Agenda 05/14/2019 Cedar Hammock Community Development District
Board of Supervisors
Norman Day,Chairman
Quentin Greeley,Vice Chairman Justin Faircloth,District Manager
Fred Bally,Assistant Secretary Dan Cox,District Counsel
John Martino,Assistant Secretary Sam Marshall,District Engineer
Gene T.Bolton,Assistant Secretary
Meeting Agenda
May 14,2019—2:00 p.m.
1. Roll Call
2. Approval of Agenda
3. Comments on Agenda Items
4. Fiscal Year 2020 Budget Public Hearing
A. Open the Public Hearing for Public Comment
B. Close the Public Hearing for Public Comment
C. Consideration of Resolution 2019-09, Adoption of the Budget for the
Fiscal Year
D. Consideration of Resolution 2019-10, Levy of Non-Ad Valorem
Assessments
5. Old Business
A. Bulkhead and Bridge Repair Replacement Bid Update
i. Cap Rock Bulkhead/Culvert Bridge Proposal by Kipp Schulties
ii. Bridging Solutions Review of Kipp Schulties Proposal
iii. Ingenium Review of Kipp Schulties Proposal
iv. Banks Engineering Email 4/30/19
B. Consideration of Resolution 2019-08, Imposition, Levy Collection and
Enforcement of Certain Non-Ad Valorem Special Assessment
6. New Business
7. Attorney's Report
A. Draft Letter to Master Association Regarding Use of District's Roadway
for Staging
8. Engineer's Report
A. New District Map Update
B. Cardno Quarter 1 2019 Report
II
Cedar Hammock CDD
May 14,2019
Page 2
C. Cardno Proposal for SFWMD Water Use Permit Renewal
9. Manager's Report
A. Approval of the Minutes of April 1, 2019 Bid Meeting
B. Approval of the Minutes of April 8, 2019 Meeting
C. Approval of the Minutes of April 11,2019 Continued Meeting
D. Approval of the Minutes of April 23,2019 Special meeting
E. Financial Report
F. Proposed FY2020 Meeting Schedule
G. Acceptance of the Financial Audit Report, September 2018
H. Report on the Number of Registered Voters(498)
I. Follow Up Items
10.Supervisors Requests
11.Audience Comments
12.Adjournment
District Office: Meeting Location:
5911 Country Lakes Drive Cedar Hammock Clubhouse
Fort Myers,Florida 8660 Cedar Hammock Boulevard
239-245-7118 Naples,Florida
www.CedarHammockCDD.com
1
Napirs BiaiL
NaplesNe s.con
Published Daily
Naples,FL 34110
Affidavit of Publication
State of Florida
Counties of Collier and Lee
Before the undersigned they serve as the authority, personally appeared Natalie Zollar who on oath says that she
serves as Inside Sales Manager of the Naples Daily News,a daily newspaper published at Naples,in Collier County,
Florida;distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida;that the attached copy of the advertising was published in
said newspaper on dates listed.Affiant further says that the said Naples Daily News is a newspaper published at Na-
ples,in said Collier County,Florida,and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said
Collier County,Florida;distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida,each day and has been entered as second
class mail matter at the post office in Naples,in said Collier County,Florida,for a period of one year next preceding
the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor
promised any person, or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this
advertisement for publication in the said newspaper.
Customer Ad Number Copyline P.O.#
CEDAR HAMMOCK COMMUNITY 2118983 Notice of Meetings C
Pub Dates
September 27,2018
/ th &
C. ��-e-*Z1
(Sign ture of affiant)
or:,.., KAROL E KANGAS
'S _,..:P,.;.,
4 Notary Public-SiateaiFlorlda I
dl '
Sworn to and subscribed before me CammhslonpGG 12(KWI
This September 28,2018 • '.f.t. >,`. MyCornm.Explra mi]9,7021 I
p 1 ''`P6anddlMc,ph MOO Way As
(., q CVYIer
(Signature of affiant)
Notice of Meetings
Cedar Hammock
Community Development
District
The Board of
Supervisors of the Cedar
Hammock Community
Development District will
hold their meetings for
Fiscal Year 2019 at the Cedar
Hammock Clubhouse, 8660
Cedar Hammock Boulevard,
Naples, Florida at 3:00 p.m.
on the second Monday of the
following months except as
noted:
October 8,2018
November 12,2018(at 1:00p.m.)
January 14,2019
February 11,2019
March 11,2019
April 8,2019
May 13,2019
There may be
occasions when one or more
Supervisors will participate
by telephone. Meetings may
be continued to a date and
time certain which will be
announced at the meeting.
In accordance
with the provisions of the
Americans with Disabilities
Act, any person requiring
special accommodations
at this meeting because
of a disability or physical
impairment should contact
the District Management
Company, Inframark,
Infrastructure Management
Services at (954) 603-0033.
If you are hearing or speech
impaired, please contact
the Florida Relay Service at
7-1-1 for aid in contacting the
District Office.
Each person who decides to
appeal any action taken at
these meetings is advised
that person will need a record
of the proceedings and that
accordingly, the person may
need to ensure that a verbatim
record of the proceedings is
made,including the testimony
and evidence upon which such
appeal is to be based.
Justin Faircloth
District Manager
September27,2018 No.2118983
Agenda Page 29
Forwarded message
From: Kipp Schulties <kschulties(;.gmail.com>
Date:Thu,Apr 18,2019 at 10:44 AM
Subject: Cedar Hammock alternative
To: Quentin Greeley<giereeley(ri)gmail.com>,Tom Read
<generalmanager.'cc cedarhammockcc.com>
CC: Lee Marshall<leemarshal100 a,amail.com>
Quentin and Tom-I spent about 4-5 hours trying to put together an alternative concept and price
this out.
I looked at it as addressing the current issues of wood replacement using more permanent
materials(stack rock and rip rap)while also improving the golf course in areas that would be
impacted by the wood bridge and bulkhead replacement project. I think you were probably
aware of most of what I might he suggesting per our meeting a week ago,but I did expand what I
was thinking on hole#5 to make it a better hole in the process that improves visibility as well as
access to the fairway.
You will need to zoom in on each of the pictures as they may be a little difficult to read as I have
simply "red-lined"the concept for each area over top of a black and white aerial crop from
Google Earth. I took a portion of the large waste area on#9 to serve as a borrow area and
surface water equator for the amount of lake filled in by the adjustments shown
In a nutshell,other than the bridges on holes 9 and 18,all wood will be replaced meaning that
you will save long term from having to re-deck or replace in the future(other than#9 and 18)
and the estimate(which is a little on the high side)is only about half the amount of what you are
considering currently with the vinyl sheet plies.
See information attached.
Kipp Schulties
Kipp Schulties
President
KS
Kipp Schulties Golf Design, Inc
123 Andros I[arbour Place
Iuptrer,H. 33458
561.626.7812(office)
561.373.1975(cell)
wvorylkgglif lcsign.corn
Agenda Page 30
Cedar Hammock
Preliminary Project Estimate
KIPP SCII111..TICS
Updated: April 18,2019
Hard Costs
Item ,Unit .. Scl1ed.4ed; Prolip. Projected Coat ,Com 3eted,
14 oloy*o < 1 LS $ - $ 25,000.00 1 $ 25,000.00 $ -
C4aiea$trlitoi Rurfat 10 AC 2,350.00 $ 23,500.00 10 $ 23,500.00 $ -
Gresns Mia Swage 0 CY 5.00 $ - 0 $ - $ -
C„ n Core tuts 0 CY 4.50 $ - 0 $ - $ -
Crx>faBte C:artbthe41q , ,„"' 2,750 LF 4.00 $ 11,000.00 2,750 $ 11,000.00 $ -
R0.0-.9 40.47 81y 0,44NO 3,020 LF 10.00 $ 30,200.00 3,020 $ 30,200.00 $ -
Itgahog* i040ri40537 LF 25.00 $ 13,425.00 537 $ 13,425.00 $ -
'rCeItenStn al' 11ft a[to 0 LS - $ - 0 $ - $ -
1'ree'
****0.010#101411V.:46.4 LS - $ 5,000.00 1 $ 5,000.00 $ -
13e-waterLtB7aAes 1 LS $ 35,000.00 1 $ 35,000.00
Aihiybv`1ng4itt atc¢ff„r!.iolt) 12,500 CY 4.75 $ 59,375.00 12,500 $ 59,375.00 $ -
I3attbmovin ocic>txcev"tTrk 10,000 CY' 7.00 $ 70,000.00 10,000 $ 70,000.00
I41#,US A, rplms,, 7 0 SF $ 5.00 $ - 0 $ - $ -
:1` 06tru ton 20,000 SF $ 0.50 $ 10,000.00 20,000 $ 10,000.00 $ -
1`Iet9SandBu►Ycers 5,000 SF $ 3.50 $ 17,500.00 5,000 $ 17,500.00 $ -
04AgrinENDARCM 1 LS $ - $ 15,000.(X) 1 $ 15,000.00 $ -
ti$lc l ltorkwtls/C`#Ivertsj 13,200 SF $ 40.00 $ 528,000.00 13,200 $ 528,000.00 $ -
V"saTodebw4,:*1,ti* 400 LF $ 6.00 $ 2,400.00 400 $ 2,400.00 $ -
6" olopth aYt bT 4Aptprs 2,000 LF $ 7.35 $ 14,700.00 2,000 $ 14,700.00 $ -
o9of:o thwafl f l2ggp gl 1,000 LF $ 9.50 $ 9,500.00 1,000 $ 9,500.00 $ -
"af 12L C 4114 li#}'plpe(k7} 180 LF $ 70.00 $ 12,600.00 180 $ 12,600.00 $ -
Sf u►W tpe #en$ riBZ #. 1 IS $ - $ 15,000.00 1 $ 15,000.00
r":0301(0.#74fI f1f t4I 8 Cl $ 325.00 $ 2,600.00 8 $ 2,600.00 $ -
1'2c1►$8geai� 6 CT $ 450.00 $ 2,700.00 6 $ 2,700.00 $ -
12tr
flcy1tet0itlYtlisBaejns 15 CT $ 500.00 $ 7,500.00 15 $ 7,500.00 $ -
Cotite4Cdi}ittNtp ,f a r v 3 CT $30,000.00 $ 90,000.00 3 $ 90,000.00 $ -
0,00:.110:1tl*400 1: 3 CT $ 5,000.00 $ 15,000.00 3 $ 15,000.00 $ -
irE3g$tliDlt Lltig4Ct j$lLtkattonj,.,! 1 LS $ - $ 150,000.00 1 $ 150,000.00 $ -
Ittpj p IttSta914Ho1$ �:.- 60,000 SF $ 6.50 $ 390,000,00 60,000 $ 390,000.00
rldg ,1330 CCklii**0.0t118j; 775 LF $ 500.00 $ 387,500.00 775 $ 387,500.00
0:00:140.tktgattr#10final 2,750 ).F $ 33.00 $ 90,750.00 2,750 $ 90,750.00 $ -
O'04i2t1C1lftit 2,000 LF $ 7.00 $ 14,000.00 2,000 $ 14,000.00 $ -
Cr**.t r000got.ttgzzm 7 AC $ 2,500.00 $ 17,500.00 7 $ 17,500.00 $ -
Grassing Tees(Celebration sprigs 0 SF $ 0.35 $ - 0 $ - $ -
celebr4tion,,5„od 175,000 SF $ 0.45 $ 78,750.00 175,000 $ 78,750.00 $ -
W40.gustineSod 30,000 SF $ 0.55 $ 16,500.00 30,000 $ 16,500.00
14 Sodt#1 , _ 8,000 SF $ 0.30 $ 2,400.00 8,000 $ 2,400.00
Travel teRestoratio} 1 LS $ - $ 25,000.00 1 $ 25,000.00 $ -
Sub•ToaI;.` $2187,400:,00 $,::.,E:; ,$'2,187,,400.00:$,,
Page 2
Cedar Hammock
Preliminary Project Estimate KIPP St.,,,,,T,fs
Others Fees and Project Costs
9.09gsign&PsojectMgmt 1 1 LS $ - $ 145,000.00 1 $ 145,000.00 $ -
Consultant enses 1 LS $ - $ 7,000.00 1 $ 7,000.00 $ -
SoilBoringe/;�lathymetricsurvey 1 Ls $ - $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $ -
Agenda Page 31
Engineering and?Omitting, 1 LS $ - $ 37,500.00 1 $ 37,500.00 $ -
Surveying(allocation) 1 LS $ - $ 7,500.00 1 $ 7,500.00 $ -
Iandscaping(allocation) 1 LS $ - $ 30,000.00 1 $ 30,000.00 $ -
GP$As-Builf(t pda(tey. 1 LS $ - $ 2,500.00 1 $ 2,500.00 $ -
irr gation Design - 1 LS $ - $ 10,000.00 1 $ 10,000.00 $ -
Coutin eucy(3°f t sub-total)`. 1 LS $ - $ 65,000.00 1 $ 65,000.00 $ -
$ 309,500.00 $ 309,500.00 $ -
PR eaio I; to t* 00 $ $ 2,,49490000 $
Note: Estimate does not consider any costs associated with short term closure of select holes during implemention of work
Note: Estimate assumes one construction period for all work-phasing of work may result in slightly increased pricing
Note: Rip Rap estimate from Ryangolf Corporation. Rock wall and bridge work estimate from Josh Collins(OCD inc)
Initial Thought: per the note above,implementation of this work might be best done in two phases;front nine
and then back nine or vice-versa
II.
1
3 see•
....•
-&-1-
a CPQorti
CD CD
QO 2
o
CD c
O � o a CD
3
Q.) n ca) 3
a. � CD O
-
O 0_
Di O C7
r C7
E g - O
I.
r ^if
r
'' V)
fi} 1:41,.";.:,-,': - ,''',
=<0
i V 1 F y - ' d
F yi
a ' 4 't I' ii$tyy s hr4} 3 kqi• s
r � �r1M1 1 I } � i1:14 .E'Y- s•
1,..,,iii.,,,. :.,, '-' i.:1:11!4.1.,,,.1.
..,...-1,)
rD
r 7 1 r ,167.,i, ._ rsr
'1'.!It { p!1 y' 10
_f
1, ' ,„. it'ti 1,t;p,,,,.., ,,i., i't•'•-'', ..,„', 1„,,,,,._ ..1- , !•1.4,...•;,-.. -.,,?:-•,.•s,),,,
l' ' 1'4 i it.' '.-11 l'i \1• ' 1•111P");''''
•
4-t,q
:',Ii't":-,,.,j',‘,1'1.,,11.,,I.i.1',).‘—.,!'f0 c,l'it
„
.-••i,;',11L',',!\.1,'',J,.1,'k,
,.‘‘`,1-'„','1'r'j'N,A„4,'Y
1 517 -
-,1'''.'',,,
ir k i •
1-1 �Ii M
1 ,4 { 1 I r i;ri t 6 � �.
i
' . 1'' ii.j if.:'''!;1,1:i',',11'1:tii.;3' '';i tt, 1, 't,:i.:14.:,
` ' : IM'i'i.). 't.'1,1. '''' ,„, ."--,, ,,.. ?,,.. i - -.,. ,,, t. -:2,,-' ...1 ,r, . ,., -.,,-.„: „,.,,,, r ,rr,r,,,,ri,,,,,,,t,.. ,, ,-'.'_:4,,.: ,..,,,, , , ,,- .,,,,i„, .., ,,,,,,,,,,, ,, :;.7.,:;,,,,,
iPlb 1
--t4iititl....:?--, '', ..,...,:-.',” ,._ ' ''''..!'..i.''.k:
k r � ,f,'1,,,,•,....•.•ii.e!'i• :: ,-,„ '
1 a ,r,ii't.1' , ....4„, ''” „I,- .„. ,i,-,, . , , „t:,...'::i-:':, V(3)
G
! a.1 lii ; II
,,,„f‘,,,,,,,,kiwitt r ., . ,, ,„ ,,,,,,,...4,,,,..,,,...,,,,,,,
i, / r
_ I ° 1' {
yy
r � 1y� 1 ..�.
i lri 5d M�1I i ,11 1
,•:•''''t.-4-;;'.-1.-„,
Ci
t .iK
. ,. .,,,.,;:.:'-';.: '. : : 1.4<6
Dm
ft
icti --
,1451,1
•-•;*4toil,,v1:''''::1'*:':7":‘
tv-i*"i
a d
�° � �'�'� cv ''�` �r � � I'Hi7 -
� �� w i �� 1. I
4 kz �e of
it
1 ,-,.�, � } ISS
.1-4$1.. - gs [ �` sin
t� I p
f.t
'sd Fi111,111.1 .,.,.
I 'a 4�." iS
r - �x�
it;"1"g)1"''..4-;;;'%:/%14V11;40114.1!":' 'tit'*
3 s F l
it 11
F1 r m, S .L.
fiti
f�
a
{ W � �$ '
t,
---,
' etir,Ilir,l'-'-''''
e'` ... 'i ,if_ �� ' ,i::,,,-,,...;,_,i.
. r.
21 �. "f1,41.,,,,,„ >�
Tib ra (' '
11
,I f, it',14i,', V',II'ti.
t ,$ ,
--'• <
`N 0, '''',:'''.A,,, '1 1 ,„- ,., ,
..t 1
\,,,,-,,,,‘;‘4..,,,r i
-- 11;.
�I .1i V
. i , ,' . s
11 � > iti1 r, t , r
:lia.
HI e''' <a
„ \ ,
,, .
i, 1 �'�' �'.!1 1 i (D
I. $ t (Prf��
I, • (,�1 I ��;y6 ��
y �
ili
E
MIIIIIMEN
. , 1'}1 ' I.. ,, 1 1 t i k liG �!(,r , i r ! .I_.
1 }-i i 111 �'� I , �� � air =NM II
,11� 1 '4 1I iL Mliilr',-if: 41 1::,
! r is ra}
ll I
, k** I • : .., .-' Crg
ti �° hill itI)ii iii,` ��
,1 •' ) I , ' ill i ii
I f ., . 4.: , , '..1,.,,t,' . -:'e ,r.,::'-i,,'' '':'TAP": ' •
f f I i I f!'f ikiy fi 414 ,i'.'-ii.:
x$t0 ^
" i : if ,f tl ', .(1
1,, sH
'1 I .f r ui .,�s G13'A
�Ifi: =
li Iti;tiftli, ' i III,-
iii11 f ; '' ;'� ti;. I ; / 1,4 . ., ( ,• .',It .iii
i1 +1i4
{' I f+ f I4�i'ir� ���
�I !f ,+ di ( i� .., _now
1 II7 !( :hr
17■ 11 f i ill
i i��-i I�11 Sf�;�1i r1� r �?��yx�, �'
lir
Ill I1"' fII '''-iI,
1 ill I11 -11,P2.11..I ' tf,
¢ N
41 <
11, I ax
P'`r fig& ;f �e ` i'- "`-az•
•
nF s "- y
1.
■ 5.,.',•.4.F.,::!* • dt• _, . rD
Jf'1,;',-,!,,A.t ��fifi ` $1 C. _
'..-,,;':,-,1,-._-: ]n S { 1•? 9
## @ .b
§dt 2y '„kit y ,
i:',-:::::;: iiiii.4„:::;',41Ps,-;,T,'
" ' ,, • 't '
,. ¢ f
•
•�rlf 4•f-"� Ivt ,4 } r f{tii$4s ; y2j _
y st
ply g � �� - i
�'' tIS �; ta •
r ,o�
::„,„:„.„, , .
, ,),,
,.,,,,-,.,,,,,,„r;�: :, :: # til f
1„:„.„,,� „ ,
i t ,fit�, s e ,� it' {
� P' 1,7_ , r V
eilliii,..„,,,,,..'',: ''---14ri•'-t'k\ '-
W4''-,-Al, '',4.''•,i,f::/.i
'',itti_4,1••14.-'4 q • I. 't •:::044.4t,:• *,,-..•,-,‘,•,f,t‘•-,.,.,..1,
„,,,-,,A.,,,,,:r.t.,11-.
Orr I t , a � x
-!:,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,wo.,,,,,;ir
.,,..: 0,,40,,,..4., „el,
.:14p......„,.._; :. fil
.i.:„.,.::,, . ...13.'' rmt,..,
„--•,,11,:i
�¢ i 4
:iyi,,,, (� f 11.P. ':_ '"` V r " {r - ;�
' ,
g �' l f fait.1.j filet� �'I
� •
�
o
��
« �-
9
g FL
CDw
y jr rD
�'
,+s. Ab,
Ab i, r<,a r� i
4.
t 1 4‘. O'CI
; '4,_
I
lit
L0 '
� � 4 .5
t�� �♦ri�,
j` r ,
I
I_
40
V
3 y. 0
7� .� arm _
,e, 1 f 4,„. i., i )1
iittw
Ni
$ a
j �, * .�
a
iirif
' 's
liki
F .t � i
DK •
, IttIl --;2:;:i41. .'-';1_;:',''''. .- if' . -:1'-2-::, 'c-It—i. ii..:'' ''T'*'I'l'''''*''' ''."
Dm
•
el-
,. t.l.: .'. t' j L.1 it 1li
_ '2:,'
� s ,: ate, u.- .
..„!!!!.:7':-z " .. .
w
p,
2`` . r' 2'u ¢ Lg
k.. 1
:; Y iE ,, L,-,-,,,....,...,,, -.,-41,--,i 0,rtemvx, . , ,:,:,',':::',.,5,g,,,',...:,,,,,•",;:,: ,,, ,,, ,.
,Y,,,Ii:Fil',,.' .,' ','!Sr41,. .,!,A'''':', 2'‘'',1' ' . 41 : ' :- '::,:'%','"i5-:'''l':','":::: ::,5 .','1."..3.. ':: rE)
�r
. ,..- t*,,,s,=;,:„..,.. , 4.- ,- ,4,44p,17.,4," --,:,.. -'.-"'-,,-.:"-.:-:2::::;;:-. ;;- : ,-',7- w--Y,i'-'' .4"vs.lAY'''fi:-.,,iki
Vk:y i ' "' .
a
{
$i
ier 01.11101
\C)7..".../ 1
Tv ,,,-\
�_
Oy
bgo y
. � A
A r k
S n (1.!_,---
\
o
\ 11 o
� � �, %h
X1
� � 1
.\ eNO
a
„
ISM
Z
•-• _
r tri
. ,--
az
I •
...,.. ., k
... N O O i �} -d h 1 N -O
�
t . i1 O
O 35.
CV
..•• 1000►iv ���.' lb`s �►
i1� , _I\ . 0
ourii, ticcp
72<
. < 076 �1
MI
ural 44 4.ypy � ti N. K i tl
O 4 L' , ••. X a Q~ ro
1 .F roli)
� : A �t V A i +� 'gyros
V ', ^ VI f
,.} , 3.` -13
4-
--I N , Z A
V1 v 3
1\---
,
rn
•
I . •
%) O 0)
I •A p c,
-4 S CI
a tn 1C)
a —• o � VC)
Ci) CI" Ca) CO CIA 0
ct- 5 .Z. 0- 0
"a:. .c -% 5 ‘
a) 5 eld 0/
a CfQ
0 CIO
et Ms
5 �% a til
cpc, r; n
V
00- CPS
G
to (D
CD
5% 0)
0- 00
SCD
tn
!,,,,,.,,,,,::,,•,:._,,,,,,, . )
t �^„u� .
. f ri
$,,� .k ...s02 yyII,, sY x�
c .',`..4';'40,."'"!"-',1;'''',14-:-..,,,",!...",.="'i4,: ,�1
70
0
' yr s - `'
::.....,:-Af-4A,..Is,:ii;-;-:::::, .::. 4.,it::.;:„; X.
,,,=t, n
a ,,f3 '' , s
I
V:ff s -
,Ms F,� `' '44.
�^ 3 � f. s a' I
it
,r ', t � "' ,,,,,...;::,./„..:'t'',.!,,,-,-.'".=9 '' ,
# rx ''F ......#
'*€ lam' a
0', r -° `' ' ,k
six < h:4y !
�t '�i:' 7`t is Y
iii,
1
'1'"i'.'-' � Cli
€ ,5., t_?.:222 _ �.
,r ,� .. s yr �� '?' r , : , :.,•
.1#
CL
s
aswwix . 0
it 4t
,,,555,,, 3
��
6 s tea'.
a3 ��
CU
4s r
s
� Y ,-
�„ .„ �� � -:--,,,„-,40:•',.,„(14,; •';',--!--..
���, >��.,. 4vim. �^i.
2'' *t° � nay--,
4340
II
,, "tl* 'AT‘',,,,,,.1.,;(i.i.'::14''''4,•': 1 '- :,s..,,,":4,7%,::::147:,:‘,. ''
"'
x
.11-
Iiii
sIro'fic,la,
pa . °
�' ` D
xii V
r
' ^
.z,,
V ,
Di
# F
,'• n
,1 ____ _ , ,,,,,%4-:-1/4-
',"".."--;' , i ''. '''',' -
''• ?gin f. > %Y 419. E f s.
a O
"�j `.'",:, s a 434 '
1 ._._":447P'4"'P•4'''::s:";t''Ax'' iii<
MIMI
ya r � t t i z';�4
. 'i 4 .4 ii li'''., ' : ".<,-`,,:';',0-.1.,;-, ,,,t,':,., n
_,_.1t.,„.„ . ?y ,. , _ , :is,4„:„.?,,,,,,4,..„3
......,,,,,,i}fi„ ,, ,. ,..,.....„,:zt,,.,..:-0t:::. .........,
., .. .., ,,_,,i1. ,..4.4.
,._:-.,,,,::1;,...4 .
S
4
U.
5, .T. C:,,..
n
x9
70
ts • a� . .Y -'
' I
t-a
I1 1 a
3� ti � y
y
..�: Aid
° sir,:
MOIMMEMM
Nimmi
ill )am, ; ��+0 �My
e.,,,;„4.ct . O
w' � - t4
saz
Y 7; m ' • '
moi
'
�'�'` commis■t`'�A "74xn 74'.2 �" ,., n + _ '. 4� -'v 4. r.:. ir g #
e
.+are a�
z4:..::,....,i„....,,..."44,:;.:',.„1.3. '.;1:'' ' ''=,2 4,X4$ 1;a"r ^
Vit, �* xlit a .�
�bi._
C
� ,
g . 1<. ,h-r d aC8�F ,may S ,�-�f
. ' : ':'.V-'''.-44.-'1-1VT.,'X'''ili -4.'1
4 }�i f Y
4
)t.
L
5 .t117;` � .r ",>7 x� -‘,...1.',,...-.,,,";;;:e4,117-'„'..'s,
� wu � �aka �"
x .1 �� •D )
S� 4' 4g ay , £vl
,44,-,:i-;.': +3��P �3 "' #"
#£ � rh
.). 'f' �rit ^v.t ' 70
tt-,
kms`
t
0' ,. � r ,to t v,
‘t,
,)
. 4 t - fi i 1 I
li
s
g, '� ''
Ill
11
' ::-. '..':',.. :".7. .-k4:.:til,lif,4,-,-,,i.,,,.1...:;:f.-itt),,ii, 4 ,.'''t,,,,.,::".'''::..11 k.:I':i' 7 1:'
£• � •
- " ,•f -� z ( /�
a r" • V
,,,-c.,'',...-,::: i.4..•,.'
a
111',
r)
3
r
�� 3` ;s 1 , i a * N.- .` - F." a
- ." 3 t g1". ;f v « 4 � .. a ,^a 3:.
ae s x:e` N E mf
"01.045:V&""):4-3..17".5.1
,� -5 '�,- ,va 2 ,-;•-?;„'....,Ci
.:' ..,,!'.:.,:-,4.--4;--"',- ri' -. ^5�... 4 ze£.x .a$ .E '- ..ham' .e.. 'x : �°v�.
,.„0„
. ,,,,. . .,:::\i.;4„,,,,,10 ....,..
ril,,,..„..,...„,,,,,„,,,.?:. ...,vra„.;:.,,.„..,,,.:,:.,c.,:.•.:4'. - ' ' ''' r't
11)
I ;.
� 'iI L ( s
70 1
�� I
rr,! � 0
iti
r
aml
t3rD
'.1tiid`s`
.";
ax
x
x
D
�i . ,, .,.
0 Z ' �.
ti "
. iki- i.? ''-':','..4.-:,-. 2,-,:,...-:;' i-' -' :-„4-,- - '''''" ..,'6,:...,.'
(-)
, _ ,,,,,,...,i,-..:i„:„.„, ,,,,.„..#;,,,...,„....f,to,..,,,,.... ........., ,., „'. -, r , :.,5-;:':.':',:.'t?.i'.-::e--:,oa,i.i7-,l,iAt--rtkf.,44V.-:'-i4''r.,.,
„:.'`,,7,,
V va
2,
7
S s.
CCTi.
`,div >t .�-fin -8 °a ,ra
: _ ,
, ..
..„,.. .„•-•,,„ ':, .
„ ,...„ tt.....„..
....0,-.4,:s.,
_ ,:t
+ # e r' .,
-
..
cii
,r. f X3�;-�t $ � 0
�� �Y��Y"�” �..a'E"�'��: FN 3�I �P�" �.
D
70
:i,,,,i7v,,t1:,•:-' !',.t.; .:' , 1 :: :-.4'..„,_,t,,..%., ". ' . .,4, '
S 2 ? Y as :. t. e. IgA '
f
���
•r""
�%n. y��a4 � c .� f� 'fir: `�
'u. 'd >�',y �' yyF fig. Y
5 Q '��-,-,4,,,,1---„ � � 33. p� h{{
c.. , r` d •
iw
_..t ' '!# may; � �,,. '-�. ' _ t
CU:; f.„:„„,•„„. „.,.„ , 1,' . '
° is i si-� _
•' •,„,„.... ,,,, . , „•• _
.... .„ ,,, ,_ g ..,:ii:.,'
.••.
...,,
, ...„.,„,..„ .. .,,,,, , , ,
,,,,,,„,,,,„ ., ,,,'AA 'f '4 ' : ..,.,.... f
iF• �, "�ut h,,:,1„.:.„,.::„,,, , 1 ..,,,,,: . ,., , i
V- ' S � .�.y r'ti'S 4
C7 t
.15
.•'-':,.!1-411. :,
�,a`y� l.fi. A$
x
..• ,•,:,,......„...„,„.* __ _f:''s'',...:4,,,, ,,',....•''':
, „-i.....,,:,-,.,,,:tw,?3,,,,--,4*-1, ,,,,•; ,,.,:;•,z;5-A-7„,..„,- ..4t-„,„ „.„, ,....
p
. . ,,,„. _, ..
„- . „, , 4:: .,.,,,,,,4.,,,•4„.1„,•„:„:„.a. . .4. ,
�� , - .--- ,
�
. . ., ,...
i
4
-
4
r),.,,,,..,. .,..,..,, 4 - 4-.w... .
.,. .. .> a ? CU
O
9 :- - -0
a ;-" k's ` r _
li
Imi
flu ' " � S. � C I
T x " d ,
I
re)
,-(44 - .';' ,;:„.t, ,v,,a.i.:1-;.:,,,,,i,,,,,,,,.,:w.,-,,,,,,,!---,5.,:,.:,„:4; -,., i:Jii.
YT
Y+G yx �7+
t � `• g$ �c + '1AzrD
,' r.a kis ay D C
- ' *k
i
, ' ; O V •
5 �
Li s '%` X 94.. a.`. a cp
1 ':
f rks"Cswu k.
as
s
si '.a3w- t3 •-` •
1 '`-
y_ £ "'ASN ''''":
+r g
,4,,,4,,‘,._ r..,);1.‘„).„
Itt
ti,,, ,t. ,
R
....,i4.. ,,
4., ,:ti:
_,I,. „.,1104
'11: , ( lif.. . - '-'-'.',-, 'i',..i. -
'mss
-r..r,:1'1! r . '.'.''''-'--;'..i.'''..:,. '. .-'''-' "'''' ..':' ';',,-,!'',I7iga- .
if
e 8 �f �.Y� fi=t E$ $ ' .'�V
p ,' ai r; ., ¢ � F
•n
70
j y" i ,. O
=..-4.'
,': t t.:
::'', -'
i4:.r.:i:'''. 41-,''',..,:.4 '`,,1: ,.:,
I.. ,4-re# s „.1!tiff:a 7t. F .,ate € a1 n .
0 1''''kii.:4V'''',';''
il
; % ,> F ' "�, s ;„ {
'� ,, .::. ;";5‘,,,,..'"'
' .„ r:,i.: 1' may', ;t„," e
a i -#
n` � Ra:7,1i # *�µY� � � �"a � iii
{{ &F f
I w f F .I'i'
g 6'� '''• € .S. ''..`;;..,Y3,,. ...;
s
E ,' h 3 "ti ice'.
i y
-. F pit i i_ ,.% 2 6 $ a '
xf 1 .
„ ,
4-,.,-;:,,,-A''4,:zik,:,'-';„-, , 14, :4149,,i,,,,Itt.,:i.,...,!:,:.i
, ,i
- .
(0-4)
tix�i 4
3 x a
0
t T�J
.,;'''„,-•.J"-Ll',,''T_;41.4 X 4Y,:gli-l'I-- ' q -S,,, .
,.. ,,,, :.,, :.
. . . ,. .,._,I,,.., „.4.
Y yy Srl.
f. L'i' t` C� '' aF� „, 1i :,„ t 1
ri)
-1..v
F ::-',
A K
tt
a„ } �, ? _ � 4 vin` 5`� '^y' : . ..
,,,,,,,,,-..,-„,`„it.'",..-
, f y-4-'-h
� y a te'. -h ,} 4 ., .
14'till
I it 44 tr,'.'-.
:
1a ',,
141<
” '�,.-'i ax S i'1'-'''.:i..$ 4 q -� 1%'',,;:''.`",:'4-47::..!,
R SS
� � �� ' i� � 2�t � �' �x'34 � � � � � 4 `` `b �.t -,-.i.7�
..0,:.:,,,,,.::;., ::::',:p„.:::/,;‘.4,itil",iilk,!: _,,-. ! , ,..'r II,
:4 z
k" 'J'''''';'''.; --lpf-41'1'4r",
t:44. 5 � i 5
i, f.
��`r tAtif*Igo - _- A V' s a _ -4
ra a 4p \ V
'fib'€ `s : , y"'�'�3'€ fr,.ms f w"
'f div 1 - , .
:',44,7,4'%1,-,4,::`, s , , ..r a0. '
pottki,14141,
' 'fi s �_ I
��
z>� ,S-t' i �`" s� w 'e '"
•
•
CSQ
6 n
o (to
o u,
J
o•
kfl
¢ CD
0)
1
••
• • rn
n
r . .
O O55.
r r o --s-
�► 5• to �,
°
G a) O 11
CIO , O• G 1
O °- -L 0--,a; 0_ tA.1 0_ -% O ..-•
ci) (1° S 'A .z.
. . s n (D CD .
....--
u, O O-° -t - UI
O Q- OG ti
;,. et CD
,c) 0 .0 a (1.2 t v
—% SI 1:3 0 -0
•
O ° O A>
(toCD ,r,
O
0 O- co
p• ..4+ v�
0 CD
O
Q- S tP
`r% o
0 ot:1- 0
CD o
et
0
• • • • •
I I I O� E re",-; * S--'-c'
751 0 DO r+ O S.)
CD
Co v) -•
3ro 3 ? < 3
Z".3 cucu 2 c -0 .
Ocrq n -0 n C =
C _• O O O vi
n3 (D 5
= cCM CD( . 0
cm -1 O CD
Q.
ca_ a) 0, ---. — =. a)
e+ • O
rD O "0
CM M
CD cu 3 CSD cn
S XI
o V, 0
ma CD rD m rD 0- X.
—•
St4 (ACD e-t•
C CD 0 V) CO
= O O M
V) n D -.
C CD 7.r-P:
rD ,.<
�-- n
D-
rD
-o
rD
^� e � r „,;-_,-,',„-1,,,,,, fi„ :
ns ,: _ '`
� �� � � �«+r.,•-;+.--‘,-� � !x '.3^y'4o; 4'iez v "h .4e",p''''''c s�.y,"1” r4.�-.,.-;" � '
H
,,,,„..t.,,,,,,,,,„
,
.� ,. ‘ arm ,� �... 4` , a
,x 4 . _ � t
n
::, ::
1
Ilit
Ai
# A
u
:074‘ --A, - _ .-.,.. "4i,-,.'', '2. •-•‘.' ' '-,4- .*:
a
,4sw
.,.. -.. -
�,..
1 i :
rt
) 4#'
l• I. i
Vi':µ_
a»te. .' ' a,
,3:::-.C.z.. ,. gzz, .
'AZ:- ..n.. �a�ti~a. `:4=.,+ �as«�. "".'1.4'•!'..:".'"'f.,,,:•:,...,....!;,‘,..„...:,
tm� to
r
J
ot.tilt5;;zlr4ift,'',!„.it:;„;:;''L::::''"&r'
17- .
,, ..
.._,,,,,,,,8„, ..,,,,„„ 4," '‘.-. '.y.\
fr� r
c " '
azF
a
* ...., "
4 ,kt"
3
� T
.41
y
i
1
..x .,�s� .-:''--;.•a., ...4 ' r,*'�.'R
...
.� tea, e .s ... s Cy -
4
n a.- 1
r
h
i.c
; #`3.°3, s. t
6 '�`�„ �`
'�£'i f i;:-"-':
.r 1 .mom
K y
1
e ,
a,
':. '4:11,..i,,,,::::,,,,',,,',i,,:.,.:
4,i,'„:::,,,,,f:j2:1:',:., 4.i.:..,'•:•,.-'',.,,.:.,:,,,,::',',..,'.,,.::;:1-
.
,,,, i
- ito...10,1
iiilik
s -
r x
m
6
•,,1,4 *
,c,•.
'"'�,.�A.7 . d^ ,r"
.
2
'' '.:.:.-..4i.4,:_:"....,•,...1-.:;.::::: ....,.,:,,, ;;;41,,,,,,41. , :*,..,‘,„.,,,,,g,,,::,-,:il--i-
r
I,.
ti
' @ �'s
th
1 hi
�� "
f
1
-L
I
r
$ '_. � E ` ''.''''.Z' a _, ,�E
. ' :-. ',', ,,, l'.''''''''14 ' '.,' .;,,;',''‘' 111,4,:ft it '* „eis..'''',7714,-.:.1;--; '.
2," t yffu' 5„" ^ y` yamy „iret. '''
, ., ,1 ,i ,,,,,,,,,:i!' :i...,.8:251, '' ,::,,I ''.''-''-' ,,,„4.,t,::,,',:',,?:.,s,,14::' bu''''',31 ,,. ; .. ,,,,, ,,,,,,,-;,,
�-�_ `
,
-,,,..: .,:e.-...'z',;.. -ilitH''''--. .
_n.f .^' ,o..4 . 3 " em7. " .v A
37„.,74.,„3,;..44.:±.:,:,; LRc„ .uR .Qh $
Y i ' Pf ' 7d .n
4
k
-Ail: •
�� a i
I 0 Y
.. A 7 '-„•,,,, '''', *,..a. ' 4r?k‘-',',',47.,,,::. t.:!::4 t
St'''' h 4".f 4 ,-,,,,%L
, ':
Y fii A - 'i t 7 `S 9
!►t Vis.
�` to R
t.;.1..f,, ..
—'".444t*-4"-
/ ' tr
so
i
}
x (
3:4
r
H
a..
A
4 s
j
f.
41
if
i 4
...
n. ,.., .
S.
t
E
ft 1z
F •
l:,
Agenda Page 40
From: Ralph Verrastro [mailto:raiph@bridging-solutions.corn]
Sent:Monday, May 6,2019 10:29 AM
To:Faircloth,Justin<Justin.Faircloth@inframark.com>
Cc:Rolando Corsa<rolando@bridging-solutions.com>; Gina Verrastro<gina@bridging-solutions.com>;
smarshall@bankseng.com;Norman Day<ndav@cedarhammockcdd.com>
Subject:Re: Preliminary Project Estimate for Cedar Hammock CDD Bulkheads&Bridges Project
Justin,
Received,thank you.
Below are the comments we provided in a previous email.
Do you have any specific questions on this that you would like me to expand on?
Do you want me to attend the meeting?If so,what time?
I would be interested to know why Kipp prefers the rock walls versus concrete gravity block
walls which are readily available and would likely cost the same or less. Is it aesthetics?I
attached copies of a couple of concrete wall brochures for the Board's information. Now that the
Board is considering reconstruction of the course,they may want to consider these more
conventional engineered wall systems.
We reviewed the conceptual plans and conceptual wall design section and offer the following
comments/questions.
1. The bottom of the rock walls should be embedded preferably 2 feet below existing
grade not perched on existing ground as shown on the sketch. Some of this excavation
will be in soil and some of it will be rock in other areas. If rock is prevalent,pinning
the bottom rock to the bed rock using steel rods could be considered.
2. The base rock should he set on some type of bedding. #57 stone would be preferred.
3. The wall heights would he between 8 and 10 feet high and the design would be based
on a gravity wall analysis. See the attached gravity wall design summary we prepared
for a preliminary design from another project. The base rock would need to be at least
6 feet wide if the all is 9 feet high. For the wall to act as an integral mass, the rocks
would need to fit tightly together with minimal gaps or concrete should be used to fill
the gaps.
4. What is the proposed batter on the front face of the wall? The larger the batter the
better for stability but as the batter gels larger the course impacts increase.
5. I have seen this type of wall used for 4 or 5 feet high walls and the rocks are 4 feet
wide. Has Kipp seen 10 foot high walls done like this?
6. What size rocks are available?
7. Where are the sources of this material?
S. Will the contractor need to modify(cut)some of the rocks in the field to make them fit?
9. How much will the rocks vary in appearance?
it
Agenda Page 41
10.How flat are the rocks?If they are not flat, the filter fabric would be spanning the gaps
and eventually the material will deteriorate and the backfill would come through the
gaps and the ground behind the wall would settle. Concrete could be used to fill these
gaps but using concrete could get expensive and difficult to manage in the field.
Perhaps concrete filled bags would be the way to go for this issue.
11.It appears this proposal includes the full removal of the existing timber walls and
installing new rock walls in the same footprint. However, the foot print of the new rock
walls would be at least 6 feet wide at the base and the existing wall foot print is only
about 2 feet. Will the front face of the rock at the base line up with the piles in the
existing walls?If so, the excavation for the new walls will require damaging at least 20
to 25 feet of the golf course.
12. The$40 PSF estimate for wall construction appears low.
13. What is the cost of the rock material delivered to the site?
14. The$25 PLF removal costs for the timber bridges is low. The removal costs from the
recent bids varied between$60 to$100 PLF.
15. To replace the bridges it appears Kipp is suggesting the construction of a filled
causeway supported on both sides by rock walls with culvert pipes going through
transversely to maintain the lake levels. The depth of the lakes at Bridges 4, 5 and 5A
are up to 15 feet deep.A gravity wall 15 feet high would need a base that is 9 feet wide.
$40 PSF is definitely low for a wall of this size.
Ralph Verrastro,PE
Principal
ati SOLUTIONS
Bridging Solutions,LLC
15863 Secoya Reserve Circle
Naples,FL 34110
Phone: 239-216-1370
ralph(a bridging-solutions.com
www.bridging-solutions.com
0 0 0 u
-,7, '''.
a x " s
a xF "@
,„ xto, 41' -„
a
61 '. t-,* 0-'4* ,7 . -
,..,:t-LIF, -,t .1-1' '-.1.i.,.. .'
11,
ti,.5:, , , ,,,,„,,,,,,„ ;
,..,,
,,,,,.„.-4,.., ,„
�`� c^ ,''`5 its.
,.. ,,,,, r- i
, ,, v ,„,.. 1 ,
.. ,_ ,,,,,,it, ,.... , , ,,t
-.- ':( L da
it
k
fi
i dr'"
'�
e
7`!;mts,
'p
!it-,.„- 40 litl., '''''
''''; ' `- '',*itx ,- t
,,,,,„ ,- tai.,: -.,_ ,,„ 7 lk ,
Vit
,,
i -
t.t` 3 ' $
e: s:
9! :M
YY3Ycr � F
/
"4 Y
1.7.%.zr,zr....:.d- , -
‘,.
APA.W
� 1it YbR6fa
� Y!
r Ya a k"„
,.
.„, v
,,,,.
,.. ,
ro p
CI 4
r, .
, **,,
,* .,
, , ,,.
,` s _ vd>Ai III
ANCHOR" Vertica '
BUILD SOMETHING BEAUTIFUL ATTACHMENT 3 RETAINING WALL SYSTEM
PRODUCT INFORMATION
ry1
r dour+--- �<ti.
lie ' - '
iiii
Pa 81
3 }}`�E� �k�2d�� �,y,�'4 i Y' : _ 1� �� I iya Y ,# ....w,�.
N S T § ``ggS bf
rit +Afr rynnS1 ��¢ 4' ➢ :'" -:', �- i* _ .3"2
1 . .. 1 II II 1 4 '
'
_ �/4?- t
,fil'A=1" ..---
w
- m
�4l �
wy
tau w.s'" � � �4
Designed for steep,sloping hillsides and other structural ,<. • - ' -„ ' `"' '
challenges,the Vertica'retaining wall system can be built to ,® m
virtually any height in incredibly tight spaces-thanks to an -,!,:i;',4111 '4'''''"'41-,,,i-r1,144,7!
impressive 2-degree batter,built-in lug locators,and a nearly a. 3, , ,,
vertical rise for less excavation and land loss.Typically used F'I
ri
with geosynthetic reinforcement,Vertica blocks meet or 'i '
exceed industry standards for strength and durability. �� '
•
•Pinless,patented locator lug gives quick,uniform setback for . . ,, r.
reduced labor costs ,
• Used in commercial-site development or anywhere space is
ata premium
• Features warm earth-tone colors and rugged,
rock-like texture
• Can be used to build gravity walls up to 3 feet 4 inches high,
including buried course,but excluding the cap`
•Taller walls can be built using geosynthetic reinforcement or I '
the Anchorp lex'"retaining wall system when designed by a
qualified engineer '`
• Minimum outside radius,measured on the top course to the `
front of the units:5 feet '1!.k.'*-.7.'....:-..;' _ - _
• Minimum inside radius,measured on the base course to the
front of the units:7 feet
This height assumes insets are filled with drainage aggregate,level backfill and clean, ��
compacted sand or gravel and no surcharge.
Vertica`p
RETAINING WALL SYSTEM
PRODUCT INFORMATION
z
w
x
, a d, !
4 a' .Sk i �. '� F` 'ga-;,„t,,,,‘,,.-,'„..e.,-1..0'.,,,.,,,: ,„w-V'•!,4„.,-.1.-
�' 3s .`i�°! j ��
.iM
S f, ' ` > ,k45, .,' »� * T N a Rya
r ii �— !ri li<ilfa'11f►..
4
r
a sA x; .41-., �� 16 o
`.5 5. d L E G aF#Mat . 4,.....,...„
1 !
2 ' ,, :. S' .T,� ' der
� a r � �, '"�,. .•.mss
•
_ �. k. '�
I '.1!..t.=-4"4.*0441.0,k7",gm''44-i..-",='.:-,':' - = :
aV , • '
,„ .44•:;-;:,,,,'--7, - - -,_,,,,,.....,
•, fi
•
.
Stretcher Units Straight Face Beveled Face
Approximate Dimensions' 8'x 18"x 11" 8"x 18"x 11"
Approximate Weight• 81 lbs. 78 lbs. Visit anchorwall.com for
Coverage 1.00 sq.ft. 1.00 sq.ft. installation instructions.
Setback/System Batter 9/32"/2° 9/32'%2°
'Product dimensions are height by face length by depth.
Actual dimensions and weights may vary from these
approximate values due to variations in manufacturing
+� �' ..At'
processes.Specifications may change without notice.See
r ° ' :i's `,...-.'4.;.., your Anchor representative for details,color options,block
t:ykM S ' 1dimensions and additional information.
5 2011 Anchor Wall Systems,Inc The Vertica'wall system
Accessory Units Cap Corner s manufactured under license from Anchor Wall Systems,
Approximate Dimensions' Front,4"x 1T/e"x 10'/a" 8"x 18"x 9" no.(AWS).the"Anchor A"and"Anchor Build Something
PP Beautiful"logos"Anchorplex"and"Vertices"are trademarks of
Back,4"x 12"x 103/s" 8'x 18"x 9" AWS.The wall system bloc s are covered by the AWS Limited
Approximate Weight*
41 lbs 101 lbs. Warranty.For a complete copy,visit your local dealer or see ,
anchorwall.com.
Coverage 122 lin.ft. 1.50 sq.ft.
Anchor Wall Systems,Inc.,5959 Baker Road,
A&60810 /3.3005.1 08/11 4015 Suite 390.Minnetonka,MN 55345.
ANCHOR''
BUILD SOMETHING BEAUTIFUL
Agenda Page 46
From:Carl Hazenberg[mailto:Hazenberggeverlastseawalls.com]
Sent: Monday,April 29,2019 5:01 PM
To: Sam Marshall<SMarshall@BanksEng.com>
Cc: Faircloth,Justin<Justin.Faircloth(c)inframark.com>;Norman Day
<nday.c,cedarhammockcdd.com>
Subject: FW:Preliminary Project Estimate for Cedar Hammock CDD Bulkheads&Bridges
Project
I have reviewed the preliminary estimate from Kipp Schulties. A few questions come to mind.
They have an item in the estimate for removal of existing walls. How do they plan on doing this
without significantly disturbing the course? Are they estimating a partial removal(say top 2'
feet of existing walls)?
Also,their stacked rock wall item for 13,200 SF@$40/SF—what design is this predicated on?I
only saw a rough conceptual drawing that did not include limits of the rock. Rock wall would
effectively be a gravity structure. To generate gravity mass. width of section would need to be
taken into account and its footprint impact. What wall embedment(bottom of wall) below
finished grade was this based? Are stones interlocking,mortared,pinned,etc.? What ties them
together?
Also, it's difficult to read notes in red written on the aerial photos.
Carl A. Hazenberg, P.E.
Ingenium, Inc.
President/Chief Engineer
678.315.1751
.: ngenIum, Inc.
Agenda Page 48
From: Sam Marshall [mailto:SMarshallBanksEna.com]
Sent: Tuesday,April 30,2019 6:03 PM
To: Ralph Verrastro<ralphr,bridgin„-solutions.com>;Kipp Schulties
<kschulties@gmail.com>; Faircloth,Justin<Justin.Faircloth,c iniramark.com>;Daniel Cox
<dhcox(:;gtcom.net>;Carl Hazenberg<Hazenbereverlastseawalls.com>;Tom Read
(gcneralmanageracedarhanunockcc.com)<generalmanager�u cedarhammockcc.com>;Rolando
Corsa<rolando g bridging-solutions.com>
Subject: RE: Preliminary Project Estimate for Cedar Hammock CDD Bulkheads&Bridges
Project
Good afternoon team:
I spoke with Kipp today and followed up with calls to Justin and Ralph. Kipp was kind enough
to discuss the background for his estimate,and he has also made time to attend the next CDD
meeting. He does not have the details we do for existing conditions(topo/soundings,soil
borings, etc),but I believe we can"scale"his scope items and costs to do a fairly good cost
comparison an a couple of specific areas,such as holes 5 and 4. His typical stacked rock walls
are one rock wide(about 3' +/-),5.5' to 6'tall and the base sits about 1' below lake control
elevation centered on a 10' wide shelf. Kipp's plan generally considered constructing the 5' -6'
tall stacked rock walls and adjusting the course backfill or excavation to meet the 6' wall
height. Holes 4 and 5 by the road were estimated with rip-rap,not stacked rocks as the visual
benefit is not as great there.
Ralph has provided notes on scaling the wall design for a taller application,if that is needed to
stay close to the current course footprint and copied you on his notes below. He has also added
some information on wall bedding and bridge replacement. I will add my notes in red below
where Kipp already answered some of the questions.
Kipp—My intent was to accurately pass on information we discussed and I know your time is
extremely limited. If you see anything I have stated incorrectly please chime in or we can
perhaps discuss at the meeting.
Thanks,
Sam
Samuel W. Marshall, P.E., LEER AP
Agenda Page 49
ENt1NERING
10511 Six Mile Cypress Parkway
Fort Myers, Florida 33966
(239)939-5490 office
(239)939-2523 fax
(239)898-0047 cell
From: Ralph Verrastro<ralph(r bridging-solutions.com>
Sent: Tuesday,April 30,2019 4:43 PM
To: Sam Marshall <SMarshall(aBanksEng.com>
Cc: Kipp Schulties<kschulties(agmail.com>; justin.faircloth c;inframark.com; Daniel Cox
<dhcox(rgtcom.net>;Carl Hazenberg<Hazenberab everlastseawalls.com>;Tom Read
(generalmanager,'ceedarhanunockec.com)<generalmanager( cedarhammockcc.com>; Rolando
Corsa<rolandorcOridging-solutions.com>
Subject: Re: Preliminary Project Estimate for Cedar Hammock CDD Bulkheads&Bridges
Project
Sam,
We reviewed the conceptual plans and conceptual wall design section and offer the following
comments/questions.
1. The bottom of the rock walls should be embedded preferably 2 feet below existing grade
not perched on existing ground as shown on the sketch. Some of this excavation will be
in soil and some of it will be rock in other areas.If rock is prevalent,pinning the bottom
rock to the bed rock using steel rods could be considered.
2. The base rock should be set on some type of bedding. #57 stone would be preferred.
3. The wall heights would be between 8 and 10 feet high and the design would be based on
a gravity wall analysis. See the attached gravity wall design summary we prepared for a
preliminary design from another project.The base rock would need to be at least 6 feet
wide if the all is 9 feet high.For the wall to act as an integral mass,the rocks would need
to fit tightly together with minimal gaps or concrete should be used to fill the gaps.
4. What is the proposed batter on the front face of the wall? The larger the batter the better
for stability but as the batter gets larger the course impacts increase.
5. I have seen this type of wall used for 4 or 5 feet high walls and the rocks are 4 feet wide.
Has Kipp seen 10 foot high walls done like this? Typically 3 —4 stones high, 5' -6' max
height with single rock wall width. Kipp did add some extra rocks/wall width for hole
17 with the taller wall.
6. What size rocks are available? Usually 1+' tall x 3' deep x 6' wide typical are readily
available.
7. Where are the sources of this material? Local Quarried limerock.
8. Will the contractor need to modify(cut)some of the rocks in the field to make them
fit? Yes,mostly smoothing out the top and bottom for a tighter fit.
9. How much will the rocks vary in appearance?
Agenda Page 50
10.How flat are the rocks?If they are not flat,the filter fabric would be spanning the gaps
and eventually the material will deteriorate and the backfill would come through the gaps
and the ground behind the wall would settle. Concrete could be used to fill these gaps but
using concrete could get expensive and difficult to manage in the field.Perhaps concrete
filled bags would be the way to go for this issue. I believe Kipp said he uses concrete
bags where needed.
11.It appears this proposal includes the full removal of the existing timber walls and
installing new rock walls in the same footprint.However,the foot print of the new rock
walls would be at least 6 feet wide at the base and the existing wall foot print is only
about 2 feet. Will the front face of the rock at the base line up with the piles in the
existing walls?If so,the excavation for the new walls will require damaging at least 20 to
25 feet of the golf course.
12.The$40 PSF estimate for wall construction appears low. This is based on a 5'-6' tall
wall,single rock thick.
13. What is the cost of the rock material delivered to the site?The price shown includes
delivery and placement of the rock.
14.The$25 PLF removal costs for the timber bridges is low. The removal costs from the
recent bids varied between$60 to$100 PLF.
15. To replace the bridges it appears Kipp is suggesting the construction of a filled causeway
supported on both sides by rock walls with culvert pipes going through transversely to
maintain the lake levels. The depth of the lakes at Bridges 4, 5 and 5A are up to 15 feet
deep.A gravity wall 15 feet high would need a base that is 9 feet wide. $40 PSF is
definitely low for a wall of this size.
Ralph Verrastro,PE
Principal
���
BRIDGING
oNG
*ppvBridging Solutions,LLC
15863 Secoya Reserve Circle
Naples,FL 34110
Phone: 239-216-1370
ralph'cc,bridging-solutions.com
ww.bridging-solutions.com
000
From:Sam Marshall[mailto:SMarshall@BanksEng.comj
Sent:Monday,May 13,2019 2:49 PM
To:Faircloth,Justin<Justin.Faircloth@inframark.com>; Daniel Cox<dhcox@gtcom.net>;Ralph Verrastro
<ralph@bridging-solutions.com>;Kipp Schulties<kschulties@gmail.com>;Carl Hazenberg
<H a ze n be rg @ eve rl a stse a wa l ls.co m>
Subject:Stacked Rock Bulkhead Wall Replacement Summary
Justin and Team:
The input from Kipp and Ralph is greatly appreciated and used as a basis for the notes below. The
conclusion is that there is a significant cost difference between building a wall from the land side and
building it from the water side. There is much less difference in cost between the material chosen.
Overall
There are hurdles to get past for the CDD's involvement in the stacked rock construction proposal
presented to the board. The CDD is responsible for the lakes. Much of the work shown in Kipp Schulties
proposal involves golf course construction outside of the CDD's ownership or easement interests. If the
community elects to move forward with the golf course and wall work shown on Kipp's plan,Attorney
Dan Cox will have to advise the CDD about what parts of the project it can undertake. For this reason
we did not spend a great deal of time reviewing work which heavily involved golf course renovations.
Comparison of Stacked Rock Proposal to the Vinyl Wall bids
There are significant differences that affect a cost comparison between these documents. The vinyl wall
construction bids we received are based on restricting the contractors work from the water side of the
existing walls. The stacked rock proposal is based on working from the land(golf course)side of the
walls. Another difference is that the stacked rock wall plan generally proposed rock walls with a height
of 5'to 6'and the walls being replaced are significantly taller. For these reasons a direct comparison of
the proposal and bid costs provided in order to select one versus the other is not valid. If the vinyl walls
were constructed at 5'—6'tall from land the price would be significantly reduced. An inquiry to Kelly
Brothers had 6'wall with 4'embedment(10'total)at about$400 per running foot. Likewise,taller rock
wall construction from the water side would increase those construction costs. See the hole#4 estimate
below.
Estimated Cost of a Stacked Rock wall at Golf Hole#4
Estimate a CDD project to construct a stacked rock wall as close as possible to the existing wood
bulkhead wall on Golf Hole#4.
1. The existing wall is approximately 7.5'above grade. See Worksheet Page 1.
2. The Rock Wall Detail provided by Kipp shows generally the construction elements for a 5'
stacked wall. See Worksheet Page 2.
3. The notes and Gravity Wall Design Summary provided by Bridging Solutions provide information
for taller walls. See Worksheet Pages 3 and 4.
4. Information has been added to the Bridging Solutions sketch to depict a rock wall at Golf Hole
#4,constructed as close as practically possible to the location of the existing wood wall. The
total wall height would be 9.5'with 7.5'exposed, 2'embedded. The wall base would be
approximately 6'wide. The excavation would extend approximately 20'to 25'into the golf
course. Approximately 3,500 CY of excavation would be needed at the proposed wall
location. The wall length is approximately 550'. See worksheet pages 5 and 6.
i.-
2 WV:Ct,=,-,,,f-,Y44,444:K7T4V;N:tt:4,,,,,retrItt#2$4170,0, —
, ..ii
N--
,%,r7.,...,44$4.,,,-1, -,' ,,,,,,-, ' •.‘-',,,,,,- ‘-:;:e--.44iket 8 1_
fie ,-:, , 44:,,
•,,,,,,..::—., ,7-' ,', , ,, .z , , , ,
, ..
. e ‘
,- • I..,,,,,N"'-At; (..)
i_i_...°,, _i_i_1.--4-14
rrt ,t A; i"k!.....=,-i --,- , •`,.
A ..-1: , ,,,...-,-. or
-i tivr.t!i:4er.,A...t.r..„,,,,;,‘„.0„„1. ,..._,,, -1/49-..4t, 1,,.to
, L.-, - -- .,-..wi, ',.,).r.-:.:1,1'',.,.14;,.. ‘., '''
al 1 r , - -‘ i, ,„4,2.,--4,--. ..-::•-ii-ltit.-_;:-::.L„....,.:.;,, .,-,,,,,,
,, _.... ni..*.i....i..-t_....i, . ..,...„%w,<A,,,,,,e4...v.,c...
-I i-- 0-1 1-,,,--, -g , . , 4 i'Apfek•
•,-..1*.-* ,,,,...
Ku;--.:4:-.4f.,2i1•1'.**;;;,,,,,,,t,,.',41;z4kz'-'1f,,, .,''-,=-A,Ftrg..1-' •.".:',:i.•.,'*-- .,..;:, to-!1
v4-.-,44,-;-r;?,--',..,.id:--...,-,..."-',4,-"*..-,-•.,•,:,,c,.: LX11-5,-;' f 5 1
'',''''' W;::,A,''
tr• ,k fl,%:::;JM.4,4,-,Z,,,,,Tig" 3W..404..,.,',.a..-A‘r.. ,,,:"..z;41i-,:.4.`4,T,-..?-44M-;'-''F g:11 i
$
1--- f
\i,, ' 3,....1
EN - i 'I.1.-i-i•; !...•,, -_k_i_a_g_l_"„ '..L.L1-.2i..1-3.--t •••-.1.tieJ'i 1
... ::. t- t
, ..,,,,,..... pszaarce- 1 ezmt--,...,
,_ :, ga,- ---4--....1 -'II t---77.-. ..-
„; ,...=-,...- 4
'
_±1 1: 1t.'1 = a M."--1V.,." I
-1 11 14-6,, ,, 7., _.,..= 4 ,_,:,.15,1 ,,,,,,,,, _:..., _ 4:1
V..) .=,,,,,,,,,,,-. 1
. stgr-' 61' s, %1 e R - - , 2 1 2,77.D. . 1,3 .
1 1 I
* t
0 a r
"±- — . „ '"='"'1 1 4 I „ " 4.-:',....i.c•;_....i..f, 1•I''_1_,c.. ___...1.f, tr.,j.,..,,_;4;„ ' .7.
„0 -- ______ , ...,_.. 1 i , ----. i .i. 2:7, __•,___,_. _ „ ,i_ •
.... ------L, --- 1 ,
12 ,.---- ,--- . -----
..,=.....,
.] - 10/[ii _ i f .11 ._
....,..,
--------\_ -4 ----- :. ..,...... .••=--...\_.
, , 0 ,
4 , I ,
r •••4
p, I_L .3- f„.. -/--/-V-t-4-1--1. r..- _ . .0,
- -- ,, ._ ,„ , f.,i_t_ i
_ _
1 a,-......\._ : t ' i =
I \- R ..oril 'ri 1..,,...,..- ---i--- ---. -
\t -1------1 al 'irEtir -- *--"'''''''- 7--1-1«i ........- i .,.
--I' .--.-,-- ' ' -
iiiik4
'I fe"t : 1 t-. 1 k -1 r:. 1,-r t ti--A 1 Irv '
0 N..•
.
0 C)
_t Ilf_7.t ,
-
iti 'li "
veR•ww. , 1 ,,,
1 a I-I-ir-r.f . trl I-r-T-1- .' i---t-Trl :f .4-; , 1-: .,--t 17 4
...............,..............,..... . is
Sam Marshall
From: Ralph Verrastro <ralph@bridging-solutions.com>
Sent: Tuesday,April 30,2019 4:43 PM
To: Sam Marshall
Cc: Kipp Schulties;justin:faircloth@inframark.com;Daniel Cox;Carl Hazenberg;Tom Read
(generalmanager@cedarhammockcc.com);Rolando Corsa
Subject: Re:Preliminary Project Estimate for Cedar Hammock CDD Bulkheads&Bridges Project
Attachments: Stone Gravity Wall Design Summary.pdf
Sam, �?isyA"tinll+ 60(..14 Si WA1.t� Le. isaC.a-E'i
We reviewed the conceptual plans and conceptual wall design section and offer the following comments/questions.
1. The bottom of the rock walls should be embedded preferably 2 feet below existing grade not perched on
existing ground as shown on the sketch.Some of this excavation will be in soil and some of it will be rock in
other areas. If rock is prevalent,pinning the bottom rock to the bed rock using steel rods could be considered.
2. The base rock should be set on some type of bedding.#57 stone would be preferred.
3. The wall heights would be between 8 and 10 feet high and the design would be based on a gravity wall analysis.
See the attached gravity wall design summary we prepared for a preliminary design from another project.The
base rock would need to be at least 6 feet wide if the all is 9 feet high. For the wall to act as an integral mass,the
rocks would need to fit tightly together with minimal gaps or concrete should be used to fill the gaps.
4. What is the proposed batter on the front face of the wall?The larger the batter the better for stability but as the
batter gets larger the course impacts increase.
5. I have seen this type of wall used for 4 or 5 feet high walls and the rocks are 4 feet wide.Has Kipp seen 10 foot
high walls done like this?
6. What size rocks are available?
7. Where are the sources of this material?
8, Will the contractor need to modify(cut)some of the rocks in the field to make them fit?
9. How much will the rocks vary in appearance?
10. How flat are the rocks?If they are not flat,the filter fabric would be spanning the gaps and eventually the
material will deteriorate and the backfill would come through the gaps and the ground behind the wall would
settle.Concrete could be used to fill these gaps but using concrete could get expensive and difficult to manage
in the field.Perhaps concrete filled bags would be the way to go for this issue.
11. It appears this proposal includes the full removal of the existing timber walls and installing new rock walls in the
same footprint.However,the foot print of the new rock walls would be at least 6 feet wide at the base and the
existing wall foot print is only about 2 feet.Will the front face of the rock at the base line up with the piles in the
existing walls?If so,the excavation for the new walls will require damaging at least 20 to 25 feet of the golf
course.
12. The$40 PSF estimate for wall construction appears low.
13. What is the cost of the rock material delivered to the site?
14. The$25 PLF removal costs for the timber bridges is low.The removal costs from the recent bids varied between
$60 to$100 PLF.
15. To replace the bridges it appears Kipp is suggesting the construction of a filled causeway supported on both
sides by rock walls with culvert pipes going through transversely to maintain the lake levels.The depth of the
lakes at Bridges 4,5 and 5A are up to 15 feet deep.A gravity wall 15 feet high would need a base that is 9 feet
wide.$40 PSF is definitely low for a wall of this size.
Ralph Verrastro,PE
Principal
1
LOWriori oF 51-0.4.1,<CV 4,0(.1c wA4-1- VI • eXiST wAL-4-,
_........_
1•14411 f
sti Cip•iit se
BRIDGING oltie .
v SOLUTIONS =.(--ek :-.4(..i, (J:i0,.. 41,-/2:<. -
-\-' •
F&ONcuv,^411tigfr ' ipoila
4 :
i I ,,_14,41:10T4 , ,. : - ' i , ; -i- ; ' .1--- • --i - --I---i----
I I Virre ! 1 i , I , 1
t 4 i i - ! 1 1 - • '• •-• - •I- . -i : -4 ' r "‘' ' ; 1
; I 1 i , 1. .,. . ,-. ...„L,r_ ,. , . ..i.. • • _i ir
... ....... 4........, ....r. ...“.sisi .. _ ,
. i - . re', - ' r II, - •Z T.:..1-•-•••_1-: •‘: .i.. :..._! r 11,
. .
_
kedvoi,!.ii,..4A 4 ./1( , ---.--_ (-73) .
I i 1
—4'1--
., . 1i tc,) . tii)-.1 c:I. r -----•":;;- . i i .f.' 1 . i • ,. .
'+‘-SC ..001. r •
1
.. 1 . i . 1, 1 ! . 00017,00* : lr,. ,, ... . ,...
_ i 1
00 0 .
se
• , si
�® 4'.P°1:)... ca
c) 4 CJ
4
...00.•0' I
I ...Foe , • -a -
1•541' - till!, ,-._, . , • . ,, ,0•00/00.10 .1: 42..104
1 .,,,,, : , •
- 691 i4410.3f. il -;00•04....„..:" (r i . i' " i i ,r,(101:ti 1,1- ity4
, +, 1 s„„0„.....„. is.,-........4.---..... --
i •-•67e e4)441 • i ....!:00 _„ . - .... n
I. soo".••• - . : • ' MI P 4 r• 1 4
se
i 1 4
- I
. •..' : . _i i „0,0,111.7,0 ,
1
t'5 1441.1111" 1 i ' ...# '—-'.. . 4 1 1
-,1111r0°., ' '' -
, 1
a 4le, 1 ' e h 4 :.
0 , ...... i. t ,I 1 •11.11 , 47(10 i'f"T l'4,1 .,, '.° '4!40 ' -
•
.,011 4 4 Go ,;...A',7, go. .0 I
1 -1
I ;
. .
%.4..—.1.-
: .. .,
1 I
' i , 1 1 I 1 • I .4
' , I I ___ • t
, .
.
. I
VI. l I 1 • - ,... A. t i
Ji
• . i 1 ; nib
SOA.14...S Ci C.;rrec:af;,4(1J '' 14 CL*) ,..., ., . *041
: 1 , i • JO*
, ,-
1.roFt04Ati_..41 f.1.0 ,..9 -4-<> Sii+0.e.1.4(4 -N't^''VA"ve 4 S -4.46it'l elt-1-1
; • •6 • 1 1 cx,
4,..„ • A ' is
17 .5-r!.,-3:46T7.el ca .ek,•1/4/9.4,-V'.Ats). . qb, .: -I-ri.-1./A,TV ..----14) 7112 rnire.
- -'-=. CP ig,SG• 1--).4- A,,,,oev .-044/4.44T-T.A 0 A Sliz.,.coozAt...
Designed by, F-ki Checked by: R.( .
—
S
Cedar Hammock
Preliminary Project. Estimate
1,1Pi,stlitA.rtl
Updati..d: April lit,2019
,
Hardt COStS 11.0 1.- .:' 'IP 47/ 1A14 44-- 6:1--e3-44e;,i-i 3 "r '-1
Item Qty. Unit Scheduled Proj.Qty.,Projected Cost Completed
3 07. „0. Mobilization 1 Ls $ - $ 25,000.00 1 $ 25,00(1.00 $ - /coo
Grass,Stripping&Burial 10 AC 2,350.00 $ 23,50(1,00 10 S 23,500.00 $ ..
Greens Mix Salvage 0 CY 5.00 $ .. 0 $ - $
Green Core Puts 0 CY 4.50 $ - 0 $ - $ _
. ,
CialtereteCart Path Removal 2,750 IF 4.00 $ 11,000.(X) 2,750 $ 11,(XX).00 $ _
...Remove ExistinkBollifteati Wails 3,020 LI' 10th) $ 30,200.00 3,020 $ 30,20(1.00 $
Remove Wood Bridger. 537 1,F 25.00 S I 3,425.0f) 537 $ 13,125(1(1 $
Tree Removal(allegation) i 0 IS - $ - 0 $ - $ -
Tree Transplantation ' 1 LS - 5 5,01i0.0r1 1 $ 5,m10 oo S _
'3 07. ... De-watering:likett ' i IS 5 35,00().00 1 $ 35,000.00
-I,5"c74)A° Earthmoving 0100-ruck excavation) 12,500 CY 4.75 S 59,375.1/(1 12,500 $ 59,375.00 s • ‘4,
0 ... EarthmovinglRock Excavation) 10,000 cy 7.00 5 70,on()(x) 10,000 $ 70,0(1).1111 a
Nein USGA Greens' 0 Si $ 5.00 $ 0 $ - $
Tie ennstructiOn 20,000 $1, 5 0.50 $ 0.1,000.00 20,000 S 10,000.00 $
Netit Sand lititilters • - 5,000 51, $ 350 $ 17,500.(8) 5,000 S 17,500.00 $
3 a ie..• Shaping- ' 1' - - . ,., 1 LS $ - $ 15,000.011 1 $ I 53100.00 $
5 i 71 0.Stacked Rock(Wails/Culverts) 13,20(1 Si. $ t, 460 s 1328,000.00 13,200 $ 528,000.011 .$ - 31‘.17 o 4t--
4,'*001tkw41/N-12 004; ' - 400 I 1 $ 6.00 $ 2,400.00 400 $ 2,400.(X) $
,..-5-0 ,....6'smoOtti*Oli N.12 pipe 2,000 1..6 $ 7.35 S 11.7(10.00 2,001) $ 14,700000 $
ii"smoottmilti$42iripir - . 1,000 1.,1, $ 9.50 $ 9,500.00 1,000 S 9,50018) $
:36..1442 Lake EquAWer pipe(-117) 180 11, $ 70.00 $ 12,010.(1() 180 5 12 60).00 $ _
, -
Storm Water Pipe tensions llt 16 1 I S $ - 5 15,000.00 1 5 15,000(10
te Catch Basin(Metal gate) 8 L I S 325.00 S 2,600.00 8 $ 2,600.00 $
'12-'Catch Basin(metal grate) 6 C.r $ 450.00 $ 2,700.00 6 $ 2,70(1.00 5 -
12"Square Cart Paths Basins 15 CT $ 500.00 S 7,500.1)0 15 $ 7,500,00 S _
Pipes 3 CI $ 30,000.00 S 90,000.00 3 S 90,(1(10.00 S -
Conteekripe Installation:''' 3 CI S 5,000.00 S 15,00(1 00 3 $ 15,000.10 $ •
Irrigation Impacts(allocation) 1 IS $ - s 15(),(x)(1.00 1 $ i5o,Ono.(i0 $ -
Rip Installation , - 60,000 SE, $ 6.50 $ 3t.80388100 60,000 $ 390,000.00
ori4g0,4 :00tiitt(#"0.and 18) 775 1.1' $ 500.00 '- 387,500.00 775 5 387,500.00
New Concrete cart Paths. 2,750 1_,F $ 33.00 $ 90,750.00 2,750 S 90,750.00 5 .
Conceie CUrbing' ' 2,000 1.1.: $ 7.00 ..i; 14,000.00 2,000 S 14,000.00 5
-
Grassing Preparation ' 7 A(' $ 2,500.00 $ 17.500.00 7 $ 17,500.00 $
GrassingTee“Celebration sprigs 0 SF $ 0.35 $ - 0 $ - 5 -
Celebration Sod, - ' 175,000 sr $ 0.45 S 78,750.00 175,000 5 78,750.00 5 -
St.Augustine Stid' , 30,000 SF 5 0.55 5 16,500.00 30,000 S 16,500.0(1
Bahia Sed(0 171 8,000 SF S 0.30 5 2,400.(x) 8,000 5 2,400.00
3 0.0,. Travel Route Restoration 1 1,5 $ - $ 25A100.(1() 1 S 25,11011.00 $
Sub-Total S 2,167,400.00 $ - $ 2,187,400.00 $
4-
5"t5o, t....(7-
(1)r)i I l''') A C
0 s---i 1i....A A va 64 0 2c,-,..,. (.-t,. - -.('-.-z- -1-te't /1„,c c K ..?
1 S
C 7 7 ile-A- ,,,,.-..a.r roi-ovt, -)
,,,,I. ft..,VI:(4 iF 4'1 .•
1
1 n . 1
up: ,
)
..
..,,
- .
. _..
,,,, , .•
..,...„
)
...,,.
.,..
_.„
,..,
* ..
,..._
....i,
a -44'
,,_ ,....
. ,
.,.
.,_
--„,...,, ,,,,,...... - --• , .„ .,_.
. .
... . . k,/
L ) ,
2
/
/
, ,. . .
N. ..
, .
.
, . •
-. .,• ' /
1
E")(
- /
i
E LA-4 0,p,-T-E_ t 5LIN,sz
•
. LZZAIMMEMEIMINIM
RESOLUTION NO.2019-08
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE CEDAR
HAMMOCK COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT OF COLLIER
COUNTY, RELATING TO THE IMPOSITION, LEVY, COLLECTION
AND ENFORCEMENT OF CERTAIN NON•AD VALOREM SPECIAL
ASSESSMENTS TO PROVIDE PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS ON
PROPERTY WITHIN THE DISTRICT CONSTITUTING THE
A.SSESSMENT RESOLUTION; EQUALIZING, APPROVING,
CONFIRMING, APPORTIONING, LEVYING AND DECLARING
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS; INDICATING THE LOCATION, NATURE
AND ESTIMATED COST OF THE PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS
WHERE COST IS TO BE DEFRAYED BY THE NON-AD VALOREM
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS; PROVIDING THE PORTIONS OF THE
ESTIMATED COSTS OF THE PROJECT. IMPROVEMENTS TO BE
DEFRAYED BY THE NON-AD VALOREM SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS;
PROVIDING THE MANNER IN WHICH SUCH NON-AD VALOREM
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS SHALL BE IMPOSED, LEVIED AND
COLLECTED; PROVIDING WHEN THE IMPOSITION AND LEVY
SHALL TAKE PLACE; DESIGNATING THE LANDS UPON WHICH
THE NON-AD VALOREM SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS SHALL BE
LEVIED; PROVIDING FOR AN ASSESSMENT PLAT; APPROVING
AND ADOPTINC THE FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL; PROVIDING FOR
SEVERABILITY AND CONFLICT; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the Board pursuant to the uniform charter of the District, Section 190.006-
190.041, Florida Statutes and pursuant to Chapter 170, Florida Statutes,has adopted Resolution
2019-04 determining to make or cause to be made certain project improvements and defray the
expense thereof by non-ad valorem special assessments("special assessments" or
"assessments"), and has published Resolution 2019-04 in accord with Section 190.022, Florida
Statutes, and Section 170.05, Florida Statutes; and
WHEREAS, as authorized by its charter and pursuant to Section 170.07, Florida Statutes, the
Board adopted Resolution 2019-03 setting a public hearing for Tuesday,April 23, 2019 at 2:00
p.m. at Cedar Hammock Clubhouse, 8660 Cedar Hammock Boulevard,Naples, Florida, for the
purpose of hearing public comment on the levy of the non-ad valorem special assessments and
notice of such public hearing has been given by publication and by mail as required by Section
170.07. Florida Statutes; and
1
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 170.08, Florida Statutes, the Board did meet as an
equalizing board and held a public hearing on April 23, 2019 at 2:00 p.m. to receive testimony
from affected property owners as to the propriety and advisability of making the project
improvements and funding them with non-ad valorem special assessments on property within the
District as to the cost thereof, as to the manner of payment therefor, and as to the amount thereof
to be assessed against each property so improved; and
WHEREAS,the Board is empowered by the District's charter and is authorized to
provide the project improvements, to issue special assessment bonds and to amortize bonds by
the levy of non-ad valorem special assessments on property; and
WHEREAS, the District has ascertained and determined that special benefits shall accrue
peculiar to the parcels of property involved, over and above any general community-wide
benefits, from, and based upon the logical relationship with, the systems, facilities and services
constituting the project improvements,and that the duty per parcel to pay for these benefits shall
be in proportion, that is, fairly and reasonably apportioned per parcel as set forth in Exhibit "B",
attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference; and
WHEREAS, the District has determined that the non-ad valorem special assessments
shall not exceed the special and peculiar benefits to the property, and has adjusted and equalized
the assessments on a basis of justice and right with reasonable and fair apportionment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY TILE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF
THE CEDAR HAMMOCK COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT COLLIER
COUNTY, FLORIDA:
1. This resolution is adopted pursuant to the provisions of the District's uniform
general law charter and Section 170.08, Florida Statutes. The findings and
determinations set forth in the above Whereas clauses are true and correct and by
this reference are incorporated herein.
2. This resolution constitutes the assessment resolution, following the Board having
met as an equalizing board to hear and consider any and all complaints as to the
non-ad valorem special assessments and having adjusted and equalized the
assessments on a basis of justice and right and reasonable fair apportionment.
3. The nature and related aspects of project improvements, including the location of
the improvements, as set forth in Exhibit "A", attached hereto,with more specific
drawings of plans specifications on file in the offices of the District Engineer, are
hereby authorized and approved and the proper officers, employees and agents of
the District are hereby authorized and directed to take such further action as may
be necessary or desirable to cause the same to be made.
2
4. The non-ad valorem special assessments shall be levied on all lots and lands
adjoining and contiguous or bounding and abutting upon such improvements or
otherwise specially and peculiarly benefitted thereby and further designated by
the assessment plat hereinafter provided for.
5. The estimated cost of the project improvements is $5,146,800.00(hereinafter
referred to as the"Estimated Cost").
6. The non-ad valorem special assessments will defray the Estimated Cost,plus
financing related costs,discounts, capitalized interest,debt service reserve and
contingency.
7. The manner in which the assessment shall be made is as set forth in Exhibit "B",
attached hereto.
8. The office of the District Engineer, Banks Engineering, are located at 10511 Ben
C. Pratt/Six Mile Cypress Parkway, Fort Myers. FL 33966.
9. At the referenced location,the District Engineer has available for inspection an
assessment plat showing the land areas to be assessed, complete with plans and
specifications describing the project improvements and delineating the Estimated
Cost; these documents will remain open to inspection by the public.
10. In the event the actual cost of the improvements exceeds the Estimated Costs,
such excess shall also he paid by the District from additional non-ad valorem
special assessments on the specially and peculiarly benefitted property on the
assessment plat, or, alternatively, from other legally available revenues of the
District, or from contributions from other entities, as and when authorized
specifically by the Board.
11. It is hereby ascertained, determined and declared that the project improvements as
set forth in Exhibit "A" shall result in special benefits peculiar to the parcels of
property involved, over and above any general community-wide benefit, based
upon the logical relationship of the system, facilities and services provided to the
property; it is further ascertained, determined and declared that among the special
benefits so derived are the added use,the added enjoyment and the increased
marketability of the property.
12. It is hereby ascertained, determined and declared that the apportionment of the
duty of each parcel owner to pay the particular non-ad valorem special
assessments,the subject of this assessment resolution, shall be based upon the
total equivalent residential units as set forth in the assessment methodology and
3
related provisions of Exhibit "B"so that,thereby,the duty to pay is fairly and
reasonably apportioned so as not to exceed the amount of special benefit peculiar
to each parcel of property and in relationship of one property owner with the
other.
13. Based upon this determination,ascertainment and declaration of special and
peculiar benefit to property and of the duty to pay apportioned in a fair and
reasonable manner, and limited by such determination,ascertainment and
declaration,the final assessment roll as set forth in Exhibit"B",which shows the
lots and lands assessed and the amount of the non-ad valorem special assessment
levied against each parcel on property, on a fair and reasonable basis,and the
number of annual installments as to which each such assessment is divided,
subject to Paragraph 14 herein,is hereby approved and adopted. The special
assessments for the project improvements on the parcels specially benefitted by
the project improvements, all as specified in the final assessment roll included
Exhibit"B"to this Resolution, are hereby equalized, approved, confirmed,
reasonably apportioned, and levied. Promptly following the adoption of this
Resolution,those special assessments shall be recorded by the Secretary of the
Board of the District in a special book,to be known as the"Improvement Lien
Book." Such special assessments with interest and any penalties shall constitute
legal,valid and binding first liens upon the property against which such
assessments are made until paid;however, upon completion of the improvements,
the District shall credit to each of the assessments the difference in the
assessments as originally made, approved, and confirmed and the proportionate
part of the actual cost of the improvements to be paid by special assessments as
finally determined upon the completion of the improvements,but in no event shall
the final assessment exceed the amount of benefits originally assessed. In making
such credit,no discount shall be granted or credit given for any pan of the payee's
proportionate share of any actual bond financing costs,such as capitalized
interest, funded reserves or bond discount included in the estimated cost of any
such improvements. Such credits shall be entered in the Improvement Lien Book.
Once the final amount of special assessments for all of the Improvements have
been determined,the term"special assessment"shall,with respect to each parcel,
mean the sum finally assessed against that parcel as herein provided.
14. Commencing within the year the non-ad valorem special assessments are first
levied,they shall be paid in not more than twenty(20)annual installments of
principal and interest,which shall be subject to optional prepayments,all in a
manner to be determined in a supplemental resolution. Collections of the special
assessments shall be pursuant to procedures authorized by state law.
4
15. If any section or part of a section of this Resolution shall be declared invalid or
unconstitutional, the validity, force and effect of any other section or part of a
section of this Resolution shall not thereby be affected or impaired unless it
clearly appears that such other section or part of a section of this Resolution is
wholly or necessarily dependent upon the section or part of a section so held to be
invalid or unconstitutional.
16. All resolutions,or parts thereof in conflict herewith are to the extent of such
conflict,hereby superseded and repealed.
17. This resolution shall take effect upon its adoption.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 14`x' day of May, 2019.
THE CEDAR HAMMOCK
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DISTRICT
Attest:
,--"-- ..1.ireakitat„,4„,—... j."�
s. iet Manager r C airman, Board Law ervisor•
5
CEDAR HAMMOCK
Community Development District
Annual Operating and Debt Service Budget
Fiscal Year 2020
Adopted Budget
(Meeting 5/14119)
Prepared by:
6INFRAMARK
INFRASTRUCTURE MANAGEMENT SERVICES
CEDAR HAMMOCK
Community Development District
Table of Contents
Page#
OPERATING BUDGET
General Fund 001 and 002
Summary of Revenues,Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances 1 -3
Budget Narrative 4-7
Exhibit A-Allocation of Fund Balances 8
SUPPORTING BUDGET SCHEDULES
2019-2020 Non-Ad Valorem Assessment Summary 9
CEDAR HAMMOCK
Community Development District
Budget Overview
Fiscal Year 2020
CEDAR HAMMOCK
Community Development District
Operating Budget
Fiscal Year 2020
CEDAR HAMMOCK
Community Development District Genera/Fund
Summary of Revenues,Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances
Fiscal Year 2020 Adopted Budget
ADOPTED ACTUAL PROJECTED TOTAL ANNUAL
ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET THRU MAR- PROJECTED BUDGET
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FEB-2019 SEP-2019 FY 2019 FY 2020
REVENUES
Interest-Investments $ 5,263 $ 9,400 $ 2,017 $ 5,654 7,916 13,570 $ 10,570
Interest-Tax Collector - 16 - 143 - - -
Special Assmnts-Tax Collector 279,650 379,525 379,523 360,172 19,351 379,523 157,458
Special Assmnts-Other - - - - - - 261,622
Special Assmnts-Discounts (10,283) (14,175) (15,181) (13,993) - (15,181) (17,563)
Other Miscellaneous Revenus - 5,986 - 1,100 - 1,100 -
TOTAL REVENUES 274,630 380,754 366,359 353,076 27,267 379,012 432,086
EXPENDITURES
Administrative
ProfServ-Engineering 22,806 19,768 30,000 4,560 6,384 10,944 30,000
ProfServ-Legal Services 1,413 1,593 2,000 4,125 1,167 5,292 4,249
ProfServ-Mgmt Consulting Sery 32,130 37,286 38,404 16,002 22,402 38,404 39,556
ProfServ-Property Appraiser 4,195 4.195 5,693 5,693 - 5,693 6,601
ProfServ-Special Assessment 2,855 2,855 2,941 2,941 - 2,941 3,029
ProfServ-Web Site Maintenance 617 637 656 273 383 656 676
Auditing Services 5,000 5,000 5,000 - 5,000 5,000 5.000
Postage and Freight 1,050 549 765 810 1,134 1,944 900
Insurance-General Liability 7,235 7,235 7,959 7,000 - 7,000 7,700
Printing and Binding 933 2,310 2,246 793 1,110 1,903 1,903
Legal Advertising 2,090 2,181 2,394 245 1,891 2,136 2,394
Misc-Bank Charges 656 653 700 23/ 418 655 700
Misc-Assessmnt Collection Cost 3,618 (1,019) 7,590 6,924 387 7,311 8,802
Misc-Web Hosting 115 47 239 239 - 239 246
Office Supplies - 33 400 - 233 400 400
Annual District Filing Fee 175 175 175 175 - 175 175
Total Administrative 84,888 83,498 107,162 50,017 40,508 90,691 112,331
Field
ProfServ-Field Management 1,450 1,494 1,539 641 898 1,539 1,585
Contracts-Water Mgmt Services 7,200 7,200 7,200 3,000 4,200 7,200 7,200
Utility-Cameras 1,288 1,160 1,320 533 746 1,279 1,268
Electricity-Wells 2,841 4,324 3,000 656 918 1,574 3,000
Electricity-Aerator 1,325 1,596 2,000 649 909 1,558 2,000
R&M-Lake - 2,167 3,000 3,113 1,750 4,863 3,000
R&M-Plant Replacement 1,593 - 3,015 - 1,759 1,759 3,015
R&M-Bulkheads - - 8,000 8.000 - 8,000 8.000
R&M-Bridges - - 8,000 - 8,000 8,000 8,000
Misc-Contingency 18,529 15,966 20,289 5,925 8,295 14,220 12,243
Capital Outlay 22,875 - 9,044 6,008 3,936 9,944 9,944
Total Field 57,101 33,909 67,307 28,525 31,411 59,936 59,255
I TOTAL EXPENDITURES 141,989 117,407 174,469 78,542 71,918 150,627 171,586
Annual Operating Budget
Fiscal Year 2020 Page 1
CEDAR HAMMOCK
Community Development District General Fund
Summary of Revenues,Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances
Fiscal Year 2020 Adopted Budget
ADOPTED ACTUAL PROJECTED TOTAL ANNUAL
ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET THRU MAR- PROJECTED BUDGET
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FEB-2019 SEP-2019 FY 2019 FY 2020
Reserve-Bridges - 28,840 20,910 16,200 4,710 20.910 35,000
Reserve-Bulkheads 45,332 15,412 83,980 58,235 25,745 83,980 95,500
Reserve-Lakes 442 12,400 15,000 - 15,000 15,000 25,000
Reserve-Roadways 194,370 32,141 72,000 - 72,000 72,000 105,000
Total Reserves 240,144 88,793 191,890 74,435 117,455 191,890 260,500
TOTAL EXPENDITURES&RESERVES 382,133 206,200 366,359 152,977 189,373 342,517 432,086
Excess(deficiency)of revenues
Over(under)expenditures (107,503) 174,554 - 200,099 (162,106) 36,495 -
Net change in fund balance (107,503) 174,554 - 200,099 (162,106) 36,495 -
Fund balance-audit adjustments - - - - - - -
FUND BALANCE,BEGINNING 717,406 609,903 784,457 784,457 - 784,457 820,952
FUND BALANCE,ENDING $ 609,903 $ 784,457 $ 784,457 $ 984,556 $ (162,106) $ 820,952 $ 820,952
Annual Operating Budget
Fiscal Year 2020 Page 2
CEDAR HAMMOCK
Community Development District General Fund(002)
Summary of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances
Fiscal Year 2020 Adopted Budget
ADOPTED ACTUAL PROJECTED TOTAL ANNUAL
BUDGET THRU MAR- PROJECTED BUDGET
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION FY 2019 FEB-2019 SEP-2019 FY 2019 FY 2020
REVENUES
Special Assmnts-Tax Collector $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,166,613
Special Assmnts-CDD Collected - - 1,989,010 1,989,010 -
Special Assmnts-Discounts - - (79,560) (79,560) (46,665)
TOTAL REVENUES - - 1,909,450 1,909,450 1,119,948
EXPENDITURES
Administrative
ProfSery-Property Appraiser - - 29,835 29,835 17,499
Misc-Assessmnt Collection Cost - - - - 23,332
Total Administrative - - - - 40,831
Field
ProfServ-Field Management - - 450,000 450,000 -
Capital Outlay Bulkhead and Bridges - - 1,959,450 1,959,450 1,079,117
Total Field 2,409,450 2,409,450 1,079,117
TOTAL EXPENDITURES - - 2,409,450 2,409,450 1,119,948
Excess(deficiency)of revenues
Over(under)expenditures - - (500,000) (500,000) 1,119,948
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES(USES)
Loan Proceeds - - 500,000 500,000 500,000
TOTAL OTHER SOURCES(USES) - - 500,000 500,000 500,000
Net change in fund balance - - (500,000) (500,000) 1,119,948
FUND BALANCE,BEGINNING - - - - -
FUND BALANCE,ENDING $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Annual Operating Budget
Fiscal Year 2020Page 3
CEDAR HAMMOCK
Community Development District General Fund
Budget Narrative
Fiscal Year 2020
REVENUES:
Interest Income
The District earns interest on the monthly average collected balance for their operating
accounts, money market accounts and certificates of deposits.
Special Assessments-Tax Collector
The District will levy a Non-Ad Valorem assessment on all sold and platted parcels within the District in
order to pay for the operating expenditures during the Fiscal Year.
Special Assessments—COD Collected
The District will bill a Non-Ad Valorem assessment on all the assessable property within the District not
currently collected through the Tax Collector in order to pay for the operating expenditures during the
Fiscal Year.
Special Assessments-Other
The District will levy a Non-Ad Valorem assessment on all sold and platted parcels within the District in
order to pay for Reserves based on the study from May 2017.
Special Assessments-Discounts
Per Section 197.162, Florida Statutes, discounts are allowed for early payment of assessments. The
budgeted amount for the fiscal year is calculated at 4% of the anticipated Non-Ad Valorem
assessments.
EXPENDITURES:
Administrative:
Prof Service-Engineering
The District's engineer will be providing general engineering services to the District, i.e.,attendance and
preparation for monthly board meetings,review invoices,etc.
Prof Service-Legal Services
The District's legal counsel will be providing general legal services to the District, i.e., attendance &
preparation for monthly meetings, review operating& maintenance contracts,etc.
Prof Service-Management Consulting Sery
The District receives Management, Accounting and Administrative services as part of a Management
Agreement with Inframark Infrastructure Management Services. These services are further outlined in
Exhibit"A"of the Management Agreement. A 3%increase is proposed.
Annual Operating Budget
Fiscal Year 2020
Page 4
CEDAR HAMMOCK
Community Development District General Fund
Budget Narrative
Fiscal Year 2020
EXPENDITURES:
Administrative(coned)
Prof Service-Property Appraiser
The Property Appraiser provides the District with a listing of the legal description of each property
parcel within the District boundaries,and the names and addresses of the owners of such property. The
District reimburses the Property Appraiser for necessary administrative costs incurred to provide this
service. Per the Florida Statutes,administrative costs shall include, but not be limited to,those costs
associated with personnel,forms,supplies,data processing,computer equipment, postage,and
programming. The budget for property appraiser costs was based on 1.5%of gross assessments.
Prof Service-Special Assessment
The District's Collection Agent will be providing financials services which include the collection
of prepaid assessments, maintenance of District's assessment roll and levying the annual
operating and maintenance assessments.
Prof Service—Web Site Maintenance
Inframark Infrastructure Management Services maintains the District's email accounts & updates the
web site information. A 3%increase is proposed.
Auditing Services
The District is required annually to conduct an audit of its financial records by an Independent Certified
Public Accounting Firm.
Postage and Freight
Mailing of agenda packages,overnight deliveries,correspondence,etc.
Insurance-General Liability
The District's General Liability & Public Officials Liability Insurance policy is with The Florida League of
Cities, Inc.The Florida League of Cities, Inc. specializes in providing insurance coverage to governmental
agencies.
Printing&Binding
Printing and Binding agenda packages for board meetings, printing of computerized checks, stationary,
envelopes etc.
Legal Advertising
The District is required to advertise various notices for monthly Board meetings, public hearings, etc. in
a newspaper of general circulation.
Annual Operating Budget
Fiscal Year 2020
Page 5
CEDAR HAMMOCK
Community Development District General Fund
Budget Narrative
Fiscal Year 2020
EXPENDITURES:
Administrative(cont'd)
Misc-Bank Charges
Bank analysis fees that are incurred during the year.
Misc-Assessment Collection Costs
The District reimburses the Tax Collector for necessary administrative costs. Per the Florida
Statutes, administrative costs shall include, but not be limited to, those costs associated with
personnel, forms, supplies, data processing, computer equipment, postage, and programming.
The District also compensates the Tax Collector for the actual cost of collection or 2% on the
amount of special assessments collected and remitted, whichever is greater. The budget for
collection costs was based on a maximum of 2%of the anticipated assessment collections.
Misc—Web Hosting
The District incurs expenses to maintain and renew their website domain and email accounts.
Office Supplies
Miscellaneous office supplies required for the preparation of agenda packages.
Annual District Filing Fee
The District is required to pay an annual fee of$175 to the Dept of Economic Opportunity Div.
Field Services:
Prof Service—Field Management
Inframark Infrastructure Management Services inspects the field and provides an annual report.
Contracts—Water Mgmt Services
Professional services for environmental permit compliance. Currently all fees associated with the
renewal of the Water Use Permit.
Contracts-Water Quality
Professional services in monitoring water quality for reporting to regulatory agencies.
Utility—Cameras
Comcast provides monitoring services for the District's gate cameras.
Electricity-Wells
FPL provides electrical services for the District's pumps at the following addresses:
• 8684 Cedar Hammock Circle-Well#4 Meter KL35128
• 3639 Cedar Hammock Court—Well#6 Meter ACD4996
Annual Operating Budget
Fiscal Year 2020
Page 6
CEDAR HAMMOCK
Community Development District General Fund
Budget Narrative
Fiscal Year 2020
EXPENDITURES:
Administrative(cont'd)
Electricity-Aerators
FPL provides electrical services for the District's pumps at the following addresses:
• 3826 Wax Myrtle Run—Meter ACD4234
• 8892 Cedar Hammock Blvd—Meter ACD4976
• 3766 Buttonwood Way—Meter ACD8387
R&M-Lake
Repair and maintenance expenses related to lakes including washout repairs and erosion.
R&M—Plant Replacement
Replace landscape plantings at pumps.
Misc-Contingency
Any current year Field expenditure that may not have been provided for in the budget.
Capital Outlay
Capital expenditures for items such as irrigation equipment or other items meeting capital expenditure
requirements.
Capital Outlay—Bulkhead and Bridges
Renovation project consistent for Lake 11 consisting of Road Bulkhead,Island Bulkhead, Bridge 5A and
Bridge 5B.
Reserves:
Reserve-Bridges
Funds to be set aside for future bridge expenditures as determined by the BOS.
Reserve-Bulkheads
Funds to be set aside for future bulkhead expenditures as determined by the BOS.
Reserve-Lakes
Funds to be set aside for future lake expenditures as determined by the BOS.
Reserve-Roadways
Funds to be set aside for future roadway expenditures as determined by the BOS.
Annual Operating Budget
Fiscal Year 2020
Page 7
CEDAR HAMMOCK
Community Development District General Fund
Exhibit"A"
Allocation of Fund Balances
AVAILABLE FUNDS
Amount
Beginning Fund Balance-Fiscal Year 2020 $ 820,952
Net Change in Fund Balance-Fiscal Year 2020 -
Reserves-Fiscal Year 2020 Additions 260,500
!Total Funds Available(Estimated)-FY20 1,081,452
ALLOCATION OF AVAILABLE FUNDS
Assigned Fund Balance
Operating Reserve-First Quarter Operating Capital 42,897 (1)
Reserves-Bridges
Prior Year's Reserve Funding 139,090
FY 2019 Reserve Funding 20,910
Less Actual FY19 (16,200)
FY 2020 Reserve Funding 35,000 178,800
Reserves-Bulkheads
Prior Year's Reserve Funding 141,709
FY 2019 Reserve Funding 83,980
Less Actual FY19 (58,235)
FY 2020 Reserve Funding 95,500 262,954
Reserves-Lakes
Prior Year's Reserve Funding 44,553
FY 2019 Reserve Funding 15,000
FY 2020 Reserve Funding 25,000 84,553
Reserves-Roadways
Prior Year's Reserve Funding 184,409
FY 2019 Reserve Funding - 72,000
FY 2020 Reserve Funding 105,000 361,409
Subtotal 930,613
Total Allocation of Available Funds 930,613
Total Unassigned(undesignated)Cash $ 150,839
Notes
(1)Represents approximately 3 months of operating expenditures less FY2020 budget reserves.
Annual Operating Budget
Fiscal Year 2020
Page 8
CEDAR HAMMOCK
Community Development District
Supporting Budget Schedules
Fiscal Year 2020
CEDAR HAMMOCK
Community Development District
2019-2020 Assessment Chart
Reserve 0&M Special Total Prior Year
Assessment Assessment Assessment Assessment
Percent
Product Total Units FY 2020 FY 2020 FY 2020 Total 2020 FY 2019 Change
Single Family 65 $ 352.47 $ 197.07 $ 1,460.09 $ 2,009.63 $ 475.00 323 1%
2-Story 228 $ 352.47 $ 197.07 $ 1,460.09 $ 2,009.63 $ 475.00 323.1%
4-Story 330 $ 352.47 $ 197.07 $ 1,460.09 $ 2,009.63 $ 475.00 323.1%
Duplex 176 $ 352.47 $ 197.07 $ 1,460.09 $ 2,009.63 $ 475.00 323.1%
799
Annual Operating Budget
Fiscal Year 2020
Page 9
RESOLUTION 2019-09
A RESOLUTION OF THE CEDAR HAMMOCK COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT RELATING TO THE ANNUAL
APPROPRIATIONS OF THE DISTRICT AND ADOPTING THE
BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING OCTOBER 1,2019
AND ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2020, AND REFERENCING THE
MAINTENANCE AND BENEFIT SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS TO BE
LEVIED BY THE DISTRICT FOR SAID FISCAL YEAR
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Section 190.008(2)(a), Florida Statutes, the District
Manager has submitted to the Board of Supervisors(the"Board")a proposed budget for the next ensuing
budget year along with an explanation and a complete financial plan for each fund of the District,prior to
the fifteenth(15th)day in June,2019;and
WHEREAS, at least sixty(60)days prior to the adoption of the proposed annual budget and any
proposed long-term financial plan or program of the District for future operations(the"Proposed Budget)
the District did file a copy of the Proposed Budget with the general purpose local governing authorities
having jurisdiction over the area included in the District pursuant to the provisions of Section
190.008(2)(b),Florida Statutes;and
WHEREAS, on March 11, 2019, the Board set May 14, 2019 as the date for a public hearing
thereon and caused notice of such public hearing to be given by publication pursuant to Section
190.008(2)(a)Florida Statutes;and
WHEREAS, Section 190.008(2)(a), Florida Statutes requires that, prior to October 1 of each
year, the District Board by passage of the Annual Appropriation Resolution shall adopt a budget for the
ensuing fiscal year and appropriate such sums of money as the Board deems necessary to defray all
expenditures of the District during the ensuing fiscal year;and
WHEREAS,the District Manager has prepared a Proposed Budget on a Cash Flow Budget basis,
whereby the budget shall project the cash receipts and disbursements anticipated during a given time
period, including reserves for contingencies for emergency or other unanticipated expenditures during the
fiscal year;and
WHEREAS, Section 190.021, Florida Statutes provides that the Annual Appropriation
Resolution shall also fix the Maintenance Special Assessments and Benefit Special Assessments upon
each piece of property within the boundaries of the District benefited, specifically and peculiarly,by the
maintenance and/or capital improvement programs of the District, such levy representing the amount of
District assessments necessary to provide for payment during the ensuing budget year of all properly
authorized expenditures to be incurred by the District, including principal and interest of special revenue,
capital improvement and/or benefit assessment bonds, in order for the District to exercise its various
general and special powers to implement its single and specialized infrastructure provision purpose; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of the Cedar Hammock Community Development District
finds and determines that the non-ad valorem special assessments it imposes and levies on the parcels of
property by this Resolution for the operations of the District and the maintenance of its facilities will
constitute a mechanism by which the property owners lawfully and validly will reimburse the District for
those certain special and peculiar benefits the District has determined are received by, and flow to, the
parcels of property from the systems, facilities and services being provided, and that the special and
peculiar benefits are apportioned in a manner that is fair and reasonable in accordance with applicable
assessment methodology and related case law;and
WHEREAS, the Chair of the Board of Supervisors may designate the District Manager or other
person to certify the non-ad valorem assessment roll to the Tax Collector in and for Collier County
political subdivision on compatible electronic medium tied to the property identification number no later
than 15 September 2019 so that the Tax Collector may merge that roll with others into the collection roll
from which the November tax notice is to be printed and mailed;and
WHEREAS, the proceeds from the collections of these imposed and levied non-ad valorem
assessments shall be paid to the Cedar Hammock Community Development District; and
WHEREAS, the Tax Collector, under the direct supervision of the Florida Department of
Revenue performs the state work in preparing,mailing out,collecting and enforcing against delinquency
the non-ad valorem assessments of the District using the Uniform Collection Methodology for non-ad
valorem assessments; and
WHEREAS, if the Property Appraiser and the Tax Collector have adopted a different
technological procedure for certifying and merging the rolls,then that procedure must be worked out and
negotiated with Board approval through the auspices of the District Manager before there are any
deviations from the provisions of Section 197.3632, Fla. Stat., and Rule 12D-18, Florida Administrative
Code.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS OF CEDAR HAMMOCK COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT;
Section 1. The provisions of the whereas clauses are true and correct and are incorporated herein as
dispositive.
Section 2. Budget
a. That the Board of Supervisors has reviewed the District Manager's Proposed Budget, a copy of
which is on file with the office of the District Treasurer and the office of the Recording
Secretary, and is hereby attached to this resolution, and hereby approves the Proposed Budget
subject to amendments made at the public hearing,if any.
b. That the District Manager's Proposed Budget, as amended by the Board, is adopted hereby in
accordance with the provisions of Section 190.008(2)(a), Florida Statutes and incorporated
herein by reference; provided, however, that the comparative figures contained in the adopted
budget may he revised subsequently as deemed necessary by the District Manager to reflect
actual revenues and expenditures for the Fiscal Year 2019 and/or revised projections for Fiscal
Year 2020.
c. That the adopted budget, as amended, shall be maintained in the office of the District Treasurer
and the District Recording Secretary and identified as "The Budget for the Cedar Hammock
Community Development District for the Fiscal Year Ending September 30,2020,as Adopted by
the Board of Supervisors on May 14,2019."
Section 3. Appropriations
That there be,and hereby is appropriated out of the revenues of the Cedar Hammock Community
Development District,for the Fiscal Year beginning October 1,2019, and ending September 30,2020 the
sum of One Million Five Hundred Fifty-Two Thousand Thirty-Four to be raised by the applicable
imposition and levy by the Board of non-ad valorem special assessments and otherwise, which sum is
deemed by the Board of Supervisors to be necessary to defray all expenditures of the District during said
budget year,to be divided and appropriated in the following fashion:
TOTAL GENERAL FUND $ 1,552,034
DEBT SERVICE FUND $ 0
Total All Funds $ 1,552,034
Section 4. Supplemental Appropriations
The Board may authorize by resolution supplemental appropriations or revenue changes for any
lawful purpose from funds on hand or estimated to be received within the fiscal year as follows:
a. Board may authorize a transfer of the unexpended balance or portion thereof of any appropriation
item.
b. Board may authorize an appropriation from the unappropriated balance of any fund.
c. Board may increase any revenue or income budget account to reflect receipt of any additional
unbudgeted monies and make the corresponding change to appropriations or the unappropriated
balance.
The District Manager and Treasurer shall have the power within a given fund to authorize the
transfer of any unexpended balance of any appropriation item or any portion thereof, provided such
transfers do not exceed Ten Thousand ($10,000) Dollars or have the effect of causing more than 10% of
the total appropriation of a given program or project to be transferred previously approved transfers
included. Such transfer shall not have the effect of causing a more than $10,000 or 10% increase,
previously approved transfers included, to the original budget appropriation for the receiving program.
Transfers within a program or project may be approved by the applicable department director and the
District Manager or Treasurer. The District Manager or Treasurer must establish administrative
procedures, which require information on the request forms proving that such transfer requests comply
with this section.
Section 5. Maintenance and Benefit Special Assessment Levy: Fixed and Referenced and to be
Levied by the Board
a. That the Fiscal Year 2020 Maintenance and Benefit Special Assessment Levies (the "assessment
levy") for the assessment upon all the property within the boundaries of the District based upon
the special and peculiar benefit received and further based upon reasonable and fair
apportionment of the special benefit, shall be in accordance with the attached Exhibit A, which
levy represents the amount of District assessments necessary to provide for payment during the
aforementioned budget year of all properly authorized expenditures to be incurred by the District,
including principal and interest of special revenue, capital improvement and/or benefit
assessment bonds. Said assessment levy shall be distributed as follows:
General Fund 0&M $ [See Assessment Levy Resolution 2019-10]
Debt Service Fund $ [See Assessment Levy Resolution 2019-10]
b. The designee of the Chair of the Board of Supervisors of the Cedar Hammock Community
Development District shall be the Manager or the Treasurer of the District designated to certify
the non-ad valorem assessment roll to the Tax Collector in and for the Collier County political
subdivision, in accordance with applicable provisions of State law (Chapters 170, 190 and 197,
Fla. Stat.) and applicable rules (Rule 12D-18, Florida Administrative Code) which shall include
not only the maintenance special assessment levy but also the total for the debt service levy, as
required by and pursuant to law.
Introduced,considered favorably,and adopted this 14th day of May,2019.
Cedar Hammock Community Development District
Norman Day /
Chairman
Attest:
J9E/ Faircloth
. cretary
RESOLUTION 2019-10
A RESOLUTION LEVYING AND IMPOSING A NON AD
VALOREM MAINTENANCE AND BENEFIT SPECIAL
ASSESSMENT FOR THE CEDAR HAMMOCK COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2020
Preamble
WHEREAS, the Cedar Hammock Community Development District owns certain improvements
and facilities incurs costs of operation,repairs and maintenance;and
WHEREAS,the Board of Supervisors of the Cedar Hammock Community Development District
find that the District's total General Fund operation assessments, taking into consideration other revenue
sources during Fiscal Year 2020,will amount to$1,605,693;and
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of the Cedar Hammock Community Development District
finds the District's Debt Service Fund Assessment during Fiscal Year 2020 will amount to$0;and
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of the Cedar Hammock Community Development District
finds that the maintenance and benefit non-ad valorem special assessments it levies and imposes by this
resolution for operations, repair and maintenance will reimburse the District for certain special and
peculiar benefits received by the property subject to the assessment flowing from the operations, repair
and maintenance of the systems, facilities and services provided by the District and are apportioned in a
manner that is fair and reasonable, in accordance with the applicable assessment methodology;and
WHEREAS, the District Board understands that this resolution levies the maintenance and
benefit assessments for 2020 and the Chair of the District, or his designee, the District Manager, shall
certify a total non-ad valorem assessment roll in a timely manner to the Tax Collector in and for Collier
County for collection to include all assessments levied and approved by the District.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS OF THE CEDAR HAMMOCK COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT OF COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA;
Section 1. All the whereas clauses are incorporated herein and are dispositive.
Section 2. A special assessment for maintenance as provided for in Section 190.021(3),
Florida Statutes,and a special assessment for the exercise of the District's powers as provided for in
Section 190.021(2), Florida Statutes (hereinafter referred to as Assessments) are hereby levied on the
platted lots within the District.
Section 3. That the collection and enforcement of the aforesaid Assessments on platted lots
shall be by the Tax Collector serving as agent of the State of Florida in Collier County (Tax Collector)
and shall he at the same time and in like manner as ad valorem taxes and subject to all ad valorem tax
collection and enforcement procedures which attend the use of the official annual tax notice.
Section 4. The levy and imposition of the Assessments on platted lots included in the
District will be certified as a total amount on the non-ad valorem assessment roll to the Collier County
Tax Collector by the designee of the Chair of the Board on compatible medium no later than 15
September 2018, and shall then be collected by the'lax Collector on the tax notice along with other non-
ad valorem assessments from other local governments and with all applicable property taxes to each
platted parcel of property.
Section 5. The proceeds therefrom shall be paid to the Cedar Hammock Community
Development District.
Section 6. The Chair of the Board of the Cedar Hammock Community Development
District designates the District Manager to perform the certification duties.
Section 7. Be it further resolved, that a copy of this Resolution be transmitted to the proper
public officials so that its purpose and effect may be carried out in accordance with law.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 14th' of May, 2019, by the Board of Supervisors of the Cedar Hammock
Community Development District,Collier County,Florida.
i
61,"
Norman Day
(8rctary Chairman
Agenda Page 59
Camino'
Shaping the Future
April 11, 2019
South Florida Water Management District Cardno
Regulation Water Use
Attn: Mr. Scott Korf 5670 Zip Drive
P.O. Box 24680 Fort Myers,FL 33905
West Palm Beach, Florida 33416-4680 USA
RE: Cedar Hammock Phone: +1 239 574 1919
SFWMD Permit#11-01711-W Fax: +1 239 574 8106
Cardno Project#RT21611300
www.cardno.com
Dear Scott:
The monthly water elevation and quality data required for the above referenced permit are
enclosed.
Should you have any comments or questions, or require additional information, please do not
hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
Stephan P. Kohlmeier
Water Resource Analyst
for Cardno
Direct Line: (239)246-4813
Email: stephan.kohlmeiercardno.com
SPK/gng
Enc: Quarterly Report of Monitoring Requirements
cc: Justin Faircloth, Inframark
Todd Legan,Cedar Hammock
Z:\Project Files\AAA-Hydro Sites\Cedar Hammock\LETTER.DOC
Agenda kiYe 1:5)f
1
t2019-
South Florida Water Management District Confirm a2-05tion 07:13:07
02-05 07:13:07
Monitoring Report for Water Use Permit
Permit Number: 11-01711-W
Submittal Number:86542
Project Name: CEDAR HAMMOCK
GOLF AND COUNTRY CLUB
Issued To: Cedar Hammock Golf& If you have questions or need assistance,
CC please contact us at wucompliance@sfwmd.gov
Address: null
City,State,Zip: nullnulinull
Phone/Fax: 239 304 2898
E-mail:
Contact Corrections: None
Name of Person Completing the form:Steve Phone Date:2/5/2019
Ko h lmeie r N umbe r:239-246-4813 >>
Date of Data Ground
No Type Entity Name District ID Collection Chloride Water n
(mm/dd/yyyy) Level
1 SOURCE On-site Lake(s) 100404 01/31/2019 76 N/A
2 WELL MW-1 258516 01/31/2019 80 5.82
3 WELL MW-2 258517 01/31/2019 72 4.61
4 WELL MW-3 258518 01/31/2019 62 5.87
5 WELL MW-4 258519 01/31/2019 78 5.1
6 WELL 1 30124 01/31/2019 80 N/A
7 WELL 2 30126 01/31/2019 180 N/A
8 WELL 4 30130 01/31/2019 196 N/A V
9 WELL 6 30134 01/31/2019 220 N/A
Comments:
Entity District Reporting Unit
No Type Entity Name ID Period Description Comments
(mmlddlyyyy)
hitn•//mv cfwmrl anv/WatPrTiceCmmnliance/r.ardnn//11-01711-W Mnnitorina Received 20... 2./5/2019
Page 1 of 1
Agenda Page 61
t2019-
South Florida Water Management District
Confirmation02 21 09:18:49
02-21 09:18:49
Monitoring Report for Water Use Permit
Permit Number: 11-01711-W
Submittal Number: 87104
Project Name: CEDAR HAMMOCK
GOLF AND COUNTRY CLUB
Issued To: Cedar Hammock Golf& If you have questions or need assistance,
CC please contact us at wucomplianceAsfwmd.gov
Address: null
City,State,Zip: nulinulinull
Phone/Fax: 239 304 2898
E-mail:
Contact Corrections: None
Name of Person Completing the form:Steve Phone Date:2/21/2019
Kohlmeier Number:239-246-4813
Date of Data Ground
No Entity Entity Name District ID Collection Chloride Water n
Type (mm/dd/yyyy) Level
1 SOURCE On-site Lake(s) 100404 02/20/2019 90 N/A
2 WELL MW-1 258516 02/20/2019 82 5.93
3 WELL MW-2 258517 02/20/2019 80 4.78
4 WELL MW-3 258518 02/20/2019 82 5.88
5 WELL MW-4 258519 02/20/2019 120 5.14
6 WELL 1 30124 02/20/2019 200 N/A
7 WELL 2 30126 02/20/2019 164 N/A
8 WELL 4 30130 02/20/2019 220 N/A u
9 WELL 6 30134 02/20/2019 220 N/A
< >
Comments:
Entity District Reporting Unit
No Type Entity Name ID Period Description Comments
(mm/dd/yyyy)
httn://mv.sfwmd.gov/WaterUseCompliance/eardno//11-01711-W Monitoring Received 2... 2/21/2019
Agenda 13§0 1
South Florida Water Management District
Confirmation 3-1906:30:04
03-19 06:30:04
Monitoring Report for Water Use Permit
Permit Number: 11-01711-W
Submittal Number: 87880
Project Name: CEDAR HAMMOCK
GOLF AND COUNTRY CLUB
Issued To: Cedar Hammock Golf& If you have questions or need assistance,
CC please contact us at wucompiiance@sfwmd.gov
Address: null
City,State,Zip: nullnullnull
Phone I Fax: 239 304 2898
E-mail:
Contact Corrections: None
Name of Person Completing the form:Steve Phone
Kohlmeier Number:239-246-4813 ">' Date:3/19/2019
Date of Data Ground
No Type Entity Name District ID Collection Chloride Water "N
(mm/ddlyyyy) Level
1 SOURCE On-site Lake(s) 100404 03/13/2019 90 N/A
2 WELL MW-1 258516 03/13/2019 86 6.55
3 WELL MW-2 258517 03/13/2019 78 5.31
4 WELL MW-3 258518 03/13/2019 76 6.45
5 WELL MW-4 258519 03/13/2019 58 5.7
6 WELL 1 30124 03/13/2019 200 N/A
7 WELL 2 30126 03/13/2019 160 N/A
8 WELL 4 30130 03/13/2019 240 N/A V
9 WELL 6 30134 03/13/2019 280 N/A
< >
Comments:
Entity District Reporting Unit
No Type Entity Name ID Period Description Comments
(mm/ddlyyyy)
, .. ,r , nrr , rr r7 I- i I.. _ ,ii , nlfli l 111 LA_..t1...• _. n---=---- 0 fliiniflnln
Agenda Page 64
Cardno®
Shaping the Future
May 2, 2019
Cardno
Justin Faircloth 5670 Zip Drive
District Manager Fort Myers,FL 33905
Cedar Hammock Community Development District USA
c/o INFRAMARK
Pho19
5911 Country Lakes Drive Faxne. *1 239 574+1 239 574 8106
Fort Myers, Florida 33905
www.cardno.com
Subject: Proposal to Provide Hydrogeologic Services
Cedar Hammock Golf and Country Club
Irrigation Water Use Permit No.11-01711-W
Collier County, Florida
Dear Mr. Faircloth:
Cardno, Inc. (Cardno) is pleased to provide this proposal for hydrogeologic services for the
Cedar Hammock Golf and Country Club located in Collier County, Florida.
Cedar Hammock Golf and Country Club maintains an Irrigation Water Use Permit(No. 11-
01711-W)which expires on January 26, 2020.As part of the permit's Limiting Conditions, a
wetland hydrobiologic monitoring program was required. Limiting Condition 17 of the permit
specified the monitoring requirements for the program. Ecologists had monitored the wetland
annually for five years.At the completion of the fifth annual wetland monitoring, results had
shown that there were no substantial impacts resulting from the permitted irrigation usage.
The South Florida Water Management District(SFWMD)had recently inquired regarding the
submission of a wetland monitoring report for 2018.As the five-year monitoring term had been
completed prior to 2018 and the results had shown no adverse impacts, a letter modification
request was submitted to the SFWMD to remove the Limiting Condition 17 requirements for
wetland hydrobiologic monitoring from the permit.
After reviewing the letter modification request, Brad Cook, SFWMD Permitting Section Leader,
contacted us and requested that the letter modification request be withdrawn and that the
request be included as part of the renewal application process. The application was withdrawn
as a courtesy to the District to allow the SFWMD to undertake the renewal and modification as
one process.Additionally,the withdrawal would allow time for the SFWMD's environmental staff
to inspect the wetland.
Cardno is proposing to prepare and submit the water use permit renewal package and request
the removal of the Limiting Condition 17 wetland monitoring requirements. Cardno will
coordinate with District environmental staff to conduct wetland inspections and will provide all
available water level monitoring data necessary in support of removing the wetland monitoring
requirements from the permit.
Australia • Belgium • Canada • Ecuador • Indonesia • Kenya • New Zealand • Papua New Guinea
Peru • United Arab Emirates • United Kingdom • United States • Operations in 70 countries
Agenda Page 65
Mr.Justin Faircloth 2 ( Cardno6
Cedar Hammock Shaping the Future
May 2,2019
The cost to provide these services is$6,750.00 and does not include the$1,000.00 SFWMD permit application
review fee. The cost includes all required supplemental materials and one response to a request for additional
information to clarify submitted data, exclusive of impact analyses(computer modeling), field work,and other work
items not specified in this proposal requested by the SFWMD as a result of their permit review process.
It should be noted that all permitted withdrawal facilities are in place and that there will be no changes requested to
the irrigated acreage or permitted allocations. Based on these factors we do not anticipate the requirement of ,
computer modeling or field work beyond the coordination with SFWMD environmental staff.
Cardno appreciates the opportunity to provide a Scope of Services for hydrogeologic services on your behalf.
Please find attached a Professional Services Agreement. If this proposal is acceptable, please execute two copies
of the Agreement, retain one for your files, and return the other to Cardno.
Should you have any comments or questions,or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact
us.
Sincerely,
J
Gary Susdorf Stephan P. Kohlmeier
Hydrogeologist/Senior Project Scientist Water Resource Analyst
for Cardno Cardno
Direct Line: 239.829.7025 Direct Line: 239.829.7011
Email: gary.susdorfAcardno.corn Email: stephan.kohlmeierancardno.com
Enc: Professional Services Agreement
File: Z:\Project Files\Clients A—D\Cedar Hammock\Proposals\gs_chcddjf pro
www.cardno.com
A A
ya
Jz, § kS S.. rK
r
Cardno Contract ID I Project ID:TBD
This Agreement is made effective May 2, 2019 by and between:
"Cardno"
Name: Cardno, Inc.
Address: 5670 Zip Drive, Fort Myers, FL 33905
Phone: 239-829-7025
Representative: Gary Susdorf Email: gary.susdorf@cardno.com
"Client"
Name: Cedar Hammock Community Development District c/o INFRAMARK
Address: 5911 Country Lakes Drive, Fort Myers, Florida 33905
Phone: 239-245-7118, ext. 306
Representative: Justin Faircloth Email: Justin.Faircloth@inframark.com
The Scope of Services, Special Conditions, Terms, and Conditions constitute the complete agreement between
Cardno and Client with respect to the scope of services hereunder.
Project Name/Location: Cedar Hammock Golf and Country Club Water Use Permit Renewal, Naples, FL
Fee Type: Lump Sum, Percent Complete
Retainer: A retainer in the amount of$0.00 will be paid to Cardno upon contract execution
and prior to the start of work. The retained amount will be credited on the final
invoice(s)for services contracted under this Agreement.
Estimated Budget: $6,750.00 lump sum
Scope of Services:
Refer to May 2,2019 proposal.
Special Conditions:
Does not include agency review fees.
A3—Cardno Professional Services Agreement—Short Form Agreement Page 1 of 1
2017 V3
11
C,.,'7 Cardno g - ;
NOW,THEREFORE, Cardno shall perform the services outlined in this Agreement for the stated fee in accordance
with these terms and conditions:
ARTICLE 1:ACCESS TO SITE(if applicable)
Upon execution of this Agreement,the Client represents that they have secured legal rights to access the property
and authorizes Cardno staff to access the site for activities necessary for the performance of the services.
ARTICLE 2: PAYMENT
a. Cardno will submit invoices to Client monthly for services provided during the previous month. Each invoice
will identify the project name and cost of the services provided. Cardno's rates are subject to increase
annually.
b. Within thirty (30) days following Client's receipt of each invoice rendered by Cardno pursuant to this
Agreement, Client will pay the amount invoiced. Retainers/deposits shall be credited on the final invoice If
Client disputes any portion of an invoice; Client will notify Cardno in writing of such disputed items within 10
days of invoice date. In the event any invoice has not been paid in full within sixty (60) days of the invoice
date, Cardno may immediately suspend all or any portion of the Services hereunder indefinitely, pending
payment in full of such invoice(s).
c. Interest will accrue on accounts overdue by 30 days at the lesser of 1.5 percent per month (18 percent per
annum) or the maximum legal rate of interest allowable. Collection fees and any additional legal costs
associated with the recovery of outstanding payments may also be applied
ARTICLE 3: INDEMNIFICATION
Cardno and Client shall indemnify and hold harmless each other from and against damages, liabilities, costs and
expenses, including but not limited to reimbursement of reasonable attorney fees arising out of damages or injuries
to persons or property to the extent caused by the negligence, gross negligence or willful misconduct by the other
party or anyone acting under its direction or control or on its behalf in the course of its performance under this
Agreement; provided that each party's aforesaid indemnity agreement shall not be applicable to any liability based
upon willful misconduct or negligence of the other party. In no event shall either party be responsible for any form
of consequential damages, including, but not limited to loss of sales, loss of profits,and attorney fees thereon. For
purposes of this Paragraph, the duty to indemnify does not include the duty to pay for or to provide an up-front
defense against unproven claims or allegations. Where any claim results from the joint negligence, gross
negligence or willful misconduct by Client and Cardno, the amount of such damage for which Client or Cardno is
liable as indemnitor under this Paragraph shall equal the proportionate part that the amount of such claim
attributable to such indemnitor's negligence,gross negligence or willful misconduct bears to the amount of the total
claim attributable to the joint negligence, gross negligence or willful misconduct at issue.
ARTICLE 4: LIMITATION OF LIABILITIES
Notwithstanding any other provision in this Agreement,the Client agrees to strictly limit Cardno's liability under this
Agreement or arising from the performance or non-performance of the Services under any theory of law, including
but not limited to claims for negligence, negligent misrepresentation and breach of contract, to the lesser of five
times the fees paid to Cardno for the Services or the maximum of insurance provided. No claim may be brought
against Cardno in contract or tort more than two(2)years after the cause of action arose.Any claim, suit, demand
or action brought under this Agreement shall be directed and/or asserted only against Cardno and not against any
of Cardno's employees, shareholders, officers or directors. Cardno's liability with respect to any claims arising out
of this Agreement shall be limited as provided herein to direct damages arising out of the performance of the
Services and Cardno shall not be held responsible or liable whatsoever for any consequential damages, injury or
damage incurred by the actions or inactions of the Client, including but not limited to claims for loss of use, loss of
profits and loss of markets
ARTICLE 5:TERMINATION:
This Agreement will continue in effect until terminated by either party upon thirty (30) days written notice to the
other party. In the event of any termination, Cardno shall be paid for all services rendered and reimbursables
incurred through the date of notice of termination. In the event of termination, the Client shall pay all additional
A3—Cardno Professional Services Agreement—Short Form Agreement Page 2 of 4
Z\Project Files\Clients A-DlCedar Hammock1Proposalslgs_chcddjt_agreementdocx 2017 V3
,42e4 7k1S0'. "-..1COAXWV h-74,04,1-fikKVSA:OVVAtfit
Li
) Cardno
4.
costs reasonably related to termination of the project and a proportionate amount of the consideration hereunder
commensurate with the portion of the project accomplished.
ARTICLE 6: FORCE MAJEURE
Any suspension, temporary or permanent, in the performance of this Agreement caused by any of the following
events and without fault or negligence on the part of the defaulting party shall not constitute a breach of contract:
labor strikes, riots, war, acts of governmental authorities, unusually severe weather conditions or other natural
catastrophic events, or any other similar event beyond the reasonable control or contemplation of either party.
ARTICLE 7:ASSIGNMENT
Neither party to this Agreement shall, without the prior written consent, of the other party, which shall not be
unreasonably withheld, assign the benefit or in any way transfer any claim or obligation under this Agreement or
any part hereof. This Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the parties hereto, and except
as otherwise provided herein, upon their executors, administrators, successors, and assigns.
ARTICLE 8: OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS
All report documents produced by Cardno under this Agreement shall be made available to the Client upon receipt
of full payment for services rendered. Cardno shall retain ownership of all field notes, computer files and project
files used to produce the work products and may make copies of all work products.
ARTICLE 9: CONFIDENTIALITY
Cardno will maintain in confidence the nature of its Services, as well as all information made available to Cardno
by Client during the term of this Agreement or resulting from Services performed by Cardno under this Agreement.
The confidential obligation imposed on Cardno by Paragraph 9, however, will not extend to any such information
insofar as, and from such time as Cardno may disclose(i)as required by law, (ii)pursuant to court order, (iii)to its
subcontractors,agents or other representatives as may be reasonably necessary to perform its services hereunder
(iv) for the purpose of prosecuting or defending any litigation, or (v) Cardno can show by reasonable proof has
been in the public domain.Cardno agrees to use information intended to be kept confidential under this Paragraph
9 solely to provide its Services.
ARTICLE 10: NOTICES
Any notices or written statements hereunder shall be deemed to have been given when mailed by certified or
registered mail or via email,with receipt of reply, to the party entitled thereto at its address noted at the top of this
Agreement or at such other latest address as it may designate in writing to the other party for this purpose.
ARTICLE 11: NON-SOLICITATION
Neither party shall knowingly solicit, recruit, hire or otherwise employ or retain the employees of the other working
under this Agreement during the term of this Agreement and for one(1)year following the termination or expiration
of this Agreement without the prior written consent of the other party.
ARTICLE 12:WAIVER
Failure by one party to notify the other party of a breach of any provision of this Agreement shall not constitute a
waiver of any continuing breach. Failure by one party to enforce any of its rights under this Agreement shall not
constitute a waiver of those rights. The waiver by either party of a breach or violation of any provision of this
Agreement shall not operate as, or be construed to be, a waiver of any subsequent breach of the same or any
other provision hereof.
ARTICLE 13: GOVERNING LAW
The validity of this Agreement and any of its terms or provisions, as well as the rights and duties of the parties
hereunder, shall be interpreted and governed by the laws of the place of the project.
A3—Cardno Professional Services Agreement—Short Form Agreement Page 3 of 4
Z?Project Files\Clients A.DMCedar HammacktPraposalslgs_chcddjf agreementdocz 2017 V3
�w •�^3SPL�aYY$ 4 �c2 > 9. � .�q�� � k
Lir-) Cardno ^^,,_L Ff4••
a rgyp. 1
71041J.
ARTICLE 14: LEGAL CONSTRUCTION
In case any one or more of the provisions contained in this Agreement shall for any reason be held to be invalid or
unenforceable in any respect, such invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect any other provision hereof. This
Agreement shall be construed as if such invalid or unenforceable provision had never been contained herein.
ARTICLE 15: ENTIRE AGREEMENT
This Agreement supersedes any and all other agreements, either oral or in writing, between the parties relating to
the subject matter of this Agreement and is the entire understanding and agreement related thereto. This
Agreement may be amended by mutual consent of the parties in writing to be attached hereto and incorporated
herein, executed by Cardno's and the Client's respective representatives.
Cedar Hammock Community Development
Cardno, Inc. District c/o INFRAMARK
By: 0 ft./A/ /it, By:
Print Print
Name: Gary Susdorf Name:
Title: Hydrogeologist/Senior Project Scientist Title:
Date:May 2, 2019 Date:
A3—Cardno Professional Services Agreement—Short Form Agreement Page 4 of 4
ZiProjecl Fiks\Clients A.DlCedar Hammock\Proposalslgs chctltljt_agreementoocc 2017 V3
Agenda Page 92
CEDAR HAMMOCK
Community Development District
Financial Report
March 31, 2019
Prepared by:
N F�R�A�M,.A RYK
CEDAR HAMMOCK Agenda Page 93
Community Development District
Table of Contents
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Pages
Balance Sheet 1
General Fund 2-3
SUPPORTING SCHEDULES
Non-Ad Valorem Special Assessments 3-4
Cash and Investment Report 5
Suntrust Bank Reconciliation 6
Valley National Bank Reconciliation 7
Check Register 8
Agenda Page 94
CEDAR HAMMOCKS
Community Development District
Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
March 31, 2019
II
CEDAR HAMMOCK Agenda Page 95
Community Development District General Fund
Balance Sheet
March 31, 2019
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION TOTAL
ASSETS
Cash-Checking Account $ 148,215
Investments:
Certificates of Deposit-18 Months 103,130
Money Market Account 724,398
Deposits 1,359
TOTAL ASSETS $ 977,102
LIABILITIES
Accounts Payable $ 13,054
Accrued Expenses 600
TOTAL LIABILITIES 13,654
FUND BALANCES
Nonspendable:
Deposits 1,359
Assigned to:
Operating Reserves 43,617
Reserves-Bridges 120,190
Reserves-Bulkheads 135,928
Reserves-Lakes 32,153
Reserves-Roadways 157,725
Unassigned: 472,476
TOTAL FUND BALANCES $ 963,448
TOTAL LIABILITIES&FUND BALANCES $ 977,102
Page 1
CEDAR HAMMOCK Agenda Page 96
Community Development District General Fund
Statement of Revenues,Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances
For the Period Ending March 31,2019
ANNUAL
ADOPTED YEAR TO DATE YEAR TO DATE VARIANCE(S)
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION BUDGET BUDGET ACTUAL FAV(UNFAV(
REVENUES
Interest-Investments $ 2,017 $ 1,009 $ 7,318 $ 6,309
Interest-Tax Collector - - 143 143
Special Assmnts-Tax Collector 379,523 366,224 360,172 (6,052)
Special Assmnts-Discounts (15,181) (14,651) (13,993) 658
Other Miscellaneous Revenues - - 8,406 8,406
1
TOTAL REVENUES 366,359 352,582 362,046 9,464
EXPENDITURES
Administration
ProfServ-Engineering 30,000 15,000 14,839 161
ProfServ-Legal Services 2,000 1,000 7,625 (6,625)
ProfServ-Mgmt Consulting Sery 38,404 19,202 20,014 (812)
ProfServ-Property Appraiser 5,693 5,693 5,693 -
ProfServ-Special Assessment 2,941 2,941 7,941 (5,000)
ProfServ-Web Site Maintenance 656 328 328 -
Auditing Services 5,000 - - -
Postage and Freight 765 383 1,950 (1,567)
Insurance-General Liability 7,959 7,959 7,000 959
Printing and Binding 2,246 1,123 793 330
Legal Advertising 2,394 1,197 1,505 (308)
Misc-Bank Charges 700 350 287 63
Misc-Assessmnt Collection Cost 7,590 7,440 6,924 516
Misc-Web Hosting 239 239 239 -
Office Supplies 400 200 - 200
Annual District Filing Fee 175 175 175 -
Total Administration 107,162 63,230 75,313 (12,083)
Page 2
CEDAR HAMMOCK Agenda Page 97
Community Development District General Fund
Statement of Revenues,Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances
For the Period Ending March 31,2019
ANNUAL
ADOPTED YEAR TO DATE YEAR TO DATE VARIANCE($)
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION BUDGET BUDGET ACTUAL FAV(UNFAV)
Field
ProfSery-Field Management 1,539 770 770 -
Contracts-Water Mgmt Services 7,200 3,600 3,600 -
Utility-Cameras 1,320 660 651 9
Electricity-Wells 3,000 1,500 980 520
Electricity-Aerator 2,000 1,000 760 240
R&M-Lake 3,000 1,500 3,113 (1,613)
R&M-Plant Replacement 3,015 1,508 - 1,508
R&M Bulkheads 8,000 8,000 8,000 -
R&M-Bridges&Cart Paths 8,000 4,000 - 4,000
Misc-Contingency 20,289 10,145 5,925 4,220
Capital Outlay 9,944 6,008 6,008 -
Reserve-Bridges 20,910 20,910 16,200 4,710
Reserve-Bulkheads 83,980 83,980 61,735 22,245
Reserve-Lakes 15,000 15,000 - 15,000
Reserve-Roadways 72,000 72,000 - 72,000
Total Field 259,197 230,581 107,742 122,839
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 366,359 293,811 183,055 110,756
Excess(deficiency)of revenues
Over(under)expenditures - 58,771 178,991 120,220
Net change in fund balance $ - $ 58,771 $ 178,991 $ 120,220
FUND BALANCE,BEGINNING(OCT 1,2018) 784,457 784,457 784,457
FUND BALANCE,ENDING $ 784,457 $ 843,228 $ 963,448
Page 3
Agenda Page 98
CEDAR HAMMOCKS
Community Development District
Supporting Schedules
March 31, 2019
CEDAR HAMMOCK Agenda Page 99
Community Development District
Non-Ad Valorem Special Assessments
(Collier County Tax Collector- Monthly Collection Distributions)
For the Fiscal Year Ending September 30, 2019
ALLOCATION
Discount/ County Gross
Date Net Amount (Penalties) Expense Amount General Fund
Received Received Amount Amount Received Assessments
Assessments Levied For FY 2019 $379,523 $ 379,523
Allocation % 100% 100%
11/01/18 42,900 1,824 876 45,600 45,600
11/08/18 3,422 194 70 3,686 3,686
11/19/18 130,936 5,567 2,672 139,175 139,175
11/26/18 78,204 3,325 1,596 83,125 83,125
12/24/18 55,235 2,292 1,127 58,654 58,654
01/24/19 22,501 677 459 23,637 23,637
02/18/19 6,058 114 124 6,295 6,295
TOTAL $ 339,256 $ 13,993 $ 6,924 $ 360,172 $ 360,172
COLLECTED 95% 95%
TOTAL OUTSTANDING $ 19,351 $ 19,351
Report Date:4/29/2019
Page 4
CEDAR HAMMOCK Agenda Page 100
Community Development District All Funds
Cash and Investment Report
March 39, 2019
General Fund
Account Name Bank Name Investment Type Maturity Yield Balance
Checking Account-Operating SunTrust Bank Public Funds NOW n/a 2.17% $ 680
Checking Account-Operating Valley National Bank Gov't Interest Checking n/a 2.20% 147,536
Certificate of Deposit-6089 BankUnited 18 month CD 9/9/19 1.80% 103,130
Money Market Account BankUnited Public Funds MMA n/a 1.75% 724,398
Total $ 975,743
Report Date:4/25/2019 Page 5
Cedar Hammock CDD Agenda Page 101
Bank Reconciliation
Bank Account No. 9995 SunTrust-GF-DO NOT USE
Statement No. 03-19
Statement Date 3/31/2019
G/L Balance(LCY) 679.66 Statement Balance 16,339.51
G/L Balance 679.66 Outstanding Deposits 0.00
Positive Adjustments 0.00
Subtotal 16,339.51 I
Subtotal 679.66 Outstanding Checks 15,859.85
Negative Adjustments 0.00 Differences 0.00
Ending G/L Balance 679.66 Ending Balance 679.66
Difference 0.00
Posting Document Document Cleared
Date Type No. Description Amount Amount Difference
Outstanding Checks
3/19/2019 Payment 002000 COMCAST BUSINESS 118.04 0.00 118.04
3/27/2019 Payment 002003 COLLIER COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR 32.93 0.00 32.93
3/27/2019 Payment 002004 FEDEX 13.58 0.00 13.58
3/29/2019 Payment 002005 BANKS ENGINEERING INC 4,754 05 0.00 4,754.05
3/29/2019 Payment 002006 DANIEL H.COX,P.A. 1,540.00 0.00 1,540.00
3/29/2019 Payment 002007 INFRAMARK,LLC 9,201.25 0.00 9,201.25
Total Outstanding Checks 15,659.85 15,859.85
Page 6
Cedar Hammock CDD Agenda Page 102
Bank Reconciliation
Bank Account No. 2555 Valley National Bank-GF
Statement No. 03/19
Statement Date 3/31/2019
G/L Balance(LCY) 147,535.62 Statement Balance 147,535.62
G/L Balance 147,535.62 Outstanding Deposits 0,00
Positive Adjustments 0.00
Subtotal 147,535.62
Subtotal 147,535.62 Outstanding Checks 0.00
Negative Adjustments 0.00 Differences 0.00
Ending G/L Balance 147,535.62 Ending Balance 147,53562
Difference 0.00
Posting Document Document Cleared
Date Type No. Description Amount Amount Difference
11
Page 7
8 co r, r O O M a0 o O M .n s O _N
M N (0 N O U) O m (0 0 0 (0 (0 M N O 0) N N
D:) O ai [D g (V od m oO (V M •V O .1 ..l7 O m O ri g
oC O N N fA tt)77 69 fA . N (D Mt+9 69 n U) U 69 N r W 0 c)7 T. cr. V
E f0 77 H9 (,j fA ER fA ffl rj EA fA uj fA fA
Q a va c (» . . CV
0 0
_O i9 Q)
OI
N ,— a
0 )
M
0.
a
03 t
'0 z d
C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Q) •CO N (N N M M CO N C) N M M l0 .- M M N M N M N M
To
Q J
N CV co 0 v 0 d) 0 8 co 0 (n CV 0) ( cd N co o F°- U
O N 0 0 0 0 0 CD O N O CD N N M 0 In
00000000 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a m
7MR 7 M CO
O7 M 'M V ., V uV 0, V ,7 2 2 M In N M M 7
F-
4 m • mco z
o c
n m
Y azi a� 8 m E
U •E E C 0 C y
m R O) 'l0 8 •ni 5' m 3 ON)
C v
0J Q @ O) m 2 O) Q) 5 C 0 d 2 d Q O
0 vJ M 63 2 x 2 E m d N d CUUJ 2 UU m m
E -0 u_ .0 LL m LL LL LL C ip LL t -o E .a d
o m 3 m m m W` 3 m 2 ii' 2 ,
' U ani U)) s o U Fogg g 2 A a) 2 2 2 2 .,
T 0 0 l0 (n W >. lD N W m cn c9 co (n co Cn
oeoe8" � o888 ' � 000 ' 0
5 a a a a a D a U a a a a a a a a a a W W
adiv
C en c7
411./
y o 0) 0) :..I- rn
N
Y ++ c ' 00 z 03
a " woo q ,- 0C Owwwwwwrnrn
OL' C Z to 0 W W W W 6 a O < 5 W W W W W W
O « LL LL LL LL O M ~ F- O ce a a LL LL LL LL 4 4
>`°' V o Z Z Z Z ") m N ,...2 O .- Z cn Z Z Z Z Z Z N N
I-
21. a et.r Cr E x 2 2 22 g a N (� >- aJ M w < 222222
U.1 a a
tll u m 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O 2 0 0 Z 0 0 (7 0 0 (7 0 O U
et � ami E V a .tr., «,c w •o XXw O w z z z z LL- w
0 a a a Q U 0 U O a U z W a a a a a a U U
Ce Q T (N 2 2 ( j j 2 t 5 W LL 2 2 2 2 2 2 > 5
Qi .0 M 0 rn rn 0 EC M CY co m cC Z O m co co 0 o) co W CY
W
0 >,cy oaaaa0W) o0) mNccocW7ammM cwnw
W `° a) o ST
V 2 .c 0 r) a s
0 0 Lo M o
F, 0 IA In
0 a 3 A) ua 7, (7n n m ° o o) a rU) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c-.76
N 0 N to ID N p O c0 a0 V- V V- V V > j
V W W m O; O V co N O (0 N , t`) M M M M M z Z
W OJ Et
O
0
U
W
J
J
O U
m UX z
a n U ~ Z d
CY a
65 J J J 0 H 0 Z 0 J J J J J J
m Y Y Y U Z O OU Y Y `1 Z Y
COC') < < < < xx UIOCIDC ~) xx O w x WO W S Q a a Q Q Q U U
a % z [C W ° W a W W Y .-J
q22222 „r <
Q
J � tL lL tL LL lL
Q Z Z Z Z W O w U O Filw m o ii-Z Z Z Z ZI'L a LL
VII0 Q) 0) 0) D) O 0) 0) 0) 0) O) 0 W O) W 0 0) O 0) 0) 0) W
2 O O 0 O (o Q) O) 0 1,- r, 01
0)
0)
u OOO NNNNNNR0.1 r r
() M M M c') M M M Cl
CI 00000000000000000
O O O O
Z
_L Z U. 0)) o 00) T N O) O O O O o Lc)
O O n0 r.-
0 0 0 V V
L = J O O O O O O O c,1
N N N N O N N N O
c.) ‹
o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 8 8 g 888000
0 0 0 0 0
W
C
0 d . . . . . . . . .8888888880000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LL z CD 0 0 0 S 0 0 0
Notice of Meetings
Cedar Hammock
Community Development District
The Board of Supervisors of the Cedar Hammock Community Development District will
hold their meetings for Fiscal Year 2019 at the Cedar Hammock Clubhouse, 8660 Cedar
Hammock Boulevard, Naples, Florida at 2:00 p.m. on the second Monday of the following
months except as noted:
June 17,2019
July 15,2019
September 3,2019
There may he occasions when one or more Supervisors will participate by telephone.
Meetings may be continued to a date and time certain which will be announced at the meeting.
In accordance with the provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act, any person
requiring special accommodations at this meeting because of a disability or physical impairment
should contact the District Management Company, Inframark, Infrastructure Management
Services at(954)603-0033. If you are hearing or speech impaired,please contact the Florida
Relay Service at 7-1-1 for aid in contacting the District Office.
Each person who decides to appeal any action taken at these meetings is advised
that person will need a record of the proceedings and that accordingly, the person
may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, including
the testimony and evidence upon which such appeal is to be based.
Justin Faircloth
District Manager
Notice of Meetings
Cedar Hammock
Community Development District
The Board of Supervisors of the Cedar Hammock Community Development District will
hold their meetings for Fiscal Year 2019 at the Cedar Hammock Clubhouse, 8660 Cedar
Hammock Boulevard, Naples, Florida at 2:00 p.m. on the second Monday of the following
months except as noted:
June 17,2019
July 15,2019
September 3,2019
There may be occasions when one or more Supervisors will participate by telephone.
Meetings may be continued to a date and time certain which will be announced at the meeting.
In accordance with the provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act, any person
requiring special accommodations at this meeting because of a disability or physical impairment
should contact the District Management Company, Inframark, Infrastructure Management
Services at(954)603-0033. If you are hearing or speech impaired,please contact the Florida
Relay Service at 7-1-1 for aid in contacting the District Office.
Each person who decides to appeal any action taken at these meetings is advised
that person will need a record of the proceedings and that accordingly, the person
may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, including
the testimony and evidence upon which such appeal is to be based.
Justin Faircloth
District Manager
Notice of Meetings
Cedar Hammock
Community Development District
The Board of Supervisors of the Cedar Hammock Community Development District will
hold their meetings for Fiscal Year 2020 at the Cedar Hammock Clubhouse,8660 Cedar Hammock
Boulevard,Naples,Florida at 2:00 p.m. on the second Monday of the following months except as
noted:
October 15,2019
November 12,2019
December 9,2019
January 13,2020
February 10,2020
March 10,2020
April 13,2020
May 11,2020
There may be occasions when one or more Supervisors will participate by telephone.
Meetings may be continued to a date and time certain which will be announced at the meeting.
In accordance with the provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act, any person
requiring special accommodations at this meeting because of a disability or physical impairment
should contact the District Management Company, Inframark, Infrastructure Management
Services at(954)603-0033. If you are hearing or speech impaired,please contact the Florida
Relay Service at 7-1-1 for aid in contacting the District Office.
Each person who decides to appeal any action taken at these meetings is advised
that person will need a record of the proceedings and that accordingly, the person
may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, including
the testimony and evidence upon which such appeal is to be based.
Justin Faircloth
District Manager
Agenda Page 107
Cedar Hammock
Community Development District
ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT
September 30, 2018
Agenda Page 108
Cedar Hammock Community Development District
ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT
September 30, 2018
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Number
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS 1-2
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS 3-7
BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS:
Government-wide Financial Statements
Statement of Net Position 8
Statement of Activities 9
Fund Financial Statements:
Balance Sheet—General Fund 10
Reconciliation of Total Governmental Fund Balances to Net
Position of Governmental Activities 11
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund
Balances—General Fund 12
Reconciliation of the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and
Change in Fund Balances of Governmental Funds to the
Statement of Activities 13
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Change in Fund
Balances—Budget and Actual—General Fund 14
Notes to Financial Statements 15-23
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER
FINANCIAL REPORTING AND ON COMPLIANCE AND OTHER
MATTERS BASED ON AN AUDIT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNMENT AUDITING
STANDARDS 24-25
MANAGEMENT LETTER 26-27
INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANT'S REPORT/COMPLIANCE WITH
SECTION 218.415, FLORIDA STATUTES 28
Agenda Page 109
< Berger, Toombs, Elam,
-cGaines & Frank
Certified Public Accountants PL
600 Citrus Avenue
Suite 200
Fort Pierce, Florida 34950
772/461-6120//461-1155
FAX: 772/468-9278
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
To the Board of Supervisors
Cedar Hammock Community Development District
Collier County, Florida
Report on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying financial statements of Cedar Hammock Community
Development District as of and for the year ended September 30, 2018, and the related notes to
financial statements, which collectively comprise the District's basic financial statements as
listed in the table of contents.
Management's Responsibility for the Financial Statements
Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these financial
statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America; this includes the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant
to the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements that are free from material
misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
Auditor's Responsibility
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United
States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government
Accounting Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about
whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement.
An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor's
judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial
statements; whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor
considers internal control relevant to the entity's preparation and fair presentation of the
financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the
circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the
entity's internal control. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes
evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of
significant accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
presentation of the financial statements.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a
basis for our audit opinion.
Fort Pierce/Stuart
Member AICPA Member AICP# IJggivtsion For CPA Firms Member FICPA
Private Companies Practice Section
Agenda Page 110
Berger,Toombs, Elam,
Gaines&Frank
toan.d Public�o.w. rl
III
To the Board of Supervisors
Cedar Hammock Community Development District
Opinion
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects,
the respective financial position of the governmental activities and the General Fund of Cedar
Hammock Community Development District, as of September 30, 2018, and the respective
changes in financial position and the budgetary comparison for the General Fund for the year
then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America.
Other Matters
Required Supplementary Information
Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that the
Management Discussion and Analysis be presented to supplement the basic financial
statements. Such information, although not a part of the basic financial statements, is required
by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board who considers it to be an essential part of
financial reporting for placing the basic financial statements in an appropriate operational,
economic, or historical context. We have applied certain limited procedures to the required
supplementary information in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the
United States of America, which consisted of inquiries of management about the methods of
preparing the information and comparing the information for consistency with management's
responses to our inquiries, the basic financial statements, and other knowledge we obtained
during our audit of the basic financial statements. We do not express an opinion or provide any
assurance on the information because the limited procedures do not provide us with sufficient
evidence to express an opinion or provide any assurance.
Other Reporting Required by Government Auditing Standards
In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report dated April
26, 2019 on our consideration of the District's internal control over financial reporting and on our
tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations and contracts. The purpose
of that report is to describe the scope of our testing of internal control over financial reporting
and compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on internal control
over financial reporting or on compliance. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in
accordance with Government Auditing Standards in considering Cedar Hammock Community
Development District's internal control over financial reporting and compliance.
Berger, Toombs, Elam, Gaines& Frank
Certified Public Accountants PL
Fort Pierce, Florida
April 26, 2019
- 2 -
Agenda Page 111
Cedar Hammock Community Development District
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
For the Year Ended September 30, 2018
Management's discussion and analysis of Cedar Hammock Community Development District
(the "District") financial performance provides an objective and easily readable analysis of the
District's financial activities. The analysis provides summary financial information for the District
and should be read in conjunction with the District's financial statements.
OVERVIEW OF THE FINANACIAL STATEMENTS
The District's basic financial statements comprise three components; 1) Government-wide
financial statements, 2) Fund financial statements, and 3) Notes to financial statements. The
Government-wide financial statements present an overall picture of the District's financial
position and results of operations. The Fund financial statements present financial information
for the District's major funds. The Notes to financial statements provide additional information
concerning the District's finances.
The Government-wide financial statements are the statement of net position and the
statement of activities. These statements use accounting methods similar to those used by
private-sector companies. Emphasis is placed on the net position of governmental activities
and the change in net position. Governmental activities are primarily supported by special
assessments.
The statement of net position presents information on all assets and liabilities of the District,
with the difference between assets and liabilities reported as net position. Net position are
reported in two categories; invested in capital assets, net of related debt, and unrestricted.
Assets, liabilities and net position are reported for all Governmental activities.
The statement of activities presents information on all revenues and expenses of the District
and the change in net position. Expenses are reported by major function and program revenues
relating to those functions are reported, providing the net cost of all functions provided by the
District. To assist in understanding the District's operations, expenses have been reported as
governmental activities. Governmental activities financed by the District include general
government, physical environment and interest on long term debt.
Fund financial statements present financial information for governmental funds. These
statements provide financial information for the major governmental funds of the District.
Governmental fund financial statements provide information on the current assets and liabilities
of the funds, changes in current financial resources (revenues and expenditures), and current
available resources.
- 3-
Agenda Page 112
Cedar Hammock Community Development District
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
For the Year Ended September 30, 2018
OVERVIEW OF THE FINANACIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
Fund financial statements include a balance sheet and a statement of revenues,
expenditures and changes in fund balances for all governmental funds. A statement of
revenues,expenditures, and changes in fund balances—budget and actual, is provided for
the District's General Fund. Fund financial statements provide more detailed information about
the District's activities. Individual funds are established by the District to track revenues that are
restricted to certain uses or to comply with legal requirements.
The government-wide financial statements and the fund financial statements provide different
pictures of the District. The government-wide financial statements provide an overall picture of
the District's financial standing. These statements are comparable to private-sector companies
and give a good understanding of the District's overall financial health and how the District paid
for the various activities, or functions, provided by the District. All assets of the District,
including buildings, land, roads, bridges, and traffic signals are reported in the statement of net
position. All liabilities, including principal outstanding on bonds, are included. The statement
of activities includes depreciation on all long-lived assets of the District, but transactions
between the different functions of the District have been eliminated in order to avoid "doubling
up" the revenues and expenses. The fund financial statements provide a picture of the major
funds of the District. In the case of governmental activities, outlays for long lived assets are
reported as expenditures and long-term liabilities, such as general obligation bonds, are not
included in the fund financial statements. To provide a link from the fund financial statements to
the government-wide financial statements, a reconciliation is provided from the fund financial
statements to the government-wide financial statements.
Notes to financial statements provide additional detail concerning the financial activities and
financial balances of the District. Additional information about the accounting practices of the
District, investments of the District, capital assets and long-term debt are some of the items
included in the notes to financial statements.
Financial Highlights:
The following are the highlights of financial activity for the year ended September 30, 2018.
• The District's total assets exceeded total liabilities by $13,887,500 (net position).
Unrestricted net position for Governmental Activities was $784,457. Net investment in
capital assets was$13,103,043.
• Governmental Activities revenues totaled $374,766 while governmental activities
expenses totaled $457,644.
-4-
Agenda Page 113
Cedar Hammock Community Development District
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
For the Year Ended September 30, 2018
OVERVIEW OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
Financial Analysis of the District
The following schedule provides a summary of the assets, liabilities and net position of the
District and is presented by category for comparison purposes.
Net Position
Governmental Activities
2018 2017
Current assets $ 792,714 $ 616,609
Capital assets 13,103,043 13,354,489
Total Assets 13,895,757 13,971,098
Current liabilities 8,257 720
Net position- net investment in capital assets 13,103,043 13,354,489
Net position- unrestricted 784,457 615,889
Total Net Position $ 13,887,500 $ 13,970,378
The increase in current assets and net position — unrestricted is the result of revenues in excess
of expenditures at the fund level.
The decrease in capital assets and net position — net investment in capital assets is primarily
due to depreciation in the current year.
-5-
Agenda Page 114
Cedar Hammock Community Development District
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
For the Year Ended September 30, 2018
OVERVIEW OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
Financial Analysis of the District(Continued)
The following schedule provides a summary of the changes in net position of the District and is
presented by category for comparison purposes.
Change in Net Position
Governmental Activities
2018 2017
Governmental Revenues
Charges for services $ 365,350 $ 269,367
Investment earnings 9,416 5,263
Total Revenues 374,766 274,630
Expenses
General government 83,497 84,888
Physical environment 374,147 370,562
Total Expenses 457,644 455,450
Change in Net Position (82,878) (180,820)
Net Position- Beginning of Year 13,970,378 14,151,198
Net Position - End of Year $ 13,887,500 $ 13,970,378
The increase in charges for services is the result of a budgeted increase in special
assessments.
-6-
Agenda Page 115
Cedar Hammock Community Development District
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
For the Year Ended September 30, 2018
OVERVIEW OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
Capital Assets Activity
The following schedule provides a summary of the District's capital assets as of September 30,
2018 and 2017.
Governmental Activities
Description 2018 2017
Land and improvements $ 10,991,512 $ 10,991,512
Buildings and improvements 359,117 359,117
Infrastructure 5,747,726 5,747,726
Equipment 35,472 35,472
Accumulated depreciation (4,030,784) (3,779,338)
Total Capital Assets (Net) $ 13,103,043 $ 13,354,489
During the year, depreciation was$251;446.
General Fund Budgetary Highlights
The budget exceeded actual government expenditures primarily due to less bulkhead capital
outlay expenditures than were anticipated.
The were no amendments to the budget during the year ended September 30, 2018.
Economic Factors and Next Year's Budget
Cedar Hammock Community Development District does not expect any economic factors to
have any significant effect on the financial position or results of operations of the District in fiscal
year 2019.
Request for Information
The financial report is designed to provide a general overview of Cedar Hammock Community
Development District's finances for all those with an interest. Questions concerning any of the
information provided in this report or requests for additional information should be addressed to
the Cedar Hammock Community Development District, lnframark Infrastructure Management
Services, Inc., 210 N. University Drive, Suite 702, Coral Springs, Florida 33071.
- 7-
Agenda Page 116
Cedar Hammock Community Development District
STATEMENT OF NET POSITION
September 30, 2018
Governmental
Activities
ASSETS
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 468,812
Investments 308,304
Accounts receivable 5,913
Due from other governments 8,326
Deposits 1,359
Total Current Assets 792,714
Non-Current Assets:
Capital Assets Not Being Depreciated
Land and improvements 10,991,512
Capital Assets Being Depreciated
Buildings and improvements 359,117
Infrastructure 5,747,726
Equipment 35,472
Less: accumulated depreciation (4,030,784)
Total Non-Current Assets 13,103,043
Total Assets 13,895,757
LIABILITIES
Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses 8,257
NET POSITION
Net investment in capital assets 13,103,043
Unrestricted 784,457
Total Net Position $ 13,887,500
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
-8-
Agenda Page 117
Cedar Hammock Community Development District
STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES
For the Year Ended September 30, 207E
Net(Expense)
Revenue and
Program Changes in
Revenues Net Position
Charges for Governmental
Functions/Programs Expenses Services Activities
Primary government
Governmental Activities
General government $ (83,497) $ 114,348 $ 30,851
Physical environment (374,147) 251,002 (123,145)
Total Governmental Activities $ (457,644) $ 365,350 (92,294)
General revenues:
Interest earnings 9,416
Change in net position (82,878)
Net Position - October 1, 2017 13,970,378
Net Position - September 30, 2018 $ 13,887,500
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
- 9-
Agenda Page 118
Cedar Hammock Community Development District
BALANCE SHEET -
GENERAL FUND
September 30, 2018
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents $ 468,812
Investments 308,304
Accounts receivable 5,913
Due from other governments 8,326
Deposits 1,359
Total Assets $ 792,714
LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCES
Liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued expenses $ 8,257
Fund balances
Nonspendable:
Deposits 1,359
Assigned:
Roadways 157,725
Bulkheads 135,928
Lakes 32,153
Bridges 120,190
Operating reserves 43,617
Unassigned 293,485
Total Fund Balances 784,457
Total Liabilities and Fund Balances $ 792,714
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
- 10-
Agenda Page 119
Cedar Hammock Community Development District
RECONCILIATION OF TOTAL GOVERNMENTAL FUND BALANCES
TO NET POSITION OF GOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES
September 30, 2018
Total governmental fund balances $ 784,457
Amounts reported for governmental activities in the Statement of Net Position
are different because:
Capital assets not being depreciated, land and improvements,
used in governmental activities are not financial resources
and therefore, are not reported at the fund statement level. 10,991,512
Capital assets being depreciated; building and improvements,
$359,117, infrastructure, $5,747,726, and equipment, $35,472,
net of accumulated depreciation, $(4,030,784), used in
governmental activities are not financial resources and therefore,
are not reported at the fund statement level. 2,111,531
Net Position of Governmental Activities $ 13,887,500
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
- 11 -
Agenda Page 120
Cedar Hammock Community Development District
STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES
AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES
GENERAL FUND
For the Year Ended September 30, 2018
Revenues
Special assessments $ 365,350
Interest earnings 9,416
Total Revenues 374,766
Expenditures
Current
General government 83,497
Physical environment 122,701
Total Expenditures 206,198
Excess of revenues over/(under) expenditures 168,568
Fund Balances-October 1, 2017 615,889
Fund Balances -September 30, 2018 $ 784,457
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
- 12 -
Agenda Page 121
Cedar Hammock Community Development District
RECONCILIATION OF THE STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES
AND CHANGE IN FUND BALANCES OF GOVERNMENTAL
FUNDS TO THE STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES
For the Year Ended September 30, 2018
Net change in fund balances- total governmental funds $ 168,568
Amounts reported for governmental activities in the Statement of Activities are
different because:
Governmental funds report capital outlays as expenditures. However,
in the Statement of Activities, the cost of those assets is allocated
over their estimated useful lives as depreciation expense. This is the
amount of depreciation in the current year. (251,446)
Change in Net Position of Governmental Activities $ (82,878)
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
- 13-
Agenda Page 122
Cedar Hammock Community Development District
STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND
CHANGE IN FUND BALANCES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL
GENERAL FUND
For the Year Ended September 30, 2018
Variance with
Final Budget
Original Final Positive
Budget Budget Actual (Negative)
Revenues
Special assessments $ 364,342 $ 364,342 $ 365,350 $ 1,008
Interest earnings 2,017 2,017 9,416 7,399
Total Revenues 366,359 366,359 374,766 8,407
Expenditures
Current
General government 104,227 104,227 83,497 20,730
Physical environment 228,787 228,787 122,701 106,086
Capital outlay 1,509,945 1,509,945 - 1,509,945
Debt Service
Interest 23,400 23,400 - 23,400
Total Expenditures 1,866,359 1,866,359 206,198 1,660,161
Excess/(deficiency) of revenues
over/(under) expenditures (1,500,000) (1,500,000) 168,568 1,668,568
Other financing sources/(uses)
Loan proceeds 1,500,000 1,500,000 - (1,500,000)
Net change in fund balances - - 168,568 168,568
Fund Balances- October 1, 2017 608,266 608,266 615,889 7,623
Fund Balances - September 30, 2018 $ 608,266 $ 608,266 $ 784,457 $ 176,191
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
- 14 -
Agenda Page 123
Cedar Hammock Community Development District
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2018
NOTE A—SUMMARY OF ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The financial statements of Cedar Hammock Community Development District (the "District")
have been prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) as
applied to governmental units. The Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) is the
accepted standard-setting body for establishing governmental accounting and financial reporting
principles. The District's more significant accounting policies are described below.
1. Reporting Entity
The District was established on November 23, 1999, pursuant to the Uniform Community
Development District Act of 1980, Chapter 190, Florida Statutes, as amended (the "Act"), by
ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, as a Community
Development District. The District was established for the purposes of financing and
managing the acquisition, construction, maintenance and operation of the infrastructure
necessary for community development within its jurisdiction. The District is authorized to
issue bonds for the purpose, among others, of financing, funding, planning, establishing,
acquiring, constructing or re-constructing, enlarging or extending, equipping, operating and
maintaining water management, water supply, sewer and waste water management, bridges
or culverts, district roads, landscaping, street lights and other basic infrastructure projects
within or outside the boundaries of the District. The District is governed by a five-member
Board of Supervisors who are elected for four-year terms. The District operates within the
criteria established by Chapter 190.
As required by GAAP, these financial statements present the District (the primary
government) as a stand-alone government. The reporting entity for the District includes all
functions of government in which the District's Board exercises oversight responsibility.
Oversight responsibility includes, but is not limited to, financial interdependency, selection of
governing authority, designation of management, significant ability to influence operations
and accountability for fiscal matters.
Based upon the application of the above-mentioned criteria as set forth by the
Governmental Accounting Standards Board the District has identified no component units.
2. Measurement Focus and Basis of Accounting
The basic financial statements of the District are composed of the following:
• Government-wide financial statements
• Fund financial statements
• Notes to financial statements
- 15-
Agenda Page 124
Cedar Hammock Community Development District
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2018
NOTE A—SUMMARY OF ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
2. Measurement Focus and Basis of Accounting (Continued)
a. Government-wide Financial Statements
Government-wide financial statements report all non-fiduciary information about the
reporting government as a whole. These statements include the governmental activities
of the primary government. The effect of interfund activity has been removed from these
statements.
Governmental activities are normally supported by special assessments and interest.
Amounts paid to acquire capital assets are capitalized as assets, rather than reported as
an expenditure. Proceeds of long-term debt are recorded as liabilities in the
government-wide financial statements, rather than as an other financial source.
Amounts paid to reduce long-term indebtedness of the reporting government are
reported as a reduction of the related liability, rather than as an expenditure,
b. Fund Financial Statements
The underlying accounting system of the District is organized and operated on the basis
of separate funds, each of which is considered to be a separate accounting entity. The
operations of each fund are accounted for with a separate set of self-balancing accounts
that comprise its assets, liabilities, fund equity, revenues and expenditures or expenses,
as appropriate. Governmental resources are allocated to and accounted for in individual
funds based upon the purposes for which they are to be spent and the means by which
spending activities are controlled.
Fund financial statements for the primary government's governmental funds are
presented after the government-wide financial statements. These statements display
information about major funds individually.
- 16-
Agenda Page 125
Cedar Hammock Community Development District
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2018
NOTE A—SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
2. Measurement Focus and Basis of Accounting (Continued)
b. Fund Financial Statements (Continued)
Governmental Funds
The District classifies fund balance according to Governmental Accounting Standards
Board Statement 54 — Fund Balance Reporting and Governmental Fund Type
Definitions. The Statement requires the fund balance for governmental funds to be
reported in classifications that comprise a hierarchy based primarily on the extent to
which the government is bound to honor constraints on the specific purposes for which
amounts in those funds can be spent. The classifications include non-spendable,
restricted, committed, assigned and unassigned.
The District has a policy governing the fund balance classifications.
Nonspendable Fund Balance — This classification consists of amounts that cannot be
spent because they are either not in spendable form or are legally or contractually
required to be maintained intact.
Restricted Fund Balance — This classification includes amounts that can be spent only
for specific purposes stipulated by constitution, external resource providers, or through
enabling legislation.
Assigned Fund Balance —This classification consists of the Board of Supervisors' intent
to be used for specific purposes, but are neither restricted nor committed.
Unassigned Fund Balance — This classification is the residual classification for the
government's general fund and includes all spendable amounts not contained in the
other classifications. Unassigned fund balance is considered to be utilized first when an
expenditure is incurred for purposes for which amounts in any of those unrestricted fund
balance classifications could be used.
Fund Balance Spending Hierarchy — For all governmental funds except special revenue
funds, when restricted, committed, assigned, and unassigned fund balances are
combined in a fund, qualified expenditures are paid first from restricted or committed
fund balance, as appropriate, then assigned and finally unassigned fund balances.
- 17 -
Agenda Page 126
Cedar Hammock Community Development District
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2018
NOTE A—SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
2. Measurement Focus and Basis of Accounting (Continued)
b. Fund Financial Statements (Continued)
Governmental Funds (Continued)
Expenditures generally are recorded when a liability is incurred, as under accrual
accounting. Interest associated with the current fiscal period is considered to be an
accrual item and so has been recognized as revenue of the current fiscal period.
Revenues are considered to be available when they are collected within the current
period or soon thereafter to pay liabilities of the current period.
Under the current financial resources measurement focus, only current assets and
current liabilities are generally included on the balance sheet. The reported fund
balance is considered to be a measure of "available spendable resources".
Governmental fund operating statements present increases (revenues and other
financial sources) and decreases (expenditures and other financing uses) in net current
assets. Accordingly, they are said to present a summary of sources and uses of
"available spendable resources"during a period.
Because of their spending measurement focus, expenditure recognition for
governmental fund types excludes amounts represented by non-current liabilities. Since
they do not affect net current assets, such long-term amounts are not recognized as
governmental fund type expenditures or fund liabilities.
Amounts expended to acquire capital assets are recorded as expenditures in the year
that resources were expended, rather than as fund assets. The proceeds of long-term
debt are recorded as an other financing source rather than as a fund liability.
3. Basis of Presentation
a. Governmental Major Funds
General Fund — The General Fund is the District's primary operating fund. It accounts
for all financial resources of the general government.
- 18-
Agenda Page 127
Cedar Hammock Community Development District
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2018
NOTE A—SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
3. Basis of Presentation (Continued)
b. Non-current Governmental Assets/Liabilities
GASB Statement 34 requires that non-current governmental assets, such as land and
buildings, and non-current governmental liabilities, such as bonds payable, be reported
in the governmental activities column in the government-wide statement of net position.
4. Assets, Liabilities, and Net Position or Equity
a. Cash and Investments
Florida Statutes require state and local governmental units to deposit monies with
financial institutions classified as "Qualified Public Depositories," a multiple financial
institution pool whereby groups of securities pledged by the various financial institutions
provide common collateral from their deposits of public funds. This pool is provided as
additional insurance to the federal depository insurance and allows for additional
assessments against the member institutions, providing full insurance for public
deposits.
The District is authorized to invest in those financial instruments as established by
Section 218.415, Florida Statutes. The authorized investments consist of:
1. Direct obligations of the United States Treasury;
2. The Local Government Surplus Funds Trust or any intergovernmental investment
pool authorized pursuant to the Florida Interlocal Cooperative Act of 1969;
3. Interest-bearing time deposits or savings accounts in authorized qualified public
depositories;
4. Securities and Exchange Commission, registered money market funds with the
highest credit quality rating from a nationally recognized rating agency.
b. Restricted Assets
Certain assets of the District and a corresponding liability or portion of net position is
classified as restricted on the statement of net position because their use is limited either
by law through constitutional provisions or enabling legislation; or by restrictions
imposed externally by creditors. In a fund with both restricted and unrestricted assets,
qualified expenses are considered to be paid first from restricted net position and then
from unrestricted net position.
- 19-
Agenda Page 128
Cedar Hammock Community Development District
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2018
NOTE A—SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
4. Assets, Liabilities, and Net Position or Equity (Continued)
c. Capital Assets
Capital assets, which include property, plant and equipment, are reported in the
applicable governmental or business-type activities column.
The District defines capital assets as assets with an initial, individual cost of $5,000 or
more and an estimated useful life in excess of one year. The valuation basis for all
assets is historical cost.
The costs of normal maintenance and repairs that do not add to the value of the asset or
materially extend its useful life are not capitalized.
Major outlays for capital assets and improvements are capitalized as projects are
constructed.
Depreciation of capital assets is computed and recorded by utilizing the straight-line
method. Estimated useful lives of the various classes of depreciable capital assets are
as follows:
Buildings 7-39 years
Improvements other than buildings 20-40 years
Machinery and equipment 5-10 years
d. Budgets
Budgets are prepared and adopted after public hearings for the governmental funds,
pursuant to Chapter 190, Florida Statutes. The District utilizes the same basis of
accounting for budgets as it does for revenues and expenditures in its various funds.
The legal level of budgetary control is at the fund level. All budgeted appropriations
lapse at year end. Formal budgets are adopted for the general and debt service funds.
As a result, deficits in the budget columns of the accompanying financial statements may
occur.
- 20-
Agenda Page 129
Cedar Hammock Community Development District
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2018
NOTE B — RECONCILIATION OF GOVERNMENT-WIDE AND FUND FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
1. Explanation of Differences Between the Governmental Fund Balance Sheet and the
Government-wide Statement of Net Position
"Total fund balances" of the District's governmental funds, $784,457, differs from "net
position" of governmental activities, $13,887,500, reported in the Statement of Net Position.
This difference primarily results from the long-term economic focus of the Statement of Net
Position versus the current financial resources focus of the governmental fund balance
sheet. The effect of the differences is illustrated below.
Capital related items
When capital assets (land, buildings, infrastructure and equipment that are to be used in
governmental activities) are purchased or constructed, the cost of those assets is reported
as expenditures in governmental funds. However, the Statement of Net Position included
those capital assets among the assets of the District as a whole.
Land and improvements $ 10,991,512
Buildings and improvements 359,117
Infrastructure 5,747,726
Equipment 35,472
Accumulated depreciation (4,030,784)
Total $ 13.103,043
2. Explanation of Differences Between the Governmental Fund Operating Statements
and the Statement of Activities
The "net change in fund balances"for government funds, $168,568, differs from the "change
in net position" for governmental activities, $(82,878), reported in the Statement of Activities.
The differences arise primarily from the long-term economic focus of the Statement of
Activities versus the current financial resources focus of the governmental funds. The effect
of the differences is illustrated below.
Capital related items
Agenda Page 131
Cedar Hammock Community Development District
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2018
NOTE D—SPECIAL ASSESSMENT REVENUES
Special assessment revenues recognized for the 2017-2018 fiscal year were levied in October
2017. All taxes are due and payable on November 1 or as soon as the assessment roll is
certified and delivered to the Tax Collector. Per Section 197.162, Florida Statutes, discounts
are allowed for early payment at the rate of 4% in November, 3% in December, 2% in January,
and 1% in February. Taxes paid in March are without discount.
All unpaid taxes become delinquent as of April 1. Virtually all unpaid taxes are collected via the
sale of tax certificates on, or prior to, June 1; therefore, there were no material taxes receivable
at fiscal year end.
NOTE E—CAPITAL ASSETS
Capital asset activity for the year ended September 30, 2018 was as follows:
Balance Balance
October 1, September 30,
2017 Additions Deletions 2018
Governmental Activities:
Capital assets, not being depreciated:
Land and improvements $ 10,991,512 $ - $ - $ 10,991,512
Total Capital Assets, Not Depreciated 10,991,512 - - 10,991,512
Capital assets, being depreciated:
Building and improvements 359,117 - - 359,117
Infrastructure 5,747,726 - - 5,747,726
Equipment 35,472 - - 35,472
Total Capital Assets, Being Depreciated 6,142,315 - - 6,142,315
Less accumulated depreciation for:
Building and improvements (198,275) (17,956) - •(216,231)
Infrastructure (3,549,275) (231,121) - (3,780,396)
Equipment (31,788) (2,369) - (34,157)
Total Accumulated Depreciation (3,779,338) (251,446) - (4,030,784)
Total Capital Assets Depreciated, Net 2,362,977 (251,446) - 2,111,531
Governmental Activities Capital Assets $ 13,354,489 $ (251,446) $ - $ 13,103 043
Depreciation, ($251,446)was charged to physical environment.
NOTE F—RISK MANAGEMENT
The government is exposed to various risks of loss related to torts; theft of, damage to and
destruction of assets; errors and omissions; and natural disasters for which the government
carries commercial insurance.
-23-
Agenda Page 132
<
<C Berger, Toombs, Elam,
-e Gaines & Frank
Ccrtiticd Public Accountants PL
600 Citrus Avenue
Suite 200
Fort Pierce, Florida 34950
772/461-6120/!461-1155
FAX: 772/468-9278
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL
REPORTING AND ON COMPLIANCE AND OTHER MATTERS BASED ON AN AUDIT
OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS
To the Board of Supervisors
Cedar Hammock Community Development District
Collier County, Florida
We have audited, in accordance with the auditing standards generally accepted in the United
States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government
Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, the financial
statements of Cedar Hammock Community Development District, as of and for the year ended
September 30, 2018, and the related notes to the financial statements, and have issued our
report thereon dated April 26, 2019.
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
In planning and performing our audit, we considered Cedar Hammock Community Development
District's internal control over financial reporting to determine the audit procedures that are
appropriate in the circumstances for the purpose of expressing our opinions on the financial
statements, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of Cedar
Hammock Community Development District's internal control. Accordingly, we do not express
an opinion on the effectiveness of Cedar Hammock Community Development District's internal
control over financial reporting.
A deficiency in internal control exists when the design or operation of a control does not allow
management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to
prevent, or detect and correct misstatements on a timely basis. A material weakness is a
deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control, such that there is a reasonable
possibility that a material misstatement of the entity's financial statements will not be prevented,
or detected and corrected on a timely basis. A significant deficiency is a deficiency, or a
combination of deficiencies, in internal control that is less severe than a material weakness, yet
important enough to merit attention by those charged with governance.
Our consideration of internal control over financial reporting was for the limited purpose
described in the first paragraph of this section and was not designed to identify all deficiencies
in internal control that might be material weaknesses or significant deficiencies. Given these
limitations, during our audit we did not identify any deficiencies in internal control that we
consider to be material weaknesses. However, material weaknesses may exist that have not
been identified.
Fort Pierce/Stuart
- 24-
Member AICPA Member AICPA Division For CPA Firms Member FICPA
Private Companies Practice Section
Agenda Page 133
Berger, Toombs, Elam,
Gaines&Frank
CurViedP i,AltaoManu Pl
To the Board of Supervisors
Cedar Hammock Community Development District
Collier County, Florida
Compliance and Other Matters
As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether Cedar Hammock Community
Development District's financial statements are free of material misstatement, we performed
tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grant
agreements, noncompliance with which could have a direct and material effect on the
determination of financial statement amounts. However, providing an opinion on compliance
with those provisions was not an objective of our audit, and accordingly, we do not express such
an opinion. The results of our tests disclosed no instances of noncompliance or other matters
that are required to be reported under Government Auditing Standards.
Purpose of this Report
The purpose of this report is solely to describe the scope of our testing of internal control and
compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on the effectiveness of
the entity's internal control or on compliance. This report is an integral part of an audit
performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards in considering the entity's
internal control and compliance. Accordingly, this communication is not suitable for any other
purpose.
3'140. doorke loniu
0)Atixto) A,44,1
Berger, Toombs, Elam, Gaines& Frank
Certified Public Accountants
Fort Pierce, Florida
April 26, 2019
-25-
Agenda Page 134
ee,3 Berger, Toombs, Elam,
-rGaines & Frank
Certified Public Accountants PL
600 Citrus Avenue
Suite 200
Fort Pierce, Florida 34950
772/461-6120 1/461-1155
FAX: 772/468-9278
MANAGEMENT LETTER
To the Board of Supervisors
Cedar Hammock Community Development District
Collier County, Florida
Report on the Financial Statements
We have audited the financial statements of the Cedar Hammock Community Development
District as of and for the year ended September 30, 2018, and have issued our report thereon
dated April 26, 2019.
Auditor's Responsibility
We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United
States; the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing
Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States and Chapter 10.550, Rules
of the Florida Auditor General.
Other Reporting Requirements
We have issued our Independent Auditor's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
and on Compliance and Other Matters Based on an Audit of Financial Statements Performed in
Accordance with Government Auditing Standards and our Independent Auditor's Report on an
examination conducted in accordance with AICPA Professionals Standards, AT-C Section 315
regarding compliance requirements in accordance with Chapter 10.550, Rules of the Auditor
General. Disclosures in that report, which is dated April 26, 2019, should be considered in
conjunction with this management letter.
Prior Audit Findings
Section 10.554(1)(i)1., Rules of the Auditor General, requires that we determine whether or not
corrective actions have been made to address findings and recommendations made in the
preceding financial audit report. There were no findings or recommendations made in the
preceding financial audit report.
Financial Condition
Section 10.554(1)(i)5.a. and 10.556(7), Rules of the Auditor General, requires us to apply
appropriate procedures and communicate the results of our determination as to whether or not
Cedar Hammock Community Development District has met one or more of the conditions
described in Section 218.503(1), Florida Statutes, and to identify the specific conditions met. In
connection with our audit, we determined that the Cedar Hammock Community Development
District did not meet any of the conditions described in Section 218.503(1), Florida Statutes.
Fort Pierce/Stuart
Member AICPA Member AICPA D i ch For CPA Firms Member FICPA
Private Companies Practice Section
Agenda Page 135
<<�t Berger,Toombs, Elam,
`.--0/ Gaines&Frank
Cemfis PublIcAp.ountan. Pt
To the Board of Supervisors
Cedar Hammock Community Development District
Pursuant to Sections 10.554(1)(i)5.c. and 10.556(8), Rules of the Auditor General, we applied
financial conditions assessment procedures as of September 30, 2018 for the Cedar Hammock
Community Development District. It is management's responsibility to monitor the Cedar
Hammock Community Development District's financial condition; our financial condition
assessment was based in part on the representations made by management and the review of
the financial information provided by the same.
Section 10.554(1)(i)2., Rules of the Auditor General, requires that we communicate any
recommendations to improve financial management. In connection with our audit, we did not
have any such recommendations.
Additional Matters
Section 10.554(1)(i)3., Rules of the Auditor General, requires us to communicate
noncompliance with provisions of contracts or grant agreements, or abuse, that have occurred,
or are likely to have occurred, that have an effect on the financial statements that is less than
material but which warrants the attention of those charged with governance. In connection with
our audit, we did not note any such findings.
Purpose of this Letter
Our management letter is intended solely for the information and use of the Legislative Auditing
Committee, members of the Florida Senate and the Florida House of Representatives, the
Florida Auditor General, Federal and other granting agencies, the Board of Supervisors, and
applicable management, and is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than
these specified parties.
3044, dOON66101k,x�a d
Berger, Toombs, Elam, Gaines& Frank
Certified Public Accountants PL
Fort Pierce, Florida
April 26, 2019
-27-
Agenda Page 136
ecrBerger, Toombs, Elam
,
-re Gaines & Frank
Certified Public Accountants Pt_
600 Citrus Avenue
Suite 200
Fort Pierce, Florida 34950
772/461-6120//461-1155
FAX: 772/468-9278
INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANT'S REPORT/COMPLIANCE
WITH SECTION 218.415, FLORIDA STATUTES
To the Board of Supervisors
Cedar Hammock Community Development District
Collier County, Florida
We have examined Cedar Hammock Community Development District's compliance with
Section 218.415, Florida Statutes during the year ended September 30, 2018. Management is
responsible for Cedar Hammock Community Development District's compliance with those
requirements. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on Cedar Hammock Community
Development District's compliance based on our examination.
Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included examining, on a
test basis, evidence about Cedar Hammock Community Development District's compliance with
those requirements and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the
circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Our examination does not provide a legal determination on Cedar Hammock Community
Development District's compliance with the specified requirements.
In our opinion, Cedar Hammock Community Development District complied, in all material
respects, with the aforementioned requirements during the year ended September 30, 2018.
3040, ' to
abate '4- „it
Berger, Toombs, Elam, Gaines& Frank
Certified Public Accountants PL
Fort Pierce, Florida
April 26, 2019
Fort Pierce/Stuart
Member AICPA Member AICPA Di2ion For CPA Firms Member FICPA
Private Companies Practice Section
a
ever • Edwards Agenda Page 138
Supervisor o ElecUons
April 18,2019
Ms Sandra Demarco
Cedar Hammock CDD
210 N. Univeristy Drive Suite 702
Coral Springs, FL 33071
Dear Ms Demarco,
In compliance with 190.06 of the Florida Statutes this letter is to inform you that the official records of
the Collier County Supervisor of Election indicate 498 registered voters residing in the
Cedar Hammock CDD as of April 15, 2019.
Should you have any questions regarding election services for this district, please free to contact our
office,
Sincerely,
David B.Carpenter
Qualifying Officer
Collier County Supervisor of Elections
(239)252-8501
Dave.Carpenter@CollierCountyFl.gov
Rev Dr Martin Luther KingJr Building•3750 Enterprise Avenue•Naples FL 34104 �� ' rQ;
p P
Phone:(239)252-VOTE•Fax:(239)774-9468•www.CollierVotes.com6�ry o Coy~/