Loading...
CCPC Agenda 08/15/2019 Collier County Planning Commission Page 1 Printed 8/8/2019 COLLIER COUNTY Collier County Planning Commission AGENDA Board of County Commission Chambers Collier County Government Center 3299 Tamiami Trail East, 3rd Floor Naples, FL 34112 August 15, 2019 9: 00 AM Mark Strain - Chairman Karen Homiak - Vice-Chair Edwin Fryer - Secretary Patrick Dearborn Karl Fry Stan Chrzanowski, Environmental Joseph Schmitt, Environmental Thomas Eastman, Collier County School Board Note: Individual speakers will be limited to 5 minutes on any item. Individuals selecte d to speak on behalf of an organization or group are encouraged and may be allotted 10 minutes to speak on an item if so recognized by the chairman. Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the CCPC agenda packets must submit said material a minimum of 10 days prior to the respective public hearing. In any case, written materials intended to be considered by the CCPC shall be submitted to the appropriate county staff a minimum of seven days prior to the public hearing. All material used in presentations before the CCPC will become a permanent part of the record and will be available for presentation to the Board of County Commissioners if applicable. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the CCPC will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto, and therefore may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. August 2019 Collier County Planning Commission Page 2 Printed 8/8/2019 1. Pledge of Allegiance 2. Roll Call by Secretary 3. Addenda to the Agenda 4. Planning Commission Absences 5. Approval of Minutes A. July 18, 2019 CCPC minutes 6. BCC Report - Recaps 7. Chairman's Report 8. Consent Agenda A. PL20180000261/CPSP-18-2: 9 ordinance amendments of Ordinance 89-05, as amended, the Collier County Growth Management Plan of the unincorporated area of Collier County Florida, relating to the Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy. The following elements are changed or created with a separate ordinance for each: Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element and the Golden Gate Area Future Land Use Map and Map Series; Golden Gate City Sub-Element of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element; Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element; Rural Estates Sub- Element of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element; Conservation and Coastal Management Element; Future Land Use Element And Future Land Use Map And Map Series; the Stormwater Management Sub-Element of the Public Facilities Element; the Solid Waste Sub-Element of the Public Facilities Element; and the Transportation Element. [Coordinator: Kris VanLengen, AICP, Project Manager] 9. Public Hearings A. Advertised August 2019 Collier County Planning Commission Page 3 Printed 8/8/2019 1. ***This item has been continued from August 1, 2019 CCPC meeting*** PL20180003372/CPSS-2019-2: An Ordinance amending Ordinance No. 89-05, as amended, the Collier County Growth Management Plan for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida, specifically amending the Future Land Use Element to revise the Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict of the Urban Mixed Use District as to lots 5 and 6 of the Vanderbilt Commons Subdivision to remove the requirement to provide commercial uses on the first floor with residential units on the upper stories and allow buildings to be all residential uses on Lots 5 and 6; and directing transmittal of the adopted amendments to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity; providing for severability; providing for an effective date. Lots 5 and 6 comprise 10 acres within the 47.94± acre subdistrict located on the north side of Vanderbilt Beach Road and approximately ¼ mile west of Collier Boulevard in Section 34, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. (Companion to PL20180003366) [Coordinator: Corby Schmidt, AICP, Principal Planer] 2. ***This item has been continued from the August 1, 2019 CPCC meeting.*** PL20180003366: An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida amending Ordinance No. 2005-19, as amended, the Vanderbilt Commons Planned Unit Development; by removing the requirement that residential dwelling units be located in mixed-use buildings with commercial on the first floor and allowing stand-alone residential buildings; by restating a deviation to remove the wall requirement along Vanderbilt Beach Road and to add a deviation to reduce foundation plantings; by revising the master plan; and providing an effective date. The subject property, consisting of 14.49+/- acres, is located on the north side of Vanderbilt Beach Road and approximately 1/4 mile east of Collier Boulevard in Section 34, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. (Companion to PL20180003372/CPSS-2019-2) [Coordinator: Nancy Gundlach, AICP, Principal Planner] B. Noticed 10. New Business 11. Old Business 12. Public Comment 13. Adjourn 08/15/2019 COLLIER COUNTY Collier County Planning Commission Item Number: 5.A Item Summary: July 18, 2019 CCPC minutes Meeting Date: 08/15/2019 Prepared by: Title: Operations Analyst – Growth Management Operations & Regulatory Management Name: Judy Puig 08/07/2019 2:17 PM Submitted by: Title: Manager - Planning – Zoning Name: Ray Bellows 08/07/2019 2:17 PM Approved By: Review: Growth Management Operations & Regulatory Management Judy Puig Review item Completed 08/07/2019 2:18 PM Planning Commission Mark Strain Meeting Pending 08/15/2019 9:00 AM 5.A Packet Pg. 4 July 18, 2019 Page 1 of 55 TRANSCRIPT OF THE MEETING OF THE COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Naples, Florida, July 18, 2019 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Collier County Planning Commission, in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein, met on this date at 9:00 a.m., in REGULAR SESSION in Building "F" of the Government Complex, East Naples, Florida, with the following members present: CHAIRMAN: Mark Strain Stan Chrzanowski Karl Fry Edwin Fryer Karen Homiak ABSENT: Joe Schmitt Patrick Dearborn ALSO PRESENT: Raymond V. Bellows, Zoning Manager Nancy Gundlach, Principal Planner Anita Jenkins, Principal Planner Heidi Ashton-Cicko, Managing Assistant County Attorney Sally Ashkar, Assistant County Attorney Tom Eastman, School District Representative 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 5 Attachment: 7-18-2019 CCPC Minutes (9761 : July 18, 2019 CCPC minutes) July 18, 2019 Page 2 of 55 P R O C E E D I N G S CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Good morning, everyone. Welcome to the July 18th meeting of the Collier County Planning Commission. If everybody will please rise for Pledge of Allegiance. (The Pledge of Allegiance was recited in unison.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Will the secretary please do the roll call. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Mr. Eastman? MR. EASTMAN: Here. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Mr. Chrzanowski? COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Here. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Mr. Fry? COMMISSIONER FRY: Here. COMMISSIONER FRYER: I'm here. Chairman Strain? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Here. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Vice Chair Homiak? COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Here. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Mr. Schmitt? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: (No response.) COMMISSIONER FRYER: Mr. Dearborn? COMMISSIONER DEARBORN: (No response.) COMMISSIONER FRYER: Mr. Chairman, we have a quorum of five. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Dearborn and Mr. Schmitt notified me they wouldn't be able to be here today for conflicts, so they have excused absences. That takes us to the addenda to the agenda. And at this point in time, I was going to talk about a request for a continuance for the Allura project. And I know Mr. Pritt is here. I didn't see a lot of the public. We were going to entertain discussions from any members of the public who needed to speak today who could not be here for the continued date, which would be August 1st. So with that in mind, I think what we'll do is we'll have the continuance action after the Siena project. That way we can make sure everybody that shows up has an opportunity. Richard. MR. YOVANOVICH: Mr. Strain, I think the reason you don't see the crowd is I made sure that Mr. Pritt was copied on my request, and I believe he reached out to his people to tell them that we think we're going to get continued; don't waste your time coming -- so I -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, that's good. I'm glad -- MR. YOVANOVICH: I hope we can -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Pritt can just acknowledge that. That apparently may be the reason why most of the people aren't here? MR. PRITT: Robert Pritt, for the record. I represent Mediterra. I did receive the email from Mr. Yovanovich last evening, and I passed the word to the principals that I'm working with. And I know that one decided not to come. I don't see the other one. So I don't know how far out the word went within the community itself, but I did indicate to them that it was likely that it would be continued. We don't have a particular concern with that if you want to continue it till August 1st. I do have a -- I would have a request, and that will come up on August 1st. I'd like to be able to speak and get out of here by about 11 because I have to go over to the east coast for a special magistrate hearing. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. We're going to have to discuss that a little bit only because we have another action that was first on the agenda on August 1st, and it's going to be well populated. And they'd already requested the time frame, so that would put it past 11. 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 6 Attachment: 7-18-2019 CCPC Minutes (9761 : July 18, 2019 CCPC minutes) July 18, 2019 Page 3 of 55 Richard, what about moving your continuance to the second meeting in August? MR. YOVANOVICH: I talked to Bob. I don't think he can be here August 15th. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. MR. YOVANOVICH: So -- and, of course, I'll accommodate him going wherever in the order before 11. Even if I haven't spoken yet, I'd be happy to let him do that. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I don't mind working that into the time frame. I know the first one coming up is both a small-scale plan amendment and a PUD amendment. Both of them have got some heightened public concern with the surrounding neighborhood. I'm not sure how well attended it will be, but on the premise it will take -- MR. YOVANOVICH: Which item is it; do you know? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Pardon me? MR. YOVANOVICH: Vanderbilt Commons? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I'm not sure how involved it's going to get. I just couldn't guarantee we'll be done by 11. We'll figure out a way to accommodate your time frame, Mr. Pritt. You've got until 11. If we squeezed you in before the -- how much time will you need? MR. PRITT: Five, six minutes. I think your limit is seven for the -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I wouldn't -- you're representing a large group. You would be able to -- MR. PRITT: I'd try to make sure I keep within the seven-minute period. Probably five or six. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: We'll fit that in before 11 on the 1st. MR. PRITT: Thank you. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: With that, is there any public speakers for the Allura project besides Mr. Pritt? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. I guess we'll then -- instead of deferring the vote on the continuance, we'll do it now. And I did check, the next meeting is August 1st. And with the -- this item would normally be first up because it's continued, but we're going to have the other one up. Vanderbilt Commons is already scheduled, so we're going to leave them first. We'll interrupt that meeting to accommodate some time for Mr. Pritt, probably closer to the break if we haven't already started on Allura by then, and then we'll go into Allura after Vanderbilt Commons, and that will work for everybody, I think. So with that, is there a motion from the Planning Commission to continue the two Allura items? And I'll read them off. The first one is PL20170004419, which is the Livingston Road/Veterans Memorial Boulevard East residential subdistrict, and then the second one is the PL20170004385, and that's the Allura RPUD. All those -- the question: Is there a motion to continue those two items to the August 1st meeting? It will be the second meeting up. COMMISSIONER FRY: So moved. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Second. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Seconded. Mr. Karl Fry, not Fryer, and Karen seconded. All those in favor, signify by saying aye. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Aye. COMMISSIONER FRY: Aye. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Aye. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Aye. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Aye. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Anybody opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Motion carries -- five of us now -- 5-0. So those, Allura and the subsequent master plan amendment, will be continued to the August 1st 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 7 Attachment: 7-18-2019 CCPC Minutes (9761 : July 18, 2019 CCPC minutes) July 18, 2019 Page 4 of 55 meeting as noted. So with that, we'll move right into our next item on the agenda, which is Planning Commission absences. Does anybody know if they're not going to make it here on the 1st of August? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, we'll have a quorum. And I'll wait and see what Joe and Pat are going to do at that time. The approval of the minutes: We have two electronic versions were sent to us: One for the May 16th and one for June 16th. We'll take May 16th first. Any changes to the May 16th minutes? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Hearing none, is there a motion to approve? COMMISSIONER FRYER: Move approval. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: By Ned. Seconded by? COMMISSIONER FRY: Second. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Second. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Karl. Discussion? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: All in favor, signify by saying aye. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Aye. COMMISSIONER FRY: Aye. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Aye. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Aye. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Aye. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Anybody opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Motion carries 5-0. Same request for June 6th. Are there any changes to that needed? COMMISSIONER FRYER: Move approval. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Approval by Ned. Seconded by? COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Second. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Stan. Discussion? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: All in favor, signify by saying aye. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Aye. COMMISSIONER FRY: Aye. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Aye. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Aye. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Aye. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Anybody opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Motion carries 5-0 for that. Takes us to the BCC report and recaps. They had their last meeting, Ray. Anything happen? MR. BELLOWS: Yes. The conditional use for the concrete batch plant on the East Trail, that was Conditional Use No. PL20170002361, that was approved on the Board's summary agenda, so that would be subject to the Planning Commission recommendation. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: But it was staying on summary? MR. BELLOWS: Yes. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. So the -- okay, thank you. That's it. 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 8 Attachment: 7-18-2019 CCPC Minutes (9761 : July 18, 2019 CCPC minutes) July 18, 2019 Page 5 of 55 Okay. Chairman's report: Nothing new. We're just going to move through the summer and keep going, gentlemen and ladies. With that, there's nothing on the consent agenda. The next advertised public hearing -- and, by the way, we have two things left for today. The first one will be the Orange Blossom Gardens PUD called Siena Lakes, and the last one that will be discussed today is the Golden Gate Area Master Plan adoption hearing. So let's move in with the first one. It's PL20180001147 -- 1174, I'm sorry, Orange Blossom Gardens PUD to the -- change it to the Siena Lakes CCRC CPUD. All those wishing to testify on behalf of this item, please rise to be sworn in by the court reporter. (The speakers were duly sworn and indicated in the affirmative.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you. Thank you, sir. Disclosures: We'll start with Tom. MR. EASTMAN: No disclosures outside of those in the public record. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Stan. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: No. Not on this project, no. I talked to Mr. Yovanovich, but I -- the only thing -- well, yeah, I talked to Mr. Yovanovich briefly. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Karl. COMMISSIONER FRY: Staff and emails as distributed. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Ned. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Staff, emails, and Mr. Yovanovich. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: And I had a phone conversation with Mr. Yovanovich. I had set a meeting up with the group, but I didn't make -- I couldn't make it to the meeting because I had an illness that day, so I wasn't here. So other than that, I don't recall of any other discussions. Go ahead, Karen. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: I spoke to Mr. Yovanovich. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. With that, Bob, it's all yours. MR. MULHERE: Thank you. For the record, Bob Mulhere with Hole Montes here representing Erickson Living. The screen indicates that Brian Palmer from Erickson Living is here, but that's not actually the case. He had some other pending activities he had to tend to, and so we have Scott Genson (sic) here from Erickson Living. Rich Yovanovich is our land-use attorney. I have Paula McMichael with me here as well who has worked extensively on this project and may need to help me. Barry Jones had an emergency situation, but we've got the esteemed Terry Cole with us. Terry did all of the majority of stormwater engineering for all the properties abutting Orange Blossom between Airport and Livingston, so he will be a good resource on those issues; and Norm Trebilcock, who is our transportation engineer. This aerial -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Before I -- before we get into it too far, I see staff back there, but I don't see our transportation staff. Okay. As long as someone from transportation -- I just was told Trinity's in the hall. I just want to make sure someone from transportation is here. Thank you, Trinity. Appreciate it. Go ahead, Bob. MR. MULHERE: Okay. So this aerial depicts the subject site. The original PUD is outlined by the faded red line here, and this is the portion that we are adding to the site. It's 5.85 acres. This is St. Katherine's Greek Orthodox Church here. They also own this parcel right here. This is Lakeside of Naples, Bridgewater Bay, and Walden Oaks and, of course, Orange Blossom running through. And this is the zoning map. As I said, the Orange Blossom Gardens portion of -- the remaining portion of Orange Blossom Gardens PUD is 5.85 acres, and the existing approved Siena Lakes CCRC is 29.25 acres. 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 9 Attachment: 7-18-2019 CCPC Minutes (9761 : July 18, 2019 CCPC minutes) July 18, 2019 Page 6 of 55 A little bit of history: The Orange Blossom Gardens PUD was originally approved by Ordinance 85-5, and it allowed 84 dwelling units at the time. It was amended in '92, reducing the density down to 40 multifamily units; and again in '09, reducing the acreage down to the 5.85 and allowing for 20 multifamily. We amended that in 2018 to add the temporary principal use of off-site sales for the Siena Lakes CRCC CPUD and added uses accessory to St. Katherine's Greek Orthodox Church. They own the property. And the reason we added that was just in case this didn't go forward, they would have the ability, if we were going through the process, to continue to use that parcel for their own reasons. Actually, the off-site sales center was constructed and opened in early 2019, and maybe you've seen some of the advertising for the project on TV. I know I have. Siena Lakes was originally approved in 2009 by Ordinance 09-65. I believe Terry worked on the original project. It allowed 340 independent living units and assisted living units and 20 assisted living beds, 45 skilled nursing beds, and 15 memory care beds, and it allowed for a floor area ratio at that time of 0.6 at that time. PUDs came in and asked for a higher floor area ratio, and they were granted, but there wasn't a requirement then to ask for a deviation, so this PUD was approved for a floor area ratio of 0.6. A PDI was approved in 2018, which revised the ratio of permitted residential units without increasing the total number, and revised master plan details. At that time it allowed 355 independent living units, 35 ALUs, 30 skilled nursing and memory care beds. This particular request now is to add that 5.85 acres of Orange Blossom Gardens into Siena Lakes, assuming -- if this is approved, then Erickson will close o n the property and acquire it. It's also to increase the ILUs by 76 for a total of 431, increase the ALUs by 12 for a total of 47, increase the square footage from 764,478 to 878,889, and allow a combined floor area ratio of 0.58. That number is achieved by applying .45 to the new parcel, retaining the .6. That's what you get, 0.58. We are revising some development standards, revising and adding some deviations, and we'll go over those in just in minute, and also revising and adding developer commitments that now are standard -- the standard required but probably weren't at the time that this was originally approved. I have to say that this is if not the most, certainly one of the most detailed master plans I have ever seen in Collier County. It has a lot of detail, and I suppose that's a good thing, because there was a lot of discussion with the neighboring communities at the time that this was approved. And this is our proposed master plan which retains that detail, and this is, I guess, Sheet 1 of 6. I want to point out the sales facility right here, which is a one-story building, and you can see that this building here is three over parking. The property line -- well, actually, I have another exhibit that outlines it a little bit better, so I'll hold off on that until I get to that exhibit. This is the proposed master plan for the 5.85-acre Orange Blossom piece that we're adding to the Siena Lakes CCRC PUD (sic). This is Sheet 2, which shows the southern portion of the property -- excuse me -- the eastern portion of the property. As you can see, this is the land-use summary. I know there will be some questions. We do know that there is one error here that we need to correct. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Actually, there's two. There's three different numbers, so two of them have got to be corrected. MR. MULHERE: Yes. I thought I'd wait until you raised those issues. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: You can bring it up any time. MR. MULHERE: Well, I know for sure this says over here -- I'm trying to -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: It says 64 over there. MR. MULHERE: Exactly. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: And to the left it's 63.2, and to the top it's 62.5 or 4 or something like -- MR. MULHERE: 63 percent is the correct number, so... CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 10 Attachment: 7-18-2019 CCPC Minutes (9761 : July 18, 2019 CCPC minutes) July 18, 2019 Page 7 of 55 MR. MULHERE: This is a sight exhibit, sightline exhibit. And this is the typical cross-sections and setbacks and so on and so forth. This is a colorized exhibit with renderings of the structures and a key to locate those renderings. I don't know if you -- when I downloaded the staff report, the Accela package, it seemed that some of the documents were cut off or hard to -- you know, it may have just been an error -- operator error. Are you-all okay with what you have? You were able to look at it properly and -- yes? Okay. Because I brought a copy I can put on the -- COMMISSIONER FRYER: The only issue I would have taken is that the master plan was split in two sheets. MR. MULHERE: Too big. Too much detail. It's easier to follow it by splitting it in two sheets. I think once we added this piece, it was just so much information -- oh, you mean in the Accela exhibit? No, we put a match line on it, yeah. It's just hard to -- it's not uncommon with a big piece of property. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Okay. MR. MULHERE: So with respect to the development standards and the changes that we requested, we reduced the minimum floor area for the ALU from 600 to 450. The industry has recognized that because of the cost of these things, while residents may come in early on looking for a larger unit, typically pretty quickly they're looking for a smaller unit. And that was my experience with my own parents when they entered into an ALF. And, you know, they went in with a larger unit, and within six months they went to the smaller unit. The minimum setback to Orange Blossom Drive is measured from the edge of the right-of-way reservation rather than the current property line. Now, we still have the same setback from our property line. We are 100 feet from the property line, but we reduced it to 60 because the county is going to acquire 40 feet. And I have a slide that demonstrates that a little bit better. Amend the setback to the west to reflect the new property boundary adjacent to the church and the church-owned parcel, and I'll show you that in just a minute. We had a setback for the porte cocheres that are part of the project, and we've exempted open-water structures from setback requirements, a pier, those kind of things. This shows the property line. I'm trying to remember -- click again. I guess I wanted to show you -- this is the -- oh, thank you. Okay. So this is the current property line. You can see the current property line, and you can see the proposed property line or proposed master plan setback line. The county actually increased the amount of right-of-way that they requested from us. And we've agreed to provide that right-of-way, but we've revised the setback to reflect what will be the property line when the county acquires that right-of-way. So in this case you can see it's a one-story -- or, excuse me, you can't. This is a three-story over parking and also a three-story over parking here, but further to the north where the sales facility is, it's a one-story building. And this is the setback adjacent to -- this is the original west property line. I'm sorry. And this is the new west property line. You can see here -- I want to point out that there are some lakes here that straddle that property line we addressed in the previous PDI and amendment. The stormwater management for the system is in a couple of different basins. I don't claim to be an expert on that. Terry can speak to the issue. But we negotiated and worked with St. Katherine's and developed a plan that would address stormwater really for both -- for all -- for both property owners. We worked with the staff and the Water Management District to address the permitting issues related to that. So this really provides for the best stormwater management system, and it makes sense, and everybody agreed to that. Some of the deviations, 1 through 5, that were previously approved, there were minor changes to wording made necessary to reflect the new PUD boundary. Deviation 6 we were withdrawing. I understand there may be some other questions regarding deviations, which we'll get to, and Deviation 7 was added related to that new property line where we're not providing a landscape buffer where the 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 11 Attachment: 7-18-2019 CCPC Minutes (9761 : July 18, 2019 CCPC minutes) July 18, 2019 Page 8 of 55 shared stormwater lakes exist between adjacent properties. The property to the west will have a landscape buffer, but obviously we're not going to put one in the middle of the lake. And also there is a need to have a clear area right in here for fire protection. We've added, as I said, the standard general commitments. For example, a trip cap, those types of standard commitments. We've added the right-of-way dedication for Orange Blossom Gardens. References to landscape buffer deviation as it relates to what I just mentioned with respect to the stormwater lakes. And we've added an environmental commitment that was required at the time we amended the Orange Blossoms -- the 5.85-acre remaining piece of the Orange Blossom's PUD. I've been told in conversations with Nancy that that may not still be required, but it's in there right now. So we can have a discussion about that. And I see Craig is here, so he can weigh in if -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I think the discussion was if it's required, it has to be in the code. If it's not in the code, then why is it being added. That's going to be the point. MR. MULHERE: Okay. Got it. The project, as proposed, is not a significant or adverse traffic generator for the roadway network at this location. There is adequate and sufficient roadway capacity to accommodate the proposed development without adversely affecting adjacent roadway network level of service. Turn-lane improvements are warranted at the project accesses on Orange Blossom, as the project meets multi-lane criteria. This development will be limited, as they said, to a maximum 146 two-way unadjusted p.m. peak hour trips. That concludes my presentation. I do have, as you know, a number of experts here. There's probably going to be some questions that I can't answer, and we'll rely on the experts. Happy to answer any questions you have. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: We'll go to questions from the Planning Commission. Ned? COMMISSIONER FRYER: Mr. Mulhere, I see that on the south setback there's a request to reduce it from 100 to 60 feet, and as partially compensating for that I see that the buffer would be increased from 15 to 20 feet. It's not a one-for-one offset. Are you confident that the neighbors are not opposed to that? MR. MULHERE: We didn't have any opposition to that issue. There were questions -- I didn't mention -- thanks for reminding me -- that we did have -- over the last two years or so that we've been working on this and with all those amendments that we've made, we've had the neighbors in probably three or four meetings. There were always questions about how the connecting internal Siena Lakes Drive would function, and there were always questions about when the county was going to make improvements to Orange Blossom which, by the way, there is no -- and Trinity can speak to that issue. There is no time frame for that at this point in time. But, generally, the question centered on, as much as possible, remaining true to the conditions that were placed on the original master plan, which I believe we have done. COMMISSIONER FRYER: So there was no opposition to the -- MR. MULHERE: Not to my knowledge. COMMISSIONER FRYER: -- construction? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: On that same thought, that reservation is still owned by you all, right? MR. MULHERE: Correct. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. So, really, your setback is 100 feet still? MR. MULHERE: Correct; yes. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. So you're not changing your setback. The county's just taken 40 feet of it for a right-of-way if they -- it's reserved for that if they want it, but your setback's 100 feet. MR. MULHERE: It is. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: But it would be 60 feet from the future right-of-way reservation. MR. MULHERE: That's correct. 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 12 Attachment: 7-18-2019 CCPC Minutes (9761 : July 18, 2019 CCPC minutes) July 18, 2019 Page 9 of 55 CHAIRMAN STRAIN: If they take the right-of-way. COMMISSIONER FRYER: That clarifies it. Thank you. MR. MULHERE: Thank you. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Then my next question has to do with actual height of the three over-parking buildings at the ILAs. And I believe that's 60 feet actual height; is that correct? MR. MULHERE: I'm going to get to that. Sorry. I know it's in here. COMMISSIONER FRYER: ILUs. MR. MULHERE: Let me just look here. I'll tell you; 60 feet. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Okay. Is that going to be in the PUD? MR. MULHERE: Yes. COMMISSIONER FRYER: It will? MR. MULHERE: It is. It is in the PUD. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Okay. Good. MR. MULHERE: It's on Page 4, which is the development standards of the PUD. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Okay. That's good. Then with respect to the NIM, throughout the NIM there was a failure -- repeated failure -- repeating failure for people to identify themselves except, oddly enough, the residents. They were pretty religious about doing so. Now, Bob, I know your voice but, still, some people don't. And there was a gentleman by the name of Barry who did not introduce himself or mention his name before speaking. MR. MULHERE: Thank you. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Going forward, if you would try to adhere to that, it's just helpful. MR. MULHERE: Yeah, I appreciate that. And I strive to remind people to do that. We've got a little bit better system in place, at least at Hole Montes now, so hopefully you'll see an improvement moving forward. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Actually, that duty ought to fall on our staff to make sure the NIM is properly maintained. That's why they're there. So maybe if the staff folks could sure -- make sure to remind people of that if they're not doing it. MR. MULHERE: I'm the most guilty, though, I have to admit. In the heat of the moment in the meeting I forget to say -- you know, I do tell them at the beginning, please introduce yourself, where you live, where you're from, who you're representing, but people forget. And I'll try to do a better job. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Thank you. There was a lady at the NIM who raised a concern about the flooding on Orange Blossom Drive. MR. MULHERE: Yes. COMMISSIONER FRYER: And I wanted to hear a little more from you about the extent, if any, to which this project will make that situation worse. MR. MULHERE: So I really appreciate that question. I'm going to let Terry -- because he's got so much experience in this area, and he would be the better expert to explain. MR. COLE: Good morning. Terry Cole, for the record. I actually designed Orange Blossom Drive from Airport to First Baptist Church Naples probably about 20 years ago. And I'm a member of the church, a very active member, and I've been traveling that road probably a few times a week for 17 years. My wife also works there every day. I'm not personally aware of any flooding problems along that section between Airport going east to Livingston with the exception there probably could have been an isolated incidence of a clogged catch basin, which I'm not aware of. I am aware that there have been flooding problems to the west of Airport along Orange Blossom going over toward Goodlette. And, in fact, I know they've done recent repaving. I've not familiar with any stormwater improvements they may have done. I will mention also that when we designed -- can we go to the overall -- 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 13 Attachment: 7-18-2019 CCPC Minutes (9761 : July 18, 2019 CCPC minutes) July 18, 2019 Page 10 of 55 MR. MULHERE: What do you want? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: You'll have to bring that handheld mic closer to you when you talk, too, Terry. MR. COLE: Okay. Thank you. MR. MULHERE: They're not going to see you point to the TV. MR. COLE: When I designed Orange Blossom Drive, somewhere about right in here there's a driveway with the landscaping company on the south side approximately in this location. Everything to the east of that point drains into the First Baptist Church water management system and -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: You mean St. Katherine's or First Baptist? MR. COLE: No. First Baptist Church. Everything along Orange Blossom Drive right-of-way -- everything from about this point in the Orange Blossom Drive right-of-way drains east into this lake here as part of the First Baptist Church water management system. Historically, the Stoneburners -- Stoney's Citrus Groves was in this area here, and they had the only barn here where they had their citrus sales, and they had the you pick -- you could drive through their groves. All of that drained to the east into the I-75 canal drainage system, ultimately. And so when we designed and permitted this 20 years ago, we made provisions to drain all of the Orange Blossom Drive right-of-way, including future four-laning, into the First Baptist Church system. And then from about this point here to the west, it had water-quality treatment before it drained into the Airport Road drainage system. So I just wanted to point out that there are provisions for four-laning Orange Blossom Drive in the future. This intersection and those improvements will have to be further addressed, but I just wanted to give you that as a little bit of background. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Thank you for that history. The lady and then two other spokespeople at the NIM, they were talking specifically about Orange Blossom Drive east of Airport, and they said something to the effect that it doesn't take much of a rain to cause flooding right there. So whatever system you put in, I'm sure it was a good one, but it perhaps is not functioning as well as one might have hoped or maybe it's clogged. My real question, though, goes to what the Siena developers are going to do to assure that they don't make the situation worse. MR. COLE: And we will ask the contractor to check those drainage basins. There has been construction work, of course, going on at the site, and we'll check the storm -- best management practice procedures and elements that are in place and have them check and make sure there's no clogging along Orange Blossom. Living -- excuse me -- Siena Lakes -- I want to go back to the other site plan, Bob. That's fine. The additional approximately six acres, these two lakes are going to be part of the water management system with the Greek Orthodox church to the west, and there will be a Water Management District permit modification to incorporate these into their system and, basically, this area along here, the buildings -- anything from the buildings is going to be draining to the east, including this lake will be draining to the east into the Siena Lakes stormwater management system. Bob, can I go to that other slide. Okay. Thank you. So the Siena Lakes water management system drains into the church through this drainage outfall pipe, and none of Orange Blossom Drive drains through Siena Lakes, and Siena Lakes is not going to impact Orange Blossom Drive's water management as well. COMMISSIONER FRYER: That's what I wanted to hear you say. Okay. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Could I just make a quick observation? COMMISSIONER FRYER: Of course. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: I live in Lakeside, for maybe 15 years now, and my 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 14 Attachment: 7-18-2019 CCPC Minutes (9761 : July 18, 2019 CCPC minutes) July 18, 2019 Page 11 of 55 parents lived there before that, and I've been going in and out of there since the place was built. I have never seen Orange Blossom east of Airport flood ever, and I travel that road all the time. I bicycle that road all the time. Correct me, that road slopes -- two lanes slope in one direction, right? MR. COLE: That's correct. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: The catch basin's only on one side. It's not crowned in the middle. Because when you do the other two lanes, you were going to put the other two lanes in the other direction. MR. COLE: Correct. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Transportation, tell me, are they ever going to build those other two lanes? Is there any plan to do that? I thought I saw her here, but I guess not. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Transportation likes to hide out in the hall until they're needed. MS. SCOTT: Good morning. For the record, Trinity Scott, Transportation planning manager for Collier County. I'm hiding in the hall because I can spread out. I've got files everywhere. In our current Capital Improvement Program, we do actually have the widening programmed; however, in the upcoming budget cycle we have actually recommended to the Board that they pull the four-laning of the roadway out. So what's adopted today does show it, but what we're recommending to the Board is not to four-lane at this time. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: At this time? MS. SCOTT: At this time. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Or ever? MS. SCOTT: At this time. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Okay. MS. SCOTT: I mean, we're still working with the developer to reserve the right-of-way for future -- COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Has anybody ever told you about flooding in that section? MS. SCOTT: No. And, actually, I was listening and instant messaging our stormwater staff. They have no knowledge either, as well as our road maintenance staff, but I have asked them to go out and see if they can look at the catch basins and see if anything's clogged. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: We used to prepare flooding maps for FEMA, and none of those maps showed any flooding in there. So whoever -- maybe they confused east to west, I don't know. But you're right, west of Airport, Orange Blossom floods all the time horribly, and I don't know if that's been cleared up or not. MS. SCOTT: I'll double-check. I specifically asked about that. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Well, good luck. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: The thing I'd like to comment, we have a lot of times comments from the public about flooding. It's a natural reaction to a lot of water in Florida. And if you haven't been here for a long period of time, you might not recognize that. Inches and inches of water can come down quickly. The road system's built to take that water away. It just doesn't happen instantly. So periodically you'll be driving through bigger puddles of water, especially during a downpour, than you will if you've just given a little bit of time to percolate. And I don't know how fast the runoff -- I know that, Terry, when you designed roads for me, they were -- we had four -- two lanes like this on each side. One lane even during higher rain event would be semi under ponding water while it drained off, and I imagine the same situation occurs here. Is that the case? I mean, how long do you expect the water to remain during a fairly substantial downfall? MR. COLE: I would say not more than half an hour. Typically we design roads for a 10-year 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 15 Attachment: 7-18-2019 CCPC Minutes (9761 : July 18, 2019 CCPC minutes) July 18, 2019 Page 12 of 55 one-hour storm, which is 3.3 inches per hour. Now, of course, we've had some intensities greater than that. It's very uncommon, but there have been times it's done that. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: The RCP, you put in for this when they built it, since they anticipated the four lanes, and you've got two lanes flowing one way. That was -- all that's capacity that's needed for now and for the future. So it's actually taking all that will be needed for that road s ystem to the effect that we've got today as far as the two lanes go. MR. COLE: Correct. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: So you'll put another RCP in in the future, or are you going to just connect to the one you've got and it's oversized for -- MR. COLE: We would connect to the one we have. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: So the one you've got's oversized? (Simultaneous crosstalk.) MR. COLE: It was oversized for the future but -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: So instead of two lanes, it's going to -- that RCP there today is set up for four lanes. So its dispersion rate's even faster than it will be under a four-lane condition. MR. COLE: Yes. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Yeah, but there is one -- there's a -- besides the intensity -- and you talked 3.3 inches an hour, which is like, what, nine-tenths in a 15-minute span. They have something called time of concentration. People's eyes start to glaze over when you start talking water management. But that's the time it takes for the peak of the storm to hit the catch basin. And, you know, it takes a while for that large amount. And if the storm lasts -- if it's like a 15-minute, which is fairly long. If the storm lasts 15 minutes and it drops an inch of rain, that's a rate of four inches an hour. And that gutter is sloped at a certain grade not meant to take that amount of water that fast. So if you get a real downpour real quick, it can overcome everything, and you get temporary flooding. And, you know, these people -- you've got to go there right when the window hits, and then you file a complaint the road flooded, but it really didn't. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: That's what I was getting at. So thank you. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Thank you for that discussion. It was helpful for me. MS. SCOTT: In an abundance of caution, we will go out and just make sure that we don't have anything that's clogged. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Do you video those pipes periodically to see if they've got sediment collecting in them? MS. SCOTT: Yes, but, as you know, stormwater is underfunded, so probably not as regularly as we'd like to. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Trinity, before you go back to your work area, in the NIM, the gentleman by the name of Barry indicated that Erickson is trying to accelerate the plan that I guess has now been tabled and also Erickson was bearing or willing to bear part of the cost of widening. So in spite of that, in spite of the willingness to share part of the cost, it's still being taken off the table? MS. SCOTT: Yes. As -- we do our Annual Update and Inventory Report on an annual basis and, really, the traffic just hasn't grown on that segment of roadway as we had anticipated. So we are still working with them to reserve the right-of-way so that in the future it could do so. They were willing to advance it more so to have the construction activity -- if we were going to be building to have that construction activity done before their opening. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Thank you. The next -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Back -- while you're here. MS. SCOTT: Uh-huh. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: You just hit on something that was going to be at least one of my 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 16 Attachment: 7-18-2019 CCPC Minutes (9761 : July 18, 2019 CCPC minutes) July 18, 2019 Page 13 of 55 transportation questions, so we'll catch you while you're here. In the transportation table that was in the staff report, Orange Blossom Drive, the road link between west of Airport -- west of Airport-Pulling Road, the 2017 AUIR remaining capacity was 641, Level of Service B. The 2018 AUIR remaining capacity is 781. Why -- I mean, it's rare for a road system to get better in Collier County, so could you explain to me why this one's better and why don't we do that to all the others? MS. SCOTT: People's travel -- we look at the AUIR on an annual basis, and people change their travel patterns. And so the background traffic, which is kind of the basis -- and then we add the trip bank onto that. The background traffic actually went down on that specific segment. That's why you see a reduction, because the capacity stays the same, but the actual background traffic, they divert it to another segment. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, that's a decent amount of additional capacity. It's like 20 or 25 percent. So I just thought that was an anomaly for Collier County to have a road improve when -- with more intensity we've had across this county, I thought everything would be worse. MS. SCOTT: The other thing to look at is the 20 or 25 percent when you're looking at -- I believe that roadway segment had about a 20 percent decrease. When you're looking at -- it carries, I think, about a thousand vehicles. Twenty or 30 vehicles is a larger percentage for that particular roadway segment, which the layperson wouldn't notice. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Is this part of the TCMA; do you know? MS. SCOTT: I believe it is. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: So the benefit of this road's better performance is going to offset the negative concerns we have on other roads like Immokalee and places like that, because they're all kind of -- MS. SCOTT: Yes, we look at the -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: -- amalgamated together. MS. SCOTT: We look at the areawide overall performance of the segments. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Unbelievable. Okay. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Well, I had noticed that, too, and that's why I didn't have a problem or question about traffic, so that is the -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: That actually created a problem for me. And, Karl, have you got a followup? COMMISSIONER FRY: I could lend potential anecdotal insight into how the traffic on that segment might have reduced in one way. It's useful as a cut-through if you're coming Airport north and you want to go over to Livingston and get on Vanderbilt heading east. And -- but because traffic backs up so badly on Livingston to turn right onto Vanderbilt Beach heading north, it's no longer -- like, I used to do that, and I would cut over Orange Blossom, and I've stopped doing that, because you wait too long in line on Livingston onto get Vanderbilt Beach. So now I go up to Vanderbilt Beach and straight through the light, which is quicker. So it supports what you're saying -- MS. SCOTT: Right. COMMISSIONER FRY: -- that there are -- I think it's all interconnected. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay, thank you. Go ahead, Ned. COMMISSIONER FRYER: The same -- the same speaker who mentioned the flooding, which I think we've disposed of -- I'm certainly satisfied with the answers and discussion we've had about flooding, but she also talked about the 6-foot wall, and she asked for consideration of an 8-foot wall on the south side. I'd like to know a little bit about your plans. Because, Bob, you said we'll take that into consideration. MR. MULHERE: And we did -- but I'm a little confused, because I thought -- I'm sorry. I thought the comment that the woman made at the neighborhood information meeting related to the wall 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 17 Attachment: 7-18-2019 CCPC Minutes (9761 : July 18, 2019 CCPC minutes) July 18, 2019 Page 14 of 55 on the north side. There is an existing wall there. The wall on the south side isn't even on our property. It's across Orange Blossom Drive. It's within the development here on the edge of the right-of-way about two feet off the sidewalk. When that was built, the developer built the buildings very close to the edge of the right-of-way and put in a 6-foot wall. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Okay. So there is a 6-foot wall there? MR. MULHERE: Yes. COMMISSIONER FRYER: And it's not yours? MR. MULHERE: It's not ours. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Okay. That answers it. I just assumed that she was on the south side because she had also -- she had made the same comments about Orange Blossom road. MR. MULHERE: My recollection was she was talking about a wall along the north, which we have a -- I'm not sure the height. I think it's a 6-foot -- a 6-foot wall. COMMISSIONER FRY: Okay. Bob, there were actually two discussions that -- I'm looking at the NIM, the meeting notes. There was one about the wall at Walden Oaks, which was a future requirement, but a lady did ask about a wall on the -- in proximity to the neighboring communities. And you did say we would take it under advisement. MR. MULHERE: We did. But we've enhanced landscaping. We don't see the need to -- you know, there's an existing wall there. We don't see the need to increase that to eight feet. COMMISSIONER FRYER: I think -- I take your answer. I accept that, yeah. Where do I go here? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: While he's looking that up, do you guys know how wide Orange Blossom Drive is currently? MR. MULHERE: I'm sure we do. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I don't mean the asphalt. I mean the right-of-way. The current existing right-of-way without the reservation. MR. MULHERE: Sixty, I believe. Trinity would know, but she figures we won't call on her if she's not in the room. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: No, I think she went out to get the number. Okay. Well, she'll come back with it. We'll see where it is. MR. MULHERE: I believe it's 60. MR. COLE: It's 60. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. So if you've got 60 feet -- see, I knew she was -- she wouldn't abandon us. She's back. Sixty plus the 40 would be 100, plus another 60 before your building. So you're 160 feet from the -- MR. MULHERE: Correct. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: -- edge of right-of-way on the south side of Orange Blossom Drive already. MR. MULHERE: Yeah. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: So I'm not -- that's why I was surprised when the question was raised, because I don't know what it would help to have a wall on the south side of your project, but I understand probably on the north side where there -- but there's also a road on the north side for a good part of it. MR. MULHERE: People always ask and, you know, I understand that. And, you know, I guess I'd be planting some hedges in my backyard. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Any other questions from the Planning Commission? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Why don't we go to the Deviation No. 4. I have a question there. In that deviation on the second line, you added a couple words, but you crossed out three words that I need to stay in, and it says, to allow a private roadway with a width of 30 feet within, and then you crossed out 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 18 Attachment: 7-18-2019 CCPC Minutes (9761 : July 18, 2019 CCPC minutes) July 18, 2019 Page 15 of 55 "and access easement along" and then left the words "the western" and then changed the word "portion" of the property. The last sentence says, "This easement will provide two lanes for access to the lake side of Naples at Citrus Gardens PUD." Well, because that last sentence refers to an easement, and you've crossed out the language referencing it as an access easement, I think it should stay in. It doesn't hurt anything. MR. MULHERE: I have no problem with that. That makes sense. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. On Deviation No. 5, on the last part of it you've crossed out the -- talking about the east side of the access road in the last line and substituted the words "Siena Lakes Drive." Could you just make a note "as noted on the master plan"? MR. MULHERE: Sure. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Because I don't -- I want to make sure everybody recognizes it for that north/south link. MR. MULHERE: Yep. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: And I have a few more. Let me move into them. On the -- under your permitted use, under Exhibit A, the second paragraph talks about the mix of types of senior living facilities; 431 independent, 47 ALF, and 30 skilled nursing? That comes, I believe, to a total of 508. Could you weave the total in that paragraph somewhere appropriately so that we know, looking at it quickly, you've got 508 units there of some type. MR. MULHERE: Sure. So I think we just -- under principal uses, we add a sentence that says, the PUD allows up to 508 units, comma, as follows, colon. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: That's fine. That will work. I just want to make sure -- it's easier than having to total them up each time. I also talked to Mr. Yovanovich about the second page in your -- this one was some old language, but it needed -- while we're correcting things, let's clarify it. B says indoor accessory uses, comma, structures and amenities. And that same beginning occurs on C and D. It keeps saying outdoor accessory uses, miscellaneous accessory uses, and then, of course, the indoor one, and then the comma, and each one of them says structures and amenities. I don't think we need the word "structures and amenities." MR. MULHERE: I agree. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: And under the first one, B1, the following uses shall comprise a minimum of 72,000 square feet. Now, this is interior accessory uses. Your maintenance building, I don't think you're going to build that interior to one of your other buildings. I think it's going to be its own stand-alone. So that should probably move down to C, which is an outdoor accessory use. MR. MULHERE: Yeah, we'll do that. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: And then when we get to the Development Standards Table, a clarification. I understand now your setbacks. The internal drive setback number you have in the middle of that table, is that -- what's an internal drive on this project? Is Siena Lakes Drive considered an internal drive? MR. MULHERE: Yes. We could parenthetically add that. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I just think you might want to be clear, because if it goes through an SDP process and it comes up at that point, it might be harder to understand and -- MR. MULHERE: Yep. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: -- clarify. The -- and this is probably -- I think you've already answered this, and Terry may have. Your footnotes, you've got two of them, 1 and 4, that refer to the right-of-way reservation. The ultimate number of lanes on Orange Blossom is four. Is that what I heard? MR. MULHERE: Yes. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: So the width is going to limit it to that. MR. MULHERE: Yes. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Let's move to that Exhibit C2 of your master plan, and that's the one, 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 19 Attachment: 7-18-2019 CCPC Minutes (9761 : July 18, 2019 CCPC minutes) July 18, 2019 Page 16 of 55 Bob, where we talk about the percentage of open space that seems to be -- MR. MULHERE: Yes. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: -- all over the board. You've got actually three different numbers. MR. MULHERE: Yes. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I don't care how you do it, just pick a number and make it one so when it goes through for review you don't have to worry about it at that point, because now you're going to be cleaning up a table in a PUD, and I don't think you need to do that. MR. MULHERE: Paul and I talked about it. We believe it's 63. We'll verify that, and we'll make sure that it's the same in all three locations -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. MR. MULHERE: -- or two of the three, whatever -- because the land-use summary paragraph at the top, that number is different because we excluded Siena Lakes Drive from the open-space calculation, but I'll make sure that it matches. Thank you. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. If we go to Page 18 of the PUD -- MR. MULHERE: Okay. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: -- payment of road impact fees. Are they -- is there some reason you're not paying road impact fees like ordinary folks? Are you just -- I know it's old language, but we have an opportunity to clean it up, and I just want to make sure we catch everything that we need to. MR. YOVANOVICH: We had agreed to pipeline payments of road impact fees, and that's why this paragraph was originally in there. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: So the pipeline's still in effect after -- even though it's a decade old. Okay. That's really pipelining it. MR. YOVANOVICH: Well, it was tied to an agreement that was reached with the county. Not only us. There were several property owners on that intersection. Am I remembering it correctly, Trinity? So we had committed to that. I'm happy to go back to not having to front-load those, but we're already -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: But I'm wondering, if we're not going to build the four-laning, why are we worried about it? I'm not trying to give anything away. I'm just trying to understand the practicality of it. And you weren't there yesterday, so I couldn't give you a heads-up as to what I was going to ask. MS. SCOTT: That's okay. Once again, Trinity Scott, Transportation Planning. Yes, I was in Missouri yesterday. Road impact fees could still be utilized for the capacity adding for the intersection improvement. There is a need to do some intersection improvements at Orange Blossom and Airport, just not the widening. So any capacity adding those impact fees could be placed towards that. And then also, to answer your last question, I have to thank Mike Bosi, because my computer decided to reboot. Sixty feet is the right-of-way of Orange Blossom Drive. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you. And don't go away. Next question, same section of that PUD. The title of Item 6 says, "Payment of road impact fees." A and B makes sense then. C, tell me how that fits. That's not an impact fee. MS. SCOTT: It is not. So when we do an intersection improvement, some of those are just operational improvements that are not necessarily capacity adding. Capacity adding is when you increase the capacity of the intersection and, ultimately, the link. So they will pay their fair share of those that would not be impact-fee eligible. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I understand, but it's not an impact fee. It's under a paragraph that's titled "payment for road impact fees." MS. SCOTT: Oh, yes. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: So why don't we just move it to its own stand-alone paragraph as a developer commitment. 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 20 Attachment: 7-18-2019 CCPC Minutes (9761 : July 18, 2019 CCPC minutes) July 18, 2019 Page 17 of 55 MS. SCOTT: I have no objection to that. MR. YOVANOVICH: How about we just say road-related fees. Strike the word "impact." CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Payment of road-related impacts. I don't care. Whatever you want. I just -- it doesn't fit is all I'm -- MR. YOVANOVICH: I understand, Mr. Strain. MS. SCOTT: Yep. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: And I think, Trinity, I don't have to bother you again for a few moments at least. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Could I just -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Go ahead. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: If you look at the map that's on there, the bottom right-hand corner, you see where the road goes from 100-foot right-of-way to at Walden Oaks it goes to a narrower right-of-way. MS. SCOTT: Yes. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Okay. For some reason the south property line there seems to jog five feet in toward the road where it goes past Walden Oaks, and the Property Appraiser says that that right-of-way is only 55 foot. You may want to check that out. It's normally 60 foot. MS. SCOTT: Yes. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: But it definitely shows a jog there, so you may want to check that. MS. SCOTT: We'll go back and check. A few years back the Property Appraiser updated things. And if it's an easement, sometimes it doesn't show up. But I will have our right-of-way folks check it. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Yeah, because that wall fits right on the right-of-way; otherwise, that wall is in your right-of-way so -- MS. SCOTT: Yes. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Yeah, thanks. MS. SCOTT: We will double-check that. Thank you. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Bob, on page -- the next page, No. 10, it says, the CCRC shall be required to provide pedestrian and vehicle connections. It really should say developer or whatever name we've given it -- yeah, owner/developer; however that should be connotated, it's -- I don't know who the CCRC really is. MR. MULHERE: Good point. I think, Heidi, owner? I think so. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. On the next page, which is Page 20, Items 7 and 8, No. 7 says, "each unit shall be equipped with pull cords designed to notify emergency service providers." Pull cords probably went out with regular light bulbs years ago. I don't mind you leaving that in, but I'd like to say "or equivalent" to give you the benefit of being modernized. MR. MULHERE: Yeah. It's probably a button. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Whatever they have. MR. MULHERE: Okay. I've got it. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Maybe it's Alexa. MR. MULHERE: Okay. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: By the way, do you know you can whisper to Alexa now? This is really a trip. If you don't want to wake somebody up and tell her to do something in the room, you can whisper to her, and she'll whisper back. It's just amazing the things they can do. So who knows, you might have a device near you can whisper to. MR. MULHERE: Does she cook? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Not yet. Boy, would that take a different approach to things. Number 8, Bob, is there something special about this kind of a project that goes beyond federal and state laws? Because this one says you have to design to accommodate residents with physical 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 21 Attachment: 7-18-2019 CCPC Minutes (9761 : July 18, 2019 CCPC minutes) July 18, 2019 Page 18 of 55 impairments as required by building codes in federal law and regulation, but you have to do that anyway, right? MR. MULHERE: You have to do that anyway. I think that's a bit redundant. I don't know why -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: If you don't mind taking that out, I don't see the necessity to it unless some else does. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Covenant to comply with the law. MR. YOVANOVICH: Mr. Strain, I'm not sure that if you build an independent living unit under the law you're required to have it -- the intention of this provision was if moved into an independent living unit, you wouldn't be required to move out of that unit because it wasn't able to be retrofitted because your circumstances changed, like lowering of countertops or whatever you would have to do under the handicapped code. So this provision was inserted -- and I know I'm speaking against our interest, but this was inserted so people would be able to age in place without having to be relocated, because I don't think there was a legal requirement that units be built that way. So that's why that provision was in there. And I think Scott's confirmed that there's nothing in the law that would require an independent living unit to accommodate changes in the future for independent individual residents. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: So what you're saying is, by this paragraph, your applicant, your client, if someone is aging in an independent living unit and they need wheelchair access throughout the unit and it's not currently to those standards, they will go in and change -- revamp that entire unit even though that unit -- if I'm not mistaken, with their facility, the buy-in buys the person the privilege to stay there, basically, for the remainder of their life, but it doesn't go to the person's estate. So then they re-inherit the unit with all these changes that they've now got to bring be somebody else into. Is that how it works? MR. YOVANOVICH: It says it has to be designed to accommodate the ability to do that. And that's what it -- and that -- and I remember negotiating this many, many years ago when Commissioner Coyle was on the Commission, because there was a desire to -- if someone wanted to stay in their unit, it needed to be designed for the ability to make changes to that unit. It doesn't discuss who's got to pay for those changes. It does discuss that it needs to be designed in a way for that to happen, because you didn't want to force a resident to move because it wasn't properly designed to let -- in case you go from not needing a wheelchair to needing a wheelchair. That's where that came from. I mean, we'll -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: No, no. Out of an abundance of caution, we'll leave it -- let's leave it. I just was trying to clean the document up since we opened it up. That's all. MR. YOVANOVICH: I mean -- yeah, we'll take it out, but I just wanted you to understand the -- you were assuming that it was already covered somewhere else. (Simultaneous crosstalk.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Right. That was the question. MR. YOVANOVICH: We talked about this yesterday. I don't want that -- I don't want you to have the wrong assumption when you're saying just delete that. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: All right. So we'll leave that one in, and you guys argued on behalf against yourself really well, Richard. Thank you. MR. YOVANOVICH: I wasn't arguing against myself. I was just providing truth in advertising. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Let's see you remember your position. Under the environmental section, environmental -- No. 2, someone's got to explain that to me, because there is -- I thought there was a listed species survey in this staff report. I'm not sure what the soil testing issue is. But if you're not required to do that now, then why are you being required do it and nobody else? And if you are required to do it and it's in the code, then why is it being added to the PUD? MR. MULHERE: Okay. So good question. We did do a listed species survey -- 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 22 Attachment: 7-18-2019 CCPC Minutes (9761 : July 18, 2019 CCPC minutes) July 18, 2019 Page 19 of 55 CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I saw it. I thought -- MR. MULHERE: -- about eight months ago. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. MR. MULHERE: But we haven't done soil testing that's required by the LDC to my knowledge, and so -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: But it's required by the LDC. MR. MULHERE: It is if you had previous history of agricultural operations. So, obviously, we'll have to do that. It's already required, so I don't know why -- if we haven't done it, it's required, so... CHAIRMAN STRAIN: That's what I'm saying. Why don't we -- unless staff has a reason this has got to stay there, it's already covered one way or the other, so let's strike it. Why keep putting stuff in PUDs we don't need? MR. MULHERE: I'm not sure -- it went in the first one, so we kept it in this one. But we've struck through it. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, it's new language. So under the architectural review, can't that be struck as well? Because -- MR. MULHERE: Yeah. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: -- that's covered in the LDC as well. MR. MULHERE: Yes. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Let me see. I see Norm sitting there. Boy, I hope I have something for Norm. And, honestly, I actually understood what he wrote this time. So I don't have -- you see he's so intense I can't figure out how we got to some of the places. But, Norm, I don't have any questions on your TIS this time. So -- and that's it, thank you, from me. Anybody else have anything? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: We'll go with the staff report, Nancy. MS. GUNDLACH: Good morning, Commissioners. For the record, I'm Nancy Gundlach, principal planner with the Zoning Division. And staff is recommending approval of this petition as it is consistent with the Growth Management Plan and the Land Development Code. If you have any questions, it would be our pleasure to answer them. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Nancy, did you hear any of the -- go -- discussions back and forth that would change your position? MS. GUNDLACH: No. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Any members of the Planning Commission have any questions of staff? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Thank you. With that, we'll hear any public speakers that want to talk. Anybody registered, Ray? MR. BELLOWS: No one has registered. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Anybody -- member of the public here who would like to speak on this item? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Hearing none, I don't think you guys need a rebuttal. And we'll move into discussion before a motion. That will close the public hearing, and I'll go to the Planning Commission. You guys have any questions, concerns? We heard the comments made. As far as -- I'll read anything -- I don't really have any -- everything we talked about is the kind of stuff we normally put -- we fix as we go along. So I don't see any specific stipulations needed. It's pretty straightforward. Anybody want to make a motion? 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 23 Attachment: 7-18-2019 CCPC Minutes (9761 : July 18, 2019 CCPC minutes) July 18, 2019 Page 20 of 55 COMMISSIONER FRYER: I'll make a motion to approve PUDA-PL20180001174. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Subject to the clarifications we just put on record? COMMISSIONER FRYER: Yes. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: I'll second. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Seconded by Stan. Discussion? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: All in favor, signify by saying aye. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Aye. COMMISSIONER FRY: Aye. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Aye. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Aye. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Aye. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Anybody opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Motion carries 5-0. Thank you all very much for attending. MR. MULHERE: Thank you. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Stan? COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Wasn't a member of the public sworn in? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Yeah, but they don't have to speak if they've got their questions resolved during the discussion. So I think that's what happened, Stan. That takes us -- we're going to -- the Allura project was continued. So we will move to the -- we'll start the next item and take a break at 10:30 for about 15 minutes and then continue after that. ***The next item up is PL20180000261/CPSP-2018-2. It's the Golden Gate Area Master Plan restudy. This previously had come to us on transmittal. Now it's here for adoption. And, Mike, I guess it looks like you're coming up to start it out? MR. BOSI: Mike Bosi, Planning and Zoning Director. And, actually, Anita's going to walk you through. What I'm going to do is bring up the agenda packet for the visualizer. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. And I -- I'd like to suggest that we would want to -- there's three sections of this now: The city, the urban, and the rural. I'd like to discuss them separately since we are -- you did a good job on providing the breakdowns and red -- yeah, redline and underline, so it makes it easier to understand the sections better. And if you don't mind -- and you can -- if you have some general comments, fine. If not and you want to focus on the city first, that would be probably a logical place to start. MS. JENKINS: Sure. There is one before that, the Golden Gate Area Master Plan element, and then the three sub-elements. So if you have -- the element really just includes the introduction and overview. So if you have any questions about that, we could look at that; otherwise, we can go right into the Golden Gate City sub-element. And, Commissioners, I would ask that, because we have different formats in our documents, that -- if you notice the footer at the bottom of these documents, which refers to double underline, double strikethrough, underline/strikethrough, there's a page number right above that footnote. And so when we talk about those, if you could -- when we're tracking along, just reference that page number so we're all on the -- I'm on the same page with you. It will be easier. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: In the general one, I do have -- first of all, I think we're going to have to take these in two different sections. The document you sent us most recently, which is the redline/strikethrough, I'd like to walk through that for all three or four sections. And then I believe there's nine separate ordinances that we're being asked to adopt. I'd like to then, prior to adopting those, discuss any comments on each one of those. Some may be slightly -- I tried to eliminate the duplications from mine to those, but -- so there might be some duplication, but at least we can walk through separately so 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 24 Attachment: 7-18-2019 CCPC Minutes (9761 : July 18, 2019 CCPC minutes) July 18, 2019 Page 21 of 55 we know what we're voting on on each one. And the first thing, I want to go back before we go into the city, is under the general. This exhibit, or these things that you gave us, this last packet, didn't include the maps that were attached. And the map that's under the master plan element, the first piece, says, "Original Golden Gate Area Master Plan study areas." That's No. -- Page No. 4. Now, I looked on the ordinance to find out what that map is, and it's not a map that's going to help anybody understand what this is about. And I'd like to see a map that -- first of all, the study areas include Study Area 5, which is -- was actually dispensed with back in 2001 when I was chairman of that restudy at that time. We -- it's no longing on the table. It's been taken over by the State for water purification purposes and whatever recharge. So rather than use a map that doesn't give us enough information as to what we're doing today, couldn't we take the map that provides information about the three areas -- the way they -- Golden Gate Estates is broken down as we're doing it today and make that an exhibit under III maps, triple 3 maps, for Page 4. MS. JENKINS: Sure. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: That way, if someone readily wants to find out where the rural estates starts and stops, they could can look at that map, and the same for the city and the same for the urban area. And then that gets us into the Golden Gate City sub-element. And so -- I'm not sure how many -- all of them are a couple dozen pages or so. Why don't we take them all at once. And, Ned, do you want to start in? COMMISSIONER FRYER: Sure. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: How did I know that? COMMISSIONER FRYER: I don't know. First of all, I want to thank staff for working with me on a one-on-one basis. It was very useful; possibly not as useful as one -- that others might have thought, because although lots of my questions were answered -- and that was very helpful -- most of which I had were comments. And, of course, as Heidi had pointed out, those comments had to be brought back, you know, for the entire Planning Commission. So -- but, nonetheless, it did reduce my number of comments by about half, so I appreciate that. Thank you. Let's see. Oh, the other thing that I want to say, just as a preface, for some reason when I download and it converts to PDF, it cuts off the page numbers. Now, I don't know if that's just me or if other people have that problem; the ones in the lower right. Now, I use PDF Expert, which renumbers it, and it tells me that there are 1,981 pages in the document, and it tells me what page I'm on. That may or may not coordinate with the page number that you or Chairman Strain have. So I'll try to refer to policy numbers and objectives and the like when I go through these. MS. JENKINS: And if you can see the little page number just above the footer, I think we could probably all see that page number as well as in each sub-element. COMMISSIONER FRYER: That's the one that disappears for me. MS. JENKINS: Oh, okay. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Yeah, for some reason. I'm not sure why. COMMISSIONER FRY: She's talking about this number. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Oh, okay. I have seven, in other words, on this -- okay. Fine. Let me start then. Policy 1.4.2 on Page 7, the strict enforcement. I understand this is almost always a good idea, but is that exactly where the BCC is on the subject of short-term rentals? I just -- I don't know. MS. JENKINS: So we did not make any changes to that policy. It was not something that came up through the public input. But I can tell you when we were doing the workshops, Code Enforcement 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 25 Attachment: 7-18-2019 CCPC Minutes (9761 : July 18, 2019 CCPC minutes) July 18, 2019 Page 22 of 55 was always something that was brought to our attention, and that is something that the civic association in Golden Gate Estates (sic) discusses at each meeting that they have monthly. So they're serious about code enforcement in that area, so we did not recommend any changes to that. It does talk about -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I think you said the Golden Gate Estates discusses every -- MS. JENKINS: Golden Gate City Civic Association. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: City, okay. MS. JENKINS: And the rural estates as well may discuss it. I'm not sure if they -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: But this is -- we're on the city piece, that's all. I was just trying to make sure. MS. JENKINS: Right. So the city civic association does have Code Enforcement at each meeting that they have, and they do discuss code enforcement. So I think it's somewhat qualified to the strict enforcement of the things that they find as code issues. But if that gives you pause, strict or not, you know, you can make that part of your motion. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Well, I don't feel that strongly about it. But it just seems to me that the County Commission's policy, perhaps, is evolving, and we don't want something on the books that conflicts with where it appears to be going at present. But I think I've said all I want to say about it, so that's fine. Then on Policy 2.1.5, this is a consistency issue. The word "established" is used when in other similar cases the word "initiated" is used. And I think it gives staff more flexibility, and it's less of a hammer on staff to at least have "initiated" something rather than have gotten it completed within the time frame. So I would recommend that you go with the word "initiated" rather than "established." Then I go to my Page 1,833. In Policy 2.3.2 -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: What page are you on, Ned? COMMISSIONER FRYER: Nine. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Page 9, okay. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Yeah. And that is Policy 2.3.2. I would like to add the word "safe" before the word "walkability" in the first sentence, because I just think it's important for us to show that we're thinking about that, and even more so when we come to bicycling, which I'll talk about when we come to that. But I think it's important to acknowledge that safety can be a real issue and should be a word that's expressed in here. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, just out of curiosity, what do you think is safe? I mean, they've got to protect them from the neighborhood or from the cars or from the -- COMMISSIONER FRYER: Yeah, mostly the cars. You know, it gets back to this concern I have, and I've expressed it a number of times about complete streets and getting everybody so close together that it poses a danger to pedestrians and bicyclists. And I just think that that needs to be part of the equation, part of the analysis or the calculation when walkability is addressed, that the planners or the people who are executing on this plan are cognizant in an express way of looking out for safety. It seems to me that that's kind of hard to argue against, but maybe I'm wrong. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I just wanted clarification. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Okay. So that's something that I will, I guess, ask for at the end, or should I -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, this is the end. I don't -- I mean, I'm assuming Anita's -- if I don't hear an objection from Anita, I'm assuming she's agreeing to make the change, and unless you hear objections from the rest of us, I might -- some of us might want clarification, like I just did. I wasn't sure what kind of safety you're thinking of, and I wanted to understand your mindset in that regard to the area. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: The reason the study was done for the city is for safety. There is a walkability study for Golden Gate City. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Yeah. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: That's the point. 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 26 Attachment: 7-18-2019 CCPC Minutes (9761 : July 18, 2019 CCPC minutes) July 18, 2019 Page 23 of 55 COMMISSIONER FRYER: Yeah. So let's -- COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: But this is the -- I mean, I don't know that you have to say it, but -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I don't think it hurts, but then I don't know -- I mean, I'm not -- I don't know what it hurts to leave it like it is. We don't -- we're not going to design something that's not safe. It just doesn't make any sense. If we did, the liability would be tremendous. So even to think that's kind of -- by putting safe in here, it's almost telling us we're not going to be safe unless we write it in. I don't necessarily agree that's needed, but it's not a -- COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: I think it might conflict sometimes if you can do something to make it -- there's a lot of issues in that area. And if you can make it easier for them to walk in doesn't necessarily mean it's going to be as safe as you think it will, so -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: So that's kind of why my question originally -- COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: You cross it off -- you can't do it because it's not safe. I mean, there's a lot of area that was designed without sidewalks or safety, and there's the schools. It's just hard to -- that's the whole reason the study was done. COMMISSIONER FRYER: I'm sorry. Are you objecting to the inclusion of the word? COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: I don't think it's necessary. That's all. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Ned, I know you work -- you focused on some of these, but what difference does it make? We don't have ordinances and designs of anything that we're doing that's going to even consider that we're trying to do something that's not safe. That's a given in al l of our languages. So by adding the word, I'm not sure -- that means -- would almost mean wherever we don't put that word in front of something that we're not considering safety. This generality is good enough. I'm not against it. I just don't know why we need it. There's a difference there. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Well, when we get on bicycles I'm going to say -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, that one's going to be even touchier. But bicycles -- we shouldn't even allow them on the road system, but that's another argument. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Wooo. Uh-oh. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Well, I'm going to ask for it to be in there and if that -- COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Here comes Stan. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Okay. I go to Page 17, and I have two points on this. And I bring this up again. This concept of neighborhood churches. I know that that's to be deferred to the Land Development Code amendments, but it just seems to me to be -- unless we get some kind of an idea of how we're going to accomplish this lawfully and constitutionally, why don't we at least address this now is what I'm asking? Neighborhood churches. And I'd be glad to expand upon why I think that could be troublesome if anybody doesn't understand. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I think it needs to be in here. I think it strongly needs to be in here, and I think this will give us the ability to define it in a manner that we won't be inundated by these churches that are really out of character for the communities they're being placed upon. And I've experienced it because I live out there, so has, I know, Karl, and a lot of us out there have this concern. So this is the beginning of an ability to -- at least to put some mild control in in regards to how these are framed for the area they're in. Mega-churches just don't work in a neighborhood. COMMISSIONER FRYER: And I do not disagree with you as a matter of my personal preference, but let's say that a church wants to hold a public meeting of some sort, and it is limited in -- or might arguably be limited in how widely it could advertise for attendance to that, whereas a nonchurch would not be limited because it's not considered a neighborhood venue. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I think you just gave a good reason why we shouldn't allow that in a neighborhood. I mean, why would we want to make it a gathering place for a broader area when it's not designed to be that? These quiet neighborhoods, especially in the Estates, are not all set up for this. 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 27 Attachment: 7-18-2019 CCPC Minutes (9761 : July 18, 2019 CCPC minutes) July 18, 2019 Page 24 of 55 Mike? MR. BOSI: And -- Mike Bosi, again, Planning and Zoning director. This is one of the areas we did want to have a little bit conversation with the Planning Commission regarding the request to include neighborhood churches. To define neighborhood churches as being a pertinent or provided for within the Estates was really initiated by the Estates Civic Association representing the rural estates. So this was one of the questions that we wanted to engage the Planning Commission. Did we think that this qualification for neighborhood churches should be extended both to the urban estates as well as to Golden Gate City because of the unique characteristics of each of those geographic areas. We've just applied them to each of the subareas. COMMISSIONER FRYER: I think that the characteristics are sufficiently different that we don't need the word here in application to the city or to the urban estates. And, you're right, this came up because the president of the civic association raised it and seemed to have considerable support behind him for the uniqueness of the rural estates. So it seems to me that this should probably come out here in any event. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, Anita, when you went to the stakeholders in the city, was this in there? MS. JENKINS: No, it was not in here. This -- the neighborhood definition for churches came at the transmittal hearing for the Board of County Commissioners when Mr. Ramsey, representing the rural estates, handed a piece of paper to the Commission with a list of -- it seems like there was a search for "church," and every time they found that, they inserted it without the thought of, you know, is it in the city or the urban area. But staff would agree that the rural estates being represented by the civic association, it would be appropriate for it to be in rural estates, but that kind of extends their boundaries of their own membership to the city and the urban estates. So it was not in here when we went through the public participation process for the city or the urban area. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: So you don't know if they're objecting to it or not? MS. JENKINS: No. There has been no contact from any of the representatives of the city or the urban area to object or support the word "neighborhood," but the staff would certainly support not having it in the city because of the different characteristics of the city. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: And how is the characteristics of the city different in regards to whether it's a neighborhood church or a mega-church as -- for a contrast? MS. JENKINS: Right. So the city is a more urban area where you would expect more urban services and a walkable area. So they might need those services in closer proximity. So the -- you know, the Catholic churches there that grows larger and larger and provides lots of services. So, I think, you know, it would behoove us to understand if that's really appropriate in the city with those different characteristics of an urban area and the opportunity to have a little bit more urban services in that area. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Anybody else? COMMISSIONER FRYER: I'd like to know what the County Attorney's Office has to say about that. Not the urban/rural question, but just -- let's just talk about the rural estates and including it there. Is that a constitutional issue? Is it potentially so? Is it something that we shouldn't worry about present time because we can deal with it later? What's your position on that? MS. ASHTON-CICKO: Well, throughout the Golden Gate Estates elements -- I'm going to just group them all under that category -- there are -- there's neighborhood commercial, and there's limitations on the size of five acres or less for certain commercial. So I think we have established a neighborhood concept for commercial and, therefore, we can also establish a neighborhood, you know, for commercial -- 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 28 Attachment: 7-18-2019 CCPC Minutes (9761 : July 18, 2019 CCPC minutes) July 18, 2019 Page 25 of 55 COMMISSIONER FRYER: So size -- MS. ASHTON-CICKO: -- for churches. COMMISSIONER FRYER: -- of the establishment is what we're talking about as opposed to occupancy limitations? MS. ASHTON-CICKO: Well, I don't think it's been defined yet. It's going to be defined when you go through the Land Development Code, and we'll be working closely with staff to make sure that we believe that what we've written is legally defensible. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Okay. In that case -- go ahead. MR. BOSI: And I would echo the sentiment of the County Attorney. And the lead that's provided for neighborhood commercial and the design of neighborhood commercial is in terms of the reach, the outreach in terms of which that commercial is designed to establish. So the scope of that neighborhood commercial is much -- limited in terms of the overall size because it's only supporting a one-to-three-mile radius in terms of where the customer base is designed from. So the neighborhood church concept will follow that same type of lead that it's only designed for a specific radius of area and, therefore, the size and the overall capacity of the churches are commensurate with what we would expect for a limited scope of reach in terms of membership. COMMISSIONER FRYER: I understand your point. And it could, I think, probably be addressed constitutionally in that fashion. So we'll just -- I guess we'll have another bite at this apple when it's at Land Development Code, will we not? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well -- but let's back up. I mean, the city didn't -- wasn't approached with this from the stakeholder meetings. You told me they just weren't. They didn't ask for this. So I kind of tend to agree with Anita that the neighborhood could be dropped from the city on the premise they're not involved in it. It was from the Estates. The Estates is the area that I know for a fact is being inundated with churches larger than should be necessarily out there attracting areas -- from other areas that are far beyond the neighborhood reach. If the city is an urban area and has a different content, and they haven't brought this issue up for themselves, I don't have a problem with dropping it, Ned. COMMISSIONER FRYER: I agree with the Chairman. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: It should be dropped. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Yeah. I mean, that's where I was going in asking the questions. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Yeah. I would go farther, though, at least raise the question about the urban estates. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: No. Karl, do you guys like the churches in your neighborhood coming in like they are? COMMISSIONER FRY: Absolutely not. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: No, I didn't think so. None of us do, because the people are -- churches are seeing -- they want a cheap, large piece of land where you can build a big church. Go to the rural -- to the Estates areas anywhere, and you can build a church there. And that's fine. But they're bringing in people from all over, and they're not neighborhood. They're not -- their sizes are becoming really difficult to handle. The volume of traffic is not a neighborhood traffic component at all. The hours of operation, the types of uses they're bringing in as far as special events, none of them are conducive to the neighborhoods to the extent they're now bringing them in at the sizes they're bringing them in. And that's the issue we're trying to further ferret out when we come in for the LDC language. But, likewise, I would have to agree with Anita that I haven't heard the city make any comments about it at all. I mean, that's a different animal. That's one reason the city is separated out, and I think that's a good move. COMMISSIONER FRY: May I ask for a clarification, just to understand this? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Sure. COMMISSIONER FRY: I mean, in our -- I'll just say in the urban estates where I live, a lot of 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 29 Attachment: 7-18-2019 CCPC Minutes (9761 : July 18, 2019 CCPC minutes) July 18, 2019 Page 26 of 55 churches are very good neighbors. I think what you're describing is more of a church that tends to be a mega-church where they're really attracting a large group of people from a wide radius. Where in this master plan are mega-churches intended to go? What is the appropriate location for mega-churches? Or will it be defined from a standpoint of, you know, they're conditional uses based on the surrounding communities will define whether it's an appropriate location for a church that is not just a neighborhood church? MS. JENKINS: Yeah. So each church would have to go through the conditional-use process where you would have all that information that you would be able to evaluate the surrounding conditions and if it's appropriate or not. When we go through the Land Development Code to define neighborhood, what neighborhood is, it might have a limitation on the number of seats or the square footage or what other activities can be going on rather than just the service. So those things will be defined in the LDC, the criteria that would define neighborhood. But what we're saying is, you know, we're trying to increase the level of service in Golden Gate City. So you might want not to put those neighborhood restrictions in the city where the services would be more needed and -- COMMISSIONER FRY: That makes sense to me. In reference to Golden Gate City, that makes sense to me. I guess my question is, is it inappropriate to have a mega-church out Immokalee Road sitting on 20 acres where they're not surrounded by neighborhoods? I'm just trying to understand. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Yeah, that's ag zoning. It's a different animal, yeah. I mean, it's a -- however -- again, it would be a conditional use out there, so we -- that's what the conditional use is for is tailor it to the use applied to the area that's being asked for. So that's how we would do it. COMMISSIONER FRY: So we are -- if we remove the word "neighborhood" from the Golden Gate City, that leaves it open for what type of churches can operate in the city? MS. JENKINS: Correct. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: They'd still need a conditional use. COMMISSIONER FRY: Still need a conditional use. So they have to pass all of the current requirements and be compatible with the surrounding communities. MS. JENKINS: Right. So if we define neighborhood church, for instance, as, you know, let's just say 250 seats -- I'm not saying that's the right number. Just throwing a number out there. So 250 seats for a neighborhood church, you might not want that limitation on Golden Gate City. They might want 500 seats. COMMISSIONER FRY: But the definition of a neighborhood church will become part of the LDC? MS. JENKINS: Yes. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Eventually. MR. BOSI: And just let me add that in our internal discussion we were hoping that the Planning Commission would remove the neighborhood church from the Golden Gate City and let the individual conditional use bear its own results. But we do see the value in terms of leaving it in with the rural estates and in the urban estates because as we define those -- what those conditions are, those extra conditional-use evaluations that would be applicable to those facilities, we have the support of the Growth Management Plan to at least reference the concept that neighborhood churches are the type of facilities that want to be promoted within those two areas and leave the conditional-use process to be the bearer of the determination for the city. So we're in agreement with where the Planning Commission seems to yielding on this issue. COMMISSIONER FRYER: So, Chairman, it sounds like we've got close to a consensus, possibly a consensus to remove it from the city. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I don't think anybody's objecting to it now that we've had the discussion on it, no. I think everybody's on the same page, yeah. Thank you. Yeah. Go ahead, Stan. 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 30 Attachment: 7-18-2019 CCPC Minutes (9761 : July 18, 2019 CCPC minutes) July 18, 2019 Page 27 of 55 COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Could I -- yeah, this is just a matter of curiosity. Would the census tell me how many different religious denominations there are in Collier County? MR. BOSI: No. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Okay. Thanks. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay, Ned. COMMISSIONER FRYER: My next comment goes to the same page, Line 37, Page 17. It seems as though we've specced in a particular provider, Golden Gate Urgent Care, in the "such as." Is that really what we want to do? MS. JENKINS: You know, that was language that was in the current master plan maybe defined at the time of 2004 when the last update was done, and we just didn't make any changes to that. So we don't object to removing it or making any changes to that if it's helpful. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Or you could just say "such as an urgent care facility" instead of "Golden Gate." That way it's -- because you've got Naples Community Hospital, you've got Physicians. We've got all kinds of stuff. And by the way, I just caught it's 10:30. It would be an opportunity to break. Come back in 15 minutes and resume. I think with the way this is going today, we might get done around noon or work through noon to finish. We'll have to see if we get closer to that hour before we decide what to do, so. (A brief recess was had, and Commissioner Chrzanowski is absent for the remainder of the meeting.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay, everybody. If you'll take your seats, we'll move forward and see where we're going to go by lunchtime. And we're on page -- we left off at Page 17 of the city part of Golden Gate Estates Master Plan. Go ahead, Ned, you were -- COMMISSIONER FRYER: Okay. I go to Page 18, and it's Line 23. In no case shall the maximum permitted density exceed 16. This is a draftsmanship question, but I think it would be more accurate if you said in no case may the maximum permitted density. It's just draftsmanship. COMMISSIONER FRY: Is draftsmanship a word? COMMISSIONER FRYER: Yes, it is. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: By the way, before I forget, I had an announcement to make. Do you remember Scott Stone? He left us. Do you know who's here now? Sally. So if you had -- and, Sally, your last name? MS. ASHKAR: Ashkar. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Sally just recently got married, too. MS. ASHKAR: Yes. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: And Sally's our new assistant county attorney, and she is taking Scott's place. So you'll all be seeing a lot of her, and she's very talented, like Scott was. So we've got a good replacement, and everything should move very smoothly. COMMISSIONER FRY: And I'll add that she has an affinity for cheese peanut butter crackers. MS. ASHKAR: Yeah, I was eating peanut butter when I just met him. My mouth was full. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Karl does that to everybody. He waits till you start eating, then he'll jump in. COMMISSIONER FRY: I saw my opportunity, and I seized it. MS. ASHKAR: Making a great first impression. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Go ahead, Ned. COMMISSIONER FRYER: All right. MR. WEEKS: Mr. Chairman? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Yes. MR. WEEKS: David Weeks of the Comprehensive Planning staff. I would suggest we not change the word "shall," and the reason for that is to maintain 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 31 Attachment: 7-18-2019 CCPC Minutes (9761 : July 18, 2019 CCPC minutes) July 18, 2019 Page 28 of 55 consistency. We have the same terminology in the Future Land Use Element and, I believe, in the Immokalee Master Plan as well; that if we want to make that change, I would suggest it would be appropriate to do it globally rather than a single -- COMMISSIONER FRYER: I don't feel strongly about it. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Well, let's leave it like "shall" then. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Okay. I go to Page 19. And in Line 45 -- and you can all jump all over me again on this, but it says provisions for bicycle and pedestrian travel, and I feel a lot stronger in the case of bicycling that the word "safe" should be added in there. Let me say why. There was a story on May 30th of '19 on Fox 4, a local story, that indicated that the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration said 16 percent of the 783 cyclists who were killed in the United States in 2017 were killed on Florida roads. Now, it's a problem down here, not just Collier, but all of Florida. And I think it behooves us to be thinking about this, and what we can do is at least add language to raise a level of awareness and concern. And so I'd put the word "safe" in front of "bicycle and pedestrian travel." CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Now -- and I spoke out about this a minute ago not knowing where this was headed, but here's my concern: I don't think there's any way, unless you shut a lane down completely and put a barricade between any other lanes in the roadway, that it's going to be safe for bicyclists to be on a paved travel lane for vehicles. Not because they're wrong. I know what the law says. They have a right to be there. But because vehicles don't seem to like that idea too well, and people are getting hurt. And the bicyclists, quite a few that I've seen, don't pay a lot of attention to cars coming behind them. Sometimes they'll go two or three abreast, they'll go up to the center of the line, which means you've got very little bit -- way to get around them. There's too much happening when you put bicyclists on the same road system that vehicles are on. So if I was opposing this as a -- someone -- trying to represent somebody who was injured and the word "safe" was there, I'd simply say, how could you possibly testify, anybody can, that a road system that's got a three- or four-foot wide little path along the right side on a lane that's going 55 miles an hour is safe for a bicycle? It simple is not. Then I drove down 951 the other day, which everybody was going 55 and 60 -- and here's this little tiny strip of lane. Guess what I saw? A guy with a kid, a kid in a bicycle behind him, because the kid could be there. This is not safe. It can't be safe. It couldn't be safe under any circumstances. To insinuate that it's going to be safe because we said, put the word "safe" in front of the bicycle and they're going to go out there and use that lane, I think, is really putting something in somebody's mind that is absolutely false. And if we encourage them to do that without making these roads safe, which I don't know how we can without shutting down one lane of every road in the county, I don't know how to get there, Ned, and that's what worries me about putting that word there. I'm not against being safe. I'm against the premise that people think it's going to be safe and it's not. COMMISSIONER FRYER: I acknowledge your point of view and -- MS. ASHTON-CICKO: Do you want me to go first? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well -- MS. ASHTON-CICKO: Well, rather than placing adjectives to describe, you know, what kind of sidewalks or pathways you'd like to see, you're better off, since you're the land planning agency, to make some sort of recommendation to the Board. If you feel that the pathway should be separated from the roadways, you can make a recommendation that they look into that type of thing for their plan. But as has already been discussed, you know, we design our roadways in accordance with state and federal standards, and safety is one of the factors that's considered. COMMISSIONER FRYER: I just -- this whole concept of complete streets, I think, is dangerous. In many respects it could be a great thing, but it's such a safety problem in my view -- it can be for both bicyclists and pedestrians, and also it does cut down on automobile traffic, which in certain 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 32 Attachment: 7-18-2019 CCPC Minutes (9761 : July 18, 2019 CCPC minutes) July 18, 2019 Page 29 of 55 areas is going to have a negative effect on local commerce. But -- well, I feel like I've had a full presentation and conversation about this, and I take your point about not wanting to give plaintiffs' lawyers an opportunity to sue. Maybe we can't fix it by a language change here, but it -- to me, this is a serious problem. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, you know, the professional bicyclists -- and I guess Stan bicycles -- they understand the challenges of being in that lane that they're in, but ordinary people thinking, okay, well, this is a safe bicycle lane, they won't think about that as much. They'll think, well, if the government says it's safe, we'll jump right in there. I'm just worried it's going to -- it's going to advertise falsely a situation that we can't protect, and I don't wish anybody ever to be in those lanes on our road system. I think -- we have a lot of drivers who are distracted, and we try to put laws in to stop texting and everything else, and people are getting hurt, and it's not right. We should be giving bicyclists separate lanes or separate paths to travel in, and then that would encourage exercise, it would encourage all the things that bicycling brings with us. To encourage them to use the road system like it's being used right now in any kind of attachment to a travel lane is dangerous as ever, and I don't think it could ever be safe. So that's why I'm concerned about it. COMMISSIONER FRYER: I share your concerns. To me it's a broader issue than just putting the word "safe" in there. It's an issue of the concept of complete streets. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Maybe that's the concept we ought to be pushing under a different venue than trying to fit it into this. COMMISSIONER FRYER: I'm fine with that. I've said my piece. I go all the way to -- well, now it's -- where am I? Looks like I'm in -- I'm in -- I'm done with city. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Anybody else have any city questions? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I've got some. MS. JENKINS: Okay. I was just going to point out that there is -- in the city document there is one more reference to neighborhood church. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, they all should come out of the city document. MS. JENKINS: If we don't need to point it out to you, I'm good with that direction. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: No, just take it out. If we go to Page 21, Line 13 through 23, you're adding to the Golden Gate City activity center a lot of industrial uses. I don't know of anybody in the city that suggested this is appropriate. I've tried to contact a few people I know there. They said no, they were never aware of this being proposed. I would strongly suggest that we don't need to do some of the things you're suggesting here. The textile mills, the cutting and needle trades, some of those heavier technologies and laboratory research facilities and things that are beyond the scope of a C1 through, say, C4 operation or even C -- I'm not sure why these are coming up now. We were very careful, and we had a lot of city participation when we did the first write-up, and we had those uses there that were very specialized for the city purposely because that's what the city wanted. I'm trying to figure out how this got in there. Do you -- MS. JENKINS: It was in there during transmittal. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I know. MS. JENKINS: So we reviewed it then. And it was in there. We were talking with the city during the public participation about expanding economic development and job opportunities, because you have a high concentration of people within a short walking distance, and the jobs are basically in retail sales in Golden Gate City. You have about one mile from the access of I-75, so there's an opportunity to provide more jobs 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 33 Attachment: 7-18-2019 CCPC Minutes (9761 : July 18, 2019 CCPC minutes) July 18, 2019 Page 30 of 55 just within the activity center alone. Are these uses going to be allowed? The Land Development Code that will be modified and brought back to you will be more specific to what those uses will be in the activity center alone. So it's an opportunity to create something like Arthrex at a different scale in Golden Gate City to provide for more jobs in closer proximity to where people are living. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, we can go through -- go ahead, Tom. MR. EASTMAN: To follow up on Anita's point, the school district has recently leased property in Golden Gate City for a startup of the Center for Manufacturing Excellence. And it's my understanding that the Center for Manufacturing Excellence will have a permanent home by joint work with the county and some of the local community colleges. And I think it comports with exactly what Anita's describing. It's more like an economic development and job creation initiative, and I think Mike has something to say as well. MR. BOSI: And this corresponds to the designation of that area as an innovation zone. An innovation zone is supported by the qualified targeted industry that we're trying to get components to 21st Century type of manufacturing that we -- that we know creates higher paying jobs and provides for economic opportunities to a -- to an area that has a higher population of workforce within the surrounding area. So this has been -- and it was part of the public meetings that we've had these discussions, had the Jace Kentners at the Golden Gate Community Center. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Jace doesn't -- what would he know about Golden Gate City as far as living out there? Did he live in Golden Gate City? MR. BOSI: No, but describing the type of uses that are being promoted by the Board of County Commissioners -- the Board has already designated this area as an innovation zone. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: But they're not promoted by the people that live there. I talked to some of them. They didn't even know about this. For example, 2211, broad woven fabric mills, cotton. There's over 100 -- probably 100 uses of types of manufacturing different types of fabrics. And these are mills, establishments primarily engaged in weaving fabrics more than 12 inches in width wholly and chiefly by weight of cotton, establishment primarily engaged in weaving and tufting carpet, and it goes on for two pages. 2221, broad woven fabric mills, manmade fiber silk. Then 2223 -- 31, broad woven fabric mills, wool. I mean, dying and finishing. What kind of stuff is that for the downtown of a city? And the area that this is in is right next to the Catholic church. I mean, how does that make any sense? MR. BOSI: And I would remind the Planning Commission that this is an overlay that is in the Growth Management Plan, and to incorporate any one of these uses, you would have to go through the zoning process and the compatibility, and the analysis and the appropriateness of any one of these uses would be part of that zoning request. So what we're doing is providing increased opportunities for job creation. And I can understand and I most certainly appreciate the concerns of a wrong fit within an area that wouldn't support a textile mill, but it is a right fit for a small manufacturing facility that employ, say, 3D printing or 21st Century type of technologies, so -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I'm not even there yet, Mike. I'm not even to the 3D printing, and I'm reading things that are just obnoxious for a downtown commercial area. It just doesn't make any -- finishers of broad woven fabrics, finishers of textiles, yarn and thread mills, yard texturizing. It goes -- mixed -- miscellaneous textile goods. All kind -- burlap, carbonized rugs whatever they are, crash linen. What kind of stuff is that to be popping up in the middle of Golden Gate City in their one activity center? MR. BOSI: I think those are uses that, unfortunately, are part of that SIC code range, and -- but in terms of a market reality, in terms of how those uses could be -- would be arrived upon. They would 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 34 Attachment: 7-18-2019 CCPC Minutes (9761 : July 18, 2019 CCPC minutes) July 18, 2019 Page 31 of 55 have to go through a rezoning process, but also on the other side of that, the converse side of that is, is there a marketplace for a textile mill within Golden Gate City? I don't believe so. I don't think the Planning Commission would think that that would be appropriate from a rezoning process. I don't think the community would think that that would be something they would support during a rezoning process as well. So I understand the concerns on some of these other uses. It's just this was to fulfill the direction of the designation of the innovation zone that the Board has designed to create economic opportunities for the area and, obviously, the Planning Commission can most certainty have a different perspective. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: It doesn't matter to me what the Planning Commission does. I can tell you what I'm going to do. I can't support this kind of activity in downtown Golden Gate City. I think it will make it -- it will actually depress the city, not help it. I think it's wrong, and I'm just not going to go along with it. If it means I vote no on the entire urban section of this, I will do so. This is not thought out. If you guys have a specific milder mindset in mind, then that needs to be in here, not this broad reference, because this broad reference is going to have somebody arguing in front of us that, see, it's in the GMP. We're allowed to do it. And they'll twist the language into something you never intended because we didn't make our intent clear. MR. BOSI: And I -- and I guess the -- and most certainly whatever the Planning Commission -- we will take to the yield (sic). But this was part of the transmittal documents, and these type of discussions -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: What did I say in transmittal? I said, well, I'm assuming the city people and the stakeholders have vetted all this, and they must be on board. MR. BOSI: It was part of the public. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, that's not what I've been hearing now, so -- and between transmittal and now, there's been a little more time to look into this than there was in transmittal, Mike, so -- I understand your position. You're doing what you have to do, and I'll do what I've got to do going forward. Anybody else? Go ahead, Tom. MR. EASTMAN: I agree with you, Mr. Strain, regarding a textile mill, and I think the language could be narrowed. Are you opposed to a modification that would still allow some of the more advanced or light industrial, more technologically sophisticated uses for that job-creation component that's trying to be gained here? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: No. What I'm against, Tom, is the broad argument someone could make with the way this is written and the manner that we've always -- we've constantly approached. Everything's being squeezed into this county right now, and people are looking for loopholes to argue things we never ever intended, and this is the kind of stuff that produces that, and that's what I'm against. I don't disagree with you. I think the intent that I'm hearing from Mike and Anita could probably be tailored right to fit, but I'm not going to suggest that it's -- okay, we'll just leave this broad language here. It's not what we really mean. We really mean something different. We'll define it in the LDC. We've been trying for that, and it's not working anymore. There's too many ways to get around that. We're learning that as we go forward, and I'm not willing to go there again if I can help it, so... MR. EASTMAN: And I certainly agree with you regarding the broad scope. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you. I don't know how you want to handle this. I guess -- I don't know how -- if you want to come back with better language, but it means we wouldn't get through with this today. I thought we were going to get through with it today. I thought this -- if this wasn't -- if this was something this wasn't necessary, since I don't know how it came about -- if it's just our Economic Development Department saying they want to do this for Golden Gate City, that doesn't carry any weight with me whatsoever. I'm looking at the residents in the community that need to be adhered to. That's the people that 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 35 Attachment: 7-18-2019 CCPC Minutes (9761 : July 18, 2019 CCPC minutes) July 18, 2019 Page 32 of 55 I'm concerned about. And I haven't heard from them specifically that this is what they want. I have heard from the couple that I've talked to that they didn't know about this. But then again, nobody's here today either, so that's a little disappointing. But I personally think this is wrong. I won't go along with it. But it doesn't mean -- you've got five people up here, so I'll just be one of the voices that call attention to it, and we can go forward. We'll see how it plays out today if you'd like. MS. JENKINS: Sure. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Or if you want to come back and provide a better description of what you're intending here so that we can lock it down tighter, I would greatly be in favor of that. But I'll let you decide that before we finish today. MS. JENKINS: Okay. COMMISSIONER FRY: Mark, are you proposing to strike that whole section and no reference to SIC codes and industries or simply to remove some of the ranges that are in there? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: No, I think they ought to be solicited -- we ought to go through them like Ned goes through some of the language pieces. We ought to go through these with a fine-toothed comb and say -- because this is the future of that area. This will be the future of how that city develops out. And I know how -- as things get tighter and land gets more valuable, people are going to try to find ways to argue all around things. So I think this needs to be written more tightly because of the magnitude that this could open doors for versus other ones that are very specific. This is not specific at all. I don't have a problem with call centers, but at the same time call centers -- we do have other sections of the GMP that put limitations on size. Maybe we ought to be looking at that. If the intent is we're looking at small facilities, you know, a couple operators to answer phones, I have no problem with that, if that's classified as a call center, but then if you go to call centers and it's got something broader than that that we never intended, I don't want to open that door. I'm worried that our GMP's done that too much in the past that we didn't expect that we're seeing now. We're getting changes that I wouldn't have anticipated in all the years I've been here, but we're getting them, and I think we need to tighten it down. I don't want this community to change any more than we intended. MS. JENKINS: And, Mr. Chair, that will be tightened down in the Land Development Code. There's an overlay. So if there's some size restrictions in advanced manufacturing only -- the challenge that we're having is we're using a very outdated SIC code for manufacturing techniques that aren't necessarily defined in that 1980s document that -- there's new definitions of that that we're not allowed to use today because we're using SIC. So that's part of our challenge as well is trying to explain these new manufacturing techniques in an old -- you know, in old standards that we're using. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well -- MS. JENKINS: But it will be tightened down in the Land Development Code in the overlay. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Can we say only these? Only 3D printing? MR. BOSI: Well -- and one suggestion would be to eliminate the SIC codes and just use the shells of the advanced manufacturing and automated peril and eliminate the SIC codes that reference 19th Century-type facilities. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: That would help, but I think we ought to limit it in a size that's conducive to the area that it's going in. I mean, you mentioned Arthrex. If Arthrex ever, ever thought they were going to put a 600,000-square-foot finishing facility in downtown Golden Gate City like they have out in Ave Maria, I think that's not a good fit, and I don't think that's what you intend. But I think if they were to put a small-scope operation like they're doing with their highly-rated -- the equipment they build, that's nice. That would be -- I just want to make sure we're on the same page with the intent that would come out of this GMP, and it couldn't be twisted. David's been here a long time. He knows -- how many times have I brought up trying to change 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 36 Attachment: 7-18-2019 CCPC Minutes (9761 : July 18, 2019 CCPC minutes) July 18, 2019 Page 33 of 55 the whole code over to the next facility -- next system? Every single time it's not gone forward. Every single time we've tried, and every single time there's been some dollars involved, consultants involved, but never ever, ever happened. It's brought up way too many times. Joe Schmitt was director when it was brought up one time. He remembers it. We could never get traction. Before Jace was in charge of economic development, the other fellow that was here, he brought it up. We tried it again then. We actually got pricing on what it would take. Couldn't get it done. It is so complicated because all of our PUDs have all those SICs in them. We have 450-plus PUDs. The commercial components all are relevant to the SICs. Now you go back. You're changing property rights in some person's minds because they have this broad SIC number, and we're trying to say, well, that's not what we intended. We actually intended what the NAICS says, and it's a much finer-tuned number. Well, that's not what I intended. Now we run into trouble. That's been the trouble. That's been the hurdle we can't get past. So I agree with you, it's an antiquated code, and because of that we've got to be more careful, and that's why I'm concerned about this. MS. JENKINS: So I think we originally added the SIC codes at your request, Mr. Strain, so -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, I'm glad you did, because now I know what you mean, and I don't like it. MS. JENKINS: So maybe if we remove that and you can see the details in the Land Development Code as specifically, you know, out of that full list what might be allowed in the square footage to that, maybe that would help move this along. MR. BOSI: And I would say that -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Yeah. MR. BOSI: -- G provides a good description as to what the intended purpose of these uses are for. So as you would be going through a rezoning process, not only the groupings that we would suggest without the SIC codes -- but G says, other uses as determined by the Board of County Commissioners consistent with the intent of supporting economic development in Golden Gate City. And I think the intent of -- the purpose of these uses and what they're trying to provide for within this -- within this urbanized area, as you point out, doesn't support a yarn manufacturing facility but could support a 3D printing facility that employs five people that has no internal influences upon the neighbors. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: And, Mike, I don't disagree with you in part of that. The other part is you just pointed out another problem I have. And maybe I'm gotten too cynical being here too long. But with the intent of supporting economic development in Golden Gate City, do you know that anybody could make that an argument in their favor? And you would hear it from all those applicants wanting to come in saying, we're going to bring two more jobs to Golden Gate Estates. Even though we're a heavily pollutant battery acid development business, we still are going to bring two jobs; therefore, we are supporting economic development. I just want it -- I would like to see this tighter. And with these SIC codes -- and I see where you're heading -- now I -- there is a very big concern, so... I don't know -- I would suggest if we remove the SIC codes, knowing now where these are on record as to what you were thinking, so the intent of those codes is there, I think that would also require some additional fine tuning of what you're referring to when you say advanced manufacturing and automated apparel. I mean, you don't mean sweat shops, obviously, but you mean something of a nature that we have in other parts of the GMP limited in size. So just provide that flexibility that we could address it that way so we know that we're not going to have something outrageous there. That's my concern, so unless anybody -- COMMISSIONER FRY: Well, I definitely -- it sounds like the SIC codes paint us into a bit of a corner down the road, and so I certainly concur with removing the SIC codes. But, Mark, that is not enough for now. In order to finalize this, you'd like additional definition put on the text as well? 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 37 Attachment: 7-18-2019 CCPC Minutes (9761 : July 18, 2019 CCPC minutes) July 18, 2019 Page 34 of 55 CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, the SIC codes provided a window of understanding what the intent was, what was -- where we're headed. Now that we know that, I think that's exactly the concern. And if we're going to leave without the SIC code -- which is probably a better idea now that we know what these mean -- we further refine advanced manufacturing to some capacity, size, something to get us to a limitation. MR. BOSI: Could we add a descriptive component within -- within this section to say uses appropriate and rightly sized to be conducive to the mixed-use environment in which they will sit? Because that's where this is -- this is only allocated to the activity center. That's the mixed use -- the mixed-use activity center. So if we reference within the GMP appropriately -- the use appropriate in the context of a mixed-use activity center -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Compatible. MR. BOSI: -- its size -- and compatible with the mixed-use activity center recognizing that means commercial -- that means commercial, that means residential, and that means some of these job-creation opportunities. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Yeah, that would get us there, Mike. MR. BOSI: So that gives us at the GMP level the guidance that -- the specificity and the scrutiny that's going to be provided at the rezoning has to be appropriate toward those other mix of uses in which it's going to share the same space. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Compatibility to -- (Simultaneous crosstalk.) MS. ASHTON-CICKO: You know, this is existing language that's in the Growth Management Plan. I prefer that you address it as Anita is suggesting through the LDC amendment or through a rezoning because I don't want to take away people's rights. Now you're going to force them to be in a mixed use. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: That's exactly the argument I'm worried about. I'm glad you said that. That's the piece that I'm concerned about. So if we -- if -- how do we limit it so we don't open it up to all these SIC codes to the extent they could be, Heidi? MS. ASHTON-CICKO: I think just going back to the original text and not addressing it through the Growth Management Plan. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: So we would drop all of the underlined and crossed-through language? MS. ASHTON-CICKO: Yes, correct, through -- Lines 13 through 25. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Is that the original text prior to the transmittal? MS. JENKINS: So the original text -- MS. ASHTON-CICKO: Yeah. You'll just take out the strikethrough and underlines. MS. JENKINS: Yeah. The strikethrough/underline was what the CCPC recommended through transmittal. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Right. But prior to transmittal, what did we have? MS. JENKINS: You had the language without the strikethrough/underline. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. But, I mean, the transmittal didn't -- David? MR. WEEKS: Lines 13 through 25 are not in the existing Golden Gate Master Plan. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: That's what I was trying to understand. Okay. That's the piece I was trying to get. COMMISSIONER FRY: So we could strike -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: That's where I'm trying to -- yeah. MS. ASHTON-CICKO: Oh, I'm sorry. You're working off the strikethrough and -- okay. Gotcha. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I think there's two levels of strikethrough and underline. One 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 38 Attachment: 7-18-2019 CCPC Minutes (9761 : July 18, 2019 CCPC minutes) July 18, 2019 Page 35 of 55 disappeared after the transmittal; is that a fair statement? MS. JENKINS: That's correct. COMMISSIONER FRY: So if we strike those lines, we leave it up to the LDC to -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: No. If we strike those lines, we still are adding all this as untested, basically. MS. ASHTON-CICKO: Okay. So this is all new text. So you could tinker with it if you want to. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: That's what I -- MR. BOSI: So what we would do is we would -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Let's go back to where Mike was suggesting. MR. BOSI: -- remove the SIC reference and then put a qualifier that these uses that are being promoted would have to recognize the mixed-use environment in which they are intended to reside and the compatibility analysis would be required based upon the type of uses and based upon the mix of uses that are anticipated within the mixed-use center. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Yeah, that would get us -- COMMISSIONER FRYER: I would add the concept of proportionality as well as compatibility. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, that's fine. Good. MR. BOSI: Yes. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Could -- now, we're probably going to need all -- we're going to have to have another review of this but not to this extent, just a redline review for the changes we're asking for today to make sure you caught them all. That would be a shorter attempt, but at least let's go through all this stuff today. So I would suggest we go with what we just talked about. And I think, Mike, if you could make -- help with that, that would be real beneficial. MR. BOSI: Sure. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you. Thank you. That gets us past that page. I had a -- oh, just a -- Page 22, Line 32. How much -- is Line 32 -- where did this -- because it says, within one year of the effective date of this subdistrict, which the subdistrict was, I assume, then, one of the ones that was created back -- MS. JENKINS: Yeah. There was no changes to the subdistrict. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I know, but one year of that subdistrict is two decades ago, isn't it? MS. JENKINS: (Nods head.) Right. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: You kind of know where I'm going. What do we do with this? I mean, why put something in here we're not going to meet when we haven't met it for 20 years? Why don't we just start with the word "the" and drop that -- stop putting that "one year" in there because it didn't make any sense. Anybody have a problem with that or -- David? MR. WEEKS: I don't have a problem with it. What I mean by that is the State no longer has the level of review that they did prior to 2011 and, historically, we had to have objectives that were measurable, and to leave this wide open to simply say we'll do it. By "lack of specificity" means whenever. Historically the State would have said, you can't do that. You've got to specify. But because they no longer have that authority, it becomes a local decision. That's what I meant by no problem. If we remove that language as you're suggesting, I don't think we're going to have any compliance issues with the State. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. I'd just as soon remove it, because it's just making it look like we're not doing what we're supposed to do, even though we aren't. But still, why make it that apparent? MR. WEEKS: And just for the record, it's not that staff has totally ignored this requirement. There was an effort back in the, I believe, early 2000s to create such a zoning overlay, and it got bogged down, at least in part, because of some plans for power lines to be relocated, and there was a decision, well, if the road's going to change, if the power lines get moved, you know, the property's going to be 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 39 Attachment: 7-18-2019 CCPC Minutes (9761 : July 18, 2019 CCPC minutes) July 18, 2019 Page 36 of 55 affected, let's don't try to -- let's wait till that gets resolved because we start trying to plan this overlay, and it's just been dormant since. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I'd just as soon drop it then if we don't -- and that's the last issue I have on the urban -- the city part of it. Anybody else have anything on the city? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Let's move into the urban, if that's okay, Anita. MS. JENKINS: Yes. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: And, Ned, do you want to start out the urban or, Karl, either one of you got -- COMMISSIONER FRYER: Sure. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Karl lives there, so I figured maybe he'd want to start it out, if he's got specifics. COMMISSIONER FRY: Okay. I'm looking at Page 1,888 in our packet. Let me find that and tell you what page number that is. Page 16. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Does anybody have anything before 16? As we go through, we'll keep up with Karl, but if we've got something before where he starts -- Karl, I've got one. It's on Page 11, Lines 33 through 35. It's interesting that in the urban estates, this -- those lines were crossed out but in the rural estates they were left in. Do we know why? MS. JENKINS: Sure. It's redundant. A conditional use requires minimum votes in our LDC and in the administrative code, so this is redundant to what's already required for the approval. Knowing that the rural estates seems to be a little bit more adamant about repeating things like that, we left it in there, as we heard from the civic associations out there. But it is redundant. So if we want to remove redundancies in these Comp Plans, this is one area to do that. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, the part that I kind of like about leaving it in, it's a little bit harder to take it out if they do a broad brush to take things out but it's still in the GMP for some specific sections. It stays there until the people get wind of it, and then they can express themselves again. I'd rather leave this in. It's better protection for the neighborhood. COMMISSIONER FRY: Agreed. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: And, Karl, you're on Page 16, so let me make sure I get there. On the next page, Anita, Line 8, Policy 117, it's one of the few times that GGAMP is still there. You should -- I think you mean the urban area of the Golden Gate area, however you reword things. That -- in the ordinance, the adoption ordinance you fixed it. MS. JENKINS: Okay. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I'm just telling you it's not fixed in this version. MS. JENKINS: Okay. Thank you. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: So Page -- I've got a couple more, Karl, then I'll let you have it. COMMISSIONER FRY: Sure. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Page 15 -- no, that's already taken care of. So now we're right where Karl is. Okay. We're on Page 16 then. COMMISSIONER FRY: Page 16, Policy 3.1.3, Lines 45 through 48 on that page. I mean, it's a wonderful concept, and I wondered if there has been progress made on this already in terms of interconnected trails and paths. This is about greenway -- interconnected greenway corridors in the urban estates. People to move about the Estates by means other than motorized vehicle. Is that something that is in the works? I'm curious how that would be achieved. A lot of the urban estates are cut off from each other, and I'm not sure how I see an interconnected corridor of greenways as being possible. MS. JENKINS: That was something that was brought up during your public workshops specifically with urban estates as well. They were very interested in trying to figure out a trail system throughout the urban estates, so that's why we made sure it was left in here. 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 40 Attachment: 7-18-2019 CCPC Minutes (9761 : July 18, 2019 CCPC minutes) July 18, 2019 Page 37 of 55 Now, the MPO did just update their bicycle and pedestrian master plan, which may have more of a greenway network. Transportation planning for Collier County may be looking at those opportunities as well. So is it in the works yet? I don't know of a specific plan, but we know that if it's in here, in the Comp Plan, then that gives us the ability to move it forward to transportation planning as well. COMMISSIONER FRY: I happen to -- I mean, I agree strongly with Chairman Strain's observation that the bike lanes along a fast-moving motorway is not exactly safe. I would personally never let my child ride their bike down a road like that. So it would be great to have a separate network of biking and hiking/walking/running trails. Something I think we're missing in Collier County. I'd just like to see this have some teeth rather than just be something -- a couple words in a document. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I'd like -- that would -- yeah. If we could make that happen, this county would be golden. But go ahead, David. MR. WEEKS: Just one additional comment that sometimes when we have language such as this in our Comprehensive Plan, it can be advantageous when the county seeks grants because then we have one additional piece of information. Look, our Comprehensive Plan recognizes this. It gives it a little more weight. COMMISSIONER FRY: Great. Thank you. I have minimal comments. The other comments I noticed is that there -- I'm going to go Page 1,925, which -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Page -- COMMISSIONER FRYER: I've got one before that. COMMISSIONER FRY: Go ahead, Ned, if you'd like to. If you want to do it in order. That's my next one. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I think that would be easier. COMMISSIONER FRY: Absolutely. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Mine's on Page 37, which is 1,990, and it has to do with this cellular thing again. And I just don't see how we can tie our hands, particularly since the availability of cellular service and quality cellular service has become a public-safety issue. We don't know where the dead spaces are going to be, and I don't think we should be limiting ourselves at this point where we put up or allow the cellular towers to be put up. And that specifically goes to Line 12 and following on that page. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: What page are you on again? COMMISSIONER FRYER: That is Page 37. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: No, we haven't got past Page 19 yet. Wait a minute. COMMISSIONER FRY: We jumped far ahead. COMMISSIONER FRYER: We jumped pretty far ahead. Karl -- COMMISSIONER FRY: I was going to jump even farther ahead. But I do have a comment on Page 36. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Oh, okay. I thought you said you jumped to Page 19. MS. JENKINS: I did, too. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Page 37. COMMISSIONER FRY: My page numbers are based on this, you know, longer document, so I have to get to that page and then relate to your page number. So, yeah, I'm well down the road. But I do have a comment on Page 36, so whenever we get to there, I will jump in again. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I'll tell you what. We better go back to -- you go finish yours, then Ned, and then me. Because I can't -- we can't follow where the pages are. COMMISSIONER FRY: If you don't mind jumping around at least with the page reference, we should all be on the same page. So looking at your Page 36, it's transitional conditional uses. Looking for clarification here because there's a lot of language here. So let's say that you have a main roadway and you have a church that is approved along that main roadway between that and a 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 41 Attachment: 7-18-2019 CCPC Minutes (9761 : July 18, 2019 CCPC minutes) July 18, 2019 Page 38 of 55 residential area or Estates-zoned area. I think the concern that I find common in my neighborhood and I'm sure in others is that leapfrogging of nonresidential uses deeper and deeper into a neighborhood. For instance, here is a church, and then now we have this commercial enterprise that is somehow using its abutment to that church, which is nonresidential, as a way to encroach further into the neighborhood. Is that limited -- in what ways is that limited in this plan is my question. MS. JENKINS: David, you've been dealing with that, haven't you? MR. WEEKS: If I understood you correctly, you made reference to a new conditional use coming in piggybacking on an existing church. COMMISSIONER FRY: For a rezone to commercial but based on the fact that traffic is getting to it, you know, adjacent to a nonresidential use such as a church or another conditional use. MR. WEEKS: Okay. For this transitional CU provision -- for a subject property to qualify for this transitional conditional use, it has to be adjacent to a nonresidential use. But the nonresidential use that it is adjacent to cannot be one of the conditional uses allowed in the Estates zoning district. So what that means is let's say an ALF wants to come in for a transitional CU. That ALF cannot -- a parcel, proposed, cannot be next door to another ALF or a church or a daycare center or any of those Estates zoning district CUs, otherwise you would have a continuous piggyback right down the street. So it has to be next to a commercial use, for example, or certain types of essential services. Right in your neighborhood on Immokalee Road where the fire station is at, as you know, there's a church on each side, and that's how they got there. They were next to that fire station. That's the end. The next parcel over on each side of those churches cannot come in for a transitional conditional use because the two churches themselves are Estates conditional uses. COMMISSIONER FRY: Okay. So in that way you limit the piggybacking of similar transitional conditional uses, and it limits the leapfrogging into a neighborhood? MR. WEEKS: Correct. I mean, so it's site specific. In your particular neighborhood, I think you're referring to one street south of Immokalee Road where there's -- COMMISSIONER FRY: Possibly. MR. WEEKS: -- really old -- there is within your neighborhood, I'll just say, an old commercial building. And by virtue of it being there, the two parcels adjacent to it are eligible for this transitional conditional use. To my knowledge, there are no other commercial or essential services within that two sections of Estates between Immokalee Road and Vanderbilt Beach Road that would allow for further encroachment. It would take a Comprehensive Plan amendment for any other conditional use to be going within those two sections of land. So that's what I mean by site specific. There happens to be one other commercial property in your neighborhood, so that's how -- if you want to call it encroachment, there would be some further encroachment allowed of transitional conditional use. COMMISSIONER FRY: My concern is on a greater level; it really is for all the residential neighborhoods where there seems to be -- you know, something gets approved, and then somebody applies for a rezone or a master plan amendment for something adjacent to that. And I think there is fear out there that the system allows that encroachment and the piggybacking to continue deep into the neighborhoods. MR. WEEKS: Well, what's built in here is that if a new commercial property occurs, that is a Comprehensive Plan amendment and then the rezone to establish a new piece of commercial zoning within the Estates, then those two adjacent properties would be eligible for the transitional CU. So if I understood you correctly, you're correct that there's a linkage. So a new commercial or a new essential service such as a fire station goes in, voila, we've opened the door for conditional uses next door to it. That's the way the text works. MR. BOSI: But I would add that when this Planning Commission has had those requests -- and, specifically, I believe it was Southbrooke -- they added an imposition that this -- that new commercial use would not allow for the adjoining parcels to qualify for transitional conditional uses. 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 42 Attachment: 7-18-2019 CCPC Minutes (9761 : July 18, 2019 CCPC minutes) July 18, 2019 Page 39 of 55 So this Planning Commission has made provisions, when they've had that particular use and they thought it was appropriate, they put limitations that leapfrog could not be added to it. So that's been something this Planning Commission has been aware of. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: But the PUDs that -- or the conditional uses are amendments or changes to the Land Development Code. Can they, then, override the ability for the GMP to say transitional conditional uses are allowed? MR. WEEKS: No, because the GMP governs. So if the GMP says you cannot qualify for a conditional use here, then that's it. It's dictating to the LDC your process doesn't apply here. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: No. But I think what Mike's saying is that the transitional conditional uses that would normally be allowed against new commercial -- like Southbrooke, you could stipulate in the PUD for Southbrooke that they weren't -- oh, that was done in the GMP. MR. WEEKS: Correct. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Good. That's what I was double checking. MR. BOSI: That provision was provided in the LDC. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: So we're not overriding -- the LDC can't override the GMP, and the GMP would then be consistent because that's what the -- (Simultaneous crosstalk.) MR. BOSI: The GMP informed itself that these -- that that transitional conditional-use aspect could not be applied to those parcels of land. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: We didn't put it in the PUD. We put it in the GMP. MR. BOSI: Put it in the GMP. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Gotcha. COMMISSIONER FRY: So to summarize, there is really no restriction on the ability to rezone properties within a neighborhood commercial and, in fact, by doing so, opening up the future prospect of additional transitional conditional uses deeper into the neighborhood. MR. WEEKS: Okay. Two things. One, for most locations within Golden Gate Estates, it would require a Comprehensive Plan amendment to get to that commercial rezone. If you're outside of a neighborhood center, that's just about the only location for commercial. And as Mike was just explaining, when that Comprehensive Plan amendment occurs to create the ability for commercial zoning, the county does have the ability to say this transitional CU process will not apply for these adjacent properties. The result being, if the plan amendment is approved, okay, you've got new commercial zoning, but you cannot have conditional uses next door unless you go through your own plan amendment. COMMISSIONER FRY: Thank you. Thank you for clarifying that. The only other thing I have is that there's reference to the Southbrooke PUD. Let me get you a page number for that; 1,925, which is 53. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I can't figure your numbers -- you've got a completely different number system. COMMISSIONER FRY: The number above the footer, the footnote, is 53 on that particular page. So it's talking about if I -- Lines 12 through 14, it's talking about minimum 30 feet in width of the vegetated buffer. Now, that does not match what I believe was submitted. And my question is this: I have documents from that time when the developer committed to and we supported them or we did not oppose them in return for a 45-foot vegetative buffer, plus 30 feet of water management area planted with trees and a wall and a lot of other requirements. So this is a -- I think an inaccurate reinstatement of just a small part of the conditions on that PUD. And I'm curious why -- how is it decided that this little bit of detail would be included but not referencing the greater detail that's in the -- in what was approved. And it doesn't match what I believe was negotiated. MR. WEEKS: I don't recall. I'm going to assume, you know, what you're saying is accurate, and 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 43 Attachment: 7-18-2019 CCPC Minutes (9761 : July 18, 2019 CCPC minutes) July 18, 2019 Page 40 of 55 maybe the PUD has that greater level of detail. The amount of detail we put in the Comprehensive Plan varies widely. What we are required by statute for a plan designation is to identify the allowable uses and the intensity or density. COMMISSIONER FRY: Okay. MR. WEEKS: That's it. We don't have to put in any type of development standards. And you'll see subdistricts that contain some development standards such as this, some that will contain far more, and then some will contain none. But about your specific question is, should that -- should Lines 12 through 14 be replaced with a more general statement that setbacks and vegetative buffers are defined within the approved PUD documents or the approved master plan amendment documents, rather than have a very limited and possibly inaccurate restatement? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: These are minimums. The fact that we -- we negotiated a better system in the PUD may be why there's a discrepancy. These are just minimums, so this was a bottom-line protection. In the PUD we actually got more concessions out of the developer for the neighborhood. COMMISSIONER FRY: So this in no way overalls -- the PUD will overrule -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, there's nothing to overrule here. It says the minimum. They're at 45, so it's not overruling it. It's consistent with it. (Simultaneous crosstalk.) COMMISSIONER FRY: All right. My concern was that this somehow would override and reduce their requirement to 30 feet, but it's -- the PUD documents are the ruling document in this case. MR. WEEKS: Because it's more restrictive, which is allowed. And further, as a general comment, I would -- because this was a subdistrict established by a private sector amendment, historically our protocol has been to leave it alone, because the applicant paid and went through the process to get this language adopted in the plan, so we usually take the approach let's leave it alone. COMMISSIONER FRY: Okay. So you reference a few other subdistricts in this, and you have general comments as well similar to this. I don't know whether they're accurate or not, but what you're saying is in general it's the PUD that's more restrictive, and so this does not overrule anything that might have been negotiated by those neighborhoods with those developers. MR. WEEKS: Correct. Another example will be with uses themselves where -- go back to the mixed-use activity center we were discussing earlier. The activity center allows C1 through C5 zoning. It allows it, and individual rezoning within the activity center could be more restrictive as far as the uses allowed. COMMISSIONER FRY: Great. Thank you. That's all I have. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. And I don't have anything else in that. Ned? COMMISSIONER FRYER: I want to go back to cellular because I don't think we finished that, did we? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: No. I think we -- yeah, let's go back to it, just to be sure. COMMISSIONER FRYER: That was on Page 37, and I -- my concern is in Line 12 through 14. I just don't think the county should be limiting itself, given the public-safety importance of cell phones nowadays, to where we could put up towers and where we can allow towers to be put up. MR. BOSI: There was a lot of discussion about expanding where telecommunication towers can go within the urban estates, the rural estates, and even prior that there was recognition that putting a tower deep into a neighborhood was something that was not supported by the general public, and they only wanted those opportunities to be on your collector and arterial roads. Of course, that -- if it's the purview of the Planning Commission to go out and engage the community and see if that's -- that's changed, but -- COMMISSIONER FRYER: Well, I think we should reserve the ability to address it because it's a public-safety issue. It's not just an aesthetics issue. It's a public-safety issue. MR. BOSI: All -- telecommunications towers are essential services so, yes, it is part of public 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 44 Attachment: 7-18-2019 CCPC Minutes (9761 : July 18, 2019 CCPC minutes) July 18, 2019 Page 41 of 55 safety. COMMISSIONER FRYER: So why wouldn't we want to just keep our options open rather than have a limitation in here, which is what this Section 5 is? MS. JENKINS: And those limitations were a recommendation by the Planning Commission, and that's how that language changed to make them adjacent to collectors -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: That was in the Estates group. Yeah, they were vocal on that, too, if I'm not mistaken. So I don't have a problem with the language that's written. I understand Ned's concern, but then if someone wanted to put a tower out there, they could change the location, but they could bring forward a small-scale plan amendment to be able to do that so they could have a conditional use, whatever use they wanted there, to be able to get that to happen, couldn't they? MS. JENKINS: They could. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Yeah. It's still not locked out. It just makes it another step that the community would have to be involved in. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Okay. Let's see. That's all I have in urban. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Me, too. Anybody else got anything in urban? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Let's move on to rural. It starts on page -- who knows what page. I'm not even going to get into that. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Page 1. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Page 1, yeah. Page 1 of the last 40 pages of the document, I think. COMMISSIONER FRYER: I think those of us who are following the other pagination, we're on 1,928. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: You know, on Page Roman Numeral VI, the Immokalee Road/Randall Boulevard planning study area, that's been added as a map to the rural area. Just out of curiosity, why? Doesn't that go out beyond the Estates and go south? I forgot. How did this get added? Can you -- MS. JENKINS: It was at your request. We referenced -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. I just want to make sure. MS. JENKINS: And it was requested let's just put the map in so everyone understands -- (Simultaneous crosstalk.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Because you referred to it in the text. MS. JENKINS: Yeah. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Yeah. Okay. That's fine. I just wanted to make sure. I don't remember all these things. I'm glad somebody else does. I don't really have any questions. Does anybody else? COMMISSIONER FRYER: In rural? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Yeah. How do you like that? COMMISSIONER FRYER: I go to Page -- Karl, jump in, but I go to 1,959 on yours and my pagination. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: What's mine? What page number's on the bottom; do you know? COMMISSIONER FRYER: I'm getting there. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Oh. Well, while they're looking, Anita, I took the language that you've given us that's redlined and compared it to the previous break apart of the system -- of the two sections, rural and urban. Now -- and I highlighted the pieces that were different, but the differences I saw were language in paragraphs that talked about map sections that applied only to the urban area and language in paragraphs that applied, map sections, only to the rural area. And, for example, the overlays, you have the Golden Gate Estates shopping. That's only in the rural area now. And you have Southbrooke, and that's only in the urban area now. That I expected. That separates the two pieces out so they're -- each piece has got all of its pieces together. But there's no 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 45 Attachment: 7-18-2019 CCPC Minutes (9761 : July 18, 2019 CCPC minutes) July 18, 2019 Page 42 of 55 unique language change to each one of them other than calling them the urban and the rural. I thought -- I thought there was going to be a purpose to separating them out. MS. JENKINS: The maps? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: No. The text. MS. JENKINS: The text? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: The text is the same text, just moved in one or all in the other or if it's common to both, in both, but nothing's changed. COMMISSIONER FRYER: I thought that's what we asked for. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, I'm trying to understand the benefit of it, because I always worry that somewhere down the road someone's going to say, well, the urban area of the Estates is urbanized, it's more modern, but the rural area, those folks are just the rural people. Let's just put some stuff out there we wouldn't put in the urban area because now we have two areas where we can put stuff we don't want in the other. And I may be cynical again, but I'm worried that the urban -- the rural estates is going to start getting singled out for operations, uses, and things that will be avoided in the urban estates and the old conquer-and-divide principle comes into play. Now, we've got the urban estates folks. Well, that's going to the rural estates; we haven't got to worry about it. And the rural estates people stand on their own again. I don't know the basis why this is being done. I think the city moving out of this is great. I think it's a really good move, and it should have been done a long time ago. In the urban area, being not really thought out how as far as definition, everything east of -- and you'll see this when we get into the ordinances. Everything east of 951 is rural and everything west is urban, but yet if you go to 951, especially north of Golden Gate Boulevard, east and west is identical. The people on the west can't get anywhere unless they go out to 951, and the people on the east can't get anywhere unless they go to 951. Yet the benefit of being the urban estates, according to the preamble in the ordinance, is that they have easier and quicker access to the coastal area. How does that make anything any different? I mean, there's no -- I just -- I keep looking for the reason for all this, and I can't find it. MS. JENKINS: The reason was it was Board directed. COMMISSIONER FRYER: That's right. That was the trifurcation discussion. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: But why? Does anybody get feeding -- I mean, actually, I didn't -- I don't -- unless I'm in a really good mood, I don't watch the Board meetings because they put me in a bad mood, and I don't want to start out in a bad mood and get worse. Does anybody know why other than we just think it ought to be called this way? Because, honestly, when we drew the lines, to think that east and west of 951 is any different when they all use 951 and they're separated by that canal from the rest of the urban area, it doesn't make them cohesive. You can't get across those canals. So you've got to drive all the way up to 951, all the way to Immokalee Road, and all the way back down to Oakes or somewhere like that. Why are we doing this other than conquer and divide the groups that are out there? I mean, I just can't figure it out. I thought it would show up in this language. That's why I wanted the redline. I couldn't figure out what you changed last time to make all this worthwhile. Now I realize you changed nothing. You just moved the pieces around. MS. JENKINS: Right. Yeah. And the trifurcation was to divide out the difference subareas and with the thought that it would provide the civic associations in the different areas the ability to help push their own future forward, right? So if the rural estates has a different vision, different future for themselves, then they can more easily define that. And I think you kind of see that now that it's trifurcated that the urban estates doesn't have as much vision as the rural estates has had historically, so it's an opportunity for them really to 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 46 Attachment: 7-18-2019 CCPC Minutes (9761 : July 18, 2019 CCPC minutes) July 18, 2019 Page 43 of 55 define their future. So past the Board direction and that explanation, we were directed not to make any additional language changes beyond the minimum to help guide us are we in urban and rural. So we were not directed by the Board to change any other language, so we did not do that. We were not directed by the Board to make any map changes, although we will make some suggestions to you to take back hopefully with your recommendation to the Board to make the maps a little bit cleaner in that fashion. But that's the best explanation I can give to you, Mr. Chair. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. I have this very cynical outlook on things that are done like this, and I'm trying to figure out what the agenda down the road and how this could be used in a manner we didn't anticipate; kind of like the questions I've asked today on the city part, I still worry about that. I haven't got a handle on this other than understanding why it's done now a little bit, and how it's done. It just doesn't still -- I still don't know why it needed to be. But, David? MR. WEEKS: Just one specific comment I remember the Board chairman making -- and he's the person that proposed the trifurcation. He had made the statement that I want these separated into the three separate areas so that you can amend one area without affecting the other. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Oh, I understand that, yeah. And I just didn't know what those anticipated amendment thoughts were, and I'm trying to figure out what's anybody got in mind. And I always try to think a little bit ahead like that to know what to anticipate, and I can't figure this one out. That's what kind -- I thought of maybe talking about it. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Chairman, if there are specific concerns that the cynical side of your personality might have that should be addressed, maybe they would go in not the sub-elements but in the main element. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Maybe, and I don't know of any yet, because I haven't heard anything necessarily that's proposed other than the fact we're just going to go on and see where it takes us. But -- and I'm still willing to go with that. I just was hoping to get a little more refinement to the idea. I haven't figured it out yet, but okay. Karl. COMMISSIONER FRY: Well, I think you bring up a good point. If you're trying to define the areas by differences in their nature, then the dividing line of being 951, it sounds like it really should be farther east where it's -- those properties that are to the west of 951 -- I'm sorry, farther east, yes. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Past the canal. COMMISSIONER FRY: Those properties that are east of 951 but that really are part of the 951 system should all be part of the urban estates. Is that -- are you going in that direction because I -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, that's what I was thinking. That's why I was trying to think this whole thing out. Where is this going and what does it mean? Because say you guys decide you want to go on, heaven forbid, city or county sewer and water. You'd be a logical first step, and I would hope that you would really think about that, because it does have a lot of expensive connotations to it and then other requirements you may not like. But say you were to do that, and all of a sudden you say, yeah, that urban estates is going to go on, well, then the people in the rural part of the urban estates, which is on the west side of 951, are all going to be caught up in that, and that, to me, is no different than what then could snowball in -- rolling over into the rural estates where we really don't need that. But those are the kind of pieces I was trying to figure out how this all works together, and that's why that one chunk of land west of 951 but not part of the urban -- COMMISSIONER FRY: West or east? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: West of 951 but east of the canal. You know the big canal that separates your neighborhood from the other parts of the Estates? Well, actually, it's Logan. No, I don't know what 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 47 Attachment: 7-18-2019 CCPC Minutes (9761 : July 18, 2019 CCPC minutes) July 18, 2019 Page 44 of 55 it is. COMMISSIONER FRY: You mean the canal at the end of my neighborhood? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Yeah. There's a -- no, on the -- along 951 to the west, north of Golden Gate Boulevard, you have rows of streets just like you have in all the rest of the Estates. They all dead-end into a canal down at the end, and you can't get over all the way to your area with those. It's that area -- there it is. See the area of Golden Gate Boulevard, not all -- not all that goes over to Logan. You can't get to Logan. There's some canals or something through there. But that area generally isn't your area. You're up by the corner up by I-75. Our area can't get over to Logan. We can only get to 951. That's the piece I was talking about. Those areas that can't reach over to Logan, they're restricted to go on 951 to go in and out. They're no different than the rest of the Estates. I just thought it was -- I don't know why you'd put them in the urban estates. It's done that way. And, again, I'm not suggesting we need to change it. I'm just trying to figure out how it's going to help anything. But okay. That was just a discussion. I didn't know if anybody could give me better information than I already had. Who's got any questions on the rural estates? Anybody? Ned? COMMISSIONER FRYER: I do. Let's see. It's on Page 26, which is 1,859 in our world. COMMISSIONER FRY: Thank you. COMMISSIONER FRYER: And it has to do with at least three repetitions of the phrase, "This provision only applies east of Collier Boulevard." I think that's superfluous now that we have trifurcated; it appears in 9, 13, and 14. MS. JENKINS: I agree. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Okay. Let's see then. MS. JENKINS: It doesn't make any sense anymore. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Okay. It looks like I go to our Page 965 -- or 1,965, which is going to be, for the rest of the world, Page 32. 1,965; 32. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Just out of curiosity, when you say 1,965, you've got 1,965 pages? COMMISSIONER FRYER: Yeah. This is the entire packet. COMMISSIONER FRY: More than that; 1,981 pages. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Really? COMMISSIONER FRY: But who's counting. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, holy cow. I just don't know -- I didn't know that that's how big it was all collected together. Wow. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Okay. This is at the page -- as I said, whatever it was I said -- 32 at the -- in Line 9, this is, if you look at the previous page, a list of things that are to be allowed. And so Sub F is an item that sort of is all by itself is an item to be prohibited, so it's just a drafting question. I think it -- substantively, it needs to be prohibited, but it shouldn't be among the things that are listed to be allowed. MS. JENKINS: And that was another private amendment. So it's something that we didn't change through the restudy to affect that private amendment that was done some time ago. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: But possibly for the next EAR it could be considered to be clarified. MS. JENKINS: And we can move it around if it's helpful. COMMISSIONER FRY: It's up to you. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Doesn't matter to me. COMMISSIONER FRYER: It's not a substantive question that I have. It's just a drafting question. And it's in orange right in there amidst the apples. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Or lemons. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Or lemons, yeah. MR. WEEKS: I agree. Because that's not a substantive change but it's a cleanup, I think that's 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 48 Attachment: 7-18-2019 CCPC Minutes (9761 : July 18, 2019 CCPC minutes) July 18, 2019 Page 45 of 55 fine that that staff -- the county can make that change. That would be an exception to the protocol because it's not of substance. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Okay. All right. I go to 1,973 for Commissioner Fry and me. COMMISSIONER FRY: Oh, I have a question on two pages before that, Ned, if I should jump in. On Page 38, your No. 38, Estates shopping center subdistrict. I guess I maybe need a little bit of a history lesson here. We were talking about SIC codes earlier, and on the following page, Page 39 is a very long list of SIC codes for allowable uses within that area. And I'm just curious, how did that list come to be; whereas, we've avoided SICs elsewhere, why do we have a very long list of SIC codes here? MR. WEEKS: This was a very extraordinary project. It went all the way to the level of including a nonbinding referendum before the Comprehensive Plan amendment was taken to public hearings for final action. And a lot of -- a lot of community involvement, a lot of concern, and I think the real point of it all was let's put all this detail in the Comprehensive Plan; it will make it more difficult to change it in the future. We're hearing all of these assertions of what the developer wants to do. Let's tie their hands to it, and we'll do it in this way to make it difficult to change it. Whereas usually we would have this level of detail in the zoning document which is easier to amend. That's the answer. MR. BOSI: And just let the Planning Commission know that the Board took actions in terms of a land swap within their last public meeting. And you will be presented with amendments to this section of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan as well as an area that covers 47 acres at the Immokalee Curve. So you can anticipate further amendments to the -- or to the Golden Gate Area Master Plan based upon the Board's actions for a land swap that they agreed to in terms of exchanging commercial at the Estates location to a -- to the Immokalee Curve location, and the specifics of that are yet to be determined and finalized. COMMISSIONER FRY: So in contrast to the SIC codes we were discussing previously, which you included as an attempt to answer a question, this is a highly vetted previously approved list of SIC codes. MR. WEEKS: Yes. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: They're not ranges, though. COMMISSIONER FRY: They're specific. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Yeah, that's a big difference when you deal with SIC. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Hear me out first. COMMISSIONER FRY: I'm finished. Thank you. COMMISSIONER FRYER: I go to the very same concerns that Chairman Strain was raising about SIC codes. I think when -- in a perfect world, from my perspective, when developers insert SIC codes, they should insert what's permitted only so that if it's not expressly permitted it's considered prohibited. But the way we proceed, I understand, is, unfortunately, quite frequently different. Now, on this page, 40, you have SIC Code 7389. And a lot of the ones ending in 9 are this way. Business services not elsewhere classified. Well, have we vetted everything that that's covered? Because I'll tell you one thing that's covered. Bail bondsmen. Now, I can't believe that these folks would want bail bondsmen. MR. WEEKS: What I don't know is whether the PUD for this subdistrict includes that same SIC code listing as it is or if it has more specificity. As you know, sometimes in zoning documents, PUDs will identify an SIC code and then only allow certain uses within or prohibit certain uses within. I don't know how this was treated in the zoning document. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Well, to me, it shouldn't include bail bondsmen, so I'll just say that. And, likewise -- a little farther down on Page 43, you have SIC Code 6163, and it's called loan brokers. And I looked that up, and it includes payday loans. 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 49 Attachment: 7-18-2019 CCPC Minutes (9761 : July 18, 2019 CCPC minutes) July 18, 2019 Page 46 of 55 MR. BOSI: And, once again, I'll remind this Planning Commission, this entire section's going to be removed from the Golden Gate Master Plan based upon the action of the Board of County Commissioners. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Okay. Okay. All right. So I'll stop there. MR. WEEKS: And, again, this is private sector generated, and these are substantive changes you're discussing. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Well, I just -- I think that if people -- if the public, if you will, knew about how general some of these things are, they would say, we don't want that. I'm confident they would. But if this is going to be taken out in whole, then I don't need to address all of the rest of these. In fact, I am finished, Chair. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: While we're finished, the only thing we've got to do is go through the ordinances, and most of everything we talked about is those. We can move through them pretty quick. I'd suggest we just work a little bit longer and wrap up the review of this today. Is that okay with you guys? And, Terri, are you good for another 30 minutes or so or less? Okay. And anybody have anything else on the rural estates? MS. JENKINS: Mr. Chair, would you like to go through some of our suggested maps that would go along with these sub-elements? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Are they maps that you included in the ordinances or not? MS. JENKINS: No, because we were -- we were asked not to make any changes to the maps that are attached to the ordinances, so you'll see that the rural Golden Gate Estates map is the same Golden Gate Area Master Plan map with just rural estates and East Estates. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I saw that. MS. JENKINS: Or urban estates, sorry. But we would recommend, as we've shown here, to create a map that is specific to the sub-element. So when we're speaking about the urban -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Yeah. MS. JENKINS: -- rural estates, the map is just for the rural/urban estates. So if that could be part of your consideration. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I would highly think that would be a good idea. So you've got a map like this for each area? MS. JENKINS: Yes. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: The city you've already got one for. I saw it in the ordinance. You've got -- this one, then, would be for the urban area, so it clearly defines the urban area or the urban estates area. Then the next one for the rural area would include everything, but would it not include the Area 5 to the south since that's no longer active, or were you just leaving it there for -- because it's there? MS. JENKINS: We are leaving it there because it's there, but it's shown in green, you know, and defined as what it is. So, historically, that's been part of your rural estates. So, you know, it's there. We can remove it. It is referenced in the text, though. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I like the maps. I like -- it's a good idea. Does everybody else? COMMISSIONER FRYER: I agree. COMMISSIONER FRY: Yeah. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Is that the only maps you'd had? MS. JENKINS: There's one more, Mr. Chair, that -- there is the Golden Gate Estates commercial infill subdistrict, and that was one map, the infill subdistricts, which included one in Golden Gate City and two in the urban estates, and we would -- we have those maps if you'd like to see them, but we would recommend breaking those maps out as well. So the one infill district for the city is the city not showing the urban estates and vice versa. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: That's one of the things I noticed on the ordinances. There is a map in there that's kind of confusing because it calls out some changes in the city, but they're on the section for 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 50 Attachment: 7-18-2019 CCPC Minutes (9761 : July 18, 2019 CCPC minutes) July 18, 2019 Page 47 of 55 the urban in the -- is that -- MS. JENKINS: Right, and we would recommend making those changes. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I don't have a problem with that. I think it's a good idea. Why don't we move into the ordinances. Have you all looked at the ordinance language? COMMISSIONER FRYER: I have not. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Has anybody here got any questions on the nine ordinances that adopt everything that we're looking at? COMMISSIONER FRY: No. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Because if you don't, then I'll move through mine a lot quicker because I'll just go at it and tell you what I'm thinking. Okay. And let me tell you the first one I've got a question of. It's -- I don't know how to describe it. It's the adoption CCME. Is that -- does that get you where you need to go? And it's only four pages. The very last page has a paragraph in it; Policy 6.1.1. Policy 6.1.1 has a big underlined sentence. I need someone to tell me what that sentence means. I know -- I've read it. I just can't understand what it is trying to do. COMMISSIONER FRYER: While that's being looked, Mr. Chairman, could we ask Troy to bring in that device so that we could see on the screen what you're looking at. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I bet you he's not even listening. He's probably gone to lunch. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Oh, okay. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I'm just kidding. If, Troy, you hear this, let's give it a try. That's a good idea. MS. JENKINS: I'll be happy to put it on the overhead as soon as I find it. That's all. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: There he is. That little device. MR. MILLER: I would never be asleep during the meetings. It's fascinating. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I know. That's why I figured I'd get your attention. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Fascinating. COMMISSIONER FRYER: That is one nifty device. And this way we can see what's on the Chairman's screen. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: He's got a little thing that's got to pop up. There it is. MS. JENKINS: That's stormwater. COMMISSIONER FRY: It could be potentially a very embarrassing device. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Troy, what do I do? I've got the -- oh, it's connected just now. It just was delayed a bit. That's okay. MR. MILLER: You push the button on the little thing. There you go. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Good idea, Ned. There it is, 6.1.1. See that underlined sentence? What -- does anybody -- can anybody explain what that means? MR. WEEKS: Yes. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. MR. WEEKS: Ordinarily for a property of that size, it says up to 13 acres, if you go to divide that, it would trigger the subdivision regulations. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Right. MR. WEEKS: And one of the things that would be required would be to have a preserve area. And the purpose of having this defined as a single-family dwelling unit, then it would not trigger that requirement for the preserve area. There's very few large parcels in the Estates, but that's what it's for. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: That could even -- this apply to. Okay. That what I -- that takes care of my question on that one. MS. ASHTON-CICKO: David, does that apply to both the urban and the rural Golden Gate Estates? 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 51 Attachment: 7-18-2019 CCPC Minutes (9761 : July 18, 2019 CCPC minutes) July 18, 2019 Page 48 of 55 MR. WEEKS: It would, although my recollection is those parcels of that size only exist in the rural estates. MS. JENKINS: It does reference as designated residential estates. So the -- it's still designated as residential Estates in both urban and rural, so -- MS. ASHTON-CICKO: I just didn't know if you wanted to mention whether it was rural or urban since we changed our definitions. MR. WEEKS: No. MS. ASHTON-CICKO: I'd just clarify that. MR. WEEKS: Thank you. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: This is one of the ordinances that was proposed for the -- heck, I don't -- there it is right -- there's your title. 261 is the PL number -- and I had caught this when I was reviewing the language for the SIC discussion we had for the city, and that's why I highlighted it. That's been explained, so I think what this says is whatever those uses turn out to be, they're in addition to the regular activity center uses. But the way David described you're going to write it, they're going to be consistent with activity center uses, because you're not going to be exceeding C5 uses by the time it's said and done; is that right? MS. JENKINS: Well, there could be uses exceeding C5 uses that are light manufacturing -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: But they're smaller and compatible in nature? MS. JENKINS: Correct. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. That works. That's why that was highlighted. So now we'll go on to the next one. Oh, this is a little bit larger. Oh, this is not going to be fun, but it is going to be fun because these are all -- they're not done by me. The PUDF's picking them up as changes made. Urban estates, this is the vision statement that I was telling you about. Golden Gate urban estates is a low density, large-lot residential neighborhood in a natural setting with convenient access to the coastal area. It doesn't. The way it's drawn, not all of it has convenient -- no different access than parts of the rural estates. That's what got me wondering why we're doing all this, because it's not a true statement. Do we need to change that -- MS. JENKINS: Well, those missions and vision statements were created at the public workshops by those residents that were participating during those public workshops -- (Simultaneous crosstalk.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: But they wouldn't have known about the split, would they? Because the split didn't come until after the Board did transmittal. MS. JENKINS: That's correct. They were thinking about, you know, their area of the urban estates, which we have defined throughout our public workshops as the defining line of 951. So that was clear in all our mapping when we were talking to each one, and we had specific workshops in the rural estates and the urban estates and the city, different workshops. So those that were attending from the urban estates created their own vision statement. So we're presenting to you what the public said would be their vision statement. And I think now with the trifurcation, they may want to change that. When they can see their goals, objectives, and policies are stand-alone, it might be an opportunity to say, you know, we need to beef this up a little bit. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. But as it stands now, it's going forward like it is, right? So to change it in the future they'd have to do a GMP, or could you do it during EAR or something like that? MS. JENKINS: Correct, or during the next update of this plan. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Twenty years from now? MS. JENKINS: Sure. COMMISSIONER FRY: You'll still be here, Mark. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I mean, it's not that big of a deal, but that's what caught my concern. 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 52 Attachment: 7-18-2019 CCPC Minutes (9761 : July 18, 2019 CCPC minutes) July 18, 2019 Page 49 of 55 MS. JENKINS: Yeah. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: That's what brought it all to the head, so... Okay. This is the Golden Gate City sub-element, and my issues here were -- I don't have any. That one goes away. And this one here -- oh, the county shall continue to pursue the best-management practices approach to making septage treatment available to residences and businesses in Golden Gate Estates as a component of biosolid processing either directly through a private entity or through a public/private partnership. I just want to be careful that doesn't open the door to the Utility Department -- I mean, the cost to put sewage in Golden Gate Estates is phenomenal. It's $100,000-plus per lot from the last estimate that was done, and that's only on a narrow lot. That's on your smaller lots. So you get to your bigger lots, you're going to be paying more. That's not even reasonable. So I don't know what this is there for, but -- MS. JENKINS: You know, as I recall Kris explaining this to me was that it was to provide better service for your waste that's coming out of your septic system because, as I'm understanding, we're hauling it out of the county now. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. So this is for the hauling. I know that. Tim Nance was working on that. MS. JENKINS: Yes. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. MS. JENKINS: And so septage treatment availability -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Is the treatment of the -- MS. JENKINS: -- biosolid processing. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: -- stuff that's already -- MS. JENKINS: Yes. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Gotcha. That takes care of this. See, I knew this one would move fast. Oh, this is the two years. What is a DWM? Dispersed water management. MS. JENKINS: Dispersed water management. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Yeah. MS. JENKINS: Those are programs -- and they just had actually a pretty good article. DEP increased their funding. Dispersed water management basically is trying to do a new program where you are paying large landowners to hold water for treatment before it flows south into the Glades. So it's -- water farming is dispersed water management. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: But you just said large landowners. Then why is this in Golden Gate Estates? MS. JENKINS: Well, the larger lots that you might have an opportunity to do that is for -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, you're looking at the possibility of mandatory provisions. Did the people in -- this was vetted with everybody? This is -- MS. JENKINS: Yes. Yeah, it went through all of the public workshops and the transmittal hearings as written. So it's just a feasibility study. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well -- but, yeah, then it's -- then they're going to talk about how to implement it through voluntary incentive or mandatory provisions. The part I am concerned about is mandatory. The least impactful lots in this entire county are those in Golden Gate Estates because they're so large. So I don't understand why any kind of dispersed water management is focused on them when we ought to be focusing on all these postage-stamp lots that have 70 percent impervious area, and you can't -- and they're the ones causing all the runoff problems. I mean, it just seems like it's backwards to the approach we should be taking. I just don't know why it's focused on the Estates. I don't understand that. I'll -- well, I'll discuss it with somebody else before the next level and see what happens. Let me run down. Oh, this is the -- I already told you about this. And that was the definition 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 53 Attachment: 7-18-2019 CCPC Minutes (9761 : July 18, 2019 CCPC minutes) July 18, 2019 Page 50 of 55 thing, but you've kind of clarified to me what we're doing on that. This is -- oh, no. This is the urban -- here. Okay. In the urban area we've got Goal 3., to preserve the areas' rural character as defined by large wooded lots and keeping of livestock and the ability to grow crops, wildlife activity, environmental stewardship, low-density residential development and limitation on commercial and conditional uses. I don't mind that being in the urban estates area, but then that's the same as we've got in the r ural area. So what is it we need -- I mean, how does this fit with what they want the change to be, if they want it changed? And if they don't want it changed, why are we changing them? MS. JENKINS: So it is just a repeat of the goal, you know, that goes to the Estates. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Right. MS. JENKINS: And, you know, during the public workshops, the urban area was very much also identifying with that large lot, low residential -- yeah. It -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: This just doesn't -- this just doesn't make a lot of sense. MS. JENKINS: But those are the things now, I think if the urban estates folks come back and go, this doesn't make any sense for us, you know, we see how it's just repeated in both -- because we weren't directed by the Board to specifically change language, only to trifurcate. But this is something they may want to focus now on their own goals and objectives and redefining those slightly. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, like this one, Goal 4, preserve the rural character of the urban Golden Gate Estates. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Why wouldn't you just take the word "rural" out? MR. WEEKS: I'll remind the Commission, though, that though it's been proposed to be trifurcated, splitting the Estates into what we call urban and rural, I think the terminology of urban estates is simply because it's proximate to the urban area. It's still part of Golden Gate Estates. It is still subject to the limitation of density of one unit per two-and-a-quarter acres. It's still part of the same plat that was originally five-acre tracts. It is still what we could call a semirural density. And so -- COMMISSIONER FRYER: All understood, but maybe "semirural" is the better word. I would suggest you just take the word "rural" out. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, you know, I was just pointing it out. Everything I'm finding is so contradictive of what I thought was the reason for this whole separation in the first place. There's no reason now for it. Everything's the same. I just don't get it. But I'm willing to go on and keep walking through this just to show you this, but it's just odd. And that's what gotten me worried there's something going on that we just don't understand. COMMISSIONER FRY: I just wondered if I'm missing something. Is the keeping of livestock a priority for the urban Golden Gate Estates people? I haven't heard that requirement in my neighborhood. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Next-door neighbor is raising them. COMMISSIONER FRY: There are few, I think, goats and horses and things. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I think you're right, Karl, but those are the things I thought would be rewritten since this is the replanning effort, and this trifurcation was part of that effort. So if we're going to do it, why aren't we doing it as a replanning effort and doing it right instead of, well, we'll just split them up now even though they're the same, and then we'll talk about it later. Well, the last time we said this, the later -- it has been 20 years. So I'm just kind of lost in this whole thing. COMMISSIONER FRY: The other thing I see is that in the rural Golden Gate Estates, it sounded like one of their priorities was limited access to services in focused areas, basically. I don't think that applies at all to the urban -- I think we live in the urban estates because we want vast access to -- greater access to resources than if we lived out -- farther out west -- or east. MS. JENKINS: And I think that probably part of their vision statement is easy access to the coastal area. COMMISSIONER FRY: Yeah, and to services -- and to services, I think. MS. JENKINS: Yeah. 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 54 Attachment: 7-18-2019 CCPC Minutes (9761 : July 18, 2019 CCPC minutes) July 18, 2019 Page 51 of 55 CHAIRMAN STRAIN: On this map -- on a couple of these maps it has this notation, that one in blue, subject, site additions, with arrows going down in the city. Why don't we just take that off the map? I mean, I don't know why it's there. This is the urban area map. Why do we have that on -- only referenced as the city? MS. JENKINS: Well, it was like that because when we made some changes only to the urban estates, it will go away as we adopt it, and it will just be the Golden Gate. But, yeah, that was just to show exactly where the -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Yeah. The whole plan's fine, but just where the -- just the language, "subject site additions" with those arrows. Just drop those is all I'm trying to say. Yeah, okay. MR. WEEKS: That goes back to the idea that we did not receive direction from the Board to create three separate maps. And so we're identifying where the changes are occurring. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Oh, okay. Now, I -- I think that gets us -- yeah, all the rest of this is standard. I think that's just about the last one. Yep, it is. So, Terri, that's the last one, kid. So all the other ordinances -- I mean, there's only two left. I don't have questions on those. And I'm -- that's all the comments I had. Does anybody else have any further comments? COMMISSIONER FRY: One observation. There are -- and I just grabbed a few snippets -- a lot of commitments. We went through this in the Immokalee Master Plan where all these -- within one year we will do this, within two years we will do this. And there seemed like there are a lot of commitments in this document as well. Larger notice area, when you have larger properties that have a larger -- I definitely applaud that, but it's a commitment within a certain period of time. Combining parcels, the smaller parcels that are below 2.25 acres. I wondered -- and then also the dispersed water management that Chairman Strain brought up, all these commitments, is there a mechanism by which all these are tracked and to make sure that they are pursued and executed? MS. JENKINS: I'll defer to the manager of the Comp Plan to talk about tracking of commitments. MR. WEEKS: There's not a good mechanism. I can tell you that previously when the state law required an evaluation and appraisal report every seven years, if you weren't doing it more frequently than that, that required it, because we would prepare a report that we'd have to present to the State, and it would potentially be identifying, well, here's a policy where we said we would do something in two years. Here it is seven years later, and we haven't done it. But we don't have a specific tracking mechanism. That's something internally we need to work on. We need to create protocol, and I believe we will, of identifying all of these -- because I know it was discussed some at the Immokalee Master Plan hearing where the other county agencies that would have responsibility for any of these commitments had been consulted; they were aware of and they were on board with. We just need to take that to the next step of a formality of saying once the plans are adopted, if they include these commitments, that we identify these and notify each of these agencies, okay, this needs to be added to your to-do list, because here's the commitment in the adopted Comprehensive Plan. COMMISSIONER FRY: So you're describing a master list of all the commitments within these master plans and who's responsible. MS. JENKINS: And who's responsible. Like in Immokalee, for Golden Gate, we did meet with the managers of each section that would be responsible. The Land Development Code, for instance. Do you have the capacity to initiate these things within one or two years? And the answer was yes, so we left it at one or two years, whatever the statement was in there. COMMISSIONER FRY: One of the things I observed, I think, really does dilute the Estates nature of the Estates area is these smaller lots that are really not -- don't represent really what the Estates is. Large lots. They're very long and very narrow. They're really not ideal for homesites but yet they're utilized all the time. 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 55 Attachment: 7-18-2019 CCPC Minutes (9761 : July 18, 2019 CCPC minutes) July 18, 2019 Page 52 of 55 What methods will be used? It's referenced, the strategies will be developed to combine parcels, incentive programs. What is in mind for making that happen? MS. JENKINS: I don't know that we have anything specific in mind yet, but I think that that's part of going back out and talking with those landowners to develop those incentives to how can we combine these. And also, if there's an opportunity to work with Conservation Collier to look at these small Band-aid lights (sic) and see if there's an opportunity there, if there's, you know, value there to combine those. So those incentives are going to have to be developed through the process of public workshops in the Land Development Code to see what would entice someone to create larger lots there. COMMISSIONER FRY: Can I assume this only applies to undeveloped lots? MS. JENKINS: Yes. COMMISSIONER FRY: Thank you. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. You guys, we're done with the Golden Gate Master Plan. I think we can probably get it off of our plate today. The only thing I'd like to ask, in concurrence with the rest of you, is that one section of the city issue over the SIC codes versus what we really intend there. That's the only part I'd like to have this -- I think this panel needs to review in all the things we did to make sure it's written as concisely as possible. MS. JENKINS: Well, I'm happy to bring it back at consent and show you -- you know, I have a whole list of things that you have asked us to change. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Would you mind doing that? What I'd like you to do, though, is bring back the proposed language you need for a recommendation of approval for the ordinances. We have a list of the ordinances, but there's no numbers on them. So I'm not sure how you want them called out. So when we make a recommendation to the Board to approve Ordinance X whatever -- the ones I have don't have numbers on them. MS. JENKINS: When do we get the numbers, Heidi, for the ordinances? That's after it's adopted. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: How do we identify what we're recommending for approval then? MS. ASHTON-CICKO: The Clerk assigns it when it's approved by the Board. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. But then how do we recommend it at this point? Because there's nine of them. MS. JENKINS: So we can reference the Golden Gate -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Make them separate agenda items under -- just add them as an agenda item so we can look -- we can say we're recommending agenda item or something like that, because right now they're just in a large file; at least that's all I've got. MS. ASHTON-CICKO: Well, you can break them up by the CCME, the Golden Gate Area Master Plan, the urban, you know. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Whatever you guys want to do. If you could bring it back for final sendoff, we would appreciate that. And the only part I'm interested now in seeing is the wrap-up in the language in the city part of it. MS. JENKINS: So would it be most helpful, then, if we just accept all changes, you see a clean document, and then we're only redlining the changes of today, or do you want -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, I think the changes today -- just redline the changes today is all I'm -- MS. JENKINS: Okay. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Just redline today's changes. Then we'll scan through it real quick, catch them all. Then at that point we can recommend -- the ordinance will be coordinated to the redline changes, so we just assume it is, and we'll go from there. MR. WEEKS: Point being that we would provide -- the base document would be with no underline or strikethrough. The only underline and strikethrough would be to reflect your actions today? 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 56 Attachment: 7-18-2019 CCPC Minutes (9761 : July 18, 2019 CCPC minutes) July 18, 2019 Page 53 of 55 CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Correct. MR. WEEKS: Okay. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I would think that's all we need at this point. Okay. Good. Thank you. That will work. Anybody else have anything? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Then that one will go on the agenda at the end of whatever the next meeting you have it ready for, and we'll handle it. Okay. Hearing that, then let's -- go ahead. MS. JENKINS: Thinking about advertisement again and continuance and making sure our procedures are correct in what we need to do -- I mean, these are not substantive changes -- or not -- they're substantive, but they're not difficult to make these changes quickly for you. So, you know -- MS. ASHTON-CICKO: If they take a vote today, the vote today would -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: We're not voting today. The mic's not working. We're not -- MS. ASHTON-CICKO: Oh, you're not bringing it back on consent? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, consent -- oh, I see. We'll vote today subject to consent. Yeah, we could do that. Well, no, we can't. I'd like them to come back with something to vote on. We've got all the ordinances, but they're in a big file. We need them isolated on the agenda so we know what we're actually voting on. MS. JENKINS: And I don't mind if -- I mean, we can follow you if you say -- you know, you want to vote on the element today with the changes that were mentioned; we want to vote on the Golden Gate City sub-element today. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, with the exception of the city the changes -- well, we can see that on consent. I don't have a problem with that. Heidi, what do you need us to do to make it sufficient for you? MS. ASHTON-CICKO: Well, it's at your pleasure how you'd like to proceed. We can take the vote today and then you take a vote to ask that it come back on consent agenda so you can check to make sure that your changes were made, or you can continue the item to a date certain and then take your vote then; however, what you directed Anita to bring back is -- would not be the final ordinance version because you asked that the changes come back in strikethrough and underline to show only your changes today. I would suggest that maybe you do a final ordinance and ask staff to just highlight the sections that changed. Could you do that? MS. JENKINS: Sure. MS. ASHTON-CICKO: It would be easier to then just remove the highlighting when we print the final version for the Board. Does that work? MS. JENKINS: Yes. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Yeah. That works for me. MS. ASHTON-CICKO: Okay. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: So we'll -- we've got nine ordinances. We'll recommend them all for approval subject to the changes we did today and finalization of a review on consent. MS. JENKINS: Okay. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Do we have to read each ordinance separately, or can we just -- I could read them all together and ask for one motion to approve them all? There's nine of them. I have them all. MS. ASHTON-CICKO: Yeah, I think you can take one motion to approve them all. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Then if there's -- okay with you guys, I'll read off the nine motions (sic), and then we can make a motion. Go ahead, Ned. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Chairman, you mentioned the SIC codes in the urban section -- or excuse me -- the city section. 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 57 Attachment: 7-18-2019 CCPC Minutes (9761 : July 18, 2019 CCPC minutes) July 18, 2019 Page 54 of 55 CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Correct. COMMISSIONER FRYER: And I'm concerned also about where they appear in the rural section. And I understood from Mr. Bosi that that also is coming out? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Not now. It will be coming out eventually. What's happening is there's a land swap between that parcel and the Randall Curve. But the pieces that you're asking about have already been incorporated into a PUD. I looked at the PUD. So it's already there. I don't know how we can take it out now without interfering with someone's property rights on a parcel that's being swapped anyway. So maybe we don't need to mess with it. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Okay. Well, how will I have another bite at the apple with respect to the payday loans and the bail bondsmen? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: It's too late. It's already a PUD. COMMISSIONER FRYER: All right. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I mean, tell me. MS. ASHTON-CICKO: Yeah. It's already approved, and it was a private amendment, as staff had mentioned. So we don't like to take away rights -- COMMISSIONER FRYER: Okay. MS. ASHTON-CICKO: -- in amendments. We leave it as-is. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: After you had asked that, I checked. It's 7399 and the other one are both in there. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Okay. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: So that would mean we'd all have -- I can read all these nine off, if you all are comfortable, the remaining four of us. We can take one vote and be done and then come back on consent to make sure everything's done right. Is that okay? Okay. There's nine ordinances. The first one is the ordinance for the adoption of the CCME portion. The second one is the ordinance for the adoption of the Future Land Use Element portion, FLUE. The third one is the ordinance for the adoption of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan, the general master plan, the larger one. The fourth one is the ordinance for the adoption of the Golden Gate City portion of that plan. The fifth one is the ordinance for the adoption of a Golden Gate rural estates area of that plan. The one after that will be the adoption of the urban Golden Gate Estates area. And the next one will be the adoption of the solid waste portion of the plan. And the seventh one will be -- or the eighth one will be adoption of the stormwater section of the plan. And the last one will be the adoption of the transportation section of the plan. They don't have numbers on them because they haven't been approved yet, but those are the nine elements that we're talking about. Is there a motion to approve those as -- for recommendation as discussed and amended pursuant to staff's reading of the consent agenda? COMMISSIONER FRYER: I'll make that motion. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Is there a second? COMMISSIONER FRY: Second. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Motion made by Ned; seconded by the other Fry. With that, all in favor, signify by saying aye. COMMISSIONER FRY: Aye. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Aye. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Aye. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Aye. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Anybody opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Motion carries 4-0. That gets it over, Anita, so it's all yours to bring back. And we'll put it on the end of the next 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 58 Attachment: 7-18-2019 CCPC Minutes (9761 : July 18, 2019 CCPC minutes) July 18, 2019 Page 55 of 55 agenda up that you can get back with it. MS. JENKINS: Okay. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Thank you. And I guess that takes us to the end of our regularly scheduled business. We don't have any new business. Is there any old business? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I don't see any listed. Any public comment? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Hearing none, is there a motion to adjourn? COMMISSIONER FRYER: So moved. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: By Ned. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Second. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Seconded by Karen. All in favor, signify by saying aye. COMMISSIONER FRY: Aye. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Aye. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Aye. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Aye. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: We're out of here. Thank you all. ******* There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by order of the Chair at 12:28 p.m. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION _____________________________________ MARK STRAIN, CHAIRMAN ATTEST CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT & COMPTROLLER These minutes approved by the Board on ____________, as presented _______ or as corrected _______. TRANSCRIPT PREPARED ON BEHALF OF U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT, INC., BY TERRI LEWIS, COURT REPORTER AND NOTARY PUBLIC. 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 59 Attachment: 7-18-2019 CCPC Minutes (9761 : July 18, 2019 CCPC minutes) 08/15/2019 COLLIER COUNTY Collier County Planning Commission Item Number: 8.A Item Summary: PL20180000261/CPSP-18-2: 9 ordinance amendments of Ordinance 89-05, as amended, the Collier County Growth Management Plan of the unincorporated area of Collier County Florida, relating to the Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy. The following elements are changed or created with a separate ordinance for each: Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element and the Golden Gate Area Future Land Use Map and Map Series; Golden Gate Cit y Sub-Element of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element; Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element; Rural Estates Sub-Element of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element; Conservation and Coastal Management Element; Future Land Use Element And Future Land Use Map And Map Series; the Stormwater Management Sub-Element of the Public Facilities Element; the Solid Waste Sub-Element of the Public Facilities Element; and the Transportation Element. [Coordinator: Kris VanL engen, AICP, Project Manager] Meeting Date: 08/15/2019 Prepared by: Title: Planner, Senior – Zoning Name: Marcia R Kendall 08/07/2019 10:48 AM Submitted by: Title: Manager - Planning – Zoning Name: Ray Bellows 08/07/2019 10:48 AM Approved By: Review: Growth Management Operations & Regulatory Management Judy Puig Review item Completed 08/07/2019 11:04 AM Growth Management Department David Weeks Additional Reviewer Completed 08/07/2019 2:49 PM Growth Management Operations & Regulatory Management Donna Guitard Review Item Completed 08/07/2019 3:03 PM Growth Management Department James C French Review Item Completed 08/07/2019 3:10 PM Zoning Ray Bellows Review Item Completed 08/08/2019 9:07 AM Planning Commission Mark Strain Meeting Pending 08/15/2019 9:00 AM 8.A Packet Pg. 60 AGENDA ITEM 8A This item was heard at the July 18, 2019, CCPC meeting. You have received the full packet at the July 18, 2019 CCPC meeting. Attached are the changes requested. PL20180000261/CPSP-2018-2: 9 ordinance amendments of Ordinance 89-05, as amended, the Collier County Growth Management Plan of the unincorporated area of Collier County Florida, relating to the Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy. The following elements are changed or created with a separate ordinance for each: Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element and the Golden Gate Area Future Land Use Map and Map Series; Golden Gate City Sub-Element of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element; Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element; Rural Estates Sub-Element of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element; Conservation and Coastal Management Element; Future Land Use Element And Future Land Use Map And Map Series; the Stormwater Management Sub-Element of the Public Facilities Element; the Solid Waste Sub-Element of the Public Facilities Element; and the Transportation Element. [Coordinator: Anita Jenkins, Principal Planner] 8.A.1 Packet Pg. 61 Attachment: 8A-PL20180000261-CPSP-2018-2- Golden Gate Area Master Plan cover page (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy- Words underlined are added, and words struck through are deleted as CCPC recommended adoption changes. SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: ZONING DIVISION – COMMUNITY PLANNING SECTION DATE: JULY 19, 2019 SUBJECT: GMPA-PL20180000261, GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN AMENDMENT, CCPC ADOPTION RECOMMENDATIONS At the July 18, 2019 CCPC Adoption Hearing of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan Amendment, the CCPC approved a motion to adopt (4-0) with text and map changes. The applicable revised text and maps are summarized below under the titles: • Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element and revised maps; • Golden Gate City Master Plan Sub-Element and revised maps; • Urban Golden Gate Estates Master Plan Sub-Element and revised maps; and • Rural Golden Gate Estates Master Plan Sub-Element and revised maps. The full master plan documents attached (Exhibit A) show the clean text with highlights where the recommended changes were made. Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element I. INTRODUCTION As part of the revised Growth Management Plan, the County adopted the original Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) in 1991. The GGAMP was further revised in 1997. The Golden Gate Area Master Plan provides growth management regulations for the designated Golden Gate Area (see Original as shown on the Golden Gate Area Master Plan Study Areas Map). Map Series Changes Original Golden Gate Area Master Plan Study Areas – map revised to change the name and reflect the current study areas of Golden Gate City, Urban Golden Gate Estates and Rural Golden Gate Estates. GMPA-PL20180000261 Page 1 of 29 8.A.2 Packet Pg. 62 Attachment: Memo CCPC adoption recommendations (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261-CPSP-2018-2) GMPA-PL20180000261 Page 2 of 29 8.A.2 Packet Pg. 63 Attachment: Memo CCPC adoption recommendations (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261-CPSP-2018-2) IMMOKALEE RD INTERSTATE - 75 LAKETRAFFORD SR 29IMMOKALEE RD OIL WE LL RD COLLIER BLVDSR 82 LIVINGSTON RDTAMIAMI TRL NSR 29 NSAN MARCO RDDAVIS BLVDGOODLETTE RD NPINE RIDGE RD EVERGLADES BLVD NAIRPORT PULLING RD DESOTO BLVD SDESOTO BLVD N9TH ST NVANDERBILT DREVERGLADES BLVD SCORKSCREW RDGOLDEN GATE BLVD W COPELAND AVE SS 1ST STOLD US 41LAKE TRAFFORD RD WILSON BLVD NBONITA BEACH RD COLLIER AVE111 TH AVE N NE W MARKET RD W VANDERBILT BEACH RD 9TH ST SSEAGATE DR GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 0 2 4 61Miles³PREPARED BY: BETH YANG, AICPGROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENTFILE: Golden Gate Area Master Plan Areas.mxdDATE: 07/2019 STUDY AREA AMENDED - OCTOBER 14, 2008(Ord. No. 2008-59) AMENDED - OCTOBER 26, 2004(Ord. No. 2004-71) CITYOFNAPLES MARCOISLANDGUL F OF MEXI COLEGEND Golden Gate City Urban Golden Gate Estates Rural Golden Gate Estates GMPA-PL20180000261 Page 3 of 29 8.A.2 Packet Pg. 64 Attachment: Memo CCPC adoption recommendations (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261-CPSP-2018-2) Words underlined are added, and words struck through are deleted as CCPC recommended adoption changes. Golden Gate City Master Plan Sub-Element Policy 2.1.5 Collier County shall discourage new land uses along Golden Gate Parkway and within the Activity Center that impede pedestrian activity and are solely auto-oriented, such as car washes, storage facilities, auto dealerships and drive throughs. Land development regulations will be established initiated within two years to ensure compatibility of auto-oriented uses within the pedestrian environment. 1. URBAN DESIGNATION: URBAN MIXED-USE DISTRICT AND URBAN COMMERCIAL DISTRICT d. community facilities such as neighborhood churches, cemeteries, schools, and school facilities co-located with other public facilities such as parks, libraries, and community centers, where feasible and mutually acceptable, fire and police stations; f. support medical facilities such as physician's offices, medical clinics, treatment, research and rehabilitative centers and pharmacies (as long as the dominant use is medical related) may also be permitted provided they are granted concurrent with or located within ¼ mile of existing or approved hospitals or medical centers which offer primary and urgent care treatment for all types of injuries and traumas, such as, Golden Gate Urgent Care. Stipulations to ensure that the construction of such support medical facilities is concurrent with hospitals or such medical centers shall be determined at the time of zoning approval. B. Urban Commercial District 1. Mixed Use Activity Center Subdistrict Certain uses specifically intended to support economic development in Golden Gate City are allowed within the Mixed Use Activity Center. The following uses as identified with a number from the Standard Industrial Classification Manual are allowed as will be provided for in the Golden Gate Parkway Overlay District. The Overlay District will include standards to address compatibility and building scale. a. Advanced manufacturing, including automated apparel (2211-2299, and 2311 - 2399), light assembly (3679) and 3D printing (3571, 3629); b. Call centers (7338); c. Software development and programming (7371); d. Internet technologies and electronic commerce (7374); e. Data and information processing (7374); f. Professional services that are export based such as laboratory research or testing activities (8734); g. Other uses as may be determined by the Board of County Commissioners consistent with the intent of supporting economic development in Golden Gate City. GMPA-PL20180000261 Page 4 of 29 8.A.2 Packet Pg. 65 Attachment: Memo CCPC adoption recommendations (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261-CPSP-2018-2) Words underlined are added, and words struck through are deleted as CCPC recommended adoption changes. 2. Golden Gate City Urban Commercial In-fill Subdistrict This Subdistrict is located at the southwest quadrant of C.R. 951 and Golden Gate Parkway. Due to the existing zoning and land use pattern in proximity to the Commercial In -fill Subdistrict (see Golden Gate City Urban Commercial Infill Subdistrict and Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict Map) and the need to ensure adequate development standards to buffer adjacent land uses, commercial uses shall be permitted under the following criteria: 3. Santa Barbara Commercial Subdistrict The boundaries of the Subdistrict are hereby expanded to include the former Commercial Subdistrict and also to extend approximately one (1) block to the east of the former boundary (see Santa Barbara Commercial Subdistrict Map). The intent of the Santa Barbara Commercial Subdistrict is to provide Golden Gate City with an area that is primarily commercial, with an allowance for certain conditional uses. The types of uses permitted within this Subdistrict are low intensity retail, offices, personal services, and institutional uses, such as neighborhood churches and day care centers. Such development is intended to serve the needs of residents within the Subdistrict and surrounding neighborhoods and persons traveling nearby. 4. Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict Within one year of the effective date of this Subdistrict, The Land Development Code shall be amended to establish a zoning overlay containing regulations to implement this Subdistrict. Map Series Changes Golden Gate City Future Land Use Map – map revised for consistency so all land use district boundaries are abutting regardless of rights-of-way. Golden Gate City Urban Commercial Infill Subdistrict and Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict – new map to revise name and remove Urban Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict locations outside the boundaries of Golden Gate City. Downtown Center Commercial Subdistrict – map revised for consistency so all land use district boundaries are abutting regardless of rights-of-way. Urban Mixed Use Activity Center – map revised to remove hatching within the existing activity center boundary. GMPA-PL20180000261 Page 5 of 29 8.A.2 Packet Pg. 66 Attachment: Memo CCPC adoption recommendations (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261-CPSP-2018-2) INTERSTATE 75COLLIER BLVDDowntown Center Commercial Subdis trict Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Mixed Use Activity Center Subdistrict Downtown Center Commercial Subdis trict Santa Barbara Commercial Subdis tr ict Golden G ate Urban Commerc ial Infill Subdistrict GOLDEN GATE PKY SANTA BARBARA BLVDGREEN BLVD PROPOSED GOLDE N GATE CITY FUTURE LAND USE MAP AdditionAddition Addition Legend Category Golden Gate Urban Commercial Infill Subdistrict Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Downtown Center Commercial Subdistrict Santa Barbara Commercial Subdistrict Urban Residential Subdistrict Mixed Use Activity Center Subdistrict Addition ¯ GMPA-PL20180000261 Page 6 of 29 8.A.2 Packet Pg. 67 Attachment: Memo CCPC adoption recommendations (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy- INTERSTATE 75COLLIER BLVDDowntown Center Commercial Subdis trict Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Mixed Use Activity Center Subdistrict Downtown Center Commercial Subdis trict Santa Barbara Commercial Subdis tr ict Golden G ate Urban Commerc ial Infill Subdistrict GOLDEN GATE PKY SANTA BARBARA BLVDGREEN BLVD PROPOSED GOLDE N GATE CITY FUTURE LAND USE MAP AdditionAddition Addition Legend Category Golden Gate Urban Commercial Infill Subdistrict Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Downtown Center Commercial Subdistrict Santa Barbara Commercial Subdistrict Urban Residential Subdistrict Mixed Use Activity Center Subdistrict Addition ¯ THIS MAP CAN NOT B E INTERPRET ED WITHOUT THE GOALS, OBJECTIV ES, POLICIE S AND LAND USE DESIGNAT ION DESCRIPT ION SECTION OF THE GOL DEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN. NOTE: 0 1,000 2,000 3,000500Feet PREPARED BY: BETH YANG, AICPGROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENTFILE: Pro posed Golden Gate City FLU.mxdDATE: 07/201 9 ADOPTED - XXXXX, 2019(Ord. No. XXXX-XX) GOLDEN GATE CITY FUTURE LAND USE MAPT49S R 26 EGMPA-PL20180000261 Page 7 of 29 8.A.2 Packet Pg. 68 Attachment: Memo CCPC adoption recommendations (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy- GMPA-PL20180000261 Page 8 of 29 8.A.2 Packet Pg. 69 Attachment: Memo CCPC adoption recommendations (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy- Collier BLVDGolden Gate PKWY 39th ST SW32 nd AV E S W 44th ST SW55th TER SWTropical WAYSanta Barbara BLVD55th ST SWCoronado PKWY 47th ST SW24th AVE SW Tropicana BLVD47th TER SW31 st PL SWHunter BLVD50th ST SW50th TER SW48th TER SW45th ST SW27th C T S W 52nd ST SW51st ST SW43rd LN SWMystic ALY 53rd ST SW29 t h P L S WSunshine BLVD51st TER SW22nd PL SW 3 0 t h A V E S W Toucan ALY 24th PL SW 41st TER SW48th ST SW41st ST SW30 t h P L S W 25th CT SW 43rd ST SW54th LN SW2 8 t h A V E S W 53rd T E R S W 27th PL SW44th TER SW46th TER SW25 th AVE SW 26 th AVE SW 23rd PL SW 52nd TER SW46th ST SW28th PL SW23rd CT SW 21st AVE SW 23rd AVE SW 27 th AVE SW 49th LN SW31st AVE SW 29 th AVE SW45th TER SW21st PL SW 2 5 t h P L S W 26th PL SWStar Grass LN Sea Grass LN City Gate BLVD NRecreation LN Noahs WAY54th ST SWCopper Leaf LN 52nd LN SW49th ST SWPainted Leaf LN 22nd AVE SW 42nd ST SW54th TER SW42nd TER SWSafe Harbor DR C o r a l P a l m s L N Lucerne RD28th CT SW 2 0 th P L S W 43rd TER SWSunnyland LN German Woods CT 49th TER SW50th LN SW20th CT SW Y o s e m i t e C T 4 5 t h S T S W52nd TER SW44th ST SW2 8 t h P L S W 25 th AVE SW 30 t h P L S W 2 8 t h A V E S W 51st S T S W Toucan ALY23rd CT SW 26th PL SW4 7 t h S T S W23rd PL SW 31 st PL SW 45th ST SW28th AVE SW23rd AVE SW 28th PL SW27th PL SW54th ST S W 29 t h P L S W 42nd TER SW31 st PL SW 25 th C T S W 21st AVE SW 2 6 t h A V E S W53rd ST SW27th AVE SW41st ST SW5 3r d S T S W 21st AVE SW 32 nd AV E S W 31 st AVE S W50th ST SW28th A V E S W54th TER SW26th PL SW 23rd AVE SW23rd AVE SW 50th ST SW42nd ST SW25th AVE SW 29 th A V E S W 3 2 n d A V E S W 52nd LN SW31 st PL SW28th AVE SW42nd ST SW22nd PL SW 30 th AVE SW 22nd AVE SW 43rd ST SW44t h TER SW55th TER SW22nd PL SW 50th ST SW21st PL SW55th ST SW44th TER SW27 th C T S W 30 th AV E S W43rd ST SW52nd TE R S W 25th PL SW46th ST SW41st TER SW2 8 t h A V E S W 31st AVE SW50th TER SW21 st PL SW Collier BLVDGolden Gate PKWYSanta Barbara BLVDº0 1,000 2,000500 FeetPREPARED BY: BETH YANG, AICPGROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENTFILE: Golden Gate Urban Commercial Infill Subdistrict.mxdDATE: 08/2019 GOLDEN GATE CITY URBAN COMMERCIAL INFILL SUBDISTRICTCOLLIER COUNTY, FLO RI DA LEGEND GOLDEN GATE CITYURBAN COMMERCIALINFILL SUBDISTRICT AMENDED - JANUARY 25, 2007(Ord. No. 2007-19)AMENDED - OCTOBER 14, 2008(Ord. No. 2008-59) AMENDED - SEPTEMBER 10, 2003(Ord. No. 2003-44) GMPA-PL20180000261 Page 9 of 29 8.A.2 Packet Pg. 70 Attachment: Memo CCPC adoption recommendations (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy- Golden Gate PKWY Collier BLVD44th ST SW23rd AVE SW 55th TER SWTropical WAYSanta Barbara BLVDCoronado PKWY 47th ST SW24th AVE SW Tropicana BLVD55th ST SW47th TER SW31 st PL SW46th ST SW50th ST SW48th TER SW31 st AVE S W 27th C T S W 25 th AVE SW Mystic ALY 52nd ST SW29 t h P L S WHunter BLVD50th TER SW22nd PL SW 30th AVE SWToucan ALY 24th PL SW 53rd ST SW45th ST SW43rd LN SW44th TER SW41st ST SW30 t h P L S W 25th CT SW51st ST SW43rd ST SW28th AVE SWSunshine BLVD53rd T E R S W 27th PL SW26 th AVE SW 51st TER SW23rd PL SW 52nd TER SW28th PL SW23rd CT SW 49th LN SW54th LN SW41st TER SW27th AVE SW25 t h P L S W 26th PL SW48th ST SW54th ST SW49th ST SW46th TER SW22nd AVE SW 42nd ST SW52nd LN SW54th TER SW42nd TER SW2 9 th A V E S W 32 nd AV E S W C o r a l P a l m s L N Lucerne RD28th CT SW 45th TER SW49th TER SW50th LN SW22nd AVE SW 25th PL SW50th ST SW31 st PL SW Toucan ALY2 8 t h A V E S W 31 st AVE S W 45th ST SW2 6 t h A V E S W 28th AVE SW55th TER SW29 t h P L S W 2 8 th P L S W 2 8 t h A V E S W 52nd TE R S W 25th AVE SW 23rd AVE SW 22nd PL SW 27th PL SW22nd AVE SW 23rd PL SW 26th PL SW54th TER SW54th ST S W 22nd PL SW 42nd TER SW27 th C T S W 26th PL SW 42nd ST SW31 st PL SW 41st ST SW46th ST SW22nd AVE SW 43rd ST SW30 t h P L S W 42nd ST SW53rd ST SW44th TER SW5 3r d S T S W 44th ST SW4 7 t h S T S W31 st PL SW 28th PL SW55th ST SW22nd PL SW 23rd AVE SW 41st TER SW44th TER SW25 th C T S W 30 th AVE SW 2 8 t h A V E S W 50th TER SW22nd PL SW 28th AVE SW30 th AV E S W 4 5 t h S T S W52nd TER SW50th ST SW23rd CT SW 22nd AVE SW Golden Gate PKWYCollier BLVDSanta Barbara BLVDº0 1,000 2,000500 FeetPREPARED BY: GIS/CAD MAPPING SECTIONGROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENTFILE: RLS-18-CMP-01009.mxdDATE: 05/2018 SUBJECTSITE DOWNTOWN CENTER COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICTCOLLIER COUNTY, FLO RI DA LEGEND DOWNTOWN CENTERCOMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT D R A F T ADOPTED - OCTOBER 26, 2004(Ord. No. 2004-71)AMENDED - JANUARY 25, 2007(Ord. No. 2007-19)AMENDED - OCTOBER 14, 2008(Ord. No. 2008-59) ADDITION ADDITION ADDITION GMPA-PL20180000261 Page 10 of 29 8.A.2 Packet Pg. 71 Attachment: Memo CCPC adoption recommendations (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy- Golden Gate PKWY Collier BLVD44th ST SW23rd AVE SW 55th TER SWTropical WAYSanta Barbara BLVDCoronado PKWY 47th ST SW24th AVE SW Tropicana BLVD55th ST SW47th TER SW31 st PL SW46th ST SW50th ST SW48th TER SW31 st AVE S W 27th C T S W 25 th AVE SW Mystic ALY 52nd ST SW29 t h P L S WHunter BLVD50th TER SW22nd PL SW 30th AVE SWToucan ALY 24th PL SW 53rd ST SW45th ST SW43rd LN SW44th TER SW41st ST SW30 t h P L S W 25th CT SW51st ST SW43rd ST SW28th AVE SWSunshine BLVD53rd T E R S W 27th PL SW26 th AVE SW 51st TER SW23rd PL SW 52nd TER SW28th PL SW23rd CT SW 49th LN SW54th LN SW41st TER SW27th AVE SW25 t h P L S W 26th PL SW48th ST SW54th ST SW49th ST SW46th TER SW22nd AVE SW 42nd ST SW52nd LN SW54th TER SW42nd TER SW2 9 th A V E S W 32 nd AV E S W C o r a l P a l m s L N Lucerne RD28th CT SW 45th TER SW49th TER SW50th LN SW22nd AVE SW 25th PL SW50th ST SW31 st PL SW Toucan ALY2 8 t h A V E S W 31 st AVE S W 45th ST SW2 6 t h A V E S W 28th AVE SW55th TER SW29 t h P L S W 2 8 th P L S W 2 8 t h A V E S W 52nd TE R S W 25th AVE SW 23rd AVE SW 22nd PL SW 27th PL SW22nd AVE SW 23rd PL SW 26th PL SW54th TER SW54th ST S W 22nd PL SW 42nd TER SW27 th C T S W 26th PL SW 42nd ST SW31 st PL SW 41st ST SW46th ST SW22nd AVE SW 43rd ST SW30 t h P L S W 42nd ST SW53rd ST SW44th TER SW5 3r d S T S W 44th ST SW4 7 t h S T S W31 st PL SW 28th PL SW55th ST SW22nd PL SW 23rd AVE SW 41st TER SW44th TER SW25 th C T S W 30 th AVE SW 2 8 t h A V E S W 50th TER SW22nd PL SW 28th AVE SW30 th AV E S W 4 5 t h S T S W52nd TER SW50th ST SW23rd CT SW 22nd AVE SW Golden Gate PKWYCollier BLVDSanta Barbara BLVDº0 1,000 2,000500 FeetPREPARED BY: GIS/CAD M APPING SECTIONGROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENTFILE: DOW NTHO WN CENTER COM MERCIAL SUBDISTRICT.mxdDATE: 07/2019 SUBJECTSITE DOWNTOWN CENTER COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICTCOLLIER COUNTY, FLO RI DA EXHIBIT A PL20180000261/CP SP-2018-2 LEGEND DOWNTOWN CENTERCOMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT D R A F T ADOPTED - OCTOBER 26, 2004(Ord. No. 2004-71)AMENDED - JANUARY 25, 2007(Ord. No. 2007-19)AMENDED - OCTOBER 14, 2008(Ord. No. 2008-59) ADDITION ADDITION ADDITION GMPA-PL20180000261 Page 11 of 29 8.A.2 Packet Pg. 72 Attachment: Memo CCPC adoption recommendations (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy- Golden Gate PKWY55th TER SW55th ST SW44th ST SW23rd AVE SW Hunter BLVD50th TER SWSunset RD Coronado PKWY 47th ST SW24th AVE SW Tropicana BLVD48th ST SWSunshine BLVD45th ST SW47th TER SW51st ST SW31 st PL SW48th TER SW46th TER SW31 st AVE S W 25 th AVE SW 43rd LN SW51st TER SW52nd ST SW46th ST SW45th TER SW30th AVE SWToucan ALY 24th PL SW 53rd ST SW44th TER SW19 th PL SW 50th S T S W 27th C T S W 30 t h P L S W 25th CT SW 28th AVE SW53rd T E R S W 27th PL SWMystic ALY 19th AVE SW 29 t h P L S W 19th CT SW23rd PL SW 52nd TER SW49th ST SW28th PL SW23rd CT SW 49th LN SW54th LN SW26 th AV E S W 4 9th T E R S W27th AVE SW21 st PL SW 25 t h P L S W 26th PL SW22nd PL SW 20th PL SW 54th ST SW52nd LN SW18th PL SW22nd AVE SW 54th TER SW2 9 th A V E S W 21st AVE SW C o r a l P a l m s L N Lucerne RD28th CT SW 18th AVE SW50th LN SW20th AVE SW 43rd TER SW20th CT SW52nd TE R S W 50th ST SW31 st PL SW 52nd TER SW50th ST SW27th PL SW26th PL SW23rd AVE SW 22nd PL SW 25th AVE SW 52nd ST SW44th TER SW2 8 t h A V E S W 4 7 t h S T S W2 8 th P L S W28th AVE SW2 6 t h A V E S W 28th PL SW19th PL SW 49th TER SW19th PL SW 21 st PL SW 45th ST SW49th ST SW51st ST SW21st PL SW22nd PL SW 4 5 t h S T S W30 t h P L S W 21st AVE SW 54th TER SW28th AVE SW21st AVE SW 23rd CT SW 22nd PL SW 22nd AVE SW 19th AVE SW 27 th CT S W 51st TER SW5 3r d S T S W22nd AVE SW 54th S T S W 30 th AVE SW 55th TER SW55th ST SW46th ST SW44th ST SW53rd ST SW50th TER SW2 8 t h A V E S W 2 8 t h A V E S W 20th PL SW 31 st PL SW 31 st AVE S W 44th TER SW50th ST SW19th CT SW 19th A VE SW 26th PL SWToucan ALY23rd PL SW19 th PL SW25 th C T S W 25th PL SWGolden Gate PKWYURBAN MIXED USE ACTIVITY CENTERGOLDEN GATE PARKWAY AND CORONADO PARKWAY COLLIER COUN TY, FLORIDA º0 1,000 2,000500 FeetPREPARED BY: GIS/CAD MAPPING SECTIONGROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENTFILE: RLS-18-CMP-01009 ACTIVITY CENTER MAP.mxdDATE: 04/2018 SUBJECTSITE LEGEND ACTIVITY CENTERBOUNDARIES AMENDED - JANUARY 25, 2007(O rd. No. 2007-1 9) AMENDED - OCTOBER 14, 2008(O rd. No. 2008-5 9) AMENDED - JANUARY 25, 2005(O rd. No. 2005-3 ) ADDITION ADDITION GMPA-PL20180000261 Page 12 of 29 8.A.2 Packet Pg. 73 Attachment: Memo CCPC adoption recommendations (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261-CPSP-2018-2) Golden Gate PKWY55th TER SW55th ST SW44th ST SW23rd AVE SW Hunter BLVD50th TER SWSunset RD Coronado PKWY 47th ST SW24th AVE SW Tropicana BLVD48th ST SWSunshine BLVD45th ST SW47th TER SW51st ST SW31 st PL SW48th TER SW46th TER SW31 st AVE S W 25 th AVE SW 43rd LN SW51st TER SW52nd ST SW46th ST SW45th TER SW30th AVE SWToucan ALY 24th PL SW 53rd ST SW44th TER SW19 th PL SW 50th S T S W 27th C T S W 30 t h P L S W 25th CT SW 28th AVE SW53rd T E R S W 27th PL SWMystic ALY 19th AVE SW 29 t h P L S W 19th CT SW23rd PL SW 52nd TER SW49th ST SW28th PL SW23rd CT SW 49th LN SW54th LN SW26 th AV E S W 4 9th T E R S W27th AVE SW21 st PL SW 25 t h P L S W 26th PL SW22nd PL SW 20th PL SW 54th ST SW52nd LN SW18th PL SW22nd AVE SW 54th TER SW2 9 th A V E S W 21st AVE SW C o r a l P a l m s L N Lucerne RD28th CT SW 18th AVE SW50th LN SW20th AVE SW 43rd TER SW20th CT SW52nd TE R S W 50th ST SW31 st PL SW 52nd TER SW50th ST SW27th PL SW26th PL SW23rd AVE SW 22nd PL SW 25th AVE SW 52nd ST SW44th TER SW2 8 t h A V E S W 4 7 t h S T S W2 8 th P L S W28th AVE SW2 6 t h A V E S W 28th PL SW19th PL SW 49th TER SW19th PL SW 21 st PL SW 45th ST SW49th ST SW51st ST SW21st PL SW22nd PL SW 4 5 t h S T S W30 t h P L S W 21st AVE SW 54th TER SW28th AVE SW21st AVE SW 23rd CT SW 22nd PL SW 22nd AVE SW 19th AVE SW 27 th CT S W 51st TER SW5 3r d S T S W22nd AVE SW 54th S T S W 30 th AVE SW 55th TER SW55th ST SW46th ST SW44th ST SW53rd ST SW50th TER SW2 8 t h A V E S W 2 8 t h A V E S W 20th PL SW 31 st PL SW 31 st AVE S W 44th TER SW50th ST SW19th CT SW 19th A VE SW 26th PL SWToucan ALY23rd PL SW19 th PL SW25 th C T S W 25th PL SWGolden Gate PKWYEXHIBIT A PL201800 00261/CPSP-2018-2 URBAN MIXED USE ACTIVITY CENTERGOLDEN GATE PARKWAY AND CORONADO PARKWAY COLLIER COUN TY, FLORIDA º0 1,000 2,000500 FeetPREPARED BY: GIS/CAD MAPPING SECTIONGROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENTFILE: RLS-18-CMP-01009 ACTIVITY CENTER MAP.mxdDATE: 07/2019 SUBJECTSITE LEGEND ACTIVITY CENTERBOUNDARIES AMENDED - JANUARY 25, 2007(O rd. No. 2007-1 9) AMENDED - OCTOBER 14, 2008(O rd. No. 2008-5 9) AMENDED - JANUARY 25, 2005(O rd. No. 2005-3 ) ADDITION ADDITION GMPA-PL20180000261 Page 13 of 29 8.A.2 Packet Pg. 74 Attachment: Memo CCPC adoption recommendations (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261-CPSP-2018-2) Words underlined are added, and words struck through are deleted as CCPC recommended adoption changes. Urban Golden Gate Estates Master Plan Sub-Element OBJECTIVE 1.1: Develop new or revised uses of land consistent with designations outlined on the Urban Golden Gate Estates Future Land Use Map and provisions found in the Land Use Designation Description Section of this Sub Element. b. Locations Neighborhood Centers are located along major roadways and are distributed within Golden Gate Estates according to commercial demand estimates. (See Urban Golden Gate Estates Neighborhood Centers Map). The centers are designed to concentrate all new commercial zoning, and conditional uses, as allowed in the Estates Zoning District, in locations where traffic impacts can be readily accommodated and to avoid strip and disorganized patterns of commercial and conditional use development. Policy 1.1.6: To obtain Conditional Use approval, a super majority vote (minimum of 4 votes) by the Board of Zoning Appeals shall be required. Policy 1.1.6 1.1.7: No development orders shall be issued inconsistent with the Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub- Element with the exception of those unimproved properties granted a positive determination through the Zoning Re-evaluation Program and identified on the Future Land Use Map Series as properties consistent by Policy and those development orders issued pursuant to conditional uses and rezones approved based on the County-Wi de Future Land Use Element (adopted January 10, 1989, Ordinance 89-05) which was in effect at the time of approval. Any subsequent development orders shall also be reviewed for consistency with the Growth Management Plan based on the County-Wide Future Land Use Element. Policy 1.1.7: 1.1.8 The sites containing existing public educational plants and ancillary plants, and the undeveloped sites owned by the Collier County School Board for future public educational plants and ancillary plants, within the GGAMP area Urban Golden Gate Estates area, are depicted on the Future Land Use Map Series in the countywide FLUE and on the Public School Facilities Element Map Series, and referenced in FLUE Policy 5.14 and Intergovernmental Coordination Element Policy 1.2.6. B. Estates Commercial District 4. Urban Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict This Subdistrict consists of two infill areas. The two areas are located at the northwest corner of Collier Boulevard and Green Boulevard and at the northwest corner of Santa Barbara Boulevard and Golden Gate Parkway. Due to the existing zoning and land use pattern in GMPA-PL20180000261 Page 14 of 29 8.A.2 Packet Pg. 75 Attachment: Memo CCPC adoption recommendations (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261-CPSP-2018-2) Words underlined are added, and words struck through are deleted as CCPC recommended adoption changes. proximity to the Estates Commercial In-fill Subdistrict (see Golden Gate Urban Commercial Infill Subdistrict and Urban Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict Map) and the need to ensure adequate development standards to buffer adjacent land uses, commercial uses shall be permitted under the following criteria: Map Series Changes Urban Golden Gate Area Estates Future Land Use Map – new map to revise name and show future land uses only within the boundary of the Urban Golden Gate Estates. Golden Gate Urban Commercial Infill Subdistrict and Urban Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict - new map to revise name and remove Golden Gate City Commercial Infill Subdistrict location outside the boundaries of the Urban Golden Gate Estates. Urban Golden Gate Estates Neighborhood Center - new map to revise name and remove Rural Golden Gate Estates Neighborhood Centers locations outside the boundaries of the Urban Golden Gate Estates. GMPA-PL20180000261 Page 15 of 29 8.A.2 Packet Pg. 76 Attachment: Memo CCPC adoption recommendations (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261-CPSP-2018-2) COLLIER BLVDCOLLIER BLVDTA MIA MIT R L E INTERSTATE 75 INTERSTATE 75I-75I-75RANDALL BLVD C.R. 951IMMOKALEE RD C.R. 951S.R. 84 EVERGLADES BLVD SDESOTO BLVD SIMMOKALEE RD OIL WEL L RD COLLIER BLVDLIVINGSTON RDDAVIS BLVD PIN E R I D GE R D EVERGLADES BLVD NRADIO RD G.G . P KW Y DESOTO BLVD SLOGAN BLVD NSANTA BARBARA BLVDDESOTO BLVD NVANDERBILT BEACH RD GOLDE N GATE BLV D EVERGLADES BLVD SGO LDE N GATE BLV D GREEN BLVD RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK RD WILSON BLVD COUNTY BARN RDURBAN DESIGNATION THIS MAP CAN NOT BE INTERPRETED WITHOUT THE GOALS, OBJECTIVES, POLICIES AND LAND USE DESIGNATION DESCRIPTION SECTION OF THE GOLDENGATE AREA MASTER PLAN. NOTE : MIXED USE DISTRICT Urban Residential Subdist rict Downtown Cen ter Com mercial Su bdistrict ESTAT ES DESIGNATION MIXED USE DISTRICT Residentia l Estates Subdist rict Conditional Uses Subdistrict T51ST50ST49ST48ST47SR 26 E R 27 E R 28 E R 29 E GOLDEN GATEFUTURE LAND USE MAP A M E N D E D - J A N U A R Y 2 5 , 2 0 0 5(O R D . N O . 2 0 0 5 -3 ) A M E N D E D - D E C E M B E R 4 , 2 0 0 7(O R D . N O . 2 0 0 7 -7 7 )A M E N D E D - O C T O B E R 1 4 , 2 0 0 8(O R D . N O . 2 0 0 8 -5 9 )A M E N D E D - J U LY 2 8 , 2 0 1 0(O R D . N O . 2 0 1 0 -3 1 )A M E N D E D - J U LY 2 8 , 2 0 1 0(O R D . N O . 2 0 1 0 -3 2 ) A M E N D E D - N O V E M B E R 1 8 , 2 0 1 4(O R D . N O . 2 0 1 4 -4 1 ) A M E N D E D - S E P T E M B E R 1 4 , 2 0 11(O R D . N O . 2 0 11 -2 9 ) A M E N D E D - N O V E M B E R 1 0 , 2 0 1 5(O R D . N O . 2 0 1 5 -6 2 ) A D O P T E D -F E B R A R Y, 1 9 9 1 A M E N D E D - M AY 1 9 , 1 9 9 2 A M E N D E D - M AY 2 5 , 1 9 9 3 A M E N D E D - J U LY 2 7 , 1 9 9 3 A M E N D E D - A P R I L 1 2 , 1 9 9 4 A M E N D E D - M A R C H 1 4 , 1 9 9 5 A M E N D E D - O C T O B E R 2 7 , 1 9 9 7 A M E N D E D - A P R I L 1 4 , 1 9 9 8 A M E N D E D - S E P T E M B E R 8 , 1 9 9 8 A M E N D E D - F E B R U A R Y 2 3 , 1 9 9 9 A M E N D E D - M AY 9 , 2 0 0 0 A M E N D E D - M A R C H 1 3 , 2 0 0 1 A M E N D E D - M AY 1 4 , 2 0 0 2 A M E N D E D - S E P T E M B E R 1 0 , 2 0 0 3(O R D . N O . 2 0 0 3 -4 4 )A M E N D E D - O C T O B E R 2 6 , 2 0 0 4(O R D . N O . 2 0 0 4 -7 1 ) A M E N D E D - J A N U A R Y 2 5 , 2 0 0 7(O R D . N O . 2 0 0 7 -1 9 ) A M E N D E D - J U N E 1 3 ,2 0 1 7(O R D . N O . 2 0 1 7 -2 3 ) GOLDEN GATE AREAFUTURE LAND USE MAP 0 1 2 30.5 Miles PREPARED BY: G IS/MAPPING SECTIO NGROWTH MANAG EMENT DEPT.DATE: 0 5/201 8FILE: PL201 80000261 -CPSP-2 018-2 G GFL U DRAFT.MXD ° SUBJECT SITE (ADDIT IONS)CPSP-2018-2 D R A F T A M E N D E D - X X X X X(O R D . N O . X X X X ) A M E N D E D - M AY 1 0 , 2 0 1 6(O R D . N O . 2 0 1 6 -1 2 ) High Density Residential Subdistrict Mixed Use Activit y Ce nter Subdistrict Golde n Gate Urban Commercial Infill Sub district San ta Barbara Co mmercia l Subdistrict COMMERCIAL DISTRICT Conditional Use Subdist rict:Golde n Gate Parkway Spe cial Provisio ns Neig hborhood Center Subd istrict Golde n Gate ParkwayInstitional Subd istrict Mission Subdistrict Everglades-Randa ll Subdistrict Special Exceptions to Conditional Use Locational Criteria AGRICULTURAL / RURAL DESIGNATION Sou thern Golden Ga te Estates Natu ra lResource Protection Area O verlay OVERLAYS AND SPECIAL FEATURES Rural Sett lement Area District Residentia l De nsity Ba nds Interchang e Activity Center Subd istrict(As Described in the Future Land Use Element in the GM P) Comme rcial Western Estate s Infill Subdistrict Pine Ridge Road Mixed Use Subdistrict Randa ll Boule vard Commercial Subdistrict Estates Shop ping Center Subdistrict Sou thbrooke Office Subdistrict Golde n Gate Estates CommercialInfill Sub district COMMERCIAL DISTRICTCollier Boulevard Co mmercia l Subdistrict GMPA-PL20180000261 Page 16 of 29 8.A.2 Packet Pg. 77 Attachment: Memo CCPC adoption recommendations (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261-CPSP-2018-2) C.R. 951COLLIER BLVDI-75I-75I N T E R S TAT E -7 5 IMMOKALEE RD IMMOKALEE RD LIVINGSTON RDTAMIAMI TRL NDAVIS BLVDGOODLETTE RD NP I N E R I D G E R D R A D I O R D G .G . P K W Y LOGAN BLVD NSANTA BARBARA BLVDVANDERBILT BEACH RD AIRPORT PULLING RD NGO LD E N GATE BLVD 9TH ST NGR EEN BLVDOLD US 41RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK RDCOUNTY BARN RDAIRPORT PULLING RD SW I G G I N S PA S S R D 9TH ST ST51ST50ST49ST48ST47SR 26 E R 27 E R 28 E R 29 E URBAN GOLDEN GATE ESTATESFUTURE LAND USE MAP 0 1 2 30.5 Miles PREPARED BY: BETH YANG, AICPGROWTH MANAG EMENT DEPT.DATE: 2 /2019FILE: URBAN G OLDEN GATE ESTATES FLU.MXD ° COMMERCIAL DISTRICT Interchang e Activity Center Subd istrict(As Described in the Future Land Use Element in the GM P) Pine Ridge Road Mixed Use Subdistrict Comme rcial Western Estate s Infill Subdistrict Golde n Gate Estates CommercialInfill Sub district Sou thbrooke Office Subdistrict ESTAT ES DESIGNATION MIXED USE DISTRICT Residentia l Estates Subdist rict Neig hborhood Center Subd istrict Golde n Gate ParkwayInstitional Subd istrict Conditional Uses Subdistrict Conditional Use Subdist rict:Golde n Gate Parkway Spe cial Provisio ns THIS MAP CAN NOT BE INTERPRETED WITHOUT THE GOALS, OBJECTIVES, POLICIES AND LAND USE DESIGNATION DESCRIPTION SECTION OF THE GOLDENGATE AREA MASTER PLAN. NOTE : URBAN GOLDEN GATEFUTURE LAND USE MAP A D O P T E D - X X X X , 2 0 1 9 GMPA-PL20180000261 Page 17 of 29 8.A.2 Packet Pg. 78 Attachment: Memo CCPC adoption recommendations (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261-CPSP-2018-2) GMPA-PL20180000261 Page 18 of 29 8.A.2 Packet Pg. 79 Attachment: Memo CCPC adoption recommendations (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy- Golden Gate PKWY CollierBLVDGreen BLVD Green BLVDGreen BLVD 39th ST SWCollier BLVDGolden Gate PKWY55th ST SWSanta Barbara BLVD55th TER SWTropical WAY15 th AVE SW Sunshine BLVDSalt ALY44th ST SW48th ST SWWestport LN Hunter BLVDSunset RD Sea Grass LN Star Grass LN Coronado PKWY 50th TER SWCedar Tree LN 24th AVE SW Copper Leaf LN 16th PL SW Painted Leaf LN 45th ST SW17 th AVE SW 25 th AVE SW40th TER SW47th TER SW47th ST SW21st AVE SW 19 th AVE SW 27 th AVE SW 23rd AVE SW 29 th AVE SW41st ST SW18th PL SW 46th TER SW49th ST SWTropicana B LV D 48th TER SW27th C T S W43rd LN SW51st TER SWMystic ALY Atoll CT 29 t h P L S W46th ST SW41st TER SW22nd PL SW45th TER SW18th CT SW 52nd TER SW51st ST SWToucan ALY24th PL SW44th TER SW19 th PL SW 50t h ST SW25th CT SW52nd ST SW28th AVE SW1 8 th A V E S W 53rd T E R S W 27th PL SW26th AVE SW 17th CT SW19th CT SW23rd PL SW 28th PL SW23rd CT SWLogan CT30th AVE SW54th ST SW20th PL SW 2 0 t h A V E S W Washington LN 42nd ST SW4 9 t h T E R S W21st PL SW 2 5 t h P L S W 54th TER SW26th PL SW49th LN SW17th PL SW Heritage CIR 53rd LN SW52nd LN SWJefferson LN 43rd ST SW22nd AVE SW 53rd ST SWHemingway CIR 42nd TER SWC o r a l P a l m s L N Lucerne RD43rd TER SWSunnyland LN Hemingway LN E 20th CT SWLaurel Ridge LN 1 9 t h AV E S W 53rd ST SWTropical WAY2 8 t h A V E S W 22nd AVE SW 19th CT SW 15 th AVE SW 2 9 th A V E S W26th PL SW42nd ST SW29 t h P L S W 27 th C T S W 25 th AVE SW 50th TER SW45th ST SW16th PL SW 20th AVE SW 44th TER SW30 th AV E S W 51st S T S W 46th ST SW4 4 t h T ER S W55th TER SW25th PL SW50th ST S W 19th CT SW 18th AVE SW 19 t h C T S W 17th AVE SW 4 5 t h S T S W45th ST SW2 8 t h A V E S W 25th AVE SW 46th ST SW4 4 t h ST SW2 0 th P L S W 19th PL SW 21st AVE SW 55th ST SW16th PL SW 22nd AVE SW 46th TER SW43rd TER SW27th PL SW18th CT SW 19th PL SW 23rd AVE SW 25 th C T S W 20th AVE SW 4 7 t h S T S W19th PL SW 51st ST SW50th TER SW18 th AVE SW 44th ST SW2 6 t h A V E S W 5 3r d ST SW20 th P L S W 52nd S T S W 30 th AVE SW 17th PL SW 17 th AVE SW 2 8 t h P L S W21st PL SW41st TER SW54th TER SW17th PL SW 49th ST SW23rd PL SW 19th AVE SW 21st AVE SW Toucan ALY54th ST SW22nd PL SW 52nd TE R S W 21st PL SW 17 th AVE SW 25th AVE SW 41st ST SW50th ST SW20th PL SW 27th AVE SW28th AVE SW51st TER SW45th TER SW23rd CT SW 17th AVE SW 5 4 t h S T S Wº0 1,000 2,000500 FeetPREPARED BY: BETH YANG, AICPGROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENTFILE: Golden Gate Estates Com mercial Infill Subdistrict.mxdDATE: 07/2019 URBAN GOLDEN GATE ESTATES COMMERCIAL INFILL SUBDISTRICTCOLLIER COUNTY, FLO RI DA LEGEND URBAN GOLDEN GATE ESTATES COMMERCIALINFILL SUBDISTRICT AMENDED - JANUARY 25, 2007(Ord. No. 2007-19)AMENDED - OCTOBER 14, 2008(Ord. No. 2008-59) AMENDED - SEPTEMBER 10, 2003(Ord. No. 2003-44) GMPA-PL20180000261 Page 19 of 29 8.A.2 Packet Pg. 80 Attachment: Memo CCPC adoption recommendations (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy- GMPA-PL20180000261 Page 20 of 29 8.A.2 Packet Pg. 81 Attachment: Memo CCPC adoption recommendations (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261-CPSP-2018-2) GREEN BLVD GOLDEN GATE PKWY LOGANBLVDSANTABARBARABLVDI-75I-75I-75I-75 IMMOKALEE RD COLLIER BLVDLIVINGSTON RDPINE RI DGE RD AIRPORT PULLING RD NGOLDEN GATE BLVD W VANDERBILT BEACH RD URBAN GOLDEN GATE ESTATESNEIGHBORHOOD CENTERCollier County, Florid a AMENDED - OCTOBER 26, 2004(Ord. No. 2004-71)AMENDED - JANUARY 25, 2007(Ord. No. 2007-19) AMEN DED - SEPTEMBER 10, 2003(Ord. No. 2003-44) AMENDED - OCTOBER 14, 2008(Ord. No. 2008-59) AMEN DED - SEPTEMBER 14, 2011(Ord. No. 2011-29) URBAN GOLDEN GATE ESTATESNEIGHBORHOOD CENTERSLEGEND URBAN GOLDEN GATE ESTATESNEIGHBORHOOD CENTER01230.5 Miles ³ PREPARED BY: BETH YANG, AICPGROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENTFILE: Urban Golden Gate Estates Neighborhood Centers.mxdDATE: 07/2019GMPA-PL20180000261 Page 21 of 29 8.A.2 Packet Pg. 82 Attachment: Memo CCPC adoption recommendations (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261-CPSP-2018-2) Words underlined are added, and words struck through are deleted as CCPC recommended adoption changes. Rural Golden Gate Estates Master Plan Sub-Element 2. Neighborhood Center Subdistrict b. Locations Neighborhood Centers are located along major roadways and are distributed within Golden Gate Estates according to commercial demand estimates. (See Rural Golden Gate Estates Neighborhood Centers Map). The centers are designed to concentrate all new commercial zoning, and conditional uses, as allowed in the Estates Zoning District, in locations where traffic impacts can be readily accommodated and to avoid strip and disorganized patterns of commercial and conditional use development. Three Neighborhood Centers are established as follows: i. Wilson Boulevard and Golden Gate Boulevard Center. This center consists of three quadrants at the intersection of Wilson and Golden Gate Boulevards. (See Map 10). c. Criteria for land uses at the centers are as follows: ix. Building heights shall be limited to one (1) story, with a maximum height of thirty- five (35) feet. This provision only applies east of Collier Boulevard. xiii. No building footprint shall exceed 5,000 square feet, unless the project is submitted in the form of a PUD. Walkways or courtyards shall connect adjacent buildings. This provision only applies east of Collier Boulevard. xiv. Drive-through establishments shall be limited to banks, with no more than 3 lanes; the drive-through areas shall be architecturally integrated with the rest of the building. This provision only applies east of Collier Boulevard. 4. Mission Subdistrict The Mission Subdistrict is located on the south side of Oil Well Road, approximately one- quarter mile west of Everglades Boulevard, and consists of 21.72 acres. The purpose of this Subdistrict is to provide for churches and related uses, including community outreach. The following uses are allowed: a. Churches. b. Child care centers – must be not-for-profit and affiliated with a church within the Subdistrict. c. Private schools – must be not-for-profit and affiliated with a church within the Subdistrict. d. Individual and family social services (activity centers, elderly or handicapped only; day care centers, adult and handicapped only) – must be not-for-profit and affiliated with a church within the Subdistrict. e. Medical outreach to the community, to include activities such as administering influenza vaccine, checking blood pressure, and conducting blood donation drives – must be not-for-profit and affiliated with a church within the Subdistrict. f. Soup kitchens and homeless shelters are prohibited in this Subdistrict. GMPA-PL20180000261 Page 22 of 29 8.A.2 Packet Pg. 83 Attachment: Memo CCPC adoption recommendations (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261-CPSP-2018-2) Words underlined are added, and words struck through are deleted as CCPC recommended adoption changes. g. The maximum total floor area allowed in this Subdistrict is 90,000 square feet. The maximum height of buildings shall be 30 feet zoned height, except the worship center shall be permitted a zoned height of 35 feet. Development in this Subdistrict shall be designed to be compatible with the existing, and allowed future, development in the surrounding area. B. Estates – Commercial District 1. Randall Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict The Randall Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict, containing approximately 56.5 acres, is located on the south side of Randall Boulevard and Immokalee Road (CR-846), extending from 8th Street NE west to the Corkscrew Canal. This Subdistrict is comprised of the following properties: Tracts 54, 55, 71, 72, 89, 90, 107, 108, 125, 126 and 127, Golden Gate Estates, Unit 23. This Subdistrict has been designated on the Rural Golden Gate Area Estates Future Land Use Map and the Randall Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict Map. It is the intent of this Subdistrict to provide commercial goods and services to the surrounding area. 2. Estates Shopping Center Subdistrict Recognizing the need to provide for centrally located basic goods and services within a portion Northern Golden Gate Estates, the Estates Shopping Center Subdistrict has been designated on the Rural Golden Gate Area Estates Future Land Use Map. 3. OVERLAYS AND SPECIAL FEATURES A. Southern Golden Gate Estates Natural Resource Protection Overlay Southern Golden Gate Estates is identified as a Natural Resource Protection Area (NRPA) Overlay on the Rural Golden Gate Area Estates Future Land Use Map and is subject to the NRPA Overlay provisions of the FLUE. Map Series Changes Rural Golden Gate Estates Area Future Land Use Map - new map to revise name and show future land uses only within the boundary of the Rural Golden Gate Estates. Rural Golden Gate Estates Neighborhood Centers - new map to revise name and remove the Urban Golden Gate Estates Neighborhood Center location outside the boundaries of the Rural Golden Gate Estates. Immokalee Road/Randall Blvd Planning Study Area – map revised to remove redundant titles. GMPA-PL20180000261 Page 23 of 29 8.A.2 Packet Pg. 84 Attachment: Memo CCPC adoption recommendations (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261-CPSP-2018-2) COLLIER BLVDCOLLIER BLVDTA MIA MIT R L E INTERSTATE 75 INTERSTATE 75I-75I-75RANDALL BLVD C.R. 951IMMOKALEE RD C.R. 951S.R. 84 EVERGLADES BLVD SDESOTO BLVD SIMMOKALEE RD OIL WEL L RD COLLIER BLVDLIVINGSTON RDDAVIS BLVD PIN E R I D GE R D EVERGLADES BLVD NRADIO RD G.G . P KW Y DESOTO BLVD SLOGAN BLVD NSANTA BARBARA BLVDDESOTO BLVD NVANDERBILT BEACH RD GOLDE N GATE BLV D EVERGLADES BLVD SGO LDE N GATE BLV D GREEN BLVD RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK RD WILSON BLVD COUNTY BARN RDURBAN DESIGNATION THIS MAP CAN NOT BE INTERPRETED WITHOUT THE GOALS, OBJECTIVES, POLICIES AND LAND USE DESIGNATION DESCRIPTION SECTION OF THE GOLDENGATE AREA MASTER PLAN. NOTE : MIXED USE DISTRICT Urban Residential Subdist rict Downtown Cen ter Com mercial Su bdistrict ESTAT ES DESIGNATION MIXED USE DISTRICT Residentia l Estates Subdist rict Conditional Uses Subdistrict T51ST50ST49ST48ST47SR 26 E R 27 E R 28 E R 29 E GOLDEN GATEFUTURE LAND USE MAP A M E N D E D - J A N U A R Y 2 5 , 2 0 0 5(O R D . N O . 2 0 0 5 -3 ) A M E N D E D - D E C E M B E R 4 , 2 0 0 7(O R D . N O . 2 0 0 7 -7 7 )A M E N D E D - O C T O B E R 1 4 , 2 0 0 8(O R D . N O . 2 0 0 8 -5 9 )A M E N D E D - J U LY 2 8 , 2 0 1 0(O R D . N O . 2 0 1 0 -3 1 )A M E N D E D - J U LY 2 8 , 2 0 1 0(O R D . N O . 2 0 1 0 -3 2 ) A M E N D E D - N O V E M B E R 1 8 , 2 0 1 4(O R D . N O . 2 0 1 4 -4 1 ) A M E N D E D - S E P T E M B E R 1 4 , 2 0 11(O R D . N O . 2 0 11 -2 9 ) A M E N D E D - N O V E M B E R 1 0 , 2 0 1 5(O R D . N O . 2 0 1 5 -6 2 ) A D O P T E D -F E B R A R Y, 1 9 9 1 A M E N D E D - M AY 1 9 , 1 9 9 2 A M E N D E D - M AY 2 5 , 1 9 9 3 A M E N D E D - J U LY 2 7 , 1 9 9 3 A M E N D E D - A P R I L 1 2 , 1 9 9 4 A M E N D E D - M A R C H 1 4 , 1 9 9 5 A M E N D E D - O C T O B E R 2 7 , 1 9 9 7 A M E N D E D - A P R I L 1 4 , 1 9 9 8 A M E N D E D - S E P T E M B E R 8 , 1 9 9 8 A M E N D E D - F E B R U A R Y 2 3 , 1 9 9 9 A M E N D E D - M AY 9 , 2 0 0 0 A M E N D E D - M A R C H 1 3 , 2 0 0 1 A M E N D E D - M AY 1 4 , 2 0 0 2 A M E N D E D - S E P T E M B E R 1 0 , 2 0 0 3(O R D . N O . 2 0 0 3 -4 4 )A M E N D E D - O C T O B E R 2 6 , 2 0 0 4(O R D . N O . 2 0 0 4 -7 1 ) A M E N D E D - J A N U A R Y 2 5 , 2 0 0 7(O R D . N O . 2 0 0 7 -1 9 ) A M E N D E D - J U N E 1 3 ,2 0 1 7(O R D . N O . 2 0 1 7 -2 3 ) GOLDEN GATE AREAFUTURE LAND USE MAP 0 1 2 30.5 Miles PREPARED BY: G IS/MAPPING SECTIO NGROWTH MANAG EMENT DEPT.DATE: 0 5/201 8FILE: PL201 80000261 -CPSP-2 018-2 G GFL U DRAFT.MXD ° SUBJECT SITE (ADDIT IONS)CPSP-2018-2 D R A F T A M E N D E D - X X X X X(O R D . N O . X X X X ) A M E N D E D - M AY 1 0 , 2 0 1 6(O R D . N O . 2 0 1 6 -1 2 ) High Density Residential Subdistrict Mixed Use Activit y Ce nter Subdistrict Golde n Gate Urban Commercial Infill Sub district San ta Barbara Co mmercia l Subdistrict COMMERCIAL DISTRICT Conditional Use Subdist rict:Golde n Gate Parkway Spe cial Provisio ns Neig hborhood Center Subd istrict Golde n Gate ParkwayInstitional Subd istrict Mission Subdistrict Everglades-Randa ll Subdistrict Special Exceptions to Conditional Use Locational Criteria AGRICULTURAL / RURAL DESIGNATION Sou thern Golden Ga te Estates Natu ra lResource Protection Area O verlay OVERLAYS AND SPECIAL FEATURES Rural Sett lement Area District Residentia l De nsity Ba nds Interchang e Activity Center Subd istrict(As Described in the Future Land Use Element in the GM P) Comme rcial Western Estate s Infill Subdistrict Pine Ridge Road Mixed Use Subdistrict Randa ll Boule vard Commercial Subdistrict Estates Shop ping Center Subdistrict Sou thbrooke Office Subdistrict Golde n Gate Estates CommercialInfill Sub district COMMERCIAL DISTRICTCollier Boulevard Co mmercia l Subdistrict GMPA-PL20180000261 Page 24 of 29 8.A.2 Packet Pg. 85 Attachment: Memo CCPC adoption recommendations (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261-CPSP-2018-2) COLLIER BLVDCOLLIER BLVDTA MIA MIT R L E INTERSTATE 75 INTERSTATE 75I-75I-75RANDALL BLVD C.R. 951IMMOKALEE RD C.R. 951S.R. 84 EVERGLADES BLVD SDESOTO BLVD SVANDERBILT BEACH RD IMMOKALEE RD OIL WEL L RD COLLIER BLVDLIVINGSTON RDDAVIS BLVD PIN E R I D GE R D EVERGLADES BLVD NRADIO RD G.G . P KW Y DESOTO BLVD SLOGAN BLVD NSANTA BARBARA BLVDDESOTO BLVD NVANDERBILT BEACH RD GOLDE N GATE BLV D EVERGLADES BLVD SGOLDE N GATE BLV D GREEN BLVD RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK RD WILSON BLVD COUNTY BARN RDT51ST50ST49ST48ST47SR 26 E R 27 E R 28 E R 29 E RURAL GOLDEN GATEFUTURE LAND USE MAP 0 1 2 30.5 Miles PREPARED BY: BETH YANG, AICPGROWTH MANAG EMENT DEPT.DATE: 2 /2019FILE: RURAL G OLDEN G ATE ESTATES FLU MAP.MXD ° RURAL GOLDEN GATE ESTATESFUTURE LAND USE MAP AGRICULTURAL / RURAL DESIGNATION Sou thern Golden Ga te Estates Natu ra lResource Protection Area O verlay OVERLAYS AND SPECIAL FEAT URES ESTAT ES DESIGNATION MIXED USE DISTRICT Residentia l Estates Subdist rict Neig hborhood Center Subd istrict Rural Sett lement Area District Conditional Uses Subdistrict COMMERCIAL DISTRICT Mission Subdistrict Everglades-Randa ll Subdistrict Randa ll Boule vard Commercial Subdistrict Estates Shop ping Center Subdistrict THIS MAP CAN NOT BE INTERPRETED WITHOUT THE GOALS, OBJECTIVES, POLICIES AND LAND USE DESIGNATION DESCRIPTION SECTION OF THE GOLDENGATE AREA MASTER PLAN. NOTE : A D O P T E D - X X X X , 2 0 1 9 GMPA-PL20180000261 Page 25 of 29 8.A.2 Packet Pg. 86 Attachment: Memo CCPC adoption recommendations (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261-CPSP-2018-2) GMPA-PL20180000261 Page 26 of 29 8.A.2 Packet Pg. 87 Attachment: Memo CCPC adoption recommendations (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261-CPSP-2018-2) IMMOKALEE RD INTERSTATE - 75 IMM OKALEE RD OIL WELL RD COLLIER BLVDEVERGLADES BLVD NDESOTO BLVD SDESOTO BLVD NEVERGLADES BLVD SGOLDEN GATE BLVD W WILSON BLVD NVANDERBILT BEACH RD EXT RURAL GOLDEN GATE ESTATESNEIGHBORHOOD CENTERS Collier County, Florid a AMENDED - OCTOBER 26, 2004(Ord. No. 2004-71)AMENDED - JANUARY 25, 2007(Ord. No. 2007-19) AMENDED - SEPTEMBER 10, 2003(Ord. No. 2003-44) AMENDED - OCTOBER 14, 2008(Ord. No. 2008-59)AMENDED - SEPTEMBER 14, 2011(Ord. No. 2011-29) 0 1 2 30.5 Miles ³ PREPARED BY: BETH YANG, AICPGROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENTFILE: Golden Gate Estates Neighborhood Centers.mxdDATE: 07/2019 RURAL GOLDEN GATE ESTATESNEIGHBORHOOD CENTERSLEGEND RURAL GOLDEN GATE ESTATESNEIGHBORHOOD CENTERS GMPA-PL20180000261 Page 27 of 29 8.A.2 Packet Pg. 88 Attachment: Memo CCPC adoption recommendations (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261-CPSP-2018-2) WILSON BLVDWILSON BLVDOIL WELL RD RANDALL BLVDIMMOKALEE RD4th ST NW2nd ST NW35th AVE NW 37th AVE NW 20th AVE NW 25th AVE NE C h e s a p e a k e B a y C T Ocean Bluff CT 20th AVE NE 35th AVE NE 24th AVE NE 37th AVE NE 20th AVE NE4th ST NEWilson BLVD N33rd AVE NE 2nd ST NERanda ll Blvd Commerc ial Subdistrict ¯ I MM O K A L E E R D Or ange Tree GMPA-PL20180000261 Page 28 of 29 8.A.2 Packet Pg. 89 Attachment: Memo CCPC adoption recommendations (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261-CPSP-2018-2) WILSON BLVDWILSON BLVDOIL WELL RD RANDALL BLVDIMMOKALEE RD4th ST NW2nd ST NW35th AVE NW 37th AVE NW 20th AVE NW 25th AVE NE C h e s a p e a k e B a y C T Ocean Bluff CT 20th AVE NE 35th AVE NE 24th AVE NE 37th AVE NE 20th AVE NE4th ST NE33rd AVE NE 2nd ST NEI MM O K A L E E R D Or ange Tree IMM OKALEE ROAD/RANDALL BLVD PLANNING STUDY AREA PREPARED BY: BETH YANG, AICPGROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENTFILE: Imm Rand al Study Area.mxdDATE: 07/201 9 0 1,000 2,000 3,000500Feet ADOPTED - XXXXX, 2019(Ord. No. XXXX-XX) LEGEND IMMO KALEE RD/RANDALL BLVD PLANNING STUDY AREA RESIDENTIAL ESTATES SUBDISTRICT RANDALL BLVD COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT RURAL SETTLEMENT AREA SUBDISTRICT ¯ GMPA-PL20180000261 Page 29 of 29 8.A.2 Packet Pg. 90 Attachment: Memo CCPC adoption recommendations (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261-CPSP-2018-2) The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. EXHIBIT “A” COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN ELEMENT Prepared by Collier County Zoning Division Prepared for COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Adopted (date) GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 1 of 9 8.A.3 Packet Pg. 91 Attachment: 1 CCPC Adoption Recommendations GGAMP element (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261-CPSP-2018- Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element ii The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. AMENDMENTS TO COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN – prior to 2019 GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN DATE AMENDED ORDINANCE NO. * Indicates adopted portions ** Ordinance No. 2000-25 rescinded and repealed in its entirety Collier County Ordinance No. 99-63, which had the effect of rescinding certain EAR-based (1996 EAR) objectives and policies at issue in Administration Commission Case No. ACC-99-02 (DOAH Case No. 98-0324GM). *** Ordinance No. 2000-26 amended Ordinance No. 89-05, as amended, the Collier County Growth Management Plan, having the effect of rescinding certain EAR-based (1996 EAR) objectives and policies at issue in Administration Commission Case No. ACC-99-02 (DOAH Case No. 98-0324GM), more specifically portions of the Intergovernmental Coordination Element (Ord. No. 98-56), Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge (Ord. No. 97-59) and Drainage (Ord. No. 97-61) sub-elements of the Public Facilities Element, Housing Element (Ord. No. 97-63), Golden Gate Area Master Plan (Ord. No. 97-64), Conservation and Coastal Management Element (Ord. No. 97-66), and the Future Land May 9, 2000 2000-25 ** May 9, 2000 2000-26 *** May 9, 2000 2000-27 May 9, 2000 2000-28 May 9, 2000 2000-29 March 13, 2001 2001-12 May 14, 2002 2002-24 September 10, 2003 2003-44 December 16, 2003 2003-67 October 26, 2004 2004-71 June 7, 2005 2005-25 January 25, 2007 2007-19 December 4, 2007 2007-76 December 4, 2007 2007-77 December 4, 2007 2007-83 October 14, 2008 2008-55 October 14, 2008 2008-56 October 14, 2008 2008-59 July 28, 2010 2010-31 July 28, 2010 2010-32 September 14, 2011 2011-29 January 9, 2013 2013-15 November 18, 2014 2014-41 November 10, 2015 2015-62 May 10, 2016 2016-12 June 13, 2017 2017-23 GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 2 of 9 8.A.3 Packet Pg. 92 Attachment: 1 CCPC Adoption Recommendations GGAMP element (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261-CPSP-2018- Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element iii The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. Use Element and Future Land Use Map (Ord. No. 97-67); and readopting Policy 2.2.3 of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan. • The above Ordinance No. 2007-19 is based on the 2004 Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR). • The above Ordinance No. 2013-15 is based on the 2011 Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR). AMENDMENTS TO COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN – prior to 2000 GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN DATE AMENDED ORDINANCE NO. May 19, 1992 92-34 August 4, 1992 92-50 May 25, 1993 93-24 April 12, 1994 94-22 March 14, 1995 95-12 April 14, 1998 98-26 September 8, 1998 98-70 February 23, 1999 99-17 Note: All of the above amendments occurred after adoption of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan in 1991 (Ord. No. 91-15) and prior to adoption of amendments on ___, 2019. Due to the restructuring of this Element in 2019 to create three Sub-Elements, these amendments are no longer denoted on the pages of the Element with Roman numeral symbols that provide informational citations to adopted documents recorded in the Official Records of Collier County. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 3 of 9 8.A.3 Packet Pg. 93 Attachment: 1 CCPC Adoption Recommendations GGAMP element (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261-CPSP-2018- Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element iv The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. INTRODUCTION 1 II. OVERVIEW 2 A. County-Wide Planning Process B. Golden Gate Area Planning Process III. MAPS _Golden Gate Area Master Plan Study Areas 4 GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 4 of 9 8.A.3 Packet Pg. 94 Attachment: 1 CCPC Adoption Recommendations GGAMP element (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261-CPSP-2018- Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element 1 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. I. INTRODUCTION As part of the revised Growth Management Plan, the County adopted the original Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) in 1991. The GGAMP was further revised in 1997. The Golden Gate Area Master Plan provides growth management regulations for the designated Golden Gate Area as shown on the Golden Gate Area Master Plan Study Areas Map. The Golden Gate Area was previously subject to the regulations outlined in the County's Future Land Use Element (FLUE). However, in 1991, the unique characteristics of the area resulted in adoption of a Master Plan for Golden Gate, as a separate Element of the Collier County Growth Management Plan. This Master Plan superseded former Objective 1, Policy 1.1, and Policy 1.3 of the FLUE. All other Goals, Objectives, and Policies contained in the FLUE and all other Elements of the Growth Management Plan remain applicable to the Golden Gate Area. In addition, the Golden Gate Area Future Land Use Map will be used instead of the County-Wide Future Land Use Map. In April 1996, the Board of County Commissioners adopted the Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) for Collier County. As a result of the recommendations made in the EAR, Ordinance 91- 15, which adopted the original Golden Gate Area Master Plan, was repealed and a new Ordinance 97-64 was adopted. In February of 2001, the Board of County Commissioners directed staff to initiate a restudy of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan. Accordingly, in June of 2001, Comprehensive Planning Section Staff requested that the Board appoint an advisory committee, consisting of residents of Golden Gate City and Golden Gate Estates, to aid Staff in the restudy process. The Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy Committee met on over twenty (20) occasions, between June 2001 and June 2003, to consider proposed amendments to the GGAMP, as well as other matters related to the Golden Gate Area. All meetings were open to the public; many of these meetings were well attended. The restudy process was divided into two phases. The County transmitted Phase I amendments to the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA) in April 2003. These amendments were adopted, as Ordinance 2003-44, in September 2003. Phase II amendments were transmitted in June 2004. The Phase II amendments were adopted in October 2004, as Ordinance 2004-71. In February 2015, the Board of County Commissioners directed staff to initiate another restudy of the GGAMP. Staff evaluated the Golden Gate Area within 3 distinct areas: 1) Golden Gate City; 2) Rural Golden Gate Estates, defined as Golden Gate Estates east of Collier Boulevard; and 3) Urban Golden Gate Estates, defined as Golden Gate Estates west of Collier Boulevard. Guided by an Oversight Committee, staff conducted eight public workshops along with electronic outreach to gather resident and stakeholder opinions. Most fundamentally, the vision statements created by consensus within the sub-areas of the Golden Gate Area are as follows: Golden Gate City Vision Statement: Golden Gate City is a safe, diverse, family-oriented community that offers easy access to education, parks, shopping and services within a vibrant, walkable community. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 5 of 9 8.A.3 Packet Pg. 95 Attachment: 1 CCPC Adoption Recommendations GGAMP element (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261-CPSP-2018- Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element 2 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. Rural Golden Gate Estates Vision Statement: The Rural Golden Gate Estates is an interconnected, low-density residential community with limited goods and services in neighborhood centers, defined by rural character with appreciation for nature and quiet surroundings. Urban Golden Gate Estates Vision Statement: Urban Golden Gate Estates is a low-density, large-lot residential neighborhood in a natural setting with convenient access to the coastal area. Implementation strategies have been developed to address land use, public facilities, transportation, rural character, emergency management and natural resources. The Goals, Objectives, and Policies, Land Use Designation Descriptions and Maps are implemented as separate sub-elements for three distinct areas: 1. Golden Gate City Master Plan Sub-Element; 2. Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element; and 3. Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element. [REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 6 of 9 8.A.3 Packet Pg. 96 Attachment: 1 CCPC Adoption Recommendations GGAMP element (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261-CPSP-2018- Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element 3 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. II. OVERVIEW A. COUNTY-WIDE PLANNING PROCESS Pursuant to Section 163.3177(6), Florida Statutes, the Collier County Growth Management Plan shall contain the following elements: 1. Future Land Use 2. Housing 3. Public Facilities 4. Conservation and Coastal Management (Coastal Counties only) 5. Intergovernmental Coordination 6. Capital Improvements 7. Transportation 8. Recreation and Open Space In addition to the above Elements, local government comprehensive plans in Florida may, by decision of the local legislative body, contain one or more optional elements. Optional elements are required to comply with certain general criteria under Section 163.3177, Florida Statutes, but are not subject to specific requirements (with some exceptions). In 1991, the Board of County Commissioners chose the option of adopting the Golden Gate Area Master Plan, in recognition of the unique characteristics of the Golden Gate Area. In addition to establishing the Collier County Growth Management Plan’s mandatory structure, Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, also subjects the Plan to a mandatory evaluation process every seven (7) years. This process involves the preparation of an Evaluation and Appraisal Review (EAR) to determine whether, and to what extent, the existing Growth Management Plan has carried out its stated Goals, Objectives and Policies. B. GOLDEN GATE AREA PLANNING PROCESS Objective 4 of the Collier County Future Land Use Element (FLUE) allows the countywide planning process to “address specific geographic or issue areas.” Policy 4.1 of this Objective reads as follows: “A detailed Master Plan for Golden Gate Estates has been developed and was incorporated into this Growth Management Plan in February 1991. The Master Plan addresses Natural Resources, Future Land Use, Water Management, Public Facilities and other considerations.” In February 1991, the Board of County Commissioners adopted the original Golden Gate Area Master Plan. The original Master Plan incorporated the recommendations of a Citizens Steering Committee. A revised and updated Master Plan was adopted in 1997, pursuant to recommendations of the County’s 1996 Evaluation and Appraisal Report. In 2001, the Board of County Commissioners established the Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy Committee and directed Staff to work with the Committee to further revise and update the Master Plan. The Board of County Commissioners adopted revisions to the GGAMP, incorporating the recommendations of the Restudy Committee, in 2003 and 2004. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 7 of 9 8.A.3 Packet Pg. 97 Attachment: 1 CCPC Adoption Recommendations GGAMP element (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261-CPSP-2018- Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element 4 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. III. Maps _Golden Gate Area Master Plan Study Areas GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 8 of 9 8.A.3 Packet Pg. 98 Attachment: 1 CCPC Adoption Recommendations GGAMP element (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261-CPSP-2018- IMMOKALEE RD INTERSTATE - 75 LAKETRAFFORD SR 29IMMOKALEE RD OIL WE LL RD COLLIER BLVDSR 82 LIVINGSTON RDTAMIAMI TRL NSR 29 NSAN MARCO RDDAVIS BLVDGOODLETTE RD NPINE RIDGE RD EVERGLADES BLVD NAIRPORT PULLING RD DESOTO BLVD SDESOTO BLVD N9TH ST NVANDERBILT DREVERGLADES BLVD SCORKSCREW RDGOLDEN GATE BLVD W COPELAND AVE SS 1ST STOLD US 41LAKE TRAFFORD RD WILSON BLVD NBONITA BEACH RD COLLIER AVE111 TH AVE N NE W MARKET RD W VANDERBILT BEACH RD 9TH ST SSEAGATE DR GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 0 2 4 61Miles³PREPARED BY: BETH YANG, AICPGROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENTFILE: Golden Gate Area Master Plan Areas.mxdDATE: 07/2019 STUDY AREA AMENDED - OCTOBER 14, 2008(Ord. No. 2008-59) AMENDED - OCTOBER 26, 2004(Ord. No. 2004-71) CITYOFNAPLES MARCOISLANDGUL F OF MEXI COLEGEND Golden Gate City Urban Golden Gate Estates Rural Golden Gate Estates GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 9 of 9 8.A.3 Packet Pg. 99 Attachment: 1 CCPC Adoption Recommendations GGAMP element (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261-CPSP-2018- Golden Gate City Sub-Element The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. “Exhibit A” GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN GOLDEN GATE CITY SUB-ELEMENT Prepared by Collier County Zoning Division Prepared for COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Adopted (date) GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 1 of 21 8.A.4 Packet Pg. 100 Attachment: 2 CCPC Adoption Recommendations GG City sub element (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261-CPSP- Golden Gate City Sub-Element ii The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. AMENDMENTS TO COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN: GOLDEN GATE CITY SUB-ELEMENT DATE AMENDED ORDINANCE NO. (date), 2019 2019-(#) GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 2 of 21 8.A.4 Packet Pg. 101 Attachment: 2 CCPC Adoption Recommendations GG City sub element (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261-CPSP- iii The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page A. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES 1 B. LAND USE DESIGNATION DESCRIPTION SECTION 6 1. URBAN DESIGNATION A. Urban ‒ Mixed Use District 7 1. Urban Residential Subdistrict 2. High Density Residential Subdistrict 3. Downtown Center Commercial Subdistrict B. Urban ‒ Commercial District 9 1. Mixed Use Activity Center Subdistrict 2. Golden Gate Urban Commercial Infill Subdistrict 3. Santa Barbara Commercial Subdistrict 4. Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict C. LIST OF MAPS 11 Golden Gate City Future Land Use Map High Density Residential Subdistrict 1989 Boundaries of Activity Centers Downtown Center Commercial Subdistrict Urban Mixed Use Activity Centers Golden Gate Parkway and Coronado Parkway Golden Gate City Urban Commercial Infill Subdistrict Santa Barbara Commercial Subdistrict Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 3 of 21 8.A.4 Packet Pg. 102 Attachment: 2 CCPC Adoption Recommendations GG City sub element (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261-CPSP- Golden Gate City Sub-Element 1 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. A. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES GOAL 1: TO GUIDE LAND USE AND PUBLIC FACILITY DECISION MAKING AND TO BALANCE THE NEED TO PROVIDE BASIC SERVICES WITH NATURAL RESOURCE CONCERNS THROUGH A WELL PLANNED MIX OF COMPATIBLE LAND USES WHICH ENSURE THE HEALTH, SAFETY, WELFARE, AND QUALITY OF LIFE OF THE LOCAL RESIDENTS. OBJECTIVE 1.1: Develop new or revised uses of land consistent with designations outlined on the Golden Gate City Future Land Use Map and provisions found in the Land Use Designation Description Section of this Element. Policy 1.1.1: The Policies under the above Objective shall identify the Future Land Use Designations, Districts, and Subdistricts for Golden Gate City. Policy 1.1.2: The Land Use Designation Description Section of this Element shall provide the standards and permitted uses for Golden Gate City Future Land Use Districts and Subdistricts. Policy 1.1.3: The Golden Gate City Future Land Use Map and companion Future Land Use Designations, Districts, and Subdistricts shall be binding on all development orders unless otherwis e permitted in this Master Plan effective with the adoption of this Master Plan. Policy 1.1.4: The URBAN Future Land Use Designation shall include Future Land Use Districts and Subdistricts for: A. URBAN ‒ MIXED USE DISTRICT 1. Urban Residential Subdistrict 2. High Density Residential Subdistrict 3. Downtown Center Commercial Subdistrict B. URBAN ‒ COMMERCIAL DISTRICT 1. Mixed Use Activity Center Subdistrict 2. Golden Gate Urban Commercial Infill Subdistrict 3. Santa Barbara Commercial Subdistrict 4. Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict Policy 1.1.5: No development orders shall be issued inconsistent with the Golden Gate City Sub-Element with the exception of those unimproved properties granted a positive determination through the Zoning Re-evaluation Program and identified on the Future Land Use Map Series as properties consistent by Policy and those development orders issued pursuant to conditional uses and rezones approved based on the County-Wide Future Land Use Element (adopted January 10, 1989, Ordinance 89-05) which was in effect at the time of approval. Any subsequent development orders shall also be reviewed for consistency with the Growth Management Plan based on the County-Wide Future Land Use Element. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 4 of 21 8.A.4 Packet Pg. 103 Attachment: 2 CCPC Adoption Recommendations GG City sub element (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261-CPSP- 2 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. Policy 1.1.6: The sites containing existing public educational plants and ancillary plants, and the undeveloped sites owned by the Collier County School Board for future public educational plants and ancillary plants, within the GGAMP area, are depicted on the Future Land Use Map Series in the countywide FLUE and on the Public School Facilities Element Map Series, and referenced in FLUE Policy 5.14 and Intergovernmental Coordination Element Policy 1.2.6. All of these sites are subject to the general Interlocal Agreement, adopted on May 15, 2003 by the Collier County School Board and on May 27, 2003 by the Board of County Commissioners, and as subsequently amended and restated, with an effective date of December 2008, and subject to the implementing land development regulations to be adopted. OBJECTIVE 1.2: Ensure public facilities are provided at an acceptable level of service. Policy 1.2.1: Requests for new uses of land shall be subject to level of service standards and concurrency requirements for public facilities as outlined in the Capital Improvement Element of the Growth Management Plan. OBJECTIVE 1.3: Protect and preserve the valuable natural resources within Golden Gate City. Policy 1.3.1: The County shall protect and preserve natural resources within Golden Gate City in accordance with the Objectives and Policies contained within Goals 6 and 7 of the Collier County Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME). Policy 1.3.2: Collier County shall coordinate its planning and permitting activities within Golden Gate City with all other applicable environmental planning, permitting and regulatory agencies to ensure that all Federal, State and local natural resource protection regulations are being enforced. OBJECTIVE 1.4: Provide a living environment within Golden Gate City, which is aesthetically acceptable and protects the quality of life. Policy 1.4.1: Collier County shall provide a living environment that is aesthetically acceptable and protects the quality of life through the enforcement of applicable codes and laws. Policy 1.4.2: The County's Code Enforcement Board shall strictly enforce the Land Development Code and other applicable codes and laws to control the illegal storage of machinery, vehicles and junk, and the illegal operation of commercial activities within Golden Gate City. GOAL 2: TO PRESERVE AND ENHANCE A MIX OF RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL LAND USES WITHIN GOLDEN GATE CITY THAT CREATES A SAFE, DIVERSE AND VIBRANT WALKABLE COMMUNTY CONSISTENT WITH THE STATED VISION OF GOLDEN GATE CITY. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 5 of 21 8.A.4 Packet Pg. 104 Attachment: 2 CCPC Adoption Recommendations GG City sub element (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261-CPSP- 3 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. OBJECTIVE 2.1: Provide for residential and commercial land uses that meet the needs of Golden Gate City and the surrounding area. Policy 2.1.1: Development and redevelopment within Golden Gate City shall be guided by the residential and commercial needs consistent with the stated vision of Golden Gate City. Policy 2.1.2: The County shall protect established stable neighborhoods and provide opportunity for redevelopment and renewal through development standards and practices that promote compatibility. Policy 2.1.3 Within two years, Collier County shall create development standards to guide the transformation of Golden Gate Parkway and the Activity Center into destinations that are convenient, pleasant and safe for pedestrians and cyclists, and maintain strong connections to transit service. Policy 2.1.4 The Activity Center shall allow uses intended to strengthen the economic health of Golden Gate City. Policy 2.1.5 Collier County shall discourage new land uses along Golden Gate Parkway and within the Activity Center that impede pedestrian activity and are solely auto-oriented, such as car washes, storage facilities, auto dealerships and drive throughs. Land development regulations will be initiated within two years to ensure compatibility of auto-oriented uses within the pedestrian environment. Policy 2.1.6 Residential land use designations shall support the diversity of housing types within Golden Gate City. Policy 2.1.7: Collier County shall respond to community-initiated planning programs as they may occur. Community planning programs may take into consideration the following issues: A. Affordable housing based upon home ownership; B. Commercial re-vitalization, to include: i. Sidewalks ii. Traffic calming measures iii. Improved street lighting; C. Neighborhood parks, open space and recreational centers; D. Crime reduction; E. Consistent enforcement of land development regulations; and, F. Improved lighting for streets and parking areas. OBJECTIVE 2.2: Strengthen the quality of life in Golden Gate City and the surrounding area, and promote a healthy economy through support of redevelopment and renewal in Golden Gate City with focus along Golden Gate Parkway and within the designated Activity Center. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 6 of 21 8.A.4 Packet Pg. 105 Attachment: 2 CCPC Adoption Recommendations GG City sub element (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261-CPSP- 4 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. Policy 2.2.1 Collier County shall consider the use of redevelopment tools such as tax increment financing. Policy 2.2.2 Within two years of adoption, Collier County shall initiate a community renewal plan to include economic development strategies, urban design schemes, and infrastructure improvements. Renewal plans shall be in concert with the vision of Golden Gate City and promote vibrant urbanism, improve aesthetics and support walkability. Policy 2.2.3 Within two years of adoption, Collier County shall initiate the involvement of Golden Gate City residents and business owners to consider amendments to the Land Development Code to support and implement residential and commercial redevelopment and renewal initiatives. Amendments shall include incentives for remodeling and renovation by creating criteria and standards for variances and/or deviations. Policy 2.2.4 In collaboration with the Golden Gate City residents and business owners, and other community partners such as the Greater Naples Chamber of Commerce, Collier County shall initiate a branding and marketing plan for Golden Gate City within two years of adoption. The proposed plan shall be in concert with the overall vision for Golden Gate City. Policy 2.2.5 Collier County will work to ensure pertinent economic incentive programs are made available to those seeking business creation and redevelopment opportunities. OBJECTIVE 2.3 Ensure Golden Gate City public facilities are provided at an acceptable level of service, planned and implemented in concert with the vision of Golden Gate City. Policy 2.3.1 Due to the continued use of individual septic systems and private wells within a densely platted urban area, Collier County Public Utilities will expand sewer and water service in accordance with the Implementation Report attached as Appendix A to Resolution No. 2017-222. Expansion plans shall consider the renewal areas of Golden Gate Parkway and the area surrounding the Activity Center a priority for expansion and shall coordinate its projects with scheduled road and/or stormwater improvements to maximize efficiency and minimize disruption to businesses and residents. Policy 2.3.2 Collier County will support all transportation needs within Golden Gate City with an emphasis on walkability. Walkability will be improved through the implementation of the recommendations of the Metropolitan Planning Organization’s Walkability Study. Policy 2.3.3 Redevelopment within the Activity Center shall maintain multiple access points to the surrounding neighborhoods and through the Activity Center while providing safe and direct access to transit stops within or adjacent to the Activity Center. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 7 of 21 8.A.4 Packet Pg. 106 Attachment: 2 CCPC Adoption Recommendations GG City sub element (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261-CPSP- 5 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. Policy 2.3.4 Alleys in Golden Gate City may only be vacated if such vacation does not prevent reasonable connection and continuity for future pedestrian, non-motorized and transit trips. Within one year of adoption, Resolution 2013-166 shall be amended to implement this policy. Policy 2.3.5 To ensure a safe and pleasant pedestrian environment, Collier County shall periodically conduct speed studies in Golden Gate City. When appropriate, traffic calming measures and speed limit reductions may be implemented. [REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 8 of 21 8.A.4 Packet Pg. 107 Attachment: 2 CCPC Adoption Recommendations GG City sub element (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261-CPSP- 6 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. B. LAND USE DESIGNATION DESCRIPTION SECTION The following section describes the three land use designations shown on the Golden Gate City Future Land Use Map. These designations generally indicate the types of land uses for which zoning may be requested. However, these land use designations do not guarantee that a zoning request will be approved. Requests may be denied by the Board of County Commissioners based on criteria in the Land Development Code or in special studies completed for the County. 1. URBAN DESIGNATION: URBAN MIXED-USE DISTRICT AND URBAN COMMERCIAL DISTRICT Urban Designated Areas on the Future Land Use Map include two general portions of Collier County: areas with the greatest residential densities and areas in close proximity, which have or are projected to receive future urban support facilities and services. It is intended that Urban Designated areas accommodate the majority of population growth and that new intensive land uses be located within them. The boundaries of the Urban Designated areas have been established based on several factors including: • patterns of existing development, • patterns of approved but unbuilt development, • natural resources, water management, and hurricane risk, • existing and proposed public facilities, • population projections, and • land needed to accommodate growth. The Urban Designation will also accommodate future non-residential uses including essential services as defined by the most recently adopted Collier County Land Development Code. Other permitted non-residential land uses may include: a. parks, open space and recreational use; b. water-dependent and water-related uses; c. child care centers; d. community facilities such as _churches, cemeteries, schools, and school facilities co- located with other public facilities such as parks, libraries, and community centers, where feasible and mutually acceptable, fire and police stations; e. utility and communication facilities. f. support medical facilities such as physician's offices, medical clinics, treatment, research and rehabilitative centers and pharmacies (as long as the dominant use is medical related) may also be permitted provided they are granted concurrent with or located within ¼ mile of existing or approved hospitals or medical centers which offer primary and urgent care treatment for all types of injuries and traumas_. Stipulations to ensure that the construction of such support medical facilities is concurrent with hospitals or such medical centers shall be determined at the time of zoning approval. Group Housing shall be permitted within the Urban Mixed-Use District and Urban Commercial Districts subject to the definitions and regulations as outlined in the Collier County Land Development Code (Ordinance No. 04-41, as amended) and consistent with locational requirements in Florida Statutes (Chapter 419.001 F.S.). GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 9 of 21 8.A.4 Packet Pg. 108 Attachment: 2 CCPC Adoption Recommendations GG City sub element (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261-CPSP- 7 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. Group Housing includes the following type facilities: a. Family Care Facility if occupied by not more than six (6) persons shall be permitted in residential areas. b. Group Care Facility, c. Care Units, d. Adult Congregate Living Facilities, and e. Nursing Homes. A. Urban-Mixed Use District This district is intended to accommodate a variety of residential and commercial land uses including single-family, multi-family, duplex, and mixed use (Planned Unit Development). 1. Urban Residential Subdistrict All land within the urban mixed-use designation is zoned and platted. However, any parcel to be rezoned residential is subject to and must be consistent with the Density Rating System. DENSITY RATING SYSTEM: a. BASE DENSITY – Four (4) residential units per gross acre is the eligible density, though not an entitlement. b. DENSITY BONUSES – Density bonuses are discretionary, not entitlements, and are dependent upon meeting the criteria for each bonus provision and compatibility with surrounding properties, as well as the rezone criteria in the Land Development Code. The following densities per gross acre may be added to the base density. In no case shall the maximum permitted density exceed 16 residential dwelling units per gross acre. i. Conversion of Commercial Zoning Bonus • 16 dwelling units – If a project includes the conversion of commercial zoning that has been found to be “Consistent By Policy” through the Collier County Zoning Re- evaluation Program (Ordinance No. 90-23), then a bonus of up to 16 dwelling units per acre may be added for every one (1) acre of commercial zoning that is converted to residential zoning. These dwelling units may be distributed over the entire project. ii. Proximity to Activity Center • 3 dwelling units - Within 1 mile of Activity Center iii. Affordable Housing Bonus To encourage the provision of affordable housing within certain Districts and Subdistricts in the Urban Designated Area, a maximum of up to 12 residential units per gross acre may be added to the base density if the project meets the requirements of the Affordable Housing Density Bonus Ordinance (Section 2.06.00 of the Land Development Code, Ordinance No. 04-41, as amended) and if the affordable housing units are targeted for families earning no greater than 140% of the median income for Collier County. iv. Residential In-fill If the project is 10 acres or less in size; located within an area with central public water and sewer service; compatible with surrounding land uses; has no common site development plan with adjoining property; no common ownership with any adjacent parcels; and the parcel in question was not created to take advantage of the in-fill residential density. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 10 of 21 8.A.4 Packet Pg. 109 Attachment: 2 CCPC Adoption Recommendations GG City sub element (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261-CPSP- 8 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. • 3 dwelling units v. Roadway Access Density credits based on future roadways will be awarded if the developer commits to construct a portion of the roadway (as determined by the County) or the road is scheduled for completion during the first five years of the Capital Improvement Schedule. • Add 1 dwelling unit - if direct access to two or more arterial or collector roads as identified in the Transportation Element. c. There are Density Bands located around Activity Centers. The density band around an Activity Center shall be measured by the radial distance from the center of the intersection around which the Activity Center is situated. If 50% or more of a project is within the density band, the additional density applies to the entire project. Density bands shall not apply within the Estates Designation. 2. High Density Residential Subdistrict: To encourage higher density residential and promote mixed uses in close proximity to Activity Centers, those residential zoned properties permitting up to 12 dwelling units per acre which were located within and consistent with the Activity Center designation at Golden Gate Parkway and Coronado Parkway established by the 1989 Collier County Growth Management Plan and subsequently removed by the creation of a new Activity Center via the adoption of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan are recognized as being consistent with this Master Plan and are outlined on the High Density Residential Subdistrict Map. 3. Downtown Center Commercial Subdistrict: The primary purpose of the Downtown Center Commercial Subdistrict (see Downtown Center Commercial Subdistrict Map) is to encourage redevelopment along Golden Gate Parkway in order to improve the physical appearance of the area and create a vibrant and viable downtown district within Golden Gate City. Emphasis shall be placed on the creation of a pedestrian-oriented boulevard. The provisions of this Subdistrict are intended to ensure harmonious development of commercial and mixed-use buildings at a pedestrian scale that are compatible with residential development within and outside of the Subdistrict. The Subdistrict allows the aggregation of properties in order to promote flexibility in site design. The types of uses permitted within this Subdistrict are low intensity retail, office, personal services, institutional, and residential. Non-residential development is intended to serve the needs of residents within the Subdistrict, surrounding neighborhoods, and passersby. a. All development or redevelopment within the boundaries of the Downtown Center Commercial Subdistrict shall include: i. Provisions for bicycle and pedestrian travel. ii. An emphasis on building aesthetics. ii. Emphasis on the orderly circulation of vehicular, bicycle and pedestrian traffic. iii. Provision for broad sidewalks. iv. Enhanced streetscaping. v. Project interconnections, where possible and feasible. vi. Quality designs for building façades, including lighting, uniform signage and landscaping. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 11 of 21 8.A.4 Packet Pg. 110 Attachment: 2 CCPC Adoption Recommendations GG City sub element (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261-CPSP- 9 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. b. Permitted uses within this Subdistrict shall include only the following, except as may be restricted in an implementing zoning overlay district, and except as may be prohibited in Paragraph D, below: i. Those uses permitted by right within the C-1, C-2 and C-3 Zoning Districts, as outlined in the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC); ii. Residential uses permitted by right in the existing residential zoning districts in this Subdistrict; iii. Those permitted uses that may be allowed in an implementing zoning overlay district. c. Conditional uses allowed by this Subdistrict shall include only: i. Those conditional uses allowed within the C-1, C-2 and C-3 Zoning Districts, as outlined in the LDC; ii. Those conditional uses allowed, by the LDC, within existing residential Zoning Districts in this Subdistrict; iii. Those conditional uses that may be allowed in an implementing zoning overlay district; and, d. Prohibited uses in this Subdistrict are as follows: i. Automatic food and drink vending machines located exterior to a building. ii. Any commercial use employing drive-up, drive-in or drive-through delivery of goods or services. iii. Enameling, painting or plating as a primary use. However, these uses are permitted if secondary to an artist’s or craft studio. iv. Single-room occupancy hotels, prisons, detention facilities, halfway houses, soup kitchens or homeless shelters. v. Uses as may be prohibited in an implementing zoning overlay district. B. Urban Commercial District 1. Mixed Use Activity Center Subdistrict The Activity Center designated on the Future Land Use Map is intended to accommodate commercial zoning within the Urban Designated Area. Activity Centers are intended to be mixed-use (commercial, residential, institutional) in character. The Activity Center concept is designed to concentrate new and existing commercial zoning in locations where traffic impacts can readily be accommodated, to avoid strip and disorganized patterns of commercial development, and to create focal points within the community. The size and configuration of the Activity Center is outlined on the Urban Mixed-Use Activity Center – Golden Gate Parkway and Coronado Parkway Map. The standard for intensity of commercial uses allowed within each Activity Center is the full array of uses allowed in the C-1 through C-5 Zoning Districts, as identified in the Land Development Code (Ordinance No. 04-41, as amended) excluding the following new commercial uses: Hotels and motels that locate within an Activity Center will be allowed to develop at a density consistent with the Land Development Code. Residential density for residential projects located within the boundaries of the Mixed-Use Activity Center shall be allowed to develop at a density of up to 22 residential units per gross acre. This density may be distributed throughout the project, including any portion located outside of the boundary of the Mixed- Use Activity Center. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 12 of 21 8.A.4 Packet Pg. 111 Attachment: 2 CCPC Adoption Recommendations GG City sub element (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261-CPSP- 10 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. Certain uses specifically intended to support economic development in Golden Gate City are allowed within the Mixed Use Activity Center. The following uses, are allowed as will be provided for in the Golden Gate Parkway Overlay District (zoning overlay). The Overlay District will include standards to address compatibility and building scale. a. Advanced manufacturing, including automated apparel_, light assembly_ and 3D printing_; b. Call centers_; c. Software development and programming_; d. Internet technologies and electronic commerce_; e. Data and information processing_; f. Professional services that are export based such as laboratory research or testing activities_; g. Other uses as may be determined by the Board of County Commissioners consistent with the intent of supporting economic development in Golden Gate City. 2. Golden Gate City Urban Commercial In-fill Subdistrict This Subdistrict is located at the southwest quadrant of C.R. 951 and Golden Gate Parkway. Due to the existing zoning and land use pattern in proximity to the Commercial In -fill Subdistrict (see Golden Gate City Urban Commercial Infill Subdistrict) and the need to ensure adequate development standards to buffer adjacent land uses, commercial uses shall be permitted under the following criteria: a. Commercial uses shall be limited to: i. Low intensity commercial uses that are compatible with both residential and intermediate commercial uses, in order to provide for small scale shopping and personal needs, and ii. Intermediate commercial to provide for a wider variety of goods and services in areas that have a higher degree of automobile traffic. These uses shall be similar to C-1, C-2, or C-3 zoning districts outlined in the Collier County Land Development Code (Ordinance 91-102), adopted October 30, 1991. b. Rezones shall be encouraged in the form of a Planned Unit Development (there shall be no minimum acreage requirement for PUD rezones except for the requirement that all requests for rezoning must be at least forty thousand (40,000) square feet in area unless the proposed rezone is an extension of an existing zoning district consistent with the Golden Gate Area Master Plan); c. Projects within this Subdistrict shall make provisions for shared parking arrangements with adjoining commercial developments when appropriate; d. Driveways and curb cuts for projects within this Subdistrict shall be consolidated with adjoining commercial developments; and e. Access to projects shall not be permitted from Collier Boulevard. 3. Santa Barbara Commercial Subdistrict The boundaries of the Subdistrict are hereby expanded to include the former Commercial Subdistrict and also to extend approximately one (1) block to the east of the former boundary (see Santa Barbara Commercial Subdistrict Map). The intent of the Santa Barbara Commercial Subdistrict is to provide Golden Gate City with an area that is primarily commercial, with an allowance for certain conditional uses. The types of uses permitted within this Subdistrict are low intensity retail, offices, personal services, and institutional uses, such as _churches and day care centers. Such development is intended to serve the needs of residents within the Subdistrict and surrounding neighborhoods and persons traveling nearby. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 13 of 21 8.A.4 Packet Pg. 112 Attachment: 2 CCPC Adoption Recommendations GG City sub element (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261-CPSP- 11 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. Commercial and institutional uses permitted within this Subdistrict are those that: a. Generate/attract relatively low traffic volumes; b. Are appropriately landscaped and buffered to protect nearby residential properties; and c. Are architecturally designed to be compatible with nearby residential areas. 4. Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict The primary purpose of the Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict (see Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict Map) is to encourage redevelopment along Collier Boulevard in order to improve the physical appearance of the area. This Subdistrict is intended to allow a mix of uses, including heavy commercial within those areas presently zoned C-5. This Subdistrict includes properties zoned RMF-12, C-4, and C-5. This Subdistrict will allow commercial development on lands presently zoned residential. Buildings shall be limited to three stories, not to exceed 50 feet, inclusive of under building parking. _The Land Development Code shall be amended to establish a zoning overlay containing regulations to implement this Subdistrict. a. All development and redevelopment within this Subdistrict shall include: 1. Provisions for bicycle and pedestrian travel. 2. An emphasis on building aesthetics. 3. Emphasis on the orderly circulation of vehicular, bicycle and pedestrian traffic. 4. Provision for adequate ingress and egress, which may include local street vacation or relocation if alternative access is provided. 5. Provision for broad sidewalks or pathways. 6. Enhanced streetscaping. 7. Shared parking and/or property interconnections, where possible and feasible. 8. Quality designs for building facades, including lighting, uniform signage and landscaping. C. LIST OF MAPS Golden Gate City Future Land Use Map High Density Residential Subdistrict 1989 Boundaries of Activity Center Downtown Center Commercial Subdistrict Urban Mixed Use Activity Center/Golden Gate Parkway and Coronado Parkway Golden Gate City Urban Commercial Infill Subdistrict Santa Barbara Commercial Subdistrict Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 14 of 21 8.A.4 Packet Pg. 113 Attachment: 2 CCPC Adoption Recommendations GG City sub element (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261-CPSP- INTERSTATE 75COLLIER BLVDDowntown Center Commercial Subdis trict Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Mixed Use Activity Center Subdistrict Downtown Center Commercial Subdis trict Santa Barbara Commercial Subdis tr ict Golden G ate Urban Commerc ial Infill Subdistrict GOLDEN GATE PKY SANTA BARBARA BLVDGREEN BLVD PROPOSED GOLDE N GATE CITY FUTURE LAND USE MAP AdditionAddition Addition Legend Category Golden Gate Urban Commercial Infill Subdistrict Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Downtown Center Commercial Subdistrict Santa Barbara Commercial Subdistrict Urban Residential Subdistrict Mixed Use Activity Center Subdistrict Addition ¯ THIS MAP CAN NOT B E INTERPRET ED WITHOUT THE GOALS, OBJECTIV ES, POLICIE S AND LAND USE DESIGNAT ION DESCRIPT ION SECTION OF THE GOL DEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN. NOTE: 0 1,000 2,000 3,000500Feet PREPARED BY: BETH YANG, AICPGROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENTFILE: Pro posed Golden Gate City FLU.mxdDATE: 07/201 9 ADOPTED - XXXXX, 2019(Ord. No. XXXX-XX) GOLDEN GATE CITY FUTURE LAND USE MAPT49S R 26 EGMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 15 of 21 8.A.4 Packet Pg. 114 Attachment: 2 CCPC Adoption Recommendations GG City sub element (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 16 of 21 8.A.4 Packet Pg. 115 Attachment: 2 CCPC Adoption Recommendations GG City sub element (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261-CPSP- Golden Gate PKWY Collier BLVD44th ST SW23rd AVE SW 55th TER SWTropical WAYSanta Barbara BLVDCoronado PKWY 47th ST SW24th AVE SW Tropicana BLVD55th ST SW47th TER SW31 st PL SW46th ST SW50th ST SW48th TER SW31 st AVE S W 27th C T S W 25 th AVE SW Mystic ALY 52nd ST SW29 t h P L S WHunter BLVD50th TER SW22nd PL SW 30th AVE SWToucan ALY 24th PL SW 53rd ST SW45th ST SW43rd LN SW44th TER SW41st ST SW30 t h P L S W 25th CT SW51st ST SW43rd ST SW28th AVE SWSunshine BLVD53rd T E R S W 27th PL SW26 th AVE SW 51st TER SW23rd PL SW 52nd TER SW28th PL SW23rd CT SW 49th LN SW54th LN SW41st TER SW27th AVE SW25 t h P L S W 26th PL SW48th ST SW54th ST SW49th ST SW46th TER SW22nd AVE SW 42nd ST SW52nd LN SW54th TER SW42nd TER SW2 9 th A V E S W 32 nd AV E S W C o r a l P a l m s L N Lucerne RD28th CT SW 45th TER SW49th TER SW50th LN SW22nd AVE SW 25th PL SW50th ST SW31 st PL SW Toucan ALY2 8 t h A V E S W 31 st AVE S W 45th ST SW2 6 t h A V E S W 28th AVE SW55th TER SW29 t h P L S W 2 8 th P L S W 2 8 t h A V E S W 52nd TE R S W 25th AVE SW 23rd AVE SW 22nd PL SW 27th PL SW22nd AVE SW 23rd PL SW 26th PL SW54th TER SW54th ST S W 22nd PL SW 42nd TER SW27 th C T S W 26th PL SW 42nd ST SW31 st PL SW 41st ST SW46th ST SW22nd AVE SW 43rd ST SW30 t h P L S W 42nd ST SW53rd ST SW44th TER SW5 3r d S T S W 44th ST SW4 7 t h S T S W31 st PL SW 28th PL SW55th ST SW22nd PL SW 23rd AVE SW 41st TER SW44th TER SW25 th C T S W 30 th AVE SW 2 8 t h A V E S W 50th TER SW22nd PL SW 28th AVE SW30 th AV E S W 4 5 t h S T S W52nd TER SW50th ST SW23rd CT SW 22nd AVE SW Golden Gate PKWYCollier BLVDSanta Barbara BLVDº0 1,000 2,000500 FeetPREPARED BY: GIS/CAD M APPING SECTIONGROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENTFILE: DOW NTHO WN CENTER COM MERCIAL SUBDISTRICT.mxdDATE: 07/2019 SUBJECTSITE DOWNTOWN CENTER COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICTCOLLIER COUNTY, FLO RI DA LEGEND DOWNTOWN CENTERCOMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT D R A F T ADOPTED - OCTOBER 26, 2004(Ord. No. 2004-71)AMENDED - JANUARY 25, 2007(Ord. No. 2007-19)AMENDED - OCTOBER 14, 2008(Ord. No. 2008-59) ADDITION ADDITION ADDITION GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 17 of 21 8.A.4 Packet Pg. 116 Attachment: 2 CCPC Adoption Recommendations GG City sub element (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Golden Gate PKWY55th TER SW55th ST SW44th ST SW23rd AVE SW Hunter BLVD50th TER SWSunset RD Coronado PKWY 47th ST SW24th AVE SW Tropicana BLVD48th ST SWSunshine BLVD45th ST SW47th TER SW51st ST SW31 st PL SW48th TER SW46th TER SW31 st AVE S W 25 th AVE SW 43rd LN SW51st TER SW52nd ST SW46th ST SW45th TER SW30th AVE SWToucan ALY 24th PL SW 53rd ST SW44th TER SW19 th PL SW 50th S T S W 27th C T S W 30 t h P L S W 25th CT SW 28th AVE SW53rd T E R S W 27th PL SWMystic ALY 19th AVE SW 29 t h P L S W 19th CT SW23rd PL SW 52nd TER SW49th ST SW28th PL SW23rd CT SW 49th LN SW54th LN SW26 th AV E S W 4 9th T E R S W27th AVE SW21 st PL SW 25 t h P L S W 26th PL SW22nd PL SW 20th PL SW 54th ST SW52nd LN SW18th PL SW22nd AVE SW 54th TER SW2 9 th A V E S W 21st AVE SW C o r a l P a l m s L N Lucerne RD28th CT SW 18th AVE SW50th LN SW20th AVE SW 43rd TER SW20th CT SW52nd TE R S W 50th ST SW31 st PL SW 52nd TER SW50th ST SW27th PL SW26th PL SW23rd AVE SW 22nd PL SW 25th AVE SW 52nd ST SW44th TER SW2 8 t h A V E S W 4 7 t h S T S W2 8 th P L S W28th AVE SW2 6 t h A V E S W 28th PL SW19th PL SW 49th TER SW19th PL SW 21 st PL SW 45th ST SW49th ST SW51st ST SW21st PL SW22nd PL SW 4 5 t h S T S W30 t h P L S W 21st AVE SW 54th TER SW28th AVE SW21st AVE SW 23rd CT SW 22nd PL SW 22nd AVE SW 19th AVE SW 27 th CT S W 51st TER SW5 3r d S T S W22nd AVE SW 54th S T S W 30 th AVE SW 55th TER SW55th ST SW46th ST SW44th ST SW53rd ST SW50th TER SW2 8 t h A V E S W 2 8 t h A V E S W 20th PL SW 31 st PL SW 31 st AVE S W 44th TER SW50th ST SW19th CT SW 19th A VE SW 26th PL SWToucan ALY23rd PL SW19 th PL SW25 th C T S W 25th PL SWGolden Gate PKWYURBAN MIXED USE ACTIVITY CENTERGOLDEN GATE PARKWAY AND CORONADO PARKWAY COLLIER COUN TY, FLORIDA º0 1,000 2,000500 FeetPREPARED BY: GIS/CAD MAPPING SECTIONGROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENTFILE: RLS-18-CMP-01009 ACTIVITY CENTER MAP.mxdDATE: 07/2019 SUBJECTSITE LEGEND ACTIVITY CENTERBOUNDARIES AMENDED - JANUARY 25, 2007(O rd. No. 2007-1 9) AMENDED - OCTOBER 14, 2008(O rd. No. 2008-5 9) AMENDED - JANUARY 25, 2005(O rd. No. 2005-3 ) ADDITION ADDITION GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 18 of 21 8.A.4 Packet Pg. 117 Attachment: 2 CCPC Adoption Recommendations GG City sub element (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261-CPSP- Collier BLVDGolden Gate PKWY 39th ST SW32 nd AV E S W 44th ST SW55th TER SWTropical WAYSanta Barbara BLVD55th ST SWCoronado PKWY 47th ST SW24th AVE SW Tropicana BLVD47th TER SW31 st PL SWHunter BLVD50th ST SW50th TER SW48th TER SW45th ST SW27th C T S W 52nd ST SW51st ST SW43rd LN SWMystic ALY 53rd ST SW29 t h P L S WSunshine BLVD51st TER SW22nd PL SW 3 0 t h A V E S W Toucan ALY 24th PL SW 41st TER SW48th ST SW41st ST SW30 t h P L S W 25th CT SW 43rd ST SW54th LN SW2 8 t h A V E S W 53rd T E R S W 27th PL SW44th TER SW46th TER SW25 th AVE SW 26 th AVE SW 23rd PL SW 52nd TER SW46th ST SW28th PL SW23rd CT SW 21st AVE SW 23rd AVE SW 27 th AVE SW 49th LN SW31st AVE SW 29 th AVE SW45th TER SW21st PL SW 2 5 t h P L S W 26th PL SWStar Grass LN Sea Grass LN City Gate BLVD NRecreation LN Noahs WAY54th ST SWCopper Leaf LN 52nd LN SW49th ST SWPainted Leaf LN 22nd AVE SW 42nd ST SW54th TER SW42nd TER SWSafe Harbor DR C o r a l P a l m s L N Lucerne RD28th CT SW 2 0 th P L S W 43rd TER SWSunnyland LN German Woods CT 49th TER SW50th LN SW20th CT SW Y o s e m i t e C T 4 5 t h S T S W52nd TER SW44th ST SW2 8 t h P L S W 25 th AVE SW 30 t h P L S W 2 8 t h A V E S W 51st S T S W Toucan ALY23rd CT SW 26th PL SW4 7 t h S T S W23rd PL SW 31 st PL SW 45th ST SW28th AVE SW23rd AVE SW 28th PL SW27th PL SW54th ST S W 29 t h P L S W 42nd TER SW31 st PL SW 25 th C T S W 21st AVE SW 2 6 t h A V E S W53rd ST SW27th AVE SW41st ST SW5 3r d S T S W 21st AVE SW 32 nd AV E S W 31 st AVE S W50th ST SW28th A V E S W54th TER SW26th PL SW 23rd AVE SW23rd AVE SW 50th ST SW42nd ST SW25th AVE SW 29 th A V E S W 3 2 n d A V E S W 52nd LN SW31 st PL SW28th AVE SW42nd ST SW22nd PL SW 30 th AVE SW 22nd AVE SW 43rd ST SW44t h TER SW55th TER SW22nd PL SW 50th ST SW21st PL SW55th ST SW44th TER SW27 th C T S W 30 th AV E S W43rd ST SW52nd TE R S W 25th PL SW46th ST SW41st TER SW2 8 t h A V E S W 31st AVE SW50th TER SW21 st PL SW Collier BLVDGolden Gate PKWYSanta Barbara BLVDº0 1,000 2,000500 FeetPREPARED BY: BETH YANG, AICPGROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENTFILE: Golden Gate Urban Commercial Infill Subdistrict.mxdDATE: 08/2019 GOLDEN GATE CITY URBAN COMMERCIAL INFILL SUBDISTRICTCOLLIER COUNTY, FLO RI DA LEGEND GOLDEN GATE CITYURBAN COMMERCIALINFILL SUBDISTRICT AMENDED - JANUARY 25, 2007(Ord. No. 2007-19)AMENDED - OCTOBER 14, 2008(Ord. No. 2008-59) AMENDED - SEPTEMBER 10, 2003(Ord. No. 2003-44) GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 19 of 21 8.A.4 Packet Pg. 118 Attachment: 2 CCPC Adoption Recommendations GG City sub element (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 20 of 21 8.A.4 Packet Pg. 119 Attachment: 2 CCPC Adoption Recommendations GG City sub element (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261-CPSP- GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 21 of 21 8.A.4 Packet Pg. 120 Attachment: 2 CCPC Adoption Recommendations GG City sub element (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261-CPSP- Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. “Exhibit A” GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN URBAN GOLDEN GATE ESTATES SUB-ELEMENT Prepared by Collier County Zoning Division Prepared for COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Adopted (date) GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 1 of 32 8.A.5 Packet Pg. 121 Attachment: 3 CCPC Adoption Recommendations Urban GGE sub element (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261- Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element ii The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. AMENDMENTS TO COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN: URBAN GOLDEN GATE ESTATES SUB-ELEMENT DATE AMENDED ORDINANCE NO. (date), 2019 2019-(#) GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 2 of 32 8.A.5 Packet Pg. 122 Attachment: 3 CCPC Adoption Recommendations Urban GGE sub element (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261- Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element iii The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page A. Goals, Objectives and Policies 1 B. Land Use Designation Description Section 9 1. ESTATES DESIGNATION 9 A. Estates – Mixed Use District 9 1. Residential Estates Subdistrict 2. Neighborhood Center Subdistrict 3. Conditional Uses Subdistrict 4. Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict B. Estates – Commercial District 15 1. Interchange Activity Center Subdistrict 2. Pine Ridge Road Mixed Use Subdistrict 3. Commercial Western Estates Infill Subdistrict 4. Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict 5. Southbrooke Office Subdistrict C. List Of Maps 19 Urban Golden Gate Estates Future Land Use Map Urban Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict Pine Ridge Road (CR 896) ‒ Interchange Activity Center and Pine Ridge Road Mixed Use Subdistrict Urban Golden Gate Estates Neighborhood Center Collier Boulevard/Pine Ridge Road Center Commercial Western Estates Infill Subdistrict Golden Gate Parkway Interchange Conditional Uses Area Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict Southbrooke Office Subdistrict Conditional Uses Subdistrict: Golden Gate Parkway Special Provisions Special Exceptions to Conditional Use in Golden Gate Estates GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 3 of 32 8.A.5 Packet Pg. 123 Attachment: 3 CCPC Adoption Recommendations Urban GGE sub element (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261- 1 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. A. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES GOAL 1: TO GUIDE LAND USE AND PUBLIC FACILITY DECISION MAKING AND TO BALANCE THE NEED TO PROVIDE BASIC SERVICES WITH NATURAL RESOURCE CONCERNS THROUGH A WELL PLANNED MIX OF COMPATIBLE LAND USES WHICH ENSURE THE HEALTH, SAFETY, WELFARE, AND QUALITY OF LIFE OF THE LOCAL RESIDENTS. OBJECTIVE 1.1: Develop new or revised uses of land consistent with designations outlined on the Urban Golden Gate Estates Future Land Use Map and provisions found in the Land Use Designation Description Section of this Sub-Element. Policy 1.1.1: The Policies under the above Objective shall identify the Future Land Use Designations, Districts, and Subdistricts for the Urban Golden Gate Estates. Policy 1.1.2: The Land Use Designation Description Section of this Element shall provide the standards and permitted uses for Urban Golden Gate Estate Future Land Use Districts and Subdistricts. Policy 1.1.3: The Urban Golden Gate Estate Future Land Use Map and companion Future Land Use Designations, Districts, and Subdistricts shall be binding on all development orders unless otherwise permitted in this Master Plan effective with the adoption of this Master Plan. Policy 1.1.4: The ESTATES Future Land Use Designation shall include Future Land Use Districts and Subdistricts for: A. ESTATES – MIXED USE DISTRICT 1. Residential Estates Subdistrict 2. Neighborhood Center Subdistrict 3. Conditional Uses Subdistrict 4. Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict B. ESTATES – COMMERCIAL DISTRICT 1. Interchange Activity Center Subdistrict 2. Pine Ridge Road Mixed Use Subdistrict 3. Commercial Western Estates Infill Subdistrict 4 Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict 5. Southbrooke Office Subdistrict Policy 1.1.5: Conditional Use requests within Urban Golden Gate Estates shall adhere to the guidelines outlined in the Conditional Uses Subdistrict. Policy 1.1.6: To obtain Conditional Use approval, a super majority vote (minimum of 4 votes) by the Board of Zoning Appeals shall be required. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 4 of 32 8.A.5 Packet Pg. 124 Attachment: 3 CCPC Adoption Recommendations Urban GGE sub element (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261- 2 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. Policy 1.1.7: No development orders shall be issued inconsistent with the Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub- Element with the exception of those unimproved properties granted a positive determination through the Zoning Re-evaluation Program and identified on the Future Land Use Map Series as properties consistent by Policy and those development orders issued pursuant to conditional uses and rezones approved based on the County-Wide Future Land Use Element (adopted January 10, 1989, Ordinance 89-05) which was in effect at the time of approval. Any subsequent development orders shall also be reviewed for consistency with the Growth Management Plan based on the County-Wide Future Land Use Element. Policy 1.1.8: The sites containing existing public educational plants and ancillary plants, and the undeveloped sites owned by the Collier County School Board for future public educational plants and ancillary plants, within the GGAMP area, are depicted on the Future Land Use Map Series in the countywide FLUE and on the Public School Facilities Element Map Series, and referenced in FLUE Policy 5.14 and Intergovernmental Coordination Element Policy 1.2.6. All of these sites are subject to the general Interlocal Agreement, adopted on May 15, 2003 by the Collier County School Board and on May 27, 2003 by the Board of County Commissioners, and as subsequently amended and restated, with an effective date of December 2008, and subject to the implementing land development regulations to be adopted. OBJECTIVE 1.2: Ensure public facilities are provided at an acceptable level of service. Policy 1.2.1: Requests for new uses of land shall be subject to level of service standards and concurrency requirements for public facilities as outlined in the Capital Improvement Element of the Growth Management Plan. OBJECTIVE 1.3: Protect and preserve the valuable natural resources within the Urban Golden Gate Estates. Policy 1.3.1: The County shall protect and preserve natural resources within the Urban Golden Gate Estates in accordance with the Objectives and Policies contained within Goals 6 and 7 of the Collier County Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME). Policy 1.3.2: As provided for in CCME Policy 6.1.1, the subdivision of tracts up to 13 acres in size and designated Residential Estates Subdistrict shall not trigger preserve requirements. Policy 1.3.3: Collier County shall coordinate its planning and permitting activities within the Urban Golden Gate Estates with all other applicable environmental planning, permitting and regulatory agencies to ensure that all Federal, State and local natural resource protection regulations are being enforced. OBJECTIVE 1.4: Provide a living environment within the Urban Golden Gate Estates, which is aesthetically acceptable and protects the quality of life. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 5 of 32 8.A.5 Packet Pg. 125 Attachment: 3 CCPC Adoption Recommendations Urban GGE sub element (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261- 3 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. Policy 1.4.1: Collier County shall provide a living environment that is aesthetically acceptable and protects the quality of life through the enforcement of applicable codes and laws. Policy 1.4.2: The County's Code Enforcement Board shall strictly enforce the Land Development Code and other applicable codes and laws to control the illegal storage of machinery, vehicles and junk, and the illegal operation of commercial activities within the Urban Golden Gate Estates. GOAL 2: TO PROVIDE FOR LIMITED COMMERCIAL SERVICES AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR PURPOSES OF SERVING THE RURAL NEEDS OF GOLDEN GATE ESTATES RESIDENTS, SHORTENING VEHICULAR TRIPS, AND PRESERVING RURAL CHARACTER. OBJECTIVE 2.1: Meet the locational and rural design criteria contained within the Estates Designation, Estates- Mixed Use District, Neighborhood Center Subdistrict and Conditional Use Subdistrict of this Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element, of the Collier County Growth Management Plan when considering the placement and designation of Neighborhood Centers and Conditional Uses within Urban Golden Gate Estates. Policy 2.1.1: Neighborhood Centers within Urban Golden Gate Estates shall be subject to the locational and rural design criteria established within the Estates Designation, Estates – Mixed Use District, Neighborhood Center Subdistrict of this Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element, of the Collier County Growth Management Plan. Policy 2.1.2: Conditional Uses within Urban Golden Gate Estates shall be subject to locational and dimensional criteria established within the Conditional Use Subdistrict in the Land Use Designation Description section of this Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element. GOAL 3: TO PRESERVE THE AREA’S RURAL CHARACTER, AS DEFINED BY LARGE WOODED LOTS, THE KEEPING OF LIVESTOCK, THE ABILITY TO GROW CROPS, WILDLIFE ACTIVITY, ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP, LOW-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, AND LIMITATIONS ON COMMERCIAL AND CONDITIONAL USES. OBJECTIVE 3.1: Balance the provision of public infrastructure with the need to preserve the rural character of Urban Golden Gate Estates. Policy 3.1.1: Future road and bridge improvements in Urban Golden Gate Estates shall not only provide for safety and reasonable mobility, but shall also contribute to the rural character of the area. Transportation improvements shall be designed in context with their setting. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 6 of 32 8.A.5 Packet Pg. 126 Attachment: 3 CCPC Adoption Recommendations Urban GGE sub element (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261- 4 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. Policy 3.1.2 The County shall initiate architectural standard requirements in the Land Development Code within two years of adoption that apply to commercial, conditional use and essential services facilities, reflecting the rural character of the Estates area and providing coherence and are a identity. Policy 3.1.3: The County Manager or designee shall create a public network of greenway corridors within Urban Golden Gate Estates that interconnects public lands and permanently protected green space. The greenway network shall consist of interconnected trails and paths that allow people to move about the Estates area by means other than motorized vehicles. All greenways shall be constructed within or abutting existing or future public easements or rights-of-way. In creating the greenway network, the County shall not employ eminent domain proceedings. Policy 3.1.4: Recognizing the residential nature of the land uses surrounding the I-75 interchange at Golden Gate Parkway, as well as the restrictions on conditional uses of the Conditional Uses Subdistrict of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan, there shall be no further commercial zoning for properties abutting Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. No new commercial uses shall be permitted on properties abutting streets accessing Golden Gate Parkway within the above-defined segment. This policy shall not apply to that existing portion of the Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict, which is located at the northwest corner of the intersection of Golden Gate Parkway and Santa Barbara Boulevard. OBJECTIVE 3.2: Provide for the protection of the rural character of Urban Golden Gate Estates. Policy 3.2.1: Rural character protection provisions shall provide for the preservation of such rural amenities as, but not limited to, wooded lots, the keeping of livestock, the ability to grow crops, wildlife activity, and low-density residential development. Policy 3.2.2: The growing of food crops and/or the keeping of livestock on properties within Urban Golden Gate Estates shall be permitted, provided that such activities are conducted according to the Land Development Code. Policy 3.2.3: Rural character shall be further protected by resisting site-specific Master Plan changes that are out of scale or character with the rural quality of Urban Golden Gate Estates. Policy 3.2.4: Recognizing the low density in Urban Golden Gate Estates, the County will initiate a review of written notification requirements in the Land Development Code and the Administrative Code related to land use petitions in Golden Gate Estates, within 1 year of adoption, and consider increasing the specified distance, with particular attention to properties located on dead-end streets. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 7 of 32 8.A.5 Packet Pg. 127 Attachment: 3 CCPC Adoption Recommendations Urban GGE sub element (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261- 5 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. Policy 3.2.5: Consistent with public safety requirements and best practices for rural areas, outdoor lighting within Urban Golden Gate Estates shall be placed, constructed and maintained in such manner as to prevent or reduce light pollution. In implementing this Policy, the County shall: a. Adhere to the “Collier County Lighting Standards” (County Manager’s Office Standards dated January 6, 2017) as amended, with respect to new and existing County owned or maintained sites and structures. b. Continue to coordinate with FPL and FDOT to improve roadway and security lighting consistent with International Dark Skies Association best practices. c. Consider changes to the Land Development Code and other applicable ordinances to create voluntary or mandatory outdoor lighting standards for commercial, residential or other uses consistent with International Dark Skies Association best practices, and determine the extent such standards apply to new or existing development. OBJECTIVE 3.3: Encourage the preservation of natural resources in Urban Golden Gate Estates, including protection and enhancement of its watershed. Policy 3.3.1: The Land Development Code shall continue to allow and further encourage the preservation of native vegetation and wildlife indigenous to the Urban Golden Gate Estates. Policy 3.3.2: The County shall continue to pursue the Watershed Management Plan initiatives in Urban Golden Gate Estates as financial and staff resources become available. Policy 3.3.3: The County shall encourage the combination of parcels smaller than 2.25 acres with other parcels in order to preserve and enhance low-density environmental advantages. Within two years of adoption of this policy, County staff will present recommendations for property owner incentives to the Board of County Commissioners. Policy 3.3.4: The County will evaluate the use of transferable development rights for the purpose of securing the preservation of wetland or other environmentally significant land within Urban Golden Gate Estates, in a timeframe directed by the Board. Policy 3.3.5: Within two years of adoption, the County, in coordination with the Floodplain Management Committee, will initiate a study on the feasibility of dispersed water management (DWM) for single family Estates lots, and determine the extent to which it will rely on voluntary, incentive or mandatory provisions and whether provisions will apply to developed and undeveloped Estates parcels. Policy 3.3.6: The County will continue to identify and implement educational opportunities related to water resources for parcel owners, homeowners, builders, real estate professionals and the public to aid in understanding and addressing site-specific financial and environmental impacts as well as area-wide impacts to water resources. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 8 of 32 8.A.5 Packet Pg. 128 Attachment: 3 CCPC Adoption Recommendations Urban GGE sub element (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261- 6 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. Policy 3.3.7: The County will periodically coordinate with the South Florida Water Management District to review the Level of Service Standards for primary water management canals within the County and their effect on Urban Golden Gate Estates. Policy 3.3.8: The County shall continue to pursue a best management practices approach to making septage treatment available to residents and businesses within Urban Golden Gate Estates, as a component of bio-solid processing, either directly, through a private entity, or through a public- private partnership. GOAL 4: TO PROVIDE FOR A SAFE AND EFFICIENT COUNTY AND LOCAL ROADWAY NETWORK, WHILE AT THE SAME TIME SEEKING TO PRESERVE THE RURAL CHARACTER OF GOLDEN GATE ESTATES IN FUTURE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE GOLDEN GATE AREA. OBJECTIVE 4.1: Increase linkages within the local road system for the purposes of limiting traffic on arterials and major collectors within Urban Golden Gate Estates, shortening vehicular trips, and increasing overall road system capacity. Policy 4.1.1: The County shall continue to explore alternative financing methods to facilitate both east - west and north-south bridging of canals within Urban Golden Gate Estates. Policy 4.1.2: The County shall update the 2008 Bridge Study to prioritize bridge construction based on emergency response times, evacuation times, cost components, anticipated development patterns and other considerations and shall report its recommendations to the Board of County Commissioners within two years of adoption of this policy. Policy 4.1.3: Planning and right-of-way acquisition for bridges within the Urban Golden Gate Estates local road system shall include consideration of the costs and benefits of including sidewalks and bike lanes. Policy 4.1.4: Sidewalks and bike lanes shall provide access to government facilities, schools, commercial areas and the planned Metropolitan Planning Organization greenway network. Policy 4.1.5: Planning, funding and implementation of potential greenway trails shall be coordinated between the County and the Metropolitan Planning Organization. GOAL 5: TO PROTECT THE LIVES AND PROPERTY OF THE RESIDENTS OF THE URBAN GOLDEN GATE AREA, AS WELL AS THE HEALTH OF THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT, THROUGH THE PROVISION OF EMERGENCY SERVICES THAT PREPARE FOR, MITIGATE, AND RESPOND TO, NATURAL AND MANMADE DISASTERS. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 9 of 32 8.A.5 Packet Pg. 129 Attachment: 3 CCPC Adoption Recommendations Urban GGE sub element (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261- 7 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. OBJECTIVE 5.1: Coordinate with local emergency services officials in engineering and constructing road improvements within Urban Golden Gate Estates to ensure that the access needs of fire department, police and emergency management personnel and vehicles are met. Policy 5.1.1: Collier County shall hold at least one annual public meeting with Urban Golden Gate Estates emergency services providers and the local civic association in order to ensure that emergency needs are addressed during the acquisition of right-of-way for design and construction of road improvements. Policy 5.1.2: Collier County shall continue to coordinate with Golden Gate Area emergency services providers to prioritize necessary road improvements related to emergency evacuation needs. OBJECTIVE 5.2: Ensure that the needs of all applicable emergency services providers are included and coordinated in the overall public project design for capital improvement projects within the Urban Golden Gate Estates. Policy 5.2.1: Preparation of Collier County’s annual Schedule of Capital Improvements for projects within the Urban Golden Gate Estates shall be coordinated with the independent Fire Districts that serve Golden Gate Estates (Fire Districts), public and private utilities, Emergency Medical Services Department and the Collier County Sheriff’s Department to ensure that public project designs are consistent with the needs of these agencies. Policy 5.2.2: Districts, Collier County Emergency Medical Services Department and the Collier County Sheriff’s Department will receive copies of pre-construction plans for capital improvement projects in the Golden Gate Area and will be invited to review and comment on plans for the public projects. OBJECTIVE 5.3: Maintain and implement public information programs through the Collier County Bureau of Emergency Services, Collier County Sheriff ’s Department, Fire Districts, and other appropriate agencies, to inform residents and visitors of the Greater Golden Gate Area regarding the means to prevent, prepare for, and cope with, man-made and natural disasters. Policy 5.3.1: The Fire Districts that serve the Golden Gate area, and other appropriate agencies, shall embark on an education program to assist residents in knowing and understanding the value and need for prescribed burning on public lands in high risk fire areas. Policy 5.3.2: The Fire Districts, and Collier County Bureau of Emergency Services shall actively promote the Firewise Communities Program through public education in Urban Golden Gate Estates. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 10 of 32 8.A.5 Packet Pg. 130 Attachment: 3 CCPC Adoption Recommendations Urban GGE sub element (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261- 8 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. Policy 5.3.3: Fire Districts, and the Collier County Bureau of Emergency Services shall hold one or more annual “open house” presentations in the Golden Gate area emphasizing issues related to wildfires, flooding, emergency access and general emergency management. OBJECTIVE 5.4: Pursue appropriate planning and mitigation measures to address the threat of wildfires in Urban Golden Gate Estates. Policy 5.4.1: Collier County shall evaluate the Land Development Code for Urban Golden Gate Estates requirements that are found to be inconsistent with acceptable fire prevention standards. This evaluation process shall be coordinated with the Fire Districts, and the Collier County Bureau of Emergency Services. Policy 5.4.2: The County shall explore annually, options for funding wildfire prevention measures undertaken by the County, Florida Forest Service and/or independent Fire Districts, including but not limited to Urban Golden Gate Estates Municipal Services Taxing Units (MSTU) revenue, grant funding and general fund revenue. Policy 5.4.3: The County shall review annually and update as necessary, all interlocal agreements and mutual aid agreements to assure coordination of legal, procedural and educational components of wildfire prevention. Policy 5.4.4: County-owned property within Urban Golden Gate Estates shall be subject to an active, on-going management plan to reduce the damage caused by wildfires originating from County-owned properties. [REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 11 of 32 8.A.5 Packet Pg. 131 Attachment: 3 CCPC Adoption Recommendations Urban GGE sub element (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261- 9 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. B. LAND USE DESIGNATION DESCRIPTION SECTION The following section describes the three land use designations shown on the Urban Golden Gate Estates Future Land Use Map. These designations generally indicate the types of land uses for which zoning may be requested. However, these land use designations do not guarantee that a zoning request will be approved. Requests may be denied by the Board of County Commissioners based on criteria in the Land Development Code or in special studies completed for the County. 1. ESTATES DESIGNATION This designation is characterized by low density semi-rural residential lots with limited opportunities for other land uses. Typical lots are 2.25 acres in size. However, there are some legal non-conforming lots as small as 1.14 acres. Residential density is limited to a maximum of one unit per 2.25 gross acres, or one unit per legal non-conforming lot of record, exclusive of guesthouses. Multiple family dwelling units, duplexes, and other structures containing two or more principal dwellings, are prohibited in all Districts and Subdistricts in this Designation. Generally, the Estates Designation also accommodates future non-residential uses, including: a. Conditional uses and essential services as defined in the Land Development Code, except as prohibited in the Neighborhood Center Subdistrict. Also, refer to the Conditional Uses Subdistrict. b. Parks, open space and recreational uses. c. Group Housing shall be permitted subject to the definitions and regulations as outlined in the Collier County Land Development Code (Ordinance No. 04-41, as amended) and consistent with locational requirements in Florida Statutes (Chapter 419.001 F.S.). d. Schools and school facilities in the Estates Designation north of I-75, and where feasible and mutually acceptable, co-locate schools with other public facilities, such as parks, libraries and community centers to the extent possible. Group Housing includes the following type facilities: aa. Family Care Facility if occupied by not more than six (6) persons shall be permitted in residential areas. bb. Group Care Facility, cc. Care Units, dd. Adult Congregate Living Facilities, and ee. Nursing Homes. All of the above uses shall be consistent with all of the Goals, Objectives and Policies of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan. A. Estates ‒ Mixed-Use District 1. Residential Estates Subdistrict Single-family residential development is allowed within this Subdistrict at a maximum density of one unit per 2.25 gross acres, or one unit per legal non-conforming lot of record, exclusive of guesthouses. 2. Neighborhood Center Subdistrict Recognizing the need to provide basic goods, services and amenities to Estates residents, one Neighborhood Center has been designated on the Urban Golden Gate Estates Future Land Use Map. The Neighborhood Center designation does not guarantee that commercial GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 12 of 32 8.A.5 Packet Pg. 132 Attachment: 3 CCPC Adoption Recommendations Urban GGE sub element (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261- 10 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. zoning will be granted. The designation only provides the opportunity to request commercial zoning. a. The Collier County Land Development Code shall be amended to provide rural design criteria to regulate all new commercial development within Neighborhood Centers. b. Locations Neighborhood Centers are located along major roadways and are distributed within Golden Gate Estates according to commercial demand estimates. (See Urban Golden Gate Estates Neighborhood Center Map). The centers are designed to concentrate all new commercial zoning, and conditional uses, as allowed in the Estates Zoning District, in locations where traffic impacts can be readily accommodated and to avoid strip and disorganized patterns of commercial and conditional use development. One Neighborhood Center is established as follows: i. Collier Boulevard and Pine Ridge Road Center. The center at Collier Boulevard and Pine Ridge Road is located on both sides of the intersection. Tracts 109-114, Unit 26, Golden Gate Estates are included in this center as eligible for commercial development. (See Collier Boulevard/Pine Ridge Road Center Map). The E1/2 of Tract 107, Unit 26 is also included within this center but is only to be used for buffer, water management and open space. c. Criteria for land uses at the center is as follows: i. Commercial uses shall be limited to intermediate commercial so as to provide for a wider variety of goods and services in areas that have a higher degree of automobile traffic. These uses shall be similar to C-1, C-2, or C-3 zoning districts outlined in the Collier County Land Development Code (Ordinance No. 04-41, as amended), except as prohibited below. ii. The Neighborhood Center located at the intersection of Pine Ridge Road and Collier Boulevard may be developed at 100% commercial and must provide internal circulation. Any rezoning is encouraged to be in the form of a PUD. This Neighborhood Center may also be utilized for single-family residential or conditional uses allowed in the Estates zoning district such as churches, social or fraternal organizations, childcare centers, schools, and group care facilities. iii. A single project shall utilize no more than 50% of the total allowed commercial acreage. This percentage may be increased at the discretion of the Board of County Commissioners. iv. The project shall make provisions for shared parking arrangements with adjoining developments. v. Access points shall be limited to one per 180 feet commencing from the right- of -way of the major intersecting streets of the Neighborhood Center. A maximum of three curb cuts per quadrant shall be allowed. vi. Driveways and curb cuts shall be consolidated with adjoining developments, whenever possible. vii. Driveways accessing parcels on opposite sides of the roadway shall be in direct alignment, except when the roadway median between the two parcels has no opening. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 13 of 32 8.A.5 Packet Pg. 133 Attachment: 3 CCPC Adoption Recommendations Urban GGE sub element (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261- 11 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. viii. Projects shall provide a 25-foot wide landscape buffer abutting the external right-of-way. This buffer shall contain two staggered rows of trees that shall be spaced no more than 30 feet on center, and a double row hedge at least 24 inches in height at time of planting and attaining a minimum of three feet height within one year. A minimum of 50% of the 25-foot wide buffer area shall be comprised of a meandering bed of shrubs and ground covers other than grass. Existing native trees must be retained within this 25-foot wide buffer area to aid in achieving this buffer requirement; other existing native vegetation shall be retained, where possible, to aid in achieving this buffer requirement. Water retention/detention areas shall be allowed in this buffer area if left in natural state, and drainage conveyance through the buffer area shall be allowed if necessary to reach an external outfall. a. For Tract 114, Golden Gate Estates, Unit 26, access shall be restricted to 11th Avenue S.W. Also, vehicular interconnection shall be provided to the adjacent property(s) in the Pine Ridge Road/Collier Boulevard Neighborhood Center. b. All buildings shall have tile roofs, ‘Old Style Florida’ metal roofs, or decorative parapet walls above the roofline. The buildings shall be finished in light, subdued colors, except for decorative trim. ix. All lighting facilities shall be architecturally–designed, and shall be limited to a height of twenty-five (25) feet. Such lighting facilities shall be shielded from neighboring residential land uses and consistent with Policy 5.2.4. x. Commercial uses shall encourage pedestrian traffic through placement of sidewalks, pedestrian walkways, and marked crosswalks within parking areas. Adjacent projects shall coordinate placement of sidewalks so that a continuous pathway through the Neighborhood Center is created. xi. All buildings and projects within any single specific quadrant of the Subdistrict shall utilize a common architectural theme. This theme shall be applicable to both building design and signage. xii. Fences or walls may be constructed on the commercial side of the required landscape buffer between adjacent commercial and residential uses. If constructed, such fences or walls shall not exceed five (5) feet in height. Walls shall be constructed of brick or stone. Fences shall be of wood or concrete post or rail types, and shall be of open design (not covered by slats, boards or wire). xiii. Projects directly abutting residential property (property zoned E-Estates and without an approved conditional use) shall provide, at a minimum, a seventy-five (75) feet wide buffer in which no parking uses are permitted. Twenty-five (25) feet of the width of the buffer along the developed area shall be a landscape buffer. A minimum of fifty (50) feet of the buffer width shall consist of retained native vegetation and must be consistent with subsection 3.05.07H. of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC). The native vegetation retention area may consist of a perimeter berm and be used for water management detention. Any newly constructed berm shall be revegetated to meet subsection 3.05.07H. of the LDC (native vegetation replanting requirements). Additionally, in order to be considered GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 14 of 32 8.A.5 Packet Pg. 134 Attachment: 3 CCPC Adoption Recommendations Urban GGE sub element (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261- 12 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. for approval, use of the native vegetation retention area for water management purposes shall meet the following criteria: a. There shall be no adverse impacts to the native vegetation being retained. The additional water directed to this area shall not increase the annual hydro-period unless it is proven that such would have no adverse impact to the existing vegetation. b. If the project requires permitting by the South Florida Water Management District, the project shall provide a letter or official document from the District indicating that the native vegetation within the retention area will not have to be removed to comply with water management requirements. If the District cannot or will not supply such a letter, then the native vegetation retention area shall not be used for water management. c. If the project is reviewed by Collier County, the County engineer shall provide evidence that no removal of native vegetation is necessary to facilitate the necessary storage of water in the water management area. xiv. Projects within the Neighborhood Center Subdistrict that are submitted as PUDs shall provide a functional public open-space component. Such public open-space shall be developed as green space within a pedestrian-accessible courtyard, as per Section 4.06.03B. of the Collier County Land Development Code, as in effect at the time of P.U.D. approval. xv. The following principal permitted uses are prohibited within Neighborhood Centers: a. Drinking Places (5813) and Liquor Stores (5921) b. Mail Order Houses (5961) c. Merchandizing Machine Operators (5962) d. Power Laundries (7211) e. Crematories (7261) (Does not include non-crematory Funeral Parlors) f. Radio, TV Representatives (7313) and Direct Mail Advertising Services (7331) g. NEC Recreational Shooting Ranges, Waterslides, etc. (7999) h. General Hospitals (8062), Psychiatric Hospitals (8063), and Specialty Hospitals (8069) i. Elementary and Secondary Schools (8211), Colleges (8221), Junior Colleges (8222) j. Libraries (8231) k. Correctional Institutions (9223) l. Waste Management (9511) m. Homeless Shelters and Soup Kitchens. 3. Conditional Uses Subdistrict Various types of conditional uses are permitted in the Estates zoning district within the Urban Golden Gate Estates area. In order to control the location and spacing of new conditional uses, one of the following four sets of criteria shall be met: a. Essential Services Conditional Use Provisions: GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 15 of 32 8.A.5 Packet Pg. 135 Attachment: 3 CCPC Adoption Recommendations Urban GGE sub element (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261- 13 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. Those Essential Services Conditional Uses, as identified within Section 2.01.03 G. of the Collier County Land Development Code, may be allowed anywhere within the Estates Zoning District, except as prohibited in certain Neighborhood Centers, and are described as: 1. electric or gas generating plants, 2. effluent tanks, 3. major re-pump stations, 4. sewage treatment plants, including percolation ponds, 5. hospitals and hospices, 6. water aeration or treatment plants, 7. governmental facilities (except for those Permitted Uses identified in Section 2.01.03 of the Land Development Code), 8. public water supply acquisition, withdrawal, or extraction facilities, and 9. public safety service facilities, and other similar facilities. b. Golden Gate Parkway and Collier Boulevard Special Provisions: 1. Recognizing the existing residential nature of the land uses surrounding the I- 75 interchange at Golden Gate Parkway, there shall be no further conditional uses for properties abutting Golden Gate Parkway, between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard, except: as permitted within the Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict and the Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict; as provided in subparagraphs 3. and 5. below; for the properties identified as Unit 30 Tracts 113-115 and the N 150’ of tract 116 that have existing Conditional Uses; and, for essential services, as described in paragraph a., above. 2. Further, no properties abutting streets accessing Golden Gate Parkway, between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard, shall be approved for conditional uses except: as permitted within the Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict; as provided in subparagraph 3. below; and, for essential services, as described in paragraph a. above. 3. In consideration of the improvements associated with the interchange at Interstate 75 and Golden Gate Parkway, the existing conditional use (church and related facilities) located at the southeast corner of Golden Gate Parkway and 66th Street S.W. may be expanded in acreage and intensity along the south side of Golden Gate Parkway to the east of 66th Street S.W., but the total project area shall not exceed approximately 9.22 acres (see Golden Gate Parkway Interchange Conditional Uses Area Map). 4. The parcel located immediately south of the Commercial Western Estates Infill Subdistrict, on the west side of Collier Boulevard, and at the southwest quadrant of the intersection of Vanderbilt Beach Road and Collier Boulevard, shall be eligible for a transitional conditional use designation. 5. Conditional use for expansion of the existing educational and charitable social organization (Naples Bridge Center) is allowed on the east 150 feet of Tract 75 and the west 150 feet of Tract 82, Unit 30, Golden Gate Estates. The maximum building area permitted on the two parcels shall be limited to 15,000 square feet. Use of Tract 82 shall be limited to parking, water management and open space uses. See Conditional Uses Subdistrict Golden Gate Parkway Special Provisions map. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 16 of 32 8.A.5 Packet Pg. 136 Attachment: 3 CCPC Adoption Recommendations Urban GGE sub element (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261- 14 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. 6. The property located on Collier Boulevard identified as Golden Gate Estates Unit 1, north 150 feet of TR 114, less right-of-way, shall be eligible for Conditional Use. c. Neighborhood Center Transitional Conditional Use Provisions: Conditional uses shall be allowed immediately adjacent to designated Neighborhood Centers subject to the following criteria: 1. Properties eligible for conditional uses shall abut the arterial or collector road serving the Neighborhood Center, 2. Such uses shall be limited to transitional conditional uses that are compatible with both residential and commercial such as neighborhood churches, social or fraternal organizations, childcare centers, schools, and group care facilities, 3. All conditional uses shall make provisions for shared parking arrangements with adjoining developments whenever possible, 4. Conditional uses abutting Estates zoned property shall provide, at a minimum, a 75-foot buffer of native vegetation in which no parking or water management uses are permitted, 5. Conditional uses adjoining the commercial uses within Neighborhood Centers shall, whenever possible, share parking areas, access and curb cuts with the adjoining commercial use, in order to facilitate traffic movement. d. Transitional Conditional Uses: Conditional uses may be granted in Transitional Areas. A Transitional Area is defined as an area located between existing non-residential and residential areas. The purpose of this provision is to allow conditional uses in areas that are adjacent to existing non-residential uses and are therefore generally not appropriate for residential use. The conditional use will act as a buffer between non-residential and residential areas. The following criteria shall apply for Transitional Conditional Use requests: 1. Site shall be directly adjacent to a non-residential use (zoned or developed); 2. Site shall be 2.25 acres, or more, in size or be at least 150 feet in width and shall not exceed 5 acres; 3. Site abutting Estates zoned property without an approved conditional use shall provide, at a minimum, a 75-foot buffer of native vegetation in which no parking or water management uses are permitted; 4. Site shall not be adjacent to a church or other place of worship, school, social or fraternal organization, child care center, convalescent home, hospice, rest home, home for the aged, adult foster home, children's home, rehabilitation centers; 5. Site shall not be adjacent to parks or open space and recreational uses; and 6. Site shall not be adjacent to permitted (by right) Essential Service uses, as identified in Section 2.01.03 of the Land Development Code, except may be located adjacent to libraries and museums. and electrical substations. e. Special Exceptions to Conditional Use Locational Criteria: 1. Temporary use (TU) permits for model homes, as defined in the Collier County Land Development Code, may be allowed anywhere within the Estates-Mixed Use District. Conditional use permits for the purpose of extending the time period for use of the structure as a model home shall be required, and shall be subject to the provisions of Section 5.04.04B. and C. of the Collier County Land Development GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 17 of 32 8.A.5 Packet Pg. 137 Attachment: 3 CCPC Adoption Recommendations Urban GGE sub element (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261- 15 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. Code, Ordinance No. 04-41, as amended. Such conditional uses shall not be subject to the locational criteria of the Conditional Uses Subdistrict, and may be allowed anywhere within the Estates-Mixed Use District. 2. Conditional Use permits for excavation, as provided for in the Estates zoning district, are not subject to the locational criteria for Conditional Uses and may be allowed anywhere within the Estates-Mixed Use District. 3. Conditional Use for a church or place of worship, as provided for in the Estates zoning district, is allowed on Tract 22, Golden Gate Estates, Unit 97 (See Special Exception to Conditional Use Location Criteria Map). 4. Conditional Use for a church or place of worship as allowed in the Estates Zoning District is allowed on the north 180 feet of Tract 107, Unit 30, Golden Gate Estates. Church-related day care use shall not be allowed. Development shall be limited to a maximum of 12,000 square feet of floor area (See Special Exception to Conditional Use Location Criteria Map). 5. Conditional Use for a cellular tower is allowed in the Estates Zoning District only on parcels no smaller than 2.25 acres and adjacent to a roadway classified within the Transportation Element as a Collector or Arterial. 4. Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict This Subdistrict is specific to Tracts 43, 50, 59, and 66 of Golden Gate Estates Unit 30, and includes four parcels of land containing approximately 16.3 acres, located on the north side of Golden Gate Parkway, east of I-75 and west of Santa Barbara Boulevard. The intent of the Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict is to provide for the continued operation of existing uses, and the development and redevelopment of institutional and related uses. The Subdistrict is intended to be compatible with the neighboring residential uses and will utilize well-planned access points to ensure safe and convenient access onto Golden Gate Parkway. The following institutional uses are permitted through the conditional use process within the Subdistrict: a. Neighborhood churches and other places of worship. b. Group care facilities (Categories I and II) c. Nursing homes and assisted living facilities associated with the David Lawrence Center. d. Essential services as set forth in Section 2.01.03 of the Collier County Land Development Code, Ordinance No. 04-41, as amended. e. Private schools associated with the David Lawrence Center or Parkway Community Church of God, for Tracts 43, 50 and 59 only. f. Day care centers associated with the David Lawrence Center or Parkway Community Church of God. g. Medical offices associated with the David Lawrence Center. B. Estates – Commercial District 1. Interchange Activity Center Subdistrict On the fringes of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan boundaries, there are several parcels that are located within the Interchange Activity Center #10 at I-75 and Pine Ridge Road as GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 18 of 32 8.A.5 Packet Pg. 138 Attachment: 3 CCPC Adoption Recommendations Urban GGE sub element (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261- 16 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. detailed in the County-wide Future Land Use Element (FLUE). Parcels within this Activity Center are subject to the County-wide FLUE and not this Master Plan. See Activity Center and Pine Ridge Road Mixed Use Subdistrict Map for a detailed map of this Activity Center. 2. Pine Ridge Road Mixed Use Subdistrict This Subdistrict is adjacent to the northwest quadrant of Interchange Activity Center #10, west of the Naples Gateway PUD, and comprises 16.23 acres. It consists of Tracts 1, 12, 13 and 28 of Golden Gate Estates, Unit 35, as recorded in Plat Book 7, Page 85, of the Public Records of Collier County. The intent of the Pine Ridge Road Mixed Use Subdistrict is to allow for a mix of both retail and office uses to provide for shopping and personal services for the surrounding residential areas within a convenient travel distance and to provide commercial services appropriately located along a collector roadway, Livingston Road. Well-planned access points will be used to improve current and future traffic flows in the area. Within this Subdistrict no more than 35,000 square feet of office-related uses on +3.2 acres are permitted within the eastern portion of this property, which includes a portion of Tract 28 and a portion of Tract 13. A maximum of 80,000 square feet of gross leasable retail or office area, as allowed in the Commercial Intermediate District (C-3) of the Collier County Land Development Code in effect as of the effective date of the adoption of this Subdistrict [Ordinance No. 03-01, adopted January 16, 2003], are permitted within the western 10.52 acres of this property. The C-3 uses are not an entitlement. Such uses will be further evaluated at the time of rezoning application to insure appropriateness in relationship to surrounding properties. A rezoning of the western 10.52 acres is encouraged to be in the form of a Planned Unit Development. Regulations for water management, uniform landscaping, signage, screening and buffering will be included in the rezoning ordinance to ensure compatibility with nearby residential areas, and shall be subject to the following additional criteria: a. There shall be no access onto Livingston Woods Lane. b. Shared access shall be encouraged. c. Building heights shall not exceed 35 feet. d. There shall be a minimum setback area of 75 feet along the northern property line. e. Driveway access, parking, and water management facilities may be allowed within the 75-foot setback area along the northern property line, but none of these uses shall be located closer than 30 feet to this line. f. No freestanding automobile parking lots, homeless shelters or soup kitchens shall be permitted. g. Within the eastern portion of Tract 28, 2.2 acres, more or less, shall be preserved as wetlands and no development shall occur within that area. h. Within the western 10.52 acres, a loop road shall be constructed through the property to provide access from Pine Ridge Road to Livingston Road and to reduce traffic at the intersection. See Activity Center and Pine Ridge Road Mixed Use Subdistrict Map for a detailed map of this Subdistrict. 3. Commercial Western Estates Infill Subdistrict The purpose of the Subdistrict is to allow for limited commercial and/or medical office uses, in recognition of the subject property's unsuitability for single-family residential development. Limited commercial and/or medical uses at this location will also assist in reducing the distance and the number of vehicular trips generated within the general area through trip GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 19 of 32 8.A.5 Packet Pg. 139 Attachment: 3 CCPC Adoption Recommendations Urban GGE sub element (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261- 17 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. capture. The standards contained in this Subdistrict are designed to ensure that uses within the Subdistrict will be compatible with nearby residential development. A loop road shall be required through the property to connect Vanderbilt Beach Road with Collier Boulevard will also serve to lessen vehicular trips through the intersection. a. Size and Location: The Subdistrict includes a 6.23-acre parcel, located at the southwest corner of Vanderbilt Beach Road and Collier Boulevard (see Commercial Western Estates Infill Subdistrict Map). The parcel is identified as Tract 105, Unit 2, Golden Gate Estates. b. Permitted Uses and Development Intensity: Within the subject property, 3.93 acres of office/medical use is permitted with a maximum of forty-one thousand four hundred and ninety (41,490) square feet of gross leaseable area permitted or approximately 6,660 square feet per gross acre. The balance of the area, comprising +2.3 acres, shall remain in open space. Uses allowed within this Subdistrict shall be those office uses, medical uses, and financial institutions permitted whether by right or by conditional use, within the C-1 zoning district, as contained in the Collier County Land Development Code, Ordinance 91-102, as of the effective date of the adoption of this Subdistrict [Ordinance No. 03-01, adopted January 16, 2003]. c. Development Standards: 1. All permitted uses within this Subdistrict shall be encouraged to be submitted in the form of a Planned Unit Development (P.U.D.) for the subject property with special attention to be provided for shared access, water management, uniform landscaping, signage, screening and buffering to ensure compatibility with nearby residential areas. 2. Building height shall be limited to two stories, with a maximum height of thirty (30) feet, except that portions of the property within one hundred (100) feet of the buffer described in item #3, below, shall be limited to one story with a maximum height of twenty-five (25) feet. 3. There shall be a setback of seventy-five (75) feet in width abutting Estates- zoned property. Where feasible, existing native vegetation shall be retained within this setback area. Water retention/detention areas shall be allowed in this setback area provided that the area is left in a natural state, and drainage conveyance through the setback area shall be allowed, as necessary, in order for stormwater to reach an external outfall. 4. The buffer area along Collier Boulevard/CR-951 and Vanderbilt Beach Road shall be 25 feet in width and shall conform to the vegetative requirements of a Type "B" buffer as provided for in the Collier County Land Development Code, in effect as of the date of adoption of this amendment [Ordinance No. 03-01, adopted January 16, 2003]. A loop road shall be constructed, internal to the subject property. This road shall be open to the public, in order to connect Vanderbilt Beach Road and Collier Boulevard, so as to provide an alternative to use of the intersection. 5. The maximum gross leaseable floor area of each individual office/medical/financial building footprint shall be 6,000 square feet. However, buildings may be connected by architectural treatments, and shall be designed to appear similar to residential structures through the treatment of rooflines and other architectural embellishments. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 20 of 32 8.A.5 Packet Pg. 140 Attachment: 3 CCPC Adoption Recommendations Urban GGE sub element (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261- 18 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. 6. No development of property within the Subdistrict shall commence until the abutting segment of Collier Boulevard is four-laned. 4. Urban Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict This Subdistrict consists of two infill areas. The two areas are located at the northwest corner of Collier Boulevard and Green Boulevard and at the northwest corner of Santa Barbara Boulevard and Golden Gate Parkway. Due to the existing zoning and land use pattern in proximity to the Estates Commercial In-fill Subdistrict (Urban Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict Map) and the need to ensure adequate development standards to buffer adjacent land uses, commercial uses shall be permitted under the following criteria: a. Commercial uses shall be limited to: 1. Low intensity commercial uses that are compatible with both residential and intermediate commercial uses, in order to provide for small scale shopping and personal needs, and 2. Intermediate commercial to provide for a wider variety of goods and services in areas that have a higher degree of automobile traffic. These uses shall be similar to C-1, C-2, or C-3 zoning districts outlined in the Collier County Land Development Code (Ordinance 91-102), adopted October 30, 1991. b. Rezones shall be encouraged in the form of a Planned Unit Development (there shall be no minimum acreage requirement for PUD rezones except for the requirement that all requests for rezoning must be at least fort y thousand (40,000) square feet in area unless the proposed rezone is an extension of an existing zoning district consistent with the Golden Gate Area Master Plan). c. Projects within this Subdistrict shall make provisions for shared parking arrangements with adjoining commercial developments when appropriate. d. Driveways and curb cuts for projects within this Subdistrict shall be consolidated with adjoining commercial developments. e. Access to projects shall not be permitted from Collier Boulevard. f. Any project located within this Subdistrict at the northwest corner of Golden Gate Parkway and Santa Barbara Boulevard, less and except an easement for Santa Barbara Boulevard right-of-way, shall be subject to the following additional development restrictions: 1. The site shall be limited to thirty-five thousand (35,000) square feet of building area. 2. Land uses shall be restricted to offices only. 3. All principal structures shall be required to have a minimum setback of one hundred (100) feet from the project's northern boundary. 4. The northern seventy-five (75) feet of the western sixty (60) percent of the site shall be a green area (open space area). It shall be utilized for only water management facilities, landscape buffers, and similar uses. 5. The western sixty (60) percent of the site shall have an outdoor pedestrian- friendly patio(s), that total at least five hundred (500) square feet in area and incorporate a minimum of: benches or seating areas for at least twelve (12) persons, and vegetative shading, and a waterfall or water feature of at least one hundred (100) square feet in area, and brick pavers. 6. A twenty-five (25) foot wide landscaped strip shall be provided along the entire frontage of both Golden Gate Parkway and Santa Barbara Boulevard. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 21 of 32 8.A.5 Packet Pg. 141 Attachment: 3 CCPC Adoption Recommendations Urban GGE sub element (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261- 19 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. 7. A minimum buffer of thirty-five (35) feet in width shall be provided along the project's western boundary and along the eastern forty (40) percent of the project's northern boundary. A minimum buffer of fifty (50) feet in width shall be provided along the western sixty (60) percent of the project's northern boundary. Where feasible, existing native vegetation shall be retained within these buffers along the project's western and northern boundaries. These buffers shall be supplemented with Oak or Mahogany trees planted a maximum of twenty (20) feet apart in a staggered manner; and a seven (7) foot wall, fence, or hedge that will, within two (2) years of planting, grow to a minimum height of seven (7) feet and be a minimum of ninety-five (95) percent opaque. 8. All buildings shall have tile or metal roofs, or decorative parapet walls above the roofline, and buildings shall be finished in light subdued colors except for decorative trim. 9. Building heights shall be limited to one (1)-story and a maximum of thirty- five (35) feet. 10. All lighting facilities shall be architecturally designed, and limited to a height of twenty-five (25) feet. Such lighting facilities shall be shielded from neighboring residential land uses. 11. There shall be no ingress or egress on Santa Barbara Boulevard. 5. Southbrooke Office Subdistrict The Southbrooke Office Subdistrict is approximately five (5) acres and is located approximately 1/4 mile east of Oakes Boulevard on the south side of Immokalee Road. he intent of the subdistrict is to permit general office, medical office, and business service uses generally consistent with those uses permissible by right, or as a conditional use in the C-1 Commercial Professional and General Office zoning district. Development within the Subdistrict is encouraged to be rezoned as a PUD in order to provide greater specificity of permitted land uses, development standards and any necessary operational characteristics. A maximum of 40,000 square feet of commercial development shall be permitted. All buildings will be limited to single-story, and shall be constructed in a common architectural theme. A minimum 30 feet in width vegetated buffer shall be provided adjacent to Autumn Oaks Lane, which shall consist of retained native vegetation. Access to the Subdistrict shall only be from Immokalee Road. C. LIST OF MAPS Urban Golden Gate Estates Future Land Use Map Urban Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict Pine Ridge Road Interchange Activity Center and Pine Ridge Road Mixed Use Subdistrict Urban Golden Gate Estates Neighborhood Center Collier Boulevard/Pine Ridge Road Center Commercial Western Estates Infill Subdistrict Golden Gate Parkway Interchange Conditional Uses Area Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict Southbrooke Office Subdistrict Conditional Uses Subdistrict: Golden Gate Parkway Special Provisions Special Exceptions to Conditional Use Locational Criteria in Golden Gate Estates GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 22 of 32 8.A.5 Packet Pg. 142 Attachment: 3 CCPC Adoption Recommendations Urban GGE sub element (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261- C.R. 951COLLIER BLVDI-75I-75I N T E R S TAT E -7 5 IMMOKALEE RD IMMOKALEE RD LIVINGSTON RDTAMIAMI TRL NDAVIS BLVDGOODLETTE RD NP I N E R I D G E R D R A D I O R D G .G . P K W Y LOGAN BLVD NSANTA BARBARA BLVDVANDERBILT BEACH RD AIRPORT PULLING RD NGO LD E N GATE BLVD 9TH ST NGR EEN BLVDOLD US 41RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK RDCOUNTY BARN RDAIRPORT PULLING RD SW I G G I N S PA S S R D 9TH ST ST51ST50ST49ST48ST47SR 26 E R 27 E R 28 E R 29 E URBAN GOLDEN GATE ESTATESFUTURE LAND USE MAP 0 1 2 30.5 Miles PREPARED BY: BETH YANG, AICPGROWTH MANAG EMENT DEPT.DATE: 2 /2019FILE: URBAN G OLDEN GATE ESTATES FLU.MXD ° COMMERCIAL DISTRICT Interchang e Activity Center Subd istrict(As Described in the Future Land Use Element in the GM P) Pine Ridge Road Mixed Use Subdistrict Comme rcial Western Estate s Infill Subdistrict Golde n Gate Estates CommercialInfill Sub district Sou thbrooke Office Subdistrict ESTAT ES DESIGNATION MIXED USE DISTRICT Residentia l Estates Subdist rict Neig hborhood Center Subd istrict Golde n Gate ParkwayInstitional Subd istrict Conditional Uses Subdistrict Conditional Use Subdist rict:Golde n Gate Parkway Spe cial Provisio ns THIS MAP CAN NOT BE INTERPRETED WITHOUT THE GOALS, OBJECTIVES, POLICIES AND LAND USE DESIGNATION DESCRIPTION SECTION OF THE GOLDENGATE AREA MASTER PLAN. NOTE : URBAN GOLDEN GATEFUTURE LAND USE MAP A D O P T E D - X X X X , 2 0 1 9 GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 23 of 32 8.A.5 Packet Pg. 143 Attachment: 3 CCPC Adoption Recommendations Urban GGE sub element (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261-CPSP-2018-2) Golden Gate PKWY CollierBLVDGreen BLVD Green BLVDGreen BLVD 39th ST SWCollier BLVDGolden Gate PKWY55th ST SWSanta Barbara BLVD55th TER SWTropical WAY15 th AVE SW Sunshine BLVDSalt ALY44th ST SW48th ST SWWestport LN Hunter BLVDSunset RD Sea Grass LN Star Grass LN Coronado PKWY 50th TER SWCedar Tree LN 24th AVE SW Copper Leaf LN 16th PL SW Painted Leaf LN 45th ST SW17 th AVE SW 25 th AVE SW40th TER SW47th TER SW47th ST SW21st AVE SW 19 th AVE SW 27 th AVE SW 23rd AVE SW 29 th AVE SW41st ST SW18th PL SW 46th TER SW49th ST SWTropicana B LV D 48th TER SW27th C T S W43rd LN SW51st TER SWMystic ALY Atoll CT 29 t h P L S W46th ST SW41st TER SW22nd PL SW45th TER SW18th CT SW 52nd TER SW51st ST SWToucan ALY24th PL SW44th TER SW19 th PL SW 50t h ST SW25th CT SW52nd ST SW28th AVE SW1 8 th A V E S W 53rd T E R S W 27th PL SW26th AVE SW 17th CT SW19th CT SW23rd PL SW 28th PL SW23rd CT SWLogan CT30th AVE SW54th ST SW20th PL SW 2 0 t h A V E S W Washington LN 42nd ST SW4 9 t h T E R S W21st PL SW 2 5 t h P L S W 54th TER SW26th PL SW49th LN SW17th PL SW Heritage CIR 53rd LN SW52nd LN SWJefferson LN 43rd ST SW22nd AVE SW 53rd ST SWHemingway CIR 42nd TER SWC o r a l P a l m s L N Lucerne RD43rd TER SWSunnyland LN Hemingway LN E 20th CT SWLaurel Ridge LN 1 9 t h AV E S W 53rd ST SWTropical WAY2 8 t h A V E S W 22nd AVE SW 19th CT SW 15 th AVE SW 2 9 th A V E S W26th PL SW42nd ST SW29 t h P L S W 27 th C T S W 25 th AVE SW 50th TER SW45th ST SW16th PL SW 20th AVE SW 44th TER SW30 th AV E S W 51st S T S W 46th ST SW4 4 t h T ER S W55th TER SW25th PL SW50th ST S W 19th CT SW 18th AVE SW 19 t h C T S W 17th AVE SW 4 5 t h S T S W45th ST SW2 8 t h A V E S W 25th AVE SW 46th ST SW4 4 t h ST SW2 0 th P L S W 19th PL SW 21st AVE SW 55th ST SW16th PL SW 22nd AVE SW 46th TER SW43rd TER SW27th PL SW18th CT SW 19th PL SW 23rd AVE SW 25 th C T S W 20th AVE SW 4 7 t h S T S W19th PL SW 51st ST SW50th TER SW18 th AVE SW 44th ST SW2 6 t h A V E S W 5 3r d ST SW20 th P L S W 52nd S T S W 30 th AVE SW 17th PL SW 17 th AVE SW 2 8 t h P L S W21st PL SW41st TER SW54th TER SW17th PL SW 49th ST SW23rd PL SW 19th AVE SW 21st AVE SW Toucan ALY54th ST SW22nd PL SW 52nd TE R S W 21st PL SW 17 th AVE SW 25th AVE SW 41st ST SW50th ST SW20th PL SW 27th AVE SW28th AVE SW51st TER SW45th TER SW23rd CT SW 17th AVE SW 5 4 t h S T S Wº0 1,000 2,000500 FeetPREPARED BY: BETH YANG, AICPGROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENTFILE: Golden Gate Estates Com mercial Infill Subdistrict.mxdDATE: 07/2019 URBAN GOLDEN GATE ESTATES COMMERCIAL INFILL SUBDISTRICTCOLLIER COUNTY, FLO RI DA LEGEND URBAN GOLDEN GATE ESTATES COMMERCIALINFILL SUBDISTRICT AMENDED - JANUARY 25, 2007(Ord. No. 2007-19)AMENDED - OCTOBER 14, 2008(Ord. No. 2008-59) AMENDED - SEPTEMBER 10, 2003(Ord. No. 2003-44) GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 24 of 32 8.A.5 Packet Pg. 144 Attachment: 3 CCPC Adoption Recommendations Urban GGE sub element (9747 : Golden Gate Area GREEN BLVD GOLDEN GATE PKWY LOGANBLVDSANTABARBARABLVDI-75I-75I-75I-75 IMMOKALEE RD COLLIER BLVDLIVINGSTON RDPINE RI DGE RD AIRPORT PULLING RD NGOLDEN GATE BLVD W VANDERBILT BEACH RD URBAN GOLDEN GATE ESTATESNEIGHBORHOOD CENTERCollier County, Florid a AMENDED - OCTOBER 26, 2004(Ord. No. 2004-71)AMENDED - JANUARY 25, 2007(Ord. No. 2007-19) AMEN DED - SEPTEMBER 10, 2003(Ord. No. 2003-44) AMENDED - OCTOBER 14, 2008(Ord. No. 2008-59) AMEN DED - SEPTEMBER 14, 2011(Ord. No. 2011-29) URBAN GOLDEN GATE ESTATESNEIGHBORHOOD CENTERSLEGEND URBAN GOLDEN GATE ESTATESNEIGHBORHOOD CENTER01230.5 Miles ³ PREPARED BY: BETH YANG, AICPGROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENTFILE: Urban Golden Gate Estates Neighborhood Centers.mxdDATE: 07/2019GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 25 of 32 8.A.5 Packet Pg. 145 Attachment: 3 CCPC Adoption Recommendations Urban GGE sub element (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261- GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 26 of 32 8.A.5 Packet Pg. 146 Attachment: 3 CCPC Adoption Recommendations Urban GGE sub element (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261- COMMERCIAL WESTERN ESTATES INFILL SUBDISTRICT GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 27 of 32 8.A.5 Packet Pg. 147 Attachment: 3 CCPC Adoption Recommendations Urban GGE sub element (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261- INTERCHANGE CONDITIONAL GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY USES AREA GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 28 of 32 8.A.5 Packet Pg. 148 Attachment: 3 CCPC Adoption Recommendations Urban GGE sub element (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261- U30 GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 29 of 32 8.A.5 Packet Pg. 149 Attachment: 3 CCPC Adoption Recommendations Urban GGE sub element (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261-CPSP-2018-2) GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 30 of 32 8.A.5 Packet Pg. 150 Attachment: 3 CCPC Adoption Recommendations Urban GGE sub element (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261- GOLDEN GATE PKY CONDITIONAL USE SUBDISTRICT: GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY SPECIAL PROVISIONSCOLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA SANTABARBARABLVD.INTERSTATE-75 PREPARED BY: GIS/MAPPING SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT DATE: 6/2016 FILE: GMPA20150002525_CP_2015_3A.MXD 0.1 0 0.1 0.20.05 Miles ¹Legend CONDITIONAL USE SUBDISTRICT: GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY SPECIAL PROVISIONS ADOPTED - MAY 10, 2016 (Ord. No. 2016-12) 4/29/19 Page 33 of 34 GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 31 of 32 8.A.5 Packet Pg. 151 Attachment: 3 CCPC Adoption Recommendations Urban GGE sub element (9747 : Golden Gate Area COLLIER BLVDI-75I-75IM MOKALEE RD LIVINGSTON RDCOLLIER BLVDCOLLIER BLVDLIVINGSTON RDPINE RIDGE RD LOGAN BLVD NVANDERBILT BEACH RD Pine Ridge RD Gree n BLVDOakes BLVDI-75 SLogan BLVD SI-75 NSoll STGolden Gate PKWY 7th AVE SW 1st AVE SW 3rd AVE SW 5th AVE SW 1st AVE NW 5th AVE NW 7th AVE NW 70th ST SW68th ST SW3rd AVE NW 66th ST SWWestport LN Bu r Oak s LN Logan BLVD N11th AVE SW 13 th AVE SW 15 th AVE SW Dog woo d WAY Sycamore DR Se a Gra ss L N Star G rass LN Ced ar Tre e L N Teak Wood DR Lancewood WAY Shady Oaks LN Coral Wood DR Bottlebrush LN Cop pe r L e af LN Hid de n Oa ks L N Painted Leaf LN Bo xwo od WAY Golden Oaks LN Cherry Wood DR Spanish O aks LN En glish O ak s LN Sandalwood LN Sable Ridge LN Au tum n Oa ks L N Tallowood WAY Hic kory Woo d DR Nap a Wo od s WAY Vanderbilt Beach RD Sta nd in g Oa ks LN Tam arind Ridge DR 64th ST SWPalmetto Woods DR Mah og a ny Rid ge DR Livingston Woods LN Hawthorn Woods WAY 63rd ST SW60th ST SW58th ST SWSanta Barbara BLVDPerkins DRSunrise CTBritney LNNeffs WAYCade CTSanta Barbara BLVD1 1 2 3 4 7 5 7 6 8 5 1 4 1 3 6 2 1 4 3 2 7 6 5 3 5 2 1 9 8 9 7 7 5 9 8 7 6 5 2 3 9 4 4 3 2 3 6 1 9 2 5 8 6 4 3 7 9 2 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 7 89 9 976853124 7 3 6 8 8 6 9 5 4 9 4 2 7 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 2 6 1 3 4 1 80 9 1 8 7 6 1 5 1 4 2 93 3 9 79 3 66 4 8 108 9465 9 8 5 7 52 7 37 8 6 51 5 2 6 4 6 3 2 7 5 8 38 2 9 91 93 64489030 169 31 80 9 6160 96 8 7 9 6 1 8 7 5 6 5 4 4 3 3 2 372 156 52 53 68 69 10 84 85 118 15 44 45 6 60 61 16 16 45 75 7646 17 18 76 85 16 77 24 11 1692 16 84 41 15 88 69 892573 14 40 72 68 57 13 53 17 12 3256 33 48 49 52 128 64 65 80 81 120 37 96 10 9 97 188 11 36 177 178 21 179 11 180 185 22 21 20 186 11 176 187 96 81 9817493433666518508297 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 3 170 171 174 175 173 58 172 4 11 14 15 13 14 56 12 10 146 41 73 74 89 39 90 38 42 37 40 36 35 34 26 32 33 30 31 29 28 27 26 24 25 23 65 98 96 24 67 958635258555 54 3626 66 2429 83 28 5927 60 34 43 33 918266 76 37 44 75 65 50 97 9823 92 8453 98 97 25 95 8065 97 64 7963 96 8266 89 47 33 34 50 8180 73 49 88 17 48 65 31 4016 64 72 32 18 33 41 90 40 32 49 87 48 25 74 15 71 15 5855 34 24 16 17 63 98423950 31 3126 30 32 10 79 25 28 18 9582 23 41 74 21 18 27 29 47 26 55 66 90 10 27 71 23 23 26 24 87 13 14 39 42 12 20 28 22 26 17 22 25 58 19 9178 24 23 97 75 19 20 31 34 18 9446 30 21 23 28 56 625943 35 33 32 27 26 25 20 29 24 57 18 72 7330 56 88 89 17 25 17 27 28 26 15 36 25 147 24 92 55 57 40 23 22 57 13 15 91 16 21 17 73 383960 15 61 1837 48 82 22 83 40 14 59 19 81 62 36 84 4158 13 41 20 63 35 42 8085 43 64 42 12 57 44 64 21 45 34 79 43 86 96 20 46 63 52 56 51 47 81 22 65 50 48 33 78 49 65 44 87 59 60 49 55 10 62 39 80 66 58 23 64 70 48 77 32 57 88 56 47 48 45 99 49 55 54 28 14 39 38 55 16 23 15 97 24 32 70 24 4731 71 25 18 62 10 17 46 49 9983 56 50 42 19 80 67 43 54 79 57 75 41 55 66 27 44 71 17 35 8833 59 51 67 33 73 50 12 13 20 65 30 40 32 40 26 74 64 96 71 22 54 77 86 48 97 14 983482 16 81 83 58 94 15 9063 9178 95 87 72 76 31 21 42 41 18 39 33 43 99 10 54 20 73 87 89 72 29 70 74 38 34 47 28 23 22 54 37 39 19 88 78 32 32 24 44 21 93 79 12 13 27 14 94 24 39 89 48 43 23 29 70 38 67 56 92 7727 13 28 52 19 59 30 15 31 18 45 72 29 38 30 46 71 9935 88 39 19 47 62 79 69 68 53 63 78 85 51 75 46 47 60 99 41 87 20 76 43 35 52 77 92 36 37 71 92 31 50 14 22 53 62 36 22 21 61 26 12 42 27 83 46 79 52 58 35 6634 44 63 87 37 45 91 55 40 61 86 93 55 79 57 59 46 51 95 26 60 30 54 70 76 20 94 61 84 96 88 93 89 91 77 36 56 42 58 82 85 69 51 69 25 70 21 84 94 63 68 64 74 23 78 95 53 80 40 90 95 98 75 86 90 83 72 29 74 85 83 73 89 62 97 85 68 67 88 55 89 58 8475 86 99 90 93 67 84 87 7482 76 87 53 98 45 92 32 61 17 85 53 81 57 99 10 84 43 91 98 63 56 78 29 78 71 7735 31 86 94 62 50 94 96 12 83 13 41 53 95 15 99 9380 14 27 68 16 42 25 51 28 33 46 30 52 67 68 4847 60 64 49 94 53 75 40 32 93 34 7772 36 81 25 18 71 67 55 82 16 59 7978 48 83 84 78 26 76 17 33 61 9276 46 54 49 45 62 81 47 91 69 95 86 90 77 52 34 19 68 85 35 74 42 58 2423 66 82 3840 69 70 62 22 44 86 67 21 75 51 87 59 64 73 37 20 70 43 6152 73 60 97 39 82 99 71 63 72 57 30 69 46 54 93 74 64 36 92 86 75 60 56 35 61 94 98 94 44 30 37 36 53 79 59 28 45 98 19 81 77 96 63 20 85 41 29 78 64 63 91 39 58 50 21 10 67 83 84 93 95 78 43 76 80 27 82 85 44 65 80 38 66 60 45 66 90 99 49 62 35 88 75 69 62 68 51 31 52 34 91 92 42 12 47 31 61 69 63 13 53 59 77 84 23 62 79 90 99 70 30 26 83 14 37 27 68 70 75 97 50 54 61 64 36 28 51 87 46 86 47 98 19 89 47 78 22 94 6746 76 57 59 60 45 52 59 45 18 54 45 14 77 6219 15 90 52 7372 96 40 74 43 30 56 60 76 37 27 21 67 54 91 71 74 10 6144 84 51 53 35 37 29 44 83 28 46 12 75 12 63 38 71 39 76 99 20 21 34 29 55 20 39 97 44 77 9368 38 31 27 66 13 85 99 38 36 94 13 14 58 29 38 23 98 22 15 26 78 69 92 61 92 19 64 62 95 45 21 8670 87 44 70 34 43 52 83 82 53 47 22 43 52 79 30 69 50 84 35 36 42 60 41 55 53 85 62 36 46 86 91 51 68 35 59 54 20 9483 43 9951 13 46 28 37 10 65 67 75 78 93 99 67 93 18 52 98 54 69 35 60 9781 83 82 42 26 7761 22 36 37 45 85 90 70 53 66 67 76 84 89 86 63 9680 44 92 91 74 43 8739 73 86 68 69 50 38 59 71 7256 88 55 38 75 65 90 51 54 55 39 71 48 40 79 70 29 95 64 5842 49 19 47 54 48 41 58 74 87 41 42 57 74 66 91 69 51 96 67 59 27 70 68 58 73 28 56 49 92 69 80 79 95 50 57 78 7172 77 93 76 72 94 75 2223 74 19 73 4445 82 81 72 66 83 2124 88 67 84 43 88 46 85 18 65 11 89 20 89 86 68 2542 87 87 47 90 88 90 19 64 89 26 99 69 41 86 98 91 48 33 97 18 63 27 70 96 40 85 95 49 92 62 17 94 71 28 84 93 39 92 93 5061 16 72 2938 83 51 94 17 15 60 30 73 37 95 82 5259 1431 74 157 36 8196 53 10 58 1332 75 35 8097 5457 1233 7679 34 98 55567778 57 99 158 159 58 89 87 160 161 162 95 81 163 16 12 164 88 165 148 166 8E 11 167 168 15 14 96 57 17 643233 40 4125 73 88 8065 897224 814948 56 97 12 112 114 13 113 28 15 29 149 15 111 44 14 47 13 60 13 61 76 12 11 10 12 111 16 114 5E 6E 7E 16 110 105 115 119 111 8E 110 100 118 114 77 10 115 109 127 117 116 117 101 126 15 105 115 122 10 116 114 14 125 13 8W16 103 113 112 12 104 124 105 107 15 106 92 109 10 108 123 110 110 126 101 105 16 112 17 7 100 31 11 11 113 109 113 125 14 108 93 107 104 106 114 19 112 16 113 10 12 124 10 12 8W 111 128 13 119 118 117 119 118 14 111 111 111 111111 111 111 111 111 123 115 114 119 113 7W 6W 5W 106 105 121 120 107121 149 150 151 152 123 153 110 154 112 119 118 117 110 115 110 112 114 116 113 117 115 114 113 116 112 110 118 155 116 113 114 114 112 119 156 115 117 113112 115110 119 116 117 118 114 110 115 118117 116 117 119 157 117 110 116 119 116 118 115 110 113 112 112 118 115 110 116 117 119 119 118 158 159 113118 160 161 117 114 162 163 115116 164 165 166 167 168 110 169 170 112 171 113 172 133 134 114 135 136 115 137 138 116 139 140 119 117 141 118 142 117 143 116 118 144 115 114 119 113 145 112 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 105 106 122 104 103 127 106103 107 121104105120 115 102 122 116 117 118 119 103 108 101 104 106 104105126127148 103106125128 102 147 107124129146 101108123130 100 145 102 109122 101 131 100 144 103 106 104 121 102 103 103 104 125 101 124 102 103 127 107 102 100 108 100 120 101 101 102 120 132 109 104 105 103100 125 100 123 126 127 101 102 128 105 143 106 126 109 108 102 101 103 100 107 109 106 108 128 126 125 100 127 102 109 120 108 107 124 123 120 101 100 123 133 105 122 121 106 100 102 103 101 104 122 109 102 101 124108 100 142 125 102 107 101 106 100 107 103 109 108 126 102 120 100 121 103 104 105 109 106 101 109 102 108 107 106103 134141 113 135 112 140 184183182 136 181 139 180179 137 178 138 177176175174173 105 132 104 109 100 131 105 108 120 130 107129 102 101 106 103 104 128 105 105 106 107 127 108 104 120 109 126 103125 102124 122 121 101 123 120 124 123 125 100 126 121 127 122 128 129 139 140 138 137 136 135 134 133 141 132 142 143 107 144 145 124 122 120 128 121105120104 121 155 892524 2120 4 22 109 150 104 112 111 130 131 4 1 107 49 81 11 13 12 10 116 104 107 19 116 155 8840 16 14 18 154 113 153 112 114 115 152 151 3 32 111 106 111 108 107 108 114 5 110 5 ¹ SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS TO CONDITIONAL USE LOCATIONAL CRITERIAIN GOLDEN GATE ESTATES North 180 feet of Tract 1 07, Unit 30. Tract 2 2, Unit 97 PREPARED BY: BETH YANG, AICPGROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENTFILE: Special Exceptions to Conditional Use.mxdDATE: 05/2018 0 0.5 1 1.50.25 Miles ADOPTED - XXXX(Ord. No. XXXX) Legend Conditional Use Exceptions GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 32 of 32 8.A.5 Packet Pg. 152 Attachment: 3 CCPC Adoption Recommendations Urban GGE sub element (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261- Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. “Exhibit A” GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN RURAL GOLDEN GATE ESTATES SUB-ELEMENT Prepared by Collier County Zoning Division Prepared for COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Adopted (date) GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 1 of 42 8.A.6 Packet Pg. 153 Attachment: 4 CCPC Adoption Recommendations Rural GGE sub element (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261- Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element ii The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. AMENDMENTS TO COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN: RURAL GOLDEN GATE ESTATES SUB-ELEMENT DATE AMENDED ORDINANCE NO. (date), 2019 2019-(#) GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 2 of 42 8.A.6 Packet Pg. 154 Attachment: 4 CCPC Adoption Recommendations Rural GGE sub element (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261- Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element iii The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page A. Goals, Objectives and Policies 1 B. Land Use Designation Description Section 10 1. ESTATES DESIGNATION 10 A. Estates – Mixed Use District 1. Residential Estates Subdistrict 2. Neighborhood Center Subdistrict 3. Conditional Uses Subdistrict 4. Mission Subdistrict 5. Everglades – Randall Subdistrict B. Estates - Commercial District 17 1. Randall Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict 2. Estates Shopping Center Subdistrict 2. AGRICULTURE/RURAL DESIGNATION 27 A. Agricultural/Rural Settlement Area 27 3. OVERLAYS AND SPECIAL FEATURES 27 A. Southern Golden Gate Estates Natural Resource Protection Overlay 27 C. List of maps 28 Rural Golden Gate Estates Future Land Use Map Rural Golden Gate Estates Neighborhood Centers Wilson Boulevard/Golden Gate Boulevard Center Golden Gate Boulevard/Everglades Boulevard Center Immokalee Road/Everglades Boulevard Center Randall Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict Mission Subdistrict Estates Shopping Center Subdistrict Estates Shopping Center Subdistrict Conceptual Plan Everglades – Randall Subdistrict Immokalee Road/Randall Boulevard Planning Study Area GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 3 of 42 8.A.6 Packet Pg. 155 Attachment: 4 CCPC Adoption Recommendations Rural GGE sub element (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261- 1 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. A. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES GOAL 1: TO GUIDE LAND USE AND PUBLIC FACILITY DECISION MAKING AND TO BALANCE THE NEED TO PROVIDE BASIC SERVICES WITH NATURAL RESOURCE CONCERNS THROUGH A WELL PLANNED MIX OF COMPATIBLE LAND USES WHICH ENSURE THE HEALTH, SAFETY, WELFARE, AND QUALITY OF LIFE OF THE LOCAL RESIDENTS. OBJECTIVE 1.1: Develop new or revised uses of land consistent with designations outlined on the Rural Golden Gate Estates Future Land Use Map and provisions found in the Land Use Designation Description Section of this Sub-Element. Policy 1.1.1: The Policies under the above Objective shall identify the Future Land Use Designations, Districts, and Subdistricts for Rural Golden Gate Estates. Policy 1.1.2: The Land Use Designation Description Section of this Element shall provide the standards and permitted uses for Rural Golden Gate Estates Future Land Use Districts and Subdistricts. Policy 1.1.3: The Rural Golden Gate Estates Future Land Use Map and companion Future Land Use Designations, Districts, and Subdistricts shall be binding on all development orders unless otherwise permitted in this Master Plan effective with the adoption of this Master Plan. Policy 1.1.4: The ESTATES Future Land Use Designation shall include Future Land Use Districts and Subdistricts for: A. ESTATES – MIXED USE DISTRICT 1. Residential Estates Subdistrict 2. Neighborhood Center Subdistrict 3. Conditional Uses Subdistrict 4. Mission Subdistrict 5. Everglades – Randall Subdistrict B. ESTATES – COMMERCIAL DISTRICT 1. Randall Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict 2. Estates Shopping Center Subdistrict Policy 1.1.5: The AGRICULTURAL/RURAL Future Land Use Designation shall include the following Future Land Use District: A. RURAL SETTLEMENT AREA DISTRICT GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 4 of 42 8.A.6 Packet Pg. 156 Attachment: 4 CCPC Adoption Recommendations Rural GGE sub element (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261- 2 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. Policy 1.1.6: Overlays and Special Features shall include: A. Southern Golden Gate Estates Natural Resource Protection Overlay Policy 1.1.7: Conditional Use requests within Rural Golden Gate Estates shall adhere to the guidelines outlined in the Conditional Uses Subdistrict. Policy 1.1.8: To obtain Conditional Use approval, a super majority vote (minimum of 4 votes) by the Board of Zoning Appeals shall be required. Policy 1.1.9: No development orders shall be issued inconsistent with the Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub- Element with the exception of those unimproved properties granted a positive determination through the Zoning Re-evaluation Program and identified on the Future Land Use Map Series as properties consistent by Policy and those development orders issued pursuant to conditional uses and rezones approved based on the County-Wide Future Land Use Element (adopted January 10, 1989, Ordinance 89-05) which was in effect at the time of approval. Any subsequent development orders shall also be reviewed for consistency with the Growth Management Plan based on the County-Wide Future Land Use Element. Policy 1.1.10: The sites containing existing public educational plants and ancillary plants, and the undeveloped sites owned by the Collier County School Board for future public educational plants and ancillary plants, within the Rural Golden Gate Estates area, are depicted on the Future Land Use Map Series in the countywide FLUE and on the Public School Facilities Element Map Series, and referenced in FLUE Policy 5.14 and Intergovernmental Coordination Element Policy 1.2.6. All of these sites are subject to the general Interlocal Agreement, adopted on May 15, 2003 by the Collier County School Board and on May 27, 2003 by the Board of County Commissioners, and as subsequently amended and restated, with an effective date of December 2008, and subject to the implementing land development regulations to be adopted. OBJECTIVE 1.2: Ensure public facilities are provided at an acceptable level of service. Policy 1.2.1: Requests for new uses of land shall be subject to level of service standards and concurrency requirements for public facilities as outlined in the Capital Improvement Element of the Growth Management Plan. OBJECTIVE 1.3: Protect and preserve the valuable natural resources within the Rural Golden Gate Estates. Policy 1.3.1: The County shall protect and preserve natural resources within the Rural Golden Gate Estates in accordance with the Objectives and Policies contained within Goals 6 and 7 of the Collier County Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME). GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 5 of 42 8.A.6 Packet Pg. 157 Attachment: 4 CCPC Adoption Recommendations Rural GGE sub element (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261- 3 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. Policy 1.3.2: As provided for in CCME Policy 6.1.1, the subdivision of tracts up to 13 acres in size and designated Residential Estates Subdistrict shall not trigger preserve requirements. Policy 1.3.3: Collier County shall coordinate its planning and permitting activities within the Rural Golden Gate Estates with all other applicable environmental planning, permitting and regulatory agencies to ensure that all Federal, State and local natural resource protection regulations are being enforced. OBJECTIVE 1.4: Provide a living environment within the Rural Golden Gate Estates, which is aesthetically acceptable and protects the quality of life. Policy 1.4.1: Collier County shall provide a living environment that is aesthetically acceptable and protects the quality of life through the enforcement of applicable codes and laws. Policy 1.4.2: The County's Code Enforcement Board shall strictly enforce the Land Development Code and other applicable codes and laws to control the illegal storage of machinery, vehicles and junk, and the illegal operation of commercial activities within the Rural Golden Gate Estates. GOAL 2: TO RECOGNIZE THAT THE AREA WHICH LIES SOUTH OF INTERSTATE 75 (ALLIGATOR ALLEY) TO US 41 (TAMIAMI TRAIL) IS AN AREA OF SPECIAL ENVIRONMENTAL SENSITIVITY AND IS BIOLOGICALLY AND HYDROLOGICALLY IMPORTANT THROUGH PARTICIPATION IN THE PICAYUNE STRAND RESTORATION PROJECT AS PART OF THE FEDERAL SAVE OUR EVERGLADES PROGRAM. BASED UPON SUCH CONDITIONS, THE STATE HAS ACQUIRED OWNERSHIP OF ALL LANDS WITHIN THE SOUTHERN GOLDEN GATE ESTATES (SGGE) PICAYUNE STRAND RESTORATION PROJECT AREA. GOAL 3: TO PROVIDE FOR LIMITED COMMERCIAL SERVICES AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR PURPOSES OF SERVING THE RURAL NEEDS OF GOLDEN GATE ESTATES RESIDENTS, SHORTENING VEHICULAR TRIPS, AND PRESERVING RURAL CHARACTER. OBJECTIVE 3.1: Meet the locational and rural design criteria contained within the Estates Designation, Estates- Mixed Use District, Neighborhood Center Subdistrict and Conditional Use Subdistrict of this Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element, of the Collier County Growth Management Plan when considering the placement and designation of Neighborhood Centers and Conditional Uses within Rural Golden Gate Estates. Policy 3.1.1: Neighborhood Centers within Rural Golden Gate Estates shall be subject to the locational and rural design criteria established within the Estates Designation, Estates – Mixed Use District, Neighborhood Center Subdistrict of this Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element, of the Collier County Growth Management Plan. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 6 of 42 8.A.6 Packet Pg. 158 Attachment: 4 CCPC Adoption Recommendations Rural GGE sub element (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261- 4 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. Policy 3.1.2: Conditional Uses within Rural Golden Gate Estates shall be subject to locational and dimensional criteria established within the Conditional Use Subdistrict in the Land Use Designation Description section of this Rural Golden Gate Sub-Element. OBJECTIVE 3.2: Provide for new commercial development within Neighborhood Centers and other future Commercial Land Use Designations. Policy 3.2.1: Within one year of the completion of the Randall Blvd. and Oil Well Rd. Corridor study, the County Manager or designee shall initiate an evaluation of the future land uses along Immokalee Rd. in the vicinity of Randall Blvd., Oil Well Rd. and Wilson Blvd. (as generally shown on the Immokalee Rd./Randall Blvd. Planning Study Area Map) and make recommendations to the Board of County Commissioners for any proposed changes to the future land uses. GOAL 4: TO PRESERVE THE AREA’S RURAL CHARACTER, AS DEFINED BY LARGE WOODED LOTS, THE KEEPING OF LIVESTOCK, THE ABILITY TO GROW CROPS, WILDLIFE ACTIVITY, ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP, LOW-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, AND LIMITATIONS ON COMMERCIAL AND CONDITIONAL USES. OBJECTIVE 4.1: Balance the provision of public infrastructure with the need to preserve the rural character of Rural Golden Gate Estates. Policy 4.1.1: Future road and bridge improvements in Rural Golden Gate Estates shall not only provide for safety and reasonable mobility, but shall also contribute to the rural character of the area. Transportation improvements shall be designed in context with their setting. Policy 4.1.2: The County shall initiate architectural standard requirements in the Land Development Code within two years of adoption that apply to commercial, conditional use and essential services facilities, reflecting the rural character of the Estates area and providing coherence and area identity. Policy 4.1.3: The County Manager or designee shall create a public network of greenway corridors within Rural Golden Gate Estates that interconnects public lands and permanently protected green space. The greenway network shall consist of interconnected trails and paths that allow people to move about the Estates area by means other than motorized vehicles. All greenways shall be constructed within or abutting existing or future public easements or rights-of-way. In creating the greenway network, the County shall not employ eminent domain proceedings. OBJECTIVE 4.2: Provide for the protection of the rural character of Rural Golden Gate Estates. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 7 of 42 8.A.6 Packet Pg. 159 Attachment: 4 CCPC Adoption Recommendations Rural GGE sub element (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261- 5 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. Policy 4.2.1: Rural character protection provisions shall provide for the preservation of such rural amenities as, but not limited to, wooded lots, the keeping of livestock, the ability to grow crops, wildlife activity, and low-density residential development. Policy 4.2.2: The growing of food crops and/or the keeping of livestock on properties within Rural Golden Gate Estates shall be permitted, provided that such activities are conducted according to the Land Development Code. Policy 4.2.3: Rural character shall be further protected by resisting site-specific Master Plan changes that are out of scale or character with the rural quality of Golden Gate Estates. Policy 4.2.4: Recognizing the low density in Rural Golden Gate Estates, the County will initiate a review of written notification requirements in the Land Development Code and the Administrative Code related to land use petitions in Golden Gate Estates, within 1 year of adoption, and consider increasing the specified distance, with particular attention to properties located on dead-end streets. Policy 4.2.5: Consistent with public safety requirements and best practices for rural areas, outdoor lighting within Rural Golden Gate Estates shall be placed, constructed and maintained in such manner as to prevent or reduce light pollution. In implementing this Policy, the County shall: a. Adhere to the “Collier County Lighting Standards” (County Manager’s Office Standards dated January 6, 2017) as amended, with respect to new and existing County owned or maintained sites and structures. b. Continue to coordinate with FPL and FDOT to improve roadway and security lighting consistent with International Dark Skies Association best practices. c. Consider changes to the Land Development Code and other applicable ordinances to create voluntary or mandatory outdoor lighting standards for commercial, residential or other uses consistent with International Dark Skies Association best practices, and determine the extent such standards apply to new or existing development. OBJECTIVE 4.3: Encourage the preservation of natural resources in Rural Golden Gate Estates, including protection and enhancement of its watershed. Policy 4.3.1: The Land Development Code shall continue to allow and further encourage the preservation of native vegetation and wildlife indigenous to the Rural Golden Gate Estates. Policy 4.3.2: The County shall continue to pursue the Watershed Management Plan initiatives in Rural Golden Gate Estates as financial and staff resources become available. Policy 4.3.3: The County shall encourage the combination of parcels smaller than 2.25 acres with other parcels in order to preserve and enhance low-density environmental advantages. Within two years of GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 8 of 42 8.A.6 Packet Pg. 160 Attachment: 4 CCPC Adoption Recommendations Rural GGE sub element (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261- 6 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. adoption of this policy, County staff will present recommendations for property owner incentives to the Board of County Commissioners. Policy 4.3.4: The County will evaluate the use of transferable development rights for the purpose of securing the preservation of wetland or other environmentally significant land within Rural Golden Gate Estates, in a timeframe directed by the Board. Policy 4.3.5: Within two years of adoption, the County, in coordination with the Floodplain Management Committee, will initiate a study on the feasibility of dispersed water management (DWM) for single family Estates lots, and determine the extent to which it will rely on voluntary, incentive or mandatory provisions and whether provisions will apply to developed and undeveloped Estates parcels. Policy 4.3.6: The County will continue to identify and implement educational opportunities related to water resources for parcel owners, homeowners, builders, real estate professionals and the public to aid in understanding and addressing site-specific financial and environmental impacts as well as area-wide impacts to water resources. Policy 4.3.7: The County will periodically coordinate with the South Florida Water Management District to review the Level of Service Standards for primary water management canals within the County and their effect on Rural Golden Gate Estates. Policy 4.3.8: The County shall continue to pursue a best management practices approach to making septage treatment available to residents and businesses within Rural Golden Gate Estates, as a component of bio-solid processing, either directly, through a private entity, or through a public- private partnership. GOAL 5: GOLDEN GATE ESTATES TO PROVIDE FOR A SAFE AND EFFICIENT COUNTY AND LOCAL ROADWAY NETWORK, WHILE AT THE SAME TIME SEEKING TO PRESERVE THE RURAL CHARACTER OF RURAL GOLDEN GATE ESTATES IN FUTURE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE GOLDEN GATE AREA. OBJECTIVE 5.1: Increase the number of route alternatives for traffic moving through the Rural Golden Gate Area in both east-west and north-south directions, consistent with neighborhood traffic safety considerations, and consistent with the preservation of the area’s rural character. Policy 5.1.1: In planning to increase the number of route alternatives through the Rural Golden Gate Estates, Collier County will prioritize the following routes over other alternatives: a. The extension of Vanderbilt Beach Road from its current terminus to DeSoto Boulevard. b. The development of a north-south connection from the eastern terminus of White Boulevard to Golden Gate Boulevard. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 9 of 42 8.A.6 Packet Pg. 161 Attachment: 4 CCPC Adoption Recommendations Rural GGE sub element (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261- 7 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. c. The development of a new east-west roadway crossing the Estates Area south of Golden Gate Boulevard. Policy 5.1.2: The County shall coordinate with FDOT and the Metropolitan Planning Organization to submit a revised interchange justification report for an interchange at I-75 in the vicinity of Everglades Blvd. (Section 31-34, Township 49, Range 28). Policy 5.1.3: Everglades Blvd., between Golden Gate Blvd and I-75, shall not be expanded beyond 4 lanes. OBJECTIVE 5.2: Increase linkages within the local road system for the purposes of limiting traffic on arterials and major collectors within Rural Golden Gate Estates, shortening vehicular trips, and increasing overall road system capacity. Policy 5.2.1: The County shall continue to explore alternative financing methods to facilitate both east- west and north-south bridging of canals within Rural Golden Gate Estates. Policy 5.2.2: The County shall update the 2008 Bridge Study to prioritize bridge construction based on emergency response times, evacuation times, cost components, anticipated development patterns and other considerations and shall report its recommendations to the Board of County Commissioners within two years of adoption of this policy. Policy 5.2.3: Planning and right-of-way acquisition for bridges within the Estates Area local road system shall include consideration of the costs and benefits of including sidewalks and bike lanes. Policy 5.2.4: Sidewalks and bike lanes shall provide access to government facilities, schools, commercial areas and the planned Metropolitan Planning Organization greenway network. Policy 5.2.5: Planning, funding and implementation of potential greenway trails shall be coordinated between the County and the Metropolitan Planning Organization. OBJECTIVE 5.3: Explore alternative financing methods to accelerate paving of lime rock roads. Policy 5.3.1: The County will consider the acceleration of the paving of lime rock roads, including a cost/benefit analysis, in its annual budget review. GOAL 6: TO PROTECT THE LIVES AND PROPERTY OF THE RESIDENTS OF THE RURAL GOLDEN GATE ESTATES , AS WELL AS THE HEALTH OF THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT, THROUGH THE PROVISION OF EMERGENCY SERVICES THAT PREPARE FOR, MITIGATE, AND RESPOND TO, NATURAL AND MANMADE DISASTERS. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 10 of 42 8.A.6 Packet Pg. 162 Attachment: 4 CCPC Adoption Recommendations Rural GGE sub element (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261- 8 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. OBJECTIVE 6.1: Coordinate with local emergency services officials in engineering and constructing road improvements within Rural Golden Gate Estates to ensure that the access needs of fire department, police and emergency management personnel and vehicles are met. Policy 6.1.1: Collier County shall hold at least one annual public meeting with Golden Gate Area emergency services providers and the local civic association in order to ensure that emergency needs are addressed during the acquisition of right-of-way for design and construction of road improvements. Policy 6.1.2: Collier County shall continue to coordinate with Golden Gate Area emergency services providers to prioritize necessary road improvements related to emergency evacuation needs. OBJECTIVE 6.2: Ensure that the needs of all applicable emergency services providers are included and coordinated in the overall public project design for capital improvement projects within the Rural Golden Gate Estates. Policy 6.2.1: Preparation of Collier County’s annual Schedule of Capital Improvements for projects within the Rural Golden Gate Estates shall be coordinated with the independent Fire Districts that serve Rural Golden Gate Estates (Fire Districts), public and private utilities, Emergency Medical Services Department and the Collier County Sheriff’s Department to ensure that public project designs are consistent with the needs of these agencies. Policy 6.2.2: Fire Districts, Collier County Emergency Medical Services Department and the Collier County Sheriff’s Department will receive copies of pre-construction plans for capital improvement projects in the Rural Golden Gate Estates and will be invited to review and comment on plans for the public projects. OBJECTIVE 6.3: Maintain and implement public information programs through the Collier County Bureau of Emergency Services, Collier County Sheriff ’s Department, Fire Districts, and other appropriate agencies, to inform residents and visitors of the Greater Golden Gate Area regarding the means to prevent, prepare for, and cope with, man-made and natural disasters. Policy 6.3.1: The Fire Districts that serve the Golden Gate area, and other appropriate agencies, shall embark on an education program to assist residents in knowing and understanding the value and need for prescribed burning on public lands in high risk fire areas. Policy 6.3.2: The Fire Districts, and Collier County Bureau of Emergency Services shall actively promote the Firewise Communities Program through public education in Rural Golden Gate Estates. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 11 of 42 8.A.6 Packet Pg. 163 Attachment: 4 CCPC Adoption Recommendations Rural GGE sub element (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261- 9 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. Policy 6.3.3: The Fire Districts, and the Collier County Bureau of Emergency Services shall hold one or more annual “open house” presentations in the Golden Gate Area emphasizing issues related to wildfires, flooding, emergency access and general emergency management. OBJECTIVE 6.4: Pursue appropriate planning and mitigation measures to address the threat of wildfires in Rural Golden Gate Estates. Policy 6.4.1: Collier County shall evaluate the Land Development Code for Rural Golden Gate Estates and requirements that are found to be inconsistent with acceptable fire prevention standards. This evaluation process shall be coordinated with the Fire Districts, and the Collier County Bureau of Emergency Services. Policy 6.4.2: Within one year of adoption, the County shall begin to evaluate the need to purchase or dedicate parcels within Rural Golden Gate Estates for the purpose of providing staging areas for wildfire prevention activities for the Florida Forest Service, Fire Districts, Collier County or other agency use and will consider whether potential parcels may be used for other public purposes including ride sharing or park and ride facilities allowed by Conditional Use. Policy 6.4.3: The County shall explore annually, options for funding wildfire prevention measures undertaken by the County, Florida Forest Service and/or Fire Districts, including but not limited to Rural Golden Gate Estates Municipal Services Taxing Units (MSTU) revenue, grant funding and general fund revenue. Policy 6.4.4: The County shall review annually and update as necessary, all interlocal agreements and mutual aid agreements to assure coordination of legal, procedural and educational components of wildfire prevention. Policy 6.4.5: County-owned property within Rural Golden Gate Estates shall be subject to an active, on-going management plan to reduce the damage caused by wildfires originating from County-owned properties. [REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 12 of 42 8.A.6 Packet Pg. 164 Attachment: 4 CCPC Adoption Recommendations Rural GGE sub element (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261- 10 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. B. LAND USE DESIGNATION DESCRIPTION SECTION The following section describes the three land use designations shown on the Rural Golden Gate Estates Future Land Use Map. These designations generally indicate the types of land uses for which zoning may be requested. However, these land use designations do not guarantee that a zoning request will be approved. Requests may be denied by the Board of County Commissioners based on criteria in the Land Development Code or in special studies completed for the County. 1. ESTATES DESIGNATION This designation is characterized by low density semi-rural residential lots with limited opportunities for other land uses. Typical lots are 2.25 acres in size. However, there are some legal non-conforming lots as small as 1.14 acres. Residential density is limited to a maximum of one unit per 2.25 gross acres, or one unit per legal non-conforming lot of record, exclusive of guesthouses. Multiple family dwelling units, duplexes, and other structures containing two or more principal dwellings, are prohibited in all Districts and Subdistricts in this Designation. Generally, the Estates Designation also accommodates future non-residential uses, including: a. Conditional uses and essential services as defined in the Land Development Code, except as prohibited in the Neighborhood Center Subdistrict. Also, refer to the Conditional Uses Subdistrict. b. Parks, open space and recreational uses. c. Group Housing shall be permitted subject to the definitions and regulations as outlined in the Collier County Land Development Code (Ordinance No. 04-41, as amended) and consistent with locational requirements in Florida Statutes (Chapter 419.001 F.S.). d. Schools and school facilities in the Estates Designation north of I-75, and where feasible and mutually acceptable, co-locate schools with other public facilities, such as parks, libraries and community centers to the extent possible. Group Housing includes the following type facilities: aa. Family Care Facility if occupied by not more than six (6) persons shall be permitted in residential areas. bb. Group Care Facility, cc. Care Units, dd. Adult Congregate Living Facilities, and ee. Nursing Homes. All of the above uses shall be consistent with all of the Goals, Objectives and Policies of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan. A. Estates ‒ Mixed-Use District 1. Residential Estates Subdistrict Single-family residential development is allowed within this Subdistrict at a maximum density of one unit per 2.25 gross acres, or one unit per legal non-conforming lot of record, exclusive of guesthouses. 2. Neighborhood Center Subdistrict Recognizing the need to provide basic goods, services and amenities to Estates residents, Neighborhood Centers have been designated on the Rural Golden Gate Estates Future Land GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 13 of 42 8.A.6 Packet Pg. 165 Attachment: 4 CCPC Adoption Recommendations Rural GGE sub element (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261- 11 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. Use Map. The Neighborhood Center designation does not guarantee that commercial zoning will be granted. The designation only provides the opportunity to request commercial zoning. a. The Collier County Land Development Code shall be amended to provide rural design criteria to regulate all new commercial development within Neighborhood Centers. b. Locations Neighborhood Centers are located along major roadways and are distributed within Rural Golden Gate Estates according to commercial demand estimates. (See Rural Golden Gate Estates Neighborhood Centers Map). The centers are designed to concentrate all new commercial zoning, and conditional uses, as allowed in the Estates Zoning District, in locations where traffic impacts can be readily accommodated and to avoid strip and disorganized patterns of commercial and conditional use development. Three Neighborhood Centers are established as follows: i. Wilson Boulevard and Golden Gate Boulevard Center. This center consists of three quadrants at the intersection of Wilson and Golden Gate Boulevards_. The NE and SE quadrants of the Center consist of Tract 1 and 2, Unit 14, Tract 17, Unit 13 and the western half of Tract 18, Unit 13 Golden Gate Estates. The NE quadrant of Wilson and Golden Gate Boulevards is approximately 8.45 acres. The parcels within the NE quadrant shall be interconnected and share access to Golden Gate Boulevard and Wilson Boulevard to minimize connections to these two major roadways. The SE quadrant of Wilson and Golden Gate Boulevards is 7.15 acres, allows 5.00 acres of commercial development, and allocates 2.15 acres to project buffering and right-of-way for Golden Gate Boulevard and Wilson Boulevard. The SW quadrant of the Center is approximately 11.78 acres in size and consists of Tract 124, 125, and the north 150 feet of Tract 126, Unit 12 of Golden Gate Estates. ii. Everglades Boulevard and Golden Gate Boulevard Center. This Center consists of all four quadrants at the intersection of Everglades and Golden Gate Boulevards (See Golden Gate Boulevard/Everglades Boulevard Center Map). The NE quadrant of the Center is approximately 5.46 acres in size and consists of Tract 1, Unit 77 of Golden Gate Estates. The SE quadrant of the Center is approximately 5.46 acres in size and consists of Tract 97, Unit 81 of Golden Gate Estates. The NW quadrant of the Center is approximately 5.46 acres in size and consists of Tract 128, Unit 76 of Golden Gate Estates. The SW quadrant of the Center is approximately 5.46 acres in size and consists of Tract 96, Unit 81 of Golden Gate Estates. iii. The Immokalee Road and Everglades Boulevard Center. This Center is located in the southwest and the southeast quadrants of the intersection. This Center consists of three Tracts: Tract 128, Unit 47, is 5.15 + acres and is located within the southwest quadrant of the Center, south of the fire station; and, Tracts 113 and 16, Unit 46, are 4.05 +acres and 5.15 + acres respectively, and are within the southeast quadrant of the Center, east of the fire station. c. Criteria for land uses at the centers are as follows: GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 14 of 42 8.A.6 Packet Pg. 166 Attachment: 4 CCPC Adoption Recommendations Rural GGE sub element (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261- 12 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. i. Commercial uses shall be limited to intermediate commercial so as to provide for a wider variety of goods and services in areas that have a higher degree of automobile traffic. These uses shall be similar to C-1, C-2, or C-3 zoning districts outlined in the Collier County Land Development Code (Ordinance No. 04-41, as amended), except as prohibited below. ii. Parcels immediately adjacent to commercial zoning within the Neighborhood Centers located at the intersections Golden Gate Boulevard and Wilson Boulevard (excluding the SW quadrant), Golden Gate Boulevard and Everglades Boulevard, Everglades Boulevard and Immokalee Road may qualify for Conditional Use under the transitional conditional use provision of the Conditional Uses Subdistrict of this Master Plan Element. iii. A single project shall utilize no more than 50% of the total allowed commercial acreage. This percentage may be increased at the discretion of the Board of County Commissioners. iv. The project shall make provisions for shared parking arrangements with adjoining developments. v. Access points shall be limited to one per 180 feet commencing from the right- of -way of the major intersecting streets of the Neighborhood Center. A maximum of three curb cuts per quadrant shall be allowed. vi. Driveways and curb cuts shall be consolidated with adjoining developments, whenever possible. vii. Driveways accessing parcels on opposite sides of the roadway shall be in direct alignment, except when the roadway median between the two parcels has no opening. viii. Projects shall provide a 25-foot wide landscape buffer abutting the external right-of-way. This buffer shall contain two staggered rows of trees that shall be spaced no more than 30 feet on center, and a double row hedge at least 24 inches in height at time of planting and attaining a minimum of three feet height within one year. A minimum of 50% of the 25-foot wide buffer area shall be comprised of a meandering bed of shrubs and ground covers other than grass. Existing native trees must be retained within this 25-foot wide buffer area to aid in achieving this buffer requirement; other existing native vegetation shall be retained, where possible, to aid in achieving this buffer requirement. Water retention/detention areas shall be allowed in this buffer area if left in natural state, and drainage conveyance through the buffer area shall be allowed if necessary to reach an external outfall. a. All buildings shall have tile roofs, ‘Old Style Florida’ metal roofs, or decorative parapet walls above the roofline. The buildings shall be finished in light, subdued colors, except for decorative trim. ix. Building heights shall be limited to one (1) story, with a maximum height of thirty- five (35) feet. _ x. All lighting facilities shall be architecturally–designed, and shall be limited to a height of twenty-five (25) feet. Such lighting facilities shall be shielded from neighboring residential land uses and consistent with Policy 5.2.4. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 15 of 42 8.A.6 Packet Pg. 167 Attachment: 4 CCPC Adoption Recommendations Rural GGE sub element (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261- 13 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. xi. Commercial uses shall encourage pedestrian traffic through placement of sidewalks, pedestrian walkways, and marked crosswalks within parking areas. Adjacent projects shall coordinate placement of sidewalks so that a continuous pathway through the Neighborhood Center is created. xii. All buildings and projects within any single specific quadrant of the Subdistrict shall utilize a common architectural theme. This theme shall be applicable to both building design and signage. xiii. No building footprint shall exceed 5,000 square feet, unless the project is submitted in the form of a PUD. Walkways or courtyards shall connect adjacent buildings. _ xiv. Drive-through establishments shall be limited to banks, with no more than 3 lanes; the drive-through areas shall be architecturally integrated with the rest of the building. _ xv. Fences or walls may be constructed on the commercial side of the required landscape buffer between adjacent commercial and residential uses. If constructed, such fences or walls shall not exceed five (5) feet in height. Walls shall be constructed of brick or stone. Fences shall be of wood or concrete post or rail types, and shall be of open design (not covered by slats, boards or wire). xvi. Projects directly abutting residential property (property zoned E-Estates and without an approved conditional use) shall provide, at a minimum, a seventy-five (75) feet wide buffer in which no parking uses are permitted. Twenty-five (25) feet of the width of the buffer along the developed area shall be a landscape buffer. A minimum of fifty (50) feet of the buffer width shall consist of retained native vegetation and must be consistent with subsection 3.05.07H. of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC). The native vegetation retention area may consist of a perimeter berm and be used for water management detention. Any newly constructed berm shall be revegetated to meet subsection 3.05.07H. of the LDC (native vegetation replanting requirements). Additionally, in order to be considered for approval, use of the native vegetation retention area for water management purposes shall meet the following criteria: a. There shall be no adverse impacts to the native vegetation being retained. The additional water directed to this area shall not increase the annual hydro-period unless it is proven that such would have no adverse impact to the existing vegetation. b. If the project requires permitting by the South Florida Water Management District, the project shall provide a letter or official document from the District indicating that the native vegetation within the retention area will not have to be removed to comply with water management requirements. If the District cannot or will not supply such a letter, then the native vegetation retention area shall not be used for water management. c. If the project is reviewed by Collier County, the County engineer shall provide evidence that no removal of native vegetation is necessary to facilitate the necessary storage of water in the water management area. xix. Projects within the Neighborhood Center Subdistrict that are submitted as PUDs shall provide a functional public open-space component. Such public open-space shall be developed as green space within a pedestrian-accessible courtyard, as per Section 4.06.03B. of the GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 16 of 42 8.A.6 Packet Pg. 168 Attachment: 4 CCPC Adoption Recommendations Rural GGE sub element (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261- 14 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. Collier County Land Development Code, as in effect at the time of P.U.D. approval. xx. The following principal permitted uses are prohibited within Neighborhood Centers: a. Drinking Places (5813) and Liquor Stores (5921) b. Mail Order Houses (5961) c. Merchandizing Machine Operators (5962) d. Power Laundries (7211) e. Crematories (7261) (Does not include non-crematory Funeral Parlors) f. Radio, TV Representatives (7313) and Direct Mail Advertising Services (7331) g. NEC Recreational Shooting Ranges, Waterslides, etc. (7999) h. General Hospitals (8062), Psychiatric Hospitals (8063), and Specialty Hospitals (8069) i. Elementary and Secondary Schools (8211), Colleges (8221), Junior Colleges (8222) j. Libraries (8231) k. Correctional Institutions (9223) l. Waste Management (9511) m. Homeless Shelters and Soup Kitchens. xxi. The following additional restrictions and standards apply to Tract 124 and the north 150 feet of Tract 126, within the southwest quadrant of the Wilson Boulevard and Golden Gate Boulevard Center: a. Commercial uses shall be limited to the following: 1. medical offices and clinics and professional offices, except surveyors; and, 2. medical related uses, such as a wellness center. b. The ordinance rezoning this property to allow commercial uses shall include the following requirements: 1. no less than sixty percent (60%) of the gross square footage shall be designated for medical offices and clinics; and, 2. parking for the entire project shall be that required for medical office or clinic use by the Land Development Code (Ordinance No. 04-41, as amended), so as to allow 100 percent medical office use. c. Parking lot lighting shall be restricted to bollards except as may be required to comply with lighting standards in the Land Development Code (Ordinance No. 04-41, as amended) and other governing regulations. d. The Neighborhood Center boundaries of this quadrant shall not be further expanded. 3. Conditional Uses Subdistrict Various types of conditional uses are permitted in the Estates zoning district within the Rural Golden Gate Estates area. In order to control the location and spacing of new conditional uses, one of the following four sets of criteria shall be met: GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 17 of 42 8.A.6 Packet Pg. 169 Attachment: 4 CCPC Adoption Recommendations Rural GGE sub element (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261- 15 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. a. Essential Services Conditional Use Provisions: Those Essential Services Conditional Uses, as identified within Section 2.01.03 G. of the Collier County Land Development Code, may be allowed anywhere within the Estates Zoning District, except as prohibited in certain Neighborhood Centers, and are described as: 1. electric or gas generating plants, 2. effluent tanks, 3. major re-pump stations, 4. sewage treatment plants, including percolation ponds, 5. hospitals and hospices, 6. water aeration or treatment plants, 7. governmental facilities (except for those Permitted Uses identified in Section 2.01.03 of the Land Development Code), 8. public water supply acquisition, withdrawal, or extraction facilities, and 9. public safety service facilities, and other similar facilities. b. Neighborhood Center Transitional Conditional Use Provisions: Conditional uses shall be allowed immediately adjacent to designated Neighborhood Centers subject to the following criteria: 1. Properties eligible for conditional uses shall abut the arterial or collector road serving the Neighborhood Center, 2. Such uses shall be limited to transitional conditional uses that are compatible with both residential and commercial such as neighborhood churches, social or fraternal organizations, childcare centers, schools, and group care facilities, 3. All conditional uses shall make provisions for shared parking arrangements with adjoining developments whenever possible, 4. Conditional uses abutting Estates zoned property shall provide, at a minimum, a 75-foot buffer of native vegetation in which no parking or water management uses are permitted, 5. Conditional uses adjoining the commercial uses within Neighborhood Centers shall, whenever possible, share parking areas, access and curb cuts with the adjoining commercial use, in order to facilitate traffic movement. c. Transitional Conditional Uses: Conditional uses may be granted in Transitional Areas. A Transitional Area is defined as an area located between existing non-residential and residential areas. The purpose of this provision is to allow conditional uses in areas that are adjacent to existing non-residential uses and are therefore generally not appropriate for residential use. The conditional use will act as a buffer between non-residential and residential areas. The following criteria shall apply for Transitional Conditional Use requests: 1. Site shall be directly adjacent to a non-residential use (zoned or developed); 2. Site shall be 2.25 acres, or more, in size or be at least 150 feet in width and shall not exceed 5 acres; 3. Site abutting Estates zoned property without an approved conditional use shall provide, at a minimum, a 75-foot buffer of native vegetation in which no parking or water management uses are permitted; 4. Site shall not be adjacent to a church, neighborhood church or other place of worship, school, social or fraternal organization, child care center, convalescent GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 18 of 42 8.A.6 Packet Pg. 170 Attachment: 4 CCPC Adoption Recommendations Rural GGE sub element (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261- 16 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. home, hospice, rest home, home for the aged, adult foster home, children's home, rehabilitation centers; 5. Site shall not be adjacent to parks or open space and recreational uses; and 6. Site shall not be adjacent to permitted (by right) Essential Service uses, as identified in Section 2.01.03 of the Land Development Code, except may be located adjacent to libraries and museums. d. Special Exceptions to Conditional Use Locational Criteria: 1. Temporary use (TU) permits for model homes, as defined in the Collier County Land Development Code, may be allowed anywhere within the Estates-Mixed Use District. Conditional use permits for the purpose of extending the time period for use of the structure as a model home shall be required, and shall be subject to the provisions of Section 5.04.04.B. and C. of the Collier County Land Development Code, Ordinance No. 04-41, as amended. Such conditional uses shall not be subject to the locational criteria of the Conditional Uses Subdistrict, and may be allowed anywhere within the Estates-Mixed Use District. 2. Conditional Use permits for excavation, as provided for in the Estates zoning district, are not subject to the locational criteria for Conditional Uses and may be allowed anywhere within the Estates-Mixed Use District. 3. Conditional Use for a church or place of worship, as provided for in the Estates zoning district, is allowed on Tract 22, Golden Gate Estates, Unit 97 (See Special Exception to Conditional Use Location Criteria Map). 4. Conditional Use for a cellular tower be allowed anywhere in the Estates Zoning District only on parcels no smaller than 2.25 acres and adjacent to a roadway classified within the Transportation Element as a Collector or Arterial. 4. Mission Subdistrict The Mission Subdistrict is located on the south side of Oil Well Road, approximately one - quarter mile west of Everglades Boulevard, and consists of 21.72 acres. The purpose of this Subdistrict is to provide for churches and related uses, including community outreach. The following uses are allowed: a. Churches. b. Child care centers – must be not-for-profit and affiliated with a church within the Subdistrict. c. Private schools – must be not-for-profit and affiliated with a church within the Subdistrict. d. Individual and family social services (activity centers, elderly or handicapped only; day care centers, adult and handicapped only) – must be not-for-profit and affiliated with a church within the Subdistrict. e. Medical outreach to the community, to include activities such as administering influenza vaccine, checking blood pressure, and conducting blood donation drives – must be not-for-profit and affiliated with a church within the Subdistrict. Soup kitchens and homeless shelters are prohibited in this Subdistrict. The maximum total floor area allowed in this Subdistrict is 90,000 square feet. The maximum height of buildings shall be 30 feet zoned height, except the worship center shall be permitted a zoned height of 35 feet. Development in this Subdistrict shall be designed to be compatible with the existing, and allowed future, development in the surrounding area. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 19 of 42 8.A.6 Packet Pg. 171 Attachment: 4 CCPC Adoption Recommendations Rural GGE sub element (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261- 17 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. In the alternate to the foregoing uses, measures of development intensity, and development standards, this Subdistrict may be developed with single family dwellings in accordance with the Residential Estates Subdistrict. Property adjacent to this Subdistrict shall not qualify for the Transitional Conditional Use. 5. Everglades – Randall Subdistrict The Everglades – Randall Subdistrict is located on the northeast corner of Everglades Boulevard and Randall Boulevard, consists of 7.8 acres, and comprises Tract 115 and the east 150 feet of Tract 116, Unit 69, Golden Gate Estates. The purpose of this Subdistrict is to provide for churches and other places of worship and their related uses. The following use is permitted within the Subdistrict through the conditional use process: a. Churches and other places of worship The following church-related uses are prohibited within the Subdistrict: a. Day care centers b. Private schools c. Soup kitchens d. Homeless shelters The maximum total floor area allowed in this Subdistrict is 20,000 square feet, including no more than 230 seats. The maximum height of buildings shall be 30 feet. Architectural features such as steeples may be a maximum height of 60 feet. For access drives, a throat depth of no less than 30 feet, measured from the roadway edge of the pavement, shall be provided. B. Estates – Commercial District 1. Randall Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict The Randall Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict, containing approximately 56.5 acres, is located on the south side of Randall Boulevard and Immokalee Road (CR-846), extending from 8th Street NE west to the Corkscrew Canal. This Subdistrict is comprised of the following properties: Tracts 54, 55, 71, 72, 89, 90, 107, 108, 125, 126 and 127, Golden G ate Estates, Unit 23. This Subdistrict has been designated on the Rural Golden Gate Estates Future Land Use Map and the Randall Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict Map. It is the intent of this Subdistrict to provide commercial goods and services to the surrounding area. All development in the Subdistrict shall comply with the following requirements and limitations: a. All development is encouraged to be in the form of a PUD. b. Projects directly abutting Estates zoned property shall provide, at a minimum, a 75- foot wide buffer of retained native vegetation in which no parking or water management uses are permitted; except that, when abutting conditional uses no such buffer is required. c. Shared parking shall be required with adjoining development whenever possible. d. Tract 55 shall only be utilized for native preservation and water management areas. e. The eastern boundary of Tract 55 shall contain, at a minimum, a 50-foot wide retained native vegetation buffer. f. The following limitation shall apply to Tract 71 only: 1. Limitation of Uses – Uses shall be limited to the following: a. Automobile Service Station; b. Barber & Beauty Shops; c. Convenience Stores; GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 20 of 42 8.A.6 Packet Pg. 172 Attachment: 4 CCPC Adoption Recommendations Rural GGE sub element (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261- 18 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. d. Drug Stores; e. Food Markets; f. Hardware Stores; g. Laundries – Self Service Only; h. Parks, Public or Private; i. Post Offices and Professional Offices; j. Repair Shops – Radio, TV, Small Appliances and Shoes; k. Restaurants, including fast food restaurants but not drive in restaurants; l. All Permitted Uses of the C-2, Convenience Commercial, zoning district in the Collier County Land Development Code, Ordinance No. 04-41, as amended as of April 14, 2009; and, m. Veterinary Clinic with no outside kenneling; g. The following limitations shall apply to Tracts 72, 89, 90, 107, 108, 125, 126, 127, and Tract 54: 1. Development intensity on Tracts 72, 89, 90, 107, 108, 125, 126, 127 and the west one-half of Tract 54 shall be limited to 360,950 square feet of floor area, of which no more than 285,950 square feet shall be retail development. 2. Development intensity on the east one-half of Tract 54 shall be limited to 20,000 square feet of commercial development. 3. The first phase of the project development, exclusive of the existing 20,000 sq. ft. of development on the east one-half of Tract 54, shall include a grocery anchor, with a minimum of 35,000 square feet of gross leasable floor area, prior to any certificates of occupancy being issued beyond 100,000 square feet of commercial development. 4. Allowable uses shall be limited to the permitted and conditional uses of the C-4, General Commercial District in the Collier County Land Development Code in effect as of the effective date of the adoption of the amendment of this Subdistr ict [Ordinance No. 2010 -32, adopted July 28, 2010], except that the following uses, as identified with a number from the Standard Industrial Classification Manual, shall be prohibited: a. Tire Dealers, Automotive Retail (Group 5531) b. Automotive Parking (Group 7521) c. Communication Services (Group 4899) d. Drinking Places (Group 5813) e. Fishing Piers (Group 7999) f. Glass and Glazing work (Group 1793) g. Health Services (Groups 8059 - 8069) h. Specialty Outpatient Facilities (Group 8093) i. Houseboat Rental, Lakes Operations, Party and Pleasure Boat rental (Group 7999) j. Large Appliance repair service (Group 7623) k. Marinas (Group 4493 and 4499) l. Miscellaneous Repair Services (Groups 7622-7641, 7699) m. Liquor Store, unless operated by a Grocery Retailer (Group 5921) n. Used Merchandise Store (Group 5932) GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 21 of 42 8.A.6 Packet Pg. 173 Attachment: 4 CCPC Adoption Recommendations Rural GGE sub element (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261- 19 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. o. Automatic Merchandising Machine Operators (Group 5962) p. Direct Selling Establishment (Group 5963) q. Escort Services, Massage Parlors, Tattoo Parlors, Turkish Baths, Wedding Chapels (Group 7299) r. Betting Information Services, Bath Houses, Billiard Parlors, Bookies and Bookmakers, Cable lifts, Carnival Operation, Circus Companies, Fortune Tellers, Go-cart racing operation, Off-track betting, Ping Pong Parlors, Rodeo Animal Rentals, Rodeos, Shooting Ranges, Trapshooting Facilities (Group 7999) s. Parole offices, Probation offices, Public welfare centers, refugee services, settlement houses (Group 8322) t. Tow-in parking lots (Groups 7514, 7515, 7521) u. Animal Specialty Services (Group 0752) 5. At time of rezoning, consideration shall be given to imposing appropriate restrictions on the amount of development allowed in this Subdistrict prior to discontinuance and relocation of the Big Corkscrew Island Fire Station and Florida Division of Forestry fire tower uses. 6. All buildings on Tracts 72, 89, 90, 107, 108, 125, 126 and 127 shall be developed with a unified architectural theme. 7. Excluding the commercial zoning on Tract 71 and the existing approved commercial zoning on the east one-half of Tract 54, any additional development in the Subdistrict shall be developed in phases. Phase I shall be limited to 100,000 square feet of gross leasable floor area. Subsequent phases shall not receive building permits until the Randall Boulevard/Immokalee Road intersection project, including the widening of the segment of Randall Boulevard abutting the Subdistrict, as shown on Exhibit “A” of the Developer Contribution Agreement adopted July 28, 2010 by the Board of County Commissioners, has commenced. No Certificates of Occupancy shall be issued for subsequent development phases until the Randall Boulevard/Immokalee Road intersection project is substantially complete. Neither the building permits limitations nor the Certificates of Occupancy limitations shall apply if satisfactory alternative mitigation is approved by the Board of County Commissioners pursuant to Transportation Element Policy 5.1, or if traffic conditions change in such a manner that adequate capacity is available. 2. Estates Shopping Center Subdistrict Recognizing the need to provide for centrally located basic goods and services within a portion Northern Golden Gate Estates, the Estates Shopping Center Subdistrict has been designated on the Rural Golden Gate Estates Future Land Use Map. The Subdistrict is located at the NW corner of Golden Gate Boulevard and Wilson Boulevard westward to 3rd Street NW and extending northward to include the southern 180 feet of Tracts 142 and 106 of Unit 11 and the southern 255 feet of Tract 111 of Unit 11 of Golden Gate Estates, totaling approximately 41 acres. The Estates Shopping Center Subdistrict is intended to provide convenient shopping, personal services and employment for the central areas of Northern Golden Gate Estates. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 22 of 42 8.A.6 Packet Pg. 174 Attachment: 4 CCPC Adoption Recommendations Rural GGE sub element (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261- 20 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. Commercial development in this Subdistrict will reduce driving distances for many residents, assist in minimizing the road network required, and reduce traffic impacts in this area of Collier County. All development in this Subdistrict shall comply with the following requirements and limitations: a. Allowable Uses, as identified with a number from the Standard Industrial Classification Manual, shall be limited to the following: 1. Amusement and recreation Groups 7911 – Dance studios, schools and halls, excluding discotheques 7991 – Physical fitness facilities 7999 – Amusement and recreation services, not elsewhere classified, allowing only day camps, gymnastics instruction, judo/karate instruction, sporting goods rental and yoga instruction 2. Apparel and accessory stores (no adult oriented sales) Groups 5611 – Men’s and boys’ clothing and accessory stores 5621 – Women’s clothing stores 5632 – Women’s accessory and specialty stores 5641 – Children’s and infants’ wear stores 5651 – Family clothing stores 5661 – Shoe stores 5699 – Miscellaneous apparel and accessory stores 3. Automotive dealers and gasoline service stations Groups 5531 – Auto and home supply stores 4. Automotive repair, services and parking (No outdoor repair/service. All repairs/services to be performed by authorized automotive technician.) Groups 7514 – Passenger car rental 5. Building materials, hardware, garden supply, and mobile home dealers Groups 5231 – Paint, glass, and wallpaper stores 5251 – Hardware stores 5261 – Retail nurseries, lawn and garden supply stores 6. Business services Groups 7334 – Photocopying and duplicating services 7335 – Commercial photography 7336 – Commercial art and graphic design 7338 – Secretarial and court reporting services 7342 – Disinfecting and pest control services 7352 – Medical equipment rental and leasing 7359 – Equipment rental and leasing, not elsewhere classified, excluding the following uses: airplane rental and leasing; coin operated machine rental and leasing; industrial truck rental and leasing; oil field equipment rental and leasing; oil well drilling equipment rental; leasing; toilets, portable – rental and leasing; and vending machines – rental only 7371 – Computer programming services GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 23 of 42 8.A.6 Packet Pg. 175 Attachment: 4 CCPC Adoption Recommendations Rural GGE sub element (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261- 21 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. 7372 – Prepackaged software 7373 – Computer integrated systems design 7374 – Computer processing and data preparation and processing services 7375 – Information retrieval services 7376 – Computer facilities management services 7379 – Computer related services, not elsewhere classified 7382 – Security systems services 7383 – News syndicates 7384 – Photofinishing laboratories 7389 – Business services, not elsewhere classified 7. Communications Groups 4812 – Radiotelephone communications 4841 – Cable and other pay television services 8. Construction, special trade contractors (office use only, no on-site materials or equipment storage) Groups 1711 – Plumbing, heating and air-conditioning 1721 – Painting and paper hanging industry 1731 – Electrical work industry 1741 – Masonry, stone setting, and other stone work 1742 – Plastering, drywall, acoustical, and insulation work 1743 – Terrazzo, tile, marble, and mosaic work industry 1751 – Carpentry work 1752 – Floor laying and other floor work, not elsewhere classified industry 1761 – Roofing, siding, and sheet metal work industry 1771 – Concrete work industry 1781 – Water well drilling industry 1791 – Structural steel erection 1793 – Glass and glazing work 1794 – Excavation work 1795 – Wrecking and demolition work 1796 – Installation or erection of building equipment, not elsewhere 1799 – Special trade contractors, not elsewhere classified 9. Depository institutions Groups 6021 – National commercial banks 6022 – State commercial banks 6029 – Commercial banks, not elsewhere classified 6035 – Savings institutions, federally chartered 6036 – Savings Institutions, not federally chartered 6061 – Credit unions, federally chartered 6062 – Credit unions, not federally chartered 6091 – Non-deposit trust facilities GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 24 of 42 8.A.6 Packet Pg. 176 Attachment: 4 CCPC Adoption Recommendations Rural GGE sub element (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261- 22 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. 6099 – Functions related to depository banking, not elsewhere classified 10. Eating and drinking places (Group 5812, including only liquor service accessory to the restaurant use, no outdoor music or televisions, and no windows or walls open to the outside, except as required by code) 11. Engineering, accounting, research, management, and related services Groups 8711 – Engineering services 8712 – Architectural services 8713 – Surveying services 8721 – Accounting, auditing, and bookkeeping services 8741 – Management services 8742 – Management consulting services 8743 – Public relations services 8748 – Business consulting services, not elsewhere classified 12. Executive, legislative, and general government, except finance Groups 9111 – Executive offices 9121 – Legislative bodies 9131 – Executive and legislative offices combined 9199 – General government, not elsewhere classified 13. Food stores Groups 5411 – Grocery stores (minimum 27,000 square feet) 5421 – Meat and fish (seafood) markets, including freezer provisioners 5431 – Fruit and vegetable markets 5441 – Candy, nut, and confectionery stores 5451 – Dairy products stores 5461 – Retail bakeries 5499 – Miscellaneous food stores, including convenience stores with fuel pumps and carwash 14. General merchandise stores Groups 5311 – Department stores 5331 – Variety stores 5399 – Miscellaneous general merchandise stores 15. Home furniture, furnishings, and equipment stores Groups 5712 – Furniture stores 5713 – Floor covering stores 5714 – Drapery, curtain, and upholstery stores 5719 – Miscellaneous home furnishings stores 5722 – Household appliance stores 5731 – Radio, television, and consumer electronics stores 5734 – Computer and computer software stores 5735 – Record and prerecorded tape stores (no adult oriented sales) 5736 – Musical instrument store GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 25 of 42 8.A.6 Packet Pg. 177 Attachment: 4 CCPC Adoption Recommendations Rural GGE sub element (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261- 23 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. 16. Insurance carriers Groups 6311 – Life insurance 6321 – Accident and health insurance 6324 – Hospital and medical service plans 6331 – Fire, marine, and casualty insurance 6351 – Surety insurance 6361 – Title insurance 6371 – Pension, health and welfare funds 6399 – Insurance carriers, not elsewhere classified 6411 – Insurance agents 17. Justice, public order and safety Groups 9221 – Police protection 9222 – Legal counsel and prosecution 9229 – Public order and safety, not elsewhere classified 18. Meeting and banquet rooms 19. Miscellaneous retail (no adult oriented sales) Groups 5912 – Drug stores and proprietary stores 5921 – Liquor stores (accessory to grocery or pharmacy only) 5932 – Used merchandise stores 5941 – Sporting goods stores and bicycle shops 5942 – Book stores 5943 – Stationery stores 5944 – Jewelry stores, including repair 5945 – Hobby, toy, and game shops 5946 – Camera and photographic supply stores 5947 – Gift, novelty, and souvenir shops 5948 – Luggage and leather goods stores 5949 – Sewing, needlework, and piece goods stores 5992 – Florists 5993 – Tobacco stores and stands 5994 – News dealers and newsstands 5995 – Optical goods stores 5999 – Miscellaneous retail stores, not elsewhere classified (excluding gravestone, tombstones, auction rooms, monuments, swimming pools, and sales barns) 20. Non-depository credit institutions Groups 6111 – Federal and federally-sponsored credit agencies 6141 – Personal credit institutions 6153 – Short-term business credit institutions, except agricultural 6159 – Miscellaneous business credit institutions 6162 – Mortgage bankers and loan correspondents 6163 – Loan brokers 21. Offices and clinics of dentist (Group 8021) GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 26 of 42 8.A.6 Packet Pg. 178 Attachment: 4 CCPC Adoption Recommendations Rural GGE sub element (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261- 24 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. 22. Personal services Groups 7212 – Garment pressing, and agents for laundries and drycleaners 7221 – Photographic studios, portrait 7231 – Beauty shops 7241 – Barber shops 7251 – Shoe repair shops and shoeshine parlors 7291 – Tax return preparation services 7299 – Miscellaneous personal services, not elsewhere classified, excluding massage parlors, Turkish baths and escort services 23. Public finance, taxation, and monetary policy (Group 9311) 24. Real Estate Groups 6512 – Operators of nonresidential buildings 6513 – Operators of apartment buildings 6514 – Operators of dwellings other than apartment buildings 6515 – Operators of residential mobile home sites 6517 – Lessors of railroad property 6519 – Lessors of real property, not elsewhere classified 6531 – Real estate agents and managers 6541 – Title abstract offices 6552 – Land subdividers and developers, except cemeteries 25. Schools and educational services, not elsewhere classified (Group 8299) 26. Security and commodity brokers, dealers, exchanges, and services Groups 6211 – Security brokers, dealers, and flotation companies 6221 – Commodity contracts brokers and dealers 6231 – Security and commodity exchanges 6282 – Investment advice 6289 – Services allied with the exchange of securities or commodities, not elsewhere classified 27. Social services Groups 8322 – Individual and family social services (adult day care centers only) 8351 – Child day care services 28. Travel agencies (Group 4724) 29. Veterinary services for animal specialties (Group 0742, excluding outside kenneling) 30. Video tape rental (Group 7841, excluding adult oriented sales and rentals) 31. United states postal service (Group 4311, excluding major distribution centers) 32. Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals (“BZA”) by the process outlined in the LDC. b. Accessory Uses: GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 27 of 42 8.A.6 Packet Pg. 179 Attachment: 4 CCPC Adoption Recommendations Rural GGE sub element (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261- 25 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including, but not limited to: 1. Utility buildings (including water and wastewater plants) which shall be enclosed 2. Essential service facilities 3. Gazebos, statuary and other architectural features 4. Utilities, water and wastewater facilities and/or plants (all processing plants must be enclosed) 5. Alcohol service for outdoor dining shall only be accessory to food service c. Operational Standards 1. Outdoor music is prohibited d. The following uses, as identified with a number from the Standard Industrial Classification Manual, shall be prohibited: 1. Amusement and recreation services, not elsewhere classified (Group 7999, except those uses expressly listed above in a.1 are permitted) 2. Air and water resource and solid waste management (Group 9511) 3. Business Services Groups 7313 – Radio, television, and publishers’ advertising representatives 7331 – Direct mail advertising services 4. Correctional Institutions (Group 9223) 5. Drinking places (alcoholic beverages) (Group 5813) 6. Educational services Groups 8211 – Elementary and secondary schools 8221 – Colleges, universities, and professional schools 8222 – Junior colleges and technical institutes 8231 – Libraries 7. Health services Groups 8062 – General medical and surgical hospitals 8063 – Psychiatric hospitals 8069 – Specialty hospitals, except psychiatric 8. Miscellaneous Retail Groups 5921 – Liquor stores 5961 – Catalog and mail-order houses 5962 – Automatic merchandising machine operators 9. Personal services Groups 7211 – Power Laundries, family and commercial 7261 – Funeral service and crematories 10. Social services Groups 8322 – Individual and family social services, excluding adult day care centers 8361 – Residential care, including soup kitchens and homeless shelters e. Development intensity shall be limited to 190,000 square feet of gross leasable floor area. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 28 of 42 8.A.6 Packet Pg. 180 Attachment: 4 CCPC Adoption Recommendations Rural GGE sub element (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261- 26 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. f. No commercial use shall exceed fifteen thousand (15,000) square feet, except for a single grocery store use between twenty-seven thousand (27,000) and sixty thousand (60,000) square feet in size, a single commercial use of up to thirty thousand (30,000) square feet in size, and a single commercial use of up to twenty thousand (20,000) square feet in size. g. No building may exceed 30,000 square feet in size, except for the grocery anchored building with inline stores. h. Development within this Subdistrict shall be phased and the following commitments related to area roadway improvements shall be completed within the specified timeframes: 1. Right-of-Way for Golden Gate Boulevard Expansion and Right-of-Way for the Wilson Boulevard Expansion will be donated to the County at no cost within 120 days of a written request from the County. 2. The owner will pay its fair share for the intersection improvements at Wilson Boulevard and Golden Gate Boulevard within 90 days of County request for reimbursement. 3. Until the intersection improvements at Golden Gate Boulevard and Wilson Boulevard are complete, the County shall not issue a Certificate(s) of Occupancy (CO) for more than 100,000 square feet of development. The applicant must obtain a C.O. for a grocery store as part of this 100,000 square feet, and the grocery store must be the first C.O. obtained. i. Rezoning is encouraged to be in the form of a Planned Unit Development (PUD), and the rezone ordinance must contain development standards to ensure that all commercial land uses will be compatible with neighboring residential uses. This subdistrict includes a conceptual plan, which identifies the location of the permitted development area and required preserve area for this subdistrict. The preserve area depicted on the conceptual plan shall satisfy all comprehensive plan requirements for retained native vegetation, including but not limited to the requirements of Policy 6.1.1 of the CCME. A more detailed development plan must be developed and utilized for the required PUD rezoning. j. Development standards, including permitted uses and setbacks for principal buildings shall be established at the time of PUD rezoning. Any future PUD rezone shall include at a minimum: 1. Landscape buffers adjacent to external rights-of-way shall be: a. 1st/3rd Streets ‒ Minimum 30’ wide enhanced buffer b. Wilson Boulevard ‒ Minimum 25’ wide enhanced buffer c. Golden Gate Boulevard ‒ Minimum 50’ wide enhanced buffer 2. Except for the utility building, no commercial building may be constructed within 125 feet of the northern property boundary and within 300’ of the 3rd Street NW boundary of this subdistrict. 3. Any portion of the Project directly abutting residential property (property zoned E-Estates and without an approved conditional use) shall provide, at a minimum, a seventy-five (75) feet wide buffer, except the westernmost 330’ of Tract 106, GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 29 of 42 8.A.6 Packet Pg. 181 Attachment: 4 CCPC Adoption Recommendations Rural GGE sub element (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261- 27 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. which shall provide a minimum 20’ wide buffer in which no parking uses are permitted. Twenty-five (25) feet of the width of the buffer along the developed area shall be a landscape buffer. A minimum of fifty (50) feet of the buffer width shall consist of retained or re-planted native vegetation and must be consistent with subsection 3.05.07.H of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC). The native vegetation retention area may consist of a perimeter berm and be used for water management detention. Any newly constructed berm shall be revegetated to meet subsection 3.05.07.H of the LDC (native vegetation replanting requirements). Additionally, in order to be considered for approval, use of the native vegetation retention area for water management purposes shall meet the following criteria: a. There shall be no adverse impacts to the native vegetation being retained. The additional water directed to this area shall not increase the annual hydro- period unless it is proven that such would have no adverse impact to the existing vegetation. b. If the project requires permitting by the South Florida Water Management District, the project shall provide a letter or official document from the District indicating that the native vegetation within the retention area will not have to be removed to comply with water management requirements. If the District cannot or will not supply such a letter, then the native vegetation retention area shall not be used for water management. c. If the project is reviewed by Collier County, the developer’s engineer shall provide evidence that no removal of native vegetation is necessary to facilitate the necessary storage of water in the water management area. 2. AGRICULTURAL/RURAL DESIGNATION A. Rural Settlement Area District This area consists of Sections 13, 14, 23 and 24, and a portion of 22, Township 48 South, Range 27 East (the former North Golden Gate Subdivision), which was zoned and platted between 1967 and 1970. In settlement of a lawsuit pertaining to the permitted uses of this property, this property has been “vested” for the types of land uses specified in that certain “PUD” by Settlement Zoning granted by the County as referenced in that certain SETTLEMENT AND ZONING AGREEMENT dated the 27th day of January 1986. Twenty-one hundred (2,100) dwelling units and twenty-two (22) acres of neighborhood commercial uses and hotel/motel use are “vested”. This area is now comprised of the Orange Tree PUD and Orange Blossom Ranch PUD, and the types of uses permitted in this District include residential, earth mining, commercial, agricultural, community facility, community uses, education facilities, religious facilities, golf course, open space and recreational uses, and essential service uses. By designation in the Growth Management Plan and the Golden Gate Area Master Plan as Settlement Area, the Plan recognizes the property as an area which, while outside of the Urban Designation, is appropriate for the following types of uses: residential, earth mining, commercial, agricultural, community facility, community uses, education facilities, religious facilities, golf course, open space and recreational, and essential services. Future zoning changes to add dwelling units or commercial acreage within the geographic boundaries of this District will not be prohibited or discouraged by reason of the above-referenced vested status. The geographic expansion of the Settlement Area to additional lands outside the areas covered by Sections 13, 14, 23 and 24, and a portion of 22, Township 48 South, Range 27 East (the former North Golden Gate Subdivision), shall be prohibited. The Settlement Area Land GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 30 of 42 8.A.6 Packet Pg. 182 Attachment: 4 CCPC Adoption Recommendations Rural GGE sub element (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261- 28 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. Use District is limited to the area described above and shall not be available as a land use district for any other property in the County. 3. OVERLAYS AND SPECIAL FEATURES A. Southern Golden Gate Estates Natural Resource Protection Overlay Southern Golden Gate Estates is identified as a Natural Resource Protection Area (NRPA) Overlay on the Rural Golden Gate Estates Future Land Use Map and is subject to the NRPA Overlay provisions of the FLUE. C. List of Maps Rural Golden Gate Estates Future Land Use Map Rural Golden Gate Estates Neighborhood Centers Wilson Boulevard/Golden Gate Boulevard Center Golden Gate Boulevard/Everglades Boulevard Center Immokalee Road/Everglades Boulevard Center Randall Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict Mission Subdistrict Estates Shopping Center Subdistrict Estates Shopping Center Subdistrict Conceptual Plan Everglades – Randall Subdistrict Immokalee Road/Randall Boulevard Planning Study Area GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 31 of 42 8.A.6 Packet Pg. 183 Attachment: 4 CCPC Adoption Recommendations Rural GGE sub element (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261- COLLIER BLVDCOLLIER BLVDTA MIA MIT R L E INTERSTATE 75 INTERSTATE 75I-75I-75RANDALL BLVD C.R. 951IMMOKALEE RD C.R. 951S.R. 84 EVERGLADES BLVD SDESOTO BLVD SVANDERBILT BEACH RD IMMOKALEE RD OIL WEL L RD COLLIER BLVDLIVINGSTON RDDAVIS BLVD PIN E R I D GE R D EVERGLADES BLVD NRADIO RD G.G . P KW Y DESOTO BLVD SLOGAN BLVD NSANTA BARBARA BLVDDESOTO BLVD NVANDERBILT BEACH RD GOLDE N GATE BLV D EVERGLADES BLVD SGOLDE N GATE BLV D GREEN BLVD RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK RD WILSON BLVD COUNTY BARN RDT51ST50ST49ST48ST47SR 26 E R 27 E R 28 E R 29 E RURAL GOLDEN GATEFUTURE LAND USE MAP 0 1 2 30.5 Miles PREPARED BY: BETH YANG, AICPGROWTH MANAG EMENT DEPT.DATE: 2 /2019FILE: RURAL G OLDEN G ATE ESTATES FLU MAP.MXD ° RURAL GOLDEN GATE ESTATESFUTURE LAND USE MAP AGRICULTURAL / RURAL DESIGNATION Sou thern Golden Ga te Estates Natu ra lResource Protection Area O verlay OVERLAYS AND SPECIAL FEAT URES ESTAT ES DESIGNATION MIXED USE DISTRICT Residentia l Estates Subdist rict Neig hborhood Center Subd istrict Rural Sett lement Area District Conditional Uses Subdistrict COMMERCIAL DISTRICT Mission Subdistrict Everglades-Randa ll Subdistrict Randa ll Boule vard Commercial Subdistrict Estates Shop ping Center Subdistrict THIS MAP CAN NOT BE INTERPRETED WITHOUT THE GOALS, OBJECTIVES, POLICIES AND LAND USE DESIGNATION DESCRIPTION SECTION OF THE GOLDENGATE AREA MASTER PLAN. NOTE : A D O P T E D - X X X X , 2 0 1 9 GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 32 of 42 8.A.6 Packet Pg. 184 Attachment: 4 CCPC Adoption Recommendations Rural GGE sub element (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261-CPSP-2018-2) IMMOKALEE RD INTERSTATE - 75 IMM OKALEE RD OIL WELL RD COLLIER BLVDEVERGLADES BLVD NDESOTO BLVD SDESOTO BLVD NEVERGLADES BLVD SGOLDEN GATE BLVD W WILSON BLVD NVANDERBILT BEACH RD EXT RURAL GOLDEN GATE ESTATESNEIGHBORHOOD CENTERS Collier County, Florid a AMENDED - OCTOBER 26, 2004(Ord. No. 2004-71)AMENDED - JANUARY 25, 2007(Ord. No. 2007-19) AMENDED - SEPTEMBER 10, 2003(Ord. No. 2003-44) AMENDED - OCTOBER 14, 2008(Ord. No. 2008-59)AMENDED - SEPTEMBER 14, 2011(Ord. No. 2011-29) 0 1 2 30.5 Miles ³ PREPARED BY: BETH YANG, AICPGROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENTFILE: Golden Gate Estates Neighborhood Centers.mxdDATE: 07/2019 RURAL GOLDEN GATE ESTATESNEIGHBORHOOD CENTERSLEGEND RURAL GOLDEN GATE ESTATESNEIGHBORHOOD CENTERS GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 33 of 42 8.A.6 Packet Pg. 185 Attachment: 4 CCPC Adoption Recommendations Rural GGE sub element (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261- 4/29/19 GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 34 of 42 8.A.6 Packet Pg. 186 Attachment: 4 CCPC Adoption Recommendations Rural GGE sub element (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261- GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 35 of 42 8.A.6 Packet Pg. 187 Attachment: 4 CCPC Adoption Recommendations Rural GGE sub element (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261- GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 36 of 42 8.A.6 Packet Pg. 188 Attachment: 4 CCPC Adoption Recommendations Rural GGE sub element (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261- RANDALL BOULEVARD COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 37 of 42 8.A.6 Packet Pg. 189 Attachment: 4 CCPC Adoption Recommendations Rural GGE sub element (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261- EVERGLADES BOULEVARDOIL WELL ROAD C.R. 858IMMOKALEE ROAD C.R. 846WILSON BOULEVARDRANDALL BOULEVARD SUBDISTRICT MISSION GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 38 of 42 8.A.6 Packet Pg. 190 Attachment: 4 CCPC Adoption Recommendations Rural GGE sub element (9747 : Golden Gate Area GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 39 of 42 8.A.6 Packet Pg. 191 Attachment: 4 CCPC Adoption Recommendations Rural GGE sub element (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261- GMPA-PL2018000026108/15/2019Page 40 of 428.A.6Packet Pg. 192Attachment: 4 CCPC Adoption Recommendations Rural GGE sub GMPA-PL2018000026108/15/2019Page 41 of 428.A.6Packet Pg. 193Attachment: 4 CCPC Adoption Recommendations Rural GGE sub element (9747 : Golden Gate Area WILSON BLVDWILSON BLVDOIL WELL RD RANDALL BLVDIMMOKALEE RD4th ST NW2nd ST NW35th AVE NW 37th AVE NW 20th AVE NW 25th AVE NE C h e s a p e a k e B a y C T Ocean Bluff CT 20th AVE NE 35th AVE NE 24th AVE NE 37th AVE NE 20th AVE NE4th ST NE33rd AVE NE 2nd ST NEI MM O K A L E E R D Or ange Tree IMM OKALEE ROAD/RANDALL BLVD PLANNING STUDY AREA PREPARED BY: BETH YANG, AICPGROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENTFILE: Imm Rand al Study Area.mxdDATE: 07/201 9 0 1,000 2,000 3,000500Feet ADOPTED - XXXXX, 2019(Ord. No. XXXX-XX) LEGEND IMMO KALEE RD/RANDALL BLVD PLANNING STUDY AREA RESIDENTIAL ESTATES SUBDISTRICT RANDALL BLVD COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT RURAL SETTLEMENT AREA SUBDISTRICT ¯ GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 42 of 42 8.A.6 Packet Pg. 194 Attachment: 4 CCPC Adoption Recommendations Rural GGE sub element (9747 : Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy-PL20180000261- 08/15/2019 COLLIER COUNTY Collier County Planning Commission Item Number: 9.A.1 Item Summary: ***This item has been continued from August 1, 2019 CCPC meeting*** PL20180003372/CPSS-2019-2: An Ordinance amending Ordinance No. 89-05, as amended, the Collier County Growth Management Plan for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida, specifically amending the Future Land Use Element to revise the Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict of the Urban Mixed Use District as to lots 5 and 6 of the Vanderbilt Commons Subdivision to remove the requirement to provide commercial uses on the first floor with residential units on the upper stories and allow buildings to be all residential uses on Lots 5 and 6; and directing transmittal of the adopted amendments to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity; providing for severability; providing for an effective date. Lots 5 and 6 comprise 10 acres within the 47.94± acre subdistrict located on the north side of Vanderbilt Beach Road and approximately ¼ mile west of Collier Boulevard in Section 34, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. (Companion to PL20180003366) [Coordinator: Corby Schmidt, AICP, Principal Planer] Meeting Date: 08/15/2019 Prepared by: Title: Planner, Senior – Zoning Name: Marcia R Kendall 08/07/2019 10:40 AM Submitted by: Title: Manager - Planning – Zoning Name: Ray Bellows 08/07/2019 10:40 AM Approved By: Review: Growth Management Operations & Regulatory Management Judy Puig Review item Completed 08/07/2019 10:58 AM Growth Management Department David Weeks Additional Reviewer Completed 08/07/2019 11:30 AM Growth Management Operations & Regulatory Management Donna Guitard Review Item Completed 08/07/2019 12:02 PM Growth Management Department James C French Review Item Completed 08/07/2019 3:08 PM Zoning Ray Bellows Review Item Completed 08/08/2019 9:06 AM Planning Commission Mark Strain Meeting Pending 08/15/2019 9:00 AM 9.A.1 Packet Pg. 195 AGENDA ITEM #9.A.1. COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN 2019 SMALL SCALE AMENDMENT (ADOPTION HEARINGS) Project/Petition #PL2018003372/CPSS-2019-2 (Companion Item PL20180003366) CCPC: AUGUST 15, 2019 [continued from 08/01/2019] BCC: SEPTEMBER 24, 2019 9.A.1.a Packet Pg. 196 Attachment: CCPC COVER_2 (9725 : Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 - GMPA) TABLE OF CONTENTS 2019 GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN SMALL SCALE AMENDMENT [ADOPTION HEARING] CCPC August 15, 2019 [continued from 08/01/2019] 1) TAB: Adoption Staff Report DOCUMENT: CCPC Staff Reports: Pl20180003372/CP-2019-2 2) TAB: Adoption Ordinance DOCUMENT: Adoption Ordinance with Exhibit “A” text (and/or maps): PL20180003372/CP-2019-2 3) TAB: Project PL20180003372/ DOCUMENT: Application/Petition CPSS-2019-2 4) TAB: Legal Advertisement DOCUMENT: CCPC Advertisement 9.A.1.b Packet Pg. 197 Attachment: CCPC Table of Contents_2 (9725 : Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 - GMPA) Agenda Item 9.A.tbd ‒ 1 ‒ CPSS-2019-2 / PL20180003372 Amending the Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict in the FLUE STAFF REPORT COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT, ZONING DIVISION COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING SECTION HEARING DATE: August 1, 2019 SUBJECT: PETITION PL20180003372 / CPSS-2019-2, SMALL SCALE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT [ADOPTION HEARING] (Companion to Vanderbilt Commons, Lots 5 & 6 PUD Amendment PL20180003366) ELEMENT: FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT (FLUE) APPLICANT/AGENTS Applicant/Owner: Ralph Cioffi, Manager Vanderbilt Way Apartments, LLC 2950 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 200 Naples, FL 34103 Agents: Lindsay F. Robin, MPA Jeff Wright, Esq. Waldrop Engineering, PA Henderson, Franklin, Starnes & Holt, PA 28100 Bonita Grande Drive 8889 Pelican Bay Boulevard Bonita Springs, Florida 34135 Bonita Springs, Florida 34108 GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION The subject property comprises approximately 2.51 acres and is located at the northwest corner of Buckthorn Drive and Vanderbilt Way, and generally 300 feet north of Vanderbilt Beach Road, approximately one-quarter mile west of Collier Boulevard (CR 951), in Section 34, Township 48 South, Range 26 East. The subject property is a component of the larger, 47.94-acre parent Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Blvd. Commercial Subdistrict, which encompasses two geographic areas; the easterly “existing area” (33.45 acres) and the westerly “expansion area.” (Urban Estates Planning Community) Subject Property 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 198 Attachment: Adoption Stff Rpt_CPSS-19-2 CCPC__HAC_FNLdw (9725 : Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 - GMPA) Agenda Item 9.A.tbd ‒ 2 ‒ CPSS-2019-2 / PL20180003372 Amending the Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict in the FLUE REQUESTED ACTION The applicant seeks to revise the Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Blvd. Commercial Subdistrict in the FLUE and on the Future Land Use Map Series of the Growth Management Plan (GMP), affecting fewer than ten (10) acres, by amending the: • FLUM inset map to depict the affected area (two platted lots), and • Subdistrict text to change use allowance for the affected area. The Subdistrict language proposed by this amendment is found in Ordinance Exhibit “A”. PURPOSE AND DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT The petition proposes to amend Subdistrict provisions to remove the requirement for commercial uses on the entry levels of residential buildings to allow single-use residential only buildings. The companion PUD amendment petition [PL20180003366] will amend the Vanderbilt Commons Mixed-Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD), to allow the already-approved residential dwelling units to be located on all floors of multi-story residential-use only buildings on Lots 5 and 6; with another revision removing a description of future mixed uses. STAFF ANALYSIS FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATIONS, ZONING AND LAND USES: Existing Conditions: Subject Property: The two-lot subject property is zoned (is part of the) Vanderbilt Commons Mixed- Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD). That MPUD is approved for 200,000 square feet of commercial uses (office, retail, and personal service uses) and 58 multi-family dwelling units. The 33.45-acre “existing area” portion of the parent Subdistrict is zoned Mission Hills PUD. This PUD is approved for 200,000 sq. ft. of commercial, financial, health and office uses, and preserve areas. Of the 200,000 sq. ft. approved, 121,817 sq. ft. have been developed – with two undeveloped outlots remaining. The Future Land Use Map designation for these properties is the Urban Mixed Use District, Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Blvd. Commercial Subdistrict. Surrounding Lands: North: A large portion of bounding lands to the north of the subject “expansion area” property are zoned Residential PUD (Wolf Creek, aka Black Bear Ridge), approved for a variety of residential uses (754 residential units), and preserve and open space. Of the 754 residential units approved, 162 single-family units and 118 multi-family units have been built. The area north of the “existing area” property is zoned MPUD (Sonoma Oaks), which allows for 120,000 sq. ft. of commercial and office uses, single- and multi-family residential uses (up to 114 residential units) or a senior housing facility (up to 456 units), and essential services (including a County well site and pump house), and preserve areas. This PUD is currently undeveloped. The Future Land Use Map designation of these lands is Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict. East: Land to the east of the subject “expansion area” property is zoned Mission Hills PUD. The Mission Hills property is reaching commercial (grocery store, automotive service centers, convenience store, eating establishment, commercial strip center, branch bank, etc.) buildout. 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 199 Attachment: Adoption Stff Rpt_CPSS-19-2 CCPC__HAC_FNLdw (9725 : Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 - GMPA) Agenda Item 9.A.tbd ‒ 3 ‒ CPSS-2019-2 / PL20180003372 Amending the Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict in the FLUE The current Future Land Use Map designation is also Urban Mixed Use District, Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Blvd. Commercial Subdistrict. This is the 33.45-acre “existing area” portion of the Subdistrict. South: Land to the south of the subject property, across Vanderbilt Beach Road, is zoned Estates and some parcels are developed with a single-family residence. The Golden Gate Area Master Plan Future Land Use Map designates most of this area Estates Mixed-Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict. The Commercial Western Estates Infill Subdistrict comprises the property at the southwest corner of Vanderbilt Beach Road and Collier Blvd. West: Land to the west of the subject property is zoned Residential PUD (Wolf Creek, aka Portofino Falls), approved for residential uses (754 residential units), and preserve and open space. Of the 754 residential units approved, 162 single-family units and 118 multi-family units have been built. The Future Land Use Map designation of this land area is Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict. In summary, the existing land uses in the area immediately surrounding the subject property are predominately urban residential in nature to the west and north; estates residential to the south; and, commercial to the east (within the “existing area” of the Subdistrict). A place of worship is located farther east, across Collier Blvd. Criteria for GMP Amendments in Florida Statutes Data and analysis requirements for comprehensive plans and plan amendments are noted in Chapter 163, F.S., specifically as listed below. Identification and Analysis of the Pertinent Criteria in Florida Statutes, Chapter 163.3187, to Qualify as a Small-Scale Comprehensive Plan (GMP) Amendment: The process for adoption of small-scale comprehensive plan amendment requires (in part) the following statutory standards be met, [followed by staff analysis in bracketed text]. (1) A small scale development amendment may be adopted under the following conditions: (a) The proposed amendment involves a use of 10 acres or fewer. [The amendment pertains to a ±2.21-acre property.] (b) The cumulative annual effect of the acreage for all small scale development amendments adopted by the local government does not exceed a maximum of 120 acres in a calendar year. [Thus far, no small scale GMP amendments have been adopted in calendar year 2019.] (c) The proposed amendment does not involve a text change to the goals, policies, and objectives of the local government’s comprehensive plan, but only proposes a land use change to the future land use map for a site-specific small scale development activity. However, text changes that relate directly to, and are adopted simultaneously with, the small scale future land use map amendment shall be permissible under this section. [This amendment involves text changes that relate directly to site-specific Future Land Use Map changes.] 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 200 Attachment: Adoption Stff Rpt_CPSS-19-2 CCPC__HAC_FNLdw (9725 : Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 - GMPA) Agenda Item 9.A.tbd ‒ 4 ‒ CPSS-2019-2 / PL20180003372 Amending the Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict in the FLUE (d) The property that is the subject of the proposed amendment is not located within an area of critical state concern unless the project subject to the proposed amendment involves the construction of affordable housing units meeting the criteria of s. 420.0004(3), and is located within an area of critical state concern designated by s. 380.0552 or by the Administration Commission pursuant to s. 380.05(1). [The subject property is not within an Area of Critical State Concern.] (4) Comprehensive plans may only be amended in such a way as to preserve the internal consistency of the plan pursuant to s. 163.3177. [The amendment preserves the internal consistency between and among GMP elements.] Section 163.3177(1)(f), Florida Statutes: The process for adoption of a comprehensive plan amendment requires (in part) that plan amendments shall be based upon relevant and appropriate data and an analysis by the local government, (f) All mandatory and optional elements of the comprehensive plan and plan amendments shall be based upon relevant and appropriate data and an analysis by the local government that may include, but not be limited to, surveys, studies, community goals and vision, and other data available at the time of adoption of the comprehensive plan or plan amendment. To be based on data means to react to it in an appropriate way and to the extent necessary indicated by the data available on that particular subject at the time of adoption of the plan or plan amendment at issue. 1. Surveys, studies, and data utilized in the preparation of the comprehensive plan may not be deemed a part of the comprehensive plan unless adopted as a part of it. Copies of such studies, surveys, data, and supporting documents for proposed plans and plan amendments shall be made available for public inspection, and copies of such plans shall be made available to the public upon payment of reasonable charges for reproduction. Support data or summaries are not subject to the compliance review process, but the comprehensive plan must be clearly based on appropriate data. Support data or summaries may be used to aid in the determination of compliance and consistency. 2. Data must be taken from professionally accepted sources. The application of a methodology utilized in data collection or whether a particular methodology is professionally accepted may be evaluated. However, the evaluation may not include whether one accepted methodology is better than another. Original data collection by local governments is not required. However, local governments may use original data so long as methodologies are professionally accepted. 3. The comprehensive plan shall be based upon permanent and seasonal population estimates and projections, which shall either be those published by the Office of Economic and Demographic Research or generated by the local government based upon a professionally acceptable methodology. The plan must be based on at least the minimum amount of land required to accommodate the medium projections as published by the Office of Economic and Demographic Research for at least a 10-year planning period unless otherwise limited under s. 380.05, including related rules of the Administration Commission. Absent physical limitations on population growth, population projections for each municipality, and the unincorporated area within a county must, at a minimum, be reflective of each area’s proportional share of the total county population and the total county population growth. 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 201 Attachment: Adoption Stff Rpt_CPSS-19-2 CCPC__HAC_FNLdw (9725 : Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 - GMPA) Agenda Item 9.A.tbd ‒ 5 ‒ CPSS-2019-2 / PL20180003372 Amending the Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict in the FLUE Section 163.3177(6)(a)2. Florida Statutes: The process for adoption of a comprehensive plan amendment requires (in part) that plan amendments shall be based upon surveys, studies and data regarding the area, 2. The future land use plan and plan amendments shall be based upon surveys, studies, and data regarding the area, as applicable, including: a. The amount of land required to accommodate anticipated growth. b. The projected permanent and seasonal population of the area. c. The character of undeveloped land. d. The availability of water supplies, public facilities, and services. e. The need for redevelopment, including the renewal of blighted areas and the elimination of nonconforming uses which are inconsistent with the character of the community. f. The compatibility of uses on lands adjacent to or closely proximate to military installations. g. The compatibility of uses on lands adjacent to an airport as defined in s. 330.35 and consistent with s. 333.02. h. The discouragement of urban sprawl. i. The need for job creation, capital investment, and economic development that will strengthen and diversify the community’s economy. j. The need to modify land uses and development patterns within antiquated subdivisions. Section 163.3177(6)(a)8., Florida Statutes: The process for adoption of a comprehensive plan map amendment [which this is] requires (in part) that plan amendments shall be based analyses of the availability of facilities and services, the suitability of the plan amendment for its proposed uses, and of the minimum amount of land needed to achieve the goals and requirements of the existing subdistricts, overlays and special designations, within which land use programs and activities are ultimately directed. (a) A future land use plan element designating proposed future general distribution, location, and extent of the uses of land for residential uses, commercial uses, industry, agriculture, recreation, conservation, education, public facilities, and other categories of the public and private uses of land. The approximate acreage and the general range of density or intensity of use shall be provided for the gross land area included in each existing land use category. The element shall establish the long-term end toward which land use programs and activities are ultimately directed. 8. Future land use map amendments shall be based upon the following analyses: a. An analysis of the availability of facilities and services. b. An analysis of the suitability of the plan amendment for its proposed use considering the character of the undeveloped land, soils, topography, natural resources, and historic resources on site. c. An analysis of the minimum amount of land needed to achieve the goals and requirements of this section. 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 202 Attachment: Adoption Stff Rpt_CPSS-19-2 CCPC__HAC_FNLdw (9725 : Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 - GMPA) Agenda Item 9.A.tbd ‒ 6 ‒ CPSS-2019-2 / PL20180003372 Amending the Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict in the FLUE It is incumbent upon the petitioner to provide appropriate and relevant data and analysis to address the statutory requirements for a Plan amendment, then present and defend, as necessary, that data and analysis. BACKGROUND, CONSIDERATIONS AND ANALYSIS Future Land Use and Zoning History: • 1998 – The first PUD, the Golden Pond PUD, is designated for the 33.45-acre property at the northwest quadrant of the Vanderbilt Beach Road and Collier Boulevard, to allow up to 75 multi- family dwelling units. This PUD would remain undeveloped. • 2001 – The GMP amendment is approved to establish the [subject] Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Blvd. Commercial Subdistrict, to allow up to 200,000 sq. ft. of commercial uses, financial institutions, business services, and professional and medical offices on the same 33.45-acre property. • 2003 – The next PUD, the Mission Hills PUD, replaces Golden Pond on the 33.45-acre property at the northwest quadrant of the Vanderbilt Beach Road and Collier Boulevard, to allow 200,000 sq. ft. of general commercial uses. • 2005 – The GMP amendment is approved to expand the Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Blvd. Commercial Subdistrict, which prohibits certain commercial uses considered incompatible with residential uses in the mixed-use setting. The adoption Ordinance for the Subdistrict, unintentionally omitted language for an additional amount of commercial floor area (150,000 sq. ft.), and its office – retail split (90,000 sq. ft./60,000 sq. ft.). • 2005 – The Carolina Village MPUD is approved for the (original) 15.88-acre “expansion area” property at the northwest quadrant of Vanderbilt Beach Road and Collier Boulevard, to allow up to 150,000 sq. ft. of commercial uses and, up to 64 residential-over-commercial units. This MPUD does not include the gas stations, convenience stores with gas pumps, fast food restaurants with drive-through lanes, and tire stores prohibited by Subdistrict provisions. Also, this MPUD does not include a square feet limitation for office/retail use categories. • 2017 – The Subdistrict is amended to revise the Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict to: 1) add 200,000 square feet of gross leasable floor area of commercial land uses in the (originally) 15.88-acre expansion area, which is the site of the Carolina Village PUD, resulting in a total of 400,000 square feet of commercial land uses in the entire Subdistrict. Residential uses are allowed in mixed-use buildings at a maximum density of 16 dwelling units per acre; 2) remove a development restriction related to transportation impacts; and, 3) amend and re-order the text. Related changes are approved in the companion PUD amendment. Appropriateness of the Site and the Change: The two-lot site is appropriate for the change, as the number of residential units is already approved, the amendment still allows commercial uses without requiring them, and the Subdistrict does not lose its mixed-use characteristics. Traffic Capacity/Traffic Circulation Impact Analysis, Including Transportation Element Consistency Determination: No issues or concerns have been identified regarding transportation impacts. 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 203 Attachment: Adoption Stff Rpt_CPSS-19-2 CCPC__HAC_FNLdw (9725 : Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 - GMPA) Agenda Item 9.A.tbd ‒ 7 ‒ CPSS-2019-2 / PL20180003372 Amending the Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict in the FLUE Environmental Impacts: No issues or concerns have been identified regarding impacts environmental impacts or requirements of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME)The project will be subject to the requirement of accidental discovery of archaeological or historical sites as required by CCME Policy 11.1.3. The provision is also included in Subsection 2.03.07 E of the LDC. Public Facilities Impacts: No issues or concerns have been identified regarding impacts upon potable water, wastewater, solid waste, drainage, park and recreational facilities, schools, or EMS and fire protection services. NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM) SYNOPSIS The application team held a Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) at the Greater Naples Fire Rescue Headquarters, 14575 Collier Boulevard, Naples on June 3, 2019, at 5:30 p.m. as required by Section 10.03.05 F. of the LDC. This NIM was advertised, noticed, and held jointly for this GMP amendment petition and companion PUD amendment petition. Approximately sixteen people [mainly from the Black Bear Ridge community] other than the applicant team (including attorney Jeff Wright, Esq., of Henderson, Franklin, Starnes & Holt, PA, and sub- consultants) and County staff attended ‒ and heard the following information: The agent representing this application (Lindsay F. Robin, of Waldrop Engineering), described the site location, provided a full description of the proposed changes to the group, and how this site is transitional for uses in the immediate area [residential – north; commercial – south and east]. The applicant (Ralph Cioffi, of Vanderbilt Way Apartments), explained the property’s background to those present, especially how they’ve changed since 2014. He is no longer involved with the party who developed the south (front) half of Vanderbilt Commons, or the other previous partial owners. He has retained these two lots to develop himself. Mr. Cioffi described the residential buildings planned for construction, and how they are compatible with nearby commercial uses in the mixed-use development. One speaker voiced opposition to the proposed amendments removing the mandate for commercial uses to occupy the first floor of residential buildings, and asked for more information. Mr. Cioffi described the all-residential building, with the lowest levels having the largest unit sizes of the two- and three-bedroom apartments, with first-floor attached garages facing the north [away from commercial properties to the south and east]. All previously-approved 58 residential units will be in a single building occupying the two lots. Another speaker voiced concerns over residents’ outdoor activities, and how outdoor lighting will be a problem. Another asked about the large residential building’s design, including style and color. Mr. Cioffi explained the general size and location of the building on the site, but has not decided on the architectural details themselves and had no drawings or elevations to illustrate them at this time. A speaker identified traffic problems that continue on Buckstone and Pristine Drives, as the commercial traffic from Mission Hills visits newer businesses in Vanderbilt Commons [and vice versa]. Another asked about considering traffic calming practices and utilizing them to better protect the residents [especially children] and control this traffic. The meeting was completed by 6:25 p.m. NIM summary minutes, prepared by the application team, are included in this petition package. 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 204 Attachment: Adoption Stff Rpt_CPSS-19-2 CCPC__HAC_FNLdw (9725 : Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 - GMPA) Agenda Item 9.A.tbd ‒ 8 ‒ CPSS-2019-2 / PL20180003372 Amending the Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict in the FLUE This synopsis provides the annotated NIM proceedings. An audio recording of the entire Neighborhood Information Meeting is available on the County’s “I” drive, at I:/GMD/Comprehensive Planning/NIM Recordings & PREAPP Notes. [Synopsis prepared by C. Schmidt, AICP, Principal Planner] FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS • The subject site is undeveloped, while earlier projects in Vanderbilt Commons PUD [and this Subdistrict] are developing with commercial projects as planned. • This amendment effects no known historic or archaeological sites. • No issues regarding impacts upon potable water, wastewater collection and treatment, solid waste collection and disposal services, arterial and collector roads or other public infrastructure have been identified. • The proposed amendment has no effect on the requirements of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME). • People attending the Neighborhood Information Meeting opposed the proposed change. • A companion rezone petition has been submitted concurrent with this GMPA petition. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS This Staff Report was reviewed by the Office of the County Attorney on July 12, 2019. The criteria for GMP amendments to the Future Land Use Element and map series are in Sections 163.3177(1)(f) and 163.3177(6)(a)2 and 163.3177(6)(a)8, Florida Statutes. [HFAC] STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Collier County Planning Commission forward Petition PL20180003372/CPSS-2019-2 to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation to approve for adoption and transmittal to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity. [Remainder of page intentionally left blank] 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 205 Attachment: Adoption Stff Rpt_CPSS-19-2 CCPC__HAC_FNLdw (9725 : Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 - GMPA) Agenda Item 9.A.tbd ‒ 9 ‒ CPSS-2019-2 / PL20180003372 Amending the Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict in the FLUE 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 206 Attachment: Adoption Stff Rpt_CPSS-19-2 CCPC__HAC_FNLdw (9725 : Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 - GMPA) VANDERBILT WAY COMMONS LOTS 5 & 6 GMPA CCPC PACKAGE PL20180003372 APPLICATION 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 207 Attachment: Petition_Application PL20180003372-CPSS-19-2 (9725 : Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 - GMPA) 1 APPLICATION NUMBER: ___________________ DATE RECEIVED: ______________________________ PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE DATE: __________________________________________________ DATE SUFFICIENT: ______________________________________________________________________ This application, with all required supplemental data and information, must be completed and accompanied by the appropriate fee, and returned to the Growth Management Department, Zoning Division, Comprehensive Planning Section, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104. 239-252- 2400. The application must be reviewed by staff for sufficiency within 30 calendar days following the filing deadline before it will be processed and advertised for public hearing. The applicant will be notified in writing, of the sufficiency determination. If insufficient, the applicant will have 30 days to remedy the deficiencies. For additional information on the processing of the application, see Resolution 97-431 as amended by Resolution 98-18 (both attached). If you have any questions, please contact the Comprehensive Planning Section at 239-252-2400. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS I. GENERAL INFOMRATION A. Name of Applicant: ______________________________________________________________ Company: _______________________________________________________________________ Address: _________________________________________________________________________ City: ______________________________ State: _____________________ Zip Code: __________ Phone Number: ______________________ Fax Number: ________________________________ B. Name of Agent* _________________________________________________________________ • THIS WILL BE THE PERSON CONTACTED FOR ALL BUSINESS RELATED TO THE PETITION. Company: ________________________________________________________________________ Address: ___________________________________________________________________ City: ___________________________ State: ____________________ Zip Code: ________ Phone Number: ____________________ Fax Number: ___________________________ C. Name of Owner (s) of Record: ____________________________________________________ Address: _________________________________________________________________________ City: ___________________________ State: ___________________ Zip Code: ________ Phone Number: _______________________ Fax Number: ______________________________ 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 208 Attachment: Petition_Application PL20180003372-CPSS-19-2 (9725 : Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 - GMPA) 2 D. Name, Address and Qualifications of additional planners, architects, engineers, environmental consultants and other professionals providing information contained in this application. II. Disclosure of Interest Information: A. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, Tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest. (Use additional sheets if necessary). Name and Address Percentage of Ownership __________________________________________ _________________________ __________________________________________ _________________________ __________________________________________ _________________________ __________________________________________ _________________________ __________________________________________ _________________________ B. If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each. Name and Address Percentage of Stock __________________________________________ _________________________ __________________________________________ _________________________ __________________________________________ _________________________ __________________________________________ _________________________ __________________________________________ _________________________ C. If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest. Name and Address Percentage of Interest __________________________________________ _________________________ __________________________________________ _________________________ __________________________________________ _________________________ __________________________________________ _________________________ __________________________________________ _________________________ __________________________________________ _________________________ 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 209 Attachment: Petition_Application PL20180003372-CPSS-19-2 (9725 : Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 - GMPA) 3 D. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and/or limited partners. Name and Address Percentage of Ownership __________________________________________ _________________________ __________________________________________ _________________________ __________________________________________ _________________________ __________________________________________ _________________________ E. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners. Name and Address Percentage of Ownership __________________________________________ _________________________ __________________________________________ _________________________ __________________________________________ _________________________ __________________________________________ _________________________ __________________________________________ _________________________ __________________________________________ _________________________ __________________________________________ _________________________ Date of Contract: __________________ F. If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or officers, if a corporation, partnership, or trust. Name and Address ________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________ G. Date subject property acquired ( ) leased ( ):________Term of lease: ______yrs./mos. If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate date of option: ______________ and date option terminates: ______________, or anticipated closing: _______________________. H. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 210 Attachment: Petition_Application PL20180003372-CPSS-19-2 (9725 : Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 - GMPA) 4 III. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: A. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: ______________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ B. GENERAL LOCATION: _____________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ C. PLANNING COMMUNITY: _______________________ D. TAZ: ______________________ E. SIZE IN ACRES: __________________________________ F. ZONING: __________________ G. SURROUNDING LAND USE PATTERN: _________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________ H. FUTURE LAND USE MAP DESIGNATION(S): _____________________________________________ IV. TYPE OF REQUEST: A. GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN ELEMENT (S) TO BE AMENDED: ______ Housing Element ______ Recreation/Open Space ______ Traffic Circulation Sub-Element ______ Mass Transit Sub-Element ______ Aviation Sub-Element ______ Potable Water Sub-Element ______ Sanitary Sewer Sub-Element ______ NGWAR Sub-Element ______ Solid Waste Sub-Element ______ Drainage Sub-Element ______ Capital Improvement Element ______ CCME Element ______ Future Land Use Element ______ Golden Gate Master Plan ______ Immokalee Master Plan B. AMEND PAGE (S): _________________OF THE: _______________________________ELEMENT AS FOLLOWS: (Use Strike-through to identify language to be deleted; Use Underline to identify language to be added). Attach additional pages if necessary: _________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________ 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 211 Attachment: Petition_Application PL20180003372-CPSS-19-2 (9725 : Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 - GMPA) 5 C. AMEND FUTURE LAND USE MAP(S) DESIGNATION FROM ______________________________ TO _______________________________________________________________________________ D. AMEND OTHER MAP(S) AND EXHIBITS AS FOLLOWS: (Name & Page #) ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ E. DESCRIBE ADDITINAL CHANGES REQUESTED: ________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ V. REQUIRED INFORMATION: NOTE: ALL AERIALS MUST BE AT A SCALE OF NO SMALLER THAN I”=400’. At least one copy reduced to 8- 1/2 x 11 shall be provided of all aerials and/or maps. A. LAND USE __________ Provide general location map showing surrounding developments (PUD, DRI’s, existing zoning) with subject property outlined. __________ Provide most recent aerial of site showing subject boundaries, source, and date. __________ Provide a map and summary table of existing land use and zoning within a radius of 300 feet from boundaries of subject property. B. FUTURE LAND USE AND DESIGNATION __________ Provide map of existing Future Land Use Designation(s) of subject property and adjacent lands, with acreage totals for each land use designation on the subject property. C. ENVIRONMENTAL ___________ Provide most recent aerial and summary table of acreage of native habitats and soils occurring on site. HABITAT IDENTIFICATION MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH THE FDOT-FLORIDA LAND USE, COVER AND FORMS CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (FLUCCS CODE). NOTE: THIS MAY BE INDICATED ON SAME AERIAL AS THE LAND USE AERIAL IN “A” ABOVE. ___________ Provide a summary table of Federal (US Fish & Wildlife Service) and State (Florida Game & Freshwater Fish Commission) listed plant and animal species known to occur on the site and/or known to inhabit biological communities similar to the site (e.g. panther or black bear range, avian rookery, bird migratory route, etc.).Identify historic and/or archaeological sites on the subject property. D. GROWTH MANAGEMENT Reference 9J-11.006, F.A.C. and Collier County’s Capital Improvements Element 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 212 Attachment: Petition_Application PL20180003372-CPSS-19-2 (9725 : Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 - GMPA) 6 Policy 1.1.2 (Copies attached). 1. INSERT “Y” FOR YES OR “N” FOR NO IN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING: __________ Is the proposed amendment located in an Area of Critical State Concern? (Reference 9J-11.006(1)(a)(5), F.A.C.). IF so, identify area located in ACSC. _________ Is the proposed amendment directly related to a proposed Development of Regional Impact pursuant to Chapter 380 F.S.? (Reference 9J-11.006(1)(a)7.a, F.A.C.) __________ Is the proposed amendment directly related to a proposed Small Scale Development Activity pursuant to Subsection 163.3187 (1)(c), F.S. ? (Reference 9J-11.006(1)(a)7.b, F.A.C.) Does the proposed amendment create a significant impact in population which is defined as a potential increase in County-wide population by more than 5% of population projections? (Reference Capital Improvement Element Policy 1.1.2). If yes, indicate mitigation measures being proposed in conjunction with the proposed amendment. _________ Does the proposed land use cause an increase in density and/or intensity to the uses permitted in a specific land use designation and district identified (commercial, industrial, etc.) or is the proposed land use a new land use designation or district? (Reference Rule 9J-5.006(5) F.A.C.). If so, provide data and analysis to support the suitability of land for the proposed use, and of environmentally sensitive land, ground water and natural resources. (Reference Rule 9J-11.007, F.A.C.) E. PUBLIC FACILITIES 1. Provide the existing Level of Service Standard (LOS) and document the impact the proposed change will have on the following public facilities: _________ Potable Water _________ Sanitary Sewer _________ Arterial & Collector Roads; Name specific road and LOS ____________________________ ____________________________ ____________________________ ____________________________ __________ Drainage __________ Solid Waste __________ Parks: Community and Regional If the proposed amendment involves an increase in residential density, or an increase in intensity for commercial and/or industrial development that would cause the LOS for public facilities to fall below the adopted LOS, indicate mitigation measures being proposed in conjunction with the proposed amendment. (Reference Capital Improvement Element Objective 1 and Policies) 2. ________ Provide a map showing the location of existing services and public facilities that will serve the subject property (i.e. water, sewer, fire protection, police protection, schools and emergency medical services. 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 213 Attachment: Petition_Application PL20180003372-CPSS-19-2 (9725 : Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 - GMPA) 7 3. ________ Document proposed services and public facilities, identify provider, and describe the effect the proposed change will have on schools, fire protection and emergency medical services. F. OTHER Identify the following areas relating to the subject property: _____ Flood zone based on Flood Insurance Rate Map data (FIRM). _____ Location of wellfields and cones of influence, if applicable. (Identified on Collier County Zoning Maps) _____ Traffic Congestion Boundary, if applicable _____ Coastal Management Boundary, if applicable _____ High Noise Contours (65 LDN or higher) surrounding the Naples Airport, if applicable (identified on Collier County Zoning Maps). G. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION _____ $16,700.00 non-refundable filing fee made payable to the Board of County Commissioners due at time of submittal. (Plus proportionate share of advertising costs) _____ $9,000.00 non-refundable filing fee for a Small Scale Amendment made payable to the Board of County Commissioners due at time of submittal. (Plus proportionate share of advertising costs) _____ Proof of ownership (copy of deed) _____ Notarized Letter of Authorization if Agent is not the Owner (See attached form) _____ Original and 5 complete, signed applications with all attachments including maps, at time of submittal. After sufficiency is completed, 25 copies of the complete application will be required. * If you have held a pre-application meeting and paid the pre-application fee of $250.00 at the meeting, deduct that amount from the above application fee amount when submitting your application. All pre-application fees are included in the total application submittal fee. Otherwise the overage will be applied to future proportionate share advertising costs. * Maps shall include: North arrow, name and location of principal roadways and shall be at a scale of 1”=400’ or at a scale as determined during the pre-application meeting. 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 214 Attachment: Petition_Application PL20180003372-CPSS-19-2 (9725 : Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 - GMPA) VANDERBILT WAY COMMONS LOTS 5 & 6 GMPA CCPC PACKAGE PL20180003372 AERIAL 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 215 Attachment: Petition_Application PL20180003372-CPSS-19-2 (9725 : Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 - GMPA) ² Vanderbilt Beach Road Collier Boulevard/CR 9517th Avenue NWPristine Drive5th Avenue NW Collier Boulevard/CR 951Mission Hills Drive Wolfe Road 3th Avenue NW Weber Boulevard NVanderbilt Commons MPUD/GMPAAERIAL MAP Vanderbilt WayApartments, LLC Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye. Earthstar Geographics, NES/Airbus DS,USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 216 Attachment: Petition_Application PL20180003372-CPSS-19-2 (9725 : Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 - GMPA) VANDERBILT WAY COMMONS LOTS 5 & 6 GMPA CCPC PACKAGE PL20180003372 ZONING MAP 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 217 Attachment: Petition_Application PL20180003372-CPSS-19-2 (9725 : Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 - GMPA) ² Vanderbilt Beach Road Collier Boulevard/CR 9517th Avenue NWPristine Drive5th Avenue NW Collier Boulevard/CR 951Mission Hills Drive Wolfe Road Vanderbilt Commons MPUD/GMPACURRENT ZONING MAP PUD A Vanderbilt WayApartments, LLC RPUD MPUD 0 500 1,000250 Feet Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye. Earthstar Geographics, NES/Airbus DS,USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community E A Rural AgriculturalE EstatePUD Planned Unit DevelopmentRPUD Residential Planned Unit DevelopmentMPUD Mixed Use Planned Unit Development Zoning Districts PUD MPUD PUD MPUD RPUD RPUD PUD MPUD RPUD A 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 218 Attachment: Petition_Application PL20180003372-CPSS-19-2 (9725 : Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 - GMPA) VANDERBILT WAY COMMONS LOTS 5 & 6 GMPA CCPC PACKAGE PL20180003372 JUSTIFICATION NARRATIVE 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 219 Attachment: Petition_Application PL20180003372-CPSS-19-2 (9725 : Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 - GMPA) Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 GMPA Justification Narrative Page 1 of 4 VANDERBILT COMMONS LOTS 5 AND 6 GMPA AMENDMENT JUSTIFICATION NARRATIVE The Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 and 6 GMPA property (“Property”) comprises 2.51+/- acres and is located specifically within the Vanderbilt Commons Mixed Use Planned Unit Development, Lots 5 and 6. The property is located at the northwest intersection of Vanderbilt Beach Road and Collier Boulevard in unincorporated Collier County, Florida. The Property is designated within the Urban Mixed Use District, Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict. The Property is zoned Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) pursuant to Ordinance 17-47. The MPUD allows up to 200,000 square feet of commercial uses, including retail and office, and up to 58 multi-family dwelling units. The Property is currently undeveloped and cleared of vegetation. Through this petition, the Applicant is requesting a small-scale amendment to the Future Land Use Element, Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict, to remove the requirement to provide first-floor commercial uses with residential on the upper stories. The Applicant has also filed a companion PUDA application (PL20180003366) to remove the PUD requirement for commercial uses on the first floor of the mixed use buildings. The requested amendment continues to provide a horizontally integrated mixed use development by locating residential uses and commercial uses within proximity to each other within the same PUD. The proposed text amendment applies solely to Lots 5 and 6 of the Vanderbilt Commons MPUD as described in the application materials, and will not apply to other properties in the Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict. The companion MPUD amendment application (PL20180003366) maintains the approved commercial intensity and residential density and only requests to provide residential-only buildings on Lots 5 and 6 within the MPUD boundaries in accordance with market demand. Once fully developed, the MPUD provides for a mixed use program that encourages multi- modal transportation and a reduction in vehicle miles traveled. As outlined in the Letter of No Impact prepared by Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, the amendment to allow residential uses on the first floor of the mixed use buildings, and to make clear that residential uses do not have to be in mixed use buildings, has no traffic impacts. The following is data and analysis that supports approval of the proposed GMP Amendment and identifies the request’s appropriateness in relation to the adopted Goals, Objectives and Policies in the GMP and the requirements set forth in Chapter 163, Florida Statutes. LOCATION & SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENT PATTERN The Property is located at the northwest intersection of Vanderbilt Beach Road and Collier Blvd. approximately 1/4 mile west of Collier Blvd. The site represents infill development based upon the existing and approved/planned developments, roadways and preserve surrounding the project. Please refer to Table 1 below, which provides an inventory of the immediately adjacent Future Land Use Categories, zoning districts, and existing land uses. 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 220 Attachment: Petition_Application PL20180003372-CPSS-19-2 (9725 : Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 - GMPA) Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 GMPA Justification Narrative Page 2 of 4 TABLE 1: INVENTORY OF SURROUNDING LANDS DIRECTION FUTURE LAND USE ZONING DISTRICT EXISTING LAND USE North Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict RPUD Preserve; Single-Family Residential (W olf Creek RPUD aka Black Bear Ridge) South Urban Mixed Use District, Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Blvd. Commercial Subdistrict MPUD Vacant Commercial (Vanderbilt Commons MPUD) East Urban Mixed Use District, Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Blvd. Commercial Subdistrict PUD Commercial (Mission Hills PUD) West Urban Mixed Use District, Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Blvd. Commercial Subdistrict MPUD Water Management Area (Vanderbilt Commons MPUD) The Property is surrounded by PUD-zoned lands and public right-of-way. Approximately 300-feet of preserve areas separate Lots 5 and 6 from the single-family residential located in the Black Bear Ridge community to the north. The Property is designated within a commercial subdistrict, which is specifically intended to provide commercial and residential uses in an area of the county serviced by existing and adequate public infrastructure. The surrounding development pattern is indicative of the intent for compact, urban levels of development in the Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict to accommodate the need for goods, services, and higher-density housing options in this area of Collier County. GMP CONSISTENCY Future Land Use Objective 5: Implement land use policies that promote sound planning, protect environmentally sensitive lands and habitat for listed species while protecting private property rights, ensure compatibility of land uses and further the implementation of the Future Land Use Element. Directly north of Lots 5 and 6 is Tract C of the MPUD, which is the 0.18+/- acre preserve tract. This tract connects to the existing Wolf Creek RPUD preserve, therefore providing a linkage in preserves that allows wildlife more land area to create habitats. Directly north of the preserve areas are single-family residential uses located within the Black Bear Ridge community. The amendment proposes to increase compatibility with these uses by removing the requirement to provide a more intense development, consisting of the 58 dwelling units AND commercial uses on the first floor. The amendment creates a transition of intensity from the commercial uses to the south, to the single-family residential uses to the north. Future Land Use Policy 5.3: All rezonings must be consistent with this Growth Management Plan. 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 221 Attachment: Petition_Application PL20180003372-CPSS-19-2 (9725 : Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 - GMPA) Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 GMPA Justification Narrative Page 3 of 4 As proposed, the companion PUDA application is consistent with the proposed text amendments, and therefore consistent with the GMP. Future Land Use Policy 5.6 New developments shall be compatible with, and complementary to, the surrounding land uses, as set forth in the Land Development Code. As noted above, the proposed GMP amendment creates a more compatible and complementary development pattern. The amendment creates a transition of intensity from the commercial uses to the south, to the single-family residential uses to the north. Future Land Use Objective 7: Promote smart growth policies, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and adhere to the existing development character of the Collier County, where applicable, and as follows: Future Land Use Policy 7.1: The County shall encourage developers and property owners to connect their properties to fronting collector and arterial roads, except where no such connection can be made without violating intersection spacing requirements of the Land Development Code. Future Land Use Policy 7.2: The County shall encourage internal accesses or loop roads in an effort to help reduce vehicle congestion on nearby collector and arterial roads and minimize the need for traffic signals. Future Land Use Policy 7.3: All new and existing developments shall be encouraged to connect their local streets and/or interconnection points with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless of land use type. The interconnection of local streets between developments is also addressed in Policy 9.3 of the Transportation Element. Future Land Use Policy 7.4: The County shall encourage new developments to provide walkable communities with a blend of densities, common open spaces, civic facilities and a range of housing prices and types. The proposed small-scale GMPA application results in a horizontally integrated mixed use project that maintains the ability to promote walkable and pedestrian-friendly environments. The overall MPUD creates the ability to reduce greenhouse gases by providing residential uses in proximity to commercial uses thereby promoting alternative transportation opportunities such as walking or biking. Access is provided to Lots 5 and 6 via an existing roadway (Vanderbilt Way) internal to the MPUD. This roadway provides access to all of the parcels in the MPUD and further enhances the goals of the GMP by providing opportunities for enhanced interconnectivity. The amendment directly supports sound planning principles. ENVIRONMENTAL The property is cleared of vegetation. The proposed site-specific text amendment to Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict will have no effect on the requirements of the preserve areas previously approved for the Vanderbilt Commons 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 222 Attachment: Petition_Application PL20180003372-CPSS-19-2 (9725 : Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 - GMPA) Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 GMPA Justification Narrative Page 4 of 4 MPUD. The companion PUD application will retain the required on-site preserve area in full compliance with the GMP and LDC. Based upon this information, the site is suitable for residential development due to a lack of environmental sensitivity and on-site natural resources. INFRASTRUCTURE The proposed small-scale amendment does not request an increase to the approved density or intensity. The amendment will have virtually no impact on infrastructure. The amendment results in a less intensive development program by transitioning to residential- only buildings adjacent to Black Bear Ridge. As outlined in the enclosed Letter of No Impact prepared by Trebilcock Consulting Services, the amendment does not result in a level of service issue. Access is being provided to the site via an existing roadway internal to the site. The subject project will be served by Collier County potable water services and lies in the North County Water Service Area. The subject project will be served by Collier County wastewater collection and treatment services and lies in the North County Water Reclamation Service Area. CONCLUSION In summary, the proposed small-scale GMP amendment to allow residential uses on the first floor of buildings on Lots 5 and 6 will create a more compatible development and upholds the intent for mixed use development in the Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict. The amendment does not request to increase density or intensity previously approved through Ordinance 17-47. 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 223 Attachment: Petition_Application PL20180003372-CPSS-19-2 (9725 : Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 - GMPA) VANDERBILT WAY COMMONS LOTS 5 & 6 GMPA CCPC PACKAGE PL20180003372 CHAPTER 163 CRITERIA 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 224 Attachment: Petition_Application PL20180003372-CPSS-19-2 (9725 : Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 - GMPA) Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 GMPA Florida Statutes Compliance Page 1 of 2 Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 GMPA Chapter 163.3167(9), 163.3177(1), 163.3177(6) & 163.3184 Chapter 163.3167(9): Each local government shall address in its comprehensive plan, as enumerated in this chapter, the water supply sources necessary to meet and achieve the existing and projected water use demand for the established planning period, considering the applicable plan developed pursuant to s. 373.709. The proposed GMP amendment does not increase approved density or intensity, and as noted in the pre-application meeting notes, there will be no commercial development on Lots 5 and 6. The residential development, as intended through this petition and companion PUDA application (PL20180003366), will utilize existing and available public infrastructure including potable water. The amendment is in compliance with this section of the Florida Statutes. 163.3177(1) & 163.3177(6): (1) The comprehensive plan shall provide the principles, guidelines, standards, and strategies for the orderly and balanced future economic, social, physical, environmental, and fiscal development of the area that reflects community commitments to implement the plan and its elements. These principles and strategies shall guide future decisions in a consistent manner and shall contain programs and activities to ensure comprehensive plans are implemented. The sections of the comprehensive plan containing the principles and strategies, generally provided as goals, objectives, and policies, shall describe how the local government’s programs, activities, and land development regulations will be initiated, modified, or continued to implement the comprehensive plan in a consistent manner. It is not the intent of this part to require the inclusion of implementing regulations in the comprehensive plan but rather to require identification of those programs, activities, and land development regulations that will be part of the strategy for implementing the comprehensive plan and the principles that describe how the programs, activities, and land development regulations will be carried out. The plan shall establish meaningful and predictable standards for the use and development of land and provide meaningful guidelines for the content of more detailed land development and use regulations. As outlined in this application, the proposed amendments comply with the framework set forth in the Growth Management Plan. The amendments provide meaningful and predictable standards as intended by this statute and is therefore in compliance. (6) In addition to the requirements of subsections (1)-(5), the comprehensive plan shall include the following elements The petition provides for the application requirements and analysis necessary for the request. The request is limited to allowing residential uses on the bottom floor of buildings on Lots 5 and 6. Currently 58 dwelling units are approved for Lots 5 and 6, and the Applicant is not requesting to increase or decrease the approved density. 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 225 Attachment: Petition_Application PL20180003372-CPSS-19-2 (9725 : Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 - GMPA) Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 GMPA Florida Statutes Compliance Page 2 of 2 163.3184: Process for adoption of comprehensive plan or plan amendment. The proposed small-scale GMP amendment will be processed in accordance with the guidelines provided in F.S. Section 163.3184 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 226 Attachment: Petition_Application PL20180003372-CPSS-19-2 (9725 : Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 - GMPA) VANDERBILT WAY COMMONS LOTS 5 & 6 GMPA CCPC PACKAGE PL20180003372 PRE-APPLICATION MEETING NOTES 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 227 Attachment: Petition_Application PL20180003372-CPSS-19-2 (9725 : Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 - GMPA) 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 228 Attachment: Petition_Application PL20180003372-CPSS-19-2 (9725 : Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 - GMPA) 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 229 Attachment: Petition_Application PL20180003372-CPSS-19-2 (9725 : Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 - GMPA) 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 230 Attachment: Petition_Application PL20180003372-CPSS-19-2 (9725 : Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 - GMPA) 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 231 Attachment: Petition_Application PL20180003372-CPSS-19-2 (9725 : Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 - GMPA) 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 232 Attachment: Petition_Application PL20180003372-CPSS-19-2 (9725 : Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 - GMPA) 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 233 Attachment: Petition_Application PL20180003372-CPSS-19-2 (9725 : Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 - GMPA) 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 234 Attachment: Petition_Application PL20180003372-CPSS-19-2 (9725 : Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 - GMPA) 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 235 Attachment: Petition_Application PL20180003372-CPSS-19-2 (9725 : Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 - GMPA) 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 236 Attachment: Petition_Application PL20180003372-CPSS-19-2 (9725 : Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 - GMPA) 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 237 Attachment: Petition_Application PL20180003372-CPSS-19-2 (9725 : Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 - GMPA) 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 238 Attachment: Petition_Application PL20180003372-CPSS-19-2 (9725 : Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 - GMPA) 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 239 Attachment: Petition_Application PL20180003372-CPSS-19-2 (9725 : Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 - GMPA) VANDERBILT WAY COMMONS LOTS 5 & 6 GMPA CCPC PACKAGE PL20180003372 EXECUTED AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 240 Attachment: Petition_Application PL20180003372-CPSS-19-2 (9725 : Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 - GMPA) 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 241 Attachment: Petition_Application PL20180003372-CPSS-19-2 (9725 : Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 - GMPA) VANDERBILT WAY COMMONS LOTS 5 & 6 GMPA CCPC PACKAGE PL20180003372 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP INFORMATION 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 242 Attachment: Petition_Application PL20180003372-CPSS-19-2 (9725 : Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 - GMPA) VANDERBILT COMMONS LOTS 5 & 6 GMPA DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST VANDERBILT WAY APARTMENTS LLC Manager - Ralph R. Cioffi, Jr. Members/Ownership % - • Vandy Way LLC - 70% Manager - Ralph R. Cioffi, Jr. Member/Ownership % - Ralph R. Cioffi, Jr. - 100% • 227 Partners LLC - 20% Authorized Members - Juergen F. Mross and Lori A. Mross • IRC Investments LLC - 10% Manager - IRC Management, LLC Manager of Manager - Rainier N. Filthaut 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 243 Attachment: Petition_Application PL20180003372-CPSS-19-2 (9725 : Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 - GMPA) VANDERBILT WAY COMMONS LOTS 5 & 6 GMPA CCPC PACKAGE PL20180003372 PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANTS 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 244 Attachment: Petition_Application PL20180003372-CPSS-19-2 (9725 : Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 - GMPA) Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 GMPA Exhibit I.D Professional Consultants Planning: Lindsay F. Robin & Alexis V. Crespo, AICP Waldrop Engineering, P.A. 28100 Bonita Grande Drive #305 Bonita Springs, FL 34135 239.405.7777 239.405.7899 fax Lindsay.robin@waldropengineering.com Alexis.crespo@waldropengineering.com Land Use Attorney: Jeff Wright, Esq. Henderson, Franklin, Starnes & Holt P.A. 8889 Pelican Bay Blvd., Suite 400 Naples, FL 34108 239.344.1371 239.344.1508 fax jeff.wright@henlaw.com Transportation: Norman J. Trebilcock, AICP, PE Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 1205 Piper Boulevard, Suite 202 Naples, FL 34110 239.566.9551 ntrebilcock@trebilcock.biz Engineering: Jack Morris, PE Waldrop Engineering, P.A. 28100 Bonita Grande Drive #305 Bonita Springs, FL 34135 239.405.7777 239.405.7899 fax jack.morris@waldropengineering.com Architect: Nathalie White Studio+ 12271 Towne Lake Drive Fort Myers, FL 33913 239.271.4018 nathaliew@wearestudioplus.com 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 245 Attachment: Petition_Application PL20180003372-CPSS-19-2 (9725 : Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 - GMPA) VANDERBILT WAY COMMONS LOTS 5 & 6 GMPA CCPC PACKAGE PL20180003372 FUTURE LAND USE MAP 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 246 Attachment: Petition_Application PL20180003372-CPSS-19-2 (9725 : Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 - GMPA) ² Vanderbilt Commons MPUD/GMPAFUTURE LAND USE MAP Estates Designation Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict Vanderbilt Beach/Collier BlvdCommercial Subdistrict Vanderbilt WayApartments, LLC Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye. Earthstar Geographics, NES/Airbus DS,USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community 0 500 1,000250 Feet Wolfe Road Collier Boulevard/CR 951Mission Hills Drive Vanderbilt Beach Road 7th Avenue NW 5th Avenue NW Collier Boulevard/CR 951Pristine Drive9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 247 Attachment: Petition_Application PL20180003372-CPSS-19-2 (9725 : Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 - GMPA) VANDERBILT WAY COMMONS LOTS 5 & 6 GMPA CCPC PACKAGE PL20180003372 300-FOOT RADIUS MAP 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 248 Attachment: Petition_Application PL20180003372-CPSS-19-2 (9725 : Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 - GMPA) ² Vanderbilt Beach Road 7th Avenue NWPristine DriveCollier Boulevard/CR 951Wolfe Road 0 500250 Feet Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye. Earthstar Geographics, NES/Airbus DS,USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community Preserve Zoned: PUD Use: Multi-Family Residential (Portofino Falls) Zoned: RPUD Use: Single-Family Residential (Black Bear Ridge) Zoned: PUD Use: Existing Commercial (Mission Hills Shopping Center) Zoned: Estate Use: Single-Family Residential (Golden Gate Estates) Subject Property 2.5+/- Acres Existing Zoning: Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) Existing FLUE: Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict Existing Use: Vacant and Developed Commercial Adjacent Property North Zoning: RPUD Use: Preserve (Black Bear Ridge) South Zoning: MPUD Use: Right-of-Way (Vanderbilt Beach Road) Vacant Commercial (Vanderbilt Commons MPUD) East Zoning: PUD Use: Right-of-Way (Buckstone Drive) Commercial (Mission Hills PUD) West Zoning: MPUD Use: Water Management Area (Vanderbilt Commons MPUD) 300-Foot Radius Zoned: MPUD Use: Water Management Area (Vanderbilt Commons MPUD)Buckstone DriveVanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 GMPAExisting Land Use & ZoningWithin a Radius of 300 Feet Vanderbilt WayApartments, LLC Exhibit V.A.-3 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 249 Attachment: Petition_Application PL20180003372-CPSS-19-2 (9725 : Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 - GMPA) VANDERBILT WAY COMMONS LOTS 5 & 6 GMPA CCPC PACKAGE PL20180003372 CURRENT ZONING MAP 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 250 Attachment: Petition_Application PL20180003372-CPSS-19-2 (9725 : Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 - GMPA) ² Vanderbilt Beach Road Collier Boulevard/CR 9517th Avenue NWPristine Drive5th Avenue NW Collier Boulevard/CR 951Mission Hills Drive Wolfe Road Vanderbilt Commons MPUD/GMPACURRENT ZONING MAP PUD A Vanderbilt WayApartments, LLC RPUD MPUD 0 500 1,000250 Feet Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye. Earthstar Geographics, NES/Airbus DS,USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community E A Rural AgriculturalE EstatePUD Planned Unit DevelopmentRPUD Residential Planned Unit DevelopmentMPUD Mixed Use Planned Unit Development Zoning Districts PUD MPUD PUD MPUD RPUD RPUD PUD MPUD RPUD A 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 251 Attachment: Petition_Application PL20180003372-CPSS-19-2 (9725 : Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 - GMPA) VANDERBILT WAY COMMONS LOTS 5 & 6 GMPA CCPC PACKAGE PL20180003372 ADDRESSING CHECKLIST 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 252 Attachment: Petition_Application PL20180003372-CPSS-19-2 (9725 : Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 - GMPA) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 ADDRESSING CHECKLIST Please complete the following and email to GMD_Addressing@colliergov.net or fax to the Operations Division at 239-252-5724 or submit in person to the Addressing Section at the above address. Form must be signed by Addressing personnel prior to pre-application meeting, please allow 3 days for processing. Not all items will apply to every project. Items in bold type are required. FOLIO NUMBERS MUST BE PROVIDED. Forms older than 6 months will require additional review and approval by the Addressing Section. PETITION TYPE (Indicate type below, complete a separate Addressing Checklist for each Petition type) BL (Blasting Permit) BD (Boat Dock Extension) Carnival/Circus Permit CU (Conditional Use) EXP (Excavation Permit) FP (Final Plat LLA (Lot Line Adjustment) PNC (Project Name Change) PPL (Plans & Plat Review) PSP (Preliminary Subdivision Plat) PUD Rezone RZ (Standard Rezone) SDP (Site Development Plan) SDPA (SDP Amendment) SDPI (Insubstantial Change to SDP) SIP (Site Im provement Plan) SIPI (Insubstantial Change to SIP) SNR (Street Name Change) SNC (Street Name Change – Unplatted) TDR (Transfer of Development Rights) VA (Variance) VRP (Vegetation Removal Permit) VRSFP (Vegetation Removal & Site Fill Permit) OTHER LEGAL DESCRIPT ION of subject property or properties (copy of lengthy description may be attached) FOLIO (Property ID) NUMBER(s) of above (attach to, or associate with, legal description if more than one) STREET ADDRESS or ADDRESSES (as applicable, if already assigned) PROPOSED STREET NAMES (if applicable) SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NUMBER (for existing projects/sites only) LOCATION MAP must be attached showing exact location of project/site in relation to nearest public road right- of-way PROPOSED PROJECT NAME (if applicable) SDP - or AR or PL # SURVEY (copy - needed only for unplatted properties) CURRENT PROJECT NAME (if applicable) Rev. 6/9/2017 Page 1 of 2 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 253 Attachment: Petition_Application PL20180003372-CPSS-19-2 (9725 : Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 - GMPA) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 Please Return Approved Checklist By: Email Personally picked up Applicant Name: Signature on Addressing Checklist does not constitute Project and/or Street Name approval and is subject to further review by the Operations Division. FOR STAFF USE ONLY Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Approved by: Date: Updated by: Date: IF OLDER THAN 6 MONTHS, FORM MUST BE UPDATED OR NEW FORM SUBMITTED Fax Email/Fax:Phone: Project or development names proposed for, or already appearing in, condominium documents (if application; indicate whether proposed or existing) Rev. 6/9/2017 Page 2 of 2 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 254 Attachment: Petition_Application PL20180003372-CPSS-19-2 (9725 : Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 - GMPA) LOCATION MAP 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 255 Attachment: Petition_Application PL20180003372-CPSS-19-2 (9725 : Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 - GMPA) VANDERBILT WAY COMMONS LOTS 5 & 6 GMPA CCPC PACKAGE PL20180003372 LIST IDENTIFYING ALL PROPERTY OWNERS & PARTIES OF THE CORPORATION 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 256 Attachment: Petition_Application PL20180003372-CPSS-19-2 (9725 : Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 - GMPA) 2/27/2019 Detail by Entity Name http://search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/CorporationSearch/SearchResultDetail?inquirytype=EntityName&directionType=Initial&searchNameOrder=VANDERBI…2/2 Document Number FEI/EIN Number Date Filed State Status Detail by Entity Name Florida Limited Liability Company VANDERBILT WAY APARTMENTS, LLC Filing Information L18000137672 NONE 06/05/2018 FL ACTIVE Principal Address 2950 TAMIAMI TRAIL NORTH, SUITE 200 NAPLES, FL 34103 Changed: 07/11/2018 Mailing Address 2950 TAMIAMI TRAIL NORTH, SUITE 200 NAPLES, FL 34103 Changed: 07/11/2018 Registered Agent Name & Address DENTI, KEVIN A, ESQ 2180 IMMOKALEE RD STE 316 NAPLES, FL 34110 Authorized Person(s) Detail Name & Address Title MGR CIOFFI, JR, RALPH R 2950 TAMIAMI TRAIL NORTH, SUITE 200 NAPLES, FL 34103 Annual Reports No Annual Reports Filed Document Images 06/05/2018 -- Florida Limited Liability View image in PDF format Florida Department of State, Division of Corporations 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 257 Attachment: Petition_Application PL20180003372-CPSS-19-2 (9725 : Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 - GMPA) VANDERBILT WAY COMMONS LOTS 5 & 6 GMPA CCPC PACKAGE PL20180003372 TRAFFIC STATEMENT OF NO ADDITIONAL IMPACTS 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 258 Attachment: Petition_Application PL20180003372-CPSS-19-2 (9725 : Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 - GMPA) Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA  2800 Davis Boulevard, Suite 200  Naples, FL 34104 Phone 239-566-9551  ntrebilcock@trebilcock.biz  www.trebilcock.biz March 6, 2019 Ray Bellows Zoning Planning Manager Collier County Zoning Services 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 SUBJECT: Vanderbilt Commons PUD Lots 5 and 6-- PL20180003372; PL20180003366 Transportation Statement of No Additional Impacts Dear Mr. Bellows: The purpose of this letter is to provide an evaluation and statement of no additional transportation impacts and to clarify Institute of Transportation Engineers Land Use Codes (ITE LUC) as compared to Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) codes identified as allowable uses for the project. The proposed PUD land uses are not changing, just the elimination of the requirement regarding commercial on the first floor of the residential buildings. This does not change the project’s calculated traffic impact, since the project will still be mixed use and benefit from the applicable internal capture values assumed in the traffic analysis. With respect to SIC codes, the following table covers the SIC and ITE LUC’s that may likely be used for the lots: Development ITE Land Use (Relevant SIC in Parenthesis) ITE Land Use Code Residential Condominiums/Townhouses/Apartment (Not Applicable) 220; 230 Commercial General Office (73XX, 63XX, 86XX, 87XX, 9XXX, 65XX, and 62XX approved uses) 710 Medical Office (8011 through 8049) 720 Shopping Center (all PUD permitted uses possible—typical for a shopping center—as an inline/outparcel use—refer to PUD for applicable SIC Codes) 820 Let me know if you have any questions, or need anything else. Sincerely, Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Norman J. Trebilcock, AICP, P.E. President 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 259 Attachment: Petition_Application PL20180003372-CPSS-19-2 (9725 : Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 - GMPA) VANDERBILT WAY COMMONS LOTS 5 & 6 GMPA CCPC PACKAGE PL20180003372 PROPOSED TEXT 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 260 Attachment: Petition_Application PL20180003372-CPSS-19-2 (9725 : Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 - GMPA) EXHIBIT IV.B. – PROPOSED TEXT * * * * * * * * * * * * * 9. Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict This Subdistrict is located in the northwest quadrant of the intersection of Vanderbilt Beach Road and Collier Boulevard, consisting of approximately 47.94 acres, comprised of 33.45 acres of land for the existing area and 14.49 acres of land for the expansion area, as depicted on the Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict Map. The intent of the Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict is to provide convenient shopping, personal services and employment for neighboring and Golden Gate Estates residential areas, as well as to promote mixed-use development (residential uses over commercial uses). The Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict will reduce driving distances for neighboring and Golden Gate Estates residents, assist in minimizing the road network required, and reduce traffic impacts in this part of Collier County. This Subdistrict is further intended to create a neighborhood focal point and any development within this Subdistrict will be designed in a manner to be compatible with the existing and future residential and institutional development in this neighborhood. To encourage mixed use projects, this Subdistrict also permits residential development when located in a mixed-use building (residential uses over commercial uses). Such residential development is allowed at a maximum density of sixteen (16) dwelling units per acre; the gross acreage of the project is used in calculating residential density. Residential buildings shall be limited to three (3) stories, including parking, which may also include commercial uses if such uses are located on the first floor, on the cross-hatched area of the Subdistrict coinciding with Lots 5 and 6 of the Vanderbilt Commons Subdivision as shown on the Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Blvd. Commercial Subdistrict inset map. Retail uses shall be limited to single-story. Financial services and offices shall be limited to three (3) stories. A combination of these uses in a single building ‒ financial services and/or offices over retail uses – shall be limited to three (3) stories. Also, mixed-use buildings, containing residential uses over commercial uses, shall be limited to three (3) stories. All principal buildings shall be set back a minimum of one (1) foot from the Subdistrict boundaries for each foot of building height. Development within each project or yet to be established Planned Unit Development (PUD) District shall be required to have common site, signage and building architectural elements. Each project or PUD District shall provide for both pedestrian and vehicular interconnections with abutting properties, where feasible. Rezonings are encouraged to be in the form of a PUD zoning district, which must contain development and design standards to ensure that all commercial uses will be compatible with neighboring residential and institutional uses. In addition to retail uses and other uses permitted in the Plan, financial institutions, business services, and professional and medical offices shall be permitted. A total of 400,000 square feet of gross leasable floor area is permitted within this Subdistrict as follows: Development intensity for the existing area (Mission Hills Planned Unit Development) of this Subdistrict shall be limited to a maximum of 200,000 square feet of gross leasable floor area. 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 261 Attachment: Petition_Application PL20180003372-CPSS-19-2 (9725 : Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 - GMPA) Within the 14.49-acre expansion area, 200,000 square feet of gross leasable floor area for commercial land uses is permitted. The following land uses shall not be permitted: gas stations, convenience stores with gas pumps, fast food restaurants with drive-through lanes, and tire stores. * * * * * * * * * * * * * 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 262 Attachment: Petition_Application PL20180003372-CPSS-19-2 (9725 : Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 - GMPA) VANDERBILT WAY COMMONS LOTS 5 & 6 GMPA CCPC PACKAGE PL20180003372 REVISED SUBDISTRICT INSET MAP 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 263 Attachment: Petition_Application PL20180003372-CPSS-19-2 (9725 : Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 - GMPA) VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD 7th Avenue NW COLLIER BOULEVARD (C.R. 951)WOLFE ROAD VANDERBILT BEACH / COLLIER BOULEVARD COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT PREPARED BY: WALDROP ENGINEERING, P.A.DATE: 3/2019 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 0 500250 SCALE IN FEET VANDERBILT WAY BUCKSTONE DRIVEINSET MAP PRISTINE DRIVE²LEGEND Original Subdistrict Subdistrict Expansion 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 264 Attachment: Petition_Application PL20180003372-CPSS-19-2 (9725 : Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 - GMPA) VANDERBILT WAY COMMONS LOTS 5 & 6 GMPA CCPC PACKAGE PL20180003372 AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLIANCE – NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 265 Attachment: Petition_Application PL20180003372-CPSS-19-2 (9725 : Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 - GMPA) 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 266 Attachment: Petition_Application PL20180003372-CPSS-19-2 (9725 : Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 - GMPA) May 16, 2019 RE: Vanderbilt Commons PUDA-PL20180003366 GMPA-PL20180003372 Dear Property Owner: Please be advised that Waldrop Engineering, P.A. on behalf of Vanderbilt Way Apartments, LLC has filed two (2) concurrent applications to Collier County. These applications seek approval of: (1) a PUD amendment for the Vanderbilt Commons Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) to remove the requirement to provide commercial uses on the first floor of the mixed-use building on Lots 5 and 6, and add one (1) deviation relating to building perimeter plantings; AND (2) a Growth Management Plan amendment (GMPA) to allow residential uses on the first floor of buildings on Lots 5 and 6. The GMPA does not request to increase density or intensity and no changes made affect any other portion of the MPUD. The subject property totals 14.49+/- acres and is generally located immediately north of Vanderbilt Beach Road, approximately ¼ of a mile west of Collier Boulevard in unincorporated Collier County, Florida. In compliance with the Land Development Code requirements, a Neighborhood Information Meeting will be held to provide you an opportunity to hear a presentation about this application and ask questions. The Neighborhood Information Meeting will be held on Monday, June 3rd, 2019 at 5:30 p.m. at the Greater Naples Fire Rescue Headquarters, 14575 Collier Blvd., Naples, FL 34119. Should you have questions prior to the meeting, please contact me directly at (239) 405-7777 ext. 2232, or lindsay.robin@waldropengineering.com. Sincerely, WALDROP ENGINEERING, P.A. Lindsay F. Robin, MPA Project Planner *Please note that Greater Naples Fire Rescue does not sponsor or endorse this program. 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 267 Attachment: Petition_Application PL20180003372-CPSS-19-2 (9725 : Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 - GMPA) PL20180003366 500' 5/7/2019 Site: Vanderbilt Commons MPUD 1 NAME1 NAME2 NAME3 NAME4 NAME5 NAME6 7205 VANDERBILT WAY LLC PTA-CS# 5406 PO BOX 320099 ALEXANDRIA, VA 22320---0 ABREU, MILAGROS PO BOX 117 KEASBEY, NJ 08832---117 ALLEN, MARCUS A & MARY L 7347 ACORN WAY NAPLES, FL 34119---8091 ANDREEV, BORISLAV VIOLETA ANDREEV 158 RANKIN CRES TORONTO M6P 4H9 AVENOSO, DONALD G 7355 ACORN WAY NAPLES, FL 34119---0 BARRIOS, HARVY E NUVIA AGUILERA DE BARRIOS 7029 AMBROSIA LN APT 606 NAPLES, FL 34119---9651 BCNMD INC 2600 S DOUGLAS ROAD SUITE #510 CORAL GABLES, FL 33134---0 BCNMD INC 2600 S DOUGLAS ROAD #510 CORAL GABLES, FL 33134---0 BCNMD INC 2600 S DOUGLAS ROAD #510 CORAL GABLES, FL 33134---0 BCNMD INC 2600 S DOUGLAS ROAD #510 CORAL GABLES, FL 33134---0 BEADLE, RYAN J & TONYA 7359 ACORN WAY NAPLES, FL 34119---0 BLACK BEAR RIDGE PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION INC % CARDINAL PROPERTY MGMT 4670 CARDINAL WAY STE 302 NAPLES, FL 34112---0 BLACK BEAR RIDGE PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION INC % CARDINAL PROPERTY MGMT 4670 CARDINAL WAY STE 302 NAPLES, FL 34112---0 BLACK BEAR RIDGE PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION INC % CARDINAL PROPERTY MGMT 4670 CARDINAL WAY STE 302 NAPLES, FL 34112---0 BLACK BEAR RIDGE PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION INC % CARDINAL PROPERTY MGMT 4670 CARDINAL WAY STE 302 NAPLES, FL 34112---0 BLACK BEAR RIDGE PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION INC % CARDINAL PROPERTY MGMT 4670 CARDINAL WAY STE 302 NAPLES, FL 34112---0 BLACK BEAR RIDGE PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION INC % CARDINAL PROPERTY MGMT 4670 CARDINAL WAY STE 302 NAPLES, FL 34112---1900 BLACK BEAR RIDGE PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION INC % CARDINAL PROPERTY MGMT 4670 CRDINAL WAY STE 302 NAPLES, FL 34112---0 BLACK BEAR RIDGE PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION INC %CARDINAL PROPERTY MGMT 4670 CARDINAL WAY STE 302 NAPLES, FL 34112---0 BNEI RIVKAH GROUP LLC 156 DUFFY AVENUE HICKSVILLE, NY 11801---0 BOTIE, PHILIP KERRY MINER 4 RYDER AVE DIX HILLS, NY 11746---6107 CARUS, CARLOS M & KAREM 7070 VENICE WAY #2903 NAPLES, FL 34119---0 COLLIER CNTY % OFC OF COLLIER CNTY ATTORNEY 3299 TAMIAMI TRL E HARMON TURNER BLDG 8TH FL NAPLES, FL 34112---0 COLLIER CNTY % OFFICE OF COUNTY ATTORNEY 3299 TAMIAMI TRL E STE 800 NAPLES, FL 34112---5749 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112---0 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112---0 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112---0 COLLIER COUNTY 3301 TAMIAMI TRAIL E NAPLES, FL 34112---0 CONTI FAMILY RES TRUST 20 NAUGHTON DRIVE RICHMOND HILL L4C 4M7 CUBERO, ROY 1504 BAY ROAD #2408 MIAMI BEACH, FL 33139---0 DORGAN, CHRISTOPHER P FABRIENA A DORGAN 7367 ACORN WAY NAPLES, FL 34119---9611 DORSEY, STEPHEN M SUSAN SERRA DORSEY 17 TIFFANY PL SARATOGA SPRINGS, NY 12866---9059 DUPRE, JAMES 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 EASTMAN TR, JULIE MAE 7050 AMBROSIA LN APT 3408 NAPLES, FL 34119---9630 EBICADO LLC 250 SUNNY ISLES BLVD BLDG 3 APT 1905 SUNNY ISLES, FL 33160---0 EDM INVESTMENT HOLDINGS LLC 3300 LAUREL OAK ST FT LAUDERDALE, FL 33312---6396 EDM INVESTMENT HOLDINGS LLC 3300 LAUREL OAK ST FT LAUDERDALE, FL 33312---6396 EDM INVESTMENT HOLDINGS LLC 3300 LAUREL OAK ST FT LAUDERDALE, FL 33312---6396 EDM INVESTMENT HOLDINGS LLC 3300 LAUREL OAK ST FT LAUDERDALE, FL 33312---6396 EMERITUS INVESTMENTS INC 2600 S DOUGLAS RD SUITE 510 CORAL GABLES, FL 33134---0 FALLS OF PORTOFINO MASTER HOA INC C/O ASSOC LAW GROUP P L 1200 BRICKELL AVENUE PH 2000 MIAMI, FL 33131---0 FLYNN LIVING TRUST 6209 WINNEQUAH RD MONONA, WI 53716---3461 FONTANA TR, BUDD & MARION BUDD & MARION FONTANA L/TRUST UTD 01/20/2011 4180 5TH AVE NW NAPLES, FL 34119---1500 FUCHS REVOCABLE TRUST 7351 ACORN WAY NAPLES, FL 34119---9611 GILMORE, BRUCE & CRISTINA 4281 7TH AVE NW NAPLES, FL 34119---0 GIMENEZ, TEODORO-& MILDRED 5530 RIDGE XING HANOVER PARK, IL 60133---5369 IGLESIAS, NARCISA 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 J & C L MAYNARD JT TRUST 7362 ACORN WAY NAPLES, FL 34119---0 J L PHIPPS D D S LOVING TRUST 521 ERIE CT BOWLING GREEN, OH 43402---2745 KEAGY, DOROTHY 7327 ACORN WAY NAPLES, FL 34119---0 KERRY A NICI GIFTING TRUST 1185 IMMOKALEE RD STE 110 NAPLES, FL 34110---4806 KUPEL, GEORGE W & MARIANNE K 7342 ACORN WAY NAPLES, FL 34119---0 LANG, ANN WEBER & TIMOTHY W 4161 7TH AVE NW NAPLES, FL 34119---1521 LOT 3 VANDERBILT COMMONS LLC % WELSH CO FL INC 2950 N TRAIL STE 200 NAPLES, FL 34103---0 MANOO, HAROLD 1187 OLD COLONY ROAD OAKVILLE L6M1J1 POList_500_PL20180003366 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 268 Attachment: Petition_Application PL20180003372-CPSS-19-2 (9725 : Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 - GMPA) PL20180003366 500' 5/7/2019 Site: Vanderbilt Commons MPUD 2 MARTIN, ROBERT E MARY ELIZABETH ROGAN 7330 ACORN WAY NAPLES, FL 34119---0 MAUSEN, JOHN C ROBERT E MAUSEN 1086 FOREST LAKES DR #303 NAPLES, FL 34105---0 MAUSEN, ROBERT E & GEORGINA M 4355 7TH AVE NW NAPLES, FL 34119---1525 MCA PORTOFINO NAPLES LLC 5201 NW 77 AVENUE #400 MIAMI, FL 33166---0 MCA PORTOFINO NAPLES LLC 5201 NW 77 AVENUE #400 MIAMI, FL 33166---0 MCA PORTOFINO NAPLES LLC 5201 NW 77 AVENUE #400 MIAMI, FL 33166---0 MCA PORTOFINO NAPLES LLC 5201 NW 77 AVENUE #400 MIAMI, FL 33166---0 MCA PORTOFINO NAPLES LLC 5201 NW 77 AVENUE #400 MIAMI, FL 33166---0 MENDAX, SCOTT 7371 ACORN WAY NAPLES, FL 34119---9611 MISSION HILLS STATION LLC 11501 NORTHLAKE DRIVE CINCINNATI, OH 45249---0 NAZARIAN, CHRISTINE 7060 VENICE WAY APT 3104 NAPLES, FL 34119---9626 NISTOR, JOHN J & DIANE E 4331 7TH AVE NW NAPLES, FL 34119---1525 NORBERTO JR, FRANK & DENNINE 7326 ACORN WAY NAPLES, FL 34119---9610 NOSSEN ROBERT P & FRANCES 7335 ACORN WAY NAPLES, FL 34119---8091 NUNES, NORBERTO A 3345 27TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34117---7141 O'DONNELL, PAUL F 7358 ACORN WAY S NAPLES, FL 34119---0 OZBAY, EREN 5361 CHERRY WOOD DRIVE NAPLES, FL 34119---0 OZBAY, ERHAN 5361 CHERRY WOOD DRIVE NAPLES, FL 34119---0 PIAZZA, SALVATORE & ANNA G 3765 HELMSMAN DR NAPLES, FL 34120---0 POLLAK, LAURA E JEFFREY A PETRINITZ 7346 ACORN WAY NAPLES, FL 34119---0 POPE FAMILY TRUST 7350 ACORN WAY NAPLES, FL 34119---9610 PRD OWNER LLC % PROFESSIONAL RESOURCE DEV PO BOX 768 EFFINGHAM, IL 62401---0 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 POList_500_PL20180003366 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 269 Attachment: Petition_Application PL20180003372-CPSS-19-2 (9725 : Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 - GMPA) PL20180003366 500' 5/7/2019 Site: Vanderbilt Commons MPUD 3 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 POList_500_PL20180003366 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 270 Attachment: Petition_Application PL20180003372-CPSS-19-2 (9725 : Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 - GMPA) PL20180003366 500' 5/7/2019 Site: Vanderbilt Commons MPUD 4 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 R J FAY & J D FAY REV/L/TRUST 4191 7TH AVE NW NAPLES, FL 34119---1521 REFERENCE ONLY FALLS OF PORTOFINO CONDOMINIUM NO 1, THE REFERENCE ONLY FALLS OF PORTOFINO CONDOMINIUM NO 2, THE REFERENCE ONLY FALLS OF PORTOFINO CONDOMINIUM NO 5, THE REFERENCE ONLY FALLS OF PORTOFINO CONDOMINIUM NO 6, THE REYES, CRISTOBAL & LOYDA 110 9TH ST SW NAPLES, FL 34117---0 SCHMADER, JOHN F VIRGINIA M ELLIOTT 7323 ACORN WAY NAPLES, FL 34119---9625 SHALOM, YEHIEL SAR 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 SUN, WEIYONG QIUYAN KONG 210 STOKES FARM RD FRANKLIN LAKES, NJ 07417---0 SUNCOAST SCHOOLS FED CR UNION ATTN: CINDY CURTIS 6801 E HILLSBOROUGH AVE TAMPA, FL 33610---4110 TABOR, DONALD J & AGNES H 4241 7TH AVE NW NAPLES, FL 34119---1523 TERIMAKI LLC 175 SW 7TH STREET STE 1611 MIAMI, FL 33130---0 THE FALLS OF PORTOFINO LAND TRUST I 1615 S CONGRESS AVENUE STE 200 DELRAY BEACH, FL 33435---0 UNIVERSAL PROPERTY LLC 175 SW 7 STREET STE 1611 MIAMI, FL 33130---0 UNIVERSAL PROPERTY LLC 175 SW 7 STREET STE 1611 MIAMI, FL 33130---0 UNIVERSAL PROPERTY LLC 175 SW 7TH STREET STE 1611 MIAMI, FL 33130---0 VANDERBILT COMMONS OWNERS' ASSOCIATION INC 2950 TAMIAMI TRL N #200 NAPLES, FL 34103---0 VANDERBILT COMMONS I TRUST 2950 TAMIAMI TRAIL N #200 NAPLES, FL 34103---0 VANDERBILT COMMONS OWNERS ASSN INC 2950 9TH STREET NORTH NAPLES, FL 34103---0 VANDERBILT COMMONS OWNERS ASSN INC 2950 9TH STREET NORTH NAPLES, FL 34103---0 VANDERBILT WAY APARTMENTS LLC 2950 TAMIAMI TRL N STE 200 NAPLES, FL 34103---0 VANDERBILT WAY APARTMENTS LLC 2950 TAMIAMI TRL N STE 200 NAPLES, FL 34103---0 VASSAR, ROBERT A & ANGELA C 7343 ACORN WAY NAPLES, FL 34119---9611 VIGILANTE, ANTHONY KATHLEEN WHITE-VIGILANTE 7319 ACORN WAY NAPLES, FL 34119---0 VIVAS, NEOMI FREDDY VIVAS JACOB AGAY 1669 DIPLOMAT DR MIAMI, FL 33179---6404 WEILAND, JAY H & JOAN M 7338 ACORN WAY NAPLES, FL 34119---9610 WILLIAMS, SEAN S & TARA LEE 7363 ACORN WAY NAPLES, FL 34119---9611 WITT, DAVID C & JOYCE E 7334 ACORN WAY NAPLES, FL 34119---9610 WOERZ, GARY F & ANNA G 7315 ACORN WAY NAPLES, FL 34119---0 POList_500_PL20180003366 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 271 Attachment: Petition_Application PL20180003372-CPSS-19-2 (9725 : Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 - GMPA) Published DailyNaples, FL 34110 Affidavit of PublicationState of FloridaCounties of Collier and Lee Before the undersigned they serve as the authority, personally appeared Natalie Zollar who on oath says that she serves as Inside Sales Manager of the Naples Daily News, a daily newspaper published at Naples, in Collier County, Florida; distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida; that the attached copy of the advertising was published in said newspaper on dates listed. Affiant further says that the said Naples Daily News is a newspaper published at Na-ples, in said Collier County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Collier County, Florida; distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida, each day and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Naples, in said Collier County, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper.___________________________________________________________Customer Ad Number Copyline P.O.#_____________________________________________________________________________________ WALDROP ENGINEERING, P.A. 2281189 Neighborhood Meeting Pub DatesMay 17, 2019 _______________________________________(Signature of affiant) Sworn to and subscribed before meThis May 17, 2019 _______________________________________(Signature of affiant) 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 272 Attachment: Petition_Application PL20180003372-CPSS-19-2 (9725 : Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 - GMPA) 14A z FRIDAY, MAY 17, 2019 z NAPLES DAILY NEWS + NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING The public is invited to attend a neighborhood information meeting held by Wa ldrop Engineering,P.A.on behalf of Va nderbilt Wa y Apartments,LLC at the following time and location: Monday,June 3,2019,at 5:30 p.m. Greater Naples Fire Rescue District Headquarters 14575 Collier Blvd,Naples,FL 34119 Please be advised that Va nderbilt Way Apartments,LLC has filed two (2) concurrent applications (PL20180003366 &PL20180003372)with Collier County.These applications are seeking approval of:(1)a PUD amendment for the Va nderbilt Commons Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD)to remove the requirement to provide commercial uses on the first floor of the mixed-use building on Lots 5 and 6,and add one (1)deviation relating to building perimeter plantings;AND (2)a Growth Management Plan amendment (GMPA)to allow residential uses on the first floor of buildings on Lots 5 and 6.The GMPA does not request to increase density or intensity and no changes made affect any other portion of the MPUD. The existing MPUD consists of 14.49+/-acres and is generally located immediately north of Va nderbilt Beach Road,approximately ¼of a mile west of Collier Boulevard in unincorporated Collier County,Florida. WE VALUE YOUR INPUT Business and property owners and residents are welcome to attend the presentation and discuss the project with the owners’representatives and Collier County staff.If you are unable to attend this meeting,but have questions or comments,they can be directed to: Waldrop Engineering,P.A.c/o Lindsay Robin 28100 Bonita Grande Dr.,Suite 305,Bonita Springs,FL 34135 (239)405-7777,ext.2232 OR lindsay.robin@waldropengineering.com *Please note that Greater Naples Fire Rescue District does not sponsor or endorse this program. Summer Rate $38 Includes Green Fee and Cart Quail Run Golf Club 1 Forest Lakes Blvd Naples,FL 34105 239-261-3930 Call for Special Afternoon RatesCallforSpecialAfternoonRates Memberships AvailableMembershipsAvailable MEMB E R FOR A DAY! A HIDDEN JEWEL IN THE MIDDLE OF NAPLES! HindmanAuctions.com Compliment ar y Auction Estimates AMeissen Porcelain Pate sur Pate Four Piece Clock Garniture. Sold for 87,500. 8506th Avenue South Naples,Florida 34102 239.643.4448 naples@hindmanauctions.com hindmanauctions.com/naples SCHEDULE ACOMPLIMENTARY AUCTION ESTIMATE Hindmanspecialists in ourNaples of ficeare currentlyproviding complimentar yauction estimates foryourFineFurniture,Decorative Arts andSilver. Compliment ar y HAPPYHOUR $4 COCKTA ILS $6 APPETIZERS BAR 3PM -8PM 1DINNER PLUS 1GLASS OF WINE $14.99 10711 TA MIAMI TRL AC ROSS FROM TRADER JOE’S 239-260-1075ND-GCI0110434-01 SEAFOOD-STEAKS-PASTA Breakfast-Lunch-Dinner 643-2559 933 Airport Rd.S,Naples,FL 34104 3.5 blks.N.of Davis,1 blk S.of Naples Airport Open Sun 1-5pm •Mon.-Sat.10am-6pm all widths AAAA -EEEE custom fi tting by trained factory sales staff. We help consumers achieve pain-free walking by providing 5 star service, great selection,and superior quality comfort fashion footwear. NAOT,Mephisto,Ta ryn Rose,Helle Comfort,Wolky,Cole Haan, Thierry Rabotin,Beautifeel,Sperry,Ecco,Birkenstock,Florsheim, Finn Comfort,New Balance,SAS,Saucony,Asics,Sebago, Hushpuppy,Te va,Merrell,Fit Flop,Orthaheel,Acorn Slippers and many more... COUPONCOUPON www.shoewarehousenaples.com $25 OFF Must present Coupon at time of purchase. Not valid with any other offer. Expires 5/31/19 *Excludes SAS & Mephisto Kybun and Birkenstock Qual it y Co mfort and Service ND-GCI0177716-10 When Sergio Hostins moved from Maine to Saraso- ta in April of 2018, he planned to visit his aunt often. They talked on the phone every other day, and Hos- tins told Teresa Giani, 66, of West Palm Beach, he was looking forward to only being a few hours in the car away. However, Hostins, 55, was killed by a man he was having a relationship with — about six months after he moved to Florida. “Sergio was very friendly,” Giani said. “He liked to help friends and he helped his family a lot in Brazil. He worked here and all he thought about was his family back in Brazil.” Hostins moved to the U.S. as a child and worked at an Italian restaurant in Maine for 22 years. Then he accepted a job near Sarasota that was opening under the same ownership. “He used to do everything,” Giani said. “He would do plumbing, he was a good painter, he was a good waiter, he was a good electrician. He did it all at the restaurant.” Hostins often sent money to his mother and other family he left behind in Brazil , Giani said. “He was such a good person,” she said. “He was a very happy person, Sergio. He was al- ways making jokes.” On Tuesday, a jury found Daniel Da- venport, 31, of Sarasota, guilty of sec- ond-degree murder. Davenport killed Hostins in October 2018, stole his car and credit cards then dumped his carpet-wrapped body at a home in Naples Park, prosecutors said during the trial. The jury also found Davenport guilty of grand theft of a motor vehicle, 10 counts of fraudulent use of per- sonal identification information and unlawful posses- sion of four or fewer identities. Davenport was arrested in Orlando after eluding authorities for more than a week. He and Hostins met on a social media app for gay men, called Grindr, in September 2018 and developed a relationship. The last time Giani talked with her nephew it seemed like he knew he was in danger, she said. A few days before Hostins’ body was discovered at the home in the 700 block of 102nd Avenue North, he called Giani and asked for her address. Hostins told Giani he needed it so authorities would know to contact her in case something bad happened to him. Hostins was at the Department of Motor Vehicles and didn’t have time to explain what was going on. He told her he would call her back later, Giani said. “I gave the address to him, and those were the last words I heard from him,” Giani said. Hostins told a different family member he was fighting with his boyfriend, who kept asking him for money, Giani said. “What happened to Sergio with this guy, it was just for money,” Giani said. “He just wanted more and more money and then Sergio told him to get out because he needed money to pay his own bills.” It was hard for Giani to sit in the Sarasota courtroom for more than a week so close to her nephew’s killer, she said. “There was a lot, a lot of evidence,” Giani said. “They had so much evidence to prove he was guilty.” Twelfth Judicial Circuit Court Judge Stephen Walk- er deferred Davenport’s sentencing, pending a pre- sentence investigation. Everyone, from Hostins’ family to his boss loved him, Giani said. Homicide victim moved to Fla. shortly before his death Sergio Hostins is pictured inside the Italian restaurant he worked at near Sarasota. Hostins was killed about six months after he moved down to Florida from Maine.COURTESY OF TERESA GIANI Jake Allen Naples Daily News USA TODAY NETWORK - FLORIDA Davenport 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 273 Attachment: Petition_Application PL20180003372-CPSS-19-2 (9725 : Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 - GMPA) VANDERBILT WAY COMMONS LOTS 5 & 6 GMPA CCPC PACKAGE PL20180003372 NIM SYNOPSIS 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 274 Attachment: Petition_Application PL20180003372-CPSS-19-2 (9725 : Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 - GMPA) 1 of 5 Memorandum To: Nancy Gundlach, PLA, AICP From: Lindsay Robin cc: Ralph Cioffi, Vanderbilt Way Apartments, LLC Date: June 14, 2019 Subject: Vanderbilt Commons PUD & GMPA (PL20180003366 & PL20180003372) Neighborhood Information Meeting Synopsis Waldrop Engineering, P.A., and Collier County Staff conducted a Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) on Monday, June 3, 2019. The meeting was held at 5:30 p.m. at the Greater Naples Fire Rescue Headquarters at 14575 Collier Blvd., Naples, Florida 34119. The sign-in sheets are attached as Exhibit “A” and demonstrates 20 residents were in attendance. Handouts were distributed providing the project overview and development regulations. The handouts are attached as Exhibit “B”. Lindsay Robin (Agent) conducted the meeting with introductions of the consultant team and Staff, and an overview of the proposed MPUD amendment application, including the location of the 2.51-acre subject area and the request to remove the requirement to provide commercial uses on the first floor. She also outlined the PUD amendment and Growth Management Plan amendment process and opportunities to provide input at public hearings. Ralph Cioffi, the Applicant, also spoke about the project and provided input on details relating to the development of the site with 58 multi-family dwelling units. Following the Consultant’s presentation, the meeting was opened up to attendees to make comments and ask the consultant team questions regarding the proposed development. The following is a summarized list of the questions asked and responses given. The following comments were asked by attendees. The Applicant’s representatives’ responses are shown in bold. 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 275 Attachment: Petition_Application PL20180003372-CPSS-19-2 (9725 : Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 - GMPA) 2 of 5 Question/Comment 1: Do you have a current drawing of the building and the site plan with the updates?  Response: Elevations of the building are currently worked on and can be provided at a follow-up meeting with the HOA. Question/Comment 2: The main concern is what you are going to do with the lower level, and how it will look.  Response: The first floor will be residential instead of commercial, so the architectural relief, including the entry way and doors will have higher standards, and the proposed landscaping will comply with County’s landscaping standards. We understand your concern. Question/Comment 3: Are you open to changing the plans? What exactly are you intending to do with these two buildings and how many apartment units will they have?  Response: It will be only one building, three (3) stories, with 58 apartments, 2 and 3-bedroom units. Question/Comment 4: Will you have enough parking for the proposed uses? Do you comply with the height limit?  Response: We have the sufficient parking spaces. We also comply with the PUD height limit. Question/Comment 5: There are some issues with the demand for this apartment housing product and the aesthetics of the built environment around it.  Response: We have done supply and demand studies and there is more than enough demand for apartment housing in this area. Question/Comment 6: Would you have any plans to show how the apartments will be structured? The density seems to be quite high for the subject area.  Response: The 2-bedroom units will have an 800-square foot floor plan, and the 3-bedroom units will have a 1,200-square foot floor plan and above. Question/Comment 7: Will you have parking spaces and parking garages? Where will vehicles enter and exit to park their cars?  Response: We have sufficient parking spaces, and the proposed development will have garages for the ground floor units. The garages are located behind the frontage. 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 276 Attachment: Petition_Application PL20180003372-CPSS-19-2 (9725 : Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 - GMPA) 3 of 5 Question/Comment 8: So, there could be potentially more noise coming from the apartments?  Response: There are buffers in place to lessen the impact of noise. There is also the 6-foot masonry wall that is required, buffer plantings that will be in place and the significant preserve area in place directly north of the property. Question/Comment 9: What amenities are you offering to the potential residents of this apartment building? Will they be able to do outdoor activities right in front of their first-floor apartment?  Response: Currently the site plan does not provide any amenities. There will be POA restrictions that all future residents will have to conform to. There will be also be buffers in place, as mentioned previously, between the subject area and the abutting neighbors, including the Black Bear Ridge community. Due to the buffers that will be in place and the expansive preserve are as well as the 6-foot wall, visibility of the site from Black Bear Ridge will be very limited. Question/Comment 10: If you do parking garages, what will happen to the amount of parking spaces needed?  Response: Sufficient parking will be provided. Because no commercial uses are intended in the proposed development, parking requirements associated to those commercial uses will not be required. Question/Comment 11: There is an overall sense in the Black Bear Ridge community that the plans of this development have changed significantly and abruptly since the last time we were announced of this development. We would like for this development to be successful, but we do not believe we have been considered.  Response: We understand, and we would like to be present on any future HOA meetings Black Bear Ridge will host to show you site plans, floor plans and additional information about the proposed development. Question/Comment 12: What type of clientele are you looking to attract for this development? Or at what price point are you looking?  Response: The housing demand for the area is pretty strong, and there is a lot of old housing product in the market. There are some full-amenity housing products being developed on Immokalee Road, but the market is generally positive for housing products of newer standards at average price points. 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 277 Attachment: Petition_Application PL20180003372-CPSS-19-2 (9725 : Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 - GMPA) 4 of 5 Question/Comment 13: There is significant traffic in the area. It is advisable for you to take that into consideration.  Response: We have noted your comment, and believe the County is in process of studying that area. Question/Comment 14: There is significant concerns about having children and infants playing on the first floor.  Response: We cannot restrict residents to be adults only. We have noted your concern. Question/Comment 15: Will there be a play area for children?  Response: At this point, there is no playground area planned for children inside the proposed development. That is something we can consider moving forward designing the site. Question/Comment 16: Are all the apartment units for rent only? What will be the minimum rental period?  Response: All apartment units are for rent. There are two companies that will be managing the property, the front of the house rental management company that collects rent, verifies rental checks, etc. The asset management will be ourselves and we perform management of the building and parcels, including maintenance and landscaping. The minimum rental period will be 12 months. Question/Comment 17: There was a hope within the residential communities for commercial uses in the subject area.  Response: There are commercial uses surrounding the subject area, with multiple tenants, neighborhood stores, etc. Question/Comment 18: Community residents believe that residential uses on first floors of any building will lead to a “spill-over” effect and will negatively impact the aesthetics and quality of life of current residents, such as putting out their lawn chairs, or dog chairs outside the residential premise and into the sidewalks. Additionally, when the PUD was first proposed, it was going to be mixed use development.  Response: We understand the communities concern and would be happy to be on any HOA or community meeting to share additional information regarding the proposed development. 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 278 Attachment: Petition_Application PL20180003372-CPSS-19-2 (9725 : Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 - GMPA) 5 of 5 Question/Comment 19: Will you have balconies on the apartment units?  Response: There will be no balconies on the apartment units. There were no further questions or comments. Ms. Robin thanked the attendees for coming and noted that their contact information is available for those who wished to reach out with any further questions. The meeting concluded at approximately 6:30 p.m. The meeting was recorded per the CD attached as Exhibit “C”. 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 279 Attachment: Petition_Application PL20180003372-CPSS-19-2 (9725 : Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 - GMPA) 9.A.1.dPacket Pg. 280Attachment: Petition_Application PL20180003372-CPSS-19-2 (9725 : Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 - 9.A.1.dPacket Pg. 281Attachment: Petition_Application PL20180003372-CPSS-19-2 (9725 : Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 - Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 PUD - PL20180003366 & PL20180003372 Neighborhood Information Meeting Monday, June 3, 2019 5:30 p.m. PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET Project Size: 2.51+/- Acres Future Land Use: Urban Mixed Use District, Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Blvd. Commercial Subdistrict Current Zoning: Planned Unit Development (PUD) Proposed Zoning: Planned Unit Development (PUD) Approved Density/Uses: 58 dwelling units Proposed Density/Uses: 58 dwelling units Project Requests: (PL20180003372) - Small-scale amendment to the Future Land Use Element, Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict, to remove the requirement to provide first-floor commercial uses with residential on the upper stories. (PL20180003366) PUD Amendment to remove the PUD requirement for commercial uses on the first floor of the mixed use buildings. 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 282 Attachment: Petition_Application PL20180003372-CPSS-19-2 (9725 : Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 - GMPA) Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 PUD DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS COMMERCIAL USES RESIDENTIAL USES Minimum Lot Area 10,000 square feet 10,000 square feet Minimum Lot Width 75 feet (1) 75 feet (1) Front Yard Setback 20 feet 20 feet Side Yard Setback (2) 1-Story 6 feet 6 feet 2-Story 7.5 feet 7.5 feet 3-Story 10 feet 10 feet Rear Yard Setback Principal Structure 15 feet 15 feet Accessory Structure 10 feet 10 feet PUD Boundary Setback Principal Structure BH BH Accessory Structure 10 feet or buffer width 10 feet or buffer width Lake Setback (3) 20 feet or 0' feet 20 feet or 0’ feet Preserve Area Setback Principal Structure 25 feet 25 feet Accessory Structures or Other Site Alterations 10 feet 10 feet Distance Between Structures Main/Principal 1-Story to 1-Story 12 feet 13.5 feet 1-Story to 2-Story 13.5 feet 15 feet 2-Story to 2-Story 15 feet 17.5 feet 2-Story to 3-Story 17.5 feet 20 feet 3-Story to 3-Story 20 feet 12 feet Accessory Structures Same as principal structure Same as principal structure Maximum Height (4) Retail Building 35 feet and 1-story N/A Office Building 42 feet and 3-stories N/A Accessory Building 35 feet 35 feet Residential & Mixed-Use Building (4) 45 feet and 3-stories 45 feet and 3-stories Minimum Floor Area 700 square feet of principal structure on first habitable floor 700 square feet per dwelling unit (1) May be reduced on cul -de-sac lots and lots along the inside and outside of curved streets by 25%. (2) Where fee simple lots are created for each building unit no side yard shall be required between interior units of a unified principal structure. and the side yard shall be measured from the exterior wall(s) of the unified principal structure. 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 283 Attachment: Petition_Application PL20180003372-CPSS-19-2 (9725 : Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 - GMPA) (3) Lake setbacks are measured from the control elevation established for the lake. Lake setbacks can be reduced from 20' to 0' where a stem wall bulkhead or pier is constructed and the requirements of Section 4.02.05 of the LDC are met. (4) Retail uses are limited to the first floor of any building residential uses are limited to the second and third floors of mixed-use buildings (structures with ret ai l or office uses on the first floor and office or residential uses on the second and third floors) Note ‘BH’ refers to building height. 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 284 Attachment: Petition_Application PL20180003372-CPSS-19-2 (9725 : Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 - GMPA) Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 PUD PERMITTED USES A. Permitted Commercial Principal Uses and Structures: 1. Amusement and Recreation Services SIC 7911, except dance halls and discotheques, 7922, 7991. 7999 only for bicycle rental, gymnastics instruction, judo instruction, karate instruction and yoga instruction). 2. Apparel and Accessory Stores (SIC 5611- 5699 except thrift and or surplus stores). 3. Paint, Glass, and Wallpaper Stores (SIC 5231). 4. Business Services (SIC 7311, 7313, 7323, 7331 – 7338, 7361, 7371 — 7379, 7384, 7389 only for service of interior decorating/design, mapmaking, notary public, paralegal service, and Postal Service contract stations). 5. Depository and Non-Depository Institutions (SIC 6021 - 6091). 6. Eating Place (SIC 5812) and Drinking Places (SIC 5813 only cocktail lounges and on-premise consumption of beer, wine and liquor, in conjunction with a restaurant.) No freestanding food stands and or kiosks are permitted. Drinking Places are subject to the locational restrictions described in Section 5.05.01 of the Land Development Code. a. Lots 5 & 6 (as shown on the Vanderbilt Commons Subdivision Plat, recorded in Plat Book 60, Page 31 of the Public Records of Collier County) shall have the following limitations: i. No outdoor seating shall be permitted; ii. The hours of operation for any eating place shall be limited to 6 a.m. - 4 p.m.; iii. Loading and deliveries shall be from the front entrance only; and iv. The consumption of alcohol is not permitted on these Lots. 7. Educational Services (SIC 8211 – 8222, 8243 - 8249, 8299). 8. Food Stores with 5,000 square feet or less of gross floor area in the principal structure (SIC 5411- 5499). 9. General Merchandise Stores with 5,000 square feet or less of gross floor area in the principal structure (SIC 5311 and 5399 except variety stores: single-price point discount, surplus, overstock or liquidation outlets). 10. Hardware stores with 10,000 square feet or less of gross floor area in the principal structure (SIC 5251). 11. Health Services (SIC 8011 - 8049, 8082). 12. Home Furniture, Furnishings and Equipment Stores (SIC 5712 - 5736). 13. Insurance Carriers, Agents, Brokers, and Services with 5,000 square feet or less of gross floor area in the principal structure (SIC 6311- 6399, 6411). 14 . Legal Services (SIC 8111). 15. Membership Organizations (SIC 8611, 8621, 8661 only for offices related to religious organizations). 16. Miscellaneous Repair (SIC 7622, 7629, 7631, 7699 only bicycle repair, camera repair , locksmiths, luggage repair , medical/dental instrument repair, musical instrument repair, piano repair, saw/knife sharpening service, and custom picture framing). 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 285 Attachment: Petition_Application PL20180003372-CPSS-19-2 (9725 : Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 - GMPA) 17. Miscellaneous Retail (SIC 5912, 5921, 5932 antiques only, 5941 - 5949, 5961,5992, 5994 - 5999 (except auction rooms, awning shops, fireworks, flea markets, gravestones, hot tubs, monuments, pawn shops, sales barns, swimming pools, tombstones and whirlpool baths). The sale of swimming pool accessories and supplies is allowable under SIC 5999 but not the sale of swimming pools. 18. Museums and Art Galleries (SIC 8 412). 19. Personal Services ( SIC 7212 only dry-cleaning and laundry drop off and pickup stations, 7221 - 7251, 7291, 7299 (only car title and tag service, diet workshops, tuxedo rental, and tanning salon). 20. Professional Offices, Research, and Management Consulting Services (SIC 8711 - 8743, 8748 ). 21. Public Administration (SIC 9111 - 91 99, 9229, 9311, 9411 and 9431, 9511 - 9532, 9611- 9661, 9221). 22. Real Estate Agents and Managers (SIC 6512, 6531- 6552). 23. Security and Commodity Dealers (SIC 6211 - 6289). 24. Social Services (SIC 8322 only adult day care services, counseling services, and senior citizens associations , 8351). 25. Travel Agencies (SIC 4724). 26. Any other use which is comparable and compatible in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal and the accessory uses, as prescribed by the LDC, shall be heard by the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA). Prior to the approval of any uses, the applicant shall provide public notice in addition to an advertisement for the hearing which shall include a neighborhood information meeting, mailings and signage in the same manner as that required for substantial amendments to a Planned Unit Development. Permitted Residential Principal Uses and Structures : 1. Multi-Family dwellings. 2. Any other use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal and the accessory uses by the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) . Accessory Commercial Uses: 1. Uses and structures that are accessory and incidental to the Permitted Uses within this PUD Document. 2. Caretaker's residences subject to Section 5.03.05 of the Collier County Land Development Code. Accessory Residential 1. Customary residential accessory uses and structures including carports, garages, and storage buildings. 2. Recreational. uses and facilities including swimming pools, hot tubs, volleyball courts, children's playground areas, tot lots, walking paths, picnic areas, clubhouse, verandahs, and basketball/shuffle board courts. 3. Manager's residences and offices, temporary sales trailers, and model unit s. 4. Gatehouse. 5. Essential services, including interim and permanent utility and maintenance facilities. 6. Carports are permitted within parking areas. 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 286 Attachment: Petition_Application PL20180003372-CPSS-19-2 (9725 : Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 - GMPA) PROHIBITED USES 1. Auto stores (SIC 5531, tire dealers, and tire, battery, and accessory dealers - retail, and auto supply stores with service bays, lifts or other facilities for installing such automotive parts). 2. Gasoline service stations, and other facilities with fuel pumps (SIC 5541). 3. Fast food restaurants with drive-through lanes. 4. Any freestanding donation boxes/kiosks. 5. Outdoor amplified sound devices, televisions or live entertainment, with the exception for approved temporary use/event permits as outlined in LDC Section 5.04.01. 6. Adult entertainment and sexually oriented businesses 7. Lots 5 & 6 (as shown on the Vanderbilt Commons Subdivision Plat, recorded in Plat Book 60, Page 31 of the Public Records of Collier County) shall not provide main public access entryways along the northern facades of any proposed building. 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 287 Attachment: Petition_Application PL20180003372-CPSS-19-2 (9725 : Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 - GMPA) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 288 Attachment: Adoption Affidavit_Advertisement (9725 : Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 - GMPA) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 289 Attachment: Adoption Affidavit_Advertisement (9725 : Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 - GMPA) IOA I FRIDAY, JUI.Y 12, 2019 I T{APLES DAILY NEWS .,] NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that the Collier County Plannlng Cohmission will hold a public m€bting on Augusl 1, m19 commencing at 9:q) A.M. in the Boad ot County Commissioners Chamber, Third Floor, County Govornment Center, 3299 East TamiamiT.ail, Naples, FL. The purpose ol the hearing is to conglder AN ORDINANCE AMEN'DING ORDTNANCE NO.89.05, AS AMENDED,TIIE COLLIIR COT,INTY GROWTE MANAGEMENT PI,AN FOR TIIE I'NINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIf,R COT,NTY, FLORIDA, SPECIFICALLY AMEI\'DINC TEE FUTURE LANII USE ELEMEM To REVISE TEE VANDERBILT BEACH/COLLIER BOULEVARD COMMERCIAL SI'BDISTRI T OF TIIE URBAN MDGD USE DISTRICT AS TO LOTS 5 AND 6 OF TEE VANDERBtr]T COMMONS SUBDIYISION ,TO REMO}ts T-EE NEQUIREMENT TO PROVIDE COMMERCIAL USES ON TEE FIRST FLOOR wlTE RESIDENTIAL TINTTS ON TEE UPPER STOnIES AND ALLOW BUILDINGS TO BE ALL RESIDTNTIAL USf,S ON LOTS 5 AND 6; AND DIRECTING TRANSMITTAL OF THE AIX)PTEI' AMENDMENTS TO TIIE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT Or ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY; PROVIDING FOR SEVf,RABILITY; PROVIDING FOR AN ETFf,CTII'E DATf,. LOTS 5 AI\I} 6 COMPRISE 2.5I ACR.ES WIIUIN TIIE 47.94+ ACRE SUBDISTR]CT LOCATf,D ON TIIE NOR{E SIDD OF VANDERBIIJI BEACE ROAD ANI) APPROXIMATELY Z MILE WEST OF COLLIER BOULEVARD IN SECTION 34, TOWNSHI? 48 souTH, RAI\GE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. tPL201800033721 & AN ORDINANCE'OT TI{E BOARD OF COUNTT COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COT'NTY, FLORIDA AMINDING ORDINANCE NO. 2OO5-I9, AS AMf,NDED, THE VANDIRBITJT COMMONS PLANNED IJNIT DEVELOPMENT; BY REMOI,ING TIIE R"EQUIREMENT THAT RESIDENThL DWELLING UNITS BE LOCATED IN MDGD.USE BUILDINGS WTIII COMMERCIAL ON TIII FIRST FLOOR AND ALLOWING STANILALONE RESIDENTIAI BUILDINGS; BY RESTAIING A DEVIATION TO REMOYE TEE WALL REQUTREMI]NT ALONG VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD AIYD ATDING A DEMTION TO REDUCE BUILDING FOUNDATION PLANTINGS: BY REYISING TI{E MASTER PLA ; AND PROVIDING AI{ EFTECTIVE DATE, TEE SUBJECT PROPERTY, CONSISTING OF I4.49+A ACRES, TS LOCATED ON TIIE NOKIH SIDE OF VANDERBILT BEACU ROAD AND APPROXIMATf,LY I/4 MILE EAST OF COLLIER BOULEYARD IN SECTION 34, ToWNSEIP 48 SOUTE RANGf, 26 f,AST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. IPL2OI8OOO3366I Project Location o)t P ende rbil ach.RE o o All intdsstod padiss are invited to app€ar and be hoard. Copies of the p.oposed OBDIiIANCE(S) will bs mads available tor ihspoc'tion at the GMD Zoning Division, Comprohensive Planning Section, 2800 N. Hors€shoe Dr., Naples, betwe€n th6 hours ot 8:00 AM. and 5:00 PM., Monday through Friday. Furth€rnore, the matgrials will be made available for insp€ction at the Collier County Clerk's Offico, Fourth Floor, Collior Counly Govemmenl Center, 3299 East TamiamiTrail, suite ,t01 Naples, one week prior to the scheduled hearing. Any questions pertaining to the documonts should be di.ected to the bMD Zoning Division, Comprehenaive Planning Section. Written comm6nts filed with the Clerk to ths Board's Office prior to July 18, mlg, willbe lead and consideled at the public hearing. Any person who decides lo appeal any decision ot th€ Collier Courty Pl.nning Commi.sion will need a r€cord of the proceedings pertaining thereto and thels{orB, may need to ensurs that a vebatim record of the prcceedings is made, which Ecord includss the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. lf yoy are a person with a disability who noeds any acoommodallon in order to participate in this procegding, you arc entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision ot certain assistance. Pleas€ contact the Collier County Facilhies Managern€nl Division, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite '101, Naplos, FL 34112-5356, (239) 252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County CommissioneF Otfice. Malk P Strain, Chairman *CoIi€r County Planning Commisslon 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 290 Attachment: Adoption Affidavit_Advertisement (9725 : Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 - GMPA) 9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 291 Attachment: Adoption Ordinance - 071119(2) (9725 : Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 - GMPA) 9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 292 Attachment: Adoption Ordinance - 071119(2) (9725 : Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 - GMPA) 9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 293 Attachment: Adoption Ordinance - 071119(2) (9725 : Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 - GMPA) 9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 294 Attachment: Adoption Ordinance - 071119(2) (9725 : Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 - GMPA) 9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 295 Attachment: Adoption Ordinance - 071119(2) (9725 : Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 - GMPA) 9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 296 Attachment: Adoption Ordinance - 071119(2) (9725 : Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 - GMPA) 08/15/2019 COLLIER COUNTY Collier County Planning Commission Item Number: 9.A.2 Item Summary: ***This item has been continued from the August 1, 2019 CPCC meeting.*** PL20180003366: An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida amending Ordinance No. 2005-19, as amended, the Vanderbilt Commons Planned Unit Development; by removing the requirement that residential dwelling units be located in mixed-use buildings with commercial on the first floor and allowing stand-alone residential buildings; by restating a deviation to remove the wall requirement along Vanderbilt Beach Road and to add a deviation to reduce foundation plantings; by revising the master plan; and providing an effective date. The subject property, consisting of 14.49+/- acres, is located on the north side of Vanderbilt Beach Road and approximately 1/4 mile east of Collier Boulevard in Section 34, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. (Companion to PL20180003372/CPSS-2019-2) [Coordinator: Nancy Gundlach, AICP, Principal Planner] Meeting Date: 08/15/2019 Prepared by: Title: Planner, Principal – Zoning Name: Nancy Gundlach 08/07/2019 10:31 AM Submitted by: Title: Manager - Planning – Zoning Name: Ray Bellows 08/07/2019 10:31 AM Approved By: Review: Growth Management Operations & Regulatory Management Judy Puig Review item Completed 08/07/2019 11:31 AM Zoning Camden Smith Review Item Completed 08/07/2019 12:15 PM Growth Management Operations & Regulatory Management Donna Guitard Review Item Completed 08/07/2019 3:04 PM Zoning Ray Bellows Review Item Completed 08/08/2019 9:07 AM Growth Management Department James C French Review Item Completed 08/08/2019 9:12 AM Zoning Ray Bellows Review Item Completed 08/08/2019 12:17 PM Planning Commission Mark Strain Meeting Pending 08/15/2019 9:00 AM 9.A.2 Packet Pg. 297 Supplemental Memo August 6, 2019 SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: ZONING DIVISION – ZONING SERVICES SECTION HEARING DATE: AUGUST 15, 2019 SUBJECT: PUDA-PL20180003366, VANDERBILT COMMONS MIXED-USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (MPUD) The Vanderbilt Commons MPUD was continued by the Agent from the August 1, 2019, CCPC hearing to the August 15, 2019, CCPC hearing to revise the PUD Document. The following revisions to the PUD Document were made: 1. Section 3.5 “Table 1 Mixed-Use Development Standards” to reinsert the words “or Other Site Alterations” under “Preserve Area Setback.” 2. Section 3.5 D. Commercial Design Standards: language has been added to clarify that the commercial design standards within LDC Section 5.05.08 Architectural and Site Design Standards are “for buildings that have a commercial component.” 3. Section 3.5 E. Deviation 2 is no longer needed and has been removed. 4. Section 3.5 E. Deviation 3 is no longer needed and has been removed. Attached please find a revised copy of the PUD. END OF MEMORANDUM 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 298 Attachment: MEMO to CCPC 8-6-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: ZONING DIVISION -ZONING SERVICES SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT -PLANNING & REGULATION HEARING DATE: AUGUST 1, 2019 SUBJECT: PUDA-PL20180003366, VANDERBILT COMMONS MIXED-USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (MPUD) PROPERTY OWNER/APPLICANT AND AGENTS: Property Owner/ Applicant: Ralph Cioffi, Manager Vanderbilt Way Apartments, LLC 2950 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 200 Naples, FL 34103 REQUESTED ACTION: Agent: Lindsay F. Robin, MPA Waldrop Engineering, P.A. 28100 Bonita Grande Drive# 305 Bonita Springs, FL 34135 The petitioner requests that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) consider an Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida amending Ordinance No. 2005- 19, as amended, the Vanderbilt Commons Planned Unit Development; by removing the requirement that residential dwelling units be located in mixed-use buildings with commercial on the first floor and allowing stand-alone residential buildings; by restating a deviation to remove the wall requirement along Vanderbilt Beach Road and to add a deviation to reduce foundation plantings; by revising the master plan; and providing an effective date. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject PUD, consisting of 14.49± acres, is located on the north side of Vanderbilt Beach Road, approximately 1/4 mile east of Collier Boulevard in Section 34, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. (See the Location Map on page 2 of this Staff Report.) PUDA-PL20180003366, VANDERBILT COMMONS MPUD July 18, 2019 Page 1 of 13 AGENDA ITEM 9.A.2 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 299 Attachment: Staff Report Van Com - signed 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 300 Attachment: Staff Report Van Com - signed 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 301 Attachment: Staff Report Van Com - signed 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.bPacket Pg. 302Attachment: Staff Report Van Com - signed 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.bPacket Pg. 303Attachment: Staff Report Van Com - signed 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.bPacket Pg. 304Attachment: Staff Report Van Com - signed 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.bPacket Pg. 305Attachment: Staff Report Van Com - signed 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.bPacket Pg. 306Attachment: Staff Report Van Com - signed 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.bPacket Pg. 307Attachment: Staff Report Van Com - signed 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.bPacket Pg. 308Attachment: Staff Report Van Com - signed 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.bPacket Pg. 309Attachment: Staff Report Van Com - signed 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.bPacket Pg. 310Attachment: Staff Report Van Com - signed 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.bPacket Pg. 311Attachment: Staff Report Van Com - signed 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 312 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed Ordinance - 080519 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 313 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed Ordinance - 080519 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 314 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed Ordinance - 080519 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 315 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed Ordinance - 080519 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 316 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed Ordinance - 080519 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 317 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed Ordinance - 080519 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 318 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed Ordinance - 080519 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 319 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed Ordinance - 080519 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 320 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed Ordinance - 080519 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 321 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed Ordinance - 080519 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 322 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed Ordinance - 080519 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 323 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed Ordinance - 080519 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 324 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed Ordinance - 080519 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 325 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed Ordinance - 080519 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 326 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed Ordinance - 080519 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 327 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed Ordinance - 080519 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 328 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed Ordinance - 080519 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 329 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed Ordinance - 080519 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 330 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed Ordinance - 080519 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 331 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed Ordinance - 080519 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 332 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed Ordinance - 080519 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 333 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed Ordinance - 080519 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 334 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed Ordinance - 080519 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 335 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed Ordinance - 080519 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 336 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed Ordinance - 080519 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.cPacket Pg. 337Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed Ordinance - 080519 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons 9.A.2.cPacket Pg. 338Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed Ordinance - 080519 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons 9.A.2.cPacket Pg. 339Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed Ordinance - 080519 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 340 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed Ordinance - 080519 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 341 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed Ordinance - 080519 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.cPacket Pg. 342Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed Ordinance - 080519 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons ORDINANCE NO. 17 - 4 7 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 2005-19, THE CAROLINA VILLAGE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT BY CHANGING THE NAME OF THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT TO VANDERBILT COMMONS PUD; BY ADDING 50,000 SQUARE FEET OF GROSS LEASABLE AREA FOR A TOTAL OF 200,000 SQUARE FEET OF GROSS LEASABLE AREA FOR COMMERCIAL USES; BY DECREASING THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS FROM 64 TO 58 DWELLING UNITS; BY REVISING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND REDUCING THE ACREAGE OF THE PUD FROM 15.88 ACRES TO 14.49 ACRES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY, CONSISTING OF 15.8+/- ACRES, IS LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD AND APPROXIMATELY 1/4 MILE EAST OF COLLIER BOULEVARD IN SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA. IPUDA-PL201500021661 WHEREAS, on April 26, 2005, the Board of County Commissioners approved Ordinance No. 2005-19, which established the Carolina Village Planned Unit Development (PUD); and WHEREAS, Frederick Hood, AICP of Davidson Engineering, Inc. representing Vanderbilt Commons, LLC, petitioned the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, to amend Ordinance 2005-19, the Carolina Village PUD, as amended. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA that: SECTION ONE: Amendments to the PUD Document attached as Exhibit A to Ordinance Number 2005-19, formerly the Carolina Village Planned Unit Development. The PUD Document attached as Exhibit A to Ordinance Number 2005-19, formerly the Carolina Village Planned Unit Development, is hereby amended and replaced with the PUD Document attached hereto as Exhibit A. 16-CPS-01577/1375824/1]243 Page 1 of 2 Vanderbilt Commons/PUDA-PL20150002166 11/3/17 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 343 Attachment: Attachment B-Ordinance 2017-47 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) SECTION TWO: Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State and on the date that the Growth Management Plan Amendment in Ordinance No. 2017- ={'3 becomes effective. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by super-majority vote of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this I , day of C e 1 b; 2017. 1,0 ,'ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK COLLI 'NTY, FLORIDA By: Attest as to Qbapaurtslerk PE Or AYLOR ,irman tj k signature only. Approved as to form and legality: 4 N A H idi Ashto LL1 1 Managing Assistant County Attorney Attachment: Exhibit A—PUD Document (including Revised Master Plan) This ordinance filed with the Secretary of State's Office 1 1§t"day of ,e-nkk;"--- _" and 1Sof thatd+`` filing received this _----ay afD Byr Deputy , 1`" 16-CPS-01577/1375824/1]243 Page 2 of 2 Vanderbilt Commons/PUDA-PL20150002166 11/3/17 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 344 Attachment: Attachment B-Ordinance 2017-47 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) VANDERBILT COMMONS A MIXED USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS AND SUPPORTING MASTER PLAN GOVERNING THE CAROLINA VILLAGE VANDERBILT COMMONS MIXED USE PUD, A MIXED USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PURSUANT TO PROVISIONS OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE. PREPARED FOR: WILLIAM L. HOOVER CATALINA PLAZA, LLC 3785 AIRPORT ROAD N., SUITE 8 1 NAPLES, FLORIDA 34105 VANDERBILT COMMONS, LLC 2950 TAMIAMI TRAIL NORTH NAPLES, FL 34103 GEORGE VUKOBRATOVICH AS SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE OF THE VANDERBILT COMMONS I LAND TRUST DATED 8/1/16 C/O WELSH COMPANIES FL, INC. 2950 TAMIAMI TRAIL NORTH, SUITE 200 NAPLES, FL 34103 MIDGARD SELF-STORAGE NAPLES, LLC 1905 WOODSTOCK RD, BUILDING #900, SUITE #9100 ROSWELL, GA 30075 VANDERBILT COMMONS OWNER'S ASSOCIATION, INC. C/O WELSH COMPANIES FL, INC. 2950 TAMIAMI TRAIL NORTH, SUITE 200 NAPLES, FL 34103 PREPARED BY: RICHARD D. YOVANOVICH GOODLETTE, COLEMAN &JOHNSON, P.A. 1001 N. TAMIAMI TRAIL, SUITE 300 NAPLES, FLORIDA 34103 and Vanderbilt Commons MPUD PUDA-PL20150002166 November 2, 2017 Words added are underlined and words-struck through have been deleted Exhibit A 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 345 Attachment: Attachment B-Ordinance 2017-47 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) NORMAN J. TREBILCOCK, P.E., AICP Q. GRADY MINOR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 3800 VIA DEL REY BONITA SPRINGS, FLORIDA 34134 and 1 1 _ /11111 ? HOOVER PLANNING & DEV., INC. 3785 AIRPORT ROAD N., SUITE B 1 NAPLES, FLORIDA 31105 FREDERICK E. HOOD, AICP DAVIDSON ENGINEERING 4365 RADIO ROAD, SUITE 201 NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 and R. BRUCE ANDERSON CHEFFY PASSIDOMO, P.A. 821 5TH AVENUE SOUTH NAPLES, FLORIDA 34102 DATE FILED August 9, 2004 DATE REVISED April 9, 2005, October 6, 2017 DATE REVIEWED BY CCPC April 7, 2005, October 5, 2017 DATE APPROVED BCC April 26, 2005, December 12, 2017 ORDINANCE NUMBER 2005-19 AMENDMENTS AND REPEAL Vanderbilt Commons MPUD PUDA-PL20150002166 November 2, 2017 Words added are underlined and words struck through have been deleted 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 346 Attachment: Attachment B-Ordinance 2017-47 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE LIST OF EXHIBITS AND TABLES iii STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE 1 SECTION I PROPERTY OWNERSHIP AND DESCRIPTION 3 SECTION II PROJECT DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS 5.6 SECTION III MIXED USE AREA PLAN g9 SECTION IV PRESERVE AREA PLAN 4-417 SECTION V DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS 1518 Vanderbilt Commons MPUD PUDA-PL20150002166 November 2, 2017 Words added are underlined and words struck through have been deleted ii 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 347 Attachment: Attachment B-Ordinance 2017-47 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) LIST OF EXHIBITS AND TABLES EXHIBIT"A" PUD MASTER PLAN/UTILITIES/WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN EXHIBIT"B" CROSS SECTIONS FOR PUD MASTER PLAN EXHIBIT"C" CAROLINA VILLAGE VANDERBILT COMMONS LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT"D" LOCATION MAP EXHIBIT"E" BOUNDARY SURVEY TABLE I DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Vanderbilt Commons MPUD PUDA-PL20150002166 November 2, 2017 Words added are underlined and words struck through have been deleted iii 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 348 Attachment: Attachment B-Ordinance 2017-47 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE The development of approximately 15.88 ±14.49 acres of property in Collier County, as a Mixed Use Planned Unit Development to be known as Carolina Villagc Vanderbilt Commons Mixed Use PUD will be in compliance with the planning goals and objectives of Collier County as set forth in the Collier County Growth Management Plan. The commercial and residential facilities of the Carolina Village Vanderbilt Commons Mixed Use PUD will be consistent with the growth policies, land development regulations, and applicable comprehensive planning objectives for the following reasons: 1. The subject property is within the 14.49-Acre Expansion Area of the Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict land use designation,as identified on the Future Land Use Map-and as described in the Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Boulevard Commercial Sub-District of the Urban -Mixed Use District in the Future Land Use Element. The Future Land Use Element permits commercial and residential land uses in this area and this Mixed-Use PUD complies with both the commercial and residential development standards within the Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict Expansion Area. 2. The subject property's location in relation to existing or proposed community facilities and services permits the development's commercial intensity as described in Objective 2 of the Future Land Use Element. 3. The project development is compatible and complimentary to surrounding land uses as required in Policy 5.4 of the Future Land Use Element. 4. Improvements are planned to be in compliance with applicable sections of the Collier County Land Development Code as set forth in Objective 3 of the Future Land Use Element. 5. The project development will result in an efficient and economical allocation of community facilities and services as required in Policy 3.1.G of the Future Land Use Element. 6. The project development is planned to protect the functioning of natural drainage features and natural groundwater aquifer recharge areas as described in Objective 1.5 of the Drainage Sub-Element of the Public Facilities Element. 7. The project is located within the Urban Mixed Use District 14.49 - Acre Expansion Area of the, Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict, on the Future Land Use Map. The 64 58 proposed units over commercial uses and resultant density of 4.03 dwelling units per acre is in compliance with the Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan based on the following relationships to required criteria: Vanderbilt Commons MPUD PUDA-PL20150002166 November 2, 2017 Words added are underlined and words struck through have been deleted 1 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 349 Attachment: Attachment B-Ordinance 2017-47 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 15.88 Acres for a Mixcd Use Prefect Wit-la residential Uses Over Commercial Uses Within the Vanderbilt Bccach/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict Maximum Permitted Density 16 dwelling units/acre Maximum permitted units, per the Density Rating System of the Collier County Growth Management Plan = 15.88 acres (Expansion Area acreage) 14.49 acres x 16 dwelling units/acre = 251 231 as the maximum number of dwelling units at a maximum density of 46,99 15.94 dwelling units/acre. Requested Maximum Approved dwelling units=64 58. Requested density=4.03 dwelling units/acre. 8. All final local development orders for this project are subject to Division 6.02, Adequate Public Facilities Requirements. of the Collier County Land Development Code. Vanderbilt Commons MPUD PUDA-PL20150002166 November 2, 2017 Words added are underlined and words struck through have been deleted 2 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 350 Attachment: Attachment B-Ordinance 2017-47 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) SECTION PROPERTY OWNERSHIP AND DESCRIPTION 1.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to set forth the location and ownership of the property, and to describe the existing conditions of the property proposed to be developed under the project name of Carolina Village Vanderbilt Commons Mixed Use PUD. 1.2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION The subject property being 15.88±14.49 acres, is located in Section 34,Township 48 South,Range 26 East, and is fully described on Exhibit "C". 1.3 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP The subject property is owned by: The Vanderbilt Beach Road Land Trust, c/o Mark L. Lindner, Trustee, Naples Realty Services, 1980 N.Tamiami Trail, 2nd Floor, Naples, Florida 34103. The subject property is under purchase contract by: William L. Hoover, President of Catalina Land Group, Inc., as the Manager of Catalina Plaza, LLC, 3785 Airport Road North, Suite B 1, Naples, Florida 34105. Vanderbilt Commons, LLC 2950 Tamiami Trail North Naples, FL 34103 George Vukobratovich, as Successor Trustee of the Vanderbilt Commons I Land Trust dated 8/1/16 c/o Welsh Companies FL, Inc. 2950 Tamiami Trail North,Suite 200 Naples, FL 34103 Midgard Self-Storage Naples, LLC 1905 Woodstock Rd, Building#900, Suite#9100 Roswell, GA 30075 Vanderbilt Commons Owner's Association, Inc. c/o Welsh Companies FL, Inc. 2950 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 200 Naples, FL 34103 Vanderbilt Commons MPUD PUDA-PL20150002166 November 2, 2017 Words added are underlined and words struck through have been deleted 3 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 351 Attachment: Attachment B-Ordinance 2017-47 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 1.4 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY AREA A. The subject property is located on the north side of Vanderbilt Beach Road approximately one-quarter mile west of Collier Boulevard (unincorporated Collier County), Florida. B. The zoning classification of the subject property prior to the date of this approved Mixed Use PUD Document was Rural Agricultural. 1.5 PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION The Project site is located within the Harvey Drainage Basin, according to the Collier County Drainage Atlas.The proposed outfall for the Project is to the Vanderbilt Canal. Natural ground elevation varies from 12.3 to 13.2 NGVO; average site elevation is about 12.6 NGVO. The entire site is located within FEMA Flood Zone "X" with no base flood elevation specified. The water management system of the Project will include the construction of a perimeter berm with crest elevation set at or above the 25-year. 3-day peak flood stage. Water quality pretreatment will be accomplished by an on-site lake system prior to discharge south into the Vanderbilt Canal or discharge north into the Black Bear Ridge Subdivision water management system and eventual southerly discharge into the Vanderbilt Canal. The water management system will be permitted by the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) through the Environmental Resource Permit process. All rules and regulations of SFWMD will be imposed upon this Project including, but not limited to:storm attenuation with a peak discharge rate per Collier County and SFWMD Rules, minimum roadway centerline, perimeter berm and finished floor elevations, water quality pre-treatment. and wetland hydrology maintenance. Per the Natural Resource Conservation Service Soils Mapping for Collier County dated January 1990, the soil type found within the limits of the property is #2 - Holopaw Fine Sand. Limestone Substratum. Site vegetation consists predominantly of improved pasture grasses, except a narrow strip of native vegetation along the north property line which is pine cypress-cabbage palm forest. Vanderbilt Commons MPUD PUDA-PL20150002166 November 2,2017 Words added are underlined and words,truck through have been deleted 4 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 352 Attachment: Attachment B-Ordinance 2017-47 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 1.6 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Carolina Village Vanderbilt Commons Mixed Use PUD is a project comprised of 15.88±14.49 acres designated for commercial and residential land uses and the commercial uses are limited to a maximum of 150000 200,000 square feet of gross leasable area and the residential land uses are limited to a maximum of€458 dwelling units. The remainder of the square footage may for retail and office land uses and all residential dwelling units shall be located in mixed-use buildings with commercial uses situated on at least the first floor.Commercial and residential land uses and signage are designed to be harmonious with one another in a natural setting by using common architecture, quality screening/buffering. and native vegetation,whenever feasible. 1.7 SHORT TITLE This Ordinance shall be known and cited as the "Carolina Village Mixed Use Planned Unit Development Ordinance" "Vanderbilt Commons Mixed Use Planned Unit Development Ordinance". Vanderbilt Commons MPUD PUDA-PL20150002166 November 2, 2017 Words added are underlined and words struck through have been deleted 5 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 353 Attachment: Attachment B-Ordinance 2017-47 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) SECTION II PROJECT DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS 2.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to delineate and generally describe the project plan of development, relationships to applicable County ordinances, the respective land uses of the tracts included in the project,as well as other project relationships. 2.2 GENERAL A. Regulations for development of the Carolina Villagc Vanderbilt Commons Mixed Use PUD shall be in accordance with the contents of this document, MPUD - Mixed Use Planned Unit Development District and other applicable sections and parts of the Collier County Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan in effect at the time of building permit application. Where these regulations fail to provide developmental standards, then the provisions of the most similar district in the Land Development Code shall apply. B. Unless otherwise noted, the definitions of all terms shall be the same as the definitions set forth in the Collier County Land Development Code in effect at the time of building permit application. C. All conditions imposed and graphic material presented depicting restrictions for the development of the Carolina Village Vanderbilt Commons Mixed Use PUD shall become part of the regulations,which govern the manner in which the MPUD site may be developed. D. Unless modified,waived or excepted by this MPUD the provisions of other land development codes where applicable remain in full force and effect with respect to the development of the land which comprises this MPUD. E. Development permitted by the approval of this petition will be subject to a concurrency review under the provisions of Division 6.02 Adequate Public Facilities Requirements of the Collier County Land Development Code at the earliest, or next, to occur of either Final Site Development Plan approval, Final Plat approval,or building permit issuance applicable to this development. 2.3 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT DENSITY OR INTENSITY OF LAND USES A. Commercial uses are limited to 15.88 14.49 acres with a maximum of 150,000 200,000 square feet of gross leasable area_ Rfesidential uses are limited to a maximum of 6458 dwelling units and must be located on the second and/or third floors of mixed use buildings with commercial uses on at least the first floor. Carolina Village Vanderbilt Commons Mixed Use PUD is intended to create a pedestrian-friendly atmosphere that encourages area residents to work and shop there and on-site workers to walk to other services, such as having lunch within the project. Vanderbilt Commons MPUD PUDA-PL20150002166 November 2, 2017 Words added are underlined and words,truck through have been deleted 6 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 354 Attachment: Attachment B-Ordinance 2017-47 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) The maximum of 64 58 residential units will not exceed a density of 4.03 units/per acre. The project is shown as 2 tracts, a "North Tract" located north of Carolina Way (the east-west roadway splitting the site) and a "South Tract" located south of Carolina Way. The South Tract is expected to be more retail-oriented with a sit-down restaurant,a bank,and a few residential uses. The North Tract is expected to be more office and service-oriented. The North Tract will likely have both medical and professional offices and some residential uses. 2.4 RELATED PROJECT PLAN APPROVAL REQUIREMENTS A. Prior to the recording of a Record Plat, and/or Condominium Plat for all or part of the MPUD, final plans of all required improvements shall receive approval of the appropriate Collier County governmental agency to insure compliance with the PUD Master Plan, the Collier County Subdivision Code and the platting laws of the State of Florida. B. Exhibit "A", PUD Master Plan, constitutes the required PUD Development Plan. Subsequent to or concurrent with PUD approval, a Preliminary Subdivision Plat if applicable shall be submitted for the entire area covered by the PUD Master Plan. Any division of the property and the development of the land shall be in compliance with the PUD Master Plan, Division 4.03 Subdivision Design and Layout of the Land Development Code, and the platting laws of the State of Florida. C. The provisions of Section 10.02.03, Site Development Plans of the Land Development Code, when applicable, shall apply to the development of all platted tracts, or parcels of land as provided in said Section 10.02.03 prior to the issuance of a building permit or other development order. D. Appropriate instruments will be provided at the time of infrastructural improvements regarding any dedications to Collier County and the methodology for providing perpetual maintenance of common facilities. 2.5 SALES/RENTAL/CONSTRUCTION FACILITIES Temporary sales/rental trailers and construction trailers can be placed on the site after Site Development Plan approval and prior to the recording of Subdivision Plats, subject to the other requirements of Section 5.04.04 of the Land Development Code. 2.6 AMENDMENTS TO PUD DOCUMENT OR PUD MASTER PLAN Amendments may be made to the PUD as provided in the Collier County Land Development Code. Section 10.02.13E. Vanderbilt Commons MPUD PUDA-PL20150002166 November 2, 2017 Words added are underlined and words struck through have been deleted 7 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 355 Attachment: Attachment B-Ordinance 2017-47 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 2.7 PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION FOR COMMON AREA MAINTENANCE Whenever the developer elects to create land area and/or amenities whose ownership and maintenance responsibility is a common interest to all of the subsequent purchasers of property within said development in which the common interest is located, that developer entity shall provide appropriate legal instruments for the establishment of a Property Owners Association whose function shall include provisions for the perpetual care and maintenance of all common facilities and open space. Vanderbilt Commons MPUD PUDA-PL20150002166 November 2,2017 Words added are underlined and words;truck through have been deleted 8 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 356 Attachment: Attachment B-Ordinance 2017-47 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) SECTION III MIXED USE AREA PLAN 3.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to identify specific development standards for the Mixed-Use Areas as shown on Exhibit "A", PUD Master Plan. 3.2 GENERAL DESCRIPTION Areas designated as Mixed Use Areas on the PUD Master Plan are intended to provide a variety of retail uses and office uses,while providing for the opportunity of having residential uses on the second and/or third floor of mixed use buildings,that have commercial uses on at least the first floor.Commercial Areas are limited to a maximum gross leasable area of 150,000 200,000 square feet and residential uses are limited to a maximum of 6458 dwelling units. 3.3 PERMITTED USES No building, structure or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used,or land used, in whole or part. for other than the following: A. Permitted Commercial Principal Uses and Structures: 1. Amusement and Recreation Services (groups SIC 7911, except dance halls and discotheques, 7922, 7991, 7993 only for indoor video game arcade and indoor coin operated amusement machine. 7999 only for bicycle rental, ice skating rink operation, gymnastics instruction, judo instruction, karate instruction and yoga instruction). 2. Apparel and Accessory Stores(groups SIC 5611—5699 except thrift and or surplus stores). parts dealers, limited to retail sales without any installation). 4. Automobile Parking(group 7521). 63. Paint, Glass, and Wallpaper Stores (group SIC 5231). 64. Business Services (groups SIC 7311, 7313,7323, 7331 —7338, 7361, 7371 — 7379, 7384, 7389 only for service of interior decorating/design, mapmaking, notary public, paralegal service, and Postal Service contract stations). 75. Depository and Non-Depository Institutions (groups SIC 6021-6396091). Vanderbilt Commons MPUD PUDA-PL20150002166 November 2, 2017 Words added are underlined and words struck through have been deleted 9 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 357 Attachment: Attachment B-Ordinance 2017-47 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 86. Eating Places (group SIC 5812) and Drinking Places (group SIC 5813 only cocktail lounges and on-premise consumption of beer,wine and liquor, in conjunction with a restaurant.) No freestanding food stands and or kiosks are permitted. Drinking Places are subject to the locational restrictions described in Section 2.6.10 5.05.01 of the Land Development Code. a. Lots 5 & 6 (as shown on the Vanderbilt Commons Subdivision Plat, recorded in Plat Book 60, Page 31 of the Public Records of Collier County) shall have the following limitations: i. No outdoor seating shall be permitted; ii. The hours of operation for any eating place shall be limited to 6 a.m.—4 p.m.; iii. Loading and deliveries shall be from the front entrance only; and iv. The consumption of alcohol is not permitted on these Lots. 97. Educational Services (groups SIC 8211 — 848222, 8243 — 8249, 8299 {r}e—regional li aries). 408. Food Stores with 5,000 square feet or less of gross floor area in the principal structure groups SIC 5411—5499). 449. General Merchandise Stores with 5,000 square feet or less of gross floor area in the principal structure (groups SIC 5311 and 5399 except variety stores: single-price point discount, surplus,overstock or liquidation outlets). 10. Hardware stores with 10,000 square feet or less of gross floor area in the principal structure (SIC 5251). 411. Health Services (groups SIC 8011—8049, 8082). 4-812. Home Furniture, Furnishings and Equipment Stores (groups SIC 5712-5736). 4413. Insurance Carriers, Agents, Brokers, and Services with 5,000 square feet or less of gross floor area in the principal structure (groups SIC 6311—6399, 6411). 4514. Legal Services (group SIC 8111). 4615. Membership Organizations (groups SIC 8611, 8621,8644-8661 only for offices related to religious organizations). 4-716. Miscellaneous Repair(groups SIC 7622, 7629, 7631, 7699 kg only bicycle repair, camera repair, locksmiths, luggage repair, medical/dental instrument repair, musical instrument repair, piano repair, saw/knife sharpening service, and custom picture framing). 4817. Miscellaneous Retail (groups SIC 5912, 5921, 5932 {antiques only-p, 5941 — 5949, 5961, 6964, 5992, 5994—5999 (except auction rooms, awning shops, fireworks, flea markets, gravestones, hot tubs, monuments, pawn shops, sales barns, swimming pools, Vanderbilt Commons MPUD PUDA-PL20150002166 November 2,2017 Words added are underlined and words struck through have been deleted 10 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 358 Attachment: Attachment B-Ordinance 2017-47 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) tombstones and whirlpool baths).{The sale of swimming pool accessories and supplies is allowable under SIC 5999 but not the sale of swimming pools4. 19. Motion Picture Th aters and Video Tape Rental (groups 7832 7811). 29:18. Museums and Art Galleries (gip SIC 8412). 2-119. Personal Services (group SIC 7212 only dry-cleaning and laundry drop off and pickup stations ery, 7221 — 7251, 7291, 7299 (only car title and tag service, diet workshops, tuxedo rental,massage parlor, and tanning salon). 2220. Professional Offices, Research, and Management Consulting Services (groups SIC 8711- 8743, 8748). 2321. Public Administration (groups SIC 9111 9199, 9229, 9311, 9411 9151 and 9431, 9511 9532, 9611—9661,9221). 2422. Real Estate Agents and Managers (groups SIC 6512, 6531—6552). 2623. Security and Commodity Dealers (groups SIC 6211—6289). 2-624. Social Services (gip SIC 8322 only adult day care services, counseling services, and senior citizens associations, 8351). 2-725. Travel Agencies (group SIC 4724). 2826. Any other use which is comparable and compatible in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal and the accessory uses, as prescribed by the LDC, shall be heard by the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA). Prior to the approval of any uses, the applicant shall provide public notice in addition to an advertisement for the hearing which shall include a neighborhood information meeting, mailings and signage in the same manner as that required for substantial amendments to a Planned Unit Development. B. Permitted Residential Principal Uses and Structures: 1. Multi-Family dwellings. 2. Any other use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal and the accessory uses by the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA). C. Accessory Commercial Uses: 1. Uses and structures that are accessory and incidental to the Permitted Uses within this PUD Document. 2. Drinking Places (group 5813 only cocktail lounges and on premise consumption of beer, wine, and liquor in conjunction with a restaurant). Vanderbilt Commons MPUD PUDA-PL20150002166 November 2, 2017 Words added are underlined and words struck through have been deleted 11 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 359 Attachment: Attachment B-Ordinance 2017-47 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 32. Caretaker's residences subject to Section 5.03.05 of the Collier County Land Development Code. D. Accessory Residential Uses: 1. Customary residential accessory uses and structures including carports, garages, and storage buildings. 2. Recreational. uses and facilities including swimming pools, hot tubs, volleyball courts, children's playground areas, tot lots, walking paths, picnic areas, clubhouse, verandahs, and basketball/shuffle board courts. 3. Manager's residences and offices, temporary sales trailers, and model units. 4. Gatehouse. 5. Essential services, including interim and permanent utility and maintenance facilities. 6. Carports are permitted within parking areas. Vanderbilt Commons MPUD PUDA-PL20150002166 November 2, 2017 Words added are underlined and words struck through have been deleted 12 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 360 Attachment: Attachment B-Ordinance 2017-47 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 3.4 PROHIBITED USES 1. Auto stores (SIC 5531, tire dealers, and tire, battery, and accessory dealers— retail, and auto supply stores with service bays, lifts or other facilities for installing such automotive parts). 2. Gasoline service stations, and other facilities with fuel pumps (SIC 5541). 3. Fast food restaurants with drive-through lanes. 4. Any freestanding donation boxes/kiosks. 5. Outdoor amplified sound devices,televisions or live entertainment,with the exception for approved temporary use/event permits as outlined in LDC Section 5.04.01. 6. Adult entertainment and sexually oriented businesses 7. Lots 5&6(as shown on the Vanderbilt Commons Subdivision Plat, recorded in Plat Book 60, Page 31 of the Public Records of Collier County)shall not provide main public access entryways along the northern facades of any proposed building. 3.45 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS A. Table I sets forth the development standards for land uses within the Carolina Village Vanderbilt Commons Mixed Use PUD. Front yard setbacks in Table I shall be measured as follows: 1. If the parcel is served by a public or private right-of-way, the setback is measured from the adjacent right-of-way line. 2. If the parcel is served by a non-platted private drive,the setback is measured from the back of curb or edge of pavement. If the parcel is served by a platted private drive,the setback is measured from the road easement or property line. Vanderbilt Commons MPUD PUDA-PL20150002166 November 2,2017 Words added are underlined and words struck through have been deleted 13 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 361 Attachment: Attachment B-Ordinance 2017-47 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) TABLE I MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS The table below sets forth the development standards for land uses within the Vanderbilt Commons MPUD. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or subdivision plat. COMMERCIAL USES RESIDENTIAL USES Minimum Lot Area 10,000 Sq Ft. square feet SCU on First Floor10,000 square feet Minimum Lot Width 751 feet(1) SCU on First Floor 75 feet(1) Front Yard Setback 201 feet SCU on First Floor 20 feet Side Yard Setback(2) 1-Story 61 feet SCU on First Floor 6 feet 2-Story 7.5-feet SCU on First Floor 7.5 feet 3-Story 10-feet SCU on First Floor 10 feet Rear Yard Setback Principal Structure 151 feet SCU on First Floor 15 feet Accessory Structure 101feet 101feet PUD Boundary Setback Principal Structure BH BH Accessory Structure 101 feet or buffer width 101 feet or buffer width Lake Setback(3) 201 feet or 0'feet 201 feet or 0'feet Preserve Area Setback Principal Structure 251feet 251feet Accessory Structures or 10 feet Other Site Alterations 10'feet Distance Between Structures Main/Principal 1-Story to 1-Story 121 feet 4i 13.5 feet 1-Story to 2-Story 13.51 feet 13.5' 15 feet 2-Story to 2-Story 151 feet 455'-17.5 feet 2-Story to 3-Story 17.51 feet 17.5' 20 feet 3-Story to 3-Story 201 feet 201 12 feet Accessory Structures Same as principal structure Same as principal structure Maximum Height(4) Retail Building 35 feet and 1-story N/A Office Building 42 feet and 3-stories N/A Accessory Building 35 feet 35'feet Mixed-Use Building(4) 451 feet and 3-stories 45-feet and 3-stories 700 square feet of principal 580700 square feet per dwelling unit Minimum Floor Area structure on first habitable floor Vanderbilt Commons MPUD PUDA-PL20150002166 November 2, 2017 Words added are underlined and words struck through have been deleted 14 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 362 Attachment: Attachment B-Ordinance 2017-47 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 1) May be reduced on cul-de-sac lots and lots along the inside and outside of curved streets by 25%. 2)Where fee simple lots are created for each building unit no side yard shall be required between interior units of a unified principal structure. and the side yard shall be measured from the exterior wall(s)of the unified principal structure. 3) Lake setbacks are measured from the control elevation established for the lake. Lake setbacks can be reduced from 20'to 0'where a stemwall bulkhead or pier is constructed and the requirements of Section 4.02 05 of the LDC are met. 4) Retail uses are limited to the first floor of any building residential uses are limited to the second and third floors of mixed-use buildings (structures with retail or office uses on the first floor and office or residential uses on the second and third floors) Note 'BH" refers to building height_and "SCU" refers to same as thc commercial use on thc first floor of the mixed use building the residential use is located in. B. Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements: As required by Division 4.05 Off-Street Parking and Loading of the Land Development Code in effect at the time of building permit application. Off-site parking is permitted where a shared parking facility is located within 300 feet of the building requiring such parking. C.Buffering Requirements: 1. A minimum twenty(20)foot wide Type "D" Buffer shall be provided along Vanderbilt Beach Road, with the landscaping as required in Section 4.06.02 of the Collier County Land Development Code. D. Commercial Design Standards The project shall meet the commercial design standards within Division 5.05.08 of the Collier County Land Development Code. Vanderbilt Commons MPUD PUDA-PL20150002166 November 2, 2017 Words added are underlined and words struck through have been deleted 15 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 363 Attachment: Attachment B-Ordinance 2017-47 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) E.Deviations 1. Deviation from Land Development Code(LDC)Section 5.06.04.G 5.06.01A.6.a. c.,in order to to allow one double-faced off-premises sign with a maximum of 8 feet in height and 32 64 square feet in area, located in the road right-of-way e . •. -- Carolina Village (labeled Pristine Drive on Exhibit "A") and on the west side of the Carolina Village advertising.The sign will be limited exclusively to no more than 3 residential developments within the abutting Wolf Creek PUD. The proposed sign must meet all vehicular safety sight distance standards for Collier County and have a minimum 10-foot setback from the Vanderbilt Beach Road right-of-way, as described in Section 5.06.04A.6.a. of the LDC. The proposed sign must be externally illuminated only. lighted and not internally lighted. This having the sign looking out of balance if it were located solely on the western half of the median in the road, and also minimizes confusion for visitors and deliveries to the 3 residential projects. Once Pristine Drive is accepted by the Board of County Commissioners as a public road, any structural changes to the sign shall require a right-of-way permit. The signage shall be perpetually maintained by the homeowner's associations of the developments named on the sign. The County at any time after the road becomes public may require the sign to be relocated for road expansion or to address capacity or safety issues. Vanderbilt Commons MPUD P U DA-PL20150002166 November 2, 2017 Words added are underlined and words struck through have been deleted 16 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 364 Attachment: Attachment B-Ordinance 2017-47 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) SECTION IV PRESERVE AREA PLAN 4.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to identify specific development standards for the Preserve Areas as shown on Exhibit "A," PUD Master Plan, as may be amended pursuant to Section 5.3. 4.2 PERMITIED USES No building, structure or part thereof,shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or part,for other than the following: A. Permitted Principal Uses and Structures: 1. Passive recreational areas. 2. Biking, hiking, and nature trails, and boardwalks. 3. Water management structures. 3. Native preserves and wildlife sanctuaries. Vanderbilt Commons MPUD PUDA-PL20150002166 November 2,2017 Words added are underlined and words struck through have been deleted 17 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 365 Attachment: Attachment B-Ordinance 2017-47 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) SECTION V DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS 5.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to set forth the commitments for the development of this project. 5.2 GENERAL A. All facilities shall be constructed in strict accordance with Final Site Development Plans, Final Subdivision Plans and all applicable State and local laws, codes, and regulations applicable to this MPUD, in effect at the time of building permit application. B. Except where specifically noted or stated otherwise, the standards and specifications of the Collier County Land Development Code shall apply to this project even if the land within the MPUD is not to be platted. The developer, his successor and assigns, shall be responsible for the commitments outlined in this document. C. The developer, his successor or assignee,shall follow the PUD Master Plan and the regulations of this MPUD as adopted and any other conditions or modifications as may be agreed to in the rezoning of the property. In addition, any successor in title or assignee is subject to the commitments within this Agreement. 5.3 PUD MASTER PLAN A. Exhibit "A", PUD Master Plan illustrates the proposed development and is conceptual in nature. Proposed tract, lot or land use boundaries or special land use boundaries shall not be construed to be final and may be varied at any subsequent approval phase such as Final Platting or Site Development Plan approval. Subject to the provisions of Section 10.02.13E. of the Collier County Land Development Code, amendments may be made from time to time. B. All necessary easements, dedications, or other instruments shall be granted to insure the continued operation and maintenance of all service utilities and all common areas in the project. Vanderbilt Commons MPUD PUDA-PL20150002166 November 2, 2017 Words added are underlined and words struck through have been deleted 18 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 366 Attachment: Attachment B-Ordinance 2017-47 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 5.4 SCHEDULE OF DEVELOPMENT/MONITORING REPORT submittal.The project is expected to be completed in one(1)or two (2) phases. The landowners shall proceed and be governed according to the time limits pursuant to Section 10.02.13D. of the Land Development Code. The third anniversary date of this MPUD traffictraffic lanes arc open to traffic) of the 6 laning projects on both Collier Boulevard, between Boulevard and Collier Boulevard. One entity (hereinafter the Managing Entity) shall be responsible for PUD monitoring until close-out of the PUD, and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUD commitments until close-out of the PUD. At the time of this PUD approval, the Managing Entity is The Vanderbilt Commons Owner's Association, Inc. Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity,then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document that needs to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. After such approval,the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity.As Owner and Developer sell off tracts,the Managing Entity shall provide written notice to County that includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required by the PUD by the new owner and the new owner's agreement to comply with the Commitments through the Managing Entity, but the Managing Entity shall not be relieved of its responsibility under this Section. When the PUD is closed-out, then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment of PUD commitments. l3. Monitoring Report: An annual monitoring report shall be submitted pursuant to Section 10.02.13F. of the Collier County Land Development Code. 5.5 ENGINEERING A. This project shall be required to meet all County Ordinances in effect at the time final construction documents are submitted for development approval. B. Design and construction of all improvements shall be subject to compliance with appropriate provisions of the Collier County Land Development Code, Division 4.03 Subdivision Design and Layout. Vanderbilt Commons MPUD PUDA-PL20150002166 November 2, 2017 Words added are underlined and words struck througn have been deleted 19 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 367 Attachment: Attachment B-Ordinance 2017-47 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 5.6 WATER MANAGEMENT A. A copy of the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) Surface Water Permit Application shall be sent to Collier County Development Services with the SDP submittal. B. A copy of the SFWMD Surface Water Permit, SFWMD Right-of-Way Permit, and SFWMD Discharge Permit shall be submitted prior to Final Site Development Plan Approval. C. An Excavation Permit will be required for any proposed lake(s) in accordance with Collier County and SFWMD rules. D. Lake setbacks from the perimeter of the MPUD may be reduced to twenty-five(25)feet where a six (6)foot high fence or suitable substantial barrier is erected. 5.7 UTILITIES A: Water distribution, sewage collection and transmission and interim water and/or sewage treatment facilities to serve the project are to be designed, constructed, conveyed, owned and maintained in accordance with Collier County Ordinance No. 88-76, as amended, and other applicable County rules and regulations. 5.8 TRAFFIC A. All traffic control devices.signs, pavement markings and design criteria shall be in accordance with Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Manual of Uniform Minimum Standards MUMS),current edition,FDOT Design Standards,current edition,and the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), current edition. All other improvements shall be consistent with and as required by the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC). B. Arterial level street lighting must be provided at all development access points.Access lighting must be in place prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. C. Access points. including both driveways and proposed streets, shown on the PUD Master Plan arc considered to be conceptual. Nothing depicted on any such PUD Master Plan shall vest any right of access at any specific point along any property frontage. All such access issues shall be approved or denied during the review of required subsequent site plan or final plat submissions.All such accesses shall be consistent with the Collier County Access Management Long Range Transportation Plan. The number of access points constructed may be less than the number depicted on the PUD Master Plan; however, no additional access points shall bo considered unless a PUD Amendment is processed. D. Site related improvements (as opposed to system related improvements) necessary for safe ingress and egress to this project, as determined by Collier County, shall not be eligible for impact fee credits. All required improvements shall be in place and available to the public prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. Vanderbilt Commons MPUD PUDA-PL20150002166 November 2, 2017 Words added are underlined and words struck through have been deleted 20 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 368 Attachment: Attachment B-Ordinance 2017-47 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) e :•-.- - ' ar ended- F. All work within Collier County rights of way shall require a Right of Way Permit. G. All proposed median openings shall be in accordance with the Collier County Access Resolution 01 247), as amended, and the LDC. as it may be amended- Collier County reserves the right to modify or close any median openings existing at the.time of approval of this MPUD which is found to be adverse to the health, safety and welfare of the public.Any such modifications shall be based on,but arc not limited to.safety,operational circulation,and roadway capacity. 4-4. Nothing in any development order shall vest a right of access in excess of a right in/right out condition at any access point. Neither will the existence of a point of ingress.a point of egress or a median opening, nor the lack thereof. shall be the basis for any future cause of action for damages against Collier County by the developer. its successor in title,or assignee. 4. All internal roads, driveways, alleys, pathways, sidewalks, and interconnections to adjacent developments, with possible exceptions for Buckstone Drive and Pristine Drive, shall be operated and maintained by an entity created by the developer and Collier County shall have no responsibility for maintenance of any such facilities. J. If any required turn lane improvement requires the use of existing County right of way or asement, compensating right of way, shall be provided without cost to Collier County as a consequence of such improvement. K. If in the sole opinion of Collier County, a traffic signal, or other traffic control device, sign or pavement marking improvement within a public right of way or casement is determined to be necessary, the cost of such improvement shall be borne by the developer and by County before the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. A. 1 Adjacent developments have been designed to provide shared access or interconnections with this development. The PUD Master Plan indicates these locations. The developer, or assigns, shall assure that any such shared access or interconnection is utilized and shall accommodate the perpetual use of such access by incorporating appropriate language into the development covenants or plat. M. The developer shall provide a copy of a shared road agreement for both Pristine Drive and payments on each prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. N. The project may commence construction of infrastructure, site work, and buildings upon receiving all applicable permits,however Certificates of Occupancy for any buildings shall not lanes arc open to traffic) of the 6 laning projects of both Collier Boulevard, between Vanderbilt Commons MPUD PUDA-PL20150002166 November 2, 2017 Words added are underlined and words struck through have been deleted 21 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 369 Attachment: Attachment B-Ordinance 2017-47 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) B. A west bound right turn lane on Vanderbilt Beach Road, at the intersection of Pristine Drive and Vanderbilt Beach Road, shall be constructed by the Owner(s) prior to the certificates of occupancy for any building within Lot 3, as shown on the Vanderbilt Commons Subdivision Plat, recorded in Plat Book 60, Page 31 of the Public Records of Collier County. C. An east bound left turn lane on Vanderbilt Beach Road, at the intersection of Pristine Drive and Vanderbilt Beach Road, shall be constructed by the Owner(s) at the earliest of either the granting of the certificates of occupancy for any building within Lots 5 and or 6 (as shown on the Vanderbilt Commons Subdivision Plat, recorded in Plat Book 60, Page 31 of the Public Records of Collier County) or within five years of the adoption of this PUD amendment. D. The maximum trip generation allowed by the proposed uses(both primary and ancillary) may not exceed 547 PM Peak Hour,two-way trips (total external with pass-by trips subtracted). E. Access to all parcels within the Vanderbilt Commons Subdivision Plat, recorded in Plat Book 60, Page 31 of the Public Records of Collier County, or as amended, shall be from Vanderbilt Way. F. No public access or circulation drives shall be provided to, from or within lots 4, 5 and 6 (as shown on the Vanderbilt Commons Subdivision Plat, recorded in Plat Book 60, Page 31 of the Public Records of Collier County) between the northernmost property boundary lines(shared boundary with Black Bear Ridge of the Wolf Creek PUD) and the northernmost structures governed by their PUD setbacks) of the identified lots. G. Nothing in this PUD shall have any effect upon the obligations under any private agreements. 5.9 PLANNING Pursuant to Section. 2.03.07E. of the Land Development Code, if during the course of site clearing, excavation or other construction activity a historic or archaeological artifact is found, all development within the minimum area necessary to protect the discovery shall be immediately stopped and the Collier County Code Enforcement Department contacted. 5.10 ENVIRONMENTAL A. Environmental permitting shall be in accordance with the State of Florida Environmental Resource Permit Rules and be subject to review and approval by Environmental Services Staff. B. All conservation/preservation areas shall be designated as Preserve on all construction plans, and shall be recorded on the plat as a separate tract or easement with protective covenants per or similar to Section 704.06 of the Florida Statutes. Preserve areas shall be dedicated on the plat to the project's homeowners association or like entity for ownership and maintenance responsibilities and to Collier County with no responsibility for maintenance. Buffers shall be provided in accordance with Section 3.05.07 of the Collier County Land Development Code. Vanderbilt Commons MPUD PUDA-PL20150002166 November 2,2017 Words added are underlined and words struck through have been deleted 22 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 370 Attachment: Attachment B-Ordinance 2017-47 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) In the event the project does not require platting,all conservation areas shall be recorded as conservation/preservation tracts or easements dedicated to Collier County with no responsibility for maintenance and subject to the uses and limitations similar to or as per Section 704.06 of the Florida Statutes. C. An exotic vegetation removal, monitoring, and maintenance (exotic-free) plan for the site, with emphasis on the conservation/preservation areas, shall be submitted to Current Planning Environmental Staff for review and approval prior to Final Site Development Plan/Construction Plan approval. D. Any perimeter berms, shall be entirely outside of all upland and wetland preserve areas. E. A minimum of 0.17 acres of native vegetation shall be preserved on-site, including all 3 strata. and emphasizing the largest contiguous area possible. If created preserves will be used to make up any of the acreage, the landscape plans shall re-create the native plant community in accordance with Section 3.05.07 of the Collier County Land Development Code) shall be submitted with the First Development Order submittal for review and approval. F. All Category I invasive exotic plants, as defined by the Florida Exotic Pest Plant Council, shall be removed from within preserve areas and subsequent annual removal of these plants (in perpetuity) shall be the responsibility of the property owner. G. A Preserve Area Management Plan shall be provided to Environmental Staff for approval prior to site/construction plan approval identifying methods to address treatment of invasive exotic species,fire management,and maintenance. H. This MPUD shall be consistent with the Environmental Section of the GMP Conservation and Coastal Management Element and the Land Development Code at the time of final development order approval. I. This MPUD shall comply with the guidelines of the USFWS and FFWCC for impacts to protected species. A Habitat Management Plan for those species shall be submitted to environmental review staff for review and approval prior to Site Plan approval. J. All approved Agency (SFWMD, ACOE, FFWCC) permits shall be submitted prior to final Site Plan/Construction Plan approval. 5.11 ACCESSORY STRUCTURES Accessory structures shall be constructed simultaneously with or following the construction of the principal structure except for a temporary construction site office or temporary sales/rental facility. Vanderbilt Commons MPUD PUDA-PL20150002166 November 2, 2017 Words added are underlined and words struck through have been deleted 23 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 371 Attachment: Attachment B-Ordinance 2017-47 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 5.12 SIGNS Signs for this mixed-use project shall be permitted as described in Section 5.06 of the Collier County Land Development Code. 5.13 LANDSCAPING FOR OFF-STREET PARKING AREAS All landscaping for off-street parking areas shall be in accordance with Chapter 4 of the Collier County Land Development Code in effect at the time of building permit application. 5.14 POLLING PLACES Pursuant to Section 4.07.06 of the Land Development Code provision shall be made for the future use of building space within common areas for the purposes of accommodating the function of an electoral polling place. An agreement recorded in the official records of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, which shall be binding upon any and all successors in interest that acquire ownership of such common areas including, but not limited to: condominium associations, homeowners' associations, or tenants' associations. This agreement shall provide for said community recreation/public building/public room or similar common facility to be used for a polling place if determined to be necessary by the Supervisor of Elections. 5.15 LIGHTING Lighting provided at the rear of any building and structure adjacent to the Black Bear Ridge Subdivision,for development on lots 5 and 6, (as shown on the Vanderbilt Commons Subdivision Plat, recorded in Plat Book 60, Page 31 of the Public Records of Collier County)shall be in the form of shielded structure mounted sconces. These shielded structures shall be placed no higher than 10-feet measured from finished floor of the building or structure. The areas identified shall be free of"pole lighting". 5.16 ADDITIONAL SCREENING Owner(s) shall construct a 6-foot wall at the rear of lots 5 and 6; abutting the Black Bear Ridge Subdivision (as shown on the Vanderbilt Commons Subdivision Plat, recorded in Plat Book 60, Page 31 of the Public Records of Collier County).No wall will be located along Tract C,the Preserve Area. Vanderbilt Commons MPUD PUDA-PL20150002166 November 2, 2017 Words added are underlined and words struck through have been deleted 24 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 372 Attachment: Attachment B-Ordinance 2017-47 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 3 I RPUDOf-I °II D-I A D N C RPUDWOLFCREEK WOLF CREEKRI {[ ° N m m O IRERESIDENTIAL)RESIDENTIAL)P A N m AO3NC) Am• COy m D Z0CZ > m D PRISTINE DRIVE-RIGHT-OF-WAYDz731MIzN20'TYPE D LANDSCAPE BUFFERNm• 0 n 03 D 0 i, f .,` '" I I q0•TYPED LANDSCAPE BUFFERmOOIrEArF 101yIm264— 1p I I Inco 2N. Fr I+ N. Er >0 2 Z z F I m zi. <O o OA r I 1, A°ycOmmwym, D l I n 1- oI202n0nCOr1O40Im1mIItrDmA N A° C)m> <C)2>ooc(RDD A l 3 Ii N 04-) m 0 a z 0 N O Z A m -0 I - I :O 0gym CR—CD°`O< C I I m CC-I _ZONCOmmWAo o 10000Dc0yI-mOplm C 1 c i I z0 - ZnNzrZgMoOW 3 1I 4G"-,-J =*g'w1mp3yF D q ` I _ D m1 yN° mmOn .Z7 1 ISvcC)2- CNp6CAiZO I DEI--m c0D1>>AD-4 m I y-1 AZ ZCr Orme COI-ym. mmo-r3Ncvz ID-.{ • -- I MP*I ComomcmNp3 I 01 AO m g z V z p g D y O m N D ` I 1 Iii NDm {AZr-,m mIn Mc 0 m I _.y I Pm> OZNN°Oy3 Am 30 ' n i r o Z A A-o m m ma-1-*m1-c r 1 m - I , DA 33 Fmommz-i mayoD°1 A n mmm ZZy›,T,KF Z Dy 03 Q1 D 1 m 01F 03 oCmmxZOOOD i 003 i 50 I ` 3mC3cACPZ=DA ° mT C) I O W m m°O mu)A x m O O H o I 1 rn D mmol Z m O m D m 3 z-I p I * _.. 1 m O NACr NC=Nn I/ > i m y D O z n o A Z 3 0 W I• m __. I mm Z030Kx0l0ry O 1 D°° °{ o m N O r m Z A 1 m ON 0Np( l<-ziDo(nO m IF, zmDlDZomO 7 , 1 `m O m r 2 r o o 0 m 1 0 I o I v C 18-'I m I C0 CD 1mAm O ACCCC)mxmC1 mOO m m mmDOD< rc,Dcc OmmD,CC< < 1 : 1.._,T, 1 pZ 1 Z r O- i r Z m 3,a 1 1 m a _, I, - I m z r oToz5O 11 1°cmznlp O 0, 1 . AN a 1co y O r z m D p O 0 p m CR D Z Z r I - D N 1 mAr•OOm °1gC0{ D- mn CA 1` m JI- m=mZhA mylnA_<Z ZDmA Di I m m m{ D 0 O Z O m-4 r p r°O n xzA1rm r A 1 D y c°m 0 F 0 0 a w 1i rn 71 1 DE211°D OOZI. Rm- I O- 725Dr- a-r MI 1I 1O O a02 r--OWZDZOp mDN7,A1 FDA IiTl Omo CCl I I 9 01 O 71 4F,-1 m< m m y m N° mom z CR° m I I'0 mmimpm z)T0 CVODNvm=y< A t. 1 : m 2 a,A RI p0 N10> r Cf 000 m RI m G)2pm 1 M 1A 0 IDxD 1 A m Z In A{ O O O v o I m D r1r AA-. 1z OAZm W zoomzaZ m V 1 1 A Ir- 0,,, AD(nMrODFM0°Sz mm Ii I E- m 811M>08 800 CCO-U p21 CO-- I I- 1 0 2.- I m o z D A O m° D m m 1 A A A A p p 2 D n m •S I I jI m mDNm pnlxmDin=00m , O AO 1 I D vrVD.,---- Aolnw9I1cm1, m m •I 0> mm10 OyOA mt) Nmmzzmm Z°> g, I• .CD mNz DN N<D{° ,mz>co m . .• I mZmD• m2A0 D C r>e, 3 n I I I I A°-- mi7m• mxNO p5K2cm{ cmmoo I IIir- C1 D CR rn 1,Zj, -Oz>CN 2<NOrm-1 I'I I I ----- I 'a0 C)mmmZo gzrcymmlmmmp I__.—.{..__._.. 1 2 A Zi m D'o z{N m C o v a m 0 1 z 20'TYPE D LANDSCAPE BUFFER I..! .._. 0 C°'RI 1= D m y m r v 0 z 1 r'&50F.z o 20'TYPED LANDSCAPE BUFFER D Z 2 U3 m 0 3 A 0 1 m-D 0omyN-' m C o m 2 o v0i c r RI z m 8 BUCKSTONE DRIVE______-RIGHT-OF-WAY pmmz5 wm NmZcczi<041mr°-xi0 NDRI°n C S1rN1NTISm A0 o mK pyp y N N m{O m z p c m m zp y owr N OkDAm I) co 31A1ZNr 1 y 31y N ACI'n np Zz22D CENTI( ryN m OC CR 50 ilk Z m301A -, yrrnCR >XfJ 2 A1i0 z;Zo m 00{my 0 _CRo1Drn=WCO F 71 mmW D 1 D m m o z m m x,Z 1 m rrn TO y RONECi: CLIENT-- DFs ry /- REVISIONS— VANDERBILT COMMONS, ED er: 1 APIMII VANDERBILT COMMONS MPUD LLC Dw,wNDr: - - - cr I CIO WELSH COMPAINES FEH O FLORIDA,INC. T Q OHECKED Bv tSHEET TITLE I2NW NINTH STREET NORTH, r,6~6 a w S0E20, SUITE 101 pRp-0CT NO.: Caplet Porde W 34 6 CONCEPTUAL MASTER PLAN NCTLEs,il;alo3<a3s q x y^ Carp,can a. t.,woN..J\, J 9.A.2.dPacket Pg. 373Attachment: Attachment B-Ordinance 2017-47 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) His1 i0f4, 2 ,..e liriisr— py „AO .! 8 vmg Oi;i 14 mF. 41 ll I Q, — z g ZZ a N 1 1 oQ„ 2 V8 a 42 XY a igi lig PI 1 ; 1 iti ani p rj s 4 ! 2 n ; p Yi8 4E 4 PZ 1-Mr 5 111 11E1 I N a(..:, 3 s g ;' cs I nIit1' g m I = 8 cn = I C q33 . . 19 aeIP70nD11C I is s $ >- So z 3a A ii; 7 Z I 4; 5 , '4 z k-;r y A. zea A_.F R9 2aF r X W a X1 gi c e gm4 i4 3 1 9.A.2.dPacket Pg. 374Attachment: Attachment B-Ordinance 2017-47 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) Exhibit "G" Carolina Village Legal Description THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; LESS AND EXCEPT VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBEDASFOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE RUN NORTH 89°46'10" WEST. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 34, FOR A DISTANCE OF 1,322.24 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THESOUTHWEST1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 34; THENCE RUN NORTH02°14'20"WEST, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST1/4 OF SAID SECTION 34, FOR A DISTANCE OF 145.13 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHRIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD. A 175 FOOT WIDE RIGHT-OF-WAY,AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL OF LAND HEREIN DESCRIBED; THENCECONTINUENORTH02°14'20"WEST, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OFTHESOUTHEAST1/4 OF SAID SECTION 34. FOR A DISTANCE OF 523.93 FEET TO THENORTHEASTCORNEROFTHESOUTH1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST1/4 OF SAID SECTION 34; THENCE RUN NORTH 89°47'36" WEST, ALONG THE NORTH LINEOFTHESOUTH1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION34, FOR A DISTANCE OF 1,322.04 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTH1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 34; THENCE RUNSOUTH02°13'26" EAST, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THESOUTHEAST1/4 OF SAID SECTION 34, FOR A DISTANCE OF 523.38 FEET TO A POINT ONTHENORTHRIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD: THENCE RUNSOUTH89°46'10" EAST, ALONG THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID VANDERBILTBEACHROAD, FOR A DISTANCE OF 1,322.20 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING;CONTAINING 15.879 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 375 Attachment: Attachment B-Ordinance 2017-47 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) EXHIBIT "D " LOCATION MAP N W - -- E s PROPOSED NA GEL — CRA I G RESIDEN TIA L PUD 0 oc NOL F CREEK Loop Rd. RESID. PUD WOLF CREEKMISSION ai RESID. PUD oSubjec t Site HILLS 7/////////// //, 7 SHOPPING/// /////// CENTER VA NDERBIL T BEACH RD. 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 376 Attachment: Attachment B-Ordinance 2017-47 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) i .EXHIBIT .7g" — SURVEY.l4-,'i::2:,.,::s1..•:...,.I.'I?,,:,...'.:.,-...,.1:i;4.,.:'e,,:.:I'',:I..1..•J4.7:"I"s.t„':cn'r.r.I:,I.I.4..T2I. Ii,;." I,.Ail'1Ic....,.i,i.i.;`A4l.,41• 1t,,•:.:':,:If1.,..: t:..,:.I'.-i•.'.;.1-iI4•.t:e.L:l!;:i:.2I,I1...,I::p;I.:..!,:''.;...:,.•`,'.:•.......,.:, .•:...qik.44-,.r`g..•...)g,1I.1..,,.;%.-..,:..,.:..e5i,-,.-,!$4;,:'; I1l, VIrwr/ 4gi.riili;.. x','.,2.,•1'g..,:,,:, •: itt1-.' 1••:"Z* flt. ii11l1Vdick!t!-t..t.•!.r:1:!p,iV,,.k::: IPi:.,' . t r l01111444100lt c.7,5;:,5'-:..•$g..'-..-.l..P.o..•:t§s:i, tt*;,:'. eN4:..—I111illIgialtIqlsts:l'it1 It.:; z 0 2 .i• 1 $4:ti X z0011 1zf • g. i )t tii9iiii6g,h a gli il 1 k -g it 11*!I!*11ixiik 119 t tRME ; 01 1 ht !lt !Ilitlitii*I! !!'iAl! EA - ;tNot p -3 -Itselidtii!. . lsisi bei 1;; „.4' ; i li : i ml t f *,.: . ,. -•.- 1 ....1i14IZ!i44:01,11610,14 lit ' 11 " : ii =s1 11 ;,11.1 t& t 1—;11 ;111i4illitrVi:1!116: i, I it. . t la a 4.9 0 ,.., 0 .•,;Tt .14:0 s tqw 111 al f. hli: g o I!...t :.., v , t ,t 4,i4s;,-..1,till le" "il; ligavga i t,. g t* 1 41ti11. Z1Ctlt,4 II. CANAL O.W. A.- - M. ..itgotWARDCR.95/ 11 tie' I a 1 t g ••••"'N1ZA4 X ik g.t... . it [... igt 1 -,,. H fa 6.1 rr- Etri - I z. .-1 IE 0 6; 1.! k '''z..! ''-1 i- ..' •'!.kr $ ''' •'- AI arven-w 32503' 1 i4FIII.-,21t- 77_jIt';4".•tt'= 7. 4 I I C I 44. II I t140, I I: I7, ttt I4.1 i` ft I 4VI . i - 1%,. 4 . ' i . t `45' .4 • g.=.i 1 1 t t 1 1il il. I s -1 I - •4 'C..1' ' ' "576 I I - I • . - IV-r-4,1=4:•;:......... 1--"-'1) 1 4A itii 1 i 1 It111I14 •1 t§1 I . aft/I/WV 4,\ 4440, 4I. --- e I9.A.2.dPacket Pg. 377Attachment: Attachment B-Ordinance 2017-47 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 0, 01 sit, K L. e 7a at. y FLORIDA DEPARTMENT Of STATE RICK SCOTT KEN DETZNER Governor Secretary of State December 15, 2017 Honorable Dwight E. Brock Clerk of the Circuit Court Collier County Post Office Box 413044 Naples, Florida 34101-3044 Attention: Martha Vergara Dear Mr. Brock: Pursuant to the provisions of Section 125.66, Florida Statutes, this will acknowledge receipt of your electronic copy of Collier County Ordinance No. 17-47, which was filed in this office on December 15, 2017. Sincerely, Ernest L. Reddick Program Administrator ELR/lb R. A. Gray Building • 500 South Bronough Street • Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0250 Telephone: (850) 245-6270 www.dos.state.fl.us 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 378 Attachment: Attachment B-Ordinance 2017-47 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) RICK SCOTT Governor KEN DETZNER Secretary of State R. A. Gray Building 500 South Bronough Street Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0250 Telephone: (850) 245-6270 www.dos.state.fl.us August 8, 2018 Ms. Crystal K. Kinzel, Interim Clerk Collier County Post Office Box 413044 Naples, Florida 34101-3044 Attention: Martha Vergara Dear Ms. Kinzel: Pursuant to the provisions of Section 125.66, Florida Statutes, this will acknowledge receipt of your corrected electronic copy of Collier County Ordinance No. 17-47, which was filed in this office on August 8, 2018. Sincerely, Ernest L. Reddick Program Administrator ELR/lb 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 379 Attachment: Attachment B-Ordinance 2017-47 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) Vanderbilt Commons MPUD Cover Letter – Request Narrative Page 1 of 2 March 4, 2019 Ms. Nancy Gundlach, AICP, RLA Zoning & Land Development Review Department Community Development & Environmental Services 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 RE: Vanderbilt Commons MPUD PUD Amendment (PUDA-PL20180003366) Dear Ms. Gundlach: The purpose of this PUD Amendment application is to remove the requirement to provide commercial uses on the first floor of the mixed-use buildings on Lots 5 and 6, thereby allowing residential-only buildings in the Vanderbilt Commons Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD). The Vanderbilt Commons MPUD currently allows up to 200,000 square feet of commercial uses and up to 58 dwelling units pursuant to Ordinance 17-47. The amendments requested in this petition are specific to Lots 5 & 6 and no changes made affect any other portion of the MPUD. As currently approved, Lots 5 & 6 can be developed with up to 58 dwelling units with commercial uses required to be provided on the first floor. This request attempts to create a more compatible and complimentary development pattern adjacent to the Wolf Creek RPUD directly north by eliminating more intensive non-residential uses from the tract in proximity to single-family residential. An expansive 300-foot plus preserve is situated between the amendment area and the closest residential units in Wolf Creek, further reducing the impact of development. In addition to the elimination of first-floor commercial, the Applicant is seeking one (1) deviation for reduced width of the required building perimeter plantings, also specific to Lots 5 & 6. Please refer to the enclosed Deviation and Justification narrative for more details. A companion small-scale GMP Amendment (PL20180003372) to the Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Blvd. Commercial Subdistrict has been submitted to remove the text requiring first floor commercial with upper story residential. Per the Pre-Application Meeting Notes, the following items are enclosed for your review: 1. One (1) Check in the amount of $7,625; 2. One (1) copy of the Cover Letter; 3. One (1) copy of the Deviation and Justification Narrative; 4. One (1) copy of the PUDA application; 5. One (1) copy of the Pre-Application Meeting Notes; 6. One (1) copy of the Affidavit of Authorization; 7. One (1) copy of the Property Ownership Disclosure Form; 8. One (1) copy of the Covenant of Unified Control; 9. One (1) copy of the Completed Addressing Checklist; 10. One (1) copy of the Warranty Deed; 11. One (1) copy of the List Identifying Owner; 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 380 Attachment: Attachment C-Cover Letter Request Narrative - Prepared (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) Vanderbilt Commons MPUD Cover Letter-Request Narrative Page 2 of 2 12. One (1) copy of the Boundary Survey Waiver E-mail; 13. One (1) copy of the Letter of No Impact prepared by Trebilcock Consulting; 14. One (1) copy of the Revised Master Plan (24”x36” and 8 1/2” x 11”); 15. One (1) copy of the Original Zoning Ordinance 17-46; 16. One (1) copy of the revised PUD document in strike-through/underline format; 17. One (1) copy of the Project Aerial; 18. One (1) copy of the Current Zoning Map; 19. One (1) copy of the Existing Land Use Map; and 20. One (1) copy of the Future Land Use Map. Should you require additional information or have any questions, please feel free to contact me directly at (239) 405-7777, extension 2232, or lindsay.robin@waldropengineering.com. Sincerely, WALDROP ENGINEERING, P.A. Lindsay F. Robin, MPA Project Planner Enclosures cc: Ralph Cioffi, Vanderbilt Way Apartments, LLC Jeff Wright, Henderson, Franklin, Starnes & Holt, P.A. Norman J. Trebilcock, Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, LLC Nathalie White, Studio+ 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 381 Attachment: Attachment C-Cover Letter Request Narrative - Prepared (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) ‒ 1 ‒ Growth Management Department Zoning Division C O N S I S T E N C Y R E V I E W M E M O R A N D U M To: Nancy Gundlach, AICP, Principal Planner Zoning Services Section From: Corby Schmidt, AICP, Principal Planner Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division Date: April 8, 2019 Subject: Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Consistency Review of Proposed Planned Unit Development Amendment PETITION NUMBER: PL20180003366 [REV 1] PETITION NAME: Vanderbilt Commons Mixed Use Planned Unit Development Amendment (PUDA) REQUEST: The areas of the petition relevant to Comprehensive Planning request the Vanderbilt Commons Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD), PUD document, be amended to revise the Statement of Compliance, the Project Description, the Description of Project Density or Intensity of Land Uses, the General Description, and the Mixed Use Development Standards, allowing the already-approved residential dwelling units to be located on all floors of multi-story residential-use only buildings on Lots 5 and 6; with another revision removing a description of future mixed uses. LOCATION: The ±2.51-acre subject property comprising the two lots is located at the northwest corner of Buckthorn Drive and Vanderbilt Way, and which is generally 300 feet north of Vanderbilt Beach Road, approximately one-quarter mile west of Collier Boulevard (CR 951), in Section 34, Township 48 South, Range 26 East. COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING COMMENTS: The subject property is designated Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict, as identified on the Future Land Use Map in the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the Growth Management Plan. The commercial subdistrict promotes mixed-use development and is described in the FLUE as follows: “To encourage mixed use projects, this Subdistrict also permits residential development when located in a mixed-use building (residential uses over commercial uses). Such residential development is allowed at a maximum density of sixteen (16) dwelling units per acre; the gross acreage of the project is used in calculating residential density. Retail uses shall be limited to single-story. …Also, mixed-use buildings, containing residential uses over commercial uses, shall be limited to three (3) stories.” Residential is an allowable use in the Subdistrict. The companion Small-Scale GMP amendment will change Subdistrict provisions to allow single-use residential only buildings. The changes 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 382 Attachment: Attachment D-FLUE Consistency Review (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) ‒ 2 ‒ proposed herein will also allow the residential units to be contained in single-use buildings, while maintaining a mixed use project overall. Relevant FLUE objectives and policies are stated below, followed by staff remarks. FLUE Policy 5.6 requires new development to be compatible with, and complementary to, surrounding land uses, as set forth in the Land Development Code. Comprehensive Planning staff leaves this determination to the Zoning Services staff as part of their review of the petition in its entirety. However, the compatibility analysis is encouraged to be comprehensive and include a review of both the subject property and surrounding or nearby properties regarding allowed use intensities and densities, development standards (building heights, setbacks, landscape buffers, etc.), building mass, building location and orientation, architectural features, amount and type of open space and location, traffic generation/attraction, etc. The County recognizes Smart Growth policies and practices in its consideration of future land use arrangements and choice-making options. FLUE Objective 7 and Policies 7.1 through 7.4 promote Smart Growth policies for new development and redevelopment projects pertaining to access, interconnections, open space, and walkable communities. Given the nature of this petition and the minor changes proposed (no changes in permitted uses, densities, or intensities), staff is of the opinion that a re-evaluation of FLUE policies under Objective 7 (pertaining to access, interconnections, walkability, etc.) is not necessary. These policies were recently evaluated during staff’s consistency review of the Vanderbilt Commons Mixed Use Planned Unit Development Amendment (PUDA) petition, approved December 12, 2017. CONCLUSION: Based upon the above analysis, this proposed PUDA may not be deemed consistent with the FLUE. However, the petition may be deemed consistent if the companion Small-Scale GMP amendment petition (PL20180003372/CPSS-2019-2) is adopted and goes into effect. The PUD Ordinance needs to provide for the effective date to be linked to the effective date of the companion Small- Scale GMP amendment petition. Stipulations: 1. This petition may only be deemed consistent with the FLUE if the companion Small-Scale GMP amendment petition (PL20180003372/CPSS-2019-2) is adopted and goes into effect. 2. The PUDA Ordinance needs to provide for the effective date to be linked to the effective date of the companion Small-Scale GMP amendment petition. cc: Ray Bellows, Zoning Manager, Zoning Services Section David Weeks, AICP, Growth Management Manager, Comprehensive Planning Section Michael Bosi, AICP, Director, Zoning Division G: Comp\Consistency Reviews\2019 G:\CDES Planning Services\Consistency Reviews\2019\PUDA\PUDA-PL2018-3366 VB Commons R1_drft.docx 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 383 Attachment: Attachment D-FLUE Consistency Review (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 1 of 5 Memorandum To: Nancy Gundlach, PLA, AICP From: Lindsay Robin cc: Ralph Cioffi, Vanderbilt Way Apartments, LLC Date: June 14, 2019 Subject: Vanderbilt Commons PUD & GMPA (PL20180003366 & PL20180003372) Neighborhood Information Meeting Synopsis Waldrop Engineering, P.A., and Collier County Staff conducted a Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) on Monday, June 3, 2019. The meeting was held at 5:30 p.m. at the Greater Naples Fire Rescue Headquarters at 14575 Collier Blvd., Naples, Florida 34119. The sign-in sheets are attached as Exhibit “A” and demonstrates 20 residents were in attendance. Handouts were distributed providing the project overview and development regulations. The handouts are attached as Exhibit “B”. Lindsay Robin (Agent) conducted the meeting with introductions of the consultant team and Staff, and an overview of the proposed MPUD amendment application, including the location of the 2.51-acre subject area and the request to remove the requirement to provide commercial uses on the first floor. She also outlined the PUD amendment and Growth Management Plan amendment process and opportunities to provide input at public hearings. Ralph Cioffi, the Applicant, also spoke about the project and provided input on details relating to the development of the site with 58 multi-family dwelling units. Following the Consultant’s presentation, the meeting was opened up to attendees to make comments and ask the consultant team questions regarding the proposed development. The following is a summarized list of the questions asked and responses given. The following comments were asked by attendees. The Applicant’s representatives’ responses are shown in bold. 9.A.2.g Packet Pg. 384 Attachment: Attachment E-NIM Synopsis (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 2 of 5 Question/Comment 1: Do you have a current drawing of the building and the site plan with the updates?  Response: Elevations of the building are currently worked on and can be provided at a follow-up meeting with the HOA. Question/Comment 2: The main concern is what you are going to do with the lower level, and how it will look.  Response: The first floor will be residential instead of commercial, so the architectural relief, including the entry way and doors will have higher standards, and the proposed landscaping will comply with County’s landscaping standards. We understand your concern. Question/Comment 3: Are you open to changing the plans? What exactly are you intending to do with these two buildings and how many apartment units will they have?  Response: It will be only one building, three (3) stories, with 58 apartments, 2 and 3-bedroom units. Question/Comment 4: Will you have enough parking for the proposed uses? Do you comply with the height limit?  Response: We have the sufficient parking spaces. We also comply with the PUD height limit. Question/Comment 5: There are some issues with the demand for this apartment housing product and the aesthetics of the built environment around it.  Response: We have done supply and demand studies and there is more than enough demand for apartment housing in this area. Question/Comment 6: Would you have any plans to show how the apartments will be structured? The density seems to be quite high for the subject area.  Response: The 2-bedroom units will have an 800-square foot floor plan, and the 3-bedroom units will have a 1,200-square foot floor plan and above. Question/Comment 7: Will you have parking spaces and parking garages? Where will vehicles enter and exit to park their cars?  Response: We have sufficient parking spaces, and the proposed development will have garages for the ground floor units. The garages are located behind the frontage. 9.A.2.g Packet Pg. 385 Attachment: Attachment E-NIM Synopsis (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 3 of 5 Question/Comment 8: So, there could be potentially more noise coming from the apartments?  Response: There are buffers in place to lessen the impact of noise. There is also the 6-foot masonry wall that is required, buffer plantings that will be in place and the significant preserve area in place directly north of the property. Question/Comment 9: What amenities are you offering to the potential residents of this apartment building? Will they be able to do outdoor activities right in front of their first-floor apartment?  Response: Currently the site plan does not provide any amenities. There will be POA restrictions that all future residents will have to conform to. There will be also be buffers in place, as mentioned previously, between the subject area and the abutting neighbors, including the Black Bear Ridge community. Due to the buffers that will be in place and the expansive preserve are as well as the 6-foot wall, visibility of the site from Black Bear Ridge will be very limited. Question/Comment 10: If you do parking garages, what will happen to the amount of parking spaces needed?  Response: Sufficient parking will be provided. Because no commercial uses are intended in the proposed development, parking requirements associated to those commercial uses will not be required. Question/Comment 11: There is an overall sense in the Black Bear Ridge community that the plans of this development have changed significantly and abruptly since the last time we were announced of this development. We would like for this development to be successful, but we do not believe we have been considered.  Response: We understand, and we would like to be present on any future HOA meetings Black Bear Ridge will host to show you site plans, floor plans and additional information about the proposed development. Question/Comment 12: What type of clientele are you looking to attract for this development? Or at what price point are you looking?  Response: The housing demand for the area is pretty strong, and there is a lot of old housing product in the market. There are some full-amenity housing products being developed on Immokalee Road, but the market is generally positive for housing products of newer standards at average price points. 9.A.2.g Packet Pg. 386 Attachment: Attachment E-NIM Synopsis (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 4 of 5 Question/Comment 13: There is significant traffic in the area. It is advisable for you to take that into consideration.  Response: We have noted your comment, and believe the County is in process of studying that area. Question/Comment 14: There is significant concerns about having children and infants playing on the first floor.  Response: We cannot restrict residents to be adults only. We have noted your concern. Question/Comment 15: Will there be a play area for children?  Response: At this point, there is no playground area planned for children inside the proposed development. That is something we can consider moving forward designing the site. Question/Comment 16: Are all the apartment units for rent only? What will be the minimum rental period?  Response: All apartment units are for rent. There are two companies that will be managing the property, the front of the house rental management company that collects rent, verifies rental checks, etc. The asset management will be ourselves and we perform management of the building and parcels, including maintenance and landscaping. The minimum rental period will be 12 months. Question/Comment 17: There was a hope within the residential communities for commercial uses in the subject area.  Response: There are commercial uses surrounding the subject area, with multiple tenants, neighborhood stores, etc. Question/Comment 18: Community residents believe that residential uses on first floors of any building will lead to a “spill-over” effect and will negatively impact the aesthetics and quality of life of current residents, such as putting out their lawn chairs, or dog chairs outside the residential premise and into the sidewalks. Additionally, when the PUD was first proposed, it was going to be mixed use development.  Response: We understand the communities concern and would be happy to be on any HOA or community meeting to share additional information regarding the proposed development. 9.A.2.g Packet Pg. 387 Attachment: Attachment E-NIM Synopsis (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 5 of 5 Question/Comment 19: Will you have balconies on the apartment units?  Response: There will be no balconies on the apartment units. There were no further questions or comments. Ms. Robin thanked the attendees for coming and noted that their contact information is available for those who wished to reach out with any further questions. The meeting concluded at approximately 6:30 p.m. The meeting was recorded per the CD attached as Exhibit “C”. 9.A.2.g Packet Pg. 388 Attachment: Attachment E-NIM Synopsis (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.gPacket Pg. 389Attachment: Attachment E-NIM Synopsis (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.gPacket Pg. 390Attachment: Attachment E-NIM Synopsis (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 PUD - PL20180003366 & PL20180003372 Neighborhood Information Meeting Monday, June 3, 2019 5:30 p.m. PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET Project Size: 2.51+/- Acres Future Land Use: Urban Mixed Use District, Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Blvd. Commercial Subdistrict Current Zoning: Planned Unit Development (PUD) Proposed Zoning: Planned Unit Development (PUD) Approved Density/Uses: 58 dwelling units Proposed Density/Uses: 58 dwelling units Project Requests: (PL20180003372) - Small-scale amendment to the Future Land Use Element, Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict, to remove the requirement to provide first-floor commercial uses with residential on the upper stories. (PL20180003366) PUD Amendment to remove the PUD requirement for commercial uses on the first floor of the mixed use buildings. 9.A.2.g Packet Pg. 391 Attachment: Attachment E-NIM Synopsis (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 PUD DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS COMMERCIAL USES RESIDENTIAL USES Minimum Lot Area 10,000 square feet 10,000 square feet Minimum Lot Width 75 feet (1) 75 feet (1) Front Yard Setback 20 feet 20 feet Side Yard Setback (2) 1-Story 6 feet 6 feet 2-Story 7.5 feet 7.5 feet 3-Story 10 feet 10 feet Rear Yard Setback Principal Structure 15 feet 15 feet Accessory Structure 10 feet 10 feet PUD Boundary Setback Principal Structure BH BH Accessory Structure 10 feet or buffer width 10 feet or buffer width Lake Setback (3) 20 feet or 0' feet 20 feet or 0’ feet Preserve Area Setback Principal Structure 25 feet 25 feet Accessory Structures or Other Site Alterations 10 feet 10 feet Distance Between Structures Main/Principal 1-Story to 1-Story 12 feet 13.5 feet 1-Story to 2-Story 13.5 feet 15 feet 2-Story to 2-Story 15 feet 17.5 feet 2-Story to 3-Story 17.5 feet 20 feet 3-Story to 3-Story 20 feet 12 feet Accessory Structures Same as principal structure Same as principal structure Maximum Height (4) Retail Building 35 feet and 1-story N/A Office Building 42 feet and 3-stories N/A Accessory Building 35 feet 35 feet Residential & Mixed-Use Building (4) 45 feet and 3-stories 45 feet and 3-stories Minimum Floor Area 700 square feet of principal structure on first habitable floor 700 square feet per dwelling unit (1) May be reduced on cul -de-sac lots and lots along the inside and outside of curved streets by 25%. (2) Where fee simple lots are created for each building unit no side yard shall be required between interior units of a unified principal structure. and the side yard shall be measured from the exterior wall(s) of the unified principal structure. 9.A.2.g Packet Pg. 392 Attachment: Attachment E-NIM Synopsis (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) (3) Lake setbacks are measured from the control elevation established for the lake. Lake setbacks can be reduced from 20' to 0' where a stem wall bulkhead or pier is constructed and the requirements of Section 4.02.05 of the LDC are met. (4) Retail uses are limited to the first floor of any building residential uses are limited to the second and third floors of mixed-use buildings (structures with ret ai l or office uses on the first floor and office or residential uses on the second and third floors) Note ‘BH’ refers to building height. 9.A.2.g Packet Pg. 393 Attachment: Attachment E-NIM Synopsis (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 & 6 PUD PERMITTED USES A. Permitted Commercial Principal Uses and Structures: 1. Amusement and Recreation Services SIC 7911, except dance halls and discotheques, 7922, 7991. 7999 only for bicycle rental, gymnastics instruction, judo instruction, karate instruction and yoga instruction). 2. Apparel and Accessory Stores (SIC 5611- 5699 except thrift and or surplus stores). 3. Paint, Glass, and Wallpaper Stores (SIC 5231). 4. Business Services (SIC 7311, 7313, 7323, 7331 – 7338, 7361, 7371 — 7379, 7384, 7389 only for service of interior decorating/design, mapmaking, notary public, paralegal service, and Postal Service contract stations). 5. Depository and Non-Depository Institutions (SIC 6021 - 6091). 6. Eating Place (SIC 5812) and Drinking Places (SIC 5813 only cocktail lounges and on-premise consumption of beer, wine and liquor, in conjunction with a restaurant.) No freestanding food stands and or kiosks are permitted. Drinking Places are subject to the locational restrictions described in Section 5.05.01 of the Land Development Code. a. Lots 5 & 6 (as shown on the Vanderbilt Commons Subdivision Plat, recorded in Plat Book 60, Page 31 of the Public Records of Collier County) shall have the following limitations: i. No outdoor seating shall be permitted; ii. The hours of operation for any eating place shall be limited to 6 a.m. - 4 p.m.; iii. Loading and deliveries shall be from the front entrance only; and iv. The consumption of alcohol is not permitted on these Lots. 7. Educational Services (SIC 8211 – 8222, 8243 - 8249, 8299). 8. Food Stores with 5,000 square feet or less of gross floor area in the principal structure (SIC 5411- 5499). 9. General Merchandise Stores with 5,000 square feet or less of gross floor area in the principal structure (SIC 5311 and 5399 except variety stores: single-price point discount, surplus, overstock or liquidation outlets). 10. Hardware stores with 10,000 square feet or less of gross floor area in the principal structure (SIC 5251). 11. Health Services (SIC 8011 - 8049, 8082). 12. Home Furniture, Furnishings and Equipment Stores (SIC 5712 - 5736). 13. Insurance Carriers, Agents, Brokers, and Services with 5,000 square feet or less of gross floor area in the principal structure (SIC 6311- 6399, 6411). 14 . Legal Services (SIC 8111). 15. Membership Organizations (SIC 8611, 8621, 8661 only for offices related to religious organizations). 16. Miscellaneous Repair (SIC 7622, 7629, 7631, 7699 only bicycle repair, camera repair , locksmiths, luggage repair , medical/dental instrument repair, musical instrument repair, piano repair, saw/knife sharpening service, and custom picture framing). 9.A.2.g Packet Pg. 394 Attachment: Attachment E-NIM Synopsis (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 17. Miscellaneous Retail (SIC 5912, 5921, 5932 antiques only, 5941 - 5949, 5961,5992, 5994 - 5999 (except auction rooms, awning shops, fireworks, flea markets, gravestones, hot tubs, monuments, pawn shops, sales barns, swimming pools, tombstones and whirlpool baths). The sale of swimming pool accessories and supplies is allowable under SIC 5999 but not the sale of swimming pools. 18. Museums and Art Galleries (SIC 8 412). 19. Personal Services ( SIC 7212 only dry-cleaning and laundry drop off and pickup stations, 7221 - 7251, 7291, 7299 (only car title and tag service, diet workshops, tuxedo rental, and tanning salon). 20. Professional Offices, Research, and Management Consulting Services (SIC 8711 - 8743, 8748 ). 21. Public Administration (SIC 9111 - 91 99, 9229, 9311, 9411 and 9431, 9511 - 9532, 9611- 9661, 9221). 22. Real Estate Agents and Managers (SIC 6512, 6531- 6552). 23. Security and Commodity Dealers (SIC 6211 - 6289). 24. Social Services (SIC 8322 only adult day care services, counseling services, and senior citizens associations , 8351). 25. Travel Agencies (SIC 4724). 26. Any other use which is comparable and compatible in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal and the accessory uses, as prescribed by the LDC, shall be heard by the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA). Prior to the approval of any uses, the applicant shall provide public notice in addition to an advertisement for the hearing which shall include a neighborhood information meeting, mailings and signage in the same manner as that required for substantial amendments to a Planned Unit Development. Permitted Residential Principal Uses and Structures : 1. Multi-Family dwellings. 2. Any other use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal and the accessory uses by the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) . Accessory Commercial Uses: 1. Uses and structures that are accessory and incidental to the Permitted Uses within this PUD Document. 2. Caretaker's residences subject to Section 5.03.05 of the Collier County Land Development Code. Accessory Residential 1. Customary residential accessory uses and structures including carports, garages, and storage buildings. 2. Recreational. uses and facilities including swimming pools, hot tubs, volleyball courts, children's playground areas, tot lots, walking paths, picnic areas, clubhouse, verandahs, and basketball/shuffle board courts. 3. Manager's residences and offices, temporary sales trailers, and model unit s. 4. Gatehouse. 5. Essential services, including interim and permanent utility and maintenance facilities. 6. Carports are permitted within parking areas. 9.A.2.g Packet Pg. 395 Attachment: Attachment E-NIM Synopsis (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) PROHIBITED USES 1. Auto stores (SIC 5531, tire dealers, and tire, battery, and accessory dealers - retail, and auto supply stores with service bays, lifts or other facilities for installing such automotive parts). 2. Gasoline service stations, and other facilities with fuel pumps (SIC 5541). 3. Fast food restaurants with drive-through lanes. 4. Any freestanding donation boxes/kiosks. 5. Outdoor amplified sound devices, televisions or live entertainment, with the exception for approved temporary use/event permits as outlined in LDC Section 5.04.01. 6. Adult entertainment and sexually oriented businesses 7. Lots 5 & 6 (as shown on the Vanderbilt Commons Subdivision Plat, recorded in Plat Book 60, Page 31 of the Public Records of Collier County) shall not provide main public access entryways along the northern facades of any proposed building. 9.A.2.g Packet Pg. 396 Attachment: Attachment E-NIM Synopsis (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) Dear Commissioners, Donna.Fiala@colliercountyfl.gov Bu rt.sa unders@collierco u ntyfl .gov Penny.Taylor@colliercountyfl.gov KarenHorniak@colliergov.net Markstrain@colliergov.net pdearborn@johnrwood.com Karl.fry@colliercountyfl.gov.net StanChrzanowki @colliergov.net JosephSchmitt@ coll iergov .net Cc RayBellows@coll iercountyfl.gov BosiMichael@colliergov.ne t Vanderbilt Commons PUD Change -PUDA-PL20180003366 GMPA-PL20180003372 Opposition •--I live in Black Bear Ridge {directly behind this property) and adamantly oppose the change to remove the existing PUD requirement "residential dwelling units shall be located in a mixed-use building with commercial uses situated on at the first floor". Residential must be over commercial space. This has been in the document prior to this developer purchasing the parcel. We purchased our homes aware development would take place in Vanderbilt Commons but with certain requirements meant to keep a consistent appearance to the plaza. Allowing residential on the first floor removes the consistent appearance to the entire property and allows everyday living to spill onto the development which will have a negative impact to the area in terms of property value and quality of life. The requirement of commercial on the first floor and residential on the upper floors maintains the consistency of the development and promotes the intent of the development. The only benefit of allowing this to happen is for the developer. We are not opposing residential development that is compatible to the surrounding communities. Please send a message to developers .... " Residents Matter" Developer privilege needs to end. Please stop incompatibly issues with residents of our PUD and Naples Respectfully Name Address 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 397 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 398 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 399 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 400 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 401 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 402 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 403 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 404 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 405 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 406 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 407 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 408 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 409 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 410 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 411 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 412 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 413 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 414 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 415 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 416 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 417 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 418 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 419 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 420 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 421 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 422 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 423 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 424 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 425 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 426 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 427 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 428 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 429 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 430 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 431 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 432 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 433 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 434 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 435 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 436 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 437 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 438 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 439 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 440 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 441 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 442 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 443 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 444 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 445 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 446 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 447 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 448 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 449 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 450 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 451 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 452 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 453 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 454 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 455 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 456 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 457 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 458 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 459 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 460 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 461 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 462 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 463 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 464 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 465 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 466 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 467 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 468 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 469 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 470 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 471 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 472 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 473 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 474 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 475 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 476 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 477 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 478 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 479 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 480 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 481 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 482 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.hPacket Pg. 483Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.hPacket Pg. 484Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.hPacket Pg. 485Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 486 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 487 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 488 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 489 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 490 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 491 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 492 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 493 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 494 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 495 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 496 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 497 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 498 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 499 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 500 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 501 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 502 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 503 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 504 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 505 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 506 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 507 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 508 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 509 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 510 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 511 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 512 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 513 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 514 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 515 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 516 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 517 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 518 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 519 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 520 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 521 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 522 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 523 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 524 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 525 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 526 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 527 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 528 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 529 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 530 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 531 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 532 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 533 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 534 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 535 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 536 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 537 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 538 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 539 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 540 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 541 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 542 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 543 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 544 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 545 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 546 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 547 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 548 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 549 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 550 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 551 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 552 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 553 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 554 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 555 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 556 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 557 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 558 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 559 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 560 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 561 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 562 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 563 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 564 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 565 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 566 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 567 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 568 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 569 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 570 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 571 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 572 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 573 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 574 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 575 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 576 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 577 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 578 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 579 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 580 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 581 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 582 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 583 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 584 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 585 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 586 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 587 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 588 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 589 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 590 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 591 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 592 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 593 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 594 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 595 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 596 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 597 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 598 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 599 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 600 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 601 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 602 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 603 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 604 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 605 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 606 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 607 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 608 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 609 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 610 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 611 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 612 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 613 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 614 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 615 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 616 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 617 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 618 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 619 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 620 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 621 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 622 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 623 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 624 Attachment: Attachment F-Petition and Letters of Objection.pdf 7-18-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) VANDERBILT WAY COMMONS LOTS 5 & 6 PUDA CCPC PACKAGE PL20180003366 APPLICATION 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 625 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 February 1, 2019 Page 1 of 11 Application for a Public Hearing for PUD Rezone, Amendment to PUD or PUD to PUD Rezone PETITION NO PROJECT NAME DATE PROCESSED PUD Rezone (PUDZ): LDC subsection 10.02.13 A.-F., Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code Amendment to PUD (PUDA): LDC subsection 10.02.13 E. and Ch. 3 G. 2 of the Administrative Code PUD to PUD Rezone (PUDR): LDC subsection 10.02.13 A.-F. APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Name of Property Owner(s): _________________________________________________________ Name of Applicant if different than owner: _____________________________________________ Address: _________________________City: _______________ State: _________ ZIP: ___________ Telephone: _______________________ Cell: ______________________ Fax: __________________ E-Mail Address: ____________________________________________________________________ Name of Agent: ____________________________________________________________________ Firm: _____________________________________________________________________________ Address: ____________________________City: _______________ State: _______ ZIP: __________ Telephone: ____________________ Cell: ____________________ Fax: _______________________ E-Mail Address: ____________________________________________________________________ Be aware that Collier County has lobbyist regulations. Guide yourself accordingly and ensure that you are in compliance with these regulations. To be completed by staff 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 626 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 February 1, 2019 Page 2 of 11 REZONE REQUEST This application is requesting a rezone from: _________________________ Zoning district(s) to the ________________________________ zoning district(s). Present Use of the Property: _________________________________________________________ Proposed Use (or range of uses) of the property: _________________________________________ Original PUD Name: ________________________________________________________________ Ordinance No.: ____________________________________________________________________ PROPERTY INFORMATION On a separate sheet attached to the application, provide a detailed legal description of the property covered by the application: • If the request involves changes to more than one zoning district, the applicant shall include a separate legal description for property involved in each district; • The applicant shall submit 4 copies of a recent survey (completed within the last six months, maximum 1" to 400' scale), if required to do so at the pre-application meeting; and • The applicant is responsible for supplying the correct legal description. If questions arise concerning the legal description, an engineer's certification or sealed survey may be required. Section/Township/Range: / / Lot: Block: Subdivision: ___________________________________________________ Metes & Bounds Description: _________________________________________________________ Plat Book: Page #: Property I.D. Number: ____________________________________ Size of Property: _______ ft. x _______ ft. = ________ Total Sq. Ft. Acres: _________ Address/ General Location of Subject Property: __________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ PUD District (refer to LDC subsection 2.03.06 C): Commercial Residential Community Facilities Industrial Mixed Use Other: ________________ 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 627 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 February 1, 2019 Page 3 of 11 ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE Zoning Land Use N S E W If the owner of the subject property owns contiguous property please provide a detailed legal description of the entire contiguous property on a separate sheet attached to the application. Section/Township/Range: / / Lot: Block: Subdivision: ___________________________________________________ Plat Book: Page #: Property I.D. Number: ____________________________________ Metes & Bounds Description: _________________________________________________________ ASSOCIATIONS Required: List all registered Home Owner Association(s) that could be affected by this petition. Provide additional sheets if necessary. Information can be found on the Board of County Commissioner’s website at http://www.colliergov.net/Index.aspx?page=774. Name of Homeowner Association: _________________________________________________ Mailing Address: ____________________________ City: _________ State: ______ ZIP: ______ Name of Homeowner Association: _________________________________________________ Mailing Address: ____________________________ City: _________ State: ______ ZIP: ______ Name of Homeowner Association: _________________________________________________ Mailing Address: ____________________________ City: _________ State: ______ ZIP: ______ Name of Homeowner Association: _________________________________________________ Mailing Address: ____________________________ City: _________ State: ______ ZIP: ______ Name of Homeowner Association: _________________________________________________ Mailing Address: ____________________________ City: _________ State: ______ ZIP: ______ 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 628 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 February 1, 2019 Page 4 of 11 EVALUATION CRITERIA Pursuant to LDC subsections 10.02.13 B, 10.02.08 F and Chapter 3 G. of the Administrative Code, staff’s analysis and recommendation to the Planning Commission, and the Planning Commission’s recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners shall be based upon consideration of the applicable criteria. On a separate sheet attached to the application, provide a narrative statement describing the rezone request with specific reference to the criteria below. Include any backup materials and documentation in support of the request. a. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. b. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the county attorney. c. Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives and policies of the Growth Management Plan. (This is to include identifying what Sub-district, policy or other provision allows the requested uses/density, and fully explaining/addressing all criteria or conditions of that Sub-district, policy or other provision.) d. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. e. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. f. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. g. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. h. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications of justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. Deed Restrictions: The County is legally precluded from enforcing deed restrictions; however, many communities have adopted such restrictions. You may wish to contact the civic or property owners association in the area for which this use is being requested in order to asce rtain whether or not the request is affected by existing deed restrictions. 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 629 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) Vanderbilt Commons MPUD PL20180003366 Evaluation Criteria Page 1 of 3 VANDERBILT COMMONS MPUD EVALUATION CRITERIA PUD REZONE CONSIDERATIONS (LDC SECTION 10.02.13.B) a. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. The Vanderbilt Commons MPUD is approved for 200,000 square feet of commercial uses and up to 58 residential dwelling units. The proposed amendment seeks to amend the requirement to provide commercial uses on the first floor of mixed-use buildings on Lots 5 and 6. The amendment does not request additional density or intensity from what is currently approved. Based upon the nature of surrounding uses, the established development pattern in the general area of the property, and the existing levels of public infrastrcture to service the MPUD, the Property is suitable for development of 58 multi-family dwelling units in residential-only buildings as proposed through this application. Moreover, the project will ensure the existing land area within the County’s Urban-designated lands are not underutilized from a public infrastructure standpoint, thereby upholding sound planning principles b. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not toe be provided or maintained at public expense. Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the County Attorney. The subject property is under Unified Control by Vanderbilt Way Apartments, LLC, who has authorized Waldrop Engineering, P.A., and Henderson, Franklin, Starnes & Holt, P.A. to file this application. Please also refer to the enclosed Covenant of Unified Control. c. Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives and policies of the growth management plan. (This is to include identifying what subdistrict, policy or other provision allows the requested uses/density, and fully explaining/addressing all criteria or conditions of that subdistrict, policy or other provision.) The MPUD will remain consistent with the Growth Management Plan (GMP) as follows: FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT Policy 5.2: All applications and petitions for proposed development shall be consistent with this Growth Management Plan, as determined by the Board of County Commissioners. FUTURE LAND USE Policy 5.6: New developments shall be compatible with, and complementary to, the surrounding land uses, as set forth in the Land Development Code (Ordinance 04-41, adopted June 22, 2004 and effective October 18, 2004, as amended). The proposed amendment will provide a mixed-use development option that is complimentary and compatible with the surrounding land uses, but that does not require integrated mixed uses. Currently, the property is surrounded by a variety of residential and commercial uses. Developing multi-family dwelling units will not impact compatibility with these approved uses. Additionally, the 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 630 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) Vanderbilt Commons MPUD PL20180003366 Evaluation Criteria Page 2 of 3 MPUD provides buffers surrounding the perimeter of the property to provide separation and screening. The amendment does not request to modify the required landscape buffers or walls as required and as shown on the PUD Master Plan. FUTURE LAND USE Policy 7.1: The County shall encourage developers and property owners to connect their properties to fronting collector and arterial roads, except where no such connection can be made without violating intersection spacing requirements of the Land Development Code. The proposed PUD Master Plan provides vehicular ingress/egress to Lots 5 and 6 from Vanderbilt Way, which bisects the MPUD from east to west. Vanderbilt Way provides access to all of the MPUD parcels directly in line with this policy’s intent to provide interconnections to surrounding properties. Please also refer to the Letter of No Impact prepared by Trebilcock Consulting Solutions. FUTURE LAND USE Policy 7.2: The County shall encourage internal accesses or loop roads in an effort to help reduce vehicle congestion on nearby collector and arterial roads and minimize the need for traffic signals. The proposed amendment is in direct compliance with this policy. Encouraging horizontally integrated mixed-use development will provide opportunities for reduced vehicle miles traveled, increased multi-modal options, and a decrease on overall automobile dependence by allowing residents to walk to goods, services and employment within the project and on adjacent properties. FUTURE LAND USE Policy 7.3: All new and existing developments shall be encouraged to connect their local streets and/or interconnection points with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless of land use type. The interconnection of local streets between developments is also addressed in Policy 9.3 of the Transportation Element. The proposed PUD Master Plan provides for interconnections internal to the project, thereby reducing the number of access points onto the arterial roadway network. The MPUD itself provides for interconnections to the surrounding developments through Vanderbilt Way, which as noted above, bisects the property from east to west. FUTURE LAND USE Policy 7.4: The County shall encourage new developments to provide walkable communities with a blend of densities, common open spaces, civic facilities and a range of housing prices and types. In direct compliance with the policy above, the MPUD amendment proposes residential development within a mixed-use development containing both residential and commercial uses. The residential portion provides multi-family residential housing to provide in-demand workforce housing. Therefore, the MPUD amendment directly provides for diversity in the housing market, and in a location where such diversity can be accommodated by existing public infrastructure. The project is also walkable via connections to the surrounding sidewalk and pathway systems. CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT GOAL 6: TO IDENTIFY, PROTECT, CONSERVE AND APPROPRIATELY USE NATIVE VEGETATIVE COMMUNITIES AND WILDLIFE HABITAT. The MPUD will maintain the on-site preserve area as previously approved per Ordinance 2017-47. As shown on the PUD master plan, the project will continue to provide 0.18+/- acres of on-site native habitat preservation. 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 631 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) Vanderbilt Commons MPUD PL20180003366 Evaluation Criteria Page 3 of 3 GOAL 7: TO PROTECT AND CONSERVE THE COUNTY’S FISHERIES AND WILDLIFE. The MPUD locates the required preserve area in the northern portion of the project to allow for connection with offsite preserves within the adjacent RPUD to the north. d. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. The proposed amendment will allow for the development of multi-family residential buildings. The MPUD continues to provide for existing and planned commercial uses to form a well-integrated and compact, horizontal, mixed-use project. The commercial and residential uses are compatible and complimentary to the surrounding existing and future development pattern, thereby ensuring external compatibility. Landscape buffers and open space are provided in accordance with the requirements of the GMP and LDC. This amendment does not request to modify the required wall or buffers on Lots 5 and 6. The amendment reduces the impact to surrounding neighbors thereby increasing compatibility, by allowing the development of the 58-units in a building that does not require commercial uses on the first floor. The number of approved units is not being amended through this request. e. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. The proposed amendment will not modify the minimum requirement for 0.18+/- acres of on-site preserve area. Open space areas that are permitted within this MPUD will continue to meet or exceed the required open space per the LDC. f. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. All required public infrastructure is available and adequate to service the MPUD. g. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. Once fully developed, the subject property will bordered by preserve, residential and commercial developed land on three sides and Vanderbilt Beach Road on the remaining fourth side. Being surrounded by development and off-site preservation areas, the PUD as amended will not have the ability to accommodate expansion outside the development parameters identified within its development standards. Additionally, the mixed-use development program of the overall MPUD will provide opportunities for housing and multi-modal movement through the site that will ultimately reduce the reliance on automobiles further reducing the need to expand. h. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. The project will continue to conform to all applicable PUD regulations, except where a deviation is approved. 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 632 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 February 1, 2019 Page 5 of 11 Previous land use petitions on the subject property: To your knowledge, has a public hearing been held on this property within the last year? If so, what was the nature of that hearing? __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ Official Interpretations or Zoning Verifications: To your knowledge, has there been an official interpretation or zoning verification rendered on this property within the last year? Yes No if so please provide copies. PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIREMENTS This land use petition requires a Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM), pursuant to Chapter 3 E. of the Administrative Code and LDC section 10.03.06. Following the NIM, the applicant will submit a written summary and any commitments that have been made at the meeting. Refer to Chapter 8 B. of the Administrative Code for the NIM procedural requirements. Chapter 8 of the Administrative Code requires that the applicant must remove their public hearing advertising sign(s) after final action is taken by the Board of County Commissioners. Based on the Board's final action on this item, please remove all public hearing advertising sign(s) immediately. RECORDING OF DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS Within 30 days of adoption of the Ordinance, the owner or developer (specify name) at their expense shall record in the Public Records of Collier County a Memorandum of Understanding of Developer Commitments or Notice of Developer Commitments that contains the legal description of the property that is the subject of the land use petition and contains each and every commitment of the owner or developer specified in the Ordinance. The Memorandum or Notice shall be in form acceptable to the County and shall comply with the recording requirements of Chapter 695, FS. A recorded copy of the Memorandum or Notice shall be provided to the Collier County Planned Unit Development Monitoring staff within 15 days of recording of said Memorandum or Notice. LDC subsection 10.02.08 D This application will be considered “open” when the determination of “sufficiency” has been made and the application is assigned a petition processing number. The application will be considered “closed” when the petitioner withdraws the application through written notice or ceases to supply necessary information to continue processing or otherwise actively pursue the rezoning, amendment or change, for a period of 6 months. An application deemed “closed” will not receive further processing and an application “closed” through inactivity shall be deemed withdrawn. An application deemed “closed” may be re-opened by submission of a new application, repayment of all application fees and the grant of a determination of “sufficiency”. Further review of the request will be subject to the then current code. 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 633 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 February 1, 2019 Page 6 of 11 STATEMENT OF UTILITY PROVISIONS FOR PUD REZONE REQUEST APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Name of Applicant(s): _______________________________________________________________ Address: _________________________________ City: ___________ State: ________ ZIP: _______ Telephone: ____________________ Cell: _____________________ Fax: ______________________ E-Mail Address: ____________________________________________________________________ Address of Subject Property (If available): ______________________________________________ City: _________________ State: ________ ZIP: _________ PROPERTY INFORMATION Section/Township/Range: / / Lot: Block: Subdivision: ___________________________________________________ Metes & Bounds Description: _________________________________________________________ Plat Book: Page #: Property I.D. Number: ____________________________________ TYPE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL TO BE PROVIDED Check applicable system: a. County Utility System b. City Utility System c. Franchised Utility System Provide Name: __________________________ d. Package Treatment Plant (GPD Capacity): _________________________ e. Septic System TYPE OF WATER SERVICE TO BE PROVIDED Check applicable system: a. County Utility System b. City Utility System c. Franchised Utility System Provide Name: __________________________ d. Private System (Well) Total Population to be Served: ________________________________________________________ Peak and Average Daily Demands: A. Water-Peak: _________ Average Daily: __________ B. Sewer-Peak: _________ Average Daily: __________ If proposing to be connected to Collier County Regional Water System, please provide the date service is expected to be required: ____________________________________________________ 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 634 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 February 1, 2019 Page 7 of 11 Narrative statement: Provide a brief and concise narrative statement and schematic drawing of sewage treatment process to be used as well as a specific statement regarding the method of affluent and sludge disposal. If percolation ponds are to be used, then percolation data and soil involved shall be provided from tests prepared and certified by a professional engineer. __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ Collier County Utility Dedication Statement: If the project is located within the service boundaries of Collier County’s utility service system, a notarized statement shall be provided agreeing to dedicate the water distribution and sewage collection facilities within the project area to the Collier County Utilities. This shall occur upon completion of the construction of these facilities in accordance with all applicable County ordinances in effect at that time. This statement shall also include an agreement that the applicable system development charges and connection fees will be paid to the County Utilities Division prior to the issuance of building permits by the County. If applicable, the statement shall contain an agreement to dedicate the appropriate utility easements for serving the water and sewer systems. __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ Statement of Availability Capacity from other Providers: Unless waived or otherwise provided for at the pre-application meeting, if the project is to receive sewer or potable water services from any provider other than the County, a statement from that provider indicating adequate capacity to serve the project shall be provided. 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 635 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 February 1, 2019 Page 9 of 11 Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code Amendment to PUD- Ch. 3 G. 2 of the Administrative Code PUD to PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code The following Submittal Requirement checklist is to be utilized during the Pre-Application Meeting and at time of application submittal. At final submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with an up-to-date application. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. A Model PUD Document is available online at http://www.colliercountyfl.gov/Home/ShowDocument?id=76983. REQUIREMENTS # OF COPIES REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Cover Letter with Narrative Statement including a detailed description of why amendment is necessary Completed Application with required attachments (download latest version) 1 Pre-application meeting notes 1 Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized 1 Property Ownership Disclosure Form 1 Notarized and completed Covenant of Unified Control 1 Completed Addressing Checklist 1 Warranty Deed(s) 1 List Identifying Owner and all parties of corporation 1 Signed and sealed Boundary Survey 1 Architectural Rendering of proposed structures 1 Current Aerial Photographs (available from Property Appraiser) with project boundary and, if vegetated, FLUCFCS Codes with legend included on aerial. 1 Statement of Utility Provisions 1 Environmental Data Requirements pursuant to LDC section 3.08.00 1 Environmental Data Requirements collated into a single Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) packet at time of public hearings. Coordinate with project planner at time of public hearings. Listed or Protected Species survey, less than 12 months old. Include copies of previous surveys. 1 Traffic Impact Study 1 Historical Survey 1 School Impact Analysis Application, if applicable 1 Electronic copy of all required documents 1 Completed Exhibits A-F (see below for additional information)+ List of requested deviations from the LDC with justification for each (this document is separate from Exhibit E) Checklist continues on next page 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 636 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 February 1, 2019 Page 10 of 11 Revised Conceptual Master Site Plan 24” x 36”and One 8 ½” x 11” copy Original PUD document/ordinance, and Master Plan 24” x 36” – Only if Amending the PUD Revised PUD document with changes crossed thru & underlined 1 Copy of Official Interpretation and/or Zoning Verification 1 *If located in Immokalee or seeking affordable housing, include an additional set of each submittal requirement +The following exhibits are to be completed on a separate document and attached to the application packet:  Exhibit A: List of Permitted Uses  Exhibit B: Development Standards  Exhibit C: Master Plan- See Chapter 3 E. 1. of the Administrative Code  Exhibit D: Legal Description  Exhibit E: List of Requested LDC Deviations and justification for each  Exhibit F: List of Development Commitments If located in RFMU (Rural Fringe Mixed Use) Receiving Land Areas Pursuant to LDC subsection 2.03.08.A.2.a.2.(b.)i.c., the applicant must contact the Florida Forest Service at 239- 690-3500 for information regarding “Wildfire Mitigation & Prevention Plan.” PLANNERS – INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: School District (Residential Components): Amy Lockheart Conservancy of SWFL: Nichole Johnson Utilities Engineering: Eric Fey Parks and Recreation: Barry Williams & David Berra Emergency Management: Dan Summers Immokalee Water/Sewer District: City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director Other: ASSOCIATED FEES FOR APPLICATION  Pre-Application Meeting: $500.00  PUD Rezone: $10,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre  PUD to PUD Rezone: $8,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre  PUD Amendment: $6,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre  Comprehensive Planning Consistency Review: $2,250.00  Environmental Data Requirements-EIS Packet (submittal determined at pre-application meeting): $2,500.00  Listed or Protected Species Review (when an EIS is not required): $1,000.00  Transportation Review Fees: o Methodology Review: $500.00 *Additional fees to be determined at Methodology Meeting. o Minor Study Review: $750.00 o Major Study Review $1,500.00 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 637 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 638 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) VANDERBILT WAY COMMONS LOTS 5 & 6 PUDA CCPC PACKAGE PL20180003366 PROJECT AERIAL 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 639 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) ² Vanderbilt Beach Road Collier Boulevard/CR 9517th Avenue NWPristine Drive5th Avenue NW Collier Boulevard/CR 951Mission Hills Drive Wolfe Road 3th Avenue NW Weber Boulevard NVanderbilt Commons MPUDAERIAL MAP Vanderbilt WayApartments, LLC Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye. Earthstar Geographics, NES/Airbus DS,USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 640 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) VANDERBILT WAY COMMONS LOTS 5 & 6 PUDA CCPC PACKAGE PL20180003366 COVER LETTER/NARRATIVE OF REQUEST 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 641 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) Vanderbilt Commons MPUD Cover Letter – Request Narrative Page 1 of 2 March 4, 2019 Ms. Nancy Gundlach, AICP, RLA Zoning & Land Development Review Department Community Development & Environmental Services 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 RE: Vanderbilt Commons MPUD PUD Amendment (PUDA-PL20180003366) Dear Ms. Gundlach: The purpose of this PUD Amendment application is to remove the requirement to provide commercial uses on the first floor of the mixed-use buildings on Lots 5 and 6, thereby allowing residential-only buildings in the Vanderbilt Commons Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD). The Vanderbilt Commons MPUD currently allows up to 200,000 square feet of commercial uses and up to 58 dwelling units pursuant to Ordinance 17-47. The amendments requested in this petition are specific to Lots 5 & 6 and no changes made affect any other portion of the MPUD. As currently approved, Lots 5 & 6 can be developed with up to 58 dwelling units with commercial uses required to be provided on the first floor. This request attempts to create a more compatible and complimentary development pattern adjacent to the Wolf Creek RPUD directly north by eliminating more intensive non-residential uses from the tract in proximity to single-family residential. An expansive 300-foot plus preserve is situated between the amendment area and the closest residential units in Wolf Creek, further reducing the impact of development. In addition to the elimination of first-floor commercial, the Applicant is seeking one (1) deviation for reduced width of the required building perimeter plantings, also specific to Lots 5 & 6. Please refer to the enclosed Deviation and Justification narrative for more details. A companion small-scale GMP Amendment (PL20180003372) to the Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Blvd. Commercial Subdistrict has been submitted to remove the text requiring first floor commercial with upper story residential. Per the Pre-Application Meeting Notes, the following items are enclosed for your review: 1. One (1) Check in the amount of $7,625; 2. One (1) copy of the Cover Letter; 3. One (1) copy of the Deviation and Justification Narrative; 4. One (1) copy of the PUDA application; 5. One (1) copy of the Pre-Application Meeting Notes; 6. One (1) copy of the Affidavit of Authorization; 7. One (1) copy of the Property Ownership Disclosure Form; 8. One (1) copy of the Covenant of Unified Control; 9. One (1) copy of the Completed Addressing Checklist; 10. One (1) copy of the Warranty Deed; 11. One (1) copy of the List Identifying Owner; 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 642 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) Vanderbilt Commons MPUD Cover Letter-Request Narrative Page 2 of 2 12. One (1) copy of the Boundary Survey Waiver E-mail; 13. One (1) copy of the Letter of No Impact prepared by Trebilcock Consulting; 14. One (1) copy of the Revised Master Plan (24”x36” and 8 1/2” x 11”); 15. One (1) copy of the Original Zoning Ordinance 17-46; 16. One (1) copy of the revised PUD document in strike-through/underline format; 17. One (1) copy of the Project Aerial; 18. One (1) copy of the Current Zoning Map; 19. One (1) copy of the Existing Land Use Map; and 20. One (1) copy of the Future Land Use Map. Should you require additional information or have any questions, please feel free to contact me directly at (239) 405-7777, extension 2232, or lindsay.robin@waldropengineering.com. Sincerely, WALDROP ENGINEERING, P.A. Lindsay F. Robin, MPA Project Planner Enclosures cc: Ralph Cioffi, Vanderbilt Way Apartments, LLC Jeff Wright, Henderson, Franklin, Starnes & Holt, P.A. Norman J. Trebilcock, Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, LLC Nathalie White, Studio+ 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 643 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) VANDERBILT WAY COMMONS LOTS 5 & 6 PUDA CCPC PACKAGE PL20180003366 EVALUATION CRITERIA 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 644 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) Vanderbilt Commons MPUD PL20180003366 Evaluation Criteria Page 1 of 3 VANDERBILT COMMONS MPUD EVALUATION CRITERIA PUD REZONE CONSIDERATIONS (LDC SECTION 10.02.13.B) a. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. The Vanderbilt Commons MPUD is approved for 200,000 square feet of commercial uses and up to 58 residential dwelling units. The proposed amendment seeks to amend the requirement to provide commercial uses on the first floor of mixed-use buildings on Lots 5 and 6. The amendment does not request additional density or intensity from what is currently approved. Based upon the nature of surrounding uses, the established development pattern in the general area of the property, and the existing levels of public infrastrcture to service the MPUD, the Property is suitable for development of 58 multi-family dwelling units in residential-only buildings as proposed through this application. Moreover, the project will ensure the existing land area within the County’s Urban-designated lands are not underutilized from a public infrastructure standpoint, thereby upholding sound planning principles b. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not toe be provided or maintained at public expense. Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the County Attorney. The subject property is under Unified Control by Vanderbilt Way Apartments, LLC, who has authorized Waldrop Engineering, P.A., and Henderson, Franklin, Starnes & Holt, P.A. to file this application. Please also refer to the enclosed Covenant of Unified Control. c. Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives and policies of the growth management plan. (This is to include identifying what subdistrict, policy or other provision allows the requested uses/density, and fully explaining/addressing all criteria or conditions of that subdistrict, policy or other provision.) Upon adoption of the companion GMPA application the MPUD will remain consistent with the Growth Management Plan (GMP) as follows: FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT Policy 5.2: All applications and petitions for proposed development shall be consistent with this Growth Management Plan, as determined by the Board of County Commissioners. FUTURE LAND USE Policy 5.6: New developments shall be compatible with, and complementary to, the surrounding land uses, as set forth in the Land Development Code (Ordinance 04-41, adopted June 22, 2004 and effective October 18, 2004, as amended). The proposed amendment will provide a mixed-use development option that is complimentary and compatible with the surrounding land uses, but that does not require integrated mixed uses. Currently, the property is surrounded by a variety of residential and commercial uses. Developing 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 645 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) Vanderbilt Commons MPUD PL20180003366 Evaluation Criteria Page 2 of 3 multi-family dwelling units will not impact compatibility with these approved uses. Additionally, the MPUD provides buffers surrounding the perimeter of the property to provide separation and screening. The amendment does not request to modify the required landscape buffers or walls as required and as shown on the PUD Master Plan. FUTURE LAND USE Policy 7.1: The County shall encourage developers and property owners to connect their properties to fronting collector and arterial roads, except where no such connection can be made without violating intersection spacing requirements of the Land Development Code. The proposed PUD Master Plan provides vehicular ingress/egress to Lots 5 and 6 from Vanderbilt Way, which bisects the MPUD from east to west. Vanderbilt Way provides access to all of the MPUD parcels directly in line with this policy’s intent to provide interconnections to surrounding properties. Please also refer to the Letter of No Impact prepared by Trebilcock Consulting Solutions. FUTURE LAND USE Policy 7.2: The County shall encourage internal accesses or loop roads in an effort to help reduce vehicle congestion on nearby collector and arterial roads and minimize the need for traffic signals. The proposed amendment is in direct compliance with this policy. Encouraging horizontally integrated mixed-use development will provide opportunities for reduced vehicle miles traveled, increased multi-modal options, and a decrease on overall automobile dependence by allowing residents to walk to goods, services and employment within the project and on adjacent properties. FUTURE LAND USE Policy 7.3: All new and existing developments shall be encouraged to connect their local streets and/or interconnection points with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless of land use type. The interconnection of local streets between developments is also addressed in Policy 9.3 of the Transportation Element. The proposed PUD Master Plan provides for interconnections internal to the project, thereby reducing the number of access points onto the arterial roadway network. The MPUD itself provides for interconnections to the surrounding developments through Vanderbilt Way, which as noted above, bisects the property from east to west. FUTURE LAND USE Policy 7.4: The County shall encourage new developments to provide walkable communities with a blend of densities, common open spaces, civic facilities and a range of housing prices and types. In direct compliance with the policy above, the MPUD amendment proposes residential development within a mixed-use development containing both residential and commercial uses. The residential portion provides multi-family residential housing to provide in-demand workforce housing. Therefore, the MPUD amendment directly provides for diversity in the housing market, and in a location where such diversity can be accommodated by existing public infrastructure. The project is also walkable via connections to the surrounding sidewalk and pathway systems. CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT GOAL 6: TO IDENTIFY, PROTECT, CONSERVE AND APPROPRIATELY USE NATIVE VEGETATIVE COMMUNITIES AND WILDLIFE HABITAT. The MPUD will maintain the on-site preserve area as previously approved per Ordinance 2017-47. As shown on the PUD master plan, the project will continue to provide 0.18+/- acres of on-site native habitat preservation. 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 646 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) Vanderbilt Commons MPUD PL20180003366 Evaluation Criteria Page 3 of 3 GOAL 7: TO PROTECT AND CONSERVE THE COUNTY’S FISHERIES AND WILDLIFE. The MPUD locates the required preserve area in the northern portion of the project to allow for connection with offsite preserves within the adjacent RPUD to the north. d. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. The proposed amendment will allow for the development of multi-family residential buildings. The MPUD continues to provide for existing and planned commercial uses to form a well-integrated and compact, horizontal, mixed-use project. The commercial and residential uses are compatible and complimentary to the surrounding existing and future development pattern, thereby ensuring external compatibility. Landscape buffers and open space are provided in accordance with the requirements of the GMP and LDC. This amendment does not request to modify the required wall or buffers on Lots 5 and 6. The amendment reduces the impact to surrounding neighbors thereby increasing compatibility, by allowing the development of the 58-units in a building that does not require commercial uses on the first floor. The number of approved units is not being amended through this request. e. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. The proposed amendment will not modify the minimum requirement for 0.18+/- acres of on-site preserve area. Open space areas that are permitted within this MPUD will continue to meet or exceed the required open space per the LDC. f. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. All required public infrastructure is available and adequate to service the MPUD. g. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. Once fully developed, the subject property will bordered by preserve, residential and commercial developed land on three sides and Vanderbilt Beach Road on the remaining fourth side. Being surrounded by development and off-site preservation areas, the PUD as amended will not have the ability to accommodate expansion outside the development parameters identified within its development standards. Additionally, the mixed-use development program of the overall MPUD will provide opportunities for housing and multi-modal movement through the site that will ultimately reduce the reliance on automobiles further reducing the need to expand. h. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. The project will continue to conform to all applicable PUD regulations, except where a deviation is approved. 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 647 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) VANDERBILT WAY COMMONS LOTS 5 & 6 PUDA CCPC PACKAGE PL20180003366 PRE-APPLICATION MEETING NOTES 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 648 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 649 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 650 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 651 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 652 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 653 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 654 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 655 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 656 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 657 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 658 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 659 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 660 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 661 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) VANDERBILT WAY COMMONS LOTS 5 & 6 PUDA CCPC PACKAGE PL20180003366 EXECUTED AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 662 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 663 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) VANDERBILT WAY COMMONS LOTS 5 & 6 PUDA CCPC PACKAGE PL20180003366 EXECUTED DISCLOSURE FORM 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 664 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Created 9/28/2017 Page 1 of 3 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DISCLOSURE FORM This is a required form with all land use petitions, except for Appeals and Zoning Verification Letters. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. Please complete the following, use additional sheets if necessary. a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest: Name and Address % of Ownership b. If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each: Name and Address % of Ownership c. If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest: Name and Address % of Ownership 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 665 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Created 9/28/2017 Page 2 of 3 d. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and/or limited partners: Name and Address % of Ownership e. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners: Name and Address % of Ownership Date of Contract: ___________ f. If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or officers, if a corporation, partnership, or trust: Name and Address g. Date subject property acquired _______________ Leased: Term of lease ____________ years /months If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following: 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 666 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 667 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) VANDERBILT WAY COMMONS LOTS 5 & 6 PUDA CCPC PACKAGE PL20180003366 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP INFORMATION 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 668 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) VANDERBILT COMMONS MPUD DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST Lots 5 and 6 of Vanderbilt Commons is owned in fee simple by Vanderbilt Commons, LLC Vanderbilt Commons LLC Manager - Ralph R. Cioffi, Jr. Member/Ownership % - • Vanderbilt Way Apartments, LLC - 100% VANDERBILT WAY APARTMENTS LLC Manager - Ralph R. Cioffi, Jr. Members/Ownership % - • Vandy Way LLC - 70% Manager - Ralph R. Cioffi, Jr. Member/Ownership % - Ralph R. Cioffi, Jr. - 100% • 227 Partners LLC - 20% Authorized Members - Juergen F. Mross and Lori A. Mross • IRC Investments LLC - 10% Manager - IRC Management, LLC Manager of Manager - Rainier N. Filthaut 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 669 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) VANDERBILT WAY COMMONS LOTS 5 & 6 PUDA CCPC PACKAGE PL20180003366 EXECUTED COVENANT OF UNIFIED CONTROL 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 670 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 671 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 672 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) VANDERBILT WAY COMMONS LOTS 5 & 6 PUDA CCPC PACKAGE PL20180003366 FUTURE LAND USE MAP 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 673 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) ² Vanderbilt Commons MPUDFUTURE LAND USE MAP Estates Designation Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict Vanderbilt Beach/Collier BlvdCommercial Subdistrict Vanderbilt WayApartments, LLC Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye. Earthstar Geographics, NES/Airbus DS,USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community 0 500 1,000250 Feet Wolfe Road Collier Boulevard/CR 951Mission Hills Drive Vanderbilt Beach Road 7th Avenue NW 5th Avenue NW Collier Boulevard/CR 951Pristine Drive9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 674 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) VANDERBILT WAY COMMONS LOTS 5 & 6 PUDA CCPC PACKAGE PL20180003366 EXISTING LAND USE MAP 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 675 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) ² Vanderbilt Beach Road Collier Boulevard/CR 9517th Avenue NWPristine Drive5th Avenue NW Collier Boulevard/CR 951Wolfe Road Vanderbilt Commons MPUDEXISTING LAND USE MAP Vanderbilt WayApartments, LLC 0 500 1,000250 Feet Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye. Earthstar Geographics, NES/Airbus DS,USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community Preserve Single-Family Residential (Golden Gate) Single-Family Residential (Islandwalk) Multi-Family Residential (Summit Place) Existing Institutional (St. Agnes Church) Vacant Agriculture (Nursery) Preserve Single-Family Residential (Raffia Preserve)Single-Family Residential (Summit Place) Single-Family Residential (Tuscany Pointe) Multi-Family Residential (Portofino Falls) Single-Family Residential (Black Bear Ridge) Existing Commercial (Mission Hills Shopping Center) Single-Family Residential (Golden Gate) 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 676 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) VANDERBILT WAY COMMONS LOTS 5 & 6 PUDA CCPC PACKAGE PL20180003366 CURRENT ZONING MAP 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 677 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) ² Vanderbilt Beach Road Collier Boulevard/CR 9517th Avenue NWPristine Drive5th Avenue NW Collier Boulevard/CR 951Mission Hills Drive Wolfe Road Vanderbilt Commons MPUDCURRENT ZONING MAP PUD A Vanderbilt WayApartments, LLC RPUD MPUD 0 500 1,000250 Feet Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye. Earthstar Geographics, NES/Airbus DS,USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community E A Rural Agricultural E EstatePUD Planned Unit DevelopmentRPUD Residential Planned Unit DevelopmentMPUD Mixed Use Planned Unit Development Zoning Districts PUD MPUD PUD MPUD RPUD RPUD PUD MPUD RPUD A 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 678 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) VANDERBILT WAY COMMONS LOTS 5 & 6 PUDA CCPC PACKAGE PL20180003366 ADDRESSING CHECKLIST 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 679 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 ADDRESSING CHECKLIST Please complete the following and email to GMD_Addressing@colliergov.net or fax to the Operations Division at 239-252-5724 or submit in person to the Addressing Section at the above address. Form must be signed by Addressing personnel prior to pre-application meeting, please allow 3 days for processing. Not all items will apply to every project. Items in bold type are required. FOLIO NUMBERS MUST BE PROVIDED. Forms older than 6 months will require additional review and approval by the Addressing Section. PETITION TYPE (Indicate type below, complete a separate Addressing Checklist for each Petition type) BL (Blasting Permit) BD (Boat Dock Extension) Carnival/Circus Permit CU (Conditional Use) EXP (Excavation Permit) FP (Final Plat LLA (Lot Line Adjustment) PNC (Project Name Change) PPL (Plans & Plat Review) PSP (Preliminary Subdivision Plat) PUD Rezone RZ (Standard Rezone) SDP (Site Development Plan) SDPA (SDP Amendment) SDPI (Insubstantial Change to SDP) SIP (Site Im provement Plan) SIPI (Insubstantial Change to SIP) SNR (Street Name Change) SNC (Street Name Change – Unplatted) TDR (Transfer of Development Rights) VA (Variance) VRP (Vegetation Removal Permit) VRSFP (Vegetation Removal & Site Fill Permit) OTHER LEGAL DESCRIPT ION of subject property or properties (copy of lengthy description may be attached) FOLIO (Property ID) NUMBER(s) of above (attach to, or associate with, legal description if more than one) STREET ADDRESS or ADDRESSES (as applicable, if already assigned) PROPOSED STREET NAMES (if applicable) SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NUMBER (for existing projects/sites only) LOCATION MAP must be attached showing exact location of project/site in relation to nearest public road right- of-way PROPOSED PROJECT NAME (if applicable) SDP - or AR or PL # SURVEY (copy - needed only for unplatted properties) CURRENT PROJECT NAME (if applicable) Rev. 6/9/2017 Page 1 of 2 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 680 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 Please Return Approved Checklist By: Email Personally picked up Applicant Name: Signature on Addressing Checklist does not constitute Project and/or Street Name approval and is subject to further review by the Operations Division. FOR STAFF USE ONLY Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Approved by: Date: Updated by: Date: IF OLDER THAN 6 MONTHS, FORM MUST BE UPDATED OR NEW FORM SUBMITTED Fax Email/Fax:Phone: Project or development names proposed for, or already appearing in, condominium documents (if application; indicate whether proposed or existing) Rev. 6/9/2017 Page 2 of 2 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 681 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) LOCATION MAP 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 682 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) VANDERBILT WAY COMMONS LOTS 5 & 6 PUDA CCPC PACKAGE PL20180003366 WARRANTY DEEDS 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 683 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 684 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 685 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 686 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 687 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) VANDERBILT WAY COMMONS LOTS 5 & 6 PUDA CCPC PACKAGE PL20180003366 LIST IDENTIFYING ALL PROPERTY OWNERS & PARTIES OF THE CORPORATION 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 688 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 2/27/2019 Detail by Entity Name http://search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/CorporationSearch/SearchResultDetail?inquirytype=EntityName&directionType=Initial&searchNameOrder=VANDERBI…2/2 Document Number FEI/EIN Number Date Filed State Status Detail by Entity Name Florida Limited Liability Company VANDERBILT WAY APARTMENTS, LLC Filing Information L18000137672 NONE 06/05/2018 FL ACTIVE Principal Address 2950 TAMIAMI TRAIL NORTH, SUITE 200 NAPLES, FL 34103 Changed: 07/11/2018 Mailing Address 2950 TAMIAMI TRAIL NORTH, SUITE 200 NAPLES, FL 34103 Changed: 07/11/2018 Registered Agent Name & Address DENTI, KEVIN A, ESQ 2180 IMMOKALEE RD STE 316 NAPLES, FL 34110 Authorized Person(s) Detail Name & Address Title MGR CIOFFI, JR, RALPH R 2950 TAMIAMI TRAIL NORTH, SUITE 200 NAPLES, FL 34103 Annual Reports No Annual Reports Filed Document Images 06/05/2018 -- Florida Limited Liability View image in PDF format Florida Department of State, Division of Corporations 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 689 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) VANDERBILT WAY COMMONS LOTS 5 & 6 PUDA CCPC PACKAGE PL20180003366 BOUNDARY SURVEY WAIVER EMAIL 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 690 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) From:BellowsRay To:GundlachNancy Cc:Lindsay Robin Subject:RE: Is a Boundary Survey Required for Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 and 6 PUDA (PL20180003366) Date:Friday, March 1, 2019 12:18:37 PM Attachments:image001.png oledata.mso A boundary survey can be waived if the proposed amendment is minor and doesn’t change the PUD boundary. In this case, the survey can be waived.   Ray   Raymond V. Bellows, Zoning Manager Zoning Division - Zoning Services Section Growth Management Department Telephone: 239.252.2463; Fax: 239.252.6350 Exceeding expectations, every day!   Tell us how we are doing by taking our Zoning Division Survey at https://goo.gl/eXjvqT.       From: GundlachNancy <Nancy.Gundlach@colliercountyfl.gov>  Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2019 5:09 PM To: BellowsRay <Ray.Bellows@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: Lindsay.Robin@waldropengineering.com Subject: Is a Boundary Survey Required for Vanderbilt Commons Lots 5 and 6 PUDA (PL20180003366)   Hi Ray,   I received a phone call from Lindsay Robin of Waldrop Engineering (908-3079).  She would like to know if a Boundary Survey is required.  (I checked the box for a Boundary Survey on the pre-app notes recently).    The proposal is to eliminate the requirement to locate residential units atop commercial units on the first floor.   Could you confirm if a Boundary Survey is required?   Thank you-   Respectfully,   Nancy 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 691 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) Nancy Gundlach, AICP, PLA Principal Planner Zoning Services   (239)252-2484   Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 692 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) VANDERBILT WAY COMMONS LOTS 5 & 6 PUDA CCPC PACKAGE PL20180003366 STATEMENT OF UTILITY PROVISIONS 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 693 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 February 1, 2019 Page 6 of 11 STATEMENT OF UTILITY PROVISIONS FOR PUD REZONE REQUEST APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Name of Applicant(s): _______________________________________________________________ Address: _________________________________ City: ___________ State: ________ ZIP: _______ Telephone: ____________________ Cell: _____________________ Fax: ______________________ E-Mail Address: ____________________________________________________________________ Address of Subject Property (If available): ______________________________________________ City: _________________ State: ________ ZIP: _________ PROPERTY INFORMATION Section/Township/Range: / / Lot: Block: Subdivision: ___________________________________________________ Metes & Bounds Description: _________________________________________________________ Plat Book: Page #: Property I.D. Number: ____________________________________ TYPE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL TO BE PROVIDED Check applicable system: a. County Utility System b. City Utility System c. Franchised Utility System Provide Name: __________________________ d. Package Treatment Plant (GPD Capacity): _________________________ e. Septic System TYPE OF WATER SERVICE TO BE PROVIDED Check applicable system: a. County Utility System b. City Utility System c. Franchised Utility System Provide Name: __________________________ d. Private System (Well) Total Population to be Served: ________________________________________________________ Peak and Average Daily Demands: A. Water-Peak: _________ Average Daily: __________ B. Sewer-Peak: _________ Average Daily: __________ If proposing to be connected to Collier County Regional Water System, please provide the date service is expected to be required: ____________________________________________________ 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 694 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 February 1, 2019 Page 7 of 11 Narrative statement: Provide a brief and concise narrative statement and schematic drawing of sewage treatment process to be used as well as a specific statement regarding the method of affluent and sludge disposal. If percolation ponds are to be used, then percolation data and soil involved shall be provided from tests prepared and certified by a professional engineer. __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ Collier County Utility Dedication Statement: If the project is located within the service boundaries of Collier County’s utility service system, a notarized statement shall be provided agreeing to dedicate the water distribution and sewage collection facilities within the project area to the Collier County Utilities. This shall occur upon completion of the construction of these facilities in accordance with all applicable County ordinances in effect at that time. This statement shall also include an agreement that the applicable system development charges and connection fees will be paid to the County Utilities Division prior to the issuance of building permits by the County. If applicable, the statement shall contain an agreement to dedicate the appropriate utility easements for serving the water and sewer systems. __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ Statement of Availability Capacity from other Providers: Unless waived or otherwise provided for at the pre-application meeting, if the project is to receive sewer or potable water services from any provider other than the County, a statement from that provider indicating adequate capacity to serve the project shall be provided. 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 695 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) VANDERBILT WAY COMMONS LOTS 5 & 6 PUDA CCPC PACKAGE PL20180003366 TRAFFIC STATEMENT OF NO ADDITIONAL IMPACTS 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 696 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA  2800 Davis Boulevard, Suite 200  Naples, FL 34104 Phone 239-566-9551  ntrebilcock@trebilcock.biz  www.trebilcock.biz March 6, 2019 Ray Bellows Zoning Planning Manager Collier County Zoning Services 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 SUBJECT: Vanderbilt Commons PUD Lots 5 and 6-- PL20180003372; PL20180003366 Transportation Statement of No Additional Impacts Dear Mr. Bellows: The purpose of this letter is to provide an evaluation and statement of no additional transportation impacts and to clarify Institute of Transportation Engineers Land Use Codes (ITE LUC) as compared to Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) codes identified as allowable uses for the project. The proposed PUD land uses are not changing, just the elimination of the requirement regarding commercial on the first floor of the residential buildings. This does not change the project’s calculated traffic impact, since the project will still be mixed use and benefit from the applicable internal capture values assumed in the traffic analysis. With respect to SIC codes, the following table covers the SIC and ITE LUC’s that may likely be used for the lots: Development ITE Land Use (Relevant SIC in Parenthesis) ITE Land Use Code Residential Condominiums/Townhouses/Apartment (Not Applicable) 220; 230 Commercial General Office (73XX, 63XX, 86XX, 87XX, 9XXX, 65XX, and 62XX approved uses) 710 Medical Office (8011 through 8049) 720 Shopping Center (all PUD permitted uses possible—typical for a shopping center—as an inline/outparcel use—refer to PUD for applicable SIC Codes) 820 Let me know if you have any questions, or need anything else. Sincerely, Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Norman J. Trebilcock, AICP, P.E. President 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 697 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) VANDERBILT WAY COMMONS LOTS 5 & 6 PUDA CCPC PACKAGE PL20180003366 PUD CONCEPT PLAN (8.5”x 11” & 24”x 36”) 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 698 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) TRACT A - VANDERBILT WAY R.O.W / A.E. / P.U.E. / D.E. / C.U.E. RPUD WOLF CREEK (PRESERVE) TRACT C (PRESERVE AREA, C.E.) LOT #6LOT #5 TRACT B (WATER MANAGEMENT) LOT #4 LOT #1 LOT #2 LOT #3 LIFT STATION LOCATION VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD (RIGHT-OF-WAY)PRISTINE DRIVE (RIGHT-OF-WAY)BUCKSTONE DRIVE (RIGHT-OF-WAY)PUD MISSION HILLS TRACT 1 (COMMERCIAL) PUD MISSION HILLS TRACT 5 (COMMERCIAL) RPUD WOLF CREEK (RESIDENTIAL) RPUD WOLF CREEK (RESIDENTIAL) 20' TYPE D LANDSCAPE BUFFER 20' TYPE D LANDSCAPEBUFFER10' TYPE D LANDSCAPE BUFFER 20' TYPE D LANDSCAPE BUFFER10' TYPE D LANDSCAPE BUFFER 10' TYPE A LANDSCAPE BUFFER 10' TYPE A LANDSCAPE BUFFER 10' TYPE D LANDSCAPE BUFFER 10' TYPE D LANDSCAPE BUFFER 20' TYPE D LANDSCAPE BUFFER20' TYPE D LANDSCAPE BUFFER6 FOOT HIGH WALL 10' TYPE A LANDSCAPE BUFFER 4 FOOT HIGH WALL 4 FOOT HIGH WALL20' TYPE D LANDSCAPE BUFFERB:\Projects\949-001 (Studio+) Vanderbilt Way Apartments - Planning\Drawings-Exhibits\949-001-01 MCP\Current Plans\9490010101.dwgDEVIATIONS DEVIATION FROM LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE (LDC) SECTION 5.06.04.G TO ALLOW ONE DOUBLE-FACED OFF-PREMISES SIGN WITH A MAXIMUM OF 8 FEET IN HEIGHT AND 32 SQUARE FEET IN AREA, LOCATED IN THE ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY (LABELED PRISTINE DRIVE ON EXHIBIT "A"). THE SIGN WILL BE LIMITED TO NO MORE THAN 3 RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS WITHIN THE ABUTTING WOLF CREEK PUD. THE PROPOSED SIGN MUST MEET ALL VEHICULAR SAFETY SIGHT DISTANCES STANDARDS FOR COLLIER COUNTY AND HAVE A MINIMUM 10-FOOT SETBACK FROM VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY. THE PROPOSED SIGN MUST BE EXTERNALLY ILLUMINATED ONLY. ONCE PRISTINE DRIVE IS ACCEPTED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AS A PUBLIC ROAD, ANY STRUCTURAL CHANGES TO THE SIGN SHALL REQUIRE A RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT. THE SIGNAGE SHALL BE PERPETUALLY MAINTAINED BY THE THE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATIONS OF THE DEVELOPMENTS NAMED ON THE SIGN. THE COUNTY AT THE TIME AFTER THE ROAD BECOMES PUBLIC MAY REQUIRE THE SIGN TO BE RELOCATED FOR ROAD EXPANSION OR TO ADDRESS CAPACITY OR SAFETY ISSUES. DEVIATION FROM LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE (LDC) SECTION 5.03.02 H.1.b, WHICH REQUIRES A WALL IF LOCATED ON A PROPERTY OPPOSITE A RESIDENTIALLY ZONED DISTRICT BUT FRONTING ON A LOCAL STREET OR ROADWAY, OR THE PROPERTIES ARE SEPARATED BY A PLATTED ALLEY, THEN HEIGHT SHALL BE 4 FEET AND PLACEMENT SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 3 FEET FROM THE REAR OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY LANDSCAPE BUFFER LINE, TO INSTEAD REMOVE THE REQUIREMENT TO PLACE A WALL ALONG VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD. DEVIATION FROM LDC SECTION 4.06.05.C. “BUILDING FOUNDATION PLANTING REQUIREMENTS”, WHICH REQUIRES BUILDING FOUNDATION PLANTING BEDS FOR BUILDING FOOTPRINTS OVER 10,000 SQUARE FEET TO BE A MINIMUM WIDTH OF 10-FEET, TO ALLOW THE MINIMUM WIDTH OF THE PLANTING BEDS TO BE 8-FEET. THE APPLICANT WILL PROVIDE AN ADDITIONAL FIVE (5) SOLITAIRE PALMS PLANTED WITH 10-FOOT CLEAR TRUNK TO SUPPLEMENT THE AREA OF FOUNDATION PLANTINGS AND NUMBER OF TREES REQUIRED BY LDC SECTION 4.06.05.C. THIS DEVIATION SHALL ONLY APPLY TO LOTS 5 AND 6 OF THE MPUD. 1 2 MPUD SUMMARY THE VANDERBILT COMMONS MIXED USE PUD IS A PROJECT COMPRISED OF 14.49 ACRES DESIGNATED FOR COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL LAND USES AND THE COMMERCIAL USES ARE LIMITED TO A MAXIMUM OF 200,000 SQUARE FEET OF GROSS LEASABLE AREA AND THE RESIDENTIAL LAND USES ARE LIMITED TO A MAXIMUM OF 58 DWELLING UNITS. ALL RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS SHALL BE LOCATED IN MIXED-USE BUILDINGS WITH COMMERCIAL USES SITUATED ON AT LEAST THE FIRST FLOOR. COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL LAND USES AND SIGNAGE ARE DESIGNED TO BE HARMONIOUS WITH ONE ANOTHER IN A NATURAL SETTING BY USING COMMON ARCHITECTURE, QUALITY SCREENING/ BUFFERING AND NATIVE VEGETATION. ACCESS TO ALL PARCELS, WITHIN THE VANDERBILT COMMONS SUBDIVISION PLAT, RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 60, PAGE 31 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, OR AS AMENDED, SHALL BE FROM VANDERBILT WAY. MPUD LAND USE SUMMARY USE WATER MANAGEMENT (TRACT B) PRESERVE AREA (TRACT C) LANDSCAPE BUFFERS UTILITY EASEMENT/ VANDERBILT WAY R.O.W. DEVELOPABLE AREA (LOTS 1-6) TOTAL SITE AREA ACRES +/- 1.28 AC +/- 0.18 AC +/- 1.44 AC +/- 1.71 AC +/- 9.88 AC +/- 14.49 AC SET NUMBER: SHEET :1 949-001-01PLAN REVISIONSFLORIDA CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION #8636WALDROPENGINEERINGLAND DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS28100 BONITA GRANDE DRIVE - SUITE 305 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135VANDERBILT COMMONSMPUDCLIENT: VANDERBILT WAY APARTMENTS, LLCPUD MASTER PLANREVISED PER COUNTY COMMENTS06/14/19213 1 2 2 3 3 0 SCALE IN FEET 100 200 400REVISED PER COUNTY COMMENTS04/17/199.A.2.i Packet Pg. 699 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) TRACT A - VANDERBILT WAY R.O.W / A.E. / P.U.E. / D.E. / C.U.E. RPUD WOLF CREEK (PRESERVE) TRACT C (PRESERVE AREA, C.E.) LOT #6LOT #5 TRACT B (WATER MANAGEMENT) LOT #4 LOT #1 LOT #2 LOT #3 LIFT STATION LOCATION VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD (RIGHT-OF-WAY)PRISTINE DRIVE (RIGHT-OF-WAY)BUCKSTONE DRIVE (RIGHT-OF-WAY)PUD MISSION HILLS TRACT 1 (COMMERCIAL) PUD MISSION HILLS TRACT 5 (COMMERCIAL) RPUD WOLF CREEK (RESIDENTIAL) RPUD WOLF CREEK (RESIDENTIAL) 20' TYPE D LANDSCAPE BUFFER 20' TYPE D LANDSCAPEBUFFER10' TYPE D LANDSCAPE BUFFER 20' TYPE D LANDSCAPE BUFFER10' TYPE D LANDSCAPE BUFFER 10' TYPE A LANDSCAPE BUFFER 10' TYPE A LANDSCAPE BUFFER 10' TYPE D LANDSCAPE BUFFER 10' TYPE D LANDSCAPE BUFFER 20' TYPE D LANDSCAPE BUFFER20' TYPE D LANDSCAPE BUFFER6 FOOT HIGH WALL 10' TYPE A LANDSCAPE BUFFER 4 FOOT HIGH WALL 4 FOOT HIGH WALL20' TYPE D LANDSCAPE BUFFER1 0 SCALE IN FEET 30 60 120WALDROPENGINEERINGCIVIL ENGINEERING &LAND DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTSSET NUMBER: SHEET :28100 BONITA GRANDE DRIVE - SUITE 305 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135P: 239-405-7777 F: 239-405-7899 EMAIL: info@waldropengineering.comB:\Projects\949-001 (Studio+) Vanderbilt Way Apartments - Planning\Drawings-Exhibits\949-001-01 MCP\Current Plans\9490010101.dwg6/14/2019 2:55:05 PM04/17/19REVISED PER CLIENT AND COUNTY COMMENTSFLORIDA CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION #8636PLAN REVISIONSREV00 <<SUBMITTED / BID SET>> XX/XX/XX949-001-011MPUD SUMMARY THE VANDERBILT COMMONS MIXED USE PUD IS A PROJECT COMPRISED OF 14.49 ACRES DESIGNATED FOR COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL LAND USES AND THE COMMERCIAL USES ARE LIMITED TO A MAXIMUM OF 200,000 SQUARE FEET OF GROSS LEASABLE AREA AND THE RESIDENTIAL LAND USES ARE LIMITED TO A MAXIMUM OF 58 DWELLING UNITS. ALL RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS SHALL BE LOCATED IN MIXED-USE BUILDINGS WITH COMMERCIAL USES SITUATED ON AT LEAST THE FIRST FLOOR. COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL LAND USES AND SIGNAGE ARE DESIGNED TO BE HARMONIOUS WITH ONE ANOTHER IN A NATURAL SETTING BY USING COMMON ARCHITECTURE, QUALITY SCREENING/ BUFFERING AND NATIVE VEGETATION. ACCESS TO ALL PARCELS, WITHIN THE VANDERBILT COMMONS SUBDIVISION PLAT, RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 60, PAGE 31 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, OR AS AMENDED, SHALL BE FROM VANDERBILT WAY. MPUD LAND USE SUMMARY USE WATER MANAGEMENT (TRACT B) PRESERVE AREA (TRACT C) LANDSCAPE BUFFERS UTILITY EASEMENT/ VANDERBILT WAY R.O.W. DEVELOPABLE AREA (LOTS 1-6) TOTAL SITE AREA ACRES +/- 1.28 AC +/- 0.18 AC +/- 1.44 AC +/- 1.71 AC +/- 9.88 AC +/- 14.49 AC DEVIATIONS DEVIATION FROM LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE (LDC) SECTION 5.06.04.G TO ALLOW ONE DOUBLE-FACED OFF-PREMISES SIGN WITH A MAXIMUM OF 8 FEET IN HEIGHT AND 32 SQUARE FEET IN AREA, LOCATED IN THE ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY (LABELED PRISTINE DRIVE ON EXHIBIT "A"). THE SIGN WILL BE LIMITED TO NO MORE THAN 3 RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS WITHIN THE ABUTTING WOLF CREEK PUD. THE PROPOSED SIGN MUST MEET ALL VEHICULAR SAFETY SIGHT DISTANCES STANDARDS FOR COLLIER COUNTY AND HAVE A MINIMUM 10-FOOT SETBACK FROM VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY. THE PROPOSED SIGN MUST BE EXTERNALLY ILLUMINATED ONLY. ONCE PRISTINE DRIVE IS ACCEPTED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AS A PUBLIC ROAD, ANY STRUCTURAL CHANGES TO THE SIGN SHALL REQUIRE A RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT. THE SIGNAGE SHALL BE PERPETUALLY MAINTAINED BY THE THE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATIONS OF THE DEVELOPMENTS NAMED ON THE SIGN. THE COUNTY AT THE TIME AFTER THE ROAD BECOMES PUBLIC MAY REQUIRE THE SIGN TO BE RELOCATED FOR ROAD EXPANSION OR TO ADDRESS CAPACITY OR SAFETY ISSUES. DEVIATION FROM LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE (LDC) SECTION 5.03.02 H.1.b, WHICH REQUIRES A WALL IF LOCATED ON A PROPERTY OPPOSITE A RESIDENTIALLY ZONED DISTRICT BUT FRONTING ON A LOCAL STREET OR ROADWAY, OR THE PROPERTIES ARE SEPARATED BY A PLATTED ALLEY, THEN HEIGHT SHALL BE 4 FEET AND PLACEMENT SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 3 FEET FROM THE REAR OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY LANDSCAPE BUFFER LINE, TO INSTEAD REMOVE THE REQUIREMENT TO PLACE A WALL ALONG VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD. DEVIATION FROM LDC SECTION 4.06.05.C. “BUILDING FOUNDATION PLANTING REQUIREMENTS”, WHICH REQUIRES BUILDING FOUNDATION PLANTING BEDS FOR BUILDING FOOTPRINTS OVER 10,000 SQUARE FEET TO BE A MINIMUM WIDTH OF 10-FEET, TO ALLOW THE MINIMUM WIDTH OF THE PLANTING BEDS TO BE 8-FEET. THE APPLICANT WILL PROVIDE AN ADDITIONAL FIVE (5) SOLITAIRE PALMS PLANTED WITH 10-FOOT CLEAR TRUNK TO SUPPLEMENT THE AREA OF FOUNDATION PLANTINGS AND NUMBER OF TREES REQUIRED BY LDC SECTION 4.06.05.C. THIS DEVIATION SHALL ONLY APPLY TO LOTS 5 AND 6 OF THE MPUD. 1 2 PUD MASTER PLANVANDERBILTCOMMONS MPUDCLIENT: VANDERBILT WAY APRTMENTS, LLC1 2 2 3 3 3 06/14/19REVISED PER COUNTY COMMENTS29.A.2.i Packet Pg. 700 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) VANDERBILT WAY COMMONS LOTS 5 & 6 PUDA CCPC PACKAGE PL20180003366 AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLIANCE – NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 701 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 702 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) May 16, 2019 RE: Vanderbilt Commons PUDA-PL20180003366 GMPA-PL20180003372 Dear Property Owner: Please be advised that Waldrop Engineering, P.A. on behalf of Vanderbilt Way Apartments, LLC has filed two (2) concurrent applications to Collier County. These applications seek approval of: (1) a PUD amendment for the Vanderbilt Commons Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) to remove the requirement to provide commercial uses on the first floor of the mixed-use building on Lots 5 and 6, and add one (1) deviation relating to building perimeter plantings; AND (2) a Growth Management Plan amendment (GMPA) to allow residential uses on the first floor of buildings on Lots 5 and 6. The GMPA does not request to increase density or intensity and no changes made affect any other portion of the MPUD. The subject property totals 14.49+/- acres and is generally located immediately north of Vanderbilt Beach Road, approximately ¼ of a mile west of Collier Boulevard in unincorporated Collier County, Florida. In compliance with the Land Development Code requirements, a Neighborhood Information Meeting will be held to provide you an opportunity to hear a presentation about this application and ask questions. The Neighborhood Information Meeting will be held on Monday, June 3rd, 2019 at 5:30 p.m. at the Greater Naples Fire Rescue Headquarters, 14575 Collier Blvd., Naples, FL 34119. Should you have questions prior to the meeting, please contact me directly at (239) 405-7777 ext. 2232, or lindsay.robin@waldropengineering.com. Sincerely, WALDROP ENGINEERING, P.A. Lindsay F. Robin, MPA Project Planner *Please note that Greater Naples Fire Rescue does not sponsor or endorse this program. 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 703 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) PL20180003366 500' 5/7/2019 Site: Vanderbilt Commons MPUD 1 NAME1 NAME2 NAME3 NAME4 NAME5 NAME6 7205 VANDERBILT WAY LLC PTA-CS# 5406 PO BOX 320099 ALEXANDRIA, VA 22320---0 ABREU, MILAGROS PO BOX 117 KEASBEY, NJ 08832---117 ALLEN, MARCUS A & MARY L 7347 ACORN WAY NAPLES, FL 34119---8091 ANDREEV, BORISLAV VIOLETA ANDREEV 158 RANKIN CRES TORONTO M6P 4H9 AVENOSO, DONALD G 7355 ACORN WAY NAPLES, FL 34119---0 BARRIOS, HARVY E NUVIA AGUILERA DE BARRIOS 7029 AMBROSIA LN APT 606 NAPLES, FL 34119---9651 BCNMD INC 2600 S DOUGLAS ROAD SUITE #510 CORAL GABLES, FL 33134---0 BCNMD INC 2600 S DOUGLAS ROAD #510 CORAL GABLES, FL 33134---0 BCNMD INC 2600 S DOUGLAS ROAD #510 CORAL GABLES, FL 33134---0 BCNMD INC 2600 S DOUGLAS ROAD #510 CORAL GABLES, FL 33134---0 BEADLE, RYAN J & TONYA 7359 ACORN WAY NAPLES, FL 34119---0 BLACK BEAR RIDGE PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION INC % CARDINAL PROPERTY MGMT 4670 CARDINAL WAY STE 302 NAPLES, FL 34112---0 BLACK BEAR RIDGE PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION INC % CARDINAL PROPERTY MGMT 4670 CARDINAL WAY STE 302 NAPLES, FL 34112---0 BLACK BEAR RIDGE PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION INC % CARDINAL PROPERTY MGMT 4670 CARDINAL WAY STE 302 NAPLES, FL 34112---0 BLACK BEAR RIDGE PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION INC % CARDINAL PROPERTY MGMT 4670 CARDINAL WAY STE 302 NAPLES, FL 34112---0 BLACK BEAR RIDGE PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION INC % CARDINAL PROPERTY MGMT 4670 CARDINAL WAY STE 302 NAPLES, FL 34112---0 BLACK BEAR RIDGE PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION INC % CARDINAL PROPERTY MGMT 4670 CARDINAL WAY STE 302 NAPLES, FL 34112---1900 BLACK BEAR RIDGE PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION INC % CARDINAL PROPERTY MGMT 4670 CRDINAL WAY STE 302 NAPLES, FL 34112---0 BLACK BEAR RIDGE PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION INC %CARDINAL PROPERTY MGMT 4670 CARDINAL WAY STE 302 NAPLES, FL 34112---0 BNEI RIVKAH GROUP LLC 156 DUFFY AVENUE HICKSVILLE, NY 11801---0 BOTIE, PHILIP KERRY MINER 4 RYDER AVE DIX HILLS, NY 11746---6107 CARUS, CARLOS M & KAREM 7070 VENICE WAY #2903 NAPLES, FL 34119---0 COLLIER CNTY % OFC OF COLLIER CNTY ATTORNEY 3299 TAMIAMI TRL E HARMON TURNER BLDG 8TH FL NAPLES, FL 34112---0 COLLIER CNTY % OFFICE OF COUNTY ATTORNEY 3299 TAMIAMI TRL E STE 800 NAPLES, FL 34112---5749 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112---0 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112---0 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112---0 COLLIER COUNTY 3301 TAMIAMI TRAIL E NAPLES, FL 34112---0 CONTI FAMILY RES TRUST 20 NAUGHTON DRIVE RICHMOND HILL L4C 4M7 CUBERO, ROY 1504 BAY ROAD #2408 MIAMI BEACH, FL 33139---0 DORGAN, CHRISTOPHER P FABRIENA A DORGAN 7367 ACORN WAY NAPLES, FL 34119---9611 DORSEY, STEPHEN M SUSAN SERRA DORSEY 17 TIFFANY PL SARATOGA SPRINGS, NY 12866---9059 DUPRE, JAMES 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 EASTMAN TR, JULIE MAE 7050 AMBROSIA LN APT 3408 NAPLES, FL 34119---9630 EBICADO LLC 250 SUNNY ISLES BLVD BLDG 3 APT 1905 SUNNY ISLES, FL 33160---0 EDM INVESTMENT HOLDINGS LLC 3300 LAUREL OAK ST FT LAUDERDALE, FL 33312---6396 EDM INVESTMENT HOLDINGS LLC 3300 LAUREL OAK ST FT LAUDERDALE, FL 33312---6396 EDM INVESTMENT HOLDINGS LLC 3300 LAUREL OAK ST FT LAUDERDALE, FL 33312---6396 EDM INVESTMENT HOLDINGS LLC 3300 LAUREL OAK ST FT LAUDERDALE, FL 33312---6396 EMERITUS INVESTMENTS INC 2600 S DOUGLAS RD SUITE 510 CORAL GABLES, FL 33134---0 FALLS OF PORTOFINO MASTER HOA INC C/O ASSOC LAW GROUP P L 1200 BRICKELL AVENUE PH 2000 MIAMI, FL 33131---0 FLYNN LIVING TRUST 6209 WINNEQUAH RD MONONA, WI 53716---3461 FONTANA TR, BUDD & MARION BUDD & MARION FONTANA L/TRUST UTD 01/20/2011 4180 5TH AVE NW NAPLES, FL 34119---1500 FUCHS REVOCABLE TRUST 7351 ACORN WAY NAPLES, FL 34119---9611 GILMORE, BRUCE & CRISTINA 4281 7TH AVE NW NAPLES, FL 34119---0 GIMENEZ, TEODORO-& MILDRED 5530 RIDGE XING HANOVER PARK, IL 60133---5369 IGLESIAS, NARCISA 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 J & C L MAYNARD JT TRUST 7362 ACORN WAY NAPLES, FL 34119---0 J L PHIPPS D D S LOVING TRUST 521 ERIE CT BOWLING GREEN, OH 43402---2745 KEAGY, DOROTHY 7327 ACORN WAY NAPLES, FL 34119---0 KERRY A NICI GIFTING TRUST 1185 IMMOKALEE RD STE 110 NAPLES, FL 34110---4806 KUPEL, GEORGE W & MARIANNE K 7342 ACORN WAY NAPLES, FL 34119---0 LANG, ANN WEBER & TIMOTHY W 4161 7TH AVE NW NAPLES, FL 34119---1521 LOT 3 VANDERBILT COMMONS LLC % WELSH CO FL INC 2950 N TRAIL STE 200 NAPLES, FL 34103---0 MANOO, HAROLD 1187 OLD COLONY ROAD OAKVILLE L6M1J1 POList_500_PL20180003366 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 704 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) PL20180003366 500' 5/7/2019 Site: Vanderbilt Commons MPUD 2 MARTIN, ROBERT E MARY ELIZABETH ROGAN 7330 ACORN WAY NAPLES, FL 34119---0 MAUSEN, JOHN C ROBERT E MAUSEN 1086 FOREST LAKES DR #303 NAPLES, FL 34105---0 MAUSEN, ROBERT E & GEORGINA M 4355 7TH AVE NW NAPLES, FL 34119---1525 MCA PORTOFINO NAPLES LLC 5201 NW 77 AVENUE #400 MIAMI, FL 33166---0 MCA PORTOFINO NAPLES LLC 5201 NW 77 AVENUE #400 MIAMI, FL 33166---0 MCA PORTOFINO NAPLES LLC 5201 NW 77 AVENUE #400 MIAMI, FL 33166---0 MCA PORTOFINO NAPLES LLC 5201 NW 77 AVENUE #400 MIAMI, FL 33166---0 MCA PORTOFINO NAPLES LLC 5201 NW 77 AVENUE #400 MIAMI, FL 33166---0 MENDAX, SCOTT 7371 ACORN WAY NAPLES, FL 34119---9611 MISSION HILLS STATION LLC 11501 NORTHLAKE DRIVE CINCINNATI, OH 45249---0 NAZARIAN, CHRISTINE 7060 VENICE WAY APT 3104 NAPLES, FL 34119---9626 NISTOR, JOHN J & DIANE E 4331 7TH AVE NW NAPLES, FL 34119---1525 NORBERTO JR, FRANK & DENNINE 7326 ACORN WAY NAPLES, FL 34119---9610 NOSSEN ROBERT P & FRANCES 7335 ACORN WAY NAPLES, FL 34119---8091 NUNES, NORBERTO A 3345 27TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34117---7141 O'DONNELL, PAUL F 7358 ACORN WAY S NAPLES, FL 34119---0 OZBAY, EREN 5361 CHERRY WOOD DRIVE NAPLES, FL 34119---0 OZBAY, ERHAN 5361 CHERRY WOOD DRIVE NAPLES, FL 34119---0 PIAZZA, SALVATORE & ANNA G 3765 HELMSMAN DR NAPLES, FL 34120---0 POLLAK, LAURA E JEFFREY A PETRINITZ 7346 ACORN WAY NAPLES, FL 34119---0 POPE FAMILY TRUST 7350 ACORN WAY NAPLES, FL 34119---9610 PRD OWNER LLC % PROFESSIONAL RESOURCE DEV PO BOX 768 EFFINGHAM, IL 62401---0 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 POList_500_PL20180003366 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 705 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) PL20180003366 500' 5/7/2019 Site: Vanderbilt Commons MPUD 3 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 POList_500_PL20180003366 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 706 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) PL20180003366 500' 5/7/2019 Site: Vanderbilt Commons MPUD 4 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 PRIME HOMES AT PORTOFINO FALLS 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 R J FAY & J D FAY REV/L/TRUST 4191 7TH AVE NW NAPLES, FL 34119---1521 REFERENCE ONLY FALLS OF PORTOFINO CONDOMINIUM NO 1, THE REFERENCE ONLY FALLS OF PORTOFINO CONDOMINIUM NO 2, THE REFERENCE ONLY FALLS OF PORTOFINO CONDOMINIUM NO 5, THE REFERENCE ONLY FALLS OF PORTOFINO CONDOMINIUM NO 6, THE REYES, CRISTOBAL & LOYDA 110 9TH ST SW NAPLES, FL 34117---0 SCHMADER, JOHN F VIRGINIA M ELLIOTT 7323 ACORN WAY NAPLES, FL 34119---9625 SHALOM, YEHIEL SAR 4651 SHERIDAN ST STE 480 HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---3430 SUN, WEIYONG QIUYAN KONG 210 STOKES FARM RD FRANKLIN LAKES, NJ 07417---0 SUNCOAST SCHOOLS FED CR UNION ATTN: CINDY CURTIS 6801 E HILLSBOROUGH AVE TAMPA, FL 33610---4110 TABOR, DONALD J & AGNES H 4241 7TH AVE NW NAPLES, FL 34119---1523 TERIMAKI LLC 175 SW 7TH STREET STE 1611 MIAMI, FL 33130---0 THE FALLS OF PORTOFINO LAND TRUST I 1615 S CONGRESS AVENUE STE 200 DELRAY BEACH, FL 33435---0 UNIVERSAL PROPERTY LLC 175 SW 7 STREET STE 1611 MIAMI, FL 33130---0 UNIVERSAL PROPERTY LLC 175 SW 7 STREET STE 1611 MIAMI, FL 33130---0 UNIVERSAL PROPERTY LLC 175 SW 7TH STREET STE 1611 MIAMI, FL 33130---0 VANDERBILT COMMONS OWNERS' ASSOCIATION INC 2950 TAMIAMI TRL N #200 NAPLES, FL 34103---0 VANDERBILT COMMONS I TRUST 2950 TAMIAMI TRAIL N #200 NAPLES, FL 34103---0 VANDERBILT COMMONS OWNERS ASSN INC 2950 9TH STREET NORTH NAPLES, FL 34103---0 VANDERBILT COMMONS OWNERS ASSN INC 2950 9TH STREET NORTH NAPLES, FL 34103---0 VANDERBILT WAY APARTMENTS LLC 2950 TAMIAMI TRL N STE 200 NAPLES, FL 34103---0 VANDERBILT WAY APARTMENTS LLC 2950 TAMIAMI TRL N STE 200 NAPLES, FL 34103---0 VASSAR, ROBERT A & ANGELA C 7343 ACORN WAY NAPLES, FL 34119---9611 VIGILANTE, ANTHONY KATHLEEN WHITE-VIGILANTE 7319 ACORN WAY NAPLES, FL 34119---0 VIVAS, NEOMI FREDDY VIVAS JACOB AGAY 1669 DIPLOMAT DR MIAMI, FL 33179---6404 WEILAND, JAY H & JOAN M 7338 ACORN WAY NAPLES, FL 34119---9610 WILLIAMS, SEAN S & TARA LEE 7363 ACORN WAY NAPLES, FL 34119---9611 WITT, DAVID C & JOYCE E 7334 ACORN WAY NAPLES, FL 34119---9610 WOERZ, GARY F & ANNA G 7315 ACORN WAY NAPLES, FL 34119---0 POList_500_PL20180003366 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 707 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) Published DailyNaples, FL 34110 Affidavit of PublicationState of FloridaCounties of Collier and Lee Before the undersigned they serve as the authority, personally appeared Natalie Zollar who on oath says that she serves as Inside Sales Manager of the Naples Daily News, a daily newspaper published at Naples, in Collier County, Florida; distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida; that the attached copy of the advertising was published in said newspaper on dates listed. Affiant further says that the said Naples Daily News is a newspaper published at Na-ples, in said Collier County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Collier County, Florida; distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida, each day and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Naples, in said Collier County, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper.___________________________________________________________Customer Ad Number Copyline P.O.#_____________________________________________________________________________________ WALDROP ENGINEERING, P.A. 2281189 Neighborhood Meeting Pub DatesMay 17, 2019 _______________________________________(Signature of affiant) Sworn to and subscribed before meThis May 17, 2019 _______________________________________(Signature of affiant) 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 708 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 14A z FRIDAY, MAY 17, 2019 z NAPLES DAILY NEWS + NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING The public is invited to attend a neighborhood information meeting held by Wa ldrop Engineering,P.A.on behalf of Va nderbilt Wa y Apartments,LLC at the following time and location: Monday,June 3,2019,at 5:30 p.m. Greater Naples Fire Rescue District Headquarters 14575 Collier Blvd,Naples,FL 34119 Please be advised that Va nderbilt Way Apartments,LLC has filed two (2) concurrent applications (PL20180003366 &PL20180003372)with Collier County.These applications are seeking approval of:(1)a PUD amendment for the Va nderbilt Commons Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD)to remove the requirement to provide commercial uses on the first floor of the mixed-use building on Lots 5 and 6,and add one (1)deviation relating to building perimeter plantings;AND (2)a Growth Management Plan amendment (GMPA)to allow residential uses on the first floor of buildings on Lots 5 and 6.The GMPA does not request to increase density or intensity and no changes made affect any other portion of the MPUD. The existing MPUD consists of 14.49+/-acres and is generally located immediately north of Va nderbilt Beach Road,approximately ¼of a mile west of Collier Boulevard in unincorporated Collier County,Florida. WE VALUE YOUR INPUT Business and property owners and residents are welcome to attend the presentation and discuss the project with the owners’representatives and Collier County staff.If you are unable to attend this meeting,but have questions or comments,they can be directed to: Waldrop Engineering,P.A.c/o Lindsay Robin 28100 Bonita Grande Dr.,Suite 305,Bonita Springs,FL 34135 (239)405-7777,ext.2232 OR lindsay.robin@waldropengineering.com *Please note that Greater Naples Fire Rescue District does not sponsor or endorse this program. Summer Rate $38 Includes Green Fee and Cart Quail Run Golf Club 1 Forest Lakes Blvd Naples,FL 34105 239-261-3930 Call for Special Afternoon RatesCallforSpecialAfternoonRates Memberships AvailableMembershipsAvailable MEMB E R FOR A DAY! A HIDDEN JEWEL IN THE MIDDLE OF NAPLES! HindmanAuctions.com Compliment ar y Auction Estimates AMeissen Porcelain Pate sur Pate Four Piece Clock Garniture. Sold for 87,500. 8506th Avenue South Naples,Florida 34102 239.643.4448 naples@hindmanauctions.com hindmanauctions.com/naples SCHEDULE ACOMPLIMENTARY AUCTION ESTIMATE Hindmanspecialists in ourNaples of ficeare currentlyproviding complimentar yauction estimates foryourFineFurniture,Decorative Arts andSilver. Compliment ar y HAPPYHOUR $4 COCKTA ILS $6 APPETIZERS BAR 3PM -8PM 1DINNER PLUS 1GLASS OF WINE $14.99 10711 TA MIAMI TRL AC ROSS FROM TRADER JOE’S 239-260-1075ND-GCI0110434-01 SEAFOOD-STEAKS-PASTA Breakfast-Lunch-Dinner 643-2559 933 Airport Rd.S,Naples,FL 34104 3.5 blks.N.of Davis,1 blk S.of Naples Airport Open Sun 1-5pm •Mon.-Sat.10am-6pm all widths AAAA -EEEE custom fi tting by trained factory sales staff. We help consumers achieve pain-free walking by providing 5 star service, great selection,and superior quality comfort fashion footwear. NAOT,Mephisto,Ta ryn Rose,Helle Comfort,Wolky,Cole Haan, Thierry Rabotin,Beautifeel,Sperry,Ecco,Birkenstock,Florsheim, Finn Comfort,New Balance,SAS,Saucony,Asics,Sebago, Hushpuppy,Te va,Merrell,Fit Flop,Orthaheel,Acorn Slippers and many more... COUPONCOUPON www.shoewarehousenaples.com $25 OFF Must present Coupon at time of purchase. Not valid with any other offer. Expires 5/31/19 *Excludes SAS & Mephisto Kybun and Birkenstock Qual it y Co mfort and Service ND-GCI0177716-10 When Sergio Hostins moved from Maine to Saraso- ta in April of 2018, he planned to visit his aunt often. They talked on the phone every other day, and Hos- tins told Teresa Giani, 66, of West Palm Beach, he was looking forward to only being a few hours in the car away. However, Hostins, 55, was killed by a man he was having a relationship with — about six months after he moved to Florida. “Sergio was very friendly,” Giani said. “He liked to help friends and he helped his family a lot in Brazil. He worked here and all he thought about was his family back in Brazil.” Hostins moved to the U.S. as a child and worked at an Italian restaurant in Maine for 22 years. Then he accepted a job near Sarasota that was opening under the same ownership. “He used to do everything,” Giani said. “He would do plumbing, he was a good painter, he was a good waiter, he was a good electrician. He did it all at the restaurant.” Hostins often sent money to his mother and other family he left behind in Brazil , Giani said. “He was such a good person,” she said. “He was a very happy person, Sergio. He was al- ways making jokes.” On Tuesday, a jury found Daniel Da- venport, 31, of Sarasota, guilty of sec- ond-degree murder. Davenport killed Hostins in October 2018, stole his car and credit cards then dumped his carpet-wrapped body at a home in Naples Park, prosecutors said during the trial. The jury also found Davenport guilty of grand theft of a motor vehicle, 10 counts of fraudulent use of per- sonal identification information and unlawful posses- sion of four or fewer identities. Davenport was arrested in Orlando after eluding authorities for more than a week. He and Hostins met on a social media app for gay men, called Grindr, in September 2018 and developed a relationship. The last time Giani talked with her nephew it seemed like he knew he was in danger, she said. A few days before Hostins’ body was discovered at the home in the 700 block of 102nd Avenue North, he called Giani and asked for her address. Hostins told Giani he needed it so authorities would know to contact her in case something bad happened to him. Hostins was at the Department of Motor Vehicles and didn’t have time to explain what was going on. He told her he would call her back later, Giani said. “I gave the address to him, and those were the last words I heard from him,” Giani said. Hostins told a different family member he was fighting with his boyfriend, who kept asking him for money, Giani said. “What happened to Sergio with this guy, it was just for money,” Giani said. “He just wanted more and more money and then Sergio told him to get out because he needed money to pay his own bills.” It was hard for Giani to sit in the Sarasota courtroom for more than a week so close to her nephew’s killer, she said. “There was a lot, a lot of evidence,” Giani said. “They had so much evidence to prove he was guilty.” Twelfth Judicial Circuit Court Judge Stephen Walk- er deferred Davenport’s sentencing, pending a pre- sentence investigation. Everyone, from Hostins’ family to his boss loved him, Giani said. Homicide victim moved to Fla. shortly before his death Sergio Hostins is pictured inside the Italian restaurant he worked at near Sarasota. Hostins was killed about six months after he moved down to Florida from Maine.COURTESY OF TERESA GIANI Jake Allen Naples Daily News USA TODAY NETWORK - FLORIDA Davenport 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 709 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) VANDERBILT WAY COMMONS LOTS 5 & 6 PUDA CCPC PACKAGE PL20180003366 LIST OF REQUESTED DEVIATIONS & JUSTIFICATIONS 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 710 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) Vanderbilt Commons MPUD Deviation Narrative Page 1 of 1 JUSTIFICATIONS FOR REQUESTED DEVIATIONS FROM LDC VANDERBILT COMMONS MPUD REVISED JUNE 2019 Deviation No. 3: Deviation from LDC Section 4.06.05.C. “Building Foundation Planting Requirements”, which requires building foundation planting beds for building footprints over 10,000 square feet to be a minimum width of 10-feet, to allow the minimum width of the planting beds to be 8-feet. The Applicant will provide an additional five (5) solitaire palms planted with 10-foot clear trunk to supplement the area of foundation plantings and number of trees required by LDC section 4.06.05.C. This deviation shall only apply to Lots 5 and 6 of the MPUD. JUSTIFICATION: As shown on the PUD Master Plan, Lots 5 and 6 are proposed for residential-only buildings. Due to the design of the building, the Applicant is requesting a reduced building foundation planting width, specifically a reduction from 10-feet required for building footprints over 10,000 square feet, to 8-feet. The Applicant will provide an additional five (5) solitaire palms planted in accordance with LDC Section 4.06.05.D.2. to offset the minor reduction in width of plantable area. The Applicant respectfully submits that the five (5) additional solitaire palms will be located along the primary frontage street side of the building, upholding the intent of the requirement to screen the building with plantings. Please note the Applicant is not requesting relief from the requirements to provide perimeter buffers, or walls, along the parcel or MPUD boundaries, except where a previous deviation has already been approved. These required buffers are shown on the enclosed PUD master plan in accordance with the LDC. 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 711 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) VANDERBILT WAY COMMONS LOTS 5 & 6 PUDA CCPC PACKAGE PL20180003366 ORDINANCE 2017-47 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 712 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) ORDINANCE NO. 17 - 4 7 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 2005-19, THE CAROLINA VILLAGE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT BY CHANGING THE NAME OF THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT TO VANDERBILT COMMONS PUD; BY ADDING 50,000 SQUARE FEET OF GROSS LEASABLE AREA FOR A TOTAL OF 200,000 SQUARE FEET OF GROSS LEASABLE AREA FOR COMMERCIAL USES; BY DECREASING THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS FROM 64 TO 58 DWELLING UNITS; BY REVISING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND REDUCING THE ACREAGE OF THE PUD FROM 15.88 ACRES TO 14.49 ACRES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY, CONSISTING OF 15.8+/- ACRES, IS LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD AND APPROXIMATELY 1/4 MILE EAST OF COLLIER BOULEVARD IN SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA. IPUDA-PL201500021661 WHEREAS, on April 26, 2005, the Board of County Commissioners approved Ordinance No. 2005-19, which established the Carolina Village Planned Unit Development (PUD); and WHEREAS, Frederick Hood, AICP of Davidson Engineering, Inc. representing Vanderbilt Commons, LLC, petitioned the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, to amend Ordinance 2005-19, the Carolina Village PUD, as amended. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA that: SECTION ONE: Amendments to the PUD Document attached as Exhibit A to Ordinance Number 2005-19, formerly the Carolina Village Planned Unit Development. The PUD Document attached as Exhibit A to Ordinance Number 2005-19, formerly the Carolina Village Planned Unit Development, is hereby amended and replaced with the PUD Document attached hereto as Exhibit A. 16-CPS-01577/1375824/1]243 Page 1 of 2 Vanderbilt Commons/PUDA-PL20150002166 11/3/17 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 713 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) SECTION TWO: Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State and on the date that the Growth Management Plan Amendment in Ordinance No. 2017- ={'3 becomes effective. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by super-majority vote of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this I , day of C e 1 b; 2017. 1,0 ,'ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK COLLI 'NTY, FLORIDA By: Attest as to Qbapaurtslerk PE Or AYLOR ,irman tj k signature only. Approved as to form and legality: 4 N A H idi Ashto LL1 1 Managing Assistant County Attorney Attachment: Exhibit A—PUD Document (including Revised Master Plan) This ordinance filed with the Secretary of State's Office 1 1§t"day of ,e-nkk;"--- _" and 1Sof thatd+`` filing received this _----ay afD Byr Deputy , 1`" 16-CPS-01577/1375824/1]243 Page 2 of 2 Vanderbilt Commons/PUDA-PL20150002166 11/3/17 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 714 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) VANDERBILT COMMONS A MIXED USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS AND SUPPORTING MASTER PLAN GOVERNING THE CAROLINA VILLAGE VANDERBILT COMMONS MIXED USE PUD, A MIXED USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PURSUANT TO PROVISIONS OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE. PREPARED FOR: WILLIAM L. HOOVER CATALINA PLAZA, LLC 3785 AIRPORT ROAD N., SUITE 8 1 NAPLES, FLORIDA 34105 VANDERBILT COMMONS, LLC 2950 TAMIAMI TRAIL NORTH NAPLES, FL 34103 GEORGE VUKOBRATOVICH AS SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE OF THE VANDERBILT COMMONS I LAND TRUST DATED 8/1/16 C/O WELSH COMPANIES FL, INC. 2950 TAMIAMI TRAIL NORTH, SUITE 200 NAPLES, FL 34103 MIDGARD SELF-STORAGE NAPLES, LLC 1905 WOODSTOCK RD, BUILDING #900, SUITE #9100 ROSWELL, GA 30075 VANDERBILT COMMONS OWNER'S ASSOCIATION, INC. C/O WELSH COMPANIES FL, INC. 2950 TAMIAMI TRAIL NORTH, SUITE 200 NAPLES, FL 34103 PREPARED BY: RICHARD D. YOVANOVICH GOODLETTE, COLEMAN &JOHNSON, P.A. 1001 N. TAMIAMI TRAIL, SUITE 300 NAPLES, FLORIDA 34103 and Vanderbilt Commons MPUD PUDA-PL20150002166 November 2, 2017 Words added are underlined and words-struck through have been deleted Exhibit A 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 715 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) NORMAN J. TREBILCOCK, P.E., AICP Q. GRADY MINOR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 3800 VIA DEL REY BONITA SPRINGS, FLORIDA 34134 and 1 1 _ /11111 ? HOOVER PLANNING & DEV., INC. 3785 AIRPORT ROAD N., SUITE B 1 NAPLES, FLORIDA 31105 FREDERICK E. HOOD, AICP DAVIDSON ENGINEERING 4365 RADIO ROAD, SUITE 201 NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 and R. BRUCE ANDERSON CHEFFY PASSIDOMO, P.A. 821 5TH AVENUE SOUTH NAPLES, FLORIDA 34102 DATE FILED August 9, 2004 DATE REVISED April 9, 2005, October 6, 2017 DATE REVIEWED BY CCPC April 7, 2005, October 5, 2017 DATE APPROVED BCC April 26, 2005, December 12, 2017 ORDINANCE NUMBER 2005-19 AMENDMENTS AND REPEAL Vanderbilt Commons MPUD PUDA-PL20150002166 November 2, 2017 Words added are underlined and words struck through have been deleted 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 716 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE LIST OF EXHIBITS AND TABLES iii STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE 1 SECTION I PROPERTY OWNERSHIP AND DESCRIPTION 3 SECTION II PROJECT DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS 5.6 SECTION III MIXED USE AREA PLAN g9 SECTION IV PRESERVE AREA PLAN 4-417 SECTION V DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS 1518 Vanderbilt Commons MPUD PUDA-PL20150002166 November 2, 2017 Words added are underlined and words struck through have been deleted ii 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 717 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) LIST OF EXHIBITS AND TABLES EXHIBIT"A" PUD MASTER PLAN/UTILITIES/WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN EXHIBIT"B" CROSS SECTIONS FOR PUD MASTER PLAN EXHIBIT"C" CAROLINA VILLAGE VANDERBILT COMMONS LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT"D" LOCATION MAP EXHIBIT"E" BOUNDARY SURVEY TABLE I DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Vanderbilt Commons MPUD PUDA-PL20150002166 November 2, 2017 Words added are underlined and words struck through have been deleted iii 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 718 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE The development of approximately 15.88 ±14.49 acres of property in Collier County, as a Mixed Use Planned Unit Development to be known as Carolina Villagc Vanderbilt Commons Mixed Use PUD will be in compliance with the planning goals and objectives of Collier County as set forth in the Collier County Growth Management Plan. The commercial and residential facilities of the Carolina Village Vanderbilt Commons Mixed Use PUD will be consistent with the growth policies, land development regulations, and applicable comprehensive planning objectives for the following reasons: 1. The subject property is within the 14.49-Acre Expansion Area of the Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict land use designation,as identified on the Future Land Use Map-and as described in the Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Boulevard Commercial Sub-District of the Urban -Mixed Use District in the Future Land Use Element. The Future Land Use Element permits commercial and residential land uses in this area and this Mixed-Use PUD complies with both the commercial and residential development standards within the Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict Expansion Area. 2. The subject property's location in relation to existing or proposed community facilities and services permits the development's commercial intensity as described in Objective 2 of the Future Land Use Element. 3. The project development is compatible and complimentary to surrounding land uses as required in Policy 5.4 of the Future Land Use Element. 4. Improvements are planned to be in compliance with applicable sections of the Collier County Land Development Code as set forth in Objective 3 of the Future Land Use Element. 5. The project development will result in an efficient and economical allocation of community facilities and services as required in Policy 3.1.G of the Future Land Use Element. 6. The project development is planned to protect the functioning of natural drainage features and natural groundwater aquifer recharge areas as described in Objective 1.5 of the Drainage Sub-Element of the Public Facilities Element. 7. The project is located within the Urban Mixed Use District 14.49 - Acre Expansion Area of the, Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict, on the Future Land Use Map. The 64 58 proposed units over commercial uses and resultant density of 4.03 dwelling units per acre is in compliance with the Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan based on the following relationships to required criteria: Vanderbilt Commons MPUD PUDA-PL20150002166 November 2, 2017 Words added are underlined and words struck through have been deleted 1 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 719 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 15.88 Acres for a Mixcd Use Prefect Wit-la residential Uses Over Commercial Uses Within the Vanderbilt Bccach/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict Maximum Permitted Density 16 dwelling units/acre Maximum permitted units, per the Density Rating System of the Collier County Growth Management Plan = 15.88 acres (Expansion Area acreage) 14.49 acres x 16 dwelling units/acre = 251 231 as the maximum number of dwelling units at a maximum density of 46,99 15.94 dwelling units/acre. Requested Maximum Approved dwelling units=64 58. Requested density=4.03 dwelling units/acre. 8. All final local development orders for this project are subject to Division 6.02, Adequate Public Facilities Requirements. of the Collier County Land Development Code. Vanderbilt Commons MPUD PUDA-PL20150002166 November 2, 2017 Words added are underlined and words struck through have been deleted 2 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 720 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) SECTION PROPERTY OWNERSHIP AND DESCRIPTION 1.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to set forth the location and ownership of the property, and to describe the existing conditions of the property proposed to be developed under the project name of Carolina Village Vanderbilt Commons Mixed Use PUD. 1.2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION The subject property being 15.88±14.49 acres, is located in Section 34,Township 48 South,Range 26 East, and is fully described on Exhibit "C". 1.3 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP The subject property is owned by: The Vanderbilt Beach Road Land Trust, c/o Mark L. Lindner, Trustee, Naples Realty Services, 1980 N.Tamiami Trail, 2nd Floor, Naples, Florida 34103. The subject property is under purchase contract by: William L. Hoover, President of Catalina Land Group, Inc., as the Manager of Catalina Plaza, LLC, 3785 Airport Road North, Suite B 1, Naples, Florida 34105. Vanderbilt Commons, LLC 2950 Tamiami Trail North Naples, FL 34103 George Vukobratovich, as Successor Trustee of the Vanderbilt Commons I Land Trust dated 8/1/16 c/o Welsh Companies FL, Inc. 2950 Tamiami Trail North,Suite 200 Naples, FL 34103 Midgard Self-Storage Naples, LLC 1905 Woodstock Rd, Building#900, Suite#9100 Roswell, GA 30075 Vanderbilt Commons Owner's Association, Inc. c/o Welsh Companies FL, Inc. 2950 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 200 Naples, FL 34103 Vanderbilt Commons MPUD PUDA-PL20150002166 November 2, 2017 Words added are underlined and words struck through have been deleted 3 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 721 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 1.4 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY AREA A. The subject property is located on the north side of Vanderbilt Beach Road approximately one-quarter mile west of Collier Boulevard (unincorporated Collier County), Florida. B. The zoning classification of the subject property prior to the date of this approved Mixed Use PUD Document was Rural Agricultural. 1.5 PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION The Project site is located within the Harvey Drainage Basin, according to the Collier County Drainage Atlas.The proposed outfall for the Project is to the Vanderbilt Canal. Natural ground elevation varies from 12.3 to 13.2 NGVO; average site elevation is about 12.6 NGVO. The entire site is located within FEMA Flood Zone "X" with no base flood elevation specified. The water management system of the Project will include the construction of a perimeter berm with crest elevation set at or above the 25-year. 3-day peak flood stage. Water quality pretreatment will be accomplished by an on-site lake system prior to discharge south into the Vanderbilt Canal or discharge north into the Black Bear Ridge Subdivision water management system and eventual southerly discharge into the Vanderbilt Canal. The water management system will be permitted by the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) through the Environmental Resource Permit process. All rules and regulations of SFWMD will be imposed upon this Project including, but not limited to:storm attenuation with a peak discharge rate per Collier County and SFWMD Rules, minimum roadway centerline, perimeter berm and finished floor elevations, water quality pre-treatment. and wetland hydrology maintenance. Per the Natural Resource Conservation Service Soils Mapping for Collier County dated January 1990, the soil type found within the limits of the property is #2 - Holopaw Fine Sand. Limestone Substratum. Site vegetation consists predominantly of improved pasture grasses, except a narrow strip of native vegetation along the north property line which is pine cypress-cabbage palm forest. Vanderbilt Commons MPUD PUDA-PL20150002166 November 2,2017 Words added are underlined and words,truck through have been deleted 4 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 722 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 1.6 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Carolina Village Vanderbilt Commons Mixed Use PUD is a project comprised of 15.88±14.49 acres designated for commercial and residential land uses and the commercial uses are limited to a maximum of 150000 200,000 square feet of gross leasable area and the residential land uses are limited to a maximum of€458 dwelling units. The remainder of the square footage may for retail and office land uses and all residential dwelling units shall be located in mixed-use buildings with commercial uses situated on at least the first floor.Commercial and residential land uses and signage are designed to be harmonious with one another in a natural setting by using common architecture, quality screening/buffering. and native vegetation,whenever feasible. 1.7 SHORT TITLE This Ordinance shall be known and cited as the "Carolina Village Mixed Use Planned Unit Development Ordinance" "Vanderbilt Commons Mixed Use Planned Unit Development Ordinance". Vanderbilt Commons MPUD PUDA-PL20150002166 November 2, 2017 Words added are underlined and words struck through have been deleted 5 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 723 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) SECTION II PROJECT DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS 2.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to delineate and generally describe the project plan of development, relationships to applicable County ordinances, the respective land uses of the tracts included in the project,as well as other project relationships. 2.2 GENERAL A. Regulations for development of the Carolina Villagc Vanderbilt Commons Mixed Use PUD shall be in accordance with the contents of this document, MPUD - Mixed Use Planned Unit Development District and other applicable sections and parts of the Collier County Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan in effect at the time of building permit application. Where these regulations fail to provide developmental standards, then the provisions of the most similar district in the Land Development Code shall apply. B. Unless otherwise noted, the definitions of all terms shall be the same as the definitions set forth in the Collier County Land Development Code in effect at the time of building permit application. C. All conditions imposed and graphic material presented depicting restrictions for the development of the Carolina Village Vanderbilt Commons Mixed Use PUD shall become part of the regulations,which govern the manner in which the MPUD site may be developed. D. Unless modified,waived or excepted by this MPUD the provisions of other land development codes where applicable remain in full force and effect with respect to the development of the land which comprises this MPUD. E. Development permitted by the approval of this petition will be subject to a concurrency review under the provisions of Division 6.02 Adequate Public Facilities Requirements of the Collier County Land Development Code at the earliest, or next, to occur of either Final Site Development Plan approval, Final Plat approval,or building permit issuance applicable to this development. 2.3 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT DENSITY OR INTENSITY OF LAND USES A. Commercial uses are limited to 15.88 14.49 acres with a maximum of 150,000 200,000 square feet of gross leasable area_ Rfesidential uses are limited to a maximum of 6458 dwelling units and must be located on the second and/or third floors of mixed use buildings with commercial uses on at least the first floor. Carolina Village Vanderbilt Commons Mixed Use PUD is intended to create a pedestrian-friendly atmosphere that encourages area residents to work and shop there and on-site workers to walk to other services, such as having lunch within the project. Vanderbilt Commons MPUD PUDA-PL20150002166 November 2, 2017 Words added are underlined and words,truck through have been deleted 6 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 724 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) The maximum of 64 58 residential units will not exceed a density of 4.03 units/per acre. The project is shown as 2 tracts, a "North Tract" located north of Carolina Way (the east-west roadway splitting the site) and a "South Tract" located south of Carolina Way. The South Tract is expected to be more retail-oriented with a sit-down restaurant,a bank,and a few residential uses. The North Tract is expected to be more office and service-oriented. The North Tract will likely have both medical and professional offices and some residential uses. 2.4 RELATED PROJECT PLAN APPROVAL REQUIREMENTS A. Prior to the recording of a Record Plat, and/or Condominium Plat for all or part of the MPUD, final plans of all required improvements shall receive approval of the appropriate Collier County governmental agency to insure compliance with the PUD Master Plan, the Collier County Subdivision Code and the platting laws of the State of Florida. B. Exhibit "A", PUD Master Plan, constitutes the required PUD Development Plan. Subsequent to or concurrent with PUD approval, a Preliminary Subdivision Plat if applicable shall be submitted for the entire area covered by the PUD Master Plan. Any division of the property and the development of the land shall be in compliance with the PUD Master Plan, Division 4.03 Subdivision Design and Layout of the Land Development Code, and the platting laws of the State of Florida. C. The provisions of Section 10.02.03, Site Development Plans of the Land Development Code, when applicable, shall apply to the development of all platted tracts, or parcels of land as provided in said Section 10.02.03 prior to the issuance of a building permit or other development order. D. Appropriate instruments will be provided at the time of infrastructural improvements regarding any dedications to Collier County and the methodology for providing perpetual maintenance of common facilities. 2.5 SALES/RENTAL/CONSTRUCTION FACILITIES Temporary sales/rental trailers and construction trailers can be placed on the site after Site Development Plan approval and prior to the recording of Subdivision Plats, subject to the other requirements of Section 5.04.04 of the Land Development Code. 2.6 AMENDMENTS TO PUD DOCUMENT OR PUD MASTER PLAN Amendments may be made to the PUD as provided in the Collier County Land Development Code. Section 10.02.13E. Vanderbilt Commons MPUD PUDA-PL20150002166 November 2, 2017 Words added are underlined and words struck through have been deleted 7 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 725 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 2.7 PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION FOR COMMON AREA MAINTENANCE Whenever the developer elects to create land area and/or amenities whose ownership and maintenance responsibility is a common interest to all of the subsequent purchasers of property within said development in which the common interest is located, that developer entity shall provide appropriate legal instruments for the establishment of a Property Owners Association whose function shall include provisions for the perpetual care and maintenance of all common facilities and open space. Vanderbilt Commons MPUD PUDA-PL20150002166 November 2,2017 Words added are underlined and words;truck through have been deleted 8 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 726 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) SECTION III MIXED USE AREA PLAN 3.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to identify specific development standards for the Mixed-Use Areas as shown on Exhibit "A", PUD Master Plan. 3.2 GENERAL DESCRIPTION Areas designated as Mixed Use Areas on the PUD Master Plan are intended to provide a variety of retail uses and office uses,while providing for the opportunity of having residential uses on the second and/or third floor of mixed use buildings,that have commercial uses on at least the first floor.Commercial Areas are limited to a maximum gross leasable area of 150,000 200,000 square feet and residential uses are limited to a maximum of 6458 dwelling units. 3.3 PERMITTED USES No building, structure or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used,or land used, in whole or part. for other than the following: A. Permitted Commercial Principal Uses and Structures: 1. Amusement and Recreation Services (groups SIC 7911, except dance halls and discotheques, 7922, 7991, 7993 only for indoor video game arcade and indoor coin operated amusement machine. 7999 only for bicycle rental, ice skating rink operation, gymnastics instruction, judo instruction, karate instruction and yoga instruction). 2. Apparel and Accessory Stores(groups SIC 5611—5699 except thrift and or surplus stores). parts dealers, limited to retail sales without any installation). 4. Automobile Parking(group 7521). 63. Paint, Glass, and Wallpaper Stores (group SIC 5231). 64. Business Services (groups SIC 7311, 7313,7323, 7331 —7338, 7361, 7371 — 7379, 7384, 7389 only for service of interior decorating/design, mapmaking, notary public, paralegal service, and Postal Service contract stations). 75. Depository and Non-Depository Institutions (groups SIC 6021-6396091). Vanderbilt Commons MPUD PUDA-PL20150002166 November 2, 2017 Words added are underlined and words struck through have been deleted 9 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 727 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 86. Eating Places (group SIC 5812) and Drinking Places (group SIC 5813 only cocktail lounges and on-premise consumption of beer,wine and liquor, in conjunction with a restaurant.) No freestanding food stands and or kiosks are permitted. Drinking Places are subject to the locational restrictions described in Section 2.6.10 5.05.01 of the Land Development Code. a. Lots 5 & 6 (as shown on the Vanderbilt Commons Subdivision Plat, recorded in Plat Book 60, Page 31 of the Public Records of Collier County) shall have the following limitations: i. No outdoor seating shall be permitted; ii. The hours of operation for any eating place shall be limited to 6 a.m.—4 p.m.; iii. Loading and deliveries shall be from the front entrance only; and iv. The consumption of alcohol is not permitted on these Lots. 97. Educational Services (groups SIC 8211 — 848222, 8243 — 8249, 8299 {r}e—regional li aries). 408. Food Stores with 5,000 square feet or less of gross floor area in the principal structure groups SIC 5411—5499). 449. General Merchandise Stores with 5,000 square feet or less of gross floor area in the principal structure (groups SIC 5311 and 5399 except variety stores: single-price point discount, surplus,overstock or liquidation outlets). 10. Hardware stores with 10,000 square feet or less of gross floor area in the principal structure (SIC 5251). 411. Health Services (groups SIC 8011—8049, 8082). 4-812. Home Furniture, Furnishings and Equipment Stores (groups SIC 5712-5736). 4413. Insurance Carriers, Agents, Brokers, and Services with 5,000 square feet or less of gross floor area in the principal structure (groups SIC 6311—6399, 6411). 4514. Legal Services (group SIC 8111). 4615. Membership Organizations (groups SIC 8611, 8621,8644-8661 only for offices related to religious organizations). 4-716. Miscellaneous Repair(groups SIC 7622, 7629, 7631, 7699 kg only bicycle repair, camera repair, locksmiths, luggage repair, medical/dental instrument repair, musical instrument repair, piano repair, saw/knife sharpening service, and custom picture framing). 4817. Miscellaneous Retail (groups SIC 5912, 5921, 5932 {antiques only-p, 5941 — 5949, 5961, 6964, 5992, 5994—5999 (except auction rooms, awning shops, fireworks, flea markets, gravestones, hot tubs, monuments, pawn shops, sales barns, swimming pools, Vanderbilt Commons MPUD PUDA-PL20150002166 November 2,2017 Words added are underlined and words struck through have been deleted 10 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 728 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) tombstones and whirlpool baths).{The sale of swimming pool accessories and supplies is allowable under SIC 5999 but not the sale of swimming pools4. 19. Motion Picture Th aters and Video Tape Rental (groups 7832 7811). 29:18. Museums and Art Galleries (gip SIC 8412). 2-119. Personal Services (group SIC 7212 only dry-cleaning and laundry drop off and pickup stations ery, 7221 — 7251, 7291, 7299 (only car title and tag service, diet workshops, tuxedo rental,massage parlor, and tanning salon). 2220. Professional Offices, Research, and Management Consulting Services (groups SIC 8711- 8743, 8748). 2321. Public Administration (groups SIC 9111 9199, 9229, 9311, 9411 9151 and 9431, 9511 9532, 9611—9661,9221). 2422. Real Estate Agents and Managers (groups SIC 6512, 6531—6552). 2623. Security and Commodity Dealers (groups SIC 6211—6289). 2-624. Social Services (gip SIC 8322 only adult day care services, counseling services, and senior citizens associations, 8351). 2-725. Travel Agencies (group SIC 4724). 2826. Any other use which is comparable and compatible in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal and the accessory uses, as prescribed by the LDC, shall be heard by the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA). Prior to the approval of any uses, the applicant shall provide public notice in addition to an advertisement for the hearing which shall include a neighborhood information meeting, mailings and signage in the same manner as that required for substantial amendments to a Planned Unit Development. B. Permitted Residential Principal Uses and Structures: 1. Multi-Family dwellings. 2. Any other use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal and the accessory uses by the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA). C. Accessory Commercial Uses: 1. Uses and structures that are accessory and incidental to the Permitted Uses within this PUD Document. 2. Drinking Places (group 5813 only cocktail lounges and on premise consumption of beer, wine, and liquor in conjunction with a restaurant). Vanderbilt Commons MPUD PUDA-PL20150002166 November 2, 2017 Words added are underlined and words struck through have been deleted 11 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 729 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 32. Caretaker's residences subject to Section 5.03.05 of the Collier County Land Development Code. D. Accessory Residential Uses: 1. Customary residential accessory uses and structures including carports, garages, and storage buildings. 2. Recreational. uses and facilities including swimming pools, hot tubs, volleyball courts, children's playground areas, tot lots, walking paths, picnic areas, clubhouse, verandahs, and basketball/shuffle board courts. 3. Manager's residences and offices, temporary sales trailers, and model units. 4. Gatehouse. 5. Essential services, including interim and permanent utility and maintenance facilities. 6. Carports are permitted within parking areas. Vanderbilt Commons MPUD PUDA-PL20150002166 November 2, 2017 Words added are underlined and words struck through have been deleted 12 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 730 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 3.4 PROHIBITED USES 1. Auto stores (SIC 5531, tire dealers, and tire, battery, and accessory dealers— retail, and auto supply stores with service bays, lifts or other facilities for installing such automotive parts). 2. Gasoline service stations, and other facilities with fuel pumps (SIC 5541). 3. Fast food restaurants with drive-through lanes. 4. Any freestanding donation boxes/kiosks. 5. Outdoor amplified sound devices,televisions or live entertainment,with the exception for approved temporary use/event permits as outlined in LDC Section 5.04.01. 6. Adult entertainment and sexually oriented businesses 7. Lots 5&6(as shown on the Vanderbilt Commons Subdivision Plat, recorded in Plat Book 60, Page 31 of the Public Records of Collier County)shall not provide main public access entryways along the northern facades of any proposed building. 3.45 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS A. Table I sets forth the development standards for land uses within the Carolina Village Vanderbilt Commons Mixed Use PUD. Front yard setbacks in Table I shall be measured as follows: 1. If the parcel is served by a public or private right-of-way, the setback is measured from the adjacent right-of-way line. 2. If the parcel is served by a non-platted private drive,the setback is measured from the back of curb or edge of pavement. If the parcel is served by a platted private drive,the setback is measured from the road easement or property line. Vanderbilt Commons MPUD PUDA-PL20150002166 November 2,2017 Words added are underlined and words struck through have been deleted 13 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 731 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) TABLE I MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS The table below sets forth the development standards for land uses within the Vanderbilt Commons MPUD. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or subdivision plat. COMMERCIAL USES RESIDENTIAL USES Minimum Lot Area 10,000 Sq Ft. square feet SCU on First Floor10,000 square feet Minimum Lot Width 751 feet(1) SCU on First Floor 75 feet(1) Front Yard Setback 201 feet SCU on First Floor 20 feet Side Yard Setback(2) 1-Story 61 feet SCU on First Floor 6 feet 2-Story 7.5-feet SCU on First Floor 7.5 feet 3-Story 10-feet SCU on First Floor 10 feet Rear Yard Setback Principal Structure 151 feet SCU on First Floor 15 feet Accessory Structure 101feet 101feet PUD Boundary Setback Principal Structure BH BH Accessory Structure 101 feet or buffer width 101 feet or buffer width Lake Setback(3) 201 feet or 0'feet 201 feet or 0'feet Preserve Area Setback Principal Structure 251feet 251feet Accessory Structures or 10 feet Other Site Alterations 10'feet Distance Between Structures Main/Principal 1-Story to 1-Story 121 feet 4i 13.5 feet 1-Story to 2-Story 13.51 feet 13.5' 15 feet 2-Story to 2-Story 151 feet 455'-17.5 feet 2-Story to 3-Story 17.51 feet 17.5' 20 feet 3-Story to 3-Story 201 feet 201 12 feet Accessory Structures Same as principal structure Same as principal structure Maximum Height(4) Retail Building 35 feet and 1-story N/A Office Building 42 feet and 3-stories N/A Accessory Building 35 feet 35'feet Mixed-Use Building(4) 451 feet and 3-stories 45-feet and 3-stories 700 square feet of principal 580700 square feet per dwelling unit Minimum Floor Area structure on first habitable floor Vanderbilt Commons MPUD PUDA-PL20150002166 November 2, 2017 Words added are underlined and words struck through have been deleted 14 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 732 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 1) May be reduced on cul-de-sac lots and lots along the inside and outside of curved streets by 25%. 2)Where fee simple lots are created for each building unit no side yard shall be required between interior units of a unified principal structure. and the side yard shall be measured from the exterior wall(s)of the unified principal structure. 3) Lake setbacks are measured from the control elevation established for the lake. Lake setbacks can be reduced from 20'to 0'where a stemwall bulkhead or pier is constructed and the requirements of Section 4.02 05 of the LDC are met. 4) Retail uses are limited to the first floor of any building residential uses are limited to the second and third floors of mixed-use buildings (structures with retail or office uses on the first floor and office or residential uses on the second and third floors) Note 'BH" refers to building height_and "SCU" refers to same as thc commercial use on thc first floor of the mixed use building the residential use is located in. B. Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements: As required by Division 4.05 Off-Street Parking and Loading of the Land Development Code in effect at the time of building permit application. Off-site parking is permitted where a shared parking facility is located within 300 feet of the building requiring such parking. C.Buffering Requirements: 1. A minimum twenty(20)foot wide Type "D" Buffer shall be provided along Vanderbilt Beach Road, with the landscaping as required in Section 4.06.02 of the Collier County Land Development Code. D. Commercial Design Standards The project shall meet the commercial design standards within Division 5.05.08 of the Collier County Land Development Code. Vanderbilt Commons MPUD PUDA-PL20150002166 November 2, 2017 Words added are underlined and words struck through have been deleted 15 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 733 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) E.Deviations 1. Deviation from Land Development Code(LDC)Section 5.06.04.G 5.06.01A.6.a. c.,in order to to allow one double-faced off-premises sign with a maximum of 8 feet in height and 32 64 square feet in area, located in the road right-of-way e . •. -- Carolina Village (labeled Pristine Drive on Exhibit "A") and on the west side of the Carolina Village advertising.The sign will be limited exclusively to no more than 3 residential developments within the abutting Wolf Creek PUD. The proposed sign must meet all vehicular safety sight distance standards for Collier County and have a minimum 10-foot setback from the Vanderbilt Beach Road right-of-way, as described in Section 5.06.04A.6.a. of the LDC. The proposed sign must be externally illuminated only. lighted and not internally lighted. This having the sign looking out of balance if it were located solely on the western half of the median in the road, and also minimizes confusion for visitors and deliveries to the 3 residential projects. Once Pristine Drive is accepted by the Board of County Commissioners as a public road, any structural changes to the sign shall require a right-of-way permit. The signage shall be perpetually maintained by the homeowner's associations of the developments named on the sign. The County at any time after the road becomes public may require the sign to be relocated for road expansion or to address capacity or safety issues. Vanderbilt Commons MPUD P U DA-PL20150002166 November 2, 2017 Words added are underlined and words struck through have been deleted 16 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 734 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) SECTION IV PRESERVE AREA PLAN 4.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to identify specific development standards for the Preserve Areas as shown on Exhibit "A," PUD Master Plan, as may be amended pursuant to Section 5.3. 4.2 PERMITIED USES No building, structure or part thereof,shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or part,for other than the following: A. Permitted Principal Uses and Structures: 1. Passive recreational areas. 2. Biking, hiking, and nature trails, and boardwalks. 3. Water management structures. 3. Native preserves and wildlife sanctuaries. Vanderbilt Commons MPUD PUDA-PL20150002166 November 2,2017 Words added are underlined and words struck through have been deleted 17 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 735 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) SECTION V DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS 5.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to set forth the commitments for the development of this project. 5.2 GENERAL A. All facilities shall be constructed in strict accordance with Final Site Development Plans, Final Subdivision Plans and all applicable State and local laws, codes, and regulations applicable to this MPUD, in effect at the time of building permit application. B. Except where specifically noted or stated otherwise, the standards and specifications of the Collier County Land Development Code shall apply to this project even if the land within the MPUD is not to be platted. The developer, his successor and assigns, shall be responsible for the commitments outlined in this document. C. The developer, his successor or assignee,shall follow the PUD Master Plan and the regulations of this MPUD as adopted and any other conditions or modifications as may be agreed to in the rezoning of the property. In addition, any successor in title or assignee is subject to the commitments within this Agreement. 5.3 PUD MASTER PLAN A. Exhibit "A", PUD Master Plan illustrates the proposed development and is conceptual in nature. Proposed tract, lot or land use boundaries or special land use boundaries shall not be construed to be final and may be varied at any subsequent approval phase such as Final Platting or Site Development Plan approval. Subject to the provisions of Section 10.02.13E. of the Collier County Land Development Code, amendments may be made from time to time. B. All necessary easements, dedications, or other instruments shall be granted to insure the continued operation and maintenance of all service utilities and all common areas in the project. Vanderbilt Commons MPUD PUDA-PL20150002166 November 2, 2017 Words added are underlined and words struck through have been deleted 18 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 736 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 5.4 SCHEDULE OF DEVELOPMENT/MONITORING REPORT submittal.The project is expected to be completed in one(1)or two (2) phases. The landowners shall proceed and be governed according to the time limits pursuant to Section 10.02.13D. of the Land Development Code. The third anniversary date of this MPUD traffictraffic lanes arc open to traffic) of the 6 laning projects on both Collier Boulevard, between Boulevard and Collier Boulevard. One entity (hereinafter the Managing Entity) shall be responsible for PUD monitoring until close-out of the PUD, and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUD commitments until close-out of the PUD. At the time of this PUD approval, the Managing Entity is The Vanderbilt Commons Owner's Association, Inc. Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity,then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document that needs to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. After such approval,the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity.As Owner and Developer sell off tracts,the Managing Entity shall provide written notice to County that includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required by the PUD by the new owner and the new owner's agreement to comply with the Commitments through the Managing Entity, but the Managing Entity shall not be relieved of its responsibility under this Section. When the PUD is closed-out, then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment of PUD commitments. l3. Monitoring Report: An annual monitoring report shall be submitted pursuant to Section 10.02.13F. of the Collier County Land Development Code. 5.5 ENGINEERING A. This project shall be required to meet all County Ordinances in effect at the time final construction documents are submitted for development approval. B. Design and construction of all improvements shall be subject to compliance with appropriate provisions of the Collier County Land Development Code, Division 4.03 Subdivision Design and Layout. Vanderbilt Commons MPUD PUDA-PL20150002166 November 2, 2017 Words added are underlined and words struck througn have been deleted 19 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 737 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 5.6 WATER MANAGEMENT A. A copy of the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) Surface Water Permit Application shall be sent to Collier County Development Services with the SDP submittal. B. A copy of the SFWMD Surface Water Permit, SFWMD Right-of-Way Permit, and SFWMD Discharge Permit shall be submitted prior to Final Site Development Plan Approval. C. An Excavation Permit will be required for any proposed lake(s) in accordance with Collier County and SFWMD rules. D. Lake setbacks from the perimeter of the MPUD may be reduced to twenty-five(25)feet where a six (6)foot high fence or suitable substantial barrier is erected. 5.7 UTILITIES A: Water distribution, sewage collection and transmission and interim water and/or sewage treatment facilities to serve the project are to be designed, constructed, conveyed, owned and maintained in accordance with Collier County Ordinance No. 88-76, as amended, and other applicable County rules and regulations. 5.8 TRAFFIC A. All traffic control devices.signs, pavement markings and design criteria shall be in accordance with Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Manual of Uniform Minimum Standards MUMS),current edition,FDOT Design Standards,current edition,and the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), current edition. All other improvements shall be consistent with and as required by the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC). B. Arterial level street lighting must be provided at all development access points.Access lighting must be in place prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. C. Access points. including both driveways and proposed streets, shown on the PUD Master Plan arc considered to be conceptual. Nothing depicted on any such PUD Master Plan shall vest any right of access at any specific point along any property frontage. All such access issues shall be approved or denied during the review of required subsequent site plan or final plat submissions.All such accesses shall be consistent with the Collier County Access Management Long Range Transportation Plan. The number of access points constructed may be less than the number depicted on the PUD Master Plan; however, no additional access points shall bo considered unless a PUD Amendment is processed. D. Site related improvements (as opposed to system related improvements) necessary for safe ingress and egress to this project, as determined by Collier County, shall not be eligible for impact fee credits. All required improvements shall be in place and available to the public prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. Vanderbilt Commons MPUD PUDA-PL20150002166 November 2, 2017 Words added are underlined and words struck through have been deleted 20 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 738 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) e :•-.- - ' ar ended- F. All work within Collier County rights of way shall require a Right of Way Permit. G. All proposed median openings shall be in accordance with the Collier County Access Resolution 01 247), as amended, and the LDC. as it may be amended- Collier County reserves the right to modify or close any median openings existing at the.time of approval of this MPUD which is found to be adverse to the health, safety and welfare of the public.Any such modifications shall be based on,but arc not limited to.safety,operational circulation,and roadway capacity. 4-4. Nothing in any development order shall vest a right of access in excess of a right in/right out condition at any access point. Neither will the existence of a point of ingress.a point of egress or a median opening, nor the lack thereof. shall be the basis for any future cause of action for damages against Collier County by the developer. its successor in title,or assignee. 4. All internal roads, driveways, alleys, pathways, sidewalks, and interconnections to adjacent developments, with possible exceptions for Buckstone Drive and Pristine Drive, shall be operated and maintained by an entity created by the developer and Collier County shall have no responsibility for maintenance of any such facilities. J. If any required turn lane improvement requires the use of existing County right of way or asement, compensating right of way, shall be provided without cost to Collier County as a consequence of such improvement. K. If in the sole opinion of Collier County, a traffic signal, or other traffic control device, sign or pavement marking improvement within a public right of way or casement is determined to be necessary, the cost of such improvement shall be borne by the developer and by County before the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. A. 1 Adjacent developments have been designed to provide shared access or interconnections with this development. The PUD Master Plan indicates these locations. The developer, or assigns, shall assure that any such shared access or interconnection is utilized and shall accommodate the perpetual use of such access by incorporating appropriate language into the development covenants or plat. M. The developer shall provide a copy of a shared road agreement for both Pristine Drive and payments on each prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. N. The project may commence construction of infrastructure, site work, and buildings upon receiving all applicable permits,however Certificates of Occupancy for any buildings shall not lanes arc open to traffic) of the 6 laning projects of both Collier Boulevard, between Vanderbilt Commons MPUD PUDA-PL20150002166 November 2, 2017 Words added are underlined and words struck through have been deleted 21 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 739 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) B. A west bound right turn lane on Vanderbilt Beach Road, at the intersection of Pristine Drive and Vanderbilt Beach Road, shall be constructed by the Owner(s) prior to the certificates of occupancy for any building within Lot 3, as shown on the Vanderbilt Commons Subdivision Plat, recorded in Plat Book 60, Page 31 of the Public Records of Collier County. C. An east bound left turn lane on Vanderbilt Beach Road, at the intersection of Pristine Drive and Vanderbilt Beach Road, shall be constructed by the Owner(s) at the earliest of either the granting of the certificates of occupancy for any building within Lots 5 and or 6 (as shown on the Vanderbilt Commons Subdivision Plat, recorded in Plat Book 60, Page 31 of the Public Records of Collier County) or within five years of the adoption of this PUD amendment. D. The maximum trip generation allowed by the proposed uses(both primary and ancillary) may not exceed 547 PM Peak Hour,two-way trips (total external with pass-by trips subtracted). E. Access to all parcels within the Vanderbilt Commons Subdivision Plat, recorded in Plat Book 60, Page 31 of the Public Records of Collier County, or as amended, shall be from Vanderbilt Way. F. No public access or circulation drives shall be provided to, from or within lots 4, 5 and 6 (as shown on the Vanderbilt Commons Subdivision Plat, recorded in Plat Book 60, Page 31 of the Public Records of Collier County) between the northernmost property boundary lines(shared boundary with Black Bear Ridge of the Wolf Creek PUD) and the northernmost structures governed by their PUD setbacks) of the identified lots. G. Nothing in this PUD shall have any effect upon the obligations under any private agreements. 5.9 PLANNING Pursuant to Section. 2.03.07E. of the Land Development Code, if during the course of site clearing, excavation or other construction activity a historic or archaeological artifact is found, all development within the minimum area necessary to protect the discovery shall be immediately stopped and the Collier County Code Enforcement Department contacted. 5.10 ENVIRONMENTAL A. Environmental permitting shall be in accordance with the State of Florida Environmental Resource Permit Rules and be subject to review and approval by Environmental Services Staff. B. All conservation/preservation areas shall be designated as Preserve on all construction plans, and shall be recorded on the plat as a separate tract or easement with protective covenants per or similar to Section 704.06 of the Florida Statutes. Preserve areas shall be dedicated on the plat to the project's homeowners association or like entity for ownership and maintenance responsibilities and to Collier County with no responsibility for maintenance. Buffers shall be provided in accordance with Section 3.05.07 of the Collier County Land Development Code. Vanderbilt Commons MPUD PUDA-PL20150002166 November 2,2017 Words added are underlined and words struck through have been deleted 22 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 740 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) In the event the project does not require platting,all conservation areas shall be recorded as conservation/preservation tracts or easements dedicated to Collier County with no responsibility for maintenance and subject to the uses and limitations similar to or as per Section 704.06 of the Florida Statutes. C. An exotic vegetation removal, monitoring, and maintenance (exotic-free) plan for the site, with emphasis on the conservation/preservation areas, shall be submitted to Current Planning Environmental Staff for review and approval prior to Final Site Development Plan/Construction Plan approval. D. Any perimeter berms, shall be entirely outside of all upland and wetland preserve areas. E. A minimum of 0.17 acres of native vegetation shall be preserved on-site, including all 3 strata. and emphasizing the largest contiguous area possible. If created preserves will be used to make up any of the acreage, the landscape plans shall re-create the native plant community in accordance with Section 3.05.07 of the Collier County Land Development Code) shall be submitted with the First Development Order submittal for review and approval. F. All Category I invasive exotic plants, as defined by the Florida Exotic Pest Plant Council, shall be removed from within preserve areas and subsequent annual removal of these plants (in perpetuity) shall be the responsibility of the property owner. G. A Preserve Area Management Plan shall be provided to Environmental Staff for approval prior to site/construction plan approval identifying methods to address treatment of invasive exotic species,fire management,and maintenance. H. This MPUD shall be consistent with the Environmental Section of the GMP Conservation and Coastal Management Element and the Land Development Code at the time of final development order approval. I. This MPUD shall comply with the guidelines of the USFWS and FFWCC for impacts to protected species. A Habitat Management Plan for those species shall be submitted to environmental review staff for review and approval prior to Site Plan approval. J. All approved Agency (SFWMD, ACOE, FFWCC) permits shall be submitted prior to final Site Plan/Construction Plan approval. 5.11 ACCESSORY STRUCTURES Accessory structures shall be constructed simultaneously with or following the construction of the principal structure except for a temporary construction site office or temporary sales/rental facility. Vanderbilt Commons MPUD PUDA-PL20150002166 November 2, 2017 Words added are underlined and words struck through have been deleted 23 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 741 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 5.12 SIGNS Signs for this mixed-use project shall be permitted as described in Section 5.06 of the Collier County Land Development Code. 5.13 LANDSCAPING FOR OFF-STREET PARKING AREAS All landscaping for off-street parking areas shall be in accordance with Chapter 4 of the Collier County Land Development Code in effect at the time of building permit application. 5.14 POLLING PLACES Pursuant to Section 4.07.06 of the Land Development Code provision shall be made for the future use of building space within common areas for the purposes of accommodating the function of an electoral polling place. An agreement recorded in the official records of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, which shall be binding upon any and all successors in interest that acquire ownership of such common areas including, but not limited to: condominium associations, homeowners' associations, or tenants' associations. This agreement shall provide for said community recreation/public building/public room or similar common facility to be used for a polling place if determined to be necessary by the Supervisor of Elections. 5.15 LIGHTING Lighting provided at the rear of any building and structure adjacent to the Black Bear Ridge Subdivision,for development on lots 5 and 6, (as shown on the Vanderbilt Commons Subdivision Plat, recorded in Plat Book 60, Page 31 of the Public Records of Collier County)shall be in the form of shielded structure mounted sconces. These shielded structures shall be placed no higher than 10-feet measured from finished floor of the building or structure. The areas identified shall be free of"pole lighting". 5.16 ADDITIONAL SCREENING Owner(s) shall construct a 6-foot wall at the rear of lots 5 and 6; abutting the Black Bear Ridge Subdivision (as shown on the Vanderbilt Commons Subdivision Plat, recorded in Plat Book 60, Page 31 of the Public Records of Collier County).No wall will be located along Tract C,the Preserve Area. Vanderbilt Commons MPUD PUDA-PL20150002166 November 2, 2017 Words added are underlined and words struck through have been deleted 24 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 742 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 3 I RPUDOf-I °II D-I A D N C RPUDWOLFCREEK WOLF CREEKRI {[ ° N m m O IRERESIDENTIAL)RESIDENTIAL)P A N m AO3NC) Am• COy m D Z0CZ > m D PRISTINE DRIVE-RIGHT-OF-WAYDz731MIzN20'TYPE D LANDSCAPE BUFFERNm• 0 n 03 D 0 i, f .,` '" I I q0•TYPED LANDSCAPE BUFFERmOOIrEArF 101yIm264— 1p I I Inco 2N. Fr I+ N. Er >0 2 Z z F I m zi. <O o OA r I 1, A°ycOmmwym, D l I n 1- oI202n0nCOr1O40Im1mIItrDmA N A° C)m> <C)2>ooc(RDD A l 3 Ii N 04-) m 0 a z 0 N O Z A m -0 I - I :O 0gym CR—CD°`O< C I I m CC-I _ZONCOmmWAo o 10000Dc0yI-mOplm C 1 c i I z0 - ZnNzrZgMoOW 3 1I 4G"-,-J =*g'w1mp3yF D q ` I _ D m1 yN° mmOn .Z7 1 ISvcC)2- CNp6CAiZO I DEI--m c0D1>>AD-4 m I y-1 AZ ZCr Orme COI-ym. mmo-r3Ncvz ID-.{ • -- I MP*I ComomcmNp3 I 01 AO m g z V z p g D y O m N D ` I 1 Iii NDm {AZr-,m mIn Mc 0 m I _.y I Pm> OZNN°Oy3 Am 30 ' n i r o Z A A-o m m ma-1-*m1-c r 1 m - I , DA 33 Fmommz-i mayoD°1 A n mmm ZZy›,T,KF Z Dy 03 Q1 D 1 m 01F 03 oCmmxZOOOD i 003 i 50 I ` 3mC3cACPZ=DA ° mT C) I O W m m°O mu)A x m O O H o I 1 rn D mmol Z m O m D m 3 z-I p I * _.. 1 m O NACr NC=Nn I/ > i m y D O z n o A Z 3 0 W I• m __. I mm Z030Kx0l0ry O 1 D°° °{ o m N O r m Z A 1 m ON 0Np( l<-ziDo(nO m IF, zmDlDZomO 7 , 1 `m O m r 2 r o o 0 m 1 0 I o I v C 18-'I m I C0 CD 1mAm O ACCCC)mxmC1 mOO m m mmDOD< rc,Dcc OmmD,CC< < 1 : 1.._,T, 1 pZ 1 Z r O- i r Z m 3,a 1 1 m a _, I, - I m z r oToz5O 11 1°cmznlp O 0, 1 . AN a 1co y O r z m D p O 0 p m CR D Z Z r I - D N 1 mAr•OOm °1gC0{ D- mn CA 1` m JI- m=mZhA mylnA_<Z ZDmA Di I m m m{ D 0 O Z O m-4 r p r°O n xzA1rm r A 1 D y c°m 0 F 0 0 a w 1i rn 71 1 DE211°D OOZI. Rm- I O- 725Dr- a-r MI 1I 1O O a02 r--OWZDZOp mDN7,A1 FDA IiTl Omo CCl I I 9 01 O 71 4F,-1 m< m m y m N° mom z CR° m I I'0 mmimpm z)T0 CVODNvm=y< A t. 1 : m 2 a,A RI p0 N10> r Cf 000 m RI m G)2pm 1 M 1A 0 IDxD 1 A m Z In A{ O O O v o I m D r1r AA-. 1z OAZm W zoomzaZ m V 1 1 A Ir- 0,,, AD(nMrODFM0°Sz mm Ii I E- m 811M>08 800 CCO-U p21 CO-- I I- 1 0 2.- I m o z D A O m° D m m 1 A A A A p p 2 D n m •S I I jI m mDNm pnlxmDin=00m , O AO 1 I D vrVD.,---- Aolnw9I1cm1, m m •I 0> mm10 OyOA mt) Nmmzzmm Z°> g, I• .CD mNz DN N<D{° ,mz>co m . .• I mZmD• m2A0 D C r>e, 3 n I I I I A°-- mi7m• mxNO p5K2cm{ cmmoo I IIir- C1 D CR rn 1,Zj, -Oz>CN 2<NOrm-1 I'I I I ----- I 'a0 C)mmmZo gzrcymmlmmmp I__.—.{..__._.. 1 2 A Zi m D'o z{N m C o v a m 0 1 z 20'TYPE D LANDSCAPE BUFFER I..! .._. 0 C°'RI 1= D m y m r v 0 z 1 r'&50F.z o 20'TYPED LANDSCAPE BUFFER D Z 2 U3 m 0 3 A 0 1 m-D 0omyN-' m C o m 2 o v0i c r RI z m 8 BUCKSTONE DRIVE______-RIGHT-OF-WAY pmmz5 wm NmZcczi<041mr°-xi0 NDRI°n C S1rN1NTISm A0 o mK pyp y N N m{O m z p c m m zp y owr N OkDAm I) co 31A1ZNr 1 y 31y N ACI'n np Zz22D CENTI( ryN m OC CR 50 ilk Z m301A -, yrrnCR >XfJ 2 A1i0 z;Zo m 00{my 0 _CRo1Drn=WCO F 71 mmW D 1 D m m o z m m x,Z 1 m rrn TO y RONECi: CLIENT-- DFs ry /- REVISIONS— VANDERBILT COMMONS, ED er: 1 APIMII VANDERBILT COMMONS MPUD LLC Dw,wNDr: - - - cr I CIO WELSH COMPAINES FEH O FLORIDA,INC. T Q OHECKED Bv tSHEET TITLE I2NW NINTH STREET NORTH, r,6~6 a w S0E20, SUITE 101 pRp-0CT NO.: Caplet Porde W 34 6 CONCEPTUAL MASTER PLAN NCTLEs,il;alo3<a3s q x y^ Carp,can a. t.,woN..J\, J 9.A.2.iPacket Pg. 743Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) His1 i0f4, 2 ,..e liriisr— py „AO .! 8 vmg Oi;i 14 mF. 41 ll I Q, — z g ZZ a N 1 1 oQ„ 2 V8 a 42 XY a igi lig PI 1 ; 1 iti ani p rj s 4 ! 2 n ; p Yi8 4E 4 PZ 1-Mr 5 111 11E1 I N a(..:, 3 s g ;' cs I nIit1' g m I = 8 cn = I C q33 . . 19 aeIP70nD11C I is s $ >- So z 3a A ii; 7 Z I 4; 5 , '4 z k-;r y A. zea A_.F R9 2aF r X W a X1 gi c e gm4 i4 3 1 9.A.2.iPacket Pg. 744Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) Exhibit "G" Carolina Village Legal Description THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; LESS AND EXCEPT VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBEDASFOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE RUN NORTH 89°46'10" WEST. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 34, FOR A DISTANCE OF 1,322.24 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THESOUTHWEST1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 34; THENCE RUN NORTH02°14'20"WEST, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST1/4 OF SAID SECTION 34, FOR A DISTANCE OF 145.13 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHRIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD. A 175 FOOT WIDE RIGHT-OF-WAY,AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL OF LAND HEREIN DESCRIBED; THENCECONTINUENORTH02°14'20"WEST, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OFTHESOUTHEAST1/4 OF SAID SECTION 34. FOR A DISTANCE OF 523.93 FEET TO THENORTHEASTCORNEROFTHESOUTH1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST1/4 OF SAID SECTION 34; THENCE RUN NORTH 89°47'36" WEST, ALONG THE NORTH LINEOFTHESOUTH1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION34, FOR A DISTANCE OF 1,322.04 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTH1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 34; THENCE RUNSOUTH02°13'26" EAST, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THESOUTHEAST1/4 OF SAID SECTION 34, FOR A DISTANCE OF 523.38 FEET TO A POINT ONTHENORTHRIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD: THENCE RUNSOUTH89°46'10" EAST, ALONG THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID VANDERBILTBEACHROAD, FOR A DISTANCE OF 1,322.20 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING;CONTAINING 15.879 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 745 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) EXHIBIT "D " LOCATION MAP N W - -- E s PROPOSED NA GEL — CRA I G RESIDEN TIA L PUD 0 oc NOL F CREEK Loop Rd. RESID. PUD WOLF CREEKMISSION ai RESID. PUD oSubjec t Site HILLS 7/////////// //, 7 SHOPPING/// /////// CENTER VA NDERBIL T BEACH RD. 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 746 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) i .EXHIBIT .7g" — SURVEY.l4-,'i::2:,.,::s1..•:...,.I.'I?,,:,...'.:.,-...,.1:i;4.,.:'e,,:.:I'',:I..1..•J4.7:"I"s.t„':cn'r.r.I:,I.I.4..T2I. Ii,;." I,.Ail'1Ic....,.i,i.i.;`A4l.,41• 1t,,•:.:':,:If1.,..: t:..,:.I'.-i•.'.;.1-iI4•.t:e.L:l!;:i:.2I,I1...,I::p;I.:..!,:''.;...:,.•`,'.:•.......,.:, .•:...qik.44-,.r`g..•...)g,1I.1..,,.;%.-..,:..,.:..e5i,-,.-,!$4;,:'; I1l, VIrwr/ 4gi.riili;.. x','.,2.,•1'g..,:,,:, •: itt1-.' 1••:"Z* flt. ii11l1Vdick!t!-t..t.•!.r:1:!p,iV,,.k::: IPi:.,' . t r l01111444100lt c.7,5;:,5'-:..•$g..'-..-.l..P.o..•:t§s:i, tt*;,:'. eN4:..—I111illIgialtIqlsts:l'it1 It.:; z 0 2 .i• 1 $4:ti X z0011 1zf • g. i )t tii9iiii6g,h a gli il 1 k -g it 11*!I!*11ixiik 119 t tRME ; 01 1 ht !lt !Ilitlitii*I! !!'iAl! EA - ;tNot p -3 -Itselidtii!. . lsisi bei 1;; „.4' ; i li : i ml t f *,.: . ,. -•.- 1 ....1i14IZ!i44:01,11610,14 lit ' 11 " : ii =s1 11 ;,11.1 t& t 1—;11 ;111i4illitrVi:1!116: i, I it. . t la a 4.9 0 ,.., 0 .•,;Tt .14:0 s tqw 111 al f. hli: g o I!...t :.., v , t ,t 4,i4s;,-..1,till le" "il; ligavga i t,. g t* 1 41ti11. Z1Ctlt,4 II. CANAL O.W. A.- - M. ..itgotWARDCR.95/ 11 tie' I a 1 t g ••••"'N1ZA4 X ik g.t... . it [... igt 1 -,,. H fa 6.1 rr- Etri - I z. .-1 IE 0 6; 1.! k '''z..! ''-1 i- ..' •'!.kr $ ''' •'- AI arven-w 32503' 1 i4FIII.-,21t- 77_jIt';4".•tt'= 7. 4 I I C I 44. II I t140, I I: I7, ttt I4.1 i` ft I 4VI . i - 1%,. 4 . ' i . t `45' .4 • g.=.i 1 1 t t 1 1il il. I s -1 I - •4 'C..1' ' ' "576 I I - I • . - IV-r-4,1=4:•;:......... 1--"-'1) 1 4A itii 1 i 1 It111I14 •1 t§1 I . aft/I/WV 4,\ 4440, 4I. --- e I9.A.2.iPacket Pg. 747Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) 0, 01 sit, K L. e 7a at. y FLORIDA DEPARTMENT Of STATE RICK SCOTT KEN DETZNER Governor Secretary of State December 15, 2017 Honorable Dwight E. Brock Clerk of the Circuit Court Collier County Post Office Box 413044 Naples, Florida 34101-3044 Attention: Martha Vergara Dear Mr. Brock: Pursuant to the provisions of Section 125.66, Florida Statutes, this will acknowledge receipt of your electronic copy of Collier County Ordinance No. 17-47, which was filed in this office on December 15, 2017. Sincerely, Ernest L. Reddick Program Administrator ELR/lb R. A. Gray Building • 500 South Bronough Street • Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0250 Telephone: (850) 245-6270 www.dos.state.fl.us 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 748 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) RICK SCOTT Governor KEN DETZNER Secretary of State R. A. Gray Building 500 South Bronough Street Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0250 Telephone: (850) 245-6270 www.dos.state.fl.us August 8, 2018 Ms. Crystal K. Kinzel, Interim Clerk Collier County Post Office Box 413044 Naples, Florida 34101-3044 Attention: Martha Vergara Dear Ms. Kinzel: Pursuant to the provisions of Section 125.66, Florida Statutes, this will acknowledge receipt of your corrected electronic copy of Collier County Ordinance No. 17-47, which was filed in this office on August 8, 2018. Sincerely, Ernest L. Reddick Program Administrator ELR/lb 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 749 Attachment: Attachment G-Application.pdf 7-3-19 (9746 : PL20180003366, Vanderbilt Commons PUDA) COLLIER COUNTY Growth Management Department Zoning Division Comprehensive Planning Section August 8, 2018 To: Jeff Klatzkow, County Manager 85 / Patricia Morgan, Director, Minutes 86 Records From: Marcia R. Kendall, Senior Planner Comprehensive Planning/Zoning Division RE: CCPC Consent Agenda Hearing Packets for August 15, 2019 "GGAMP Restudy Amendments" - GMP Full Scale Amendments (Adoption hearing) You previously received complete CCPC hearing packets for their meeting that was held on July 18, 2019. The items presented required some changes requested by the Planning Commission. Therefore, please find attached the revised pages added to the packet for the CCPC's consent. 1) Supplemental Memorandum 2) Revised GGAMP Master Plan Element 3) Revised GGAMP GG City Sub Element 4) Revised GGAMP Urban Estates Sub Element 5) Revised GGMAP Rural Estates Sub Element Final versions of the above documents will be provided at the BCC meeting scheduled for September 24, 2019. Thank you! Cc: David Weeks, GMP Manager CCPC/BCC Memo folder 2019 Zoning Division•2800 North Horseshoe Drive•Naples,FL 34104•239-252-2400 CONSENT AGENDA 8A Cofer County SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: ZONING DIVISION—COMMUNITY PLANNING SECTION DATE: JULY 19, 2019 SUBJECT: GMPA-PL20180000261, GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN AMENDMENT, CCPC ADOPTION RECOMMENDATIONS At the July 18, 2019 CCPC Adoption Hearing of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan Amendment, the CCPC approved a motion to adopt (4-0) with text and map changes. The applicable revised text and maps are summarized below under the titles: • Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element and revised maps; • Golden Gate City Master Plan Sub-Element and revised maps; • Urban Golden Gate Estates Master Plan Sub-Element and revised maps; and • Rural Golden Gate Estates Master Plan Sub-Element and revised maps. The full master plan documents attached (Exhibit A) show the clean text with highlights where the recommended changes were made. Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element I. INTRODUCTION As part of the revised Growth Management Plan, the County adopted the original Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) in 1991. The GGAMP was further revised in 1997. The Golden Gate Area Master Plan provides growth management regulations for the designated Golden Gate Area (sec Original as shown on the Golden Gate Area Master Plan Study Areas Map) Map Series Changes Original Golden Gate Area Master Plan Study Areas—map revised to change the name and reflect the current study areas of Golden Gate City,Urban Golden Gate Estates and Rural Golden Gate Estates. Words underlined are added,and words stmelc-through are deleted as CCPC recommended adoption changes. GMPA-PL20180000261 Page 1 of 29 GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN STUDY AREAS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA HENDRY CO. COLLIER CO. STUDY AREA ////ir MTh MM' ALES LAKE TRAFFORD ` C.R. 846 \4 ill Fr LEE C• COLLIER Co p�� !27N , �/ I �T C.R. 846 � 1� CITYgElli : S.R. � A I -75 NAPLESr rn yrill 3/L, cnN G t Ill Li r 01' vi J.: • . At x 1,14 vi A IJP-/: / 4ItiP F)' MARCO '1° ISLAND �\' l., 4livii, -,ms's ,t1 gvy .-..1*. 14 1 "4 1ai1k� '�*r,A i. EVERGLAD • AMENDED—OCTOBER 28,2004 1►,�t1. $47 CITY Ord.No.2004-71 SCALE AMENDED — OCTOBER 14,2005 _ r,• (Ord.No.2008-59) Q jj i`• r y '-'...\,0 5MI. 10MI. i �{j Ao C�j�HOK• OS' E P EPARED BY: GRAPHICS AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT SECTION © ' iX OMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION FILE: GGMP-9B-2008-1.DWG DATE 10/2008 GMPA-PL20180000261 Page 2 of 29 GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN STUDY AREA COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA SR 82 LEGEND i•%i• i Golden Gate City A Urban Golden Gate Estates �� 9 AKE TRAFFO"D RD Pir-_ k N Rural Golden Gate Estates Ro12 LAKE TRAFFORD r m IMMOKALEE RD \ ` BO ITA BEACH RD C ❑ i \ \��InIti .gl U f IMMOKALFF RD 14Nii F. DER:ILT: :JAI \� �` NS AGA •• 260 -■ I/o zJ �l o Z ►������� -9 r- O��/..•,•,•.•\ %s m • INTERSTATE-75 CITY OF �f DAVIS BLVD NAPLES 4 I. ,,,, k.,,.,. OG lT O, 1,. ,m o . ,s4„-- 1--- \'. 7 , „...„� AMENDED-OCTOBER 26,2004 VJr 7/ Q- (Ord.No.2004-71) O+ AMENDED-OCTOBER 14,2008 T QO- pf} (Ord.No.2008-59) �� J y z ji ,,, 2'.7.;,. .. . st# MARC (At r ISLAND t • fr\,y • N - 0 1 2 4 6 Miles c ' PREPARED BY:BETH YANG,AICP GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT �'_' , K DILE'.Golden Gale Area Master Plan Areas.mxd '��[ C DATE.9]I2019 VQMPA-PL201800002O1 Pdy U- of 29 Golden Gate City Master Plan Sub-Element Policy 2.1.5 Collier County shall discourage new land uses along Golden Gate Parkway and within the Activity Center that impede pedestrian activity and are solely auto-oriented, such as car washes, storage facilities, auto dealerships and drive throughs. Land development regulations will be established initiated within two years to ensure compatibility of auto-oriented uses within the pedestrian environment. 1. URBAN DESIGNATION: URBAN MIXED-USE DISTRICT AND URBAN COMMERCIAL DISTRICT d. community facilities such as neighborhood churches, cemeteries, schools, and school facilities co-located with other public facilities such as parks, libraries, and community centers,where feasible and mutually acceptable, fire and police stations; f. support medical facilities such as physician's offices, medical clinics, treatment, research and rehabilitative centers and pharmacies (as long as the dominant use is medical related) may also be permitted provided they are granted concurrent with or located within 1/4 mile of existing or approved hospitals or medical centers which offer primary and urgent care treatment for all types of injuries and traumas, such as, Golden Gate Urgent &are. Stipulations to ensure that the construction of such support medical facilities is tmi concurrent with hospitals or such medical centers shall be determined at the time of zoning approval. B. Urban Commercial District 1. Mixed Use Activity Center Subdistrict Certain uses specifically intended to support economic development in Golden Gate City are allowed within the Mixed Use Activity Center. The following uses as identified with a number from the Standard Industrial Classification Manual are allowed as will be provided for in the Golden Gate Parkway Overlay District. The Overlay District will include standards to address compatibility and building scale. a. Advanced manufacturing, including automated apparel (2211 2299, and 2311 2399), light assembly( -7-9)and 3D printing(3571, 3629); b. Call centers(7338); c. Software development and programming(7371); d. Internet technologies and electronic commerce(7371); e. Data and information processing(7374); f. Professional services that are export based such as laboratory research or testing activities(8734); g. Other uses as may be determined by the Board of County Commissioners consistent with the intent of supporting economic development in Golden Gate City. Words underlined are added,and words struck through are deleted as CCPC recommended adoption changes. GMPA-PL20180000261 Page 4 of 29 2. Golden Gate City Urban Commercial In-fill Subdistrict This Subdistrict is located at the southwest quadrant of C.R. 951 and Golden Gate Parkway. Due to the existing zoning and land use pattern in proximity to the Commercial In-fill Subdistrict (see Golden Gate City Urban Commercial Infill Subdistrict and Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict Map) and the need to ensure adequate development standards to buffer adjacent land uses, commercial uses shall be permitted under the following criteria: 3. Santa Barbara Commercial Subdistrict The boundaries of the Subdistrict are hereby expanded to include the former Commercial Subdistrict and also to extend approximately one (1) block to the east of the former boundary (see Santa Barbara Commercial Subdistrict Map). The intent of the Santa Barbara Commercial Subdistrict is to provide Golden Gate City with an area that is primarily commercial, with an allowance for certain conditional uses. The types of uses permitted within this Subdistrict are low intensity retail, offices,personal services, and institutional uses, such as churches and day care centers. Such development is intended to serve the needs of residents within the Subdistrict and surrounding neighborhoods and persons traveling nearby. 4. Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict Within one year of the effective date of this Subdistrict, The Land Development Code shall be amended to establish a zoning overlay containing regulations to implement this Subdistrict. Map Series Changes Golden Gate City Future Land Use Map—map revised for consistency so all land use district boundaries are abutting regardless of rights-of-way. Golden Gate City Urban Commercial Infill Subdistrict and Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict—new map to revise name and remove Urban Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict locations outside the boundaries of Golden Gate City. Downtown Center Commercial Subdistrict—map revised for consistency so all land use district boundaries are abutting regardless of rights-of-way. Urban Mixed Use Activity Center—map revised to remove hatching within the existing activity center boundary. Words underlined are added,and words struck through are deleted as CCPC recommended adoption changes. GMPA-PL20180000261 Page 5 of 29 INTERSTATE 75 — ---. / CO M x a S o 0 o a ° � D7a 2 5i m m n n y Tv 0 D n m 0 m o 3 ? d ; c w O 3 cn o; 5' 3 a r O , 7 3 0 r- o a C ?' = 3 a s m nr n, v a m 3 d o rn Z v CO m a' w' 3 (D G) u) d c - 3 Fi-I CDXIm o � n' c a a h N z ON m SANTA BARBARA BLVD p 1 141O D r t k aCi 11, \Olio, o m \ H \ =. I -12: ''. 0 0 Ii 1 \ W C O. \ = n XI a. o \ ` 3 an o m It 277 = cv r. ► = C N , _ -, y m a 0 a Fi. \5 fa 3 v coo N COLLIER BLVD T 49 S INTERSTATE 75 ,Z a=o pam 1 " O 11g C cn o 0 0 D o m o 0 o a m m ami = F = a 0- :n7' CT V. 0- = m R. m = o 0 p N m N F 00 0 = \• _53a Q A 0 0 Q = a0 03 af> m D m n n m 0 O _o>m O n 5. T d 6 o C o Cn o < 0 o < n, 0 m 3 B- o r n� �1im cn 3 0 3 r o c� ;m= mm m c 3 0 a C) rn o m 2. m 054 N >o m 0 o 3 N 3 cQ z Z — co :N d m 0 3 CD c� ^ CA C1 r A 1, O a m c a Cn a , m = 0O D YJ C aza Sm a a N N d Q P• m m - w oXI xx x - O 0 O x A M (D O Y 8 = z m y - M SANTA BARBARA BLVD - \ � — ? ` 0 ", D r 11 Q CI o � N a c CD CTD � � � 1'11 \IN o m '< M 3o n m o Z 00 v C ` _' to 0XI Q � o m 3• o G ` ET,. Fr; 3 a rt -, o D Z O W rt v y 7 rr d C• 0 - a1 I c cnC Cr O - -d S VI Q 7 Cl. rt � C – m rt -' n:Fil3 n3 K - n a 5 3 vi SU —N 1 COV 0 COLLIER BLVD 0 EMME MEM mD 1 - 1IlI1!5iIIL ME=MI FrA W— s -ME- --m � um O _Z8 yy IlIIIJIIl a,l,1'13 _ NZ2 1,� �� - .= m O o '� I./-1:IN.11:1� - oK-I \ I .m m A-1m > I - I 1 I poi 0 I i .--l= \,.. --,., , ,i siTA ids Na � � i--1---i A ISEOmnIIID cm AID— HEI 4v -- _ 1 Imo _74,e-reN8,____ == I.. _r _._ - 1% hwiti.--,11= 1 ...... Ictii tr.., /4. imiammi _-, ° A,Ikoommilill 0 1 1 awAl.. /%. .,1 1 7 ii. .• 1 1• .1 ? , c. , i 1-----vt):_• ill _o 0.0 . 0 , rw'rE _in i D o m.-5 IHHII-iii i'r D D 11111 NoZS oZm oZy oO� YD ,,O0 0 00 D • m 1 OZn pN O C 0m El OW o ' om U I ti m Oo �I W --=--- (1-.' MI- i £ --=-MI-: 0 005fn O O O =-s ; S ------ nm m J 0 .)y tp 2 w Q VQIHO'1d `C.LNf1OJ IIHI IOD N z ,LOI2LLSIGHIIS rIrIIdNI rIVIDITHI iIAiOO Sale,LSa LEVO N0QrIOD GNV .LOIH,LSIGEHIS rIrIIJNI rIVIO2IIIAIINIOO NVH I11 LEND NHC IOD or _.. _ ._. ..... .-.. _..._.,_ ._. .... Dr 0 111 I I I 1... _ _... 0 K° � I a 3, m4D7m w w a z g p1 1 r » I Z r._. m Z Z K g .__ 1 ant. Barbara B VD I ° n S _ alta Barbara BLVD %9.13 m D mzcDL1-i s -1.. , T. '° Tr° cal WAY N ry �m 1m 55th TER SW ''''435 ct °' ,,, ' N5 Si m 1 a v, 111. 3 1111... O r < ,� " 55th ST SW A.. a 4 55th' .SW S 54tH LN SW ... O O 3 4r-• 54th TER SW t- CD 54th TER SW N c x ro x t r f c 6:7) m V'. 54th ST SW n2 2' m"_� T< > a 4 ,_ e a ti 53rd ST SW '5'. a a 4 t53rd ST SW.. 2 o -4 r sra 5.td LN SW y tT5ow � _ MS N'1 PuZS si .gid • S - 52r TER 9W N t n Hunter BLVD y 9 52nd TER SW Z'', 44"v \ y� 01 AA, O '''...2' v O „52nd ST SW b = 51st TER SW ^' 1111 n l o > y n O N -o- r - 5 mom, N: _ 5♦e �p n— 4. 51SISTSW .. �_,.P O F * S r'8 d� V �� a o O ��----�� O ��'� �LF.s O, '0th TER SW ,.,� `.J (0th LN SW _ __ � , m IA 0�� /^� < MS 21314105 d4, oc, 50th ST SW MS y5 U1o'. C) r._. .r r 5 .„.S W N n .7 SW '..�, C� ;�� w'�� L N Y ti v —O ` 11,1 m `, •..� 1111 N ��...4I ° a li v O 49th.LN SW.. : A 69th TER SW r O a r- �G N u5 F7 lk '' '' N'' I—I . ? 49th$T SW O A. r �--1 ` f lath TER SW '1111.. \\ r �S TT - �.-- Sunshine BLVD su 3 tTi t0 by Z ,. - 1111. 47t@ i 7., �s1 V 46th TER SW tm_ Q ERSW S Y. C) ° 46th ST SW H O 'N 'ti 47th ST SW 5- M' N N 45th.TER SW 7J 7 tii E. 46th ST SW '� z f /�P:J m 45th Sr SW a l 1 r.r m ,- m m m 2 9 m o 4.th 5T SW 5 r <^ Z Z o y a v <,1 . , ,=rs' 1111 t--1 Om OT 00 9 w m m �7� 44th.TER SW '11'�� a a a 1111. w s � u+ A ZO 2� Zm D NCD �� alVti t l N N Z N m ? yL S ---k 44th STS - 44th ST SW 7 oOm OC o3 1111.. ym N �,' _._. _._. 1111 1 .; H 9, -,-.7 a0 41th.TE-SW.. fz .i3rd1N•w r mA m��A 1111 N N o t N 43.TER SW ' r^ 8 o g a L 111 1 Ord:S Iy SW I D N 43rd ST SW - m `- 43.ST SW uo fy n I. v v ,,_:i 42nd TER SW! 2- 2 Z V) 42nd TER SW a x 1--- < * ♦42nd.ST SW 42nd.T SW rr 42112liSW. 1111 r a l u H rDir- 41st TER S ..41st TER SW 41st.ST.SW.... L. 41st ST S'V 1111. 1 0 i ,,,._J = r„ r a Collier BLVD „..rBLVD a���� ' Ted O CI _ 35th ST SW F pz m a i..__ J N N o . �nz 7 ° Ji I i ..i O aOn �� N G _ , M i n 1111_._ _. --- ,.. '. ,._- �,D<,rt. I _-,—, a- .. / m III w m 0 D 1111.. I; ___.1n_.._._, ----__,,,._ __. ... ..,.f..._ '_ - w .. u r. _.- _,,,._. 1111_1 —_ -- '- � 1111. rI Doom IA m r _� !.iIaBab!!!D i Fri �� San Ber are W - O -1 13 m 2 111111■1�111■ !i.. 'i■■■■■■■■11 7■ i■■ in..■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ a n_11 .15 D o 3 6 imummip � A P 19111111■ el I 1('111111111■ ■1111■1111111MMI PIM AEU Jo Uj N O X1111111■■ ■,� ION t r ■♦♦� �►♦ 11 �� . .'. 1111 .. Sr♦♦♦ �r♦♦1�1�11 �� . . .■ 1111IS .. ..1 ��1 . o K Mumma W \‘ /♦♦ �►♦ ♦ ■� . .■ ■■ . .. ..I 1/■■C rn zm r ■ el. *���� .:4 �` V . .■ NM ■. .. .., �� ■■1111■■■■� ♦ �� ♦ 0♦ �� , 4� ■* 1 M■ ■■ ii 1i sir '�■■■ * ■1Ll�1!1!!!uni�� ♦i ♦� ��� O ♦�•• i . ..II" 11 ��`i� ♦1 8�1 `��•, ♦♦ ♦*♦ •r1■ ,�► 1111 .. -41:01. ♦4 111 ♦♦ ♦ ' - �� ♦♦ ��• .■ .TA ■� ..`ice[11111■■$* - o jj..,� ♦* ♦♦♦. ♦♦♦♦�y11•■11 B■ i■ �e t ■r1■■■r♦1/ 21 ILIPLMI cn ►���• 4\ \ ��ri■� �� ® ` 1111111 ■ pr •w �� . ` ri rrn ■moi■■■■ •r •'11■■11■1111111rr ♦♦♦ ♦ �_ im rrI '1■■!!!1 I 1111111111 ♦1 ► ,� .�-,.ir .. _ .11,91■ ■_o : : �'iA��� �! i �� 111141 u -�11■!!���J=1111 �1rrr r7 14•14 ,fr.\- '. I allr1111111111111 O MN !IMI;, : 4 4 i%::' fig ■ .. Ilia' r1■■11r� •♦ ♦ 1' ♦, ly ■■ j !!u,..uuw l H sin n. NMI 11101 II MI 0 111!1►� =�■■1!!!!1111■■■■� '���� �� �ia:i 1::i Hol am i i[■■■!!�!I1!91111/ ��• *'*�r1� ii i y i c� C� Q ■11*111 ■ . ♦♦. i s ♦♦‘,74 i rii nowerin 4. .. .. . . y !111.11.1■ .%_. .•;4-. •ice• %'N:+mai tpci r"1 � 1 I I l 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 lD i��� 0 #/* ♦�j�' �1. 1 f 1111■■111�11 o n -,op.\■■■■.// . •o-♦ ♦-• . �j�1 11, _.I■�1 • ■■■■ O mi ■ ■■■111■■/� '♦���•�,�•i�'Q►��1��j�j•�Nc--..4.41‘.--*Nommummui A' 4 LEA i ��■■■a■■■■11■rrrrr■•■ •��;��♦♦♦4 1� �♦V*,. ♦ _1\ ■11111■1 r 7� ii .i . r■r• ♦ 4�♦ ♦ Z •� .. ■!�RN lII o n II I. .. ■MIPM1111�A■■■■■■■rte■■ •�;�*♦ ♦♦♦ 1 • NIN` i i X1111111 g y~y o-ao.."I I. . r■►•, •♦ tot ♦♦ • • ♦S - '- ..[ b t'" Z m o m o m I. . 1111 ■1■■11111111■■ ■ �• ♦ la IA d v n o a o I. .. �. rrr• ♦♦ i• • �■ \\ �. 9 Z o z). Z o I. .. .. ■!!!!!l1��11■1■11/ ■ •, a. . ` m Mum 0 0 0 0 o o �. AI. ;1. ■■llin ■111■■■■ M ./ »�. . 1�■�■�1 to 1111 '/� � LIM � ■ 1111 d 'E-4,',!''-(73‘'„','"�� ii di Ill a O la �■ r/ir� e♦ �I/■■ l �I'ii i !II'�lhllt���1 v�N ■. .. .. = 1�• :� i■II�l1 421 :AIN. _ C■. .. .. .. �♦ 30 0 ••• ' .. u. . . sw__.l n■. .. .. gm ♦♦ ++►l ♦I♦♦ •■ 1��! !�1■ ■'� . 1111!■. .. .. .. ♦11 ♦♦ ♦�• y11. .. .. .11 ��` ♦♦I ••r ■11!1111111 M..■1111111111ME ►A4���♦ Oh tl 111111 . 11 Iii IIva ruT .. ;a. .. .. mmounum 1■11111111M!!�1■■11/'j! \ % �41!P!!I ai MO Num J.al 0 444 • 1111111 ■. ••!`"1.1 u• •• 111111111■■��•• . •• !►� •• .1�"��. immix: .. .. . :Mi IA ;ram 6' 0 L ' 16110 I 10 IN MEM 41 S 1 y q1■■1���a: si.�. . G o0 o00 o •11111111 MUNE �O O O til im ��'�'�'�• 1111 • °076,69 41 st TER SW o()Z z z ri: ■■1/%/111.1111■ j a 00 ;, es [ 1 Z,, tv 1N 411�lt111111111l.5 ■il l- .. i I I I i 311 C Z �■■E41111111111■11►� �.�-,...c- � (_. III 1 W1111111111111010. x Collier BLVD - . . — 2111. PA II E.I84, g c' PI a Be!EL D ..iin, iP San Bar am LVI Iiii- a.7 ax;!---". sill2------ -nimmilimmilhummummomi ornmuli g q mmumemPIIN Wei 0U: IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 11111111111111111111111111111111 111111111111111111PAM11111 1,311. M 0 P1'. 11-' 1 11111111111111N1 Ali tttl ' 8 kN*NN ik,_ .11,91111111111111 a IN Immo 1 -,,. 4111111111111 % 1.111A,SW All -51 1p 006, ,,,,,,„, ,,....r. ..;• MINIM Ernir=117_ 1 l''•31- Pg' , ,k. - ow leivi OW 11111# z 11"1"4"11116 to4NA " Sit tirt%IS itik 4111111 Mill - Willa! o 2 .11111 00 1/AW 4* i AW rioiamin 01 • •IS •• •• . al NI NI NI NM ler. ril eliiifigat . o 2 (1 VIIIIIRPOINII oval okNN0 00 01$ 144, to . I. mom ■• 1.• ... nuimurimi sunimmitoo"w A • *, .011 r. sm im a ELI MIN rumi#11" al , a t. IN mil NM u u u A naitruit 11- ( .• 11 Almo m. ma 'I. imi mmi Firm NM ELI mos VA' - • 111 wil. 1. - * ifr 4 401111111h lin ma Elm -Aim mg 1100111 . • # OM la w go r -Li 1.11111m 4 # \* # # $ • iL ,.--------, WM 1. b.% in r (1) al Milinigited - c) • . coC u RIANA * ;i40111MEM ill U _/— mr_ u _Eziii-n-mmiso_____,Jous0 0, - 0 , cp Re - a'4444'` k"'N sair 'UM m 0 limo r77:10011 - I 111111111111.. ..-t#:. isx •-,,,,,,- EN :: -1 virus Nakal - Q IT im• mummust.- li, mik, N,', _.& fili II riiliiiiiii riTiti o in Mos mi CD 0 MN IN 6 de ''' \if,k\,,,510'' A owe linFirniiiKAILIte a Num us - ii -- • V.* V •:*", MN 1 filmummum[ill 8 1 Ns- ilrliwift/A p - • 1. • • 4 MIL a SIMPP11111111111111 NMI . 3 - i ill 4 V old& , . #, 1,4 mi El rpimmummumnit • 2. ..,.„ Ilimaimoti clk ;I p inmesuints, a H I- \3 . NMI IIII N. - o is Nolo a 411111111Mit Fill1110b. *, 4 ME IA] tin gm al g cp mi.twi9,14 kit ,=. se am Now MEI I. IN c'm 1111.11" ININNIMITIO V. & lit /111 El moo ill El MN MEI IN MI O 11111 • NM MIIIN "a MI 1111111W ------"'Ell tii 3: 1 El tC2I t.1 al 1111P4M111, . 8. # MI a MI OR r_,' H rz si 11111111111111111 •- A, •liii .1 al INI t•ri tii k si MIPPIP1911 ,ILJI, pci pci z EMENUMMEN 2 • iiommumiii • ION '4.411114 niommoi -I ''' m m a e• =i 1 i ii0 i ic[ill:D. 0.10$ in p » 1 iii I "st.'Ismummumass:, ..,•AIli I ill I 9)II 11 ill I I I 11 -i c.PIJ in Suminimummusio1111011100.*, s$ • tap ii A \ .... 4 -0-0_-, I .... 11011000 4 00 to 0114 SO k\‘\Psi 4:[ IIIIIIIIIIII °Ol 9'al 9 On BM MN II. 11111.111111111111 ----0011 1011 lat 0 %Slo /se ‘ N,,,, al is iiiime > a . 1.1 'mn" 1114114111111111 ill ,T,0 F,s..." v) NM Num _. 01 **1 I ig IN OW 111MTIMIN C) .9 In 78 SA on mann Oil 11211 VA %I t ... : sk,x1ft m_r_isummo ed ci `F,),i> v 8 mo me mg In emiteme,IS we ifi LI• a : a: al. roam= :.: MN 1111111 vim ins fre spot yrs mitine 11 IN sm Ain • ...... m ... •6) Ill. 61111.1 Ira PIIIIMI 414 111110111 %PRI AB 411i 1 li Ea 211 11111""." H ini I ........r:: : woussiummumilli 3: ri sr" -111.1111m..ul F.1 ] ur 8 8 ill?:717:11:11.:I I 116.:.1 1:Ili 1 i m m 1 Oiwoli$0$1.:111 11 II 11 I:II I LI 11:11:II IL I ill 1 in_ii.__i _nii.mil I I 1 ii 1 i rri;II 1 1 I 1 w i wars. ;mil LI! H S:2 /11. #40 111 MI i. us nom ma mum ____........,11111111111111111111111111111111111 MOO us you ma dma ni. ram mos u 11111111111111 , ,H--7 gimp a: is :: so i 0 0 1111111111111 It j . '' ‘ % -iumm •MI MIN NM MIN iI . i IIIIIMPI it 01: LIN :II .1.1 am sus LI ammo II. 2 45 % mil ammo In mg mg gm .0 -,r,0 › r. = 1111111111MI lal in 0 IN 1111111PPIN INN gm limp ?gm in Ex• .....-. r-' ro 0 0 0 ..I sir. _ MI MI .41 NJ C) cg 2 LA lila 112111111111111111111116 .1 too`'qc) ei9g 11111111111 ral HMUNIMMEMI dillIPPEFF, will mi a co -.73 o ° M nim • &' ill 21 1111111111WIPPfilj, 00 ° ti 6, us NI. •°* z la mumnimmou • %fog i IN MI 111111111111MIN o C) - iiii IIIIIIIMPI1111111111 • g L., 1112 PPNIIIIIIIIIIMil mumuumunito c )it,......,,,,, i -11 I 1 — 0 m c-5 70 alo I Le miemin -0 , lib Cl) 0 1. () H Collier BLVD - 111 • ars III . am ,:, URBAN MIXED USE ACTIVITY CENTER GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY AND CORONADO PARKWAY COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA '. :b e- errs`___lq ittj%♦� '♦♦+i►♦�♦4.4;411711111111111.111 ■� I �` ♦♦♦ ♦;;;A";*•■� � •`a/////err tt ♦ �' �� 11loom ■ ♦ ♦411„♦ .piw ��■att� ♦4- ♦ ' �f .. ■' ■ /III► ♦� ♦ $•- Li . MIN mai •' !//H//►//I►ttt 11 '♦♦♦ 1 .1 -,IP , : ■i WM ■ a.M!■h►ir .. '*•♦ �'♦ ♦ ■■■■////�!I►tt��#. 44!t ♦♦j1♦j 11'�L `. :: ■M ,. +♦♦'♦♦♦'/♦�� '♦♦♦►♦♦♦ ♦♦♦t� 1 111111111 loom :II ■ M♦+♦ • ♦ ♦ ,♦♦♦■////Inr.1 ♦♦ ♦11] 1j j�♦ . _+'�ii■■ #�a♦� ♦ ♦! �l �lr►�♦ ♦ 1 111 ♦ 1♦ ■ iIirtitINIt♦ t, ♦ ♦■■an.\,.4P • 1111]a♦ 11 loom/////■ ■. ill lo• of wry*-11♦♦ 11 111 1♦ A�00 III !!IPPR/E S1 ////►�♦♦♦ l♦11 11♦ ♦♦ • ►r A1111///■/11 ii. -omom(Plit�I• I.,���11t ��►at ni i 11■11111911R�1//11 ■ - • it r w 400 11 1t v ■ ■. .■1nu Imo. . ft min Am `'s om 01111V• rt, a ■//////////q .■ ■om Imo i t i'�■ i IN iom ii 1 loC ��r4" SU ' ECT ■■ ■. .�4 .. . . ■ as ■. disNEr% ■ ♦■///�!�Iuimi�1/r •■ .■ II ■ loom ■l loom IN Mil 7:1112:11 i■//////////■ ■■ pIIIqpI :S T . ■ ■ ■ /1!�!1�11 H ■■ile loom i lo . //////////■ om■ D !!//////■L1 om lominiom ■ ■/////////////1 ►� ■.� loom 1.111 t ■//////////■.■ �■ 11lIRIl1!///■�,�.■ EN ■ iiiiiiihiIi ■�� ■gE.. - . ■■'0■ romomml.■ . ' ■w.i.a++ arwery,e/ / /// C'` • ■/////////////■ !■u///11'■! ■//////r GaralPalms LN .■////111■!J■ i ■'■ om ■!■!/•/loom■/■ .�1■ ■///I'�■/////I► ` r • loom _ •om MUM ■a•III 1111E1111\11 111111111111*. ♦ 0♦1• ■111r e/■ al D :: ■ 1■■■■■■.�ILMWJ - \41 �r�n1/ /PRS �1■ ■ ■ ■■ ■ ■■■■■loom■■■ - z..__ ; \.`'\ + tworaresd airmium II ri ■ .■ N. _■//111PM ■■■! ■liot/./ `: ♦♦A. �01 r■■///////l loins ■ �I///// loom loom ■ ♦ ♦ rrr . , ■ �tIIIII di C •::!♦♦� � ' ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦rrr r rr/■! ■ lolo lo '_ !/!► �;��i ♦♦11 a��. �j�a , : 11♦♦ ♦♦ ♦♦ ti ,�rr�!Lt�llloom ■ ■ ♦ 1 1 iA C> 4, >44_•#44 ♦ ! ♦ -� loom ■it Mr 1♦♦♦�� 111111 \� 111 � ♦fir! .. . lj !■fltr � ♦� 11111 ♦ y .,o . , ♦ 1♦ 1♦.1A,,,,-- 1l�!1�1 In r:girls��♦♦!4X11 ♦1 '. '? �`' �1�♦ ♦�11j111♦ SW i ■ loom ate'�♦♦� � ♦ �, � � � 1♦ �♦ ♦ 11j oil :. ■■�;;�;�♦•* ,...111 �, . 11�i:,�::�• i►: i ' /� . i%�,s�4 ♦��4►♦1111 ��!,.. 4► 1 *is*'� o,.1 • ' • .■ rrr rr r♦♦�♦ �1��♦♦♦ ♦� 1� ♦� � �., rrr i ii t o���rr'r* ♦ , A ♦4 44. �1 �• it i i� /rrrrtr ttiti 1 ofs rrr �, #‘40♦♦ ♦1 • :ri 1 rr1 ■!11! go.. 1 ♦♦♦♦ts4'r i tee r ■ 113,,C lo so Quik t ♦t♦1 rrr•♦ R ♦ 1 I. t. �'�■� ■ . . ■ rrr 11 N/�t��♦ ` .,r♦♦: v ♦ ■ ■■ ■s IS ■ ■. rrr r♦ �. r �♦�*•,•�,� ♦ ♦ ♦j►�i■ �. ■. ■■ ■loom■ ■. �� � .. �;r�111�*� 1 ■ ■■r■l � 0��' rr**#♦♦� ♦11$ I is on II 10 ■ F is .. loom �, ,. ■ OKI Illj 11L,■ ■I: � 11L- Li.111111V, MIN; 111111r NI me om� omNab in lolo •E 010 III 1r..' ! .. . NM IN lintlir ■. Sit � 1 ■ lomat ! . ■ MEL NW moor AMENDED -JANUA' 25, 2005 OM ■■ ti,,,!, !iI!.!!.!11 � :wI ! I / '/// ////■! .iii:i:: : // //■ !�! 13 // ////loom ■■/////////// ! \1/11////////MENDED •CTOBER142 !///////////P P ►,///////H (Or.. No. 2008 59) .iTiittm.■..wI■IF1■ si��o\ , LEGEND Xi ADDITION PR ABED BY GIS/CAD MAPPING SECTION G WTHMANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT 0 500 1,000 2,000 Feet ACTIVITY CENT LE:RLS-18-CMP-01009 ACTIVITY CENTER MAP.mxd BOUNDARIES DATE:04/2018 i I I I i I I I GMPA-PL20180000261 Page 12 of 29 EXHIBIT A PL20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 URBAN MIXED USE ACTIVITY CENTER GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY AND CORONADO PARKWAY COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA • erg ��I■r► • ,/ ♦. +�1114, R � ♦ ♦ ♦ �,,: . �� !l11/1r/ir# •`�*♦41R♦���wlI■ • :: :, : ■■■/I■ ±l-♦♦��l► ♦ ♦� 0 11,. 1 • �♦ � 1 ♦ :: 1111 : rwerm�` •♦� ♦♦ w• ■■■■■■■■■■/r ♦ ' ♦ • -Y. . __ ■■ : ■■rr • • • rr� 1 • ♦♦mow �1 ♦♦j 0, " :: :■ .9911*••�♦ ♦�•♦♦ ♦♦ t• �'w� ■■■■!■■■11rrj,• Ot• ,ww4R. ��♦♦ ♦♦1♦",1♦: �� i4•www♦w♦w♦ ,♦ 4' ♦,♦ IIII L�;•••41.• � ♦j�j♦�♦♦1 •♦11• �� �■ ]rortp. *II . �+1� w+ ♦ ♦ Vi• i♦ . • . i■■111# •I♦�♦111♦o*♦ c♦ ■1111■■■■ r e 0*„ . !�* lit , &A1,��. 1♦ ♦A ♦♦ •i gLIE■■ i NYA .v. a�; +w♦ 11111► ♦ •• ♦ • •a�� a w+ _E . ■ ��1 ♦♦ 0000 + .• t Valor � n .r . �,��!l�1�1����1♦`1♦4* :�-i i•�r1!!!!III�lA11 ma N. gm ." ■' ii ■ •• 111 ♦ ♦ • n., �■■■■■■■■■■■! _ ■■e _um mil • •■� :_: : - tort, • SUBJECT • 4 . O■11l������1r .L ■- I. IN ii it • SITE _ min n : :■■■■orcin■' : :t : : :: iii IMPIIi i ■11!!•!I�I�LA11■ ■■1111n �• ` .neer . r I I i SI i t ■■1..1.1..1■ z 1H 12 — X111111111111 JA!!;11. 0 •'1111111 /'! Lm aLk WPM= Er Mr ow sus MKN ��■■111■■■1■ • I ■■1111■■■ ■111l11r �� ■ _" VIII 1 I�--r�1 ■ ■ H 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 n■■■■■� n■■■1� � �■ 11 KI i H( 111111W,I o P„ J ■■■■■��■■■■ y 001w—01111■■■■! QIP E 4 .010111 • _ ii. gi miumnumma 1 le � �in • .. am IMIMMMRPIIIIIII,I IN si •1111111■ ii i j44...E♦♦�♦� ilii 1 si:-.74, *mow 1.111A 4. ••le:" "4°1.1414.3i 41 ♦ �� ♦ ♦ 111 stir .. . ilk MO ti NI moo -tumm MUM III sil s -R� ♦ �♦♦♦RRA 4 t. 40 - _too o 'I+ ..+ �rrr�r�� * •♦$,p mossoi$ i IL ��• •♦• ♦1 ► ♦♦ts♦ 'jai, •,•i • 1111 a am a ossr.'��♦ I i ■1Mile ♦♦ ♦♦ ♦ ♦. Ass ■�_ ■• ■ MN iso �♦A �♦� 1 • 111.471.4 �� 1111. �_ _� �■ �■� Mil ■■� /� �■■ mon"//11;0 0��♦��♦♦ 0♦1 • • ■m ■w ow Nu ■ ■■E moi • ■r. _E- ■c rc !!l1R.hn11 at1��ts♦I iii �■■k it .. U iam 2 Num our i ... r NW._. ---- AMENDED -JANUARY 25, 2005 LI . 2 .. ii ii ■• i'm ■■!!!!!111!11 �o i T p ■■ •m rms ■ ■ ■■1!!!!ppli■■■E _ (Ord. No. 2005-3) ■■� . !A, ��---� :� �l • E ! $A IMITIUU!!1■: AMENDED -JANUARY 25, 2007 at • F (Ord. No. 2007-19) ..E1l1■r,�rll*� If� ■MI mu■■■■■■■■■� i ■111!!!11!11!!■ AMENDED - OCTOBER 14, 2008 INN 111 ---�111111111111 ■1!!!1!!!111!!!!! 11111 (Ord. No. 2008-59) mum ki■■i■■■■■ in r. I■■1!llll:iiiii ���ummale11■ LEGEND rirgE ADDITION PREPARED BY:GIS/CAD MAPPING SECTION LI GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT 0 500 1.000 2,000 Feet ACTIVITY CENTER FILE:RLS-18-CMP-01009 ACTIVITY CENTER MAP.mxd I i I I I I I i01BOUNDARIES DATE:07/2019 GMPA-PL20180000261 Page 13 of 29 Urban Golden Gate Estates Master Plan Sub-Element OBJECTIVE 1.1: Develop new or revised uses of land consistent with designations outlined on the Urban Golden Gate Estates Future Land Use Map and provisions found in the Land Use Designation Description Section of this Sub Element. b. Locations Neighborhood Centers are located along major roadways and are distributed within Golden Gate Estates according to commercial demand estimates. (See Urban Golden Gate Estates Neighborhood Centers Map). The centers are designed to concentrate all new commercial zoning, and conditional uses, as allowed in the Estates Zoning District, in locations where traffic impacts can be readily accommodated and to avoid strip and disorganized patterns of commercial and conditional use development. Policy 1.1.6: To obtain Conditional Use approval, a super majority vote (minimum of 4 votes)by the Board of Zoning Appeals shall be required. Policy 1h61.1.7: No development orders shall be issued inconsistent with the Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub- Element with the exception of those unimproved properties granted a positive determination through the Zoning Re-evaluation Program and identified on the Future Land Use Map Series as properties consistent by Policy and those development orders issued pursuant to conditional uses and rezones approved based on the County-Wide Future Land Use Element (adopted January 10, 1989, Ordinance 89-05) which was in effect at the time of approval. Any subsequent development orders shall also be reviewed for consistency with the Growth Management Plan based on the County-Wide Future Land Use Element. Policy 41.1.8 The sites containing existing public educational plants and ancillary plants, and the undeveloped sites owned by the Collier County School Board for future public educational plants and ancillary plants, within the GGAMP area Urban Golden Gate Estates area, are depicted on the Future Land Use Map Series in the countywide FLUE and on the Public School Facilities Element Map Series, and referenced in FLUE Policy 5.14 and Intergovernmental Coordination Element Policy 1.2.6. B. Estates Commercial District 4. Urban Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict This Subdistrict consists of two infill areas. The two areas are located at the northwest corner of Collier Boulevard and Green Boulevard and at the northwest corner of Santa Barbara Boulevard and Golden Gate Parkway. Due to the existing zoning and land use pattern in Words underlined are added,and words struek-thr-eftgh are deleted as CCPC recommended adoption changes. GMPA-PL20180000261 Page 14 of 29 proximity to the Estates Commercial In-fill Subdistrict (see Golden Gate Urban Commercial Infill Subdistrict and Urban Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict Map) and the need to ensure adequate development standards to buffer adjacent land uses, commercial uses shall be permitted under the following criteria: Map Series Changes Urban Golden Gate Area Estates Future Land Use Map—new map to revise name and show future land uses only within the boundary of the Urban Golden Gate Estates. Golden Gate Urban Commercial Infill Subdistrict and Urban Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict-new map to revise name and remove Golden Gate City Commercial Infill Subdistrict location outside the boundaries of the Urban Golden Gate Estates. Urban Golden Gate Estates Neighborhood Center-new map to revise name and remove Rural Golden Gate Estates Neighborhood Centers locations outside the boundaries of the Urban Golden Gate Estates. Words underlined are added,and words Gtruck through are deleted as CCPC recommended adoption changes. GMPA-PL20180000261 Page 15 of 29 / RBAN DESIGNATION ESTATES DESIGNATION AGRICULTURAL/RURAL DESIGNATION XEDUSE DISTRICT 541100 USE DISTRICT O Rwi Seu.n.r n.sa 0..0mn _,umn P.euernm Satarn Q li.. W E.*.SUNnv 10•' y R"•N'ual5,.`.. ems 0eee m OVERLAYS AND SPECIAL FEATURES �•. . ��Comm,.�m e �U1 ® , m �.� GOLDEN GATE AREA COMMERCIAL•ISTRICT OEC°a°"�'°le P"'•a�'�•°� OS�een ao.�ev ea eu NNv M Cher ...a =N.21 Cr.Srm O0 FUTURE LAND USE MAP -I.Iel Somkvxs Co—" - "Ineueme190'..17m IN EDSemeeemere Com-..I SUE1mrc1 NreryWee�geMelSn W4em r -ca1.,Bew.�.m cemm..oe ,rmSea -F IMMOKALEE RD / COMMERCIAL DISTRICT I— _Ita rn Aai vP�uwnSem ummre Nye RVe W Wee e...et ISI IM Pe..BaYwrd Um*Sul*. torr.R M Wuwm Fe m.ins Swam. si,irM eummc I I -:. SmpprN Geer...et - .Dew Sreelevtl GO.®wnavT T� wEC7NES POLES •urowcocvOenlu OMR..iCTIM U TIE rnux 2 oerewnu`wsiTe tiw. 10 _ \ m 5 W 1 1 OIL W'LL RD LI -. U R. 1 ro m RANDALL BLVD _ IMMOKALEE RD Z Z p SUBJECT SITE(ADDITIONS) o o CPSP-2018-2 3 w ❑ ❑ VAN-:RSILT 1 ___ - 4 w O 8 m U GOLDEN GATE BLVD GOLDEN •'TE BLVD �I O IiiI PINE R=GE RD 11 __ , co ❑ /� (0 ZGRE: 9 N 1 03 ILE I 0 Z 5 ° >1 x 0 o E G.PKWYI___\8m ,, ___—_— - __.. r. ___. RADI•:• INTERSTATE 75 INTERSTATE 75 C DAVIS BLVD jjj / R� oCC D'• m j ,5 8 O Z p U CO RATTLES AKE H.MMOCK RD 0 LO F T P/ G OLDEN GATE �/ FUTURE LAND USE NAP .1 / . AMENDED-DECEMBER 1,2007 SS/ ✓ ADOPTED-FEBRARY,1891 ., i/(ORD.NO.200]-]]I AMENDED-NAY 19.1992 AMENDED-OCTOBER 1/3008 (ORD.NO.2008-591 a AMENDED-NAV 25,1893 AMENDED JULY2010 / AMENDED-JULY 21,1993 (ORD,NO,2010.311 / AMENDED 28,2JULY 23,3010 AMENDED"AP / APRIL 12,1991 (ORD.NO.2010-33) AMENDED-MA MENDED SEPTEMBER 1d,2011 � MARCH 11,1995 1ORD.N0. 1 CO AMENDED- OCT OBER 21,1997 AMENDED NOVEMBERMBER 18,2011 CC (ORNOZi W AMENDED-APRIL 16,1998 AMENDED-NOVEMBER/10,2015 (n 8 AMENDED-SEPTEMBER 8,1998 (ORD.NO.2015-821 C' AMENDED-FEBRUARY 23,1999 I AM ORD OENDED•N 2018-12AY 10, 118 N AMENDED-JUNE 13,2017 F. AMENDED-MAY 9.2000 (ORD.NO. 31 AMENDED-MARCH 13,2001 AMENDED•XXX%XXX% OA4ENDEDE SEPTEMBER 10?2003 (ORD.NO.%%%%7 /14 A , (ORD.OCTOBER 28 / AMENDED-OCT OBER 28.2001 / /� 0 0." 1 2 3 (oft-.AN ARY 71) 25, / MIIBS AMENDORO.NO.2005-3J 2005 .0 euneooen c�ors.zo wwuPrem AMENDED-JANUARY 25.3007 j `S (ORD.NO.2007-191 N. R26E R27E 1 R28E 1 R29E ESTATES DESIGNATION MIXED USE DISTRICT COMMERCIAL DISTRICT o ME.beSO 1 °�° 1.IPI ° URBAN GOLDEN GATE ESTATES Coneluonal Use.Sub... _'D"w'.nD�Fti°�M�.,F..sum se S.lilsin Roof Recol.SadsissIct ph �Sum.. ��..dw..E...MME�..e .12 �,�oa r FUTURE LAND USE MAP N. ST J — IMMOKALEE RDIMMOKALEE RD Lr:c1 - z 711 a \ z CD J z VANDgRBILT BEACH RD 0 z Q F 0 -f r J 00o GOLDEN GATE BLVD cc z _ Q 1 .. CD 0 J PINE RIDGE RD Noma. n I- Ian a / GREEN BLVD rl a z O J F- m — z0 r'. ° w Z a J cr 5 a J ~ J J___7" 0 F- CO W 0 -�G-P wt, IAF • / Q co =0 0 CC H Q Z z m J RADIO RD INTERSTATE-75 o_ F— Q .. CC z N o- Q rx DAVIS BLVD u) 0 rl z co m G URBAN GOLDEN GATE ♦— FUTURE LAND USE MAP ADOPTED-XXXX,2019 O 0 O 0 0 0.5 1 2 s Miles RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK RD R26E I R27E I R28E I R29E ,0 N 4 : . .,. . _ r- .q kMEM NIMMI ry 1111.i i min EH > e_°' ‘ . \ r › 1 A 0 3 o 2 c 0 0 V- r Z O F r z m c) rN m p i :L0:1=iI.I_�:I A. -71: •.:Ina>7: . _ �. C 0 > mO C) re rc9x acl�1 �ocAI eou(Evu(o 5 c) 1 1 ,1%;ir --PgT om _ _m„ ♦ 13-,O / T ��� 1% < N r-no / A o 0--- r—mm ` C�z T— OOi�� LI)M M f_i— ,, -,3 i a iiiiI e/1/N , 1 —1 I--1-- 111-t 1 V]( -}In' . i ----• N T , m \_.%--,,,_ I 1 iii•i i% a - II I ___.L_Iii:::::>, II \ 0_ ,o, . \ ; N a .5 q _ .. :i0 FN[i� �__� - I — I i,E,,,,, = v I ti,-,c,Z m oo{ O m.. 39 STRE:T SN ME Nom= Z Z m , -- m m z 1?n z z o oZZ o0 00 00 fOO a a a 0Zr° I I z m5Z O O O m -- 0ymn r- N0 vZ N EMIL m -- 00 O O O p Om roi m2N mWi < m s > MEM III- , -.D, (P_. N ? > O r, cO , n _. $ $ _- NmvN O E N O N S F MIN coS V) 0o 00 f w ' mn (A iU N� CO OZ CD 5 o Vaixorm `xzunoo lamoo 03 N z ionu SIcI 11S 'MANI IVIDITHIMAIOD S0,LV,LSI HIVD NIQrIOD --�, `c) GNV ionusIQg11S TIIMNI rIVIDIT ININOD NVg2I11 HIVO NRQ'IOO oT�� mm v _______.. _._. 9nm <o G1 Z m _ _ m / _. 1.:. • v m /1 -... 7 n A N = .... m i c n u _ T v 7..N -m w - - z O a- z z :. z z -j II C -� . .. NI Santa Barbara BLVD r T,0•sol WAY —• ra Tropical WAY m 55th T 5 SW a 55th TER SW < A - Logan CT .f 55th ST SW v -- 55th ST SW f * -.i..... ' - O ''''',1 � N 1' 54th TER SW 54th TER SW >.' hq N ',al v 54th ST SV) 9 m 9 * _ 54th ST SW - Crle 3 - O u to w ', .... 25 O 9N` NFL \95 n a * 53rd LN SW O MS _P1L5 mei 3� MS 1�'� n y Mrd ST SW <} _......... n r s y m o e ` o NS N1 PO ZS hC. y '- D i - /\ �o hA .yQ s 52n4 TER SW ? S� m .. -LL 4� hi; 9L CNS \\ �y') ' •P2 °,6c sl 3- 4a �.� .. I�Oy-1 N > < Namur BLVD lS 'f' S� F _ i _. l..J - O FL X10�� \ Jti0 y v h" S�lF I ._.... Q m 0 5y5 ,j�yp n Si st TER SW �S� 2 7 t4' S �� tri __.__ i Z s.', ''S ao A y 51st ST SWall 51s ST SW ,ti. tf 9F $ 5.h TER SW 'f to - -- �� a ' SOth TERS . 1 s� 50th ST SW S>.S �r m 9 , n m 11 M y'5v O m `N$ 'n a MS �L m ?<1 r CA H V a 1. tA� w m - 49 W F - .__ -_. LTJ s.J 49th ST SW ¢' J N m _ O�4 �%\''''''''1(5 dIrr 48:11 ST SW _ - ..-. -.-... n U] Su r.lune BLVD m - `y V' 46th Toile= 46th TER SW H 1-� 47th TER SWV - C1 M 6th ST SW < .2' ST SW r T St m 47th ST SW LSu yvN v m 3 r I 0 vIIII: hTER SW y m h TESWmw F 0 1 4 N z wv m ngy m N 4dth STS_ < 3 ..tT S �A}rn 1}tlb wNrY, U MS 6� n ➢ o <N rC = ..,M. N v o * rdSTSW MS 5331 P1LV * -2, Z ..,f.. CA 1 a n " NT m J pO y u m 9 n {�/ _ m m 42nd TER SW - �^y = int ' a - < \/ 2 ra y 42nd ST' V' r 42nd ST SWII IL, I'R Vil0 41st TER SW ' 41st TER SW T = �1G r f 41st s"SW "4m - 41,t ST SW V v < H c $ 40th TER SW N A Ay J '' * Salt ALY 0 anis a!110o : '...011ier It LVD 35111 ST SW' -- r I I I I Li -_L.. z�c CrJ _� cD T C A ^ ._--- _ -DD 4, 1 r'-� co cnmz Mr,N v I if 2 = z. a 5... _. _ _.� r- m __ u _- m. m m _ m .__ - N rn _ m __ D m GOLDEN GATE ESTATES NEIGHBORHOOD CENTERS Collier County, Florida IMMOKALEE ROAD J1 __ OIL LL ROAD _ IMMOKALEE ROAD 0 0] • N • W � W GOLDEN GATE BOULEVARD 111011 1 WHITE BLVD. J 0] • W J J 0 0 INTERSTATE — 75 AMENDED — SEPTEMBER 10, 2003 (Ord. No. 2003-44) AMENDED — OCTOBER 26, 2004 (Ord. No. 2004-71) AMENDED — JANUARY 25, 2007 GOLDEN GATE ESTA S (Ord. No. 2007-19) NEIGHBORHOOD CEN 0 1 MI 2 MI AMENDED — OCTOBER 14, 2008 LEGEND (Ord. No. 2008-59) PR-•ARED BY: GIS CAD MAPPING SECTION NEIGHBORHOOD / AMENDED — SEPTEMBER 14, 2011 CENTERS 4MMUNITY DEVELOPMENTyAND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION (Ord. No. 2011-29) LE: CG 1 ,47 84828AN61 DATE: 9/2011 Page 20 of 29 URBAN GOLDEN GATE ESTATES NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER Collier County, Florida IMMOKALEE RD In ti 1 VANDERBILT BEACH RD \ u N- a J CC) GOLDEN GATE BLVD z z Q a O CD z D , )1Vilii---- C PINE RIDGE RD H o 0 a_ z a O ( GREEN BLVD J Q U m CD 0 tY in J w_ J _ r. m J J ' < 00 Q Ca Q....7„/"- m Q GOLDEN G 'TE PKWY H Q U) 1-75 N AMENDED-SEPTEMBER 10,2003 (Ord.No.2003-44) URBAN GOLDEN GATE ESTATES AMENDED-OCTOBER 26,2004 NEIGHBORHOOD CENTERS (Ord.No.2004-71) LEGEND AMENDED-JANUARY 25,2007 0 0.5 1 2 3 (Ord.No.2007-19) ® URBAN GOLDEN GATE ESTATES NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER Miles AMENDED-OCTOBER 14,2008 (Ord.No.2008-59) PREPARED BY:BETH YANG,AICP AMENDED-SEPTEMBER 14,2011 GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT FILE:Urban Golden Gate Estates Neighborhood Centers.mxd `_ (Ord.No.2011-29) GMPKTPLo2?lt0000261 Page 21 of 29 Rural Golden Gate Estates Master Plan Sub-Element 2. Neighborhood Center Subdistrict b. Locations Neighborhood Centers are located along major roadways and are distributed within Golden Gate Estates according to commercial demand estimates. (See Rural Golden Gate Estates Neighborhood Centers Map). The centers are designed to concentrate all new commercial zoning, and conditional uses, as allowed in the Estates Zoning District, in locations where traffic impacts can be readily accommodated and to avoid strip and disorganized patterns of commercial and conditional use development. Three Neighborhood Centers are established as follows: i. Wilson Boulevard and Golden Gate Boulevard Center. This center consists of three quadrants at the intersection of Wilson and Golden Gate Boulevards. (See Map 10). c. Criteria for land uses at the centers are as follows: ix. Building heights shall be limited to one (1) story, with a maximum height of thirty- five(35) feet. This provision only applies east of Collier Boulevard. xiii. No building footprint shall exceed 5,000 square feet, unless the project is submitted in the form of a PUD. Walkways or courtyards shall connect adjacent buildings. This provision only applies east of Collier Boulevard. xiv. Drive-through establishments shall be limited to banks, with no more than 3 lanes; the drive-through areas shall be architecturally integrated with the rest of the building. This provision only applies cast of Collier Boulevard. 4.Mission Subdistrict The Mission Subdistrict is located on the south side of Oil Well Road, approximately one- quarter mile west of Everglades Boulevard, and consists of 21.72 acres. The purpose of this Subdistrict is to provide for churches and related uses, including community outreach. The following uses are allowed: a. Churches. b. Child care centers — must be not-for-profit and affiliated with a church within the Subdistrict. c. Private schools — must be not-for-profit and affiliated with a church within the Subdistrict. d. Individual and family social services (activity centers, elderly or handicapped only; day care centers, adult and handicapped only)—must be not-for-profit and affiliated with a church within the Subdistrict. e. Medical outreach to the community, to include activities such as administering influenza vaccine, checking blood pressure, and conducting blood donation drives— must be not-for-profit and affiliated with a church within the Subdistrict. Soup kitchens and homeless shelters are prohibited in this Subdistrict. Words underlined are added,and words struck through are deleted as CCPC recommended adoption changes. GMPA-PL20180000261 Page 22 of 29 g The maximum total floor area allowed in this Subdistrict is 90,000 square feet. The maximum height of buildings shall be 30 feet zoned height, except the worship center shall be permitted a zoned height of 35 feet. Development in this Subdistrict shall be designed to be compatible with the existing, and allowed future, development in the surrounding area. B.Estates—Commercial District 1. Randall Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict The Randall Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict, containing approximately 56.5 acres, is located on the south side of Randall Boulevard and Immokalee Road(CR-846), extending from 8th Street NE west to the Corkscrew Canal. This Subdistrict is comprised of the following properties: Tracts 54, 55, 71, 72, 89, 90, 107, 108, 125, 126 and 127, Golden Gate Estates, Unit 23. This Subdistrict has been designated on the Rural Golden Gate Area Estates Future Land Use Map and the Randall Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict Map. It is the intent of this Subdistrict to provide commercial goods and services to the surrounding area. 2. Estates Shopping Center Subdistrict Recognizing the need to provide for centrally located basic goods and services within a portion Northern Golden Gate Estates,the Estates Shopping Center Subdistrict has been designated on the Rural Golden Gate Area Estates Future Land Use Map. 3. OVERLAYS AND SPECIAL FEATURES A. Southern Golden Gate Estates Natural Resource Protection Overlay Southern Golden Gate Estates is identified as a Natural Resource Protection Area(NRPA) Overlay on the Rural Golden Gate Avea Estates Future Land Use Map and is subject to the NRPA Overlay provisions of the FLUE. Map Series Changes Rural Golden Gate Estates Arca Future Land Use Map -new map to revise name and show future land uses only within the boundary of the Rural Golden Gate Estates. Rural Golden Gate Estates Neighborhood Centers -new map to revise name and remove the Urban Golden Gate Estates Neighborhood Center location outside the boundaries of the Rural Golden Gate Estates. Immokalee Road/Randall Blvd Planning Study Area—map revised to remove redundant titles. Words underlined are added,and words G.r. ugh are deleted as CCPC recommended adoption changes. GMPA-PL20180000261 Page 23 of 29 URBAN DESIGNATION ESTATES DESIGNATION AGRICULTURAL I RURAL DESIGNATION. I%ED USE DISTRICT NIXED USE DISTRICT O R rel Settlement as Meme ..a'..nR....nm'3wann. o tleattlenital Estates swa.lm --d.-ay Readmit, Conditional Uses .vin OVERLAYS AND SPECIAL FEATURES GOLDEN GATE AREA -.. rw.�cam..camm.rw'Sumtma saws mdrm.ro can.mw u.e�osanu Omen. ®nmrmnumsa may' �� .MERG DISTRICT of ��P 0R 'n,"a. O� FUTURE LAND USE MAP ", ,.. samm.a O , a na�w w mb -N„bnS.mm,n Santa Batten can ..'sada.ma -Evelaae..rtxue.Swamp .0. -Cad..ew.sra 'sums"' COMMERCIAL DISTRICT // "'.r.1:.'•�r'.�__'RD I— -rnr .QCs"n L.a Us / -ha RN2.Re.1.M Us sadism -Rams Bases Comm..sslsly Conmenssd,s5414rn Emus NM SulaSsnct ii,$ION an Om Eames El Comas .s..Snoop,Grins S .M - • ...•ONa swSovn NOTE: .In vnrRa.rra m..u.du[cTrvxe.xwc- -•Lena Lt.aaxsut'd or9crsrcw scru6WOD. Z oArt.anuMreR 0..w. 0 _ m 0 0 ........... cD W \ OIL 'ELL RD 7 CO CO v � F RANDALL BLVD fIMMOKALEE RD Z ° O • SUBJECT SITE(ADDITIONS) o CPSP-2018-2 0 VANDERBILT\ _. w ° ° BEACH RD - �� o Ow GOLDEN GATE BLVD I GOLDEN ATE BLVD '� 11 CD U PINE RIDGE RD n re GRE N WD CR z ---- m ° a = w m I— i I a z g ° W m ° Q.G.PKWY amp .kkitil RADIaRO INTERSTATE 75 INTERSTATE 75 F7—. j / DAVIS BLVD m j jA S.R.84 m j j Z K K m j m cc O O % / 1 Z 0 03 RATTLES AKE HAMMOCK RD 1— %i GOLDEN E !/ i FUTURE LAND USE MAP .. ,,,,,/r,. AMENDED DECEMBER 4,2007 ../ ADOPTED-FEBRARY,1991 .,./ ORD.NO.200]-) .../ AMENDED-MAV 19,1992 AMENDED.00TOBER 9)2008 � (ORD.NO.200&597 MENDED MAY 25.1993 AMENDED JULY AMENDED-JULY 2],1993 ORD.-0.2010-31 AMENDED JULY AMENDED- ' E OED APRIL 13,1991 ORD.NO.2010-32 o - AMENDED AMENDED SEPTEMBER tI.2011 E DED-MARCH t/,1995 ORD.NO.2011-29 AMENDED � E DEO- OCTOBER 27,1997 AMENDED NOVEMBER 18.2014 FE AMENDED-APRIL 14,1998 ORD.NO.2014-41 AMENDED-NOVEMBER 10,2015 / CO OJ AMENDED-SEPTEMBER 8,1998 AMENDED ONAYORD.N . t10 2018 '/ \ U AMENDED-FEBRUARY 23.1999 (ORD.NO.2018-12) AMENDED-MAY 9,2000 AMENDED NO. 017-23 01] / \ AMENDED-MARCH 13,2001 AMENDED-XXXXX O AMENDED-MAY 14,2002 (ORO.NO.x%%%1 AMENDED-SEPTEMBER 10,2003 / \ (ORD.NO.2003-441 , , .......... s. AMENDED-OCTOBER 26,2004 D 1 2 3 (ORD.NO.2004-71) � Miles AMENDED-NNU 005-3)1005 / /j 'clamsmncnv-mruc nuow.us (ORD.0.2003-3) AMENDED-JANUARY 25,2007 j j \ wI e R 26 E ORD.-0.209)-19) R 27 E , R 28 E I R 29 E ESTATES DESIGNATION AGRICULTURAL I RURAL DESIGNATION NIXED USE DISTRICT O Rai Swmmaa wea Owe o...num Ewes sumo Conditional Uses Sublalnd OVERLAYS AND SPECIAL FEATURES RURAL GOLDEN GATE ESTATES oNapla,padCanter eut we ®R o B�,aw,naD.Nara, IIII D�anSuRdauapara. FUTURE LAND USE MAP —E. Suaaci COMMERCIAL DISTRICT N 11111ve Rsna Boa.Cameral Samh i♦Estates Shopping Camarsmmma IMMOKALEE RD .7 F- 1111 A..aRBB.. uLe TEnwn.,TtEBo..OBJECT.Es...C.wlUSEpamr.m.DESORP.lmlaaaa.OrT.403. / \ \ z m W W OIL WELL RD 7 CO H { m RANDAEL BLVD IMMOKALEE RD '`-'� 1111111111 Q g w m O 3 y1 p I o ! VABEANDAHRBILTRD VANDERBILT ->' _----J 1 BEACH RD w \ m L OU GOLDEN GATE BLVD GOLDEN GATE BLVD \I rn ri U I PINE RIDGE RD A fW� 1 m i Z GREEN BLVDr __J m rn O'53 u — 71 GIG.PKW\......: 1 1 RADI p • INTERSTATE 75 INTERSTATE 75 j j j j / DAVIS BLVD y j .R.84 a U m j Z U j RATTLESNAKE HF MMOCK RDCO o LO RURAL GOLDEN GATE .0 FUTURE LAND USE MAP ADOPTED-XX%X,2019 .// 7 O 1 4 A 1 ,,, ',......._ O 0.5 1 O2 3 -->��Miles / i DEPT [ILERURAL...ENCA,STATES FLYR.P,aD 1 R26E I R27E I R28E I R29E GOLDEN GATE ESTATES NEIGHBORHOOD CENTERS -...„ Collier County, Florida IMMOKALEE ROAD / / CO I OIL ' LL ROAD IMMOKALEE ROAD 1 0 J Op maN W u Q Z 0 O_ J_ W GOLDEN GATE BOULEVARD :III ❑ WHITE BLVD. 0 J m a' W J J 0 U INTERSTATE — 75 AMENDED — SEPTEMBER 10, 2003 (Ord. No. 2003-44) AMENDED — OCTOBER 26, 2004 (Ord. No. 2004-71) AMENDED — JANUARY 25, 2007 Gana cele ESTA (Ord. No. 2007-19) GOLDEN NEIGHBORHOOD CEN S 0 1 MI 2 MI AMENDED — OCTOBER 14, 2008 LEGEND (Ord. No. 2008-59) P' PARED BY: GIS/CAD MAPPING SECTION AMENDED — SEPTEMBER 14, 2011 NEIGHBORHOOD CENTERS •.MMUNI�TYp DEVELOPMENT yAy�NND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION (Ord. No. 2011-29) LE: CUGM5/71SL�Bgg188i>QUUG61 DATE: 9/2011 rage 2b O1 29 RURAL GOLDEN GATE ESTATES NEIGHBORHOOD CENTERS Collier County, Florida IMMOKALEE RD 1 z co W OIL WELL RD a NV LL W > Lu IMMOKALEE RD z a Z J a J 0 Lu 0 Z Lu W VAND=RRII T B A H R PYT Lu a -JJ_ GOLDEN GATE BLVD W / VP/ Lu o o > > - m o m Lu f2 W CO O W Q O 0 W 0 a LU INTERSTATE-75 N AMENDED-SEPTEMBER 10,2003 (Ord.No.2003-44) AMENDED-OCTOBER 26,2004 NEIGHBORHOOD CENTERS (Ord.No.2004-71) LEGEND AMENDED-JANUARY 25,2007 RURAL GOLDEN GATE ESTATES 0 0.5 1 2 3 (Ord.No.2007-19) 77�R RAL GOLDEN GATE ESTATES Miles AMENDED-OCTOBER 14,2008 / NEICHaoREGEG CENTERS PREPARED BY:BETH YANG,AICP (Ord.No.2008-59) GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT AMENDED-SEPTEMBER 14,2011 FILE:Golden Gate Estates Neighborhood Centers.mxd (Ord.No.2011-29) DATE:07/2019 GMPA-PL20180000261 Page 27 of 29 w 37th AVE NE `Chesapeake Bay CT' Ocean Bluff CT 1/ Nri I 1 f� NW , 35th AVE NE 33rd AVE NE .►I.I►.. ' i � `i OIL WELL RD \ i■ i 171 0 nge ' ■ w w ■ e Y D ` O J w4 DO Z .►1.u.o 2 i z — - Z ~ ■ 1- -0 o —_ J NI _ > — j N > _. Randall Blvd Commercial -ubdistrict ,w�� if 25t AVE NE ►►j likk ` RANDALL BLVD vo IMMOK-ALE ��� ��...� ��-��__� � IM 24th AVE NE 0 N A //I W 20th AVE NE 20th AVE NE GMPA PL20180000261 Page 28 of 29 IMMOKALEE ROAD/RANDALL BLVD PLANNING STUAREA _ OceanDY Bluff CT III NW LEGEND g►mni IMMOKALEE RD/RANDALL BLVD PLANNING STUDY AREA RESIDENTIAL ESTATES SUBDISTRICT N RANDALL BLVD COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT A RURAL SETTLEMENT AREA SUBDISTRICT rum 0 500 ,000 2,000 3,000 j Feet OIL WELL RD PREPARED BY:BETH YANG.AICP GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT ,-►► i . FILE:Imm Randal Study Area.mxd I DATE O712019 Y I ii Ora W ■ J i 40 i Q Y 13 p i Q UJ LU i 2 m z z n�nmi ■ z z F- UI 10 0 CV -o J CV I 1 1 ii 25th AVE NE i i d►.►! I IMMOKALEE R� Ji i RANDALL BLVD J m 24th AVE NE z 0 cn J_ ADOPTED-XXXXX,2019 (Ord.No.XXXX-XX) `/ • -- - ..-. . 711+4. A\IC A I C GMPA-PL20180000261 Page 29 of 29 EXHIBIT "A" COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN ELEMENT Prepared by Collier County Zoning Division Prepared for COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Adopted (date) The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 1 of 9 Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element AMENDMENTS TO COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN - prior to 2019 -� GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN DATE AMENDED ORDINANCE NO. May 9, 2000 2000-25 ** May 9, 2000 2000-26 *** May 9, 2000 2000-27 May 9, 2000 2000-28 May 9, 2000 2000-29 March 13, 2001 2001-12 May 14, 2002 2002-24 September 10, 2003 2003-44 December 16, 2003 2003-67 October 26, 2004 2004-71 June 7, 2005 2005-25 January 25, 2007 2007-19 December 4, 2007 2007-76 December 4, 2007 2007-77 December 4, 2007 2007-83 October 14, 2008 2008-55 October 14, 2008 2008-56 October 14, 2008 2008-59 July 28, 2010 2010-31 .� July 28, 2010 2010-32 September 14, 2011 2011-29 January 9, 2013 2013-15 November 18, 2014 2014-41 November 10, 2015 2015-62 May 10, 2016 2016-12 June 13, 2017 2017-23 * Indicates adopted portions ** Ordinance No. 2000-25 rescinded and repealed in its entirety Collier County Ordinance No. 99-63, which had the effect of rescinding certain EAR-based (1996 EAR) objectives and policies at issue in Administration Commission Case No. ACC-99-02 (DOAH Case No. 98-0324GM). *** Ordinance No. 2000-26 amended Ordinance No. 89-05, as amended, the Collier County Growth Management Plan, having the effect of rescinding certain EAR-based (1996 EAR) objectives and policies at issue in Administration Commission Case No. ACC-99-02 (DOAH Case No. 98-0324GM), more specifically portions of the Intergovernmental Coordination Element (Ord. No. 98-56), Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge (Ord. No. 97-59) and Drainage (Ord. No. 97-61) sub-elements of the Public Facilities Element, Housing Element (Ord. No. 97-63), Golden Gate Area Master Plan (Ord. No. 97-64), Conservation and Coastal Management Element (Ord. No. 97-66), and the Future Land ii The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 2 of 9 Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element Use Element and Future Land Use Map (Ord. No. 97-67); and readopting Policy 2.2.3 of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan. • The above Ordinance No. 2007-19 is based on the 2004 Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR). • The above Ordinance No. 2013-15 is based on the 2011 Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR). AMENDMENTS TO COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN — prior to 2000 GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN DATE AMENDED ORDINANCE NO. May 19, 1992 92-34 August 4, 1992 92-50 May 25, 1993 93-24 April 12, 1994 94-22 March 14, 1995 95-12 April 14, 1998 98-26 September 8, 1998 98-70 February 23, 1999 99-17 Note: All of the above amendments occurred after adoption of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan in 1991 (Ord. No. 91-15) and prior to adoption of amendments on , 2019. Due to the restructuring of this Element in 2019 to create three Sub-Elements, these amendments are no longer denoted on the pages of the Element with Roman numeral symbols that provide informational citations to adopted documents recorded in the Official Records of Collier County. The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 3 of 9 Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. INTRODUCTION 1 II. OVERVIEW 2 A. County-Wide Planning Process B. Golden Gate Area Planning Process Ill. MAPS _Golden Gate Area Master Plan Study Areas 4 iv The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 4 of 9 Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element I. INTRODUCTION As part of the revised Growth Management Plan, the County adopted the original Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) in 1991. The GGAMP was further revised in 1997. The Golden Gate Area Master Plan provides growth management regulations for the designated Golden Gate Area as shown on the Golden Gate Area Master Plan Study Areas Map. The Golden Gate Area was previously subject to the regulations outlined in the County's Future Land Use Element (FLUE). However, in 1991, the unique characteristics of the area resulted in adoption of a Master Plan for Golden Gate, as a separate Element of the Collier County Growth Management Plan. This Master Plan superseded former Objective 1, Policy 1.1, and Policy 1.3 of the FLUE. All other Goals, Objectives, and Policies contained in the FLUE and all other Elements of the Growth Management Plan remain applicable to the Golden Gate Area. In addition, the Golden Gate Area Future Land Use Map will be used instead of the County-Wide Future Land Use Map. In April 1996, the Board of County Commissioners adopted the Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) for Collier County. As a result of the recommendations made in the EAR, Ordinance 91- 15,which adopted the original Golden Gate Area Master Plan,was repealed and a new Ordinance 97-64 was adopted. In February of 2001, the Board of County Commissioners directed staff to initiate a restudy of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan. Accordingly, in June of 2001, Comprehensive Planning Section Staff requested that the Board appoint an advisory committee, consisting of residents of Golden Gate City and Golden Gate Estates, to aid Staff in the restudy process. The Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy Committee met on over twenty (20) occasions, between June 2001 and June 2003, to consider proposed amendments to the GGAMP, as well as other matters related to the Golden Gate Area. All meetings were open to the public; many of these meetings were well attended. The restudy process was divided into two phases. The County transmitted Phase I amendments to the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA) in April 2003. These amendments were adopted, as Ordinance 2003-44, in September 2003. Phase II amendments were transmitted in June 2004. The Phase II amendments were adopted in October 2004, as Ordinance 2004-71. In February 2015, the Board of County Commissioners directed staff to initiate another restudy of the GGAMP. Staff evaluated the Golden Gate Area within 3 distinct areas: 1) Golden Gate City; 2) Rural Golden Gate Estates, defined as Golden Gate_Estates east of Collier Boulevard; and 3) Urban Golden Gate Estates, defined as Golden Gate Estates west of Collier Boulevard. Guided by an Oversight Committee, staff conducted eight public workshops along with electronic outreach to gather resident and stakeholder opinions. Most fundamentally, the vision statements created by consensus within the sub-areas of the Golden Gate Area are as follows: Golden Gate City Vision Statement: Golden Gate City is a safe, diverse, family-oriented community that offers easy access to education, parks, shopping and services within a vibrant, walkable community. 1 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 5 of 9 Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element Rural Golden Gate Estates Vision Statement: The Rural Golden Gate Estates is an interconnected, low-density residential community with limited goods and services in neighborhood centers, defined by rural character with appreciation for nature and quiet surroundings. Urban Golden Gate Estates Vision Statement: Urban Golden Gate Estates is a low-density, large-lot residential neighborhood in a natural setting with convenient access to the coastal area. Implementation strategies have been developed to address land use, public facilities, transportation, rural character, emergency management and natural resources. The Goals, Objectives, and Policies, Land Use Designation Descriptions and Maps are implemented as separate sub-elements for three distinct areas: 1. Golden Gate City Master Plan Sub-Element; 2. Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element; and 3. Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element. JREMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] --e 2 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 6 of 9 Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element II. OVERVIEW A. COUNTY-WIDE PLANNING PROCESS Pursuant to Section 163.3177(6), Florida Statutes, the Collier County Growth Management Plan shall contain the following elements: 1. Future Land Use 2. Housing 3. Public Facilities 4. Conservation and Coastal Management (Coastal Counties only) 5. Intergovernmental Coordination 6. Capital Improvements 7. Transportation 8. Recreation and Open Space In addition to the above Elements, local government comprehensive plans in Florida may, by decision of the local legislative body, contain one or more optional elements. Optional elements are required to comply with certain general criteria under Section 163.3177, Florida Statutes, but are not subject to specific requirements (with some exceptions). In 1991, the Board of County Commissioners chose the option of adopting the Golden Gate Area Master Plan, in recognition of the unique characteristics of the Golden Gate Area. In addition to establishing the Collier County Growth Management Plan's mandatory structure, Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, also subjects the Plan to a mandatory evaluation process every seven (7) years. This process involves the preparation of an Evaluation and Appraisal Review (EAR) to determine whether, and to what extent, the existing Growth Management Plan has carried out its stated Goals, Objectives and Policies. B. GOLDEN GATE AREA PLANNING PROCESS Objective 4 of the Collier County Future Land Use Element (FLUE) allows the countywide planning process to "address specific geographic or issue areas." Policy 4.1 of this Objective reads as follows: "A detailed Master Plan for Golden Gate Estates has been developed and was incorporated into this Growth Management Plan in February 1991. The Master Plan addresses Natural Resources, Future Land Use,Water Management, Public Facilities and other considerations." In February 1991, the Board of County Commissioners adopted the original Golden Gate Area Master Plan. The original Master Plan incorporated the recommendations of a Citizens Steering Committee. A revised and updated Master Plan was adopted in 1997, pursuant to recommendations of the County's 1996 Evaluation and Appraisal Report. In 2001, the Board of County Commissioners established the Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy Committee and directed Staff to work with the Committee to further revise and update the Master Plan. The Board of County Commissioners adopted revisions to the GGAMP, incorporating the recommendations of the Restudy Committee, in 2003 and 2004. .�� 3 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 7 of 9 Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element III. Maps _Golden Gate Area Master Plan Study Areas 4 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 8 of 9 GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN STUDY AREA COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA SR 8? LEGEND G, = gl • ••4 Golden Gate City m "FA, 772 Urban Golden Gate Estates OAKE TRAFFO D RD 9'Q.�� \ Rural Golden Gate Estates rR LAKE o� TRAFFORD F rn 'in m IMMOKALEE RD / 1111144 BO ITA BEACH RD \ ❑ l!tw o� ` .. ���\\ � � � \`� ' L jN Ir IMMOKALEE RD \ NV; ce cN ¢ v DE •ILT- AC ,'JA, S AGA 4 / \\\\\\\� �` 41.4 ss.......— 8 z z w C p•....,.... � IN F F a //�/ INTERSTATE-75 / J ��� CITY � ❑ OF ,1 DAVIS BLVD > NAPLES } I W -,‘"..1o r. o o C0 o o o lliiit b //}�� AMENDED-OCTOBER 26,2004 •)`',eff v 7 (Ord.No.2004-71) 8 AMENDED-OCTOBER 14,2008 t A C ( Ord.N.2008-59) 4 F lJ 2 4110 ' ISLAND l . ,r - N �. 0 1 2 4 6 1, - \ALI :114iiggrn Miles 6 a ' PREPARED BV'.BETH YANG.AICP �� Q GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT 4fi-s-� - K FILE:Golden Gate Area Master Plan Areas nod DATE - 'a 9 of 9 1�1PA PL20180000261 08/15/2019 n Golden Gate City Sub-Element "Exhibit A" GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN GOLDEN GATE CITY SUB-ELEMENT Prepared by Collier County Zoning Division Prepared for COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Adopted (date) The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 1 of 21 Golden Gate City Sub-Element AMENDMENTS TO COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN: GOLDEN GATE CITY SUB-ELEMENT DATE AMENDED ORDINANCE NO. (date), 2019 2019-(#) ii The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 2 of 21 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page A. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES 1 B. LAND USE DESIGNATION DESCRIPTION SECTION 6 1. URBAN DESIGNATION A. Urban — Mixed Use District 7 1. Urban Residential Subdistrict 2. High Density Residential Subdistrict 3. Downtown Center Commercial Subdistrict B. Urban — Commercial District 9 1. Mixed Use Activity Center Subdistrict 2. Golden Gate Urban Commercial Infill Subdistrict 3. Santa Barbara Commercial Subdistrict 4. Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict C. LIST OF MAPS 11 Golden Gate City Future Land Use Map High Density Residential Subdistrict 1989 Boundaries of Activity Centers Downtown Center Commercial Subdistrict Urban Mixed Use Activity Centers Golden Gate Parkway and Coronado Parkway Golden Gate City Urban Commercial Infill Subdistrict Santa Barbara Commercial Subdistrict Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 3 of 21 Golden Gate City Sub-Element A. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES GOAL 1: TO GUIDE LAND USE AND PUBLIC FACILITY DECISION MAKING AND TO BALANCE THE NEED TO PROVIDE BASIC SERVICES WITH NATURAL RESOURCE CONCERNS THROUGH A WELL PLANNED MIX OF COMPATIBLE LAND USES WHICH ENSURE THE HEALTH, SAFETY, WELFARE, AND QUALITY OF LIFE OF THE LOCAL RESIDENTS. OBJECTIVE 1.1: Develop new or revised uses of land consistent with designations outlined on the Golden Gate City Future Land Use Map and provisions found in the Land Use Designation Description Section of this Element. Policy 1.1.1: The Policies under the above Objective shall identify the Future Land Use Designations, Districts, and Subdistricts for Golden Gate City. Policy 1.1.2: The Land Use Designation Description Section of this Element shall provide the standards and permitted uses for Golden Gate City Future Land Use Districts and Subdistricts. Policy 1.1.3: The Golden Gate City Future Land Use Map and companion Future Land Use Designations, Districts, and Subdistricts shall be binding on all development orders unless otherwise permitted in this Master Plan effective with the adoption of this Master Plan. Policy 1.1.4: The URBAN Future Land Use Designation shall include Future Land Use Districts and Subdistricts for: A. URBAN — MIXED USE DISTRICT 1. Urban Residential Subdistrict 2. High Density Residential Subdistrict 3. Downtown Center Commercial Subdistrict B. URBAN —COMMERCIAL DISTRICT 1. Mixed Use Activity Center Subdistrict 2. Golden Gate Urban Commercial Infill Subdistrict 3. Santa Barbara Commercial Subdistrict 4. Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict Policy 1.1.5: No development orders shall be issued inconsistent with the Golden Gate City Sub-Element with the exception of those unimproved properties granted a positive determination through the Zoning Re-evaluation Program and identified on the Future Land Use Map Series as properties consistent by Policy and those development orders issued pursuant to conditional uses and rezones approved based on the County-Wide Future Land Use Element (adopted January 10, 1989, Ordinance 89-05)which was in effect at the time of approval. Any subsequent development orders shall also be reviewed for consistency with the Growth Management Plan based on the County-Wide Future Land Use Element. The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 4 of 21 Policy 1.1.6: The sites containing existing public educational plants and ancillary plants, and the undeveloped sites owned by the Collier County School Board for future public educational plants and ancillary plants, within the GGAMP area, are depicted on the Future Land Use Map Series in the countywide FLUE and on the Public School Facilities Element Map Series, and referenced in FLUE Policy 5.14 and Intergovernmental Coordination Element Policy 1.2.6. All of these sites are subject to the general Interlocal Agreement, adopted on May 15, 2003 by the Collier County School Board and on May 27, 2003 by the Board of County Commissioners, and as subsequently amended and restated, with an effective date of December 2008, and subject to the implementing land development regulations to be adopted. OBJECTIVE 1.2: Ensure public facilities are provided at an acceptable level of service. Policy 1.2.1: Requests for new uses of land shall be subject to level of service standards and concurrency requirements for public facilities as outlined in the Capital Improvement Element of the Growth Management Plan. OBJECTIVE 1.3: Protect and preserve the valuable natural resources within Golden Gate City. Policy 1.3.1: The County shall protect and preserve natural resources within Golden Gate City in accordance with the Objectives and Policies contained within Goals 6 and 7 of the Collier County Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME). Policy 1.3.2: Collier County shall coordinate its planning and permitting activities within Golden Gate City_with all other applicable environmental planning, permitting and regulatory agencies to ensure that all Federal, State and local natural resource protection regulations are being enforced. OBJECTIVE 1.4: Provide a living environment within Golden Gate City, which is aesthetically acceptable and protects the quality of life. Policy 1.4.1: Collier County shall provide a living environment that is aesthetically acceptable and protects the quality of life through the enforcement of applicable codes and laws. Policy 1.4.2: The County's Code Enforcement Board shall strictly enforce the Land Development Code and other applicable codes and laws to control the illegal storage of machinery, vehicles and junk, and the illegal operation of commercial activities within Golden Gate City. GOAL 2: TO PRESERVE AND ENHANCE A MIX OF RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL LAND USES WITHIN GOLDEN GATE CITY THAT CREATES A SAFE, DIVERSE AND VIBRANT WALKABLE COMMUNTY CONSISTENT WITH THE STATED VISION OF GOLDEN GATE CITY. 2 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 5 of 21 OBJECTIVE 2.1: Provide for residential and commercial land uses that meet the needs of Golden Gate City and the surrounding area. Policy 2.1.1: Development and redevelopment within Golden Gate City shall be guided by the residential and commercial needs consistent with the stated vision of Golden Gate City. Policy 2.1.2: The County shall protect established stable neighborhoods and provide opportunity for redevelopment and renewal through development standards and practices that promote compatibility. Policy 2.1.3 Within two years, Collier County shall create development standards to guide the transformation of Golden Gate Parkway and the Activity Center into destinations that are convenient, pleasant and safe for pedestrians and cyclists, and maintain strong connections to transit service. Policy 2.1.4 The Activity Center shall allow uses intended to strengthen the economic health of Golden Gate City. Policy 2.1.5 Collier County shall discourage new land uses along Golden Gate Parkway and within the Activity Center that impede pedestrian activity and are solely auto-oriented, such as car washes, storage facilities, auto dealerships and drive throughs. Land development regulations will be initiated within two years to ensure compatibility of auto-oriented uses within the pedestrian environment. Policy 2.1.6 Residential land use designations shall support the diversity of housing types within Golden Gate City. Policy 2.1.7: Collier County shall respond to community-initiated planning programs as they may occur. Community planning programs may take into consideration the following issues: A. Affordable housing based upon home ownership; B. Commercial re-vitalization, to include: i. Sidewalks ii. Traffic calming measures iii. Improved street lighting; C. Neighborhood parks, open space and recreational centers; D. Crime reduction; E. Consistent enforcement of land development regulations; and, F. Improved lighting for streets and parking areas. OBJECTIVE 2.2: Strengthen the quality of life in Golden Gate City and the surrounding area, and promote a healthy economy through support of redevelopment and renewal in Golden Gate City with focus along Golden Gate Parkway and within the designated Activity Center. 3 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 6 of 21 Policy 2.2.1 Collier County shall consider the use of redevelopment tools such as tax increment financing. Policy 2.2.2 Within two years of adoption, Collier County shall initiate a community renewal plan to include economic development strategies, urban design schemes, and infrastructure improvements. Renewal plans shall be in concert with the vision of Golden Gate City and promote vibrant urbanism, improve aesthetics and support walkability. Policy 2.2.3 Within two years of adoption, Collier County shall initiate the involvement of Golden Gate City residents and business owners to consider amendments to the Land Development Code to support and implement residential and commercial redevelopment and renewal initiatives. Amendments shall include incentives for remodeling and renovation by creating criteria and standards for variances and/or deviations. Policy 2.2.4 In collaboration with the Golden Gate City residents and business owners, and other community partners such as the Greater Naples Chamber of Commerce, Collier County shall initiate a branding and marketing plan for Golden Gate City within two years of adoption. The proposed plan shall be in concert with the overall vision for Golden Gate City. Policy 2.2.5 Collier County will work to ensure pertinent economic incentive programs are made available to those seeking business creation and redevelopment opportunities. OBJECTIVE 2.3 Ensure Golden Gate City public facilities are provided at an acceptable level of service, planned and implemented in concert with the vision of Golden Gate City. Policy 2.3.1 Due to the continued use of individual septic systems and private wells within a densely platted urban area, Collier County Public Utilities will expand sewer and water service in accordance with the Implementation Report attached as Appendix A to Resolution No. 2017-222. Expansion plans shall consider the renewal areas of Golden Gate Parkway and the area surrounding the Activity Center a priority for expansion and shall coordinate its projects with scheduled road and/or stormwater improvements to maximize efficiency and minimize disruption to businesses and residents. Policy 2.3.2 Collier County will support all transportation needs within Golden Gate City with an emphasis on walkability. Walkability will be improved through the implementation of the recommendations of the Metropolitan Planning Organization's Walkability Study. Policy 2.3.3 Redevelopment within the Activity Center shall maintain multiple access points to the surrounding neighborhoods and through the Activity Center while providing safe and direct access to transit stops within or adjacent to the Activity Center. 4 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 7 of 21 Policy 2.3.4 Alleys in Golden Gate City may only be vacated if such vacation does not prevent reasonable connection and continuity for future pedestrian, non-motorized and transit trips. Within one year of adoption, Resolution 2013-166 shall be amended to implement this policy. Policy 2.3.5 To ensure a safe and pleasant pedestrian environment, Collier County shall periodically conduct speed studies in Golden Gate City. When appropriate, traffic calming measures and speed limit reductions may be implemented. JREMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK1 5 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 8 of 21 B. LAND USE DESIGNATION DESCRIPTION SECTION The following section describes the three land use designations shown on the Golden Gate City Future Land Use Map. These designations generally indicate the types of land uses for which zoning may be requested. However, these land use designations do not guarantee that a zoning request will be approved. Requests may be denied by the Board of County Commissioners based on criteria in the Land Development Code or in special studies completed for the County. 1. URBAN DESIGNATION: URBAN MIXED-USE DISTRICT AND URBAN COMMERCIAL DISTRICT Urban Designated Areas on the Future Land Use Map include two general portions of Collier County: areas with the greatest residential densities and areas in close proximity, which have or are projected to receive future urban support facilities and services. It is intended that Urban Designated areas accommodate the majority of population growth and that new intensive land uses be located within them. The boundaries of the Urban Designated areas have been established based on several factors including: • patterns of existing development, • patterns of approved but unbuilt development, • natural resources, water management, and hurricane risk, • existing and proposed public facilities, • population projections, and • land needed to accommodate growth. The Urban Designation will also accommodate future non-residential uses including essential �.. services as defined by the most recently adopted Collier County Land Development Code. Other permitted non-residential land uses may include: a. parks, open space and recreational use; b. water-dependent and water-related uses; c. child care centers; d. community facilities such as _churches, cemeteries, schools, and school facilities co- located with other public facilities such as parks, libraries, and community centers, where feasible and mutually acceptable, fire and police stations; e. utility and communication facilities. f. support medical facilities such as physician's offices, medical clinics, treatment, research and rehabilitative centers and pharmacies(as long as the dominant use is medical related) may also be permitted provided they are granted concurrent with or located within 1/4 mile of existing or approved hospitals or medical centers which offer primary and urgent care treatment for all types of injuries and traumas_. Stipulations to ensure that the construction of such support medical facilities is concurrent with hospitals or such medical centers shall be determined at the time of zoning approval. Group Housing shall be permitted within the Urban Mixed-Use District and Urban Commercial Districts subject to the definitions and regulations as outlined in the Collier County Land Development Code (Ordinance No. 04-41, as amended) and consistent with locational requirements in Florida Statutes (Chapter 419.001 F.S.). 6 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 9 of 21 Group Housing includes the following type facilities: ..� a. Family Care Facility if occupied by not more than six (6) persons shall be permitted in residential areas. b. Group Care Facility, c. Care Units, d. Adult Congregate Living Facilities, and e. Nursing Homes. A. Urban-Mixed Use District This district is intended to accommodate a variety of residential and commercial land uses including single-family, multi-family, duplex, and mixed use (Planned Unit Development). 1. Urban Residential Subdistrict All land within the urban mixed-use designation is zoned and platted. However, any parcel to be rezoned residential is subject to and must be consistent with the Density Rating System. DENSITY RATING SYSTEM: a. BASE DENSITY— Four (4) residential units per gross acre is the eligible density, though not an entitlement. b. DENSITY BONUSES — Density bonuses are discretionary, not entitlements, and are dependent upon meeting the criteria for each bonus provision and compatibility with surrounding properties, as well as the rezone criteria in the Land Development Code. The following densities per gross acre may be added to the base density. In no case shall the maximum permitted density exceed 16 residential dwelling units per gross acre. i. Conversion of Commercial Zoning Bonus --� • 16 dwelling units — If a project includes the conversion of commercial zoning that has been found to be"Consistent By Policy"through the Collier County Zoning Re- evaluation Program (Ordinance No. 90-23), then a bonus of up to 16 dwelling units per acre may be added for every one (1) acre of commercial zoning that is converted to residential zoning. These dwelling units may be distributed over the entire project. ii. Proximity to Activity Center • 3 dwelling units -Within 1 mile of Activity Center iii. Affordable Housing Bonus To encourage the provision of affordable housing within certain Districts and Subdistricts in the Urban Designated Area, a maximum of up to 12 residential units per gross acre may be added to the base density if the project meets the requirements of the Affordable Housing Density Bonus Ordinance (Section 2.06.00 of the Land Development Code, Ordinance No. 04-41, as amended) and if the affordable housing units are targeted for families earning no greater than 140% of the median income for Collier County. iv. Residential In-fill If the project is 10 acres or less in size; located within an area with central public water and sewer service; compatible with surrounding land uses; has no common site development plan with adjoining property; no common ownership with any adjacent parcels; and the parcel in question was not created to take advantage of the in-fill residential density. 7 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 10 of 21 • 3 dwelling units v. Roadway Access Density credits based on future roadways will be awarded if the developer commits to construct a portion of the roadway (as determined by the County) or the road is scheduled for completion during the first five years of the Capital Improvement Schedule. • Add 1 dwelling unit - if direct access to two or more arterial or collector roads as identified in the Transportation Element. c. There are Density Bands located around Activity Centers. The density band around an Activity Center shall be measured by the radial distance from the center of the intersection around which the Activity Center is situated. If 50% or more of a project is within the density band, the additional density applies to the entire project. Density bands shall not apply within the Estates Designation. 2. High Density Residential Subdistrict: To encourage higher density residential and promote mixed uses in close proximity to Activity Centers, those residential zoned properties permitting up to 12 dwelling units per acre which were located within and consistent with the Activity Center designation at Golden Gate Parkway and Coronado Parkway established by the 1989 Collier County Growth Management Plan and subsequently removed by the creation of a new Activity Center via the adoption of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan are recognized as being consistent with this Master Plan and are outlined on the High Density Residential Subdistrict Map. 3. Downtown Center Commercial Subdistrict: The primary purpose of the Downtown Center Commercial Subdistrict (see Downtown Center Commercial Subdistrict Map) is to encourage redevelopment along Golden Gate Parkway in order to improve the physical appearance of the area and create a vibrant and viable downtown district within Golden Gate City. Emphasis shall be placed on the creation of a pedestrian-oriented boulevard. The provisions of this Subdistrict are intended to ensure harmonious development of • commercial and mixed-use buildings at a pedestrian scale that are compatible with residential development within and outside of the Subdistrict. The Subdistrict allows the aggregation of properties in order to promote flexibility in site design. The types of uses permitted within this Subdistrict are low intensity retail, office, personal services, institutional, and residential. Non-residential development is intended to serve the needs of residents within the Subdistrict, surrounding neighborhoods, and passersby. a. All development or redevelopment within the boundaries of the Downtown Center Commercial Subdistrict shall include: i. Provisions for bicycle and pedestrian travel. ii. An emphasis on building aesthetics. ii. Emphasis on the orderly circulation of vehicular, bicycle and pedestrian traffic. iii. Provision for broad sidewalks. iv. Enhanced streetscaping. v. Project interconnections, where possible and feasible. vi. Quality designs for building façades, including lighting, uniform signage and landscaping. 8 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 11 of 21 b. Permitted uses within this Subdistrict shall include only the following, except as may be restricted in an implementing zoning overlay district, and except as may be prohibited in Paragraph D, below: i. Those uses permitted by right within the C-1, C-2 and C-3 Zoning Districts, as outlined in the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC); ii. Residential uses permitted by right in the existing residential zoning districts in this Subdistrict; iii. Those permitted uses that may be allowed in an implementing zoning overlay district. c. Conditional uses allowed by this Subdistrict shall include only: i. Those conditional uses allowed within the C-1, C-2 and C-3 Zoning Districts, as outlined in the LDC; ii. Those conditional uses allowed, by the LDC, within existing residential Zoning Districts in this Subdistrict; iii. Those conditional uses that may be allowed in an implementing zoning overlay district; and, d. Prohibited uses in this Subdistrict are as follows: i. Automatic food and drink vending machines located exterior to a building. ii. Any commercial use employing drive-up, drive-in or drive-through delivery of goods or services. iii. Enameling, painting or plating as a primary use. However, these uses are permitted if secondary to an artist's or craft studio. iv. Single-room occupancy hotels, prisons, detention facilities, halfway houses, soup kitchens or homeless shelters. v. Uses as may be prohibited in an implementing zoning overlay district. B. Urban Commercial District 1. Mixed Use Activity Center Subdistrict The Activity Center designated on the Future Land Use Map is intended to accommodate commercial zoning within the Urban Designated Area. Activity Centers are intended to be mixed-use (commercial, residential, institutional) in character. The Activity Center concept is designed to concentrate new and existing commercial zoning in locations where traffic impacts can readily be accommodated, to avoid strip and disorganized patterns of commercial development, and to create focal points within the community. The size and configuration of the Activity Center is outlined on the Urban Mixed-Use Activity Center—Golden Gate Parkway and Coronado Parkway Map. The standard for intensity of commercial uses allowed within each Activity Center is the full array of uses allowed in the C-1 through C-5 Zoning Districts, as identified in the Land Development Code (Ordinance No. 04-41, as amended) excluding the following new commercial uses: Hotels and motels that locate within an Activity Center will be allowed to develop at a density consistent with the Land Development Code. Residential density for residential projects located within the boundaries of the Mixed-Use Activity Center shall be allowed to develop at a density of up to 22 residential units per gross acre. This density may be distributed throughout the project, including any portion located outside of the boundary of the Mixed- Use Activity Center. 9 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 12 of 21 Certain uses specifically intended to support economic development in Golden Gate City are allowed within the Mixed Use Activity Center. The following uses, are allowed as will be provided for in the Golden Gate Parkway Overlay District (zoning overlay). The Overlay District will include standards to address compatibility and building scale. a. Advanced manufacturing, including automated apparel_, light assembly_ and 3D printing_; b. Call centers_; c. Software development and programming_; d. Internet technologies and electronic commerce_; e. Data and information processing_; f. Professional services that are export based such as laboratory research or testing activities_; g. Other uses as may be determined by the Board of County Commissioners consistent with the intent of supporting economic development in Golden Gate City. 2. Golden Gate City Urban Commercial In-fill Subdistrict This Subdistrict is located at the southwest quadrant of C.R. 951 and Golden Gate Parkway. Due to the existing zoning and land use pattern in proximity to the Commercial In-fill Subdistrict(see Golden Gate City Urban Commercial Infill Subdistrict) and the need to ensure adequate development standards to buffer adjacent land uses, commercial uses shall be permitted under the following criteria: a. Commercial uses shall be limited to: i. Low intensity commercial uses that are compatible with both residential and intermediate commercial uses, in order to provide for small scale shopping and personal needs, and ii. Intermediate commercial to provide for a wider variety of goods and services in areas that have a higher degree of automobile traffic. These uses shall be similar to C-1, C-2, or C-3 zoning districts outlined in the Collier County Land Development Code (Ordinance 91-102), adopted October 30, 1991. b. Rezones shall be encouraged in the form of a Planned Unit Development (there shall be no minimum acreage requirement for PUD rezones except for the requirement that all requests for rezoning must be at least forty thousand (40,000) square feet in area unless the proposed rezone is an extension of an existing zoning district consistent with the Golden Gate Area Master Plan); c. Projects within this Subdistrict shall make provisions for shared parking arrangements with adjoining commercial developments when appropriate; d. Driveways and curb cuts for projects within this Subdistrict shall be consolidated with adjoining commercial developments; and e. Access to projects shall not be permitted from Collier Boulevard. 3. Santa Barbara Commercial Subdistrict The boundaries of the Subdistrict are hereby expanded to include the former Commercial Subdistrict and also to extend approximately one (1) block to the east of the former boundary (see Santa Barbara Commercial Subdistrict Map). The intent of the Santa Barbara Commercial Subdistrict is to provide Golden Gate City with an area that is primarily commercial, with an allowance for certain conditional uses. The types of uses permitted within this Subdistrict are low intensity retail, offices, personal services, and institutional uses, such as _churches and day care centers. Such development is intended to serve the needs of residents within the Subdistrict and surrounding neighborhoods and persons traveling nearby. 10 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 13 of 21 Commercial and institutional uses permitted within this Subdistrict are those that: a. Generate/attract relatively low traffic volumes; b. Are appropriately landscaped and buffered to protect nearby residential properties; and c. Are architecturally designed to be compatible with nearby residential areas. 4. Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict The primary purpose of the Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict (see Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict Map) is to encourage redevelopment along Collier Boulevard in order to improve the physical appearance of the area. This Subdistrict is intended to allow a mix of uses, including heavy commercial within those areas presently zoned C-5. This Subdistrict includes properties zoned RMF-12, C-4, and C-5. This Subdistrict will allow commercial development on lands presently zoned residential. Buildings shall be limited to three stories, not to exceed 50 feet, inclusive of under building parking. _The Land Development Code shall be amended to establish a zoning overlay containing regulations to implement this Subdistrict. a. All development and redevelopment within this Subdistrict shall include: 1. Provisions for bicycle and pedestrian travel. 2. An emphasis on building aesthetics. 3. Emphasis on the orderly circulation of vehicular, bicycle and pedestrian traffic. 4. Provision for adequate ingress and egress,which may include local street vacation or relocation if alternative access is provided. 5. Provision for broad sidewalks or pathways. 6. Enhanced streetscaping. 7. Shared parking and/or property interconnections, where possible and feasible. 8. Quality designs for building facades, including lighting, uniform signage and landscaping. C. LIST OF MAPS Golden Gate City Future Land Use Map High Density Residential Subdistrict 1989 Boundaries of Activity Center Downtown Center Commercial Subdistrict Urban Mixed Use Activity Center/Golden Gate Parkway and Coronado Parkway Golden Gate City Urban Commercial Infill Subdistrict Santa Barbara Commercial Subdistrict Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict 11 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 14 of 21 T 49 S INTERSTATE 75 RN bm I — E pi -N d O o g c w o n0 D o "V §,,T, m m ' f o a a Q D\O °z a 7 N 7 N c O ;-1\12D7.'''''''''.....---••••••-•--------1 i z ZCD * co ,Tt9 A o -f> N to m SU 00 0 - Da m O nj6iO -, O onm c, , 0 0 CD o "m ay n Cn 3 n m r O 0 U -S ,-�, m 3 m m m o. 3 O ci o (D rn O m C) y N P. m a n 3 3 CQ M Z A) 1m. m c 3CD D � u) rpD 00 r w a = �. a m CD Oo m c a• ar" O 'o a a - y m a D) n' o m m W N CD 70 c I] C) -n 00 a O x m e•+• CD O ' Nma x o , -c `_, O zCO WI N M 2 m SANTA BARBARA BLVD o O 11 lic. O ii m ‘ r m C) 'sco m "< m o3o Z CO D -. o -9 r -I a. m W a z a\ a. cn 73 o �� c o co m � a * m o D m to o. o a ` a o Z � m a � m m 0 cn ,Y c C DI CD c -, I — m 3 .____\_": 0° _____L_imiiam. ›, coo co CD `' COLLIER BLVD HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL SUBDISTRICT '...., 1989 BOUNDARIES OF ACTIVITY CENTER n J — I ir ,--. I IJP - i __ r-=-- .7))11 Ifr_____: All 1 p , Li-_ , - , L \11 11r 1 II I Q �� u ��� -� = I ACTIVITY CENTER tO "II.-''--------/ 11111141111111.1_____7)1---1----------A . , I ,[- :: : ::,:: , , , , \ AAk'illi!!:;,3!!1,,':1,:1,,,,, I. \ „, _I \ (-1-1 i C ....,,,,,__.,_/' I ________ -- - - __--- ,___id ____. ][ IL1, f1 1 l MI 0 500fT 10 onIJ 1I1 I l 1 AMENDED—OCTOBER 14,2008 I Ord.N.2008-59 1 ^i PREPARED BY: GRAPHICS AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT SECTION COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION FILE: GGMP-6B-2008-1.DWG DATE: 10/2008 GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 16 of 21 Dmpm II o*so . m aB b: • - LD m�g< _ San Ba ra LY, I' �� 1■ L1�8M 1'!���..�Y �I�' Vin.■ m z D ��� mI l Il ■ ril■ I O~; 1i1�'��� 1 ■,/■,■■■■i//■■■ ,1111D o z ;ilk& `�!1I/II11111■■ mai a ■11111■■ 1■1■■■■11�1�!���■�i1■111 E mm�+ E igimmimmi i ■ � ■ ■: v; .jig �.■////■/■ ■■/■■■.■■/////■■■■■■■■■//1 8 y z I !!i�I■■I�� ti �► r •�1\��� ��� so I gr■■ IIu■/■■■■■■/■/■swei1111!1 !MUM 111111 r��• •• •t•1 ��1�� �e I .■ II■��1 .. _ ``����� �.•�•�� �� ♦ ♦ :�.�� �■ 11 . .. ■■■■■■I •♦ �* ♦♦♦�.��� 161+► . Sim ■■ .. ... 1 4 III ** ?1�♦' .'s 011.1::1 iillit Fr:* emo s, ♦ s♦ ♦♦ �►G ■/� ■■) t� , C .w 1111Wiao 1♦�,,, .♦\ N .:#\40-iiimm� ♦, ��® 7,4u W 1111//■ --�J■ al ' ‘ 0 u ni m UM MIL_ o I ■■■■■■■■n111110� # M.■ n 111111111111 - 0 1 al rumm1 s0" i►j♦♦. �� i� ::_ NI jl Imp !/1##UU C �/rl_� IN i ► '! ,� •� ■■ 11•011111111 A ? ♦ O C. M% '+►,�1►''I. •♦ � .0 ■s - !!!h■■■■■/r L____ IIII //■■bi `► ♦ ♦ • ♦ 17 Cin r l immimmini - o �Mil 1: 4,.1r1n Bili r�h lialaiiMilik '��`�� mil am NI.. o. No . 1r■1■.• . ■■111■/■■■■U ♦* 4 ea .. .. . . ■■/R�!N!ll!■/■/r/ ��� .. A. . . m . .. :a. w . .w Mw 41 . p Cri -,-) 2 111MIN1010 NUM 11111M 111 MI N. ♦♦♦♦. � ♦••�l�1♦, ii moi:�� �Z 011OPIIMIll 00—� 0 4♦4 S♦♦ ■■■■■■/■�■1 o n IP IIMPP■■■■r1r1S � ♦��♦♦♦4 11, NI■�III�■■■■ O I MI . II ���+���!♦♦�.i.,�;4 IN - Citi ■/■./.■■u1 \ IIMPRIMI1111 ,r< rt IwCC ♦ /1111113 "++ **v ��♦ �� • LA0 'AI;;N. ■■ ■11111111111 10. 1: .. . 11r1■1/1r1rrrlr sw� ♦♦ ♦ ♦ • • ♦ \ ■. g 1111 �r♦ • • \ .. ar�ltes�110 z - 0 I: ': :■./1!v I!��!■///�■//�■■� 00 *';,��/1/$•',•� • \ �� o w i/■■u11 -g m O m O� 1. r� 1iJ ' !i ' tai!$Ii%1rIii � 1111 s•' � \ �Z o .. .. 1 i '„�'\ 1D , o Io +mow . o. I mZ N� � .. . \�. �c o � .. �> m 11■ �. t ■ a - LI V3 8 N ,N ■. • Mrr r• IIII1■■ w A--�,--�, ■. .. alt•�►�► •� � �ro 8 8 ■w .. _ 1• ,,• •• 11�I�e1 Ail 0 o O ■. ow .. . • ��•w El A ■e .w ow ww s►• •1 ��■■r■1..111■■1111■•• •• � ♦ 0 00011'1/11■■■■■■1!R!1. ■X ii lIR1lJIIM y ■. .. .. .. ■. .. .• w •■111111111 me ow .. ■■ •♦ 00�• .,1111 rr / r■ t al ■111111 ■ 111 ■11 �� ♦� jflj_lI EP 711111 A►■ 11111111 ;I 1/!A1 ■■■r � ! .iiisi i MIA V Eli ® 1 MUM EN 3 + / 1 ! In wo w. . memos 911 2 -' t % :pump`■■11111 •• ii I N. 11111■1111■■ we w ( ' we e• •• www. .. i 0 n t� in /11I�!!1EPRI ■ am o o .�■�!g! 110 w._.:r :MI !.. a)0 0 0 ow w a OQ 0 111/1/11 ism I I I I I I l l l DE 0 :1111111111■ iiia wog o G' i i■■■14P �h1�■■ w 00 o & ■o I I I.�aT61,�I Ll Z Z z i 11111/11111/1/■■ •j } '°%'i4)1, 69 m oo I I I I I I i l l l a■■i .0 C it. 11/11!1 191///1/rte. iiirwulilit_imim1c. m■11..11.111/1■/►� �wcI I I i , 0m Collier BLVD - - ill URBAN MIXED USE ACTIVITY CENTER GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY AND CORONADO PARKWAY COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA 1i j a 1111 t1■■■■■///11 j �� 4, ♦A. ♦ ♦♦�� Iii 1'!! ♦♦��1►" ♦♦♦♦�` ♦♦■■ * ♦♦♦�♦'♦♦'�■. N!■!e/ ♦'_.,.. •■■ �,�i♦♦♦♦♦1• ♦♦♦♦ ♦♦ ♦ . • Ill azu-_-Ezzz„<2 .4 • .■ I ff/■■ / X1��♦ j♦ ♦ �o viii■■■■s m■., . 11 'I& ' 1 i♦ 1♦♦♦♦♦ ♦� i■ l �* �`1�I� �j1 1♦♦♦ #� ♦ t llig iVII ■`, ■ pa to v►1 1 1tt♦♦♦♦ .. mom�*/1�1�1♦ �1♦•T i•i��Aviv■■■■■i . ■r ■� •1 ► 1 11 1t ♦♦ Ct ■OM NI,l�!l1�1 ♦ ♦�j ♦ ♦♦ •• • • •■■1!!!��1�l�A■■■ Ea ■i mu ii re i i ii it t4♦ .r_ �1(■■1� �I��I • • •• r�i� vi■■■■■■■■■■■� p i■ iF ■E ■■ i■w �IpII'ULIH_ FIIi1 .. ■--���EU ■■.. . ■\ iii; ■■1■■ ■ ■■■m�■■■■■�■ ■■.. . ■■ �. . SITE . .. .. . . .■■■ i ■� . __� .. . . ■■■!�!lMIII■■ .■ ■■ ■ . Si.:1rm MIF .4 .. . . Immuum . .■ ■■■■■1■■■E 0 I I .E at .\ : ■, ■11■■1■■■■■■ ■■ ■■,�1l llim■ �L..j .. • ■■■■I�I�I�!!A■■■■ .� .E . ■■1■■1■■■■■ ( III :: ■■ ■ ■1■■■■■■■■■■1 _ .... .. .. . .. a /"► ► r , ■■■■■�A PIPI/ LTi NM IIII.. . ■■1■R�!ME __ - ■r.Mr, ■ ,J ��� S Corel Palma LN ■■■■■t! !E■ III .. . ■1■■■1111_ u■■■1■■■■■ ■■■■■■1111 ' / l.■■■■■■■■■■ •• • ■1■1■■1/ ■i i (TETTE. _�. ■■■■■■■ ■■■■�� 00/ ■QRES1■ II ■ ■■ i .■■■■■■ 11 -1-F--1W �,��♦.vv/111■! l��I�!Pl■ ,. ' ♦ �♦ X11Aviv■111■11■ 1 V7 •.. ■ ■■■■■!!!�I�IE11111/ ■ �� ♦ ♦•♦ "♦1� Et . 4,' 4. *$• sum NW:11 : [ 1... no"4014000 4,7 •41t 046340,40.-. 4 6 iielfil 11111101W NM MI i 0 t A 10*0 1 P lip 01,111PRIM,ME ril WI 11111 • #. 44 ::: 0%II ' I airs• , , ' .4. .4 AV\ 4v A 0 . .0 •is.It- ,. • sus aii0 # • 0011 0!if 4 IR 1/��� ♦♦ ♦♦ ♦♦ •♦ ��Am 1: �■■ . . ..se 2 es solot o♦ •• Tomaiss Lir- IIIR IO ■ 1**��♦�♦ r•i�i i •1/1k1_1L ■E� ■t ■t ice` ; no .. .F AMENDED -JANUARY 25 2005 tt i tIm ■i ■■ tt ■: ■■■■■■■■■11■I(Ord. No. 20053) ■imil 1^► -P■ 111M,��s 4 ■■ /■RI!l P111■■■4 ■t ■ F • 111111111111■■■■: ■■\ ■ AMENDED-JANUARY 25, 2007 ■ 11111111 111M !191■■■■■■■■■ (Ord. No. 2007-19) 1 ■111■ �!�!!��1 /M1■1■111111■1■ AMENDED -OCTOBER 14, 2008 ■■' ■11111111IMF t 1111/111111/1!�!1 `" �� Ord. No. 2008-59 ■j '1!1111111111 ( ) -7 ri-1 FTTII 11111 ■■1■■■ LEGEND 7 Z . ADDITION PREPARED BY:GIS/CAD MAPPING SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT 0 500 1,000 2,000 Feet ACTIVITY CENTER FILE:RLS-18-CMP-01009 ACTIVITY CENTER MAP.mxdIli I I ' I I BOUNDARIES I DATE:07/2019 GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 18 of 21 -n+h7m S mGlzm = o. u t...._ '02 Z-; m A H m• y o m r r a3i o z z _..... mm< ZD n Sant. Barbara B VD = `_ 3 m Lz1 y Santa Barbara BLVD v s D n� m v 1 Tro•ical WAV 3 N IV m M 55th TER SW n 55th TER 5W IV 2 NM CO 55th ST SW m IN 55th ST SW O S tiL 54th LN SW �_ 0 ' Q 3 54th TER SW N n �, 54th TER SW _ ,� 54th ST SW vn 5 dq D m c4. 9L� d.- .'"o"' u tn `-, 53rd ST SW >�n `riy > y , 53rd ST SW 2 S (s$ a65 r'', o ; ; (q(r YSAS'' E ' 5 id LN SW tf�' ... o MS Ni PuZS INoo �YQ, S1.S�i'` x 52 TER W -�.:... h N n $ '.1 r 9 Hunter BLVD y 52nd TER SW Cri- CI) °ashes +`. ; w N /// ;� j59 % 55 5TEASW O o ..55.'52nd ST SW � y --a 7. 9 A C' m 3 5s �Q! \ 1 A_51st ST SW C - O r E 5ya e� s/y .. �.. CD O— 10th LN SW' q 9L< ',O G _. `OIh TER SW � `.J w \ n o �� m MS i9314)OS ,�50th S SW le c 50th ST SW M SS Uta A 1A 1 S — w YY N) �SOth(>T SW�i (i N n o rr ti N O �^ 49th LN SW. Ti e' a O y — �z A 49th TER v m z F71 ti � m D H rrl r 49th ST SW §' '' m (� CD CD f � p C Iii‘ 4th STSro 48th TERSW lri— Sunshine BLVDry M rTropics a BLVD z� n � z Cv A Soyr46th TER SW y p47th TER SW tJ` C n 46th ST SW Z o 47th ST 8W 54 yT 4 1�._. 47 M• N i 45th TERSW a 7J I-� 46th ST SW > Z r m' O D D w m N m H 45:h Sr SW' F — m 3 m m m z 9 a O Z O 5 A O O m O O o m n 7 44th TERSW z0 zS zm co o ; lytan f \ r C I!III 44thSTt 4thTE 4 3rd LNW Clii ll q. 43 TER SW CA o W N u VA co J p O 6 W W 9 w. o 1.5i 43rd ST SW n' °' 43rd ST SW c) - m r- 43 ey y oi tri L/ 42nd TERSW'6' I--I 42nd TER SW 'r i 42nd ST SW ; 42nd 8. ^ 42nd ST SW - F—+ So 41st TERS -..18/ ,5'/ 41st TER SW 0 d1 st ST SW 41st ST SWH. );7 r m. tilCollier BLVD m Z C ^ < _._.___.... _............._..... Collier BLVD I �_ -n730 4, n 1� � 39th ST SW ,zm Z o m COOz LS C m = ti 0 E D o I II '' (nim z 1m0 0 I I C3 0-i m m m SANTA BARBARA COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA ....AN e 4 m 10 22 230 AV.SM. 14 a' Ira smA ,. l 115 0 . •+ SN 11 a a� ��y© 3 © 1s 94 99 2 . ,2% H—: za M�w�� © 5�© +e1p 1e+> sib �W�© 13 ID 95 98 22ND PLACE SW. m u e ©� ��No��n©® 22ND PLACE S.W. m O 1e 15 n €®®�© u 14 miw 116 3 e Ip y e ����� ©�"- ©y 12 1e < \ o 23RD AVENUE S.W. Q; w BJ. i 1e 21 ;a 14 a©eeeae ei� e�m p ;o 17 g� 117 m \i/� u u —i 13 ©©©©©©ii�©©ili�lil n p 1e ii� lz s1 s tz 23RD PLACE S.W. a tp (,, 1+s• a 11 ` T 03"so 24TH AVENUE S.W. \\I/ 1 > ® to` � 10 2s >- 10 z s s e p 10 n 15 n 1• e r Ne. /'� _ 22 2e 22 2e 2s 24 9 22 21 20 16 16 1 `x(10 6$2A 06_ p >o > 1e 5 22 118 \�%� ee/� - 06 23RD COURT S.W. 4 23 � 7 Te - e I+ 7 1+ ` J 24 \� e 6 b 1 2 3 4 6 9 p 1� '2 t] t• 2 L, 1�f� y m .e n 2e 2• n m s 1e 1> s 30 12 e 30 1e 96 97 119 \\\i% 4 31 -3 4 §U: 9 1 . . _' 24TH AVENUE S.W. �jr!�/ 3 ss 14 ] 0 r + 12 ,... §U 2 3 • 5 e 7 e p le 11 �.'/ h 23 21 20 19 666'le Il II 15 14 &0 , N le 1 24 13 03 \\j� CORONADO PARKWAY 87 102 . $1r/ e p a ©y 1 2 3 • > e p 1e 111 104 s+oi © © p 1•v 12 Zf 20 1 18to 16 +3 12 WI jIIP ~ ; 21 > 11 , s 12 i<©�` 25TH AVENUE SW. 26TH AVENUE S.W. `\�� 4 t3 e u �E lm= u® ma 111 0 1nal MI 6 !e = IA ai oma 83 101 \'%/ `26TH CT.SW. 0 04(0 #4 -.� m®a� © 411 0 0210 ,040 106 \i% � ���� ® ��V To � ©0v Ii. 0 107 \Ii 3 aee�ee �� �� ®� s©o�� r/I /�� © VE�'e� �� sr.E ZABE H SETON 89 1C0 tO ftej ©©©r© 6 Pl i %I s� s11:4 'c1 %ARCH a scHDOL LOT 1 LOT 2 LOT 2 TR REP AT \!��/. a 3 ©eNe �®���'e���� ©©���5 Eye / 111• INT* J� MTh AVENUE S.W. \I/ p 1e 11111110t# 14 P���� 14 \�/( 109 for 6 ©lo 0,n �� © �uNo 90 99 \'C s2II 0 Of4It©V 4���o 3 �. 110 \%iV ©©©VII©® 11 �lr ©© itME GP4., \ 2 W. 2�2• a©eeeeee� 1©® ��®p `UN Z�S 111 27TH CT.S.W. ` ©o .7.. ®�� �s 91 98 a© 1s ��©� O� 5 ® O %©1106% i ® �� 112 w SANTA BARBARA ©� ���� ®O SQUARE CENTER 30 ZO ©e���GAAs�t1144 Zr. GOLDEN CATE PARKWAY 11141111 10.-0-4,v--4"7":10.- 0��e©©PSR+ IB t> 9P I 7 I 113 I PAe WAY CENTS N� z• I /\ I 2 3 • ro 14 11 .£ e v 1e m AMENDED - OCTOBER 25, 2004 SAMA BARBARA COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT (Ord. No. 2004-71) LEGEND .......\SCALE I AMENDED — JUNE 7, 2005 ORIGINAL SUBDISTRICT Q 200FT 4004-7 (Ord. No. 2005-25) PREPARED BY: GRAPHICS AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT SECTION AMENDED — OCTOBER 14, 2008 b.:\" SUBDISTRICT 0 EXPANSION COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION (Ord. No. 2008-59) FILE: CPSP-2004-70-2008-1.DWG DATE: 10/2008 GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 20 of 21 COLLIER BOULEVARD COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA ORM BOULEVARD 0101I01 ANIS B MThI NTS 3( • , , , r , \I� (COUFN ECLU MAARTLEN5) B0 + + +©+ + + &IM. u (NORNCAIE CLUB•PM1IExT5) T11E OMS AP"'"'" 1 MN PLACE S.W. , P;\\\ TRACT B _t\\\\ \I,\\\. .;\\`I\\,\\\\\` 3 ITN AVENUE S.W. ■■■■■■■■■■UIIW ! '\ ka moo: A .f ,,\\\\,\`.1 .. ( . d,j\\1\�Ii\t; W.. ! .'1\\M,I, N, B..B N B M !;\\�\\ EI\\\\ !!` B 5 . . \\I\\\�;.\\ L AVE SW. • `�` \\\. MM 8 Mg Ill& .• 16111 PLACE S.W. .v O. =\\ \,`\ willIPIIIIIN t. \�\�t\•\\\\\ 4111116111111 =1 M-\ 1 • MTN AVENUE SW. IBTH AVENUE S.W.SW \1 '...,■■ISI■' . TBTN COURT S.W. i CANAL 4�m \\���\ d'--�t IN-RNRR mm\f\I\ '. MN RACE SW. ,9= --`MIN, `�Eta[Se yam`,\\\\\ ty loommimms 201)1 AVENUE S.W. ,.1`\I�\\\� i ."„■I■ SERENADE CANAL \\A ,1` \; ...... 4$ 20TH somml20TH PL S.W. \\,, ,N. , . 011H■ — — E N 21ST AVENUE S.W. ' 21ST AVENUE SW. !WE\\\`\\�\\ • .•�\•`\\ a ,. — — ,�...N..& \` *22ND AVENUE SII. +22ND AV.SW ;\\� \\\\ 2210 PLACE SW - • MI-\\\ \`\`_y,t 1 o e e isP R1`�rw tam Awes SW O • -O- -0 0• \\ \ w ..4!\ \� '. m AVENUE S.W. - 23RD ..;\\\\\\ g 21X0 (PUCE SW. T J ,, p.\\\ 5 BIM. �� GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY F 1 El i TRAC1 A COUNTRY CLU111111.1111[ 11111 . 1 II N GOLDEN gATE B I ADOPTED —OCTOBER 26, 2004 — (Ord. No.2004-71) LEGEND AMENDED— JANUARY 25,2007 (Ord. No.2007-19) AMENDED—OCTOBER 14,2008 COLLIER BOULEVARD (Ord. No.2008-59) \ COMMERCIAL PREPARED BY: GRAPHICS AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT SECTION 50A R \�\� SUBDISTRICT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION I I I I I FILE: GGMP-51A-2008-1.DWG DATE: 10/2008 0 200FT 400FT GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 21 of 21 Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element "Exhibit A" GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN URBAN GOLDEN GATE ESTATES SUB-ELEMENT Prepared by Collier County Zoning Division Prepared for COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Adopted (date) The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 1 of 32 Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element AMENDMENTS TO COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN: URBAN GOLDEN GATE ESTATES SUB-ELEMENT DATE AMENDED ORDINANCE NO. (date), 2019 2019-(#) The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 2 of 32 Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element TABLE OF CONTENTS Page A. Goals, Objectives and Policies 1 B. Land Use Designation Description Section 9 1. ESTATES DESIGNATION 9 A. Estates— Mixed Use District 9 1. Residential Estates Subdistrict 2. Neighborhood Center Subdistrict 3. Conditional Uses Subdistrict 4. Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict B. Estates— Commercial District 15 1. Interchange Activity Center Subdistrict 2. Pine Ridge Road Mixed Use Subdistrict 3. Commercial Western Estates Infill Subdistrict 4. Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict 5. Southbrooke Office Subdistrict C. List Of Maps 19 Urban Golden Gate Estates Future Land Use Map Urban Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict Pine Ridge Road (CR 896)— Interchange Activity Center and Pine Ridge Road Mixed Use Subdistrict Urban Golden Gate Estates Neighborhood Center Collier Boulevard/Pine Ridge Road Center Commercial Western Estates Infill Subdistrict Golden Gate Parkway Interchange Conditional Uses Area Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict Southbrooke Office Subdistrict Conditional Uses Subdistrict: Golden Gate Parkway Special Provisions Special Exceptions to Conditional Use in Golden Gate Estates The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 3 of 32 A. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES GOAL 1: TO GUIDE LAND USE AND PUBLIC FACILITY DECISION MAKING AND TO BALANCE THE NEED TO PROVIDE BASIC SERVICES WITH NATURAL RESOURCE CONCERNS THROUGH A WELL PLANNED MIX OF COMPATIBLE LAND USES WHICH ENSURE THE HEALTH, SAFETY, WELFARE, AND QUALITY OF LIFE OF THE LOCAL RESIDENTS. OBJECTIVE 1.1: Develop new or revised uses of land consistent with designations outlined on the Urban Golden Gate Estates Future Land Use Map and provisions found in the Land Use Designation Description Section of this Sub-Element. Policy 1.1.1: The Policies under the above Objective shall identify the Future Land Use Designations, Districts, and Subdistricts for the Urban Golden Gate Estates. Policy 1.1.2: The Land Use Designation Description Section of this Element shall provide the standards and permitted uses for Urban Golden Gate Estate Future Land Use Districts and Subdistricts. Policy 1.1.3: The Urban Golden Gate Estate Future Land Use Map and companion Future Land Use Designations, Districts, and Subdistricts shall be binding on all development orders unless otherwise permitted in this Master Plan effective with the adoption of this Master Plan. Policy 1.1.4: The ESTATES Future Land Use Designation shall include Future Land Use Districts and Subdistricts for: A. ESTATES— MIXED USE DISTRICT 1. Residential Estates Subdistrict 2. Neighborhood Center Subdistrict 3. Conditional Uses Subdistrict 4. Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict B. ESTATES —COMMERCIAL DISTRICT 1. Interchange Activity Center Subdistrict 2. Pine Ridge Road Mixed Use Subdistrict 3. Commercial Western Estates Infill Subdistrict 4 Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict 5. Southbrooke Office Subdistrict Policy 1.1.5: Conditional Use requests within Urban Golden Gate Estates shall adhere to the guidelines outlined in the Conditional Uses Subdistrict. Policy 1.1.6: To obtain Conditional Use approval, a super majority vote (minimum of 4 votes) by the Board of Zoning Appeals shall be required. 1 --� The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 4 of 32 Policy 1.1.7: No development orders shall be issued inconsistent with the Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub- ~" Element with the exception of those unimproved properties granted a positive determination through the Zoning Re-evaluation Program and identified on the Future Land Use Map Series as properties consistent by Policy and those development orders issued pursuant to conditional uses and_rezones approved based on the County-Wide Future Land Use Element (adopted January 10, 1989, Ordinance 89-05) which was in effect at the time of approval. Any subsequent development orders shall also be reviewed for consistency with the Growth Management Plan based on the County-Wide Future Land Use Element. Policy 1.1.8: The sites containing existing public educational plants and ancillary plants, and the undeveloped sites owned by the Collier County School Board for future public educational plants and ancillary plants, within the GGAMP area, are depicted on the Future Land Use Map Series in the countywide FLUE and on the Public School Facilities Element Map Series, and referenced in FLUE Policy 5.14 and Intergovernmental Coordination Element Policy 1.2.6. All of these sites are subject to the general Interlocal Agreement, adopted on May 15, 2003 by the Collier County School Board and on May 27, 2003 by the Board of County Commissioners, and as subsequently amended and restated, with an effective date of December 2008, and subject to the implementing land development regulations to be adopted. OBJECTIVE 1.2: Ensure public facilities are provided at an acceptable level of service. Policy 1.2.1: Requests for new uses of land shall be subject to level of service standards and concurrency requirements for public facilities as outlined in the Capital Improvement Element of the Growth `- Management Plan. OBJECTIVE 1.3: Protect and preserve the valuable natural resources within the Urban Golden Gate Estates. Policy 1.3.1: The County shall protect and preserve natural resources within the Urban Golden Gate Estates in accordance with the Objectives and Policies contained within Goals 6 and 7 of the Collier County Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME). Policy 1.3.2: As provided for in CCME Policy 6.1.1, the subdivision of tracts up to 13 acres in size and designated Residential Estates Subdistrict shall not trigger preserve requirements. Policy 1.3.3: Collier County shall coordinate its planning and permitting activities within the Urban Golden Gate Estates with all other applicable environmental planning, permitting and regulatory agencies to ensure that all Federal, State and local natural resource protection regulations are being enforced. OBJECTIVE 1.4: Provide a living environment within the Urban Golden Gate Estates, which is aesthetically acceptable and protects the quality of life. 2 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 5 of 32 Policy 1.4.1: Collier County shall provide a living environment that is aesthetically acceptable and protects the quality of life through the enforcement of applicable codes and laws. Policy 1.4.2: The County's Code Enforcement Board shall strictly enforce the Land Development Code and other applicable codes and laws to control the illegal storage of machinery, vehicles and junk, and the illegal operation of commercial activities within the Urban Golden Gate Estates. GOAL 2: TO PROVIDE FOR LIMITED COMMERCIAL SERVICES AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR PURPOSES OF SERVING THE RURAL NEEDS OF GOLDEN GATE ESTATES RESIDENTS, SHORTENING VEHICULAR TRIPS, AND PRESERVING RURAL CHARACTER. OBJECTIVE 2.1: Meet the locational and rural design criteria contained within the Estates Designation, Estates- Mixed Use District, Neighborhood Center Subdistrict and Conditional Use Subdistrict of this Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element, of the Collier County Growth Management Plan when considering the placement and designation of Neighborhood Centers and Conditional Uses within Urban Golden Gate Estates. Policy 2.1.1: Neighborhood Centers within Urban Golden Gate Estates shall be subject to the locational and rural design criteria established within the Estates Designation, Estates — Mixed Use District, Neighborhood Center Subdistrict of this Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element, of the Collier County Growth Management Plan. -� Policy 2.1.2: Conditional Uses within Urban Golden Gate Estates shall be subject to locational and dimensional criteria established within the Conditional Use Subdistrict in the Land Use Designation Description section of this Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element. GOAL 3: TO PRESERVE THE AREA'S RURAL CHARACTER, AS DEFINED BY LARGE WOODED LOTS, THE KEEPING OF LIVESTOCK, THE ABILITY TO GROW CROPS, WILDLIFE ACTIVITY, ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP, LOW-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, AND LIMITATIONS ON COMMERCIAL AND CONDITIONAL USES. OBJECTIVE 3.1: Balance the provision of public infrastructure with the need to preserve the rural character of Urban Golden Gate Estates. Policy 3.1.1: Future road and bridge improvements in Urban Golden Gate Estates shall not only provide for safety and reasonable mobility, but shall also contribute to the rural character of the area. Transportation improvements shall be designed in context with their setting. 3 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 6 of 32 Policy 3.1.2 The County shall initiate architectural standard requirements in the Land Development Code within two years of adoption that apply to commercial, conditional use and essential services facilities, reflecting the rural character of the Estates area and providing coherence and area identity. Policy 3.1.3: The County Manager or designee shall create a public network of greenway corridors within Urban Golden Gate Estates that interconnects public lands and permanently protected green space. The greenway network shall consist of interconnected trails and paths that allow people to move about the Estates area by means other than motorized vehicles. All greenways shall be constructed within or abutting existing or future public easements or rights-of-way. In creating the greenway network, the County shall not employ eminent domain proceedings. Policy 3.1.4: Recognizing the residential nature of the land uses surrounding the 1-75 interchange at Golden Gate Parkway, as well as the restrictions on conditional uses of the Conditional Uses Subdistrict of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan, there shall be no further commercial zoning for properties abutting Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. No new commercial uses shall be permitted on properties abutting streets accessing Golden Gate Parkway within the above-defined segment. This policy shall not apply to that existing portion of the Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict, which is located at the northwest corner of the intersection of Golden Gate Parkway and Santa Barbara Boulevard. OBJECTIVE 3.2: Provide for the protection of the rural character of Urban Golden Gate Estates. Policy 3.2.1: Rural character protection provisions shall provide for the preservation of such rural amenities as, but not limited to, wooded lots, the keeping of livestock, the ability to grow crops, wildlife activity, and low-density residential development. Policy 3.2.2: The growing of food crops and/or the keeping of livestock on properties within Urban Golden Gate Estates shall be permitted, provided that such activities are conducted according to the Land Development Code. Policy 3.2.3: Rural character shall be further protected by resisting site-specific Master Plan changes that are out of scale or character with the rural quality of Urban Golden Gate Estates. Policy 3.2.4: Recognizing the low density in Urban Golden Gate Estates, the County will initiate a review of written notification requirements in the Land Development Code and the Administrative Code related to land use petitions in Golden Gate Estates, within 1 year of adoption, and consider increasing the specified distance, with particular attention to properties located on dead-end streets. 4 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 7 of 32 Policy 3.2.5: Consistent with public safety requirements and best practices for rural areas, outdoor lighting within Urban Golden Gate Estates shall be placed, constructed and maintained in such manner as to prevent or reduce light pollution. In implementing this Policy, the County shall: a. Adhere to the"Collier County Lighting Standards"(County Manager's Office Standards dated January 6, 2017)as amended, with respect to new and existing County owned or maintained sites and structures. b. Continue to coordinate with FPL and FDOT to improve roadway and security lighting consistent with International Dark Skies Association best practices. c. Consider changes to the Land Development Code and other applicable ordinances to create voluntary or mandatory outdoor lighting standards for commercial, residential or other uses consistent with International Dark Skies Association best practices, and determine the extent such standards apply to new or existing development. OBJECTIVE 3.3: Encourage the preservation of natural resources in Urban Golden Gate Estates, including protection and enhancement of its watershed. Policy 3.3.1: The Land Development Code shall continue to allow and further encourage the preservation of native vegetation and wildlife indigenous to the Urban Golden Gate Estates. Policy 3.3.2: The County shall continue to pursue the Watershed Management Plan initiatives in Urban Golden Gate Estates as financial and staff resources become available. Policy 3.3.3: The County shall encourage the combination of parcels smaller than 2.25 acres with other parcels in order to preserve and enhance low-density environmental advantages. Within two years of adoption of this policy, County staff will present recommendations for property owner incentives to the Board of County Commissioners. Policy 3.3.4: The County will evaluate the use of transferable development rights for the purpose of securing the preservation of wetland or other environmentally significant land within Urban Golden Gate Estates, in a timeframe directed by the Board. Policy 3.3.5: Within two years of adoption, the County, in coordination with the Floodplain Management Committee, will initiate a study on the feasibility of dispersed water management(DWM)for single family Estates lots, and determine the extent to which it will rely on voluntary, incentive or mandatory provisions and whether provisions will apply to developed and undeveloped Estates parcels. Policy 3.3.6: The County will continue to identify and implement educational opportunities related to water resources for parcel owners, homeowners, builders, real estate professionals and the public to aid in understanding and addressing site-specific financial and environmental impacts as well as area-wide impacts to water resources. 5 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 8 of 32 Policy 3.3.7: The County will periodically coordinate with the South Florida Water Management District to review the Level of Service Standards for primary water management canals within the County and their effect on Urban Golden Gate Estates. Policy 3.3.8: The County shall continue to pursue a best management practices approach to making septage treatment available to residents and businesses within Urban Golden Gate Estates, as a component of bio-solid processing, either directly, through a private entity, or through a public- private partnership. GOAL 4: TO PROVIDE FOR A SAFE AND EFFICIENT COUNTY AND LOCAL ROADWAY NETWORK, WHILE AT THE SAME TIME SEEKING TO PRESERVE THE RURAL CHARACTER OF GOLDEN GATE ESTATES IN FUTURE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE GOLDEN GATE AREA. OBJECTIVE 4.1: Increase linkages within the local road system for the purposes of limiting traffic on arterials and major collectors within Urban Golden Gate Estates, shortening vehicular trips, and increasing overall road system capacity. Policy 4.1.1: The County shall continue to explore alternative financing methods to facilitate both east- west and north-south bridging of canals within Urban Golden Gate Estates. Policy 4.1.2: The County shall update the 2008 Bridge Study to prioritize bridge construction based on emergency response times, evacuation times, cost components, anticipated development patterns and other considerations and shall report its recommendations to the Board of County Commissioners within two years of adoption of this policy. Policy 4.1.3: Planning and right-of-way acquisition for bridges within the Urban Golden Gate Estates local road system shall include consideration of the costs and benefits of including sidewalks and bike lanes. Policy 4.1.4: Sidewalks and bike lanes shall provide access to government facilities, schools, commercial areas and the planned Metropolitan Planning Organization greenway network. Policy 4.1.5: Planning, funding and implementation of potential greenway trails shall be coordinated between the County and the Metropolitan Planning Organization. GOAL 5: TO PROTECT THE LIVES AND PROPERTY OF THE RESIDENTS OF THE URBAN GOLDEN GATE AREA, AS WELL AS THE HEALTH OF THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT, THROUGH THE PROVISION OF EMERGENCY SERVICES THAT PREPARE FOR, MITIGATE, AND RESPOND TO, NATURAL AND MANMADE DISASTERS. 6 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 9 of 32 OBJECTIVE 5.1: Coordinate with local emergency services officials in engineering and constructing road improvements within Urban Golden Gate Estates to ensure that the access needs of fire department, police and emergency management personnel and vehicles are met. Policy 5.1.1: Collier County shall hold at least one annual public meeting with Urban Golden Gate Estates emergency services providers and the local civic association in order to ensure that emergency needs are addressed during the acquisition of right-of-way for design and construction of road improvements. Policy 5.1.2: Collier County shall continue to coordinate with Golden Gate Area emergency services providers to prioritize necessary road improvements related to emergency evacuation needs. OBJECTIVE 5.2: Ensure that the needs of all applicable emergency services providers are included and coordinated in the overall public project design for capital improvement projects within the Urban Golden Gate Estates. Policy 5.2.1: Preparation of Collier County's annual Schedule of Capital Improvements for projects within the Urban Golden Gate Estates shall be coordinated with the independent Fire Districts that serve Golden Gate Estates (Fire Districts), public and private utilities, Emergency Medical Services Department and the Collier County Sheriff's Department to ensure that public project designs are consistent with the needs of these agencies. Policy 5.2.2: Districts, Collier County Emergency Medical Services Department and the Collier County Sheriff's Department will receive copies of pre-construction plans for capital improvement projects in the Golden Gate Area and will be invited to review and comment on plans for the public projects. OBJECTIVE 5.3: Maintain and implement public information programs through the Collier County Bureau of Emergency Services, Collier County Sheriff's Department, Fire Districts, and other appropriate agencies, to inform residents and visitors of the Greater Golden Gate Area regarding the means to prevent, prepare for, and cope with, man-made and natural disasters. Policy 5.3.1: The Fire Districts that serve the Golden Gate area, and other appropriate agencies, shall embark on an education program to assist residents in knowing and understanding the value and need for prescribed burning on public lands in high risk fire areas. Policy 5.3.2: The Fire Districts, and Collier County Bureau of Emergency Services shall actively promote the Firewise Communities Program through public education in Urban Golden Gate Estates. 7 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 10 of 32 Policy 5.3.3: Fire Districts, and the Collier County Bureau of Emergency Services shall hold one or more annual "open house" presentations in the Golden Gate area emphasizing issues related to wildfires, flooding, emergency access and general emergency management. OBJECTIVE 5.4: Pursue appropriate planning and mitigation measures to address the threat of wildfires in Urban Golden Gate Estates. Policy 5.4.1: Collier County shall evaluate the Land Development Code for Urban Golden Gate Estates requirements that are found to be inconsistent with acceptable fire prevention standards. This evaluation process shall be coordinated with the Fire Districts, and the Collier County Bureau of Emergency Services. Policy 5.4.2: The County shall explore annually, options for funding wildfire prevention measures undertaken by the County, Florida Forest Service and/or independent Fire Districts, including but not limited to Urban Golden Gate Estates Municipal Services Taxing Units (MSTU) revenue, grant funding and general fund revenue. Policy 5.4.3: The County shall review annually and update as necessary, all interlocal agreements and mutual aid agreements to assure coordination of legal, procedural and educational components of wildfire prevention. Policy 5.4.4: County-owned property within Urban Golden Gate Estates shall be subject to an active, on-going management plan to reduce the damage caused by wildfires originating from County-owned properties. JREMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK1 8 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 11 of 32 B. LAND USE DESIGNATION DESCRIPTION SECTION The following section describes the three land use designations shown on the Urban Golden Gate Estates Future Land Use Map. These designations generally indicate the types of land uses for which zoning may be requested. However, these land use designations do not guarantee that a zoning request will be approved. Requests may be denied by the Board of County Commissioners based on criteria in the Land Development Code or in special studies completed for the County. 1. ESTATES DESIGNATION This designation is characterized by low density semi-rural residential lots with limited opportunities for other land uses. Typical lots are 2.25 acres in size. However, there are some legal non-conforming lots as small as 1.14 acres. Residential density is limited to a maximum of one unit per 2.25 gross acres, or one unit per legal non-conforming lot of record, exclusive of guesthouses. Multiple family dwelling units, duplexes, and other structures containing two or more principal dwellings, are prohibited in all Districts and Subdistricts in this Designation. Generally, the Estates Designation also accommodates future non-residential uses, including: a. Conditional uses and essential services as defined in the Land Development Code, except as prohibited in the Neighborhood Center Subdistrict. Also, refer to the Conditional Uses Subdistrict. b. Parks, open space and recreational uses. c. Group Housing shall be permitted subject to the definitions and regulations as outlined in the Collier County Land Development Code (Ordinance No. 04-41, as amended) and consistent with locational requirements in Florida Statutes (Chapter 419.001 F.S.). d. Schools and school facilities in the Estates Designation north of 1-75, and where feasible and mutually acceptable, co-locate schools with other public facilities, such as parks, libraries and community centers to the extent possible. Group Housing includes the following type facilities: aa. Family Care Facility if occupied by not more than six (6) persons shall be permitted in residential areas. bb. Group Care Facility, cc. Care Units, dd. Adult Congregate Living Facilities, and ee. Nursing Homes. All of the above uses shall be consistent with all of the Goals, Objectives and Policies of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan. A. Estates—Mixed-Use District 1. Residential Estates Subdistrict Single-family residential development is allowed within this Subdistrict at a maximum density of one unit per 2.25 gross acres, or one unit per legal non-conforming lot of record, exclusive of guesthouses. 2. Neighborhood Center Subdistrict Recognizing the need to provide basic goods, services and amenities to Estates residents, one Neighborhood Center has been designated on the Urban Golden Gate Estates Future Land Use Map. The Neighborhood Center designation does not guarantee that commercial 9 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 12 of 32 zoning will be granted. The designation only provides the opportunity to request commercial zoning. a. The Collier County Land Development Code shall be amended to provide rural design criteria to regulate all new commercial development within Neighborhood Centers. b. Locations Neighborhood Centers are located along major roadways and are distributed within Golden Gate Estates according to commercial demand estimates. (See Urban Golden Gate Estates Neighborhood Center Map). The centers are designed to concentrate all new commercial zoning, and conditional uses, as allowed in the Estates Zoning District, in locations where traffic impacts can be readily accommodated and to avoid strip and disorganized patterns of commercial and conditional use development. One Neighborhood Center is established as follows: i. Collier Boulevard and Pine Ridge Road Center. The center at Collier Boulevard and Pine Ridge Road is located on both sides of the intersection. Tracts 109-114, Unit 26, Golden Gate Estates are included in this center as eligible for commercial development. (See Collier Boulevard/Pine Ridge Road Center Map). The E1/2 of Tract 107, Unit 26 is also included within this center but is only to be used for buffer, water management and open space. c. Criteria for land uses at the center is as follows: Commercial uses shall be limited to intermediate commercial so as to provide for a wider variety of goods and services in areas that have a higher degree of automobile traffic. These uses shall be similar to C-1, C-2, or C-3 zoning districts outlined in the Collier County Land Development Code (Ordinance No. 04-41, as amended), except as prohibited below. ii. The Neighborhood Center located at the intersection of Pine Ridge Road and Collier Boulevard may be developed at 100% commercial and must provide internal circulation. Any rezoning is encouraged to be in the form of a PUD. This Neighborhood Center may also be utilized for single-family residential or conditional uses allowed in the Estates zoning district such as churches, social or fraternal organizations, childcare centers, schools, and group care facilities. iii. A single project shall utilize no more than 50% of the total allowed commercial acreage. This percentage may be increased at the discretion of the Board of County Commissioners. iv. The project shall make provisions for shared parking arrangements with adjoining developments. v. Access points shall be limited to one per 180 feet commencing from the right- of-way of the major intersecting streets of the Neighborhood Center. A maximum of three curb cuts per quadrant shall be allowed. vi. Driveways and curb cuts shall be consolidated with adjoining developments, whenever possible. vii. Driveways accessing parcels on opposite sides of the roadway shall be in direct alignment, except when the roadway median between the two parcels has no opening. 10 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 13 of 32 viii. Projects shall provide a 25-foot wide landscape buffer abutting the external ..� right-of-way. This buffer shall contain two staggered rows of trees that shall be spaced no more than 30 feet on center, and a double row hedge at least 24 inches in height at time of planting and attaining a minimum of three feet height within one year. A minimum of 50% of the 25-foot wide buffer area shall be comprised of a meandering bed of shrubs and ground covers other than grass. Existing native trees must be retained within this 25-foot wide buffer area to aid in achieving this buffer requirement; other existing native vegetation shall be retained, where possible, to aid in achieving this buffer requirement. Water retention/detention areas shall be allowed in this buffer area if left in natural state, and drainage conveyance through the buffer area shall be allowed if necessary to reach an external outfall. a. For Tract 114, Golden Gate Estates, Unit 26, access shall be restricted to 11th Avenue S.W. Also, vehicular interconnection shall be provided to the adjacent property(s) in the Pine Ridge Road/Collier Boulevard Neighborhood Center. b. All buildings shall have tile roofs, 'Old Style Florida' metal roofs, or decorative parapet walls above the roofline. The buildings shall be finished in light, subdued colors, except for decorative trim. ix. All lighting facilities shall be architecturally—designed, and shall be limited to a height of twenty-five (25)feet. Such lighting facilities shall be shielded from neighboring residential land uses and consistent with Policy 5.2.4. x. Commercial uses shall encourage pedestrian traffic through placement of sidewalks, pedestrian walkways, and marked crosswalks within parking -� areas. Adjacent projects shall coordinate placement of sidewalks so that a continuous pathway through the Neighborhood Center is created. xi. All buildings and projects within any single specific quadrant of the Subdistrict shall utilize a common architectural theme. This theme shall be applicable to both building design and signage. xii. Fences or walls may be constructed on the commercial side of the required landscape buffer between adjacent commercial and residential uses. If constructed, such fences or walls shall not exceed five (5) feet in height. Walls shall be constructed of brick or stone. Fences shall be of wood or concrete post or rail types, and shall be of open design (not covered by slats, boards or wire). xiii. Projects directly abutting residential property (property zoned E-Estates and without an approved conditional use) shall provide, at a minimum, a seventy-five (75) feet wide buffer in which no parking uses are permitted. Twenty-five (25) feet of the width of the buffer along the developed area shall be a landscape buffer. A minimum of fifty (50)feet of the buffer width shall consist of retained native vegetation and must be consistent with subsection 3.05.07H. of the Collier County Land Development Code(LDC). The native vegetation retention area may consist of a perimeter berm and be used for water management detention. Any newly constructed berm shall be revegetated to meet subsection 3.05.07H. of the LDC (native vegetation replanting requirements). Additionally, in order to be considered 11 --� The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 14 of 32 for approval, use of the native vegetation retention area for water management purposes shall meet the following criteria: a. There shall be no adverse impacts to the native vegetation being retained. The additional water directed to this area shall not increase the annual hydro-period unless it is proven that such would have no adverse impact to the existing vegetation. b. If the project requires permitting by the South Florida Water Management District, the project shall provide a letter or official document from the District indicating that the native vegetation within the retention area will not have to be removed to comply with water management requirements. If the District cannot or will not supply such a letter, then the native vegetation retention area shall not be used for water management. c. If the project is reviewed by Collier County, the County engineer shall provide evidence that no removal of native vegetation is necessary to facilitate the necessary storage of water in the water management area. xiv. Projects within the Neighborhood Center Subdistrict that are submitted as PUDs shall provide a functional public open-space component. Such public open-space shall be developed as green space within a pedestrian-accessible courtyard, as per Section 4.06.03B. of the Collier County Land Development Code, as in effect at the time of P.U.D. approval. xv. The following principal permitted uses are prohibited within Neighborhood Centers: a. Drinking Places (5813) and Liquor Stores (5921) b. Mail Order Houses (5961) c.Merchandizing Machine Operators (5962) d. Power Laundries (7211) e. Crematories (7261) (Does not include non-crematory Funeral Parlors) f. Radio, TV Representatives (7313) and Direct Mail Advertising Services (7331) g. NEC Recreational Shooting Ranges, Waterslides, etc. (7999) h. General Hospitals (8062), Psychiatric Hospitals (8063), and Specialty Hospitals (8069) i. Elementary and Secondary Schools (8211), Colleges (8221), Junior Colleges (8222) j. Libraries (8231) k.Correctional Institutions (9223) I. Waste Management (9511) m. Homeless Shelters and Soup Kitchens. 3. Conditional Uses Subdistrict Various types of conditional uses are permitted in the Estates zoning district within the Urban Golden Gate Estates area. In order to control the location and spacing of new conditional uses, one of the following four sets of criteria shall be met: a. Essential Services Conditional Use Provisions: 12 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 15 of 32 Those Essential Services Conditional Uses, as identified within Section 2.01.03 G. of the Collier County Land Development Code, may be allowed anywhere within the Estates Zoning District, except as prohibited in certain Neighborhood Centers, and are described as: 1. electric or gas generating plants, 2. effluent tanks, 3. major re-pump stations, 4. sewage treatment plants, including percolation ponds, 5. hospitals and hospices, 6. water aeration or treatment plants, 7. governmental facilities (except for those Permitted Uses identified in Section 2.01.03 of the Land Development Code), 8. public water supply acquisition, withdrawal, or extraction facilities, and 9. public safety service facilities, and other similar facilities. b. Golden Gate Parkway and Collier Boulevard Special Provisions: 1. Recognizing the existing residential nature of the land uses surrounding the I- 75 interchange at Golden Gate Parkway, there shall be no further conditional uses for properties abutting Golden Gate Parkway, between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard, except: as permitted within the Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict and the Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict; as provided in subparagraphs 3. and 5. below; for the properties identified as Unit 30 Tracts 113-115 and the N 150' of tract 116 that have existing Conditional Uses; and, for essential services, as described in paragraph a., above. 2. Further, no properties abutting streets accessing Golden Gate Parkway, between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard, shall be approved for conditional uses except: as permitted within the Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict; as provided in subparagraph 3. below; and, for essential services, as described in paragraph a. above. 3. In consideration of the improvements associated with the interchange at Interstate 75 and Golden Gate Parkway, the existing conditional use (church and related facilities) located at the southeast corner of Golden Gate Parkway and 66th Street S.W. may be expanded in acreage and intensity along the south side of Golden Gate Parkway to the east of 66th Street S.W., but the total project area shall not exceed approximately 9.22 acres (see Golden Gate Parkway Interchange Conditional Uses Area Map). 4. The parcel located immediately south of the Commercial Western Estates Infill Subdistrict, on the west side of Collier Boulevard, and at the southwest quadrant of the intersection of Vanderbilt Beach Road and Collier Boulevard, shall be eligible for a transitional conditional use designation. 5. Conditional use for expansion of the existing educational and charitable social organization (Naples Bridge Center) is allowed on the east 150 feet of Tract 75 and the west 150 feet of Tract 82, Unit 30, Golden Gate Estates. The maximum building area permitted on the two parcels shall be limited to 15,000 square feet. Use of Tract 82 shall be limited to parking, water management and open space uses. See Conditional Uses Subdistrict Golden Gate Parkway Special Provisions map. 13 -� The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 16 of 32 6. The property located on Collier Boulevard identified as Golden Gate Estates Unit 1, north 150 feet of TR 114, less right-of-way, shall be eligible for Conditional Use. c. Neighborhood Center Transitional Conditional Use Provisions: Conditional uses shall be allowed immediately adjacent to designated Neighborhood Centers subject to the following criteria: 1. Properties eligible for conditional uses shall abut the arterial or collector road serving the Neighborhood Center, 2. Such uses shall be limited to transitional conditional uses that are compatible with both residential and commercial such as neighborhood churches, social or fraternal organizations, childcare centers, schools, and group care facilities, 3. All conditional uses shall make provisions for shared parking arrangements with adjoining developments whenever possible, 4. Conditional uses abutting Estates zoned property shall provide, at a minimum, a 75-foot buffer of native vegetation in which no parking or water management uses are permitted, 5. Conditional uses adjoining the commercial uses within Neighborhood Centers shall, whenever possible, share parking areas, access and curb cuts with the adjoining commercial use, in order to facilitate traffic movement. d. Transitional Conditional Uses: Conditional uses may be granted in Transitional Areas. A Transitional Area is defined as an area located between existing non-residential and residential areas. The purpose of this provision is to allow conditional uses in areas that are adjacent to existing non-residential uses and are therefore generally not appropriate for residential use. The conditional use will act as a buffer between non-residential and residential areas. The following criteria shall apply for Transitional Conditional Use requests: 1. Site shall be directly adjacent to a non-residential use (zoned or developed); 2. Site shall be 2.25 acres, or more, in size or be at least 150 feet in width and shall not exceed 5 acres; 3. Site abutting Estates zoned property without an approved conditional use shall provide, at a minimum, a 75-foot buffer of native vegetation in which no parking or water management uses are permitted; 4. Site shall not be adjacent to a church or other place of worship, school, social or fraternal organization, child care center, convalescent home, hospice, rest home, home for the aged, adult foster home, children's home, rehabilitation centers; 5. Site shall not be adjacent to parks or open space and recreational uses; and 6. Site shall not be adjacent to permitted (by right) Essential Service uses, as identified in Section 2.01.03 of the Land Development Code, except may be located adjacent to libraries and museums. and electrical substationG. e. Special Exceptions to Conditional Use Locational Criteria: 1. Temporary use (TU) permits for model homes, as defined in the Collier County Land Development Code, may be allowed anywhere within the Estates-Mixed Use District. Conditional use permits for the purpose of extending the time period for use of the structure as a model home shall be required, and shall be subject to the provisions of Section 5.04.04B. and C. of the Collier County Land Development 14 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 17 of 32 Code, Ordinance No. 04-41, as amended. Such conditional uses shall not be subject to the locational criteria of the Conditional Uses Subdistrict, and may be allowed anywhere within the Estates-Mixed Use District. 2. Conditional Use permits for excavation, as provided for in the Estates zoning district, are not subject to the locational criteria for Conditional Uses and may be allowed anywhere within the Estates-Mixed Use District. 3. Conditional Use for a church or place of worship, as provided for in the Estates zoning district, is allowed on Tract 22, Golden Gate Estates, Unit 97 (See Special Exception to Conditional Use Location Criteria Map). 4. Conditional Use for a church or place of worship as allowed in the Estates Zoning District is allowed on the north 180 feet of Tract 107, Unit 30, Golden Gate Estates. Church-related day care use shall not be allowed. Development shall be limited to a maximum of 12,000 square feet of floor area (See Special Exception to Conditional Use Location Criteria Map). 5. Conditional Use for a cellular tower is allowed in the Estates Zoning District only on parcels no smaller than 2.25 acres and adjacent to a roadway classified within the Transportation Element as a Collector or Arterial. 4. Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict This Subdistrict is specific to Tracts 43, 50, 59, and 66 of Golden Gate Estates Unit 30, and includes four parcels of land containing approximately 16.3 acres, located on the north side of Golden Gate Parkway, east of 1-75 and west of Santa Barbara Boulevard. The intent of the Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict is to provide for the continued operation of existing uses, and the development and redevelopment of institutional and related uses. The Subdistrict is intended to be compatible with the neighboring residential uses and will utilize well-planned access points to ensure safe and convenient access onto Golden Gate Parkway. The following institutional uses are permitted through the conditional use process within the Subdistrict: a. Neighborhood churches and other places of worship. b. Group care facilities (Categories I and II) c. Nursing homes and assisted living facilities associated with the David Lawrence Center. d. Essential services as set forth in Section 2.01.03 of the Collier County Land Development Code, Ordinance No. 04-41, as amended. e. Private schools associated with the David Lawrence Center or Parkway Community Church of God, for Tracts 43, 50 and 59 only. f. Day care centers associated with the David Lawrence Center or Parkway Community Church of God. g. Medical offices associated with the David Lawrence Center. B. Estates —Commercial District 1. Interchange Activity Center Subdistrict On the fringes of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan boundaries, there are several parcels that are located within the Interchange Activity Center #10 at 1-75 and Pine Ridge Road as 15 -� The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 18 of 32 detailed in the County-wide Future Land Use Element (FLUE). Parcels within this Activity Center are subject to the County-wide FLUE and not this Master Plan. See Activity Center and Pine Ridge Road Mixed Use Subdistrict Map for a detailed map of this Activity Center. 2. Pine Ridge Road Mixed Use Subdistrict This Subdistrict is adjacent to the northwest quadrant of Interchange Activity Center#10, west of the Naples Gateway PUD, and comprises 16.23 acres. It consists of Tracts 1, 12, 13 and 28 of Golden Gate Estates, Unit 35, as recorded in Plat Book 7, Page 85, of the Public Records of Collier County. The intent of the Pine Ridge Road Mixed Use Subdistrict is to allow for a mix of both retail and office uses to provide for shopping and personal services for the surrounding residential areas within a convenient travel distance and to provide commercial services appropriately located along a collector roadway, Livingston Road. Well-planned access points will be used to improve current and future traffic flows in the area. Within this Subdistrict no more than 35,000 square feet of office-related uses on +3.2 acres are permitted within the eastern portion of this property, which includes a portion of Tract 28 and a portion of Tract 13. A maximum of 80,000 square feet of gross leasable retail or office area, as allowed in the Commercial Intermediate District (C-3) of the Collier County Land Development Code in effect as of the effective date of the adoption of this Subdistrict [Ordinance No. 03-01, adopted January 16, 2003], are permitted within the western 10.52 acres of this property. The C-3 uses are not an entitlement. Such uses will be further evaluated at the time of rezoning application to insure appropriateness in relationship to surrounding properties. A rezoning of the western 10.52 acres is encouraged to be in the form of a Planned Unit Development. Regulations for water management, uniform landscaping, signage, screening and buffering will be included in the rezoning ordinance to ensure compatibility with nearby residential areas, and shall be subject to the following additional criteria: a. There shall be no access onto Livingston Woods Lane. b. Shared access shall be encouraged. c.Building heights shall not exceed 35 feet. d. There shall be a minimum setback area of 75 feet along the northern property line. e. Driveway access, parking, and water management facilities may be allowed within the 75-foot setback area along the northern property line, but none of these uses shall be located closer than 30 feet to this line. f. No freestanding automobile parking lots, homeless shelters or soup kitchens shall be permitted. g. Within the eastern portion of Tract 28, 2.2 acres, more or less, shall be preserved as wetlands and no development shall occur within that area. h. Within the western 10.52 acres, a loop road shall be constructed through the property to provide access from Pine Ridge Road to Livingston Road and to reduce traffic at the intersection. See Activity Center and Pine Ridge Road Mixed Use Subdistrict Map for a detailed map of this Subdistrict. 3. Commercial Western Estates Infill Subdistrict The purpose of the Subdistrict is to allow for limited commercial and/or medical office uses, in recognition of the subject property's unsuitability for single-family residential development. Limited commercial and/or medical uses at this location will also assist in reducing the distance and the number of vehicular trips generated within the general area through trip 16 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 19 of 32 capture. The standards contained in this Subdistrict are designed to ensure that uses within ..� the Subdistrict will be compatible with nearby residential development. A loop road shall be required through the property to connect Vanderbilt Beach Road with Collier Boulevard will also serve to lessen vehicular trips through the intersection. a. Size and Location: The Subdistrict includes a 6.23-acre parcel, located at the southwest corner of Vanderbilt Beach Road and Collier Boulevard (see Commercial Western Estates Infill Subdistrict Map). The parcel is identified as Tract 105, Unit 2, Golden Gate Estates. b. Permitted Uses and Development Intensity: Within the subject property, 3.93 acres of office/medical use is permitted with a maximum of forty-one thousand four hundred and ninety(41,490)square feet of gross leaseable area permitted or approximately 6,660 square feet per gross acre. The balance of the area, comprising +2.3 acres, shall remain in open space. Uses allowed within this Subdistrict shall be those office uses, medical uses,and financial institutions permitted whether by right or by conditional use, within the C-1 zoning district, as contained in the Collier County Land Development Code, Ordinance 91-102, as of the effective date of the adoption of this Subdistrict [Ordinance No. 03-01, adopted January 16, 2003]. c. Development Standards: 1. All permitted uses within this Subdistrict shall be encouraged to be submitted in the form of a Planned Unit Development (P.U.D.) for the subject property with special attention to be provided for shared access, water management, uniform landscaping, signage, screening and buffering to ensure compatibility with nearby residential areas. -� 2. Building height shall be limited to two stories, with a maximum height of thirty (30) feet, except that portions of the property within one hundred (100) feet of the buffer described in item #3, below, shall be limited to one story with a maximum height of twenty-five (25)feet. 3. There shall be a setback of seventy-five (75)feet in width abutting Estates- zoned property. Where feasible, existing native vegetation shall be retained within this setback area. Water retention/detention areas shall be allowed in this setback area provided that the area is left in a natural state, and drainage conveyance through the setback area shall be allowed, as necessary, in order for stormwater to reach an external outfall. 4. The buffer area along Collier Boulevard/CR-951 and Vanderbilt Beach Road shall be 25 feet in width and shall conform to the vegetative requirements of a Type "B" buffer as provided for in the Collier County Land Development Code, in effect as of the date of adoption of this amendment [Ordinance No. 03-01, adopted January 16, 2003].A loop road shall be constructed, internal to the subject property. This road shall be open to the public, in order to connect Vanderbilt Beach Road and Collier Boulevard, so as to provide an alternative to use of the intersection. 5. The maximum gross leaseable floor area of each individual office/medical/financial building footprint shall be 6,000 square feet. However, buildings may be connected by architectural treatments, and shall be designed to appear similar to residential structures through the treatment of rooflines and other architectural embellishments. 17 -� The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 20 of 32 6. No development of property within the Subdistrict shall commence until the abutting segment of Collier Boulevard is four-laned. 4. Urban Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict This Subdistrict consists of two infill areas. The two areas are located at the northwest corner of Collier Boulevard and Green Boulevard and at the northwest corner of Santa Barbara Boulevard and Golden Gate Parkway. Due to the existing zoning and land use pattern in proximity to the Estates Commercial In-fill Subdistrict (Urban Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict Map) and the need to ensure adequate development standards to buffer adjacent land uses, commercial uses shall be permitted under the following criteria: a. Commercial uses shall be limited to: 1. Low intensity commercial uses that are compatible with both residential and intermediate commercial uses, in order to provide for small scale shopping and personal needs, and 2. Intermediate commercial to provide for a wider variety of goods and services in areas that have a higher degree of automobile traffic. These uses shall be similar to C-1, C-2, or C-3 zoning districts outlined in the Collier County Land Development Code (Ordinance 91-102), adopted October 30, 1991. b. Rezones shall be encouraged in the form of a Planned Unit Development (there shall be no minimum acreage requirement for PUD rezones except for the requirement that all requests for rezoning must be at least forty thousand (40,000) square feet in area unless the proposed rezone is an extension of an existing zoning district consistent with the Golden Gate Area Master Plan). c. Projects within this Subdistrict shall make provisions for shared parking arrangements with adjoining commercial developments when appropriate. �-- d. Driveways and curb cuts for projects within this Subdistrict shall be consolidated with adjoining commercial developments. e. Access to projects shall not be permitted from Collier Boulevard. f. Any project located within this Subdistrict at the northwest corner of Golden Gate Parkway and Santa Barbara Boulevard, less and except an easement for Santa Barbara Boulevard right-of-way, shall be subject to the following additional development restrictions: 1. The site shall be limited to thirty-five thousand (35,000) square feet of building area. 2. Land uses shall be restricted to offices only. 3. All principal structures shall be required to have a minimum setback of one hundred (100)feet from the project's northern boundary. 4. The northern seventy-five (75)feet of the western sixty (60) percent of the site shall be a green area (open space area). It shall be utilized for only water management facilities, landscape buffers, and similar uses. 5. The western sixty(60) percent of the site shall have an outdoor pedestrian- friendly patio(s), that total at least five hundred (500) square feet in area and incorporate a minimum of: benches or seating areas for at least twelve (12) persons, and vegetative shading, and a waterfall or water feature of at least one hundred (100) square feet in area, and brick pavers. 6. A twenty-five (25) foot wide landscaped strip shall be provided along the entire frontage of both Golden Gate Parkway and Santa Barbara Boulevard. 18 �... The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 21 of 32 7. A minimum buffer of thirty-five (35)feet in width shall be provided along the a.® project's western boundary and along the eastern forty (40) percent of the project's northern boundary. A minimum buffer of fifty (50) feet in width shall be provided along the western sixty (60) percent of the project's northern boundary. Where feasible, existing native vegetation shall be retained within these buffers along the project's western and northern boundaries. These buffers shall be supplemented with Oak or Mahogany trees planted a maximum of twenty (20) feet apart in a staggered manner; and a seven (7) foot wall, fence, or hedge that will, within two (2) years of planting, grow to a minimum height of seven (7)feet and be a minimum of ninety-five (95) percent opaque. 8. All buildings shall have tile or metal roofs, or decorative parapet walls above the roofline, and buildings shall be finished in light subdued colors except for decorative trim. 9. Building heights shall be limited to one (1)-story and a maximum of thirty- five (35) feet. 10. All lighting facilities shall be architecturally designed, and limited to a height of twenty-five (25) feet. Such lighting facilities shall be shielded from neighboring residential land uses. 11. There shall be no ingress or egress on Santa Barbara Boulevard. 5. Southbrooke Office Subdistrict The Southbrooke Office Subdistrict is approximately five (5) acres and is located approximately 1/4 mile east of Oakes Boulevard on the south side of Immokalee Road. he intent of the subdistrict is to permit general office, medical office, and business service uses generally consistent with those uses permissible by right, or as a conditional use in the C-1 Commercial Professional and General Office zoning district. Development within the Subdistrict is encouraged to be rezoned as a PUD in order to provide greater specificity of permitted land uses, development standards and any necessary operational characteristics. A maximum of 40,000 square feet of commercial development shall be permitted. All buildings will be limited to single-story, and shall be constructed in a common architectural theme. A minimum 30 feet in width vegetated buffer shall be provided adjacent to Autumn Oaks Lane, which shall consist of retained native vegetation. Access to the Subdistrict shall only be from Immokalee Road. C. LIST OF MAPS Urban Golden Gate Estates Future Land Use Map Urban Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict Pine Ridge Road Interchange Activity Center and Pine Ridge Road Mixed Use Subdistrict Urban Golden Gate Estates Neighborhood Center Collier Boulevard/Pine Ridge Road Center Commercial Western Estates Infill Subdistrict Golden Gate Parkway Interchange Conditional Uses Area Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict Southbrooke Office Subdistrict Conditional Uses Subdistrict: Golden Gate Parkway Special Provisions Special Exceptions to Conditional Use Locational Criteria in Golden Gate Estates 19 --� The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 22 of 32 ESTATES DESIGNATION MIXED USE DISTRICT COMMERCIAL DISTRICT " ` '"rnc=.= URBAN GOLDEN GATE ESTATES Condeonai Uses Seeds. `' m"° " �``�' FUTURE LAND USE MAP CO o Osessn Gmetresse Spa Rouses. IMI.„.boo.sORssSum.. Cr 1— MOTE IMMOKALEE RD -11 IMMOKALEE RD i z I0 W z 0 , J Z VANDERBILT I H j BEACH RD a z 0z GOLDEN GATE BLVD --1 cC Q 0 I J PINE RIDGE RD1, •' Ir" I a cc GREEN BLVD ; ; 0 z O —, F m Z 0 L w 0 Z n _, cc 50 O W CO 0 1— PKWY �� Nor • C/3 ii voi (n 'a z o2Z 73 J RADIO RD INTERSTATE 75 D n. F- = O N a cn cC Z DAVIS BLVD 0 cc z cc m URBAN GOLDEN GATE U1 FUTURE LAND USE MAP ADOPTED-XXX X,2019 O 0 0 0.5 1 2 s Miles RATTLESNAKE H'MMOCK RD "E up I�4•�ES•h5 ayu� R 26 E I R 27 E I R 28 E I R 29 E __ o�s'o i. mm v Q ___... .._y......_ .._._ n m t, _.. 1 _ ._ m _ Y+ .. .. FA, o m G1 ._ ..Y' _- _"'� o o J w m D s c . p m r v• 3 ait g N m ._ a ..._ r —-. ° CO o _ r z r 3 r ._... co a� _ Q o 9o 9C o 4. .‹ o N '- \ n Santa Barbara BLVD r- 'n -- — Tro.i0>WAY TropicalWAY . m m ,0 55thT RSW 55th TER SW m -<o ' n Logan LT s 55th ST SW l_ 55th ST SW S i r - Os 'n f 4 54th TER SW v 54th TER SW I -I — 9 "' r. r I. 1 al ''` 4 F _ 54th ST SW 4 D N — O 4 '4 s� N v v 59th STS ,. `L ..._, c u O 4F' N2L Soy D = n rn 53rd LN SW .___ _ _. MS _PWS la �� J1L MS i`'U m n 1 9 `J rd S7 SW .. 2�`A E. _—__.,..._. .44 O 4e a = '94 � m ` 5 S NPZr < =° ........ ._.._._..........................._.__...___......�.....__............ ...... 4) � �'% -&''iF . 520 TER SW m 3 O s 2p, L S ti — N < Hunter BLVD ilifSILSsllhLLL '5 eJ1y - O 10,''C'' wa 51st TER SW FRS� ril 109 , r� n =_ 71 ,c, ( en 51st ST SW N ST SW CD s y5.h TER SW f ti 4 S " V50th TERS a61„,.. 4. S b1314105 tr Qs 50th STSW. S 105 - y ..._. Q hq h5S 1 yj6Q F m s V • . -.-< R W 49th LN SW y \ a- CP a T m• m r N N 49th ST SW S' _'" E f _ '� ���,-..II p 100Q`y 4 d4 48th ST SW l+I yz 48th TER SV OC 9( n C4 et Sun nine BLVD l l m zo o' IL' ^ 46thT SW A ° 46th TER SW _ H 4 47th TER SW c, ' n v i M 9 66th ST SW 't 465 ST SW r 47th ST SW ,Se m 0tri v N 65 h TER SW D M 1 - T 65th TER SW z D > h m 3 mPIM n N I 1 m Z m » d5t'I ST 9N C 0 45th ST SW m 1-y Om1001° 0' s 44 hTERSWm n yz 7 < m H m NK '�a�lySCmam MS a 7,7 ^ K 43.TER SW LS 4. m f CD m N No oa a a {,r" M MS 3131 Pt£1+ i ~ (/] o ca 0 s, m y u 8 43rd ST SW Ow m S 'Q CO W N m 942nd TER SW 3 v [31;,. m g f n m r m ¢ r - h--i r. a `Jr 9y 2 m N ._♦m < N 42nd S7' . .' S 42nd ST SW v 41st 41st TER SW TER SW v g H 1 41st 5"SW -r15-m m 41 st ST SW Gol L �< yH $ 40th TER Sal \ 1 '' Salt ALY 0 CIA-1E1Je!11o3 _ ColllerILVD 39th ST SW -171 ai —M C til ci)m w CO @nom .._.. < D m a ' }- c m < N O m _m __._ m _. m C.' m ppr 71m —m . URBAN GOLDEN GATE ESTATES NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER Collier County, Florida t� IMMOKALEE RD V ti VANDERBILT BEACH RD D Lf) � o J m GOLDEN GATE BLVD z z a 0 -J CDz -J 1 PINE RIDGE RD a a CLO z 0 GREEN BLVD co Q ~ C7 z w LC) J N- CC1 J O O GOLDEN G TE PKWY 1-75 N AMENDED-SEPTEMBER 10,2003 (Ord.No.2003-44) URBAN GOLDEN GATE ESTATES AMENDED-OCTOBER 26,2004 NEIGHBORHOOD CENTERS (Ord.No.2004-71) LEGEND AMENDED-JANUARY 25,2007 0 0.5 1 2 3 (Ord.No.2007-19) ® URBAN GOLDEN GATE ESTATES NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER Miles AMENDED-OCTOBER 14,2008 (Ord.No.2008-59) PREPARED BY:BETH YANG,AICP AMENDED-SEPTEMBER 14,2011 GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT FILE:Urban Golden Gate Estates Neighborhood Centers.mxd (Ord.No.2011-29) GMPRP'PL002U1/30000261 08/15/2019 Page 25 of 32 COLLIER BOULEVARD/PINE RIDGE ROAD CENTER --1 Collier County, Florida V NT BEACH ROAD EXT. 1:4 D G T :O D 7//i C7 a PINE RIDG :• ' • / I' • V R 4 / Af / —._ • LA F go / g L 1 F � / ADOPTED — SEPTEMBER 10, 2003 LEGEND (Ord. No. 2003-44) AMENDED — JANUARY 25, 2007 (Ord. No. 2007-19) AMENDED — OCTOBER 14, 2008 (Ord. No. 2008-59) J 7 GOLDEN GATE NEIGHBORHOOD / ESTATES CENTER I I I 0 1/2 MI. 1 MI. PREPARED BY: GRAPHICS AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT SECTION COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION ALE: GGMP-48-2008-1.DWG DATE: 10/2008 GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 26 of 32 COMMERCIAL WESTERN ESTATES INFILL SUBDISTRICT Collier County, Florida N NAPLES-IMMOKALEE ROAD F / A E Q Do a COMMERCIAL E. WESTERN ESTATES °m INFILL SUBDISTRICT 0 \ • BB LT BEACH ROAD EAT./:2/2/7//// /G7 O L � / PINE RIDG .'0 ►//;/, ///, AMENDED - SEPTEMBER 10, 2003 (Ord. No. 2003-44) LEGEND AMENDED - OCTOBER 26, 2004 (Ord. No. 2004-71) AMENDED - JANUARY 25, 2007 (Ord. No. 2007-19) AMENDED - OCTOBER 14, 2008 (Ord. No. 2008-59) GOLDEN GATE ESTATES I I I 0 1/2 MI. 1 MI. PREPARED BY: GRAPHICS AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT SECTION COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION FILE: GGMP-48-2008-1.DWG DATE: 10/2008 GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 27 of 32 GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY INTERCHANGE CONDITIONAL USES AREA —o Collier County, Florida 7//i 0 .. i a PINE RIDGE ROAD / ✓ :, / X,/ s//i/77 1. .: / / E A w w e / x x PI GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY / ' 41 Q Q '.L o 0 ' x z GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY a INTERCHANGE CONDITIONAL w USES AREA E. RADIO ROAD 0 a. /.I. 1 Q DAVIS BOULEVARD EXT. ADOPTED — SEPTEMBER 10, 2003 LEGEND (Ord. No. 2003-44) AMENDED — JANUARY 25, 2007 (Ord. No. 2007-19) AMENDED — OCTOBER 14, 2008 (Ord. No. 2008-59) GOLDEN GATE / ESTATES I I I —... 0 1/2 MI. 1 MI. PREPARED BY: GRAPHICS AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT SECTION COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION FILE: GGMP-49-2008-1.DWG DATE: 10/2008 GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 28 of 32 I DOA Ca fZm � jo N O m o O{ 0 `/ O 0 Fi2E ,N 1Zz 0 0 N 1 I 0 m m o Z o 5 z 62th ST SW 62th ST SW rn0- m Z D O m r Z OV D-0 w kJ J iT U N O mA x ti O N nm • m 00 <Z N �••) 0 W W u-, 111 Z W A O t:/ rii • 4, N a v H o _ LTJ 0 0 'd a Z r Pi • P1 4,m n o x n co Z D N m Z o m a J W 0 C 0 *v v A 60th ST SW D W m m --...14, m C > /--4 N r 7 o -D >— U) 003 f coD m H U X H D H 0 z 03 • 0 r J 0 — Is) — I� O N O nti m — ➢ /I-1� .1 V1 J 03 - U) aF�y� 0 rV O H/�y O — \) 71 I H coE — I w I— 58th ST SW t" I I . u") tii 0 o d `... c7, 5 d SOUTHBROOKE OFFICE SUBDISTRICT Collier County, Florida IMMOKALEE ROAD SOUTHBROOKE / OFFICE SUBDISTRICT VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD / J '0 6 „ 'A :s L '`D i 7/ z ////:////////////////7/ PINE RIDGE H B� 'D /// / "g N F- A,/ I- 0 V) o fY CY J a W > Z CO J D Q 0 CY m Q M CY 0 i 4 P' V P:"p/ <t:3 W ja o N LEGEND AMENDED — NOVEMBER 10, 2015 (Ord. No. 2015-62) GOLDEN GATE SOUTHBROOKE SUBDI V ESTATES Q SUB „� DISTRICT PREPARED BY: GIS/CAD MAPPING SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NTS FILE: CPSS-2014-4A-1.DWG DATE: 1-2016 GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 30 of 32 0G)7.1 1 0m O 1D N=m 0_30 y 0 0 °m c, f 1 13 Tro_co o� 77 ,0- ��o e4, 00 m J NJ 0 41 0N)3_, ay r i NCNn z 0 l Y i _.. p iiiLlp. • T18 2 ,.., /- r Z_._...___..._..._.___. D 0 ...,,' % --1 ?.4 = z i _ m J 0td o D _ I '�� X Il �{ C/1 0 17 _ N N - o - p t'' n 4_ 1 s o 0 _ -- ,n _ i 1 p O % / 0 d O — C l I co 'anis t/82it1 ' IN ' Si Z Z II 1 I � r __... i t I 1 1 II 1. ; H -H - H b 1 1 MI II 1 r am mg um o ? /la .1 \I\ II S'S SO", tili — HY I I is c7 1 — I- 111010 \''' i i• %,,.. il trilli$\iko 0 lee n 0 1 - II Ip:J mOO � o-4 z -}- �"D�°z CQ 1 !-H- -- ( JI ( LfTL44#¼ . 4. 4 p — c = -<: -=' - 3 _, �m \y •i 0 1 En 7J 0 71 SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS TO CONDITIONAL USE LOCATIONAL CRITERIA IN GOLDEN GATE ESTATES IMNOKALEE RD Legend "� .. ,o leo 2,53`5u ur15 cos. ,,,a.01,9 1 - .. 18 17 24 ° rz es 92"' Conditional Use Exceptions ts se 63Bcr Ga ..v,45 14 27 4.1fs6 0a a L." ....�39,6 .w.1 Tract 22, Unit 97 8 33 'A6477815717 34 "Oaken Oa;s�� w 43 958376633910. 31455 i s5.se se .�s� v 12 Standig Da k 11. 3914 m 1 839 rr w O 4 14id To:6 L.m' 42`2,1 3I Z 4255 m 7,'583 091Ls 183 CA 'm E'Sr OBkBlN 91 ,\ E m cs 76 m „rn \` 2BEnOak6 N.. 1615 7 25 �lih s ' Va dtbJtBa.L a''''"" 9.T BEACH RD 2966924x83 17355345@ 2 m m m 39571,3,13,3 u-71Wood DR VANDER8 'th 2.AVE NJJm + 4e a 627576 m 94107105121+52 7 10 25 a 5342632 n 74 w 9010 e3+344763 m 63768339 11„0427.= 1 94 47 56 04 14 n w 95106108 mm,02 19 0-5 m m 4°s m m m m 63 2373+29.= 12 7 u Hicaory Wood CRt04na ° nun !43thA S _,,0 rYn 41 n 64 73 m m 3910916119124 5 12 21 83 35 44 53 m 63 x - — 20 a x m s 4s 1 63 93—10610911615642-- i - '1383 °'m°'ro`,n,212s 4 12'76 4530, �� —355335«53563553 m1„o62l „7 '42 CCI Wood DBt 1 x;4d ASE 7 757 6i -41,424441—22 27 m 40 54.m ro 75 63 m 70210?,1s1235 - 2 Vol : 33 93 55 58 71 er2 87 913 103112117 156 3 14 19 33 35 46 51 52 63 94 f9 m m Taal Wood D?i0Pa,m m z 1 , ,554 s7 AVE NW'2* a 39>B*n m z,r4*m,or,o6,la,za— s as =2_e- 83®63� 411512e Ian 535545 358383 ,20° u m 40 a 2 n>x n m 6565910.5.21, x ;g ---.' y,5. 6 52425psp,,,,n,�,mm, —,53a4645mmmm9971a„a°s,e es n 65 93 2"63 83$1 Sina a�ac 207,21:2.1 d tN°6183,0„ �h�9 3nV R'C94 &c 7,,16 76 39.0.3.'0 7.2 ro —9 m x,6 m m m 76 m 2 2,1,,,.274= 51 62,67 28+ 41979,955 mels.2 39,083, xmammmn51 67 78 m 92 fl51uq 1oe 6i2' r3E Ay,i'romm '��—ma 53,9138383715483,07183,e,,— %53 �� ea 12 m m 831 m 2963 m 2s Si bla Ricga34 35 93 55 06 7LN® -4Imetlo Waois D2 3918311° vel 8344 ss 83183 C a m m49m5nm3967.01 .. 41 42 m m 6376636397104111 11 35 m m 54, 2 A\.E S1/ 049310c„J—s,xa.453mm76m9:m,105.n,26,— 6. 4 2+4 But lebn.25 35 41 M st W m m 0 64 73 211 ��,, m:amapir s aidga DF®,831, : ,4,9 83 63 63 s,e e 76 m w a.s�— 35 m u 04 m 75 76 63 83,05107 �� s 10 IS x 5142 47 m 6374 n m 39103 03 n u 4657 m 7174 m 653102115 2 ,516 51 246tY AVESW 0263 63 12.,742m —21633542555571745790113.,06119,2z— 22 g«onHood: ,. g a,a3cmoreCRm 263®m B6 39 •,mv rz76m5,040. P , % ` —... m,xa7 n 62 93i INE RIDGE RD --'0 41m m m0410512.21 RneRimro nRa 75 76 39w5. 71283557'04 m753 38 17 16 1 15 E - -22 4 22 m , m n*222 62 95 111 n25.260rews 2 m m a 550 35 83 }Napa W�9 WAY°5' �o kwood 4eo 34B1+ewzm 2 2 2 m rz 76 39 :45—'5 4'"'"22'''''' +off / 11 404313 m rz 712 m,a,�n 35n 's4.a m 75 a m 40210077„5rzs m m 53 n m lit,'((N'5029 � "6�'^44,14-44142 2912.0.02 mlm m m 9457 a 65 83 53 4 ° 271 a ,gid WFY 1,, 04al:,oal WAY , 41 an.4454s47 48253 39113511166 —9 5 1445353945545415173583103109„5 x4555612 n 283100183 4033 m m x 138`1 35E£Wm 0— .'41114109,3987 70 + m 55 46 51 62'En 78 89 94 M 110 ri 1 4 14 21 m 67,4222 1C 6„50,7WY '°' Y 04„„,83Wood,,WM, 21 esm554z5xa am63 711 46,9374„039 63 n5.%u 33 22; a x3139 47@4465792 , 111119 1 a mm m x 8395°°711, a95 1171 ,s': "101606444-221. —imawml199 m x 67544°mm 10 7— P " 151„92E4 gp 6 15 1124115 2 31 12 a x 452267 m 839639 G 04 buvuma 48 49 283 mm 39971,°x1 251 2I 4j4I s 5 7 0.9 1012912715.24 1,2115112976375 85 53.621205 e 15mm49m2,mmm°739—,CD"` 411.11,MIMMO 185 „ 050mmm0 10 6341222502— i` 40Ceda Tee CN 63;o � 161 ��- 170 CM 3;;; 76 an;11�1. -II11 •1111 + mmxx 42 mmn7. 5. o 55 rt '�n 6 „ 39W.s L63m° �1401•0"Mi. 8371p z 9,7«7976,7717m796mm1641,2, 63 3NT, `� ' ' 00.11.1 C9, mu mamSe6ps.LN fliO4". ` f � •�115 ,,3049mmm66248 4s 24 21 z ,w 2a 651636776®94394 718368383832 47 1 55839 ne a212'2m25ar,rssLN 39B° as North 180 feet of — 141m9mro6383 41X19. 177 63925383 26683°'392 Tract 107, Unit 30. — ' , 17 16 18 45 m 76 3 -1 1p 11 35 m m o,.psr 7e;r,-,0 ' - R—�77190459403726150302517 e 175 7 174 7271 76 102 14 ,0 m m 2 Pal ted seat L 631" / �� —,s,.e,oa 39 m u m s a m s 6 m ro11 ai'S ,.,9x76 838327.838339— 111s� ° 91149172I► � 1� �r� — IEEE 8312 m n,53 ,,,ro 5.N+,9.2 ` 45 Z Q n y m __ 5,,6°159,5o16116416616«,em zo a a 62 1757© = 63 76 39 _= ,2 56,6 169 1 35 m m 61 63 83 L , 2 83 39 15 R - • PREPARED BY:BETH YANG,AICP (Ord.No.XXXX) GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT �-I 1- I Miles FILE:Special Exceptions to Conditional Use.mxd DATE:05/2018 N 0 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 32 of 32 Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element "Exhibit A" GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN RURAL GOLDEN GATE ESTATES SUB-ELEMENT Prepared by Collier County Zoning Division Prepared for COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Adopted (date) The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 1 of 42 Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element AMENDMENTS TO COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN: RURAL GOLDEN GATE ESTATES SUB-ELEMENT DATE AMENDED ORDINANCE NO. (date), 2019 2019-(#) The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 2 of 42 Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element TABLE OF CONTENTS Page A. Goals, Objectives and Policies 1 B. Land Use Designation Description Section 10 1. ESTATES DESIGNATION 10 A. Estates— Mixed Use District 1. Residential Estates Subdistrict 2. Neighborhood Center Subdistrict 3. Conditional Uses Subdistrict 4. Mission Subdistrict 5. Everglades— Randall Subdistrict B. Estates - Commercial District 17 1. Randall Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict 2. Estates Shopping Center Subdistrict 2. AGRICULTURE/RURAL DESIGNATION 27 A. Agricultural/Rural Settlement Area 27 3. OVERLAYS AND SPECIAL FEATURES 27 A. Southern Golden Gate Estates Natural Resource Protection Overlay 27 C. List of maps 28 �-- Rural Golden Gate Estates Future Land Use Map Rural Golden Gate Estates Neighborhood Centers Wilson Boulevard/Golden Gate Boulevard Center Golden Gate Boulevard/Everglades Boulevard Center Immokalee Road/Everglades Boulevard Center Randall Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict Mission Subdistrict Estates Shopping Center Subdistrict Estates Shopping Center Subdistrict Conceptual Plan Everglades— Randall Subdistrict Immokalee Road/Randall Boulevard Planning Study Area The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 3 of 42 A. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES GOAL 1: TO GUIDE LAND USE AND PUBLIC FACILITY DECISION MAKING AND TO BALANCE THE NEED TO PROVIDE BASIC SERVICES WITH NATURAL RESOURCE CONCERNS THROUGH A WELL PLANNED MIX OF COMPATIBLE LAND USES WHICH ENSURE THE HEALTH, SAFETY, WELFARE, AND QUALITY OF LIFE OF THE LOCAL RESIDENTS. OBJECTIVE 1.1: Develop new or revised uses of land consistent with designations outlined on the Rural Golden Gate Estates Future Land Use Map and provisions found in the Land Use Designation Description Section of this Sub-Element. Policy 1.1.1: The Policies under the above Objective shall identify the Future Land Use Designations, Districts, and Subdistricts for Rural Golden Gate Estates. Policy 1.1.2: The Land Use Designation Description Section of this Element shall provide the standards and permitted uses for Rural Golden Gate Estates Future Land Use Districts and Subdistricts. Policy 1.1.3: The Rural Golden Gate Estates Future Land Use Map and companion Future Land Use Designations, Districts, and Subdistricts shall be binding on all development orders unless otherwise permitted in this Master Plan effective with the adoption of this Master Plan. Policy 1.1.4: The ESTATES Future Land Use Designation shall include Future Land Use Districts and Subdistricts for: A. ESTATES— MIXED USE DISTRICT 1. Residential Estates Subdistrict 2. Neighborhood Center Subdistrict 3. Conditional Uses Subdistrict 4. Mission Subdistrict 5. Everglades— Randall Subdistrict B. ESTATES— COMMERCIAL DISTRICT 1. Randall Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict 2. Estates Shopping Center Subdistrict Policy 1.1.5: The AGRICULTURAL/RURAL Future Land Use Designation shall include the following Future Land Use District: A. RURAL SETTLEMENT AREA DISTRICT 1 ..� The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 4 of 42 Policy 1.1.6: Overlays and Special Features shall include: A. Southern Golden Gate Estates Natural Resource Protection Overlay Policy 1.1.7: Conditional Use requests within Rural Golden Gate Estates shall adhere to the guidelines outlined in the Conditional Uses Subdistrict. Policy 1.1.8: To obtain Conditional Use approval, a super majority vote (minimum of 4 votes) by the Board of Zoning Appeals shall be required. Policy 1.1.9: No development orders shall be issued inconsistent with the Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub- Element with the exception of those unimproved properties granted a positive determination through the Zoning Re-evaluation Program and identified on the Future Land Use Map Series as properties consistent by Policy and those development orders issued pursuant to conditional uses and rezones approved based on the County-Wide Future Land Use Element (adopted January 10, 1989, Ordinance 89-05) which was in effect at the time of approval. Any subsequent development orders shall also be reviewed for consistency with the Growth Management Plan based on the County-Wide Future Land Use Element. Policy 1.1.10: The sites containing existing public educational plants and ancillary plants, and the undeveloped sites owned by the Collier County School Board for future public educational plants and ancillary plants, within the Rural Golden Gate Estates area, are depicted on the Future Land Use Map Series in the countywide FLUE and on the Public School Facilities Element Map Series, and referenced in FLUE Policy 5.14 and Intergovernmental Coordination Element Policy 1.2.6. All of these sites are subject to the general Interlocal Agreement, adopted on May 15, 2003 by the Collier County School Board and on May 27, 2003 by the Board of County Commissioners, and as subsequently amended and restated, with an effective date of December 2008, and subject to the implementing land development regulations to be adopted. OBJECTIVE 1.2: Ensure public facilities are provided at an acceptable level of service. Policy 1.2.1: Requests for new uses of land shall be subject to level of service standards and concurrency requirements for public facilities as outlined in the Capital Improvement Element of the Growth Management Plan. OBJECTIVE 1.3: Protect and preserve the valuable natural resources within the Rural Golden Gate Estates. Policy 1.3.1: The County shall protect and preserve natural resources within the Rural Golden Gate Estates in accordance with the Objectives and Policies contained within Goals 6 and 7 of the Collier County Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME). 2 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 5 of 42 Policy 1.3.2: As provided for in CCME Policy 6.1.1, the subdivision of tracts up to 13 acres in size and designated Residential Estates Subdistrict shall not trigger preserve requirements. Policy 1.3.3: Collier County shall coordinate its planning and permitting activities within the Rural Golden Gate Estates with all other applicable environmental planning, permitting and regulatory agencies to ensure that all Federal, State and local natural resource protection regulations are being enforced. OBJECTIVE 1.4: Provide a living environment within the Rural Golden Gate Estates, which is aesthetically acceptable and protects the quality of life. Policy 1.4.1: Collier County shall provide a living environment that is aesthetically acceptable and protects the quality of life through the enforcement of applicable codes and laws. Policy 1.4.2: The County's Code Enforcement Board shall strictly enforce the Land Development Code and other applicable codes and laws to control the illegal storage of machinery, vehicles and junk, and the illegal operation of commercial activities within the Rural Golden Gate Estates. GOAL 2: TO RECOGNIZE THAT THE AREA WHICH LIES SOUTH OF INTERSTATE 75 (ALLIGATOR ALLEY) TO US 41 (TAMIAMI TRAIL) IS AN AREA OF SPECIAL ENVIRONMENTAL SENSITIVITY AND IS BIOLOGICALLY AND HYDROLOGICALLY IMPORTANT THROUGH PARTICIPATION IN THE PICAYUNE STRAND RESTORATION PROJECT AS PART OF THE FEDERAL SAVE OUR EVERGLADES PROGRAM. BASED UPON SUCH CONDITIONS, THE STATE HAS ACQUIRED OWNERSHIP OF ALL LANDS WITHIN THE SOUTHERN GOLDEN GATE ESTATES (SGGE) PICAYUNE STRAND RESTORATION PROJECT AREA. GOAL 3: TO PROVIDE FOR LIMITED COMMERCIAL SERVICES AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR PURPOSES OF SERVING THE RURAL NEEDS OF GOLDEN GATE ESTATES RESIDENTS, SHORTENING VEHICULAR TRIPS, AND PRESERVING RURAL CHARACTER. OBJECTIVE 3.1: Meet the locational and rural design criteria contained within the Estates Designation, Estates- Mixed Use District, Neighborhood Center Subdistrict and Conditional Use Subdistrict of this Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element, of the Collier County Growth Management Plan when considering the placement and designation of Neighborhood Centers and Conditional Uses within Rural Golden Gate Estates. Policy 3.1.1: Neighborhood Centers within Rural Golden Gate Estates shall be subject to the locational and rural design criteria established within the Estates Designation, Estates — Mixed Use District, Neighborhood Center Subdistrict of this Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element, of the Collier County Growth Management Plan. 3 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 6 of 42 Policy 3.1.2: Conditional Uses within Rural Golden Gate Estates shall be subject to locational and dimensional criteria established within the Conditional Use Subdistrict in the Land Use Designation Description section of this Rural Golden Gate Sub-Element. OBJECTIVE 3.2: Provide for new commercial development within Neighborhood Centers and other future Commercial Land Use Designations. Policy 3.2.1: Within one year of the completion of the Randall Blvd. and Oil Well Rd. Corridor study, the County Manager or designee shall initiate an evaluation of the future land uses along Immokalee Rd. in the vicinity of Randall Blvd., Oil Well Rd. and Wilson Blvd. (as generally shown on the Immokalee Rd./Randall Blvd. Planning Study Area Map) and make recommendations to the Board of County Commissioners for any proposed changes to the future land uses. GOAL 4: TO PRESERVE THE AREA'S RURAL CHARACTER, AS DEFINED BY LARGE WOODED LOTS, THE KEEPING OF LIVESTOCK, THE ABILITY TO GROW CROPS, WILDLIFE ACTIVITY, ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP, LOW-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, AND LIMITATIONS ON COMMERCIAL AND CONDITIONAL USES. OBJECTIVE 4.1: Balance the provision of public infrastructure with the need to preserve the rural character of Rural Golden Gate Estates. Policy 4.1.1: Future road and bridge improvements in Rural Golden Gate Estates shall not only provide for safety and reasonable mobility, but shall also contribute to the rural character of the area. Transportation improvements shall be designed in context with their setting. Policy 4.1.2: The County shall initiate architectural standard requirements in the Land Development Code within two years of adoption that apply to commercial, conditional use and essential services facilities, reflecting the rural character of the Estates area and providing coherence and area identity. Policy 4.1.3: The County Manager or designee shall create a public network of greenway corridors within Rural Golden Gate Estates that interconnects public lands and permanently protected green space. The greenway network shall consist of interconnected trails and paths that allow people to move about the Estates area by means other than motorized vehicles. All greenways shall be constructed within or abutting existing or future public easements or rights-of-way. In creating the greenway network, the County shall not employ eminent domain proceedings. OBJECTIVE 4.2: Provide for the protection of the rural character of Rural Golden Gate Estates. 4 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 7 of 42 Policy 4.2.1: .� Rural character protection provisions shall provide for the preservation of such rural amenities as, but not limited to, wooded lots, the keeping of livestock, the ability to grow crops, wildlife activity, and low-density residential development. Policy 4.2.2: The growing of food crops and/or the keeping of livestock on properties within Rural Golden Gate Estates shall be permitted, provided that such activities are conducted according to the Land Development Code. Policy 4.2.3: Rural character shall be further protected by resisting site-specific Master Plan changes that are out of scale or character with the rural quality of Golden Gate Estates. Policy 4.2.4: Recognizing the low density in Rural Golden Gate Estates, the County will initiate a review of written notification requirements in the Land Development Code and the Administrative Code related to land use petitions in Golden Gate Estates, within 1 year of adoption, and consider increasing the specified distance, with particular attention to properties located on dead-end streets. Policy 4.2.5: Consistent with public safety requirements and best practices for rural areas, outdoor lighting within Rural Golden Gate Estates shall be placed, constructed and maintained in such manner as to prevent or reduce light pollution. In implementing this Policy, the County shall: a. Adhere to the"Collier County Lighting Standards"(County Manager's Office Standards dated -� January 6, 2017)as amended, with respect to new and existing County owned or maintained sites and structures. b. Continue to coordinate with FPL and FDOT to improve roadway and security lighting consistent with International Dark Skies Association best practices. c. Consider changes to the Land Development Code and other applicable ordinances to create voluntary or mandatory outdoor lighting standards for commercial, residential or other uses consistent with International Dark Skies Association best practices, and determine the extent such standards apply to new or existing development. OBJECTIVE 4.3: Encourage the preservation of natural resources in Rural Golden Gate Estates, including protection and enhancement of its watershed. Policy 4.3.1: The Land Development Code shall continue to allow and further encourage the preservation of native vegetation and wildlife indigenous to the Rural Golden Gate Estates. Policy 4.3.2: The County shall continue to pursue the Watershed Management Plan initiatives in Rural Golden Gate Estates as financial and staff resources become available. Policy 4.3.3: The County shall encourage the combination of parcels smaller than 2.25 acres with other parcels in order to preserve and enhance low-density environmental advantages. Within two years of 5 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 8 of 42 adoption of this policy, County staff will present recommendations for property owner incentives to the Board of County Commissioners. Policy 4.3.4: The County will evaluate the use of transferable development rights for the purpose of securing the preservation of wetland or other environmentally significant land within Rural Golden Gate Estates, in a timeframe directed by the Board. Policy 4.3.5: Within two years of adoption, the County, in coordination with the Floodplain Management Committee,will initiate a study on the feasibility of dispersed water management(DWM)for single family Estates lots, and determine the extent to which it will rely on voluntary, incentive or mandatory provisions and whether provisions will apply to developed and undeveloped Estates parcels. Policy 4.3.6: The County will continue to identify and implement educational opportunities related to water resources for parcel owners, homeowners, builders, real estate professionals and the public to aid in understanding and addressing site-specific financial and environmental impacts as well as area-wide impacts to water resources. Policy 4.3.7: The County will periodically coordinate with the South Florida Water Management District to review the Level of Service Standards for primary water management canals within the County and their effect on Rural Golden Gate Estates. Policy 4.3.8: The County shall continue to pursue a best management practices approach to making septage treatment available to residents and businesses within Rural Golden Gate Estates, as a component of bio-solid processing, either directly, through a private entity, or through a public- private partnership. GOAL 5: GOLDEN GATE ESTATES TO PROVIDE FOR A SAFE AND EFFICIENT COUNTY AND LOCAL ROADWAY NETWORK, WHILE AT THE SAME TIME SEEKING TO PRESERVE THE RURAL CHARACTER OF RURAL GOLDEN GATE ESTATES IN FUTURE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE GOLDEN GATE AREA. OBJECTIVE 5.1: Increase the number of route alternatives for traffic moving through the Rural Golden Gate Area in both east-west and north-south directions, consistent with neighborhood traffic safety considerations, and consistent with the preservation of the area's rural character. Policy 5.1.1: In planning to increase the number of route alternatives through the Rural Golden Gate Estates, Collier County will prioritize the following routes over other alternatives: a. The extension of Vanderbilt Beach Road from its current terminus to DeSoto Boulevard. b. The development of a north-south connection from the eastern terminus of White Boulevard to Golden Gate Boulevard. 6 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 9 of 42 c. The development of a new east-west roadway crossing the Estates Area south of Golden ..� Gate Boulevard. Policy 5.1.2: The County shall coordinate with FDOT and the Metropolitan Planning Organization to submit a revised interchange justification report for an interchange at 1-75 in the vicinity of Everglades Blvd. (Section 31-34, Township 49, Range 28). Policy 5.1.3: Everglades Blvd., between Golden Gate Blvd and 1-75, shall not be expanded beyond 4 lanes. OBJECTIVE 5.2: Increase linkages within the local road system for the purposes of limiting traffic on arterials and major collectors within Rural Golden Gate Estates, shortening vehicular trips, and increasing overall road system capacity. Policy 5.2.1: The County shall continue to explore alternative financing methods to facilitate both east- west and north-south bridging of canals within Rural Golden Gate Estates. Policy 5.2.2: The County shall update the 2008 Bridge Study to prioritize bridge construction based on emergency response times, evacuation times, cost components, anticipated development patterns and other considerations and shall report its recommendations to the Board of County Commissioners within two years of adoption of this policy. Policy 5.2.3: Planning and right-of-way acquisition for bridges within the Estates Area local road system shall -� include consideration of the costs and benefits of including sidewalks and bike lanes. Policy 5.2.4: Sidewalks and bike lanes shall provide access to government facilities, schools, commercial areas and the planned Metropolitan Planning Organization greenway network. Policy 5.2.5: Planning, funding and implementation of potential greenway trails shall be coordinated between the County and the Metropolitan Planning Organization. OBJECTIVE 5.3: Explore alternative financing methods to accelerate paving of lime rock roads. Policy 5.3.1: The County will consider the acceleration of the paving of lime rock roads, including a cost/benefit analysis, in its annual budget review. GOAL 6: TO PROTECT THE LIVES AND PROPERTY OF THE RESIDENTS OF THE RURAL GOLDEN GATE ESTATES , AS WELL AS THE HEALTH OF THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT, THROUGH THE PROVISION OF EMERGENCY SERVICES THAT PREPARE FOR, MITIGATE, AND RESPOND TO, NATURAL AND MANMADE DISASTERS. 7 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 10 of 42 OBJECTIVE 6.1: Coordinate with local emergency services officials in engineering and constructing road improvements within Rural Golden Gate Estates to ensure that the access needs of fire department, police and emergency management personnel and vehicles are met. Policy 6.1.1: Collier County shall hold at least one annual public meeting with Golden Gate Area emergency services providers and the local civic association in order to ensure that emergency needs are addressed during the acquisition of right-of-way for design and construction of road improvements. Policy 6.1.2: Collier County shall continue to coordinate with Golden Gate Area emergency services providers to prioritize necessary road improvements related to emergency evacuation needs. OBJECTIVE 6.2: Ensure that the needs of all applicable emergency services providers are included and coordinated in the overall public project design for capital improvement projects within the Rural Golden Gate Estates. Policy 6.2.1: Preparation of Collier County's annual Schedule of Capital Improvements for projects within the Rural Golden Gate Estates shall be coordinated with the independent Fire Districts that serve Rural Golden Gate Estates (Fire Districts), public and private utilities, Emergency Medical Services Department and the Collier County Sheriff's Department to ensure that public project designs are consistent with the needs of these agencies. Policy 6.2.2: Fire Districts, Collier County Emergency Medical Services Department and the Collier County Sheriff's Department will receive copies of pre-construction plans for capital improvement projects in the Rural Golden Gate Estates and will be invited to review and comment on plans for the public projects. OBJECTIVE 6.3: Maintain and implement public information programs through the Collier County Bureau of Emergency Services, Collier County Sheriff's Department, Fire Districts, and other appropriate agencies, to inform residents and visitors of the Greater Golden Gate Area regarding the means to prevent, prepare for, and cope with, man-made and natural disasters. Policy 6.3.1: The Fire Districts that serve the Golden Gate area, and other appropriate agencies, shall embark on an education program to assist residents in knowing and understanding the value and need for prescribed burning on public lands in high risk fire areas. Policy 6.3.2: The Fire Districts, and Collier County Bureau of Emergency Services shall actively promote the Firewise Communities Program through public education in Rural Golden Gate Estates. 8 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 11 of 42 Policy 6.3.3: The Fire Districts, and the Collier County Bureau of Emergency Services shall hold one or more annual "open house" presentations in the Golden Gate Area emphasizing issues related to wildfires, flooding, emergency access and general emergency management. OBJECTIVE 6.4: Pursue appropriate planning and mitigation measures to address the threat of wildfires in Rural Golden Gate Estates. Policy 6.4.1: Collier County shall evaluate the Land Development Code for Rural Golden Gate Estates and requirements that are found to be inconsistent with acceptable fire prevention standards. This evaluation process shall be coordinated with the Fire Districts, and the Collier County Bureau of Emergency Services. Policy 6.4.2: Within one year of adoption, the County shall begin to evaluate the need to purchase or dedicate parcels within Rural Golden Gate Estates for the purpose of providing staging areas for wildfire prevention activities for the Florida Forest Service, Fire Districts, Collier County or other agency use and will consider whether potential parcels may be used for other public purposes including ride sharing or park and ride facilities allowed by Conditional Use. Policy 6.4.3: The County shall explore annually, options for funding wildfire prevention measures undertaken by the County, Florida Forest Service and/or Fire Districts, including but not limited to Rural Golden Gate Estates Municipal Services Taxing Units(MSTU)revenue, grant funding and general fund revenue. Policy 6.4.4: The County shall review annually and update as necessary, all interlocal agreements and mutual aid agreements to assure coordination of legal, procedural and educational components of wildfire prevention. Policy 6.4.5: County-owned property within Rural Golden Gate Estates shall be subject to an active, on-going management plan to reduce the damage caused by wildfires originating from County-owned properties. JREMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANKI 9 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 12 of 42 B. LAND USE DESIGNATION DESCRIPTION SECTION The following section describes the three land use designations shown on the Rural Golden Gate Estates Future Land Use Map. These designations generally indicate the types of land uses for which zoning may be requested. However, these land use designations do not guarantee that a zoning request will be approved. Requests may be denied by the Board of County Commissioners based on criteria in the Land Development Code or in special studies completed for the County. 1. ESTATES DESIGNATION This designation is characterized by low density semi-rural residential lots with limited opportunities for other land uses. Typical lots are 2.25 acres in size. However, there are some legal non-conforming lots as small as 1.14 acres. Residential density is limited to a maximum of one unit per 2.25 gross acres, or one unit per legal non-conforming lot of record, exclusive of guesthouses. Multiple family dwelling units, duplexes, and other structures containing two or more principal dwellings, are prohibited in all Districts and Subdistricts in this Designation. Generally, the Estates Designation also accommodates future non-residential uses, including: a. Conditional uses and essential services as defined in the Land Development Code, except as prohibited in the Neighborhood Center Subdistrict. Also, refer to the Conditional Uses Subdistrict. b. Parks, open space and recreational uses. c. Group Housing shall be permitted subject to the definitions and regulations as outlined in the Collier County Land Development Code (Ordinance No. 04-41, as amended) and consistent with locational requirements in Florida Statutes (Chapter 419.001 F.S.). d. Schools and school facilities in the Estates Designation north of 1-75, and where feasible and mutually acceptable, co-locate schools with other public facilities, such as parks, libraries and community centers to the extent possible. Group Housing includes the following type facilities: aa. Family Care Facility if occupied by not more than six (6) persons shall be permitted in residential areas. bb. Group Care Facility, cc. Care Units, dd. Adult Congregate Living Facilities, and ee. Nursing Homes. All of the above uses shall be consistent with all of the Goals, Objectives and Policies of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan. A. Estates —Mixed-Use District 1. Residential Estates Subdistrict Single-family residential development is allowed within this Subdistrict at a maximum density of one unit per 2.25 gross acres, or one unit per legal non-conforming lot of record, exclusive of guesthouses. 2. Neighborhood Center Subdistrict Recognizing the need to provide basic goods, services and amenities to Estates residents, Neighborhood Centers have been designated on the Rural Golden Gate Estates Future Land 10 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 13 of 42 Use Map. The Neighborhood Center designation does not guarantee that commercial zoning will be granted. The designation only provides the opportunity to request commercial zoning. a. The Collier County Land Development Code shall be amended to provide rural design criteria to regulate all new commercial development within Neighborhood Centers. b. Locations Neighborhood Centers are located along major roadways and are distributed within Rural Golden Gate Estates according to commercial demand estimates. (See Rural Golden Gate Estates Neighborhood Centers Map). The centers are designed to concentrate all new commercial zoning, and conditional uses, as allowed in the Estates Zoning District, in locations where traffic impacts can be readily accommodated and to avoid strip and disorganized patterns of commercial and conditional use development. Three Neighborhood Centers are established as follows: i. Wilson Boulevard and Golden Gate Boulevard Center. This center consists of three quadrants at the intersection of Wilson and Golden Gate Boulevards_. The NE and SE quadrants of the Center consist of Tract 1 and 2, Unit 14, Tract 17, Unit 13 and the western half of Tract 18, Unit 13 Golden Gate Estates. The NE quadrant of Wilson and Golden Gate Boulevards is approximately 8.45 acres. The parcels within the NE quadrant shall be interconnected and share access to Golden Gate Boulevard and Wilson Boulevard to minimize connections to these two major roadways. The SE quadrant of Wilson and Golden Gate Boulevards is 7.15 acres, allows 5.00 acres of commercial development, and allocates 2.15 acres to project buffering and right-of-way for Golden Gate Boulevard and Wilson Boulevard. The SW quadrant of the Center is approximately 11.78 acres in size and consists of Tract 124, 125, and the north 150 feet of Tract 126, Unit 12 of Golden Gate Estates. ii. Everglades Boulevard and Golden Gate Boulevard Center. This Center consists of all four quadrants at the intersection of Everglades and Golden Gate Boulevards (See Golden Gate Boulevard/Everglades Boulevard Center Map). The NE quadrant of the Center is approximately 5.46 acres in size and consists of Tract 1, Unit 77 of Golden Gate Estates. The SE quadrant of the Center is approximately 5.46 acres in size and consists of Tract 97, Unit 81 of Golden Gate Estates. The NW quadrant of the Center is approximately 5.46 acres in size and consists of Tract 128, Unit 76 of Golden Gate Estates. The SW quadrant of the Center is approximately 5.46 acres in size and consists of Tract 96, Unit 81 of Golden Gate Estates. iii. The Immokalee Road and Everglades Boulevard Center. This Center is located in the southwest and the southeast quadrants of the intersection. This Center consists of three Tracts: Tract 128, Unit 47, is 5.15 + acres and is located within the southwest quadrant of the Center, south of the fire station; and, Tracts 113 and 16, Unit 46, are 4.05 +acres and 5.15 + acres respectively, and are within the southeast quadrant of the Center, east of the fire station. c. Criteria for land uses at the centers are as follows: 11 --� The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 14 of 42 Commercial uses shall be limited to intermediate commercial so as to provide for a wider variety of goods and services in areas that have a higher degree of automobile traffic. These uses shall be similar to C-1, C-2, or C-3 zoning districts outlined in the Collier County Land Development Code (Ordinance No. 04-41, as amended), except as prohibited below. ii. Parcels immediately adjacent to commercial zoning within the Neighborhood Centers located at the intersections Golden Gate Boulevard and Wilson Boulevard (excluding the SW quadrant), Golden Gate Boulevard and Everglades Boulevard, Everglades Boulevard and Immokalee Road may qualify for Conditional Use under the transitional conditional use provision of the Conditional Uses Subdistrict of this Master Plan Element. iii. A single project shall utilize no more than 50% of the total allowed commercial acreage. This percentage may be increased at the discretion of the Board of County Commissioners. iv. The project shall make provisions for shared parking arrangements with adjoining developments. v. Access points shall be limited to one per 180 feet commencing from the right- of-way of the major intersecting streets of the Neighborhood Center. A maximum of three curb cuts per quadrant shall be allowed. vi. Driveways and curb cuts shall be consolidated with adjoining developments, whenever possible. vii. Driveways accessing parcels on opposite sides of the roadway shall be in direct alignment, except when the roadway median between the two parcels has no opening. viii. Projects shall provide a 25-foot wide landscape buffer abutting the external right-of-way. This buffer shall contain two staggered rows of trees that shall be spaced no more than 30 feet on center, and a double row hedge at least 24 inches in height at time of planting and attaining a minimum of three feet height within one year. A minimum of 50% of the 25-foot wide buffer area shall be comprised of a meandering bed of shrubs and ground covers other than grass. Existing native trees must be retained within this 25-foot wide buffer area to aid in achieving this buffer requirement; other existing native vegetation shall be retained, where possible, to aid in achieving this buffer requirement. Water retention/detention areas shall be allowed in this buffer area if left in natural state, and drainage conveyance through the buffer area shall be allowed if necessary to reach an external outfall. a. All buildings shall have tile roofs, 'Old Style Florida' metal roofs, or decorative parapet walls above the roofline. The buildings shall be finished in light, subdued colors, except for decorative trim. ix. Building heights shall be limited to one (1) story, with a maximum height of thirty- five (35)feet. _ x. All lighting facilities shall be architecturally—designed, and shall be limited to a height of twenty-five (25) feet. Such lighting facilities shall be shielded from neighboring residential land uses and consistent with Policy 5.2.4. 12 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 15 of 42 xi. Commercial uses shall encourage pedestrian traffic through placement of sidewalks, pedestrian walkways, and marked crosswalks within parking areas. Adjacent projects shall coordinate placement of sidewalks so that a continuous pathway through the Neighborhood Center is created. xii. All buildings and projects within any single specific quadrant of the Subdistrict shall utilize a common architectural theme. This theme shall be applicable to both building design and signage. xiii. No building footprint shall exceed 5,000 square feet, unless the project is submitted in the form of a PUD. Walkways or courtyards shall connect adjacent buildings. xiv. Drive-through establishments shall be limited to banks, with no more than 3 lanes; the drive-through areas shall be architecturally integrated with the rest of the building. _ xv. Fences or walls may be constructed on the commercial side of the required landscape buffer between adjacent commercial and residential uses. If constructed, such fences or walls shall not exceed five (5)feet in height. Walls shall be constructed of brick or stone. Fences shall be of wood or concrete post or rail types, and shall be of open design (not covered by slats, boards or wire). xvi. Projects directly abutting residential property(property zoned E-Estates and without an approved conditional use) shall provide, at a minimum, a seventy-five (75) feet wide buffer in which no parking uses are permitted. Twenty-five (25) feet of the width of the buffer along the developed area shall be a landscape buffer. A minimum of fifty (50) feet of the buffer width shall consist of retained native vegetation and must be consistent with subsection 3.05.07H. of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC). The native vegetation retention area may consist of a -� perimeter berm and be used for water management detention. Any newly constructed berm shall be revegetated to meet subsection 3.05.07H. of the LDC (native vegetation replanting requirements). Additionally, in order to be considered for approval, use of the native vegetation retention area for water management purposes shall meet the following criteria: a. There shall be no adverse impacts to the native vegetation being retained. The additional water directed to this area shall not increase the annual hydro-period unless it is proven that such would have no adverse impact to the existing vegetation. b. If the project requires permitting by the South Florida Water Management District, the project shall provide a letter or official document from the District indicating that the native vegetation within the retention area will not have to be removed to comply with water management requirements. If the District cannot or will not supply such a letter, then the native vegetation retention area shall not be used for water management. c. If the project is reviewed by Collier County, the County engineer shall provide evidence that no removal of native vegetation is necessary to facilitate the necessary storage of water in the water management area. xix. Projects within the Neighborhood Center Subdistrict that are submitted as PUDs shall provide a functional public open-space component. Such public open-space shall be developed as green space within a pedestrian-accessible courtyard, as per Section 4.06.03B. of the 13 -� The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 16 of 42 Collier County Land Development Code, as in effect at the time of P.U.D. approval. xx. The following principal permitted uses are prohibited within Neighborhood Centers: a. Drinking Places (5813) and Liquor Stores (5921) b. Mail Order Houses (5961) c. Merchandizing Machine Operators (5962) d. Power Laundries (7211) e. Crematories (7261) (Does not include non-crematory Funeral Parlors) f. Radio, TV Representatives (7313) and Direct Mail Advertising Services (7331) g. NEC Recreational Shooting Ranges, Waterslides, etc. (7999) h. General Hospitals(8062), Psychiatric Hospitals(8063), and Specialty Hospitals (8069) i. Elementary and Secondary Schools (8211), Colleges (8221), Junior Colleges (8222) j. Libraries (8231) k. Correctional Institutions (9223) I. Waste Management(9511) m. Homeless Shelters and Soup Kitchens. xxi. The following additional restrictions and standards apply to Tract 124 and the north 150 feet of Tract 126, within the southwest quadrant of the Wilson Boulevard and Golden Gate Boulevard Center: a. Commercial uses shall be limited to the following: 1. medical offices and clinics and professional offices, except surveyors; and, 2. medical related uses, such as a wellness center. b. The ordinance rezoning this property to allow commercial uses shall include the following requirements: 1. no less than sixty percent (60%) of the gross square footage shall be designated for medical offices and clinics; and, 2. parking for the entire project shall be that required for medical office or clinic use by the Land Development Code (Ordinance No. 04-41, as amended), so as to allow 100 percent medical office use. c. Parking lot lighting shall be restricted to bollards except as may be required to comply with lighting standards in the Land Development Code (Ordinance No. 04-41, as amended) and other governing regulations. d. The Neighborhood Center boundaries of this quadrant shall not be further expanded. 3. Conditional Uses Subdistrict Various types of conditional uses are permitted in the Estates zoning district within the Rural Golden Gate Estates area. In order to control the location and spacing of new conditional uses, one of the following four sets of criteria shall be met: 14 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 17 of 42 a. Essential Services Conditional Use Provisions: Those Essential Services Conditional Uses, as identified within Section 2.01.03 G. of the Collier County Land Development Code, may be allowed anywhere within the Estates Zoning District, except as prohibited in certain Neighborhood Centers, and are described as: 1. electric or gas generating plants, 2. effluent tanks, 3. major re-pump stations, 4. sewage treatment plants, including percolation ponds, 5. hospitals and hospices, 6. water aeration or treatment plants, 7. governmental facilities (except for those Permitted Uses identified in Section 2.01.03 of the Land Development Code), 8. public water supply acquisition, withdrawal, or extraction facilities, and 9. public safety service facilities, and other similar facilities. b. Neighborhood Center Transitional Conditional Use Provisions: Conditional uses shall be allowed immediately adjacent to designated Neighborhood Centers subject to the following criteria: 1. Properties eligible for conditional uses shall abut the arterial or collector road serving the Neighborhood Center, 2. Such uses shall be limited to transitional conditional uses that are compatible with both residential and commercial such as neighborhood churches, social or fraternal organizations, childcare centers, schools, and group care facilities, 3. All conditional uses shall make provisions for shared parking arrangements with adjoining developments whenever possible, 4. Conditional uses abutting Estates zoned property shall provide, at a minimum, a 75-foot buffer of native vegetation in which no parking or water management uses are permitted, 5. Conditional uses adjoining the commercial uses within Neighborhood Centers shall, whenever possible, share parking areas, access and curb cuts with the adjoining commercial use, in order to facilitate traffic movement. c. Transitional Conditional Uses: Conditional uses may be granted in Transitional Areas. A Transitional Area is defined as an area located between existing non-residential and residential areas. The purpose of this provision is to allow conditional uses in areas that are adjacent to existing non-residential uses and are therefore generally not appropriate for residential use. The conditional use will act as a buffer between non-residential and residential areas. The following criteria shall apply for Transitional Conditional Use requests: 1. Site shall be directly adjacent to a non-residential use (zoned or developed); 2. Site shall be 2.25 acres, or more, in size or be at least 150 feet in width and shall not exceed 5 acres; 3. Site abutting Estates zoned property without an approved conditional use shall provide, at a minimum, a 75-foot buffer of native vegetation in which no parking or water management uses are permitted; 4. Site shall not be adjacent to a church, neighborhood church or other place of worship, school, social or fraternal organization, child care center, convalescent 15 --� The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 18 of 42 home, hospice, rest home, home for the aged, adult foster home, children's home, rehabilitation centers; 5. Site shall not be adjacent to parks or open space and recreational uses; and 6. Site shall not be adjacent to permitted (by right) Essential Service uses, as identified in Section 2.01.03 of the Land Development Code, except may be located adjacent to libraries and museums. d. Special Exceptions to Conditional Use Locational Criteria: 1. Temporary use (TU) permits for model homes, as defined in the Collier County Land Development Code, may be allowed anywhere within the Estates-Mixed Use District. Conditional use permits for the purpose of extending the time period for use of the structure as a model home shall be required, and shall be subject to the provisions of Section 5.04.04.B. and C. of the Collier County Land Development Code, Ordinance No. 04-41, as amended. Such conditional uses shall not be subject to the locational criteria of the Conditional Uses Subdistrict, and may be allowed anywhere within the Estates-Mixed Use District. 2. Conditional Use permits for excavation, as provided for in the Estates zoning district, are not subject to the locational criteria for Conditional Uses and may be allowed anywhere within the Estates-Mixed Use District. 3. Conditional Use for a church or place of worship, as provided for in the Estates zoning district, is allowed on Tract 22, Golden Gate Estates, Unit 97 (See Special Exception to Conditional Use Location Criteria Map). 4. Conditional Use for a cellular tower be allowed anywhere in the Estates Zoning District only on parcels no smaller than 2.25 acres and adjacent to a roadway classified within the Transportation Element as a Collector or Arterial. 4. Mission Subdistrict The Mission Subdistrict is located on the south side of Oil Well Road, approximately one- quarter mile west of Everglades Boulevard, and consists of 21.72 acres. The purpose of this Subdistrict is to provide for churches and related uses, including community outreach. The following uses are allowed: a. Churches. b. Child care centers — must be not-for-profit and affiliated with a church within the Subdistrict. c. Private schools — must be not-for-profit and affiliated with a church within the Subdistrict. d. Individual and family social services (activity centers, elderly or handicapped only; day care centers, adult and handicapped only)—must be not-for-profit and affiliated with a church within the Subdistrict. e. Medical outreach to the community, to include activities such as administering influenza vaccine, checking blood pressure, and conducting blood donation drives — must be not-for-profit and affiliated with a church within the Subdistrict. Soup kitchens and homeless shelters are prohibited in this Subdistrict. The maximum total floor area allowed in this Subdistrict is 90,000 square feet. The maximum height of buildings shall be 30 feet zoned height, except the worship center shall be permitted a zoned height of 35 feet. Development in this Subdistrict shall be designed to be compatible with the existing, and allowed future, development in the surrounding area. 16 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 19 of 42 In the alternate to the foregoing uses, measures of development intensity, and development standards, this Subdistrict may be developed with single family dwellings in accordance with the Residential Estates Subdistrict. Property adjacent to this Subdistrict shall not qualify for the Transitional Conditional Use. 5. Everglades— Randall Subdistrict The Everglades — Randall Subdistrict is located on the northeast corner of Everglades Boulevard and Randall Boulevard, consists of 7.8 acres, and comprises Tract 115 and the east 150 feet of Tract 116, Unit 69, Golden Gate Estates. The purpose of this Subdistrict is to provide for churches and other places of worship and their related uses. The following use is permitted within the Subdistrict through the conditional use process: a. Churches and other places of worship The following church-related uses are prohibited within the Subdistrict: a. Day care centers b. Private schools c. Soup kitchens d. Homeless shelters The maximum total floor area allowed in this Subdistrict is 20,000 square feet, including no more than 230 seats. The maximum height of buildings shall be 30 feet. Architectural features such as steeples may be a maximum height of 60 feet. For access drives, a throat depth of no less than 30 feet, measured from the roadway edge of the pavement, shall be provided. B. Estates —Commercial District 1. Randall Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict The Randall Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict, containing approximately 56.5 acres, is located on the south side of Randall Boulevard and Immokalee Road (CR-846), extending from 8th Street NE west to the Corkscrew Canal. This Subdistrict is comprised of the following properties: Tracts 54, 55, 71, 72, 89, 90, 107, 108, 125, 126 and 127, Golden Gate Estates, Unit 23. This Subdistrict has been designated on the Rural Golden Gate Estates Future Land Use Map and the Randall Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict Map. It is the intent of this Subdistrict to provide commercial goods and services to the surrounding area. All development in the Subdistrict shall comply with the following requirements and limitations: a. All development is encouraged to be in the form of a PUD. b. Projects directly abutting Estates zoned property shall provide, at a minimum, a 75- foot wide buffer of retained native vegetation in which no parking or water management uses are permitted; except that, when abutting conditional uses no such buffer is required. c. Shared parking shall be required with adjoining development whenever possible. d. Tract 55 shall only be utilized for native preservation and water management areas. e. The eastern boundary of Tract 55 shall contain, at a minimum, a 50-foot wide retained native vegetation buffer. f. The following limitation shall apply to Tract 71 only: 1. Limitation of Uses— Uses shall be limited to the following: a. Automobile Service Station; b. Barber& Beauty Shops; c. Convenience Stores; 17 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 20 of 42 d. Drug Stores; e. Food Markets; f. Hardware Stores; g. Laundries—Self Service Only; h. Parks, Public or Private; i. Post Offices and Professional Offices; j. Repair Shops— Radio, TV, Small Appliances and Shoes; k. Restaurants, including fast food restaurants but not drive in restaurants; I. All Permitted Uses of the C-2, Convenience Commercial, zoning district in the Collier County Land Development Code, Ordinance No. 04-41, as amended as of April 14, 2009; and, m. Veterinary Clinic with no outside kenneling; g. The following limitations shall apply to Tracts 72, 89, 90, 107, 108, 125, 126, 127, and Tract 54: 1. Development intensity on Tracts 72, 89, 90, 107, 108, 125, 126, 127 and the west one-half of Tract 54 shall be limited to 360,950 square feet of floor area, of which no more than 285,950 square feet shall be retail development. 2. Development intensity on the east one-half of Tract 54 shall be limited to 20,000 square feet of commercial development. 3. The first phase of the project development, exclusive of the existing 20,000 sq. ft. of development on the east one-half of Tract 54, shall include a grocery anchor, with a minimum of 35,000 square feet of gross leasable floor area, prior to any certificates of occupancy being issued beyond 100,000 square feet of commercial development. 4. Allowable uses shall be limited to the permitted and conditional uses of the C-4, General Commercial District in the Collier County Land Development Code in effect as of the effective date of the adoption of the amendment of this Subdistrict [Ordinance No. 2010 -32, adopted July 28, 2010], except that the following uses, as identified with a number from the Standard Industrial Classification Manual, shall be prohibited: a. Tire Dealers,Automotive Retail (Group 5531) b. Automotive Parking (Group 7521) c. Communication Services (Group 4899) d. Drinking Places (Group 5813) e. Fishing Piers (Group 7999) f. Glass and Glazing work (Group 1793) g. Health Services (Groups 8059 - 8069) h. Specialty Outpatient Facilities (Group 8093) i. Houseboat Rental, Lakes Operations, Party and Pleasure Boat rental (Group 7999) j. Large Appliance repair service (Group 7623) k. Marinas (Group 4493 and 4499) I. Miscellaneous Repair Services (Groups 7622-7641, 7699) m. Liquor Store, unless operated by a Grocery Retailer(Group 5921) n. Used Merchandise Store (Group 5932) 18 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 21 of 42 o. Automatic Merchandising Machine Operators (Group 5962) -� p. Direct Selling Establishment (Group 5963) q. Escort Services, Massage Parlors, Tattoo Parlors, Turkish Baths, Wedding Chapels (Group 7299) r. Betting Information Services, Bath Houses, Billiard Parlors, Bookies and Bookmakers, Cable lifts, Carnival Operation, Circus Companies, Fortune Tellers, Go-cart racing operation, Off-track betting, Ping Pong Parlors, Rodeo Animal Rentals, Rodeos, Shooting Ranges, Trapshooting Facilities (Group 7999) s. Parole offices, Probation offices, Public welfare centers, refugee services, settlement houses (Group 8322) t. Tow-in parking lots (Groups 7514, 7515, 7521) u. Animal Specialty Services (Group 0752) 5. At time of rezoning, consideration shall be given to imposing appropriate restrictions on the amount of development allowed in this Subdistrict prior to discontinuance and relocation of the Big Corkscrew Island Fire Station and Florida Division of Forestry fire tower uses. 6. All buildings on Tracts 72, 89, 90, 107, 108, 125, 126 and 127 shall be developed with a unified architectural theme. 7. Excluding the commercial zoning on Tract 71 and the existing approved commercial zoning on the east one-half of Tract 54, any additional development in the Subdistrict shall be developed in phases. Phase I shall be limited to 100,000 square feet of gross leasable floor area. Subsequent phases shall not receive ^. building permits until the Randall Boulevard/Immokalee Road intersection project, including the widening of the segment of Randall Boulevard abutting the Subdistrict, as shown on Exhibit "A" of the Developer Contribution Agreement adopted July 28, 2010 by the Board of County Commissioners, has commenced. No Certificates of Occupancy shall be issued for subsequent development phases until the Randall Boulevard/Immokalee Road intersection project is substantially complete. Neither the building permits limitations nor the Certificates of Occupancy limitations shall apply if satisfactory alternative mitigation is approved by the Board of County Commissioners pursuant to Transportation Element Policy 5.1, or if traffic conditions change in such a manner that adequate capacity is available. 2. Estates Shopping Center Subdistrict Recognizing the need to provide for centrally located basic goods and services within a portion Northern Golden Gate Estates, the Estates Shopping Center Subdistrict has been designated on the Rural Golden Gate Estates Future Land Use Map. The Subdistrict is located at the NW corner of Golden Gate Boulevard and Wilson Boulevard westward to 3rd Street NW and extending northward to include the southern 180 feet of Tracts 142 and 106 of Unit 11 and the southern 255 feet of Tract 111 of Unit 11 of Golden Gate Estates, totaling approximately 41 acres. The Estates Shopping Center Subdistrict is intended to provide convenient shopping, personal services and employment for the central areas of Northern Golden Gate Estates. 19 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 22 of 42 Commercial development in this Subdistrict will reduce driving distances for many residents, assist in minimizing the road network required, and reduce traffic impacts in this area of Collier County. All development in this Subdistrict shall comply with the following requirements and limitations: a. Allowable Uses, as identified with a number from the Standard Industrial Classification Manual, shall be limited to the following: 1. Amusement and recreation Groups 7911 — Dance studios, schools and halls, excluding discotheques 7991 — Physical fitness facilities 7999 — Amusement and recreation services, not elsewhere classified, allowing only day camps, gymnastics instruction, judo/karate instruction, sporting goods rental and yoga instruction 2. Apparel and accessory stores (no adult oriented sales) Groups 5611 — Men's and boys' clothing and accessory stores 5621 —Women's clothing stores 5632—Women's accessory and specialty stores 5641 — Children's and infants' wear stores 5651 — Family clothing stores 5661 — Shoe stores 5699 — Miscellaneous apparel and accessory stores 3. Automotive dealers and gasoline service stations Groups 5531 —Auto and home supply stores 4. Automotive repair, services and parking (No outdoor repair/service. All repairs/services to be performed by authorized automotive technician.) Groups 7514— Passenger car rental 5. Building materials, hardware, garden supply, and mobile home dealers Groups 5231 — Paint, glass, and wallpaper stores 5251 — Hardware stores 5261 — Retail nurseries, lawn and garden supply stores 6. Business services Groups 7334 — Photocopying and duplicating services 7335—Commercial photography 7336— Commercial art and graphic design 7338— Secretarial and court reporting services 7342 — Disinfecting and pest control services 7352 — Medical equipment rental and leasing 7359 —Equipment rental and leasing, not elsewhere classified, excluding the following uses: airplane rental and leasing; coin operated machine rental and leasing; industrial truck rental and leasing; oil field equipment rental and leasing; oil well drilling equipment rental; leasing; toilets, portable— rental and leasing; and vending machines—rental only 7371 — Computer programming services 20 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 23 of 42 7372 — Prepackaged software ,� 7373 — Computer integrated systems design 7374 —Computer processing and data preparation and processing services 7375— Information retrieval services 7376— Computer facilities management services 7379— Computer related services, not elsewhere classified 7382 — Security systems services 7383— News syndicates 7384— Photofinishing laboratories 7389— Business services, not elsewhere classified 7. Communications Groups 4812 — Radiotelephone communications 4841 — Cable and other pay television services 8. Construction, special trade contractors (office use only, no on-site materials or equipment storage) Groups 1711 — Plumbing, heating and air-conditioning 1721 — Painting and paper hanging industry 1731 — Electrical work industry 1741 — Masonry, stone setting, and other stone work 1742— Plastering, drywall, acoustical, and insulation work 1743—Terrazzo, tile, marble, and mosaic work industry 1751 — Carpentry work ..� 1752 — Floor laying and other floor work, not elsewhere classified industry 1761 — Roofing, siding, and sheet metal work industry 1771 — Concrete work industry 1781 —Water well drilling industry 1791 —Structural steel erection 1793—Glass and glazing work 1794— Excavation work 1795—Wrecking and demolition work 1796— Installation or erection of building equipment, not elsewhere 1799— Special trade contractors, not elsewhere classified 9. Depository institutions Groups 6021 — National commercial banks 6022 — State commercial banks 6029 —Commercial banks, not elsewhere classified 6035— Savings institutions, federally chartered 6036 — Savings Institutions, not federally chartered 6061 — Credit unions, federally chartered 6062 — Credit unions, not federally chartered 6091 — Non-deposit trust facilities 21 -� The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 24 of 42 6099—Functions related to depository banking, not elsewhere classified 10. Eating and drinking places (Group 5812, including only liquor service accessory to the restaurant use, no outdoor music or televisions, and no windows or walls open to the outside, except as required by code) 11. Engineering, accounting, research, management, and related services Groups 8711 — Engineering services 8712 —Architectural services 8713 — Surveying services 8721 —Accounting, auditing, and bookkeeping services 8741 — Management services 8742 — Management consulting services 8743 — Public relations services 8748 — Business consulting services, not elsewhere classified 12. Executive, legislative, and general government, except finance Groups 9111 — Executive offices 9121 — Legislative bodies 9131 — Executive and legislative offices combined 9199— General government, not elsewhere classified 13. Food stores Groups 5411 —Grocery stores (minimum 27,000 square feet) 5421 —Meat and fish (seafood) markets, including freezer provisioners 5431 — Fruit and vegetable markets 5441 — Candy, nut, and confectionery stores 5451 — Dairy products stores 5461 — Retail bakeries 5499—Miscellaneous food stores, including convenience stores with fuel pumps and carwash 14. General merchandise stores Groups 5311 — Department stores 5331 —Variety stores 5399 — Miscellaneous general merchandise stores 15. Home furniture, furnishings, and equipment stores Groups 5712 — Furniture stores 5713 — Floor covering stores 5714 — Drapery, curtain, and upholstery stores 5719 — Miscellaneous home furnishings stores 5722 — Household appliance stores 5731 — Radio, television, and consumer electronics stores 5734 — Computer and computer software stores 5735— Record and prerecorded tape stores (no adult oriented sales) 5736 — Musical instrument store 22 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 25 of 42 16. Insurance carriers Groups 6311 — Life insurance 6321 —Accident and health insurance 6324— Hospital and medical service plans 6331 — Fire, marine, and casualty insurance 6351 —Surety insurance 6361 —Title insurance 6371 — Pension, health and welfare funds 6399 — Insurance carriers, not elsewhere classified 6411 — Insurance agents 17. Justice, public order and safety Groups 9221 — Police protection 9222 — Legal counsel and prosecution 9229— Public order and safety, not elsewhere classified 18. Meeting and banquet rooms 19. Miscellaneous retail (no adult oriented sales) Groups 5912 — Drug stores and proprietary stores 5921 — Liquor stores (accessory to grocery or pharmacy only) 5932 — Used merchandise stores 5941 —Sporting goods stores and bicycle shops 5942 — Book stores 5943—Stationery stores 5944—Jewelry stores, including repair 5945— Hobby, toy, and game shops 5946— Camera and photographic supply stores 5947—Gift, novelty, and souvenir shops 5948— Luggage and leather goods stores 5949—Sewing, needlework, and piece goods stores 5992 — Florists 5993—Tobacco stores and stands 5994— News dealers and newsstands 5995—Optical goods stores 5999—Miscellaneous retail stores, not elsewhere classified (excluding gravestone, tombstones, auction rooms, monuments, swimming pools, and sales barns) 20. Non-depository credit institutions Groups 6111 — Federal and federally-sponsored credit agencies 6141 — Personal credit institutions 6153 —Short-term business credit institutions, except agricultural 6159 — Miscellaneous business credit institutions 6162 — Mortgage bankers and loan correspondents 6163— Loan brokers 21. Offices and clinics of dentist (Group 8021) 23 -� The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 26 of 42 22. Personal services Groups 7212— Garment pressing, and agents for laundries and drycleaners 7221 — Photographic studios, portrait 7231 — Beauty shops 7241 — Barber shops 7251 —Shoe repair shops and shoeshine parlors 7291 —Tax return preparation services 7299—Miscellaneous personal services, not elsewhere classified, excluding massage parlors, Turkish baths and escort services 23. Public finance, taxation, and monetary policy (Group 9311) 24. Real Estate Groups 6512 —Operators of nonresidential buildings 6513—Operators of apartment buildings 6514—Operators of dwellings other than apartment buildings 6515—Operators of residential mobile home sites 6517— Lessors of railroad property 6519— Lessors of real property, not elsewhere classified 6531 — Real estate agents and managers 6541 —Title abstract offices 6552 — Land subdividers and developers, except cemeteries 25. Schools and educational services, not elsewhere classified (Group 8299) 26. Security and commodity brokers, dealers, exchanges, and services Groups 6211 — Security brokers, dealers, and flotation companies 6221 — Commodity contracts brokers and dealers 6231 — Security and commodity exchanges 6282 — Investment advice 6289—Services allied with the exchange of securities or commodities, not elsewhere classified 27. Social services Groups 8322 — Individual and family social services (adult day care centers only) 8351 — Child day care services 28. Travel agencies (Group 4724) 29. Veterinary services for animal specialties (Group 0742, excluding outside kenneling) 30. Video tape rental (Group 7841, excluding adult oriented sales and rentals) 31. United states postal service (Group 4311, excluding major distribution centers) 32. Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals ("BZA") by the process outlined in the LDC. b. Accessory Uses: 24 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 27 of 42 Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal -� uses and structures, including, but not limited to: 1. Utility buildings (including water and wastewater plants) which shall be enclosed 2. Essential service facilities 3. Gazebos, statuary and other architectural features 4. Utilities, water and wastewater facilities and/or plants (all processing plants must be enclosed) 5. Alcohol service for outdoor dining shall only be accessory to food service c. Operational Standards 1. Outdoor music is prohibited d. The following uses, as identified with a number from the Standard Industrial Classification Manual, shall be prohibited: 1. Amusement and recreation services, not elsewhere classified (Group 7999, except those uses expressly listed above in a.1 are permitted) 2. Air and water resource and solid waste management (Group 9511) 3. Business Services Groups 7313 - Radio, television, and publishers' advertising representatives 7331 - Direct mail advertising services 4. Correctional Institutions (Group 9223) 5. Drinking places (alcoholic beverages) (Group 5813) 6. Educational services Groups 8211 - Elementary and secondary schools 8221 - Colleges, universities, and professional schools 8222-Junior colleges and technical institutes 8231 - Libraries 7. Health services Groups 8062 -General medical and surgical hospitals 8063 - Psychiatric hospitals 8069 - Specialty hospitals, except psychiatric 8. Miscellaneous Retail Groups 5921 - Liquor stores 5961 - Catalog and mail-order houses 5962 -Automatic merchandising machine operators 9. Personal services Groups 7211 - Power Laundries, family and commercial 7261 - Funeral service and crematories 10. Social services Groups 8322 - Individual and family social services, excluding adult day care centers 8361 -Residential care, including soup kitchens and homeless shelters e. Development intensity shall be limited to 190,000 square feet of gross leasable floor area. 25 .� The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 28 of 42 f. No commercial use shall exceed fifteen thousand (15,000) square feet, except for a single grocery store use between twenty-seven thousand (27,000)and sixty thousand (60,000) square feet in size, a single commercial use of up to thirty thousand (30,000) square feet in size, and a single commercial use of up to twenty thousand (20,000) square feet in size. g. No building may exceed 30,000 square feet in size, except for the grocery anchored building with inline stores. h. Development within this Subdistrict shall be phased and the following commitments related to area roadway improvements shall be completed within the specified timeframes: 1. Right-of-Way for Golden Gate Boulevard Expansion and Right-of-Way for the Wilson Boulevard Expansion will be donated to the County at no cost within 120 days of a written request from the County. 2. The owner will pay its fair share for the intersection improvements at Wilson Boulevard and Golden Gate Boulevard within 90 days of County request for reimbursement. 3. Until the intersection improvements at Golden Gate Boulevard and Wilson Boulevard are complete, the County shall not issue a Certificate(s) of Occupancy (CO) for more than 100,000 square feet of development. The applicant must obtain a C.O. for a grocery store as part of this 100,000 square feet, and the grocery store must be the first C.O. obtained. i. Rezoning is encouraged to be in the form of a Planned Unit Development (PUD), and the rezone ordinance must contain development standards to ensure that all commercial land uses will be compatible with neighboring residential uses. This subdistrict includes a conceptual plan, which identifies the location of the permitted development area and required preserve area for this subdistrict. The preserve area depicted on the conceptual plan shall satisfy all comprehensive plan requirements for retained native vegetation, including but not limited to the requirements of Policy 6.1.1 of the CCME. A more detailed development plan must be developed and utilized for the required PUD rezoning. j. Development standards, including permitted uses and setbacks for principal buildings shall be established at the time of PUD rezoning. Any future PUD rezone shall include at a minimum: 1. Landscape buffers adjacent to external rights-of-way shall be: a. 1St/3rd Streets— Minimum 30'wide enhanced buffer b. Wilson Boulevard — Minimum 25'wide enhanced buffer c. Golden Gate Boulevard — Minimum 50'wide enhanced buffer 2. Except for the utility building, no commercial building may be constructed within 125 feet of the northern property boundary and within 300' of the 3rd Street NW boundary of this subdistrict. 3. Any portion of the Project directly abutting residential property (property zoned E-Estates and without an approved conditional use) shall provide, at a minimum, a seventy-five (75)feet wide buffer, except the westernmost 330' of Tract 106, 26 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 29 of 42 which shall provide a minimum 20'wide buffer in which no parking uses are .� permitted. Twenty-five (25)feet of the width of the buffer along the developed area shall be a landscape buffer. A minimum of fifty (50)feet of the buffer width shall consist of retained or re-planted native vegetation and must be consistent with subsection 3.05.07.H of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC). The native vegetation retention area may consist of a perimeter berm and be used for water management detention. Any newly constructed berm shall be revegetated to meet subsection 3.05.07.H of the LDC (native vegetation replanting requirements). Additionally, in order to be considered for approval, use of the native vegetation retention area for water management purposes shall meet the following criteria: a. There shall be no adverse impacts to the native vegetation being retained. The additional water directed to this area shall not increase the annual hydro- period unless it is proven that such would have no adverse impact to the existing vegetation. b. If the project requires permitting by the South Florida Water Management District, the project shall provide a letter or official document from the District indicating that the native vegetation within the retention area will not have to be removed to comply with water management requirements. If the District cannot or will not supply such a letter, then the native vegetation retention area shall not be used for water management. c. If the project is reviewed by Collier County, the developer's engineer shall provide evidence that no removal of native vegetation is necessary to facilitate the necessary storage of water in the water management area. 2. AGRICULTURAL/RURAL DESIGNATION A. Rural Settlement Area District This area consists of Sections 13, 14, 23 and 24, and a portion of 22, Township 48 South, Range 27 East (the former North Golden Gate Subdivision), which was zoned and platted between 1967 and 1970. In settlement of a lawsuit pertaining to the permitted uses of this property, this property has been "vested"for the types of land uses specified in that certain "PUD" by Settlement Zoning granted by the County as referenced in that certain SETTLEMENT AND ZONING AGREEMENT dated the 27th day of January 1986. Twenty-one hundred (2,100) dwelling units and twenty-two (22) acres of neighborhood commercial uses and hotel/motel use are "vested". This area is now comprised of the Orange Tree PUD and Orange Blossom Ranch PUD, and the types of uses permitted in this District include residential, earth mining, commercial, agricultural, community facility, community uses, education facilities, religious facilities, golf course, open space and recreational uses, and essential service uses. By designation in the Growth Management Plan and the Golden Gate Area Master Plan as Settlement Area, the Plan recognizes the property as an area which, while outside of the Urban Designation, is appropriate for the following types of uses: residential, earth mining, commercial, agricultural, community facility, community uses, education facilities, religious facilities, golf course, open space and recreational, and essential services. Future zoning changes to add dwelling units or commercial acreage within the geographic boundaries of this District will not be prohibited or discouraged by reason of the above-referenced vested status. The geographic expansion of the Settlement Area to additional lands outside the areas covered by Sections 13, 14, 23 and 24, and a portion of 22, Township 48 South, Range 27 East (the former North Golden Gate Subdivision), shall be prohibited. The Settlement Area Land 27 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 30 of 42 Use District is limited to the area described above and shall not be available as a land use district for any other property in the County. 3. OVERLAYS AND SPECIAL FEATURES A. Southern Golden Gate Estates Natural Resource Protection Overlay Southern Golden Gate Estates is identified as a Natural Resource Protection Area (NRPA) Overlay on the Rural Golden Gate Estates Future Land Use Map and is subject to the NRPA Overlay provisions of the FLUE. C. List of Maps Rural Golden Gate Estates Future Land Use Map Rural Golden Gate Estates Neighborhood Centers Wilson Boulevard/Golden Gate Boulevard Center Golden Gate Boulevard/Everglades Boulevard Center Immokalee Road/Everglades Boulevard Center Randall Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict Mission Subdistrict Estates Shopping Center Subdistrict Estates Shopping Center Subdistrict Conceptual Plan Everglades— Randall Subdistrict Immokalee Road/Randall Boulevard Planning Study Area 28 The summary of CCPC adoption changes are highlighted herein. GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 31 of 42 ESTATES DESIGNATION AGRICULTURALIRURAI DESIGNATION SII NIXED USE DISTRICT Ej se.sm..ties Dem O Pevaesei EWm Sutawa Conditional Dae.SubOisbwf OVERLAYS AND SPECIAL FEATURES RURAL GOLDEN GATE ESTATES 1=1..g....--- ®ae GoCastries IIIIII no.c.,ma FUTURE LAND USE MAP E.E..gRa...N.aeasu.aa1G COMMERCIAL DISTRICT -Renesl Sawa Coro so... CO I.— ®uuue.m.oce,wsGmo IMMOKALEE RD 1:1 ASTERawx TSG SE."O.,TTRE GOA<S.OOJECT„ES.ROOMS mouxowE DE.IOSATOGCESCR.1mR SEM.Cf ME GOLDEN • \ z 0 m ICA W 5 CC IW > OIL WELL RD 7 U) o CO irdini OD RANDALL BLVD H IMMOKALEE RD 1 z 9 i '- I , p p VANDERBILTVANDERBILT — BEACH RD BEACH RD z w m UO GOLDEN GATE BLVD r'' GOLDEN GATE BLVD ' L1 U PINE RIDGE RD 1 m .....,,, te / GREEN BLVD o CC z — m J CO W F mU p o 5 J I I m LTI Ip C.G.PKWY __Z RADI p INTERSTATE 75 � INTERSTATE 75 j j j j DAVIS BLVD / .R.84 CL 1:1y w L F .0 U RATTLESNAKE HP MMOCK RD co I- F 9' -q RURAL EN GATE FUTURE LAND USE MAP ,.i/ ADOPTED-%X%X,2019 „�/ r/ O li H / / ` 0 0.5 1 2 3 Miles A /j ..ERwA. GATE ESTATES ew.A.ono I R26E I R27E I R28E R29E RURAL GOLDEN GATE ESTATES NEIGHBORHOOD CENTERS Collier County, Florida i"' / IMMOKALEE RD / I� I Z I 0 J co U) w OIL WELL RD Q J C7 cC w ly > IMMOKALEE RD in z 0 J Z co a 0 > I— co 0 z U) O w VANDFLTRBIBEACH RD FYT Cl) a J JJ_ GOLDEN GATE BLVD W CGf0 W. U) a a > aCO CO > I m CO LL1 > J w Q COCC a F- 0 OCC w CJ w 0 w INTERSTATE-75 7 N AMENDED-SEPTEMBER 10,2003 (Ord.No.2003-44) AMENDED-OCTOBER 26,2004 RURAL HBORHOOD CENTERS s (Ord.No.2004-71) LEGEND AMENDED-JANUARY 25,2007 0 0.5 1 2 3 (Ord.No.2007-19) ®AUR AL GOLDEN GATE ESTATES Miles AMENDED-OCTOBER 14,2008 NEIGHBORHOOD CENTERS PREPARED BY:BETH YANG,ACP pM (Ord.No.2008-59) GM ;`e n I�.tARTMENT O8/15/2C 1 y ENDED 2011 SEPTEMBER 2011 Page 33 of 42 t hborhootl Centers.mxd g DATE:07/2019 WILSON BOULEVARD/GOLDEN GATE BOULEVARD CENTER Collier County, Florida K / / / ///// / / /� /// IMMOKALEE ••-•D / • "• •►► - ' ' ► O 0 .a • •, d c I I A 1 i• ADOPTED — SEPTEMBER 10, 2003 (Ord. No. 2003-44) AMENDED — JANUARY 25, 2007 LEGEND (Ord. No. 2007-19) AMENDED — DECEMBER 4, 2007 (Ord. No. 2007-76) GOLDEN GATE \ SETTLEMENT ESTATES AREA AMENDED OCTOBER 14, 2008 (Ord. No. 2008-59) AMENDED — SEPTEMBER 14, 2011 (Ord. No. 2011-29) _ F--7--T NEIGHBORHOOD 0 1/2 ML 1 MI. CENTER PREPARED BY: GIS/CAD MAPPING SECTION COMMUNIVAIRAEROIVEIWKWEAVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION 08'5/2019 Pap 34 of 42 FILE: GGPI1 9(192008-5.DWG DATE: 9/2011 GOLDEN GATE BOULEVARD/EVERGLADES BOULEVARD CENTER Collier County, Florida / / / /j \\A7 c IMMOKALEE '•- D ' :Sk .. ' ' II A/ 0 o - y rA :• V' ' ► ADOPTED — SEPTEMBER 10, 2003 LEGEND (Ord. No. 2003-44) AMENDED — JANUARY 25, 2007 (Ord. No. 2007-19) GOLDEN GATE AMENDED — OCTOBER 14, 2008 ESTATES \ AREA (Ord. No. 2008-59) \\ NEIGHBORHOOD { 0 1/2 MI. 1 MI. CENTER PREPARED BY: GRAPHICS AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT SECTION COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION FILE: GGMP-45-2008-1.DWG DATE: 10/2008 GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 35 of 42 IMMOKALEE ROAD/EVERGLADES BOULEVARD CENTER Collier County, Florida IMMOKALEE ROAD j „dip r• • IMMOKALEE :• • 0 . ' 0 AMENDED — SEPTEMBER 10, 2003 (Ord. No. 2003-44) LEGEND AMENDED — OCTOBER 26, 2004 (Ord. No. 2004-71) AMENDED — JANUARY 25, 2007 (Ord. No. 2007-19) AMENDED — OCTOBER 14, 2008 GOLDEN GATE SETTLEMENT (Ord. No. 2008-59) / ESTATES AREA NEIGHBORHOOD 0 1/2 MI. 1 MI. CENTER PREPARED BY: GRAPHICS AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT SECTION COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION FILE: GGMP-44-2008-1.DWG DATE: 10/2008 GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 36 of 42 RANDALL BOULEVARD COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT Collier County, Florida i r / / / / l j / / tI► E. • • / IMMOKALEE 0 ► A%► 0 :` 6 ` • ► / :. • • • C7 W Nklimoe tt ► ' t :• A; ► A A LEGEND AMENDED — SEPTEMBER 10, 2003 (Ord. No. 2003-44) AMENDED — JANUARY 25, 2007 (Ord. No. 2007-19) j AMENDED JULY 28, 2010 (Ord. No. 2010-32) GOLDEN GATE SETTLEMENT ESTATES AREA I I I `- 0 1/2 MI. 1 MI. PREPARED BY: GIS/CAD MAPPING SEC110N GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION / PLANNING & REGULATION FILE: CeicRi1aP$QAW80000M: 7/2010 08/15/2019 Page 3/of 42 \)k 6®j Kee �® ro )// WILSON e u±v� 2/2 e J 0 -q \ i. 0 z NMO KASERO ROAD C.R.846 iv 2c.,4 Q 2 U C CO 0 OJ 0-1 4" -I O G G § 3 02 2 ( \ \ r 0 / k I ` 0 ° \ § © c a § - \m / \ o 3 . « ~ E / § ® y EVERGLADES BOULEVARD 2§ zI N) P o « m §§ \/ &) 0 S t g e Ai k m \ (CU / r , ESTATES SHOPPING CENTER SUBDISTRICT Collier County, Florida i` il % .: 6 :6 • / /// / IMMOKALEE ••.•D / • ' "► :•►g • ' • ► O O a 4. — r %` t', P 'A , :1 I 'V I• ► / / / / ADOPTED — SEPTEMBER 14, 2011 (Ord. No. 2011-29) LEGEND //7/7,/ • GOLDEN GATE SETTLEMENT ESTATES AREA i i I CENTERS SHOPPING 0 1/2 MI. 1 MI. CENTER SUBDISTRICT PREPARED BY: GIS/CAD MAPPING SECTION COMMUNOMEAPEEbMiten06Z 6CIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION 08"5/2019 Pape 39 of 42 FILE: GGMP-43-2008-6.DWG DATE: 9/2009 O n O 1-1UMm U) oIr THIRD STREET NW g LI mr ,.. t ''.- 1' ij o m Do N "ooommm _. CO IQ m—I Im Oma! (0I [D • -v O A o N -13 ma - :saw ` m T �s 1 yC V °m 0 C9). sx3 O ^^ N m m "4< m D r 7] 00070 0 cn I D E (� m C to CO c W C m XI Avion.....— J 1.S - ,„ --I O Z i m C) � � � I m . ± � m N G i o \ _ D o_ � I ' 1* D 1 ' m C � N II .. \pat Z 1:1--ir � � 7. D 0 64 21 Z 2 o itWILSON BOULEVARD Oil J m i 0 .. 2 O.-o -+om m*v NG O � 9. 030,D{ 0 m c-, 1I n n m N13 N WILSON BOULEVARD DOD c* N N O J I IMMOKALEE ROAD C.R.846 N m c,, m m 0 n N F O r- N (J1 m C,4 N r 0 I- 1-0 z 0 0O 73 (n ti O o 1D C z �.- o o om C1 z o co cc m m -< D 0 m (GI ccn r 0 < _, - m71 cn o o COCO O co XI CI 0 > -I _.ii_________J73 > \\ r H o EVERGLADES BOULEVARD -om 0 0 A 0 N O Z (ID N co O O J N om 4w I n A N O_ N N CO m O .` r It am Q - m L., o v,� Z {,mr d N c'°D (-5m N x I c)A Z 0 rI- I- r IMMOKALEE ROAD/RANDALL BLVD PLANNING STUDY AREA Ocean Bluff CT r NW LEGEND —` 2.4....i1.1. .n-IMMOKALEE RD/RANDALL BLVD PLANNING STUDY AREA RESIDENTIAL ESTATES SUBDISTRICT N IIII RANDALL BLVD COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT A I j RURAL SETTLEMENT AREA SUBDISTRICT .n.0 0 500 ,000 2,000 3,000 i Feet i i OIL WELL RD PREPARED BY BETH YANG,AICP 1 I � GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT J.fl FILE:Imm Randal Study Area mxd I = DATE:072019 I ■ ■ r■ O a cK i ee w iw i Q i NP Y i > W w i mZZ to noun; i ZZ H F- i i U) I— p U) = i 10 -0 JN 4 ■ N § i i Ii 25th AVE NES, d,.,' I IMMOKALa' AD oouj i RANDALL BLVD I. I n■u■n i El 0 LiJ m 24th AVE NE i- - - - - - - - -z 0 co -JJ_ ADOPTED-XXXXX,2019 (Ord.No.XXXX-XX) -- - ---. '1(141- n L- n tr ni GMPA-PL20180000261 08/15/2019 Page 42 0 42