Agenda 10/27/2009 Item # 8AAgenda Item No. 8A
October 27, 2009
Page 1 of 75
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners adopt an
Ordinance amending Chapter 74 of the Collier County Code of Laws and
Ordinances (The Collier County Consolidated Impact Fee Ordinance) by
providing for the incorporation by reference of the impact fee study
entitled, "Collier County Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Update Study,"
dated June 26, 2009; amending Schedule Three of Appendix A to reflect the
revised rates set forth in the impact fee study and providing for an effective
date of November 1, 2009 for the Regional Parks Impact Fee rates and a
delayed effective date of February 1, 2010 for the Community Parks Impact
Fee rates in accordance with the notice period requirements of Section
163.31801(3)(d) Florida Statutes; the cumulative results of the rate changes
being an overall decrease in Parks Impact Fees.
OBJECTIVE: That the Board of County Commissioners (Board) adopt an Ordinance
amending Chapter 74 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances (Code) by
providing for the incorporation by reference of the impact fee study entitled, "Collier
County Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Update Study," dated June 26, 2009; amending;
Schedule Three of Appendix A to reflect the revised rates set forth in the impact fee study
and providing for an effective date of November 1, 2009 for the Regional Parks Impact:
Fee rates and a delayed effective date of February 1, 2010 for the Community Parks
Impact Fee rates in accordance with the notice period requirements of Section.
163.31801(3)(d) Florida Stattttes; the cumulative results of the rate changes being an
overall decrease in Parks Impact Fees.
CONSIDERATIONS: Impact fees are collected in order to provide a source of revenue
to fund the construction or improvement of public facilities necessitated by growth. As
such, Collier County has used impact fees as a funding source for growth- related capital
improvements related to Parks and Recreation since 1988.
Impact fees require development to contribute its fair share to the cost of improvements
and additions to infrastructure, but may not be charged in excess of the amount
anticipated to offset the demand on the respective facility.
On March 14, 2006, the Board adopted Ordinance No. 2006 -11, thereby completing a
three -year update to the Park Impact Fees. This update included the review and update of
the beach and boat access portion of the Park Impact Fees to ensure that it accurately
reflected the costs related to acquiring both types of facilities.
Based on Board direction, the "Collier County Impact Fee Indexing Study" and
associated rate schedules were adopted by the Board on June 26, 2007, via Ordinance No
2007 -57 with a delayed effective date of January 1, 2008. This ordinance established the
current Park Impact Fee rate schedules.
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 27, 2009
Page 2 of 75
The requirement for the update of impact fees "at least every three years" is set forth by
Section 74 -502 of the Code. Consistent with recommendations given by the Productivity
Committee and the Planning Commission during their review of the 2007 Annual Update
and Inventory Report (AUIR), the Board authorized that the three -year update of the
Parks Impact Fees be conducted one year earlier than scheduled. The Productivity
Committee participated in the development of the Scope of Services for the study and, in
accordance with the Board's direction, on January 15, 2008 the County directed its
impact fee consultant, Tindale- Oliver and Associates, Inc., to proceed with the update to
the Park Impact Fees. The Productivity Committee also participated in the "kick -off'
meeting in order to communicate specific questions to the consultant that were to be
addressed through the study process. The attached report describes the technical and
legal framework and methodology used to complete this update study which has been
reviewed and approved by the County's outside legal counsel, Nabors, Giblin and
Nickerson, P.A, for legal sufficiency.
The following is a brief summary of the major components of the update study:
• Inventory — The inventories of the regional and community parks were reviewed
and updated. This includes the addition of parks that have been developed or are
being developed since the 2006 study inventory was completed. The
classification of each of the parks was also reviewed in order to establish that they,
— were categorized. Facility inventories were reviewed and updated.
• Cost and credit components have been updated to reflect current figures.
• Land values were reviewed and updated. Land values for Community Parks
remained the same and decreased for Regional Parks.
• Demand component was revised to account for all housing units. The number of
housing units was revised for Community Parks to include only numbers for the
Unincorporated County and all housing units (County -wide) for the Regional
Parks calculations.
• Includes a comparison of Parks Impact Fees for surrounding counties and
counties of similar population throughout Collier County.
• Includes answers to a series of policy questions posed by the Productivity
Committee.
The fee schedule proposed in this update utilizes the same rate structure being utilized in
the current fee with rates specific to various types of residential land uses as well as rates
for hotels and motels. The proposed fee schedule is considered by the Consultant to be
the most accurate and legally defensible option for the imposition of these impact fees.
Below is a side -by -side comparison of the current and proposed impact fee rates, by land
use, for Community and Regional Parks:
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 27, 2009
Page 3 of 75
COMMUNITY PARKS:
LAND USE
CURRENT
PROPOSED
DOLLAR
PERCENT
Single- Family
RATE
RATE
CHANGE
-8%
Less than 1,500 sq. ft.
Per Dwelling
Per Dwelling
Per Dwelling
CHANGE
Single - Family
$1,075.25
$1,199.02
$123.77
12%
Less than 1,500 sq. ft.
Per Dwelling
Per Dwelling
Per Dwelling
-7%
(living area)
Unit
Unit
Unit
Single — Family
$1,181.05
$1,315.89
$134.84
11%
1,500 -2,499 sq. ft.
Per Dwelling
Per Dwelling
Per Dwelling
(living area)
Unit
Unit
Unit
Single- Family
$1,286.85
$1,445.75
$158.90
12%
2,500 sq. ft. or larger
Per Dwelling
Per Dwelling
Per Dwelling
(living area)
Unit
Unit
Unit
$862.50
$711.45
($151.05)
-18%
Multi- Family
Per Dwelling
Per Dwelling
Per Dwelling
Unit
Unit
Unit
Mobile Home/RV Park
$1,062.60
$945.71
($116.89)
-11%
Per pad
Per pad
Per pad
Hotel/Motel
$578.45
$503.22
($75.23)
-13%
Per room
Per room
Per room
REGIONAL PARKS:
LAND USE
CURRENT
RATE
PROPOSED
RATE
DOLLAR
CHANGE
PERCENT
INCREASE
Single- Family
$2,378.20
$2,199.69
($178.51)
-8%
Less than 1,500 sq. ft.
Per Dwelling
Per Dwelling
Per Dwelling
(living area)
Unit
Unit
Unit
Single — Family
$2,612.80
$2,420.51
($192.29)
-7%
1,500 -2,499 sq. ft.
Per Dwelling
Per Dwelling
Per Dwelling
(living area)
Unit
Unit
Unit
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 27, 2009
Page 4 of 75
Single- Family
$2,847.40
$2,666.80
($180.60)
-6%
2,500 sq. ft. or larger
Per Dwelling
Per Dwelling
Per Dwelling
PERCENT
(living area)
Unit
Unit
Unit
CHANGE
Single - Family
$1,907.85
$1,298.26
($609.59)
-32%
Multi - Family
Per Dwelling
Per Dwelling
Per Dwelling
(living area)
Unit
Unit
Unit
Mobile Home/RV Park
$2,351.75
$1,916.05
($435.70)
-19%
1,500 -2,499 sq. ft.
Per pad
Per pad
Per pad
Hotel/Motel
$1,279.95
$1,038.61
($241.34)
-19%
Single- Family
Per room
Per room
Per room
_1%
COMBINED:
CURRENT
PROPOSED
OVERALL
OVERALL
TOTAL
TOTAL
DOLLAR
PERCENT
LAND USE
CHANGE
CHANGE
Single - Family
$3,453.45
$3,398.71
($54.74)
-2%
Less than 1,500 sq. ft.
Per Dwelling
Per Dwelling
Per Dwelling
(living area)
Unit
Unit
Unit
Single — Family
$3,793.85
$3,736.40
($57.45)
-2%
1,500 -2,499 sq. ft.
Per Dwelling
Per Dwelling
Per Dwelling
(living area)
Unit
Unit
Unit
Single- Family
$4,134.25
$4,112.55
($21.70)
_1%
2,500 sq. ft. or larger
Per Dwelling
Per Dwelling
Per Dwelling
(living area)
Unit
Unit
Unit
$2,770.35
$2,009.71
($760.64)
-27%
Multi - Family
Per Dwelling
Per Dwelling
Per Dwelling
Unit
Unit
Unit
Mobile Home/RV Park
$3,414.35
$2,861.76
($552.59)
-16%
Per pad
Per pad
Per pad
Hotel/Motel
$1,858.40
$1,541.83
($316.57)
-17%
Per room
Per room
Per room
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 27, 2009
Page 5 of 75
The third chart above showing the "Combined" fees first illustrates the total Parks Impact
Fees, by type, currently assessed in unincorporated Collier County. The next column
provides the proposed Parks Impact Fees, as set forth in the impact fee study. The result,
as displayed in the last two columns, is a proposed overall reduction in each of the land
use categories. Therefore, although the Community Parks Impact Fees are increasing for
single - family homes, that increase is offset by the decrease in Regional Parks Impact
Fees. Properties in the three municipalities (Naples, Marco, Everglades) do not pay
Collier County Community Parks Impact Fees so new permits issued in the
municipalities, after November 1, 2009, will also receive the benefit of the rate reduction„
The largest overall decrease is in the "Multi- family" category. The basis for this
reduction is largely related to the updated demand component which accounts for an
increase in multi - family units from those included in the last update.
As discussed above, the Productivity Committee was involved with the development of
the scope of work for the update study. Upon the release of the draft update study the
Productivity Committee then began the review process in order to formulate a
recommendation to the Board. The proposed study was discussed in detail at the April
15, 2009 regular Productivity Committee meeting, the May 20, 2009 regular Productivity
Committee meeting and the August 19, 2009 regular Productivity Committee meeting, at
which time the Committee finalized their recommendation to the Board. That
correspondence has been provided as an attachment to this item (Exhibit A). In summary,
of that recommendation, the Productivity Committee proposes that the Board adopt the!
update study as prepared, but also apply a further percentage reduction to the rates. The
basis for this recommendation involves 75% of the beach and boat access land being
valued at market value and capping the value of 25% of the beach and boat access land at
the inland park acreage value of $230,000. The impact fee consultant provided several
alternatives to address the Productivity Committee's issues related to land cost, future
planned parks and acquisition of beach and boat access properties. The Productivity
Committee determined that the approach above best addresses their concerns by
acknowledging that the majority of planned parks will be built in Eastern Collier County
and $230,000 is the most accurate estimate of future land costs. This recommendation
provides a further reduction of 12% to the Community Parks Impact Fees and 18% to the
Regional Parks Impact Fees. This reduction is in addition to the changes recommended
by the proposed study. A detailed chart has been provided displaying a comparison
between the rates proposed by the update study and the Productivity Committee
recommendation (Exhibit B).
Because the update study proposes an overall decrease in Parks Impact Fee rates, a
corresponding decrease in revenue has also been calculated. Further, staff calculated the
revenue implications of the Productivity Committee's recommendation and discussed the
information, as well as debt obligations, at length with the Productivity Committee.
These revenue projections will be discussed in more detail in the "Fiscal Impact" section
of this Executive Summary.
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 27, 2009
Page 6 of 75
On September 16, 2009 and October 7, 2009, the proposed Park Impact Fee rate schedule
and the updated study were presented to the Development Services Advisory Committee
(DSAC). The final recommendation made by the DSAC, by a unanimous vote, is as
follows. The DSAC supports the recommendation by the Productivity Committee for
specified further reductions in the Community and Regional Parks Impact Fee rates. The
DSAC additionally suggested that the Board direct the impact fee consultant and /or staff
to conduct further review of the differential in land and facilities costs between
Community and Regional Parks, consider adjusting the value of high cost facilities such
as parking garages, water park facilities, etc. as those are unlikely to be replicated in the
future and are anomalies in the inventory, and that the Board consider reducing the Level
of Service for Community and Regional Parks in consideration of other recreational
facilities, such as state and federal parks, that can not be included as part of the Parks
inventory but provide recreational resource for the population and therefore make sense
to use as a basis to lower the level of service. If the Board elects to accept the
Productivity Committee's recommendation, supported by the DSAC, the DSAC
acknowledged that the additional recommendations would be considered during the next
required annual update of the Parks Impact Fees.
The proposed Parks and Recreation Impact Fee rate schedules and update study will also
be presented to the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board on October 21, 2009. Due to
the timing requirements for the submittal of this Executive Summary and the date of the
Parks and Recreation Advisory Board meeting relative to the date of the public hearing
for this item, the recommendations of the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board will be
presented for the record at the public hearing on October 27, 2009.
In accordance with the notice period requirements of Section 163.31801(3)(4) Florida
Statute (The Florida Impact Fee Act) upon adoption by the Board the proposed Parks
Impact Fees will be implemented on two dates. Based on changes to the statute passed in
the 2009 Legislative Session, decreases to or elimination of impact fees are not subject to
the 90 -day notice requirement. Therefore, the proposed Regional Parks Impact Fee rates,
which set forth a decrease in each land use category, will become effective on November
1, 2009. This date provides a few days to allow the Ordinance to be filed with the Florida.
Department of State and provide notice to the Municipalities that collect impact fees on
behalf of Collier County. The proposed Community Parks Impact Fee rates set forth
increases in some categories and decreases in others, and therefore are subject to the 90-
day notice requirements. The Community Parks Impact Fees will become effective on
February 1, 2010 in observance of that notice requirement.
FISCAL IMPACT: Based upon actual past collections of Park Impact Fees and current
permitting activity, the projected change in Park Impact Fee revenue, associated to the
study and corresponding fee schedule changes, is anticipated to be approximately a 5.6%
reduction to annual collections, which is a loss of roughly $103,890. These estimates
assume that the volume of building permits as well as the size and type of units being
constructed remains fairly constant and similar to that experienced over the last 1.2 month
period. Changes in these trends will directly affect this incoming impact fee revenue
stream.
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 27, 2009
Page 7 of 75
Parks Impact Fees are used in part to repay current debt for new facilities necessitated by
growth. The annual debt service payment related to Parks is approximately $3.12 million
per year. In Fiscal Year 2009 Parks Impact Fees generated nearly $1.8 million in revenue
based on the current impact fee rate structure. In Fiscal Year 2010 adequate funds,
through the use of current impact fees and parks fund reserves, are available to pay the
debt service payment without relying on loans from other funds. However, in Fiscal Year
2011 it is anticipated that the Parks Impact Fee revenue will be further reduced, as
detailed above, and adequate parks fund reserves no longer exist, therefore the Parks
Impact Fee fund will likely need to receive a loan from another fund in order to meet its
debt commitments; if required, this loan would likely be made from the 1/3 mil capital
allocation from the General Fund.
The Productivity Committee recommendation has a corresponding reduction in revenue
that is much greater than that associated to the proposed study, as it provides for further
overall reduction in rates in addition to the decreases set forth in the update study. The
revenue loss based on that recommendation compared to current revenue and permitting;
activity, is $380,907. This amount is an additional loss of $277,017 above the estimated
revenue loss related to the proposed study and corresponding rate schedule changes.
As discussed above, for the Fiscal Year 2011 budget, it is anticipated that an internal loan
will be required in order to offset the shortfall of Parks Impact Fees needed to make the
annual debt service payment. By providing for a further reduction in Parks Impact Fees,
above that recommended in the proposed study, the amount of the required loan is
increased.
Upon adoption of this Ordinance, the County will continue with the three -year Park:
Impact Fee update cycle pursuant to 74- 502(a) of the Code. The Parks Impact Fees will,
also be indexed in the two years between formal update studies in accordance with the-
County's adopted indexing methodology. Based on the change in indexing methodology
from the use of the 10 -year regression analysis model to the 2 -year average model, the
indexing calculation are significantly more sensitive to current economic trends.
Therefore, it is reasonable to assume that when the Parks Impact Fees are indexed in
2010 there will be a noticeable adjustment based on two years of declining land values.
In the event that the Board elects to implement the Productivity Committee's
recommendation for an additional rate reduction, staff recommends that the reduction be
factored in when establishing the index for the Parks Impact Fees in FY 2010 in order to
understand the funding implications that may be caused by first implementing a large rate
reduction based on policy and a second possible reduction based on the indexing
calculation.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: The adoption of the proposed Park Impact
Fee update is consistent with Objective 1.2 of the Capital Improvement Element (CIE) of
the Collier County Growth Management Plan (GMP), which states: "Future development
will bear a proportionate cost offacility improvements necessitated by growth."
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 27, 2009
Page 8 of 75
The proposed impact fee rates are designed to provide adequate funding for the
acquisition of land and the construction of Park facilities and capital improvements
necessitated by growth, however impact fees may not be collected in excess of the
amount reasonably anticipated to fund such improvements. The proposed impact fee rates
represent accurate assessment of the cost of providing capital park facilities attributable
to new development.
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: The proposed Ordinance was reviewed by both
outside counsel and the County Attorney and is legally sufficient for Board action. - JAK
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners adopt an Ordinance
amending Chapter 74 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances by providing;
for the incorporation by reference of the impact fee study entitled, "Collier County Parks
and Recreation Impact Fee Update Study," dated June 26, 2009; amending Schedule;
Three of Appendix A to reflect the revised rates set forth in the impact fee study and
providing for an effective date of November 1, 2009 for the Regional Parks Impact Fee:
rates and a delayed effective date of February 1, 2010 for the Community Parks Impact
Fee rates in accordance with the notice period requirements of Section 163.31801(3)(d)
Florida Statutes; the cumulative results of the rate changes being an overall decrease in
Parks Impact Fees.
Prepared by: Amy Patterson, Impact Fee and Economic Development Manager, CDES
Page 1 of 2
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 27, 2009
Page 9 of 75
file://C:\AgendaTest \Export\137-October 27,2009\08. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARIN... 10/21/2009
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Item Number.
8A
Item Summary:
Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners adopt an Ordinance amending
Chapter 74 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances (The Collier County
Consolidated Impact Fee Ordinance) by providing for the incorporation by reference of the
impact fee study entitled, Collier County Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Update Study,
dated June 26, 2009; amending Schedule Three of Appendix A to reflect the revised rates
set forth in the impact fee study and providing for an effective date of November 1, 2009 for
the Regional Parks Impact Fee rates and a delayed effective date of February 1, 2010 for the
Community Parks Impact Fee rates in accordance with the notice period requirements of
Section 163.31801(3)(d) Florida Statutes; the cumulative results of the rate changes being an
overall decrease in Parks Impact Fees.
Meeting Date:
10/27/2009 9:00:00 AM
Prepared By
Amy Patterson
Impact Fee Manager Date
Community Development &
Environmental Services
Financial Admin. & Housing 10/12/2009 12:13:53 PM
Approved By
Judy Puig
Operations Analyst Date
Community Development &
Community Development &
Environmental Services
Environmental Services Admin. 10/1212009 3:23 PM
Approved By
Marla Ramsey
Public Services Administrator Date
Public Services
Public Services Admin. 1 011 3/2009 11:48 AM
Approved By
Community Development &
Joseph K. Schmitt
Environmental Services Adminstrator Date
Community Development &
Community Development &
Environmental Services
Environmental Services Admin. 10/13/2009 1:21 PM
Approved By
OMB Coordinator
OMB Coordinator Date
County Manager's Office
Office of Management & Budget 10/14/2009 9:59 AM
Approved By
Jeff Klatzkow
County Attorney Date
County Attorney
County Attorney Office 10/15/2009 9:39 AM
Approved By
Susan Usher
Senior Management /Budget Analyst Date
County Manager's Office
Office of Management & Budget 10/15/2009 5:40 PM
file://C:\AgendaTest \Export\137-October 27,2009\08. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARIN... 10/21/2009
Page 2 of 2
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 27, 2009
Page 10 of 75
Approved By
Mark Isackson Budget Analyst Date
County Manager's Office Office of Management & Budget 10/16/2009 10:22 AM
Approved By
Leo E. Ochs, Jr. Deputy County Manager Date
Board of County
Commissioners
County Manager's Office 1011712009 3:31 PM
file: / /C: \AgendaTest \Export\I37 - October 27,2009\08. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARIN... 10/21/2009
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 27, 2009
Page 11 of 75
ORDINANCE NO. 2009-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING CHAPTER 74 OF THE
COLLIER COUNTY CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES, THAT
ORDINANCE BEING THE COLLIER COUNTY CONSOLIDATED
IMPACT FEE ORDINANCE, AS AMENDED, PROVIDING FOR THE
INCORPORATION, BY REFERENCE, OF THE IMPACT FEE STUDY
ENTITLED "COLLIER COUNTY PARKS AND RECREATION IMPACT
FEE UPDATE STUDY "; AMENDING THE PARKS AND RECREATION
IMPACT FEE RATE SCHEDULE, WHICH IS SCHEDULE THREE OF
APPENDIX A, AS SET FORTH IN THE IMPACT FEE UPDATE STUDY;
PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR
INCLUSION IN THE CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES; AND
PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF NOVEMBER 1, 2009, FOR
THE REGIONAL PARKS IMPACT FEE RATE SCHEDULE AND
FEBRUARY 1, 2010, FOR THE COMMUNITY PARKS IMPACT FEE
RATE SCHEDULE.
WHEREAS, Collier County has used impact fees as a funding source for growth- related
capital improvements for parks and recreational facilities since 1988; and
WHEREAS, on March 13, 2001, the Board of County Commissioners (Board) adopted
Ordinance No. 2001 -13, the Collier County Consolidated Impact Fee Ordinance, repealing and
superseding all of the County's then existing impact fee regulations, and consolidating all of the
County's impact fee regulations into that one Ordinance, codified in Chapter 74 of the Collier
County Code of Laws and Ordinances (the "Code "); and
WHEREAS, on March 14, 2006, the Board of County Commissioners adopted
Ordinance No. 2006 -11, thereby amending Schedule Three of Appendix A of Chapter 74 of the
Code, and establishing the County's then current Parks and Recreation Impact Fee rates; and
WHEREAS, on June 26, 2007, the Board adopted Ordinance No. 2007 -57 incorporating
the "Collier County Impact Fee Indexing Study" through which the Parks and Recreation Impact
Fees were indexed in accordance with the prescribed methodology, thereby establishing the rates
that are currently in effect; and
WHEREAS, as Section 74 -502 of the Code states that impact fee studies should be
reviewed at least every three years, the County retained Tindale- Oliver and Associates,
Incorporated (the "Consultant "), to review the existing Parks and Recreation Impact Fees and
recommend changes to the fees where appropriate; and
Underlined text is added; Stfask through text is deleted
Page 1 of 4
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 27, 2009
Page 12 of 75
WHEREAS, the Consultant has prepared an impact fee study entitled "Collier County
Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Update Study," dated June 26, 2009 (the "Study "); and
WHEREAS, Collier County uses impact fees to supplement the funding of necessary
capital improvements required to provide public facilities to serve new population and related
development that is necessitated by growth in Collier County; and
WHEREAS, the Study recommends changes to the Parks and Recreation Impact Fee rate
schedule, as set forth in Schedule Three of Appendix "A" of Chapter 74 of the Collier County
Code of Laws and Ordinances; and
WHEREAS, the Study also recommends establishing the proposed impact fee rates in
order to equitably distribute the costs of acquiring and constructing public facilities based upon a
rational nexus relating costs incurred by fee payers to infrastructure impacts created by specified
land uses; and
WHEREAS, the Consultant has reviewed and updated the fee calculation methodologies
that will be imposed in an equitable and non - discriminatory manner; and
WHEREAS, Section 163.31801, Florida Statutes, which is the Florida Impact Fee Act,
requires the most recent and localized data be used in impact fee calculations and this study
complies with that requirement; and
WHEREAS, the study methodology has been reviewed and approved by Collier
County's outside legal counsel, Nabors, Giblin and Nickerson, P.A.; and
WHEREAS, staff has thoroughly reviewed the calculations and findings, concurs with
the recommended changes to the Parks and Recreation Impact Fee rate schedule, and
recommends that the Board of County Commissioners adopt this Ordinance to implement the
recommended changes.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that:
SECTION ONE. Article I, General, Section 74 -106, Adoption of impact fee studies, of the
Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances is hereby amended to read as follows:
Section 74 -106. Adoption of impact fee studies.
Underlined text is added; Strurk thfaugh text is deleted
Page 2 of 4
Agenda REem No, 8A
October 27, 2009
Page 13 of 75
(3) Parks and recreational facilities: "Park I paet Fee Update pfepa -ea !011ie
C=. 1,1jeholaS,T 10
, -2006), "Collier County Parks and Recreation Impact Fee
Update Study," prepared by Tindale- Oliver and Associates Inc (June 26 2009 ;
and
SECTION TWO. Schedule Three, Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Rate Schedule, of
Appendix A of Chapter 74 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances is hereby
amended as set forth in the attachment to this Ordinance.
SECTION THREE. CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY.
In the event this Ordinance conflicts with any other Ordinance of Collier County or other
applicable law, the more restrictive shall apply. If any phrase or portion of this Ordinance is held
invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a
separate, distinct, and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the
remaining portions.
SECTION FOUR. INCLUSION IN CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES.
The provisions of this Ordinance shall be made a part of the Code of Laws and
Ordinances of Collier County, Florida. The sections of the Ordinance may be renumbered or re-
lettered and internal cross - references amended throughout to accomplish such, and the word
"ordinance" may be changed to "section," "article," or any other appropriate word.
SECTION FIVE. EFFECTIVE DATE.
This Ordinance shall be considered adopted upon filing with the Florida Department of
State; however, the effective date of the Regional Park Impact Fee rate schedule shall be
November 1, 2009, and the effective date of the Community Parks Impact Fee rate schedule shall
be delayed to February 1, 2010.
Underlined text is added; StfwA- thfough text is deleted
Page 3 of 4
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 27, 2009
Page 14 of 75
PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier
County, Florida this
ATTEST
Dwight E. Brock, Clerk
M.
Approved .as to form
and llizal �fAciencv
day of '2009.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
ME
, Deputy Clerk DONNA FIALA, CHAIRMAN
Underlined text is added; StFusk thre+.egh text is deleted
Page 4 of 4
Agenda Item No. 8A
October, 27, 2009
Page 15 of 75
APPENDIX A - SCHEDULE THREE
PARKS AND RECREATIONAL FAC-HIT4I�,S IMPACT FEE RATE SCHEDULE
:e 'onal Parks - Effective• November 1 2009
_Impact Fee and Use Category
Rate
Pa+lks- -Regis s
Hotel/Motel
11 ,038.61 Per Room
Mobile Home/RV Park
$1,916.05 Per Unit/Site
Multi - Family = nv
$1,298.26 Per Dwelling Unit
Single Family Detached House
Less than 1,500 sq. ft. W2fl7 IL L99-69 Per Dwelling Unit
1,500 to 2,499 sq. ft. $2 420.51
' Per Dwelling Unit
2,500 sq. ft. or larger ;84� qg 2 666.80 Per Dwelling Unit
Note: Community Parks Impact Fees do not apply to the City of Naples,
City of Marco Island or Everglades City.
Underlined text is added; &4uelc4hFeegh text is deleted
Community Parks - Effective: February 1 2010
Impact Fee Land Use Category
— { �
Rate
Hotel /Motel
Mobile Home /RV Park
503.22
Per Room
Multi- Family
945.71
Per Unit/Site
Single Family Detached House "62-40
711.45
Per Dwelling Unit
Less than 1,500 sq. ft.5
1,500 to 2,499 sq. ft. W'
11,199.02
Per Dwelling Unit
> I
2,500 sq. ft. or larger
11,315.89
Per Dwelling Unit
$1.445.75
Per Dwelling Unit
:e 'onal Parks - Effective• November 1 2009
_Impact Fee and Use Category
Rate
Pa+lks- -Regis s
Hotel/Motel
11 ,038.61 Per Room
Mobile Home/RV Park
$1,916.05 Per Unit/Site
Multi - Family = nv
$1,298.26 Per Dwelling Unit
Single Family Detached House
Less than 1,500 sq. ft. W2fl7 IL L99-69 Per Dwelling Unit
1,500 to 2,499 sq. ft. $2 420.51
' Per Dwelling Unit
2,500 sq. ft. or larger ;84� qg 2 666.80 Per Dwelling Unit
Note: Community Parks Impact Fees do not apply to the City of Naples,
City of Marco Island or Everglades City.
Underlined text is added; &4uelc4hFeegh text is deleted
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 27, 2009
Page 16 of 75
COLLIER COUNTY
PARKS AND RECREATION
IMPACT FEE UPDATE STUDY
FINAL REPORT
Collier County
June 26, 2009
Prepared, for:
Collier County
3301 E. Tarniami Trail
Naples, Florida 34112
Ph (239) 252 -8999
Prepared by:
Tindale - Oliver & Associates, Inc.
1000 N. Ashley Dr., #100
Tampa, Florida, 33602
ph (813) 224 -8862, fax (813) 226-2106
073036 -02.0
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 27, 2009
Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc. Page 17 of 75
Planning rind En�,gnccring
June 26, 2009
Ms. Amy Patterson
Impact Fee Manager
Collier County Financial Administration and Housing Department
2800 North Horseshoe Drive
Naples, Florida 34104
RE: Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Update Study
Dear Ms. Patterson:
Enclosed is the Final Technical Report for the Collier County Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Update
Study. If you should have any questions concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact me or
Nilgun Kamp.
It has been our pleasure to have worked with County staff on this important project.
Sincerely,
Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc.
Steven A. Tindale, P.E., AICP
President
1000 North Ashley Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, Florida 33602 • Phone: (813) 224 -8862 & Fax: (813) 226 -2106
1595 South Semoran Boulevard, Building 7, Suite 1540, Winter Park, Florida 32792 * Phone: (407) 657 -9210 • Fax: (407) 657 -9106
195 South Central Avenue, Bartow, Florida 33830 • Phone: (863) 533 -8454 • Fax: (863) 533 -8481
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 27, 2009
Page 18 of 75
COLLIER COUNTY
PARKS AND RECREATION IMPACT FEE UPDATE STUDY
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction................................................................................. ............................... 1
Inventory..................................................................................... ...............................
2
Population.................................................................................... ............................... 7
Levelof Service ........................................................................... ...............................
7
CostComponent ......................................................................... ...............................
10
Facility and Equipment Cost ................................................ ...............................
10
LandCost ............................................................................. ...............................
13
Total Impact Cost per Resident ........................................... ...............................
14
CreditComponent ...................................................................... ...............................
15
Capital Expansion Expenditures Credit ............................... ...............................
15
DebtService Credit .............................................................. ...............................
17
Net Parks and Recreation Impact Cost ...................................... ...............................
19
Calculated Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Schedule ............. ...............................
22
Impact Fee Schedule Comparison ............................................. ...............................
23
PolicyIssues .............................................................................. ...............................
25
Appendices
Appendix A — Land Valuation Analysis — Supplemental Information
Appendix B — Population Analysis — Supplemental Information
Appendix C — Distribution of Parks and Recreation Inventory Value for Indexing
Calculations
Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc. Collier County
June 2009 i Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Study
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 27, 2009
Page 19 of 75
COLLIER COUNTY
PARKS AND RECREATION IMPACT FEE UPDATE STUDY
Introduction
Collier County has been experiencing steady growth over the last several years, with an
average annual population increase of 3.7 percent from 2000 to 2008. The County also is
expected to experience a continuing increase in its population from 2008 to 2025
(approximately 2.2 percent per year). To address the infrastructure costs associated with
new growth, the County retained Tindale- Oliver & Associates (TOA) to update the
County's parks and recreation impact fee schedule. This report contains the data analysis
and assumptions used to update the parks and recreation impact fee program.
An impact fee is a one -time capital charge levied against new development and is
designed to cover the cost of the capital infrastructure consumed by new development.
The net impact fee is calculated as the total capital cost of providing the necessary
infrastructure or services, less any additional revenue generated by new development that
also will be used to pay for the additional infrastructure or services necessitated by new
growth. This study utilizes a standards -driven impact fee methodology, in which new
development is charged based on the value of the current infrastructure that they will
consume, less any applicable impact fee credits. Under the standards -driven approach,
new development is not charged for capital expansion to the system for reasons other
than those necessitated by new growth.
The principal purpose of an impact fee is to maintain the current level of service standard
established by the County, as well as to assist in funding the implementation of projects
that have been or will be identified in Collier County's Annual Update of Inventory
Report (AUIR) for parks and recreation facilities.
The impact fees recommended in this technical study must pass a dual rational -nexus test
by demonstrating that the need for capital facilities created by new development is
proportionate to the amount of the fee charged, and the expenditure of impact fee funds
creates a reasonable benefit to the new development paying the fees.
The purpose of this study is to create a legally defensible and technically supportable set
of impact fees for parks and recreation impact fee program. It is important to note that,
whenever possible, the most current and local data available at the time the study was
utilized, pursuant to State legislature.
Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc. Collier County
June 2009 1 Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Study
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 27, 2009
Page 20 of 75
This report identifies the methodology upon which the updated parks and recreation
impact fee schedule will be based, including the service area, level of service, demand,
cost, and credit components. The remainder of this report is organized in the following
sections:
• Inventory
• Population
• Level of Service
• Cost Component
• Credit Component
• Net Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Cost
• Calculated Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Schedule
• Parks and Recreation Fee Schedule Options
• Impact Fee Schedule Comparison
• Policy Issues
These various elements are summarized in the remainder of this report, with the result
being the calculated parks and recreation impact fee schedule.
Inventory
Collier County parks and recreation facilities are classified into three different types of
parks: neighborhood, community and regional parks, based on the information provided
in the County's AUIR. It should be noted that the AUIR classifies Big Corkscrew Island
Regional Park (Orange Tree) and Vanderbilt Extension Community Park as community
parks; however, these two parks are classified as regional parks in the impact fee
inventory due to the size (acreage) of the park and because these parks draw visitors from
the entire county. Because neighborhood parks tend to target residents within a limited
geographic area, they are not included in the County's impact fee. In addition, the impact
fee inventory does not contain any parks or portions thereof that are located in wetlands
and are unable to be developed.
Table 1 provides an inventory of all parks and recreation facilities that are owned by
Collier County and included in the impact fee analysis, along with the facilities that are
available at each park location, based on infonnation provided in the County's AUIR
(with the exception of Big Corkscrew Island Regional Park and Vanderbilt Extension
Community Park, as previously discussed). The parks and recreation inventory used as
Tindale - Oliver & Associates, Inc. Collier County
June 2009 2 Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Study
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 27, 2009
Page 21 of 75
the basis for the impact fee analysis includes 40 parks, including 21 regional parks and 19
community parks located in eight regions throughout Collier County.
Parks facilities included in the inventory that are not required in the AUIR were obtained
from the County insurance reports, and information from County staff on facilities
constructed since the last impact fee update was completed in 2006. Of the County
owned parks, Naples Zoo is not included in the inventory used for impact fee
calculations. Although the County owns the land, the Zoo leases the land from the
County and charges a fee to the public to enter the Zoo. As such, this park is not open to
the public without an entrance fee and generates revenue from the lease.
Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc. Collier County
June 2009 3 Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Study
CO oLO
�
o-
pN O
ZEN
N N
m
O
Q
0
N
?
l6
LL
0
CD
m
Y
m
10
a
c
0
U
`m
O
U
I T
O In
v �
ai Ii
O u
v
D
a
Q
�o
< M Lo
00 CD r—
L
— Q)
(3) OS
m 00-
-0—
c 0
(D
0
a 19
LL
c
c 0
c w
0
co
U)
Fes'
0.
0
0
0
o in
cX
�o
�o
HIM
11
Ell
IM-1
mi
11111111
11
11
Ell
11
111111111
111
111111
Ell
11111111111
11
1
I
INS
11
1
11
1
11
1
111
11111
1111111111
m
11111111111
1
eye
1101
o in
cX
�o
�o
QMLO
CO CD I—
CD
p CV O
z' v
ENN
@ on
- U
NO
Q
0
C
C
y
m
V
B
N LL
C O
C m
vv
� m
m �
a
f9 M
T
C
7
O
U
U
c
o t
v, o
willillillillill IN 111 IN IIIIIE-111
c n
�v
x
v c
C _T
Cod
ti v
_ c
]
o
- o
c c
o m
x c
v
� 3
vG
x
a
0 0
1111111111111 IN IN I gill 1111ml
a� >
C � L
N V
V � �
� G
V n
S� Q
y T
^ C
G
c G s
L 3 b
v V N
3 c
T T
G 9
c v�
vw
o `y'
c
0
a
G
lim
IQ
� rn
Y o
v o
r
I M
I I
MEN
■
a� >
C � L
N V
V � �
� G
V n
S� Q
y T
^ C
G
c G s
L 3 b
v V N
3 c
T T
G 9
c v�
vw
o `y'
c
0
a
G
lim
IQ
� rn
Y o
v o
r
Agenda ItE!m No. 8A
October 27, 2009
Page 25 of 75
Population
This section identifies the assumptions and resulting population estimates and projections
for Collier County used in the parks and recreation impact fee analysis. To accurately
determine the demand for parks and recreation services, this impact fee study considers
not only the resident or permanent population of the County, but also the number of
seasonal residents and visitors as well. Therefore, for purposes of this technical analysis,
the peak seasonal population will be used and subsequent references to population in this
report pertain to the peak seasonal population of Collier County, unless otherwise noted.
Peak seasonal population figures for both countywide and unincorporated Collier County
are prepared by the Collier County Comprehensive Planning Department (dated June 11,
2008).
Collier County provides parks services and recreation facilities to all Collier County
residents and visitors. However, regional parks are larger and typically have more
facilities targeting residents throughout Collier County. On the other hand, community
parks are smaller in size and typically draw visitors from the unincorporated County, as
municipalities in Collier County have similar types of community and neighborhood
parks targeting residents within their immediate geographic area. To ensure that new
growth is receiving direct benefit from the parks and recreation impact fee, the impact fee
for regional parks is developed on a countywide basis and is charged to all new
development throughout Collier County while the impact fee for community parks is
charged only to development within the unincorporated county.
Level of Service
The current level of service (LOS) for all County -owned and maintained community and
regional parks is a combined 3.19 acres per 1,000 residents. Table 2 presents the
calculation of the current LOS for each park type included in the inventory, as well as
Collier County's adopted LOS standards according to Collier County's AUIR. As
presented, in terms of community parks, Collier County's current LOS is 1.04 acres per
1,000 residents compared to the adopted LOS standard of 1.20 acres per 1,000 residents.
Similarly, for regional parks, Collier County's current LOS is 2.15 acres per 1,000
residents compared to the adopted LOS standard of 2.90 acres per 1,000 residents. As
mentioned previously, for impact fee calculation purposes, Naples Zoo is excluded from
the inventory.
Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc. Collier County
June 2009 7 Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Study
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 27, 2009
Page 26 of 75
The impact fee cannot charge new growth at a rate to correct existing deficiencies. As
such, the current LOS should be used in the calculation of the parks and recreation impact
fee for both types of parks.
Table 2
Current Level of Service (2008)
T. Calculation Step
2008 ..:
Population(,)
:; Park
'- Acreages
Current,
LOS1-
Adopted
LOSt4j'
Unincorporated Collier County
363,799
Countywide
412,499
Parks and Recreation Level of Service (Acres
per 1,000 Residents):
Community Park
380.14
1.04
1.20
Regional Park
888.53
2.15
2.90
Total Park Acreage/ Total
Park LOS - All Parks
1,268.67
3.19
4.10
(1) Source: Collier County Comprehensive Planning Department (figures dated June 11, 2008)
(2) Source: Table 1
(3) Total parks acreage (Item 2) divided by the respective population figure (Item 1), multiplied
by 1,000 residents for each park type
(4) Source: 2008 AUIR
Table 3 presents a comparison of the parks and recreation adopted LOS standards of
surrounding counties and municipalities to Collier County's adopted LOS standards.
Based on this comparison, Collier County's adopted LOS standards are in the range of
the required acreage per 1,000 residents in other communities.
Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc. Collier County
June 2009 8 Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Study
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 27, 2009
Page 27 of 75
Table 3
Level of Service Comparison(')
Collier County - Community Park (2)
1,20
Collier County - Regional Park (3)
2.90
Collier County - Total
4.10
Hendry County(4)
22.00
St. Lucie County(s)
10.00
Charlotte County�6)
10.00
Osceola County(')
7.00
Lee County (8)
6.80
Sarasota County (9)
6.70
Palm Beach County �10�
5.12
Broward County
3.00
Miami -Dade County
2.75
Marion County
2.00
Monroe County
1.64
Escambia County (ty' 2)
1.0-2.0
Lake County
0.92
Average (excluding Collier County)
6.11
(1) Source for adopted LOS standard is each County's Comprehensive Plan,
Recreation and Open Space Element. Adopted LOS standards provided include
only community and regional, or other similar types of parks and exclude
neighborhood and local parks, where separated.
(2), (3) Source: Table 2
(4) Hendry County's adopted LOS standard includes two acres per 1,000 residents
for community parks and 20 acres per 1,000 residents for regional parks.
(5) St. Lucie County's adopted LOS standard includes five acres per 1,000 residents
for community parks and five acres per 1,000 residents for regional parks.
(6) Charlotte County's adopted LOS standard includes four acres per 1,000 residents
for resource -based parks and six acres per 1,000 residents for activity-based
parks.
(7) Osceola County's adopted LOS standard includes two acres per 1,000 residents
for community parks and five acres per 1,000 residents for regional parks.
(8) Lee County's adopted LOS standard includes 0.8 acres per 1,000 residents
for community parks and 6 acres per 1,000 residents for regional parks
(9) Sarasota County's adopted LOS standard includes 0.3 acres per 1,000 residents
for neighborhood parks, 0.4 acres per 1,000 residents for community parks, 0.9
acres per 1,000 residents for metropolitan parks, 1.8 acres per 1,000 residents for
Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc. Collier County
June 2009 9 Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Study
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 27, 2009
Page 28 of 75
highly specialized park facilities, and 3.6 acres per 1,000 residents of "other"
park acreage (including but not limited to future capacity, conservation lands,
and water access).
(10) Palm Beach County's adopted LOS standard includes 1.38 acres per 1,000
residents for district parks, 0.35 acres per 1,000 residents for beach parks, and
3.39 acres per 1,000 residents for regional parks.
(11) Monroe County adopted LOS standard includes 0.82 acres per 1,000 residents
for passive /resource -based neighborhood and community parks and 0.82 acres
per 1,000 residents for activity -based neighborhood and community parks.
(12) Escambia County LOS standard is either 1 to 2 acres per 1,000 residents,
depending on which of the four recreation service district the development is
located.
Cost Component
The total cost per resident for parks and recreation facilities consists of two components:
the cost of purchasing and developing land for each park and the cost of facilities and
equipment located at each park.
Facility and Equipment Cost
The first step in calculating the total cost for parks and recreation services in Collier
County involves estimating the replacement value of the facility and equipment cost of
the total inventory.
As presented in Table 4, the total park facility and equipment replacement value is $105.4
million, or $83,000 of equipment and facility value per acre, including facilities,
equipment, and architecture and engineering (A &E) costs. When available, the
replacement value for the parks facilities and equipment is estimated based on recent bids
or purchases made by the County for its park facilities. When recent bid /purchase
information was not available, unit costs from the County's insurance reports and recent
costs for similar facilities from other jurisdictions were used. The following table also
presents the distribution of park facility and equipment replacement values between
community and regional parks.
Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc. Collier County
June 2009 10 Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Study
Q M In
00
a)
Cm
— m
n3 o a.
-0 U
a> O
Q`
Q
id
H
O
C
E
.5
Q
W
AN
.0 V
i
U.
c
O
L
V
d
u
C
tQ
N
Y
L
a
G O
O Cn
U �
�w
O v
U O.
L
Qi
G
v7
a3
Cb
QI
U
U
Id
U
O
In
Pj
a� o
C,3 c'J
= C
= 7
ti
- n
O
C
O
Cl
O
0
O
p OO
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
CN
O
O
O
Q
O
O
O
...4
7:
M
O�
O
W
N
'7
N
�D
l�
0
00
N
Cl
O
'+i
7
M
M
N
M
vi
M
�O
f-
O
00
t�
O
�O
.o
00
N
00
00
�o
00
�,.�..6q
M
679
6�9
_M
69
p^
6N9
:A
�M�77
69
69
fA
64
69
6A
69
~
6N9
(A
61
6N9
6`'s
I's
6)
0
rr
O
O
C
O
O
O
O
O
O
69
O
O
N
N
O
O
O
69
O
O
O
69
O
O
O
69
O
C
O
6A
C
1-
C
0
o
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
w
0
r
r
'�
O
O
O
0
0
0o
O
N
M
N
h
M
O
oo
M
N
oNO
O
•--
N
6M9
6n
fA
6A
Y3 6n
N
wp
;-
O
C
O
v�
O
O
M
Mp
N
O
C
-i
Y
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
Vi
O
6A
O
O
C
O
O
O
O
69
O
O
69
O
O
O
69
O
O
O
69
o
O
C
64
O
O
O
O
O
C
6R
O
69
oC
O
609
O
oo
O
O
O
n W
a
o0
N
N
O
N
N
7
M�
�
O
.. % r:
N
un
679
NFA
69
6A
7
O
3e ...
b'9
6A
M--
69
b9
�!1
6H
b
69
6�9
69
. N'.
a�
-c
y
o
7
N
—
O
C
7
N-
O
b
0
--
0
7
0
7
0
0o
O
`p
O
O
O
O
O
N
M
+c
R imr.:
0
O+
0
O
0
N
0O
O
f,9
O
0
O
O
O
O
O
Mn
0
0
0
o
0
0
0
0
0
o
0
n
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
v
0
O
Ci
�n
_O
b9
O
I n
_
Y3
69
iA
69
h
_M
Q.
69
O
69
M
7
M
N
P2
~
69
69
6A9
6A
Al
69
679
679
69
6A
69
69
69
6o6
9�L
a9
m
m
°'
3
o
—�
n
v
a
-o
'O
o
ao
°
a,
;
o
g
s~
^
� IYL
o
E
'O
O
y
i
O
�
c
b
Ln
°
o
a
s
bU
W
o
c
is
v
coo
a
o
X
e,7
3
m
.c
Ln
m
y
x
U
pp
�-
—
O
m
c�3
o
(.D
by
vn
t
c n
o
U
ro
0.
f�
' n.
a'OiYq���
'O
v
�
C)
C
'li
x
0.
9
L
.�
.G
•o
•
�
y
S
'o
�_
'.
cNJ
CS
t0
�
O
O
O
�
O
m
O
-o
R
u
cN�
�
G
>-
•�
•�
>
.�^-
.r
m
m
t7
0]
fn
m
m
0]
U
U
gU
❑❑
g�
U
cNJ
U
cC
U
r�J
Z
�j
..+
tv
>
`L
a
a
r`j
_1
J
o`�..
d'.
0.
0.
G O
O Cn
U �
�w
O v
U O.
L
Qi
G
v7
a3
Cb
QI
U
U
Id
U
O
In
Pj
a� o
C,3 c'J
= C
= 7
ti
Q 0-) .n
00 oti
0
ON O
Z r-- o
ENS
L
m cal
a�0
O1
Q
N
O
U
c
Q
cr
_ W
^C to
Y �J
O
V V
V
72 O
F— cC
ci
y
Y
L
a
0
0
0
0
co
U
U
iC
p
8
't
v
y �
v v
�
v
v
M
O
O+
N
o0
_ W
NN3
M
O
a O
rFri
r
r
v1
r
r
A
M
00
N
o0
t�
Ni
0,
4
U
i
in
wi
p
O
C
U
c
— T
U �
^
U
i-•
—
i-.
J O
U
� O
[. V
J N U
c
b0 J
7
L V
U
F
a
> Cj
cs
m
v
v =_ 7D
w
o
4 >
to 3
v
_
v r—c
b �L p
abi
J -1z
0
0
0
0
00
0
0
0
x a
0
0
0
r
r
O
r
M
ID
. �.. y
yr ,D
p
Nom
—5
m
�
M
�A
n
ct
cd
3
>
C"
.ai
o�C
IZ
U U
V l
y
7
W
of
r
U
bR
L.
U
U
ej
v z c=
^ O
c 'o
F
v
F.,., V)
O
U O
^ w Cy
71 - -
-
� L'i
a
-o
UN
O
O
O
O
O
O
^
O
O
O
N
N
�O
N
o0
O
ds
N
o0
.fir
O
00
V
S
'D
CO
o0
Q
O,
r
O
D
N
o'3
c4 A
E5
r
b9
00
00
p
b9
h
A
A
F
v
IX
r4
—
.5,t
0
O
Q u
69
—
69
M
7
kr
M
69
`o
o
ti
N
DD
O
C
a
d
s
_
ao
7�
U
.D
O
cw
U
U
iC
p
v
y �
v v
�
v
v
a
=
i
x
.- D
`o
a O
o
a
a
U
^�
>
�._
U
i
p
O
C
U
c
— T
U �
^
U
i-•
bn
i-.
J O
U
� O
[. V
J N U
c
b0 J
7
L V
U
a
> Cj
cs
m
v
v =_ 7D
w
o
4 >
to 3
v
_
v r—c
b �L p
abi
J -1z
C)
x a
-3
v
O U n
° .J.
O
`. Z .0 -2 y
.-..
. �.. y
yr ,D
p
-
—5
ct
cd
E— O 0
IZ
U U
y
U
L.
U
U
ej
v z c=
^ O
c 'o
F
v
F.,., V)
O
U O
^ w Cy
71 - -
-
� L'i
Agenda Item No. 8A
October, 27, 2009
Page 31 of 75
It should be noted that the improvements to the North Collier Regional Park were funded
with a bond issue, which is being repaid with impact fee revenue. Therefore, to ensure
that new development is not being overcharged for these future payments, the portion of
the remaining principal for these improvements that is to be repaid with impact fee
revenue ($35.8 million) is removed from the total replacement value of the facilities in
Table 4.
Land Cost
Because of recent fluctuations in land values statewide, and in particular the large
increases in just land values in Collier County over the last few years, a detailed analysis
of the land replacement values for each type of park (and the geographic subareas within
the county) was conducted. This analysis takes into consideration appraisals and
estimates provided by Collier County staff, an analysis of recent sales of vacant land
similar in size and location to Collier County's parks, and information provided by the
Collier County Property Appraiser. More specifically, the following analysis was
conducted:
• A review of vacant land sales in subareas of the county for 2005 through 2007
was conducted to understand current land value by geographic area. In addition,
the vacant land analysis was conducted for different acreage levels. Resulting
land values were used for parks located in each geographic area. This analysis
was completed both including and excluding the waterfront property for 2007
sales.
A review of just market value of land in each geographic area as well as for
different parcel -size groups from the Property Appraiser database was conducted
and results were compared to the sales data.
• During the last update of the parks and recreational facilities impact fee, Collier
County retained the services of an appraiser to determine the value of waterfront
property. Based on this study, it was concluded that parks with beach access
should be valued at $4 million per acre and boat access areas should be valued at
$1.475 million. An evaluation of waterfront property sales confirmed these
figures to be still valid. However, the current just market value of a sample of the
properties evaluated in the appraisal study reflected a 10 percent decrease in value
since the completion of the study. Because of this and to provide a conservative
estimate, a range of $3 million to $4 million, with an average of $3.5 million was
used for beach access properties. For boat access, the sales price per acre for
Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc. Collier County
June 2009 13 Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Study
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 27, 2009
Page 32 of 75
coastal parcels ranged from $1 million to $9.5 million. In addition, the County
recently purchased a marina property appraised at $1.4 million per acre. Given
that this most recent purchase falls within the range of sales prices, the appraisal
figure of $1.4 million per acre was used to value boat access land.
Resulting average land values were reduced by approximately 5.7 percent to
reflect the property value decrease between 2007 and 2008 as reported by the
Collier County Property Appraiser.
Appendix A provides the data used for this analysis.
The cost of land for parks and recreation facilities includes more than just the purchase
cost of the land. Landscaping/site improvement and utilities /paving costs also are
considered. These costs can vary greatly, depending on the type of services offered at
each park. Based on information provided by the County, as well as information from
similarly sized jurisdictions and park types, basic landscaping, site preparation, and
irrigation costs were determined and are presented in Table 5.
Total Impact Cost per Resident
Table 5 also presents the total impact cost per resident for parks and recreation facilities
in Collier County. Using the current LOS for each park type previously presented in
Table 2, the total cost for community parks in Collier County is $442 per resident and the
total cost for regional parks is $1,090 per resident.
Table 5
Total Impact Cost per Resident
Component
Park T e
Community
Regional
Land Purchase Cost per AcreM
$200,000
$440,000
Landscaping, Site Preparation, and Irrigation Costs (per acre)'2)
$10,000
$40,000
Total Land Cost per Acre(;)
$210,000
$480,000
Facility & Equipment Cost per Acre (4)
$214,680
$26,766
Total Land & Facility Cost per Acre (5)
$424,680
$506,766
Parks LOS (acres per 1,000 Residents)(6)
1.04
2.15
Parks and Recreation Total Cost per Resident (7)
$441.67
$1,089.55
(1) Based on recent sales, information obtained from Collier County Property Appraiser
database, and other analysis (Appendix A. Tables A -1 and A -2 provide further detail)
(2) Based on information provided by Collier County Parks Department, as well as comparable
costs of similarly sized jurisdictions and parks
Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc. Collier County
June 2009 14 Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Study
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 27, 2009
Page 33 of 75
(3) Sum of the land cost per acre (Item 1) and the landscaping, site preparation, and irrigation
cost per acre (Item 2)
(4) Source: Table 4
(5) Sum of the total land cost per acre (Item 3) and the facility cost per acre (Item 4)
(6) Source: Table 2
(7) Total land & facility cost per acre (Item 5) multiplied by the current parks LOS (Item 6)
divided by 1,000
Credit Component
To avoid overcharging new development for the capital cost of providing parks and
recreation services, a review of the capital financing program for the parks and recreation
program was completed. The purpose of this review was to determine any potential
revenues generated by new development, other than impact fees, that have been used
within the last five years to fund the expansion of capital facilities, land, and equipment
related to Collier County's parks and recreation program. Based on this review, Collier
County's historical parks capital expansion improvements have been funded with grants,
Tourist Development Council (TDC) and general fund revenue.
Capital Expansion Expenditures Credit
Separate capital expenditure credits per resident were calculated for community and
regional parks, based on the non - impact fee revenue expended for capital expansion
projects for each type of park over the past five years. To calculate the capital
expenditure per resident, the average annual capital expansion expenditures for each type
of park are divided by the average residents for the same period.
Over the past six years, Collier County spent a total of $1.1 million for capital expansion
of community parks, resulting in an average annual capital expansion expenditure of
$182,000. Since the review of these expenditures spanned 2003 through 2008, the
average annual capital expansion cost is divided by the average population for this same
period. As presented in Table 6, the average capital expansion expenditure per resident
for community parks, based on this historical five year period is less than $1 per resident.
Similarly, over this same five -year period, Collier County spent a total of $26.1 million
of grants, general fund and TDC revenues for capital expansion of regional parks,
resulting in an average annual capital expansion expenditure of $4.4 million. As
presented in Table 6, the average capital expansion expenditure per resident for regional
parks during this period is $11 per resident.
Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc. Collier County
June 2009 15 Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Study
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 27, 2009
Page 34 of 75
Table 6
Capital Expansion Expenditures Credit')
-'` Description
Park Type
Total;;, .
(F1' 2003 -2008)
Grants
East Naples Community Center
C
$643,000
Barefoot Beach Outparcel
R
$1,887,984
North Collier Regional Park
R
S300,000
TDC
Ti ertail Beach Concession Building and Boardwalk
R
$434,000
Tigertail Beach Entrance Booth
R
$174,000
North Gulf Shore Boardwalk (Site lm rovement and Amenities)
R
$150,000
Vanderbilt Beach Access #1
R
$165,000
Vanderbilt Beach Access #7
R
$154,400
Vanderbilt Fishing Pier
R
$30,979
Clam Pass Southern Boardwalk
R
$14,062
Vanderbilt Beach Walkwav
R
S7,500
Connor Park Expansion
R
523,835
Fund 306 1General Fund
Gordon River Greenway Park Land Purchase
R
$17,995,000
Barefoot Beach Out parcel
R
51885,016
Freedom Park
R
$590,000
Golden Gate Community Center Maintenance Building
C
$367,556
Golden Gate Boat Ramp
C
$26,968
Golden Gate Boat Ram /Pavilion
C
S1460
Bayview Park Docks
R
$55,926
Bay-view Park Land Purchase for Parking
R
$553,684
Caxambas Park Boat Docks and Landscaping
R
558,929
Gordon Greenway Park Expansion
R
$61,025
Collier Boulevard Boat Park
R
$5,692
Boat Ramps (951 Boat Ram , Caxhambas, Cocohatchee Parks)
R
$194.299
Airport Park Expansion
C
$51,351
Goodland Park Boat Rainp Expansion
R
$374,850
Total Capital Expansion Expenditures - Community Parks
$1,091,335
A verage Annual Capital Expansion Expenditures (2003 -2008) -
Community Parks (1)
$181,889
Average Annual Population (2003 -2008) - Unincorporated County (3)
341,765
Average Annual Capital Expansion Expenditures (2003 -2008) per
Resident - Community Pm ks (4)
$0.53
Percent of Capital Expenditures Funded with General Fund -
Community Parks
41.1
Total Capital Expansion Expenditures - Regional Parks
$26,116,181
Average Annual Capital Expansion Expenditures (2003- 2008) -
Regional Parks (5)
$4, 35 2, 697
Average Annual Population (2003 -2008) - Courntrwide (6)
388,935
A verage Annual Capital Expansion Expenditures (2003 -2008) per
Resident - Regional Parks nt
$11,19
Percent of Capital Expenditures Funded with General Fund - Regional
Parks I
1
87.2
Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc. Collier County
June 2009 16 Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Study
Agenda Item No. 8A
October, 27, 2009
Page 35 of 75
(1) Source: Collier County Parks and Recreation Department
(2) Average annual capital expenditures over the six -year period for community parks
(3),(6) Source: Collier County Comprehensive Planning Department (figures dated June 11,
2008)
(4) Average annual capital expansion expenditures for community parks (Item 2) divided by
the average annual population (Item 3)
(5) Average annual capital expenditures over the five -year period for regional parks
(7) Average annual capital expansion expenditures for regional parks (Item 5) divided by the
average annual population (Item 6)
Debt Service Credit
Any outstanding bond issues related to the parks and recreation facilities also will result
in a credit to the impact fee. Collier County funded the purchase of three regional parks,
Freedom Park, Barefoot Beach Preserve, and Goodland Boating Park, through bonding.
The bond issue is being repaid with ad valorem revenues in the case of Barefoot Beach
Preserve Park and with boater registration fees in the case of Goodland Boating Park.
The debt service for the Freedom Park is being paid back both with ad valorem revenues
and State grants. A credit for the remaining debt service is provided against the impact
fee. As presented in Table 7, the resulting credit for the parks and recreation - related debt
is $28 per resident.
Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc. Collier County
June 2009 17 Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Study
Q rn un
co CD -
pN O
Z� o
ENS
O i O
C6
� O �
� v
�O
Q
U
L
vI
Q
ti d
t4 .�
r �
L
V
Q�
C
N
Y
L
a
LV
d
.o
v
7j
N
�n cd
b'
v:
..O N
U
n
� ~
to
5u
ts,
as
to
U >
CC
a. U
U
C3
y
'! cC
tn
.^
C'
a
-b
a,
-° v
=
cd
� � d
cu
y q
o c
a7
_ o p
aj Vr
Cs U
T_
U to
. ,..,
CL N ti) OC
Q C1, Q
b.:
ro ,o "
a.
v
_
Ll m
_ C�3
"
a cn
Y cz
c
O [� U
Oy
� y
y � ❑
.,
D C,5
oc
u
N
CZ CZ
o.v _ cl
cn
o
3
J
D
>
-
Old
tl O
y Y
O cn U
4)
N
3
.7 N
00
0 v
= a
s a
h
3
a nOr.
ti
M
M
L
ta
sfl N..
'-7
O
O O
i
�
d
w
u
�
r
Y
= C
CL
�
L
M
u
C Z
LV
d
v
7j
�n cd
v:
..O N
U
n
� ~
to
5u
ts,
as
to
U >
CC
a. U
U
C3
y
'! cC
tn
.^
C'
-b
a,
-° v
=
cd
cu
y q
o c
a7
_ o p
aj Vr
Cs U
T_
U to
. ,..,
CL N ti) OC
Q C1, Q
n L_
ro ,o "
a.
v
_
Ll m
_ C�3
"
a cn
Y cz
c
O [� U
Oy
� y
y � ❑
.,
D C,5
oc
u
N
CZ CZ
o.v _ cl
cn
o
3
J
D
>
-
Old
tl O
y Y
O cn U
N
3
.7 N
00
0 v
= a
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 27, 2009
Page 37 of 75
Net Parks and Recreation Impact Cost
The net parks and recreation impact fee per resident is the difference between the cost
component and the credit component. Table 8 summarizes the calculation of the net
parks and recreation cost per residents for both community and regional parks.
The first section of Table 8 identifies the total impact cost as $442 per resident for
community parks, and $1,090 per resident for regional parks. The second section of the
table identifies the revenue credits for the parks and recreation impact fee. The credit
calculation includes credits totaling approximately $9 for the single family land use and
$8 for all other residential land uses for community parks. Similarly, revenue credits
calculated for the regional parks impact fee totals $240 for the single family land use and
$194 for all other residential land uses.
The difference between the two credit figures takes into consideration that new single
family homes pay a higher level of ad valorem tax than existing homes due to the State
law that caps annual increases on property tax assessments for homesteaded property. A
comparison of the new home sales and the value of existing homes indicate that new
home taxable values are 53 percent higher than the taxable value of an existing home.
Thus, the ad valorem credit for a new single family home is increased by 53 percent to
reflect that it generates more taxes than an existing home. Since other residential land
uses are not afforded the same type of cap on their taxable property value, such an
adjustment is not provided.
The net impact cost per resident is the difference between the total impact cost and the
total revenue credit per resident. This results in a net impact cost of $433 per resident for
the single family land use and a net impact cost of approximately $434 per resident for all
other residential land uses for community parks. The net impact cost for the regional
parks is $849 per resident for the single family detached land use and a net impact cost of
approximately $895 per resident for all other residential land uses.
Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc. Collier County
June 2009 19 Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Study
¢MLn
°0 °o
p (V O
Z 00
2—d)
m Oa-
73 v
�O
wMI
NW
1�
co ALA,
CL
0)
A, i.
W
N
lC O
V
CL
E
}J
W
Z
�t r vi N
v9 v9 V v'i [fi v9
O r M vl
M � O
7 69 N
77
Q
O�
6fi
A I I 1
O U
O
Co
U
U
x
cC
Y
cd
Llr
0
CV
w
U
O
_Q
"Cl
O�
yo
� N
'7 y
C
tn
CC �:
00
P
V7
6011
466
U
r
m
�i
63
c
6A
Vi
Q3
L
U
R
�
J
.ir
^
y
q
V
72
2
Co
a
�
-73
.
�
O
en
O
LLJ
'il
Cl
11
>'
'..'
y
'S'
Ll—
U
'Z:3
y
=
W
e
y
Y
T-
Li
r
u
d
a
J
a
s
O
')
3
_
y
U
O
R
—
O U
O
Co
U
U
x
cC
Y
cd
Llr
0
CV
w
U
O
_Q
"Cl
O�
yo
� N
'7 y
C
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 27, 2009
Page 39 of 75
(1) Source: Table 5
(2), (4) Source: Table 6
(3) The present value of the capital improvement credit per resident (Item 2) at a capitalization rate of 4.5
percent with a capitalization period of 25 years. The discount rate of 4.5 percent is determined based
on a review of interest on existing bond issues and represents the rate at which Collier County is
likely to borrow in the future.
(5) Source: Based on a review of the County's budgets for the last five fiscal years
(6) Capital expansion credit per resident (Item 3) multiplied by the percent of capital expansion
expenditures funded with general fund (Item 4) multiplied by the portion of the general fund funded
with ad valorem revenues (Item 5)
(7) The portion of the capital expansion credit funded with ad valorem per resident (Item 6) increased by
the ratio of the value of new home sales to the taxable value of existing homes (53 %)
(8) The capital expansion credit per resident (Item 3) less the portion of the capital expansion credit
funded with ad valorem revenue per resident (Item 6) for both groups of park types
(9), (10) Source: Table 7
(11) Debt service credit per resident (Item 9) multiplied by the percent of debt service funded with
general fund (Item 10) multiplied by the portion of the general fund funded with ad valorem
revenues (Item 5)
(12) The portion of the debt service credit funded with ad valorem per resident (Item 11) increased by
the ratio of the value of new home sales to the taxable value of existing homes (53 %)
(13) The debt service credit per resident (Item 9) less the portion of the capital expansion credit funded
with ad valorem revenue per resident (Item 11)
(14) Sum of the adjusted ad valorem funded capital expansion credit per resident (Item 7), non -ad
valorem funded capital expansion credit per resident (Item 8), adjusted ad valorem debt service
credit per resident (Item 12), and non -ad valorem funded debt service credit per resident (Item 13)
for both groups of park types; debt service credit applied only to regional parks.
(15) Sum of the capital improvement credit per resident (Item 3) and debt service credit per resident
(Item 9); debt service credit applied only to regional parks.
(16) Total impact cost per resident (Item 1) less the total revenue credit per resident (Item 14)
(17) Total impact cost per resident (Item 1) less the total revenue credit per resident (Item 15)
Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc. Collier County
June 2009 21 Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Study
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 27, 2009
Page 40 of 75
Calculated Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Schedule
Table 9 presents the calculated community parks and recreation impact fee schedule
developed for residential land uses. Due to its location along the Gulf Coast, Collier
County has high levels of tourism during its peak season. Tourists staying in hotels and
motels in Collier County also are afforded the opportunity to visit the County's parks and
enjoy the recreation facilities provided. Therefore, it is appropriate to include hotels and
motels in the County's parks and recreation fee schedule. As previously mentioned, due
to the limited service area of community parks, only residential and hotel /motel
development within unincorporated Collier County is assessed a community parks and
recreation impact fee.
Table 9
Calculated Parks & Recreation Impact Fee Schedule
Community Parks
Land Use
Impact
Unit
Unincorporated
County Residents
per Unit(i)
Community Parks
Net Cost per„
Resident (2)
Total
Impact Fee(3)
Single Family Detached
0 to 1,500 sf
du
2.77
$432.86
$1,199.02
1,501 to 2,499 sf
du
3.04
$432.86
$1,315.89
2,500 sf or greater
du
3.34
$432.86
$1,445.75
Multi-family
du
1.64
$433.81
$711.45
Mobile Home /RV (Tied Down)
du
2.18
$433.81
$945.71
Hotel /Motel
room 1
1.16
$433.81
$503.22
(1) Source: Appendix B. Table B -1 for all land uses except hotel /motel. For the hotel /motel land
use, it is assumed that there is one person per room for all business - related trips (34% of total
hotel /motel occupancies in Collier County) and 2 people per room for leisure trips (66% of
total hotel /motel occupancies in Collier County). The resulting residents per unit figure is
then adjusted to account for the County's average hotel /motel occupancy rate (70 %). Source
for distribution of business and leisure trips, as well as the average occupancy rate is the
Collier County Visitors and Convention Bureau 2007 Annual Report.
(2) Source: Table 8
(3) Residents per unit (Item 1) for each land use category multiplied by the net cost per resident
(Item 2)
Table 10 presents the calculated regional parks and recreation impact fee schedule
developed for Collier County. As previously mentioned, due to the large geographical
service area of a regional parks, all new residential and hotel /motel development within
Collier County is assessed a regional parks and recreation impact fee.
Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc. Collier County
June 2009 22 Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Study
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 27, 2009
Page 41 of 75
Table 10
Calculated Parks & Recreation Impact Fee Schedule
Regional Parks
� 5, r
��. r has a
Land Use;"
r
Im acE
a P
i7n1ef
Countywide
_
R' esdent
c z r ti12'sa^
Llnit�it
t t .
A6 Re onal Parks
.t Net Cost peck
a �g
Resident
Totai.
Impact Feed
Single Family Detached
0 to 1,500 sf
du
2.59
$849.30
$2,199.69
1,501 to 2,499 sf
du
2.85
$849.30
$2,420.51
2,500 sf or greater
du
3.14
$849.30
$2,666.80
Multi - family
du
1.45
$895.35
$1,298.26
Mobile Hoine/RV (Tied Down) I
du
1 2.14
$895.35
$1,916.05
Hotel /Motel I
room
1 1.16
$895.35T
$1,038.61
(1) Source: Appendix B, Table B -2 for all land uses except hotel /motel. For the hotel /motel land
use, it is assumed that there is one person per room for all business - related trips (34% of total
hotel /motel occupancies in Collier County) and 2 people per room for leisure trips (66% of
total hotel /motel occupancies in Collier County). The resulting residents per unit figure is
then adjusted to account for the County's average hotel /motel occupancy rate (70 %). Source
for distribution of business and leisure trips, as well as the average occupancy rate is the
Collier County Visitors and Convention Bureau 2007 Annual Report.
(2) Source: Table 8
(3) Residents per unit (Item 1) for each land use category multiplied by the net cost per resident
(Iterrr 2)
Impact Fee Schedule Comparison
As part of the work effort in updating Collier County's parks and recreation impact fee
program, a comparison of parks and recreation impact fee schedules was completed for
surrounding counties and counties of similar population throughout Florida. Table 11
presents this comparison. As presented, Collier County's calculated fee is on the high
end of the range. This is primarily due to the availability of beach parks, higher -than-
average land replacement value per acre, and an extensive recreation facilities inventory.
In addition, the County has a lower- than - average revenue credit, as it is the County's
policy to fund parks and recreation expansion expenditures with impact fee revenue.
Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc. Collier County
June 2009 23 Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Study
CD
o®o
/%"t
_2¥\
%%/
\/
a
0
§
j
j
2
§
CD
2
\
I
§
§
)
]
J9
2
\�
3/
)
)
/
\§
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 27, 2009
Page 43 of 75
Policy Issues
The scope of services for the parks and recreational facilities impact fee update study
included a list of issues to be considered by TOA. This section of the report lists these
issues and provides a response.
• Issues 1 through 3: The question was raised whether state and federal parks with
beach access should be counted toward the adopted LOS standard, and therefore,
result in less of a need for the County to provide these parks. Similarly, the
possibility of including municipally owned park land and privately held
recreational facilities within the inventory or adjusting the population numbers to
exclude residents within gated communities with recreational activities was
inquired.
Response: All of these approaches would result in discounting the fee in a
disguised way. It is recommended to calculate the full fee, and then reduce the
fee through a policy decision, if desired. In other words, this is entirely a policy
decision.
• Issue 4: The Productivity Committee asked whether demographics can be
factored into the LOS within the Impact Fee Study in terms of certain age groups
being more active users of parks, etc.
Response: We are not aware of any data or analysis that provides this
information. Even if such data were available, it would be necessary for Collier
County to conduct a park user survey to verify conclusions of national data.
• Issue 5: The Productivity Committee requested a review of operational costs in
terms of actual spending vs. established level of service.
Response: During the initial meeting with the Productivity Committee, the Parks
Department agreed to provide this information.
• Issue 6: The Productivity Committee asked that the Consultant would review
other competitive economic data versus historical data.
Response: TOA included current replacement values for all assets, as available.
In cases, when the current replacement value was not available, a conservative
Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc. Collier County
June 2009 25 Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Study
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 27, 2009
Page 44 of 75
figure was used based on information obtained from insurance reports and data
from other jurisdictions.
• Issue 7: The possibility of collaboration with non - county entities to provide
parks (public- private partnerships, co- locating, etc.).
Response: This is again a policy decision. If such opportunities exist and if the
Board of County Commissioners supports such collaborations, the impact fees
could be reduced.
• Issue 8: Provide comparative LOS information from other counties.
Response: Provided in Tables 4 and 11.
• Issue 9: The Productivity Committee also asked about the inclusion of donated
land in the inventory.
Response: County staff reviewed all known past donations and determined that
these were all made for neighborhood parks. These parks are not included in the
inventory used for impact fee calculations.
Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc. Collier County
June 2009 26 Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Study
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 27, 2009
Page 45 of 75
Appendix A
Land Valuation Analysis
Supplemental Information
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 27, 2009
Page 46 of 75
This Appendix provides the back -up data and information on land values. As explained
in the report, several steps were undertaken to determine the land values for the impact
fee calculations. These include:
• A review of vacant land sales in subareas of the County for 2005 through 2007
was conducted to understand current land value by geographic area. In addition,
the vacant land analysis was conducted for different acreage levels. Resulting
land values were used for parks located in each geographic area. This analysis
was completed both including and excluding the waterfront property for 2007
sales. Tables A -1 and A -2 provide the final land values used for each park. Table
A -3 provides a summary of sales information for 2007. Finally, Table A -7
includes the average cost over the past three years in various districts.
• A review of just market value of land in each geographic area as well as for
different parcel -size groups from the Property Appraiser database was conducted
and results were compared to the sales data. Table A -3 provides this information.
• During the last update of the parks and recreational facilities impact fee, Collier
County retained the services of an appraiser to determine the value of waterfront
property. Based on the study's findings, park land with beach access was valued
at $4 million per acre and boat access areas were valued at $1.475 million per
acre. An evaluation of waterfront property sales confinned these figures to be
still valid. Tables A -4 and A -6 provide the results of vacant land sales analysis
for beach front and coastal parcels. However, the current just market value of a
sample of the properties evaluated in the appraisal study reflected a 10 percent
decrease in value since the completion of the study. This information is provided
in Table A -5 for parcels that were included in the 2005 Collier County Park Land
Value Study and had relatively high land value.
Because of this decrease in market values, and to provide a conservative estimate,
a range of $3 million to $4 million, with an average of $3.5 million was used for
beach access properties. The sales price per acre for coastal parcels ranged from
$1 million to $9.5 million. This information is provided in Table A -6. In
addition, the County recently purchased a marina property appraised at $1.4
million per acre. Given that this most recent purchase falls within the low end of
sales prices, the appraisal figure of $1.4 million per acre was used to value boat
access land.
Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc. Collier County
June 2009 A -1 Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Study
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 27, 2009
Page 47 of 75
Resulting average land values were reduced by approximately 5.7 percent to
reflect the property value decrease between 2007 and 2008 as reported by the
Collier County Property Appraiser.
Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc. Collier County
June 2009 A -2 Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Study
amLO CD r-
CD
pN O
Z��
Q7
— cz
� U
Q
N
Y
m
a
�o
C
O
m
Q'
C
O
m
c
16
J
T T
C �
� v
O (/
v W
� U
:u c
E
O
c
R
a
5
y
Q
v O
Ov
� C
_ y B
O
O
0 0
0
0 0
0 0
vi O
O vi
0
0
oo
O
0
0
0
0`
N
. � �
�
b9
R
69
•-- 69
69
69 -
— —
b9 fA
— a0
69 69
? Vf
Vi
— C
b9 69
—
69
69
Vi
N
69
69
—
69
N
69
�
OC 0
0 0
0
�
bpi
s.9
69 w
65 �
sw
vi
ds
L
69
69 C
69 69
U09
69
609 O
O 6?
69 0
O
CM
O
O
v�
O
W
C
O
.
': F 4
69
69
0�9
b9
�
6A
69
6N9
y ^
O
O O
O
Q O
=
O
ry
o
v�
y Q
v'�i
69
v'r'i
b9 69
�n
69 69
69
� �
69 V?
=
69 69
•r °
69 69
�
69 69
69
NM
69
ry
69
�
6N9
bN9
U �L
O 4
,e
L' c
a$:.a
w
a`
�
T
—
3
y
u
v
m
z
S
m
°
T T
C �
� v
O (/
v W
� U
:u c
E
O
c
R
a
5
y
Q
v O
Ov
� C
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 27, 2009
Page 49 of 75
(1), (2), (4) Source: Collier County Parks Department and 2007 AUIR
(3) Source: Total acreage (Item 4) less the beach and boat access acreage (Items 1 and 2)
(5) Source: Table A -3
(6) Inland acreage (Item 3) multiplied by the inland cost per acre (Item 5)
(7) Waterfront acreage (Items 1 and 2) multiplied by appropriate unit costs (Item 15 and 16)
(8) Sum of inland and waterfront land values (Items 6 and 7)
(9), (10), (11) Based on the County's appraisal of the North Collier Regional District. In the case
of Tigertail Beach Park and Barefoot Beach Preserve Community Park, because there was no
sales data was available for the larger parks in these districts, the County's appraisal for the
North Collier Regional Park is used to provide a conservative estimate.
(12), (13) The Source: Collier County purchase price
(14) Weighted average land value is reduced by the decrease of just market values from 2007 to
2008 (5.7 %), as reported by the Collier County Property Appraiser
(15), (16) Based on information shown in Tables A -4 thru A -6 and the appraisal completed for the
County for the newly acquired marine property
Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc. Collier County
June 2009 A -4 Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Study
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 27, 2009
Page 50 of 75
Table A -2
Final Land Valuation — Community Parks
x*
District—
,
N<
Inland= 'j
Total ',
Coat per Acre
l
Total Inland
4) nd aue
North Naplec
Veterans Community Park
43.64
43.64
$450.000
$19.638.000
Pelican Bay Community Park
15.00
15.00
$450.000
$6.750.000
Osceola Elementary School (5)
N Al
MA
Vineyards Community Park
35.50
35.501
$450.000
$15,975.000
Golden Gate _
, .
Golden Gate Community Park
35.00
35.00
$230.000
$8.050.000
Golden Gate Community Center"'
21.00
21.00
$230.000
$4.830.000
Golden Gate Greenway
3.00
3.00
$75.000
$225.000
East Naples
..._ ...:_ .
East Naples Community Park
47.00
47.00
$120.000
$5.640.000
Gulfcoast Community Park
5.00
1 5.00
$500.000
$1500.000
South Naples
Eagle Lakes Community Park
32.00
32.00
$120.000
$3.840.000
Manatee Community Park
60.00
60.00
$120.000
$7.200.000
Immokalee-
hnmokalee Community Park
23.00
23.00
$50.000
$1.150.000
Immokalee Sports Complex
14.00
14.00
$50.000
$700.000
Airport Park
19.00
1400
$50.000
$950.000
Toror Rosbou gh Community park
7.00
7.00
$50.000
$350.000
Urban Estates
Max A. Hasse Community_ Park'7)
30.00
20.00
$230.000
$4.600.000
Corkscrew Elementary. "'
N A
N A
N'A
Sabal Palm Elementary')
N .A
N A
N -A
Total
380.14
$82-198,000
Weighted Average Land Value
$216,757
Adjusted Weighted Average Land Value("))
$204,380
(1), (2) Source: Collier County Parks Department and 2007 AUIR
(3) Source: Table A -3; note: cost per acre for South Naples based on East Naples values
(4) Inland acreage (Item 1) multiplied by the inland cost per acre (Item 3)
(5), (8), (9) The County does not own the land, but owns the facilities.
(6), (7) Land value per acre is based on the County's appraisal of the Golden Gate Community Park due
to similar size.
(10) Weighted average land value is reduced by the decrease of just market values from 2007 to 2008
(5.7 %), as reported by the Collier County Property Appraiser
Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc. Collier County
June 2009 A -5 Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Study
Q M Lo
CC) C) r-
rm
E:
cc
mom
(130
a)
t
K
W
mo
R
E
E
0
m
m
-i
-a
0.
ttl
O
Y o0
N vi
43
dw
O
do
E §
O
0
C,
CI O
0
8
0
0
0
O
0
0
0 C,
C, 0
z
z
z z
C!
z z
z
z
zZ
z z
z z
z
z z
10
0
z
z
zz
z
z z
z
z z
o
z
z z
0
IN
z
z
z Z
o
z z
q
z z
z
n
z
Vl
69 V3
yq 1A
b9
fH
cl
z
O n
z
z
7 N
z
00
N. z
C i7
-F 75
O
0 M
O
O
O O.
z
o 0
00
aY
4Y
Vi b9
Vi
69 fA
4H 69
V3
�a9
69 65
-z:7
-t7 -6
C6
Q.
n
z
ol
aw-
O
0
-V
'm
6
A
'Q
6
't
0
6
C5
-a
0.
ttl
O
Y o0
N vi
43
dw
O
do
E §
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 27, 2009
Page 52 of 75
Table A -4
2007 Beach Front Parcel Sales
,
<` Parcel ID
Location
Sales Price
Size .
(Acres) '�
Price per,
Acre'' ''
Fire District_
74081400008
Beach
$617,500
2.30
$268,478
Collier County Fire
14600120004
Beach
$12,000,000
1.68
$7,135,637
City of Naples Fire
19247500053
Beach
$6,315,000
0.60
$10,525,000
City ofNaples Fire
Min
$617,500
0.60
$268,478
0.22
Max
$12,000,000
2.30
$10,525,000
Yes
Weighted Average
7/2/2004
$4,132,200
$675,000
Source: Collier County Property Appraiser parcel database
Table A -5
Collier County Land Value Study Parcels — Updated Values
ID ' = -'
Sale Date
Size
Sale Price
Price/AC
2008 Land
Value
Value/AC
Waterfront
(Y�
Northwest Naples
12780640008
4/25/2005
0.50
$2,500,000
$5,000.000
$1,738,108
$3,476,216
Yes
27581640001
12/20/2004
0.21
$1,000,000
$4,761,905
$759,000
$3,614,286
Yes
27637320000
7/5/2004
0.22
$699,900
$3,181,364
$728,640
$3,312,000
Yes
27582880006
7/2/2004
0.25
$675,000
$2,700,000
$819,720
$3,278,880
Yes
27637240009
7/15/2003
0.22
$540,000
$2,454,545
$8W6001$3.680,000
Yes
Southwest Naples
17360560008
4/18/2005
0.94
$6,100,000
$6,489,362
$5,728,061
$6,093,682
Yes
08930200008
& 40000
91/22/2004
1.20
$4,000,000
$3,333,333
S3,371,5601$2,809,633
Yes
Weighted Average 3.541 $15,514,9001 $4,382,7401 $13,954,6891 $3,942,003
Source: Parcels selected and corresponding sales data from the 2005 Land Value
Study; 2008 updated land values are from the Collier County Property
Appraiser parcel database
Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc. Collier County
June 2009 A -7 Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Study
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 27, 2009
Page 53 of 75
Table A -6
2007 Coastal Parcel Sales
Between $1,000,000 and $10,000,000 Cost per Acre
'4. T
Parcel Ili ,
w�.
; Y,ocaftoa
'` u
..� .Ss''Y
Safes Pnce
3 S.ze
k'.;.r?• t:
Pace�ert
n.�{,rdL 7 _
. r
"„'i GS,Y 1',�t' iY'`.` �'.
Fire Distract
57369600000
Coastal
$315,000
0.31
$1,016,129
Marco Island Fire
56731320003
Coastal
$399,000
0.36
$1,108,949
Marco Island Fire
83491200009
Coastal
$1,600,000
1.37
$1,167,883
Ocho ee Fire
57667840009
Coastal
$305,000
0.20
$1,506,917
Marco Island Fire
58105400007
Coastal
$1,000,000
0.66
$1,515,152
Marco Island Fire
57310320009
Coastal
$390,000
0.25
$1,538,462
Marco Island Fire
57740120002
Coastal
$325,000
0.20
$1,610,505
Marco Island Fire
57737520000
Coastal
$350,000
0.20
$1,727,542
Marco Island Fire
57682200006
Coastal
$350,000
0.20
$1,735,250
Marco Island Fire
65571040000
Coastal
$465,000
0.26
$1,788,462
North Naples Fire
56938480005
Coastal
$390,000
0.21
$1,837,023
Marco Island Fire
57676880005
Coastal
$645,500
0.34
$1,874,818
Marco Island Fire
57207280003
Coastal
$550,000
0.28
$1,967,096
Marco Island Fire
57366080005
Coastal
$408,500
0.20
$2,016,288
Marco Island Fire
58041160003
Coastal
$750,000
0.37
$2,027,027
Marco Island Fire
56797760005
Coastal
$550,000
0.27
$2,073,906
Marco Island Fire
57859120003
Coastal
$425,000
0.20
$2,102,919
Marco Island Fire
26081080007
Coastal
$300,000
0.14
$2,138,275
Ocho ee Fire
56871600007
Coastal
$439,100
0.20
$2,167,325
Marco Island Fire
57397600001
Coastal
$499,000
0.23
$2,173,345
Marco Island Fire
57753400007
Coastal
$655,000
0.30
$2,183,333
Marco Island Fire
57860680008
Coastal
$450,000
0.20
$2,224,419
Marco Island Fire
57391320002
Coastal
$460,000
0.21
$2,225,448
Marco Island Fire
57857680008
Coastal
$700,000
0.31
$2,274,204
Marco Island Fire
58106640002
Coastal
$2,560,000
1.09
$2,351,212
Marco Island Fire
56800640009
Coastal
$480.000
0.20
$2,380,952
Marco Island Fire
56804640005
Coastal
$504,000
0.20
$2,483,982
Marco Island Fire
56944160005
Coastal
$850,000
0.30
$2,788,714
Marco Island Fire
56804600003
Coastal
$588,000
0.20
$2,899,408
Marco Island Fire
57807800003
Coastal
$1,500,000
0.51
$2,933,125
Marco Island Fire
56670120005
Coastal
$1,335,000
0.42
$3,202,975
Marco Island Fire
57863280007
Coastal
$850,000
0.23
$3,695,652
Marco Island Fire
58045320001
Coastal
$775,000
0.20
$3,830,944
Marco Island Fire
58100240000
Coastal
$770,000
0.18
$4,277,778
Marco Island Fire
57859840008
Coastal
$1,000,000
0.23
$4,347,826
Marco Island Fire
56788720009
Coastal 1
$1,700,0001
0.34
$4,956,268
Marco Island Fire
Tindale - Oliver & Associates, Inc. Collier County
June 2009 A -8 Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Study
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 27, 2009
Page 54 of 75
Table A -6 (Continued)
2007 Coastal Parcel Sales
Between $1,000,000 and $10,000,000 Cost per Acre
Parcel ID
Location
Sales Price
Size
Price per
)v; re Distract' z`
58113800000
Coastal
$3,000,000
0.59
$5,084,746
Marco Island Fire
58116360000
Coastal
$3,500,000
0.59
$5,932,203
Marco Island Fire
52342680000
Coastal
$975,000
0.16
$6,093,750
Isle of Capri Fire
56782400008
Coastal
$1,900,000
0.31
$6,129,032
Marco Island Fire
83540604103
Coastal
$500,000
0.08
$6,250,000
Ocho ee Fire
1781600003
Coastal
$2,125,000
0.32
$6,640,625
City of Naples Fire
16810400004
Coastal
$3,500,000
0.48
$7,291,667
City ofNa les Fire
16960120001
Coastal
$5,350,000
0.59
$9,067,797
City of Naples Fire
56799760003
Coastal
$3,500,000
0.37
$9,459,459
Marco Island Fire
Min
$300,000
0.08
$1,016,129
Max
$5,350,000
1.37
$9,459,459
,Weighted Average 1
1
$3,311,981
Source: Collier County Property Appraiser parcel database
Note: Sales less than $1 million cost per acre and higher than $10 million cost per acre are
excluded. The weighted average cost per acre of all sales including outliers is
approximately $4 million per acre.
Table A -7
Recent Vacant Land Sales Summary by District
District
Acreage
Category,
Price Per Acre
20052006
2007
3 -Year
Avera e
Marco Island
0.5-5.00
$956,979
$340,385
$662,500
$653,288
North Naples
0.5-5.00
$481,212
$547,340
$601,833
$543,462
5.01 -20.00
$481,226
$295,988
$632,736
$469,983
Golden Gate
0.5-5.00
$87,402
$114,482
$74,7981
$92,227
5.01 -20.00
$136,328
$541,949
$83,6121
$253,963
East Naples
0.5-5.00
$475,659
5563,375
$542,8191
$527,284
5.01 -20.00
$241,952
$75,059
$97,087
$138,033
Immokalee &
Big Corkscrew
0.5-5.00 1
$67,057
$68,577
$53,307
562,981
5.01 -20.00 1
$71,5481
$120,733
$34,685
$75,655
Source: Collier County Property Appraiser parcel database; includes all sales less
than $10,000 cost per acre and above 51.000,000 cost per acre were
excluded.
Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc. Collier County
June 2009 A -9 Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Study
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 27, 2009
Page 55 of 75
APPENDIX B
Population Analysis
Supplemental Information
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 27, 2009
Page 56 of 75
Residential land uses to be used in the Collier County parks and recreation impact fee
calculations include the following:
• Single Family Detached
• Multi - Family
• Mobile Home
• Retirement Community /Senior Adult Housing
Table B -1 presents the number of residents per housing unit for the residential categories
identified above for unincorporated Collier County, while Table B -2 presents similar
information on a countywide basis. Different from the previous study, this analysis uses
peak seasonal population and includes all housing units, both occupied and vacant. The
previous study used Census permanent residents and occupied housing units. The update
study provides an average figure for all types of residents ( pennanent and seasonal) of the
County instead of basing the figures only on Census pennanent residents. In addition,
this study calculates demand (measured in terns of people per household) separately for
community and regional parks. The previous study used the same set of figures for both
categories.
To address fairness and equity issues between land uses, as well as to address affordable
housing issues, the single family land use is continued to be tiered based on three
categories of square footage: 1,500 square feet or less, 1,501 to 2,499 square feet, and
greater than 2,500 square feet. To accommodate the tiering of impact fee assessments for
the single family residential land use category, an analysis was completed based on
housing unit size and persons per housing unit, comparing nationwide averages to those
of the unincorporated Collier County. This analysis utilized national data from the 2005
American Housing Survey (AHS) and data from the 2000 Census data for the
unincorporated Collier County to examine this relationship.
To calculate the tiering for the three different categories, national residents per unit ratios
for each housing unit category were applied to the total residents per housing unit ratio
for single family detached land use.
Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc. Collier County
June 2009 B -1 Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Study
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 27, 2009
Page 57 of 75
Table B -1
Residents per Housing Unit — Unincorporated County
-fix s.
,
R;.� s e� s. ir t d eFa4n
k t'.
ng Ty
; P i
ousing Units
Ratio A
..
Housing Units
Single Family Detached
138,532
45,509
3.04
0to1,500sf
91%
277
- 1,501 to 2,499 sf
1
100%
3.04
2,500 sf or greater
110%
3.34
Multi Family
90,768
55,296
1.64
Mobile Home /RV (Tied Down)
22,781
10,465
2.18
(1) Source: 2000 Census, Table H -33, adjusted for seasonal population based on the ratio of
peak seasonal to permanent population for the year 2000 using population figures provided
by the Collier County Comprehensive Planning Department (dated June 11, 2008)
(2) Source: 2000 Census, Table H -30
(3) Ratios developed based on national persons per household data derived from the 2005
American Housing Survey
Table B -2
Residents per Housing Unit — Countywide
(1) Source: 2000 Census, Table H -33, adjusted for seasonal population based on the ratio of
peak seasonal to permanent population for the year 2000 using population figures provided
by the Collier County Comprehensive Planning Department (dated June 11, 2008)
(2) Source: 2000 Census, Table H -30
(3) Ratios developed based on national persons per household data derived from the 2005
American Housing Survey
Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc. Collier County
June 2009 B -2 Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Study
Residents J
,.; Housing Type .y.
Populationt1�K`
Housing Units
.: Ratioll. '
Housing Units
Single Family Detached
162,266
56,869
2.85
- 0 to 1,500 sf
91%
2.59
- 1,501 to 2,499 sf
1
100%1
2.85
- 2,500 sf or greater
110%
3.14
Multi Family
110,142
75,775
1.45
Mobile Home /RV (Tied Down)
23,052
10,772
2.14
(1) Source: 2000 Census, Table H -33, adjusted for seasonal population based on the ratio of
peak seasonal to permanent population for the year 2000 using population figures provided
by the Collier County Comprehensive Planning Department (dated June 11, 2008)
(2) Source: 2000 Census, Table H -30
(3) Ratios developed based on national persons per household data derived from the 2005
American Housing Survey
Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc. Collier County
June 2009 B -2 Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Study
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 27, 2009
Page 58 of 75
APPENDIX C
Distribution of Parks and Recreation Inventory
Value for Indexing Calculations
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 27, 2009
Page 59 of 75
This appendix presents the distribution of regional and community park asset values
included in the impact fee calculations. This distribution will be used for indexing
calculations.
Table C -1 presents the distribution of the asset value for regional parks.
Table C -1
Parks and Recreation Inventory Distribution — Regional Parks
Cost Com° onent
Figure
: "` Distribution
Land Purchase(l)
$390,953,200
86.8%
Site Improvements (2)
$35,541,200
7.9%
Facilities /Equipment(3)
$23,782,137
5.3%
Total Cost - Regional Parks
$450,276,537
(1) Regional parks acreage from Table 1 multiplied by the purchase cost
per acre for regional parks from Table 5
(2) Regional parks acreage from Table I multiplied by landscaping, site
prep, and irrigation cost per acre for regional parks from Table 5
(3) Regional parks facilities and equipment cost from Table 4 (Owned
Facility and Equipment Value)
Table C -2 presents the distribution of the asset value for community parks.
Table C -2
Parks and Recreation Inventory Distribution — Community Parks
Cost Component,
Distribution
Land Purchase(')
$76,028,000
47.1%
Site Improvements (2)
$3,801,400
2.4%
Facilities /Equipment(3)
$81,608,582
50.6%
Total Cost - Community Parks 1
$161,437,982
(1) Community parks acreage from Table 1 multiplied by the purchase
cost per acre for community parks from Table 5
(2) Community parks acreage from Table 1 multiplied by landscaping,
site prep, and irrigation cost per acre for community parks from
Table 5
(3) Community parks facilities and equipment cost from Table 4
(Owned Facility and Equipment Value)
Table C -3 presents the distribution of the total asset value for all community and regional
parks.
Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc. Collier County
June 2009 C -1 Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Study
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 27, 2009
Page 60 of 75
Table C -3
Parks and Recreation Inventory Distribution — All Parks
Cost Component
Figure
Distribution
Land Purchase(')
$466,981,200
76.3%
Site Improvements (2)
$39342,600
6.4%
Facilities /Equipment(3)
$105,390,719
17.2%
Total Cost - All Parks
$611,714,519
(1) Source: Sum of the regional parks land purchase cost from Table
C -I — Item 1 and community parks land purchase cost from Table
C -2 — Item 1
(2) Source: Sum of the regional parks site improvement cost from
Table C -1 — Item 2 and community parks site improvement cost
from Table C -2 — Item 2
(3) Source: Sum of the regional parks facility /equipment cost from
Table C -1— Item 3 and community parks facility /equipment cost
from Table C -2 — Item 3
Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc. Collier County
June 2009 C -2 Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Study
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 27, 2009
Page 61 of 75
EXHIBIT A
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 27, 2009
Page 62 of 75
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
PRODUCTIVITY COMMITTEE
3301 East Tamiami Trail
Naples, FL 34112
August 26, 2009
Board of County Commissioners
3301 Tamiami Trail East
Naples, Florida 34112
Dear Commissioners,
At our meeting on August 19, 2009, the Productivity Committee discussed the
Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Study as prepared by Tindale - Oliver & Associates
JOA).
At a previous meeting, we recommended that TOA provide several alternative
calculations to the land component of the impact fee. In particular, we asked them to:
• Use inland park land values from eastern Collier County (rather than land costs
in North Naples and Marco), since that is where 95% of the new parks are
planned.
• Minimize the coastal land component, since there will be few coastal properties
purchased in the future and those will be limited to smaller acreages.
• Propose a methodology to recognize that a significant amount of park land
developed in the next 10 years will be transferred from other governmental
activities and park impact fees will not pay for this land.
TOA subsequently prepared 4 scenarios to address these concerns. All
assumed that future inland park land purchases will be in the eastern part of the county.
Each scenario handled beach and boat access land values differently.
We felt that Scenario 4, where 75% of beach and boat access land value is
based on actual market values and the remaining 25% is capped at $230,000, was the
most accurate estimate of future land costs. Scenario 4 will represent a reduction to the
Parks and Recreation Impact Fees originally proposed by TOA.
In addition, we agree with TOA that the transfer of future park land can be
handled as a credit for donated land in subsequent impact fee updates.
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 27, 2009
Page 63 of 75
The outside counsel recommends that the methodology be adopted as proposed
in the Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Study by TOA, but that a percentage reduction
be applied, based on the recommended land acquisition scenario. This action keeps the
integrity of the original study and formula calculations and allows the fee to be reduced
by a BCC policy decision.
Sincerely,
Stephen Harrison
Chairman
Productivity Committee
Agenda o
October 0 •
Page 64 of 75
Tindale- Oliver 8. Associates, Inc.
Memo
To: Amy Patterson / Paula Fleishman
From: Steve Tindale / Nilgun Kamp
Date: 6/26/09
Re: Collier County Parks and Recreation Impact Fee — Additional Scenarios
It is our understanding that the Productivity Committee is interested in a calculation that takes
into account that the future park land purchases are likely to take place in the eastern part of
the County. The Committee also wanted to include some of the beach and boat access
value, but not all of it. In response to the request from the Productivity Committee, this
memorandum provides a summary of additional calculations and the resulting impact fees for
four scenarios, based on the assumptions described in the following paragraphs.
Original Analysis: For purposes of providing a comparison, the original analysis
from the Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Update Study completed by Tindale -
Oliver & Associates, Inc. (TOA) is presented in conjunction with the four scenarios
included in this additional analysis. In the original analysis, the following unit costs
were used to determine the land value per acre figures for community and regional
parks:
o $3.5 million per acre for beach land acreage;
o $1.4 million per acre for boat access land value;
o The value for inland acreage varied depending, among other factors, on the
location and size of the park. The range of values used to determine the
cost per acre for regional parks is $50,000 to $550,000 per acre, while the
range of values used to determine the cost per acre for community parks is
$50,000 to $450,000 per acre.
o Resulting weighted average land value was reduced by 5.7 percent to reflect
the property value decrease between 2007 and 2008 as reported by the
Collier County Property Appraiser.
Tindale - Oliver & Associates, Inc. Collier County
June 26, 2009 1 Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Update Study
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 27, 2009
Page 65 of 75
As a reference, Appendix A, Tables A -1 and A -2 of the Parks and Recreation
Impact Fee Update Study presents the speck land values used for each park and
resulting unit cost per acre figures for regional and community parks, respectively.
In the original analysis, the current achieved level of service (LOS) is 0.14 acres of
beach land and 0.07 acres of boat access land per 1,000 residents with a total of
0.21 acres of waterfront land per 1,000 residents. The County's population
projections that were published in June 2008 indicate an annual population
increase of 10,000 to 13,000 residents over the next five years. These figures
suggest that to keep the current LOS, the County would need to buy approximately
2 to 3 acres of waterfront acreage, which could be funded with impact fees, since
the fee levels are based on the current LOS. This assumes that the combination of
inventory assets remain the same. In addition, approximately 20 percent of the
regional park cost is funded with non - impact fee revenues. To the extent that these
non - impact fee revenues were spent on the purchase of beach and boat access
land, impact fee revenues are likely to be sufficient to purchase less than 2 to 3
acres.
It should be noted that this analysis does not take into consideration the fact that
currently all parks impact fee revenues are being used to pay the debt service.
Rather, it is included to provide an order -of- magnitude in terms of number of acres
possible to purchase, assuming that the impact fee revenues were available for
new assets.
Scenario 1: It is assumed-that all future inland park land purchases will be
completed in the eastern part of the County. As such, inland acreage values are
capped at $230,000 per acre based on the value of land in the Golden Gate area.
Under this scenario, if the inland values were lower than $230,000 per acre for any
given park, they were not increased. In addition, the value of beach and boat
access land was not changed. The resulting fees from these assumptions represent
approximately a 7- percent discount from the calculated fees at 100 percent (12
percent discount for community parks and 4 percent discount for regional parks).
Since the value of beach and boat access land remains unchanged, the estimated
number of waterfront acres the County will able to purchase with impact fee revenue
each year remains the same as the original analysis.
Scenario 2: Under this scenario, in addition to inland park acreage, beach and boat
access land value is also capped at $230,000 per acre. The resulting fees from
these assumptions represent approximately a 45- percent discount from the
calculated fees at 100 percent (12 percent discount for community parks and 60
percent discount for regional parks). Under this scenario, the total capped value of
waterfront properties amount to approximately 8 percent of the value included in the
original study. As such, it is estimated that the County will able to purchase up to
Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc. Collier County
June 26, 2009 2 Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Update Study
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 27, 2009
Page 66 of 75
0.16 to 0.24 acres of beach land and /or boat access land with impact fee revenue
each year.
Scenario 3: Fifty percent of beach and boat access land value is based on actual
market values and the remaining 50 percent is capped at $230,000. The resulting
fees from these assumptions represent approximately a 25- percent discount from
the calculated fees at 100 percent (12 percent discount for community parks and 32
percent discount for regional parks). Under this scenario, the total capped value of
waterfront properties amount to approximately 54 percent of the value included in
the original study. As such, it is estimated that the County will able to purchase 1.1
acres to 1.6 acres of beach land and /or boat access land with impact fee revenue
each year.
Scenario 4: Seventy five percent of beach and boat access land value is based on
actual market values and the remaining 25 percent is capped at $230,000. The
resulting fees from these assumptions represent approximately a 15- percent
discount from the calculated fees at 100 percent (12 percent discount for community
parks and 18 percent discount for regional parks). Under this scenario, the total
capped value of waterfront properties amount to approximately 77 percent of the
value included in the original study. As such, it is estimated that the County will able
to purchase 1.5 acres to 2.3 acres of beach land and /or boat access land with
impact fee revenue each year.
Table 1 presents the net cost per person for the original analysis and Tables 2 thru 5 present
the resulting net cost per person for each of the four scenarios.
Tables 6 through 8 present the resulting impact fees and a comparison to the calculated fees
from the original analysis at 100 percent and to the current fees for each of the four scenarios
included in this additional analysis.
We hope this information is helpful. Please let us know if you have any questions or need
further information.
Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc. Collier County
June 26, 2009 3 Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Update Study
I
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 27, 2009
Page 67 of 75
Table 1
Net Cost per Person
Original Analysis
rk I .
s;'cn: ^ -Park T
trcr oot►nt. K
;_'
L
�: „ Cc►p1mu ,� ,
e Cost erAcre'
pat ".
$200,000
Site Preparation, and Irrigation Costs ( er acre
$440,000
Total Land Cost per Acre t $10,000
$40,000
Facilit &Equipment Cost per Acre $210,ODD
;480,000
Total Land &Facility Cost per Acre $214,680
$26,766
$424,680
Parks LOS (acres per 1,000 Residents )
$506,766
1.04
Parks and Recreation Total Cost per Resident( I
5441.67
2.15
$214,680
$1,089.55
(1) Calculated based on the land values shown in Tables A -1 and A -2 in the Collier County Parks and
Recreab'on Impact Fee Update Study Drab Report.
$374,680
(2) Source: Collier County Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Update Study Draft Report
Parks LOS (acres per 1,000 Residents ) (
(3) Sum of land, landscaping, site preparation, and irrigation costs (items 1 and 2)
2.15
(4) Source: Collier County Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Update Study Draft Report
$389.67
(5) Sum of total land cost and facility and equipment cost per acre (Items 3 and 4)
(6) Source: Collier County Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Update Study Draft Report
(7) Total land and facility cost per acre (Item 5) multiplied by parks LOS (Item 6) and divided by 1,000
Table 2
Net Cost per Person
Scenario
k 1 -,diuwidLm odsea on a cap OT 4)Z 3U,000 per acre for value of inland park acreage. All other values
remained the same as the figures shown in Tables A -1 and A -2 in the Collier County Parks and Recreation
Impact Fee Update Study Draft Report.
(2) Source: Collier County Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Update Study Draft Report
(3) Sum of land, landscaping, site preparation, and irrigation costs (Items 1 and 2)
(4) Source: Collier County Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Update Study Draft Report
(5) Sum of total land cost and facility and equipment cost per acre (Items 3 and 4)
(6) Source: Collier County Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Update Study Draft Report
(7) Total land and facility cost per acre (Item 5) multiplied by parks LOS (Item 6) and divided by 1,000
Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Collier County
June 26, 2009 4 Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Update Study
s;'cn: ^ -Park T
'Y''2.'��
Cu p
.
Land Purchase Cost erAcre('
$150,000
$425,000
Landscaping, Site Preparation, and Irrigation Costs ( er acre
$10,000
$40,000
Total Land Cost per Acre "'
$160,000
$465,000
Facility & Equipment Cost per Acre
$214,680
$26,766
Total Land & Facility Cost per Acre(
$374,680
$491,766
Parks LOS (acres per 1,000 Residents ) (
1.04
2.15
Parks and Recreation Total Cost per Resident I
$389.67
$1,057.30
k 1 -,diuwidLm odsea on a cap OT 4)Z 3U,000 per acre for value of inland park acreage. All other values
remained the same as the figures shown in Tables A -1 and A -2 in the Collier County Parks and Recreation
Impact Fee Update Study Draft Report.
(2) Source: Collier County Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Update Study Draft Report
(3) Sum of land, landscaping, site preparation, and irrigation costs (Items 1 and 2)
(4) Source: Collier County Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Update Study Draft Report
(5) Sum of total land cost and facility and equipment cost per acre (Items 3 and 4)
(6) Source: Collier County Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Update Study Draft Report
(7) Total land and facility cost per acre (Item 5) multiplied by parks LOS (Item 6) and divided by 1,000
Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Collier County
June 26, 2009 4 Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Update Study
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 27, 2009
Page 68 of 75
Table 3
Net Cost per Person
Scenario 2
Park T
Com Q ent
hFacili& hase Cost per Acre ") Commun' R ion a1
n ,Site Preparation, and Irri ation Costs $150,000 $190,000
(per acre (') $10,000 $40,000
d Cost per Acre(31
uipment Cost er A(' $160,000 -230000
d & Facilit Cost a - Acre() $214,680 $26,766
(acres per 1,000 Residents) e) 5374,680 - 256,766
Recreation Total Cost er Resident( 1.04 2.15
- 389.67 $552.05
(1) Calculated based on a cap of $230,000 per acre for value of inland park, beach, and boat access acreage.
All values less than $230,000 per acre remained the same as the figures shown in Tables A -1 and A -2 in
the Collier County Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Update Study Draft Report.
(2) Source: Collier County Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Update Study Draft Report
(3) Sum of land, landscaping, site preparation, and irrigation costs (Items 1 and 2)
(4) Source: Collier County Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Update Study Draft Report
(5) Sum of total land cost and facility and equipment cost per acre (Items 3 and 4)
(6) Source: Collier County Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Update Study Draft Report
(7) Total land and facility cost per acre (Item 5) multiplied by parks LOS (Item 6) and divided by 1,000
Table 4
Net Cost per Person
Scenario 3
-
Park,T e
Gom on "nt
se Cost per Acre(T
Land Purchase
rnmm#inity
$150,000
aloe 1
$305,000
Landscaping, Site Preparation, and Irrigation Costs (per acre)(')
Total Land Cost per Acre 131
Facility & Equipment Cost per Acre('(
$10,000
$160,000
$214,680
$40,000
$345,000
$26,766
Total Land & Facility Cost per Acre((
Parks LOS (acres per 1,000 Residents)()
$374,680
1.04
$371,766
2.15
Parks and Recreation Total Cost per Residentl')
$389.67
$799.30
1 a wN ui D/ou,uuu per acre Tor value of inland park, and 50 percent of the beach and
boat access acreage. All values less than $230,000 per acre remained the same as the figures shown in
Tables A -1 and A -2 in the Collier County Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Update Study Drab` Report.
(2) Source: Collier County Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Update Study Draft Report
(3) Sum of land, landscaping, site preparation, and irrigation costs (Items 1 and 2)
(4) Source: Collier County Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Update Study Draft Report
(5) Sum of total land cost and facility and equipment cost per acre (Items 3 and 4)
(6) Source: Collier County Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Update Study Draft Report
(7) Total land and facility cost per acre (Item 5) multiplied by parks LOS (Item 6) and divided by 1,000
Tind ale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. Collier County
June 26, 2009 5 Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Update Study
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 27, 2009
Page 69 of 75
Table 5
Net Cost per Person
Scenario 4
a
�: 4 _. Park
IV
Land Purchase Cost per Acre(') Communi
Landscaping, Site Preparation, and Irri ation Costs $150,000 $365,00C
Tatal Land Cost per Acre (Per acre) Iz) $10,000 $40,OOC
Faciii 8 Equipment Cost r Acrel $160,000 5405,000
Total Land & Facility Cost er Acre I $214,680 $26,766
Parks LOS acres per 1,000 Residents $374,680 5431,766
Parks and Recreation Total Cost er Residenti'� 1'04 2.15
5389.67 $928.30
(1) Calculated based on a cap of $230,000 per acre for value of inland park, and 75 percent of beach and boat
access acreage. All values less than $230,000 per acre remained the same as the figures shown in Tables
A -1 and A -2 in the Collier County Parks and Recreation Impact Fee update Study Draft Report.
(2) Source: Collier County Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Update Study Draft Report
(3) Sum of land, landscaping, site preparation, and irrigation costs (Items 1 and 2)
(4) Source: Collier County Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Update Study Draft Report
(5) Sum of total land cost and facility and equipment cost per acre (Items 3 and 4)
(6) Source: Collier County Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Update Study Draft Report
(7) Total land and facility cost per acre (Item 5) multiplied by parks LOS (Item 6) and divided by 1,000
Tindale- Oliver & Assodates, Inc Collier County
June 26, 2009 6 Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Update Study
f
H N
O i
a ca
0
U 'c
<oao�
� Ll
c1 O
a
c
O
N
ea
a�
^oa
C
H d .0
LL
V �
CL
E
U
C
N
d
m
O
N
m
0
0
N
(D
N
Q7
C
U�
m
U �
m
N
U
ra
4
E
C
O
m
U
O
a
C
m
CLN
Y
f6
I,-
C
E
0
0 u 'ru
0
L.L
c
0
U)
co E
0
U.
CL
E
L) 0 (n
cL
a?
LL
cL
m
m
0
2
cc,
L3
}%
M
cIt
m
dl
Cl)
xf�/
a)
§7 \\
ƒ\
\�
§ ? f�
-
m
CF� c� ul co
�� /
.$
6—S
«
\� /
��
^
Room
\
�f
V LO
C?
C?
„
�
Cl)
c
0
U)
co E
0
U.
CL
E
L) 0 (n
cL
a?
LL
cL
m
m
0
2
cc,
L3
}%
M
cIt
m
dl
Cl)
a)
co
§ ? f�
-
m
§
Cl)
U')
CO
}\
C?
C'4
co
a)
ED
C�
ci
�\�:
04
z
�f
C*')
co
C-4
0
C) C)
to
Cli
00
C"!
e
C)
40),
cli
CN
E
Q¥¥(
ry
16
CD
E
-6
g
2
E
m
0
-
6
tm
0
C)
C/)
M_0
,
M ,
c
0
U)
co E
0
U.
CL
E
L) 0 (n
cL
a?
LL
cL
m
m
0
2
cc,
L3
}%
M
cIt
m
dl
§
22
E$
��a
�Uk
cc
CL
2
«¥
0%C�
00
%
?m/
„
■
/
\
]
%
} «
aI$f
<
%Gk&
_
2
»�
/
/
f
t
K
/
\)
2�: §<
§ate
\
LCO
�
-�-
�� f
�
7$�a
..a. .
2
§Ca
\
\
2
I--
°
@
0
%
\
\6
<
91
$�
$
� .
«
m
N
m
L
/ I
n
%rw
� t \
\
J°
«` k
¥
#2§
0
k
ƒ
:.
a
.
\
A
/
°
$
k
6
)
\
. < 7
}
3
LL
E
`f�
.
o
4-
ff
\\
\/
\
/
k
j
#
2
k
j
)§
\
§@
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 27, 2009
Page 73 of 75
Exhibit B - Parks Rate Comparisons
Proposed Rates vs. Productivity Committee Recommended Rates
Community Parks
Study -
Proposed
Rate
Productivity
Committee -
Proposed Rate
Dollar
Difference
Percent
Difference
Hotel /Motel
$503.22
$442.83
$60.39
-12%
Mobile Home /RV
945.71
832.22
113.49
-12%
Multi-Family
711.45
626.08
85.37
-12%
Single Family <1,500 s . ft.
1,199.02
1,055.14
(143.88 )
-12%
,Single Family 1,500 - 2,499 s . ft.
1,315.89
1,157.98
157.91)
-12%
ISingle Family > 2,500 s . ft.
1,445.75
1,272.26
(173.49)
-12%
Regional Parks
Study -
Proposed
Rate
Productivity
Committee -
Proposed Rate
Dollar
Difference
Percent
Difference
Hotel /Motel
$1,038.61
$851.66
$186.95)
-18%
Mobile Home /RV
1916.05
1571.16
(344.89 )
-18%
Multi-Family
1298.26
1064.57
233.69)
-18%
Single Family <1,500 s . ft.
2199.69
1803.75
(395.94
-18%
Single Family 1,500 - 2,499 s . ft.
2420.51
1984.82
(435.69 )1
-18%
Single Famil > 2,500 s . ft.
2,666.80
2186.78
(480.02)1
-18%
Combined
Study -
Proposed
Rate
Productivity
Committee -
Proposed Rate
Dollar
Difference
Percent
Difference
Hotel /Motel
$1,541.83
$1,294.49
($247.34)
-16%
Mobile Home /RV
2,861.76
2,403.38
(45&38)l
-16%
Multi-Family
2,009.71
1,690.65
319.06)
-16%
Single Family <1,500 s . ft.
3,398.71
2,858.89
(539.82)
-16%
Single Family 1,500 - 2,499 sq. ft.
3,736.40
3,142.80
(59160)
-16%
Single Family > 2,500 s . ft.
4,112.55
3,459.04
653.51)
-16%
CDES
10/8/2009
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 27, 2009
Page 74 of 75
Exhibit C - Parks Rate Comparisons
Current Rates vs. Productivity Committee Recommended Rates
This chart provides the overall effect of the Productivity Committee Recommendation on the current
rate structure.
Community Parks
Current
Rate
Productivity
Committee -
Proposed Rate
Dollar
Difference
Percent
Difference
Hotel /Motel
$578.45
$442.83
$135.62
-23%
Mobile Home /RV
1,062.60
832.22
(230.38 )
-22%
Multi-Family
862.50
626.08
(236.42 )
-27%
Single Family <1,500 s . ft.
1,075.25
1,055.14
(20.11 )
-2%
.Single Family 1,500 - 2,499 s . ft.
1,181.05
1,157.98
(23.07 )
-2%
Single Family > 2,500 s . ft.
1,286.85
1,272.26
14.59
-1%
Regional Parks
Current
Rate
Productivity
Committee -
Proposed Rate
Dollar
Difference
Percent
Difference
Hotel /Motel
$1,279.95
$851.66
($428.29)
-33%
Mobile Home /RV
2351.75
1571.16
(780.59)
-33%
Multi-Family
1907.85
1064.57
(843.28)
-44%
Single Family <1,500 sq. ft.
2378.2
1803.75
574.45)
-24%
Single Family 1,500 - 2,499 s . ft.
2612.8
1984.82
(627.98)
-24%
Single Family > 2,500 s . ft.
2,847.40
2186.78
660.62)
-23%
Combined
Current
Rate
Productivity
Committee -
Proposed Rate
Dollar
Difference
Percent
Difference
Hotel /Motel
$1,858.40
$1,294.49
($563.91)
-30%
Mobile Home /RV
3,414.35
2,403.38
(1.010.97 )
-30%
Multi-Family
2,770.35
1,690.65
(1,079.70)
-39%
Single Family <1,500 s . ft.
31453.45
2,858.89
594.56
-17%
Single Family 1,500 - 2,499 s . ft.
3,793.85
3,142.80
(651,05),
-17%
Single Family > 2,500 s . ft.
4,134.25
3,459.04
(675.21)
-16%
CDES
10/8/2009
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 27, 2009
Page 75 of 75
16D. • Friday, October 16, 2009 • Naples Daily News
NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER ORDINANCE
Notice is hereby given that on Tuesday, October 27, 2009, in the Boardroom, 3rd
Floor, Administration Building, Collier County Government Center, 3301 East Ta-
miaml Trail, Naples, Florida, the Board of County Commissioners will consider
the enactment of a County Ordinance. The meeting will commence at 9:00 A.M.
The title of the proposed Ordinance is as follows:
. a
AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OP 'COLLIER COUN-
TY, FLORIDA, AMENDING CHAPTER 74 OF THE COLLIER COUNTY CODE OF LAWS
AND ;,ORDINANCES, THAT ORDINANCE BEING THE COLLIER COUNTY CONSOLI-
DATED IMPACT FEE ORDINANCE AS AMENDED, PROVIDING FOR THE INCORPORA-
PARKS AND RECREATION' IMPACT FECUPOATE' STUDY '; AMENDING THE PARKS
AND RECREATION IMPACT FEE RATE SCHEDULE, WHICH IS SCHEDULE THREE OF
APPENDIX A, AS SET FORTH IN THE IMPACT FEE. UPDATE STUDY; PROVIDING FOR
CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FO_{, INCLUSION IN THE CODE OF LAWS
AND ORDINANCES,. '.
ANDPROVIDING FOR AN `EFFECTIVE OATS OF NOVEMBER 1;
2009, FOR THE REGIONAL PARKS IMPACT FEE RATE SCHEDULE AND FEBRUARY 1,
2010, FOR THE COMMUNITY PARKS IMPACT FEE RATE SCHEDULE
Copies of the proposed Ordinance are on file with the Clerk to the Board and are
available for inspection. All interested parties are invited to attend and be
heard.
NOTE: All persons wishing to speak on, any agenda item must register with the
County administrator prior to presentation of the agenda item to be addressed.
Individual speakers will be-limited to 5 minutes on any item. The selection of an
individual.to speak on behalf of an organization or group is encouraged. If rec-
ognized by the Chairman, a spokesperson for a group or organization may be al-
lotted 10 minutes to speak on an Item.
Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in. the Board
agenda packets must submit said material a minimum of 3 weeks prior to the
respective public hearing In any case, written materials intended to be consid-
ered by the Board shall be submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum
of seven days prior to the public hearing. All material used in presentations be-
fore the Board will become a permanent part of the record,
Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the Board will need a record of
the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a
verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimo-
ny and evidence upon which the appeal is based.
If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to
participate in this proceeding; you are entitled, at no cost to you, to .the provi-
sion of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Manage-
ment Department, located at 3301 Tamiami Trail East, Building W, Naples, Florida
34112, (239) 252 -8380. Assisted listening devices for the hearing Impaired. are
available in the County Commissioners' Office.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
DONNA FIALA, CHAIRMAN
DWIGHT E. BROCK. CLERK
By: Martha Vergara, Deputy Clerk
(SEAL)
October 16. 2009 NoIS20925