Loading...
Agenda 10/22/2019 Item #11D (Golden Gate Golf Course Operations)10/22/2019 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Recommendation to review the unsolicited offer from the Gulf Coast Junior Golf Tour, Inc., dba The First Tee of Naples/Collier (First Tee) to temporarily operate the Golden Gate Golf Course (Golf Course) while the County determines the future use of the property and should the Board wish to proceed, waive the Base Application Fee of $10,000, and approve all necessary budget amendments. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate an unsolicited offer from First Tee to operate the Golden Gate Golf Course while the County performs the tasks necessary to complete the planning process for the future use of the property. CONSIDERATIONS: At the October 8, 2019 the Board directed staff to solicit for a firm to provide interim golf operations at the Golden Gate Golf Course while the County works with a planning and engineering firm to layout the future use of the property. Recognizing that a formal solicitation would take approximately three to six months, First Tee submitted the attached unsolicited offer to tem porarily operate the Golf Course. Should the Board choose to consider this unsolicited offer, the Procurement Services Division would advertise the proposal for additional offers, in accordance with Florida Statutes § 287.05712. Additionally, Florida Statute § 287.05712(4)(a) provides that the County "may establish a reasonable application fee for the submission of an unsolicited proposal". County Resolution 2016-85 sets this application fee at $10,000. Since this proposal is being submitted by a non-profit organization staff recommends either waiving this fee or reducing the fee to a nominal value. Should the Board decide to decline this offer, staff would recommend not preparing an additional solicitation as it would be highly unlikely that another entity would participate in the solicitation knowing that the interim operator solicitation was advertised in conjunction with a Public Private Partnership (3P) solicitation. According to their proposal, First Tee envisions that the course would be open for play on or before December 1, 2019. Indicated in the proposal are several immediate needs identified by First Tee required to re-open the course for play. They include the following: 1. Maintenance equipment through short term leases ($5K/Monthly) 2. 30 additional golf carts to account for the projected seasonal play ($3K/Monthly-Seasonal) 3. Over-seeding of approximately 50 acres ($50K/One-time) 4. Irrigation improvements ($20K/One-time) 5. Monthly management fee ($25K/Monthly) In addition, First Tee seeks an upfront County investment of $100,000 for specific improvements to the Golf Course prior to re-opening. This investment would include some of the items previously mentioned above. First Tee proposes to refund the County one-half of this investment by the end of the second year of operations. The total County first year expense associated with proposal is approximately $450,000. The second-year expense including credit for the proposed refund is approximately $330,000. Staff recommends limiting the agreement to one-year with a 30 day termination clause. Currently the Board has an existing agreement with First Tee to provide maintenance services at the Golf Course. This agreement is scheduled to terminate on November 29, 2019. If the contract is not extended, staff would take on the maintenance of the property through staff resources or existing contracts until a 3P 11.D Packet Pg. 741 10/22/2019 is secured or the redevelopment process is complete. FISCAL IMPACT: The FY 2020 General Fund budget contains within a specific cost center $441,300 of existing appropriation for maintenance of the Golden Gate Golf Course property. This existing appropriation will cover the $100,000 stated to prepare the existing grounds for play and cover the $300,000 to maintain the grounds and manage the operations for play after the initial course play improvements are made. It is suggested that a budget amendment from existing General Fund appropriation in the amount of $100,000 be processed providing additional budget in the event of unforeseen maintenance and or operational issues. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There is no Growth Management impact. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This item has been reviewed by the County Attorney. First Tee’s unsolicited offer falls within the following provision of the Collier County Procurement ordinance: Sec. 2-198. - Unsolicited Proposals. 1. The Board incorporates by reference F.S. § 255.065, as may be amended from time to time, which addresses the procurement of services for qualifying projects through public-private partnerships, including through an offer of an unsolicited proposal. 2. a. The Board shall by separate Resolution establish all Application Fees referenced under F.S. § 255.065 that a private entity must pay concurrent with the submission of an unsolicited proposal. Payment shall be made by cash, cashier's check, or some other non-cancellable instrument. Personal checks shall not be accepted. b. To the extent that the cost to evaluate an unsolicited proposal costs more than the Initial Application Fee ad opted by Resolution, the County may request payment of any additional amounts required to conduct its review as provided in F.S. § 255.065. (Ord. No. 2017-08, § 13) Florida Statutes Sec. 255.065 (Public-private partnerships; public records and public meetings exemptions) sets forth a lengthy and detailed mandatory process with respect to the review and acceptance of unsolicited offers. Very briefly stated, staff would need to advertise that there is an unsolicited offer for a minimum of 21 days; come back to the Board with a report on whether there were any other offers; assuming that there were no competing offers, get Board direction to negotiate an agreement with First Tee; negotiate an agreement; then hold a public hearing for the Board to review the proposed agreement and make a number of required findings. A copy of this statute is included as back- up to the item. With that noted, this item is approved as to form and legality, and requires majority vote for approval. - JAK RECOMMENDATION: To review the unsolicited offer from the Gulf Coast Junior Golf Tour, Inc., dba The First Tee of Naples/Collier (First Tee) to temporarily operate the Golden Gate Golf Course (Golf Course) while the County determines the future use of the property and provide direction to the County Manager or his designee. Should the Board wish to entertain this offer and potentially others through the unsolicited offer process, staff recommends waiving the Base Application Fee of $10,000 and recommends the approval of all necessary budget amendments. Prepared By: Geoff Willig, Senior Operations Analyst, County Manager’s Office ATTACHMENT(S) 1. The First Tee's Golden Gate Golf Course Proposal (PDF) 11.D Packet Pg. 742 10/22/2019 2. The First Tee's GGGC Financial Projections 2020 (PDF) 3. GGGC Preliminary Projection 2020 Golf Rates (PDF) 4. F.S. Sec. 255.065 (DOCX) 11.D Packet Pg. 743 10/22/2019 COLLIER COUNTY Board of County Commissioners Item Number: 11.D Doc ID: 10519 Item Summary: Recommendation to review the unsolicited offer from the Gulf Coast Junior Golf Tour, Inc., dba The First Tee of Naples/Collier (The First Tee) to temporarily operate the Golden Gate Golf Course (Golf Course) while the County determines the future use of the property and waive the Base Application Fee of $10,000, and approve all necessary budget amendments. (Geoffrey Will ig, County Manager's Office) Meeting Date: 10/22/2019 Prepared by: Title: Operations Analyst – County Manager's Office Name: Geoffrey Willig 10/14/2019 4:43 PM Submitted by: Title: County Manager – County Manager's Office Name: Leo E. Ochs 10/14/2019 4:43 PM Approved By: Review: Procurement Services Opal Vann Level 1 Purchasing Gatekeeper Completed 10/14/2019 4:49 PM Procurement Services Ted Coyman Additional Reviewer Completed 10/15/2019 4:23 PM County Attorney's Office Jeffrey A. Klatzkow Level 2 Attorney Review Completed 10/16/2019 11:50 AM County Attorney's Office Jeffrey A. Klatzkow Level 3 County Attorney's Office Review Completed 10/16/2019 11:50 AM Office of Management and Budget Laura Wells Level 3 OMB Gatekeeper Review Completed 10/16/2019 11:51 AM Budget and Management Office Mark Isackson Additional Reviewer Completed 10/16/2019 12:06 PM County Manager's Office Leo E. Ochs Level 4 County Manager Review Completed 10/16/2019 1:50 PM Board of County Commissioners MaryJo Brock Meeting Pending 10/22/2019 9:00 AM 11.D Packet Pg. 744 GOLDEN GATE COUNTRY CLUB Page 1 | 11 GOLDEN GATE COUNTRY CLUB MANAGEMENT SERVICES PROPOSAL www.thefirstteenaplescollier.org …keeping kids out of the rough 11.D.1 Packet Pg. 745 Attachment: The First Tee's Golden Gate Golf Course Proposal (10519 : First Tee Unsolicited Offer) GOLDEN GATE COUNTRY CLUB Page 2 | 11 TABLE OF CONTENT INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 3 VISION STATEMENT ........................................................................................................................ 4 COMPANY SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................... 5 SITUATION ANALYSIS ...................................................................................................................... 6 SCOPE OF SERVICES ........................................................................................................................ 9 PROPOSED TERMS OF AGREEMENT ............................................................................................. 10 PROFESSIONAL FEES ..................................................................................................................... 11 11.D.1 Packet Pg. 746 Attachment: The First Tee's Golden Gate Golf Course Proposal (10519 : First Tee Unsolicited Offer) GOLDEN GATE COUNTRY CLUB Page 3 | 11 INTRODUCTION The First Tee of Naples/Collier is pleased to provide this proposal to assist Collier County in re- opening its golf course during the Golden Gate Golf Course property redevelopment process. It is our sincere desire to develop a long-term relationship with Collier County and deliver exceptional recreation, education and community service programs for the Collier County Community. The First Tee knows that with constant communication with key stakeholders, our highly qualified professionals, proven record of success, and strong work ethic we can re-open the golf facilities and assume the operational risk of the golf course during the property redevelopment process. The First Tee intends to help Collier County continue to position itself as the “place to live, play and work”, to attract new residents, and visitors, and to provide a much-needed affordable golf experience for existing residents, and visiting golfers. The First Tee understands a key objective for Collier County is to remain a premier destination for tourism and business and The First Tee knows that the Golden Gate golf course can connect with residents and visitors and generate a positive economic impact for Collier County. Through its operating partner and the sharing of new ideas, current thinking, and comparing results on the latest management strategies, The First Tee provides access to a wealth of information and expertise. To align interests and provide the greatest opportunity for success we propose that The First Tee of Naples/Collier enter into an agreement with Collier County to assume all golf course operations management responsibilities for the Golden Gate Country Club and to re-open the golf course to the public on or before December 1, 2019. 11.D.1 Packet Pg. 747 Attachment: The First Tee's Golden Gate Golf Course Proposal (10519 : First Tee Unsolicited Offer) GOLDEN GATE COUNTRY CLUB Page 4 | 11 VISION STATEMENT The First Tee of Naples/Collier will bring unique value and capabilities to Collier County, accelerating the redevelopment and growth of the Golden Gate Parkway golf course property and surrounding area while providing leading recreation, education, vocational rehabilitation and employment programs for the Collier County Community. The First Tee will develop a golf course master plan and provide capital for the development of a public/municipal golf facility that will deliver affordable golf for Collier County residents and visitors and become the permanent home for The First Tee of Naples/Collier and their youth and families. The First Tee Golf Club through its industry leading professional managers, supporters and donors will provide much more than affordable golf for Collier County residents, families, youth and veterans. TFTNC will create and deliver mentoring programs, life skills educational programs, vocational rehabilitation and employment programs for veterans and first responders in golf, culinary, maintenance, golf course maintenance and administration, caddie program and internships. The First Tee Golf Club will also offer opportunity to partner with other local and national organizations to create unique programs that utilize the game of golf to benefit the Community and the people that they serve. Veterans Affairs and South Florida PGA (PGA HOPE Program), Immokalee Middle/High School, Golden Gate Middle/High School, East Naples, The Boys & Girls Club, YMCA, Guadalupe Center, Sports Club and more… 11.D.1 Packet Pg. 748 Attachment: The First Tee's Golden Gate Golf Course Proposal (10519 : First Tee Unsolicited Offer) GOLDEN GATE COUNTRY CLUB Page 5 | 11 COMPANY SUMMARY Business Entity: Gulf Coast Junior Golf Tour, Inc. dba The First Tee of Naples/Collier Established in 1994 and amended and restated in 2007 FEIN #65-0477835 501(c)(3) Florida Not-For-Profit Corporation The First Tee is more than a sports program for youth. We believe all young people should have access to safe places and caring adults who help them grow socially, emotionally and academically. While teaching the fundamentals of a golf swing, our character education programs provide a fun, active environment for young people on the course, in schools and at youth centers. As children progress through The First Tee Life Skills Experience, the activities and life lessons become more involved, helping each child become even more equipped to make good choices on and off the golf course. General Information: The First Tee (International) The First Tee of Naples/Collier Support from all major golf organizations (i.e. PGA TOUR, USGA, World Golf Hall of Fame, etc.) Our Mission is to positively impact the lives of young people by providing educational programs that build character, instill life-enhancing values and promote healthy choices through the game of golf. Our Goal is to have each young person leave our program with the self-management, goal setting and conflict resolution skills necessary to compete and contribute in their respective communities. Our youth lead both on and off the golf course. Community Service: Currently Serving 1,000 + youth ages 7 to 18 Have served 10,000 youth and families since inception Funding: Private Donations and Trustee Program Corporate Partners Annual Golf Tournament at Calusa Pines Golf Club 11.D.1 Packet Pg. 749 Attachment: The First Tee's Golden Gate Golf Course Proposal (10519 : First Tee Unsolicited Offer) GOLDEN GATE COUNTRY CLUB Page 6 | 11 SITUATION ANALYSIS Collier County currently contracts The First Tee of Naples/Collier for the temporary maintenance of the Golden Gate golf course. The County is in the process of assessment, site planning and redevelopment planning for the Golden Gate golf course property. The County has left open the possibility of re-opening the golf course on a temporary basis during the site planning and redevelopment process. The First Tee of Naples/Collier has expressed interest in entering into a strategic partnership with Collier County to re-open and operate the Golden Gate golf course during the planning and redevelopment period. The First Tee knows that it can execute a cost-effective course recovery plan and re-open the golf course and operate it as a viable business through the property redevelopment period. Golden Gate Golf Club is an existing golf course premises consisting of an eighteen (18) hole public golf course and driving range. While there are many different golf courses in Naples/Collier County there are no municipal golf courses, few public offerings, and fewer with the caliber of course layout, history and location that Golden Gate has. High demand was witnessed while the course and restaurant were open to public under previous management. Golden Gate Golf Club re-opened and under the operation of TFTNC will meet the unmet public golf demand in Collier County with an offering of a welcoming course and practice facility for golfers of all demographics and skill levels, educational and vocational training and rehabilitation offering, and plenty of entertainment for all. Immediate Need for Re-Opening Golf course maintenance equipment. Sprayer, mowers, small tools. Option for TFTNC to acquire needed equipment through short term lease with Collier County reimbursement. Approximately $5,000 per month. Golf carts. Need for additional 30 golf carts. Option for TFTNC to acquire through seasonal lease. Approximately $3,000 per month. Turf recovery. Over-seed for upcoming peak period winter season, approximately 50 acres of turf. Tees, fairways and greens. Approximately $50,000 Irrigation repairs. Pump replacements are pending. Ongoing underground piping repairs, irrigation head replacement and controls repairs/replacements. Approximately $20,000 Keys to Success The First Tee of Naples/Collier has identified three factors that will be critical for their success. The first is the need to recover the existing course for acceptable playing conditions for the upcoming peak period. It is important to create a new look environment and playability that is in line with our targeted customer. The second key is our professional management group. This is particularly important for the establishment of high-level service standards, talent acquisition, training, standard operating procedures, and strict financial controls. These standards, practices, 11.D.1 Packet Pg. 750 Attachment: The First Tee's Golden Gate Golf Course Proposal (10519 : First Tee Unsolicited Offer) GOLDEN GATE COUNTRY CLUB Page 7 | 11 policies, and controls will help minimize risk. The last key to success will be the constant analysis for improvement of the business. It will be management’s task to continually analyze the business looking for ways that it can be adjusted to increase profitability. Golden Gate golf course will be well managed and TFTNC will continue to invest in people and projects that give the Club a distinct competitive advantage. There will be a commitment to invest in employees to offer the highest level of guest services for constituents. Target Market Customers Collier County Golf Club has identified three population target segments. The first segment of the population that will be targeted is the family and junior golfers, casual, senior, women, essential services personnel and military veteran golfers. These groups enjoy an affordable, less time consuming, less difficult, family-oriented golf experience. They appreciate the opportunity to play a fun game, learn the game, and socialize with friends. The second segment of the population that will be targeted is Charity Organizations. These groups enjoy the opportunity to create new programs and increase fund-raising through golf for those they serve. The third segment of the population that will be targeted supporting Collier County as a “Tourism Destination” is seasonal and visiting golfers/tourists. These groups enjoy a high-quality experience at an affordable price while they socialize in a casual, friendly environment. Target Market Segment Strategy TFTNC Golf Club will successfully target three distinct segments of the market. While these groups will be attracted to the facilities, the reasons that they visit are different. Understanding this will help TFTNC Golf Club accurately target the specific group. The first group is family and junior golfers, casual, senior, women, essential services personnel and military veteran golfers. These groups will be reached through advertisements and networking with different associations. These players are looking for places to learn the game, new places to play, and there are not enough public access courses that accommodate their desire for affordable, casual, less time-consuming golf. There is research and data to support that improved golfer's skills are directly related to playing more rounds of golf and spending more dollars in the Club. The second segment will be easy to target. This group comes from a growing section of the population, people who are visiting Naples in peak season either as seasonal residents or visiting golfers who enjoy a quality, affordable golf experience but do not have access to the majority of courses in area because they are private. The third segment will be easy to target due to proximity to the facilities. TFTNC Golf Club will draw from the large local population of businesspeople, faculty, and students. Students are a good segment of the population who like to eat, drink, play games, has disposable income, and has time for leisure activities. TFTNC Golf Club will embrace family centric and multi-generational marketing using new social and media tools available. 11.D.1 Packet Pg. 751 Attachment: The First Tee's Golden Gate Golf Course Proposal (10519 : First Tee Unsolicited Offer) GOLDEN GATE COUNTRY CLUB Page 8 | 11 The question is how we make the game of golf more attractive. Many courses are just too difficult and that creates frustration. The average golfer doesn't break 100. The Golden Gate property offers a course that is welcoming to golfers of all demographics and skill level and particularly to seniors, women, families, and juniors. More golfers are likely to use the course if they know their families can be entertained as well. Golfers today are much more family oriented and less willing to spend hours away from their spouses and children. Since time ranks among the top three reasons for not playing more golf a flexible routing golf course represents a great alternative for those looking to play a quick enjoyable round. Opportunities exist for alternative tees to entertain all skill levels. Family Tees are tees established 80-130 yards from the greens for nine- hole. This allows the entire family to play from the same set of tees. A great way for beginner golfers in the family to get out, learn the game, and play together on the golf courses. All members are required to play from the family tees, allowing everyone to experience the fun of playing as a group. With a paying adult, children under 17 play free of charge. There are many more programs that The First Tee can and will implement to provide more opportunities for Collier County residents and visitors. Advantage The First Tee of Naples/Collier protects and improves the County’s asset Provide much needed affordable public golf in Collier County Improved playing conditions that will attract more golfers and increase tourism Expertise and experience from industry leading professionals Proven record of success Transparency and Accountability Guidance and Support We get results and deliver results Our model is proven, and we get the most for the money Our years of experience have led us to understand that each club requires a unique approach to the operations of their golf course. We intend to demonstrate how we will help Collier County deliver affordable golf to the community, meet budgetary goals and attain a higher quality and sustainable golf course program through the property redevelopment period. 11.D.1 Packet Pg. 752 Attachment: The First Tee's Golden Gate Golf Course Proposal (10519 : First Tee Unsolicited Offer) GOLDEN GATE COUNTRY CLUB Page 9 | 11 SCOPE OF SERVICES TFTNC will provide total golf course management services. Management Services will include, but not be limited to, the following components: TFTNC will work as a contractor of Collier County and supervise the daily operations of the golf course at Golden Gate Country Club. TFTNC, through its golf course operations partner, will employ all the golf course and golf operations employees of the Facility. All employees will receive training and supervision. Our goal will be to build and retain the best team possible to ensure quality golf course playing conditions, service and ongoing customer satisfaction. TFTNC will provide Human Resources Management to include payroll administration, employee, and benefits administration. TFTNC will provide its resources and expertise to develop a comprehensive operational and agronomic recovery plan that will meet Collier County’s objectives. The plan will be designed to improve the current conditions as well as address areas that could be improved to ensure success through the property redevelopment period. TFTNC will coordinate local marketing activities, including the development of an overall Facility marketing plan, development and design of a Facility specific advertisement campaign and development and design of collateral marketing materials. TFTNC will prepare a monthly summary on performance to the Operational Plan and be available to review with Collier County. TFTNC through its golf course operations partner shall arrange for the procurement, as an Operating Cost, of all operating supplies, operating equipment, inventories, and services and utilize its centralized purchasing programs to obtain national pricing from all vendors providing goods and services to the golf course operations. TFTNC will enter into and execute service and maintenance agreements, purchase orders for the purchase of supplies, inventory, and equipment, as well as such other contracts and agreements as shall deem necessary for the proper use and operation of the golf course Facility. TFTNC will provide all accounting functions for the golf course maintenance operations including accounts payable. TFTNC will timely apply for, and diligently attempt to obtain and/or renew all licenses, permits and certificates required in connection with the golf course operations. Where required by governmental authorities, or where Collier County prefers, licenses shall be obtained in the name of Club and all documents shall, if necessary, be executed by Collier County in a timely fashion. 11.D.1 Packet Pg. 753 Attachment: The First Tee's Golden Gate Golf Course Proposal (10519 : First Tee Unsolicited Offer) GOLDEN GATE COUNTRY CLUB Page 10 | 11 PROPOSED TERMS OF AGREEMENT TFTNC will enter into a fixed fee management agreement with Collier County as the manager and operator of the Golden Gate golf course through the temporary and transitional property redevelopment period. TFTNC will assume the operational risk of the golf course. Collier County will provide funding for specific improvements to the golf course prior to the golf course re-opening. Prior to the effective date of the Agreement, Collier County will provide $100,000 in funding earmarked for golf course recovery and re-opening costs. TFTNC shall refund one-half, or $50,000, of this amount to Collier County on or before the end of the second year of the agreement “Initial Term”. Collier County will provide temporary golf shop and golf cart storage facilities. TFTNC will participate in the property redevelopment proposal process with the intent to work on transitioning the temporary golf course management agreement into a lease agreement or other long-term agreement to redevelop and operate the golf facility. 11.D.1 Packet Pg. 754 Attachment: The First Tee's Golden Gate Golf Course Proposal (10519 : First Tee Unsolicited Offer) GOLDEN GATE COUNTRY CLUB Page 11 | 11 PROFESSIONAL FEES For its services The First Tee of Naples/Collier is proposing the following: Term: Initial term will commence on date to be determined and will end on December 31, 2021. Renewal: Upon mutual written consent the agreement may be extended month to month through the property redevelopment period. TFTNC is committed to establishing a long-term relationship with Collier County. Management Fee: From and after the Commencement Date, a monthly management services fee of Twenty-Five Thousand Dollars ($25,000) 11.D.1 Packet Pg. 755 Attachment: The First Tee's Golden Gate Golf Course Proposal (10519 : First Tee Unsolicited Offer) GGCC 2020 Projections 2020 Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total Operating revenues Golf Operations 112,757 140,730 155,196 58,943 19,875 13,009 13,126 13,126 12,658 23,648 45,640 69,745 678,453 Admin - 112,757 140,730 155,196 58,943 19,875 13,009 13,126 13,126 12,658 23,648 45,640 69,745 678,453 Operating expenses Golf Operations 27,818 23,077 23,470 18,883 18,742 11,958 11,362 11,362 11,349 18,607 32,661 21,663 230,951 Golf Maintenance 38,677 35,474 36,181 38,405 42,925 32,376 32,959 31,127 34,196 40,451 58,890 36,042 457,702 Admin 17,555 18,058 18,369 16,636 15,933 15,809 15,811 15,811 15,803 16,001 16,397 16,930 199,112 84,050 76,609 78,019 73,924 77,600 60,143 60,132 58,300 61,347 75,059 107,948 74,635 887,765 Gross Operating Margin Golf Operations & Maintenance 46,261 82,179 95,546 1,654 (41,792) (31,325) (31,194) (29,362) (32,887) (35,410) (45,911) 12,041 (10,200) Admin (17,555) (18,058) (18,369) (16,636) (15,933) (15,809) (15,811) (15,811) (15,803) (16,001) (16,397) (16,930) (199,112) Amenities Operating Margin 28,707 64,121 77,177 (14,982) (57,725) (47,134) (47,006) (45,173) (48,689) (51,411) (62,308) (4,890) (209,312) Marketing 3,000 1,000 1,000 5,000 Real Estate & Intangible Tax - Depreciation Expenses Amenities Gross Margin 25,707 63,121 76,177 (14,982) (57,725) (47,134) (47,006) (45,173) (48,689) (51,411) (62,308) (4,890) (214,312) Management Fee Income 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 300,000 Gross Margin 50,707 88,121 101,177 10,018 (32,725) (22,134) (22,006) (20,173) (23,689) (26,411) (37,308) 20,110 85,688 11.D.2 Packet Pg. 756 Attachment: The First Tee's GGGC Financial Projections 2020 (10519 : First Tee Unsolicited Offer) Rates & Time Subject to Change Preliminary 2020 Rates Greens Fee Rates JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC PM = (After 2PM) Non-Resident 70.00 70.00 70.00 60.00 45.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 45.00 60.00 60.00 Non-Resident PM 40.00 40.00 40.00 35.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 35.00 35.00 Non-Resident Walking 45.00 45.00 45.00 40.00 29.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 29.00 40.00 40.00 Non-Resident Walking PM 25.00 25.00 25.00 20.00 18.00 18.00 18.00 18.00 18.00 18.00 20.00 20.00 Non-Resident 9 Hole 40.00 40.00 40.00 35.00 25.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 25.00 35.00 35.00 Non-Resident 9 Hole PM 25.00 25.00 25.00 20.00 18.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 18.00 20.00 20.00 Resident 49.00 49.00 49.00 42.00 32.00 22.00 22.00 22.00 22.00 32.00 42.00 42.00 Resident PM 30.00 30.00 30.00 25.00 20.00 18.00 18.00 18.00 18.00 20.00 25.00 25.00 Resident Walking 32.00 32.00 32.00 27.00 22.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 22.00 27.00 27.00 Resident Walking PM 20.00 20.00 20.00 18.00 15.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 15.00 18.00 18.00 Resident 9 Hole 30.00 30.00 30.00 25.00 20.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 20.00 25.00 25.00 Resident 9 Hole PM 20.00 20.00 20.00 18.00 15.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 15.00 18.00 18.00 Third Party & Promo 56.00 56.00 56.00 49.00 39.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 39.00 49.00 49.00 Third Party & Promo PM 35.00 35.00 35.00 30.00 25.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 25.00 30.00 30.00 1 10/14/2019 3:08 PM GGGC Preliminary Projection 2020_Golf Rates 11.D.3 Packet Pg. 757 Attachment: GGGC Preliminary Projection 2020 Golf Rates (10519 : First Tee Unsolicited Offer) 255.065 Public-private partnerships; public records and public meetings exemptions.— (1) DEFINITIONS.—As used in this section, the term: (a) “Affected local jurisdiction” means a county, municipality, or special district in which all or a portion of a qualifying project is located. (b) “Develop” means to plan, design, finance, lease, acquire, install, construct, or expand. (c) “Fees” means charges imposed by the private entity of a qualifying project for use of all or a portion of such qualifying project pursuant to a comprehensive agreement. (d) “Lease payment” means any form of payment, including a land lease, by a public entity to the private entity of a qualifying project for the use of the project. (e) “Material default” means a nonperformance of it s duties by the private entity of a qualifying project which jeopardizes adequate service to the public from the project. (f) “Operate” means to finance, maintain, improve, equip, modify, or repair. (g) “Private entity” means any natural person, corporation, general partnership, limited liability company, limited partnership, joint venture, business trust, public benefit corporation, nonprofit entity, or other private business entity. (h) “Proposal” means a plan for a qualifying project with detail beyond a conceptual level for which terms such as fixing costs, payment schedules, financing, deliverables, and project schedule are defined. (i) “Qualifying project” means: 1. A facility or project that serves a public purpose, including, but not limite d to, any ferry or mass transit facility, vehicle parking facility, airport or seaport facility, rail facility or project, fuel supply facility, oil or gas pipeline, medical or nursing care facility, recreational facility, sporting or cultural facility, or educational facility or other building or facility that is used or will be used by a public educational institution, or any other public facility or infrastructure that is used or will be used by the public at large or in support of an accepted public purpose or activity; 2. An improvement, including equipment, of a building that will be principally used by a public entity or the public at large or that supports a service delivery system in the public sector; 3. A water, wastewater, or surface water management facility or other related infrastructure; or 4. Notwithstanding any provision of this section, for projects that involve a facility owned or operated by the governing board of a county, district, or municipal hospital or health care system, or projects that involve a facility owned or operated by a municipal electric utility, only those projects that the governing board designates as qualifying projects pursuant to this section. (j) “Responsible public entity” means a county, municipality, school distr ict, special district, or any other political subdivision of the state; a public body corporate and politic; or a regional entity that serves a public purpose and is authorized to develop or operate a qualifying project. 11.D.4 Packet Pg. 758 Attachment: F.S. Sec. 255.065 (10519 : First Tee Unsolicited Offer) (k) “Revenues” means the income, earnings, user fees, lease payments, or other service payments relating to the development or operation of a qualifying project, including, but not limited to, money received as grants or otherwise from the Federal Government, a public entity, or an agency o r instrumentality thereof in aid of the qualifying project. (l) “Service contract” means a contract between a responsible public entity and the private entity which defines the terms of the services to be provided with respect to a qualifying project. (2) LEGISLATIVE FINDINGS AND INTENT.—The Legislature finds that there is a public need for the construction or upgrade of facilities that are used predominantly for public purposes and that it is in the public’s interest to provide for the construction or upgrade of such facilities. (a) The Legislature also finds that: 1. There is a public need for timely and cost-effective acquisition, design, construction, improvement, renovation, expansion, equipping, maintenance, operation, implementation, or installation of projects serving a public purpose, including educational facilities, transportation facilities, water or wastewater management facilities and infrastructure, technology infrastructure, roads, highways, bridges, and other public infrastructure and governm ent facilities within the state which serve a public need and purpose, and that such public need may not be wholly satisfied by existing procurement methods. 2. There are inadequate resources to develop new educational facilities, transportation facilities , water or wastewater management facilities and infrastructure, technology infrastructure, roads, highways, bridges, and other public infrastructure and government facilities for the benefit of residents of this state, and that a public-private partnership has demonstrated that it can meet the needs by improving the schedule for delivery, lowering the cost, and providing other benefits to the public. 3. There may be state and federal tax incentives that promote partnerships between public and private entities to develop and operate qualifying projects. 4. A procurement under this section serves the public purpose of this section if such procurement facilitates the timely development or operation of a qualifying project. (b) It is the intent of the Legislature to encourage investment in the state by private entities; to facilitate various bond financing mechanisms, private capital, and other funding sources for the development and operation of qualifying projects, including expansion and acceleration of such financing to meet the public need; and to provide the greatest possible flexibility to public and private entities contracting for the provision of public services. (3) PROCUREMENT PROCEDURES.—A responsible public entity may receive unsolicited proposals or may solicit proposals for a qualifying project and may thereafter enter into a comprehensive agreement with a private entity, or a consortium of private entities, for the building, upgrading, operating, ownership, or financing of facilities. 11.D.4 Packet Pg. 759 Attachment: F.S. Sec. 255.065 (10519 : First Tee Unsolicited Offer) (a)1. The responsible public entity may establish a reasonable application fee for the submission of an unsolicited proposal under this section. 2. A private entity that submits an unsolicited proposal to a responsible public entity must concurrently pay an initial application fee, as determined by the responsible public entity. Payment must be made by cash, cashier’s check, or other noncancelable instrument. Personal checks may not be accepted. 3. If the initial application fee does not cover the responsible public entity’s costs to evaluate the unsolicited proposal, the responsible public entity must request in writing the additional amounts required. The private entity must pay the requested additional amounts within 30 days after receipt of the notice. The responsible public entity may stop its review of the unsolicited proposal if the private entity fails to pay the additional amounts. 4. If the responsible public entity does not evaluate the unsolicited proposal, the responsible public entity must return the application fee. 5. If the responsible public entity chooses to evaluate an unsolicited proposal involving architecture, engineering, or landscape architecture, it must ensure a professional review and evaluation of the design and construction propos ed by the initial or subsequent proposers to assure material quality standards, interior space utilization, budget estimates, design and construction schedules, and sustainable design and construction standards consistent with public projects. Such review shall be performed by an architect, a landscape architect, or an engineer licensed in this state qualified to perform the review, and such professional shall advise the responsible public entity through completion of the design and construction of the project. (b) The responsible public entity may request a proposal from private entities for a qualifying project or, if the responsible public entity receives an unsolicited proposal for a qualifying project and the responsible public entity intends to enter into a comprehensive agreement for the project described in the unsolicited proposal, the responsible public entity shall publish notice in the Florida Administrative Register and a newspaper of general circulation at least once a week for 2 weeks stating that the responsible public entity has received a proposal and will accept other proposals for the same project. The timeframe within which the responsible public entity may accept other proposals shall be determined by the responsible public entity on a project-by-project basis based upon the complexity of the qualifying project and the public benefit to be gained by allowing a longer or shorter period of time within which other proposals may be received; however, the timeframe for allowing other proposals must be at least 21 days, but no more than 120 days, after the initial date of publication. If approved by a majority vote of the responsible public entity’s governing body, the responsible public entity may alter the timeframe for accepting proposals to more adequately suit the needs of the qualifying project. A copy of the notice must be mailed to each local government in the affected area. 11.D.4 Packet Pg. 760 Attachment: F.S. Sec. 255.065 (10519 : First Tee Unsolicited Offer) (c) If the solicited qualifying project provided in paragraph (b) includes design work, the solicitation must include a design criteria package prepared by an architect, a landscape architect, or an engineer licensed in this state which is sufficient to allow private entities to prepare a bid or a response. The design criteria package must specify reasonably specific criteria for the qualifying project such as the legal description of the site, with survey information; interior space requirements; material quality standards; schematic layouts and conceptual design criteria for the qualifying project; cost or budget estimates; design and construction schedules; and site development and utility requirements. The licensed design professional who prepares the design criteria package shall be retained to serve the responsible public entity through completion of the design and construction of the project. (d) Before approving a comprehensive agreement, the responsible public entity must determine that the proposed project: 1. Is in the public’s best interest. 2. Is for a facility that is owned by the responsible public entity or for a facility for which ownership will be conveyed to the responsible public entity. 3. Has adequate safeguards in place to ensure that additional costs or service disruptions are not imposed on the public in the event of material default or cancellation of the comprehensive agreement by the responsible public entity. 4. Has adequate safeguards in place to ensure that the responsible public entity or private entity has the opportunity to add capacity to the proposed project or other facilities serving sim ilar predominantly public purposes. 5. Will be owned by the responsible public entity upon completion, expiration, or termination of the comprehensive agreement and upon payment of the amounts financed. (e) Before signing a comprehensive agreement, the responsible public entity must consider a reasonable finance plan that is consistent with subsection (9); the qualifying project cost; revenues by source; available financing; major assumptions; internal rate of return on private investments , if governmental funds are assumed in order to deliver a cost-feasible project; and a total cash-flow analysis beginning with the implementation of the project and extending for the term of the comprehensive agreement. (f) In considering an unsolicited proposal, the responsible public entity may require from the private entity a technical study prepared by a nationally recognized expert with experience in preparing analysis for bond rating agencies. In evaluating the technical study, the responsible public entity may rely upon internal staff reports prepared by personnel familiar with the operation of similar facilities or the advice of external advisors or consultants who have relevant experience. 11.D.4 Packet Pg. 761 Attachment: F.S. Sec. 255.065 (10519 : First Tee Unsolicited Offer) (4) PROJECT APPROVAL REQUIREMENTS.—An unsolicited proposal from a private entity for approval of a qualifying project must be accompanied by the following material and information, unless waived by the responsible public entity: (a) A description of the qualifying project, including the conceptual design of the fa cilities or a conceptual plan for the provision of services, and a schedule for the initiation and completion of the qualifying project. (b) A description of the method by which the private entity proposes to secure the necessary property interests that are required for the qualifying project. (c) A description of the private entity’s general plans for financing the qualifying project, including the sources of the private entity’s funds and the identity of any dedicated revenue source or proposed debt or equity investment on behalf of the private entity. (d) The name and address of a person who may be contacted for additional information concerning the proposal. (e) The proposed user fees, lease payments, or other service payments over the term of a comprehensive agreement, and the methodology for and circumstances that would allow changes to the user fees, lease payments, and other service payments over time. (f) Additional material or information that the responsible public entity reasonably requests. Any pricing or financial terms included in an unsolicited proposal must be specific as to when the pricing or terms expire. (5) PROJECT QUALIFICATION AND PROCESS.— (a) The private entity, or the applicable party or parties of the private entity’s team, must mee t the minimum standards contained in the responsible public entity’s guidelines for qualifying professional services and contracts for traditional procurement projects. (b) The responsible public entity must: 1. Ensure that provision is made for the private entity’s performance and payment of subcontractors, including, but not limited to, surety bonds, letters of credit, parent company guarantees, and lender and equity partner guarantees. For the components of the qualifying project which involve construction performance and payment, bonds are required and are subject to the recordation, notice, suit limitation, and other requirements of s. 255.05. 2. Ensure the most efficient pricing of the security package that provides for the performance and payment of subcontractors. 3. Ensure that the comprehensive agreement addresses termination upon a material default of the comprehensive agreement. (c) After the public notification period has expired in the case of an unsolicited proposal, the responsible public entity shall rank the proposals received in order of preference. In ranking the 11.D.4 Packet Pg. 762 Attachment: F.S. Sec. 255.065 (10519 : First Tee Unsolicited Offer) proposals, the responsible public entity may consider factors that include, but are not limited to, professional qualifications, general business terms, innovative design techniques or cost -reduction terms, and finance plans. The responsible public entity may then begin negotiations for a comprehensive agreement with the highest-ranked firm. If the responsible public entity is not satisfied with the results of the negotiations, the responsible public entity may terminate negotiations with the proposer and negotiate with the second-ranked or subsequent-ranked firms, in the order consistent with this procedure. If only one proposal is received, the responsible public entity may negotiate in good faith, and if the responsible public entity is not satisfied with the results of the negotiations, the responsible public entity may terminate negotiations with the proposer. Notwithstanding this paragraph, the responsible public entity may reject all proposals at any point in the process until a contract with the proposer is executed. (d) The responsible public entity shall perform an independent analysis of the proposed public - private partnership which demonstrates the cost-effectiveness and overall public benefit before the procurement process is initiated or before the contract is awarded. (e) The responsible public entity may approve the development or operation of an educational facility, a transportation facility, a water or wastewater management facility or related infrastructure, a technology infrastructure or other public infrastructure, or a government facility needed by the responsible public entity as a qualifying project, or the design or equipping of a qualifying project that is developed or operated, if: 1. There is a public need for or benefit derived from a project of the type that the private entity proposes as the qualifying project. 2. The estimated cost of the qualifying project is reasonable in relation to similar facilities. 3. The private entity’s plans will result in the timely acquisition, design, construction, improvement, renovation, expansion, equipping, maintenance, or operation of the qualifying project. (f) The responsible public entity may charge a reasonable fee to cover the costs of processing, reviewing, and evaluating the request, including, but not limited to, reasonable attorney fees and fees for financial and technical advisors or consultants and for other necessary advisors or consultants. (g) Upon approval of a qualifying project, the responsible public entity shall establish a date for the commencement of activities related to the qualifying project. The responsible public entity may extend the commencement date. (h) Approval of a qualifying project by the responsible public entity is subject to entering into a comprehensive agreement with the private entity. (6) INTERIM AGREEMENT.—Before or in connection with the negotiation of a comprehensive agreement, the responsible public entity may enter into an interim agreement with the private entity proposing the development or operation of the qualifying project. An interim agreement does not obligate the responsible public entity to enter into a comprehensive agreement. The interim 11.D.4 Packet Pg. 763 Attachment: F.S. Sec. 255.065 (10519 : First Tee Unsolicited Offer) agreement is discretionary with the parties and is not required on a qualifying project for which the parties may proceed directly to a comprehensive agreement without the need for an interim agreement. An interim agreement must be limited to provisions that: (a) Authorize the private entity to commence activities for which it may be compensated related to the proposed qualifying project, including, but not limited to, project planning and development, design, environmental analysis and mitigation, survey, other activities concerning any part of the proposed qualifying project, and ascertaining the availability of financing for the proposed facility or facilities. (b) Establish the process and timing of the negotiation of the comprehensive agreement. (c) Contain such other provisions related to an aspect of the development or operation of a qualifying project that the responsible public entity and the private entity deem appropriate. (7) COMPREHENSIVE AGREEMENT.— (a) Before developing or operating the qualifying project, the private entity must enter into a comprehensive agreement with the responsible public entity. The comprehensive agreement must provide for: 1. Delivery of performance and payment bonds, letters of credit, or other security acceptable to the responsible public entity in connection with the development or operation of the qualifying project in the form and amount satisfactory to the responsible public entity. For the components of the qualifying project which involve construction, the form and amount of the bonds must comply with s. 255.05. 2. Review of the design for the qualifying project by the responsible public entity and, if the design conforms to standards acceptable to the responsible public entity, the approval of the responsible public entity. This subparagraph does not require the private entity to complete the design of the qualifying project before the execution of the comprehensive agreement. 3. Inspection of the qualifying project by the responsible public entity to ensure that the private entity’s activities are acceptable to the responsible public entity in accordance with the comprehensive agreement. 4. Maintenance of a policy of public liability insurance, a copy of which must be filed with the responsible public entity and accompanied by proofs of coverage, or self -insurance, each in the form and amount satisfactory to the responsible public entity and reasonably sufficient to ensure coverage of tort liability to the public and employees and to enable the continued operation of the qualifying project. 5. Monitoring by the responsible public entity of the maintenance practices to be performed by the private entity to ensure that the qualifying project is properly maintained. 6. Periodic filing by the private entity of the appropriate financial statements that pertain to the qualifying project. 11.D.4 Packet Pg. 764 Attachment: F.S. Sec. 255.065 (10519 : First Tee Unsolicited Offer) 7. Procedures that govern the rights and responsibilities of the responsible public entity and the private entity in the course of the construction and operation of the qualifying project and in the event of the termination of the comprehensive agreement or a material default by the private entity. The procedures must include conditions that govern the assumption of the duties and responsibilities of the private entity by an entity that funded, in whole or part, the qualifying project or by the responsible public entity, and must provide for the transfer or purchase of property or other interests of the private entity by the responsible public entity. 8. Fees, lease payments, or service payments. In negotiating user fees, the fees must be the same for persons using the facility under like conditions and must not materially discourage use of the qualifying project. The execution of the comprehensive agreement or a subsequent amendment is conclusive evidence that the fees, lease payments, or service payments provided for in the comprehensive agreement comply with this section. Fees or lease payments established in the comprehensive agreement as a source of revenue may be in addition to, or in lieu of, service payments. 9. Duties of the private entity, including the terms and conditions that the responsible public entity determines serve the public purpose of this section. (b) The comprehensive agreement may include: 1. An agreement by the responsible public entity to make grants or loans to the private entity from amounts received from the federal, state, or local government or an agency or instrumentality thereof. 2. A provision under which each entity agrees to provide notice of default and cure rights for the benefit of the other entity, including, but not limited to, a provision regarding unavoidable delays. 3. A provision that terminates the authority and duties of the private entity under this secti on and dedicates the qualifying project to the responsible public entity or, if the qualifying project was initially dedicated by an affected local jurisdiction, to the affected local jurisdiction for public use. (8) FEES.—A comprehensive agreement entered into pursuant to this section may authorize the private entity to impose fees to members of the public for the use of the facility. The following provisions apply to the comprehensive agreement: (a) The responsible public entity may develop new facilities or increase capacity in existing facilities through a comprehensive agreement with a private entity. (b) The comprehensive agreement must ensure that the facility is properly operated, maintained, or improved in accordance with standards set forth in the comprehensive agreement. (c) The responsible public entity may lease existing fee-for-use facilities through a comprehensive agreement. (d) Any revenues must be authorized by and applied in the manner set forth in the comprehensive agreement. 11.D.4 Packet Pg. 765 Attachment: F.S. Sec. 255.065 (10519 : First Tee Unsolicited Offer) (e) A negotiated portion of revenues from fee-generating uses may be returned to the responsible public entity over the life of the comprehensive agreement. (9) FINANCING.— (a) A private entity may enter into a private-source financing agreement between financing sources and the private entity. A financing agreement and any liens on the property or facility must be paid in full at the applicable closing that transfers ownership or operation of the facility to the responsible public entity at the conclusion of the term of the comprehensive agreement. (b) The responsible public entity may lend funds to private entities that construct projects containing facilities that are approved under this section. (c) The responsible public entity may use innovative finance techniques associated with a public- private partnership under this section, including, but not limited to, federal loans as provided in Titles 23 and 49 C.F.R., commercial bank loans, and hedges against inflation from commercial banks or other private sources. In addition, the responsible public entity may provide its own capital or operating budget to support a qualifying project. The budget may be from any legally permissible funding sources of the responsible public entity, including the proceeds of debt issuances. A responsible public entity may use the model financing agreement provided in s. 489.145(6) for its financing of a facility owned by a responsible public entity. A financing agreement may not require the responsible public entity to indemnify the financing source, subject the responsible public entity’s facility to liens in violation of s. 11.066(5), or secure financing of the responsible public entity by a mortgage on, or security interest in, the real or tangible personal property of the responsible public entity in a manner that could result in the loss of the fee ownership of the property by the responsible public entity, and any such provision is void. (10) POWERS AND DUTIES OF THE PRIVATE ENTITY.— (a) The private entity shall: 1. Develop or operate the qualifying project in a manner that is acceptable to the responsible public entity in accordance with the provisions of the comprehensive agreement. 2. Maintain, or provide by contract for the maintenance or improvement of, the qualifying project if required by the comprehensive agreement. 3. Cooperate with the responsible public entity in making best efforts to establish interconnection between the qualifying project and any other facility or infrastructure as r equested by the responsible public entity in accordance with the provisions of the comprehensive agreement. 4. Comply with the comprehensive agreement and any lease or service contract. (b) Each private facility that is constructed pursuant to this section must comply with the requirements of federal, state, and local laws; state, regional, and local comprehensive plans; the responsible public entity’s rules, procedures, and standards for facilities; and such other conditions 11.D.4 Packet Pg. 766 Attachment: F.S. Sec. 255.065 (10519 : First Tee Unsolicited Offer) that the responsible public entity determines to be in the public’s best interest and that are included in the comprehensive agreement. (c) The responsible public entity may provide services to the private entity. An agreement for maintenance and other services entered into pursuant to this section must provide for full reimbursement for services rendered for qualifying projects. (d) A private entity of a qualifying project may provide additional services for the qualifying project to the public or to other private entities if the provision of additional services does not impair the private entity’s ability to meet its commitments to the responsible public entity pursuant to the comprehensive agreement. (11) EXPIRATION OR TERMINATION OF AGREEMENTS.—Upon the expiration or termination of a comprehensive agreement, the responsible public entity may use revenues from the qualifying project to pay current operation and maintenance costs of the qualifying project. If the private entity materially defaults under the comprehensive agreement, the compensation that is otherwise due to the private entity is payable to satisfy all financial obligations to investors and lenders on the qualifying project in the same way that is provided in the comprehensive agreement or any other agreement involving the qualifying project, if the costs of operating and maintaining the qualifying project are paid in the normal course. Revenues in excess of the costs for operation and maintenance costs may be paid to the investors and lenders to satisfy payment obligations under their respective agreements. A responsible public entity may terminate with cause and without prejudice a comprehensive agreement and may exercise any other rights or remedies that may be available to it in accordance with the provisions of the comprehensive agreement. The full faith and credit of the responsible public entity may not be pledged to secure the financing of the private entity. The assumption of the development or operation of the qualifying project does not obligate the responsible public entity to pay any obligation of the private entity from sources other than revenues from the qualifying project unless stated otherwise in the comprehensive agreement. (12) SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY.—This section does not waive the sovereign immunity of a responsible public entity, an affected local jurisdiction, or an officer or employee thereof with respect to participation in, or approval of, any part of a qualifying project or its operation, including, but not limited to, interconnection of the qualifying project with any other infrastructure or project. A county or municipality in which a qualifying project is located possesses sovereign immunity with respect to the project, including, but not limited to, its design, construction, and opera tion. (13) DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES.— (a) A responsible public entity may provide a copy of its comprehensive agreement to the Department of Management Services. A responsible public entity must redact any confidential or exempt information from the copy of the comprehensive agreement before providing it to the Department of Management Services. 11.D.4 Packet Pg. 767 Attachment: F.S. Sec. 255.065 (10519 : First Tee Unsolicited Offer) (b) The Department of Management Services may accept and maintain copies of comprehensive agreements received from responsible public entities for the purpose of sharing comprehensive agreements with other responsible public entities. (c) This subsection does not require a responsible public entity to provide a copy of its comprehensive agreement to the Department of Management Services. (14) CONSTRUCTION.— (a) This section shall be liberally construed to effectuate the purposes of this section. (b) This section shall be construed as cumulative and supplemental to any other authority or power vested in or exercised by the governing body of a county, municipality, special district, or municipal hospital or health care system including those contained in acts of the Legislature. (c) This section does not affect any agreement or existing relationship with a supporting organization involving such governing body or system in effect as of January 1, 2013. (d) This section provides an alternative method and does not limit a county, municipality, special district, or other political subdivision of the state in the procurement or operation of a qualifying project pursuant to other statutory or constitutional authority. (e) Except as otherwise provided in this section, this section does not amend existing laws by granting additional powers to, or further restricting, a local governmental entity from regulat ing and entering into cooperative arrangements with the private sector for the planning, construction, or operation of a facility. (f) This section does not waive any requirement of s. 287.055. (15) PUBLIC RECORDS AND PUBLIC MEETINGS EXEMPTIONS.— (a) As used in this subsection, the term “competitive solicitation” has the same meaning as provided in s. 119.071(1). (b)1. An unsolicited proposal received by a responsible public entity is exempt from s. 119.07(1) and s. 24(a), Art. I of the State Constitution until such time as the responsible public entity provides notice of an intended decision for a qualifying project. 2. If the responsible public entity rejects all proposals submitted pursuant to a competitive solicitation for a qualifying project and such entity concurrently provides notice of its intent to seek additional proposals for such project, the unsolicited proposal remains exempt until the responsible public entity provides notice of an intended decision concerning the reissued competitive solicitation for the qualifying project or until the responsible public entity withdraws the reissued competitive solicitation for such project. 3. An unsolicited proposal is exempt for no longer than 90 days after the initial notice by the responsible public entity rejecting all proposals. 11.D.4 Packet Pg. 768 Attachment: F.S. Sec. 255.065 (10519 : First Tee Unsolicited Offer) (c) If the responsible public entity does not issue a competitive solicitation for a qualifying project, the unsolicited proposal ceases to be exempt 180 days after receipt of the unsolicited proposal by such entity. (d)1. Any portion of a meeting of a responsible public entity during which an un solicited proposal that is exempt is discussed is exempt from s. 286.011 and s. 24(b), Art. I of the State Constitution. 2.a. A complete recording must be made of any portion of an exempt meeting. No portion of the exempt meeting may be held off the record. b. The recording of, and any records generated during, the exempt meeting are exempt from s. 119.07(1) and s. 24(a), Art. I of the State Constitution until such time as the responsible public entity provides notice of an intended decision for a qualifying project or 180 days after receipt of the unsolicited proposal by the responsible public entity if such entity does not issue a competitive solicitation for the project. c. If the responsible public entity rejects all proposals and concurrently provides notice of its intent to reissue a competitive solicitation, the recording and any records generated at the exempt meeting remain exempt from s. 119.07(1) and s. 24(a), Art. I of the State Constitution until such time as the responsible public entity provides notice of an intended decision concerning the reissued competitive solicitation or until the responsible public entity withdraws the reissued competitive solicitation for such project. d. A recording and any records generated during an exempt meeting are exempt for no longer than 90 days after the initial notice by the responsible public entity rejecting all proposals. (e) This subsection is subject to the Open Government Sunset Review Act in accordance with s. 119.15 and shall stand repealed on October 2, 2021, unless reviewed and saved from repeal through reenactment by the Legislature. History.—s. 2, ch. 2013-223; s. 1, ch. 2016-153; s. 1, ch. 2016-154. Note.—Former s. 287.05712. 11.D.4 Packet Pg. 769 Attachment: F.S. Sec. 255.065 (10519 : First Tee Unsolicited Offer)