Resolution 2001-045
r 8~, 1
RESOLUTION NO. 2001- 45
A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN INTERCHANGE MASTER
PLAN FOR LANDS WITHIN ACTIVITY CENTER #9 AS SET
FORTH IN THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT AND FUTURE
LAND USE MAP AND MAP SERIES OF COLLIER COUNTY'S
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN.
WHEREAS, Collier County, pursuant to Section 163.3161, et.sea., Florida Statutes, the
Florida Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act, was
required to prepare and adopt a comprehensive plan; and
WHEREAS, the Collier County Board of County Commissioners adopted the Collier County
Growth Management Plan on January 10, 1989; and
WHEREAS, the Future land Use Element, Section I.B.2 requires the development of an
Interchange Master Plan for Activity Center #9 as contained in Exhibit A; and
WHEREAS, Activity Center #9 contains lands generally located at State Road 84, Interstate
75 and Collier Boulevard as shown on Exhibit A; and
WHEREAS, Collier County has prepared the Interchange Master Plan in accordance with the
Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan as contained in Exhibit B; and
WHEREAS, the Interchange Master Plan establishes landscape, sign age, and architectural
design concepts for lands within Activity Center #9; and
WHEREAS, the Interchange Master Plan also provides transportation! land use strategies and
conceptual transportation system improvements, including an updated Access Management Plan for
lands within Activity Center #9; and
WHEREAS, the Interchange Master Plan will be implemented through a zoning overlay and
other amendments to the Collier County Land Development Code for private lands within Activity
Center #9; and
WHEREAS, the proposed entry and exit gateway features in the public rights-of-way, including
landscaping, directional signage, and lighting elements shall be prioritized in Collier County's Capital
Improvement Plan of the Capital Improvement Element of the Growth Management Plan.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that;
SECTION ONE: APPROVAL OF INTERCHANGE MASTER PLAN.
The Board of County Commissioners hereby approves the Interchange Master Plan for
Activity Center #9 attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated by reference herein.
/3 "e-
THIS RESOLUTION ADOPTED after motion; seconded and majority vote this __
day
of '::-e.e p Ill+~ 'j
,2001.
'.
8A
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER
Chairman"ames D. Ca~'l:er~''''''~ - '''~ r-~, ph.D.
2_. -/3 -~s I
~SA 1
Activity Center
Plan
Final
pared for:
Collier County Government
November 2000
Prepared by:
WilsOnMiller
Activity Center #9 Interchange Master Plan
Appendix A
Appendix B
1 Introduction
2 Vision Statement
3 Design Deveh)pment
4 Land Use & Transportation
5 Implementation Strategies
FSUTMS Model Ph)ts
Signalized Intersection Analyses
Arterial Analyses
Pr4,~:ct l~_'adcrsl~ip
Board .f COUlll5 Comnlissiont:rs
'Ftmoth3 J. (~OllStgtfltitlc, Chairman
James D. Carter, Ph.D., Vice Chairman
Bari)ara B. Jlerr)
Daxid Brandl
C.Ilicr (~OUlll; Staff Review Ii?am
R.n Nino, AICP, ¢:urrcm l)bnni~u2
Ra~ Bcllox~s. Alt;P, Current Phmnine
[rcm' q~morlin~ki, AIA, C,,mp~hcnsh c P~nnina
l)a~d ~ t',-l,s, AICR (],,nprchcnsixc lqanni~
:Xm~ la~ t,,r, AICR (:,m~prchcnsix~: Plannin~
~4n 14[sin~cr, AICR C.mprcht. nsixc Pt.mninff
Pro|~urt~ ()xsnt'rs anti
Jim I(.ath, lolla.ttc I'l 1), Supcrx Nlotcl
D~x~ht NildittJt'~lll, Rt'J)a'SC[llitllxt
Don Pick~orth. Rcprcscnlati&t,
Pa~ Pa pinta u, ]ol~atc P I D
Roi)crt Dnane, ReprcscntatK~c
Bruce Andc~ m, Rcprcscntathc
Art Lcnn.x, Mobil Gas
Stcxc Millcg .~m~ Gas Station
Cad~5 Dail3, MtDonalds
Mau I.,fiacan.. ~ hire l~kc
NlarEalc~ l~mblid~c, (;olden Gate Commerce Park
R~,bert %mith, A lli~at*~t AIIcp
lsnda Nlar~zalk,~sxski. Industrial Zonctl
Br~an Milk, ]{cprcscn~alixc
(a,'~ lJlack. Crac~'r ltarrcl
\'( il',onNlJllc,', Int.
Anit,t I.. Jctlkins. AI(:R l'r,,icct Plafmine
Jct'J,r3 I.. Pcri'5, AICI~ l'ra~sportat~on Plannin~
KathcrixJt (]lhichclc, JJr,jtcl l)csi~n
Bill Ih~crs, Pr.i,., ~ [)csl~n
Robin Rcnli,~. RI.A. Pr, qct ~ l)rsien
Introduction
2reVision Statement
3 Design Development
4--Land Use & Transportation
5 ...... Implementation Strategies
Appendix A--FSUTMS Model Plots
APpendix B :Signalized Intersection Analyses
Arterial Analyses
Wils . nMiller
Section I Introduction
BACKGROUND
In the past decade, Collier County has
placed greater emphasis on improving its
aesthetic appearance. In 1996, the Board
of County Commissioners (BCC) adopted
architectural guidelines that require all
commercial development to build to
higher standards that represent the
quality of the community.
During the 1997 Evaluation Appraisal
Report (EAR) Growth Management Plan
(GMP) amendments, the BCC adopted an
amendment that will further the efforts to
improve the appearance of Collier County.
The County expects to achieve this by
developing an Interchange Master Plan
(IMP) that will create a "gateway" into the
greater Naples area at Activity Center #9,
which is located at the intersection of 1-75
and Collier Boulevard.
The GMP amendment specifically says:
"The IMP is intended to create an
enhanced "gateway"to Naples. The IMP
process shall be initiated by the property
owners and/or their representatives by
meeting with the County planning staff
within 60 days of the adoption of this
Growth Management Plan amendment
and a finding of compliance from the
Department of Community Affairs. The
purpose of the meeting will be to establish
a mutually acceptable vision statement for
Activity Center #9. The Interchange
Master Plan shall be adopted by
Resolution by the Board of County
Commissioners, All rezones thereafter
shall meet the intent of the vision
statement.
Subsequent to the development of the
vision statement, new projects within
Activity Center #9 are encouraged to have
a unified plan of development in the form
of a Planned Unit Development. The
mixture of uses allowed in Interchange
Activity Center #9 shall include the full
array of commercial uses; residential and
non-residential uses; institutional uses;
Actiwty Center#9 Interchange Master Plan (iMP)
Business Park; hotel/motel uses at a
density consistent with the Land
Development Code; industrial uses in the
northeast, southwest and southeast
quadrants. The mix and intensity of land
uses shall meet the intent of the vision
statement and be defined during the
rezoning process. The entire Interchange
Activity Center is eligible for up to 100% of
the entire acreage to be developed for and
of the uses referenced above, except the
maximum amount of commercial acreage
shall not exceed 55% of the total acreage
(632.5 ac.) of Interchange Activity Center
#9. The factors to consider during review of
a rezone petition shall be compliance with
the vision statement and those included in
the Mixed Use Activity Center."
STUDY PARAMETERS
Subsequent to adopting the Activity
Center #9 GMP amendment, the BCC
established the study parameters for the
IMR The components required in the IMP
include the following:
* Land Use amount, type, and
location of land uses
· Transportation and Access---traffic
generation volume and
characteristics of uses; shared
access; frontage roads; restricted, or
prohibited access
· Landscaping/Buffers~requirements
for unified landscape theme to
enhance the "gateway" image
· Signage--development of unified
signage plan for the interchange
· Architecture specific architectural
standards for buildings
· Map(s)---access features/restrictions/
requirements: possible locations of
shared access, frontage or reverse
frontage roads, bypass roads;
location of required buffer areas;
other components listed above as
may be appropriate
WilspnMiller
Novernber 2000 Sectton 1, Page
Section l---Introduction
,SA1
The BCC also established that the IMP
provisions shall apply to properties that
are zoned but undeveloped. Provisions
shall be implemented in the Land
Development Code (LDC) as a zoning
overlay.
STUDY PURPOSE
The purpose of the IMP is to develop
landscape, signage, and architectural
design concepts that will create an
enhanced gateway into Collier County. In
addition, the IMP is also intended to
develop transportation/land use strategies
and conceptual transportation system
improvements, including an updated
Access Management Plan for lands within
Activity Center #9. Figure 1-1 presents the
IMP study area.
Opportunities and Constraints
As presented in Figure 1-2 on the
following page, design opportunities and
constraints were identified throughout
Activity Center #9. The opportunities
represent the existing conditions that will
afford the greatest possibilities to achieve
the defined objectives. The constraints are
those existing conditions that may hinder
the ability to achieve the defined
objectives.
The general design opportunities for the
Activity Center #9 are as follows:
* The exit #15 interchange offers
landscaping opportunities
. Existing right-of-way can
accommodate design elements and
pedestrian activity
* Lakes and natural preserves create
pleasant vistas for motorists
* The area has adequate undeveloped
property that will comply with the IMP
* The existing hotels and restaurants
create an active environment
The general overall constraints for the
Activity Center #9 are as follows:
* Existing and approved developments
may impede a cohesive design
concept in certain locations
* Multilane roadways and busy
intersections complicate pedestrian
movement
ACTIVITY CENTER #9
[ ,F~ig~ure 1-1
Achvlty Center #9 Interchange Master Plan (IMP)
NovernOer 2000 Section 1, Page 2
WilsOnMiller
Section I--Introduction
FutureTransportation
Improvements
Additional opportunities and constraints
will be realized with the construction of
future transportation improvements within
Activity Center #9.
The SR-84 Corridor Study recently
completed for the FDOT recommended
improving SR-84 to a multilane
configuration along the existing alignment
instead of realigning the corridor eastward
to intersect with CR-951 one mile south of
the current intersection. During the course
of the study, it was determined that
regardless of the alignment, the existing
SR-84/CR-951 intersection would have to
be grade separated due to the significant
influence (and vicinity) of the 1-75
interchange coupled with the activity center
development. Widening along the existing
alignment was found to be more cost-
effective and have fewer environmental
impacts. A Preliminary Development and
Environmental (PD&E) study is underway to
determine the appropriate grade separation
concept for the intersection. As a result of
what likely is to be a staging of
improvements (first a multilaning of SR-84
followed by a grade separation
improvement), special access management
considerations will be needed.
The Access Management Plan
recommended in Section 4--Land Use &
Transportation will need to be updated in
accordance with future roadway
improvements, specifically the grade
separation improvements.
Activity Center #9 Interchange Master Plan (IMP)
WilspnMiller
November2000 Section 1, Page 4
I Introduction
2---Vision State~nent
4---Land Use & Transportation
5---Implementation
dix A
n Analyses
Section 2--Vision Statement
18Ali
DEVELOPING THE VISION
On July 11, 2000 a visioning meeting
was conducted for the individuals who
own property within the boundaries of
Activity Center #9. During that meeting,
the participating property owners and/or
their representatives came to a
consensus on a Vision Statement. This
Vision Statement sets forth the goals of
the implementation process, land use, the
transportation system, and design
elements. The BCC endorsed the Vision
Statement at its August 1, 2000 meeting.
Vision Statement
Activity Center #9 will be a "Gateway" into
Collier County. It will be a destination for
res/dents, and the traveler's choice place to
stop along 1-75 and Collier Boulevard. Both
residents and travelers will be able to
appreciate the essential quality of Collier
County in this 633-acre Activity Center.
employment centers, retail and service
commemial, hotel/motel, community
facilities, and residential development. A
maximum of 55 percent of the total
acreage may be devoted to retail
commercial land uses.
Transportation System/Access
Primary access shall be provided by
access roads generally controlled by
traffic signals at arterial intersections.
Direct access from development sites to
the arterial road network shall be
restricted to minor secondary
connections.
Each quadrant of the activity center
shaft provide for internal interconnections
between adjacent land uses. This will
facilitate convenient and safe internal
vehicular and pedestrian movements
without affecting the external roadway
network. In addition, Activity Center #9 will
support future transit stops.
Implementation
Aft rezones within Activity Center #9
shaft be consistent with this Vision
Statement. An IMP shaft be developed to
further define the intent of this Vision
Statement, and shaft be adopted by the
BCC by resolution. Subsequent to the
adoption of the IMP, an Activity Center #9
zoning overlay district shaft be adopted in
the Land Development Code.
Land Use
Activity Center #9 shall be developed
with a mix of uses that will serve residents
and travelers. The mix of land uses shall
be designed to complement the intensity
of the intersection while providing the
appropriate transitions to the nearby
residential communities. Land uses shall
be located in a manner that will enhance
the overall appearance and function of the
activity center.
Land uses may include a mixture of
office/business centers, light industrial
The Design Elements
Collier County has many exemplary
characteristics--it is known for its
beaches, golf courses, and the
Everglades. Residents enjoy the
opportunity to live, work, and play in
beautiful rural areas and vibrant urban
settings. Activity Center #9 is located on
the urban edge of Collier County;
therefore, emphasis will be placed on
complementary design themes that reflect
the influences such as the Everglades,
rural areas, and Old Florida. Properties
within Activity Center #9 shall be
developed or redeveloped in accordance
with one or more of the design themes
defined in the IMP. The design themes
shall be incorporated into the landscape,
architecture, signage, gateway features,
and roadway lighting design.
Figure 2-1 iljustrates how all of these
themes of the vision statement may be
incorporated into Activity Center #9's
future design.
WilspnMiller
Activity Center #9 Interchange Master Plan (iMP)
November2000 Section 2, Page 1
I--Introduction
2--Vision Statement
1--Design Devel0pment i~ ~:?~ 1. ~ ~
4--Land Use & Transportation
dix I F MS'~Model
~n Analyses
Section 2
Design Development
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
The design of Activity Center #9 is
defined using character themes that shall
be represented through these elements:
· Architecture and signage
· Landscape buffers
· Boundary gateways
· Arterial roadway elements
Architecture and Signage
As stated in the Vision Statement, three
complementary character themes shall be
used in the architecture and signage
elements throughout Activity Center #9.
The three character themes include the
following:
· Everglades
· Rural
· Old Florida
The Everglades Character
In the Everglades, architectural
structures typically feature function first--
aesthetics are secondary. Designs in the
Everglades reflect a pioneering spirit
conveyed through neutral colors with
minimum detailing of building facades.
Simple roof lines, deep overhangs,
porches (where feasible), and clerestory
windows are some of the major
architectural elements that shall define the
Everglades Character theme. Figure 3-1
iljustrates elements represented in the
Everglades Character.
Architectural structures shall exhibit
colors that support the Everglades theme.
As shown in Figure 3-2, muted tones
found in the Everglades accented by light
values of the same color are desirable.
Figure 3-2: Everglades Color
Figure 3-1: Everglades Character
Activity Center 119 Interchange Master Plan (IMP)
November2000 Section 3. Page 1
WilsOnMiller
Section 3 Design Development
8A 1
Rural
The Rural Character
Architecture in rural Collier County
comprises minimum adornments,
symmetrical facades, and a
combination of roof types with a fair
degree of articulation. Wood detailing,
cupolas, and dormers are some of the
major architectural elements that shall
define the Rural Character theme.
Figure 3-3 iljustrates elements
represented in the
Rural Character.
Architectural
structures shall
exhibit
;.
colors that
support the
Rural Florida
theme. As
shown in
Figure 3-4,
soft, natural
earth tones with
contrasting deep
hue accents are
desirable.
Figure 3-4: Rural Colors
Old Florida Character
Old Florida architecture is
unpretentious and inviting.
It is beautifully adapted to
its climate and quietly
enhanced. Old Florida is a
synthesis of many
vernacular traditions
ranging from the Victorian
to those of Cracker and
antebellum South. Peaked
tin roofs, deep roof
overhangs, generous
porches, and ample
windows are some of the
traditional vernacular
features of the Old Florida theme. Figure
3-5 iljustrates elements represented in the
Old Florida Character.
'2haracter
Architectural structures shall exhibit
colors to support the Old Florida theme.
As shown in Figure 3-6, light or white trim
colors coupled with soft, pastel tones are
desirable.
Figure 3-6: Old Florida Colors
Ac,iv#y Oenter intercha ge Mas,er Pian WilspnMiller
No vember 2000 Section 3, Page 2
Section 3 Design Development
Landscape Buffers
Two landscape buffei requirements shall
apply to Activity Center #9:
* Buffers adjacent to major arterial
roadways
* Buffers not adjacent to arterial
roadways
Adjacent Buffers
Landscape buffers adjacent to arterial
roadways shall include formal plantings to
create a feeling of familiarity and
continuity for the visitor in Activity Center
#9. Primary landscape elements shall be
chosen to reduce the scale of the
adjacent roadway and commercial
structures and to provide pedestrian
comfort. Secondary landscape elements
shall include formal, orderly planting beds
with highly defined edges. Subtropical
trees and plants in layered arrangements
will provide visitors with a well-planned
garden experience.
Nonadjacent Buffers
Landscape buffers that are not adjacent
to arterial roadways shall be consistent
with the established character themes by ·
using relaxed rhythms in planting areas.
This will create a soft, natural effect that
transitions from the formal pedestrian and
vehicular paths. Native palms, grasses,
and stands of hardwood trees with a
natural progression of undergrowth shall
comprise the major landscape elements
within buffers.
The landscaping plant palette selected
for Activity Center #9 includes, but is not
limited to, the following:
Trees
. Southern
· Magnolia
* Live Oak
* Red Maple
* Slash Pine
* Dahoon Holly
Bald Cypress
White Geiger
South Florida
Slash Pine
Pa/ms
· Cabbage Palm
* Paurotis Palm
· Washington
Palm
Accents
· Cardboard
Zamia
Shrubs
· Leather Fern
* Marlberry
* Myrsine
· Walters
Viburnum
* Sweet
Viburnum
* Indian
Hawthorn
* Florida Privet
· Saw Palmetto
· Fakahatchee
* Shillings Holly
8A
November2000 Section 3~ Page 3
Section 3--Design Development
8Al
· Necklace Pod
· Thryallis
· Dwarf
Fakahatchee
· Sandankwa
Viburnum
Aquatic Plants
· Leather Fern
· Yellow Canna
Vines
· Bougainvillea
· Confederate
Jasmine
Annuals
· Egyptian Star
Flower
Ground Covers
· Pink Muhly
Grass
· Swordfern
· Sand
Cordgrass
Boundary Gateway Featu res
Boundary gateway features shall define
the entry/exit points of Activity Center #9.
They shall be located within the right-of-
way at the north and south boundaries on
Collier Boulevard and at the west
boundary on Davis Boulevard.
A major gateway feature at the
intersection of Collier Boulevard and 1-75
shall introduce Activity Center #9 to
motorists on 1-75 by providing the
following:
· Directional signs/monumentation that
are architectural in nature
· Intensified plantings that introduce
color, massing, and layering
· Areas for display of local sculpture/
art elements that are intended for
public display and enjoyment
Each gateway feature shall be designed
to complement the character themes,
which will help define and implement
Activity Center #9's Vision Statement.
Figure 3-7 presents a conceptual design
for a boundary gateway.
Boundary Gateway ~oncept
Activity Center ,¢9 Interchange Master Plan (IMP)
November2000 Section 3, Page 4
Wils nMiller
Section 3--Design Development
Arterial Roadway
Landscaping
As iljustrated in Figure 3-8 on the
following page, arterial roadways shall
include the following:
· Sidewalks along all arterials to
promote pedestrian activity and to
interconnect adjacent commercial
buildings
· Street trees for shade, appropriate
scale, and to separate pedestrians
from motorists
· Intersections that have pigmented
crosswalks and colorful plantings to
aid in motorist and pedestrian
recognition
· Median plantings for contrast with
formal street trees through cjustering
and layering
· Median plantings should have view
corridors to commercial buildings;
appropriate view triangles shall be
maintained at intersections
Lighting and Directional Signage
Special lighting fixtures shall be used
along Activity Center #9's arterial
roadways. The selected light fixture style
shall complement all of the selected
character themes.
All directional signage within Activity
Center #9 shall be unified and designed in
a manner that is complementary to the
selected character themes.
November2000 Section 3, Page 5
Introduction
2---Vision State~ient
3 Design
Development~.'.~-~~, ~
4=-Land Use & Transportation
5 Implement on Stra ~ s .
Plots:
Analyses
~, ,.
ST
---1
0
CANAL
h
Section 4iLand Use & Transportation
8A1
LAND USE
The BCC adopted a study parameter to
develop a land use plan that identifies the
type and amount of land uses. As
demonstrated in Figure 4-1, the IMP
accomplishes this by developing an IMP
Land Use Map that recognizes the
existing zoning. It is guided by the study
parameters and objectives. The IMP Land
Use Map is not intended to be used as a
zoning map, but rather as a general
indicator of desirable future land use
relationships.
The Activity Center #9 GMP amendment
defined the following:
"The uses allowed in Interchange
Activity Center #9 shall include the full
array of commercial uses; residential and
non-residential uses; institutional uses;
Business Park with Activity Center #9;
hotel/motel uses at a density consistent
w/th the Land Development Code;
industrial uses in the northeast, southwest
and southeast quadrants. The entire
Interchange Activity Center is eligible for
up to 100% of the entire acreage to be
developed for and of the uses referenced,
except the maximum amount of
commercial acreage shall not exceed 55%
of the total acreage (632.5 ac.)."
The location and configuration of the
following four proposed land use
designations with Activity Center #9 are
delineated on the IMP Land Use Map:
· Commercial--60 acres
· Industrial--139 acres
· Mixed-use Commercial--223 acres
· Mixed-use Industrial--218 acres
The following describes each land use
designation including purpose, permitted
uses, and intensity/density.
Commercial
This designation is intended to
accommodate the full array of commercial
uses as allowed in each commercial
Actiwty Center #9 Interchange Master Plan (IMP)
zoning district in the LDC, institutional
uses, office, and hotel/motel uses at a
density consistent with the LDC.
Industrial
This designation is reserved primarily
for industrial type uses. Intensities of use
shall be consistent with the GMP Industrial
District.
Mixed-use Commercial
This designation is intended to
accommodate a mix of commercial, office,
and residential uses within the activity
center. Land areas appropriate for this
designation include retail, office, service,
and residential. Residential density is
allowed consistent with the GMP Density
Rating System. Hotel/motel uses are
allowed at a density consistent with the
LDC.
Mixed-use Industrial
This designation is intended to identify
the land areas appropriate for light
industrial, retail, office, service, and
residential. Intensities of industrial uses
shall be consistent with the GMP Urban-
Industrial District. The full array of
commercial uses are allowed consistent
with the commercial zoning districts in the
LDC. Hotel/motel uses are allowed at a
density consistent with the LDC.
Residential density is allowed consistent
with the GMP--Density Rating System.
TRANSPORTATION
EVALUATION
Overview
The transportation evaluation process
included an evaluation of the travel
demand model simulation and other non-
modeling transportation assessment
results. The process identified and
WilsOnMiller
November2000 Sectton 4. Page 1
8A1
Z
m~m
~Z
Section 4--Land Use & Transportation
'8A 1
quantified problems/problem areas found
in the evaluation. The transportation
evaluation was used to assess a variety of
improvements that may be recommended
for consideration as part of the IMR
Certain previously identified future
improvements to the transportation
network were assumed, including ramp
improvements to the 1-75 interchange and
the construction of a grade separation at
the SR-84 and CR-951 intersection.
Appropriate performance measures and
evaluation criteria (eg., LOS, delay,
volume to capacity ratio, etc.) were used
to evaluate the future conditions.
The transportation evaluation process
also identified and evaluated potential
transportation/land use strategies and
infrastructure improvements that address
system problems/problem areas. It
considered strategies such as non-capital
operational improvements, transportation
demand management (TDM), and other
land use/site-related techniques that may
be applicable to the activity center
concept.
A variety of potential transportation and
land use strategies and infrastructure
improvements were tested. The results
were evaluated against the established
criteria. Performance measures and
evaluation criteria results for potential
strategies and improvements were
compared against those of the base
condition. Transportation infrastructure
improvements that were considered
included (but were not be limited to)
access management improvements,
intersection modifications, additional or
modified freeway ramps, additional
through-lanes, grade-separated
intersection improvements, new road
segments, etc. Close cooperation with
state and local implementing
transportation agencies ensured
coordination in developing and analyzing
potential strategies and improvements.
Assumptions
For the purposes of the future
conditions analysis (FCA), a single land
use data set for a buildout scenario was
used to generate system traffic in and
around Activity Center #9. The land use
data set developed by the County/
Metropolitan Planning Organization
(MPO) for use in the "density reduction"
buildout assessments was used. Although
the study horizon year was undetermined,
the analysis year data set was assumed
to represent the area's buildout.
The traffic analysis zones (TAZs) within
the study area were reviewed and
evaluated for consistency with the
proposed development potential of lands
included within Activity Center #9. A
consensus on the appropriate land use
variables (eg., number of dwelling units,
number of employees, etc.) to be included
in the study data set was achieved before
any transportation alternatives
assessment began.
With regard to future land use
improvements, several projects within the
area (but not within the activity center
boundary) that may impact the
transportation system within the activity
center were identified and considered in
the analysis, either directly as part of the
modeling effort or indirectly through
observations.
A number of initial assumptions were
made based on approved plans and
programs: the capacity improvements
recognized in Collier County's
Transportation Element of the GMP; the
MPO's 2020 Long-Range Transportation
Plan, including the 2020 Needs
Assessment; and the recently completed
SR-84 Corridor Study, which made
specific recommendations about future
improvements at the intersection of SR-84
and CR-951.
Activity Center#9 Interchange Master ¢tan (IMP)
WilsOnMiller
November2000 Section 4, Page 3
Section 4---Land Use & Transportation
8Al
Base (Current) Operating
Conditions
The major transportation system
components within Activity Center #9
include 1-75, CR-951, and SR-84.
Currently, the area is not served by public
transportation, except for the occasional
taxi cab and demand-response vehicles
that may serve employers in the area.
Tables 4-1a and 4-1b present the 1998
operational conditions of the major
roadways and signalized intersections.
The northern quadrants, which are
substantially vacant of immediately
adjacent land uses, are separated by CR-
951, a four-lane divided highway. This
area is served by existing and future east/
west "access" roads located immediately
outside the "limited access" (LA)
boundaries of 1-75 (immediately north of
the ramps). Additionally, a planned access
point approximately 900 feet north of the
existing access roads will provide
signalized access control for future major
developments east and west of CR-951.
To allow all developments within the
4 D 46,300 33,075 B (0.71)
4 D 46,300 33,075 B (0.71)
4 D 44,300 23,739 C (0.54)
2 D 10,800 15,790 F (1.46)
Table 4- la
Existing Geometric Conditions Problems/
Problem Areas
The interchange activity center will be
populated by multiuse developments in all
four quadrants. The problems/problem
areas associated with
transportation impacts, and
most acutely, those issues
dealing with access on the
north side of the interstate
corridor, are profoundly
different from those issues
on the south side.
The major transportation
links that serve Activity
Center #9 include 1-75 (via
Looking southeast across Activity Center I/9. exit #15), Collier Boulevard
(CR-951), and Davis
Boulevard (SR-84). The existing roadway
lane geometry in Activity Center #9 is
depicted in Figure 4-2 on the following
page.
O C
C F
E
Table 4- lb
northwest quadrant to access the future
northern signalized access point, an
interconnection is planned on the west
side of CR-951. A similar, more circuitous
connection is defined in planning
documents approved for developments on
the east side of CR-951.
Current (base condition) problems are
concentrated at the existing unsignalized
access point. These problems are
primarily associated with high volumes of
truck traffic using the access road to
reach the Collier County Water Treatment
Plant and the Collier County Landfill. White
Lake, a major industrial development, has
Activity Center #9 Interchange Master Plan (iMP)
November2000 Section 4, Page 4
WiispnMiller
Section 4--Land Use & Transportation
Figure 4-2: Roadway Lane Geometry
begun to attract land uses that will
increase the intersection's traffic. A
secondary problem is the access road's
lack of adequate throat distance at the
intersection with CR-951.
Problems associated with the northern
quadrants are summarized in Table 4-2.
South of the 1o75 corridor, land uses
are being developed with projects east
and west of CR-951 at approximately
20-30 percent buildout. Gas station,
restaurant, and hotel/motel facilities
occupy the southwest and southeast
quadrants of the interchange. The
problem area south of the 1-75 corridor is
the intersection of SR-84 and CR-951,
located approximately 1,400 feet
south of the 1-75 ramps. The LA
limits extend to the SR-84
intersection. Therefore, all
access to commercial
development must
pass through the
SR-84/CR-
951
intersection.
Heavy southbound and
northbound volumes between the
1-75 ramps and SR-84 coupled
with high turning volumes to/from
SRo84 contribute to severe congestion
and long delays, especially during the
morning and evening peak hours. SR-84
west of CR-951 is currently two lanes with
left turn lanes. CR-951 is a four-lane
divided highway. East of CR-951, "Old SR-
84" is a two-lane roadway serving land
development. It terminates east of the
activity center boundary. With the
exception of the delay at CFI-951, no
traffic problems were identified for "Old
SR-84" east of CR-951.
It should be noted that a recently
approved 1-75 interchange at Golden
Gate Parkway scheduled for construction
May be too close to 1-75 ramps to be signalized
Inadequate throat distance
Heavy truck movements to/from Access Road #1
Planned interconnect/on to future northern access (on east side of CR-951) is not direct and
dependent upon others
No currently available interconnect/on to future northern access (on east side of CR-951)
Table 4-2
Activity Center #9 Interchange Master f~lan (IMP) WilsOnMiller
November 2000 Section 4, Page 5
Section 4--Land Use & Transportation
in 2004 may reduce the traffic bound for 1-
75 at this intersection. However,
congestion will continue due to access to
the land development activities competing
with the projected increases in through-
volumes that CR-951 will carry.
Table 4-3 summarizes the problems
associated with the southern quadrants.
development. Widening along the existing
alignment was found to be more cost-
effective and have fewer environmental
impacts. A Preliminary Development and
Environmental (PD&E) study is underway to
determine the appropriate grade separation
concept for the intersection. As a result of
what likely is to be a staging of
improvements (first a multilaning of SR-84
Too close to 1-75 ramps
Inadequate distances from intersection to driveways on SR-84 (west of CR-951)
Inadequate PJW for additional turn lanes (eastbound approach)
Excessive delays due to heavy east to north, south to west and north to west turning
movements
Heavy peak hour traffic volumes
Over capacity in its current 2-lane configuration (LOS "F")
Table 4-3
Potential Infrastructure
Improvements
A number of key system improvements
have been identified previously and are
either approved or being evaluated. As
stated earlier, the future (2004)
interchange at Golden Gate Parkway
should provide an alternative for 1-75-
bound traffic, thereby reducing some of
the traffic that traverses the SR-84/CR-
951 intersection to access the interstate.
The SR-84 Corridor Study recently
completed for the FDOT recommended
improving SR-84 to a multilane
configuration along the existing alignment
instead of realigning the corridor eastward
to intersect with CR-951 one mile south of
the current intersection. During the course
of the study, it was determined that
regardless of the alignment, the existing
SR-84/CR-951 intersection would have to
be grade separated due to the significant
influence (and vicinity) of the 1-75
interchange coupled with the activity center
Activity Center #9 Interchange Master Plan lIMP)
followed by a grade separation
improvement), special access management
considerations' will be needed.
Although currently not planned to be
extended west, future Access Road #2,
north of 1-75, was tested and evaluated as
a connection between CR-951 and Santa
Barbara Blvd.
Table 4-4 summarizes the major
roadway improvements that the Collier
County MPO identified as necessary by
2024 within the activity center boundary.
Table 4-5 identifies additional relatively
Iow-cost infrastructure enhancements and
operational improvements as potential of
transportation system management
(TSM) strategies.
Potential Land Use Strategies
Most of the lands within Activity Center
#9 are zoned for a nonagricultural land
use. The remaining A-Agriculture parcels
likely will be rezoned in the future.
WiisOnMiller
November 2000 Section 4, Page 6
Section 4--Land Use & Transportation
8A 1
Widen from 4 to 6-lanes
Widen from 4 to 8-lanes
Widen from 4 to 6-lanes
Grade Separation & signal modifications
Widen from 2 to 4-lanes
Improved traffic flow; reduced delay; improved LOS
Improved traffic flow; reduced delay; improved LOS
improved traffic flow; reduced delay; improved LOS
Reduced congestion dudng peak periods;
Improved traffic flow; reduced delay; improved LOS
Improved traffic flow; reduced delay; improved LOS
Table 4-4
Enhanced computer controlled traffic
signal system; additional coordination
Additional turn lanes
Vadable Message Boards; in-vehicle
information systems; advanced warning
systems
Quick response traffic control; motodst
aid services; accident investigation
areas; agency awareness; traffic signal
preemption
Non-Peak hours of Construction;
minimization of lane closures; advanced
traveler information
Park-n-Ride Facilities; transit stations
Improved traffic flow; reduced delay; improved
LOS
Improved traffic flow; reduced delay; improved
LOS
Reduces delay; allow travel plan adjustments
Reduced congestion due to incidents; improves
response time to accidents; improves system
recovery time
Reduces delay; allow travel plan adjustments;
improves work-zone safety
Reduced SOV usage; reduced congestion during
peak periods
Table 4-5
Collier County will have an opportunity to
ensure that the development that follows
the adoption of the IMP is planned and
coordinated to be consistent with the Plan
and subsequent LDC amendments. A
variety of land use strategies that may be
considered are discussed below.
Due to the area's currently undeveloped
land, significant opportunities exist to
manage the appropriate development of
much of the area north of the 1-75
corridor. Although generally identified for
commercial or industrial uses such as
retail, office (corporate and general), and
warehousing and distribution centers,
lands within the activity center are suitable
Actiw'ty Center #9 Interchange Master Plan (IMP)
for a mix of uses, including multifamily
residential and institutional and support
services, such as adult congregate living
facilities, medical facilities, churches, and
child care facilities. Mixed-use
developments can significantly reduce the
traffic impacts of land development within
the activity center by providing varying
peak periods of travel and by providing
opportunities to minimize travel through
maximizing "chained" or multipurpose
trips. Residents in these developments
are often able to shop for groceries, pick-
up/drop-off dry cleaning, conduct personal
banking, and pick up the kids--all without
having to use the adjacent highway
system.
WilspnMiller
Nover~ber 2000 Sect/on 4, Page 7
Section 4--Land Use & Transportation
8Al
The value of varied peak hour travel
demand of a mixed-use development
should not be overlooked. Approximately
60-90 percent of the activity center's
"congestion" is generally concentrated
during the 2-3 peak hours during the
morning/evening. In all but the most
severely over-congested facilities, traffic
during the remaining times of the day (the
non-peak hours) is manageable. Historically
(and currently), facilities are built to handle
peak demands. Adopted LOS standards are
based on the measure of congestion during
the peak hour of the day.
In addition to the infrastructure
improvements that are needed as
congestion increases, "gentler"
approaches that involve travel behavior or
TDM can effectively reduce peak hour
demand and congestion.
The TDM strategies in Table 4-6 should
be considered where appropriate.
Future Conditions
The Future Conditions Analysis (FCA)
examined the activity center in two parts:
the northern half and southern half, This
was done because 1) the northern
quadrants are both substantially
undeveloped and/or will be the subject of
further land use decision-making
processes, and 2) the FDOT is analyzing
the southern quadrant's network as part
of the SR-84/CR-951 PD&E.
For the northwest quadrant, land
owners provided potential buildout
scenarios for analysis. Existing approved
zoning was used for lands in the
northeast quadrant.
Activity Center North
This portion of the analysis determined
the future traffic impacts north of 1-75 on
CR-951 with the addition of traffic
generated by the proposed/approved
development in the immediate vicinity. It
also analyzed one signalized access
versus two signalized access drives for
the proposed development.
Future year 2024 traffic volumes were
derived using the MPO's Collier County
2024 travel demand model. Model
modifications were made to the highway
Commercial Retail/Office and
Residential
Hotel, Service
Warehouse/Distribution
Provides opportunities for internal capture and "trip
chaining"
Provides for different peak hour/peak direction
travel demands
Market rate rental housing;
Affordable housing; Workforce
housing
Passive and active parks;
greenways; Churches, Civic
organizations
"Flex-time"; staggered start/stop
times; alternative work schedules
Transit, ridesharing, and van-pooling
incentives
Improved bicycle & pedestrian
facilities
Activity Center Freight Management
System; "Delivery Only" Hours;
Delivery Access Routes
Telecommuting, teleconferencing,
teleshopping
Concentrations of housing units that are available to
the neighboring workforce; close proximity to
retail/office services w/in the Activity Center
Reduced traffic impact; services provided to
neighboring residents; increased open space
Reduces peak hour demand; spreads out demand
over greater length of time
Reduces peak hour demand, reduces parking
requirements
Reduces vehicular demand between uses; reduces
congestion
Coordinate & consolidate deliveries to minimize the
number of freight vehicles needed, particularly
during peak periods
Reduces peak and non-peak travel demand
Table 4-6
Activity Center #9 Interchange Master Plan (IMP)
WilspnMiller
November2000 Section 4, Page 8
Section 4---Land Use & Transportation
8Al
network and socioeconomic data (ZDATA)
to better reflect the proposed
development and the network's physical
constraints. Figure 4-3 shows the
FSUTMS highway network changes made
to the model.
Proposed traffic from development in
the northeast and northwest quadrants
was derived using the Institute of Traffic
Engineer's (ITE's) current Trip Generation
Manual (6th ed.) for the five developments
on CR-951 north of 1-75:
The changes included removing the
proposed SR-84 east/west extension
(eliminated by the MPO as a result of the
SR-84 Corridor Study), removing the
centroid connection to/from zone 310 to
Golden Gate Parkway, and relocating the
centroid connection to more accurately
represent the travel paths to/from zone
289.
Land use ZDATA revisions included
refining forecast development levels for
the zones surrounding the interchange.
The employment level in zone 310
decreased from 1458 to 1030 while total
dwelling units increased from 708 to 1319.
Zone 311 was revised to include a 250-
room hotel. Table 4-7 on the next page
summarizes generation data.
* White Lake
,, City Gate
* Golden Gate Health Park (aka
Commerce Park)
* The Homan Parcel
* Magnolia Pond
Development potential was based on
approved or planned project expectations.
Traffic was assigned to the roadway
network using the MPO model's traffic
distribution for these zones. Model
volume and distribution plots are included
in the Appendix A. Background traffic was
derived by applying a 9 percent k factor
and 60 percent d factor to the MPO
model's background peak season
weekday traffic (PSWT).
ACTIVITY CENTER #9 - REVISED 2024 FSUTMS MODEL NETWORK OVERLAY
Figure 4-3
Activity Center #9 Interchange Master Plan (IMP)
November 2000 ,~ection 4, Page 9
WilspnMiller
Section 4---Land Use & Transportation
ACTIVITY CENTER #9
PM Peak Hour Trip Generation
8A
Totals
916,000 sf 188 918 111 111 0 0 77 807
116,000 sf 332 361 69 69 124 134 139 158
'!,ilr 1,860,000 sf 300 2201 250 250 0 0 50 1951
i!~' 34,000 sf 470 65 26 26 0 0 445
60
;~ 3,000 si 145 145 29 29 101 101 15 15
1135 3710 485 485 225 235 426 2991
Totals
30,000 sf 19 94 2 9 0 0 17 85
!i220,000 sf 508 549 31 47 157 170 320 332
588du 226 111 45 22 0 0 181 89
753 754 78 78 157 170 518 506
231 du 96 48 7 7 0 0 89 41
Totals 96 48 7 7 0 0 89 41
Totals
du
552 598 115 115 164 178 273 305
194 95 29 29 0 0 165 66
746 693 144 144 164 178 438 371
Totals
65 ac
121 454 0 0 0 0 121 454
121 454 0 0 0 0 121 454
I ITE's Trip Generation Manual, 6th Edilk3n
2 Golden Gate Health Park interr3al capture is base on the following percentages: 10% office to retail: 20% residential to retail;
other developelopmerlt internalization rate assumed at 10% of gross trips
Table 4-7
Activity Center #9 Interchange Master Plan (IMP)
WilspnMiller
November2000 Section 4, Page 10
Section 4--Land Use & Transportation
8A
One Access Drive
South Access Drive
126 [245) <156> f5 ~
F1 {2} ---~
245 (165) <~1> 32 ~
LEGEND
242 Background Traffic
{152} Whitebke Tragic
[1002l Cilygate Traf6c (Full Build)
(141) Passerby Capture
<146> Golden Gate Commerce Park
242 Homer
131 Magnolia Pond
~_ 24 {152} {1002} (141)
~ {7) [47]
~- 21 (295) [1941] (94)
North Accese Drive
South Access Drive
Activity Center #9
2024 PEAK SEASON PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC
Clt~ Gate Full Build Scenario
COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA
Two Access Drives
76(149)<94> 10 -~
[4] {1} ~
98 (66) <136> 13 ~
50 {99) <62> 6 -~
[3] {1 } ~
147 (99) <205> 197
L {91}[601](85)
~ {4}[24l
-- {118}1777](38)
24{61}[401](56)
(3) [23]
21 {177} [11641 (56)
Figure 4-4 shows the expected 2024
PM peak hour peak season traffic for both
one signal and two signalized access
scenarios for full buildout of the proposed
developments.
Capacity calculations were performed
for the traffic volumes shown in Figure 4-
4 using 1997 Highway Capacity
Software (HCS 3.1). These calculations
were performed for at-grade
intersections with both one and two
signalized access points along CR-951
for the proposed development.
Signalized intersection and detailed
arterial analyses were performed for the
two scenarios and are included in
Appendix B. Additionally maximum
queue lengths were calculated using the
red time equation for movements along
CR-951.
As shown in Figure 4-5, full buildout of
the proposed developments will result in
unacceptable LOS in the year 2024 with
either one or two signalized at-grade
intersections. Due to the proximity of 1-75
to the south, any type of grade separation
does not seem feasible. Any loading to the
north at Golden Gate Parkway seems
improbable due to physical constraints
(canals and neighborhoods). The only
solution appears to be a reduction in
proposed development.
Of the five developments shown in
Figure 4-4's traffic volumes, City Gate is
the largest traffic generator and is the
single project most likely to not build out to
its maximum potential. For testing
purposes, City Gate traffic was reduced to
obtain acceptable operation of CR-951
north of 1-75. Figure 4-6 shows these
reduced traffic volumes for City Gate for
the one and two signal scenarios.
As shown in Figure 4-6, City Gate traffic
would have to be reduced by 80 percent
for one signalized access point to operate
acceptably. For two signalized access
WilsOnMiller
Activity Center #9 Interchange Master Plan (IMP)
November2000 Sechon 4, Page 11
Section 4--Land Use & Transportation
8A
One Access Drive
F 111.4 mph l
850 ft
South Access Drive --
rF / 219.3 sec ]
/ 4.0 mph
1050 fl
North Access Drive
LEGEND
South Access Drive
Activity Center #9
2024 PEAK SEASON PM PEAK HOUR LEVEL OF SERVICE
City Gate Full Build Scenario
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
Figure 4-5
Two Access Drives
B / 35.6 mph
600 ft
F / 5.0 mph
1050 ft
E,~.~_~72.4 sec~J
F 111.1 mph
900 ft
118.8 se~
F / 12.7 mph
900 fi:
South Access Drive -
One Access Drive
~26(248) <156> 16 ~
[2] {2} ~
(165) <341· 32 ~r
LEGEND
242 Background Traffic
{152} Whltetake Traffic
/ [1002J Cilyg~te Traffic
(141) PasseCoy Capture
H4~a~
131 Ma~ia Pond
24 {152} 12~o}
{7} {10~
21 {295} 1388] (19)
North Access Drive
South Access Drive
Activity Center #9
2024 PEAK SEASON PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC
Reduced Clt7 Gate Development
COLUER COUNTY, FLORIDA
Figure 4-6
Two Access Drives
{91} [150] (22)
{4) [6]
{118} [195] (10)
v
24 {61} 1201] (28)
~ {3) [12l
-- 21 {177} [582] (28)
Activity Center #9 Interchange Master Plan (IMP) WilspnMiller
November2000 Sect/on 4, Page 12
Section 4---Land Use & Transportation
points to operate acceptably, City Gate
would have to reduce its traffic by 50
percent.
As shown in Figure 4-7, all intersections
and arterial links are expected to operate
at LOS D or better with the reduced
CityGate traffic, with the exception of the
southbound arterial link between the
signalized access drives. This is due
primarily to the short distance (900 ft.)
between the two. Maximum queues were
checked using the red time equation and
were found to be acceptable. However, if
LOS D is required for this link, City Gate
traffic would need to be further reduced to
approximately 65 percent of its maximum
buildout condition.
During the preparation of this report,
additional reseamh on the signalization of
the Access Rd. #1 intersection at CR-951
was being conducted by Tindale-Oliver,
Inc. Results of that research were not
available at the time of this printing.
Alternative East- West Collector
Roadway Analysis
As part of the assessment of future
roadway conditions, the study examined
the impacts of an interconnecting roadway
(Access Road #2) extending between
Santa Barbara Blvd. and CR-951. The
extension was tested as a four-lane
collector in 2024. The assignment of traffic
by the MPO model produced volumes of
7,100 (PSDT) on the new collector with
little or no change to volumes on CR-951
and the other surrounding roadways. This
indicates a rebalancing of traffic where
increases in certain trips as a result of a
network change are offset by reductions
of certain other trips (i.e., gains offset
losses). In addition, the relatively Iow
volume of traffic (7,100 PSDT) assigned
to the new extension indicates that a small
portion of the trips to and through the
area find the extension of much value. An
examination of the model's trip-making
One Access Drive
South Access Drlv.
C 129.8 mph
700 ft
D / 55.0 sec]
TD/18.6 mph
750 ft
Nor~hAccess DHve
LEGEND
South Access Drive
Activity Center #9
2024 PEAK SEASON PM PEAK HOUR LEVEL OF SERVICE
Reduced City Gate Development Scenario
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
Figure 4-7
Activity Center #9 Interchange Master Plan (IMP)
Two Access Drives
B / 39.3 mph
500 ft
F I 11.4 mph
860 ft
D / 44.6 sec I
/ 17.4 mph
650 ft
~f:,o / 54.6 sec I
18.5 mph
700 ft
WilspnMiller
November2000 Section 4, Page 13
Section 4--Land Use & Transportation
characteristics indicates that
approximately 80 percent of the new
road's traffic is generated in the
immediate vicinity of the access road by
TAZ 310 (the zone bisected by the new
roadway) and the zone immediately to the
east of CR-951 (TAZ 311). This indicates
that the road is of primary benefit to those
developments immediate adjacent to it,
with little or no benefit derived by the
surrounding roadway network.
Traffic volumes assigned to the major
roads within the study simulated by the
2024 "with" and "without" models are
presented in Table 4-8.
additional changes were assumed for the
land use forecast that the FDOT is using.
However, access management strategies
have been developed for the quadrants
and have been included in the Access
Management Plan contained herein.
Future conditions related to the Access
Management Plan assume two scenarios:
* Interim at-grade improvements to
SR-84 and the SR-84/CR-951
intersection
* Buildout with a grade separation at
the SR-84/CR-951 intersection
Santa Barbara Blvd, to CR~951 NA 7,100
N. of Access Rd. #2 54,600 54,500
S. of Access Rd. #2 65,600 63,900
S. of 1-75 92,800 92,400
S. of SR-84 75,700 76,000
W. of CR-951 35,300 33,600
N. of Access Rd. #2 51,600 54,600
S. of Access Rd. #2 51,400 51,500
S. of Radio Rd. (CR-856) · 43,300 42,600
W, of CR-951 48,000 45,200
Table 4-8
Activity Center South
The transportation network in the
southern portion of the activity center is the
subject of a PD&E analysis that URS
Greiner is conducting under the FDOT's
direction. The PD&E is intended to finalize
the design concept(s) for the proposed at-
grade and grade-separated improvements
needed at the junction of SR-84, CR-951,
and 1-75 to accommodate 20-year traffic.
Because the future improvements will
be dictated by the results of the FDOT's
study, the activity center future conditions
work did not include any additional travel
demand analysis of the southern
quadrants of Activity Center #9. No
IMP Recommendations
The IMP recommendations are divided
into two areas:
* Land Use Strategies
* Infrastructure Improvements
Land Use Strategies
The following land use strategies should
be considered for future land development
requests within the activity center.
1. Require mixed-use developments for
all future rezone requests. The value of
mixed-use developments, especially
when a residential component is
included, should be maximized. Trip
Activity Center #9 Interchange Master Plan (IMP)
WilspnMiller
November2000 Section 4, Page 14
Section 4--Land Use & Transportation
8Al
"chaining" and internal capture can
significantly reduce the "new external
trips" of a mixed-use project.
2. Promote Iow trip-generating
commercial and industrial uses within
existing and future commercial/
industrial developments. Consider
maximum square footage or trip
generation thresholds for high trip-
generating land uses. Provide land
development incentives for Iow trip-
generating uses.
3. Require internal site interconnections
between adjacent land uses to
facilitate convenient and safe internal
vehicular movements without affecting
the external roadway network.
4. Consider site planning strategies that
allow and encourage safe and
convenient pedestrian movements
between adjacent uses.
5, Require all future developments to
commit to the support of future public
transportation operations. New
developments should be encouraged
to anticipate future transit stop
locations when designing the site
access and circulation to land uses.
Infrastructure Improvements
1-75 separates infrastructure
improvements geographically and
functionally:
North of 1-75
1. Six-lane CR-951 (consideration should
be given to an eight-lane section south
of the new access road).
2. New signalized intersection of City
Gate and Golden Gate Commerce
Park project access roads
approximately 900 feet north of the
intersection of CR-951 with While Lake
Boulevard and Access Road #2.
3. interconnect Access Road #2 to new
project access road through the
Golden Gate Commeme Park
development.
Activity Center #9 Interchange Master Plan (IMP)
4. Relocate White Lake Boulevard to the
east and interconnect it to new City
Gate access road.
5. Maintain and signalize the existing
median opening at intersection of CR-
951 with White Lake Boulevard and
Access Road #2.
6. Relocate and bring the 1-75 westbound
off-ramp under signal control.
7. Add northbound right turn deceleration
lane at CR-951 and White Lake
Boulevard.
8. Interconnect all signals.
9. Locate a park-and-ride lot within the
activity center (may also be south of 1-
75).
10.Maintain access management
restrictions as shown on the Access
Management Plan.
South of I- 75
1. Six-lane CR-951 (further consideration
should be given to an eight-lane
section south of 1-75 through the SR-
84 intersection).
2. Six-lane SR-84 from relocated Radio
Road intersection to CR-951.
3. Interim at-grade improvements as part
of the multilane reconstruction of SR-
84 (will require right-of-way
acquisition):
* Extend the southbound right turn
lane of CR-951 approaching SR-84
,, Design the SR-84 leg of the
intersection to accommodate a free-
flow southbound right turn movement
* Construct a dedicated eastbound
right turn lane on SR-84 approach to
CR-951
* Construct a second eastbound left
turn lane on SR-84 approach to CR-
951
* Construct a second northbound left
turn lane on CR-951 approach to SR-
84
WilspnMiller
November2000 Section 4 , Page 15
Section 4--Land Use & Transportation
· Remove access connection to Burger
King parcel and relocate access
connection to Bedzel Circle in the
Commerce Center
· Analyze and modify existing gas
station driveways (northwest and
southwest of SR-84/CR-951
intersection) during multilaning
4. Interconnect all signals.
5. Future grade-separated improvements
(to be determined by FDOT study).
6. Maintain access management
restrictions as shown on the Access
Management Plan.
Access Management Plan
Access management is a critical
component to the safe and efficient
operational interface between land uses
and the adjacent street system. Strategies
that help preserve the integrity of the
arterial and collector roadways while
accommodating the safe and convenient
vehicle movement into and out of abutting
land uses is the goal and hallmark of a
well-managed system.
On August 18, 1992 the Collier County
BCC adopted Resolution No. 92-442 that
established a policy for access
management for the county's arterial and
collector roadways.
Recognizing the importance of access
management issues regarding the uses
within activity centers, Collier County
adopted Policy 4.4 of the Future Land Use
Element of the GMP. This required the
development and adoption of Access
Management Plans for each activity
center shown on the county's Future Land
Use Map. These Access Management
Plans, ultimately adopted as part of the
LDC (Appendix "E"), include the location
of existing and future access connections
(eg., driveways, entrance and access
roads, etc.), median openings, and traffic
signals. Additionally, the plans included
the identification of existing conditions that
may be subject to retrofit measures (eg.,
Act/vity Ceater //9 Interchange Master P/an (IMP)
closing a median or removing a driveway
connection).
Because of the expansion of the
boundary of Activity Center #9 and
because of the level of current and
projected traffic, it is appropriate for
Collier County to reexamine the current
Access Management Plan for Activity
Center #9 and modify it as needed.
Current Access Management P/an
The currently adopted Access
Management Plan originally was
developed to be as consistent as possible
with the access management guidelines
and standards in the County's access
management policy (Res. 92-442).
The currently adopted Activity Center #9
Access Management Plan map as shown in
Figure 4-8 reflects the current conditions
and identifies proposed additions. The
majority of the lands in this activity center
will be part of planned developments that
were subjected to a heightened level of
scrutiny regarding access management
issues. This helped establish a reasonable
access management environment. Many of
the projects are still undeveloped, which
creates opportunities for adjusting the
standards and guidelines to improve access
management features without placing
unnecessary burden on the landowners.
Lastly, the current plan, while addressing
access for adjacent lands, does not
adequately address the need for future
arterial and collector roadway
improvements. In its current form, the plan
does not include/anticipate the future need
for turn lanes, additional through-lanes,
grade-separated travel lanes, new interstate
ramps, ramp modifications, etc. It also lacks
measures to encourage and manage
internal connections between projects to
help minimize access connections to the
arterial/collector system.
WilspnMiller
November 2000 Sechon 4, Page 16
I
I
Section 4--Land Use & Transportation
Proposed Access Management Plan
As demonstrated in Figure 4-9, the
proposed Access Management Plan has
been developed to be more specific than
the current one. Once adopted as
amendments to the LDC, the changes will
serve as strict guidance to the state and
county permitting agencies in the review
and consideration of access management
improvements. The proposed Access
Management Plan maps have been
developed in cooperation with state and
county access management officials and
in consultation with adjoining property
owners.
For ease of feature identification and
use, the Access Management Plan maps
have been divided into one or more
panels for the areas north (Figure 4-10)
and south (Figure 4-11) of 1-75. Access
connections shown are to be regarded as
specific in number and location; minor
adjustments in the locations may be
appropriately determined at the time of
permitting. Specific features (eg.,
directional median openings) shall not be
changed to another feature type, nor shall
additional features be added (including
driveway connections) without an
appropriate amendment to the Access
Management Plan map adopted in the
LDC.
Activity Center#9 Interchange Master Plan (IMP)
November2000 Sect/on 4, Page 18
WilsOnMiller
8A lq
APPENDIX B
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION
ANALYSES
ARTERIAL ANALYSES
HCS-Siqnals 3.lb File:N951250.hcs
8A
1
Paqe _1
Inter:
Anal yst: WI LSONMI LLER
Date: 12/13/99
E/W St: NORT~ ACCESS RD
No. Lanes
LGConFi g
Vol tune
Lane Wi dth
RTOR Vol
Eastbound
L T R
2 1 2
L T R
1329 3 313
12.0 12. O 12.0
60
Signals Release 3. lb
Ci ty/St:
Proj #:
Peri od:
N/S St:
COLLIER CO FL
2 SIGNAL CITY
PM PEAK 2024
CR 951
GATE @ 50 %
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION
Westbound
L T R
2 1 2
L T R
'526 16 434
12.0 12.0 12.0
60
SUMMARY
Northbound
L T R
2 3 1
L T R
363 2589 113
12.0 12.0 12.0
60
Southbound
L T R
2 3 1
L T R
94 1632 288
12.0 12.0 12.0
60
Durat i on
O. 25
Area Type: A1 1
Si gnal
Phase Combi nati on 1
EB Left A
Thru
Ri ght
Peds
WB Left
Thru
Ri ght
Peds
NB Ri ght
SB Ri ght
Green
Yel 1 ow
Al 1 Red
Cyd e Length:
A
Appr/ Lane
Lane Group
Grp Capcity
2 3
A
A
A
A A
A A
other areas
Operations
4
NB Left
Thru
Right
Peds
S8 Left
Thru
m ght
Pecks
EB Ri ght
WB Right
A
6 7 8
A
A A
A A
A A
A
17.0 7.0 6.0
4.0 4.0 4.0
0.0 0.0 O.O
180. 0 secs
I ntersecti on Performance Surmnary.
Adj Sat Rati os Lane Group
F1 ow Rate
(s) v/c g/C Del ay LOS
A
A
A A
A
6.0 9. 0 109.0
4.0 4.0 4.0
0.0 0.0 2.0
Approach
Del ay LOS
Eastbound
L 350
T 74
R 474
Westbound
L 564
T 190
R 442
Northbound
L 389
T 3544
R 1409
Southbound
L 136
T 3170
R 1193
3502 0.99 0.100 125.8 F
1900 0.04 0.039 83.5 F
2842 0.56 0.167 70.5 E
3502 0.98 0.161 108.5 F
1900 0.09 0.100 73.8 E
2842 0.89 0.156 94.3 F
3502 0.98 0.111 90.4 F
5187 0.77 0.683 19.1 B
1615 0.04 0.872 1.5 A
3502 O. 73
5187 0.54
1615 0.20
Intersecti on Del ay = 44.6
101.7 F
102.1 F
27.4 C
O. 039 95.0 F
O. 611 20.4 C 22.5 C
O. 739 7.2 A
(sec/veh) Intersection LOS = D
HCS-Siqmals 3.lb
File:N9512F.hcs
8A
1
Paqe
Inter:
Anal y~t: WI LSONMI LLER
Date: 12/13/99
E/W St: NORTH ACCESS RD
No. Lanes
LGConfi g
Vol ume
Lane Wi dth
RTOR Vol
Eastbound
L T R
HCS: Signals Release 3. lb
City/St: COLLIER CO FL
Proj #: 2 SIGNAL CITY
Period: PM PEAK 2024
N/S St' CR 951
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
l~stbound Northbound
L T R L T R
2 1 2
L T R
329 5 313
12.0 12.0 IZ.O
60
2 1 2
L T R
933 28 777
12.0 12.0 12.0
60
2 3 1
L T R
!363 2790 195
12.0 12.0 12.0
60
GATE FULL BUILD
Southbound
L T R
2 3 1
L T U
163 1660 288
12.0 12.0 12.0
60
Duration 0.25 Area
Phase Combination 1 2
EB Left A
Thru
Right
Peds
~ Left A A
Thru A
Right A
Peds
NB Ri ght A A
SB Ri ght A
Green 13.0 31.0
Yellow 4.0 4.0
All Red 0.0 0.0
Cycle Length: 180.0 secs
Appr/ Lane
Lane Group
Grp Capcity
Type: All other areas
Signal Operations
3 4
NB
A
A
SB
A
A
Left
Thru
Ri ght
Peds
Left
Thru
mght
Peds
mght
mght
5
A
A
6 7 8
A
A A
A A
A
A
~ A A
~ A
6.0 6.0 4.0 94.0
4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0
Intersection Performance Sur~nary_
Adj Sat Rati os Lane Group
ow Rate
(s) v/c g/C Del ay LOS
Approach
Del ay LOS
Eastbound
L 272
T 74
R 395
Westbound
L 953
T 443
R 821
Northbound
L 292
T 2968
R 1409
Southbound
L 136
T 2738
R 1023
3502 1.27 0.078 231.0 F
1900 0.07 0.039 83.7 F 163.9 F
2842 0.67 0.139 78.1 E
3502 1.03 0.272 102.7 F
1900 0.07 0.233 53.8 D 91.1 F
2842 0.92 0.289 77.4 E
3502 1.31 0.083 223.8 F
5187 0.99 0.572 41.3 D 59.8 E
1615 0.10 0.872 1.6 A
Intersection Delay = 72.
3502 1.26
5187 0.64
1615 0.23
4
0.039 231.6 F
0.528 30.5 C 44.7 D
0.633 14.3 B
(sec/ve~ Intersection LOS = E
~C~S£Signals 3.lb File:SgSl120.hcs
8A
1
Inter:
Anal yst: WI LSONMI LLER
Date: 12/13/99
E/W St: SOUTH ACCESS RD
No. Lanes
LGConfi g
Vol tune
Lane ~ dth
RTOR Vol
Eastbound
L T R
2 1 2
L T R
546 9 783
12.0 12.0 12.0
60
HCS: Si gnal s Rel ease 3. 1 b
Ci ty/St:
Proj #:
Peri od:
N/S St:
COLLIER CO FL
1 SIGNAL CITY GATE @ 20 % DEV
PM PEAK 2024
CR 951
SI GNALI ZED I NTERSECTI ON SUMMARY
[ Westbound Northbound
IL T R L T R
I L T R
1723 54 404
112.0 12.0 12.0
60
Southbound
L T R
2 3 1
L T R
907 2037 179
12.0 12.0 12.0
60
2 3 1
L T R
101 1343 481
12.0 12.0 12.0
60
Durati on O. 25
Area Type: M 1
Si gnal
Phase Combi nati on I 2 3
EB Left A
Thru A
Right A
Peds
WB Left A A
Thru A A
.Ri ght A A
Peds
NB Ri ght A A
SB Ri ght A
Green 33.0 8.0 9.0
Yell ow 4.0 4.0 4.0
All Red O. 0 0. O O.O
Cycle Length: 180. O secs
Appr/ Lane
Lane Group
Grp Capcity
other areas
Operations
4
NB Left
Thru
Ri ght
Peds
SB Left
Thru
right
Peds
Ell Right
WB Right
5 6 7
A A
A A
A A
8
A
A
A
A A
A
15.0 32.0 57.0
4.0 4.0 4.0
O.O O. 0 2.0
Intersection Performance Stunmary.
^dj Sat Rati os Lane Group
F1 ow Rate
(s) v/c g/C Del ay LOS
Approach
Delay LOS
Eastbound
L 661
T IO6
R 1026
INestbound
L 895
T 232
R 647
Northbound
L 1012
T 2709
R 1301
Southbound
L 311
T 1671
R 870
Intersecti
3502 0.87 0.189 82.9 F
1900 0.08 0.056 81.0 F
2842 0.74 0.361 53.1 D
3502 0.85 0.256 71.6 E
19OO 0.25 O. 122 72.0 E
2842 0.56 0.228 62.6 E
3502 0.94 0.289 65.0 E
5187 0.79 0.522 35.2 D
1615 0.10 0.806 3.7 A
3502 0.34
5187 0.85
1615 0.51
on Delay = 55.0-
66.0 E
68.8 E
42.8 D
0.089 77.4 E
0.322 59.0 E 52.7 D
0.539 26.6 C
(sec/veh) Intersection LOS : D
HCS-Siqnals 3,lb
File:S9511F.hcs
Paqe
}{CS: Signals Release 3. lb
Inter:
Analyst: WlLSONMILLER
Date: 12/13/99
E/W St: SOUTH ACCESS RD
City/St' COLLIER CO FL
Proj #: 1 SIGNAL CITY
Peri od: PM PEAK 2024
N/S St: CR 951
GATE FULL
BUILD
No. Lanes
LGConfi g
Vol tune
Lane Wi dth
RTOR Vol
Eastbound
L T R
2 1 2
L T R
546 9 783
12.0 12.0 12.0
60
SI GNALI ZED I NTERSECTI ON SUMMARY
Mst bound Nor t hbound
L T R
L T R
2 3 1
L T R
907 2037 508
12.0 12.0 12.0
60
Southbound
L T R
2 3 1
L T R
287 1343 481
12.0 12.0 12.0
60
2 1 2
L T R
2351 54 1319
12.0 12.0 12.0
60
Duration 0.25
Phase Combi nati on 1
EB Left A
Thru
Ri ght
Peds
WB Left A
Thru
Ri ght
Peds
NB Ri ght A A
SB Ri ght A
Green 19.0 70. 0
Yel 1 ow 4.0 4.0
All Red 0.0 0.0
Cycle Length: 180.0 secs
2
3
A
A A
A A
Area Type: A1 1 other areas
Si gnal Operati OhS
4
NB Left
Thru
Ri ght
Peds
SI] Left
Thru
Ri ght
Peds
EB Ri ght A
va mght A
5.0 8.0
4.0 4.0
0.0 0.0
Appr/ Lane
Lane Group
Grp Capcity
5
A
A
Intersection Performance Summary
Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group
ow Rate
(s) v/c g/C Delay LOS
6 7 8
A
A A
A A
A
A
A
19.0 33.0
4.0 4.0
0.0 2.0
Approach
Delay LOS
Eastbound
L 370
T 53
R 632
Westbound
L 1809
T 834
R 1437
Northbound
L 603
T 1614
R 1391
Southbound
L 156
T 951
R 520
Intersecti
3502 1.55 0.106 342.8 F
1900 0.17 0.028 87.0 F
2842 1.20 0.222 176.4 F
3502 1.37 0.517 212.8 F
1900 0.07 0.439 29.2 C
2842 0.92 0.506 51.3 D
3502 1.58 0.172 345.0 F
5187 1.33 0.311 214.2 F
1615 0.34 0.861 2.6 A
246.9 F
154.6 F
221.2 F
3502 1.94 0.044 529.8 F
5187 1.49 0.183 298.2 F 283.8 F
1615 0.85 0.322 69.8 E
on Delay = 219.3 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = F
HCS-Siqnals
3.lb File:S951235.hcs
Paqe 1
Inter:
Anal yst:
Date:
E/W St:
WI LSONMILLER
12/13/99
SOUTH ACCESS RD
No. Lanes
LGConfig
Volume
Lane ~dth
RTOR Vol
Eastbound
L T R
2 1 2
L T R
'217 4 470
12.0 12.0 12.0
60
HCS: Signals Release 3. lb
City/St'
Proj #:
Period:
N/S St'
COLLIER CO FL
2 SIGNAL CITY GATE @ 35%
PM PEAK 2024
CR 951
SI GNALI ZED I NTERSECTI ON SUMMARY
~estbound
L T R
2 1 2
L T R
600 11 245
12.0 12.0 12.0
60
Northbound
L T R
2 3 1
L T R
544 2396 152
12.0 12.0 12.0
60
Southbound
L T R
2 3 1
L T R
64 1986 193
12.0 12.0 12.0
60
Durati on O. 25 Area Type: A11
Si gnal
Phase Combi nati on 1 2 3
EB Left A
Thru A
Ri ght A
Peds
WB Left A A
Thru A A
Ri ght A A
Peds
NB Ri ght A A
SB Ri ght A
Green 11. O 13.0 6. O
Yel 1 ow 4.0 4.0 4. O
All Red 0.0 0.0 0.0
Cycle Length: 190. 0 secs
Appr/ Lane
Lane Group
Grp Capcity
other areas
Operat ions
4
NB Left
Thru
Ri ght
Peds
SB Left
Thru
Ri ght
Peds
ESRight
I~BRight
5 6 7 8
A A
A A
A A
A
A
A
A A
A
6.0 18. 0 110.0
4.0 4.0 4.0
0.0 0.0 2.0
Intersecti on Performance Smmmary
Adj Sat Rati os Lane Group
F1 ow Rate
(s) v/c g/C Delay LOS
Approach
Delay LOS
Eastbound
L 221
T 70
R 583
Westbound
L 535
T 240
R 509
Northbound
L 535
T 3631
R 1420
Southbound
L 129
T 3030
R 1088
Intersecti
3502 1.03 0.063 158.0 F
1900 0.06 0.037 88.7 F
2842 0.74 0.205 75.8 E
3502 1.18 0.153 180.1 F
1900 0.05 0.126 73.1 E
2842 0.38 0.179 69.2 E
3502 1.07 0.153 116.9 F
5187 0.69 0.700 16.7 B
1615 0.07 0.879 1.5 A
3502 0.52
5187 0.69
1615 0.13
on Delay = 54.1
104. 1 F
152.8 F
34.2 C
O. 037 91.7 F
0.584 27.9 C 28.7 C
O. 674 11.1 B
(sec/veh) Intersection LOS = D
HCS-Si~nals 3.lb
File:S951250.hcs
PacLe
Inter:
Analyst: WILSONMILLER
Date: 12/13/99
E/W St: SOUTIt ACCESS RD
No. Lanes
LGConfi g
Vol ume
Lane Wi dth
RTOR Vol
Eastbound
L T R
2 1 2
L T R
'217 4 470
,12.0 12.0 12.0
60
HCS: Signals Release 3. lb
City/St:
Proj #:
Period:
N/S St'
COLLIER CO FL
2 SIGNAL CITY GATE
PM PEAK 2024
CR 951
5O%
SI GNALI ZED I NTERSECTI ON SUMMARY
l~stbound
L T R
2 1 2
L T R
808 15 313
12.0 12.0 12. O
60
Northbound
L T R
2 3 1
L T R
544 2412 190
12.0 12.0 12. O
60
I Southbound
IL t R
} 2 3 1
I L T
]78 2102 193
112.0 12.0 12.0
6o
Durati on O. 25
Phase
EB Left
Thru
Ri ght
Peds
WB Left
Thru
Ri ght
Peds
NB Ri ght A
SB Ri ght A
Green 11.0 23.0
Yel 1 ow 4. O 4.0
Ail Red 0.0 0.0
Cycle Length: 178.0 secs
Combi nat i on 1
A
A
Area Type: All other areas Si gnal Operati OhS
2 3 4
NB Left
A Thru
A Ri ght
Peds
A SB Left
A A Thru
A A Ri ght
Peds
A EB Ri ght A A
WB Ri ght A
6.0 6.0 18.0 88.0
4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0
Appr/ Lane
Lane Group
Grp Capcity
5
A
A
Intersection Performance Smmmry
Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group
Flow Rate
(s) v/c g/C Delay LOS
6 7 8
A
A A
A A
A
A
Approach
Delay LOS
Eastbound
L 236
T 75
R 623
Westbound
L 767
T 363
R 703
Northbound
L 571
T 3235
R 1406
Southbound
L 138
T 2594
R 962
3502 0.97 0.067 131.7 F
1900 0.05 0.039 82.6 F 89.5 F
2842 0.69 0.219 67.3 E
3502 1.11 0.219 136.3 F
1900 0.04 0.191 58.8 E 116.4 F
2842 0.38 0.247 56.0 E
3502 1.00 0.163 87.2 F
5187 0.78 0.624 24.8 C 34.9 C
1615 0.10 0.871 1.6 A
Intersecti on Del ay = 54.
3502 0.59
5187 0.85
1615 0.15
6
O. 039 87. 5 F
O. 500 40. 3 D 40. 5 D
O. 596 16.0 B
($ec/veh) Intersection LOS = D
HCS-Siqnals 3.lb File:SgS1250.hcs
Paqe___l
Inter:
Analyst' WILSONMILLER
Date: 12/13/99
E/W St: SOUTH ACCESS RI)
No. Lanes
LGConfi g
Vol ume
Lane Wi dth
RTOR Vol
Eastbound
L T R
2 I 2
L T R
217 4 470
12.0 12.0 12.0
60
HCS: Si gnal s Rel ease 3. I b
Ci ty/St:
Proj #:
Peri od:
N/S St:
COLLIER CO FL
2 SIGNAL CITY GATE FULL BUILD
PM PEAK 2024
CR 951
SI GNALI ZED I NTERSECTI ON SUMMARY
1~estbound
L T R
2 1 2
L T R
1418 26 542
12.0 12.0 12.0
6O
Northbound
L T R
2 3 1
L T R
544 2467 313
12.0 12.0 12.0
60
Southbound
L T R
2 3 1
L T R
124 2491 193
12.0 12.0 12.0
60
Duration 0.25
Phase Combination 1
EB Left A
Thru
Right
Peds
WB Left A
Thru
Right
Peds
NB Right A
SB Ri ght A
Green 6.0
Yellow 4.0
All Red 0.0
Cycle Length: 180.0
Area Type: All other areas Si gna] Operati OhS
2 3 4
NB Left
A Thru
A Ri ght
Peds
A SB Left
A A Thru
A A Ri ght
Peds
A EB Ri ght A
I~B Ri ght A
47.0 6.0 6.0
4.0 4.0 4.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
secs
Appr/ Lane
Lane Group
Grp Capcity
5
A
A
Intersection Performance Summary
Adj Sat Rati os Lane Group
FI ow Rate
(s) v/c g/C Del ay LOS
6 7 8
A
A A
A A
A
A
A
10. 0 79.0
4.0 4.0
0.0 2.0
Approach
Delay LOS
Eastbound
L 136
T 74
R 489
Westbound
L 1128
T 612
R 1074
Northbound
L 409
T 2709
R 1409
Southbound
L 136
T 2305
R 825
Intersecti
3502 1.68 0.039 420.8 F
1900 0.05 0.039 83.6 F
2842 0.88 0.172 89.9 F
3502 1.32 0.322 212.9 F
1900 0.04 0.322 42.0 D
2842 0.47 0.378 42.7 D
3502 1.40 0.117 261.5 F
5187 0.96 0.522 42.5 D
1615 0.19 0.872 1.8 A
203.5 F
168.0 F
75.9 E
3502 0.96 0.039 130.8 F
5187 1.14 0.444 115.0 F 111.3 F
1615 0.17 0.511 23.6 C
on Delay = 118.8 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = F
St eve Pi vni cki
Wi 1 sonMi I I er I nc.
HCS:
Arterial s Rel ease 3. lb
8A1'
Phone: 727- 615- 1319
E- Mai I:
OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS
Arteri al Name:
Fi I e Case:
Prepared By:
Di recti on:
Date:
CR 951
2024 2 SIGNAL CITY GATE @ 100%
WI LSONMI LLER
Nort h- bound
12/14/99
Descri pti on of Arteri al
Anal ysi s Peri od Length O. 25 hr
Seg.
Cross Street Name
Length
(~)
Cl ass
Free
F1 ow
Speed
(mph)
Running
Time
(sec)
Section
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
CR 951
SOUTH ACCESS RD
NORTH ACCESS RD
0.28 2 45 28.3
0.20 2 45 21.8
1
2
Seg
Intersecti on Del ay Esti mates
Cycle Green v/c Lane
Length Ratio Ratio Cap.
C g/C X c
PVG Arr. I Unit
if Type Fac- Ext.
Input AT t or (sec)
Init. CntrI.
Queue Delay
(veh) (sec)
Other Inter.
Delay LOS
(sec)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
180. 0
180. 0
0.522 0.959 2709
0.572 0.990 2968
1.000 3.0
0.187 3.0
0 50.8 0.0 D
0 43. 1 0.0 D
13
14
15
8A
Seg.
Arterial Level of Service
Sect.
Inter. Sum of Sum of
Running Control. Other Time by Length by Arterial
Time Delay Delay Section Section Speed
(sec) (sec) (sec) (sec) (mi) (mph)
Arterial
LOS by
Section
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
1 28. 3 50. 8 0. 0 79. 1 O. 28 12. 7
2 21. 8 43. 1 O. 0 64.9 O. 20 11. I
F
F
Grand Sum of Time (x) = 144.0 sec
Grand Sum of Length (y) = 0. 48 mi 1 es
Arterial Speed = 3600 x (y)/(x) = 12.0 mph
Arterial Level of Service, LOS = F
1:
2:
3:
4:
5:
6:
7:
8:
9:
10:
11:
12:
13:
14:
15:
I ntersecti on Fi I es i n the Anal ysi s
E: \act i vi ty9\S9512F, hcs
E: \acti vi ty9\Ng$1ZF, hcs
Steve Pi vni cki
Wi I sonMi 11 er I nc.
HCS:
Arterials Release 3. lb
Phone: 727-615- 1319
E-Mai 1:
OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS
Arteri al Name:
Fi I e Case:
Prepared By:
Di recti on:
Bate:
CR 951
2024 2 SIGNALS CITY GATE @ 50%
Sout h- bound
12/14/99
Descri pti on of Arteri al
Anal ysi s Peri od Length O. 25 hr
Seg.
Cross Street Name
Free
Art. Flow Running
Length Class Speed Time
(mi) (mpD (sec)
Section
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
CR 951
NORTtt ACCESS RD
SOUT[IACCESS RD
1.06 I 50 76.3
0.20 2 45 21.8
Seg
Intersecti on Del ay Esti mates
Cycle Green v/c Lane
Length Ratio Ratio Cap.
C g/C X c
PVG Arr. I Unit
if Type Fac- Ext.
Input AT tot (sec)
Init. Cntrl.
Queue Delay
(veh) (se~
Other Inter.
I)elay LOS
(sec)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
180. 0
178.0
0.611 0.542 3170
0.500 0.853 2594
3 1.000 3.0
3 0.800*3.0
0 20.7 0.0 C
0 41.4 0.0 D
13
14
15
Seg.
Arteri al Level of Servi ce
Sect.
Inter. Sum of Sum of
Running Control. Other Time by Length by Arterial
Ti me Del ay Del ay Secti on Secti on Speed
(sec) (sec) (sec) (sec) (mi) (mph)
Arteri al
LOS by
Sect i on
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
I 76.3 31.0 0. 0 107.3 1.06 35.6
2 21.8 122.5 0. 0 144.3 0.20 5.0
Grand Sum of Time (x) = 251.5 sec
Grand Sum of Length (y) = 1.26 miles
^rterial Speed = 3600 x (y)/(x) = 18.0 mph
Arterial Level of Service, LOS = E
1:
2:
3:
4:
Intersection Files in the Analysis
E: \acti vi ty9\N9512F, hcs
E: \acti vi ty9\S9512F, hcs
5'
6:
7:
8:
9:
10:
11:
12:
13:
14:
15:
Steve Pi vni cki
Wi 1 sonMi I 1 er I nc.
HCS:
Arterials Rel ease 3. lb
1
Phone: 727- 615- 1319
E-Mai I:
OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS
Arteri al Name:
Fi I e Case:
Prepared By:
Di recti on:
Dar e:
2024 1 SIGNAL CITY GATE @ 100%
WlLSONMILLER
North-bound
12/14/99
Descri pti on of Arteri al
Anal ysi s Peri od Length 0. 25 hr
Seg.
Cross Street Name
Length
Cl ass
Free
FI ow
Speed
(~ph)
Running
Time
(sec)
Secti on
O
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
CR 951
SOUTH ACCESS RD
O. 28 2 45 28.3
Seg
Intersecti on Del ay Esti mates
Cycle Green v/c Lane
Length Ratio Ratio Cap.
C g/C X c
PVG Arr. I Unit
if Type Fac- Ext.
Input AT tor (sec)
Init. Cntrl.
Queue Delay
(veh) (sec)
Ot her Int er.
Del ay LOS
(sec)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
180.0 0.311 1.328 1614
3 1. 000 3. 0
0 224.9
0.0 F
13
14
15
Seg.
Arteri al Level of Service
Sect.
Inter.
Running Control.
Ti me Del ay
(sec) (sec)
Sum of Sum of Arteri al
Other Ti me by Length by /h-terial LOS by
Del ay Section Section Speed Section
(sec) (sec) (mi) (mph)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
1 28.3 224.9
0.0 253.2 0.28 4.0
F
Grand Sum of Time (x) = 253.2 sec
Grand Sum of Length (y) = O. 28 mil es
Arterial Speed = 3600 x (y)/(x) = 4.0 mph
Arterial Level of Service, LOS = F
l:
2:
3:
4:
Int ersecti on
E: \acti vi ty9\S9511F, hcs
Files in
t he Anal ysi s
5:
6:
7:
8:
9:
I0:
11:
12:
13:
14:
15:
Steve Pi vni cki
Wi I sonMi 11 er I nc.
tiCS:
Art eri al s Rel ease 3. lb
Phone: 727-615- 1319
E-Mail:
OPERATIONAL A~IALYSI S
Arteri al Name:
Fi I e Case:
Prepared By:
Di recti on:
Date:
2024 1 SIGNAL CITY GATE @ 10006
WI LSONMI LLER
Sour h- bound
12/14/99
Descri pti on of Arteri al
Anal ysi s Peri od Length O. 25 hr
Seg.
Cross Street Name
Length
(~)
C1 ass
Free
FI ow
Speed
(mph)
Running
Ti me
(sec)
Section
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
13
14
15
CR 951
SOUTH ACCESS RD
1.26 I 50
90. 7
Seg
Intersecti on Del ay Esti mates
Cycle Green v/c Lane
Length Ratio Rat i o Cap.
C g/C X c
PVG Arr. I Unit
if Type Fac- Ext.
Input AT tor (sec)
Init. Cntr].
Queue Delay
(red (sec)
Other Inter.
Delay LOS
(sec)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
10
11
180.0
0.183 1.487 951
3 1.000 3.0
0 307.2
0.0 F
13
14
15
'8Al
Seg.
Arteri al Level of Servi ce
Sect.
Inter. Sum of Sum of
Running Control. Other Time by Length by Arterial
Ti me Del ay Del ay Secti on Secti on Speed
(sec) (sec) (sec) (sec) (mi) (mph)
Arteri al
LOS by
Secti on
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
1 90.7 307.2 0.0 398.0 1.26 11.4
F
Grand Sum of Time (x) = 398.0 sec
Grand Sum of Length (y) = 1.26 mil es
Arterial Speed = 3600x (y)/(x) = 11.4 mph
Arterial Level of Service, LOS = F
2:
3:
4:
Intersecti on Fi 1 es i n the Anal ysi s
E: \acti vi ty9\S951 IF. hcs
5:
6:
7:
8:
9:
10:
11:
12:
13:
14:
15:
Steve Pi vni cki
Wi 1 sonMi 11 er I nc.
ltCS:
Arteri al s Rel ease 3. lb
'8A 1
Phone: 727- 615- 1319
E- Mai 1:
Fax:
OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS
Arteri al Name:
Fi 1 e Case:
Prepared By:
Di recti on:
Date:
CR 951
2024 2 SIGNALS CITY GATE @ 50%
WI LSONMI LLER
Nort h- bound
12/14/99
Anal ysi s Peri od Length
Descri pti on of Arteri al
0.25 hr
Seg.
Cross Street Name
Length
(~)
CI ass
Free
Fl ow
Speed
(mph)
Running
Time
(sec)
Section
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
CR 951
SOUTIt ACCESS RD
NORTH ACCESS RD
0.28 2 45 28.3
0.20 2 45 21.8
Seg
Intersection Delay Estimates
Cycle Green v/c Lane
Length Ratio Ratio Cap.
C g/C X c
PVG Arr. I Unit
if Type Fac- Ext.
Input AT tot (sec)
Init. Cntrl.
Queue Delay
(ve~ (sec)
Other Inter.
Delay LOS
(sec).
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
178.0
180.0
0.624 0.785 3235
0.683 0.769 3544
3 1.000 3.0
3 O. 525 3.0
0 26.2 0.0 C
0 19.7 0.0 B
13
14
15
'8A 1
Seg.
Arterial Level of Servi ce
Sect.
Inter. Sum of Sum of
Running Control. Other Time by Length by Arterial
Time Delay Delay Section Section Speed
(sec) (sec) (sec) (sec) (mi) (mph)
Arteri al
LOS by
Section
1
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
1 28.3 26.2 O. 0 54.5 O. 28 18.5
2 21.8 19. 7 0. 0 41.5 O. 20 17.4
D
D
Grand Sum of Time (x) = 96.0 sec
Grand Sum of Length (y) : O. 48 miles
Arteri al Speed : 3600 x (y)/(x) : 18.0 mph
Arterial Level of Service, LOS = I)
1'
2:
3:
4:
Intersection Files in the Analysis.
E: \acti vi ty9\S951250, hcs
E: \acti vi tygkN951250, hcs
5:
6:
7:
8:
9:
10:
11:
12:
13:
14:
15:
Steve Pi vni cki
Wi I sonMi 11 er I nc.
HCS:
Arterial s Rel ease 3. lb
Phone: 727-615- 1319
E- Mai 1:
OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS
Arteri al Name:
Fi I e Case:
Prepared By:
Di recti on:
Dar e:
CR 951
2024 2 SIGNAL CITY GATE @ 100%
WILSONMILLER
South-bound
12/14/99
Descri pti on of ^rteri al
Anal ysi s Peri od Length O. 25 hr
Seg.
Cross Street Name
Length
(~)
C1 ass
Free
Fl ow
Speed
(mph)
Running
Time
(sec)
Section
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
CR 951
NORTH ACCESS RD
SOUTH ACCESS RD
1.06 1 50
0.20 2 45
76.3
21.8
Seg
Intersecti on Del ay Esti mates
Cycle Green v/c Lane
Length Ratio Ratio Cap.
C g/C X c
PVG Arr. I Unit
i f Type Fac- Ext.
Input AT tot (sec)
Init. CntrI.
Queue Del ay
(veh) (sec)
Other Inter.
Delay LOS
(sec)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
I0
11
12
180.0
180.0
0.528 0.638 2738
0.444 1.138 2305
3 1.000 3.0
3 0.727 3.0
0 31.0 0.0 C
0 122.5 0.0 F
13
14
15
8A
1
Seg.
Arterial LeYel of Service
Sect.
Inter. Sum of Sum of
Running Control. Other Time by Length by Arterial
Time Del ay Del ay Secti on Secti on Speed
(sec) (sec) (sec) (sec) (mi) (mph)
Arteri al
LOS by
Sect i on
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
1 76.3 20. 7 O. 0 97.0 1.06 39.3
2 21.8 41.4 O. 0 63. 2 O. 20 11.4
B
F
Grand Sum 'of Time (x) = 160. 2 sec
Grand Sum of Length (y) = 1.26 mil es
Arterial Speed = 3600 x (y)/(x) = 28.3 mph
Arterial Level of Service, LOS = C
1:
E:
3:
4:
Intersection Files in the Analysis
E: \activityg\N951250. hcs
E: \activity~\S951250. hcs
5:
6:
7:
8:
9:
10:
11:
12:
13:
14:
15:
St eve Pi vni cki
Wi I sonMi 11 er I nc.
HCS:
Arterial s Rel ease 3. lb
Phone: 727-615- 1319
E-Mai I:
OPERATI 0NAL ANALYSIS
Arteri al Name:
Fi I e Case:
Prepared By:
Di recti on:
Dar e:
2024 2 SIGNALS CITY GATE @ 35
WILSONMILLER
South-bound
12/14/99
Description of Arteri al
Anal ysi s Peri od Length O. 25 hr
Seg.
Cross Street N~
Length
(~)
C1 ass
Free
Flow
Speed
(mph)
Running
Time
(sec)
Sect i on
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
CR 951
SOUTH ACCESS RB
0.20 2 45 21.8
Seg
Intersecti on Del ay Esti mates
Cycle Green v/c Lane
Length Rat i o Ratio Cap.
C g/C X c
PVG Arr. I Unit
if Type Fac- Ext.
Input AT tot (sec)
Init. Cntrl.
Queue Del ay
(veh) (sec)
Other Inter.
Delay LOS
(sec)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
190.0
0.584 0.690 3030
4 O. 100'3. 0
0 16.9 0.0 B
13
14
15
1
Seg.
^rterial Level of Service
Sect.
Inter. Sum of Sum of
Running Control. Other Time by Length by Arterial
Ti me Del ay Del ay Secti on Secti on Speed
(sec) (sec) (sec) (sec) (mi) (
Arteri al
LOS by
Secti on
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
1 21.8 16.9 O. 0 38. 7 O. 20 18.6
D
Grand Sum of Time (x) = 38. 7 sec
Grand Sum of Length (y) = O. 20 mi 1 es
Arterial Speed = 3600 x (y)/(x) = 18. 6 mph
^rterial Level of Service, LOS = D
1:
2:
3:
4:
5:
6:
7:
8:
9:
10:
11:
12:
13:
14:
15:
I ntersecti on Fi 1 es i n the Anal ysi s
E: \acti vi ty9\S951235, hcs
Steve Pi vni cki
Wi 1 sonMi 11 er I nc.
HCS:
Arterials Rel ease 3. lb
8A
Phone: 727- 615- 1319
E-Mail:
OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS
Arteri al Name:
Fi I e Case:
Prepared By:
Direct i on:
Dar e:
2024 I SIGNAL CITY GATE AT 20%
WlLSONMILLER
North-bound
12/14/99
Descri pti on of Arteri al
Analysis Period Length O. 25 hr
Seg.
Cross Street Name
Length
(~i)
Art.
CI ass
Free
F1 ow
Speed
(mph)
Running
Time
(sec)
Section
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
CR 951
SOUTH ACCESS RD
0.28 2 45
28.3
Seg
Intersecti on Del ay Esti mates
Cycle Green v/c Lane
Length Ratio Ratio Cap.
C g/C X c
PVG Arr. I Unit
if Type Fac- Ext.
Input AT tor (sec)
Init. Cntrl.
Queue Delay
(veh) (sec)
Other Inter.
Delay LOS
(sec)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
180.0
O. 522 O. 791 2709
4 0.100'3.0
0 25.8 0.0 C
13
14
15
Seg.
Arteri al Level of Servi ce
Sect.
Inter. Sum of Sum of
Running Control. Other Time by Length by Arterial
Ti me Del ay Del ay Secti on Secti on Speed
(sec) (sec) (sec) (sec) (mi) (mph)
Arteri al
LOS by
Section
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
I 28.3 25.8 0.0 54.1 0.28 18.6
Grand Sum of Ti me (x) = 54. 1 sec
Grand Sum of Length (y) = O. 28 mi I es
Arterial Speed = 3600 x (y)/(x) = 18. 6 mph
Arterial Level of Service, LOS = I)
1:
2:
3:
4:
5:
6:
7:
8:
9:
10:
11:
12:
13:
14:
15:
Intersection Files in the Analysis
E: \acti vi ty9\S951120, hcs
Steve Pi vni cki
Wi I sonMi I I er I nc.
Arterials Release 3. lb
8A
Phone: 727- 615- 1319
E-Mai I:
OPERATIONAL AI~ALYSI S
Arteri al Name:
Fi I e Case:
Prepared By:
Di recti on:
Dar e:
2024 1 SIGNAL CITY GATE @ 2096
WI LSONMI LLER
Sour h- bound
12/14/99
Descri pti on of Arteri al
Anal ysi s Peri od Length O. 25 hr
Seg.
Cross Street Name
Length
(~)
C1 ass
Free
F1 ow
Speed
(mph)
Running
Ti me
(sec)
Sect i on
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
CR 961
SOUTH ACCESS RD
1.26 1 50 90.7
Seg
Intersection Delay Estimates
Cycle Green v/c Lane
Length Ratio Ratio Cap.
C g/C X c
PVG Arr. I Unit
if Type Fac- Ext.
Input AT tot (sec)
Init. Cntrl.
Queue Del ay
(veh) (sec)
Other Inter.
Delay LOS
(sec)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
180.0
0.322 0.846 1671
3 1.000 3.0
0 61.5 0.0 E
13
14
15
Seg.
Arterial Level of Servi ce
Sect.
Inter. Sum of Sum of
Running Control. Other Time by Length by Arterial
Time Delay Delay Section Section Speed
(sec) (sec) (sec) (sec) (mi) (mi)!o
Art eri al
LOS by
Sect i on
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
1 90.7 61,5 0.0 152.2 1.26 29.8
C
Grand Sum of Time (x) = 152. 2 sec
Grand Sum of Length (y) = 1.26 mi I es
Arterial Speed = 3600 x (y)/(x) = 29. 8 mph
Arterial Level of Service, LOS = C
1'
2:
3:
4:
5:
6:
7:
8:
9:
10:
11:
12:
13:
14:
15:
Intersection Files in the Analysis
E: \acti vi ty9\S951120, hcs
I Introduction
Vision Statement
Design Development
4--Land Use & Transportation
Implementation Strate~tes
ix A
~?
r
lion Analyses
Section 5--Implementation Strategies
IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES
Implementation of the IMP requires a
well planned strategy. The BCC must take
certain steps to initiate the improvement
processwto bring these design concepts
off the paper and into Activity Center #9.
The following strategies provide the
structure under which the IMP's design
concepts can be implemented.
Zoning Overlay
As required by the BCC's adopted IMP
study parameters, establishing a zoning
overlay district will be one of the
implementation strategies. The purpose of
the overlay district, which will encompass
all properties within the boundaries of
Activity Center #9, will be to encourage
and direct development within the activity
center. The overlay district will ensure that
the design of landscape, architecture, and
signage will be regulated and approved in
accordance with the provision of the
specific LDC section.
Division 2.4 Landscaping and
Buffering
Division 2.5 Signage
Division 2,6 Supplemental District
Regulations
Division 2.8 Architectural and Site
Design Standards and Guidelines for
Commercial Buildings and Projects
Capital Improvement Plan
The entry/exit gateway features,
landscaping, directional signage, and
lighting elements will occur within the
public rights-of-way. The implementation
mechanism for these projects will be the
county's Capital Improvement Plan (CIP).
Each element will have to be prioritized in
the CIP with an identified funding source.
In addition to local funding sources, such
as general revenues and roadway
revenues, Collier County should explore
other applicable opportunities such as the
Florida Highway Beautification Grant
Program and Transportation Enhancement
Activities.
Land Development Code
Amendments
When establishing the study parameters,
the BCC decided that the IMP shall apply
to all undeveloped property within Activity
Center #9. The activity center contains
approved PUDs that are required to be
developed in accordance with cited
sections of the LDC (i.e., landscaping and
buffering, signage). Therefore, these
sections will need to be amended to
provide a directional link to the Activity
Center #9 zoning overlay district. LDC
sections that will need to be amended
include the following:
Activ/ty Center #9 Interchange Master Plan (iMP)
November2000 Section 5, Page I
WilspnMiller
I Introduction
2---Vision Statement
3
Design DevelOpment
1
4 Land Use & Transportation
$, Implementat~
A--FS
n Analyses
8Al~
APPENDIX A
FSUTMS MODEL PLOTS
8A1
8~
rSA 1
/
/
/
,0
8Al
'8A1
I Introduction
2--Vision Statement
3 ...... Design Development ,
4----Land Use & lransportation
f Implementat on Stra ~ ~.:!~' ...... '
~dix A-- -~Model Plots'-
on Analyses
"8A 1
Naples Fort Myers Sarasota Bradenton Tampa
www-w//sonm/lle~.com 800-649~4336
Tallahassee