Agenda 02/12/2008 Item #16D24
Agenda Item No. 16024
February 12, 2008
Page 1 of 26
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Authorization to proceed with Alternative Analysis Numerical Modeling at
Wiggins Pass and approve a $150,000 Budget Amendment within Beach
RenourishmentlPass Maintenance Fund (195) providing sufficient budget to
initiate the required FDEP Alternative Analysis Numerical Modeling phase at
Wiggins Pass.
OBJECTIVE: To fund the next phase of numerical modeling alternatives at Wiggins Pass.
CONSIDERATIONS: Phase one of the modeling program for Wiggins Pass was completed in
September of 2007 and identified that the existing pass maintenance policies have accelerated
erosion of Barefoot Beach, eroded the pass protecting ebb shoal and the increase formation of the
flood shoal which caused channel instability. Additionally, it has been proven that continuing
with this course of action will accelerate and lead to a shortened dredge cycle with larger
quantities of material removed. It has been recommended from this phase of the study that the
Pass be reestablished to the naturally occurring, relatively self maintaining conditions that
existed 20 years ago. In the 1980's an 800 foot channel with a ML W depth of 4.5 feet existed.
Currently, a 400 foot channel with a ML W of 3.0 feet exists and requires dredging every 12 to ] 8
months to maintain.
The second phase of the model study needs to be funded to complete the FDEP required
alternative analysis. This phase will utilize system modeling to design and analyze various
options for performance and effectiveness. Structural and non-structural options will be
considered. Examples of some alternates that will be considered are:
l. No Action
2. Reconstruct Shoal without structures
3. Jetty
4. T-groins
5. Segmented Breakwater
6. Combinations of options like Breakwaters and T-Groins.
7. Temporary Structures vs. Permanent Structures under each scenario
Data from this modeling study is required to effectively analyze conformance to Collier County's
Comprehensive Plan and Land Use Code. Concurrently with this modeling program, CZM
would work with Collier County Environmental Services, Engineering and Comprehensive
Planning to verify Comprehensive Plan and Land Use Consistency. This analysis can not be
completed until a significant portion of the modeling program is completed.
After a consistency determination, a "Community Solution" would be developed via discussions
with all stakeholder groups, knowledgeable industry experts, the surrounding community and
FDEP. Not until this point would potential solutions be discussed. However, regular progress
updates would be held at the CA C.
Agenda Item No. 16D24
February 12. 2008
Page 2 of 26
FISCAL IMPACT: In order to proceed with the next modeling phase at Wiggins Pass, a
$150,000 budget amendment is required. This Fund (195) budget amendment will close out and
move available dollars in the amount of $] 34,910.27 from Wiggins Pass Dredging (2005) project
90522 to Wiggins Pass Modeling Project 90032. In addition, $] 5,089.73 will be transferred from
Fund (195) Reserves to Wiggins Pass Modeling Project 90032. The transfer from Contingency
Reserves does not impact the required set aside for Catastrophe Reserves ($3.000,000) or Major
Beach Renourishment Reserves ($4.000,000).
ADVISORY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: This item was unanimously approved
(7-0) by CAC members at their December] 3,2007 meeting with the following
recommendations:
a. Committee member Kulpa will chair a sub-committee consisting of various interested
parties to the issue
b. The letter from Nicole Ryan - representing the Conservancy of S.W. Florida
addressed to Councilman John Sorey dated December 13, 2007 outlining
recommendations from the Conservancy be included
c. Questions raised by committee member Pires from the October 2007 CAC meeting be
included
d. This recommendation include the summation offered by Dr. Pilkey and input from
the Estuary Conservation Association
This item was approved unanimously by the TDC at their meeting of January 28, 2008.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: This study is required to determine if the Wiggins
Pass Improvement Project alternatives are consistent with Collier County's Growth Management
Plan.
RECOMMENDATION: Authorization to proceed with Alternative Analysis Numerical
Modeling at Wiggins Pass and approve a $]50,000 budget amendment within Beach
Renourishment/Pass Maintenance Fund (195) to initiate the next phase of numerical modeling
alternatives required by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection.
PREPARED BY: Gary McAlpin. Director
Page 1 of]
Agenda Item No. 16024
February 12, 2008
Page 3 of 26
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Item Number:
Item Summary:
16D24
Recommend approval of Budget Amendment for $150,000 for next phase of numerical
modeling of alternatives at Wiggins Pass.
Meeting Date:
2/12/20089:00:00 AM
Approved By
Gary McAlpin Costal Project Manager Date
Public Services Coastal Zone Management 1/29120069:38 AM
Approved By
Kathy Carpenter Executive Secretary Date
Public Services Public Services Admin. 1130120088:19 AM
Approved By
Marla Ramsey Public Services Administrator Date
Public Services Public Services Admin. 11301200810:35 AM
Approved By
OMS Coordinator Applications Analyst Date
Administrative Services Information Technology 1131120088:32 AM
Approved By
Mark Isackson Budget Analyst Date
County Manager's Office Office of Management & Budget 211/20084:36 PM
Approved By
James V. Mudd County Manager Date
Board of County County Manager's Office
Commissioners 21512008 8:40 PM
file:IIC:\Agenda Test\Export\ 1 OO-F ebruary%20 12,%202008\] 6. %20CONSENT%20A GEND ... 2/6/2008
Agenda Item No. 16024
~:fi.1 _ cp~ ~ ~Ik ~ebr~~;~~
c-1-c. ~ Wi :r;I1~ ~
October 17, 2007
Question/Comments/ for County Staff as follow-up to discussion regarding
Wiggins Pass Modeling Study
1. Any opinion to be obtained with regards to whether or not placement of
erosion control structures is consistent with the 'Conservation and
Coastal Management Element ("CCME") and all the other elements of
the Collier County Growth Management Plan ("GMP") should be
provided by the appropriate person in the Community Development
and Environmental Services Department ("CDES"). There is a
formalized process outlined within the Land Development Code
("LDC") for requesting and obtaining formal interpretations and my
experience has been that any opinions rendered by the County
Attorney's Office are not binding under the LOC as opposed to those
issued following the formal interpretation process within the LDC.
Answer: Coastal Zone Management and the County Attorney's Office will
coordinate and work with other staff organizations to assure that other County
organizations are fully aware and involved in review/discussion process. This
has taken place to the extent that the COES Engineering and Environmental
Services Director, Bill Lorenz has be consulted on this issue and the
recommended review process for Environmental and Comprehensive Planning
Review.
Any decisions or opinions rendered will be consistent with and follow all policies
and procedures as required by the BCC.
No additional verification will be required by CAC members on information
provided.
2. Confirm that Hideaway Beach is not part of the CBRS, the Coastal
Barrier Resource System, and that situation is different, as Barefoot
Beach is within the CBRS.
Answer: Both Hideaway and Barefoot are part of the "Natural Barrier" systems
regardless of how they are administratively categorized. Additionally, the
northern part of Barefoot is developed similar to Hideaway. Temporary T-Groins
were an effective erosion control device that was used successfully at Hideaway
Beach. If properly designed, we would expect that temporary T-Groins would be
an effective erosion control device at Barefoot Beach.
F:\Wiggins Pass Modeling Study-Pires comments.doc
Agenda Item No. 16024
February 12, 2008
Page 5 of 26
3. How would the proposed erosion control structures protect, maintain
and enhance the natural function of the Barefoot Beach undeveloped
coastal barrier, [see CCME Objective 10.3].
Answer: The conceptual erosion control design contemplated under the August
2007 Wiggins Pass Study incorporates features that modify incoming wave
energy to the extent that shoreline stability will be improved and transport of sand
into the inlet will be reduced. The design does not block all wave energy
responsible for littoral sand transport, nor does it physically obstruct sand
transport.
The objective of the design is therefore to restore natural coastal processes to
more like what they were prior to realization of the cumulative dredging impacts
that have resulted in the loss of approximately 200 feet of beach and formation of
a receding erosion escarpment that has resulted in a beach littered with fallen
trees. The cumulative impacts have reduced the recreational value of the beach,
reduced the land area of the park, and destroyed upland coastal hammock that
was documented by Collier County Natural Resources staff as being gopher
tortoise habitat with numerous active burrows.
4. CCME Objective 10.3.4, states "Public expenditure shall be limited to
property acquisition and for public safety, education, restoration, exotic
removal, for recreation and resource facilities that will not substantially
alter the natural characteristics and the natural function of the
undeveloped Coastal Barrier System". In what category listed in the
foregoing would this erosion control project qualify?
Answer: Public safety, education, restoration, recreation and the use of this
beach a s an enhanced resource facility would all benefit from the elimination of
erosion and the restoration of the southern portion of Barefoot Beach. The
natural function and natural characteristics would be restored to this beach.
5. CCME Policy 10.3.6 prohibits "construction of structures seaward of
the coastal construction control line on undeveloped coastal barriers."
There is an exception for passive recreational structures, access
crossovers, and where enforcement would not allow any reasonable
economic utilization of such property. Please explain how this
prohibition can be bypassed?
Answer: Construction of structures seaward of the Coastal Construction Control
Line usually refers to vertical construction that is upland of the MHW line. That is
not the case here since this temporary structure will be horizontal and seaWard of
the MLW line. More importantly, this effort will restore a passive natural shoal
that will prevent erosion in the future. This passive natural shoal has a significant
environmental and recreational value to the inlet and beach.
F:\Wiggins Pass Modeling Study-Pires comments.doc
Agenda Item No. 16D24
February 12, 2008
Page 6 of 26
6. Please quantify the diminished recreational value of Barefoot Beach as
referenced on page 4 of the 2004 Humiston & Moore Feasibility Study.
Answer: The southern portion of the beach has eroded 200 feet. The upland
path to the beach is not usable due to the greater than 6 foot erosion drop off.
No beach exists as the tree line and other vegetation trees is toppled due to
erosion.
7. Please quantify the number of sea turtle nests that have been
adversely impacted by erosion of 300-400 feet of the inlet at the South
end of Barefoot Beach.
Answer: Detailed information is not available but it stands to reason that if no
beach exists that there is no place for sea turtles to nest.
8. Please quantify the number of Gopher Tortoise active burrows that
have been adversely impacted by the erosion of approximately 300-
400 feet of the inlet at the South end of Barefoot Beach.
Answer: In 2004 Collier Count Natural Resources staff identified thirteen active
gopher tortoise burrows on the south portion of Barefoot Beach in the area that
was being threatened by erosion. There has been no follow-up study to
determine how many of these burrows may have been lost since then. There is
no information on the number of nests that were lost as the result of the 200 feet
of erosion that has been documented.
9. Please address the possibility of the reopening of Little Hickory Pass
as outlined in the PUD for Lely Barefoot Beach, Ordinance No. 06-22
and more specifically Exhibit C that limits development in the area
formerly known as Little Hickory Pass and states: "The Active
Community Recreation Area" is located at site of the former Little
Hickory Pass. The existence of the former pass, the well-developed
back-barrier channels converging at this point, and the sites low
elevation result in a high potential for island embreachment during a
major coastal storm."
Please explain why this consideration and possibility is not taken into
account in the Modeling Study.
Answer: Little Hickory Pass is an old inlet that no longer exists approximately 2
miles north of Wiggins Pass between monuments R6 and R7. Little Hickory
Pass closed on its own when it had significantly more tidal prism. Both Wiggins
Pass and Big Hickory Pass are larger now and carry more of the tidal prism from
the common bay area making it less likely that Little Hickory Pass would reopen.
F:\Wiggins Pass Modeling Study-Pires comments.doc
Agenda Item No. 16024
February 12, 2008
Page 7 of 26
.
10. Please address the prohibition contained within Section 3.03.0l.C of
the Land Development Code that prohibits filling on undeveloped
coastal barriers, with certain limited exceptions.
Answer: The effort would be to restore the natural condition to Barefoot Beach,
filling would be to replace eroded beach and restore natural vegetation.
F:\Wiggins Pass Modeling Study-Pires comments.doc
......
~]1
,4".- L" ~ O~ p~~,r~
p- Page 8 of 26
ESTUARY CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION
AGENDA FOR VISIT BY DR. ORRIN PILKEY
Title of Event: Environmentally and Economically Sound Methods to Maintain Wiggins Pass as a
Navigable Waterway" sponsored by the Estuary ConselVation Association
PUfPOse of Event: To convene local and national experts, government officials, waterway users, and
interested citizens to discuss environmentally and economically sound methods of maintaining Wiggins
Pass as a navigable waterway.
Participants will discuss the following topics:
1) history of Wiggins Pass in relation to the geological history of this area of the Southwest
Florida coastline;
2) history of efforts to maintain the Pass as a navigabie waterway and their costs and benefits;
3) future options to maintain the Pass as a navigable waterway and consideration of their
potential benefits and costs including the Humiston and Moore model; and
4) suggestions and recommendations for consideration.
SCHEDULE OF EVENTS:
WednesdaY,Oclober17,2007
11:10 AM - Dr. Pilkey - pick up at Ft. Myers Airport and check in at LaPlaya Beach Resort
1PM - Dr. Pi/key to Pelican Isle Yacht Club (PIYC)
1:15 PM - Luncheon Attendees:
Dr. Pilkey, Mr. Joe Moreland, Mr. Dick Lydon, Mr. Gory McAlpin, Mr. Geof Burgerhoff, Mr
John Findley ,Ranger Bob Steiger, Dr. John Steiger, Mr. David Roellig, Ms. Katie Sproul,
Ms. Kathy Worley,
2:30 PM - View of Wiggins Pass from PIYC High Rise Condo. (Peter Franck's residence)
3 PM - Water cruise of Wiggins Pass and Estuary
4:30 PM - Deport for Humiston & Moore's office for Briefing/Discussion
6:30 PM - Depart for cocktails and dinner at PIYC and continued discussions
Attendees: Dr. Pilkey, Mr. Moreland, Mr. Lydon, Dr. Fitch, Mr. McAlpin, Mr. Ken
Humiston, Mr. Burgerhoff, Mr. Findley, Mr. Steiger, Ms. Sproul, Mr. Nath
9 PM - Adjourn and return Dr. Pilkey to his hotei
Thursday, October 18
9 AM - Continued discussions in private dining room at LoPlaya Resort
12 Noon - Luncheon meeting /briefing/ discussion with "Persons With Interest"
Attendees: Dr.Pilkey, Mr. Moreland, Mr. Lydon Dr. Fitch, Ms.Sproul, Mr. Burgerhoff,
Ms. Kathy Worley, Mr. Nick Latch, Mr. Roellig, Mr. Humiston, Mr. Ananta Nath, Mr.
McAlpin, Ms. Donna Carron (Collier County Planning Committee, formerly on ECA Board),
Ms. Nicole Ryan (Conservency of SWF.), Mr. Bob Steiger (Delnor-Wiggins State Park
Ranger), CAe Represenatvie, District 2 Representative, Barefoot Beach Representative,
4 PM - Adjourn and take Dr. Pi/key to Ft. Myers Airport
~lD-~If/~
~e"""jte~.l1l.024
H'Fitlruary 1~,12008
Page 9 of 26
Title: "Brief Notes of Workshops Convened by the Estuary Conservation Association on
October 17 and 18, 2007 to Discuss Environmentally and Economically Sound Methods
to Maintain Wiggins Pass as a Navigable Waterway With Dr. Orrin Pilkey as a Visiting
Coastal Expert"
Puroose of Work shoos: To convene local and national experts, government officials,
waterway users, and interested citizens to discuss environmentally and economically
sound methods of maintaining Wiggins Pass as a navigable waterway
Maior Tooics to Be Discussed:
I. History of Wiggins Pass in relation to the geological history of this region
of the Southwest Florida coastline;
2. History of efforts to maintain the Pass as a navigable waterway and their
lessons, costs, benefits, and problems;
3. Future options to maintain the Pass as a navigable waterway and consideration
of their potential costs, benefits, and risks; and
4. Suggestions and recommendations for consideration
Schedule of W orkshoo Events
A. Wednesday, October 17, 2007
1. Lunch with Dr. Pilkey at the Pelican Isle Yacht Club (1:15 pm to 2:30 pm)---
Notes taken
2. View of Wiggins Pass from the Pelican Isle High Rise Condo of Peter Franck
(2:30 pm to 3 pm)--Notes taken
3. Cruise in the Cocohatchee Estuary and Wiggins Pass (3 pm to 4:30 pm)---
Notes taken
4. Briefing and Discussion of Humiston and Moore's Model and Report at
the Cocohatchee Coast Guard Station (4:30 pm to 6:15 pm)--Notes taken
5. Dinner at the Pelican Isle Yacht Club (6:30 pm to 9 pm)
B. Thursday, October 18, 2007
I. Morning review of progress with the central question of identifying challenges
and best management practices that can be taken to sustain Wiggins Pass as a
navigable waterway within an Outstanding Florida Water between to parks
established for conservation and recreation (9 am to noon)--Notes taken
2. Lunch at the La Playa Resort
Lists ofParticioants at Workshoo Events Where Notes Were Taken
A. Wednesday, October 17, 2007
1. Lunch at the Pelican Isle Yacht Club
a. Greeter: Joe Moreland
b. Participants: Mr. GeoffBurgerhoff, Mr. Jim Burke, Me. David Busher,
Ms. Donna Caron, Mr. John Findley, Mr. Ezell Givens.
Ms. Heidi Kulpa, Mr. Dick Lydon, Mr. Gary McAlpin,
Christina Olsen, Dr. Orrin Pilkey, Mr. David Roellig,
Ms. Nicole Ryan, Dr. John Staiger, Mr. Robert Steiger,
Me. Sri Tammisette, Ms. Kathy Worley
I
Agenda Item No. 16024
February 12, 2008
Page 10 of 26
2. View of Pass from High Rise Condo
a. Informal Speaker: Mr. Gary McAlpin
b. Participants: Mr. GeoffBurgerhoff, Mr. Jim Burke, Mr. David Busher,
Ms. Donna Caron, Mr. John Findley, Mr. Ezell Givens,
Ms. Heidi Kulpa, Mr. Dick Lydon, Mr. Gary McAlpin,
Mr. Joe Moreland, Christina Olsen, Dr. Orrin Pilkey,
Mr. David Roellig, Ms. Nicole Ryan, Dr. John Staiger,
Mr. Robert Steiger, Mr. Sri Tammisette, Ms. Kathy Worley
3. Cruise
a. Informal Speaker: Mr. Gary McAlpin
c. Participants: Mr. GeoffBurgerhoff, Mr. John Findley, Mr. Ken Humiston,
Mr. Ezell Givens, Ms. Heidi Kulpa, Mr. Dick Lydon,
Mr. Joe Moreland, Christina Olsen, Dr. Orrin Pilkey,
Mr. David Roellig, Ms. Nicole Ryan, Dr. John Staiger,
Mr. Robert Steiger, Mr. Sri Tammisette, Ms. Kathy Worley
4. Huminston and Moore Model and Report
a. Speaker: Mr. Ken Humiston, Dr. Mohamed Dabees, Dr. Orrin Pilkey
b. Participants: Mr. GeoffBurgerhoff, Mr. Jim Burke, Mr. David Busher,
Ms. Donna Caron, Mr. John Findley, Mr. Ezell Givens,
Ms. Heidi Kulpa, Mr. Dick Lydon, Mr. Gary McAlpin,
Mr. Joe Moreland, Christina Olsen, Mr. David Roellig,
Ms. Nicole Ryan, Dr. John Staiger, Mr. Robert Steiger,
Mr. Sri Tammisette, Ms. Kathy Worley
5. Dinner
a. Participants: Mr. Geoff Burgerhoff, Ms. Donna Caron,
Dr. Mohamed Dabees, Mr. John Findley, Dr. John Fitch,
Mr. Ken Humiston, Mr. Joe Moreland, Dr. Orrin Pilkey
B. Thursday, October 18, 2007
1. Morning Review:
a. Facilitator: Dr. John Fitch
b. Participants: Mr. GeoffBurgerhoff, Mr. John Findley, Mr. Ezell Givens,
Mr. Joe Moreland, Christina Olsen, Dr. Orrin Pilkey,
Mr. David Roellig, Ms. Nicole Ryan, Dr. John Staiger.
Mr. Robert Steiger, Mr. Sri Tammisette, Ms. Kathy Worley
2
-
Agenda Item No. 16024
February 12, 2008
Page 11 of 26
SummarY of: Discussion of Enyironmentally and Economically Sound Methods to
Maintain Wil!l!ins Pass as a Nayil!able Waterwav With Dr. Orrin Pilkev as a
Visitinl! Coastal Exuert
The Wiggins Pass Estuary System's designation as a Florida Outstanding Water
represents a commitment and partnership between public and private stakeholders to
sustain the ecological and recreational significance of Wiggins Pass for present and future
generations.
Movement of sand is an issue which threatens the ecological and recreational
significance of the Wiggins Pass Estuary System. From an ecological perspective Sand
Movement is causing erosion at Bare Foot Beach Preserve and Accretion at Oelnor
Wiggins Pass State Park. From a recreational perspective Sand Movement requires that
the Wiggins Pass Inlet be proactively managed to assure channel safety for boaters.
In October workshops were Convened by the Estuary Conservation Association
on October 17 and 18, 2007 to "Discuss Environmentally and Economically Sound
Methods to Maintain Wiggins Pass as a Navigable Waterway With Dr. Orrin Pilkey as a
Visiting Coastal Expert". The following is a list of major topics that were discussed:
1. History of Wiggins Pass in relation to the geological history of this region
of the Southwest Florida coastline;
2. History of efforts to maintain the Pass as a navigable waterway and their
lessons, costs, benefits, and problems;
3. Future options to maintain the Pass as a navigable waterway and consideration
oftheir potential costs, benefits, and risks; and
4. Suggestions and recommendations for consideration
3
Agenda Item No. 16024
February 12, 2008
Page 12 of 26
Discussions of these major topics created a dialogue between public and private
stakeholders. At the conclusion of these discussions, public and private stakeholders were
unified based upon the following points:
I. Erosion at Barefoot Beach is leading to Accretion at Wiggins Pass Inlet.
2. Maintaining Safe Navigation at Wiggins Pass Inlet Will Require Preventing
Erosion At Barefoot Beach.
3. Erosion at Barefoot Beach Can Be Prevented Through Management Actions
That Encourage Accretion at the Barefoot Beach Shoal Where Erosion Is
Occurring.
4. Every Effort Should Be Made To Encourage Accretion at The Barefoot Beach
Shoal Where Erosion Is Occurring Without Using Permanent Structures.
Temporary Structures Should Be Considered Only If They Stabilize Accretion
And Can Be Taken Out As Soon As Possible.
5. Precision Maintenance Dredging Year Round Should Be Considered In
Conjunction With Actions To Increase Accretion Of The Barefoot Beach
Shoal Where Erosion Is Occurring.
6. Proactive Movement Of Channel Markers Should Be Considered As A Means
Of Keeping Boaters Informed During Efforts To Encourage Accretion At The
Barefoot Beach Shoal Where Erosion Is Occurring.
7. Points 1-6 Were Reflections OfIdeas Generated. All Participants Agreed That
There Need To Be Further Discussions To Ensure That Every Approach That
Is Environmentally Sound And Maintains Navigability Is Incorporated Into
Plans. Therefore, We Recommend That Additional Workshops With
Nationally Recognized Experts Should Be Convened by the Estuary
4
,
Agenda Item No. 16024
February 12, 2008
Page 13 of 26
Conservation Association to Continue Discussion of Environmentally and
Economically Sound Methods to Maintain Wiggins Pass as a Navigable
Waterway.
5
~IIZ ~~~y~
. ~:'P'n~::",".;;;;".'@m-;"~~~ ~ ~
~da Itenl?~ toot26
~rr February 12. 2008
Page 14 of 26
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2007 3:07 PM
To: McAlpinGary
Subject: Fw: WIGGINS PASS WORKSHOP SUMMARY OCT.17-18 2007
Gary, FYI heldi
- Original Message __m
From: JMorel2409@aol.com
To: crowehrc@earthlink.net ; BJBurkhard@comc<1st./'1jlJ ; QolsQn@lifejonovations.com ;
Ezell.Givens@deo.state.fl.us ; DL YDON124@aol.cQJTI ; lohnfindley@oivc.net ; .iJlfitch@comcast.net;
dsroellia@naoles.net ; KSoroyl@barroncollier.com ; JCSIAIGER@MSN,COM : Kathvw@conservancv.org ;
9.I2!!r!ler@eagle.fgcu.edu ; kh@humlstonandmoore.com ; srinivias.tammiselti@deO.state.fl.us ;
mark.latch@deo.state.fl.us ; robert.steiaer@deo.state.fl.us ; direed@comcast.net ; theriahtoerson@msn.com ;
davidbusher@comcast.net; heidikuloa@msn.c,om; GarvMcAlpin@collieraov,net; Mherrmann219@aol.com;
NlcoleR@conservancVcoIQ ; JMorel2409@aol.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2007 2:29 PM
Subject: WIGGINS PASS WORKSHOP SUMMARY OCT.17-18 2007
Below please find the summary of discussion points raised during the workshop discussions. Also included are
expanded comments by the Florid DEP, and should be considered as part of the summary.
Thank for participating. I hope you will agree that this effort of focused discussion and exchange of thoughts
was a productive step in the right direclion.
Respectfully,
Joe
Joe Moreland
Estuary Conservation Association
Title: "Brief Notes of Workshops Convened by the Estuary Conservation Association on October 17
and 18, 2007 to Discuss Enviromnentally and Economically Sound Methods to Maintain Wiggins
Pass as a Navigable Waterway With Dr. Orrin Pilkey as a Visiting Coastal Expert"
Purpose of Workshops: To convene local and national experts, government officials, waterway users,
and interested citizens to discuss enviromnentally and economically sound methods of maintaining
Wiggins Pass as a navigable waterway
Major Topics to Be Discussed:
1. History of Wiggins Pass in relation to the geological history of this region
of the Southwest Florida coastline;
2. History of efforts to maintain the Pass as a navigable waterway and their
lessons, costs, benefits, and problems;
3. Future options to maintain the Pass as a navigable waterway and consideration
of their potential costs, benefits, and risks; and
4. Suggestions and recommendations for consideration
Schedule of Workshop Events
12/6/2007
Agenda ItenIi'~ ~
February 12, 2008
Page 15 of 26
A. Wednesday, October 17,2007
1. Lunch with Dr. Pilkey at the Pelican Isle Yacht Club (1:15 pm to 2:30 pm)---
Notes taken
2. View of Wiggins Pass from the Pelican Isle High Rise Condo of Peter Franck
(2:30 pm to 3 pm)--Notes taken
3. Cruise in the Cocohatchee Estuary and Wiggins Pass (3 pm to 4:30 pm)---
Notes taken
4. Briefing and Discussion of Humiston and Moore's Model and Report at
the Cocohatchee Coast Guard Station (4:30 pm to 6:15 pm)--Notes taken
5, Dinner at the Pelican Isle Yacht Club (6:30 pm to 9 pm)
B. Thursday, October 18, 2007
1. Morning review of progress with the central question of identifYing challenges
and best management practices that can be taken to sustain Wiggins Pass as a
navigable waterway within an Outstanding Florida Water between to parks
established for conservation and recreation (9 am to noon)--Notes taken
2. Lunch at the La Playa Resort
Lists of Participants at Workshop Events Where Notes Were Taken
A. Wednesday, October 17, 2007
1. Lunch at the Pelican Isle Yacht Club
a Greeter: Joe Moreland
b. Participants: Mr. GeoffBurgerhoff, Mr. Jim Burke, Mr. David Busher,
Ms. Donna Caron, Mr. John Findley, Mr. Ezell Givens,
Ms. Heidi Kulpa, Mr. Dick Lydon, Mr. Gary McAlpin,
Christina Olsen, Dr. Orrin Pilkey, Mr. David Roellig,
Ms, Nicole Ryan, Dr. John Staiger, Mr. Robert Steiger,
Mr. Sri Tammisette, Ms. Kathy Worley
2. View of Pass from High Rise Condo
a. Informal Speaker: Mr. Gary McAlpin
b. Participants: Mr. GeoffBurgerhoff, Mr. Jim Burke, Mr. David Busher,
Ms. Donna Caron, Mr. John Findley, Mr. Ezell Givens,
Ms. Heidi Kulpa, Mr. Dick Lydon, Mr. Gary McAlpin,
Mr. Joe Moreland, Christina Olsen, Dr. Orrin Pilkey,
Mr. David Roellig, Ms. Nicole Ryan, Dr. John Staiger,
Mr. Robert Steiger, Mr. Sri Tammisette, Ms. Kathy Worley
3. Cruise
a. Informal Speaker: Mr. Gary McAlpin
c. Participants: Mr. GeoffBurgerhoff, Mr. John Findley, Mr. Ken Humiston,
Mr. Ezell Givens, Ms. Heidi Kulpa, Mr. Dick Lydon,
Mr. Joe Moreland, Christina Olsen, Dr. Orrin Pilkey,
Mr. David Roellig, Ms. Nicole Ryan, Dr. John Staiger,
Mr. Robert Steiger, Mr. Sri Tammisette, Ms. Kathy Worley
4. Huminston and Moore Model and Report
a. Speaker: Mr. Ken Humiston, Dr. Mohamed Dabees, Dr. Orrin Pilkey
b. Participants: Mr. GeoffBurgerhoff, Mr. Jim Burke, Mr. David Busher,
12/6/2007
Agenda Iterii'~ ~
February 12. 2008
Page 16 of 26
Ms. Donna Caron, Mr. John Findley, Mr. Ezell Givens,
Ms. Heidi Kulpa, Mr. Dick Lydon, Mr. Gary McAlpin,
Mr. Joe Moreland, Christina Olsen, Mr. David Roellig,
Ms. Nicole Ryan, Dr. John Staiger, Mr. Robert Steiger,
Mr. Sri Tammisette, Ms. Kathy Worley
5. Dinner
a Participants: Mr. GeoffBurgerhoff, Ms. Donna Caron,
Dr. Mohamed Dabees, Mr. John Findley, Dr. John Fitch,
Mr. Ken Humiston, Mr. Joe Moreland, Dr. Orrin Pilkey
B. Thursday, October 18, 2007
1. Morning Review:
a. Facilitator: Dr. John Fitch
b. Participants: Mr. GeoffBurgerhoff, Mr. John Findley, Mr. Ezell Givens,
Mr. Joe Moreland, Christina Olsen, Dr. Orrin Pilkey,
Mr. David RoeIlig, Ms. Nicole Ryan, Dr. John Staiger,
..___.Mr.R.obert steigg..Mr.Sri Tammisette,]v1s.Xathy Wor.!e.)'
12/6/2007
Agenda Iter1?W 1alf~
February 12, 2008
Page 17 of 26
Summary of: Discussion of Environmentally and Economically Sound Methods to Maintain
Wiggins Pass as a Navigable Waterway With Dr. Orm. Pilkey as a VisJting Coastal Expert
The Wiggins Pass Estuary System's designation as a Florida Outstanding Water represents a
commitment and partnership between public and private stakeholders to sustain the ecological and
recreational significance of Wiggins Pass for present and future generations.
Movement of sand is an issue which threatens the ecological and recreational significance of
the Wiggins Pass Estuary System. From an ecological perspective Sand Movement is causing erosion
at Bare Foot Beach Preserve and Accretion at Delnor Wiggins Pass State Park. From a recreational
perspective Sand Movement requires that the Wiggins Pass Inlet be pro actively managed to assure
channel safety for boaters.
In October workshops were Convened by the Estuary Conservation Association on October
17 and 18, 2007 to "Discuss Environmentally and Economically Sound Methods to Maintain Wiggins
Pass as a Navigable Waterway With Dr. Orrin Pilkey as a Visiting Coastal Expert". The following is
a list of major topics that were discussed:
1. History of Wiggins Pass in relation to the geologicalltistory of this region
of the Southwest Florida coastline;
2. History of efforts to maintain the Pass as a navigable waterway and their
lessons, costs, benefits, and problems;
3. Future options to maintain the Pass as a navigable waterway and consideration
of their potential costs, benefits, and risks; and
4. Suggestions and recommendations for consideration
Discussions of these major topics created a dialogue between public and private stakeholders. At the
conclusion of these discussions, public and private stakeholders were unified based upon the
following points:
1. Erosion at Barefoot Beach is leading to Accretion at Wiggins Pass Inlet.
2. Maintaiuing Safe Navigation at Wiggins Pass Inlet Will Require Preventing Erosion At
Barefoot Beach.
3. Erosion at Barefoot Beach Can Be Prevented Through Management Actions That
Encourage Accretion at the Barefoot Beach Shoal Where Erosion Is Occurring.
4. Every Effort Should Be Made To Encourage Accretion at The Barefoot Beach Shoal
Where Erosion Is Occurring Without Using Permanent Structures. Temporary Structures
Should Be Considered Only If They Stabilize Accretion And Can Be Taken Out As Soon
As Possible.
5. Precision Maintenance Dredging Year Round Should Be Considered In Conjunction With
12/6/2007
Agenda Jte~!l.Sj~m
February 12. 2008
Page 18 of 26
Actions To Increase Accretion Of The Barefoot Beach Shoal Where Erosion Is Occurring.
6. Proactive Movement Of Channel Markers Should Be Considered As A Means Of Keeping
Boaters Informed During Efforts To Encourage Accretion At The Barefoot Beach Shoal
Where Erosion Is Occurring.
7. Points 1-6 Were Reflections OfIdeas Generated. All Participants Agreed That There Need
To Be Further Discussions To Ensure That Every Approach That Is Environmentally
Sound And Maintains Navigability Is Incorporated Into Plans. Therefore, We Recommend
That Additional Workshops With Nationally Recognized Experts Should Be Convened by
the Estuary Conservation Association to Continue Discussion of Environmentally and
Economically Sound Methods to Maintain Wiggins Pass as a Navigable Waterway.
12/6/2007
-
Agenda Ita'O.~eM4
February 12. 2008
Page 19 of 26
Comments Submitted By Meeting Partici.p-ants
Florida Department of Environmental Protection
From: Olson, Christina
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 1:03 PM
To: 'gburger@eagle.fgeu.edu'
Ce: 'Jmorel2409@aol.com'; Subie, Valinda; Givens, Ezell; Latch, Mark; Tammisetti, Srinivas; Steiger, Robert;
Hingtgen, Terry
Subject: PN: DRAFT" SUMMARY OF OCT 22/23 WIGGINS PASS WORK SHOP
Here are the combined comments from the DEP-Division of Recreation and Parks in regards to the
summary of the October ECA workshops and an attached document illustrating recommended
changes to the text of the summary:
1. The accretion on the south end of the pass has been on the near shoai and iniet of the pass,
however, Wiggins Pass State Park has experienced erosion that threatens park facilities as a
result of Ihe current dredging activities.
2. Any modeling proposal or modifications should include a trigger point to protect Wiggins Pass
State Park from excessive erosion. This trigger point should be decided in conjunction with DEP-
Division of Recrealion Parks Coastal Projects Manager, Mark Latch, and Coastal Engineer, Sri
Tammisettl. Once that trigger point has been reached, an action will be required to either remove
temporary structures or mitigate the state park.
3. Renourish the beach at Barefoot Beach north of the Wiggins Pass.
4. Reconstruct the shoals on either side of the pass to reestablish the pre-dredging conditions.
5. Decrease the channel cross sectIon to increase the flow velocity within the channel.
6. Coliier County should consider an alternate dredge template as a way to nudge the inlet back into
healthy conditions as opposed to temporary structures that could shock the system and have
severe repercussions to the surrounding areas.
7. Side casting as Or. Pilkey suggested.
8. Collier County shouid consider purchasing a small dredge so that on an as needed basis a smali
amount of material can be removed to maintain a navigable channel.
9. Realigning channel markers on an as needed basis to properly guide the boating community.
10. Encourage partnership with WCIND to pursue cost effective dredging alternatives.
11. Biological surveys need to be undertaken of the existing Wiggins Pass shoals and inlet to fuliy
understand and minimize impacts to natural resources and habilat within the pass due to dredging.
12. Dr. Pilkey was very adamant that modeling of coastal processes can be highly misleading and
inaccurate and that coastal project managers should be very weary of these models. His opinions
shouid be more reflective in the summary.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Thank you,
Christina Olson (FLDEP)
M_."""'_"_'~__~__'~______'~'_"~_""_~
Check out AOL Money & Finance's list of the hottest products and top monev wasters of 2007.
12/6/2007
,
~JZ-
n~ ....".f _ Agenda ItenPlIge lEl1il2l
O/'YI r" r ~ February 12, 2008
trYV ~ Page 20 of 26
Subj: models
Date: 1012612007 11 :47:23 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time
From: QQi!~~uke.~j,J
To: JMoreI2409@aol.com, direed@comcastnet. micolgr@conservancy.Q[g,
obert. steiger<lildeo. state. fi. us, i. h. fitch@CQITlQ<lst.llel, ryou na@email.wcu.edu,
acobum<lilemi3il. wcu.edJJ
Joe Thanks for your letter
Re your question about why I am skeptical about the Humiston models. No
quantitative mathematical models of the shoreline have ever proved to be
accurate except in the short term of a few months or years. Things change at
the beach. Weather patterns and hence wave patterns change on a decadal
basis Bathymetry changes and hence wave pattems change on a monthly to
annual basis. And then along comes the storm - often from an
"unusual" direction with "unusuar' intensity for "unusual" duration. To
assume that we can describe beach behavior with mathematics is absurd. Below
is a list of parameters that determine nearshore sediment transport (from my
bargain $29.50 book) - of varying importance thru time and space. Most
models consider around 6 of these and the other 33 parameters are assumed to
be unimportant which may be true sometimes and sometimes not.
What are your altematives? 1. Assume that the models are a poor educated
guess that certainly wont apply for more than a few years - do nothing that
will damage the shoreline on the basis of these models and 3 dredge more
often or with different type dredges. Dont let the models drag you into
doing it on the cheap.
ALWAYS IMPORTANT
"Wave height
"Wave period- (time for passage of 2 wave crests)
.angle of wave approach to the shore
storms
.shoreface shape
feedback continuous offshore bar shape changes
.grain size
underlying geology- rock and mud layers beneath beach
.water depth
USUALLY iMPORTANT
offshore bar shape and location
The interactions of waves and currents
wave setup
Sunday. November 04. 2007 AOL: JMore12409
wave energy loss by friction (with sea floor)
seaward sand transport by waves
seaward sand transport by currents
loss or gain of sand from wind transport
loss of sand from storm overwash
coastal type, e.g. rocky, sandy, reef
sediment supply
engineering structures
revetments
breakwaters
beach nourishment
beachrock
nearshore winds
shell pavements
bedforms ripple marks etc,
bottom roughness
SOMETIMES IMPORTANT
bed liquefaction (quicksand formed as wave impacts)
beach state (e.g. pre or post storm)
storm surges
tidal range
tidal currents
offshore coastal currents
sea water infiltration
wave types
"Wave breaking parameters
wave reflection
infragravity waves
wave reformation (after breaking)
Sundav. November 04. 2007 AOL: JMore12409
Agenda IteiR.2rijjf~
February 12, 2008
Page 21 of 26
water temperature
sediment sorting
beach stratigraphy-vertical layering
shape of gravel and larger clasts
. specific gravity of sand grains
pore pressure from groundwater flowing from beach
organic mats on beach surface
downhill flow of dense sediment filled water
sediment chuminglburrowing by organisms
rip currents through the surf zone
seaward retum of storm surges (storm surge ebb)
Weill got that olf my chestl@1!
Orrin H. Pilkey
James B. Duke Professor of Earth Science Emeritus
Division of Earth and Ocean Sciences
Nicholas School of the Environment and Earth Sciences
Duke University Box 90228
321 Old Chern. Bldg
Durham NC 27708
Phone 919684 4238
Fax 919 684 5833
See: Useless Arithmetic (Columbia 2007), A Celebration of the Worlds Barrier
Islands (Columbia), How to Read a North Carolina Beach (UNC), The Corps and
the Shore (Island)
Sunday. November 04. 2007 AOL: JMore12409
Agenda Iterii'ltge JEl5m.
February 12. 2008
Page 22 of 26
a1r~ .If.
- kA j#
~nda Item No. 16024
February 12, 2008
Page 23 of 26
"lllIII
"Your Road Service At Sea. "
November 14, 2007
To Whom It May Concern:
Guardian Marine Inc. D.BA Sea Tow Naples is a full-time, licensed and insured
professional marine towing and salvage company with a fleet offour vessels. Sea Tow
Naples provides emergency and non emergency services to boaters on the waters of
Naples, Florida.
Sea Tow Naples fleet of vessels is ready and available 24 hours a day, 7 days a
week, 365 days of the year to provide mariners with premium marine assistance.
Sea Tow Naples has had an emergency response vessel in the Cocohatchee River
Marina for the past three years. This vessel covers the Wiggins pass area from the Lee
County line south to Doctors Pass.
The volume of calls in the Wiggins Pass area has increased significantly in the
last year. The "Sea Tow Vessel North Naples" located in Wiggins Pass is always
available but was only on patrol Saturday and Sunday. In the last year we have had to
add several days during the week to handle the call load.
The majority of the work we do in this area is related to vessels running aground
in Wiggins Pass. The pass has been a very difficult area to navigate for years but has
been getting progressively worse. Not only is it a hazardous pass for our Sea Tow
members but for our towboats as well. There have been many occasions when our
towboat will pick up a vessel off shore and arrive at the pass and have to wait for the tide
to come in for several hours to tow the boat through the pass in order not to damage the
vessel in tow.
I hope this information is useful and if there are any questions please feel free to
contact my office any time.
~~\:\
Capt. Jack Moran
OwnerlPresident
Sea Tow Naples
239-263-3188
seatownaoleslalseatow.com
51 West Pelican 51.
Naples, FL 34113
239-263-3188 (Office)
239-394-4108 (Fax)
Agenda Item No. 16024
February 12, 2008
Page 24 of 26
~
CONSERVANCY
Of Southwest Florida
December 13, 2007
-
-
-
1450 Merrihue Drive.Naples, FL 34102
239A03A213.Fax 239,262.0672
www.conservanr:::y.org
Chairman John Sorey III
Collier County Coastal Advisory Committee
Coastal Zone Management
3300 Santa Barbara Blvd,
Naples, Florida 34116
VIA: E-Mail
RE: Next Phase of Numerical Modeling of Structural Alternatives at Wiggins Pass
Dear Chairman Sorey and Costal Advisory Committee Members:
The Conservancy of Southwest Florida requests that any study of maintenance alternatives for
Wiggins Pass and stabilization of the south end of the Barefoot Beach Preserve focus on
solutions that are environmentally compatible and minimize the extent of man-made
manipulation to our coastal shorelines. As both Barefoot Beach and Wiggins Pass are part of
our natural shoreline system, they are constantly in a state of dynamic change. While the study
phase you are being asked to approve mentions non-structural alternatives as past of the
assessment, we are concerned that based on the conclusions of the August 2007 Wiggins Pass
Study, the need and appropriateness of structures on the beach are already a foregone
conclusion. The recommendation by Humiston & Moore was to consider erosion control
structures on the Barefoot Beach Preserve, The Conservancy asks that your approval of
funding for this next phase of study include a requirement to thoroughly and completely assess
non-structural alternatives, in order to determine the least impacting and most environmentally
sensitive set of solutions for this natural and dynamic shoreline system.
The Conservancy understands there is a desire to stop the erosion on Barefoot Beach
Preserve. However, all stakeholders must realize that shorelines are going to shift and change.
They are in a constant state of flux. Problems arise when communities attempt to maintain or
"fix" shorelines in a constant, or static, state, through structures, such as groins, A major
concern with all groins, temporary or permanent, T -groin or otherwise, is the fact that they are
artificially trapping sand that would naturally be deposited elsewhere. Such interruption of the
sand transport system can create man-induced consequences miles downstream from the
location of the structure, which may then result in addrrional structures built to relieve the sand
deficit.
In addition to our concerns over the physical impacts of structures on Barefoot Beach Preserve,
the Conservancy believes, from a policy perspective, the Growth Management Plan does not
Agenda Item No. 16024
February 12. 2008
Page 25 of 26 I
allow such structures on beach preserves, Policy 10.5.8. of the Conservation and Coastal
Management Element states that Collier County shall, "Prohibit shoreline armoring processes
and encourage non-structural methods for stabilizing beaches and dunes." This policy directs
the County to focus on non-structural alternatives, Without such assessment, any
recommendation to piace structures on the beach is premature and inconsistent with this policy.
However, we understand that as part of the next phase of study, structures on the beach will be
evaluated. Our request is that non-structural solutions also be fully explored. As you vote on
approval for this next phase of study, the Conservancy requests the following items specifically
be required as potential non-structural solutions to be explored:
1. As a solution to safety concerns, Collier County should immediately re-examine the
process in place for adjustment of channel markers. Currentiy, it takes months for
channel markers to be moved when a pass or navigation channel shifts, The
readjustment of these markers is imperative for safe navigation in systems where
passes and channels are dynamic and shift frequently, Collier County must accept that
these passes will migrate on a regular basis, and create a mechanism for working with
nature, instead of fighting the natural system, Thus, instead of attempting to dredge a
new, more "fixed" channel within Wiggins Pass, Collier County should determine a
flexible process for realigning channel markers, or instailing buoys, as a means to work
with the natural system as it migrates,
2, Collier County should examine the feasibility of purchasing a small dredge, or
contracting with a local small dredge operator, for inlet management purposes between
larger-scale dredge projects. This could allow for more frequent but less impacting
dredging, due to the reduced quantity of material involved. If a side-casting dredge were
considered, the dredged sand could be placed on the currently depleted north ebb shoal,
thus removing the need for iengthy permitting processes involved in placing dredged
sand on nearby beaches. While this may not replace the need for larger-scale periodic
dredging by outside contractors, it could be beneficial for in-between maintenance. In
addition, if the County did purchase a dredge, the initial costs of dredge purchase should
be balanced by the long-term use of the equipment and cost savings expected from
reduced large-scale contracted dredging, Collier County could also explore the interest
of Lee County, or other governmental entities, in potentially sharing the cost or the use
of a smaller dredge.
The environmental impacts of dredging must also be assessed, in order to determine
whether more frequent dredging with less quantity of materials removed is
environmentally feasible.
3. Collier County should examine non-structural alternatives for maintaining the pass and
inlet system between dredge projects, including determining the feasibility of building up
the north ebb shoal through pumping of the dredged sand to enhance shoal
development.
4, Collier County must acknowledge that any manipulation of the shoreline could have
unintended negative consequences for the environment. As such, incremental steps
versus more drastic and structural alternatives should be the priority, along with a plan
for changing the course of action, if necessary. Mitigation for unintended environmental
impacts must also be part of any process for pass maintenance.
5. Collier County should create an education, monitoring and enforcement program that is
focused on ensuring the three-foot draft maximum within the system is not violated by
boaters. As part of educational outreach, the County should also educate boater
regarding the potential constraints of using the estuarine system for boating during low
Agenda Item No. 16024
February 12, 2008
Page 26 of 26
tides, since some of the back bay areas are extremely shallow during low tide and
cannot accommodate boats with a three-foot draft.
6. There should be a continued forum for stakeholders to share innovative ideas for non-
structural solutions for accommodating boats of no greater than a three-foot draft in the
pass, while protecting the integrity of the natural system.
The Conservancy believes there are viable solutions available for management of Wiggins Pass
that are less-impacting and more environmentally compatible. It is the obligation of County
staff, decision-makers, community stakeholders, interested citizens and technical experts to find
solutions that work with, not against, nature. The Conservancy believes non-structural
alternatives for our beaches must be a priority as the County studies options for the
management of Wiggins Pass. A solution may be a blending of a variety of options, but the goal
must be to work with nature and respect our dynamic shorelines.
The Conservancy looks forward to participating in future discussions on these innovative
solutions. If you have any questions, please call me at (239) 403-4220.
Sincerely,
v7icdLv:?~
Nicole Ryan
Governmental Relations Manager
CC: Gary McAlpin