The URL can be used to link to this page

Agenda 09/24/2019 Item # 9B (Della Rosa RPUD/Allura RPUD)09/24/2019 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This item requires ex parte disclosure be provided by the Commission members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve an Ordinance amending Ordinance Number 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, which established the comprehensive zoning regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida, by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of the herein described real property from a Rural Agricultural (A) zoning district, part of which is within a Special Treatment (ST) overlay, and a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) known as the Della Rosa RPUD, part of which is within a Special Treatment (ST) overlay, to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) zoning district for the project to be known as the Allura RPUD, to allow construction of a maximum of 304 multi - family dwelling units on property located on the south side of Veterans-Memorial Boulevard, just east of Livingston Road, in Section 13, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, consisting of 35.92± acres; providing for the repeal of Ordinance No. 07-73; and by providing for an effective date. (This is a companion to agenda item 9.A). OBJECTIVE: To have the Board of County Commissioners (Board) review staff’s findings and recommendations along with the recommendations of the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) regarding the above-referenced petition, render a decision regarding this rezoning petition, and ensure the project is in harmony with all the applicable codes and regulations in order to ensure that the community's interests are maintained. CONSIDERATIONS: The subject property consists of 35.92 acres and is located at the southeast corner of Livingston Road and Veterans Memorial Parkway in Section 13, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County. The petitioner is requesting to rezone 35.92 acres to allow multiple -family residential dwellings in a PUD. The rezoning proposal includes part of an existing PUD (Della Rossa), which is 15.38 acres. The remaining 20.54 acres of land is zoned A-Agricultural. The name of the proposed PUD is Allura. The base density is 4.0 D/U per acre, and there is a companion GMP Amendment to allow a proposed density of 8.46 D/U per acre. The applicant intends to amend Ordinance 2004 -41 Della Rosa PUD as part of their request. The existing Della Rosa PUD was approved in 2007 with a density of 7.0 D/U per acre (107 units) and consists of 6 parcels at the southern portion of the proposed site. Della Rosa was approved with a base density of 62 units and 45 additional units using TDR credits for the extra units. The entire site is within the Urban Residential Subdistrict. The applicant states that the existing agricultural zoning is generally considered a “holding” land use designation until an appropriate development scenario is determined. The proposed site does have access to central water and sewer, as well as other public utility services. The applicant has stated that the proposed multiple-family development will include market-rate apartment units with one, two, and three bedrooms. They have neither proposed nor are they seeking affordable housing density bonus units. The surrounding PUD projects with approved acreage, dwellings units and densities are listed here: Mediterra - 1,168 acres - 750 units - 0.56 DU/A Brandon - 51.10 acres - 204 units - 3.99 DU/A Sandalwood - 20.58 acres - 60 units - 3.1 DU/A RMC-Enclave - 40.55 acres - 162 units - 4.02 DU/A 9.B Packet Pg. 80 09/24/2019 Royal Palm International Academy - 178 acres - 600 units - 3.37 DU/A Marislea Villas - 10.25 acres - 27 units - 2.63 DU/A Della Rosa - 15.38 acres - 107 units - 7.0 DU/A Agricultural - ±10 acres - vacant - 0.2 DU/A Allura - 35.92 acres - 304 units - 8.46 DU/A A density map of the surrounding PUD projects has been included for review. FISCAL IMPACT: The County collects impact fees prior to the issuance of building permits to help offset the impacts of each new development on public facilities. These impact fees are used to fund projects identified in the Capital Improvement Element (CIE) of the Growth Management Plan (GMP) as needed to maintain an adopted Level of Service (LOS) for public facilities. Additionally, in order to meet the requirements of concurrency management, the developer of every local development order approved by Collier County is required to pay a portion of the estimated Transportation Impact Fees associated with the project in accordance with Chapter 74 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances. Other fees collected prior to issuance of a building permit include building permit review fees. Finally, additional revenue is generated by application of ad valorem tax rates, and that revenue is directly related to the value of the improvements. Please note that impact fees and taxes collected were not included in the criteria used by staff and the CCPC to analyze this petition. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: The Allura PUD rezone petition is contingent upon approval of the companion Growth Management Plan Amendment (GMPA) petition PL20170004419/CP-2018-1. The GMPA will establish the Livingston Road/Veterans Memorial Boulevard East Residential Subdistrict and was approved on March 26, 2019, for Transmittal by the Board of County Commissioners with the following Subdistrict language (in part), followed by staff analysis in brackets: Development in this Subdistrict shall be subject to the following: a. The Subdistrict site shall be rezoned to Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD). [This petition is for a PUD.] b. Allowable uses are limited to multi-family rental dwellings and shall not exceed 304 units of market-rate housing. [The PUD restricts dwellings to multi -family rental units and a maximum of 304 units.] c. The RPUD shall demonstrate consistency with FLUE Policy 6.1 by providing two or more of the following: a. A transit shelter within the RPUD in a location and design approved by Collier County Public Transit & Neighborhood Enhancement (PTNE) Division; b. Bicycle and pedestrian facilities, with connection to the abutting commercial property to the west; and, c. Vehicular interconnection to the abutting commercial property to the west. Certificates of occupancy shall not be approved for more than 249 multi-family units (a density of 7.0 units per acre) until the applicable facilities and/or interconnections, as described above and approved as Development Commitments in the RPUD, have been completed. These provisions, by Resolution 2019-54, were transmitted to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity and the review agencies in accordance with Chapter 163.3184(3), Florida Statutes. 9.B Packet Pg. 81 09/24/2019 Based upon the analysis, this proposed PUDR may not be deemed consistent with the FLUE. However, the petition may be deemed consistent if and when the companion GMP Amendment (PL20170004419/CP-2018-1) is adopted and goes into effect. The PUD Ordinance needs to provide for the effective date consistent with the effective date of the companion GMP amendment petition. Stipulations: 1. This petition may only be deemed consistent with the FLUE if the companion GMP amendment petition (PL20180003659/CPSS-2019-1) is adopted and goes into effect. 2. The PUDA Ordinance needs to provide for an effective date to be linked to the effective date of the companion GMP amendment petition. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION (CCPC) RECOMMENDATION: The CCPC heard petition PUDR-PL20170004385 and the companion GMPA PL20170004419 on August 1, 2019, and there was a motion to approve the GMPA PL20170004419. The motion failed by a vote of 2-3. Homiak and Dearborn voted in favor. Fryer, Strain, and Fry voted against. Chairman Strain explained reasons for the dissenting votes, including that the project is not compatible because the scale and massing are inconsistent with the local development pattern, higher density will produce more traffic, the project creates an isolated district with higher density than the surrounding area, provides a unique advantage to one property owner, and the change is not needed to develop the property other than what is already permitted by GMP. There was a motion to approve PUDR PL20170004385 with stipulations including: 1. Staff recommendation, change to footnote 3 “all perimeter PUD boundaries”; 2. 80-foot setback Livingston with enhanced buffer (Type D width and Type B planting); 3. Correct the accessory structure setback east side at Barrington Cove; 4. Essential Service Personnel as defined by Collier County first priority for 60 days for 55 units, 28 of the units for 80-100% of median income; 5. Minimum lease period is seven months. That motion failed by a vote of 2-3 Homiak and Dearborn voted in favor. Fryer, Strain, and Fry voted against. Since the motion failed for lack of support, the petition is presented to the Board with a recommendation of denial from the Planning Commission. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This is a site-specific rezone to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) Zoning District for a project to be known as the Allura RPUD. The burden f alls upon the applicant to prove that the proposed rezone is consistent with all the criteria set forth below. The burden then shifts to the Board of County Commissioners, should it consider denying the rezone, to determine that such denial would not be arbitrary, discriminatory or unreasonable. This would be accomplished by finding that the proposal does not meet one or more of the listed criteria below. Criteria for RPUD Rezones Ask yourself the following questions. The answers assist you in making a determination for approval or not. 1. Consider: The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. 2. Is there an adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of agreements, contract, or 9.B Packet Pg. 82 09/24/2019 other instruments or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense? Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the County Attorney. 3. Consider: Conformity of the proposed RPUD with the goals, objectives and policies of the Growth Management Plan. 4. Consider: The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. 5. Is there an adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development? 6. Consider: The timing or sequence of development (as proposed) for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. 7. Consider: The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. 8. Consider: Conformity with RPUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. 9. Will the proposed change be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies and future land use map and the elements of the Growth Management Plan? 10. Will the proposed RPUD Rezone be appropriate considering the existing land use pattern? 11. Would the requested RPUD Rezone result in the possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts? 12. Consider: Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. 13. Consider: Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed amendment necessary. 14. Will the proposed change adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood? 15. Will the proposed change create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create type s of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety? 16. Will the proposed change create a drainage problem? 17. Will the proposed change seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas? 9.B Packet Pg. 83 09/24/2019 18. Will the proposed change adversely affect property values in the adjacent area? 19. Will the proposed change be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations? 20. Consider: Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare. 21. Are there substantial reasons why the property cannot (“reasonably”) be used in accordance with existing zoning? (a “core” question…) 22. Is the change suggested out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the county? 23. Consider: Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. 24. Consider: The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. 25. Consider: The impact of development resulting from the proposed RPUD rezone on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance [Code ch.106, art.II], as amended. 26. Are there other factors, standards, or criteria relating to the RPUD rezone request that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare? The Board must base its decision upon the competent, substantial evidence presented by the written materials supplied to it, including but not limited to the Staff Report, Executive Summary, maps, studies, letters from interested persons and the oral testimony presented at the Board hearing as these items relate to these criteria. The proposed Ordinance was prepared by the County Attorney’s Office. This is approved as to form and legality, and requires an affirmative vote of four for Board approval (HFAC) RECOMMENDATION: The Zoning Division Staff respectfully disagrees with the recommendation of the CCPC and continues to recommend approval of the petition, which is reflected in the attached Ordinance and recommends that the Board approve the applicant’s request to rezone the subject property to RPUD zoning district. Prepared by: C. James Sabo, AICP, Principal Planner, Zoning Division ATTACHMENT(S) 1. Final Staff Rept Allura 7.9.19 (PDF) 2. Attachment-A PUD Ordinance Allura-062419 (PDF) 3. Attachment-B Allura RPUD Density Map (PDF) 4. Attachment-C FLUE Consistency Review Allura (PDF) 5. Attachment-D Allura Trans Consistency Findings (PDF) 9.B Packet Pg. 84 09/24/2019 6. [Linked] Back Up Material Allura RPUD (PDF) 7. [Linked] Allura Letters of Objection (PDF) 8. Affidavit of Sign Posting & Photos of Signs (6-28-2019) (PDF) 9. Legal Ad - Agenda ID 9789 (PDF) 9.B Packet Pg. 85 09/24/2019 COLLIER COUNTY Board of County Commissioners Item Number: 9.B Doc ID: 9789 Item Summary: ***This item to be heard no sooner than 10:00 a.m.*** This item requires ex parte disclosure be provided by the Commission members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve an Ordinance amending Ordinance Number 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, which established the comprehensive zoning regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida, by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of the herein described real property from a Rural Agricultural (A) zoning district, part of which is within a Special Treatment (ST) overlay, and a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) known as the Della Rosa RPUD, part of which is within a Special Treatment (ST) overlay, to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) zoning district for the project to be known as the Allura RPUD, to allow construction of a maximum of 304 multi-family dwelling units on property located on the south side of Veterans-Memorial Boulevard, just east of Livingston Road, in Section 13, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, consisting of 35.92± acres; providing for the repeal of Ordinance No. 07 -73; and by providing for an effective date. (This is a companion to agenda item 9.A). Meeting Date: 09/24/2019 Prepared by: Title: – Zoning Name: James Sabo 08/14/2019 5:21 PM Submitted by: Title: Manager - Planning – Zoning Name: Ray Bellows 08/14/2019 5:21 PM Approved By: Review: Growth Management Department Judy Puig Level 1 Reviewer Completed 08/16/2019 2:42 PM Zoning Ray Bellows Additional Reviewer Completed 09/03/2019 1:24 PM Growth Management Department Thaddeus Cohen Department Head Review Completed 09/04/2019 9:04 AM Growth Management Department James C French Deputy Department Head Review Completed 09/04/2019 4:45 PM Office of Management and Budget Laura Wells Level 3 OMB Gatekeeper Review Completed 09/10/2019 3:16 PM County Attorney's Office Jeffrey A. Klatzkow Level 3 County Attorney's Office Review Completed 09/12/2019 10:47 AM Office of Management and Budget Laura Zautcke Additional Reviewer Completed 09/13/2019 9:59 AM County Manager's Office Nick Casalanguida Level 4 County Manager Review Completed 09/14/2019 12:06 PM Board of County Commissioners MaryJo Brock Meeting Pending 09/24/2019 9:00 AM 9.B Packet Pg. 86 TO: FROM: HEARING DATE: JULY 18,2019 SUBJECT: STAFF REPORT COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMIS SION ZONING DIVISION _ ZONING SERVICES SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT PUDR.PL2OI 70004385 ALLURA PUD COMPANION GMPT/GMPA, PL2O 1 7 -OOO44I9ICP-20 1 8- 1 PROPERTY OWNERS/APPLICANT/AGENT : Owner: SD Livingston, LLC. 239 Professional Circle #l0l Naples, FL 34119 Applicant: Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP, V.P. Hole Montes, Inc. 950 Encore Way Naples, FL 34110 Agent: Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP, V.P. Hole Montes, Inc. 950 Encore Way Naples, FL 34110 Richard Yovanovich, Esq. Coleman, Yovanovich, Koester 4001 Tamiami Trail N. suite 300 Naples, FL 34103 REOUESTED ACTION: The applicant is requesting that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) consider an application to rezone the property from PUD Della Rosa and Agricultural zoning district to Planned Unit Development (PUD) Allura zoning district. The property consists of several parcels. There is a companion large scale GMPA for 35.57 acres related to this request. The total acreage for the PUD rezoning request is 35.92. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property is located at the southeast corner of Livingston Road and Veterans Memorial Parkway in Section 13, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County (see location map, page 2). The proposed Master Plan is included in the PUD Ordinance, Attachment A. PUDZ-PL2O170004385; Allura PUD Revised: June 25, 2019 Page 1 of 17 9.B.1 Packet Pg. 87 Attachment: Final Staff Rept Allura 7.9.19 (9789 : PUDR PL20170004385 Allura) o_(o o)C'- oN Lr) @ c.)$ooot- oNJ o_ o -o EJz c .o 0)(L = o-(5 Co (5ooJ P UDZ-P L2O1 7 OOO4385; Allura PU D Revised: June 25,20199.B.1Packet Pg. 88Attachment: Final Staff Rept Allura 7.9.19 (9789 : PUDR PL20170004385 Allura) PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The petitioner is requesting to rezone 35.92 acres to allow multiple-family residential dwellings in a PUD. The rezoning proposal includes part of an existing PUD (Della Rossa), which is 15.38 acres. The remainrng2}.54 acres of land is zoned A-Agricultural. The name of the proposed PUD is Allura. The base density is 4.0 Dfu per acre, and there is a companion GMP Amendment to allow a proposed density of 8.46 DAJ per acre. The existing Della Rosa PUD was approvedin2}}T with a density of 7.0 Dfu per acre (107 units) and consists of 6 parcels at the southern portion of the proposed site. Della Rosa was approved with a base density of 62 units and 45 additional units using TDR credits for the extra units. The entire site is within the Urban Residential Subdistrict. The applicant states that the existing agricultural zoning is generally considered a "holding" land use designation until an appropriate development scenario is determined. The proposed site does have access to central water and sewer, as well as other public utility services. The applicant has stated that the proposed multiple-family development will include market-rate apartment units with one, two, and three bedrooms. They have neither proposed, nor are they seeking affordable housing density bonus units. The surrounding PUD projects with approved acreage, dwellings units and densities are listed here: Mediterra - 1,168 acres - 750 units - 0.56 DU/A Brandon - 51 .10 acres - 204 units - 3.99 DU/A Sandalwood - 20.58 acres - 60 units - 3.1 DU/A RMC-Enclave - 40.55 acres - 162 units - 4.02 DUiA Royal Palm International Academy - 178 acres - 600 units -3.37 DU/A Marislea Villas - 10.25 acres - 27 uruts -2.63 DU/A Della Rosa - 15.38 acres - 107 units - 7 .0 DUIA Agricultural - +10 acres - vacant - 0.2DUlA Allura -35.92 acres - 304 units - 8.46 DU/A A density map of the surrounding PUD projects and the respective densities for each project has been included as Attachment B. PUDZ-PL2O170004385; Allura PUD Revised: June 25, 2019 Page 3 of 17 9.B.1 Packet Pg. 89 Attachment: Final Staff Rept Allura 7.9.19 (9789 : PUDR PL20170004385 Allura) SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: North: South: East: West: Residential single-family, zoned Meditena PUD Residential single-family & Fire Station, zoned Agriculture-CU, Brandon PUD Residential single-family, zoned Brandon PUD Vacant undeveloped, zoned Agricultural PUDZ-PL2O1 70004385; Allura PUD Revised: June 25, 2019 Page 4 of 17 aru:Imo<C BLVII I 9.B.1 Packet Pg. 90 Attachment: Final Staff Rept Allura 7.9.19 (9789 : PUDR PL20170004385 Allura) GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY: The Allura PUD rezone petition is contingent upon approval of the companion Growth Management Plan Amendment (GMPA) petition PL201700044191CP-2018-1. The GMPA will establish the Livingston Road/Veterans Memorial Boulevard East Residential Subdistrict, and was approved on March 26,2019 for Transmittal by the Board of County Commissioners with the following Subdistrict language (in part), followed by staffanalysis in brackets: Development in this Subdistrict shall be subject to the following: a. The Subdistrict site shall be rezoned to Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD). [This petition is for a PUD.] b. Allowable uses are limited to multi-family rental dwellings and shall not exceed 304 units of market rate housing. [The PUD restricts dwellings to multi-family rental units and a maximum of 304 units.l c. The RPUD shall demonstrate consistency with FLUE Policy 6.1 by providing two or more of the following: a. A transit shelter within the RPUD in a location and design approved by Collier County Public Transit & Neighborhood Enhancement (PTNE) Division; b. Bicycle and pedestrian facilities, with connection to the abutting commercial property to the west; and, c. Vehicular interconnection to the abutting commercial property to the west. Certificates of occupancy shall not be approved for more than 249 multi-family units (a density of 7.0 units per acre) until the applicable facilities and/or interconnections, as described above and approved as Development Commitments in the RPUD, have been completed. These provisions, by Resolution 2019-54, were transmitted to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity and the review agencies in accordance with Chapter 163.3184(3), Florida Statutes. REVIEW OF PUD and PUD-RELATED DOCUMENTS: The Allura Residential Planned Unit Development (PUD) Rezone captures the necessary Subdistrict provisions as Development Commitments. However, Transportation Commitment 3.C. commits, "a transit shelter shall be provided by the Developer in a location and design approved by Collier County Public Transit & Neighborhood Enhancement (PTNE) Department. The shelter shall be installed prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for residential use or by a later time certain if acceptable to PTNE Department." Staff points out that such a commitment does not insure a transit shelter will be provided. The subject property is not known to be located on a current or planned transit route. and the ability to provide a transit shelter that would fulfill the requirements of TDM strategies does not appear PUDZ-PL20170004385; Allura PUD Revised: June 25, 2019 Page 5 of 17 9.B.1 Packet Pg. 91 Attachment: Final Staff Rept Allura 7.9.19 (9789 : PUDR PL20170004385 Allura) to be an effective proposal. PTNE personnel commented how an upcoming long-range planning process will be updating transit routing in this area, which may include this north-south route. While public transit is of general benefit, it cannot be determined whether a transit shelter would be approved without an analysis provided from the developer. If left written as proposed, Transportation Commitment 3.C. would not qualify as a TDM strategy commitment for purposes of the policy to qualiff for a density bonus. Relevant FLUE objectives and policies are stated below, followed by staff remarks. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.6 requires new development to be compatible with, and complementary to, surrounding land uses, as set forth in the Land Development Code. Comprehensive Planning reviewers leave this determination to the Zoning Services staff as part of their review of the petition in its entirety. However, staff notes that in reviewing the appropriateness of the requested uses/intensities on the subject property, the compatibitity analysis is to be comprehensive and include a review of both the subject property and surrounding or nearby properties with regard to allowed use intensities and densities, development standards (building heights, setbacks, landscape buffers, etc.), building mass, building location and orientation, architectural features, amount and type of open space and location, traffic generation/attraction, and so forth. The County recognizes Smart Growth policies and practices in its consideration of future land use arrangements and choice-making options. FLUE Objective 7 and Policies 7.1 through 7.4 promote Smart Growth policies for new development and redevelopment projects pertaining to access, interconnections, open space, and walkable communities. The Board of County Commissioners held a workshop earlier in2019 to revisit these (and other) Smart Growth policies and practices, which resulted with a renewed support for and re-emphasis on them. Each Policy is followed by staffanalysis and comments [in bold italicized textJ. Objective 7: Promote smart growth policies, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and adhere to the existing development character of Collier County, where applicable, and as follows: Policy 7.1: The County shall encourage developers and property owners to connect their properties to fronting collector and arterial roads, except where no such connection can be made without violating intersection spacing requirements of the Land Development Code. [The Allura Master Concept Plan (unlabeled Exhibit C, updated to 4/29/2019), depicts a subject property that fronts Livingston Road (classiJied as a major urterial road) and Veterans Memorial Boulevard. Veterans Memorial is an unclassified two-lane undivided roadway - where all traffic mav enter and exit. The Master Concept Plan depicts connection to Veterans Memorial Boulevard with its main point of "vehicular ingress/egress.' No connection is depicted to Livingston Road. (Submittal I document, RPUD Evaluation Criteria, is outduted where it explains how this [projectJ provides access to both roadways through an interconnected internal driveway system-)J Policy 7.2: PUDZ-PL2O170004385; Allura PUD Revised: June 25, 20'l 9 Page 6 of 17 9.B.1 Packet Pg. 92 Attachment: Final Staff Rept Allura 7.9.19 (9789 : PUDR PL20170004385 Allura) The County shall encourage intemal accesses or loop roads in an effort to help reduce vehicle congestion on nearby collector and arterial roads and minimize the need for traflc signals. [The "interconnected internal driveway syslem" are the traffc lanes that link together vehicular parking lots, providing lenants with access lo the multi-family residential buildings. This internal access, in combination wilh TDM mitigation strotegy commitments (discussed obove), are offered to mandge congestion in this orea.l Policy 7.3: All new and existing developments shall be encouraged to connect their local streets and/or interconnection points with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless ofland use type. The interconnection of local streets between developments is also addressed in Policy 9.3 of the Transportation Element. [The property abuts Livingston Road (lo the wesl) and veterans Memorial Boulevard (to the north). Application materials (Submi al I document, RPLID Evaluotion Criteria) express a willingness to "accommodate intercohnection,, with the vacant adjacent C-l zoned proper\) to the northwest. The Allura Master Concept Plan (unlabeled Exhibit C, updated to 1/29/2019), depicts interconnection lwitl, a double-ended arrow, ltbeled for "vehicular ingress/egress"J h,ilh this adjoining vdcant properq, @tong with an accompanying note, indicating this "interconnection... may be relocated [southu,ardJ in the everrt lhe adjacent AG parcel is rezoned to commercial." These connections are part of the TDM strateg) commilments required by the Livingston Road/Veterans Memorial Boulevard East Residential Subdistrict (discussed above), under the Review of PUD and PUD-related Documents. The Master Concept Plan does not depict conneclion with/lo the local streets and./or interconnection points in adjoining neighborhoods or other developments to the east or south - where it does not appedrfeasible to interconnecl.J Policy 7.4: The County shall encourage new developments to provide walkable communities with a blend of densities, common open spaces! civic facilities, and a range of housing prices and types. [Mth respect to providing walkability, this Policy promotes development where it is safe and convenient to walk and encourages pedeslrian dctivity. The Allura Masler Concepl Plan (unlabeled Exhibit C, updated to 1/29/2019), does not depict the arrangement of apqrtment buildings and parking structures, or the driveway and walkway network connecting them- The Allura RPUD Document, (Exhibit A. updated to 6/18/2019), and Exhibit E, Development Commitments, do not include/address sidewalk, walkway, or pathway - eitlrer internal or fronting roadway - commitments. Exhibil E, Deviations, dnd otlrer submittal documents, however, do not propose deviations from LDC requirements, with respect to sidewalks, wdkways, or pathways, which the applicant provides as required per the LDC. Exhibit A, the Allura RPUD Document (updated to 6/18/2019), Permitted lJses, describes various active and passive recreational uses and facilities, including clubhouse/recreation buildings. P UDZ-P L2O 1 7 OOO4385; Allura PU D Revised: June 25, 2019 Page 7 of 17 9.B.1 Packet Pg. 93 Attachment: Final Staff Rept Allura 7.9.19 (9789 : PUDR PL20170004385 Allura) With respect to providing a blend of densities, this policy promotes projects that offir a range of housing prices snd types. Submittal I document, RPUD Evaluution Criteria, explains how this development will allow one- two- and three-bedroom market-rate apartments. Exhibit B, Development and Design Standards (updated to 6/18/2019), Table l, Development Standards, does not provide for separate minimum Jloor areas for the one-two- and three-bedroom apartments. The single standard dwelline unit size proposed is 650-sq. ft. minimum floor area for all apartment configurations. No other submittal documents appear to propose or require that some combination of these different apartment styles and Jloor areas be provided. It is assumed there will be a mk of unit sizes and number of bedrooms with associated dffirences in rental prices.J CONCLUSION: Based upon the above analysis, this proposed PUDR ma), not be deemed consistent with the FLUE. However, the petition may be deemed consistent if and when the companion GMP Amendment (PL201700044191CP-2018-1) is adopted and goes into effect. The PUD Ordinance needs to provide for the effective date consistent with the effective date of the companion GMP amendment petition. Stipulations: 1. This petition may only be deemed consistent with the FLUE if the companion GMP amendment petition (PL20180003659/CPSS-2019-1) is adopted and goes into effect. 2. The PUDA Ordinance needs to provide for an effective date to be linked to the effective date of the companion GMP amendment petition. The Comprehensive Planning Consistency Review Memo has been included as Attachment C. Transportation Element: In evaluating this project, staff reviewed the applicant's April 30, 2018, Traffic Impact Statement for consistency with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan (GMP) using the then applicable 2017 Annual Update and Inventory Reports (AUIR). Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP states: "The County Commission shall review all rezone petitions, SRA designation applications, conditional use petitions, and proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) affecting the overall countywide density or intensity of permissible development, with consideration of their impact on the overall County transportotion system, and shall not approve any petition or application that would directly access a deficient roadway segment as identified in the current AUIR or if it impacts an adjacent roadway segment that is deficient as identified in the current AUIR, or which significantly impacts a roadway segment or adjacent roadway segment that is currently operating and/or is projected to operate below an adopted Level of Service Standard within the five year AUIR planning period, unless specific mitigating stipulations are also approved. A petition or application PUDZ-PL20170004385; Allura PUD Revised; June 25,2019 Page 8 of 17 9.B.1 Packet Pg. 94 Attachment: Final Staff Rept Allura 7.9.19 (9789 : PUDR PL20170004385 Allura) has significant impacts if the trqffic impoct statement reveals thot any of the following occur.' a. For linlrs (roadway segments) directly accessed by the project where project trffic is equal lo or exceeds 2oZ of the adopted LOS standard sertice volume; b. For linl<s adjacent to links directly accessed by the project where project trffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume,. and c. For all other links the project trafic is considered to be significant up to the point where it is equal to or exceeds 3'% of the adopted LOS standard service yolume. Mitigoting stipulations shall be based upon a mitigation plan prepared by the applicant and submitted as part of the trffic impact statement that oddresses the project,s significant impacts on all roadways. " Staff finding: According to the TIS provided with this petition the proposed rezoning to allow a maximum 304 multi-family residential units (residential condo/townhouse) will generate a proj ected +l- 129 PM peak hour, two-way trips on the immediately adjacent roadway link, Veterans Memorial Boulevard and Livingston Road. Veterans Memorial Boulevard is a two-1ane facility and is not currently tracked for capacity in the AUIR. Livingston Road adjacent to this proposed development is a six-lane divided facility, with a current service volume of 3,000 trips and a remaining capacity of approximately 1,721 trips, and is currently operating at LOS ,,B,,,as identified in the 2017 AUIR. Immokalee Road from Airport-Putling Road to Livingston Road is a sixlane divided facility, with a cunent service volume of 3.100 trips and a remaining capacity of approximately 305 trips and is currently operating at Los "D" with an expected deficiency in 2023. Immokalee Road from Livingston Road is a sixJane divided facility, with a current senyice volume of 3,500 trips and a remaining capacity of approximately 1.011 trips and is currently operating at LOS "C.' Therefore, the subject roadway links have sufficient capacity to accommodate the project within the 5-year planning period. Staff notes that the development is within the Northwest Transportation concurrency Management Area (TCMA), and this rezone request has committed to using at least two Transportation Demand Management (TDM) strategies. Transportation Demand Management (TDM) strategies for residential developments area are as follows: a) Include neighborhood commercial uses within a residential project. b) Providing tansit shelters within the development (shall be coordinated with Collier County Transit). c) Providing bicycle and pedestrian facilities with connections to adjacent comrnercial properties. d) Vehicle access to adjacent commercial properties with shared commercial and residential parking. It is transportation staff s opinion that the first TDM strategy does not apply for the proposed development because no commercial use is proposed within the proposed development. Staff will be requiring a developer commitment for the TDM's, and the Developer Commitments for TDM's have been included in the Transportation Section ofthe PUD. P UDZ-P L2O 1 7 OOO4385i Allura PU D Revised: June 25, 20'19 Page I of 17 9.B.1 Packet Pg. 95 Attachment: Final Staff Rept Allura 7.9.19 (9789 : PUDR PL20170004385 Allura) Additionally, Transportation Planning has provided a memo related to their Consistency Findings for Planning Commission review. The Transportation Findings memo has been included as Attachment D. Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME): Environmental review staff has found this project to be consistent with the Conservation & Coastal Management Element (CCME). The project site consists of 33.49 acres of native vegetation. A minimum of 8.37 acres (25oh) preserve is required, however, 15.07 acres of preserve and shall be placed under preservation and dedicated to Collier County. STAFF ANALYSIS: Staff has completed a comprehensive evaluation of this land use petition, including the criteria upon which a recommendation must be based, specihcally noted in LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5, Planning Commission Recommendation (referred to as the "PUD Findings"), and Section 10.02.08.F, Nature of Requirements of Planning Commission Reporr (referred to as "Rezone Findings"), which establish the legal basis to support the CCPC's recommendation. Drainaqe: The proposed PUD Amendment request is not anticipated to create drainage problems in the area. Stormwater best management practices, treatment, and storage will be addressed through the environmental resource permitting process with the South Florida Water Management District. County staff will also evaluate the project's stormwater management system, calculations, and design criteria at the time of site development plan (SDP) and/or platting (PPL). Environmental Review: Environmental Planning staff has reviewed the petition to address environmental concems. The PUD preserve requirement is 8.37 acres (25% of 33.49 acres). The PUD Master Plan provides atotal of 15.07-acre preserve, which meets the minimum 25 percent native preservation requirement in accordance with LDC 3.05.07. No listed animal species were observed on the property; however, the property has suitable habitat for various listed species. A potential nesting site for Big Cypress Fox Squirrel (Sciurus niger avicennia) was observed in the north central portion of the site. Prior to the site clearing stage of the proposed development, additional observations for Big Cypress Fox Squirrel nests will be needed. The proposed project is located within the Federal Wildlife Service (FWS) consultation area for Bonneted Bat (Eumops floridanus). Two cavity trees where observed onsite with the potential to contain Bonneted Bat; however, no evidence was found indicating the trees were being utilized. The Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) wildlife data indicates the presence of Black Bear (Ursus americanus /loridanzs) in the area. A black bear management plan will need to be included at PPL or SDP review. Additionally, Butterfly Orchid (Encyclia tampensis) and Stiff-leafed wild-pine (Tillandsiafasciculala) listed as a less rare plants, have been observed in the proposed preserve area on the subject property and shall be protected in accordance with LDC 3.04.03. finds this petition consistent with the GMP, and Planning Commission (CCPC) forwards Petition Transportation Reviev)'. Transportation staff fuither recommends that the Collier County PUDZ-PL20170004385; Allura PUD Revised: June 25,2019 Page 10 of 17 9.B.1 Packet Pg. 96 Attachment: Final Staff Rept Allura 7.9.19 (9789 : PUDR PL20170004385 Allura) Allura PUDR-PL20170004385 to the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) with a recommendation of approval. The Transportation Division also requires Developer Commitments for Transportation Demand Management Strategies. Landscape Review: The applicant is not proposing any deviations pertaining to landscape. The buffers labeled on the Master Plan are consistent with LDC requirements. Staff visited the site to evaluate the condition of the preserve. Based on the density of the existing plantings, the size of the preserve, and the quantity of existing native vegetation within the preserve, it is staff s opinion that the buffer requirements will be met by the preserve once exotics are removed and supplemental planting if needed, is provided. The applicant is proposing an enhanced Type 'B' buffer where abutting portions of the Barrington community to the East as shown on Exhibit C-1. School District: At this time, there is existing or planned capacity within the next five years for the purposed development at the elementary, middle, and high schools. At the time of site plan or plat, the development would be reviewed for concurrency to ensure there is capacity either within the concurrency service area, the development is located within or adjacent concurrency service areas. Utilities Review: The project lies within the regional potable water service area and the north wastewater service areas of the Collier County Water-Sewer District. Water and wastewater services are readily available via existing infrastructure along the project's frontages on Livingston Road and Veterans Memorial Boulevard. System capacity must be confirmed at the time of development permit (SDP or PPL) review, and a commitment to provide service will be established upon pennit approval. Zoning Services Review: Zoning Division staff has evaluated the proposed uses related to their intensity and reviewed the proposed development standards for the project. The Zoning Division also evaluated the location and orientation of the proposed multiple-family development project. The project site area was increased from 15.38 acres to 35.92 acres. The project arca now fronts along two roads Livingston and Veterans Memorial Parkway with ingress-egress proposed only along Veterans Memorial Parkway. The proposed project area includes part of the previously approved multiple-family PUD project, Della Rosa, which allowed a total of 107 dwelling units. Initially, the applicant had proposed 420 multiple-family units for the Allura project. However, during the Comprehensive Plan large scale amendment process, the total number of units was reduced from 420 to 304 dwelling units. While 304 units is a large increase in density over the approved Della Rosa PUD, it is a reasonable increase based on the increased land area that is proposed. Additionally, during the GMPA process, the applicant originally proposed building the principal structures with heights of 4-stories at 50 feet zoned height and 60 feet actual height. The applicant, however, reduced the proposed principal structure heights to 3-stories at 40 feet zoned height and 50 feet actual height. Again, the proposed principal structure heights are greater than the surrounding residential home structures. However, the reduced number of stories and reduced building height is more compatible with the surrounding residential neighborhoods than the originally proposed higher structure heights. PUDZ-PL20170004385; Allura PUD Revised: June 25,2019 Page1lof17 9.B.1 Packet Pg. 97 Attachment: Final Staff Rept Allura 7.9.19 (9789 : PUDR PL20170004385 Allura) The intensity of the proposed residential project is reasonable related to the surrounding uses. While the proposed multiple-family residential density, at8.46 DU/A, is significantly higher than the surrounding densities, it is important to note that a single concentration of higher density within a lower density area of development is an appropriate mix of density. The applicant has attempted to address the higher density near the Brandon PUD along the east property boundary with an alternate and enhanced buffer. The proposed alternate buffer is denser than is required by LDC provisions. Specifically, the addition of l2-foot-tall fishtail palms spaced 10 feet on center provides greater opacity. Additionally, the applicant has proposed a larger setback for the residential single-family property to the east at Brandon PUD. The eastern perimeter boundary setback is 125 feet. A similarly large PUD setback for perimeter boundary was recently approved for the Baumgarten PUD at Immokalee and Collier Boulevard (951). The PUD eastem and southern perimeter boundaries for pools or dumpsters were set at 105 feet. Also, an additional 1-foot of setback is required for every 1-foot a building exceeds 50 feet. With respect to the remainder of the Development Standards, the proposed standards are appropriate based on the multiple-family residential use. As stated, an enhanced perimeter boundary "altemative type B buffer" is proposed at the eastern boundary. The other perimeter buffers are a standard type B buffer for the lake area and the Livingston and Veterans Memorial buffers are type D buffers, which meet the provisions of the LDC. PUD FINDINGS: LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5 states that "In support of its recommendation, the CCPC shall make findings as to the PUD Master Plan's compliance with the following criteria in addition to the findings in LDC Section 10.02.08": (Zoning Division staff responses in non-bold). The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. ZoningDivision staff has reviewed the proposed rezoning request and finds the uses, and property development regulations are compatible with the development projects approved in the area. The Public Utilities Division further states that water distribution/transmission and wastewater transmission mains are readily available within the Livingston Road and Veterans Memorial Boulevard rights-of-way, and there is adequate water and wastewater treatment capacity to serve the proposed PUD. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitabitity of any proposed agreements, contracts, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Documents submitted with the application were reviewed by the County Attorney's Office PUDZ-PL20170004385; Allura PUD Revised: June 25,2019 1. ) Page 12 of 17 9.B.1 Packet Pg. 98 Attachment: Final Staff Rept Allura 7.9.19 (9789 : PUDR PL20170004385 Allura) -t. and demonstrate unified confol. Conformity of the proposed Planned Unit Development with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). Comprehensive Planning staff has reviewed the petition and analyzed it for consistency with goals, objectives, and policies ofthe GMP. They have lound the proposed amendment to be consistent with the GMP, if stipulations related to transit shelter location, commercial interconnectivity, and maximum certificates of occupancy, and if the companion amendment is approved. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on the location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. The proposed PUD Document buffering, and screening standards include altemative buffer types. They have been reviewed and are acceptable. 5. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. There is no deviation from the required usable open space as submitted. Compliance with approved standards would be demonstrated at the time ofSDP. 6. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of ensuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. Compliance with all other applicable concurrency management regulations is required, including but not limited to, plat plans or site development plans. The Public Utilities Division further states that Collier County has sufficient treatment capacity for water and wastewater services to the project. Conveyance capacity must be confirmed at the time of development permit application. 7. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. Most of the surrounding area has been developed. There is adequate supporting infrastructure to accommodate this project, including Collier County Water-Sewer District potable water and wastewater mains. Adequate public facility requirements will be addressed when future development approvals are sought. The Public Utilities Division further states that the area has adequate supporting infrastructure, including adjacent Collier County Water-Sewer District potable water and wastewater mains, to accommodate this project. 8. Conformity with PUD regulations, oras to desirable modifications ofsuch regulations in the particular case, based on a determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to the literal application of such regulations. PUDZ-PL201 70004385; Allura PUD Revised; June 25, 2019 1. Page 13 of '17 9.B.1 Packet Pg. 99 Attachment: Final Staff Rept Allura 7.9.19 (9789 : PUDR PL20170004385 Allura) No deviations are proposed in the request to rezone to PUDR. REZONE FINDINGS: LDC Subsection 10.02.08 F. states, "When pertaining to the rezoning of land, the report and recommendations to the Planning Commission to the Board of County Commissioners...shall show that the Planning Commission has studied and considered the proposed change in relation to the following when applicable." Additionally, Section 10.02.13 of the Collier County LDC requires the Planning Commission to make findings as to the PUD Master Plans' compliance with the additional criteria as also noted below: (Zoning Division staff responses in non-bold): 1. Whether the proposed change will be consistentwith the goals, objectives, and policies of the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) and the elements of the GMP. Comprehensive Planning staff has determined the petition is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the FLUM and other elements of the GMP, if stipulations related to transit shelter location, commercial interconnectivity, and maximum certificates of occupancy, and if the companion amendment is approved. 2. The existing land use pattern. The existing land use pattem related to surrounding properties is described in the Surrounding Land Use and Zoning sectron ofthis report. The proposed uses will not change the existing land use patterns in the area. 3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. The property is zoned Della Rosa PUD and Agricultural. The application is to rezone to PUDR, which would not create an isolated district. 4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. The existing district boundaries are logically drawn. The proposed PUDR boundaries are logical and appropriate. 5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed rezoning necessary. The proposed change is not necessary. It is a request to rezone by the property owner. 6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. This criterion is not specifically applicable as the proposed change is not within a neighborhood. The proposed change, ifapproved, changes vacant to improved land. 7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or PUDZ-PL20170004385; Allura PU D Revised; June 25, 2019 Page 14 of 17 9.B.1 Packet Pg. 100 Attachment: Final Staff Rept Allura 7.9.19 (9789 : PUDR PL20170004385 Allura) 8. create fypes of traflic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak yolumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases ofthe development, or otherwise affect public safety. The Transportation Division states that the roadway inflastructure has adequate capacity to serve the proposed project at this time, i.e., GMP consistent at the time of rezoning as evaluated as part of the GMP Transportation Element consistency review. Operational impacts will be addressed at time of first development order (SDP or Plat). Additionally, the project's development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals are sought. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem. It is not anticipated that the rezone request to PUDR will create drainage problems in the area. Stormwater best management practices, treatment, and storage for this project will be addressed through Bnvironmental Resource Permitting (ERP) with the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD). County environmental staif will evaluate the stormwater management system and design criteria at the time of SDP or PPL. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas, The proposed rezone to PUDR is not Iikely to reduce light or air to adjacent areas. Whether the proposed change will adversely affect property values in the adjacent areas. Property value is affected by many factors. It is driven by market conditions and is generally a subjective determination. Zoning alone is not likely to adversely affect the property values. Generally, market conditions prevail. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. Most ofthe adjacent property is already developed as residential use. The approval of the rezone request from PUD-Agricultural to PUDR is not likely to deter development activity of surrounding property. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasting with the public welfare. If the proposed rezone to PUDR complies with the GMP (if companion amendment is approved) and is found consistent, then it is consistent with public policy and the change does not result in the granting of a special privilege. Consistency with the FLUE is determined to be consistent with public welfare. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. PUDZ-PL2O'170004385: Allura PUD Revised: June 25,2019 Page 15 oI 17 9.B.1 Packet Pg. 101 Attachment: Final Staff Rept Allura 7.9.19 (9789 : PUDR PL20170004385 Allura) with existing zoning. The subject property can be used in accordance with existing zoning; however, the applicant cannot use the property as they have proposed without rezoning to PUDR. 14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the County. The Zoning Division staff determination is the proposed uses are not out of scale with the needs of the community. 15. Whether is it impossible to find other adequate sites in the County for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. The application was reviewed and found compliant with the GMP (if the companion amendment is approved) and the LDC. The Zoning Division staff does not review other sites related to a specific petition. 16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration, which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. Any development anticipated by the proposed rezone request to PUDR would require significant site alteration. The site is vacant, and construction would be required. The development standards would be applied during the SDP and plat process. 17. The impact of development on the availabilify of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance, as amended. The project must comply with the criteria set forth in LDC Section 6.02.00 regarding Adequate Public Facilities (APF) and must be consistent with applicable goals and objectives of the GMP related to adequate public facilities. The concurrency review for APF is determined at the time of SDP review. The activity proposed by this amendment will have no adverse impact on public utilities facility adequacy. This petition has been reviewed by Comprehensive Planning staff for consistency with the GMP as part of the amendment process, and they find it to be consistent if the companion amendment application is approved. 18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare. DEVIATION DISCUSSION: The petitioner is not seeking deviations from the requirements of the LDC. PUDZ-PL2O170004385; Allura PU D Revised: June 25, 2019 Page '16 of 17 9.B.1 Packet Pg. 102 Attachment: Final Staff Rept Allura 7.9.19 (9789 : PUDR PL20170004385 Allura) NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING NIM): The applicant conducted a NIM on September 6, 2019,5:30 PM, at the Collier County Public Library Headquarters Sugden Theater at 2385 Orange Blossom Naples, FL. For further information, please see the NIM Summary information in the back-up material. ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL (EAO RECOMMENDATION: This project does not require Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) review, as this project did not meet the EAC scope of land development project reviews as identified in Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Codes of Laws and Ordinances. COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The County Attomey's Office has reviewed this staff report for content and legal sufficiency. RECOMMENDATION: Zonrng Division staff recommends the CCPC forward petition PUDR-PL20170004385 Allura PUDR to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of approval, subject to relocating Developer Commitment: 3.C. "Certificates of occupancy shall not be approved for more than 249 multiple-family units until the applicable facilities and/or interconnections described above have been completed" to Permitted Uses: 1.B. following subsection A., the maximum number of permitted dwelling units. Attachments: A) Proposed Allura PUDR Ordinance B) Density Map, Allura Surrounding Projects C) FLUE Consistency Review D) TransportationPlanningConsistencyFindings P UDZ-PL20170004385 ; Al lura P U D Revised: June 25, 20'19 Page 17 of 17 9.B.1 Packet Pg. 103 Attachment: Final Staff Rept Allura 7.9.19 (9789 : PUDR PL20170004385 Allura) DATE ON - ZONING SERVICES SECTION REVIEWED BY: .''n'zr'A RAYMOND V. BELLOWS, ZONING MANAGER ZONING DIVISION _ ZONING SERVICES SECTION ' /44 MICHAEL BOSI, AICP, DIRECTOR ZONING DIVISION APPROVED BY: A-,+ FRENCH, DEPUTY DEPARTMENT HEAD GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT 7-g - , q DATE 7-q -r? DATE 7 - 7- /7 9.B.1 Packet Pg. 104 Attachment: Final Staff Rept Allura 7.9.19 (9789 : PUDR PL20170004385 Allura) 9.B.2 Packet Pg. 105 Attachment: Attachment-A PUD Ordinance Allura-062419 (9789 : PUDR PL20170004385 Allura) 9.B.2 Packet Pg. 106 Attachment: Attachment-A PUD Ordinance Allura-062419 (9789 : PUDR PL20170004385 Allura) Page 1 of 10 H:\2017\2017092\WP\PUDZ\6-18-2019\Allura RPUD Document (PL-20170004385)(6-18-2019).docx EXHIBIT A ALLURA RPUD LIST OF PERMITTED USES PERMITTED USES: TRACT R – RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILY: 1. Principal Uses A. A maximum of 304 multi-family rental dwelling units (8.46 units per acre). 1. Accessory Uses A. Customary accessory uses and structures to residential units, including carports, garages, utility and maintenance buildings, hand carwash area, and garbage and recycling receptacles. B. Community clubhouse, indoor and outdoor recreational uses and facilities such as swimming pools, tennis courts, pickle ball courts, bocce ball courts, volleyball courts, walking paths, picnic areas, dog parks, playgrounds, fitness centers, and community administration. These uses shall be permitted throughout the R designated areas of the PUD. C. Temporary sales trailers and model units, subject to LDC Section 5.04.05, as applicable. D. Entry gates and gatehouses. E. Stormwater management treatment facilities, conveyance facilities, and structures, such as berms, swales, and outfall structures. F. Parking structures. TRACT P – PRESERVE: 1. Principal Uses A. Preservation of native habitat. 2. Accessory Uses A. Uses identified in and subject to the requirements and conditions set forth in LDC Section 3.05.07.H.1.h., Allowable uses within County required preserves. 9.B.2 Packet Pg. 107 Attachment: Attachment-A PUD Ordinance Allura-062419 (9789 : PUDR PL20170004385 Allura) Page 2 of 10 H:\2017\2017092\WP\PUDZ\6-18-2019\Allura RPUD Document (PL-20170004385)(6-18-2019).docx EXHIBT B ALLURA RPUD DEVLOPMENT AND DESIGN STANDARDS The table below sets forth the development standards for the RPUD. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or subdivision plat, as the case may be. 1. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS STANDARD MULTI-FAMILY COMMUNITY RECREATION FACILITIES PRINCIPAL STRUCTURES MIN. LOT AREA 10,000 S.F. N/A MIN. LOT WIDTH 100 FEET N/A MIN. FLOOR AREA 650 S.F./D.U. N/A MINUMUM REQUIRED YARDS FROM LIVINGSTON ROAD 50 FEET 50 FEET FROM VETERANS MEMORIAL BLVD. 40 FEET 40 FEET FROM THE EASTERN PERIMETER BOUNDARY 125 FEET 125 FEET FROM ALL OTHER PUD PERIMETER BOUNDARIES 20 FEET 20 FEET FROM PRESERVE 25 FEET 25 FEET FROM WATERBODY 1 0 FEET 0 FEET MIN. DISTANCE BETWEEN STRUCTURES 20 FEET 20 FEET MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT NOT TO EXCEED (ZONED) 2 3-STORY 40 FEET 35 FEET MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT NOT TO EXCEED (ACTUAL) 2 3-STORY 50 FEET 42 FEET ACCESSORY STRUCTURES FROM LIVINGSTON ROAD 50 FEET 3 N/A FROM VETERANS MEMORIAL BLVD. 40 FEET 3 N/A FROM ALL OTHER PUD PERIMETER BOUNDARIES 15 FEET N/A FROM PRESERVE 10 FEET N/A MIN. DISTANCE BETWEEN STRUCTURES 10 FEET N/A MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT NOT TO EXCEED (ZONED) 35 FEET 4 N/A MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT NOT TO EXCEED (ACTUAL) 42 FEET 4 N/A 1. Measured from lake maintenance easement or bulkhead. 2. Inclusive of any under building parking. 3. For one-story parking structures, garages, carports and trash compactor enclosures, which do not exceed 15 feet Zoned and 20 feet Actual height, the setback from Livingston Road and Veteran’s Memorial Blvd. shall be 20 feet. 4. The maximum actual height for parking structures is limited to 35 feet. 9.B.2 Packet Pg. 108 Attachment: Attachment-A PUD Ordinance Allura-062419 (9789 : PUDR PL20170004385 Allura) Page 3 of 10 H:\2017\2017092\WP\PUDZ\6-18-2019\Allura RPUD Document (PL-20170004385)(6-18-2019).docx 2. DESIGN STANDARDS A. PUD access points shall be gated. B. Buildings shall be constructed with Concrete Masonry Unit construction or concrete construction. C. Roofs shall be cement or slate tile roof or approved equivalent (asphalt shingles prohibited). 9.B.2 Packet Pg. 109 Attachment: Attachment-A PUD Ordinance Allura-062419 (9789 : PUDR PL20170004385 Allura) Page 4 of 10 H:\2017\2017092\WP\PUDZ\6-18-2019\Allura RPUD Document (PL-20170004385)(6-18-2019).docx EXHIBT C PUD MASTER PLAN 9.B.2 Packet Pg. 110 Attachment: Attachment-A PUD Ordinance Allura-062419 (9789 : PUDR PL20170004385 Allura) Page 5 of 10 H:\2017\2017092\WP\PUDZ\6-18-2019\Allura RPUD Document (PL-20170004385)(6-18-2019).docx 9.B.2Packet Pg. 111Attachment: Attachment-A PUD Ordinance Allura-062419 (9789 : PUDR PL20170004385 Allura) Page 6 of 10 H:\2017\2017092\WP\PUDZ\6-18-2019\Allura RPUD Document (PL-20170004385)(6-18-2019).docx EXHIBIT D ALLURA RPUD LEGAL DESCRPTION PARCEL 1 - OR 3876 PG 1542 THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA ALSO KNOWN AS LOT 11 IN UNRECORDED BRYAN ACRES SUBDIVISION. PARCEL 2 - OR 3876 PG 1546 THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 48, SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS THE WESTERLY 15 FEET THEREOF, PARCEL 3 - OR 4744 PG 3049 THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (NE 1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW 1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW 1/4) OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (NE 1/4) SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS THE WEST THIRTY (30) FEET THEREOF RESERVED FOR ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY PURPOSES, SHOWN AS TRACT #2 OF UNRECORDED PLAT OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER. PARCEL 4 - OR 3675 PG 1026 THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER (NW1/4) OF THE NORTHEAST ONE-QUARTER (NE1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER (NW1/4) OF THE NORTHEAST ONE- QUARTER (NE1/4) OF SECTION, 13, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. PARCEL 5 - OR 4908 PG 204 THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER; AND THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER, OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER, SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. PARCELS 6 - OR 4596 PG 980 THE WEST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. 9.B.2 Packet Pg. 112 Attachment: Attachment-A PUD Ordinance Allura-062419 (9789 : PUDR PL20170004385 Allura) Page 7 of 10 H:\2017\2017092\WP\PUDZ\6-18-2019\Allura RPUD Document (PL-20170004385)(6-18-2019).docx THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. AND THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. PARCEL 7 - OR 4865 PG 2180 THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. PARCEL 8 - OR 5601 PG 1876 THE WESTERLY FIFTEEN (15) FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 48, SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. PARCEL 9 - OR 5522 PG 1562 THE WEST THIRTY (30) FEET OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (NE 1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW 1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW 1/4) OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (NE 1/4) SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. CONTAINING 1,564,706 SQUARE FEET OR 35.92 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. 9.B.2 Packet Pg. 113 Attachment: Attachment-A PUD Ordinance Allura-062419 (9789 : PUDR PL20170004385 Allura) Page 8 of 10 H:\2017\2017092\WP\PUDZ\6-18-2019\Allura RPUD Document (PL-20170004385)(6-18-2019).docx EXHIBIT E ALLURA RPUD DEVIATIONS No deviations from the LDC are requested. 9.B.2 Packet Pg. 114 Attachment: Attachment-A PUD Ordinance Allura-062419 (9789 : PUDR PL20170004385 Allura) Page 9 of 10 H:\2017\2017092\WP\PUDZ\6-18-2019\Allura RPUD Document (PL-20170004385)(6-18-2019).docx EXHIBIT F ALLURA RPUD DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS 1. PLANNING A. One entity (hereinafter the Managing Entity) shall be responsible for PUD monitoring until close-out of the PUD, and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUD commitments until close-out of the RPUD. At the time of this PUD approval, the Managing Entit y is SD Livingston, LLC. Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity, then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document, to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. After such approval, the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts, the Managing Entity shall provide written notice to County that includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required by the RPUD by the new owner and the new owner’s agreement to comply with the Commitments through the Managing Entity, but the Managing Entity will not be relieved of its responsibility under this Section. When the RPUD is closed out, then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment of PUD commitments. B. Issuance of a development permit by a county does not in any way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law. C. All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained befo re commencement of the development. 2. ENVIRONMENTAL A. The Allura RPUD shall preserve a minimum of 8.37 acres on-site (25% of 33.49± acres of existing native vegetation). B. The Developer shall adhere to the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Black Bear Management Plan, as applicable. The informational brochure created by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWCC) and titled “A Guide to Living in Bear County” will be distributed to future homeowners and construction/maintenance personnel. Residents will be provided with information on how to secure their garbage containers to discourage bears from foraging in trash receptacles and the project will utilize bear-proof dumpsters 9.B.2 Packet Pg. 115 Attachment: Attachment-A PUD Ordinance Allura-062419 (9789 : PUDR PL20170004385 Allura) Page 10 of 10 H:\2017\2017092\WP\PUDZ\6-18-2019\Allura RPUD Document (PL-20170004385)(6-18-2019).docx in locations to be determined at the time of Site Development Plan (SDP) approval. 3. TRANSPORTATION A. The maximum total daily trip generation for the PUD shall not exceed 129 two- way PM peak hour trips, based on the use codes in the ITE Manual on trip generation rates in effect at the time of application for SDP/SDP A or subdivision plat approval. B. The Developer shall make a payment to Collier County for the development’s proportionate fair share of the cost of operational improvements to the intersection of Livingston Road and Veterans Memorial Boulevard. This payment shall be made prior to approval of the first Site Development Plan (SDP) or subdivision plat for this PUD, whichever occurs first. C. The Developer shall provide a minimum of two (2) of the following: i. A transit shelter within the RPUD in a location and design approved by Collier County Public Transit & Neighborhood Enhancement (PTNE) Division; ii. Bicycle and pedestrian facilities, with connection to the abutting commercial property to the west; iii. Vehicular interconnection to the abutting commercial property to the west. Certificates of occupancy shall not be approved for more than 249 multi - family units until the applicable facilities and/or interconnections described above have been completed. D. Developer shall make a payment of $7,524.33 in lieu of providing compensating right-of-way for a turn lane on Veterans Memorial Boulevard. This payment shall be made prior to approval of the first Site Development Plan. 4. LANDSCAPE BUFFERS A. Developer shall install an alternative Type B landscape buffer along the eastern property boundary in the locations depicted on Exhibit C, the Master Concept Plan, and in conformance with the minimum specifications depicted in Exhibit C -1, Enhanced Type B Landscape Buffer. 9.B.2 Packet Pg. 116 Attachment: Attachment-A PUD Ordinance Allura-062419 (9789 : PUDR PL20170004385 Allura) RPUD RPUD Veterans M em orial BLVD En t r a da AV ECorso Medi t erra CI RCabreo DRLearning LN Cellini LN B u o n a s e r a C T Aberdeen AVE Ca m de n L ak es C IRLucarno WAYRa vi n a WAY Ba rcl a y C T Caldera LNMonterosso LN Ce l eb r i t a C T Winfield LN Felicita CTVilloresi WAYZoning: A Zoning: PUD Zoning: PUD Zoning: RPUD Zoning: RPUD Zoning: PUD Zoning: RPUD Zoning: RPUDLIVINGSTON RDDocument Path: C:\GIS\Data Request\GIS Request\Density Map\Allura RPUD Density Map.mxd Map Date: 3/4/2019 Growth Management DepartmentOperations & RegulatoryManagement Division I 0 325 650162.5 Feet MediterraDensity: 0.56 Density: 1 per 5 ac. SUBJECT PROPERTY:ALLURA RPUD GROSS DENSITY UNITS PER ACRE (UPA)ALLURA RPU D ANDSURROUNDING PROPERTIES (PL-2017-4385) Della RosaDensity: 7 RMC-EnclaveDensity: 4.02 BrandonDensity: 3.99 Royal Palm International AcademyDensity: 3.37 Royal Palm International AcademyDensity: 3.37 RMC-EnclaveDensity: 4.02 Density: 1 per 5 ac. C-1 ZONING: A Density: 1 per 5 ac.ZONING: A Marsilea VillasDensity: 2.63 SandlewoodDensity: 3.1 Allura RPUD 9.B.3 Packet Pg. 117 Attachment: Attachment-B Allura RPUD Density Map (9789 : PUDR PL20170004385 Allura) ‒ 1 ‒ 17-4385, Allura PUD to PUD Rezone (PUDR) » Consistency Review Growth Management Department Zoning Division C O N S I S T E N C Y R E V I E W M E M O R A N D U M To: James Sabo, AICP, Principal Planner, Zoning Services Section From: Corby Schmidt, AICP, Principal Planner, Comprehensive Planning Section Date: June 24, 2019 Subject: Future Land Use Element Consistency Review of Proposed Planned Unit Development Rezone PETITION NUMBER: PUDZ-PL20170004385 [REV: 5b] PETITION NAME: Allura Residential Planned Unit Development (PUD) Rezone REQUEST: This petition requests a rezone from A, Rural Agricultural and Residential Planned Unit Development (Della Rosa) zoning districts to Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) to develop a multi-family residential project of up to 304 units of market rate rental housing – or, up to a maximum density of 8.55 dwelling units per acre. LOCATION: The subject property, consisting of ±35.57 acres, in the southeast quadrant of the intersection of Livingston Road and Veterans Memorial Boulevard, in Section 13, Township 48 South, Range 25 East. COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING COMMENTS: The Allura PUD rezone petition is contingent upon approval of the companion Growth Management Plan amendment (GMPA) petition PL20170004419/CP-2018-1. That GMPA will establish the Livingston Road/Veterans Memorial Boulevard East Residential Subdistrict, and was approved on March 26 for Transmittal by the Board of County Commissioners with the following Subdistrict language (in part), followed by staff analysis in brackets: Development in this Subdistrict shall be subject to the following: a. The Subdistrict site shall be rezoned to Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD). [This petition is for a PUD.] b. Allowable uses are limited to multi-family rental dwellings and shall not exceed 304 units of market rate housing. [The PUD restricts dwellings to multi-family rental units and a maximum of 304 units.] c. The RPUD shall demonstrate consistency with FLUE Policy 6.1 by providing two or more of the following: 9.B.4 Packet Pg. 118 Attachment: Attachment-C FLUE Consistency Review Allura (9789 : PUDR PL20170004385 Allura) ‒ 2 ‒ 17-4385, Allura PUD to PUD Rezone (PUDR) » Consistency Review i. A transit shelter within the RPUD in a location and design approved by Collier County Public Transit & Neighborhood Enhancement (PTNE) Division; ii. Bicycle and pedestrian facilities, with connection to the abutting commercial property to the west; and, iii. Vehicular interconnection to the abutting commercial property to the west. Certificates of occupancy shall not be approved for more than 249 multi-family units (a density of 7.0 units per acre) until the applicable faciliti es and/or interconnections, as described above and approved as Development Commitments in the RPUD, have been completed. These provisions, by Resolution 2019-54, were transmitted to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity and the review agencies in accordance with Chapter 163.3184(3), Florida Statutes. REVIEW OF PUD and PUD-RELATED DOCUMENTS: The Allura Residential Planned Unit Development (PUD) Rezone captures the necessary Subdistrict provisions as Development Commitments however, Transportation Commitment 3.C. commits, “a transit shelter shall be provided by the Developer in a location and design approved by Collier County Public Transit & Neighborhood Enhancement (PTNE) Department. The shelter shall be installed prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for residential use or by a later time certain if acceptable to PTNE Department.” Staff points out that such a commitment does not insure a transit shelter will be provided. The subject property is not known to be located on a current or planned transit route, and the ability to provide a transit shelter that would fulfill the requirements of TDM strategies does not appear to be an effective proposal. PTNE personnel commented how an upcoming long range planning process will be updating transit routing in this area, which may include this north-south route. While public transit is of general benefit , it cannot be determined whether a transit shelter would be approved without an analysis provided from the developer. If left written as proposed, Transportation Commitment 3.C. would not qualify as a TDM strategy commitment for purposes of the policy to qualify for a density bonus. Relevant FLUE objectives and policies are stated below, followed by staff remarks. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.6 requires new development to be compatible with, and complementary to, surrounding land uses, as set forth in the Land Development Code. Comprehensive Planning reviewers leave this determination to the Zoning Services staff as part of their review of the petition in its entirety. However, staff notes that in reviewing the appropriateness of the requested uses/intensities on the subject property, the compatibility analysis is to be comprehensive and include a review of both the subject property and surrounding or nearby properties with regard to allowed use intensities and densities, development standards (building heights, setbacks, landscape buffers, etc.), building mass, building location and orientation, architectural features, amount and type of open space and location, traffic generation/attraction, and so forth. 9.B.4 Packet Pg. 119 Attachment: Attachment-C FLUE Consistency Review Allura (9789 : PUDR PL20170004385 Allura) ‒ 3 ‒ 17-4385, Allura PUD to PUD Rezone (PUDR) » Consistency Review The County recognizes Smart Growth policies and practices in its consideration of future land use arrangements and choice-making options. FLUE Objective 7 and Policies 7.1 through 7.4 promote Smart Growth policies for new development and redevelopment projects pertaining to access, interconnections, open space, and walkable communities. The Board of County Commissioners held a workshop earlier in 2019 to revisit these (and other) Smart Growth policies and practices, which resulted with a renewed support for and reemphasis on them. Each Policy is followed by staff analysis and comments [in bold italicized text]. Objective 7: Promote smart growth policies, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and adhere to the existing development character of Collier County, where applicable, and as follows: Policy 7.1: The County shall encourage developers and property owners to connect their properties to fronting collector and arterial roads, except where no such connection can be made without violating intersection spacing requirements of the Land Development Code. [The Allura Master Concept Plan (unlabeled Exhibit C, updated to 4/29/2019), depicts a subject property that fronts Livingston Road (classified as a major arterial road) and Veterans Memorial Boulevard. Veterans Memorial is an unclassified two-lane undivided roadway – where all traffic may enter and exit. The Master Concept Plan depicts connection to Veterans Memorial Boulevard with its main point of “vehicular ingress/egress”. No connection is depicted to Livingston Road. (Submittal 1 document, RPUD Evaluation Criteria, is outdated where it explains how this [project] provides access to both roadways through an interconnected internal driveway system.)] Policy 7.2: The County shall encourage internal accesses or loop roads in an effort to help reduce vehicle congestion on nearby collector and arterial roads and minimize the need for traffic signals. [The “interconnected internal driveway system” are the traffic lanes that link together vehicular parking lots, providing tenants with access to the multi-family residential buildings. This internal access, in combination with TDM mitigation strategy commitments (discussed above), are offered to manage congestion in this area.] Policy 7.3: All new and existing developments shall be encouraged to connect their local streets and/or interconnection points with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless of land use type. The interconnection of local streets between developments is also addressed in Policy 9.3 of the Transportation Element. [The property abuts Livingston Road (to the west) and Veterans Memorial Boulevard (to the north). Application materials (Submittal 1 document, RPUD Evaluation Criteria) express a willingness to “accommodate interconnection” with the vacant adjacent C-1 zoned property to the northwest. The Allura Master Concept Plan (unlabeled Exhibit C, updated to 4/29/2019), depicts interconnection [with a double-ended arrow, labeled for “vehicular ingress/egress”] with this adjoining vacant property (along with an accompanying note, indicating this “interconnection… may be relocated [southward] in the event the adjacent AG parcel is rezoned to commercial.” 9.B.4 Packet Pg. 120 Attachment: Attachment-C FLUE Consistency Review Allura (9789 : PUDR PL20170004385 Allura) ‒ 4 ‒ 17-4385, Allura PUD to PUD Rezone (PUDR) » Consistency Review These connections are part of the TDM strategy commitments required by the Livingston Road/Veterans Memorial Boulevard East Residential Subdistrict (discussed above), under the Review of PUD and PUD-related Documents. The Master Concept Plan does not depict connection with/to the local streets and/or interconnection points in adjoining neighborhoods or other developments to the east or south ‒ where it does not appear feasible to interconnect.] Policy 7.4: The County shall encourage new developments to provide walkable communities with a blend of densities, common open spaces, civic facilities and a range of housing prices and types. [With respect to providing walkability, this Policy promotes development where it is safe and convenient to walk and encourages pedestrian activity. The Allura Master Concept Plan (unlabeled Exhibit C, updated to 4/29/2019), does not depict the arrangement of apartment buildings and parking structures, or the driveway and walkway network connecting them. The Allura RPUD Document, (Exhibit A, updated to 6/18/2019), and Exhibit F, Development Commitments, do not include/address sidewalk, walkway, or pathway – either internal or fronting roadway – commitments. Exhibit E, Deviations, and other submittal documents, however, do not propose deviations from LDC requirements, with respect to sidewalks, walkways, or pathways, which the applicant provides as required per the LDC. Exhibit A, the Allura RPUD Document (updated to 6/18/2019), Permitted Uses, describes various active and passive recreational uses and facilities, including clubhouse/recreation buildings. With respect to providing a blend of densities, this policy promotes projects that offer a range of housing prices and types. Submittal 1 document, RPUD Evaluation Criteria, explains how this development will allow one- two- and three-bedroom market rate apartments. Exhibit B, Development and Design Standards (updated to 6/18/2019), Table 1, Development Standards, does not provide for separate minimum floor areas for the one- two- and three-bedroom apartments. The single standard dwelling unit size proposed is 650-sq. ft. minimum floor area for all apartment configurations. No other submittal documents appear to propose or require that some combination of these different apartment styles and floor areas be provided. It is assumed there will be a mix of unit sizes and number of bedrooms with associated differences in rental prices.] CONCLUSION: Based upon the above analysis, this proposed PUDR may not be deemed consistent with the FLUE. However, the petition may be deemed consistent if and when the companion GMP amendment petition (PL20170004419/CP-2018-1) is adopted and goes into effect. The PUD Ordinance needs to provide for the effective date consistent with the effective date of the companion GMP amendment petition. 9.B.4 Packet Pg. 121 Attachment: Attachment-C FLUE Consistency Review Allura (9789 : PUDR PL20170004385 Allura) ‒ 5 ‒ 17-4385, Allura PUD to PUD Rezone (PUDR) » Consistency Review Stipulations: 1. This petition may only be deemed consistent with the FLUE if the companion GMP amendment petition (PL20180003659/CPSS-2019-1) is adopted and goes into effect. 2. The PUDA Ordinance needs to provide for an effective date to be linked to the effective date of the companion GMP amendment petition. cc: Ray Bellows, Zoning Manager, Zoning Services Section David Weeks, AICP, Growth Management Manager, Comprehensive Planning Section Michael Bosi, AICP, Director, Zoning Division G: Comp\Consistency Reviews\2019\PUDR \\bcc.colliergov.net\data\GMD-LDS\CDES Planning Services\Consistency Reviews\2019\PUDR\PL2017-4385 Allura Con Rev memo_REV5b.docx 9.B.4 Packet Pg. 122 Attachment: Attachment-C FLUE Consistency Review Allura (9789 : PUDR PL20170004385 Allura) 9.B.5 Packet Pg. 123 Attachment: Attachment-D Allura Trans Consistency Findings (9789 : PUDR PL20170004385 Allura) 9.B.5 Packet Pg. 124 Attachment: Attachment-D Allura Trans Consistency Findings (9789 : PUDR PL20170004385 Allura) 9.B.5 Packet Pg. 125 Attachment: Attachment-D Allura Trans Consistency Findings (9789 : PUDR PL20170004385 Allura) 9.B.5 Packet Pg. 126 Attachment: Attachment-D Allura Trans Consistency Findings (9789 : PUDR PL20170004385 Allura) 9.B.5 Packet Pg. 127 Attachment: Attachment-D Allura Trans Consistency Findings (9789 : PUDR PL20170004385 Allura) 9.B.5 Packet Pg. 128 Attachment: Attachment-D Allura Trans Consistency Findings (9789 : PUDR PL20170004385 Allura) 9.B.8Packet Pg. 129Attachment: Affidavit of Sign Posting & Photos of Signs (6-28-2019) (9789 : PUDR PL20170004385 Allura) 9.B.8 Packet Pg. 130 Attachment: Affidavit of Sign Posting & Photos of Signs (6-28-2019) (9789 : PUDR PL20170004385 Allura) 9.B.8 Packet Pg. 131 Attachment: Affidavit of Sign Posting & Photos of Signs (6-28-2019) (9789 : PUDR PL20170004385 Allura) 9.B.9 Packet Pg. 132 Attachment: Legal Ad - Agenda ID 9789 (9789 : PUDR PL20170004385 Allura) From: Smith Frank & Harriet <pgfolks@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2018 6:26 PM To: SaboJames Subject: 450 Unit Apartment Proposal on Corner of Livingston Rd & Veterans Parkway My name is Francis N. Smith and I currently own a townhouse in the Milano IV PUD housing project. I want to voice my opposition to approving a zoning change what will allow the 450 Unit Apartment Proposal on the corner of Livingston Rd and Veterans Parkway in North Naples. While Collier County has intense need for low income housing expansion, there are numerous potential building sites in the county that will not destroy the quiet neighborhoods that are surrounding this particular parcel. The traffic on Livingston Rd is already very heavy and the residents of this parcel will have no choice but to use Livingston Rd to enter/exit their buildings. Much of this traffic will be using the intersection of Livingston Rd and Immokalee Rd which is one of the busiest intersections in the area. Northbound traffic at the Livingston Rd/Bonita Beach Rd intersection currently encounters serious backups at several times during the normal workweek and adding even a portion of the traffic that this project will add to this traffic flow is just bad planning. Exiting Milano onto Livingston Rd North is already difficult because the Southbound traffic is intense and Northbound traffic coming around the bend in Livingston is fast, heavy and dangerous without adding more drivers. Our grandson attended Royal Palm Academy for years and the morning and evening traffic for parents of children attending that school frequently spill out into Northbound Livingston Rd and pushing additional cars into this area will add extensive, unnecessary risk for these parents who have no other choice to deliver their children to the school. Have mercy on those who need to use these corridors to travel either North or South from our neighborhoods. Please, this is not a necessary compromise that will affect all the residents of this beautiful, quiet section of North Naples. This proposal does nothing to improve our community and clearly adds a serous burden to all of us who live here. From: ljvonromer@gmail.com Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2018 11:23 AM To: SaboJames Subject: Allura apt. complex @ Livingston & Veterans Good Morning Mr. Sabo, I have a couple of questions: Why is multi family being considered instead of single family? Neighboring communities demonstrate the demand for single family homes. I recognize that there are mixed single & multi family developments nearby. Then why is such a high density of apartments under consideration? In no way can it be a measure to satisfy low income or even middle income renters as it is being advertised as a high end, resort style community. Perhaps a plan calling for single family & condos should be discussed. I'm sure the developer could make those numbers work just as well @ this location. I am very familiar w highest @ best use of land & long term planning. In this case, I believe this density is not wise or in the best interest of the citizens of Collier County. Best regards, L. J. Von Romer Sent from Windows Mail From: Kathy Messina <petuniajahn@icloud.com> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2018 4:40 PM To: SchmidtCorby Subject: Allura Apts No No No to Allura Apts! DANIEL CORNILLIE <danielcornillie@comcast.net> Allura RPUD To collier county planning commission 91191201810:53 PM My name is Daniel Cornillie, and I live in Secoya Reserve, approximately 1t2 mile west of the site of this proposed apartment development. I attended the public meeting regarding this proposal at the library on September 6 and was appalled by what was presented. Let me explain why: Density: This over 400 unit development would add a population concentration to an area that is already facing serious in-season traffic issues. The delays as the intersection of lmmokalee with Livingston are well known, but a number of times last season at rush hour trafflc was also backed up on Livingston all the way from Veterans to Bonita Beach Road, two miles to the north. High density housing between these two bottlenecks would exacerbate these problems. Compatibility with existing development: The development along Livingston from lmmokalee into Lee County is one or two story homes. The current drive along Livingston is attractive with the housing subordinated to attractive landscaping on both sides of the street. The insertion of this four story complex would be visibly out of place even if it was not of the undistinguished architecture pictured at the presentation. Take a drive here and try to envision this; it's an aesthetic affront. lmpact on property values: This oulof-place development would visually degrade the area to the point where it would negatively impact property values (and the collier county's tax revenue) in the area, as would the insertion of a concentration of rental units into an area of owner-occupied homes. This proposed development is so obviously out of place that it's an insult to the to the surrounding neighborhood, to the Naples "brand," and to collier county. The juxtaposition of this development with the elegant Mediterra is either careless or spiteful. Please preserve the zoning in a manner that precludes anything like this in this area. Respectfully, Daniel J. Cornillie 15843 Secoya Reserve Circle Naples, FL34110 Good Morning, From: Rob Walczak <tarpon569@aol.com> Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2018 7:44 AM To: SchmidtCorby; StrainMark Subject: Allura To those involved, I am a resident of Barrington Cove in North Naples. I purchased early in Barrington Cove due to the location to the schools. I have three young boy that have attended the elementary as well as the middle school. I previously lived in Willoughby Acres. We stayed in the same school district and purchased in Barrington for a newer home and for our kids. My home is on the corner of the project and our pool will face the buildings. I WOULD HAVE NEVER purchased our home knowing that this project was a possibility. We don't need this project as its proposed! Our kids also have a hard enough time crossing Livingston Rd as it is with the traffic and no crossing guards. I work in the fire service and am in and out of similar projects weekly. I also fear the uncertainty of the long term quality of the people who will rent there and the upkeep. With my home on the property line its a HUGE concern. Lets face it this proposed project isn't Bay Colony. It also will decrease my property value with a huge UGLY building and cars against my pool! Please don't allow this project and keep in mind our kids, property values and safety. Sincerely, Robert and Amanda Walczak 16285 Aberdeen Way Naples Fl 34110 From: StrainMark Sent: Monday, November 26, 2018 6:35 AM To: SchmidtCorby; SaboJames Subject: FW: Additional information from 11/20 email RE Stock Development Please distribute as typical. Mark 239.252.4446 Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From: Tim Diegel <timdiegel@mac.com> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2018 6:35 AM To: StrainMark <Mark.Strain@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Additional information from 11/20 email RE Stock Development My address was not listed in the 11/20 email I recently sent regarding the Stock Development. I am a resident of Barrington Cove directly adjacent to the proposed development. Our residents have complained about the loss of their quality of life from this development. I want to point out how the quality of life will be affected due to the creation of new Noise pollution, LIGHT pollution, and AIR pollution. New NOISE pollution will be created from the increase in the “whine” of the traffic increase day and night, specific noise from the autos and motorcycles in the development itself and noise from the normal activities of the residents in the adjacent proposed development. It will be affect us sitting on our lanais. New LIGHT pollution (also known as “light trespass”) will be created from the increase in light from the high positioned street lights and the safety lights attached to the six buildings shining down on to the one and two story homes in Barrington Cove, This light would be seen over any walls or barrier landscaping. Light will affect the circadian rhythm for sleeping in our shift workers (such as nurses) and remove any stargazing in the night sky enjoyed by our residents. My neighbor will have no view of stars in the North or Western skies with his telescope. Many cities in the US and internationally now require the the lights to shine only downward. The International Dark-Sky Association* is a source for this information. Additional AIR pollution will be factor not only from the 2+ year construction phase but also persist from the increase in traffic flow and the “stop and go" of traffic at the near intersection day and night. These changes will be permanent for all of us especially sitting out on our lanais, Thanks for your consideration. Tim Diegel. timdiegel@mac.com *International Dark-Sky Association 3223 North First Ave. Tucson, AZ 85719 Phone: (520) 293-3198 Fax: (520) 293-3192 From: StrainMark Sent: Monday, November 26, 2018 7:47 AM To: SchmidtCorby Cc: SaboJames Subject: FW: Allura Apts Please distribute as typical. Mark 239.252.4446 Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. -----Original Message----- From: Kathy Messina <petuniajahn@icloud.com> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2018 4:39 PM To: StrainMark <Mark.Strain@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Allura Apts No No No to Allura Apts! From: StrainMark Sent: Monday, November 26, 2018 7:47 AM To: SchmidtCorby Cc: SaboJames Subject: FW: ALLURA Please distribute as typical. Mark 239.252.4446 Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. -----Original Message----- From: kathy brown <kathywithakbrown@hotmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2018 8:10 AM To: StrainMark <Mark.Strain@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: ALLURA My husband Joe Brown and I strongly oppose the building of these multi-family apartments due to the inevitable impact on traffic, water, sewer, fire and ambulance runs, crowding of all local establishments and generally decreasing property values in. The area. Joe and Kathy Brown 28540 Altessa Way, #102 Bonita Springs, FL 34135 Sent from my iPhone From: Don McDaniel <DMcDaniel@pmfllp.com> Sent: Monday, November 26, 2018 4:49 PM To: SchmidtCorby; StrainMark Cc: SolisAndy; Don McDaniel Subject: FW: Allura Project Opposition Importance: High Please see my opposition email below: Donald H. McDaniel 16487 Felicita Court Naples, Florida 34110-3263 (504) 905-6238 Email: dmcdaniel@pmfllp.com From: Don McDaniel Sent: Monday, November 26, 2018 3:32 PM To: 'Andy.Solis@CollierCountyFL.Gov' <Andy.Solis@CollierCountyFL.Gov> Cc: Don McDaniel <DMcDaniel@pmfllp.com> Subject: Allura Project Opposition Importance: High Dear Mr. Solis – I’m writing in regards to my opposition to the Allura project, petition #PL- 20170004419/CP-2018-1 to the rezoning so 420 rental apartments can be built on this property. My self and the majority of the people I know are not opposed to single family homes being built in this area. We are opposed to the property being rezoned so 420 rental apartments can be built. The rental apartments will house a minimum of 735 tenants and does not fit into the landscape of this area. Traffic - Immokalee Rd. to Bonita Beach Rd. has no East/West exits for 4.2 miles. Regularly and every week day during season traffic is backed up on Livingston every afternoon for hours from Bonita Beach Rd. south to Veterans Memorial Blvd. and further. To get my son to baseball practice in Bonita I have to go south to Immokalee to 41 then north to Bonita. These 420 rental apartments will certainly add to this congestion. Home Values - Most studies show at least a 12.7% decline in property values near multifamily rental apartments. There is a perceived stigma with apartments having higher crime and less desirable tenants. Whether this is true or not doesn’t matter as it’s the perceived stigma that keep people from buying homes next to rental apartments. Schools – What will the impacts be on the schools? Veterans Memorial Elementary is already at capacity and North Naples Middle School is at 86% capacity. I hope you can support the thousands of residents that oppose a project that is not consistent with the current land uses in the area and will have a negative impact to our investments and quality of life. We would like to continue to support you as our commissioner as you support us. Donald H. McDaniel 16487 Felicita Court Naples, Florida 34110-3263 (504) 905-6238 Email: dmcdaniel@pmfllp.com From: StrainMark Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2018 6:14 AM To: SchmidtCorby Cc: SaboJames Subject: FW: Allura Project Opposition Importance: High Please distribute as typical. Mark 239.252.4446 Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From: Don McDaniel <DMcDaniel@pmfllp.com> Sent: Monday, November 26, 2018 4:49 PM To: SchmidtCorby <Corby.Schmidt@colliercountyfl.gov>; StrainMark <Mark.Strain@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: SolisAndy <Andy.Solis@colliercountyfl.gov>; Don McDaniel <DMcDaniel@pmfllp.com> Subject: FW: Allura Project Opposition Importance: High Please see my opposition email below: Donald H. McDaniel 16487 Felicita Court Naples, Florida 34110-3263 (504) 905-6238 Email: dmcdaniel@pmfllp.com From: Don McDaniel Sent: Monday, November 26, 2018 3:32 PM To: 'Andy.Solis@CollierCountyFL.Gov' <Andy.Solis@CollierCountyFL.Gov> Cc: Don McDaniel <DMcDaniel@pmfllp.com> Subject: Allura Project Opposition Importance: High Dear Mr. Solis – I’m writing in regards to my opposition to the Allura project, petition #PL- 20170004419/CP-2018-1 to the rezoning so 420 rental apartments can be built on this property. My self and the majority of the people I know are not opposed to single family homes being built in this area. We are opposed to the property being rezoned so 420 rental apartments can be built. The rental apartments will house a minimum of 735 tenants and does not fit into the landscape of this area. Traffic - Immokalee Rd. to Bonita Beach Rd. has no East/West exits for 4.2 miles. Regularly and every week day during season traffic is backed up on Livingston every afternoon for hours from Bonita Beach Rd. south to Veterans Memorial Blvd. and further. To get my son to baseball practice in Bonita I have to go south to Immokalee to 41 then north to Bonita. These 420 rental apartments will certainly add to this congestion. Home Values - Most studies show at least a 12.7% decline in property values near multifamily rental apartments. There is a perceived stigma with apartments having higher crime and less desirable tenants. Whether this is true or not doesn’t matter as it’s the perceived stigma that keep people from buying homes next to rental apartments. Schools – What will the impacts be on the schools? Veterans Memorial Elementary is already at capacity and North Naples Middle School is at 86% capacity. I hope you can support the thousands of residents that oppose a project that is not consistent with the current land uses in the area and will have a negative impact to our investments and quality of life. We would like to continue to support you as our commissioner as you support us. Donald H. McDaniel 16487 Felicita Court Naples, Florida 34110-3263 (504) 905-6238 Email: dmcdaniel@pmfllp.com From: Bob Mulhere <BobMulhere@hmeng.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2018 9:25 AM To: philschaengold@aol.com Cc: ryovanovich@cyklawfirm.com; Stephanie Karol; SaboJames; Keith Gelder Subject: FW: Allura project proposed on the corner of Livingston Road and Veterans Memorial Parkway. Thank you , by via this email I am forwarding your email to the County Planner assigned to this project so that it can be included in the staff report and/or executive summary packets that staff prepares for the planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners. Bob Mulhere, FAICP Vice President, Planning Services HOLE MONTES 239-254-2000 Direct: 239-254-2026 Cell: 239-825-9373 From: Phillip S. Schaengold [mailto:philschaengold@aol.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2018 9:14 AM To: Bob Mulhere Subject: Allura project proposed on the corner of Livingston Road and Veterans Memorial Parkway. Dear Mr. Mulhere, I am a year-round resident of the Mediterra community but I was unable to attend the September 6 public hearing in regards to the Allura project proposed on the corner of Livingston Road and Veterans Memorial Parkway. I’m therefore asking that this email be included in the public record noting my opposition to the proposed project would allow construction of a maximum of 420 residential multi-family rental dwelling units. To be clear, I do not oppose additional well planned low- density communities along Livingston/Imperial corridor but I do oppose the introduction of a multi-family rental project into a neighborhood made up of carefully designed communities of single-homes and coach homes. My opposition is based on the following rationale: 1. The Livingston corridor between Immokalee Road and Bonita Beach Road should be preserved to support its current character of single-homes and low-density condominium buildings (coach homes). 2. The addition of a 420 high-density rental apartments project will exasperate existing traffic delays during rush hours at the Immokalee and Bonita Beach intersections. At times, traffic backups at either intersection can reach as long as 1/2 mile from the intersection. 3. Collier County has been successful in preventing the Greater Naples area from becoming the unattractive high-density mess of Broward and Dade Counties. The introduction of a high- density rental apartment project into the Livingston corridor will set a very negative precedent for Collier County and will begin a detrimental rush by real estate developers to introduce rental projects into single-home communities. Mr. Mulhere, thank you in advance for accepting into the public record my opposition to the proposed Allura project for the construction of a maximum of 420 residential multi-family rental dwelling units on the corner of Livingston Road and Veterans Memorial Parkway. I urge the Collier County Planning Committee to reject the Allura application and preserve the character and attractive nature of our community. Thank you. Phillip S. Schaengold, J.D., MBA 15735 Villoresi Way Naples, FL 34110 cell: (239) 300-1278 From: StrainMark Sent: Monday, November 26, 2018 6:38 AM To: SchmidtCorby Cc: SaboJames Subject: FW: Allura Please distribute as typical. Mark 239.252.4446 Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From: Rob Walczak <tarpon569@aol.com> Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2018 7:44 AM To: SchmidtCorby <Corby.Schmidt@colliercountyfl.gov>; StrainMark <Mark.Strain@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Allura To those involved, I am a resident of Barrington Cove in North Naples. I purchased early in Barrington Cove due to the location to the schools. I have three young boy that have attended the elementary as well as the middle school. I previously lived in Willoughby Acres. We stayed in the same school district and purchased in Barrington for a newer home and for our kids. My home is on the corner of the project and our pool will face the buildings. I WOULD HAVE NEVER purchased our home knowing that this project was a possibility. We don't need this project as its proposed! Our kids also have a hard enough time crossing Livingston Rd as it is with the traffic and no crossing guards. I work in the fire service and am in and out of similar projects weekly. I also fear the uncertainty of the long term quality of the people who will rent there and the upkeep. With my home on the property line its a HUGE concern. Lets face it this proposed project isn't Bay Colony. It also will decrease my property value with a huge UGLY building and cars against my pool! Please don't allow this project and keep in mind our kids, property values and safety. Sincerely, Robert and Amanda Walczak 16285 Aberdeen Way Naples Fl 34110 From: StrainMark Sent: Monday, November 19, 2018 5:05 PM To: SchmidtCorby Subject: FW: COMMENT - Proposed Resolution Hearing for Petition#PL- 2010004419/CP-2018-1 I typically forward any received correspondence to the assigned reviewer for whatever case is pending before the CCPC. In this case I believe it is you. More to follow. Mark 239.252.4446 Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From: Anne-Marie Cadwallader <annemariecadw@hotmail.com> Sent: Monday, November 19, 2018 7:10 AM To: SchmidtCorby <Corby.Schmidt@colliercountyfl.gov>; StrainMark <Mark.Strain@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: COMMENT - Proposed Resolution Hearing for Petition#PL-2010004419/CP-2018-1 Dear sirs, My husband and I live in Barrington Cove, the single family, RESIDENTIAL community directly alongside and in back of the proposed 420 apartment complex on the corner of Livingston and Veterans. The proposed six story, 420 unit apartment buildings, six in total, will LITERALLY be in our back yards. Most of our homeowners will look out at six story buildings, instead of the forest, the sky, and the sunsets that we have come to treasure, the reason we bought in this quiet, family neighborhood. OUR HOME VALUES ARE SURE TO DECLINE! Such a mammoth project of rental apartments, on 35 acres on a corner that already has traffic issues, would be out of character, out of place, and permanently disruptive. THERE ARE NO OTHER HIGH RISE BUILDINGS, MUCH LESS APARTMENT BUILDINGS, WITHIN 10 MILES OF THIS CORNER. The only comparison would be the 4 STORY elder care home on the corner of Livingston and Vanderbilt, the 2 STORY Windsong Apartments on the corner of Livingston and Immokalee, and 2 STORY CONDOS in the communities along Livingston from Vanderbilt to Bonita Springs Road. This is a bad idea, poorly planned, with no regard to the homeowners, mostly young families, nurses, first responders, plumbers, and carpenters ( the very people who the County has said they are supportive of). Stock will build these apartments, then sell them as huge cash cow for their company, leaving us with diminished value in our home, diminished quality of life with no view(other than apartment buildings), a three fold increase in traffic at the one of the most congested corners on Livingston, overcrowded schools (Veterans Memorial Elementary and North Naples High School) are at or near capacity already. The 35 acres was zoned and planned for a maximun 178 units, single family homes. To increase the density to 420, rental, is a very bad plan. We are OPPOSED to the Resolution (creating a new subdistrict) and to the Petition #PL- 2010004419-2018-1. Sincerely, Anne-Marie and William Arndt Barrington Cove Naples,FL size=3 width="100%" align=center> Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From: StrainMark Sent: Monday, November 19, 2018 5:10 PM To: SchmidtCorby Subject: FW: Community Petitions opposed to Petition#PL-2010004419/CP-2018-1 Attachments: no-little-miami-on-livingston-road_email.pdf; no-to-allura-420- apartments-rezoning-on-livingston.pdf Mark 239.252.4446 Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From: Anne-Marie Cadwallader <annemariecadw@hotmail.com> Sent: Monday, November 19, 2018 4:33 PM To: StrainMark <Mark.Strain@colliercountyfl.gov>; SchmidtCorby <Corby.Schmidt@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Community Petitions opposed to Petition#PL-2010004419/CP-2018-1 Dear sirs, I am attaching two PDF files that are copies of two petitions recently circulated from September to November, 2018. Both petitions are now closed, and have 1052 signatures combined. The PDF files also include comments by the residents and homeowners on either side of Livingston from Immokalee to Bonita Springs Road. We would like these petitions to be on the record for the public hearing at the CC Planning Commission Board, Dec. 6, 9am, at the Collier Government, 3rd floor. I have also included a link to the iPetitions site, to view the petitions at their origin. https://www.ipetitions.com/petition/no-little-miami-on-livingston-road Petition NO to ALLURA 420 APARTMENTS REZONING ON LIVINGSTON The communities of BARRINGTON COVE, MEDITERRA, THE STRAND, TALIS PARK, VERONA POINTE, CAMDEN LAKES, SECOYA RESERVE, DELASOL, MILANO, CARLTON LAKES are affected and are forming a coalition to bring our opposition to the Allura Apartments project to the COLLIER COUNTY BOARD of COMMISSIONERS, who will be holding a public hearing before they vote on the proposed re-zoning for this property. www.ipetitions.com https://www.ipetitions.com/petition/no-to-allura-420-apartments-rezoning-on-livingston Petition NO to Allura 420 Apartments Rezoning on Livingston The communities of BARRINGTON COVE, MEDITERRA, THE STRAND, TALIS PARK, VERONA POINTE, CAMDEN LAKES, SECOYA RESERVE, DELASOL, MILANO, CARLTON LAKES are affected and are forming a coalition to bring our opposition to the Allura Apartments project to the COLLIER COUNTY BOARD of COMMISSIONERS, who will be holding a public hearing before they vote on the proposed re-zoning for this property. www.ipetitions.com Thank you for your help, Anne-Marie Cadwallader Arndt Barrington Cove Naples, Fl 34110 size=3 width="100%" align=center> Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. This petition has collected 250 signatures using the online tools at ipetitions.com Printed on 2018-09-14 Page 1 of 23 NO to ALLURA 420 APARTMENTS REZONING ON LIVINGSTON About this petition (NOTE: This petition with the collected signatures - the goal is 1,000 signatures or more- will be presented in final form to each of our Collier County Commissioners, and to James Sabo, the Principal Planner for the county's Growth Management Department, both by email as well as by hand.) The southeast corner of Livingston Rd.and Veterans Memorial Parkway in North Naples is under contract by Stock Development to be cleared for the construction of a four story, 420 unit apartment complex, contingent on a successful re-zoning to RPUD. The 35 acres in this wooded lot currently is zoned for a maximum of 107 units, single or multi family. Stock is asking to build 420 units on this acreage, with parking structures that can be three to four stories high. The purchase contract for this land is contingent on a successful re-zoning. WE, THE RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES OF LIVINGSTON RD, WILL BE PERMANENTLY AND NEGATIVELY IMPACTED BY SUCH A HUGE INCREASE IN DENSITY IN THE MIDDLE OF OUR QUIET NEIGHBORHOODS OF OWNER OWNED HOMES. WE ARE OPPOSED TO THE REZONING OF THIS ACREAGE THAT WILL ALLOW STOCK DEVELOPMENT TO BUILD A FOUR STORY, 420 UNIT APARTMENT COMPLEX. Page 2 of 23 Signatures 1. Name: William Arndt (bill.arndt@mail.com) on 2018-09-12 15:38:00 Comments: No Stock here! 2. Name: Richard Lanza (papasurf19@aol.com) on 2018-09-12 15:42:52 Comments: No apartments please! Traffic, transient and overcrowded nightmares will only follow. 3. Name: Garrett Lanza (garrettlanza@gmail.com) on 2018-09-12 15:44:03 Comments: No apartments! 4. Name: Jordan Martin (jordanbmartin@gmail.com) on 2018-09-12 15:44:03 Comments: Do not build 5. Name: Erica Alessandri (aless6874@gmail.com) on 2018-09-12 15:44:58 Comments: Completely opposed to Stock Development plans for rental apartments. 6. Name: Gerald A Nebbia (JERRYNEBBIA@GMAIL.COM) on 2018-09-12 15:45:48 Comments: 7. Name: Dave (davevandermolen83@gmail.com) on 2018-09-12 15:50:23 Comments: No need for apartments in this area of North Naples. This will overcrowd the schools and cause significant traffic issues. 8. Name: Alp Ozsoy (alp.ozsoy@gmail.com) on 2018-09-12 15:50:28 Comments: We cannot let them turn this area of Naples into high transient rental community. 9. Name: Melissa Hemmert (mbh@hlhlawgroup.com) on 2018-09-12 15:50:37 Comments: 10. Name: Brian Hemmert (bthemmert@yahoo.com) on 2018-09-12 15:52:34 Comments: 11. Name: Jennifer Moen (jrkuzie@aol.com) on 2018-09-12 15:58:21 Comments: 12. Name: Matt Moen (matt@moenbrothers.con) on 2018-09-12 15:59:49 Comments: 13. Name: Andrew Starkman (andrewstarkman97@gmail.com) on 2018-09-12 16:01:12 Comments: Page 3 of 23 14. Name: Robert Aufdenkampe (bobaufde@gmail.com) on 2018-09-12 16:05:50 Comments: This is not a development, it’s a small city. 15. Name: Marti Aufdenkampe (maufden@bellsouth.net) on 2018-09-12 16:06:07 Comments: 16. Name: Vincent Benfatti (irenebenfatti@yahoo.com) on 2018-09-12 16:07:05 Comments: The proposed project of rental units off Livingston and Veterans and boarding the Barrington Cove developing has a major deleterious implications on the Barrington Cove and surrounding communities. Descriptions of the negative implicstions are available. Please stop and do not approve this project. 17. Name: Allen Williams (allen@domainrealtygroup.com) on 2018-09-12 16:07:11 Comments: I disapprove of the Stock apartment complex. 18. Name: Cedric pollin (cpollin@yahoo.fr) on 2018-09-12 16:28:00 Comments: 19. Name: Stephen Dorcy (stephen.dorcy@yahoo.com) on 2018-09-12 16:28:23 Comments: If allowed to re-zone this land and increase the RPUD from 170 units to 420 units, which will be made up of 1, 2, and 3 bedrooms units, is really increasing the number of renters in this APARTMENT complex 1,000 people. The location of this development will also attract FGCU students looking for housing. This will not only become a noise problem it will ultimately increase the car count of the renters in the APARTMENT complex to closer to 900 more cars on the roads year round. The re-zoning of this 35 acers is not in anyone's best interest except for Stock Development. Stock is truly destroying this area of North Naples. 20. Name: Margaret Cruz (the2cruzs@att.net) on 2018-09-12 16:44:54 Comments: Please develop responsibly. What Stock is proposing is too much, too fast and not suitable to the direct communities it will impact. 21. Name: Juan Rocha Jaje (jjaje@hotmail.com) on 2018-09-12 16:45:22 Comments: Keep Naples growing under control. 22. Name: Meggie Barboza (barbozajc@gmail.com) on 2018-09-12 16:46:12 Comments: 23. Name: Mariela Rodriguez Estevez (mariela2k@hotmail.com) on 2018-09-12 16:46:26 Comments: 24. Name: Dorothee Pollin (pollinswfl@gmail.com) on 2018-09-12 16:47:17 Page 4 of 23 Comments: 25. Name: Oscar Cruz (the2cruzs@gmail.com) on 2018-09-12 16:48:04 Comments: Not appropriate for this small section of land. Please develop responsibly. 26. Name: Juan Carlos barboza (juancarlos.barboza@arthrex.com) on 2018-09-12 16:53:13 Comments: 27. Name: Sharon Griffith (sharonmcdaniel@aol.com) on 2018-09-12 16:58:22 Comments: 28. Name: Jackie G (jmail34110@gmail.com) on 2018-09-12 17:00:23 Comments: 29. Name: Gabriela Chahwan (gschahwan@yahoo.com) on 2018-09-12 17:02:47 Comments: 30. Name: Nicole Hartwick (nicolemarie05@comcast.net) on 2018-09-12 17:08:18 Comments: 31. Name: Amy loescher (aloescher-yocom@comcast.net) on 2018-09-12 17:10:47 Comments: 32. Name: Ben yocom (ben.yocom270@comcast.net) on 2018-09-12 17:12:45 Comments: 33. Name: Rosie Petisco (Gpetisco@bellsouth.net) on 2018-09-12 17:32:11 Comments: I am opposed to Stock building this community. There are no 4 story buildings (high rises) anywhere in this area. Also, this year’s incoming 6th grade class at NNMS was the biggest class ever. The 6th graders have had to be mixed in with the 7th and 8th grade lockers due to lack of capacity. The impact on traffic, property values and water drainage have the potential of being devastating to our surrounding communities. Please consider building townhouses or coach homes instead of rentals. 34. Name: Ivan L Rosenblatt (ilrosenblatt@earthlink.net) on 2018-09-12 17:37:40 Comments: I am totally opposed to this proposed development. 35. Name: Francis N Smith (pgfolks@gmail.com) on 2018-09-12 17:43:54 Comments: 36. Name: Anne-Marie Cadwallader (annemariecadw@hotmail.com) on 2018-09-12 17:52:41 Comments: Building four story apartment units, 420 units total, is totally inappropriate for the quiet owner owned, low density communities that characterize the neighborhoods on Page 5 of 23 all sides of this proposed project! Traffic would be horrendous! 37. Name: John Healey (Jhealey974@gmail.com) on 2018-09-12 17:59:44 Comments: My move to Naples from New England was due more to the ever increasing demand on services, (Fire, Police, SCHOOLS, and trash removal to name a few) which led to increased real estate taxation due to over development. 38. Name: Judy Watkevich (swflajudy@comcast.net) on 2018-09-12 18:06:16 Comments: There is already too much traffic on Livingston Road. Already a nightmare during season traveling north on Livingston. 39. Name: Alain Coupal (alain.coupal@videotron.ca) on 2018-09-12 18:09:15 Comments: 40. Name: Alvaro Andrade (julianfelipe09@yahoo.com) on 2018-09-12 18:23:06 Comments: 41. Name: Andy Mortensen (Andy@BonitaTitle.com) on 2018-09-12 18:33:16 Comments: I am opposed to changing the zoning on this parcel to RPUD. Rezoning will negatively impact property values for several thousands of property owners in the Barrington Cove, Mediterra, Talis Park, Camden Lakes, Verona, Verona Estates, Secoya Reserve, The Strand, and other neighboring communities. Rental apartments are inconsistent with the current makeup of our communities. 42. Name: Barbara George (barbara520george@aol.com) on 2018-09-12 18:49:30 Comments: 43. Name: Elbert L Lands (elbertlands@gmail.com) on 2018-09-12 19:06:19 Comments: We do not want this renal complex. A negative impact on roads, schools, home value & quality of life in North Naples. 44. Name: Sandra Ritchie (sritchie55@yahoo.com) on 2018-09-12 19:06:53 Comments: NO for this development!! 45. Name: Marc Sier (marcsier@yahoo.com) on 2018-09-12 19:07:24 Comments: No to rental properties at Livingston and Veterns blvd Naples Fl 46. Name: Edward Maron (edward.maron@gmail.com) on 2018-09-12 19:08:33 Comments: 47. Name: Holly Russell (hollyrus@gmail.com) on 2018-09-12 19:10:17 Comments: Page 6 of 23 48. Name: Brian Washek (washekbw@gmail.com) on 2018-09-12 19:10:30 Comments: 49. Name: Giuseppe Carvelli (gsepi57@gmail.com) on 2018-09-12 19:17:53 Comments: 50. Name: Joe Huntt (jwhuntt@gmail.com) on 2018-09-12 19:20:24 Comments: I moved to this location with the understanding that only houses would potentially be built on this parcel of land. An apartment complex of such size is just totally counter to the original zoning ordinance. No to this proposal. 51. Name: Patricia Coffin (patticoffin@comcast.net) on 2018-09-12 19:33:29 Comments: Against the transient nature of small apartments, the enormous amount of traffic added to an already unnavigable Livingston, in season, blockage of Fire Department, over crowding of schools, and misfit 4 story buildings on our residential block of Livingston. Zoned for single family dwellings for a very good reason. Dispite the reteric, 1000-1300 sq ft does not qualify as “Luxery Living”! 52. Name: Deborah Gassner (debgassner@gmail.com) on 2018-09-12 19:48:25 Comments: 53. Name: Patricia Regan (preganregan@outlook.com) on 2018-09-12 19:49:31 Comments: This is way too much density for this area. The traffic in season is already a mess. Also four story buildings would be out of place. 54. Name: Cheryl Maddux (babygirlsam421@yahoo.com) on 2018-09-12 19:52:12 Comments: 55. Name: Nancy Bannerman (nancybannerman@yahoo.com) on 2018-09-12 19:53:45 Comments: 56. Name: Robert Zyblut (robert.zyblut@raymondjames.com) on 2018-09-12 19:54:45 Comments: let Brian Stock live where he builds see how he likes it 57. Name: Julia Spigelman (okmarmie1@aol.com) on 2018-09-12 19:59:35 Comments: This development signifies the amount of greed of this company and its complete disregard for the quality of life for those affected. Disgraceful disgusting that the ruination of communities and natural beauty should be sacrificed for the almighty dollar. 58. Name: Kim Kissel (kkissel45@gmail.com) on 2018-09-12 20:15:53 Comments: 59. Name: J Kissel (jkissel57@gmail.com) on 2018-09-12 20:17:13 Page 7 of 23 Comments: 60. Name: D Kissel (kimsellsswfl@gmail.com) on 2018-09-12 20:17:47 Comments: 61. Name: Sam Spigelman (sarecca@aol.com) on 2018-09-12 20:18:11 Comments: We are already living with the results of Greed generated by DR Horton; do we wish to extend our misery further? 62. Name: Dale Williams (williada89@yahoo.com) on 2018-09-12 20:25:19 Comments: No apartments 63. Name: Elizabeth kostuk (ekostuk58@gmail.com) on 2018-09-12 20:31:23 Comments: No! 64. Name: Tony Gattonet (t_gattone@icloud.com) on 2018-09-12 20:31:31 Comments: Adding this high density apartment complex is not an asset for the communities surrounding our area. for all the reasons cited in this petition. 65. Name: ILEANA SERRA (Ily23@aol.com) on 2018-09-12 20:36:21 Comments: Completely opposed to change our zoning - schools, roads, , value of homes will be affected. Please do not let Stock Development kill the North Naples quality of life. 66. Name: Brooke Lackey (brooke@brookelackey.com) on 2018-09-12 20:55:24 Comments: We living in Barrington Cove and believe a multi-family, high density, rental property will be detrimental to Livingstone Rd and all neighborhoods on it. Livingston Rd currently serves as the one alternate North/South route for I75. It often gets backed up during rush hour any time there are accidents. The additional stress on traffic and schools is not what the Livingston corridor needs. In addition to that, and equally important, I have serious concerns about the safety of my children with a transient apartment complex in our back yard. Stock touts this project as "high rent" but a projected $1400/month rent is laughable and one of the lowest in the county. Please do not allow this project in our neighborhood. 67. Name: joyce broglin (itempro@centurylink.net) on 2018-09-12 21:10:24 Comments: the traffic is crazy now!! we can't take the increase in traffic the apartments would bring. i'm not in favor. 68. Name: Luisa Masella (luisa.masella@videotron.ca) on 2018-09-12 21:13:48 Comments: 69. Name: Sharla Potter (sharpott@gmail.com) on 2018-09-12 21:30:01 Comments: Page 8 of 23 70. Name: Karen Wilkinson (wilkinsonkaren71@gmail.com) on 2018-09-12 21:34:02 Comments: 71. Name: Stephanie Harris (stefkneec@ail.com) on 2018-09-12 21:35:36 Comments: 72. Name: Michele Rearden (m.rearden1@gmail.com) on 2018-09-12 21:41:42 Comments: 73. Name: Jill Mcconnell (jbmccon24@yahoo.com) on 2018-09-12 21:53:33 Comments: No rental prob on Livingston road 74. Name: Emilia Feinberg (emilia.a.feinberg@gmail.com) on 2018-09-12 21:53:55 Comments: 75. Name: Richard Nieves (richnieve@gmail.com) on 2018-09-12 22:03:01 Comments: 76. Name: Richard nieves (rsnow1222@gmail.com) on 2018-09-12 22:05:34 Comments: 77. Name: Patricia Perron (deperron@comcast.net) on 2018-09-12 22:08:11 Comments: No 420 apartment building 78. Name: Nancy Craig (nancyrcraig@gmail.com) on 2018-09-12 22:08:27 Comments: 79. Name: Adrienne Crowley (adriennecrowley@me.com) on 2018-09-12 22:08:53 Comments: 80. Name: David Perron (dperron11@gmail.com) on 2018-09-12 22:22:14 Comments: 81. Name: Marcia Silverman (silverpelican13@yahoo.com) on 2018-09-12 22:32:56 Comments: 82. Name: AUDREY CURRAN (audreycurran11@gmail.com) on 2018-09-12 22:40:57 Comments: 83. Name: Megan Y (palettestudio@comcast.net) on 2018-09-12 22:45:22 Comments: Stop the greed machine!! Page 9 of 23 We had planning in place for a reason. Way to many cars on a infrastructure that is failing is during season. At what point are there so many people here that the roads don't move at all? 84. Name: CHARLES VALERY (CHUCKVALERY1@GMAIL.COM) on 2018-09-12 22:47:26 Comments: 85. Name: Lisa jarrett (lisajarrett24@me.com) on 2018-09-12 23:01:50 Comments: 86. Name: Marie shoaf (shoafmarie@gmail.com) on 2018-09-12 23:08:23 Comments: This is not what Naples is about 87. Name: Micky joy (mjoy1979@yahoo.com) on 2018-09-12 23:15:45 Comments: 88. Name: Vincent Tormey (vincent@dksnaples.com) on 2018-09-12 23:17:48 Comments: 89. Name: Emilie Menard (emadena18@gmail.com) on 2018-09-12 23:31:02 Comments: 90. Name: Elizabeth Pereira (oliveiranyr1@gmail.com) on 2018-09-12 23:50:55 Comments: 91. Name: Dominick Lanza (dpfire82@aol.com) on 2018-09-12 23:53:14 Comments: 92. Name: Bret Haines (neddynips@yahoo.com) on 2018-09-13 00:27:56 Comments: Terrible idea. Totally against this development 93. Name: Julie Cody (julieanne1225@yahoo.com) on 2018-09-13 01:00:24 Comments: 94. Name: Oliver Gendron (olivergendron@yahoo.com) on 2018-09-13 01:12:48 Comments: This construction will congest the roads with traffic, overpopulate our local schools, and have a negative effect on the quaint, aesthetic, appeal of the area. 95. Name: Jose Arosemena Jr (jarosemena68@gmail.com) on 2018-09-13 01:15:06 Comments: 96. Name: Danielle Nicoletta (dnicoletta214@yahoo.com) on 2018-09-13 01:16:39 Page 10 of 23 Comments: 97. Name: Nancy Huntt (n.huntt@me.com) on 2018-09-13 01:20:39 Comments: 98. Name: Grace VanderMolen (grace.e.business@gmail.com) on 2018-09-13 01:22:53 Comments: 99. Name: Nelson Pereira (pereira8@gmail.com) on 2018-09-13 01:31:24 Comments: 100. Name: Stacie Hall (staciem817@live.com) on 2018-09-13 01:49:36 Comments: 101. Name: Bettina Tippett (bettinatip@gmail.com) on 2018-09-13 02:02:43 Comments: 102. Name: Madhuri Terli (mterli@gmail.com) on 2018-09-13 02:03:17 Comments: 103. Name: Amy Carvelli (amyt122@msn.com) on 2018-09-13 02:14:12 Comments: Traffic is already a nightmare during season. Let’s be real. This is going to be a disaster. 104. Name: Kristine (kgajos0907@yahoo.com) on 2018-09-13 02:27:24 Comments: 105. Name: Carol everett (mamanea6@gmail.com) on 2018-09-13 02:31:08 Comments: 106. Name: Jennifer Jordan McGurk (jen_e_j@yahoo.com) on 2018-09-13 02:43:37 Comments: 107. Name: Juan Romano (jromanosells@hotmail.com) on 2018-09-13 02:56:48 Comments: 108. Name: patti fortune (pattifortune@gmail.com) on 2018-09-13 03:10:24 Comments: No to 4 story building. It doesn’t fit in with our community. 109. Name: Charmaine Klein (mainey@carolina.rr.com) on 2018-09-13 03:20:46 Comments: Page 11 of 23 110. Name: dianna albrechtsen (dm.albrecht1@gmail.com) on 2018-09-13 03:54:21 Comments: no pats on livingston and vets hwy 111. Name: Ray Paolino (raypaolino@gmail.com) on 2018-09-13 03:54:50 Comments: Standing with my daughter and her family! 112. Name: Ellen Edelstein (enedelstein@gmail.com) on 2018-09-13 04:48:45 Comments: 113. Name: Debbie Prefontaine (adpre@aol.con) on 2018-09-13 04:51:05 Comments: 114. Name: Joshua Hartwick (joshhartwick@comcast.net) on 2018-09-13 05:39:54 Comments: Build a park not a appartment complex 115. Name: Donna Mazzeo (msiguana@gmail.com) on 2018-09-13 08:32:05 Comments: 116. Name: Allison Pezzuti (ampezzuti@gmail.com) on 2018-09-13 08:55:25 Comments: 117. Name: Erin Laporte (erinllaporte@gmail.com) on 2018-09-13 11:08:59 Comments: Please develop this land responsibly. I’m opposed to the 420 unit / 4-story apartment buildings along Livingston & Veterans Memorial. 118. Name: Whitney Murphy (wnofl@aol.com) on 2018-09-13 11:16:48 Comments: 119. Name: Gus Petisco (guspetisco@ymail.com) on 2018-09-13 11:46:46 Comments: No apartment buildings 120. Name: John Henry (jhenry@prodigy.net) on 2018-09-13 11:59:03 Comments: This proposed rezoning would permit development that would be adverse to the quality of life in neighboring communities 121. Name: Vincent Benfatti (benfattivincent@yahoo.com) on 2018-09-13 12:09:26 Comments: 122. Name: Tania Sciancalepore (taniasciancalepore@yahoo.com) on 2018-09-13 12:10:38 Comments: 123. Name: Elizabeth Guerra (elizabethguerra1@outlook.com) on 2018-09-13 12:15:18 Page 12 of 23 Comments: The elementary school will also be adversely affected by this development. 124. Name: Joe Martin (Joeamartin333@gmail.com) on 2018-09-13 12:25:44 Comments: No to 4 story building. It will cause traffic and other problems to our area. we all must stop it. 125. Name: Susan Steinberg (susansteinberg1@mac.com) on 2018-09-13 12:27:04 Comments: 126. Name: Cindy Sealey (CINDYSHIELDS1229@YAHOO.COM) on 2018-09-13 12:30:54 Comments: 127. Name: Thomas Griffith (tommygriff3@aol.com) on 2018-09-13 12:48:48 Comments: The infrastructure in this area can’t handle this type of development, it will negatively impact the schools and the development is not equivalent to the numerous existing communities in this area therefore negatively impacting this area. 128. Name: Trisha Gasiorowski (trishgaz123@gmail.com) on 2018-09-13 13:01:06 Comments: 129. Name: Dominick Lanza (olddogff@yahoo.com) on 2018-09-13 13:34:14 Comments: 130. Name: Desiree Mortensen (desiree@summitlife.com) on 2018-09-13 14:14:11 Comments: 131. Name: james sealey (gatorvette06@yahoo.com) on 2018-09-13 14:32:31 Comments: Please say NO! 132. Name: Maria Ignacia (neubaw@aol.com) on 2018-09-13 14:45:12 Comments: 133. Name: Roselyn Martin (Roselyndebbie@gmail.com) on 2018-09-13 15:12:14 Comments: 134. Name: Jessica Blair (jma6517@yahoo.com) on 2018-09-13 15:13:21 Comments: 135. Name: Danielle (daniellemslade@yahoo.com) on 2018-09-13 15:31:07 Comments: 136. Name: James Hoover (jlacct1@centurylink.net) on 2018-09-13 15:38:24 Page 13 of 23 Comments: No due to increased traffic. 137. Name: Dante DeCicco (ddecicco2@gmail.com) on 2018-09-13 15:41:34 Comments: No way can this be allowed 138. Name: L DeRose (wderose@verizon.net) on 2018-09-13 15:50:59 Comments: 139. Name: Julie Chilstrom (juliecdts@embarqmail.com) on 2018-09-13 15:54:08 Comments: The traffic on Livingston is horrible now. Imagine adding another 600 vehicles. We'd never be able to leave our homes because we couldn't get out of our development. 140. Name: Laura pascotto (lrpascotto@gmail.com) on 2018-09-13 15:59:21 Comments: 141. Name: Caroline Kissel (carolinekissel144@comcast.net) on 2018-09-13 16:16:54 Comments: 142. Name: Diane Porco (genny951@aol.com) on 2018-09-13 16:26:58 Comments: 143. Name: Laurie Albanos (lba14625@gmail.com) on 2018-09-13 16:35:27 Comments: 144. Name: zannos grekos (zannosgrekos@gmail.com) on 2018-09-13 16:46:02 Comments: I am against anything that changes the current profile of our neighborhood. 145. Name: Amanda Joy (a.amanda40@yahoo.com) on 2018-09-13 16:46:26 Comments: 146. Name: Micky Joy (mjoy1979@hotmail.com) on 2018-09-13 16:47:04 Comments: 147. Name: Maureen O'REGAN (Moeoregan20@gmail.com) on 2018-09-13 17:04:18 Comments: 148. Name: John Albanese (johnjagg@aol.com) on 2018-09-13 17:05:42 Comments: 149. Name: Jennifer Stiefel (jenjane1325@hotmail.com) on 2018-09-13 17:11:21 Comments: Page 14 of 23 150. Name: Cheryl Osmers (cherosmers@yahoo.com) on 2018-09-13 17:12:26 Comments: No to Allura 420 Apartments!! 151. Name: Dan Dapper (gridlockdan@yahoo.com) on 2018-09-13 17:13:44 Comments: 152. Name: Amanda Joy (lovablejeep@yahoo.com) on 2018-09-13 17:23:34 Comments: 153. Name: Robert Walczak (tarpon569@aol.com) on 2018-09-13 17:25:58 Comments: I am a resident of Barrington Cove. I am also a first responder in Collier County. I highly am opposed to the rezoning of the Allura project. I have children at the middle school and we don't need the added burden on both the middle school and elementary. I am in and out of such apartment type complex's through out the week. There is NO BENIFIT to the neighboring communities for ALLURA. Property values, traffic, burden on schools and the future of the complex in several years when it declines. Move it to the East trail... 154. Name: Ellis Cammons (ellis@watersidebuildersinc.com) on 2018-09-13 17:26:34 Comments: 155. Name: Gregory Cheffer (gcheffer@yahoo.com) on 2018-09-13 17:45:16 Comments: Absolutely not!!! Would never have moved here had I known this was in the works. 420 units (1,2,3BR's) @ 4 people per unit (average) equals 1680 tenants. Two cars per unit equals an additional 3,360 vehicles in this small area. Wont work! 156. Name: Joanne Bona (jbona22@gmail.com) on 2018-09-13 17:47:16 Comments: 157. Name: Michael Osterman (mtosterman2@gmail.com) on 2018-09-13 17:48:05 Comments: 158. Name: Alex Rosen (spearfish25@gmail.com) on 2018-09-13 17:49:05 Comments: No to rezoning. 159. Name: Olga Cobb (olgacobb@gmail.com) on 2018-09-13 17:56:53 Comments: NO to ALLURA 420 APARTMENTS REZONING ON LIVINGSTON 160. Name: Kevin Nobis (bonitaketskikevin@gmail.com) on 2018-09-13 18:00:24 Comments: Schools are already at capacity plus this is not good fit for North Naples with the traffic issues we already have. Page 15 of 23 161. Name: Leonard Joyce (lenjoyce@lenjoyce.com) on 2018-09-13 18:01:51 Comments: Not the location for 420 apartments. Even if, should be Condo. 162. Name: John Drake (jedrakeiv@aol.com) on 2018-09-13 18:07:23 Comments: 163. Name: Joseph Ellis (jme0973@gmail.com) on 2018-09-13 18:22:34 Comments: 164. Name: Clayton Rodgers (claytonhrodgers@gmail.com) on 2018-09-13 18:29:08 Comments: Please do not allow this development to be rezoned! 165. Name: Annette Mancini (amancini2@comcast.net) on 2018-09-13 18:33:47 Comments: As residents of Camden Lakes in North Naples, we are totally opposed to this development of multi-unit apartments by Stock Development. If this parcel of land needs to be developed, please develop responsibly. 166. Name: Ann deSelding (adeselding@gmail.com) on 2018-09-13 18:43:28 Comments: 167. Name: Linda Albenga (lindamugs@aol.com) on 2018-09-13 18:44:27 Comments: We do not want 420 apartments on Livingston. Traffic is awful now and I’m sure we will experience tons of grid lock. 168. Name: Laura May (lauramay1962@gmail.com) on 2018-09-13 19:18:37 Comments: NO! All this building is ridiculous. Roads can’t handle more cars. Naples traffic is already bad enough! 169. Name: Nanette Prins (bnprins@yahoo.com) on 2018-09-13 19:20:10 Comments: This complex will cause massive traffic problems and overcrowding in the schools. Also, there are no other four story buildings in the area. keep the area single home. Thank you 170. Name: Nicole Burton (nicoleb0770@gmail.com) on 2018-09-13 19:27:22 Comments: 171. Name: Elgene Doinidis (elgenewd@comcast.net) on 2018-09-13 19:52:54 Comments: We are against the rezoning of this area. 172. Name: Chris Doinidis (chrisdoins@yahoo.com) on 2018-09-13 19:54:26 Comments: Do not approve this rezoning! 173. Name: Yesenia Drake (ymdrake@me.com) on 2018-09-13 19:54:55 Page 16 of 23 Comments: 174. Name: Sharon Phillips (sllmd10@aol.com) on 2018-09-13 19:55:31 Comments: No no no to 420 apartments! 175. Name: Jonathan Kraiza (jkraiza20@gmail.com) on 2018-09-13 19:57:59 Comments: 176. Name: Miriam Means (mmeans1234@aol.com) on 2018-09-13 19:58:10 Comments: 177. Name: Nicole Marc (iwish1972@gmail.com) on 2018-09-13 19:58:16 Comments: 178. Name: Yes (peterjmarco@gmail.com) on 2018-09-13 20:01:43 Comments: 179. Name: Ron bellone (bellonev@yahoo.com) on 2018-09-13 20:06:47 Comments: No 180. Name: Leesha DiPalma (leesha.ellen@gmail.com) on 2018-09-13 20:17:30 Comments: 181. Name: Jen rainey (raineyjmd@yahoo.com) on 2018-09-13 20:20:11 Comments: No to Allure 182. Name: Jennifer Suden (jsuden@gmail.com) on 2018-09-13 20:23:01 Comments: 183. Name: Susan Peters (susanpeters@bestprosthetics.com) on 2018-09-13 20:39:53 Comments: 184. Name: Tom Guthrie (tjtone@earthlink.net) on 2018-09-13 21:15:21 Comments: Do not change the density for this project. 185. Name: Mary Guthrie (maryjudith.guthrie@gmail.com) on 2018-09-13 21:16:24 Comments: No Apartments on Veterans Park 186. Name: Michelle Marks (bellamiamarks@gmail.com) on 2018-09-13 21:43:17 Comments: 187. Name: Barbara Morley (bmorley6966@gmail.com) on 2018-09-13 21:48:02 Page 17 of 23 Comments: I am against this high density, high rise complex. It does not fit the profile of surrounding communities. The traffic is already bumper to bumper and at a standstill heading north to Bonita Beach Road. When is enough ebough. 188. Name: Robert Creviston (bobcreviston@aol.com) on 2018-09-13 21:54:57 Comments: 189. Name: sally king (sally@grizzled.com) on 2018-09-13 21:56:26 Comments: no we do not want the Allura 420 apartments on Livingston 190. Name: Dori Kennedy (dken2001@aol.com) on 2018-09-13 23:15:38 Comments: 191. Name: Bruce and Sabine Hopkins (brucejhopkins@gmail.com) on 2018-09-14 00:35:01 Comments: totally opposed 192. Name: Geraldine Hussey (tipperary1960@gmail.com) on 2018-09-14 00:38:16 Comments: No thank you 193. Name: Joseph Garcia (jjgjr75@gmail.com) on 2018-09-14 00:50:31 Comments: Please do not build this. We have a 3 year old and a baby on the way. We planned to have them go to Veterans Memorial which is near this proposed complex. 194. Name: Natalie Garcia (nggeorge50@hotmail.com) on 2018-09-14 00:56:47 Comments: Please do not build in excess in a location that is only zoned for 107 units. This impacts the environment, wild life, safety of the school in the area, and the safety of pedestrians. There are regularly individuals and families walking, biking, and running, Increased traffic in this area to accommodate over 400 people would increase the risk of pedestrian deaths/injuries 195. Name: Evelyn Widen (exw18@aol.com) on 2018-09-14 00:56:59 Comments: Totally opposed for numerous reasons. If this complex is built, based on the appraisal report, the value of my property will decrease $60,000 since the time I bought it 4 months ago. I purchased this property specifically because of the profile of the surrounding communities, which did not include a transient rental high rise. 196. Name: Catherine Hunt (jimtiahunt@aol.com) on 2018-09-14 01:11:37 Comments: 197. Name: Elizabeth smith (ikatchen911@gmail.com) on 2018-09-14 01:31:54 Comments: 198. Name: Dana Ricard (danaricard@gmail.com) on 2018-09-14 01:32:49 Comments: Page 18 of 23 199. Name: Lance Stahlman II (lstahlman@gmail.com) on 2018-09-14 01:35:24 Comments: 200. Name: Clara crick (cs.hodge@hotmail.com) on 2018-09-14 02:22:29 Comments: The traffic in this area is pretty awful already especially during rush hour times. Schools in the district are at or almost at capacity, and al the homes in the area are single family. This apartment complex would be very unsuitable. Please keep this area zoned for single family. 201. Name: Kris (d4449302@nwytg.net) on 2018-09-14 02:48:37 Comments: 202. Name: Karina Chapman (karinachapman@yahoo.com) on 2018-09-14 02:58:23 Comments: 203. Name: Casey Cook (caseylovecook@hotmail.com) on 2018-09-14 11:20:47 Comments: 204. Name: Jan Cowell (janet.cowell@glhomes.com) on 2018-09-14 11:20:47 Comments: 205. Name: JEFF SHEAR (jlshear@yahoo.com) on 2018-09-14 11:45:26 Comments: 206. Name: Karen Rosen (krosen8@comcasr.net) on 2018-09-14 11:47:40 Comments: 207. Name: Kissel (kim.kissel@glhomes.com) on 2018-09-14 11:55:45 Comments: 208. Name: Roberta Hawkins (roblhawkins@hotmail.com) on 2018-09-14 11:55:55 Comments: Please do not rezoning this property to allow 420 apartments. Traffic, property value, schools will be negatively impacted. Traffic is already impossible during season. The developer should work within the present zoning restrictions. 209. Name: Nicole Woessner (nwoessner@me.com) on 2018-09-14 12:05:57 Comments: 210. Name: MARCI WISSING (ashiashley@comcast.net) on 2018-09-14 12:10:47 Comments: We do not need this excess building constantly going on. The impact on the traffic and resale value of our homes depends on this project not moving forward. Page 19 of 23 211. Name: Dianne Nespoli (diannenespoli@yahoo.com) on 2018-09-14 12:23:16 Comments: 212. Name: Anthony (akc239@gmail.com) on 2018-09-14 12:47:51 Comments: 213. Name: Joe grande (grandejoseph@yahoo.com) on 2018-09-14 13:04:07 Comments: 214. Name: Alyssa Murphy (aelliot26@yahoo.com) on 2018-09-14 13:07:49 Comments: 215. Name: Brett Beecher (brettbeecher@yahoo.com) on 2018-09-14 13:11:37 Comments: 216. Name: Nicole Martin (colee0077@gmail.com) on 2018-09-14 13:18:42 Comments: 217. Name: Diane Shein (nannygale64@yahoo.com) on 2018-09-14 14:22:01 Comments: Do not allow this project to be built! 218. Name: Glen D Myers (myersglen@gmail.com) on 2018-09-14 14:28:44 Comments: 219. Name: Giovanni Blasi (giotriple@yahoo.com) on 2018-09-14 15:01:05 Comments: 220. Name: Cindy Myers (ccmorn@aol.com) on 2018-09-14 15:31:21 Comments: 221. Name: Carole aitken (deasr1@aol.com) on 2018-09-14 15:40:40 Comments: NO TO MORE APTS. 222. Name: Germain Despres (germain.despres43@gmail.com) on 2018-09-14 15:47:51 Comments: The impact to house values and traffic will be devastating. Traffic is already bad. 223. Name: Robert Bolton (rkb9277@yahoo.com) on 2018-09-14 15:51:24 Comments: 224. Name: Don Ivener (naplesman@gmail.com) on 2018-09-14 16:09:25 Comments: Page 20 of 23 225. Name: Janet Bolton (jayleightoo@hotmail.com) on 2018-09-14 16:17:10 Comments: 226. Name: Dorothy Clarkson (dotgc@hotmail.com) on 2018-09-14 16:23:54 Comments: Too much traffic now! 227. Name: Jodi Schulinn (jschulinn@gmail.com) on 2018-09-14 16:37:20 Comments: Please do not allow 420 apartments in an area zoned for 107 units. This is going to be a mess for wildlife, traffic, and local communities already angered by the proposal. There is no reason to crowd so many units into such a small space. 228. Name: Joanne Fluehr (joannefluehr@comcast.net) on 2018-09-14 16:40:58 Comments: The traffic on Livingston Avenue is already horribly congested, especially in the morning and late afternoon. It is often a half hour wait to get from veterans Parkway to Bonita Beach Road on Livingston. This complex will only further congest an already overcrowded road. Please do NOT approve. 229. Name: Carl Armstrong (CarlArmstrong@comcast.net) on 2018-09-14 16:48:54 Comments: I vote no to this rezoning 230. Name: Blake Helgren (zazouweb@hotmail.com) on 2018-09-14 16:55:19 Comments: 231. Name: R Jones (parts@northernoutboard.com) on 2018-09-14 17:03:59 Comments: No to these building plans 232. Name: Adeel Arshed (nodeel98@hotmail.com) on 2018-09-14 17:30:34 Comments: This development is not in character with the neighborhood nor what planners originally wanted for this area. It was zoned single family residential for a reason, so lets honor that! Not only that, a higher density development will result in undue stress on the already capacity public facilities such as the schools, roads and parks in the area. This development has the potential to result in negative perception of the entire community impacting long term property values and eroding the long term tax base. Please vote NO for this high density development. 233. Name: Patrick T (trittp1@comcast.net) on 2018-09-14 17:34:16 Comments: I strongly oppose this development. Will have adverse affect on values of our homes. Negatively impact VME and N Naples Schools that are full now. Liv road is busy enough. 234. Name: Greg Smith (golfrmx@gmail.com) on 2018-09-14 17:37:00 Comments: I vote no! Page 21 of 23 235. Name: Blair Gurick (ylblair@gmail.com) on 2018-09-14 17:43:53 Comments: Please for kids safely , the traffic and our middle school kids Ridding bikes to school with even more cars is so so dangerous - Livingston road is so scary and cars are so fast and to add more with two huge schools right near by is way to dangerous ! 236. Name: Zach Gurick (zgurick@me.com) on 2018-09-14 17:47:16 Comments: 237. Name: Karina Alvarez-Chapman (karina8384@aol.com) on 2018-09-14 17:49:34 Comments: 238. Name: Erin Sarrett (ekjwvu@yahoo.com) on 2018-09-14 17:50:31 Comments: 239. Name: Kristen Potter (kristen.l.potter@gmail.com) on 2018-09-14 17:53:35 Comments: 240. Name: Mary Meichelbeck (6025mmm@gmail.com) on 2018-09-14 17:56:36 Comments: This planned building is much too large for proposed land site, large in structure. Large in human population, large in added traffic. Bad idea fir use of that property and will damage current surrounding properties property value immensely, due to all the large reasons mentioned above. Have any on the hearing committee viewed said property for any length of time? 241. Name: Courtney Trittler (ctritt1@hotmail.com) on 2018-09-14 17:56:59 Comments: Please do not build this!!! 242. Name: Albie Varoski (alvaroski@johnrwood.com) on 2018-09-14 18:10:59 Comments: Thank you for this consideration! 243. Name: Andrew McLaughlin (cheflull@gmail.com) on 2018-09-14 18:22:28 Comments: 244. Name: Martin Kurtz (m2kurtz@gmail.com) on 2018-09-14 18:27:34 Comments: 245. Name: Dominic Mancini (mancinid7@comcast.net) on 2018-09-14 18:33:43 Comments: As a resident of Camden Lakes, I am opposed to having Stock build a 420-unit apartment complex on a parcel of land that is currently zoned for a maximum of 107 units. This parcel should not be rezoned! 246. Name: Brenda Chilstrom (brendaot@gmail.com) on 2018-09-14 18:52:34 Comments: Page 22 of 23 247. Name: Andrew Kowalski (raggedyandy1950@gmail.comI) on 2018-09-14 19:17:44 Comments: I totally oppose the building of an apartment.complex at the corner of Livingston and Veterans Parkway. We do not need anymore students in the at capacity classrooms. nor do we need more traffic in the area. We also need to consider the loss of the habitat for the wildlife that lives there. Find another place to build your apartments. 248. Name: V Price (valmprice@yahoo.com) on 2018-09-14 19:35:13 Comments: 249. Name: Erik Noe (enoe01@aol.com) on 2018-09-14 19:42:59 Comments: 250. Name: Lori Greenlee (Lori2260@comcast.net) on 2018-09-14 19:58:56 Comments: Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org) Page 23 of 23 This petition has collected 632 signatures using the online tools at www.ipetitions.com Printed on 2018-11-18 Page 1 of 52 NO to Allura 420 Apartments Rezoning on Livingston About this petition (NOTE: This petition with the collected signatures - the goal is 1,000 signatures or more- will be presented in final form to each of our Collier County Commissioners, and to James Sabo, the Principal Planner for the county's Growth Management Department, both by email as well as by hand.) (ALSO NOTE: No contributions are asked for or required in this petition! The iPetitions site automatically will bring up a contribution page when you click to sign; the contributions are for iPetitions itself, as it is a free service to all, and runs on contributions. Just click on the "x" at the upper right on the contributions page, and continue to sign.) The southeast corner of Livingston Rd.and Veterans Memorial Parkway in North Naples is under contract by Stock Development to be cleared for the construction of a four story, 420 unit apartment complex, contingent on a successful re-zoning to RPUD. The 35 acres in this wooded lot currently is zoned for a maximum of 107 units, single or multi family. Stock is asking to build 420 units on this acreage, with parking structures that can be three to four stories high. The purchase contract for this land is contingent on a successful re-zoning. WE, THE RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES OF LIVINGSTON RD, WILL BE PERMANENTLY AND NEGATIVELY IMPACTED BY SUCH A HUGE INCREASE IN DENSITY IN THE MIDDLE OF OUR QUIET NEIGHBORHOODS OF OWNER OWNED HOMES. WE ARE OPPOSED TO THE REZONING OF THIS ACREAGE THAT WILL ALLOW STOCK DEVELOPMENT TO BUILD A FOUR STORY, 420 UNIT APARTMENT COMPLEX. Page 2 of 52 Signatures 1. Name: William Arndt on 2018-09-14 20:12:34 Comments: 2. Name: Albert DeLuca on 2018-09-14 20:36:04 Comments: Keep all development to LOW density. Livingston Rd. area is already showing signs of to high density and local traffic. 3. Name: Adrienne DeLuca on 2018-09-14 20:36:54 Comments: 4. Name: Macie Ryan on 2018-09-14 21:02:42 Comments: 5. Name: Colette A Diegel on 2018-09-14 21:27:37 Comments: 6. Name: Crystal Kunsky on 2018-09-14 22:18:16 Comments: 7. Name: Kathryn Brown on 2018-09-14 22:25:14 Comments: 8. Name: Christine Rockhold on 2018-09-14 22:29:28 Comments: 9. Name: Joe Brown on 2018-09-14 22:30:17 Comments: 10. Name: Rebecca Cowger on 2018-09-15 01:24:06 Comments: Please do not allow this change. 11. Name: Susan Benson on 2018-09-15 03:18:13 Comments: 12. Name: Jacqueline Bruno on 2018-09-15 05:55:23 Comments: 13. Name: Joann Salvia on 2018-09-15 10:50:00 Comments: Keep our roads safe. Too many more cars Page 3 of 52 14. Name: Gail Cknry on 2018-09-15 12:52:37 Comments: We do not need the additional traffic and drain on our natural resources. Enough is enough. 15. Name: Angela Gesso on 2018-09-15 13:48:35 Comments: 16. Name: Tracy Mazanec on 2018-09-15 14:13:29 Comments: 17. Name: C Mc Donald on 2018-09-15 15:04:47 Comments: 18. Name: Ronald See on 2018-09-15 15:10:00 Comments: I strongly oppose this proposed development! 19. Name: Jennifer Kane on 2018-09-15 15:39:50 Comments: 20. Name: Luceno Sonia on 2018-09-15 15:44:20 Comments: 21. Name: Dawn luera on 2018-09-15 16:12:09 Comments: 22. Name: Mark Crowley II on 2018-09-15 17:17:55 Comments: 23. Name: Sharon Eddy on 2018-09-15 17:45:18 Comments: 24. Name: Stuart Eddy on 2018-09-15 17:45:52 Comments: 25. Name: Samantha Morrison on 2018-09-15 17:49:18 Comments: 26. Name: Linda Duncan on 2018-09-15 17:57:09 Comments: 27. Name: Deborah Wiefling on 2018-09-15 18:03:11 Comments: I live in Livingston Lakes and we have traffic in this area. Page 4 of 52 28. Name: James Staudt on 2018-09-15 18:13:25 Comments: I knew it would be just a matter of time before Livingston turned into another Airport-Pulling with regard to stop lights and traffic. This would just hasten that clog. 29. Name: Elaine Peters on 2018-09-15 18:31:27 Comments: 30. Name: Leslie gentzle on 2018-09-15 18:32:08 Comments: 31. Name: Mike Gentzle on 2018-09-15 18:46:37 Comments: 32. Name: Ian Burchell on 2018-09-15 18:48:42 Comments: 33. Name: Mary Burchell on 2018-09-15 18:58:43 Comments: 34. Name: Alix Pepler on 2018-09-15 19:02:09 Comments: 35. Name: Shana Helsel on 2018-09-15 19:02:43 Comments: 36. Name: Kathryn Litow on 2018-09-15 19:08:25 Comments: 37. Name: Valerie Parker on 2018-09-15 19:12:59 Comments: 38. Name: Adrian Bocwinski on 2018-09-15 20:47:26 Comments: 39. Name: Denise on 2018-09-15 21:14:40 Comments: 40. Name: Kristin Bocwinski on 2018-09-15 21:14:40 Comments: 41. Name: Steven Cassara on 2018-09-15 22:06:51 Page 5 of 52 Comments: 42. Name: Melissa wychocki on 2018-09-16 00:02:00 Comments: We are against this high density project in a very busy school zone and where a high school may very well be added too. 43. Name: Nancy Crosby on 2018-09-16 02:12:44 Comments: 44. Name: Charmin Tillman on 2018-09-16 02:45:21 Comments: 45. Name: Debbie Delahanty on 2018-09-16 02:49:26 Comments: We do NOT need or want this right here!! 46. Name: Darin Hovis on 2018-09-16 11:45:41 Comments: 47. Name: Susan Flynn on 2018-09-16 13:31:22 Comments: 48. Name: Cristina Dröscher on 2018-09-16 14:18:47 Comments: No more 49. Name: Jerry ONeil on 2018-09-16 14:54:28 Comments: NO to Allure Apts on Livingston Rd 50. Name: Betty Kampfer on 2018-09-16 15:24:42 Comments: 51. Name: Elizabeth Haines on 2018-09-16 16:36:36 Comments: 52. Name: Richard Ritchie on 2018-09-16 20:25:26 Comments: As I previous city planner I vehemently oppose this project. 53. Name: Jason Moore on 2018-09-16 23:28:04 Comments: 54. Name: Lisle Anderson on 2018-09-16 23:40:22 Comments: We are against this high density project in a very busy school zone, In addition, Livingston Road is not able to handle the current traffic. Adding a high density Page 6 of 52 development would be a major mistake. 55. Name: Elizabeth Morris on 2018-09-17 01:16:22 Comments: 56. Name: David Morris on 2018-09-17 01:17:11 Comments: 57. Name: Mark hill on 2018-09-17 10:53:13 Comments: We do not need more traffic. 58. Name: Rose Branda McLaughlin on 2018-09-17 13:21:15 Comments: Opposed to this overdevelopment 59. Name: David Eischens on 2018-09-17 19:22:13 Comments: I am opposed to this extreme high density dwelling from the developer. 60. Name: Marcia Pardue on 2018-09-17 19:24:16 Comments: No, no, no and no. 61. Name: Jan Jankowski on 2018-09-17 19:30:25 Comments: 62. Name: Cheryl Childress on 2018-09-17 19:31:03 Comments: 63. Name: Ronald Childress on 2018-09-17 19:33:49 Comments: 64. Name: Jack Carroo on 2018-09-17 19:59:39 Comments: No 65. Name: Mary Gail Gerebenics on 2018-09-17 20:37:07 Comments: 66. Name: Brandi Kimm on 2018-09-17 22:16:49 Comments: 67. Name: Elizabeth Pereira on 2018-09-18 00:22:15 Comments: 68. Name: Amy mackenzie on 2018-09-18 01:25:01 Page 7 of 52 Comments: 69. Name: William E O'Reilly on 2018-09-18 10:11:19 Comments: I Vote NO to Allura Apartments Rezoning on Livingston. 70. Name: Leonard Raiffie on 2018-09-18 12:55:15 Comments: Do not want to change the area with heavy density housing for the benefit of one builder. 71. Name: Peter A Krajewski on 2018-09-18 15:29:53 Comments: The county is saying a traffic study was conducted and this development would not have any negative effects on traffic flow. The study was conducted for the original intent of the development, 107 single family homes. The new proposal also does not take into account the water shed issue that is going to happen because of all the additional asphalt and hardscape. No thank you for many other reasons as well that the developer and county are hiding behind. 72. Name: Anastasia karlis on 2018-09-18 16:07:01 Comments: Traffic and property value concerns! 73. Name: Robert Lopes on 2018-09-18 16:22:07 Comments: Too much density for the area. you're dumping 420 units next to large single family development./ 74. Name: John Benedik on 2018-09-18 16:30:05 Comments: 75. Name: Steve Berke on 2018-09-18 17:21:36 Comments: 76. Name: Richard Wirth on 2018-09-18 17:22:50 Comments: Traffic on Livingston is a disaster already in high season December through April. High density housing will hurt our Strand property values. I say no way to the rezoning request. 77. Name: Jeff and Ronni Kershaw on 2018-09-18 17:41:32 Comments: Tired of over development!! Too much traffic. Over burdening all our services: sewage, clean water, garbage, no parking at beach, downtown... it is getting crazy out there. Plus, a tax for storm water runoff caused by too much concrete being poured for new buildings, parking lots. Are all our commissioners in the developers pockets? Pissed! 78. Name: Arnold Saslavsky on 2018-09-18 18:52:33 Page 8 of 52 Comments: Inappropriate in size and scope for this area for the many reasons already stated. 79. Name: Tiffany Matteau on 2018-09-18 19:36:12 Comments: 80. Name: Joy Boatman on 2018-09-18 20:16:08 Comments: 81. Name: Priscilla on 2018-09-18 20:45:06 Comments: 82. Name: Robert Parker on 2018-09-18 21:46:05 Comments: No to Allura 420 ! 83. Name: Rolene Peck on 2018-09-18 22:08:40 Comments: 84. Name: Lindsey Pettit on 2018-09-18 22:11:37 Comments: 85. Name: Roberta on 2018-09-19 00:13:19 Comments: No to Allura 420 apartments rezoning on Livingston 86. Name: Eduardo Guarnizo on 2018-09-19 00:42:24 Comments: 87. Name: Ken Kleban on 2018-09-19 01:40:40 Comments: 88. Name: Steven Newstead on 2018-09-19 03:12:27 Comments: 89. Name: Ken Katzif on 2018-09-19 03:15:48 Comments: This construction is totally out of character with the surrounding developments. It would increase traffic significantly in this area. 90. Name: Bruce Glazier on 2018-09-19 03:20:24 Comments: Too much density for the area 91. Name: Jim castellano on 2018-09-19 03:23:43 Comments: Page 9 of 52 92. Name: Sherri Newstead on 2018-09-19 03:30:32 Comments: 93. Name: Vicki Raiffie on 2018-09-19 03:55:26 Comments: Too much traffic! 94. Name: Beth on 2018-09-19 04:52:04 Comments: I oppose this development for a 420 rental apartment complex. This project does not fit into the surrounding community and will negatively impact the home values and traffic. 95. Name: ron kohn on 2018-09-19 12:01:32 Comments: 96. Name: Kenneth Brown on 2018-09-19 12:07:03 Comments: 97. Name: Joan Lebon on 2018-09-19 13:19:13 Comments: No to these apartments going in on Livingston! 98. Name: Sally Katzif on 2018-09-19 13:46:11 Comments: 99. Name: Susan Kravetz on 2018-09-19 13:57:57 Comments: Not needed 100. Name: Alan Lebon on 2018-09-19 14:26:13 Comments: Naple’s uniqueness is it’s obvious goal to remain pristine and beautiful. Even 41 has been well managed. Please don’t start a trend making Naples look more like Ft Meyers or Ft Lauderdale 101. Name: Jim Falcione on 2018-09-19 14:30:24 Comments: All the previous comments state the obvious and dont need to reiterate. 102. Name: Karen Faye on 2018-09-19 14:34:13 Comments: I am against this project! 103. Name: Kimberly Bettegnies on 2018-09-19 14:34:41 Comments: 104. Name: Paula Gabriele on 2018-09-19 14:40:28 Page 10 of 52 Comments: I vote NO 105. Name: Scott Peterson on 2018-09-19 14:51:51 Comments: Livingston road is already overloaded. During season, especially if accidents occur (daily) on I-75, livingston road is backed up from immokalee to bonita beach rd. The density of an apt complex in the middle of this area would cause enormous chaos, accidents and additional problems unless alternate roads are built. 106. Name: Jason Sawicki on 2018-09-19 14:59:05 Comments: 107. Name: Michael Speichert on 2018-09-19 15:07:32 Comments: 108. Name: Donna Goyette on 2018-09-19 15:08:27 Comments: No. With three schools in that 1/2 mile vicinity, it would not only be a traffic issue but a safety issue for the kids. 109. Name: Robert Stewart on 2018-09-19 15:10:44 Comments: 110. Name: Pete Pisarri on 2018-09-19 15:13:28 Comments: 111. Name: Kamila Gentry on 2018-09-19 15:25:48 Comments: Strongly apposed to this project in this location. NO to this proposed rezoning. 112. Name: Raymond Minutolo on 2018-09-19 15:31:15 Comments: 113. Name: Andrea Minutolo on 2018-09-19 15:32:26 Comments: 114. Name: Howard Fragin on 2018-09-19 15:33:38 Comments: 115. Name: Monica Mix on 2018-09-19 15:41:22 Comments: 116. Name: Thomas j Flynn on 2018-09-19 15:41:26 Comments: Page 11 of 52 117. Name: Ken on 2018-09-19 15:50:17 Comments: 118. Name: Ken on 2018-09-19 15:51:29 Comments: 119. Name: Andrew Gorman on 2018-09-19 16:12:42 Comments: 120. Name: Daniel J Cornillie on 2018-09-19 16:13:50 Comments: This proposed development is grossly out of place in density and character 121. Name: Nancy Cornillie on 2018-09-19 16:23:06 Comments: 122. Name: Lisa Kohn on 2018-09-19 16:35:59 Comments: There are already too many displaced wild life due to all the construction thus far. Let us not become the next Miami! 123. Name: Peggy Brown on 2018-09-19 17:31:23 Comments: 124. Name: Secoya resident on 2018-09-19 17:32:16 Comments: 125. Name: THOMAS J JORDAN on 2018-09-19 17:45:33 Comments: 126. Name: Michele Hill on 2018-09-19 18:18:48 Comments: 127. Name: Karen Sedlacik on 2018-09-19 18:48:17 Comments: 128. Name: Kim Lomas on 2018-09-19 19:30:19 Comments: 129. Name: Lauris Turck on 2018-09-19 19:40:12 Comments: Thought there was a storm water run off problem. If yes more development makes no sense does it! 130. Name: John Blaine on 2018-09-19 19:47:15 Page 12 of 52 Comments: 131. Name: Lisa Sulen on 2018-09-19 19:50:58 Comments: 132. Name: mark voll on 2018-09-19 19:54:21 Comments: 133. Name: Barbara Gattone on 2018-09-19 19:57:38 Comments: We do nit need any high density housing next to our community. The schools can't handle it and the roads are challenged today trying to cope with present day traffic at the peak times of the day. 134. Name: Jean clark on 2018-09-19 20:03:45 Comments: No on zoning 135. Name: Robert Walczak on 2018-09-19 20:16:51 Comments: NO to the new proposed 4 stories!!!! 136. Name: Robert Wagner on 2018-09-19 20:20:33 Comments: Thank you for this opportunity to be heard from on this project. I am definitely opposed. 137. Name: Kim Zyblut on 2018-09-19 20:21:31 Comments: 138. Name: Debbie Delahanty on 2018-09-19 20:25:32 Comments: 139. Name: Jeremy Domin on 2018-09-19 20:28:52 Comments: This project needs to be reduced to eliminate a 4 story building to make it no more than 2. 140. Name: KATHRYN KELLAR on 2018-09-19 20:37:32 Comments: 141. Name: Jane Carroo on 2018-09-19 20:47:29 Comments: This is totally unacceptable! I do not understand why Collier County would consider rezoning to a high density development in this area. 142. Name: john campbell on 2018-09-19 21:07:38 Comments: Page 13 of 52 143. Name: Brandon Higdon on 2018-09-19 21:13:57 Comments: 144. Name: Gaynor Treacy on 2018-09-19 21:14:42 Comments: A lovely community. They don't need this mini high rise. 145. Name: Ethan Higdon on 2018-09-19 21:15:11 Comments: 146. Name: Frank Sulen on 2018-09-19 21:16:33 Comments: 147. Name: Ronald Treacy on 2018-09-19 21:17:33 Comments: Not needed here. Will be unsitely. 148. Name: Charlene Minett on 2018-09-19 21:45:45 Comments: I feel the condos would lower our property values 149. Name: Eugene Ellis on 2018-09-19 21:54:18 Comments: Traffic congestion would be terrible. 150. Name: Karen Ellis on 2018-09-19 21:58:40 Comments: 151. Name: Eileen LaMacchia on 2018-09-19 22:09:44 Comments: TOTALLY OPPOSED!!! Traffic would be worse on Livingston Road. Why can't Naples keep its trees? Too much being bought up by developers. 152. Name: Mariela Rocha Jaje on 2018-09-19 22:48:16 Comments: 153. Name: Mary Ann Wagner on 2018-09-19 23:18:29 Comments: I am glad we have a voice. Thank you 154. Name: Susan Stephens on 2018-09-19 23:43:21 Comments: I am opposed to this construction in North Naples. 155. Name: R OTERI on 2018-09-20 00:19:51 Comments: NO 156. Name: B OTERI on 2018-09-20 00:22:35 Page 14 of 52 Comments: NO 157. Name: Judith Zamarro on 2018-09-20 00:26:23 Comments: 158. Name: Naomi hansen on 2018-09-20 00:31:24 Comments: Please reconsider Turing our beautiful area into a concrete jungle. We moved here because of the peaceful atmosphere. We cannot overbuild it will create more damage and flooding during storms, etc. thank you. 159. Name: Jennifer Narrell on 2018-09-20 01:47:53 Comments: 160. Name: Jason Levin on 2018-09-20 01:50:03 Comments: 161. Name: Natasha Genevro on 2018-09-20 03:07:41 Comments: 162. Name: Robin Gray on 2018-09-20 03:54:53 Comments: 163. Name: David L Rogers on 2018-09-20 04:34:52 Comments: 164. Name: Ryan Gray on 2018-09-20 09:05:51 Comments: 165. Name: Leon J Kravetz on 2018-09-20 09:30:54 Comments: Against the passage of the petition. 166. Name: Keri Mueller on 2018-09-20 10:20:13 Comments: 167. Name: Stacey Cosentino on 2018-09-20 11:34:08 Comments: 168. Name: Sarah on 2018-09-20 12:13:18 Comments: 169. Name: Francis N Smith on 2018-09-20 13:16:24 Comments: Page 15 of 52 170. Name: Eric Narrell on 2018-09-20 14:12:06 Comments: 171. Name: Bruce Gray on 2018-09-20 14:27:07 Comments: 172. Name: Jerome Gulvas on 2018-09-20 14:47:14 Comments: We do NOT need apartments built in this area. Not only will it lower our home values, it will create a LOT more traffic in a small area for our children that is already NOT a school zone. Having little sections of preserve/habitat is not a bad thing. 173. Name: Judy Young on 2018-09-20 14:55:24 Comments: 174. Name: Kathleen Gulvas on 2018-09-20 15:00:52 Comments: The area is currently zoned for a maximum of 107 units for a reason. There's already so much congestion in the area. And it's important our communities along Livingston Road ban together to maintain the level of value: Mediterra, Talis Park, Secoya, Camden Lakes, Barrington Cove, Verona Pointe Estates, etc. 175. Name: Linda Krajewski on 2018-09-20 15:08:37 Comments: NO to the re-zoning of this RPUD!! 420 units would add at least 840 additional cars on the road. The area around the school is already a hazard to the kids and families attending that school. Also, let the wildlife have somewhere else to live besides roaming our neighborhoods. 176. Name: Joseph Banfield on 2018-09-20 15:09:26 Comments: 177. Name: Makenzie Schutt on 2018-09-20 15:13:09 Comments: 178. Name: Sean Wells on 2018-09-20 15:22:12 Comments: Do not build! 179. Name: Sharon Rogers on 2018-09-20 15:32:20 Comments: 180. Name: Howard Frankel on 2018-09-20 15:43:29 Comments: Do not allow a zoning modification. 4 story apartment and parking structures is not appropriate for this area, as reflected in the zoning that limits density to 107 units. Page 16 of 52 181. Name: Jennifer postell on 2018-09-20 15:44:03 Comments: 182. Name: Darren Allison on 2018-09-20 15:53:00 Comments: 183. Name: Chandler Green on 2018-09-20 15:58:50 Comments: This parcel should not be re-zoned. During season traffic backs up from Bonita Beach Road to Veterans Memorial. This density in our area isn't acceptable and was zoned for 107 units for a reason. Keep it that way please. 184. Name: Sherry Zhu on 2018-09-20 15:59:17 Comments: 185. Name: Sadie Projonoto on 2018-09-20 16:07:24 Comments: 186. Name: Shannon Levin on 2018-09-20 16:20:57 Comments: 187. Name: christy mangan on 2018-09-20 16:21:56 Comments: 188. Name: Janine Rendano on 2018-09-20 16:41:54 Comments: 189. Name: Ashley prescott on 2018-09-20 16:44:22 Comments: 190. Name: Bev Zook on 2018-09-20 16:46:48 Comments: Way too dense!! 191. Name: Paul Osmers on 2018-09-20 17:06:16 Comments: 192. Name: louis goudy on 2018-09-20 17:09:12 Comments: 193. Name: Lisa Richards on 2018-09-20 17:18:02 Comments: 194. Name: Stacy Nobis on 2018-09-20 17:21:02 Page 17 of 52 Comments: !! 195. Name: JOSEPH GAGLIANO on 2018-09-20 17:25:47 Comments: vote NO - please stop cramming extra units into places just so the developers can make more money - this causes a negative domino effect to so many ! 196. Name: Elizabeth Jane Ruprecht on 2018-09-20 17:28:53 Comments: What about the bears- they already are being hit by cars along Livingston- where do you want them to live if you keep destroying their habitat?? 197. Name: Jason Armstrong on 2018-09-20 17:29:25 Comments: Vote no! 198. Name: Taylor McGinn on 2018-09-20 18:58:12 Comments: 199. Name: Matthew Bailey on 2018-09-20 19:41:47 Comments: NO on Allura 420 Apartments rezoning on Livingston. This will drastically effect the property values of homes in an upscale area and drastically increase traffic and pose additional safety hazards for the elementary and middle schools. There are no other apartment complexes in this location and we bought in this area due to that fact and it being primarily a detached home community. Thank you for your consideration - Matt Bailey 200. Name: Jennifer Suchomel on 2018-09-20 19:53:04 Comments: 201. Name: Randi on 2018-09-20 20:04:45 Comments: This area is too congested to have hundreds of units. It also takes away value from million dollar neighborhoods surrounding it. The schools are over crowded already. 202. Name: Diana Bailey on 2018-09-20 20:34:17 Comments: From Camden Lakes 203. Name: Suzanne Hislin on 2018-09-20 20:41:57 Comments: 204. Name: Kathy Macri on 2018-09-20 20:45:56 Comments: 205. Name: Bryan Billingsley on 2018-09-20 20:49:49 Comments: Page 18 of 52 206. Name: Barbara Green on 2018-09-20 21:09:09 Comments: 207. Name: Katie Burns on 2018-09-20 21:31:30 Comments: 208. Name: Erika Edwards on 2018-09-20 21:33:41 Comments: 209. Name: Donna Edwards on 2018-09-20 21:37:12 Comments: No more building totally object 210. Name: Julia on 2018-09-20 21:45:55 Comments: No 211. Name: Joanne Edwards on 2018-09-20 22:26:26 Comments: 212. Name: Tom Rollins on 2018-09-20 22:28:31 Comments: 213. Name: Tom rosing on 2018-09-20 22:30:45 Comments: This housing development plus SEED TO TABLE will cause major traffic problems for Livingston Street. 214. Name: Julie Trika on 2018-09-20 23:04:38 Comments: 215. Name: William J Edwards on 2018-09-20 23:34:55 Comments: Can not imagine that the extreme density on this 35 acres would work to the best interest of all the single family homeowners who paid good money for their homes in the adjoining areas to this space. Do not allow the rezoning! 216. Name: Billy Edwards on 2018-09-20 23:46:05 Comments: Do not allow this to be re-zoned for apartments of any sort. 217. Name: Andrea DeBenedictis on 2018-09-21 00:14:21 Comments: No re-zone! No way 218. Name: Miriam Weiner on 2018-09-21 00:25:57 Page 19 of 52 Comments: Our water pressure is already too low! How are we going to spread this resource even further when we can’t take a shower now? 219. Name: Trina Mostyn on 2018-09-21 00:37:10 Comments: 220. Name: Arthur Bourque on 2018-09-21 00:37:24 Comments: 221. Name: Mark Gudelski on 2018-09-21 00:44:26 Comments: Please stop this project. 222. Name: Robert Rakich on 2018-09-21 01:25:21 Comments: 223. Name: Nan Currie on 2018-09-21 01:29:21 Comments: 224. Name: Shawn McManus on 2018-09-21 01:33:58 Comments: 225. Name: Jay weiner on 2018-09-21 01:37:53 Comments: Traffic terrible on Livingston already 226. Name: Arlene Rakich on 2018-09-21 01:37:57 Comments: 227. Name: Donald Patrick Currie on 2018-09-21 01:39:24 Comments: Oppose re zoning to apartments. Traffic and congestion horrific 228. Name: Georgia Gile on 2018-09-21 01:43:53 Comments: 229. Name: Marina Roos on 2018-09-21 01:57:25 Comments: 230. Name: Marina Roos on 2018-09-21 01:58:06 Comments: 231. Name: Peter wilson on 2018-09-21 02:17:11 Comments: Page 20 of 52 232. Name: JoEllen Jones on 2018-09-21 02:39:55 Comments: This is absolutely ridiculous!!! What a travesty for this community! 233. Name: Gary Jones on 2018-09-21 02:41:21 Comments: This is a travesty for this community!!!! 234. Name: JoEllen Jones on 2018-09-21 02:43:41 Comments: This is an unwarranted development for this area 235. Name: Karen Wilke on 2018-09-21 02:43:44 Comments: 236. Name: Kathy Thomson on 2018-09-21 02:53:37 Comments: Need to protect the schools and communities in that area - traffic concerns, it will negatively impact the beauty of that area with a dense concentration of apartments. 237. Name: Lillian Guaty on 2018-09-21 02:59:01 Comments: 238. Name: Jill Meeks on 2018-09-21 03:47:04 Comments: 239. Name: Joanne and Anthony Migliaro on 2018-09-21 05:26:06 Comments: 240. Name: Sue Deacon on 2018-09-21 06:20:27 Comments: 241. Name: Nigel Deacon on 2018-09-21 06:21:57 Comments: 242. Name: Paul and Cynthia Goldstein on 2018-09-21 09:58:32 Comments: 243. Name: Irene Franks on 2018-09-21 10:51:48 Comments: Traffic is already backed up on Livingston at times. This will ruin our tranquil community. 244. Name: Joan Cantor on 2018-09-21 11:23:52 Comments: 245. Name: Bobbi Brady on 2018-09-21 11:30:41 Page 21 of 52 Comments: 246. Name: Scott Hansen on 2018-09-21 11:38:48 Comments: 247. Name: Kim Ricchiuti on 2018-09-21 12:09:34 Comments: We do not need a four story complex in our quiet residential community! 248. Name: Christ Doinidis on 2018-09-21 12:22:08 Comments: Housing ok with me! 400 plus apartments. Absolutely not! 249. Name: Dean Ganzhorn on 2018-09-21 12:22:17 Comments: Traffic already backs up to the fire station northbound!! NO WAY!!! 250. Name: Kathy wilson on 2018-09-21 12:24:45 Comments: Please do NOT rezone 251. Name: Judy Kelly on 2018-09-21 12:27:04 Comments: No! Crazy traffic going north and south on Livingston! Don't need apartments either!!! 252. Name: Robert Crowley on 2018-09-21 12:53:28 Comments: Against resigning for apartments 253. Name: John Mulholland on 2018-09-21 13:34:08 Comments: 254. Name: Pam Cooling on 2018-09-21 13:40:35 Comments: NO to Allura!!! 255. Name: Henrik Roos on 2018-09-21 13:56:25 Comments: Please do not rezone. Thanks. 256. Name: Patricia LaRocca on 2018-09-21 14:13:56 Comments: 257. Name: Nancy Barnes on 2018-09-21 14:40:58 Comments: Absolutely shouldn't happen! 258. Name: Jack Barnes on 2018-09-21 14:42:15 Page 22 of 52 Comments: 259. Name: Kathleen Brown on 2018-09-21 14:51:41 Comments: 260. Name: Candice Wroe on 2018-09-21 15:11:28 Comments: 261. Name: Dee on 2018-09-21 17:22:27 Comments: No 262. Name: Carol Hannig on 2018-09-21 18:19:26 Comments: 263. Name: Chris McConnell on 2018-09-21 18:21:23 Comments: 264. Name: Rick Young on 2018-09-21 18:28:02 Comments: 265. Name: A Koch on 2018-09-21 18:54:00 Comments: 266. Name: Robin Anderson on 2018-09-21 18:59:07 Comments: 267. Name: Rafael Guaty on 2018-09-21 18:59:42 Comments: No to re-zoning. Traffic is already a nightmare during the winter season. 268. Name: Gary Anderson on 2018-09-21 19:00:25 Comments: 269. Name: Barbara George on 2018-09-21 19:11:15 Comments: 270. Name: Diana Mills on 2018-09-21 19:39:43 Comments: Keep the existing zoning at 107 units. No justification to change to 420. That's ridiculous. 271. Name: Tara Allison on 2018-09-21 19:53:34 Comments: Page 23 of 52 272. Name: Mary P Salomone on 2018-09-21 19:55:33 Comments: 273. Name: Mario Lucchese on 2018-09-21 20:40:55 Comments: There is no place for High density apartment housing in this area of Collier/Lee County. We don’t need any more traffic on an already congested road during “Season .” It is virtualy impossible to enter or cross Livingston/Imperial Road between 4:30 and 6:00 pm. 274. Name: Donald W Ganzhorn Jr on 2018-09-21 20:57:48 Comments: 275. Name: Karen Lewis on 2018-09-21 21:10:09 Comments: 276. Name: Thomas nessling on 2018-09-21 21:12:03 Comments: 277. Name: Sandy Haas on 2018-09-21 21:19:39 Comments: 278. Name: Melissa Ruddy on 2018-09-21 23:58:18 Comments: This is absurd! How do you put up a 4 story monstrocity in the middle of all these single family homes. Plus the traffic between 4-7 is already a nightmare - bumper to bumper for miles every day. Please dont allow! 279. Name: Samuel Ruddy on 2018-09-21 23:59:28 Comments: Please don’t allow 280. Name: natalie purington on 2018-09-22 01:00:54 Comments: This would be a nightmare traffic wise. 281. Name: David Alpert on 2018-09-22 02:10:58 Comments: Makes no sense 282. Name: Shanai Hill on 2018-09-22 02:25:02 Comments: 283. Name: Tracy Lee on 2018-09-22 02:30:30 Comments: 284. Name: Kathy Messina on 2018-09-22 05:19:52 Comments: No No No There’s too much traffic on Livingston and Immokalee Road as it Page 24 of 52 is - No do not build more apartments, This is a single-family home neighborhood 285. Name: Nancy Muschong on 2018-09-22 10:07:33 Comments: 286. Name: Timothy Harrison on 2018-09-22 15:45:30 Comments: NO REZONING 287. Name: Janice Robilotto on 2018-09-22 16:20:01 Comments: 288. Name: Nancy campbell on 2018-09-22 16:38:15 Comments: 289. Name: Jorida Guda on 2018-09-22 16:49:15 Comments: 290. Name: Kriton Zhezha on 2018-09-22 16:50:51 Comments: 291. Name: Matthew Hall on 2018-09-22 18:29:44 Comments: No high rise apartments! 292. Name: Tony E Lardakis on 2018-09-22 18:49:55 Comments: Vote No on Allura 420 Apts. on Livingston 293. Name: Janice Zimmer on 2018-09-22 19:08:59 Comments: NO to Allura 420 Apartments Rezoning on Livingston 294. Name: Virginia Broome on 2018-09-22 19:56:39 Comments: 295. Name: Marc Sier on 2018-09-22 20:25:30 Comments: No to Stock development of 420 rental units at NE corner of Livingston and Veterans Blvd Naples Fl 296. Name: David Chin on 2018-09-22 20:26:41 Comments: 297. Name: Nilsa Sier on 2018-09-22 20:28:45 Comments: No to Stock development or any rental developments at NE corner of Livingston and Veterans Blvd Naples Fl Page 25 of 52 298. Name: Cheryl Chegwidden on 2018-09-22 20:40:28 Comments: 299. Name: Robert Bolton on 2018-09-22 21:11:44 Comments: 300. Name: Dave Porter on 2018-09-22 21:12:02 Comments: 301. Name: Gail Gavin on 2018-09-22 21:38:59 Comments: I am strongly opposed to converting an approved housing building permit to an apartment permit. I live on Imperial and use Livingston road every day. At times the traffic is very heavy and that will triple if apartments are built 302. Name: Dianne Galup on 2018-09-22 22:29:10 Comments: Please listen to this petition. This land should not be re-zoned. 303. Name: Kara Moran on 2018-09-22 22:33:21 Comments: I do not support changing the zoning. 304. Name: Dominic Salomone on 2018-09-22 23:30:43 Comments: 305. Name: Angela Stollmeyer on 2018-09-23 00:17:38 Comments: Thank you 306. Name: Moira Lardakis on 2018-09-23 01:39:51 Comments: 307. Name: John p stollmeyer on 2018-09-23 03:15:10 Comments: 308. Name: Sonia Barboza on 2018-09-23 13:02:12 Comments: I vote no for this project. 309. Name: Susan Forster on 2018-09-23 13:02:19 Comments: NO to rezoning of property at NE corner of Livingston and Veterans Blvd, Naples FL 310. Name: Sandra Yurgine on 2018-09-23 13:04:47 Comments: Page 26 of 52 311. Name: RUTH GIRLANDO on 2018-09-23 13:34:58 Comments: We need to pay more attention to the ecology and less to the needs of developers. Naples is already straining to preserve drinking water and deal with our storm water. Consider the impact that a dense population had on flooding with Harvey in Texas last year. 312. Name: Ellen Baseman on 2018-09-23 13:40:13 Comments: 313. Name: Richard A Stiso on 2018-09-23 13:41:26 Comments: 314. Name: Beth on 2018-09-23 13:49:11 Comments: 315. Name: Janet Roberts on 2018-09-23 13:54:16 Comments: Just say NO(!!!) to Allura Apartments Rezoning on Livingston Rd!! 316. Name: Albert Roberts on 2018-09-23 13:56:15 Comments: So NO to Allura 420 apartments rezoning on Livingston Rd 317. Name: Lori Green on 2018-09-23 13:57:39 Comments: 318. Name: Susan Stiefel on 2018-09-23 14:14:58 Comments: 319. Name: James Holloway on 2018-09-23 14:24:18 Comments: No to the 420 Apartments 320. Name: Gary Moorhead on 2018-09-23 14:27:12 Comments: I vote no. 321. Name: Flo Natuzzi on 2018-09-23 14:27:37 Comments: Enough already with the building up of beautiful Naples. This is not Manhattan! I oppose this project. 322. Name: Patricia Natale on 2018-09-23 14:33:21 Comments: No Allure apartments!!! Page 27 of 52 323. Name: Susan locke on 2018-09-23 14:52:37 Comments: We don't have the roads to handle all of this development of multi family living! 324. Name: John locke on 2018-09-23 14:55:33 Comments: 325. Name: Helen Bowkett on 2018-09-23 15:10:07 Comments: We oppose Re-Zoning this land for 420 apartments. 326. Name: Geoff Bowkett on 2018-09-23 15:12:12 Comments: I OPPOSE REZONING OF THIS LAND FORf A FOUR STORY, 420 UNIT 327. Name: Lauren Fisco on 2018-09-23 15:12:55 Comments: Opposed to building the proposed 420 appartment complex. 328. Name: Robert Coomes on 2018-09-23 15:32:25 Comments: 329. Name: Lucinda Von Romer on 2018-09-23 15:42:35 Comments: 330. Name: Janet Howard on 2018-09-23 15:47:02 Comments: 331. Name: ron coccari on 2018-09-23 15:48:03 Comments: Please no apartments on Livingston, SO NO TO AUURA 332. Name: Karen Booth on 2018-09-23 15:52:20 Comments: 333. Name: John Booth on 2018-09-23 15:53:51 Comments: 334. Name: Cindy Kelly on 2018-09-23 16:00:30 Comments: 335. Name: Mary Ulery on 2018-09-23 16:19:00 Comments: 336. Name: Lynn Desmond on 2018-09-23 17:01:35 Page 28 of 52 Comments: Property shoild not be rezoned for that size complex. 337. Name: Jane wayne on 2018-09-23 17:10:25 Comments: This is a very bad location for this project 338. Name: Vincent Bonavita on 2018-09-23 17:18:09 Comments: 339. Name: Barbara Paglia on 2018-09-23 17:18:49 Comments: 340. Name: Pam Scott on 2018-09-23 17:28:35 Comments: Noooooo! 341. Name: Ken on 2018-09-23 17:29:37 Comments: 342. Name: Cindy Settina on 2018-09-23 17:54:09 Comments: 343. Name: Melisa Alvaranga on 2018-09-23 17:55:33 Comments: 344. Name: Kathleen Panagides on 2018-09-23 18:00:05 Comments: 345. Name: Carolyn Pagano on 2018-09-23 18:02:18 Comments: We are congested enough and don't need any multi family units on Livingston Road . 346. Name: Alberto Negro on 2018-09-23 18:08:19 Comments: 347. Name: Pamela Hill on 2018-09-23 18:27:57 Comments: 348. Name: Stephen Hill on 2018-09-23 18:35:21 Comments: The traffic on Livingstone Rd has already increased significantly over the past 10 years. It is a nightmare at times, especially during rush hour. The addition of 420 units will only add to the problem. I do not believe that rezoning should be allowed for the property. Page 29 of 52 349. Name: Ronald Leavitt on 2018-09-23 19:07:30 Comments: This is the wrong place for an area that has always been populated by homeowners. 350. Name: Janelle Osborne on 2018-09-23 19:30:51 Comments: 351. Name: Ann Sandmann on 2018-09-23 19:42:16 Comments: No rezoning 352. Name: Mike Sandmann on 2018-09-23 19:43:46 Comments: No rezoning 353. Name: sharon k Fish on 2018-09-23 19:47:04 Comments: 354. Name: malvolm on 2018-09-23 19:51:18 Comments: 355. Name: Kathy Radick on 2018-09-23 20:05:42 Comments: 356. Name: Ron Radick on 2018-09-23 20:07:46 Comments: 357. Name: Amanda Radick on 2018-09-23 20:13:58 Comments: 358. Name: Nancy Murphy on 2018-09-23 20:18:54 Comments: 359. Name: Sandy Schultz on 2018-09-23 20:36:52 Comments: Livingston gets totally backed up now as is during Season. We do not need another 400 -800 cars on Livingston Rd.! 360. Name: Karen Muckerheide on 2018-09-23 20:56:12 Comments: 361. Name: Judy Rosing on 2018-09-23 23:20:14 Comments: 362. Name: Jay Cunningham on 2018-09-23 23:23:33 Page 30 of 52 Comments: This project does not add anything to enhance Livingston Road witch is congested now. Rezoning to appease a developer is ill-advised. 363. Name: Roy Rice on 2018-09-23 23:49:52 Comments: 364. Name: Dan Macksood on 2018-09-24 00:00:31 Comments: 365. Name: Nick Radick on 2018-09-24 00:02:02 Comments: 366. Name: Barbara Goldberg on 2018-09-24 00:51:49 Comments: 367. Name: Diane Lombardo on 2018-09-24 01:13:39 Comments: 368. Name: Joseph Lombardo on 2018-09-24 01:14:54 Comments: 369. Name: Michael Broome on 2018-09-24 01:24:29 Comments: There was a reason that this property was zoned to prevent this type of development. Please abide by that good sense! 370. Name: Carolyn Oswald on 2018-09-24 01:57:44 Comments: 371. Name: Danielle Nicoletta on 2018-09-24 02:33:04 Comments: 372. Name: Peter Nocoletta on 2018-09-24 02:34:11 Comments: 373. Name: Ted Fluehr on 2018-09-24 04:29:47 Comments: This will further congest and already overcrowded roadway and will be a traffic nightmare. 374. Name: Sheila Millour on 2018-09-24 04:30:51 Comments: 375. Name: Despina Page on 2018-09-24 04:50:35 Page 31 of 52 Comments: No to 420 apartments 376. Name: Susannah McDonough on 2018-09-24 10:50:54 Comments: This building must stop! 377. Name: Tanya Sandahl on 2018-09-24 10:51:39 Comments: 378. Name: Anne Smart on 2018-09-24 10:54:26 Comments: No no no this cannot be! 379. Name: Susann Crannell on 2018-09-24 11:38:04 Comments: 380. Name: Jay Crannell on 2018-09-24 11:40:51 Comments: 381. Name: Ronald Stepien on 2018-09-24 12:00:28 Comments: Apartments would cause too much congestion on an already congested street. 382. Name: Sally Kane on 2018-09-24 12:51:51 Comments: 383. Name: Lisa Kulsen on 2018-09-24 13:04:52 Comments: 384. Name: David Payne on 2018-09-24 14:21:53 Comments: No on rezoning 385. Name: Mike Congrove on 2018-09-24 14:23:03 Comments: 386. Name: Steve Matteau on 2018-09-24 14:40:29 Comments: 387. Name: Dianne Ambrose on 2018-09-24 15:59:28 Comments: No to apartments! 388. Name: Barbara Hurt-Simmons on 2018-09-24 16:41:28 Comments: Please do not add to the density of this area. I live in Talis Park and have seen a need (based on sales) for homes vs. apartments in this part of the county. Page 32 of 52 389. Name: Timothy A Fusco on 2018-09-24 16:56:28 Comments: 390. Name: Gus Petisco on 2018-09-24 20:12:45 Comments: I am opposed to the rezoning. The original 20 acres were zoned for 107 homes so 35 acres should allow for around 200 homes max. Anything above 3 stories is a high rise. It would greatly impact school, property values, traffic and water. NO to 420 rental units 391. Name: John Macksood on 2018-09-24 20:47:12 Comments: 392. Name: Bradley pricd on 2018-09-24 22:10:35 Comments: KEEP NAPLES GREEN 393. Name: Charles on 2018-09-25 00:25:51 Comments: 420 Apartments rezoning will make this area congested and overcrowded. Keep Naples a nice town for the existing residents! 394. Name: Esther DePasquale on 2018-09-25 05:42:07 Comments: NO to Allora 420 Apartments on Livingston Rd.! 395. Name: Sylvie Hain-Mangel on 2018-09-25 07:52:52 Comments: 396. Name: Pamela Yeomans barth on 2018-09-25 11:44:21 Comments: 397. Name: Deb Fahy on 2018-09-25 12:01:28 Comments: 398. Name: Peter C Marshall on 2018-09-25 12:27:11 Comments: 399. Name: Bruce Barth on 2018-09-25 13:06:20 Comments: 400. Name: MaryAnn Domulewicz on 2018-09-25 15:12:41 Comments: No to 420 rental units. 401. Name: Michael V DOMULEWICZ on 2018-09-25 15:22:31 Page 33 of 52 Comments: 402. Name: Lois Boaz on 2018-09-25 15:49:26 Comments: 403. Name: Jacqui Maginity Schulz on 2018-09-25 17:04:37 Comments: Too tall too contested too many units traffic already is a nightmare 404. Name: stanley Fish on 2018-09-25 17:27:17 Comments: 405. Name: Alyce Chatham on 2018-09-25 18:16:49 Comments: 406. Name: Lynn Hall on 2018-09-25 19:17:47 Comments: 407. Name: kathleen phelan on 2018-09-25 21:32:45 Comments: 408. Name: Anthony Phelan on 2018-09-25 21:38:01 Comments: 409. Name: Margaret on 2018-09-26 00:13:46 Comments: 410. Name: THOMAS THOMSON on 2018-09-26 14:25:37 Comments: 411. Name: Walter Neubauer on 2018-09-26 18:09:05 Comments: Another addition of that size will significantly widen The already existing traffic problems 412. Name: Tara and Jeff Alluri on 2018-09-26 19:22:41 Comments: We are against the Allura project! 413. Name: Linda Albenga on 2018-09-26 20:41:21 Comments: I am against the apartment complex going in next door to me. 414. Name: Paul Deleo on 2018-09-26 21:33:13 Comments: Page 34 of 52 415. Name: Gina Almeida Holloway on 2018-09-26 21:38:36 Comments: 416. Name: Nancy Hammond on 2018-09-26 21:38:43 Comments: No to rezoning on SE corner of Livingston and Veterans Memorial Parkway. 417. Name: Susan Park on 2018-09-27 00:58:42 Comments: 418. Name: Harry Dell on 2018-09-27 01:12:10 Comments: Please don't build! 419. Name: Christian Tobin on 2018-09-27 01:25:55 Comments: Please do not re-zone. 420. Name: Candice tousignant on 2018-09-27 01:48:41 Comments: 421. Name: Yong Jin Park on 2018-09-27 02:23:38 Comments: Against the Allura Project. 422. Name: Melissa Hemmert on 2018-09-27 02:32:31 Comments: 423. Name: SHANNON greco on 2018-09-27 10:57:01 Comments: 424. Name: Tyler Black on 2018-09-27 11:01:07 Comments: 425. Name: Michelle Davis on 2018-09-27 11:02:29 Comments: 426. Name: Erin kirwin on 2018-09-27 11:31:12 Comments: 427. Name: Bilynda Cox on 2018-09-27 11:36:00 Comments: 428. Name: Tessa Mortensen on 2018-09-27 12:39:40 Comments: Page 35 of 52 429. Name: Soonhee Park on 2018-09-27 13:12:31 Comments: No to Allure420 Apartments Rezoning on Rivingstone 430. Name: Barry Scheetz on 2018-09-27 13:17:08 Comments: No to rezoning on SE corner of Livingston and Veterans Memorial Parkway to build the proposed apartment complex. 431. Name: Kim duvalle on 2018-09-27 14:36:24 Comments: 432. Name: Stacey Puchalla on 2018-09-27 17:12:03 Comments: 433. Name: Michael Puchalla on 2018-09-27 17:12:51 Comments: 434. Name: Lisa Nungester on 2018-09-27 22:10:04 Comments: 435. Name: Dan Fiascherti on 2018-09-28 00:31:05 Comments: 436. Name: Brandon Yoder on 2018-09-28 02:09:48 Comments: 437. Name: Barbara Safer on 2018-09-28 14:51:38 Comments: Traffic is already terrible! Stop building! 438. Name: Eileen Wilson on 2018-09-28 16:13:16 Comments: 439. Name: Elaine Randazzo on 2018-09-28 16:13:29 Comments: I do not want a 420 unit apartment complex in this already congested area. 440. Name: Debbie Michaels on 2018-09-28 16:33:59 Comments: I would support a condo community or single family home community on that property; but, not apartments requiring a zoning change. An apartment population will overburden the local school system and traffic pattern in the area. 441. Name: Cathy Green on 2018-09-29 01:45:33 Comments: Don't build!! The roads and rivers cannot handle more! Page 36 of 52 442. Name: Linda Cohen on 2018-09-29 15:36:17 Comments: 443. Name: Walter Cook on 2018-10-01 19:55:04 Comments: NO to Allura 420 Apartments Rezoning on Livingston 444. Name: Tom Birmingham on 2018-10-01 23:20:28 Comments: 445. Name: Patricia Rodriguez on 2018-10-02 01:09:11 Comments: No change 446. Name: T Koch on 2018-10-02 01:20:01 Comments: 447. Name: Scott Toth on 2018-10-02 12:51:01 Comments: This will create additional traffic and decrease our property values. 448. Name: Laurent Millour on 2018-10-02 13:47:16 Comments: 449. Name: Elizabeth Thompson on 2018-10-02 15:20:47 Comments: No to Allure complex. 450. Name: Elaine Perna on 2018-10-02 18:47:51 Comments: 451. Name: Thomas Perna on 2018-10-02 18:49:40 Comments: 452. Name: Vivian Banta on 2018-10-02 19:18:50 Comments: 453. Name: Robert Field on 2018-10-02 19:19:52 Comments: 454. Name: Valerie Clerico on 2018-10-02 19:24:00 Comments: 455. Name: Lucien Clerico on 2018-10-02 19:30:14 Comments: Page 37 of 52 456. Name: Jo Ann Jamieson on 2018-10-02 20:19:11 Comments: 457. Name: Mark Jamieson on 2018-10-02 20:20:55 Comments: 458. Name: Christi Pedra on 2018-10-02 20:54:32 Comments: 459. Name: Barbara Blanchard on 2018-10-02 21:10:28 Comments: 460. Name: Susan Montgomery on 2018-10-02 21:18:35 Comments: 461. Name: Audrey schmitt on 2018-10-02 21:20:09 Comments: 462. Name: Anne Hildebrand on 2018-10-02 21:23:42 Comments: 463. Name: Susan Yellin on 2018-10-02 22:14:52 Comments: 464. Name: ronnie antik on 2018-10-02 22:17:52 Comments: 465. Name: Michael S Brown on 2018-10-02 22:28:10 Comments: 466. Name: Lawrence Kahn on 2018-10-02 22:33:53 Comments: 467. Name: Diana Kahn on 2018-10-02 22:35:45 Comments: 468. Name: John J Gray on 2018-10-02 22:52:29 Comments: 469. Name: J Elizabeth Miller on 2018-10-02 23:27:46 Comments: Page 38 of 52 470. Name: Mary Yeomans on 2018-10-02 23:28:33 Comments: 471. Name: Colleen Patrick on 2018-10-02 23:45:48 Comments: 472. Name: Lawrence Patrick on 2018-10-02 23:47:58 Comments: 473. Name: Susan Lass on 2018-10-02 23:50:43 Comments: No to rezoning the property on Livingston Rd. and Veteran's Parkway. No to 420 unit apartment complex. Traffic congestions already exists only to be further increased by the food store "Seed to Table". 474. Name: Susan Silversmith on 2018-10-03 00:58:15 Comments: I am opposed to the rezoning of the property at the corner of Livingston and Veterans Parkway. 475. Name: Bridget Abadie on 2018-10-03 02:02:40 Comments: Wrong project for this location. 476. Name: Charles Abadie on 2018-10-03 02:04:32 Comments: This project is not in character with the surrounding communities, will damage property values of single family home communities resulting in a lower tax base for Collier County and a project of this scale should not be approved 477. Name: Elizabeth Jaffe on 2018-10-03 02:09:13 Comments: 478. Name: Sandy DiPasquale on 2018-10-03 02:27:46 Comments: 479. Name: Connie DiPasquale on 2018-10-03 02:28:45 Comments: 480. Name: Larry Leventon on 2018-10-03 03:12:03 Comments: Absolutely opposed too much traffic now too much density for both the property and the area 481. Name: Geri on 2018-10-03 03:31:28 Comments: No Page 39 of 52 482. Name: Ann Oswald on 2018-10-03 05:07:32 Comments: Oppose the allure 420 apartment rezoning 483. Name: Paul Yellin MD on 2018-10-03 07:04:27 Comments: 484. Name: Carl miller on 2018-10-03 11:23:57 Comments: 485. Name: Alison Favale on 2018-10-03 11:32:54 Comments: 486. Name: Paul Favale on 2018-10-03 11:33:30 Comments: 487. Name: Ronald nordlof on 2018-10-03 11:36:44 Comments: 488. Name: Michael Madden on 2018-10-03 11:54:17 Comments: 489. Name: Jane Kammerait on 2018-10-03 12:24:02 Comments: The traffic on Livingston is awful already. Can’t imagine if there were more people funneled through the area. 490. Name: Edward Kolesar on 2018-10-03 13:01:06 Comments: 491. Name: Joe Blanchard on 2018-10-03 14:30:33 Comments: 492. Name: Mary Fahrer on 2018-10-03 14:43:33 Comments: Reject rezoning 493. Name: John Pino on 2018-10-03 15:06:37 Comments: I am opposed to rezoning the property on the Southeast corner of Livingston Road and Veterans Memorial Parkway 494. Name: Barb Everist on 2018-10-03 15:57:18 Comments: 495. Name: Katy Wrede on 2018-10-03 16:46:25 Page 40 of 52 Comments: If this rezoning is allowed, there will be undue traffic jams as a result of three schools, a fire station and two more new communities already being built between Vanderbilt and Bonita Beach Road. This would have an environmental impact in that it reduced the floodwater basin areas. Vereran's Blvd. is only 3/4 of a mile long from Livingston to the east dead end and already 3 neighborhoods use that small stretch along with construction traffic with no controls. It is almost impossible to move on Livingston north or south and on Immokolee or Bonita Beach Road east or west from 3:30-6:00 during season. The three schools are already at capacity and there is simply no where for new residents to go. All neighborhoods dependent upon these roads will be locked in their homes and unable to escape. 496. Name: Patti Manoogian on 2018-10-03 16:52:48 Comments: 497. Name: Ann Turner on 2018-10-03 18:16:36 Comments: 498. Name: Grace Frey on 2018-10-03 18:26:54 Comments: 499. Name: Janet pino on 2018-10-03 18:34:08 Comments: Do not rezone the property between at the corner of Livingston Road and Veterans Memorial Parkway. 500. Name: Nicholas M Bilotti on 2018-10-03 19:28:04 Comments: 501. Name: Kay Larose on 2018-10-03 20:28:40 Comments: 502. Name: Mary Sena on 2018-10-03 20:42:09 Comments: 503. Name: Mary Kozitka on 2018-10-03 21:18:54 Comments: 504. Name: Richard Kozitka on 2018-10-03 21:20:17 Comments: 505. Name: Tom Bulloch on 2018-10-03 21:42:58 Comments: Density inconsistent with current build out. 506. Name: Lynne McGrail on 2018-10-03 23:30:48 Comments: Page 41 of 52 507. Name: Mary Cronin on 2018-10-04 00:44:02 Comments: 508. Name: JudyBraaten on 2018-10-04 01:03:24 Comments: 509. Name: Claire Jelic on 2018-10-04 01:48:50 Comments: 510. Name: Pauline Ferrone on 2018-10-04 02:16:10 Comments: The traffic and density in this region is out of control. It puts stress on our water supply and resources. Swfl is overdeveloped!!! This is rapping the land for builders. Profit Far too many units for this site! 511. Name: Karyl leggio on 2018-10-04 12:00:12 Comments: 512. Name: Herbert Henkel on 2018-10-04 12:44:45 Comments: NO to Allura 420 Apartments 513. Name: Robert Sena on 2018-10-04 13:09:19 Comments: 514. Name: Patti Lopes on 2018-10-04 13:11:49 Comments: 515. Name: Barb Juedes on 2018-10-04 13:15:30 Comments: 516. Name: Sherry Marcom on 2018-10-04 13:33:04 Comments: 517. Name: Harry Rose on 2018-10-04 13:35:54 Comments: 518. Name: Arthur Juedes on 2018-10-04 13:48:42 Comments: 519. Name: Tiffany Shalberg on 2018-10-04 20:14:05 Comments: Page 42 of 52 520. Name: Sue Koehler on 2018-10-04 21:32:03 Comments: This should never happen, the area cannot handle the congestion it will cause! 521. Name: Susan Gering on 2018-10-05 15:57:30 Comments: 522. Name: Rick Gering on 2018-10-05 16:04:12 Comments: 523. Name: Alan Johnson on 2018-10-05 21:31:34 Comments: 524. Name: Cynthia Johnson on 2018-10-05 21:33:07 Comments: 525. Name: Richard Johnson on 2018-10-06 11:59:14 Comments: This area can not handle the increased density a project like this will bring. 526. Name: Mary Johnson on 2018-10-06 14:27:26 Comments: 527. Name: MEL STEIN on 2018-10-07 15:34:55 Comments: The resulting congestion plus additional stress on electricity and water resources in the area is totally unacceptable. 528. Name: Jane Stein on 2018-10-07 15:44:29 Comments: Absolutely NO! NO! NO! 529. Name: david ambrose on 2018-10-07 17:27:42 Comments: 530. Name: Lauren Wygant on 2018-10-07 18:54:09 Comments: 531. Name: Keeley Lewis on 2018-10-07 18:58:04 Comments: 532. Name: Deanna Wallin on 2018-10-07 19:22:08 Comments: 533. Name: Brandi Morgan on 2018-10-07 19:23:11 Page 43 of 52 Comments: 534. Name: David pardue on 2018-10-07 19:49:54 Comments: 535. Name: Jenn on 2018-10-07 20:43:15 Comments: 536. Name: Melanie Johns on 2018-10-07 21:24:40 Comments: 537. Name: John Nardozzi on 2018-10-07 21:58:06 Comments: 538. Name: Sara Gilles on 2018-10-07 22:35:56 Comments: 539. Name: Lisa Jarrett on 2018-10-07 22:45:34 Comments: No ! 540. Name: Lisa loiacono on 2018-10-07 23:11:44 Comments: Absolutely a terrible idea 541. Name: Dianna Albrechtsen on 2018-10-07 23:32:32 Comments: 542. Name: Nancy Martinez on 2018-10-08 00:59:17 Comments: 543. Name: Bill Freda on 2018-10-08 11:35:15 Comments: 544. Name: Jim Simmons on 2018-10-08 13:02:04 Comments: Traffic on Veterans Memorial (a dead end street) would be a nightmare. We moved in to an area specifically for single family homes! 545. Name: Juan Jaje on 2018-10-08 14:08:20 Comments: 546. Name: Anne Policinski on 2018-10-08 15:10:23 Comments: Page 44 of 52 547. Name: Linda Gallo on 2018-10-08 16:33:32 Comments: 548. Name: Ray Gallo on 2018-10-08 16:36:31 Comments: 549. Name: Ruth Bethem on 2018-10-08 16:38:11 Comments: 550. Name: Mel Simmons-Rosen on 2018-10-08 16:43:30 Comments: 551. Name: ALAN GREENBERG on 2018-10-08 16:46:10 Comments: 552. Name: CRYSTAL EVANS on 2018-10-08 16:49:44 Comments: 553. Name: Ian cocklin on 2018-10-08 16:54:38 Comments: 554. Name: Stephanie Baker-Thomas on 2018-10-08 16:57:28 Comments: 555. Name: Pamela F Wood on 2018-10-08 17:08:16 Comments: 556. Name: Donald polen on 2018-10-08 17:08:24 Comments: 557. Name: William Collier on 2018-10-08 17:10:39 Comments: 558. Name: David L Wood on 2018-10-08 17:10:41 Comments: 559. Name: Rick Bethem on 2018-10-08 17:11:49 Comments: 560. Name: A Mercurio on 2018-10-08 17:29:05 Comments: Page 45 of 52 561. Name: Joel Gravina on 2018-10-08 17:50:29 Comments: 562. Name: Marthe Lawrence on 2018-10-08 17:55:01 Comments: 563. Name: Lorraine Dube on 2018-10-08 18:48:19 Comments: Density is too high. Traffic will increase significantly. This is a low density area and should remain so. 564. Name: Diane Shields on 2018-10-08 19:16:14 Comments: 565. Name: Shirley popham on 2018-10-08 19:49:35 Comments: Too many apartments. We need to slow down growth in Naples 566. Name: Kristine Rapp on 2018-10-08 20:41:12 Comments: 567. Name: Kathy Messina on 2018-10-08 21:06:36 Comments: I vote no do not change the zoning no more apartments and condos on Livingston too much traffic already no no 568. Name: Janice MacLean on 2018-10-08 21:36:51 Comments: 569. Name: robert crema on 2018-10-08 22:15:47 Comments: 570. Name: Eileen Foley on 2018-10-08 23:13:07 Comments: 571. Name: Corinne Palmer on 2018-10-08 23:15:27 Comments: We need affordable housing, not another upscale apartment complex. Teacher, firefighters, wait staff, nurses, etc cannot afford to live here. 572. Name: James Coogan on 2018-10-09 15:20:14 Comments: The area cannot sustain the additional traffic. This high-density project is out of character with the surrounding area. 573. Name: Elaine Lake on 2018-10-09 16:18:06 Comments: The auto & people congestion in the area is going to force everyone living just outside the immediate area to avoid buying homes here and shopping in the area, Page 46 of 52 including shopping at the soon to open Seed to Table, gormet grocery store. Collier Government has allowed the overgrowth of humans and autos in the area and now our quality of life is in question. A quieter and less stress-like life is what drew us to Naples. If this additional housing goes through we will put our place up for sale as soon as my husband retires, in the not so far away future. Now, can’t even get close to our limited beach space in season. This year government took beach front land away from all that do not own beach property. Even during low tide, private citizens own the ocean floor?! Why stay in FL? Don’t move to SW FL, unless you know the politics and growth plans of the area. There is a real safety risk to bicycle, bike, pedestrian and auto safety. Communities will be forced to post signs at their exit gates that read, “EXIT AT YOUR OWN RISK!”. 574. Name: Lill Weitz on 2018-10-09 17:08:32 Comments: 575. Name: Bruce Weitz on 2018-10-09 17:36:44 Comments: I vote no to this development 576. Name: Gary Hermann on 2018-10-09 20:46:47 Comments: 577. Name: Miloslav Kopecny on 2018-10-10 20:36:12 Comments: No 578. Name: Tania sciancalepore on 2018-10-10 22:33:49 Comments: 579. Name: Sofia Sciancalepore on 2018-10-10 22:34:59 Comments: 580. Name: Marina Sciancalepore on 2018-10-10 22:35:27 Comments: 581. Name: Irene benfatti on 2018-10-10 22:39:13 Comments: 582. Name: Vincent benfatti on 2018-10-10 22:39:32 Comments: 583. Name: Lori Murphy on 2018-10-11 17:01:57 Comments: I vote no to this petition 584. Name: Robyn Wilson on 2018-10-11 21:25:15 Comments: I vote no. Page 47 of 52 585. Name: R Lynn Wilson on 2018-10-11 21:27:20 Comments: No 586. Name: joyce zub on 2018-10-12 04:06:23 Comments: 587. Name: Kristen Claunch on 2018-10-12 13:26:14 Comments: 588. Name: James and Roe Welding on 2018-10-15 11:49:59 Comments: We have lived in The Strand for 19 years and have seen the growth in Northern Collier County as a good thing as long as the developers consider "density" and Traffic issues in a responsible way. We use Veterans Parkway every day and share the traffic load with our good neighbors, Talis Park,Mediterra and the brand new Barrington Cove. The intersection at Veterans and Livingston is already at a snails pace during rush hours and school drop off and pick up. The addition of 420 apartments would add approximately 500+ vehicles to this intersection. This is not only unacceptable to the people wholve here but a Safety issue for the residents. Tell Stock to go back to the private home idea. 589. Name: Kevin Campanella on 2018-10-15 20:19:37 Comments: We don’t need more places to live here. Naples is becoming incredibly overcrowded in season and even out of season has been much worse then even a few years ago. 590. Name: Dmitry Keselman on 2018-10-15 20:49:34 Comments: 591. Name: Diane Conner on 2018-10-16 11:30:46 Comments: 592. Name: Gerald Bandelean on 2018-10-16 12:37:29 Comments: 593. Name: Francis J Brennan Jr on 2018-10-16 16:41:47 Comments: 594. Name: Therese B Brennan on 2018-10-16 16:43:07 Comments: 595. Name: Sherri Dorrill on 2018-10-16 16:48:36 Comments: It was zoned correctly the first time. Please do not compromise quality for quantity- I live at the Strand and use the back gate because Immokalee Road is so Page 48 of 52 backed up and crowded- please do not add congestion on this road too- the road to 2 lane and it causes more traffic concerns and signal Timing and slower traffic on Livingston which is already a problem when school is in session 596. Name: Robert w hayes on 2018-10-16 18:40:03 Comments: I am a resident/owner in the Strand. And I am totally against the rezoning of this parcel of land on livingstonand veterans memorial. I am opposed to the construction of this apartment complex bordering our communities. 597. Name: Ernest Sauers on 2018-10-16 19:15:46 Comments: 598. Name: Douglas Cedras on 2018-10-16 19:26:07 Comments: The zoning should remain for 107 private homes. 599. Name: Tina Cedras on 2018-10-16 19:26:56 Comments: The zoning should remain for 107 private homes. 600. Name: Philip Gallucci on 2018-10-16 19:29:50 Comments: Severe congestion will surely result from this proposed development. 601. Name: Stephen Edmondson on 2018-10-16 20:05:44 Comments: 602. Name: Alex Markley on 2018-10-16 20:41:27 Comments: We don’t need that many more cars at that intersection. Give us a break 603. Name: Mary Loftus on 2018-10-17 12:46:33 Comments: 604. Name: Stephen Dorazio on 2018-10-17 13:11:30 Comments: 605. Name: melinda pancamo on 2018-10-17 14:28:05 Comments: the strand waited years before getting a back gate for our safety. We have 3 communities exiting onto Veterans Pkwy. When will this county said enough is enough. Please don't make Naples another Fort Lauderdale and lose its beauty. 606. Name: Elaine Reda on 2018-10-17 15:54:44 Comments: Strand residents are being backed into a corner. That has potential danger. Page 49 of 52 607. Name: M Diane Sauers on 2018-10-17 23:33:50 Comments: 608. Name: Harriet Spirer on 2018-10-18 01:45:44 Comments: 609. Name: Lisa Hoover on 2018-10-18 02:19:18 Comments: Stop the madness and stop the traffic Just insane 610. Name: Kathleen Brooks on 2018-10-18 13:50:02 Comments: No 611. Name: Richard Galash on 2018-10-18 17:40:36 Comments: I strongly agree with Sherrie Dorill's comments in the matter and do not agree with any rezoning applications. I am against it. 612. Name: Barbara hemrick on 2018-10-19 23:50:43 Comments: 613. Name: Pat LaBattaglia on 2018-10-20 15:49:13 Comments: No to rezoning. 107 private homes should remain and not be increased to 4 times more residences. 614. Name: C L Ehn on 2018-10-22 17:56:03 Comments: The density in this area has increased dramatically. The planned 107 units will increase it further. The requested rezoning would increase traffic very significantly, to the detriment of all of us who use Veterans Parkway. The requested rezoning should be denied! 615. Name: Jim Lisa Hoover on 2018-10-23 18:22:03 Comments: No 616. Name: karen wicker on 2018-10-23 20:23:00 Comments: i am very apposed to having a large apartment complex ajoining .The Strand. It will cause more traffic problems and negatively affect our property values. 617. Name: Helen M Lallo on 2018-10-24 13:24:57 Comments: 618. Name: Ernest A Lallo on 2018-10-24 13:25:46 Comments: Page 50 of 52 619. Name: Gary jones on 2018-10-24 18:01:16 Comments: 620. Name: John Pangonis on 2018-10-24 18:21:45 Comments: Please stop this unreasonable proposition. 621. Name: Nancee dykstra on 2018-10-25 12:33:11 Comments: 622. Name: Trey Gardo on 2018-10-26 12:10:19 Comments: This will create more traffic to an area that already has too much traffic and the schools can not handle that many additional students 623. Name: Joe DeMarco on 2018-10-26 12:19:02 Comments: 624. Name: Andreas Singer on 2018-10-26 12:53:34 Comments: this should not be allowed to be rezoned. Even in the summer-time , without the seasonal residents, the area is already congested on a daily basis. NO! 625. Name: Maria Pastrana on 2018-10-26 12:59:55 Comments: 626. Name: Julian TUcker on 2018-10-26 14:00:08 Comments: 627. Name: Brian Kramer on 2018-10-26 15:32:08 Comments: 628. Name: David Gauthier on 2018-10-26 17:28:02 Comments: 629. Name: Sally Russo on 2018-10-26 18:28:07 Comments: No to rezoning. 630. Name: Dan Clarke on 2018-10-26 20:13:38 Comments: PLEASE do not allow a zoning change on the 35 acres at the southeast corner of Livingston Rd and Veterans Parkway. The density is already too much !! 631. Name: Arthur Bradshaw on 2018-10-27 14:58:01 Comments: Keep the area low density. Owner occupied is best for everyone. Page 51 of 52 632. Name: Kevin Hodder on 2018-10-29 16:19:12 Comments: Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org) Page 52 of 52 From: StrainMark Sent: Monday, November 26, 2018 6:38 AM To: SchmidtCorby Cc: SaboJames Subject: FW: Objection to Allura Re-Zoning Attachments: The Strand Master Property Owners Ass Allura letter.docx Please distribute as typical. Mark 239.252.4446 Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From: Susan Mulgrew <1982swm@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, November 26, 2018 12:27 AM To: MarkStrain@colliergov.net; SchmidtCorby <Corby.Schmidt@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Objection to Allura Re-Zoning Gentlemen: Attached please find a letter from The Strand Master Property Owners Association outlining our objections to the upcoming re-zoning request from Stock Development regarding the development of the Allura Apartments. As a community of 1073 residences nearby, WE STRONGLY OBJECT to this project for the reasons in the attached letter. Thank you so much for your consideration. Susan Mulgrew, President The Strand Master Property Owners Association From: StrainMark Sent: Monday, November 26, 2018 3:06 PM To: SchmidtCorby Cc: SaboJames Subject: FW: Opposition to - PETITION #PL-20170004419/CP-2018-1 Please distribute as typical. Mark 239.252.4446 Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From: Thomas Griffith <thomasm.griffith@icloud.com> Sent: Monday, November 26, 2018 3:03 PM To: StrainMark <Mark.Strain@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Opposition to - PETITION #PL-20170004419/CP-2018-1 Dear Mr. Strain – I’m writing in regards to my opposition to the Allura project, petition #PL-20170004419/CP-2018-1 to the rezoning so 420 rental apartments can be built on this property. My self and the majority of the people I know are not opposed to single family homes being built in this area. We are opposed to the property being rezoned so 420 rental apartments can be built. The rental apartments will house a minimum of 735 tenants and does not fit into the landscape of this area. Traffic - Immokalee Rd. to Bonita Beach Rd. has no East/West exits for 4.2 miles. Regularly and every week day during season traffic is backed up on Livingston every afternoon for hours from Bonita Beach Rd. south to Veterans Memorial Blvd. and further. To get my son to baseball practice in Bonita I have to go south to Immokalee to 41 then north to Bonita. These 420 rental apartments will certainly add to this congestion. Home Values - Most studies show at least a 12.7% decline in property values near multifamily rental apartments. There is a perceived stigma with apartments having higher crime and less desirable tenants. Whether this is true or not doesn’t matter as it’s the perceived stigma that keep people from buying homes next to rental apartments. Schools – What will the impacts be on the schools? Veterans Memorial Elementary is already at capacity and North Naples Middle School is at 86% capacity. I hope you can support the thousands of residents that oppose a project that is not consistent with the current land uses in the area and will have a negative impact to our investments and quality of life. Thanks. Tom From: StrainMark Sent: Monday, November 26, 2018 6:34 AM To: SchmidtCorby Cc: SaboJames Subject: FW: Proposal for Stock Development at Livingston and Veterans Memorial Roads Please distribute as typical. Mark 239.252.4446 Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From: Tim Diegel <timdiegel@mac.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2018 10:05 PM To: StrainMark <Mark.Strain@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Proposal for Stock Development at Livingston and Veterans Memorial Roads Dear Mr. Strain, The intersection bordering the proposed development is very unique. It is because Veterans Memorial Road doesn’t go anywhere east or west to other dissipating roads. Both ends are dead ends.Therefore all traffic onto or off of Veterans will go either North or South on Livingston alone for at least 2+ miles each way before this traffic is dissipated to an east or west road. Veterans Memorial will not absorb traffic or bring it elsewhere. Veterans Memorial may be completed to the West in years or decades in the future. All of the new traffic from the high density development will be added to Livingston - an already congested road. We should all be concerned regarding the significant increase in accidents that will occur at the left turn lane to go west on to Veterans Memorial from the drivers coming North on Livingston such as the parents dropping off students. There are many other U turns along Livingston which will be affected also. Few drivers know that the Florida law states - “after a driver makes a left hand turn the driver must be in the far left hand lane in that road going in the opposite direction”. This of course is the “fast lane” of the new direction traffic flow. This intersection already causes risks by observing the present skid marks in both directions. There are many other left hand turn lanes on this 4 mile stretch between Bonita Beach Road and Immokalee Road. Parents make this left hand turn daily before classes start and later after school. School buses also make this turn in the mornings. The long length of the buses take up extra space in the left turn lane. Therefore the number of cars are limited in that turn lane with buses present. Some cars have to wait in the active road lane when the left turn lane is full. This left hand turn lane will also be used excessively due by the proposed development because the only exit from the development will be onto Livingston. For those that wish to go South toward Naples, the additional drivers will have to make a left hand turn at this intersection of Veterans Memorial and Livingston. A left hand turn is where most crashes occur nationally as documented below. What percentage of drivers go South? Probably 50%.This important issue was not noted in the 69 page traffic analysis report presented to the county. If one assumes that 50% of the drivers from the the high density proposal will go south toward Naples, then there would be a substantial number, especially in the morning, for school drop-offs and also during rush hour turning left. There is already a existing backup - also not mentioned in the report (the analysis was done after school started). The increase from the excessive number of additional cars is a disaster waiting to happen due to these unique features of this intersection. Of course it will be impossible to fix any traffic problem after the fact by changing the road. Prevent the obvious now by denying the development proposal. There is no question that this left turn traffic will increase substantially due to the proposed developmental design by having the only exit onto Livingston Road. I have three references pertinent to left hand turns and their safety issues which is a cause of 30% to more than 50% of crashes nationally based on various studies. My first reference is from 2017 in an issue of the International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology’s article: Pedestrian safety under permissive left-turn signal control. The article discusses the risk of pedestrian injuries and death. It was shown that the volume increase of left-turn lanes is directly related to the higher statistics. The numbers of injuries and deaths will increase significantly from the density of this development! The drivers are found to be more aggressive in such situations with pedestrians. This study was performed in a simulator to obtain such important information. There is increase risk with the longer distance walk such as with 4 lanes or more across intersections. Our intersection has 6-7 lanes going North with the lefthand lane included. There probably will surely be an increase in crashes from the new development with more adults and children walking from the development based on predictable studies. The second article was in the Claims Journal Magazine: Are Left Turns a Deadly Maneuver? This article states "that left turns are at the top of the list as being the most challenging and dangerous driving maneuvers”. The National Highway Traffic Safety report stated that about half of crashes in the US involve left turns. The risk increases with rain, headlight glare, distraction by cell phones, confusion with the blinking yellow arrow, the speed of the oncoming traffic and the increase in speeding to "make the light", being complacent or new at the intersection, misjudging distances especially in older drivers with poor vision, etc. With new residents constantly moving in and out of rental units, there is a learning curve in regard to the skill needed with this particular left hand turn. In 2004 UPS eliminated left turns for it’s drivers. FedX also has such restrictions due to the risk. Trucks can’t speed up quickly after the turn and there is the risk of being rear-ended from fast moving vehicles coming from behind. The third publication was a 267 page dissertation at the University of Central Florida in Orlando. The candidate who performed the research, diagrams, photography, and statistics was Kirolos Haleem. On page 18, paragraph 4 he quoted that of the 1.72 million crossing path crashes, 75% were from left turns and of those: 41.6% were at signalized intersections 36.3% when a stop sign was present 22.1% at an intersection with no controls (this is a surprising statistic). It won’t help at our intersection by placing a red arrow. Livingston Road is known as a “Racetrack” due to commuters using this road in lieu of the other close North/South roads of 75 and 41. Livingston is a favorite due to having only two traffic lights within the four mile stretch. One light is at the intersection of Livingston and Veterans Memorial where the proposed development is being considered. Drivers don’t want to stop or slow their commute time down. The human visual system cannot determine if an oncoming vehicle is going 60 mph or 45 mph even with 20/20 acuity. This is a setup for a crash if a driver is making a left-hand turn in front of the oncoming traffic. Add other causative factors such as the oncoming driver running a red light, the turning driver is too slow to speed up, distraction, not “seeing” an oncoming motorcycle, poor vision etc. and the result is a terrible crash. We should all be concerned regarding the significant increase in accidents that will occur at the left turn lane to go west on Veterans Memorial from the drivers coming North on Livingston. Many U turns will increase due to this need. There are many other U turns along Livingston which will be affected also. Few drivers know the Florida law that states - “after a driver makes a left hand turn the driver must be in the far left hand lane in that road going in the opposite direction”. This of course is the “fast lane” of the new direction traffic flow. This intersection already causes risks by observing the present skid marks in both directions. Previous Collier County officials were correct in their original zoning designation for this area.The neighborhood should retain it’s advantages and quality of life for which the area is known. It should not be changed. Other land will be sold in this proximity in the near future. Signs are already seen adjacent to and across Livingston Road from Barrington Cove.Will this also be zoned for high density development? Such density should be allowed elsewhere for many reasons. Tim Diegel timdiegel@mac.com From: Susan Mulgrew <1982swm@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, November 26, 2018 12:27 AM To: MarkStrain@colliergov.net; SchmidtCorby Subject: Objection to Allura Re-Zoning Attachments: The Strand Master Property Owners Ass Allura letter.docx Gentlemen: Attached please find a letter from The Strand Master Property Owners Association outlining our objections to the upcoming re-zoning request from Stock Development regarding the development of the Allura Apartments. As a community of 1073 residences nearby, WE STRONGLY OBJECT to this project for the reasons in the attached letter. Thank you so much for your consideration. Susan Mulgrew, President The Strand Master Property Owners Association From: Thomas Griffith <thomasm.griffith@icloud.com> Sent: Monday, November 26, 2018 3:00 PM To: SchmidtCorby Subject: Opposition to - PETITION #PL-20170004419/CP-2018-1 Dear Mr. Schmidt – I’m writing in regards to my opposition to the Allura project, petition #PL-20170004419/CP-2018-1 to the rezoning so 420 rental apartments can be built on this property. My self and the majority of the people I know are not opposed to single family homes being built in this area. We are opposed to the property being rezoned so 420 rental apartments can be built. The rental apartments will house a minimum of 735 tenants and does not fit into the landscape of this area. Traffic - Immokalee Rd. to Bonita Beach Rd. has no East/West exits for 4.2 miles. Regularly and every week day during season traffic is backed up on Livingston every afternoon for hours from Bonita Beach Rd. south to Veterans Memorial Blvd. and further. To get my son to baseball practice in Bonita I have to go south to Immokalee to 41 then north to Bonita. These 420 rental apartments will certainly add to this congestion. Home Values - Most studies show at least a 12.7% decline in property values near multifamily rental apartments. There is a perceived stigma with apartments having higher crime and less desirable tenants. Whether this is true or not doesn’t matter as it’s the perceived stigma that keep people from buying homes next to rental apartments. Schools – What will the impacts be on the schools? Veterans Memorial Elementary is already at capacity and North Naples Middle School is at 86% capacity. I hope you can support the thousands of residents that oppose a project that is not consistent with the current land uses in the area and will have a negative impact to our investments and quality of life. Thanks. Tom From: ljvonromer@gmail.com Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2018 4:39 PM To: SaboJames Subject: Re: Allura apt. complex @ Livingston & Veterans Thank you, for prompt reply. I drive by that property on a regular basis & have seen no posted signage regarding the proposed rezoning or a meeting for the public. Can you tell me what the current zoning is, what is the proposed rezoning, & when the meeting is? I appreciate your assistance. Thank you Sent from Windows Mail From: SaboJames Sent: Tuesday, September 4, 2018 4:05 PM To: ljvonromer@gmail.com Mr or Ms. Von Romer: Please pardon the greeting line as I cannot determine your gender from the signature line. I am not able to answer your questions about the applicant’s rationale for the project. However, the applicant is permitted to request rezoning of the property that they own or have under contract. Importantly, there is a Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) this week for the project and you would be able to ask your questions directly to the applicant or their agents. Allura NIM Thursday, 9/6/18 5:30 PM Collier County Library Main Branch Orange Blossom Drive Sugden Theater Room Please contact me with any other questions. Respectfully, C. James Sabo, AICP Principal Planner Zoning Division James.Sabo@colliercountyfl.gov 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples Florida 34104 Phone: 239.252.2708 “Tell us how we are doing by taking our Zoning Division Survey at https://goo.gl/eXjvqT.” Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From: ljvonromer@gmail.com <ljvonromer@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2018 11:23 AM To: SaboJames <James.Sabo@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Allura apt. complex @ Livingston & Veterans Good Morning Mr. Sabo, I have a couple of questions: Why is multi family being considered instead of single family? Neighboring communities demonstrate the demand for single family homes. I recognize that there are mixed single & multi family developments nearby. Then why is such a high density of apartments under consideration? In no way can it be a measure to satisfy low income or even middle income renters as it is being advertised as a high end, resort style community. Perhaps a plan calling for single family & condos should be discussed. I'm sure the developer could make those numbers work just as well @ this location. I am very familiar w highest @ best use of land & long term planning. In this case, I believe this density is not wise or in the best interest of the citizens of Collier County. Best regards, L. J. Von Romer Sent from Windows Mail From: Melissa Eger <melissa@presstigeprinting.com> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2018 5:59 PM To: CasanovaAlexandra Cc: SaboJames; SmithCamden; VelascoJessica Subject: RE: Property Owner Letter - PL20160002426 - FPL Fiber Net VA Attachments: Property Owner Letter + Site Map - PL20160002426 - FPL Fiber Net.pdf Hi Alexandra, I am confirming receipt of this mailing request. We are set to mail out the attached Property Owners Letter & Site Map to the 120 records provided via First Class Mail on Tuesday Nov. 27th, 2018. Best Regards, MELISSA EGER MAIL PRODUCTION MANAGER | Presstige Printing 10940 Harmony Park Drive | Bonita Springs, FL 34135 Direct: 239-949-8518 x1013 presstigeprinting.com Make the most of your direct mail! Ask me about FusionDM! From: CasanovaAlexandra Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2018 11:08 AM To: Melissa Eger Cc: SaboJames; SmithCamden; VelascoJessica Subject: Property Owner Letter - PL20160002426 - FPL Fiber Net VA Melissa, Good morning. Please mail out this property owner letter on Monday November 26, 2018. Thank you in advance, Alexandra Casanova Operations Coordinator - Zoning Division 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, FL 34104 Phone: 239-252-2658 Note: Email Address Has Changed Alexandra.casanova@colliercountyfl.gov Tell us how we are doing by taking our Zoning Division Survey at http://bit.ly/CollierZoning. Exceeding Expectations Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From: Tim Diegel <timdiegel@mac.com> Sent: Monday, August 27, 2018 6:12 AM To: SaboJames Cc: Bill Arndt; Anne-Marie Cadwallader Subject: VeteransMemorial/Livingston Project (see attachments) Attachments: Full article re development.pdf; Are Left Turns a Deadly Maneuver?.eml https://www.claimsjournal.com/magazines/special-report/2014/09/29/255159.htm Dear Mr Sabo, I have a few comments to be made regarding the above project and am unable to attend the September 6th meeting. I have two points of concern. The ﬁrst is the number of parking spaces per apartment unit . The second is a serious safety concern regarding the signiﬁcant increase in accidents that will occur at the left turn lane to go West on Veterans Memorial from the drivers going North on Livingston. I was not able to ﬁnd the required number of parking spaces per apartment unit for the zoning of new construction in Naples. I did, however, ﬁnd the “new” zoning requirements in 2010 for the number of parking spaces required in Jacksonville, FL. At that time the statistics showed that 16% of its residents did not drive.This was in 2010 before the population surge. For a one bedroom apartment, 1.75 parking spaces were required. This passes the “logical test” since most couples have two cars but some of these units would be rented by one person. Some don’t drive. The number also probably includes guest parking. Based on this logical ratio, the proposed development above based on the same ratio and assuming 420 1 bedroom units, there must be 735 spaces. I didn’t count the number of parking spaces on the development drawing but I doubt that there are that number. ﬁle:///.ﬁle/id=6571367.8598229560 I’m sure that the TR Transportation Consultants are expert statisticians and very knowledgeable but one has to be cautious and not be overly impressed by their 69 page analysis. I assume that they were hired by the developers. Their conclusions stated that during rush hour in the morning 104 cars will exit onto Livingston and during rush hour in the afternoon 107 cars will enter off of Veterans Memorial. Incidentally, on page 10, it was documented that the analysis was performed “after school started”. There is usually a backup during the school year on the left turn lane onto Veterans Memorial. This is caused by parents dropping there kids off at the school down he road. This create a credibility issue with the study since it was not identiﬁed. In summary of my ﬁrst issue, the Jacksonville logical ratio of cars per unit (1.75) does not ﬁt here where there is not room for 735 spaces in the drawing. The out/in numbers noted above make no logical sense. These facts are obvious. One would really wonder about the future trafﬁc information statistics given in the report that are based on "yet to be proven" information. My second issue involves the left hand turn for drivers coming North on Livingston and making a left hand turn onto Veterans Memorial. Parents make this left hand turn as mentioned above, before classes start and later ﬁle:///.ﬁle/id=6571367.8598229560 after school. This left hand turn lane will be used excessively due to the proposed development because the only exit from the development is onto Livingston. For those that wish to go South toward Naples, the drivers will make a left hand turn at the intersection of Veterans Memorial and Livingston. A left hand turn is where most crashes occur as documented below. What percentage of drivers go South? This important statistic was not noted as far as I could tell in the 69 page report. If one assumes that 50% will go South toward Naples, then there would be a substantial number especially during rush hour, in addition to the parents. There is already a backup - not mentioned in the report. There is no question that this left turn trafﬁc will increase substantially due to the proposed development design having the only exit onto Livingston. There are three references pertinent to left hand turns and their safety issues which is a cause of 30% to more than 50% of crashes based on various studies. My ﬁrst reference is from 2017 in an issue of International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology’s article: Pedestrian safety under permissive left-turn signal control. The article discusses the risk of pedestrian injuries and death. It was shown that the volume of left-turn lanes is directly related. The drivers are found to be more aggressive in such situations. ﬁle:///.ﬁle/id=6571367.8598229560 This study was performed in a simulator to obtain important information. There is increase risk with a longer walk such as with 4 lanes across as with our intersection. I’m not sure about how many kids walk to school now but there will be an increase with the new development. The second article was in the Claims Journal Magazine (attached): Are Left Turns a Deadly Maneuver? This article states "that left turns are at the top of the list as being the most challenging and dangerous driving maneuvers”. The National Highway Trafﬁc Safety report stated that about half of crashes in the US involve left turns. The risk increases with rain, headlight glare, distraction by cell phones, confusion with the blinking yellow arrow, being complacent or new at the intersection, misjudging distances, etc. In 2004 UPS eliminated left turns for it’s drivers. The third article was a 267 page dissertation for the University of Central Florida in Orlando. The candidate who performed the research, diagrams, photography, and statistics was Kirolos Haleem. On page 18, paragraph 4 he quoted that the 1.72 million crossing path crashes, 75% were from left turns and of those: 41.6% were at signalized intersections 36.3% when a stop sign was present ﬁle:///.ﬁle/id=6571367.8598229560 22.1% at an intersection with no controls (this is a surprising statistic). It won’t help at our intersection by placing a red arrow. What I recommend. 1. Do not approve the zoning change include renters. According to the studies, it would be valid to expect an increase in auto and pedestrian accidents at the necessary left turn lane due to the unfamiliarity for new residents that “come and go”. 2. Do not approve the zoning for an excessive amount of units per acre. There is not enough room for all the cars. The less residents, the less accidents at the left turn lane. Believe the logical parking space per unit ratio as stated in Jacksonville of 1.75 cars per unit. A reasonable person would agree with this and not with the ﬁgure of 105+/- cars leaving and entering during the rush hours stated by the consultants. Thanks for reading this long email which I feel is so important for safety reasons with the proposal high density, the design of the exit on Livingston, and the zoning request to include renters. I tried to make succinct points. Please contact me with any questions. I have more information, if needed. Thank you. Tim Diegel. 952-239-0004. timdiegel@mac.com ﬁle:///.ﬁle/id=6571367.8598229560 1 VelascoJessica From:Tim Diegel <timdiegel@mac.com> Sent:Tuesday, August 21, 2018 1:24 PM To:Tim Diegel Subject:Are Left Turns a Deadly Maneuver? https://www.claimsjournal.com/magazines/special-report/2014/09/29/255159.htm Are Left Turns a Deadly Maneuver? By Jim Hyatt | September 29, 2014 The act of driving is deceptively simple and, for most of us, part of our daily routines. Safe driving, which requires focus and attention, is becoming more of a defensive act every day, thanks in large part to the use of cellphones. Left turns are at the top of the list of the most challenging and dangerous driving maneuvers. In 2013, 31 percent of Arbella Insurance Group’s severe accidents – claims totaling at least $100,000 in bodily injury and property damage – involved a left-turning vehicle. The insurance industry should be communicating the risks of left turns – as well as the benefits of avoiding them – to their insureds. In addition, municipalities should continue to make changes to roads and intersections to lessen the risk for drivers. The U.S. Department of Transportation reports that nationwide, 53.1 percent of crossing-path crashes involve left turns. Additionally, a study by New York City transportation planners found that left turns were three times as likely to cause a deadly crash involving a pedestrian. 2 Why Left Turns? The reason making a left turn is so complex is because the act itself disrupts the flow of traffic. Drivers must judge the speed and distance of oncoming cars, battle the glare of headlights, and watch for motorcycles, bicycles and pedestrians – many of whom are becoming increasingly distracted themselves. Driving requires vigilance when watching and reacting to other drivers, and making a left turn is one of the greatest risks. Nationwide, 53.1% of crossing-path crashes involve left turns. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) reports that close to half of the 5.8 million car crashes in the U.S. are intersection-related and the majority of those are the result of making a left turn. If you’re still skeptical about the potential hazards of left turns, consider this scenario: You’re on your way home from work and it’s raining. Traffic on the highway is heavy, other drivers are carelessly weaving through lanes and you realize that you have been on autopilot going 60 mph for the past 20 minutes of your commute. Finally, you’re in your neighborhood, just around the corner from your home – waiting at an intersection to turn left. You’ve done this drive hundreds, maybe thousands, of times, and you take for granted that when you inch out into oncoming traffic, other drivers will let you into their path – those same drivers who may be distracted by smartphones and on autopilot themselves. These false assumptions happen all too frequently. The NHTSA reports that of the 787,236 intersection-related crashes that were reported from 2005 to 2007, 30 percent were attributed to drivers’ “decision errors,” such as driving too fast or too aggressively, making false assumptions about others’ actions, illegal maneuvers, or misjudgment of the gap or the other car’s speed. Environment- attributed reasons were at 1.4 percent, while 78.6 percent of the crashes occurred in clear weather. 3 What Can Be Done? Is anything being done to address such hazardous driving behavior? In response to the high probability of left turn accidents, municipalities nationwide have changed roads and intersections in an attempt to lessen the risks of intersection- related or left turn accidents. Some of these changes include installing Jersey barriers to prevent left turns on specific roads, jug handles, rotaries and left turn arrows on traffic lights. The New York State Department of Transportation found that these adjustments are working: Their research found a 50 percent reduction in accidents after adding left turn-specific lanes at intersections and a 54 percent reduction where there was also a left turn signal. The case for eliminating left turns altogether may seem extreme, but the benefits are overwhelmingly positive. In 2004, UPS eliminated left turns for its drivers as part of a route-optimization strategy. Since then the company has saved an estimated 10 million gallons of gas and drivers have been able to deliver more packages in even less time. For UPS and the average American commuter alike, a route that avoids left turns may be longer, but moving with the flow of traffic rather than against it makes for less idle time, greater fuel efficiency and safer driving conditions. So what can the insurance industry do to help mitigate the risks associated with this problem? We must communicate the dangers involved with left turns and encourage our insureds to make the maneuver as safe and risk-free as possible. Arbella does this by sharing safety information with agents and customers. Recommendations include using intersections controlled by left turn arrows, jug handles or rotaries; paying close attention to distracted pedestrians; staying alert when combating the sun or oncoming headlight glare; and paying close attention to other vehicles’ speed and actions, rather than anticipating what they will be. 4 Consider also communicating the benefits of eliminating left turns from daily driving routines – the average commuter may be surprised to know that consecutive right turns are faster and more fuel-efficient. Could the future of driving be free of left turns? Perhaps, but it’s unlikely. Thankfully, vehicle-to-vehicle technology has reportedly advanced to such a degree that the NHTSA could start requiring it in all new vehicles as soon as 2020. Having this technology on the road could prevent as many as 592,000 left turn and intersection crashes a year, saving 1,083 lives. But until a rolling stock of these vehicles is on the highway, left turns will continue to pose serious risks to drivers, and we need to continue to mitigate those risks through increased communication and improved engineering on all roads across the United States. From: roberta hawkins <roblhawkins@hotmail.com> Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2018 12:34 PM To: SaboJames Cc: roberta hawkins Subject: Vote no on Allura rezoning request I am writing to voice my objection to the proposed development at Livingston Road and veterans. I live in Mediterra and the traffic along Livingston is terrible, particularly at rush-hour. There are times that you’re risking your life trying to get out of our community. At rush-hour it’s dead stop traffic lined up from I 75 and Bonita Beach Road to well south of us. Secondly, Livingston Road is one and two-story homes in villas gated communities from Bonita Beach Road until well south of Immokalee . A 50 foot tall development of 420 units is not in keeping with the area. We are also very concerned with a rental community based on what we’ve heard of the legal issues in Orchid Run. There are also articles outlining that dense rental communities lower adjacent property values by 13.7%. I am asking that the zoning not be changed to allow this density. Or rental community. I would also like to see if Collier and Lee County’s could do something to improve the traffic on Livingston.I’ve been at advise that we were rejected for a light at the mediterra gates. Turning right and trying to do a U-turn is almost as difficult because it takes you to the Vasari entrance and people are trying to get in and out of the communities so that isn’t an option. Or at least a poor option. Please vote against this rezoning and allow it to stay as it is with the density it is presently approved for. Thank you, Roberta Hawkins 16687 Lucarno Way Sent from my iPad From: BN Prins <bnprins@yahoo.com> Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2018 3:27 PM To: SaboJames Subject: Website Inquiry Allura 420 apartment complex Hello Mr. Sabo I live in one of the communities, off Livingstone Rd, that will be effected if the Allura complex is built. We are all concerned about the extra traffic this complex will add to an already busy street, Livingston. I know a traffic study was commissioned, but unless you travel this street daily, you know that the addition of hundreds of cars, will create a traffic jam. We are all also concerned about the extra burden to be placed on the schools in the area. Why would the county allow a 4 story apartment complex to be built. There are no other such complexes in North Naples. I would like to know what is the next step in the rezoning process? How can I be best informed about the updates Thank you Nanette Prins Sent from Mail for Windows 10 ALLURA RPUD Rezoning Environmental Information (January 2018) The Allura RPUD project is 35.57± acres in size. The majority of this site consists of forested lands with varying degrees of exotic infestation. The site was hit by Hurricane Irma on September 10, 2017. Prior to the hurricane, melaleuca (Melaleuca quinquenervia) was common in the canopy and Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolius) was common in the mid story. Throughout the property the hurricane force winds blew down many of the melaleuca and also at least temporarily reduced the density of Brazilian pepper in the midstory via defoliation, uprooting, or crushing by fallen trees. Numerous native trees, primarily bald cypress (Taxodium distichum) and to a lesser extent slash pine (Pinus elliottii), were also either blown down or snapped off. This has resulted in a somewhat open canopy and a very open midstory. There is currently 33.49± acres of native vegetation (as defined by Collier County LDC Section 3.05.07.A.1) on the property. This consists of all of the Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System Codes except for 450, 619, and 740 as shown on the attached Vegetation Map. Please see the attached Protected Species Assessment for a discussion of the current site conditions. Craig M. Smith of DexBender prepared the Protected Species Assessment. Mr. Smith has been employed as a full time environmental consultant in southwest Florida since 1987. A copy of his credentials is attached. Y:\STOCK-17\County\Zoning\County Zoning Info.Docx ALLURA RPUD Sections 12 and 13, Township 48 South, Range 25 East Collier County, Florida Protected Species Assessment January 2018 Prepared for: Stock Development, LLC 2639 Professional Circle, Suite 101 Naples, FL 34119 Prepared by: DexBender 4470 Camino Real Way, Suite 101 Fort Myers, FL 33966 (239) 334-3680 1 INTRODUCTION The 35.57 acre project is located within a portion of Sections 12 and 13, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. The parcel is bordered to the north by Veterans Memorial Boulevard, to the east by the Barrington Cove residential development, to the south by the Barrington Cove residential development and undeveloped land, and to the west by Livingston Road, a fire station, and undeveloped lands. SITE CONDITIONS The majority of this site consists of forested lands with varying degrees of exotic infestation. The site was hit by Hurricane Irma on September 10, 2017. Prior to the hurricane, melaleuca (Melaleuca quinquenervia) was common in the canopy and Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolius) was common in the mid story. Throughout the property the hurricane force winds blew down many of the melaleuca and also at least temporarily reduced the density of Brazilian pepper in the midstory via defoliation, uprooting, or crushing by fallen trees. Numerous native trees, primarily bald cypress (Taxodium distichum) and to a lesser extent slash pine (Pinus elliottii), were also either blown down or snapped off. This has resulted in a somewhat open canopy and a very open midstory. VEGETATIVE CLASSIFICATIONS The predominant vegetation associations were mapped in the field on 2017 digital 1” = 200’ scale aerial photography. The aerial depicts pre-hurricane conditions. The property boundary was obtained from the Rhodes and Rhodes Land Survey, Inc. and inserted into the digital aerial. Twelve vegetation associations were identified using the Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCCS). Figure 1 depicts the approximate location and configuration of these vegetation associations and Table 1 summarizes the acreages by FLUCCS Code. A brief description of each FLUCCS Code is also provided below. Table 1. Acreage Summary by FLUCCS Code FLUCCS CODE DESCRIPTION ACREAGE 411E1 Pine Flatwoods Invaded by Exotics (10 – 25%) 1.85 411E2 Pine Flatwoods Invaded by Exotics (26 – 50%) 1.78 411E4 Pine Flatwoods Invaded by Exotics (76 – 90%) 0.73 450 Exotic Upland Hardwoods 0.41 618E Willow Invaded by Exotics (5 – 9%) 1.73 619 Exotic Wetland Hardwoods 1.00 3 FLUCCS CODE DESCRIPTION ACREAGE 619 Exotic Wetland Hardwoods 1.00 621E2 Cypress Invaded by Exotics (26 – 50%) 3.74 621E3 Cypress Invaded by Exotics (51 – 75%) 6.40 624E2 Cypress - Pine Invaded by Exotics (26 – 50%) 0.57 625DE2 Drained Hydric Pine Flatwoods Invaded by Exotics (26 50%) 14.90 625E2 Hydric Pine Flatwoods Invaded by Exotics (26 – 50%) 1.79 740 Disturbed Land 0.67 Total 35.57 FLUCCS Code 411E1, Pine Flatwoods Invaded by Exotics (10 – 25%) Upland pine flatwoods are present in the western portion of the site adjacent to Livingston Road. Slash pine and scattered melaleuca are present in the canopy. The midstory consists of wax myrtle (Myrica cerifera), cabbage palm (Sabal palmetto), dahoon holly (Ilex cassine), and swamp bay (Persea palustris) with scattered areas of moderately dense Brazilian pepper. Ground cover is dominated by saw palmetto (Serenoa repens) with scattered bracken fern (Pteridium aquilinum) and grape vine (Vitis sp.). FLUCCS Code 411E2, Pine Flatwoods Invaded by Exotics (26 – 50%) The ground cover in portions of the upland pine flatwoods are dominated by a mosaic of saw palmetto and cabbage palm less than five feet in height. Slash pines and melaleuca are present in the canopy while Brazilian pepper and native shrubs are present in the mid story. FLUCCS Code 411E4, Pine Flatwoods Invaded by Exotics (76 – 90%) The canopy of the pine flatwoods in the western portion of the site along Livingston Road is dominated by melaleuca with scattered slash pine. Scattered Brazilian pepper and cabbage palm are present in the midstory. Ground cover consists primarily of leaf duff with scattered patches of grape vine, swamp fern (Blechnum serrulatum), and saw palmetto. FLUCCS Code 450, Exotic Upland Hardwoods In several locations, the uplands are dominated by exotics in both the canopy (melaleuca) and midstory (Brazilian pepper). Native trees as shown in the 2017 aerial photography have largely been blow down. FLUCCS Code 618E, Willow Invaded by Exotics (5 – 9%) The center of the cypress dome was a marsh that has become overgrown by willow (Salix caroliniana). Widely scattered bald cypress, pond apple (Annona glabra), Brazilian pepper, and buttonbush (Cephalanthus occidentalis) are also present. Ground cover consists of open water, mosquito fern (Azolla caroliniana), duckweed (Lemna sp.), fireflag (Thalia geniculata), primrose willow (Ludwigia sp.), and smartweed (Polygonum sp.). 4 Water levels were in excess of two feet along the perimeter of the area at the time of the listed species survey. FLUCCS Code 619, Exotic Wetland Hardwoods In several locations, the wetlands are dominated by exotics in both the canopy (melaleuca) and midstory (Brazilian pepper). Native trees as shown in the 2017 aerial photography have largely been blow down. Additional species present include swamp fern, cabbage palm, and climbing cassia (Senna pendula). FLUCCS Code 621E2, Cypress Invaded by Exotics (26 – 50%) The majority of the south central portion of the site consists of an old cypress dome. The canopy of the northern portion of this area is dominated by bald cypress with widely scattered melaleuca. The midstory consists of a mix of both native species (myrsine (Rapanea punctata), cabbage palm, and cocoplum (Chrysobalanus icaco)) and exotic species (Brazilian pepper). Ground cover consist primarily of swamp fern and shield fern (Thelypteris sp.). FLUCCS Code 621E3, Cypress Invaded by Exotics (51 – 75%) The southeasterly and southwesterly portions of the cypress head also have a canopy of bald cypress with scattered melaleuca. The midstory is dominated by Brazilian pepper with relatively few native species present. Ground cover consist primarily of swamp fern and shield fern. FLUCCS Code 624E2, Cypress - Pine Invaded by Exotics (26 – 50%) A small area with both bald cypress and slash pine in the canopy is present in the southwest corner of the site near the fire station. The hurricane winds appear to have substantially reduced the density of standing exotics within this area. FLUCCS Code 625DE2, Drained Hydric Pine Flatwoods Invaded by Exotics (26 – 50%) The northern portion of the site was historically transitional pine flatwoods. However, changes to the area’s hydrology caused by the surrounding developments have effectively drained this area such that it is no longer a functional wetland. The area is dominated by slash pine with varying densities of melaleuca. The midstory consists of bald cypress, cabbage palm, and myrsine with moderate levels of Brazilian pepper. Ground cover consist primarily of leaf duff, widely scattered patches of saw palmetto, swamp fern, and grape vine. FLUCCS Code 625E2, Hydric Pine Flatwoods Invaded by Exotics (26 – 50%) The outer northern and western edges of the cypress dome are still hydric pine flatwoods. The areas are dominated by slash pine with varying densities of melaleuca. The midstory consists of bald cypress and cabbage palm with moderate levels of Brazilian pepper. Ground cover consist primarily of swamp fern. FLUCCS Code 740, Disturbed Land The land immediately adjacent to Livingston Road along the west property line appears to have been cleared as part of either the road construction or maintenance of a powerline 5 easement. The area is dominated by weedy species such as pusley (Richardia sp.), whitehead broom (Spermacoce verticillata), beggarweed (Desmodium sp.), dog fennel (Eupatorium capillifolium), fingergrass (Eustachys petraea), coyote thistle (Eryngium sp.), bracken fern, and torpedo grass (Panicum repens). Scattered small melaleuca, slash pine, Brazilian pepper, and cabbage palm are also present. SURVEY METHOD Based on the general habitat types (FLUCCS Codes) identified on-site there is a very low potential for a limited number of species listed as endangered, threatened, or species of special concern by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) or the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) to potentially occur on the subject parcel. These species include gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus), American alligator (Alligator mississippiensis), eastern indigo snake (Drymarchon corais couperi), red- cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis), a variety of wading birds, Big Cypress fox squirrel (Sciurus niger avicennia), Florida bonneted-bat (Eumops floridanus), and Florida panther (Felis concolor coryi). The bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), which has been delisted by the FWC and FWS, is still protected by other regulations and was therefore included in the survey. The Florida black bear (Ursus americanus floridanus), delisted in 2012, is still protected by the Florida Black Bear Management Plan and was also included in the survey. Please see Table 2 for additional listed species included in the survey. In addition, per Collier County regulations three species of orchids (Cyrtopodium punctatum, Encyclia cochleata, and E. tampensis) and four species of wild pine (Tillandsia fasciculata, T. utriculata, T. balbisiana, and T. flexuosa) which could potentially occur on-site were included in the survey. In order to comply with FWC/FWS survey methodology guidelines, each habitat type was surveyed for the occurrence of the species listed above using meandering pedestrian belt transects. Observations for listed species were made during a specific protected species survey event. The meandering pedestrian belt transects were spaced approximately 95 feet apart. Additional observations were made from the perimeter of the willow pond. The approximate location of direct sighting or sign (such as tracks, nests, and droppings) of a listed species, when observed, was denoted on the aerial photography. The 1" = 200’ scale aerial Protected Species Assessment map (Figure 1) depicts the approximate location of the survey transects and the results of the survey. The listed species survey was conducted during the mid-day hours of December 6, 2017. The weather at the time of the survey was warm and sunny with a light breeze. Prior to conducting the protected species survey, a search of the FWC listed species database (updated in June 2017) was conducted to determine the known occurrence of listed species in the project area. This search revealed no known protected species occurring on or immediately adjacent to the site. The database indicated that Florida black bear have been recorded adjacent to the property (Figure 2). The Florida black bear is listed as threatened by the FWC but is not listed by the FWS. The property is Perm it Use Only - N ot For ConstructionProperty b oun dary is approximate.Map b ased o n dat a o bt ain ed fro m th e F lorida Fish and WildlifeConservation Commission. All ur a RPUD Section: 24Township: 45Range: 24 ³ Fig ure 2. Nui sa nc e Bear Calls M ap nm nmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnm nmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnm nm nm nmnmnm nmnmnm nm nmnmnm nmnm nmnm nmnm nm nm nmnm nmnm nmnm nmnm nm nm nm nm nm nm nm nm nm nm nm nmnmnmnmnmnmnm nmnm nm nmnmnm nm nm nm nm nm nm nm nmnm nm nm nm nm nm nm nm nm nmnm nmnm nm nmnmnmnmnmnm nm nm nm nm nmnm nm nm nm nm nmnm nm nm nm nm nm nm nm nm nm nm nm nm nm nmnmnm nmnmnm nmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnm Sour ce: Esr i, Dig it alG lobe , G eoE ye, Eart hs ta r G eog raphics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AEX,Ge tm a pping, Aer ogr id, I G N, I G P, swiss to po, and the GIS User Community 1/1 6/2018 1 0:02:23 AM Y:\STO CK-17\GIS_GPS\BearMap.mxd Fort My er s (23 9) 334-3680 - 0 0.25 0.50.125 Mil es6Legend nm Bla ck Be a r Nu is ance Calls Su bje c t Parcel Livingston RoadVeterans M em ori al B oul ev ard 7 within a wood stork core foraging area but not within panther Priority 1 or 2 zones. The property is also within the Florida bonneted bat consultation area. Table 2. Listed Species That Could Potentially Occur On-site FLUCCS CODE Percent Survey Coverage Species Name Present Absent 411E1 411E2 411E4 80 Eastern Indigo Snake (Drymarchon corais couperi) Gopher Tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) Red-cockaded Woodpecker (Picoides borealis) Southeastern American Kestrel (Falco sparverius paulus) Big Cypress Fox Squirrel (Sciurus niger avicennia) Florida Black Bear (Ursus americanus floridanus) Florida Panther (Felis concolor coryi) √ √ √ √ √ √ √ 450 80 None 618E 50 American Alligator (Alligator mississippiensis) Little Blue Heron (Egretta caerulea) Reddish Egret (Egretta rufescens) Tricolored Heron (Egretta tricolor) Wood Stork (Mycteria americana) √ √ √ √ √ 619 80 None 621E2 621E3 80 American Alligator (Alligator mississippiensis) Little Blue Heron (Egretta caerulea) Tricolored Heron (Egretta tricolor) Wood Stork (Mycteria americana) Big Cypress Fox Squirrel (Sciurus niger avicennia) Florida Black Bear (Ursus americanus floridanus) Florida Panther (Felis concolor coryi) √ √ √ √ √ √ √ 624E2 80 Little Blue Heron (Egretta caerulea) Tricolored Heron (Egretta tricolor) Big Cypress Fox Squirrel (Sciurus niger avicennia) Florida Black Bear (Ursus americanus floridanus) Florida Panther (Felis concolor coryi) √ √ √ √ √ 8 FLUCCS CODE Percent Survey Coverage Species Name Present Absent 625DE2 625E2 80 Eastern Indigo Snake (Drymarchon corais couperi) Little Blue Heron (Egretta caerulea) Red-cockaded Woodpecker (Picoides borealis) Tricolored Heron (Egretta tricolor) Big Cypress Fox Squirrel (Sciurus niger avicennia) Florida Black Bear (Ursus americanus floridanus) Florida Panther (Felis concolor coryi) √ √ √ √ √ √ √ 740 80 None SURVEY RESULTS Florida Bonneted Bat One dead slash pine and one live bald cypress containing potential cavities entrances were identified (Figure 1). No evidence of bat utilization (bat vocalization/chatter from within the potential cavities or guano on or around the snags) was observed. No artificial structures were observed on-site. An acoustic survey will be performed per FWS guidelines. Big Cypress Fox Squirrel One potential Big Cypress fox squirrel nest was observed within a melaleuca in the north central portion of the site. Future monitoring (prior to site clearing) will be required to determine if the nest is being actively used by Big Cypress fox squirrels. Collier County Plants Both butterfly orchids and stiff-leaved wild-pines (T. fasciculata) were observed in various locations across the site. Both species occur within the preserves and therefore, pursuant to Collier County LDC Section 3.04.03, there is no requirement to relocate butterfly orchids or stiff-leaved wild-pines into the preserves. Other Listed Species No other species listed by either the FWS or the FWC were observed on the site during the protected species survey or during other site visits. There is the potential for periodic opportunistic foraging by both listed and non listed species of wading birds within the wetlands. However, the amount of vegetative debris on the ground within the wetlands 9 (other than within the willow dominated area) caused by Hurricane Irma reduces the foraging opportunity for wading birds. In addition to the site inspections, a search of the FWC species database (updated in June 2017) revealed no additional known protected species within or immediately adjacent to the project limits. Y:\STOCK-17\County\Zoning\PSA.docx Current Responsibilities Project Manager providing an array of environmental studies and services related to land development and property evaluation in south Florida. These activities, performed for private landowners and public entities, include vegetation mapping, binding and informal state and federal wetland jurisdictional determinations, wetland functional assessments using UMAM, WRAP, and MWRAP, habitat evaluations, establishing seasonal high water elevations for wetlands using biological indicators, threatened and endangered species surveys, and wetland (COE, DEP, and WMD) permit applications. Additional services include threatened and endangered species relocation and management plans, wetland mitigation (creation, restoration, enhancement, and preservation) plans, and the design and implementation of wetland monitoring plans. Experience Joined the firm in 2003 bringing over 16 years of experience as an environmental consultant in South Florida. More than 274,000 acres of land has been mapped and evaluated since 1987. Individual properties ranged in size from less than one acre to more than 5,000 acres located in Collier, Lee, Charlotte, Sarasota, Polk, Hardee, Brevard, Martin, and Dade Counties. Projects have included agricultural, residential, commercial, and industrial land uses, new and expanding roadways, and wetland restoration (wetland mitigation banking). Wetland permitting experience includes wetland delineation, preparation of state and federal permit applications and supporting documents, responding to agency questions and third party concerns, and negotiating mutually acceptable wetland mitigation plans. Surveys and management plans have been conducted and prepared for gopher tortoises, eastern indigo snake, bald eagle, red- cockaded woodpecker, Florida bonneted bat, and Big Cypress fox squirrel. Has authorization from the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission to conduct surveys, prepare permit applications, and relocate gopher tortoises as an Authorized Gopher Tortoise Agent. Is qualified as an expert witness by the Lee County Hearing Examiner, Collier County Environmental Advisory Council, Collier County Planning Commission, and City of Bonita Springs Zoning Board on environmental issues. Recently completed and ongoing projects for the public and private sectors include monitoring of the Lely Area Stormwater Improvement Project’s (LASIP) Serenity Park, Craig M. Smith, Senior Ecologist wetland enhancement plan development, implementation, and monitoring for projects such as Barrington Cove, Marsilea, and Verona Pointe Estates, gopher tortoise permitting and relocation for several projects in Collier and Lee Counties, wetland permitting for Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club and Estero Crossing, and bald eagle management plan preparation for the Calusa Cay CPD on Pine Island. Education and Certification Master of Science, University of North Carolina at Wilmington, 1987. Bachelor of Science, Clarion University of Pennsylvania, 1984. Senior Ecologist, Ecological Society of America Professional Wetland Scientist (No. 238), Society of Wetland Scientists Certified Arborist (No. FL-6255A), International Society of Arboriculture Authorized Gopher Tortoise Agent (Permit No. GTA-09-00011E), Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Qualified Bald Eagle Monitor, City of Cape Coral Provisionally Certified Wetland Delineator, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Certification Program, 1993. Continuing Education Florida Master Naturalist Program – Freshwater Wetlands. University of Florida IFAS, 2012. Native Trees, Shrubs, and wildflowers for Central and South Florida: Zones 9-11. Florida Association of Native Nurseries. 2011. Unified Mitigation Assessment Method 201 Training. South Florida Water Management District. 2010. Florida Statewide (62-340 FAC) Wetland Delineation Training Program. Richard Chinn Environmental Training, Inc. 2007. Wetland Plant Identification Training Program. Richard Chinn Environmental Training, Inc. 2007. Unified Mitigation Assessment Method Training. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 2005. The Florida Master Wildlifer. University of Florida. Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences. 2003. Basic Prescribed Fire Training. Hillsborough Community College. 1992. Florida Wetlands Successful Creation, Restoration, and Enhancement Training Course #1. Natural Resources Training and Certification, Inc. 1991. Florida Hydric Soils Workshop. Florida Association of Professional Soil Classifiers. 1991. Affiliations Ecological Society of America Society of Wetland Scientists VISION • SOLUTIONS •PERFORMANCE Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Livingston Assemblage Livingston Road and Veterans Memorial Boulevard Naples, Florida Prepared For: Mr.Christopher Johnson Stock Development, LLC 2647 Professional Circle Naples, FL 34119 Prepared By: A•C•T Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc. 1875 West Main Street Bartow, Florida 33809 Your Compliance Partner! Report Date: December 29, 2017 A∙C∙T Project No.18972 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Livingston Assemblage Livingston Road Naples, Florida A∙C∙T Project No.18972 -ii- VISION • SOLUTIONS • PERFORMANCE CERTIFICATIONS The observations and research conducted in this investigation were based upon methods and procedures in general conformance with the American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM) Designation E 1527-13, “Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process”,and other practices which are customary and typical for the profession. Exceptions and deletions to the Standard Practice are described in detail where appropriate throughout the text. This Phase I Environmental Site Assessment was completed under the supervision of the environmental professional in accordance with Designation E 1527-13 (7.5.1). I attest that this Report is an accurate and authentic representation of the observations and Recognized Environmental Conditions encountered during the investigation. ____________________________________________ Michael A. Madonna I declare that, to the best of my professional knowledge and belief, I meet the definition of an environmental professional as defined in Section 312.10 of 40 CFR Part 312. I have the specific qualifications based on education, training, and experience to assess a property of the nature, history, and setting of the property. I have developed and performed all appropriate inquiries in conformance with the standards and practices set forth in 40 CFR Part 312. ________________________________May 8, 2017 James D. Stump, PG Copies of the qualifications for the environmental professionals who prepared this Report are found in Appendix A. December 29, 2017 _________________ Date December 29, 2017 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Livingston Assemblage Livingston Road Naples, Florida A∙C∙T Project No.18972 -iii- VISION • SOLUTIONS • PERFORMANCE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A∙C∙T Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc.(A∙C∙T) has performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) in conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM Designation E1527-13, “Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process”on the Livingston Assemblage located at the southeast corner of Livingston Road and Veterans Memorial Boulevard in Naples, Florida (the Subject Property, as described in Section 2.0 of this Report). Any exceptions to or deletions from this practice is described in Sections 1.7 and 4.0 of this Report. This assessment has revealed no evidence of Recognized Environmental Conditions in connection with the Subject Property. This summary does not contain all the information that is found in the full Report. The Report should be read in its entirety to obtain a more complete understanding of the information provided and to aid in any decisions made or actions taken based on this information. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Livingston Assemblage Livingston Road Naples, Florida A∙C∙T Project No.18972 -iv- VISION • SOLUTIONS • PERFORMANCE TABLE OF CONTENTS CERTIFICATIONS .....................................................................................................................II EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...........................................................................................................III 1.0 INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................6 1.1 Purpose and Objectives ......................................................................................................................6 1.2 User Contract and Warrantee .............................................................................................................7 1.3 Limitations of Assessment ...................................................................................................................7 1.4 Data Gaps ...........................................................................................................................................8 1.5 Authorization ........................................................................................................................................9 1.6 Access and Additional Information Sources ........................................................................................9 1.7 Deviations ..........................................................................................................................................10 2.0 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION ...............................................................................................11 2.1 Location and Legal Description .........................................................................................................11 2.2 Site and Vicinity Characteristics ........................................................................................................12 3.0 RECORDS REVIEW AND DOCUMENTATION ..................................................................13 3.1 Federal and State Regulatory Databases .........................................................................................13 3.2 Unmapped Facilities ..........................................................................................................................14 3.3 Local Records/Interviews ..................................................................................................................14 3.3.1 Subject Property Owner and User Interviews ............................................................................14 3.3.2 Collier County Fire Department ..................................................................................................15 3.4 Site History and Documentation ........................................................................................................15 3.4.1 City Directory Search .................................................................................................................15 3.4.2 Aerial Photography Review ........................................................................................................16 3.4.3 Property Appraiser Records .......................................................................................................17 3.4.4 Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps ....................................................................................................18 3.4.5 Soil Survey of Collier County .....................................................................................................18 3.4.6 Vapor Migration ..........................................................................................................................19 4.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE .................................................................................................20 4.1 Concerns from Surrounding Properties Review ................................................................................22 4.2 Other Potential Recognized Environmental Conditions ...................................................................22 5.0 FINDINGS AND OPINIONS ................................................................................................23 6.0 CONCLUSIONS..................................................................................................................24 7.0 REFERENCES ...................................................................................................................25 ACRONYMS .............................................................................................................................26 DEFINITIONS ...........................................................................................................................27 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Livingston Assemblage Livingston Road Naples, Florida A∙C∙T Project No.18972 -v- VISION • SOLUTIONS • PERFORMANCE LIST OF TABLES Table 1:Regulatory Database Search Results .........................................................................13 Table 2:Aerial Photograph Review ............................................................................................16 Table 3:Site Reconnaissance Summary ...................................................................................20 Table 4:Adjoining Sites Information ...........................................................................................22 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1:Site Location Map Figure 2:Topography Map Figure 3:Site Plan Figure 4:Adjoining Properties Map LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix A:Environmental Professional Qualifications Appendix B:Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Proposal Appendix C:Collier County Property Appraiser Information Appendix D:EDR Report Appendix E:Environmental Questionnaires/Interviews Appendix F:Historical Aerial Photographs,Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps, Soil Survey Map Appendix G:Photographic Documentation Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Livingston Assemblage Livingston Road Naples, Florida A∙C∙T Project No.18972 -6- VISION • SOLUTIONS • PERFORMANCE 1.0 INTRODUCTION This introduction establishes the purpose and objectives for the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) described below. It identifies special terms, conditions, and limitations inherent in the methods used to conduct the assessment.Moreover, it describes the relationship between the users and A∙C∙T Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc.(A∙C∙T ) and our warrantee that the investigation reflects a commercially prudent and reasonable inquiry to assess the environmental condition of the subject units of commercial real estate. Finally, it contains information on authorizations, access, and sources of certain data used in preparation of this Report. 1.1 Purpose and Objectives The purpose of this investigation is to provide a Phase I ESA Report for the Livingston Assemblage located at the southeast corner of Livingston Road and Veterans Memorial Boulevard in Naples, Collier County,Florida (the Subject Property).The Phase I ESA was conducted to identify, to the extent feasible, Recognized Environmental Conditions (RECs) in connection with the Subject Property.RECs are defined to mean the presence or likely presence of hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at a property,due to any release to the environment,under conditions indicative of a release to the environment,or under conditions that pose a material threat of a future release to the environment. Activities performed for this Phase I ESA included the following:a site visit to evaluate the current condition of the site and identify the presence of unusual conditions; an off-site reconnaissance and windshield survey of the surrounding properties; a review of historic information associated with the site and surrounding properties; regulatory research including a review of federal,state, and local regulatory records and databases for the site and regulated properties within a specified distance from the site; review of local pertinent agency records to determine the status of the site and sites listed in the database search as being of concern to the site; and personal interviews with individuals who have knowledge of the site and its use.Users of this Report, other than those listed in Section 1.2 of this document, should be aware of the limitations set forth in that and other sections. This Phase I ESA will contain four components, which form the basis of the Phase I ESA and are required to meet “All Appropriate Inquiry” (AAI) into the environmental status of the site in general Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Livingston Assemblage Livingston Road Naples, Florida A∙C∙T Project No.18972 -7- VISION • SOLUTIONS • PERFORMANCE accordance with ASTM Designation E 1527-13 “Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments:Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process”. This ASTM Standard Practice meets USEPA requirements under 40 CFR 312. The four components of the assessment are: records review, site reconnaissance, interviews, and report preparation. The purpose of the records review is to obtain and review site-specific regulatory and historical records that will be useful in identifying RECs in connection with the site. The objective of the site reconnaissance is to obtain directly observable information from reasonably accessible locations indicating the likelihood of identifying RECs at the site or on adjoining properties. Interview activities with individuals knowledgeable with the site provide information regarding the historical and current usage of the Subject Property. 1.2 User Contract and Warrantee The user of this Report is Stock Development, LLC.A∙C∙T warrants that findings and conclusions contained in this Report were accomplished in general accordance with methods set forth in the ASTM Standard Practice described above. These represent good commercial and customary practice for conducting a Phase I ESA of a property for the purposes of identifying RECs and contain the limitations inherent in the methods which are referred to in the ASTM Standard Practice and some of which are more specifically set forth below. The contractual obligation between A∙C∙T and Stock Development, LLC is intended to provide a truthful, overall assessment of the environmental condition of the site.The exchange of information about the site between A∙C∙T and Stock Development, LLC is unique and serves as the basis upon which this Report was prepared.Obligations to third party users are outside the scope of this contract and unauthorized reliance on information or conclusions contained in this Report will be at the third party's risk. 1.3 Limitations of Assessment No environmental assessment can totally eliminate uncertainty; however, the ASTM Standard Practice used in this assessment is intended to reduce uncertainty, to lessen ambiguity, and to exercise discretion regarding the environmental condition of the site. It should not be construed as an exhaustive assessment of the Subject Property. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Livingston Assemblage Livingston Road Naples, Florida A∙C∙T Project No.18972 -8- VISION • SOLUTIONS • PERFORMANCE Future environmental assessments should not be used to judge appropriateness of this assessment based on hindsight, new information, or use of developing technology and analytical methods. Methods used to gather information contained in this Report generally meet the standards of All Appropriate Inquiry contained within the ASTM Standard Practice and may be reliable for subsequent assessments, but such reliability should not be presumed. Although the reliability of information from public documents and other databases are assumed accurate, this assumption is also presumed for information from private sources. If conditions on the site change or if new information becomes available, subsequent inquiries may be necessary. Additionally, as noted by the legal analysis, some substances may be present on a property in quantities and under conditions that may lead to contamination of the site or of nearby properties but are not included in CERCLA’s definition of hazardous substances (42 U.S. c. §9601 (14)) or do not otherwise present potential CERCLA liability. As a result,there may be environmental issues or conditions that parties may wish to assess in connection with commercial/industrial real estate that are outside the scope of ASTM Designation E 1527-13 referred to as “additional issues” and the user may wish to assess the additional issues as a “business environmental risk”. 1.4 Data Gaps A data gap is a lack or inability to obtain information required by ASTM Designation E1527-13 despite good faith efforts by the environmental professional to gather such information. Data gaps may result from incompleteness in any of the activities required by this practice including, but not limited to, access issues associated with site reconnaissance, and the availability of appropriate personnel for interview activities. A data gap by itself is not inherently significant. A data gap is only significant if other information and/or professional experience raises reasonable concerns involving the data gap.Data gaps were identified during the preparation of this Phase I ESA. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Livingston Assemblage Livingston Road Naples, Florida A∙C∙T Project No.18972 -9- VISION • SOLUTIONS • PERFORMANCE A copy of an Environmental Questionnaire and Disclosure Statement was provided to Mr. Christopher Johnson of Stock Development, LLC, the Client, to forward to the various Property owner representatives. The purpose of this document was to obtain information from an individual with knowledge regarding historical and current usage of the Subject Property.As of the date of submittal of this report,A∙C∙T had not received a copy of a completed Environmental Questionnaire and Disclosure Statement from respective Property owners. The lack of completed Environmental Questionnaire and Disclosure Statement from the respective Property owners is considered a Data Gap per ASTM Standard E 1527-13. Mr. Christopher Johnson of Stock Development, LLC, was provided a copy of the User Questionnaire for the Subject Property, which requests specific information for a party seeking to qualify for Landowner Liability Protection to CERCLA liability. As of the date of submittal of this report,A∙C∙T had not received a copy of a completed questionnaire from Mr. Johnson.A copy of the User Questionnaire provided to Mr. Johnson is included in Appendix E.The lack of completed User Questionnaire is considered a Data Gap per ASTM Standard E 1527-13. 1.5 Authorization Authorization to perform this Phase I ESA was provided to A∙C∙T in the form of an agreement for services executed by Mr.Christopher Johnson of Stock Development, LLC on December 15, 2017 (Appendix B).The Project was initiated by A∙C∙T on December 18, 2017. 1.6 Access and Additional Information Sources In addition, the following information was provided to or collected by A∙C∙T: Site Plan Collier County Property Appraiser Legal Description Collier County Property Appraiser Key Site Contact Not Applicable-Vacant Densely Wooded Land Property Owners Various Owners-Thirteen (13)Parcels Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Livingston Assemblage Livingston Road Naples, Florida A∙C∙T Project No.18972 -10- VISION • SOLUTIONS • PERFORMANCE 1.7 Deviations The scope of services for this Phase I ESA specifically excludes work efforts related to the following items: Lead based paint testing Wetlands delineation Radon testing Cultural and historic resource evaluations Lead in drinking water testing Endangered species surveys Testing for airborne contaminants in interior spaces or HVAC Ecological resource evaluations Operational or regulatory compliance Health and safety evaluations Environmental audit services Industrial hygiene surveys Biological agent surveys Soil and/or groundwater testing activities Asbestos-Containing Building Materials surveys Mold testing High voltage powerline evaluations Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Livingston Assemblage Livingston Road Naples, Florida A∙C∙T Project No.18972 -11- VISION • SOLUTIONS • PERFORMANCE 2.0 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 2.1 Location and Legal Description The Subject Property referred to throughout this document consists of the Livingston Assemblage, located at the southeast corner of Livingston Road and Veterans Memorial Boulevard in Naples,Collier County,Florida, as shown in Figure 1 -Site Location Map. According to the Client, the Subject Property includes 13 parcels of real estate, totaling approximately 35-acres. The Collier County Property Appraiser (CCPA),Parcel Identification Numbers for the Subject Property are referenced below. Additional information referenced by the CCPA,including the applicable parcel/property owner,parcel legal description,and parcel acreage for each parcel associated with the Subject Property is reproduced below. The CCPA and Client provided information is included in Appendix C. Parcel ID #,Folio Number,Property Owner,Legal Description and Acreage Parcel 1 -This parcel was referenced in the Client provided information and located adjoining to the west of Parcel 2 on the northern portion of the Subject Property.The parcel details are not referenced by the CCPA.No additional information was available or provided for this parcel. Parcel 2 -Folio Number –00149200004 -Marc L Catalano Rev Trust;13 48 25 NE1/4 OF NW1/4 OF NW1/4 OF NE1/4 LESS W 30FT;2.27-acres Parcel 3 -Folio Number –00150280000 -RICHARD ALAN SOMMERVILLE TRUST;13 48 25 NW1/4 OF NE1/4 OF NW1/4 OF NE1/4 2.5 AC OR 1496 PG 625;2.5-acres Parcel 4 -Folio Number –00150160007 -MARC L CATALANO REV INTE TRUST;13 48 25 SE1/4 OF NW1/4 OF NW1/4 OF NE1/4 2.5 AC OR 1510 PG 2233;2.5-acres Parcel 5 -Folio Number –00150560005 -MARC L CATALANO REV INTE TRUST;13 48 25 SW1/4 OF NE1/4 OF NW1/4 OF NE1/4 2.5 AC OR 814 PG 1813;2.5-acres Parcel 6 -Folio Number –00148280009 -PARRISH, DOREEN L,DENNIS G BAAR REV LIV TRUST;13 48 25 SE1/4 OF NE1/4 OF NW1/4 OF NE1/4 + SW1/4 OF NW1/4 OF NE1/4 OF NE1/4 5 AC OR 249 PG 583; 5.0-acres Parcel 7 -Folio Number –00150520003 -MARLAC LLC;13 48 25 W1/2 OF SW1/4 OF NW1/4 OF NE1/4 5 AC OR 752 PG 1030; 5.13-acres Parcel 8 –Folio Number –00149840008 -MARLAC LLC;13 48 25 NE1/4 OF SW1/4 OF NW1/4 OF NE1/4; 2.5-acres Parcel 9 –Folio Number –00150400000 -MARLAC LLC;13 48 25 NW1/4 OF SE1/4 OF NW1/4 OF NE1/4 2.5 AC OR 837 PG 26; 2.5-acres Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Livingston Assemblage Livingston Road Naples, Florida A∙C∙T Project No.18972 -12- VISION • SOLUTIONS • PERFORMANCE Parcel 10 –Folio Number –00150440002 -MARLAC LLC;13 48 25 SE1/4 OF SW1/4 OF NW1/4 OF NE1/4 2.5 AC OR 1324 PG 929; 2.5-acres Parcel 11 –Folio Number –00149080004 -MARLAC LLC;13 48 25 SW1/4 OF SE1/4 OF NW1/4 OF NE1/4 2.5 AC OR 1768 PG 1688; 2.5-acres Parcel 12 –Folio Number –00150600004 -MARLAC LLC;13 48 25 NE1/4 OF NW1/4 OF SW1/4 OF NE1/4 2.5 AC OR 297 PG 86; 2.5-acres Parcel 13 –Folio Number –00148200005 -LIVVET LLC;13 48 25 NW1/4 OF NE1/4 OF SW1/4 OF NE1/4 2.5 AC OR 800 PG 1362; 2.5-acres 2.2 Site and Vicinity Characteristics According to the CCPA and information provided by the Client,the Subject Property is comprised of thirteen (13) contiguous parcels, which combined total approximately 35-acres of real estate. The CCPA has classified the parcels of the Subject Property with Property Use Codes 0 –Vacant Residential, and 99 –Acreage Not Zoned Agricultural.There were no physical addresses referenced by the CCPA for the 13 parcels of real estate associated with the Subject Property. The Subject Property was observed as undeveloped and densely wooded during site reconnaissance activities. The surrounding parcels currently consist of residential subdivisions, the North Naples Fire Department #48,and wooded/undeveloped land.The local land surface elevation of the Subject Property is approximately 11 feet above sea level (NGVD), as depicted on Figure 2 - Topography Map. The regional topographic relief in the vicinity of the Subject Property is generally flat and reportedly toward the east-southeast.Preserve areas and stormwater retention areas were observed associated with the Barrington Cove residential subdivision, located adjoining to the east, south, and southeast of the Subject Property.Stormwater (dry) retention areas were observed adjoining to the north of the Subject Property across Veterans Memorial Boulevard. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Livingston Assemblage Livingston Road Naples, Florida A∙C∙T Project No.18972 -13- VISION • SOLUTIONS • PERFORMANCE 3.0 RECORDS REVIEW AND DOCUMENTATION 3.1 Federal and State Regulatory Databases Information from standard federal and state environmental record sources was provided through Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR). Data from governmental agency lists are compiled into one database, which is updated as these data are released. This database also contains postal service data in order to enhance address matching.Records from one government source are compared to records from another to clarify any address ambiguities. The demographic and geographic information available provides assistance in identifying and managing risk. The accuracy of the geocoded locations is approximately +/-300 feet. Regulatory information was reviewed from database sources to identify regulated properties within the ASTM minimum search distance from the site.Results of this database search identified regulated properties within the search distances from the Subject Property.A copy of the regulatory database report is included in Appendix D.The environmental status of the facilities identified within the regulatory databases in the vicinity of the Subject Property is presented in Table 1. Table 1: Regulatory Database Search Results Facility and Address Distance and Direction from the S.P. Potential Impact to the S.P. Comments N. Collier Fire CTRL & RESC DIST #48 16280 Livingston Road Adjoining W Low The N. Collier Fire Department Station #48 located adjoining to the west of the Subject Property was identified within the AST database.One,1,500-gallon diesel fuel AST was reportedly installed at this fire station in January 2015. Based on the review of the Storage Tank Facility Site Inspection Report dated June 6, 2017, this facility was reported operating in compliance with applicable AST regulations per Chapter 62-762-F.A.C. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Livingston Assemblage Livingston Road Naples, Florida A∙C∙T Project No.18972 -14- VISION • SOLUTIONS • PERFORMANCE Facility and Address Distance and Direction from the S.P. Potential Impact to the S.P. Comments Regency Farm –Countyline Farm State Hwy 858 ~1200’ E Low This facility was identified within the AST database.Seven, 550-gallon ASTs for fuel oil were reportedly installed at this facility in August 1986 and in service at this time. Based on capacity, the ASTs associated with this facility are not regulated per Chapter 62-762, Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.) 3.2 Unmapped Facilities Livingston Road and Golden Gate Parkway was identified as a disaster debris staging area and was identified approximately 10-miles south of the Subject Property. Based on distance and regulatory status this facility does not appear to have the potential to impact the Subject Property at this time. 3.3 Local Records/Interviews The following agencies and/or knowledgeable parties were contacted concerning available information with regard to the Subject Property and the activities of other entities in the vicinity of the Subject Property. 3.3.1 Subject Property Owner and User Interviews A copy of an Environmental Questionnaire and Disclosure Statement was provided to Mr. Christopher Johnson of Stock Development,LLC,the Client, to forward to the various Property owner representatives.The purpose of this document was to obtain information from an individual with knowledge regarding historical and current usage of the Subject Property.As of the date of submittal of this report,A∙C∙T had not received a copy of completed Environmental Questionnaire and Disclosure Statement from the Property owners.A copy of the Environmental Questionnaire and Disclosure Statement provided to Mr.Johnson to forward to respective Property owners is included in Appendix E.The lack of a completed Environmental Questionnaire and Disclosure Statement from the respective Property owners is considered a Data Gap per ASTM Standard E 1527-13. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Livingston Assemblage Livingston Road Naples, Florida A∙C∙T Project No.18972 -15- VISION • SOLUTIONS • PERFORMANCE Mr. Christopher Johnson of Stock Development, LLC, was provided a copy of the User Questionnaire for the Subject Property, which requests specific information for a party seeking to qualify for Landowner Liability Protection to CERCLA liability.As of the date of submittal of this report,A∙C∙T had not received a copy of a completed questionnaire from Mr. Johnson.A copy of the User Questionnaire provided to Mr. Johnson is included in Appendix E.The lack of a completed User Questionnaire is considered a Data Gap per ASTM Standard E 1527-13. 3.3.2 Collier County Fire Department Based on the email correspondence dated December 20, 2017, received from the Greater Naples Fire Rescue District, there have been no reported incidents to the Subject Property in the past five (5) years for fires, petroleum releases,and/or hazardous waste spills.A copy of the email correspondence received from the Greater Naples Fire Rescue District is included in Appendix E. 3.4 Site History and Documentation 3.4.1 City Directory Search City directories from 2005 through 2017 for the site vicinity were obtained and reviewed during the preparation of this Phase I ESA.No city directories for the site vicinity prior to 2005 were available for review.The Subject Property is located in a historically rural and undeveloped area of Naples, Florida.Based on information obtained from the CCPA, there are no physical addresses for the 13 parcels of real estate associated with the Subject Property. Review of the city directories for the property located adjoining to the west at 16280 Livingston Road indicate that this property has been occupied by the North Collier Fire Control and Rescue District Station #48, since at least 2017. This address was not listed in the city directory listings reviewed prior to at least 2014. Review of the city directories for the property located in close proximity to the west at 15960 Veterans Memorial Boulevard indicate that this property has been occupied by Collier County School District-Veterans Memorial Elementary since at least 2008. This address was not listed in the city directory listings reviewed prior to at least 2007. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Livingston Assemblage Livingston Road Naples, Florida A∙C∙T Project No.18972 -16- VISION • SOLUTIONS • PERFORMANCE 3.4.2 Aerial Photography Review Available historical aerial photographs of the Subject Property and surrounding properties were examined for the years 1944, 1952, 1958, 1962, 1968,1975, 1980, 1986, 1993, 1999,2005 2006,2007,and 2010.Copies of the historical aerials reviewed are presented in Appendix F.A summary of the aerial photograph review is presented in Table 2. Table 2:Aerial Photograph Review Aerial Photograph Date Subject Property Adjacent Properties 1944 The Subject Property appeared wooded and undeveloped. The adjacent properties appeared wooded and undeveloped. 1952 The Subject Property appeared relatively unchanged compared to the 1944 photograph. The adjacent properties appeared relatively unchanged compared to the 1944 photograph. 1958 The Subject Property appeared relatively unchanged compared to the 1952 photograph. The adjacent properties appeared relatively unchanged compared to the 1952 photograph. 1962 The Subject Property appeared relatively unchanged compared to the 1958 photograph. The adjacent properties appeared relatively unchanged compared to the 1958 photograph. 1968 The Subject Property appeared relatively unchanged compared to the 1962 photograph. The adjacent properties appeared relatively unchanged compared to the 1962 photograph. 1975 The Subject Property appeared relatively unchanged compared to the 1968 photograph. The adjacent properties appeared relatively unchanged compared to the 1968 photograph. 1980 The Subject Property appeared relatively unchanged compared to the 1975 photograph. The adjacent properties appeared relatively unchanged compared to the 1975 photograph. 1986 The Subject Property appeared relatively unchanged compared to the 1980 photograph. The adjacent properties appeared relatively unchanged compared to the 1980 photograph. 1993 The Subject Property appeared relatively unchanged compared to the 1986 photograph. The adjacent properties appeared relatively unchanged compared to the 1986 photograph. 1999 The Subject Property appeared relatively unchanged compared to the 1993 photograph. The adjacent properties appeared relatively unchanged compared to the 1993 photograph. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Livingston Assemblage Livingston Road Naples, Florida A∙C∙T Project No.18972 -17- VISION • SOLUTIONS • PERFORMANCE It should be noted that the aerial photographs reviewed by A∙C∙T provide a gapped sequence of events about the subject property and adjoining properties. While these aerials may or may not reveal any specific environmental impacts, it must be remembered the information appearing in these aerials represents only a brief glimpse at historical activities in the area at the time the photos were made. 3.4.3 Property Appraiser Records There was no information in the Property Appraiser’s records that would identify RECs associated with the current use of the site.Information from the Property Appraiser’s records is found in Appendix C. Aerial Photograph Date Subject Property Adjacent Properties 2005 The Subject Property appeared relatively unchanged compared to the 1999 photograph. Livingston Road appeared constructed to the west of the Subject Property and Veterans Memorial Boulevard appeared constructed adjoining to the north of the Subject Property. The adjacent property to the north appeared cleared for residential development, including roadway infrastructure. The adjacent property to the northwest appeared developed with a residential subdivision. The adjoining properties to the south, east,and west appeared wooded and undeveloped. 2006 The Subject Property appeared relatively unchanged compared to the 2005 photograph. The Collier County Elementary School property appeared under construction in the regional area to the west of the Subject Property. Residential dwellings appeared constructed in the subdivision located adjoining to the north of the Subject Property. 2007 The Subject Property appeared relatively unchanged compared to the 2006 photograph. The Collier County Elementary School property appeared active, and additional residential dwellings appeared constructed within the residential subdivision located adjoining to the north of the Subject Property. 2010 The Subject Property appeared relatively unchanged compared to the 2007 photograph. The adjacent properties appeared relatively unchanged compared to the 2007 photograph. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Livingston Assemblage Livingston Road Naples, Florida A∙C∙T Project No.18972 -18- VISION • SOLUTIONS • PERFORMANCE 3.4.4 Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps are utilized to locate potential areas of environmental impairment as they often identify dry cleaners, service stations, or other facilities containing flammable materials. A search of available Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps was conducted by EDR for the Subject Property vicinity. In correspondence dated December 18,2017,A∙C∙T received information revealing that no Sanborn Fire Insurance Map coverage was available for the Subject Property (Appendix F). 3.4.5 Soil Survey of Collier County A review of the Soil Survey of Collier County revealed that the soils located on the Subject Property have been identified as Pineda fine sand, limestone substratum (14);Boca fine sand (21); and Boca, Riviera, limestone substratum and Copeland fine sands, depressional (25), as included in Appendix F. Pineda fine sand, limestone substratum (14)–consists of nearly level and poorly-drained soil located in sloughs and poorly-defined drainage ways. The slope is 0 to 2 percent. The permeability of this soil is moderate to moderately slow. The available water capacity is low. Under natural conditions, the seasonal high water table is within a depth of 12 inches for 3 to 6 month during most years. During the other months, the water table is below a depth of 12 inches, and it recedes to a depth of more than 40 inches during extended dry periods. During periods of high rainfall, the soil is covered by shallow, slowly moving water for about 7 days. Boca fine sand (21)–consists of nearly level,poorly-drained soil located on flatwoods. The permeability of this soil is moderate. The available water capacity is low. Under natural conditions, the seasonal high water table is at a depth of 6 to 8 inches for 1 to 6 months during most years. During the other months, the water table is below a depth of 18 inches, and it recedes to a depth of more than 40 inches during extended dry periods. Boca, Riviera, limestone substratum and Copeland fine sands, depressional (25)–consists of level,very poorly-drained soil in depressions, cypress swamps, and marshes.The permeability of the Boca soil is moderate and the available water capacity is very low.The permeability of the Riviera soil is moderately rapid to moderately slow, and the available water capacity is low. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Livingston Assemblage Livingston Road Naples, Florida A∙C∙T Project No.18972 -19- VISION • SOLUTIONS • PERFORMANCE The permeability in the Copeland soil is moderately slow, and the available water capacity is moderate. 3.4.6 Vapor Migration Vapor migration refers to the movement of hazardous substances or petroleum products in any form, including solid and liquid at the surface or subsurface, and vapor in the subsurface.A∙C∙T conducted a Tier 1 Vapor Encroachment Screening for the Subject Property in accordance with ASTM E2600-15. This screening process utilizes information collected as part of these Phase I ESA activities at the Subject Property.There were no regulated facilities identified within the minimum search distances of the Subject Property during these Phase I ESA activities.Based upon results of the Tier I screening, there are no vapor encroachment conditions (VECs) located in the vicinity of the Subject Property. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Livingston Assemblage Livingston Road Naples, Florida A∙C∙T Project No.18972 -20- VISION • SOLUTIONS • PERFORMANCE 4.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE The site reconnaissance was conducted by Mr.Michael Madonna of A∙C∙T on December 19, 2017. The environmental professional walked the perimeter of the Subject Property, which including the adjoining property boundary land berms, and municipal sidewalks and roads located in close proximity of the Subject Property. The roadways observed in close proximity to the Subject Property include Livingston Road to the west, Veterans Memorial Boulevard to the north,and Barclay Court,Aberdeen Avenue, and Aberdeen Way, which are located within the Barrington Cove residential subdivision, located adjoining to the east, southeast,and south of the Subject Property.During site reconnaissance activities, dense invasive trees, groundcover vegetation, and uprooted/downed trees (due to Hurricane Irma),were observed throughout the central portions of the site. The dense vegetation and uprooted trees limited access to the interior/central portions of the site during site reconnaissance activities.No access roads were observed leading onto the Subject Property from the perimeter roads located in the regional area of the Subject Property. During the site reconnaissance activities, the natural grade/elevation of the Subject Property was lower with respect to the municipal roadway elevations, and the elevation of the Barrington Cove subdivision, located adjoining to the east,southeast and south of the Subject Property. A∙C∙T conducted a survey of the surrounding areas from the site boundaries, recording observations and photo documenting the site and vicinity features.A site plan illustrating conditions observed during site reconnaissance activities is included as Figure 3.Photographs of the current site conditions are presented in Appendix G.A summary of the site reconnaissance is presented on Table 3. Table 3:Site Reconnaissance Summary Observations Present Comments Hazardous Substances No No evidence of hazardous substances was observed on the Subject Property during site reconnaissance activities. Petroleum Storage No No petroleum storage systems were observed on the Subject Property during site reconnaissance activities. Other Substance Storage No No other substance storage was observed on the Subject Property during site reconnaissance activities. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Livingston Assemblage Livingston Road Naples, Florida A∙C∙T Project No.18972 -21- VISION • SOLUTIONS • PERFORMANCE Observations Present Comments Stains or Corrosion No Stains and corrosion were not observed on the Subject Property during site reconnaissance activities. Heating/Cooling No No buildings were observed on the Subject Property during site reconnaissance activities. Floor Drains or Sumps No Floor drains or sumps were not observed on the Subject Property during site reconnaissance activities. Stressed Vegetation No No evidence of stressed vegetation was observed on the Subject Property during site reconnaissance activities. Storm Water and Sewage No No storm water or sewage activities were observed during site reconnaissance activities.Storm water retention areas were observed within the Barrington Cove residential subdivision located adjoining to the east, southeast and south of the Subject Property. Regional stormwater (dry)retention areas were observed constructed adjoining to the north of the Subject Property across Veterans Memorial Boulevard. Sanitary sewer manholes and lift stations were observed within the ROW easements along Livingston Road and Veterans Memorial Highway. Tanks, Pipes, and Vaults No Tanks, pipes, and vaults were not observed on the Subject Property during site reconnaissance activities. Electrical Transformers or PCBs No No transformers were observed on the Subject Property during site reconnaissance activities.Various municipal utility service providers including electric overhead power transmission lines, pole-mounted (non-PCB labeled) electric transformers,sanitary sewer, potable water,reclaimed water lines, natural gas transmission, and fiber optic communication system infrastructure were observed within the ROW easement at the intersection of Livingston Road and Veterans Memorial Boulevard,and on Veterans Memorial Boulevard along the northern Property boundary. Wells No No water wells were observed on the Subject Property during site reconnaissance activities. Dense vegetation and uprooted trees limited access to and observations of the interior/central portions of the Subject Property during site reconnaissance activities. Odors No No odors were observed during site reconnaissance activities. Pools of Liquid No No evidence of pools of liquid was observed on the Subject Property during the site reconnaissance activities. Drums No No drums were observed on the Subject Property during site reconnaissance activities. Pits, Ponds, and Lagoons No No pits, ponds, or lagoons for industrial purposes were observed on the Subject Property during site reconnaissance activities. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Livingston Assemblage Livingston Road Naples, Florida A∙C∙T Project No.18972 -22- VISION • SOLUTIONS • PERFORMANCE Observations Present Comments Solid Waste Minimal A minimal amount of solid waste, primarily convenience store rubbish,was observed discarded on the western and northern Property boundaries and the ROW associated with Livingston Road and Veterans Memorial Boulevard. Waste Water No No buildings were observed on the Subject Property during site reconnaissance activities. Waste water is not generated at the Subject Property at this time. Septic System No No evidence of a septic system was observed located on the Subject Property during site reconnaissance activities.Dense vegetation and uprooted trees limited access to and observations of the interior/central portions of the Subject Property during site reconnaissance activities. 4.1 Concerns from Surrounding Properties Review Adjoining properties were investigated from the site during the site reconnaissance.Surrounding properties include a Greater Naples Fire Station, residential subdivisions,and wooded/undeveloped land.A summary of the adjoining sites observed during reconnaissance activities is listed on Table 4 and Figure 4. Table 4: Adjoining Sites Information Direction from Property Sites Use North,Northeast and Northwest Residential Subdivisions and Golf Course Communities Residential East Residential Subdivision and Wooded/Undeveloped Land Residential and Undeveloped South Residential Subdivision Residential West Wooded Undeveloped Land,North Collier County Fire Station #48 Residential 4.2 Other Potential Recognized Environmental Conditions The site reconnaissance of the Phase I ESA revealed no evidence of other potential RECs from the site. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Livingston Assemblage Livingston Road Naples, Florida A∙C∙T Project No.18972 -23- VISION • SOLUTIONS • PERFORMANCE 5.0 FINDINGS AND OPINIONS Known or suspect environmental conditions identified during these Phase I ESA activities for the subject property have been summarized below: Review of regulatory records and historical resources revealed the presence of two regulated facilities within the ASTM minimum search distances from the Subject Property. However, based upon the database information for these facilities and/or their distances from the Subject Property, potential impacts from these regulated facilities are not expected to cause a Recognized Environmental Condition associated with the Subject Property at this time. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Livingston Assemblage Livingston Road Naples, Florida A∙C∙T Project No.18972 -24- VISION • SOLUTIONS • PERFORMANCE 6.0 CONCLUSIONS A∙C∙T Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc.(A∙C∙T) has performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) in conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM Designation E 1527- 13 “Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process”for the Livingston Assemblage located at the southeast corner of Livingston Road and Veterans Memorial Boulevard in Naples, Collier County,Florida (the Subject Property). Any exceptions to or deletions from this practice are described in Sections 1.7 and 4.0 of this Report. This assessment has revealed no evidence of Recognized Environmental Conditions in connection with the Subject Property. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Livingston Assemblage Livingston Road Naples, Florida A∙C∙T Project No.18972 -25- VISION • SOLUTIONS • PERFORMANCE 7.0 REFERENCES American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM)Designation E 1527-13, “Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process”. Environmental Data Resources, Inc.;The EDR Radius Map Report with GeoCheck,Livingston Assemblage,Livingston Road and Veterans Memorial Boulevard, Naples, FL 34110; Inquiry #5140197.2s;December 18, 2017. Environmental Data Resources, Inc.;Certified Sanborn Map Report,Livingston Assemblage, Livingston Road and Veterans Memorial Boulevard, Naples, FL 34110; Inquiry #5140197.3; December 18, 2017. Environmental Data Resources, Inc.;The EDR Aerial Photo Decade Package,Livingston Assemblage, Livingston Road and Veterans Memorial Boulevard, Naples, FL 34110; Inquiry #5140197.5;December 19, 2017. United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service;Soil Survey of Collier County, Florida; 1998. Collier County Property Appraiser Office Website. United States Geological Survey 7.5 minute Topographic Quadrangle Map –Bonita Springs, Florida Quad; obtained from National Geographic Topographic Quads software. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Livingston Assemblage Livingston Road Naples, Florida A∙C∙T Project No.18972 -26- VISION • SOLUTIONS • PERFORMANCE ACRONYMS AST Aboveground Storage Tank ASTM American Society of Testing and Materials AULs Activity and Use Limitations CERCLIS Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Information System CERC-NFRAP Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information System, No Further Remedial Action Planned CONSENT Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees Coal Gas Former Manufactured Gas (Coal Gas) Sites CORRACTS Corrected Action Report Delisted NPL National Priority List -Delisted EPA United States Environmental Protection Agency ERNS Emergency Response Notification System FDEP Florida Department of Environmental Protection FINDS Facility Index System HMIRS Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System LUST Leaking Underground Storage Tank MLTS Material Licensing Tracking System NPL National Priority List NPL-Liens Federal Superfund Liens PADS PCB Activity Database System RAATS RCRA Administrative Action Tracing System RCRIS-SQG Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System Small Quantity Generator RCRIS-LQG Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System Large Quantity Generator RCRIS--TSD Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System Treatment Storage and Disposal ROD Records of Decision SHWS State Hazardous Waste SWF/LF Solid Waste Facility/ Landfill Database TRIS Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System TSCA Toxic Substances Control Act USGS United States Geologic Survey UST Underground Storage Tank NGVD National Geodetic Vertical Datum Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Livingston Assemblage Livingston Road Naples, Florida A∙C∙T Project No.18972 -27- VISION • SOLUTIONS • PERFORMANCE DEFINITIONS ASTM Designation E1527-13 defines a Recognized Environmental Condition (REC) as the presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products, in, on or at a property,due to any release to the environment; under conditions indicative of a release to the environment; or under conditions that pose a material threat of a future release to the environment. De minimis-The term REC is not intended to include de minimis conditions that generally do not present a threat to human health or the environment and that generally would not be the subject of an enforcement action if brought to the attention of appropriate governmental agencies. Conditions determined to be de minimis are not RECs nor controlled RECs. A Controlled Recognized Environmental Condition (CREC) is a REC resulting from a past release of hazardous substances or petroleum products that has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority (for example, as evidence by the issuance of a no further action letter or equivalent, or meeting risk-based criteria established by regulatory authority), with hazardous substances or petroleum products allowed to remain in place subject to the implementation of required controls (for example, property use restrictions, activity and use limitations, institutional controls, or engineering controls). A Historic Recognized Environmental Condition (HREC) is a past release of any hazardous substance or petroleum products that has occurred in connection with the property and has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority or meeting unrestricted use criteria established by a regulatory authority, without subjecting the property to any required controls (for example, property use restrictions, activity and use limitations, institutional controls, or engineering controls). “Property” is defined as the real property that is the subject of the environmental site assessment described in this practice. Real property includes buildings, and other fixtures and improvements located on the property and affixed to land. Fire Insurance Map -The term fire insurance maps means maps produced for private fire insurance map companies (in example Sanborn™ Fire Insurance Maps) that indicate uses of properties at specified dates and that encompass the property. These maps are often available at local libraries, historical societies, private resellers, or from the map companies who produce them. FIGURES 0 10.5 Miles Legend Approx. Property Boundary Figure:1 18972 1" = 1 Mile 18972_Fig1.arc IJT 12/29/2017 JS Site Location Map Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Livingston Assemblage Livingston Road and Veterans Memorial Boulevard Naples, Collier County, Florida OpenStreetMap Date: Scale: ArcMap File: Created By: Project No.: Approved By: Source: 1875 West Main StreetBartow, Florida 33830P # 863.533.2000F # 863.534.1133 © OpenStreetMap (and) contributors, CC-BY-SA ^_ ^_Approx. Property Location 0 1,000500 Feet Legend Approx. Property Boundary Figure:2 18972 1" = 1,000' 18972_Fig2.arc IJT 12/29/2017 JS Topography Map Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Livingston Assemblage Livingston Road and Veterans Memorial Boulevard Naples, Collier County, Florida USGS Date: Scale: ArcMap File: Created By: Project No.: Approved By: Source: 1875 West Main StreetBartow, Florida 33830P # 863.533.2000F # 863.534.1133 Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i-cubed 0 300150 Feet Legend Approx. Property Boundary Figure:3 18972 1" = 300' 18972_Fig3.arc IJT 12/29/2017 JS Site Plan Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Livingston Assemblage Livingston Road and Veterans Memorial Boulevard Naples, Collier County, Florida Labins Date: Scale: ArcMap File: Created By: Project No.: Approved By: Source: 1875 West Main StreetBartow, Florida 33830P # 863.533.2000F # 863.534.1133 Veterans Memorial Boulevard Livingston Road 0 500250 Feet Legend Approx. Property Boundary Figure:4 18972 1" = 500' 18972_Fig4.arc IJT 12/29/2017 JS Adjoining Properties Map Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Livingston Assemblage Livingston Road and Veterans Memorial Boulevard Naples, Collier County, Florida Labins Date: Scale: ArcMap File: Created By: Project No.: Approved By: Source: 1875 West Main StreetBartow, Florida 33830P # 863.533.2000F # 863.534.1133 Undeveloped Land Undeveloped Land Undeveloped Land Undeveloped Land Residential Golf Course Residential Residential Residential Fire Station Veterans Memorial Boulevard Livingston RoadVacant Commercial Land APPENDIX A ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS Michael Alan Madonna Environmental Site Assessment Project Manager Michael Madonna is an Environmental Site Assessment Manager who has been actively involved in Florida's environmental consulting industry since 1998. Mr.Madonnas’responsibilities have included project scheduling and implementation, managing subcontractors and personnel, equipment,materials and interaction with client and multiple local, state and federal agencies. Representative Project Experience Performed and managed Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessments throughout Florida, Georgia,Louisiana, Michigan, South Carolina, North Carolina, Nevada, Virginia,Tennessee, Texas,and Idaho,for the banking industry. Properties have included agricultural, commercial,educational,industrial, residential subdivisions and golf course property transactions. Managed remedial action work at several sites throughout Florida for private land owners, financial institutions, private developers, County regulatory agencies, FDEP Storage Tank, FDEP Waste Cleanup and Petroleum Cleanup Sections. Managed Aboveground Storage Tank (AST)and Underground Storage Tank (UST)Closures. Client Manager for Manatee County Environmental Resource Management Department.Responsible for implementing and managing Phase I and Phase II Environmental Assessments,Site Assessments, Source Removal /Remedial Action Projects. Assisted with Aviation projects. Project Manager Manage and perfo Education Bachelor of Science, In Biology w/ Secondary Education St. Francis College of PA, 1990 Loretto, Penn. Training 40-Hour HAZWOPER Training Ground Penetrating Radar-Utility Scan-Geophysical Survey Systems, Inc. FDEP Field Sampling Training Course FDEP Hands-On Field School for Petroleum Contamination Cleanup Environmental Technology Center Sampling Certificates Professional Profile JAMES STUMP, P.G. VISION • SOLUTIONS • PERFORMANCE Mr. James Stump, P.G. has more than 29 years of professional environmental consulting experience. Areas of expertise include investigations associated with environmental due diligence, soil and groundwater quality assessments, remedial activities associated with contaminated sites and Brownfields studies. Mr. Stump also has extensive project experience which includes relationships with private and public sector clients and regulatory personnel. Mr. Stump has also been involved with multiple aspects of field activities associated with environmental investigations including Phase I and Phase II Environmental Site Assessments and soil and groundwater sampling. REPRE SENTATIVE PROJECT EXPERIENCE  Environmental due diligence activities (Phase I/Phase II Environmental Site Assessments) at multiple locations in support of real property transactions and to evaluate/manage environmental risks. Project locations have included well over 100 industrial, commercial, agricultural, residential, and governmental sites throughout the State of Florida.  Groundwater quality assessments for various chemicals, including petroleum products, metals, pesticides, and other hazardous-related products.  Remedial activities associated with contaminated media from aboveground and underground petroleum storage tanks.  Site rehabilitation activities associated with multiple dry cleaner facilities at locations throughout the State of Florida. Site rehabilitation activities completed have included detailed subsurface sampling and stratigraphic investigations utilizing SPT, direct push, sonic, and geophysical technologies; and aquifer testing activities utilizing single and multiple wells.  Brownfields investigations including field activities and report documentation of site inventories, Phase I and Phase II ESAs, contaminated soil and solid waste removal/disposal, and preparation of bid specifications and construc- tion drawings.  Development of groundwater monitoring plans for municipal wastewater sprayfields and abandoned landfills.  Ground penetrating radar and electromagnetic investigations to locate shallow buried features including underground storage tanks and buried debris and materials associated with landfilling activities. Education University of South Florida Master of Science Geology Eastern Illinois University Bachelor of Science Geology Professional Registration Certified Professional Geologist A.I. P.G. #9728 Registered Professional Geologist: Florida #1311 Georgia #1422 Florida Licensed Asbestos Inspector #11516410 APPENDIX B PHASE I ESA PROPOSAL CCOORRPPOORRAATTEE OOFFFFIICCEE 11887755 WWeesstt MMaaiinn SSttrreeeett ·· BBaarrttooww,, FFLL 3333883300 wwwwww..AA--CC--TT..ccoomm 886633..553333..22000000 VISION · SOLUTIONS · PERFORMANCE November 17, 2017 Mr. Christopher Johnson Stock Development 2647 Professional Circle Suite 1201 Naples, FL 34119 SUBJECT: PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT PROPOSAL +-32 ACRES LIVINGSTON ASSEMBLAGE LIVINGSTON AND VETERANS MEMORIAL BLVD COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA A∙C∙T PROPOSAL #20628.17 Dear Mr. Johnson: Thank you for this opportunity for A∙C∙T Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc. (A∙C∙T) to present this cost proposal to perform a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) for the commercial property referenced above. The purpose of the Phase I ESA is to identify, to the extent feasible, recognized environmental conditions in connection with the property. The Phase I ESA will be performed in general accordance with ASTM Designation E 1527-13 Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process. Our proposed scope of services includes the activities described the following section. 1.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES: 1.1 Phase I ESA 1.1.1 Review information provided by the Client, including the A·C·T Environmental Questionnaire, previous site investigations or assessments, legal descriptions, and chains-of- title. The chain-of-title documents shall include all deeds, easements, leases, restrictions, covenants, and cleanup liens from the past 50 years. These Client-provided documents will be reviewed for evidence of activities, which may have environmentally adverse implications. [Please note: If you wish, we will be happy to obtain a 50-year Environmental Chain-of-Title for you if you have not already obtained one, to be performed on a time and materials basis.] 1.1.2 Obtain and review relevant and readily available Federal, State, and Local environmental regulatory agency information concerning registered underground and aboveground fuel storage tanks, registered hazardous waste generating and disposal sites, landfills, and release of hazardous or regulated substances within the ASTM minimum required databases and search radii. 2 1.1.3 Evaluate previous uses and/or occupancy of the property from 1950 to the present, and, if available, prior to 1950 by review of one or more of the following standard historical sources.  Aerial Photographs  City Directories  Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps In some instances, sources may not identify the uses back to 1950, in which case the uses back to the earliest date development was identified will be presented. Actual records or sources reviewed may vary depending on whether they are reasonably ascertainable, practically reviewable, useful, and within the cost and/or time constraints imposed. 1.1.4 Conduct a site reconnaissance to obtain information indicating the likelihood of existing recognized environmental conditions associated with the property. The reconnaissance will consist of systematically traversing the property to provide an overlapping field of view. In the event that visibility or access is limited, such as due to heavy vegetation, water bodies, or size, these conditions will be noted in the final report. In general, when access or visibility problems are encountered, the site reconnaissance will be restricted to the perimeters of the property and to areas such as paths and roadways that are readily accessible for visual observations. Adjoining properties will be observed from the perimeter of the property. For large property assessments it sometimes becomes necessary to perform the site reconnaissance with specialized equipment. Reconnaissance with specialized equipment may include use of company airplane, air boat, jon boat, off-road vehicles, etc. A written request will be prepared and submitted for authorization if such specialized equipment is determined to be necessary to provide due diligence for reconnaissance activities. All use of specialized reconnaissance equipment will be done so on a time and materials basis. Property improvements, such as buildings, sheds, and warehouses, will be entered for reconnaissance purposes, except where access is limited or safety concerns prohibit entry. The reconnaissance will be for the observation of readily accessible and visible areas and does not include hidden areas or areas which would require destructive access, such as looking under floors, above ceilings, or behind walls. Arrangements for access, such as notification of tenants, will be the responsibility of the Client and should be made prior to the site reconnaissance. Where appropriate, observations and notes will be made concerning:  General property setting, current and past uses  Geologic, hydrogeologic, hydrologic, and topographic conditions  Improvements (structures, roads, utilities)  Hazardous substances and petroleum products  Storage tanks, vents, fill pipes, access ways  Odors (strong, pungent, or noxious)  Drums, containers of hazardous/unknown substances and petroleum products 3  PCB-containing equipment  Stains, corrosion, and stressed vegetation  Drains, sumps, pits, ponds, and lagoons  Solid waste, wastewater, wells, and septic systems The adjoining properties will be observed from the subject site during the site reconnaissance. Visual observations will be made of current and past land uses, wherever apparent, as well as any obvious environmental conditions. The adjacent properties will not be entered. Where possible, photographs will be taken to document observations. 1.1.5 Conduct Interviews, as deemed necessary, with any of the following by phone, in writing, or in person to obtain information indicating recognized environmental conditions associated with the property and adjoining properties:  Key Site Manager (as identified by Client)  Occupants/Tenants  Local Governmental Officials (if possible or pertinent) 1.1.6 Prepare a report of our findings and provide the Client with one (1) digital copy of the Report. The Report will include information obtained during the assessment regarding recognized environmental conditions at the property, documentation, and copies of data obtained and conclusions based upon this information. 2.0 EXCLUSIONS A∙C∙T’s scope of services for this project specifically excludes work efforts related to the following items. If the Client desires to have investigations of these types of items conducted, A∙C∙T will provide or arrange to provide these services as additional work.  Lead based paint  Asbestos containing materials  Radon  Lead in drinking water  Testing for airborne contaminants in interior spaces or HVAC Operational or Regulatory Compliance Environmental Audit services  Phase II Investigations  Wetlands  Cultural and historic resources  Industrial Hygiene  Health and Safety  Ecological resources 4  Endangered species  Biological agents  Mold & Mildew 3.0 TIME SCHEDULE Due date is twenty days from receipt of signed contract authorization. 4.0 PROJECT COSTS Phase I ESA and Report ........................................................................................................... $3,200.00 A∙C∙T strives to be a competitive environmental contracting/consulting firm while maintaining a high quality product for its clientele. To do this effectively A∙C∙T must specify what conditions each project is based upon. Certain conditions or situations may occur during the course of project work which may adversely impact the project costs. Additional work will not begin without prior express authorization. This cost estimate, as presented, is strictly based upon client communications and the attached Terms and Conditions. NOTE: A Phase I ESA is an objective assessment of a specific property(ies) and is intended to identify, to the extent feasible, recognized environmental conditions in accordance with ASTM Designation: E 1527-13 Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process. Because the Phase I ESA is an objective assessment, the recommendations and conclusions arrived at by the certified assessor may or may not benefit the Client and may directly affect the outcome of any associated property transaction. Regardless of the recommendations and conclusions reached by the certified assessor and/or of the completion of any associated property transaction, payment will be expected in the amount identified above in accordance with the whole of this estimate and the attached Terms and Conditions. 5 All of us at A∙C∙T look forward to working with you on this project. As always, we will commit our personnel, resources, and experience in a manner to allow for an environmentally sound, safety conscious, and cost effective plan to rapidly and successfully complete any assignment to your satisfaction. Please carefully review proposal. Should you desire A∙C∙T to perform this work, please execute this agreement in the space provided, make a copy for your own files, and return the original to A∙C∙T . Scanned and e-mailed copies are acceptable. If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact Floy R. Graves directly at (863) 533-2000, ext.211. I look forward to hearing from you. Sincerely, _____________________________ Floy R. Graves Client Development A∙C∙T Proposal No. 20628.17 accepted: Signature*: __________________________ Printed Name & Title: _____________________________ Company: __________________________ Date: ______________________________ * - Signature to be performed by individual authorized to contractually bind the client. Qualifying signature indicates authorization for A∙C∙T to commence with scope of services, acceptance to pay for Services as presented, and acknowledges receipt, review, and acceptance of A∙C∙T Terms and Conditions attached hereto. APPENDIX C PROPERTY APPRAISER RECORDS Print New Search Tax Bills Change of Address $ 0 $ 120,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 283,750 $ 0 $ 283,750 $ 34,050 $ 249,700 $ 283,750 $ 249,700 Parcel No.00149200004 Site Adr. Name / Address MARC L CATALANO REV TRUST 11935 SW 15TH CT City DAVIE State FL Zip 33325-4633 Map No.Strap No.Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 3A13 000100 013 3A13 13 48 25 2.27 Legal 13 48 25 NE1/4 OF NW1/4 OF NW1/4 OF NE1/4 LESS W 30FT Millage Area 97 Millage Rates *Calculations Sub./Condo 100 - ACREAGE HEADER School Other Total Use Code 99 - ACREAGE NOT ZONED AGRICULTURAL 5.122 5.8384 10.9604 Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) Date Book-Page Amount 12/09/11 4744-3042 11/28/11 4744-3049 08/18/98 2452-2101 03/16/90 1513-346 03/01/64 163-873 2017 Certified Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Land Value ( +)Improved Value ( =)Market Value ( - )10% Cap ( =)Assessed Value ( =)School Taxable Value ( =)Taxable Value If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after theFinal Tax Roll Property Summary Property Detail Aerial Sketches Trim Notices Page 1 of 1Details 12/18/2017http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/RecordDetail.html?sid=1020880270&ccpa... Collier County Property AppraiserProperty Aerial Parcel No.00149200004 Site Adr. Open GIS in a New Window with More Features. Page 1 of 1 12/18/2017http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/RecordDetail.html?sid=1020880270&ccpaver=1710181149... $ 0 $ 40,000 $ 0 $ 312,500 $ 0 $ 312,500 $ 129,487 $ 183,013 $ 312,500 $ 183,013 Collier County Property AppraiserProperty Summary Parcel No.00150280000 Site Adr. Name / Address RICHARD ALAN SOMMERVILLE TRUST 3580 7TH AVE NW City NAPLES State FL Zip 34120-1608 Map No.Strap No.Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 3A13 000100 040 3A13 13 48 25 2.5 Legal 13 48 25 NW1/4 OF NE1/4 OF NW1/4 OF NE1/4 2.5 AC OR 1496 PG 625 Millage Area 97 Millage Rates *Calculations Sub./Condo 100 - ACREAGE HEADER School Other Total Use Code 99 - ACREAGE NOT ZONED AGRICULTURAL 5.122 5.8384 10.9604 Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) Date Book-Page Amount 11/08/04 3675-1026 01/08/90 1496-625 05/01/67 237-465 2017 Certified Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Land Value ( +)Improved Value ( =)Market Value ( - )10% Cap ( =)Assessed Value ( =)School Taxable Value ( =)Taxable Value If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after theFinal Tax Roll Page 1 of 1 12/18/2017http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/RecordDetail.html?sid=1020880270&ccpaver=1710181149... Collier County Property AppraiserProperty Aerial Parcel No.00150280000 Site Adr. Open GIS in a New Window with More Features. Page 1 of 1 12/18/2017http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/RecordDetail.html?sid=1020880270&ccpaver=1710181149... $ 0 $ 75,800 $ 16,500 $ 0 $ 0 $ 312,500 $ 0 $ 312,500 $ 37,500 $ 275,000 $ 312,500 $ 275,000 Collier County Property AppraiserProperty Summary Parcel No.00150160007 Site Adr. Name / Address MARC L CATALANO REV INTE TRUST 11935 SW 15TH CT City DAVIE State FL Zip 33325-4633 Map No.Strap No.Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 3A13 000100 037 3A13 13 48 25 2.5 Legal 13 48 25 SE1/4 OF NW1/4 OF NW1/4 OF NE1/4 2.5 AC OR 1510 PG 2233 Millage Area 150 Millage Rates *Calculations Sub./Condo 100 - ACREAGE HEADER School Other Total Use Code 99 - ACREAGE NOT ZONED AGRICULTURAL 5.122 5.8384 10.9604 Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) Date Book-Page Amount 08/25/05 3876-1546 03/08/90 1510-2233 06/01/88 1360-1656 06/01/88 1360-1655 02/01/67 232-106 2017 Certified Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Land Value ( +)Improved Value ( =)Market Value ( - )10% Cap ( =)Assessed Value ( =)School Taxable Value ( =)Taxable Value If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after theFinal Tax Roll Page 1 of 1 12/18/2017http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/RecordDetail.html?sid=1020880270&ccpaver=1710181149... Collier County Property AppraiserProperty Aerial Parcel No.00150160007 Site Adr. Open GIS in a New Window with More Features. Page 1 of 1 12/18/2017http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/RecordDetail.html?sid=1020880270&ccpaver=1710181149... $ 0 $ 525,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 312,500 $ 0 $ 312,500 $ 129,487 $ 183,013 $ 312,500 $ 183,013 Collier County Property AppraiserProperty Summary Parcel No.00150560005 Site Adr. Name / Address MARC L CATALANO REV INTE TRUST 11935 SW 15TH CT City DAVIE State FL Zip 33325-4633 Map No.Strap No.Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 3A13 000100 047 3A13 13 48 25 2.5 Legal 13 48 25 SW1/4 OF NE1/4 OF NW1/4 OF NE1/4 2.5 AC OR 814 PG 1813 Millage Area 150 Millage Rates *Calculations Sub./Condo 100 - ACREAGE HEADER School Other Total Use Code 99 - ACREAGE NOT ZONED AGRICULTURAL 5.122 5.8384 10.9604 Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) Date Book-Page Amount 08/25/05 3876-1542 05/06/05 3792-3078 06/01/79 814-1813 06/01/76 652-589 2017 Certified Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Land Value ( +)Improved Value ( =)Market Value ( - )10% Cap ( =)Assessed Value ( =)School Taxable Value ( =)Taxable Value If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after theFinal Tax Roll Page 1 of 1 12/18/2017http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/RecordDetail.html?sid=1020880270&ccpaver=1710181149... Collier County Property AppraiserProperty Aerial Parcel No.00150560005 Site Adr. Open GIS in a New Window with More Features. Page 1 of 1 12/18/2017http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/RecordDetail.html?sid=1020880270&ccpaver=1710181149... $ 0 $ 0 $ 312,500 $ 0 $ 312,500 $ 37,500 $ 275,000 $ 312,500 $ 275,000 Collier County Property AppraiserProperty Summary Parcel No.00148280009 Site Adr. Name / Address PARRISH, DOREEN L DENNIS G BAAR REV LIV TRUST PO BOX 933 City SEAHURST State WA Zip 98062 Map No.Strap No.Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 3A13 000100 001 53A13 13 48 25 5 Legal 13 48 25 SE1/4 OF NE1/4 OF NW1/4 OF NE1/4 + SW1/4 OF NW1/4 OF NE1/4 OFNE1/4 5 AC OR 249 PG 583 Millage Area 150 Millage Rates *Calculations Sub./Condo 100 - ACREAGE HEADER School Other Total Use Code 99 - ACREAGE NOT ZONED AGRICULTURAL 5.122 5.8384 10.9604 Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) Date Book-Page Amount 03/28/13 4908-204 11/27/67 249-583 2017 Certified Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Land Value ( +)Improved Value ( =)Market Value ( - )10% Cap ( =)Assessed Value ( =)School Taxable Value ( =)Taxable Value If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after theFinal Tax Roll Page 1 of 1 12/18/2017http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/RecordDetail.html?sid=1020880270&ccpaver=1710181149... Collier County Property AppraiserProperty Aerial Parcel No.00148280009 Site Adr. Open GIS in a New Window with More Features. Page 1 of 1 12/18/2017http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/RecordDetail.html?sid=1020880270&ccpaver=1710181149... $ 800,000 $ 2,300,000 $ 1,200,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 400,100 $ 0 $ 400,100 $ 114,600 $ 285,500 $ 400,100 $ 285,500 Collier County Property AppraiserProperty Summary Parcel No.00150520003 Site Adr. Name / Address MARLAC LLC 25397 N NORTHBRIDGE RD City HAWTHORN WOODS State IL Zip 60047-7359 Map No.Strap No.Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 3A13 000100 046 3A13 13 48 25 5.13 Legal 13 48 25 W1/2 OF SW1/4 OF NW1/4 OF NE1/4 5 AC OR 752 PG 1030 Millage Area 150 Millage Rates *Calculations Sub./Condo 100 - ACREAGE HEADER School Other Total Use Code 0 - VACANT RESIDENTIAL 5.122 5.8384 10.9604 Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) Date Book-Page Amount 08/13/10 4596-980 12/09/05 3944-3620 05/20/05 3804-1028 05/17/78 752-1030 06/01/76 652-589 2017 Certified Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Land Value ( +)Improved Value ( =)Market Value ( - )10% Cap ( =)Assessed Value ( =)School Taxable Value ( =)Taxable Value If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after theFinal Tax Roll Page 1 of 1 12/18/2017http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/RecordDetail.html?sid=1020880270&ccpaver=1710181149... Collier County Property AppraiserProperty Aerial Parcel No.00150520003 Site Adr. Open GIS in a New Window with More Features. Page 1 of 1 12/18/2017http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/RecordDetail.html?sid=1020880270&ccpaver=1710181149... $ 800,000 $ 525,000 $ 0 $ 100 $ 0 $ 100 $ 100 $ 100 $ 100 Collier County Property AppraiserProperty Summary Parcel No.00149840008 Site Adr. Name / Address MARLAC LLC 25397 N NORTHBRIDGE RD City HAWTHORN WOODS State IL Zip 60047-7359 Map No.Strap No.Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 3A13 000100 029 3A13 13 48 25 2.5 Legal 13 48 25 NE1/4 OF SW1/4 OF NW1/4 OF NE1/4 2.5 AC Millage Area 150 Millage Rates *Calculations Sub./Condo 100 - ACREAGE HEADER School Other Total Use Code 0 - VACANT RESIDENTIAL 5.122 5.8384 10.9604 Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) Date Book-Page Amount 08/13/10 4596-980 01/13/06 3965-505 11/01/70 375-947 2017 Certified Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Land Value ( +)Improved Value ( =)Market Value ( =)Assessed Value ( =)School Taxable Value ( =)Taxable Value If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after theFinal Tax Roll Page 1 of 1 12/18/2017http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/RecordDetail.html?sid=1020880270&ccpaver=1710181149... Collier County Property AppraiserProperty Aerial Parcel No.00149840008 Site Adr. Open GIS in a New Window with More Features. Page 1 of 1 12/18/2017http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/RecordDetail.html?sid=1020880270&ccpaver=1710181149... $ 800,000 $ 525,000 $ 0 $ 1,300 $ 100 $ 0 $ 100 $ 100 $ 100 $ 100 Collier County Property AppraiserProperty Summary Parcel No.00150400000 Site Adr. Name / Address MARLAC LLC 25397 N NORTHBRIDGE RD City HAWTHORN WOODS State IL Zip 60047-7359 Map No.Strap No.Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 3A13 000100 043 3A13 13 48 25 2.5 Legal 13 48 25 NW1/4 OF SE1/4 OF NW1/4 OF NE1/4 2.5 AC OR 837 PG 26 Millage Area 150 Millage Rates *Calculations Sub./Condo 100 - ACREAGE HEADER School Other Total Use Code 0 - VACANT RESIDENTIAL 5.122 5.8384 10.9604 Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) Date Book-Page Amount 08/13/10 4596-980 01/19/06 3968-942 10/17/79 837-26 01/01/68 254-98 2017 Certified Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Land Value ( +)Improved Value ( =)Market Value ( =)Assessed Value ( =)School Taxable Value ( =)Taxable Value If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after theFinal Tax Roll Page 1 of 1 12/18/2017http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/RecordDetail.html?sid=1020880270&ccpaver=1710181149... Collier County Property AppraiserProperty Aerial Parcel No.00150400000 Site Adr. Open GIS in a New Window with More Features. Page 1 of 1 12/18/2017http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/RecordDetail.html?sid=1020880270&ccpaver=1710181149... $ 800,000 $ 525,000 $ 18,800 $ 0 $ 0 $ 100 $ 0 $ 100 $ 100 $ 100 $ 100 Collier County Property AppraiserProperty Summary Parcel No.00150440002 Site Adr. Name / Address MARLAC LLC 25397 N NORTHBRIDGE RD City HAWTHORN WOODS State IL Zip 60047-7359 Map No.Strap No.Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 3A13 000100 044 3A13 13 48 25 2.5 Legal 13 48 25 SE1/4 OF SW1/4 OF NW1/4 OF NE1/4 2.5 AC OR 1324 PG 929 Millage Area 150 Millage Rates *Calculations Sub./Condo 100 - ACREAGE HEADER School Other Total Use Code 0 - VACANT RESIDENTIAL 5.122 5.8384 10.9604 Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) Date Book-Page Amount 08/13/10 4596-980 01/19/06 3968-940 02/03/00 2637-1226 01/17/88 1324-929 01/01/68 254-100 2017 Certified Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Land Value ( +)Improved Value ( =)Market Value ( =)Assessed Value ( =)School Taxable Value ( =)Taxable Value If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after theFinal Tax Roll Page 1 of 1 12/18/2017http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/RecordDetail.html?sid=1020880270&ccpaver=1710181149... Collier County Property AppraiserProperty Aerial Parcel No.00150440002 Site Adr. Open GIS in a New Window with More Features. Page 1 of 1 12/18/2017http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/RecordDetail.html?sid=1020880270&ccpaver=1710181149... $ 800,000 $ 525,000 $ 18,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 100 $ 0 $ 100 $ 100 $ 100 $ 100 Collier County Property AppraiserProperty Summary Parcel No.00149080004 Site Adr. Name / Address MARLAC LLC 25397 N NORTHBRIDGE RD City HAWTHORN WOODS State IL Zip 60047-7359 Map No.Strap No.Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 3A13 000100 010 3A13 13 48 25 2.5 Legal 13 48 25 SW1/4 OF SE1/4 OF NW1/4 OF NE1/4 2.5 AC OR 1768 PG 1688 Millage Area 150 Millage Rates *Calculations Sub./Condo 100 - ACREAGE HEADER School Other Total Use Code 0 - VACANT RESIDENTIAL 5.122 5.8384 10.9604 Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) Date Book-Page Amount 08/13/10 4596-980 01/19/06 3968-939 09/09/04 3639-854 11/17/92 1768-1688 07/01/92 1736-210 02/01/89 1415-679 2017 Certified Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Land Value ( +)Improved Value ( =)Market Value ( =)Assessed Value ( =)School Taxable Value ( =)Taxable Value If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after theFinal Tax Roll Page 1 of 1 12/18/2017http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/RecordDetail.html?sid=1020880270&ccpaver=1710181149... Collier County Property AppraiserProperty Aerial Parcel No.00149080004 Site Adr. Open GIS in a New Window with More Features. Page 1 of 1 12/18/2017http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/RecordDetail.html?sid=1020880270&ccpaver=1710181149... $ 800,000 $ 440,000 $ 250,000 $ 0 $ 500 $ 0 $ 500 $ 500 $ 500 $ 500 Collier County Property AppraiserProperty Summary Parcel No.00150600004 Site Adr. Name / Address MARLAC LLC 25397 N NORTHBRIDGE RD City HAWTHORN WOODS State IL Zip 60047-7359 Map No.Strap No.Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 3A13 000100 048 3A13 13 48 25 2.5 Legal 13 48 25 NE1/4 OF NW1/4 OF SW1/4 OF NE1/4 2.5 AC OR 297 PG 86 Millage Area 150 Millage Rates *Calculations Sub./Condo 100 - ACREAGE HEADER School Other Total Use Code 0 - VACANT RESIDENTIAL 5.122 5.8384 10.9604 Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) Date Book-Page Amount 08/13/10 4596-980 04/21/08 4351-3494 11/18/05 3932-2401 01/17/69 297-86 2017 Certified Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Land Value ( +)Improved Value ( =)Market Value ( =)Assessed Value ( =)School Taxable Value ( =)Taxable Value If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after theFinal Tax Roll Page 1 of 1 12/18/2017http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/RecordDetail.html?sid=1020880270&ccpaver=1710181149... Collier County Property AppraiserProperty Aerial Parcel No.00150600004 Site Adr. Open GIS in a New Window with More Features. Page 1 of 1 12/18/2017http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/RecordDetail.html?sid=1020880270&ccpaver=1710181149... $ 0 $ 360,000 $ 400,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 2,500 $ 500 $ 0 $ 500 $ 500 $ 500 $ 500 Collier County Property AppraiserProperty Summary Parcel No.00148200005 Site Adr. Name / Address LIVVET LLC 25397 N NORTHBRIDGE RD City HAWTHORN WOODS State IL Zip 60047-7359 Map No.Strap No.Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 3A13 000100 001 33A13 13 48 25 2.5 Legal 13 48 25 NW1/4 OF NE1/4 OF SW1/4 OF NE1/4 2.5 AC OR 800 PG 1362 Millage Area 150 Millage Rates *Calculations Sub./Condo 100 - ACREAGE HEADER School Other Total Use Code 0 - VACANT RESIDENTIAL 5.122 5.8384 10.9604 Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) Date Book-Page Amount 11/26/12 4865-2180 04/21/08 4351-3612 04/03/06 4009-1178 12/14/05 3947-3958 03/21/79 800-1362 05/01/76 648-1967 2017 Certified Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Land Value ( +)Improved Value ( =)Market Value ( =)Assessed Value ( =)School Taxable Value ( =)Taxable Value If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after theFinal Tax Roll Page 1 of 1 12/18/2017http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/RecordDetail.html?sid=1020880270&ccpaver=1710181149... Collier County Property AppraiserProperty Aerial Parcel No.00148200005 Site Adr. Open GIS in a New Window with More Features. Page 1 of 1 12/18/2017http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/RecordDetail.html?sid=1020880270&ccpaver=1710181149... 2004. Collier County Property Appraiser. While the Collier County Property Appraiser is committed to providing the most accurate and up-to-date information, no warranties expressed or implied are provided for the data herein, its use, or its interpretation. Page 1 of 1Print Map 12/15/2017http://maps.collierappraiser.com/mapprint.aspx?pagetitle=&orient=LANDSCAPE&paper... Folio Number: 00149200004 Name: MARC L CATALANO REV TRUST Street# & Name: Build# / Unit#: 013 / Legal Description: 13 48 25 NE1/4 OF NW1/4 OF NW1/4 OF NE1/4 LESS W 30FT 2004. Collier County Property Appraiser. While the Collier County Property Appraiser is committed to providing the most accurate and up-to-date information, no warranties expressed or implied are provided for the data herein, its use, or its interpretation. Page 1 of 1Print Map 12/15/2017http://maps.collierappraiser.com/mapprint.aspx?pagetitle=&orient=LANDSCAPE&paper... Folio Number: 00150280000 Name: RICHARD ALAN SOMMERVILLE TRUST Street# & Name: Build# / Unit#: 040 / Legal Description: 13 48 25 NW1/4 OF NE1/4 OF NW1/4 OF NE1/4 2.5 AC OR 1496 PG 625 2004. Collier County Property Appraiser. While the Collier County Property Appraiser is committed to providing the most accurate and up-to-date information, no warranties expressed or implied are provided for the data herein, its use, or its interpretation. Page 1 of 1Print Map 12/15/2017http://maps.collierappraiser.com/mapprint.aspx?pagetitle=&orient=LANDSCAPE&paper... Folio Number: 00150160007 Name: MARC L CATALANO REV INTE TRUST Street# & Name: Build# / Unit#: 037 / Legal Description: 13 48 25 SE1/4 OF NW1/4 OF NW1/4 OF NE1/4 2.5 AC OR 1510 PG 2233 2004. Collier County Property Appraiser. While the Collier County Property Appraiser is committed to providing the most accurate and up-to-date information, no warranties expressed or implied are provided for the data herein, its use, or its interpretation. Page 1 of 1Print Map 12/15/2017http://maps.collierappraiser.com/mapprint.aspx?pagetitle=&orient=LANDSCAPE&paper... Folio Number: 00150560005 Name: MARC L CATALANO REV INTE TRUST Street# & Name: Build# / Unit#: 047 / Legal Description: 13 48 25 SW1/4 OF NE1/4 OF NW1/4 OF NE1/4 2.5 AC OR 814 PG 1813 2004. Collier County Property Appraiser. While the Collier County Property Appraiser is committed to providing the most accurate and up-to-date information, no warranties expressed or implied are provided for the data herein, its use, or its interpretation. Page 1 of 1Print Map 12/15/2017http://maps.collierappraiser.com/mapprint.aspx?pagetitle=&orient=LANDSCAPE&paper... Folio Number: 00148280009 Name: PARRISH, DOREEN L Street# & Name: Build# / Unit#: 001 / 5 Legal Description: 13 48 25 SE1/4 OF NE1/4 OF NW1/4 OF NE1/4 + SW1/4 OF NW1/4 OF NE1/4 OF NE1/4 5 AC OR 249 PG 583 2004. Collier County Property Appraiser. While the Collier County Property Appraiser is committed to providing the most accurate and up-to-date information, no warranties expressed or implied are provided for the data herein, its use, or its interpretation. Page 1 of 1Print Map 12/15/2017http://maps.collierappraiser.com/mapprint.aspx?pagetitle=&orient=LANDSCAPE&paper... Folio Number: 00150520003 Name: MARLAC LLC Street# & Name: Build# / Unit#: 046 / Legal Description: 13 48 25 W1/2 OF SW1/4 OF NW1/4 OF NE1/4 5 AC OR 752 PG 1030 2004. Collier County Property Appraiser. While the Collier County Property Appraiser is committed to providing the most accurate and up-to-date information, no warranties expressed or implied are provided for the data herein, its use, or its interpretation. Page 1 of 1Print Map 12/15/2017http://maps.collierappraiser.com/mapprint.aspx?pagetitle=&orient=LANDSCAPE&paper... Folio Number: 00149840008 Name: MARLAC LLC Street# & Name: Build# / Unit#: 029 / Legal Description: 13 48 25 NE1/4 OF SW1/4 OF NW1/4 OF NE1/4 2.5 AC 2004. Collier County Property Appraiser. While the Collier County Property Appraiser is committed to providing the most accurate and up-to-date information, no warranties expressed or implied are provided for the data herein, its use, or its interpretation. Page 1 of 1Print Map 12/15/2017http://maps.collierappraiser.com/mapprint.aspx?pagetitle=&orient=LANDSCAPE&paper... Folio Number: 00150400000 Name: MARLAC LLC Street# & Name: Build# / Unit#: 043 / Legal Description: 13 48 25 NW1/4 OF SE1/4 OF NW1/4 OF NE1/4 2.5 AC OR 837 PG 26 2004. Collier County Property Appraiser. While the Collier County Property Appraiser is committed to providing the most accurate and up-to-date information, no warranties expressed or implied are provided for the data herein, its use, or its interpretation. Page 1 of 1Print Map 12/15/2017http://maps.collierappraiser.com/mapprint.aspx?pagetitle=&orient=LANDSCAPE&paper... Folio Number: 00150440002 Name: MARLAC LLC Street# & Name: Build# / Unit#: 044 / Legal Description: 13 48 25 SE1/4 OF SW1/4 OF NW1/4 OF NE1/4 2.5 AC OR 1324 PG 929 2004. Collier County Property Appraiser. While the Collier County Property Appraiser is committed to providing the most accurate and up-to-date information, no warranties expressed or implied are provided for the data herein, its use, or its interpretation. Page 1 of 1Print Map 12/15/2017http://maps.collierappraiser.com/mapprint.aspx?pagetitle=&orient=LANDSCAPE&paper... Folio Number: 00149080004 Name: MARLAC LLC Street# & Name: Build# / Unit#: 010 / Legal Description: 13 48 25 SW1/4 OF SE1/4 OF NW1/4 OF NE1/4 2.5 AC OR 1768 PG 1688 2004. Collier County Property Appraiser. While the Collier County Property Appraiser is committed to providing the most accurate and up-to-date information, no warranties expressed or implied are provided for the data herein, its use, or its interpretation. Page 1 of 1Print Map 12/15/2017http://maps.collierappraiser.com/mapprint.aspx?pagetitle=&orient=LANDSCAPE&paper... Folio Number: 00150600004 Name: MARLAC LLC Street# & Name: Build# / Unit#: 048 / Legal Description: 13 48 25 NE1/4 OF NW1/4 OF SW1/4 OF NE1/4 2.5 AC OR 297 PG 86 2004. Collier County Property Appraiser. While the Collier County Property Appraiser is committed to providing the most accurate and up-to-date information, no warranties expressed or implied are provided for the data herein, its use, or its interpretation. Page 1 of 1Print Map 12/15/2017http://maps.collierappraiser.com/mapprint.aspx?pagetitle=&orient=LANDSCAPE&paper... Folio Number: 00148200005 Name: LIVVET LLC Street# & Name: Build# / Unit#: 001 / 3 Legal Description: 13 48 25 NW1/4 OF NE1/4 OF SW1/4 OF NE1/4 2.5 AC OR 800 PG 1362 2004. Collier County Property Appraiser. While the Collier County Property Appraiser is committed to providing the most accurate and up-to-date information, no warranties expressed or implied are provided for the data herein, its use, or its interpretation. Page 1 of 1Print Map 12/15/2017http://maps.collierappraiser.com/mapprint.aspx?pagetitle=&orient=LANDSCAPE&paper... APPENDIX D ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES REPORT AND FDEP FILE REVIEW DATA FORM-LBD-DVV ®kcehCoeG htiw tropeR ™paM suidaR RDE ehT 6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor Shelton, CT 06484 Toll Free: 800.352.0050 www.edrnet.com Livingston Assemblage Livingston Road and Veterans Memorial Blvd. Naples, FL 34110 Inquiry Number: 5140197.2s December 18, 2017 SECTION PAGE Executive Summary ES1 Overview Map 2 Detail Map 3 Map Findings Summary 4 Map Findings 8 Orphan Summary 12 Government Records Searched/Data Currency Tracking GR-1 GEOCHECK ADDENDUM Physical Setting Source Addendum A-1 Physical Setting Source Summary A-2 Physical Setting SSURGO Soil Map A-5 Physical Setting Source Map A-12 Physical Setting Source Map Findings A-14 Physical Setting Source Records Searched PSGR-1 TC5140197.2s Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050 with any questions or comments. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2017 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5140197.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc (EDR). The report was designed to assist parties seeking to meet the search requirements of EPA’s Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments (E 1527-13), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments for Forestland or Rural Property (E 2247-16), the ASTM Standard Practice for Limited Environmental Due Diligence: Transaction Screen Process (E 1528-14) or custom requirements developed for the evaluation of environmental risk associated with a parcel of real estate. TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION ADDRESS LIVINGSTON ROAD AND VETERANS MEMORIAL BLVD. NAPLES, FL 34110 COORDINATES 26.2999400 - 26˚ 17’ 59.78’’Latitude (North): 81.7600600 - 81˚ 45’ 36.21’’Longitude (West): Zone 17Universal Tranverse Mercator: 424126.4UTM X (Meters): 2908960.0UTM Y (Meters): 11 ft. above sea levelElevation: USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY 5652584 BONITA SPRINGS, FLTarget Property Map: 2012Version Date: 5652664 CORKSCREW SW, FLEast Map: 2012Version Date: AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY IN THIS REPORT 20150426Portions of Photo from: USDASource: 5140197.2s Page 2 2 REGENCY FARM-COUNTYL STATE HWY 858 AST Lower 1213, 0.230, ENE 1 NORTH COLLIER FIRE C 16280 LIVINGSTON RD AST Higher 346, 0.066, NW MAPPED SITES SUMMARY Target Property Address: LIVINGSTON ROAD AND VETERANS MEMORIAL BLVD. NAPLES, FL 34110 Click on Map ID to see full detail. MAP RELATIVE DIST (ft. & mi.) ID DATABASE ACRONYMS ELEVATION DIRECTIONSITE NAME ADDRESS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5140197.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS The target property was not listed in any of the databases searched by EDR. DATABASES WITH NO MAPPED SITES No mapped sites were found in EDR’s search of available ("reasonably ascertainable ") government records either on the target property or within the search radius around the target property for the following databases: STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal NPL site list NPL National Priority List Proposed NPL Proposed National Priority List Sites NPL LIENS Federal Superfund Liens Federal Delisted NPL site list Delisted NPL National Priority List Deletions Federal CERCLIS list FEDERAL FACILITY Federal Facility Site Information listing SEMS Superfund Enterprise Management System Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list SEMS-ARCHIVE Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list CORRACTS Corrective Action Report Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list RCRA-TSDF RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal Federal RCRA generators list RCRA-LQG RCRA - Large Quantity Generators RCRA-SQG RCRA - Small Quantity Generators RCRA-CESQG RCRA - Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries LUCIS Land Use Control Information System US ENG CONTROLS Engineering Controls Sites List EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5140197.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 US INST CONTROL Sites with Institutional Controls Federal ERNS list ERNS Emergency Response Notification System State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS SHWS Florida’s State-Funded Action Sites State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists SWF/LF Solid Waste Facility Database State and tribal leaking storage tank lists LUST Petroleum Contamination Detail Report LAST Leaking Aboveground Storage Tank Listing INDIAN LUST Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land State and tribal registered storage tank lists FF TANKS Federal Facilities Listing FEMA UST Underground Storage Tank Listing UST Storage Tank Facility Information INDIAN UST Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land TANKS Storage Tank Facility List State and tribal institutional control / engineering control registries ENG CONTROLS Institutional Controls Registry INST CONTROL Institutional Controls Registry State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites VCP Voluntary Cleanup Sites INDIAN VCP Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing State and tribal Brownfields sites BROWNFIELDS Brownfields Sites Database ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists US BROWNFIELDS A Listing of Brownfields Sites Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites SWRCY Recycling Centers INDIAN ODI Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands ODI Open Dump Inventory DEBRIS REGION 9 Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5140197.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 IHS OPEN DUMPS Open Dumps on Indian Land Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites US HIST CDL Delisted National Clandestine Laboratory Register PRIORITYCLEANERS Priority Ranking List Fl Sites Sites List US CDL National Clandestine Laboratory Register Local Land Records LIENS 2 CERCLA Lien Information Records of Emergency Release Reports HMIRS Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System SPILLS Oil and Hazardous Materials Incidents SPILLS 90 SPILLS 90 data from FirstSearch SPILLS 80 SPILLS 80 data from FirstSearch Other Ascertainable Records RCRA NonGen / NLR RCRA - Non Generators / No Longer Regulated FUDS Formerly Used Defense Sites DOD Department of Defense Sites SCRD DRYCLEANERS State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing US FIN ASSUR Financial Assurance Information EPA WATCH LIST EPA WATCH LIST 2020 COR ACTION 2020 Corrective Action Program List TSCA Toxic Substances Control Act TRIS Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System SSTS Section 7 Tracking Systems ROD Records Of Decision RMP Risk Management Plans RAATS RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System PRP Potentially Responsible Parties PADS PCB Activity Database System ICIS Integrated Compliance Information System FTTS FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) MLTS Material Licensing Tracking System COAL ASH DOE Steam-Electric Plant Operation Data COAL ASH EPA Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List PCB TRANSFORMER PCB Transformer Registration Database RADINFO Radiation Information Database HIST FTTS FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing DOT OPS Incident and Accident Data CONSENT Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees INDIAN RESERV Indian Reservations FUSRAP Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program UMTRA Uranium Mill Tailings Sites LEAD SMELTERS Lead Smelter Sites US AIRS Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem US MINES Mines Master Index File ABANDONED MINES Abandoned Mines EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5140197.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 FINDS Facility Index System/Facility Registry System UXO Unexploded Ordnance Sites DOCKET HWC Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing ECHO Enforcement & Compliance History Information FUELS PROGRAM EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing AIRS Permitted Facilities Listing ASBESTOS ASBESTOS CLEANUP SITES DEP Cleanup Sites - Contamination Locator Map Listing DEDB Ethylene Dibromide Database Results DRYCLEANERS Drycleaning Facilities DWM CONTAM DWM CONTAMINATED SITES Financial Assurance Financial Assurance Information Listing FL Cattle Dip. Vats Cattle Dipping Vats RESP PARTY Responsible Party Sites Listing SITE INV SITES Site Investigation Section Sites Listing TIER 2 Tier 2 Facility Listing UIC Underground Injection Wells Database Listing NPDES Wastewater Facility Regulation Database EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records EDR MGP EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants EDR Hist Auto EDR Exclusive Historical Auto Stations EDR Hist Cleaner EDR Exclusive Historical Cleaners EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives RGA HWS Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste Facilities List RGA LF Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List RGA LUST Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank SURROUNDING SITES: SEARCH RESULTS Surrounding sites were identified in the following databases. Elevations have been determined from the USGS Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity should be field verified. Sites with an elevation equal to or higher than the target property have been differentiated below from sites with an elevation lower than the target property. Page numbers and map identification numbers refer to the EDR Radius Map report where detailed data on individual sites can be reviewed. Sites listed in bold italics are in multiple databases. Unmappable (orphan) sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5140197.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7 STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS State and tribal registered storage tank lists AST: Shortly after the Sept 11 event, the DEP was instructed to remove the detail about some of the storage tank facilities in the state from their reports. Federal-owned facilities and bulk storage facilities are included in that set. A review of the AST list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there are 2 AST sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ NORTH COLLIER FIRE C 16280 LIVINGSTON RD NW 0 - 1/8 (0.066 mi.) 1 8 Database: AST, Date of Government Version: 10/04/2017 Facility-Site Id: 9814442 Facility Status: OPEN Facility Status: OPEN PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ REGENCY FARM-COUNTYL STATE HWY 858 ENE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.230 mi.) 2 9 Database: AST, Date of Government Version: 10/04/2017 Facility-Site Id: 8944125 Facility Status: OPEN Facility Status: OPEN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5140197.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 8 Due to poor or inadequate address information, the following sites were not mapped. Count: 1 records. Site Name Database(s)____________ ____________ LIVINGSTON ROAD AND GOLDEN GATE PA RGA LF EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc. EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc. MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search TargetDistance Total Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal NPL site list 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000NPL 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000Proposed NPL 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001NPL LIENS Federal Delisted NPL site list 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000Delisted NPL Federal CERCLIS list 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500FEDERAL FACILITY 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SEMS Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SEMS-ARCHIVE Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000CORRACTS Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500RCRA-TSDF Federal RCRA generators list 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250RCRA-LQG 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250RCRA-SQG 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250RCRA-CESQG Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500LUCIS 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US ENG CONTROLS 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US INST CONTROL Federal ERNS list 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001ERNS State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000SHWS State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SWF/LF State and tribal leaking storage tank lists 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500LUST 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500LAST 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN LUST State and tribal registered storage tank lists 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250FF TANKS TC5140197.2s Page 4 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search TargetDistance Total Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250FEMA UST 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250UST 2 NR NR NR 1 1 0.250AST 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250INDIAN UST 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250TANKS State and tribal institutional control / engineering control registries 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500ENG CONTROLS 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INST CONTROL State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500VCP 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN VCP State and tribal Brownfields sites 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500BROWNFIELDS ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US BROWNFIELDS Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SWRCY 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN ODI 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500ODI 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500DEBRIS REGION 9 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500IHS OPEN DUMPS Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001US HIST CDL 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500PRIORITYCLEANERS 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000Fl Sites 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001US CDL Local Land Records 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001LIENS 2 Records of Emergency Release Reports 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001HMIRS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001SPILLS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001SPILLS 90 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001SPILLS 80 Other Ascertainable Records 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250RCRA NonGen / NLR 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000FUDS TC5140197.2s Page 5 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search TargetDistance Total Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000DOD 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SCRD DRYCLEANERS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001US FIN ASSUR 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001EPA WATCH LIST 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.2502020 COR ACTION 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001TSCA 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001TRIS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001SSTS 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000ROD 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001RMP 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001RAATS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001PRP 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001PADS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001ICIS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001FTTS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001MLTS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001COAL ASH DOE 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500COAL ASH EPA 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001PCB TRANSFORMER 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001RADINFO 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001HIST FTTS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001DOT OPS 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000CONSENT 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001INDIAN RESERV 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000FUSRAP 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500UMTRA 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001LEAD SMELTERS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001US AIRS 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250US MINES 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001ABANDONED MINES 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001FINDS 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000UXO 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001DOCKET HWC 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001ECHO 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250FUELS PROGRAM 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001AIRS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPASBESTOS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001CLEANUP SITES 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250DEDB 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250DRYCLEANERS 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500DWM CONTAM 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001Financial Assurance 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250FL Cattle Dip. Vats 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500RESP PARTY 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SITE INV SITES 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001TIER 2 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001UIC 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001NPDES EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000EDR MGP TC5140197.2s Page 6 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search TargetDistance Total Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.125EDR Hist Auto 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.125EDR Hist Cleaner EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001RGA HWS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001RGA LF 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001RGA LUST 2 0 0 0 1 1 0- Totals -- NOTES: TP = Target Property NR = Not Requested at this Search Distance Sites may be listed in more than one database TC5140197.2s Page 7 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Double wall - tank jacketConstruction Description: Secondary ContainmentConstruction Category: 1Tank Id: Level gauges/alarmsConstruction Description: Overfill/SpillConstruction Category: 1Tank Id: Flow shut-OffConstruction Description: Overfill/SpillConstruction Category: 1Tank Id: Spill containment bucketConstruction Description: Overfill/SpillConstruction Category: 1Tank Id: CompartmentedConstruction Description: Miscellaneous AttributesConstruction Category: 1Tank Id: SteelConstruction Description: Primary ConstructionConstruction Category: 1Tank Id: Construction: ABOVEGROUNDTank Location: 1500Gallons: Vehicular DieselContent Description: Vehicular dieselSubstance: 01-JAN-2015Install Date: 01-JAN-2015Status Date: In serviceStatus: 1Tank Id: (239) 552-1303Owner Phone: DALE WOHLERS | CELL: 239-438-0112Owner Contact: NAPLES, FL 34109Owner City,St,Zip: ATTN: STORAGE TANK REGISOwner Address 2: 6495 TAYLOR RDOwner Address: NORTH COLLIER FIRE CTRL & RESCUE DISTOwner Name: 71447Owner Id: Owner: Not reportedLat/Long (dms): Not reportedPositioning Method: STATERegion: PDEP Contractor Own: (239) 552-1303Facility Phone: Fuel user/Non-retailType Description: OPENFacility Status: 9814442Facility ID: AST: 346 ft. 0.066 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 11 ft. < 1/8 NAPLES, FL 34110 NW 16280 LIVINGSTON RD N/A 1 ASTNORTH COLLIER FIRE CTRL & RESC DIST ST#48 A100408123 TC5140197.2s Page 8 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Click here for Florida Oculus: Abv, no soil contactPiping Description: Miscellaneous AttributesPiping Category: 1Tank ID: Suction piping systemPiping Description: Miscellaneous AttributesPiping Category: 1Tank ID: Piping: Suction pump check valveMonitoring Description: 1Tank ID: Monitor tank bottom spaceMonitoring Description: 1Tank ID: Visual inspection of ASTsMonitoring Description: 1Tank ID: Monitor dbl wall tank spaceMonitoring Description: 1Tank ID: Monitoring: NORTH COLLIER FIRE CTRL & RESC DIST ST#48 (Continued) A100408123 Fuel Oil - Onsite HeatContent Description: Fuel oil-on site heatSubstance: 01-AUG-1986Install Date: Not reportedStatus Date: In serviceStatus: 1Tank Id: (813) 597-7154Owner Phone: GLORIA MARTINOwner Contact: NAPLES, FL 33963Owner City,St,Zip: Not reportedOwner Address 2: 1230 IMMOKALEE RDOwner Address: REGENCY REALTY ASSOCIATES INCOwner Name: 18036Owner Id: Owner: 26 18 5 / 81 45 12Lat/Long (dms): UNVRPositioning Method: STATERegion: PDEP Contractor Own: (813) 657-4892Facility Phone: AgriculturalType Description: OPENFacility Status: 8944125Facility ID: AST: 1213 ft. 0.230 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 10 ft. 1/8-1/4 IMMOKALEE, FL 33934 ENE STATE HWY 858 N/A 2 ASTREGENCY FARM-COUNTYLINE FARM A100130680 TC5140197.2s Page 9 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation ABOVEGROUNDTank Location: 550Gallons: Fuel Oil - Onsite HeatContent Description: Fuel oil-on site heatSubstance: 01-AUG-1986Install Date: Not reportedStatus Date: In serviceStatus: 7Tank Id: ABOVEGROUNDTank Location: 550Gallons: Fuel Oil - Onsite HeatContent Description: Fuel oil-on site heatSubstance: 01-AUG-1986Install Date: Not reportedStatus Date: In serviceStatus: 6Tank Id: ABOVEGROUNDTank Location: 550Gallons: Fuel Oil - Onsite HeatContent Description: Fuel oil-on site heatSubstance: 01-AUG-1986Install Date: Not reportedStatus Date: In serviceStatus: 5Tank Id: ABOVEGROUNDTank Location: 550Gallons: Fuel Oil - Onsite HeatContent Description: Fuel oil-on site heatSubstance: 01-AUG-1986Install Date: Not reportedStatus Date: In serviceStatus: 4Tank Id: ABOVEGROUNDTank Location: 550Gallons: Fuel Oil - Onsite HeatContent Description: Fuel oil-on site heatSubstance: 01-AUG-1986Install Date: Not reportedStatus Date: In serviceStatus: 3Tank Id: ABOVEGROUNDTank Location: 550Gallons: Fuel Oil - Onsite HeatContent Description: Fuel oil-on site heatSubstance: 01-AUG-1986Install Date: Not reportedStatus Date: In serviceStatus: 2Tank Id: ABOVEGROUNDTank Location: 550Gallons: REGENCY FARM-COUNTYLINE FARM (Continued) A100130680 TC5140197.2s Page 10 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Click here for Florida Oculus: REGENCY FARM-COUNTYLINE FARM (Continued) A100130680 TC5140197.2s Page 11 ORPHAN SUMMARYCityEDR IDSite NameSite AddressZipDatabase(s)Count: 1 records.NAPLES S115155632LIVINGSTON ROAD AND GOLDEN GATE PALIVINGSTON ROAD AND GOLDEN GAT RGA LFTC5140197.2s Page 12 To maintain currency of the following federal and state databases, EDR contacts the appropriate governmental agency on a monthly or quarterly basis, as required. Number of Days to Update:Provides confirmation that EDR is reporting records that have been updated within 90 days from the date the government agency made the information available to the public. STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal NPL site list NPL: National Priority List National Priorities List (Superfund). The NPL is a subset of CERCLIS and identifies over 1,200 sites for priority cleanup under the Superfund Program. NPL sites may encompass relatively large areas. As such, EDR provides polygon coverage for over 1,000 NPL site boundaries produced by EPA’s Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC) and regional EPA offices. Date of Government Version: 10/10/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/03/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/15/2017 Number of Days to Update: 42 Source: EPA Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 11/03/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/15/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly NPL Site Boundaries Sources: EPA’s Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC) Telephone: 202-564-7333 EPA Region 1 EPA Region 6 Telephone 617-918-1143 Telephone: 214-655-6659 EPA Region 3 EPA Region 7 Telephone 215-814-5418 Telephone: 913-551-7247 EPA Region 4 EPA Region 8 Telephone 404-562-8033 Telephone: 303-312-6774 EPA Region 5 EPA Region 9 Telephone 312-886-6686 Telephone: 415-947-4246 EPA Region 10 Telephone 206-553-8665 Proposed NPL: Proposed National Priority List Sites A site that has been proposed for listing on the National Priorities List through the issuance of a proposed rule in the Federal Register. EPA then accepts public comments on the site, responds to the comments, and places on the NPL those sites that continue to meet the requirements for listing. Date of Government Version: 10/10/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/03/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/15/2017 Number of Days to Update: 42 Source: EPA Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 11/03/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/15/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly NPL LIENS: Federal Superfund Liens Federal Superfund Liens. Under the authority granted the USEPA by CERCLA of 1980, the USEPA has the authority to file liens against real property in order to recover remedial action expenditures or when the property owner received notification of potential liability. USEPA compiles a listing of filed notices of Superfund Liens. Date of Government Version: 10/15/1991 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/02/1994 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/30/1994 Number of Days to Update: 56 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-4267 Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned TC5140197.2s Page GR-1 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Federal Delisted NPL site list Delisted NPL: National Priority List Deletions The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP) establishes the criteria that the EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425.(e), sites may be deleted from the NPL where no further response is appropriate. Date of Government Version: 10/10/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/03/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/15/2017 Number of Days to Update: 42 Source: EPA Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 11/03/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/15/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal CERCLIS list FEDERAL FACILITY: Federal Facility Site Information listing A listing of National Priority List (NPL) and Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) sites found in the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) Database where EPA Federal Facilities Restoration and Reuse Office is involved in cleanup activities. Date of Government Version: 11/07/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/05/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/07/2017 Number of Days to Update: 92 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-8704 Last EDR Contact: 10/06/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/15/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies SEMS: Superfund Enterprise Management System SEMS (Superfund Enterprise Management System) tracks hazardous waste sites, potentially hazardous waste sites, and remedial activities performed in support of EPA’s Superfund Program across the United States. The list was formerly know as CERCLIS, renamed to SEMS by the EPA in 2015. The list contains data on potentially hazardous waste sites that have been reported to the USEPA by states, municipalities, private companies and private persons, pursuant to Section 103 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). This dataset also contains sites which are either proposed to or on the National Priorities List (NPL) and the sites which are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL. Date of Government Version: 07/11/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/21/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/06/2017 Number of Days to Update: 77 Source: EPA Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 11/03/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/29/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list SEMS-ARCHIVE: Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive TC5140197.2s Page GR-2 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING SEMS-ARCHIVE (Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive) tracks sites that have no further interest under the Federal Superfund Program based on available information. The list was formerly known as the CERCLIS-NFRAP, renamed to SEMS ARCHIVE by the EPA in 2015. EPA may perform a minimal level of assessment work at a site while it is archived if site conditions change and/or new information becomes available. Archived sites have been removed and archived from the inventory of SEMS sites. Archived status indicates that, to the best of EPA’s knowledge, assessment at a site has been completed and that EPA has determined no further steps will be taken to list the site on the National Priorities List (NPL), unless information indicates this decision was not appropriate or other considerations require a recommendation for listing at a later time. The decision does not necessarily mean that there is no hazard associated with a given site; it only means that. based upon available information, the location is not judged to be potential NPL site. Date of Government Version: 07/11/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/28/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/06/2017 Number of Days to Update: 70 Source: EPA Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 11/03/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/29/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list CORRACTS: Corrective Action Report CORRACTS identifies hazardous waste handlers with RCRA corrective action activity. Date of Government Version: 09/13/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/26/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/06/2017 Number of Days to Update: 10 Source: EPA Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 09/26/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/08/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list RCRA-TSDF: RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Transporters are individuals or entities that move hazardous waste from the generator offsite to a facility that can recycle, treat, store, or dispose of the waste. TSDFs treat, store, or dispose of the waste. Date of Government Version: 09/13/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/26/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/06/2017 Number of Days to Update: 10 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (404) 562-8651 Last EDR Contact: 09/26/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/08/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal RCRA generators list RCRA-LQG: RCRA - Large Quantity Generators RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Large quantity generators (LQGs) generate over 1,000 kilograms (kg) of hazardous waste, or over 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version: 09/13/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/26/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/06/2017 Number of Days to Update: 10 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (404) 562-8651 Last EDR Contact: 09/26/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/08/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC5140197.2s Page GR-3 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING RCRA-SQG: RCRA - Small Quantity Generators RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Small quantity generators (SQGs) generate between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version: 09/13/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/26/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/06/2017 Number of Days to Update: 10 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (404) 562-8651 Last EDR Contact: 09/26/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/08/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly RCRA-CESQG: RCRA - Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Conditionally exempt small quantity generators (CESQGs) generate less than 100 kg of hazardous waste, or less than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version: 09/13/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/26/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/06/2017 Number of Days to Update: 10 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (404) 562-8651 Last EDR Contact: 09/26/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/08/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries LUCIS: Land Use Control Information System LUCIS contains records of land use control information pertaining to the former Navy Base Realignment and Closure properties. Date of Government Version: 05/22/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/13/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/15/2017 Number of Days to Update: 94 Source: Department of the Navy Telephone: 843-820-7326 Last EDR Contact: 11/08/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/26/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies US ENG CONTROLS: Engineering Controls Sites List A listing of sites with engineering controls in place. Engineering controls include various forms of caps, building foundations, liners, and treatment methods to create pathway elimination for regulated substances to enter environmental media or effect human health. Date of Government Version: 08/10/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/30/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/13/2017 Number of Days to Update: 44 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-0695 Last EDR Contact: 11/27/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/12/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies US INST CONTROL: Sites with Institutional Controls A listing of sites with institutional controls in place. Institutional controls include administrative measures, such as groundwater use restrictions, construction restrictions, property use restrictions, and post remediation care requirements intended to prevent exposure to contaminants remaining on site. Deed restrictions are generally required as part of the institutional controls. Date of Government Version: 08/10/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/30/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/13/2017 Number of Days to Update: 44 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-0695 Last EDR Contact: 11/27/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/12/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC5140197.2s Page GR-4 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Federal ERNS list ERNS: Emergency Response Notification System Emergency Response Notification System. ERNS records and stores information on reported releases of oil and hazardous substances. Date of Government Version: 09/18/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/21/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/13/2017 Number of Days to Update: 22 Source: National Response Center, United States Coast Guard Telephone: 202-267-2180 Last EDR Contact: 09/21/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/08/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS SHWS: Florida’s State-Funded Action Sites State Hazardous Waste Sites. State hazardous waste site records are the states’ equivalent to CERCLIS. These sites may or may not already be listed on the federal CERCLIS list. Priority sites planned for cleanup using state funds (state equivalent of Superfund) are identified along with sites where cleanup will be paid for by potentially responsible parties. Available information varies by state. Date of Government Version: 08/10/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/22/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/21/2017 Number of Days to Update: 30 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-488-0190 Last EDR Contact: 11/22/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/05/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists SWF/LF: Solid Waste Facility Database Solid Waste Facilities/Landfill Sites. SWF/LF type records typically contain an inventory of solid waste disposal facilities or landfills in a particular state. Depending on the state, these may be active or inactive facilities or open dumps that failed to meet RCRA Subtitle D Section 4004 criteria for solid waste landfills or disposal sites. Date of Government Version: 10/16/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/17/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/27/2017 Number of Days to Update: 41 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-922-7121 Last EDR Contact: 10/17/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/29/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly State and tribal leaking storage tank lists LAST: Leaking Aboveground Storage Tank Listing The file for Leaking Aboveground Storage Tanks. Please remember STCM does not track the source of the discharge so the agency provides a list of facilities with an aboveground tank and an open discharge split by facilities with aboveground tanks only and facilities with aboveground and underground tanks. Date of Government Version: 11/02/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/03/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/27/2017 Number of Days to Update: 24 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-245-8799 Last EDR Contact: 10/25/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/12/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies LUST: Petroleum Contamination Detail Report Leaking Underground Storage Tank Incident Reports. LUST records contain an inventory of reported leaking underground storage tank incidents. Not all states maintain these records, and the information stored varies by state. Date of Government Version: 10/04/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/31/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/27/2017 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-245-8839 Last EDR Contact: 10/31/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/12/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC5140197.2s Page GR-5 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING INDIAN LUST R1: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land A listing of leaking underground storage tank locations on Indian Land. Date of Government Version: 04/14/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/27/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/06/2017 Number of Days to Update: 71 Source: EPA Region 1 Telephone: 617-918-1313 Last EDR Contact: 10/27/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/05/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R10: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Alaska, Idaho, Oregon and Washington. Date of Government Version: 04/25/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/07/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/08/2017 Number of Days to Update: 31 Source: EPA Region 10 Telephone: 206-553-2857 Last EDR Contact: 11/07/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/05/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R9: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Arizona, California, New Mexico and Nevada Date of Government Version: 04/13/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/27/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/13/2017 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 415-972-3372 Last EDR Contact: 10/27/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/05/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R7: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Iowa, Kansas, and Nebraska Date of Government Version: 04/14/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/27/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/06/2017 Number of Days to Update: 71 Source: EPA Region 7 Telephone: 913-551-7003 Last EDR Contact: 10/27/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/05/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R6: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in New Mexico and Oklahoma. Date of Government Version: 04/24/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/27/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/06/2017 Number of Days to Update: 71 Source: EPA Region 6 Telephone: 214-665-6597 Last EDR Contact: 10/27/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/05/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R4: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Florida, Mississippi and North Carolina. Date of Government Version: 10/14/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/27/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/05/2017 Number of Days to Update: 98 Source: EPA Region 4 Telephone: 404-562-8677 Last EDR Contact: 10/27/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/05/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually INDIAN LUST R8: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah and Wyoming. Date of Government Version: 05/01/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/27/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/13/2017 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: EPA Region 8 Telephone: 303-312-6271 Last EDR Contact: 10/27/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/05/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC5140197.2s Page GR-6 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING INDIAN LUST R5: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land Leaking underground storage tanks located on Indian Land in Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin. Date of Government Version: 04/26/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/27/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/13/2017 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: EPA, Region 5 Telephone: 312-886-7439 Last EDR Contact: 10/27/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/05/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies State and tribal registered storage tank lists FEMA UST: Underground Storage Tank Listing A listing of all FEMA owned underground storage tanks. Date of Government Version: 05/15/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/30/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/13/2017 Number of Days to Update: 136 Source: FEMA Telephone: 202-646-5797 Last EDR Contact: 10/13/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/22/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies FF TANKS: Federal Facilities Listing A listing of federal facilities with storage tanks. Date of Government Version: 10/03/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/05/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/27/2017 Number of Days to Update: 53 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-245-8250 Last EDR Contact: 09/25/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/08/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly UST: Storage Tank Facility Information Registered Underground Storage Tanks. UST’s are regulated under Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and must be registered with the state department responsible for administering the UST program. Available information varies by state program. Date of Government Version: 10/04/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/31/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/21/2017 Number of Days to Update: 21 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-245-8839 Last EDR Contact: 10/31/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/12/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly AST: Storage Tank Facility Information Registered Aboveground Storage Tanks. Date of Government Version: 10/04/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/31/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/21/2017 Number of Days to Update: 21 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-245-8839 Last EDR Contact: 10/31/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/12/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN UST R10: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 10 (Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, Washington, and Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 04/25/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/27/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/13/2017 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: EPA Region 10 Telephone: 206-553-2857 Last EDR Contact: 10/27/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/05/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC5140197.2s Page GR-7 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING INDIAN UST R1: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 1 (Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont and ten Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 04/14/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/27/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/06/2017 Number of Days to Update: 71 Source: EPA, Region 1 Telephone: 617-918-1313 Last EDR Contact: 10/27/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/05/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R4: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 4 (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee and Tribal Nations) Date of Government Version: 10/14/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/27/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/05/2017 Number of Days to Update: 98 Source: EPA Region 4 Telephone: 404-562-9424 Last EDR Contact: 10/27/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/05/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually INDIAN UST R5: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 5 (Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin and Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 04/26/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/27/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/06/2017 Number of Days to Update: 71 Source: EPA Region 5 Telephone: 312-886-6136 Last EDR Contact: 10/27/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/05/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R6: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 6 (Louisiana, Arkansas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Texas and 65 Tribes). Date of Government Version: 04/24/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/27/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/08/2017 Number of Days to Update: 134 Source: EPA Region 6 Telephone: 214-665-7591 Last EDR Contact: 10/27/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/05/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R9: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 9 (Arizona, California, Hawaii, Nevada, the Pacific Islands, and Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 04/13/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/27/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/13/2017 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: EPA Region 9 Telephone: 415-972-3368 Last EDR Contact: 10/27/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/05/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R8: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 8 (Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, Wyoming and 27 Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 05/01/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/27/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/13/2017 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: EPA Region 8 Telephone: 303-312-6137 Last EDR Contact: 10/27/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/05/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC5140197.2s Page GR-8 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING INDIAN UST R7: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 7 (Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, and 9 Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 05/02/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/27/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/06/2017 Number of Days to Update: 71 Source: EPA Region 7 Telephone: 913-551-7003 Last EDR Contact: 10/27/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/05/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies TANKS: Storage Tank Facility List This listing includes storage tank facilities that do not have tank information. The tanks have either be closed or removed from the site, but the facilities were still registered at some point in history. Date of Government Version: 10/04/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/31/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/21/2017 Number of Days to Update: 21 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-245-8841 Last EDR Contact: 10/31/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/12/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly State and tribal institutional control / engineering control registries ENG CONTROLS: Institutional Controls Registry The registry is a database of all contaminated sites in the state of Florida which are subject to engineering controls. Engineering Controls encompass a variety of engineered remedies to contain and/or reduce contamination, and/or physical barriers intended to limit access to property. ECs include fences, signs, guards, landfill caps, provision of potable water, slurry walls, sheet pile (vertical caps), pumping and treatment of groundwater, monitoring wells, and vapor extraction systems. Date of Government Version: 10/02/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/03/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/27/2017 Number of Days to Update: 55 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-245-8927 Last EDR Contact: 10/03/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/15/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Inst Control: Institutional Controls Registry The registry is a database of all contaminated sites in the state of Florida which are subject to institutional and engineering controls. Date of Government Version: 10/02/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/03/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/27/2017 Number of Days to Update: 55 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-245-8927 Last EDR Contact: 10/03/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/15/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites INDIAN VCP R1: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 1. Date of Government Version: 07/27/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/29/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2016 Number of Days to Update: 142 Source: EPA, Region 1 Telephone: 617-918-1102 Last EDR Contact: 09/25/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/08/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN VCP R7: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Lisitng A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 7. TC5140197.2s Page GR-9 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 03/20/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/22/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/19/2008 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: EPA, Region 7 Telephone: 913-551-7365 Last EDR Contact: 04/20/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/20/2009 Data Release Frequency: Varies VCP: Voluntary Cleanup Sites Listing of closed and active voluntary cleanup sites. Date of Government Version: 08/22/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/23/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/23/2017 Number of Days to Update: 61 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-245-8705 Last EDR Contact: 11/14/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/05/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies State and tribal Brownfields sites BROWNFIELDS: Brownfields Sites Database Brownfields are defined by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) as abandoned, idled, or underused industrial and commercial facilities where expansion or redevelopment is complicated by real or perceived environmental contamination. Date of Government Version: 09/19/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/03/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/21/2017 Number of Days to Update: 49 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-245-8927 Last EDR Contact: 10/03/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/15/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually BROWNFIELDS AREAS: Brownfields Areas Database A "brownfield area" means a contiguous area of one or more brownfield sites, some of which may not be contaminated, that has been designated as such by a local government resolution. Such areas may include all or portions of community redevelopment areas, enterprise zones, empowerment zones, other such designated economically deprived communities and areas, and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) designated brownfield pilot projects. This layer provides a polygon representation of the boundaries of these designated Brownfield Areas in Florida. Date of Government Version: 08/23/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/03/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/21/2017 Number of Days to Update: 49 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-245-8934 Last EDR Contact: 10/03/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/15/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly BSRA: Brownfield Site Rehabilitation Agreements Listing The BSRA provides DEP and the public assurance that site rehabilitation will be conducted in accordance with Florida Statutes and DEP’s Contaminated Site Cleanup Criteria rule. In addition, the BSRA provides limited liability protection for the voluntary responsible party. The BSRA contains various commitments by the voluntary responsible party, including milestones for completion of site rehabilitation tasks and submittal of technical reports and plans. It also contains a commitment by DEP to review technical reports according to an agreed upon schedule. Only those brownfield sites with an executed BSRA are eligible to apply for a voluntary cleanup tax credit incentive pursuant to Section 376.30781, Florida Statutes. Date of Government Version: 08/02/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/03/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/21/2017 Number of Days to Update: 49 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-245-8934 Last EDR Contact: 10/03/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/15/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists TC5140197.2s Page GR-10 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING US BROWNFIELDS: A Listing of Brownfields Sites Brownfields are real property, the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant. Cleaning up and reinvesting in these properties takes development pressures off of undeveloped, open land, and both improves and protects the environment. Assessment, Cleanup and Redevelopment Exchange System (ACRES) stores information reported by EPA Brownfields grant recipients on brownfields properties assessed or cleaned up with grant funding as well as information on Targeted Brownfields Assessments performed by EPA Regions. A listing of ACRES Brownfield sites is obtained from Cleanups in My Community. Cleanups in My Community provides information on Brownfields properties for which information is reported back to EPA, as well as areas served by Brownfields grant programs. Date of Government Version: 08/21/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/20/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/08/2017 Number of Days to Update: 79 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-566-2777 Last EDR Contact: 09/20/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/01/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites SWRCY: Recycling Centers A listing of recycling centers located in the state of Florida. Date of Government Version: 07/24/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/22/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/12/2015 Number of Days to Update: 82 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-245-8718 Last EDR Contact: 10/20/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/29/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN ODI: Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands Location of open dumps on Indian land. Date of Government Version: 12/31/1998 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/03/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/24/2008 Number of Days to Update: 52 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-308-8245 Last EDR Contact: 10/30/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/12/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies ODI: Open Dump Inventory An open dump is defined as a disposal facility that does not comply with one or more of the Part 257 or Part 258 Subtitle D Criteria. Date of Government Version: 06/30/1985 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/09/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/17/2004 Number of Days to Update: 39 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 06/09/2004 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned DEBRIS REGION 9: Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations A listing of illegal dump sites location on the Torres Martinez Indian Reservation located in eastern Riverside County and northern Imperial County, California. Date of Government Version: 01/12/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/07/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/21/2009 Number of Days to Update: 137 Source: EPA, Region 9 Telephone: 415-947-4219 Last EDR Contact: 10/20/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/05/2018 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned IHS OPEN DUMPS: Open Dumps on Indian Land A listing of all open dumps located on Indian Land in the United States. TC5140197.2s Page GR-11 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 04/01/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/06/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/29/2015 Number of Days to Update: 176 Source: Department of Health & Human Serivces, Indian Health Service Telephone: 301-443-1452 Last EDR Contact: 11/03/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/12/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites US HIST CDL: National Clandestine Laboratory Register A listing of clandestine drug lab locations that have been removed from the DEAs National Clandestine Laboratory Register. Date of Government Version: 07/13/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/06/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/06/2017 Number of Days to Update: 30 Source: Drug Enforcement Administration Telephone: 202-307-1000 Last EDR Contact: 11/28/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/12/2018 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned PRIORITYCLEANERS: Priority Ranking List The Florida Legislature has established a state-funded program to cleanup properties that are contaminated as a result of the operations of a drycleaning facility. Date of Government Version: 07/10/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/17/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/23/2017 Number of Days to Update: 67 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-245-8927 Last EDR Contact: 11/17/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/26/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies FL SITES: Sites List This summary status report was developed from a number of lists including the Eckhardt list, the Moffit list, the EPA Hazardous Waste Sites list, EPA’s Emergency & Remedial Response information System list (RCRA Section 3012) & existing department lists such as the obsolete uncontrolled Hazardous Waste Sites list. This list is no longer updated. Date of Government Version: 12/31/1989 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/09/1994 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/04/1994 Number of Days to Update: 87 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-245-8705 Last EDR Contact: 03/24/1994 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned US CDL: Clandestine Drug Labs A listing of clandestine drug lab locations. The U.S. Department of Justice ("the Department") provides this web site as a public service. It contains addresses of some locations where law enforcement agencies reported they found chemicals or other items that indicated the presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites. In most cases, the source of the entries is not the Department, and the Department has not verified the entry and does not guarantee its accuracy. Members of the public must verify the accuracy of all entries by, for example, contacting local law enforcement and local health departments. Date of Government Version: 07/13/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/06/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/06/2017 Number of Days to Update: 30 Source: Drug Enforcement Administration Telephone: 202-307-1000 Last EDR Contact: 11/28/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/12/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Local Land Records LIENS 2: CERCLA Lien Information A Federal CERCLA (’Superfund’) lien can exist by operation of law at any site or property at which EPA has spent Superfund monies. These monies are spent to investigate and address releases and threatened releases of contamination. CERCLIS provides information as to the identity of these sites and properties. TC5140197.2s Page GR-12 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 07/11/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/26/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/13/2017 Number of Days to Update: 79 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-6023 Last EDR Contact: 11/03/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/05/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Records of Emergency Release Reports HMIRS: Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System Hazardous Materials Incident Report System. HMIRS contains hazardous material spill incidents reported to DOT. Date of Government Version: 09/21/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/21/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/13/2017 Number of Days to Update: 22 Source: U.S. Department of Transportation Telephone: 202-366-4555 Last EDR Contact: 09/21/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/08/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SPILLS: Oil and Hazardous Materials Incidents Statewide oil and hazardous materials inland incidents. Date of Government Version: 10/10/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/12/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/27/2017 Number of Days to Update: 46 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-245-2010 Last EDR Contact: 10/10/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/22/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually SPILLS 90: SPILLS90 data from FirstSearch Spills 90 includes those spill and release records available exclusively from FirstSearch databases. Typically, they may include chemical, oil and/or hazardous substance spills recorded after 1990. Duplicate records that are already included in EDR incident and release records are not included in Spills 90. Date of Government Version: 12/10/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/03/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/04/2013 Number of Days to Update: 60 Source: FirstSearch Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 01/03/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SPILLS 80: SPILLS80 data from FirstSearch Spills 80 includes those spill and release records available from FirstSearch databases prior to 1990. Typically, they may include chemical, oil and/or hazardous substance spills recorded before 1990. Duplicate records that are already included in EDR incident and release records are not included in Spills 80. Date of Government Version: 09/01/2001 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/03/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/06/2013 Number of Days to Update: 62 Source: FirstSearch Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 01/03/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned Other Ascertainable Records RCRA NonGen / NLR: RCRA - Non Generators / No Longer Regulated RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous waste. Date of Government Version: 09/13/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/26/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/06/2017 Number of Days to Update: 10 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (404) 562-8651 Last EDR Contact: 09/26/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/08/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC5140197.2s Page GR-13 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING FUDS: Formerly Used Defense Sites The listing includes locations of Formerly Used Defense Sites properties where the US Army Corps of Engineers is actively working or will take necessary cleanup actions. Date of Government Version: 01/31/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/08/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/13/2015 Number of Days to Update: 97 Source: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Telephone: 202-528-4285 Last EDR Contact: 11/22/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/05/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies DOD: Department of Defense Sites This data set consists of federally owned or administered lands, administered by the Department of Defense, that have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres of the United States, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/10/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007 Number of Days to Update: 62 Source: USGS Telephone: 888-275-8747 Last EDR Contact: 10/13/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/22/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually FEDLAND: Federal and Indian Lands Federally and Indian administrated lands of the United States. Lands included are administrated by: Army Corps of Engineers, Bureau of Reclamation, National Wild and Scenic River, National Wildlife Refuge, Public Domain Land, Wilderness, Wilderness Study Area, Wildlife Management Area, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Bureau of Land Management, Department of Justice, Forest Service, Fish and Wildlife Service, National Park Service. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/06/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007 Number of Days to Update: 339 Source: U.S. Geological Survey Telephone: 888-275-8747 Last EDR Contact: 10/11/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/22/2018 Data Release Frequency: N/A SCRD DRYCLEANERS: State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing The State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners was established in 1998, with support from the U.S. EPA Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation. It is comprised of representatives of states with established drycleaner remediation programs. Currently the member states are Alabama, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, North Carolina, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Wisconsin. Date of Government Version: 01/01/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/03/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/07/2017 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 615-532-8599 Last EDR Contact: 11/17/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/26/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies US FIN ASSUR: Financial Assurance Information All owners and operators of facilities that treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste are required to provide proof that they will have sufficient funds to pay for the clean up, closure, and post-closure care of their facilities. Date of Government Version: 10/17/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/01/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/08/2017 Number of Days to Update: 37 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-566-1917 Last EDR Contact: 11/01/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/08/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly EPA WATCH LIST: EPA WATCH LIST EPA maintains a "Watch List" to facilitate dialogue between EPA, state and local environmental agencies on enforcement matters relating to facilities with alleged violations identified as either significant or high priority. Being on the Watch List does not mean that the facility has actually violated the law only that an investigation by EPA or a state or local environmental agency has led those organizations to allege that an unproven violation has in fact occurred. Being on the Watch List does not represent a higher level of concern regarding the alleged violations that were detected, but instead indicates cases requiring additional dialogue between EPA, state and local agencies - primarily because of the length of time the alleged violation has gone unaddressed or unresolved. TC5140197.2s Page GR-14 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 08/30/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/21/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/17/2014 Number of Days to Update: 88 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 617-520-3000 Last EDR Contact: 11/06/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/19/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly 2020 COR ACTION: 2020 Corrective Action Program List The EPA has set ambitious goals for the RCRA Corrective Action program by creating the 2020 Corrective Action Universe. This RCRA cleanup baseline includes facilities expected to need corrective action. The 2020 universe contains a wide variety of sites. Some properties are heavily contaminated while others were contaminated but have since been cleaned up. Still others have not been fully investigated yet, and may require little or no remediation. Inclusion in the 2020 Universe does not necessarily imply failure on the part of a facility to meet its RCRA obligations. Date of Government Version: 04/22/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/03/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/09/2015 Number of Days to Update: 6 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-308-4044 Last EDR Contact: 11/09/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/19/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies TSCA: Toxic Substances Control Act Toxic Substances Control Act. TSCA identifies manufacturers and importers of chemical substances included on the TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory list. It includes data on the production volume of these substances by plant site. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/15/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/29/2015 Number of Days to Update: 14 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-260-5521 Last EDR Contact: 09/22/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/01/2018 Data Release Frequency: Every 4 Years TRIS: Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System Toxic Release Inventory System. TRIS identifies facilities which release toxic chemicals to the air, water and land in reportable quantities under SARA Title III Section 313. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/24/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/05/2016 Number of Days to Update: 133 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-0250 Last EDR Contact: 11/20/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/05/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually SSTS: Section 7 Tracking Systems Section 7 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act, as amended (92 Stat. 829) requires all registered pesticide-producing establishments to submit a report to the Environmental Protection Agency by March 1st each year. Each establishment must report the types and amounts of pesticides, active ingredients and devices being produced, and those having been produced and sold or distributed in the past year. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/10/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/25/2011 Number of Days to Update: 77 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-4203 Last EDR Contact: 10/27/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/05/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually ROD: Records Of Decision Record of Decision. ROD documents mandate a permanent remedy at an NPL (Superfund) site containing technical and health information to aid in the cleanup. Date of Government Version: 09/27/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/12/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/20/2017 Number of Days to Update: 8 Source: EPA Telephone: 703-416-0223 Last EDR Contact: 12/08/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/19/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually TC5140197.2s Page GR-15 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING RMP: Risk Management Plans When Congress passed the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, it required EPA to publish regulations and guidance for chemical accident prevention at facilities using extremely hazardous substances. The Risk Management Program Rule (RMP Rule) was written to implement Section 112(r) of these amendments. The rule, which built upon existing industry codes and standards, requires companies of all sizes that use certain flammable and toxic substances to develop a Risk Management Program, which includes a(n): Hazard assessment that details the potential effects of an accidental release, an accident history of the last five years, and an evaluation of worst-case and alternative accidental releases; Prevention program that includes safety precautions and maintenance, monitoring, and employee training measures; and Emergency response program that spells out emergency health care, employee training measures and procedures for informing the public and response agencies (e.g the fire department) should an accident occur. Date of Government Version: 11/02/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/17/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/08/2017 Number of Days to Update: 21 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-8600 Last EDR Contact: 10/23/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/05/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies RAATS: RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System RCRA Administration Action Tracking System. RAATS contains records based on enforcement actions issued under RCRA pertaining to major violators and includes administrative and civil actions brought by the EPA. For administration actions after September 30, 1995, data entry in the RAATS database was discontinued. EPA will retain a copy of the database for historical records. It was necessary to terminate RAATS because a decrease in agency resources made it impossible to continue to update the information contained in the database. Date of Government Version: 04/17/1995 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/03/1995 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/07/1995 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-4104 Last EDR Contact: 06/02/2008 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/01/2008 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned PRP: Potentially Responsible Parties A listing of verified Potentially Responsible Parties Date of Government Version: 10/25/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/17/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/20/2014 Number of Days to Update: 3 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-6023 Last EDR Contact: 11/03/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/19/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly PADS: PCB Activity Database System PCB Activity Database. PADS Identifies generators, transporters, commercial storers and/or brokers and disposers of PCB’s who are required to notify the EPA of such activities. Date of Government Version: 06/01/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/09/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/13/2017 Number of Days to Update: 126 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-0500 Last EDR Contact: 10/13/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/22/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually ICIS: Integrated Compliance Information System The Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS) supports the information needs of the national enforcement and compliance program as well as the unique needs of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program. Date of Government Version: 11/18/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/23/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2017 Number of Days to Update: 79 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-2501 Last EDR Contact: 10/11/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/22/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC5140197.2s Page GR-16 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING FTTS: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) FTTS tracks administrative cases and pesticide enforcement actions and compliance activities related to FIFRA, TSCA and EPCRA (Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act). To maintain currency, EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis. Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009 Number of Days to Update: 25 Source: EPA/Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances Telephone: 202-566-1667 Last EDR Contact: 08/18/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FTTS INSP: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) A listing of FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) inspections and enforcements. Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009 Number of Days to Update: 25 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-1667 Last EDR Contact: 08/18/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly MLTS: Material Licensing Tracking System MLTS is maintained by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and contains a list of approximately 8,100 sites which possess or use radioactive materials and which are subject to NRC licensing requirements. To maintain currency, EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis. Date of Government Version: 08/30/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/08/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/21/2016 Number of Days to Update: 43 Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commission Telephone: 301-415-7169 Last EDR Contact: 10/16/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/20/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly COAL ASH DOE: Steam-Electric Plant Operation Data A listing of power plants that store ash in surface ponds. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/07/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/22/2009 Number of Days to Update: 76 Source: Department of Energy Telephone: 202-586-8719 Last EDR Contact: 12/05/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/19/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies COAL ASH EPA: Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List A listing of coal combustion residues surface impoundments with high hazard potential ratings. Date of Government Version: 07/01/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/10/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/20/2014 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 12/08/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/19/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies PCB TRANSFORMER: PCB Transformer Registration Database The database of PCB transformer registrations that includes all PCB registration submittals. Date of Government Version: 05/24/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/30/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/15/2017 Number of Days to Update: 15 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-566-0517 Last EDR Contact: 10/26/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/05/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies RADINFO: Radiation Information Database The Radiation Information Database (RADINFO) contains information about facilities that are regulated by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations for radiation and radioactivity. TC5140197.2s Page GR-17 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 10/02/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/05/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/13/2017 Number of Days to Update: 8 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-343-9775 Last EDR Contact: 10/05/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/15/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly HIST FTTS: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing A complete administrative case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA regions. The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation of FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some EPA regions are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing EPA Headquarters with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that may not be included in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated. Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-2501 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2007 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned HIST FTTS INSP: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Inspection & Enforcement Case Listing A complete inspection and enforcement case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA regions. The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation of FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some EPA regions are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing EPA Headquarters with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that may not be included in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated. Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-2501 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2008 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned DOT OPS: Incident and Accident Data Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety Incident and Accident data. Date of Government Version: 07/31/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/07/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/18/2012 Number of Days to Update: 42 Source: Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety Telephone: 202-366-4595 Last EDR Contact: 10/31/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/12/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies CONSENT: Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees Major legal settlements that establish responsibility and standards for cleanup at NPL (Superfund) sites. Released periodically by United States District Courts after settlement by parties to litigation matters. Date of Government Version: 06/30/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/03/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/20/2017 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: Department of Justice, Consent Decree Library Telephone: Varies Last EDR Contact: 09/25/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/08/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies BRS: Biennial Reporting System The Biennial Reporting System is a national system administered by the EPA that collects data on the generation and management of hazardous waste. BRS captures detailed data from two groups: Large Quantity Generators (LQG) and Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/22/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/28/2017 Number of Days to Update: 218 Source: EPA/NTIS Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 11/20/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/05/2018 Data Release Frequency: Biennially TC5140197.2s Page GR-18 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING INDIAN RESERV: Indian Reservations This map layer portrays Indian administered lands of the United States that have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/14/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2017 Number of Days to Update: 546 Source: USGS Telephone: 202-208-3710 Last EDR Contact: 10/11/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/22/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually FUSRAP: Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program DOE established the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) in 1974 to remediate sites where radioactive contamination remained from Manhattan Project and early U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) operations. Date of Government Version: 12/23/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/27/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/17/2017 Number of Days to Update: 52 Source: Department of Energy Telephone: 202-586-3559 Last EDR Contact: 11/02/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/19/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies UMTRA: Uranium Mill Tailings Sites Uranium ore was mined by private companies for federal government use in national defense programs. When the mills shut down, large piles of the sand-like material (mill tailings) remain after uranium has been extracted from the ore. Levels of human exposure to radioactive materials from the piles are low; however, in some cases tailings were used as construction materials before the potential health hazards of the tailings were recognized. Date of Government Version: 06/23/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/11/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/03/2017 Number of Days to Update: 23 Source: Department of Energy Telephone: 505-845-0011 Last EDR Contact: 11/22/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/05/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies LEAD SMELTER 1: Lead Smelter Sites A listing of former lead smelter site locations. Date of Government Version: 10/10/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/03/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/15/2017 Number of Days to Update: 42 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-8787 Last EDR Contact: 11/03/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/15/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies LEAD SMELTER 2: Lead Smelter Sites A list of several hundred sites in the U.S. where secondary lead smelting was done from 1931and 1964. These sites may pose a threat to public health through ingestion or inhalation of contaminated soil or dust Date of Government Version: 04/05/2001 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/27/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/02/2010 Number of Days to Update: 36 Source: American Journal of Public Health Telephone: 703-305-6451 Last EDR Contact: 12/02/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned US AIRS (AFS): Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem (AFS) The database is a sub-system of Aerometric Information Retrieval System (AIRS). AFS contains compliance data on air pollution point sources regulated by the U.S. EPA and/or state and local air regulatory agencies. This information comes from source reports by various stationary sources of air pollution, such as electric power plants, steel mills, factories, and universities, and provides information about the air pollutants they produce. Action, air program, air program pollutant, and general level plant data. It is used to track emissions and compliance data from industrial plants. TC5140197.2s Page GR-19 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 10/12/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/03/2017 Number of Days to Update: 100 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-2496 Last EDR Contact: 09/26/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/08/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually US AIRS MINOR: Air Facility System Data A listing of minor source facilities. Date of Government Version: 10/12/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/03/2017 Number of Days to Update: 100 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-2496 Last EDR Contact: 09/26/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/08/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually US MINES: Mines Master Index File Contains all mine identification numbers issued for mines active or opened since 1971. The data also includes violation information. Date of Government Version: 07/31/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/30/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/13/2017 Number of Days to Update: 44 Source: Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration Telephone: 303-231-5959 Last EDR Contact: 11/28/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/12/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually US MINES 2: Ferrous and Nonferrous Metal Mines Database Listing This map layer includes ferrous (ferrous metal mines are facilities that extract ferrous metals, such as iron ore or molybdenum) and nonferrous (Nonferrous metal mines are facilities that extract nonferrous metals, such as gold, silver, copper, zinc, and lead) metal mines in the United States. Date of Government Version: 12/05/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/29/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/18/2008 Number of Days to Update: 49 Source: USGS Telephone: 703-648-7709 Last EDR Contact: 12/01/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/12/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies US MINES 3: Active Mines & Mineral Plants Database Listing Active Mines and Mineral Processing Plant operations for commodities monitored by the Minerals Information Team of the USGS. Date of Government Version: 04/14/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/08/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/13/2011 Number of Days to Update: 97 Source: USGS Telephone: 703-648-7709 Last EDR Contact: 12/01/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/12/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies ABANDONED MINES: Abandoned Mines An inventory of land and water impacted by past mining (primarily coal mining) is maintained by OSMRE to provide information needed to implement the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA). The inventory contains information on the location, type, and extent of AML impacts, as well as, information on the cost associated with the reclamation of those problems. The inventory is based upon field surveys by State, Tribal, and OSMRE program officials. It is dynamic to the extent that it is modified as new problems are identified and existing problems are reclaimed. Date of Government Version: 09/25/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/26/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/20/2017 Number of Days to Update: 24 Source: Department of Interior Telephone: 202-208-2609 Last EDR Contact: 12/06/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/26/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC5140197.2s Page GR-20 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING FINDS: Facility Index System/Facility Registry System Facility Index System. FINDS contains both facility information and ’pointers’ to other sources that contain more detail. EDR includes the following FINDS databases in this report: PCS (Permit Compliance System), AIRS (Aerometric Information Retrieval System), DOCKET (Enforcement Docket used to manage and track information on civil judicial enforcement cases for all environmental statutes), FURS (Federal Underground Injection Control), C-DOCKET (Criminal Docket System used to track criminal enforcement actions for all environmental statutes), FFIS (Federal Facilities Information System), STATE (State Environmental Laws and Statutes), and PADS (PCB Activity Data System). Date of Government Version: 07/23/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/06/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/15/2017 Number of Days to Update: 9 Source: EPA Telephone: (404) 562-9900 Last EDR Contact: 12/05/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/19/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly ECHO: Enforcement & Compliance History Information ECHO provides integrated compliance and enforcement information for about 800,000 regulated facilities nationwide. Date of Government Version: 09/02/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/06/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/20/2017 Number of Days to Update: 44 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-2280 Last EDR Contact: 12/05/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/19/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly DOCKET HWC: Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing A complete list of the Federal Agency Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Facilities. Date of Government Version: 02/13/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/15/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/03/2017 Number of Days to Update: 261 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-0527 Last EDR Contact: 11/21/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/12/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies UXO: Unexploded Ordnance Sites A listing of unexploded ordnance site locations Date of Government Version: 10/25/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/02/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/13/2017 Number of Days to Update: 133 Source: Department of Defense Telephone: 703-704-1564 Last EDR Contact: 10/16/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/29/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies FUELS PROGRAM: EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing This listing includes facilities that are registered under the Part 80 (Code of Federal Regulations) EPA Fuels Programs. All companies now are required to submit new and updated registrations. Date of Government Version: 08/17/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/17/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/15/2017 Number of Days to Update: 29 Source: EPA Telephone: 800-385-6164 Last EDR Contact: 11/20/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/05/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly AIRS: Permitted Facilities Listing A listing of Air Resources Management permits. Date of Government Version: 09/25/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/26/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/06/2017 Number of Days to Update: 71 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-921-9558 Last EDR Contact: 10/25/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/12/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC5140197.2s Page GR-21 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING ASBESTOS: Asbestos Notification Listing Asbestos sites Date of Government Version: 10/23/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/24/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/21/2017 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-717-9086 Last EDR Contact: 11/14/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/05/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies CLEANUP SITES: DEP Cleanup Sites - Contamination Locator Map Listing This listing includes the locations of waste cleanup sites from various programs. The source of the cleanup site data includes Hazardous Waste programs, Site Investigation Section, Compliance and Enforcement Tracking, Drycleaning State Funded Cleanup Program (possibly other state funded cleanup), Storage Tank Contamination Monitoring. Date of Government Version: 08/28/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/30/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/02/2017 Number of Days to Update: 64 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 866-282-0787 Last EDR Contact: 11/27/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/12/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly DEDB: Ethylene Dibromide Database Results Ethylene dibromide (EDB), a soil fumigant, that has been detected in drinking water wells. The amount found exceeds the maximum contaminant level as stated in Chapter 62-550 or 520. It is a potential threat to public health when present in drinking water. Date of Government Version: 09/27/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/28/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/21/2017 Number of Days to Update: 54 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-245-8335 Last EDR Contact: 12/13/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/02/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies DRYCLEANERS: Drycleaning Facilities The Drycleaners database, maintained by the Department of Environmental Protection, provides information about permitted dry cleaner facilities. Date of Government Version: 10/03/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/24/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/21/2017 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-245-8927 Last EDR Contact: 10/24/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/05/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually DWM CONTAM: DWM CONTAMINATED SITES A listing of active or known sites. The listing includes sites that need cleanup but are not actively being working on because the agency currently does not have funding (primarily petroleum and drycleaning). Date of Government Version: 04/01/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/16/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/01/2017 Number of Days to Update: 77 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-245-7503 Last EDR Contact: 10/23/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/22/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies Financial Assurance 1: Financial Assurance Information Listing A list of hazardous waste facilities required to provide financial assurance under RCRA. Date of Government Version: 10/26/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/27/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/27/2017 Number of Days to Update: 31 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-245-8793 Last EDR Contact: 10/25/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/12/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually TC5140197.2s Page GR-22 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Financial Assurance 2: Financial Assurance Information Listing A listing of financial assurance information for solid waste facilities. Date of Government Version: 07/27/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/31/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/20/2017 Number of Days to Update: 81 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-245-8743 Last EDR Contact: 11/21/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/12/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Financial Assurance 3: Financial Assurance Information Listing A listing of financial assurance information for storage tanks sites. Date of Government Version: 10/04/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/31/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/27/2017 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-245-8853 Last EDR Contact: 10/31/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/12/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FL Cattle Dip. Vats: Cattle Dipping Vats From the 1910’s through the 1950’s, these vats were filled with an arsenic solution for the control and eradication of the cattle fever tick. Other pesticides, such as DDT, were also widely used. By State law, all cattle, horses, mules, goats, and other susceptible animals were required to be dipped every 14 days. Under certain circumstances, the arsenic and other pesticides remaining at the site may present an environmental or public health hazard. Date of Government Version: 02/04/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/29/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/11/2007 Number of Days to Update: 12 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-245-4444 Last EDR Contact: 10/03/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/22/2018 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned RESP PARTY: Responsible Party Sites Listing Open, inactive and closed responsible party sites Date of Government Version: 10/02/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/03/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/27/2017 Number of Days to Update: 55 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-245-8758 Last EDR Contact: 10/03/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/15/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SITE INV SITES: Site Investigation Section Sites Listing Statewide coverage of Site Investigation Section (SIS) sites. Site Investigation is a Section within the Bureau of Waste Cleanup, Division of Waste Management. SIS provides technical support to FDEP District Waste Cleanup Programs and conducts contamination assessments throughout the state. Date of Government Version: 08/21/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/22/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/23/2017 Number of Days to Update: 62 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-245-8953 Last EDR Contact: 11/20/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/05/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TIER 2: Tier 2 Facility Listing A listing of facilities which store or manufacture hazardous materials that submit a chemical inventory report. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/23/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/02/2017 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-413-9970 Last EDR Contact: 12/08/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/26/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC5140197.2s Page GR-23 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING UIC: Underground Injection Wells Database Listing A listing of Class I wells. Class I wells are used to inject hazardous waste, nonhazardous waste, or municipal waste below the lowermost USDW. Date of Government Version: 10/31/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/01/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/28/2017 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-245-8655 Last EDR Contact: 10/27/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/05/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies WASTEWATER: Wastewater Facility Regulation Database Domestic and industrial wastewater facilities. Date of Government Version: 11/01/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/07/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/28/2017 Number of Days to Update: 21 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-245-8600 Last EDR Contact: 11/07/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/19/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records EDR MGP: EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants The EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plant Database includes records of coal gas plants (manufactured gas plants) compiled by EDR’s researchers. Manufactured gas sites were used in the United States from the 1800’s to 1950’s to produce a gas that could be distributed and used as fuel. These plants used whale oil, rosin, coal, or a mixture of coal, oil, and water that also produced a significant amount of waste. Many of the byproducts of the gas production, such as coal tar (oily waste containing volatile and non-volatile chemicals), sludges, oils and other compounds are potentially hazardous to human health and the environment. The byproduct from this process was frequently disposed of directly at the plant site and can remain or spread slowly, serving as a continuous source of soil and groundwater contamination. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Number of Days to Update: N/A Source: EDR, Inc. Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned EDR Hist Auto: EDR Exclusive Historical Auto Stations EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential gas station/filling station/service station sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR’s review was limited to those categories of sources that might, in EDR’s opinion, include gas station/filling station/service station establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to gas, gas station, gasoline station, filling station, auto, automobile repair, auto service station, service station, etc. This database falls within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR’s HRHR effort presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Number of Days to Update: N/A Source: EDR, Inc. Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies EDR Hist Cleaner: EDR Exclusive Historical Cleaners EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential dry cleaner sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR’s review was limited to those categories of sources that might, in EDR’s opinion, include dry cleaning establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to dry cleaners, cleaners, laundry, laundromat, cleaning/laundry, wash & dry etc. This database falls within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR’s HRHR effort presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches. TC5140197.2s Page GR-24 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Number of Days to Update: N/A Source: EDR, Inc. Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives RGA HWS: Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste Facilities List The EDR Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste database provides a list of SHWS incidents derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled from Records formerly available from the Department of Environmental Protection in Floridia. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/30/2013 Number of Days to Update: 182 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies RGA LF: Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List The EDR Recovered Government Archive Landfill database provides a list of landfills derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled from Records formerly available from the Department of Environmental Protection in Floridia. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2014 Number of Days to Update: 193 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies RGA LUST: Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank The EDR Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank database provides a list of LUST incidents derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled from Records formerly available from the Department of Environmental Protection in Floridia. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/30/2013 Number of Days to Update: 182 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies COUNTY RECORDS ALACHUA COUNTY: Facility List List of all regulated facilities in Alachua County. Date of Government Version: 03/28/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/29/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/15/2017 Number of Days to Update: 47 Source: Alachua County Environmental Protection Department Telephone: 352-264-6800 Last EDR Contact: 09/25/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/08/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually BROWARD COUNTY: TC5140197.2s Page GR-25 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Aboveground Storage Tanks Aboveground storage tank locations in Broward County. Date of Government Version: 06/06/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/17/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/22/2017 Number of Days to Update: 67 Source: Broward County Environmental Protection Department Telephone: 954-818-7509 Last EDR Contact: 12/01/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/12/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies Semi-Annual Inventory Report on Contaminated Locations Early Detection Incentive/Environmental Assessment Remediation. This report monitors the status and remediation progress of known contaminated locations within Broward County. Sites listed by the US EPA, the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, and sites licensed for contamination assessment and cleanup by the Division of Pollution Prevention and Remediation Programs of the Department. Date of Government Version: 08/29/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/30/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/27/2017 Number of Days to Update: 58 Source: Broward County Environmental Protection Department Telephone: 954-818-7509 Last EDR Contact: 11/27/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/12/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Hazardous Material Sites HM sites use or store greater than 25 gallons of hazardous materials per month. Date of Government Version: 06/06/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/17/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/20/2017 Number of Days to Update: 95 Source: Broward County Environmental Protection Department Telephone: 954-818-7509 Last EDR Contact: 12/01/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/12/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually Notice Of Violations Sites NOV facilities have received a notice of violation letter under the Broward County Chapter 27 Code. Date of Government Version: 06/06/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/17/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/20/2017 Number of Days to Update: 95 Source: Broward County Environmental Protection Department Telephone: 954-818-7509 Last EDR Contact: 12/01/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/12/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually Underground Storage Tanks All known regulated storage tanks within Broward County, including those tanks that have been closed Date of Government Version: 06/06/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/17/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/22/2017 Number of Days to Update: 67 Source: Broward County Environmental Protection Department Telephone: 954-818-7509 Last EDR Contact: 12/01/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/12/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY: Hillsborough County LF Hillsborough county landfill sites. Date of Government Version: 09/08/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/24/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/27/2017 Number of Days to Update: 34 Source: Hillsborough County Environmental Protection Commission Telephone: 813-627-2600 Last EDR Contact: 10/23/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/22/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies MIAMI-DADE COUNTY: TC5140197.2s Page GR-26 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Air Permit Sites Facilities that release or have a potential to release pollutants. Date of Government Version: 08/30/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/31/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/09/2017 Number of Days to Update: 70 Source: Department of Environmental Resources Management Telephone: 305-372-6755 Last EDR Contact: 11/27/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/12/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Liquid Waste Transporter List The Liquid Waste Transporter permit regulates the transportation of various types of liquid and solid waste, including hazardous waste, waste oil and oily waste waters, septic and grease trap waste, biomedical waste, spent radiator fluid, photo chemical waste, dry sewage sludge, and other types of non-hazardous industrial waste. The Liquid Waste Transporter permits needed to protect the environment and the public from improperly handled and transported waste. Date of Government Version: 08/30/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/31/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/09/2017 Number of Days to Update: 70 Source: DERM Telephone: 305-372-6755 Last EDR Contact: 11/28/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/12/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Grease Trap Sites Any non-residential facility that discharges waste to a sanitary sewer. Date of Government Version: 08/30/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/31/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/09/2017 Number of Days to Update: 70 Source: Dade County Dept. of Env. Resources Mgmt. Telephone: 305-372-6508 Last EDR Contact: 11/28/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/12/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Marine Facilities Operating Permit What is this permit used for? Miami-Dade County Ordinance 89-104 and Section 24-18 of the Code of Miami-Dade County require the following types of marine facilities to obtain annual operating permits from DERM: All recreational boat docking facilities with ten (10) or more boat slips, moorings, davit spaces, and vessel tie-up spaces. All boat storage facilities contiguous to tidal waters in Miami-Dade County with ten (10) or more dry storage spaces including boatyards and boat manufacturing facilities. Date of Government Version: 08/30/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/31/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/09/2017 Number of Days to Update: 70 Source: DERM Telephone: 305-372-3576 Last EDR Contact: 11/28/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/12/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Maimi River Enforcement The Miami River Enforcement database files were created for facilities and in some instances vessels that were inspected by a workgroup within the Department that was identified as the Miami River Enforcement Group. The files do not all necessarily reflect enforcement cases and some were created for locations that were permitted by other Sections within the Department. Date of Government Version: 06/05/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/06/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/06/2013 Number of Days to Update: 61 Source: DERM Telephone: 305-372-3576 Last EDR Contact: 11/27/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/12/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Hazardous Waste Sites Sites with the potential to generate waste TC5140197.2s Page GR-27 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 08/30/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/31/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/13/2017 Number of Days to Update: 74 Source: Dade County Department of Environmental Resources Management Telephone: 305-372-6755 Last EDR Contact: 11/28/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/12/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Industrial Waste Type 2-4 Sites IW2s are facilities having reclaim or recycling systems with no discharges, aboveground holding tanks or spill prevention and countermeasure plans. IW4s are facilities that discharge an effluent to the ground. Date of Government Version: 08/30/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/31/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/09/2017 Number of Days to Update: 70 Source: Department of Environmental Resources Management Telephone: 305-372-6700 Last EDR Contact: 11/28/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/12/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Industrial Waste Type 5 Sites Generally these facilities fall under the category of "conditionally exempt small quantity generator" or "small quantity generator". Date of Government Version: 08/30/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/31/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/09/2017 Number of Days to Update: 70 Source: Department of Environmental Resources Management Telephone: 305-372-6700 Last EDR Contact: 11/28/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/12/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Industrial Waste Type 6 Permits issued to those non-residential land uses located within the major drinking water wellfield protection areas that are not served by sanitary sewers. These facilities do not handle hazardous materials but are regulated because of the env. sensitivity of the areas where they are located. Date of Government Version: 08/30/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/31/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/09/2017 Number of Days to Update: 70 Source: Department of Environmental Resources Management Telephone: 305-372-6700 Last EDR Contact: 11/28/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/12/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Industrial Waste Permit Sites Facilities that either generate more than 25,000 of wastewater per day to sanitary sewers or are pre-defined by EPA. Date of Government Version: 08/30/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/31/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/09/2017 Number of Days to Update: 70 Source: Department of Environmental Resources Management Telephone: 305-372-6700 Last EDR Contact: 11/28/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/12/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Enforcement Case Tracking System Sites Enforcement cases monitored by the Dade County Department of Environmental Resources Management. Date of Government Version: 08/30/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/31/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/09/2017 Number of Days to Update: 70 Source: Department of Environmental Resources Management Telephone: 305-372-6755 Last EDR Contact: 11/28/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/12/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Fuel Spills Cases DERM documents fuel spills of sites that are not in a state program. TC5140197.2s Page GR-28 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 01/08/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/13/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/05/2009 Number of Days to Update: 23 Source: Department of Environmental Resources Management Telephone: 305-372-6755 Last EDR Contact: 11/27/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/12/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Storage Tanks A listing of aboveground and underground storage tank site locations. Date of Government Version: 06/01/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/02/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/01/2017 Number of Days to Update: 60 Source: Department of Environmental Resource Management Telephone: 305-372-6700 Last EDR Contact: 11/28/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/12/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually PALM BEACH COUNTY: Palm Beach County LF Palm Beach County Inventory of Solid Waste Sites. Date of Government Version: 09/01/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/20/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/10/2011 Number of Days to Update: 20 Source: Palm Beach County Solid Waste Authority Telephone: 561-640-4000 Last EDR Contact: 12/15/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/26/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies OTHER DATABASE(S) Depending on the geographic area covered by this report, the data provided in these specialty databases may or may not be complete. For example, the existence of wetlands information data in a specific report does not mean that all wetlands in the area covered by the report are included. Moreover, the absence of any reported wetlands information does not necessarily mean that wetlands do not exist in the area covered by the report. CT MANIFEST: Hazardous Waste Manifest Data Facility and manifest data. Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a tsd facility. Date of Government Version: 07/28/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/18/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/14/2017 Number of Days to Update: 88 Source: Department of Energy & Environmental Protection Telephone: 860-424-3375 Last EDR Contact: 11/14/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/26/2018 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned NJ MANIFEST: Manifest Information Hazardous waste manifest information. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/11/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/27/2017 Number of Days to Update: 107 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 10/05/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/22/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually NY MANIFEST: Facility and Manifest Data Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a TSD facility. TC5140197.2s Page GR-29 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 10/01/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/01/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/13/2017 Number of Days to Update: 12 Source: Department of Environmental Conservation Telephone: 518-402-8651 Last EDR Contact: 11/01/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/12/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly PA MANIFEST: Manifest Information Hazardous waste manifest information. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/25/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/25/2017 Number of Days to Update: 62 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 717-783-8990 Last EDR Contact: 10/16/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/29/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually RI MANIFEST: Manifest information Hazardous waste manifest information Date of Government Version: 12/31/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/19/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/15/2015 Number of Days to Update: 26 Source: Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 401-222-2797 Last EDR Contact: 11/16/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/05/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually WI MANIFEST: Manifest Information Hazardous waste manifest information. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/13/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/14/2017 Number of Days to Update: 92 Source: Department of Natural Resources Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 12/11/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/26/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually Oil/Gas Pipelines Source: PennWell Corporation Petroleum Bundle (Crude Oil, Refined Products, Petrochemicals, Gas Liquids (LPG/NGL), and Specialty Gases (Miscellaneous)) N = Natural Gas Bundle (Natural Gas, Gas Liquids (LPG/NGL), and Specialty Gases (Miscellaneous)). This map includes information copyrighted by PennWell Corporation. This information is provided on a best effort basis and PennWell Corporation does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its fitness for any particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of PennWell. Electric Power Transmission Line Data Source: PennWell Corporation This map includes information copyrighted by PennWell Corporation. This information is provided on a best effort basis and PennWell Corporation does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its fitness for any particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of PennWell. Sensitive Receptors: There are individuals deemed sensitive receptors due to their fragile immune systems and special sensitivity to environmental discharges. These sensitive receptors typically include the elderly, the sick, and children. While the location of all sensitive receptors cannot be determined, EDR indicates those buildings and facilities - schools, daycares, hospitals, medical centers, and nursing homes - where individuals who are sensitive receptors are likely to be located. AHA Hospitals: Source: American Hospital Association, Inc. Telephone: 312-280-5991 The database includes a listing of hospitals based on the American Hospital Association’s annual survey of hospitals. Medical Centers: Provider of Services Listing Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Telephone: 410-786-3000 A listing of hospitals with Medicare provider number, produced by Centers of Medicare & Medicaid Services, a federal agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Nursing Homes Source: National Institutes of Health Telephone: 301-594-6248 Information on Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes in the United States. TC5140197.2s Page GR-30 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Public Schools Source: National Center for Education Statistics Telephone: 202-502-7300 The National Center for Education Statistics’ primary database on elementary and secondary public education in the United States. It is a comprehensive, annual, national statistical database of all public elementary and secondary schools and school districts, which contains data that are comparable across all states. Private Schools Source: National Center for Education Statistics Telephone: 202-502-7300 The National Center for Education Statistics’ primary database on private school locations in the United States. Daycare Centers: Department of Children & Families Source: Provider Information Telephone: 850-488-4900 Flood Zone Data: This data was obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). It depicts 100-year and 500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. It includes the National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) which incorporates Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) data and Q3 data from FEMA in areas not covered by NFHL. Source: FEMA Telephone: 877-336-2627 Date of Government Version: 2003, 2015 NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. State Wetlands Data: Wetlands Inventory Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-245-8238 Current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map Source: U.S. Geological Survey STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION © 2015 TomTom North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material. TC5140197.2s Page GR-31 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING TC5140197.2s Page A-1 geologic strata. of the soil, and nearby wells. Groundwater flow velocity is generally impacted by the nature of the Groundwater flow direction may be impacted by surface topography, hydrology, hydrogeology, characteristics 2. Groundwater flow velocity. 1. Groundwater flow direction, and Assessment of the impact of contaminant migration generally has two principal investigative components: forming an opinion about the impact of potential contaminant migration. EDR’s GeoCheck Physical Setting Source Addendum is provided to assist the environmental professional in 2012Version Date: 5652664 CORKSCREW SW, FLEast Map: 2012Version Date: 5652584 BONITA SPRINGS, FLTarget Property Map: USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP 11 ft. above sea levelElevation: 2908960.0UTM Y (Meters): 424126.4UTM X (Meters): Zone 17Universal Tranverse Mercator: 81.76006 - 81˚ 45’ 36.22’’Longitude (West): 26.29994 - 26˚ 17’ 59.78’’Latitude (North): TARGET PROPERTY COORDINATES NAPLES, FL 34110 LIVINGSTON ROAD AND VETERANS MEMORIAL BLVD. LIVINGSTON ASSEMBLAGE TARGET PROPERTY ADDRESS ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE ADDENDUM® TC5140197.2s Page A-2 should be field verified. on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity Source: Topography has been determined from the USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated SURROUNDING TOPOGRAPHY: ELEVATION PROFILES Elevation (ft)Elevation (ft)TP TP 0 1/2 1 Miles✩Target Property Elevation: 11 ft. North South West East1010101010101011111111111111101010101012111111101010111111111110101010101011General ESEGeneral Topographic Gradient: TARGET PROPERTY TOPOGRAPHY should contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, Surface topography may be indicative of the direction of surficial groundwater flow. This information can be used to TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION collected on nearby properties, and regional groundwater flow information (from deep aquifers). sources of information, such as surface topographic information, hydrologic information, hydrogeologic data using site-specific well data. If such data is not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary to rely on other Groundwater flow direction for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION INFORMATION ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC5140197.2s Page A-3 Not Reported GENERAL DIRECTIONLOCATION GROUNDWATER FLOWFROM TPMAP ID hydrogeologically, and the depth to water table. authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, groundwater flow direction as determined flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted by environmental professionals to regulatory EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System to provide data on the general direction of groundwater AQUIFLOW® Search Radius: 1.000 Mile. Not found Status: 1.25 miles Search Radius: Site-Specific Hydrogeological Data*: * ©1996 Site-specific hydrogeological data gathered by CERCLIS Alerts, Inc., Bainbridge Island, WA. All rights reserved. All of the information and opinions presented are those of the cited EPA report(s), which were completed under a Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) investigation. contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should of groundwater flow direction in the immediate area. Such hydrogeologic information can be used to assist the Hydrogeologic information obtained by installation of wells on a specific site can often be an indicator HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION YES - refer to the Overview Map and Detail MapBONITA SPRINGS NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY NWI Electronic Data CoverageNWI Quad at Target Property FEMA FIRM Flood data12021C0211H FEMA FIRM Flood data12071C0659F Additional Panels in search area:FEMA Source Type FEMA FIRM Flood data12021C0192H Flood Plain Panel at Target Property FEMA Source Type FEMA FLOOD ZONE and bodies of water). Refer to the Physical Setting Source Map following this summary for hydrologic information (major waterways contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should Surface water can act as a hydrologic barrier to groundwater flow. Such hydrologic information can be used to assist HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC5140197.2s Page A-4 Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994). of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - a digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology ROCK STRATIGRAPHIC UNIT GEOLOGIC AGE IDENTIFICATION Stratifed SequenceCategory:CenozoicEra: QuaternarySystem: PleistoceneSeries: QpCode: (decoded above as Era, System & Series) at which contaminant migration may be occurring. Geologic information can be used by the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the relative speed GEOLOGIC INFORMATION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY move more quickly through sandy-gravelly types of soils than silty-clayey types of soils. characteristics data collected on nearby properties and regional soil information. In general, contaminant plumes to rely on other sources of information, including geologic age identification, rock stratigraphic unit and soil using site specific geologic and soil strata data. If such data are not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary Groundwater flow velocity information for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional GROUNDWATER FLOW VELOCITY INFORMATION ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc. 2 4 3 1 1 3 0 1/16 1/8 1/4 Miles TC5140197.2s Page A-6 Min: 5.1 Max: 8.4 Min: 4.23 Max: 14.11 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED Clayey sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED and Sand. Clayey Gravel 200), Silty, or passing No. pct. or less materials (35 Granularfine sandy loam29 inches25 inches 3 Min: 5.1 Max: 8.4 Min: 42.34 Max: 141.14 sand. Poorly graded Clean Sands, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED Sand. 200), Fine passing No. pct. or less materials (35 Granularfine sand25 inches 3 inches 2 Min: 5.1 Max: 7.8 Min: 42.34 Max: 141.14 sand. Poorly graded Clean Sands, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED Sand. 200), Fine passing No. pct. or less materials (35 Granularfine sand 3 inches 0 inches 1 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH) > 0 inchesDepth to Watertable Min: > 82 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min: HighCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Hydric Status: All hydric Very poorly drainedSoil Drainage Class: water table, or are shallow to an impervious layer. Class D - Very slow infiltration rates. Soils are clayey, have a highHydrologic Group: fine sandSoil Surface Texture: BocaSoil Component Name: Soil Map ID: 1 in a landscape. The following information is based on Soil Conservation Service SSURGO data. for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Soil Conservation Service (SCS) leads the National Cooperative Soil DOMINANT SOIL COMPOSITION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC5140197.2s Page A-7 Max: Min: Min: 14.11 Max: 141.14 Not reportedNot reportedbedrock55 inches55 inches 3 Min: 6.6 Max: 7.8 Min: 0.42 Max: 1.41 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED and Sand. Clayey Gravel 200), Silty, or passing No. pct. or less materials (35 Granularsandy clay loam55 inches29 inches 2 Min: 5.6 Max: 6.5 Min: 42.34 Max: 141.14 sand. Poorly graded Clean Sands, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED Sand. 200), Fine passing No. pct. or less materials (35 Granularfine sand29 inches 0 inches 1 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH) > 15 inchesDepth to Watertable Min: > 152 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min: HighCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Hydric Status: Partially hydric Poorly drainedSoil Drainage Class: drained and are classified. Class B/D - Drained/undrained hydrology class of soils that can beHydrologic Group: fine sandSoil Surface Texture: PinedaSoil Component Name: Soil Map ID: 2 Max: Min: Min: 14.11 Max: 141.14 Not reportedNot reportedbedrock29 inches29 inches 4 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH) ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC5140197.2s Page A-8 Poorly drainedSoil Drainage Class: drained and are classified. Class B/D - Drained/undrained hydrology class of soils that can beHydrologic Group: fine sandSoil Surface Texture: HolopawSoil Component Name: Soil Map ID: 4 Max: Min: Min: 14.11 Max: 141.14 Not reportedNot reportedbedrock29 inches29 inches 4 Min: 5.1 Max: 8.4 Min: 4.23 Max: 14.11 Clayey sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED and Sand. Clayey Gravel 200), Silty, or passing No. pct. or less materials (35 Granularfine sandy loam29 inches25 inches 3 Min: 5.1 Max: 8.4 Min: 42.34 Max: 141.14 sand. Poorly graded Clean Sands, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED Sand. 200), Fine passing No. pct. or less materials (35 Granularfine sand25 inches 3 inches 2 Min: 5.1 Max: 8.4 Min: 42.34 Max: 141.14 sand. Poorly graded Clean Sands, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED Sand. 200), Fine passing No. pct. or less materials (35 Granularfine sand 3 inches 0 inches 1 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH) > 31 inchesDepth to Watertable Min: > 82 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min: HighCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Hydric Status: Partially hydric Poorly drainedSoil Drainage Class: drained and are classified. Class B/D - Drained/undrained hydrology class of soils that can beHydrologic Group: fine sandSoil Surface Texture: BocaSoil Component Name: Soil Map ID: 3 ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC5140197.2s Page A-9 1.000State Database Nearest PWS within 0.001 milesFederal FRDS PWS 1.000Federal USGS WELL SEARCH DISTANCE INFORMATION SEARCH DISTANCE (miles)DATABASE opinion about the impact of contaminant migration on nearby drinking water wells. professional in assessing sources that may impact ground water flow direction, and in forming an EDR Local/Regional Water Agency records provide water well information to assist the environmental LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS Min: 5.1 Max: 8.4 Min: 42.34 Max: 141.14 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED and Sand. Clayey Gravel 200), Silty, or passing No. pct. or less materials (35 Granularloamy fine sand79 inches61 inches 3 Min: 5.1 Max: 8.4 Min: 1.41 Max: 14.11 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED and Sand. Clayey Gravel 200), Silty, or passing No. pct. or less materials (35 Granularfine sandy loam61 inches57 inches 2 Min: 5.1 Max: 7.3 Min: 42.34 Max: 141.14 sand. Poorly graded Clean Sands, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED Sand. 200), Fine passing No. pct. or less materials (35 Granularfine sand57 inches 0 inches 1 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH) > 15 inchesDepth to Watertable Min: > 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min: HighCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Hydric Status: Partially hydric ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC5140197.2s Page A-10 1/2 - 1 Mile EastFLSO80000025514 36 1/2 - 1 Mile ENEFLSO80000046045 I35 1/2 - 1 Mile WNWFLSO80000047824 H34 1/2 - 1 Mile NEFLSO80000046220 I33 1/2 - 1 Mile NEFLSO80000046053 I32 1/2 - 1 Mile NEFLSO80000046226 I31 1/2 - 1 Mile NEFLSO80000046221 I30 1/2 - 1 Mile NEFLSO80000046050 I29 1/2 - 1 Mile NEFLSO80000046049 I28 1/2 - 1 Mile NEFLSO80000046052 I27 1/2 - 1 Mile NEFLSO80000046051 I26 1/2 - 1 Mile WNWFLSO80000047826 H25 1/2 - 1 Mile SSWFLSO80000027763 24 1/4 - 1/2 Mile NNEFLSO80000024346 23 1/4 - 1/2 Mile SSWFLSO80000027762 F22 1/4 - 1/2 Mile SSEFLSO80000017174 E21 1/4 - 1/2 Mile WestFLSO80000014792 G20 1/4 - 1/2 Mile WestFLSO80000014793 G19 1/4 - 1/2 Mile SSEFLSO80000056642 E18 1/4 - 1/2 Mile ESEFLSO80000025508 17 1/4 - 1/2 Mile SSWFLSO80000056645 F16 1/4 - 1/2 Mile SSEFLSO80000056639 E15 1/4 - 1/2 Mile SouthFLSO80000017173 14 1/4 - 1/2 Mile WestFLSO80000051622 D13 1/4 - 1/2 Mile WSWFLSO80000051621 D12 1/4 - 1/2 Mile SWFLSO80000010250 11 1/8 - 1/4 Mile SouthFLSO80000026480 C10 1/8 - 1/4 Mile SouthFLSO80000026669 C9 1/8 - 1/4 Mile SSWFLSO80000055305 B8 1/8 - 1/4 Mile SSWFLSO80000055304 B7 1/8 - 1/4 Mile SSWFLSO80000055303 B6 0 - 1/8 Mile EastFLSO80000026484 A5 0 - 1/8 Mile EastFLSO80000026485 A4 0 - 1/8 Mile EastFLSO80000026483 A3 0 - 1/8 Mile EastFLSO80000026481 A2 0 - 1/8 Mile EastFLSO80000026482 A1 STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION LOCATION FROM TPWELL IDMAP ID Note: PWS System location is not always the same as well location. No PWS System Found FEDERAL FRDS PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM INFORMATION LOCATION FROM TPWELL IDMAP ID 1/2 - 1 Mile SSEUSGS40000236032 X94 FEDERAL USGS WELL INFORMATION LOCATION FROM TPWELL IDMAP ID ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC5140197.2s Page A-11 1/2 - 1 Mile EastFLSO80000025505 88 1/2 - 1 Mile ESEFLSO80000025118 87 1/2 - 1 Mile NWFLSO80000024352 U86 1/2 - 1 Mile WestFLSO80000042529 85 1/2 - 1 Mile SSEFLSO80000056641 V84 1/2 - 1 Mile SSEFLSO80000013155 V83 1/2 - 1 Mile NWFLSO80000047825 U82 1/2 - 1 Mile ESEFLSO80000025515 T81 1/2 - 1 Mile EastFLSO80000025121 T80 1/2 - 1 Mile SSEFLSO80000013154 79 1/2 - 1 Mile EastFLSO80000025506 78 1/2 - 1 Mile WSWFLSO80000042534 77 1/2 - 1 Mile SEFLSO80000028857 76 1/2 - 1 Mile SSEFLSO80000056644 R75 1/2 - 1 Mile NorthFLSO80000024541 S74 1/2 - 1 Mile NorthFLSO80000024351 S73 1/2 - 1 Mile SSEFLSO80000013156 R72 1/2 - 1 Mile SSWFLSO80000042533 71 1/2 - 1 Mile SSEFLSO80000031608 Q70 1/2 - 1 Mile EastFLSO80000025512 69 1/2 - 1 Mile SSEFLSO80000031436 Q68 1/2 - 1 Mile WNWFLSO80000024349 P67 1/2 - 1 Mile WNWFLSO80000024350 P66 1/2 - 1 Mile WNWFLSO80000024347 P65 1/2 - 1 Mile WNWFLSO80000024348 P64 1/2 - 1 Mile WNWFLSO80000024342 O63 1/2 - 1 Mile ESEFLSO80000025510 N62 1/2 - 1 Mile NWFLSO80000024341 O61 1/2 - 1 Mile ENEFLSO80000046047 60 1/2 - 1 Mile SSWFLSO80000056640 L59 1/2 - 1 Mile ESEFLSO80000025513 N58 1/2 - 1 Mile ESEFLSO80000025120 N57 1/2 - 1 Mile ESEFLSO80000025507 N56 1/2 - 1 Mile SSWFLSO80000023248 M55 1/2 - 1 Mile SSWFLSO80000023247 M54 1/2 - 1 Mile WNWFLSO80000032469 J53 1/2 - 1 Mile SSWFLSO80000056628 L52 1/2 - 1 Mile NEFLSO80000046223 51 1/2 - 1 Mile NWFLSO80000047823 K50 1/2 - 1 Mile WNWFLSO80000032470 J49 1/2 - 1 Mile WSWFLSO80000051623 48 1/2 - 1 Mile SWFLSO80000056643 47 1/2 - 1 Mile WNWFLSO80000047830 H46 1/2 - 1 Mile WNWFLSO80000047831 H45 1/2 - 1 Mile WNWFLSO80000047832 H44 1/2 - 1 Mile WNWFLSO80000047827 H43 1/2 - 1 Mile WNWFLSO80000047828 H42 1/2 - 1 Mile WNWFLSO80000047829 H41 1/2 - 1 Mile SEFLSO80000056627 40 1/2 - 1 Mile NWFLSO80000024343 K39 1/2 - 1 Mile WNWFLSO80000032471 J38 1/2 - 1 Mile SouthFLSO80000040442 37 STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION LOCATION FROM TPWELL IDMAP ID ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC5140197.2s Page A-12 1/2 - 1 Mile SSEFLSO80000046915 X98 1/2 - 1 Mile SSEFLSO80000027390 X97 1/2 - 1 Mile SSEFLSO80000046916 X96 1/2 - 1 Mile SSEFLSO80000027391 X95 1/2 - 1 Mile NNEFLSO80000046046 W93 1/2 - 1 Mile NNEFLSO80000046222 W92 1/2 - 1 Mile ESEFLSO80000025504 91 1/2 - 1 Mile NNWFLSO80000024345 90 1/2 - 1 Mile EastFLSO80000025122 89 STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION LOCATION FROM TPWELL IDMAP ID ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc. FL TC5140197.2s Page A-14 PFacwlsts c:PRMUsests cod: 0Cased dept: 0Well depth: 715343Pump coo 1: 407778Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 0Pump int 1: 0Pump intak: 2000Pump capac: 0Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 12Pump diame: CENPumptype c: P-1Fac name: PUMPFacinv typ: 267864Id: 51.1Acres serv: DEWLu code: BRANDONProject na:GPActual per: 140207-11App no:11-03533-WPermit no: A2 East 0 - 1/8 Mile Higher FLSO80000026481FL WELLS FLSO80000026482Site id: STDEWFee catego:John RandallDisplay na: Water Table aquiferSource nam: MNDFactypwu c: PFacwlsts c:PRMUsests cod: 0Cased dept: 0Well depth: 715343Pump coo 1: 407778Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 0Pump int 1: 0Pump intak: 2000Pump capac: 0Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 12Pump diame: CENPumptype c: P-2Fac name: PUMPFacinv typ: 267865Id: 51.1Acres serv: DEWLu code: BRANDONProject na:GPActual per: 140207-11App no:11-03533-WPermit no: A1 East 0 - 1/8 Mile Higher FLSO80000026482FL WELLS Map ID Direction Distance Elevation EDR ID NumberDatabase ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC5140197.2s Page A-15 PFacwlsts c:PRMUsests cod: 0Cased dept: 0Well depth: 715343Pump coo 1: 407778Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 0Pump int 1: 0Pump intak: 2000Pump capac: 0Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 12Pump diame: CENPumptype c: P-5Fac name: PUMPFacinv typ: 267868Id: 51.1Acres serv: DEWLu code: BRANDONProject na:GPActual per: 140207-11App no:11-03533-WPermit no: A4 East 0 - 1/8 Mile Higher FLSO80000026485FL WELLS FLSO80000026483Site id: STDEWFee catego:John RandallDisplay na: Water Table aquiferSource nam: MNDFactypwu c: PFacwlsts c:PRMUsests cod: 0Cased dept: 0Well depth: 715343Pump coo 1: 407778Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 0Pump int 1: 0Pump intak: 2000Pump capac: 0Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 12Pump diame: CENPumptype c: P-3Fac name: PUMPFacinv typ: 267866Id: 51.1Acres serv: DEWLu code: BRANDONProject na:GPActual per: 140207-11App no:11-03533-WPermit no: A3 East 0 - 1/8 Mile Higher FLSO80000026483FL WELLS FLSO80000026481Site id: STDEWFee catego:John RandallDisplay na: Water Table aquiferSource nam: MNDFactypwu c: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC5140197.2s Page A-16 PFacwlsts c:PRMUsests cod: 0Cased dept: 0Well depth: 714684Pump coo 1: 406704Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 0Pump int 1: 0Pump intak: 2500Pump capac: 0Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 8Pump diame: CENPumptype c: 3Fac name: PUMPFacinv typ: 216752Id: 1Acres serv: DEWLu code: NORTH NAPLES FIRE STATION # 48Project na:GPActual per: 090605-8App no:11-02753-WPermit no: B6 SSW 1/8 - 1/4 Mile Higher FLSO80000055303FL WELLS FLSO80000026484Site id: STDEWFee catego:John RandallDisplay na: Water Table aquiferSource nam: MNDFactypwu c: PFacwlsts c:PRMUsests cod: 0Cased dept: 0Well depth: 715343Pump coo 1: 407778Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 0Pump int 1: 0Pump intak: 2000Pump capac: 0Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 12Pump diame: CENPumptype c: P-4Fac name: PUMPFacinv typ: 267867Id: 51.1Acres serv: DEWLu code: BRANDONProject na:GPActual per: 140207-11App no:11-03533-WPermit no: A5 East 0 - 1/8 Mile Higher FLSO80000026484FL WELLS FLSO80000026485Site id: STDEWFee catego:John RandallDisplay na: Water Table aquiferSource nam: MNDFactypwu c: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC5140197.2s Page A-17 PFacwlsts c:PRMUsests cod: 0Cased dept: 0Well depth: 714684Pump coo 1: 406704Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 0Pump int 1: 0Pump intak: 2500Pump capac: 0Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 8Pump diame: CENPumptype c: 1Fac name: PUMPFacinv typ: 216754Id: 1Acres serv: DEWLu code: NORTH NAPLES FIRE STATION # 48Project na:GPActual per: 090605-8App no:11-02753-WPermit no: B8 SSW 1/8 - 1/4 Mile Higher FLSO80000055305FL WELLS FLSO80000055304Site id: GP MINFee catego:Taryn BoomgaardDisplay na: Water Table aquiferSource nam: MNDFactypwu c: PFacwlsts c:PRMUsests cod: 0Cased dept: 0Well depth: 714684Pump coo 1: 406704Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 0Pump int 1: 0Pump intak: 2500Pump capac: 0Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 8Pump diame: CENPumptype c: 2Fac name: PUMPFacinv typ: 216753Id: 1Acres serv: DEWLu code: NORTH NAPLES FIRE STATION # 48Project na:GPActual per: 090605-8App no:11-02753-WPermit no: B7 SSW 1/8 - 1/4 Mile Higher FLSO80000055304FL WELLS FLSO80000055303Site id: GP MINFee catego:Taryn BoomgaardDisplay na: Water Table aquiferSource nam: MNDFactypwu c: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC5140197.2s Page A-18 PFacwlsts c:PRMUsests cod: 40Cased dept: 60Well depth: 714158Pump coo 1: 407044Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 0Pump int 1: 25Pump intak: 150Pump capac: 6Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 0Pump diame: SUBPumptype c: IW-1Fac name: WELLFacinv typ: 267846Id: 51.1Acres serv: LANLu code: BRANDONProject na:GPActual per: 140207-10App no:11-03532-WPermit no: C10 South 1/8 - 1/4 Mile Higher FLSO80000026480FL WELLS FLSO80000026669Site id: GP MINFee catego:John RandallDisplay na: On-site Lake(s)Source nam: IRRFactypwu c: PFacwlsts c:PRMUsests cod: 0Cased dept: 0Well depth: 714201Pump coo 1: 406976Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 0Pump int 1: 0Pump intak: 200Pump capac: 0Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 6Pump diame: SUBPumptype c: SWP-1Fac name: PUMPFacinv typ: 267847Id: 51.1Acres serv: LANLu code: BRANDONProject na:GPActual per: 140207-10App no:11-03532-WPermit no: C9 South 1/8 - 1/4 Mile Higher FLSO80000026669FL WELLS FLSO80000055305Site id: GP MINFee catego:Taryn BoomgaardDisplay na: Water Table aquiferSource nam: MNDFactypwu c: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC5140197.2s Page A-19 PFacwlsts c:PRMUsests cod: 20Cased dept: 40Well depth: 714985Pump coo 1: 405610Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 0Pump int 1: 0Pump intak: 250Pump capac: 8Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 0Pump diame: #N/APumptype c: Well 1Fac name: WELLFacinv typ: 120924Id: 14.07Acres serv: LANLu code: NORTH NAPLES MIDDLE SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION TRAProject na:GPActual per: 030721-3App no:11-02112-WPermit no: D12 WSW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher FLSO80000051621FL WELLS FLSO80000010250Site id: GP MINFee catego:Clyde G. Dabbs, Jr., P.G.Display na: Lower Tamiami AquiferSource nam: IRRFactypwu c: PFacwlsts c:PRMUsests cod: 60Cased dept: 80Well depth: 714160Pump coo 1: 406250Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 0Pump int 1: 0Pump intak: 60Pump capac: 6Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 0Pump diame: SUBPumptype c: W-1Fac name: WELLFacinv typ: 268381Id: 12.18Acres serv: LANLu code: GRACE ROMANIAN BAPTIST CHURCHProject na:GPActual per: 131209-11App no:11-03509-WPermit no: 11 SW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher FLSO80000010250FL WELLS FLSO80000026480Site id: GP MINFee catego:John RandallDisplay na: Surficial Aquifer SystemSource nam: IRRFactypwu c: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC5140197.2s Page A-20 EFacwlsts c:PRMUsests cod: 15Cased dept: 35Well depth: 713613Pump coo 1: 407494Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 0Pump int 1: 17Pump intak: 45Pump capac: 4Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 0Pump diame: SUBPumptype c: PW-1Fac name: WELLFacinv typ: 215924Id: 7.9Acres serv: LANLu code: VERONA POINTEProject na:GPActual per: 080204-26App no:11-02739-WPermit no: 14 South 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher FLSO80000017173FL WELLS FLSO80000051622Site id: GP MINFee catego:Kimberly ArnoldDisplay na: On-site Lake(s)Source nam: IRRFactypwu c: PFacwlsts c:PRMUsests cod: 0Cased dept: 0Well depth: 715288Pump coo 1: 405477Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 0Pump int 1: 0Pump intak: 250Pump capac: 0Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 4Pump diame: CENPumptype c: SWP-1Fac name: PUMPFacinv typ: 120925Id: 14.07Acres serv: LANLu code: NORTH NAPLES MIDDLE SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION TRAProject na:GPActual per: 030721-3App no:11-02112-WPermit no: D13 West 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher FLSO80000051622FL WELLS FLSO80000051621Site id: GP MINFee catego:Kimberly ArnoldDisplay na: Water Table AquiferSource nam: IRLFactypwu c: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC5140197.2s Page A-21 EFacwlsts c:PNCUsests cod: 20Cased dept: 40Well depth: 713410Pump coo 1: 406674Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 0Pump int 1: 0Pump intak: 0Pump capac: 8Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 0Pump diame: CENPumptype c: Well 5Fac name: WELLFacinv typ: 188437Id: 3.33Acres serv: LANLu code: ROYAL PALM ACADEMYProject na:GPActual per: 120917-2App no:11-01887-WPermit no: F16 SSW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher FLSO80000056645FL WELLS FLSO80000056639Site id: GP MINFee catego:Michael Taylor, P.G.Display na: Water Table AquiferSource nam: IRLFactypwu c: PFacwlsts c:PNCUsests cod: 20Cased dept: 40Well depth: 713561Pump coo 1: 407998Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 0Pump int 1: 40Pump intak: 0Pump capac: 8Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 0Pump diame: CENPumptype c: Well 3Fac name: WELLFacinv typ: 135398Id: 3.33Acres serv: LANLu code: ROYAL PALM ACADEMYProject na:GPActual per: 120917-2App no:11-01887-WPermit no: E15 SSE 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher FLSO80000056639FL WELLS FLSO80000017173Site id: GPFee catego:Mary E. McNamaraDisplay na: Water Table AquiferSource nam: IRRFactypwu c: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC5140197.2s Page A-22 PFacwlsts c:PNCUsests cod: 0Cased dept: 0Well depth: 713531Pump coo 1: 408392Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 0Pump int 1: 0Pump intak: 0Pump capac: 0Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 6Pump diame: CENPumptype c: Pump 3Fac name: PUMPFacinv typ: 135850Id: 3.33Acres serv: LANLu code: ROYAL PALM ACADEMYProject na:GPActual per: 120917-2App no:11-01887-WPermit no: E18 SSE 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher FLSO80000056642FL WELLS FLSO80000025508Site id: GP MAJFee catego:Paulette M. Glebocki, P.G.Display na: Water Table AquiferSource nam: IRLFactypwu c: EFacwlsts c:PRMUsests cod: 14Cased dept: 30Well depth: 714851Pump coo 1: 409161Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 0Pump int 1: 13Pump intak: 50Pump capac: 6Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 0Pump diame: SUBPumptype c: WT-2Fac name: WELLFacinv typ: 252512Id: 40.04Acres serv: LANLu code: THE STRAND MASTER PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATProject na:GPActual per: 140529-22App no:11-03069-WPermit no: 17 ESE 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher FLSO80000025508FL WELLS FLSO80000056645Site id: GP MINFee catego:Michael Taylor, P.G.Display na: Water Table AquiferSource nam: IRLFactypwu c: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC5140197.2s Page A-23 PFacwlsts c:PRMUsests cod: 21Cased dept: 35Well depth: 715537.405Pump coo 1: 404815.725Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 0Pump int 1: 15Pump intak: 50Pump capac: 6Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 0Pump diame: SUBPumptype c: PW-1Fac name: WELLFacinv typ: 223907Id: 13.12Acres serv: LANLu code: CCPS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 1 (AKA VETERANS MEMOProject na:GPActual per: 080616-11App no:11-02903-WPermit no: G20 West 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher FLSO80000014792FL WELLS FLSO80000014793Site id: GP MINFee catego:John RandallDisplay na: On-site Lake(s)Source nam: IRRFactypwu c: PFacwlsts c:PRMUsests cod: 0Cased dept: 0Well depth: 715182.554Pump coo 1: 404828.656Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 10Pump int 1: 0Pump intak: 50Pump capac: 0Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 3Pump diame: CENPumptype c: SWP-1Fac name: PUMPFacinv typ: 223956Id: 13.12Acres serv: LANLu code: CCPS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 1 (AKA VETERANS MEMOProject na:GPActual per: 080616-11App no:11-02903-WPermit no: G19 West 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher FLSO80000014793FL WELLS FLSO80000056642Site id: GP MINFee catego:Michael Taylor, P.G.Display na: On-site Lake(s)Source nam: IRRFactypwu c: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC5140197.2s Page A-24 PFacwlsts c:PRMUsests cod: 20Cased dept: 40Well depth: 713031Pump coo 1: 406499Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 0Pump int 1: 0Pump intak: 500Pump capac: 8Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 0Pump diame: CENPumptype c: Well 1Fac name: WELLFacinv typ: 263719Id: 16.11Acres serv: LANLu code: ROYAL PALM ACADEMY IProject na:GPActual per: 120806-7App no:11-03409-WPermit no: F22 SSW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher FLSO80000027762FL WELLS FLSO80000017174Site id: GPFee catego:Mary E. McNamaraDisplay na: On-site Lake(s)Source nam: IRRFactypwu c: EFacwlsts c:PRMUsests cod: 0Cased dept: 0Well depth: 713250Pump coo 1: 408096Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 7Pump int 1: 0Pump intak: 100Pump capac: 0Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 6Pump diame: CENPumptype c: SWP-1Fac name: PUMPFacinv typ: 215925Id: 7.9Acres serv: LANLu code: VERONA POINTEProject na:GPActual per: 080204-26App no:11-02739-WPermit no: E21 SSE 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher FLSO80000017174FL WELLS FLSO80000014792Site id: GP MINFee catego:John RandallDisplay na: Water Table AquiferSource nam: IRLFactypwu c: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC5140197.2s Page A-25 PFacwlsts c:PRMUsests cod: 20Cased dept: 40Well depth: 713096Pump coo 1: 405836Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 0Pump int 1: 0Pump intak: 500Pump capac: 8Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 0Pump diame: CENPumptype c: Well 2Fac name: WELLFacinv typ: 263721Id: 16.11Acres serv: LANLu code: ROYAL PALM ACADEMY IProject na:GPActual per: 120806-7App no:11-03409-WPermit no: 24 SSW 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000027763FL WELLS FLSO80000024346Site id: INDFee catego:Andrew SteinerDisplay na: Water Table AquiferSource nam: IRLFactypwu c: EFacwlsts c:PRMUsests cod: 17Cased dept: 39Well depth: 717906Pump coo 1: 407696Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 0Pump int 1: -5Pump intak: 700Pump capac: 12Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 0Pump diame: SUBPumptype c: 6Fac name: WELLFacinv typ: 114570Id: 678Acres serv: LANLu code: MEDITERRAProject na:INDActual per: 130227-7App no:11-00171-WPermit no: 23 NNE 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher FLSO80000024346FL WELLS FLSO80000027762Site id: GP MINFee catego:Swagata Guha, Ph.D.Display na: Water Table AquiferSource nam: IRRFactypwu c: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC5140197.2s Page A-26 EFacwlsts c:PRMUsests cod: 0Cased dept: 0Well depth: 717027Pump coo 1: 409394Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 5Pump int 1: 0Pump intak: 600Pump capac: 0Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 6Pump diame: VETPumptype c: GC-3Fac name: PUMPFacinv typ: 196748Id: 222.62Acres serv: GOLLu code: TALIS PARKProject na:GPActual per: 140701-8App no:11-00151-WPermit no: I26 NE 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000046051FL WELLS FLSO80000047826Site id: INDFee catego:John RandallDisplay na: Sandstone AquiferSource nam: IRLFactypwu c: EFacwlsts c:RCHUsests cod: 130Cased dept: 160Well depth: 716562Pump coo 1: 404685Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 0Pump int 1: 80Pump intak: 500Pump capac: 12Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 0Pump diame: SUBPumptype c: SS-1Fac name: WELLFacinv typ: 262552Id: 306.2Acres serv: LANLu code: THE CLUB AT MEDITERRAProject na:INDActual per: 140523-7App no:11-03361-WPermit no: H25 WNW 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000047826FL WELLS FLSO80000027763Site id: GP MINFee catego:Swagata Guha, Ph.D.Display na: Water Table AquiferSource nam: IRRFactypwu c: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC5140197.2s Page A-27 EFacwlsts c:PRMUsests cod: 0Cased dept: 0Well depth: 717027Pump coo 1: 409394Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 5Pump int 1: 0Pump intak: 600Pump capac: 0Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 6Pump diame: VETPumptype c: HOA-3Fac name: PUMPFacinv typ: 196745Id: 222.62Acres serv: GOLLu code: TALIS PARKProject na:GPActual per: 140701-8App no:11-00151-WPermit no: I28 NE 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000046049FL WELLS FLSO80000046052Site id: INDFee catego:Nexhip Maska, P.G.Display na: On-site Lake(s)Source nam: IRRFactypwu c: EFacwlsts c:PRMUsests cod: 0Cased dept: 0Well depth: 717027Pump coo 1: 409394Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 5Pump int 1: 0Pump intak: 600Pump capac: 0Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 6Pump diame: VETPumptype c: GC-2Fac name: PUMPFacinv typ: 196749Id: 222.62Acres serv: GOLLu code: TALIS PARKProject na:GPActual per: 140701-8App no:11-00151-WPermit no: I27 NE 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000046052FL WELLS FLSO80000046051Site id: INDFee catego:Nexhip Maska, P.G.Display na: On-site Lake(s)Source nam: IRRFactypwu c: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC5140197.2s Page A-28 EFacwlsts c:PRMUsests cod: 0Cased dept: 0Well depth: 717027Pump coo 1: 409394Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 5Pump int 1: 0Pump intak: 10Pump capac: 0Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 2Pump diame: SUBPumptype c: PM-2Fac name: PUMPFacinv typ: 196752Id: 222.62Acres serv: GOLLu code: TALIS PARKProject na:GPActual per: 140701-8App no:11-00151-WPermit no: I30 NE 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000046221FL WELLS FLSO80000046050Site id: INDFee catego:Nexhip Maska, P.G.Display na: On-site Lake(s)Source nam: IRRFactypwu c: EFacwlsts c:PRMUsests cod: 0Cased dept: 0Well depth: 717027Pump coo 1: 409394Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 5Pump int 1: 0Pump intak: 600Pump capac: 0Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 6Pump diame: VETPumptype c: HOA-2Fac name: PUMPFacinv typ: 196746Id: 222.62Acres serv: GOLLu code: TALIS PARKProject na:GPActual per: 140701-8App no:11-00151-WPermit no: I29 NE 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000046050FL WELLS FLSO80000046049Site id: INDFee catego:Nexhip Maska, P.G.Display na: On-site Lake(s)Source nam: IRRFactypwu c: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC5140197.2s Page A-29 EFacwlsts c:PRMUsests cod: 0Cased dept: 0Well depth: 717027Pump coo 1: 409394Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 5Pump int 1: 0Pump intak: 600Pump capac: 0Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 6Pump diame: VETPumptype c: GC-1Fac name: PUMPFacinv typ: 196750Id: 222.62Acres serv: GOLLu code: TALIS PARKProject na:GPActual per: 140701-8App no:11-00151-WPermit no: I32 NE 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000046053FL WELLS FLSO80000046226Site id: INDFee catego:Nexhip Maska, P.G.Display na: On-site Lake(s)Source nam: IRRFactypwu c: EFacwlsts c:PRMUsests cod: 0Cased dept: 0Well depth: 717027Pump coo 1: 409394Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 5Pump int 1: 0Pump intak: 600Pump capac: 0Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 6Pump diame: VETPumptype c: HOA-1Fac name: PUMPFacinv typ: 196747Id: 222.62Acres serv: GOLLu code: TALIS PARKProject na:GPActual per: 140701-8App no:11-00151-WPermit no: I31 NE 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000046226FL WELLS FLSO80000046221Site id: INDFee catego:Nexhip Maska, P.G.Display na: On-site Lake(s)Source nam: IRRFactypwu c: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC5140197.2s Page A-30 EFacwlsts c:PRMUsests cod: 65Cased dept: 100Well depth: 716693Pump coo 1: 404680Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 0Pump int 1: 45Pump intak: 500Pump capac: 8Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 0Pump diame: SUBPumptype c: LT-2Fac name: WELLFacinv typ: 262550Id: 306.2Acres serv: LANLu code: THE CLUB AT MEDITERRAProject na:INDActual per: 140523-7App no:11-03361-WPermit no: H34 WNW 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000047824FL WELLS FLSO80000046220Site id: INDFee catego:Nexhip Maska, P.G.Display na: On-site Lake(s)Source nam: IRRFactypwu c: EFacwlsts c:PRMUsests cod: 0Cased dept: 0Well depth: 717027Pump coo 1: 409394Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 5Pump int 1: 0Pump intak: 10Pump capac: 0Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 2Pump diame: SUBPumptype c: PM-1Fac name: PUMPFacinv typ: 196751Id: 222.62Acres serv: GOLLu code: TALIS PARKProject na:GPActual per: 140701-8App no:11-00151-WPermit no: I33 NE 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000046220FL WELLS FLSO80000046053Site id: INDFee catego:Nexhip Maska, P.G.Display na: On-site Lake(s)Source nam: IRRFactypwu c: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC5140197.2s Page A-31 EFacwlsts c:PRMUsests cod: 0Cased dept: 0Well depth: 715169Pump coo 1: 410017Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 0Pump int 1: 0Pump intak: 100Pump capac: 0Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 3Pump diame: SUBPumptype c: SP-16Fac name: PUMPFacinv typ: 252940Id: 40.04Acres serv: LANLu code: THE STRAND MASTER PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATProject na:GPActual per: 140529-22App no:11-03069-WPermit no: 36 East 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower FLSO80000025514FL WELLS FLSO80000046045Site id: INDFee catego:Nexhip Maska, P.G.Display na: Water Table AquiferSource nam: IRLFactypwu c: EFacwlsts c:STDUsests cod: 19.5Cased dept: 43Well depth: 716891Pump coo 1: 409543Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 0Pump int 1: 16.5Pump intak: 500Pump capac: 10Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 0Pump diame: SUBPumptype c: PW-4Fac name: WELLFacinv typ: 127649Id: 222.62Acres serv: GOLLu code: TALIS PARKProject na:GPActual per: 140701-8App no:11-00151-WPermit no: I35 ENE 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000046045FL WELLS FLSO80000047824Site id: INDFee catego:John RandallDisplay na: Lower Tamiami AquiferSource nam: IRLFactypwu c: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC5140197.2s Page A-32 PFacwlsts c:PRMUsests cod: 70Cased dept: 120Well depth: 716173Pump coo 1: 404363Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 0Pump int 1: 50Pump intak: 250Pump capac: 6Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 0Pump diame: SUBPumptype c: PW-3Fac name: WELLFacinv typ: 260996Id: 12.39Acres serv: LANLu code: SANDALWOOD PROJECTProject na:GPActual per: 110624-11App no:11-03232-WPermit no: J38 WNW 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000032471FL WELLS FLSO80000040442Site id: GPFee catego:Terry O. Bengtsson P.G.Display na: On-site Lake(s)/Pond(s)Source nam: IRRFactypwu c: PFacwlsts c:PRMUsests cod: 0Cased dept: 0Well depth: 712577Pump coo 1: 406850Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 6Pump int 1: 0Pump intak: 50Pump capac: 0Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 2Pump diame: CENPumptype c: 1Fac name: PUMPFacinv typ: 117505Id: 2.5Acres serv: LANLu code: VILLAGES OF MADEIRAProject na:GPActual per: 000601-6App no:11-02070-WPermit no: 37 South 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000040442FL WELLS FLSO80000025514Site id: GP MAJFee catego:Paulette M. Glebocki, P.G.Display na: On-site Lake(s)Source nam: IRRFactypwu c: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC5140197.2s Page A-33 EFacwlsts c:PRMUsests cod: 20Cased dept: 40Well depth: 713058Pump coo 1: 408935Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 0Pump int 1: 15Pump intak: 25Pump capac: 4Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 0Pump diame: SUBPumptype c: Well 1Fac name: WELLFacinv typ: 103864Id: 3.33Acres serv: LANLu code: ROYAL PALM ACADEMYProject na:GPActual per: 120917-2App no:11-01887-WPermit no: 40 SE 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000056627FL WELLS FLSO80000024343Site id: INDFee catego:Andrew SteinerDisplay na: Water Table AquiferSource nam: IRLFactypwu c: EFacwlsts c:PRMUsests cod: 20Cased dept: 30Well depth: 717195Pump coo 1: 404826Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 0Pump int 1: -10Pump intak: 450Pump capac: 10Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 0Pump diame: SUBPumptype c: 3Fac name: WELLFacinv typ: 31757Id: 678Acres serv: LANLu code: MEDITERRAProject na:INDActual per: 130227-7App no:11-00171-WPermit no: K39 NW 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000024343FL WELLS FLSO80000032471Site id: GP MINFee catego:Michael Taylor, P.G.Display na: Lower Tamiami AquiferSource nam: IRRFactypwu c: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC5140197.2s Page A-34 EFacwlsts c:PRMUsests cod: 0Cased dept: 0Well depth: 716836Pump coo 1: 404534Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 0Pump int 1: 0Pump intak: 900Pump capac: 0Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 8Pump diame: CENPumptype c: SW-2Fac name: PUMPFacinv typ: 262573Id: 306.2Acres serv: LANLu code: THE CLUB AT MEDITERRAProject na:INDActual per: 140523-7App no:11-03361-WPermit no: H42 WNW 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000047828FL WELLS FLSO80000047829Site id: INDFee catego:John RandallDisplay na: Off-site Lake(s)Source nam: IRRFactypwu c: EFacwlsts c:PRMUsests cod: 0Cased dept: 0Well depth: 716836Pump coo 1: 404534Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 16Pump int 1: 0Pump intak: 900Pump capac: 0Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 8Pump diame: CENPumptype c: SW-3Fac name: PUMPFacinv typ: 262600Id: 306.2Acres serv: LANLu code: THE CLUB AT MEDITERRAProject na:INDActual per: 140523-7App no:11-03361-WPermit no: H41 WNW 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000047829FL WELLS FLSO80000056627Site id: GP MINFee catego:Michael Taylor, P.G.Display na: Water Table AquiferSource nam: IRRFactypwu c: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC5140197.2s Page A-35 EFacwlsts c:PRMUsests cod: 0Cased dept: 0Well depth: 716836Pump coo 1: 404534Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 16Pump int 1: 0Pump intak: 900Pump capac: 0Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 8Pump diame: CENPumptype c: SW-6Fac name: PUMPFacinv typ: 262603Id: 306.2Acres serv: LANLu code: THE CLUB AT MEDITERRAProject na:INDActual per: 140523-7App no:11-03361-WPermit no: H44 WNW 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000047832FL WELLS FLSO80000047827Site id: INDFee catego:John RandallDisplay na: Off-site Lake(s)Source nam: IRRFactypwu c: EFacwlsts c:PRMUsests cod: 0Cased dept: 0Well depth: 716836Pump coo 1: 404534Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 16Pump int 1: 0Pump intak: 900Pump capac: 0Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 8Pump diame: CENPumptype c: SW-1Fac name: PUMPFacinv typ: 262572Id: 306.2Acres serv: LANLu code: THE CLUB AT MEDITERRAProject na:INDActual per: 140523-7App no:11-03361-WPermit no: H43 WNW 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000047827FL WELLS FLSO80000047828Site id: INDFee catego:John RandallDisplay na: Off-site Lake(s)Source nam: IRRFactypwu c: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC5140197.2s Page A-36 EFacwlsts c:PRMUsests cod: 0Cased dept: 0Well depth: 716836Pump coo 1: 404534Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 16Pump int 1: 0Pump intak: 900Pump capac: 0Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 8Pump diame: CENPumptype c: SW-4Fac name: PUMPFacinv typ: 262601Id: 306.2Acres serv: LANLu code: THE CLUB AT MEDITERRAProject na:INDActual per: 140523-7App no:11-03361-WPermit no: H46 WNW 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000047830FL WELLS FLSO80000047831Site id: INDFee catego:John RandallDisplay na: Off-site Lake(s)Source nam: IRRFactypwu c: EFacwlsts c:PRMUsests cod: 0Cased dept: 0Well depth: 716836Pump coo 1: 404534Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 16Pump int 1: 0Pump intak: 900Pump capac: 0Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 8Pump diame: CENPumptype c: SW-5Fac name: PUMPFacinv typ: 262602Id: 306.2Acres serv: LANLu code: THE CLUB AT MEDITERRAProject na:INDActual per: 140523-7App no:11-03361-WPermit no: H45 WNW 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000047831FL WELLS FLSO80000047832Site id: INDFee catego:John RandallDisplay na: Off-site Lake(s)Source nam: IRRFactypwu c: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC5140197.2s Page A-37 PFacwlsts c:PRMUsests cod: 80Cased dept: 100Well depth: 714470Pump coo 1: 404307Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 0Pump int 1: 60Pump intak: 20Pump capac: 4Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 0Pump diame: SUBPumptype c: WELL #1Fac name: WELLFacinv typ: 135650Id: 14.07Acres serv: LANLu code: NORTH NAPLES MIDDLE SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION TRAProject na:GPActual per: 030721-3App no:11-02112-WPermit no: 48 WSW 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000051623FL WELLS FLSO80000056643Site id: GP MINFee catego:Michael Taylor, P.G.Display na: On-site Lake(s)Source nam: IRRFactypwu c: EFacwlsts c:PNCUsests cod: 0Cased dept: 0Well depth: 713319Pump coo 1: 405057Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 0Pump int 1: 0Pump intak: 0Pump capac: 0Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 6Pump diame: CENPumptype c: Pump 5Fac name: PUMPFacinv typ: 135852Id: 3.33Acres serv: LANLu code: ROYAL PALM ACADEMYProject na:GPActual per: 120917-2App no:11-01887-WPermit no: 47 SW 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000056643FL WELLS FLSO80000047830Site id: INDFee catego:John RandallDisplay na: Off-site Lake(s)Source nam: IRRFactypwu c: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC5140197.2s Page A-38 EFacwlsts c:PRMUsests cod: 65Cased dept: 100Well depth: 717327Pump coo 1: 404691Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 0Pump int 1: 45Pump intak: 500Pump capac: 8Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 0Pump diame: SUBPumptype c: LT-1Fac name: WELLFacinv typ: 262549Id: 306.2Acres serv: LANLu code: THE CLUB AT MEDITERRAProject na:INDActual per: 140523-7App no:11-03361-WPermit no: K50 NW 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000047823FL WELLS FLSO80000032470Site id: GP MINFee catego:Michael Taylor, P.G.Display na: Mid-Hawthorn AquiferSource nam: IRRFactypwu c: EFacwlsts c:TBPAUsests cod: 305Cased dept: 280Well depth: 716181Pump coo 1: 404236Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 0Pump int 1: 15Pump intak: 0Pump capac: 6Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 0Pump diame: SUBPumptype c: PW-2Fac name: WELLFacinv typ: 259060Id: 12.39Acres serv: LANLu code: SANDALWOOD PROJECTProject na:GPActual per: 110624-11App no:11-03232-WPermit no: J49 WNW 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000032470FL WELLS FLSO80000051623Site id: GP MINFee catego:Kimberly ArnoldDisplay na: Lower Tamiami AquiferSource nam: PWSFactypwu c: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC5140197.2s Page A-39 EFacwlsts c:PNCUsests cod: 20Cased dept: 40Well depth: 712438Pump coo 1: 406015Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 0Pump int 1: 0Pump intak: 0Pump capac: 8Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 0Pump diame: CENPumptype c: Well 2Fac name: WELLFacinv typ: 135397Id: 3.33Acres serv: LANLu code: ROYAL PALM ACADEMYProject na:GPActual per: 120917-2App no:11-01887-WPermit no: L52 SSW 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000056628FL WELLS FLSO80000046223Site id: INDFee catego:Nexhip Maska, P.G.Display na: Lower Tamiami AquiferSource nam: IRLFactypwu c: PFacwlsts c:PRMUsests cod: 65Cased dept: 100Well depth: 717852Pump coo 1: 409236Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 0Pump int 1: 0Pump intak: 1000Pump capac: 12Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 0Pump diame: SUBPumptype c: South WellFac name: WELLFacinv typ: 267502Id: 222.62Acres serv: GOLLu code: TALIS PARKProject na:GPActual per: 140701-8App no:11-00151-WPermit no: 51 NE 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000046223FL WELLS FLSO80000047823Site id: INDFee catego:John RandallDisplay na: Lower Tamiami AquiferSource nam: IRLFactypwu c: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC5140197.2s Page A-40 PFacwlsts c:PRMUsests cod: 30Cased dept: 40Well depth: 712647.76Pump coo 1: 405496.84Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 0Pump int 1: 38Pump intak: 150Pump capac: 6Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 0Pump diame: SUBPumptype c: IW-1Fac name: WELLFacinv typ: 268049Id: 4.3Acres serv: LANLu code: MARSILEA VILLASProject na:GPActual per: 140204-11App no:11-03526-WPermit no: M54 SSW 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000023247FL WELLS FLSO80000032469Site id: GP MINFee catego:Michael Taylor, P.G.Display na: Water Table AquiferSource nam: IRRFactypwu c: EFacwlsts c:STDUsests cod: 26Cased dept: 31Well depth: 716164Pump coo 1: 404002Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 0Pump int 1: 15Pump intak: 250Pump capac: 6Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 0Pump diame: SUBPumptype c: PW-1Fac name: WELLFacinv typ: 259059Id: 12.39Acres serv: LANLu code: SANDALWOOD PROJECTProject na:GPActual per: 110624-11App no:11-03232-WPermit no: J53 WNW 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000032469FL WELLS FLSO80000056628Site id: GP MINFee catego:Michael Taylor, P.G.Display na: Water Table AquiferSource nam: IRLFactypwu c: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC5140197.2s Page A-41 EFacwlsts c:PRMUsests cod: 14Cased dept: 30Well depth: 714372Pump coo 1: 410249Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 0Pump int 1: 13Pump intak: 50Pump capac: 6Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 0Pump diame: SUBPumptype c: WT-1Fac name: WELLFacinv typ: 252511Id: 40.04Acres serv: LANLu code: THE STRAND MASTER PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATProject na:GPActual per: 140529-22App no:11-03069-WPermit no: N56 ESE 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower FLSO80000025507FL WELLS FLSO80000023248Site id: GP MINFee catego:Louis Bustamante, P.G.Display na: On-site Lake(s)/Pond(s)Source nam: IRRFactypwu c: PFacwlsts c:PRMUsests cod: 30Cased dept: 40Well depth: 712647.76Pump coo 1: 405496.84Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 5Pump int 1: 38Pump intak: 150Pump capac: 6Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 6Pump diame: CENPumptype c: SWP-1Fac name: PUMPFacinv typ: 268050Id: 4.3Acres serv: LANLu code: MARSILEA VILLASProject na:GPActual per: 140204-11App no:11-03526-WPermit no: M55 SSW 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000023248FL WELLS FLSO80000023247Site id: GP MINFee catego:Louis Bustamante, P.G.Display na: Water Table AquiferSource nam: IRLFactypwu c: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC5140197.2s Page A-42 EFacwlsts c:SECUsests cod: 0Cased dept: 0Well depth: 714322Pump coo 1: 410274Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 0Pump int 1: 0Pump intak: 100Pump capac: 0Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 6Pump diame: SUBPumptype c: SP-9BFac name: PUMPFacinv typ: 252937Id: 40.04Acres serv: LANLu code: THE STRAND MASTER PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATProject na:GPActual per: 140529-22App no:11-03069-WPermit no: N58 ESE 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower FLSO80000025513FL WELLS FLSO80000025120Site id: GP MAJFee catego:Paulette M. Glebocki, P.G.Display na: On-site Lake(s)Source nam: IRRFactypwu c: EFacwlsts c:PRMUsests cod: 0Cased dept: 0Well depth: 714364Pump coo 1: 410247Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 0Pump int 1: 0Pump intak: 100Pump capac: 0Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 6Pump diame: SUBPumptype c: SP-9AFac name: PUMPFacinv typ: 252488Id: 40.04Acres serv: LANLu code: THE STRAND MASTER PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATProject na:GPActual per: 140529-22App no:11-03069-WPermit no: N57 ESE 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower FLSO80000025120FL WELLS FLSO80000025507Site id: GP MAJFee catego:Paulette M. Glebocki, P.G.Display na: Water Table AquiferSource nam: IRLFactypwu c: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC5140197.2s Page A-43 EFacwlsts c:STDUsests cod: 20Cased dept: 40Well depth: 716965Pump coo 1: 410116Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 0Pump int 1: 18.2Pump intak: 500Pump capac: 10Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 0Pump diame: SUBPumptype c: PW-5Fac name: WELLFacinv typ: 133623Id: 222.62Acres serv: GOLLu code: TALIS PARKProject na:GPActual per: 140701-8App no:11-00151-WPermit no: 60 ENE 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower FLSO80000046047FL WELLS FLSO80000056640Site id: GP MINFee catego:Michael Taylor, P.G.Display na: On-site Lake(s)Source nam: IRRFactypwu c: EFacwlsts c:PNCUsests cod: 0Cased dept: 0Well depth: 712336Pump coo 1: 406000Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 0Pump int 1: 0Pump intak: 0Pump capac: 0Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 6Pump diame: CENPumptype c: Pump 4Fac name: PUMPFacinv typ: 135837Id: 3.33Acres serv: LANLu code: ROYAL PALM ACADEMYProject na:GPActual per: 120917-2App no:11-01887-WPermit no: L59 SSW 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000056640FL WELLS FLSO80000025513Site id: GP MAJFee catego:Paulette M. Glebocki, P.G.Display na: On-site Lake(s)Source nam: IRRFactypwu c: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC5140197.2s Page A-44 EFacwlsts c:PRMUsests cod: 120Cased dept: 160Well depth: 714357Pump coo 1: 410379Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 0Pump int 1: 80Pump intak: 100Pump capac: 6Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 0Pump diame: SUBPumptype c: SS-2Fac name: WELLFacinv typ: 252515Id: 40.04Acres serv: LANLu code: THE STRAND MASTER PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATProject na:GPActual per: 140529-22App no:11-03069-WPermit no: N62 ESE 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower FLSO80000025510FL WELLS FLSO80000024341Site id: INDFee catego:Andrew SteinerDisplay na: Water Table AquiferSource nam: IRLFactypwu c: EFacwlsts c:PRMUsests cod: 20Cased dept: 30Well depth: 717485Pump coo 1: 404459Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 0Pump int 1: -10Pump intak: 450Pump capac: 10Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 0Pump diame: SUBPumptype c: 1Fac name: WELLFacinv typ: 31755Id: 678Acres serv: LANLu code: MEDITERRAProject na:INDActual per: 130227-7App no:11-00171-WPermit no: O61 NW 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000024341FL WELLS FLSO80000046047Site id: INDFee catego:Nexhip Maska, P.G.Display na: Water Table AquiferSource nam: IRLFactypwu c: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC5140197.2s Page A-45 EFacwlsts c:PRMUsests cod: 0Cased dept: 0Well depth: 716998Pump coo 1: 404060Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 16Pump int 1: 0Pump intak: 1500Pump capac: 0Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 10Pump diame: CENPumptype c: 9983A-B02-4271 KFac name: PUMPFacinv typ: 114573Id: 678Acres serv: LANLu code: MEDITERRAProject na:INDActual per: 130227-7App no:11-00171-WPermit no: P64 WNW 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000024348FL WELLS FLSO80000024342Site id: INDFee catego:Andrew SteinerDisplay na: Water Table AquiferSource nam: IRLFactypwu c: EFacwlsts c:PRMUsests cod: 20Cased dept: 30Well depth: 717176Pump coo 1: 404169Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 0Pump int 1: -10Pump intak: 450Pump capac: 10Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 0Pump diame: SUBPumptype c: 2Fac name: WELLFacinv typ: 31756Id: 678Acres serv: LANLu code: MEDITERRAProject na:INDActual per: 130227-7App no:11-00171-WPermit no: O63 WNW 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000024342FL WELLS FLSO80000025510Site id: GP MAJFee catego:Paulette M. Glebocki, P.G.Display na: Sandstone AquiferSource nam: IRLFactypwu c: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC5140197.2s Page A-46 EFacwlsts c:PRMUsests cod: 0Cased dept: 0Well depth: 716998Pump coo 1: 404060Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 16Pump int 1: 0Pump intak: 500Pump capac: 0Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 8Pump diame: CENPumptype c: D02-S308A-M-31Fac name: PUMPFacinv typ: 114575Id: 678Acres serv: LANLu code: MEDITERRAProject na:INDActual per: 130227-7App no:11-00171-WPermit no: P66 WNW 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000024350FL WELLS FLSO80000024347Site id: INDFee catego:Andrew SteinerDisplay na: On-site Lake(s)/Pond(s)Source nam: IRRFactypwu c: EFacwlsts c:PRMUsests cod: 0Cased dept: 0Well depth: 716998Pump coo 1: 404060Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 16Pump int 1: 0Pump intak: 1500Pump capac: 0Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 10Pump diame: CENPumptype c: 5KE-404-DTT-6008Fac name: PUMPFacinv typ: 114572Id: 678Acres serv: LANLu code: MEDITERRAProject na:INDActual per: 130227-7App no:11-00171-WPermit no: P65 WNW 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000024347FL WELLS FLSO80000024348Site id: INDFee catego:Andrew SteinerDisplay na: On-site Lake(s)/Pond(s)Source nam: IRRFactypwu c: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC5140197.2s Page A-47 PFacwlsts c:PRMUsests cod: 80Cased dept: 120Well depth: 712238Pump coo 1: 408536Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 0Pump int 1: 70Pump intak: 54Pump capac: 4Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 0Pump diame: SUBPumptype c: Supply WellFac name: WELLFacinv typ: 260703Id: .5Acres serv: INDLu code: MILANO RECREATION-SWIMMING POOL HEATINGProject na:GPActual per: 111101-5App no:11-03296-WPermit no: Q68 SSE 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000031436FL WELLS FLSO80000024349Site id: INDFee catego:Andrew SteinerDisplay na: On-site Lake(s)/Pond(s)Source nam: IRRFactypwu c: EFacwlsts c:PRMUsests cod: 0Cased dept: 0Well depth: 716998Pump coo 1: 404060Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 16Pump int 1: 0Pump intak: 1500Pump capac: 0Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 10Pump diame: CENPumptype c: D03-01054441-004E-B-02Fac name: PUMPFacinv typ: 114574Id: 678Acres serv: LANLu code: MEDITERRAProject na:INDActual per: 130227-7App no:11-00171-WPermit no: P67 WNW 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000024349FL WELLS FLSO80000024350Site id: INDFee catego:Andrew SteinerDisplay na: On-site Lake(s)/Pond(s)Source nam: IRRFactypwu c: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC5140197.2s Page A-48 PFacwlsts c:PRMUsests cod: 80Cased dept: 120Well depth: 712112Pump coo 1: 408461Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 0Pump int 1: 70Pump intak: 54Pump capac: 4Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 0Pump diame: SUBPumptype c: Injection WellFac name: WELLFacinv typ: 260704Id: .5Acres serv: INDLu code: MILANO RECREATION-SWIMMING POOL HEATINGProject na:GPActual per: 111101-5App no:11-03296-WPermit no: Q70 SSE 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000031608FL WELLS FLSO80000025512Site id: GP MAJFee catego:Paulette M. Glebocki, P.G.Display na: On-site Lake(s)Source nam: IRRFactypwu c: EFacwlsts c:PRMUsests cod: 0Cased dept: 0Well depth: 715129Pump coo 1: 410690Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 0Pump int 1: 0Pump intak: 80Pump capac: 0Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 4Pump diame: SUBPumptype c: SP-15Fac name: PUMPFacinv typ: 252935Id: 40.04Acres serv: LANLu code: THE STRAND MASTER PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATProject na:GPActual per: 140529-22App no:11-03069-WPermit no: 69 East 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower FLSO80000025512FL WELLS FLSO80000031436Site id: GP MINFee catego:Nexhip Maska, P.G.Display na: Lower Tamiami AquiferSource nam: PHFactypwu c: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC5140197.2s Page A-49 EFacwlsts c:PRMUsests cod: 0Cased dept: 0Well depth: 711830Pump coo 1: 408019Pump coord: 0Invert ele: -7Pump int 1: 0Pump intak: 750Pump capac: 0Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 6Pump diame: CENPumptype c: SWP-2Fac name: PUMPFacinv typ: 163928Id: 16.4Acres serv: LANLu code: MILANOProject na:GPActual per: 100128-10App no:11-02326-WPermit no: R72 SSE 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower FLSO80000013156FL WELLS FLSO80000042533Site id: GP MINFee catego:John RandallDisplay na: Water Table AquiferSource nam: IRRFactypwu c: PFacwlsts c:PRMUsests cod: 25Cased dept: 45Well depth: 712117Pump coo 1: 405591Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 0Pump int 1: 25Pump intak: 50Pump capac: 4Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 0Pump diame: SUBPumptype c: Well 7Fac name: WELLFacinv typ: 103508Id: 8.78Acres serv: LANLu code: IMPERIAL GOLF ESTATES INC H O AProject na:GPActual per: 080821-13App no:11-01881-WPermit no: 71 SSW 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000042533FL WELLS FLSO80000031608Site id: GP MINFee catego:Nexhip Maska, P.G.Display na: Lower Tamiami AquiferSource nam: PHRFactypwu c: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC5140197.2s Page A-50 EFacwlsts c:PRMUsests cod: 0Cased dept: 0Well depth: 719207Pump coo 1: 407640Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 16Pump int 1: 0Pump intak: 1500Pump capac: 0Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 10Pump diame: CENPumptype c: H09-20003697-GT-01Fac name: PUMPFacinv typ: 213435Id: 678Acres serv: LANLu code: MEDITERRAProject na:INDActual per: 130227-7App no:11-00171-WPermit no: S74 North 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000024541FL WELLS FLSO80000024351Site id: INDFee catego:Andrew SteinerDisplay na: On-site Lake(s)/Pond(s)Source nam: IRRFactypwu c: EFacwlsts c:PRMUsests cod: 0Cased dept: 0Well depth: 719207Pump coo 1: 407630Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 16Pump int 1: 0Pump intak: 1500Pump capac: 0Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 10Pump diame: CENPumptype c: H09-20003697-GT-02Fac name: PUMPFacinv typ: 213434Id: 678Acres serv: LANLu code: MEDITERRAProject na:INDActual per: 130227-7App no:11-00171-WPermit no: S73 North 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000024351FL WELLS FLSO80000013156Site id: GP MINFee catego:John RandallDisplay na: On-site Lake(s)Source nam: IRRFactypwu c: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC5140197.2s Page A-51 EFacwlsts c:PRMUsests cod: 145Cased dept: 175Well depth: 712429Pump coo 1: 409527Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 0Pump int 1: 60Pump intak: 90Pump capac: 4Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 0Pump diame: SUBPumptype c: Well 1Fac name: WELLFacinv typ: 195169Id: 1.86Acres serv: LANLu code: TURNBERRY WOODSProject na:GPActual per: 061018-7App no:11-02640-WPermit no: 76 SE 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower FLSO80000028857FL WELLS FLSO80000056644Site id: GP MINFee catego:Michael Taylor, P.G.Display na: On-site Lake(s)Source nam: IRRFactypwu c: PFacwlsts c:PNCUsests cod: 0Cased dept: 0Well depth: 711758Pump coo 1: 408104Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 0Pump int 1: 0Pump intak: 0Pump capac: 0Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 6Pump diame: CENPumptype c: Pump 2Fac name: PUMPFacinv typ: 135857Id: 3.33Acres serv: LANLu code: ROYAL PALM ACADEMYProject na:GPActual per: 120917-2App no:11-01887-WPermit no: R75 SSE 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower FLSO80000056644FL WELLS FLSO80000024541Site id: INDFee catego:Andrew SteinerDisplay na: On-site Lake(s)/Pond(s)Source nam: IRRFactypwu c: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC5140197.2s Page A-52 EFacwlsts c:PRMUsests cod: 0Cased dept: 0Well depth: 715594Pump coo 1: 411213Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 0Pump int 1: 0Pump intak: 160Pump capac: 0Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 4Pump diame: SUBPumptype c: SP-14Fac name: PUMPFacinv typ: 252493Id: 40.04Acres serv: LANLu code: THE STRAND MASTER PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATProject na:GPActual per: 140529-22App no:11-03069-WPermit no: 78 East 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000025506FL WELLS FLSO80000042534Site id: GP MINFee catego:John RandallDisplay na: Water Table AquiferSource nam: IRRFactypwu c: PFacwlsts c:PRMUsests cod: 25Cased dept: 45Well depth: 713468Pump coo 1: 403646Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 0Pump int 1: 25Pump intak: 50Pump capac: 4Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 0Pump diame: SUBPumptype c: Well 8Fac name: WELLFacinv typ: 103509Id: 8.78Acres serv: LANLu code: IMPERIAL GOLF ESTATES INC H O AProject na:GPActual per: 080821-13App no:11-01881-WPermit no: 77 WSW 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000042534FL WELLS FLSO80000028857Site id: GP MINFee catego:Karen GrissomDisplay na: Sandstone AquiferSource nam: IRRFactypwu c: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC5140197.2s Page A-53 EFacwlsts c:PRMUsests cod: 0Cased dept: 0Well depth: 714609Pump coo 1: 411256Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 0Pump int 1: 0Pump intak: 100Pump capac: 0Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 6Pump diame: SUBPumptype c: SP-11AFac name: PUMPFacinv typ: 252490Id: 40.04Acres serv: LANLu code: THE STRAND MASTER PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATProject na:GPActual per: 140529-22App no:11-03069-WPermit no: T80 East 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000025121FL WELLS FLSO80000013154Site id: GP MINFee catego:John RandallDisplay na: Water Table AquiferSource nam: IRRFactypwu c: EFacwlsts c:PRMUsests cod: 19Cased dept: 40Well depth: 711508Pump coo 1: 408551Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 0Pump int 1: 17Pump intak: 480Pump capac: 8Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 0Pump diame: SUBPumptype c: WT-1Fac name: WELLFacinv typ: 160821Id: 16.4Acres serv: LANLu code: MILANOProject na:GPActual per: 100128-10App no:11-02326-WPermit no: 79 SSE 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower FLSO80000013154FL WELLS FLSO80000025506Site id: GP MAJFee catego:Paulette M. Glebocki, P.G.Display na: On-site Lake(s)Source nam: IRRFactypwu c: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC5140197.2s Page A-54 EFacwlsts c:RCHUsests cod: 19Cased dept: 22Well depth: 718815Pump coo 1: 404500Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 0Pump int 1: 18Pump intak: 500Pump capac: 12Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 0Pump diame: SUBPumptype c: WT-3Fac name: WELLFacinv typ: 262551Id: 306.2Acres serv: LANLu code: THE CLUB AT MEDITERRAProject na:INDActual per: 140523-7App no:11-03361-WPermit no: U82 NW 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000047825FL WELLS FLSO80000025515Site id: GP MAJFee catego:Paulette M. Glebocki, P.G.Display na: On-site Lake(s)Source nam: IRRFactypwu c: EFacwlsts c:SECUsests cod: 0Cased dept: 0Well depth: 714530Pump coo 1: 411274Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 0Pump int 1: 0Pump intak: 150Pump capac: 0Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 6Pump diame: SUBPumptype c: SP-11BFac name: PUMPFacinv typ: 268611Id: 40.04Acres serv: LANLu code: THE STRAND MASTER PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATProject na:GPActual per: 140529-22App no:11-03069-WPermit no: T81 ESE 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000025515FL WELLS FLSO80000025121Site id: GP MAJFee catego:Paulette M. Glebocki, P.G.Display na: On-site Lake(s)Source nam: IRRFactypwu c: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC5140197.2s Page A-55 PFacwlsts c:PNCUsests cod: 0Cased dept: 0Well depth: 711167Pump coo 1: 408134Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 0Pump int 1: 0Pump intak: 0Pump capac: 0Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 24Pump diame: CENPumptype c: Pump 1Fac name: PUMPFacinv typ: 135845Id: 3.33Acres serv: LANLu code: ROYAL PALM ACADEMYProject na:GPActual per: 120917-2App no:11-01887-WPermit no: V84 SSE 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower FLSO80000056641FL WELLS FLSO80000013155Site id: GP MINFee catego:John RandallDisplay na: On-site Lake(s)Source nam: IRRFactypwu c: EFacwlsts c:PRMUsests cod: 0Cased dept: 0Well depth: 711222Pump coo 1: 408155Pump coord: 0Invert ele: -7Pump int 1: 0Pump intak: 750Pump capac: 0Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 24Pump diame: CENPumptype c: SWP-1Fac name: PUMPFacinv typ: 163927Id: 16.4Acres serv: LANLu code: MILANOProject na:GPActual per: 100128-10App no:11-02326-WPermit no: V83 SSE 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower FLSO80000013155FL WELLS FLSO80000047825Site id: INDFee catego:John RandallDisplay na: Water Table AquiferSource nam: IRLFactypwu c: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC5140197.2s Page A-56 EFacwlsts c:PRMUsests cod: 0Cased dept: 0Well depth: 719207Pump coo 1: 404650Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 16Pump int 1: 0Pump intak: 400Pump capac: 0Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 8Pump diame: CENPumptype c: H09-20003699-GT-01Fac name: PUMPFacinv typ: 213436Id: 678Acres serv: LANLu code: MEDITERRAProject na:INDActual per: 130227-7App no:11-00171-WPermit no: U86 NW 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000024352FL WELLS FLSO80000042529Site id: GP MINFee catego:John RandallDisplay na: Water Table AquiferSource nam: IRRFactypwu c: PFacwlsts c:PRMUsests cod: 25Cased dept: 45Well depth: 715630Pump coo 1: 402673Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 0Pump int 1: 25Pump intak: 50Pump capac: 4Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 0Pump diame: SUBPumptype c: Well 4Fac name: WELLFacinv typ: 103505Id: 8.78Acres serv: LANLu code: IMPERIAL GOLF ESTATES INC H O AProject na:GPActual per: 080821-13App no:11-01881-WPermit no: 85 West 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000042529FL WELLS FLSO80000056641Site id: GP MINFee catego:Michael Taylor, P.G.Display na: On-site Lake(s)Source nam: IRRFactypwu c: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC5140197.2s Page A-57 EFacwlsts c:SECUsests cod: 0Cased dept: 0Well depth: 715579Pump coo 1: 411837Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 0Pump int 1: 0Pump intak: 160Pump capac: 0Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 4Pump diame: SUBPumptype c: SP-13Fac name: PUMPFacinv typ: 252492Id: 40.04Acres serv: LANLu code: THE STRAND MASTER PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATProject na:GPActual per: 140529-22App no:11-03069-WPermit no: 88 East 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000025505FL WELLS FLSO80000025118Site id: GP MAJFee catego:Paulette M. Glebocki, P.G.Display na: On-site Lake(s)Source nam: IRRFactypwu c: EFacwlsts c:PRMUsests cod: 0Cased dept: 0Well depth: 713499Pump coo 1: 411372Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 0Pump int 1: 0Pump intak: 100Pump capac: 0Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 4Pump diame: SUBPumptype c: SP-3Fac name: PUMPFacinv typ: 252481Id: 40.04Acres serv: LANLu code: THE STRAND MASTER PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATProject na:GPActual per: 140529-22App no:11-03069-WPermit no: 87 ESE 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000025118FL WELLS FLSO80000024352Site id: INDFee catego:Andrew SteinerDisplay na: On-site Lake(s)/Pond(s)Source nam: IRRFactypwu c: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC5140197.2s Page A-58 EFacwlsts c:PRMUsests cod: 14Cased dept: 38Well depth: 720306Pump coo 1: 405908Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 0Pump int 1: -5Pump intak: 750Pump capac: 12Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 0Pump diame: VETPumptype c: 4Fac name: WELLFacinv typ: 103725Id: 678Acres serv: LANLu code: MEDITERRAProject na:INDActual per: 130227-7App no:11-00171-WPermit no: 90 NNW 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000024345FL WELLS FLSO80000025122Site id: GP MAJFee catego:Paulette M. Glebocki, P.G.Display na: On-site Lake(s)Source nam: IRRFactypwu c: EFacwlsts c:PRMUsests cod: 0Cased dept: 0Well depth: 714994Pump coo 1: 412103Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 0Pump int 1: 0Pump intak: 80Pump capac: 0Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 6Pump diame: SUBPumptype c: SP-12Fac name: PUMPFacinv typ: 252491Id: 40.04Acres serv: LANLu code: THE STRAND MASTER PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATProject na:GPActual per: 140529-22App no:11-03069-WPermit no: 89 East 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000025122FL WELLS FLSO80000025505Site id: GP MAJFee catego:Paulette M. Glebocki, P.G.Display na: On-site Lake(s)Source nam: IRRFactypwu c: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC5140197.2s Page A-59 PFacwlsts c:PRMUsests cod: 65Cased dept: 100Well depth: 720216Pump coo 1: 409137Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 0Pump int 1: 0Pump intak: 1000Pump capac: 12Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 0Pump diame: SUBPumptype c: North WellFac name: WELLFacinv typ: 267501Id: 222.62Acres serv: GOLLu code: TALIS PARKProject na:GPActual per: 140701-8App no:11-00151-WPermit no: W92 NNE 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000046222FL WELLS FLSO80000025504Site id: GP MAJFee catego:Paulette M. Glebocki, P.G.Display na: On-site Lake(s)Source nam: IRRFactypwu c: EFacwlsts c:PRMUsests cod: 0Cased dept: 0Well depth: 714132Pump coo 1: 412100Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 0Pump int 1: 0Pump intak: 100Pump capac: 0Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 4Pump diame: SUBPumptype c: SP-10Fac name: PUMPFacinv typ: 252489Id: 40.04Acres serv: LANLu code: THE STRAND MASTER PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATProject na:GPActual per: 140529-22App no:11-03069-WPermit no: 91 ESE 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000025504FL WELLS FLSO80000024345Site id: INDFee catego:Andrew SteinerDisplay na: Water Table AquiferSource nam: IRLFactypwu c: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC5140197.2s Page A-60 Tamiami FormationFormation type: Intermediate aquifer systemAquifername: USCountrycode:Not ReportedVert coord refsys: Not ReportedVertcollection method: Not ReportedVert accmeasure units: Not ReportedVertacc measure val:Not ReportedVert measure units: Not ReportedVert measure val:NAD83Horiz coord refsys: Global positioning system (GPS), uncorrectedHoriz Collection method: secondsHoriz Acc measure units:.1Horiz Acc measure: Not ReportedSourcemap scale:-81.7537222Longitude: 26.28675Latitude:Not ReportedContrib drainagearea units: Not ReportedContrib drainagearea:Not ReportedDrainagearea Units: Not ReportedDrainagearea value:03090204Huc code: Not ReportedMonloc desc: WellMonloc type: C -1216Monloc name: USGS-261712081451301Monloc Identifier: USGS Florida Water Science CenterFormal name: USGS-FLOrg. Identifier: X94 SSE 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower USGS40000236032FED USGS FLSO80000046046Site id: INDFee catego:Nexhip Maska, P.G.Display na: Water Table AquiferSource nam: IRLFactypwu c: EFacwlsts c:STDUsests cod: 22Cased dept: 42Well depth: 720220Pump coo 1: 409151Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 0Pump int 1: 16.5Pump intak: 500Pump capac: 10Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 0Pump diame: SUBPumptype c: PW-6Fac name: WELLFacinv typ: 133617Id: 222.62Acres serv: GOLLu code: TALIS PARKProject na:GPActual per: 140701-8App no:11-00151-WPermit no: W93 NNE 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000046046FL WELLS FLSO80000046222Site id: INDFee catego:Nexhip Maska, P.G.Display na: Lower Tamiami AquiferSource nam: IRLFactypwu c: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC5140197.2s Page A-61 AFacwlsts c:TBPAUsests cod: 14Cased dept: 19Well depth: 710599Pump coo 1: 409189Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 0Pump int 1: 0Pump intak: 0Pump capac: 2Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 0Pump diame: N/APumptype c: CO-19Fac name: WELLFacinv typ: 144240Id: 5759Acres serv: PWSLu code: PELICAN BAY/MULE PEN WELLFIELDSProject na:INDActual per: 140811-4App no:11-00052-WPermit no: X96 SSE 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower FLSO80000046916FL WELLS FLSO80000027391Site id: INDFee catego:Toby SchwetjeDisplay na: Water Table AquiferSource nam: MONFactypwu c: AFacwlsts c:TBPAUsests cod: 14Cased dept: 19Well depth: 710599Pump coo 1: 409189Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 0Pump int 1: 0Pump intak: 0Pump capac: 2Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 0Pump diame: N/APumptype c: CO-19Fac name: WELLFacinv typ: 144240Id: 5759Acres serv: PWSLu code: PELICAN BAY/MULE PEN WELLFIELDSProject na:INDActual per: 140722-7App no:11-00052-WPermit no: X95 SSE 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower FLSO80000027391FL WELLS Ground-water levels, Number of Measurements: 0 Not ReportedWellholedepth units: Not ReportedWellholedepth:ftWelldepth units: 90Welldepth:Not ReportedConstruction date: Not ReportedAquifer type: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC5140197.2s Page A-62 AFacwlsts c:TBPAUsests cod: 51Cased dept: 90Well depth: 710618Pump coo 1: 409245Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 0Pump int 1: 0Pump intak: 0Pump capac: 4Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 0Pump diame: N/APumptype c: CO-18Fac name: WELLFacinv typ: 144239Id: 5759Acres serv: PWSLu code: PELICAN BAY/MULE PEN WELLFIELDSProject na:INDActual per: 140811-4App no:11-00052-WPermit no: X98 SSE 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower FLSO80000046915FL WELLS FLSO80000027390Site id: INDFee catego:Toby SchwetjeDisplay na: Lower Tamiami AquiferSource nam: MONFactypwu c: AFacwlsts c:TBPAUsests cod: 51Cased dept: 90Well depth: 710618Pump coo 1: 409245Pump coord: 0Invert ele: 0Pump int 1: 0Pump intak: 0Pump capac: 4Well diame: 0Cul diamet: 0Pump diame: N/APumptype c: CO-18Fac name: WELLFacinv typ: 144239Id: 5759Acres serv: PWSLu code: PELICAN BAY/MULE PEN WELLFIELDSProject na:INDActual per: 140722-7App no:11-00052-WPermit no: X97 SSE 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower FLSO80000027390FL WELLS FLSO80000046916Site id: INDFee catego:Paulette M. Glebocki, P.G.Display na: Water Table AquiferSource nam: MONFactypwu c: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC5140197.2s Page A-63 FLSO80000046915Site id: INDFee catego:Paulette M. Glebocki, P.G.Display na: Lower Tamiami AquiferSource nam: MONFactypwu c: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC5140197.2s Page A-64 Not Reported : Zone 3 indoor average level < 2 pCi/L. : Zone 2 indoor average level >= 2 pCi/L and <= 4 pCi/L. Note: Zone 1 indoor average level > 4 pCi/L. Federal EPA Radon Zone for COLLIER County: 3 Certified Residential Database18.43834110 ___________________________________________ Data Source% of sites>4pCi/LTotal BuildingsZip Radon Test Results State Database: FL Radon AREA RADON INFORMATION ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS RADON ® TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model (DEM) Source: United States Geologic Survey EDR acquired the USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model in 2002 and updated it in 2006. The 7.5 minute DEM corresponds to the USGS 1:24,000- and 1:25,000-scale topographic quadrangle maps. The DEM provides elevation data with consistent elevation units and projection. Current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map Source: U.S. Geological Survey HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION Flood Zone Data: This data was obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). It depicts 100-year and 500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. It includes the National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) which incorporates Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) data and Q3 data from FEMA in areas not covered by NFHL. Source: FEMA Telephone: 877-336-2627 Date of Government Version: 2003, 2015 NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. State Wetlands Data: Wetlands Inventory Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-245-8238 HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION AQUIFLOW Information SystemR Source: EDR proprietary database of groundwater flow information EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System (AIS) to provide data on the general direction of groundwater flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted to regulatory authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, hydrogeologically determined groundwater flow direction and depth to water table information. GEOLOGIC INFORMATION Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - A digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994). STATSGO: State Soil Geographic Database Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) leads the national Conservation Soil Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns in a landscape. Soil maps for STATSGO are compiled by generalizing more detailed (SSURGO) soil survey maps. SSURGO: Soil Survey Geographic Database Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Telephone: 800-672-5559 SSURGO is the most detailed level of mapping done by the Natural Resources Conservation Service, mapping scales generally range from 1:12,000 to 1:63,360. Field mapping methods using national standards are used to construct the soil maps in the Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database. SSURGO digitizing duplicates the original soil survey maps. This level of mapping is designed for use by landowners, townships and county natural resource planning and management. TC5140197.2s Page PSGR-1 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS FEDERAL WATER WELLS PWS: Public Water Systems Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water Telephone: 202-564-3750 Public Water System data from the Federal Reporting Data System. A PWS is any water system which provides water to at least 25 people for at least 60 days annually. PWSs provide water from wells, rivers and other sources. PWS ENF: Public Water Systems Violation and Enforcement Data Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water Telephone: 202-564-3750 Violation and Enforcement data for Public Water Systems from the Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) after August 1995. Prior to August 1995, the data came from the Federal Reporting Data System (FRDS). USGS Water Wells: USGS National Water Inventory System (NWIS) This database contains descriptive information on sites where the USGS collects or has collected data on surface water and/or groundwater. The groundwater data includes information on wells, springs, and other sources of groundwater. STATE RECORDS DEP GWIS - Generalized Water Information System Well Data Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-245-8507 Data collected for the Watershed Monitoring Section of the Department of Environmental Protection. DOH and DEP Historic Study of Private Wells Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-559-0901 Historic database for private supply wells. Well Construction Permitting Database Source: Northwest Florida Water Management District Telephone: 850-539-5999 Consumptive Use Permit Well Database Source: St. Johns River Water Management District Telephone: 386-329-4841 Permitted Well Location Database Source: South Florida Water Management District Telephone: 561-682-6877 Super Act Program Well Data This table consists of data relating to all privately and publicly owned potable wells investigated as part of the SUPER Act program. The Florida Department of Health’s SUPER Act Program (per Chapter 376.3071(4)(g), Florida Statutes), was given authority to provide field and laboratory services, toxicological risk assessments, investigations of drinking water contamination complaints and education of the public Source: Department of Health Telephone: 850-245-4250 Water Well Location Information Source: Suwannee River Water Management District Telephone: 386-796-7211 TC5140197.2s Page PSGR-2 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED Water Well Permit Database Source: Southwest Water Management District Telephone: 352-796-7211 OTHER STATE DATABASE INFORMATION Florida Sinkholes Source: Department of Environmental Protection, Geological Survey The sinkhole data was gathered by the Florida Sinkhole Research Institute, University of Florida. Oil and Gas Permit Database Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-245-3194 Locations of all permitted wells in the state of Florida. RADON State Database: FL Radon Source: Department of Health Telephone: 850-245-4288 Zip Code Based Radon Data Area Radon Information Source: USGS Telephone: 703-356-4020 The National Radon Database has been developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and is a compilation of the EPA/State Residential Radon Survey and the National Residential Radon Survey. The study covers the years 1986 - 1992. Where necessary data has been supplemented by information collected at private sources such as universities and research institutions. EPA Radon Zones Source: EPA Telephone: 703-356-4020 Sections 307 & 309 of IRAA directed EPA to list and identify areas of U.S. with the potential for elevated indoor radon levels. OTHER Airport Landing Facilities: Private and public use landing facilities Source: Federal Aviation Administration, 800-457-6656 Epicenters: World earthquake epicenters, Richter 5 or greater Source: Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Earthquake Fault Lines: The fault lines displayed on EDR’s Topographic map are digitized quaternary faultlines, prepared in 1975 by the United State Geological Survey STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION © 2015 TomTom North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material. TC5140197.2s Page PSGR-3 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED Florida Department of Environmental Protection Twin Towers Office Bldg. 2600 Blair Stone Road, Tallahassee, Florida, 32399-2400 Division of Waste Management Petroleum Storage Systems Storage Tank Facility Re-Inspection Site Inspection Report Facility Information: 9814442 C - Fuel user/Non-retail NORTH COLLIER FIRE CTRL & RESC DIST 16280 LIVINGSTON RD NAPLES, FL 34110 26° 17' 53.52'' 81° 45' 41.04'' DPHO County: COLLIER Inspection Date: 06/06/2017 # of Inspected ASTs: 1 USTs: 0 Mineral Acid Tanks: 0 Facility ID: Facility Type: Facility Name: Latitude: Longitude: LL Method: Inspection Result: Result:In Compliance Signatures: TKCOPC - COLLIER COUNTY SOLID & HAZ WASTE MGMT DEPT (239) 207-0920 Storage Tank Program Office and Phone Number Jay Standiford Inspector Name Inspector Signature Principal Inspector Collier County SHWMD Brian Englant Representative Name Representative Signature Maintenance North Collier Fire Owners of UST facilities are reminded that the Federal Energy Policy Act of 2005 and 40 CFR 280 Subpart J, requires Operator Training at all facilities by October 15, 2018. For further information please visit: http://www.dep.state.fl.us/waste/categories/tanks/pages/op_train.htm INSURANCE COMMERCE & INDUSTRY INSURANCE CO Financial Responsibility: Financial Responsibility: Insurance Carrier: Effective Date:Expiration Date:08/19/2016 08/19/2017 Activity Opened 06/06/2017 Jay StandifordPage 1 of 3 Facility ID: 9814442 To Be Completed System Tests Date Completed Results Reviewed Next Due Comment Date Type Annual Operability Test 06/06/2017 01/11/2018 Annual operability testing requird on all overfill prevention sevices and annually thereafter (includes fuel level sensors and fuel level clock gauges). Annual Operability Test 06/06/2017 06/06/2018 Required on the interstitial gauge annually Completed System Tests Date Completed Results Reviewed Next Due Comment Date Type Annual Operability Test 06/06/2017 Passed 06/06/2017 06/06/2018 Performed on the Krueger interstitial gauge (note manufacturer recommends annual operability testing be performed twice per year or every six months). Reviewed Records Record Category Record Type From Date To Date Reviewed Record Comment Two Years Monthly Maint. Visual Examinations and Results 12/17/2015 05/12/2017 Records are well maintained. 06/06/2017 Only Non-Compliance items were inspected during this TCR. A phone call was placed to verify non-compliance items were corrected. Site Visit Comments Activity Opened 06/06/2017 Jay StandifordPage 2 of 3 Facility ID: 9814442 The regular audible alarm was working but not the diesel audible alarm. AREA OF CONCERN: The diesel audible alarm was removed and will be fixed. Please provide assurances within 14 days of receipt of the report that the alarm will be fixed. Inspector: James (Jay) Standiford JayStandiford@colliergov.net Environmental Specialist Collier County SHWMD 3339 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 302 Naples, FL 34112 239-207-0981- Work Cell Inspection E-mailed to Brian England (benglant@northcollierfire.com) Inspection Photos 06/06/2017 2017-06-06 TCR Facility Pic Added Date Activity Opened 06/06/2017 Jay StandifordPage 3 of 3 APPENDIX E ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE AND INTERVIEWS “USER QUESTIONNAIRE” In order to qualify for one of the Landowner Liability Protections (LLPs)offered by the Small Business Liability Relief and Brownf ields Revitalization Act of 2001 (the “Brownfields Amendments”)the user must conduct the following inquiries required by 40 CFR 312.25,312.28,312.29, 312.30,and 312.31. These inquires must also be conducted by EPA Brownf ield Assessment and Characterization grantees. The user should provide the following information to the environmental professional.Failure to conduct these inquiries could result in a determination that “all appropriate inquiries”is not complete. Subject Property:Livingston Assemblage –13 Vacant-Wooded Parcels of real Estate Livingston Road and Veteran Memorial Blvd. Naples,FL (1.)Environmental liens that are filed or recorded against the property. Did a search of recorded land title records (or judicial records where appropriate)identif y any environmental liens filed or recorded against the property under federal,tribal,state,or local law? (2.)Activity and use limitations that are in place on the property or that have been filed or recorded against the property? Did a search of recorded land title records (or judicial records where appropriate)identif y any AULs, such as engineering controls,land use restrictions,or institutional controls that are in place at the property and/or have been filed or recorded against the property under federal,tribal, state, or local law? (3.)Specialized knowledge or experience of the person seeking to qualify for the LLP. Do you have any specialized knowledge or experience related to the property or nearby properties? For example, are you involved in the same line of business as the current or former occupants of the property or an adjoining property so that you would have specialized knowledge of the chemicals and processes used by this type of business? (4.)Relationship of the purchase price to the fair market value of the property if it were not contaminated. Does the purchase price being paid for this property reasonably reflect the fair market value of the property?If you conclude that there is a difference,have you considered whether the lower purchase price is because contamination is known or believed to be present at the property? (5.)Commonly known or reasonable ascertainable information about the property. Are you aware of commonly known or reasonably ascertainable information about the property that would help the environmental professional to identify conditions indicative of releases or threatened releases?For example, (a)Do you know the past uses of the property? (b)Do you know of specific chemicals that are present or once present at the property? (c)Do you know of spills or other chemical releases that have taken place at the property? (d)Do you know of any environmental cleanups that have taken place at the property? (6.)The degree of obviousness of the presence or likely presence of contamination at the property,and the ability to detect the contamination by appropriate investigation. Based on your knowledge and experience related to the property are there any obvious indicators that point to the presence or likely presence of releases at the property? SIGNATURE:DATE: NAME (PRINT):TITLE: REPRESENTING: The information contained above will be used exclusively for site information necessary for a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment of the subject property.The form and its attachments,if any,will appear in the report as on-site or interview documentation.American Compliance Technologies, Inc.will not further release the information contained on this form unless disclosure is authorized by the owner or owner’s agent or disclosure is required by law. 2 PROPERTY OWNER ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE AND DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Respond to:A•C•T Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc. 1875 West Main Street•Bartow, Florida 33830 Please return completed document to:mmadonna@a-c-t.com Purchaser:Stock Development Seller/Property Owner: Subject Property:Livingston Assemblage Thirteen (13) Vacant-Wooded Parcels of Real Estate Type of Property (please circle):Commercial Industrial Office Agricultural Residential Other For the following questions answer as completely as possible. If there is not enough space to completely answer a “yes” question you may attach any additional information you have readily available. If the information is not readily available to you list a source for the additional information in the space provided or attach additional sheets. If you have questions about any item call or fax your question to the numbers listed above or call toll free at 800/226-0911. Current and/or Previous Site Usage Date of original construction: Describe substantial renovations and additions (provide dates): Describe current use of property: Describe previous use of property: Names of previous owners: Have you investigated land title records for environmental liens, if yes, describe: Are you aware of any of the following hazardous or regulated materials or devices currently or historically stored, used or controlled on site (please circle)? Petroleum/chemical underground storage tanks Y N N/A Unknown Petroleum/chemical above ground storage tanks Y N N/A Unknown Petroleum/chemical storage precision or leak test Y N N/A Unknown Petroleum/chemical storage (drums or other containers)Y N N/A Unknown Pesticides or other agri-chemicals Y N N/A Unknown Hazardous waste/substance generated Y N N/A Unknown Hazardous waste/substance storage or disposal Y N N/A Unknown PCB transformers Y N N/A Unknown PCBs in other equipment Y N N/A Unknown Asbestos containing materials Y N N/A Unknown Assessment for asbestos containing materials Y N N/A Unknown For any “yes”answer, please describe and/or provide test, assessment or other documentation: Are you aware of any following air emissions sources or devices currently or historically associated with the site (please circle)? Stacks Y N N/A Unknown Vents Y N N/A Unknown Air pollution control equipment Y N N/A Unknown Emissions monitoring equipment Y N N/A Unknown For any “yes”answer, please describe and/or provide test, monitoring or other information: Are you aware of any of the following sources of water or wastewater discharges currently or historically associated with the site (please circle)? Discharges to land surface Y N N/A Unknown Discharges to surface water Y N N/A Unknown Discharges to septic tanks Y N N/A Unknown Discharges to ground water/injection wells Y N N/A Unknown Discharges to public sewers Y N N/A Unknown For any “yes”answer, please describe and/or provide permits, permit numbers, monitoring data, water quality data and ancillary information as necessary to completely describe: Are you aware of any of the following waste disposal sources currently or historically associated with the site (please circle)? Sources of liquid waste (other than domestic)Y N N/A Unknown Sources of solid waste (other than garbage)Y N N/A Unknown For any “yes”answer, please describe and/or provide information to evaluate waste disposal sources: Does the purchase price of the property represent the fair market value for the property?Please Check:Yes No If “no”answer, please explain. Have there been any previous assessments conducted on the property, including but not limited to Phase I, Phase II, and/or Site Assessments ?Please Check:Yes No If “yes”answer, please explain and provide copies of any reports. Please provide the name, address and telephone number of the key site manager, operator and/or alternate individual who have knowledge of the site operations and who is available to be interviewed: CERTIFICATION As a duly authorized representative of the owner of the subject property described above, I certify that; to the best of my knowledge, information and belief; the information disclosed above is true, correct and complete. SIGNATURE:DATE: MM/DD/YY NAME (PRINT):TITLE: REPRESENTING: The information contained above will be used exclusively for site information necessary for a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment of the subject property. The form and its attachments, if any, will appear in the report as on-site or interview documentation. American Compliance Technologies, Inc. will not further release the information contained on this form unless disclosure is authorized by the owner or owner’s agent or disclosure is required by law. APPENDIX F HISTORICAL AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS SANBORN FIRE INSURANCE MAPS SOIL SURVEY MAP The EDR Aerial Photo Decade Package Livingston Assemblage Livingston Road and Veterans Memorial Blvd. Naples, FL 34110 Inquiry Number: December 19, 2017 5140197.5 6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor Shelton, CT 06484 Toll Free: 800.352.0050 www.edrnet.com 2010 1"=500'Flight Year: 2010 USDA/NAIP 2007 1"=500'Flight Year: 2007 USDA/NAIP 2006 1"=500'Flight Year: 2006 USDA/NAIP 2005 1"=500'Flight Year: 2005 USDA/NAIP 1999 1"=500'Acquisition Date: January 06, 1999 USGS/DOQQ 1993 1"=500'Flight Date: November 02, 1993 FLDOT 1986 1"=500'Flight Date: February 26, 1986 FLDOT 1980 1"=500'Flight Date: December 13, 1980 U of FL 1975 1"=500'Flight Date: November 14, 1975 FLDOT 1968 1"=500'Flight Date: March 05, 1968 FLDOT 1962 1"=500'Flight Date: January 01, 1962 U of FL 1958 1"=500'Flight Date: January 11, 1958 U of FL 1952 1"=500'Flight Date: February 28, 1952 USGS 1944 1"=500'Flight Date: January 01, 1944 U of FL EDR Aerial Photo Decade Package 12/19/17 Livingston Assemblage Site Name:Client Name: American Compliance Tech., Inc Livingston Road and Veterans Memorial Blvd.1875 West Main Street Naples, FL 34110 Bartow, FL 33830 EDR Inquiry #5140197.5 Contact:Michael Madonna Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR) Aerial Photo Decade Package is a screening tool designed to assist environmental professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. EDR’s professional researchers provide digitally reproduced historical aerial photographs, and when available, provide one photo per decade. Search Results: Year Scale Details Source When delivered electronically by EDR, the aerial photo images included with this report are for ONE TIME USE ONLY. Further reproduction of these aerial photo images is prohibited without permission from EDR. For more information contact your EDR Account Executive. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2017 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. 5140197 5-page 2 5140197.5 2010 = 500' 5140197.5 2007 = 500' 5140197.5 2006 = 500' 5140197.5 2005 = 500' 5140197.5 1999 = 500' 5140197.5 1993 = 500' 5140197.5 1986 = 500' 5140197.5 1980 = 500' 5140197.5 1975 = 500' 5140197.5 1968 = 500' 5140197.5 1962 = 500' 5140197.5 1958 = 500' 5140197.5 1952 = 500' 5140197.5 1944 = 500' Certified Sanborn® Map Report Inquiry Number: 6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor Shelton, CT 06484 Toll Free: 800.352.0050 www.edrnet.com Livingston Assemblage Livingston Road and Veterans Memorial Blvd. Naples, FL 34110 December 18, 2017 5140197.3 Certified Sanborn® Map Report Certified Sanborn Results: Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. page- The Sanborn Library includes more than 1.2 million fire insurance maps from Sanborn, Bromley, Perris & Browne, Hopkins, Barlow and others which track historical property usage in approximately 12,000 American cities and towns. Collections searched: Library of Congress University Publications of America EDR Private Collection The Sanborn Library LLC Since 1866™ Limited Permission To Make Copies Sanborn® Library search results Contact:EDR Inquiry # Site Name: Client Name: Certification # PO # Project 12/18/17 Livingston Road and Veterans Memorial Blvd. Livingston Assemblage American Compliance Tech., Inc 1875 West Main Street Naples, FL 34110 5140197.3 Bartow, FL 33830 Michael Madonna The Sanborn Library has been searched by EDR and maps covering the target property location as provided by American Compliance Tech., Inc were identified for the years listed below. The Sanborn Library is the largest, most complete collection of fire insurance maps. The collection includes maps from Sanborn, Bromley, Perris & Browne, Hopkins, Barlow, and others. Only Environmental Data Resources Inc. (EDR) is authorized to grant rights for commercial reproduction of maps by the Sanborn Library LLC, the copyright holder for the collection. Results can be authenticated by visiting www.edrnet.com/sanborn. The Sanborn Library is continually enhanced with newly identified map archives. This report accesses all maps in the collection as of the day this report was generated. 0CA9-4E48-B591 3109 UNMAPPED PROPERTY 18972 This report certifies that the complete holdings of the Sanborn Library, LLC collection have been searched based on client supplied target property information, and fire insurance maps covering the target property were not found. Certification #: 0CA9-4E48-B591 American Compliance Tech., Inc (the client) is permitted to make up to FIVE photocopies of this Sanborn Map transmittal and each fire insurance map accompanying this report solely for the limited use of its customer. No one other than the client is authorized to make copies. Upon request made directly to an EDR Account Executive, the client may be permitted to make a limited number of additional photocopies. This permission is conditioned upon compliance by the client, its customer and their agents with EDR's copyright policy; a copy of which is available upon request. This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2017 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. 5140197 3 2 Soil Map—Collier County Area, Florida Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 12/18/2017 Page 1 of 3290872029088102908900290899029090802909170290926029093502909440290872029088102908900290899029090802909170290926029093502909440423890423980424070424160424250424340424430 423890 423980 424070 424160 424250 424340 424430 26° 18' 10'' N 81° 45' 45'' W26° 18' 10'' N81° 45' 24'' W26° 17' 46'' N 81° 45' 45'' W26° 17' 46'' N 81° 45' 24'' WN Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 17N WGS84 0 150 300 600 900 Feet 0 50 100 200 300 Meters Map Scale: 1:3,620 if printed on A portrait (8.5" x 11") sheet. Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION Area of Interest (AOI) Area of Interest (AOI) Soils Soil Map Unit Polygons Soil Map Unit Lines Soil Map Unit Points Special Point Features Blowout Borrow Pit Clay Spot Closed Depression Gravel Pit Gravelly Spot Landfill Lava Flow Marsh or swamp Mine or Quarry Miscellaneous Water Perennial Water Rock Outcrop Saline Spot Sandy Spot Severely Eroded Spot Sinkhole Slide or Slip Sodic Spot Spoil Area Stony Spot Very Stony Spot Wet Spot Other Special Line Features Water Features Streams and Canals Transportation Rails Interstate Highways US Routes Major Roads Local Roads Background Aerial Photography The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:24,000. Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale. Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map measurements. Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey URL: Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857) Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate calculations of distance or area are required. This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below. Soil Survey Area: Collier County Area, Florida Survey Area Data: Version 10, Oct 2, 2017 Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000 or larger. Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Mar 1, 2014—Apr 2, 2014 The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. Soil Map—Collier County Area, Florida Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 12/18/2017 Page 2 of 3 Map Unit Legend Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI 14 Pineda fine sand, limestone substratum, 0 to 2 percent slopes 19.9 48.4% 21 Boca fine sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes 4.4 10.6% 25 Boca, Riviera, limestone substratum, and Copeland fine sands, depressional 16.9 41.0% Totals for Area of Interest 41.1 100.0% Soil Map—Collier County Area, Florida Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 12/18/2017 Page 3 of 3 APPENDIX G PHOTOGRAPHIC DOCUMENTATION -1- View looking southwest at the northeast parcels of the Subject Property. Not the dense vegetation and downed trees. View looking southwest at the northeast parcels of the Subject Property. -2- View looking west at the eastern portion of the northeast parcels of the Subject Property. View looking west at the eastern portion of the northeast parcels of the Subject Property. -3- View looking southwest at the northeastern portion of the northeast parcels of the Subject Property. View looking south at northern parcels of the Subject Property. -4- View looking south at northern parcels of the Subject Property. View looking east along Veterans Memorial Boulevard and the northern Property boundary of the Subject Property. -5- View looking west at the eastern portion of the northeast parcels of the Subject Property. View looking northwest at the southeast portion of the northeast parcels of the Subject Property. -6- View looking west at the southeast boundary for the northeastern parcels of the Subject Property. View looking south along the eastern boundary for the east-central parcels of at the Subject Property. -7- View looking southwest at the southeast portion of the east-central parcels of the Subject Property. View looking east at the west-central parcels of the Subject Property. -8- View looking east at the survey stakes for the west-central parcels of the Subject Property. View looking southeast at the west-central parcels of the Subject Property. -9- View looking east at the residential subdivision under construction adjoining to the east of the northeast parcels of the Subject Property. View looking northeast from the northeast corner of the Subject Property along Veterans Memorial Boulevard. -10- View looking northwest from the northeast corner of the Subject Property along Veterans Memorial Boulevard. View looking north at the residential subdivision located adjoining to the north of the S ubject Property across Veterans Memorial Boulevard. -11- View looking northwest at the residential subdivision located adjoining to the northwest of the Subject Property across Veterans Memorial Boulevard. View looking west at the vacant land located adjoining to the west of the northwest portion Subject Property across Livingston Road. -12- Signage for the residential subdivision located adjoining to the east, southeast and south of the Subject Property. View looking north at the residential subdivision located adjoining to the east, southeast and south of the Subject Property. -13- View of the Naples Fire Station #48 located adjoining to the west of the s outhwest portion of the parcels located on the Subject Property.