Protection and EMS Services location/address of facilities intended to serve the project are; North Collier Fire Rescue District - Station #46 3410 Pine Ridge Rd Greater Naples Fire Rescue District - Station #70 4741 Golden Gate Parkway Collier County Sheriff's Office - District 2 (Golden Gate City Substation) 4707 Golden Gate Parkway 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1241 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) North Naples Station 40 Medic 40 Pine Ridge M.S. Headquarters Library 0 4000'2000' SCALE: 1" = 4000' GradyMinor Civil Engineers ●Land Surveyors ●Planners ●Landscape Architects Cert. of Auth. EB 0005151 Cert. of Auth. LB 0005151 Business LC 26000266 Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey Bonita Springs, Florida 34134 Bonita Springs: 239.947.1144 www.GradyMinor.com Fort Myers: 239.690.4380 SUBJECT PROPERTY 9.A.7.ePacket Pg. 1242Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) DocuSign Envelope ID: 028C7117-A64C-4FD8-B7BE-2799116AA746 Exhibit V.E.1 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1243 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) DocuSign Envelope ID: 028C7117-A64C-4FD8-B7BE-2799116AA746 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1244 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) DocuSign Envelope ID: 028C7117-A64C-4FD8-B7BE-2799116AA746 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1245 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) DocuSign Envelope ID: 028C7117-A64C-4FD8-B7BE-2799116AA746 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1246 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) DocuSign Envelope ID: 028C7117-A64C-4FD8-B7BE-2799116AA746 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1247 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) DocuSign Envelope ID: 028C7117-A64C-4FD8-B7BE-2799116AA746 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1248 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) DocuSign Envelope ID: 028C7117-A64C-4FD8-B7BE-2799116AA746 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1249 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) DocuSign Envelope ID: 028C7117-A64C-4FD8-B7BE-2799116AA746 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1250 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) DocuSign Envelope ID: 028C7117-A64C-4FD8-B7BE-2799116AA746 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1251 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) DocuSign Envelope ID: 028C7117-A64C-4FD8-B7BE-2799116AA746 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1252 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) DocuSign Envelope ID: 028C7117-A64C-4FD8-B7BE-2799116AA746 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1253 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) DocuSign Envelope ID: 028C7117-A64C-4FD8-B7BE-2799116AA746 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1254 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) DocuSign Envelope ID: 028C7117-A64C-4FD8-B7BE-2799116AA746 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1255 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) DocuSign Envelope ID: 028C7117-A64C-4FD8-B7BE-2799116AA746 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1256 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) DocuSign Envelope ID: 028C7117-A64C-4FD8-B7BE-2799116AA746 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1257 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) DocuSign Envelope ID: 028C7117-A64C-4FD8-B7BE-2799116AA746 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1258 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) DocuSign Envelope ID: 028C7117-A64C-4FD8-B7BE-2799116AA746 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1259 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) DocuSign Envelope ID: 028C7117-A64C-4FD8-B7BE-2799116AA746 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1260 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) DocuSign Envelope ID: 028C7117-A64C-4FD8-B7BE-2799116AA746 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1261 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) DocuSign Envelope ID: 028C7117-A64C-4FD8-B7BE-2799116AA746 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1262 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) DocuSign Envelope ID: 028C7117-A64C-4FD8-B7BE-2799116AA746 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1263 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) DocuSign Envelope ID: 028C7117-A64C-4FD8-B7BE-2799116AA746 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1264 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) DocuSign Envelope ID: 028C7117-A64C-4FD8-B7BE-2799116AA746 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1265 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) DocuSign Envelope ID: 028C7117-A64C-4FD8-B7BE-2799116AA746 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1266 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) DocuSign Envelope ID: 028C7117-A64C-4FD8-B7BE-2799116AA746 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1267 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) DocuSign Envelope ID: 028C7117-A64C-4FD8-B7BE-2799116AA746 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1268 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) DocuSign Envelope ID: 028C7117-A64C-4FD8-B7BE-2799116AA746 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1269 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) DocuSign Envelope ID: 028C7117-A64C-4FD8-B7BE-2799116AA746 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1270 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) DocuSign Envelope ID: 028C7117-A64C-4FD8-B7BE-2799116AA746 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1271 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) DocuSign Envelope ID: 028C7117-A64C-4FD8-B7BE-2799116AA746 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1272 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) DocuSign Envelope ID: 028C7117-A64C-4FD8-B7BE-2799116AA746 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1273 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) DocuSign Envelope ID: 028C7117-A64C-4FD8-B7BE-2799116AA746 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1274 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) DocuSign Envelope ID: 028C7117-A64C-4FD8-B7BE-2799116AA746 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1275 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) DocuSign Envelope ID: 028C7117-A64C-4FD8-B7BE-2799116AA746 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1276 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) DocuSign Envelope ID: 028C7117-A64C-4FD8-B7BE-2799116AA746 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1277 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) DocuSign Envelope ID: 028C7117-A64C-4FD8-B7BE-2799116AA746 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1278 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Temple Shalom Community Facility Subdistrict (PL20180003708) Exhibit V.F Flood Zone May 6, 2019 Page 1 of 1 JFGNA-18 Exhibit VF.docx Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134  239-947-1144  engineering@gradyminor.com  www.gradyminor.com Subject Property – Flood Zones X500, AH (12) and X 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1279 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) EXHIBIT V.G.3 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1280 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1281 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) am, Coun w COLTIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT ryyvr4r.Eoll ie rgov. net Meeting Notes As of IO\GlzOtT all Zoning applications have revised applications, and your associated Application is included in your notes; additionally a +new Property Ownership Disclosure Form is required for all applications. A copy of this new form is included in your pre-app Note - link is https://www.colljergov.net/HomelShowDocument?id=75093. C*mri ifua\,- Qe,ra , /at&" htt, ll,*/, h\"c1"41 lq-i, lr" Qlr.urt m)f4/)-,,ot-6^ e /FcD- .)1rl buf*u^jFc,y d Ao{*Tf lu L - I i,-,'utet O vt4 t/,*E)r,e-f . l-ct LN t'I r-ht f ?-c-;i u(b t,ll,t ).-fc.F cc* Co - 11 e,e 1 eti f Lu't v cl ' u rr.ib t0 il tuLt )u 7uD h t" et It </o Cnf+ is {o. fia,r $'l o";;i;;6*' '",*qh Jt "t J D plitnt '.) 5,tr7,\7,t,r 2) Er,,**lo Ctt Lo a/fon I Glf <.4> z'/t *c 7 e..v'DA Felq{rar ), o ,rr / +b V"i#l t'/L Jd fo. it-'zirA u-- e0 rL'14 Disclaimer: lnformation provided by staff to applicant during the Pre-Application Meeting is based on the best available data at the time of the meeting and may not fully inform the applicant of lssues that could arise during fhe process. The Administrative Code and LDC dictates the regulations which all applicatlons musl satisfy. Any checklists provided of required data for an application may not fully outline what is needed. lt is the applicant's responsibility to provide all required data. updated 7 /24/201.8 Page l2of5 28OO NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (2391 252-2400 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1282 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Co et County 28OO NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 1239l.2s2-24oo Pre-Application Meeting Notes Petition Type:CznPA Date and Time: 2 - t- ll l:ooa.-, Assigned Planner: .I>*-1 h/ccts Engineering Manager (for PPL's and FP's): Project Name: PL#: 2rl? 0t^)e-wi1 C^Gc*i,-e. t^n )'r Pro lnfor+nation jlltUtma Current Zoning:f Erttks Proj ect Address: lb)o lt"" vil1c PA,City :,frttl.t statei fL zip: )'1 llt' Applicant:'ie*,y1, 5'/,1h^,./w Agent Name: Agent/Firm Addr Property Owner: "ol phone: 1).t- q11'//l'l .rrt 6nt!,Aino, ci1pi,hftt 5f,i,rtstagt&-4ipri f t -, r*"rU *O"^, f * Please provide the fol i. Total Acreage: lowing, if applicable: P,Zz ft. ba ;' ! | ,') ll. iii. iv. Proposed # of Residential Units: Proposed Commercial Square Footage:! 1o,ooo 5 ( For Amendments, indicate the original petition number: lf there is an Ordinance or Resolution associated with this project, please indicate the type and number: vi. lf the project is within a Plat, provide the name and AR#/PL#: lv. b4, bf,10, v"n updated 7 /24/20t8 zb 56f - 8.67 a,t Page | 1 of 5 COTLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net --s Property lD #: 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1283 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 ADDRESSING CHECKLIST Please complete the following and email to GMD_Addressing@colliergov.net or fax to the Operations Division at 239-252-5724 or submit in person to the Addressing Section at the above address. Form must be signed by Addressing personnel prior to pre-application meeting, please allow 3 days for processing. Not all items will apply to every project. Items in bold type are required. FOLIO NUMBERS MUST BE PROVIDED. Forms older than 6 months will require additional review and approval by the Addressing Section. PETITION TYPE (Indicate type below, complete a separate Addressing Checklist for each Petition type) BL (Blasting Permit) BD (Boat Dock Extension) Carnival/Circus Permit CU (Conditional Use) EXP (Excavation Permit) FP (Final Plat LLA (Lot Line Adjustment) PNC (Project Name Change) PPL (Plans & Plat Review) PSP (Preliminary Subdivision Plat) PUD Rezone RZ (Standard Rezone) SDP (Site Development Plan) SDPA (SDP Amendment) SDPI (Insubstantial Change to SDP) SIP (Site Im provement Plan) SIPI (Insubstantial Change to SIP) SNR (Street Name Change) SNC (Street Name Change – Unplatted) TDR (Transfer of Development Rights) VA (Variance) VRP (Vegetation Removal Permit) VRSFP (Vegetation Removal & Site Fill Permit) OTHER LEGAL DESCRIPT ION of subject property or properties (copy of lengthy description may be attached) FOLIO (Property ID) NUMBER(s) of above (attach to, or associate with, legal description if more than one) STREET ADDRESS or ADDRESSES (as applicable, if already assigned) PROPOSED STREET NAMES (if applicable) SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NUMBER (for existing projects/sites only) LOCATION MAP must be attached showing exact location of project/site in relation to nearest public road right- of-way PROPOSED PROJECT NAME (if applicable) SDP - or AR or PL # SURVEY (copy - needed only for unplatted properties) CURRENT PROJECT NAME (if applicable) Rev. 6/9/2017 Page 1 of 2 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1284 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 Please Return Approved Checklist By: Email Personally picked up Applicant Name: Signature on Addressing Checklist does not constitute Project and/or Street Name approval and is subject to further review by the Operations Division. FOR STAFF USE ONLY Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Approved by: Date: Updated by: Date: IF OLDER THAN 6 MONTHS, FORM MUST BE UPDATED OR NEW FORM SUBMITTED Fax Email/Fax:Phone: Project or development names proposed for, or already appearing in, condominium documents (if application; indicate whether proposed or existing) Rev. 6/9/2017 Page 2 of 2 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1285 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Pine Ridge RD Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, i-cubed, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and the GIS User Community Temple Shalom Property Location Map SUBJECT PROPERTY . 160 0 16080 Feet 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1286 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) $ 0 $ 0 $ 71,300 $ 38,000 $ 893,672 $ 5,175,908 $ 6,069,580 $ 6,069,580 $ 0 $ 0 Collier County Property Appraiser Property Summary Parcel No 37926120008 SiteAddress 4630 PINERIDGE RD Site City NAPLES Site Zone*Note 34116 Name / Address TEMPLE SHALOM INC 4630 PINE RIDGE RD City NAPLES State FL Zip 34119-4063 Map No.Strap No.Section Township Range Acres  *Estimated 4B15 334300 64 04B15 15 49 26 13.52 Legal GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 26 TR 64, 65 & 68,LESS S 45FT OF N 75FT OF TR 64,LESS N 75FT OF TR 65 OR 1529 PG 1519 OR 1578 PG1080 Millage Area 100 Millage Rates   *Calculations Sub./Condo 334300 - GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 26 School Other Total Use Code 71 - CHURCHES 5.049 6.5084 11.5574 Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) Date Book-Page Amount 12/12/90 1578-1080 05/01/90 1529-1519 03/01/89 1425-1149 06/01/87 1272-612  2018 Certified Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Land Value (+) Improved Value (=) Market Value (=) Assessed Value (=) School Taxable Value (=) Taxable Value If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after theFinal Tax Roll   9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1287 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1288 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1289 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. Ph. 239-947-1144 Fax. 239-947-0375 3800 Via Del Rey EB 0005151 LB 0005151 LC 26000266 Bonita Springs, FL 34134 www.gradyminor.com October 10, 2019 RE: Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) Petitions PL20180003708 (GMPA), Temple Shalom Community Facility Subdistrict and PL20180003710 (PUDZ), Temple Shalom Community Facility Planned Unit Development Dear Sir or Madam: A Neighborhood Information Meeting hosted by D. Wayne Arnold, AICP, of Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. and Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq. of Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A., representing Temple Shalom, Inc. (Applicant) will be held on Wednesday, October 30, 2019, 5:30 pm at Temple Shalom, 4630 Pine Ridge Road, Naples, FL 34116. Temple Shalom, Inc. has submitted formal applications to Collier County, seeking approval of a Growth Management Plan (GMP) Amendment and a Community Facility Planned Unit Development (CFPUD) Rezone. The companion applications propose to create a new subdistrict in the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) Future Land Use Element and to rezone the property from E, Estates Zoning District to CFPUD Zoning District. If approved, the applications would allow an additional building of up to 22,000 square feet for various religious and social organization uses to join the existing 302-seat church (religious facility) and increase enrollment for the existing pre-school/day facilities to allow a maximum of 200 children and to provide for accessory uses and structures. The subject property is comprised of approximately 13.5± acres, located on the south side of Pine Ridge Road, approximately 0.6± miles west of Collier Boulevard in Section 15, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. Sincerely, Sharon Umpenhour Senior Planning Technician Project Location Map 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1290 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) NOTICE OF NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING Petitions PL20180003708 (GMPA), Temple Shalom Community Facility Subdistrict and PL20180003710 (PUDZ), Temple Shalom Community Facility Planned Unit Development A Neighborhood Information Meeting hosted by D. Wayne Arnold, AICP, of Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. and Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq. of Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A., representing Temple Shalom, Inc. (Applicant) will be held on: Wednesday, October 30, 2019, 5:30 pm at Temple Shalom, 4630 Pine Ridge Road, Naples, FL 34116 Temple Shalom, Inc. has submitted formal applications to Collier County, seeking approval of a Growth Management Plan (GMP) Amendment and a Community Facility Planned Unit Development (CFPUD) Rezone. The companion applications propose to create a new subdistrict in the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) Future Land Use Element and to rezone the property from E, Estates Zoning District to CFPUD Zoning District. If approved, the applications would allow an additional building of up to 22,000 square feet for various religious and social organization uses to join the existing 302-seat church (religious facility) and increase enrollment for the existing pre-school/day facilities to allow a maximum of 200 children and to provide for accessory uses and structures. The subject property is comprised of approximately 13.5± acres, located on the south side of Pine Ridge Road, approximately 0.6± miles west of Collier Boulevard in Section 15, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. The Neighborhood Information Meeting is for informational purposes only, it is not a public hearing. Project information is posted online at www.gradyminor.com/planning. If you have questions or comments, they can be directed to Sharon Umpenhour, Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A., 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, Florida 34134, sumpenhour@gradyminor.com, phone 239-947-1144, fax 239-947-0375. 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1291 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) 1 NAME1 NAME2 NAME3 NAME4 NAME5 NAME6 FOLIO A & T INVESTMENT TEAM LLC 101 25TH ST NW NAPLES, FL 34120---9614 37926520006 ADRIAANSE, MICHAEL JENNIFER ADRIAANSE 4460 11TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34116---4016 37924440007 AGUILAR, RAFAEL & HILDA 4600 7TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34119---0 36612000006 ALBRETS, BEVERLY J & BILL 4711 PINE RIDGE RD NAPLES, FL 34119---4000 37926080009 ALBRETS, BILLY LEONARD 4711 PINE RIDGE RD NAPLES, FL 34119---8911 37926600007 ALEMAN, SONIA 4540 PINE RIDGE RD NAPLES, FL 34119---0 37926680001 ANA LYDIA ALEMAN QPRT 4860 SYCAMORE DR NAPLES, FL 34119---3912 38399440000 BECTHOLD, CAROL 4785 11TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34116---4021 37925840004 BENNETT, LORI J 4730 11TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34116---4022 37924040009 BIHLER, CHRISTINE A 4780 11TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34116---0 37923920007 BLANCO, ALEXIE 4530 PINE RIDGE RD NAPLES, FL 34119---0 37926720000 BOHALL, BLAISE E & MARION 4600 11TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34116---4020 37924240003 BOLANOS, ORLANDO 4451 PINE RIDGE RD NAPLES, FL 34119---0 37927000004 BOWDEN III, WILLIAM A MARY-ZOE BOWDEN 4580 11TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34116---0 37924320004 BOWEN, PATRICIA D 4950 BOXWOOD WAY NAPLES, FL 34116---3930 38398440001 BROWN JR, ALAN 140 WEST ST NAPLES, FL 34108---0 37926880005 CADREAU, SAMUEL A & DIANA A 4655 PINE RIDGE RD NAPLES, FL 34119---4062 37926200009 CALDERON, HILDA & MAYKOL G 4461 PINE RIDGE RD NAPLES, FL 34119---4066 37926920004 CALVERT, BRIAN WALLACE 4631 PINE RIDGE RD NAPLES, FL 34119---4062 37926400003 CARR, CHARLES W & CLAUDIA S 4801 BOXWOOD WAY NAPLES, FL 34116---3927 38399560003 CHIN, LLOYD V & VIRGINIA A 4630 11TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34116---4020 37924280005 CRAIG, JOHN A HARRIET P CRAIG 4420 7TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34119---4034 36613880005 DELGADO, GLORIA 198 W 50TH ST HIALEAH, FL 33012---0 37926960006 DUNN, JEAN C 4675 PINE RIDGE RD NAPLES, FL 34119---4062 37926240001 EADS, ANTHONY L & MARY C 4925 BOXWOOD WAY NAPLES, FL 34116---3929 38398320008 EDWARDS, MARK 4641 PINE RIDGE RD NAPLES, FL 34119---0 37926320002 EVANS, CHRISTINA N 4580 7TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34119---0 36612040008 FAIRHURST, PAUL 4601 11TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34116---4019 37925640000 FAIRHURST, PAUL G 4601 11TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34116---4019 37925600008 FERRIS, MICHAEL & COLEEN 4810 SYCAMORE DR NAPLES, FL 34119---3912 38399480002 FIELDS OF GREEN LAWN CARE INC 2316 PINE RIDGE RD STR 444 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 37923960009 FIGARES, ALEX R & INGRID 4845 SYCAMORE DR NAPLES, FL 34119---0 38286840001 FOLCH, LOUISE PO BOX 990084 NAPLES, FL 34116---0 37926840003 GIBSON, MARIAN H 1425 US 19S IMPERIAL COVE 14-B CLEARWATER, FL 33516---0 37925960502 GOJMAN, JORGE & MARY ANN 14 SWEET FERN RETREAT SAVANNAH, GA 31411---2949 38399320007 GOMEZ-PINO, LILIAM BEATRIZ EDUARDO PINO SANTIESTEBAN 4660 11TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34116---4020 37924160002 GURSOY, A SINAN 4841 SYCAMORE DR NAPLES, FL 34119---0 38287720007 GUY, MAURICE & KHAMSY 4650 11TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34116---4020 37924200001 HAMMER, STEVEN C JOSEPH S HAMMER 4710 11TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34116---0 37924000007 HERNANDEZ, ALBERTO 5405 TAYLOR RD STE 4 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 37927080008 HILBURN, DAVID T & JULIE M 4500 PINE RIDGE RD NAPLES, FL 34119---4003 37926480007 HOLLEY, SHARON L LONNIE D STUBER 4811 TALLOWOOD WAY NAPLES, FL 34116---5001 38399760007 HOTARANU, CRISTIAN MELANIA C BUDIU HOTARANU 3541 1ST AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34117---0 37924360006 HUMOO LLC 1575 PINE RIDGE RD #10 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 37926640009 JONES, BOBBY D 4741 PINE RIDGE RD NAPLES, FL 34119---4000 37926000005 JUSTINIANO, JULIO C PAZ 4771 PINE RIDGE RD NAPLES, FL 34119---0 37925960007 KAMI L JONES 4741 PINE RIDGE RD EXT NAPLES, FL 34119---4000 37926040007 KINNEY, PETER JAMES LINDA DARLENE KINNEY 4661 11TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34116---4019 37925720001 KOCSES TR, WILLIAM J 4460 PINE RIDGE ROAD NAPLES, FL 34119---0 37926800001 LEVY, JONATHAN P 4420 11TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34116---4016 37924520008 LINK, JANET A 4615 PINE RIDGE RD NAPLES, FL 34119---4062 37926280003 LOEWER, DOUGLAS G BEVERLY JEAN LOEWER 4780 PINE RIDGE RD NAPLES, FL 34119---0 37925920005 MADDRILL, DOUGLAS & NANCY 4920 SYCAMORE DR NAPLES, FL 34119---0 38398280009 MARKOVICH, BRANDON DAVID 4870 BOXWOOD WAY NAPLES, FL 34116---0 38399280008 MC ALEAR, DANIEL J & DIANE M 4421 11TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34116---4015 37925320003 MELHEIM, CHARLES J 4690 11TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34116---4020 37924120000 MENTZEL, CHRISTOPHER C TAMMY L REITZ 6612 LINDBLOOM LN CHERRY VALLEY, IL 61016---9137 37926560008 MEYERS, PATRICIA A 4460 7TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34119---4034 36612840004 NAFDOF 22 LLC 2316 PINE RIDGE RD #453 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 38399400008 NAGHIB, ALI B 4815 BOXWOOD WAY NAPLES, FL 34116---3927 38399600002 O'HARA, JAMES L & ROSENDA A 4541 11TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34116---0 37925560009 OKEECHOBEE GGE TRUST 4044 22ND AVE NE NAPLES, FL 34120---8971 37926121007 OLIVE, JOHN & JESENIA 4590 7TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34119---4036 36612040105 O'NEAL, OMALLEY & LISA 4725 11TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34116---0 37925760003 PELOSI, JAMES J & DIANE 4810 BOXWOOD WAY NAPLES, FL 34116---0 38399680006 PEPPERS, DANIEL R & KATHERINE 4830 BOXWOOD WAY NAPLES, FL 34116---3928 38399640004 PEREIRO, CARLOS M & TERESA D 10645 OTTER KEY LN ESTERO, FL 33928---0 37924480009 PIWOWARCZYK, MARK & BRANDY 4781 PINE RIDGE RD NAPLES, FL 34119---4000 37925961006 PRITCHARD, SCOTT 4861 TALLOWOOD WAY NAPLES, FL 34116---5001 38399240006 R M PERGOLIZZI REV TRUST 4840 SYCAMORE DR NAPLES, FL 34119---3912 38399520001 RCM PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT INC 40 WEBER BLVD N NAPLES, FL 34120---3054 36610040000 RECK, ALYCE ELOISE 4561 11TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34116---4017 37925520007 SACACIAN, PETRU & CLAUDIA ANA 4791 11TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34116---4021 37925880006 SARK, JOHN H & JUDIE J 4413 11TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34116---4015 37925360005 SCHMELZLE, GEORGE C & JULIE A 4811 SYCAMORE DR NAPLES, FL 34119---3911 38287900005 SLOVA, ARGON & LULJETA 4510 PINE RIDGE RD NAPLES, FL 34119---0 37926760002 SMIT, DARIN R 4490 LAKEWOOD BLVD NAPLES, FL 34112---0 37925440006 SMIT, DARIN R & DEBORAH S 4490 LAKEWOOD BLVD NAPLES, FL 34112---0 37925400004 SMYTHE, JOHN R & LAURIE S 4680 7TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34110---0 36611960008 SORLING, ANTHONY & KIRSTEN 4490 7TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34119---4034 36612880006 SPARKS, WENDY 4880 SYCAMORE DR NAPLES, FL 34119---3912 38399460006 STEINBACH, KARLA A 4397 11TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34116---4013 37925200000 STEINBACH, KARLA A 4397 11TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34116---4013 37925280004 STEINMANN, CLIFF W AMANDA ALLAN 4570 11TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34116---4018 37924400005 TACKETT, VIRGINIA A PO BOX 953699 LAKE MARY, FL 32795---3699 37926161009 TANNASSEE SR, KENNETH R PO BOX 11623 NAPLES, FL 34101---0 37925940001 TAPALIAN, DAVID C PATRICIA TAPALIAN 4740 11TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34116---4022 37924080001 TEMPLE SHALOM INC 4630 PINE RIDGE RD NAPLES, FL 34119---4063 37926120008 TORRES, VERONICA ANGELICA 4510 7TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34119---4036 36612760003 TRAN, NASH 4631 11TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34116---4019 37925680002 VAN BENSCHOTEN, THOMAS C 4831 TALLOWOOD WAY NAPLES, FL 34116---0 38399720005 Notice: This data belongs to the Collier County Property Appraiser's Office (CCPA). Therefore, the recipient agrees not to represent this data to anyone as other than CCPA provided data. The recipient may not transfer this data to others without consent from the CCPA. Petition: PL20180003710 & PL20180003708 | Buffer: 1000' | Date: 9/23/2019 | Site Location: 37926120008 POList_1000_PL20180003710-PL20180003708.xlsx 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1292 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) 2 VILA, MATTHEW S & JENNY L 4530 7TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34119---4036 36612800002 WILLIG, GEOFFREY A & SARAH L 4745 11TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34116---0 37925800002 YOCOM, BEN C & NANCY P PO BOX 111059 NAPLES, FL 34108---118 38399360009 YOUNG, AUDREY B & RICKY E 4489 11TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34116---0 37925480008 ZERBO, CARL A & HEIDI L 4430 PINE RIDGE RD NAPLES, FL 34119---4001 37927160009 GOLDEN GATE ESTATES AREA CIVIC ASSOC PO BOX 990596 NAPLES, FL 34116 POList_1000_PL20180003710-PL20180003708.xlsx 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1293 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1294 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1295 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Petitions PL20180003708, Temple Shalom Community Facility Subdistrict and PL20180003710, Temple Shalom Community Facility Planned Unit Development (CFPUD) October 30, 2019 Neighborhood Information Meeting 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1296 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) •Debra Antzis, President –Temple Shalom, Inc.(Applicant) •Marc Saperstein, Vice Chair and Project Leader –Jewish Federation Greater Naples •Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq., Land Use Attorney –Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A. •D. Wayne Arnold, AICP, Professional Planner –Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. •Michael T. Herrera, P.E., Engineer –Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. •James M. Banks, PE, Traffic Engineer –JMB Transportation Engineering, Inc. •Marco A. Espinar, Environmental Planning/Biologist –Collier Environmental Consultants, Inc. •James Knafo, Architect –James Knafo Architect, Inc. 2 Project Team 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1297 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) 3 •Located on the south side of Pine Ridge Road west of Collier Boulevard Project Location Map Subject Property White BlvdPine Ridge Rd Collier BlvdLogan Blvd9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1298 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) 4 Aerial Map PINE RIDGE ROAD 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1299 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Current Zoning:E,Estates Temple and Related Uses and Facilities Provisional Use (Resolution 90-418) Child Care Center Conditional Use (Resolution 93-290) Proposed Zoning:Temple Shalom Community Facility Planned Unit Development (CFPUD) Current Future Land Use Designation:Estates Designation,Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict Proposed Future Land Use Designation: Temple Shalom Center Community Facility Subdistrict Project Acreage:13.6+/-acres 5 Project Information 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1300 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) 6 Create a new subdistrict in the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) Future Land Use Element and to rezone the property from E,Estates Zoning District to CFPUD Zoning District.If approved,the applications would allow an additional building of up to 22,000 square feet for various religious and social organization uses to join the existing 302-seat church (religious facility)and increase enrollment for the existing pre-school/day facilities to allow a maximum of 200 children and to provide for accessory uses and structures. Proposed Request 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1301 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) 7 CFPUD Proposed Uses 1.Religious organizations, including churches, temples and other places of worship; religious instruction, religious philanthropic and religious organizations (SIC 8661) 2.Child day care/pre-school center (Tracts 65 and 68 only)(SIC 8351) 3.Civic, social and fraternal association (religious affiliated only)(SIC 8641) 4.Educational, religious or charitable trusts (SIC 6732) 5.Any other principal use, which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the County Manager or designee, pursuant to LDC Section 10.02.06 K. 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1302 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) 8 Prohibited Uses 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1303 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) 9 Proposed Development Standards 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1304 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) 10 Proposed Conceptual Master Plan 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1305 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) 11 Proposed Conceptual Master Plan Overlay 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1306 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) 12 Conceptual Building Elevation 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1307 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) 13 Conclusion •Thank you 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1308 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Transcript PL20180002194 Temple Shalom October 30, 2019 NIM Page 1 of 31 Wayne Arnold: All right. Well, good evening everybody. I’m Wayne Arnold and we’re going go ahead and try to get the meeting started. It looks like we have a few neighbors and we have a lot of representatives from the temple and the Jewish Federation. I’m Wayne Arnold and here representing the project. It’s – we’re here for small scale plan amendment and a rezoning for the Temple Shalom property, which, you know, this building obviously is part of what’s going to be their campus. Can everybody hear me okay? Speakers: No. Wayne Arnold: No? You can’t hear that? Male Speaker 1: [Inaudible] [00:00:28] Wayne Arnold: It’s on. [Crosstalk] Wayne Arnold: This better? Male Speaker 1: Yes. Wayne Arnold: Okay. I’ll try to do that. So, let me make a few introductions. We have Rabbi Miller, who is standing over here. He’s, uh, gracious enough to host us tonight. And we have Debra Antzis from the temple. She’s sitting back here. And we have Jane Schiff and Jeffrey, uh, Feld from the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples. And, um, with me tonight, Sharon Umpenhour, she’s taping the meeting for us. It’s a code requirement. Uh, Jim Banks, sitting next to her, is her traffic engineer. Michael Herrera’s here. He’s the civil engineer from our office that’s doing the, uh, site design work. Rich Yovanovich is our legal counsel, and, um – where’s Clay gone? Clay Brooker is here representing the legal counsel for the temple. And then we also have some county representatives here tonight. They’re here to monitor this and take notes. And David Weeks is here from long range planning, and Tim Finn from Zoning Department and Jeremy Frantz is here with land development and zoning, I guess – multiple roles tonight. But anyway, so, we’re going to give a short presentation and tell you what we’re doing with regard to the plan amendment and for the rezoning. I know that some of you – we held a meeting prior to the submittal of our documents and some of you were present for that meeting. And we’re going to 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1309 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Transcript PL20180002194 Temple Shalom October 30, 2019 NIM Page 2 of 31 go back through and update you on where we are with that process. So, let me find my clicker and I will get started. Maybe I will. Put your [inaudible] [00:01:57] up there, Sharon. There you go. Okay. [inaudible] maybe in reference to that, the location obviously – you’re all familiar with the location. The temple property’s about 13 and a half acres, and a portion of that’s developed. The westernmost portion of the site’s about four and half acres and has not been developed and is not part of the original conditional use approval that resulted in the church and the preschool being located here. So, this is a closer image of the campus itself. Obviously, to the right is the – the sanctuary, the temple building that we’re in, and the preschool building is the southernmost building. The parking is in the center of the site, and then the westernmost portion of the site is the area that, um, is the larger subject of this amendment. Because it would give rights to this portion of the site that’s currently vegetated to allow the Federation and the temple to build a joint building, approximately 22,000 square feet in size, to do sort of the philanthropic aspect of what the Jewish Federation does. And then, also some of the temple functions that, uh, could carry over there. And they host, obviously, special events and Bar Mitzvahs and other activities here that would give them other space as well to utilize on campus. And we think this makes good sense for all that they are doing in conjunction with each other, and their activities that they’re currently involved in together. So, today the property is zoned estates. It’s part of the Golden Gate area master plan, and we’re proposing an amendment to the Golden Gate master plan that would give rights to the temple property to have other religious activities here, including those functions that are conducted by the Federation. And we’re also changing the actual zoning of the land from estates to a planned unit development. And the planned unit development allows us to create a master plan for the campus, it allows us to establish development standards for the campus, and more importantly, list permitted uses and possibly prohibited uses that would be permitted on the site. So, the subdistrict request that we’re creating is going to authorize the construction of the new, approximately 22,000 square foot building. And it would be for religious and social organization activities associated with those that are conducted by the Jewish Federation, as well as the temple. It would establish that the maximum intensity is 302 seats for the church facility or religious organization facility, which is the 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1310 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Transcript PL20180002194 Temple Shalom October 30, 2019 NIM Page 3 of 31 capacity they currently have today. And we’re having a slight increase in children from about 180 that they had enrolled last year to a maximum of 200 for the preschool function. They had an original approval for the preschool. They built the preschool building, and then – and increased their enrollment subsequently, so they’re about 180 kids last year enrolled on campus. So, we’re rounding that number up to 200. So, that, or the – the essence of our request – we’re establishing permitted principal uses, which would allow the religious organization – churches, temple, other places of worship – the childcare preschool center, civic, social, fraternal organization, religious affiliated uses, education, religious, or charitable trusts – which is a large part of the fundraising activities that both organizations do – and then any other use that standard language that’s comparable, that’s, uh, something that we typically have. And then, of course, we establish accessory uses that would be permitted that include the administration offices, the indoor/outdoor recreational activities, and other things like open space and water management that are a part of all of our, uh, submittals. We also are prohibiting certain uses in the project. And we’ve prohibited soup kitchens, homeless shelters, offender rehabilitation agencies, public welfare offices, self-help organizations for alcoholics, and refuge services, because those are things that the county, and a lot of church-related functions these days – there are carryover activities and we’ve put these and other – as restrictions in other projects we’ve worked to make sure that it’s understood what you can’t have on campus. And then, one of the operational standards we’re proposing would be a limitation that no amplified outdoor music permitted after 8p.m. We are establishing our own development standards and we’ve specifically limited the non-sanctuary type building use and the preschool use to the 22,000 square feet that’s identified in your table. We’re keeping our zone height at 30 feet, which is the standard that’s currently in Golden Gate estates, and establish an actual height of 40 feet, which is, Mr. Yovanovich coined the phrase, “It’s kind of the tippy-top number.” So, any [inaudible] [00:06:43] above the two-story building that they’re proposing for the Federation building would have a maximum height of 40 feet. This is our conceptual master plan that we’ve developed for the property, and I’ll just walk you through a little bit of that. Uh, main access point obviously on Pine Ridge Road is located here where 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1311 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Transcript PL20180002194 Temple Shalom October 30, 2019 NIM Page 4 of 31 I’m highlighting on the screen. We’re proposing a second access to the site, um, that would service, um, sort of the centerpiece. It’s called tract 65 as part of the legal description, and so a new access point would be located here. Uh, we’re still talking to the county about what that would be, in terms of right in/right out, left in. The county has not completed our review yet and we’re still negotiating that with them. But the principle part – [Male speaker interjection] Wayne Arnold: If I could finish my presentation, I would be happy to take questions. The main building area remains the same for the temple and the preschool. The parking areas remain largely the same. Uh, open space areas on the perimeter remain the same there, and then the – the bigger changes obviously are impacted by development of the four-and-a-half-acre westernmost parcel. We’re showing parking areas adjacent to the Pine Ridge Road area. The main building area is highlighted here on the master plan. And the center part of the site: future septic system for the expanded building on that site. And then, we have our preserve area that we’ve placed along the entire western side of the – the – the community. County staff has reviewed this. They are comfortable with the preserve location in there. Uh, it serves two functions: it serves as a buffer, as well as our required preservation of native trees on the site. This is an aerial overlay showing you the master plan and how it relates to, you know, what’s on – on the ground today. And we have a building rendering of the conceptual building for the new – new building that would be shared with the Federation temple on the westernmost tract. And that’s about a 22,000 square foot building, and it’s obviously in the conceptual stages today and it’s, uh, not that far along in the physical design of it, but we have some images and working with our building committee to keep refining that. So, in conclusion – you know, again, we’re in for the small scale amendment and the PUD zoning that they’re going to establish the requirements to allow us to have the current functions on the side, as well some of those activities I highlighted that are part of the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples. So, with that I’m happy to take questions from the audience and try to answer questions. We have obviously people from both the temple and the Federation here who obviously can answer questions. Yes. David? I’m sorry? David Weeks: Just please remind people to give their name. Wayne Arnold: Oh, sure, and thanks for the reminder. The county staff and the 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1312 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Transcript PL20180002194 Temple Shalom October 30, 2019 NIM Page 5 of 31 planning commission would like people to give their name if they don’t mind. Or if not, they just want to be able to distinguish if you’re a neighbor, or you’re on our development team, so when the transcript of this comes out, they know sort of who’s talking and who’s asking the questions. So, be happy to – question – I’m going to pass the microphone to whoever wants to ask questions, so we can make sure we capture that. So… Douglas Loewer: My name is, uh, Douglas Loewer. I have property directly to the west of the site, and probably am the one that’s most impacted by what’s going on. Uh, I’m a professional engineer. I’m registered in Florida. I’m also registered in five other states. My background is in sewer water and storm water. I have, uh, got my license in 1980, was registered in Florida in 1983. Uh, I also hold licenses as a wastewater and waterworks, uh, operator and superintendent. All four licenses for waterworks and wastewater works. And I design the – designed, built, and operated the largest septic field system that was ever put in the ground. So, uh, this is my area of expertise, a lot of what’s going on here. I have a couple questions to start with. First of all, I’m for the project. The – I’ve read through about 20% of what Brady Minor put on and, uh, with the county, and I ran into some disturbing stuff. And uh, like to get probably the legal stuff taken care of first, and then get into the design problems. Um. Exhibit F of the Temple Shalom, and CFPD lists the developer commitments. It says, uh – there’s a section here that says, ‘As owner and developer sell off tracts,’ the Temple Shalom being the owner and developer, uh, the [inaudible] [00:12:03] and so forth. Uh, I wasn’t aware that Temple Shalom was going to be in the process of selling off tracts. I thought that Temple Shalom would be continuing here, and I want them to continue here. They’ve been a good neighbor. But if they’re going to be selling off tracts and we’re talking about new people, uh, I’d like to know who the new people are, or what the plan is, so that I know who’s going to be moving in. Wayne Arnold: Okay. I’ll – I’ll be happy to answer your question. This is Wayne Arnold. That is standard PUD monitoring language that the county requires us to put in, because they track these on an annual basis so they can, um, tell how much activity has occurred on site. They want to deal with one entity, so if anything is ever sold, they know that there’s still going to be a single entity that they can contact to find out information about this property. That’s why that language is there. 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1313 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Transcript PL20180002194 Temple Shalom October 30, 2019 NIM Page 6 of 31 Douglas Loewer: Uh, it shouldn’t be saying ‘sell off tracts.’ Wayne Arnold: I – we use this exact language that the county attorney’s office gives us. Douglas Loewer: Well, that’s – Wayne Arnold: And – and there’s no prohibition on anybody selling their property. So – Douglas Loewer: No, but, uh, with this and the other things that I found through the – through the, uh, Brady Minor submission, um, it certainly appears that they’re going to be moving on. Wayne Arnold: I’m not aware of that, but it – there’s nothing that would prohibit the – the temple or anybody else from selling their properties, so – anyway. Yeah, some other comments or questions there? Douglas Loewer: Oh yeah. I’ve got a stack of them. Wayne Arnold: Okay, let’s keep moving through it, because other people may also have questions. Douglas Loewer: Number – number two, was, uh, when you look in the traffic, um, study, it says that the – the 22 – thank you – the 22,000 square feet of associated office space, um – I thought the Federation and Temple Shalom were two different agencies. When I met with Ms. Antzis over here, she said that, uh, there was going to be at least [inaudible] [00:14:04] of some sort, and they [inaudible]. Traffic study indicates that uh, uh, Temple Shalom’s new building is gonna have associated offices, and then go up higher and say that, uh, um, they don’t know what the associated offices are. Uh, I was unaware that there was gonna be such a changeover between the two. I thought these were basically two separate projects on the same site. Wayne Arnold: Well, this is Wayne Arnold again, and the information in the traffic analysis – you – you have to classify a building for what its closest classification is, so Mr. Banks ran traffic numbers based on it being an office. There’s no doubt about it: the Jewish Federation of Greater Naples wants to have its own office space in the new building, but it’s also going to be a potentially shared space so the temple can also have functions and activities there as well. Douglas Loewer: Are the – is the temple actually gonna have office – offices in the 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1314 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Transcript PL20180002194 Temple Shalom October 30, 2019 NIM Page 7 of 31 22,000 square foot room? Wayne Arnold: I don’t know if the temple intends to actually have office space. They have office space in the current building that we’re in today. Douglas Loewer: Yes. I didn’t know if they were expanding into the building also. Wayne Arnold: The building is still capped at the 22,000 square feet that we expressed in the traffic analysis and our zoning documents. Douglas Loewer: So, that’s – we’re – we don’t – we don’t know what the income is gonna come there. Wayne Arnold: I can’t predict that future. I mean, if some date in the future, Debra needs to expand office space, that’s where it would be a logical place to do it. Douglas Loewer: Um, I read the 2017 brochure put out by the Federation and they draw upon about 8,500 people in Uster Count—in Collier County and about 1,500 people outside of the county. So, they have a – a draw of about 10,000 people that they – they can service. Um, nowhere in there, and nowhere in any of the documentation does it indicate how many people they do service. I was wondering if, uh, uh – we did [inaudible] [00:16:17] last time we were here that it was 100 people would be coming into the – the new building each day, but I – I know that 10,000 people aren’t servicing 200 a year – 200 people a year, 500 people a year, 1,000 people a year. Not – because some of those – some that are coming in are coming in on repeated days. Jane Schiff: [inaudible] [00:16:40] Wayne Arnold: Jane, if you’re gonna speak, I need you to be on the record. Douglas Loewer: I’m not sure where [inaudible] [00:16:51] Jane Schiff: Okay, uh, Jane Schiff [inaudible] Jewish Federation of Great Naples. Um, we service, I would say about 2,000 of our nearly 10,000 that the compilation study that you were referring to says that there are approximately 10,000, um, between Collier County and [inaudible] County. We – the 100 people a day that you are referring to are what we were expecting, um – are what we were – would expect on a typical day. There will be a dozen days a year where we have 400 or 500. We might want to mont—monetize the building in offseason and make it available to other people who want to rent it for a day or the event. So, we figure probably 15 or 20 days a year 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1315 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Transcript PL20180002194 Temple Shalom October 30, 2019 NIM Page 8 of 31 – tops – and would be more than that a day. Douglas Loewer: Okay. Well, the reason I’m bringing – the reason I was asking the question was that in your future directions area, that copy, it says, ‘It’s difficult to project whether the community will grow or shrink,’ and that’s because 83% of your, uh, the people in the family are 60 years old and older. Jane Schiff: Correct. Douglas Loewer: And uh, you do not have a very good following thereafter. Uh, in 1% in most of the categories: 20 to 30, 30 to 40, 40 to 50. And the reason I think that’s important is that I want you all to succeed. I want you to be there for a long time. I don’t want to have a change where you have to move out because you don’t have enough people to support your operation, and Temple Shalom has to re-rent and we get a – a – a less satisfactory – don’t want to call you tenant – but – Wayne Arnold: Neighbor. Douglas Loewer: – with a leased neighbor or whatever you want to call them in there. And uh, I don’t – we – when I was talking with Miss Antzis there about a 50 year lease, uh, if you only make it down the line four or five years and you can’t support the 22,000 square foot building – that you don’t have enough people coming in, and we have to have a new – a new entity move in. You know, I don’t want Hertz Rent- a-Car moving in, and having people in and out all the time. Jeffrey Feld: Um, I’m Jeffrey Feld. I’m the CEO of the Federation and I can’t make a promise, because 50 years from now, I’m not gonna be here. You’re not gonna be here. However, I can tell you, that as the Jewish community is growing, and the services are being utilized in terms of bringing people together, the Jewish community is growing. We’re bringing more people together. Um, I don’t think is a concern we need to have at all. Douglas Loewer: Okay. In other words, I would just like to see it continued the way it is. Jeffrey Feld: From your mouth, [inaudible] [00:19:68] [laughter] Douglas Loewer: Um, when I tried to break in earlier there, I was trying to comment on the second entrance to the, uh, outside – well, the new one. Um, it’s my understanding that, uh, both in Submission 1 and Submission 2, the county has rejected that second, um – that second entrance. 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1316 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Transcript PL20180002194 Temple Shalom October 30, 2019 NIM Page 9 of 31 Wayne Arnold: Our last submission, they conceded that we would be allowed at least to have a right in, and Mr. Banks is having continued dialogue. We think they’re going to – they being the county – are going to allow us to have the access that we – as we have proposed. We don’t have that formalized yet, and there will probably be conditions on it, but that’s what we’re still going to continue to push for, that full second access point. Douglas Loewer: And as far as the access point goes in your study, you said that, uh, there would have to be a – a U-turn put into the median somewhere. Jim Banks: A left turn, yes. Douglas Loewer: Left turn/U-turn. Obviously, that can’t be done at the main entrance. I was wondering how far down you were proposing to make that U- turn? Jim Banks: It’s gonna be put at the main entrance. It’s gonna be right across, uh, the left turn lane. It’s coming in to the Temple Shalom map, so the intersection is symmetrical. Douglas Loewer: So, there’s really no need for the other entrance because you’re gonna be turning everybody at the same place. The only people you – the only people that would be going out would be people going to the east down Pine Ridge that aren’t gonna have go down – change lanes and – what is that, 300 feet? Or less, if you have an access lane, and then make a U-turn into oncoming traffic. Jim Banks: U-turns are just part of the design here for all of them. We do them throughout the county. Douglas Loewer: So, your plan is to make the new one right turn only, and then make a U-turn 300 feet away from that, uh, for the whole project? That’s what your plan is? Jim Banks: I’m not sure what you mean by the – for the whole project. Full access for the main road, yes. Essentially, we’re gonna put in a left turn lane, to allow people that prefer to exit out at the new site into a U-turn. It doesn’t mean they have to. They can still turn a left out at the main entrance, or they can around and do a U-turn at the traffic light. It doesn’t mean they have to do it. We’re going to put that provision in. It will serve this project and it could serve anyone else that’s over to the west of us that – that does not full access on the primary – Douglas Loewer: So – so you think that pulling out of the new entrance, making a right turn, and cutting across – changing lanes to the left, and then 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1317 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Transcript PL20180002194 Temple Shalom October 30, 2019 NIM Page 10 of 31 making a left getting in, and then getting into the left turn lane to make your U-turn, that that is a safe proposition? Jim Banks: Yes. We have – there’s multiple locations in Collier County where we – Douglas Loewer: Just because there’s multiple locations in Collier County doesn’t mean they’re safe. Jim Banks: These multiple locations have not proven to be safety issues. We’ve analyzed this, [inaudible] [00:23:03] analysis of that, and that we determined that it would be safe. It will be – any permit that’s issued by the county is conditioned that if an access point is deemed unsafe, it can be removed. So, there is a condition – there will be a condition if it’s approved that it can always be removed if it’s unsafe. We don’t believe it’s gonna be unsafe. It’s not anything unique. They’re – they’re typical throughout Collier County and they’ve been proven to work. Thank you. Wayne Arnold: Thanks Jim. Douglas Loewer: Have you considered putting the main access at the – in the new spot? Jim Banks: No. Wayne Arnold: No, I don’t think we’ve considered that. Douglas Loewer: Okay. Uh. I just pulled a set of documents, uh, off the internet under preserve, allowing the uses. Um, number four says, ‘Water management and water management structures.’ Uh. If I compute the stormwater requirements properly, you’re gonna take up the entire preserve area with water management and water management structures. Wayne Arnold: I think if you’ll note on our master plan, we have a separate area that’s going to be our water management system. What that contemplates is, sometimes you’re allowed to dissipate water in a preserve, or you can discharge to it depending on the type of vegetation. That’s standard language that we have in almost every PUD that we’ve worked on. Douglas Loewer: Well, you know, I’m – I’m sorry, but when it comes to standard language, that’s when you get in trouble. Wayne Arnold: Well, I can tell you, dealing with Collier County, there’s a lot of 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1318 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Transcript PL20180002194 Temple Shalom October 30, 2019 NIM Page 11 of 31 standard language we put in a project that may or not be applicable, but that’s the way the county operates. I mean – Douglas Loewer: So, it’s not your intention to put any water management or water management structures in the preserve? It’s simply as an allowable use. You simply have it in here as a, uh – because the planning requires it. Wayne Arnold: Well, I don’t know that we would never put in any water management in it. I think Michael Herrera, our design engineer, is still looking at the site plan and doing design. We don’t have a water management district permit. Southwater Water Management District ultimately tells us where we discharge and how – how frequently we discharge water from the site. I’m not trying – Douglas Loewer: We’re not talking about discharge. We’re talking about the preserve areas. Wayne Arnold: Yes, I understand that. And they all function together sometimes, is what I’m trying to say. Douglas Loewer: Well, if you’re going to tear down the, uh, preserve areas, to put in water management and water management structures, there’s no preserve area left. Wayne Arnold: The county – the preserve area would depict on the plan, as preserve will have to be placed in a conservation easement. Douglas Loewer: Yeah, but you have it as an allowable use. Wayne Arnold: And the county, I’m telling you, does make provisions for you to have some limited water management use of your preserve. And I don’t know the answer tonight of whether or not we will be putting any water in that preserve or not. Douglas Loewer: Then why don’t you commit to not put any in there tonight? Wayne Arnold: Because I don’t know if I can design the site without doing that. We have not done that level of detailed engineering design. Douglas Loewer: We’re here for a uh – an informational meeting. Wayne Arnold: This is an informational meeting for the [inaudible] [00:26:10] and zoning – yes. This is a – Douglas Loewer: And the way I understand the code, this is the only one you’re gonna 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1319 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Transcript PL20180002194 Temple Shalom October 30, 2019 NIM Page 12 of 31 have. And you – and you – is that correct? Wayne Arnold: This is the only required neighborhood information meeting. Douglas Loewer: Okay, and you don’t intend to have another one? Wayne Arnold: I don’t think we have one scheduled, but, you know, we have had dialogue for the last several months and we’re happy to continue dialogue with you, Mr. Loewer. Douglas Loewer: Uh. Well, I think that – I think it’s important if you’re going to tear down the preserve area for water management. I think that’s the important issue. Wayne Arnold: Well, I understand your concern, but the county will not let us remove the native vegetation from the preserve in order to use it for water management. Douglas Loewer: Well, once again, maybe if we had another meeting you could tell us what – how many square feet you were going to put water management in the preserve area, rather than not being able to tell me anything. Wayne Arnold: Well, I don’t have that – Richard Yovanovich: At this point – Wayne Arnold: Hey Rich, maybe you want to – Richard Yovanovich: For the record, I’m Rich Yovanovich, I’m the attorney for the property. You’re asking for a site development plan of the detail to be done at the rezone level of the project. That’s not simply how it’s done. You will have an opportunity, if you want to, to review all of the site development and documents [inaudible] [00:27:27] and engineers [inaudible], give your input to Collier County staff that we’re ready to do [inaudible]. And I’m required to do it now as part of the PUD process. We are allowed to use preserves as part of the water management. We are not allowed to remove any vegetation to do so, so the characterization that we’re going to go in there and destroy those preserves is simply not correct. And we’re not going to get into the site development plan level of details tonight. We’re here to talk about the uses of the property and what uses, if any on each of the different areas of the property, will not [inaudible] Douglas Loewer: I guess my question for you is, is that a requirement at number four? Is that something that the Collier County requires in every document? 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1320 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Transcript PL20180002194 Temple Shalom October 30, 2019 NIM Page 13 of 31 Richard Yovanovich: It is a standard condition in every Collier County PUD that we can use preserves as part of the water management system as we go through the same – the detailed site development process. That is a standard condition that is in the use. Wayne Arnold: Thank you, Rich. Douglas Loewer: Well. My understanding of the – I guess it’s the PUD, uh, one of the two of them anyway – is that, uh, you can basically shape your zone – what you’re requiring in the zoning – for your one little area. It doesn’t really have to be, uh, what the commercial’s calling for or what the, uh – or what residential’s calling for. You basically tailor the – the, uh – the requirements and setbacks and parking and things like that, uh, based upon just something that, uh, that fits. Uh, I noticed that, uh, when you – I figured your parking for the area – you figured it at, uh, one space per 200 square feet. Works out to 110 spaces. But the building has a large assembly area in it with 160 seats in it. Now, my understanding is that when you have an area that has a different use than the rest – that’s not office space, you would split it out, figure up the parking on that, and then figure up the rest of the parking on the – on what’s – on what’s remaining. When I figured that up, I come up with 140 spaces, uh, based upon what the county requires: 1 per 300 and three per seven, uh, for the – for the assembly area. And I could find nowhere where 100-200 was a – was a number other than on this particular design. Now, do you intend to go to treat the, uh – assembly area as office space? Is that what – because that’s what you’re doing. Wayne Arnold: Well, if I can answer – this is Wayne Arnold. First of all, general office space isn’t calculated at 1 per 200. The 1 per 200 is a higher medical office parking ratio, it requires more parking. And the other thing that you didn’t mention is that we’re going to be sharing parking throughout the entire parking lot for the special events that would occur here, just as the temple would then share in ours when they had a special event. Douglas Loewer: Well, 140 spaces won’t – even 110 – 140 spaces will not be enough for special events, so you’re going to – you’re going to be sharing it anyway. Wayne Arnold: That’s exactly what I said. Yes. We intend to share parking. 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1321 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Transcript PL20180002194 Temple Shalom October 30, 2019 NIM Page 14 of 31 Douglas Loewer: What – what – well, how would you arrive at – oh, you said it was a medical requirement. Wayne Arnold: It’s – it’s a high parking standard, and it’s – furthermore I could argue with a straight face that I don’t need any parking for the separate building because it’s all part of the religious campus that has parking based on how many fixed seats we have in the sanctuary; three per seven parking spaces. Douglas Loewer: Well, if you think you’re accommodating – on any the existing building has, it’s – it has 174. Is it – no, needs to have 174. I couldn’t count them because so many were grass parking. Wayne Arnold: But I think to the point on the parking, for any church or religious facility that’s parked at three seats per seven spaces – three spaces per seven seats, excuse me – the – you know, that doesn’t always account for the wedding, or a special religious event, or the High Holiday that they may have. So, the standards are written for the averages and we’re comfortable that we have ample parking based on the standard for what we’re proposing. Douglas Loewer: And you can assure us that their people won’t be parking, uh, in the median and on either side of the shoulders, uh, during the year. Wayne Arnold: I can never assure you of what a private individual may do. Yeah. Douglas Loewer: Because they’re – they’re – they arrived on the – they were parked all the way down the med—the shoulder last week. I mean – Wayne Arnold: No, I understand your comment. I can’t – Douglas Loewer: – you have the traffic situation with people coming out. We got people parked on the, uh – on the – in the median and the shoulders. And – and nobody seems to consider this a problem. Wayne Arnold: Well, I think the one – the one things you can do, like everybody can else do, is you have an issue and you think it’s an unsafe condition, you can call the Collier County Sheriff’s office and they can come and cite those people for parking in the right of way. I know that doesn’t help the immediate situation, but I don’t know that I can ever guar—give you that guarantee that nobody’s ever going to park on the county right of way. It may not even be anybody related to this – this facility. Douglas Loewer: Describe that to the person that pulls out from the shoulder, and whose car gets hit and the person gets killed. 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1322 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Transcript PL20180002194 Temple Shalom October 30, 2019 NIM Page 15 of 31 Wayne Arnold: Okay. Mr. Loewer, I understand your – your comment. Douglas Loewer: We’ll get back to this. Wayne Arnold: Yeah. Douglas Loewer: You are requesting a deviation. One: parking spaces, uh, with a 70% grass parking. Uh, you – even in the first section, you say that 15% is, uh, normally what off-street parking in the grass is. Um, you don’t have 70% up there. Where is the rest of it going to go? Wayne Arnold: This is – Mr. Loewer, this is considered a conceptual masterplan. This is not a detailed engineering construction site plan. Douglas Loewer: We’re doing a rezoning. Wayne Arnold: Yes, we are. Douglas Loewer: And you are basing that rezoning on things that you can do within this – this area. I – if we’re going to – if we’re going to do the rezoning, and then get the permit down the line, that’s not how it works. Wayne Arnold: That is exactly how it works. Yes. This is not a construction level permitting exercise. Douglas Loewer: Well, my problem is: who – who’s going to be running that building? Richard Yovanovich: Who’s running what building? Douglas Loewer: Well, what you’re saying is that as long as Temple Shalom rents to the Federation, they can – they can rent that building. But when – when the – if the Federation should fail, the Federation should move out – if Temple Shalom should move out, and somebody wants to move back in there, and you’re tailoring the project to them, how is anybody ever going to move into to that – that space? Richard Yovanovich: Well, as you read the list of – sorry, for the record: Rich Yovanovich. If you read the list of permitted uses that can occur on the property, regardless of who the occupant is, whether it’s the temple, whether it’s the Jewish Federation, the uses are limited to child daycare preschool, which is on tract 65 and 68, which are the two to the east. 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1323 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Transcript PL20180002194 Temple Shalom October 30, 2019 NIM Page 16 of 31 Douglas Loewer: Well, that’s fine. But – Richard Yovanovich: You want me to answer your question? Douglas Loewer: What if Temple Shalom rents to somebody else and they have a daycare that has a fulltime lunch in it? Richard Yovanovich: Well, let – can I finish? Before you – the next use is civic, social, and fraternal associations – religious-affiliated only. Very limited group of potential occupants of the property. Educational, religious, or charitable trusts, limited uses on the property. Religious organizations, including churches, temples, and other places of worship, religious construction. Religious, philanthropic, and religious organizations – a very limited group of people – and any other principle use which is comparable in nature to those uses. So, the universe – uh, people or organizations that can use this property are very small. There’s no prohibition from having a daycare that actually feeds its students. Douglas Loewer: Are you going to make them increase the septic field when they do that? Richard Yovanovich: When we get to the level of detail to do that, yes, I’m sure the county is going to say, “How big is your kitchen?” And based upon how big the kitchen is – I’m not an engineer, but I’ve done enough projects – the county has regulations that say ‘This is how big your septic tank needs to be.’ I’m assuming it’s similar to the fact that I have a septic tank at my house. Based upon the square footage and the number of bathrooms, and the number of – I only have one kitchen, but it’s theoretically could have more. That is all required by code and the engineering standards for that, which we will meet every one of those standards. We are just simply asking for the right to do those things today. In Collier County, there’s a – there is a detailed site development plan process that we go through next where the detailed engineering, including the size of the septic field, will be decided. The number of parking spaces will be decided based upon what we put in the building. Today is not the day that we do that. We do that through a site development plan process, and that’s what we’re going to do. You’re – you are asking us to do something way beyond the detail level that we’re at right now for Collier County improvement plans. Douglas Loewer: So, what you’re saying is, is everything is a political thing. 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1324 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Transcript PL20180002194 Temple Shalom October 30, 2019 NIM Page 17 of 31 Richard Yovanovich: No, I never said it’s a – actually, zoning is a quasi-judicial thing in Florida, which means that there are very specific standards, that if we meet them, we get them approved. It’s not a political thing. Douglas Loewer: Well, I can tell you right now that the amount of area you have there for drainage is not near what you need, and by the time you fix the parking and the drainage and the septic, there’s not going to be room for the building. Richard Yovanovich: We’ll see. We – we have a different opinion with different professionals. Douglas Loewer: Well, if you all are – you’re making an opinion now of what to fit. You have – you say you aren’t an engineer – you aren’t looking at the numbers, but you’re going with what’s up there. I can tell you right now that my biggest single concern is that – even Mr. Hernandez says that, uh, it’s nine—is that correct? Wayne Arnold: Herrera. Douglas Loewer: Herrera? I’m sorry. I apologize. Uh, anyhow, uh, that we’re having 9,000 gallons of a day of sewage being put into the ground. There are three houses there – we’ve had around 1,000. I think that’s something that should be with the rezoning because, uh, that’s ultimately going to contaminate the groundwater. Richard Yovanovich: Well, I’m sure that Mr. Herrera will be required to meet the required development standards that exist in the – Douglas Loewer: Now, he was very clear in our last meeting that the only thing he was interested in was the minimum standards and whatever costs the least. I met with him for 20 minutes. Richard Yovanovich: I – I understand, and I don’t want to get into a huge, long debate with you tonight about your feelings about Mr. Her—Mr. Herr—got me calling him – Douglas Loewer: Well, he’s doing – he’s – Richard Yovanovich: Mr. Herrera and what you think will happen – Douglas Loewer: He’s doing what he was told. Richard Yovanovich: I will tell you at the end of day, if we can’t fit the 22,000 square foot building that we’re going to hopefully get approved through the zoning process, we’ll have a smaller building. My guess is – an I’ve 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1325 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Transcript PL20180002194 Temple Shalom October 30, 2019 NIM Page 18 of 31 known Michael for a long time – he’s got a pretty good idea of what will fit based upon what’s on the property and we’re willing to go through that process – Douglas Loewer: Well, my concern about the 70% grass is that that changes the stormwater. Richard Yovanovich: And again, we have a very detailed site development plan process that will handle water management. And do you know who should call? Call Matt McClain – Douglas Loewer: I got it. He won’t return my call. Richard Yovanovich: Well, I’m sure then call – can get his – his, you know, direct number if you don’t have it. Douglas Loewer: I called six people over there since I met with – where’s Mr. Mirandas? Is he here? Richard Yovanovich: They’ve got – they’ve got David Weeks. You’ve got Tim Finn. Douglas Loewer: I called – [Crosstalk] Wayne Arnold: You can’t talk over each other. Richard Yovanovich: They will be happy to pass along to Mr. McLean that you would like a return call. That’s all I can do tonight. So, could – could we move on to not detailed engineering related questions? Talk about what we’re asking for on the property. For a person who opened up by saying you want this project to happen on the property, I don’t really – I don’t really get that feeling, but maybe I’m mis—misreading things. Douglas Loewer: If it means you can solve the sewage problem, that’s my line of work, okay? If we’re going to dump 9,000 gallons in the – in – in the subsoil, and we’re not going to treat it, which is what he said, you’re – we’re going to have contaminated groundwater. Richard Yovanovich: It’s going to meet the code requirements. We have to meet the code requirements. Douglas Loewer: Well, here – here – here’s the question for you then. Richard Yovanovich: Okay. We’ll go all night. 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1326 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Transcript PL20180002194 Temple Shalom October 30, 2019 NIM Page 19 of 31 Douglas Loewer: You all – the county approves all of this stuff and I will put in my two cents, so you will all be aware of what my concerns are. When it fails – because I have yet to be wrong on one of these in 40 years – and I’ve gotten many, many letters from towns that have – are going the direction you’re going – it will be an apology letter down the line. I want to know who’s going to – who’s going to fix the contaminated groundwater? The county isn’t. You all approve what they did. So, they’re going to say, “The county approved it, so we did everything we had to do,” and you’ll end up with a Love Canal. Or a – or a Dundoff, like in this area, where it was okay to do it in the ‘60s and ‘70s, but now nobody’s got to spend millions of dollars to clean it up. That water – that groundwater gets contaminated, I can tell you right now, when – when people start pumping the, uh – not only their domestic water – but they’re going to pump that up on the sprinkler system and put e. coli right out on the ground. That’s what happens when it gets contaminated. Now, who’s going to pay for it? Richard Yovanovich: We – we don’t agree with your comments, so can we just move on? We’ll be here all night. Douglas Loewer: Well, just – I just want to know who’s going to pay for it. Richard Yovanovich: Well, I’ll worry about when and if that ever happens. Douglas Loewer: Is – is – is this Temple Shalom’s problem? Richard Yovanovich: When and if that ever happens, we’ll address that scenario. I’m not going to address it tonight. Douglas Loewer: Well, if it’s anything like Dundoff, they were 30 years stuck discussing it. I’d like to know who is going – who is going to pay for it? Richard Yovanovich: Well, I’m telling you – Douglas Loewer: Because they’re going to contaminate the groundwater. They’re going to flood out the people on the other side of the street with their drainage. Richard Yovanovich: Yeah, I think we’re done. I think we’re done. I’m not going to keep going. I’m not answering the question, because I don’t think it’s going to happen, and we’ll deal with it when and if it ever happens. So, can we move on and let other people speak? 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1327 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Transcript PL20180002194 Temple Shalom October 30, 2019 NIM Page 20 of 31 Douglas Loewer: Okay. And you’re – then you’re – then you’re saying that I can’t speak anymore? Richard Yovanovich: No, I’m – I’m just asking to – no sir. Give him back the mic. Douglas Loewer: That’s fine. Richard Yovanovich: Do you have anymore land use related questions? Douglas Loewer: I’ll see – when you say it’s a judicial issue, I guess that’s where you want me to go with it. Richard Yovanovich: Okay. Beverly Loewer: [Inaudible] [00:44:02] affect us. Wayne Arnold: If you’re going to speak, Ma’am, I have to have you on the microphone. Sharon? You want to – Beverly Loewer: I said, [inaudible] Richard Yovanovich: State your name. Beverly Loewer: Beverly Loewer. If you have the groundwater – is not controlled, it’s going to affect our property. Next, it’s going to affect our septic – our well system. Wayne Arnold: Yes. Beverly Loewer: And I’m very concerned about that. Wayne Arnold: And we understand that, and that’s why – Beverly Loewer: I don’t have the details and the numbers, but I just know I don’t want it to affect my property over there. Wayne Arnold: Well, we certainly don’t want that either. Beverly Loewer: [Inaudible] awhile. Wayne Arnold: Anybody else have questions? Yes, sir. Sam Cadreau: Good evening. Sam Cadreau, I live directly across the street, uh, 4655 Pine Ridge. Um, I’ve got a couple of different concerns. Number one, there again with the – the groundwater – the – the 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1328 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Transcript PL20180002194 Temple Shalom October 30, 2019 NIM Page 21 of 31 amount of occupancy for the building and you – you all have the luxury of being on city water. We don’t. Speakers: We don’t. Sam Cadreau: Right. The temple does. Speakers: But we don’t. Sam Cadreau: Everyone else around here is on private wells. Beverly Loewer: Yes. Sam Cadreau: So, I just want to make sure that everybody understands that. So, everything that comes off, whether even stormwater or drainage from the building, uh, sewage from the building goes into a private septic system for the temple and all the property. Now, my first question is if we were to build the same building on a piece of property to accommodate the building, the proper parking, and all that – that we would have an assembly in this building, how big of a piece of property would we have to have? Now, who can in the county answer that for me? Obviously, it would not be the size of that piece of property. It would be a lot larger. The reason it’s getting by as being changed, because you’ve got a shared parking, and I understand. And a lot of people probably don’t realize, but the question is why isn’t that whole parking lot paved? Because the size of the property and the size of [inaudible] [00:46:35] water that needs to be retained on that piece of property – that’s why that parking lot is not fully paved. Wayne Arnold: Can I – can I interrupt you to – Sam Cadreau: Yes, go ahead. Wayne Arnold: This is Wayne Arnold again. I didn’t mean to cut you off, but the county has very specific requirements and actually allows grass parking for churches and other places of assembly because of the infrequent use of some of those parking spaces, and there are standards for that. So, that’s why you already have grass parking on the site. It wasn’t because we’re trying to overdevelop it and we need it. The county actually will make us utilize some of that as impervious area anyway, even if it’s grass. Sam Cadreau: Right. And I understand that, but I’m – that’s what I’m saying though, that if we were to build this same building on a piece of 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1329 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Transcript PL20180002194 Temple Shalom October 30, 2019 NIM Page 22 of 31 property, how large of a piece of property would it have to be to accommodate the building and the proper parking for that building? Wayne Arnold: I don’t think we’ve done that analysis to know a – a specific answer to your question. Sam Cadreau: What you – what is being presented is because we’re doing that shared parking. That’s a lot. Okay. Wayne Arnold: Yes, sir. And that is – that’s – that’s part of the – the concept of their campus and that’s why it’s a good fit for the Federation and the temple to share those facilities. Sam Cadreau: Now, two other – two other concerns. My basic – when I started my first job in high school doing six years of land survey, so I know how to look at a piece of land and I know how to look at deeds and properties. If everybody will look on the screen and look at the yellow line that encompasses the property that the temple owns. Why is that piece of property – that line up there on Pine Ridge Road, which we all legally own to the center of the road, even though there’s 75 foot right of way – it jogs down on part of the parking lot and encompasses across the whole piece of property in question that the temple does not even own. I have the deeds right here in my hand that other people own that property. When you make that access, you’re making an access across a piece of prior private property, even though it’s a right of way, as the county right of way. Wayne Arnold: Can I answer your question? Sam Cadreau: Sure. Wayne Arnold: Because I – I do know the answer to this. Um, the title work that was prepared for this property demonstrates that even though those were under alternate access points, they were given right of way for Pine Ridge expansion, so it actually is under the control of Collier County and will have the ability to access the county right of way. So, it was part of the right of way taking, yes. Sam Cadreau: Okay, so you can right of way even though there is a deed for that property that – that they’re – you’re crossing? Wayne Arnold: Yes, sir. Sam Cadreau: Okay. All right. Just wanted to clarify that. Um, another major factor 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1330 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Transcript PL20180002194 Temple Shalom October 30, 2019 NIM Page 23 of 31 – and I’m going to – I hate to say it, but I’m a – I’m going to throw the traffic engineer under the bus right here. Okay? I spent 25 years with the City of Naples Fire Department. I have worked accidents left and right. I live directly across the street. I know when there’s an accident in front of this entrance every time it happens, unless I’m out of town or we’re on duty. Okay? Um, to – to dispute your idea of a right turn second access coming out, and like the other gentleman said, having to cross lanes and then make a U-turn up to go back west, it is really pushing the limit for the traffic. If you really want this project, it really needs to be pushed seriously to have to have a traffic light. And I think that this other prior meeting, that members of the church and members of the Federation were 100% behind that, because it’s too dangerous. I’ve seen too many accidents out there. Uh, we have to do a U-turn in the median to get back to our driveway in a road that’s doing 50mph, posted speed limit. And they’re not doing 50, they’re doing 60, okay? It’s too dangerous. This project – if you’re going deal with this project, you need a traffic light. You need the safety built into this, because it’s just way too dangerous. There have been too many accidents out there. I don’t know the exact numbers, but I think you know that I can a phone call down to the sheriff’s office, because I know [inaudible] [00:50:50] Randolph personally, and I could have that in about 10 minutes. Okay? But this needs to be considered highly before this project even goes. And to go back on also with the county, the church is looking to rezone this property, which is now a zone residential. You’re going to go through a process to zone it to multi-use for a church. Understand. But all the answers haven’t been given, and all the problems haven’t been solved, but yet, if it doesn’t pass, then that property’s going to be zoned back commercial. Then they’re going to be sitting on it. What’re they going to do? Wayne Arnold: If – if I just clarify that. If – if this would not be approved, the lands that we’re talking about largely – the four and half acres that are undeveloped today will remain zoned estates and would allow only estate zoned uses. They would not allow the church uses on it without going through the same process again. Sam Cadreau: So, that would – okay – let – let – okay, let me clarify. If we go through the rezoning – to get the rezoning to be able to provisional use for church – 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1331 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Transcript PL20180002194 Temple Shalom October 30, 2019 NIM Page 24 of 31 Wayne Arnold: We’re asking for it to be a permitted use, not a provisional use. Sam Cadreau: Okay, permitted. Okay. Wayne Arnold: Yes. Mm-hmm. Sam Cadreau: So, it gets rezoned as that. But then, as the rest of the procedure goes through and the county commissioners do not approve the overall building of the building and the site management and all, is that property still going to be under provisional use, or will it automatically go back to the residential use as well? Wayne Arnold: Well, right now, the portion that we’re sitting in today that’s been developed for the parking, the childcare, and the sanctuary are all, uh, provisional use, not conditional use. Sam Cadreau: Right. I understand. Wayne Arnold: So, that’s how they approved under the Golden Gate master plan. We’re asking to rezone the entire campus to a planned unit development to allow this use and the Federation uses on the site consistent with the – the uses that I’ve gone over and those that Rich read into the record. Sam Cadreau: Okay. Wayne Arnold: So, if we get that approved, that’s what we’re approved for. Sam Cadreau: Okay. Wayne Arnold: If we don’t get that approved, then the temple is left with exactly what is has today. Sam Cadreau: I understand. I understand that whole part. Wayne Arnold: Okay. Sam Cadreau: What I’m understand about the four and a half extra acres that you’re looking at – at rezoning from residential to provisional use, if they get changed to provisional use and the whole plan does not go through – the whole plan just tanks – the temple’s still going to have their original property – understand – they’ll still own the western four and a half acres. But it’s residential now. They could turn around and sell it off as residential property and get of that property. So, if it gets rezoned as provisional use, the whole plan tanks and it doesn’t go anywhere, is it still going to stay provisional use 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1332 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Transcript PL20180002194 Temple Shalom October 30, 2019 NIM Page 25 of 31 property? Or will it revert back to residential at that point? Wayne Arnold: Well – well, the term is planned unit development, not provisional use, just to be clear, but yes, once it’s rezoned, the PUD – it is a PUD – it’s no longer zoned estates. Sam Cadreau: So, they – they would have to go back and forth – in order to sell it later on, they would have to go back for another rezoning of it back to residential? Wayne Arnold: That is correct. Female Speaker 1: Or we come up with another plan. Sam Cadreau: Okay. Wayne Arnold: Yeah, you would either go through and rezone it or amend this zoning to allow some alternate use. Sam Cadreau: That’s why – that’s why – I understand what this gentleman was saying about having some answers before we go into looking into rezoning some property, because it’s a procedure. You’re rezoning this, and then all of a sudden, you can’t use it for what you wanted to use it for, being rezoned, so what are you going to do with it? Understand where I’m going? Wayne Arnold: I do, but if they can’t use for it what they’re intending, it would remain vacant. Sam Cadreau: Right. Right. Wayne Arnold: That’s the answer. Female Speaker 1: [Inaudible] [00:54:26] [Phone rings] Wayne Arnold: Jimmy. Sam Cadreau: Okay. Understand. Thank you very much. Wayne Arnold: Okay. Thank you. Anybody else? Ladies? Want to – no? Female Speaker 2: Um, I just agree with him with the traffic thing. I really do. Wayne Arnold: Okay. Noted. Anybody else have a question? Comment? Yes, 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1333 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Transcript PL20180002194 Temple Shalom October 30, 2019 NIM Page 26 of 31 ma’am? Female Speaker 3: [Inaudible] [00:54:42] Wayne Arnold: Hang on. One at a time, please. This lady’s – Female Speaker 3: They said with the traffic light situation was turned down. Diana Cadreau: I know an officer – my name is Diana Cadreau and I live right across from the temple. [inaudible] in agreement with the project getting through. We’re a little concerned with the size of the 22,000 square foot building, as well as the number of individuals that will be using this building and the social functions. I think that’s all that we’re very concerned about. Um, and what we’re also very concerned about the – the entrance and the – and the exits. The one or maybe the proposed second entrance. Um, again, this is a very dangerous area in the road again with the speed. Again, we see multiple accidents as it spans as it now. My thought is if we did change the main entrance and exit to be further down, uh, what are your thoughts on that? Wayne Arnold: Are you suggesting farther to the west for the access point, closer to the second access point we’re showing? Diana Cadreau: Yes. Wayne Arnold: I’ll – I’ll let Jim try to answer that. The county has access space and criteria between driveways, so I’m not sure we have an opportunity to shift both access points farther to the west, but I’ll let Jim answer that – try to. Jim Banks: Uh, this is Jim Banks again. I – yeah, we met with the county. There is no option move that full access further to the west. As you can see on the area that’s already a full access to the, uh, lowering in front from the existing property, uh, which we can align up with. And there’s also another full access further to the west from there. And Collier County has specific, um, access spacing requirements, and currently this doesn’t even meet their current standards. So, we certainly could not shift that access any further to the west. We would be in full violation of their intersection separation criteria. Diana Cadreau: How did it initially get approved that – that we’re already in violation? Jim Banks: The access points are already there. And this – this access would be 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1334 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Transcript PL20180002194 Temple Shalom October 30, 2019 NIM Page 27 of 31 the one that would be considered in violation, so if any access got closed, it would this one right here. Wayne Arnold: He – he’s referring to the county median, not the driveway connection to our site. Jim Banks: Yeah. The driveway – yeah – the median opening. You see this existing median opening? This is one does not meet the separation standards for the Temple Shalom full access. So, if one was to be closed, it would be this one right here. That’s why we didn’t even attempt to line up with – because it would be closed. Diana Cadreau: Okay. Wayne Arnold: Thanks Jim. Anybody else? Before we – yes, ma’am? Janet Lee: Yeah, um, I – Wayne Arnold: You need to be on the microphone if you’re going to speak. We have to capture the comments on the record, please. Janet Lee: My concern is how do I cross the street? Female Speaker 2: Name? Janet Lee: My name’s Janet Lee. Female Speaker 2: Thank you. Janet Lee: You’re welcome. And the thing is, like Sam said, we have had a lot of accidents, just you people coming out. I’m not saying you as in – but there has been. Um, one of the accidents actually, the man got mad because he hit a motorcycle and he was a kid down the street and was upset because he said “He hit my bumper off.” That is exactly what he said and I couldn’t believe it and the kid’s lying in the ditch. Um, the county needs to do – look at the traffic on this road and take into consideration you and everybody else coming in and out. Wayne Arnold: Yes, and they will. This is Wayne Arnold again. They certainly will. That’s part of their analysis on looking at our proposed locations to make sure they’re going to meet those spacing criteria. Janet Lee: Or reduce the speed. Yeah. We need the speed limit – Wayne Arnold: Yeah. That’s something that – 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1335 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Transcript PL20180002194 Temple Shalom October 30, 2019 NIM Page 28 of 31 Jim Banks: Yes. Wayne Arnold: – that we can’t control – the speed, but certainly that’s something – Janet Lee: I feel if you drive this every day – Wayne Arnold: I don’t drive it every day and I’m sure you do. Yeah, you live here, and I don’t. I get that. Janet Lee: It’s – it’s terrific. It’s awful getting out and it’s awful getting back into, and I’ve been here for four years. Wayne Arnold: Understood. Understand your concerns. Beverly Loewer: [Inaudible] [00:59:04] Wayne Arnold: Anybody else have a comment? Anybody else? Beverly Loewer: I said, I’m really pissed [inaudible] all the traffic was backed up [inaudible] get into the parking lot. Do you know what I’m talking about? Last week? Wayne Arnold: I didn’t experience it. Debra’s back here nodding her head because, you know, she obviously hosted the event here at the temple. So – but understood. Douglas Loewer: I have – I have one further question. Here, uh, you list on the site that gets us into the county that this meeting is going to be – is the only one you’re holding for this and the other one you’re, uh, processing. Wayne Arnold: That’s correct. We’re jointly conducting the comp plan meeting and the zoning meeting. That’s what this is about. Douglas Loewer: So, I don’t have an opportunity at another meeting to discuss these things on site for the other – for the other half of the project where it gets to design, because you’ve jammed both of them together here. That correct? Wayne Arnold: No, well it makes sense to combine them. The comp plan language and the zoning go hand in hand – Douglas Loewer: So, you then you aren’t going to – you aren’t going to hear what I have to say about drainage and septic on this one. 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1336 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Transcript PL20180002194 Temple Shalom October 30, 2019 NIM Page 29 of 31 Wayne Arnold: Well, Mr. Loewer, I – I don’t want to get to get into a debate either – Douglas Loewer: Then – then when are you going to hear it? Wayne Arnold: We’ve had dialogue with you and then we’ve got extensive emails. We’re in the process of trying to get additional testing done. Michael’s looking at other site design opportunities. We’re trying to address all of your concerns. This is just very early in the process for what – Douglas Loewer: Well, then why – then why is this the only informational meeting? Wayne Arnold: What I said is this is the only county-required meeting. The county by nature requires us – Douglas Loewer: Well, I don’t have trouble for – for this one – Wayne Arnold: And – and I think as – Douglas Loewer: – and for the one for the design, I don’t know how you can list this for that? For the second one. Wayne Arnold: Well, the site design process is not a public process. It’s an engineering review, because it’s – it’s based on all the codes and standards you have to design – Douglas Loewer: So, any concerns anybody has about any of the other items out here don’t matter. Wayne Arnold: No, I didn’t say that. Douglas Loewer: Because you – because you’re having – you’re having an informational meeting on basically the site design, uh, before you’ve done the site design, and you won’t even let me talk about it because you’re talking about the other project first. Wayne Arnold: Well, and I think this is not the site – Douglas Loewer: I’m going to be standing before the county commissioners. Wayne Arnold: That’s okay. Those are public hearings and – Douglas Loewer: Because I don’t – I – I think – I think everybody at least gets to talk on – on – on the second issue. Even if you get the rezoning approved, you’re saying – yeah, there has to no more informational meetings. 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1337 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Transcript PL20180002194 Temple Shalom October 30, 2019 NIM Page 30 of 31 Wayne Arnold: The county requires us to have informational meetings as part of the zoning process that we’re going through now. They do not require those meetings when we get to the engineering site review. Those are conducted by – Douglas Loewer: So then, why is it listed on both of the two? Wayne Arnold: I’m not sure I understand. Douglas Loewer: On the county document, you’ve listed this as – you’re – you’re trying to get two things approved. Wayne Arnold: Yes. A conference in plan amendment and a PUD rezoning. Douglas Loewer: And you’re – you’re saying that this – this is the only informational meeting with the – where this is going to go on – Wayne Arnold: I said this is the only – Douglas Loewer: – until – until the place gets – until after the place is built. Wayne Arnold: It’s – it’s the only code-required meeting. Mr. Loewer, we invited you and other neighbors to a very informal meeting before we even submitted application materials. We’re happy to continue dialoguing with you or any of the other neighbors that have issues. Douglas Loewer: Yeah, but you just don’t want to hear them. Wayne Arnold: This is not – Douglas Loewer: You don’t want to hear the issues. Wayne Arnold: Mr. Loewer, this is not the forum, as Mr. Yovanovich mentioned, to deal with site specific development issues. There’s another set of codes and regulations that we deal with. Douglas Loewer: Well, very basically, when it fails, I want to know who’s responsible. Wayne Arnold: Mr. Loewer, [inaudible] [01:02:43] on the record. Douglas Loewer: I want to know who’s responsible. Basically, when it fails, I want to know who’s responsible. Who’s going to pay for it? Wayne Arnold: Got it. Thank you. If there are no other comments or questions, I’m 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1338 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) Transcript PL20180002194 Temple Shalom October 30, 2019 NIM Page 31 of 31 going to go ahead and close the meeting and appreciate everybody taking their time to come out. Douglas Loewer: It is going to fail. Wayne Arnold: And if you have notice for this meeting, you’ll get notice for when we get to public hearings to, um, deal with the planning commission and the board of county commissioners. And that’ll be a couple different step process of public hearings, but you’ll get notice for that and there will be signs posted on the properties. I’m sure you’ve seen for other projects around the county, so with that good night and thank you. Male Speaker 1: Thank you. [End of Audio] Duration: 64 minutes 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1339 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1340 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1341 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1342 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) 9.A.7.e Packet Pg. 1343 Attachment: 03_Transmittal Application-Petition (12062 : Temple Shalom) 9.A.7.f Packet Pg. 1344 Attachment: 04_ CCPC Affidavit & Advertisement (12062 : Temple Shalom) 9.A.7.f Packet Pg. 1345 Attachment: 04_ CCPC Affidavit & Advertisement (12062 : Temple Shalom)