The URL can be used to link to this page

Agenda 02/25/2020 Item #11C (Agreement #19-7494 w/Jacobs Engineering Group)02/25/2020 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Recommendation to approve Agreement Number 19-7494, in the amount of $1,058,378, with Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc., for “Professional Design and Related Services for Vanderbilt Beach Road widening from East of US-41 to East of Goodlette Frank Road (Project No. 60199),” and authorize the Chairman to sign the attached agreement. OBJECTIVE: To secure a consulting firm to provide design and related services for the Vanderbilt Beach Road Widening Project, from east of US-41 to east of Goodlette Frank Rd., to satisfy the long- range transportation plan CONSIDERATIONS: On March 12, 2019, the Board approved the final ranking of Request for Professional Services No. 19-7494 (Agenda Item 16.A.18), for the Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project, as follows: The Board directed staff to initiate negotiations with the top ranked firm, Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc. (“Jacobs”). Negotiations with Jacobs commenced on April 9, 2019, starting with a scope meeting with County staff. Jacobs originally presented a proposal in the amount of $1,362,658.00, which staff negotiated down to $1,058,378 following a series of negotiation sessions coordinated by the County’s Procurement Services Division. Staff recommends that the Board approve the attached Agreement with Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc., in the negotiated amount of $1,058,378.00, to provide the detailed scope of engineering services set forth therein for the Vanderbilt Beach Road Widening Project, from East of US-41 to East of Goodlette Frank Road (Project No. 60199). FISCAL IMPACT: Funds in the amount of $1,058,378 will be paid from impact fees within Vanderbilt Beach Road widening from East of US-41 to East of Goodlette Frank Road, Project 60199. Approval of this item will not have an impact on operational and maintenance costs; however, the completed project can be expected to have the following operational and maintenance impacts: minimal to no maintenance costs are expected to be incurred within the first 5 to 7 years of service for the new section of road, while future costs will be absorbed into the regular maintenance schedule thereafter. The construction project is planned for the latter part of year 2021, with an expected cost of approximately $13 million. This road widening has been approved by the Board as part of the Annual Update of Inventory Report. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This item is approved as to form and legality and requires majority vote for Board approval. -SRT GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: This project meets current Growth Management Plan standards to ensure the adequacy and availability of viable public facilities. RECOMMENDATION: To approve Agreement Number 19-7494, in the amount of $1,058,378, with Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc., for “Professional Design and Related Services for Vanderbilt Beach 11.C Packet Pg. 249 02/25/2020 Road widening from East of US-41 to East of Goodlette Frank Road (Project No. 60199),” and authorize the Chairman to sign the attached agreement. Prepared by: Mario A. Puente, P.E. for Dennis McCoy P.E., Project Manager, Transportation Engineering Division. ATTACHMENT(S) 1. 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (PDF) 2. 19-7494 JacobsEngineering_Insurance_1-22-20 (PDF) 3. Fully Executed NORA (PDF) 4. 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (PDF) 11.C Packet Pg. 250 02/25/2020 COLLIER COUNTY Board of County Commissioners Item Number: 11.C Doc ID: 11479 Item Summary: Recommendation to approve Agreement Number 19-7494, in the amount of $1,058,378, with Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc., for “Professional Design and Related Services for Vanderbilt Beach Road widening from East of US-41 to East of Goodlette Frank Road (Project No. 60199),” and authorize the Chairman to sign the attached agreement. (Jay Ahmad, Transportation Engineering Division Director) Meeting Date: 02/25/2020 Prepared by: Title: – Transportation Engineering Name: Mario Puente 01/23/2020 3:07 PM Submitted by: Title: Division Director - Transportation Eng – Transportation Engineering Name: Jay Ahmad 01/23/2020 3:07 PM Approved By: Review: Growth Management Department Christine Arnold Level 1 Reviewer Completed 01/23/2020 3:15 PM Procurement Services Opal Vann Level 1 Purchasing Gatekeeper Completed 01/24/2020 8:46 AM Transportation Engineering Jay Ahmad Additional Reviewer Completed 01/24/2020 9:22 AM Transportation Engineering Marlene Messam Additional Reviewer Completed 01/24/2020 9:43 AM Procurement Services Evelyn Colon Additional Reviewer Completed 01/24/2020 11:13 AM Procurement Services Sandra Herrera Additional Reviewer Completed 01/27/2020 12:33 PM Procurement Services Priscilla Doria Additional Reviewer Completed 01/30/2020 1:06 PM Growth Management Department Lisa Taylor Additional Reviewer Completed 01/30/2020 2:57 PM Growth Management Operations Support Christopher Johnson Additional Reviewer Completed 01/31/2020 10:32 AM Growth Management Department Gene Shue Additional Reviewer Completed 02/03/2020 11:27 AM Growth Management Department Jeanne Marcella Department Head Review Completed 02/03/2020 12:35 PM County Attorney's Office Scott Teach Level 2 Attorney Review Completed 02/06/2020 9:21 AM Office of Management and Budget Debra Windsor Level 3 OMB Gatekeeper Review Completed 02/06/2020 11:49 AM County Attorney's Office Jeffrey A. Klatzkow Level 3 County Attorney's Office Review Completed 02/06/2020 2:57 PM Office of Management and Budget Laura Zautcke Additional Reviewer Completed 02/11/2020 1:35 PM 11.C Packet Pg. 251 02/25/2020 Office of Management and Budget Susan Usher Additional Reviewer Completed 02/18/2020 3:48 PM County Manager's Office Leo E. Ochs Level 4 County Manager Review Completed 02/18/2020 4:07 PM Board of County Commissioners MaryJo Brock Meeting Pending 02/25/2020 9:00 AM 11.C Packet Pg. 252 11.C.1Packet Pg. 253Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1Packet Pg. 254Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1Packet Pg. 255Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1Packet Pg. 256Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1Packet Pg. 257Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1Packet Pg. 258Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1Packet Pg. 259Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1Packet Pg. 260Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1Packet Pg. 261Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1Packet Pg. 262Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1Packet Pg. 263Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1Packet Pg. 264Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1Packet Pg. 265Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1Packet Pg. 266Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1Packet Pg. 267Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1Packet Pg. 268Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1 Packet Pg. 269 Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1Packet Pg. 270Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1Packet Pg. 271Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1Packet Pg. 272Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1Packet Pg. 273Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1Packet Pg. 274Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1Packet Pg. 275Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1Packet Pg. 276Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1Packet Pg. 277Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1Packet Pg. 278Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1Packet Pg. 279Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1Packet Pg. 280Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1Packet Pg. 281Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1Packet Pg. 282Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1Packet Pg. 283Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1Packet Pg. 284Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1Packet Pg. 285Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1Packet Pg. 286Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1Packet Pg. 287Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1Packet Pg. 288Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1Packet Pg. 289Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1Packet Pg. 290Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1Packet Pg. 291Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1Packet Pg. 292Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1Packet Pg. 293Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1Packet Pg. 294Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1Packet Pg. 295Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1Packet Pg. 296Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1Packet Pg. 297Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1Packet Pg. 298Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1Packet Pg. 299Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1Packet Pg. 300Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1Packet Pg. 301Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1Packet Pg. 302Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1Packet Pg. 303Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1Packet Pg. 304Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1Packet Pg. 305Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1Packet Pg. 306Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1Packet Pg. 307Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1Packet Pg. 308Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1Packet Pg. 309Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1Packet Pg. 310Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1Packet Pg. 311Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1Packet Pg. 312Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1Packet Pg. 313Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1Packet Pg. 314Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1Packet Pg. 315Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1Packet Pg. 316Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1Packet Pg. 317Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1Packet Pg. 318Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1Packet Pg. 319Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1Packet Pg. 320Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1Packet Pg. 321Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1Packet Pg. 322Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1Packet Pg. 323Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1Packet Pg. 324Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1Packet Pg. 325Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1Packet Pg. 326Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1Packet Pg. 327Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1Packet Pg. 328Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1Packet Pg. 329Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1Packet Pg. 330Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1Packet Pg. 331Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1Packet Pg. 332Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1Packet Pg. 333Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1Packet Pg. 334Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1Packet Pg. 335Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1Packet Pg. 336Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1Packet Pg. 337Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1Packet Pg. 338Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1Packet Pg. 339Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1Packet Pg. 340Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1Packet Pg. 341Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1Packet Pg. 342Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1Packet Pg. 343Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1Packet Pg. 344Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1Packet Pg. 345Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1Packet Pg. 346Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1Packet Pg. 347Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1Packet Pg. 348Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1Packet Pg. 349Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1Packet Pg. 350Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1Packet Pg. 351Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1Packet Pg. 352Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1Packet Pg. 353Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1Packet Pg. 354Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1Packet Pg. 355Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1 Packet Pg. 356 Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1Packet Pg. 357Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.1Packet Pg. 358Attachment: 19-7494 JacobEngineering_Contract_VendorSigned (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE INSURER F : INSURER E : INSURER D : INSURER C : INSURER B : INSURER A : NAIC # NAME: CONTACT (A/C, No): FAX E-MAIL ADDRESS: PRODUCER (A/C, No, Ext): PHONE INSURED REVISION NUMBER:CERTIFICATE NUMBER:COVERAGES IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must have ADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. OTHER: (Per accident) (Ea accident) $ $ N / A SUBR WVD ADDL INSD THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. $ $ $ $PROPERTY DAMAGE BODILY INJURY (Per accident) BODILY INJURY (Per person) COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT AUTOS ONLY AUTOSAUTOS ONLY NON-OWNED SCHEDULEDOWNED ANY AUTO AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY Y / N WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED? (Mandatory in NH) DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below If yes, describe under ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE $ $ $ E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE E.L. EACH ACCIDENT ER OTH- STATUTE PER LIMITS(MM/DD/YYYY) POLICY EXP (MM/DD/YYYY) POLICY EFF POLICY NUMBERTYPE OF INSURANCELTR INSR DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS / LOCATIONS / VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, may be attached if more space is required) EXCESS LIAB UMBRELLA LIAB $EACH OCCURRENCE $AGGREGATE $ OCCUR CLAIMS-MADE DED RETENTION $ $PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG $GENERAL AGGREGATE $PERSONAL & ADV INJURY $MED EXP (Any one person) $EACH OCCURRENCE DAMAGE TO RENTED $PREMISES (Ea occurrence) COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY CLAIMS-MADE OCCUR GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: POLICY PRO- JECT LOC CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE DATE (MM/DD/YYYY) CANCELLATION AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE ACORD 25 (2016/03) © 1988-2015 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. CERTIFICATE HOLDER The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD HIRED AUTOS ONLY WLR C65892248 (AOS) WCUC65892285 (AK,LA,OH,TX)* SCF C65892327 (WI) Naples, FL 34112 X 1,000,000 58381184 58381184 5,000 1,000,000 CONTRACT.* OF INSURANCE WILL NOT EXCEED OR BROADEN IN ANY WAY THE TERMS, CONDITIONS, AND LIMITS AGREED TO UNDER THE APPLICABLE holder's insurance is excess and non-contributory. *THE TERMS, CONDITIONS, AND LIMITS PROVIDED UNDER THIS CERTIFICATE performance of insured's services to cert holder under contract for captioned work. Coverage is primary and certificate Commissioners is added as an additional insured for general liability as respects the negligence of the insured in the 1/31/2024. SECTOR: Public. *$2,250,000 SIR for states of: AK, LA, OH, TX. Collier County Board of County PROJECT MGR: Bill Gramer. CONTRACT MGR: Bill Gramer. RE: Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening. CONTRACT END DATE: X USA LIC #0437153 Los Angeles, CA 90071 X 07/01/19 07/01/20 1000 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 2100 1-212-948-1306 C/O Global Risk Management N X CIRTS_Support@jacobs.com Marsh Risk & Insurance Services CONTRACTUAL LIABILITY Collier County Board of County Commissioners 500,000 1-212-948-1306 Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. Los Angeles, CA 90017 07/01/20 1,000,000 3327 Tamiami Trail East 01/22/2020 633 W. Fifth Street X ISA H25295511A 2,000,000 1,000,000 X ACE AMER INS CO A A A HDO G71565129 nyumdo_newgalexy 1,000,000 1,000,000 A 1,000,000 X 22667 07/01/19 07/01/19 07/01/20 07/01/19 07/01/20 07/01/19 07/01/20 11.C.2 Packet Pg. 359 Attachment: 19-7494 JacobsEngineering_Insurance_1-22-20 (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.2 Packet Pg. 360 Attachment: 19-7494 JacobsEngineering_Insurance_1-22-20 (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) SUPP (10/00) SUPPLEMENT TO CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DATE NAME OF INSURED: Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. 01/22/2020 11.C.2 Packet Pg. 361 Attachment: 19-7494 JacobsEngineering_Insurance_1-22-20 (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.3 Packet Pg. 362 Attachment: Fully Executed NORA (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) TR0915161136SWF Request for Professional Services Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project November 12, 2018RPS No. 19-7494 11.C.4 Packet Pg. 363 Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 November 12, 2018 Procurement Strategist Collier County, Florida Procurement Services Division 3295 Tamiami Trail East, Bldg. C-2 Naples, FL 34112 Subject: Request for Professional Services Vanderbilt Beach Road (VBR) 6-Lane Widening Project RPS No. 19-7494 Dear Selection Committee Members: The Collier County Transportation Engineering Division (County) will need the assistance of a consultant with unique planning, engineering and construction technical expertise to modify the current VBR 4-lane facility to a safe, 6-lane facility efficiently and effectively. Our team will be required to prepare contract documents, including plans, specifications, supporting engineering analysis, calculations and applicable technical documents, to ensure that the Vanderbilt Beach Road Widening Project can be built as designed and meets FDOT and County specifications and requirements. This 4-lane “constricted” segment of VBR is a key component of the Vanderbilt Beach Road Corridor and the County roadway network. As such, operational and safety considerations are paramount during design, throughout construction and when the facility is open to traffic. It is critical that the consultant team thoroughly understands the design, permitting and construction challenges associated with this widening project to avoid delays and minimize impacts to the public and adjacent businesses To successfully complete this project in the most expeditious way possible, the County needs to partner with a proven, local team of consultants who bring to the project unmatched institutional knowledge of the individual roadways, the dynamics of the local traffic patterns, an understanding of stakeholder concerns, a well-defined approach to critical path items and recent, relevant experience providing similar services on 10 major roadways in Collier County. Jacobs is that team! In December 2017, Jacobs acquired CH2M HILL. Combining the resources of two industry leading engineering firms provides the County access to more than 78,000 staff. Our team has the experience, technical capabilities and staff availability to assist you and your stakeholders with the full range of expertise that will be required to complete this project. You will be working with the same local team you already know who are now backed by the deepest and most experienced bench of resources in the industry. Our team, led by Project Manager Bill Gramer, PE, AICP, has full access to all the resources required to deliver the Vanderbilt Beach Road 6-Lane Widening Project. He is your primary point of contact. Bill has 30 years of transportation planning, design and construction experience and has served as project manager and project coordinator for all the major roadway projects our firm has completed in Collier County, as well as 15 General Service Contracts. Your staff knows Bill as a proactive client service manager who is 100 percent dedicated to Collier County. Bill is the ideal choice to manage your project as he meets all the stated preferences in your RPS; knowledge and experience with local construction and regulatory conditions, strong commitment to team collaboration at or near the project site, and successful management of an integrated team of professionals who have a history of working together on similar projects. Supporting Jacobs on this project will be three local Collier County subconsultant firms: Johnson Engineering, Capital Consulting Services, and Forge Engineering. They will be joined by IF Rooks & Associates, who will provide any required aerial photography and survey. These firms bring specialized skills and relevant knowledge of both the County and the Jacobs staff proposed to serve on this project. Jacobs has previously worked with each of these firms. Our four subconsultants are a perfect complement to our team from a professional and personal perspective and offers the County individuals they know and trust to undertake this high-profile project. The Jacobs Team is FDOT Certified in all required Service Categories. 11.C.4 Packet Pg. 364 Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 11.C.4 Packet Pg. 365 Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 SECTION 1 Ability of Professional Personnel 11.C.4 Packet Pg. 366 Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt 1-1 SECTION 1 ABILITY OF PROFESSIONAL PERSONNEL Since 1977, Collier County has consistently relied on our team to provide planning, design, permitting and construction services on a multitude of projects. This long-term relationship has enabled our Naples-based staff to develop an excellent understanding of the local infrastructure as well as County staff and stakeholders. We have more than 30 years of experience delivering projects in the County, which has resulted in an understanding of your organization, individuals and preferred process for project delivery. Our Naples team understands the critical elements necessary to successfully deliver County projects and ensure that the Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening project complies with all applicable standards. Our Subconsultant Partners “Preference will be given to companies making up the team that have worked together on delivery of similar projects”. We routinely work together and offer an integrated approach to provide successful project solutions. For this project, we have chosen to team with proven local subconsultant firms who have the required specialized expertise and knowledge of the project site, a history of quality work on previous projects, and most importantly, have shown a commitment to meet schedule and budget. Johnson Engineering, Inc. will provide all required utilities, survey/ROW, and assist with environmental tasks. Johnson provides engineering design for land development, land planning and landscape architecture, utilities improvements, transportation design, and construction observation and inspection. Their surveying and mapping group specializes in subsurface utility location and mapping (SUE), transportation surveying, hydrographic surveying, and geographic information systems. Johnson has provided services on many projects in the County, including work on Livingston Road, as detailed in Section 3, Past Performance, of this proposal. Jacobs and Johnson have worked together on a variety of projects throughout Florida as well as projects specific to the County. Capital Consulting Solutions (CCS) is a MBE firm located in Collier County. CCS will provide a range of transportation and roadway services and brings to the County local knowledge and relationships with stakeholders and Southwest Florida groups, such as the County, FDOT District One, Lee County, Seminole Tribe of Florida, and the City of Bonita Springs. CCS has worked side- by-side with our Naples-based staff on numerous projects, including the County’s General Services contracts. CCS Founder, Adam Ahmad, has direct experience on County roadways, including Vanderbilt Beach Road, Collier Blvd., Immokalee Road, Oil Well Road, and Tree Farm Road. Forge Engineering, Inc. (FORGE) is a 20-year-old full service firm located in Collier County, Florida since its inception. Their team has provided services on dozens of Collier County roadway and utility improvement projects. Examples include West Goodlette-Frank Joint Stormwater-Sewer Improvement Project, Naples Park Sanitary sewer and roadway replacement projects, Immokalee Roadway coring and evaluation, J & C Boulevard Roadway coring and evaluation, and intersections mast arms for Tropicana Boulevard & Golden Gate Parkway, Golden Gate Parkway & 50th Street SW, Saturn Court & North Collier Boulevard and 9th Street South & 6th Avenue South Intersection Mast Arms. I.F. Rooks & Associates is a full service geospatial firm, serving clients throughout the Southeastern United States. They provide a full suite of geospatial services including Low Altitude Photogrammetry and Aerial LiDAR as well as Terrestrial Mobile LiDAR (TML). I.F. Rooks is Pre-Qualified by the FDOT in the 8.3 Workgroup – Photogrammetry and has completed mapping projects in every District in the State. They have provided Photogrammetry services for numerous Jacobs FDOT projects managed by our team members. 11.C.4 Packet Pg. 367 Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 1-2 A truly integrated team of professionals brings broad-based skills and experience to meet all project requirements The key personnel that have committed to working on the County’s project bring a broad base of technical expertise and familiarity with the County and Southwest Florida, as well as accessibility and availability to meet with County staff as needed. Our team organization structure is shown on Exhibit 1-1 below. EXHIBIT 1-1 Team Organizational Chart 11.C.4 Packet Pg. 368 Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 1-3 The following are brief overviews of our team management and task leads and their unique qualifications to serve you on this project. Resumes for all team leaders shown on our team’s organization chart can be found in the Appendices of this submittal. Bill Gramer, Project Manager and primary point of contact for the County on all matters related to this project, has more than 30 years of experience in managing and coordinating multi-firm team efforts and provides insight into local conditions, clients and agencies. Bill is well known to the County as a proactive manager who has been 100% dedicated to Collier County for more than 17 years, including serving as project manager/project coordinator for 15 General Services contracts. Bill is supported locally by our 17-person Naples office, which houses many employees known to County staff, local consultants and stakeholders. Lance Decuir, PE, AICP will provide QA/QC for roadway tasks on this project. From transportation policy initiatives at the local level to PD&E studies at the statewide level, he has proven experience in various transportation disciplines, including planning, public involvement, engineering, and environmental studies. Lance has prepared/managed transportation plans, alternatives analysis, major investment studies and policies, addressed regional mobility challenges, traffic studies, and accessibility issues. Amy Windom, PE, QA/QC for drainage, has 31 years of experience in stormwater facility planning and design for major transportation projects in Florida. In addition to performing drainage design analysis and plans, she is proficient in preparing and obtaining environmental permit packages for SFWMD and USACE and has expertise with FDOT design requirements and cost-saving approaches. Amy served as the Senior Drainage Engineer for the I-4 Memorial and US 441 Design Build projects for District 1. Ken Wooten, PE, Roadway Design Lead, has more than 19 years of experience specializing in roadway design and planning for highway facilities such as interstate highways, interchanges, freeways, intersections, and urban and rural arterial roads. Ken has extensive experience on projects for FDOT throughout Florida and served as the Roadway Design Engineer for the County’s Oil Well Road project. Scott Bear, PE, Constructability Lead, has 31 years of experience including guiding design teams’ focus on criteria, quality, TCP, and constructability for FDOT projects. Scott has served in both design and construction-related roles and thoroughly understands the link between these two phases. He served as Project Manager for the County’s Oil Well Road project and as the Constructability Reviewer for District 1’s US 441 Design Build. Tom Ross, PE, Traffic/Signals Lead, has more than 28 years of experience in providing design and quality review for roadway signing and pavement marking, signals, ITS, and lighting projects. Tom has experience working with FDOT District 1, having served as Project Manager for multiple cycles of the General Transportation Planning Consultant and Districtwide Systems Planning contracts. Mike Dickey, PE, Utilities Lead, has 20 years of experience on utility projects, including planning and distribution and collection systems. With both utility design and construction experience, Mike has a comprehensive understanding of the entire utility development process from planning to design, to permitting through construction. He knows how to develop a design that works both in theory and in practice. 11.C.4 Packet Pg. 369 Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 1-4 Kennedy Simmonds, PE, Drainage Lead, has more than 16 years of experience in stormwater management systems, drainage, permitting, wastewater treatment, utilities, and multi-use trails. He is actively involved in numerous drainage and permitting projects for FDOT, including design, and land development projects. Kennedy was the Design Team Drainage Engineer for the County’s Oil Well Road Widening Design project. Redundant technical resources to support our Task Leads keeps your project on schedule and within budget Team Member Role on this Project Yrs. Exp. License Work in SW FL? Team Member Role on this Project Yrs. Exp. License Work in SW FL? Jared Brown, PE Utility Design/Construction 19 PE Y Richard Lundberg, PE Geotechnical 30 PE Y Billy Saum, EI Utility Design/Construction 3 EIT Y Robert McGinnis, EI Geotechnical 3 EIT Y Chris Jubran, PE Drainage/ Permitting 29 PE Y Katus Watson, PE Constructability/Estimating 22 PE Y Rick Gorsira, ENV SP Environmental 39 NA Y Mike Devore Constructability/Estimating 32 NA N Laura Herrero Environmental 24 NA Y Scott Barber, RLA Landscape Architecture 28 RLA Y Gregory Thomas Environmental 3 NA Y Brett Nein, RLA Landscape Architecture 34 RLA Y Dan Kushnar Roadway Design 21 NA Y Tara Jones, PE PI/Business Outreach 21 PE Y David Hernandez, PE Roadway Design 10 NA Y Barry Syren Survey/ROW 40 PSM Y Chad Polk, PE Bike/Ped Safety 16 PE Y Ray Dechert Survey/ROW 12 NA Y Robert Paquin Bike/Ped Safety 4 NA Y Mark Wentzel, PSM SUE 40 PSM Y DeeAngela Tjikueni, PE Lighting/S&PM/Signals 22 PE Y Ike Rooks, PSM Photogrammetry 30 PSM N Milagros Cepeda Lighting/S&PM/Signals 24 NA Y Dave McKay, PSM Terrestrial Mobile LiDAR 32 PSM N Bhushan Godbole, PE Structures 28 PE Y Lev Zilberman, PE Structures 23 PE Y 11.C.4 Packet Pg. 370 Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 1-5 Our team members know Collier County and understand all facets of your project “Preference will be given to teams with knowledge and experience with local construction and regulatory conditions and who demonstrate a strong commitment to team collaboration proximate to the project site”. The Vanderbilt Beach Road project requires a team that has a complete understanding of not only the technical complexities of the project but also brings institutional knowledge of the various components of the project - the roadways and intersection, traffic patterns, stakeholders, utilities, business access, etc. Our team has been working on Collier County roadways and intersections for more than two decades and, as members of the Naples community, have professional and personal knowledge of the various facets that are of critical importance to successfully completing this project. Our team has carefully reviewed the documentation and plans included as part of the RPS, and are confident that we have the technical expertise, local knowledge and experience on Vanderbilt Beach Road, established relationships, and proven commitment to the County to complete this project in a streamlined, timely, and cost-effective manner. Roadway Design We have put together a team that has worked on nearly every major roadway in the County over the past two decades, including providing both planning and design services for Vanderbilt Beach Road over the last 20 years. Our Naples-based team members bring knowledge of the current and historical challenges of this intersection, including congestion, geotechnical, community issues, pavement, signals, and other considerations. We have faced these same challenges on this roadway, as well as similar facilities in the County, and have a proven history of delivering solutions that result in a buildable and operational project. Drainage We are experienced in all aspects of drainage design. Our services include drainage studies, storm drainage system design, evaluation and improvement of existing drainage systems, hydrology and hydraulics, flood routing, detention storage, erosion control and storm water treatment. We have planned and designed closed and open drainage systems throughout Florida and have planned and designed over 70 miles storm water systems for Collier County roadways, including 30+ pond systems. Traffic Our team members have performed preliminary engineering analyses and final engineering designs for both individual intersections and area-wide and arterial traffic signal control systems. These projects have involved determining traffic signal physical and operational requirements to optimize traffic operational efficiency, safety, air quality, and energy conservation; signal warrant and interconnection analyses; preliminary functional designs for signal and intersection/ roadway physical and operational improvements; and final design plans, specifications, cost estimates and construction contract documents. Our team has performed this type of work for cities, counties and the FDOT. Local Construction Our team has provided a full range of construction phase and inspection services in Southwest Florida for more than 20 years. Firmwide, we 11.C.4 Packet Pg. 371 Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 1-6 have on staff thousands of construction managers and inspectors who are available to advise, review or support projects that include construction plan development or construction site services. In addition to our global corporate resources, our Naples office staff has licensed Florida contractors and inspectors in-house who possess the critical local knowledge to serve the County. Our Naples-based staff has provided construction phase/ CEI services to the County under its Fixed Term Professional CEI contract, Collier County Emergency Services Complex, Vanderbilt Beach Road Parking Garage, County Courthouse Parking Garage, County Jail Addition and Renovation, Fleet Maintenance Facility Expansion, County Courthouse Annex; and South Regional and Golden Gate Libraries, to name a few. In addition, our team has expertise and broad experience in alternative delivery projects. Scott Bear, our Constructability Task Lead, has managed several Design-Build projects in Florida, including several for FDOT District 1. Community/Business Coordination Our team members have successfully worked with the public and business communities on projects in Collier County, including our work on Pine Ridge, Vanderbilt Beach and Immokalee Roads. The public is concerned about local access and circulation issues, traffic demands, impacts to local businesses and residential areas as well as general aesthetics. A proactive public involvement program, initiated early in the project, will be developed to promote public input and disseminate project information. This effort will enhance public acceptance and help expedite project progression by avoiding any surprises during the process. By establishing lines of communication and an open dialogue, understanding and acceptance of the project will be promoted, allowing it to move forward on schedule. 11.C.4 Packet Pg. 372 Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 1-7 Permitting/Regulatory Experience in Southwest Florida W e have successfully worked with the Florida Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, and Federal Transit Administration reviewing the plans for meeting state and federal guidelines. Exhibit 1-2 demonstrates our team’s experience with Regulatory Agencies (including those with jurisdiction in Collier County). Exhibit 1-2 Our team has a proven track record of successfully working with local, regional and state permitting and regulatory agencies. PROJECT OR CLIENT AGENCY USEPA USACE USFWS FDEP DCA FGFWFC WMD RPC County & Municipal PERMIT TYPE Stormwater (NPDES) PSD Federal Highway Admin. Federal Transit Dredge/Fill Wildlife Review Wetlands Mangroves Air Quality (Title V) Water Quality Underground Injection Solid Waste Hazardous Waste Wastewater FDOT DRI Wildlife Wetlands MSSW Water Use DRI Wetlands Land Use & Zoning Vanderbilt Beach Road, Collier County, FL ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Pine Ridge Road Widening, Collier County, FL ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Collier Blvd. (Golden Gate to Immokalee), Collier County, FL ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Collier Blvd. (U.S. 41 to Davis), Collier County, FL ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Immokalee Road Widening, Collier County, FL ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Lee County MPO 2040 LRTP ✓ ✓ ✓ Charlotte County-Punta Gorda MPO 2040 LRTP ✓ ✓ ✓ Hillsborough County 2035 LRTP ✓ ✓ ✓ Tampa Bay Regional Transit Authority (TBARTA) LRTP ✓ ✓ ✓ Pinellas County 2040 LRTP ✓ ✓ ✓ Seminole County LRTP & CIP, Seminole County, FL ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Pine Street Extension, Sarasota, FL ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Jacaranda Boulevard-Border Road, Sarasota County, FL ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Carlton Reserve Primary Access Road, Sarasota County, FL ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Southwest Florida International Airport, Fort Myers, FL ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Miscellaneous Water Projects, Pasco County, FL ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Water and Wastewater Program, City of Cocoa, FL ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Water Capital Improvement Program, City of Jacksonville, FL ✓ ✓ ✓ Water and Wastewater Program, City of Gainesville, FL ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Water Planning, City of Leesburg, FL ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Reedy Creek Energy Services, Orlando, FL ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ 11.C.4 Packet Pg. 373 Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 SECTION 2 Certified Minority Business Enterprise 11.C.4 Packet Pg. 374 Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt 2-1 SECTION 2 CERTIFIED MINORITY BUSINESS ENTERPRISE Jacobs is not a Certified Minority Business Enterprise, however on a global and local level, we have earned a positive reputation for assisting and protecting the interests of minority businesses to promote competition and encourage free market opportunities for MBEs on our contracts. For the County’s project, we have teamed with Capital Consulting Solutions (CCS), a Naples- based MBE firm to provide MOT and Graphics support on this contract. CCS is pre-qualified by FDOT in categories Highway Design – Roadway; Traffic Engineering and Operations Studies; Traffic Operations Design, and Planning. Prior to founding Capital Consulting in 2018, the firm’s principal, Adam Ahmad, PE, AICP, worked for Jacobs in the firm’s Naples office. Adam worked side-by-side with Bill Gramer and the entire Jacobs Naples- based staff on a daily basis, including work on many projects in Collier County, such as the County’s General Services contracts, Vanderbilt Beach Road, Collier Blvd., Immokalee Road, Oil Well Road, and Tree Farm Road. This established working and personal relationship will result in seamless integration of the resources of Capital Consulting and our team members. 11.C.4 Packet Pg. 375 Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Florida Unified Certification Program Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Certificate of Eligibility CAPITAL CONSULTING SOLUTIONS LLC (PART TIME) MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF 49 CFR, PART 26 APPROVED NAICS CODES: 541330, 541340, 541990, 541690, 238990 Samuel (Sammy) Febres DBE & Small Business Development Manager Florida Department of Transportation 11.C.4 Packet Pg. 376 Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 ANNIVERSARY DATE – Annually on 06/02 The Florida Department of Transportation (Department) has certified, CAPITAL CONSULTING SOLUTIONS LLC (PART TIME) under the Florida’s Unified Certification Program (UCP) as a Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE), in accordance with Title 49 Part 26, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). DBE Certification does not expire. It is contingent upon the firm maintaining eligibility annually through this office. We will notify Owners of their responsibilities in advance of the anniversary date. We have listed the firm in the Florida's DBE Certification Directory, found at the following link: http://www3b.dot.state.fl.us/EqualOpportunityOfficeBusinessDirectory/ Prime contractors and consultants must verify the firm's DBE certification status, and identify eligible work area(s) through the Directory. The Department makes available DBE Support Service Providers, offering managerial and technical assistance at no cost. Contact us at (850) 414-4747 or via email DBECert.Help@dot.state.fl.us with your questions or concerns. Thank you. Samuel (Sammy) Febres DBE & Small Business Development Manager Equal Opportunity Office 11.C.4 Packet Pg. 377 Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Minority Business Certification Capital Consulting Solutions, LLC 07/27/2017 07/27/2019 11.C.4 Packet Pg. 378 Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt SECTION 3 Past Performance 11.C.4 Packet Pg. 379 Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt 3-1 SECTION 3 PAST PERFORMANCE Our proposed project team has a demonstrated record of successful performance on 10 similar roadway projects in the County, and bring this understanding of your preferred methods of project delivery and standards for quality. Just as important, we have the technical expertise and the professional experience gained from our work on these projects which will allow us to be efficient in addressing key challenges affecting project success. As shown in the Project Exhibit (Section 4) and in our project descriptions, the team members proposed to serve the County on the Vanderbilt Beach Road Widening project routinely work together delivering roadway improvement projects for the County, as well as for other Florida clients. Our team’s long history of working together on similar projects provides the County an integrated approach to successfully completing your project, on time and within budget. Unparalleled Knowledge of Collier County We bring an acute understanding of local conditions through our planning, design, permitting, and construction management services. We have provided planning and design services on 10 major roadway design contracts (60+ miles of roadway) and five PD&E studies (40+ miles of roadway). In addition, our Task Order work under General Services contracts has consisted of: Transportation Planning, Traffic Impact Study Reviews, Developer Contribution Agreement Reviews, Roadway Planning, Roadway Designs, Complete Streets, Roundabouts, Intersection Designs, Transit Designs (Bus Shelter Design, Bus Stop Design), 100 miles of Sidewalks and Bike Lanes, 40 miles of Pathways, Boardwalk Designs, ADA Survey’s for 400+ County Facilities, Grant Writing (TIGER, Safe Routes to Schools, EECBG), Bridge Designs, Box Culvert Designs, Pedestrian Bridges, Weir Structural Evaluations, 100+miles of Utility Designs, FDEP Permitting, Drainage Design, SFWMD Permitting, Environmental Surveys (T&E species, wetlands, contamination), USACE Permitting, Consultant Peer Reviews, Pavement Evaluations (1000+ Miles), Site/Civil Plans, Architectural Designs, Facilities Designs (Electrical, Mechanical, HVAC), Landfill Design (Master Planning), Construction Engineering and Inspection and Emergency Response Services. Collier County Randall Boulevard Corridor Study Collier County Palm River Boulevard over Palm River Canal Bridge Replacement Collier County Tree Farm Road Phase II – Post Design Team Member Collier County LAP Funded Golden Gate Collector Sidewalk Design and Post Design Services Collier County LAP funded Sunshine Blvd. Sidewalk d P d t i B id D i Our Team Members have over a decade of experience working together on projects for the County, resulting in an integrated approach to the Vanderbilt Beach Road widening project Green Meadows WTP Expansion BSU Water and Wastewater Master Plan Project BSU Reverse Osmosis WTP Wellheads and Piping Project BSU Lime Softening Water Treatment Plant Improvements BSU Wellfield Expansion Lee County Utilities Reclaimed Water ASR Phase I 11.C.4 Packet Pg. 380 Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 3-2 IMMOKALEE ROAD-COLLIER BOULEVARD INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Collier County, FL COMPLETED: 2017 CONSTRUCTED VALUE: $7.75 million PROPOSED TEAM MEMBERS WHO WORKED TOGETHER ON THIS PROJECT: Bill Gramer, PE, AICP; Ken Wooten, PE; Tom Ross, PE; Bhushan Godbole, PE; Kevin Heldorfer; Adam Ahmad, PE, AICP; DeeAngela Tjikueni, PE; Bill Beddow, PE; Chris Jubran PE; Lev Zilberman; Rick Gorsira; Kennedy Simmonds PE The project consisted of improvements to the Immokalee Road - Collier Boulevard Intersection to provide additional capacity (triple-lefts) to the intersection and extend Collier Blvd north approximately one-half mile. Services included: roadway alternatives analysis, roadway design, drainage design, sidewalks, bike lanes, pathways, Cocohatchee Canal Relocation (ACOE N.W. Permitting), pre-fabricated bridge crossing of Cocohatchee Canal, CR951 box culvert extension, signalization, lighting, utility design (36 inch water main, 30 inch water main (42 inch - 540 LF directional drill), 16 Inch force main, 24 inch reclaimed water main), Coordination with FPL for relocation of transmission and distribution lines. Permitting: SFWMD, ACOE, FDEP), boat ramp design, coordination with adjacent developments, NCH Hospital, CVS. SFWMD Permit included onsite treatment and attenuation as well as compensatory storage within adjacent development to minimize costs and maximize treatment. OIL WELL ROAD WIDENING AND RECONSTRUCTION Collier County Transportation Department COMPLETED: 2012 CONSTRUCTED VALUE: $39.2 million PROPOSED TEAM MEMBERS WHO WORKED TOGETHER ON THIS PROJECT: Bill Gramer, PE, AICP; Scott Bear, PE; Bhushan Godbole, PE; Ken Wooten, PE; Kennedy Simmonds, PE; Tom Ross, PE This project involved the design and permitting for the widening and reconstruction of 11.1 miles of Oil Well Road from Immokalee Road to east of Camp Keais Road.The project scope included widening a two- lane rural section to a four lane and six lane urban section. Our team provided a bridge design report, design, and plans for three bridge replacements, two box culvert extensions, and miscellaneous structures. All three bridge replacements involved three-span AASHTO Type II beam superstructures on conventional pile bents. The bridge lengths are 132 feet, 135 feet, and 150 feet respectively. We performed foundation design and coordinated all the other aspects of the design including QA. Our team also performed Load Rating using LRFR for box culvert classified as bridge culvert. The project included extensive public involvement due to impacts to environmentally sensitive areas as well as heavily developed sections of the corridor. The permitting effort included drainage and environmental impacts as well as wildlife crossings for endangered species such as the Florida Panther. 11.C.4 Packet Pg. 381 Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 3-3 Additional experience in Collier County relevant to this Scope of Services VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD (AIRPORT-PULLING TO COLLIER) DESIGN Managed the widening of 5.5 miles of the existing 2-lane roadway to a 6- lane, urban divided roadway. Project required extensive attention to public concerns regarding local access, circulation, traffic demands, impacts to businesses and residential areas, and aesthetics. Services provided included public involvement, roadway design, drainage, permitting (SFWMD, USACE, FDEP), maintenance of traffic, structural design, environmental surveys, traffic, noise, aesthetics, survey, geotechnical, access management, and utility services. VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD EXTENSION CORRIDOR STUDY Managed a corridor study to investigate the feasibility of extending Vanderbilt Beach Road a distance of ~10 miles. Study led to creation of conceptual new alignment alternatives that would potentially relieve existing congestion and accommodate future traffic volumes. Alternatives were evaluated for their traffic impacts, cost effectiveness, impacts to areas businesses and residents, environmental impacts, and consistency with the Collier County Growth Management Plan. Extensive right-of-way investigations were performed to determine potential impacts of 15 different corridor alternatives. VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD EXTENSION DESIGN (COLLIER TO DESOTO) Managed design of new 10 mile, 6-lane roadway. Responsibilities included providing public involvement, roadway, drainage, permitting, maintenance of traffic, structural design, environmental surveys, traffic, noise, aesthetics, survey, geotechnical, access management, and utility services. PINE RIDGE ROAD (AIRPORT- PULLING TO LOGAN) DESIGN Managed the design for widening Pine Ridge Road from four to six lanes converting the existing rural section to an urban section. The 3.3-mile project included widening Pine Ridge Road through the I-75 interchange. Unique aspect of the project was the redesign of the northbound on and off- ramps to accommodate dual left turn lanes. Services included complete roadway design and permitting services, signal design, roadway lighting, landscaping, traffic studies, and services during construction. COLLIER BOULEVARD III (GOLDEN GATE CANAL TO GOLDEN GATE BOULEVARD) Managed the widening of 4 miles of the existing four-lane, urban divided roadway. Tasks included public involvement, roadway design, drainage, permitting (SFWMD, USACE, FDEP), maintenance of traffic, structural design, environmental surveys, traffic, noise, aesthetics, survey, geotechnical, access management, and utility services. COLLIER BOULEVARD III (US 41 TO DAVIS) DESIGN Managed development of design plans and specifications for widening the existing 4-lane roadway to a 6-lane facility, including four major intersections, for roadway capacity improvements to a 7-mile segment. Also coordinated SFWMD, USACE and FDEP permits. 11.C.4 Packet Pg. 382 Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 3-4 COLLIER BOULEVARD I (CR951) (GOLDEN GATE TO IMMOKALEE) DESIGN Managed this 3-mile corridor that involved widening existing 2-lane roadway to a 6-lane, urban divided roadway. Project required extensive attention to public concerns regarding local access, circulation, traffic demands, impacts to businesses and residential areas, and aesthetics. Services included public involvement, roadway design, drainage, permitting (SFWMD, USACE, FDEP), maintenance of traffic, structural design, environmental impacts, traffic, noise, aesthetics, survey, geotechnical, access management, and utility services. RANDALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR STUDY (IMMOKALEE TO DESOTO) This 5.3 mile stretch of Randall Boulevard is being considered for widening from an existing 2-lane facility to a 4-lane or 6-lane facility depending on traffic needs. The study is comprised of the following elements: public involvement; data collection and projections; development of corridor alternatives; development of evaluation methodology and criteria; analysis and ranking of corridor alternatives; and selection of a preferred corridor alternative. These elements will be individually documented in report form. An Executive Summary Report will also be prepared to provide an overview of the corridor study findings and recommendations. IMMOKALEE ROAD (COLLIER TO 43rd) DESIGN Managed this design project that involved the 8.1-mile widening from two to six lanes (initial construction of four), thereby converting the existing rural section to an urban section. Services provided included complete roadway design, permitting (SFWMD, USACE, FDEP), drainage design, wetland mitigation, 8 miles of 36-inch water main design, 6 miles of 16-inch force main design, signal design, roadway lighting, traffic studies, and services during construction. TREE FARM ROAD PHASE II (DAVILA ST. TO WOODCREST DR.) DESIGN Design for the half-mile segment of Tree Farm Road. This 2-Lane roadway section links four (4) roadways with a new roundabout. The project consists of a new 2-lane new roadway with sidewalks, pathways, bike lanes and a new roundabout. The project included water main and force main design and permitting. The project utilized three (3) adjacent development ponds for stormwater treatment and attenuation. (Permits: SFWMD, ACOE FDEP) Responsibilities included preparation of the design plans in Microstation, public involvement meetings, permitting packages and field calculations. 11.C.4 Packet Pg. 383 Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 3-5 SEMINOLE TRIBE OF FLORIDA (STOF) TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM MANAGER We have provided a variety of assignments similar to those identified in the RPS for the STOF. We provided Transportation Program Management Services for all six reservations in Florida including Hollywood, Tampa, Big Cypress, Brighton, Fort Pierce and Immokalee. Services included plan review, preparation of LRTP, grant writing, safety audits, asset management, pavement evaluations, cost estimating, bid reviews, budget analysis, safety plan, access management and roadway design, work order preparations, RFP preparation services, FDOT, BIA, FHWA coordination, public involvement and planning. Projects/tasks included: • Transportation Program Management • STOF Long Range Transportation Plan (6 Reservations) • Roadway Plan and Estimate Reviews • Reservation-Wide Systemic Safety Analysis • 2014 Infrastructure Analysis Report • Josie Billie Highway Road Safety Audit • Big Cypress Safety Plan • Josie Billie Highway Emergency Sign Package • STOF Reservation Wide Asset Collection • STOF Transportation CIP • ARCGIS Collection Software Design • TTPSF Safety Funds Grant- Coordinated with Federal Highway Administration (Awarded $360,000) • Indian Reservation Roads (IRR) Inventory Update • Transportation Network Study • Transportation Site Impact Procedures IMMOKALEE ROAD (CR 846) AT RANDALL BOULEVARD INTERSECTION, EFFICIENT TRANSPORTATION DECISION MAKING (ETDM) The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), District One initiated a Project Development and Environment (PD&E) study to evaluate proposed improvements at the intersection of Immokalee Road (County Road (CR) 846) and Randall Boulevard (Blvd) in Collier County, Florida. Intersection capacity improvements are needed to accommodate the projected future traffic demand. This PD&E study involves the preparation of a Categorical Exclusion for potential interim at-grade intersection improvement and ultimate grade-separated interchange improvements to meet future travel demand. An Initial Alternatives Technical Memorandum was prepared to document the need for the project, the development of intersection improvement alternatives, and a preliminary comparative evaluation based on engineering constraints, environmental effects and preliminary cost estimates. Constraints included minimizing impacts to canals, access, utilities and right-of-way. Proposed alternatives include at-grade alternatives and grade-separated alternatives to increase the intersection capacity. The results of this study were focused on the following key elements: • Intersection improvements were designed to increase regional transportation network connectivity, reduce crashes, and subsequently, improve the safety of the roadway • Developed means to improve operations on existing evacuation routes • Expanded multi-modal access to pedestrian and bicycle traffic in the area. 11.C.4 Packet Pg. 384 Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 3-6 References Client reference forms for project similar in nature to the scope of the Vanderbilt Beach Road Widening project can be found on the following pages. 11.C.4 Packet Pg. 385 Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Reference Questionnaire Solicitation: 19-7494 Reference Questionnaire for: Jacobs (Name of Company Requesting Reference Information) Bill Gramer (Name of Individuals Requesting Reference Information) Name: Don Scott, Director (Evaluator completing reference questionnaire) Company: Lee County MPO (Evaluator’s Company completing reference) Email: dscott@leempo.com FAX: 239.790.2695 Telephone: 239.330.2241 Collier County has implemented a process that collects reference information on firms and their key personnel to be used in the selection of firms to perform this project. The Name of the Company listed in the Subject above has listed you as a client for which they have previously performed work. Please complete the survey. Please rate each criteria to the best of your knowledge on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 representing that you were very satisifed (and would hire the firm/individual again) and 1 representing that you were very unsatisfied (and would never hire the firm/indivdiual again). If you do not have sufficient knowledge of past performance in a particular area, leave it blank and the item or form will be scored “0.” (Please note, references from Collier County staff will not be accepted.) Project Description: Miscellaneous Intersections Project Completion Date: 2016-present ______________ Project Budget: __$125,000 to date_________________ Project Number of Days: ___730_________________ Item Citeria Score 1 Ability to manage the project costs (minimize change orders to scope). 10 2 Ability to maintain project schedule (complete on-time or early). 9 3 Quality of work. 10 4 Quality of consultative advice provided on the project. 10 5 Professionalism and ability to manage personnel. 9 6 Project administration (completed documents, final invoice, final product turnover; invoices; manuals or going forward documentation, etc.) 9 7 Ability to verbally communicate and document information clearly and succinctly. 9 8 Abiltity to manage risks and unexpected project circumstances. 9 9 Ability to follow contract documents, policies, procedures, rules, regulations, etc. 9 10 Overall comfort level with hiring the company in the future (customer satisfaction). 10 TOTAL SCORE OF ALL ITEMS 94 11.C.4 Packet Pg. 386 Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) Reference Questionnaire Solicitation: 19-7494 Reference Questionnaire for: Jacobs (Name of Company Requesting Reference Information) Ann Mulligan (Name of Individuals Requesting Reference Information) Name: Arlene G. Barnes, PLS, D1 Rail Administrator (Evaluator completing reference questionnaire) Company: Florida Department of Transportation (Evaluator’s Company completing reference) Email: Arlene.Barnes@dot.state.fl.us FAX: N/A Telephone: 863.519.2349 Collier County has implemented a process that collects reference information on firms and their key personnel to be used in the selection of firms to perform this project. The Name of the Company listed in the Subject above has listed you as a client for which they have previously performed work. Please complete the survey. Please rate each criteria to the best of your knowledge on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 representing that you were very satisifed (and would hire the firm/individual again) and 1 representing that you were very unsatisfied (and would never hire the firm/indivdiual again). If you do not have sufficient knowledge of past performance in a particular area, leave it blank and the item or form will be scored “0.” (Please note, references from Collier County staff will not be accepted.) Project Description: CSXT Railroad Bridge Replacement Completion Date: Est. production August 2020 Project Budget: $1,991,091 Design______________ Project Number of Days: 1322 days Item Citeria Score 1 Ability to manage the project costs (minimize change orders to scope). 9 2 Ability to maintain project schedule (complete on-time or early). 9 3 Quality of work. 9 4 Quality of consultative advice provided on the project. 10 5 Professionalism and ability to manage personnel. 9 6 Project administration (completed documents, final invoice, final product turnover; invoices; manuals or going forward documentation, etc.) 9 7 Ability to verbally communicate and document information clearly and succinctly. 10 8 Abiltity to manage risks and unexpected project circumstances. 9 9 Ability to follow contract documents, policies, procedures, rules, regulations, etc. 10 10 Overall comfort level with hiring the company in the future (customer satisfaction). 10 TOTAL SCORE OF ALL ITEMS 94 11.C.4 Packet Pg. 387 Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) Reference Questionnaire Solicitation: 19-7494 Reference Questionnaire for: Jacobs/CH2M/Capital Consulting (Name of Company Requesting Reference Information) Bill Gramer/Adam Ahmad (Name of Individuals Requesting Reference Information) Name: Fabian Lefler (Evaluator completing reference questionnaire) Company:Seminole Tribe of Florida Public Works (Evaluator’s Company completing reference) Email: FabianLefler@SemTribe.com FAX: N/A Telephone: 954.894.1060 Collier County has implemented a process that collects reference information on firms and their key personnel to be used in the selection of firms to perform this project. The Name of the Company listed in the Subject above has listed you as a client for which they have previously performed work. Please complete the survey. Please rate each criteria to the best of your knowledge on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 representing that you were very satisifed (and would hire the firm/individual again) and 1 representing that you were very unsatisfied (and would never hire the firm/indivdiual again). If you do not have sufficient knowledge of past performance in a particular area, leave it blank and the item or form will be scored “0.” (Please note, references from Collier County staff will not be accepted.) Project Description: STOF Transportation Plan Completion Date: 2015 Project Budget: ________$150,000______________ Project Number of Days: ___180_________________ Item Citeria Score 1 Ability to manage the project costs (minimize change orders to scope). 10 2 Ability to maintain project schedule (complete on-time or early). 10 3 Quality of work. 10 4 Quality of consultative advice provided on the project. 10 5 Professionalism and ability to manage personnel. 10 6 Project administration (completed documents, final invoice, final product turnover; invoices; manuals or going forward documentation, etc.) 10 7 Ability to verbally communicate and document information clearly and succinctly. 10 8 Abiltity to manage risks and unexpected project circumstances. 10 9 Ability to follow contract documents, policies, procedures, rules, regulations, etc. 10 10 Overall comfort level with hiring the company in the future (customer satisfaction). 10 TOTAL SCORE OF ALL ITEMS 100 11.C.4 Packet Pg. 388 Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) Reference Questionnaire Solicitation: 19-7494 Reference Questionnaire for: Jacobs (Name of Company Requesting Reference Information) Bill Gramer, PE (Name of Individuals Requesting Reference Information) Name: Don Scott (Evaluator completing reference questionnaire) Company:Lee County MPO (Evaluator’s Company completing reference) Email: dscott@leempo.com FAX: 239-790-2695 Telephone: 239-330-2241 Collier County has implemented a process that collects reference information on firms and their key personnel to be used in the selection of firms to perform this project. The Name of the Company listed in the Subject above has listed you as a client for which they have previously performed work. Please complete the survey. Please rate each criteria to the best of your knowledge on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 representing that you were very satisifed (and would hire the firm/individual again) and 1 representing that you were very unsatisfied (and would never hire the firm/indivdiual again). If you do not have sufficient knowledge of past performance in a particular area, leave it blank and the item or form will be scored “0.” (Please note, references from Collier County staff will not be accepted.) Project Description: __Land Use Scenario Project____ Completion Date: ____September 22, 2014___ Project Budget: ___$223, 000__________________ Project Number of Days: _____420__________ Item Citeria Score 1 Ability to manage the project costs (minimize change orders to scope). 9 2 Ability to maintain project schedule (complete on-time or early). 10 3 Quality of work. 9 4 Quality of consultative advice provided on the project. 10 5 Professionalism and ability to manage personnel. 9 6 Project administration (completed documents, final invoice, final product turnover; invoices; manuals or going forward documentation, etc.) 8 7 Ability to verbally communicate and document information clearly and succinctly. 9 8 Abiltity to manage risks and unexpected project circumstances. 8 9 Ability to follow contract documents, policies, procedures, rules, regulations, etc. 9 10 Overall comfort level with hiring the company in the future (customer satisfaction). 9 TOTAL SCORE OF ALL ITEMS 90 11.C.4 Packet Pg. 389 Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) Reference Questionnaire Solicitation: 19-7494 Reference Questionnaire for: Bill Gramer (Name of Company Requesting Reference Information) Jacobs (Name of Individuals Requesting Reference Information) Name: Fabian Lefler (Evaluator completing reference questionnaire) Company: Seminole Tribe of Florida Public Works (Evaluator’s Company completing reference) Email: FabianLefler@SemTribe.com FAX: N/A Telephone: 954.894.1060 Collier County has implemented a process that collects reference information on firms and their key personnel to be used in the selection of firms to perform this project. The Name of the Company listed in the Subject above has listed you as a client for which they have previously performed work. Please complete the survey. Please rate each criteria to the best of your knowledge on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 representing that you were very satisifed (and would hire the firm/individual again) and 1 representing that you were very unsatisfied (and would never hire the firm/indivdiual again). If you do not have sufficient knowledge of past performance in a particular area, leave it blank and the item or form will be scored “0.” (Please note, references from Collier County staff will not be accepted.) Project Description: Josie Billie Highway Improvements Completion Date: _11/2018_______________________ Project Budget: __$300,000_______________________ Project Number of Days: _240 ____________________ Item Citeria Score 1 Ability to manage the project costs (minimize change orders to scope). 10 2 Ability to maintain project schedule (complete on-time or early). 10 3 Quality of work. 10 4 Quality of consultative advice provided on the project. 10 5 Professionalism and ability to manage personnel. 10 6 Project administration (completed documents, final invoice, final product turnover; invoices; manuals or going forward documentation, etc.) 10 7 Ability to verbally communicate and document information clearly and succinctly. 10 8 Abiltity to manage risks and unexpected project circumstances. 10 9 Ability to follow contract documents, policies, procedures, rules, regulations, etc. 10 10 Overall comfort level with hiring the company in the future (customer satisfaction). 10 TOTAL SCORE OF ALL ITEMS 100 11.C.4 Packet Pg. 390 Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) SECTION 4 Project Approach, Willingness to Meet Time and Budget Requirements 11.C.4 Packet Pg. 391 Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt 4-1 SECTION 4 PROJECT APPROACH, WILLINGNESS TO MEET TIME AND BUDGET REQUIREMENTS Our team is ready now to provide all services required to meet the roadway, drainage, utility, lighting, permitting, access management, design and construction challenges associated with widening the existing 4-lane Vanderbilt Beach Road to a 6-lane facility, efficiently and effectively. Our technical approach is based on a comprehensive understanding of existing and proposed site conditions, a detailed review of existing project plans and permits, utility and drainage issues, access management alternatives, constructability issues, extensive time spent reviewing and documenting required modifications and options and identifying the critical path elements of this project. We did not just identify project issues, we provided solutions! Key Project Challenges Successful delivery of the Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project depends on the timely resolution of the following key challenges: Roadway Design Elements Providing roadway geometrics that meet applicable FDOT standards, enhance safety, improve operational efficiency, improve access management, alleviate flooding, and minimize permitting concerns are key to success of the project. In addition, the roadway constructed must maximize the use of existing infrastructure and include the least amount of throw away costs possible. Our technical approach provides several options for the County to consider. Geometric design must consider: • Compliance with FDOT and AASHTO design standards and specifications • Evaluation of all physical constraints encountered – Utilities, Drainage, Conservation Area, Adjacent Development • Maximization of existing infrastructure – Roadway, Utility, Signal, Drainage Access Management Access management is essential to the design of any arterial roadway. Maintaining current access to adjacent businesses, local developments and emergency services will be considered during design. There are two (2) existing median access locations to be re-evaluated. The first, located approximately 1,200 feet west of the Goodlette-Frank Intersection, will need to be evaluated to see if it should remain (Converted to Directional U-Turns). The second median access provides full access to Pelican Marsh. However, a 6-lane facility will require conversion to Dual Directional Lefts (Eastbound Directional Left, Westbound Directional U-Turn). A safe, efficient access configuration must be designed to improve operations and minimize conflict points. Business Locations There are existing businesses adjacent to the project that will need to be considered for access management and construction impacts to avoid potential business damages claims. • Mercato • Galleria Shoppes at Vanderbilt • Olympic Park The existing median drainage will need to be modified to accomodate the proposed raised median. Existing utilities within the median will need to be modified. ARV’s will be relocated a minimum distance of 4 ft offset from curb. 11.C.4 Packet Pg. 392 Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 4-2 Utilities In preparation for this proposal, our team submitted a Utility Design Ticket to help identify utilities that will be affected by the project, giving us a head-start in addressing utility- related issues. Based on our field review and collection of GIS Utility Data, there are four (4) major County Utilities that need to be protected in place or relocated; 20”/24” RCW (PVC), 16”/30” WM, 24”/16” FM (PVC), as well as County FO, Lighting and Signal conduits. In addition, there are numerous utilities (FO, BE, CATV etc.) within the project footprint that may need to be relocated. Advance utility notification letters will be sent to the utility companies immediately upon NTP. Through early identification and resolution of potential conflicts, we will be able to reduce impacts to the design schedule. Upon receiving notice of selection, letters (along with an exhibit depicting the planned improvements) will be distributed to local utilities informing them of the project. Once prepared, 30-percent plans will be sent to the utility companies, so they can confirm the location of their utilities, modify locations shown on the plans, and provide desired locations for relocations and future planned utilities. A Utility Meeting will be held shortly thereafter to discuss potential conflicts and give utility owners sufficient time to begin planning their redesigns (if necessary). Utility Meetings will be held again after 60% Submittal, and Utility Work Schedules will be requested prior to Bid Plans being finalized. Physical utility locates (pot-holing) will be done immediately in certain critical areas to ensure proper location identification. Drainage and Permitting Drainage and stormwater management design must satisfy SFWMD’s water quality and quantity requirements. Permitting for this project will be relatively straight forward and should only require two (2) minor Permit Modifications since the current Permit for the existing Vanderbilt Beach Road is for a 6-Lane Facility. SFWMD Conceptual Permit No. 11-01270-S was approved in December 15, 1994. There are 2 associated existing permit applications. • Application No. 950522-4 is for Phase I (US 41 to Goodlette-Frank Road). Project Area = 31.80 Acres • Application No. 950607-1 is for Phase II (Goodlette-Frank Road to Airport Pulling Road). Project Area = 19.29 Acres. We will arrange a pre-application meeting with SFWMD prior to the 30- percent milestone to discuss concepts for existing drainage facility modifications and conveyance. This will expedite the permitting process by receiving SFWMD feedback prior to establishing the ultimate drainage design. An ACOE Permit will NOT be required. Phase I of the Project consists of: • Basin 1 = 8.04 Acres (11.9 NGVD) (7.0 WSWT) • Basin 2 = 5.79 Acres (11.9 NGVD) (7.0 WSWT) • Basin 3 = 17.97 Acres (11.9 NGVD) (7.0 WSWT) Phase II of the Project consists of: • Basin 4 = 6.86 Acres (11.8 NGVD) (8.0 WSWT) • Basin 5 = 6.84 Acres (11.7 NGVD) (8.0 WSWT) • Basin 6 = 10.15 Acres (11.7 NGVD) (9.0 WSWT) Water Quality was provided for the 6-Lane Facility based on 2.5 Inches times the impervious area within the ROW. • Design Storm 25 Year – 3 Day Event • Design Rainfall 11.70 Inches • Roadway Storm water is conveyed to the Pelican Marsh Surface Water Management System Environmental Issues There are no anticipated issues regarding permitting either from Wetland Impacts (none anticipated) or Threatened and Endangered Species 11.C.4 Packet Pg. 393 Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 4-3 Impacts (none anticipated). Note: This will eliminate the need for ACOE Permitting. Maintenance of Traffic MOT design is a major element that must be considered early in the process. Development of MOT plans must incorporate regional as well as local traffic needs to safely direct traffic through the work zone. Our team will consider the high levels of traffic, especially truck traffic, when developing traffic control schemes that expedite construction in the work zone. The unimpeded, safe movement of emergency vehicles and school bus traffic will be of special concern. FDOT standard indices may be modified to accommodate unique conditions. Temporary signalization may also be required in certain situations. We will work directly with the Collier County School Board to identify school bus routes and keep the Board informed of the construction sequence. A lane-closure analysis will be completed to analyze the nature and volume of traffic, and to determine off-peak hours. This will allow the contractor to complete those operations most affecting roadway capacity when traffic volumes are reduced. Some night-time operations may be necessary to minimize traffic impacts and enable the contractor to complete the work as quickly as possible. The use of black base restricts the number of base options, driving up the cost of the pavement, however this will be an option presented to the County due to the potential to reduce construction time. Note: At this time a standard lime-rock base is anticipated. Signing and Pavement Marking Signing and pavement marking plans will be designed to comply with the requirements established in the latest FDOT Roadway and Traffic Design Standards and the FHWA Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. The principle of positive vehicular guidance and consistency of sign messages will be followed when performing the signing and pavement marking design. Roadside signs will conform to Elder User Guidelines. Lighting The Scope of W ork calls for the replacement of existing lighting along the corridor. The existing turnpike lights will be replaced by LED lights. The existing underground utilities will require the use of spread footers for the foundations. The proximity of Transmission Poles and lines along the south ROW will impact the ability to provide poles along the south side of the roadway. Median lighting will be considered Signalization There are four (4) Signalized intersections within the Project Limits. Proposed improvements are as follows: US 41: No Proposed Modifications Strada Place: No Proposed Modifications Goodlette-Frank Road: • Northbound Goodlette - No Proposed Modifications • Southbound Goodlette - No Proposed Modifications • Westbound Vanderbilt - New Signal Pole and Mast Arm Required (170 MPH Design Loading) • Eastbound Vanderbilt - New Signal Pole and Mast Arm Required if second eastbound left turn lane required (170 MPH Design Loading) Airport Pulling Road: No Proposed Modifications Design Survey Timely and accurate Design Survey is critical to any engineering schedule. Timely completion of required surveying tasks will enable the Team to complete the final geometrics and finish the project on schedule. Coordination The Vanderbilt Beach Road 6-Lane Widening Project must be well- coordinated from the start. Coordination of the design effort with County Staff, SFWMD, FDEP, utilities, adjacent commercial businesses and the public is essential for a successful project. Effective project coordination is the key to avoiding delays and completing the project on schedule. 11.C.4 Packet Pg. 394 Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 ID Task NameStartFinish1VBR 6‐Lane WideningMon 2/4/19Fri 5/8/202Notice to ProceedMon 2/4/19Mon 2/4/193Design SurveyMon 2/4/19Fri 3/29/194GeotechnicalMon 2/4/19Fri 3/29/195County Review Geotech ReportMon 4/1/19Fri 4/19/196Final Geotech ReportMon 4/22/19Thu 4/25/197On‐Site Design Team Field ReviewMon 2/4/19Wed 2/6/198Typical Section PackageThu 2/7/19Wed 2/27/199Phase I 30% SubmittalMon 4/1/19Fri 7/19/1910Prepare 30% PlansMon 4/1/19Fri 6/28/1911Design QA/QCMon 7/1/19Fri 7/5/1912Phase I 30% SubmittalFri 7/5/19Fri 7/5/1913County ReviewMon 7/8/19Fri 7/19/1914Phase II 60% SubmittalMon 7/8/19Fri 12/6/1915Utility Pre‐Design ConferenceMon 7/8/19Mon 7/8/1916Prepare 60% PlansMon 7/22/19Fri 10/11/1917Design QA/QCMon 10/14/19Fri 10/25/1918Phase II 60% SubmittalFri 10/25/19Fri 10/25/1919County ReviewMon 10/28/19Fri 11/8/1920Prepare Permit ApplicationsMon 10/28/19Fri 11/8/1921Submit Permits (SFWMD, D.E.P.)Fri 11/8/19Fri 11/8/1922Permit ReviewMon 11/11/19Fri 12/6/1923Phase III 90% SubmittalMon 11/11/19Fri 1/31/2024Prepare 90% PlansMon 11/11/19Fri 1/3/2025Utility Design ConferenceMon 11/11/19Fri 11/15/1926Prepare Draft SpecificationMon 11/11/19Fri 11/22/1927Design QA/QCMon 1/6/20Fri 1/17/2028Constructability & Biddability ReviewMon 1/6/20Fri 1/17/2029Phase III 90% SubmittalFri 1/17/20Fri 1/17/2030County ReviewMon 1/20/20Fri 1/31/2031Resolution of Permit CommentsMon 12/9/19Fri 1/17/2032Phase IV 100% SubmittalMon 1/20/20Fri 5/1/2033Prepare 100% PlansMon 2/3/20Fri 3/27/2034Design QA/QCMon 3/30/20Fri 4/10/2035Final Specification SubmittalFri 1/31/20Fri 1/31/2036Obtain Final Permits & Utility Work ScheduleMon 1/20/20Fri 4/10/2037County ReviewMon 4/13/20Fri 5/1/2038Bid Plans SubmittalMon 5/4/20Fri 5/8/2039Incorporate County Review commentsMon 5/4/20Fri 5/8/2040Issue Bid Plans, Specification, Quantities & Cost EstimatesFri 5/8/20Fri 5/8/202/47/510/2511/81/171/315/8H2H1H2H1H2H1201920202021TaskSplitMilestoneSummaryProject SummaryInactive TaskInactive MilestoneInactive SummaryManual TaskDuration-onlyManual Summary RollupManual SummaryStart-onlyFinish-onlyExternal TasksExternal MilestoneDeadlineProgressManual ProgressVanderbilt Beach Road6-Lane Widening SchedulePage 1VBR 6-Lane Widening11/12/1811.C.4Packet Pg. 395Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 4-5 Project Schedule Schedule monitoring will consist of reviewing two separate schedules: the target (or control) schedule and the working schedule. The target schedule is the baseline schedule established at the beginning of the project. Approved changes will be the only basis for changing the target schedule. Recognizing that actual performance will never exactly match the original plan, a working schedule will be maintained that documents performance to date and predicts future events. Project Manager, Bill Gramer and task leads will coordinate project activities. Changes will inevitably occur during the course of a project that will affect the schedule. When this happens, Bill will work with County staff so that the change is managed, with the least impact on project schedule and budget. Good schedule control means expediting completion of the project. We will conduct team meetings on a regular basis to discuss key project milestones or any arising challenges. As part of the weekly meeting, we will monitor the status of each task’s progress to avoid time-consuming re-work. We also will meet with each subconsultant bi-weekly to review the as-planned schedule and for a “look-ahead” review to ensure that we stay on schedule. Previous Project Schedule Performance Demonstrated Success Managing Costs on Past County Projects Cost Control We will focus on two critical areas: on-time decision making and top- quality, committed project staffing. To ensure on-time decision making, we will conduct task-specific workshops with County staff to discuss and evaluate project elements. A variety of tools and techniques will assist in establishing cost estimates and in refining those estimates as design proceeds. Specific strategies we will implement to speed completion of this project includes: • Early integration of County staff into the processes, allowing us to evaluate deliverables during development as opposed to milestone submittals, thereby minimizing surprises and reducing late changes. • Quality control, spearheaded by QA/QC team members Lance Decuir and Amy Windom, to provide input throughout the project. Lance and Amy will review all documents as they are produced to reduce unnecessary re-work. • Weekly team meetings to discuss tasks requiring additional manpower, items ready for quality review, and the most efficient approaches to upcoming work tasks. • Close and early coordination with project stakeholders. We recognize the importance of continual cost control. Our in-house Project Controls specialist will assist Bill by providing weekly reports identifying hours worked and staff working on the project, by discipline. Bill is responsible for reviewing the project financials against project status to ensure proper progress is made and the project is invoiced accurately each month. CLIENT EXAMPLE PROJECT SCHEDULE PERFORMANCE Collier County Collier Blvd (Golden Gate- Immokalee, 6-Lane) Completed On- Schedule Collier County Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext. Corridor Study Completed On- Schedule Collier County Vanderbilt Beach Road (6- Lane) Completed On- Schedule Collier County Collier Boulevard Corridor Study (15 Miles) Completed On- Schedule Collier County Immokalee Road (6-Lane) Completed On- Schedule Collier County Pine Ridge Road (6-Lane) Completed On- Schedule PAST PERFORMANCE ON COUNTY PROJECTS BUDGET FINAL COST Collier Blvd (Golden Gate/Immokalee, 6- LN) $1,833,495 $1,833,495 Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext. Corridor Study $599,558 $599,558 Vanderbilt Beach Road (6-Lane) $2,148,868 $2,148,868 Collier Boulevard Corridor Study (15-Miles) $90,000 $90,000 Immokalee Road (6-Lane) $3,205,841 $3,205,841 Pine Ridge Road (6-Lane) $1,125,000 $1,125,000 11.C.4 Packet Pg. 396 Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 4-6 Change orders on previous projects We work with clients during the Scope and Fee development to ensure all required services are considered. This minimizes the need for Change Orders during project execution which can be cumbersome and delay project schedules. The sample Change Orders shown below were for add-on services requested by the Clients as the projects progressed. • Lee County MPO LRTP: Supplemental for $18,840 January 4, 2016 The supplemental work order was approved for additional services to assist the Lee County MPO staff with the preparation of documents for submittal to regulatory agencies, including Florida Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, and Federal Transit Administration. Work included completing the LRTP “checklist” of tasks required by FDOT and supporting Lee County MPO in response. This additional work task resulted in FDOT and FHWA approving the 2040 LRTP document. • Lee County MPO TIGER Grant: Supplemental for $21,400 June 19, 2015. The supplemental work order was approved for additional services to assist the Lee County MPO with fast tracking their Federal TIGER Grant Application for the Lee County Complete Streets Initiative Project within a limited 45-day schedule. The original work order utilized local funding to initiate the grant application and evaluate the feasibility of the submittal. The MPO Board then approved the Supplemental on June 19, 2015 for $21,400 which utilized planning (state) funds allocated in the MPO work program to complete the application. The grant was successful and provided $10-million-dollar for the MPO “Complete Streets” project. Jacobs worked with Alta on this successful grant application. Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) Delivering superior quality service is our key marketplace strategy and is reinforced in every aspect of our business. As part of our Quality Control Program, we assign senior reviewers who are independent of the project and have the experience to provide concentrated, rigorous reviews throughout the project. Formal QC reviews are performed prior to Draft and Final Deliverables. These reviews concentrate on issues of consistency, completeness, clarity, coordination, constructability (when applicable), and cost effectiveness. Our Quality Improvement Program (QIP) is based on the principles of total quality management. Our Quality Assurance Program has established project-related policies, procedures, standards, training and guidelines to ensure a successful project on-time and in budget. To implement these principles, our QIP for the County includes: Project Site Review and Data Collection The Jacobs Team has completed extensive preliminary engineering and site surveys to develop a comprehensive understanding of the physical and environmental aspects of the project. We have conducted numerous field visits and have photo-logged the project area and documented our findings to fully understand the key issues and design constraints. This information has been documented on our Project Approach Exhibit. This Exhibit documents existing conditions with photos. Each photo tells a story and is accompanied by a photo caption which describes issues, challenges, options, etc. pertaining to that location. This Project Approach Exhibit has been developed as an invaluable tool for explaining the project intent, opportunities and constraints in a precise efficient manner. It is an effective way to present project issues and convey an understanding of the project. This exhibit not only provides a snapshot of the project; it gives our team a head-start in the project delivery process. By accomplishing this legwork for the proposal, before the project has begun, the Jacobs Team is prepared to deliver this well- coordinated project on schedule. 11.C.4 Packet Pg. 397 Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 The Intersection of VBR and US 41 will not require modifications as part of this project. Note: County may want to consider relocating the VBR/US 41 Intersection camera in the SE Corner since the view (SB) is currently partially blocked by palm trees. The restrictions due to the Transmission Lines along the south side of VBR will require lighting options such as Median Lighting to be considered. The entrance to the Galleria Shoppes at Vanderbilt (Fontana Del Sol Way) and Marker Lake Development is the approximate beginning of the 4-Lane to 6-Lane improvements. No Median or Development entrance improvements are required at this location. The existing Force Main within the median of VBR will require modifications. The existing Air Release Valves will need to be relocated to the new median location and set a minimum of 4 ft behind curb. Discussions with Utility Department will need to be held early in design to determine any proposed utility relocations/modifications. The existing “Turnpike” Lighting will be replaced by LED Lighting per Scope of Work. The existing underground utilities will require the use of “Spread Footings” in many locations. The entrance to Pelican Marsh (Bay Laurel Drive) will not be affected. However, the median access management will need to be revised to a Dual Directional Left to accommodate the new 6-Lane VBR VBR will Transition from a 6 Lane Facility to a 4-Lane Facility at Strada Place. This is the entrance to Mercato. The two Signal Poles at Mercato was designed to accommodate the ultimate Intersection and will not require modifications. The Mast Arm for the eastbound traffic will have an additional signal head added. The Adjacent Summer Place Residential Development will not be impacted by the proposed project. The expansion to (3) Eastbound travel lanes could begin just east of the entrance. The roadway superelevation begins approximately 250 ft east. The median drainage will be modified (DBI replaced with Manhole) and new curb inlets will be designed adjacent to the westbound median since this section is Super elevated. A 4 ft inside shoulder should be considered/designed to minimize lane flooding. The VBR/Goodlette-Frank Intersection was intended to be designed as a 6-Lane x 6-Lane Intersection. Goodlette Road is designed sufficient however the existing curb lines on VBR east of Goodlette were constructed too narrow to accommodate the Project. Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project 1 1 7 8 9 10 109 8 7 2 2 3 4 5 6 6 54 3 Access Management Alternatives Super Elevated Section -Close Median -Directional (U-Turns) Access Management Alternatives -Directional Lefts 11.C.4 Packet Pg. 398 Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) SECTION 5 Location 11.C.4 Packet Pg. 399 Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt 5-1 SECTION 5 LOCATION Local team members within minutes of County offices and the project site Providing the County with appropriately skilled, highly responsive personnel requires a locally-based team that brings superior technical capabilities and project management experience to meet the unique requirements of this critical project. Our Naples office, located less than 8 miles from the County offices and less than 4 miles to the project site, will serve as the principal and coordinating office for this contract. As needed, we will draw upon technical expertise from our other Florida offices, whose staff has recent and relevant experience providing services on Collier County Transportation Planning, Design and Construction Projects as well as on projects for Collier MPO. Team members, Johnson Engineering, Capital Consulting Services, and Forge Engineering, Inc. are located in the County, a short drive from our Naples office. Our Vanderbilt Beach Road Widening project team has full access to the specialized expertise of our global resources of 76,000 multi-disciplined staff members, ensuring the County that we bring more than sufficient capacity and technical capabilities to meet your schedule and budget requirements. Our sophisticated computer network will make the intra- office transfer of documents and other types of information between our Naples and other Jacobs offices quick and cost-effective. Our “NetMeeting” program and other internet-based services make it possible to host teleconferences and review meetings with remote staff, if required. Approach to management and execution of work Day-to-day management and coordination will be led by Project Manager, Bill Gramer, PE, AICP. Bill has the authority and resources to deliver all services that may be required throughout the preparations of construction documents and related tasks that will be required for this project. Bill has been based in our Naples office and for the last 20 years has served as Project Manager on more than 60 transportation planning, design and construction projects for numerous County Departments. He has also served as project manager or project coordinator on more than 30 general services contracts for Southwest Florida clients, including the County and Collier MPO, Lee County MPO, FDOT District 1, and Seminole Tribe of Florida. Bill’s extensive knowledge of the County makes him the best resource to lead and coordinate the various tasks that will be required to execute and successfully complete this project on schedule and within budget. He will meet regularly face-to-face with our subconsultant partners, resulting in a fully integrated team approach to this project. Project Manager, Bill Gramer, will have full access to all of Jacobs’ resources, both in Florida and nationally, as needed. JACOBS OFFICES IN FLORIDA 11.C.4 Packet Pg. 400 Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 5-2 Project Stakeholders Communication Process Coordination between our team members, County staff, the public, and affected business owners must be consistent and continuous to successfully complete this widening project. Project Manager Bill Gramer will apply proven methods for successfully managing communication, people and resources. Efficient communication between our team and the County is essential to our approach because it establishes project goals and standards for performance early in the project. Communication with your staff will be continuous, utilizing written format (e-mail, memo, letter) as “official direction” to avoid misinterpretations. In addition, proactive communication with the County, the traveling public and affected business owners will help identify issues and concerns that need to be resolved early in the project. Project Kick-off, Planning and Operations A project kick-off meeting will be held with all team members and County staff outlining the path forward. Bill Gramer is responsible for day-to-day coordination, holding regular staff meetings and frequent action item reports to document the actions required. As the project progresses, technical memoranda or monthly progress reports will be submitted to County staff for review. The use of technical memoranda and progress reports has proven to be effective in achieving an orderly flow of work on past projects. This approach also provides concise, detailed data and the ability to track the record of decisions made. We understand the importance of developing a detailed, task specific work plan for this project that provides the appropriate level of management, reporting and communication. Bill will meet with County staff once work is authorized to proceed. At this meeting, we will establish clear lines of communication and review and finalize the project work plan. Planning is crucial to project success. A quality work plan defines all roles and responsibilities. It also describes how team knowledge and skills will be used to meet the project requirements. Development of the work plan is essential because it helps the team work together efficiently. Effective instruction in the work plan eliminates cost overruns, schedule slippages, ineffective personnel assignments and promotes quality results. 11.C.4 Packet Pg. 401 Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 SECTION 6 Recent, Current, and Projected Workloads of the Firm 11.C.4 Packet Pg. 402 Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt 6-1 SECTION 6 RECENT, CURRENT, AND PROJECTED WORKLOAD Available resources and current and projected workload Our team members have served the County on dozens of projects in the last 30 years and are ready to work with you again on this project. We fully understand the potential scope of services requirements and have the resources to begin work immediately. Our team thoroughly understands the process that will be required to accurately complete the tasks outlined in Section 4, Project Approach, and we commit to making the resources available to deliver the Vanderbilt Beach Road Widening project on time and within the budget. Commitment of key team members We have selected our team members for their experience in working on similar projects in Florida, including work for the County and other Southwest Florida clients, their reputation for providing top quality service, and their ability to be committed to this project for its duration. Collier County is a priority client for Jacobs, as many of our staff members are residents of the County. Your success is our success, and we are fully committed to making the place we live the best it can be. As members of the Naples community, our team has a vested interest in quickly and efficiently completing projects that help our County meet its transportation infrastructure goals. Availability of key t eam members We analyzed our existing projects and projected work, as well as that of our subconsultant partners, and can assure the County that we have the depth of staff needed to begin work immediately. The diagram to the right shows key team members’ availability to support this project based on our project schedule in Section 4, Project Approach. 0 20 40 60 80 100 Richard Lundberg, PE Laura Herrero Jared Brown, PE Adam Ahmad, PE, AICP Tom Ross, PE Scott Bear, PE Ken Wooten, PE Kennedy Simmonds, PE Mike Dickey, PE Bill Gramer, PE, AICP Average % Committed through December 2020 % Committed 11.C.4 Packet Pg. 403 Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 APPENDICES 11.C.4 Packet Pg. 404 Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Licenses and Certifications REQUIRED FORMS 11.C.4 Packet Pg. 405 Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening 11.C.4Packet Pg. 406Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.4Packet Pg. 407Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.4 Packet Pg. 408 Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.4 Packet Pg. 409 Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) State of Florida Department of State I certify from the records of this office that JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC.is a Delaware corporation authorized to transact business in the State of Florida,qualified on February 12,1987. The document number of this corporation is P13217. I further certify that said corporation has paid all fees due this office through December 31,2018,that its most recent annual report/uniform business report was filed on April 8,2018,and that its status is active. I further certify that said corporation has not filed a Certificate of Withdrawal. Given under my hand and the Great Seal of the State of Florida at Tallahassee,the Capital,this the Eighth day of April,2018 Tracking Number:CC7135491533 To authenticate this certificate,visit the following site,enter this number,and then follow the instructions displayed. https://services.sunbiz.org/Filings/CertificateOfStatus/CertificateAuthentication 11.C.4 Packet Pg. 410 Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.4Packet Pg. 411Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.4Packet Pg. 412Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.4Packet Pg. 413Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.4Packet Pg. 414Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) Page 1 of 25 E-Verify MOU for Employers Using a Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent | Revision Date 06/01/13 Company ID Number:Client Company ID Number: THE E-VERIFY MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING FOR EMPLOYERS USING A WEB SERVICES E-VERIFY EMPLOYER AGENT ARTICLE I PURPOSE AND AUTHORITY E-Verify is a program that electronically confirms an employee’s eligibility to work in the United States after completion of Form I-9, Employment Eligibility Verification (Form I-9). This Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) explains certain features of the E-Verify program and describes specific responsibilities of the Employer, the E-Verify Employer Agent, the Social Security Administration (SSA), and DHS. References in this MOU to the Employer include the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent when acting on behalf of the Employer. For purposes of this MOU, the E-Verify browser refers to the website that provides direct access to the E-Verify system: https://e-verify.uscis.gov/emp/. You may access E-Verify directly free of charge via the E-Verify browser. Authority for the E-Verify program is found in Title IV, Subtitle A, of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (IIRIRA), Pub. L. 104-208, 110 Stat. 3009, as amended (8 U.S.C. § 1324a note). The Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Subpart 22.18, “Employment Eligibility Verification” and Executive Order 12989, as amended, provide authority for Federal contractors and subcontractors (Federal contractor) to use E-Verify to verify the employment eligibility of certain employees working on Federal contracts. ARTICLE II RESPONSIBILITIES A. RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE EMPLOYER For purposes of this MOU, references to the Employer include the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent when acting on behalf of the Employer. 1.By enrolling in E-Verify and signing the applicable MOU, the Employer asserts that it is a legitimate company which intends to use E-Verify for legitimate purposes only and in accordance with the laws, regulations and DHS policies and procedures relating to the use of E-Verify. 11.C.4 Packet Pg. 415 Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) Page 2 of 25 E-Verify MOU for Employers Using a Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent | Revision Date 06/01/13 Company ID Number:Client Company ID Number: 2. The Employer agrees to display the following notices supplied by DHS (though the Web Services E- Verify Employer Agent) in a prominent place that is clearly visible to prospective employees and all employees who are to be verified through the system: a. Notice of E-Verify Participation b. Notice of Right to Work 3. The Employer agrees to provide to the SSA and DHS the names, titles, addresses, and telephone numbers of the Employer representatives to be contacted about E-Verify. The Employer also agrees to keep such information current by providing updated information to SSA and DHS whenever the representatives’ contact information changes. 4. The Employer agrees to become familiar with and comply with the most recent version of the E-Verify User Manual. The Employer will obtain the E-Verify User Manual from the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent, and will be notified by the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent when a new version of the E-Verify User Manual becomes available. 5. The Employer agrees to comply with current Form I-9 procedures, with two exceptions: a. If an employee presents a "List B" identity document, the Employer agrees to only accept "List B" documents that contain a photo. (List B documents identified in 8 C.F.R. 274a.2(b)(1)(B)) can be presented during the Form I-9 process to establish identity.) If an employee objects to the photo requirement for religious reasons, the Employer should contact E-Verify at 888-464-4218. b. If an employee presents a DHS Form I-551 (Permanent Resident Card), Form I-766 (Employment Authorization Document), or U.S. Passport or Passport Card to complete Form I-9, the Employer agrees to make a photocopy of the document and to retain the photocopy with the employee’s Form I-9. The Employer will use the photocopy to verify the photo and to assist DHS with its review of photo mismatches that employees contest. DHS may in the future designate other documents that activate the photo screening tool. Note: Subject only to the exceptions noted previously in this paragraph, employees still retain the right to present any List A, or List B and List C, document(s) to complete the Form I-9. 6. The Employer agrees to record the case verification number on the employee's Form I-9 or to print the screen containing the case verification number and attach it to the employee's Form I-9. 7. The Employer agrees that, although it participates in E-Verify, the Employer has a responsibility to complete, retain, and make available for inspection Forms I-9 that relate to its employees, or from other requirements of applicable regulations or laws, including the obligation to comply with the antidiscrimination requirements of section 274B of the INA with respect to Form I-9 procedures. a. The following modified requirements are the only exceptions to an Employer’s obligation to not employ unauthorized workers and comply with the anti-discrimination provision of the INA: (1) List B identity documents must have photos, as described in paragraph 6 above; (2) When an Employer confirms the identity and employment eligibility of newly hired employee using E-Verify procedures, the Employer establishes a rebuttable presumption that it has not violated section 274A(a)(1)(A) of 11.C.4 Packet Pg. 416 Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) Page 3 of 25 E-Verify MOU for Employers Using a Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent | Revision Date 06/01/13 Company ID Number:Client Company ID Number: the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) with respect to the hiring of that employee; (3) If the Employer receives a final nonconfirmation for an employee, but continues to employ that person, the Employer must notify DHS and the Employer is subject to a civil money penalty between $550 and $1,100 for each failure to notify DHS of continued employment following a final nonconfirmation; (4) If the Employer continues to employ an employee after receiving a final nonconfirmation, then the Employer is subject to a rebuttable presumption that it has knowingly employed an unauthorized alien in violation of section 274A(a)(1)(A); and (5) no E-Verify participant is civilly or criminally liable under any law for any action taken in good faith based on information provided through the E-Verify. b.DHS reserves the right to conduct Form I-9 compliance inspections, as well as any other enforcement or compliance activity authorized by law, including site visits, to ensure proper use of E-Verify. 8.The Employer is strictly prohibited from creating an E-Verify case before the employee has been hired, meaning that a firm offer of employment was extended and accepted and Form I-9 was completed. The Employer agrees to create an E-Verify case for new employees within three Employer business days after each employee has been hired (after both Sections 1 and 2 of Form I-9 have been completed), and to complete as many steps of the E-Verify process as are necessary according to the E-Verify User Manual. If E-Verify is temporarily unavailable, the three-day time period will be extended until it is again operational in order to accommodate the Employer's attempting, in good faith, to make inquiries during the period of unavailability. 9.The Employer agrees not to use E-Verify for pre-employment screening of job applicants, in support of any unlawful employment practice, or for any other use that this MOU or the E-Verify User Manual does not authorize. 10.The Employer must use E-Verify (through its Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent) for all new employees. The Employer will not verify selectively and will not verify employees hired before the effective date of this MOU. Employers who are Federal contractors may qualify for exceptions to this requirement as described in Article II.B of this MOU. 11.The Employer agrees to follow appropriate procedures (see Article III below) regarding tentative nonconfirmations. The Employer must promptly notify employees in private of the finding and provide them with the notice and letter containing information specific to the employee’s E-Verify case. The Employer agrees to provide both the English and the translated notice and letter for employees with limited English proficiency to employees. The Employer agrees to provide written referral instructions to employees and instruct affected employees to bring the English copy of the letter to the SSA. The Employer must allow employees to contest the finding, and not take adverse action against employees if they choose to contest the finding, while their case is still pending. Further, when employees contest a tentative nonconfirmation based upon a photo mismatch, the Employer must take additional steps (see Article III.B below) to contact DHS with information necessary to resolve the challenge. 12.The Employer agrees not to take any adverse action against an employee based upon the employee's perceived employment eligibility status while SSA or DHS is processing the verification request unless the Employer obtains knowledge (as defined in 8 C.F.R. § 274a.1(l)) that the employee is not work authorized. The Employer understands that an initial inability of the SSA or DHS automated 11.C.4 Packet Pg. 417 Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) Page 4 of 25 E-Verify MOU for Employers Using a Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent | Revision Date 06/01/13 Company ID Number: Client Company ID Number: verification system to verify work authorization, a tentative nonconfirmation, a case in continuance (indicating the need for additional time for the government to resolve a case), or the finding of a photo mismatch, does not establish, and should not be interpreted as, evidence that the employee is not work authorized. In any of such cases, the employee must be provided a full and fair opportunity to contest the finding, and if he or she does so, the employee may not be terminated or suffer any adverse employment consequences based upon the employee’s perceived employment eligibility status (including denying, reducing, or extending work hours, delaying or preventing training, requiring an employee to work in poorer conditions, withholding pay, refusing to assign the employee to a Federal contract or other assignment, or otherwise assuming that he or she is unauthorized to work) until and unless secondary verification by SSA or DHS has been completed and a final nonconfirmation has been issued. If the employee does not choose to contest a tentative nonconfirmation or a photo mismatch or if a secondary verification is completed and a final nonconfirmation is issued, then the Employer can find the employee is not work authorized and terminate the employee’s employment. Employers or employees with questions about a final nonconfirmation may call E-Verify at 1-888-464- 4218 (customer service) or 1-888-897-7781 (worker hotline). 13. The Employer agrees to comply with Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and section 274B of the INA as applicable by not discriminating unlawfully against any individual in hiring, firing, employment eligibility verification, or recruitment or referral practices because of his or her national origin or citizenship status, or by committing discriminatory documentary practices. The Employer understands that such illegal practices can include selective verification or use of E-Verify except as provided in part D below, or discharging or refusing to hire employees because they appear or sound “foreign” or have received tentative nonconfirmations. The Employer further understands that any violation of the immigration-related unfair employment practices provisions in section 274B of the INA could subject the Employer to civil penalties, back pay awards, and other sanctions, and violations of Title VII could subject the Employer to back pay awards, compensatory and punitive damages. Violations of either section 274B of the INA or Title VII may also lead to the termination of its participation in E-Verify. If the Employer has any questions relating to the anti-discrimination provision, it should contact OSC at 1-800-255-8155 or 1-800-237-2515 (TDD). 14. The Employer agrees that it will use the information it receives from E-Verify (through its Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent) only to confirm the employment eligibility of employees as authorized by this MOU. The Employer agrees that it will safeguard this information, and means of access to it (such as Personal Identification Numbers and passwords), to ensure that it is not used for any other purpose and as necessary to protect its confidentiality, including ensuring that it is not disseminated to any person other than employees of the Employer who are authorized to perform the Employer's responsibilities under this MOU, except for such dissemination as may be authorized in advance by SSA or DHS for legitimate purposes. 15. The Employer agrees to notify DHS immediately in the event of a breach of personal information. Breaches are defined as loss of control or unauthorized access to E-Verify personal data. All suspected or confirmed breaches should be reported by calling 1-888-464-4218 or via email at E-Verify@dhs.gov. Please use “Privacy Incident – Password” in the subject line of your email when sending a breach report to E-Verify. 16. The Employer acknowledges that the information it receives from SSA through its Web Services 11.C.4 Packet Pg. 418 Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) Page 5 of 25 E-Verify MOU for Employers Using a Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent | Revision Date 06/01/13 Company ID Number: Client Company ID Number: E-Verify Employer Agent is governed by the Privacy Act (5 U.S.C. § 552a(i)(1) and (3)) and the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1306(a)). Any person who obtains this information under false pretenses or uses it for any purpose other than as provided for in this MOU may be subject to criminal penalties. 17. The Employer agrees to cooperate with DHS and SSA in their compliance monitoring and evaluation of E-Verify, which includes permitting DHS, SSA, their contractors and other agents, upon reasonable notice, to review Forms I-9 and other employment records and to interview it and its employees regarding the Employer’s use of E-Verify, and to respond in a prompt and accurate manner to DHS requests for information relating to their participation in E-Verify. 18. The Employer shall not make any false or unauthorized claims or references about its participation in E-Verify on its website, in advertising materials, or other media. The Employer shall not describe its services as federally-approved, federally-certified, or federally-recognized, or use language with a similar intent on its website or other materials provided to the public. Entering into this MOU does not mean that E-Verify endorses or authorizes your E-Verify services and any claim to that effect is false. 19. The Employer shall not state in its website or other public documents that any language used therein has been provided or approved by DHS, USCIS or the Verification Division, without first obtaining the prior written consent of DHS. 20. The Employer agrees that E-Verify trademarks and logos may be used only under license by DHS/USCIS (see M-795 (Web)) and, other than pursuant to the specific terms of such license, may not be used in any manner that might imply that the Employer’s services, products, websites, or publications are sponsored by, endorsed by, licensed by, or affiliated with DHS, USCIS, or E-Verify. 21. The Employer understands that if it uses E-Verify procedures for any purpose other than as authorized by this MOU, the Employer may be subject to appropriate legal action and termination of its participation in E-Verify according to this MOU. B. RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE WEB SERVICES E-VERIFY EMPLOYER AGENT 1. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees to complete its Web Services interface no later than six months after the date the Web Services User signs this MOU. E-Verify considers your interface to be complete once it has been built pursuant to the Interface Control Agreement (ICA), submitted to E-Verify for testing, and approved for system access. 2. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees to perform sufficient maintenance on the Web Services interface in accordance with the requirements listed in the ICA. These requirements include, but are not limited to, updating the Web Services interface to ensure that any updates or enhancements are incorporated no later than six months after the issuance of an ICA. Web Services E-Verify Employer Agents should be aware that this will require the investment of time and resources. Compliance with the requirements of the ICA must be carried out to the satisfaction of DHS and or its assignees. 3. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees to provide to SSA and/or DHS the names, titles, addresses, e-mail addresses, and telephone numbers of the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent representative who will access information, as well as ensure cooperation, communication, and 11.C.4 Packet Pg. 419 Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) Page 6 of 25 E-Verify MOU for Employers Using a Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent | Revision Date 06/01/13 Company ID Number: Client Company ID Number: coordination with E-Verify. In addition, Web Services E-Verify Employer Agents must provide to SSA and/or DHS the names, titles, addresses, and telephone numbers of its clients and their staff who will access information through E-Verify. Web Services E-Verify Employer Agents must ensure the contact information is updated with SSA and DHS whenever the points of contact change. 4. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees to become familiar with and comply with the E-Verify User Manual and provide a copy of the most current version of the manual to the Employer so that the Employer can become familiar with and comply with E-Verify policy and procedures. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees to obtain a revised E-Verify User Manual as it becomes available and to provide a copy of the revised version to the Employer no later than 30 days after the manual becomes available. 5. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees that any person accessing E-Verify on its behalf is trained on the most recent E-Verify policy and procedures. 6. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees that any of its representatives who will perform employment verification cases will complete the E-Verify Tutorial before that individual initiates any cases. a. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees that all of its representatives will take the refresher tutorials initiated by E-Verify as a condition of continued use of E-Verify, including any tutorials for Federal contractors, if any of the Employers represented by the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent is a Federal contractor. b. Failure to complete a refresher tutorial will prevent the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent and Employer from continued use of E-Verify. 7. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees to grant E-Verify access only to current employees who need E-Verify access. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent must promptly terminate an employee’s E-Verify access if the employee is separated from the company or no longer needs access to E-Verify. 8. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees to obtain the necessary equipment to use E- Verify as required by the E-Verify rules and regulations as modified from time to time. 9. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees to, consistent with applicable laws, regulations, and policies, commit sufficient personnel and resources to meet the requirements of this MOU. 10. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees to provide its clients with training on E-Verify processes, policies, and procedures. The E-Verify Employer Agent also agrees to provide its clients with ongoing E-Verify training as needed. E-Verify is not responsible for providing training to clients of E-Verify Employer Agents. 11. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees to provide the Employer with the notices described in Article II.B.2 below. 12. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees to create E-Verify cases for the Employer it represents in accordance with the E-Verify Manual, the E-Verify Web-Based Tutorial and all other 11.C.4 Packet Pg. 420 Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) Page 7 of 25 E-Verify MOU for Employers Using a Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent | Revision Date 06/01/13 Company ID Number: Client Company ID Number: published E-Verify rules and procedures. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent will create E-Verify cases using information provided by the Employer and will immediately communicate the response back to the Employer. If E-Verify is temporarily unavailable, the three-day time period will be extended until it is again operational in order to accommodate the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent’s attempting, in good faith, to make inquiries on behalf of the Employer during the period of unavailability. If, however, the Web Services interface is unavailable due to no fault of E-Verify, then the three-day time period is not extended. In such a case, the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent must use the E-Verify browser during the outage. 13. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees to ensure that all notices, referral letters and any other materials otherwise including instructions regarding tentative nonconfirmations, will be consistent with the most current E-Verify tentative nonconfirmation notices and referral letters, which are available on E-Verify’s website. 14. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees that any system or interface it develops will follow the steps for creating E-Verify cases and processing tentative nonconfirmations, as laid out in the ICA, this MOU and the User Manual, including but not limited to allowing an employer to close an invalid case where appropriate, allowing an employer to refer a tentative nonconfirmation only when an employee chooses to contest a tentative nonconfirmation (no automatic referrals), and referring a tentative nonconfirmation to the appropriate agency at the time the employer prints the referral letter and provides the letter to the employee. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent understands that any failure to make its system or interface consistent with proper E-Verify procedures can result in DHS terminating the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent’s agreement and access with or without notice. 15. When the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent receives notice from a client company that it has received a contract with the FAR clause, then the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent must update the company’s E-Verify profile within 30 days of the contract award date. 16. If data is transmitted between the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent and its client, then the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees to protect personally identifiable information during transmission to and from the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent. 17. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees to notify DHS immediately in the event of a breach of personal information. Breaches are defined as loss of control or unauthorized access to E-Verify personal data. All suspected or confirmed breaches should be reported by calling 1-888-464- 4218 or via email at E-Verify@dhs.gov. Please use “Privacy Incident – Password” in the subject line of your email when sending a breach report to E-Verify. 18. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees to fully cooperate with DHS and SSA in their compliance monitoring and evaluation of E-Verify, including permitting DHS, SSA, their contractors and other agents, upon reasonable notice, to review Forms I-9, employment records, and all records pertaining to the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent’s use of E-Verify, and to interview it and its employees regarding the use of E-Verify, and to respond in a timely and accurate manner to DHS requests for information relating to their participation in E-Verify. a. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees to cooperate with DHS if DHS requests 11.C.4 Packet Pg. 421 Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) Page 8 of 25 E-Verify MOU for Employers Using a Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent | Revision Date 06/01/13 Company ID Number: Client Company ID Number: information about the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent’s interface, including requests by DHS to view the actual interface operated by the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent as well as related business documents. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees to demonstrate for DHS the functionality of its interface to E-Verify upon request. b. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees to demonstrate, if requested by DHS, that it has provided training to its clients that meets E-Verify standards. Training programs must provide a focused study of the topics covered in the E-Verify User Manual and pertinent Supplemental Guides. Furthermore, training programs and materials must be updated as E-Verify changes occur. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent is encouraged to incorporate information from existing E-Verify materials, including the Enrollment Quick Reference Guide, the E-Verify Employer Agent Client Handbook (formerly known as the Designated Agent Client Handbook), and existing tutorials and manuals into their training program. E-Verify also encourages the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent to supervise first-time use of the E-Verify browser or Web Services interface by its staff and Employer clients as part of any training program. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees to submit its training program materials to DHS for review upon request. Failure to provide adequate training could, in some instances, lead to penalties as described in Article V.F.1. of this MOU. 19. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent shall not make any false or unauthorized claims or references about its participation in E-Verify on its website, in advertising materials, or other media. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent shall not describe its services as federally-approved, federally-certified, or federally-recognized, or use language with a similar intent on its website or other materials provided to the public. Entering into this MOU does not mean that E-Verify endorses or authorizes your Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent services and any claim to that effect is false. 20. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent shall not state in its website or other public documents that any language used therein has been provided or approved by DHS, USCIS or the Verification Division, without first obtaining the prior written consent of DHS. 21. The W eb Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees that E-Verify trademarks and logos may be used only under license by DHS/USCIS (see M-795 (Web)) and, other than pursuant to the specific terms of such license, may not be used in any manner that might imply that the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent’s services, products, websites, or publications are sponsored by, endorsed by, licensed by, or affiliated with DHS, USCIS, or E-Verify. 22. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent understands that if it uses E-Verify procedures for any purpose other than as authorized by this MOU, the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent may be subject to appropriate legal action and termination of its participation in E-Verify according to this MOU. C. RESPONSIBILITIES OF FEDERAL CONTRACTORS The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent shall ensure that the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent and the Employers it represents carry out the following responsibilities if the Employer is a Federal contractor or becomes a federal contractor. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent should instruct the client to keep the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent informed about any changes or updates related to federal contracts. It is the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent’s 11.C.4 Packet Pg. 422 Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) Page 9 of 25 E-Verify MOU for Employers Using a Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent | Revision Date 06/01/13 Company ID Number: Client Company ID Number: responsibility to ensure that its clients are in compliance with all E-Verify policies and procedures. 1.If the Employer is a Federal contractor with the FAR E-Verify clause subject to the employment verification terms in Subpart 22.18 of the FAR, it will become familiar with and comply with the most current version of the E-Verify User Manual for Federal Contractors as well as the E-Verify Supplemental Guide for Federal Contractors. 2.In addition to the responsibilities of every employer outlined in this MOU, the Employer understands that if it is a Federal contractor subject to the employment verification terms in Subpart 22.18 of the FAR it must verify the employment eligibility of any “employee assigned to the contract” (as defined in FAR 22.1801). Once an employee has been verified through E-Verify by the Employer, the Employer may not reverify the employee through E-Verify. a.An Employer that is not enrolled in E-Verify as a Federal contractor at the time of a contract award must enroll as a Federal contractor in the E-Verify program within 30 calendar days of contract award and, within 90 days of enrollment, begin to verify employment eligibility of new hires using E-Verify. The Employer must verify those employees who are working in the United States, whether or not they are assigned to the contract. Once the Employer begins verifying new hires, such verification of new hires must be initiated within three business days after the hire date. Once enrolled in E-Verify as a Federal contractor, the Employer must begin verification of employees assigned to the contract within 90 calendar days after the date of enrollment or within 30 days of an employee’s assignment to the contract, whichever date is later. b.Employers enrolled in E-Verify as a Federal contractor for 90 days or more at the time of a contract award must use E-Verify to begin verification of employment eligibility for new hires of the Employer who are working in the United States, whether or not assigned to the contract, within three business days after the date of hire. If the Employer is enrolled in E-Verify as a Federal contractor for 90 calendar days or less at the time of contract award, the Employer must, within 90 days of enrollment, begin to use E-Verify to initiate verification of new hires of the contractor who are working in the United States, whether or not assigned to the contract. Such verification of new hires must be initiated within three business days after the date of hire. An Employer enrolled as a Federal contractor in E-Verify must begin verification of each employee assigned to the contract within 90 calendar days after date of contract award or within 30 days after assignment to the contract, whichever is later. c.Federal contractors that are institutions of higher education (as defined at 20 U.S.C. 1001(a)), state or local governments, governments of Federally recognized Indian tribes, or sureties performing under a takeover agreement entered into with a Federal agency under a performance bond may choose to only verify new and existing employees assigned to the Federal contract. Such Federal contractors may, however, elect to verify all new hires, and/or all existing employees hired after November 6, 1986. Employers in this category must begin verification of employees assigned to the contract within 90 calendar days after the date of enrollment or within 30 days of an employee’s assignment to the contract, whichever date is later. d.Upon enrollment, Employers who are Federal contractors may elect to verify employment eligibility of all existing employees working in the United States who were hired after November 6, 1986, instead of verifying only those employees assigned to a covered Federal contract. After enrollment, Employers must elect to verify existing staff following DHS procedures and begin 11.C.4 Packet Pg. 423 Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) Page 10 of 25 E-Verify MOU for Employers Using a Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent | Revision Date 06/01/13 Company ID Number: Client Company ID Number: E-Verify verification of all existing employees within 180 days after the election. e.The Employer may use a previously completed Form I-9 as the basis for creating an E-Verify case for an employee assigned to a contract as long as: i.That Form I-9 is complete (including the SSN) and complies with Article II.A.6, ii.The employee’s work authorization has not expired, and iii.The Employer has reviewed the information reflected in the Form I-9 either in person or in communications with the employee to ensure that the employee’s Section 1, Form I-9 attestation has not changed (including, but not limited to, a lawful permanent resident alien having become a naturalized U.S. citizen). f.The Employer shall complete a new Form I-9 consistent with Article II.A.6 or update the previous Form I-9 to provide the necessary information if: i.The Employer cannot determine that Form I-9 complies with Article II.A.6, ii.The employee’s basis for work authorization as attested in Section 1 has expired or changed, or iii.The Form I-9 contains no SSN or is otherwise incomplete. Note: If Section 1 of Form I-9 is otherwise valid and up-to-date and the form otherwise complies with Article II.C.5, but reflects documentation (such as a U.S. passport or Form I-551) that expired after completing Form I-9, the Employer shall not require the production of additional documentation, or use the photo screening tool described in Article II.A.5, subject to any additional or superseding instructions that may be provided on this subject in the E-Verify User Manual. g.The Employer agrees not to require a second verification using E-Verify of any assigned employee who has previously been verified as a newly hired employee under this MOU or to authorize verification of any existing employee by any Employer that is not a Federal contractor based on this Article. 3.The Employer understands that if it is a Federal contractor, its compliance with this MOU is a performance requirement under the terms of the Federal contract or subcontract, and the Employer consents to the release of information relating to compliance with its verification responsibilities under this MOU to contracting officers or other officials authorized to review the Employer’s compliance with Federal contracting requirements. D. RESPONSIBILITIES OF SSA 1.SSA agrees to allow DHS to compare data provided by the Employer (through the E-Verify Employer Agent) against SSA’s database. SSA sends DHS confirmation that the data sent either matches or does not match the information in SSA’s database. 2.SSA agrees to safeguard the information the Employer provides (through the E-Verify Employer Agent) through E-Verify procedures. SSA also agrees to limit access to such information, as is appropriate by law, to individuals responsible for the verification of Social Security numbers or responsible for evaluation of E-Verify or such other persons or entities who may be authorized by SSA as governed by the Privacy Act (5 U.S.C. § 552a), the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1306(a)), and SSA regulations (20 CFR Part 401). 11.C.4 Packet Pg. 424 Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) Page 11 of 25 E-Verify MOU for Employers Using a Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent | Revision Date 06/01/13 Company ID Number: Client Company ID Number: 3. SSA agrees to provide case results from its database within three Federal Government work days of the initial inquiry. E-Verify provides the information to the E-Verify Employer Agent. 4. SSA agrees to update SSA records as necessary if the employee who contests the SSA tentative nonconfirmation visits an SSA field office and provides the required evidence. If the employee visits an SSA field office within the eight Federal Government work days from the date of referral to SSA, SSA agrees to update SSA records, if appropriate, within the eight-day period unless SSA determines that more than eight days may be necessary. In such cases, SSA will provide additional instructions to the employee. If the employee does not visit SSA in the time allowed, E-Verify may provide a final nonconfirmation to the E-Verify Employer Agent. Note: If an Employer experiences technical problems, or has a policy question, the employer should contact E-Verify at 1-888-464-4218. E. RESPONSIBILITIES OF DHS 1. DHS agrees to provide the Employer with selected data from DHS databases to enable the Employer (through the E-Verify Employer Agent) to conduct, to the extent authorized by this MOU: a. Automated verification checks on alien employees by electronic means, and b. Photo verification checks (when available) on employees. 2. DHS agrees to assist the E-Verify Employer Agent with operational problems associated with its participation in E-Verify. DHS agrees to provide the E-Verify Employer Agent names, titles, addresses, and telephone numbers of DHS representatives to be contacted during the E-Verify process. 3. DHS agrees to provide to the E-Verify Employer Agent with access to E-Verify training materials as well as an E-Verify User Manual that contain instructions on E-Verify policies, procedures, and requirements for both SSA and DHS, including restrictions on the use of E-Verify. 4. DHS agrees to train E-Verify Employer Agents on all important changes made to E-Verify through the use of mandatory refresher tutorials and updates to the E-Verify User Manual. Even without changes to E-Verify, DHS reserves the right to require E-Verify Employer Agents to take mandatory refresher tutorials. 5. DHS agrees to provide to the Employer (through the E-Verify Employer Agent) a notice, which indicates the Employer's participation in E-Verify. DHS also agrees to provide to the Employer anti- discrimination notices issued by the Office of Special Counsel for Immigration-Related Unfair Employment Practices (OSC), Civil Rights Division, U.S. Department of Justice. 6. DHS agrees to issue each of the E-Verify Employer Agent’s E-Verify users a unique user identification number and password that permits them to log in to E-Verif y. 7. DHS agrees to safeguard the information the Employer provides (through the E-Verify Employer Agent), and to limit access to such information to individuals responsible for the verification process, for evaluation of E-Verify, or to such other persons or entities as may be authorized by applicable law. Information will be used only to verify the accuracy of Social Security numbers and employment eligibility, to enforce the INA and Federal criminal laws, and to administer Federal contracting 11.C.4 Packet Pg. 425 Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) Page 12 of 25 E-Verify MOU for Employers Using a Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent | Revision Date 06/01/13 Company ID Number: Client Company ID Number: requirements. 8. DHS agrees to provide a means of automated verification that provides (in conjunction with SSA verification procedures) confirmation or tentative nonconfirmation of employees' employment eligibility within three Federal Government work days of the initial inquiry. 9. DHS agrees to provide a means of secondary verification (including updating DHS records) for employees who contest DHS tentative nonconfirmations and photo mismatch tentative nonconfirmations. This provides final confirmation or nonconfirmation of the employees' employment eligibility within 10 Federal Government work days of the date of referral to DHS, unless DHS determines that more than 10 days may be necessary. In such cases, DHS will provide additional verification instructions. ARTICLE III REFERRAL OF INDIVIDUALS TO SSA AND DHS A. REFERRAL TO SSA 1. If the Employer receives a tentative nonconfirmation issued by SSA, the Employer must print the notice as directed by E-Verify. The Employer must promptly notify employees in private of the finding and provide them with the notice and letter containing information specific to the employee’s E-Verify case. The Employer also agrees to provide both the English and the translated notice and letter for employees with limited English proficiency to employees. The Employer agrees to provide written referral instructions to employees and instruct affected employees to bring the English copy of the letter to the SSA. The Employer must allow employees to contest the finding, and not take adverse action against employees if they choose to contest the finding, while their case is still pending. 2. The Employer agrees to obtain the employee’s response about whether he or she will contest the tentative nonconfirmation as soon as possible after the Employer receives the tentative nonconfirmation. Only the employee may determine whether he or she will contest the tentative nonconfirmation. 3. After a tentative nonconfirmation, the Employer will refer employees to SSA field offices only as directed by E-Verify. The Employer must record the case verification number, review the employee information submitted to E-Verify to identify any errors, and find out whether the employee contests the tentative nonconfirmation. The Employer will transmit the Social Security number, or any other corrected employee information that SSA requests, to SSA for verification again if this review indicates a need to do so. 4. The Employer will instruct the employee to visit an SSA office within eight Federal Government work days. SSA will electronically transmit the result of the referral to the Employer within 10 Federal Government work days of the referral unless it determines that more than 10 days is necessary. 5. While waiting for case results, the Employer agrees to check the E-Verify system regularly for case updates. 6. The Employer agrees not to ask the employee to obtain a printout from the Social Security 11.C.4 Packet Pg. 426 Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) Page 13 of 25 E-Verify MOU for Employers Using a Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent | Revision Date 06/01/13 Company ID Number:Client Company ID Number: Administration number database (the Numident) or other written verification of the SSN from the SSA. B. REFERRAL TO DHS 1. If the Employer receives a tentative nonconfirmation issued by DHS, the Employer must promptly notify employees in private of the finding and provide them with the notice and letter containing information specific to the employee’s E-Verify case. The Employer also agrees to provide both the English and the translated notice and letter for employees with limited English proficiency to employees. The Employer must allow employees to contest the finding, and not take adverse action against employees if they choose to contest the finding, while their case is still pending. 2. The Employer agrees to obtain the employee’s response about whether he or she will contest the tentative nonconfirmation as soon as possible after the Employer receives the tentative nonconfirmation. Only the employee may determine whether he or she will contest the tentative nonconfirmation. 3. The Employer agrees to refer individuals to DHS only when the employee chooses to contest a tentative nonconfirmation. 4. If the employee contests a tentative nonconfirmation issued by DHS, the Employer will instruct the employee to contact DHS through its toll-free hotline (as found on the referral letter) within eight Federal Government work days. 5. If the Employer finds a photo mismatch, the Employer must provide the photo mismatch tentative nonconfirmation notice and follow the instructions outlined in paragraph 1 of this section for tentative nonconfirmations, generally. 6. The Employer agrees that if an employee contests a tentative nonconfirmation based upon a photo mismatch, the Employer will send a copy of the employee’s Form I-551, Form I-766, U.S. Passport, or passport card to DHS for review by: a. Scanning and uploading the document, or b. Sending a photocopy of the document by express mail (furnished and paid for by the employer). 7. The Employer understands that if it cannot determine whether there is a photo match/mismatch, the Employer must forward the employee’s documentation to DHS as described in the preceding paragraph. The Employer agrees to resolve the case as specified by the DHS representative who will determine the photo match or mismatch. 8. DHS will electronically transmit the result of the referral to the Employer within 10 Federal Government work days of the referral unless it determines that more than 10 days is necessary. 9. While waiting for case results, the Employer agrees to check the E-Verify system regularly for case updates. 11.C.4 Packet Pg. 427 Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) Page 14 of 25 E-Verify MOU for Employers Using a Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent | Revision Date 06/01/13 Company ID Number: Client Company ID Number: ARTICLE IV SERVICE PROVISIONS A. NO SERVICE FEES 1.SSA and DHS will not charge the Employer or the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent for verification services performed under this MOU. The Employer is responsible for providing equipment needed to make inquiries. To access E-Verify, an Employer will need a personal computer with Internet access. ARTICLE V SYSTEM SECURITY AND MAINTENANCE A. DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS 1.Software developed by Web Services E-Verify Employer Agents must comply with federally- mandated information security policies and industry security standards to include but not limited to: a.Public Law 107-347, “E-Government Act of 2002, Title III, Federal Information Security Management Act (FISMA),” December 2002. b.Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Memorandum (M-10-15), “FY 2010 Reporting Instructions for the Federal Information Security Management Act and Agency Privacy Management,” April 2010. c.National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Special Publication (SP) and Federal Information Processing Standards Publication (FIPS). d.International Organization for Standardization/International Electrotechnical Commission (ISO/IEC) 27002, Information Technology — Security Techniques — Code of Practice for Information Security Management. 2.The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees to update its Web Services interface to reflect system enhancements within six months from the date DHS notifies the Web Services User of the system update. The Web Services User will receive notice from DHS in the form of an Interface Control Agreement (ICA). The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees to institute changes to its interface as identified in the ICA, including all functionality identified and all data elements detailed therein. 3.The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees to demonstrate progress of its efforts to update its Web Services interface if and when DHS requests such progress reports. 4.The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent acknowledges that if its system enhancements are not completed to the satisfaction of DHS or its assignees within six months from the date DHS notifies the Web Services User of the system update, then the Web Services User’s E-Verify account may be suspended, and support for previous releases of E-Verify may no longer be available to the Web Services User. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent also acknowledges that DHS may suspend the Web Services User’s account after the six-month period has elapsed. 5.The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees to incorporate error handling logic into its 11.C.4 Packet Pg. 428 Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) Page 15 of 25 E-Verify MOU for Employers Using a Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent | Revision Date 06/01/13 Company ID Number: Client Company ID Number: development or software to accommodate and act in a timely fashion should an error code be returned. 6. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees to complete the technical requirements testing which is confirmed upon receiving approval of test data and connectivity between the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent and DHS. 7. DHS will not reimburse any Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent or software developer who has expended resources in the development or maintenance of a Web Services interface if that party is unable, or becomes unable, to meet any of the requirements set forth in this MOU. 8. Housing, development, infrastructure, maintenance, and testing of the Web Services applications may take place outside the United States and its territories, but testing must be conducted to ensure that the code is correct and secure. 9. If the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent includes an electronic Form I-9 as part of its interface, then it must comply with the standards for electronic retention of Form I-9 found in 8 CFR 274a.2(e). B. INFORMATION SECURITY REQUIREMENTS Web Services E-Verify Employer Agents performing verification services under this MOU must ensure that information that is shared between the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent and DHS is appropriately protected comparable to the protection provided when the information is within the DHS environment [OMB Circular A-130 Appendix III]. To achieve this level of information security, the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees to institute the following procedures: 1. Conduct periodic assessments of risk, including the magnitude of harm that could result from the unauthorized access, use, disclosure, disruption, modification, or destruction of information and information systems that support the operations and assets of the DHS, SSA, and the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent and its clients; 2. Develop policies and procedures that are based on risk assessments, cost-effectively reduce information security risks to an acceptable level, and ensure that information security is addressed throughout the life cycle of each organizational information system; 3. Implement subordinate plans for providing adequate information security for networks, facilities, information systems, or groups of information systems, as appropriate; 4. Conduct security awareness training to inform the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent’s personnel (including contractors and other users of information systems that support the operations and assets of the organization) of the information security risks associated with their activities and their responsibilities in complying with organizational policies and procedures designed to reduce these risks; 5. Develop periodic testing and evaluation of the effectiveness of information security policies, procedures, practices, and security controls to be performed with a frequency depending on risk, but no less than once per year; 11.C.4 Packet Pg. 429 Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) Page 16 of 25 E-Verify MOU for Employers Using a Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent | Revision Date 06/01/13 Company ID Number: Client Company ID Number: 6. Develop a process for planning, implementing, evaluating, and documenting remedial actions to address any deficiencies in the information security policies, procedures, and practices of the organization; 7. Implement procedures for detecting, reporting, and responding to security incidents; 8. Create plans and procedures to ensure continuity of operations for information systems that support the operations and assets of the organization; 9. In information-sharing environments, the information owner is responsible for establishing the rules for appropriate use and protection of the subject information and retains that responsibility even when the information is shared with or provided to other organizations [NIST SP 800-37]. 10. DHS reserves the right to restrict Web Services calls from certain IP addresses. 11. DHS reserves the right to audit the W eb Services E-Verify Employer Agent’s application. 12. Web Services E-Verify Employer Agents and Software Developers agree to cooperate willingly with the DHS assessment of information security and privacy practices used by the company to develop and maintain the software. C. DATA PROTECTION AND PRIVACY REQUIREMENTS 1. Web Services E-Verify Employer Agents must practice proper Internet security; this means using HTTP over SSL/TLS (also known as HTTPS) when accessing DHS information resources such as E-Verify [NIST SP 800-95]. Internet security practices like this are necessary because Simple Object Access Protocol (SOAP), which provides a basic messaging framework on which Web Services can be built, allows messages to be viewed or modified by attackers as messages traverse the Internet and is not independently designed with all the necessary security protocols for E-Verify use. 2. In accordance with DHS standards, the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees to maintain physical, electronic, and procedural safeguards to appropriately protect the information shared under this MOU against loss, theft, misuse, unauthorized access, and improper disclosure, copying use, modification or deletion. 3. Any data transmission requiring encryption shall comply with the following standards: • Products using FIPS 197 Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) algorithms with at least 256- bit encryption that has been validated under FIPS 140-2. • NSA Type 2 or Type 1 encryption. 4. User ID Management (Set Standard): All information exchanged between the parties under this MOU will be done only through authorized Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent representatives identified above. 5. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees to use the E-Verify browser instead of its own interface if it has not yet upgraded its interface to comply with the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) system changes. In addition, Web Services E-Verify Employer Agents whose interfaces do not support 11.C.4 Packet Pg. 430 Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) Page 17 of 25 E-Verify MOU for Employers Using a Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent | Revision Date 06/01/13 Company ID Number:Client Company ID Number: the Form I-9 from 2/2/2009 or 8/7/2009 should also use the E-Verify browser until the system upgrade is completed. 6.The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees to use the E-Verify browser instead of its own interface if it has not completed updates to its system within six months from the date DHS notifies the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent of the system update. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent can resume use of its interface once it is up-to-date, unless the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent has been suspended or terminated from continued use of the system. D. COMMUNICATIONS 1.Web Services E-Verify Employer Agents and Software Developers agree to develop an electronic system that is not subject to any agreement that would restrict access to and use of by an agency of the United States. 2.The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees to develop effective controls to ensure the integrity, accuracy and reliability of its electronic system. 3.The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees to develop an inspection and quality assurance program that regularly, at least once per year, evaluates the electronic system, and includes periodic checks of electronically stored information. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees to share the results of its regular inspection and quality assurance program with DHS upon request. 4.The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees to develop an electronic system with the ability to produce legible copies of applicable notices, letters, etc. 5.All information exchanged between the parties under this MOU will be in accordance with applicable laws, regulations, and policies, including but not limited to, information security guidelines of the sending party with respect to any information that is deemed Personally Identifiable Information (PII), including but not limited to the employee or applicant’s Social Security number, alien number, date of birth, or other information that may be used to identify the individual. 6.Suspected and confirmed information security breaches must be reported to DHS according to Article II.A.17. Reporting such breaches does not relieve the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent from further requirements as directed by state and local law. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent is subject to applicable state laws regarding data protection and incident reporting in addition to the requirements herein. E. SOFTWARE DEVELOPER RESTRICTIONS 1.The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees that if it develops a Web Services interface and sells such interface, then it can be held liable for any misuse by the company that purchases the interface. It is the responsibility of the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent to ensure that its interface is used in accordance with E-Verify policies and procedures. 2.The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees to provide software updates to each client who purchases its software. Because of the frequency Web Services updates, an ongoing relationship between the software developer and the client is necessary. 11.C.4 Packet Pg. 431 Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) Page 18 of 25 E-Verify MOU for Employers Using a Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent | Revision Date 06/01/13 Company ID Number: Client Company ID Number: 3. DHS reserves the right to terminate the access of any software developer with or without notice who creates or uses an interface that does not comply with E-Verify procedures. 4. Web Services Software Developers pursuing software development independent of serving clients as a Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent are not eligible to receive an ICA. At this time, E-Verify does not permit Web Services software development without also being a Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent or Web Services Employer. F. PENALTIES 1. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees that any failure on its part to comply with the terms of the MOU may result in account suspension, termination, or other adverse action. 2. DHS is not liable for any financial losses to Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent, its clients, or any other party as a result of your account suspension or termination. ARTICLE VI MODIFICATION AND TERMINATION A. MODIFICATION 1. This MOU is effective upon the signature of all parties and shall continue in effect for as long as the SSA and DHS operates the E-Verify program unless modified in writing by the mutual consent of all parties. 2. Any and all E-Verify system enhancements by DHS or SSA, including but not limited to E-Verify checking against additional data sources and instituting new verification policies or procedures, will be covered under this MOU and will not cause the need for a supplemental MOU that outlines these changes. B. TERMINATION 1. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent may terminate this MOU and its participation in E-Verify at any time upon 30 days prior written notice to the other parties. In addition, any Employer represented by the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent may voluntarily terminate its MOU upon giving DHS 30 days’ written notice. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent may not refuse to terminate the Employer based upon an outstanding bill for verification services. 2. Notwithstanding Article V, part A of this MOU, DHS may terminate this MOU, and thereby the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent’s participation in E-Verify, with or without notice at any time if deemed necessary because of the requirements of law or policy, or upon a determination by SSA or DHS that there has been a breach of system integrity or security by the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent or Employer, or a failure on the part of either party to comply with established E-Verify procedures and/or legal requirements. The Employer understands that if it is a Federal contractor, termination of this MOU by any party for any reason may negatively affect the performance of its contractual responsibilities. Similarly, the Employer understands that if it is in a state where E-Verify is mandatory, termination of this by any party MOU may negatively affect the Employer’s business. 11.C.4 Packet Pg. 432 Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) Page 19 of 25 E-Verify MOU for Employers Using a Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent | Revision Date 06/01/13 Company ID Number: Client Company ID Number: 3.A Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent for an Employer that is a Federal contractor may terminate this MOU when the Federal contract that requires its participation in E-Verify is terminated or completed. In such cases, the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent must provide written notice to DHS. If the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent fails to provide such notice, then that Employer will remain an E-Verify participant, will remain bound by the terms of this MOU that apply to non-Federal contractor participants, and will be required to use the E-Verify procedures to verify the employment eligibility of all newly hired employees. 4.The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent agrees that E-Verify is not liable for any losses, financial or otherwise, if the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent or the Employer is terminated from E-Verify. ARTICLE VII PARTIES A. Some or all SSA and DHS responsibilities under this MOU may be performed by contractor(s), and SSA and DHS may adjust verification responsibilities between each other as necessary. By separate agreement with DHS, SSA has agreed to perform its responsibilities as described in this MOU. B. Nothing in this MOU is intended, or should be construed, to create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law by any third party against the United States, its agencies, officers, or employees, or against the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent, its agents, officers, or employees. C. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent may not assign, directly or indirectly, whether by operation of law, change of control or merger, all or any part of its rights or obligations under this MOU without the prior written consent of DHS, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. Any attempt to sublicense, assign, or transfer any of the rights, duties, or obligations herein is void. D. Each party shall be solely responsible for defending any claim or action against it arising out of or related to E-Verify or this MOU, whether civil or criminal, and for any liability wherefrom, including (but not limited to) any dispute between the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent or the Employer and any other person or entity regarding the applicability of Section 403(d) of IIRIRA to any action taken or allegedly taken by the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent or the Employer. E. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent understands that its participation in E-Verify is not confidential information and may be disclosed as authorized or required by law and DHS or SSA policy, including but not limited to, Congressional oversight, E-Verify publicity and media inquiries, determinations of compliance with Federal contractual requirements, and responses to inquiries under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). F. The individuals whose signatures appear below represent that they are authorized to enter into this MOU on behalf of the Employer, the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent and DHS respectively. The Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent understands that any inaccurate statement, representation, data or other information provided to DHS may subject the Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent, as the case may be, its subcontractors, its employees, or its representatives to: (1) prosecution for false statements pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1001 and/or; (2) immediate termination of its MOU and/or; (3) possible debarment or suspension. 11.C.4 Packet Pg. 433 Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) Page 20 of 25 E-Verify MOU for Employers Using a Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent | Revision Date 06/01/13 Company ID Number: Client Company ID Number: 11.C.4 Packet Pg. 434 Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) Page 21 of 25 E-Verify MOU for Employers Using a Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent | Revision Date 06/01/13 Company ID Number:Client Company ID Number: Approved by: Employer Name (Please Type or Print) Title Signature Date E-Verify Employer Agent Name (Please Type or Print) Title Signature Date Department of Homeland Security – Verification Division Name (Please Type or Print) Title Signature Date 11.C.4 Packet Pg. 435 Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) Page 22 of 25 E-Verify MOU for Employers Using a Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent | Revision Date 06/01/13 Company ID Number:Client Company ID Number: Information Required for the E-Verify Program Information relating to your Company: Company Name Company Facility Address Company Alternate Address County or Parish Employer Identification Number North American Industry Classification Systems Code Parent Company Number of Employees Number of Sites Verified for 11.C.4 Packet Pg. 436 Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) Page 23 of 25 E-Verify MOU for Employers Using a Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent | Revision Date 06/01/13 Company ID Number: Client Company ID Number: Are you verifying for more than 1 site? If yes, please provide the number of sites verified for in each State: 11.C.4 Packet Pg. 437 Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) Page 24 of 25 E-Verify MOU for Employers Using a Web Services E-Verify Employer Agent | Revision Date 06/01/13 Company ID Number: Client Company ID Number: Information relating to the Program Administrator(s) for your Company on policy questions or operational problems: 11.C.4 Packet Pg. 438 Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.4Packet Pg. 439Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.4Packet Pg. 440Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.4Packet Pg. 441Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.4Packet Pg. 442Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.4Packet Pg. 443Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) File: Collier County –Vanderbilt Beach Road RFP CONTRACT COMMENTS We have reviewed your RFP with enclosed sample terms and conditions and find it to be generally acceptable as the basis for the negotiation of a mutually-agreed-to final contract between the parties. However, we have the following comments concerning the terms and conditions: 1. Indemnity & Liability. We ask that Consultant’s indemnification not include the obligation to “defend” the Owner and that it be on a comparative negligence basis and be limited to injuries or damages resulting from Consultant’s negligence. We further ask that Owner be responsible for injuries which are due to its own negligence, for loss of or damage to its own property and employees, for changes which it directs against Consultant’s recommendations or which have the effect of reducing safety related features, and for injury or damage resulting from the release of or exposure to hazardous/toxic substances. Lastly, we ask that a waiver of consequential and indirect damages be included in the contract. 2. Standard of Care. Consultant shall perform the services to the degree of care and skill of like professionals customarily found in the general area of the project. Implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose are disclaimed. W e request that Consultant’s sole liability with respect to any deficient services be the reperformance of such services at no cost to Owner for a twelve month time period after the performance of such services and that Consultant have no liability for the repair or replacement of equipment or facilities. 3. Insurance. Consultant’s insurance policies do not conform to the ISO Form documents and cannot be adjusted to use same. The Owner will be named as additional insured to the extent of Consultant’s negligent performance of its work for all insurance policies except for professional liability and workers compensation. Consultant shall provide notice of any potential cancellation of its insurance policies in accordance with the terms of such policy which do include a 30 day notice provision. However, due to changes in the insurance industry, the certificate of insurance will not contain a statement specifying the actual notice period as requested. Finally, Jacobs is not willing to provide Owner with a copy of its insurance policies as we consider them to be proprietary and confidential; however, we are willing to provide certificates of insurance evidencing coverage. 4. Delay and Force Majeure. Consultant should not be responsible for any delay in performance of work caused by any unforeseen circumstance or for circumstance beyond the reasonable control of Consultant for such delay not caused by the acts or omissions of Consultant including those of the Owner. Consultant shall be entitled to an extension of time equal to the extent of such delay regardless of the period of delay. Consultant should be entitled to an equitable adjustment in compensation as well for delays in excess of 90 days. 5. Cost Estimates. Any cost estimates provided by Consultant will be on a basis of experience and judgment. Since Consultant has no control over market conditions or bidding 11.C.4 Packet Pg. 444 Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) File: Collier County –Vanderbilt Beach Road RFP procedures, Consultant does not warrant that bids or ultimate construction costs will not vary from these cost estimates. 6. Site Conditions. Consultant shall assume no liability or responsibility for any conditions that exist on the project site including, but not limited to, any hazardous materials, environmental conditions, attractive nuisances, facilities, equipment or other unknown or unforeseen conditions. The Owner shall remain responsible and liable for any such conditions. 11.C.4 Packet Pg. 445 Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) Licenses and Certifications LICENSES 11.C.4 Packet Pg. 446 Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening 11.C.4Packet Pg. 447Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) State of Florida Department of State I certify from the records of this office that JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC.is a Delaware corporation authorized to transact business in the State of Florida,qualified on February 12,1987. The document number of this corporation is P13217. I further certify that said corporation has paid all fees due this office through December 31,2018,that its most recent annual report/uniform business report was filed on April 8,2018,and that its status is active. I further certify that said corporation has not filed a Certificate of Withdrawal. Given under my hand and the Great Seal of the State of Florida at Tallahassee,the Capital,this the Eighth day of April,2018 Tracking Number:CC7135491533 To authenticate this certificate,visit the following site,enter this number,and then follow the instructions displayed. https://services.sunbiz.org/Filings/CertificateOfStatus/CertificateAuthentication 11.C.4 Packet Pg. 448 Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.4 Packet Pg. 449 Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.4 Packet Pg. 450 Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.4 Packet Pg. 451 Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) Florida Department of Transportation RICK SCOTT GOVERNOR 605 Suwannee Street Tallahassee, FL 32399-0450 MIKE DEW SECRETARY www.fdot.gov May 23, 2018 Melody Drake, Inside Sales Manager JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. One Tampa City Center 201 North Franklin Street, Suite 1400 Tampa, Florida 33602 Dear Ms. Drake: The Florida Department of Transportation has reviewed your application for prequalification package and determined that the data submitted is adequate to technically prequalify your firm for the following types of work: Group 2 - Project Development and Environmental (PD&E) Studies Group 3 - Highway Design - Roadway 3.1 - Minor Highway Design 3.2 - Major Highway Design 3.3 - Complex Highway Design Group 4 - Highway Design - Bridges 4.1.1 - Miscellaneous Structures 4.1.2 - Minor Bridge Design 4.2.1 - Major Bridge Design - Concrete 4.2.2 - Major Bridge Design - Steel 4.2.3 - Major Bridge Design - Segmental 4.3.1 - Complex Bridge Design - Concrete 4.3.2 - Complex Bridge Design - Steel Group 5 - Bridge Inspection 5.1 - Conventional Bridge Inspection 5.2 - Movable Bridge Inspection 5.3 - Complex Bridge Inspection 5.4 - Bridge Load Rating Group 6 - Traffic Engineering and Operations Studies 6.1 - Traffic Engineering Studies 6.2 - Traffic Signal Timing 6.3.1 - Intelligent Transportation Systems Analysis and Design 6.3.2 - Intelligent Transportation Systems Implementation 6.3.3 - Intelligent Transportation Traffic Engineering Systems Communications 11.C.4 Packet Pg. 452 Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) www.fdot.gov Group 7 - Traffic Operations Design 7.1 - Signing, Pavement Marking and Channelization 7.2 - Lighting 7.3 - Signalization Group 8 - Survey and Mapping 8.1 - Control Surveying 8.2 - Design, Right of Way & Construction Surveying Group 10 - Construction Engineering Inspection 10.1 - Roadway Construction Engineering Inspection 10.3 - Construction Materials Inspection 10.4 - Minor Bridge & Miscellaneous Structures CEI 10.5.2 - Major Bridge CEI – Steel Group 11 - Engineering Contract Administration and Management Group 13 - Planning 13.4 - Systems Planning 13.5 - Subarea/Corridor Planning 13.6 - Land Planning/Engineering 13.7 - Transportation Statistics Group 14 - Architect Group 15 - Landscape Architect Your firm is now technically prequalified with the Department for Professional Services in the above referenced work types. The overhead audit has been accepted, and your firm may pursue in the referenced work types with fees of any dollar amount. This status shall be valid until March 30, 2019 for contracting purposes. Approved Rates Home/ Branch Overhead Field Overhead Premium Overtime Reimburse Actual Expenses Home Direct Expense Field Direct Expense 114.22% 92.35% Reimbursed No 7.00% 11.54%* *Rent and utilities excluded from field office rate. These costs will be directly reimbursed on contracts that require the consultant to provide field office. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me by email at carliayn.kell@dot.state.fl.us or by phone at 850-414-4597. Sincerely, Carliayn Kell Professional Services Qualification Administrator 11.C.4 Packet Pg. 453 Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) Florida Department of Transportation RICK SCOTT GOVERNOR 605 Suwannee Street Tallahassee, FL 32399-0450 MIKE DEW SECRETARY www.fdot.gov July 3, 2018 Lonnie Howard, President JOHNSON ENGINEERING, INC. 2122 Johnson Street Fort Myers, Florida 33901 Dear Mr. Howard: The Florida Department of Transportation has reviewed your application for prequalification package and determined that the data submitted is adequate to technically prequalify your firm for the following types of work: Group 3 - Highway Design - Roadway 3.1 - Minor Highway Design 3.2 - Major Highway Design Group 6 - Traffic Engineering and Operations Studies 6.1 - Traffic Engineering Studies Group 7 - Traffic Operations Design 7.1 - Signing, Pavement Marking and Channelization 7.2 - Lighting 7.3 - Signalization Group 8 - Survey and Mapping 8.1 - Control Surveying 8.2 - Design, Right of Way & Construction Surveying 8.4 - Right of Way Mapping Group 10 - Construction Engineering Inspection 10.1 - Roadway Construction Engineering Inspection 10.4 - Minor Bridge & Miscellaneous Structures CEI Group 13 - Planning 13.6 - Land Planning/Engineering Group 15 - Landscape Architect 11.C.4 Packet Pg. 454 Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) www.fdot.gov Your firm is now technically prequalified with the Department for Professional Services in the above referenced work types. The overhead audit has been accepted, and your firm may pursue in the referenced work types with fees of any dollar amount. This status shall be valid until June 30, 2019 for contracting purposes. Approved Rates Home/ Branch Overhead Field Overhead Premium Overtime Reimburse Actual Expenses Home Direct Expense Field Direct Expense 153.66% 108.23% Excluded No 5.01% 21.54%* *Rent and utilities excluded from field office rate. These costs will be directly reimbursed on contracts that require the consultant to provide field office. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me by email at carliayn.kell@dot.state.fl.us or by phone at 850-414-4597. Sincerely, Carliayn Kell Professional Services Qualification Administrator 11.C.4 Packet Pg. 455 Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) Florida Department of Transportation RICK SCOTT GOVERNOR 605 Suwannee Street Tallahassee, FL 32399-0450 MIKE DEW SECRETARY www.fdot.gov June 14, 2018 Isaac Rooks, Jr., President I.F. ROOKS & ASSOCIATES, LLC 106 NW Drane Street Plant City, Florida 33563 Dear Mr. Rooks: The Florida Department of Transportation has reviewed your application for prequalification package and determined that the data submitted is adequate to technically prequalify your firm for the following types of work: Group 8 - Survey and Mapping 8.3 - Photogrammetric Mapping Your firm is now technically prequalified with the Department for Professional Services in the above referenced work types. The overhead audit has been accepted, and your firm may pursue in the referenced work types with fees of any dollar amount. This status shall be valid until June 30, 2019 for contracting purposes. Approved Rates Home/ Branch Overhead Facilities Capital Cost of Money Premium Overtime Reimburse Actual Expenses Home Direct Expense 167.77%* 0.396%* Reimbursed No 8.72%* *Interim Rates Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me by email at carliayn.kell@dot.state.fl.us or by phone at 850-414-4597. Sincerely, Carliayn Kell Professional Services Qualification Administrator 11.C.4 Packet Pg. 456 Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) Florida Department of Transportation RICK SCOTT GOVERNOR 605 Suwannee Street Tallahassee, FL 32399-0450 MIKE DEW SECRETARY www.fdot.gov September 14, 2018 Richard Lundberg, Vice President FORGE ENGINEERING, INC. 2224 Trade Center Way, Suite 200 Naples, Florida 34109 Dear Mr. Lundberg: The Florida Department of Transportation has reviewed your application for prequalification package and determined that the data submitted is adequate to technically prequalify your firm for the following types of work: Group 9 - Soil Exploration, Material Testing and Foundations 9.1 - Soil Exploration 9.4.1 - Standard Foundation Studies Your firm is now technically prequalified with the Department for Professional Services in the above referenced work types. Your firm may pursue projects in the referenced work types with fees estimated at less than $500,000.00. This status shall be valid until September 14, 2019 for contracting purposes. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me by email at carliayn.kell@dot.state.fl.us or by phone at 850-414-4597. Sincerely, Carliayn Kell Professional Services Qualification Administrator 11.C.4 Packet Pg. 457 Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) Quick Notes Page 2 11.C.4 Packet Pg. 458 Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Key Team Member Licenses 11.C.4 Packet Pg. 459 Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Licenses and Certifications RESUMES 11.C.4 Packet Pg. 460 Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Bill Gramer, PE, AICP Project Manager; Primary Point of Contact Bill is experienced in a wide variety of transportation and site/civil projects, including planning, traffic, roadway, drainage, utility, GIS, environmental, transit, minor “local” roadways, major urban arterials, state route, and interstate highways. He has served as project manager/project coordinator for 21 different General Service Contracts for Florida Clients. Bill has expertise in project management, roadway design, Design-Build projects and criteria packages, underground utility design/relocations, PD&E studies, and community outreach. He has managed more than 40 Public Involvement meetings and 100+ project stakeholder meetings. Relevant Project Experience Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension, Collier County, FL. Project Manager. Managed the design of a new 10 mile 6-Lane roadway from Collier Boulevard to Desoto Boulevard. Responsibilities included providing public involvement, roadway design, drainage, permitting, maintenance of traffic, structural design, environmental surveys, traffic, noise, aesthetics, survey, geotechnical, access management, and utility services. Project placed “on-hold” at 60% Design in 2008 and restarted in 2018. Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension Corridor Study, Collier County, FL. Project Manager. Managed a corridor study to investigate the feasibility of extending Vanderbilt Beach Road east into the Golden Gate Estates area from Collier Boulevard (CR 951) to DeSoto Boulevard, a distance of approximately 10 miles. The initial objective of the study was to identify existing and future transportation demands along the fast-growing extension corridor. That led to creation of conceptual new alignment alternatives that would potentially relieve existing congestion and accommodate future traffic volumes. Alternatives were evaluated for their traffic impacts, cost effectiveness, impacts to areas businesses and residents, environmental impacts, and consistency with the Collier County Growth Management Plan. Extensive right-of-way investigations were performed to determine potential impacts of 15 different corridor alternatives. Vanderbilt Beach Road (Airport-Pulling Road to Collier Boulevard) Design, Collier County, FL. Project Manager. Managed the widening of 5.5 miles of the existing two-lane roadway to a six-lane, urban divided roadway. The project required extensive attention to public concerns regarding local access, circulation, traffic demands, impacts to businesses and residential areas, and aesthetics. (Permits: SFWMD, ACOE FDEP) Pine Ridge Road Widening, (Airport-Pulling Road to Logan Boulevard) Design, Collier County, FL. Project Manager. Managed the design for widening Pine Ridge Road from four to six lanes converting the existing rural section to an urban section. The 3.3-mile project included widening Pine Ridge Road through the I-75 interchange. One unique aspect of the project was the redesign of the northbound on and off-ramps to accommodate dual left turn lanes. The services provided for this project included complete roadway design and permitting services, signal design, roadway lighting, landscaping, traffic studies, and services during construction. Tree Farm Road Phase II (Davila St. to Woodcrest Dr.) Design, Collier County, FL. Project Manager. Managed the design for the half-mile segment of Tree Farm Road. This 2-Lane roadway section links four (4) roadways with a new roundabout. The project consists of a new 2-lane new roadway with sidewalks, pathways, bike lanes and a new roundabout. The project included water main and force main design and permitting. The project utilized three (3) adjacent development ponds for stormwater treatment and attenuation. (Permits: SFWMD, ACOE FDEP) Collier-Immokalee Intersection Improvements Design, Collier County, FL. Project Manager. Responsible for managing the intersection improvements to the Immokalee Road and Collier Boulevard Intersection which will provide additional capacity to the intersection and extend Collier Blvd north approximately one-half mile. The Intersection improvements were planned and designed to accommodate a “future” SPUI at this intersection. Services included: Roadway alternatives analysis, roadway design, drainage design, sidewalks, bike lanes, pathways, canal relocation, pre-fabricated bridge crossing of canal, box culvert extension, signalization, lighting, utility design (36-inch water main, 30-inch water main (42 inch - 540 lf directional drill), 16-inch force main, 24 inch reclaimed water main), coordination with FPL for relocation of transmission and distribution Lines, permitting with SFWMD, ACOE FDEP). Collier Boulevard (Golden Gate Boulevard to Green Boulevard) Design, Collier County, FL. Project Manager. Managed the widening of 4 miles of the existing four-lane, urban divided roadway. Responsibilities Education B.S., Civil Engineering, Polytechnic University, NY Registrations/ Certifications PE: FL #59090 Certified Planner: AICP (#314390) Years of Experience 30 11.C.4 Packet Pg. 461 Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) Bill Gramer, PE, AICP Page 2 included managing a multi-firm team in providing public involvement, roadway design, drainage, permitting, maintenance of traffic, structural design, environmental surveys, traffic, noise, aesthetics, survey, geotechnical, access management, and utility services. (Permits: SFWMD, ACOE FDEP). Collier Boulevard (US 41 to Davis Boulevard) Design, Collier County, FL. Project Manager. Managed this design project which involved roadway capacity improvements to a 7-mile segment from US 41 to Davis Boulevard. Jacobs provided design plans and specifications for widening the existing four-lane roadway to a six-lane facility, including four major intersections. (Permits: SFWMD, ACOE FDEP) Collier Boulevard (Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road) Design, Collier County, FL. Project Manager. Managed the Collier Boulevard (CR 951) project that involved widening 3 miles of the existing two-lane roadway to a six-lane, urban divided roadway from Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road. Responsibilities included public involvement, roadway design, drainage, permitting, maintenance of traffic, structural design environmental impacts, traffic, noise, aesthetics, survey, geotechnical, access management, and utility services. (Permits: SFWMD, ACOE FDEP) Immokalee Road (Collier Boulevard to 43rd Avenue NE) Design, Collier County, FL. Project Manager Managed this design project that involved the 8.1-mile widening of Immokalee Road from two to six lanes (initial construction of four), thereby converting the existing rural section to an urban section. Services provided for this project included complete roadway design, permitting services, drainage design, wetland mitigation, 8 miles of 36- inch water main design, 6 miles of 16-inch force main design, signal design, roadway lighting, traffic studies, and services during construction. (Permits: SFWMD, ACOE FDEP) North Road Relocation Project at Naples Municipal Airport; Collier County, FL. Project Manager. Managed this project that included the preparation of an Environmental Assessment (EA) for the partial relocation of North Road, which identified and explained viable alternatives, determined if the proposed project had any effects that would necessitate an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), and provided the basis for a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI). A full array of potential impacts – including historic areas, wetlands, parks, endangered species, and environmental justice, were addressed by the project. Webber Street (McIntosh Rd. to Cattleman Rd.) Design, Sarasota County, FL. Project Manager/Coordinator. The 2-mile, four-lane divided collector roadway included bicycle lanes, grassed center median with streetscaping, retaining walls, a 200-foot bridge (Phillippi Creek), major cross-road culverts, privacy walls for residences, intersection improvements, traffic control devices, a closed storm drain system to serve the roadway, stormwater system to intercept runoff from private properties adjacent to the roadway, pond design compensation for filling within the 100-year flood plain, and facilities for mitigation of environmental and neighborhood impacts. Pine Street (Dearborn St. to US41) Design, Sarasota County, FL. Project Manager. The new roadway was designed as a six-lane divided arterial with a majority of the alignment utilizing a rural section. The project involves the preparation of preliminary and final design drawings, geotechnical investigations, obtaining environmental and drainage permits, traffic signal design, preparation of right-of-way plans, and surveying. The project was developed in stages, with the first 3,000-foot section designed to 100% Plans. The project involved extensive wetland mitigation along with mitigation for the Florida Scrub Jay. Lee County Complete Streets Design Build Criteria Packages, Lee County, FL. Project Manager. Responsible for managing the Conceptual Design efforts for the 11 planned projects listed in the Complete Streets Initiative TIGER Grant application. Project included preparation of Conceptual Plans and typical sections which defined project features such as sidewalks, pathways, bike lanes and shoulders, preparation of quantities and project estimates, preparation of a preliminary/conceptual design and construction schedule for evaluation by the Lee County MPO. Miscellaneous Planning Services, Lee County MPO, FL. Project Manager. Led the efforts for a variety of transportation planning and engineering services to the Lee County MPO under Jacobs’ two recent Lee County MPO General Services contract(s) (2009-present). Services have included: roadway planning and conceptual designs, intersection improvement concepts, preparation of grant applications, project cost estimates and coordination with Lee DOT for proposed improvements. Old US 41 Redevelopment Complete Streets Concepts, City of Bonita Springs, FL. Project Manager. This project provided conceptual roadway and storm water designs for Old US 41 from Bonita Beach Road to W. Terry Street. The intent was to evaluate alternatives for roadway, bike lanes, pathways, sidewalks, access management and storm water improvements. The concepts included roundabout designs at Pennsylvania Ave and W. Terry Street. 11.C.4 Packet Pg. 462 Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) Lance Decuir, PE, AICP QA/QC- Roadway Lance Decuir has focused his career on transportation planning and project development and environment studies (PD&E). From transportation policy initiatives at the local level to PD&E studies at the statewide level, he has proven experience in various transportation disciplines including planning, project management, public involvement, transportation engineering, and environmental studies. Lance has prepared/managed transportation plans, alternatives analysis, major investment studies and policies, solutions that address regional mobility, traffic studies, accessibility, and environmental requirements/impacts. He has helped build partnerships at local, state, and federal levels to gain support for organizational programs and projects. He has also managed smaller transportation projects as well as larger, more complex transportation projects that involved large multidisciplinary teams of professionals. Lance’s ability to integrate key stakeholder goals, values, and priorities has allowed him to successfully plan, engineer, and manage a multitude of transportation projects. Relevant Project Experience FDOT District Six, SR 9/SR 817/NW 27th Avenue Premium Transit PD&E Study, Miami, FL. Deputy Project Manager/Engineer of Record. Study that focused on providing multimodal street improvements to accommodate Premium Transit service along the arterials within the project limits. Premium Transit modes to be considered and evaluated include: Bus Rapid Transit (BRT), Light Rail Transit (LRT), and Heavy Rail Transit (HRT/Metrorail) on exclusive lanes/guideways. FDOT District Five, Scenic Highway Signage Assessment, Orlando, FL. Project Manager. Signage assessment for four scenic byways throughout District Five. The task consisted of development of GIS based maps and analysis of signs in the field using ArcCollector. GIS based signing plans were developed using FDOT and MUTCD signing standards. Lance was responsible for overseeing the map creation and intense coordination with municipalities and stakeholders throughout the various scenic byways. FDOT District Five, SR 434 Corridor Planning Study, Longwood, Seminole County, FL. Project Manager. Multimodal corridor planning study on a two-mile stretch of SR 434 in downtown Longwood. The study involved comprehensive multimodal analysis to accommodate for pedestrians, bicycle, and transit in a highly constrained corridor near the SunRail station. Work consisted of concept development of several viable options as well as analysis of parallel corridors within the corridor looking at business, residential, social, and environmental impacts. Potential alternatives consisted of a flyover bridge, intersection modifications, transit enhancements, a pedestrian bridge, and a pocket park. Lance worked closely with FDOT, Seminole County, the City of Longwood and area stakeholders in reaching consensus. FDOT District Six, Freight Logistics Training Program, Miami, FL. Part of the team responsible for preparing training materials for the FDOT District Six Intermodal Systems Development Office. Work consisted of data assembly and research, program design, and the preparation of various program modules emphasizing the importance of freight and logistics in relation to the overall transportation network. Central Florida Expressway Authority (CFX), SR 408 Extension PD&E Study, Orange County, FL. CFX Project Manager. PD&E study to analyze the feasibility of extending the SR 408 in eastern Orange County. The study involved the management and coordination of consultants to ensure that the PD&E process was followed and that all impacts associated with any potential alignments were assessed. Lance worked closely with CFX staff and the consultant team to manage this study. CFX, 2040 Master Plan, Orange County, FL. Assisted the team and CFX in the preparation of the CFX 2040 Master Plan. Work included a visioning process, stakeholder coordination, map production, and report writing. FDOT District Five, Malabar Road (SR 514) Project Development and Environment (PD&E) Study, Malabar, FL. Project Manager. For this PD&E study, Lance was heavily involved in the design and stakeholder coordination. The Malabar Road PD&E Study included the project development and environmental impact analysis for a 4-mile section of roadway in Malabar, Florida (Brevard County). The project included both urban and rural analysis with a heavy emphasis on intersection improvement, access management, and Section 4(f) avoidance. Ultimately, a blend of typical sections and multi modal improvements were recommended. Education MBA, University of Central Florida M.S., Transportation Systems, University of Central Florida B.S., Civil Engineering, Louisiana State University Registrations/ Certifications Professional Engineer: FL #67731 American Institute of Certified Planners (AICP): 2013 (026512) FDOT Trade and Logistics Academy Years of Experience 16 11.C.4 Packet Pg. 463 Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) Lance Decuir, PE, AICP Page 2 City of Palm Bay, Palm Bay Parkway Interchange PD&E Study, FL. FDOT Project Manager. Lance was involved in every aspect of the project from engineering review to environmental and planning coordination with the Federal Highway Administration. The Palm Bay Interchange PD&E studied the construction of a new interchange in southern Brevard County in the City of Palm Bay. The study analyzed the development and potential impacts of a new interchange and new connector road. Classified as environmental analysis, the project involved both engineering and environmental challenges (logical termini, introduction of too much traffic, direct environmental impacts, cumulative and indirect impacts). As part of the PD&E, a land use and comprehensive plan analysis was necessary to ensure that the interchange was truly serving the needs of the surrounding communities. The study also involved in depth analysis of formerly approved Interchange Justification Report (IJR) and traffic numbers associated with the IJR. FDOT District Five, Viera Boulevard Interchange Project Development and Environment (PD&E) Study, Melbourne, FL. Deputy Project Manager. Lance was responsible for public involvement and environmental documentation. The Viera Boulevard Interchange PD&E study included the analysis of a diverging diamond interchange with I-95 in addition to mitigation for Florida Scrub Jays and the American Bald Eagle. Avcon, Inc., Wellness Way Corridor Feasibility and Project Development and Environment Study, Lake County, FL. Project Manager. Environmental study for a private toll facility. The project included alternatives analysis for a new corridor and limited access facility in a rural area of Lake County. Environmental analysis included noise analysis, sand skink mitigation, and wetland impact analysis. Miami-Dade Transportation Planning Organization, Miami-Dade County Bicycle Pedestrian Network Plan, Miami-Dade, FL. Project Manager. This study evaluated the feasibility of using public easements located throughout Miami-Dade County for establishing a network of interconnected bicycle lanes to enhance mobility options. Miami-Dade County Department of Transportation and Public Works (DTPW), Infrastructure for Rebuilding America (INFRA) Grant Application Support, Miami-Dade, FL. Project Manager. Assisted the DTPW with the preparation of the 2017 INFRA grant application for the Northeast Coastal Link SMART Plan Corridor. Northwest Transit Corridor Feasibility Study, Miami-Dade Transportation Planning Organization. Deputy Project Manager for a study to evaluate and assess the feasibility of implementing a premium transit corridor in the northwest area of Miami-Dade County. City of Orlando, General Reese Avenue Pedestrian Study, FL. Project Manager. Pedestrian study on General Reese Avenue in Winter Park. The study included a safety analysis along with an analysis for multiple pedestrian crossings along General Reese Avenue in the vicinity of Blue Jacket Park. The project was a multimodal study and involved coordination with transit agencies and the City of Orlando and complied with ADA standards. FDOT, DRI and Comprehensive Plan Review, Districtwide, FL. As a DRI and comprehensive reviewer for the FDOT, responsible for reviewing DRIs and comprehensive plan reviews in a manner consistent with Florida statutes, to include Florida’s latest growth management legislation. The FDOT planning staff is routinely tasked to assist in the review of developments of regional impact (DRI). The purpose of the DRI and Comprehensive plan review was to manage future development consistent with the proper role of local government to protect the traditional economic base of the state, agriculture, and tourism presence while also encouraging economic diversification, workforce development, and community planning. FDOT, Multi Use Trail PD&E/Feasibility Studies: Lance was the project manager responsible for studying the feasibility of several multi use trail facilities to include: Wekiva Parkway Trail, East Central Florida Regional Rail to Trails, and the Gardenia Trails. Each of these trail studies consisted of its own obstacles to achieving consensus such as: determining ROW on portions of the rail bed that had been privately developed, desires to obtain a trail crossing at the wild and scenic Wekiva River, and coordination and consensus building between local agencies. All of these studies were ultimately successful despite the number of engineering, environmental and public involvement challenges. FDOT, ISB Multimodal Feasibility Study: The ISB multimodal feasibility study involved coordination and a multimodal planning effort between major stakeholders. As part of the coordination effort, land use plans, and transit plans were reviewed for consistency and recommendations were made for improvements to achieve the feel of the community that the stakeholders were searching for. The study had a transit heavy approach including light rail and bus rapid transit analysis. Land use and policy planning was a major emphasis for this feasibility study. 11.C.4 Packet Pg. 464 Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) Amy Windom, PE QA/QC - Drainage Amy has 31 years of experience in stormwater facility planning and design for major transportation projects in Florida. She is proficient in preparing and obtaining environmental permit packages for SFWMD and USACE and has expertise with FDOT design requirements and cost-saving approaches. Am y brings a long and successful history of working with FDOT and FTE on projects. Relevant Project Experience I-4 (Memorial Boulevard to US 98) Design-Build Project, FDOT District One, Polk County, FL. Drainage Engineer. Responsible for floodplain modeling and floodplain permitting issues for widening a 3.5-mile section from four to six lanes. Since two floodplain areas were newly mapped, she modeled the system to determine the 100-year floodplain elevations and to assess the floodplain impacts. With insufficient right-of-way for 1:1 floodplain compensation volume for a side street crossing, she demonstrated no adverse impact by modeling the post-developed condition. She also coordinated the permitting through SWFWMD. Served as QA/QC reviewer for the permit calculations. US 441 Design-Build, FDOT District One, Okeechobee County, FL. Senior Drainage Engineer. Responsible for providing final drainage design/permitting for this $12.7 million project involving the design-build reconstruction of a two-lane roadway to a four-lane urban roadway from CSX Railroad Crossing No. 628062 to north of Cemetery Road. Provided constructability input to allow for a construction cost savings of $300,000 while maintaining the available constrained right-of-way. Project included roadway design, drainage design, permitting, maintenance of traffic, utility coordination/relocation, lighting, signalization, and pavement marking services for a multidisciplinary, multi-firm project. Project involved complex MOT to accommodate existing business access, truck traffic, and school/hospital entrances, pedestrian cross walks, signals, coordination with stakeholders, and basic roadway design elements. I-4 PD&E Study, Section 2, FDOT District Five, Orange, Seminole, and Volusia Counties, FL. Drainage Engineer. Participated in this environmentally sensitive EIS in which pond siting considered downtown development, historic sites, and special basin issues. This 43-mile study limits included downtown Orlando, a crossing of the St. Johns River, and a major systems interchange with SR 408 (East-West Expressway). The project also included an extensive public involvement program involving three counties and more than 10 local municipalities and a full array of potential impacts, including historic areas, wetlands, parks, endangered species, and environmental justice issues. Homestead Extension of Florida's Turnpike (HEFT) PD&E Study, Preliminary Design, Environmental Permits, and Design-Build Criteria Package, Florida's Turnpike Enterprise, Miami-Dade County, FL. Drainage, Permit, and Natural Environment Team Leader. Responsible for the drainage and natural environment teams to complete concurrent A) PD&E study to evaluate the environmental impacts to widen the HEFT from Campbell Drive to US 1 for the eight-lane ultimate configuration, and, B) preliminary design and permit application for an interim six-lane widening from SW 288th Street to SW 216th Street. Work was to support the design-build advertisement. Reviewed the expanded letter of interest for the FTE to shortlist. Responsible for the team performing the drainage and natural environment analyses, and the permit application package. SunTrax Infield Planning and Design, Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise, Orlando, FL. Drainage/Permitting Lead. Managed all aspects of this multidisciplinary team. The project is to develop a world-class testing facility as a designated US DOT proving ground for AV/CV testing. Tasks include: Master Planning, creative workshops, focused outreach to determine industry needs for this emerging technology, concept development, architectural planning and programming, site design, and permitting. Future tasks include: assistance with RFP development for facility Operator, complete the design and construction documents in preparation for construction in FY 2019. Colonial Parkway PD&E Study, Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) and Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise (FTE), Orlando, FL. Drainage/Permitting Lead. CH2M is working with the FDOT and FTE to develop and evaluate alternatives for improvements to East Colonial Drive (State Road 50), a major east-west arterial serving central Florida, heavily impacted by population growth and tourism. Solutions include widening existing SR 50 up to six-lanes for local trips and adding four tolled lanes within the SR 50 R/W to accommodate through trips and aid in emergency evacuation. Project includes PD&E Study and overlapping design to achieve Construction Education M.E., Civil Engineering, University of Florida B.S., Civil Engineering, Pennsylvania State University Registrations/Certifications Professional Engineer: FL #44155 Years of Experience 31 11.C.4 Packet Pg. 465 Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) Amy Windom, PE Page 2 NTP by FY 2021. The project’s public outreach and stakeholder management plan is designed to ensure that context-sensitive transportation solutions identified are consistent with the community vision. We are also identifying potential solutions that embrace emerging transportation technologies such as connected /autonomous vehicles, to improve safety, create mobility choices, and minimize environmental impacts. I-75 (SR 93) at Florida’s Turnpike – Wildwood Interchange (MP 309)-Design-Build Request for Proposal, Phase I (30%) Roadway Plans and 45% Drainage, Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise, Sumter County, FL. Senior Drainage Engineer. Contributed to the drainage and environmental permit considerations to improve the operational efficiency and safety of the interchange through a design-build delivery. Work included preliminary engineering, Request for Proposal using current boiler plate and compiling all attachments and reference documents to secure Design Build Firm (DBF), and assisting Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise with procurement of DBF with project goals to 1) reconfigure the interchange with a dedicated right-hand exit to SB Turnpike from SR 44, separate NB I-75 exit traffic to SR 44 from NB Turnpike mainline traffic, 2) widen I-75 from four-lane to six lanes, 3) accommodate two I-75 truck lanes (one in each direction), and 4) ensure that all improvements accommodate future Turnpike widening from four to six lanes. Key drainage and permit issues include construction of box culverts extensions to maintain flow patterns, avoiding the existing springs (artesian condition), identifying wetland impact potential for work zones, coordinating with separate permit efforts, and new base clearance requirements for roadside ponds. Seminole Expressway/SR 417 Widening Design (Orange/Seminole County Line to North of SR 434), Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise, Seminole County FL. Environmental Permit Team Leader. Served as permitting team lead for multidisciplinary, multiple-subconsultant project to widen existing four-lane SR 417 to six lanes. Key project issues included reconstruction of the bridges over Aloma Avenue, complex design/MOT to minimize horizontal stopping sight distance deficiencies on the mainline (including cross overs), fast-track FDEP permitting, with considerations for new criteria guidelines, and coordination with local agencies to ensure mutual benefit for design implementation. Provided pollutant loading analysis for ponds within the impaired basin for FDEP permitting. Permit received April 2010. Project was performed under fast-track schedule to acquire necessary permits before proposed rule change. I-95 PD&E Study from SR 514 (Malabar Road) to SR 50, and Final Design from SR 514 (Malabar Road) to SR 518 (Eau Gallie Boulevard), FDOT District Five, Brevard County, FL. Drainage Team Leader. Responsible for the drainage analyses and the preparation of Location Hydraulics and Pond Siting Reports for this Categorical Exclusion for the proposed six-lane widening of I-95 for the 43-mile corridor. Recommended ponds had no relocations and involved coordination with Brevard County, the City of Palm Bay, and private developers for potential joint use pond sites, coordination with SJRWMD land managers, and utilities. After CH2M was awarded a subsequent design contract, she provided a bridge between the PD&E study and the final drainage design efforts on the design project. SR 417/Aloma Interchange Efficiency Improvements, Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise, Seminole County, FL. Drainage Advisor and Permit Lead. Project involved the design of efficiency improvements at the Aloma Avenue interchange that included adding turn lanes and improving ramp operations. Documented the improvements met the SJRWMD permit exemptions requirements implemented by FDEP. Design plans were completed and signed/sealed documents were submitted in December 2012. Osceola Parkway/I-4 Interchange Design, FDOT District Five, Orange and Osceola Counties, FL. Drainage Team Leader. Responsible for PD&E through post-design drainage and permitting efforts for the interchange of I-4 on Orange/Osceola County line with significant coordination with Reedy Creek Improvement District and adjacent developments. Provided detailed analysis for storm drain and ditch conveyance systems, new jack and bore storm drain under I-4, stormwater ponds with different design criteria by county per South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD), floodplain impact/compensation, and wetland impact/compensation in addition to the associated plans production and environmental permits (SFWMD and US Army Corps of Engineers [USACE]). PD&E Categorical Exclusion approved in 1998, Final Design Documents completed in 1999, As-Built Pond Certification completed in 2001. I-4 Widening from SR 472 to SR 44, FDOT District Five, Volusia County, FL. Drainage and Permitting Task Leader. Responsible for final design/permitting as a subconsultant. Included dry and wet ponds for open and closed basins, no floodplain impact, storm drain beneath onsite ditches to stay within r/w, jack-&-bore to minimize pond parcels required. CEI reported excellent drainage during Tropical Storm Fay. QA/QC Reviewer, SR 46/ Lake Jesup Bridge Replacement Design-Build Criteria Package Development, FDOT District Five, Seminole County, FL. QA/QC Reviewer. Provided quality reviews of drainage documents used in the approvals needed for the design-build request for proposal/design criteria package. 11.C.4 Packet Pg. 466 Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 1.866.367.4400 | www.johnsonengineering.com Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer Serving as the firm’s director of the utilities market group, Mike has 19 years of experience on utility projects. His project experience includes master planning, hydraulic modeling, design of water distribution systems, wastewater collection systems, irrigation systems, and pumping facilities. Prior to joining Johnson Engineering, Mike worked for a local utility contractor which gave him a unique perspective of how the utilities he designs today come together in the field. With both utility design and construction experience, Mike has a comprehensive understanding of the entire utility development process from planning to design, to permitting through construction. He knows how to develop a design that works both in theory and in practice. Relevant Experience ¬ Phase III-C Utility Improvements, City of Fort Myers, Fort Myers - This project consisted of the design of approximately 60,000 linear feet of gravity sewer main, 40,000 linear feet of potable water main and 21,000 linear feet of storm drain. The project was approximately one square mile in size and involved improvements within existing residential, multi-family, commercial and light industrial properties. In total the project consisted of approximately $21 million of improvements. Johnson Engineering provided survey, design, permitting, hydraulic modeling, bidding assistance and construction phase services. Johnson Engineering also assisted Cella Molnar with public awareness by providing website updates and responding to resident concerns. ¬ Marion Street Force Main Improvements, City of Fort Myers - As project manager, Mike was responsible for the design of approximately 14,000 linear feet of 16-inch force main along various rights of way and connecting at the City’s Central Wastewater Treatment Plant. The project also included design for directional drills under Billy’s Creek, hydraulic analysis to determine necessary upgrades to existing pump stations and construction phase services. ¬ Rehabilitation of Lift Station No. 4 & 27, City of Fort Myers - This project consisted of evaluating and providing recommendations for upgrades on two of its critical wastewater pumping stations servicing the City’s riverfront area and Edison Mall. Instead of performing a typical single pump down test to establish flow and pressure at one moment in time, we recorded flow and pressure for a period of one week by installing pressure transducers on both the discharge piping to record pressure on the force main system, and low pressure recording transducers in the wet well to monitor water levels. The data allowed us to establish an accurate system curve and provide for a higher level of confidence with model results. ¬ Phase 1A Watermain Replacement and Drainage Improvements, Town of Fort Myers Beach – This is a design-build project including watermain replacement and drainage improvements within the Phase 1A residential area on Estero Island. Design included approximately 10,000 linear feet of watermain and 8,000 linear feet of storm sewer. The construction cost is approximately $8 million. Johnson Engineering is providing survey, SUE, utility and drainage design, permitting and coordination during construction. ¬ Southwest 6 & 7 Utility Expansion Project Areas 1 & 2, City of Cape Coral - This project includes providing utility improvements to approximately 1,100 existing residential properties in Cape Coral. Design included approximately 53,000 linear feet of gravity sewer main, 56,000 linear feet of potable water main, 58,000 linear feet of irrigation main and 5,400 linear feet of storm drain improvements. The estimated construction cost for all improvements is $12.5 million. Johnson Engineering is providing the value engineering, design, permitting, bidding assistance and construction phase services. ¬ Gravity Expansion 2, Phase 7, Bonita Springs - This project consisted of the design of approximately 13,000 linear feet of gravity sewer, multiple pump stations, 13,500 linear feet of potable water main and 5,000 linear feet of drainage improvements. The project was located along various neighborhoods in Bonita Springs near Bonita Beach Road that consisted of mainly residential homes. In total the project consisted of approximately $3.5 million in improvements. Johnson Engineering provided survey, design, permitting, hydraulic modeling, bidding assistance and construction phase services. ¬ Aqui Esta Drive, Punta Gorda - This project consisted of the design of approximately 2 miles of roadway, drainage, and potable water and wastewater improvements along Aqui Esta Drive in Punta Gorda. Our team provided the survey, design, permitting, bidding services and construction phase services for all improvements. ¬ Hickory Boulevard Water Main for Bonita Springs Utilities, Inc, Bonita Springs - This project consisted of the design for replacing approximately 12,500 linear feet of 16” water main along Hickory Boulevard in Bonita Springs. Johnson Engineering provided the survey, design, permitting, bidding services and MICHAEL DICKEY, P.E. Utility Task Lead mdickey@johnsoneng.com 239.461.2455 Years Experience 19 years Education/Training B.S. Civil Engineering (1997), University of South Florida Licensing & Registration Florida Professional Engineer, License No. 60057 Professional Affiliations American Water Works Association 11.C.4 Packet Pg. 467 Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 1.866.367.4400 | www.johnsonengineering.com Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer construction phase services. Johnson Engineering also assisted BSU with public awareness by holding block meetings to discuss construction activities and responding to resident concerns. ¬ San Carlos Estates Water Main (Design-Build), Bonita Springs Utilities - This project consisted of the design for replacing approximately 85,000 linear feet of potable water main within the San Carlos Estates subdivision located in Bonita Springs. San Carlos Estates consist of approximately a 1.5 square mile with 900 residential lots. Johnson Engineering was responsible for the design, survey, and permitting and construction administration for this project. The design also included two miles of 24” force main and a directional drill to cross the existing railroad tracks near the Strike Lane and Business 41 intersection. The approximate cost of construction for this project was $3.8 million. ¬ RSW 24” Water Transmission Line from Fiddlesticks to Old Gladiolus – This project consisted the route analysis, preliminary design, survey, subsurface utility engineering (SUE), design, permitting, bidding assistance and construction phase services for approximately 25,000 linear feet of water transmission line from Fiddlesticks to Old Gladiolus. The scope also included design for a 30”directional under US 41 just south of Six Mile Cypress. 11.C.4 Packet Pg. 468 Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) Kennedy Simmonds, PE Drainage Task Lead Kennedy has more than 16 years of experience as a project engineer in the areas of stormwater management systems, drainage, permitting, wastewater treatment, utilities, multi-use trail design, and land development projects. He has Drainage and permitting experience on a wide range of projects for FDOT, including PD&E studies. Kennedy is proficient in applications such as Microstation V8, XM and V8i including Geopak Suite Drainage and Site Applications, Hec-HMS v3.5, adICPR v2.01 and v3, Modret v6.1, PONDS v3.3, HY8 v7.0, Autocad and Land Desktop Civil 3D 2008 and previous versions. Relevant Project Experience Oil Well Road Widening Design, Collier County, FL. Design Team Drainage Engineer. Provided drainage engineering services for this project which included an 11.3-mile reconstruction of Oil Well Road from Immokalee Road to Camp Keais Road. The project addressed a bridge design over Camp Keais Strand, solutions for a wildlife crossing, and minimization of wetland and floodplain impacts throughout the Camp Keais Strand. Other design issues included reducing the right-of-way impacts to property owners along the roadway corridor, implementing erosion and sediment control measures to maintain current water quality levels and minimizing impacts to wildlife in the area. HEFT Widening from SW 288th St (Biscayne Drive) to SW 216th St (Hainlin Mill Road), Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise, Miami-Dade County, FL. Drainage Lead Engineer. Responsible for stormwater drainage analysis and design of dry detention systems for treatment purposes, which avoided wetland impact and did not require additional right-of-way. This included generating report calculations for water quality analysis, pond design, and analysis for each system, preparation of plans and all drainage related permit applications. Project was to widen existing four-lane HEFT to six lanes while accommodating future eight-lane section in the stormwater design. Key project issues included reconstruction of the bridges over SW 137th Ave (Tallahassee Rd) and SW 112th Avenue (Allapattah Road), FDEP permitting with new criteria guidelines and coordination with local agencies to ensure mutual benefit for design implementation. Major issues included maintaining existing drainage flow patterns, constructability, and reducing right-of-way impacts to property owners. Widening the Homestead Extension of the Florida’s Turnpike (HEFT) from SW 288th Street to SW 216th Street, Milepost 5 to Milepost 11.8 – Part B - Design-Build Request for Proposal, Phase I (30%) Roadway Plans and 45% Drainage, Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise, Miami-Dade County, FL. Drainage Task Lead. Responsible for stormwater drainage analysis and design of dry detention systems for treatment purposes, which avoided wetland impact and did not require additional right-of-way. This included generating report calculations for water quality analysis, pond design and analysis for each system, as well as preparing the SFWMD permit package. Key project issues include: widening existing four-lane HEFT to six lanes with a widening scheme to accommodate future eight-lane widening. The additional lanes are express lanes that are barrier separated from the general use lanes. Drainage design to secure SFWMD permit with new criteria guidelines, maintaining existing drainage flow patterns, reducing right-of-way impacts to property owners, maintenance of traffic, constructability evaluations to ensure bridge widening can be accomplished, placement of noise walls throughout corridor, and coordination with local and governmental agencies to ensure mutual benefit for design implementation. Seminole Expressway/SR 417 Widening from the Orange/Seminole County Line to North of SR 434, Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise, Seminole County, FL. Drainage Engineer. Responsible for stormwater drainage analysis and design of five existing dry retention systems with underdrain for treatment, which avoided wetland impact and did not require additional right-of-way. This included generating report calculations for water quality analysis, pond design and storm sewer design and analysis for each system. Project was to widen existing four- lane SR 417 to six lanes while accommodating future eight-lane section. Key project issues included reconstruction of the bridges over Aloma Avenue, complex design/MOT to minimize horizontal stopping sight distance deficiencies on the mainline, FDEP permitting with new criteria guidelines and coordination with local agencies to ensure mutual benefit for design implementation. I-95 Widening Design, FDOT District Five, Brevard County, FL. Drainage Engineer. Provided drainage engineering services for this project which included the inside widening of 12-miles of I-95 in Palm Bay. Runoff is collected in a storm drain system and routed to ponds. Outside ditches are being constructed to collect runoff from existing pavement in lieu of new pavement in order to minimize the impact of pond sites to the public lands and Education B.S., Civil Engineering, University of South Florida Registrations/Certifications Professional Engineer: FL #66357 Years of Experience 18 11.C.4 Packet Pg. 469 Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) Kennedy Simmonds, PE Page 2 wetland/floodplain systems adjacent to I-95. I-95 bisects several wetland systems and crosses over several canals, including the Fellsmere Canal, the C-54 Canal, the South Sottile Canal, and the Main Sottile Canal. Responsible for extensions of several pipes and box culverts were required to meet roadway safety requirements and analysis of floodplain impact to document no compensation pond required. For the environmentally sensitive offsite areas, worked with natural environment team to maximize impact to St. Sebastian River Preserve State Park and avoid Micco Scrub Sanctuary. Seminole Expressway/SR 417 PD&E Study (Orange/Seminole County Line to Reinhart Road), Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise, Seminole County, FL. Drainage Engineer. Assisted with the production of the LHR and PSR for this study to widen from four to eight lanes. Addressed differing criteria from original permits and the current FDEP adopted SJRWMD standards. Project issues included significant environmental interest at Lake Jesup and safety improvements for the Aloma Avenue interchange. A design option for this project was exercised by the Turnpike Enterprise based on successful performance. Preliminary design efforts include the development of a re-evaluation for the project to address interchange concept changes and drainage/permitting modifications. I-75 (SR 93) at Florida’s Turnpike – Wildwood Interchange (MP 309)-Design-Build Request for Proposal, Phase I (30%) Roadway Plans and 45% Drainage, Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise, Sumter County, FL. Drainage Engineer. Responsibilities included developing drainage related criteria for the Request for Proposal document, drainage analysis of base clearance at critical improvement areas along the project and providing an inventory and analysis of the condition of existing box culverts and desktop review of structural viability of proposed extensions. Provided drainage support to roadway design team to address environmental permitting and construction concerns and reviewed previously designed permit plans and drainage documents for consistency with any modifications. Project involved reconfiguration of the interchange to provide a dedicated right-hand exit, separate NB I-75 exit, and widening of I-75 from existing four-lane to six lanes. I-95/Palm Bay Parkway South PD&E Study, FDOT District Five, Brevard County, FL. Drainage Engineer. Evaluated new alignment pond and floodplain alternatives and completing LHR, PSR, and Water Quality Impact Evaluation (WQIE) documents. Assisted with evaluation matrix, cost information, and right-of-way files. Includes coordination with property owners. Completed alternatives alignment public meeting. I-95 PD&E Study (CR 512 to SR 514), FDOT Districts Four and Five, Indian River and Brevard Counties, FL. Drainage Engineer. Provided drainage analysis and support for the proposed widening of I-95 by adding an additional inside lane on both northbound and southbound lanes. Efforts included preparation of the Pond Siting Report (PSR) and Location Hydraulics Report (LHR). SR 417/Aloma Interchange Efficiency Improvements, Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise, Seminole County, FL. Engineer of Record. Responsible for drainage support and analysis to address erosion issues caused by to high velocity runoff at the Aloma Avenue interchange. This included designing high discharge/velocity mitigation measures and erosion prevention methods. Provided drainage support to roadway design team to address environmental permitting and construction concerns. Project involves adding turn lanes and improving ramp operations for the Aloma Avenue interchange with SR 417. Work includes milling and resurfacing, lighting, drainage improvements, utility coordination, and notice general permit. Designed roadway improvements and completed the MOT plans. Widen SR 91 from North of Atlantic Avenue to Boynton Beach Boulevard, Milepost 82.4 to Milepost 87.3 – Part A - Design Analysis, Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise, Palm Beach County, FL. Project Manager. Managed all aspects of the project as a multidisciplinary sub-consultant providing Drainage Analysis and Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) design services. Key project issues include: Widening SR 91 from the existing six (6) lanes to eight (10) lanes from north of Atlantic Avenue (MP 82.4) to north of Boynton Beach Boulevard (MP 87.3), stabilizing the Lake Worth Drainage District (LW DD) E-2W canal bank to support the project’s widening needs, roadway lighting, signing and pavement markings, utility coordination and noise barriers east and west of the mainline. Kennedy also led the drainage design effort. Drainage Lead Engineer, SR-400/I-4 from W of SR 528 to W of SR 435 (Kirkman Road), FDOT District Five, Orange County, FL. Drainage Lead Engineer. Key project issues include: widening the existing six lane divided urban interstate to a ten-lane divided with the addition of two (2) new express lanes in each direction. Improvements are proposed at interchanges at Central Florida Parkway, SR 528 and Sand Lake Road, required storm water treatment with proposed pond sites along the corridor, reconstruction of arterial roads: parallel to I-4. Drainage responsibilities included: providing a detailed investigation and analyses of existing drainage pond facilities to verify their feasibility with regard to capacity, contamination, hydraulic grade line, maintenance access, and constructability, analysis and replacement of existing cross drains, and preparation of a Technical Memorandum to document findings, and securing environmental permits from SFWMD. 11.C.4 Packet Pg. 470 Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) Ken Wooten, PE Roadway Design Task Lead Ken has more than 19 years of roadway design and project management experience on multi-disciplined design projects and PD&E studies. He specializes in roadway design and planning for highway facilities such as interstate highways, interchanges, freeways, intersections, and urban and rural arterial roads. Ken has extensive experience on projects for FDOT throughout Florida. Relevant Project Experience Oil Well Road, Collier County Transportation Department, Collier County, FL. Roadway Design Engineer. Roadway engineer responsible for design of 11.1 miles of Oil Well Road from Immokalee Road to east of Camp Keais Road in eastern Collier County. The project scope included widening a two-lane rural section to a four lane and six lane urban section. Responsibilities included horizontal and vertical alignment, leading the preparation of the design plan and assisting the project manager with coordinating the design plans preparation with internal staff and subconsultants. SR 580/Busch Blvd, West Busch Boulevard (SR 580) Corridor Study, FL Department of Transportation District Seven, Tampa, FL. Roadway Lead. Complete streets study for West Busch Boulevard, a major east-west arterial serving Busch Gardens in Tampa, FL. First in FL to utilize the newly adopted FDOT Context Classifications, which considers the adjacent existing and future land use in roadway design. Wekiva Parkway Corridor Consultant, Central FL Expressway Authority (CFX) and FDOT District Five, Orange, Lake, and Seminole Counties, FL. Roadway/MOT Task Lead. Responsible for technical reviews of roadway and MOT plans on this contract for both the Central FL Expressway Authority (CFX) and FDOT for the design of a new 26-mile section. The CH2M team’s services on this contract include successfully managing six design teams in the delivery of five roadway and three toll facility projects with a constructed value of $550 million, as well as providing comprehensive reviews of all necessary design submittals for CFX. I-95 Design, FDOT District 5, Brevard County, FL. Project Engineer. Project engineer for the final design of a 13.5-mile segment of I-95 from south of SR 514 (Malabar Road) to north of SR 518 (Eau Gallie Boulevard). The project includes providing safety improvements such as median guardrail to address median crossover accidents, as well as adding widening to the inside for an additional lane in each direction for capacity and safety. Included in the final design services is the design and reconstruction of two interchanges (US 192 and SR 518), and design elements for drainage and stormwater design and permitting, right-of-way acquisition for retention ponds, noise walls, bridge widening and reconstruction, and maintenance of traffic. Responsible for horizontal and vertical alignment, led the preparation of the design plans and assisted the project manager. Seminole Expressway/SR 417 PD&E Study, FL’s Turnpike Enterprise, Seminole County, FL. Project Engineer. Served as project engineer for this eight-lane PD&E study. Responsibilities included development of widening concepts and development of alternatives for improvements to the Aloma Avenue interchange. Project issues included Lake Jesup water quality, public involvement with the Friends of Lake Jesup, previous permit coordination, and interchange improvements at Aloma Avenue. A design option for this project was exercised by the client based on successful performance. Beachline East (SR 528) Expressway PD&E Study, FL’s Turnpike Enterprise, Orange and Brevard Counties, FL. Roadway Design Engineer. PD&E Study to evaluate the proposed Beachline widening to eight lanes from SR 520 to SR 524 (Industry Road). Homestead Toll Plaza Express Lanes Design, FL’s Turnpike Enterprise, Miami-Dade County, FL. Project Manager. Project manager and engineer of record for the reconstruction the existing toll plaza, construction of a new administration building and parking lot, and roadway improvements to the toll facility. Two additional mainline travel lanes (one in each direction) are required within the vicinity of the toll plaza to accommodate adequate traffic operations and are proposed to be added to the inside of the existing travel lanes. The scope of services for the 2.1-mile project includes drainage design, utility coordination, permitting, structures design, toll facility design, signing and pavement markings, lighting, landscape architecture, surveying and mapping, geotechnical, and architecture. Cass Street and Tyler Street Two-Way Conversion, City of Tampa, Hillsborough County, FL. Project Manager. Conversion of the existing one-way pair streets of East Cass Street and East Tyler Street into two-way Education MBA, Business Administration, University of Florida BS, Environmental Engineering, University of Florida Registrations/Certifications Professional Engineer: FL (#58817) Years of Experience 19 11.C.4 Packet Pg. 471 Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) Ken Wooten, PE Page 2 streets. The improvements consist of milling and resurfacing within the project limits, adding a barrier separated two-way cycle track on the south side of the roadway, pavement markings, signing, and replacing the traffic signals. There is a total of thirteen (13) signalized intersections which need to be modified to accommodate the proposed roadway modifications, which will require replacing and adding new mast arms to be in compliance with new design standards. US 441 Design/Build, FDOT District One, Okeechobee County, FL. Senior Project Engineer. Responsible for plans production assistance and drafting backchecks for this $12.7 million project involving the design/build reconstruction of a two-lane roadway to a four-lane urban roadway from the CSX Railroad Crossing No. 628062 to Cemetery Road. I-4 Auxiliary Lanes (SR 528 to SR 482) Design/Build, FDOT District Five, Brevard County, FL. Project Engineer. Assisted in the ditch and pond design for the addition of an eastbound and westbound auxiliary lane on a 1.3-mile section of I-4. The project is located in a high traffic volume area near Orlando’s major tourist attractions. Winchester Boulevard Design, Sarasota County, FL. Project Engineer. Responsible for designing six stormwater management systems for a new 3-mile roadway alignment. Responsibilities included ditch design, storm sewer design, pond design, cross drain design, floodplain encroachment, and compensation analysis and permitting. Winchester Boulevard PD&E Study, Sarasota County, FL. Drainage Engineer. Responsible for floodplain compensation analysis, cross drain analysis, and preparation of location hydraulics report for this PD&E study. Purpose of study was to determine a preferred alignment and design features for a new 3-mile roadway in southern Sarasota County. Key elements of the project included public involvement, traffic analysis, roadway and drainage design, permitting, and environmental issues. General Engineering Consultant (GEC) Services, FDOT District Seven, FL. Project Engineer. Provided services to support the District’s Plans, Specifications, and Estimates Group. Responsibilities included reviewing roadway plans, specification packages, and cost estimates. In addition, provided roadway design plan phase reviews on multiple projects, while supporting the District’s Roadway Design Group. US 41/SR 45/Broad Street Improvements, FDOT District Seven, Hernando County, FL. Project Manager. Milling and resurfacing of the asphalt pavement and correcting cross slope to meet current design criteria for 4.76 miles of roadway. Project also includes correcting superelevation rate and superelevation transitions, developing two separate pavement designs to account for varying cracking/rutting depths, replacing existing cracked concrete ditch pavement, designing signing and pavement marking upgrades to improve the safety at the intersection of US 41 and CR 481/Snow Memorial Highway, and processing design variations for deficient design features. Project Manager, Gunn Highway/Linebaugh Avenue Intersection Improvements Study, Miscellaneous Professional Engineering Services General/Civil, Hillsborough County, FL. Project Manager. Managed the PD&E Study to identify the optimum intersection improvement recommendation for the intersection at Gunn Highway and Linebaugh Avenue. As part of the study preliminary roadway alignments and typical sections are under development. In addition, the scope of services included a traffic study, drainage and permitting analysis, signalization, development of a preliminary maintenance of traffic concept, and cost estimates for the design and construction of the recommended improvements. Lithia Pinecrest Road and Lumsden Road Intersection Improvements Design, Miscellaneous Professional Engineering Services General/Civil Contract, Hillsborough County, FL. Project Manager. Design project to improve the safety and traffic operations. Project involved adding additional through lanes in three of the four legs of the intersection, additional turn lanes in all four legs of the intersection, sidewalks throughout the project limits, and bike lanes along Lithia Pinecrest Road. Lithia Pinecrest Road is being reconstructed within the project limits from a two-lane rural typical section to a four-lane urban typical section and Lumdsen Road is being milled, resurfaced, and widened to accommodate the improvements. The project scope of services also included drainage improvements, permitting, signalization, signing and pavement markings, utility coordination, surveying and mapping, and geotechnical. 11.C.4 Packet Pg. 472 Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) Scott Bear, PE Constructability Task Lead Scott has 31 years of experience delivering complex interstate/ interchange and large-corridor projects. His experience includes guiding design teams’ focus on design criteria, quality, TCP, and constructability. Scott has a broad range of experience on a wide variety of PD&E and design projects for FDOT and FTE. Relevant Project Experience Oil Well Road, Collier County Transportation Department, Collier County, FL. Project Manager. Managed the design and permitting for the widening and reconstruction of 11.1 miles of Oil Well Road from Immokalee Road to east of Camp Keais Road in eastern Collier County. The project scope included widening a two-lane rural section to a four lane and six lane urban section. The project included extensive public involvement due to impacts to environmentally sensitive areas as well as heavily developed sections of the corridor. The permitting effort included drainage and environmental impacts as well as wildlife crossings for endangered species such as the FL Panther. I-4 (Memorial Boulevard to US 98) Design-Build, FDOT District One, Polk County, FL. Design Team Project Manager. Managed the design for a $60 million project involving the widening of a 3.5-mile section of I-4 near Lakeland from four to six lanes. Managed the delivery of CH2M’s services which included design project management, roadway design, drainage design, permitting, maintenance of traffic, and structural design for the widening project which includes the replacement of six bridges crossing over I-4. Project criteria for the bridges required the horizontal and vertical clearance for the reconstructed bridges had to accommodate the ultimate I-4 section that included HOV lanes and a rail corridor in the median. Horizontal clearance provided as required for the ultimate typical section, including special use GULs, auxiliary lanes, and barriers. Previously permitted for median widening, efforts included streamlining the SWFWMD and USACE permit modifications with changes to the pond designs, habitat and floodplain compensation in the roadside ditches, and floodplain modeling to support no compensation pond for the newly mapped Kathleen Road floodplain. US 441 Design-Build, FDOT District One, Okeechobee County, FL. Constructability and QC Review. Led constructability and QC reviews for this $12.7 million project involving the design-build reconstruction of a two-lane roadway to a four-lane urban roadway from CSX Railroad Crossing No. 628062 to north of Cemetery Road. I-4/US 27 Interchange, FDOT District One, Polk County, FL. Project Engineer. Responsible for the design of US 27 as a subconsultant for this project. The project involved the six-laning of US 27, six-laning of I-4, and the reconstruction of the interchange. Major components of the design include bridges for US 27 over I-4, access management, and maintenance of traffic for both I-4 and US 27. Project Man Senior Technologist/Peer Review, Wekiva Parkway PD&E Study, Central FL Expressway Authority, Orange, Lake, and Seminole Counties, FL. Senior technologist and internal peer reviewer for all preliminary roadway design elements of the conceptual plans. Involvement included discussion and evaluation of applicable design criteria related to the typical section, horizontal and vertical alignments, access management for frontage roads, and interchange geometry for the 28.45-mile limited-access toll facility. The conceptual plans addressed horizontal and vertical alignments of the mainline and interchanges to establish the corridor right-of-way requirements and socio-economic and environmental impacts. Beachline East (SR 528) Expressway PD&E Study, FL’s Turnpike Enterprise, Orange and Brevard Counties, FL. QA/QC Reviewer. Project involved widening to eight lanes from SR 520 to SR 524 (Industry Road). The PD&E Study includes overlapping design (milling and resurfacing) for critical roadway segments, feasibility evaluation of a potential service plaza, multimodal accommodations for rail/transit facilities, and extensive environmental resources within the study area. Seminole Expressway/SR 417 PD&E Study (Orange/Seminole County Line to Rinehart Road) and Seminole Expressway/SR 417 Widening Design (Orange/Seminole County Line to North of SR 434), FL’s Turnpike Enterprise, Seminole County, FL. QA/QC Manager. Provided overall quality review services for the PD&E study to widen the Seminole Expressway/SR 417 to eight lanes. Study included extensive evaluation of existing design deficiencies, evaluation of options to widen to eight lanes for the ultimate condition while accommodating an interim six-lane improvement. The result of this evaluation was final development of typical/non-typical sections for the corridor and environmental clearance for reconstruction of one interchange, bridge widening, significant water Education B.S., Civil Engineering, Lehigh University B.S., Architecture, Lehigh University Registrations/Certifications Professional Engineer: FL #43867 Years of Experience 31 11.C.4 Packet Pg. 473 Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) Scott Bear, PE Page 2 quality issues at Lake Jesup, and noise abatement considerations. Subsequent to successful completion of the SEIR, served as QA/QC manager of the multidisciplinary, multiple-subconsultant project to widen existing four-lane SR 417 to an interim six lanes between the Orange/Seminole County line to just north of SR 434. Key project issues include reconstruction of the bridges over Aloma Avenue, complex design/MOT to minimize horizontal stopping sight distance deficiencies on the mainline (including cross overs), fast-track FDEP permitting, with considerations for new criteria guidelines and coordination with local agencies, to ensure mutual benefit for design implementation. I-95/Pineda Causeway Extension Interchange PD&E Study, FDOT District Five, Brevard County, FL. QA/QC Manager. Study which consisted of the preparation of a Categorical Exclusion for the proposed I-95 interchange with the Pineda Causeway Extension, a controlled access facility. Involved coordination with FDOT, local and regional agencies, consultants, and a comprehensive public involvement program. I-295 Express Lanes, FDOT District Two, Duval County, FL. QA/QC- Roadway. Final design for adding Express Lanes along I-295 from the SR 13 interchange to the Old St. Augustine Road Interchange and from the Old St. Augustine Road interchange to the I-95 south Interchange. The proposed design also incorporates milling and resurfacing of the existing lanes and ramps from the Buckman Bridge to the south interchange for a project length of 4.26 miles. I-75 (SR 93) at FL’s Turnpike – Wildwood Interchange (MP 309)-Design-Build Request for Proposal, Phase I (30%) Roadway Plans and 45% Drainage, FL’s Turnpike Enterprise, Sumter County, FL. QA/QC Manager. Provided overall quality review services for this project to improve the operational efficiency and safety of the existing interchange through a design-build delivery. Key project issues include: reconfigure the interchange to provide a dedicated right-hand exit to SB Turnpike from SR 44, separate NB I-75 exit traffic to SR 44 from NB Turnpike mainline traffic, widen I-75 from existing four-lane to six lanes, accommodation for two I-75 truck lanes (one in each direction), minimize impacts to existing springs (artesian conditions) within the existing interchange, ensure that all improvements accommodate future widening of the Turnpike mainline from four to six lanes, removal and replacement of existing ITS system, master signing concept on I-75 and Turnpike mainline, maintenance of traffic to implement construction including significant detour design (17 miles long), extension of existing box culverts to maintain existing flow patterns, and processing border width design variation and use of retaining walls to avoid right-of-way impacts. I-95 Design, FDOT District Five, Brevard County, FL. Project Manager. Managed the final design of a 13.5-mile segment of I-95 from south of SR 514 (Malabar Road) to north of SR 518 (Eau Gallie Boulevard). The project includes providing safety improvements such as median guardrail to address median crossover accidents, as well as adding widening to the inside for an additional lane in each direction for capacity and safety. Included in the final design services is the design and reconstruction of two interchanges (US 192 and SR 518), and design elements for drainage/stormwater design and permitting, right-of-wa y acquisition for retention ponds, noise walls, bridge widening and reconstruction, and maintenance of traffic. Wekiva Parkway Corridor Consultant, Central FL Expressway Authority (CFX) and FDOT District Five, Orange, Lake, and Seminole Counties, FL. Program Manager. Responsible for program management, project management oversight of client-selected design consultants, design reviews, environmental permitting and compliance, right-of-way coordination assistance and services during construction on this contract for both the Central FL Expressway Authority (CFX) and FDOT for the design of a new 25-mile section of the Wekiva Parkway. The CH2M team’s services on this contract include successfully managing six design teams in the delivery of five roadway and three toll facility projects with a constructed value of $550 million, as well as providing comprehensive reviews of all necessary design submittals for CFX. CH2M is also providing coordination with the public involvement consultant and the CFX public involvement officer. Further, CH2M staff is providing technical reviews and environmental compliance for the design of the FDOT’s nine design sections required as part of the Wekiva Parkway corridor. I-4 Beyond the Ultimate, Segment 2, FDOT District Five, Orange County, FL. Project Manager. Responsible for project management, design services, and development of design build-RFP for the reconstruction and widening of I-4 in Orange County to build-out I-4 to its ultimate condition. This 3.6-mile segment involves widening the existing six-lane divided urban interstate to a 10-lane divided section, which includes two new tolled express lanes in each direction, resulting in a total of 10 dedicated lanes. The project includes a systems interchange and a diverging diamond interchange and accommodates required stormwater treatment with proposed pond sites along the corridor. 11.C.4 Packet Pg. 474 Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) Tom Ross, PE Traffic Task Lead Tom has more than 28 years of experience in transportation planning, traffic operations, and design for roadway projects throughout Florida. He is experienced in providing quality review for roadway signing and pavement marking, signals, ITS, and lighting projects. Tom has expertise in designing clear and concise signage plans and creative solutions that improve circulation and minimize conflict. Relevant Project Experience Oil Well Road, Collier County Transportation Department, Collier County, FL. Traffic Engineer. Responsible for traffic signal design, ITS design, and signing and pavement marking design for the widening and reconstruction of 11.1 miles of Oil Well Road from Immokalee Road to east of Camp Keais Road in eastern Collier County. The project scope included widening a two-lane rural to a four-lane and six-lane urban section. The project included extensive public involvement due to impacts to environmentally sensitive areas as well as heavily developed sections of the corridor. Port Manatee Connector PD&E Study, FDOT District One, Manatee and Hillsborough Counties, FL. Corridor Modeling Coordination and Traffic Support. Responsibilities include interfacing traffic modeling and analyses into study-level decisions for this PD&E study to develop and evaluate viable corridor alternatives to improve goods movement and traffic flow between I-75 and Port Manatee. The initial level of documentation is an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). The corridor analysis is included the evaluation of numerous environmental constraints including wetlands, floodplains, cultural resources, threatened and endangered species, hazardous waste sites, and public lands as well as public outreach and agency coordination. Consensus building efforts with the Manatee County Port Authority, agency stakeholders, and project stakeholders including environmental special interest groups, major developers and approximately 2,000 property owners continue as the viable alternatives are documented. District Wide Systems Planning Consultant; FDOT District One; FL. Project Manager. Managed three cycles of this District Wide Systems project. Provided all management reviews. Tasks include updating transportation forecasting model validations for DeSoto County, Hardee County and Glades County, review of transportation impact studies for growth management in rural counties and other various assignments as an extension of the District’s staff. Upcoming tasks will include developing the future year transportation plan updates for the year 2035 for DeSoto, Hardee, Glades and Okeechobee Counties. General Transportation Planning Consultant, FDOT District 1, FL. Project Manager. Managed two cycles of this contract. The contract included a wide range of services including project traffic reports, FSUTMS modeling, a transportation systems management study for a Strategic Intermodal System (SIS) connector facility, development of a systems interchange modification report, and project report reviews. West Busch Boulevard (SR 580) Corridor Study, Florida Department of Transportation District Seven, Tampa, FL. Traffic Engineer/Advisor. Complete streets study for West Busch Boulevard, a major east-west arterial serving Busch Gardens in Tampa, Florida. First in Florida to utilize the newly adopted FDOT Context Classifications, which considers the adjacent existing and future land use in roadway design. Colonial Parkway PD&E Study, Florida Department of Transportation and Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise, Orlando, FL. Traffic Engineer. CH2M is working with the FDOT and FTE to develop and evaluate alternatives for improvements to East Colonial Drive (State Road 50), a major east-west arterial serving central Florida, heavily impacted by population growth and tourism. Wekiva Parkway/SR 46 Realignment PD&E Study, Central Florida Expressway Authority (CFX), Orange, Lake, and Seminole Counties, FL. Corridor Transportation Planner/Traffic Engineer. Project involves a corridor analysis of a 26-mile limited-access toll facility (four lanes, expandable to six lanes) on new alignment that will complete the Western Beltway around the metropolitan Orlando area. Responsibilities include corridor-wide concept design input based on traffic operations and coordinating production of an Interchange Modification Report (IMR) for modified I-4/Wekiva Parkway system-system interchange. I-4 PD&E Study, Section 2, FDOT District Five, Orange, Seminole, and Volusia Counties, FL. Transportation Planner/Engineer. Responsible for providing traffic operations analyses, development of an intelligent transportation system (ITS) plan, and development of a complex advance signing plan. 43-mile section of I-4. The project limits include downtown Orlando, a crossing of the St. Johns River, and a major system interchange Education B.S., Civil Engineering, University of Central Florida Registrations/Certifications Professional Engineer: FL #48205, GA Years of Experience 28 11.C.4 Packet Pg. 475 Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) Tom Ross, PE Page 2 with SR 408 (East-West Expressway). Project costs for the improvements are more than $1.5 billion. The project also included an extensive public involvement program involving three counties and more than 10 local municipalities and a full array of potential impacts, including historic areas, wetlands, parks, endangered species, and environmental justice issues. I-295 Express Lanes, FDOT District Two, Duval County, FL. Traffic Design Task Manager. Traffic Design Task Manager for the final design for adding Express Lanes along I-295 from the Buckman Bridge to the I-95 south Interchange for a project length of 5 miles. Both eight-lane and 10-lane sections were developed and the project was advertised as design-build. Responsible for development of a Master Concept Signing Plan, ITS concept of operations, system engineering management plan, and ITS integration plans for ITS improvements, which extend 10 miles. Also responsible for oversight of the preparation of construction plans and specifications for traffic control system, dynamic message sign system, CCTV system, vehicle detection system, and fiber optic communications system for communication with the traffic management center. Included the utilization of traffic engineering software, freeway control software, and a computerized timing program. Beachline East (SR 528) Expressway PD&E Study, Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise, Orange and Brevard Counties, FL. Traffic Engineer. PD&E Study to evaluate the proposed Beachline widening to eight lanes from SR 520 to SR 524 (Industry Road). The PD&E Study includes overlapping design (milling and resurfacing) for critical roadway segments, feasibility evaluation of a potential service plaza, multimodal accommodations for rail/transit facilities, and extensive environmental resources within the study area. Homestead Extension of Florida’s Turnpike (HEFT) Ramp Intersection at NW 12th Street Modifications, Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise, Miami-Dade County, FL. Traffic/Signing and Pavement Marking/Signalization/ITS/Lighting QA/QC. Provided QA/QC for the traffic analysis, signing and pavement marking, signalization, ITS, and lighting elements for this project that included the design of an additional right-turn lane on the southbound off-ramp at the HEFT/12th Street Interchange, upgrade of the existing signalized intersection at NW 12th Street including ADA compliance for pedestrian features, and lighting analysis to accommodate proposed changes. Seminole Expressway/SR 417 Widening (Orange/Seminole County Line to North of SR 434), Florida's Turnpike Enterprise, Seminole County, FL. Signing and Pavement Marking QA/QC. Responsible for quality review of signing and pavement marking plans for this multidisciplinary, multiple-subconsultant project to widen existing four-lane SR 417 to six lanes. Key project issues include reconstruction of the bridges over Aloma Avenue, complex design/MOT to minimize horizontal stopping sight distance deficiencies on the mainline (including cross overs), fast-track FDEP permitting, with considerations for new criteria guidelines and coordination with local agencies, to ensure mutual benefit for design implementation. Project was performed under fast-track schedule to acquire necessary permits before proposed rule change. I-75 (SR 93) at Florida’s Turnpike – Wildwood Interchange (MP 309)-Design-Build Request for Proposal, Phase I (30%) Roadway Plans and 45% Drainage, Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise, Sumter County, FL. Traffic/Signing and Pavement Marking/ITS/Lighting QA/QC. Provided QA/QC for the traffic analysis, signing and pavement marking, ITS, and lighting elements of this project to improve the operational efficiency and safety of the existing interchange through a design-build delivery. Key project issues include: reconfigure the interchange to provide a dedicated right-hand exit to SB Turnpike from SR 44, separate NB I-75 exit traffic to SR 44 from NB Turnpike mainline traffic, widen I-75 from existing four-lane to six lanes, removal and replacement of existing ITS system, master signing concept on I-75 and Turnpike mainline, maintenance of traffic to implement construction including significant detour design. SR 417/Aloma Interchange Efficiency Improvements, Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise, Seminole County, FL. Traffic/Signing and Pavement Marking/Signalization/ITS/Lighting QA/QC. Provided QA/QC for the traffic analysis, signing and pavement marking, signalization, ITS, and lighting elements for this project which is adding turn lanes and improving ramp operations for the Aloma Avenue interchange with SR 417. Work includes milling and resurfacing, lighting, drainage improvements, utility coordination, and notice general permit. USB 41/SR 60 (West of 14th Street to East of 22nd Street), FDOT District Seven, Hillsborough County, FL. Signing & Pavement Marking/Signalization QA/QC. Providing quality oversight review of signing and pavement marking, and signalization tasks for this urban roadway improvement project which is located in a corridor designated as a SIS connector. The project focuses on resurfacing/restoration of existing pavement, including milling and resurfacing asphalt over concrete base, and cleaning and sealing cracks in concrete pavement. Upgrades include cross slope correction, advance signal signs, loop replacement, implementation of sidewalk/shared-use path, multiple design variations, ADA-compliant pedestrian crossings, inlet top replacement, and SWFWMD permit exemption. 11.C.4 Packet Pg. 476 Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6 Lane Widening Project,) 11.C.4 Packet Pg. 477 Attachment: 19-7494_VanderbiltBeachRd_Widening_submittal (11479 : 19-7494 Vanderbilt Beach Road 6