The URL can be used to link to this page

Agenda 06/09/2020 Item # 9A (Ordinance - Shadowwood PUD)9.A 06/09/2020 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve an Ordinance amending Ordinance Number 82-49, as amended, the ShadowWood Planned Unit Development (PUD), to redesignate 4f acres of land from Tract C, private air park district, to Tract E, residential development; by adding the development standards for Tract E; by amending the master plan to add 3 access points to provide ingress and egress to Tract E including access to Polly Avenue, Atkins Road and Whitaker Road; by removing a requirement that all access roads to the PUD are private roads; and by revising developer commitments. The subject property consisting of 77.99f acres is part of the 168.1-acre PUD located at Wing South Air Park, east of Santa Barbara Boulevard between Davis Boulevard and Rattlesnake -Hammock Road, in Section 16, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. [PL20190000259] OBJECTIVE: To have the Board of County Commissioners (Board) review staffs findings and recommendations along with the recommendations of the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) regarding the above -referenced petition and render a decision regarding the petition, and ensure the project is in harmony with all the applicable codes and regulations in order to ensure that the community's interests are maintained. CONSIDERATIONS: The subject property consists of 77.99+/- acres and is part of the 168.1-acre PUD located at Wing South Air Park, east of Santa Barbara Boulevard between Davis Boulevard and Rattlesnake -Hammock Road, in Section 16, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. This petitioner seeks to amend ShadowWood PUD, approved via Ordinance #82-49, as amended, to redesignate 4+/- acres of land from Tract C, private air park district, to Tract E, residential development; by adding the development standards for Tract E; by amending the master plan to add 3 access points to provide ingress and egress to Tract E including access to Polly Avenue, Atkins Road and Whitaker Road; by removing a requirement that all access roads to the PUD are private roads; and by revising developer commitments. FISCAL IMPACT: The PUD Amendment (PUDA) by and of itself will have no fiscal impact on Collier County. There is no guarantee that the project, at build -out, will maximize its authorized level of development. However, if the PUD Amendment is approved, a portion of the land could be developed, and the new development will result in an impact on Collier County public facilities. The County collects impact fees prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy to help offset the impacts of each new development on public facilities. These impact fees are used to fund projects identified in the Capital Improvement Element of the Growth Management Plan as needed to maintain the adopted Level of Service (LOS) for public facilities. Additionally, in order to meet the requirements of concurrency management, the developer of every local development order approved by Collier County is required to pay a portion of the estimated Transportation Impact Fees associated with the project in accordance with Chapter 74 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances. Other fees collected prior to issuance of a building permit include building permit review fees. Please note that impact fees and taxes collected were not included in the criteria used by Staff and the Planning Commission to analyze this petition. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: The subject site is identified as Urban Designation, Urban Mixed -Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict on the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) of the GMP. The f168.1-acre Planned Unit Development (PUD) was originally approved via Ord. #82-49 and Packet Pg. 17 9.A 06/09/2020 subsequently amended with Ordinance #08-43. As amended, ShadowWood allows a total maximum of 574 residential units at a maximum density of 3.4 dwelling units per acre (DU/A) - (574 DUs _ 168.1 Acres = 3.415 DU/A = 3.4 DU/A). According to the FLUE, "within the Urban designated areas, a base density of four residential dwelling units per gross acre may be allowed, though is not an entitlement." Although Tract 'E' was always intended for residential uses (multi -family), it remains undeveloped to date. In preparation for developing this tract, the petitioner is requesting to modify the Master Plan to indicate three new ingress/egress points for Tract 'E,' all three connecting to local public roads: one to connect with Polly Avenue, one to connect with Whitaker Road, and one to connect with Atkins Ave. Based upon the above analysis, Staff concludes the proposed changes to the ShadowWood Planned Unit Development (PUD) may be deemed consistent with the Future Land Use Element (FLUE). (See Attachment B - FLUE Consistency Review) Transportation Element: In evaluating this project, Staff reviewed the applicant's Traffic Impact Statement for consistency with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan (GMP) using the applicable 2018 Annual Update and Inventory Reports (AUIR). Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP states; "The County Commission shall review all rezone petitions, SRA designation applications, conditional use petitions, and proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) affecting the overall countywide density or intensity of permissible development, with consideration of their impact on the overall County transportation system, and shall not approve any petition or application that would directly access a deficient roadway segment as identified in the current AUIR or if it impacts an adjacent roadway segment that is deficient as identified in the current AUIR, or which significantly impacts a roadway segment or adjacent roadway segment that is currently operating and/or is projected to operate below an adopted Level of Service Standard within the five-year AUIR planning period unless specific mitigating stipulations are also approved. A petition or application has significant impacts if the traffic impact statement reveals that any of the following occur: a. For links (roadway segments) directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; b. For links adjacent to links directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; and c. For all other links, the project traffic is considered to be significant up to the point where it is equal to or exceeds 3% of the adopted LOS standard service volume. Mitigating stipulations shall be based upon a mitigation plan prepared by the applicant and submitted as part of the traffic impact statement that addresses the project's significant impacts on all roadways. " Staff finding: According to the documents provided with this petition, there are no additional residential units proposed, and aviation tract "C" is not changing. Therefore, this petition remains consistent with the GMP, and the network of arterial and collector roadways have sufficient capacity to accommodate this development within the five-year planning period. Transportation issues related to this petition are therefore not consistency related. Concerns, however, have been expressed related to compatibility and Transportation Planning staff are providing the following: Packet Pg. 18 9.A 06/09/2020 The existing access on Rattlesnake is a signalized intersection that provides safe and managed ingress and egress for the development. Skyway Drive the main internal north -south access also provide direct access for a number of the single-family residents which can cause conflicts. The internal roadways within the development contain some sidewalks however they are not continuous or consistent (likely due to some of the early development pre -dating LDC sidewalk requirements). Collier County uses local roadways capacity of +/-2,000 vehicles per day (vpd) and 200 vehicles per hour (vph) when reviewing requests for Neighborhood Traffic Management Program (NTMP, commonly known as our traffic calming program). According to the TIS provided with this petition the development will place +/- 187 PM peak hour two-way trips with the highest percentage distribution estimated on Adkins Avenue at 50% which results in an additional +/- 93.5 PM peak hour two-way trips which is less than 50% of the criteria used to qualify for the NTMP program. GMP considerations: o Objective 7: Develop and adopt standards for safe and efficient ingress and egress to adjoining properties, and encourage safe and convenient on -site traffic circulation... o Policy 9.5 (part of Objective 9 Neighborhood Traffic Management Program): The County shall encourage projects which provide local residents, pedestrian, bicyclist and motorist movement between and among developments on neighborhood streets in a deliberate balance with its efforts to route cut -through traffic away from neighborhoods and to the arterials and collectors designated in this Transportation Element of the Collier County Growth Management Plan. Staff notes that the local roadways noted in the petition have recently been paved; however, they do not have sidewalks or street lighting. As noted above, this request is consistent with the GMP, and the TIS provided with the petition demonstrates that there remains capacity on the adjacent arterial and collector roadways within the five- year planning period. Therefore, Transportation Planning staff has reviewed the petition for compliance with the GMP and the LDC and recommends approval. Conservation and Coastal Management Element (COME): Environmental review staff has found this project to be consistent with the Conservation & Coastal Management Element (CCME). No revisions to the environmental portions of the PUD petition are being made. The proposal is consistent with the COME. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION (CCPC): The CCPC, heard Petition PUDA- PL20190000259, ShadowWood PUD on February 20, 2020, and voted 5-2 to forward this petition to the Board with a recommendation of approval subject to the following stipulations: - Modifications to Section 5.6 of the PUD document The amenity center shall be 100 feet from the PUD boundary - Approval of the three access points The following commissioners denied this petition for the following reasons: Planning Commissioner Mark Strain (denied): - Not fair to put the traffic burden and the access points on the residents that live to west. A Packet Pg. 19 9.A 06/09/2020 connection to the south should have also been looked at. - We don't give that many access points to a PUD - Was not provided with enough detail to give a favorable motion - The RSF-4 zoning should not be the basis for saying they can't have any traffic through this area to provide a connection to the south. Planning Commissioner Karl Fry (denied): Not fair to put the traffic burden and the access points on the residents that live to west. A connection to the south should have also been looked at. Letters of objection have been received. Therefore, this petition has been placed on the Regular Agenda. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This is an amendment to the existing ShadowWood PUD (Ordinance No. 82-49, as amended). The burden falls upon the applicant for the amendment to prove that the proposal is consistent with all of the criteria set forth below. The burden then shifts to the Board of County Commissioners, should it consider denial, that such denial is not arbitrary, discriminatory or unreasonable. This would be accomplished by finding that the amendment does not meet one or more of the listed criteria. Criteria for PUD Amendments Ask yourself the following questions. The answers assist you in making a determination for approval or not. 1. Consider: The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. 2. Is there an adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of agreements, contract, or other instruments or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense? Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the County Attorney. Consider: Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives and policies of the Growth Management Plan. 4. Consider: The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. Is there an adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development? Packet Pg. 20 9.A 06/09/2020 6. Consider: The timing or sequence of development (as proposed) for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. 7. Consider: The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. 8. Consider: Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. 9. Will the proposed change be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies and future land use map and the elements of the Growth Management Plan? 10. Will the proposed PUD Rezone be appropriate considering the existing land use pattern? 11. Would the requested PUD Rezone result in the possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts? 12. Consider: Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. 13. Consider: Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed amendment necessary. 14. Will the proposed change adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood? 15. Will the proposed change create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety? 16. Will the proposed change create a drainage problem? 17. Will the proposed change seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas? 18. Will the proposed change adversely affect property values in the adjacent area? 19. Will the proposed change be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations? 20. Consider: Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an Packet Pg. 21 06/09/2020 9.A individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare. 21. Are there substantial reasons why the property cannot ("reasonably") be used in accordance with existing zoning? (a "core" question...) 22. Is the change suggested out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the county? 23. Consider: Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. 24. Consider: The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. 25. Consider: The impact of development resulting from the proposed PUD rezone on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance [Code ch.106, art.II], as amended. 26. Are there other factors, standards, or criteria relating to the PUD rezone request that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare? The Board must base its decision upon the competent, substantial evidence presented by the written materials supplied to it, including but not limited to the Staff Report, Executive Summary, maps, studies, letters from interested persons and the oral testimony presented at the Board hearing as these items relate to these criteria. This item has been approved as to form and legality, and requires an affirmative vote of four for Board approval (BFAC) RECOMMENDATION: Staff concurs with the recommendation of the CCPC and further recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approves the request for Petition PUDA-PL20190000259, ShadowWood PUD. Prepared by: Timothy Finn, AICP, Principal Planner, Zoning Division ATTACHMENT(S) 1. Staff Report ShadowWood PUDA (PDF) 2. Attachment A - Revised Proposed Ordinance - 030420 (PDF) 3. Attachment B - FLUE Consistency Review (PDF) 4. Attachment C - Development Standards Comparison Table (PDF) 5. Attachment D - Acreage aggregation into Tract E (flat) (PDF) 6. Attachment E - Opposition Letters (PDF) Packet Pg. 22 9.A 06/09/2020 7. Attachment E.1 - UTILITY EXHIBIT 3-4-20 (flat) (PDF) 8. Legal Ad - Agenda ID 11194 (PDF) 9. [Linked] Attachment F Application -Backup MateriAls (PDF) 10. Item No. 11194 (PDF) 11. Attachment F - Waiver Applicant for hybrid quasi-judicial hearing- ShadowWood (PDF) 12. Attachment G - Revised TIS - 05-27-2020--certified (PDF) Packet Pg. 23 9.A 06/09/2020 COLLIER COUNTY Board of County Commissioners Item Number: 9.A Doe ID: 11194 Item Summary: ***This item to be heard no sooner than 1:00 p.m.*** This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve an Ordinance amending Ordinance Number 82-49, as amended, the ShadowWood Planned Unit Development (PUD), to redesignate 4f acres of land from Tract C, private air park district, to Tract E, residential development; by adding the development standards for Tract E; by amending the master plan to add 3 access points to provide ingress and egress to Tract E including access to Polly Avenue, Atkins Road and Whitaker Road; by removing a requirement that all access roads to the PUD are private roads; and by revising developer commitments. The subject property consisting of 77.99±: acres is part of the 168.1 acre PUD located at Wing South Air Park, east of Santa Barbara Boulevard between Davis Boulevard and Rattlesnake -Hammock Road, in Section 16, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. [PL20190000259] Meeting Date: 06/09/2020 Prepared by: Title: — Zoning Name: Tim Finn 02/21/2020 2:50 PM Submitted by: Title: Manager - Planning — Zoning Name: Ray Bellows 02/21/2020 2:50 PM Approved By: Review: Growth Management Department Zoning Growth Management Department Growth Management Department County Attorney's Office Judy Puig Level 1 Reviewer Ray Bellows Additional Reviewer Thaddeus Cohen Department Head Review James C French Deputy Department Head Review Heidi Ashton-Cicko Level 2 Attorney of Record Review County Attorney's Office Jeffrey A. Klatzkow Level 3 County Attorney's Office Review Office of Management and Budget Debra Windsor Level 3 OMB Gatekeeper Review Office of Management and Budget Laura Zautcke Additional Reviewer County Manager's Office Nick Casalanguida Level 4 County Manager Review Board of County Commissioners MaryJo Brock Meeting Pending Completed 02/24/2020 10:50 AM Completed 02/24/2020 6:02 PM Completed 02/25/2020 6:15 PM Completed 02/27/2020 2:45 PM Completed 03/04/2020 2:32 PM Completed 03/04/2020 2:50 PM Completed 03/04/2020 3:22 PM Completed 03/11/2020 8:27 AM Completed 03/14/2020 1:37 PM 06/09/2020 9:00 AM Packet Pg. 24 9.A.1 AGENDA ITEM 9.A.2 Coer C MHty STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: ZONING DIVISION — ZONING SERVICES SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING DATE: JANUARY 16, 2020 SUBJECT: PUDA-PL20190000259 SHADOWWOOD OWNER/APPLICANT: AGENT: SD Corporation of Naples, Inc. Clyde Quinby 2150 Goodlette Road N. Clyde C. Quinby Realty, Inc. Naples, FL 34102 2400 Coach House Ln. Naples, FL 34105 There are many other owners that have not joined in the petition. REQUESTED ACTION: The petitioner is requesting that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) consider an application to amend Ordinance Number 82-49, as amended, the ShadowWood Planned Unit Development (PUD). GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property consists of 77.99+/- acres and is part of the 168.1-acre PUD located at Wing South Air Park, east of Santa Barbara Boulevard between Davis Boulevard and Rattlesnake - Hammock Road, in Section 16, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. (see location map, page 2). PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: This petitioner seeks to amend ShadowWood PUD, approved via Ordinance #82-49, as amended, to redesignate 4+/- acres of land from Tract C, private air park district, to Tract E, residential development; by adding the development standards for Tract E; by amending the master plan to add 3 access points to provide ingress and egress to Tract E including access to Polly Avenue, Atkins Road and Whitaker Road; by removing a requirement that all access roads to the PUD are private roads; and by revising developer commitments. PUDA-PL20190000259; ShadowWood Page 1 of 17 Revised: January 9, 2020 Packet Pg. 25 9.A.1 (Dc v QD `r � N O C � e) O O O O N N O (T N O � S m n 0 O n PROJECT LOCATION k Location Map Zoning Map Petition Number: PL20190000259 Packet Pg. 26 9.A.1 SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: Because this petition is amending the ShadowWood PUD Document, this section of the staff report identifies the land uses and zoning classifications for properties surrounding the boundaries of the entire ShadowWood PUD area. It shall be noted; the aerial (page 4) shows the proposed ingress/egress locations and Tract E shaded in blue: North: Developed residential, with a current zoning designation of Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club PUD (1.43 DU/AC), which is approved for a golf course and single and multiple family dwelling units. Preserve area, with a current zoning designation of Agriculture East: Preserve area, with a current zoning designation of LASIP Conservation Area (CFPUD), which is approved for restoration, protection and preservation of native vegetative communities and wildlife habitat, and stormwater management; vacant area with sparse vegetation, with a current zoning designation of Naples Lakes Country Club PUD (1.67 DU/AC), which is approved for single, multifamily, commercial, office, and recreational uses South: Rattlesnake Hammock Road, a six -lane arterial roadway, and then developed multi- family, with a current zoning designation of Lely Resort PUD (3.1 DU/AC), which is approved for single, multi -family, commercial, professional, educational, cultural, recreational, and conservation uses West: Developed residential, with current zoning designations of Residential Multi-Family- 6 District (RMF-6), Residential Single Family-3 District (RSF-3), and Agriculture (A) with an ST overlay Intentionally blank PUDA-PL20190000259; ShadowWood Revised: January 9, 2020 Page 3 of 17 Packet Pg. 27 L. IWct E - (portion of PUD rele-want to ikis PLTDA petition, shaded in blue) rt - 4.6 4,. moo. �UMM _ �.Maw - w1- r J . fy. 9.A.1 GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY: The GMP is the prevailing document to support land -use decisions, such as this proposed amendment. Staff is required to make a recommendation regarding a finding of consistency or inconsistency with the overall GMP as part of the recommendation for approval, approval with conditions, or denial of any amendment petition. This petition is consistent with the GMP. Future Land Use Element (FLUE): The subject site is identified as Urban Designation, Urban Mixed -Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict on the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) of the GMP. The ± 168.1-acre Planned Unit Development (PUD) was originally approved via Ord. #82- 49 and subsequently amended with Ordinance #08-43. As amended, ShadowWood allows a total maximum of 574 residential units at a maximum density of 3.4 dwelling units per acre (DU/A) — (574 DUs - 168.1 Acres = 3.415 DU/A = 3.4 DU/A). According to the FLUE, "within the Urban designated areas a base density of four residential dwelling units per gross acre may be allowed, though is not an entitlement." Although Tract `E' was always intended for residential uses (multi -family), it remains undeveloped to date. In preparation for developing this tract, the petitioner is requesting to modify the Master Plan to indicate three new ingress/egress points for Tract `E', all three connecting to local public roads: one to connect with Polly Avenue, one to connect with Whitaker Road, and one to connect with Atkins Ave. Based upon the above analysis, staff concludes the proposed changes to the ShadowWood Planned Unit Development (PUD) may be deemed consistent with the Future Land Use Element (FLUE). (See Attachment B — FLUE Consistency Review) Transportation Element: In evaluating this project, staff reviewed the applicant's Traffic Impact Statement for consistency with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan (GMP) using the applicable 2018 Annual Update and Inventory Reports (AUIR). Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP states; "The County Commission shall review all rezone petitions, SRA designation applications, conditional use petitions, and proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) affecting the overall countywide density or intensity of permissible development, with consideration of their impact on the overall County transportation system, and shall not approve any petition or application that would directly access a deficient roadway segment as identified in the current AUIR or if it impacts an adjacent roadway segment that is deficient as identified in the current AUIR, or which significantly impacts a roadway segment or adjacent roadway segment that is currently operating and/or is projected to operate below an adopted Level of Service Standard within the five-year AUIR planning period, unless specific mitigating stipulations are also approved. A petition or application has significant impacts if the traffic impact statement reveals that any of the following occur: a. For links (roadway segments) directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; PUDA-PL20190000259; ShadowWood Revised: January 9, 2020 Page 5 of 17 Packet Pg. 29 9.A.1 b. For links adjacent to links directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; and c. For all other links the project traffic is considered to be significant up to the point where it is equal to or exceeds 3% of the adopted LOS standard service volume. Mitigating stipulations shall be based upon a mitigation plan prepared by the applicant and submitted as part of the traffic impact statement that addresses the project's significant impacts on all roadways. " Staff finding: According to the documents provided with this petition there are no additional residential units proposed and aviation tract "C" is not changing. Therefore, this petition remains consistent with the GMP, and the network of arterial and collector roadways have sufficient capacity to accommodate this development within the five-year planning period. Transportation issues related to this petition are therefore not consistency related. Concerns however have been expressed related to compatibility and Transportation Planning staff are providing the following: • The existing access on Rattlesnake is a signalized intersection which provides safe and managed ingress and egress for the development. Skyway Drive the main internal north -south access also provide direct access for a number of the single-family residents which can cause conflicts. The internal roadways within the development contain some sidewalks however they are not continuous or consistent (likely due to some of the early development pre -dating LDC sidewalk requirements). • Collier County uses local roadways capacity of+/-2,000 vehicles per day (vpd) and 200 vehicles per hour (vph) when reviewing requests for Neighborhood Traffic Management Program (NTMP, commonly known as our traffic calming program). According to the TIS provided with this petition the development will place +/- 187 PM peak hour two-way trips with the highest percentage distribution estimated on Adkins Avenue at 50% which results in an additional +/- 93.5 PM peak hour two-way trips which is less than 50% of the criteria used to qualify for the NTMP program. • GMP considerations: o Objective 7: Develop and adopt standards for safe and efficient ingress and egress to adjoining properties, and encourage safe and convenient on -site traffic circulation... o Policy 9.5 (part of Objective 9 Neighborhood Traffic Management Program): The County shall encourage projects which provide local residents, pedestrian, bicyclist and motorist movement between and among developments on neighborhood streets in a deliberate balance with its efforts to route cut -through traffic away from neighborhoods and to the arterials and collectors designated in this Transportation Element of the Collier County Growth Management Plan. • Staff notes that the local roadways noted in the petition have recently been paved, however they do not have sidewalks or street lighting. PUDA-PL20190000259; ShadowWood Page 6 of 17 Revised: January 9, 2020 Packet Pg. 30 9.A.1 As noted above this request is consistent with the GMP, and the TIS provided with the petition demonstrates that there remains capacity on the adjacent arterial and collector roadways within the five-year planning period. Therefore, Transportation Planning staff has reviewed the petition for compliance with the GMP and the LDC and recommends approval. Conservation and Coastal Management Element (COME): Environmental review staff has found this project to be consistent with the Conservation & Coastal Management Element (COME). No revisions to the environmental portions of the PUD petition are being made. The proposal is consistent with the CCME. STAFF ANALYSIS: Staff has completed a comprehensive evaluation of this land use petition, including the criteria upon which a recommendation must be based, specifically noted in LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5, Planning Commission Recommendation (commonly referred to as the "PUD Findings"), and Section 10.02.08.17, Nature of Requirements of Planning Commission Report (referred to as "Rezone Findings"), which establish the legal basis to support the CCPC's recommendation. An evaluation relative to these subsections is discussed below, under the heading "Zoning Services Analysis." Drainage: The proposed PUD Amendment request is not anticipated to create drainage problems in the area. Stormwater best management practices, treatment, and storage will be addressed through the environmental resource permitting process with the South Florida Water Management District. County staff will also evaluate the project's stormwater management system, calculations, and design criteria at the time of site development plan (SDP) and/or platting (PPL). Environmental Review: Environmental Planning staff has reviewed this petition. The existing preserve areas will not be impacted by the proposed petition. Landscape Review: The buffer types labeled on the Master Plan are consistent with the Land Development Code. The applicant has requested a deviation for the East buffer. See deviation discussion below. Transportation Review: Transportation Planning staff has reviewed the petition for compliance with the GMP and the LDC and recommends approval. Utilities Review: The project lies within the regional potable water service area and the south wastewater service area of the Collier County Water -Sewer District (CCWSD). Water service is readily available via existing infrastructure within adjacent right-of-way, wastewater service will be available via infrastructure to be extended by the Developer to the project boundary, and sufficient water and wastewater treatment capacities are available. Zoning Services Review: In 1982, the property was rezoned from Agriculture District (A-2), Residential Single Family-4 District (RSF-4), and General Commercial District (C-4) to Planned Unit Development (PUD) via Ordinance 82-49 allowing for 569 residential units at a maximum density of 3.6 residential units per gross acre and creating the following five tracts: PUDA-PL20190000259; ShadowWood Page 7 of 17 Revised: January 9, 2020 Packet Pg. 31 9.A.1 • Tracts A & E - 113.3 acres of multifamily residential. • Tract B - 3.7 acres of single family. • Tract C - a private air park district encompassing 37.8 acres that allows an airport runway, airport hangars, airport administration building, and other airport accessory uses. • Tract D - 10.3 acres for commercial uses. In 2008, there was a PUD Amendment memorialized via Ordinance 08-43 increasing the acreage for Tract B to 5.68, increasing the acreage for the private air park district to 46.1 acres, and deleting Tract D. The total number of maximum residential units increased to 574 units at a maximum density of 3.4 units per gross acre. In February 2019, the petitioner applied for an Insubstantial Change to a PUD (PDI) requesting three additional access points to Polly Avenue, Atkins Road and Whitaker Road. In May 2019, the PDI request was converted to a PUDA due to circulation concerns throughout the adjacent neighboring communities, with the addition of 4.35 acres from Tract C into Tract E, and adding single-family residential to Tract E. Currently, Tract E allows for multifamily. Staff analyzed the proposed density and compared it to the densities on the abutting properties of Tract E. As previously mentioned in the Surrounding Land Uses and Zoning portion of the staff report, to the north, the property is zoned Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club PUD (1.43 DU/AC) and Agriculture (A) (1 unit per 5 acres). To the east, the density of Naples Lakes Country Club PUD (1.67 DU/AC) and the LASIP Conservation Area (CFPUD) has no allowance for density. To the south is zoned Residential Single Family-4 District (RSF-4) (4.0 DU/AC). To the west is zoned Agricultural (A) (1 unit per 5 acres). The existing density of ShadowWood PUD is 3.41 (DU/AC) and will remain unaffected by this PUDA petition. Currently, Tract E allows for multi -family residential only. The proposed single- family residential is a less intensive use and would be compatible with the surrounding areas of Tract E. It should be noted that the existing development in the surrounding area is a mixture of single and multi -family and not out of context with regard to community character of the immediate vicinity. Staff analyzed the proposed uses and associated development standards in Tract E within the ShadowWood PUD and compared them with the current uses in the surrounding areas. Currently, the Naples Heritage Golf Club PUD and Naples Lakes Country Club PUD both allow for single and multi -family uses. To the south and west, the RS4-District and Agricultural Districts allows for single-family uses. It should be noted that the proposed additional single-family residential use to Tract E would be a compatible use that are currently developed within these aforementioned zoning districts. The Development Standards Comparison Table shows the development standards for principal and accessory structures proposed in Tract E within ShadowWood PUD and how these standards compare to the surrounding areas. (See Attachment C) In short, the minimum lot area, lot width, floor area, front and rear setbacks, and minimum distance between structures proposed in Tract E within ShadowWood PUD are less than the surrounding areas. The minimum preserve setback is greater in Tract E compared to the other surrounding PUDs and zoning districts. Lastly, the PUDA-PL20190000259; ShadowWood Page S of 17 Revised: January 9, 2020 Packet Pg. 32 9.A.1 minimum side yards and minimum building heights are generally the same among all PUDs and zoning districts. Moreover, it should be noted that similar development standards for residential development have been approved within Collier County for Hacienda Lakes MPUD and Regal Acres RPUD in regard to minimum lot widths, minimum front and rear yards. Russel Square RPUD is also similar with minimum front and rear yards. As such, the proposed development standards in Tract E within ShadowWood PUD are generally compatible with the surrounding areas. The Petitioner/Land Owner holds title to approximately 4.35 acres of land described as "Airpark North" in the legal description of the Deed and survey attendant to this Petition. This Airpark North parcel is a remnant of the commercial component of the original PUD that was deleted and partially aggregated into Tract B through the 2008 PUD Amendment. This remnant parcel located in the northeast corner of the PUD, adjacent and east of the existing aircraft runway, is now proposed to be aggregated into Tract E as depicted on the updated PUD Master Plan. (See Attachment D — Master Plan Redline of proposed aggregation) Staff has no issue with this proposed aggregation into Tract E. CONCURRENT LAND USE APPLICATIONS: There are no concurrent land use applications under review at the present time. PUD FINDINGS: LDC Section 10.02.13.13.5 states that "In support of its recommendation, the CCPC shall make findings as to the PUD Master Plan's compliance with the following criteria in addition to the findings in LDC Section 10.02.08": 1. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. The PUD already receives potable water and wastewater services from the CCWSD. A water distribution main is readily available at Skyway Drive, a wastewater transmission main is readily available along Sunset Boulevard, and there are adequate water and wastewater treatment capacities to serve the proposed PUD as amended. A private wastewater collection system would also be accessible at Skyway Drive provided an easement were granted by Wing South, Inc., the adjacent property owner. 2. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contracts, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Documents submitted with the application, which were reviewed by the County Attorney's Office, demonstrate unified control of Tract E of the PUD. PUDA-PL20190000259; ShadowWood Page 9 of 17 Revised: January 9, 2020 Packet Pg. 33 9.A.1 3. Conformity of the proposed Planned Unit Development with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). County staff has reviewed this petition and has offered an analysis of conformity with the relevant goals, objectives, and policies of the GMP within the GMP Consistency portion of this staff report on page 5. 4. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. As described in the Staff Analysis section of this staff report, the proposed changes to the PUD do not affect the landscaping standards of the original PUD. 5. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. No deviation from the required usable open space is being requested, and compliance would be demonstrated at the time of SDP or PPL. 6. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of ensuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. The roadway infrastructure is sufficient to serve the proposed project, as noted in the Transportation Element consistency review. Operational impacts will be addressed at time of first development order (SDP or Plat), at which time a new TIS will be required to demonstrate turning movements for all site access points. Finally, the project's development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals, including but not limited to any plats and or site development plans, are sought. Moreover, the CCWSD has sufficient treatment capacities for water and wastewater services to the project. Conveyance capacities must be confirmed at the time of development permit application. 7. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. The area has adequate supporting infrastructure, including CCWSD potable water and wastewater mains, to accommodate this project based upon the commitments made by the petitioner, and the fact that adequate public facilities requirements will continuously be addressed when development approvals are sought. 8. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. All future development proposed on the ShadowWood PUD would have to comply to the LDC and other applicable codes. The petitioner is requesting one deviation to the LDC. PUDA-PL20190000259; ShadowWood Revised: January 9, 2020 Page 10 of 17 Packet Pg. 34 9.A.1 Rezone Findings: LDC Subsection 10.02.08.17 states, "When pertaining to the rezoning of land, the report and recommendations to the planning commission to the Board of County Commissioners... shall show that the planning commission has studied and considered proposed change in relation to the following when applicable": 1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Future Land Use Map and the elements of the GMP. Comprehensive Planning staff determined the subject petition is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the (FLUM) and other elements of the GMP. 2. The existing land use pattern. The existing land use pattern (of the abutting properties) is described in the Surrounding Land Use and Zoning section of this staff report. The proposed use would not change the existing land use patterns of the surrounding properties. 3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. The property is currently zoned PUD and would remain as such. 4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. This petition does not propose any change to the boundaries of the PUD. 5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed rezoning necessary. The proposed change is not necessary; however, it is being requested in compliance with the LDC provisions to seek such changes because the petitioner wishes to include the access points, proposed uses and development standards that are specific to the subject parcel. 6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. The proposed PUD Amendment is not anticipated to adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. 7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety. The roadway infrastructure has adequate capacity to serve the proposed project at this time, i.e., GMP consistent at the time of rezoning as evaluated as part of the GMP Transportation PUDA-PL20190000259; ShadowWood Page 11 of 17 Revised: January 9, 2020 Packet Pg. 35 9.A.1 Element consistency review. Operational impacts will be addressed at time of first development order (SDP or Plat). Additionally, the project's development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals are sought. 8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem. The proposed PUD Amendment request is not anticipated to create adverse drainage impacts in the area; provided stormwater best management practices, treatment, and storage on this project are addressed through Environmental Resource Permitting (ERP) with the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD). County staff will evaluate the project's stormwater management system, calculations, and design criteria at the time of SDP and/or PPL. 9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas. It is not anticipated the changes proposed to this PUD Amendment would seriously reduce light or air to the adjacent areas. 10. Whether the proposed change will adversely affect property values in the adjacent areas. This is a subjective determination based upon anticipated results, which may be internal or external to the subject property. Property valuation is affected by a host of factors including zoning; however, zoning by itself may or may not affect values, since value determination is driven by market value. 11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. The addition of three access points to provide ingress and egress to Tract E to Polly Avenue, Atkins Road and Whitaker Road, the addition of single family residential with associated development standards, and the aggregation of 4.35 acres from Tract C into Tract E is not anticipated to serve as a deterrent to the improvement of the adjacent property. 12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasting with the public welfare. If the proposed development complies with the GMP through the proposed amendment, then that constitutes a public policy statement supporting zoning actions when they are consistent with said Comprehensive Plan. In light of this fact, the proposed change does not constitute a grant of special privilege. Consistency with the FLUE is further determined to be a public welfare relationship because actions consistent with plans are in the public interest. PUDA-PL20190000259; ShadowWood Revised: January 9, 2020 Page 12 of 17 Packet Pg. 36 9.A.1 13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning. The subject property can be used in accordance with existing zoning; however, the proposed uses cannot be achieved without amending the PUD. 14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the County. It is staff's opinion that the proposed uses, associated development standards, and developer commitments will ensure that the project is not out of scale with the needs of the community. 15. Whether is it impossible to find other adequate sites in the County for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. The petition was reviewed for compliance with the GMP and the LDC, and staff does not specifically review other sites in conjunction with a specific petition. 16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration, which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. Any development anticipated by the PUD Document would require considerable site alteration, and this project will undergo extensive evaluation relative to all federal, state, and local development regulations during the SDP and/or platting processes, and again later as part of the building permit process. 17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance, as amended. The project will have to meet all applicable criteria set forth in LDC Section 6.02.00 regarding Adequate Public Facilities (APF), and the project will need to be consistent with all applicable goals and objectives of the GMP regarding adequate public facilities, except as may be exempt by federal regulations. This petition has been reviewed by County staff responsible for jurisdictional elements of the GMP as part of the amendment process, and those staff persons have concluded that no Level of Service will be adversely impacted with the commitments contained in the PUD Document. The concurrency review for APF is determined at the time of SDP review. The activity proposed by this amendment will have no impact on public facility adequacy in regard to utilities. 18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare. It is to be determined at the public hearings PUDA-PL20190000259; ShadowWood Revised: January 9, 2020 Page 13 of 17 Packet Pg. 37 9.A.1 DEVIATION DISCUSSION: The PUD was approved via Ordinance 82-49 without any deviations. The petitioner is now seeking to add one deviation, and this deviation has been directly extracted from the proposed PUD ordinance, itemized in Section — Proposed Ordinance). The petitioner's justification and staff analysis/recommendation for this deviation are listed below. Deviation #1: (Buffer Requirements) "Deviation 1 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.06.02.A, applicability of buffer requirements, which requires a landscape buffer along the eastern PUD boundary associated with the private airstrip, to allow no buffer. Given the adjacent, offsite preserve abutting the easterly PUD boundary, no landscape buffer is required." Petitioners Justification: Tract C separates the subject Tract E from the eastern PUD boundary and Tract C is the location of the existing private airstrip. The eastern PUD boundary within Tract C does not have a buffer as it was permitted and developed in the 1980's. No buffer is needed along the eastern PUD boundary given the platted conservation easements lying east of the subject ShadowWood PUD. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: The existing Master Plan does not label the perimeter buffers as required by the current Administrative Code. Currently there is no buffer provided along the eastern boundary. The northern 830 feet of the eastern boundary abuts LASIP Conservation Area CFPUD. The remainder of the eastern buffer abuts an area designated as preserve on the Naples Lakes Country Club PUD Master Plan. Given that the eastern boundary of the subject PUD has existed in its current condition without a buffer and is abutting existing conservation areas, staff sees no detrimental effect if this deviation request is approved. Zoning staff recommends APPROVAL of this deviation, finding that in compliance with LDC Section 10.02.13.A.3, the petitioner has demonstrated that "the element may be waived without a detrimental effect on the health, safety and welfare of the community," and LDC Section 10.02.13.13.5.11, the petitioner has demonstrated that the deviation is "justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations." MAY 7, 2019 NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM): It should be noted at the time this NIM was held this petition was being processed as an Insubstantial Change to a PUD (PDI). Subsequent to this NIM, Growth Management Department (GMD) staff made the determination that this petition be converted to a PUDA based on the following. Upon completion of the multifamily residential in Tract E within the ShadowWood PUD, there is the perception among the neighborhood residents of additional trips and traffic on the following roads: Polly Ave, Whitaker Road, and Adkins Ave. These additional trips were not contemplated in the PUDs original adoption along these local roads. There was considerable opposition at this NIM on this issue. It is staff opinion that this petition be categorized under LDC Section 10.02.13(E)(1)(e), "A substantial increase in the impacts of the development which may include but are not limited to increases in traffic generation; changes in traffic circulation; or PUDA-PL20190000259; ShadowWood Page 14 of 17 Revised: January 9, 2020 Packet Pg. 38 9.A.1 impacts on other public facilities." As such, this is substantial and was deemed a PUDA. Furthermore, it was discussed at this NIM that 59 addresses were left out of the property owner list given to them by the County. To rectify this situation, the agent had to request another updated property owner list, and that list included the 59 addresses that were originally left out. As a result, the agent had to re -advertise and hold a second NIM on May 28, 2019. The applicant conducted the NIM on May 7, 2019, at Mayflower Congregational United Church of Christ at 2900 County Barn Road. The meeting commenced at approximately 5:35 p.m. and ended at 6:20 p.m. The applicant's agent explained the request for the proposed PDI. Bill Barton, representative of the property owner, gave a presentation and answered questions from attendees. There was a review of the history of the PUD and gave a description of the PDI petition and the need for the requested access points to the property. After the presentation of the petition ended, the meeting was opened to questions and answers to the public in which many issues and concerns were discussed such as: • Master plan correction on the location of Atkins Ave • Access through the south being on private roadways and access through the preserve, Russel Square, Tamarac, and Naples Lakes and County preserve park • Alternative access from the north and east are not available • Access at Atkins conflicts with LASIP swale and may need to be culverted • Atkins, Whitaker, Sunset, and Polly are public, not private roads. Issues on which roads will be getting paved and that these can't handle the additional traffic • Offsite sewage treatment • Utilities availability and water lines that residents could tap into • Notification letter were not sent to all residents • Construction timeline of the future development • Concerns and issues on the PDI requirement of the County to grant access and the PDI process versus the PUDA process • Issues concerning bike paths, speed bumps, street lights, children safety, sidewalks that children can walk on going home, middle turn lane on Whitaker Road, and stop signs at Whitaker and Sunset intersection • Review of the original zoning and the 2008 zoning amendment of the PUD The meeting ended around 6:20 p.m. with an announcement that a second NIM would be tentatively scheduled for May 28 at the same location at the same time to be confirmed later. A copy of the NIM materials are included in Attachment F. MAY 28, 2019 NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM): The applicant conducted the second NIM on May 28, 2019, at Mayflower Congregational United Church of Christ at 2900 County Barn Road. The meeting commenced at approximately 5:33 p.m. and ended at 6:04 p.m. The applicant's agent explained the request for the proposed PUDA, the reasoning on the conversion of the petition from a PDI into a PUDA, and the requirement of the second NIM based on the omission of 59 addresses from the property owner list from the first NIM held on May 7, 2019. Bill Barton, representative of the property owner, gave a presentation and answered questions from attendees. There was a review of the history of the PUD and gave a PUDA-PL20190000259; ShadowWood Page 15 of 17 Revised: January 9, 2020 Packet Pg. 39 9.A.1 description of the PUDA petition. Mr. Barton provided an overview of the requested access points into the northern half of the PUD off of Polly Ave, Whitaker Road, and Adkins Ave, the addition of 4.35 acres to be added to Tract E, and the addition of single family residential to Tract E. After the presentation of the petition ended, the meeting was opened to questions and answers to the public in which many issues and concerns were discussed such as: • Traffic and the number of vehicles • Child safety • Wingsouth preventing access from Rattlesnake to the northern portion of PUD and that SD Corporation does not have access to the northern portion of PUD. Wingsouth is not part of the PUD. • Polly Ave is not paved • Density at the three access points • The airport was existing prior to the 1982 adoption of the PUD • Discussions with Conservation Collier is a concern • 4.35 acres of property to be added to Tract E (commitment) • Single-family land use added to Tract E (commitment) The meeting ended around 6:04 p.m. A copy of the NIM materials are included in Attachment F. ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL (EAC) RECOMMENDATION: This project does not require Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) review, as this project did not meet the EAC scope of land development project reviews as identified in Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Codes of Laws and Ordinances. COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The County Attorney's Office reviewed this staff report on January 9, 2020. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the CCPC forward this petition to the Board with a recommendation of approval. Attachments: A) Proposed Ordinance B) FLUE Consistency Review C) Development Standards Comparison Table D) Acreage aggregation into Tract E E) Opposition Letters F) Application/Backup Materials PUDA-PL20190000259; ShadowWood Revised: January 9, 2020 Page 16 of 17 Packet Pg. 40 9.A.1 PREPARED BY: TIMOTHY F , AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER ZONING DIVISION - ZONING SERVICES SECTION REVIEWED BY: 1!S 1p RAYMO V, BELLOWS, ZON MANAGER ZONING DIVISION - ZONING SERVICES SECTION APPROVED BY: JAMES FRENCH, DEPUTY DEPARTMENT HEAD GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT PUDA-PL20190000259; ShadowWood Revised: January 9, 2020 1-2- n DATE DATE /-9-20;10 DATE Page 17 of 17 Packet Pg. 41 9.A.2 ORDINANCE NO.20- AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 82-49, AS AMENDED, THE SHADOWWOOD PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD), TO REDESIGNATE 4f ACRES OF LAND FROM TRACT C, PRIVATE AIR PARK DISTRICT, TO TRACT E, RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT; BY ADDING THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR TRACT E; BY AMENDING THE MASTER PLAN TO ADD 3 ACCESS POINTS TO PROVIDE INGRESS AND EGRESS TO TRACT E INCLUDING ACCESS TO POLLY AVENUE, ATKINS ROAD AND WHITAKER ROAD; BY REMOVING A REQUIREMENT THAT ALL ACCESS ROADS TO THE PUD ARE PRIVATE ROADS; AND BY REVISING DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY CONSISTING OF 77.99f ACRES IS PART OF THE 168.1 ACRE PUD LOCATED AT WING SOUTH AIR PARK, EAST OF SANTA BARBARA BOULEVARD BETWEEN DAVIS BOULEVARD AND RATTLESNAKE -HAMMOCK ROAD, IN SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. [PL20190000259] WHEREAS, on July 13, 1982, the Board of County Commissioners approved Ordinance No. 82-49, which created the ShadowWood Planned Unit Development ("MPUD"); and WHEREAS, the PUD was subsequently amended by Ordinance No. 08-43; and WHEREAS, SD Corporation of Naples, Inc., represented by Christopher Hagan, PE of Hagan Engineering, LLC and Clyde Quinby of Clyde C. Quinby Realty, Inc., petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to amend the PUD. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: SECTION ONE: Zoning Classification. The PUD Document attached to Ordinance No. 82-49, as amended, is hereby amended in accordance with the revised PUD Document, attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated by reference herein. [ 19-CPS-01866/ 1527066/11167 ShadowWood PUDA \ PL20190000259 Page 1 of 2 3/4/20 0 a 0 3 3 0 M Packet Pg. 42 SECTION TWO: Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective upon fling with the Department of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by super -majority vote of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this ATTEST: CRSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK LI-A Deputy Clerk Approved as to form and legality: Ci Heidi Ashton-Cicko Managing Assistant County Attorney Attachments: Exhibit A - PUD Document [ 19-CPS-01866/1527066/1 1167 ShadowWood PUDA \ PL20190000259 Page 2 of 2 3/4/20 day of , 2020. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Burt L. Saunders, Chairman a 0 a 0 0 3 0 t U) Packet Pg. 43 9.A.2 SHADOWWOOD PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT Located in Section 16 Township 50 South, Range 26 East PREPARED BY: WILSON, MILLER, BARTON, SOLL & PEEK, INC. 1383 Airport Road North Naples, FL 33924 REVISED BY: Q. GRADY MINOR & ASSOCIATES 3800 Via Del Rey Bonita Springs, FL 34134 REVISED BY: HAGAN ENGINEERING 1250 N. Tamiami Trail, Ste. 203B Naples, FL 34102 PL 20190000259 Shadowwood PUDA_2/28/20 Words stre-k thfeti are deleted; words underlined are added. Packet Pg. 44 9.A.2 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE SECTION I a STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE 1-2 a SECTION II ° 3 0 STATEMENT OF INTENT 3 SECTION III PROPERTY OWNERSHIP AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION 4 SECTION IV GENERAL DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS 5 — 143 TRACTS A & E — TAT Tr T-1 F n N41 v RESIDENTIAL TRACT B — SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TRACT C — PRIVATE AIR PARK DISTRICT SECTION V GENERAL DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS 1-4 - 17 SECTION VI DEVIATIONS 18 PL 20190000259 Shadowwood PUDA_2/28/20 Words struek through are deleted; words underlined are added. Packet Pg. 45 9.A.2 SECTION I STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE The purpose of this section is to express the intent of The Rookery, Ltd., 706 5th Avenue South, Naples, Florida to develop ±168.1 acres of land located in Section 16, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. The name of this proposal development shall hence forth be known as ShadowWood, The development of ShadowWood as a Planned Unit Development will be in compliance with the planning goals and objectives of Collier County as set forth in the Comprehensive Plan. The residential development with associated recreational and private aviational facilities will be consistent with the growth policies and land development regulations of the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element and other applicable documents for the following reasons. 1. The subject property has the necessary rating points to determine availability of adequate community facilities and services. 2. The project development is compatible with and complimentary to the surrounding land uses. 3. The subject property will provide a vegetative buffer between the property and Rattlesnake Hammock Road, the surrounding vacant lands, and the single family residential units to the west. 4. The development shall consist primarily of multi -family residential clusters and shall thereby provide more common open space. 5. The development shall utilize natural systems for water management such as the cypress, willow, lower wetland areas, and natural drainage courses. 6. The development shall promote the maintenance of the residential neighborhood and be aesthetically pleasing and functionally efficient. -1- PL 20190000259 Shadowwood PUDA_2/28/20 Words stf+tsleugk are deleted; words underlined are added. Packet Pg. 46 9.A.2 7. The number of egress and ingress points shall be limited to minimize the impact upon the traffic flow along Rattlesnake Hammock Road. The development is complimentary to and consistent with the Collier County Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element. 9. The land may be used more efficiently, and made more desirable resulting in a smaller network of utilities and streets with consequent lower construction and future maintenance costs. 10. Through proper planning and good uniform development control, the development shall protect property values and meet the general public welfare and safety of the citizens of Collier County. 11. The project will enable and encourage compatibility with the natural amenities of the environmental as well as preserve and enhance present advantages. 12. The application of the development plan will permit flexibility and feature amenities and excellence in the form of variations in siting, mixed land uses and varied dwelling types, as well as adaptation to and conservation of the topography and other natural characteristics of the land. 13. With proper uniform quality large scale development, the project may best serve the public interest with alternate mixed land uses. -2- PL 20190000259 Shadowwood PUDA_2/28/20 Words stfusk thfough are deleted; words underlined are added. Packet Pg. 47 9.A.2 SECTION II STATEMENT OF INTENT It is the property owner's intention to continue the development of a single and multi -family residential project with recreational, commercial, and aviational facilities, and other support facilities required of a development surrounding a private air park community. The project was initiated in the early 1970's with the development of single family residential condominium lots with common facilities. As part of the same property, it is the intent of The Rookery, Ltd. to continue to develop a condominium complex consisting of cluster villages; multi -family residential units; single family residential lots; and varied dwelling unit types. The units shall be centered around major points such as the air park, lakes, pine and cypress trees, common open space, and areas of unique vegetation. There may be recreational benefits consisting of jogging trails, para courses, private swimming pools, neighborhood parks, tennis courts, and the unique feature of a private airpark. Residents of this project shall be afforded the opportunity to own private airplanes and a single family residential or condominium unit with the conveniences of aviational, recreational, and commercial services among a natural scenic environmental setting. The residential development of low-rise multi -family and single family units shall demonstrate a quality way of life for its residents that will be eminently desirable, esthetically pleasing, and environmentally sound. -3- PL 20190000259 Shadowwood PUDA_2/28/20 Words strueli through are deleted; words underlined are added. Packet Pg. 48 9.A.2 SECTION III PROPERTY OWNERSHIP AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION 3. L PROPERTY OWNERSHIP: The subject property is currently under the control of The Rookery, Ltd. 706 5th Avenue South, Naples, Florida 33940. 3.2. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: The subject property is described as follows: The east 1 /2 of the east 1 /2 and; the north 1 /2 of the northwest 1 /4 of the northeast 1 /4; the southeast 1 /4 of the northwest 1 /4 of the northeast 1 /4 and; all being in Section 16, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. ALSO LESS the south fifty (50) feet for road right-of-way and any easement right-of-way of public record. LESS WING SOUTH AIR PARK PRIVATE VILLAS UNIT 1, a Condominium, according to the Declaration of Condominium recorded in Official Record Book 476, pages 304 to 350, inclusive, Public Records of Collier County, Florida, as amended. -4- PL 20190000259 Shadowwood PUDA_2/28/20 Words strusk thfetigh are deleted; words underlined are added. Packet Pg. 49 9.A.2 SECTION IV GENERAL DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS 4.1. PURPOSE: The purpose of this Section is to set forth the regulations for development of the property identified on the Master Development Plan. It is the intent of the project sponsor to develop multi -family and single family residences in a low profile silhouette with ample common open space associated with the conveniences of aviational, recreational, and commercial services. 4.2. PROJECT PLAN AND LAND USE TRACTS: For the purposes of gross residential land use area, the subject property is ±168.1 acres. The project plan including street layout and land uses is illustrated in Exhibit "B", PUD Master Plan. The project shall consist of five four land use tracts of general area and configuration as shown in Exhibit "B". Tracts A & E-Mufti family Residential f1 13.3 117.65 Acres Tracts B - Single Family Residential ± 5.68 Acres Tract C - Private Air Park District ± 464 41.78 Acres Entrance Drive f 3.0 Acres Total Area ± 168.09 1 Acres Assuming favorable economic and market conditions, it is the project sponsor's intent to complete development of the property within six years. The total maximum residential units will be 574 units at a maximum density of 3.4 units per gross acre. -5- PL 20190000259 Shadowwood PUDA_2/28/20 Words S4feek thfetigh are deleted; words underlined are added. Packet Pg. 50 9.A.2 4.3 TRACTS A & E SINGLE FAN41h RESIDENTIAL A. Purpose: The purpose of this section is to indicate the land regulations for the areas a designated on PUD Master Plan as Tracts A and E, Multi Family Residential. a B. Tract A - Permitted Uses and Structures: o 0 No buildings or structures, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land c used, in whole or part, for other than the following: 1. Permitted Principal Uses and Structures: r a. Multi -Family Residences. b. Common open space, recreational facilities and water management facilities. C. Nine hole golf course with the typical facilities of a private country club. 2. Permitted Accessory Uses and Structures: a. Customary accessory uses and structures. b. Signs as permitted at time of permit application. C. Airplane hangers and tie downs. d. Private road, pedestrian and bicycle paths, boardwalks and cross- walks, jogging and nature appreciation trails, or other similar facilities constructed for purposes of access to or passage through the common areas. e. Lawn or golf course maintenance shop and equipment storage. !r'� PL 20190000259 Shadowwood PUDA_2/28/20 Words stmsk Afetigh are deleted; words underlined are added. Packet Pg. 51 9.A.2 C. Tract E — Permitted Uses and Structures: No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following_ 1. Permitted Principal Uses and Structures: a. Single family detached dwellings, b. Zero lot line, detached dwellings; C. Two-family and duplex dwellings; d. Single family attached dwellings, (including townhouses intended for fee simple conveyance including the platted lot associated with the residence; e. Multi -family dwellings; f. Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the BZA by the process outlined in the LDC. 2. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including but not limited to: a. Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with principal uses permitted in this land use tract, including swimming pools spas, docks, boat houses, and screen enclosures recreational facilities designed to serve the development; b. Model homes and model home centers including offices for project administration, construction, sales and marketing; C. Recreational facilities and structures to serve the PUD. includin clubhouses, health and fitness facilities, pools meeting rooms community buildings, boardwalks, playgrounds, playfields tennis courts, and similar uses intended to exclusively serve the residents of the PUD and their guests. -7- a ON a PL 20190000259 Shadowwood PUDA_2/28/20 Words stmek thr-ough are deleted; words underlined are added. Packet Pg. 52 9.A.2 GD. Tracts A and E - Maximum Dwelling Units: A maximum of 558 residential dwelling units. DE. Tract A — Minimum Yard Requirements for Principal Structures: 1. Depth from property boundary line (35) feet. 2. Depth from edge of all private paved roads (25) feet. 3. Minimum distance between any two (2) principal structures on the same parcel shall be fifteen (15) feet. 4. Minimum distance between a development phase, or condominium tract line and any principal structure shall be seven and one-half (7.5) feet. EF. Tract A — Minimum Yard Requirements for Accessory Structures: As required by the Collier County zoning Ordinance. EG. Tract A — Minimum Floor Area of Principal Structures: 900 Square feet for each dwelling unit. FAH. Tract A — Maximum Height of Principal Structure: Three (3) living stories above one story of parking with a maximum height of forty- five (45) feet. In order to comply with the minimum flood elevation requirements, the maximum height of a structure shall be measured from the minimum base flood elevation required by the Flood Elevation Ordinance. PL 20190000259 Shadowwood PUDA_2/28/20 Words stfttsk thfough are deleted; words underlined are added. Packet Pg. 53 9.A.2 Tract E Development Standards: TABLE I — TRACT E RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS SINGLE- FAMILY DETACHED SINGLE- FAMILY ATTACHED & SINGLE- FAMILY ZERO LOT LINE TOWNHOMES MULTI- FAMILY DWELLING AMENITIES PRINCIPAL STRUCTURES Min. Lot Area 1,6 00 sf 1,6 00 sf 1,100 SF 1 acre N/A Min. Lot Width 32' 32' 18' 150' N/A Min. Front Yard 12' (1) 23' SS 12' 1 23' S 12, (1) 20', or '/z BH, 15' whichever is greater. Min. Side Yard 5' (2) 0' or 10' (2) 0' or 5 (2)(4) 1/2/ BH (4) 5', or BH, whichever is greater. Min. Rear Yard 5', or 20' from alley (3) 5'. or 20' from 5', or 20' from alley 3 15' or BH, 5', or/2BH, whichever is greater. alley 3 whichever is greater. Min. Distance between structures 10, 10' 10, '/2 SBH '/2 SBH Max. Zoned Bldg. Height 35' 35' 35' 35' 35' Min. Floor Area 1000 sf 1000 sf 900 sf 900 sf N/A Max. Actual Bldg. Height 40' 40' 40' 40' 40' Preserve Setback 25' 25' 25' 25' 25' ACCESSORY STRUCTURES Min. Front Yard SPS SPS SPS SPS 12' Min. Side Yard SPS SPS SPS SPS SPS Min. Rear Yard 5' SPS SPS 5' SPS Preserve Setback 10' 10, 10, 10, 10, Max. Zoned Bldg. Height SPS SPS SPS SPS SPS Max. Actual Bldg. Height SPS SPS SPS SPS SPS SPS: Same as Principal Structure BH: Building Heigh SBH: Sum of Building Heights N/A: Not Applicable In a a 0 0 3 0 t El r Q PL 20190000259 Shadowwood PUDA_2/28/20 Words stf�usk th etigh are deleted; words underlined are added. Packet Pg. 54 9.A.2 Notes: (1): Front yard setbacks shall be measured from Right -Of -Way line and shall allow a 2-foot separation from the structure to the Public Utility Easement. (2): If side yard setback is 0 feet on one side, the other side yard shall be 10 feet for a total building separation of 10 feet. (3): Alley setbacks shall be measured from the easement line. Parking may be accessed from alley the rear of the propegy provided there is a 5-foot clearance from the vehicle to the edge of pavement. (4): Multi -family structures may have terraced setbacks. Terraced setbacks shall be measured from the ground floor exterior wall, as long as a minimum 15-foot building wall setback is provided as depicted in Figure 1, below. (5) Garages shall be located a minimum of 23 feet from the back of the sidewalk except for side load garages, wherein a parking area 23 feet in depth shall be provided to avoid vehicles from being parked across a portion or all of the referenced sidewalk. (6) Amenities must maintain a 100-foot (100') separation from all external boundaries of Tract E. 0 Fi ure 1 Terraced Setbacks -10- i IMI V C R C L 0 cn 0 Q 0 N Gi C E L V fC r r Q r-+ C 0 E t V R a PL 20190000259 Shadowwood PUDA_2/28/20 Words str#ek-thr-augk are deleted; words underlined are added. Packet Pg. 55 9.A.2 I4J. Minimum Off -Street Parking: Two (2) parking spaces per residential unit with a minimum of 1.5 parking spaces/unit paved and .5 parking space/unit reserved for paving at a time deemed to be appropriate by the County. IK. Limitation On Signs: As permitted by the zoning ordinance in effect at time of application for building permit. 4.4. TRACT B: SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL A. Purpose: The purpose of this section is to set forth the development plan and land regulations for the areas designated on PUD Master Plan as Tract B, Single Family Residential. B. Permitted Uses and Structures: No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or part, for other than the following: Permitted Principal Uses and Structures: a. Single Family Residences. b. Common open space & water management facilities. 2. Permitted Accessory Uses and Structures: a. Customary accessory uses and structures. b. Recreational uses and facilities. C. Airplane hangars or tie downs. C. Maximum Dwelling Units: A maximum of 16 residential dwelling units may be constructed. D. Minimum Yard Requirements: 1. Front Yard - 25 feet 2. Side Yard - 7.5 feet 3. Rear Yard - 25 feet 4. Accessory structure as required by current zoning ordinance. -11- PL 20190000259 Shadowwood PUDA_2/28/20 Words stmek Afetigh are deleted; words underlined are added. Packet Pg. 56 9.A.2 E. Minimum Lot Width: 100 feet. F. Minimum Lot Area: 12,000 square feet. G. Minimum floor Area of Principal Structure: 1,200 square feet exclusive of patio, garage, and/or airplane hanger. H. Maximum Height of Principal Structures: Three (3) stories above the finish grade of lot or from the minimum base flood elevation required by the flood elevation ordinance. I. Off -Street Parking Requirements: Two (2) spaces, at least one of which shall be located within the permitted building area. J. Landscaping and Buffer: All buildings, enclosures, or other structures constructed for purposes of maintenance, shall have appropriate screening and landscaping. 4.5. TRACT C: PRIVATE AIR PARK DISTRICT: A. Purpose: The purpose of this section is to indicate the development plan and land regulations for the areas designated on the PUD Master Plan as Tract "C", Private Air Park District. B. Development Plan: l . The primary purpose of this Tract will be to provide the necessary aviational support facilities to accommodate a private airport. These areas shall be utilized only in accordance with the provisions necessary to maintain and operate the private air park. 2. Except in areas to be used for water impoundment and principal or accessory use areas, all natural trees and other vegetation as buffer shall be protected and preserved so long as such plant life shall not interfere with the control of airspace within 700 feet from the end of the primary runway surface. -12- PL 20190000259 Shadowwood PUDA_2/28/20 Words stFuek thfou are deleted; words underlined are added. a 0 a 0 0 3 0 M M T T Packet Pg. 57 9.A.2 C. Uses Permitted: No building or structure or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: 1. Permitted Principal Uses and Structures: a. Airport runway and administration building. b. Airport hangers, T-hangers, and Airplane tie downs. c. Aviational fueling and service shop. d. Aviational maintenance and service shop. e. Water management facilities. f. Any other similar aviational support facilities that may be necessary or compatible with the operations of a private air park. 2. Permitted Accessory Uses and Structures: a. Accessory uses customarily associated with the uses permitted in this district. b. Lawn or golf course maintenance shop and equipment storage. c. Signs as permitted at time of permit application. D. Minimum Yard Requirements: l . Setback from edge of primary runway surface - 100 feet. 2. Other structures must conform with setbacks of the abutting properties land use regulations; however, they may not be placed within fifty (50) feet of the primary runway surface. E. Control of Airspace: The control of the airspace within 700 feet from the ends of the primary runway surface shall be adhered to by the project sponsor. The control shall be of such a nature as to prevent any airport hazards from being grown, erected, or otherwise placed within a glide path of 20:1 from the ends of the primary runway surface. -13- PL 20190000259 Shadowwood PUDA_2/28/20 Words stfusk thfougk are deleted; words underlined are added. Packet Pg. 58 9.A.2 SECTION V GENERAL DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS 5.1 PURPOSE: The purpose of this Section is to set forth the standards for development of the project 5.2 P.U.D. MASTER PLAN: A. The PUD Master Plan is an illustrative preliminary development plan. B. The design criteria and layout illustrated on the Master Plan shall be understood as flexible so that, the final design may satisfy the project and comply with all applicable requirements. C. All necessary easements, dedications, or other instruments shall be granted to insure the continued operation and maintenance of all service utilities. D. Minor design changes shall be permitted subject to staff approval. E. Overall site design shall be harmonious in terms of landscaping, enclosure of structure, locations of all improved facilities, and location and treatment of buffer areas. t e nlhll bthth . n the 1\ rite neighbor -hood, o read sae e no read as sT GF. Areas illustrated as "lakes" shall be constructed lakes, or upon approval, parts thereof may be green areas in which as much natural foliage as practical shall be preserved. Such areas, lakes and/or natural green areas, shall be of general area and configuration as shown on the Master Plan. -14- PL 20190000259 Shadowwood PUDA_2/28/20 Words stmek thfeugh are deleted; words underlined are added. Packet Pg. 59 9.A.2 GI4. Wetland subzones "A-1, A-2, A-3, B-4-, C-1, E-1 and E-2" (Wilson, Miller, Barton, Soll & Peek, Inc. Drawing File No. RZ-59, Sheet 2 of 2), are illustrative sub zones and will be conserved as much as practicable as storm water management/open space areas. These areas will be flagged for protection, prior to development. 51 5.4. WATER MANAGEMENT: A. Detailed water management construction plans shall be submitted to and approved by the County Engineer prior to commencement of any construction. B. Appropriate easements to be granted to Collier County for maintenance of perimeter swale system. 5.5. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL: Such arrangement and agreements as necessary shall be made with an approved solid waste disposal service to provide for solid waste collection service to all areas of the project. 5.6 RECREATION FACILITIES A minimum of twee two swimming pools and twee one tennisiball courts shall be constructed by the project sponsor. Additional recreational facilities may be constructed by the future residents of this project. 5.7 TRAFFIC A. The project sponsor will provide to the appropriate governmental agency, an additional right-of-way of 17.5 feet along the south property boundary line for future road widening of Rattlesnake Hammock Road. B. The project sponsor agrees to construct a right and left turn storage lande on Rattlesnake Hammock Road for traffic entering ShadowWood and to pay for his proportionate share of the costs of a traffic signal at the project entrance when required by the appropriate governmental agency. C. A sidewalk shall be constructed on one side of the main entrance road into the project. -15- PL 20190000259 5hadowwood PUDA_2/28/20 Words stmek thfough are deleted; words underlined are added. Packet Pg. 60 9.A.2 D. The maximum total trip generation for Tract E shall not exceed 187 two-way PM peak hour trips based on the use codes in the ITE Manual on trip generation rates in effect at the time of application for SDP/SDPA or subdivision plat approval. E. Prior to developer turnover to a homeowner's or condominium association. the developer shall pay to County up to $60,000 for the County's design costs for traffic calming_ initiated by the owner's under the Collier County Neighborhood Traffic Management Program and County's installation costs, or up to $60,000 for County -initiated traffic calming including but not limited to striping, signagg and speed tables on any of the roadways used to access Santa Barbara. This commitment will terminate upon issuance of the 273th certificate of occupancy for Tract E if no traffic calming, measures have been initiated by owners in the neighborhood or by County. 5.8 UTILITIES A. A central water supply system shall be made available to all areas of the project. The water supply source for the project shall be the County system. B. All areas of the project shall be served by a central wastewater collection system and by an existing off -site wastewater treatment plant. The existing plant shall be expanded as may be needed to meet the anticipated demands. Plans and D.E.R. permit applications for the sewage treatment plant shall be submitted to the Utility Division. C. The project sponsor agrees to comply with all applicable County laws and ordinances governing utility provisions and facilities. D. Telephone, power and T.V. cable service shall be made available to all residential areas. All such utility lines shall be installed underground. E. The developer of Tract E shall provide water main stub -outs at anv proiect vehicular connection to the public roadway system. The required stub -outs shall be a minimum size of 8 inches, and shall be located within the road right-of-way, and shall be established within a County Utility Easement (CUE) to be dedicated to the Collier County Water -Sewer District (District). The CUEs shall be shown on any final subdivision plat and shall be conveyed in accordance with the Collier County Utilities Standards and Procedures Ordinance (Ord. 04-31 as amended) at no cost to the County or District, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances, prior to or concurrent with preliminary acceptance of utilities. -16- PL 20190000259 Shadowwood PUDA_2/28/20 Words stfuek-tkreagk are deleted; words underlined are added. Packet Pg. 61 9.A.2 5_9 ENVIRONMENTAL A. A listed species survey shall be included in submittal materials associated with the next occurrin development evelopment order request (i.e.: PPL or SDP) for Tract E. The required survey must be less than 12 months old for listed species known to inhabit biological communities similar to those found on site (LDC 3.04.00). The survey shall be conducted in accordance with the guidelines or recommendations of the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FFWCC) and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). -17- PL 20190000259 Shadowwood PUDA_2/28/20 Words stftiekthr-eugh are deleted; words underlined are added. Packet Pg. 62 9.A.2 SF,CTTON VI DEVIATIONS FROM THE LDC Deviation #1 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.06.02.A.,Applicablity of buffer requirements, which requires a landscape buffer along the eastern PUD boundary associated with the private airstrip, to allow no buffer. Given the adjacent, offsite preserve abutting the easterly PUD boundary, no landscape buffer is required. -18- PL 20190000259 Shadowwood PUDA_2/28/20 Words st-izusk thr-eugh are deleted; words underlined are added. Packet Pg. 63 PUD > WATERFORD Z ESTATES D W D ZJ 03 D D W r 0 � A C 0 � D __,m > T m0 to A NORTH () 0 800 SCALE IN FEET A 10MIN. TYPE "A" FOR SF 15' MIN. TYPE "B" FOR MF - A 10' MIN. TYPE "D" BUFFER RPUDI I A ONYX LEGEND — — EXISTING SIDEWALK REC: RECREATION AREA P: PRESERVE (REF:LDC 3.05.07.B) 1O PUD DEVIATION PRESERVE SETBACKS PRINCIPAL STRUCTURES 2SFEET ACCESSORY STRUCTURES 10FEET SHADOWWOOD SUBDIVISIONS PB PAGE SHADOWWOOD 19 78-79 7 SHADOWWOOD VILLAS 23 86-87 31 REPLAT OF SHADOWWOOD PARK 25 9S-99 41 WING SOUTH AIRPARK EXT 61 20-21 PUD NAPLES HERITAGE GOLF AND COUNTRY CLUB 2324' 660 10' MIN. TYPE "A" FOR SF 15' MIN. TYPE "B" FOR MF o' 623 TRACT E Ingress/Egr (T6D at SDP/PPL) 10' MIN. TYPE "A" FOR SF 15' MIN. TYPE "B" FOR MF ----6-- ST PARCEL 16A 6.06 ACRES ST 660 ---- Z NON ST m 10' MIN. TYPE "A" FOR SF 15' MIN. TYPE "B" FOR MF DESCRIPTION ACREAGE DWELLING UNITS TRACTA- RESIDENTIAL 39.671 194 TRACTE- RESIDENTIAL 77.98± 364 TRACT B 5.68± 16 TRACT C-SIN GLE-FAMILY 41.78± N/A RESIDENTIAL ENTRANCE DRIVE 3.00± N/A TOTALS 168.1± 574 GROSSDENSITY 3.41UNITS/ACRE PRESERVE 3.8 ACRES± PER RZ-59 REVISIONS 9/2/19 REVISED PER RAI #3 10/23/19 REVISED PER RAI #4 10/28/19 REVISED PER ENVIR. STAFF 11/25/19 REVISED PER PLANNING STAFF 11/27/19 REV. PER LANDSCAPE REVIEW 12/02/19 REV. PER LANDSCAPE REVIEW 1/17120 REV. PER COUNTY PLANNER 0 9.A.2 PUD HOMES OF AISLANDIA ----i6 s m 15 AIRPARK NORTH CFPUD a LASIP 0 CONSERVATION AREA d O O N O P (2 AC.±) L+ O 10' MIN. TYPE "A" FOR SF 1'___F_15' t MIN. TYPE "B" FOR MF (q �O o� 132' 500' 16' 193 0 RSF-4 15' MIN. TYPE "B" BUFFER 15' MIN. TYPE "B" BUFFER _1�1 15' MIN. TYPE "B"_ BUFFER TRACT C RSF-4 WING SOUTH AIRPARK VILLAS 3 3 31 PARKER$ HAMMOCK ROAD �� 2 L REC� RSF-3 z m o P LAKE PARKERS TRACT A RM F-6 20' MIN. TYPE "D" L2 BUFFER RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK RD PUD LELY RESORT CD PUD o NAPLES LAKES M COUNTRY CLUB O 15' MIN. TYPE "B" BUFFER PUD COLLEGE PARK SHADOWWOOD PUDA PL 20190000259 ©HAGAN SHADOWWOOD E N G I N E E R I N G PUD MASTER PLAN 1250 TAMIAMI TRAIL NORTH, STE. 2036 Naples, Florida 34102 DATE PROJECT NO. SCALE Phone (239) 851-8239 01 /2020 1 2019-240 As S1 Packet Pg. 64 9.A.3 Ci0�8Y CiOTA.YIt� Growth Management Department Zoning Division Comprehensive Planning Section MEMORANDUM To: Tim Finn, AICP, Principal Planner Zoning Services Section, Zoning Division From: Sue Faulkner, Principal Planner Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division Date: December 12, 2019 Subject: Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Consistency Review PETITION NUMBER: PL20190000259 -REV 6 PETITION NAME: Shadowwood PUD PUDA REQUEST: The petitioner is requesting a Planned Unit Development Amendment (PUDA) to the Shadowwood PUD (approved by Ordinance #82-49 — and as amended via Ordinance #08-43). The petitioner is proposing to modify the Shadowwood Exhibit `B' Master Plan to provide for ingress and egress to the last remaining development parcel in the PUD. This amendment is to address access for the northern portion of the PUD (Tract E). Submittal 2 included several additional documents requested by the County Attorney and other reviewing staff. Submittal 3 included revisions to Sections IV and V, as well as the PUD Master Plan. Submittal 4 includes an Amendment Narrative, a modified Master Plan, acreage adjustments to Section 4.2 of PUD and adjustments in maximum number of units to be consistent, text amendment of Section 4.3 and Table 1, Tract E, Development Standards. Submittal 5 included revisions to the Master Plan, the TIS, the Environmental Data, and the PUD document — including adding a deviation for a buffer. Submittal 6 includes a new landscape buffer deviation, preservation calculations, and additional minor corrections in PUD and Master Plan. LOCATION: The subject site is located on the north side of Rattlesnake -Hammock Road (CR 864) at Skyway Drive, approximately one mile west of Collier Blvd. (CR951), in Section 16, Township 50 South, Range 26 East. COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING COMMENTS: The subject site is identified as Urban Designation, Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict on the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). The f168.1-acre Planned Unit Development (PUD) was originally approved via Ord. #82-49 and subsequently amended with Ordinance #08-43. As amended, Shadowwood allows a total maximum of 574 residential units at a maximum density of 3.4 dwelling units per acre (DU/A) — (574 DUs - 168.1 Acres = 3.415 DU/A = 3.4 DU/A). According to the FLUE, "within the Urban designated areas a base density of 4 residential dwelling units per gross acre may be allowed, though is not an entitlement." Zoning Division • 2800 North Horseshoe Drive • Naples, FL 34104 0 239-252-2400 Pagel of 2 Packet Pg. 65 9.A.3 Although Tract `E' was always intended for residential uses (multi -family), it remains undeveloped to date. In preparation for developing this tract, the petitioner is requesting to modify the Master Plan to indicate three new ingress/egress points for Tract `E', all three connecting to local roads: one to connect with Polly Avenue, one to connect with Whitaker Road, and one to connect with Atkins Ave. Select FLUE Policies are shown below (in italics), followed by staff analysis in [bracketed bold text]. FLUE Policy 5.6: New developments shall be compatible with, and complementary to, the surrounding land uses, as set forth in the Land Development Code (Ordinance 04-41, adopted June 22, 2004 and effective October 18, 2004, as amended). [Comprehensive Planning staff leaves this determination to Zoning Services staff as part of their review of the petition in its entirety.] FLUE Objective 7 and Relevant Policies: Given the nature of this petition and the minor changes proposed (no changes in permitted uses, densities, or intensities), staff is of the opinion that a re-evaluation of most of the FLUE policies under Objective 7 (pertaining to access to arterial & collector roads, walkability, etc.) is not necessary, with the exception of Policy 7.3 as it pertains to interconnections and is addressed below. FLUE Policy 7.3: "All new and existing developments shall be encouraged to connect their local streets and/or interconnection points with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless of land use type. The interconnection of local streets between developments is also addressed in Policy 9.3 of the Transportation Element." [The proposed ingress/egress points will connect the PUD's local streets and/or interconnection points with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless of land use type and is consistent with FLUE Policy 7.3.1 CONCLUSION Based upon the above analysis, staff concludes the proposed changes to the Shadowwood Planned Unit Development (PUD) may be deemed consistent with the Future Land Use Element (FLUE). PETITION ON CITYVIEW cc: David Weeks, AICP, Growth Management Manager, Zoning Division, Comprehensive Planning Section Raymond V. Bellows, Manager, Zoning Division, Zoning Services Section PUDA-PL2019-0259 Shadowwood R6.docx Zoning Division • 2800 North Horseshoe Drive • Naples, FL 34104 • 239-252-2400 Page 2 of 2 Packet Pg. 66 9.A.4 Single Family Single Family Townhomes Multi Family Recreation Detached Attached & Single Dwelling Areas Family Zero Lot Line Principal Structure Minimum Lot Area ShadowWood — Tract E 1,600 s.f. 1,600 s.f. 1,100 s.f. 1 acre n/a Naples Lakes Country Club 5,500 s.f. 5,500 s.f 4,000 s.f. 1 acre n/a LASIP Conservation Area n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Naples Heritg G&C Club 9,000 s.f. 4,000 s.f. 4,000 s.f. 4,000 n/a RSF-4 7,500 s.f. n/a n/a n/a n/a Agriculture 5 acres n/a n/a n/a n/a Minimum Lot Width ShadowWood — Tract 32 feet 32 feet 18 feet 150 ft n/a. E Naples Lakes Country 70 50 50 150 n/a Club LASIP Conservation n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Area Naples Heritg G&C Club 80 ft 30 ft — single story 30 ft — single 30 ft — single n/a 25 ft — two story story story 50 ft — zero lot line 25 ft — two 25 ft — two story story RSF-4 70 ft n/a n/a n/a n/a Agriculture 165 ft n/a n/a n/a n/a Minimum Floor Area ShadowWood — Tract 1,000 sf 1,000 s.f. 900 s.f. 900 s.f. n/a E Naples Lakes Country 1,400 sf 1,400 sf 1,000 sf 1,000 sf n/a Club LASIP Conservation n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Area Naples Heritg G&C Club 1,500 s.f. 1,000 s.f. 1,000 s.f. 1,000 s.f. n/a RSF-4 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Agriculture n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Minimum Front Yard ShadowWood — Tract 12 feet'- 12 feet' - Principal 12 feet' 20 ft, or one- 15 feet —Principal E Principal and and Accessory Principal and half building 10 feet - Accessory Accessory height, Accessory whichever is greater - Principal and Accessory Naples Lakes Country 25 ft — Principal 20 ft — Principal 20 ft —Principal 20 ft — Principal 50 ft — Principal Club and Accessory and Accessory and Accessory and Accessory 20 ft - Accessory LASIP Conservation n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Area Naples Heritg G&C Club 25 ft 20 ft 20 ft 20 ft 50 ft from residential parcels — Principal 10 ft Accessory RSF-4 25 ft n/a n/a n/a n/a Agriculture 50 ft n/a n/a n/a n/a Minimum Side Yard ShadowWood — Tract 5 feet' 0 feet or 10 feet' 0 feet or 10 One-half 5 feet or one-half E Principal and - Principal and feet24 - building height building height, Accessory Accessory Principal and - whichever is Accessory Principal and greater - Principal X a Packet Pg. 67 Accessory and Accessory Naples Lakes Country 7.5 ft— 0 ft or 5 ft— 0 ft or 5 ft— 15 feet, or 25 feet — Principal Club Principal and Principal and Principal and where adjacent 10 feet - Accessory Accessory Accessory to a golf course: Accessory 0 feet; or lake:0 feet from the lake control elevation — Principal and Accessory LASIP Conservation n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Area Naples Heritg G&C Club 7.5 ft 5 feet — one story 5 feet — one 20 feet 25 ft from 7.5 — two-story story residential parcels 0 on one side and 7.5 — two story — Principal 10 feet on the other 10 ft Accessory side for zero lot line RSF-4 7.5 feet n/a n/a n/a n/a Agriculture 30 ft n/a n/a n/a n/a Minimum Rear Yard ShadowWood — Tract 5 feet or 20 5 feet or 20 feet 5 feet or 20 feet 15 feet or one- 5 feet or one-half E feet from alley' from alley' - from alley' - half building building height, - Principal Principal and Principal and height, whichever is 5 feet - Accessory Accessory whichever is greater — Principal Accessory greater — and Accessory Principal 5 feet Accessory Naples Lakes Country 20 feet — 0 feet or 5 feet — 0 feet or 5 feet 15 feet, or n/a Club Principal and Principal - Principal where adjacent Accessory 15 ft detached and 15 ft detached to a golf 10 feet attached for and 10 feet course: 0 feet; Accessory attached for or lake:0 feet Accessory from the lake control elevation for Principal 20 ft detached and 10 feet attached for Accessory LASIP Conservation n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Area Naples Heritg G&C Club 20 ft 15 ft 15 ft 20 ft n/a RSF-4 25 ft n/a n/a n/a n/a Agriculture n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Minimum Preserve Setback ShadowWood — Tract 25 feet — 25 feet — Principal 25 feet — 25 feet — 25 feet — E Principal 10 feet - Accessory Principal Principal Principal 10 feet - 10 feet 10 feet - 10 feet - Accessory Accessory Accessory Accessory Naples Lakes Country n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Club LASIP Conservation n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Area Naples Heritg G&C Club n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a RSF-4 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Agriculture n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Minimum distance X a Packet Pg. 68 between structures ShadowWood — Tract 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet One-half sum One-half sum of E of building building heights heights Naples Lakes Country Club n/a n/a n/a n/a 10 feet LASIP Conservation Area n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Naples Heritg G&C Club 15 feet or one- 15 feet or one-half 15 feet or one- 15 feet or one- n/a half of the sum of the sum of the half of the sum half of the sum of the height of height of adjacent of the height of of the height of adjacent buildings, adjacent adjacent buildings, measured from buildings, buildings, measured from exterior walls, measured from measured from exterior walls, whichever is exterior walls, exterior walls, whichever is greater whichever is whichever is eater greater greater RSF-4 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Agriculture n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Minimum Height Zoned Actual ShadowWood — Tract E Zoned 35 feet 35 feet 35 feet 35 feet 35 feet Actual 40 feet 40 feet 40 feet 40 feet 40 feet Both Principal Both Principal and Both Principal Both Principal Both Principal and Accessory Accessory and Accessory and Accessory and Accesso Naples Lakes Country Club Two stories Two stories Two stories Four stories 60 feet — Principal 40 feet Accessory LASIP Conservation Area n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Naples Heritg G&C Club Two stories Two stories Two stories Four stories n/a RS4 35 ft — Principal n/a n/a n/a n/a 20 ft Accessory Agriculture 35 ft—Principal n/a n/a n/a n/a ' Front yard setbacks shall be measured from Right -of -Way line and shall allow a 2-foot separation from the structure to the Public Utility Easement If side yard is 0 feet on one side, the other side yard shall be 10 feet for a total building separation of 10 feet s Alley setbacks shall be measured from the easement line. Parking may be accessed from alleys at the rear of the property provided there is a 5-foot clearance from the vehicle to the edge of pavement 4 Multi -family structures may have terraced setbacks. Terraced setbacks shall be measured from the ground floor exterior wall, as long as a minimum 15-foot building wall setback is provided Packet Pg. 69 2 � 0 0 7 0 / m / Packet Pg. 70 9.A.6 FinnTimoth From: Tom LeRoy <2tomleroy@gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, May 5, 2019 3:18 PM To: FinnTimothy Cc: Neil Fogle; Anne Daley Subject: "Clyde Quinby letter."..... Mr Finn... I am the secretary of the Wing South Condominium Association and live at 3965 Skyway Drive some 25 or so yards from the end of Adkins Road .... Adkins is one of the proposed access roads being considered in the Clyde Quinby letter and due to be included in the consideration and discussion at a public meeting on May 7, 2019... This Clyde Quinby notice was given to me by a home owner who lives closer to Rattlesnake Hammock and his address is much farther away than our community or our home location.... this is to let you know that to my knowledge not one owner on Skyway Drive inside Wing South received this notice.... certainly we did not.... The back yards of 3965 and 3963 Skyway Drive are roughly 25 yards from the proposed Adkins access to the subject property and we want the record to show that we oppose the Adkins access being granted to that subject property.... While I am the secretary of the Wing South Condominium Association this email and our objection is that of a home owner and as an individual..... Thank you for your attention Mr Finn.... Tom and Virginia LeRoy 3965 Skyway Drive Naples, Florida 34112 239-775-5886 Packet Pg. 71 9.A.6 FinnTimoth From: Clark Reid <clark.reid@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2019 5:12 PM To: BosiMichael; FinnTimothy; StrainMark Subject: SD Corp PUD Amendment Petition PL20190000259 SD Corporation's PUD Amendment Petition, PL20190000259, to the Shadowwood Planned Unit Development Ordinance 08-43 should be denied. There is no benefit of allowing access to Santa Barbara Blvd via Whitaker Rd — or Adkins Ave or Polly Ave - for future residents of tract E. Tract E already has access to a six lane road, Rattlesnake a Hammock, through the existing Shadowwood PUD property. This was approved in the original 1982 PUD and its update in 2008. a 0 There are several costs associated with an approval of this request. It would cost the county money � to improve Whitaker Rd to handle the hundreds of cars per day extra if this proposed change is o approved. Bicycle lanes and sidewalks may have to be added. And, it might require a stop light at Whitaker Rd and Santa Barbara with a large cost to change that intersection. The costs can only be n calculated with a full transportation review of this request. There's also a cost to the residents of Sunset Estates. The private/public roads in this area serve residences and agricultural operations. They were never intended to be feeder roads for neighboring developments. Naples Heritage is not asking for a western ingress/egress to their property. Why SD Corp? n SD Corporation has no interest in developing tract E of the PUD. They have offered all of the PUD's undeveloped property to Conservation Collier. Conservation Collier has entered into an agreement to purchase 37 acres of SD Corp's property, and has accepted the Tract E 77 acres as a secondary purchase priority. By virtue of the 37 acre commitment to sell to Conservation Collier, SD Corp is left with marketing the last 77 acre tract E. Having a western access to this tract increases its marketability. The petition is not an insubstantial PUD change because of LDC Section 10.02.13.E.1 that defines the criteria to determine if a proposed modification to an approved PUD is "Substantial": Section a of the above mentioned LDC states, "A substantial increase in the impacts of the development which may include, but are not limited to increases in traffic generation, changes in traffic circulation, or impacts on other public facilities". It is obvious this petition request of adding Whitaker Rd as an access to Tract E causes an increase in traffic generation for Whitaker Rd, changes in traffic circulation, and impacts other public facilities - the intersection of Whitaker Rd and Santa Barbara Blvd. Section h of the above mentioned LDC states, "A change that will bring about a relationship to an abutting land use that would be incompatible with an adjacent land use." Whitaker Rd is a feeder road for all other roads in Sunset Estates for access to Santa Barbara Blvd. Sunset Estates is an Agriculture Zoned area of 2.5 and 5 acre plots of residences and agricultural operations. Using Whitaker Rd - or Polly or Adkins - as ingress and egress to tract E is incompatible with Sunset Estates land use. Packet Pg. 72 9.A.6 The applicant's Pre-App Notes mentions GMP policies to justify their request. They are mistaken on at least two accounts. Future Land Use Element Policy 7.2 states, "The County shall encourage internal accesses or loop roads in an effort to help reduce vehicle congestion on nearby collector and arterial roads and minimize the need for traffic signals." This application does the opposite. It removes access to Rattlesnake Hammock Rd for the tract E development and replaces it with access to an arterial road that has no existing traffic light on Santa Barbara Blvd. The current approved access on Rattlesnake Hammock already has a light. Rattlesnake Hammock is a six lane road at the southern end of Shadowwood PUD. Whitaker Road is a narrow 2 lane road and with this petition would force a quantity of traffic onto Whitaker Rd that it could not accommodate. Transportation Element Policy 9.3 states, "_The LDC shall identify the circumstances and conditions that would require the interconnection of neighboring developments, and shall also develop standards a and criteria for the safe interconnection of such local streets...." This cannot be done without a substantial change to the PUD requiring a full Transportation study of the proposed ingress/egress a change to the Shadowwood PUD and its compliance with current LDC transportation requirements. o The applicant states that they are not requesting a change of the 3.4 residential units per acre 3: approved in the original PUD. But we all know that it could be changed by a future development c rezoning request. Since Russell Square was granted 7 units per acre at the North end of Sunset Blvd, the county would be obligated to grant the 7 units to the acre for tract E. This density would y drastically change the transportation impact on surrounding roads. The only time the county should consider a change to ingress/egress to Shadowwood's tract E is when a rezoning request is made r and a substantial change to the PUD is submitted. L Lastly a very similar issue was herd by Collier County Planning Commission last fall. The Taormina Reserve PUD showed access to its development via Sunset Blvd - part of Sunset Estates ° w private/public road network. Russell Square PUD wanted to terminate Sunset Blvd at its southern o property line and not extend it through its development to Taormina Reserve. In an email to Chief o Hearing Examiner Mark Strain I supported the termination of Sunset Blvd at the southern end of , Russell Square so that NO access to either PUD is granted via Sunset Blvd for many of the same r reasons to not allow Whitaker to service Shadowwood. The Planning Commission ruled in favor of Neal Communities Russell Square request and ordered Sunset Blvd to dead end and not connect to Russell Square. I mentioned the possibility of the Whitaker Rd request of SD Corp in my email to r Strain. He concurred that the Sunset Estates roads were never meant to be feeder roads to adjacent a development. SD Corporation's PUD Amendment Petition PL20190000259 is premature and doesn't consider E relevant current land use codes, transportation policies and impacts, and potential impacts on the a residents and roadways of Sunset Estates. Please deny this request. Clark Reid 6184 Whitaker Rd Naples, FL 34112 cell- 239-285-0501 z Packet Pg. 73 9.A.6 FinnTimoth From: Anne Daley <adaley0l@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, May 27, 2019 4:37 PM To: FinnTimothy Subject: Wing South Letter of Objection - PUDA-PL-20190000259, Shadowwood PUD Attachments: Wing South Letter of Objection -Adkins Access.pdf Mr. Finn, Enclosed is a letter of objection from the Wing South Board of Directors. We object to the Adkins access point sought out in PUDA-PL-20190000259, Shadowwood PUD. Thank you for the opportunity to communicate our views. Regards, Anne Daley President, Wing South Packet Pg. 74 9.A.6 May 27, 2019 Mr. Tim Finn, AICP and Principle Planner Growth Management Department, Planning & Regulation 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 RE: PUDA-PL-20190000259, 5hadowwood PUD Dear Mr. Finn, On behalf of Wing South, the Board of Directors is writing to communicate our objection to access to the Shadowwood PUD via Adkins Road. Our objection is based upon the following: • There is insufficient space to provide for Wing South homeowner privacy/ privacy screening where Adkins would be extended to access Tract E. • If the intended access is to run directly east, there are privacy issues for multiple owners' homes and this access would infringe on the maintenance easement for the LASIP drainage that exists along that path. • Wing South is a private airport and public access via Adkins would pose a security issue for our aircraft and pilots. We appreciate the opportunity to register our objection. Regards, Wing South Board of Directors Anne Daley, President Neil Fogle, Vice President Rich Lytle, Treasurer Tom LeRoy, Secretary Robert Ross, Board Member Scott Harrison, Board Member Wc*tg 5,ft , Ar pewk, 4130 Skyway Dr"-e,, Nnf..sey FL 3411.2 1 Packet Pg. 75 9.A.6 FinnTimoth From: Tom LeRoy <2tomleroy@gmaii.com5 Sent: Monday, December 30, 2019 1:24 PM To: FinnTimothy; tomothy.finn@colliercountyfl.gov Subject: Proposed Tract E Access EXTERNAL EMAII. This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Mr Finn Q As a potentially impacted home owner regarding the proposed multiple access points to the Tract E property I'd like to offer an alternative option to consider... a 0 1 can't imagine a full blown development the size of Tract E and located where it is that the developer or potential home owners would consider any of the options as attractive access roads to their new home �0 properties ....... it would serve everyone concerned ....from the developer and potential home owners to all the properties along the proposed roads to use a minimal impact access off of Collier Boulevard along side U) Serenity Park.... perhaps the developer could work with the county to provide an access easement along the 0) perimeter of the Serenity recreation area and the developer provide like kind property or compensation to the county for such an access.... �, L d r There is no doubt in my mind that no one will want what is being proposed so it will be a government decision in the end to do what government will approve ...access off of Collier like all other Collier road side o developments have a road and gate entrance for the most part ... the subject property could do much the same o with a small bridge over the canal on the very north end accessing the subject property.... a 0 Just a suggestion.. w c aD Tom and Virginia LeRoy t 3965 Skyway Drive r Q a Packet Pg. 76 9.A.6 FinnTimoth From: Anne Daley <adaley0l @gmail.com> Sent: Friday, January 3, 2020 9:47 AM To: FinnTimothy Subject: Wing South Objection Letter & Exhibits - Petition Number PL20190000259 Attachments: Wing South Letter of Objection -Adkins Access 1.1.2020.pdf; Wing South Letter of Objection 1.1.20 Exhibit 2.pdf; Wing South Letter of Objection 1.1.20 Exhibit 1.pdf EXTLRNAL LMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Good morning Mr. Finn, Enclosed is a letter of objection from Wing South, along with 2 exhibits. I would like time to speak on behalf of Wing South at the meeting on January 16,2020. Accordingly, please include the enclosed documents in the CCPC agenda packet. Thank you Anne Daley President, Wing South 516-455-2782 Packet Pg. 77 9.A.6 January 1, 2020 Mr. Timothy Finn, Principle Planner Growth Management Department, Planning & Regulation 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 RE: Petition Number PL20190000259 to Amend Shadowwood PUD Dear Mr. Finn, On behalf of Wing South, the Board of Directors is writing to express our objection to allowing access to the Shadowwood PUD via Adkins Avenue and, depending on design, via Polly Avenue. Our objections are based upon the following: • Access to the PUD from the north west corner of Wing South would remove any possibility of privacy for the homes along the north side of the community. (The home on the northwest corner are approximately 70 feet from where Adkins currently ends.) Extending Adkins Avenue east would also infringe on the maintenance road easement and allow traffic to pass within 30 feet of the homes along the north side of Wing South. • Wing South is a private airport and public access via Adkins would pose a security risk to our hangar homes and aircraft. • Access via Polly Avenue, if extended east, would also infringe on the maintenance road along the north side of the PUD. If that access were to extend far enough east to where the maintenance road turns south, it would create a security risk to flight operations and pilots. Exhibit 1, included with this letter, provides an annotated image of the area in question We appreciate the opportunity to register our objection. Regards, Wing South Board of Directors Anne Daley, President Neil Fogle, Vice President Rich Lytle, Treasurer Tom LeRoy, Secretary Robert Ross, Board Member Scott Harrison, Board Member W"W Souf vAwtvewk, 4130 Sky wng A -we- Naf,-Iy FL 34112 1 Packet Pg. 78 9.A.6 Exhibit 2 This image demonstrates the close proximity to existing homes if the access via Adkins were to be selected. In addition, this access point, if extended directly east would remove the LASIP maintenance road and remove all privacy from the homes along that path. Packet Pg. 79 9.A.6 Exhibit 1 This satellite view snows the close proximity of the Adkins access point to existing hangar homes and the potential risk of the Polly Avenue access point to safety area at the north end of the runway. Packet Pg. 80 9.A.7 > WATERFORD Z ESTATES D W D D D r 0 mm � m m m 0 O ONYX HUNTINGTON WOODS 0 800 MANDALAY HOMES OF ISLANDIA NAPLES HERITAGE GOLF AND COUNTRY CLUB LASIP TRACT E CONSERVATION AREA POT. WATERMAIN CONNECTIONS POT. FORCEMAIN SANITARY CONNECTION EXISTING 6" W.M. EXISTING 8" GRAVITY SEWER TRACT C WING SOUTH AIRPARK VILLAS � KtIO D p LAKE TRACT A RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK RD NAPLES LAKES COUNTRY CLUB LEGEND EXISTING 8" GRAVITY SEWER POT. SANITARY FM CONNECTION FM = FORCEMAIN WING SOUTH AIRPARK VILLAS POT. = POTENTIAL EXISTING 6" WATERMAIN REC = RECREATION POT. WATERMAIN CONNECTION p = PRESERVE PUD UTILITY EXHIBIT.dwg, Mar 04, 2020, 10:58am SHADOWWOOD PUDA PL 20190000259 REVISIONS 9/2/20 CREATED PER RAI #3 © HAGAN SHADOWWOOD ENGINEERING UTILITY EXHIBIT 1250 TAMIAMI TRAIL NORTH, STE. 203B Naples, Florida 34102 DA03/04/20 PROJECT NO. SCALE SHEET Phone (239) 851-8239 As Shown 1 OF 1 Packet Pg. 81 9.A.8 Lq 0 e4 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Board of County Commissioners on March 24th, 2020, in the Board of County Commission- er's Meeting Room, Third Floor, Collier Government Center, 3299 East Tamiami Trail, Naples FL., the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) will consider the enactment of a County Ordinance. The meeting will commence at 9.00 A.M. The title of the pro- posed Ordinance is as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMIS- SIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDI- NANCE NUMBER 82-49, AS AMENDED, THE SHADOWWOOD PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD), TO REDESIGNATE 4t ACRES OF LAND FROM TRACT C, PRI- VATE AIR PARK DISTRICT, TO TRACT E. RESIDENTIAL DEVEL-OPMENT, BY ADDING THE DE- VELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR TRACT E; BY AMENDING THE MASTER PLAN TO ADD 3 AC- CESS POINTS TO PROVIDE IN- GRESS AND EGRESS TO TRACT E INCLUDING ACCESS TO POL- LY AVENUE, ATKINS ROAD AND WHITAKER ROAD; BY REMOVING A REQUIREMENT THAT ALL ACCESS ROADS TO THE PUD ARE PRIVATE ROADS; AND BY REVISING DE- VELOPER COMMITMENTS. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY CON- SISTING OF 77.99t ACRES IS PART OF THE 168.1 ACRE PUD LOCATED AT WING SOUTH AIR PARK, EAST OF SANTA BARBARA BOULEVARD BE- TWEEN DAVIS BOULEVARD NAPLESHIEWS.COM I WEDNESDAY, MARCH 4, 2020 1 23D RATTLESNAKE - MOCK ROAD, IN SEC- TION 16, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE'26 EAST, COL- LIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. (PL20190000259] A copy of the proposed Ordi- nance is on file with the Clerk to the Board and is available for Inspection. All interested parties are invited to attend and be heard. NOTE: All persons wishing to speak on any agenda item must register with the County manager prior to presentation of the agenda item to be ad- dressed. Individual speakers will be limited to 3 minutes on any item. The selection of any individual to speak on be- half of an organization or i9to ouraged. If rec- the Chairman, a for a group or may be allotted speak on an item. Persons wishing to have writ- ten or graphic materials in- cluded in the Board agenda packets must submit said ma- terial a minimum of 3 weeks prior to the respective public hearing. In any case, written materials intended to be con- sidered b the Board shall be submitted to the appropriate County staff . a minimum of seven days prior to the public hearing. All materials used in gresentations before the Board will become a perma- nent part of the record. Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verba- tim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based.. If you are a person with a dis- ability who needs any accom- modation in order to partici- pate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to yPu, to the provision of certain as- sistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Mar- aggement Division, ►ocated at 3335 Tamiaml Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112 53K (239) 252-8380, at least t� days prior to the meetin?. As- sisted listening devices fof the hearing impaired are availa- ble in the Board of County Commissioners Office. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMk STONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BURT L. SAUNDERS, CHAIR- MAN CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT & COMPTROLLER By: Ann Jenne}ohn Deputy Clerk (SEAL) Pub Hate: March 4, 2020 M4081831 Packet Pg. 82 a 78D WEDN SDAY, MAY �E},. 9;0 v NAPL_E5 9.A.10 Packet Pg. 83 9.A.11 Applicant's Statement for Hybrid Quasi -Judicial Proceedings As the authorized applicant for ShadowWood PUDA petition PL20190000259. I chose to proceed with my public hearing during the declared emergency, while the County conducts a hybrid virtual meeting, and waive my right to contest any procedural irregularity- Dated:May 22, 2020 Jo W. skey, Jr. Director and Vice -President of S.D. Corporation of Naples, Inc. Dftitioner 4828-7279-5325. v. 2 Packet Pg. 84 9.A.12 TPODIICOCN planning -engineering Traffic Impact Statement Shadowwood Planned Unit Development Amendment (PUDA) Prepared for: Hagan Engineering 1250 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 203B Naples, FL 34102 Collier County, FL 05/27/2020 Prepared by: Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 2800 Davis Boulevard, Suite 200 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: 239-566-9551 Email: ntrebilcock@trebilcock.biz Collier Countv Transportation MethodoloRv Review Fee — No Fee Collier County Transportation Review Fee — Major Study — No Fee Packet Pg. 85 Shadowwood PUDA — TIS — May 2020 9.A.12 Statement of Certification I certify that this Traffic Impact Statement has been prepared by me or under my immediate supervision and that I have experience and training in the field of Traffic and Transportation Engineering. J , iTR�e/<�,,i 2: No 47116 STATE OF : J O R \OP: Nam,.` 0NA� Digitally signed by Norman Trebilcock DN: c=US, st=Florida,l=Naples, o=Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA, cn=Norman Trebilcock, email=ntrebilcock@trebilcock.biz Date: 2020.05.29 10:21:44-04'00' Norman J. Trebilcock, AICP, P.E. FL Registration No. 47116 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 2800 Davis Boulevard, Suite 200 Naples, FL 34104 Company Cert. of Auth. No. 27796 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page 12 Packet Pg. 86 9.A.12 Shadowwood PUDA — TIS — May 2020 Table of Contents ProjectDescription......................................................................................................................... 4 TripGeneration............................................................................................................................... 6 Trip Distribution and Assignment................................................................................................... 6 BackgroundTraffic........................................................................................................................ 10 Existing and Future Roadway Network......................................................................................... 11 Project Impacts to Area Roadway Network -Link Analysis............................................................ 11 ImprovementAnalysis.................................................................................................................. 14 Mitigationof Impact..................................................................................................................... 14 Appendices Appendix A: Methodology Meeting........................................................................................... 15 AppendixB: PUD Master Plan.................................................................................................... 21 Appendix C: Trip Generation Calculations................................................................................. 23 Appendix D: Alternative Traffic Distribution Scenarios............................................................. 28 Q 0 a 0 0 3 0 t v r r a� r m 0 N O N ti N LO O a� a� c m E U r r a r_ 0 E r r a Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P P - 1 3 Packet Pg. 87 9.A.12 Shadowwood PUDA — TIS — May 2020 Project Description The Shadowwood PUDA project is a proposed residential development located north of Rattlesnake Hammock Road, approximately 0.5 miles east of Santa Barbara Boulevard, in Section 16, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County Florida. The total project site is approximately 77.99 acres (per the Collier County Appraisers Office). A methodology meeting was held with the Collier County Transportation Planning staff, via email, on May 10, 2019 (refer to Appendix A: Methodology Meeting). This report is consistent with the approved methodology notes. Refer to Figure 1— Project Location Map, which follows, and Appendix B: PUD Master Plan. Figure 1— Project Location Map .v:R Haven 54hlUk. Ffd Cn a � m $ a AM- Ave 2 [3 PN ��• .1'lA d GoEf g CIA Cvn'c-' S7 Calusa Palms Idufsery unlryClub ManorCare�ealihO Services at Lely Palrns ■ rt� 9' a Shadowwood Rattlesnake Hammock I ......... ..� r-, Rafts—ake Hammock Road Insplra Apariments Sierra Collega Park HOA Loan Specialisis '. Florida The Shadowwood PUDA (Planned Unit Development Amendment) project site is currently a vacant parcel and is located in Tract E of a multi -tract PUD as identified in Collier County Ordinance 08-43, as may be amended. The PUD allows for a total of 558 multi -family dwelling units to be developed, of which 194 dwelling units are existing. The Shadowwood PUDA project proposes to develop the remaining 364 multi -family dwelling units within Tract E of the PUD. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 14 Packet Pg. 88 9.A.12 Shadowwood PUDA — TIS — May 2020 With the exception of Tract E, the Shadowwood PUD has been substantially developed as Wing South Airpark and Shadowwood Villas with single family and multifamily housing as well as an aircraft runway. Aircraft are allowed to utilize internal roadways within the developed PUD to provide access to the runway from residences without direct frontage to the runway. The PUD Ordinance 08-43 illustrates the access to Tract E would be to the south utilizing Skyway Drive and its connection to Rattlesnake Hammock Road. This PUDA analysis will consider traffic distribution from Skyway Drive as originally depicted in the PUD Ordinance. In addition, the PUDA proposes to allow access to the roadway network utilizing existing local roads directly adjacent to the western boundaries of the parcel. An additional analysis scenario will distribute traffic from the three proposed accesses as well as utilizing Skyway Drive. The proposed development parameters are illustrated in Table 1 Table 1 ITE — Development Land Use Designation Development Land Use ITE LUC Size [SIC Code in Brackets] (ITE variable) Residential Multifamily 220 — Multifamily Housing (Low- 364 (dwelling units) [Not Applicable] Rise) Traffic generation associated with the proposed development is evaluated generally based on ITE Trip Generation Manual, 101h Edition and ITE Trip Generation Handbook, 3rd Edition. In agreement with ITE Land Use Code (LUC) descriptions, the ITE land use designations are illustrated in Table 1. The PUDA project access connections to the surrounding roadway network are an existing, signalized full movement connection from Skyway Drive onto Rattlesnake Hammock Road and Grand Lely Boulevard and a proposed direct connection onto Whitaker Road, a proposed full access opening onto Polly Avenue and a proposed direct connection onto Adkins Avenue. A detailed evaluation of applicable access points —turn lane requirements will be performed at the time of site development permitting/platting when more specific development parameters will be made available. Access to the site is approved from Skyway Drive onto Rattlesnake Hammock Road and Grand Lely Boulevard. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 5 Packet Pg. 89 9.A.12 Shadowwood PUDA — TIS — May 2020 Trip Generation The project's site trip generation is based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition. The software program OTISS (Online Traffic Impact Study Software, most current version, is used to create the raw unadjusted trip generation for the project. The ITE equations are used for the trip generation calculations. The ITE — OTISS trip generation calculation worksheets and the LUC descriptions are provided in Appendix C: ITE Trip Generation Calculations. The trip generation associated with the proposed build -out conditions is summarized in Table 2. Based on ITE recommendations and consistent with Collier County TIS Guidelines and Procedures, no reductions for internal capture or pass -by trip are considered for this project. Table 2 Project Trip Generation — Tract E Build -out Conditions — Average Weekday Daily Two -Way AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Volume Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Total Traffic 2,711 37 126 163 118 69 187 In agreement with the Collier County TIS guidelines, significantly impacted roadways are identified based on the proposed project highest peak hour trip generation (net external traffic) and consistent with the peak hour of the adjacent street traffic. Based on the information contained in Collier County 2019 Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR), the peak hour for the adjacent roadway network is PM peak hour. Trip Distribution and Assignment The traffic generated by the proposed project is assigned to the adjacent roadways using the knowledge of the area and engineering judgement. The site -generated trip distribution utilizing the connection depicted in the approved PUD Ordinance is shown in Table 3A and it is graphically depicted in Figure 2A — PUDA Project (Approved PUD Distribution) by Percentage and by PM Peak Hour. The site -generated trip distribution utilizing the proposed PUDA distribution is shown in Table 3B and it is graphically depicted in Figure 2B — PUDA Project (Proposed PUDA Distribution) by Percentage and by PM Peak Hour. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g- 1 6 Packet Pg. 90 9.A.12 Shadowwood PUDA — TIS — May 2020 Table 3A Proposed Development — Traffic Distribution for PM Peak Hour — Based on Approved PUD Collier Distribution PM Peak Hour Project Vol.* Roadway Link County Roadway Link Location of Project Enter Exit Link No. Traffic Santa Barbara Blvd 79.0 Whitaker Rd to Davis Blvd 40% SB-47 NB-27 County Barn Rd to Santa Rattlesnake Hammock Rd 74.0 30% EB — 36 WB — 21 Barbara Blvd Santa Barbara Blvd to Rattlesnake Hammock Rd 75.0 70% WB-83 EB-48 Skyway Dr Rattlesnake Hammock Rd 75.0 Skyway Dr to Collier Blvd 30% WB — 35 EB — 21 Note(s): *Peak hour, peak direction traffic volumes are underlined and bold to be used in Roadway Link Level of Service calculations. Table 3B Proposed Development — Traffic Distribution for PM Peak Hour — Based on Proposed PUDA Collier Distribution PM Peak Hour Project Vol.* Roadway Link County Roadway Link Location of Project Enter Exit Link No. Traffic Rattlesnake Hammock Rd to Santa Barbara Blvd 79.0 10% NB— 12 SB-7 Polly Ave Santa Barbara Blvd 79.0 Polly Ave to Whitaker Rd 20% NB — 24 SB —14 Santa Barbara Blvd 79.0 Whitaker Rd to Davis Blvd 60% SB — 71 NB — 42 County Barn Rd to Santa Rattlesnake Hammock Rd 74.0 25% EB — 29 WB —17 Barbara Blvd Santa Barbara Blvd to Rattlesnake Hammock Rd 75.0 15% EB —17 WB —10 Skyway Dr Rattlesnake Hammock Rd 75.0 Skyway Dr to Collier Blvd 15% WB —18 EB —10 Whitaker Rd** N/A Project Access to Santa 50% EB — 59 WB — 35 Barbara Blvd Adkins Ave** N/A Project Access to Polly Ave 20% EB — 24 WB —14 Polly Ave** N/A Adkins Ave to Santa Barbara 20% EB — 24 WB —14 Note(s): *Peak hour, peak direction traffic volumes are underlined and bold to be used in Roadway Link Level of Service calculations. **Not a Collier County monitored roadway. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g- 1 7 Packet Pg. 91 9.A.12 Shadowwood PUDA — TIS — May 2020 Figure 2A — PUDA Project (Approved PUD Distribution) by Percentage and by PM Peak Hour C 4 LO Jilcf N 3 — iiyr. waoter., 40% Adkins AYe PN'ry• ivp d Goff I Club Cal usa Palms Nursery H m. n, mtryCluh ManorCare-iealth vices at Lely Palms Distribution by Percentage Access Based on Approved PUD Lo Jack Li C AA Haven 7 whr ke. FM Z = = d 3 Enter-118. Exit- 69 Enter-47, Exit-27 ing ou1.11 Afrpark Adkins AYe A:0.•c. ::: PNSy,yvn $' d Goff Club Calusa Palms Nursery 9 Shadoavwood 9 H m. n- Rattlesnake Hammock Enter- 118. Exit- 69 untryClub ManorCare-iealth A rvices at LelyPal ms ■ > 7. Enter-36, Exit-21 �Rn� Ins Enter-83, E:Xa-48 Era%r 5, Exit-21 College Park A Distribution by PM Peak Hour HOA Loan Specialists Access Based on Approved PUD ya Florida Shadowwood 9 Rattlesnake Hammock lnsp ra A 70% e n t s 3 I 9 College Park A HOA Loan Specialists ya Florida Q Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a - 1 8 Packet Pg. 92 Shadowwood PUDA — TIS — May 2020 9.A.12 Figure 2B — Project (Proposed PUDA Distribution) by Percentage and by PM Peak Hour C 4 Lo .}aCf N 60% C HavF_i ,.. rn - 3 — iFyr. waoter., 20% Golf Club Calusa Palms Nurs 10% i e:nnN m Project 20% 30 % 50 % 20% 9 Sou Lh Airpark 20% 20% Shadowwood Rattlesnake Hammock 30% 1tryCluh %ManorCare-iealth Q rvices at LelyPalms ■ } Inspira A=Lnts� 15% rra College Park Distribution by Percentage HOA Loan Specialists Accesses Based on Proposed PUDA Florida s• Lo Jack N -_ Enter-71, Exit-42 c AA Haven 7 19hI,-Fry en = Enter-59, Exd-35 3 Roy C. r'1ao60°0 Enter-24, Exd-1 4 A:kln; Ave d Coif Club Enter-24, Exit-14 Calusa Palms Nurs Aio Enter-12 Exit-7 untryClub �4111,vices ManorCare -i Ith at Lely� Enter-29, Exa-17 ,�, , Enter-17, Exit-10 -% r Enter-24, Exit-14 Shadoavwood 9 Rattlesnake Hammock Enter-35,�Exit-20 IriSpra Apartments 9 1Errter 178 ' ExtO QCollege Park A HOA Loan Specialists Florida Q Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a - 1 9 Packet Pg. 93 9.A.12 Shadowwood PUDA — TIS — May 2020 Background Traffic Average background traffic growth rates are estimated for the segments of the roadway network in the study area using the Collier County Transportation Planning Staff guidance of a minimum 2% growth rate, or the historical growth rate from peak hour peak direction volume (estimated from 2008 through 2019), whichever is greater. Another way to derive the background traffic is to use the 2019 Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR) volume plus the trip bank volume. The higher of the two determinations is to be used in the Roadway Link Level of Service analysis. Table 4, Background Traffic without Project illustrates the application of projected growth rates to generate the projected background (without project) peak hour peak direction traffic volume for the build -out year 2024. Table 4 Background Traffic without Project (2019 - 2024) 2024 Projected 2024 Projected 2019 AUIR Projected Pk Hr, Peak Dir Pk Hr, Peak Dir cc Pk Hr, Pk Dir Traffic Background Background Roadway AUIR Roadway Link Background Annual Growth Trip Traffic Volume Traffic Volume Link Link Location Traffic Growth Factor Bank w/out Project w/out Project ID # Volume Rate (trips/hr) (trips/hr) Trip (trips/hr) (%/yr)* Growth Factor** Bank*** Santa Rattlesnake Barbara 79.0 Hammock Rd to 980 4.00% 1.2167 1,193 220 1,200 Blvd Whitaker Rd Santa Whitaker to Barbara 79.0 980 4.00% 1.2167 1,193 220 1,200 v Davis Blvd Blvd Rattlesnake County Barn Rd Hammock 74.0 to Santa 720 2.00% 1.1041 795 100 820 Rd Barbara Blvd Rattlesnake Santa Barbara Hammock 75.0 Blvd to Collier 590 2.00% 1.1041 652 163 753 Rd Blvd Note(s): *Annual Growth Rate — based on peak hour, peak direction volume (from 2008 through 2019), or 2% minimum. **Growth Factor = (1 + Annual Growth Rate )5. 2024 Projected Volume = 2019 AUIR Volume x Growth Factor. ***2024 Projected Volume = 2019 AUIR Volume +Trip Bank. The projected 2024 Peak Hour — Peak Direction Background Traffic is the greater of the Growth Factor or Trip Bank calculation, which is underlined and bold as applicable. a� m Y 0 N 0 N 1— N LO 0 H a� a� r c m t a c m E t v R r r Q Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 10 Packet Pg. 94 9.A.12 Shadowwood PUDA — TIS — May 2020 Existing and Future Roadway Network The existing roadway conditions are extracted from the Collier County 2019 AUIR and the project roadway conditions are based on the current Collier County 5-Year Work Program. Roadway improvements that are currently under construction or are scheduled to be constructed within the five-year Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) or Capital Improvement program (CIP) are considered to be committed improvements. As no such improvements were identified in the Collier County 2019 AUIR, the evaluated roadways are anticipated to remain as such through project build -out. The existing and future roadway conditions are illustrated in Table 5, Existing and Future Roadway Conditions. Table 5 Existing and Future Roadway Conditions CC AUIR Roadway Link 2019 Min. 2019 Peak Dir, Peak Hr 2024 2024 Peak Dir, Peak Hr ' Roadway Link Roadway Standard Roadway Link ID # Location Capacity Capacity Condition LOS Condition Volume Volume Rattlesnake Santa Barbara 79.0 Hammock Rd to 6D E 3,100 (SB) 6D 3,100 (SB) Blvd Whitaker Rd Santa Barbara Whitaker Rd to 79.0 6D E 3,100 (SB) 6D 3,100 (SB) Blvd Davis Blvd County Barn Rd Rattlesnake 74.0 to Santa Barbara 6D E 2,900 (EB) 6D 2,900 (EB) Hammock Rd Blvd Santa Barbara Rattlesnake 75.0 Blvd to Collier 6D E 2,900 (EB) 6D 2,900 (EB) Hammock Rd Blvd Note(s): 2U = 2-lane undivided roadway; 4D, 6D, 8D = 4-lane, 6-lane, 8-lane divided roadway, respectively; LOS = Level of Service. Project Impacts to Area Roadway Network -Link Analysis The Collier County Transportation Planning Services developed Level of Service (LOS) volumes for the roadway links impacted by the project, which are evaluated to determine the project impacts to the area roadway network in the future horizon year 2024. The Collier County Transportation Planning Services guidelines have determined that a project will be considered to have a significant and adverse impact if both the percentage volume capacity exceeds 2% of the capacity for the link directly accessed by the project and for the link adjacent to the link directly accessed by the project; 3% for other subsequent links and if the roadway is projected to operate below the adopted LOS standard. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 11 Packet Pg. 95 9.A.12 Shadowwood PUDA — TIS — May 2020 Table 6A, Roadway Link Level of Service (LOS) — with Project in the Year 2024 — Approved PUD Distribution illustrates the LOS traffic impacts of the project (based on the approved PUD traffic distribution) to the area roadway network. Based on these criteria, this project does not create any significant or adverse impacts to the area roadway network. None of the analyzed links are projected to exceed the adopted LOS standard with or without the project at 2024 build -out conditions. Table 613, Roadway Link Level of Service (LOS) — with Project in the Year 2024 — Proposed PUDA Distribution illustrates the LOS traffic impacts of the project (based on the proposed PUDA traffic distribution) to the area roadway network. Based on these criteria, this project does have a significant impact on the analyzed Santa Barbara Boulevard segment from Whitaker Road to Davis Boulevard. None of the other analyzed links are projected to have a significant impact or exceed the adopted LOS standard with or without the project at 2024 build -out conditions. The analyzed roadway segments are not located within the Collier County's Transportation Concurrency Exception Area (TCEA). In addition, the proposed development is not situated within the County's designated Transportation Concurrency Management Area (TCMA). The TCEA's and TCMA's designations are provided in Policy 5.4 and 5.6 of the Transportation Element — Collier County Growth Management Plan (GMP) Table 6A Roadway Link Level of Service (LOS) — with Project in the Year 2024 — Approved PUD Distribution 2019 Peak Roadway Min LOS Min LOS CC 2024 Peak /o Vol Dir, Peak Link Peak exceeded exceeded Roadway AUIR Roadway Link Dir, Peak Hr Capacity Hr Dir, Peak Hr without with Link Link ID Location Volume Impact by Capacity (Project Vol project? Project? # w/Project** Project Volume Added)* Yes/No Yes/No Rattlesnake Santa 79.0 Hammock Rd to 3,100 (SB) SB-47 1,247 1.5% No No Barbara Blvd Whitaker Rd Rattlesnake County Barn Rd to Hammock 74.0 Santa Barbara 2,900 (EB) EB-36 849 1.2% No No Rd Blvd Rattlesnake Santa Barbara Hammock 75.0 Blvd to Collier 2,900 (EB) EB-48 764 1.7% No No Rd Blvd Rattlesnake Santa Barbara Hammock 75.0 Blvd to Collier 2,900 (EB) EB — 21 764 0.7% No No Rd Blvd Note(s): *Refer to Table 3 from this report. **2024 Projected Volume = 2024 background (refer to Table 4) + Project Volume added. a 0 a 0 0 3 0 0 a� r r m y 0 N O N r- N LO 0 t— a� a� c m E t 0 a c m E t U 0 r Q Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 12 Packet Pg. 96 9.A.12 Shadowwood PUDA — TIS — May 2020 Table 613 Roadway Link Level of Service (LOS) — With Project in the Year 2024 — Proposed PUDA Distribution 2019 Peak Roadway Min LOS Min LOS CC 2024 Peak %Vol Dir, Peak Link, Peak exceeded exceeded Roadway AUIR Roadway Link Dir, Peak Hr Capacity Hr Dir, Peak Hr without with Link Link ID Location Volume Impact by Capacity (Project Vol Project? Project? # w/Project** Project Volume Added)* Yes/No Yes/No Rattlesnake Santa 79.0 Hammock Rd to 3,100 (SB) SB-7 1,207 0.2% No No Barbara Blvd Polly Ave Santa Polly Ave to 79.0 3,100 (SB) SB —14 1,214 0.5% No No Barbara Blvd Whitaker Rd Santa Whitaker Rd to 79.0 3,100 (SB) SB — 71 1,271 2.3% No No Barbara Blvd Davis Blvd Rattlesnake County Barn Rd to Hammock 74.0 Santa Barbara 2,900 (EB) EB — 29 849 1.0% No No Rd Blvd Rattlesnake Santa Barbara Hammock 75.0 2,900 (EB) EB —17 770 0.6% No No Blvd to Skyway Dr Rd Rattlesnake Skyway Dr to Hammock 75.0 2,900 (EB) EB —10 763 0 0.3/ No No Collier Blvd Rd Note(s): *Refer to Table 3 from this report. **2024 Projected Volume = 2024 background (refer to Table 4) + Project Volume added Policy 5.1 of the Collier County Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan (GMP) states that "the County Commission shall review all rezone petitions, SRA designation applications, conditional use petitions, and proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) affecting the overall countywide density or intensity of permissible development, with consideration of their impact on the overall County transportation system, and shall not approve any petition or application that would directly access a deficient roadway segment as identified in the current AUIR or if it impacts an adjacent roadway segment that is deficient as identified in the current AUIR, or which significantly impacts a roadway segment or adjacent roadway segment that is currently operating and/or is projected to operate below an adopted Level of Service Standard within the five year AUIR planning period, unless specific mitigating stipulations are also approved." Alternative Traffic Distribution Scenarios The concurrency analysis presented in this traffic study evaluates the project traffic distribution as approved in the Shadowwood PUD Ordinance, which allows for 100% of the project traffic to use the existing internal roadway, Skyway Drive, in order to access the external roadway network. The distribution presented for the proposed PUDA project provides a more evenly distributed Q d 0 0 3 0 0 z v rn r m y 0 N O N r- N LO O H a� a� c as E 0 a c a� E U 0 r r Q Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 13 Packet Pg. 97 9.A.12 Shadowwood PUDA — TIS — May 2020 access to the project parcel by allowing connection to the local roadways west of the project as well as access onto Skyway Drive. Several different distribution scenarios were considered for the proposed PUDA project. The traffic distribution associated with the 11-27-2019 Shadowwood PUDA TIS is illustrated in Appendix D: Alternative Traffic Distribution Scenarios. Additional traffic distribution scenarios were created and evaluated to understand the impact the proposed PUDA project has on the surrounding roadway network with different access configurations (see Appendix D). Due to the inherent low -speed nature of the local neighborhood streets, consideration should be given to utilizing traffic calming devices on Whitaker Road, Polly Avenue and Adkins Avenue in the vicinity of the PUDA project, as applicable. Improvement Analysis Based on the results illustrated within this traffic analysis, the proposed project is a significant traffic generator on Santa Barbara Boulevard for the roadway network at this location when utilizing the proposed PUDA traffic distribution. The analyzed roadway network facilities have sufficient capacity to accommodate the proposed project within the AUIR 5-year planning period. The maximum total trip generation for Tract E shall not exceed 187 two-way, PM peak hour net trips based on the use codes in the ITE Trip Generation Manual for trip generation rates in effect at the time of the application for SDP/SDPA or subdivision plat approval. A detailed evaluation of the proposed site access point and a concurrency analysis of the impacted road network will be performed at the time of site development permitting/platting to determine turn lane requirements and capacity availability, as applicable. Mitigation of Impact The developer proposes to pay the appropriate Collier County Road Impact Fee as building permits are issued for the project. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 14 Packet Pg. 98 9.A.12 Shadowwood PUDA — TIS — May 2020 Appendix A: Methodology Meeting Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA p 1 15 Packet Pg. 99 9.A.12 Shadowwood PUDA — TIS — May 2020 Christopher Hagan From: SawyerMichael <Michael.Sawyer@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Friday, May 10, 2019 12:53 PM To: Christopher Hagan Subject: RE: Shadowwood PDI to PUDA Chris, Thanks. Please use this email as meeting your TIS Methodology meeting requirements. Please note on the TIS coversheet that the fees will be collected at time of PUD submittal. Let me know of any questions as you move forward. Thanks and have a great weekend, Michael Sawyer Principal Planner Growth Management Department Transportation Planning 2685 South Horseshoe Drive, Suite 103 Naples, Florida 34104 239-252-2926 micltael.sawyer, reolliercounlyfl.Vov From: Christopher Hagan <Chris@haganeng.com> Sent: Friday, May 10, 2019 12:46 PM To: SawyerMichael <Michael.Sawyer@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: RE: Shadowwood PDI to PUDA Mike, This email is submitted to document our Friday May 10 conversation regarding the referenced project. The purpose of our conversation was to discuss the traffic impact statement methodology for the referenced project. We discussed how the project has evolved from a simple PDI into a PUD amendment. During our discussion it was determined that the traffic impact statement could be relatively simple in that it would take the existing subdivision, review the available units and the undeveloped portion of the site to determine a build out unit count and traffic demand. Two alternatives should be reviewed: • If no access were provided other than what is in the original PUD (Rattlesnake Hammock Road) • Utilizing the existing County public road rights of way to disperse the trip distribution We confirmed that the existing Polly Avenue, Atkins Avenue, Sunset Boulevard and Whitaker Road have all been recently paved and adjoin the subject property. These are public road rights of way and the land development code requires that we connect to these to provide for traffic interconnection and trip distribution on Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 16 Packet Pg. 100 9.A.12 Shadowwood PUDA — TIS — May 2020 the network. f will meet with the owners on Monday and get a determination of the proposed unit data going forward and we will work on the traffic impact statement based on this criteria. By email response please confirm that this is accurate and correctly reflects our discussion. If so this will document our traffic study methodology meeting on the project. Thanks for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Chris Hagan © HAGAN ENGINEERING Hagan Engineering 1250 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 203B Naples, FL 34102 (t) 239-228-7742 (c) 239-951-9239 Chris'alHaganEnn.com www.haizaneng.com From: SawyerMichael [ma !Ito:Michael.Sawy,er(fcollie rcquntVfl.gov] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2019 10:56 AM To: Christopher Hagan <Chris@haganeng com> Subject: RE: Shadowwood PDI to PUDA Chris, I have no knowledge of this petition change. I approved the original PDI request on 3-15-19 and have not been part of any of the issues -discussion below. If zoning has determined that there are transportation impacts then I would make sure they outline those impacts for you. From my departments perspective we can of course review a standard TIS that would outline those impacts however if my memory is correct there were no additional dwelling units proposed (hence original PD] designation) so the TIS would be a simply small scale showing no impacts? Again if Zoning needs to document local road impacts then perhaps a simple standard TIS that showed the trip count based on the existing -allowed residential uses, PM Peak Hour trips, and a standard distribution map-calcs; in this case onto the local roads first and then onto the collectors. If the issue is serious enough perhaps including both with -without proposed changes which would likely simply show a reduction at the existing access and increases at the proposed new accesses on the local roads. Sorry I can't offer additional guidance ... I'm as much in the dark honestly on this one. Let me know of follow-up questions. Thanks, Michael Sawyer Principal Planner Growth Management Department Transportation Planning 2695 South Horseshoe Drive, Suite 103 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 17 Packet Pg. 101 9.A.12 Shadowwood PUDA — TIS — May 2020 Naples, Florida 34104 239-252-2926 michael.sawyer(4�.colliercount +} fl.gov From: Christopher Hagan <Chris@haganeng.com> Sent: Friday, May 10, 201910:30 AM To: SawyerMichael <Michael.Sawyer@colliercountVfl.gov> Subject: FW: 5hadowwood PDI to PUDA Mike, Can you please send me something in writing that outlines the traffic study requirements associated with the referenced project. I'd like to understand how you want us to handle the units, zoning, distribution, and other considerations. I have a 3 PM. meeting at the County this afternoon regarding another project, I would be happy to meet with you before or after if it works for your schedule. Thanks for your consideration, I look forward to hearing from you. Sincerely, Chris Hagan © H AGAN ENGINEERING Hagan Engineering 1250 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 203B Naples, FL 34102 (t) 239-228-7742 (c) 239-851-8239 Chris Ida€ anEn ,.corn www.haizaneng.com From: FinnTimothy [ma ilto:TimothV.Finn@ colliercountyfl.gov] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2019 8:48 AM To: Christopher Hagan <Chris@haganeng.com>; BellowsRay <Ray.Bellowsl@col liercountvfl.eov>; SmithCamden <Camden.Smith@col lie rcountyfl.gov>; MartinezGilbert <Gilbert.Martinez@colliercountVfl.gov> Cc: BosiMichael<Michael.Bosi@collie rcountyfl.gov>; Clyde Quinby <c.ouinbyCu.Dao1.com>; 'Bill Barton' <wlbarton39@gmai1.com>; johncaskeV@aol.com: Robert M. Buckel <RMB@wbclawVers.com> Subject: RE: 5hadowwood PDI to PUDA Hi Chris, Please see responses below in bold red. Timothy Finn, AICP Principal Planner C o er Cousity Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 18 Packet Pg. 102 9.A.12 Shadowwood PUDA — TIS — May 2020 Zoning Division NOTE: New Email Address as of 1210912017: Timoth .Finrnslcolliercount fl. ov 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples Florida 34104 Phone: 239,252.4312 Tell us how we are doing by taking our Zoning Division Survey at htto:J11bit.ly/Co]IierZanine. Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From: Christopher Hagan <Chris@haganeng.com> Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2019 8:41 AM To: BellowsRay <Ray.BellowsLd)colliercountyfl.aov>; FinnTimothy <Timothy.Finn@colliercountvfl.eov> Cc: BosiMichael <Michael.BosiPcolliercountyfl.gov>; Clyde Quinby <c.puinby@aol.com>; 'Bill Barton' <wlbarton39@gmaiLcom>; iohncaskey@aol.com; Robert M. Buckel <RMB@wbdawyers.com> Subject: Shadowwood PDI to l Gentlemen, I understand from our telephone conversations that it is the County's opinion that our project requires a PUDA instead of a PDT. In order to document and confirm this please provide us a written outline of the reasons and requirements. We would like to have some direction in writing from you all that shows that the changes and adjustments we are making are per your direction. We want to be able to confirm these requirements. If you could please provide the following I would appreciate it: • Why the initial PDI application needs to be converted to a PUDA? Upon completion of the multifamily residential in Tract E within the ShadowWood PUD, there ]s the perception among the neighborhood residents of additional trips and traffic on the following local roads: Polly Ave, Whitaker Road, and Adkins Ave. These additional trips were not contemplated in the Ill original adoption along these local roads. There was considerable opposition at the NIM on this issue. It is staff's opinion that this petition be categorized under LDC Section 10.02A3i;l "A substantial increase in the impacts of the development which may include, but are not limited to increases in traffic generation; changes in traffic circulation; or impacts on other public facilities." As such, this change is substantial and will be deemed a PUDA. .If it is a PUDA, is it insubstantial, minor or major? substantial Who made this determination? GMD staff including Mike Bosi, Ray Bellows, and myself • What specific issues led to this decision? Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 19 Packet Pg. 103 9.A.12 Shadowwood PUDA — TIS — May 2020 See answer to first question • What application requirement changes can be expected with the permitting change? There will not be additional costs from this conversion to a PUDA. You will still need to pay any additional advertising costs that may be incurred. We will ask that you fill out the PUDA application which is available on the county website and submit a traffic study. Please contact Mike Sawyer (239-252- 2925) from Transportation on the requirements for this traffic study. By better understanding these items we can move forward on the project with the knowledge of how and why this determination was made. We need to document that this is the requirement by County staff and/or review as opposed to being voluntarily modifications being provided by the owner/applicant. I appreciate your consideration regarding this request and look forward to getting your justification in writing. Sincerely, Chris Hagan © HAGAN ENGINEERING Hagan Engineering 1250 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 203B Naples, FL 34102 (t) 239-228-7742 (c) 239-851-8239 Chris(Zr?HaganEng.com www.haganeng.com Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 20 Packet Pg. 104 Shadowwood PUDA — TIS — May 2020 9.A.12 Appendix B: PUD Master Plan Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 21 Packet Pg. 105 9.A.12 Shadowwood PUDA — TIS — May 2020 Z o, p a tOa a NOOWWtlH 3NVNS3I11V2! 5� F ro 1 rc H _ z U U 02 'and su?'iPV K A a S �o o IL a m IL W L � m❑ O c � 0 a Pb ja�el!4M m a Q T 0 a �s �z Q D d 0 0 0 R t d N d a Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 22 Packet Pg. 106 9.A.12 Shadowwood PUDA — TIS — May 2020 Appendix C: Trip Generation Calculations Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 23 Packet Pg. 107 9.A.12 Shadowwood PUDA — TIS — May 2020 Land Use: 220 Multifamily Housing (Low -Rise) Description Low-rise multifamily housing includes apartments, townhouses, and condominiums located within the same building with at least three other dwelling units and that have one or two levels (floors). Multifamily housing (mid -rise) (Land Use 221), multifamily housing (high-rise) (Land Use 222), and off -campus student apartment (Land Use 225) are related land uses. Additional Data In prior editions of Trip Generation Manual, the low-rise multifamily housing sites were further divided into rental and condominium categories. An investigation of vehicle trip data found no clear differences in trip making patterns between the rental and condominium sites within the ITE database. As more data are compiled for future editions, this land use classification can be reinvestigated. For the three sites for which both the number of residents and the number of occupied dwelling units were available, there were an average of 2.72 residents per occupied dwelling unit. For the two sites for which the numbers of both total dwelling units and occupied dwelling units were available, an average of 96.2 percent of the total dwelling units were occupied. This land use included data from a wide variety of units with different sizes, price ranges, locations, and ages. Consequently, there was a wide variation in trips generated within this category. Other factors, such as geographic location and type of adjacent and nearby development, may also have had an effect on the site trip generation. Time -of -day distribution data for this land use are presented in Appendix A. For the 10 general urban/suburban sites with data, the overall highest vehicle volumes during the AM and PM on a weekday were counted between 7:15 and 8:15 a.m. and 4:45 and 5:45 p.m., respectively. For the one site with Saturday data, the overall highest vehicle volume was counted between 9:45 and 10:45 a.m. For the one site with Sunday data, the overall highest vehicle volume was counted between 11:45 a.m. and 12:45 p.m. For the one dense multi -use urban site with 24-hour count data, the overall highest vehicle volumes during the AM and PM on a weekday were counted between 7:00 and 8:00 a.m. and 6:15 and 7:15 p.m., respectively. For the three sites for which data were provided for both occupied dwelling units and residents, there was an average of 2.72 residents per occupied dwelling unit. The average numbers of person trips per vehicle trip at the five general urban/suburban sites at which both person trip and vehicle trip data were collected were as follows: • 1.13 during Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, one hour between 7 and 9 a.m. • 1.21 during Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, one hour between 4 and 6 p.m. W Trip Generation Manual 10th Edition • Volume 2: Data • Residential (Land Uses 200-299) 29 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g P 1 24 Packet Pg. 108 9.A.12 Shadowwood PUDA - TIS - May 2020 The sites were surveyed in the 1980s, the 1990s, the 2000s, and the 2010s in British Columbia (CAN), California, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Maine, Maryland, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, Ontario, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, and Washington. It is expected that the number of bedrooms and number of residents are likely correlated to the number of trips generated by a residential site. Many of the studies included in this land use did not indicate the total number of bedrooms. To assist in the future analysis of this land use, it is important that this information be collected and included in trip generation data submissions. Source Numbers 168, 187, 188, 204, 211, 300, 305, 306, 319, 320, 321, 357, 390, 412, 418, 525, 530, 571, 579, 583, 864, 868, 869, 870, 896, 903, 918, 946, 947, 948, 951 30 Trip Generation Manual 10th Edition • Volume 2: Data • Residential (Land Uses 200-299) ,{`- Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA p 1 25 Packet Pg. 109 9.A.12 Shadowwood PUDA — TIS — May 2020 Project Information Project Name: Shadowwood PUDA No: Date: 05/01/2020 City: State/Province: Zip/Postal Code: Country: Client Name: Analyst's Name: DTD Edition: Trip Gen Manual, 10th Ed Land Use Size Weekday AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Entry Exit Entry Exit Entry Exit 220 - Multifamily Housing (Low -Rise) (General Urban/Suburban) 364 Dwelling Units 1356 1355 37 126 118 69 Reduction 0 0 0 0 0 0 Internal 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass -by 0 0 0 0 0 0 Non -pass -by 1356 1355 37 126 118 69 Total 1356 1355 37 126 118 69 Total Reduction 0 0 0 0 0 0 Totallnternal 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Pass -by 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Non -pass -by 1356 1355 37 126 118 69 PERIOD SETTING Analysis Name: Weekday Project Name: Shadowwood PUDA No: Date: 5/1 /2020 City: State/Province: Zip/Postal Code: Country: Client Name: Analyst's Name: DTD Edition: Trip Gen Manual, 10th Ed Land Use Independent Variable Size Time Period Method Entry Exit Total 220 - Multifamily Dwelling Units 364 Weekday Best Fit (LIN) 1356 1355 2711 Housing (Low -Rise) T = 7.56 (X)+-40.86 50% 50% (General Urban/Suburban) Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA p 1 26 Packet Pg. 110 Shadowwood PUDA — TIS — May 2020 9.A.12 FE7 Analysis Name: Project Name: Date: StatelProvince: Country: Analyst's Name: Land Use 220 - Multifamily Housing (Low -Rise) (General Urban/Suburban ) Analysis Name: Project Name: Date: State/Province: Country: Analyst's Name: Land Use 220 - Multifamily Housing (Low -Rise) (General Urban/Suburban) PERIOD SETTING AM Peak Hour Shadowwood PUDA 5/1 /2020 DTD Independent Variable Dwelling Units No: City: Zip/Postal Code: Client Name: Edition: Trip Gen Manual, 10th Ed Size Time Period Method Entry Exit Total 364 Weekday, Peak Best Fit (LOG) 37 126 163 Hour of Adjacent Ln(T) = 0.95Ln(X) 23% 77% Street Traffic, +-0.51 One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. PERIOD SETTING PM Peak Hour Shadowwood PUDA 5/1 /2020 DTD Independent Variable Dwelling Units No: City: ZiplPostal Code: Client Name: Edition: Trip Gen Manual, 10th Ed Size Time Period Method Entry Exit Total 364 Weekday, Peak Best Fit (LOG) 118 69 187 Hour of Adjacent Ln(T) = 0.89Ln(X) 63% 37% Street Traffic, +-0.02 One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. Q d O O 3 O t N v rn r r N d 0 N O N r- N LO 0 H O a� t, r c m E t a c m E t U a r r Q Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA p 1 27 Packet Pg. 111 9.A.12 Shadowwood PUDA — TIS — May 2020 Appendix D: Alternative Traffic Distribution Scenarios Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 28 Packet Pg. 112 Shadowwood PUDA — TIS — May 2020 9.A.12 ( T __C IHavEn 4? %io Waco two Goff Club L O Jock 9 Whlliker Rd e cd � 0 n 40 % pCdI A-w, Calun PaEma Nuns 40% �i:,unk n 60 % -1% do- �096 � Sh adQvwwood 4? R�t#lesri�ke.< Hammock C P Yr err 43-- G.7n frd untry Club ManorCiar� -1 11h vir-es at Lel44 2596 9 59(0 lr�sira Apnmr,ts Scenario 3 - Distribution by Percentage { HOA Loafl Specialists Based on 11-7-01 TIS ` �* d3 Florida 9 Sierra Collega Park A Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a i 29 Packet Pg. 113 Shadowwood PUDA — TIS — May 2020 9.A.12 o Jock N Enter-71, Ex-41 C F1VfY 41hlaakerPon <-> en Enter-71, Exit-41 RdY9 WadD 100 Enter-47, Exit-28 Golf <->- Club T Enter-47, Exit-28 Calun Palms Nuts Enter-47 Exit-28 v 't. -% r Enter-47, Exit-28 Shadovwwood 9 Rct#leSna" Hammock 0 Parw_ur. Ifa ' u-liryClub Enter-29, Ex -17 Enter-18, Exit-11 hspir8 Ap-ariments - �fy Scenario 3 - Based on 11 -27-2019 TI S HOA Loan Specialists Distribution bV PM Peak Hour Florida 9 Sierr81 College Park Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a - 1 30 Packet Pg. 114 Shadowwood PUDA — TIS — May 2020 9.A.12 Lo Jack I 45% __c ()$ FIaVeFk WhlaekerRo <-> 6096 m ' ~7 9 W0 0 6Q0 ¢ a Adkins Aw.. Pogy Ave Golf 10 Club �klt Fc I n i�rraY. }C� Calun Palms Nursery 9 I-Wlow Ur v 't. Shadovwwood 9 Rc##lesnake*- Hammock 40°Xo P�w_ur. If a U-liry Club manorcare -leal#!1 ,rites at LeIy Palms 7% Ir�sp�r 1096 �1#s Scenario 4 - Distribution by Percentage HOA Loan Speda isis with Whitaker Access and Skyway Access Florida College Park Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 31 Packet Pg. 115 9.A.12 Shadowwood PUDA — TIS — May 2020 Lo Jock Project Enter-53, Exit-31 C (t) HavEn WhIlakerFrd <—> Enter-71, Exit-41 {, Enter-71, Exit-41 Enter-10, Exit-10 Enter-47, Exit-28 h Alrpark Pon, Aye er d Goll Y Club Ln Calun Palms Nursery-Shadovwwood H:;Ileyq n, s Harnmock Enter-47, Exit-28 PAekurr Frainrepa:, DO tafltry Club -lealth *--*Mprices at Lelp Palms T <—> Enter-30, Exit-1 7 Er} Enter-12, E�7 Enter-35, Exit- 21 College Park A Scenario 4 - Distribution by Percentage 4 HOA Loon Specialists with Whitaker Access and Skyway Access F , Florida Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a 1 32 Packet Pg. 116 Shadowwood PUDA — TIS — May 2020 9.A.12 Lo Jack T FI UN __C s Haven whlaaker P Fro -% m fyra� w°0¢ a 4096 Adkins Av_ Pady Ave Club yJ�C5. �1Fc I ri iMeraF. 521 Calun Palms Nursery I -Willow dr 't. n Shadovrwood 4? Hammock C aY.mrr 4r��n�rGqh f•u " rivy Club MarwCiar �e th ViCE!5 at wt Fan Y5% 15{Xo Insplra Apartments 9 Scenario 5 - Distribution by Percentage h HGA Load Specialists with Whitaker Access Only ��' ,. Florida 4? SierraColleg3 bark A Q d 0 0 3 0 z r d V 0 N O N r- N LO O N c m E a E a a Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a 1 33 Packet Pg. 117 Shadowwood PUDA — TIS — May 2020 9.A.12 Lo Jack 4) 11 Enter-71, Exit-41 _C HaviEri 9 WhIlakerRd <> Enter-118, Exit-69 Enter-118, Ex -69 m wadi¢ d rater-4 , E� wing So Adkins rAve isms 6— '4 NAY Ave d Goff CAQ Club yJ�IIC'S: ]rFc I n Cv cr�i: ;il Calusa Palma Nurser}' 9 Shada+ywood 9 H!;Ilrr.r rah Hammock Y 0 Re�urr Iivnn—;. 6u ufItryClub -le lifl , Aces at . Enter-29, Exit-17 Enter-18, Exit-11 lnsplr8 Apartmefl#s 9 Scenario 5 - Distribution by PM Peak Hour HOA Loan Specialists with Whitaker Access Only p Florida Project Alrpsrk 9 Sierr8 Colleg. Park A Q 0 a 0 0 3 0 0 0 r d V 0 N O N 1— N rO 0 r N a� c as a E a a Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a - 1 34 Packet Pg. 118 Is ss William L. Barton, LLC: 1061Vloorings Park Drive Naples, FL 34105 239441-7941 dbarton39@gmalL com February 13, 2019 Timothy Finn, Principal Planner Zoning Division Collier County Growth Management Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 Re: Shadow Wood PUD Insubstantial Change Petition PL20190000259 Location: Section 16, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida Dear Mr. Finn. The purpose of this correspondence is to submit a proposed insubstantial modification to the Shadow Wood PUD Master Plan to provide for ingress and egress to the last remaining development parcel in the Planned Unit Development. As required by LDC Section 10.02.13 E., and Code of Laws Sections 2-83 thru 2-90, Chapter 3 G.3.of the Administrative Code, the following documentation accompanies the Insubstantial Change to a PUD Application (PDI). • Property Owners Disclosure Form; Shadow Wood PUD Ordinances No.82-49, and 0843; • Shadow Wood Tract E Survey; ' Shadow Wood Tract E Legal Description; Existing Shadow Wood PUD Master Plan; • Proposed Shadow Wood PUD Master Plan; • Insubstantial PUD Amendment Findings • Historic Aerial Photographs (Exhibit 1) • Condo Plat Book 4, Page 46 - Wing South Private Villas Unit I (Exhibit 2) • Neighborhood Exhibit (Exhibit 3) • Addressing Checklist; • Location Map; • Pre -application meeting notes of February 11, 2019; • Affidavit of Authorization; • Compact Disk of electronic files composing the application. The following narrative will: explain the history of the existing PUD Zoning District, describe the proposed insubstantial change to the PUD Master Plan, and provide a basis for approval to support the requested action of the Hearing Examiner. It is noted that there have been no public hearings on the subject property in the preceding year. Based on available historical information, the general area of the PUD remained undeveloped until the late 1960s when the airstrip was constructed to provide fly -in access to the first subdivision- ; like development platted in 1972 as Wing South Private Villas Unit 1, a condominium plat. That single-family neighborhood, which is currently zoned RSF4, is surrounded by the Shadow Wood PUD that was adopted by the Board of County Commissioners in July of 1982. Please refer to the historic aerial photographs labeled Exhibit 1. The PUD Master Plan adopted with the original PUD Zoning District depicts development areas south of Wing South Private Villas Unit 1 to include single-family development oriented along the west side of the airstrip, and multifamily uses proposed to the south, and also to the north of Wing South Private Villas Unit 1 on a large development tract. Subsequent to the approval of original PUD, two multifamily development projects were constructed on lands platted as Shadow Wood Villas (P.B. 23, Pgs. 8647), and Shadow Wood Park (P.B. 16, Pgs. 26-29, Replat P.B. 2510 Pgs. 95-99), as were single-family homes constructed on lots platted in Shadowwood (P.B. 19, Pgs. 7879), and Wing South Airpark Extension (P.B. 61, Pgs. 20-21). To the north of Wing South Private Villas Unit 1 is another multi -family development tract (Tract E) within the Shadow Wood PUD Zoning District and is yet undeveloped. It is ingress and egress to this approved development tract that is the subject of this insubstantial zoning exhibit modification. In July of 1982, residential development neighboring the PUD lands was sparse, and was slowly being improved with single-family homes. As stated previously, single-family homes were being constructed on lots defined through the Wing South Private Villas Unit 1 Condominium Plat. It was understood that this subdivision would be interconnected to lands north and south as is evidenced through the defined 50400t access easements terminating at the northern and southern plat boundaries. See Exhibit 2, Wing South Private Villas Unit 1. This understanding was continued, and carried forward through the adoption of the Shadow Wood PUD where the developing Wing South Private Villas would be integrated into the traffic circulation of the land uses approved in the PUD as evidenced in the PUD Master Plan. The 1982 PUD Master Plan is mostly illegible due to age and multitudes of duplication, therefore, the PUD Master Plan updated in 2008 as a result of the adoption of Shadow Wood PUD Ordinance 0843 will be the reference and instrument proposed for modification as a result of the approval of this Insubstantial PUD Amendment. All residential development entitled through the adoption of the PUD Zoning District was reviewed and approved by Collier County utilizing the development standards contained within the PUD Ordinances, the Zoning Ordinance 82-2, as amended, as well as the Land Development Shadow Wood PDI Application Petition PL20190000259 Page 2 of 4 Code Ordinance 0441, as amended. After meeting with Zoning Director Bosl on December 18, 2018, it was determined that access to multi -family Tract E must be provided for on the PUD Master Plan not only from the south, but also from the West allowing interconnection to Santa Barbara Boulevard. Director Bosi asked that prior to development order approvals for Tract E land uses may be granted, the PUD Master Plan be modified through the Insubstantial PUD Amendment process to add schematic ingress/egress arrows to the western boundary of Tract E. Therefore, please find the proposed Shadow Wood PUD Master Plan proposed to be adopted by the Hearing Examiner at a public hearing date to be determined. While all residential development approved i in the Shadow Wood PUD have been found to be in compliance with the Collier County Growth Management Plan at the time development order requests were approved, this Insubstantial PUD Amendment will bring the PUD into greater conformance with the GMP by implementing the following GMP Policies: Future Land Use Element Policy 7.1: The County shall encourage developers and property owners to connect their properties to fronting collector and arterial roads, except where no such connection can be made without violating intersection spacing requirements of the Land Development Code. Future Land Use Element Policy 7.2: The County shall encourage internal accesses or loop roads in an effort to help reduce vehicle congestion on nearby collector and arterial roads and minimize the need for traffic signals. Future Land Use Element Policy 7.3: All new and existing developments shall be encouraged to connect their local streets and/or interconnection points with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless of land use type. Transportation Element Policy 9.3: The County shall require, wherever feasible, the interconnection of local streets between developments to facilitate convenient movement throughout the road network. The LDC shall identify the circumstances and conditions that would require the interconnection of neighboring developments, and shall also develop standards and criteria for the safe interconnection of such Local streets. The proposed insubstantial addition to the PUD Master Plan to provide for ingress and egress to Tract E will resolve a potential danger in traffic circulation wherein the roadway improved within Wing South Private Villas is also used as a taxiway for private aircraft transiting to and from home hangers and the private airstrip. Further, the County recently completed Shadow Wood PDI Application Petition PL20190000259 Page 3 of 4 stormwater conveyance improvements that encumber approximately 70 feet of Lite northern, southern and eastern boundaries of Tract E. These physical encumbrances will limit the opportunity for vehicular connection to the Wing South Private Villas roadways as well as to Adkins Avenue. The attached Neighborhood Exhibit (Exhibit 3) depicts the public roadways neighboring the PUD. The residential land uses approved in the Shadow Wood PUD, being vested land uses, were contemplated in the design and improvement of Santa Barbara Boulevard; therefore, amending a zoning exhibit to provide for access to that roadway from the public and private easements connecting to Tract E should be considered perfunctory. Finally, it should be understood that at the Collier County Planning Commission public hearing on June 27, 2008, Planning Commissioner Schiffer inquired why the PUD Amendment request being reviewed at that time did not provide for interconnections to the west. The Commission did discuss the matter at some length, but the land use request at hand at the time did not avail the Planning Commission an opportunity to remedy the access limitation. The property owner has the right to connect to the public roadway system. Only the absence of directional arrows on the Shadow Wood PUD Master Plan limits the connection from zoning perspective. It is also noted that during petition pre-app meeting of February 11, 2019, Mr. Scott Stone, Assistant County Attorney, pointed out that paragraph 5.2.F. of the property PUD, which reads "To protect the integrity of the Planned Unit Development, residential neighborhood, the only access road shall be the private road as shown on the Master Plan with an exception for temporary construction roads.", is contrary to the provisions of the Collier County Growth Management Plan and should be stricken. Applicant has no objection to that request. Please distribute this Petition for staff review and scheduling for action by the Collier County Hearing Examiner. Sincerely, W. L. Barton, P.E. Enclosures Shadow Wood PDI Application Petition PL20190000259 Page 4 of 4 CO er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.collieremnet 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Application for a Public Hearing for PUD Rezone, Amendment to PUD or PETITION NO PROJECT NAME DATE PROCESSED PUD to PUD Rezone To be completed by staff �] PUD Rezone (PUDZ): LDC subsection 10.02.13 A.-F., Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code ❑✓ Amendment to PUD (PUDA): LDC subsection 10.02.13 E. and Ch. 3 G. 2 of the Administrative Code PUD to PUD Rezone (PUDR): LDC subsection 10.02.13 A.-F. APPLICANT CONTACT fNFORMATION Name of Property Owner(s�: SD Corporation of Naples, InC. Name of Applicant if different than owner: . Address: 2150 Goo dlette Road N. City: Telephone: 239-552-4100 Cell: E-Mail Address: rmb@wbclawers.com N aples state: Florida ZIP: 34102 Fax: 239-263-7922 Name of Agent: Clyde Quinby Firm: Clyde C. Quinby Realty, Inc. Address: 2400 Coach House Ln. City: Naples state: FL ZIP: 34105 239-261-1166 Telephone: Cell: Fax. &Mail Address: Be aware that Collier County has lobbyist regulations. Guide yourself accordingly and ensure that you are in compliance with these regulations. February 1, 2019 Page 1 of 11 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT ►rvw%Fv.coIhereov.net Coger County REZONE REQUEST 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE MAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 This application is requesting a rezone from: Zoning districts) to the Present Use of the Property: zoning districts}. Vacant/disturbed Proposed Use (or range of uses) of the property: Original PUD Name: Shadowwood PUD Residential Development Ordinance No.: 82-49, as amended by 08-43 PROPERTY INFORMATION On a separate sheet attached to the application, provide a detailed legal description of the property covered by the application. If the request involves changes to more than one zoning district, the applicant shall include a separate legal description for property involved in each districts t, The applicant shalt submit 4 copies of a recent survey (completed within the last six months, maximum 1" to 400' scale), if required to do so at the pre -application meeting; and • The applicant is responsible for supplying the correct legal description. If questions arise concerning the legal description, an engineer's certification or sealed survey may be required. Section/Township/Range: 16 / 50S 126E Lot: Block: Subdivision: Metes & Bounds Description: See attached Exhibit A Plat Book: Page #: Size of Property: Property I.D. Number: 00418640007 ft. _ Total Sq. Ft. Acres: 77.98 Address/ General Location of Subject Property: The eastern terminus of Whitaker Road and Adkin's Ave. PUD District (refer to LDC subsection 2.03.06 C): ❑ Commercial Residential ❑Community Facilities ❑ Mixed Use ❑ Other: ❑ Industrial February 1, 2019 Page � of 11 Co er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 AD) CENT ZONING AND LAND USE Zonin N � A, Agriculture &PUD S A, Agriculture & RSF=4 E PUD, CFPUD & PUD W A, Agriculture Land Use Undeveloped &Conservation Single-family neighborhoods Private Airstrip & Conservation Single-family neighborhood tf the owner of the subject property owns contiguous property please provide a detailed legal description of the entire contiguous property on a separate sheet attached to the application. Section/Township/Range: j_ / lot: Block: Subdivision: Plat Book: Page #: Property I.D. Number: Metes &Bounds Description: ASSOCIATIONS Required: List all registered Home Owner Associations) that could be affected by this petition. Provide additional sheets if necessary. Information can be found on the Board of County Commissioner's website at http:i/www collierkuv.ttet/iiidex.aspx?page=774. Name of Homeowner Association: Lely Resort Master Property Owner's Association Mailing Address: 2639 Professional Circle #101 City; Naples State: FL Narne of Homeowner Association: Naples Club Estates Homeowners Name of Homeowner Association: Naples Heritage Golf &Country Club, Inc. Mailing Address: 8150 Heritage Club Way City; Naples State: FL ZIP Zlp; 34109 ZIP: 34112 Name of Homeowner Association: Naples Lakes Country Club Homeowners Association, Inc. Mailing Address: 4784 Naples Lakes Blvd. City; Naples State: FL Zlp; 34112 Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: City: State: ZIP: February 1, 2019 Page 3 of 11 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colher ov.net Co#er County EVALUATION CRITERIA 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Pursuant to LDC subsections 10.02.13 B, 10.02.08 F and Chapter 3 G, of the Administrative Code, staff's analysis and recommendation to the Planning Commission, and the Planning Commission's recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners shall be based upon consideration of the applicable criteria. On a separate sheet attached to the application, provide a narrative statement describing the rezone request with specific reference to the criteria below. Include any backup materials and documentation in support of the request. a. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. b. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the county attorney. c. Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives and policies of the Growth Management Plan. (This is to include identifying what Sub -district, policy or other provision allows the requested uses/density, and fully explaining/addressing all criteria or conditions of that Sub -district, policy or other provision.) d. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. e. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. f. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. g. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. h. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications of justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. Deed Restrictions: The County is legally precluded from enforcing deed restrictions; however, many communities have adopted such restrictions. You may wish to contact the civic or property owners association in the area for which this use is being requested in order to ascertain whether or not the request is affected by existing deed restrictions. February 1, 2019 Page 4 of 11 Coffer County 00 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Previous land use petitions on the subject property: To your knowledge, has a public hearing been held on this property within the last year? If so, what was the nature of that hearing? No O##icial Interpretations or Zoning Verifications: To your knowledge, has there been an official interpretation or zoning verification rendered on this property within the last year? ❑ Yes # No if so please provide copies. PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIREMENTS This land use petition requires a Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM), pursuant to Chapter 3 E. of the Administrative Code and LDC section 10,03,06, Following the NIM, the applicant will submit a written summary and any commitments that have been made at the meeting. Refer to Chapter 8 B. A the Administrative Code for the NIM procedural requirements. Chapter advertising Board's 8 of sign(s) final the Administrative Code requires that after final action is taken by the action on this item, please remove all the Board public applicant must remove their public hearing of County Commissioners. Based on the hearing advertising sign(s) immediately. RECORDING OF DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS Within 30 days of adoption of the Ordinance, the owner or developer (specify namej at their expense shall record in the Public Records of Collier County a Memorandum of Understanding of Developer Commitments or Notice of Developer Commitments that contains the legal description of the property that is the subject of the land use petition and contains each and every commitment of the owner or developer specified in the Ordinance. The Memorandum or Notice shall be in form acceptable to the County and shall comply with the recording requirements of Chapter 695, FS. A recorded copy of the Memorandum or Notice shall be provided to the Collier County Planned Unit Development Monitoring staff within 15 days of recording of said Memorandum or Notice. LDC subsection 10.02.08 D This application will be considered "open" when the determination of "sufficiency" has been made and the application is assigned a petition processing number. The application will be considered "closed" when the petitioner withdraws the application through written notice or ceases to supply necessary information to continue processing or otherwise actively pursue the rezoning, amendment or change, for a period of 6 months. An application deemed "closed" will not receive further processing and an application "closed" through inactivity shall be deemed withdrawn. An application deemed "closed" may be re -opened by submission of a new application, repayment of all application fees and the grant of a determination of "sufficiency". Further review of the request will be subject to the then current code. February 1, 2019 Page 5 of 11 Coter County ow COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 STATEMENT OF UTILITY PROVISIONS Name of Applicant(s�: Address: Telephone: E-Mail Address: FOR PUD REZONE REQUEST EMENE APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Cell: Address of Subject Property (If available): State: City: ZIP: PROPERTY INFORMATION Section/Township/Range: _�_� Lot: Block: Subdivision: Metes &Bounds Description: Plat Book: Page #: Property I.D. Number: State: ZIP: Fax: TYPE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL TO BE PROVIDED Check applicable system: a. County Utility System b. City Utility System c. Franchised Utility System 6 Package Treatment Plant e. Septic System Check applicable system: Provide Name: (GPD Capacity): TYPE OF WATER SERVICE TO BE PROVIDED a. County Utility System ❑ b. City Utility System ❑ c. Franchised Utility System ❑ Provide Name: d. Private System (Well) ❑ Total Population to be Served: Peak and Average Daily Demands: A. Water -Peak: Average Daily: B. Sewer -Peak: Average Daily: If proposing to be connected to Collier County Regional Water System, please provide the date service is expected to be required: February 1, 2019 Page 6 of 11 Co er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergovmet 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Narrative statement: Provide a brief and concise narrative statement and schematic drawing of sewage treatment process to be used as well as a specific statement regarding the method of affluent and sludge disposal. If percolation ponds are to be used, then percolation data and soil involved shall be provided from tests prepared and certified by a professional engineer. Collier County Utility Dedication Statement: If the project is located within the service boundaries of Collier County's utility service system, a notarized statement shall be provided agreeing to dedicate the water distribution and sewage collection facilities within the project area to the Collier County Utilities. This shall occur upon completion of the construction of these facilities in accordance with all applicable County ordinances in effect at that time. This statement shall also include an agreement that the applicable system development charges and connection fees will be paid to the County Utilities Division prior to the issuance of building permits by the County. If applicable, the statement shall contain an agreement to dedicate the appropriate utility easements for serving the water and sewer systems. Statement of Availability Capacity from other Providers: Unless waived or otherwise provided for at the pre -application meeting, if the project is to receive sewer or potable water services from any provider other than the County, a statement from that provider indicating adequate capacity to serve the project shall be provided. February 1, 2019 Page 7 of 11 r; CoLLe County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE MAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252=6358 COVENANT OF UNIFIED CONTROL The undersigned do hereby swear or affirm that we are the fee simple titleholders and owners of record of property Commonly known as Shadowwood PUD Tract E, and Airpark North Parcel (Street address and City, State and Zip Code} and legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto. The property described herein is the subject of an application for amending the planned unit development ( Shadowwood PUD) zoning. We hereby designate Clyde Quinby legal representative thereof, as the legal representatives of the property and as such, these individuals are authorized to legally bind all owners of the property in the course of seeking the necessary approvals to develop, This authority includes, but is not limited to, the hiring and authorization of agents to assist in the preparation of applications, plans, surveys, and studies necessary to obtain zoning approval on the site. These representatives will remain the only entity to authorize development activity on the property until such time as a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to Collier County. 1 2 �3 n The undersigned recognize the following and will be guided accordingly in the pursuit of development of the project: The property will be developed and used in conformity with the approved master plan including all conditions placed on the development and all commitments agreed to by the applicant in connection with the planned unit development rezoning. The legal representative identified herein is responsible for compliance with all terms, conditions, safeguards, and stipulations made at the time of approval of the master plan, even if the property is subsequently sold in whole or in part, unless and until a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to and recorded by Collier County. A departure from the provisions of the approved plans or a failure to comply with any requirements, conditions, or safeguards provided for in the planned unit development process will constitute a violation of the Land Development Code. All terms and conditions of the planned unit development approval will be incorporated into covenants and restrictions which run with the land so as to provide notice to subsequent owners that all development activity within the planned unit development must be consistent with those terms and conditions. So long as this covenant is in force, Collier County can, upon the discovery of noncompliance with the terms, safeguards, and conditions of the planned unit development, seek equitable relief as necessary to compel compliance, The County will not issue permits, certificates, or licenses to occupy or use any part of the planned unit development and the County may stop ongoing construction activity until the project is brought into compliance with all terms, conditions and safeguards of the planned unit development. ©wryer John V.' CnKkay, Jr., VP of S.D. Cot):cn,lion of N1ptres. Inc. Printed Name Owner Printed Name STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF COLLIER) Sworn to (or affirmed) and subscribed before me this day of - 201 `I byi who is personally known to me or has produced -- as identification February 1, 2019 Notaey Public (Name typed, printed or stamped) rep CUM1.115SI�N0�1202 fit' !3 HO"�� Tf^' n.2f� ?UCIiC Urrr.-�ez y Page 8 of 11 Co er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: PUD Rezone= Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code Amendment to PUD- Ch. 3 G. 2 of the Administrative Code ❑ PUD to PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE MAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 The following Submittal Requirement checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting and at time of application submittal. At final submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with an up-to-date application. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. A Model PUD Document is available online at http://www.colliercountyfl.gov/Home/ShowDocument?id=76983. REQUIREMENTS COPIES REQUIRED REQUIRED Cover Letter with Narrative Statement including a detailed description of why amendment is necessary ❑ ❑ ❑ Completed Application with required attachments (download latest version) 1 ,� Pre -application meeting notes 1 ❑ Li Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized 1 Property Ownership Disclosure Form 1 1 ,^ Notarized and completed Covenant of Unified Control Completed Addressing Checklist 1 Warranty Deed(s) 1 ✓❑ ❑ List Identifying Owner and all parties of corporation 1 ✓ ❑ Signed and sealed Boundary Survey 1 ✓ Architectural Rendering of proposed structures 1 ✓ Current Aerial Photographs (available from Property Appraiser) with project boundary and, if vegetated, FLUCFCS Codes with legend included on aerial. 1 ❑ ✓❑ Statement of Utility Provisions 1Li✓ Environmental Data Requirements pursuant to LDC section 3.08.00 1 Q Environmental Data Requirements collated into a single Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) packet at time of public hearings. Coordinate with project planner at time of public hearings. ❑ ❑ 0 Listed or Protected Species survey, less than 12 months old. Include copies of previous surveys. Traffic Impact Study 1 1 ❑ a ❑ Historical Survey 1 ❑ Vol School Impact Analysis Application, if applicable 1 ✓❑ Electronic copy of all required documents 1 ✓ Completed Exhibits A-F (see below for additional information)' ❑ ❑ List of requested deviations from the LDC with justification for each (this document is separate from Exhibit E) ❑ ❑ Checklist continues on next page February 1, 2019 Page 9 of 11 Co r County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Revised Conceptual Master Site Plan IN x 36"and One 8 /a" x 11 copy_ ❑ 0 LMI Original PUD document/ordinance, and Master Plan 24" x 36" — Only if Amending the PUD ❑ ✓❑ ❑ Revised PUD document with changes crossed thru & underlined 1 ✓ ❑ Copy of Official Interpretation and/or Zoning Verification 1 ❑ ✓ *If located in Immokalee or seeking affordable housing, include an additional set of each submittal requirement +The following exhibits are to be completed on a separate document and attached to the application packet. ❑ Exhibit A: List of Permitted Uses ❑ Exhibit Be. Development Standards ❑ Exhibit C: Master Plan= See Chapter 3 E. 1. of the Administrative Code ❑ Exhibit D: Legal Description ❑ Exhibit E. List of Requested LDC Deviations and justification for each Exhibit F: List of Development Commitments If located in RFMU (Rural Fringe Mixed Use) Receiving Land Areas Pursuant to LDC subsection 2.03.08.A.2.a.2.(b.)i.c., the applicant must contact the Florida Forest Service at 239- 690-3500 for information regarding "Wildfire Mitigation & Prevention Plan." PLANNERS —INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: LJ School District (Residential Components): Arny ❑ Conservancy SWFL: Nichole Johnson of LockhCali- ❑ Utilities Engineering: Eric Fey ❑ Parks and Recreation: Barry Williams & David Berra [] Emergency Management: Dan Summers ❑ Immokalee Water/Sewer District: City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director ❑ Other: ❑ ASSOCIATED FEES FOR APPLICATION ❑ Pre -Application Meeting: $500.00 ❑ PUD Rezone: $10,nor) .00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre ❑ PUD to PUD Rezone: $8,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre ❑ PUD Amendment: $6,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre ❑ Comprehensive Planning Consistency Review: $2,250.00 ❑ Environmental Data Requirements -EIS Packet (submittal determined at pre -application meeting): $2,500.00 ❑ Listed or Protected Species Review (when an EIS is not required): $1,000.00 ❑ Transportation Review Fees: ® Methodology Review: $500.00 *Additional fees to be determined at Methodology Meeting. Q Minor Study Review: $750.00 Q Major Study Review $1,500.00 February 1, 2019 Page 10 of 11 Co ker County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.collierRov.net � Legal Advertising Fees: o CCPC: $1,125.00 o BCC: $500.00 School Concurrency Fee, if applicable: 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 o Mitigation Fees, if application, to be determined by the School District in coordination with the County Fire Code Plans Review Fees are not Listed, but are collected at the time of application submission and those fees are set forth by the Authority having jurisdiction. The Land Development Code requires Neighborhood Notification mailers for Applications headed to hearing, and this fee is collected prior to hearing. All checks payable to: Board of County Commissioners. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. *Additional fee for the Sth and subsequent re -submittal will be accessed at 20% of the original fee. Signature of Petitbner or Ag�gl Clyde Quinby, Agent Printed named of signing party r 2 �/6 Date February 1, 2019 Page 11 of 11 r County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliereov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NA )LES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 Pre -Application Meeting Notes Petition Type: PDI Date and Time: Monday 2 / 11 / 19 9 : 0 OAM Assigned Planner: Tim Finn Engineering Manager (for PPL's and FP's): Project Information Project Name: Shadow Wood PDI (PDI ) pL#: 20190000259 Property ID #: 00425960000 Current Zoning: PUD Project Address: 413 0 Skyway D r City: Naples State: F L Zip: 3 4112 Applicant: Chris Hagan, PE Agent Name: Clyde Quinby Phone: 1250 Tamiami Trail N.STE 203B Agent/Firm Address: Hagan Engineering City: NaPles State: FL Zip: 34102 Property Owner: SD Corporation of Naples, Inc. Please provide the following, if applicable: i. Total Acreage: ii. Proposed # of Residential Units: iii. Proposed Commercial Square Footage: iv. For Amendments, indicate the original petition number: v. If there is an Ordinance or Resolution associated with this project, please indicate the type and number: vi. If the project is within a Plat, provide the name and Updated 12/03/2018 Page � 1 of 5 40 Co er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliereov.net Meeting Notes As of 10/16/2017 all Zoning applications have revised al 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NA ILES, FLORIDA 34104 (23 )) 252-2400 ications, and your associated Ohip Disclosure Application is included in your notes; additionally a *new Property wners SEENER Form is required for all applications. A copy of this new form is included in your pre-app Note — link is https://www.colliereov,net/Home/ShowDocument?id=75093. +i c h n 0 cc :� Cl ► t') C V; I h i,� i c % 1- r� r� ni (ems c' �Ic- Disclaimer: Information provided by staff to applicant during the Pre -Application Meeting is based on the best available data at the time of the meeting and may not fully inform the applicant of issues that could arise during the process. The Administrative Code and LDC dictates the regulations which all applications must satisfy. Any checklists provided of required data for an application may not fully outline what is needed. It is the applicant's responsibility to provide all required data. Updated 12/03/2018 Page � 2 of 5 i COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT wwwxolliemov.net County Meeting Notes AT 31'7my -- �,,(� k� ( i I J L.) �� 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252=2400 Other required documentation for submittal (not listed on application): sew ch e isclaimer.• Information provided by staff to applicant during the Pre -Application Meeting is based on the best available data at the time of the meeting and may not fully inform the applicant of issues that could arise during the process. The Administrative Code and LDC dictates the regulations which all applications must satisfy. Any checklists provided of required data for an application may not fully outline what is needed. It is the applicant's responsibility to provide all required data. Updated 12/03/2018 Page (3 of 5 Collier County Transportation Planning and PUD Monitoring Pre-App Notes Developer Commitments: Tranti��or-tation Planning _ �� c �� " The maximum total daily trip generation for the PUD shall not exceed two-way PM peak hour net trips based on the use codes in the ITE Manual on trip generation rates in effect at the time of application for SDP/SDPA or subdivision plat approval." Use Codes Provide both ITE and SIC use codes in the TIS. PL_ T� nnitnring 5 .� `-`One entity (hereinafter the Managing Entity) shall be responsible for PUD monitoring until close- out of the PUD, and this entity shall also be responsible, for satisfying all PUD commitments until close-out of the PUD. At the time of this CPUD approval, the Managing Entity is the Insert Company Name Here. Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity, then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document that needs to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. After such approval, the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts, the Managing Entity shall provide written notice to County that includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required by the CPUD by the new owner and the new owner's agreement to comply with the Commitments through the Managing Entity, but the Managing Entity shall not be relieved of its responsibility under this Section. When the PUD is closed -out, then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring and f ilf llnaent of PUD commitments." � Miscellaneous 5 .� "Pursuant to Section 125.022(5) F.S., issuance of a development permit by a county does not in any way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law. All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before commencement of the development." �r Collier Count y COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.collier�ov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239} 252-2400 Pre -Application Meeting Sign -In Sheet PL# 20190000259 Collier County Contact Information: Name � Review Discipline Phone Email � David Anthony Environmental Review 252-2497 david.anthony@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Summer Araque Environmental Review 252-6290 summer.brownaraque@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Claudine Auclair GMD Operations and ! Regulatory Management 252-5887 Claudine.auclair@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Steve Baluch Transportation Planning 252-2361 Stephen.baluch@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Ray Bellows Zoning, Planning Manager 252-2463 raymond.bellows@colliercountyfl.gov Laurie Beard PUD Monitoring 252-5782 laurie.beard@colliercountyfl.gov '_. Craig Brown Environmental Specialist 252-2548 craig.brown@colliercountyfl.gov Heidi Ashton Cicko Managing Asst. County Attorney 252-8773 heidi.ashton@colliercountvfl.gov Thomas Clarke Operations Coordinator 252-2584 thomas.Clarke@colliercountyfl.gov 7 Eric Fey, P.E. Utility Planning 252-1037 eric.fey@colliercountyfl.gov Tim Finn, AICP Zoning Division 252-4312 timothy.finn@colliercountyfl.gov _Sue Faulkner Comprehensive Planning 252-5715 sue.faulkner@colliercountyfl.gov _ Paula Fleishman Impact Fee Administration 252-2924 paula.fleishman@colliercountyfl.gov � 1 James French Growth Management Deputy Department Head 252-5727 fames.french@colliercountyff.gov � Michael Gibbons Structural/Residential Plan Review 252-2426 michael.gibbons@colliercountyfl.gov Storm Gewirtz, P.E. Engineering Stormwater 252-2434 storm.gewirtz@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Nancy Gundlaeh, AICP, PLA Zoning Division 252-2484 nancy.gundlach@colliercountyfl.goy ❑ Shar Hingson I Greater Naples Fire District 774-2800 shingson@gnfire.org John Houldsworth Engineering Subdivision 252-5757 John.houldsworth@colliercountyfl.gov �� Jodi Hughes _ Transportation Pathways 252-5744 Jodi.hughesCa�colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Alicia Humphries Right -Of -Way Permitting 252-2326 alicia.humphries@a colliercountvfLgov ❑ Erin Josephitis Environmental Specialist, Senior 252-2915 erin.�osephitis@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Marcia Kendall Comprehensive Planning 252-2387 marcia.kendall@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ John Kelly Zoning Senior Planner 252-5719 john.kelly@colliercountvfl.gov (� Gil Martinez Zoning Principal Planner 252-4211 gilbert.martinez@colliercountyfl.gov Thomas Mastroberto Greater Naples Fire 252-7348 thomas.mastroberto@colliercountyfl.gov �_ Jack McKenna, P.E. Engineering Services 252-2911 'ack.mckenna@colliercountyfl.gov l__: Matt McLean, P.E. Development Review Director 252-$279 matthew.mclean@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Michele Mosca, AICP Capital Project Planning 252-2466 michele.mosca@colliercountyfl.gov Updated 12/03/2018 Page � 4 of 5 County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 Annis Moxam Addressing 252-5519 annis.moxam@colliercountvfl.gov 252-2313 u Stefanie Nawrocki Development Review - Zoning stefanie.nawrocki@colliercountvfl.eov J Richard Orth Stormwater Planning 252-5092 rich ard.orth@colliercountyfLgov V Brandy Otero Transit =252�5859 brandy.otero@colliercountyfl.gov 1 Brandi Pollard Utility Impact fees 252-6237 brandi.pollard@colliercountvfl.eov Todd Riggall North Collier Fire 597-9227 triggall@northcollierfire.com Y Daniel Roman, P.E. Engineering Utilities 252-2538 daniel.roman@colliercountvfl.gov Development Review J Brett Rosenblum, P.E. Principal Proiect Manager 252-2905 brett.rosenblum@colliercountvfl.gov J James Sabo, AICP Zoning Principal Planner 252-2708 james.sabo@colliergo.net Michael Sawver Transportation Planning 252-2926 michael.sawyer@coiliercountvfl.gov Corby Schmidt, AICP Comprehensive Planning 252-2944 corby.schmidt@colliercountvfl.eov 771 Chris Scott, AICP Development Review - Zoning 252-2460 chris.scott@coiliercountvfl.gov U Linda Simmons North Collier Fire 252-2311 Linda.Simmons@colliercountvfl.gov Peter Shawinskv Architectural Review 252-8523 peter.shawinsky@colliercountvfl.gov Camden Smith Zoning Operations Manager 252-1042 camden.smith@colliercountvfl.gov Scott Stone Assistant Countv Attornev 252-5740 scott.stone@colliercountvfl.gov u Mark Strain Hearing Examiner/CCPC 2524446 mark.strain@colliercountvfl.gov Mark Templeton Landscape Review 252-2475 mark.templeton@colliercountvfl.gov Jessica Velasco Zoning Division Operations 252-2584 Jessica.velasco@colliercountvfl.gov iJ Jon Walsh, P.E. Building Review 252-2962 jonathan.walsh@coiliercountvfl.eov Comprehensive Planning i J David Weeks, AICP Future Land Use Consistency 252-2306 david.weeks0colliercountvfl.gov Kirsten Wilkie Environmental Review Manager 252-5518 kirsten.wilkie@colliercountvfl.eov ! l Christine Willoughby Development Review - Zoning 252-5748 christine.willoughbv@colliercountvfl.eov u Daniel Zunzunegui North Collier Fire 252-2310 Dan iel.Zunzunegui@colliercountvfl.eov Additional Attendee Contact Information: Name Representing Phone Email � 1 Ll r c: •'1 t t aj ' 4ppe,1" ,o) 7' 4 :K 9 - 721: o 77 G '' / Arm r 5 P f-� _ _ a. c a Updated 12/03/2018 Page � 5 of 5 PL20190000259 - �� Applicant/Agent may also send site plans or conceptuo! plans for review in advance if desired. Grr�wth Management Department Shadow Zoning Division ood PDI PDI PRE-APP INFORMATION Assigned fps Staff: Thomas Clarke Camden Smith,(Ops Staff) STAFF FORM FOR SUPPLEMENTAL PRE -APPLICATION MEETING INFORMATION • Name and Number of who submitted pre-app request Chris Hagan, PE 239-228-7742 chris@haganeng.com • Agent to list for PL# Clyde Quinby • Owner of property (all owners for all parcels} SD Corporation of Naples, Inc. • Confirm Purpose of Pre-App: (Rezone, etc.) Insubstantial PUD Amendment (PDI) • Please list the density request of the project if applicable and number of homes/units/offices/docks (any that aPPly}� The purpose of subject PDI Petition is to add directional arrows to the Shadow Wood PUD Master Plan associated with Tract E, to indicate connection to the public roadway network. • Details about Project (choose type that applies): PDI — At the time of the original PUD adoption in July,1982, spotty single-family development west of the PUD Lands was just beginning, with access being from unimproved roadways. See historic aerials. Access to the PUD was from Rattlesnake Hammock Road, and interconnectivity was not a requirement at that time. The original Shadow Wood PUD Master Plan did indicate potential right -of --way adjacent to Tract E where Whitaker Road and Polly Avenue would eventually exist, however, the clarity for such connections is not readily evident, and Zoning Director Bosi requested the PDI process as a remedial measure. REQUIRED Supplemental Information provided by: Name: Chris Hagan, PE Title: Owner Email: chris@haganeng.com Phone: 239-228-7742 Created April 5, 2017 SEE ��'�ch�.A: Location: K:\CDES Planning Services\Current\Zoning Staff Information Zoning Dnnsion • 2800 Nolth Horseshoe Drive •Naples, Florida 34104.23�252-2440 • www colNergo�v net _if _ � I - � 1 t f Z 'T7 �_ T Z i', �.n Z ".� ■i A a � S 0 7 w SHADOW WOOD PUD TRACT E LEGAL DESCRIPTION A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA DESCRIPTION OF PART OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA ALL THAT PART OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE EAST 1/2 OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 16; THENCE ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 16, NORTH 89°20'05" WEST 630.02 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL HEREIN DESCRIBED; THENCE SOUTH 00°14'25" EAST 170.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 27°35'38" EAST 456.94 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°14'25" EAST 110.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89'45'35" EAST 120.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 22°02'30" EAST 107.70 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF A RUNWAY AND TAXIWAY EASEMENT AS DESCRIBED IN O.R. 593 PAGE 301, COLLIER COUNTY PUBLIC RECORDS, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE ALONG SAID WEST LINE SOUTH 00°14'25" EAST 1263.56 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF WING SOUTH PRIVATE VILLAS UNIT'I" ACCORDING TO PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN CONDOMINIUM PLAT BOOK 4, PAGE 46, COLLIER COUNTY PUBLIC RECORDS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE THE FOLLOWING SIX (6} DESCRIBED COURSES: 1} SOUTH 89°45'35" WEST 193.02 FEET; 2) NORTH 62°51'11" WEST 141.69 FEET; 3) SOUTH 62°12'15" WEST 108.47 FEET; 4) SOUTH 89°45'35" WEST 500.00 FEET; 5) NORTH 00°14'25" WEST 16.52 FEET; 6) SOUTH 89°45'35" WEST 132.69 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE EAST 1/2 OF SAID SECTION 16; THENCE ALONG SAID WEST LINE NORTH 00°13'25" WEST 2028.59 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 16; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTH LINE SOUTH 89°20'05" EAST 677.23 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL HEREIN DESCRIBED; AND THE NORTHWEST ONE -QUARTER (1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST ONE -QUARTER (1/4) OF THE NORTHEAST ONE -QUARTER (1/4) OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH,. RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; LESS THE SOUTHERLY AND THE WESTERLY 30 FEET THEREOF FOR ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY PURPOSES: AND THE NORTHEAST ONE -QUARTER (1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST ONE -QUARTER (1/4) OF THE NORTHEAST ONE -QUARTER (1/4) OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; AND THE SOUTHEAST ONE -QUARTER (1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST ONE -QUARTER (1/4) OF THE NORTHEAST ONE -QUARTER (1/4) OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST; COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; AND ALL THAT PART OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 16, THENCE ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 16, NORTH 890-20'-05" WEST 260.02 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL HEREIN DESCRIBED: THENCE ALONG THE WEST LINE OF A RUNWAY AND TAXIWAY EASEMENTS AS DESCRIBED IN O.R. 593 PAGE 300, COLLIER COUNTY PUBLIC RECORDS, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA SOUTH 0°-14'-25" EAST 780.00 FEET, THENCE NORTH 220-02'-30" WEST 107.70 FEET, THENCE SOUTH 89045"-35" WEST 120.00 FEET, THENCE NORTH 000-14'-25" WEST 110.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 270-35'-38" WEST 456.94 FEET, THENCE NORTH 000-14`-25" WEST 170.00 FEET TO THE NORTH LfNE OF SAID SECTION 16, THENCE ALONG SAID NORTH LINE SOUTH 89°-20-05 EAST 370.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL HEREIN DESCRIBED, pL 20 1 ( 4L'c) "z.<cf, r✓,'1 L. 0rp,,r, i,T r0,� pot. Shadow Wood PDI pre-app agenda 2/11/2019: • Introductions • Project description Location maps PUD approved 1982, amended 2008 Tract E • Review access issues, Rattlesnake Hammock, Santa Barbara, Polly, Whitaker, Adkins • Review PDI exhibit submittal list (from WLB draft cover letter). �-- - _ _--�- •too r wooer a i .. .....a_�.min= MEMO. J }} lappoR All. not Op 41, so, + ;rj 0 1 K O O �>� b. s,- "�L" C •rriW-� _- __ _ _1! Eh1q�MCE ORW2-� (Shrr.Ar OWn.t) GtiCft�P i!OlY rilA� I i� 'RACE A +9Atai � 4 C - Y�LiI-,f�,lr RE90(hTW. +RACI R - S�nCIE-fAWf_r p[5[iEN1tK 'Ru'� C - PR�VAiE AIR PAkK orsTFhcr 1 RAC" 0 - tOYYERC1k F HTR,MY�t DRrvE TOMS GN"55 ^�CM u•+ .:4i :y: AfPitCFXIYAT[ •-N-te:r BYiiW214 livLly 11311 �>e e—}r S.%pt a-ti. irM— 14.!.Z N/A •ar+j Il�L` N/,► �.01 NSA �0a•t 56A 51.E �3D .��' Ut195/Ar;REf NOTE: THI f Xrllf311 WA5 RECREATE('i 1 F{Utif 1 HE ORIGINAL A(lOP f E D PI:U MASTER rCAN CA;{EFUI A11CN1IhN WAS F�AI�� T[I MINIMIZE r,vIVTENTIONnI F{_�ItiIONS t-It UNLY INICN�CO C�IANGES A�{F �•.hOwra IN STRIKE-1+�+k0UCH/UNhLRLINF F'"ORMAT IN T1-C SUMNARY TAf.JL� AND WITH 8T)UNOARY CiANC[S TC� TRnCT5 Ej do C. Q. GRADY 411N4R � ASSOCIATGS, P.A. ��'� y�3�r�p Aux -- OIL CrMN1Y�S.1N,0 M�2�M�r1urlW .uvNf.�M �K711iaf:R - •nt••n+w • .a �rrw r A1O1pI _ ..... ,� � �.. .., � .+.�...... _.. EYMIEi1T Ei � r� : r .nvrwa. �Lr 2 �� M I TRACT E VOOD PDI Y, FLORIDA TRACT C TRAC-T-[) IZ'7�s7 TRACT A \ ENTRANCE DRIVE (SKYWAY DRIVE) � tlaWNam r�ve_w11 ry�!wi r�Aru n• q nIN 41+II"J"rt ,h4I 11114ww INIIT' I ArY - , r.waT+.rwu • we f6a •1TI-0 i �144 roan I RAr 114- SPICUtfAMN 0 R[. IDEN tIAI I, Nh5, 11it) TAN:' I. P/A,rATN AIM PAJb 9109tt"I 'dA N AY ' J . /1 A 0 t:,N✓,l Nrl.'N ut.l, t•p,•.A c NT4: c'T° T•PR'' , is taA Ili^l riM• rW MN 1 •..lit I•I.& "IdjWT WAS••t "t4••l%ii"jow TIN Ir.n uyy Ap'.v'14 ^YAO"LI, ✓1/M rANf.I_y AT %TWN AA: ^Alto tijU oAV17C /1L,'C•. It3UM VC+CoA!.. '{ jIn.r INTCtI I. IIM/LCb AIQ :JIGr* IN i1MNtL-II UUVC.•,VI*LLNLua I .N MAI ,K :.l KMIA1(1 'A{IL-. ANO WA04MA• a:HAhCLw I.'J I1U1G hfY ► l j CA4:T,RM ACCE09 VA1010riftO ACCoM — cA,enna inC,gFp 4Imw Evv r n olfjt 1 ©I�AGAN PREPARED FOR_ I PROPOSED PUD MASTER PLAN F N1i111FFNI\G +aotwlAr� ew+lntrr*N,rTt;a:u SD C`JRPORATION OF NAPLES, INC. -------T— NNMI" row" IM110i nlry II'�!14VI lo; %CAL1, as lrzmsw� coo ------- A•Ivr l7lel •••a7lY -- ----------- -- _._ .-- - _T��L ---- PUG r,�Iv.ip M• M\ qI+UU ;I.r. � 3 I n w.l INGR![[I EGREii IT'YhCALI �YHI'ok9LP RGAN t4Yrs furl hDkIN! hPE C V[RC7'f lT ns-•, FL'L' ahTT.l Pyp M�1R FIRIT�Cr l E%IBTING MORE95 / EG(iEGG fTYPICAU EMI[TINO AGCI[[ H PNDPglED ACC[[[ COI. I.f� A'Alh fhl>.(DROADWA'11 } C+Ihm I I SHADOW WOOD PDI H AGAN NEIGHBORHOOD EXHIBIT © F. U IN h F.P.I % PREPARED FOR' COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA eoT �wrP. y mar. vLaar I wl� l rc�r � ng+�.u. SD CORPORATION OF NAPLES INC Co er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Pre -Application Meeting and Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: PUD Insubstantial Change Chapter 3 G.3 of the Administrative Code The following Submittal Requirement checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting and at time of application submittal. At final submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with the application packet. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. REQUIREMENTS FOR REVIEW COPIES REQUIRED REQUIRED Completed Application (download current form from County website) 1 ❑ Pre -Application Meeting notes 1 ❑ Project Narrative, including a detailed description of proposed changes and why amendment is necessary 1 ❑ Detail of request 1 Current Master Plan & 1 Reduced Copy 1 z Revised Master Plan & 1 Reduced Copy 1 Revised Text and any exhibits PUD document with changes crossed through & underlined L H PUD document as revised with amended Title Page with Ordinance # ❑t Warranty Deed Legal Description 1 X Boundary survey, if boundary of original PUD is amended If PUD is platted, include plat book pages ❑ List identifying Owner & all parties of corporation 1 Affidavit of Authorization, signed & notarized 1 Completed Addressing Checklist 1 Propertv Ownership Disclosure Form 1 Copy of 8 Yz in. x 11 in. graphic location map of site 1 ❑ Electronic copy of all documents and plans *Please advise: The Office of the Hearing Examiner requires all materials to be submitted electronically in PDF format. �] e ❑ *If located in Immokalee or seeking affordable housing, include an additional set of each submittal requirement. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS: • Following the completion of the review process by County Review staff, the applicant shall submit all materials electronically to the designated project manager. • Please contact the project manager to confirm the number of additional copies required. Revised 3/27/2018 Page 3 of 4 Collier County 000 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliereov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NA 'LES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 PLANNERS —INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: School District (Residential Components): Amy � I nrkhaart L Utilities Engineering: Eric Fey I n ey Emergency Management: Dan Summers Conservancy of SWFL: Nichole Johnson City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment: Ex Ber cutive Director Parks and Recreation. Barry Williams and David ra Naples Airport Authority: Other: Other: FEE REQUIREMENTS PUD Amendment Insubstantial (PDI): $1,500.00 ,N' Pre -Application Meeting: $500.00 ,k Estimated Legal Advertising fee for the Office of the Hearing Examiner: $1,125.00 Same fee applies if the petition is referred to the Collier County Planning Commission, where the CCPC serves as the deciding authority instead of the HEX. Fire Code Plans Review Fees are collected at the Time of application submission and those fees are set foI th by the Authority having jurisdiction. The Land Development Code requires Neighborhood Notification mailers for Applications headed to hearing, and this fee is collected prior to hearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. All checks payable to: Board of County Commissioners. The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Department Planning and Regulation ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Agent/Owner Signature Applicant/Owner Name (please print) Revised 3/27/2018 Date Page 4 of 4 AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) P120t90000259, Shadow Wood P01 I John Casket' applicable) of so corporation of tyeyles1 Inc. under oath, that I am the (choose one) own (print name), aSyke Presldont (title, if (company, If a licable), swear or affirm :t purchaserF9and that: 1. I have full authority to secure the approvals) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code, 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. I have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5. Well authorize Clyde C. Oulney to act as ourlmy representative in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. *Notes: • it the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the corp. pres, or v. pres. • if the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.L.C.) or Limited Company (L.C.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member. • if the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. • If the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the "general partner" of the named partnership. • If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee". • In each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership, Under pen"{ties of perjury I declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that the facts stated in it are true. STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing instrument was sworn to (or affirmed) and subscribed before me on � - � -- 1 q (date} by ao�ti ,�� 1( (name of person providing oath or affirmation), as V , QSIN CQ AcPLoA S who is personally known to me or who has produced (type of identification) as identification. z::)4 STAMPISEAL Signature of Notary Public R08ERT M. BtlCttML ' MY COMM{SSSON � OG �7'45T ,; EXPlRE3: March 1, Z022 j CP108-COA-0011511 SS REV 3l24/14 CORPORATE AFFIDAVIT STATE OF Florida COUNTY OF Collier BEFORE ME, the undersigned officer authorized to administer oaths, on this day personally appeared John W. Caskey, Jr. , as Director and Vice President of S.D. Corporation of Navies, Inc. a Florida corporation (the "Corporation"), General Partner with the Property Owner, and Manager for the Property Owner, who upon being duly sworn, deposes and says; 1. The undersigned is over the age of 18 years, understands the obligations of an oath, and has personal knowledge of the facts stated herein the PUD Amendment Application (PL201900000259). 2. The undersigned is a Director & Vice President of the Corporation. 3. The Corporation was formed under the laws of the State of Florida, is currently in good standing and has not been dissolved. FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NAUGHT Jo . �'askey, Jr. Di 'ect rand Vice ['resident � -- _ S.D. orporation of Naples, Inc. a Florida corporation The foregoing instrument was sworn to, subscribed and acknowledged before me this � �� day of June, 2019,(year) by John W. Caskey, Jr., Director and Vice President of S.D. Corporation of Naples, Inc., a Florida corporation, who is personally known to me or has produced as identification. - - [Notary Seal] 4814-6361-4106, v. 2 Yuhlic Notary Printed Name: My Commission Expires. '"--- OUNN ,1� I ", ftENG� . MY CUMMIS� ICN � GG 021302 �,i ,� EXPI�2E5: A6csmber 15.2020 `:'� �:�• Bores iT.iu Notary PIJW Unserv+nlers ACTION IN LIEU OF SPECIAL MEETING OF THE DIRECTORS OF S.D. CORPORATION OF NAPLES9 INC. GENERAL PARTNER OF WING SOUTH DEVELOPMENT LIMITED The undersigned, being all of the members of the Board of Directors of S.D. Corporation of Naples, Inc., (a Florida corporation (the "Corporation"}, in lieu of action taken at a meeting and pursuant to Chapter 607.0821 of the Florida Business Corporation Act and the Bylaws of the Corporation, hereby authorize, approve and adopt the following by written consent; WHEREAS, the corporation was filed with the Secretary of State of Florida on October 18, 1996; Buckel and John W. Caskey,(also known as Sohn Caskey); and WHEREAS, the Board confirms that Robert M. Buckel is President and John Caskey is Vice President; and WHEREAS, S.D. Corporation of Naples, Inc. is the general partner of Wing South Development Limited, a Florida limited partnership; and WHEREAS, Wing South Development Limited is filing an "Insubstantial PUD Amendment (PDI)" Application and Property Ownership Disclosure Form and related documents with Collier County Government; and on behalf of the Corporation as General Partner of Wing South Development Limited to sign any required documentation as it relates to the Collier County PDI, to and including the PDI Application and Property Ownership Disclosure Form; MIT, i Directors of the Corporation, do hereby consent that John Caskey as Vice President has full authority on behalf of the Corporation and Wing South Development Limited to sign any required documentation as it relates to the Collier County PDI, to and including the PDI Application and Property Ownership Disclosure Form. PL20190000259 Shadowwood PDI The undersigned , being all of the members of the Board of Directors have executed this Action in Lieu of Special Meeting to be effective as of the 3 day of April 2019, and may be signed in counterparts, each of which when together shall constitute a single document. 4827-4881-5762, v. 1 ) Robert M. Buckel Director PL20190000259 Shadowwood PDI Wing South Limited Partners Ownership Interest Name Address Percentage Interest Janice W. Wardell 12 Equestrian Way Cartersville, GA 30121 0.6941 Marvin Polly P.O. Box 106 North Vernon, IN 47265 0.9102 Donald Polly 980 Diana Avenue Naples, FL 34103 0.9102 Estate of Dorothy McKelvey Valerie Wells, Independent Executor 1.0412 #210 W. Powhatan Avenue Tampa, FL 33604 Fred Alander Trust Jane Hergott, Trustee Fred Alander Trust U/A/D 1.1737 11 /27/01 917 Roseate Drive Naples, FL 34104 Carolyn Thompson PO Box 247 Everglades City, FL 34139 1.9426 or 209 North Collier Avenue Everglades City, FL 34139 Patrick Geraghty P. O. Box 1605 Fort Myers, FL 33902-1605 2.0915 and 1320 Alcazar Avenue Fort Myers, FL 33901 Tim Daniels P.O. Box 2520 LaBelle, FL 33975 2.4282 William Marten 3880 Skyway Drive Naples, FL 34112 3.2086 R. Buckel and D. Buckel 325 Second Avenue, South Naples, FL 34102 3.7749 Naples Insurance 848 First Avenue, No. Suite 210 8.6788 Naples, FL 34102 PL20190000259 Shadowwood PDI Wing South Limited Partners Ownership Interest Cont. Memorial Trust Brian E. Jones, Trustee Memorial Trust of 2016 1002721 2121 Heritage Trail Naples, FL 34112 J. Caskey and L. Caskey 364 Edgemere Way North Naples, FL 34105 2288739 Robert Buckel Trust Robert M. Buckel, Trustee Buckel Family Trust U/A/D 40 10/ 1 /98 325 Second Avenue, South Naples, FL 34102 PL20190000259 Shadowwood PDI RECEIVER'S FEE SUViPLE DEED I WS IN1)1:N'I'Ukl: made this da%m eat' r , A.U., 1996, by WALLa r% JONES. ltcce•lvcr kir Wind! South Development, Ltd.. a dissolved Florida Limited Purtncrship, par- suant to an Order of'the ('ircuit Court in and tier Collier ('ounty, Florida, under Case No. 88-3123- W � 'A-O 1. hereinafter called the (irantor, to S.D. CORPORATION OF NAPLES, INC., as General %0 _ Partner of V1- ing tiuuth De�'e.•lupntent9 l.td., a t:lurida limited Partnership, «husc punt once address is �SU 1 "l'wtii�u»i �l'raii North, Suite.• �UU, Naples, C'ollie.•r ('aunty, 1� lurida �a 103, hcreinattcr called the iiru�tee { «he•rever used herein tht• terms "C;rantor" :Ind "Grantee" include all the parties to this instrument and the h�•irs, Irgal assigns of corporations) purl entered un Uctuber l �i, l yyy! by, Count}. 1� lorida, under Cas Nu WITNESSETEI: '1'h• t i valuable consideration, receip aliens, rc.•miu:s, releases and I'lOrlda. tU-N'1t: �� •�n •i� ti of individuals, and the successors and )rder to Termin V iP vershi and Form Partnership. • n s, in t Ci •uit Court in and for Collier U: Ifitur, an z nsi iq �` the sum of S 10.00 and other is hereby ark c ��i3/fierebygrants, bargains, sells, land situate in Collier County, E C� 1. 'Tract E: and thN Airpark Furth 'Tract of they ShadowWuod Planning l knit 1)evclupmc•nt, as more partictilarl} described in EX1ilB1TS A and B attached hereto, and incorporated herein by reference. ?. Sewage Treatment Facility parcel, as more particularly described in lI X1 II I;11' C, uttttnc�d hereto, and incorporated herein by reference:, subject to the March 29, 1990, l*ee Simple Deed to WINO; SOU'rli/sIIADOWWOOD SEWAUI. TREATMENT ASSOCIA- TION, INC., a Florida Corporation not -for -profit, as recorded in U.R. Btx)k 1517, Pages 988 through 990 inclusive, of the Public Records of Collier County. Florida. "I'()(;1:"1'1Il::R with all the tenements, hereditalnents and appurtenances thereto belonging ur in any �4ise.• appertaining. i oa 'tI IIAVf: AND TO 1101.D, the same in ice simple forever. IN WITNE.SS WHER1:01�, the said Granter has hereunto set his hands and scat the day and year first atxw� writtrn0 Signed, s�alc:d and delivered in the presence of these witnesses. Printed Name of Witness Signature of Witness Printed Name ut' Witness ro Signature of Witness WII.L.IAM JONCS, Court Appointed Receiver for Wing South Development, Ltd., a dissolved Florida Limited PartnershiQ WILLIAM JONES S'I'ATL' U1� 1� I.URlDA COUNTY 016 1 C701a141ER C� I }HEREBY CERTII• t on this day, before County aforesaid to take ack gments, personal Wing South Development, Lt . d lved Florida Li to be the Receiver for Wing Sou 0 e As who executed the foregoing on behal under oath, that he executed the same on be his authority as Court Appointed Receiver for Limited Partnership. h my authorized in the State and LLIAM JONES, Receiver for to me personally known �t, I.td � �d Florida Lii mted Partnership, and ti Ps attd which before me acknowledged, in the name of the Receivership, pursuant to Wing South Development, Ltd., a dissolved Florida WITNESS my hand and official seal in thc('aunty and State fast aforesaid this � l _day Notavy Nblic State of Florida at Large My Commission Expires: ��.�►s�1�: ' � �'`''''�' "�' �' My Commission #: COWM: ago • a• '�+ vv v&0 OR: 2282 PG; 1905 Gt 1 1 l5 - OOtIIC WILSON, MILLER, BARYON, SOLL i PEEK, INC. Q as- MdESLWNK JW51MCPS rLMUG; M40 LJ" UAV(YWS Z% CMEXHIBIT "A" °D con cn i roscriptlon of pact of Section 161 Township 30 South. • Range 36 .Cast, Collier County, Florida to 0o uJ Tract `C• ' .0 Q (The Rookery Ltd,) ca O _ o All that part of the east 1/3 0( the east 1/2 of Section 14. Township SO south. Range 36 Cast. Cclliec County. florid& and being ' mace particularly described as follows• Coatisenc►ng at the northeast corner of said section 101 • thence along the north line of said =eetlon li, north 89•-30'-05* West 130.02 feet to the UM-o •CG1Mi1ING of the parcel hocein p described, 1; [� [�' O 1 tbonce ia.uth/0•�1�'iayS' ZaQ(�q- 0 Leee� thence soukR� 7, �iY -� nt LSiv:lti costs thence sOgt4 b 1t'-3S• Cast fi a �'a"ets Q --� m thence NoRSh �!•-�S'-3S' Cast 12 ��fs�ts ; M' N •� %hens•/Nu�li 2 ••030=30' see% 1970 %sea to the west 1 ne of a runway ang t�s�iw�ay�a"•w__e_nt doss bed \in O. Sla. Page 3018 O p Coll er C.oun�Cie j, P, Iic Raeo?d:, Co111 County. riocidas :hen o a oag said' "Zi: no i th 0"-k1•-Ole Cast 1263.56 teat to he rCp►�t'� rl o ocr veto villas Unit `I" acc rdt o A t tls% c o rh o 'd n c ndoainluw• Plat ■oak 10 80e146 Co 11 c n yt til ca ds, Collier County; Pio i,da the ��ai a d Pin ttl to T'b tnq six (i) des. titled eouesess 1 I ` 4th s!'-/!•-350 Was 930 3 rid j 2) 119t h s2•-Sl•-11' Wes r 3) Sdia \ 62•-12'-154 Wert' 4) !•-IS'-35• Kast SO� (tie 1 S) M t -1/' M2S'•West 1i.S7, asz'I i) 3ou .*� 3S Wes"I t_+et to* the vest lino of • 161 the • t }�/fft\l70o 12�`23SeWest n202s.S! teat thence alonq �a1dt wit (lt�iV A to the q rth liai 0t-saTd ction 13s thence along said north line South 690-20'-05' Last 677.23 teat to the Point ot•seginning of the paccal herein describedl 1 MC the northuest one -quarter (�) of the northwest one -quarter •(1/4) of the northeast one-qusrtac (1/4) of Section 16. Township SO South# Range 26 cast, Collier County. Flocidas • LESS the southerly and the w•stacly 30 toot thereat for road r rgwt-ot-way purposeas ' • v AND _ . _ the northeast one -quarter (V) of the northwest one -quarter • (1/41 of the northeast one••quacter (1/4) of section li. • Township 30 South$ Woo 23 Last, Collier County. Plcridal �, • , AND • 40 the southeast one -quarter (TTi) at the northwest one-quartsc • :l t ..� (1/4) of the northeast ono -quarter (1/41 of Section if , ' • Township SO south$ Range 36 Last, Collier County, cloridas casement04 s • subject to and restrictions of record. • ;MiLsu11. HILLER. CARTON, sOLL a PLLK, INC. • pego uginsece and Land 1ucvey0cs � ;.ATc If 117/f S� M1, .l..S. 127i ' W.O. 21�57 Rets IC-26S (11LCskjd tract-e) Date: 11-2"5 �..�• Yw.Warai/��I..%M%UW.%M a/rt.a •&••er.•tt•.N•4%0/.•C.11 .rrwN.►t.•r(lu•tr►.LL.tWtMa•t+iMtLt.L G �, M...M.�I ti.wit. w�.�ii. t.Y.. •t►L��.. ,•...a d6W•.0{,. Nam" t.g4.i . �•aV %Mft.ftt0�ti...04VMF"441&Ai1 i ' f�tr:. �..Hl :,�� . c , LL 110 .. .� . C ORO 94 Zia; 1?Q6 AW P Oleo 00 G!•ill� 002i17 oa 300K • •• PAGL , , r WtISON. MlttEn. 8A•1i .ff. SOIL !r tE;K• 1f1C• "+ c•- fACdtSS�ON� (NGln;itS• •`t.••H•.i:S %tj3 Woo :jsm.1rC1S EXHIBIT "B'� Description at part of secc;on li, Tovashi p SO South. RanQs 26 Cast, Collier County, rumvids. AI rpack north (The Ruotiwry Lta•1 MIND 0 All that part at Section 160 Township So Uo4:h, i:anQe 2i Vast. Collier Countyp Placid& and b�tnQ more pacticulscly dsserthed 46 • toliovsf • CO"enainq at the northeast corner of said Sectic•ll iif thence 410np the north line of said Seatton 16, North eq•-20•-0S" Wont 260.02 feet to I r4111Nif1O at tLe pascal herein 406cribe4f T thence ale ! b� n��tYX •n: tasivaY oaaeoent as describ 393, PaOe :ler County tublie Records, Collis r a , Placid& Routh • 2S• Latt 790.00 teeti thence Mo 22•-029-304 West 10 70 04%; thenc or t - •- ' 1=0. 0 9 *to then a 11 rt go e t :10,0 he o to rthto to thco • - ea tc the north line of ssi to ti n f the Ce to 0 a i n r u t1 i •• '00S• Cast 370.0d toot to 1 t 11. of 4: ac •iV hati•tn desccibedf subject s is re tiu ! rd. WIL30110• M , BARTON, BOLL t a•00 9 �n9in Lan urveyo CQ / • ' w.o. • =t�s7 �� CIRC ,•i�ait� i�. tc-its (VLCok • Oatei•j ' 11-22-iS • f • • • t. . 6 r - +%1'• i ' • . •.' .406 bp • eaYasi ', • e0ex EA IBIT A NID—�.._p�C�t 3c+ 3 ..a a0tz51 PAGE CHAGE TACATHPIT PLANT LAND Ou The Cast 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 AND the Last 1/2 of the West 1/2 of the southeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of the northeast 1/4 of Section 16, Township 60 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, rloridaj �•- - LESS •the Northerly 70 fist thereof-cor rpsd tights -of -way/ v / purposes • _ vv , • OR: 2282 Not 1907 ` � w oti W� o c .. G� rNE CIRC - • �J u J••• •� •.•�r r! �.O.1 .. � •Oily►� Vwn.. �.. ��... Ciww...• ►.i miss Co�er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE QRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT MAPLES, FLOR{DA 34104 wAvw.4 Oliiergov'11ot (239) 252-2400 FAH: (239) 252-63S8 COVENANT OF UNIFIED CONTROL The undersigned do hereby swear or affirm that we are the fee simple title_ holders and owners of record of property commonly known as Shadommod PUD Tract E, and Airpark North Parcel (Street address and City, State and Zip Code) and legally described In Exhibit A attached hereto. The property described herein is the subject of an application for amending tna _planned unit development { Shadowwood PUD) zoning. We hereby designate Clyde Qulnby legal representative thereof, as the legal representatives of the property and as such, these individuals are authorized to legally bind all owners of the property in the course of seeking the necessary approvals to develop. This authority Includes, but is not limited to, the hiring and authorization of agents to assist in the preparation of applications, plans, surveys, and studies necessary to obtain zoning approval on the site. These representatives will remain the only entity to authorize development activity on the property until such time as a new or amended covenant of unified control Is delivered to Collier County. The undersigned recognize the following and will be guided accordingly in the pursuit of development of the project, 1, The property will be developed and used in conformity with the approved master plan including all conditions placed on the development and all commitments agreed to by the applicant in connection with the planned unit development rezoning, 2. The legal representative identified herein is responsible for compliance with all terms, conditions, safeguards, and stipulations made at the time of approval of the master plan, even if the property is subsequently sold in whole or in part, unless and until a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to and recorded by Collier County. 3, A departure from the provisions of the approved plans or a failure to comply with any requirements, conditions, or safeguards provided for In the planned unit development process will constitute a violation of the Land Development Code. 4. All terms and conditions of the planned unit development approval will be incorporated into covenants and restrictions which run with the land so as to provide notice to subsequent owners that all development activity within the planned unit development must be consistent with those terms and conditions. 5. So long as this covenant is in force, Collier County can, upon the discovery of noncompliance with the terms, safeguards, and conditions of the planned unit development, seek equitable relief as necessary to compel compliance. The County will not issue permits, certificates, or licenses to occupy or use any part of the planned unit development and the County may stop ongoing construction, activity until the project is brought into compliance with all terms, conditions and safeguards of the planned unit development. Owner Owner John W eikoy, Jr„ VP of S.D. Ci , ation of les, Inc. Printed Name — -� Printed Name STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF COLLIER} Sworn to (or affirmed) and subscribed before me this c day of who is personally known to me or has produced February 1, 2019 as idt�rttif ation. r;r,ta�; Public (Name typed, printed or stamped) o"' �--� kEhIEE CUtJM !�� ': �: MY COMhhISS1�7hJ iP Grp 021302 1 GXPIRES: Derem4Wki uer t5, Bonded Thru N'U;2y PoWic, Underwriters Page 8 of 11 EXHIBIT A SHADOWWOOD PUD TRACT E AND AIRPARK NORTH PARCEL LEGAL DESCRIPTION A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA DESCRIPTION OF PART OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA ALL THAT PART OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE EAST 1/2 OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORN ER OF SAID SECTION 16; THENCE ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 16, NORTH 89020105" WEST 630.02 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL HEREIN DESCRIBED; THENCE SOUTH 00°14'25" EAST 170.00 FEET, THENCE SOUTH 27035'38" EAST456,94 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00014'25" EAST 110.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89'45'35" EAST 120.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 22002'30" EAST 107.70 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF A RUNWAY AND TAXIWAY EASEMENTAS DESCRIBED IN O.R. 593 PAGE 301, COLLIER COUNTY PUBLIC RECORDS, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE ALONG SAID WEST LINE SOUTH 00'14'25" EAST 1263.56 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF WING SOUTH PRIVATE VILLAS UNIT T' ACCORDING TO PLATTHEREOF AS RECORDED IN CONDOMINIUM PLAT BOOK 4, PAGE 46, COLLIER COUNTY PUBLIC RECORDS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDAN THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE THE FOLLOWING SIX (6) DESCRIBED COURSES: 1) SOUTH 89*45135" WEST 193.02 FEET; 2) NORTH 62051111" WEST 141.69 FEET, 3) SOUTH 62012'15" WEST 108.47 FEET; 4) SOUTH 89*45135" WEST 500.00 FEET; 5) NORTH 00014125" WEST 16.52 FEET, 6) SOUTH 89045'35" WEST 132.69 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE EAST 1/2 OF SAID SECTION 16; THENCE ALONG SAID WEST LINE NORTH 00°13'25" WEST 2028.59 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 16% THENCE ALONG SAID NORTH LINE SOUTH 89°20'05" EAST 677.23 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL HEREIN DESCRIBED; AND THE NORTHWEST ONE -QUARTER (1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST ONE -QUARTER (1/4) OF THE NORTHEAST ONE -QUARTER (1/4) OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH,. RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; LESS THE SOUTHERLY AND THE WESTERLY 30 FEETTHEREOF FOR ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY PURPOSES: AND PL20190000259 Shadowwood PD! THE NORTHEAST ONE- QUARTER (1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST ONE -QUARTER (1/4} OF THE NORTHEAST ONE -QUARTER (1/4) OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; AND THE SOUTHEAST ONE -QUARTER (1/4} OF THE NORTHWEST ONE -QUARTER (1/4) OF THE NORTHEAST ONE -QUARTER (1/4) OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST; COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; ALL THAT PART OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP SO SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 16, THENCE ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 16, NORTH 890-20'-05" WEST 260.02 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL HEREIN DESCRIBED: THENCE ALONG THE WEST LINE OF A RUNWAY AND TAXIWAY EASEMENTS AS DESCRIBED IN O.R. 593 PAGE 300, COLLIER COUNTY PUBLIC RECORDS, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA SOUTH 00-14"-25" EAST 780.00 FEET, THENCE NORTH 220-02'-30" WEST 107.70 FEET, THENCE SOUTH 890 45"�35" WEST 120.00 FEET, THENCE NORTH 000-14'-25" WEST 110.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 270-35'-38" WEST 456.94 FEET, THENCE NORTH 00044'-25" WEST 170.00 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 16, THENCE ALONG SAID NORTH LINE SOUTH 890-20'-05" EAST 370.00 FEETTO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL HEREIN DESCRIBED, PL20190000259 Shadowwood PDi Shadowwood PUD Amendment Narrative The Peoner is the owner of approximately 78 acres of undeveloped land zoned PUD that carries a vested entitlement for no more than 364 multi -family units. On December 17, 2018, a representative of the land owner met with the Zoning Director Mike Bosi to determine if access to this last, undeveloped portion of the PUD may be from the public roadways abutting the PUD development parcel. The response was yes, but language in the PUD prohibited that. It was further determined by Planner Bosi that the prohibitive language in the PUD was inconsistent with the Future Land Use Element of the County's Growth Management Plan, and that the language could be removed, and arrows added indicating the access to the PUD Master Plan, through the administrative, Insubstantial PUD Amendment (PDi) process. In good faith, the land owner made such application for a PDI and it was distributed for review. During the review, staff determined that public participation was warranted and that a Neighborhood Information Meeting (NiM) must be completed. Therefore, a NIM was held on May 7, 2019. Just prior to that NIM date, staff was alerted that complete notice had not been provided to the Petitioner and that a second NIM must be completed. The Petitioner again went through the expense of conducting another NIM on May 28, 2019. Having run the NIM gauntlet twice, the Petitioner anticipated the conclusion of the access request to be completed with a public hearing before the Hearing Examiner when they learned that the PDI process had been elevated from an Insubstantial modification, as directed by Zoning Director Bosi, to now an amendment to the PUD requiring public hearings with both the Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners. Attendant to the elevation of the Petition pt•ocess, Transportation Planning Staff, via email, requested that a traffic study be prepared that demonstrates the probable distribution of the traffic that might be generated from the approved residential units onto the existing, abutting, public roadway system. The Petitioner/Land Owner holds title to approximately 4.35 acres of land described as "Airpark North" in the legal description of Lite Deed and survey attendant to this Petition. This Airpark North parcel is a remnant of the commercial component of the original PUD that was deleted and partially aggregated into Tract B through the 2008 PUD Amendment. This remnant parcel located in the northeast corner of the PUD, adjacent and east of the existing aircraft runway, is now proposed to be aggregated into Tract E as depicted on the updated PUD Master Plan. Finally, with the County's elevation of the Petition to an amendment of the PUD, the Petitioner must now update the residential land uses and development standards for Tract E, as that was presumed to be beyond the scope of the original insubstantial amendment process. Again, the primary objective of the land owner is to allow connection to the existing, abutting, public roadway system. However, just as the PUD is antiquated in relation to interconnectivity, it lacks the variety of residential land uses and development standards currently provided for in the LDC and adopted PUD Zoning Districts in Collier County. To that end, please find the proposed revisions to Section IV of the PUD Document. While single-family land uses have been added as permitted principal land uses in Tract E, the number of single-family units, or mix of single-family and multi -family land uses will be defined at time of development order submittal by the ultimate developer of Tract E. The Transportation Division Staff have required that residential development be limited by cap based PM Peak Hour traffic generation. As such, the number of single-family units, or multifamily units, or the a combination of both will be determined at the time of a development order request. As land owner without development intent, the Petitioner cannot define a plan of development for that Tract E. Particular attention was paid to the formatting of the proposed text modifications to follow the desired layout prescribed by the LDC. Table 1 has been inserted into Section IV.3.I. to provide development standards for the residential land uses permitted in Tract E. Those residential development standards have been gleaned from the .DC, and more recent PUD's adopted by the BCC that provide for the full range of residential land uses. No development standards proposed in Table 1 are unique to this PUD. The Petitioner assumes that development Page 1 of 7 Shado��vood PUDA — PL201900002�9 l2,/0�/2019 standards that are a part of the LDC Zoning District regulations have been properly vetted in the past and suitable for use in this Shadowwood PUD Zoning District. While the Petitioner is not rezoning any land, County review staff requested responses related to the LDC's review considerations associated with amendments to existing zoning districts. The following responses are provided associated with LDC Section 10.02.08.F.: 1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies and future land use map and the elements of the Growth Management Plan, Response: While all residential development approved in the Shadow Wood PUD has been found to be in compliance with the Collier County Growth Management Plan at the time development order requests were approved, this PUD Amendment will bring the PUD into greater conformance with the GMP by implementing the following GMP Policies: Future Land Use Element Policy 7.1: The County shall encourage developers and property owners to connect their properties to fronting collector and arterial roads, except where no such connection can be made without violating intersection spacing requirements of the Land Development Code. Future Land Use Element Policy 7.2: The County shall encourage internal accesses or loop roads in an effort to help reduce vehicle congestion on nearby collector and arterial roads and minimize the need for traffic signals. Future Land Use Element Policy 7.3: All new and existing developments shall be encouraged to connect their local streets and/or interconnection points with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless of land use type. Transportation Element Policy 9.3: The County shall requite, whet ever feasible, the interconnection of local stt eets between developments to facilitate convenient movement throughout the road network. The LDC shall identify the circumstances and conditions that would require the interconnection of neighboring developments, and shall also develop standards and criteria for the safe interconnection of such local streets. The proposed graphic addition of access arrows to the PUD Master Plan to provide for ingress and egress to Tract E will resolve a potential danger in traffic circulation wherein the roadway improved within Wing South Private Villas is also used as a taxiway for private aircraft transiting to and from home hangers and the private airstrip. 2. The existing land use pattern. Response: At the time of original PUD Zoning adoption in 1982, the airstrip and Wing South Private Villas Unit lwere existing, and sparsely scattered single-family development was occurring west of the PUD lands. Since 1982, lands to the north, east and south have been developed with urban densities, and this urban expansion pattern of development has progressively grown on lands to the west to include single-family and multi -family development. 3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. Response: The Shadowwood PUD Zoning District was adopted prior to most of the residential development surrounding the PUD lands. The proposed PUD amendment does not create an isolated zoning district. Page 2 of 7 Shado��wood PUDA — PL201900002�9 l2/01/2019 4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. Response: The subject PUD amendment Petition does not expand the boundaries of the Shadowwood PUD. The Petition will assimilate a 4.35 acre parcel previously intended for aircraft maintenance and refueling into Tract E, which is designated for residential development by the PUD Ordinance, 5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed amendment necessary. Response: As stated previously, single-family homes were being constructed on lots defined through the Wing South Private Villas Unit 1 Condominium Plat. It was understood that this subdivision would be interconnected to lands north and south as is evidenced through the defined 50-foot access easements terminating at the northern and southern plat boundaries. This understanding was continued, and carried forward through the adoption of the Shadowwood PUD where the developing Wing South Private Villas would be integrated into the traffic circulation of the land uses approved in the PUD as evidenced in the PUD Master Plan. The proposed graphic addition of access arrows to the PUD Master Plan will provide for ingress and egress to Tract E from the public roadway system abutting the northwesterly portion of the PUD. Further, access from the abutting public roadway system will resolve a potential danger in traffic circulation wherein the roadway improved within Wing South Private Villas is also used as a taxiway for private aircraft transiting to and from home hangers and the private airstrip. 6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. Response: Granting access to the remaining development parcel from the public roadway system abutting the PUD boundaly will ameliorate an anticipated public hazard, and will bring the existing PUD into conformance with the interconnectivity mandates of the GMP. Future development on the subject Tract E will be in conformance with the applicable provisions of the LDC, the Administrative Code, and the PUD Ordinance and should not adversely impact living conditions in the neighborhood. 7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peals volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety. Response: The Transportation Division's data on surrounding roadways demonstrates that there is more than adequate capacity to support the existing development entitlements. Operational impacts will be addressed at the time of first development order (i.e: SDP or PPL). Additionally, the development order approval process will address, and ensure compliance with all other concurrency management provisions associated with sustaining the capital public facilities that will serve this and other residential land uses in the community. 8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem. Response: The subject Tract E has been significantly encumbered by County regional drainage improvements that must be maintained in perpetuity and must be separate and apart from the project related water management improvements. The project related stormwater management design will be reviewed and permitted through the Environmental Resource Permit process administered by the South Florida Water Management District. County staff will evaluate the stormwater management system at the time of SDP or PPL review. 9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas. Page 3 of 7 Shado�ti�ood PUDA — PL201900002�9 12/04/2019 Response: None of the proposed changes to the existing zoning district are anticipated to have any affect to reduce solar radiation or divert wind circulation to the surrounding neighborhood. 10. Whether the proposed change will adversely affect property values in the adjacent area. Response: The proposed modifications to the existing zoning entitlement should have no affect on surrounding property values. In fact, property value is affected by many factors. it is driven by market conditions and is generally a subjective determination. Zoning alone is not likely to adversely affect the property values. Generally, market conditions will prevail. 11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. Response: Most of the adjacent property is already developed with single-family residential uses. The requested access to the existing PUD Zoning District is not likely to deter the continued expansion of urban development activity surrounding. 12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare. Response: The proposed modifications to the existing PUD Zoning District will bring the PUD into compliance with the Future Land Use Element and Transportation Element. As such, the PUD will be consistent with public policy and the changes do not result in the granting of a special privilege. Consistency with the FLUE is determined to be consistent with public welfare. 13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning. Response: The subject Tract E of the existing PUD Zoning District can be used in accordance with the provisions of the PUD, however the proposed connection to the public roadway system abutting the PUD is required for compliance with the County's interconnectivity mandates of the GMP, and will ameliorate an anticipated public hazard where pedestrians and vehicles might conflict with offsite aircraft operations. 14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the county. Response: With the understanding that the existing PUD Zoning District predates the majority of the residential development in the area, the requested changes to the existing PUD Zoning District will not be out of scale with the expansion of urban land uses in the area. In fact, the inclusion of single-family land uses in Tract E may enhance the future development pattern of the surrounding area. 15. Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. Response: This finding criterion is not applicable given that the PUD Zoning District is already in existence. 16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. Response: Any development contemplated by the existing PUD Ordinance would have and will have required significant site alteration as was the case with other completed phases of the overall PUD development. The subject Tract E is vacant and heavily wooded and razing, and land balancing would be Page 4 of 7 Shado��wood PUDA — PL20 l 900002�9 12/04/2019 required prior to any development activity at the site. The County's Administrative Code will provide development standards and procedures that will be applied during the SDP and/or PPL review processes. 17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance [Code ch. 106, art. II], as amended. Response: The land uses permitted and residential densities approved with the adoption of the Shadowwood PUD Zoning District have been contemplated in the provision of Capital Public Facilities that have been constructed or will be constructed to serve the subject development and surrounding urban development. Application of the County's concurrency management of public facilities will be a part of the next to occur development order review process, whether it is Plans and Plat, and/or Site Development Plan. 18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare. Again, while the Petitioner is not rezoning any land, review staff t•equested responses related to the LDC's review considerations associated with amendments to existing zoning districts. The following responses are provided associated with LDC Section 10.02.13.B.: a. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. Response: The subject property is located in the Urban Mixed Use -Urban Residential Land Use category. This land use category permits a variety of residential dwelling types and densities governed by the FLUE Density Rating System. The existing PUD's residential density is 3.4 dwelling units per gross project acre and is consistent with the Density Rating System. No additional lands nor residential units are being requested to be added to the existing PUD Zoning District through this amendment Petition The undeveloped portion of the site is mostly surrounded by existing single and multifamily development, including Naples Heritage Golf & Country Club to the north, Naples Lakes Country Club to the east, Lely Resort to the south, and single-family and multi -family development to the west. The property has direct access onto Polly Avenue, Adkins Avenue, and Whitaker Drive, all local public roadways that intersects with Santa Barbara Boulevard to the west. Sewer and water will be provided by Collier County Utilities. Other public facilities and community services are also currently available to the site. Typically, runoff from the development area will be collected by a series of swales and inlets and directed to proposed water management lakes) which would be connected to the County's regional stormwater improvements surrounding the northern Tract E. The outfall location for the development parcel will be defined when a developer and land use plan are proposed for permitting with the SFWMD through the ERP process. Due to the interconnected nature of the project, the minimum road and finished floor elevations in the undeveloped portion of the PUD are anticipated to be the similar to the surrounding neighborhood. Proposed lakes will provide the detention volume requited to meet the South Florida Water Management District's treatment and attenuation requirements. The traffic study submitted as part of this application determined that all roadway segments surrounding the project site are anticipated to operate at an acceptable LOS at project build -out and no additional roadway improvements are warranted. b. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing opet ation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to Page 5 of 7 Shado��wood PUDA — PL201900002�9 12/0�1/2019 be provided or maintained at public expense. Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the County Attorney. Response: SD Corporation of Naples, Inc. is the owner of the property and has demonstrated unified control through the various affidavits provided as part of this application. Operation and maintenance responsibility for community areas and facilities shall be assigned to the ultimate developer of the subject Tract E. The future development will be required to go through platting and/or site development plan approval, which will further document the proper stipulations and assignments of responsibility for operation and maintenance of infrastructure by the developer. c. Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives, policies, and the Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan, Response: The existing Shadowwood PUD Zoning District includes a variety of residential uses, including single-family and multi -family units. Other permitted uses include aircraft runways and taxiways, water management lakes, preserves, ancillary recreational uses, open space and internal roadways with sidewalks. The existing PUD Zoning District was found to be in compliance with the goals, objectives and policies set forth in the GMP by virtue of the existence of the zoning district adoption and past amendment by the Board of County Commissioners. The subject property is located within the Urban Mixed Use -Urban Residential Subdistrict, as depicted on the Collier County Future Land Use Map (FLUM). According to the Growth Management Plan (GMP), the intent of the Urban Mixed Use District is to accommodate a variety of residential and non-residential land uses, including mixe&use developments such as Planned Unit Developments. The Urban Residential Subdistrict provides for higher densities in areas where existing and planned public facilities are concentrated and there are fewer environmental constraints. The Urban Residential Subdistrict permits a base density of four (4) residential units per gross acre. No lands are being added to the existing PUD Zoning District and no additional residential dwelling units are being proposed through this Petition mandated by County staff. The Shadow -wood PUD's existing residential density entitlement of 3.4 dwelling units per gross project acre is consistent with the residential densities allowed by the FLUE Density Rating System. The subject property is located within an Urban Designated Area which has the necessary infrastructure and public facilities available to support the continued development of the existing PUD. d. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. Response: The location of the last remaining development tract in the Shadowwood PUD is relatively isolated from potential impacts on surrounding residential land uses given the conservation areas established adjacent to the north in the Naples Heritage Golf & Country Club PUD, to the east in the County's Serenity Park, and also the conservation tract of the Naples Lakes PUD adjacent and east of the PUD boundary. Future development on Tract E will be compatible with the single-family neighborhood lying south of Tract E in the Wing South Private Villas Unit, given the 70± foot drainage easement encumbering Tract E's southern boundary and the fact that a landscape buffer will be installed along that same southern boundary. Finally, future development proposed on Tract E will be separated from any existing single-family home to the west by either a conservation area or landscape buffer as prescribed by the LDC. e. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. Response: Development proposed on the remaining undeveloped Tract E will provide a minimum of 60 percent common open space as required by the Collier County Land Development Code. Usable open space areas include common areas, pedestrian walkways, lakes, recreation areas, and preservation tracts. The on - Page 6 of 7 Shado��ood PUDA — PL201900002�9 12/04/2019 sRe preserve area, and/or preservation commitments are provided for by Ordinance 824;, Exhibit KZ JV Sheet 2 of 2. f. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. Response: County documentation demonstrates adequate public facilities are available to serve the future development of Tract E. Both potable water and sanitary sewer service is available south of Tract E, and in the Santa Barbara Blvd. Rights -of -Way. Existing roadway capacity and drainage features are adequate for the site; and schools, police, fire, bus, park, and health care facilities are all located within the proposed development's service area. Waste management, cable, electric, and telephone services are also available. g. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. Response: No land area expansion of the existing PUD is proposed through this amendment Petition. There are undeveloped lands to the west of the existing PUD boundary that could be used for expansion of the PUD in the future. There are no contiguous undeveloped lands to the north, south, or east of the PUD that are not alt•eady zoned for development or held in conservation, and therefore, expansion would be prohibited. h. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. Response: The proposed development standards conform with the intent of the LDC's PUD regulations by establishing development regulations that are consistent with similar, existing residential developments permitted and constructed throughout Collier County, Page 7 of 7 Shado��ood PUDA — PLZ01900002�9 l2/0�1/2019 LEGEND - - EXISTING FORCE MAIN POTENTIAL FORCE MAIN PUD MASTER PLAN.dwg, Aug 30, 2019, 4:29pm REVISIONS 9/2/20 CREATED PER RAI #3 -- EXISTING WATER MAIN �' -� � `POTENTIAL WATER MAIN HAGAN ENGINEERING NAPLESLAKES COUNTRY CLUB CE =CONSERVATION EASEMENT POT. = POTENTIAL REC = RECREATION SHADOWWOOD PUDA Pl.2019000025`' SHADOWWOOD UTILITY EXHIBIT AIL 4102 1250 TAMIAMI TRNORTH, STE. 203B DATE PROJECT N0, SCALE SHEEP Naples, Florida 38/2019 Phone (239) 851-8239 AS Shown 1 OF 1 z Published Daily Naples, FL 34110 Affidavit %F Publication State of Florida Counties of Collier and Lee Before the undersigned they serve as the authority, personally appeared Natalie 2ollar who on oath says that she serves as Inside Sales Manager of the Naples Daily News, a daily newspaper published at Naples, in Collier County, Florida;distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida; that the attached copy of the advertisi ng was published in said newspaper on dates listed. Affiant further says that the said Naples Daily News is a newspaper published at Na- ples, in said Collier County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Collier County, Florida; distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida, each day and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Naples, in said Collier County, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, or corporation an discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. ri Customer A Num er Copy ine HAGEN ENGINEERING Pub Dates April 22, 2019 (Signature of afFiantJ Sworn to and subscribed before me This May 01, 2019 (Signature of arrant) 2271320 1/4 page ad -please �' NARQI, E KJINGAS . .�� NotxyPubtic-AafioFFlorld� Carrrrfssion f GG 12fi011 �,,,,Jr d1"UAWL*KK1✓WOW7AW 20A I MONDAY, APRIL 22. 2019 1 NAPLES DAILY NEWS Safety standards could save new moms Alison Young JSA 7uOAY RTaternity hospitals across tfie coun- try would be required to do more to pre- vent dearth- delivcrics under standards proposed this week by the nation's larg- est hospital accreditation group. If adopted, about 2,700 birthing hos- pitals would be required by the Joint Comission to take specific actions re lated to severe bleeding and dangerous- ly high blood pressure. For years, these measures have been recommended to protect mothers - but too often they are ignored, helping drive the USA's status as the most dangerous place to give birth among developed na- tions. Hospitals that failed to follow there- v iirements could lose their .Joint Com- mission accreditation. "Having a stick, if you will, having benchmark requirements for their ac- m pre credi[a[ion will really drite hospitals with limited resources to put these in place," said Barbara Levy, vice president for health policy at the American Col- lege of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. The proposed accreditation require- ments come in the wake of an ongoing USA TODAY investigation of the role that substandard hospital care plays in ventable deaths and injuries - and the lack of national requirements for maternity units to follow established safety practices and publicly report IF childhirth complication rates. Tt's a tribute to you, a tribute to the media and you in particular," said Levy of USA TODAY's Deadly Deliveries in- vestigation. Every year in the USA, about 700 omen die and 50,000 suffer severe in- juries related to childbirth. The problem I particularly acute among black moth- ers, who die at three or four times the rate of white mothers. Reviews found WE DESIGN 4VE MEASURE NJE INSTALL. YOU RELAX!' f GET ONE 50% OF` on Custom Blinds, Shades & Drapery F CALL TO SCHEDULE FREE in -home design consultation with no obligation! ,n.�ti,BLrvDs , ,_- (239) 747-6783 SheHGenie EVERYTHING WITHIN REACH Schedule your free design consultation (888) 886-6133 Enjoy more space with custom pull-out shelves for your existing cabinets, a® 'Um�l one offer p_r household ruuui�.l. purchases uf4 or mureClassic Ur U_s One•Llide-_ut"she ves EYplres S�lltr019.lifalime;,.a••anlrvalih fnrCasslr Fir OaslQ�er Solu'Inns learn mn•e al shelfQenie r^m that better care could hate saved about half of the mothers who died. Hemorrhage and severe hyperien- ,ion are two of the leading preventable can of maternal deaths and injuries. Women bleed to death orneed hvsterce- tomies to save their lives when doctors and nurses fail to recognize that normal bleeding has become life -threatening. They suffer strokes because of delays in recring pressure -lowering drugs. Da%1d Baker, the Joint Commission's executive vice president for health care quality evaluation, said adding the re- quirements could make a difference in addressing these two childbirth compli- cations that are responsible for about 40°6 of mothers' deaths. his is really a national problem as you have shown in your work," Baker said. 'Based on our analyses, we tinought there were things that every hospital in the United States could do to try to decrease women's risk from hav- ing death from either maternal hemor- rfiage or severe blood pressure:' Wednesday, the Joint Commission - which voluntarily accredits about 70°6 of the nation's hospitals - began taking public counncnLa Fill the proposal re- quirements. Baker said he expects a final decision to be made shortly after the comment period closes May29. If adopted, the re- quirements would take effect within six to 12 months, he said. The standards would require hospi- tals to assess mothers For hemorrhage risks, have procedures that identify when bleeding becomes dangerous and ensure it is treated appropriately with medications that are immediately avail- able on the obstetric unit. Hospitals would have to develop pro- cedures to measure blood pressure ac- curately and set criteria to identify and treat patients whose pressures cross into the danger zone. NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION i\'IEETING Please be advised that S.D. Corporation of Naples, Inc. has submitted an Insubstantial PUD Amendment Petition PL20190000259 to Collier County to provide for access to the public roadway network tot- the previously approved the Shadowwood PUD. The Shadowwood Planned Unit Development (PUD) is located north of Rattlesnake Hammock Road and east of Santa Barbara Boulevard, generally lying east of the terminus of Whitaker Road and Adkins Avenue. The prior approval of the PUD in 1982 restricted vehicular access to Rattlesnake Hammock Road only. The County's interconnectivity requirements make these access restrictions illegal. The landowner/Petitioner is being required to add access locations to the PUD Master Plan and remove the restricted access language in the PUD Ordinance. o Project Location m o T 7 C J 0 m O U 01 0 Rattlesnake Hammock RD U The public is invited to attend a Neighborhood Information Ndeeting to be held on Tuesday, May 7, 2019 at 5:30 p.m. at the Mayflower Congregational United Church of Christ, located at 2900 County Barn Rd, Naples, Florida 34112. if you are unable to attend this meeting but have questions or comments, the}r may be directed by mail, e-mail, or phone to the individuals listed below. Clyde Quinby, Agent Clyde Quinby Realty 3785 Airport Road North Suite B Naples, Florida 34105 c.quinby n aol.com (239)261-1166 AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLIANCE I hereby certify that pursuant to Ordinance 200441, of the Collier County all Development Code, I did cause the attached newspaper advertisement to appear and I did give notice by mail to the following property owners and/or condominium and civic associations whose members may be affected by the proposed land use changes of an application request for a rezoning, PUD amendment, or conditional use, at least 15 days prior to the scheduled Neighborhood Information Meeting. For the purposes of this requirement, the names and addresses of property owners shall be deemed those appearing on the latest tax rolls of Collier County and any other persons or entities who have made a formal request of the county to be notified. The said notice contained the laymen's description of the site property of proposed change and the date, time, and place of a Neighborhood Information Meeting. Per the attached letters, property owner's list, and copy of newspaper advertisement which are hereby made a part of this Affidavit of Compliance (Signat�ire of.) Applicant) State of Florida County of Collier The foregoing Affidavit of compliance was acknowledged before me this 2019 by 7 known to me or who has pi i (Si�riature of Notary Public) Printed Name of Notary G:WIM Procedures/Affidavit Of Compliance - NIM Oct2010.Doc day of who is personally as identification. (Notary Seal) DENEEDUNN '' k �'•.; = h1Y CU1.Ihtii5Si�7t� R GG 021302 .��+ ... EXPIRES: pecember 15, 20�0 = TbN Notary plitlilo Ur Clyde C. Qul*nby Realty, Inc. 3785 AIRPORT N. SUITE B NAPLES, FL 34105 April 19, 2019 Re: Neighborhood [nfor►nation Meeting (NIM); PDl-PL20190000259, Shadowwood PUD Dear Property Owner: Please be advised that S.D. Corporation of Naples, Inc. has submitted a petition to Collier County to provide for access to the public roadway network for the previously approved the Shado�vwood PUD. The Shadowwood Planned [Jnit Development (PUD) is located north of` Rattlesnake Ela�nmock Road and east of Santa Barbara Boulevard, generally lying east of the terminus of Whitaker Road and Adkins Avenue. The prior approval of the PUD in 1982 restricted vehicular access to Rattlesnake Hammock Road only. The County's public policy advances and adoption of interconnectivity requirements in the Collier County Growth Management Plan make these access restrictions illegal. The landowner/Petitioner is being required to add access locations to the PUD Master Plan and remove the restricted access language in the PUJD Ordinance. In compliance with the finding of the Cullier County Hearing Examiner, and pw•suant to the requirements of the Land Development Code, a Neighborhood information Meeting (N1M) will be held to provide you an opportunity to become fully aware of the potential access locations being added to the Shadowwood PUD Master Plan. It should be understood that no development is currently being proposed, The County is mandating the addition of potential access locations. The Neighborhood Information Meeting will be held on Tuesday, May 7, 2019 at 5:30 p.m. at the Mayflower Congregational United Church of Christ located at 2900 County Barn Rd, Naples, Florida 34112. At this meeting the land owner's representatives and County Staff will be available to explain die need for the insubstantial zoning modification acid answer questions. Should you have any questions in advance of the evening meeting, please feel free to contact me at the address above or by phone at (239) 26l-i 166. Sincerely Clyde Quinby, Agent 1 d Protect oc Location m o � ao o O Rattlesnake Hamm U ock RD , a I d AVCR 5160® Casy reel - iAuaress Laws Bend along line toexpose Pop-up Edge® d it uo to avery.com/remplaies i Use AveryTemplate S160 I NAPLES HERITAGE GOLF & COUNTRY CLUB INC 8150 HERITAGE CLUB WAY NAPLES, FL 34112�7703 COLLIER CNTY C/0 REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TW IAM I TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112 7685 COLONIAL CT REALTY TRUST 53 FRENCH STREET HINGHAM, MA 02043 SABOT,IAY M 4049 SKYWAY DRIVE NAPLES, FL 34112 FILITI, VALERIA 5143 THRESHER DRIVE 502 NAPLES, FL 34112 THE BRUCE A BISCORNET TRUST 4176 SKYWAY DR NAPLES, FL 34112-2928 C R D DEVELOPERS OF NAPLES INC PO BOX 39 SEEKONK, MA 02771 MICHIE, DINA B KATHERINE MCCARTHY 5153 THRESHER DR NAPLES, FL 341124905 KNIGHT, LISSETY 6123 THRESHER DRIVE #302 NAPLES, FL 34112 MCKINLEY, PHYLLIS J 6131 THRESHER DR #401 NAPLES, FL 34112 HUBER, JOSEPH V & BARBARA M 3645 STATE ROUTE 982 LATROBE, PA 15650-3910 NAPLES HERITAGE CMMTY DEV DIST 210 N UNIVERSITY DR STE 702 CORAL SPRINGS, FL 33071 MARGARET L SHERMAN DECL TRUST 510 GRAND BLVD PARK RIDGE, IL 60068-3435 EPPERLY, LLOYD A JOYCE RUTH EPPERLY 4164 SKYWAY DR NAPLES, FL 34112-2928 FOUST, LINDA L 6145 THRESHER DR NAPLES, FL 34112-1905 C R & D DEVELOPERS OF NAPLES CHARLES TAPALIAN PO BOX 39 SEEKONK, MA 02771 REICHENBERG, EDWARD J 6147 THRESHER DR NAPLES, FL 341124905 LAMERS, JUDITH A 6117 THRESHER DR NAPLES, FL 34112-1905 COONES JR, ARNOLD L & SHELRE J 6125 THRESHER DR NAPLES, FL 34112-1905 NAPLES LKS COUNTRY CLUB HOMEOWNERS ASSOC INC 4784 NAPLES LAKES BLVD NAPLES, FL 34112 BOISSONNEAULT, BART 215 N PINE ST CHARLOTTE, NC 28202 BERRY, MARK 4188 SKYWAY DR NAPLES, FL 34112 KLATT, ROBERT FRANK EDILMA R LOPERA AGUDELO 4158 SKYWAY DR NAPLES, FL 34112 TRIBEC GROUP INTERNATIONAL INC 2945 ODESA DR MEDINA, OH 44256 GRAFTON, RICHARD D & SONIA JO 4218 SKYWAY DR NAPLES, FL 34112-1902 BEREZOVSKY, ALEX MARINA BEREZOVSKAYA 3960 ISLA CIUDAD COURT NAPLES, FL 34109 SUCHOCKI, TONI JAN BRUCE ANTHONY 6121 THRESHER DR NAPLES, FL 341124905 MAPLES, KEITH D 6127 THRESHER DR NAPLES, FL 34112 THOMAS L CUNNINGHAM TRUST 6133 THRESHER DR #402 NAPLES, FL 34112-1905 Pat: averyoom/patents ; �tiquettes d`adresse Easy Peel® � I Replle=� la hachure aE1n de rbv�ler le reborcl Pop -ups Aflez � avery.ca/gabarits � Utllfsez IeGabarltAvery 5160 1 AI VERYe tasy reel Adaress Laneis vo to avery.com/templates Bend along line to expose Pop-up Edge® Use AveryTemplate 5160 1 VALENTE, CARLA T RAYMOND E VALENTE 11 5135 THRESHER DR NAPLES, FL 34112-1905 HANKIN1 LOIS D 6157 THRESHER DR NAPLE54 FL 34112-1905 COPPOLA, MAR1A LISA GARRABRANT 5165 THRESHER DR NAPLES, FL 34112-1905 YEARTON, VICTORIA LYNN DIENER 6140 THRESHER DR #802 NAPLES, FL 34112 MARILYN K MELONE EST MICHAEL E MELONE PR 662 CASSIE DRIVE JOLIET, IL 60435 MAURER, BRENT & CATHY 6268 SHADOWOOD CIR NAPLES, FL 34112-1906 BYERS, THOMAS A & CRYSTA R 6122 THRESHER DR NAPLES, FL 34112-1904 KURT BLUMENTHAL TRUST 118 PALMETTO DUNES CIR NAPLES, FL 34113-7560 LOUISE K ECHT TRUST 29437 VINEWOOD DR WICKLIFFE, OH 44092 MARTIN, JANE CRAIG JOBIN 6242 SHADOWOOD CIRCLE NAPLES, FL 34135 DAVISOIV, CHRISTINE M SYLVESTRE, EDNER A & PIERCILIA 6137 THRESHER DR 6155 THRESHER DR MAPLES, FL 34112-1905 NAPLES, FL 34112-1905 ALVARADO, DEMISE SHARON B PREYSS REV LIV TRUST 6161 THRESHER DRIVE #701 195 VINTAGE CIRCLE #202 NAPLES, FL 34112 NAPLES, FL 34119 CANON, CLAUDIA HICKEY, KEVIN A 6141 THRESHER DRIVE 6142 THRESHER DR NAPLES, FL 34112 NAPLES, FL 341124904 DETTIS, JOHNNA L 6136 THRESHER DR TRUST 6138 THRESHER DR 720 GOODLETTE RD N #304 NAPLES, FL 341124904 NAPLES, FL 34102 MILLER, REGINA SOREY, KEVIN K GERALD DOUGLAS MILLER 6128 THRESHER DR #903 401 MAXWELL AVE NAPLES, FL 34110 ROYAL OAK, M 1 48067-4606 LAMBERT, JENNEINE CLARK, JOHN R 6272 SHADOWOOD CIRCLE 612fi THRESHER DR NAPLES, FL 34112 NAPLES, FL 341124904 BERNHARDT, CHARLES THEODORE ZOCCO, PAUL 6120 THRESHER DR #1002 156 SHORECREST CT NAPLES, FL 34112 MARCO ISLAND, FL 34145 GADDER, SARA J RICHARDSON, WILLIAM 6286 SHADOWOOD CIRCLE BRIAN KOZAK NAPLES, FL 34112-1906 6113 THRESHER DRIVE NAPLES, FL 34112 NIETZMAN, HAMS G & LESLEY P THOMPSON, LAWRENCE E 6104 THRESHER DR # 1103 SHARON L THOMPSON NAPLES, FL 341124904 3907 ENGLAND DR SHELBYVILLE, MI 49344-9608 WALLACE, DIANNE M HEFLIN, DONALD L 6244 SHADOWOOD CIR 6246 SHADOWOOD CIR NAPLES, FL 34112-1906 NAPLES, FL 34112-1906 Pat: avery,com/patents ; �tiquektes d'adresse Easy Peel® � � Repllez � la hachur©afro de r6v�ler to rebord Pop-up° 1 Allez � avery.ca/gabarits � Utlllsez le Gabarlt Avery 5160 1 j"RYa tasy reel Aaaress Laaets a cuo to avery.com/templates Bend along line to expose Pop-up Edge® r Use AveryTemplate 5160 JADITH ENTERPRISES LLC JACQUELINE S WINNER 4249 QUAIL LANDING POWELL, OH 43065 CORPORA FAMILY TRUST 6256 SHADOWOOD CIR #1303 f\IAPLE% FL 34112 AMATO INVESTMENTS LLC 3591 SPARROW POND CIRCLE AKRON, OH 44333 EMERSON TR, PATRICIA M PATRICIA M EMERSON REV TRUST 5276 SHADOWOOD CIR NAPLES, FL 34112-1906 NUCCIO, COLLEEN 5284 SHADOWOOD CIR #1602 NAPLES, FL 341124906 BETANCOURT, RAUL & ALICE J 6296 SHADOWOOD CIR #1703 NAPLES, FL 34112-1906 HUDSON, DOUGLAS W 5 FORTSIDE DRIVE APT 3 COVINGTON, KY 41011 HOCEVAR TR, RICHARD G ANNETTE E HOCEVAR TR 5208 SHADOWOOD CIR NAPLES, FL 341124906 HAS5ETT, JOSEPH DONNA HA5SETT 5287 SHADOWOOD CIR NAPLES, FL 341124907 CELCE, FREDERICK 4212 SKYWAY DR NAPLES, FL 34112-1612 BAUER, LEE RAY B & MARLENE A JOBIN, CRAIG C 6167 THRESHER DR # 704 GINA JOBIN NAPLES, FL 34112=1905 6254 SHADOWOOD CIR NAPLES, FL 341124906 KNIGHT, PATRICIA P R A& G E MINARD LIV TRUST 6258 SHADOWOOD CIR 6262 SHADOWOOD CIR #1401 NAPLES, FL 341124906 NAPLES, FL 34112 CASSIDY, KRISTIN LYN ERICKSON, NORMAN J & PAULETTE DAVID SCOTT NOBLES 1499 BAYHILL DR 6266 SHADOWOOD CIR #1403 NEW LENOX, IL 60451-3468 NAPLES, FL 34112 BOLTON, PETER G VALLE, BLAS R & ELVIRA G TRACY L EDMONDSON 6282 SHADOWOOD CIR 3904 SKYWAY DR NAPLES, FL 34112 NAPLES, FL 34112=2925 WASHBURN, JERRY C & MARSHA A MACHOULE, JULIEN & VERONIQUE 9414 AETNA ROAD 6294 SHADOWOOD CIR CHURUBUSCO, IN 46723 NAPLES, FL 34112 MlTCHELL, KEITH A REED, WALTER R WAYNE B MITCHELL RITA VENTURA 6252 SHADOWOOD CIR 14871 SW 136TH PLACE NAPLES, FL 34112-1906 MIAMI, FL 33186 HEISE, MAUREEN N JEQUIER, VIOLETTE 6204 SHADOWOOD CIR # 1902 3790 27TH AVENUE SW NAPLES, FL 341124906 NAPLES, FL 34117 MINGS, HOLLY LAUTH THOMPSON, RICHARD L & KANDY L 6273 SHADOWOOD CIR 6289 SHADOWOOD CIRCLE #2401 NAPLES, FL 34112-1907 NAPLES, FL 34112 GORDON, MICHAEL J & BETH A KONDA, PIEDAD 9 N HURD CIRCLE 6283 SHADOWOOD CIRCLE #2404 AUBURN, NY 13021 NAPLES, FL 34112 ALAN W ZIELINSKI DECL TRUST CLAREY, ROBERT F & EDITH J 7640 N MILWAUKEE AVE 163 MICHAWANIC RD # 6 D NILES, IL 60714-3133 SANBORNVILLE, NH 03872 Pat: averyoom/patents ; �tiquettes d'adresse Easy Peel® r i Repllez � la hachure afln de r+�v�ler le rebord Pop-up' � Allez � averyca/gabarits i Utlllsez le Gabarlt Avery 5160 � 5160® i Easy NeelwAddress Labels C;o to avery.com/templates jEaF Rye I Bend along llne to expose Pop-up Edge° D Use Avery Template 5160 1 C R & D DEVELOPERS OF MAPLES yo CHARLES TAPALIAN PO BOX 39 SEEKONK, MA 02771 PRITCHARD, JENNIFER TRIBBLE, DAMES P 6203 -FI]RESHER DR 6105 THRESHER DRIVE #103 NAPO FI_ 34112-1905 NAPLES, FL 34112 SMITH, DAWN M KOZAK, BRlAN 6111 THRESHER DRIVE #201 WILLIAM RICHARDSON NAPLES, FL 34112 6113 THRESHER DR NAPLES, FL 341124905 MARTlN, JANE OWENS, JEAN M CRAIG C JOBIN 6214 SHADOWOOD CIR 6254 SHADOWOOD CIR NAPLES, FL 34112-1906 NAPLES, FL 34112 LIZOTTE, EDWARD & DOROTHY K COCHRAN, RITA JANE 6218 SHADOWOOD CIRCLE 6222 SHADOWOOD CIR NAPLES, FL 34112 NAPLES, FL 34112-1906 BEREZOVSKAYA, MARINA RUSSELL TR, PAMELA ALEX BEREZOVSKY 6228 SHADOWOOD CIR #2104 3960 ISLA CIUDAD COURT NAPLES, FL 34112-1906 NAPLES, FL 34109 WIGLEY, IRENA CRAIN, BONNY LEA 6298 SHADOWOOD CfR # 1704 6302 SHADOWOOD CIR NAPLES, FL 34112-1906 NAPLES, FL 341124909 BROWN, MARY B SPRANG, CARL & JANET 6312 SHADOWOOD CIRCLE #1801 2 COBBLESTONE CT NAPLES, FL 34112 COLUMBUS, NJ 08022-1969 ECKERT, DAVID F MALONE, CHERYL K MARCIA BLAIS ECKERT 1676 19TH ST SW 8566 MANDERSTON CT NAPLES, FL 341174448 FORT MYERS, FL 33912 STEGENGA, SANDRA J MAY, BRANDON M 6279 SHADOWOOD CIR #2301 654 LAMBTON LANE NAPLES, FL 34112-1907 NAPLES, FL 34104 DAMIANO, ARMAND A & MARY K 709 HUNTON PLACE NE LEESBURG, VA 20176 HETZNER, MARK 6107 THRESHER DR NAPLES, FL 341124905 KURT BLUMENTHAL TRUST 118 PALMETTO DUNES CIR NAPLES, FL 34113 FRASE, KRIS A DARLENE KING 6216 SHADOWOOD CIR NAPLES, FL 34112-1906 CONLEY, THOMAS R 2850 59TH STREET S #309 GULF PORT, FL 33707 MESSERER, JEREMY & PATRICIA 463 OAK CREEK DR S VADNAIS HEIGHTS, MN 55127-7017 BORDERS, DIANA ANN 6316 SHADOWOOD CIR NAPLES, FL 341124909 KLING JR, RONALD S & STACY S 6238 SHADOWOOD CIRCLE #2204 NAPLES, FL 34112 ROZIO, IRENA 6275 SHADOWOOD CIR # 2303 NAPLES, FL 34112 com/patents � �tlquettes d"adresse Easy Peel® � Pat'averYI Repllez�fahachureaflnderbv�lerlarebordFrop-up° I Allez � averyca/gabarits � Utlllsez le GabaritAvery 5160 I mm 5160® COLLEGE PARK HOLDINGS LTD 477 S ROSEMARY AVE #301 WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401 CAMILA LLC 3070 FOLLY AVE NAPLES, FL 34112-2726 r I COLLIER CNTY C/0 REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112 DEONARINE, KELVIN 3764 KENT DR NAPLES, FL 34112-3740 ALBERT L CANFIELD REV TRUST 6298 PARKERS HAMMOCK RD NAPLES, FL 34112-2990 SANCHEZ, JUAN & MARLENE C 4165 FOLLY AVE NAPLES, FL 34112-2943 BUCKLEY JR, ROBIN D & SUSAN O 6378 ADKINS AVE NAPLES, FL 34112-2952 Easy Peel&Address Lanels Bend along line to expose Pop-up Edg& WING SOUTH INC 4130 SKYWAY DR MAPLES, FL 34112 INSPIRA DEVELOPMENT LLC 2639 PROFESSIONAL CIR # 101 MAPLES, FL 34119 SPINATTO, DOSE L & HELENA B 3050 SANDY LANE MAPLES, FL 34112 LELY RESORT MASTER PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION INC 2639 PROFESSIONAL CIR #101 NAPLES, FL 34119 NAPLES HERITAGE GOLF & COUNTRY CLUB INC 8150 HERITAGE CLUB WAY NAPLES, FL 34112-7703 SOTO, NANCY J 6211 HANSEN RD NAPLES, FL 34112-2988 ALCINE, ELSON LI DEJA SAG ESSE 3381 POLLY AVE NAPLES, FL 34112-2942 MURPHY, MORGAN 6293 ADKINS AVE NAPLES, FL 34112-2987 ANDES HOLDINGS LLC 2055 TRADE CENTER WAY NAPLES, FL 34109 �o to avery.com/templates i UseAveryTemplate 5160 I STOCK DEVELOPMENT LLC 2639 PROFESSIONAL CIR #101 MAPLES, FL 34119 GONZALEZ, JUAN MANUEL 5515 HARDEE STREET MAPLES, FL 34113 SCHOESSEL, JUSTIN 6100 ADKINS AVE MAPLES, FL 34112 HECK, WILLIAM B 3060 FOLLY AVE NAPLES, FL 34112-2726 WITTEN, PAUL & ELAINE 6234 PARKERS HAMMOCK RD NAPLES, FL 34112 ROGERS, LYNN D 6251 WHITAKER RD NAPLES, FL 34112-2986 MCS LLC 781 6TH STREET SE NAPLES, FL 34117 DIPALMA, FRANCIS J PATRICK M BREWER 6350 PARKERS HAMMOCK ROAD NAPLES, FL 34112 Pat: averycom/paterrts ; �tiquettes d'adresse Easy Peelm � AlleZ 6 averyp/gabarits � 1 Repl lez � Ia hachure atliz de r�vr3%r le rebord Pop-upm I Utlllsez le Gabarlt Avery 5160 I ,�►v��y� 5160® ANDES HOLDINGS LLC 2055 TRADE CENTER WAY MAPLES, FL 34109 COLLIER CNN C/0 REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 T�rM IAM I TR E, STE 101 MAPLES, FL 34112 ZANECKI, RICHARD D 6351 PARKERS HAMMOCK RD MAPLES, FL 34112 SANTANA, MAYRA 3411 POLLY AVE MAPLES, FL 34112-2942 WITTEN, PAUL E & ELAINE M 6229 PARKERS HAMMOCK RD MAPLES, FL 34112-2940 TROEDEL, MARK 3150 POLLY AVE MAPLES, FL 34112-2753 WITTEN, JESSE WILLIAM 6228 PARKERS HAMMOCK RD MAPLES, FL 34112-2992 HERNANDEZ, ANGEL J & RAQUEL 6199 WHITAKER RD MAPLES, FL 34112-2967 BOOTHBY, HERBERT A &SUZANNE M 6335 PARKERS HAMMOCK RD MAPLES, FL 34112-2989 ORSCHELL, KEITH &SUZANNE 6266 ADKINS AVE MAPLES, FL 34112-2952 tasy tjeei� Aaaress tanels Bend along Ilne to expose Pop-up Edgem a CHARLES D COLVIN LIVING TRUST 6242 ADKINS AVE MAPLES, FL 34112-2952 CYPRESS LANDINGS II OF MAPLES LLC 2150 GOODLETTE RD N 6th FI MAPLES, FL 34102 BRYSON, JENNIFER 3660 POLLY AVE MAPLES, FL 34112 NELSON, THOMAS G & JANET M 4002 BRUSH LN MAPLES, FL 34112 HIGGINS, DAVID A MONICA D HIGGINS 6215 PARKERS HAMMOCK RD MAPLES, FL 34112-2940 POOLE JR, JAMES E & FILOMENA A 3100 POLLY AVE MAPLES, FL 34112-2753 WILD, JOHN D 6329 PARKERS HAMMOCK RD MAPLES, FL 34112-2989 TOSCANI, CARLA C 6334 PARKERS HAMMOCK ROAD MAPLES, FL 34112 SCHOOLEY, JASON P 3323 POLLY AVE MAPLES, FL 34112 ELPETHA REALTY OF FORT LAUDERDALE INC 261 SEMINOLE CT MARCO ISLAND, FL 34145-4117 coo to avery.com/templates � Use AveryTemplata 5160 1 STOCK DEVELOPMENT LLC 2639 PROFESSIONAL CIR #101 MAPLES, FL 34119 WILSON, JOHNS & MELANIE D 6222 PARKERS HAMMOCK RD MAPLES, FL 34112-2992 HERNANDEZ, ANGEL NORBERTO HERNANDEZ 5210 FLEMING ST MAPLES, FL 34113 WITTEN, PAUL E & ELAINE M 6229 PARKERS HAMMOCK RD MAPLES, FL 34112-2940 S D CORP OF MAPLES INC 9132 STRADA PL 4TH FL MAPLES, FL 34108-2942 CONDOM, KEVIN 6207 HANSEN RD MAPLES, FL 34112-2988 SPARACINO, CHRISTOPHER GALINA SPARACINO 6368 ADKINS AVE MAPLES, FL 34112-2952 JAYNE, MELISSA 6267 WHITAKER RD MAPLES, FL 34112-2986 Pat: averycom/petents � Etlquettes d'adresse Easy Peel® � Replioz � la hachure afln de r8v�ler le rebord Pop•upm 1 Allen fi averyca/gabarits Utllisez le Gabarlt Avery 5160 I 4 41 e 1 1 tasy reei� Aciaress Lapels Bend along line to expose Pop-up Edge® i 1 Soto averymm/templates ; Use Avery Template 5160 1 MASH EST, GEINEVA 5234 WHITAKER RD NAPLES, FL 34112-2966 WI"LIV, PAUL & ELAINE 6229 PARKERS HAMMOCK RD MAPLES, FL 34112-2940 PROVOST, AIVDREW S & JACYLN M 6214 PARKERS HAMMOCK RD MAPLES, FL 34112-2992 Pat; averycom/patents ; �tiquettes d'adresse Easy Peel® N 1 ReplleZ � la hachure afln de r�v6ler to rebord Pop•upm 1 Aifez � avery.ca/gabarits � Utllisez 1e Gabarit Avery 5160 1 51600 V 1 I tasy reel Aaaress lapels vo to avery.com/templates � Bend along line to expose Pop-up EdgO Use Avery Template 5160 1 NAPLES CLUB ESTATES HOMEOWNERS'S ASSOCIATION INC 5515 BR`(Se)N DR STE 502 NAPLES, FL'3/1109 SEMPLE, DORIS BRIAN STRATYCHUK 10291 BREWSTER BLVD S. GRAND BEND NOM 1T0 ONTARIO, CANADA EGGER, WILHELM & EDELTRAUD ULAUSEN 6:A FEIDKIRCHEN 9560 AUSTRIA mot; �,,��p�m, ; �tiquettes d'adresse Easy Peel® � I Repllez � la hachure afln sta rbv6ler le rebord Pop-upm t Allen fi avery.ca/gabarits � UNllsez le Gabarlt Avery 5160 1 Neighborhood Informational Meeting SD Corporation of Naples, Inc. PUD Amendment Petition PL 20190000259 Neighborhood Informational Meeting Tuesday May 7, 2019 at 5:30 PM At Mayflower Congregational Church of Christ Name JCAP cL 4 / t.Aw� Address KeitYZ 6 2'7 �G9'Cr� e, c c� i q 5tc t-, Email Address &A Olafflog N l i !-. ow ss ' L ra5 l� snal,W 1 2/2 c i7 x C'�ar Es r v►c► 3 Af)v: ! c s A Ye [�~n_S ��e 1�r3 -�![le clz e Ei j� C,7�. r A hn j co ry Iv i L + Proposed Ingress/Egrrss BD at SDP/PPL) Fully Ave. Lf:t� Y41 „ YIAti 1-t,!_=— Old M(ILII 4AMILY RESIUENIIA� 'SINGLE -hAWLY kES1UEWTJAL i.-h} Cl [ ' nl, 1- NRIVA(E AIR PARK UI�TRt(:r IlIhAI AU LWIVt S Ul I1,1-.1 Ilid It .. t1:?IL lHl`i 1:7:HIB11 Wti� V�rCRf 1fFD f=f2i1M IHE I_)I�I(-•Ih!r�l :Ill+.11�ll I ''I I! 'vl,\'.:>IEN, i'U1fV l:i\NF_hUL /;1 fEIVTIOf`i WA5 I�;'till.l I�_! Is^II•!I!91_:C JIJIIJ I t.IJ f l(?fVAL kE �'ISIUI1Zj I HE OIJL.'r' IIV I EIJUtL) 1_ 1 091'gk L _; •\I<l I I, ", i'J 5I'I�II� E THROU'�H /UNDL HLIRIF FORMAL IN I I-Il Iv1I,9 �l� r I •'Iil 1 ! ' Wl l f I c'401_ NUTAH)" CHAIAGE 10 MA(T, 0,� r ' (j, (iRAUY IviINOK &ASSOCIATES, P.A. l 11'Il. I'.t.Ih Ll:k! • 1,1111 N'N\ L1UN1 • I'ln�\1 N� • L,\I/v ,I'I.,1N(Illlrl I S !rl\II,]I'MI\�\ • „M, III i.. • Mu11111W1 4 %4 114 P UU MASTER PLAN "' , . UAVI� dLVU it m k v: SHm.OUW VWOD PULE WHITAKER F2UAD •HII".t"I.o^u L//////////jf PROJECT LOCATION I i J J CL a VULt AVE I EVERErrsr LL W -I Li V I I hAl IL�7,/Knt rlhGltd..C� HGFU NOlil H 2y Ile tF C s� U bUU IUUU IUUU I Rev Loco Mop.dwq, Apr 29a- 2019, 2: 23prKi st_ALL IN I ct I REVISIONS HAGAN PREPARED FOR: LOCATION MAN E N U 1 N It E R 1 N U SD CORPORATION OF NAPLES, INC_ 1250 TAMIAMI TRAIL NORTH, STE 203B Naples, Florida 34102 DATE PROJECT N0. SCALE SHEET Phone (239) 851-9239 04/29/19 201 8-217 As Shown 1 OF 1 Shadow Wood - Neighborhood Informational Meeting #1 May 7, 2019 BILL BARYON [00:00:00] Why don't we begin. Let me introduce myself. I'm in Barton. And I'm. Here representing the property owner in this. Neighborhood Informational Meeting. With me tonight also is Mr. Clyde Quimby who is the registered agent for the property owner and Mr. Chris Hagan. Chris is the engineer for the property owner that is responsible for putting most of the documentation together to carry this through the process. UNID WOMAN [00:00:27] Who is the prperty owner? BILL BARYON [00:00:27} SD Corporation. And also with us tonight we have Mr. Tim Finn and Mr. Gil Rodriguez both of these gentlemen are. Planners senior planners with the. With Collier County. So they'll be available for. Questions of. If they're. Appropriate one to answer the questions. Let me start by just. Pointing out that in the handout that you all have I know they're a little bit difficult. To see but. They are precisely what we're looking at here. We just reduced them so that you could have them in your hand and take them home with you and I'm going to turn this exhibit so that they're both oriented in the same direction. The property that we're dealing with tonight. Is Tract E of Shadow Wood. Which is this property outlined Right here. Shadow Wood is all of the PUD that is shown in the outline Right there. And this PUD, to give you a little history on it. This PD was originally approved by Collier County in 1982. So. Keep in mind that in 1982 there was no Santa Barbara. Boulevard didn't exist. So at the time there was no availability for having any or showing any access to the west. Of this problem. And then initially it was going to go off south of. Rattlesnake Hammock Road. You also. See. Most of the most and you're probably aware of. Right here is very far south. That's an existing development and it uses this.' Runway right here to build the sourhern tract Where Park side was not part of the shadow wood development. That's a separate development. UNID MAN [00:02:21] -That was at one time wasn't it. There was an old one atone time. BILL BARYON [00:02:24] at one time. And. As you may recall right now. There Park side was a gated community. The Development was designed for. Single family homes and there to actually have. Their own. Garages for airplanes. And those airplanes actually use the road system. As a taxi way to get back and forth to their property from the runway. So that's a little history of what we're dealing with. Our purpose tonight is very simple. It is simply to. Get this property. So that it is in compliance with. Collier county's land development code. That's the whole purpose of our being here. And. We thought that that. Would just be automatic. But the County said no we have to go through what's called the PDI. Which is a insubstantial. Revision to an existing PUD. So that's what we're here tonight to do is. Move forward in that process of PDI. What we're looking for is. Access from this property. To these three. existing County private roadways. That's Whitaker Road, Atkins Avenue, and Polly Avenue and the. Growth Management Plan has probably four different sections to it. That deals with this. That mandates. That we. Have those in place. I'm going to read the one that is most. Appropriate and is most applicable to this. Event. And that's the transportation element. Of Collier County's land development code which is. Policy number nine point three. And incidentally I've got copies of these and I'll be happy for you to. Take home with you. Like I'm going to read this particular one. And it reads as follows the county shall require wherever feasible the interconnection of local streets between developments to facilitate convenient movement throughout the road network. The LDC that's the land development code. Shall identify the circumstances and conditions that would require the interconnection of neighboring developments and shall also develop standards and criteria for the safe interconnection of such local streets. We are here tonight because the county has told us. We need to have those. Local road connections. And that's our whole purpose of being here tonight. And. As 1. Mentioned there's. Three other elements in the land development code that deal with this but all won't take the time to read those but I do have copies if you all want to take home. The current status of the property the property is the current owners who are not developers. They have no intent to develop the property. So at some point in time when it's appropriate. For them. They will put that. Property on the market. And. Someone. Will buy it and likely develop. As a consequence we're totally unable to provide you any information on. Such things as density. The property is zoned. For residential. There's no commercial no industrial zoning and. So it will be residential but it can be either a single family or multifamily. But right now we can't tell you. What it's going to be. How dense it's going to be. Or. Whether its going to be single family or multifamily whether it's going to be a mix of the two. We just don't have any. Answers for you tonight. That can help with that. So that's the basically what we're here for. That's. The reason we're here. And. To make you aware of what's going on in your particular neighborhood. Unless. That's really all I have what I'd like to do now is just open it up for questions and. Those of you that do have questions I'd appreciate it if you'd state your name address for the record so that the county if. To have. Knowledge of that. Yes sir. 6216 SHADOW WOOD [00:06:51 ] Shadow Wood Villas 6216 Shadow Wood Circle. All the access you're talking about is to the west out to Santa Barbara. BILL BARYON [00:06:59] That's correct. 6216 SHADOW WOOD [00:06:59] It doesn't go to the south? BILL BARYON [00:07:01 ] That's correct. 6216 SHADOW WOOD [00:07:01] Through Rattlesnake Hammock? BILL BARYON [00:07:02] That's correct. 6216 SHADOW WOOD [00:07:03] Thank you. BILL BARYON [00:07:06] -Yes sir. ADAM FOLEY [00:07:07] Adam Foley 4144 Skyway Drive. The first point would be on that picture there Atkins Avenue is further south that what is shown. It's actually at the bottom corner. BILL BARYON [00:07:19] That's not right no it's not correct. ADAM FOLEY [00:07:25] That. Yellow drawing on the other side is correct. BILL BARYON [00:07:33] You're right. Atkins Avenue is right there. UNID MAN [00:07:36] Alright. So. That's where the road goes into. ADAM FOLEY [00:07:40] So that's the point I like to bring up is. In. The. Wing South private village which 6s that housing. That you share housing development. Is pretty much built out. All the way and that northwest corner. And with the recent LASIP project with the canals and drainage. From the. From. Our development. To the street is nothing but open grass and some canal. So if a. Driver would go in there. There's. Very little we can do in the way of street. Noise Abatement. Bushes and shrubs. So we would object to. Opening up that. drive way or thoroughfare. Thing. Apparently. The other two we have no objection to. BILL BARYON [00:08:17] OK. That's. You've now made that. Known. And it will go forward to the hearing officer that. You would. Prefer that it not happen. ADAM FOLEY [00:08:28] OK Thank you. BILL BARYON [00:08:30] Yes sir. UNID MAN [00:08:32] - 84 Skyway Drive. There at Tract E at Wing South. The other question that I would have. Excuse me I have a very heavy chest. Is reference to the east line that runs north south adjacent to the north end of the runway. Whenever a development is there and you say it could be multi -family or single family or whatever. There have to be consideration of the height of the multifamily. Because of FAA requirements for encroachment to the Runway. Satellite or safety. That certainly has to be part of the plan. At that time. BILL BARYON [00:09:12] Let me let me spend a momen# on that with. With you all. For this project to move forward. At this point in time when a development is proposed by. A future owner. One of the things they will have to go through with Collier County as a site development plan. That will. At that point time all of you will have an opportunity to once again be involved. And there will be public hearings on that. That would be the time for you to be involved and make those kinds of concerns known. Yes sir. ROBERT BUCKLEY [00:09:47] Robert Buckley 6370 Atkins Avenue. I'm actually on the end of Atkins and that is my property goes up against that property. And LASIP came in and they took the right of way in the front. From that property. And I can't see at this point how. Because. There was no right of way there. Unless the county were to give up LASIP or build a bridge over that canal. I'm not sure. How you're possibly going to enter that property now we're streaming loans going up in a corner like this gentleman's concerns. That you literally have a river going 15 feet from these. People and just build a new home right there. So and we're on a dead end and we've been told by the county numerous times during this for 25 years that we paid to have the road paved that it is a private road. And. So of course we object to it and I'd like you to put that on the record. BILL BARYON [00:10:43] Well I'm not sure who told you it was a private road but that's incorrect. ROBERT BUCKLEY [00:10:46] Every time we called the road department and ask them to fix it they say it's private. Any time we want something done here. That's private. Yeah. Only seems to be private when you want something done and other than that. BILL BARYON [00:10:56] I understand that same condition as you all may know exists and in Golden Gate Estates all over the place. They're all public roads. ROBERT BUCKLEY [00:11:04] Don't get me wrong we don't think it's private, I'm just telling you what we're told every time every time we have a pothole or anything. In fact tI ey should tore up that road and all we can do and all the neighbors together to have a fixed one section and then our section in front of all us they just left. They said it's not bad enough. So that's what we go through. But the main thing is if somebody were to stand there and look and I know the surveyor was out and I let him go through my property. This has been ongoing now for years. I know Mr. Buckle personally and have talked to him. Once they gave up that property down there because they also have part of the property in the south side. I think had to say now they seemed to have turned in to the grass Cypress something or other that other property in the south and tied into that. Now that canal is there then I can't see possibly unless you turn that down remove the right of way, Which you all took they didn't have any compensation for me because it was deer right away 30 feet in front they just change out my fence and the other side of me is the ditch and I want to go well I saw that property. Going north. So I just don't see you have to come down on Atkins which is we're all four single family homes. Two and a half 5 acre parcels parcels. How are you going to get into that property. Unless you the County gives them back the property and run a big culvert and bridge and then you will probably these people in Shadow Lawn or Shadow Wood not Shadow Wodd the airport property over there. With all these new homes built up down nto Wing South and disrupt them. So again I'm just pointing out my objections and I think what you'll hear from my neighbors were all pretty well against it. BILL BARYON [00:12:49] And I understand that their connections through Atkins will certainly be problematic. I understand that. Yes sir. KEITH ROCHELLE [00:12:57] My name is Keith O'Shea 6266 Atkins Avenue. And. I moved down there in 1963 started building my home. Those were nothing but. Dirt roads we petitioned the County to get them paved. And they wouldn't do it. So they said, By the way. You could collect money. From all your neighbors. And. Collect it and give it to us and will pave the road for you. I said great. So three of us went door to door. Asking everybody in the neighborhood. Put up the money to pay that. That was the only paved road out there. Everybody used. Whitaker Polly and they all came out the one paved road. Now you're telling me that that road belongs to the county. BILL BARYON [00:13:52] I'm telling you that the Right of way does. KEITH ROCHELLE [00:13:54] Why is it better. Why is it that any of those roads touching that property going north to Daivs. There's no other communities that have roads that go out to Davis. And why isn't it going out there. BILL BARYON [00:14:10] Because several reasons, those roads don't come to these property lines. KEITH ROCHELLE [00:14:15] I'm talking this way I'm talking about north to Davis. That's not how we want to be going that way. BILL BARYON [00:14:24] I don't know of any of those roads that dead end into this property. KEITH ROCHELLE [00:14:30] Oh it has a dead end. Well I didn't get that one. BILL BARYON [00:14:33] I think there is quite a bit of private property. Between the road in this location. KEITH ROCHELLE [00:14:38] That is. That some sort of estates. This. Property. Is not some sort of estates. So why are you tying back . Into our property. Into our communiy. Just a question. Just because it all dead ends some of what you're talking about don't even dead end. BILL BARYON [00:14:56] What I'm saying. Is when I say dead end what I'm saying is the The. Right of way. of These. Roads. Abutt This is property line. To the north. They would not.. Yes. Ma'am, SUZANNE ROCHELLE [00:15:29] Suzanne Rachelfe 6266 Atkins Avenue I'm the other half of him (Keith). I've got a few questions about. Your letter sir. dated February 13th Just kind of a not a clarification just to reaffirm what you said. In that. Because of the LASIP canal. There 70 feet of the northern, southern, and eastern boundaries of tract E. And those physical emcumberances will limit the opportunity. For the. Vehicular connection. From the private villas. I guess in tract E. up to Atkins. So I'm hoping. That it will be difficult enough. To try to swing around the canal and to get down Atkins. That's one of the kind of thing I wanted to. Reiterate. The other. in this says. After meeting with Mike Bosse. I think. Perhaps you met with Mr. Bosse on the 18th. It was just. Determined that access to. tract E. Must be provided not only from the south. So. Are you throwing out. The South? So. Absolutely no rattlesnake hammock road? Even though on this letter. It was kind of, discussed back in February? BILL BARYON [00:16:38] Well. This. This property. South. Of. There at Wing South. Those properties. do have roadways that touch here. But this is now a. Gated community with airplanes using the roadways. That's. Something. That. has been that way. It. for a long time. But in terms of. Development here. We're going through a road system that shares. The road with airplanes. That's not going to happen. Be it right wrong or indifferent. The folks that bought property in there in those homes. They have a vested right to use those roads for their airplanes. That's. That's just the way it is. So. That's. Really problematic. Yes. ROBERT BUCKLEY [00:17:37] Wefl. I have a problem with the map a little bit. Not to open up another can of worms. But I know if you move Atkins south SD development owns 7.5 acres across the street from me. And that's not on there. That was originally part of the PUD for the airport. So where is that on the map. BILL BARYON [00:17:59] Well what we've showing on the map. ROBERT BUCKLEY [00:18:00] That's where the septic tank was at the airport people all had removed. You don't see that on the map. It's not on there. BILL BARYON [00:18:07] It's my understanding that shadow wood development is what is shown on the map. Chris is that incorrect? CHRIS HAGAN [00:18:13] No you are correct Bill. And the former sewage treatment plant is within the tract a up there it is. We had it. ROBERT BUCKLEY [00:18:25] if it is lower the sewage plant was to the south of me. So you tel! me where it CHRIS HAGAN [00:18:36] The sewage plant is right in this area here. ROBERT BUCKLEY [00:18:37] It can't be if Atkins is right there it's not even close CHRIS HAGAN [00 18:41 ] That's where the Phase 1 environmental audit showed it being ROBERT BUCKLEY [00:18:48] I'm sorry sir, but if Atkins is down below where it should be it's to the south of that. It's been there for years. AUDIENCE [00:18:57] Would you like us to show you where it is? CHRIS HAGAN [00:19:02] Please guys one at a time and announce yourself. Let's try and keep it that way because this is gonna have to get transcribed. And if you want the record to accurately reflect what you've said you need to cooperate a little bit. All right. Yeah. I don't want to be mom but here we go. ADAM FOLEY [00:19:21 ] Yes sir, Adam Olney 4144 Skyway Drive. The sewer building was as you mentioned south of tract E. But it was demolished about eight months ago and it's no longer there. It's clean dirt now. ROBERT BUCKLEY [00:19:34] Bob Buckley 6370 Atkins but the property is still there. That's 7.5 acres which now ties into the property south of there that SD development has bought. ADAM FOLEY [00:19:44] Their separate properties. They're both owned by the same company, but they're separate properties. ROBERT BUCKLEY [00:19:49] Where the sewage plant was that used to service the air park. You're telling me that's was not ever part of the air park property even though a sewage plant was on it. ADAM FOLEY [00:19:58j In the past it's been broken up since then ROBERT BUCKLEY [00:20:01 ] Well the rest of this has been broken up too. That's what I'm saying it should show on that now. That that piece exists. BILL BARYON [00:20:11 ] Well I have to confess ignorance on the location of the sewage � plant but I can tell you this. That the sewage plant mayor may not have been on the property that it served. There's nothing that states that has to be on the same property it serves it can be offsite as many of them are. Yes sir. UNID MAN [00:20:34] One other question I had was a letter that was sent out. That Fewer than twelve people and Wing South received. We have over fifty five units there and there were fewer than twelve who received this. BILL BARYON [00:20:48] That's a good point. UNID MAN [00:20:50] The question I have is this. In that letter that you sent out to 4 percent of residents and specifically calls for the prior approval of the PUD in 1982 restricted vehicular access. To rattlesnake hammock road only. So it appears that you're talking about an east west entry into that property on the board. But this PUD restriction was a restriction to the south. So in effect if that restriction is lifted will there be another access road to rattlesnake hammock from your property to the north. BILL BARYON [00:21:24] All right let let me take this from the order I've got an item that 1 added to my discussion points just today. Because we learned that the County did not give us a complete list of the property owners. They left fifty nine property owners off of the list and as a consequence. The property owner is going to have to go through this same process. Again. We're going to have to mail out. You're going to get another letter telling you about another NIM. Right now we think it's going to be on the twenty eighth of this month but we're not certain of that yet. So be aware that when you get another letter you'll understand why. And that's because 59 people were left off the list and those are I'm sure part of the ones that were left off the list. UNID MAN [00:22:16] In relationship with that comment. We have many wintertime people who live here only most of them are gone already. We don't know whether or not. If the county has their northern address. They may or may not be getting their mail here or there. I have no idea. I'm associated tract E at the moment we only have a letter box there. But. Most of those people have already gone back north. They wouldn't be. They wouldn't even have a clue of what was going on unless we had received one of these letters and sent it to them. BILL BARYON [00:22:51 ] I hear what you're saying. I'm not sure how to respond to that. That is what it is. With regard to the. Part of the original PUD that you quoted that is a part of this process. That. That line item in that PUD will be eliminated. Yes sir. CLARK GREEN [00:23:14] I'm Clark Green at 6184 Booth Road. When was the Park made a gated community? What year? Where they parked there? BILL BARYON [00:23:23] I don't know the answer to that, Tim do you know the answer? CLARK GREEN [00:23:26] Was it before 2008? TIRA FINN [00:23:27] I don't know the answer to that. CLARK GREEN [00:23:27] CLARK -Well it was. And in 2008 you redid the PUD and even then that acknowledged that access was to rattlesnake hammock only. So I don't know you kind of have a paradox here. And your PUD. You have access to rattlesnak hammock only. But somehow sometime you cordon off the middle of it, and made a gated community out of it. To inhibit the south access to your northern tract. So I don't know how the world has gotten that approved in the County in the first place. You really dropped the ball on that. Because you just renigged on the 1982 and the 2008 updated of the PUD by approving that. BILL BARYON [00:24:17] et me make the point that you're referring To the issue as we, we didn't develop airport south. I don't know how it got approved either but it got approved. We didn't do it. Somebody did it. ;LARK GREEN [00:24:30] Well that was a mistake and now we're paying the cost of that mistake. By mandating access to. The west on Whitaker Road It's not going to be Atkins it's going to be Whitaker Road. And that shouldn't be either. The only reason you guys are doing this now because the county paved Whitaker Road last December. You had ample opportunity to request this ingress egress any time in the last 30 some years off of Whitaker Road, but you would have had to pay for it if you did that. Now that the County did this and tax payers for the benefit of the residents and property owners of sunset estates. Not for SD corp's benefit. They got Witaker Road paved and got it in the limerock improvement project. Just like the roads in Golden Gate Estates and as soon as they did that last August it shot up to number one to be paved and there's more traffic on that road than any other road. In the limerock improvement project roadways. And the cost of the county is more than any other per mile cost in the county. When I talked to Travis Gosser about it before he retired last December. We've been working on this for 10 years to get anything paved back in there, I know that a lot of people decades before me that has done the same thing. And the people on Atkins get the shaft because they paidy for it themselves. And now you're serving their rights too. Or at least trying to but that's never going to happen and you know that. It's gonna be Whitaker Road. Well. There's a lot to deal with there and I'm gonna shut up for a little bit. I'll come back in a little bit later. ROBERT BUCKLEY [00:26:02] By the way we're happy to wrote that. BERNADEEN HARRIS [00:26:10] Bernadeen Harris 6142 Atkins Avenue. I wanted to know about the utilities and how you getting utilities in here. BILL BARYON [00:26:18] You're asking a question that the ultimate owner and developer of the property will have to answer. And I couldn't give you a clue. I have no earthly idea. JEFF PRANCE [00:26:28] I mean you gotta get utility to that property. BILL BARYON [00:26:31 ] Yes they do. JEFF PRANCE [00:26:36] I mean, Atkins Avenue is not big enough to put a utility easement. BILL BARYON [00:26:40] That will be a part of the boxes that have to be checked by whoever intends to develop the property. Yes ma'am. BERNADEEN HARRIS [00:2649] And then also this gentlemen was talking about the paving of Whitaker Road are you planning on paving Polly Road? BILL BARYON [00:26:54] You keep asking me questions that I can't answer. Because we're not part of the development. I cannot give you any information on how the property is going to be developed how the utilities are going to get there which roads are going to get paved. I just don't have any answers. Yes. Sir. MICHAEL IVES [00:27:15] Michael Ives from 6273 shadow wood. As I listen here it sounds like you had a lot of information but no answers. I'm just wondering how far in advance are you looking that it this could ever be built on. What do you what do you think? BILL BARYON [00:27:33] I'm not sure I understand the question. MICHAEL IVES [00:27:36] You have a development going in there somebody wants to do it. Plan B is at it property at the North End right there. What is the game plan for how far in advance do you think that would need to be putting homes in there? BILL BARYON [00:27:53] I have no idea. I can tell you I can tell you that. Just to go through the process. Of permitting. Both. Local. And state. and likely federal. It would really surprised me if any development could be started in less than three years. MICHAEL IVES [00:28:17] Well that's what I was going to ask. Obviously you're in a position that somebody wants to develop property and you're the realtor? BILL BARYON [00:28:26] No I'm not the realtor the realtor is sitting right there. MICHAEL IVES [00:28:28] Okay so he's the realtor so somebody is coming up with a game plan. Here we have this property what can we do with it. That's what I was wondering how far in advance are we talking? Maybe two three four years before anything gets developed. I might be dead by then so I don't know. BERNADEEN HARRIS [00:28:44] But Let's hope not. JEFF PRANCE [00:28:47] Jeff France 6 1 4 2 Adkins. To follow up on his question What keyed you to start this talk? Clyde Quinby is sitting here and he's a realtor does he wants to sell the property? Is there something that that you guys know that we don't? Is the property for sale? You're saying that property is not for sale. BILL BARYON [00:29:10] The property is not for sale. JEFF PRANCE [00:29:10J But the owners oh they just thought Oh we're gonna just go ahead and see if we get some roads into this property we might want to sell. BILL BARYON [00:29:17] Well actually. JEFF PRANCE [00:29:18] Come on BILL BARYON [00:29:18] We went to the, the property owner went to the county and said tMCI e are three public rights of way that abutt our property. We have aright to use those. BILL BARYON [00:00:02] Do you agree or disagree with that? The county and I'm paraphrasing basically said not only do you have a right to use them we're going to insist that you do because that's part of the land development code. We are here because we went thinking we didn't have to do anything. JEFF PRANCE [00:00:19] You got to get a road your property. BILL BARYON 100:00;21 ] Yes and there are three roads right there. and this property owner. Thought then and and continues to think. That those are public roads and the property owner has a right to use them. JEFF PRANCE [00:00:34] You do have a right to get there somehow whether its easements or theres right of ways. Theres you can eminent domain whatever you got to do. But isn't it ironic that all this building is going on. And. We all aren't foolish we know that that's a hot piece of property or going to be.You can see things are happening. So everybody's moving to do that and that would be nice if we just say hey we know is going to go here sono we don't know. BILL BARYON [00:00:59] I'm not sure it is. JEFF PRANCE [00:01:00] Yeah. BILL BARYON [00:01:00] Well 1'm not trying to suggest that it's not going to happen. JEFF FRANCE [00:01 03] Right but it isn't like we're oh well we weren't we're out for a stroll one day and we said we're thinking that they to use those roads you know. BILL BARYON [00:01:10] If I conveyed it that way. It's incorrect. JEFF FRANCE [00:01:12] Yeah_ BILL BARTON [00:01:13] This is obviously a step to make the property more attractive for development purposes. That's obvious. JEFF FRANCE [00:01:21 ] Yeah. BILL BARYON [00:01:22] Yes sir. UNID MAN [00:01:25] I want to take issue about the County saying we're supposed to do it this way. Mark Strain is the head planner on that and he's kind of the big guy right? BILL BARYON [00:01:35] Mark the hearing officer, yes. UNID MAN [00:01:37] Right. There is an issue with Sunset Boulevard being extended to Tamara Preserve through Russell Square. The new development that came out of in the Russell Square PUD permitting process. Because in the Tamara PUD they approved Sunset going all the way to Tamara. Russell Square had about four parcels five acre parcels about 1200 feet. They want to ending at sunset. And not give access to Tamara through Russell Square. All this came out of the hearing I wrote Mark an email saying that this would be a bad precedent if they allowed Sunse to go through Russell Square to access Tamara because it changes the nature of Sunset. And also approving access to Tamara PUD using sunset sets a bad precedent. There was no plan at the east end of Whitaker Road that used to be part of the Wing South development. The developer purchased this property and request access as far as Whitaker Road. The Planning Commission would be legally obligated to grant this access due to the granting and access to the Tamara PUD via Sunset. Mark wrote back saying the requirement to dead end Sunset was accepted as proposed by Neil they are going to dead end Sunset. Russell Square there is not going to be any interconnect to with Colt Lane. Colt Lane is going to be the access to Russell Square. Anybody in Russell Square cannot exit south to Sunset that's a dead end. He said as the dead end sign said We do not approve any interconnection to the north as that would have been inconsistent with our code for some of the various reasons you stated. So it's not given that the county says you have to do this. Talk to Mark Strain and he'll say no you're not because Whitaker Road is a service road for Sunset Estates. Not for SD Corp. And any benefit SD Corp gets by having access to Whitaker Road is a detriment to the existing property owners in Sunset Estates. And Mark's Strain will agree to that. So go ahead and try to run this through there's going to be a lot of resistance to it. I'm one and I think I've got Mark on my side. So I don't believe it that it's a county rule somebody at the county said that but that's not all. BILL BARYON [00:03:50] Well we wouldn't be here today if we were not directed to be here today. Let me just say that again we would not be here today if the county had not directed us to be here today. UNID MAN [00:04:01 ]Well you have to your neighborhood information meeting to a PUD change BILL BARYON [00:04:03] We didn't think we didn't think we had to do a PDI but the County insisted that we did a PDI. UNID MAN (00:04:11] Yeah I want to address that too because in the insubstantial PUD amendment findings. The County wrote a letter to you then said well we'll make a substantial not insubstantial. All I see is that it says when an increase of impacts the development which may include but are not limited to increases in traffic generation. Changes and traffic circulation or impacts on. Other facilities. Whitaker Road. It's not going to do that because it's still 164 units like it always has been but it does impact Whitaker Road so this does make it a substantial PUD change. BILL BARYON [00:04:46] That's your decision. UNID MAN [00:04:48] That is my opinion. BILL BARYON [00:04:49] that was not the County's decision. UNID MAN (00:04:52] No that was your response to this and the County agreed to it, but don't think the end result they will agree to it. And also on point H a change will bring about a relationship to an abutting land Sunset Estates. Use that would be incompatible with an adjacent land use all of Sunset Estates is agricultural zoned. And 2.5 five acre parcels and it cannot be subdivided. Unless there is a rezoning effort made. This is not access to development of 160 o. 600 units. Which it will be because they've already approved seven units for Russell Square. They will approve 17 units to theatre on these 77 acres. They have to they're legally bound because they have already set the precedent. So it's gonna be 400 houses there it's not going be 168 and they're all going to use Whitaker Road as a single access point. Not a single car the way you're proposing is gonna go south they can't run through a gated community. So you know that's all double speak changing the original plan. BILL PAOTMI [00:06:00] What would you suggest? You own the property. What would you suggest? UNID MAN [00:06:06] You go straight south of Whitaker Road like there is no PUD, excuse me Rattlesnake Hammock Road like there is not PUD and 2008 revision statement. BILL BARYON [00:06:15] All right, well if there was a question in there I must have miseed it. UNID MAN [00:06:19] There wasn't that was a statement of my objection on various points and not even handling this as an insubstantial is incorrect it should be a substantial PUD change. BILL BARYON [00:06:30] Talk to these gentlemen over there. Yes, sir. KEVIN DAVIS [00:06:33] Kevin Davis 3930 Skyway Drive I think since it's a lot of talk about the original PUD exiting to the south that parcel that you spoke of before where the sewer plant was. That should be shown on your map. Because we're talking about heading south out of that northern parcel, but that parcel where the sewer plant isn't even shown there and some of you aren't even sure where the sewer plant was so. You think s on the north side. its not it's on the western side at the tip of the it: side of that horseshoe. That piece of property. At one time I don't know who owns it now I think the same owners it's a separate parcel. I don't know the details on it. But since we're talking about heading south. That should be shown on the map for discussion purposes. BILL BARYON [00:07:24] We'll take that. KEVIN DAVIS [00:07:26] Like I said I don't know who owns it now I don't even know. ADAM FOLEY [00:07:29] It's the same corporation. KEVIN DAVIS [00:07:29] So it's the same coporation so it's their property for consideration. BILL BARYON [00:07:36] OK Any other questions? Yes sir. MIKE LEE [00:07:41 ] Mike Lee 6120 Whitaker Road. Looking at your map here for Wing South air strip. I know at one time he heard. North of Whittaker they were going to do a road from Santa Barbara down all the way across out to Collier Boulevard at one time. Now I know that it goes through Naples Lakes now. I guess the right of way wasn't established. But there surely should be some kind of right of way to the east of the airstrip. And there should be some kind of the right of way to the north of this piece of property and more at the end of the airstrip. Why couldn't that be utilized in making a due south. Because me living on Whitaker Road, Yes I love my new paved road but I can see it turning into a race track and the way the county designs roads when they designed Santa Barbara and four laned it you don't have a red light. All you have is a loop de loop that you gotta go a block up to the north and make a turn around and come back. If you're putting 400 or 300 or whatever units you're putting in this new development when the owner sells it to some developer. The amount of traffic on Whitaker Road by itself cannot handle in my opinion. BILL BARYON [00:09:12] Once again that will be something that will come up during the SDP process and I'm sure it will be analyzed. Yes ma'am. SUZANNE ROCHELLE [00:09:20] Suzanne. Rochelle 6266 Atkins Avenue. Is there any chance that this tract a butts up against the Serenity Park?. BILL BARYON [00:09:28] I'm sorry I didn't understand. SUZANNE ROCHELLE [00:09:29] Is there any chance that this parcel will abbut Serenity park which exits out to 951 orCollier Boulevard? Because that would be a good out for everybody. That was a. I think it does but. [ 00:09:53] CROSSTALK. CHRIS HAGAN [00:09:56] Folks come on come on. I need to know who's speaking for the record. Otherwise if's gonna get lost. And your points are all important. Othenivise you wouldn't be speaking. Please. BILL BARYON [00:10:09] Any other questions? Yes sir. ROBERT BUCKLEY [00 10:1 1 ] Rob Buckley's 6378 Atkins Avenue I'm just curious, before the recession hit back to 2006. 1 even had discussions with Mr. Buckle joking about he could tie some property together by offering me a gazillion bucks to buy me out. And got a piece of paper from the Army Corps of Engineers that was doing a study that they had planned a development in there and I will have that paper to this day. But it showed where everything was going and next to me was going to be The pool and whatever you call it for the yeah for the townhouses and they had the whole thing laid out. So what happened to that and what ingress and egress were they going to use at that time. It had to exist because I know I got it and I haven't sent a response back to the Army Corps of Engineers. Because they were concerned about where the wetlands were in the area. So there were some kind of development discussed at that time and they had to have a plan for getting in and out. BILL BARYON [00:11:14] I personally can't answer it. ROBERT BUCKLEY [00:11:15] I know you can't personally do it but I'm just saying so the county can possibly look into that to find out what was happening then. BILL BARYON [00:11:23] I don't know ROBERT BUCKLEY [00:11:24] Because they weren't talking Whitaker which was a dirt road at the time LASIP so they had to have something. They weren't just going to bring people in by helicopter. BILL BARYON [00:11:38] Anything else? Yes sir. JEFF FRANCIS [00:11:41 ] Jeff Francis 6142 Atkins. You know you keep looking at this thing and keep listening to you guys and I just. More and more is unfolding is I think what's happening and now granted you've got a piece of property you've got to get to it. But I see what's happened is now they built around you and they're starting to pin you in real bad. And you're scrambling. So you need to go back and readdress, granted you got an airport on one side and a runway and you can't cut across that. You've got a airplanes driving south of you and you can't zigzag on airplanes. So we got a really good look at a shot to the west. With a bunch of neighborhood we can cut through. You need to definitely go back and look to the north. And if the if some of those people got to give a little everybody gives a little. Instead of taking a lot from us. So look to the north heavily. You know obviously we're on the site where we've got ways in to help you out but don't just pin us in there and say that's what we're going to do. I don't know, we don't see on there see you show this hokie map that's just showing us our three streets. You didn't show all around where there could be a possibility of maybe going to the north. Even if something had to be torn off or added into or this new development that's going all around you there to the north and to the northwest maybe now's the time before they start building and they're going to pin you in more. So I mean we know what's going on. Just approach it you know you're not you're not looking at at least one at least to the north you're not even showing that. You're. Kind to say now there's. No we can't do nothing there. Well you don't know. So you know we obviously got the airport on one side you've got an airport on actually two sides of you. So. It's the north and even west side that's available. And we just think we should spend more time looking to the north. BILL BARYON [00:13:46] Yes ma'am. SUZANNE ROCHELLE [00:13:46] Suzzane Rochelle O66 Atkins Avenue. I'm just curious because the map. That was for this particular project. Does show a LASIP conservation area bumping up again Shadow Wood, But I know it was said that the runway would have to go out into the Shado Wood tract e. Otherwise if it doesn't it should. Have some kind of access possibly to the east. And go through the LASIP conservation Area and something could be done. Well thank you and good luck with. BILL BARYON [00:14:17] The existing runway. SUZANNE ROCHELLE [00:14:20] So it's going to go into tract e then? BILL BARYON [00:14:20] No, tract e is bound by the east line right there. SUZANNE ROCHELLE [00:14:23] OK it didn't show up on this map. BILL BARYON [00:14:35] Any other questions? Thank you very much ladies and gentlemen we appreciate your input. CHRIS HAGAN [00:14:42] Anybody who didn't sign in please sign in the sheets are out front I'm turning off the camera. 4 AS,, at 1 NaplesNews,cI 'H tts Published Daily Naples, FL 3411.0 Affidavit of rubliication State of Florida Counties of Collier and Lee Before the undersigned they serve as the authority, serves as Inside Safes Manager of the Naples Daily News, a daily newspaper published personally appeared Natalie Zollar who on oath says that she Florida; distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida, that the attache said newspaper on dates fisted. Affiant further says that the said Naples p hed at Naples, in Collier Pub County, pies, in said Collier Caunty, Florida, and that the said news d CQN of the advertising was published in Collier County, Florida; distributed in Collier and lee counties p es Daily News is a newspaper Publishedledat Na said class mail matter ri the distributed office in Naples ins Raper has heretofore been dcontinuouslyhas p es of Florida, each day and has been ntene�d as secanrd the first publication of the attached co said Collier County, Florida, for a period of one year next promised any person, t corporation anyOfavertisement; and affiant further says that h preceding discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose neither they paid nor a vertisement for publication in the said newspaper Customer . o securing this HAGEN ENGINEERING Nq Number C po y ernf 2283451 114 page ad - please P•o•# Pub Dates May 13, 2019 (Sign ture of affiant) Sworn to and subscribed before me "MOW '=Kea k-9S � This May 13 . 7 Nab►y Pu5lk �a!e c(Fk�lda Y , 2019 ,_ ail Q IOn1nI�. WIrrl�etryAcra `., (� CI' Signat o arrant) 1 a trombone player in the mazchiirg band at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School. Alex was one of 17 people killed by a gunman at the school in February 2018. The instruments are engraved with a motif combining r11ex's name and a trombone. The money was raised ih part by other students playing music on street comers over the past few months. Tall grass floes lead Florida city to foreclose man's home DUNEDIN —It's true, a Florida man s ays his gras s grew a little too tall. But he doesn't think he should lose his house over it. The city of Dunedin moved to fore- close on the home of 69-yeaz-old Jim Ficken over $30,000 in unpaid code vio- lation fines. The Tampa Bay Times re- ports that Ficken was fined $500 a day last summer because his grass was tall- er than 10 inches. over;la.million - so far MIAMI -The Miami azea fought hard to land its llth Super Bowl eazly next year, but the big NI'L game cgmes at a price. The Miami Herald reports that county officials estimate they will spend $10 nuIlion on the game, as well as $4 million paid to the Miami Dol- phins as a bonus for hosting it at Hazd Rock Stadium. The $10 million for the Super Bowl itself includes game preparations, the costs of,deploying police officers and paramedics to Hazd Rock and to other events, and the expense of upgraded youth football fields slated to he part of the NFlis pregame goodwill blitz for Miami. Government officials say the cost is well worth it in free advertising for the region and more business for hotels, restaurants and nightclubs. -Associated Press across the city, according to the Na- tional Weather Service, which had warned of "life -threatening' flash flooding Saturday night into Sunday. The worst of the rain was moving into the Florida Panhandle, the weath- er:service said, but the city could ex- pect to he dealing with flooding issues for a while. NOLA.com reported that Il,500 New Orleans residents were �vithoutpower eazly Sunday. The eit}rwas trying to be proactive, encouraging residents to park on high ground and avoid driving -through flooded azeas. There's also 8 specific social rpedia account New Orleans res- idents can follow for suggestions on emergency preparedness. While dry weather is expectedto re- turn tothe region soon, flooding on the Mississippi River could 'get worse throughout the month. "River flooding may continue into June as floodwaters in rivers farther north travel southward and add onto Workers open bays of the Bonnet Carre Spillway on Friday. , G ERALD FIERBCR7/AF the ongoing flooding along the Lowe: Mississippi River," AccuWeather Mete orologist Brett Rathbun said, On Friday, the river rose so rapidly - six inches in 29 hours —that the Anne Corps of Engineers had to open the Bon net Cane splIlway, about ]2 miles wes of New Orleans; four days earlier that initially planned as a precautionar+ measure to relieve stress on the city' levees. At least half of New Orleans is at o below sea level and suffered catastroph is flooding during Hurricane Katrina v 2005. Contributing: The Associated Press Rapper Kodak Black arrested; Lit Wayne bows out of show Authorities say Black wIll make a initial appeazance in Miami feder< court Monday. Court records don't list. lawyer for -him: Most recently, Black was arreste last morrth on drug and weapon charges as he crossed from Canada int the U.S. near Niagara Falls, NewYork.I Florida, he has been chazged at differer times with drug and weapons posse: Sion, armed robbery, sexual assaul probation violations and fleeing fror officers. CuR Anderson ASSOCIATED PRE55 MIANII -The• Rolling Loud Music Festival celebrating global hip -hop art- ists in South Florida did not go so weIl for Kodak Black and Lil Wayrie. The U.S. Marshals Service said in a news release that Black was arrested Saturday at Hard Rock Stadium in Mi- ami Gardens. The statement said he was charged with a crime in connection with weapons, but didn't elaborate. Meanwhile, Lil Wayne said on social media that he refused to perform after being subjected to a search by security personnel or police. It wasnt immedi- ately cleaz Sunday who had done the pat -down on the rapper, whose real name is Dwayne Michael Carter Jr. But here's what he had to say on Twitter: "To all my fans who catrre to see me at Rolling Loud, I'm sorry but I won't be performing," the post says.' "The Festi- val Police (Not Rolling Loud) made it NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING Please be advised that S;D. Corporation of Naples, Inc. has submitted a PUD Amendment Petition PL20190000259 to Collier County to provide for access to the public roadway network for the previously approved the Shadowwood PUD. The Shadowwood Planned Unit Development (PUD) is located north of Rattlesnake Hammock Road and east of Santa Barbara Boulevard, generally lying east of the terminus of ��hitaker Road . and Adkins Avenue. The prior approval of the PUD in 1983 restricted vehicular access to Rattlesnake Hammock Road only. The County's jnterconnectivity requirements make these access restrictions illegal. The landowner/Petitioner is being required to add access locations to the PUD Master Plan and remove the restricted access language in the PUD Ordinance. e Project � Location .. b m c �' J C m 7 O � U O Rattlesnake Hammock RD V I The public is invited to attend a Neighborhood Information Meeting to be held on Tuesday, May 28, 2019 at 5:30 p.m, at the Mayflower Congregational United Church of Cluist, located at 2900 County Bam Rd, Naples, Florida 34112. This second meeting is required due to a County notice omission. If you are unable to attend this meeting btrt have questions or comments, they may be directed by mail, a -mail, or phone to the individuals listed• below. ' Clyde Quinby, Agent Clyde Quimby Realty 3785 Airport Road North ' Suite B Naples, Florida 34105 c.quinby@aol.com (239)261-1166 mandatory that I had to be policed and checked to get on the stadium _ grounds. I do not and will not ever settle for be'mg policed to do my job:' Black As for Kodak Black, whose current name is BID Kapri and who was born as Dieuson Octave to Haitian American parents in Florida, this arrest is the latest in a lengthy rap sheet he has assembled at the age of 2L L .. � AFFIDAVIT OF CUIVIPLIANCE I hereby certify that pursuant to Ordinance 2004-41, of the Collier County Land Development Code, I did cause the attached newspaper advertisement to appear and I did give notice by mail to the following property owners and/or condominium and civic associations whose members may be affected by the proposed land use changes of an application request for a rezoning, PUD amendment, or conditional use, at least 15 days prior to the scheduled Neighborhood Information Meeting. Tor the purposes of this requitement, the names and addresses of property owners shall be deemed those appearing on the latest tax rolls of Collier County and any other persons or entities who have made a formal request of the county to be notified? The said notice contained the laymen's description of the site property of proposed change and the date, time, and place of a Neighborhood Information Meeting. Per the attached letters, property owner's list, and copy of newspaper advertisement which are hereby made a part of this Affidavit of Compliance (Si State of rlorida County of Collier pplicant) The foregoing Affidavit of compliance was acknowledged before me this o� � � day of 2019 by known to me or who has produced, � (Signature of Notary Public) Printed Name of Notary G:1NIIvi Procedures/Affidavit Of Compliance - NINI Oct2010.Doc who is personally � ✓ , as identification. Earlene HooQer Bennett NOTARY PUBLIC Jackson County, NC My Commission Expires May 06, 2024 (Notary ea Off OFT V • lrZpZ'gQ r(eW sa�ldx3 uolssiwwo� �W �N '�wno'J uos�st' onend �aeloN peuueg aedooH euslieg Clyde C. Qul*nby Realty, Inc. 37OD AIRPORT N. SUITE B NAPLES, r u 34105 May 13, 2019 Re: Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM); PUDA-PL20190000259, Shadowwood PUD Dear Property Owner: Please be advised that S.D. Corporation of Naples, Inc. has submitted a petition to Collier County to provide for access to the public roadway network for the previously approved the Shadowwood PUD. The Shadowwood Planned Unit Development (PUD) is located north of Rattlesnake Hammock Road and east of Santa Barbara Boulevard, generally lying east of the terminus of Whitaker Road and Adkins Avenue. The prior approval of the PUD in 1982 restricted vehicular access to Rattlesnake Hammock Road only. The County's public policy advances and adoption of interconnectivity requirements in the Collier County Growth Management Plan make these access restrictions illegal. The landowner/Petitioner is being required to add access locations to the PUD Master Plan and remove the restricted access language in the PUD Ordinance. In compliance with the Land Development Code requirements, a Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) will be held to provide you an opportunity to become fully aware of the potential access locations being added to the Shadowwood PUD Master Plan. It should be understood that no development is currently being proposed. The County is mandating the addition of potential access locations. The Neighborhood Information Meeting will be held on Tuesday, May 28, 2019 at 5:30 p.m. at the Mayflower Congregational United Church of Christ located at 2900 County Barn Rd, Naples, Florida 34112. This is the second such meeting required by the County and is mandated due to a County notice omission for the meeting held May 7. At this meeting the land owner's representatives and County Staff will be available to explain the need for the PUD amendment and answer questions. The meeting will focus upon the discussion provided at the May 7 meeting. Should you have any questions in advance of the evening meeting, please feel free to contact me at the address above or by phone at (239) 261-1166. Sincerely C'lyd Quitiby, Agent, NIM2 PO Notice let.docx o Project Location m o 4WA J C � 0MEMO �. 0 Rattlesnake Hammock RD U ��0 0918/0916® ,Saany Dane alglledwoo ww �g x ww gZ tew�o} op a}1anb11� ��5 09 �B/09 fig® band yllM algl}edwoa „g/5 Z x „ � ezls legal 6136 THRESHER DR TRUST 720 GOODLETTE RD N #304 ��lAPLES, FL 34102 ALBERT L CANFIELD REV TRUST 6298 PARKERS HAMMOCK RD NAPLE5, FL 34112---2990 AMATO INVESTMENTS LLC 3591 SPARROW POND CIRCLE AKRON, OH 44333 ATENCIO, RODOLFO PO BOX 1246 PORTER, TX 77365 BEREZOVSKAYA, MARINA ALEX BEREZOVSKY 3960 ISLA CIUDAD COURT NAPLES, FL 34109 BERRY, MARK 4188 SKYWAY DR NAPLES, FL 34112 BOISSONNEAULT, BART 215 N PINE ST CHARLOTTE, NC 28202 BORDERS, DIANA ANN 6316 SHADOWOOD CIR NAPLES, FL 34112---1909 BRYSON, JENNIFER 3660 POLLY AVE NAPLES, FL 34112 C R & D DEVELOPERS OF NAPLES /o CHARELS TAPALIAN PO BOX 39 SEEKONK, MA 02771 7685 COLONIAL CT REALTY TRUST 53 FRENCH STREET HINGHAM, MA 02043 ALCINE, ELSON LIDEJA SAGESSE 3381 POLLY AVE NAPLES, FL 34112---2942 AMRHEIN, ADOLF & CHERYL L D 3969 SKYWAY DR NAPLES, FL 34112---2926 GADDER, SARA J 6286 SHADOWOOD CIRCLE NAPLES, FL 34112---1906 BEREZOVSKY, ALEX MARINA BEREZOVSKAYA 3960 ISLA CIUDAD COURT NAPLES, FL 34109 BETANCOURT, RAUL & ALICE J 6296 SHADOWOOD CIR #1703 NAPLES, FL 34112---1906 BOLTON, PETER G TRACY L EDMONDSON 3904 SKYWAY DR NAPLES, FL 34112---2925 BRANNON, HAROLD 3995 SKYWAY DR NAPLES, FL 34112---2926 BUCKLEY JR, ROBIN D & SUSAN O 6378 ADKINS AVE NAPLES, FL 34112---2952 CAMILA LLC 3070 POLLY AVE NAPLES, FL 34112---2726 ALAN W ZIELINSKI DELL TRUST 7640 N MILWAUKEE AVE N I LES, I L 60714---3133 ALVARADO, DENISE 6161 THRESHER DRIVE #701 NAPLES, FL 34112 ANDES HOLDINGS LLC 2055 TRADE CENTER WAY NAPLES, FL 34109 BAUER, LEE RAY B & MARLENE A 6167 THRESHER DR # 704 NAPLES, FL 34112---1905 BERNHARDT, CHARLES THEODORE 6120 THRESHER DR #1002 NAPLES, FL 34112 81BLE, SUE ANN MARY P HUGHES REV TRUST 171 3RD STREET SW NAPLES, FL 34120 BOOTHBY, HERBERT A & SUZANNE M 6335 PARKERS HAMMOCK RD NAPLES, FL 34112---2989 BROWN, MARY B 6312 SHADOWOOD CIRCLE #1801 NAPLES, FL 34112 BYERS, THOMAS A & CRYSTA R 6122 THRESHER DR NAPLES, FL 34112---1904 CANON, CLAUDIA 6141 THRESHER DRIVE NAPLES, FL 34112 STAP�.ES`� label size 1"x 2 5l8" compatible with Avery ®5160/8160 �tiauette do format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery ®5160/8160 `��'� 09 GB/0919® land Dane eigitedwoa ww lg x u�w 97, }eu�o� op a}tanblt� �� 09l$/09 �5� tiany ytlM algiledwoo „g/g Z x ,� I. ails lager �� CARROLL JR, JOHN A 695 DOUGHERTY GAP LN CLEVELAND, GA 30731 CHARLES D COLVIN LIVING TRUST 6242 ADKINS AVE NAPLES, FL 34112---2952 CLARK, JOHN R 6126 THRESHER DR NAPLES, FL 34112---1904 COLLIER CNTY C/0 REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112 CONLEY, THOMAS R 2850 59TH STREETS #309 GULF PORT, FL 33707 CORPORA FAMILY TRUST 6256 SHADOWOOD CIR #1303 NAPLES, FL 34112 CYPRESS LANDINGS II OF NAPLES LLC 2150 GOODLETTE RD N SIXTH FLOOR DEONARINE, KELVIN 3764 KENT DR NAPLES, FL 34112---3740 DIPALMA, FRANCIS J PATRICK M BREWER 6350 PARKERS HAMMOCK ROAD NAPLES, FL 34112 DOUGLAS S BARLETT REV TRUST 4109 SKYWAY DR NAPLES, FL 34112---2922 CASSIDY, KRISTIN LYN DAVID SCOTT NOBLES 6266 SHADOWOOD CIR #1403 NAPLES, FL 34112 CHRISTIAN, TOM D 3928 SKYWAY DR NAPLES, FL 34112 COCHRAN, RITA JANE 6222 SHADOWOOD CIR NAPLES, FL 34112---1906 COLLIER CNTY COMMUNITY 3301 TAMIAM) TRL E NAPLES, FL 34112 COONES JR, ARNOLD L & SHELRE J 6125 THRESHER DR NAPLES, FL 34112---1905 CRAIN, BONNY LEA 6302 SHADOWOOD CIR NAPLES, FL 34112---1909 DAMlANO, ARMAND A & MARY K 709 HUNTON PLACE NE LEESBURG, VA 20176 DETTIS, JOHNNA L 6138 THRE5HER DR NAPLES, FL 34112---1904 DISHER JR, DONALD DEVON 524 LAKE DORA DR TAVARES, FL 32778---3336 ECKERT, DAVID F MARCIA BLAIS ECKERT 8566 MANDER5TON CT FORT MYERS, FL 33912 CELCE, FREDERICK 4212 SKYWAY DR NAPLES, FL 34112---1612 CLAREY, ROBERT F & EDITH J 163 MICHAWANIC RD # 6 D SANBORNVILLE, NH fl3872 COLLEGE PARK HOLDINGS LTD 477 S ROSEMARY AVE #301 WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401 CONDON, KEVIN 6207 HANSEN RD NAPLES, FL 34112---2988 COPPOLA, MARIA LISA GARRABRANT 6165 THRESHER DR NAPLES, FL 34112---1905 CURCIO REVOCABLE TRUST 1 HARVEST LANE KINNELON, NJ 07405---3301 DAVISON, CHRISTINE M 6137 THRESHER DR NAPLES, FL 34112---1905 DEY, KEVIN & NANCY 3939 SKYWAY DR NAPLES, FL 34112 DOROTHY L HARRY LIV TRUST 4084 SKYWAY DR NAPLES, FL 34112---2924 �� label size 1 ° x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery ®5160/8160 Ftiauette do format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible aver Avery ®5160/8160 '�d'�0 091.6/0915® zany sane aigitedwaa uaw �g x ww 5Z aeu,ao� op a�anbt,� �S3-�dd1S 0918/091g® tiany U�!M a1g11edwoo „g/g Z x „� azis label ELLIN JR, ROGER E & KIM �875 30TH AVENUE SE .JAPLES, FL 34117 EPPERLY, LLOYD A JOYCE RUTH EPPERLY 4164 5KYWAY DR NAPLES, FL 34112---2928 FILITi, VALERIA 6143 THRESHER DRIVE 502 NAPLES, FL 34112 FRASE, KRIS A DARLENE KING 6216 SHADOWOOD CIR NAPLES, FL 34112---1906 GORDON, MICHAEL J & BETH A 9 N HURD CIRCLE AUBURN, NY 13021 NANKIN, LOIS D 6157 THRESHER DR NAPLES, FL 34112---1905 HASSETT, JOSEPH DONNA HASSETT 6287 SHADOWOOD CIR NAPLES, FL 34112---1907 HEISE, MAUREEN N 6204 SHADOWOOD CIR # 1902 NAPLES, FL 34112---1906 HETZNER, MARK 6107 THRESHER DR NAPLES, FL 34112---1905 HJORTAAS, ERIK S �UZANNE HAWKINS 4051 SKYWAY DR NAPLES, FL 34112---2926 ELPETHA REALTY OF FORT LAUDERDALE INC 261 SEMINOLE CT MARCO ISLAND, FL 34145---4117 ERICKSON, NORMAN J & PAULETTE 1499 BAYHILL DR NEW LENOX, IL 60451---3468 FOGEL FAMILY LIVING TRUST 17219 GLEN OAKS DR CONROE, TX 77385---4631 GARCIA, FELIPE & MARIA ELENA 6121 STANDING OAK LANE NAPLES, FL 34119 GRAFTON, RICHARD D & SONIA JO 4218 SKYWAY DR NAPLES, FL 34112---1902 HARRISON, SCOTT L DELANA DECKER HARRISON 7649 S EATON WAY LITTLETON, CO 80128 HECK, WILL{AM B 3060 POLLY AVE NAPLES, FL 34112---2726 HERNANDEZ, ANGEL NORBERTO HERNANDEZ 5210 FLEM I NG ST NAPLES, FL 34113 HICKEY, KEVIN A 6142 THRESHER DR NAPLES, FL 34112---1904 HOCEVAR TR, RICHARD G ANNETTE E HOCEVAR TR 6208 SHADOWOOD CIR NAPLES, FL 34112---1906 ESCH, THOMAS J & TAMARA SUE DAMES WARREN ESCH 4138 SKYWAY DR NAPLES, FL 34112---2928 FOUST, LINDA L 6145 THRESHER DR NAPLES, FL 34112---1905 GENOVESE, ROCCO 4024 SKYWAY DR NAPLES, FL 34112---2925 GRIFFIN, THOMAS ALAN RHONDA LYNN GRIFFIN 3952 SKYWAY DRIVE NAPLES, FL 34112 HARRY MLEAGUE JRDEED/TRUST 1701 ROSE HILL DRIVE ARLINGTON HTS, IL 60004---3549 HEFLIN, DONALD L 6246 SHADOWOOD CIR NAPLES, FL 34112---1906 HERNANDEZ, ANGEL J & RAQUEL 6199 WHITAKER RD NAPLES, FL 34112---2967 HIGGINS, DAVID A MONICA D HIGGINS 6215 PARKERS HAMMOCK RD NAPLES, FL 34112---2940 HOLDER, STEVEN R 4096 SKYWAY DR NAPLES, FL 34112---2924 ST��"'' label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery ®5160/8160 etiquette do format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery ®5160/8160 V`�� 0918/09I.g® tiany pane aigltedwoo Ww �,g x ww gZ lewaot op a�enbll� ��S��d�d1S 09 �8/09 65� rLany utlnn aigltedwoa „g/5 Z x �� l ails IagEl HOLMES, ROGER & ANITA 4093 SKYWAY DR MAPLES, FL 34112---2922 HUDSON, DOUGLAS W 5 FORTSIDE DR APT 3 FT. MITCHELL, KY 41011 JADITH ENTERPRISES LLC JACQUELINE S WINNER 4249 QUAIL LANDING POWELL, OH 43065 JEQUIER, VIOLETTE 3790 27TH AVENUE SW MAPLES, FL 34117 KLATT, ROBERT FRANK EDILMA R LOPERA AGUDELO 4158 SKYWAY DR MAPLES, FL 34112 KNIESPECK, DEE 3919 SKYWAY DRIVE MAPLES, FL 34112 KONDA, PIEDAD 6283 SHADOWOOD CIRCLE #2404 MAPLES, FL 34112 KURT BLUMENTHAL TRUST 118 PALMETTO DUNES CIR MAPLES, FL 34113 LELY RESORT MASTER PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION 1NC 2639 PROFESSIONAL CIR #101 MAPLES, FL 34119 LOUISE K ECHTTRUST 29437 VINEWOOD DR WICKLIFFE, OH 44092 HUGER, JOSEPH V & BARBARA M 3645 STATE ROUTE 982 LATROBE, PA 15650---3910 HUDSON, DOUGLAS W S FORTSIDE DRIVE APT 3 COVINGTON, KY 41011 JAY M SABOT REV TRUST 4049 SKYWAY DR MAPLES, FL 34112 JOBIN, CRAIG C GINA JOBIN 6254 SHADOWOOD CIR MAPLES, FL 34112---1906 KLING JR, RONALD S & STACY S 6238 SHADOWOOD CIRCLE #2204 MAPLES, FL 34112 KNIGHT, LISSETY 6123 THRESHER DRIVE #302 MAPLES, FL 34112 KOSANKE, EDWARD 8c TERESA 3903 SKYWAY DR MAPLES, FL 34112---2902 LAMBERT, JENNEINE 6272 SHADOWOOD CIRCLE MAPLES, FL 34112 LEROY, A THOMAS & VIRGINiA 3965 SKYWAY DR MAPLES, FL 34112---2902 LYTLE, RICHARD & ELAINE MARIE 3892 SKYWAY DR MAPLES, FL 34112---2925 HUDAK, CHRISTOPHER JOSEPH HUDAK III 4108 SKYWAY DR MAPLES, FL 34112 INSPIRA DEVELOPMENT LLC 2639 PROFESSIONAL CIR # 101 MAPLES, FL 34119 JAYNE, MELISSA 6267 WHITAKER RD MAPLES, FL 34112---2986 KING, RANDALL S MELISSA DANIELLE KING 1666 SERRANO CIR MAPLES, FL 34105 KLOPFER, GEORGE MATHEWSON 14359 MIRAMAR PARKWAY #357 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33027 KNIGHT, PATRICIA P 6258 SHADOWOOD CIR MAPLES, FL 34112---1906 KOZAK, BRIAN WlLLIAM RICHARDSON 6113 THRESHER DR MAPLES, FL 34112---1905 LAMERS, JUDITH A 6117 THRESHER DR MAPLES, FL 34112---1905 LIZOTTE, EDWARD & DOROTHY K 6218 SHADOWOOD CIRCLE MAPLES, FL 34112 MACHOULE, JULIEN & VERONIQUE 6294 SHADOWOOD CIR MAPLES, FL 34112 S1'�PL' E�` label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery ®5760/8160 �tiauette do iormai 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery �5160/8160 ��, �"� �0 0918/0915® tianb Dane a14f1edwoa ww �g x ww 5Z t2w�at op a}�anblt� S��d'�1S 09 L8/091gc� �Gany gIIM algltedwoo „g/5 � x „ l ails label ��.> MALONE, CHERYL K �76 19TH ST SW ,MAPLES, FL 34117---4448 MARGARET L SHERMAN DECL TRUST 510 GRAND BLVD PARK RIDGE, IL 60068---3435 MARTIN, JANE CRAIG 10BIN 6242 SHADOWOOD CIRCLE NAPLES, FL 34135 MCKINLEY, PHYLLIS 1 6131 THRESHER DR #401 NAPLES, FL 34112 MESSERER, JEREMY & PATRICIA 463 OAK CREEK DR S VADNAIS HEIGHTS, MN 55127---7017 MINGS, HOLLY LAUTH 6273 SHADOWOOD CIR NAPLES, FL 34112---1907 MURPHY, MORGAN 6293 ADKINS AVE NAPLES, FL 34112---2987 NAPLES CLUB ESTATES HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION INC 5515 BRYSON DR STE 502 NAPLES, FL 34109 NAPLES HERITAGE GOLF &COUNTRY CLUB INC 8150 HERITAGE CLUB WAY NAPLES, FL 34112---7703 NELSON, THOMAS G & JANET M +002 BRUSH LN NAPLES, FL 34112 MAPLES, KEITH D 6127 THRESHER DR NAPLES, FL 34112 MARTEN, WILLIAM E 3880 SKYWAY DR NAPLES, FL 34112---2920 MAURER, BRENT & CATHY 6268 SHADOWOOD CIR NAPLES, FL 34112---1906 MCS LLC 781 6TH STREET SE NAPLES, FL 34117 MiCHIE, DINA B KATHERINE MCCARTHY 6153 THRESHER DR NAPLES, FL 34112---1905 MITCHELL, KEITH A WAYNE B MITCHELL 6252 SHADOWOOD CIR NAPLES, FL 34112---1906 MYERS TR, ROY D 3874 SKYWAY DR NAPLES, FL 34112---2920 NAPLES HERITAGE CMMTY DEV DIST 210 N UNIVERSITY DR STE 702 CORAL SPRINGS, FL 33071 NAPLES LKS COUNTRY CLUB HOMEOWNERS ASSOC INC 4784 NAPLES LAKES BLVD NAPLES, FL 34112 NIETZMAN, HANS G & LESLEY P 6104 THRESHER DR # 1103 NAPLES, FL 34112---1904 MARASCO, ALFONSO JACClUELINE A MARASCO 95371 SKYLANE DR NAPLERVILLE, IL 60564 MARTIN, JANE CRAIG C JOBIN 6254 SHADOWOOD CIR NAPLES, FL 34112 MAY, BRANDON M 654 LAMBTON LANE NAPLES, FL 34104 MILLER, REGINA GERALD DOUGLAS MILLER 401 MAXWELL AVE ROYAL OAK, MI 48067---4606 MOHRBACHER, DALE & 1ACQUELINE 4025 SKYWAY DR # 23 NAPLES, FL 34112---2926 MYRTLE ANN ROSE TRUST 65 S BARRINGTON RD S BARRINGTON, IL 60010 NAPLES HERITAGE GOLF & COUNTRY CLUB iNC 8150 HERITAGE CLUB WAY NAPLES, FL 34112---7703 NASH EST, GENEVA 6234 WHITAKER RD NAPLES, FL 34112---2966 NORTH 40 LLC PO BOX 9380 NAPLES, FL 34101 STAPCES�' label size 1 " x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery ®5160/8160 etiquette do format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery ®5160/8160 �t7� Og t;�/Og ��® (�eny cane alglledwoo ww L9 x ww gZ tewaot op at}anbtt� S��dd1S 0918/09 t�® hand 4t!M aig1leduaoo „g/5 Z x „ � ails lapel <<y NUCCIO, COLLEEN 6284 SHADOWOOD CIR #1602 MAPLES, FL 34112---1906 PAPPS, FRANCIS L & JENNIFER C 3964 SKYWAY DR MAPLES, FL 34112 PRITCHARD, JENNIFER 6103 THRESHER DR MAPLES, FL 34112---1905 REED, WALTER R RITA VENTURA 14871 SW 136TH PLACE MIAMI, FL 33186 RICHARDSON, WILLlAM BRIAN KOZAK 6113 THRESHER DRIVE MAPLES, FL 34112 ROZIO, IRENA 6275 SHADOWOOD CIR # 2303 MAPLES, FL 34112 SABOT, JAY M 4049 SKYWAY DRIVE NAPLE5, FL 34112 SANTANA, MAYRA 3411 POLLY AVE NAPLE5, FL 34112---2942 SCHOOLEY, JASON P 3323 POLLY AVE MAPLES, FL 34112 SHARON B PREYSS REV LIV TRUST 195 VINTAGE CIRCLE #202 MAPLES, FL 34119 ORSCHELL, KEITH & SUZANNE 6266 ADKINS AVE MAPLES, FL 34112---2952 PFM AIR INC 4000 SKYWAY DR MAPLES, FL 34112 PROVOST, ANDREW S & JACYLN M 6214 PARKERS HAMMOCK RD MAPLES, FL 34112---2992 REICHENBERG, EDWARD 1 6147 THRESHER DR MAPLES, FL 34112---1905 ROGERS, LYNN D 6251 WHITAKER RD MAPLES, FL 34112---2986 RUSSELL TR, PAMELA 6228 SHADOWOOD CIR #2104 MAPLES, FL 34112---1906 SAMMONS, MICHAEL RHONDA HALEY 4036 SKYWAY DR MAPLES, FL 34112 SCHINDLER, RONALD & SHEILA 3961 SKYWAY DR NAPLE5, FL 34112---2902 SCHWENK, JOHN P 3976 SKYWAY DRIVE UNIT #52 MAPLES, FL 34112 SHAW, IVAN SUNNYSIDE HOUSE HUTTON-LE-HOLE YORK Y062 6UD OWENS, JEAN M 6214 SHADOWOOD CIR MAPLES, FL 34112---1906 POOLE JR, JAMES E & FILOMENA A 3100 POLLY AVE MAPLES, FL 34112---2753 R A & G E MINARD LIV TRUST 6262 SHADOWOOD CIR #1401 MAPLES, FL 34112 RICHARD & NANCY DALEY FM TRUST 4144 SKYWAY DRIVE MAPLES, FL 34112 ROSS, ROBERT & EVA 4037 SKYWAY DR MAPLES, FL 34112 S D CORP OF MAPLES INC 2150 GOODLETTE RD N 6TH FLOOR MAPLES, FL 34102 SANCHEZ, JUAN & MARLENE C 4165 POLLY AVE MAPLES, FL 34112---2943 SCHOESSEL, JUSTIN 6100 ADKINS AVE NAPLE5, FL 34112 SHAW, KENNETH L & BARBARA H 4120 SKYWAY DR MAPLES, FL 34112---2924 STAP�.ES& label size 1" x 2 5/$" compatible with Avery �5160/8�160 �tiauette do format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery �5160/8160 ��1:� `'�`�� 0918/0915® land pane algl�edtuo� �uw Lg x ww 5Z lewao� op a}}anbit� �� 09 l9/09 l.0® �Gant� UIdM algl�adwoa „g/5 Z x „ � azls lags! r; SKYWAY LLC '04 PORTS O CALL DR r�LANO, TX 75075 SOREY, KEVIN K 6128 THRESHER DR #903 NAPLES, FL 34110 SPARACINO, CHRISTOPHER GALINA SPARACINO 6368 ADKINS AVE NAPLES, FL 34112---2952 STEGENGA, SANDRA J 6279 SHADOWOOD CIR #2301 NAPLES, FL 34112---1907 STOCK DEVELOPMENT LLC 2639 PROFESSIONAL CIR #101 NAPLES, FL 34119 THE BRUCE A BISCORNETTRUST 4176 SKYWAY DR NAPLES, FL 34112---2928 THOMPSON, RICHARD L & KANDY L 6289 SHADOWOOD CIRCLE #2401 NAPLES, FL 34112 TRIBBLE, DAMES P 6105 THRESHER DRIVE #103 NAPLES, FL 34112 VALENTE, CARLA T RAYMOND E VALENTE II 6135 THRESHER DR NAPLES, FL 34112---1905 VALK, MICHAEL �36 BAYSHORE DR ENGLEWOOD, FL 34223 SMITH, JOE R 4060 SKYWAY DR # 45 NAPLES, FL 34112---2924 SOTO, NANCY J 6211 HANSEN RD NAPLES, FL 34112---2988 SPINATTO, DOSE L & HELENA B 3050 SANDY LANE NAPLES, FL 34112 STETSON, DAVID B & LISA M 3947 SKYWAY DR NAPLES, FL 34112---2902 SUCHOCKI, TONI JAN BRUCE ANTHONY 6121 THRESHER DR NAPLES, FL 34112---1905 THOMAS L CUNNINGHAM TRUST 6133 THRESHER DR #402 NAPLES, FL 34112---1905 TNT PRICE ST LLC 140 E H I LO ST NAPLES, FL 34113---8663 TRIBEC GROUP INTERNATIONAL INC 2945 ODESA DR MEDINA, OH 44256 VALLE, BLAS R & ELVIRA G 6282 SHADOWOOD CIR NAPLES, FL 34112 WALLACE, DIANNE M 6244 SHADOWOOD CIR NAPLES, FL 34112---1906 SMITH, ROY 4049 SKYWAY DR NAPLES, FL 34112 SOWALSKY, JOHN W & MARGARET A 3927 SKYWAY DR NAPLES, FL 34112---2902 SPRANG, CARL & JANET 2 COBBLESTONE CT COLUMBUS, NJ 08022---1969 STOCK DEVELOPMENT LLC 2639 PROFESSIONAL ClR #101 NAPLES, FL 34119 SYLVESTRE, EDNER A & PIERCILIA 6155 THRESHER DR NAPLES, FL 34112---1905 THOMPSON, LAWRENCE E SHARON L THOMPSON 3907 ENGLAND DR SHELBYVILLE, MI 49344---9608 TOSCANI, CARLA C 6334 PARKERS HAMMOCK ROAD NAPLES, FL 34112 TROEDEL, MARK 3150 POLLY AVE NAPLES, FL 34112---2753 VIVA II, STANLEY 1 & JESSICA I 3967 SKYWAY DR NAPLES, FL 34112 WASHBURN, JERRY C & MARSHA A 9414 AETNA ROAD CHURUBUSCO, IN 46723 �.r� Pe F �'�' label size 1 " x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery ®5160/8160 �tinuatta rin format �5 mm x f7 mm comoatible avec Avery ®5160/8160 �'1.�'� WHIPPLE, EUGENE GLAIR PHILLIP STILES WHIPPLE 30340 N DARRELL RD MCHENRY, IL 60051---7202 WILLIAM R GASTON REV TRUST 9131 PINNACLE COURT NAPLES, FL 34113 WING SOUTH INC 4130 SKYWAY DR NAPLES, FL 34112 WITTEN, PAUL &ELAINE 6234 PARKERS HAMMOCK RD NAPLES, FL 34112 YUKANTAKITWITHYAIHC HANGER SE38 GLOUCESTER AIRPORT CHELTENHAM GL516SP 0918/0915� tiany Dane algl�edwoo ww �g x ww 5z �ew�o� op a}tanbi�� `JS�-�dd1S 09 l.8/09 �5® tianb Utlnn algltEtlwoo 8/g Z x u G azl5 lagel WIGLEY, iRENA WILD, JOHN D 6298 SHADOWOOD CiR # 1704 6329 PARKERS HAMMOCK RD NAPLES, FL 34112---1906 WILSON, JOHNS & MELANIE D 622Z PARKERS HAMMOCK RD NAPLES, FL 34112---2992 WITTEN, JESSE WILLIAM 6228 PARKERS HAMMOCK RD NAPLES, FL 34112---2992 WITTEN, PAUL E &ELAINE M 6229 PARKERS HAMMOCK RD NAPLES, FL 34112---2940 ZANECKI, RICHARD D 6351 PARKERS HAMMOCK RD NAPLES, FL 34112 NAPLES, FL 34112---2989 WILSON, HICKEY J MICHELLE SPROVIERO 611 THRESHER DR #201 NAPLES, FL 34112 WITTEN, PAUL &ELAINE 6229 PARKERS HAMMOCK RD NAPLES, FL 34112---2940 YEARTON, VICTORIA LYNN DIENER 6140 THRESHER DR #802 NAPLES, FL 34112 ZOCCO, PAUL 156 SHORECREST CT MARCO ISLAND, FL 34145 �� label size 1 " x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery ®5160/8160 etiquette tlo format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery ©5160i8160 1��; 7 ®�� U2160/UyLyW f4O)IV va" 0141#ouwuu w%u LJ n ww :Iv +uu+..up v{ llwjq `�� 0919/0919® k9AV 4liM elgiledwoo 119/9 Z x , L axis logai SEMPLE, DORIS BRIAN STRATYCHUK 10291 BREWSTER BLVD S. GRAND BEND NOM 1T0 ONTARIO, CANADA EGGER, WILHELM & EDELTRAUD ULAUSEN 6:A FEIDKIRCHEN 9560 AUSTRIA EMERSON TR, PATRlCIA M PATRICIA M EMERSON REV TRUST DATED 04/03/03 5276 SHADOWOOD CIR MAPLES, FL 34112 MELONE , MICHAEL E, PR MARILYN K MELONE EST 662 CASSIE DRIVE JOLIET, IL 60435 STAPCES� label size 1 " x 2 5/8" compatible wlth Avery ®6180/8160 t:tiquette do format 25 mm x 87 mm compatible suet Avery �5180/8160 04A Neighborhood Informational Meeting Page i of SD Corporation of Naples, Inc. PUD Amendment Petition PL 20190000259 Neighborhood Informational Meeting Tuesday May 28, 2019 at 5:30 PM At Mayflower Congregational Church of Christ Name Address Email Address i C b �► / LIL << Y% 7 � +G Duct `rwvk v _ t5ts ; C r r � r Ca Iv i, 77 00 Z 6� y V ,� !�'� „_1 Aye- Y? 1 -1 CL 41 cco OmcoM t ciJ n� Neighborhood Informational Meeting Page G of SD Corporation of Naples, Inc. PUD Amendment Petition PL 20190000259 Neighborhood Informational Meeting Tuesday May 28, 2019 at 5:30 PM At Mayflower Congregational Church of Christ Name Address Email Address C4 S ► a e.,.,��1�- ram P ► MARK HETZNER Florida Notary Public 239=775=1545 Naples, Fl Cell 239=298=6298 Hetzner306@alumni.iu.edu i eP,,i Shadow Wood - Neighborhood Informational Meeting it May 28, 2019 Bill Barton [OO:OO:OO] Good evening ladies and gentlemen, my name is Bill Barton and I have been asked to moderate this Neighborhood Informational Meeting. For this modification of the Shadow Wood PUD. Chris introduce yourself, Chris Hagan's is going to be assisting tonight. To be a little redundant here, one of the requirements for us is to make a video recording of this evening's meeting even that will be transcribed. Into written form, so when we get to the question and comment period. If you will be careful with, number one. State your name and address. And number two. Try not to talk over each other because then that gives Chris a lot of trouble trying to figure out. Who is saying what? It's important that we can get your comments and your questions properly recorded. Chris will interrupt if he feels that he's having trouble getting that distinguished. With us also this evening is Tim Finn. Tim is a member of the Collier County planning staff. And this petition is brought forward by SD Corporation of Naples which is the Owner of the tract E in the Shadow Wood PUD. And Tract E is basically this area that is highlighted. Just. North of wing South east of Santa Barbara Boulevard is just off the map. To the west, you all are probably familiar with the Existing landing strip. That is a part of Wing South. We're having some of you I'm sure were here previously. NIM. Neighborhood informational meeting is referred to as a NIM. We're having a second one for the primary reason is that Collier County in providing us with the proximate individuals to be notified of this information meeting. Unfortunately I think some 57 folks were left out of that. So we're obliged to do it again and make sure that all of these people are supposed to receive a notification did receive a notification. The other thing I would point out to you if you weren't here for the neighborhood information meeting last times It was for the purpose of discussing what is referred to as a PDI. That is an insubstantial change to a PUD from that point to this point. The county has made the decision to upgrade this from a PDI to what is referred to as a PUDA. A different, the primary difference of those two is a PDI only goes before a Collier County hearing officer. Whereas a PUDA is obliged to go before the Collier County planning commission and ultimately for the Board of County Commissioners for approval or denial as the case may be of this application. Let me give you a little history of Shadow Wood and I know I'm covering the ground and some of you have already heard last time, but for those that weren't here then Shadow Wood PUD was originally approved in 1982. And it was amended in 2008. At the time of the original 1982 approval for Santa Barbara Boulevard did not exist. This map Shows Santa Barbara here, Rattlesnake Hammock to the south. This is Polly Avenue. This is Whitaker. And this is. Adkins. The primary purpose of this PUD revision is, right now there are not provisions in the PUD for access to this parcel of Shadow Wood. Moving to this map over here. This is the land we're speaking of. As you can see to the east is the existing Airstrip. Which is owned by the owners the Wing South. And East of that is all private property. North of this property is also private property some of which is actually a preserve area. There are no access points anywhere on the east or the North property lines of this tract. Property to the south of us is Wing South. And Wing South was actually in place before this PUD was established in 1982. And in Wing South, all of the roads in Wing South are privately owned. They are owned by the homeowners Association. And they have made it very clear to SD Corporation, that they have no intent of allowing their private roads to be used for access for this property for multiple reasons. Number one it's a gated community. Number two the roads are owned and maintained by the homeowners association. And number three the roads actually serve a dual purpose for vehicular as well as aircraft. They are used as taxi ways to get from the homes. There are actually homes in here that have hangars built with the home. They use those roadways to get from their hangar to the private airstrip. The last thing I want to do is cause anybody to think I'm an attorney because I'm not. Never wanted to be, never will be. But I do have a pretty good understanding that in the State of Florida, private property has a right of access. So. Neighbors cannot land lock a piece of property. They have a right of access. The only access that we can see that is viable for this are public rights of way Whitaker, Polly, and Adkins. All three of which are publicly owned. And all three of which abut this property line. Of this property. The County is, as I mentioned earlier it has made and election to move this to a PDI, from a PDI process to a PUDA process. And that. Will change our position somewhat in that we haven't. In the PDI, the only issue was the access issue. Since we're going to have to go to a PUDA which is actually an amendment process. That goes through the public hearings. It will be our intent to do two. Add to our petition two things and they're really Kind of housekeeping things. But we need to do them nonetheless. One is a little there's a little pie shaped. Piece of property right here. That's 4.35 acres. That is currently not a part of tract E. It will be in our petition to the county to allow us to add that little 4.35 acre property to tract E. It is currently owned has the same ownership, SD Corporation, that owns Tract E. And they own the little 4.35 acre parcel. So it will. We will ask that parcel be included within the boundary of Tract E. The second thing that we will revise for our petition is, right now, the property is zoned. Multifamily. And we believe that adding single family use would be the appropriate thing to do that. Would probably be just as advisable for Single family as a multifamily. So we will also add that to our petition and request to include single family as an allowable use within that property. That's basically all. All we have to present tonight. At this point I'd be happy to turn it over and let you ask questions or comment on things that you have on your mind. Once again if you would please. State your name and address. And the floor is open. Yes sir. Jeff France [00:09:26] Jeff France 6142 Adkins Avenue. Again. Just want to go back to. Originally the access to his property was supposed to go to Rattlesnake Hammock, Correct? Bill Barton [00:09:41 ]That's correct. And the PUD currently still states that. Jeff France [00:09:45] It still states that? Bill Barton [00:09:46] Yes it does. Jeff France [00:09:47] OK. And so. Why aren't we doing that Bill Barton [00:09:51 ]There's no way to get there. Jeff France [00:09:52] Because of Wing South? Bill Barton [00:09:53] Yes. Jeff France [00:09:55] OK. And then. I guess, but Wing South was there first. Bill Barton [00:10:00] That's correct. Jeff France [00:10:02] So Did something change there. Did Wing South get granted were they gated? Did something ever change there? Because. It was supposed to be that that's the access. Then something changed. And I guess my question might be to the County planner. Is why is that. Bill Barton [00:10:26] That's a great question. Another question. I'd like to answer for you donIt have an answer. Jeff France [00:10:31 ] So there's no way to know? Bill Barton [00:10:32] Maybe Tim does have an answer, but I don't have an answer. [00:10:34] Is that County property? Chris Hagan [00:10:37] Folks. First time. Come on. Take your turn. Let's announce who you are. I just want to keep it clear so that the record is clear. That's all. Jeff France [00:10:43] So nobody has that answer. Bill Barton [00:10:50] I don't have the answer. I don't. Jeff France [00:10:52] Well that would be something we feel is owed to us to find out. You know I think. Maybe just saying I mean I know it can happen but. That seems like they've got to allow something that they shouldn't have been allowed. Bill Barton [00:11:07] And. I wish I could've handled it better than I can, but I can't. Jeff France [00:11:11 ] OK. And then a follow up question is. I'm just trying to get this right. So. When you go from the. PDI. You weren't granted a PDI. Bill Barton [00:11:2'I ] Initially. It was the. Decision of the county. That this was an. Insubstantial change. Jeff France [00:11:27] Right. So a hearing wasn't required to make that decision?. Bill Barton [00:11:23] That is correct. Jeff France [00:11:30] But now you're required to go before the Planning Commission. And. Public hearing. Bill Barton [00:11:36] And and the board of County Commissioner. Jeff France [00:11:40] OK well that's good on our behalf. That's all for now. Bill Barton [00:11:46] OK. Any other questions. Comments. Yes sir. Dan Levy [00:11:54] My name is Dan Levy. I live at 6150 Whitaker road. And if you don't mind I'd like to come up to your map. Bill Barton [00:12:04] Sure. Dan Levy [00:12:04] And show where there's access possibly. That they can go to Rattlesnake Hammock. If you don't mind I'll turn this north to south. Bill Barton [00:12:14] That's fine. [00:12:22] You all notice here at the air park. And. SD Corporation owns the land over here. Which. They have shown on the map. But there is a little right of way of some sort. that goes down this canal. And. There's an area here. Over a hundred feet. Why. Did they come down. Here. A little bit over here. Right around to Rattlesnake Hammock. So. Since they're supposed to have the road to Rattlesnake Hammock. Also. My concern is the children that we have on Whitaker Road. We'll by the end of the year probably have roughly fourteen school aged children. With this development here this used to be a very private area. We were lucky to have 30 feet right down the road. Until they put Santa Barbara through and all of a sudden. Boom. But my concern is the children they don't have sidewalks. They don't have a bike path. I grant you that we would never have gotten our road paved if it wasn't for SD Corporation because we tried for the last 25 plus years to get our road paved and the county always told us it was a private road and people have to pay. And we would get our money up but we didn't get enough money up to pave our roads because the corner lots we're not seeing a loss in money. So. But. about a year ago I'm not sure but. they paved our road and I'm very thankful for it. It was very nice this year. During most of season not that UNINTELLIGBLE. But there is access here for beauty. This is section line right here but my concern is if they have 1,000 people plus down here they will all be going they will all be going down Whitaker and Atkins. We have trouble with speeders now. We have some of the stories we use when we remember people going 60, 651 70 mile an hour down our road every day. Didn't help to call the Sheriff's office. But anyway. That's. I just wanted to point that out to you all and maybe there's a reason that they can't get in here, but when I look at the aerial map there's a lot line running through that easement or some sort. Bill Barton [00:15:30] You're correct. There is an easement. The county has an easement for the canal. But it is solely for the canal. It's not wide enough. [00:15:39] But SD Corporation owns this land. Bill Barton [00:15:41 ]Well. No I don't think they own this land. They do own parcel of land here that used to be the old sewer plant. [00:15:48] Yeah, they own this parcel for sure and this parcel has the same address as this parcel. all Barton [0015:53] My point is they don't own the property to Rattlesnake Hammock Road. [00:15:57] No it stops right there, but what about there. Bill Barton [00:16:02] Well that's. Mark Hetsner [00:16:03] I believe you're cutting through Shadow Wood Villas there. Chris Hagan [00:16:07] Guys. Come on. Please help me out. Mark Hetsner [00:16:11 ] Mark Hetsner, 6107 Thresher drive Naples Florida. The road you keeping putting your finger through is parallel to Rattlesnake Hammock Road which is Thresher Drive which is where my development is where there's 98 units. So I don't know where you think there is a road going to a private housing development. Bill Barton [00:16:30] There's not a road there when the parcel was purchased. Mark Hetsner [00:16:30] Well Thresher Drive has been there for 22 years it may not be on that map but it's right where your finger was pointing. Bill Barton ,;UU Ik:..!.61 Well these are all things that can be explored as we go through the process but. We wouldn't be here today if the SD corporation had legal access to Rattlesnake Hammock, It is a matter of fact is they do not. [00 16:57j Anyway that's all I have to say. I'm just confirmed for the children and their safety. Bill Barton [00:17:07] As are we all. Are there any more questions? Yes ma'am. Sue Rochelle [00:17:10� Sue Rochelle 6266 Atkins Avenue. As you lay out this plan, this development there is no development yet so there is no traffic study. What this will all mean to us as a community. We are kind of a dysfunctional community, but we are a community. But I will tell you that a good part of our community is not paved. I mean Polly Avenue is not paved. I mean a little section of it is, but not. Sunset apparently there are some easement issues. So you're talking about putting a development on 78 acres of land. And then running that of traffic into our community. You know I would say about half of them are still limerock roads. What's the plan on that? Bill Barton [00:18:01 � Actually. What you're. What you're dealing with now are questions that. Are good questions. And. Will eventually have. Good answers. What we're doing right now is trying to establish. The zoning for the property. And the zoning. And. The PUD portion of that. Includes ingress and egress at some point in time when this property is sold and a development is proposed. That developer will have to go through the entire process again. With a site development plan. That will include I can guarantee you it will include. Traffic impact statements. It will. Include. Whether or not the roads are. Adequate for. Transportation uses. And I can tell you that. The county. Approving. A road such as Polly that is unimproved. The developer will be obliged to make. Whatever corrections are necessary. If it is their intent to use what is currently an unpaved road. Sue Rochelle [00:19:11 ]Just another question, back in the day when this was first put together if Wing South hadn't sold off that acreage. They kept it at developed it. They would have still done the whole South they would have gated the whole thing, correct? Bill Barton [00:19:30] Probably, I don't know the answer to that, but that's a logical assumption. Sue Rochelle [00:19:37] Like I said it's just kind of hard because I can see this traffic going one way. This isn't like the connectivity of a Kings Lake, Queens Park, Lakewood where you have everybody you know neighbors and a similar community this ig going to be one group plopped over here where all they are going to look at us is how to get out of here. Which is kind of sad you know because it is not going to keep put us together at all, it is going to keep us separate and I could see the concern with Whitaker being a straight shot. So that's my story Bill Barton [00:19:57] Yes, sir. Mark Hetsner [00:20:12] I have a question about who determines the density, I know there are a whole bunch of apartments and condos up there by the local church right there on Davis and Santa Barbara and I know there are some condos out on GUlfshore Drive, is it the County or who decides how many units per acre they can have and fill and have the infrastructure to support it? Who makes that decision? Bill Barton [00:20:39) Those are decisions that are being made by the County Commission. Yes, sir. Jeff France [00:20:47) Jeff France, 6142 Atkins. Have they determined, have you guys thought, how are you going to get the utilities in? Bill Barton [00:20:54] I don't know the answer that. Jeff France [00:20:57] What's your position on this whole thing? [00:21:00) I'm a professional engineer and I'm retained by SD Corporation to represent them through this rezoning process. I have no ownership interest at all, zero. [00:21:16) Explain again, because you have said there is you guys said you guys are going to go from multi family to also include some single family. Bill Barton [00:21:16] That's correct. Jeff France [00:21:27] But not all single family. Bill Barton [00:21:29] The intent right now is to add the allowable use of single family to the rezoning. Then it would be allowed to be a mixed use single family and multi family. [00:21:48) Again, we asked you this last time is there anybody interested in buying the property, is it listed for sale? Bill Barton [00:21:48) The property is not listed and I know of no interested parties right now. There was discussion at one time on this property about Collier County'0 land acquisition project Conservation Collier. There was conversation with them at one time. But it's my understanding that is not a viable processing place. Jeff France [00:22:28] The word Shadow Wood comes up in there, is what they're calling land? Bill Barton [00:22:36) That's actually the name of the PUD. Jeff France [00:22:48] So that's not going to have anything to do with Shadow Wood Bill Barton [00:22:48) No. Yes, sir. Clark Reed [00:22:48] Clark Reed, 6184 Whitaker Road in the beginning in 1982 was thae airport at Wing South already there prior to the PUD? Bill Barton [00:22:58] My understanding is that it was. Clark Reed [00:23:07] Caskey's owner all the ground, the whole area and that included Wing South and the PUD. Bill Barton [00:23:11 ] Well, I don't think Caskey owned the property at that point in time. Clark Reed [00:23:16] In 1982 they didn't own it? Bill Barton [00:23. I ) 1 don't believe they did. Clark Reed [00:23:19] Well anyway all roads in that PUD would be private. I mean not just the Wing South roads would be private too. If it was developed under the original PUD they would all be private roads. There would be no public roads in that PUD. And wouldn't there have to be a PUD amendment when they sectioned off the Wing South property from the rest of it. The 1982 shows it all on as one unit. But there's nothing in the Collier County minutes or anything that shows a PUD amendment to partition off and gate off Wing South. Bill Barton [00:24:00] If there is I haven't seen it. Clark Reed [00:24:02] So really there's never been a permission given by the county to terminate those roads on the north side of Wing South as far as Collier County is concerned you can keep on building those roads. And they're all private roads anyway. Just be all part of Wing South. You can still develop that under the original PUD right now, correct? Bill Barton [00:24:22] No I don't think that is correct. We can develop it right now, but there is no access. Clark Reed [00:24:27] Well it does too because that's all part of the original PUD. There's no way Wing South could block you from accessing Rattlesnake Hammock because they are part of the original PUD. There is nothing in the board of County Commissioners saying there was always have to turn right there which incorporated all of Wing South all in one PUD as it was originally intended. Bill Barton [00:24:46] I believe that you're incorrect. Wing South was never part of the Shadow Wood PUD. Clark Reed [00:24:51 ] Oh really? Bill Barton [00:24:54] No, Shadow Wood PUD is what you see here. In the hash marks there Wing South is right there. Clark Reed [00:25:00] But it shows the roads going through Wing South, the original PUD. Bill Barton [00:25:01 ] I agree with that. Clark Reed [00:25:09] I don't know that's kind of gobblety gook to me. Bill Barton [00:25:13] It's a bit of a mess I have to say. Clark Reed [00:25:15] Has Tract E ever had a wetlands determination done on it? Bill Barton [00:25:18] I guess. Clark Reed [00:25:20] How long ago? Bill Barton [00:25:23] I don't know the answer. I do know that there has been wetlands delineation on the property, the year it was done I'm not sure. Clark Reed [00.25.33] Was that done by South Florida Water Management? Bill Barton [00:25:36] No I would have been done by private. Clark Reed [00:25:40] And have Indian artifacts been explored too wildlife species and all that stuff? Bill Barton [00:25:46] That is all part of the process that happens when you go through the site development planning process, not when you go through a rezoning process. Clark Reed [00:25:55] Well such as a wetlands study. Bill Barton [00:25:58] Well I think that I think the property owners did that for their own edification so that they would know what portion of their land they could expect to be able to develop and which portion they couldn't. Clark Reed [00:26:10] So it hasn't been submitted to South Florida Water Management there's been no endangered species determination and no artifacts determination? Bill Barton [00:26:20] Not that I'm aware of. Clark Reed [00:26:20] Are you sure that's even marketable that piece of ground? Bill Barton [00:26:23] That's not my job currently inactive. Although I have a real estate license it is Clark Reed [00:26:30] I know a lot of developments like Falling Waters very close to maintain about 15 20 acres of their wetlands made it into a preserve a dollar an acre on the tax where they went in and cleaned up all the exotics and everything. Why don't you just do that? Bill Barton [00:26:46] That's in this area here. Clark Reed [00:26:52] Falling Waters is on the other side of Santa Barbara. Bill Barton [00:26:54] Part of this right here is also wetland preserve. Clark Reed [00:26:58] Yes that's Naples Heritage. I mean and I don't know again on conservation Collier I know that they put it in as plan B be purchased for Tract E and the thirty seven acres is a plan A and it is a top priority to purchase, but they don't have any money. Because they talked to Bill Poteet last week about it who's chairman of conservation Collier. They don't have any money or any funding from BCC for. Land purchases and they'll probably have to build a referendum. Unless they decide to borrow it or get some other source of money for it. Were you part of those discussions with Conservation Collier? Bill Barton [00:27:39] I was not. Clark Reed [00:27:41 ] Because Mr. Poteet said they're going to have access through surrounding parcels. They wouldn't even want access on Whitaker Road. If Conservation Collier bought it and Caskey offering to pay for half 01 the exotic species removal and that's why the 77 acre was Plan B because the four hundred thousand dollar investment to clear the exotics off that track. Bill Barton [00:23:05] Well your conversation with Bill PotUlu t I don't mean to be flippant but I don't have any knowledge of that so I can't discuss it. Clark Reed [00:23:15] I just don't understand why we're even here. Bill Barton [00:23:19] Well we're here because this petition the development is going to go through the process. Clark Reed [00:23:31 ] OK. Bill Barton [00:23:31 ]Any other questions? Yes sir. Jay Bowerman [00:23:33] Jay Bowerman 6125 Whitaker. My question is in your opinion is this tract of property more valuable with access on Santa Barbara as opposed to Rattlesnake? Is it a more valuable tract of property because most people are not want to go all the way to Rattlesnake. Would you say it' a more valuable piece with access further north closer to Davis. Bill Barton [00:29:04] Well. I'm not a real estate appraiser either. So I have difficulty answering that with any conviction. But right now. I can't answer this is probably more valuable. Look he doesn't have access and the answer to that is pretty much yes. No matter what it's use. Jay Bowerman [00:29:23] I'd just like to say that Whitaker can't take any more. We are taking the brunt of the entire redevelopment. All the way up, like you're saying 150 cars a day. Like I said we've got 14 kids on the street. We've done our part when it comes to traffic. We can't take anything else. Bill Barton [00:29:53] Any other questions? Comments? If not we will stand adjourned, thank you so much for your participation. Mike Sawyer Transportation Planning Collier County Growth Management 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Re Shadowwood PUDA Traffic Impact Study PL20190000259 Dear Mr. Sawyer, HAGAN ENGINEERING November 27, 2019 Digitally signed by Christopher D u.d 3OWW by Q UtWhW D Haga mi g a�Sq .aro�Pit Hagan of�.. g ny.e0 and MAId "Ow ay+anv. m b. Hrt.E m arry aMmmrt mPai Date: 2019.11.27 14:45:19-05'00' This letter is submitted as the revised traffic study for the referenced project. Shadowwood was previously permitted in 1982 as PUD Ordinance 8249 with only access to the County roadway network was at Rattlesnake Hammock Road. Santa Barbara Boulevard alignment had not been designed or built at that time. Subsequently, in 2008 the PUD was amended (PUD Ordinance 0843) to take out the commercial uses and adjust the single family residential yield. The Tract E connection noted in the original PUD to the Wing South condominium project via Skyway Drive seemed logical at the time. However, the potential conflicts with aircraft on a private roadway system connection to Skyway Drive would not be prudent. The petitioner wishes to confirm access is available from the adjoining public roadways. Meetings were held with Collier County Planning and Zoning staff to determine if the addition of accesses on the PUD Master Plan map could be done as a PDI. After the first neighborhood information meeting, staff determined that a PUD Amendment was necessary in order to accommodate connections for Tract E to the existing roads that abut the project (Atkins Avenue, Whitaker Road, and Polly Avenue). This is traffic impact study to support the PUDA. Consistent with my October 3 and November 12 telephone conversations with Tom Ross (TIS reviewer) we reviewed the unit counts regarding the referenced project. After discussion it was determined that the study should concentrate on the 364 Tract E multi- family units being proposed and their impact on the existing western roadway network. This shows consistency with the PUD documents as the existing southern portion of the project is nearly built out with 194 multi -family units and 16 single family units (total of 210 units) connected to Rattlesnake Hammock Road. The Wing South Airpark Villas project between segregates these and does not allow for trips to intermingle. Based on this the attached traffic impact statement has been revised to specifically address these 364 multi -family units (PUD total of 574 units less 210 southern units equals 364 units) in Tract E. METHODOLOGY We held a meeting on May 10, 2019 to discuss the project. At that time the agreed on methodology for this study and the email string is attached as Exhibit 1. We agree on the process to calculate and distribute the trips for the existing and remaining portions of the 1250 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 203B Naples, Florida 34102 239-228-7742 Chris@HaganEng.com PUD. This has been revised in this report to add an outline of the existing traffic connected to Rattlesnake Hammock Road that will not be altered by the proposed development changes. COMMITMENT The petitioner has committed to limit the unit type in Tract E to not exceed the maximum number of two-way PM peak hour trips allowed for the remaining 364 multi -family units available in the current PUD unit count. The PUD document and the traffic impact statement have been modified to include the following text. "The maximum total trip generation for Tract E shall not exceed 187 two-way PM peals hour trips based on the use codes in the ITE Manual on trip generation rates in effect at the time of the application for SDP/SDPA or subdivision plat approval." This trip count is based on the fitted cut•ve formula per the 10/3/19 telephone conversation with the TIS reviewers and outlined in the TRIP GENERATION section of this report. PLAN CHANGES As the Petition was elevated from a PDI to a PUDA, the Petitioner has asked that some other minor modifications be made to the PUD Master Plan. The revisions include the new access point alternatives, increase the footprint of Tract E to absorb a parcel described as Airpark North, and add the allowance for both single family residences ily residential in Tract E. The proposed use change would not be along with multifam allowed to increase unit counts or generate more PM Peals Hour traffic than the currently permitted under the multifamily trip generation allowance. These changes to the PUD Master plan are illustrated in Exhibit 2 that includes a clean print and strikethrough with underline print of the proposed new PUD Master Plan. TRIP GENERATION Tracts A, B, and C connect to the Skyway Drive and the County's network at the intersection of Skyway Drive, Rattlesnake Hammock Road, and Grand Lely Boulevard. This connection is not proposed for change and will be left in its current configuration. The southern developed portion of the Shadowwood PUD lying south of Tract E is built out with single family homes and multi -family units. All of the traffic goes to the south and ties in at Rattlesnake Hammock Road and does not change as part of this PUD amendment. The existing units include 194 multi -family units in Tract A; 16 single family lots in Tract B; and 35 single family homes in Wing South Private Villas Unit 1 that are not within the PUD boundaries. These portions of the project are nearly built out and are segregated from the proposed Tract E trips. Consistent with our conversation with these segregate and developed trips are considered background trips and are accounted for in the analysis. Tract E is proposed to be revised to have access to the adjoining roadway network at Polly Avenue, Whitaker Road, and/or Atkins Avenue. Tt•act E will have a maximum trip generation equal to the remaining 364 units using multifamily trip generation rates. Any mix of single family�and multifamily units will not exceed 364 units total or generate more two-way PM Peak Hour trips. Based on this, the Trip Generation calculations for 1250 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 203B Naples, Florida 34102 239-228-7742 Chris@HaganEng.com Tract E have been prepared and attached as Exhibit 3 - These calculations yield: Multifamily of 364 units (ITE 220) Average daily trips 2711 ADT PM Peak in 117 PM Peak out Trip Generation Calculations. The fitted curve calculations show the average daily total of 2,711 trips consistent with the correspondence and a peak hour of 187 trips used for future detailed analysis with 117 in and 69 out. These calculations have been reviewed and confirmed with the TIS reviewers. DISTRIBUTION Petitioner wishes to have access to either or each of Polly Avenue, the east end of Whitaker Road and the east end of Adkins Avenue. This could be revised based on future environmental permitting requirements from local, state and/or federal agencies. This is proposed to disburse the traffic on the network and prevent any concentration of trips to a single roadway link. Based on this, we believe that distribution could be: Polly Avenue = 30% Whitaker Road = 30% Adkins Avenue = 40% The connections to these two lane local streets will not exceed their capacity. The maximum trip count expected on any of these roads will be 50% of the 2711 AADT or 1356 daily trips. A rural two lane collector facility can accommodate 8000 AADT and remain under the low volume threshold. The Highway Capacity Manual, 6t" Edition puts the D/E Level of Service (LOS) threshold for a local street at 1000 vehicles per day. The development of this project may need to include improvements to these streets to support the expected additional traffic. The tt•ips will move to the west for connection to Santa Barbara Boulevard at Polly Avenue, Whitaker Road and Country Road. The median openings on Santa Barbara Boulevard do not allow outbound straight through (west) or left turns (south); they only allow right turns (north). Any trips going west will need to go north initially and either U-turn at the next median opening or continue north to Davis Boulevard for the next direct west route. Any trips south will need to go north initially and U-turn at the next median opening. These U-turns will require transition across three lanes of traffic to access the U-turns. This will direct the majority of the project traffic north to Davis Boulevard for disbursement north, west and east. The fewer south trips will primarily use Polly Avenue to access Santa Barbara Boulevard so that the U-turn can be made at Whitaker Road. Based on this we have prepared the Trip Distribution for the percentages of total trips distributed on the network in the regional and local inset maps (Exhibit 4). The Annual Average Daily Trips (AADT) have been distributed by percentage as outlined above and shown on Exhibit 5. This was done with the understanding that we will have a total of 2711 trips per day to be distributed on the roadway network. The 1250 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 203B Naples, Florida 34102 239-228-7742 Chris@HaganEng.com maps have been modified to note trip counts at the intersection so that each segment can be checked for the expected number of daily trips associated with the referenced project. PM Peak Hour two-way trip dlstrlblltlon was done for the maximum build out results of 187 PM peak hour trips with 117 inbound and 69 outbound. Based on the percentage breakdown outlined in Exhibit 4, the trips were distributed across the roadway network to model turning motions and check the Level of Service standards on the roadway network. The trip counts noted were rounded up to the nearest whole number and shown on Exhibit 6 to provide an accurate representation. BACKGROUND TRAFFIC Average background traffic growth rates were estimated for the segments of the roadway network in the study area using the Collier County Transportation Planning Staff guidance of a minimum 2% growth rate. Table 1, Background Traffic without Project illustrates the application of projected growth rates to generate the projected background (without project) peak hour peak direction traffic volume for the build -out year 2030. Table 1 Background Traffic without Project (20M2030) Roadway Link CC Roadway tots AUIR Project 2030 2018 2030 AUI Link Pk Hr, Pk Traffic projected Pk 1/7 Pro,jected Pk R Location Dir Annual Hr, Pk Dir Total Hr, Pk Dir Link Background Traffic Growth Rate Background Trip Background ID# Volume (%/yr) Traffic Bank Traffic (trips/hr) Volume Volume w/out Project w/out Project (tri s/hr) (tri s/hr) Santa Barbara 79.0 North of 950 2.0% 1205 139 1089 Blvd project Davis Blvd Santa Barbara 79.0 South of 950 2.0% 1205 139 1089 Blvd project Rattlesnake Hammock Rd Davis Blvd 15.0 West of 1460 2.0% 1851 196 1656 Santa Barbara Blvd Davis Blvd 16.1 East of 740 2.0% 938 225 965 Santa Barbara Blvd Rattlesnake 74.0 West of 760 2.0% 964 87 847 Hammock Rd Santa Barbara Blvd Rattlesnake 75.0 East of 530 2.0% 672 170 700 Hammock Rd Santa Barbara Blvd 1250 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 203B Naples, Florida 34102 239-228-7742 Chris cr HaganEng.com Existing and Future Roadway Network The existing roadway conditions are extracted from the 2018 Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR excerpts — Exhibit 7) and the project roadway conditions are based on the current Collier County 5-Year Work Program. Roadway Improvements that are currently under construction or are scheduled to be constructed within the five year Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) or Capital Improvement Program (CIP) are considered to be committed improvements. As no such improvements were identified in the Collier Count 2018 AUIR for this study area, the evaluated roadways are anticipated to rernain as such through build -out. The existing and future roadway conditions are illustrated in Table 2, Existing and Future Roadway Conditions, Table 2 Existing and Future Roadway Conditions Roadway Link CC AUIR Link ID# Roadway Link Location Exist Roadway Min. Standard LOS Exist Peak Dir, Peak Hr Future Project Build Out Capacity Roadway Volume Santa Barbara 79.0 North of 6D E 3100 (S) 6D Blvd. project to Davis Blvd. Santa Barbara 79.0 South of 6D E 3100 (S) 6D Blvd. project to Rattlesnake Hammock Rd. Davis Blvd. 15.0 West of Santa Barbara Blvd. 4D D 2200 (E) 4D Davis Blvd. 16.1 East of Santa Barbara Blvd. 6D E 3300 (E) 6D Rattlesnake 74.0 West of Santa 4D D 1900 (W) 4D Hammock Barbara Blvd. Rd. Rattlesnake 75.0 East of Santa 6D E 2900 (W) 6D Hammock Barbara Blvd. Rd. Project Impacts to Area Roadway Network —Link Analysis The Collier• County Transportation Planning Services develop Level of Service (LOS) volumes for the roadway links are impacted by the project, which were evaluated to determine the project impacts to the area roadway network in the future (2030). The Collier County Transportation Planning Services guidelines have determined that a project will be considered to have a significant and adverse impact if both the percentage volume capacity exceed 2% of the capacity for the link directly accessed by the project and for the link 1250 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 203B Naples, Florida 34102 239-228-7742 Chris@HaganEng.com adjacent to the link directly accessed by the project; 370 for other subsequent links and if the roadway is projected to operate below the adopted LOS standard. Based on these criteria, this project does not create any significant and adverse impacts to most of the area roadway network. The only significant impact is to southbound traffic north of the project on Santa Barbara Boulevard. None of the analyzed links are projected to operate below the adopted LOS standard with or without the project at 2030 future build - out conditions. Table 3, Roadway Link Level of Service illustrates the LOS impacts of the project on the roadway network closest to the project. Table 3 Roadway Link Level of Service (LOS) —With Project in the Year 2030 Roadway Link CC Roadway 2018 Back Roadway 2030 %Vol Min Min AUIR Link Peak Ground Link, Peak Capaci LOS LOS Link Location Dir, traffic Peak Dir, Dir, ty exceeded exceeded ID# Peak Hr (Table 1) Peak Hr Peak Hr Impact without with Capacity (Project Volume by Project? Project? Volume Vol w/ Project Yes/No Yes/No Added)* Project* * Santa Barbara Blvd. 79.0 North of project 3100 (S) 1205 SB-24 1229 2.0% No No Santa Barbara 79.0 South of 3100 (S) 1205 SB-24 1229 2.0% No No Blvd. project Davis Blvd. 15.0 West of Santa 2200 (E) 1851 EB42 1873 1.1% No No Barbara Blvd. Davis Blvd, 16.1 East of Santa 3300 (E) 965 EB-12 977 1.2% No No Barbara Blvd. Rattlesnake Hammock Rd. 74.0 West of Santa 1900 (W) 964 WB-18 982 1.8% No No Barbara Blvd, Rattlesnake Hammock Rd. 75.0 East of Santa 2900 (W) 700 WB43 713 1.8% No No Barbara Blvd. *Values taken from Exhibits 6 PM Peak Hour distribution **2030 projected volume with project volume added 1250 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 203B Naples, Florida 34102 239-228-7742 Chris@HaganEng.com Turn Lane Analysis Connection to subject project is proposed via a left in/right in/right out connections at Polly Avenue, Whitaker Road, and Country Road to Santa Barbara Boulevard. Santa Barbara Boulevard is a six -lane north -south urban divided arterial under Collier County jurisdiction, and has a posted legal speed of 45 mph in the vicinity of the project. Based on MOT Index 301 (Exhibit 8) notes design speed of 45 mph, the minimum turn lane lengths can be calculated for each connection to Santa Barbara Boulevard. Turn lane lengths required at build -out conditions are analyzed based on the number of turning vehicles in an average one -minute period for right -turning movements, and two - minute period for left -turning movements, within the peak hour of traffic. The minimum queue length is 25 ft. and the queue/vehicle is 25 ft. Santa Barbara Boulevard at Polly Avenue — Right Turn In A dedicated right -turn lane is warranted as the project meets the multi -lane criteria. Proposed project is expected to generate 45 vph right -turning movements during the PM peals hour. At minimum, the turn lane should be 210 ft. long (to include a minimum 25 ft. of storage). The existing right turn lane is 310 ft., which is adequate at this location for the project traffic. Santa Barbara Boulevard at Polly Avenue —Left Turn In A dedicated left -turn lane is warranted as the project meets the multi -lane criteria. Proposed project is expected to generate 3 vph left -turning movements during the PM peak hour. At minimum, the turn lane should be 220 ft. long (to include a minimum 25 ft. of storage). The existing right turn lane is 345 ft., which is adequate at this location for the project traffic. Santa Barbara Boulevard at Whitaker Road — Right Turn In A dedicated right -turn lane is warranted as the project meets the multi -lane criteria. Proposed project is expected to generate 45 vph right -turning movements during the PM peak hour. At minimum, the turn lane should be 210 ft. long (to include a minimum 25 ft. of storage). The existing right turn lane is 285 ft., which is adequate at this location for the project traffic. Santa Barbara Boulevard at Whitaker Road —Left Turn In A dedicated left -turn lane is warranted as the project meets the multi -lane criteria. Proposed project is expected to generate 24 vph left -turning movements during the PM peak hour. At minimum, the turn lane should be 220 ft. long (to include a minimum 25 ft. of storage). The existing right turn lane is 310 ft., which is adequate at this location for the project traffic. U-turn — Southbound Santa Barbara at Whitaker Road Intersection The existing southbound U/left-turn lane is approximately 340 feet long. The project is expected to generate additional 10 vph during the PM peak hour. The existing U/left-turn is adequate to accommodate the additional proposed traffic at this location. 1250 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 203B Naples, Florida 34102 239-228-7742 Chris@HaganEng.com U-turn — Southbound Santa Barbara at Country Road Intersection The existing Southbound U/left-turn lane is approximately 300 feet long. The project is expected to generate additional 14 vph during the PM peak hour. The existing U/left-turn is adequate to accommodate the additional proposed traffic at this location. Improvement Analysis Based on the link analysis and trip distribution, the proposed project has a significant impact on Santa Barbara Boulevard both north and south of the site and on Rattlesnake Hammock road east of Santa Barbara Boulevard. The current AUIR notes these roadway segments to have Level of Service B. The minimum standard LOS for these roadway segments is E. This project Is impact is negligible in the future capacity analysis of the collector and arterial roadway network. No new additional collector or arterial roadway improvements at this location are warranted. There is adequate and sufficient current and future roadway capacity to accommodate the proposed development generated trips without adversely affecting the adjacent roadway network level of service. Mitigation of Impact The dwelling units noted in the Petition are currently vested and were considered in order to prepare the current and many of the past AUIRs that are the basis for the Capital Improvement Program. The Petitioner proposes that at the time of development the owner will pay the appropriate Collier County Road Impact Fee to reimburse the County for the roadway improvements costs in that "Impact Fee District". These improvements should be limited to the local streets. A preliminary estimate of the potential Road Impact Fees (Exhibit 9) for the vested units outlined in the preceding narrative could range from $1.89 million to $2.02 million. 1250 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 203B Naples, Florida 34102 239-228-7742 Chris@HaganEng.com er From: SawyerMichael <Michael.Sawyer@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Friday, May 10, 2019 12:53 PM To: Christopher Hagan Subject: RE: Shadowwood PDI to PUDA Chris, Thanks. Please use this email as meeting your TIS Methodology meeting requirements. Please note on the TIS coversheet that the fees will be collected at time of PUD submittal. Let me know of any questions as you move forward. Thanks and have a great weekend, Michael Sawyer Principal Planner Growth Management Department Transportation Planning 2685 South Horseshoe Drive, Suite 103 Naples, Florida 34104 239-252-2926 niichael.saw�.-er,ti�col liereuLintyfl. OV From: Christopher Hagan <Chris@haganeng.com> Sent: Friday, May 10, 2019 12:46 PM To: SawyerMichael <Michael.Sawyer@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: RE: Shadowwood PDI to PUDA Mike, This email is submitted to document our Friday May 10 conversation regarding the referenced project. The purpose of our conversation was to discuss the traffic impact statement methodology for the referenced project. We discussed how the project has evolved from a simple PDI into a PUD amendment. During our discussion it was determined that the traffic impact statement could be relatively simple in that it would take the existing subdivision, review the available units and the undeveloped portion of the site to determine a build out unit count and traffic demand. Two alternatives should be reviewed: • If no access were provided other than what is in the original PUD (Rattlesnake Hammock Road) • Utilizing the existing County public road rights of way to disperse the trip distribution We confirmed that the existing Polly Avenue, Atkins Avenue, Sunset Boulevard and Whitaker Road have all been recently paved and adjoin the subject property. These are public road rights of way and the land development code requires that we connect to these to provide for traffic interconnection and trip distribution on the network. I will meet with the owners on Monday and get a determination of the proposed unit data going forward and we will work on the traffic impact statement based on this criteria. By email response please confirm that this is accurate and correctly reflects our discussion. If so this will document our traffic study methodology meeting on the project. Thanks for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Chris Hagan HAGAN ENGINEERING Hagan Engineering 1250 Ta niami Trail North, Suite 203B Naples, FL 34102 (t} 239-228-7742 ,c) 239-85I-8239 Chris,«? HaganEng.com www.haganeng.com From: SawyerMichael (mailto:Michael.Sawyer@colliercountyfl.�ov] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2019 10:56 AM To: Christopher Hagan <Chris@haganeng.com> Subject: RE: Shadowwood PDI to PUDA Chris, I have no knowledge of this petition change. I approved the original PDI request on 3-15-19 and have not been part of any of the issues -discussion below. If zoning has determined that there are transportation impacts then I would make sure they outline those impacts for you. From my departments perspective we can of course review a standard TIS that would outline those impacts however if my memory is correct there were no additional dwelling units proposed (hence original PDI designation) so the TIS would be a simply small scale showing no impacts? Again if Zoning needs to document local road impacts then perhaps a simple standard TIS that showed the trip count based on the existing -allowed residential uses, PM Peak Hour trips, and a standard distribution map-calcs, in this case onto the local roads first and then onto the collectors. If the issue is serious enough perhaps including both with -without proposed changes which would likely simply show a reduction at the existing access and increases at the proposed new accesses on the local roads. Sorry I can't offer additional guidance...l'm as much in the dark honestly on this one. Let me know of follow-up questions. Thanks, Michael Sawyer Principal Planner Growth Management Department Transportation Planning 2685 South Horseshoe Drive, Suite 103 2 Naples, Florida 34104 239-252-2926 michael.sawyer @coIIiercountyfl.bov From: .com> Sent: Friday, May 10, 2019 10:30 AM To: SawyerMichael <Michael.Sawyer@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: FW. Shadowwood PDI to PUDA Mike, Can you please send me something in writing that outlines the traffic study requirements associated with the referenced project. I'd like to understand how you want us to handle the units, zoning, distribution, and other considerations. I have a 3 PM meeting at the County this afternoon regarding another project. I would be happy to meet with you before or after if it works for your schedule. Thanks for your consideration, I look Forward to hearing from you. Sincerely, Chris Hagan �HAGAN ENGINEERING Hagan Engineering 1250 Tamiami Tran North, Suite 203B Naples, FL 34102 (t) 239-22am/ 742 (c) 239451-8239 Chris;a�HaganEng.com www.lia aneng.com From: FinnTimothy [mailto:Timothy.Finn@colliercountyfl.�ov] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2019 8:48 AM To: Christopher Hagan <Chris@haganeng.com>; BellowsRay <Ray.Bellows@colliercountyfl.�ov>; SmithCamden ,Camden Smith @colliercountyfl.qov>; MartinezGilbert <Gilbert.Martinez@colliercountyfl.�ov> Cc: BosiMichael <Michael.Bosi@colliercountyfl.gov>; Clyde Quinby<c.quinbv@aol.com>;'Bill Barton' <wlbarton39@gmail.com>, iohncaskey@aol.com; Robert M. Buckel <RMB@wbclawyers.com> Subject: RE: Shadowwood PDI to PUDA Hi Chris, Please see responses below in bold red. Timothy Finn, AICP Principal Planner CoT rier Couvity Zoning Division NOTE: New Email Address as of 1210912017, Tii-nothy.Finnii-1',collierig�ountyfl.nov 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples Florida 34104 Phone: 239.252.4312 Tell us how we ore doing by taking our Zoning Division Survey at http://bit.lvlCollierZonin�. Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. if you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. Frorn: Christopher Hagan <Chris@ha�anen�.com> Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2019 8:41 AM To: BellowsRay <Ray.Bellows@colliercountyfl.gov>; FinnTimothy <Timothy.Finn@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: BosiMichael <Michael.Bosi@colliercountyfl.gov>; Clyde Quinby <c.guinby@aol.com>;'Bill Barton' <wlbarton39@gmail.com>; johncaskey@aol.com; Robert M. Buckel <RMB@wbclawyers.com> Subject: Shadowwood PDI to PUDA Gentlemen, I understand from our telephone conversations that it is the County's opinion that our project requires a PUDA instead of a PDI. In order to document and confirm this please provide us a written outline of the reasons and requirements. We would like to have some direction in writing from you all that shows that the changes and adjustments we are making are per your direction. We want to be able to confirm these requirements. If you could please provide the following I would appreciate it: • Why the initial PDI application needs to be converted to a PUDA? Upon completion of the multifamily residential in Tract E within the Shadowwood PUD, there is the perception among the neighborhood residents of additional trips and traffic on the following local roads: Polly Ave, Whitaker Road, and Adkins Ave. These additional trips were not contemplated in the PUDs original adoption along these local roads. There was considerable opposition at the NIM on this issue. It is staff's opinion that this petition be categorized under LDC Section 10.02.13(E)(1)(e), "A substantial increase in the impacts of the development which may include, but are not limited to increases in traffic generation; changes in traffic circulation; or impacts on other public facilities." As such, this change is substantial and will be deemed a PUDA. • If it is a PUDA, is it insubstantial, minor or major? Substantial • Who made this determination? GMD staff including Mike Bosi, Ray Bellows, and myself • What specific issues led to this decision? 0 See answer to first question • What application requirement changes can be expected with the permitting change? There will not be additional costs from this conversion to a PUDA. LouYwill still need to pay any additional advertising costs that may be incurred. We will ask that you fill out the PUDA application which is available on the county website and submit a traffic study. Please contact Mike Sawyer (239-252- 2926) from Transportation on the requirements for this traffic study. By better understanding these items we can move forward on the project with the knowledge of how and why this determination was made. We need to document that this is the requirement by County staff and/or review as opposed to being voluntarily modifications being provided by the owner/applicant. I appreciate your consideration regarding this request and look forward to getting your justification in writing. Sincerely, Chris Hagan HAGAN ENGINEERING Hagan Engineering 1250 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 203B Naples, FL 34102 (t) 239-228-7742 (c) 23M514239 ChriSOMaganEng.com www.haganengcorn 5 Polly Ave. Oe. 2019 B.1 Tom TRACT E Ingress/Egress TBD at SDP/PPL C� TRACT C TRACT B ENTRANCE DRNE— (SKYWAY DRIVL) TRACT A 0 1CR1 200 400 CfalF IN FEkr SHADOWWOOD PUD MASTER PLAN SUM ARY DESCRIPTION APPRO:cIMATE q_CR G ��.1,1.ING UNITS TRACTS A k F: - RFSir?FNTIAL 117.65t 558 TRACT 8 - SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 5.68i 16 TRACT C - PRIVATE AIR PARK DISTRICT 41.78f N/A ENTRANCE DRIVE 3.0t N/A TOTALS 168 1± 574 GROSS DENSITY 3,41 JNlTS/ACRE PREPARED FOR: ©HAGAN SH.ADOWW000 PUDA _ S.D. CORPORATION OF NAPLES IN(:. r= v �� I ^ r: � r<I N c PL201900002�9 ? I i0 GOOpLETTE RD. N. NAPLES. FL :41 1j 12 ° �pricnd nNowrn sre 2o3e N.Pin., I'lantla 0410<102 Ph]nt 239i 051-9239 6XHIE3IT E3 SHADO\4�WOOD PUD T`4ASTER PLAN 'E PRG�FfI N0 3CM1LE ERFT 0�/03/�9 2019-7�0 M1 Fhowr. or �� A'RFARK NORTH d 35 AC _J' t 7 LECEHD - !_ ��.�� i � - TRACT E � -...� I I I I __nt I nY Y Ct; y w l _ ed ingress/Egress S (TRD at SDPIPPI J �� ._ Polly Ave. Q C '� �r TRAM' ; TRAcr e �- FNTHaNCF DP�4E-� ' (SKYWAY DRNE) TRACT A `, —___�= �i - _... __ -�- z-� �� -- r--,r, lr»i Teo goo SCALE: t' - 100' 6Q. a -a o ° � 30 Y S � I ' T -C cr, � rn II x O o � �' I c N ,..7 .-�.:.r-; �/(. D;,I. rlG'. uc'ipF rl ��•. 'yUM1A9RV pFC_C IPTION ±•�'FFv •�"r TI__�: _ __. DWELLING UNITS TRACTS A do E — "A`" �' "RESIDENTIAL "? =x _ 55B TRACT R — SINGLE—FAMILY RESIDENTIAL '� ,`i,@$f a-t },y 1 TRACT C - PRNATE AIR PARK DISTRICT 37-8'�- _,__ ._ N/A FNTFANCF. DRIVE 3 Ot` N/A TOTAI 5 16B 7 f i69 574 I GR055 DENSRY 336 at UNITS/ACREt � NOTE: TFn WAS RECREATED FROtvi THE ORIGINAL A .. u MASTER PI.nN. I.�,. TTENTION WAS � 'uMIZE UNINTENTIONAL REVISIONS _ aTENDED CHANGES ARE SHOWN IN STRIKE—i r �_ � I 'r -LINE FORIJh " 11MMARY TABLE AND I I'�' _ ' I::;.� cHArJCFS TO TRACTS 8 & C. Q. GRADY MINOR & ASSOCIATES, P.A. fletl c�01\2MA • L\VP NIP\lPIMc • M.1N\RPc • 11.n W1\n IpCpITrRA vnir.vwwu rcxl a. . ..�rmm.r � U'NY\' IlP�D1TIM[1P fUM PUD MASTER PLAN EXHIBIT B exert 1 er 1 Exhibit 3 - Trip Generation Calculations Proposed trips from Tract E to Santa Barbara Blvd. Per discussion with TIS review team the fitted curve numbers are preferred based on the unit count and number of studies. AADT = 2711 trips PM Peak Hour = 117 in and 69 out =maximum total 187 Land Use 220 data attached. Land Use: 220 Multifamily Housing (Low -Rise) Description Low-rise multifamily housing includes apartments, townhouses, and condominiums located within the same building with at least three other dwelling units and that have one or two levels (floors). Multifamily housing (mid -rise) (Land Use 221), multifamily housing (high-rise) (Land Use 222), and off -campus student apartment (Land Use 225) are related land uses. Additional Data In prior editions of ram' Generation Manual, the low-rise multifamily housing sites were further divided into rental and condominium categories. An investigation of vehicle trip data found no clear differences in trip making patterns between the rental and condominium sites within the ITE database. As more data are compiled for future editions, this land use classification can be reinvestigated. For the three sites for which both the number of residents and the number of occupied dwelling units were available, there were an average of 2.72 residents per occupied dwelling unit. or the two sites for which the numbers of both total dwelling units and occupied dwelling units were available, an average of 96.2 percent of the total dwelling units were occupied. This land use included data from a wide variety of units with different sizes, price ranges, locations, and ages. Consequently, there was a wide variation in trips generated within this category. Other factors, such as geographic location and type of adjacent and nearby development, may also have had an effect on the site trip generation. Time -of -day distribution data for this land use are presented in Appendix A. For the 10 general urban/suburban sites with data, the overall highest vehicle volumes during the AM and PM on a weekday were counted between 7:15 and 8:15 a.m. and 4:45 and 5:45 p.m., respectively. For the one site with Saturday data, the overall highest vehicle volume was counted between 9:45 and 10:45 a.m. For the one site with Sunday data, the overall highest vehicle volume was counted between 11:45 a.m. and 12:45 p.m. For the one dense multi -use urban site with 24-hour count data, the overall highest vehicle volumes during the AM and PM on a weekday were counted between 7:00 and 8:00 a.m. and 6:15 and 7:15 p.m., respectively. For the three sites for which data were provided for both occupied dwelling units and residents, there was an average of 2.72 residents per occupied dwelling unit. The average numbers of person trips per vehicle trip at the five general urban/suburban sites at which both person trip and vehicle trip data were collected were as follows: • 1.13 during Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, one hour between 7 and 9 a.m. • 1.21 during Weekday, Peak Hour ofAdjacent Street Traffic, one hour between 4 and 9 p.m. The sites were surveyed in the 1980s, the 1990s, the 2000s, and the 2010s in British Columbia (CAN), California, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Maine, Maryland, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, Ontario, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, and Washington. \ t is expected that the number of bedrooms and number of residents are likely correlated to the number of trips generated by a residential site. Many of the studies included in this land use did not indicate the total number of bedrooms. To assist in the future analysis of this land use, it is important that this information be collected and included in trip generation data submissions. Source Numbers 168, 187, 188, 204, 211, 300, 305, 306, 319, 320, 321, 357, 390, 412, 418, 525, 530, 571, 579, 583, 864, 868, 869, 870, 896, 903, 918, 946, 947, 948, 951 Multifamily Housing (Low -Rise) (220) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Dwelling Units On a: Weekday SettinglLocation: Number of Studies: Avg. Num. of Dwelling Units: Directional Distribution: General Urban/Suburban 29 168 50% entering, 50% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per Dwelling Unit Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 7.32 4.45 - 10A7 1.31 Data Plot and Equation 5A00 X 4,000 i ; 3,000 ` n F� H 2,00 X X X X 1.000 X "X 100 200 300 400 500 600 X= Number of Dwelling Units X Study Site Fitted Curve - - - - Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation: T = 7.56(X) - 40.86 RM= 0.96 Multifamily Housing (Low -Rise} (220 ) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: On a: Setting/Location: Number of S`udies Avg. Num, of Dwelling Units: Directional Distribution: Dwelling Units Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. General Urban/Suburban 42 199 23% entering, 77% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per Dwelling Unit Average Rate Range of Rates 0.46 0.18 - 0.74 Data Plot and Equation 2a �o X= Number of Dwelling Units X Study Site Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T) = 0.95 Ln(X) - 0.51 Ftted Curve Standard Deviation 0.12 - _ = Average Rate M u Itifam i ly Housing (Low -Rise) (220 ) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: On a. Setting/Location Number of Studies Avg. Num. of Dwelling Units Directional Distribution Dwelling Units Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. General Urban/Suburban 50 187 63% entering, 37% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per Dwelling Unit Average Rate 0.56 Data Plot and Equation 500 200 X o� 0 X Study Site X Range of Rates 0.18 - 1425 X "X' X �t }CX x X-s" l X X "LUU X= Number of Dwelling Units Ftted Curve F�uation: Ln(T) = 0.89 Ln(X) - D.02 Fiited Curve Standard Deviation 0.16 .1� Rate I000 0 00 sj (61)) +j 1 �j t T(2U) °� I I o f L 10320 0—� o0 1 I moo LO COUNTRY ROAD (2u)15 T I s o 14� I I 0 0 0 1 I- IO IJ IO I! 29 (6D) r� 0 (2U) SHADOW WOOD PUD 1 1 Z 15—� N N TRACT E r � 15 WHITAKER ROAD (21.1) 15 WHITAKER ROAD (2u) 0 p of p W Q Z 1 0 (2U) r (6D) Q T ! J to o o O (2U) a O I' m L z0 ADKINS AVE � � zc z (2U) (2U) O N POLLY AVE REAR GATE TO ROYAL WOOD LEGEND (2U) (2U) 2U = 2 LANE UNDIVIDED c o 0 0 o L 0 4D = 4 LANE DIVIDED 1 20 6D = 6 LANE DIVIDED OUT (6D) ° 4t ° T r T RAC � BOTH I NEUTRAL 21 —s 20 0 0 � G 1 _. TlSdwg, Nov 22, 2019, 1:31pm Q HAGAN PREPARED FOR: E�131;�EERI�c SD CORPORATION OF NAPLES, INC. 1250 TAMIAhII TRAIL NORTH, STE 2038 Naples, Florida 34102 Phone (239) 851-8239 ®1 SC�tE IN =:Ef PERCENTAGE INSET 11/22/2019I2018-217I As Shownl 1 OF 2 000 GLEN EAGLE BLVD (\D) j 1 7 � 1 <-- 9 0 DAVIS BLVD r 1 (4D) 0 0 —► p p 7 COUNTRY ROAD (2U) WHITAKER ROAD (2U) ❑ E- 0 2 (2U) (6D) (2U) POLLY AVE NORTH 10 23 vw® LEGEND 2U = 2 LANE UNDIVIDED 2D = 2 LANE DIVIDED 4D=4 LANE DIVIDED 6D = 6 LANE DIVIDED TRIPS IN TRIPS OUT BOTH I NEUTRAL TRIPS TRACT E CONNECTS AT POLLY AVE, WHITAKER RD, AND ADKINS AVE. 1RACT E <� '5 / 15--> I _ •- O I� N tll '� H p O O � o (41)) 0 (4D) 32 TRATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK ROAD w I 00 (2D) ¢ > (4D) TIS.dwg, Nov 22, 2019, 1:31pm Jm HAGAN PREPARED FOR: E � G i NE E RI N G SD CORPORATION OF NAPLES, INC. 1250 TAAtIAMI TRAIL NORTH, STE 2038 Naples, Florida 34102 Phone (239) 851-8239 SHADOW WOOD PUD PROJECT LOCATION TRACT A,B, 8 C CONNECT AT RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK (6D) Q J Z❑ � (�7 m PER RL'GIONAL 11/22/2019 2018-217 I As Shown I 2 OF Z o �IIio o 1 L ° (6D) j 1 ° 41tr (2U) ° 1t � O Y/ cvmo �407 Quo LO y E— 407 COUNTRY ROAD (2U) Tr �° o 407—� (� 407 T I g o0o L0 ° o00 O N IN IO- 1�� •� 814 786 (6D) t./1 'rr° 0 I (2U) ° t r� AI,� � SHADOW WOOD PUD 0 a° 07 TRACT E .- 407 WHITAKER ROAD (2U) WHITAKER ROAD (2u) �'L` m w �� L° U) Q (6°) Q U) f (2 X (2U1 0 o a m ADKINS AVE 542 -� Z (2U) ° = Q (2u) o in n REAR GATE TO ROYAL WOOD � LEGEND 2U = 2 LANE UNDIVIDED 2D = 2 LANE DIVIDED 4D = 4 LANE DIVIDED 6D = 6 LANE DIVIDED 0 IN . OUT M BOTH/NEUTRAL TIS.dwg, Nov 22, 2019, 1:32pm POLLY AVE (2U) (sD) ° — L 0 542 542 HAGAN PREPARED FOR: F r` G l v F. E R I N G SD CORPORATION OF NAPLES, INC. 1250 TAMWlAI TR/UL NORTIi, 57E 203B Naples, Florida 34102 Phone R35) 851-3239 J AADT INSET iQLC IN FEET m U Q 11/22/2019f2018-217` As Shown I 1 OF 2 000 GLEN EAGLE BLVD (\D) I I I 19D � 27 LD G90 f-- 244 f 0 DAVIS BLVD I 1 (4D) I 0 —) ry oo 190� ❑ O z ¢ (2U) z >m 7 O U o: 1 L 27 j-- 27 Tr 0 0 0 (4D) TIS.ds+g, Nov 22, 2019, is J2pm COUNTRY ROAD (2U) WHITAKER ROAD (2U) (2U) Lo 54 (BD) LEGEND 2U = 2 LANE UNDIVIDED 2D = 2 LANE DIVIDED 4D =4 LANE DIVIDED 6D = 6 LANE DIVIDED TRIPS IN TRIPS OUT BOTH / NEUTRAL TRIPS TRACT E CONNECTS AT POLLY AVE, WHITAKER RD, AND ADKINS AVE 407--� i (2U) "0 jRACT E 4— 407 / 407—i �W U t- a ¢ (2U) ¢ )KINS AVE 542—, ( Cr 4— -42l (2U1 m (2U) POLLY AVE i I} �INm I i¢ 1 063 1 �;m� 109 (6D) Q (4D) 9a9 RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK ROAD D `l T f 3 °_� `11 f 0 W 24 1 ONG ❑ 2� o0 J � m H �� PREPARED FOR: ENGINEERING 1280 7AMIAMI TRNL NORTH, STE 2038 SD CORPORATION OF NAPLES, INC. Naples, Florida 34102 Phone (239) UI-8239 SHADOW WOOD PUD PROJECT LOCATION TRACTA,B, & C CONNECT AT RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK J W J ❑ z❑ � J �m Noanl SCHE IN F_ET AADT REGIONAL 11/22/2019 � 2018-217 F As Shown 1 2 OF 2 0 ° � �1 m �mo COUNTRY ROAD t2u) (2U) ° I T o� o Io clpi Io• �+ Tz (6D) 3 ��Tr =y P WHITAKER ROAD (zu) O O P REAR GATE TO ROYAL WOOD LEGEND 2U = 2 LANE UNDIVIDED 2D = 2 LANE DIVIDED 4D = 4 LANE DIVIDED 6D = 6 LANE DIVIDED M IN OUT BOTH/NEUTRAL T)S.dwg, Nov 22, 2019, 1:32pm (6D) (zu> WHITAKER (zu) (2U) LD w OJp Cf) ° (2U) Q r Q Cl) a � (2U) m ADKINS AVE ZQ (2U) /19 POLLY AVE (zu) o o0o L_0 BTU- 27 O 4 H 7SHADOW WOOD PUD =� TRACT E ^ _v` ay PREPARED FOR: ENGINEERING SD CORPORATION OF NAPLES, INC. I250 TAMIAMI TRAIL NORTH, STE. 2038 Naples, Florida 34102 Phana l239) 851-8239 U U RAC PM PEAK HOUR INSET 11/22/2019'2018-217I As Shown I 1 OF 2 000 GLEN EAGLE BLVD (4D) I i (4D} p 3 —� (4D) TIS.dwg, Nav 22, 2019, 1:32pm Loeo 0 � Iz r 0 DAVIS BLVD (4D) 0 I11 0-� �o0 16� o r �� L3 �3 Tr* 00 COUNTRY ROAD (2U� WHITAKER ROAD (2U� (6D) LEGEND 2U = 2 LANE UNDIVIDED 2D = 2 LANE DIVIDED 4D = 4 LANE DIVIDED 6D = 6 LANE DIVIDED TRIPS IN TRIPS OUT BOTH / NEUTRAL TRIPS TRACT E CONNECTS AT POLLY AVE, WHITAKER RD, AND ADKINS AVE. (2U)+AVE 1TRACTE !21 ->U S47-� (2U) POLLY AVE Ll SHADOW WOOD PUD PROJECT LOCATION TRACT A,B, $ C CONNECT AT RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK m N � ))ffS I IfY 0 (4D) 74 RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK ROAD } 0 Tr Lq 3 _i Lq It , o 0 0 ¢ p Z (4D)�(D (2D) J r� com V1 m HAGAN PREPARED FOR: E\ G I N E E R I N G SD CORPORATION OF NAPLES, INC. 1250 TANIAMI TRAIL NORTH, 57E. 203B Naples, Florida W02 Phone (239) 851-8239 PM PEAK HOUR IN REGIONAL 11 /22/2019 12018-217 I As Shown I 2 OF 2 L316 '_01; EOIS 21117 IIII] 1017 20U Trali 1l7m trip PralHwr PrAk P.al Prah 21i1t ±01n 2UIJ 1f7m 4'er.R 201e Illm Ir11b TB CaaW Bug. Pak far Haar lit Fleur Actual Perna/ J017 L'71h Tead IMA TO 20111 U71h Tsui I; lb TB Nle L Yor Ynr East Col. Sxa Pul Senior 11ol. Dir Pr Dir Pak air Varia6m 3'a4utive Ir"ip Trip Trip 21417 trip Trip Trip 2019 Remia. IDth TO 0 Expected 4pat 63U 794?4 4:1119a Saeae Qi+e imirW Rod US 411Taeumi Tral( 41)311 D E I- 9A 970 1® 90 92r ) G 'l.'0 p O IfbO 640 624'.: C 64.0 14 51041 CRd96 ?Sae Rldc Rwd US AI :Taaumi Tra7V -,. �cxcfrank ROW ED 512 E E JIM law 130 691r" 6 '(66 0 6 1996 !W 713% C 650 14 65V41 CRF96 Five Rtda Real 1ndkJ Ftnk Road >hvW Saa1 6D 514 E IF 19J0 19n 14w 19 1)JJA - 1 Few •. O fi l986 114 '.09% C "a 74 54012 CR69a pee R)de Rand S!-rrkv CeO-e^ A Rod fD 515 E 1250 1390 10 33 r 242 21 0' _'4 7_4W 306 19.1% D 2011 671 11 50111 C1YM RIda R.u1 F.a3 tiairlp>L:. Rod 6D 526 E 3 15T IHr 60 1}a.' 35': 0 - 25i5 J C' p 26)9 -MI uJT6 IS 1025 671 41 66111 CR1% Pac Ridur Red Row I-%5 FD 6'1 - 3.000 27A _ 4d ( JOB 0 103 _-%M3 112 to 3142 (111I IU4T: F Esslisc Exisom MO 41 9A907 B/16 Poe RdeaRead 1.:5 Lowto Bvkrad AD AEG E M-NO - :it T) 31T 1 0 [ 11_`i 1 0 t irm 609 713': II 690 15 6.5031 LR156 Rasa Raid A Road mRud <D $4 D - 1iwo 119 1:6G �5+5 0 0or, 15 0 15 1 M 3 0 3 Itl3 617 63.M I C 700 IS 65033 CR856 RJda Rood Aim too Raw Sae.:: Baltlsn BadevsJ =D 517 D I3100 III FIX 070 40 354!' 26 0 26 5136 6 0 6 1116 624 653`.: 1 C 710 i6 65031 Ctt116 ReAo RaAd Snbft Mra Beurad Dives 0.Assnd I +C D W I.d00 Soo 67C '•:U IJ 159" i3 6S ]IS 51 RS 141 7i' 1016 434% B 720 17 65021 CRW4 Rvr�ulc:L:r:rf<t Raul US 41 I Tlminai ball Clurlm;aem BoAnard 44D 516 D W I100 1410 )air, -;u 33 19f" 55 R`b5 131 IF 14J 1173 617 651ti C '.JU I] 550_71 CRW,4 ? tc t:n'.�-�wl. iod thrirt-v-nc Hsiemd Camp Ham Read 4U 511 U W I-- J v4C Eau On 1216. 0 J! 16 78% i0R it 119 949 851 57-7': 0 740 17 65'i:l ,n R.ad 54L Bei.•Abe:.uJ In 5;4 D W I_ 6 79C ba in a. :4'1 le r NI 1U33 4A'. it 0 77 M16a - ,i6a.J<vaJ Karr ROOkveA 11) Fit F W 44 4W IV; 40 e w % II51 TIFF %1 A5 ,0 1 TU1 '_2M 24 IF B ILL 760 56 620618 sNs.`,arl 0,. Ltard SIFII Gat Pmkrr• !D 5'9 D R JI 041) IS ]II JIM IF 0 1270 C G 12J0 36D 5905.6 C 710 % Alin IA va tiv7ua n.).!�;, A"1 +alwae Raclin Rosd 6D 5'8 E Y 3.1' 17W 1110 14W 70 31i 54 0 54 1661 4 S4 1934 1166 624': C 71 IF 56 620E1,4 IS bPyM1va 3..��. FLA.;.:i..'evvd F � I_ II 1441 Im 741FF :13 It 211 1563 "I 121 Full 1A29 537: C 799 a10 5.029 liar6ae '.:..,. --- .-A< SR-n 'I. S 41 rTaurrmi Trail) Rlilanir-FWrnal. R.rd CR 33T/luts Streit Del IJ 615A D 5 Y Ot[v 9- 150 950 L33 60 --- `. 140 112 f{ it. 0 'CO2 da I3 D r IN 0 IOW 1Y7 2011 77p 351% 14A5G 0 B i10 SfC9 SR 19 CR t]La1n 5«u[Dtl 1-73 2C 615A D�' 7R5 90 Isla139 1'nl 0 6 0 I50 0 - 0 Ib 770 IJA % 0 CO SR39 SR 29 F75 047 W'rO Road 2L 615A D N 9&2 90 ISO IJ0 (11 a 6S';69 219 51 34 ILL As 115 633 237e B tl0 I S?_`i SR 29 100 We£, Road CR"A S6•m Ii 665A D K 900 7111a 410 AIO 0 01711% 0 Oo 6 410 54 30 4 J94 JEFF 549% C 940 SR19 SR 19 ,CR 14A 9auh 9m SOea 4D 664 D N' I,7 bfa AEG a 20 }J35 !1_ 0 12 612 94 37 13' 751 949 4'_': B 850 S'.Z'9 SR 29 9;h Sam CR_9A.`IoOh A' 663 D 5 900 620 620 6}] 10 Ibl' 21 0 2t 641 T- 24 96 T-6 174 207% D WO S1f_'9 SR 29 Ila29A Need; SRS2 '_U 6tl D S 9CO 620 6'_0 630 10 161•' 0 0 0 AM 11111 n 73 703 197 7&"a D /70 SR19 SR 29 Flawle, Ca vlire SR.. C. IL' 591A D S sw 350 Nil ITO 10 271Y 0 0 U 3511 7 4 11 SID 1 4191 47(11% B e10 SAC SR C Itc C:a+n Lim SR 19 2l` 661A D 5 SW 7;0 050 :4G 'M 1315" 8 0 e 658 41 17 SI 708 1 _ 991% E 2022 1019 91 0 tl 1'. S41 Tarquaw Trd EatfielesN Road 6D 545 E E 1560 I7C0 197_0 120 1194. 23 47 TC I7T0 114 1 2046 954 10 6% C 4211 i1 1'Si I am�I Trod Eu1 ce5 Road RaNes ake Ifautod Rand 6D Sol E E U40 2460 160 696' % 13 241 161 2561 1111 91 373 2933 67 97 7 i E 20'JI 010 46 I; 41 aril Ted Exit Raltie®La Usti t Revd Fronalitic Bodevard 6D r? F F 10W 1960 1360 Not SO A-L 19 341 2-704 If4l 151 437 2571 425 as 7 % D LILL IrttlAl lareviourayt Trinlle Hove red CQ&O smic wd TI E 16: V�7r 491 e 5 FIT fit 1141 R 953L I a9r iral tlYll aevarthg6Y11 Badeved I IiIB01'tae Gcmwar$ad hoe D "ID SOLI D E6 6 170 99C RS7% 22N 11 _74I53 F0161 I . *5 WS3 IS5'la 1.5 Si 116 B 641 561% C 1133 I1541 uni Tun Fie ftemw Read It slam Orire 1t! 609 D F 1015 670 TO V' S_'0 243r• 53 4 37 CIF H 1 85 1075 0 100P.e F 101_I 1 2019 960 1.1541 Torrouric iul Ew ista NimDOvc SR 29 2L 617A D E loan 14U 2114 (4i1; IF 111 F. 0 f 0 7_40 0 D 0 200 t00 1_0,0% H �0 U41 -mamiTrial la+ 'SR19 DoIc Cramp lies 2U 616A D E ICUC 150 110 1% I11) I"n5" 0 110 0,0 0 170 wo 171T: B 910 71 11541 tautami Tray Ram oAx Ca9uav L.p Nieets Pas Raid S46 E Y 310f IWF ?" ?'_SG I60 Tw;i 91 I',i 21Y5 39 R fit 2317 793 747% C Y1 O 30 1141 Tammot Treat \'ads l61 �s PaI Rr•ae Immdabe Rord 6U 564 E \' 3.1 2360 21% 30M JIG 3 211 29 .9 - _1T_] 16 JA 303J 66 97.7: E 2010 1020 1000 45 I U341 4uu Trail Nwlh famrlaiee Rtad \'silntuh f5r:h Rud AD 577 E V 3.104 ?zW ?3?0 1931 1 I00 I., :4,, 1! 0 i 133e 16 0 16 1936 1161 (L 5': C loin 45 1 U45 arrumt iral Yam 'Vale !; Red Road 4A9f Pak fh:sc 60 563 E Y 3.1 DWI2316 2IC0 110! $ 3 0 - 7777 1 0 1 2461 639 794% D 102 0 US41 Farm Trd 74mJr ali IK: Drre Piro R15ee Rood bD 562 E Y 3, b I lW1 19C0 1010 1 F0 ' 3 77' I9G7 0 X12 IOU 64 74 C I LUP h aim flnvt arc DnK L541 lramiaw Tcall M. 03 D E 4A6 Sf0 SIG 10 200"' At i7 9A 105 / 109 619 ill 71 N: D I09.0 42 65071 CRW2 VioxhaWl liab load Gufdea: Gs7e US Jt fTaaiaai treat 1U'ID 5'_A E E 1.400 410 9.v 0'; aIw 0 d d .•10' 0 0 990 410 7070: C 110.1 23 61011 CRI61 Va9dn631 Reach Read U541(iraiaaa Tralil Gad me Trail Road JD 6t6 D E 1 WM 1540 FAIL (I �L) -�<_-I'. 0 9 0' 1540 7 U 7 1497 413 ]46% C I101 67021 CR162 Yaa&rhi9(each Raw rorldklrcPraW Rawl AURrt Rud 40'60 666 D E 23W 1700 1760 1750 i'11 - 0 a a MO - 0 7 1757 741 103% C 111A 63 63051 CR861 Vu3abrb Burvat.ii jAa lR.ud LIOu mRra: AB 519 E W 1") 1410 Iwo co- 2b:+ 6 0 0 1910 1 ! 1964 IOM �I--IILIIII. 6545ILL C 1111 63 bJO1! CRW'_ VAMO617 Bolivia R.•w 14ve7 Row loaac Bhd 6D 41 E E 3, 20" 2150 ? M C 9 12 71 71 7141 e59 71,40% C I110 N 6MSi rIF Vndwhk Doh Road Rest Ca6v A@Uka d 60 510 E E 3 *A 1170 IM lm 1l0 Fr J9' '_E0 'i1 1791 � x3 '_SE 191! IOS! 61,95% C 1140 ?S 69061 C19D1 Ypdabd: Drive D®u Barb Raid N ai IFF But 2U 4e U N I.OW 420 4a0 An 9 10P' 31 35 475 1 _ 35 4H 516 4841; 0 1136 69061 CR701 Yahied;d: Pile StPau Rood 111'h Aeaa2 21' S73 D Y 10Wi 440 140 9 3 13 16 456 13 16 463 53S 465% H 1164 36 5421 N'cCrae Red Cation ROW SR 2% 2U 611 D 51' war MO 110 210 0 CCO" 0 0 0 1F0 0 4 1_l0 590 263% O 1170 111 CRtle ems Ass Rue Vi derbl2 Drive US At rfreirni 7raill 21: 669 D F I bMI 4m 430 439 9 1 13 16 446 17 13 Sri 469 "1 4676 B 1180 Wlhu Blvd ImmatYre Fluid cAdm Cnale Bakvud 2U 5SO D S AL 310 320 SAO 20 615'. 2A C 24 34 0 0 0 340 560 37e5: B 1190 6PAJ4 eRJsa dN'dl RIF 4tntwalte Raul Bmtcrri SD r53 D E 2AY74 600 TOD IY) 150 !145'.' 117 216 333 1033 315 d 2l7 1137 963 M90; C 12l'4 afYlt4 CRLe 'wdl Pod Evindat Bovivi4 Desco Boulevard 21- 694 B W' LIM 19 2M SSG 70 L4 roe' IS 21C 171 503 137 '-Cri 559 541 SO e': B fit Wen RI7J DcSde Hicausard Chi Well Gale 21` 64 0 SA' 1.1W 2W 350 :0 0 Sq 111 124 62 IW 536 564 is ri B 1211 I: N'cH RUA Oil Nei Grd< Are 51ui4 Blvd 4D 6W U W 7_ 00U IW ?i0 JSD 70 7_3 t+05' 0 _ 4M 124 61 I W SJb 1164 161% 9 1220 1 writ ROW .Ave Alain Bird SR S9 2U 694 D N' e00 2M 280 350 70 Le DV 0 65 65 345 116 54 170 SIG 29054B C 1230 &1 Oddest Caw Wilson Bairrard Ilat Sued YESE IL' 652 D E IOW 1102 119D as 1025: 0 0 1102 1' 5 15 11U5 1095B 1711 6=0 r Alen Gate O.attrvard IAh Sam YF6E rm14adalAruleted N:4D 657 D E 7_1C0 KIM 11 Ilw 88 5925' 0 0 1101 0 5 5 1193 :I05 3 1240 60040 Calla Lau Smlo d B Boulevard D6fao tlur. J '-1 SW D E 101 218 ±23 4 1. 0 0 0 2J 0 M 733 B1250 CR176 Prre Red Raw I.r .G•devad ,Lie 3,.:kntd 4D $35 D E 2.4% 1790 13'_U 1240 20 1515: 1 7 1 1122 6 7 7 :347 IQ553 CI IC RAId.41 Outlemd FoIwalilee Rod ESerOi45cs DztIFiv-ad '_L' 651 D E M0 I VIL 172 47 36 7 918 24 16 40 8M 40ILL E 2073 1-021I in Ras11i1Bodnad EvadaSo Bndnad CSCS.adL le.aN 1' ItAu D E bit 612 o39 13 20T 0 20 64 D a 634 261 C1340Eva Bwdevard 1-75 Crdden Gee Blvd _'L' 637S U S 3:� JIO 430 /- 10 4655• 0 430 0 ISO 3SO C13111 C sDadsrad Gm lhedned IN'eD Rod 2U 4J65 D 6)G 31 210 310 700715" 16 33 36 316 lA! 15 l55 145 BI16 Evxdde Boad[v ad N'SD 11aY 7ladala Rod 7L6355 D 390 tin 450 \0 9'65 n 0 410 0 0 450 CFiatL)] Boulevard 1.75 �iliAdm lino Ba.krud 2L• 6391 D 1 140 1 10 TJJ.' 0 0 0 1Act 0� 0 O I40 650 B TWO BraASvsd aOAa BSer6cr4rd 9A WelRm1 2U 63IA V 4V:w I 190 110 IO IJ 0 100 I 0 e 111 6e'1 54 R5: B IF" ee Bbesaa Drive =vcl Rod Rod 2D At 0 540 4r II10'; _ _ i a I 555 19 O 19 JI9 781 347• 0 1430 llkw.t Den+ LV=Rm1 ,IAS Rod 1-l' 641 D r 54 1' IIt6, Ati 0 AJ SW 46 0 A6 4J4 554 J465. B 1440 nrdvaba: Dave LS II ITamlam T.�R1 'Dais Hodcvad 2L 523 D 1_30 230 O OI1T• 0 0 0 270 0 0 0 2Y5 570 IE IS: B ua6; �n .car=r.rzro=zct61a+4zr6lrn P O_ N 0) N Ail .,mrMmt"F' CeOitr Cwery' 2916 {sauai L'pbR ud Iwealon Nems IAL I R114sd m .tdopltd ILS,Trip Ru\ ad fn4Rc (Jws 2016 M17 2015 21117 MI 2417 MIS Trailer ISIh Trip Peak Hoer peak Peak Pak MIX 111111 ID17 U7111 Vital 2013 V111 L91k I Cast Bank Peak Dir Hear Haar Han Amd Pnml M11 Ill Tort L1911 TH SOU 1/:11 Taped 1Rt\To iota L Year VcAr Elio CeL Mn Pink Stl Pnk Dk Feak Dix Peak O4r Var-aeons Varioles Trip Trip Trip Nil Trip Trap Trip 2011 Remm 17111 TH 0 Expected Expected IN CIEII Pruitt Rai" Ibk irm To Wad Sta Stl our Valaa Velas. V.l Vital To Va6a To Va\rat ask w k al Volume `\ auk Rank Veinal recall VAC Al Delml i fMfrkal 10 99910 CR2i Read �mdds Road Vapdoh)t Dean Law 41) S31 D N 7_2W L 12u1 1220 �11 -I nl•. ID IG i?50 73 ] � LIS 955 SL P. C 21 55 67�31 CYI Rul Yande6r7 BsA Read Drrrs Bbme Drier 6D S99 E � ilw6 IOM 1970 1110 116�1 .YI" f 7C 94] 0 66 IClb 1121 i35: C 55 672P31 CR31 AiyWRW 1Hoaat.r Ornc Pm Ridee Rod 6D SM E N 70W ISM lt6n rm 11911 494'. on f 9J 1454 V 0 s41 Itil 1176 60 P. C 10 39 60f21 auI RW Rd Read inMal Gast Ps67ra 60 502 E IN 30ffi Fm 00 2330 150 17 Am 1 7 19a1 IJ .35 147 '[ 656 7a I% D L0 99906 CR31 Ai RW Galbm (ra Pak Rohe Read 6D 531 E 2a00 Mae 2290 2310 V Oa79' It If =rOt P_ 0 2732 J6a 113'.: D 2CIU f.0 7 66011 CR31 Ainsul Read R4da Read Davis Boulevard 6D 557 E \ 2t00 2010 2IW 22W =110 6.1 17 17 7_I it II 11 »41 559 !00% D b0 3 NDJ I fRll Retl Dees ilmiewd US 47 lTaadeiToll 6D ST_ F. S 27x 1590 I610 I650 A?Js': l0 IC 16V 73 2 75 1T7S 415 NY: C 70 argil Odve US /I ITntYri Tsl71 alab)m Drive JD T_I 77,s Itil 600 Wo 620 45 a 45 e95 116 i 1121 738 IOi /1m H DO 31 6l CR 663 Omits Beach Rued Wa dS'aderSk Drive Flcknv Omkad 4D 653 D F I9W 1050 1970 low III),I 0 0 0 Illy] 0 0 0 1060 NO 3535.4 C 90 Oram ROW Tn9lyd Read Iml-Drive7_U 610 D I N N;4 310 320 330 101 3130: 0 0 0 323 ol 0 0 330 2701 530% C 100 33 60101 !lea Crams Hamd Dows Bnelnrd RsNrsnuc!lamrut ROW 211 519 D S 9]D lie 37A m V I6425. 65 0 65 391 123 1 124 504 396. 56C. C 110 99912 CRM CRM US 4l lianiamI Tm4i EvoWales City 211 Sa2,t D S L000 IW 190 160 -I'- D FA 0 :90 0 n 4 160 140 16 Ol B 120 SRS4 Dew 3adnad U5111TaermI T.-W) A:ryral Reed 6D 552 E E 27W 1320 1550 161D rU 381l 33 0 33 1SE 56 4 56 16" 1034! 617: C 130 42 M1161 SR64 DnW Boldevud .tkmlRW Lakeaad Boulevard 4D SfS D E 2 1350 i5W ISaD 53Y I J ISW 0 0 15Y1 42A' 790% D 140 49 W161 SRII Dews BoWewrd LYnrmd &v'evrd Cool Han Revd JD 65a D E 2000 1530 1610 Ill 60 373% 61 4 61 117t 61 C 61 1731 269 366: D 2m ISA a3 60I61 SR14 +9 em k,ed m Her RAad 1rlu Barba Bavkrad AD 5?7 D F _Xf I4y1 1460 _ 1- 144 IU t914 Iw 196 1066 W TSh i) I6.1 It {IW iLiwkmd Rat 560 Dt E 3 L 650 740 57l 21 -I is 163 sea 96 1i� _5 162 R3 S7174 DavivP kvwd RaCrs Road Cdikr B9vlcwrd 6D 601 OF. W 33M 1040 Ir1W 11'dl 1?D 341 1141 Its 132a 11 214 296 1414 IRt4 4299< B 170 62 63041 CR976 Laden Crane Hmkmd 'filer tlr,irod WIHM Hmkvad t0 531 D E I"ll I6010 1710 110, 6ta" 4 11 t low 0 at 11 1710 590 743'i C Ian 99913 CRLt6 den Gal Partial US 4ltitnoaai final Frasl Rol 6D 530 E E 170C Mo L70 12301 0 1 oom 13 13 1743 :3 of 13 1243 1457 44)'. U Mo 5 GOM7C CWs6 Lae Postural RAW Ancient Read 6D 567 E E 1,3'yj Z710 Tto 2930 2": Itr^ 5 5 2115 S 0 5 MIS 365 tt 9!: D 2014 2D 1 74 61I1306 CRff6 ilea Cx1e Prkrw Read 3vierml Read 6D 50f E E 3 371 2310 27110 7290 90 t 4 W, 0 ] C 774D 1? 0 12 no 9" 69 Suii 212 74 W006 CRatb Gar FY\a 't6 Rod 475 6D 691 E E J J93 Tmo 2610 1w, -i 76'. I 1 2R1 D 0 0 2610 690 79.1% 210 74 OU27 CRtt6 dent Frka 1-73 Saw B�hm Bu.derad 60 509 E E 3300 19R1 1960 2140 140; Sir I4 R Is 1974 14 0 14 :354 1146 65 J`.: 220 99916 CRat6 e4Ja Ga411rk" oBillR.-,'r.rd Cdkc Roca rvl 40 605 D E IWO NSO 1550 1610 60' 3ai1' 6 6T 16i7 43 a SI 1"1 139 923•: to 2423 2 0 19 6f041 CRaSI voila!;_ -Fmk Read �R-ad ;Vjuuk lBeady Read if[ 394 D V 'I ow m im un tilt; 1"y IIF�°, IS IS 945 1 0 a66 134 a6h% 2a16 241 61 60134 CRS51 Gwd1CL'4-nnk Rat: Vandahli Barn F.w lom"Versus Drive aD 545 E Y 1340 1350 1370 _m• 1 73 1 73 1413 73 0 77 1441 9S/ 6).i•. 242 65 60134 CRa51 G"akec-Trot Read R� Dl mRWs R:r! !GddenC 6D 531 E N 7_a00 Inc 1550 1 170j /_A5' 0 0 I5S0 0 I6M 720 T37: C 250 p 60304 CR651 Gmelerc.Fraak Rm Rae Rda Rmd cPsi 6D 503 E V 7 ILrO IaSO 77' 3i01 174P' 0 Ill 0 22A 7W 740`. C 360 •A917 CRa51 C Y.lmt-frmk Rand dden tore Park 1135 JI(Tam4.nr Toll 60 504 E Y M50 21% '_480 d90 1121 11 'ISO 0 D 24t0 =0 91 T.: D 2(m =3 270 67 66055 ways Bwkrad Sacy Ba6aa 0wicrud 'Calla 3•alnvd 2U 641 D E P_0 710 6m ISU) 0 730 0 6w 220 756% D _r9,0 6K311 GWbhac Uin Ills.\coax 1Vanda6it �t Rail it' SCIs D N 2M 235 17_0 1171-(�,_•. TIS 0 0 270 SIO P4: O MI T7 655061 (Iml Cdbw fkx:kwrd Irnmulkake R.'aal 1 Vanrmbr'1 Beach Rand 60 555 E \ 3sS1 14W 1520 than ILO 10 273 R4 4J'. 1Sb7 419 179 447 n77 773 74211 C 301 37 65061 CR931 COArr boll 1'aVtah6 Bmrfi Rod Gddm Cue Boulevard 6D 5" E S t'90 I VS) 02M 0 Goal 43 li 1306 39 ill 13341 166' 44 6se D 311 $3 tool CR931 Cd'i1CDo-.krW der Gott Out It P1nc Rid=Rear) 6D S36 D \ 3 !367 1904 17M !I'1'.I r`.I- I6 V 19.6 48 M lass 1142 61'P: C 311 S5 La056 CR951 C�ri:s cloil ud Pun Wdee Rued 'Grten [i::L-v aN 6D Sib D N 3 'a67 1904 I7M II7 '.I I7 U 19:a ik be INC IInc b13`: C 32.1 76 63067_ CIMI Ca ha l6ukwrd Cams Hskrrd 'Sia:Jc, Ciax'lrkv a0 P5 D \ 13N 1410 IY50 903 63ar 77 0 1437 27 0 27 017 773 Ill C ]2T 76 tiN360 7R951 Cti 4a E.�11kraN Cidas Gape P.kT iraWrn Luc 54a Caa JD 667 D 2300 ILr6 126G i}T1 110 a73 13 Iw 7_13 1475 15 li 217 IWi 713 M.0% C 323 76 6SOS6B CR'751 Cnha Pc l;.�vJ Gkddvl Cale Ate" Cad 475 tD 607 E \ 3.6W Mo 1260 1170 lie! a.7A: IS 253 312 1573 66 2_aI 324 foil 1906 VIl 0 330 61 6W93 SR95i C.+h:r [3clkuad 1.75 Oaws9mil arJ 1D 573 E \ 3, 3210 2500 2960 140` 4r6•: 17_ 2J7 359. 31791. 13 2n 290 P30 3TC 903% D 2024 NO 96 bowl CR951 Who bostenrd Dew H6We71N Raaklrale Haarr"t DD 602 E \ 3.060 1490 14W 1660 2Y1 la S^.. ;41 217 i16'. 111R 209 247 306 2166 a)1 C 350 16 60001 CR951 ,O3 guilewmd R4alervLe l6naud Red U341 fTaniasiT 71 to 603 E Y 32 17M IS60 1900 40. 215•. 1 243 347. [93 It] 338 2235 WE N19K C 161 12 wAl SRAI d6rr i3wJerud [i% 411Taa:arl Trill W'al-WS Driverar 60 557 E N 23m 1391 1300 IN 30 _'c0^_ itJ 1N 7'L9' 111 127 231 176/ 732 70.7% C 362 SR451 Wli>Iknkvad Wa4Na7fVnea Vlaaee ROW JD S57 D H 2 17N 17 15M tel 1371 I•;C6. /73 IM 2_77 1757 2:! ✓n 4% D 2W6 370 12 64UI SR951 Mier Dxkmd tiaRtee R.ad \Liu 1Dull 4D 6_17 D \ ISNI 1670 I:m li(. 5• % 0 iO3 le)' i?'3 ea 163 171 1941 2" M2% D M?4 780 51 66241 4R951 cow, Multiplied ;,Giavl Unre Vkrty ldsnl Dr:fn 4D 6'7 D N ,700 It60 1670 1770 Illy 5911: 31 )I' IvI 0 31 31 ill 3" 819% D =11 39.0 6J 9N01 CRa46 II IIk .tvm=N Gellih„re ^wn VarrJer6r%Dniv 2U $25 D E 3W 3C 30fi 2W,vs Oi Jolt C 306 "a 437/. R 400 1 6W31 C?la6 It IM Aill ;l'rn.'t>ht Drive US 31/ Tamceni Trail 71 613 D - 9W W) 430 / •) ) o: 4M1 0 0 449 461 4as: 11 411 6 66p72 CRS46 oaskJlee RW '[' S 41 lTarrilmi Toll amil Vol Road do ME E W 3,1 1910 2610 2040 - 3AIR Jt 7 11� 2971; )75 133 M55 565 727•i C 412 6 6l CRa46 Iaeuialea Red l5o.Arec.Fink ROW nnrn R.-.uf 60 1625 E - J.IW 37J1 2Sr0 C+:' 11 J J; '_6111 35 6 2675 43 1631: D 2027 2023 : 421 6 66W2 CfW6 Imnr6akeRW ai .R..v7 irieusro7 Aad 6D 567 E W 3.1 2790 2790 290C Ilc 3949' S 7 S 2A5 7 2907 193 93■ti: D Vn 2071 42 2 6 660i2 (Rua hna"Ja4vRW tnra Lr R.ad F75 FV FD o E E 3_3W 7160 2460 25K 11tj 4I0'. 3 29. 24" 1 49 49 3629 :1 75 i% D 73 1 t 66045 CR916 Imm•Aaec Real 1-75 I Oaddctad 6D'F❑ 569 IF 3.= 2410 N M% I 1" 345, 'JC3 ! 41C 176 54D 7_970 $30 649: D 2➢73 412 CRt46 I:r•r.,cItl Read L B&x:4vrd aKe Badevva to 656 E 31 1960 t910 102C 40: 2Q°' 557 SaS, 33(5' 711 Hi 992 3017_ IN l D 2021 410 71 60012 CRa46 limm�sa'ctRW Cdka 4k.'4vrd Wilscr BodevW 60 674 E E 73 1620 1620 177C 1501 9?6Y _7f2 7_65 517' 21I,7 6J3 216 W9 2619 621 '19.49: D I 450 71 60019 CH946 Immn-•9•RW Wdtea tle.aa5re oil Rrad 60 675 E E 3_ IOO 1a90 2u2L I?0' 6Mm. 1224 '95 429• :319; 2'/6 93 3" 24" B91 73 of C 460 73 60165 C1U46 h19n1iske Had OJ We➢RW SR'_9 2U 6T_ D E `SOO 370 390 41C a: 513" IQ 131' S7_I 12_7 46 16a 578 327 6l C 470 W 99607 LLe Tslfad Rod Cersa Rd SR 24 2U 6ry 0 100 170 470 Si{ _ 676!- ]a 31 SLi' 41 J 51 SSf '_inr452*w C Jt0 60766 !.7 3ndnui YaNahk Rmrh Wed Rrr Rdea Rod LU 517 D \ 1 614 710 6H 1 1 3s; 7a3 IJ 1 3) 707 297 C 49.0 fin$[ Hmrkrrrd Flee Rmd Greer Basin 45 Sla D S 13 mu 15-m IGIC 40 235:- 0 Ot IFM C thin 290 D '_023 V23 S00 79 60166 acuirrrd Interstitial Wad Veil 0e Beach Rod 2L' 644 D Y IVol 590 me 5x 111 1m 30 30, 3w 29 619 371 C 7:0 21 65611 CAtti Lwncrm Road ka6eril SVeet kasaisimea Read S4D f 67) D N 3 IIW IIO 126C• f0 b7P' 99: 1279 61 0 61 ILI 16" H 320 57 62071 CRIai LrtrnOkrt RW lintwiaw Raw Vaniki lRealr Evil 66 ! T76 F Y 3.IW IND f610 Ill V IM!' 0 7/; I"I 7a 0 9 166a 1432 C 53 0 V 62071 CIW I L: m Read 'aauk[Oih Bush Read Piet RI Read 61) 375 E 5 3.1 W 14- 1480 J<r 14 OIa1'- 1 l Is: 1499 4 0 J 1491 I606 R 60071 CRAI L,v� nRcd Pl Ri Read - Gve?wLuw 6D 690 E N, 3.IW 11: 14W ISA he Oar ?4 34 1561 46 0 ib 1576 /S_4 B 330 33 60061 CRI61 Lvinaum Real Gelder Gar: lixtvv Ran Rmd 6D 637 E \ 3,OW 1 ILV laV; b 472!- G 39' 13M s 1 1371 1662 R \m Nafa Rued 5R-291 ill Saxal 7L' 590 D \ - 630 40 fi r 0 3"➢ II 656 7_H590 �'ea 6lakl Read fkwrd Suva SRM 2Ci 612 D E T!0 590 20 351•' 0; 570 [6 S IS 605 795 C fi10 36 Kees Cal Wd Read kreaAkske Rod 2l: 6_r6A D S I. !W V 36 N'" 101 IRS! 29a 132 TO '_04 761 536 1612: 9 670 64 99905 CRlaf (,S 41 Lee Crml line 1:%411 Ticel TraU 'U "1 D \ I. 9Ad IOSO 14r10 7J7 19fP T 3T: FM7 w 40 1110 I,H1 IIIR': Ervin Eiri W67ER basonrer-rnelwn,e7ara TURN LANES •CURBED AND UNCURBED MEDIANS Design Speed (mph) Entry Speed Imphi Clearance Distance L. URBAN CONOfTlONs RURAL CONOtrioNS Brake ToFTTolaf Stop Distancece L t Clearance Distance Lr Brake To Stop D+stanCE ro:al Decel. Distance L Clearance Distance L, 35 25 70 75 143 110 -- — 40 30 80 75% 1551 110 -- --- -- - 45 35 65 - 100 IRS 155 -- — 50 aDf44 105T 135' 240 I 1850 790 l6fi 55 48 1251 --- 225' 35L 73S 60 52 145% 260 +CS' 230 65 55 170 290 4p� 270 DESIGN NOTES 1 Basis to: turn lane [onr,yura:iun5' • Informed Driver. • stop condition !With Or W,thta,t Stoll Controil. • Wet Pavement. • Reacfio.n preredi.'rg Pnrry paint. • Minimum bra1mg dfstarkr f?r urban ,-ondn)ons. • 7S min for lr • Comfortable deceleration rates for rural cond.tinns IAASWO 2001 threshold rate of 11.2 f• 15'). GENERAL NOTES i. The plan Fleas sh;nn are for ;urn lane !uper shapes ap•At drnvnsAenaf purovses only 'hey all � prescn to the use ar carp ;urb ana pater. shoviuers for feparators svecifgca'ly to either :ura) or urban foWrtians 2. Total oecelerat ran dr5l drk'es .M st rot be reclined except rchrre lesser rallies are irtpeseD by ✓nrelof ateMe contra pw nts. 3. Right :urn lane raprrs atM dr s[axes �aen:icar rc ilit iu•n fr,Es wr�4r scup control condibpo; Right turr rang faF,crs 8nd/pr i+STJnies are site speb P.f under /r%� Poo or yidD conL Dons q These Ielf rprn rorfrguratiars apply to ccntrruous ref/ turn lanes .,n1y ahem sretoIically called for .n trz ,clans �c:X'El2 Curb Or (Reis/ r 5. For paverenr marsrrrgs see ! aer Yo_ 17315. Umrts or �, 6 or LAmAts of Y, 6 0- 8-5- Traffic 8-6 Tratfi: -Ede 0f Tun, Lane - Edges 0f rirrr, !one 9 - Separator �- 5r araar Edge Of pwl. r� -- - Edge Of Pa.r. I rTurhed Serf+on! Cursed Serfronl t � ortCurti r Gel. 7r Curti AfJ ,'z.lr �: 'Refer To cider' No 300) TYPE E CURB AND GUTTER TYPE F t:mrfs of 4, 6' v Limits of s, S or I.nnr-c nt a 6' or 6-60 rralfrc r - Edge Of 9-6 Traffic a-6-Traff•r Turn Lane Separator 5eoararar $epararcr 1, -- EAoe 0` Turn -,1 Fagg Of rurr• - Edge Of Part - Lane And Fdge - tare Ara Edge f !Curbed Scctrc•d Cf Pad Cr Farr TYPE A TYPE B TYPE D CURB for Lufb And Curb S 6utrei ry,ves. See lroer No 300 A optrcn ; Secaratrs sn"Pi inefer to lade} No i02i MEDIAN CURB AND TRAFFIC SEPARATOR JUNCTURE DETAILS Corrrxe Curb Jr fv'b A,11 Gui:Er Refer To 1?der Ya 3r:01 - J Sego Ga.'re Lve Lr Or!•nea:or 'ost !Refer Tv lode. Nr 1>>-= Ara ':_.., Li J taper 700 � jj� — Beg,.n Lave lire r - Be,'pn Lane ! rueJe Leryth ' I (}fedSL'Ied FrUT. $+op Lxa:ron) drakes App/fell firer Turning I vehr'.re hears rn.wgrA Lane- —� FLUSH AND/OR CURBED SEPARATION Enl.} 5oeed- /0 mph 5elcw Design Speed For Orton Ccnd,t,cr Traffi[ Separator (Refer Arerape RurrrirV Speed r or R;irar Canditior To lncer .40 302) 10J I — Begtn Lane Line sE_:= .l - L _ 7:re.e iengrh - L _ — i!+ensured Frcm stop Braces +ppbee After Turn;-,g VehglE 'tears Throlgh are; —mow RAISED SEPARATION En:ry Saeed- 17 rpn Be:oa Design Speed For Jroan Cuna,l.o.'. A:crge Rpnn•rg Speed F.-r Rura! Coroiricn DOUBLE LEFT TURNS Dehheatnr Post lriefer To fai No- 17i46) -. L Lschali Parr. _ 1 $t.ap 3dr (!f Required) - 6raies {py.lrrd Atie: lUrn:.'.'j � 0•�£Je Cemd:F, fs ped5wr� F'ar}Tir_ Mepfaa .4ose aaorar Pwx D'..er_!1 .! Srop Si' /s aequ`rei. ' � The Stno Rar. Vehirre 'lea•s "hrnign Syr, $peep fLUSN ANO/OR CURBEO SEPARATION /0 ,pn RNoa Owen 5aeeg Fo- broac 40rdrf.enseoara'er !Refer 4rerage Runniig Speed Far Rurd Condincii To [•odor No. 3021 J condition Taper 7O Lore LAne Stop Bar !!f Requved) - B'akEs spplied .4trr Tur.+rrg ) VPv� �E __'+ELs 7hr Jupr �JnE. Ea-•y s,eear RAISED SEPARATION 10 .mph 8erarc Design Speed fpl Urcd,� pve,age Rurning Sneer For Rulel Condl[IOn SINGLE LEFT TURNS The 'cngtll of tdoer May ve ,r:lea5ed IL ! for 5i„ite /ef' furris arc L for double lCfr mrn5 rthen' a Left furn q.rele :?+,ic•" are e'�Xel} .rrr:.+ed for nilivp the resrun que..e leryfn t Tbl Ougn yCrule gc�ue5 alit •m�' LIO;r acres to left let , Id+:e_ r Ap Gfu:ed bf D:5lrl1f /Design Era+deer aevlsloN FY 2017-18 07/07/05 � F� �? DESIGN STANDARDS TURN I.A11iFis INDEX Corrrxe Curb Jr fv'b A,11 Gui:Er Refer To 1?der Ya 3r:01 - J Sego Ga.'re Lve Lr Or!•nea:or 'ost !Refer Tv lode. Nr 1>>-= Ara ':_.., Li J taper 700 � jj� — Beg,.n Lave lire r - Be,'pn Lane ! rueJe Leryth ' I (}fedSL'Ied FrUT. $+op Lxa:ron) drakes App/fell firer Turning I vehr'.re hears rn.wgrA Lane- —� FLUSH AND/OR CURBED SEPARATION Enl.} 5oeed- /0 mph 5elcw Design Speed For Orton Ccnd,t,cr Traffi[ Separator (Refer Arerape RurrrirV Speed r or R;irar Canditior To lncer .40 302) 10J I — Begtn Lane Line sE_:= .l - L _ 7:re.e iengrh - L _ — i!+ensured Frcm stop Braces +ppbee After Turn;-,g VehglE 'tears Throlgh are; —mow RAISED SEPARATION En:ry Saeed- 17 rpn Be:oa Design Speed For Jroan Cuna,l.o.'. A:crge Rpnn•rg Speed F.-r Rura! Coroiricn DOUBLE LEFT TURNS Dehheatnr Post lriefer To fai No- 17i46) -. L Lschali Parr. _ 1 $t.ap 3dr (!f Required) - 6raies {py.lrrd Atie: lUrn:.'.'j � 0•�£Je Cemd:F, fs ped5wr� F'ar}Tir_ Mepfaa .4ose aaorar Pwx D'..er_!1 .! Srop Si' /s aequ`rei. ' � The Stno Rar. Vehirre 'lea•s "hrnign Syr, $peep fLUSN ANO/OR CURBEO SEPARATION /0 ,pn RNoa Owen 5aeeg Fo- broac 40rdrf.enseoara'er !Refer 4rerage Runniig Speed Far Rurd Condincii To [•odor No. 3021 J condition Taper 7O Lore LAne Stop Bar !!f Requved) - B'akEs spplied .4trr Tur.+rrg ) VPv� �E __'+ELs 7hr Jupr �JnE. Ea-•y s,eear RAISED SEPARATION 10 .mph 8erarc Design Speed fpl Urcd,� pve,age Rurning Sneer For Rulel Condl[IOn SINGLE LEFT TURNS The 'cngtll of tdoer May ve ,r:lea5ed IL ! for 5i„ite /ef' furris arc L for double lCfr mrn5 rthen' a Left furn q.rele :?+,ic•" are e'�Xel} .rrr:.+ed for nilivp the resrun que..e leryfn t Tbl Ougn yCrule gc�ue5 alit •m�' LIO;r acres to left let , Id+:e_ r Ap Gfu:ed bf D:5lrl1f /Design Era+deer aevlsloN FY 2017-18 07/07/05 � F� �? DESIGN STANDARDS TURN I.A11iFis INDEX L _ 7:re.e iengrh - L _ — i!+ensured Frcm stop Braces +ppbee After Turn;-,g VehglE 'tears Throlgh are; —mow RAISED SEPARATION En:ry Saeed- 17 rpn Be:oa Design Speed For Jroan Cuna,l.o.'. A:crge Rpnn•rg Speed F.-r Rura! Coroiricn DOUBLE LEFT TURNS Dehheatnr Post lriefer To fai No- 17i46) -. L Lschali Parr. _ 1 $t.ap 3dr (!f Required) - 6raies {py.lrrd Atie: lUrn:.'.'j � 0•�£Je Cemd:F, fs ped5wr� F'ar}Tir_ Mepfaa .4ose aaorar Pwx D'..er_!1 .! Srop Si' /s aequ`rei. ' � The Stno Rar. Vehirre 'lea•s "hrnign Syr, $peep fLUSN ANO/OR CURBEO SEPARATION /0 ,pn RNoa Owen 5aeeg Fo- broac 40rdrf.enseoara'er !Refer 4rerage Runniig Speed Far Rurd Condincii To [•odor No. 3021 J condition Taper 7O Lore LAne Stop Bar !!f Requved) - B'akEs spplied .4trr Tur.+rrg ) VPv� �E __'+ELs 7hr Jupr �JnE. Ea-•y s,eear RAISED SEPARATION 10 .mph 8erarc Design Speed fpl Urcd,� pve,age Rurning Sneer For Rulel Condl[IOn SINGLE LEFT TURNS The 'cngtll of tdoer May ve ,r:lea5ed IL ! for 5i„ite /ef' furris arc L for double lCfr mrn5 rthen' a Left furn q.rele :?+,ic•" are e'�Xel} .rrr:.+ed for nilivp the resrun que..e leryfn t Tbl Ougn yCrule gc�ue5 alit •m�' LIO;r acres to left let , Id+:e_ r Ap Gfu:ed bf D:5lrl1f /Design Era+deer aevlsloN FY 2017-18 07/07/05 � F� �? DESIGN STANDARDS TURN I.A11iFis INDEX 011 '!O 301 1 of 1 Impact Fee Calculator -Complete Building Use: (vlulti-Family Apts. And Guest House Location: Collier County Fire District: Greater Naples Fire Living Area ?er Unit: 1200 of Stories: Z.00 # of Units: 364 Total Area per Unit: 1400 Water and sewer impact fees are NOT INCLUDED. Please see fee schedule or call 239-252-6237. _ Estimated Impact Fees Cost Impact Fee Emergency Medical Services Fire Government Buildings Jails Law Enforcement Library Parks Regional Parks Community Roads Schools Total Fee Cost S24,570.00 $112,11200. $161, 594.16 $83,323.24 $107,947.84 $58,159.92 $4471807.36 $165,69 Z.80 ;.2,Q17,Z47.96 $11035,285.16 $4, 213, 740.44 Disclaimer:This calculator was designed as a tool to enable an applicant to estimate impact fees, The impact fee rates provided are consistent with the adopted Impact Fee Ordinance. There are many factors that may affect the total assessment, including determination of land use and credits for previous structures. Estimates derived from this module shall not substitute for the final fees calculated by County staff. Water and Sewer Impact Fees are not included in these calculations. Please see fee schedules or call 239-252-6237. Impact Fee Calculator -Complete Building Use Location Fire District Living Area Per Unit # of Units Total Area per Unit Single -Family Detached Collier County Greater Naples Fire 1400 150 1600 Water and sewer impact fees are NOT INCLUDED. Please see fee schedule or call 239-252-6237 Estimated Impact Fees Cost Impact Fee Emergency Medical Services Fire Government Buildings Cost $21,310.50 $sz,soo.00 $140,151.00 Jails $74,878.50 Law Enforcement $88,042.50 Library $50,407.50 Parks Regional S404,148.00 Parks Community $140,074.50 00 Roads i1,116,598.50 Schools $1, 318,431.00 Total Fee $3,406,842.00 I Disclaimer.This calculator was designed as a tool to enable an applicant to estimate impact fees. The impact fee rates provided are consistent with the adopted Impact Fee Ordinance. There are many factors that may affect the total assessment, including determination of land use and credits for previous structures. Estimates derived from this module shall not substitute for the final fees calculated by County staff. Water and Sewer Impact Fees are not included in these calculations. Please see fee schedules or call 239-252-6237. Impact Fee Calculator -Complete Building Use: Location: Fire District: Living Area Per Unit: of Stories: # of Units: Total Area per Unit: Multi -Family Apts. And Guest House Collier County Greater Naples Fire LZ00 2.00 140 1400 Water and sewer impact fees are NOT INCLUDED, Please see � schedule or call 239-252-6237 _ Estimated Impact Fees Cost Impact Fee Cost Emergency Medical Services $9,450,00 Fire $43,120600 Government Buildings $62 151.60 Jails $32,047.40 Law Enforcement $411518.40 Library $22,369.20 Parks Regional $172,233.60 Parks Community $63,728900 Roads 77864.60 Schools $398,186960 Total Fee $11620,669.40 Disclaimer:This calculator was designed as a tool to enable an applicant to estimate impact fees. The impact fee rates provided are consistent with the adopted [mpact Fee Ordinance. There are many factors that may affect the total assessment, including determination of land use and credits for previous structures. Estimates derived from this module shall not substitute for the final fees calculated by County staff. Water and Sewer Impact Fees are not included in these calculations. Please see fee schedules or call 239-252-6237. -..{`P� k�- �� - ,� b � ,�"` Y "'11''� x cy . �a 1i .�� ii�eif �' n�� T�i. � a'''' r ..-�?��' � �; t �'r '°'aF "yam:. •�.� , �� .�-� e� "e e r r .. �� Y-_� ,�� K �; �� . ./'�,r-=61,' € i*��-�1, t � r�,� _ _ � � ,'��y��j�'F�, -,ep, �3y.{hrre ��ttt'�t �y � .�y y�i~ }AF .� z' � 1 _ 3�:fi�.�. •_3 iki' �� `. �s�y -'tit �� L �,�� ('i �' � _ y ._ ��'-`�� ' a k�s{ 'e �' � 'l 1' 4 .. t� 1 � ti f., 4ew �. 1.+� M �`i � y� � � ti l -- �--� s :fir r-'.�, ,'�.��k�" - -�'=� r, .� � - � _- � - -- - � y - v - - r, t - .y. .,f � 1 �;� -,�,: �-- ti ¢ P--' {` �a►i`�.e 1� �SM '�: h �� , • � �. r I �� -��: . �, _ _ �- c� a �, r�ry, =� s � _', FEB 24 �2 011, MiL.:.:, dAHTON, DLL d PEE141,yC, -:z . h�. - '7.� 4� - ' +' ,r. tL � Yr +, � '��.� ,.� ._ r ,f �e ��, k • �- �trL � e-i � t � v -; �`i 6 ��t�1 ,.: ��r ��.�. iAMMOCK ROAD `°"' THE ROOKERY L,T,D AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH VEGETATIVE INVENTORY KNT NpF SEC.Sifi E$ So 9�R.26 E. Cq.l1iR ^_JURY. ....... ,Y ,, .>_...1 d E a N O C r m D 0 PUD WATERFORD ESTATES A PUD A 10' MIN. TYPE "A" FOR SF NAPLES 15' MIN. TYPE "B" FOR MF HERITAGE GOLF AND COUNTRY CLUB 2324' isso AIRPARK 10' MIN. TYPE "D" 10' MIN. TYPE "A" FOR SF NORTH BUFFER 15' MIN. TYPE "B" FOR MF 623' LO 7:c:�E IngresA (TBD atcn 10'MIN. TYPE "A" FOR SF 15'MIN. TYPE "B" FOR MF 0 m D PARCEL16A o z n 6.06 ACRES v'. ', m I ST 660 — — ............... _......... rn O C m NON ST O 10' MIN. TYPE "A" FOR SF- 15' MIN. TYPE "B" FOR MF RPUD ONYX LEGEND — — EXISTING SIDEWALK REC: RECREATION AREA P: PRESERVE (REF:LDC 3.05.07.13) OPUD DEVIATION PRESERVE SETBACKS PRINCIPAL STRUCTURES 2SFEET ACCESSORY STRUCTURES 10 FEET I�1 SHADOWWOOD SUBDIVISIONS PB PAGE 11 SHADOWWOOD 19 78-79 -21 SHADOWWOOD VILLAS 23 86-87 -31 REPLAT OF SHADOWWOOD PARK 25 95-99 WING SOUTH AIRPARK EXT 61 20-21 SHADOW PUD MASTER PLAN SUMMARY DESCRIPTION ACREAGE DWELLING UNITS TRACTS A & E - RESIDENTIAL 117.65± 558 TRACT B 5.68± 16 TRACTC-SINGLE-FAMILY 41.78± N/A RESIDENTIAL ENTRANCE DRIVE 3.00± N/A TOTALS 168.1± 574 GROSS DENSITY 3,41 UNITS/ACRE PRESERVE 3.8ACRES±PER RZ-59 REVISIONS 9/2/19 REVISED PER RAI #3 10/23/19 REVISED PER RAI #4 10/28/19 REVISED PER ENVIR. STAFF 11/25/19 REVISED PER PLANNING STAFF 11/27/19 REV, PER LANDSCAPE REVIEW 12/02/19 REV, PER LANDSCAPE REVIEW 0 TRACT E P 653' (2 AC.±) 16 15' MIN. TYPE "B" BUFFER 15' MIN. TYPE "B" BUFFER 15MIN. TYPE "B" BUFFER RSF-3 PUD HOMES OF ISLANDIA 91 10 16 ■ 15 CFPUD LASIP CONSERVATION AREA .10' MIN. TYPE "A" FOR SF 15' MIN. TYPE "B" FOR MF I RSF-4 193 TRACT C RSF-4 WING SOUTH AIRPARK VILLAS 0 3 P REC� P c: LAKE TRACT A 20' MIN. TYPE "D" dl L BUFFER RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK RD - ENGINEERING 1250 TAMIAMI TRAIL NORTH, STE. 203B Naples, Florida 34102 Phone (239) 851-8239 PUD LELY RESORT u PUD NAPLES LAKES COUNTRY CLUB 15MIN. TYPE "B" BUFFER -1]- 16 1 15 21 22 PUD COLLEGE PARK SHADOWWOOD PUDA PL 20190000259 SHADOWWOOD PUD MASTER PLAN DATE PROJECT NO. SCALE 11/2019 2019-240 As Shown 1 OF 1 7F. To p IFF goor we XV4 4 — — — Ve I IF IF — e O.F. . 7 F-Fa, IF Forr ef IV prow IT For IF - - - . - ir a aaL'`Gry.- -go -4. - - IF IF i r 44% -. ! - - - It _ • a - -LL e - IF e IF Iwo e Yi IF r IF IF 1 S Jf _ t _ IF e- _ IV AV mg- , " '- r A t IF It Fop IF Sol? e IF IV IN 41" IF VVIF Fe IV IT 44 I. IF IF qt Fgmzr . IF FIN i -•rgsIF IF . 4,IF I Fig. e Ilow_ y - Y - .." 7 P cow Fee ge ove TV low 00 ANAL IF I VF lot y - IF Foe J£_ _ ";- - !gle- < - - - - AF > gIF IF IF _ .•. ,a7A For,,,,Few e 4 for 3r z goo '�' IF e VIVO 1 Feel. le IF I Vr IF I low fee go �, rx FIT oftewo OFF IF ...IF I _ loge VgFgVF Floor IT IF i law. Mae- lo - -- All VIP AM C�- - - ` 'Y - - - -T E it' :.W _ c 1 ' J_. - - - - s _ - .. ode c t � Ml . Or wo Mr r- �,00 . '-:M' 4 lo Mk for �. Oft z �•� _ _ _ .. s: • iF. _ - Kk` - ` _ .yG .W '•fir a ;ems `Aw lz off I ILI l, low M-MM, INK sib,,�. _IF Y _ MIN M } ' - - �. ,, i`+.'Im _ +'� _ y #OIL MIIft MI Or � 'yi .c. —,AM.-.-.t- Ar MA 191 WOI 01,1 ..� Get IF MOO 0 elk OF o_.-r3 IS -,,IW - !. .� IWO all A Ar "MO LL ¢'e q ON MWy dIr9 Ad ASO OF 4,9 MR MIMI Or 14 k WMM- N ii sa•!!'[yE JOo 0 �n4,r ! � z L J r, Lvat :f ..JoY�^.elf �B1�59 W/NG SOUTH PRIVATE VILLAS UN/T I A CONDOMINIUM IN rHE EA5r //4 OF SECT/ON 16 , T 50-5, R-26-Es COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Pat Wr ku �i,r:ti:,y�+ •_ Y' Ora ifa.—y • S" '�.i �� t � I '� r.:�. .•h' —2f�• Y� �-y ya' CX s��• t� .\{ re =I ? (/ rI /' /.\ q ; {"' O O "•->; Via' /s IIZ . *'I !' OA IV It a PS AN rn 13_ _ t la �� ? 0 t pp,,��E LPro f �•�71 !f `I� tj Jda It so }, PlI :. real 14 IN at F - o ,.gap W It e J of F f ice" E F—IV R !rVj O ,' 1 ! �� J! I SJ'/!'XE eoOJ• le Il t1 t� —ter•—( t • i _.L_L_ 7 _ co.r/.t7o,v .r,zE✓r .: - •r f - , IV I' ? J3 - — i J/ 1, so :I r f t !e --- I7 iru ... I } w r +e v. . ♦ .. .v • '—J - _ _ • • �t ' -= rr n ri t� I F .Q_� ZIP lo O ,'ro',ser Ca p PmKYHNr // F Po PP2a/,OJco fa . OVEMEr: 4 ` T •,I !r r r �, CGMMrrN A2EA i Y` -,As Pla ►� oo AII /7�, lP \ yJ I N y PJ Esasar. N O�/J'PJ/V GSc r7 tart. Mev. N O'/!'PO"/V 6dG f/ CONDOM/NIUM PC.IT -le Plot. vP G/I c�.�Ur .t w sw,ltrae <.r,xr d setlm Is, iae�Wp i'J SmN, pp• M lut, (Llll.r font/, Flerlda; Thnv almR w Sauu lw of L•tlm 11, N N• Il' ST• r, SfS.ff fait; Trca N Y 11l N• n, sf [rt m w a 11Yar17 d f.xar 1W .r stem xad sw rar . n.[c Lc nxnc: Jw• aWmA/,t•vIIlrul Mt1Y It* S1�' W. IN 0 faa[; itraa N 00 11• or, R, 1,11 feat: Throe UI.L frt alxq W arc d .I tlwlar exax, ml• m t6a Sw,lrt rdlra 101.00, a" hrrleiq Y, In, frt; Thou N IS 11. V 111 ilruu 111,/S for dollar w an d a 1 sN ss -tn' n, In.a roc:- nms s /P N' ts•• n, dmNJ:.K�. ..nmr. zN.a � LLmn w rYlw • I mns wt, f:.,'a e..rlr;E 1 a�'s fir• e, sn.N fxt; Slmt f 9 11� N M, 3.N !aK N w 14ca [ YOImlx1. !Wy ppaart of w fat 1[I of sa[tlr I �{, Tmahlp 1a SwtA. Ymaa 3f Lat, Gott or Oo,ntr, aURIfYOP'+ .wrE..nav-rorEa /,aNFnvE.laE vrs Fv ]i/F COSu1OV 7:431 pON"JE NOK TIN R t✓n'E! r✓�e/.F oN5 )b FACT OPIA40 OR"leoS E ll uFNrl ES_ fYtP/b.rE Sr /RC fR✓En CERT/F/CAT/ON: TH/S SURVEYOR A'W rJ¢ETNER TUTU rwE I1nflUNG ac THE OECLOR.o T/ON /5 ACORRECT TION. 4FyElENT/ON aF % E rMPROVE N/Ew'TS OEScz/BEO ONO THERE CON LSE rla"' ~ TNEREFRONi THE NXNIYF/c./fflookcs W/Pv !O t9"rAJ, O.Sp,40PID N3 c" gt illtr or rNE COMMON E[EMENTJ wN0 [7F Ew<H [LN/T .I[[ /.V .atiORn/NCF N?N C a 7//. L)dC S F[ORLLII STATLT J. ,PUCE ¢ N e ./SSC GY-9RucE O, GREEN?ES � rNo EXN/9/T A - nR4 E GREFN s,tS50CIRT6�RL CONIJO.SICNIUM RCar LIST OF REQUESTED DEVIATIONS FROM LDC ShadowWood PUD Deviation 1: Deviation from LDC Section 4.06.02.A, which requires a landscape buffer along the eastern PUD boundary associated with the private airstrip, to allow no buffer. Justification: Tract C separates the subject Tract E from the eastern PUD boundary and Tract C is the location of the existing private airstrip. The eastern PUD boundary within Tract C does not have a buffer as it was permitted and developed in the 1980's. No buffer is needed along the eastern PUD boundary given the platted conservation easements lying east of the subject ShadowWood PUD. PL 20190000259 Shadowwood PUDA_11/27/19 n CQrt 4[�s i —�� u"imna4 +.oar ran,r N __ ___ ___ CC rovorr _____,uwo ,•,: _ w OltMol -._i1 rutratl �—{ — tf YM I/1 1 HE I/, p_p Vi YE 1/, ME 114rl.-..we. end Isurrrn wi M/U°LI IqN (Y'11014D) !tlY 'tm)v m mF (c) — — — MT7J'HY SE 1/4 p' TRACT -E- u ' W 1/, nn 5/400A110C)0 Roll � a I TOP � ever \I ME 114 PUT) to �F[FlOdle.:,a jf�ttlllcoS IF �Lp — ie I ItlP21'1i C.17.61' c) . east r Il7u's:b ISIS1' N) a�—III — g } mA �a a �"` .� e wM L1 II sr .n• AMs6 ME (YTYIOHD) II�II II m�Sn• ,II I �,S >�Tm 1 �-YMIY �omP) 4Yl/'l(Q oulewit f I iom eauT,nn y�OW 1 � rm 1 1 I I I I lau U' I rb' NOC IC1SPd4Ri 061RtCiOV (AII4FM (NI OP. SKYWAY DR. kc NIO Feciez ` w led .os.J� r,d i n u a few lea nSmAi _y.n rnYe,r ww jAI dor Toww u[ rrratYmru,r�amrt�F� MOM tc -ow>er n/4 w w -e[r/4 w w 11101013111 rM/4 w aSrur w rcm. ,....m. b rs s.rwr ale-n+nr r1/4 w er 0/4 w nr e000t n Sri./r/ufle +t m310:11040 ?A ry F nr >d,rr ei lerb..o nnl w w er�T �,..e nnl w w rvrl. �110011110 Pnl w 11=110e rr le.rler M wow a rut m,a men, near mior r( At w er Snm ,a[w O ok .. 5�.. w ...r w s w r/4 d u..a r1 e rry~'ie'! url eel Inow w el bole n _ry S+¢eju �b a ue.ab Wool rasn ce m wracw ueu�.awru ,. aw. �v r2 nv u .emu u>d w r.�s,r .lea S �tnrS� Y w �•e..r, d �.+ver0imr�nwr aim A o`rJIM ....� � Role.:... ewe Me Aldf w,Or rr+.. Protein � n>x.a .�. lal MOM fir r lea, uu wy �' over [llC TYA[ aryl ,�Svn 1 N' u(rl O>s�11 I> WYl sOnrtll rile wrl rm >y raw re, , >r Ml Ss SSIr I<QN[a6 rv� wl m nl Mery Irom ON Mafv.al Tdtl Mrauce Campm/ (omrtulnlnt NWnbf/: bbr E90 Sc/reRJe B-Y •c-s d r.,� r�.q. rwr IrKnw^rrM1�v^n W , rSY M 4 ,ure � ([rtn carry u w}n W Cr+eru w Cse � '� Ii w can a!' 9e.u, r. jai ur f M7, k 3141. zilrpw W I.m YO IOC iCU1Y/Rr i • Cd61MIClbV cAsrlclrt (vw an. I bS® rc rSl�) I I I _ I r aver w•nn. ..� 4sr. rarer n.a..®.r. aM, e. Anrn4r, o 'q A Portion of Section 16 � a Township 50 South, Range 26 Eost £, �z Collier County, Florida *-4 . f I I TA A. •�. # IF 4 - *At J 1 41 ,� ■ :,�� i 16 # 4L j% 44 F ■ #%L Y 0,h' 4 AV . q �j F / ;M0101 � M or I f dP IAoviim W- T*1mothy Finn, AICP,, Principal Planners. 23gm252om4312 f� #.0 w A r bL dD Ft do .�oar 1 or- 41h or L f OS1i* P 0 * ' 10 IL- i t 1 0 1 d 'Pa Pr 4 • `IL :VP ' '�10 1 4t. �Y. - 4J. . , `'� � + ju IP IL PPP 410 IL MIL qP 1 � i -, IF .I t 1 J IL 11P %** RIP 4W -C '` V. TS Ae"A -4 1 40 4100; 'a do P4 r t f I �elip • 7r� • * - If #'AL. Ot � I. a L j • - Ir Ilk 1.4 , . mh w ' 4 SIM } � + t + - - _ `� tea• - sk Ian at f y. .0 as y Foe soil awo opFir Af OF i + k 1 4 t Ik— -� r I Or It i w �A 4 i # 0§6 +r r rA 4} 7 I *A6 r { 1 I . I fi 7 y F p # 95 vt # �r do , Irr # r 4wor '0 40 ' L mew 17 } , l.� Fip + MI { # + ; i do " { i r, " i 1 w % k 10 r * 'PP 4 * ; *' 0 # lie- f 4 7 + i 1 P+ 7 19 rt ! { # f r 41 qp 4 F i A r IF IV f {#` fape WE • or lb Wrap ' } A %" t f1h r , .AhMI, ;�ea40* IP Ob # q # 1. .,. 41 ■ 4F,.�� .0 11 A� �+ L rt .4# � � r t + '� r 4F -a dp R+ Al- dip " �"� -. ti , ef �IL . F if 1p ' Or Fr + ° -.41 � k # - ' + f ■ �. Tw- it 1�� MI&VI F OFd " r p to OF Of d # a i O 41 IL 9w IF ir ,.� F + r 9qw _ a a 0 i A lop C %—qw%kq ik VFW I Im: F.&O As 1w6 w-A L� 6v Nq 14 Pr pp PF qq 6.MosakIN_ v 0 q1 j h4k i IN L " t 16 rt, • F r�-- z r i AOL d - r 4 dw # F dIMMIMM� { J F O+ op fir- "NIL IF A. M q F- IF. A 1A ;�i 4 F 1 y � r, �. rw a 4L r �{ id q r 4016 i IL i Lf % L" . f L - . 1W !i000p - v �W , , &At t - 0 17 k - F '� + si t 0 .. a- , ' �, { , ■ ` + ' + � t �'_ _ }'' ' J r r i � r ■ m i 4 ., ti 1 y f - - �. P. jr r -L It r-Ir IN %k r- .'J - 74. F* I, W, M 1% %w da j 'O % 1pr 0 . ILL- . TL 0 . - 1p 11 - - " i -%;R� 0 � Q� Ahp - . J � .L T, \4 . , LEP kl tr it . ' 'd -4. .;,e , N 4 " wbdI . P J!e V. - -T j -1 ff .r . 0 - �� - i 11 -M _T . v I / 6 I .. t_1 �-'v 4'. , I 7-*0 - � _ , h - .. - it I - " 11. " II.- Aq j, r . V 4 Le � . , a -IfIER, .+� .. 1w. C,v_ ■ �1 r ' . W . 11 I j . - IL . : 1p" -ffl .F .1 - is' -'-,Z 0 dh .a 0 * 1%, 1�4 1 L 0 .p .0" I - . .d .. F i . , . 10 � 4,0P "III, % .1 ; . . 0 - .�, Ow. . :1 'ro- . "ii!!-r _. � I - f JOMI I . ! III , .t !11 . 4 -0 \,. - , 4 q III - M � . , It t - , v I . f p As e J�p - -%- . III, 'IF . .0 / , . , A ,o w _r! T. .1P .e iNw�- It .. I �. . -) I i 60 4�A !,hwl .I 4 7x I,: . % I .. fir + + .0 rib III _ d • 1 ' a F Rd -7 III &JMI . W .wb. I V2 +4 t `� 1 l,+ & F r ' * a- '' '` 4 +'�� ■ F rt F i � + R F y � M1I, ■ �r• 'T - f i }, � 'LO iJ Ij tt..P ;k -+� 1 # I # s I F� `'' ' 4. O ti - P. _ �"'- - } _ + { Jr r' # r T r * v ;04.{� $ { FF 7 � 46s _ �i i' r - y 1,N � IL # �irf I. •r r+ .m d ' 16 -aw - . "_ N '# y Jr S # - I ■ . y # w + { ■' • + r #tiIf p � . ■ ## + � f + J 4 .0 i I ~}' ' . v - . `%we, - . I - \ , it V aW- , 14 F % 0 � -IT I � a POW I 0. r 4 "ON 4 ".. b% ." 41W * , , le ` Yk f■ �T-T ' r , ! � III L r � y i 4f J� Ra . ' ' ■ Op � � . + ' ~ O 1 I, ' i kc I P - - i ■ JF . 1 ■ d pt � i 4' i IIIir - Y ■Z- rip - *% _ •-4 k - ,� dr * y 7 r + y & � + 'Jrti + ! a f - # y i * I - µ � M + It * 4, j * - f F "r� _ i k y + �I j j a FSL ' - r - - ..' . . ft wt ed f i - _ ' f .ram' L , i F ry ow r` ' * +� 'may ~ } r jo �' *F ! t 11 I RF t ti-r - J IK .# ` a ` .6 . fi IL•. i .. �J * t J Jam' i j 1•. iT � t: � %_ - i r `, L&� ,Of 16 t ' +:ai- +" � , f � 41 1 � a• , } - � '� r � ' pf If r � ' r ,M I � � + � � . �.; r � ' �* ' i� �* .:• � t -0 I � � � � ~ • � . .. k R � # 0 Ty ; J �f � { a r - f 4 � L 7+ ., fcr I - & + jrJF ,e f rj ' ` * / i # a i yy + ,a P *�. , , r .fir rI ■A' ;i {' { I! # i '1+ r # i ■ + * r I + I . if. 0 dp 0 0 A mr - _P - , III! x . : '%W 11', . ) . it is X i J f. f' } - L r } ; a 1 ti i . : * \. *� rt . .1 ■ ' i� .RF r •i ■ T T * �J - sr 'rt rv. . ' Jf ■ - ' if . - ( • •} �' 4�, -1 �� .. 4f ■ rJ rr ip eIII , F � I ri' r Y4i .+ - I ,r _ ._ _ 2�, ' �ft {' �. # ; p +-r��■;*t t 4 , - ' * L r{ r }� '': J k 4 r �� N�I/� I r i� F 4 F s r - k t * ■ �• ,y ■ 4 L ■ f i■ F '# } .. M ■jti ' r 1 IL r I ■ F+ - • T F i } r h+ f 4 -ff a . ft IP . I k I J j . . � Al 9 � -i.f TI III -u- 90. 1 dF. b lfj .( si - - r j � . J`% • v , , y 1r •� ' ■" # r _ .7 'U �� . # F ' y .. ' , x '+ � + +i �. � ■ ` it � ;' 1 ' r r i .: L - r r f - I J. 3 j 7h IF OF ' r - F_ �L. 4`1 ! ' ' A * f�L t w� �� ■ � e _ •J,} � � ^ r� � i � l � � L % �. P � � � J� 31 � ��r � { # � : � + I � � � � '� _� * +� � _ � ■ a �� . r � W � � ■ �'1 I i r .; � - ■ V ' � ~ � � -1 ' f � � � , � I �. 1 t, #i F ,r ram'' L r O' ;• f J _ L i r _ i +: _ 1r JL r I 'le, 1 r �JI ifs 1.F I - •A ft..4 *Ip � ' � r t �r i' i 1. 4 ..-� ■ * JRh l A I . j III 1 4010 . . q y , - i " .. III;ir ap - -F - t O 'A . I � . . il . I . � - Mi .0 -) 1� ei .. , rt . 6 % Z71 , OW , . t - 3�i #■ ' , . i. ; I J� +r * t• •/ 7 �. �L + _ J* i L Y .. J � * � � 1' } ;- . K .16W go . 14 4' � .1 f . T I . r ji` 41F 1 . L RWMMPMNP6"- .;� : $ - . - _r - , . 0. "ps 1 0 k . - & " 4 Sk , ;! '% , >- - V ap I A , RL * k. ■ ti it m Yi s ++ v �� y, . %IF S M• r L i ■i P- * y a _ ? ,. I r � _-4 t � i f t r +r . 4 L .l - fir r - _ - , I y iir �� 40 Fjob> t # ' a Li 4. _ I r I �. _ 1 91 41 4 Jam' r #A. 4k 'T. lip O"L � . J 4 `r j ' _Id . I - air 7w h , r I F r.+ _ � ati � - %- 1. a'■ ; ' YI` r■•. - , ! L +� ��J 4 ' * L _ . } 1 r * M r ��, # * MI k ,� .� + ',� - Y ` r - , ■ F't s ' . + • , i 11, Mi M r ir . ;.- k A t I .. A 4 - 0 i 0 . � ,...%_I . r 40 F I - #y v _ r + r IL4 r . . LIL -1 � a I& . . - - ..� 6& . . ie - V er , % - 0 1 1 �4 - It imp I T e lb - _.k . AN- Y � .* - = :'1� _ ti F J � - - f i � r + 1� +L. F y. f ;% 40� ■ i i r- 4 i A - . . - _* , - q* � , . . .wv;%-v R. ti- * . Js� i r r # - �• •� + Ir ).V . k' %W w I ' .i r * �' ! L. . ,. - k f + + 4 . . - .;.g - r+, - . _ III / , hi I ` - 1■! - f J X .R. •� I� 4 ■ f t r '4 . +' * I R r L r {• _ r yy10 - N rq, A ..A I � . r IV -•01 , +� . h -� '04 { + # \ - . t 0 44P V1, N .. 41k " - j `#+ 4 N - _ I�} r } + _•' f l� r , i F �� i_-` ! �' \L 1 r * !6 1� Ir It 7 fy i i R r �4 �� {y s ly- L .1 - dip r F � - M. t ,' ` + t � - I I f '. 1. ; - L - - f ■ - ■ + *f I N., � i ce . ' - - - f+ J" # L rr �L W� y i i '� 1 . �� ` 4- r. 3 It.WOP k _ r * If }r r pr or y' ' ■ � 1 I + , may ( y + IP it i, N. 41 , it JO T 1 #i ti- _9i Or � _ - i •.■ f_ r ;, • Jp. f y. r I t _ r y 'y f j ; .. 1 4F a : . A T �� h ti, #�' JI ,r. ,� L - 4f k . t r4 a * j 4 jT - f�'# } _ �. % '' 11 + * vr .I - I 1. MINI + ' ' �• - } \ r y L Y * • ■ . } - ce y r y L S f'''IF ,y, � \, - . -r ., , . . ; " A 06d . ` 7y a J /4, S : III L* . . � / �' %;_ _ * + +e i 1 11 iF� r. ' "r` �r L ■ ~ f ' ` - rr �' + # . i %. r `` J' � ..Id - r J . F 7 ti 1 � #� * � T . I _ � CIF f �� + -; ; -" � �. f �� . �., � ! i � - � L. � � +. y* r , � JF- I T �"' J _ �f r - ■. , �, r >k i 1 ' }' - 8 , + ■ �r + L�- I - . J� ■ y J 1! : -- I . I � 11 N 141 . 41 - .� i f F ■ r isV K a - I F - � f � +. P ., // ' � i r .4 j Ij _ J - .. ` � - 4,. 9 ■Jr wF y { L Jr .V �F Jire r i i - 66 J _)i Al } r a F II I. � ' Y + Jr JnJ + F,•y r i i� L y 4 ti - - F b 10( . " , , $ . , I ;w dat C. 4 .. . ae . I - U IN- - - L Ir � � I . , I 41I ..�, III 3 \�\ .f% A % I - . ' - F _ F - j e r , - IIIIII* •x yJ - •i ♦ .0 W. •J � r ISPIS ill + 1 - % '+ r ' - 1 , Y� ' - F - y - r - % � # a ' ; • - IF L. I {_ r _r4 J - & 2 - I wig L _. _ r % two'+L� ` .. +•a ' ,. J Z• •L - ,si Mb I* c _ Or "O." R& . f �11 f C I Jr t +� it )� b . P�41 - a . ,kN . w J� . .- _ � * Y r ' � �'r `' J cow - 0-4 .I * • .� - #� * or +.. _ 4 -iF } 4 i r ,f F, r #k _ 1 - + %- yr - 'r4 .L. iyq r L J h L rr F I+ I �� F r ; + r �� , f ` t - • 1 'Y f jr 1 - .. + �� r V r ' • * I • # 5. { Y * } i IF ¢ a - } Y •I� �, 1. T . _� 4. 4 V 1 � •' < r t IV -my A jp k -:1 I . 1L �y.y10 I I.�■, i -d 0 10, " 16 ? I : . •ldp ' r 14 It I 10 j P� . AZ ifti S' Wf } r / h 1 * }91 } X + `I� * �F� #,or a , y t s i *• 1 =ice - \ 41, _ 4; 4 * ■ % � h: __ . . a, � III d 0 I , 1111II-:' jr . % . r I a a ., 10, I N 'do . � - i } . i ) ' . T I i y 4J # F#y, ry + J /I 4 . M6-e " . - 9f. � * le �%ff '. 0 a � 5 .41 4F . . . I . II5d. - .0 �, q I . IF I J - ., I f " -� .P . ,m/ . , A . - - .0 ��it ToIt - 0 j f / A( . r-1 ' ;/ ' F � lb I IN 4�6_" - '� }i;o A - . qk 1. ,�' r .16 Of N Wt �. s- -v_4p '4 ir � # r J f �� 4L% � r fit. q Mp `I { I F%isr % I 1.4 % �. J ' •, J+ - . R % _ i # - yM... i� x 1• . , J { _ � # R L N. {{ �� . _ ' - . 40 04 F.-, %_0 - I ;� ), 7. - - i Al .. � � - a 11�' .# � r .' ,L ,& A -W -- -4; & A - - m Iti . . 0 1 - Rpr .,,, . - k , 4L IP r ir t.. 4- . - . � 0 1 5 . . . I h& . k .- - - 9.. }4 J lb Cdw da J 7 � � � - • � . 4 - :. z � � � A ' . ,w �Ir } 'O '` ak a . -` o- r � r _ r, .: �f .. . YA. . p IFI r., I I � . . 46* - IV no )1;( - 7.;(_ f .IIz, III , rr & _. - r a a i . I 4IIINii P ,. :-I %S b -, y -W, i a , I M%t* N Oe I I I .,.Ow if iii y 13f - aw V -, '% . L --, 6 or `IIIIW IIIIII. , . IL - - I _Q - N . #e... .I. mw 04 - L; JI ? . L II 0 ( LL P, ; , t 1% _. .71 . .1, '. . :�t r . � , .. Op - % '-& - . t .E., . 11 ; � .,e III , ' ,or 4F � � I y .� I ' - �'' W. ; - JO 0 � - m ,6 1 I , 4 . of- , - 7 , '� !F �` Jam' a 4 ■ .� �+ r "r - * 'r �r t + i W � 1 _ + '� � % IN. ' +1 t . 1. It. w , a 44 -WE Ti ff I ,e I -A�' ,4 JMW&l I , .*I. - � - IL -, %.I qft . L IIIp t .�p , , • '' - � F 4 rdppIt r � 46a * Jrrl+*rL # *F .L L•7 _ i. L Ir I ` _ ,it �. . III . k 14 . . ) 1 46 _ rr OF* - A I r_ w . rrr . V, , . L 06 p A (k .a . X ' i t f I 7i s �L � y t� _t - -Ar i N % A , * � f P . . 4.VF jw re A .1 do 4F y -F , 9 r Ii -- . 'k I . t -, In a i . , - I - 100� / -, qu. A .* .. " _,.�A� .00N I I . I - * 'a L LIL el q r r it _ T If II. A.K' .. . .- - - : .. P., I ,c a �' , I - r ) 7 0 �-% ,�� , V ,4� ,-Op" � r ,.,,-. - - -.0% , IN - N. - - I -IIII P - ip, %� N - � -if! I �_ S -F - L_ . I . - Ti . - J�,__ .. .i.. N ,-% - _% Ri . t W r %-,� 11. '. 1'. �6 � 4b v Ad - f . f " M r Id6 �% IN O - + � . -!O.f . . - - qd -, 4& Ib .% . I I L -11 I N k . lt.iie ki - IF - . A r. P� M.- *,A&; 4 10, 0 A Okp -I. q. -, L I. J4 L i 4 � � l - y i p ` +7]J} y #Iz �r *sue { 1 ti ,.or y,� M1 , #; 7F I� T 'Y * -k t F 1. 4 rY _ III 4 - ! +t *t 7 I ' K A - q 1 r 11 ' L , + `Im. 9W ) . - - .1. -, , " � \. - . �y P ;An . v . %R k _ �.p W L � rk •. I MF w i } 0 14.1 �L�i '�'1 _ 4 1 - ' ' j M r ,* * } f6* IL 40 - + Jd 1 y • * - , W. �v4_ ' f 4 F _ 0 / �. 4 3�s y & IF � -It: - F . F* 0 . & p �- *X-w, - L NC - . I I . � , lip mr, .-�,N N . %,�, % L al . I t - . ` r F - * % .. f -+.ter 1• ' v'. %z 1k. I ti x f *` ch +, a0% 1w - 1 6 - N , ■ k , IIIim i y `+ - s ■ -- ° { ti L ■is ,-1F v! q.e. s. . t 1 #t +�+,may- 3 ■ 4 1 r 4 y R11. L L ;+ t �r ■a■ i} ■' � I % * 1 ' fi y ;� y y� ,yF L. 1 'I r f *r Y ' i1 ■ ■ _ k L y `. .f '' � .4 1OF, %, � - �,Q *4 - �_ ME, . ..� �A� e. 4 - �wk;� . p I >T 4 r �* # f �r +,,�.�y,,� .+ a 1 •-L+l,pie •_ -yy� 40 iy Imo_ , r �. 1 ■ 1'c ■ a } ' L •'IIIII+ 10 /. . w i tr .1 L 4L T '9�r r ■ + Ir t$1 N am IF , I 'AV ■ I 5 i + ,& ' • r '} ' r ' a _ F + 1, - t- ?' *�+� ■ 5 At * ,� ' ' I ■y 4 h i % L ' - A L o *f � I .h � * -lam F� # � `_' ; � � � � •� � f � �7 •r' _ (,.�: � ; ■ i ~� � � � •-F• .s - F r 7 I� - .�# 1 ._ 4 } r y X. � � ■ # J� f ' { f ` ti � ' - . I. %� L . # IL } -. r } , �L s * r . r } i * f } + a + O .. .. 4 I - F e - ,� { r •i I� 3 '. L 5• 1 . .a x i _ _ ,� 5 - - ' , F Xmto . L + / '�'�Nrt + it 6. , Ar % . * I r' # r JI ' r* # - J { `'rJ � y + T F f r` ',� - c� �� i _ �t =.�; - r - - L� +, - . . q& - k . 1� 0 , . .FA:jn I . k " I 4 L - . . . - . .1k F IF R . r I .L I. ,h r r` { f + 1 '' �ii rA } ■ 1 a ■} F I I 'k: I ■5 _fi I �I T 4d 1+ J 4 � r a J 71, opt - , ___ . 0 't IV '� I I 70 'f ,�II. � F �t Jlaa t * 11' 33 +J r * 1 , r \ N, ��, 4.. . I i e , _41-9. r L . *0 - �r r %. L- ' 1 `J , iT '6 . - I I ..4 a ~� I ` I .} - r F 2i v 5 , r 1 jb�1 � z r ■ 5 . . ': �r. - . - or e � - k IIIIIIII� ti TSr r r�4 J J ■ I (I LOV ' f`IkI III:! 1 + ii r ■ L t �- T III'f y L i r +' r i i i *_ Ti-, L- +r , * , I e r . A.. 1_ J y � A ■ } M *iko it I J 1 I it 5 5 .. v , # F - ' r i{{e 1l j I If ` 7 ' 4 11 . I �` ' r� ' I i J I 1 . ■ i ■ F. 11� - . j ' + I I y 1 f Ir x■I iM1 # � 1 4 � . +. IC , � ;r 1 % AIIII A -j OL F - + y ' Ly _ r �JL� 11 � f , . - ' % 5 I I r` 5 ■ .' rf t4 _ ti R � 4 - N r ti r 1kA { r4 , 11 r ■ ++ i % F I I 4 5 Ild 4' 1- -(� -14 - ti i 1 r �% 9 s # i I T JM ti a - ky ; I L r} �• ti ► ti - k ... , I . . ; j ri - 4 . . d . j 4?m 0 i:� , - I I � 9V IV. I 4 k I I . -0 O . - � R 6 - . r .1 � tf . . I . or ++ J ~ +' ' P. ' M1 - - ' _ i ` is k 1 1 i• . i +i + '# AL k L t d f LAD I t.I i t��Y 7. r. F F # M . 00' # r } ' } FA% A - 7"" \ 1 - - . F IT �.f " . j __ job . PV: , , +* .1% -4 - f a I % . .. .. lk -__ kb I f ' 1 *� ` ' + - In r r i ' r y 1 ' iI 1 r- - r r �-hr L I} 1_ A.f- F - r I I 4 ' ~ # * � _ f } x4a t 5 4 J , L - / .. .F Ir r yl I ' _ ' ; 1 - r_ • I _ II I i - - R F ; -- •Y L 7 lA 1 f T ff 1 � J + t , I_ +Y - . Y 1. " � V , O t . X " . % I . a& 4. r +k . L II - F +L y i y A 1. '� rL . -I '� I ` i i f� J L• I .� I. r { !l 1 �.,T • • I L 1 _ a� � � 1w .. I I ' I �ti . .Lt �i .� +r YARI Mh H AIRING NOTICE ShadowWood PUDA A Planned Unit Development Amendment, Petition No. PL20190000259 CCPC: FEBRUARY 20., 2020 - 9:00 a.m. BCC: JUKE 9, 2020 - 9:00 a.m. Collier County Government Center 3299 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, FL 34112 Timothy Finn, AICP, Principal Planner: 239-252-4312 Alm Ak�- PUBLIC HE' RIN NOTICE ShadowWood PUDA A Planned Unit Development Amendment Petition No. PL20190000259 CCPC: FEBRUARY 20, BCC: JUKE 9, 2 Collier 3299 East Timothy Finn, 2020 - 9:00 a.m. 020 - 9:00 a.m. County Government Center Tamiami Trail, Naples, FL 34112 AICP, Principal Planner: 239-252-4312, n w` BCC : JUNE 90 2 020 ' ' a r-� Collier County Center 4' , 112 3299 • !' Timothy-4312 1 . l Planner: 239-252 7'+ r�ny '�• I1NV s a M1 a ! yw RLD " �n V ".a y. W F