Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Ex Parte
Ex Parte Disclosure - Commissioner Andy Solis COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING September 24, 2019 Page 1 of 2 ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS 9•B. This item requires ex parte disclosure be provided by the Commission members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve an Ordinance amending Ordinance Number 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, which established the comprehensive zoning regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida, by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of the herein described real property from a Rural Agricultural (A)zoning district, part of which is within a Special Treatment (ST) overlay, and a Residential Planned Unit Development(RPUD) known as the Della Rosa RPUD, part of which is within a Special Treatment(ST)overlay,to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD)zoning district for the project to be known as the Allura RPUD, to allow construction of a maximum of 304 multi-family dwelling units on property located on the south side of Veterans-Memorial Boulevard, just east of Livingston Road, in Section 13,Township 48 South, Range 25 East, consisting of 35.92± acres; providing for the repeal of Ordinance No. 07-73; and by providing for an effective date. (This is a companion to agenda item 9.A). NO DISCLOSURE FOR THIS ITEM SEE FILE XI Meetings ® Correspondence ® e-mails IX Calls Met with: Robert Mulhere, Rich Yovanovich, Brian Stock, Keith Gelder, Robert Pritt; representatives from Barrington Cove, Mediterra, The Strand Calls, letters, emails from potential neighbors of the project CONSENT AGENDA 16.A.8. This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve for recording the minor final plat of Vyne House at Talis Park Tract"B" Replat,Application Number PL20190000891. X NO DISCLOSURE FOR THIS ITEM SEE FILE I I Meetings I f Correspondence I I e-mails I I Calls SUMMARY AGENDA Ex Parte Disclosure - Commissioner Andy Solis COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING September 24, 2019 Page 2 of 2 17.A. This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve an Ordinance amending Ordinance Number 2004-41, the Collier County Land Development Code, by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of an additional 5.85± acres of land zoned Planned Unit Development to the Siena Lakes CCRC CPUD; by amending Ordinance Number 09-65, as amended, the Siena Lakes CCRC CPUD,to add 5.85±acres from the Orange Blossom Gardens PUD to the Siena Lakes CCRC CPUD; by increasing the maximum square footage from 764,478 to 878,889 square feet; by increasing the maximum number of independent living units from 355 to 431 units and increasing the maximum number of assisted living beds from 35 to 47 beds; by adding sales and marketing as a permitted indoor accessory use; by reducing setbacks from the south and west property lines, by reducing the minimum square footage of assisted living units, by increasing the landscape buffer on the south property line, and revising the master plan to reflect the additional acreage and modified site layout; by adding one deviation and removing one deviation relating to landscape buffers, and modifying developer commitments.The subject property is located on the north side of Orange Blossom Drive,just east of Airport-Pulling Road, in Section 1, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 35.1±acres; providing for repeal of the Orange Blossom Gardens PUD, Ordinance Number 92-75, as amended;and by providing an effective date. [PL20180001174] NO DISCLOSURE FOR THIS ITEM SEE FILE Fl Meetings I I Correspondence 171 e-mails I I Calls Met with Robert Mulhere & Rich Yovanovich in 2018 Emails from neighbor in Lakeside GoodnerAngela From: Larry Waller <wallerlarry64@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2019 8:52 AM To: SolisAndy; FialaDonna; McDanielBill; burt.sounders@colliercountyfl.gov; TaylorPenny Subject: Allura Hello Commissioners, We continue to strongly oppose the rezoning to allow apartments. We implore you to vote NO on this upcoming issue today. We live in the Strand and know the impact it will have on traffic on overcrowded Immokalee road as well as property values. Sincerely, Larry Waller Rebecca Wilder 6017 Trophy Drive #603 Naples FL 34110 GoodnerAngela From: Mark Roos <markdroosl @gmail.com> Sent: Monday, September 23, 2019 3:19 PM To: SolisAndy Subject: Fwd: Project Allura Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Dear Commissioner Solis- I corresponded with you in March regarding Project Allura and I have attended many of the public Collier County meetings on this project. I plan to participate in tomorrow's meeting as well. I support the substantial and growing number of citizens in opposition to this project. I've spoken before the Commissioners twice about my traffic and emergency response concerns. Interstate 75 traffic uses Livingston Road as an alternate route. Adding additional vehicles to the intersection of Veterans Parkway and Livingston from an apartment complex will further limit emergency responders based in the adjacent fire station. As my videos showed, emergency responders may already be unable to reach situations between Veterans Parkway and Bonita Beach Road during heavy traffic periods. I recognize that certain zoning was approved ten years ago, but the community and its needs have changed. Quite frankly, I am surprised that Stock Development continues to press the Commissioners on this project considering the public opposition. Clearly Stock plans to sell the buildings at completion to an investor group and not to participate in the community. I urge you to vote against this project. Regards Mark D. Roos 16501 Buonasera Court Naples, FL 34110 Mobile 716-572-3426 Forwarded message From: SolisAndy<Andy.Solis@colliercountyfl.gov> Date: Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 2:26 PM Subject: RE: Project Allura To: Mark Roos<markdroos1@gmail.com> Hello, Mr. Roos: Thank you for sharing your thoughts on the proposed Allura project. Though the volume of emails is too great for him to reply individually, Commissioner Solis appreciates when citizens share their concerns about a topic, and he reviews every email he is sent. He may reach out to you to gather more information if it seems appropriate but know that even if we do not contact you again, your voice has been heard. In case you were not able to attend or watch either of the Planning Commission meetings at which this project was discussed, you can see the first one HERE (discussion of this project begins at about 1:36), and the second one HERE. This can be helpful to those who aren't yet aware that about half the land included in this proposal has been zoned since 2007 for 4-story apartments; these previously approved buildings can be built with no further input from either the Planning Commission or the current Board of County Commissioners. You are probably aware that the Allura proposal will be heard today at Board of County Commissioners meeting, beginning shortly. If you wish, you can watch it live on the web, HERE, or on your cable channel 97. Shortly following the conclusion of the meeting, a video will be available for viewing on demand HERE. Thank you for taking the time to be an engaged member of our community. Please feel free to call or email whenever we can be of assistance. Sent on behalf of Commissioner Andy Solis, by Angela Goodner, Executive Coordinator Andy Solis, Esq., District 2 Commissioner Collier County Board of County Commissioners Phone: 239.252.8602 Fax: 239.252.6947 Sign up for the District 2 newsletter HERE! Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone at 239-252-8602 or in writing at 3299 Tamiami Trail E,Suite 303, Naples, FL 34112. From: Mark Roos<markdroos1@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, March 25, 2019 10:18 PM To: SolisAndy<Andy.Solis@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Project Allura Dear Mr. Solis I am greatly concerned about the public safety implications of the proposed Stock Development Project Allura. The additional housing density proposed for this project could potentially add nearly 600 additional vehicles per day to Livingston Road, which is already a significant North/South route during early morning and late afternoon. As you know, Livingston Road is a relatively convenient detour for 175 drivers when there is an incident on the interstate. I walked from the Mediterra entrance past the fire station near Veteran's Memorial Parkway to the Barrington Cove neighborhood on March 7th and observed the traffic situation. In the late afternoon all three North-bound lanes of Livingston were completely congested from below the fire station up to Bonita Beach Road. Based on my observations, it would be nearly impossible for emergency services to respond to a need in the neighborhoods bounded by these two routes during high-traffic periods. Adding an additional 300-600 vehicles with an apartment complex would virtually guarantee that emergency responders could not reach a situation in time to save a life. If additional higher-density housing is needed in Collier County, I believe there are other locations with traffic patterns that would involve much less risk to public safety. I would appreciate your sharing these videos with other members of the Collier County Board of Commissioners. Thank you. Mark Roos 16501 Buonasera Court Naples, FL 34110 716-572-3426 RIMaEoUvRNOF97GUOKrrVQ.jpg s4RWDhwzQwSIsQfJAgV3zA.MOV YzJm28IFT6mZfvVY9bCtIw.MOV GoodnerAngela From: David Ortbals <dwomjo@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, September 23, 2019 2:41 PM To: SolisAndy Subject: Allura Apartment Project Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Dear Mr. Solis: Thank you for sending me the courtesy notice of the hearing date and time of the Board of County Commissioners Meeting on September 24, 2019 regarding the Allura Apartment Project. I am planning to attend. I have previously sent you correspondence regarding my thoughts on this proposal, so I will not burden you with a rehash of those objections. I am simply writing today to again request that you consider the UNANIMOUS opposition of the constituents you represent who reside in the directly impacted by this project. This is simply not the appropriate use of this property in the midst of a wide swath of single family,villa, and condominium homes. We live in a Stock home and I am pleased with their product but and I am terribly disappointed with their refusal to consider alternative housing uses for this piece of property. Quite simple this is an attempt to maximize dollar return at the expense of the surrounding neighborhoods. I look forward to seeing you tomorrow. Sincerely, David and Jane Ortbals 16511 Buonasera Court Naples, Florida 34110 GoodnerAngela From: Madeleine Gunderson <madeleine.gunderson@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, September 23, 2019 10:11 AM To: SolisAndy Subject: Re: STOP the ALLURA PROJECT Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Our voices will be heard when the project is voted down and zoning changed. Things were different in 2007. You will not get my vote in next election if u do not vote against this project. Residents in this areas lives will be impacted terribly if you make this decision to allow Allura. Yes vote for Allura is no vote for you. Thank you. Sent from my iPhone On Sep 23, 2019, at 9:56 AM, SolisAndy<Andy.Solis@colliercountyfl.gov>wrote: Thank you for sharing your thoughts on the proposed Allura project. We know that it takes time and effort to be an active member of the community; your willingness to be involved is appreciated. While the volume of emails received at the District 2 office is too great for Commissioner Solis to reply individually, he reviews each one and may reach out to you to gather more information if it seems appropriate. Know that even if he does not contact you again, your voice has been heard. If you were unable to attend any of the prior hearings on this project, you may not be aware that about half the land included in the Allura proposal is already zoned for 4-story apartments, and has been since 2007, in a PUD called Della Rosa. It unfortunately comes as a surprise to many neighbors, but apartments were planned there before most of the surrounding homes were built. Allura is proposed as an alternative to that earlier PUD by the new property owner, but the Della Rosa apartments were approved by prior County Commissioners and nothing can be done now to prevent them from being built. And you probably are also aware that the Board of County Commissioners will hear this proposal at their meeting tomorrow. This meeting will be held at the government complex at 3299 Tamiami Trail East-- marked 'County Admin' on this map; the meeting begins at 9am and this hearing will occur at or shortly after 10am. You are invited to attend, or you can watch it live online, or on local cable channel 97. Shortly following the meeting, the video will be available to watch on demand. Thanks again for taking the time to be an engaged citizen; it is so important to the process. Please feel free to call or email whenever we can be of assistance. Sent on behalf of Commissioner Solis by Angela Goodner, Executive Coordinator Andy Solis, Esq., District 2 Commissioner Collier County Board of County Commissioners Phone: 239.252.8602 Fax: 239.252.6947 Sign up for the District 2 newsletter HERE! Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone at 239-252-8602 or in writing at 3299 Tamiami Trail E,Suite 303, Naples,FL 34112. From: Madeleine Gunderson <madeleine.gunderson@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, September 20, 2019 3:02 PM To:SolisAndy<Andy.Solis@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject:STOP the ALLURA PROJECT Please vote AGAINST the ALLURA Project. Go down in history as making the right decision for the citizens of Naples. I live at The Strand near the proposed Allura Project and am very concerned about the negative impact building a 300+ unit apartments complex will have at this location. Livingston Road &Veteran's Memorial Parkway cannot handle the additional increase in traffic, quality of life and environmental issues this Project will bring.As it is,the traffic on Livingston Road already backs up from Veterans Memorial Parkway to Bonita Beach Rd every rush hour.The proposed Allura apartment complex will cause an already intolerable situation to become even worst. In addition, 3-story buildings at this site does not fit the neighborhood private residential environment.This massive complex DOES NOT FIT! Thank you. GoodnerAngela From: Ben Gunderson <gunderson.ben@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, September 20, 2019 3:43 PM To: McDanielBill; SaundersBurt; TaylorPenny; FialaDonna; SolisAndy Subject: VOTE NO on the ALLURA Appartments Project Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed I am opposed to the Stock Development "Allura Project" on Livingston Road & Veterans Memorial in Naples. The 300+ apartment unit complex on a small parcel of residential land in my community makes no sense. This project dose not fit in our neighborhood. The land should never be zoned for a massive apartment complex. The roads cannot handle the traffic and will further exaserbate the traffic issue in our neighborhood. It will negatively affect the quality of our lives. I testified about my opposition and many concerns regarding this project at the PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING. The facts are clear. This project will negatively effect the quality of life in our community. Stop giving approval to Stock Development on very project. This one is an abomination. Please vote AGAINST the ALLURA Project. Go down in history as making the right decision for the citizens of Naples. Sincerely Bernard Gunderson 5980 Pinnacle Lane #2101 Naples, Fl 34110 GoodnerAngela From: Madeleine Gunderson <madeleine.gunderson@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, September 20, 2019 3:02 PM To: SolisAndy Subject: STOP the ALLURA PROJECT Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed Please vote AGAINST the ALLURA Project. Go down in history as making the right decision for the citizens of Naples. I live at The Strand near the proposed Allura Project and am very concerned about the negative impact building a 300+ unit apartments complex will have at this location. Livingston Road &Veteran's Memorial Parkway cannot handle the additional increase in traffic, quality of life and environmental issues this Project will bring.As it is,the traffic on Livingston Road already backs up from Veterans Memorial Parkway to Bonita Beach Rd every rush hour. The proposed Allura apartment complex will cause an already intolerable situation to become even worst. In addition, 3-story buildings at this site does not fit the neighborhood private residential environment.This massive complex DOES NOT FIT! Thank you. GoodnerAngela From: David W. Depew <planning@M-DA.com> Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2019 4:53 PM To: BosiMichael; SchmidtCorby Cc: FialaDonna; SolisAndy; SaundersBurt; TaylorPenny; McDanielBill; Tim Richards; Pritt, Robert Subject: Allura; PL20170004419/CP-2018-1; PL20170004385 Attachments: 18092-19-09-19 Alternate Language.pdf Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Dear Mr. Bosi: Attached please find a summary of the substance of my remarks to the Planning Commission regarding the Allura development. At the request of Attorney Robert Pritt, I am forwarding this to you, and copying the commissioners so that they will have this language prior to the hearing next Tuesday. As I noted to the Planning Commission, while the preferred option would be to deny the plan amendment, an alternative option would be to limit the number of dwelling units to no more than 4 units per acre, consistent with the highest density currently approved in the vicinity of the subject property. have included modifications to the proposed conditions that would reflect the compatibility concerns that have been raised by the neighboring communities. Thank you in advance for you kind consideration. Regards, th Anniversary David W. Depew lt RRIS PhD, AICP, LEED®AP Principal &Co-Founder D W Main Office:(239) Toll Free:(866)337-7341993 Cell:(239)850-6937 ENGINEERS • PLANNERS • SURVEYORS 2914 Cleveland Avenue LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS Fort Myers,FL 33901 495 Grand Boulevard,Suite 206 Destin,FL 32550 FORT MYERS I TALLAHASSEE I DESTIN PLANNING(cr9M DA.COM WWW.MORRIS-DEPEW.COM 4 W ‘;,* illb Professional Services Since 1989 a My 721 veard Think Green.Please print this e-mail only if necessary. IMPORTANT NOTICE The information contained in this transmission is privileged and confidential. It is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named in the address lines above.If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient,you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error,please notify Morris-Depew Associates,Inc.immediately by telephone,toll free,at(866)337-7341 and return the original message.Although this E-mail and any attachments are believed to be free of any virus or other defect that might affect any computer system into which it is received and opened,it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free and no responsibility is accepted by Morris-Depew Associates,Inc.for damage arising in any way from its use.Thank you. EXHIBT B ALLURA RPUD DEVLOPMENT AND DESIGN STANDARDS The table below sets forth the development standards for the RPUD. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or subdivision plat, as the case may be. 1. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS MULTI- COMMUNITY STANDARD RECREATION FAMILY FACILITIES PRINCIPAL STRUCTURES MIN. LOT AREA 10,000 N/A S.F. MIN. LOT WIDTH 100 FEET N/A MIN. FLOOR AREA 650 N/A S.F./D.U. MINUMUM REQUIRED YARDS FROM LIVINGSTON ROAD 50 FEET 50 FEET FROM VETERANS 48 85 MEMORIAL BLVD. FEET 85 FEET FROM ALL OTHER PUD 20 50 PERIMETER BOUNDARIES FEET 2-8 50 FEET FROM PRESERVE 25 FEET 25 FEET FROM WATERBODY 1 0 FEET 0 FEET MIN. DISTANCE BETWEEN STRUCTURES 20 FEET 20 FEET MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT 50 35 NOT TO EXCEED (ZONED) FEET2 35 FEET MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT 0A 45 NOT TO EXCEED (ACTUAL) FEET 2 42 FEET ACCESSORY STRUCTURES FROM LIVINGSTON ROAD S.P.S. 3 N/A PL20170004419/CP-2018-1;PL20170004385 Altura PUD(PUDR);Alternate Language Page 4 of 10 FROM VETERANS MEMORIAL BLVD. S.P.S. 3 N/A FROM ALL OTHER PUD 4-S 50 PERIMETER BOUNDARIES FEET N/A FROM PRESERVE 10 FEET N/A MIN. DISTANCE BETWEEN STRUCTURES 10 FEET N/A MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT 25 NOT TO EXCEED (ZONED) FEET 4 N/A MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT 44 35 NOT TO EXCEED (ACTUAL) FEET 4 N/A 1. Measured from lake maintenance easement or bulkhead. 2. Inclusive of any under building parking. 3. The setback from Livingston Road and Veteran's Memorial Blvd. for one-story parking structures or carports shall be 20 feet. 4. The maximum actual height for parking structures is limited to 35 feet 2. DESIGN STANDARDS A. PUD access points will be gated. B. Buildings will be constructed with Concrete Masonry Unit construction or concrete construction. C. Roofs shall be cement or slate tile roof or approved equivalent (asphalt shingles prohibited). PL20170004419/CP-2018-1;PL20170004385 Altura PUD(PUDR);Alternate Language Page 5of10 L - - - - - , - - — ZONED:ROW (VETERANS MEMORIAL BOULEVARD) or' "( 2V TYPE"D"BUFFER O N y INTERCONN ONTO -- / ^"sm�n � , — — ADJACENT COM ERCfAL 1 � 1� / 50'106' Buffer PARCEL MAY BjHE RELOCATED IN EVENT ZONED:RPUD GPARCEL ZONED:Cl —18TYPE'B'BUFFER (BRANDON) IS REZONED TO (VACANT) COMMERCIAL I i, R 20' Type C Uuff.e� 150 300' CAL E:1"=300' iy KE- ZONED:AG 10'TYPE"A"BUFFER (VACANT) 200.8' I -",....."......^,40-146),.."...../\'./\' 50' Type C Buffer __217.5 LTp–TypE•A"BUFFER-.- ;,., —\ \-..._ PROPERTY BOUNDARY / + + eta ,Wr, .uw ur .,.. Alli, 4144. 20'TYPE"D"1BUFFER---,� + + o EGRESS / ,,6 , ,, W. 20' Type C Buffer 1 p ONLY WW • ; 1 + y - _uWZ .PRESERVE` . J WWR +Ww 114.74 AC) __ 4,, ZONED:RPUD • +. + " (BRANDON) 1 ' .. aiibir 414i4 441. ,W. Atli *Wt. 1 1 I' ' .,. + - ' 1 - 15'TYPE I ) `)' "B"BUFFER "' w+., -4" "4 W(, ,W,. ,uu,. 1 `i ZONED:CU + _ + *WL aw, t (NORTH + ' + ‘U - NAPLES FIRE) y. +u4+. u+uc avur LEGEND ZONED:ACI (VACANT) NOTES_ R RESIDENTIAL TRACT 1. OPEN SPACE SHALL BE PROVIDED THROUGH THE USE VEHICULAR OF THE ONSITE PRESERVE.LAKE,LANDSCAPE F� iNGR HICUL R BUFFERS.AND COMMON OPEN SPACE IN THE VEHICULAR RESIDENTIAL TRACT.MINIMUM OPEN SPACE=60%OF �,m EGRESS ONLY TOTAL AREA(21.34 AC) 2. NATIVE VEGETATION RETENTION REQUIRED:A MINIMUM OF 8.37 ACRES(25%OF EXISTING ON SITE NATIVE VEGETATION). LAND USE BREAKDOWN PROVIDED:14.74 ACRES 142 AREA(SF) AREA(AC) PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL 3. PRESERVES MAY BE USED TO SATISFY THE LANDSCAPE RESIDENTIAL TRACT(4.2)3DWELLING UNITS) 773.626 17.76 49.93% BUFFER REQUIREMENTS AFTER EXOTIC VEGETATION REMOVAL IN ACCORDANCE WITH LDC SECTIONS 4.06.02 PRESERVE 642.074 14.74 41.44% LAKE AND 4.06.05.E.1.SUPPLEMENTAL PLANTINGS WITH 133,729 3.07 8.63% NATIVE PLANT MATERIALS,IF REQUIRED.SHALL BE IN TOTAL 1,549,429 35.57 100.00% ACCORDANCE WITH LDC SECTION 3.05.07. # DATE REVISIONS J.R.EVANS ENGINEERING,P.A. 9351 CORKSCREW ROAD,SUITE 102 ALLURA FLORIDA J.R. EVANS EPHONE:(239)405.91488 ENGINEERING FAX:(239)28&2537 MASTER CONCEPT PLAN WWW.JREVANSENGINEERING.COM FILE DATE: 6/22/18 I SHEET: 1 PL20170004419/CP-2018-1;PL20170004385 Allura PUD(PUDR);Alternate Language Page 6 of 10 EXHIBIT D ALLURA RPUD LEGAL DESCRPTION PARCEL 1 - OR 3876 PG 1542 THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA ALSO KNOWN AS LOT 11 IN UNRECORDED BRYAN ACRES SUBDIVISION. PARCELS 2 - OR 3876 PG 1546 THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 48, SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS THE WESTERLY 15 FEET THEREOF, AND THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 (SW 1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 (NW 1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 (NW 1/4) OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 (NE 1/4) OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 48, SOUTH, RANGE 25, EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. PARCEL 3 - OR 4744 PG 3049 THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (NE 1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW 1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW 1/4) OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (NE 1/4) SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS THE WEST THIRTY (30) FEET THEREOF RESERVED FOR ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY PURPOSES, SHOWN AS TRACT#2 OF UNRECORDED PLAT OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER. PARCEL 4 - OR 3675 PG 1026 THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER (NW1/4) OF THE NORTHEAST ONE-QUARTER (NE1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER (NW1/4) OF THE NORTHEAST ONEQUARTER (NE1/4) OF SECTION, 13, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. PARCEL 5 - OR 4908 PG 204 THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER; AND THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER, OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER, SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. PARCELS 6 - 11 - OR 4596 PG 980 PARCEL 1: THE WEST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF PL20170004419/CP-2018-1;PL20170004385 Altura PUD(PUDR);Alternate Language Page 7 of 10 PL20170004419/0P-2018-1; P120170004385 Allura PUD (PUDR) Alternate Language CGMP Alternate Language: Livingston Road/Veterans Memorial Boulevard East Residential Subdistrict Option 1: Deny the proposed amendment based upon a lack of relevant data and analysis, failure of the applicant to prove the necessity for the amendment, and a creation of internal inconsistencies within the CGMP if the amendment were to be adopted. Option 2: The Livingston Road/Veterans Memorial Boulevard East Residential Subdistrict consists of±35.57 acres and is located in the southeast quadrant of the intersection of Livingston Road and Veterans Memorial Boulevard and is within a Transportation Concurrency Management Area (TCMA). The purpose of this Subdistrict is to allow for a multi-family development at a density of up to 12 9.81 4 units per acre and to fulfill the intent of the TCMA, as stated in FLUE Policy 6.1. Development in this Subdistrict shall be subject to the following: a. The Subdistrict site shall be rezoned to Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD). b. Allowable uses are limited to multi-family rental dwellings and shall not exceed 120 350142 units, or not more than 4 units per gross acre. c. The RPUD shall demonstrate consistency with FLUE Policy 6.5 6.3 by providing two or more of the following: i. A transit shelter within the RPUD in a location and design approved by Collier County Public Transit & Neighborhood Enhancement (PINE) Division; ii. Bicycle and pedestrian facilities, with connection to the abutting commercial property to the west; and, iii. Vehicular interconnection to the abutting commercial property to the west. PL20170004419/CP-2018-1;PL20170004385 Allura PUD(PUDR);Alternate Language Page 1 of 10 Certificates of occupancy shall not be approved for more than X49107 multi-family units (a density of 7.0 3.0 units per acre) until the applicable facilities and/or interconnections, as described above and approved as Development Commitments in the RPUD, have been completed. d. The RPUD shall include development standards and buffers to insure compatibility with surrounding land uses. PL20170004419/CP-2018-1;PL20170004385 Allure PUD(PUDR);Alternate Language Page 2 of 10 RPUD Alternate Language: ALLURA RPUD LIST OF PERMITTED USES PERMITTED USES: TRACT R — RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILY: 1. Principal Uses A. A maximum of '120 142 multi-family dwelling units (11.98 4.0 units per acre). 2. Accessory Uses A. Customary accessory uses and structures to residential units, including carports, garages, utility and maintenance buildings, hand carwash area, and garbage and recycling receptacles. B. Community clubhouse, indoor and outdoor recreational uses and facilities such as swimming pools, tennis courts, pickle ball courts, bocce ball courts, volleyball courts, walking paths, picnic areas, dog parks, playgrounds, fitness centers, and community administration. These uses shall be permitted throughout the R designated areas of the PUD. C. Temporary sales trailers and model units, subject to LDC Section 5.04.05, as applicable. D. Entry gates and gatehouses. E. Stormwater management treatment facilities, conveyance facilities, and structures, such as berms, swales, and outfall structures. F. Parking structures, not to exceed 45. 25 feet in actual height. TRACT P — PRESERVE: 1. Principal Uses A. Preservation of native habitat. 2. Accessory Uses A. Uses identified in and subject to the requirements and conditions set forth in LDC Section 3.05.07.H.1.h., Allowable uses within County required preserves. PL20170004419/CP-2018-1;PL20170004385 Altura PUD(PDDR);Alternate Language Page 3 of 10 THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. PARCEL 2: THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. PARCEL 3: THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. PARCEL 4: THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. PARCEL 5: THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. PARCEL 6: THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. PARCEL 12 - OR 4865 PG 2180 THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. PL20170004419/CP-2018-1.PL20170004385 Altura PUD(PUDR);Alternate Language Page 8 of 10 EXHIBIT E ALLURA RPUD DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS 1. Planning A. One entity (hereinafter the Managing Entity) shall be responsible for PUD monitoring until close-out of the PUD, and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUD commitments until close-out of the RPUD. At the time of this PUD approval, the Managing Entity is SD Livingston, LLC. Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity, then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document, to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. After such approval, the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts, the Managing Entity shall provide written notice to County that includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required by the RPUD by the new owner and the new owner's agreement to comply with the Commitments through the Managing Entity, but the Managing Entity will not be relieved of its responsibility under this Section. When the RPUD is closed out, then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment of PUD commitments. B. Issuance of a development permit by a county does not in any way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law. C. All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before commencement of the development. 2. ENVIRONMENTAL A. The Allura RPUD shall preserve a minimum of 8.37 acres on-site (25% of 33.49± acres of existing native vegetation). B. The Developer shall adhere to the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation PL20170004419/CP-2018-1•PL20170004385 Allura PUD(PUDR);Alternate Language Page 9 of 10 Commission Black Bear Management Plan, as applicable. The informational brochure created by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWCC) and titled "A Guide to Living in Bear County" will be distributed to future homeowners and construction/maintenance personnel. Residents will be provided with information on how to secure their garbage containers to discourage bears from foraging in trash receptacles and the project will utilize bear-proof dumpsters in locations to be determined at the time of Site Development Plan (SDP) approval. 3. TRANSPORTATION A. Intensity of uses under any development scenario for the PUD is limited to the two-way, unadjusted, average weekday, pm peak hour trip entering/exiting generation of 176 62 total trips utilized in the TIS dated February 6, 2018 as calculated for the reduced number of dwelling units (142), or as may be increased or decreased based on the use codes in the ITE Manual on trip generation rates in effect at the time of application for SDP/SDPA or subdivision plat approval. B. The Developer shall make a payment to Collier County for the development's proportional share of the cost of signalization of the intersection of Livingston Road and Veterans Memorial Boulevard in the amount of$17,19/1.72 $5,813.45 (based upon 142 dwelling units). This payment shall be made prior to approval of the first Site Development Plan (SDP) or subdivision plat for this PUD, whichever occurs first. C. A transit shelter shall be proved by the Developer in a location and design approved by Collier County Public Transit & Neighborhood Enhancement (PTNE) Department. The shelter shall be installed prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for residential use or by a later time certain if acceptable to PTNE Department. PL20170004419/CP-2018-1;PL20170004385 Allura PUD(PUDR);Alternate Language Page 10 of 10 GoodnerAngela From: Doug Cousins <rdoug.cousins@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2019 1:28 PM To: FialaDonna; SolisAndy; SaundersBurt; TaylorPenny; McDanielBill Cc: Susan Mulgrew; Katy Wrede; 'Ivan L. Rosenblatt'; 'Mr. Victor Cintron'; 'Advanced Property'; 'Rick Tessmer'; StrainMark Subject: Allura Development by Stock at the southeast corner of Livingston &Veterans Memorial Blvd Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed To The Board of Collier County Commissioners: RE: Stock request to increase density for their Allura Development at the Southeast corner of Livingston & Veterans Memorial Blvd I understand on September 24th you will be voting on a Stock request to increase the density of their Allura development at the southeast corner of Livingston & Veterans Memorial Blvd. On August 1sY the Collier County Planning Commission sent you a NO recommendation in regards to the Stock proposal for increasing density. Based on the Planning Commission's NO recommendation I implore you to also vote a resounding NO to this request. I attended the Planning Commission sessions on this topic and Stock did not provide any evidence or articulate the benefits to the community for an increase in density beyond what is already zoned for this parcel of land. In fact there was unanimous vocal opposition to this request from the surrounding communities for the following main reasons: 1. Increased Congestion Already Immokalee Rd, Livingston Rd and Veterans Memorial Blvd have intolerable traffic congestion during in-season peak periods. Traffic is routinely stop and go on Livingston Rd during in-season peak periods and Immokalee is continuously congested. As well, Livingston is used as a by-pass route when I 75 is congested. To make matters worse the following population increases are already in plan for this area: - New Enclave community on Livingston Rd, which just started construction - Talis Park, Mediterra and Barrington Cove are still building and selling units - New School to be built on Veterans Memorial Blvd in the next two years Therefore increasing the density for Allura would only exacerbate the already intolerable traffic congestion problem and increase the strain on existing community facilities in the area!! 2. Not Compatible The surrounding communities are a majority of single family residences and there is a valid concern that introducing multi-story rental units would lower the surrounding property values for the following reasons: - The apartment architecture is not compatible with the neighbouring communities and the requested increase in density will require multiple 3 to 4 story buildings. As well, these apartment units would abut the backyards of single family residents, which would be a clear intrusion of their privacy. - The proposed apartment complex will have no standards or controls such as the surrounding developments, which have control of the operation, maintenance and behaviour of the owners by a Board of Directors - Although Stock is a reputable developer in all likelihood they will eventually sell the property to an investor since running apartments is not their core business. There would be no control over the investor who could just maximize income by foregoing upkeep and maintenance. All of the surrounding property has been developed in compliance with current zoning bylaws. The residents who purchased in the surrounding neighbourhoods did so relying on the fact that neighbouring projects would be of like kind. I realize that the existing Della Rosa PUD allows for multi- family dwellings but you should not compound what I consider was an erroneous decision in 2007 with increasing the density for the Allura Development. 3. No Need As reported at the Planning Commission hearings by the Collier County Planning department the County is already well served with the existing inventory of"Luxury" rental apartment units. The vacancy rate for this category is healthy and increasing the density to allow additional units will not fix a problem that does not exist!! Since there is no need for additional "Luxury" rental apartments I am assuming the County Commissioners are considering the Stock proposal to increase the density as a way to increase revenue for the county. However, I believe introducing high density rental units in an area of single family homes will ultimately lead to a decrease in the surrounding property values resulting overall in less tax revenue not more. In summary and for the reasons articulated above I urge you to please vote against the request from Stock to increase the density. You are elected as representatives for your constituents and your constituents strongly oppose the Stock request to increase the density beyond what is already zoned for this parcel of land. Sincerely, R Doug Cousins A Strand Community Owner GoodnerAngela From: Rick Spreng <rickspreng@outlook.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2019 10:01 PM To: SolisAndy Subject: Allura Project Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed Commissioner Solis, I am writing to you as a concerned citizen in your district. Please agree with the planning commission who wisely voted not to approve the Allura Project. This the proper time for you and your fellow commissioners to affirm the Collier Count Growth Management Plan and support the citizens that live in you district rather than a developers financial interest. Although I would agree reasonable housing is a concern for our county, it should not come at the expense of poor planning, causing very difficult quality of life issues for neighbors to the project. Management Planning is to preserve quality of life for us all. I find it interesting that Arthrex has at a very late date requested the commissioners to support this project. Might it be that their attorney also represents Stock Development? Rick Spreng GoodnerAngela From: patrick mccartney <reloretta@icloud.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 4, 2019 9:29 AM To: SolisAndy Subject: Allura RPUD Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed Your mission statement says you are committed to ensuring the responsible management of the growth in Collier County, if this is truly something you believe in then VOTE NO on September 24th Sent from my iPad GoodnerAngela From: stephen dorazio <sdorazio2117@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2019 4:19 PM To: SolisAndy Subject: Allura Proposal I live in The Strand Community in North Naples. Please DO NOT approve the Stock proposal for the Allura apartment complex on Livingston and Veterans Memorial Parkway. This apartment complex does not belong in our neighborhood. Thank you. Stephen D'Orazio GoodnerAngela From: Amy Markley <amymarkley56@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, August 7, 2019 2:43 PM To: FialaDonna; SolisAndy; SaundersBurt; McDanielBill; Penny.Taylor@colliercounty.gov; katywrede@gmail.com; Alex. Markley Subject: Allura Apts I'm writing this to express my grave concern over the Allura Project. I and my entire community, at The Strand, of 1100 households, strongly recommend that you give a resounding NO vote to this project. I have been a full-time resident of over 8 yrs. and have Never heard such angry people. We are going to be watching very carefully and we be at the September meeting. If you don't support us in this important endeavor, we will be looking for people that will support us in the future. Amy Markley 352-502-2445 Sent from my iPad GoodnerAngela From: Cynthia Roland <cynthiarolandslah@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, August 7, 2019 7:54 AM To: SolisAndy Subject: Re: RE: Dear Andy, Thank u do much for the follow up and information provided in regards to our NO vote request ! We appreciate knowing u cared enough to respond!! We will keep following this project of course!! Again -thanks for being there Cynthia Roland The Strand Sent from my iPhone On Aug 6, 2019, at 4:42 PM, SolisAndy<Andy.Solis@colliercountyfl.gov>wrote: Hello, Ms. Roland: Thank you for sharing your thoughts on the proposed Allura project. We know that it takes time and effort to be an active member of the community; your willingness to be involved is appreciated. While the volume of emails received at the District 2 office is too great for Commissioner Solis to reply individually, he reviews each one and may reach out to you to gather more information if it seems appropriate. Know that even if he does not contact you again, your voice has been heard. In case you weren't aware,the adoption hearings for the Growth Management Plan Amendment and the companion PUD amendment for Allura are currently scheduled for the following dates: September 24, 2019—Board of County Commissioners This meeting will be held at the government complex at 3299 Tamiami Trail East-- marked 'County Admin' on this map-- beginning at 9am. You are invited to attend, or you can watch it live online, or on local cable channel 97. Shortly following the meeting,the video will be available to watch on demand. Thanks again for taking the time to be an engaged citizen; it is so important to the process. Please feel free to call or email whenever we can be of assistance. Sent on behalf of Commissioner Solis by Angela Goodner, Executive Coordinator Andy Solis, Esq., District 2 Commissioner Collier County Board of County Commissioners Phone: 239.252.8602 Fax: 239.252.6947 Sign up for the District 2 newsletter HERE! Under Florida Law,e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone at 239-252-8602 or in writing at 3299 Tamiami Trail E,Suite 303, Naples, FL 34112. Original Message From: Cynthia Roland <cynthiarolandslah@gmail.com> Sent: Saturday,August 3, 2019 1:10 PM To:SolisAndy<Andy.Solis@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Nobto Allure appts please-we r residents of The Strand Thank u Sent from my iPhone GoodnerAngela From: Cynthia Roland <cynthiarolandslah@gmail.com> Sent: Saturday, August 3, 2019 1:10 PM To: SolisAndy Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed Nobto Allure appts please-we r residents of The Strand Thank u Sent from my iPhone GoodnerAngela From: charlie hirschfeld <hirschfeldcharlie@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, August 2, 2019 3:18 PM To: GoodnerAngela Subject: apartment project Hi Angela, I just learned that the planning commision voted 3-2 against the proposed apartement project on Livingston Road next to Mediterra. I hope that Commissioner Solis will vote against the project at the County Commissioners meeting since this traffic issue is in his District 2. With all of the traffic on Livngston Road and with Seed to Table opening up in November which will cause even more traffic on Livingston Road it will be a bigger nightmare.That nice freindly road is now an unfriendly road. Hope all is well Regards Charlie Hirschfeld GoodnerAngela From: Cathy Miranti <cathymiranti@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, August 1, 2019 4:18 PM To: SolisAndy Subject: Re: Allura apts Della Rosa is not Allura. Let them build Della Rosa. Prevent Allura Cathy Miranti On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 11:54 AM SolisAndy<Andy.Solis@colliercountyfl.gov>wrote: Hello, Ms. Miranti: Thank you for sharing your thoughts on the proposed Allura project. We know that it takes time and effort to be an active member of the community; your willingness to be involved is appreciated. If you were not able to attend or watch any of the earlier hearings at which this project was discussed, you can see the March Board of County Commissioners (BCC) discussion HERE<http://collier.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view id=4&clip id=2619&meta id=120097>. Watching this discussion can provide important information to those who aren't yet aware that about half the land included in the Allura proposal is already zoned for 4-story apartments, and has been since 2007, in a PUD called Della Rosa. Although it comes as a surprise to many neighbors, apartments were planned there before most of the surrounding developments were built. Allura is proposed as an alternative to that earlier PUD by the new property owner, but the Della Rosa apartments were approved by prior County Commissioners and nothing can be done now to prevent them from being built. In case you weren't aware, the adoption hearings for the Growth Management Plan Amendment and the companion PUD amendment for Allura are currently scheduled for the following dates: August 1, 2019- Planning Commission September 24, 2019 - Board of County Commissioners These meetings will be held at the government complex at 3299 Tamiami Trail East-- marked 'County Admin' on this map<https://www.colliercountyfl.gov/Home/ShowDocument?id=8041>-- beginning at 9am. You are invited to attend, or you can watch it live online<https://www.colliercountyfl.gov/Home/ShowDocument?id=8041>, or on local cable channel 97. Shortly following the meeting, the video will be available to watch on demand<https://www.colliercountyfl.gov/your-government/divisions-a-e/communication-customer-relations- division/meeting-video-archive>. Thanks again for taking the time to be an engaged citizen; it is so important to the process. Please feel free to call or email whenever we can be of assistance. Sent by Executive Coordinator Angela Goodner on behalf of Andy Solis, Esq. Commissioner, District 2 Collier County Board of Commissioners 239.252.8602 Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone at 239.252.8602 or in writing at 3299 Tamiami Trail E,Suite 303, Naples, FL 34112. From: Cathy Miranti<cathymiranti@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday,July 31, 2019 6:46 PM To: SolisAndy Subject: Allura apts Please do not allow these Apts to be built.The traffic is unbearable and it will make the situation unsafe. CathyMiranti 4902 ParadiseCircle Naples, FL GoodnerAngela From: Rob Conforti <conforob@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, August 1, 2019 1:56 PM To: StrainMark; FryerEdwin; KarlFry; pdearborn@johnrwood.com; HomiakKaren; ChrzanowskiStan Cc: SolisAndy; FialaDonna;TaylorPenny; SaundersBurt; McDanielBill Subject: Allura Dear Commissioners, I was at at the meeting this morning but was unable to stay past the lunch break to speak about the issue being considered. I have some concerns that I don't feel are being addressed by the presentations of the Stock team nor the staff recommendations. I'll be brief: The hypothetical formulas used for traffic studies appear to be flawed in that they assume "normal"traffic patterns and flow. Please keep in mind that as of now,Veterans Memorial is dead ended going both east and west. I understand it will extend in the future to the west to Old 41. In any case,typical traffic from the intersection of Livingston and Veterans Memorial will be going either north or south. There are no options to "divert" when traffic is blocked. In edition,the scenarios did not take into account new construction in Tallis Park,The Enclave (north of Veteran's),the proposed high school and Oaks Farm. Even without this development,travel time from Veteran's Memorial to Bonita Beach road is at least 30 minutes in peak traffic times. Adding the number of vehicles discussed today would significantly increase this congestion. This is based on fact. I've timed it several times. It is not based on formulaic projections (consultant) nor observation from a control room (Staff member). Their hired consultant is paid to provide an answer that benefits the applicant, not Collier County nor the surrounding neighborhoods. In addition to this congestion, it was noted today that links east and west of 175 on Immokalee Rd are over capacity. Considering that traffic from this development must go north or south,we can reasonably expect those links to be even more stressed. Comparing this development to other similar developments is not a valid comparison. They referenced Pine Ridge and 41 as an area able to take the increased density. That is a totally different area with completely different traffic flow,therefor not a valid comparison. It is also important to note Livingston Rd reduces from 3 to 2 lanes north of Veteran's Memorial. There is no control over Lee County traffic and roadway expansion. In addition,the discussion of future Collier Area Transit service is of no help. Collier Country ends less than one mile north of Veteran's Memorial. There is no county public transit relief going north from this location. On a different note,there are thousands of homes/families in the is area. Buyers of those homes researched the areas prior to purchase. Zoning was set at that time. Now there is a proposal to change zoning after the existing neighborhoods were sold. Stock bought this property with the current zoning. It is unreasonable for the existing families to adjust when they did their research. Stock knew what they were buying. They should not get special treatment. In their presentation,Stock representatives described the typical renter of these "luxury" apartments but then seem to insulate the benefit of offering lower income options to accommodate area employers. They can't have it both ways. The fact is,they see an opportunity and a market for these apartments no matter the impact to the surrounding neighborhoods. Thanks for your time and effort in this matter. I urge to to deny the applicant's request. Sincerely, Rob Conforti, SPHR, HCS President/CEO 312.909.8664 conforob@gmail.com leadershiplaunchconsulting.com GoodnerAngela From: Cathy Miranti <cathymiranti@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday,July 31, 2019 6:47 PM To: SolisAndy Subject: Allura apts Please do not allow these Apts to be built.The traffic is unbearable and it will make the situation unsafe. CathyMiranti 4902 ParadiseCircle Naples, FL GoodnerAngeia From: Harriet Spirer <ehspirer@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2019 11:03 AM To: SolisAndy Subject: Allure Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed Please don't ruin our neighborhood. Who does Stock development have in their pockets.That corner was not supposed to be apartments.Just some houses. I think it has been made perfectly clear that the developments around Veterans Memorial Drive and that part of Livingston are against that kind of buildings Sent from my iPhone GoodnerAngela From: Patti Coffin <patticoffin@comcast.net> Sent: Monday, July 29, 2019 8:57 AM To: SolisAndy Subject: Re: Allure Just because a prior judgement was made unsoundly does not make this right. If anything the communities developed since should have significant bearing on the new proposal. Two wrongs as they say. Sent from Patti's iPhone7 On Jul 29, 2019, at 8:34 AM, SolisAndy<Andy.Solis@colliercountyfl.gov>wrote: Hello, Ms. Coffin: Thank you for sharing your thoughts on the proposed Allura project. We know that it takes time and effort to be an active member of the community; your willingness to be involved is appreciated. While the volume of emails received at the District 2 office is too great for Commissioner Solis to reply individually, he reviews each one and may reach out to you to gather more information if it seems appropriate. Know that even if he does not contact you again, your voice has been heard. If you were not able to attend or watch any of the earlier hearings at which this project was discussed, you can see the March Board of County Commissioners (BCC) discussion HERE. Watching this discussion can provide helpful information to those who aren't yet aware that about half the land included in the Allura proposal is already zoned for 4-story apartments, and has been since 2007, in a PUD called Della Rosa. Although it comes as a surprise to many neighbors, apartments were planned there before most of the surrounding homes were built. Allura is proposed as an alternative to that earlier PUD by the new property owner, but the Della Rosa apartments were approved by prior County Commissioners and nothing can be done now to prevent them from being built. You may have heard that the hearing before the Planning Commission was continued last week. In case you weren't aware, the adoption hearings for the Growth Management Plan Amendment and the companion PUD amendment for Allura are currently scheduled for the following dates: August 1, 2019—Planning Commission September 24, 2019—Board of County Commissioners These meetings will be held at the government complex at 3299 Tamiami Trail East-- marked 'County Admin' on this map -- beginning at 9am. You are invited to attend, or you can watch it live online, or on local cable channel 97. Shortly following the meeting,the video will be available to watch on demand. Thanks again for taking the time to be an engaged citizen; it is so important to the process. Please feel free to call or email whenever we can be of assistance. Sent on behalf of Commissioner Solis by Angela Goodner, Executive Coordinator Andy Solis, Esq., District 2 Commissioner Collier County Board of County Commissioners Phone: 239.252.8602 Fax: 239.252.6947 Sign up for the District 2 newsletter HERE! Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone at 239-252-8602 or in writing at 3299 Tamiami Trail E,Suite 303, Naples, FL 34112. Original Message From: Patti Coffin <patticoffin@comcast.net> Sent: Saturday,July 27, 2019 12:39 PM To: SolisAndy<Andy.Solis@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Allure This is wrong on so many levels!!! ADDED TRAFFIC CONGESTION, SCHOOL OVER CROWDING, INTRODUCING TRANSIENTS WITH NO PRIDE OF OWNERSHIP TO AN UPSCALE GATED COMMUNITY, INCREASE DRAG ON UTILITIES (MAINLY WATER), and did I mention TRAFFIC!!!!I I And, of no small importance, decreasing the value of every neighboring community. These are exactly the kind of places drug sellers and pedophiles look for. "luxury" apartments my backside, these are very small apartments, that will increase the traffic, in most cases by two cars per unit. Those of us in Mediterra and neighboring communities live the nightmare of trying to go in and out of our gates during morning and evening rush hours already!!!! Please make a sensible decision on behalf of the people who afford you your office. We do not want this project! It should be single family dwellings, period!!!! Thank you Sent from Patti's iPhone7 GoodnerAngela From: Eddie DePuye <depuye7@gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, July 28, 2019 10:30 AM To: StrainMark; FryerEdwin; KarlFry; pdearborn@johnrwood.com; HomiakKaren; ChrzanowskiStan; SolisAndy; FialaDonna; TaylorPenny; SaundersBurt; McDanielBill Subject: Allura Apartments Project Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed Dear Sir/Madam, In regards to the housing project of Allura Apartments: "This is wrong on so many levels!!! ADDED TRAFFIC CONGESTION, SCHOOL OVER CROWDING, INTRODUCING TRANSIENTS WITH NO PRIDE OF OWNERSHIP TO AN UPSCALE GATED COMMUNITY, INCREASE DRAG ON UTILITIES (MAINLY WATER), and did I mention TRAFFICIIIIII And, of no small importance, decreasing the value of every neighboring community. These are exactly the kind of places drug sellers and pedophiles look for. "luxury" apartments my backside, these are very small apartments, that will increase the traffic, in most cases by two cars per unit. Those of us in Four Seasons and neighboring communities live the nightmare of trying to go in and out of our subdivisions during morning and evening rush hours already!!!! Please make a sensible decision on behalf of the people who afford you your office. We do not want this project! It should be single family dwellings, period!!!! Thank you Respectfully Eddie DePuye Sent from my iPhone GoodnerAngela From: Patti Coffin <patticoffin@comcast.net> Sent: Saturday, July 27, 2019 12:39 PM To: SolisAndy Subject: Allure Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed This is wrong on so many levels!!! ADDED TRAFFIC CONGESTION, SCHOOL OVER CROWDING, INTRODUCING TRANSIENTS WITH NO PRIDE OF OWNERSHIP TO AN UPSCALE GATED COMMUNITY, INCREASE DRAG ON UTILITIES (MAINLY WATER), and did I mention TRAFFICIIII I And, of no small importance, decreasing the value of every neighboring community. These are exactly the kind of places drug sellers and pedophiles look for. "luxury" apartments my backside,these are very small apartments, that will increase the traffic, in most cases by two cars per unit. Those of us in Mediterra and neighboring communities live the nightmare of trying to go in and out of our gates during morning and evening rush hours already!!!! Please make a sensible decision on behalf of the people who afford you your office. We do not want this project! It should be single family dwellings, period!!!! Thank you Sent from Patti's iPhone7 GoodnerAngela From: Tim Diegel <timdiegel@mac.com> Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2019 10:14 AM To: SolisAndy Subject: Reminder of a few points re:Allura Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed Dear Commissioner Solis, I wish to list a few points to review before the upcoming vote on Allura. 1. As you know the Planning Commission voted against the project based on the lack of need and especially the incompatibility of such a behemoth structure in the 4 mile neighborhood between Immokalee Road and Bonita Beach Road which is exclusively developments of houses. 2.The Quality of Life will be forever changed for these residents who purchased in this area. The increase in the traffic on already"maxed-out " roads is a concern of all living in the developments in this region.The extension plan to the West for Veterans can even ADD to the traffic in this area.This plan has not been studied in detail. Stock Development did not give any supporting traffic analysis evidence to the Planning Commission's requests and questions as documented in the minutes of the first two County Commissioner's meetings.There will be an increase in the two left turn lanes at the intersection being discussed. The left turn procedure is the cause of auto crashes between 30%-50% in the US (depending on the studies). This data is readily available in an online search. The risk is even higher in these Florida communities due to poorer "long sight perception" of the elderly. The other factors regarding quality of life are obvious: NOISE POLLUTION from the traffic, cars/motorcycles on the roads and in the adjacent parking lots to Barrington Cove, etc. AIR POLLUTION from the traffic increase should be a concern to protect the residents. Recent studies are finding that particulate matter in the auto exhaust can cause damage to the lungs especially in children.This is a definite concern due to the proximity of the 3 nearby schools and the new high school planned. LIGHT POLLUTION will also be a factor due the the height (3 stories) and the close proximity of the back of the houses of Barrington Cove.The bedrooms in the back of the homes will face the high - probably LED lights-shining down onto the owner's windows.This type of light can affect sleep unless black-out curtains are purchased. The quality and quantity of sleep has now been found to affect the immune system and overall longevity. (Reading "Why WE Sleep by Dr. Matthew Walker would be worthwhile for your personal health -Amazon $14) 3.The Need for more apartments is controversial. Last Spring in the discussions, it was mentioned that 4000 apartments in the area of Collier County are in various stages of development. We don't need more in this area. In a few informal discussions with Arthrex employees,they mentioned that affordable houses are what is needed for the higher paid employees. These employees are successful and intelligent and don't want to be paying$2000+for an apartment. They want a house with a mortgage. There also has been no mention of the new apartments within 3-4 miles of the proposed Allura project in Lee County. You are probably aware of the 250 or so new apartments in Downtown Bonita Springs and the another close development on Bonita Beach Road near the Waffle House. The Planning Commission did not feel that Collier County had a NEED for these Allura apartments. Stock Development could easily put in houses to which few residents would object. These houses would be compatible in the area, affect traffic less, would start to fill the need for reasonable (?) houses in the area and would have a minimal negative effect on the quality of life. Stock would probably have to settle on less profit. It seems obvious to vote against the Allura proposal. The residents within the 4 mile neighborhood vehemently oppose it as did the planning commission. We can't understand why any commissioner would give a positive vote.Thanks for your consideration. Tim Diegel MD, 16229 Aberdeen Avenue, Naples 34110. timdiegel@mac.com GoodnerAngela From: jody moody <smithmoody@comcast.net> Sent: Sunday, September 8, 2019 3:54 PM To: FialaDonna Cc: SolisAndy; SaundersBurt;TaylorPenny; McDanielBill Subject: Re-zoning of the Allura Apartment Project Dear Commissioners, We have been residents of Naples for over 13 years.We live here full-time and are both employed in Collier County. Our residence is on Fairway Court in The Strand community. Our concern is the upcoming final vote on the re- zoning of the Allura Apartment Project.Since purchasing our home in 2001, we have seen many new housing developments in our area, all of which seem to fit in with the local communities. We are vehemently opposed to the Allura project for many reasons. Our back gate accesses Veteran's Memorial Blvd. and is shared by residents of The Strand,Talis Park and Barrington Cove.The traffic congestion at the intersection with Livingston is already severe during rush hours, even in off-season. High density apartments also accessing this road would make it substantially worse. In addition,this apartment project is not in line with the Collier County Development Plan, and would not fit in with any of the local communities in this area. We strongly support the Planning Commission's recent decision to vote against the re-zoning for the Allura project. We urge you to please do the same! Respectfully, Chris and Jo Ann Moody Sent from Mail for Windows 10 Commissioner Andy Solis, Esq. Scanned Records Cover Sheet Date Material Received: DO /1 Received From: i Cill ( ClYO`t/CInW 13V an Six_k / Description: ii: > L. 0 < OPot ,� o em"-"` UQ r+ �..� 040 70 CU ri- zooz C d5 iii 7 0 $1. '7' Cu 0 o ►-d oo (D E1--L tt) m 5 re b � Cl. rD � C. CD 0 -1 D Cu in. rD rrt 04 r-+ cil cp CU (!) filir C Cr 3 a 0 Nammll• rot co .r• n 1 . t 14 r, 1 u.;<ta0 4 r - , ..., •NI *711)1k.‘` - f[3 e s •l , ek y -1-!..1., rill. r,.„ .-\„ l i« i �i • l,1 Lkktkkllt �� # I LI ;oya�geServe1C +/ I $ i(� �' -. / .- Ir td '4'..! t iSPilPi‘''''''''''-'.---!' ..,:,,,,,,,-. ''''',0' C) Alla ', , •• 4O4 i - < r -," i ., r 'lo .i i lij:1„.10,1110.-.....-1•0'1.1„ 0 ,, jAviniAton EM i 1 .. rz � " t F cr, k .. Y s b Li- <i. `l iwrilk. .v. 4t I.'.I.!FL AMC ''''4 .a lit I ., ,.S, t 3 Zi f \ \ ti { Cly jt VV 0 s' p 1 ,a. Tf tI'll =f MML'41;40, ;t tea. t 4` 1� 1.G , .—; v , `, F''' ti Fly " t s iI• 0 /N r © cn O T r 1 11 c 11 7.7 7. O CO t3 PI -I 17 q ' ?:1. • FiME Llwif �� cn i . II1IIF 'I!E T g 5 c.11 0n {1 �YG 8 1 p pC - 5 40 1 i � p F 1 b r I A n c NM Q PION 7 i p e5p gc D A . Willi •F i 's 2' o =" o A .. B KO ° ,,a L .,.al=1=4(11 fr`` . i • — F 13 • .JL d — L• 4,7___. s C d m .� a m N ��.;..r��, Y '�` N C S m W .moi G 1`r"' c c C n • 5 m > > o N c A O il �� sky' 7^ ,gyp m a m' v x 0 a : ; T-- ,.u, _ a s 'C 2 CO a g.' O. 1 1Uj 71 • 1 m n D s a s ! C-- C Cp z O n C 0 C I SI O W O 3 1,2 Fa d a , 5 0, p m N F ‹. a g v o • a cm o < ! > m o W Y m LI > i u L TA-, �' z Uo C 0m r co 3 V m z 3 3 d N N C- V) ((n -— Q fp N - . rm < cXI O w C C. S n r 3 Z co W (n UI D 3-t N nmi p oril�z zm 0 't p) ere. N _z o D —I o I (c. o O _I m Kr, I m n z r N IN 1i f J l� A ` rnm 4 s ,_ yyy �� ,�r4 F ,u, . t ! I , a .,*- i. i X11 g ti (g 1. i g ,J UM.Mfp ACV WI ii .o g ' 5 ,t a€M Ob' ` D n a "' `0:.0.40 ...NC i .. F I i `y J.:' a • En r 1" r �� � i i s s a + s ..... - a. iiF . � q� a r � 0� •` as Tilil c i . a 1 fl0 ia _,..!-----1-,_,4-. i lisli. ''' 114 . J {I .1'- -(111' ,� .j.j,,. . 4, i= s ER . D �b �• ry( c 14'N411Y1 L �...... •�� -- ___ _________ K. 1,0 6•„ •..101.(.1*.•1¢, 0.nhhVrri•.f �� LL LL__ r a I. N V M CT n 0 -4 0 td trj11 bd00n5," pd ,-cjnefh_An &I n 00. no � c� o � P, 4 (1) r..3. '-"" ).-' cn. -- ra) csi It P'' ‘ (A - ai CL• 0 ' �• n. n H dna c �r0 g p n Oro P � pp cn y ��--� N ¢, N p �' `7 u CD CD ` -4 1---' © 5 : u'`arzl-i 0 E. P )-1-, (1), 5(2 :.IWW n N � �D � O. C cD CT' OI cn c" �d rp 4A m A N Sy �. IrZ d d pare O cLus n &I p 1-,.-0-, '4 0 0 t" -P ,nj P- c � R cn �. 5 t-. )-° n ►..d am o Cr4 C E-a til 0 cA O1-• in4 � CD" Cip d 7d C .) -•�..� 'I CD ;-� r.4. ,.d 0 P: © ,., l_d. ali cri.i. � 1-4- (DI: (( 1.-• 4. 5 5, � 1 � d tr:+ c.). - c.).) 0 ep 00 ad — 1 cii o_h c), ......_ r:14 CCCI 0 $1) 00 O nCA �. • n � � � N o P c O 0 .. c - N �. �� �� C CD n NI Cm ' I � CD ((D up O ,r. p 0V) r-+ E C q CM r+ �CA R° 01 0 1 AV12 3A0'SOa V1130 dam1d -- __J__ - 11 O I m:_ __mm._mm .m__ __ l....__ _._ _ _ _ 11 1 1 11 AIOV9 '‘`.—M)11_,Vlitralk14: ii I li :w L 1. r, --.n ., ,}kr•- n • _-) • . +.you'+^l+tvv.,-)-?gt,N+,rt•,,,Y +I -.I T -------,3' k, _... i. ., _ -- 4~r n r n -. !, O0 co C UPI -.—WelY1-.-..— r V!1 *. R soo,oammoI flo 0 al tiJL _: '. r0 9 n ��lMAo " 8 }' I III Wry'a'1yL0.WJd0@LIYItt YfS'tt1Y (--�� AO q 1 ri• •-i• tr ' ' "". ' " " ' ' ' ' " ' .4 n IL) m -, -, -, • .iir. i . ...,. ..,. -a -I —' r,T,rTr . a . , . . y n -- m m ? 41. RI o re MNV law 1' O ..,„7avmao Won WOW • r"1,",.7--,..-::'- "1,",.-r r' - to V' rr Gr- ,- tI z-I 01 x SI) �, d !-.,� - r n • m m �• tri r+ CD -r , w b cn N /1 (..j CD b oO - O PI) 1,1/ ....... p �, -• -, 3 N N N 'f Pi U` O O 3 n n x- O .*, rip 4 3 ate: C < [ F o 1 m 12. a c i h m e n m a. m vi r- „I D ? c K• . nm © O? m3 ,--g cr c 5. i o a. G Z m 1C 'U C xl 02 N U O.cfA _ N yn r/ m iii D- am i �a a E VG+ 9 m D 1-1 ti coL. eCL a w ry o nw' G 5 p, _ g' 2- f- ami N fp ro 1� m S g -+ 0 m 3 3 N. N 0 3 _ 7 - n X .. o y O 0. O' IInl m fl. _ _ _ Pp A � afp H o p v, o, u " m W Cr) �-1 vi N j m w o * 5 0 = ET a i' 4 O - N �' 3cn @ 4 3 el r" s m t1 m -I m rn o 3 N 171 6 V�7 n CI) c� 0. a Z o i C3� a p c' �, y ,w C 03 0) rfl N of Q. a• .. *'� Y+ 0 QCD p O q n ,ice C1 a - 1 s Cr Co 3 a iv, CM s ip m c fp 10 Fr.-- w pgj = p N C` 7 Q (1) -• rt) m ET CO SD toy,K - 5' - co n . 7 3 r _ 7. el go y atb '9 N co c CO C 0 N 'M A a jc y yr c a 0 to ,, •� o u 0D m a c n 'Q a n.pO 3 co a1 a a : € vs c " -0 O c0 Oa q [fl Q • s N mo NJ n 7 '4 m ro vcu 0 N A 4 1 I i a r� Simi z a A UAmor A�� j � x -1 N mQl�mnn m mii IA I Xj cR rgr4 12 O e Z q 7/14,4:0 z m A _ -- _q r m r - r- o A< m< o 0 is•_-- ZONED:ROW d ti p9m yg m 44 m __ . =KarorrawR3udf —.7.4. - -- : I ''ou > S Oc NT - -- 1 $ + DAma0 --- ,,,I,,,,,;,-,1,- 1/l//////� -- --- —_E-:+__ Z g Z A — _ — — A m N TT 92; _. VI N Z m Vg2 m' <A 4 m 1 me W Tom` T4 v 2 i CO D r it fp fil" ' ,qt, a o r r r r r 1 _ Z D I 9 9m 9 >8 t1 d,r pi t' tt �' E�rU7 1t k[ .rf6 �'{I I o�m c ( 3g iE mA S 1. al -g 1 : 1 0. i di t c'a p'E �• E 'i k` 1 ,- A 33 • I 01 • t 1'Tt ` t k F Y • t A> ' F O ,"-.142). g e -.1..z., t `i ! i M p y R i t i • E r I ` F z m I ti gc 4 m d p Z w N o s p Er kr ' ' pp Ir a 4 .OoW o mPSODRI D Z D A A Z 1A 00 ` T v Au„m_ vp �yZETA dim y o m IN n<z�Aa o di . .� \. J�mc) nmr Dm ' o pOpg 1A1nn .^gD iA 5--'1,� oDo 9 l~ A 1 S ND n Um VP - Z D G nrD-Z„ T lnD V w D 2 • N �A ZJ l m i!u v ' $ piza3 - " 9+ N 1 • c �mgn m !TAnmm A5Cm • m .0'0 02 o n ym u ZZG VS -,m4pO Am r!” Vi ' ,Z3 < csA= a . vmim p�mAxT• ^ N <t-O26pA SA$m O OZp3 nN �Zy D Niimm e 2 1 ;2 O1' Clm r-- 2k m m�s"N1° QSg m aZ Oy O S gbQY N m � m 81 tri , .11 .10- n 1- :Ii .. r-. m tai xi O M s. C 1- 1) i. nn 10 G= 2 vJ nn _ Ix1 t'LI I. p, f 12 sg �; 1A y 0 0.lo;. 4.41`=41 •1111r V V r 'lo np vJ �=;""" 1 r ommi.eu1'.0 -' cgo , l r' '• Irr r, ., u� v/ II— - '1,, # -;i' fi {t I LLL.../// i - ., il 'U'IIiRTtIi --7- ____L, si �a C 1 DD jI. j-- &TTTT.T8.77,741:411Larrffrirrarmrp ,I \ 11 1 , Ili! 1I U U 0 IN rte.. t'" r7a '1!O O ,'OO �" gioOO p ''OO 555 p t ono � • ..! to tv egg § .9ii9 Fi ti 0 0 '150 ' 01( Pu0J a 5. 3 1. gigi 0 0100606 giPpl !‘d-1, 1-1 00 .,0 g1 .4--" PE ,9"1 0 M ILO: 2i1" 6D I te?Lig LI. IE6t! P 'diX ‘11 irgiti p '- g° gP 9 ' P I. T5. 1w'rl s tg. .. 0,:; s.i .....:, 4 p h.. 4 .6.,; r d O H H P DD I . t .111 a 1 i i R 0 , , i ii o - ' $ 8 4U 8 U $ aAc $ o et rs uPi 0 8 ►rr M 'TOH H[[[***III u1R. O •ii 5r' 0;0 v) p v I I U qU y i. S "r,M 7 11 i\,//1 1 1 -It . It— " ' DI)) riper_or rs s s C 7 w- i rrrwe-.. r,. ' '"'PI. ir 1 O I Pr M . 0 } ' 1 s' s I i I 1 ',- _ i;. i I� �. I 'lo j • I __ I rl � - E � - — II ; - � � __ I — �., .mow .� . _ __ , , ,, ...___.... ____ , . L. - 1 ,I .. I -e -o -v m m m m m O w oo >: w co C r T C rc a 1 1 I 1 2. p D n-r 4 71 'V m D JSTC r � m rn ��6o m c 0o Z m ----�- r W T)iiiivy_ W N 11 ro S c>�a ' v O z `° m m o Nr% c p rmr �m ()D • v $rti n Nn 0 T co Z =A "" C rri xi oGm rrzc < *m ...., -'Z mH EiG OK fl c m Z n O n O Y $ i a �{3,.'.. to i i+� ��D"$t�r wY"Ys 1I 1 Fn 9- 3-S- ) Z /1 ' Alb*"., 44 r:Irn/------- N,!, � A op \i w m-0 -75 Z CO XI Ov 26 tam \ Z Viii! j° O Z \ (TO •III ra 4.-.1A pa �, v i' m H m v I toT M O C en rn70 4 Ai m I I o to Z Zrn lirt4 7 in (. ,. zp 1'a y 1711 Z 73 I m .. Q 1 Tr Ili' . A Itis IE tt� :,;..1 , ..1111{ a II '; ' III . yII • m .tit sj I ilt tz Ii.. 614 • t� ` 1 'C )e.%y it. • M. ( : 1 � -I ��1 ' ' w E �" � t `� {— ' ;, m .i t t :' z P 2D N S ; mpmp D µ03 maim A Pla 2 MI rfi—Ic OD a � "1 W nD (7T �m D i"A rn m Z 00 on + TM m T rn z c N 57 D �;� c B8 C) c� T ,I f yD rn `n rn T 5 m 17 0 W { Z t� t. D n i n ! rn ,4! o N j C l z -o QAT A CIT Z ti 0 / T Q 00 n :...4.1; 2 + 11 y o.O o,Z ., c OG) N Z m70 nit a]� D➢ ,� t� + xi i,„ 0 0* 2'Z mr nt c -r c y i f Z N T D / h v D Ty C 'a/ ,�.' © ! !1 . o -I0• , I: f C n I Eald'..;..i.l.:::,:..::::: ..._ lin A ��� f' D^^ c0 4+ k rn .T!0 4 ill i ' --r-n i,o.: ii.. , , • Y'.t rNL.,--,J, ^I _lin,. 4 T IiJy r s . 4 1 •vi co ii, IOC r CO. `'.' { j '"'rim—.�; X e o _ U A 1 D r r C mD Ky m m C co _ GI MiNg co cci, � T >Z a8 -<to mcmro -13r- 111 v r r rn O' 2 z CP q r. om < � 1 . z e S N a rn n r y OO O n N _ .' n oZ 03n0, O m -'O • z n 07 CO Ys�r C TQRI-, T rn C: omg:'',11: ': m �P n i • Dccn Drn ::. ' ' c nm Z AI 7I mi lOZ z ZDb S o o o i rn T 1 rn Mm ITI N -r RI F Z O z 0 P N 73 r.. 171 Z m Q' n0 n CO T DD O m x.r m cD a3 Z O "p Hi i •, a i ".t i _, t ; r ,.e,$` 6^ 4 7 a s O Oy ,.r ` b z c i O r co Crl Co g p> nr co Mit* n 9 %-� 1 01 _-_ __,- \ 1 _ _ IL] / D= -- '- \ .- I i ____ :- r— //1 U h . ,,,...__ , . x ;j . 1J, ' t .1 i 11,,1 „101 _ —. 0 Gf i m oz M Tz I-171 ."elmlw _ 411 m d .y i 0? f. Jr Iii I s g EPI u gL.n O 1 04 , 91 � O y a 1I 1 I 0 1:,_Ip t IDI ..1 t En yi ,. iir—R 1 i a �: 4 t 4 ", M6 R O TZ K '8 in t r*1 N P .4 q ., 1 , m t N 3 m [7 L.. iz^;4n� m 11 ~? 7. N m IA p 2 4 x 4 F 1" m , mo f m ci iF-.-'--', z 1 • • CD Cip QerC' a bd b '' p., = V s ra 1. E ilg: tp u0 5: 0 -W Ph ,:e tq r° W W g PO a ~ci) d yCIOL fro ti) R i ' ti S o ibil CO cA tti (-1- 4-‘ ti n' N• c4 w w t� N w N w w w w w r" CCD C1D CD •gyp. Q 0000 001 1/40 CLO 4 O 00 o Vs E. a tit CD CSD n W P CD(D Ci• l 111.> W w N N t•.) b.-6 r--a rr t-b rr �a Cfq O ui F+ ,••• W p 00 00 00 --J VI 1.-► ry CD P A) N tv tea o n a O° 0 -tea 0 w VI g °° CO CD 6.6rr I-. I-+ r I-• r-+ t..) w 5, UCr0 N? ps N ch VcT -.1 VI 1 d ►-"01 'D O\ "" No ® ifs 107 W — w N CT1.--. 'r ,. up 1-0 til CSD Cep 1- c. ,,\ \ CD CD ` ,c, 'X 1 j H H a ens" CD 0 c to 0. c t9 o � � ',' tfb 0 C') qc *6 c o ea �, U ea .. n ctA ix CA. Iv O t ( CT q C H Q 51 Q C CD ly p E Q• � 2.• v t.> I.., - Cs7 '_' �J a to go e b ET, �„ rnC i<r, pAl ni Cr ^:'t3 C A. < O w ; 0 a 0 Ft• N w I I] R C i � G .�•r v. W © = •et to W C _ C = tv I g. tv RI f i s▪' O i --,1 00 O' p .A. "e T. I op '° o e A �. d O . ' O x I...., °rv° cr g 1 H = D C ';=,'.' o C' g p ¢ i ‘e\ V' L rV 1\ R 1 I n , . n 0 E CDO 0 E C/) 0 pp W N r- Pg:"'C 0 - �° cip E 0 _+) 0 CD CD ►—! CDo C CD c 1 CD �- K) LA 0 W )-tC1g 90 - o - , o' '.4' 0 &" )-t 0-1 • -.t -• c..+ fml•I Cip E 0 CM ►� 0 CD r+ cl ?..t . rID CD O 0 P Cl) o CD c CD CD N O _ k cA4 cA � TJro -d � 5 > y o1 p, , CD CD 0--'• ) Q 8 a4 v, C kC �, r+ � CD `C � y� er � '-t• P O tl ri) (-4- ,o--"ti, Cip,_ . .... pot 0 (- Ca., @ 0 fa, (IQ 0-,• " IZI P rzE g o O g 0 ).---, CD f:::1- 1:_-•. 0 o t__ . )-(4- 0 t....,'"zi vol 0 rt up Vii im, 1ih )--• RI �• O CM? O P oho CD 7-_-.1. .\.::!k., iitt -c::::) pi., f ]o CCpp N D (DDD 0 r0 CD 0 gP M (4..) E 1:4 ' n Q C Ok ' cq, roo p0 o pp rt 0 o CD _z . _ .. . ....._ .. . . , . e '[. - , .., © , ..\ I , '...! ,... ... .„ . . . - -1,•,1.,':,',,-i-i1i,... ‘ .-,.. ,.., [) ..... , ( ...., :. . . ., .-;„;,......, , . , . . ... : 1 i 'IA 1t CF3 ' ,... . , .. ,, _ ' - ., ,,,,,,., „:„..„... .,.._ .., .. :,..,..., .-.1 '-E - -ir- -.2 g 1 I „ .. .... . ... . , . 40,0„............„,..,„ , . , . ., .,.. .. . .._, , ... . . ....., i . 1 90 ... .. . , . --4, - ,. . . \ 0/.....i,,...:. ' '''' " ! - ' '-47***:a6tb'S. - • ••,' if i • , , f.„ ; - [ ' • ,, •..„..;., , '",,,,, - ---- =1 71 , :::',••,' ... ‘ : ,. , . 1 i 1 • i'- ', \Y_) , ...„, 1 I • 1 i • '' -•. r - f : 1 }4 IL Qi) . . ...,.. Ii .... ll # . i r '11. '4*I a if . .. . I\D I\D .. . ......„ _____ . / -.- :::-..',W':-.:!:,-7--.. f O 1 1 Hol '.. aill _.. .,.......„ ....... .... ....,. . .. ,... .... ........„___,„ --f..._ ....._. ,„ ,,-,:::_eft_ .1 al k I _. ._ • ., _ Ot 4tIM 1 O _. ).:::.:: -,,,,-: T...,,;,:.-;-.. Q.. 0 ti .:. E11x1 O ;11( il . �� t r 4I II \C:. r .teL 0 di 11 - U r,Sk . -* ' -. .1‘.,i, :911:ft. 111 11 '11 t - . Q3, . IF _ V '11111. { may`... I C) ,01 al t N 1 1 i u © IV1Vb l .. L) AiTIF i:. , ';,}L .:'... © , rH CD x 3 . fil Q -/) I 90J ID II! C G ‘ iii'11 ,.' >11P1:0:1!,.",-. ' .: .. ,,..-, . . PCD 1 . N -P i t k r wJ O 1 a ... .„,.... .',z, t-- -.3j .. i Iv ‘ . . 1 w 1 , , i i ..... . .. ... . _, ...,.. ., ... A .. �. ali It O 1 o 1 o 1 1 Y Vi 1 10 i O V V i V 0— II Oa .,...iiii,;:::,...,•.;,f.X. ..',,,44-4481i.".• ;,-,1,:°; 1:" i ,1,,..;,,l,„,,.....,.._!<,4;4.,,,,; c>, ., • . ' ,141„1"A ida . ,...4, ,. . . .. .....' \i ' i- . ! .1.• . . ' .. _ ...... . ! . ,.. . , • , III 10.,..,, ..,..- ... ... ,.. ..-. ' . . .. - - - ..- : , . .. . V .... . 1 . . . . .. . t......m...4.------ - :.. :: :' V . , .', ,t , •...• >-.- -,,,‘ 7:O...-..,ye/t- 4141i . A 1, Ij . , ‘A...... , . °N'.\' , ; t`-1 • ' i — Ii ' •■t „,;'5 4..., ' ; .1. ' , '' ....... . .. . , ..,...,..._ '7' ,.. ,„ .........., -.1 III . ‘• ‘,.. . ., '. . . , ..., . . • , .. . . . ,. , ......: ..,_,,-.- . , ... . . . . ,,, ,--- , 1 "Ik','..' '•. .. i ..k..,4.k. ..:" , .... , 0 .., V ... ' ' J'4';.. .,•;. --, . . , ' ' • --r'• -,* ti- - y-,. • .- - ir : . 4 , . •,‘,$„-. ,,, . ' . -', 'e....1/ '. .- , ., . . .. # 1 ' ' ,, ' :i 111P74 * - .., ..., • - , . - .................. ......r.. I r r a i `f , l .' » + r4 c rr r �/� ED) l amu. • _ 'i.1I ' y'� I;' 0,1 : I -rte' I V111 { .4.. ..-.. --iiiIr' ' '.::!..,-, f I + a „ .12, ijr!., .4), - _.„ 1. 'II ' t44,i * yr I I V� r 1 i-i � ) .mss i ; — Vit ; 1-�, � ► + i aft CIS : 1''' / p (rk t.Pili--.:,.!:4-.4.),,i,:71;:‘,„ -,.:-,, , -;:. , ,----- ..:-:..,.. ., -- ---- I ::,- , - ,,,,,-..,..., ,..„. ..,,,,,,-;-- ..,,.. ,,,,,,,, ,,, . ,i)1/' t\ . �'• pie, . _, . @@fff I a ....:... t K .e. , .,„, 4 .7. .11 , .. . , , ._ .... , .,., , .. , .. . . , .. .„,,,,,;-..:1..„.,,:.7.. : 7 ., ... gig ,. .., . a 3 : [Dia> L Y -.me. .111 r '70 —)/ 'iiti i S ( T 1. E; .:0:,). 0,.,\:,1,.,,,,,7:::. ,i);:,),„.. .'_ = , ii-Fir 1::,:,,,, rIq' ♦i-„ A ' ( s• r,'� it .li ti ii.10511italr. ., ,, illhoirtil ifilf-'4-,7 A . A Jo .c., ; - 11,2_ ''..,.. ,, ' N I 1 , . � � E , ; It.- , , - , 4-,-. ., liw,HP - , ..., ,i, , t .. ... D !IP- I r10 ,t41 . f CD), it ` ` iitif ill _. ,.,G. �1 � `ftp ' ail I I , - k; .4i'----..- 444144, 4g T '' Iiik 1r , j '!' 1 _ .. . , ,...,............. . . , .....,...,.... 1 i • ,.., „. -..c...i,..., ..,_ -,, ,,-\, ..I,I.i.II,'I.'"il t/. ‘' I'• i ,„ „...,,, „., - . •,', -2 I . z.. ,.. .... .414*/' , # , , _..-.':::.:;,41) . .• ,'gavel ......;„ , • '- - ,...,,,.....- ..!III .-:,:,.•:i II' I.,,,:r, ':71- ,..,,,,,,, • ,_ „,.„ . . . , Jo :...: -'''' infillit'il'ii,,,i1°', , :"-- iiMiiMiiill'''.:'‘ , . . , • --.-'. _ '.° •-•:_!- -. ,-.-°,, 4, .... .......... , -- .. ,.. ,. . . ............. , .:..... 1- ,,...,. ... . .. ,„....„..,.. ,.,. , '' ...:, ''. ., . ... . 1111 , . ..„..,. .. . . .',.... ...--- - . „. .. . „ ,,. , • ' . . „:.....`'..?-1.t. .:,„1 • , ., ., air- . - . .-.• . , - . ,. • ,, , '-.. ..-- V. ,, •.. . 'is' ,. ,...' .,. . . , 444. . . .,,. , t.•''s, . ,,...,- '''' ':.-,..--' - ,,.,..,,-,-- . „, t i! ., 1 I III , , ---- ' ,-._..,. . I - i ..,. I i i i.... _ . . , -..,i ,,, . .-31minumpasw.- /... t-- ;44, ' k.. .-4,... 11 •., , ..., -„...... , , rii.T, -.; ,,„r,,..\.., - , ' ''' , 1 rl• r: , , :„.., , . C2)/ ..., . . . 1._., 1 : t .'. f,';hiii=,----1---- At_ 1--..)..3 . . ,., ... ., .... _ •=_,,t 1 . . . , ,......,, .... ti/ r . . 1 , i,-.'. . . . . ... - ,_ -..... - aV ..., A. . . •-,7'...,.: ',.. 1, = '. p.. Ai , . - : li ......„- ,.:„, Eli , , .,, . ;:, ,- .....,-, 4 -.'-'- ..,.....„ :-...„. .., ... .. . ......: .....„ , .... _ . -,- -,, 41-". .'r a... . . . .. . . ..„... , .... . . , . . ..... „, _ ... — - ........„..,. . ,., .... t. I 4 4 "A• 1 ... ...; ... , ,,,.... „ . . . ..„ . . . . , . . ,..., ,. 1 .\.......,.,_,....„ or- 1 ' ,- ' , . ......- ,.. _..., ' - eL: t 4 .......,• . . ,, A.,.••. 1 , I T H . , .... , •,' -* (Xi;r'''.' -• - ' 41 ...,......_ P , ... . \. ICI- ,,,_,,,.1,I,Il iiii — ,ct . i 1 , , ' . ',. -..' 14—cc—cC lk >c • I ,.. , ,,,....— ,. c„...k- e,,-'5i..).1 r 11,-,7"- f f: 4 , 4•44 - 440 .: . ,..- ... . .. -. .............. •• t.--...:.. .,-1,:r-2:,-..,..-4-- ,,,,* ., .., . , ..'.. -'• . . ,mmik- ..._ • , . IL i i �, 7 ...f.. 1A9 ..,....... ..„ , ,., .....„0„4„..„4:1060.,, \ -,,,...___,• ,.,r .....„,,,',../".„,.i7...,....r.... :':,. tr) ` mo.. + y�� ! °y�. smill re .' r }�` • i�l, ,//• I. i A,,‘,.,--,,,,, . 1-4 ,'Imititii n �h * ' .. .if',yr...Is...1, •. 0.: plr,.., U Ilikwarr , 'I'''..'. rs';';1::.',.,.10,:.71:r.:,_:„.....,::„.,:;:cittli;‘,L'.,4'',-......,...s,...,_,,.:„,,..i.'__.. ., ,. . .. - ., • \ ' * , .: ,. . . .. ......,..... ...1,....., ., „.... .„,,,....:, , , t . r '. .... •. , , , ... ..„.....-..,....... ,....,.: -:., .li r .5.;,;., ''' 1?''''.r.i'!:',;:;,:::;?:::':::/fr''. ,a ' . lot 111: I ■ • 4 I , , •t,. . . 1 ) - ,.•,4. . . . .. I , , 4 . „ . iii4 4 •., 4 • soma • - ., , .( !muff! ,,i, wfu„, ; , , 4 . .--1 • . ...„,,,:*,....... .(1) v s ....", . `:''',,,,7--.'",:'- ,•,'-.,- .i A , ,.-. '1i ' 4 4 ' ,.. . mimv,.4,0f; .... . ,. . II i I I i it,,... . . . .. Vitf:: 1 „7--,., . ,..—.1--- ., VIO 11W 1 ii.'.&:. ; 2' . I lik. , . . ,..' g.:'-,‘ ' 15 ''''.."‘... : 1 .,,, ' , ,,. ,,,,T:., ' ' . _ .. , ., , \''4;'*''''''''k.'' -J ''''' ' !lit , . ., ... . , 4. e-4,• , . :.: ."-. ..t. ,.....ir• ,'1,',- ..„ . . --, _ ..... - ::: tallik', LIT I , , • p ; I tAii* ,.. ' p I I , '''' 1 • 1 I ' ` , I '; 1 '' ; A WIN , ''''1!I' - ifillillt—°"":1—:1 '....': ' __:-* 1 ,, III i:I ' ' '' 1 fillgE , -- , „. ' ,.....** ! ' ,-)-:.•••- . 1 ',, :. ..„ It . __.. , , ... ... w . ,.., il '.. L . . _ , - , C.,:: 1 ..... t t , '', :- ii...e,' .I -"."' '. [-3 . `.r "" '. \ ' '.' ' ' k 'et& ' .‘;„i..,,,,,,,...,..„ •.i,..,,,„ . ..,,,i ,•,. D ...,-„.‘=.,,,,,i.-.0,. t '..:, ' , '7',::':'''A ' aill .aka ,k J , *ak �` • T iAlilt (1!/V I titi li ` ii ,, 1 . r . 7" • ,•,,,,,,,,, 4 •,,,,•,. • , , ,,,._.--- , ..,-,..... . - / , ., _ . F.,..-,-:-_, , . .„ .. . „. ,. ,,,,,,, , I , _Ill,L; flier v Air„,-; jurr.' ..-- ....1-' , ,4f--'4",,:::::-..=-'"..,--7,-J-:.4,---.4-'''il° ,4/..:,,,..-;-----,..-.,---„....7,,,,,,,,..,„ .....,„ „ ,t • . fl (R.j ' t 1 —L--- - w D .. . ... ..., „.....„,„„ ,... „,:t . 3 . ..., . , , ,......, ,,,..,.: .... . . .. . t ri:1 .. ., . .. , .... . ... ... .. . f717 I t .i4 ,� R . . . Igitii,:. .. .... w ,. g i tr' f . -''''',...„ ',.. I 7 '',:',..*-04e,jr.';:f?0.-. ., t �x .,.,,, . .. Al , C.) 0, lie MB* C)4‘11,,., , , . mg , G i /1 , .'s". i 4 ) 4.• 14 •4 4 I . ',... Nssss4.. .... . i 1 1 C--) ' • 4 , = .....a -.10.16 0: ., p , i . cL2T-1 . 1_ .:,.. . ,.. ...i. D) .,ag. AN , .., , k (, 1 - . ..,- • - . s .........._ ci• •-• , 4-4° , ,. 1 - ----. - ,.- ,..' •.. •••••444 / ' 444is • . ° f/1/ / m* MIS q / / _f- .%- , i ,-* -.., i •. I CiJ 1 - -- - •- / ' ,.....4 =, ., : C - ----t- , 1 co r- 4 4 no <. piD o c Emma• )• ,• ipeeema m'"'' q .,c1) UCI N n .10 o CU rt N --1 Oa D 1-k k.. . C") III 70 eC) zs et :- H till Po V 1--3 and• ri. a rD, _ rD - 0 D Cu r-t- m Z _i• :, „... ..., Ci) v) m ,, .1,5 c U a o • -1 ) 0 0 6 Fi C 4i bi 0 I. Q 0 O uD t— r— Gl O „ O O OK 0 fD = + D 2 r S• C C v -s • CD _ D �— • N rt oil �. n �i (j cCI) Ivi6D `G v cu (D C n CD v n O r Cr (O C O� C ''+, n rt O 3 a) C (-D -CD C M CM i O �' m � 7 0- tnjp) - r+ O = CD D Q = N X fl) Qa- c rt N fD C a) -< n Q o_ ',..i. a) -3 � = Q a) `,� 1 •. r-n'10 N fD 0 N• ( C 0 i 0) SP 0 Qri. e•+ N A U�-��v O fD ' fD (D l) c fD O• fD r+ r% Q ul1 _N t•r I 00 m• �- rte+ �• aq = =' `C tom" C mi Cn S N (n • cD -• UQ O D 70 • N rte-(- "� C C==am CD • o C K �MI ' C 73 Cr o m- < C m -13 al v n fD X Clt) r+ l� < prq N O < D' Q n Qo a) -a U = - O O = CCD fl- 3 co c.,) N m 0 m a) m C r� 0 rCCD t Vii X" N �- '�* �' C r+ O --- N3 fD N Q N N -S (D U4 O fD fD 5• CO C CCD N ,=1 Q O '4i Q O O rte+ N v g 73 N _� C �' C fl- cu C C CD O-' W coSz D N N r=+ n = Q fD — ,< SI) — l0 -� \ cn �' fD f7 - rt C K FE) Ocf, r+ r+ cu ni � FE) O' N 0 . 5. -0 : CD N = M O 3 Q _ CT 3 70 71 3 '' 0 + a) r— (1:0 — C C ray a) a) C = r=i N fD (Un N 5• 73 r+ Q n N Onr1 CD Q ?. CU C n = r+• V) r+ M 00 CD "< =h `< -, = C (J1 _Q - 0 Cr `< C a) — C C2-011 3— 0 --• 0 Cfc) r ? r•t Cl.. -z fD cn n O ..(r! r+ fD ' c- e- —h � NCD 0 C fD 0_ ca fD 70 ' () ,..F 5 v rfiQ (- N ...< J • • • Vt 1 N r+ -+, D -----• u, _ w > (7. D a- r— 11) n D Chi ? _ o O M. [11 COO Q- O N) Qi CD 0 ? "rta -A3 m � - 5' fD z=r CRI N r+ r+ a _a cm e rr+ v'P Vi=ce rN+ ' q (D -. C ,�.f. (D 17 a) 00 �� f7 i " r_F M. 0 ED T = ' c si r+ N `G• fD 0 rtcta C F� fD v M -1 Q fD o fp p W W N r- M fD < .< r v CCD • O (A ' �^ n 3 to = n N C n �- c n .J 0- rD C 0) p � � O.m , O = < r+ . , n rt O C A W `� tI7 fD • < (D CZ O OD -i+ v)' rp N n r N �• C m 3 0 3 - C iv -t , r) c 0 ct. 0, 3 ,� O M ?vi _. vl cn ? 00 r)., y '(fin N CI 0) 'Q. 0 = 0 (Pi O a OO0 el C e* CD -f, W O. -e ? fD 3 tC '- ni __ r+ a) M '0 --I v) --) • UN V' O — v p C - el- Cr C 0CL , � o r+ CD m x. W W W c r+ rD VfO 3 -f, _ -• 0 011 (1) 0 0 r3+ -' N o rG p fD > w w Ul 2 fD =' O = f0D -0 fD =r, r4 70 :S D Ora 3 wd . . G =' fD 3 W CO CO , v as N N .A.a w, -. i (A w a •- /yy/yi/�yI —. Z r 44 0] 001 CO n > CO to CCD ni r+ a ? r+ (Da) f=D . �. O �cn D rt M a MI N G�q o cn r o -1 r+ 0 Q 0 3 0 0- --- o C -0 a N C• 0 0 0 0 fD n .a cm ,,,1/ r _. -' - e_e C vii c d c rl ~ C — =• W W Y N C, cr 0_ cm O N• CT MfD C CU 0) my D� CD w fD V7 N v - r* .,�, 13 n r . n n T —. v1 cn 7C' r+ O� f D ::, ,,* ill'iti„. ,;i . ‘ : . :,16';'.'''''''''' 4*.''1 . 1''''. 4 WM ii Orli I 1 -tr, '—j 14,421 , . . .! k;.11.144411 g °�6' A Rt ! gg g , ell -- t.'� tlaleouthait r i ' 46111 .q �• y i , :it ! , F 4 7 �Iill R/ y N ..0.:.!8 j a ' ' E f I.i 1 • ----":" ,,,,,,_ s , t t ..3 Lt 2, 3 lit : 12r....,/ , 5. ' ";:: rr-a;WI f -4411P ,FE-r: Ur IIM7. a,t 4t3ims il lot i :0 , 41141 4 • :*. # 1r' # r t# # oi -i. 1 .' +�"' Y ' ..` it ', . VIA 1: 411. 1.g 'pro. ol tiS ,„.rylL: g . '�' . .: li: it i:,, ,i,....:s.i,, 5 tl 1 54 My14g1 lip ; , . , 1. n t -0 7 , t� r i ( $ ' 3 illiDY � •` 9 ..—. NY it i -,9;[_"1,,I ( { t` I. ; ,:. va............. . .1({,ji? ri, „_„/ ,,,,. 4 !. WA. - �.,. • 4114134, / I v ¢ y.u-o .' � x `s �`'4 MIII j„P - - ' * % illpiip lif /1 . #p c,,,D=r.i. _ _ .,,, . .41, s ot ',,,,, ,,,, . il, ,... ,i. wi.0,0„,„..1. ,,,,,,ii,,,,,,,,,,,„... •, 1,',14, s` L7 t'.-:,; 444 ii4. i,,* 4 r1 . ' . „ , , A, o , —or fir . *- 1,1 :,;- I . , f i 0 • A - A * r # 0 ,. . , ,, 14 illn illi„ I ii . --; i ,,,,,,, ,. (D. F, i r' = , 4' , E 1A4110 ti i { 441141 it „4 0 it, 1 .. - k,-r \‘‘,, n ■ ti - - CU cli! "'• * #. rte. �� ,�`t t<1� 1 ''; •\ - `.. ,,,-.•-;11.:.*1..4.,...,.., Ai.. i b i ---.„,.:Vahl- ':411.11416trse. '' its' ...,„4..,.,. !11/4' ro ... t . IA , ro Pr CO fir.rnr All Sit 1 kn' N s 4; " .+ •03FF Iii-4 14 , I, , _.....be 4, ot [` N O 1 4 In fD _ � �. r1 is ��� �6 t i- ,4;,‘„,_ ,„.._ _ * \ ..,„/ 04 41 B. II 1 r: 7.'" ://: , "� " ,. , r' h. ,./„ E �,� , ,I ke,_i 41:0::.s ! 1 i it 4„, ., . , , : , , ,OJ 7 r."1 3, : .„.- . ., . ,z,. .t. ,, I ' VS Alto • 4 ii? ' D '4::, --" ...•- -.'7,4' •. ' ''', fir -: -. • 8 '4 1;`,11-4. e '' dpi Lk 5 L r>; i:� ck' rDi 1 •j L., '. .... ; , 4 a *rr has N ; lifi _ t -ill * ' ' III k. 1 A6-1 1 _ ',, gu '� - i Dr �r y i ` W 1 i 0 it : ''`, . o"..4.-olovo, I ' ' : C)1 PD ,T4ir . t 4,: J LO__i_f)) 0 t. 4 1 I , C I � p 1 i -•.'1•;.'":„:!.2.-,.f..A 1V < . ' � ,�. l � ft * . r iir a 1 4 _ 1 ,. o . i_ 1 p o -i�- O, . 4 I � ' 1 i cry H C 0 C, 0 0 0 C4 r) p '-ci 2+) ; cL-17 1 e 2 -v •.9 g.) 4 ;),)t- 5 P 11: � W (- _-_,t- C7 ►--s- CD p•r• a'' CD �--�• CD ° CD' —-. a P : �---' Cl) � n Dn oO � � mid `°,� t"l � Op3 0• .� I N P (.11 I-►- 0 • Cr2 n 1,7)F4 Ciq "I ` 5* 2 eD .........„ —. i_t . , ,...• ,.., , 6— c•-f- CrQ • - • �- Cr n ' P' C A� CD �i CD o ,�• .1 ,__,. '^�, CD 4 P r•-t- CD n 0 7d(- to 0 o oma, ,••; O CD cf) � o cn 5 re c4 cn SCD �� �• C Fp.) : 0.-•• H ,.r•C4 °� )71 ° CD P n cn UC? EH CD' � � CD - )-t I! �, 0 ° C) C a 5 I ' j 0 * ro v U I(15 I— m n13 � ti-o13 � G) - OD —ID DCD 3xrn A c c o' rn = o' Z U u aXI °. °, o a, CO �lo a a 3> U u a a - —Imom r�. a V) � � �' Q � � m � � 3 Z 0CD 3 .� ! 0 13cr, m .« Z 11) - T pk- o m o m c ao it ro a� =, j 4 a_ * 0 0oc .4. 1. dc D, = m oo ° p Ill n_ Ia0p 9.co Q r cn ""S r c Q1 a) 0 1 ..a o /� 0a coo o we P3 m g. rs3 O c .....0aa= m wy = =. Ca 03 0 �o p ... o as ". p 8N° Zig 0 oNMI m u) a, vor O ......• _a- 4 c mod• CrCI' ommos D O rf- qD S" P O cu 171 • rata d n Mcm rD C Cin p:J ° 0 Imi 0 E N O. rD 0 C'D cA rot' D crZ fii 1 Cfq V) 0 *-0 cip Co- 3ca., O .....• , VIalma• rim CO mina•n r-I" GoodnerAngela From: Julie <okmarmiel @aol.com> Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2018 6:24 AM To: SolisAndy;Jen Moen Subject: STOCK DEVELOPMENT Dear Mr. Solis, Our family have a home in Barrington Cove. We bought there for any number of reasons not the least of which is the beauty, quiet, nature-friendly atmosphere. We chose Barrington Cove because it is a single family neighborhood in which homes are PURCHASED by those who reside in them therefore the initiative to keep Barrington Cove lovely,safe, neighborhoodly and cohesive as a development is paramount. We cannot emphasize STRONGLY enough to you our COMPLETE disgust at the proposed development by Stock.This development will do absolutely nothing but DESTROY the beauty, peace of mind and peace and quiet of Barrington Cove and the surrounding developments within miles of Barrington Cove. We understand the quest for the almighty dollar is paramount to any developer.They do not reside in the areas they develop and destroy.They have no soul or conscience about destroying neighborhoods into which families have invested a great deal of their money and hope to raise their families.This is why they must be checked and watched and held back from doing what they instinctively gravitate towards: in this case the destruction of many of family friendly neighborhoods and the pleasant atmospheres created thereby. I have read in depth the notes from the meeting Stock engaged in with residents. Besides the outright rage and deep sorrow amongst the population, is the worry about the blatant lies Stock expounded. Surely somewhere in every city in the United States, a 1000 square foot apartment renting at$1400 a month is considered luxury. NOT in Naples. Not by a long shot.The only guarantee that this will happen in Naples is if the Stock development goes in.Then values of every home in the vicinity will fall so low that a storage unit with a lazy-boy lounger and a side table will be able to be labeled "luxury". We urge you, PLEAD WITH YOU to SAVE US! SAVE OUR NEIGHBORHOOD and our INVESTMENT in our neighborhood. PLEASE, PLEASE.... DO THE RIGHT THING. Gratefully Yours Sam and Julia Spigelman and Family Sent from my iPhone RECEIVED Wt. 'ei•wea' ; Se4iteoge, DEC 0 5 2018 5921r1� '..C'~ a, /Ci3�lll OFFICES OF COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ALLURA REZONING REQUEST HEARING Thursday December 6 at 9:00 A.M. Collier County Government Center County Commissioners Chambers, 3rdTHIRD FLOOR 3299 Tamiami Trail, East Naples,FL 34112 Dear Commissioners: We have heard that the Stock Development has applied to have the property at the southeast corner of Livingston Road and Veterans Parkway re-zoned from 170 homes to 420 "luxury apartments."These one,two, and three-bedroom units will use Veterans Parkway as their main exit and entrance,which will cause much more traffic and congestion for Strand residents who use the back gate. We support the Strand and our neighbors at Mediterra,Talis Park and Barrington Cove who are in opposition this change. While we are unable to physically attend the first hearing on December 6th, we want you to know that there are more neighbors who are opposed to changing the zoning. No doubt,there were strong arguments made when the 170 homes were allowed. Perhaps it was that that size and height of the buildings fit into the nature and ambience of the neighborhood and the need to maintain a certain amount of green in Collier County. Personally, we are concerned with putting extra pressure on the schools at the county line with Lee by overpopulating the corner. The new increase in units at that corner will likely make that congestion worse. Anyone who has been in that area before school opens and when it closes can attest to dangerous lines of cars trying to turn onto Veterans' Parkway In addition, any children crossing the intersection of Livingston and Veterans' Parkway would face endangerment in the face of grossly increased traffic. Please vote against this proposed change. Please don't turn Naples into Fort Myers. Sincerely, James J. Scavone,Jr. Elaine L. Villazon Commissioner Andy Solis, Esq. Scanned Records Cover Sheet Date Material Received: 3/I 19 Received From: Bab P(1 , KacrU ` Med-A-4itVY- Description: MORRIS 2914 Cleveland Avenue I Fort Myers, Florida 33901 DEPEW Phone (239) 337-3993 I Toll Free (866)337-7341 www.morris-depew.com ENGINEERS • PLANNERS •SURVEYORS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS Analysis:SD Livingston, LLC-Allura PL20170004419/CP-2018-1 Collier County Board of Commissioners'Transmittal Hearing Date: March 26, 2019 Introduction and Background The requested GMPA would add the Livingston Road/Veterans Memorial Boulevard Residential Subdistrict category to the Future Land Use Element of the CGMP. The request has been amended several times, and currently contains conditions that would limit the total allowable density to 304 units or 8.55 units per gross acre. (A companion rezoning request would change the zoning from the A, Rural Agricultural and Residential Planned Unit Development(Della Rosa) zoning districts to Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD)to develop a multi- family residential project of 3041 dwelling units, a clubhouse and accessory uses on the±35.57- acre site.)The GMPA request, however, would allow up to a maximum density of 12 dwelling units per acre.The subject site is located on the east side of Livingston Road, and south side of Veterans Memorial Boulevard, in Section 13,Township 48 South, Range 25 East. According to the documents accompanying the Site Development Plan request,the maximum building height would be 50', zoned, and 60', actual. Buildings would be four stories in height, and buffers would range from a 10'Type A up to a 20'Type C.There would be 15'Type B buffer adjacent to approved single-family residential uses to the east of the subject property. Approximately 42%of the site qualifies as wetlands of varying quality. The subject property is currently designated Urban-Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict, as identified on Future Land Use Map of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). Relevant to this petition,the Urban Residential Subdistrict provisions allow a maximum density of four(4) dwelling units per acre (DU/A) as a base density. The subject property is located within a Transportation Concurrency Management Area, and TCMA and Affordable Housing bonuses could potentially increase that number to a total of 15 dwelling units per acre without an amendment to the CGMP. The applicant, however, is not requesting bonus density, but rather a GMPA that would increase the total allowable density per acre up to 8.55 dwelling units. The proposed amendment states: "The Livingston Road/Veterans Memorial Boulevard East Residential Subdistrict consists of 35.57±acres and is located in the southeast quadrant of the intersection 1 Documents for the accompanying submittals variously describe the subject property as between 35.57 acres up to 35.91 acres,and the final development plan between 336 up to 368 multi-family units.At the CCPC meeting on January 16,2019 the applicant verbally agreed to reduce the total number of dwelling units to 304.The boundary survey lists the total acreage as 35.566 acres.As noted above,the GMPA,if approved,would allow up to 8.55 units per acre. Analysis:SD Livingston,LLC-Allura PL20170004419/CP-2018-1 CCBOCC Hearing Date:March 26,2019 Page 12 of Livingston Road and Veterans Memorial Boulevard. The purpose of this Subdistrict is to allow for a multi-family development at a density of up to 304 total dwelling units and to fulfill the intent of the TCMA, as stated in FLUE Policy 6.1. Development in this Subdistrict shall be subject to the following: a. The Subdistrict site shall be rezoned to Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD). b. Allowable uses are limited to multi-family rental dwellings and shall not exceed 350 units. c. The RPUD shall demonstrate consistency with FLUE Policy 6.3 by providing two or more of the following: i. A transit shelter within the RPUD in a location and design approved by Collier County Public Transit& Neighborhood Enhancement (PINE) Division; ii. Bicycle and pedestrian facilities, with connection to the abutting commercial property to the west: and, iii. Vehicular interconnection to the abutting commercial property to the west. Certificates of occupancy shall not be approved for more than 249 multi-family units (a density of 7.0 units per acre) until the applicable facilities and/or interconnections, as described above and approved as Development Commitments in the RPUD, have been completed. d.The RPUD shall include development standards and buffers to insure compatibility with surrounding land uses." t _. r• ""�!_. yy .p4 tail Ci. t` rte 7 ,Y , tra, ' 1,• A • Figure 1:Subject with Surrounding Development Analysis:SD Livingston,LLC-Allure PL20170004419/CP-2018-1 CCBOCC Hearing Date:March 26,2019 Page 13 Surrounding land uses include the Brandon Residential Planned Unit Development to the east and south, Royal Palm Academy to the southeast,The Enclave Residential Planned Unit Development to the southwest, undeveloped C-1 zoning to the west, Agriculture zoned property to the west, and the Mediterra Planned Unit Development to the northwest, north, and north east.The C-1 parcel located to the west of the subject property is designated as the Livingston Road/Veterans Memorial Blvd. Commercial Infill Subdistrict. Discussion and Analysis Objective 5 of the Future Land Use Element indicates that the County will promote sound planning that ensures, among other things,the compatibility of land uses. Policy 5.6 of the Future Land Use Element states, "New developments shall be compatible with, and complementary to,the surrounding land uses, as set forth in the Land Development Code." Development Acres Units Units per Acre FLUM Category Mediterra 1,168 750 0.64 Urban Residential Brandon 51.1 204 ` 3.99 ! Urban Residential The Enclave 28.38 114 4.02 ` Urban Residential Royal Palm Academy 162.7 550 3.38 Urban Residential Table 1:Surrounding Development Summary Based upon the surrounding land uses,the requested density of 8.55 units per acre represents an increase ranging between 2.13 times up to 13.36 times the existing densities.The plan amendment does not provide for any incentives for density beyond those that would normally be available for the additional 3 units per acre available for proposed TCMA improvements. Under the existing designation,there would normally be a requirement for provision of affordable housing, but the current request eliminates that necessity, and the proposal is for 'market rate' rental housing. The property lies within the Northwest Transportation Concurrency Management Area (TCMA) which potentially makes it eligible for a 3 DU/A density bonus, potentially increasing the total density for 4 units per acre to 7 units per acre, without a change in land use designation. Policy 5.6 of the Transportation Element indicates that a TCMA will be designated to encourage compact urban development where an integrated and connected network of roads is in place that provide multiple,viable alternative travel paths or modes for common trips. In order for a development to be exempt from link-specific concurrency requirements, developments within the TCMA must provide not less than 2 Transportation Demand Management (TDM)strategies as detailed in the Land Development Code (LDC). According to LDC Section 6.02.02(L) states, "In order to be exempt from link specific concurrency, new residential development or redevelopment within Collier County's designated Transportation Concurrency Management Areas (TCMAs) shall utilize at least 2 of the following Transportation Demand Management (TDM)strategies, as may be applicable: a. Including neighborhood commercials uses within a residential project. b. Providing transit shelters within the Analysis:SD Livingston,LLC-Altura P120170004419/CP-2018-1 CCBOCC Hearing Date:March 26,2019 Page 14 development (must be coordinated with Collier County Transit). c. Providing bicycle and pedestrian facilities, with connections to adjacent commercial properties. d. Including affordable housing(minimum of 25%of the units) within the development. e. Vehicular access to adjacent commercial properties."This language echoes that found in FLUE Policy 6.5. The applicant has indicated an intention to provide a transit shelter and connection to the adjoining commercial development, once that development is undertaken. The latter commitment is dependent upon the ultimate design of the commercial property and may be outside the applicant's ability to guarantee. The applicant has not committed to any of the other TDM strategies. The applicant has submitted studies regarding demand for the proposed development as a rental community. The first study, by Axiometrics, indicates that the property would consist of 320 units - 144 one-bedroom units (45%), 144 two-bedroom units (45%) and 32 three-bedroom units (10%). This is 106 dwelling units less than that which would be allowed under the proposed GMPA. Further, this study indicates that the proposed development should have luxurious interior amenities to be competitive within the market and command higher rental rates. The proposed analysis is not targeting affordable or workforce housing. Additionally, an analysis by Myers Research was provided discussing demand and supply of new market based rental property. That study concluded that net demand by 2022 would reach 2,672 units, with supply amounting to 2,732 units (including the proposed Allura development). The Myers study includes rental units with monthly rates up to$2,500; this is clearly not affordable/workforce housing, and there is no discussion regarding the socioeconomic status of the proposed renters for the subject property. Further,the increase in demand for renter occupied housing units projected between 2018 and 2023 is only 645 units for the County. There appears to be little support for the need to increase overall density on the subject property to a level between 2.13 times up to over 13 times the properties in the area. The Myers Research report does note that the employment centers are located to the west and south of the subject property. A review of the Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) accompanying the request suggests that traffic on Immokalee Road,west of the intersection with Livingston, is problematic. Since that is the direction of the majority of employment and support services, it is clear that increased traffic resulting from the approval of the proposal will impact that situation. The TIS also indicates that the improvements to Veterans Memorial Blvd. will not be undertaken until 2022, an does not indicate when those improvements will be completed. Chapter 163.3177(6)(a)2, FS indicates that plan amendments must be based upon data and analysis including the amount of land necessary to accommodate anticipated growth, the projected seasonal and permanent population, and the character of the undeveloped land. The request for a GMPA adds 53 dwelling units to the subject property that it could not achieve without provision of affordable housing. At 7 units per acre,the density with the proposed TDM strategies met on site, the total number of units to be permitted would be 249. No GMPA Analysis:SD Livingston,LLC-Altura P120170004419/CP-2018-1 CCBOCC Hearing Date:March 26,2019 nage I 5 would be required, and there has been no indication that the existing land use designation is somehow burdensome to the land owner. There are economically viable development options for the subject property as shown both by the market studies provided as well as by the existing development patterns in the area. There is no compelling necessity to provide for such a significant increase in development density on the subject property. Further, there has been no data and analysis provided that would suggest a compelling reason for waiving the requirement of providing affordable/workforce housing as an incentive for added density. There are no data provided suggesting that the proposed amendment addresses an unmet need which exists at this location in the County. In fact, the Collier County Community Housing Plan (October 24, 2017) indicates, "The county is expected to add 58,000 households over the next 23 years. If the local issue of cost burden is not addressed, then —at a minimum - 11,000 more households will experience severe cost burden (above 50 percent)than do households today." Further, "There is a Jobs-Housing imbalance in Collier County resulting in at least 17.4%of the workforce (approximately 40,000 people) commuting daily from outside of Collier County." As of September 2017,the Community Housing Plan estimates that housing demand for extremely low, very low, and low-income housing would be ±1,618 dwelling units per year. The applicants have not provided any basis for a waiver or elimination of the existing policy which provides for bonus density when providing for this type of housing. Without adequate data and analysis to support the modification of the currently applicable future land use designation to the proposed designation,the amendment does not comply with Chapter 163.3177(6)(a)2, FS. Additionally, the lack of data and analysis is contrary to the requirements of 163.3177(1)(f) and creates internal inconsistency within the plan as a result of such a waiver or elimination of the affordable housing requirement. The introduction to the GMP's Housing Element states, "The development of private housing in Collier County is driven by an expensive housing stock; effectively excluding low-income and working class families from the housing market. Thus, there is a need for the County to find ways to encourage the provision of affordable-workforce housing for these families." Objective 1 of the Housing Element indicates that Collier County will, "Provide new affordable housing units in order to meet the current and future housing needs of legal residents with very-low, low, moderate and affordable workforce incomes, including households with special needs such as rural and farmworker housing in rural Collier County." Policy 1.10 of the GMP's Housing Element states, "The County shall create or preserve affordable housing to minimize the need for additional local services and avoid the concentration of affordable housing units only in specific areas of the jurisdiction. Programs and strategies to encourage affordable-workforce housing development may include, but are not limited to, density by right within the Immokalee Urban area and other density bonus provisions, impact fee deferrals, expedited permitting(fast tracking), public-private partnerships, providing technical assistance and intergovernmental coordination." Policy 2.9 of the Housing Element states, "The County shall review its Affordable-workforce Housing Density Bonus Ordinance every three years or sooner, as necessary, and revise the Ordinance, as necessary, to reflect changing community needs and market conditions. (The purpose of the Affordable-workforce Housing Density Bonus Ordinance Analysis:SD Livingston,LLC-Altura P120170004419fCP-2016-1 CCBOCC Hearing Date:March 26,2019 Page I 6 shall be to encourage the blending of affordable housing density bonus units into market rate developments as well as to support developments exclusively providing affordable housing.)" Based upon the existing CGMP Goals, Objectives and Policies, approval of the requested amendment is contrary to Chapter 163.3177(2), FS. This provision of the Statute provides that coordination among elements shall be a major objective of the planning process and that the various elements must be consistent. Additionally, 163.3177(6)(f) requires that the housing element of a comprehensive plan provides housing for all current and future residents of the jurisdiction, including provision of housing for very low, low, and moderate-income families. The current amendment is not based upon the best available data and analysis—as demonstrated in the Collier County Community Housing Plan —and is contrary to that requirement. Further, as demonstrated in the Housing Plan,the data and analysis reflects a significant need for extremely low, very low and low income housing, yet the amendment proposes to eliminate any component of the bonus associated with provision of that need contrary to the provisions of chapter 163.3177(6)(f)2, and 163.3177(6)(f)3, FS, further compounding the internal inconsistency that would be created should the amendment be approved. Staff indicates that at a macro level, the proposed GMPA may well be compatible with the area in which it is located. The Staff Report goes on to note that the rezoning petition must by analyzed with regards to specific compatibility measures. The proposed Site Development Plan shows buffers of 15' between existing single-family residences and the development. The proposed rezoning allows heights of up to 50' (zoned) and 60' (actual), for a series of massive, four-story buildings, all of which are necessary to place the 304 dwelling units on a property with significant wetlands that encompass over 40%of the site. Further, the applicant has indicated that it has the ability to construct the Della Rosa development at its current density and with its current configuration, creating larger, more massive buildings located closer to the perimeter of the subject property.The applicant fails to note, however,that the SFWMD has already denied the permits for the prior development plan; the denial was issued by the SFWMD on May 14, 2009. Conclusion The GMPA requested is unnecessary and fails to demonstrate any kind of deficiency which it is intended to address. The subject property has an economically viable and reasonable use,the applicant can achieve a reasonable density through the utilization of existing provisions of the Growth Management Plan, and the documents submitted for the companion requests demonstrate that compatibility with adjoining and proximate development will not be achieved based upon the current development plans.Although the traffic analysis has not identified any specific problems associated with the development, it is noted that the employment centers and commercial development servicing the subject property are located primarily south and west of the subject property. The additional traffic proposed by the development will certainly add to congestion of the roadways in the area, and the east-west improvements to Veterans Analysis:SD Livingston,LLC-Allure P120170004419/CP-2018-1 CCBOCC Hearing Date:March 26,2019 Page 17 are not scheduled to commence until FY 2022. Approval of the proposed amendment is contrary to the requirements of Chapter 163.3177, FS as noted above. It is not based upon proper data and analysis, creates internal inconsistencies in the CGMP, and violates specific Goals, Objectives and Policies in the CGMP. Further the failure to comply with the specific requirements of chapter 163.3177, FS means that the amendment is not "in compliance" as that term is defined in Chapter 163.3184, FS. It is my professional opinion that the Collier County Board of Commissioners should decline transmittal of the proposed amendment based upon its failure to conform to the requirements of the Statute and the lack of a necessity to provide the development options being requested by the applicant. David W. Depew, PhD,AICP, LEED AP Principal &Co Founder Morris-Depew Associates, Inc. ' dy " . 4. r. ii; ' ce'� ' }•. G �ps;t y *� � ,,Mir Iw .' 4 ` �y� rtt -- r,, 4 ;A �S`° t t � : .s'ry' R ' SI4Y{ Y �r^r' _ 'i $.-4,,-,r,SS ,,,...„.,,-'';'-4,-;:4-„:;!,,,,,,:• -•'•••''''�Lr ���b '�3 '4-74;1 ^ -'v ,:t a..- { x sx - �'fity? .:.0.,..,,,,„,-,,,,,,,,---,-0.--...Y�d { - 3- � t *"�: t # - • ,, �4 < ,� . tf � y „,,,,I.,;,.7.:),;:-.-, fi r4Y- � � os f . ?,`k-. ”" 3• -�, `t.'tz z s"` a. aesa': ---ft-...,-.,-.0--t,,,,,-,- -- . , - :-•• -,-',"'.,-..• ,.- .,--.f,;,p,.'„,-;.--,,,,,L,Nt . e=+s ' y o` " 3 7 :: •tib, „ ,-- e'.� p -v 3 ,_. 4 ,-.--1.4 .t • ,-,4,,,i4,..#4,-...,.Yk,w ; +,.,F" ita - y' - �, ' ."+a',..,� ,..,-?,-.'1:-`,,,5''', Phi 3 �S XI., a vk ` £ -' ., " '- gyp. 'mow C b: •3<^ � , �1a� <r mss --- ...t)-11.A.-i,"1: a_. �A.,- y r, ,4 5iF'�3,:: , a ' cp t" t GoodnerAngela From: Thomas Griffith <thomasm.griffith@icloud.com> Sent: Monday, November 26,2018 3:09 PM To: SolisAndy Cc: GoodnerAngela Subject: Opposition to Allura Apartment Complex-PETITION #PL-20170004419/CP-2018-1 Dear Commissioner Solis— I'm writing in regards to my opposition to the Allura project, petition#PL-20170004419/CP-2018-1 to the rezoning so 420 rental apartments can be built on this property. My self and the majority of the people I know are not opposed to single family homes being built in this area. We are opposed to the property being rezoned so 420 rental apartments can be built. The rental apartments will house a minimum of 735 tenants and does not fit into the landscape of this area. Traffic- Immokalee Rd.to Bonita Beach Rd. has no East/West exits for 4.2 miles. Regularly and every week day during season traffic is backed up on Livingston every afternoon for hours from Bonita Beach Rd. south to Veterans Memorial Blvd. and further. To get my son to baseball practice in Bonita I have to go south to Immokalee to 41 then north to Bonita. These 420 rental apartments will certainly add to this congestion. Home Values-Most studies show at least a 12.7%decline in property values near multifamily rental apartments. There is a perceived stigma with apartments having higher crime and less desirable tenants. Whether this is true or not doesn't matter as it's the perceived stigma that keep people from buying homes next to rental apartments. Schools—What will the impacts be on the schools? Veterans Memorial Elementary is already at capacity and North Naples Middle School is at 86%capacity. I hope you can support the thousands of residents that oppose a project that is not consistent with the current land uses in the area and will have a negative impact to our investments and quality of life. We would like to continue to support you as our commissioner as you support us. Thanks. Tom Commissioner Andy Solis, Esq. Scanned Records Cover Sheet Date Material Received: 3 l 1S/10\ Received From: ?xnws 6yek.05 tnteo►'v1, 60AWAGaav-, D(‘eldt Description: RUQ Robert Walczak 16285 Aberdeen Way Naples Fl 34110 Email March 12, 2019 Commissioner Solis Collier County Commissioner District 2 Dear Commissioner Solis: "I am sending this email in regards to the Allure Project proposed to be literally built in my back yard. I am a firefighter in Naples and my wife is a nurse. We have 3 small boys and I am very disappointed this project has even been considered. We moved to Barrington Cove for a better sense of community and safety. This project is going to be a eye sore to me as my backyard will be facing the buildings. My pool faces the parking area. I promise you that the safety concerns are very real for me. I have been in many similar buildings in the county and nothing I want in my back yard! This is NO sense of community and very upsetting for us. I worked very hard to get my family into our neighborhood. This all will change if this project is approved. Serve your citizens! Put our communities/families first and not someone's pockets! Q VETERANS MEMORIAL BLVD 0 ic r c' z ALLURA EARRINGTCDD COVE F "Sincerely, Rob Walczak LETTER OF CONCERN FROM THE STRAND HOMEOWNERS We the residents of the Strand would like to direct this appeal to the County regarding the request by Stock Development to rezone the 35-acre parcel at the northeast corner of Livingston and Veteran's Memorial Boulevard from a 170 single family home development to a four story 420-unit rental apartment complex.While we appreciate the need for affordable housing in Collier County,Stock admittedly said this is not'affordable housing,' but rather high-end luxury apartments. We, along with numerous communities in the area, stand strongly opposed to this rezoning request for the following reasons.As a community of 1,074 residences,we hope our voices are heard. First and foremost, is the untold traffic impact this will have on the stretch of Livingston from Vanderbilt to Bonita Beach Road.Currently all communities whose egress and ingress are on Livingston are virtually 'house bound'in the morning and afternoons from 3:30-6:30.Traffic does not move and is backed up at a dead stop from lmmokalee to Bonita Beach Rd.going North. In addition, lmmokalee,where our front gate is located, is backed up both east and west.This is the current reality before the two new communities,already underway along Livingston between this same stretch,are completed. North Naples has quickly become oversaturated with developments at an alarming rate.These additional developments do not only impact traffic, but also the natural wetlands and flood zones. The parcelof land Stock is considering for its Allura Project is a flood zone. It is easy to see what all the building has done to these natural flood zones.When it rains profusely and/or there is a hurricane such as last year,the residents along the Imperial River are flooded. Where is all the water to go if development and building continues unabated?Surely there are large tracts of land east of 1-75 available for development like Allura project that would have much less impact on the established single-family home developments that already exist at the current proposed location. Additionally,this 4 mile stretch of Livingston between Vanderbilt and Bonita Beach Road, has 3 schools and a fire station,all of which add to congested and dangerous traffic patterns in the mornings and afternoons. It's hard to imagine how everyone will get out and complete their U-turns on Livingston when the fire station there turns on its red lights for fire truck to exit and enter the station. It is also our understanding that the elementary school at the end of Veterans is already at capacity and would not be able to enroll additional students. Veteran's Memorial Boulevard is an extremely short stretch of a narrow two-lane road with no bike lane or shoulder and comes to a dead end, both east and west. Currently 3 neighborhoods already have gates that empty onto this less than half mile stretch between Livingston and the east dead-end.This project proposes to place a gate for this apartment complex residents on this same small stretch. When the gardeners are working(weekly), it is down to one lane,a dangerous wait and pass situation.This also happens when commercial trucks line up and block the north gate of The Strand. In addition to traffic woes, we are faced with a growing population of displaced bears who are invading our neighborhoods daily.This has become a problem beyond the capacity of Florida Wildlife Commission which reports they have nowhere to move them. Unfortunately, bears are now appearing daily roaming mid-day in people's garages, and even in an open window of a home recently.The few remaining wooded areas we have left in North Naples should be preserved as a habitat for these bears since currently the only plan FWC asks community member to learn to live side by side with the bears. Lastly, research tells us that the proximity of such a rental apartment complex of this size and capacity will undoubtedly affect the values of our properties and this in turn,will ultimately negatively affect the County tax coffers. When will Collier County Commissioners say"Enough of enough: and really begin to do the job they were elected to do-monitor the ongoing overdevelopment of this area of North Naples.The last of our green areas are being stripped, leaving Naples void of the very thing that attracts people to this area. We cannot simply continue to cut down the few remaining green areas that add to the beauty that sets Naples apart from other communities. We implore you to give this matter every consideration and deny this rezoning request. We invite you to come visit us at the Strand and please come during season at 4:00 and try to get in the gate on Veteran's Memorial Drive off Livingston or the front gate off lmmokalee. We can do a car count together if you bring a clicker. GoodnerAngela From: patrick mccartney <reloretta@icloud.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 4, 2019 9:29 AM To: SolisAndy Subject: Altura RPUD Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed Your mission statement says you are committed to ensuring the responsible management of the growth in Collier County, if this is truly something you believe in then VOTE NO on September 24th Sent from my iPad GoodnerAngela From: stephen dorazio <sdorazio2117@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday,August 27, 2019 4:19 PM To: SolisAndy Subject: Allura Proposal I live in The Strand Community in North Naples. Please DO NOT approve the Stock proposal for the Allura apartment complex on Livingston and Veterans Memorial Parkway.This apartment complex does not belong in our neighborhood. Thank you. Stephen D'Orazio GoodnerAngela From: Amy Markley <amymarkley56@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday,August 7, 2019 2:43 PM To: FialaDonna; SolisAndy; SaundersBurt; McDanielBill; Penny.Taylor@colliercounty.gov; katywrede@gmail.com;Alex. Markley Subject: Allura Apts I'm writing this to express my grave concern over the Allura Project. I and my entire community, at The Strand,of 1100 households, strongly recommend that you give a resounding NO vote to this project. I have been a full-time resident of over 8 yrs. and have Never heard such angry people.We are going to be watching very carefully and we be at the September meeting. If you don't support us in this important endeavor,we will be looking for people that will support us in the future. Amy Markley 352-502-2445 Sent from my iPad GoodnerAngela From: Cynthia Roland <cynthiarolandslah@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, August 7, 2019 7:54 AM To: SolisAndy Subject: Re: RE: Dear Andy, Thank u do much for the follow up and information provided in regards to our NO vote request ! We appreciate knowing u cared enough to respond!! We will keep following this project of course!! Again -thanks for being there Cynthia Roland The Strand Sent from my iPhone On Aug 6, 2019, at 4:42 PM, SolisAndy<Andy.Solis@colliercountyfl.gov>wrote: Hello, Ms. Roland: Thank you for sharing your thoughts on the proposed Allura project. We know that it takes time and effort to be an active member of the community; your willingness to be involved is appreciated. While the volume of emails received at the District 2 office is too great for Commissioner Solis to reply individually, he reviews each one and may reach out to you to gather more information if it seems appropriate. Know that even if he does not contact you again,your voice has been heard. In case you weren't aware,the adoption hearings for the Growth Management Plan Amendment and the companion PUD amendment for Allura are currently scheduled for the following dates: September 24, 2019—Board of County Commissioners This meeting will be held at the government complex at 3299 Tamiami Trail East-- marked 'County Admin' on this map-- beginning at 9am. You are invited to attend, or you can watch it live online, or on local cable channel 97. Shortly following the meeting,the video will be available to watch on demand. Thanks again for taking the time to be an engaged citizen; it is so important to the process. Please feel free to call or email whenever we can be of assistance. Sent on behalf of Commissioner Solis by Angela Goodner, Executive Coordinator Andy Solis, Esq., District 2 Commissioner Collier County Board of County Commissioners Phone: 239.252.8602 Fax: 239.252.6947 Sign up for the District 2 newsletter HERE! Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records.If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request,do not send electronic mail to this entity.Instead, contact this office by telephone at 239-252-8602 or in writing at 3299 Tamiami Trail E,Suite 303, Naples, FL 34112. Original Message From:Cynthia Roland<cvnthiarolandslah@gmail.com> Sent: Saturday,August 3, 2019 1:10 PM To:SolisAndy<Andy.Solis@colliercountvfl.gov> Subject: Nobto Allure appts please-we r residents of The Strand Thank u Sent from my iPhone GoodnerAngela From: Cynthia Roland <cynthiarolandslah@gmail.com> Sent: Saturday,August 3, 2019 1:10 PM To: SolisAndy Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed Nobto Allure appts please-we r residents of The Strand Thank u Sent from my iPhone GoodnerAngela From: charlie hirschfeld <hirschfeldcharlie@gmail.com> Sent: Friday,August 2,2019 3:18 PM To: GoodnerAngela Subject: apartment project Hi Angela, I just learned that the planning commision voted 3-2 against the proposed apartement project on Livingston Road next to Mediterra. I hope that Commissioner Solis will vote against the project at the County Commissioners meeting since this traffic issue is in his District 2. With all of the traffic on Livngston Road and with Seed to Table opening up in November which will cause even more traffic on Livingston Road it will be a bigger nightmare.That nice freindly road is now an unfriendly road. Hope all is well Regards Charlie Hirschfeld GoodnerAngela From: Cathy Miranti <cathymiranti@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday,August 1, 2019 4:18 PM To: SolisAndy Subject: Re:Allura apts Della Rosa is not Allura. Let them build Della Rosa. Prevent Allura Cathy Miranti On Thu,Aug 1, 2019 at 11:54 AM SolisAndy<Andy.Solis@colliercountyfl.gov>wrote: Hello, Ms. Miranti: Thank you for sharing your thoughts on the proposed Allura project. We know that it takes time and effort to be an active member of the community;your willingness to be involved is appreciated. If you were not able to attend or watch any of the earlier hearings at which this project was discussed, you can see the March Board of County Commissioners (BCC) discussion HERE<http://collier.granicus.com/MediaPlaver.php?view id=4&clip id=2619&meta id=120097>. Watching this discussion can provide important information to those who aren't yet aware that about half the land included in the Allura proposal is already zoned for 4-story apartments, and has been since 2007, in a PUD called Della Rosa. Although it comes as a surprise to many neighbors, apartments were planned there before most of the surrounding developments were built. Allura is proposed as an alternative to that earlier PUD by the new property owner, but the Della Rosa apartments were approved by prior County Commissioners and nothing can be done now to prevent them from being built. In case you weren't aware,the adoption hearings for the Growth Management Plan Amendment and the companion PUD amendment for Allura are currently scheduled for the following dates: August 1, 2019-Planning Commission September 24, 2019- Board of County Commissioners These meetings will be held at the government complex at 3299 Tamiami Trail East-- marked 'County Admin' on this map<https://www.colliercountyfl.gov/Home/ShowDocument?id=8041>-- beginning at 9am. You are invited to attend, or you can watch it live online<https://www.colliercountyfl.gov/Home/ShowDocument?id=8041>, or on local cable channel 97. Shortly following the meeting,the video will be available to watch on demand<https://www.colliercountyfl.gov/your-government/divisions-a-e/communication-customer-relations- division/meeting-video-archive>. • Thanks again for taking the time to be an engaged citizen; it is so important to the process. Please feel free to call or email whenever we can be of assistance. 7 Sent by Executive Coordinator Angela Goodner on behalf of Andy Solis, Esq. Commissioner, District 2 Collier County Board of Commissioners 239.252.8602 Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone at 239.252.8602 or in writing at 3299 Tamiami Trail E,Suite 303, Naples, FL 34112. From: Cathy Miranti<cathymiranti@gmail.com> Sent:Wednesday,July 31, 2019 6:46 PM To:SolisAndy Subject:Allura apts Please do not allow these Apts to be built.The traffic is unbearable and it will make the situation unsafe. CathyMiranti 4902 ParadiseCircle Naples, FL GoodnerAngela From: Rob Conforti <conforob@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday,August 1, 2019 1:56 PM To: StrainMark; FryerEdwin; KarlFry; pdearborn@johnrwood.com; HomiakKaren; ChrzanowskiStan Cc: SolisAndy; FialaDonna;TaylorPenny; SaundersBurt; McDanielBill Subject: Allura Dear Commissioners, I was at at the meeting this morning but was unable to stay past the lunch break to speak about the issue being considered. I have some concerns that I don't feel are being addressed by the presentations of the Stock team nor the staff recommendations. I'll be brief: The hypothetical formulas used for traffic studies appear to be flawed in that they assume"normal"traffic patterns and flow. Please keep in mind that as of now,Veterans Memorial is dead ended going both east and west. I understand it will extend in the future to the west to Old 41. In any case,typical traffic from the intersection of Livingston and Veterans Memorial will be going either north or south. There are no options to"divert"when traffic is blocked. In edition,the scenarios did not take into account new construction in Tallis Park,The Enclave(north of Veteran's),the proposed high school and Oaks Farm. Even without this development,travel time from Veteran's Memorial to Bonita Beach road is at least 30 minutes in peak traffic times. Adding the number of vehicles discussed today would significantly increase this congestion. This is based on fact. I've timed it several times. It is not based on formulaic projections (consultant) nor observation from a control room (Staff member). Their hired consultant is paid to provide an answer that benefits the applicant, not Collier County nor the surrounding neighborhoods. In addition to this congestion, it was noted today that links east and west of 175 on Immokalee Rd are over capacity. Considering that traffic from this development must go north or south,we can reasonably expect those links to be even more stressed. Comparing this development to other similar developments is not a valid comparison. They referenced Pine Ridge and 41 as an area able to take the increased density. That is a totally different area with completely different traffic flow,therefor not a valid comparison. It is also important to note Livingston Rd reduces from 3 to 2 lanes north of Veteran's Memorial. There is no control over Lee County traffic and roadway expansion. In addition,the discussion of future Collier Area Transit service is of no help. Collier Country ends less than one mile north of Veteran's Memorial. There is no county public transit relief going north from this location. On a different note,there are thousands of homes/families in the is area. Buyers of those homes researched the areas prior to purchase. Zoning was set at that time. Now there is a proposal to change zoning after the existing neighborhoods were sold. Stock bought this property with the current zoning. It is unreasonable for the existing families to adjust when they did their research. Stock knew what they were buying. They should not get special treatment. In their presentation,Stock representatives described the typical renter of these"luxury"apartments but then seem to insulate the benefit of offering lower income options to accommodate area employers. They can't have it both ways. The fact is,they see an opportunity and a market for these apartments no matter the impact to the surrounding neighborhoods. Thanks for your time and effort in this matter. I urge to to deny the applicant's request. Sincerely, Rob Conforti,SPHR, HCS President/CEO 312.909.8664 conforob@gmail.com leadershiplaunchconsulting.com GoodnerAngela From: Cathy Miranti <cathymiranti@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday,July 31, 2019 6:47 PM To: SolisAndy Subject: Allura apts Please do not allow these Apts to be built.The traffic is unbearable and it will make the situation unsafe. CathyMiranti 4902 ParadiseCircle Naples, FL GoodnerAngela From: Harriet Spirer <ehspirer@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday,July 31,2019 11:03 AM To: SolisAndy Subject: Allure Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed Please don't ruin our neighborhood. Who does Stock development have in their pockets.That corner was not supposed to be apartments.Just some houses. I think it has been made perfectly clear that the developments around Veterans Memorial Drive and that part of Livingston are against that kind of buildings Sent from my iPhone GoodnerAngela From: Patti Coffin <patticoffin@comcast.net> Sent: Monday,July 29, 2019 8:57 AM To: SolisAndy Subject: Re: Allure Just because a prior judgement was made unsoundly does not make this right. If anything the communities developed since should have significant bearing on the new proposal. Two wrongs as they say. Sent from Patti's iPhone7 On Jul 29, 2019, at 8:34 AM, SolisAndy<Andy.Solis@colliercountyfl.gov>wrote: Hello, Ms. Coffin: Thank you for sharing your thoughts on the proposed Allura project. We know that it takes time and effort to be an active member of the community;your willingness to be involved is appreciated. While the volume of emails received at the District 2 office is too great for Commissioner Solis to reply individually, he reviews each one and may reach out to you to gather more information if it seems appropriate. Know that even if he does not contact you again,your voice has been heard. If you were not able to attend or watch any of the earlier hearings at which this project was discussed, you can see the March Board of County Commissioners (BCC) discussion HERE. Watching this discussion can provide helpful information to those who aren't yet aware that about half the land included in the Allura proposal is already zoned for 4-story apartments, and has been since 2007, in a PUD called Della Rosa. Although it comes as a surprise to many neighbors, apartments were planned there before most of the surrounding homes were built. Allura is proposed as an alternative to that earlier PUD by the new property owner, but the Della Rosa apartments were approved by prior County Commissioners and nothing can be done now to prevent them from being built. You may have heard that the hearing before the Planning Commission was continued last week. In case you weren't aware,the adoption hearings for the Growth Management Plan Amendment and the companion PUD amendment for Allura are currently scheduled for the following dates: August 1, 2019—Planning Commission September 24, 2019—Board of County Commissioners These meetings will be held at the government complex at 3299 Tamiami Trail East-- marked 'County Admin' on this map-- beginning at 9am. You are invited to attend, or you can watch it live online, or on local cable channel 97. Shortly following the meeting,the video will be available to watch on demand. Thanks again for taking the time to be an engaged citizen; it is so important to the process. Please feel free to call or email whenever we can be of assistance. Sent on behalf of Commissioner Solis by Angela Goodner, Executive Coordinator Andy Solis, Esq., District 2 Commissioner Collier County Board of County Commissioners Phone: 239.252.8602 Fax: 239.252.6947 Sign up for the District 2 newsletter HERE! Under Florida Law,e-mail addresses are public records.If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request,do not send electronic mail to this entity.Instead, contact this office by telephone at 239-252-8602 or in writing at 3299 Tamiami Trail E,Suite 303,Naples, FL 34112. Original Message From: Patti Coffin<patticoffin@comcast.net> Sent: Saturday,July 27, 2019 12:39 PM To:SolisAndy<Andy.Solis@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject:Allure This is wrong on so many levels!!! ADDED TRAFFIC CONGESTION,SCHOOL OVER CROWDING, INTRODUCING TRANSIENTS WITH NO PRIDE OF OWNERSHIP TO AN UPSCALE GATED COMMUNITY, INCREASE DRAG ON UTILITIES(MAINLY WATER), and did I mention TRAFFICI I I I I I And,of no small importance, decreasing the value of every neighboring community. These are exactly the kind of places drug sellers and pedophiles look for. "luxury" apartments my backside,these are very small apartments,that will increase the traffic, in most cases by two cars per unit. Those of us in Mediterra and neighboring communities live the nightmare of trying to go in and out of our gates during morning and evening rush hours already!!!! Please make a sensible decision on behalf of the people who afford you your office. We do not want this project! It should be single family dwellings, period!!!! Thank you Sent from Patti's iPhone7 GoodnerAngela From: Eddie DePuye <depuye7@gmail.com> Sent: Sunday,July 28,2019 10:30 AM To: StrainMark; FryerEdwin; KarlFry; pdearborn@johnrwood.com; HomiakKaren; ChrzanowskiStan; SolisAndy; FialaDonna;TaylorPenny; SaundersBurt; McDanielBill Subject: Allura Apartments Project Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed Dear Sir/Madam, In regards to the housing project of Allura Apartments: "This is wrong on so many levels!!! ADDED TRAFFIC CONGESTION, SCHOOL OVER CROWDING, INTRODUCING TRANSIENTS WITH NO PRIDE OF OWNERSHIP TO AN UPSCALE GATED COMMUNITY, INCREASE DRAG ON UTILITIES (MAINLY WATER), and did I mention TRAFFICIIIIII And, of no small importance, decreasing the value of every neighboring community. These are exactly the kind of places drug sellers and pedophiles look for. "luxury" apartments my backside, these are very small apartments, that will increase the traffic, in most cases by two cars per unit. Those of us in Four Seasons and neighboring communities live the nightmare of trying to go in and out of our subdivisions during morning and evening rush hours already!!!! Please make a sensible decision on behalf of the people who afford you your office. We do not want this project! It should be single family dwellings, period!!!! Thank you Respectfully Eddie DePuye Sent from my iPhone GoodnerAngela From: Patti Coffin <patticoffin@comcast.net> Sent: Saturday,July 27, 2019 12:39 PM To: SolisAndy Subject: Allure Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed This is wrong on so many levels!!! ADDED TRAFFIC CONGESTION, SCHOOL OVER CROWDING, INTRODUCING TRANSIENTS WITH NO PRIDE OF OWNERSHIP TO AN UPSCALE GATED COMMUNITY, INCREASE DRAG ON UTILITIES (MAINLY WATER), and did I mention TRAFFIC!'"" And, of no small importance, decreasing the value of every neighboring community. These are exactly the kind of places drug sellers and pedophiles look for. "luxury" apartments my backside,these are very small apartments,that will increase the traffic, in most cases by two cars per unit. Those of us in Mediterra and neighboring communities live the nightmare of trying to go in and out of our gates during morning and evening rush hours already!!!! Please make a sensible decision on behalf of the people who afford you your office. We do not want this project! It should be single family dwellings, period!!!! Thank you Sent from Patti's iPhone7 GoodnerAngela From: Ivan L. Rosenblatt <ilrosenblatt@earthlink.net> Sent: Monday,July 22,2019 8:55 PM To: SolisAndy Subject: RE: Objection to Allura Project Ms. Goodner, I neglected to mention in my last note that Della Rosa PUD was approved in 2007 well before Barrington Cove was even started so I do understand that issue. I reiterate the following: 1. We do not need this kind of development as it is incompatible with the surrounding area. 2. If Stock wants to build on Della Rosa more power to them but I contend that they haven't done so because it is uneconomical for them. This development is ill conceived and if the Commissioners want to help them and work against their constituents best interests they should know that this project will be opposed in the strongest possible way and we the residents in the area will not quit until this is defeated. If the commissioners want to approve development in that area they should first consider methods to improve the devastating traffic conditions and should focus on development that is compatible with the area. Allura is totally incompatible. Regards, Ivan Rosenblatt—The Strand From:SolisAndy<Andy.Solis@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Monday,July 22, 2019 6:09 PM To: Ivan L. Rosenblatt<ilrosenblatt@earthlink.net> Subject: RE:Objection to Allura Project Hello, Mr. Rosenblatt: I just wanted to let you know that the hearing on this item before the Planning Commission was continued to August 1, same time,same opportunities to view online, etc. At this time, it appears that it will still be on the September 24 agenda for the BCC, but we will let everyone know if that changes. My role is just to share information, not to argue for or against or point-by-point on any proposal. In that spirit, I can share a couple of pieces of information from the research I did for the Commissioner on this project: To help you out with your question of whether the 2007 approval for Della Rosa went through the proper channels-- the Neighborhood Information Meeting was held on 3/12/07;the public hearing before the Planning Commission was held on 9/20/07 where it was approved 9-0;the public hearing before the Board of County Commissioners was held on 11/13/07 where it was approved 5-0. All proper notices were given in each case, members of the public attended each of the meetings, it's just that most of the land surrounding the PUD was vacant at the time. The Della Rosa PUD was just acquired by Stock Development in July of 2018. They own that property outright, but a lot of the other property within the proposed Allura boundary is owned by other individuals or trusts;this application is being pursued by agreement among all the property owners. I believe that the fact that Stock outright purchased that parcel rather than coordinating with the prior owners,as they are doing with the other parcels, combined with their recent expressed interest in building apartments in response to market demand, is why the Commissioner fears they will build the existing,approved, much less luxurious apartment complex if this petition fails, and that the rest of the parcels will be developed piecemeal, rather than cohesively. Again,Stock could begin that project immediately,without any further review other than permit inspections. Finally, I apologize for apparently being confusing.When I was talking about the size of Della Rosa relative to the proposed Allura project, I was referring to acreage. Della Rosa is 15.38 acres, zoned at 7 units/acre, plus a 5 acre preserve. Allura is proposed to be 35.57 acres at 8.55 units/acre, with a little more than 18 acres in lake and preserve. Hope all that information is helpful, and thanks again for your involvement in the community! Angela Goodner, Executive Coordinator Andy Solis, Esq., District 2 Commissioner Collier County Board of County Commissioners Phone: 239.252.8602 Fax: 239.252.6947 Sign up for the District 2 newsletter HERE! Under Florida Law,e-mail addresses are public records.If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request,do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead,contact this office by telephone at 239-252-8602 or in writing at 3299 Tamiami Trail E,Suite 303, Naples, FL 34112. From: Ivan L. Rosenblatt<ilrosenblatt@earthlink.net> Sent:Wednesday,July 17,2019 8:00 PM To:SolisAndy<Andv.Solis@colliercountvfl.gov> Subject: RE:Objection to Allura Project Ms. Goodner, Thank you for your prompt response to my submittal to Commissioner Solis. However, as I read your response on his behalf below it does not appear that you are responding to the points I brought out in my letter. Let me put forth some points below and hopefully you and Commissioner Solis will have a better understanding of my profound objections: 1. As I read your response below it does not address any of the points in my letter. 2. I was in attendance at all of the Planning commission meetings dealing with this project as well as all of the prior County Commissioner meetings dealing with this project and came away from particularly the County Commissioner Meeting with the distinct impression that there was a significant attempt on the part of most of the Commissioners to steamroll this project to approval over the significant objections of the community. 3. We were made aware of the Della Rosa PUD which had been approved approximately 10 to 12 years ago and to correct your statement the size of that PUD was significantly less than half the size of the current proposed Allura project. In fact, if I am not mistaken it only included space for approximately 100 to 110 units which is 1/3 of what is currently being proposed. None of the current residents were aware of the Della Rosa PUD until we were informed of it in the Planning Commission meetings. One could wonder if it was run through the system without proper notification of the community and possibly could be challenged on that basis alone. 4. However, if Stock would utilize Della Rosa PUD alone if Allura is not approved my response is let them proceed. My feeling is that if Della Rosa was cost effective,they would have already started that development and would only be asking for the ability to expand it in the future. As I have pointed out above, I seriously question whether Della Rosa PUD was approved providing proper notice to the surrounding community and could be challenged on that basis alone. I am currently in the North for the summer and will be unable to attend the subsequent meetings you indicated in person but I will be kept aware and will continue to provide my input going forward. I strongly suggest you read what I submitted more carefully and then you may better understand why the Allura project is a non-starter for the surrounding community. I suggest that Commissioner Solis understand and act in a manner that makes it clear that he represents his constituents and not the developer. I would hope that he acts in the best interests of the community and not the developer. Regards, Ivan Rosenblatt—The Strand From:SolisAndy<Andy.Solis@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent:Wednesday,July 17, 2019 6:29 PM To: Ivan L. Rosenblatt<ilrosenblatt@earthlink.net> Subject: RE:Objection to Allura Project Hello, Mr. Rosenblatt: Thank you for sharing your thoughts on the proposed Allura project. We know that it takes time and effort to be an active member of the community;your willingness to be involved is appreciated. While the volume of emails received at the District 2 office is too great for Commissioner Solis to reply individually, he reviews each one and may reach out to you to gather more information if it seems appropriate. Know that even if he does not contact you again,your voice has been heard. If you were not able to attend or watch any of the earlier hearings at which this project was discussed,you can see the March Board of County Commissioners (BCC)discussion HERE. Watching this discussion can be helpful to those who aren't yet aware that about half the land included in the Allura proposal is already zoned for 4-story apartments, and has been since 2007, in a PUD called Della Rosa. It seems to come as a surprise to many neighbors, but apartments were planned as part of the residential mix there since before most of the surrounding homes were built. Those apartments were approved by prior County Commissioners, and nothing can be done now to prevent them from being built. Allura is proposed as an alternative to that earlier PUD, but the developer has indicated they will build under the older plan if it doesn't pass. In case you weren't aware,the adoption hearings for the Growth Management Plan Amendment and the companion PUD amendment for Allura are currently scheduled for the following dates: July 18,2019—Planning Commission September 24, 2019—Board of County Commissioners These meetings will be held at the government complex at 3299 Tamiami Trail East--marked 'County Admin' on this map--beginning at 9am. You are invited to attend, or you can watch it live online,or on local cable channel 97. Shortly following the meeting,the video will be available to watch on demand. Thanks again for taking the time to be an engaged citizen; it is so important to the process. Please feel free to call or email whenever we can be of assistance. Sent on behalf of Commissioner Solis by Angela Goodner, Executive Coordinator Andy Solis, Esq., District 2 Commissioner Collier County Board of County Commissioners Phone: 239.252.8602 Fax: 239.252.6947 Sign up for the District 2 newsletter HERE! Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request,do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead,contact this office by telephone at 239-252-8602 or in writing at 3299 Tamiami Trail E,Suite 303,Naples, FL 34112. From: Ivan L. Rosenblatt<ilrosenblatt@earthlink.net> Sent:Tuesday,July 16, 2019 9:20 PM To:SolisAndy<Andv.Solis@colliercountvfl.gov> Subject: Objection to Allura Project Commissioner Solis, Attached is my letter strongly objecting to the Allura Project as being incompatible to our area and strongly urge that when it comes up for a final vote that you will do your job and vote in a way that is representative of your constituent's best interests and not in the interest of a real estate developer such as Stock who has proposed a project that is incompatible to our area and contrary to the best interests of your constituents and Collier County as a whole. Ivan Rosenblatt—The Strand GoodnerAngela From: Tim Diegel <timdiegel@mac.com> Sent: Friday,July 19, 2019 9:41 PM To: SolisAndy Subject: Allura cancellation Dear Commissioner Solis,As you know Stock had cancelled their participation in the July 18th meeting at very short notice.This mirrors exactly what happened the day before the first scheduled meeting for the Barrington Cove/Mediterra with the Stock representatives.The residents prepare to come to the meetings, notices go out, schedules are changed,time off of work is arranged and then at the last minute,day of or night before,Stock cancels. It is very disingenuous for Stock to cancel out on these meetings which are held to give residents of the community an opportunity to voice their concerns. Now during the off season a few residents had plane reservations to fly in for the meeting and actually did a day before the scheduled meeting.They arrived to find the meeting cancelled.What happens in this instance is a version of Aesop's fable"The Boy Who Cried Wolf".The Home Owners Association encourages residents to come to voice their concerns and tells them that their presence matters and that the commissioners pay attention when residents attend.The residents show up like the villagers in the fable and when they find it is a "false alarm"they are discouraged and go home. As in the story,the third time a "meeting" is called,there are very few residents who make the effort to attend because they do not trust that the developers will show up and they assume that it will be canceled again. Again,just like the fable,this is the meeting the developer does show up for. At this point, the commissioners are being duped also, because they see an empty hall and assume that this reflects a lack of opposition to the developer's project which could not be farther from the truth. Stock has a lot of experience with homeowners associations and know the tactics that work to damp down the dissenting voices. This delay/cancel tactic is used by Stock to progressively and systematically reduce the number of residents that will show up at the subsequent meeting.When the meeting is finally held the commissioners see and hear from the very few residents who are able to make the that meeting. In addition,the ease that comisioners agree for a rescheduled meeting gives the perception that the system is set up to favor the developer and the process is tilted toward Stock Development which is blatantly unfair. Hopefully,Commissioner Solis,you will recall the meeting room was filled to capacity with red shirts and a long list of speakers that had real and valid concerns at the February 7th meeting. They were confident that after hearing the issues of neighborhood Incompatibility, the loss of Quality of Life for our residents based on the increase of air, noise and light pollution and the Traffic Safety Issues related to the high density, that the commissioners would vote NO to Allura. Please reconsider you vote against Allura which adds so many negatives. We don't need more luxury apartments but more mid-level houses for the employers in the area. Thank you for reconsidering your vote. Tim Diegel, Barrington Cove. GoodnerAngela From: Robert Cherry <rdcherry09@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday,July 18,2019 2:09 PM To: SolisAndy Subject: Allura Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed Please take note of our objection to the Allura project now being considered. Not only is it a serious detriment to our community at The Strand, it also sets a dangerous precedent for future high density projects in Collier County.The traffic conditions on Livingston Road are already very busy. Late afternoon traffic can sometimes be backed up from Bonita Beach Road to Veterans Memorial Blvd.There are numerous residential communities as well as several school all vying for the same roadway. Please vote NO to the current development plans for the Allura site. Sincerely, Robert&Marsha Cherry 6061 Ashford Lane Unit 503 Naples GoodnerAngela From: Ivan L. Rosenblatt <ilrosenblatt@earthlink.net> Sent: Wednesday,July 17, 2019 8:00 PM To: SolisAndy Subject: RE: Objection to Allura Project Ms. Goodner, Thank you for your prompt response to my submittal to Commissioner Solis. However,as I read your response on his behalf below it does not appear that you are responding to the points I brought out in my letter. Let me put forth some points below and hopefully you and Commissioner Solis will have a better understanding of my profound objections: 1. As I read your response below it does not address any of the points in my letter. 2. I was in attendance at all of the Planning commission meetings dealing with this project as well as all of the prior County Commissioner meetings dealing with this project and came away from particularly the County Commissioner Meeting with the distinct impression that there was a significant attempt on the part of most of the Commissioners to steamroll this project to approval over the significant objections of the community. 3. We were made aware of the Della Rosa PUD which had been approved approximately 10 to 12 years ago and to correct your statement the size of that PUD was significantly less than half the size of the current proposed Allura project. In fact, if I am not mistaken it only included space for approximately 100 to 110 units which is 1/3 of what is currently being proposed. None of the current residents were aware of the Della Rosa PUD until we were informed of it in the Planning Commission meetings. One could wonder if it was run through the system without proper notification of the community and possibly could be challenged on that basis alone. 4. However, if Stock would utilize Della Rosa PUD alone if Allura is not approved my response is let them proceed. My feeling is that if Della Rosa was cost effective,they would have already started that development and would only be asking for the ability to expand it in the future. As I have pointed out above, I seriously question whether Della Rosa PUD was approved providing proper notice to the surrounding community and could be challenged on that basis alone. I am currently in the North for the summer and will be unable to attend the subsequent meetings you indicated in person but I will be kept aware and will continue to provide my input going forward. I strongly suggest you read what I submitted more carefully and then you may better understand why the Allura project is a non-starter for the surrounding community. I suggest that Commissioner Solis understand and act in a manner that makes it clear that he represents his constituents and not the developer. I would hope that he acts in the best interests of the community and not the developer. Regards, Ivan Rosenblatt—The Strand From:SolisAndy<Andy.Solis@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent:Wednesday,July 17,2019 6:29 PM To: Ivan L. Rosenblatt<ilrosenblatt@earthlink.net> Subject: RE:Objection to Allura Project Hello, Mr. Rosenblatt: Thank you for sharing your thoughts on the proposed Allura project. We know that it takes time and effort to be an active member of the community;your willingness to be involved is appreciated. While the volume of emails received at the District 2 office is too great for Commissioner Solis to reply individually, he reviews each one and may reach out to you to gather more information if it seems appropriate. Know that even if he does not contact you again,your voice has been heard. If you were not able to attend or watch any of the earlier hearings at which this project was discussed,you can see the March Board of County Commissioners (BCC)discussion HERE. Watching this discussion can be helpful to those who aren't yet aware that about half the land included in the Allura proposal is already zoned for 4-story apartments,and has been since 2007, in a PUD called Della Rosa. It seems to come as a surprise to many neighbors, but apartments were planned as part of the residential mix there since before most of the surrounding homes were built. Those apartments were approved by prior County Commissioners,and nothing can be done now to prevent them from being built. Allura is proposed as an alternative to that earlier PUD, but the developer has indicated they will build under the older plan if it doesn't pass. In case you weren't aware,the adoption hearings for the Growth Management Plan Amendment and the companion PUD amendment for Allura are currently scheduled for the following dates: July 18, 2019—Planning Commission September 24, 2019—Board of County Commissioners These meetings will be held at the government complex at 3299 Tamiami Trail East--marked 'County Admin'on this map--beginning at 9am. You are invited to attend,or you can watch it live online,or on local cable channel 97. Shortly following the meeting,the video will be available to watch on demand. Thanks again for taking the time to be an engaged citizen; it is so important to the process. Please feel free to call or email whenever we can be of assistance. Sent on behalf of Commissioner Solis by Angela Goodner, Executive Coordinator Andy Solis, Esq., District 2 Commissioner Collier County Board of County Commissioners Phone: 239.252.8602 Fax: 239.252.6947 Sign up for the District 2 newsletter HERE! Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request,do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead,contact this office by telephone at 239-252-8602 or in writing at 3299 Tamiami Trail E,Suite 303,Naples, FL 34112. From: Ivan L. Rosenblatt<ilrosenblatt@earthlink.net> Sent:Tuesday,July 16, 2019 9:20 PM To:SolisAndy<Andy.Solis@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Objection to Allura Project Commissioner Solis, Attached is my letter strongly objecting to the Allura Project as being incompatible to our area and strongly urge that when it comes up for a final vote that you will do your job and vote in a way that is representative of your constituent's best interests and not in the interest of a real estate developer such as Stock who has proposed a project that is incompatible to our area and contrary to the best interests of your constituents and Collier County as a whole. Ivan Rosenblatt—The Strand GoodnerAngela From: Madeleine Gunderson <madeleine.gunderson@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday,July 17, 2019 12:31 PM To: SolisAndy Cc: Ben Gunderson Subject: STOP Allura Project Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed I live at The Strand near the proposed Allura Project and am very concerned about the negative impact building a huge apartment complex will have at this location. Livingston Road & Veteran's Memorial Parkway cannot handle the additional increase in traffic, quality of life and environmental issues this Project will bring. As it is, the traffic on Livingston Road already backs up from Veterans Memorial Parkway to Bonita Beach Rd every rush hour. The proposed Allura apartment complex will cause an already intolerable situation to become even worst. In addition, buildings at this site does not fit the neighborhood private residential environment. This massive complex DOES NOT FIT! Unfortunately, the land was incorrectly zoned and is being taken advantage of by Stock Development. Times have changed since the 2007 zoning approval.. Don't ruin beautiful North Naples by approving the Allura Project. I strongly ask that you vote against this proposed project. If this project goes through don't expect my vote come next election. Sincerely, Madeleine Gunderson Florida and Collier County Resident GoodnerAngela From: Ben Gunderson <gunderson.ben@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday,July 17, 2019 12:16 PM To: SolisAndy Cc: Madeleine Gunderson Subject: Vote NO on Allura Project Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed Please oppose the Allura Project! I have testified for the record at previous hearings against this project, in total. My wife and I live at The Strand, are Florida full time residents and vote. Thanks in advance for your support GoodnerAngela From: Ivan L. Rosenblatt <ilrosenblatt@earthlink.net> Sent: Tuesday,July 16, 2019 9:20 PM To: SolisAndy Subject: Objection to Allura Project Attachments: Letter Against Allura Project.pdf Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed Commissioner Solis, Attached is my letter strongly objecting to the Allura Project as being incompatible to our area and strongly urge that when it comes up for a final vote that you will do your job and vote in a way that is representative of your constituent's best interests and not in the interest of a real estate developer such as Stock who has proposed a project that is incompatible to our area and contrary to the best interests of your constituents and Collier County as a whole. Ivan Rosenblatt—The Strand GoodnerAngela From: David Ortbals <dwomjo@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday,July 16, 2019 1:46 PM To: SolisAndy Subject: Re: Allura Apartment Project Dear Ms. Goodner: Thank you for your prompt and very professional response to my email. I obviously was in error as I thought the meeting this week was the Board and not the Planning Commission so I apologize for my premature request. I was aware of the Della Rosa PUD, as I believe most of the nearby residents are. Obviously this was approved before almost all of the surrounding neighborhoods were built. However there would be no way that Stock could make this project financially feasible without the addition of the adjacent parcel. Essentially Stock told us at the meeting that if their project was not approved they would simple proceed with the Della Rosa PUD, which I believe was an unrealistic threat. This land should be single family homes or villas and not an apartment complex with all of the attendant noise,traffic, and other concerns. Thank you again. David W. Ortbals, MD On Tue,Jul 16,2019 at 12:33 PM David Ortbals<dwomjo@gmail.com>wrote: Forwarded message From:SolisAndy<Andy.Solis@colliercountvfl.gov> Date:Tue,Jul 16, 2019 at 12:19 PM Subject: RE:Allura Apartment Project To: David Ortbals<dwomjo@gmail.com> Thank you for sharing your thoughts on the proposed Allura project. We know that it takes time and effort to be an active member of the community;your willingness to be involved is appreciated. While the volume of emails received at the District 2 office is too great for Commissioner Solis to reply individually, he reviews each one and may reach out to you to gather more information if it seems appropriate. Know that even if he does not contact you again,your voice has been heard. If you were not able to attend or watch any of the earlier hearings at which this project was discussed, you can see the March Board of County Commissioners (BCC) discussion HERE. Watching this discussion can be helpful to those who aren't yet aware that about half the land included in the Allura proposal is already zoned for 4-story apartments, and has been since 2007, in a PUD called Della Rosa. It seems to come as a surprise to many neighbors, but apartments were planned there before most of the surrounding homes were built. Those apartments were approved by prior County Commissioners and nothing can be done now to prevent them from being built;Allura is an alternative to that earlier PUD. tee. In case you weren't aware,the adoption hearings for the Growth Management Plan Amendment and the companion PUD amendment for Allura are currently scheduled for the following dates: July 18, 2019—Planning Commission September 24, 2019—Board of County Commissioners These meetings will be held at the government complex at 3299 Tamiami Trail East--marked 'County Admin'on this map-- beginning at 9am. You are invited to attend,or you can watch it live online,or on local cable channel 97. Shortly following the meeting,the video will be available to watch on demand. Thanks again for taking the time to be an engaged citizen; it is so important to the process. Please feel free to call or email whenever we can be of assistance. Sent on behalf of Commissioner Solis by Angela Goodner, Executive Coordinator Andy Solis, Esq., District 2 Commissioner Collier County Board of County Commissioners Phone: 239.252.8602 Fax: 239.252.6947 Sign up for the District 2 newsletter HERE! Under Florida Law,e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request,do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead,contact this office by telephone at 239-252-8602 or in writing at 3299 Tamiami Trail E,Suite 303,Naples,FL 34112. I From: David Ortbals<dwomio@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday,July 16, 2019 11:49 AM 1111111111111111MN. To:SolisAndy<Andv.Solis@colliercountvfl.gov> Subject:Allura Apartment Project Dear Mr. Solis: As you may recalls, I sent you a copy of my presentation to the Collier County Planning Commission in February of 2019, prior to the County Council vote on the Stock-sponsored Allura Apartment Project. Unfortunately you decided to vote in favor of the proposal,despite the fact that NONE of your constituents were in favor of this inappropriately-located development. At subsequent meetings of the Planning Commission again NO ONE spoke in support of the Allura project except for individuals on retainer from Stock.As you know,the next vote is scheduled for this Thursday, and due to summer vacations and similar activities I am sure the attendance from the local residents will not be as great as it would be in "season". Despite this the opposition remains 100%united against this project, and I am asking you to please consider your constituency first and foremost before casting your vote. The residents of the Strand, Barrington Cove, Mediterra and the other neighboring communities deserve your consideration and support. This is strictly a financial issue for Stock,and since they have become a monolith their consideration for others impacted by their decisions has vanished. Thank you for your consideration. I can be reached at 636-346-4099 or by text or email if you wish to discuss this matter with me. David W. Ortbals, MD Jane Ortbals, RN GoodnerAngela From: Rochelle Dowling <rsdd6@optimum.net> Sent: Tuesday,July 16, 2019 1:24 PM To: SolisAndy Subject: ALLURA PROJECT HEARING WEDNESDAY,JULY 18,2019 Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed Dear Commissioner Solis, I am a resident/owner of Clubside in the Strand. I am TOTALLY AGAINST the rezoning change amending Ordinance 89-05 specifically adding the Livingston Road/Veterans Memorial Boulevard East residential subdistrict to urban mixed use district to allow the ALLURA RPUD to build a huge rental apartment complex. I also resent that such an important matter to the residents is set for Wednesday,July 18 in the heat of summer when so many residents are not here or not even aware of such an important matter.To hold this type of hearing in summer when people are away is not allowed on Long Island, New York. By allowing this zoning change, a complex of this size drastically alters the quality of life for residents of the Strand and the surrounding homes. There are no buildings only homes in this area. This complex will result in huge traffic jams in an area servicing schools and many private homes. The size of the projected project will result in many children who rent the apartments flooding our schools resulting in overcrowding and affecting the education of our children. Our emergency and fire vehicles will have trouble reaching us in a timely manner because of the traffic,especially at certain times. Also I fear for our water and sewer capacities and garbage disposal which will be compromised and diminished in order to service this huge complex. Our Commissioners are bound by the Oath of Office they took to uphold their fiduciary duty to protect the needs of their constituents and not to bow to the needs of developers. They should remember it is the votes of their residents who get them elected. I respectfully ask that you,Commissioner Solis,who represent our district vote NO on this ALLURA project. Sincerely, Rochelle Dowling 5917 Three Iron Drive#2701, Naples, FL GoodnerAngela From: David Ortbals <dwomjo@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday,July 16, 2019 11:49 AM To: SolisAndy Subject: Allura Apartment Project Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed Dear Mr. Solis: As you may recalls, I sent you a copy of my presentation to the Collier County Planning Commission in February of 2019, prior to the County Council vote on the Stock-sponsored Allura Apartment Project. Unfortunately you decided to vote in favor of the proposal, despite the fact that NONE of your constituents were in favor of this inappropriately-located development. At subsequent meetings of the Planning Commission again NO ONE spoke in support of the Allura project except for individuals on retainer from Stock.As you know,the next vote is scheduled for this Thursday,and due to summer vacations and similar activities I am sure the attendance from the local residents will not be as great as it would be in "season". Despite this the opposition remains 100%united against this project, and I am asking you to please consider your constituency first and foremost before casting your vote. The residents of the Strand, Barrington Cove, Mediterra and the other neighboring communities deserve your consideration and support. This is strictly a financial issue for Stock, and since they have become a monolith their consideration for others impacted by their decisions has vanished. Thank you for your consideration. I can be reached at 636-346-4099 or by text or email if you wish to discuss this matter with me. David W. Ortbals, MD Jane Ortbals, RN GoodnerAngela From: Rochelle Dowling <rsdd6@optimum.net> Sent: Monday,July 15,2019 5:20 PM To: SolisAndy Subject: ALLURA PROJECT HEARING WEDNESDAY,JULY 18,2019 Dear Commissioner Solis, I am a resident/owner of Clubside in the Strand. I am TOTALLY AGAINST the rezoning change amending Ordinance 89-05 specifically adding the Livingston Road/Veterans Memorial Boulevard East residential subdistrict to urban mixed use district to allow the ALLURA RPUD to build a huge rental apartment complex. I also resent that such an important matter to the residents is set for Wednesday,July 18 in the heat of summer when so many residents are not here or not even aware of such an important matter.To hold this type of hearing in summer when people are away is not allowed on Long Island, New York. By allowing this zoning change, a complex of this size drastically alters the quality of life for residents of the Strand and the surrounding homes. There are no buildings only homes in this area. This complex will result in huge traffic jams in an area servicing schools and many private homes. The size of the projected project will result in many children who rent the apartments flooding our schools resulting in overcrowding and affecting the education of our children. Our emergency and fire vehicles will have trouble reaching us in a timely manner because of the traffic,especially at certain times. Also I fear for our water and sewer capacities and garbage disposal which will be compromised and diminished in order to service this huge complex. Our Commissioners are bound by the Oath of Office they took to uphold their fiduciary duty to protect the needs of their constituents and not to bow to the needs of developers. They should remember it is the votes of their residents who get them elected. I respectfully ask that you,Commissioner Solis,who represent our district vote NO on this ALLURA project. Sincerely, Rochelle Dowling 5917 Three Iron Drive#2701, Naples, FL GoodnerAngela From: Rochelle Dowling <rsdd6@optimum.net> Sent: Monday,July 15,2019 1:59 PM To: SolisAndy Subject: ALLURA PROJECT HEARING WEDNESDAY,JUL7 18,2019 I am a resident/owner of Clubside in the Strand. I am TOTALLY AGAINST allowing a zoning change amending Ordinance 89-05 specifically adding the Livingston Road/Veterans Memorial Boulevard East residential subdistrict to urban mixed use district to allow the Allura RPUD to build a huge rental apartment complex. I also resent that such an important matter is set for Wednesday,July 18 in the heat of summer when many residents are not here or not aware of this IMPORTANT MATTER. This type of hearing is NOT ALLOWED IN SUMMER when people are away up in Long Island, New York. By allowing this zoning change a complex of this size will alter the quality of life for residents of The Strand and the surrounding areas. It will result in huge traffic jams in an area servicing schools and many complexes of homes. The size of the projected complex will result in many children who rent apartments there flooding our schools and affecting the education of our children. Our emergency and fire vehicles will have trouble reaching us in a timely matter because of traffic especially at certain times. Also, I fear for our water and sewer supplies and also garbage disposal which will be compromised and diminished in order to service this huge complex. Our Commissioners are bound by the Oath Of Office they took to uphold their fiduciary duty to protect the needs of their constituents and not to bow to the needs of developers. They should remember it is the votes of their people who elect them not the developers, etc. I respectfully ask that you,Commissioner Solis,vote NO on this Allura project. Sincerely, Rochelle Dowling Clubside 5927 Three Iron Drive#2701 Naples GoodnerAngela From: Rochelle Dowling <rsdd6@optimum.net> Sent: Monday,July 15,2019 1:54 PM To: SolisAndy Subject: ALLURA PROJECT HEARING WEDNESDAY,JUL7 18,2019 I am a resident/owner of Clubside in the Strand. I am TOTALLY AGAINST allowing a zoning change amending Ordinance 89-05 specifically adding the Livingston Road/Veterans Memorial Boulevard East residential subdistrict to urban mixed use district to allow the Allura RPUD to build a huge rental apartment complex. I also resent that such an important matter is set for Wednesday,July 18 in the heat of summer when many residents are not here or not aware of this IMPORTANT MATTER. This type of hearing is NOT ALLOWED IN SUMMER when people are away up in Long Island, New York. By allowing this zoning change a complex of this size will alter the quality of life for residents of The Strand and the surrounding areas. It will result in huge traffic jams in an area servicing schools and many complexes of homes. The size of the projected complex will result in many children who rent apartments there flooding our schools and affecting the education of our children. Our emergency and fire vehicles will have trouble reaching us in a timely matter because of traffic especially at certain times. Also, I fear for our water and sewer supplies and also garbage disposal which will be compromised and diminished in order to service this huge complex. Our Commissioners are bound by the Oath Of Office they took to uphold their fiduciary duty to protect the needs of their constituents and not to bow to the needs of developers. They should remember it is the votes of their people who elect them not the developers, etc. I respectfully ask that you,Commissioner Solis,vote NO on this Allura project. Sincerely, Rochelle Dowling Clubside 5927 Three Iron Drive#2701 Naples GoodnerAngela From: Frank <frankjperpiglia@yahoo.com> Sent: Saturday,July 13, 2019 9:50 AM To: SolisAndy Subject: AN APPEAL TO VOTE NO ON ALLURA PROJECT Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed Dear Commissioner Solis: My wife and I are writing you about the proposed ALLURA project because we, along with other owners living in the nearby communities including THE STRAND,TALIS PARK, MEDITERRA AND VASARI are worried you'll help STOCK succeed in their zest to introduce a commercial rental project into this neighborhood. Although we are but one couple, we are representative of the many many others who live here,vote here and call the North Naples area Home. And our appeal to you to vote NO to STOCK'S zoning change requests is quite simple: HOW WOULD YOU LIKE IT? HOW WOULD YOU LIKE IT IF SOMEONE CHANGED THE RULES OF THE GAME ON YOU AND OPENED UP YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD INA WAY THAT WAS NEVER INTENDED? Granting ALLURA'S zoning changes to allow an apartment project is simply unfair to existing home owners in the area and we're hopeful you'll vote NO. Sincerely, Frank&Carol Perpiglia THE STRAND t :. d ,y. s v} � ,T'_ ,'''.*-q.*-ft � �s t s h` �- i -' 4;s' " te � t - :„.-*4',.n3 s r e #',*"..-4;:',..',:e''''' dyx, A, F rye' ` fl , h y 'k` 6.1 ` -r 1 9,j �f, .` x _ .. ''` k Pik` 5 '.4-4.';',.,4 p ' '� + hY'f +' .d 3 i x �^� .fir'"4 - �:; ks`"#� _ y_2 v ' ' trgA " - �€ a *: s� .i,✓ " 3r. 1 5 Iy.�*4 yp f i, kk x a fl kia. ,,a 1 'I y • # { fir4.•1 n:, {F iv .;kms r i'f-' .vt * , 144; a v �y'.gry F e A # 4 . aka - } } A ma�yy�, �.y� y 4 Al,A i -:'Y` Jk i � z { YK k .: ,,,.;','„1,3:,:-.iviz 3 H her '.^ _ - .�, ..i � v L- *F .r GoodnerAngela From: Tim Diegel <timdiegel@mac.com> Sent: Friday,July 12, 2019 6:42 PM To: SolisAndy Subject: Win-Win-Win Instead of luxury apartments at Allure,the Commissioners should approve moderate price houses(under 500K). 1.The neighbors would get compatible construction 2. Employers (Arthrex)would get more affordable housing for a large section of employees 3. Stock will get a profitable development the Allura propertybut probably less than the apartments Over 4000 new apartments are approved now in Collier and About 500 lower rent apartments are being developed in Lee County about 2-3 miles away from Allura. TimDiegel@mac.com. 16229 Aberdeen Avenue, Barrington Cove. On Jul 12, 2019,at 11:39 AM,SolisAndy<Andv.Solis a@colliercountvfl.gov>wrote: Hello, Mr. Diegel: Thank you for sharing your thoughts on the proposed Allura project. We know that it takes time and effort to be an active member of the community;your willingness to be involved is appreciated. While the volume of emails received at the District 2 office is too great for Commissioner Solis to reply individually, he reviews each one and may reach out to you to gather more information if it seems appropriate. Know that even if he does not contact you again,your voice has been heard. If you were not able to attend or watch any of the earlier hearings at which this project was discussed, you can see the March Board of County Commissioners (BCC)discussion HERE. Watching this discussion can be helpful to those who aren't yet aware that about half the land included in the Allura proposal is already zoned for 4-story apartments, and has been since 2007, in a PUD called Della Rosa. It seems to come as a surprise to many neighbors, but apartments were planned there before most of the surrounding homes were built. Those apartments were approved by prior County Commissioners and nothing can be done now to prevent them from being built;Allura is an alternative to that earlier PUD. In case you weren't aware,the adoption hearings for the Growth Management Plan Amendment and the companion PUD amendment for Allura are currently scheduled for the following dates: July 18, 2019—Planning Commission September 24, 2019—Board of County Commissioners These meetings will be held at the government complex at 3299 Tamiami Trail East-- marked 'County Admin' on this map-- beginning at 9am. You are invited to attend, or you can watch it live online,or on local cable channel 97. Shortly following the meeting,the video will be available to watch on demand. Thanks again for taking the time to be an engaged citizen; it is so important to the process. Please feel free to call or email whenever we can be of assistance. Sent on behalf of Commissioner Solis by Angela Goodner, Executive Coordinator Andy Solis, Esq., District 2 Commissioner Collier County Board of County Commissioners Phone: 239.252.8602 Fax: 239.252.6947 Sign up for the District 2 newsletter HERE! Under Florida Law,e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request,do not send electronic mail to this entity.Instead, contact this office by telephone at 239-252-8602 or in writing at 3299 Tamiami Trail E,Suite 303,Naples,FL 34112. From:Tim Diegel<timdiegel@mac.com> Sent:Wednesday,July 10, 2019 2:09 PM To:SolisAndy<Andy.Solis@colliercountvfl.gov> Subject:ALLURA Dear Commissioner Solis, Be creative and give what the county needs instead of more luxury apartments of Allura.The County (and ARTHREX) needs affordable houses for mid-level employees.We don't need any more luxury apartments but houses under$500K. Thanks,Tim Diegel GoodnerAngela From: nicholas bilotti <nicholasmbilotti@aol.com> Sent: Friday,July 12, 2019 5:10 PM To: SolisAndy Subject: Allura Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed The Allura development just doesn't make sense to have a large apartment complex to be developed in an area that has mainly one family homes and condos in gated communities. I am asking that the developer build appropriate housing that fits into the existing communities. Again, it just doesn't make sense. Sincerely, Nicholas M. Bilotti 5967 Sandwedge Lane#105 Naples, Fl. 34110 GoodnerAngela From: Phil Gallucci <pgallucci@comcast.net> Sent: Thursday,July 11,2019 4:50 PM To: SolisAndy Subject: Allura Project by Stock Development Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed Dear Mr.Solis, I have been a Naples resident for 10 years, living at the Strand; a beautiful residential property in close proximity to the proposed Allura project. Having first hand witnessed the extremely rapid growth in this area, I am fearful that increased congestion would be the result of the 300 units planned.That corner of Livingston Road and Veterans Memorial Blvd will become an actual traffic nightmare. Please do not support this Project ! Sincerely, Philip G. Gallucci Sent from my iPhone GoodnerAngela From: Dewey Galloway <gallowaydl6@yahoo.com> Sent: Thursday,July 11, 2019 4:39 PM To: SolisAndy Subject: ALLURA HEARING JULY 18TH 2019 Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed Dear Andy Solis, Esq. We have been residents of the Strand Counry Club since 1999. We have witness the development around us and have experienced the growth activity and the effects in our neighborhoods.We strongly feel that adding 304 multi family units on 36.92 acres does not fit the area neighborhoods which is mostly single family homes and it should stay that way. We ask that you vote against the ALLURA PROJECT BY STOCK DEVOLPMENTIIIII Dewey & Marilyn Galloway 5873 Three Iron Drive unit 503 Naples, Florida 34110 GoodnerAngela From: johncullenalison@aol.com Sent: Thursday,July 11, 2019 3:23 PM To: SolisAndy; StrainMark Subject: Allura Project, corner of Veterans Blvd & Livingston Rd. Naples Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed Andy & Mark, Commissioners, Collier County, I am an elderly senior citizen, born in Brooklyn, New York, during World War II, while my father served in the US Navy in the South Pacific for the first 5 years of my life with his brothers in the Navy and Army paratrooper corps, and my mother's brothers fighting Hitler's armies in the land war in Europe, all from an immigrant family. I served in the military earning an Honorable Discharge from the US Marine Corps, worked all of my life, paid all of my bills , raised a family, provided for my elders in their twilight years and saved my pennies to retire in decency to the Strand. For myself, and others who purchased in the surrounding single-family home developments, I did so relying on the fact that any new neighboring projects would be of a like kind. Changing the adjoining land zoning to allow an apartment project is not the right thing to do to me and my neighbors as taxpayers; it is very unfair to me and my neighbors. If the land is to be developed, it should be done so within existing laws. For health reasons, I use my bicycle on Veterans Blvd. and I try to access Livingston Rd. for a ride into Lee County and back. It has helped me immensely. It seems that everyday the traffic gets heavier, forcing me to bike at dawn's early light, to avoid the danger of the heavy traffic. At certain times of the day, the traffic is at a crawl reminding me of my work days in the Bronx, New York City. More development will lead to heavier traffic. Do not permit this application to pass. If applicant wants to develop the land, the development should be done so within the present zoning requirements. John E Cullen Strand- Three Iron Drive, Naples, NY 34110. GoodnerAngela From: JAMES WELDING <shakenns@comcast.net> Sent: Thursday,July 11,2019 11:04 AM To: SolisAndy Subject: ALLURA PROJECT Follow Up Flag: Follow Up Flag Status: Completed Please redirect the project at the Veterans and Livingston intersection to an area of Naples that can handle the projected traffic flow. New High School to open soon off of Veterans. I sit at this light and see the heavy traffic at rush hour both morning and night.The PM traffic backs up from Bonita Beach Road to Veterans. Traffic study is definitely flawed and tilted toward the Developers wishes.Just come out and sit there for an hour and you can see for yourself. Please make the correct decision and we as voters will do the same. Jim and Rosemarie Welding 6035 Pinnacle Lane Naples, FL 34110 GoodnerAngela From: Robert Hayes <Rwhayescpa@aol.com> Sent: Wednesday,July 10,2019 4:28 PM To: SolisAndy Subject: Re allura project Follow Up Flag: Follow Up Flag Status: Completed Dear Mr.Solis I have written to you in the past regarding this project. I am appalled that this building proposal is still on the table. This area does not call for this type of development.Area of concern is bordering residential areas of single family homes. This project needs to end. Build a community of beautiful single family homes like the ones that have recently been built. New homeowners in other neighboring communities did not sign on for this rental development when they bought their homes. You need to stop this development.You need to do whatever it takes in your power to stop this development in north naples. You will definitely loose my vote to keep your position in upcoming election if this project is not stopped. Robert w Hayes Strand resident Sent from my iPhone GoodnerAngela From: Susie Cell Phone <susiepieky@aol.com> Sent: Wednesday,July 10,2019 4:00 PM To: SolisAndy Subject: Allure Project Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed Andy, I am very concerned about many aspects of the Allura project and strongly urge you to vote no. Sincerely, Susan Piekenbrock 5740 Grande Reserve Way Sent from my iPhone GoodnerAngela From: Anne Hayes <loft6@aol.com> Sent: Wednesday,July 10, 2019 2:33 PM To: SolisAndy Subject: Vote NO on ALLURA Attachments: next steps to oppose allura.pdf;ATT00001.txt Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed Do not vote for ALLURA,or you will lose our vote. Sincerely, Anne Hayes Resident of The Strand, Naples, FL 34110 GoodnerAngela From: Tim Diegel <timdiegel@mac.com> Sent: Wednesday,July 10,2019 2:09 PM To: SolisAndy Subject: ALLURA Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed Dear Commissioner Solis, Be creative and give what the county needs instead of more luxury apartments of Allura.The County (and ARTHREX) needs affordable houses for mid-level employees. We don't need any more luxury apartments but houses under$500K. Thanks,Tim Diegel GoodnerAngela From: Robert Sadonis <rsadonis@umich.edu> Sent: Wednesday,July 10, 2019 12:19 PM To: SolisAndy Subject: I protest zoning changes for Allura project at Livingston Rd and Veteran's Memorial Blvd Follow Up Flag: Follow Up Flag Status: Completed GoodnerAngela From: kevin mcintosh <kpmintosh@yahoo.com> Sent: Wednesday,July 10,2019 11:37 AM To: SolisAndy; FialaDonna;TaylorPenny; McDanielBill Cc: Kevin McIntosh Subject: ALLURA Proposal Attachments: Allura#2 PDF.pdf Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed Please open the attached PDF file, Thank you GoodnerAngela From: Karen Wicker <karennaplesl @me.com> Sent: Tuesday,July 9, 2019 5:17 PM To: SolisAndy Subject: Allura Project Follow Up Flag: Follow Up Flag Status: Completed Andy, I am a resident of the Strand who is deeply concerned over the proposed Allura housing project. The traffic out the front and back gates is already over capacity without 300 more units added to our neighborhood. Please vote no to the proposal. Your no vote is a yes vote for your re-election. Karen Wicker karennaplesl@mac.com GoodnerAngela From: Walter Block <justw@optonline.net> Sent: Tuesday,July 9, 2019 11:05 AM To: SolisAndy Subject: Apartment complex Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed Your vote in favor will result in a Negative vote for you. Sent from my iPhone GoodnerAngela From: Joe Mangine <joe.mangine@icloud.com> Sent: Tuesday,July 9, 2019 9:47 AM To: SolisAndy Subject: Allure Project Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed Andy Please be advised that I am totally against this project as outline. Please vote against this project. Sent from my iPad Joe Mangine (612)384-7405 Howard & Mimi Getlan 6005 Pinnacle Lane, Unit 404 -- Naples, FL 34110 --- RECI • •0-- January 9, 2019 JAN 14 2P`9 Commissioner Andy Solis 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 303 By: Naples, FL 34112 Mark Strain Collier County Hearing Commissioner 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples,FL 34104 Re: Proposed Zoning Change for"Allura" development Gentlemen, It is extremely rare for me to send a letter to my local government officials. I guess it is because on the whole, I have had no major disagreements with any actions,proposed or otherwise which they are taking. Therefore consider this letter as my strenuous objection to the re-zoning of the property to be developed by Stock Development known as Allura. { I first purchased my property in the Strand nineteen(19)years ago. There were many reasons for the purchase; however, one reason,being an attorney, was to verify the zoning in the neighborhood. It was clear to me at that time, and had continued to this time that all the property surrounding the Strand and for approximately two(2)miles in diameter was zoned for individual homes. This made my purchase at the time seem reasonable and"safe". The zoning in Collier County is, I thought,very carefully developed and enforced. Although,the area has become more developed, none of the residential tracts in the area have ever had their zoning changed from residential homes to apartments. There are many reasons to oppose this change in zoning to apartments. The number of residences proposed would basically increase by about 400%to 500%; outrageous. The traffic, since there is only one entrance and exit to the development on Veterans Parkway,would be dramatically affected and make it a dangerous road. Although money has not been put aside at this time, it is my understanding that Veterans Parkway may be developed to cross I-75. If that plan is ever developed, what would this development cause? This development will affect the value of the surrounding homes, a personal loss to the owners, but a significant tax loss to the County, as the valuations decline. There are many other reasons that at this point in time I do not have to set forward. I am out of state and will not be able to attend the scheduled meeting; however, please accept this letter as my opposition voice to the proposed zoning change. Ve trueu , fir owa d e Ian HIG/hg M/zoning opposition GoodnerAngela From: SolisAndy Sent: Thursday,January 3, 2019 12:17 PM To: Tim Diegel Cc: GoodnerAngela Subject: RE: Stock Development at Livingston and Veterans Importance: High Categories: Andy Thank you Tim for being a concerned and involved resident of Collier County. Please forward your concerns to the Planning Commission as well. They will be reviewing the application first and will make recommendations to the BCC. Happy New Year. Andy Solis, Esq., Chairman Collier County Board of County Commissioners District 2 Office: 239.252.8602 Fax: 239.252.6946 Sign up for the District 2 newsletter HERE! Under Florida Law,e-mail addresses are public records.If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request,do not send electronic mail to this office.Instead,contact us by telephone at 239-252-8602 or in writing at 3299 Tamiami Trail East,Suite 303,Naples, FL 34112. From:Tim Diegel<timdiegel@mac.com> Sent:Thursday,January 3, 2019 11:04 AM To: SolisAndy<Andy.Solis@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Stock Development at Livingston and Veterans Mr Solis, I live in Barrington Cove and write regarding the planned Stock development at Livingston and Veterans Blvd. I was set to present at the December 6th planning meeting, but as you know that meeting was cancelled. I will not be able to attend the January 17th meeting, so I present my position below. In short, the proposed high density sub-district will negatively impact those living in the settled neighborhoods along Livingston Road. This development poses significant safety risks for my family and my neighbors. Moreover, the additional traffic and noise the proposed development would bring, along with increased light pollution, will significantly decrease the quality of life in our settled community. We strongly oppose this development and ask that the current Collier County commissioners retain the zoning regime that their predecessors thoughtfully determined. The footprint of the development is not ideal due to the fact that 6 sellers of the land each had a piece. One piece actually almost bisects the Barrington Community! (See map). This actually destroys the integrity of our community. immuk Safety Concerns Most importantly, the planned development will make living in Barrington Cove more dangerous. The nearby intersection of Livingston and Veterans Blvd. is a busy one— backups are typical and congestion is heavy. Nevertheless, Livingston has been described by many as a 4 mile "race track"—there are only two stop lights along the road and most travel at 50 to 60 miles per hour along the route. The proposed development— up to 400 units—will add significant vehicles to the mix and make the area significantly more dangerous. Those leaving the development and going South on Livingston will have to cross numerous lanes of traffic and then make a left U-turn. The exit of the proposed development is almost opposite the U turn site and impossible to access if there are cars backed up from the regular left turn lane. As I'm sure you appreciate, this is a dangerous maneuver (made more so by the fast traffic on the roadway). The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has reported that left turns cause 50% of all auto crashes across the United States. The added traffic leaving the development will only add to those morbid statistics. In addition, there are three schools within 1 mile of the proposed development. The nearby intersection presents nine lanes of traffic to cross. The "pedestrian hit" risk is directly related to the number of lanes that one has to cross, and adding hundreds of cars to an already dangerous intersection—one that children cross daily as they travel to and from school—is a serious concern the commission should not overlook. Livingston is also heavily trafficked by bicycles. Florida is number 1 in bicycle accidents, and the risk posed to cyclists is something else to consider. The 59-page traffic analysis sponsored by the developer is not credible in its conclusions or its construction. It claims—unbelievably—on that there will be no new traffic issues. To reach this favorable conclusion for the developer, the report has to rely on big leaps in logic. First, it claims on page 34 that zero U-turns will occur during peak hours. Many settled communities on Livingston can only access the southbound lanes by making U- turns .To claim that no one in these communities will seek to travel south during peak hours defies logic. Every commissioner should go to any intersection along Livingston to test the report's preposterous claim. There are other obvious errors in the report. On Table 2 and Figure 2 the report states that 83 Trip Generations will exit the development during the peak hours. Because the report fails to identify the objective statistics that form the basis of this arbitrary number, I had to conduct some of my own research. I learned that the zoning for cars per unit in Jacksonville is 1.75 cars per unit. (I couldn't locate a number for Collier County.) Using that 1 .75 number for the 330 to 400 units proposed for the development, means that we can expect up to 700 cars. To propose that less than 12% of vehicles in the development will leave during "peak" hours again, defies common sense and the daily experiences of those in our community. And the intersection analysis was not even performed during "peak hours." Rather, it was conducted after the 8:25 school-start time, when traffic has significantly decreased. See page 7 in the traffic analysis report.. Apparently to try to bolster its conclusions, the report had to go outside of Collier County and use numbers from Bonita Springs as documented on pages 34 through 37 in the traffic analysis.Three of the report's pages incorporate numbers from studies based in Bonita Springs. Without a credible report that provides a credible conclusion, the council should not grant an exception to the existing zoning laws. Increased Noise, Light Pollution, and Air Pollution from increased Traffic The planned development will also greatly limit the Quality of Life their legal rights. There would be a significant loss for the residents along Livingston in their ability to use and enjoy our homes and neighborhoods. There will be an onset of noise pollution from the increased number of cars, horns, and motorcycles along Livingston (not to mention their movement in the adjoining parking lots). And additional noise from residents of the proposed development—during picnics, parties, and outside games—will be significant and will impact our residents' enjoyment while sitting on their lanais and in their pool areas, which directly face the proposed development and will be also on two adjacent sides (see map). At present, a large section of Barrington Cove faces woods and darkness. Those woods, and that darkness, would be completely destroyed by the development and its related 4- story buildings overlooking our single family homes. Our homes cannot be shielded from the additional street lights and safety lights from those high buildings, even with high landscaping. There will be a loss of the "dark skies" that is already an issue across the country with new developments. The loss of ability to observe the stars will negatively impact the children in the surrounding neighborhood with their inability to observe and become interested in the stars. My neighbors who enjoy star gazing will be devastated. (Not to mention the loss of privacy that will occur from balconies looking down upon our homes.) Finally, there can be no dispute that a large, 400-unit development will bring with it many residents and many cars. As described above, the area is already a traffic nightmare. The increased burden of driving in our community—in addition to the issues described above—outweigh the benefits of the proposed development. If you do have any time to set aside, it would be worth the trip for you and other planners and commissioners to visit INSPIRE, the Stock development at Lely off Rattlesnake Road. The first vision of it really sends the message that it is massive with long and high buildings with minimal landscaping barriers and with small open fences and no barrier walls. AND the proposal at Livingston and Veterans is LARGER by 20%. Lely is 5 buildings with 303 units compared to the proposed 6 buildings with 350 units. Accordingly, I respectfully ask that the commission abandon this ill-advised idea and preserve the status quo and the high quality of life enjoyed by those living in and around my community. Thanks, Tim Diegel timdiegel@mac.com RECEIVED-- OCT 172018 By: Dear Commissioner Solis, 14 October 2018 I am enclosing a letter to address the proposal development at the intersection of Veterans Memorial Road and Livingston Road. I sent the information in a letter format instead of an email so you will better able to read it as a pace which suits you. I became more interested in Naples government during the Greater Naples Leadership course I completed last year. This letter is not too opinionated but more based on facts and easily obtained documentation. Many of my comments are based on my background and experience. It would be a good informative experience to visit the area of interest (mainly the intersection). You will notice the congestion especially in the mornings (7:00 - 8:00 AM) now and congestion throughout the day during the day. If it is not congestion, speed is a factor of 50mph - 65mph at times. Please call if you need clarification or have questions. Thank you for your consideration of my conclusions. Tim Diegel MD, (retired USAF, COL,CFS) timdiegel@Mac.Com 952-239-0004 The Commissioners of Collier County have the responsibility to be educated in all issues when important decisions are being considered. One upcoming decision is in regard to the Stock Company for the most dense rental development in this area of North Naples. There have been discussions among the leaders of Collier County recently to determine where more density will occur in Collier County and exactly how dense it should be without decreasing the beauty, the environment, and the quality of life of the present residents. The residents adjacent and nearby to the proposed development have purchased their homes due to the high quality of life that existed with a good traffic safety record, a healthy environment of minimal air pollution and in close proximity to three schools which incidentally have almost reached their maximum enrollment. I wish to discuss significant and important negatives that are related to the proposed development at the Livingston and Veterans Memorial intersection because of the unique features at this intersection and Livingston Road itself. There is no other intersection in Naples and probably not in Collier County that would be as affected by this development in so many ways. Many have not even been considered by the developers nor my their consultants who have given limited information to the county. The most important file://Mile/id=6571367.8598229560 information is in regard to the traffic safety, increase in air pollution and the related documented health issues for the present nearby residents.The issues to consider include the following: 1 . The excessive density per acre and the resultant increase in cars and traffic all of which would be congested onto the one road of Livingston. 2. The decrease in our overall quality of life as we now enjoy, including but but not limited to minimal noise and light pollution, an enjoyable wildlife environment with birds nesting in our lakes, children walking to their schools, etc. The present residents in Barrington Cove and nearby neighborhoods assumed that there would be these features and other characteristics throughout the future years. 3. We will experience an increase in health risks from the traffic air pollution. This affects children and pregnant women substantially in lung issues. There is evidence that the pollution even causes neurological learning problems in young developing brains. (documents available). 4. In addition there will be increase risks in crashes at the left turn lane resulting in disability and deaths (all file:///.file/id=6571367.8598229560 documentation is available). This is due to the unique features of Livingston Road that will be described. I was not able to find the required number of parking spaces per apartment unit for the zoning of new construction in the city of Naples. I did, however, find the "new" zoning requirements of 2010 for the number of parking spaces required for developments in Jacksonville, FL. At that time the statistics showed that 16% of its residents did not drive.This was in 2010 before the population surge. For a one bedroom apartment, 1 .75 parking spaces were required. This passes the "logical test" since most couples have two cars but some of these units would be rented by one person. As mentioned, some owners/renters don't drive but are very few in an apartment complex. The number also probably includes guest parking. Based on this logical ratio, the proposed development above based on the same ratio and assuming 420 only 1 bedroom units, there must be 735 spaces. I didn't count the number of parking spaces on the development drawing but I understand that there is a 3 level parking ramp for the cars proposed. This requested structure confirms the huge need for the many cars that will add to the already "often congested" Livingston road in the neighborhood. file:///.file/id=6571367.8598229560 Renters are more apt to use bicycles for their commute because they rent near their place of employment. As you know, Florida has the highest rate in the nation of bicycle accidents and fatalities. This development will add to these statistics due to the unique and unsafe features of this intersection which will be described. Most likely there will be an increase in motorcycles also for the same reasons. This increase will add not only to the number of accidents but also to the noise pollution at all hours. The intersection bordering the proposed development is very unique. This is because Veterans Memorial Road doesn't go anywhere east or west to other dissipating roads. Both ends are dead ends.Therefore all traffic onto or off of Veterans will go either North or South on Livingston alone for at least 2+ miles each way before this traffic is dissipated to an east or west road. Veterans Memorial will not absorb traffic or bring it elsewhere. Veterans Memorial may be completed to the West in years or decades in the future. We should all be concerned regarding the significant increase in accidents that will occur at the left turn lane to go West on Veterans Memorial from the drivers coming North on Livingston. Many U turns will increase due to this need. There are many other U turns along Livingston which will be affected also. Few drivers file:///.file/id=6571367.8598229560 know the Florida law that states - "after a driver makes a left hand turn the driver must be in the far left hand lane in that road going in the opposite direction". This of course is the "fast lane" of the new direction traffic flow. This intersection already causes risks by observing the present skid marks in both directions. The proposed development is half way between Bonita Beach Road and Immokalee Road. This is a 4 mile stretch between these roads on Livingston Road. A driver has to travel 2 miles either way to find an east/ west road. The congested traffic will be stopped longer during the season at the three traffic lights ( Immokolee, Bonita Beach and Livingston) adding to the air pollution which increases with stopped traffic. This problem not only effects the quality of life for all residents along the 4 mile stretch with extra time needed to reach a destination in either direction, with aggravation and ? road rage, increase in safety issues but most importantly health issues. There is much research concerning traffic induced health issues especially in children (who are most susceptible),prenatal and pregnant women. There are three schools along this 4 mile road but actually all are about a mile from the proposed development. Many kids will be at an increase risk. The added traffic congestion from the extra hundreds of cars from this file:///.file/id=6571367.8598229560 420 unit development can even now be determined with calculated risks. The available "traffic analysis" has no mention of the induced health risks from this proposal development or safety issues. No mention was made regarding the increase in air pollution, the risks of the left hand turn or the uniqueness of Livingston. Their assessment is inadequate in many ways due to the omission of important issues. Each resident in the this section of Livingston and further away will experience these air pollution risks. Traffic Air Pollution is more concentrated in slow stop and go traffic moving at 45 to 65 miles per hour compared to freeway driving. It increases in stopped traffic. The average speed on Livingston is probably 50 to 55 mph.This is one way how the increase in traffic will effect our air quality. (documentation is available). There is much research in Europe on traffic air pollution. Those cities are more congested compared to many of the US cities and the governments are very concerned. Diesel engines (which give out the worse pollution) are now banned in many large cities in Europe.Traffic air pollution effects pregnancy and the developing lungs of young children causing asthma and breathing issues. In addition neurological and learning problems have been related to traffic air pollution (documentation available). Much of this research is file:///.file/id=6571367.8598229560 found in European studies that I have read. Anyone can search the Web to fine these and other studies. I'm sure that the TR Transportation Consultants are expert statisticians and very knowledgeable but one has to be cautious and not be overly impressed by their 69 page analysis. I assume that they were hired by the developers. Their conclusions stated that during rush hour in the morning 104 cars will exit onto Livingston and during rush hour in the afternoon 107 cars will enter off of Veterans Memorial. Of particular note on page 10, it was documented that the analysis was performed "after school started". The traffic analysis was done at a time when the traffic had cleared! This analysis was poorly done. It concentrated on what Naples required and they missed the larger points or ignored them.Conclusions based on inadequate data are not valid. There is usually a backup now during the school year on the left turn lane onto Veterans Memorial by parents and buses. Parents also drop their kids off at the two schools south of the intersection being discussed. The mornings and afternoons are busy in this neighborhood! The statements in the traffic analysis create a credibility issue with their study since the left turn issue and the schools and safety and health issues were not even identified. Who else has the responsibility to give this needed information to the county? The morning time period and also the file:///.file/id=6571367.8598229560 afternoon time period that are so congested with the other two schools off Livingston Road are within a mile from the proposed development. In summary of my first issue, the Jacksonville zoning policy gives the logical ratio of cars per unit (1 .75) and this is not even close to the numbers assumed by the developers. The number of required spaces is substantial since a parking ramp would be needed and proposed. How many car spaces are needed by the Naples' zoning laws? This number did not seem to be available in the 69 page report. The out/in numbers noted above make no logical sense. These numbers don't pass the "smell test!" These facts are obvious. One would really wonder about the future traffic information statistics given in the report that are based on "yet to be proven" information. The density, the design of the exit on Livingston, the unique features of the 4 mile stretch of Livingston, and the zoning request to include renters create multiple unrelated problems. All prove that this development does not belong here. It should not be consistent with how the future of Collier County's decisions should be made. My second issue involves the left hand turn for drivers coming North on Livingston and making a left hand turn west onto Veterans Memorial. There are many other le/id=6571367.8598229560 left hand turn lanes on this 4 mile stretch. Parents make this left hand turn as mentioned above daily before classes start and later after school. School buses also make this turn in the mornings. They take up extra space on the left turn lane. The long length of the buses limits the number of cars that can stay in that turn lane. Some cars have to wait in a backup line into the adjacent active road lane. This left hand turn lane will also be used excessively due by the proposed development because the only exit from the development is onto Livingston. For those that wish to go South toward Naples, the drivers will have to make a left hand turn at this intersection of Veterans Memorial and Livingston. A left hand turn is where most crashes occur nationally as documented below. What percentage of drivers go South? This important statistic was not noted as far as I could tell in the 69 page report. If one assumes that 50% of the drivers in the proposed will go South toward Naples, then there would be a substantial number, especially in the morning for school drop-offs and during rush hour turning left. There is already a existing backup - also not mentioned in the report. The increase from the excessive number of additional cars is a disaster waiting to happen due to all these issues. It would be impossible to fix anything after the fact by changing the road. Prevent the obvious now by denying the development proposal. file://Mile/id=6571367.8598229560 There is no question that this left turn traffic will increase substantially due to the proposed development design by having the only exit onto Livingston. There are three references pertinent to left hand turns and their safety issues which is a cause of 30% to more than 50% of crashes nationally based on various studies. My first reference is from 2017 in an issue of International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology's article: Pedestrian safety under permissive left-turn signal control. The article discusses the risk of pedestrian injuries and death. It was shown that the volume of left-turn lanes is directly related to these statistics. The numbers of injuries and deaths will will increase significantly from the density of the development! The drivers are found to be more aggressive in such situations with pedestrians. This study was performed in a simulator to obtain important information. There is increase risk with a longer distance walk such as with 4 lanes or more across intersections. Our intersection has 6 lanes and seven going North with the lefthand lane included. There probably will surely be an increase in crashes from the new development with more people walking from the development based on predictable studies. file:///.file/id=6571367.8598229560 The second article was in the Claims Journal Magazine: Are Left Turns a Deadly Maneuver? This article states "that left turns are at the top of the list as being the most challenging and dangerous driving maneuvers". The National Highway Traffic Safety report stated that about half of crashes in the US involve left turns. The risk increases with rain, headlight glare, distraction by cell phones, confusion with the blinking yellow arrow, the speed of the oncoming traffic and the increase in speeding to make the light, being complacent or new at the intersection, misjudging distances especially in older drivers with poor vision, etc. With new residents constantly moving in and out of rental units, there is a learning curve in regard to skill needed with this particular left hand turn. In 2004 UPS eliminated left turns for it's drivers. FedX also has such restrictions due to the risk. Trucks can't speed up quickly after the turn. The third article was a 267 page dissertation at the University of Central Florida in Orlando. The candidate who performed the research, diagrams, photography, and statistics was Kirolos Haleem. On page 18, paragraph 4 he quoted that the 1 .72 million crossing path crashes, 75% were from left turns and of those: 41 .6% were at signalized intersections 36.3% when a stop sign was present file://Mile/id=6571367.8598229560 22.1 % at an intersection with no controls (this is a surprising statistic). It won't help at our intersection by placing a red arrow. Livingston Road is known as a "Racetrack" due to commuters using this road in lieu of the other close North/South roads of 75 and 41 . Livingston is a favorite due to having only one traffic light within the four mile stretch. This one light is at the intersection of Livingston and Veterans Memorial where the proposed development is being considered. Drivers don't want to stop and slow their commute time down. The human visual system cannot determine if an oncoming vehicle is going 60mph or 45 mph even with 20/20 acuity. This is a setup for a crash if a driver is making a lefthand turn in front of the oncoming traffic. Add other causative factors such as the oncoming driver running a red light, the turning driver is too slow to speed up, distraction, poor vision etc. and the result is a terrible crash. What should be done: 1 . Do not approve the zoning change that include a high density of renters in this area. According to the studies, it would be valid and reasonable to expect an increase in auto and pedestrian accidents. There are many reasons for this conclusion. 2. Do not approve the zoning for an excessive amount of units per acre. There is no le/id=6571367.8598229560 excess room on any of the these roads for additional cars especially on Livingston Road. The less residents, the less accidents at the left turn lane. Obviously the more cars - the more air pollution effecting every resident's health. Believe the logical parking space per unit ratio as stated in Jacksonville of 1 .75 cars per unit. A reasonable person would agree with this math and not with the figure of 105+1- cars leaving and entering during the rush hours as stated by the consultants. Naples has been awarded last year with first and second place awards in being either the happiest, the most well-being or the healthiest city in the entire country. The commissioners should make decisions that sustain the work that previous officials have worked so hard in achieving for the present status. There is a need and pressure for an increase in rental housing for Naples' workforce and others. Adding it to the area of Veterans Memorial and Livingston Road will create more problems with safety at the intersection and serious health issues related to the added air pollution. In summary, due to the significant in increase in traffic from such a high density development on a busy north/ south 4 mile road with no east/west exits off the road, file:///Jile/id=6571367.8598229560 safety issues involving increase crashes, air pollution, noise and light pollution, proximity to three schools, increase in bicycle and motorcycle traffic, the unique features of Livingston Road - this development should not be approved for such a high density population for the above reasons. Drivers and pedestrians are killed on the Naples roads now. Let's prevent more from happening due to the problems of this specific development. Thank you for your consideration Tim Diegel MD, 14 OCT 2018 (USAF, Ret,COL,CFS) Barrington Cove Timdiegelgmac.Com file:///.file/id=6571367.8598229560 RECEOVEID- Collier County Commissioner 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 303 JAN 14 2019 Naples, FL 34112 Att: Andy Solis By: To: Andy Solis We are writing this letter to protest the re-zoning of the property known as Allura Development, located on the southeast corner of Veterans Parkway& Livingston Road. The proposed apartment complex is incompatible with the surrounding single family home developments. This will no doubt have a negative impact on the property values. The traffic on Livingston Road has been an issue for the last two years. Exiting on to Livingston Road from Veterans Parkway is almost impossible during heavy commuting hours. Numerous times it has taken us up to 45 minutes to go this short distance. Cannot imagine what an additional 300+ residents will do. In addition there are many other reasons that this property should not be eligible for rezoning from a 170 single family development to a 420 four story apartment complex which are Flood Zone, Schools, &Fire Station, to name only a few. We purposed in the Strand relying that the neighboring projects would be of the same kind. Thank you for your consideration. James &Sue Tuohy 5881 Three Iron Dr #903 Naples, Fl 34110 Commissioner Andy Solis, Esq. Scanned Records Cover Sheet Date Material Received: 34/ l 1� Received From: 'Ridek.\IDVO IAV .Ch- ket+ti) �e� �1- 1 Description: G \ lv VO, I 1iQ -RD SGS r . I A`d1f3A0 VSO1 V1130 VHm1d -- �__ r - 11 1 - _. _ - - - - it 1 _ _ 11 I 11 aN l°b'41'0PirAl-liidiKllS.._1.-,J( ir.AWil-I6' 1,1 CIPlial vim_ , 0 1 * rit .... int cl 1 4 r 11.11107' 40 l'' 1 ,I , ' Ntr¢anrum)Jo WOO MtYt+tY I I . mil 1 I '} �_ -' 1i „,, .. 0 --,-7, i ,. a 7 n r a rnI! = TTTTTTTTT , TT . 4 I , r_T,Ttrrrr,,r,,,,,TTrrTrT,r,T _111__ jLT * I n L ; sem j DGCdia I' - � ° .1 f U U-1+ C ,”, I tu Milkt _ 1 1. Ovi a w m 0 N. Q a Z C i, .",,,,,,,,r,...,.-.,.,,., PO m 2. m O n ••.' 1"4, CD 1 ..-_,-,.: (01 0 0 Pell ct C 4 'gCI 4 a r" d ,, ,` CD `^ D r0 N ^t✓, - ~• l^-,l fwdCil , 1A co V, •• R yr R i n dQ O 3 3• 3 p 0 03 _ - 3 3 3 0c { I 1 GoodnerAngela From: Don McDaniel <DMcDaniel@pmfllp.com> Sent: Monday, November 26, 2018 4:32 PM To: SolisAndy Cc: Don McDaniel Subject: Allura Project Opposition Importance: High Dear Mr. Solis — I'm writing in regards to my opposition to the Allura project, petition #PL- 20170004419/CP-2018-1 to the rezoning so 420 rental apartments can be built on this property. My self and the majority of the people I know are not opposed to single family homes being built in this area. We are opposed to the property being rezoned so 420 rental apartments can be built. The rental apartments will house a minimum of 735 tenants and does not fit into the landscape of this area. Traffic - Immokalee Rd. to Bonita Beach Rd. has no East/West exits for 4.2 miles. Regularly and every week day during season traffic is backed up on Livingston every afternoon for hours from Bonita Beach Rd. south to Veterans Memorial Blvd. and further. To get my son to baseball practice in Bonita I have to go south to Immokalee to 41 then north to Bonita. These 420 rental apartments will certainly add to this congestion. Home Values - Most studies show at least a 12.7% decline in property values near multifamily rental apartments. There is a perceived stigma with apartments having higher crime and less desirable tenants. Whether this is true or not doesn't matter as it's the perceived stigma that keep people from buying homes next to rental apartments. Schools — What will the impacts be on the schools? Veterans Memorial Elementary is already at capacity and North Naples Middle School is at 86% capacity. I hope you can support the thousands of residents that oppose a project that is not consistent with the current land uses in the area and will have a negative impact to our investments and quality of life. We would like to continue to support you as our commissioner as you support us. Donald H. McDaniel 16487 Felicita Court Naples, Florida 34110-3263 (504) 905-6238 Email: dmcdanielpmfllp.com GoodnerAngela From: David W. Depew <planning@M-DA.com> Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2019 4:53 PM To: BosiMichael; SchmidtCorby Cc: FialaDonna; SolisAndy; SaundersBurt;TaylorPenny; McDanielBill; Tim Richards; Pritt, Robert Subject: Allura; PL20170004419/CP-2018-1; PL20170004385 Attachments: 18092-19-09-19 Alternate Language.pdf Dear Mr. Bosi: Attached please find a summary of the substance of my remarks to the Planning Commission regarding the Allura development. At the request of Attorney Robert Pritt, I am forwarding this to you, and copying the commissioners so that they will have this language prior to the hearing next Tuesday. As I noted to the Planning Commission, while the preferred option would be to deny the plan amendment, an alternative option would be to limit the number of dwelling units to no more than 4 units per acre, consistent with the highest density currently approved in the vicinity of the subject property. I have included modifications to the proposed conditions that would reflect the compatibility concerns that have been raised by the neighboring communities. Thank you in advance for you kind consideration. Regards, th Anniversary David W. Depew '.' RRIS D E P E W PhD,AICP, LEED®AP Principal&Co-Founder TollMain Free:9ffice:(239) 93 (866)337-7341 Cell:(239)850-6937 ENGINEERS• PLANNERS• SURVEYORS 2914 Cleveland Avenue Fort Myers,FL 33901 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS 495 Grand Boulevard,Suite 206 Destin,FL 32550 FORT MYERS I TALLAHASSEE I DESTIN PLANNING@M-DA.COM WWW.MORRIS-DEPEW.COM w a fes, Professional Services Since 1989 S, .-1 D WnIl4y WGar[I Think Green.Please print this e-mail only if necessary. IMPORTANT NOTICE The information contained in this transmission is privileged and confidential. It is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named in the address lines above.If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient,you are hereby notified that any dissemination,distribution or copy of this communication is strictly prohibited.If you have received this communication in error,please notify Morris-Depew Associates,Inc.immediately by telephone,toll free,at(866)337-7341 and return the original message.Although this E-mail and any attachments are believed to be free of any virus or other defect that might affect any computer system into which it is received and opened,it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free and no responsibility is accepted by Morris-Depew Associates,Inc.for damage arising in any way from its use.Thank you. r;, :,,,,t,,..'.� -'; h ..,,,,,_-.t.,:,4, -. .-.3.'.::,.. ..-,'':-.,!„,,,' � f ,-4r1,-,14-4:',, i 4� �` '';'4,,r:'' J�,�yds � "beg: ,,. r:, s `. to ' ` r . 44- f r � s. - fig' r � S € ' ;s; ' �.�+ 4--!"-''-;1.,.',"- � 3 4 ; ' � � ��y+"ra� +tydM' y,Y°' i ,'11>t. �' $ �. �� ez. a n ' $ � f � "' s. ',^r.'ti `s a„,'•••;',- -.''''':;,4' a �P ."v.' - • _ <t. r.,4,„..,,,,,,,,,,,,,-.; ' : :-ks "+ : ,. ' * $ 2 4r S. � � p�yrv� ` •� s . " ts aara` c '•:4;.-''":41214-.'fid!'; � - •,�s� k s .. a�# t' a 3 a . t is,, b i F K �fi, t'j P { r t s s '',.-i-,--,---, - € s w x 5 _ ,„....+r,+F ';,-",?„,::,;1,':,,,;. #y : ' s � ., • . av 'TT'' $ f��so 6f FE'S .r't`e'ar•' -_ f .dqq.i• £�auxt t�,Fb�'4 t5�x r`a< [ x i �y- " -4• `a a" aw '-s N tt gJs .x x ` 4k d.y IN',l _ F �t f �?q •M1 ,' J p. • t+ -,fi °c�1 ::...•;..,,,;„::' r .«igg.. , �gatr P � + v 4-'24..4.'4, g t.,. 4 ..;,.:4",-,,,#;,.. "--- - f cx --'''.1,",4' Y � � .. e' PL20170004419/CP-2018-1; PL20170004385 Allura PUD (PUDR) Alternate Language CGMP Alternate Language: Livingston Road/Veterans Memorial Boulevard East Residential Subdistrict Option 1: Deny the proposed amendment based upon a lack of relevant data and analysis, failure of the applicant to prove the necessity for the amendment, and a creation of internal inconsistencies within the CGMP if the amendment were to be adopted. Option 2: The Livingston Road/Veterans Memorial Boulevard East Residential Subdistrict consists of ±35.57 acres and is located in the southeast quadrant of the intersection of Livingston Road and Veterans Memorial Boulevard and is within a Transportation Concurrency Management Area (TCMA). The purpose of this Subdistrict is to allow for a multi-family development at a density of up to 12 9.81 4 units per acre and to fulfill the intent of the TCMA, as stated in FLUE Policy 6.1. Development in this Subdistrict shall be subject to the following: a. The Subdistrict site shall be rezoned to Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD). b. Allowable uses are limited to multi-family rental dwellings and shall not exceed 120 350 142 units, or not more than 4 units per gross acre. c. The RPUD shall demonstrate consistency with FLUE Policy 6.5 6.3 by providing two or more of the following: i. A transit shelter within the RPUD in a location and design approved by Collier County Public Transit & Neighborhood Enhancement (PTNE) Division; ii. Bicycle and pedestrian facilities, with connection to the abutting commercial property to the west; and, iii. Vehicular interconnection to the abutting commercial property to the west. PL20170004419/CP-2018-1;PL20170004385 Allura PUD(PUDR);Alternate Language Page 1 of 10 Certificates of occupancy shall not be approved for more than 24g 107 multi-family units (a density of 7.0 3.0 units per acre) until the applicable facilities and/or interconnections, as described above and approved as Development Commitments in the RPUD, have been completed. d. The RPUD shall include development standards and buffers to insure compatibility with surrounding land uses. PL20170004419/CP-2018-1;PL20170004385 Altura PUD(PUDR);Alternate Language Page 2 of 10 RPUD Alternate Language: ALLURA RPUD LIST OF PERMITTED USES PERMITTED USES: TRACT R — RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILY: 1. Principal Uses A. A maximum of /120142 multi-family dwelling units (11.98 4.0 units per acre). 2. Accessory Uses A. Customary accessory uses and structures to residential units, including carports, garages, utility and maintenance buildings, hand carwash area, and garbage and recycling receptacles. B. Community clubhouse, indoor and outdoor recreational uses and facilities such as swimming pools, tennis courts, pickle ball courts, bocce ball courts, volleyball courts, walking paths, picnic areas, dog parks, playgrounds, fitness centers, and community administration. These uses shall be permitted throughout the R designated areas of the PUD. C. Temporary sales trailers and model units, subject to LDC Section 5.04.05, as applicable. D. Entry gates and gatehouses. E. Stormwater management treatment facilities, conveyance facilities, and structures, such as berms, swales, and outfall structures. F. Parking structures, not to exceed 35 25 feet in actual height. TRACT P — PRESERVE: 1. Principal Uses A. Preservation of native habitat. 2. Accessory Uses A. Uses identified in and subject to the requirements and conditions set forth in LDC Section 3.05.07.H.1.h., Allowable uses within County required preserves. PL20170004419/CP-2018-1;PL20170004385 Altura PUD(PUDR);Alternate Language Page 3 of 10 EXHIBT B ALLURA RPUD DEVLOPMENT AND DESIGN STANDARDS The table below sets forth the development standards for the RPUD. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or subdivision plat, as the case may be. 1. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS MULTI- COMMUNITY STANDARD FAMILY RECREATION FACILITIES PRINCIPAL STRUCTURES MIN. LOT AREA 10,000 N/A S.F. MIN. LOT WIDTH 100 FEET N/A MIN. FLOOR AREA 650 N/A S.F./D.U. MINUMUM REQUIRED YARDS FROM LIVINGSTON ROAD 50 FEET 50 FEET FROM VETERANS 40 85 40 MEMORIAL BLVD. FEET 85 FEET FROM ALL OTHER PUD 2-0 50 2-0 PERIMETER BOUNDARIES FEET 50 FEET FROM PRESERVE 25 FEET 25 FEET FROM WATERBODY 1 0 FEET 0 FEET MIN. DISTANCE BETWEEN 20 FEET 20 FEET STRUCTURES MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT 0 35 NOT TO EXCEED (ZONED) FEET2 35 FEET MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT 60 45 NOT TO EXCEED (ACTUAL) FEET 2 42 FEET ACCESSORY STRUCTURES FROM LIVINGSTON ROAD S.P.S. 3 N/A PL20170004419/CP-2018-1;PL20170004385 Allura PUD(PUDR);Alternate Language Page 4 of 10 FROM VETERANS S.P.S. 3 N/A MEMORIAL BLVD. FROM ALL OTHER PUD 50 N/A PERIMETER BOUNDARIES FEET FROM PRESERVE 10 FEET N/A MIN. DISTANCE BETWEEN 10 FEET N/A STRUCTURES MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT 35 25 N/A NOT TO EXCEED (ZONED) FEET 4 MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT 42 35 N/A NOT TO EXCEED (ACTUAL) FEET 4 1. Measured from lake maintenance easement or bulkhead. 2. Inclusive of any under building parking. 3.The setback from Livingston Road and Veteran's Memorial Blvd.for one-story parking structures or carports shall be 20 feet. 4.The maximum actual height for parking structures is limited to 35 feet 2. DESIGN STANDARDS A. PUD access points will be gated. B. Buildings will be constructed with Concrete Masonry Unit construction or concrete construction. C. Roofs shall be cement or slate tile roof or approved equivalent (asphalt shingles prohibited). PL20170004419/CP-2018-1;PL20170004385 Allura PUD(PUDR);Alternate Language Page 5 of 10 - — - - - - -�- - - ZONED:ROW (VETERANS MEMORIAL BOULEVARD) c 666.3' _.... 20'TYPE"D"BUFFER N --1- INTERCONNBE ON TO �� /� ADJACENT COM AERCIAL I -------..� I� 507'7 Buffer—PARCEL — AY RELOCATED IN HE EVENT g ZONED:RPUD THE ADJACENT G PARCEL ZONED.C1 - 15'TYPE"B"BUFFER (BRANDON) -- ---� IS REZONED TO (VACANT) I 0 150' 300' COMMERCIAL I i 406TAil+E, 9u1YBR I I1 I R 20' Type C BuffersCALE:1"=300' I ZONED:AG 10'TYPE"A"BUFFER (VACANT) /�-/A-!., ? .,�„/\„/, .._200.8' ^ - I 50' Type C Buffer - 2,75 — ,_' _ `-10'TYPE"A”BUFFER' �-PROPERTY /. s BOUNDARY 1 ; .4 4144 41114. w a . 4.114 aw. �All 19•T44, rrEF 20'TYPE"D"BUFFER-�� ,.. .,{L. AL _ A« 20' Type C Buffer a a EGRESS .,, 4,.. aur aru )p I 0erf ONLY I ,. 0 IX ZZ I - taw aYa4aw uR - y .. ,, _0z I PRESERVE- .' I +ava awl, (14.74 AC) ,dy,, .,. ZONED:RPUD I t (BRANDON) - -� ,= aw. auey.- au. wr awa It i ' ') 1 _.15'TYPE �... ..,. .u.. ,. y. .�,. a. \ "B"BUFFER :.« ,u.i. auu awk aiw. rua \ ''' �` ZONED.CU aw. , Al*, awr a s" k ,t t (NORTH NAPLES FIRE) LEGEND ZONED'AG (VACANT) NOTES_ R RESIDENTIAL TRACT 1. OPEN SPACE SHALL BE PROVIDED THROUGH THE USE OF THE ONSITE PRESERVE,LAKE.LANDSCAPE VEHICULAR E INGRESS/EGRESS BUFFERS,AND COMMON OPEN SPACE IN THE RESIDENTIAL TRACT.MINIMUM OPEN SPACE=60%OF "41( ''' EGRESS TOTAL AREA(21.34 AC) EGRESS ONLY 2. NATIVE VEGETATION RETENTION REQUIRED:A MINIMUM OF 8.37 ACRES(25%OF LAND USE BREAKDOWN EXISTING ON SITE NATIVE VEGETATION). PROVIDED:14.74 ACRES 142 AREA(SF) AREA(AC) PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL 3. PRESERVES MAY BE USED TO SATISFY THE LANDSCAPE RESIDENTIAL TRACT(425 DWELLING UNITS) 773.626 17.76 49.93% BUFFER REQUIREMENTS AFTER EXOTIC VEGETATION REMOVAL IN ACCORDANCE WITH LDC SECTIONS 4.06.02 PRESERVE 642.074 14.74 41.44% AND 4.06.05.E.1.SUPPLEMENTAL PLANTINGS WITH LAKE 133,729 3.07 8.63% NATIVE PLANT MATERIALS,IF REQUIRED.SHALL BE IN TOTAL 1,549,429 35.57 100.00% ACCORDANCE WITH LDC SECTION 3.05.07. # DATE REVISIONS J.R.EVANS ENGINEERING,P.A. IIII 9351 CORKSCREW ROAD,SUITE 102 ALLURA ESTERO,FLORIDA 33928 J.R. EVANS PHONE:(239)4059148 ENGINEERING FAX (239)288-2537 MASTER CONCEPT PLAN WWW.JREVANSENGINEERING.COM FILE DATE: 6/22/18 I SHEET: 1 PL20170004419/CP-2018-1;PL20170004385 Altura PUD(PUDR);Alternate Language Page 6 of 10 EXHIBIT D ALLURA RPUD LEGAL DESCRPTION PARCEL 1 - OR 3876 PG 1542 THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA ALSO KNOWN AS LOT 11 IN UNRECORDED BRYAN ACRES SUBDIVISION. PARCELS 2 - OR 3876 PG 1546 THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 48, SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS THE WESTERLY 15 FEET THEREOF, AND THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 (SW 1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 (NW 1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 (NW 1/4) OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 (NE 1/4) OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 48, SOUTH, RANGE 25, EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. PARCEL 3 - OR 4744 PG 3049 THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (NE 1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW 1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW 1/4) OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (NE 1/4) SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS THE WEST THIRTY (30) FEET THEREOF RESERVED FOR ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY PURPOSES, SHOWN AS TRACT#2 OF UNRECORDED PLAT OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER. PARCEL 4 - OR 3675 PG 1026 THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER (NW1/4) OF THE NORTHEAST ONE-QUARTER (NE1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER (NW1/4) OF THE NORTHEAST ONEQUARTER (NE1/4) OF SECTION, 13, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. PARCEL 5 - OR 4908 PG 204 THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER; AND THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER, OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER, SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. PARCELS 6 - 11 - OR 4596 PG 980 PARCEL 1: THE WEST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF PL20170004419/CP-2018-1;PL20170004385 Altura PUD(PUDR);Alternate Language Page 7 of 10 THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. PARCEL 2: THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. PARCEL 3: THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. PARCEL 4: THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. PARCEL 5: THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. PARCEL 6: THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. PARCEL 12 - OR 4865 PG 2180 THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. PL20170004419/CP-2018-1;PL20170004385 Allura PUD(PUDR);Alternate Language Page 8 of 10 EXHIBIT E ALLURA RPUD DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS 1. Planning A. One entity (hereinafter the Managing Entity) shall be responsible for PUD monitoring until close-out of the PUD, and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUD commitments until close-out of the RPUD. At the time of this PUD approval, the Managing Entity is SD Livingston, LLC. Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity, then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document, to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. After such approval, the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts, the Managing Entity shall provide written notice to County that includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required by the RPUD by the new owner and the new owner's agreement to comply with the Commitments through the Managing Entity, but the Managing Entity will not be relieved of its responsibility under this Section. When the RPUD is closed out, then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment of PUD commitments. B. Issuance of a development permit by a county does not in any way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law. C. All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before commencement of the development. 2. ENVIRONMENTAL A. The Allura RPUD shall preserve a minimum of 8.37 acres on-site (25% of 33.49± acres of existing native vegetation). B. The Developer shall adhere to the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation PL20170004419/CP-2018-1;PL20170004385 Allura PUD(PUDR);Alternate Language Page 9 of 10 Commission Black Bear Management Plan, as applicable. The informational brochure created by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWCC) and titled "A Guide to Living in Bear County" will be distributed to future homeowners and construction/maintenance personnel. Residents will be provided with information on how to secure their garbage containers to discourage bears from foraging in trash receptacles and the project will utilize bear-proof dumpsters in locations to be determined at the time of Site Development Plan (SDP) approval. 3. TRANSPORTATION A. Intensity of uses under any development scenario for the PUD is limited to the two-way, unadjusted, average weekday, pm peak hour trip entering/exiting generation of 176 62 total trips utilized in the TIS dated February 6, 2018 as calculated for the reduced number of dwelling units (142), or as may be increased or decreased based on the use codes in the ITE Manual on trip generation rates in effect at the time of application for SDP/SDPA or subdivision plat approval. B. The Developer shall make a payment to Collier County for the development's proportional share of the cost of signalization of the intersection of Livingston Road and Veterans Memorial Boulevard in the amount of $17,194.72 $5,813.45 (based upon 142 dwelling units). This payment shall be made prior to approval of the first Site Development Plan (SDP) or subdivision plat for this PUD, whichever occurs first. C. A transit shelter shall be proved by the Developer in a location and design approved by Collier County Public Transit & Neighborhood Enhancement (PTNE) Department. The shelter shall be installed prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for residential use or by a later time certain if acceptable to PTNE Department. PL20170004419/CP-2018-1;PL20170004385 Allura PUD(PUDR);Alternate Language Page 10 of 10