Agenda 06/24/2008 Item #16G 6
Agenda Item No. 16G6
June 24, 2008
Page 1 of 17
~-,
EXECUTrvESU~RY
Recommendation that the Bayshore Gateway Triangle Community Redevelopment
Agency (CRA) direct staff to draft a resolution to designate the property located at
4315 Bayshore Drive and the three adjacent parcels owned by the CRA as a
Brownfields Area, and to direct staff to ensure public hearings are conducted in
accordance with Florida Statutes in order to achieve Brownfields Area designation.
(4315 Bayshore Drive and three adjacent parcels.)
OBJECTIVE: To recommend that the Bayshore Gateway Triangle Community
Redevelopment Agency (CRA) direct staff to draft a resolution to designate the property
located at 4315 Bayshore Drive and the three adjacent parcels owned by the CRA as a
Brownfields Area, and to direct staff to ensure public hearings are conducted in
accordance with Florida Statutes in order to achieve Brownfields Area designation, (4315
Bayshore Drive and three adjacent parcels.)
~
BACKGROUND ON BROWNFIELDS: With certain legal exclusions and additions,
the term "brownfields site" means real property, the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse
of which may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of a hazardous
substance, pollutant, or contaminant (Public Law 107-118 [H,R. 2869] - "Small Business
Liability Relief and Brownfields Revitalization Act" signed into law January 11,2002),
This designation does not imply environmental contamination; rather, the designation
indicates that the designated site is abandoned, idled, or undercapitalized, and which may
be contaminated or may be merely perceived to be contaminated.
The Florida Brownfields Redevelopment Act was created to assist in the reduction of
public health and environmental hazards on existing commercial sites and to assist in the
reuse of Brownfields Areas and Brownfields Sites. The existence of brownfields within a
community may contribute to overall community decline, and brownfields
redevelopment, properly done, can be a significant element in community revitalization.
The Act is composed of four cornerstones that break down impediments to
redevelopment and can facilitate the reuse of commercial lands into productive,
economically viable land:
1. Uniform cleanup target levels;
2. Liabilitv protections;
3. Expedited reviews and time limits; and
4. Financial assistance,
The program is "voluntary"; where the person responsible for the contamination or a
person totally removed from the causation chooses to "voluntarily" cleanup and
redevelop the site.
/--
Program eligibility allows any person or any governmental entity who has not caused or
contributed to the contamination of a Brownfields Site to participate in the program and
execute a Brownfield Site Rehabilitation Agreement (BSRA) with FDEP. Any site is
- I -
Agenda Item No. 16G6
June 24, 2008
Page 2 of 17
eligible for designation by a local government provided certain statutory requirements are
met.
BACKGROUND OF CRA CATALYST PROJECT: The CRA owns a l7-acre site on
Bayshore Drive and this site is the location of a critical mixed-use catalyst project for
redevelopment The CRA currently has a contract to purchase 4315 Bayshore Drive, a
parcel which is adjacent to this l7-acre site. The assembly of the l7-acres and the new
parcel would result in a contiguous tract of land totaling nearly 18 acres (see Exhibit A).
The CRA has been working on a plan for developing this site with a reuse that will
catalyze redevelopment along the Bayshore Drive Corridor.
The 0.63 acre parcel which is now under contract with the CRA has been used as an
automotive repair shop and related uses for nearly four decades. A Phase II study shows
ground contamination stemming from underground storage tanks that stored leaded
gasoline from 1969 to 1970 (see Exhibit B). As such, this site meets the criteria for
receiving designation as a Brownfields Area.
CONSIDERATIONS: Only the Board of County Commissioners can designate a
Brownfields Area in accordance with Florida Statutes (9376.80, F. S.). Designating this
site as a Brownfields Area will benefit the community in four important ways:
,~.
(I) It will ensure that the contaminated area is remediated to the standards of the US
EPA, thus protecting the health, safety and welfare of the public;
(2) It will add to the total area to be used for a critical mixed-use catalyst project of
the agency;
(3) It will allow the CRA to acquire the land and enjoy limited exposure to liabilities
associated with contaminated land which the CRA could not obtain without the
designation; and
(4) It will allow the CRA to leverage agency funds against federal and state funds
available for brownfields remediation, rehabilitation and redevelopment through
various funding opportunities, such as grants.
Without a brownfields designation, the CRA will have very limited options for funding
the remediation, rehabilitation, and redevelopment of the site. Furthermore, if the CRA
does not redevelop the site, it is likely the private sector will continue to use the site
without remediating the contamination, thus compromising the efforts of the CRA to
alleviate blight and allowing a potential threat to the public health, safety and welfare to
perpetuate. In short, the acquisition of this 0.63 acre site and the near-term remediation of
its contamination are tasks that are consistent with the mission of the CRA.
The CRA-Advisory Board has discussed Brownfields Area designations with regard to
the subject site in public meetings and unanimously supports the Resolution to designate
the subject site a Brownfields Area.
- 2 -
Agenda Item No. 16G6
June 24, 2008
Page 3 of 17
---.
FISCAL IMPACT: Officially designating the CRA Mixed-Use Catalyst Project site a
Brownfields Area has no fiscal impact outside of staff time required to draft the
resolution and oversee the public par1icipation component of the process.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: Policy 4.7 of the Future Land Use Element of
the Growth Management Plan states that redevelopment plans may be developed for
specific areas within the County, including the Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA, which
may consider alternative land use plans, modifications to development standards,
improvements to infrastructure and incentives to encourage redevelopment. Objective 1.1
of the Economic Element states that Collier County will encourage the conservation and
enhancement of those natural, cultural, and social resources that represent the foundation
of the County's existing retirement, recreation, and tourist-oriented economy, in order to
place the County in a competitive position to enable the retention and expansion of these
and other business opportunities,
RECOMMENDATION: That the Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA direct staff to draft
a resolution to designate the property located at 43 J 5 Bayshore Drive and the three
adjacent parcels owned by the CRA as a Brownfields Area for approval by the Board of
County Commissioners, and to direct staff to ensure public hearings are conducted in
accordance with Florida Statutes in order to achieve Brownfields Area designation. (43 J 5
Bayshore Drive and three adjacent parcels.)
r'
Prepared by:
Sue Trone on June 12, 2008
Operations Analyst, Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Community Redevelopment Agency
~
- 3 -
/~
Item Number:
Item Summary:
Meeting Date:
Page I of I
Agenda Item No. 16G6
June 24, 2008
Page 4 of 17
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
16G6
Recommendation that the Bayshore Gateway Triangle Community Redevelopment Agency
(eRA) direct staff to draft a resolution to designate the property located at 4315 Bayshore
Drive and the three adjacent parcels owned by the eRA as a Brownfields Area, and to direct
staff to ensure public hearings are conducted in accordance with Florida Statutes in order to
achieve Brownfields Area designation. (4315 Bayshore Drive and three adjacent parcels.)
6124/20089:00:00 AM
Prepared By
Sue Trone
Community Redevelopment
Agency
Operations Analyst
Date
Bayshore~Gateway Redevelopment
6/12/20083:41:20 PM
Approved By
David Jackson
Community Redevelopment
Agency
Executive Director
Date
Bayshore-Gateway Redevelopment
6/12/20084:39 PM
Approved By
r--
OMS Coordinator
County Manager's Office
OMS Coordinator
Date
Office of Management & Budget
6/13/2008 8:21 AM
Approved By
Mark Isackson
County Manager's Office
Budget Analyst
Date
Office of Management & Budget
6/16/200811:07 AM
Approved By
James V. Mudd
Board of County
Commissioners
County Manager
Date
County Manager's Office
6/16/20087:07 PM
file:IIC:\AgendaTest\Export\11 0-June%2024,%202008\ 16.%20CONSENT%20AGENDA\I... 6/18/2008
ctl
Q)
<DOOr--.. '-
(')o~ <(
(00-
.,....N 0 (/')
ci~-~ "0
Z OJ""'" "0-
E ~ ell...- Q)
Q) :::> o..c:: Q) .-
~-, c:a ~ C
-g I a. 5:
1;, >< 0 0
<( ... ...
WQ.c:a
z.....-(
Q;
Ql
au..
a
'"
a
on
on
r--
a
............. .
........................... .
........................... .
..................... ... ... .
............... .............
.... .............. ..........
~::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
lL::: .J SEll C1V .
I
~Td~oP1
y ~,
(
................ ..... ...... .
................. .... ...... .
..................... .......
. ................. ..........
.... ... ........... ..........
................ ............
................ ............
..................... .......
............... ......... ... .
............... ... ..........
M3N
-y; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
.... ... ........... ..........
........ ........ .. ..........
.... ........... ... ..........
........ .. ..........
........ ........ .. ..........
................ ..
................ ............
..................... ...... .
/ v0: :!::::!:::::::::: ::::::::::
~:'~'='JJty::::::::::::: .
l
... ................. ... ... .
.... ..........
.... ..........
.... ..........
....... .......
............. .
........ ......
............. .
c-----
C10--3CfOHSXv6
I
.m
u;
'0
Ql
ro
c:
E
.lJl
c:
o
() ()
~DID
'C
c::
Q)
Cl
Q)
...J
c---~
o
rY
~
~
:::::i
.,'
I
1Il
Q)
~
u
"!=
!'-
~
'0
Q)
c:
;:
o
~
(
f/)
'0
'"
o
0::
1Il
~
'"
[L
I
i
I
I
I
i.
1\
c-------
------j
J
''-'
Agenda Item No. 16G6
June 24, 2008
Page 6 of 17
p:
,,-....
PHASE II EN\1RON!\1E1\IAL SITE ASSESS!\1ENT
Huben's Weldmg & Repair Facility
Folio ~5J4n I (,Xoou5
~3 J 5 Ba\.shore Dn\'e
'\op!es_ Florida 3~! ] 1
~
,
..
PREPARED FOR:
Mr DO'ld Jac"","
E:-.:.CCllli\(" Director
Bayshore Gate\';~ Tr:a.'1,S;le f'ommumty RedeH:lopmenl Agenc:
2740 Ba:$twTc- Dri',e. Unit1?
~aple~. Florida 34 t ! ~
PREPARED BY:
Ennronmenl"J R"l. :>lanagemenl. Inc.
r-:RX.l1 File 'Iu_ E~ 1:?'~A
\1a~ 13. 2IX~~
HCi.lLh!!;i.!I'l:,/n .. /5::'..+.'\ Tl!ltlW.'Ilf Jr,ul Sow/! _.,)'Ut)... rurt :.\I.n:T~ f-forhlu 33"){J:\
/ -S\''1'mF\F-..\f( r;\! r,' I.,\'.~ \'-.:.;t,s-(,..J(~",.) '" r "'.\' {-.,'\S,i-.-3(..\'-(/3_'y.. ~nnt' i.:rm.<u..'{
-~
EXHIBIT
~/
,~
'..)
Agenda Item No. 16G6
June 24, 2008
Page 7 of 17
. ~~~~~I~~~~~~~~~,:~~
Cl:RTlFICA TlON
FOR
PHASE 1I E'\lROl\'\IP,TAL SITE ASSESSME'\T
Hubert's Wcidtng '" Repair Facility
Folio ~:,-34(jl{I~0005
.HJ5IJa~5h~re Dn\e
'ap:~s. Florida .;;...l12
PROFESSIO~AL GEOLOGIST CERTIFlCA TIO~
Em. ironmentaI R.ts~ Management, Inc. (ER.\11l her~b! cc:nifi..::s the rcliabiht:." and
accllra~' or the scn ices perfDrmed in lht~ Ph~"e II Em ~ron:n~n:al Site AsSeSSrYle-nL al1d
the mfDrm::ltion prescmed in this report. 1111') report i~ ha...~(':d (m prof~sslOnnl sCf\-ices that
wer~ candll'"~lt:d using sound geolugic prinCIples and "Si.a]'1jard of Jndllsuy.' practices
The part; to \\ horn this repl'f1 is addressed may rel\ upon the coments of thts repan.
Dzlla deri..:ed Ihrough sampling and :5ubsequ~n1 I3.hoi3tnlY ::m.alYStS are e:\.1T3pol.:1l:?d. to
render ;m opjnion about o\'ernll sUD5urfa,,, condlt10ns Actual condttlons in arC-il':::: not
les:ed m3: dilTcr from those inf~rred 10 e'...i..t
P....pared by:
Em iron mental Risk Management. Inc
1524~ Tamiam] Trod South. SUlle xno
Fort !\1yers_ FJorida 33\)08
Signed
Stanlc~ 1. RulklL P G.
LIcensed PrOr~~~ifmnJ Geologist
S,ate of Flonda. License "umber PG-1W;3
D~)tC'.
HI"r,;/~!lliJtfL't,~ ... ..5:-1..\ ]JtrJiU'_';,' 7(0;'/ ,\"I!'l:/--::.'."IIJ .. j<'},"! ,\J.I.C.",,,, .Lr,r;~!~1 ~;'_~){f.'1
f -sss~r::":f--J/( ;,\f! (i -.\s,\'<,-."~;,...'-(,..J(,,.':J .. !-I.,.<: t_.....':\.'i.jt:,S_(,_7,~.) .. \',"'jl '\1 Cif)/I' ih"
EXHIBIT
13
Agenda Item No. 16G6
June 24, 2008
Page 8 of 17
~ ~,2~~.~~~~!~!~~~~!'~~~
1\1a~ J Y. 2WlJ~
~
~,
Me. Dil\ld Jadson
E,.;ecuti\ e Director
Bayshore GalewlIY Triangle Communny Redcyelopmenl Agen~
2740 BlIyshore Dme. Lni( 17
Naples. Florida 3-1!12
RI:;, Phase II Environmental Site Assessment
Hu~r1's Welding & Repair Fadlit~.
f' olio 1153401680005
4315 Ra}'shore Drive
l\allles, Florida 3411 Z
ERMI File No. E2125A
Dear Mr. Jllc!.scm:
FIl\lrnnmcmaJ RlSk \lanagemenl. Inc I I:R.M Ii h:" p""pared Ih.s I'h,,,e II En,ironmenta!
SHe Assessmcm IESAI report of Ihe alxne r.rerenced s\Jbjecl property in accordance
,,--ithom ContrJ.ct.'\~Teement t:'\;cculed on ApriJ2-l. 200[-;:. Plea.':ie refer to Figul"e 1 and
Figure 2 for tht:. SHe L()ca[[on f\1ap and Site Plan, respccti\ ely.
1.0 PROJECT UNDERSTANDING
ER\1J's I'hase I ESA idclltir."d the followmg potential emmmmcmaJ concerns:
. The Hubert's Welding & Repair facilil\. ,ubJect property_ is 11S1"d III the
fDEP Storage Tar.k RepDrt for prm iuusly mnintaimng t.~rec L'nd'~rground
Storage Tanh (LSTs) Based on IXTLLIS res'oarch and rogulalory me
rc\i,,,. tho LSTs h;,,'e been cI >sed In place. Ho" e\ er. [R\lI fo~nd 0"
e\ld~nc~ of lh~ filing of a Tank Closure Ass,;;,:;smen1 Report (TeAR)
which hClS b"on a requrrernenl und"r Chapler (,2-7(, I, Flori da
Admini.;trati"e Code lfAC) 'Sm~e 3ppro..jmalel~ It}'t\(,. This.
em ironm~ntaJ regulatIon requires the completIOn of a TC-\R a! the lime
the I~Tlks are closed in-pbc~ or rcmmc:d rrom [he sile Th~ TeAR
ducwnents the specllic lank ~llJsure procedures thai were conduclCd and
nsSC5S~S the sol! ;md ground\\ZLter qUa1L~ in the locaJucd area of the tan!...
~y~.h:m Since the~(' [j]J1ks \\'-~re dDs-cd in-r1acc prior 10 [flS(l. a TC:\R
\....::15 not re-quued at Ihat lime Htn\'e\'t:~L no assessment of 50:.1 and/or
h'TOund\\ukT quali1) in the locaIi/cd area of the lurmer 1im\.. ~ystem \'1'.1.'5
e'\cr docum-ent-:,d. Th.erefore. this former on-SHC' t3.:1h. s: stem area is an
ernirnnmt::ntal C(Jncern. FW1her imeSl!gatinn can be done 10 gain add1tional
st!t1l1i~ regardmg the potent]':1.! tbr ennronmenral risk '\lthin the abO\.c
refert:!ncc..:! area Tllis decision 10 conduct sampling and annly_"0S \I.-outd be
the u::\er"s dcd"ion. and _;;,;hould be based on the u.~er's n:.;1.. tillcnmce
Hf.:aL/"f~!I.Jt'h:"-' ~ J5:"...:.,\ jiinniuiu" /:c',i:-/ ,....~r!.l.'lh -"fJi'1 '" Fn.'''r.\~1':'''t\. F!,jr}~k, 33'JOs'
! -,\'s,\-f:t\;'J '-.\R;jll f l-..,.\'......-3t,\'-(,-+(:.SI ~ FL.il.\' /-.'.:s.<.....__~("...-~(,_~_~') ># Wh \-f cum !1l"
EXHIBIT
1-'
L)
Agenda Item No. 16G6
June 24, 2008
Page 9 of 17
na.l'{h()~ Ci"aleway T rianKlE CR."
Phil'J't' JJ Endronrru:ntul Sile AUe'X.'Il'ftL"lt't
M'!I' 13, 1{J(J8
HlJbert's Ifehfing if &pair F4diity. "'aples, FL
. ...1. hydraul!c hn sLltion w;)s. obsern~d on the subJect p:operl) dwing the
~ne reconnm~SMC~. TIle h~-dmulJc 11ft was l<x~a1ed on ,;::uncrele.
llydrauJic lif\s ha\t:.' tht:- potential 10 leak hyd:-uulic ilmcs. WhIChL:(1Uld
Imp<Jct th~ ~oll and groundwater In the \ icinily of the lift Concrete
~ta.imng \\as obsel'\ cd in COtlneCHOn \\"ilh the hydrauJic lift station This t~
d~fmed ac; a REC according. to the ASTI\'l Int~rnationaJ Standard
designari0i1 E 1.5~7.1_-ltL
. Se\ ern.! sturage c,.)mainers of \ illlOUS SlLe5 w~re obsen ~d on the subject
property during the site reconnmssance The conl~lners \\ere locat~d elf1
~OJlc-rctc a.~d contamed la\\ nm<mer and ,arlOll." 3utorn0blle partS and
yehicular oils St:\ l.:ml areas \\ere ob5~n"ed tel haye 'Concrete staining.
fui1l".er 1m eqig:HlOn can b~ done' to gam addluonal ~:;:,("unt:- n:garJmg !h~
pCHe:mal foreom'lr0nmentaJ ""k '\\ lthin jh~ 1!h{\'\ e r('f~rcnccJ ::t.reas.
IIowe\"er, thIs decIsion to conduct sampbng and ~naJysC$ would he the
I.lS~r"5 d;:-cislOn. i-L.'ld sr.ollld h~ bas,cd (Hl the user's fist.. tolerance.
2.0 PHASE II ESA SCOPE OF WORK
On April 311. cOON, ERMT conduCted the f0I1o\\in~ scupe uf\l ork.
. ER..\-H i:1smlled l\\o T~mpnr~ \1on;toring \\'cth tT\1\\'n on lh~ slJhjecl
~ro;Jer1y '\\ilhln the X("a.~ most lik.e!~ to be impacted_ Th~sc areas arc jdcnt!fi..:d in
the Proj~ct linder5tandm.L~
. ERl'dJ r:;;:IJ ~.;;.:e.c:;cd :hl2' :;olls rCnlO\cd .11 2-foOl depth intc;f\ab :r(:'!1l th~' \\~ll
installations and the borings conducted at randomly s,::"lCClc-d 1.ncations ,qlhln the
arc:!. n(the LIST Caml \\Ith an Organic \'apor i\nuJ~'er 10\'A). Soil bor.ng logs
and fleld noles arc Inolllded in Appendix A.
. ER\U ;:-ollected O;Jt' sod ~ample flG,l"i the rnrrner dt"pi,;,:':'i;:r 1.;.r~a ,-H the d.~pth
1l1l~n iil UUl.....'TmHlcd 10 ha\e the hibhtSl OVA screening \ aluc. Thi.:: ~"oil sample
\\"a5 'Submltl1;;'d to tm lronmemal Sci~ncc [[$C) L.1bo,awry :lnd n.!1al:-o/~d I'or
comm~1n p~tro[eum cons1Itu-er.ts \'Hl EPt\ \1etho.::1s i':U:: J B <L.')d 8310_
. ERMI collectedgroundwnter sJmp]~s from the lemporary m:.::nr!o:ir.~ ".ell
h.)Callon~. TI,:c groundwater samples \\-ere sub:nHted to ESe Laboratary and
unal~ led _for common pe!foJeurn caD::;uiuen:s 'w EPA j\"lelhclds g ':.1 2 1 B lli'1d ~31 O.
. ER\fI im..:-rpreled the soli and gr{\lmd\I,:H.;r quality findings ,alJd correlated \:he
resuJrs \\"1th the ;J.ppbcable FDEP dn(:umellled Chapter !J2.770. Florida
AdmlT\i:;,tr~ti\e Code (F.-\Cl cl~anup t\1rgel Ie, ds 10 alises" lhe- on.s1te smJ Jr'ld
grC':.md"\\'ul,.;-r qLiality at the ~.ampJC' 10callQnS FR\H prepared lhis !1nJl Ph;l.'Se II
ESA f'.:POr1 'nth graphi~s 10 surnmarl/:C the results. of tr.e aboye referenced '=.c0[1e
()f work.
l;.'mTnmmemal Ri..f.; AlanuJ{t""lJ.'nt. (,,,:
]
ER-\(J Filf: So Ell ~5.4
l EXHIBIT
I
.6
Agenda Item No. 16G6
June 24, 2008
Page 10 of 17
r-.
fJa."hl)rt Gale",,)' triangle CR ~
Phll:n: 11 En,';rofUUJ!nuJl Siu .-..tuesunt'ltl
,~flQ' JJ, 2(J(lS
Hu/k!rr'J H~ldjnJ: & Rf!ptlir Focilily'. N'upb. FL
Please refer 10 Figun 2 for sample locations and Appendix B for the labora:101'Y
analytical resultS.
3.0 SOIL ASSESSMENT
3.1 Soil Assessment Metboolllog)'
The general mcthpdolflb'Y for the sLlil assc::;Scnlenl \I.::,i.lS den' ~d from the FDEP
HGujde1in~s for Assessment and SQurce Remo\ al of Petroleum Contaminated Soir-
dated ~la, I 'N~. Our m'll1()dolob~ consisted of fidd ,cr.ening sod samples. During
the fLcld nont on Apfll 31,), 2U08. ERMI collected 5011 samples for OVA screcning
[rom si, ~oil borir\g~ (SB-I through SB-6t Grah soil ~a.'1"lples "ere taken ~t
npproxlnmtel: ~~r(lr...YI d~pt}, Inlennlsi 10 apPfi..)"xlrnmet) 1<~ [e~l wahm the
groUnd\\aler ~abli; ~ Site \1ap is iJ1clud~d a5 Fi~ure 2. '\fllCh Illustrates the
locations of Ihe si, soil horings~
r
3.2 Soil field SCn'elling and Remits
On April 30. 2008, ERJ\'lJ collected soil sIDlples frarn the Sl~ ~('!l henng, (SB.}
through SB-6J for jn~the-f1eld 0\".-\ screening purp(lS~S TIllS 5cre~ning \\as
compkted to In' eSHgate \\h~ther any petmleum hydrocarhons WEre present III soil
ab0\ C J.nd n(,nf 'the surface of the ground\\-ater table ill conccrnratj om; cotl~jd~red
rcprcscnt311 \-tJ of Impacts t11m n::ay be consIdered nexceSSl\ cly c,mraminalcdo, The
field screening (If these samples was conducted usmga PhO'Lc>-IoniLaliun Detector
(PID) O\'A 0\' A screening \Ya5 conducted b~ ~i.""~ll:ctjng soil rmm a $H1Jl1Ii:~~ steel
hand au.g~r then tran~f:.;rring the ~-(1il -:;;::rmpl-e~ into I (1 I.nmc~ rn~svn .Jars. ER.MI us~s
the s0I1 5ample neadspace screening procedure. as described m SectlOTI -1-.1 of the
f-"DEP '-Gllidc]inc-s fDl ::\~?~~;rnd Sq].1fCe Rerno.\ al or Petroleum Contammaled
Soli" dated Ma\ 19'JS 11le PIDOVA "as ,',eld calibrated prior l() u'e ER'v1J
collcct,~d one sod 51:.l11ple (SB~5 a 7ftl fur lal:tomlor:- analysis. The 501l borings "ere
backfilled a!1er sanlpimg.
In-the-field OVA ,-osults indicated deleCllonS of petroleum lclat~d H,latile organics in
the soil samples cotlect~d. Please refer to Figu.... 2 for the sample Incalkms and
Appt."ndi\..:\ for SOil ~orJ:1g logs and OVA results.
3.3 Soil Labomlllr)' Analytical R..'ults
fR'-11 colt~cled ones-oil $3.mp!c fwm the- bonng deplhin(~n..a! 1hal dlsplayed the
high~l O\'A r-e~ding and'or otfactClr;.- ()bse~a1ions for labo[awry analysis Th'.:' soil
sample collecled v. ,t5 ~ran:-::r~rr~d 10 the appropriate laboratoT)' sample containers ;J!1d
placed in an lc~d co(;.ler ar.d dc!iYNCd 0\ cn11ghl to ESe !.1hnT3tOry fDr ~r:;jI:.~lS The
soil SAmple submJl1~d W:L~ an:J..lYl.~d for CDrnrnon p'~lrok.Llm constiluenl~ nil EPA
:\.l~th(xh gUll B a::,J~31().
Copies of the complel~ hl.bof:llory anaj~ tical data revorts and cham-()f-cu~lOdy
documentalion arc in,;:ludr.)d in Appendix B.
En\'ironu1entdl Ri.~k ManrJj;emelJl. Inc.
3
ER.\l! File iVIJ.. E]1154
I EXHIBIT
A
u
Agenda Item No. 16G6
June 24, 2008
Page 11 of 17
/JaYfohore Gait't1V}" rrUmKk CR..:t
Pha.{(!' II Elfl"W"m-cnlal "ill? 4.ut"s.mU"nl
.~J"y J3. 2008
HIlbc!I1's Wc.-lding & R~pair FacilitYl .~'Qpks. FL
Analyses of the 5011 sample SB.5 a 7li \ ,elded detcc1able concentrations of Benzene
lO.5.:! mjlli~rranls per kilogram (mg,'kg,l). Toluene e26 mg..1.:gt Tmal Xylenes {3,fl
mgCkg), and \leth\1 Tefl-butyl ether ((t~4 mg.].g!. ,,!1,ch all c"ccd 1heir applicable
FDEP co:nrn~rcat Soli Ckmup Target le\els (SCTLs). liS per Table \' of Chapter
62-777 LAC IdfeCl1\e Apnl 17.21'(15) Plcase rcfenD Tablr] foc" Il!mm"", ofsoiJ
lab results.
4.0 GROUNDWATER ASSESSMENT
4.] WolI Con,truotion and ]nstallation
On .'\pnl 30. 100tt ERl\f1 Itl:;t3.Jl~d mo Ter:1poiury .\'1onttl.\nfLg 'Wells (J"\lW'-l ;:md
Th1\\' -2) II,) a depth of appn.l\imalcl~ 6 f~el using a de-an. manual hand auger \~ llh a
.3 2.5-mcb warnetc. hucket T!\t\V-l and Thf\\--,2 \\~re canstntcte-.d of 2-:nch diameter
PVC \\.111 .5 r~l or no 1 0 inch slotted ~creen section, 111(' annubr space he1\yeen the
well and the bor;;holc ,....:15 then nll~d "nn :::!IY3U grade silK;} s;:md to rOml a filter p3.Ch.
Th02 tGmpornry \\ dh \yere remo\.ed and bw:J..fill~d afl~r samplIng. TIle locati0n of
ThIW.] and TMW.: ore pre>emed in Fi~u", 2.
4.2 Groundwater Sampling Ml'fhodology
011 April 30. :qnx. ER~H personnel coll-eCI:=d grOlr.1d\\ater :;:amrk~ frnm lhe
tempc-r3.ry momlming \\(-'U5 (T\1\V~1 ~.,d T\1\\"'~21 in ;lccnrdance \\ith the
e:-tahllshed FDFP SOP ('llopCI! FS 2.2flU GmlliHlwater sampling p!'m(lCn~ dn::::W!l2';)t
dat~d. April CI. 21)il7 The \\,;:lls "\H'rc p'..rrg-;:-d prior to s~u-:lplmg U;jing n peristaltIc
pump. PUTg~ ,\ O-ter wns dlspe;-sed onlO the land sUlfacr and aHcw.:cd to e\-apOra1e or
feturn tD th~ ~urficiaJ aqwfer. The \\d\s \\ere rurgt"d until they met purge .:::ornpJe.ticJn
cnt:3'l";{L the ganmd"atcr 5.1.mples "ere :.ubmIUi;:>d t'l'l FSC l.aboratOry for ~laJysis.
The s3Tl1ples collect~d from T\'1\V-] .'~r,J T\H\-2 hC'r~ a11rr.lyzcd :-I)r pctfo]cml1
ccn::=.litu>;;:nlS by [PA \ktha0S :'W2iH ~.,d ~:3lO. Ground\':mcr sampling log.s a:-e
mdud'od in Append;' " and tll" !occtJon of 1"\JW-1 ond I\J\\'-2 ore pr~se"ted m
Figure 2
43 Gl'Ound" aler Labomtory Anal~ti,al Result'
Copi.s of tile complete iaboral!)" analncaJ da~a rep"" and 5ol11ple cham-of-custod,
doC'umenla1lon are mL:luJed in .App~ndix B, Pie.use rc'rer 10 Tabl~ 2 r~y'" ~l summar:
of ground\\,:cr Jab resul15.
.Analyses (Jf grollild\\aler samples collccted from temporary morutorinl~ \\.eii T~nV~ 1
: I~]d('-d dClecmbie conct:nfratlom: of l-\teth~.lnaphthJ.lene (y.:;l.O mi(rogrzrtls per
Lll;:r. p..:l L~. 2-!\1t.'[h\h'iJ.p!Jth~1.:-n-;:" j....j.:: 'I u:::.:'l'l .Jrd '\:lrhlklL.'JI-2 t;;i,!r L;g'LJ ttat
sligbtl)- e:\.c~d their applicable Slale of flonda Ground\\a1er Clemup Target LeyclE;
(GCTlst [J~r Tahle V 'Jr FAC Chapter (:'2-777 (eITec1.l\.t: Apnl17, 2nu5l. Anillys;s
of samplt:s t()Jl~cicd from T\~\\'-2 : i.::lded deleclahl~ '(mc'~ntr.J.tiof!s of Beo7ene
I:' I H !-1!;'..L) [th\ ib~I~/':112 \ I ~d I ~ ]1::; L 1. I il1~}1 '\': 1,?rK'"';:; ji,XI \ II :..l!:! L land :-... k:l1yl t..:11-
l1UI\ I eTh~r l':::'i.\l u;,:,'11 ilut ~\(<;:,;:,d 1 ll::;'l 1 ;q'pIICil,lr: :'.Eltt:' ('1' Fll~r1~b GCI Ls. p-=r TJ.r.I;-
V ~rFAC Chapt~r '{,='-777 i.cffecll\e April 17~ 2Ihj~).
Enl""mmm",,ral Ri\k .\fuIUJ[:("ffjrm. fllc.
.
ERJIl File. ,''''11. E:J25A
.~,
Bayshore Galet'''J TrUmgk CRi
PIUl"C 11 E"dronmcnud Site A.uesH,wnl
.1
I EXHIBIT
D
Agenda Item No. 16G6
June 24, 2008
Page 12 of 17
May 13, =008
Hubt!rt'.t Jfelding& Repa;r FaclTity. JVUplr.l, FL
5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDA nONS
In-the-iield O\'A results inmcaled e1eyated detectwns of petroleum related \olatile
llrganics in the soil samples collected from our subsurfac~ assessm-enl LnborntOJ;;
anal;ses of soli sample SB-5 a. 7ft yielded detectahle COl1ccntratiorls of RenLene 11),52
miliigrams per kiiogra..n lmg'kg)), Toluene f1.61ng..'kg), Total X::]enes O.{j mgi1.:g). and
Meth~'1 Tert.but~l e:her 10 ')4 mg.'1-gl. \\ hich all exceed their apphcable FDEP
commercial Sol! Cleanup Targ.t Le'eb (SCTL>l. "" per Table V of Chaprer 62-777
FAC (effect;,'e Aprtlll. 2110';)
I.abora!ory .analY5e~ t.)f groL.ll1d\\, ater sampler-; co] !eelect [rom t.;:mporary mornlOnng1l:eU
T\f\V-1 yielded detecmble concemrations or ] ~\1C'lh: lnapbthalclle (3~.l () mlcrognull5
P'" LJtef. ~~L). 2-lIkth,lmphrhokne (-130 }.tgLJ oi,,1 Nophtholel1< (3(," ~l"LJ thot
J..li~hll: ~~cecd th~ir ilppli(;lhte Stat~ (If f1('l'ida Cil\l\1JlJ\\akr Cl..:-anllp Tar.:.::et Le\"~15
~ GeTLs I. p~r TJh!~ V 0f F AC Chapter h2- ~ ~-: I cTIecll\''2 _-\pl it r'7o. =:Jt( I" ~ .\.Jl~ljy;;-=S c,f
.s.:1lnpl,~s collc-ctc-d from T\.f\\-.2 ~:!elded d~t..:'ct3ble (IJllC~n'fr::iIlf"11S; (If H,;,n/:;:n~ t ~ l.n
f.Jh'. 'L), Elh~ ih:~lllr.:IK' \1211 (I p!; L J. T ('1:11 X: lcn.:-s ((,SO OUi,;.'l.l :md 1\l::'tl"J: 'Ilerl-butyl
t.:tllt:1 ~~..t il .L~_.Lllbat~"\.c('~d the-II .1pplt(';')bk S1.:lh: (If FlmH.la GCTts. per Tabl-:- V of
l-AC Ch;1ptel"l,2-7-:' (dfTxtIY~ April] '. ~nil~).
f'
The dara colle<;ted from the complenon of thlS Pha,e Il ESA conducted al thiS facllJl;,
meet.;; the definition for the dls.cO\'c-ry of a discharge of pelfoleurn products at
c<mcctnratinn::. th.al c_'\ce-cd the State of F1nrida allr~\\.'cd cl~antJp target le\'els. .15 outlined
'" FAC rule ""-77(1.100 (16). Based on thi, informatIOn. [R\lI recommend, Lo.1 the
fncili1y o\yner ar operawr follu\\" ihe {'ontammatlUn Reponing proc,~durc-!; 3.." req~.nred m
the ennronmemal r~guIntjon referel1ceJ in Ch;~pH~r 61-77{t.250. fAC. In summary. lhis
regulallon st.-ales l,hal the owner 01' operator is r~quired ~() ~ubrnit a dlscharge reponing
fDrm (DRf) 10 the Sl31e or Florida uponlhe dis(.O\'erl of .,c<ssiye petroleum produCI
contarmnaUon a.t their fa;.:;llil;-. Adll:lionaHy. it stales that the owner mW;l initi;He a Sue
Assessment Repon (S..:\RJ inthm 30 days (d~ lh~ discoyery of e:-:cesRi\e c(Jntamir~,~li(m.
'J1,e SAR is required 10' horizontally and \~nj('~!l! ddineale'lhe ~,lenl of the recentlY
dlS.CO\ ~red ~\.ccs.~:;j\'C pcuok'um unpacts_ AddltionaHy. ~hi~ Tr=gulullon slales that the
SAil. is required 10 be submined 10 the FDEP "lthin 27(1 d~\'s i'J nwnlbs) from Ihe dale
of the dl5Cm"ery ofexcessl"e conl.lmmalil"n
Please do nol nesllaie to contuct <Jlher of the lJnd.rsTgned at (8R8) 368-6../68. or Inca1J~
J.t ~39-415~64n6. lr~'ou nan: any 4ue:ai(.m~ regan~ing thIS Tt'pon.
Sincerely.
E~\1RO~I\1ENl'At RISK MASAGEI\1EI\'r, INC.
" ,. ~
..; r. ~ --+.i.-0L-
I
/\my Allen
En\'ironmenlal Speciahsl
;..
..,:. ~.'", ;
Sud",' J. RUlka- PO
Princ~p.)l GeoJoglst
EU1';ronm~m.dl R;.~J,; .\fdn(J":~/tWnt.ln('.
J
ERlt.fl File No-. E2 J 15.4
<D 00.....
C.90~
<DO~
~NO
-'"
ci"<;j-...-- / ~
Z~(J)_I I
E c 'I '
,i!l-=;t !
(l)
u
c
"
0>
<t
'"
'"
"
'"
~
<
-
-;;:
;..
:::l
:l
~
,-
~
'"
~
'"
f-
~
i',
--
-
,.;
~
-
-"
'J: :
--
- : "
- ,
-
-
'-
:;
"
i
.
-
"
-
\
'-. --
1-
I -
I
,~ i
;,0._ I
i. H I
\ ::.:i:
,
i
!
~
n<1~\o."'m\' T)ri..~
I t:XHIBIT
r.
c:
,
~
-
'-'
~
i -~(
, ~
i ~ I
-
- , - ::;
" I ~ ,.
:.
- ,
, r ..
] - ,
..;. -
I .. " <l!!! -0'
,
'" , ",
, ,
, I ..
-
-
.
;;
/
- "
-"
~ Ii
~ I iJ"
.rl'
""
~
"
<l!!!~.
::r
:;;
~ ~;;;. ~~"'
t ....',-..1 ._.,_i7~
~I ",[ill': [
~!: =:J Illj II
~.~~~ LilJ b~
:;
-,
!:3~~
. "
.~ ... .... ~
..;.. r~:::
~;!'l~
:;;-~7
.
i
,
...
--
\
c.J1.~
~,.s
- ...
E--=' .5
7': 7'
~,~
- ,
......i
~.
i;.:i~
-'"
r~
~ ~
:;;:;
;,z::~
;/)
:::::: -
~
~?
~ :p
~...:J
~~
:::r
7:i~
Ol~
==::IW
:.,... ~
~ t
:.....l
~
"'co.....
",-o~
,..-- .--y.....
. \ 0
.,.-'"
'-"C"J"--
Z Ql
E~O)
Ql::l"'
~"""'":lD..
"'
'0
C
Ql
0>
<{
(
>-
cr
<(
:E
:E
:J
(f)
..J
<(
u
i=
>-
..J
<(
Z
<(
..J
o
(f)
"..
UJ
..J
CD
<(
f-
I
. EXHIBIT
'?j
c.
~
lr
'"
~
'0
a;
;:
'"
~
~
;
;;
~
c
"
J:
.. - .. >-
j!: :I z
-
-_-_.0 - . -
ill ..
"' ~ . E
:;l ~ l.i S! "
0. ~
N " ,,2 J?, ~ 0
"' .. - ~
e -,-
~ I . ..-
~ " " E -
.. ~ }.. .. ~
" "- .; 5
a ~ z~ S "
~ ...
. -
;:; '" E .. II
r1. "," '" ::!
!1i S "
1-- - I .-
w E .
en ~
i E .. ~
" "
~ I--
.. -0 .. :il
>; . ! ~
>- >. ,;
" -
- ;--
.
~ t~ '"
~
.. E;=i .;
>-
- - .-
>. ~ E
. " ..
z . "- ~ ..
w c 5 ,; ..;
.
~
- - -
.
" " >- ~
~ . .. ~ .
" !?: " '" ;"
. .. d
'" ..
"
'" <> .
~
.. " c I ~
" 0 '5 '"
0 ~ . .s '!! .
. - '"
z '"
E
. .. s
Q, > . .
E . ;2 -- 0
.:I" I J
.. f:
I
..- ~. -_.-. 'ii
" -
"-,, g
Q.~ -' ~
~ >-
"
'"
-1: _... - .
E "
. . '"
. .. ] 8
'"
" .. ~
."
u 'iI
--
g "'
'" >-
.5 @
5 ~
'" 6
'"
Qj
~
z
~
'u
"
u..
'"
,,:>
....
'"
'"
~
'"
w
'"
~
L.
~
W
'J
'"
~
k
~
w
"
Q,
.
~
"
;;
~
.
jj
u
.
F.
~
~
"
:;
c
o
i
.;J
'0
~
F
"
,
w
.
.
-'
J2
~
~
"
,
~
~
3
"
...: ~
.~ S 'i
_~ '.:i ~ ;;;
c "
~ .~ ~ ~
t) ~ .r; $.
~]l~~
;, ~ 1 ~ ~
~ "- &; :f;
V tr t'l>
U) Z ::;. ...:. 2
"'
"
~
:ll
r.
<(
C"
('-I
,
l:
"'co.....
<.90~
",0_
~NO
. .q-~ L1J
ON~
Z <D
E~O)
<D:J'"
~-,D...
'"
'0
C
Q)
Ol
<
>-
0:::
~
~
:i5
:::l
tI)
..J
~
u
!=
>-
..J
~
Z
0:(
0:::
w
t-
o:(
~
Cl
Z
:::l
o
0:::
~
N
W
..J
OJ
0:(
t-
'"
'"
,.,
'"
N
"'
!;>
-
-
...
B
~
.~
u.
-"
o .
....j
- ~
~j
.... ~
><
i
0..
~
"
..
g>
~
~
;::
~
ii;
.::l
oE
...!.. =
~ ~
wj
.!
<5
z. Ql
.J! -a j;:e f'}
~~2N .
N -
E l: ~
.. Q...!:'m <;n
~~gN M
H ~ ~
.
'"
a.
or
....
'"
i!!
"
.
o
.
,
'5
....
.
.
~
"
'"
Q
-1--- -
"
"
8
Q
"
"
" -
on
!2 ~
:J
~ ~
'"
f-
::>
~ ~
Co
f-- -
:J
Co (:1
n
_':1
" ;1
-I
:J
- ~
co
-
z
~
"'
N
g
w
"
~
-
~
;;;
EXHIBIT
-.'-,
1/
~
J _}
<
Uj
"
t',
;:.:J
'"
~
~
'"
w
~
"
o
---
:J
::
-
"
""
~
'-
~::
c.
'~
~- '0
, -
0 Q
k 0>
rn
. 0.
..
>
0
~ ~
~ '0
0. ?
" " g
$! a. ] " .
0 ;'j
0 .:0 n
g . ,., "';oj
" c '0
" c ~ &
~ ~ "
. " ::; g-
o. I T C
2'i .
c ~ ~
, " ~
E , '" .
0 " ;B
< <3 . ~ .
] .... .
;g 'S ~
. is . ~
;; >= CD " '"
,~ .... ,. 0'
. '0 z co w
e-.
OJ "
. 8 ~
.. ~
0 :T " g
! '"
E ~ ;;
~ ~- ~ - -
'" '5. 0
~ E E
. '"
u on c ~
.Q - V>
.. ~ .J ~
u. ti :5
'" ~
~
:;; '" .~
~
" ::; ~~
N
W
Q.
Q.
Q,
Q.
Q.
Q.
Q.
Q.
Q.
Q.
(
1'.
Florida Brownfields Association
baGk Up JJ\o+c,i<,jl
Agenda ItJ'rl\~ol flfc?6
June 24, 2008
Page 16 of 17
Vz-
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Do we have to have known contaminated sites in order to designate a Brownfields
Area?
Can a Brownfields Area be designated without including every site in the defined
area?
Does a Brownfields designation automatically allow for cleanup funds to be accessed
if contamination Is found during assessment?
Does a Brownfields designation protect the owner of a site from future liability when,
through assessments, they learn of existing contamination on the site?
What is the difference between a designated Brownfields Area and a Brownfields
Site?
Do we have to have community approval to designate a Brownfields site or area?
How do we decide whether we want to designate a Brownfields Site or a Brownfields
Area?
How do we go about finding and selecting a Qualified environmental consulting firm?
Where can we get help in developing our grant proposal?
Why is it so important to conduct community outreach programs?
Q. Do we have to have known contaminated sites in order to designate a Brownfields
Area?
A. No. A Brownfields Area does not in any way imply contamination. Brownfields are defined as
abandoned, idled, or under-used commercial properties that may be contaminated or could
merely have the perception of contamination. The environmental status of sites within a
Brownfields Area can only be evaluated by environmental assessments.
Q. Can a Brownfields Area be designated without including every site in the defined
area?
A. Yes. The Brownfields program allows for owners who do not wish their property to be included
as a Brawnfields to 'opt out,' Of course the official description of the Brownfields Area would
have to delineate the boundaries of the excluded area.
Q Does a Brownfields designation automatically allow for cleanup funds to be accessed
. if contamination is found during assessment?
A. No. There are federal cleanup funds available for Brownfield sites, but they have to be applied
for during the regular application cycle as a separate grant proposal. Cleanup grants are very
site specific and among the criteria for obtaining these funds are: the site must be owned by a
municipality or non-profit organization and the applicant shall not have contributed to the
contamination. A minimum of Phase 1 and Phase 2 Environmental Site Assessments must have
been conducted on the site to qualify.
Q Does a Brownfields designation protect the owner of a site from future liability when,
. through assessments, they learn of existing contamination on the site?
A. While the Brownfields program does provide some liability protection related to known impacts
at a site, it does not strictly eliminate liability for site restoration. The owner or purchaser who
qualifies for Brownfields incentives must develop an agreement with the State regulatory
agency to address impacts at the site. Upon execution of a Brownfields Site Rehabilitation
Agreement (8SRA), the owner is afforded liability protection limiting site rehabilitation to the
terms of the BSRA so long as the owner complies with the terms of the BSRA.
Q. What is the difference between a designated Brownfields Area and a Brownfields
Site?
A A designated Brownfields Area may encompass one or many Brownflelds Sites and is done so
. through the passing of a resolution by the local government. The Area designation process
includes community notification along with the local municipality approval process that may be
http://www.floridabrownfields.orglResourcesIFAQs.htm
6/] 2/2008
Florida Brownfields Association
V \
\~, l/tf,
) \-
I
'i '.
"~'U'o...\..
,'_r ..")
- I ..-
Agenda Itf~J. m&
June 24, 2008
Page 17 of 17
accomplished in a period of weeks to months. Within a designated Area, any individual site has
the ability to access certain Brownfields incentives (e.g., the job creation bonus program)
without the cumbersome separate qualification process. To access the full suite of Brownfields
incentives (including the Voluntary Cleanup Tax Credit or VCTC), a site owner must designate
the individual Brownfields site. The Brownfields site designation process typically involves
meeting limited qualifications and may include the execution of a BSRA.
Q. Do we have to have community approval to designate a Brownfields site or area?
A In order to designate a Brownfield site or area, public notices of a pending resolution must be
. presented to the community for their comments. Thereafter, the resolution must be approved
by the community's elected officials.
Q. How do we decide whether we want to designate a Brownfields Site or a Brownfields
Area?
A It depends on the project you have in mind. Most communities recognize several sites within
. specific areas that would benefit from a Brownflelds designation. They have found it much more
convenient to designate a 'Brownfields Area' and later qualify any number of sites, individually,
within the Brownfields Area for assessment activity. The designation process for individual sites
one at a time is very time consuming and can more easily be accomplished through designating
an area that includes all the sites of concern. However, if the community anticipates only one
site for redevelopment, designating the one site might be the direction to follow. If the site is
an extraordinarily large site, it would make more sense to just designate that site and follow
through with cleanup activity on the same site.
Q. How do we go about finding and selecting a qualified environmental consulting firm?
A. Among the membership of the Florida Brownfields Association (FBA) there are many qualified
environmental consulting fIrms. While the organization cannot specifically recommend one
consultant over another, we can provide the names of those who are members of the FBA and
allow you to make your own choice. The State of Florida has a Statute known as the
Consultant's Competitive Negotiations Act (CCNA), Section 287.055, which defines a Request
For Qualifications (RFQ) process by which a consultant or consultants can be chosen for your
projects.
Q. Where can we get help in developing our grant proposal?
A The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) has a guidance booklet on their website
. that details the crltena for submitting proposals for Brownfields grant funds. Most of the
communities and organizations throughout the state of Florida that have written successful
USEPA grant proposals maintain membership with the FBA. Anyone of them, as well as various
consultants, would be happy to assist you in writing your proposal.
Q. Why is it so important to conduct community outreach programs?
A. Any a~tivities that have an impact on the community should be brought to the community's
attention before they are enacted. Even though the Brownflelds program has been around for
ten years, many people still do not understand what it is and what it does. The more informed
the public is, the easier it is to accomplish the established goals. Community outreach serves to
make everyone aware, get them involved, and on the same team. In addition, if you plan to
apply for federal Brownflelds funds, among the primary criteria for qualification for funding is
public notice and community involvement.
http://www . floridahrownfields.org/ResourcesIF A Qs.htrn
6112/2008