Loading...
HEX Agenda 06/27/2019 COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER HEARINGS BACKUP DOCUMENTS JUNE 27, 2019 AGENDA THE COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER WILL HOLD A HEARING AT 9:00 AM ON THURSDAY, JUNE 27, 2019 IN CONFERENCE ROOM 610 AT THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT/PLANNING & REGULATION BUILDING, 2800 N. HORSESHOE DRIVE, NAPLES, FLORIDA INDIVIDUAL SPEAKERS WILL BE LIMITED TO 5 MINUTES UNLESS OTHERWISE WAIVED BY THE HEARING EXAMINER. PERSONS WISHING TO HAVE WRITTEN OR GRAPHIC MATERIALS INCLUDED IN THE HEARING REPORT PACKETS MUST HAVE THAT MATERIAL SUBMITTED TO COUNTY STAFF 10 DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING. ALL MATERIALS USED DURING PRESENTATION AT THE HEARING WILL BECOME A PERMANENT PART OF THE RECORD. ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THE HEARING EXAMINER WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING THERETO, AND THEREFORE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. DECISIONS OF THE HEARING EXAMINER ARE FINAL UNLESS APPEALED TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS. HEARING PROCEDURES WILL PROVIDE FOR PRESENTATION BY THE APPLICANT, PRESENTATION BY STAFF, PUBLIC COMMENT AND APPLICANT REBUTTAL. THE HEARING EXAMINER WILL RENDER A DECISION WITHIN 30 DAYS. PERSONS WISHING TO RECEIVE A COPY OF THE DECISION BY MAIL MAY SUPPLY COUNTY STAFF WITH THEIR NAME, ADDRESS, AND A STAMPED, SELF-ADDRESSED ENVELOPE FOR THAT PURPOSE. PERSONS WISHING TO RECEIVE AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF THE DECISION MAY SUPPLY THEIR EMAIL ADDRESS. 1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. REVIEW OF AGENDA 3. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS: NOTE: This item has been continued from the April 25, 2019 HEX Meeting and the May 23, 2019 HEX Meeting. A. PETITION NO. BD-PL20180001843 – Godfrey and Patricia Turner request a 57.5-foot boat dock extension over the maximum 20 feet allowed by Section 5.03.06 of the Land Development Code, for a total protrusion of 77.5 feet, for a boat dock facility with one boat slip and a kayak platform located at 26 Dolphin Circle, on the west side of Dolphin Circle, north of Pelican Street West, in Section 31, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: James Sabo, AICP, Principal Planner] B. PETITION NO. CU-PL20180003543 – Keenan Development Group, Inc. requests a Conditional Use to allow educational services (SIC 8221 and 8222) within a Commercial Intermediate (C-3) zoning district pursuant to Section 2.03.03 C.1.c.8 of the Collier County Land Development Code for a project to be known as Keiser University, for a 5.8± acre property located on the north side of U.S. 41 East, approximately 450 feet west of Lakewood Boulevard, in Section 13, Township 50 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: Tim Finn, AICP, Principal Planner] C. PETITION NO. PL20190000097 - Toll Bros., Inc. requests an insubstantial change to Ordinance No. 17-02, as amended, the Hamilton Place RPUD, to add development standards for townhouses, and to reduce the minimum lot area for the amenity center. The subject PUD property consists of 9.75± acres, located east of Livingston Road and South of Pine Ridge Road in Section 18, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: Tim Finn, AICP, Principal Planner] D. PETITION NO. PDI-PL20180002894 – Monterey Master Owners’ Association, Inc. requests an insubstantial change to Ordinance Number 85-25, as amended, the Monterey Planned Unit Development, to add minimum accessory structure setback standards to Section V, Buffers, Parks, Greenbelts, Etc., “P” and Lakes “L”, for a playground shade structure and tennis courts in Tract P located in the southwest portion of the PUD. The subject PUD property is located on the north side of Orange Blossom Drive, approximately one quarter mile east of Goodlette-Frank Road, in Section 2, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 193± acres. [Coordinator: John Kelly, Senior Planner] 4. OTHER BUSINESS 5. PUBLIC COMMENTS 6. ADJOURN AGENDA ITEM 3-A This item was continued from the April 25, 2019 HEX meeting and the May 23, 2019 HEX meeting. The packet materials were submitted at the April 25, 2019 HEX meeting. PETITION NO. BD-PL20180001843 – Godfrey and Patricia Turner request a 57.5-foot boat dock extension over the maximum 20 feet allowed by Section 5.03.06 of the Land Development Code, for a total protrusion of 77.5 feet, for a boat dock facility with one boat slip and a kayak platform l ocated at 26 Dolphin Circle, on the west side of Dolphin Circle, north of Pelican Street West, in Section 31, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: James Sabo, AICP, Principal Planner] KEENAN DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONAL USE  (PL20180003543)      Application and Supporting Documents    June 27, 2019 HEX Hearing              Prepared June 10, 2018 by:        Post Office Box 1550 2122 Johnson Street Fort Myers, Florida 33902-1550 (239) 334-0046 E B 642   – OTHER DOCUMENTATION –    ZONING VERIFICATION LETTER    PRE‐APPLICATION NOTES       APPLICATION     COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 5/08/2018 Page 1 of 12 APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC HEARING FOR: CONDITIONAL USE LDC Section 10.08.00 & Code of Laws section 2-83 – 2-90 Chapter 3 C.1 of the Administrative Code PETITION NO (PL) PROJECT NAME DATE PROCESSED A CONDITIONAL USE TO BE HEARD BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS A MINOR CONDITIONAL USE TO BE HEARD BY THE OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Name of Property Owner(s): ______________________________________________________ Name of Applicant if different than owner: __________________________________________ Address: ____________________________City: _____________ State: ________ ZIP: _______ Telephone: ____________________ Cell: ____________________ Fax: ___________________ E-Mail Address: ________________________________________________________________ Name of Agent(s): _____________________________________________________________ Firm: _________________________________________________________________________ Address: ____________________________City: _____________ State: ________ ZIP: _______ Telephone: ____________________ Cell: _____________________ Fax: __________________ E-Mail Address: ________________________________________________________________ BE AWARE THAT COLLIER COUNTY HAS LOBBYIST REGULATIONS. GUIDE YOURSELF ACCORDINGLY AND ENSURE THAT YOU ARE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THESE REGULATIONS. To be completed by staff COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 5/08/2018 Page 2 of 12 ASSOCIATIONS Required: List all registered Home Owner Association(s) that could be affected by this petition. Provide additional sheets if necessary. Information can be found on the Board of County Commissioner’s website at http://www.colliergov.net/Index.aspx?page=774. Name of Homeowner Association: _________________________________________________ Mailing Address: ____________________________ City: _________ State: ______ ZIP: ______ Name of Homeowner Association: _________________________________________________ Mailing Address: ____________________________ City: _________ State: ______ ZIP: ______ Name of Homeowner Association: _________________________________________________ Mailing Address: ____________________________ City: _________ State: ______ ZIP: ______ Name of Homeowner Association: _________________________________________________ Mailing Address: ____________________________ City: _________ State: ______ ZIP: ______ Name of Homeowner Association: _________________________________________________ Mailing Address: ____________________________ City: _________ State: ______ ZIP: ______ PROPERTY INFORMATION On separate page, provide a detailed legal description of the property covered by the application: • If the request involves changes to more than one zoning district, the applicant shall include separate legal description for property involved in each district; • The applicant shall submit 4 copies of a recent survey (completed within the last six months, maximum 1" to 400' scale), if required to do so at the pre-application meeting; and • The applicant is responsible for supplying the correct legal description. If questions arise concerning the legal description, an engineer's certification or sealed survey may be required. Property I.D. Number: ____________________________ Plat Book: _______ Page #: _______ Section/Township/Range: _______ /_______ /_______ Subdivision: __________________________________________Lot: ________ Block: ________ Metes & Bounds Description: _____________________________________________________ Size of Property: _____ft. X ______ ft. = _______ Total Sq. Ft. Acres: _____________ Address/ General Location of Subject Property: ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 5/08/2018 Page 3 of 12 ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE Zoning Land Use N S E W If the owner of the subject property owns contiguous property please provide a detailed legal description of the entire contiguous property: (If space is inadequate, attach on a separate page) Section/Township/Range: / / Lot: Block: Subdivision: __________________________________________ Plat Book: Page #: Property I.D. Number: ____________________________ Metes & Bounds Description: ________________________________________________ CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST DETAIL Type of Conditional Use: This application is requesting a conditional use as allowed, pursuant to LDC section 2.03.00, of the _______________________ zoning district for _______________________ (type of use). Present Use of the Property: __________________________________________ COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 5/08/2018 Page 4 of 12 EVALUATION CRITERIA Pursuant to LDC section 10.08.00 and Chapter 3 C.1 of the Administrative Code, staff’s recommendation to the reviewing body shall be based upon a finding that the granting of the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and that the specific requirements governing the individual conditional use, if any, have been met. Further, satisfactory provision and arrangement have been made concerning the following matters, where applicable. On a separate page, provide a narrative statement describing a request for a conditional use and a detailed response to the criteria listed below. Specify how and why the request is consistent with each of the criteria. a. Describe how the project is consistent with the Collier County Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan. Include information on how the request is consistent with the applicable section or portions of the Future Land Use Element. b. Describe the existing or planned means of ingress and egress to the property and proposed structure thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe. c. Describe the effect the conditional use will have on neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic impact, and odor. d. Describe the site’s and the proposed use’s compatibility with adjacent properties and o ther properties in the district. e. Please provide any additional information which you may feel is relevant to this request. Deed Restrictions: The County is legally precluded from enforcing deed restrictions; however, many communities have adopted such restrictions. You may wish to contact the civic or property owners association in the area for which this use is being requested in order to ascertain whether or not the request is affected by existing deed restrictions. Previous land use petitions on the subject property: To your knowledge, has a public hearing been held on this property within the last year? If so, what was the nature of that hearing? _____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ Official Interpretations or Zoning Verifications: To your knowledge, has there been an official interpretation or zoning verification rendered on this property within the last year? No Yes (If yes please provide copies.) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 5/08/2018 Page 5 of 12 STATEMENT OF UTILITY PROVISIONS FOR CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST APPLICANT INFORMATION Name of Applicant(s): ___________________________________________________________ Address: ______________________________City: ___________ State: ________ ZIP: _______ Telephone: ____________________ Cell: _____________________ Fax: __________________ E-Mail Address: ________________________________________________________________ Address of Subject Property (If available): ___________________________________________ City: ________________ State: __________ ZIP: ___________ LEGAL DESCRIPTION Section/Township/Range: / / Lot: Block: Subdivision: _______________________________________________ Plat Book: Page #: Property I.D. Number: _________________________________ Metes & Bounds Description: _____________________________________________________ TYPE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL TO BE PROVIDED Check applicable system: a. County Utility System b. City Utility System c. Franchised Utility System Provide Name: ____________________ d. Package Treatment Plant (GPD Capacity): ___________________ e. Septic System TYPE OF WATER SERVICE TO BE PROVIDED a. County Utility System b. City Utility System c. Franchised Utility System PROVIDE NAME_______________ d. Private System (Well) Total Population to be served: ____________________________________________________ Peak and Average Daily Demands: A. Water-Peak: _______ Average Daily: ________ B. Sewer-Peak: _______ Average Daily: ________ COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 5/08/2018 Page 6 of 12 If proposing to be connected to Collier County Regional Water System, please provide the date service is expected to be required: ____________________________________________ Narrative statement: Provide a brief and concise narrative statement and schematic drawing of sewage treatment process to be used as well as a specific statement regarding the method of affluent and sludge disposal. If percolation ponds are to be used, then percolation data and soil involved shall be provided from tests prepared and certified by a professional engineer. ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ County Utility Dedication Statement: If the project is located within the service boundaries of Collier County’s utility service system, a notarized statement shall be provided agreeing to dedicate the water distribution and sewage collection facilities within the project area to the Collier County Utilities. This shall occur upon completion of the construction of these facilities in accordance with all applicable County ordinances in effect at that time. This statement shall also include an agreement that the applicable system development charges and connection fees will be paid to the County Utilities Division prior to the issuance of building permits by the County. If applicable, the statement shall contain an agreement to dedicate the appropriate utility easements for serving the water and sewer systems. ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ Statement of Availability Capacity from other Providers: Unless waived or otherwise provided for at the pre-application meeting, if the project is to receive sewer or potable water services from any provider other than the County, a statement from that provider indicating adequate capacity to serve the project shall be provided. COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 5/08/2018 Page 7 of 12 RECORDING OF DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS Within 30 days of adoption of the Ordinance, the owner or developer at their expense shall record in the Public Records of Collier County a Memorandum of Understanding of Developer Commitments or Notice of Developer Commitments that contains the legal description of the property that is the subject of the land use petition and contains each and every commitment of the owner or developer specified in the Ordinance. The Memorandum or Notice shall be in form acceptable to the County and shall comply with the recording requirements of F.S. §695. A recorded copy of the Memorandum or Notice shall be provided to the assigned Principal Planner, Zoning Services Department, within 15 days of recording of said Memorandum or Notice. Chapter 8 of the Administrative Code requires that the applicant must remove their public hearing advertising sign(s) after final action is taken by the Board of County Commissioners. Based on the Board's final action on this item, please remove all public hearing advertising sign(s) immediately. COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 5/08/2018 Page 8 of 12 Pre-Application Meeting and Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: A Conditional Use to be heard by the Planning Commission and Board of Zoning Appeals A Minor Conditional Use to be heard by the Office of the Hearing Examiner Chapter 3 C.1. of the Administrative Code The following Submittal Requirement Checklist is to be utilized during the Pre-Application Meeting, and at time of application submittal. At time of submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with the application packet. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. Requirements for Review # Of Copies Required Not Required Completed Application (download current form from County website) 1 Cover letter briefly explaining the project 1 Pre-Application Notes 1 Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized 1 Completed Addressing Checklist 1 Property Ownership Disclosure Form 1 Warranty Deed(s) 1 Boundary Survey 1 Conceptual Site Plan 24” X 36” plus (one 8 ½ X 11 copy) Plans showing proposed location for utilities, if required Plans for screening and buffering the use with reference as to type, dimensions, and character, if required Plans showing the proposed landscaping and provisions for trees protected by County regulations, if required Plans showing the proposed signs and lighting, including type, dimensions, and character, if required Architectural Rendering of Proposed Structure(s), if applicable 1 Current aerial photographs (available from Property Appraiser) with project boundary and, if vegetated, FLUCFCS Codes with legend included on aerial. 1 Statement of utility provisions (with all required attachments & sketches) 1 Environmental Data Requirements, pursuant to LDC section 3.08.00 1 Environmental Data Requirements collated into a single Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) at time of public hearings. Coordinate with project planner at time of public hearing. Listed Species Survey; less than 12 months old. Include copies of previous surveys. 1 Traffic Impact Study (TIS) or waiver 1 Historical and Archeological Survey, or waiver 1 Electronic copy of all documents and plans * Please advise: The Office of the Hearing Examiner requires all materials to be submitted electronically in PDF format. 1 * If located in the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Area, include an additional set of each submittal requirement COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 5/08/2018 Page 9 of 12 ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS: • Following the completion of the review process by County review staff, the applicant shall submit all materials electronically to the designated project manager. • Please contact the project manager to confirm the number of additional copies required. Planners: Indicate if the petition needs to be routed to the following additional reviewers: Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment: Executive Director Emergency Management: Dan Summers; and/or EMS: Artie Bay Conservancy of SWFL: Nichole Johnson GMD Graphics City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director Utilities Engineering: Eric Fey Parks and Recreation: Barry Williams Immokalee Water/Sewer District: Other: School District (Residential Components): Amy Lockheart Communication Towers: Mosquito Control Collier County Airport Authority Naples Airport Authority Commercial Mining: Impact Fees COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 5/08/2018 Page 10 of 12 FEE REQUIREMENTS All checks payable to: Board of County Commissioners  Pre-Application Meeting: $500.00 (to be credited towards the application fee if the application is filed within 9 months of pre-application meeting)  Conditional Use Application Fee: $4,000.00 o When filed with Rezone Petition: $1,500.00 o Additional fee for 5th and subsequent reviews: 20% of original fee  Comprehensive Planning Consistency Review: $300.00  Environmental Data Requirements-EIS Packet (submittal determined at pre-application meeting): $2,500.00  Listed or Protected Species survey review fee (when an EIS is not required): $1,000.00  Transportation Fee, if required: o Methodology Review Fee: $500.00 o Minor Study Review Fee: $750.00 o Major Study Review Fee: $1,500.00  Estimated Legal Advertising Fee for the Hearing Examiner or CCPC: $1,125.00  Estimated Legal Advertising Fee for the BZA, if required: $500.00 Fire Code Plans Review Fees are collected at the time of application submission and those fees are set forth by the Authority having jurisdiction. The Land Development Code requires Neighborhood Notification mailers for Applications headed to hearing, and this fee is collected prior to hearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. All checks payable to: Board of County Commissioners. The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Department ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 ____________________________________________ ____________ Agent/Owner Signature Date ____________________________________________ Agent/Owner Name (please print) X X x x x x x x COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 5/08/2018 Page 11 of 12 Public Participation Requirements LDC Section 10.03.06 B. or C. Chapter 8 of the Administrative Code Notice for Minor Conditional Use Petitions Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) Requirements: Applicant must conduct a NIM at least 15 days prior to the Hearing Examiner’s receipt of the staff report and application materials in accordance with the applicable sections of the Administrative Code. The NIM shall be advertised and a mailed written notice shall be given to the property owners in the notification area at least 15 days prior to the NIM meeting. Mailed Notice: Written notice shall be sent to property owners in the notification area at least 15 days before the advertised Hearing Examiner hearing. Newspaper Advertisements: The legal advertisement shall be published at least 15 days before the advertised Hearing Examiner hearing in a newspaper of general circulation. The advertisement shall include at a minimum: • Date, time, and location of the hearing; • Description of the proposed land uses; and • 2 in. x 3 in. map of the project location. Sign: A sign shall be posted at least 15 days before the advertised Hearing Examiner hearing date. Public Hearing for Minor Conditional Use Petitions Hearing Examiner: The Hearing Examiner shall hold at least 1 advertised public hearing. See Chapter 9 of the Administrative Code for the Office of the Hearing Examiner procedures. Notice for Conditional Use Petitions Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) Requirements: Applicant must conduct a NIM at least 15 days prior to the advertised public hearing. The NIM shall be advertised and a mailed written notice shall be given to the property owners in the notification area at least 15 days prior to the NIM meeting. COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 5/08/2018 Page 12 of 12 Mailed Notice: Written notice shall be sent to property owners in the notification area at least 15 days before the advertised public hearing. Newspaper Advertisements: The legal advertisement shall be published at least 15 days before the advertised public hearing in a newspaper of general circulation. The advertisement shall include at a minimum: • Date, time, and location of the hearing; • Description of the proposed land uses; and • 2 in. x 3 in. map of the project location. Sign: A sign shall be posted at least 15 days before the advertised public hearing date. Public Hearing for Conditional Use Petitions Environmental Advisory Committee (EAC): The EAC shall hold at least 1 advertised public hearing, if required. Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC): The CCPC shall hold at least 1 public hearing. Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA): The BZA shall hold at least 1 advertised public hearing. COVER LETTER STATING REQUEST     2350 Stanford Court ■Naples, Florida 34112 (239) 434-0333 ■ Fax (239) 434-9320 SINCE 1946   February 22, 2019    Timothy Finn, Zoning Services  Growth Management Department  2800 North Horseshoe Drive  Naples, FL 34104      Subject: Keiser University   Conditional Use Application  PL20180003543    Dear Mr. Finn:  On behalf of our client, Keenan Development Group, LLC, please find the enclosed Conditional Use  Application for the above referenced project.  The applicant is requesting to construct a 2‐story,  40,000 square foot educational building and a 2‐story 25,000 square foot building that may be  used as an additional educational building or for any commercial uses allowed under the current  C‐3 zoning classification.  The subject property is a 5.84± acre vacant site located at 4001 Tamiami  Trail East in Section 13, Township 50 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida.     The following information is included for review and approval:  1. One (1) check in the amount of $8,575 for the Conditional Use Application fee,  Comprehensive Planning Consistency Review fee, Environmental Data Requirements‐EIS  Packet fee, Transportation Major Study Review and Legal Advertising fees.   2. Conditional Use Application   3. Evaluation Criteria Narrative   4. Property Ownership Disclosure Form and Sunbiz Reports  5. Pre‐Application Meeting Notes  6. Zoning Verification Letter (PL20180003154)  7. Affidavit of Authorization, Signed and Notarized  8. Completed Addressing Checklist  9. Warranty Deed  10. Boundary Survey, signed and sealed  11. Conceptual Site Plan with Proposed Location for Utilities and Buffering  12. Proposed Signage and Lighting  13. Architectural Elevation  14. Current Aerial Photograph with FLUCFCS Codes (included in Environmental Data Report)  15. Statement of Utility Provisions and Utility Provider Service Availability Letters  16. Environmental Data Report  17. Protected Species Survey (included in Environmental Data Report)  18. Traffic Impact Study    We look forward to working with you and appreciate your coordination of this conditional use  application through the review process.  If you have any questions or require further information,  please contact me at (239) 461‐2415.    Sincerely,    Gary Muller, AICP  Principal Planner  Johnson Engineering, Inc.          20181273‐001  REQUEST NARRATIVE   AND  EVALUATION CRITERIA     KEISER UNIVERSITY CONDITIONAL USE EVALUATION CRITERIA NARRATIVE Keiser University Conditional Use Evaluation Criteria Narrative February 2019 Page 1 of 4 Project Description The applicant is requesting conditional use approval to allow a 65,000 square foot facility for Keiser University on a 5.84± acre site located at 4001 Tamiami Trail East, which is on the northeast side of Tamiami Trail East (U.S. 41), approximately 0.9 miles southeast of the intersection with Airport- Pulling Road and 0.7 miles northwest of the intersection with Rattlesnake Hammock Road. The property is an undeveloped infill site that is currently zoned C-3 (Commercial Intensive) and is designated within the Urban Mixed-Use District and Urban Residential Subdistrict on the Collier County Future Land Use Map. The proposed development will consist of a 2-story, 40,000 square foot educational building facing U.S. 41 and a 2-story, 25,000 square foot building on the southerly portion of the site. The southerly structure may be developed as an additional education building for the university or for commercial uses allowed under the current C-3 zoning. Evaluation Criteria Pursuant of LDC Section 10.08.00 and Chapter 3 C.1 of the Administrative Code, the County shall find that the granting of the conditional use will not adversely affect the public and any specific requirements pertaining to the conditional use have been met by the petitioner. Further, that satisfactory provision has been made in addressing the following items: a. Describe how the project is consistent with the Collier County Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan. Include information on how the request is consistent with the applicable section or portions of the Future Land Use Element. Keiser University is considered as an Educational Service facility, classified under SIC #8221 (Colleges, Universities and Professional Schools), which is a conditional use in the C-3 zoning district per Section 2.03.03.C.1.c.7 of the Collier County Land Development Code. The existing C-3 zoning pre-dates the 1989 adoption of the Growth Management Plan and is subject to Policy 5.13 adopted under Objective 5 of the Future Land Use Element. This policy states that properties whose zoning has been determined to comply with the former Commercial under Criteria provision of the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) shall be deemed consistent with the Future Land Use Element. The subject property is among those properties identified on the Future Land Use Map Series (Map FLUE II) as being “consistent by policy”. According to the Growth Management Plan (GMP), the intent of the Urban Mixed-Use District is to accommodate a variety of residential and non-residential land uses. The Urban Residential Subdistrict provides for higher densities and intensities in areas where existing and planned KEISER UNIVERSITY CONDITIONAL USE EVALUATION CRITERIA NARRATIVE Keiser University Conditional Use Evaluation Criteria Narrative February 2019 Page 2 of 4 public facilities are concentrated and there are fewer environmental constraints. The proposed uses are consistent with those uses typically allowed under this future land use designation. The subject property is located within an Urban Designated Area which has the necessary infrastructure and public facilities available to support the proposed development. Potable water and central sewer will be provided by Collier County Utilities. Other existing services and community facilities which are presently available include: Fire Protection: The property is within the Greater Naples Fire District. Station 22 is located at 4375 Bayshore Drive, approximately 1.8 miles away. Police Protection: The property is served by the Collier County Sheriff’s Office. The East Naples Substation is located at 8075 Lely Cultural Parkway approximately 8 miles away. Emergency Medical: The property is served by Collier Emergency Medical Services. Medic Station 22 is located at 4375 Bayshore Drive, approximately 1.8 miles away. Libraries: East Naples Library is located at 8787 Tamiami Trail East, approximately 1.7 miles away. Public Transit: Collier Area Transit (CAT) Routes 13, 17, 18 and 24 run along U.S. 41 in front of the subject property, and the Government Center Transfer station is 0.9 miles away. The subject property’s proximity to existing facilities and services demonstrates that the site is an appropriate location for the proposed development and the request will promote growth to occur in an efficient and effective manner. This indicates compliance with FLUE Policies 5.2, 5.3, and 5.5. The property is an infill site along U.S. 41 that does not contain any environmentally sensitive areas as indicated in the environmental supplement provided with this application. The proposed project will be compatible, with and complementary to, the surrounding land uses as required by FLUE Policy 5.4. The properties to the north, south and west along U.S. 41 are also zoned C-3 and have all been previously developed with commercial uses, and the golf course and residential dwellings to the northeast will be buffered in accordance with the requirements of the Land Development Code. Specific buffering provisions and other design features to further promote compatibility are documented in the response to item d. below. KEISER UNIVERSITY CONDITIONAL USE EVALUATION CRITERIA NARRATIVE Keiser University Conditional Use Evaluation Criteria Narrative February 2019 Page 3 of 4 The proposed development will also be consistent with Policies 7.1, 7.2, 7.3, and 7.4 of the Future Land Use Element. The primary vehicular ingress and egress to the site will be from U.S. 41. Abutting commercial parcels to the north and south were previously developed without any interconnections to the subject property, however, the proposed site plan indicates the location of some potential future interconnections to these properties. The site plan also depicts an internal sidewalk system within the site which provides two pedestrian connections to the existing sidewalk along U.S. 41. Interconnections with the existing developments to the northeast are not feasible given the location of the golf course and residential dwellings which presently exist on these properties. b. Describe the existing or planned means of ingress and egress to the property and proposed structure thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe. Ingress and egress to the site will be provided by a single driveway along U.S. 41. The proposed access point meets current driveway separation standards and a deceleration lane will be provided to facilitate traffic flow for vehicles entering the property. The site plan also depicts locations for potential interconnections to both abutting properties along U.S. 41 should the neighboring properties agree to interconnections in the future. Connection to the property to the north would be particularly beneficial because it would result in access to a signalized intersection. Pedestrian access to both buildings will be provided via an internal sidewalk system which has two connections to the existing sidewalk along U.S. 41. Crosswalks will be provided in the parking lot to further promote pedestrian safety. c. Describe the effect the conditional use will have on neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic impact, and odor. Conditional use approval is requested to allow an educational facility, a use which will not create problems related to noise, glare, odor or adverse economic impacts to neighboring properties. The site plan has been designed to provide adequate buffering and perimeter setbacks to further minimize any other potential impacts to adjoining properties. The proposed development is a less intensive development scenario than what could be developed under the existing C-3 zoning designation. Abutting properties to the north and south are also zoned C-3 and both have been developed with shopping centers which generate considerably more traffic and have greater impact to the road network than what is being proposed. KEISER UNIVERSITY CONDITIONAL USE EVALUATION CRITERIA NARRATIVE Keiser University Conditional Use Evaluation Criteria Narrative February 2019 Page 4 of 4 d. Describe the site’s and the proposed use’s compatibility with adjacent properties and other properties in the district. The site’s and proposed use’s compatibility with adjacent properties is described below. To the north is Naples Town Centre South Shopping Center. The property is zoned C-3 and is developed with a grocery store, movie theater, two restaurants, and several other office, retail and service establishments. The proposed building containing educational services adjacent to Naples Town Centre is compatible with these shopping, dining and service functions. The minimum side yard setback of 15 feet will be exceeded along the shared property line, and a 10-foot wide Type “A” landscape buffer will be provided for buffering between the two sites. To the south is Patriot Square Shopping Center. This property is also zoned C-3 and has been developed with an “L-shaped” retail/office complex that wraps around another C-3 zoned parcel that has been developed with a gas station and convenience store. The proposed building containing educational services or other permitted C-3 uses adjacent to Patriot Square is compatible with the retail and office uses. The minimum side yard setback of 15 feet will be exceeded along the shared property line, and a 10-foot wide Type “A” landscape buffer will provide buffering between the two sites. The subject property abuts two parcels to the northeast - a portion of the Lakewood County Club golf course owned by Glades Country Club Apartments Association and a common area for the Lakewood Villas Condominiums. The golf course is zoned GC (Golf Course and Recreational Use District) and the condos are zoned RMF-6 (Residential Multi-Family-6 District). The proposed development is designed to exceed the minimum 15-foot rear yard setback by providing a 55-foot parking setback and a 125-foot building setback along this property line. The water management areas of the site are placed along the rear of the subject property to promote compatibility by creating a greater separation distance. These larger setback areas also include a 15-foot wide Type “B” landscape buffer, which provides plantings 6 feet in height and 80 percent opaque within one year, and trees spaced no more than 25 feet on center. The western property line fronts on U.S 41. The required 15-foot wide Type ”D” landscape buffer will be provided to provide buffering and screening along the roadway. The minimum front yard building setback of 25 feet will be exceeded. PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DISCLOSURE FORM     COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Created 9/28/2017 Page 1 of 3 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DISCLOSURE FORM This is a required form with all land use petitions, except for Appeals and Zoning Verification Letters. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. Please complete the following, use additional sheets if necessary. a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest: Name and Address % of Ownership b. If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each: Name and Address % of Ownership c. If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest: Name and Address % of Ownership COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Created 9/28/2017 Page 2 of 3 d. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and/or limited partners: Name and Address % of Ownership e. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners: Name and Address % of Ownership Date of Contract: ___________ f. If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or officers, if a corporation, partnership, or trust: Name and Address g. Date subject property acquired _______________ Leased: Term of lease ____________ years /months If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following: COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Created 9/28/2017 Page 3 of 3 Date of option: _________________________ Date option terminates: __________________, or Anticipated closing date: ________________ AFFIRM PROPERTY OWNERSHIP INFORMATION Any petition required to have Property Ownership Disclosure, will not be accepted without this form. Requirements for petition types are located on the associated application form. Any change in ownership whether individually or with a Trustee, Company or other interest-holding party, must be disclosed to Collier County immediately if such change occurs prior to the petition’s final public hearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Department ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 ____________________________________________ ____________ Agent/Owner Signature Date ____________________________________________ Agent/Owner Name (please print) WARRANTY DEED     ADDRESSING CHECKLIST     COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239)252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 ADDRESSING CHECKLIST Please complete the following and email to GMD_Addressing@colliergov.net or fax to the Operations Department at 239-252-5724 or submit in person to the Addressing Department at the above address. Form must be signed by Addressing personnel prior to pre-application meeting, please allow 3 days for processing. Not all items will apply to every project. Items in bold type are required. FOLIO NUMBERS MUST BE PROVIDED. F orms older than 6 months will require additional review and approval by the Addressing Department. PETITION TYPE (Indicate type below, complete a separate Addressing Checklist for each Petition type) BL (Blasting Permit) BD (Boat Dock Extension) Carnival/Circus Permit CU (Conditional Use) EXP (Excavation Permit) FP (Final Plat LLA (Lot Line Adjustment) PNC (Project Name Change) PPL (Plans & Plat Review) PSP (Preliminary Subdivision Plat) PUD Rezone RZ (Standard Rezone) SDP (Site Development Plan) SDPA (SDP Amendment) SDPI (Insubstantial Change to SDP) SIP (Site Im provement Plan) SIPI (Insubstantial Change to SIP) SNR (Street Name Change) SNC (Street Name Change – Unplatted) T DR (Transfer of Development Rights) VA (Variance) VRP (Vegetation Removal Permit) VRSFP (Vegetation Removal & Site Fill Permit) OTHER LEGAL DESCRIPTION of subject property or properties (copy of lengthy description may be attached) FOLIO (Property ID) NUMBER(s) of above (attach to, or associate with, legal description if more than one) STREET ADDRESS or ADDRESSES (as applicable, if already assigned) PROPOSED STREET NAMES (if applicable) SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NUMBER (for existing projects/sites only) 1 SURVEY (copy - needed only for unplatted properties) PROPOSED PROJECT NAME (if applicable) SDP - or AR or PL # LOCATION MAP must be attached showing exact location of project/site in relation to nearest public road right-of-way See attached survey. COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239)252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 Please Return Approved Checklist By: Email Personally picked up Applicant Name: Signature on Addressing Checklist does not constitute Project and/or Street Name approval and is subject to further review by the Operations Department. FOR STAFF USE ONLY Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Approved by: Date: Updated by: Date: IF OLDER THAN 6 MONTHS, FORM MUST BE UPDATED OR NEW FORM SUBMITTED 2 Fax Email/Fax:Phone: Project or development names proposed for, or already appearing in, condominium documents (if application; indicate whether proposed or existing) LAKEWOOD UNIT NO. 1 DATE: PROJECT NO. FILE NO. SCALE: SHEET NUMBERREVISIONSDESCRIPTIONDATE2350 STANFORD COURT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112 PHONE (239) 434-0333 FAX (239) 434-9320 E.B. #642 & L.B. #642 03/22/12 20129003 13-50-25 1"=60' 1 OF 1 DESCRIPTION ____________________________________________________ ____________________________________ BOUNDARY SURVEYPARCEL INSECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EASTCOLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION     NIM INFORMATION  (Affidavit of Compliance, Summary,  Sign‐in Sheets)     Naples Daily News - 03/26/2019 Page : A17 (c) Naples Daily News March 27, 2019 10:03 am (GMT +4:00) Powered by TECNAVIA Copy Reduced to 50% from original to fit letter page +NAPLESNEWS.COM ❚TUESDAY, MARCH 26, 2019 ❚17A NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING ThepublicisinvitedtoattendaneighborhoodmeetingheldbyKeenan Development Group represented by Gary Muller, AICP of Johnson Engineering, Inc. and Richard D. Yovanovich, P.A. of Coleman, Yovanovich, & Koester, P.A. on: Wednesday, April 10, 2019 at 6:00 p.m. at East Naples Community Park 3500 Thomasson Drive, Naples, FL 34112 SubjectProperty: Approximately5.8+/-acreslocatedat4001Tamiami Trail E, in Section 13, Township 50 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. PETITION NO. CU-PL20180003543 – Keenan Development Group, Inc. requests a Conditional Use to allow a private adult educational facility known as Keiser University within a Commercial Intermediate (C-3) zoning district pursuant to Section 2.03.03 C.1.c.8 of the Collier County Land Development Code for a 5.8± acre property located on the north side of U.S. 41 East, just west of Lakewood Boulevard, in Section 13, Township 50 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. WE VALUE YOUR INPUT Business owners, property owners, residents, and visitors are welcome to attend the presentation and discuss the project with the owner and Collier County staff. If you are unable to attend this meeting, but have questions or comments, they can be directed by mail, phone, fax or e-mail by May 10, 2019 to: Gary Muller, AICP Johnson Engineering, Inc. 2350 Stanford Court Naples, FL 34112 Phone: 239-334-0046 – Fax: 239-334-3661 Email: gmuller@johnsoneng.comND-FMN0010914-01 Doyle is actively seeking consignments for upcoming auctions in New York. For a confidential appointment and free estimate, we invite you to contact Collin Albertsson 561-322-6795 DoyleFL@Doyle.com Van Cleef & Arpels, France, Long Gold and Diamond Brooch Necklace/Bracelets Combination. Estimate: $120,000-180,000 We invite you to Auction in NewYork Jewelry, Art &Silver Consignment Day Naples,Wednesday, April 3 DOYLE AUCTIONEERS & APPRAISERS 175 E 87TH ST, NEW YORK, NY 10128 DOYLE.COM FLAL# AB3403 WASHINGTON – Federal prosecu- tors in two states revealed criminal charges Monday against Michael Av- enatti, the high-profile lawyer who battled President Don- ald Trump, accusing him of scheming to ex- tort shoemaker Nike, embezzling money and defrauding a bank. Avenatti was arrest- ed Monday afternoon in New York outside the office of one of Nike’s lawyers. In the Nike case, federal prosecu- tors in New York charged Avenatti with four counts of extortion and con- spiracy for allegedly threatening to re- veal evidence that he claimed would show improper payments to high school basketball players, according to court records filed there. They charged that Avenatti sought $1.5 million for an unnamed client and between $15 million and $25 million for him and an associate to conduct an internal investigation of Nike, accord- ing to the documents. Prosecutors described the effort, which played out largely over the past week, as a “multimillion extortion scheme.” Minutes before he was arrested, Avenatti posted on Twitter that he was about to disclose a “major high school/college basketball scandal.” Federal prosecutors in Los Angeles separately revealed Monday that they had charged Avenatti with embezzling a client’s money to pay his own ex- penses and defrauding a bank by us- ing a fake tax return to obtain loans, a scheme they said had been going on for considerably longer. Avenatti is charged with embez- zling more than $1million from a cli- ent in order to pay his own expenses and debts — as well as those of his cof- fee business and law firm, according to the 197-page complaint. He also is accused of defrauding a bank by using phony tax returns to obtain millions of dollars in loans. Prosecutors outlined an elaborate scheme in which Avenatti sought three loans from a Mississippi bank in 2014 by allegedly inflating his income by $5.2 million and falsely reporting that he paid $2.8 million in federal taxes to the IRS during the two pre- ceding years. At the time he declared the tax payments to the bank, prose- cutors asserted that Avenatti had made no tax payments for those years and owed the IRS about $850,000. Avenatti is the combative Los An- geles lawyer who represented porno- graphic actress Stormy Daniels in a lawsuit over what she said was a bid by Trump during his campaign to pre- vent her from speaking about having sex with him. Federal prosecutors in New York ultimately determined that the payment had been an illegal con- tribution from Trump’s lawyer, Mi- chael Cohen, to the president’s cam- paign, creating one of a handful of criminal investigations centered around Trump and his associates. As his profile rose, Avenatti public- ly flirted with the idea of running for president himself. Daniels, whose real name is Ste- phanie Clifford, said she terminated Avenatti’s services more than a month ago after he dealt with her “extremely dishonestly.” In the Nike case, Avenatti negotiat- ed a $1.6 million settlement for a client but then provided the client a bogus settlement agreement, according to court documents. Prosecutors said Avenatti misappropriated his client’s settlement money and used it to pay expenses for his coffee business, Global Baristas US LLC, which operat- ed Tully’s Coffee stores in California and Washington state, as well as for his own expenses. Avenatti also allegedly defrauded a bank in Mississippi by supplying it false tax returns to obtain three loans totaling $4.1million for his law firm and coffee business in 2014. “A lawyer has a basic duty not to steal from his client,” Los Angeles U.S. Attorney Nick Hanna said. “Mr. Ave- natti is facing serious criminal charges alleging he misappropriated client trust funds for his personal use and he defrauded a bank by submitting pho- ny tax returns in order to obtain mil- lions of dollars in loans.” If convicted on the charges in Los Angeles, Avenatti faces up to 50 years in federal prison, though few defen- dants generally receive the maximum punishment. Neither Avenatti nor Nike immedi- ately replied to requests to comment. After Avenetti’s court appearance on the New York charges, he will be brought to a federal court in Santa Ana, California, to face the California charges. Avenatti charged with extorting Nike Lawyer allegedly sought up to $25 million Bart Jansen and Kevin Johnson USA TODAY Avenatti SANTA FE, N.M. – New Mexico Sena- tor Tom Udall announced Monday he will not seek re-election in 2020 in a move that opens up a secure Democrat- ic seat to competition. The second-term sen- ator and former con- gressman said in a state- ment he is confident he could run a strong cam- paign but preferred to look for new ways to serve the public, without specifying how. The decision marks an end to a 20- year political career on Capitol Hill for Udall, who first was elected to Congress in 1998. Udall’s father was Stewart Udall, who served as Interior Secretary in the 1960s and helped write far-reaching conser- vation legislation. And his uncle was Morris “Mo” Udall, a longtime Arizona congressman and a prominent Demo- cratic 1976 presidential contender. Since 2017, Udall has helped organize resistance in Congress to attempts by the administration of President Donald Trump to roll back development restric- tions on public lands, while defending the regulation of heat-trapping gasses linked to climate change. The 70-year-old Senator from Santa Fe said he’ll dedicate the final two years of his term to fighting climate change, protecting public lands and to trying “to stop the president’s assault on our De- mocracy and our communities.” “The worst thing anyone in public of- fice can do is believe the office belongs to them,” Udall said in a videotaped message. New Mexico’s Udall won’t seek Senate re-election Morgan Lee ASSOCIATED PRESS Udall 2350 Stanford Court ■Naples, Florida 34112 (239) 334-0046 ■ Fax (239) 334-3661 SINCE 1946         March 26, 2019    Re:  Keenan Development Group  Keiser University Conditional Use Application  (PL20180003543)    Dear Property Owner:    Please be advised that Keenan Development Group has submitted a petition to Collier County seeking  Conditional Use approval for the following described property:    Property located on the north side of U.S. 41 East, just west of Lakewood Boulevard   Site address: 4001 Tamiami Trail E, Naples, FL 34112    The petitioner is asking the County to approve this conditional use application to allow a private adult  educational facility known as Keiser University within a Commercial Intermediate (C‐3) zoning district  pursuant to Section 2.03.03 C.1.c.8 of the Collier County Land Development Code for a 5.8± acre property  located on the north side of U.S. 41 East, just west of Lakewood Boulevard, in Section 13, Township  50 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida.     In compliance with the Land Development Code requirements, a Neighborhood Information Meeting will  be held to provide you an opportunity to become fully aware of the intended activity associated with this  Conditional Use application.  The Neighborhood Information Meeting will be held on Wednesday, April 10  at 6:00 p.m. at the East Naples Community Park located at 3500 Thomasson Drive, Naples, FL 34112.      At this meeting the petitioner will make every effort to illustrate the intended activity associated with this  Conditional Use application and to answer any questions.  Should you have questions prior to the meeting,  please contact me.      Sincerely,        Gary Muller, AICP   Principal Planner       JOHNSON ENGINEERING, INC.  Telephone: (239) 334‐0046        Email: gmuller@johnsoneng.com  Keiser University  Neighborhood Information Meeting     Conditional Use Petition No. PL20190003543  Keenan Development Group, Inc.      Date:  Wednesday, April 10, 2019    Time:  6:00 pm    Location: East Naples Community Park, 3500 Thomasson Dr, Naples, FL 34112    Attendees: Attendees representing the applicant included: Rich Yovanovich of Coleman, Yovanovich  and Koester; Bill Keenan and Dale Chynoweth of Keenan Development Group; Lynda  Waterhouse of Keiser University; and Gary Muller, Jared Brown, Amanda Martin and  Ashlynn Super of Johnson Engineering, Inc.    Attendees representing the public and Collier County are provided on the attached sign‐   in sheets.    Meeting Summary:  The meeting started at approximately 6:00 pm. A sign‐in sheet and comment cards  were provided at the table by the front door for members of the public.    Rich Yovanovich introduced himself as the attorney representing the developer and noted that the  meeting was being recorded.  He began by explaining the purpose of the Neighborhood Informational  Meeting and provided a brief overview of the Collier County review process for the conditional use  application.  He introduced Timothy Finn, the Collier County planner reviewing the application, as the  person who should be contacted regarding any questions or concerns.  He explained that the subject  property is zoned C‐3 which is an intermediate commercial zoning district that allows a college or  university as a conditional use.    Mr. Yovanovich then went on to describe the proposed development.  He pointed out the location of the  subject property on the aerial photograph and the abutting commercial uses along U.S. 41.  He explained  the current operations of Keiser University, stating that the existing Naples facility is currently located in  the old Arthrex building and that the nurse anesthetist program would be moving to this new location.   The new school is expected to open by end of next year because the current lease ends this year and  Keiser anticipates that that other programs will also be offered.   Mr. Yovanovich then referred to the exhibit showing the proposed site plan and explained that the first  phase of the project includes a 2 story 40,000sf building.  He stated that the main site access is depicted  on U.S 41 but the plan also includes a potential interconnect to the eastern property.  If the interconnect  is not made, commuters will make a u‐turn at Lakewood Boulevard.  He said that the proposed use will  have less traffic impacts than other C‐3 uses and a TIS will be provided to Collier County address traffic  issues.   He then referred to the exhibits showing proposed front building elevation and renderings to show what  the building will look like once constructed. The front elevation depicts the view from U.S. 41 and the  renderings depict a view of the back of the building from those that live on the golf course.  He stated that  these exhibits were based on the existing Keiser University building on I‐75 in Fort Myers and the front  and the back of the building look very similar.  He explained that if both buildings are built the university  could be expanded to a total 65,000 square feet of floor area.  He also stated that the developer could  still have the flexibility to use the buildings for C‐3 uses.   After the concluding his presentation, Mr. Yovanovich opened up the floor for public input and asked if  there were any specific questions or concerns regarding the project.  The following questions and  comments were provided by the public:   What golf course is nearby?   Applicant representatives responded that the Glades Golf and Country Club was the golf course  located along portions of the rear property line.   What is the white square on the site plan by the back of the property?   Applicant representatives responded it is a water management area and a landscape buffer.   Will there be a fence or trees along the back of the property?   Applicant representatives responded that a landscape buffer, specifically a Type B landscape  buffer will be provided.   Why this location?   Applicant representatives responded that Keenan Development Group has been open for 30 years  and has partnered with Keiser University for 25 years.  Keiser University wanted to expand in  Naples.  Keiser University is currently in the Arthrex building but their lease will expire soon.   Keiser University approached Keenan Development to find a site.  This site in on a main arterial  roadway.  The new location needs to be easy to find and accessible.  This site meets the needs for  Keiser University.  Currently there are 95 students, but the university can grow over time.   An audience member said her view is displayed on the rendering board.  She prefers the Keiser  University view rather than the back of a fast food restaurant or a grocery store.     Another audience member also agreed that Keiser University is a preferred view. She stated that  there are homeless people on the site now.      The meeting concluded at approximately 6:20.     No comment cards were received from the public after the meeting.  2.03.03.C – Commercial Intermediate District (C-3). Commercial Intermediate District (C-3). The purpose and intent of the commercial intermediate district (C-3) is to provide for a wider variety of goods and services intended for areas expected to receive a higher degree of automobile traffic. The type and variety of goods and services are those that provide an opportunity for comparison shopping, have a trade area consisting of several neighborhoods, and are preferably located at the intersection of two-arterial level streets . Most activity centers meet this standard. This district is also intended to allow all of the uses permitted in the C-1 and C-2 zoning districts typically aggregated in planned shopping centers . This district is not intended to permit wholesaling type of uses, or land uses that have associated with them the need for outdoor storage of equipment and merchandise. A mixed-use project containing a residential component is permitted in this district subject to the criteria established herein. The C-3 district is permitted in accordance with the locational criteria for commercial and the goals, objectives, and policies as identified in the future land use element of the Collier County GMP. The maximum density permissible in the C-3 district and the urban mixed use land use designation shall be guided, in part, by the density rating system contained in the future land use element of the Collier County GMP. The maximum density permissible or permitted in the C-3 district shall not exceed the density permissible under the density rating system. 1. The following uses, as identified with a number from the Standard Industrial Classification Manual (1987), or as otherwise provided for within this section are permissible by right, or as accessory or conditional uses within the commercial intermediate district (C-3). Use Current Proposed a. Permitted uses. 1. Accounting (8721). P P 2. Adjustment and collection services (7322). P P 3. Advertising agencies (7311). P P 4. Amusement and recreation services, indoor (7999 martial arts, yoga and gymnastics instruction, gymnastic schools, and recreation involving physical fitness exercise only). P P 5. Animal specialty services, except veterinary (0752, excluding outside kenneling ). P P 6. Apparel and accessory stores (5611—5699) with 5,000 square feet or less of gross floor area in the principal structure . P P 7. Architectural services (8712). P P 8. Auditing (8721). P P 9. Auto and home supply stores (5531) with 5,000 square feet or less of gross floor area in the principal structure . P P 10. Automobile Parking, automobile parking garages and parking structures (7521 — shall not be construed to permit the activity of "tow-in parking lots"). P P 11. Automotive services (7549) except that this shall not be construed to permit the activity of "wrecker service (towing) automobiles, road and towing service." P P 12. Banks, credit unions and trusts (6011—6099). P P 13. Barber shops (7241, except for barber schools). P P 14. Beauty shops (7231, except for beauty schools). P P 15. Bookkeeping services (8721). P P 16. Business associations (8611). P P Use Current Proposed 17. Business consulting services (8748). P P 18. Business credit institutions (6153—6159). P P 19. Business services — miscellaneous (7389, except auctioneering service, automobile recovery, automobile repossession, batik work, bottle exchanges, bronzing, cloth cutting, contractors' disbursement, cosmetic kits, cotton inspection, cotton sampler, directories-telephone, drive-away automobile, exhibits-building, filling pressure containers, field warehousing, fire extinguisher, floats-decoration, folding and refolding, gas systems, bottle labeling, liquidation services, metal slitting and shearing, packaging and labeling, patrol of electric transmission or gas lines, pipeline or powerline inspection, press clipping service, recording studios, repossession service, rug binding, salvaging of damaged merchandise, scrap steel cutting and slitting, shrinking textiles, solvent recovery, sponging textiles, swimming pool cleaning, tape slitting, texture designers, textile folding, tobacco sheeting, window trimming, and yacht brokers). P P 20. Child day care services (8351). P P 21. Churches . P P 22. Civic, social and fraternal associations (8641). P P 23. Commercial art and graphic design (7336). P P 24. Commercial photography (7335). P P 25. Computer and computer software stores (5734) with 5,000 square feet or less of gross floor area in the principal structure . P P 26. Computer programming, data processing and other services (7371—7379). P P 27. Credit reporting services (7323). P P 28. Direct mail advertising services (7331). P P 29. Drycleaning plants (7216, nonindustrial drycleaning only). P P 30. Drug stores (5912). P P 31. Eating places (5812 only) with 6,000 square feet or less in gross floor area in the principal structure . All establishments engaged in the retail sale of alcoholic beverages for on-premise consumption are subject to locational requirements of section 5.05.01. P P 32. Educational plants and public schools subject to LDC section 5.05.14. P P 33. Engineering services (8711). P P 34. Essential services , subject to section 2.01.03. P P 35. Federal and federally-sponsored credit agencies (6111). P P 36. Food stores (groups 5411—5499) with 5,000 square feet or less of gross floor area in the principal structure . P P 37. Funeral services (7261, except crematories). P P 38. Garment pressing, and agents for laundries and drycleaners (7212). P P 39. Gasoline service stations (5541, subject to section 5.05.05). P P 40. General merchandise stores (5331—5399) with 5,000 square feet or less of gross floor area in the principal structure . P P 41. Glass stores (5231) with 5,000 square feet or less of gross floor area in the principal structure . P P Use Current Proposed 42. Group care facilities (category I and II, except for homeless shelters); care units , except for homeless shelters; nursing homes; assisted living facilities pursuant to F.S. § 400.402 and ch. 58A-5 F.A.C.; and continuing care retirement communities pursuant to F.S. § 651 and ch. 4-193 F.A.C.; all subject to section 5.05.04. P P 43. Hardware stores (5251) with 1,800 square feet or less of gross floor area in the principal structure . P P 44. Health services, offices and clinics (8011—8049). P P 45. Home furniture and furnishings stores (5712—5719) with 5,000 square feet or less of gross floor area in the principal structure . P P 46. Home health care services (8082). P P 47. Household appliance stores (5722) with 5,000 square feet or less of gross floor area in the principal structure . P P 48. Insurance carriers, agents and brokers (6311—6399, 6411). P P 49. Labor unions (8631). P P 50. Landscape architects, consulting and planning (0781). P P 51. Laundries and drycleaning, coin operated — self service (7215). P P 52. Laundries, family and commercial (7211). P P 53. Legal services (8111). P P 54. Libraries (8231). P P 55. Loan brokers (6163). P P 56. Management services (8741 and 8742). P P 57. Marinas (4493), subject to section 5.05.02. P P 58. Membership organizations, miscellaneous (8699). P P 59. Mortgage bankers and loan correspondents (6162). P P 60. Museums and art galleries (8412). P P 61. Musical instrument stores (5736) with 5,000 square feet or less of gross floor area in the principal structure . P P 62. Paint stores (5231) with 5,000 square feet or less of gross floor area in the principal structure . P P 63. Personal credit institutions (6141). P P 64. Personal services, miscellaneous (7299 - babysitting bureaus, clothing rental, costume rental, dating service, debt counseling, depilatory salons, diet workshops, dress suit rental, electrolysis, genealogical investigation service, and hair removal only) with 5,000 square feet or less of gross floor area in the principal structure. P P 65. Personnel supply services (7361 and 7363). P P 66. Photocopying and duplicating services (7334). P P 67. Photofinishing laboratories (7384). P P 68. Photographic studios, portrait (7221). P P 69. Physical fitness facilities (7991; 7911, except discotheques). P P Use Current Proposed 70. Political organizations (8651). P P 71. Professional membership organizations (8621). P P 72. Public administration (groups 9111—9199, 9229, 9311, 9411—9451, 9511—9532, 9611—9661). P P 73. Public relations services (8743). P P 74. Radio, television and consumer electronics stores (5731) with 5,000 square feet or less of gross floor area in the principal structure . P P 75. Radio, television and publishers advertising representatives (7313). P P 76. Real Estate (6531—6552). P P 77. Record and prerecorded tape stores (5735) with 5,000 square feet or less of gross floor area in the principal structure . P P 78. Religious organizations (8661). P P 79. Repair services - miscellaneous (7629—7631, 7699 - bicycle repair, binocular repair, camera repair, key duplicating, lawnmower repair, leather goods repair, locksmith shop, picture framing, and pocketbook repair only). P P 80. Retail nurseries, lawn and garden supply stores (5261) with 5,000 square feet or less of gross floor area in the principal structure . P P 81. Retail services - miscellaneous (5921—5963 except pawnshops and building materials, 5992-5999 except auction rooms, awning shops, gravestones, hot tubs, monuments, swimming pools, tombstones and whirlpool baths) with 5,000 square feet or less of gross floor area in the principal structure . P P 82. Secretarial and court reporting services (7338). P P 83. Security and commodity brokers, dealer, exchanges and services (6211—6289). P P 84. Shoe repair shops and shoeshine parlors (7251). P P 85. Social services, individual and family (8322 activity centers, elderly or handicapped only; day care centers, adult and handicapped only). P P 86. Surveying services (8713). P P 87. Tax return preparation services (7291). P P 88. Travel agencies (4724, no other transportation services). P P 89. United State Postal Service (4311, except major distribution center). P P 90. Veterinary services (0742, excluding outdoor kenneling ). P P 91. Videotape rental (7841) with 5,000 square feet or less of gross floor area in the principal structure . P P 92. Wallpaper stores (5231) with 5,000 square feet or less of gross floor area in the principal structure . P P 93. Any use which was permissible under the prior General Retail Commercial (GRC) zoning district, as identified by Zoning Ordinance adopted October 8, 1974, and which was lawfully existing prior to the adoption of this Code. P P 94. Any of the foregoing uses that are subject to a gross floor area limitation shall be permitted by right without the maximum floor area limitation if the use is developed as a component of a shopping center. P P Use Current Proposed 95. Any other commercial use or professional services which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses including those that exclusively serve the administrative as opposed to the operational functions of a business and are associated purely with activities conducted in an office. P P 96. Any other commercial or professional use which is comparable in nature with the (C-1) list of permitted uses and consistent with the purpose and intent statement of the district as determined by the board of zoning appeals pursuant to section 10.08.00. P P 97. An existing lawful structure over 5,000 sq. ft. as of July 14, 2014 may be occupied by any C-3 permitted use with a 5,000 sq. ft. or greater limitation. P P b. Accessory Uses. 1. Uses and structures that are accessory and incidental to the uses permitted as of right in the C-3 district. A A 2. Caretaker's residence, subject to section 5.03.05. A A 3. Outside storage or display of merchandise when specifically permitted for a use, otherwise prohibited, subject to section 4.02.12. A A c. Conditional uses. The following uses are permissible as conditional uses in the commercial intermediate district (C-3), subject to the standards and procedures established in sections 4.02.02 and 10.08.00. 1. Amusements and recreation services, outdoor (7999 - boat rental, miniature golf course, bicycle and moped rental, rental of beach chairs and accessories only). C C 2. Ancillary plants. C C 3. Automotive vehicle dealers (5511, limited to automobile agencies (dealers)-retail and only new vehicles). In addition to the Planning Commission's Findings, its recommendation shall include, but not be limited to, the following considerations for the conditional use request: C C a. Controls on outdoor paging or amplified systems used as part of the daily operations. b. Location of enclosed service areas, with exception for entry/exit doors. c. The number of service bays. d. Operation hours. e. Adequacy of buffer(s) . f. Location of gasoline storage and/or fueling tanks. g. Means of delivery of automobiles. 4. Bowling centers (7933). C C 5. Coin operated amusement devices (7993). C C 6. Courts (9211). C C 7. Drinking places (5813) excluding bottle clubs. All establishments engaged in the retail sale of alcoholic beverages for on- premise consumption are subject to the locational requirements of section 5.05.01. C C 8. Educational services (8221 and 8222). C P Use Current Proposed 9. Fire protection (9224). C C 10. Food stores with greater than 5,000 square feet of gross floor area in the principal structure (groups 5411—5499). C C 11. Health services (8071, 8092, and 8099). C C 12. Homeless shelters. C C 13. Hospitals (groups 8062—8069). C C 14. Legal counsel and prosecution (9222). C C 15. Medical equipment rental and leasing (7352). C C 16. Membership sports and recreational clubs indoor only (7997). C C 17. Mixed residential and commercial uses, subject to design criteria contained in section 4.02.38 except where superseded by the following criteria: C C i. A site development plan is approved pursuant to section 10.02.03 that is designed to protect the character of the residential uses and neighboring lands; ii. The commercial uses in the development may be limited in hours of operation, size of delivery trucks, and type of equipment; iii. The residential uses are designed so that they are compatible with the commercial uses; iv. Residential dwellings units are located above principal uses; v. Residential and commercial uses do not occupy the same floor of a building ; vi. The number of residential dwellings units shall be controlled by the dimensional standards of the C-3 district, together with the specific requirement that in no instance shall the residential uses exceed 50 percent of the gross floor area of the building or the density permitted under the growth management plan; vii. Building height may not exceed two stories ; viii. Each residential dwelling unit shall contain the following minimum floor areas : efficiency and one-bedroom, 450 square feet; two-bedroom, 650 square feet; three-bedroom, 900 square feet; ix. The residential dwellings units shall be restricted to occupancy by the owners or lessees of the commercial units below; x. A minimum of thirty (30) percent of the mixed use development shall be maintained as open space . The following may be used to satisfy the open space requirements; areas used to satisfy water management requirements; landscaped areas; recreation areas; or setback areas not covered with impervious surface or used for parking (parking lot islands may not be used unless existing native vegetation is maintained); xi. The mixed commercial/residential structure shall be designed to enhance compatibility of the commercial and residential uses through such measures as, but not limited to, minimizing noise associated with commercial uses; directing commercial lighting away from residential units; and separating pedestrian and vehicular accessways and parking areas from residential units, to the greatest extent possible. 18. Motion picture theaters, (7832 - except drive-in). C C 19. Permitted food service (5812, eating places) uses with more than 6,000 square feet of gross floor area in the principal structure . C C Use Current Proposed 20. Permitted personal services, video rental or retail uses (excluding drug stores - 5912) with more than 5,000 square feet of gross floor area in the principal structure . C C 21. Permitted use with less than 700 square feet gross floor area in the principal structure . C C 22. Public order and safety (9229). C C 23. Social services (8322 - other than those permitted, 8331-8399) C C 24. Soup kitchens. C C 25. Theatrical producers and miscellaneous theatrical services (7922 - community theaters only). C C 26. Vocational schools (8243—8299). C C 27. Any other intermediate commercial use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted uses and consistent with the permitted uses and purpose and intent statement of the district, as determined by the board of zoning appeals pursuant to section 10.08.00. C C KEENAN DEVELOPMENT GROUP Keiser University - Naples Campus Collier County, FloridaAERIAL1DATE:PROJECT NO.FILE NO.SCALE:SHEET NUMBERREVISIONS NO. DESCRIPTION DATE JOHNSON ENGINEERING, INC.2350 STANFORD COURTNAPLES, FLORIDA 34112PHONE: (239) 434-0333FAX: (239) 334-3661E.B. #642 & L.B. #642APRIL 201920181273-00113-50-25AS SHOWN RENDERED VIEWS KEISER UNIVERSITY PROJECT # 2018273-001 DATE: APRIL 2019 VIEW 2VIEW 2 NOTE: -Landscape buffer per code requirements depicted at the time of installation. - Palm tree size depicted at maturity. VIEW 1VIEW 1 KEY MAPKEY MAP TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY     TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR KEISER UNIVERSITY - NAPLES CAMPUS CONDITIONAL USE APRIL 2019 Prepared for: KEENAN DEVELOPMENT GROUP 1900 West Commercial Boulevard, Suite 200 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309 Prepared by: 2350 Stanford Court Naples, Florida 34112 (239) 280-4321 EB 642 20181269-000 STATEMENT OF CERTIFICATION I certify that this TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY has been prepared by me or under my immediate supervision and that I have experience and training in the field of Traffic and Transportation Engineering. Joshua J. Hildebrand, P.E. PTOE Florida License No. 73952 Johnson Engineering, Inc. 2122 Johnson Street Fort Myers, Florida 33901 Collaborators: Zachary L. Stone, E.I. Joshua J. Hildebrand, P.E., PTOE Florida License No. 73952 Date - i - TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 1  2.0 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ......................................................................................... 1  3.0 AREA CONDITION .......................................................................................................... 4  3.1 Site Access .............................................................................................................. 4  3.2 Surrounding Roadway Network ............................................................................. 4  3.3 Committed Improvements ...................................................................................... 4  4.0 PROJECTED TRAFFIC ..................................................................................................... 5  4.1 Site Traffic .............................................................................................................. 5  5.0 TRAFFIC DATA COLLECTION ...................................................................................... 7  5.1 Intersection Turning Movement Counts ................................................................. 7  5.2 FDOT Historic Traffic Volumes and Peak Season Correction Factors .................. 7  6.0 TRIP DISTRIBUTION ....................................................................................................... 7  7.0 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ..................................................................................................... 19  7.1 Capacity and Level of Service .............................................................................. 19  7.2 Turn Lane Analysis ............................................................................................... 19  7.3 Intersection Analysis ............................................................................................. 20  8.0 IMPROVEMENT ANALYSIS ........................................................................................ 20  9.0 CONCLUSIONS............................................................................................................... 21  APPENDICES Appendix A Traffic Impact Study Methodology Statement Appendix B Collier County Schedule of Capital Improvements and FDOT 5-Year Work Program Appendix C ITE Trip Generation Appendix D Turning Movement Counts Appendix E FDOT Historical Traffic Counts and PSCF Appendix F Excerpts from Collier County 2018 AUIR Appendix G Collier County Growth Management Plan Transportation Element Appendix H Synchro 10 Intersection Analysis - ii - FIGURES Figure 2-1 Project Location Map Figure 2-2 Area of Influence Map Figure 6-1 Existing A.M. Peak Hour Background Traffic Figure 6-2 Existing P.M. Peak Hour Background Traffic Figure 6-3 A.M. Peak Hour Site Generated Traffic Trip Distribution % Figure 6-4 P.M. Peak Hour Site Generated Traffic Trip Distribution % Figure 6-5 A.M. Peak Hour Site Generated Trips Figure 6-6 P.M. Peak Hour Site Generated Trips Figure 6-7 Seasonally Adjusted Projected 2021 A.M. Peak Hour Background Traffic Figure 6-8 Seasonally Adjusted Projected 2021 P.M. Peak Hour Background Traffic Figure 6-9 Seasonally Adjusted Projected A.M. Peak Hour 2021 Background Traffic Plus Project Traffic Figure 6-10 Seasonally Adjusted Projected P.M. Peak Hour 2021 Background Traffic Plus Project Traffic TABLES Table 4-1 ITE Trip Generation - Based Condition Under C-3 Allowable Uses Table 4-2 ITE Trip Generation - Conditional Use Scenario 1 - Educational Facility Table 4-3 ITE Trip Generation - Conditional Use Scenario 2 - Educational Facility and Commercial Mixed Use Table 6-1 A.M. Peak Hour Trip Assignment Table 6-2 P.M. Peak Hour Trip Assignment Table 7-1 Capacity Analysis Table 7-2 A.M. Peak Hour Intersection Operational Analysis - Future Conditions with Project (2021) Table 7-3 P.M. Peak Hour Intersection Operational Analysis - Future Conditions with Project (2021) KEISER UNIVERSITY - NAPLES CAMPUS TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY APRIL 2019 - 1 - 1.0 INTRODUCTION The purpose of this traffic analysis is to assess the potential transportation impacts associated with the proposed Keiser University in South Naples. The proposed university includes up to 65,000 sf of educational facility, in two separate two-story buildings. An alternate proposal includes 40,000 sf of educational facility and 25,000 sf of commercial uses. The project site is located off U.S. 41 (Tamiami Trail) northbound between Lakewood Boulevard and Palm Drive in Section 13, Township 50, Range 25 East in Collier County. The property is currently zoned C-3 (Commercial Intensive) and is designated within the Urban Mixed-Use District and Urban Residential Subdistrict on the Collier County Future Land Use Map. A methodology statement outlining the parameters of the study is provided in Appendix A. 2.0 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The project includes a 40,000 sf two-story main building and a smaller 25,000 sf of two-story building on a 5.84 acre site. The smaller structure may be developed as an additional education building for the university or for commercial uses allowed under the current C-3 zoning. For the purposes of this study, the more intense land use combination (educational facility/commercial uses) will be analyzed to assess potential transportation impacts. The project study area limits were determined based on the 2%, 2%, 3% rule in accordance with Collier County’s TIS Guidelines and Procedures (Resolution No. 2006-299). As defined by Collier County, the significantly impacted links and intersections are defined as:  Trips distributed on links directly accessed by the project where the project traffic by direction is equal to or exceeds 2% of the peak hour service volume for the adopted LOS standard.  Trips on one link adjacent to the link directly accessed by the project where the project traffic by direction is equal to or greater than 2% the peak hour service volume for the adopted LOS standard.  Trips on all subsequent links where the project traffic by direction is equal to or greater than 3% the peak hour service volume for the adopted LOS standard. Figure 2-1 and Figure 2-2 depict the project location and area of influence as determined by these guidelines. KEISER UNIVERSITY - NAPLES CAMPUS TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY APRIL 2019 - 2 - Figure 2-1: Project Location Map KEISER UNIVERSITY - NAPLES CAMPUS TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY APRIL 2019 - 3 - Figure 2-2: Area of Influence Map KEISER UNIVERSITY - NAPLES CAMPUS TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY APRIL 2019 - 4 - 3.0 AREA CONDITION 3.1 Site Access There is no existing site access. Proposed site access will be located on U.S. 41 on the south-west side of the property. The proposed access point meets current driveway separation standards and a right turn lane will be provided to facilitate traffic flow for vehicles entering the property. Pedestrian access to both buildings will be provided via an internal sidewalk system which will have two connections to the existing sidewalk along U.S. 41. Crosswalks will be provided in the parking lot to further promote pedestrian connectivity. 3.2 Surrounding Roadway Network Tamiami Trail East Located northeast of the project site, Tamiami Trail East is a southeast-northwest six lane divided principal arterial with a 45-mph posted speed limit. Tamiami Trail East runs from Naples across the Everglades where it terminates in Miami. Lakewood Boulevard South of the project site, Lakewood Boulevard is a north-south, two-lane, undivided local road with a 25-mph posted speed limit. Lakewood Boulevard extends from U.S. 41 and terminates at Davis Boulevard to the north. Palm Drive North of the project site Palm Drive is a two-lane divided local road starting at U.S. 41 and terminating at Glades Boulevard to the north. 3.3 Committed Improvements No Collier County of Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) current roadway improvements were identified the general vicinity the project based on the Collier County Schedule of Capital Improvements and FDOT District 1 current 5-Year Work Program (see Appendix B). KEISER UNIVERSITY - NAPLES CAMPUS TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY APRIL 2019 - 5 - 4.0 PROJECTED TRAFFIC 4.1 Site Traffic The present zoning allows for a wide range of commercial uses under the C-3 zoning. The A.M. peak hour, P.M. peak hour, and daily trip generations for the project were estimated using trip generation rates obtained from the ITE Trip Generation (10th Edition) for a base condition of 65,000 sf of shopping center (LUC 820) compared to the two proposed conditional use development scenarios. Scenario 1 assumed 65,000 sf of education facility (LUC 540) and Scenario 2 included 40,000 sf education facility (LUC 540) and 25,000 sf shopping center (LUC 820). The ITE trip generation estimates for the base conditions, Conditional Use Scenario 1 and Conditional Use Scenario 2 are summarized in Table 4-1 through Table 4-3 and included in Appendix C. A pass-by rate of 25% was applied to the shopping center (LUC 820) trip generation rates per the Collier County TIS Guidelines. Table 4-1: ITE Trip Generation - Based Condition Under C-3 Allowable Uses Proposed Building Land Use Code Land Use ITE Rate/Equations(1) Square Feet (sf) A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour Daily In Out Total In Out Total Commercial Retail 820 Shopping Center AM: T= 2.76(X) + 77.28 65,000 139 118 257 207 207 414 4,485 PM: Ln(T) =0.72Ln(X) + 3.02 Daily: Ln(T) = 0.68 Ln(X) + 5.57 Total Pass-By Trips (25%)(2) 35 29 64 52 52 104 1,121 Net New Total Trips 104 89 193 155 155 310 3,364 Footnotes: (1) Obtained from ITE Trip Generation (10th Edition) (2) Pass-by trips to be 25% per the Collier County TIS Guidelines for Shopping Center (LUC 820) Table 4-2: ITE Trip Generation - Conditional Use Scenario 1 - Educational Facility Building Land Use Code Land Use ITE Rate / Equations(1) Square Feet (sf) A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour Daily In Out Total In Out Total Education Facility 540 Junior / Community College AM: 2.35 65,000 90 63 153 71 77 148 1,316 PM: 2.27 Weekday:20.25 Conditional Use Scenario 1 Net New Total Trips 90 63 153 71 77 148 1,361 Footnote: (1) ITE Trip Generation 10th Edition Standard Rates for LUC 540 KEISER UNIVERSITY - NAPLES CAMPUS TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY APRIL 2019 - 6 - Table 4-3: ITE Trip Generation - Conditional Use Scenario 2 - Educational Facility and Commercial Mixed Use Proposed Building Land Use Code Land Use ITE Rate/Equations (1) Square Feet (sf) A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour Daily In Out Total In Out Total Education Facility 540 Junior / Community College AM: 2.35 40,000 55 39 94 44 47 91 810 PM: 2.27 Weekday:20.25 Education Facility Net New Trips 55 39 94 44 47 91 810 Commercial Retail 820 Shopping Center AM: T= 2.76(X) + 77.28 25,000 79 67 146 104 104 208 2,342 PM: Ln(T) =0.72Ln(X) + 3.02 Daily: Ln(T) = 0.68 Ln(X) + 5.57 Pass-By Trip (25%)(2) 20 17 37 26 26 52 586 Commercial Retail Net New Trips 59 50 109 78 78 156 1,756 Conditional Use Scenario 2 Total Trips 134 106 240 148 151 299 3,152 Conditional Use Scenario 2 Total Pass-By Trips 20 17 37 26 26 52 586 Conditional Use Scenario 2 Net New Total Trips 114 89 203 122 125 247 2,566 Footnotes: (1) Obtained from ITE Trip Generation (10th Edition) (2) Pass-by trips to be 25% per the Collier County TIS Guidelines for Shopping Center (LUC 820) Assuming the greater intensity conditional use Scenario 2 is built, which includes 40,000 sf of educational facility and 25,000 sf of shopping center, the project subject to this Conditional Use Application is estimated to generate a net new 203 A.M. peak hour trips, 247 P.M. peak hour trips, and 2,566 daily trips at site build-out. KEISER UNIVERSITY - NAPLES CAMPUS TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY APRIL 2019 - 7 - 5.0 TRAFFIC DATA COLLECTION To establish base traffic conditions and trip distributions, data was obtained from the sources listed herein. Existing roadway volumes as determined by the traffic counts performed by Johnson Engineering. 5.1 Intersection Turning Movement Counts Turning movement counts were recorded on February 5, 2019 and February 6, 2019 from 6:00 A.M. to 8:00 A.M. and from 4:00 P.M. to 6:00 P.M. by Johnson Engineering at the intersections listed below. A summary of the counts is provided in Appendix D.  U.S. 41 (Tamiami Trail) at Guilford Road  U.S. 41 (Tamiami Trail) at Lakewood Boulevard/Highland Drive 5.2 FDOT Historic Traffic Volumes and Peak Season Correction Factors In order to determine base traffic conditions, roadway bi-directional volumes were obtained from FDOT Traffic Online 2017 (see Appendix E) at count station 030094. In order to adjust the collected data to peak season, Peak Season Correction Factors (PSCF) were obtained from the FDOT 2017 Peak Season Factor Category Report (see Appendix E). 6.0 TRIP DISTRIBUTION The project trip distributions were estimated from existing traffic patterns of the surrounding roadway network and logical assumptions based on the educational facility’s proximity to residential areas. Existing traffic patterns were determined from turning movement traffic counts collected by Johnson Engineering staff on February 5, 2019 and February 6, 2019 (see Figure 6-1 and Figure 6- 2) and FDOT historical traffic data from count station 030094. The A.M. peak hour and P.M. peak hour project percent trip distributions are depicted in Figure 6-3 and Figure 6-4. Based on the trip distributions, the project’s A.M. and P.M. peak hour estimated traffic volumes were assigned to the surrounding road network and are shown in Figure 6-5 and Figure 6-6. This analysis is provided for the purpose of assessing the peak hour and peak direction Level of Service (LOS) on the Collier County maintained roadway segments, as identified in Collier County Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR) adjacent to the project site. Results are shown in Table 6-1 and Table 6-2. Excerpts from 2018 Collier County AUIR are provided in Appendix F. Historical traffic data (FDOT count station 030094) was utilized to estimate growth rates for each of the segments to be analyzed in this report. The historical data showed a growth rate of 1.8%, therefore the minimum 2% growth rate was used for growth rate projections. The growth rates were then used to project the background traffic adjacent to the project to the 2021 horizon year. KEISER UNIVERSITY - NAPLES CAMPUS TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY APRIL 2019 - 8 - The A.M. peak hour and P.M. peak hour seasonally adjusted background traffic projected to 2021 can be seen in Figure 6-7 and Figure 6-8. Table 6-1: A.M. Peak Hour Trip Assignment Segment Number Roadway Name From/To (Segment) Trip Distribution (Enter - Exit) AM Peak Project Trips (Enter - Exit) Service Volume(1) % Service Volume (Enter - Exit) 6.0 Airport Pulling Road Davis Boulevard to US 41 (Tamiami Trail) 23% - 23% 26 - 20 2,700 0.96% - 0.74% 91.0 U.S. 41 (Tamiami Trail) Davis Boulevard to Airport Pulling Road 30% - 30% 34 - 27 2,900 1.17% - 0.93% 92.0 U.S. 41 (Tamiami Trail) Airport Road to Rattlesnake Hammock Road 100% - 100% 114 - 89 2,900 3.93% - 3.07% 93.0 U.S. 41 (Tamiami Trail) Rattlesnake Hammock Road to Triangle Boulevard 20% - 20% 23 -18 3,000 0.77% - 0.60% 72.0 Rattlesnake Hammock Road U.S. 41 (Tamiami Trail) to Charlemagne Boulevard 15% - 15% 17 - 13 1,800 0.94% - 0.72% 108.0 Thomasson Drive Bayshore Drive to U.S. 41 (Tamiami Trail) 5% - 5% 6 - 4 800 0.75% - 0.50% Footnote: (1) 2018 Collier County AUIR Table 6-2: P.M. Peak Hour Trip Assignment Segment Number Roadway Name From/To (Segment) Trip Distribution (Enter - Exit) AM Peak Project Trips (Enter - Exit) Service Volume(1) % Service Volume (Enter - Exit) 6.0 Airport Pulling Road Davis Boulevard to US 41 (Tamiami Trail) 18% - 20% 22 - 25 2,700 0.81% - 0.93% 91.0 U.S. 41 (Tamiami Trail) Davis Boulevard to Airport Pulling Road 30% - 30% 37 -38 2,900 1.28% - 1.31% 92.0 U.S. 41 (Tamiami Trail) Airport Road to Rattlesnake Hammock Road 100% - 100% 122 - 125 2,900 4.21% - 4.31% 93.0 U.S. 41 (Tamiami Trail) Rattlesnake Hammock Road to Triangle Boulevard 20% - 20% 24 -25 3,000 0.80% - 0.83% 72.0 Rattlesnake Hammock Road U.S. 41 (Tamiami Trail) to Charlemagne Boulevard 15% - 16% 18 - 20 1,800 1.00% - 1.11% 108.0 Thomasson Drive Bayshore Drive to U.S. 41 (Tamiami Trail) 5% - 3% 6 - 4 800 0.75% - 0.50% Footnote: (1) 2018 Collier County AUIR A.M. peak hour and P.M peak hour project generated trips were added to the background traffic projected to 2021 and seasonally adjusted and are shown in Figure 6-9 and Figure 6-10. This analysis is provided for the purpose of modeling the impacted intersections and determining intersection LOS. KEISER UNIVERSITY - NAPLES CAMPUS TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY APRIL 2019 - 9 - Figure 6-1: Existing A.M. Peak Hour Background Traffic KEISER UNIVERSITY - NAPLES CAMPUS TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY APRIL 2019 - 10 - Figure 6-2: Existing P.M. Peak Hour Background Traffic KEISER UNIVERSITY - NAPLES CAMPUS TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY APRIL 2019 - 11 - Figure 6-3: A.M. Peak Hour Site Generated Traffic Trip Distribution % KEISER UNIVERSITY - NAPLES CAMPUS TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY APRIL 2019 - 12 - Figure 6-4: P.M. Peak Hour Site Generated Traffic Trip Distribution % KEISER UNIVERSITY - NAPLES CAMPUS TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY APRIL 2019 - 13 - Figure 6-5: A.M. Peak Hour Site Generated Trips KEISER UNIVERSITY - NAPLES CAMPUS TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY APRIL 2019 - 14 - Figure 6-6: P.M. Peak Hour Site Generated Trips KEISER UNIVERSITY - NAPLES CAMPUS TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY APRIL 2019 - 15 - Figure 6-7: Seasonally Adjusted Projected 2021 A.M. Peak Hour Background Traffic KEISER UNIVERSITY - NAPLES CAMPUS TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY APRIL 2019 - 16 - Figure 6-8: Seasonally Adjusted Projected 2021 P.M. Peak Hour Background Traffic KEISER UNIVERSITY - NAPLES CAMPUS TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY APRIL 2019 - 17 - Figure 6-9: Seasonally Adjusted Projected A.M. Peak Hour 2021 Background Traffic Plus Project Traffic KEISER UNIVERSITY - NAPLES CAMPUS TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY APRIL 2019 - 18 - Figure 6-10: Seasonally Adjusted Projected P.M. Peak Hour 2021 Background Traffic Plus Project Traffic KEISER UNIVERSITY - NAPLES CAMPUS TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY APRIL 2019 - 19 - 7.0 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS 7.1 Capacity and Level of Service Traffic data from the 2018 Collier County Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR) (see Appendix F) was utilized to estimate the capacity for each of the segments. As provided in Table 7-1 of this report and in accordance with Collier County Concurrency Management rules, future roadway conditions exceed remaining capacity to accommodate the proposed project traffic. Capacity analysis was performed using the Collier County AUIR. Please note that subject property is also located within the South U.S. 41 Transportation Concurrency Exemption Area (TCEA) as indicated in the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan (see Appendix G). Table 7-1: Capacity Analysis Segment Number Roadway Name From/To (Segment) Peak Hour Peak Direction Service Volume (1) 2018 Peak Hour Peak Direction Volume (1) 2018 1/7th Trip Bank (1) 1/7th Trip Bank 2018 Remaining Capacity (1) Site Generated Peak Hour Peak Direction Trips Remaining Trips 92.0 U.S. 41 (Tamiami Trail) Airport Road to Rattlesnake Hammock Road 2,900 2,460 92 67 125 -58 Footnote: (1) 2018 Collier County AUIR 7.2 Turn Lane Analysis Per the Collier County Construction Standards Handbook for Work within the Public Right-of- Way, left turn lanes are required on two lane roads when the peak hour left turning movement is greater than 20 vehicles. Right turn lanes are required on two lane roads when the right turning movement is greater than 40 vehicles during the peak hour. On multilane roads, left turn lanes are required at all median openings and right turn lanes are required at all driveways. Existing access from U.S. 41 (Tamiami Trail) to the project site does not currently exist. Based on the estimated project trips, a northbound right turn lane will be warranted and is recommended at the project entrance. Please note that construction of any improvements on U.S. 41 (Tamiami Trail) will be subject to the minimum requirements specified in the FDOT Design Manual (FDM) and requires FDOT access permitting. Furthermore, and based on the FDOT design standards on U.S. 41 (Tamiami Trail) between Airport Pulling Road and Rattlesnake Hammock Road, a southbound left turn lane to the project site is not recommended due to insufficient length between the proposed site access and the signalized intersection at Guilford Road. Preliminary discussions regarding access to the project were discussed with FDOT at a preapplication meeting held on November 5, 2018. KEISER UNIVERSITY - NAPLES CAMPUS TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY APRIL 2019 - 20 - 7.3 Intersection Analysis Intersection modeling and resulting LOS evaluation was performed using Synchro Studio 10 at the following intersections within the area of study:  U.S. 41 (Tamiami Trail) at Guilford Road  U.S. 41 (Tamiami Trail) at Lakewood Boulevard/Highland Drive The base conditions for the model were determined by projecting the collected background (A.M. and P.M.) traffic to the project build-out year (2021) adjusted to peak season. Two additional traffic models were generated with net new project generated trips (A.M. and P.M.) and committed improvements incorporated into the base models. The primary intent of the traffic models was to estimate 2021 background and background + net new LOS at the intersection for both the A.M. and P.M. peak hours. A summary of the resulting LOS for the intersection is provided in Table 7- 2 and Table 7-3. The Synchro traffic modeling reports are located in Appendix H. Table 7-2: A.M. Peak Hour Intersection Operational Analysis - Future Conditions with Project (2021) Intersection Future Operating Conditions with Project (2021) ICU Capacity Utilization % ICU LOS U.S. 41 (Tamiami Trail) at Guilford Road 67.0% C U.S. 41 (Tamiami Trail) at Lakewood Boulevard / Highland Drive 65.3% C Table 7-3: P.M. Peak Hour Intersection Operational Analysis - Future Conditions with Project (2021) Intersection Future Operating Conditions with Project (2021) ICU Capacity Utilization % ICU LOS U.S. 41 (Tamiami Trail) at Guilford Road 78.6% D U.S. 41 (Tamiami Trail) at Lakewood Boulevard / Highland Drive 72.2% C 8.0 IMPROVEMENT ANALYSIS Based on the 2018 AUIR, U.S. 41 (Tamiami Trail) from Airport Pulling Road to Rattlesnake Hammock Road (segment 92.0) has limited remaining capacity and is projected to exceed capacity in 2020 based on background traffic conditions and recent growth trends. Furthermore, the subject property is also located within the South U.S. 41 Transportation Concurrency Exemption Area (TCEA) as indicated on map TR-4 of the Growth Management Plan. Developments located on properties in this area may be exempt from transportation concurrency requirements if impacts to the transportation system are mitigated using the procedures set forth in Policy 5.5 of the Transportation Element. The proposed development should comply with this policy by providing KEISER UNIVERSITY - NAPLES CAMPUS TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY APRIL 2019 - 21 - certification to Collier County that at least four Transportation Demand Management (TDM) strategies be utilized. As discussed in section 7.2, a right turn lane is warranted and subject to the minimum requirements specified in the FDM. 9.0 CONCLUSIONS The following conclusions are based on the analyses in this traffic study: 1. Assuming the greater intensity conditional use Scenario 2 is built, which includes 40,000 sf of educational facility and 25,000 sf of shopping center, the project subject to this Conditional Use Application is estimated to generate a net new 203 A.M. peak hour trips, 247 P.M. peak hour trips, and 2,566 daily trips at site build-out. 2. The addition of a right turn lane is recommended at the single proposed access location on U.S. 41 (Tamiami Trail) and is subject to the minimum requirements specified in the FDM. Due to the site’s general proximity adjacent to the existing intersections and based on the FDOT design standards on U.S. 41 (Tamiami Trail) between Airport Pulling Road and Rattlesnake Hammock Road, a southbound left turn lane to the project site is not recommended due to insufficient length between the proposed site access and the signalized intersection at Guilford Road. 3. U.S. 41 (Tamiami Trail) has limited remaining capacity and is within the South U.S. 41 TCEA as indicated on map TR-4 of the Growth Management Plan. Developments located on properties in this area may be exempt from transportation concurrency requirements so long as impacts to the transportation system are mitigated using the procedures set forth in Policy 5.5 of the Transportation Element. The proposed development should comply with this policy by providing certification to Collier County that a least four TDM strategies will be utilized. APPENDIX A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY METHODOLOGY STATEMENT APPENDIX A INITIAL MEETING CHECKLIST Suggestion: Use this Appendix as a worksheet to ensure that no important elements are overlooked. Cross out the items that do not apply. Date: January 28, 2019 Time: 11:00 AM Location: 2885 South Horseshoe Drive People Attending: Name, Organization, and Telephone Numbers 1) Michael Sawyer, Collier County Transportation Planning / (239) 252-2926 2) Cecilia Varga, Collier County Growth Management/ (239) 252-2613 3) Chad Sweet, P.E., Collier County Transportation Engineering / (239) 252-5762 4) Jared Brown, P.E., Johnson Engineering, / (239) 434-0333 5) Josh Hildebrand, P.E., PTOE, Johnson Engineering / (239) 873-4039 6) Zachary Stone, E.I. Johnson Engineering / (239) 434-0333 7) 8) 9) Study Preparer: Preparer’s Name and Title: Joshua J. Hildebrand, P.E., PTOE Transportation Engineer / Jared Brown, P.E. Collier County Branch Manager / Zachary Stone, E.I. Engineer Intern Organization: Johnson Engineering, Inc. Address & Telephone Number: 2350 Stanford Court / Naples, FL 34112 / (239) 434-0333 Reviewer(s): Reviewer’s Name & Title: Michael Sawyer, Principle Planner Collier County Transportation Planning Department Reviewer’s Name & Title: Cecilia Varga, Site Plans Reviewer Collier County Growth Management Applicant: Applicant’s Name: Keenan Development Group Address: 1900 West Commercial Blvd, Fort Lauderdale FL Telephone Number: (954) 776-6700 Proposed Development: Name: Keiser University - Naples Campus Location: 00394160009 and 00394200008 Land Use Type: Junior/Community College ITE Code #: 540 Proposed number of development units: 65,000 SF Other: n/a Description: See attached Methodology Statement Zoning Existing: C-3 Comprehensive plan recommendation: n/a Requested: Conditional Use for Education Facility Findings of the Preliminary Study: n/a Study Type: Small Scale TIS Minor TIS Major TIS Study Area: Boundaries: T.B.D. - based on 2%, 2%, 3% rule Additional intersections to be analyzed: T.B.D. Horizon Year(s): Project Build-out is anticipated to be Fall 2020 Analysis Time Period(s): Weekday A.M. and P.M. Peak Hour Future Off-Site Developments: NA Source of Trip Generation Rates: Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) 10th Edition Reductions in Trip Generation Rates: None: N/A Pass-by trips: N/A Internal trips (PUD): N/A Transmit use: N/A Other: N/A Horizon Year Roadway Network Improvements: Base Scenario – No planned improvements identified in the 5 year and 10 year CIP. Methodology & Assumptions: Non-site traffic estimates: AUIR and FDOT Historic Traffic Information Site-trip generation: Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation (10th Edition) (See attached) Trip distribution method: Manual Method Traffic assignment method: Manual Method Traffic growth rate: Determined from Historic Traffic Data provided in AUIR and FDOT Historic Traffic Information Special Features: (from preliminary study or prior experience) Accidents locations: Unknown Sight distance: n/a Queuing: T.B.D Access location & configuration: Access location to meet 245 feet between driveway connections per FDOT Access Management Classification 5 criteria. Right turn lane anticipated to be required Traffic control: Right-in/right-out stop-controlled access Signal system location & progression needs: n/a On-site parking needs: T.B.D. Data Sources: Base maps: Prior study reports: n/a Access policy and jurisdiction: Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Review process: Condition Use Application Requirements: FDOT Driveway Connection Permit Miscellaneous: Project within the South US 41 TCEA. Link ID# 92 expected to be deficient in 2020. =============================================================== SIGNATURES ________________________________ Study Preparer ________________________________ Reviewers ________________________________ Applicant METHODOLOGY STATEMENT FOR KEISER UNIVERSITY NAPLES CAMPUS CONDITIONAL USE JANUARY 2019 Prepared for: Keenan Development Group 1900 West Commercial Boulevard Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309 Prepared by: 2350 Stanford Court Naples, Florida 34112 (239) 434-0333 EB 642 KEISER UNIVERSITY NAPLES CAMPUS METHODOLOGY STATEMENT - 1 - 1.0 INTRODUCTION The purpose of this methodology statement is to assess the potential transportation impacts and Traffic Impact Study (TIS) requirements associated with the addition of a Keiser University on parcels 00394160009 and 00394200008 in Collier County. These parcels are currently zoned C-3 Commercial Intermediate. Keiser University will be approximately 65,000 square feet of Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Land Use Code 540 (Junior/Community College) and is to be located just north of the intersection of Tamiami Trail East and Lakewood Blvd (see Figure 1-1). Figure 1-1: Project Location Map 2.0 STUDY AREA The project study area limits will be determined based on the 2%, 2%, 3% rule in accordance with Collier County’s TIS Guidelines and Procedures (Resolution No. 2006-299). As defined by Collier County, the significantly impacted links and intersections are defined as: • Trips distributed on links directly accessed by the project where the project traffic by direction is equal to or exceeds 2% of the peak hour service volume for the adopted LOS standard. • Trips on one link adjacent to the link directly accessed by the project where the project traffic KEISER UNIVERSITY NAPLES CAMPUS METHODOLOGY STATEMENT - 2 - by direction is equal to or greater than 2% the peak hour service volume for the adopted LOS standard. • Trips on all subsequent links where the project traffic by direction is equal to or greater than 3% the peak hour service volume for the adopted LOS standard. 3.0 TRIP GENERATION The A.M. peak hour, P.M. peak hour, and daily trip generations for the project will be estimated using trip generation equations and rates from the TripGen (Version 10.0). The ITE trip generation estimates are summarized in Table 3-1. Table 3-1: ITE Trip Generation Summary Proposed Building Land Use Code Land Use ITE Rate / Equation(1) Square Feet A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour Daily In Out Total In Out Total Junior College 540 Institutional AM: 2.35 65,000 90 63 153 71 77 148 1316 PM: 2.27 Weekday: 20.25 Net New Total 90 63 153 71 77 148 1,316 Footnote: (1) Obtained from TripGen Version 10.0. Equations not available. 4.0 TRIP DISTRIBUTION The project trip distributions will be estimated using the 2018 Collier County Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR), FDOT historical traffic data, and/or available projected student enrollment data made available by Keiser University. 5.0 CAPACITY ANALYSIS A capacity analysis will be conducted using the 2018 Collier County Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR). 6.0 TURN LANE ANALYSIS A deceleration and left turn lane warrant analysis and deceleration and right turn lane warrant analysis will be conducted at the project entrance. Turn lane lengths based on FDOT design criteria. APPENDIX B COLLIER COUNTY SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS AND FDOT 5-YEAR WORK PROGRAM Office of Work Program and Budget Lisa Saliba - Director FDOT Emergency Travel Alert: For information on the current situation, please visit the following page - Alerts. Florida Department of TRANSPORTATION E-Updates | FL511 | Mobile | Site Map Search FDOT...Submit Query • •Home •About FDOT •Contact Us •Offices •Maps & Data •Performance •Projects Web Application Five Year Work Program Selection Criteria District 01 2019-2023 AD (Updated: 2/16/2019-07.17.34) Collier County Transportation System:INTRASTATE STATE HIGHWAY Fiscal Years:2019; 2020; 2021; 2022; 2023; Optional Search Items: Type of Work: (All Types of Work) Transportation System: INTRASTATE STATE HIGHWAY  Strategic Intermodal System (SIS): (All SIS and Non SIS Projects) Only Funds in Fiscal Years: 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Search for Description: Search for Item Number: - Submit Reset Detail Item Report of Selected Records. Description Type of Work COLLIER CO(PRIMARY) ROADWAY & BRIDGE MAINT PRIMARY SYSTEM ROUTINE MAINTENANCE COLLIER COUNTY SCOUR COUNTERMEASURE AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS BRIDGE-REPAIR/REHABILITATION COLLIER COUNTY TRAFFIC SIGNALS REIMBURSEMENT TRAFFIC SIGNALS COLLIER MPO IDENTIFIED OPERATIONAL IMPROVEMENTS FUNDING TRAFFIC OPS IMPROVEMENT COLLIER TMC OPS FUND COUNTY WIDE OTHER ITS HURRICANE IRMA COUNTY WIDE (03) LIGHTING REPAIRS EMERGENCY OPERATIONS HURRICANE IRMA COUNTY WIDE (03) PERMANENT SIGNAL REPAIR EMERGENCY OPERATIONS HURRICANE IRMA FENCE REPAIR SR 29 EMERGENCY OPERATIONS HURRICANE IRMA ON STATE (03) SIGN REPAIR/REPLACEMENT EMERGENCY OPERATIONS MANDARIN GREENWAY SIDEWALKS AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS BIKE LANE/SIDEWALK Page 1 of 3FlDOT OWPB - WP Reports; 5 Year Work Program 2/17/2019https://fdotewp1.dot.state.fl.us/fmsupportapps/WorkProgram/WorkProgram.aspx N 15TH ST (SR 29) INTERSECTION LIGHTING RETROFIT Emerging SIS LIGHTING NAPLES TMC OPERATIONS FUNDING CITY WIDE OTHER ITS NAPLES TRAFFIC SIGNALS REIMBURSEMENT TRAFFIC SIGNALS SIGNAL TIMING US41 FROM SR951/COLLIER BLVD TO OLD US41 TRAFFIC SIGNAL UPDATE SOUTH GOLF DR FROM GULF SHORE BLVD TO W US 41 BIKE LANE/SIDEWALK SR 29 FROM CR 846 E TO N OF NEW MARKET ROAD N Emerging SIS ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT SR 29 FROM I-75 TO OIL WELL RD Emerging SIS PD&E/EMO STUDY SR 29 FROM N OF NEW MARKET RD N ROAD TO SR 82 Emerging SIS ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT SR 29 FROM NORTH 1ST STREET TO NORTH 9TH STREET Emerging SIS PEDESTRIAN SAFETY IMPROVEMENT SR 29 FROM OIL WELL ROAD TO SR 82 Emerging SIS PD&E/EMO STUDY SR 29 FROM S OF AGRICULTURE WAY TO CR 846 E Emerging SIS ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT SR 29 FROM SR 82 TO HENDRY C/L Emerging SIS ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT SR 29 FROM SUNNILAND NURSERY ROAD TO S OF AGRICULTURE WAY Emerging SIS ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT SR 45 FROM GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY TO 6TH AVE N.DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS SR 82 FROM GATOR SLOUGH LANE TO SR 29 Emerging SIS ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT SR 82 FROM HENDRY COUNTY LINE TO GATOR SLOUGH LANE Emerging SIS ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT SR 84 (DAVIS BLVD) FROM SR 90 (US 41) TO AIRPORT PULLING RD RESURFACING SR 90 FROM WHISTLER'S COVE TO COLLIER BLVD RESURFACING SR 951 FROM JUDGE JOLLEY BRIDGE TO FIDDLERS CREEK PARKWAY RESURFACING SR 951 FROM MANATEE RD TO N OF TOWER RD PD&E/EMO STUDY SR 951 FROM MANATEE RD TO N OF TOWER RD ADD LANES & REHABILITATE PVMNT SR 951 OVER BIG MARCO PASS(JUDGE JOLLY MEMORIAL BRIDGE)BRIDGE-REPAIR/REHABILITATION TRAVEL TIME DATA COLLECTION COLLIER COUNTY ITS ARCH ATMS OTHER ITS US 41 (SR 45) FROM S OF DUNRUSS CREEK TO S OF GULF PARK DR RESURFACING US 41 (SR 90) AT OASIS VISITOR CENTER ADD LEFT TURN LANE(S) US 41 FROM CR 846 (111TH AVE) TO N OF 91ST AVE SIDEWALK US 41 FROM N OF PINE RIDGE RD TO S OF PELICAN BAY BLVD SIDEWALK US 41 FROM SR 951 TO GREENWAY LIGHTING US41(SR 90) TAMIAMI TRL FM E OF SR84(DAVIS BLVD) TO COURTHOUSE SHADOWS RESURFACING This site is maintained by the Office of Work Program and Budget, located at 605 Suwannee Street, MS 21, Tallahassee, Florida 32399. For additional information please e-mail questions or comments to: Lisa Saliba: Lisa.Saliba@dot.state.fl.us or call 850-414-4622 View Contact Information for Office of Work Program and Budget Application Home: Work Program Office Home: Office of Work Program and Budget •Contact Us •Employment Page 2 of 3FlDOT OWPB - WP Reports; 5 Year Work Program 2/17/2019https://fdotewp1.dot.state.fl.us/fmsupportapps/WorkProgram/WorkProgram.aspx APPENDIX C ITE TRIP GENERATION ITE TRIP GENERATION (10th Ed.) BASE CONDITION UNDER C-3 ALLOWABLE USES Land Use: 820 Shopping Center Description A shopping center is an integrated group of commercial establishments that is planned, developed, owned, and managed as a unit. A shopping center’s composition is related to its market area in terms of size, location, and type of store. A shopping center also provides on-site parking facilities sufficient to serve its own parking demands. Factory outlet center (Land Use 823) is a related use. Additional Data Shopping centers, including neighborhood centers, community centers, regional centers, and super regional centers, were surveyed for this land use. Some of these centers contained non-merchandising facilities, such as office buildings, movie theaters, restaurants, post offices, banks, health clubs, and recreational facilities (for example, ice skating rinks or indoor miniature golf courses). Many shopping centers, in addition to the integrated unit of shops in one building or enclosed around a mall, include outparcels (peripheral buildings or pads located on the perimeter of the center adjacent to the streets and major access points). These buildings are typically drive-in banks, retail stores, restaurants, or small offices. Although the data herein do not indicate which of the centers studied included peripheral buildings, it can be assumed that some of the data show their effect. The vehicle trips generated at a shopping center are based upon the total GLA of the center. In cases of smaller centers without an enclosed mall or peripheral buildings, the GLA could be the same as the gross floor area of the building. Time-of-day distribution data for this land use are presented in Appendix A. For the 10 general urban/ suburban sites with data, the overall highest vehicle volumes during the AM and PM on a weekday were counted between 11:45 a.m. and 12:45 p.m. and 12:15 and 1:15 p.m., respectively. The average numbers of person trips per vehicle trip at the 27 general urban/suburban sites at which both person trip and vehicle trip data were collected were as follows: • 1.31 during Weekday, AM Peak Hour of Generator • 1.43 during Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, one hour between 4 and 6 p.m. • 1.46 during Weekday, PM Peak Hour of Generator The sites were surveyed in the 1980s, the 1990s, the 2000s, and the 2010s in Alberta (CAN), British Columbia (CAN), California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, and Wisconsin. Source Numbers 105, 110, 154, 156, 159, 186, 190, 198, 199, 202, 204, 211, 213, 239, 251, 259, 260, 269, 294, 295, 299, 300, 301, 304, 305, 307, 308, 309, 310, 311, 314, 315, 316, 317, 319, 358, 365, 376, 385, 390, 400, 404, 414, 420, 423, 428, 437, 440, 442, 444, 446, 507, 562, 580, 598, 629, 658, 702, 715, 728, 868, 870, 871, 880, 899, 908, 912, 915, 926, 936, 944, 946, 960, 961, 962, 973, 974, 978 137Trip Generation Manual 10th Edition • Volume 2: Data • Retail (Land Uses 800–899) Shopping Center (820) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA On a: Weekday, PM Peak Hour of Generator Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 53 Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA: 298 Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 4.21 0.78 - 27.27 2.47 Data Plot and Equation X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA Study Site Average RateFitted Curve Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T) = 0.72 Ln(X) + 3.02 R²= 0.76 Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition Institute of Transportation Engineers 0 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,4000 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 65274 414 Page 1 of 1 2/12/2019https://itetripgen.org/PrintGraph.htm?code=820&ivlabel=TQGFQ&timeperiod=TPGEN&... Shopping Center (820) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA On a: Weekday, AM Peak Hour of Generator Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 47 Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA: 323 Directional Distribution: 54% entering, 46% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 3.00 0.70 - 23.74 1.85 Data Plot and Equation X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA Study Site Average RateFitted Curve Fitted Curve Equation: T = 2.76(X) + 77.28 R²= 0.71 Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition Institute of Transportation Engineers 0 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,4000 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 65195 257 Page 1 of 1 2/12/2019https://itetripgen.org/PrintGraph.htm?code=820&ivlabel=TQGFQ&timeperiod=TAGEN&... Shopping Center (820) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA On a: Weekday Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 147 Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA: 453 Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 37.75 7.42 - 207.98 16.41 Data Plot and Equation X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA Study Site Average RateFitted Curve Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T) = 0.68 Ln(X) + 5.57 R²= 0.76 Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition Institute of Transportation Engineers 0 500 1,000 1,5000 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000 652454 4485 Page 1 of 1 2/12/2019https://itetripgen.org/PrintGraph.htm?code=820&ivlabel=TQGFQ&timeperiod=AWDVTE... ITE TRIP GENERATION (10th Ed.) CONDITIONAL USE SCENARIO 1 – EDUCATIONAL FACILITY Land Use: 540 Junior/Community College Description This land use includes two-year junior, community, and technical colleges. Four-year (or more) colleges or universities are included in university/college (Land Use 550). A number of two-year institutions have sizable evening programs. Additional Data The trip generation for weekend time periods varied considerably; therefore, caution should be used when applying weekend statistics. Information describing the weekend activities conducted at junior/community colleges was not available. To assist in future analysis of this land use, it is important to specify if transit service was available within close proximity to the site. Acreage, floor space, staff, and parking accommodations varied widely with the populations served and the social and economic characteristics of the area; thus, the number of students may be a more reliable independent variable on which to establish trip generation rates. Time-of-day distribution data for this land use are presented in Appendix A. For the seven general urban/suburban sites with data, the overall highest vehicle volumes during the AM and PM on a weekday were counted between 11:30 a.m. and 12:30 p.m. and 12:30 and 1:30 p.m., respectively. The sites were surveyed in the 1980s, the 1990s, and the 2010s in Alberta (CAN), Kansas, New Mexico, and Texas. Source Numbers 396, 413, 533, 628, 877, 971 114 Trip Generation Manual 10th Edition • Volume 2: Data • Institutional (Land Uses 500–599) Junior/Community College (540) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA On a: Weekday, AM Peak Hour of Generator Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 11 Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA: 522 Directional Distribution: 59% entering, 41% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 2.35 0.58 - 9.59 2.10 Data Plot and Equation X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA Study Site Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation: Not Given R²= **** Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition Institute of Transportation Engineers 0 200 400 600 8000 1,000 2,000 3,000 65 153 Page 1 of 1 2/10/2019https://itetripgen.org/PrintGraph.htm?code=540&ivlabel=QFQAF&timeperiod=TAGEN&... Junior/Community College (540) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA On a: Weekday, PM Peak Hour of Generator Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 11 Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA: 522 Directional Distribution: 48% entering, 52% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 2.27 0.64 - 9.92 2.12 Data Plot and Equation X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA Study Site Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation: Not Given R²= **** Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition Institute of Transportation Engineers 0 200 400 600 8000 1,000 2,000 3,000 65 148 Page 1 of 1 2/10/2019https://itetripgen.org/PrintGraph.htm?code=540&ivlabel=QFQAF&timeperiod=TPGEN&... Junior/Community College (540) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA On a: Weekday Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 10 Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA: 571 Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 20.25 4.60 - 81.08 18.11 Data Plot and Equation X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA Study Site Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation: Not Given R²= **** Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition Institute of Transportation Engineers 0 200 400 600 8000 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 65 1316 Page 1 of 1 2/10/2019https://itetripgen.org/PrintGraph.htm?code=540&ivlabel=QFQAF&timeperiod=AWDVTE... ITE TRIP GENERATION (10th Ed.) CONDITIONAL USE SCENARIO 2 – EDUCATIONAL FACILITY AND COMMERCIAL MIXED USE Land Use: 540 Junior/Community College Description This land use includes two-year junior, community, and technical colleges. Four-year (or more) colleges or universities are included in university/college (Land Use 550). A number of two-year institutions have sizable evening programs. Additional Data The trip generation for weekend time periods varied considerably; therefore, caution should be used when applying weekend statistics. Information describing the weekend activities conducted at junior/community colleges was not available. To assist in future analysis of this land use, it is important to specify if transit service was available within close proximity to the site. Acreage, floor space, staff, and parking accommodations varied widely with the populations served and the social and economic characteristics of the area; thus, the number of students may be a more reliable independent variable on which to establish trip generation rates. Time-of-day distribution data for this land use are presented in Appendix A. For the seven general urban/suburban sites with data, the overall highest vehicle volumes during the AM and PM on a weekday were counted between 11:30 a.m. and 12:30 p.m. and 12:30 and 1:30 p.m., respectively. The sites were surveyed in the 1980s, the 1990s, and the 2010s in Alberta (CAN), Kansas, New Mexico, and Texas. Source Numbers 396, 413, 533, 628, 877, 971 114 Trip Generation Manual 10th Edition • Volume 2: Data • Institutional (Land Uses 500–599) Junior/Community College (540) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA On a: Weekday, AM Peak Hour of Generator Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 11 Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA: 522 Directional Distribution: 59% entering, 41% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 2.35 0.58 - 9.59 2.10 Data Plot and Equation X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA Study Site Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation: Not Given R²= **** Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition Institute of Transportation Engineers 0 200 400 600 8000 1,000 2,000 3,000 40 94 Page 1 of 1 2/12/2019https://itetripgen.org/PrintGraph.htm?code=540&ivlabel=QFQAF&timeperiod=TAGEN&... Junior/Community College (540) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA On a: Weekday, PM Peak Hour of Generator Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 11 Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA: 522 Directional Distribution: 48% entering, 52% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 2.27 0.64 - 9.92 2.12 Data Plot and Equation X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA Study Site Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation: Not Given R²= **** Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition Institute of Transportation Engineers 0 200 400 600 8000 1,000 2,000 3,000 40 91 Page 1 of 1 2/12/2019https://itetripgen.org/PrintGraph.htm?code=540&ivlabel=QFQAF&timeperiod=TPGEN&... Junior/Community College (540) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA On a: Weekday Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 10 Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA: 571 Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 20.25 4.60 - 81.08 18.11 Data Plot and Equation X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA Study Site Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation: Not Given R²= **** Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition Institute of Transportation Engineers 0 200 400 600 8000 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 40 810 Page 1 of 1 2/12/2019https://itetripgen.org/PrintGraph.htm?code=540&ivlabel=QFQAF&timeperiod=AWDVTE... Land Use: 820 Shopping Center Description A shopping center is an integrated group of commercial establishments that is planned, developed, owned, and managed as a unit. A shopping center’s composition is related to its market area in terms of size, location, and type of store. A shopping center also provides on-site parking facilities sufficient to serve its own parking demands. Factory outlet center (Land Use 823) is a related use. Additional Data Shopping centers, including neighborhood centers, community centers, regional centers, and super regional centers, were surveyed for this land use. Some of these centers contained non-merchandising facilities, such as office buildings, movie theaters, restaurants, post offices, banks, health clubs, and recreational facilities (for example, ice skating rinks or indoor miniature golf courses). Many shopping centers, in addition to the integrated unit of shops in one building or enclosed around a mall, include outparcels (peripheral buildings or pads located on the perimeter of the center adjacent to the streets and major access points). These buildings are typically drive-in banks, retail stores, restaurants, or small offices. Although the data herein do not indicate which of the centers studied included peripheral buildings, it can be assumed that some of the data show their effect. The vehicle trips generated at a shopping center are based upon the total GLA of the center. In cases of smaller centers without an enclosed mall or peripheral buildings, the GLA could be the same as the gross floor area of the building. Time-of-day distribution data for this land use are presented in Appendix A. For the 10 general urban/ suburban sites with data, the overall highest vehicle volumes during the AM and PM on a weekday were counted between 11:45 a.m. and 12:45 p.m. and 12:15 and 1:15 p.m., respectively. The average numbers of person trips per vehicle trip at the 27 general urban/suburban sites at which both person trip and vehicle trip data were collected were as follows: • 1.31 during Weekday, AM Peak Hour of Generator • 1.43 during Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, one hour between 4 and 6 p.m. • 1.46 during Weekday, PM Peak Hour of Generator The sites were surveyed in the 1980s, the 1990s, the 2000s, and the 2010s in Alberta (CAN), British Columbia (CAN), California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, and Wisconsin. Source Numbers 105, 110, 154, 156, 159, 186, 190, 198, 199, 202, 204, 211, 213, 239, 251, 259, 260, 269, 294, 295, 299, 300, 301, 304, 305, 307, 308, 309, 310, 311, 314, 315, 316, 317, 319, 358, 365, 376, 385, 390, 400, 404, 414, 420, 423, 428, 437, 440, 442, 444, 446, 507, 562, 580, 598, 629, 658, 702, 715, 728, 868, 870, 871, 880, 899, 908, 912, 915, 926, 936, 944, 946, 960, 961, 962, 973, 974, 978 137Trip Generation Manual 10th Edition • Volume 2: Data • Retail (Land Uses 800–899) Shopping Center (820) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA On a: Weekday, AM Peak Hour of Generator Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 47 Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA: 323 Directional Distribution: 54% entering, 46% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 3.00 0.70 - 23.74 1.85 Data Plot and Equation X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA Study Site Average RateFitted Curve Fitted Curve Equation: T = 2.76(X) + 77.28 R²= 0.71 Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition Institute of Transportation Engineers 0 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,4000 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 2575 146 Page 1 of 1 2/12/2019https://itetripgen.org/PrintGraph.htm?code=820&ivlabel=TQGFQ&timeperiod=TAGEN&... Shopping Center (820) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA On a: Weekday, PM Peak Hour of Generator Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 53 Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA: 298 Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 4.21 0.78 - 27.27 2.47 Data Plot and Equation X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA Study Site Average RateFitted Curve Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T) = 0.72 Ln(X) + 3.02 R²= 0.76 Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition Institute of Transportation Engineers 0 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,4000 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 25105 208 Page 1 of 1 2/12/2019https://itetripgen.org/PrintGraph.htm?code=820&ivlabel=TQGFQ&timeperiod=TPGEN&... Shopping Center (820) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA On a: Weekday Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 147 Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA: 453 Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 37.75 7.42 - 207.98 16.41 Data Plot and Equation X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA Study Site Average RateFitted Curve Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T) = 0.68 Ln(X) + 5.57 R²= 0.76 Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition Institute of Transportation Engineers 0 500 1,000 1,5000 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000 25944 2342 Page 1 of 1 2/12/2019https://itetripgen.org/PrintGraph.htm?code=820&ivlabel=TQGFQ&timeperiod=AWDVTE... APPENDIX D TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS L T R Ped.L T R Ped.L U-Turn R Ped.L U-Turn R Ped. 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 5 4 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 11 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 4 1 2 0 3 1 2 0 18 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 3 1 1 0 5 2 1 0 18 3 0 3 0 1 0 1 0 3 4 1 0 1 1 3 0 21 9 0 6 0 2 0 1 0 6 3 1 0 2 0 0 0 30 9 0 6 0 5 1 1 0 2 5 4 0 1 0 1 0 35 5 0 5 0 3 0 4 0 10 3 2 0 4 4 7 0 47 36 0 25 0 16 1 7 0 29 19 13 0 16 9 14 0 185 26 0 20 0 11 1 7 0 21 15 8 0 8 5 11 0 133 0.72 NA 0.83 NA 0.55 0.25 0.44 NA 0.53 0.75 0.50 NA 0.50 0.31 0.39 NA 0.71 6:30 6:45 SUMMARY OF VEHICLE MOVEMENTS LOCATION:Guilford and US 41 2/5/2019 COUNTY: Collier OBSERVER: Joe ROAD CONDITION: Dry REMARKS: Total 7:00 VEHICLE MOVEMENTS TIME NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND BEGIN 6:00 6:15 7:15 7:30 7:45 TOTAL PK. HOUR TOTAL P.H.F. R L R N L Street: Tamiami Trail Street: Guilford Rd T T R L L R Towne Centre L T R Ped.L T R Ped.L U-Turn R Ped.L U-Turn R Ped. 7 0 8 0 38 2 18 0 5 26 6 0 6 0 13 0 129 4 0 3 0 36 0 4 0 9 16 3 0 2 0 10 0 87 6 2 4 0 47 3 3 0 7 23 5 0 7 3 13 0 123 8 1 3 0 41 0 2 0 12 18 10 0 1 1 20 0 117 3 1 5 0 44 0 3 0 7 21 4 0 3 2 13 0 106 8 0 4 0 35 1 4 0 13 19 7 0 5 4 16 0 116 3 0 3 0 37 1 2 0 14 28 8 0 5 2 15 0 118 5 0 5 0 34 0 8 0 11 17 8 0 6 3 24 0 121 44 4 35 0 312 7 44 0 78 168 51 0 35 15 124 0 917 19 1 17 0 150 2 17 0 45 85 27 0 19 11 68 0 461 0.59 0.25 0.85 NA 0.85 0.50 0.53 NA 0.80 0.76 0.84 NA 0.79 0.69 0.71 NA 0.95 5:15 5:30 5:45 TOTAL PK. HOUR TOTAL P.H.F. 5:00 REMARKS: VEHICLE MOVEMENTS TIME NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND BEGIN 4:00 4:15 4:30 4:45 SUMMARY OF VEHICLE MOVEMENTS Total LOCATION:Guilford and US 41 2/5/2019 COUNTY: Collier OBSERVER: BDM ROAD CONDITION: Dry R L R N L Street: Tamiami Trail Street: Guilford Rd T T R L L R Towne Centre L T R Ped.L T R Ped.L U-Turn R Ped.L U-Turn R Ped. 15 1 0 0 2 0 4 0 1 0 1 0 3 0 2 0 29 19 1 4 0 10 4 12 0 4 3 7 0 3 0 13 0 80 18 4 1 0 6 0 18 0 3 0 10 0 4 0 9 0 73 25 1 3 0 18 2 11 0 9 2 1 0 1 0 8 0 81 30 0 1 0 6 4 15 0 13 0 11 0 5 0 12 0 97 17 6 3 0 13 3 8 0 9 0 13 0 4 0 13 0 89 34 2 1 0 21 5 31 0 14 5 17 0 4 6 15 0 155 33 5 2 0 22 9 19 0 14 2 18 0 7 4 24 0 159 191 20 15 0 98 27 118 0 67 12 78 0 31 10 96 0 763 114 13 7 0 62 21 73 0 50 7 59 0 20 10 64 0 500 0.84 0.54 0.58 NA 0.70 0.58 0.59 NA 0.89 0.35 0.82 NA 0.71 0.42 0.67 NA 0.79 7:15 7:30 7:45 TOTAL PK. HOUR TOTAL P.H.F. 7:00 REMARKS: VEHICLE MOVEMENTS TIME NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND BEGIN 6:00 6:15 6:30 6:45 SUMMARY OF VEHICLE MOVEMENTS Total LOCATION:Lakewood and US 41 2/5/2019 COUNTY: Collier OBSERVER: Ray D. ROAD CONDITION: Dry R L R N L Street: Tamiami Trail Street: Lakewood Blvd T T R L L R Taco BellGas Station L T R Ped.L T R Ped.L U-Turn R Ped.L U-Turn R Ped. 26 14 5 0 14 7 9 0 31 4 39 0 13 18 22 0 202 20 8 15 0 32 3 8 0 26 2 40 0 11 11 16 0 192 27 14 10 0 20 6 7 0 20 2 18 0 5 7 21 0 157 24 10 6 0 31 4 21 0 24 3 35 0 2 10 14 0 184 37 12 9 0 32 8 14 0 45 11 42 0 6 8 17 0 241 24 12 14 0 27 8 15 0 39 5 34 0 22 11 15 0 226 36 25 4 0 33 5 16 0 41 2 41 0 5 12 23 0 243 23 9 13 0 30 8 8 0 26 3 55 0 4 17 20 0 216 217 104 76 0 219 49 98 0 252 32 304 0 68 94 148 0 1661 120 58 40 0 122 29 53 0 151 21 172 0 37 48 75 0 926 0.81 0.58 0.71 NA 0.92 0.91 0.83 NA 0.84 0.48 0.78 NA 0.42 0.71 0.82 NA 0.95 5:15 5:30 5:45 TOTAL PK. HOUR TOTAL P.H.F. 5:00 REMARKS: VEHICLE MOVEMENTS TIME NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND BEGIN 4:00 4:15 4:30 4:45 SUMMARY OF VEHICLE MOVEMENTS Total LOCATION:Lakewood and US 41 2/5/2019 COUNTY: Collier OBSERVER: RAP ROAD CONDITION: Dry R L R N L Street: Tamiami Trail Street: Lakewood Blvd T T R L L R Taco BellGas Station L T R Ped.L T R Ped.L U-Turn R Ped.L U-Turn R Ped. 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 2 3 0 1 0 0 0 13 4 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 12 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 7 2 0 0 5 1 1 0 20 3 0 5 0 1 0 4 0 4 2 2 0 0 0 1 0 22 3 0 4 0 2 0 1 0 3 4 0 0 2 0 2 0 21 8 0 4 0 4 0 1 0 4 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 25 6 0 2 0 7 0 1 0 3 3 2 0 5 6 8 0 43 32 0 21 0 15 0 8 0 22 18 10 0 13 8 13 0 160 20 0 15 0 14 0 7 0 14 11 4 0 7 7 12 0 111 0.63 NA 0.75 NA 0.50 NA 0.44 NA 0.88 0.69 0.50 NA 0.35 0.29 0.38 NA 0.65 7:15 7:30 7:45 TOTAL PK. HOUR TOTAL P.H.F. 7:00 REMARKS: VEHICLE MOVEMENTS TIME NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND BEGIN 6:00 6:15 6:30 6:45 SUMMARY OF VEHICLE MOVEMENTS Total LOCATION:Guilford and US 41 2/6/2019 COUNTY: Collier OBSERVER: Joe ROAD CONDITION: Dry R L R N L Street: Tamiami Trail Street: Guilford Rd T T R L L R Towne Centre L T R Ped.L T R Ped.L U-Turn R Ped.L U-Turn R Ped. 3 0 7 0 47 1 6 0 4 20 7 0 7 0 32 0 134 2 1 9 0 49 1 6 0 8 25 6 0 5 0 19 0 131 2 0 5 0 52 2 0 0 7 22 6 0 9 2 19 0 126 8 2 2 0 43 1 4 0 11 21 4 0 4 3 23 0 126 5 0 3 0 37 2 3 0 4 23 6 0 4 2 13 0 102 6 1 1 0 45 2 1 0 8 26 3 0 3 0 14 0 110 2 0 2 0 41 1 7 0 5 18 10 0 5 1 22 0 114 4 0 4 0 34 0 6 0 9 14 2 0 5 0 18 0 96 32 4 33 0 348 10 33 0 56 169 44 0 42 8 160 0 939 15 3 23 0 191 5 16 0 30 88 23 0 25 5 93 0 517 0.47 0.38 0.64 NA 0.92 0.63 0.67 NA 0.68 0.88 0.82 NA 0.69 0.42 0.73 NA 0.96 5:15 5:30 5:45 TOTAL PK. HOUR TOTAL P.H.F. 5:00 REMARKS: VEHICLE MOVEMENTS TIME NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND BEGIN 4:00 4:15 4:30 4:45 SUMMARY OF VEHICLE MOVEMENTS Total LOCATION:Guilford and US 41 2/6/2019 COUNTY: Collier OBSERVER: BDM ROAD CONDITION: Dry R L R N L Street: Tamiami Trail Street: Guilford Rd T T R L L R Towne Centre L T R Ped.L T R Ped.L U-Turn R Ped.L U-Turn R Ped. 12 3 0 0 4 0 7 0 2 2 0 0 2 0 3 0 35 24 0 1 0 5 2 8 0 3 1 9 0 2 0 6 0 61 23 1 0 0 10 1 8 0 0 1 11 0 2 2 5 0 64 30 0 1 0 14 2 13 0 2 2 9 0 2 1 10 0 86 29 0 3 0 11 3 8 0 6 5 13 0 4 0 14 0 96 36 3 2 0 13 7 21 0 14 2 16 0 5 0 13 0 132 22 3 3 0 25 6 34 0 8 1 21 0 3 0 19 0 145 41 4 3 0 23 11 15 0 4 2 21 0 7 9 17 0 157 217 14 13 0 105 32 114 0 39 16 100 0 27 12 87 0 776 128 10 11 0 72 27 78 0 32 10 71 0 19 9 63 0 530 0.78 0.63 0.92 NA 0.72 0.61 0.57 NA 0.57 0.50 0.85 NA 0.68 0.25 0.83 NA 0.84 7:15 7:30 7:45 TOTAL PK. HOUR TOTAL P.H.F. 7:00 REMARKS: VEHICLE MOVEMENTS TIME NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND BEGIN 6:00 6:15 6:30 6:45 SUMMARY OF VEHICLE MOVEMENTS Total LOCATION:Lakewood and US 41 2/6/2019 COUNTY: Collier OBSERVER: Ray D. ROAD CONDITION: Dry R L R N L Street: Tamiami Trail Street: Lakewood Blvd T T R L L R Taco BellGas Station L T R Ped.L T R Ped.L U-Turn R Ped.L U-Turn R Ped. 23 9 15 0 38 3 21 0 27 9 43 0 13 13 21 0 235 31 8 11 0 32 5 16 0 28 4 39 0 11 4 24 0 213 31 7 8 0 31 9 10 0 23 4 27 0 4 7 14 0 175 35 11 9 0 26 4 10 0 35 4 46 0 10 13 16 0 219 35 7 13 0 30 8 12 0 42 5 55 0 19 18 21 0 265 17 6 11 0 20 6 13 0 25 6 34 0 6 6 27 0 177 30 5 6 0 16 7 10 0 41 7 27 0 3 5 22 0 179 23 11 10 0 32 11 12 0 24 3 37 0 12 9 7 0 191 225 64 83 0 225 53 104 0 245 42 308 0 78 75 152 0 1654 132 33 41 0 119 26 48 0 128 17 167 0 44 42 75 0 872 0.94 0.75 0.79 NA 0.93 0.72 0.75 NA 0.76 0.85 0.76 NA 0.58 0.58 0.78 NA 0.82 5:15 5:30 5:45 TOTAL PK. HOUR TOTAL P.H.F. 5:00 REMARKS: VEHICLE MOVEMENTS TIME NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND BEGIN 4:00 4:15 4:30 4:45 SUMMARY OF VEHICLE MOVEMENTS Total LOCATION:Lakewood and US 41 2/6/2019 COUNTY: Collier OBSERVER: RAP ROAD CONDITION: Dry R L R N L Street: Tamiami Trail Street: Lakewood Blvd T T R L L R Taco BellGas Station APPENDIX E FDOT HISTORIC COUNTS FROM COUNT STATION SITE 0094 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TRANSPORTATION STATISTICS OFFICE 2017 HISTORICAL AADT REPORTCOUNTY: 03 - COLLIERSITE: 0094 - SR-90/US-41,.3 MI SE OF CR31/AIRPORT RD,COLLIER COYEAR AADT DIRECTION 1 DIRECTION 2 *K FACTOR D FACTOR T FACTOR---- ---------- ------------ ------------ --------- -------- --------2017 41302 C E 20367 W 20935 9.00 56.20 2.902016 42286 C E 20878 W 21408 9.00 55.80 2.902015 41557 C E 20496 W 21061 9.00 55.00 3.002014 40223 C E 19973 W 20250 9.00 56.00 2.802013 39232 C E 19454 W 19778 9.00 54.50 2.902012 38102 C E 18903 W 19199 9.00 54.60 2.902011 38035 C E 19052 W 18983 9.00 54.40 3.002010 39899 C E 19861 W 20038 11.03 54.40 3.002009 41162 C E 20478 W 20684 10.94 55.85 3.002008 41699 C E 20892 W 20807 10.83 56.26 3.202007 43776 C E 21744 W 22032 10.40 55.47 3.202006 45559 C E 22510 W 23049 10.22 56.00 3.602005 45229 C E 22337 W 22892 10.30 57.10 3.302004 44055 C E 21655 W 22400 10.00 57.10 5.102003 41463 C E 20157 W 21306 9.90 56.70 2.202002 40258 C E 19461 W 20797 10.20 57.20 2.20 AADT FLAGS: C = COMPUTED; E = MANUAL ESTIMATE; F = FIRST YEAR ESTIMATE S = SECOND YEAR ESTIMATE; T = THIRD YEAR ESTIMATE; R = FOURTH YEAR ESTIMATE V = FIFTH YEAR ESTIMATE; 6 = SIXTH YEAR ESTIMATE; X = UNKNOWN *K FACTOR: STARTING WITH YEAR 2011 IS STANDARDK, PRIOR YEARS ARE K30 VALUES 2017 PEAK SEASON FACTOR CATEGORY REPORT - REPORT TYPE: ALL CATEGORY: 0301 US 41, N OF SR 951 MOCF: 0.86 WEEK DATES SF PSCF ================================================================================ 1 01/01/2017 - 01/07/2017 1.15 1.34 2 01/08/2017 - 01/14/2017 1.02 1.19 * 3 01/15/2017 - 01/21/2017 0.88 1.02 * 4 01/22/2017 - 01/28/2017 0.87 1.01 * 5 01/29/2017 - 02/04/2017 0.86 1.00 * 6 02/05/2017 - 02/11/2017 0.84 0.98 * 7 02/12/2017 - 02/18/2017 0.83 0.97 * 8 02/19/2017 - 02/25/2017 0.83 0.97 * 9 02/26/2017 - 03/04/2017 0.83 0.97 *10 03/05/2017 - 03/11/2017 0.83 0.97 *11 03/12/2017 - 03/18/2017 0.83 0.97 *12 03/19/2017 - 03/25/2017 0.85 0.99 *13 03/26/2017 - 04/01/2017 0.87 1.01 *14 04/02/2017 - 04/08/2017 0.89 1.03 *15 04/09/2017 - 04/15/2017 0.91 1.06 16 04/16/2017 - 04/22/2017 0.94 1.09 17 04/23/2017 - 04/29/2017 0.97 1.13 18 04/30/2017 - 05/06/2017 0.99 1.15 19 05/07/2017 - 05/13/2017 1.02 1.19 20 05/14/2017 - 05/20/2017 1.05 1.22 21 05/21/2017 - 05/27/2017 1.07 1.24 22 05/28/2017 - 06/03/2017 1.10 1.28 23 06/04/2017 - 06/10/2017 1.12 1.30 24 06/11/2017 - 06/17/2017 1.14 1.33 25 06/18/2017 - 06/24/2017 1.14 1.33 26 06/25/2017 - 07/01/2017 1.14 1.33 27 07/02/2017 - 07/08/2017 1.13 1.31 28 07/09/2017 - 07/15/2017 1.13 1.31 29 07/16/2017 - 07/22/2017 1.13 1.31 30 07/23/2017 - 07/29/2017 1.13 1.31 31 07/30/2017 - 08/05/2017 1.13 1.31 32 08/06/2017 - 08/12/2017 1.13 1.31 33 08/13/2017 - 08/19/2017 1.13 1.31 34 08/20/2017 - 08/26/2017 1.19 1.38 35 08/27/2017 - 09/02/2017 1.25 1.45 36 09/03/2017 - 09/09/2017 1.30 1.51 37 09/10/2017 - 09/16/2017 1.36 1.58 38 09/17/2017 - 09/23/2017 1.34 1.56 39 09/24/2017 - 09/30/2017 1.31 1.52 40 10/01/2017 - 10/07/2017 1.29 1.50 41 10/08/2017 - 10/14/2017 1.26 1.47 42 10/15/2017 - 10/21/2017 1.24 1.44 43 10/22/2017 - 10/28/2017 1.22 1.42 44 10/29/2017 - 11/04/2017 1.21 1.41 45 11/05/2017 - 11/11/2017 1.19 1.38 46 11/12/2017 - 11/18/2017 1.17 1.36 47 11/19/2017 - 11/25/2017 1.17 1.36 48 11/26/2017 - 12/02/2017 1.16 1.35 49 12/03/2017 - 12/09/2017 1.16 1.35 50 12/10/2017 - 12/16/2017 1.15 1.34 51 12/17/2017 - 12/23/2017 1.06 1.23 52 12/24/2017 - 12/30/2017 0.97 1.13 53 12/31/2017 - 12/31/2017 0.88 1.02 * PEAK SEASON 02-MAR-2018 15:35:04 830UPD 1_0301_PKSEASON.TXT APPENDIX F EXCERPTS FROM COLLIER COUNTY 2018 AUIR Attachment "F"56 57 58 56 57 58 61 63 64 65 66Collier County 2016 Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR) Based on Adopted LOS, Trip Bank and Traffic Counts2016 2017 20182017 20172017 2018Traffic 1/7th TripPeak Hour Peak Peak Peak2018 20182017 1/7thVer. B2018 1/7th 1/7th TBCount BankPeak Dir Hour Hour Hour Actual Percent2017 1/7th Total 1/7th TB 2018 1/7th Total 1/7th TB2018 L Year YearExist Cnt. Min Peak Service Peak Dir Peak Dir Peak Dir Variation VariationTrip Trip Trip2017Trip Trip Trip2018 Remain.1/7th TBO Expected ExpectedID# CIE# Proj# Road# Link From To Road Sta. Std Dir Volume Volume Volume Volume To Volume To VolumeBank Bank BankVolumeBank Bank BankVolume Capacity V/C S Deficient Deficient45 45 541.0 99910 CR31 Airport Road Immokalee Road Vanderbilt Beach Road 4D 554 D N 2,200 1230 1240 1220(20) -1.61%10 0 10 1250 25 0 25 1245 955 56.6% C2.1 55 62031 CR31 Airport Road Vanderbilt Beach Road Orange Blossom Drive 6D 599 E N 3,0001950 1970 1810(160) -8.12%70 0 70 2040 66 0 66 1876 1124 62.5% C2.2 55 62031 CR31 Airport Road Orange Blossom Drive Pine Ridge Road 6D 503 E N 3,000 1830 1860 1770(90) -4.84%94 0 94 1954 54 0 54 1824 1176 60.8% C3.0 39 60121 CR31 Airport Road Pine Ridge Road Golden Gate Parkway 6D 502 E N 3,000 1770 1980 2330 350 17.68% 7 0 7 1987 14 0 14 2344 656 78.1% D4.0 99906 CR31 Airport Road Golden Gate Parkway Radio Road 6D 533 E N 2,800 2060 2290 2310 20 0.87% 18 0 18 2308 22 0 22 2332 468 83.3% D 20285.0 3 66031 CR31 Airport Road Radio Road Davis Boulevard 6D 553 E N 2,800 2040 2100 2230 130 6.19% 17 0 17 2117 11 0 11 2241 559 80.0% D6.0 3 66031 CR31 Airport Road Davis Boulevard US 41 (Tamiami Trail) 6D 552 E S 2,700 1590 1610 1650 40 2.48% 10 0 10 1620 73 2 75 1725 975 63.9% C7.0 99911 Bayshore Drive US 41 (Tamiami Trail) Thomasson Drive 4D 521 D S 1,800 600 650 620(30) -4.62%45 0 45 695 116 2 118 738 1062 41.0% B8.0 31 60021 CR 865 Bonita Beach Road West of Vanderbilt Drive Hickory Boulevard 4D 653 D E 1,900 1050 1070 1060(10) -0.93%0 0 0 1070 0 0 0 1060 840 55.8% C9.0 Carson Road Lake Trafford Road Immokalee Drive 2U 610 D N 600 310 320 330 10 3.13% 0 0 0 320 0 0 0 330 270 55.0% C10.0 33 60101 County Barn Road Davis Boulevard Rattlesnake Hammock Road 2U 519 D S 900 320 326 380 54 16.42% 65 0 65 391 123 1 124 504 396 56.0% C11.0 99912 CR29 CR 29 US 41 (Tamiami Trail) Everglades City 2U 582A D S 1,000 100 190 160(30) -15.79%0 0 0 190 0 0 0 160 840 16.0% B12.0 SR84 Davis Boulevard US 41 (Tamiami Trail) Airport Road 6D 558 E E 2,700 1520 1550 1610 60 3.87% 33 0 33 1583 56 0 56 1666 1034 61.7% C13.0 48 60161 SR84 Davis Boulevard Airport Road Lakewood Boulevard 4D 559 D E 2,000 1550 1500 1580 80 5.33% 4 0 4 1504 0 0 0 1580 420 79.0% D14.0 49 60161 SR84 Davis Boulevard Lakewood Boulevard County Barn Road 4D 658 D E 2,000 1530 1610 1670 60 3.73% 61 0 61 1671 61 0 61 1731 269 86.6% D 202615.0 83 60161 SR84 Davis Boulevard County Barn Road Santa Barbara Boulevard 4D 538 D E 2,200 1460 1440 1460 20 1.39% 144 0 144 1584 196 0 196 1656 544 75.3% D16.1 83 SR84 Davis Boulevard Santa Barbara Boulevard Radio Road6D 560D EE 3,300 650 700 74040 5.71% 24 139 163 863 86 139 225 965 2335 29.2% B16.2 83 SR84 Davis BoulevardRadio RoadCollier Boulevard6D 601D EW 3,300 1050 1080 112040 3.70% 34 214 248 1328 82 214 296 1416 1884 42.9% B17.0 62 63041 CR876 Golden Gate Boulevard Collier BoulevardWilson Boulevard4D 531 D E 2,300 1660 1600 1710 110 6.88% 0 0 0 1600 0 0 0 1710 590 74.3% C18.0 99913 CR886 Golden Gate Parkway US 41 (Tamiami Trail) Goodlette-Frank Road6D 530 E E 2,700 1210 1230 12300 0.00% 13 0 13 1243 13 0 13 1243 145746.0% B19.0 5 60027C CR886 Golden Gate Parkway Goodlette-Frank Road Airport Road6D 507 E E 3,300 2780 2710 2930 220 8.12% 5 0 5 2715 5 0 5 2935 365 88.9% D202420.1 74 60006 CR886 Golden Gate Parkway Airport RoadLivingston Road6D 508 E E 3,300 2280 2200 229090 4.09% 0 0 0 2200 12 0 12 2302 998 69.8% C20.2 74 60006 CR886 Golden Gate Parkway Livingston RoadI-756D 691 E E 3,300 2890 2770 2610(160) -5.78%1 0 1 2771 0 0 0 2610 690 79.1% D21.0 74 60027 CR886 Golden Gate Parkway I-75Santa Barbara Boulevard 6D 509 E E 3,300 1980 1960 2140 180 9.18% 14 0 14 1974 14 0 14 2154 1146 65.3% C22.0 99916 CR886 Golden Gate Parkway Santa Barbara Boulevard Collier Boulevard4D 605 D E 1,800 1450 1550 161060 3.87% 59 8 67 1617 43 8 51 1661 139 92.3% D202323.0 19 68041 CR851 Goodlette-Frank Road Immokalee RoadVanderbilt Beach Road 2U 594 D N 1,000 860 930 820(110) -11.83%15 0 15 945 46 0 46 866 134 86.6% D202624.1 65 60134 CR851 Goodlette-Frank Road Vanderbilt Beach Road Orange Blossom Drive 4D 595 E N 2,400 1340 1350 137020 1.48% 73 0 73 1423 73 0 73 1443 957 60.1% C24.2 65 60134 CR851 Goodlette-Frank Road Orange Blossom Drive Pine Ridge Road6D 581 E N 2,400 1530 1550 1680 130 8.39% 0 0 0 1550 0 0 0 1680 720 70.0% C25.0 88 60005 CR851 Goodlette-Frank Road Pine Ridge RoadGolden Gate Parkway6D 505 E N 3,000 1850 1890 2220 330 17.46% 0 0 0 1890 0 0 0 2220 780 74.0% C 26.0 99917 CR851 Goodlette-Frank Road Golden Gate Parkway US 41 (Tamiami Trail) 6D 504 E N 2,700 2250 2190 2480 290 13.24% 0 0 0 2190 0 0 0 2480 220 91.9% D 2023 202327.0 87 68055 Green BoulevardSanta Barbara Boulevard Collier Boulevard2U 642 D E 900 720 730 680(50) -6.85%0 0 0 730 0 0 0 680 220 75.6% D29.0 66011 Gulfshore Drive111th AvenueVanderbilt Beach Road 2U 583a D N 800 230 235 220(15) -6.22%0 0 0 235 0 0 0 220 580 27.5% B30.1 37 65061 CR951 Collier BoulevardImmokalee RoadVanderbilt Beach Road 6D 655 E N 3,000 1450 1520 1680 160 10.53% 273 174 447 1967 419 128 547 2227773 74.2% C30.2 37 65061 CR951 Collier BoulevardVanderbilt Beach Road Golden Gate Boulevard 6D 584 E S 3,000 1200 1220 12200 0.00% 48 38 86 1306 79 39 118 1338 1662 44.6% B31.1 85 68056 CR951 Collier BoulevardGolden Gate Boulevard Pine Ridge Road6D 536 D N 3,000 1867 1904 1780(124) -6.51%26 16 42 1946 48 30 78 1858 1142 61.9% C31.2 85 68056 CR951 Collier BoulevardPine Ridge RoadGreen Boulevard6D 536 D N 3,000 1867 1904 1780(124) -6.51%32 12 44 1948 38 22 60 1840 1160 61.3% C32.1 76 65062 CR951 Collier BoulevardGreen BoulevardGolden Gate Pwky4D 525 D N 2,300 1370 1410 150090 6.38% 27 0 27 1437 27 0 27 1527 773 66.4% C32.2 76 68056B CR951 Collier BoulevardGolden Gate PwkyGolden Gate Main Canal 4D 607 D N 2,300 1250 1260 1370 110 8.73% 53 162 215 1475 55 162 217 1587 713 69.0% C32.3 76 68056B CR951 Collier BoulevardGolden Gate Main Canal I-758D 607 E N 3,600 1250 1260 1370 110 8.73% 55 258 313 1573 66 258 324 1694 1906 47.1% B33.0 61 60092 SR951 Collier BoulevardI-75Davis Boulevard8D 573 E N 3,600 2810 2820 2960 140 4.96% 12 347 359 3179 13 277 290 3250 350 90.3% D202434.0 86 60001 CR951 Collier BoulevardDavis BoulevardRattlesnake Hammock Road 6D 602 E N 3,000 1490 1400 1660 260 18.57% 141 377 518 1918 209 297 5062166 834 72.2% C35.0 86 60001 CR951 Collier BoulevardRattlesnake Hammock Road US 41 (Tamiami Trail) 6D 603 E N 3,200 1770 1860 190040 2.15% 102 245 347 2207 195 143 338 2238 962 69.9% C36.1 12 64041 SR951 Collier BoulevardUS 41 (Tamiami Trail) Wal-Mart Driveway6D 557 E N 2,500 1581 1500 153030 2.00% 26 183 209 1709 111 127 238 1768732 70.7% C36.2 SR951 Collier BoulevardWal-Mart DrivewayManatee Road4D 557 D N 2,000 1734 1769 1530(239) -13.49%29 108 137 1906 123 104 227 1757 243 87.9% D202637.0 12 64041 SR951 Collier BoulevardManatee RoadMainsail Drive4D 627 D N 2,200 1560 1670 1770 100 5.99% 0 103 103 1773 68 103 171 1941 259 88.2% D202438.0 51 64041 SR951 Collier BoulevardMainsail DriveMarco Island Bridge4D 627 D N 2,200 1560 1670 1770 100 5.99% 0 31 31 1701 0 31 31 1801 399 81.9% D202839.0 64 99901 CR846 111th Avenue N.Gulfshore DriveVanderbilt Drive2U 585 D E 700 300 300 3066 2.00% 0 0 0 300 0 0 0 306 394 43.7% B40.0 1 60031 CR846 111th Avenue N.Vanderbilt DriveUS 41 (Tamiami Trail) 2U 613 D E 900 430 430 4399 2.09% 0 0 0 430 0 0 0 439 461 48.8% B41.1 6 66042 CR846 Immokalee RoadUS 41 (Tamiami Trail) Goodlette-Frank Road6D 566 E W 3,100 1910 2010 208070 3.48% 41 0 41 2051 175 0 175 2255 845 72.7% C41.2 6 66042 CR846 Immokalee RoadGoodlette-Frank Road Airport Road6D 625 E E 3,100 2520 2570 263060 2.33% 41 0 41 2611 45 0 45 2675 425 86.3% D 2023 202342.1 6 66042 CR846 Immokalee RoadAirport RoadLivingston Road6D 567 E W 3,100 2790 2790 2900 110 3.94% 5 0 5 2795 7 0 7 2907 193 93.8% D 2022 202242.2 6 66042 CR846 Immokalee RoadLivingston RoadI-756D/8D 679 E E 3,500 2460 2460 2580 120 4.88% 29 0 29 2489 49 0 49 2629 871 75.1% D43.1 8 66045 CR846 Immokalee RoadI-75Logan Boulevard6D/8D 568 E E 3,500 2410 2458 2390(68) -2.77%176 169 345 2803 410 170 580 2970 530 84.9% D202643.2 CR846 Immokalee RoadLogan BoulevardCollier Boulevard6D 656 E E 3,200 1960 1980 202040 2.02% 228 357 585 2565 741 251 992 3012 188 94.1% D202144.0 71 60018 CR846 Immokalee RoadCollier BoulevardWilson Boulevard6D 674 E E 3,300 1620 1620 1770 150 9.26% 282 265 547 2167 633 216 849 2619 681 79.4% D45.0 71 60018 CR846 Immokalee RoadWilson BoulevardOil Well Road6D 675 E E 3,300 1830 1890 2020 130 6.88% 224 205 429 2319 296 93 389 2409 891 73.0% C46.0 73 60165 CR846 Immokalee RoadOil Well RoadSR 292U 672 D E 900 370 390 41020 5.13% 29 102 131 521 122 46 168 578 322 64.2% C47.0 66 99903 Lake Trafford Road Carson RdSR 292U 609 D E 800 470 470 50030 6.38% 38 0 38 508 47 4 51 551 249 68.9% C48.0 60166 Logan BoulevardVanderbilt Beach Road Pine Ridge Road2U 587 D N 1,000 610 710 670(40) -5.63%16 19 35 745 14 19 33 703 297 70.3% C49.0 22 68051 Logan BoulevardPine Ridge RoadGreen Boulevard4D 588 D S 1,900 1410 1570 161040 2.55% 0 0 0 1570 0 0 0 1610 290 84.7% D 2023 202350.0 79 60166 Logan BoulevardImmokalee RoadVanderbilt Beach Road 2U 644 D N 1,000 590 560 57010 1.79% 0 30 30 590 29 30 59 629 371 62.9% C51.0 21 65041 CR881 Livingston RoadImperial StreetImmokalee Road6/4D 673 D N 3,000 1160 1180 126080 6.78% 99 0 99 1279 61 0 61 1321 1679 44.0% B52.0 57 62071 CR881 Livingston RoadImmokalee RoadVanderbilt Beach Road 6D 576 E N 3,100 1610 1610 164030 1.86% 38 0 38 1648 28 0 28 1668 1432 53.8% C53.0 58 62071 CR881 Livingston RoadVanderbilt Beach Road Pine Ridge Road6D 575 E S 3,100 1450 1480 149010 0.68% 18 0 18 1498 4 0 4 1494 1606 48.2% B54.0 52 60071 CR881 Livingston RoadPine Ridge RoadGolden Gate Parkway6D 690 E N 3,100 1470 1470 153060 4.08% 34 0 34 1504 46 0 46 1576 1524 50.8% B55.0 53 60061 CR881 Livingston RoadGolden Gate Parkway Radio Road6D 687 E N 3,000 1220 1270 133060 4.72% 39 0 39 1309 8 0 8 1338 1662 44.6% B58.0 67 99904 N. 1st StreetNew Market RoadSR-29 (Main Street)2U 590 D N 900 550 590 63040 6.78% 0 0 0 590 18 8 26 656 244 72.9% C59.0 New Market RoadBroward StreetSR 292U 612 D E 900 520 570 59020 3.51% 0 0 0 570 10 5 15 605 295 67.2% C61.0 36 Camp KeaisOil Well RoadImmokalee Road2U 626A D S 1,000 220 190 26070 36.84% 0 108 108 298 132 72 204 464 536 46.4% B62.0 68 99905 CR887 Old US 41Lee County LineUS 41 (Tamiami Trail) 2U 547 D N 1,000 960 1050 107020 1.90% 37 0 37 1087 40 0 40 1110(110)111.0% F Existing ExistingMASTER Attachment F-2018 (071218).xlsm Page 14 of 262 2016 2017 20182017 20172017 2018Traffic 1/7th TripPeak Hour Peak Peak Peak2018 20182017 1/7thVer. B2018 1/7th 1/7th TBCount BankPeak Dir Hour Hour Hour Actual Percent2017 1/7th Total 1/7th TB 2018 1/7th Total 1/7th TB2018 L Year YearExist Cnt. Min Peak Service Peak Dir Peak Dir Peak Dir Variation VariationTrip Trip Trip2017Trip Trip Trip2018 Remain.1/7th TBO Expected ExpectedID# CIE# Proj# Road# Link From To Road Sta. Std Dir Volume Volume Volume Volume To Volume To VolumeBank Bank BankVolumeBank Bank BankVolume Capacity V/C S Deficient Deficient45 45 5463.099924 CR896 Seagate DriveCrayton RoadUS 41 (Tamiami Trail) 4D 511 D E 1,700 970 970 106090 9.28% 0 0 0 970 0 0 0 1060 640 62.4% C64.0 14 69042 CR896 Pine Ridge RoadUS 41 (Tamiami Trail) Goodlette-Frank Road6D 512 E E 2,800 1870 1860 1990 130 6.99% 6 0 6 1866 6 0 6 1996 804 71.3% C65.0 14 69042 CR896 Pine Ridge RoadGoodlette-Frank Road Shirley Street6D 514 E W 2,800 1940 1970 198010 0.51% 1 0 1 1971 6 0 6 1986 814 70.9% C66.0 14 69042 CR896 Pine Ridge RoadShirley StreetAirport Road6D 515 E E 2,800 2250 2390 247080 3.35% 52 0 52 2442 24 0 24 2494 306 89.1% D202467.1 41 60111 CR896 Pine Ridge RoadAirport RoadLivingston Road6D 526 E E 3,000 2660 2550 261060 2.35% 35 0 35 2585 29 0 29 2639 361 88.0% D202567.2 41 60111 CR896 Pine Ridge RoadLivingston RoadI-756D 628 E E 3,000 2950 2990 303040 1.34% 103 0 103 3093 112 0 112 3142(142)104.7% F Existing Existing68.0 41 99907 CR896 Pine Ridge RoadI-75Logan Boulevard6D 600 E E 2,800 2130 2120 219070 3.30% 1 0 1 2121 1 0 1 2191 609 78.3% D69.0 15 65032 CR856 Radio RoadAirport RoadLivingston Road4D 544 D E 1,800 1120 1180 11800 0.00% 15 0 15 1195 3 0 3 1183 617 65.7% C70.0 15 65033 CR856 Radio RoadLivingston RoadSanta Barbara Boulevard 4D 527 D E 1,800 1110 1130 117040 3.54% 26 0 26 1156 6 0 6 1176 624 65.3% C71.0 16 65031 CR856 Radio RoadSanta Barbara Boulevard Davis Boulevard4D 685 D W 1,800 580 630 64010 1.59% 0 85 85 715 57 85 142 782 1018 43.4% B72.0 17 65021 CR864 Rattlesnake Hammock Road US 41 (Tamiami Trail) Charlemagne Boulevard 4D 516 D W 1,800 1010 1010 103020 1.98% 0 55 55 1065 132 11143 1173 627 65.2% C73.0 17 65021 CR864 Rattlesnake Hammock Road Charlemagne Boulevard County Barn Road4D 517 D W 1,800 700 740 83090 12.16% 0 48 48 788 108 11 119 949 851 52.7% B74.0 17 65021 CR864 Rattlesnake Hammock Road County Barn RoadSanta Barbara Boulevard 4D 534 D W 1,900 670 700 76060 8.57% 0 40 40 740 69 18 87 847 1053 44.6% B75.0 77 60169 CR864 Rattlesnake Hammock Road Santa Barbara Boulevard Collier Boulevard6D 518 E W 2,900 490 490 53040 8.16% 56 115 171 661 95 75 170 700 2200 24.1% B76.0 56 62081BSanta Barbara Boulevard Green BoulevardGolden Gate Parkway4D 529 D N 2,100 1240 1270 1240(30) -2.36%0 0 0 1270 0 0 0 1240 860 59.0% C77.0 56 62081ASanta Barbara Boulevard Golden Gate Parkway Radio Road6D 528 E N 3,100 1780 1810 188070 3.87% 54 0 54 1864 54 0 54 1934 1166 62.4% C78.0 56 62081ASanta Barbara Boulevard Radio RoadDavis Boulevard6D 537 E N 3,100 1290 1350 1450 100 7.41% 213 0 213 1563 221 0 221 1671 1429 53.9% C79.0Santa Barbara Boulevard Davis BoulevardRattlesnake-Hammock Road 6D 702 E S 3,100 930 890 95060 6.74% 112 0 112 1002 139 0 139 1089 2011 35.1% B80.0SR29 SR 29US 41 (Tamiami Trail) CR 837 (Janes Scenic Dr) 2U 615A D N 900 90 150 130(20) -13.33%0 0 0 150 0 0 0 130 770 14.4% B81.0SR29 SR 29CR 837 (Janes Scenic Dr) I-752U 615A D N 900 90 150 130(20) -13.33%0 0 0 150 0 0 0 130 770 14.4% B82.0SR29 SR 29I-75Oil Well Road2U 615A D N 900 90 150 130(20) -13.33%8 61 69 219 51 34 85 215 685 23.9% B83.0SR29 SR 29Oil Well RoadCR 29A South2U 665A D N 900 380 410 4100 0.00% 0 0 0 410 54 30 84 494 406 54.9% C84.0SR29 SR 29CR 29A South9th Street4D 664 D W 1,700 600 600 62020 3.33% 12 0 12 612 94 37 131 751 949 44.2% B85.0SR29 SR 299th StreetCR 29A North2U 663 D S 900 620 620 63010 1.61% 21 0 21 641 72 24 96 726 174 80.7% D86.0SR29 SR 29CR 29A NorthSR 822U 663 D S 900 620 620 63010 1.61% 0 0 0 620 50 23 73 703 197 78.1% D87.0SR29 SR 29Hendry County LineSR 822U 591A D S 800 350 360 37010 2.78% 0 0 0 360 7 4 11 381 419 47.6% B88.0SR82 SR 82Lee County LineSR 292U 661A D S 800 710 650 74090 13.85% 8 0 8 658 41 17 58 798 2 99.8% E 2022 201991.0 43US41 Tamiami Trail EastDavis BoulevardAirport Road6D 545 E E 2,900 1580 1700 1920 220 12.94% 23 47 70 1770 124 2 126 2046 854 70.6% C92.0 47US41 Tamiami Trail EastAirport RoadRattlesnake Hammock Road 6D 604 E E 2,900 2240 2300 2460 160 6.96% 13 248 261 2561 281 92 373 2833 67 97.7%E202093.0 46US41 Tamiami Trail EastRattlesnake Hammock Road Triangle Boulevard6D 572 E E 3,000 1960 1860 194080 4.30% 15 329 344 2204 474 158 632 2572 428 85.7% D 94.0US41 Tamiami Trail EastTriangle BoulevardCollier Boulevard6D 571 E E 3,000 1510 1620 170080 4.94% 0 203 203 1823 325 117 442 2142 858 71.4% C 95.1US41 Tamiami Trail EastCollier BoulevardJoseph Lane6D 608 D E 3,100 670 770 990 220 28.57% 134 107 241 1011 534 30 564 1554 1546 50.1% B95.2US41 Tamiami Trail EastJoseph LaneGreenway Road4D 608 D E 2,000 670 770 990 220 28.57% 53 102 155 925 53 93 146 1136 864 56.8% C95.3US41 Tamiami Trail EastGreenway RoadSan Marco Drive2U 608 D E 1,075 670 770 990 220 28.57% 53 4 57 827 84 1 85 1075 0 100.0% F 2021 201996.0US41 Tamiami Trail EastSan Marco DriveSR 292U 617A D E 1,000 140 240 200(40) -16.67%0 0 0 240 0 0 0 200 800 20.0% B97.0US41 Tamiami Trail EastSR 29Dade County Line2U 616A D E 1,000 150 210 170(40) -19.05%0 0 0 210 0 0 0 170 830 17.0% B98.0 71US41 Tamiami Trail North Lee County LineWiggins Pass Road6D 546 E N 3,100 1990 2090 2250 160 7.66% 97 8 105 2195 59 8 67 2317 783 74.7% C99.0 50US41 Tamiami Trail North Wiggins Pass RoadImmokalee Road6D 564 E N 3,100 2560 2890 3000 110 3.81% 29 8 37 2927 26 8 34 3034 66 97.9% E 2020 2020100.0 45US41 Tamiami Trail North Immokalee RoadVanderbilt Beach Road 6D 577 E N 3,100 2280 2320 1920(400) -17.24%18 0 18 2338 16 0 16 1936 1164 62.5% C101.0 45US41 Tamiami Trail North Vanderbilt Beach Road Gulf Park Drive6D 563 E N 3,100 2300 2330 2460 130 5.58% 3 0 3 2333 1 0 1 2461 639 79.4% D102.0US41 Tamiami Trail North Gulf Park DrivePine Ridge Road6D 562 E N 3,100 1860 1900 2010 110 5.79% 2 0 2 1902 2 0 2 2012 1088 64.9% C108.0Thomasson DriveBayshore DriveUS 41 (Tamiami Trail) 2U 698 D E 800 490 500 51010 2.00% 41 53 94 594 105 4 109 619 181 77.4% D109.0 42 65071 CR862 Vanderbilt Beach Road Gulfshore DriveUS 41 (Tamiami Trail) 2U/4D 524 E E 1,400 910 990 9900 0.00% 0 0 0 990 0 0 0 990 410 70.7% C110.1 23 67021 CR862 Vanderbilt Beach Road US 41 (Tamiami Trail) Goodlette-Frank Road4D 646 D E 1,900 1480 1540 1410(130) -8.44%0 0 0 1540 7 0 7 1417 483 74.6% C110.2 23 67021 CR862 Vanderbilt Beach Road Goodlette-Frank Road Airport Road4D/6D 666 D E 2,500 1700 1760 1750(10) -0.57%0 0 0 1760 7 0 7 1757 743 70.3% C111.1 63 63051 CR862 Vanderbilt Beach Road Airport RoadLivingston Road6D 579 E W 3,000 1850 1910 196050 2.62% 0 0 0 1910 4 0 4 1964 1036 65.5% C111.2 63 63051 CR862 Vanderbilt Beach Road Livingston RoadLogan Blvd.6D 668 E E 3,000 2000 2150 2070(80) -3.72%82 0 82 2232 71 0 71 2141 859 71.4% C112.0 24 63051 CR862 Vanderbilt Beach Road Logan BoulevardCollier Boulevard6D 580 E E 3,0001230 1530 1690 160 10.46% 260 2 262 1792 256 2 258 1948 1052 64.9% C114.0 25 69061 CR901 Vanderbilt DriveBonita Beach RoadWiggins Pass Road2U 548 D N 1,000 420 440 4499 2.05% 3 32 35 475 3 32 35 484 516 48.4% B115.0 69061 CR901 Vanderbilt DriveWiggins Pass Road111th Avenue2U 578 D N 1,000 440 440 4499 2.05% 3 13 16 456 3 13 16 465 535 46.5% B116.0 26 69021Westclox RoadCarson RoadSR 292U 611 D W 800 220 210 2100 0.00% 0 0 0 210 0 0 0 210 590 26.3% B117.0 99928 CR888 Wiggins Pass RoadVanderbilt DriveUS 41 (Tamiami Trail) 2U 669 D E 1,000 400 430 4399 2.09% 3 13 16 446 17 13 30 469 531 46.9% B118.0Wilson BlvdImmokalee RoadGolden Gate Boulevard 2U 650 D S 900 320 320 34020 6.25% 24 0 24 344 0 0 0 340 560 37.8% B119.0 60044 CR858 Oil Well RoadImmokalee RoadEverglades Boulevard4D 725S D E 2,000 600 700 850 150 21.43% 117 216 333 1033 225 62 287 1137 863 56.9% C120.0 60044 CR858 Oil Well RoadEverglades Boulevard Desoto Boulevard2U 694 D W 1,100 280 280 35070 25.00% 13 210 223 503 137 72 209 559 541 50.8% B121.1Oil Well RoadDeSoto BoulevardOil Well Grade2U 694 D W 1,100 280 280 35070 25.00% 0 209 209 489 124 62 186 536 564 48.7% B121.2Oil Well RoadOil Well GradeAve Maria Blvd4D 694 D W 2,000 280 280 35070 25.00% 0 209 209 489 124 62 186 536 1464 26.8% B122.0Oil Well RoadAve Maria BlvdSR 292U 694 D W 800 280 280 35070 25.00% 0 65 65 345 116 54 170 520 280 65.0% C123.0 60040Golden Gate Boulevard Wilson Boulevard18th Street NE/SE4U 652 D E 2,300 1080 1102 119088 8.02% 0 0 0 1102 10 5 15 1205 1095 52.4% B123.1 60040Golden Gate Boulevard 18th Street NE/SEEverglades Boulevard2U 4D652 D E 2,300 1080 1102 1190 88 8.02% 0 0 0 1102 0 5 5 1195 1105 52.0% B124.0 60040 Golden Gate Boulevard Everglades Boulevard DeSoto Boulevard 2U Manual D E 1,010 218 223 227 4 1.96% 0 0 0 223 0 0 0 227 783 22.5% B125.0 CR896 Pine Ridge Road Logan Boulevard Collier Boulevard 4D 535 D E 2,400 1290 1320 1340 20 1.52% 1 7 8 1328 0 7 7 1347 1053 56.1% C132.0 Randall Boulevard Immokalee Road Everglades Boulevard 2U 651 D E 900 850 870 820(50) -5.75%42 36 78 948 24 16 40 860 40 95.6% E 2023 2021133.0 Randall Boulevard Everglades Boulevard DeSoto Boulevard 2U Manual D E 900 614 626 639 13 2.02% 0 20 20 646 0 0 0 639 261 71.0% C134.0 Everglades Boulevard I-75 Golden Gate Blvd 2U 637S D S 800 410 430 450 20 4.65% 0 0 0 430 0 0 0 450 350 56.3% C135.0 Everglades Boulevard Golden Gate Boulevard Oil Well Road 2U 636S D N 800 310 280 310 30 10.71% 16 20 36 316 36 9 45 355 445 44.4% B136.0 Everglades Boulevard Oil Well Road Immokalee Road 2U 635S D N 800 390 410 450 40 9.76% 0 0 0 410 0 0 0 450 350 56.3% C137.0 DeSoto Boulevard I-75 Golden Gate Boulevard 2U 639A D S 800 140 140 150 10 7.14% 0 0 0 140 0 0 0 150 650 18.8% B138.0 DeSoto Boulevard Golden Gate Boulevard Oil Well Road 2U 638A D S 800 100 100 110 10 10.00% 0 0 0 100 8 0 8 118 682 14.8% B142.0 Orange Blossom Drive Goodlette-Frank Road Airport Road 2D 647 D W 1,200 600 540 400(140) -25.93%19 0 19 559 19 0 19 419 781 34.9% B143.0 Orange Blossom Drive Airport Road Livingston Road 2U 647 D W 1,000 600 540 400(140) -25.93%40 0 40 580 46 0 46 446 554 44.6% B144.0 Shadowlawn Drive US 41 (Tamiami Trail) Davis Boulevard 2U 523 D N 800 230 230 230 0 0.00% 0 0 0 230 0 0 0 230 570 28.8% BMASTER Attachment F-2018 (071218).xlsm Page 15 of 262 ID#2018 MapLast YearRoadway From ToTrip Bank (1/7th)Remaining CapacityV/CTCMA TCEAYear Expected DeficientExpected Def. last YearSolutions62.0 Old US 41 Lee County Line US 41 (Tamiami Trail) 0-110 111.0%NoExistingExisting Within the Northwest TCMA; Widen to 4-Lanes; PD&E Study Programmed by FDOT; Pursue Federal Funding67.2 Pine Ridge Road Livingston Road I-75 0-142 104.7%NoExistingExistingWithin the East Central TCMA; Congestion Corridor Study Complete, PE & CST for Pine Ridge Road @ Livingston programmed in CIE; Pursue state or federal funding for remainder of the corridor.ID# MapLast YearRoadway From ToTrip Bank (1/7th)Remaining CapacityV/CTCMA TCEAYear Expected DeficientExpected Def. last YearSolutions22.0 Golden Gate Parkway Santa Barbara Boulevard Collier Boulevard 8139 92.3%Yes20232023Within the East Central TCMA - Continue to Monitor and Review with Future I-75 Interchange Operation Analysis Report; Green Blvd. east of Logan being studied (FY2023) as a potential reliever.26.0 Goodlette-Frank Road Golden Gate Parkway US 41 (Tamiami Trail) 0220 91.9%Yes2023Continue to monitor; Pursue Detailed Operational Analysis if Warranted41.2 Immokalee Road Goodlette-Frank Road Airport Road 0425 86.3%Yes20232022Within the Northwest TCMA - Continue to Monitor & Pursue Detailed Capacity/Operational Analysis as warranted; Pursue parallel Roadway (Veteran's Memorial Blvd)42.1Immokalee Road Airport RoadLivingston Road0193 93.8%Yes20222023Within the Northwest TCMA - Continue to Monitor & Pursue Detailed Capacity/Operational Analysis as warranted; Pursue parallel Roadway (Veteran's Memorial Blvd)43.2Immokalee Road Logan BoulevardCollier Boulevard251188 94.1%Yes20212027 Pursue Detailed Capacity/Operational Analysis. Anticipate Future VBR Extension to Reduce Volumes49.0Logan Boulevard Pine Ridge RoadGreen Boulevard0290 84.7%Yes20232023 Within the East Central TCMA; Continue to Monitor88.0SR 82Lee County LineSR 29172 99.8%Yes20192027 Widen to 4-Ln; State Funded for CST 2019 & 202392.0Tamiami Trail East Airport RoadRattlesnake Hammock Road 9267 97.7%Yes20202024 Within the South US 41 TCEA; Continue to Monitor; Pursue Detailed Operational Analysis if Warranted95.3Tamiami Trail East Greenway RoadSan Marco Drive10 100.0%Yes20192024Greenway Rd to 6-L Farms Rd is funded thru CST in the MPO CFP (2031-2040); East of 6-L Farms RD is not expected to be deficient within the same time frame; Continue to Monitor; 99.0 Tamiami Trail North Wiggins Pass Road Immokalee Road 866 97.9%Yes20202020Within the Northwest TCMA; Proposed Veterans Memorial Blvd. will provide a connection to Livingston North/South that should provide additional relief; Continue to Monitor132.0 Randall Boulevard Immokalee Road Everglades Boulevard 1640 95.6%Yes2021Exist Immokalee Rd @ Randall Blvd Intersection Improvement PD&E Underway; Randall Blvd. Corridor Study UnderwayID# MapLast YearRoadway From ToTrip Bank (1/7th)Remaining CapacityV/CTCMA TCEAYear Expected DeficientExpected Def. last YearSolutions4.0 Airport Road Golden Gate Parkway Radio Road 0468 83.3%No20282027 Continue to Monitor & Pursue Detailed Capacity/Operational Analysis as warranted; 14.0 Davis Boulevard Lakewood Boulevard County Barn Road 0269 86.6%No20262027Within the East Central TCMA; Improvement is with a longer segment that is partially funded (R/W - 2031-40) in the MPO Cost Feasible Plan; Construction anticipated beyond 2040 (CST 2041-50); Continue to Monitor; 19.0 Golden Gate Parkway Goodlette-Frank Road Airport Road 0365 88.9%No20242027 Continue to Monitor & Pursue Detailed Capacity/Operational Analysis as warranted; 23.0 Goodlette-Frank Road Immokalee Road Vanderbilt Beach Road 0134 86.6%No20262019 Within the Northwest TCMA - Design/ROW/AdvCST/CST Programmed FY202333.0 Collier Boulevard I-75 Davis Boulevard 277350 90.3%Yes20242025 Continue to Monitor; Interchange Improvements Scheduled by FDOT 2020/2136.2 Collier Boulevard Wal-Mart Driveway Manatee Road 104243 87.9%No20262020 Widen to 6-Ln; PD&E completed; State Funded Improvement Proposed in MPO Cost Feasible Plan 2026-203037.0 Collier Boulevard Manatee Road Mainsail Drive 103259 88.2%No2024Continue to Monitor & Pursue Detailed Capacity/Operational Analysis as warranted; 38.0 Collier Boulevard Mainsail Drive Marco Island Bridge 31399 81.9%No2028Continue to Monitor & Pursue Detailed Capacity/Operational Analysis as warranted; 43.1 Immokalee Road I-75 Logan Boulevard 170530 84.9%No20262026Continue to Monitor; Interchange Improvements Proposed in MPO Cost Feasible Plan 2021-2025, Anticipate Future VBR Extension to Reduce Volumes66.0 Pine Ridge Road Shirley Street Airport Road 0306 89.1%Yes20242025 Within the Northwest TCMA; Continue to Monitor; Pursue Detailed Operational Analysis if Warranted67.1 Pine Ridge Road Airport Road Livingston Rd. 0361 88.0%Yes20252025 Within the East Central TCMA - Pursue Detailed Capacity/Operational Analysis and Alternative CorridorsDropped from the lists123.1 Exist Golden Gate Boulevard 18th Street NE/SE Everglades Boulevard 51105 52.0%NoExisting Last yearProgrammed for CST in the CIE20.2 2026 Golden Gate Parkway Livingston Road I-75 0690 79.1%No2026 last yearWithin the East Central TCMA - Continue to Monitor; Interchange Improvements Proposed in MPO Cost Feasible Plan 2021-2025Attachment "G"2018 AUIR Update Deficiencies Report2018 Existing Deficiencies Based on Traffic CountsProjected Deficiencies 2019-2023 (Traffic Counts + Trip Bank & 1/7th Vested Trips)Projected Deficiencies 2024-2028 (Traffic Counts + Trip Bank & 1/7th Vested Trips)Listed below are the roadway links that are currently deficient or are projected to be deficient under the concurrency system within the next five years and the programmed and proposed solutions to solve these deficienciesMASTER Attachment F-2018 (071218).1.xlsm Page 16 of 262 XXX!(!(!(!(!(COUNTY BARN RDYear Expected Deficient 2026Widen to 6-Ln; PD&E On-GoingPursue State Funding For ConstructionYear ExpectedDeficient 2020Northwest TCMAEVERGLADES BLVDYear Expected Deficient 2024Year Expected Deficient2023 / East Central TCMAPD&E Programmed(FY2019)Pursue State FundingIMMOKALEE ROADYear ExpectedDeficient 2025East Central TCMABridge at 8th St. NE Immokalee Rd &Randall IntersectionPD & E UnderwayCorridor Study UnderwayYear Expected Deficient: 2021Year Expected Deficient 2026Year ExpectedDeficient 2026Northwest TCMAYear ExpectedDeficient 2024Northwest TCMAEast Central TCMA;Congestion Corridor StudyComplete, PE & CST for PineRidge Road @ Livingston programmed in CIE; Pursuestate or federal funding for remainder of the corridor.Logan Blvd N.(By Others)Immokalee/951 Intersection (2015/16)Tree Farm/Woodcrest(By Others)Bridge at 47th Ave. NE ROW: FY2018Design & Mitigation: FY2020Construction: FY2022Wilson/Blackburn(By Others)City Gate Blvd. N(By Others)Year Expected Deficient 2020South US 41 TCEADesign/Build: Under ConstructionYear Expected Deficient 2024Year ExpectedDeficient 2023Northwest TCMAYear ExpectedDeficient 2021Bridges at 16th St. NEDesign & Mitigation: FY2019Construction: FY2021Vanderbilt Beach Rd. Ext.New 3-Lane (of future 6-Lane)Roadway to Relieve Congestion on Immokalee Rd and Golden Gate Blvd.Design: FY2018ROW & Mitigation: FY2019Construction: FY2021Vanderbilt Beach Rd.Widen to 6-LanesConstruction: FY2021Veterans Memorial BlvdNew 2-Lane Roadway to Relieve Immokalee Rd. CongestionConstruction: FY 2022VETERANS MEMORIALBLVDYear Expected Deficient 2019Continue to MonitorYear Expected Deficient 2023Continue to MonitorEast Central TCMAYear Expected Deficient 2028Continue to MonitorYear Expected Deficient 2026Continue to MonitorYear Expected Deficient 2022Northwest TCMAIntersection ImprovementsROW & Construction: FY2018Intersection ImprovementsStudy & ROW: FY2019Construction: 2022Intersection ImprovementsDesign: FY2019ROW: FY2020Adv. Construction: FY2022 & 2023Wilson BenfieldStudy/PE: FY2018Adv. ROW: FY2021 & 2022 & 2023Orange BlossomWiden to 4-LanesStudy: FY2018Design: FY2019ROW: FY2021Construction: 2022I-75I-75I-75I-75Intersection Improvements (FDOT)Design: FY2021ROW: FY2018-2020Construction: FY2021Mitigation: FY2018, FY2020-2021Whippoorwill Ln/Marbella Lakes Blvd. InterconnectionConstruction: 2020Expected Deficient: 2023Manatee Rd to Mainsail Dr.Year Expected Deficient 2024Oil Well RoadAdv.Construction:2020-2023$LUSRUW3XOOLQJ Rd.Design: FY2023ROW: FY2023Adv. CST: FY2023CST: FY2023Collier BOYG - Widen to 6-lanesDesign: FY2023ROW: FY2023AGv. CST: FY2023Green Blvd.Widen to 4lanesStudy: FY2023SR 29COLLIER BLVDOIL WELL RDTAMIAMI TRL NDAVIS BLVDGOODLETTE FRANK RDRADIO RDIMMOKALEE RD EVANDERBILT DRVANDERBILT BEACH RDPINE RIDGE RDGREEN BLVDGOLDEN GATE BLVDOLD US 41TAMIAMI TRL ETAMIAMI TRL EOIL WELL RDGOLDEN GATE PKWYRATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK RDAIRPORT PULLING RDLIVINGSTON RDWILSON BLVDCAMP KEAIS RDDESOTO BLVDSANTA BARBARA BLVDVANDERBILT BEACH RD EXT.RANDALL BLVDCOLLIER BLVDBONITA BEACH RDSR 82LAKE TRAFFORD RDCORKSCREW RDWESTCLOX STW Main STSR 29Year Expected Deficient 2019 Widen to 4-Ln; State SIS Funding:CST 2019 & 2023 INSET MAP 1LAKETRAFFORDPROJECTED COLLIER COUNTY DEFICIENT ROADS024681MilesGIS MAPPING: BETH YANG, AICPGROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENTFILE: 2018 Attachment H.mxdGROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENTTRANSPORTATION PLANNINGFY 2018 - FY 2028ATTACHMENT HG U L FOFME X I C O LegendCapacity Enhancement ProjectExisting DeficiencyProjected Deficiency < 5 YearsProjected Deficiency 5 to 10 YearsTCMA/TCEA BoundarySan Marco RDBald Eagle DR llier BLVD INSET MAP 2Manatee Rd to Maindail Dr. - Year Expected Deficient 2024Mainsail Dr. to Marco Island Bridge - Year Expected Deficient 2028¯Page 17 of 262 TCMA ReportCollier County Transportation Concurrency Management SystemAUIR ID Street Name From ToPkHr-PkDir(1)V/C RatioLength #Lanes Lane MilesLane Miles @ VC <= 1.00East Central TCMA31.1 Collier Boulevard Pine Ridge Road Green Boulevard 0.62 1.04 6 6.24 6.2432.2 Collier Boulevard Golden Gate Pwky Golden Gate Main Canal 0.69 1.01 4 4.04 4.0432.3 Collier Boulevard Golden Gate Main Canal I-75 0.47 0.65 8 5.20 5.2033.0 Collier Boulevard I-75 Davis Boulevard 0.90 0.56 8 4.47 4.4714.0 Davis Boulevard Lakewood Boulevard County Barn Road 0.87 1.71 4 6.83 6.8315.0 Davis Boulevard County Barn Road Santa Barbara Boulevard 0.75 0.75 4 3.02 3.0216.1 Davis Boulevard Santa Barbara Boulevard Radio Rd. 0.29 2.62 6 15.71 15.7116.2 Davis Boulevard Radio Rd. Collier Boulevard 0.43 2.32 6 13.93 13.9320.2 Golden Gate Parkway Livingston Rd. I-75 0.79 1.97 6 11.8 11.8221.0 Golden Gate Parkway I-75 Santa Barbara Boulevard 0.65 1.01 6 6.07 6.0722.0 Golden Gate Parkway Santa Barbara Boulevard Collier Boulevard 0.92 2.21 4 8.84 8.8427.0 Green Boulevard Santa Barbara Boulevard Collier Boulevard 0.76 1.99 2 3.99 3.9954.0 Livingston Road Pine Ridge Road Golden Gate Parkway 0.51 2.60 6 15.59 15.5955.0 Livingston Road Golden Gate Parkway Radio Road 0.45 1.41 6 8.49 8.4949.0 Logan Boulevard Pine Ridge Road Green Boulevard 0.85 0.88 4 3.53 3.5367.2 Pine Ridge Road Livingston Rd. I-75 1.05 2.20 6 13.20 0.0068.0 Pine Ridge Road I-75 Logan Boulevard 0.78 0.99 6 5.97 5.97125.0 Pine Ridge Road Logan Boulevard Collier Boulevard 0.56 1.88 4 7.53 7.5370.0 Radio Road Livingston Road Santa Barbara Boulevard 0.65 2.00 4 7.98 7.9871.0 Radio Road Santa Barbara Boulevard Davis Boulevard 0.43 1.34 4 5.36 5.3676.0 Santa Barbara Boulevard Green Boulevard Golden Gate Parkway 0.59 1.70 4 6.81 6.8177.0 Santa Barbara Boulevard Golden Gate Parkway Radio Road 0.62 1.40 6 8.43 8.4378.0 Santa Barbara Boulevard Radio Road Davis Boulevard 0.54 1.05 6 6.32 6.3235.32 179.37 166.17Total Lane Miles: 179.37Lane Miles <=1.00 V/C: 166.17(1) V/C Ratio based upon Total Traffic, including Traffic Counts + Trip Bank + 1/7th Vested TripsPercent Lane Miles Meeting Standard:92.6%AttachmentIMASTER Attachment F-2018 (071218).xlsmPage 18 of 262 APPENDIX G COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN TRANSPORTION ELEMENT COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT Prepared by Collier County Planning and Zoning Department Comprehensive Planning Section Prepared for COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Adopted October, 1997 i AMENDMENTS TO COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT SYMBOL DATE AMENDED ORDINANCE NO. October 28, 1997 1997-62 ** (I) February 23, 1999 1999-13 (II) May 9, 2000 2000-32 (III) November 19, 2002 2002-60 (IV) December 16, 2003 2003-67 (V) October 26, 2004 2004-71 (VI) January 25, 2007 2007-08 *** (VII) December 4, 2007 2007-80 (VIII) October 14, 2008 2008-59 (IX) January 8, 2013 2013-04 **** (X) January 27, 2015 2015-11 (XI) June 13, 2017 2017-25 The parenthesized Roman numeral symbols enumerated above appear throughout this Element and provide informational citations to adopted documents recorded in the Official Records of Collier County, as required by Florida law. These symbols are for informational purposes only, meant to mark entries amended after the 1997 adoption of the full Element and typically found in the margins of this document, but are not themselves adopted. * Indicates adopted portions. ** This is the EAR-based amendment (1996 EAR). Due to the magnitude of the changes ‒ which included reformatting the entire Element, affecting every page of the Element ‒ a Roman numeral is not assigned. *** Based on the 2004 Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR). **** Based on 2011 Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR). ii AMENDMENTS TO COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN – prior to 1997 TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT DATE AMENDED ORDINANCE NO. February 5, 1991 91-15 May 19, 1992 92-34 August 4, 1992 92-50 May 25, 1993 93-24 April 12, 1994 94-22 March 14, 1995 95-12 Note: All of the above amendments occurred after adoption of the Growth Management Plan in 1989 (Ord. No. 89-05) and prior to adoption of amendments in 1997 that were subsequently re-adopted in 2000. Due to a significant re-formatting/re-organization of the Transportation Element, these amendments are no longer denoted on the pages of the Element with Roman numeral symbols. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION Page A. FUTURE SYSTEM NEEDS 1 1. Travel Demand 2. Traffic Circulation Constraints 3. Five Year Capital Facility Program 4. Future Traffic Circulation Map Series - Year 2025 B. INTERMODAL & MULTI-MODAL TRANSPORTATION 2 1. Non-motorized Travel 2. Aviation 3. Mass Transit C. PERSPECTIVES 6 1. Land Use Issues 2. Marco Island Airport Impacts 3. Inter-agency Coordination Cooperation 4. Funding of Roadway Improvements D. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY * 7 E. GOALS, OBJECTIVES & POLICIES * 10 iv LIST OF TABLES/MAPS/FIGURES MAP TR–1 * Cost Feasible Network Map ‒ Year 2040 27 TR–2 * Needs Assessment Projects Map ‒ Year 2040 28 TR–3 * Collier 2013 Functional Classification – Countywide Map 29 TR–3.1 * Collier 2013 Functional Classification – Inset Map (Coastal North) 30 TR–3.2 * Collier 2013 Functional Classification – Inset Map (Orangetree Area) 31 TR–3.3 * Collier 2013 Functional Classification – Inset Map (Immokalee Area) 32 TR–3.4 * Collier 2013 Functional Classification – Inset Map (Coastal Central) 33 TR–3.5 * Collier 2013 Functional Classification – Inset Map (Coastal South – Marco Island Area) 34 TR–4 * South US 41 Transportation Concurrency Exception Area (TCEA) Map 35 TR–5 * Northwest Transportation Concurrency Management Area (TCMA) Map 36 TR–6 * East Central Transportation Concurrency Management Area (TCMA) Map 37 TR–7 * Collier County Hurricane Evacuation Routes Map 38 TR‒8 * Strategic Intermodal System (SIS) Facilities Map 39 TR‒9 * Regional Transportation Network Map 40 Transportation Element as of Ordinance No. 2017-25 adopted June 13, 2017 1 (III) A. FUTURE SYSTEM NEEDS (III)(V)(IX)(XI) 1. Travel Demand The Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan’s Cost Feasible Plan and Needs Assessment Plan as adopted on December 11, 2015 are hereby incorporated to define the major roadway needs for Collier County. The 2040 Cost Feasible Plan is presented as Map TR‒1 and shows the needed roadway improvements that can be funded through the year 2040. Map TR‒2 shows the total projected roadway improvements needed by 2040. While the total 2040 needs are estimated to require funding of approximately 2.3 billion dollars, the cost feasible plan reflects funding of approximately 1.2 billion dollars. Map TR–3 and Inset Maps TR‒3.1 through TR‒3.5 show the existing functional classification of roadways in the County. The refinement of these maps to incorporate updates to the MPO’s Plan, development of a collector road system and results of corridor specific studies, shall occur on a regular basis upon approval of the Collier County Board of County Commissioners (BCC). (III) 2. Traffic Circulation Constraints In many parts of the Naples Urban Area, traffic circulation movements are constrained by the natural features of the landscape such as the Gordon River. Still other parts offer constraints of the man-made variety, such as golf courses and the Naples Airport. In many instances approved developments (some existing, others not yet built) block the way of l ogical extensions of urban collector and arterial roads. The single most noticeable constraint is the Gordon River as it extends from the Naples Bay northward under the East Tamiami Trail (US 41) to its connection with the Golden Gate canal system. (X) The characteristics of the highway network at this location resemble an "hour-glass". On the western extreme, US 41 and Goodlette Road converge on the narrow "straits" of the Gordon River bridge; while to the east, US 41 and Davis Boulevard do likewise. The result is the typical "bottleneck" effect when too much traffic volume is forced through a constricted area. The other contributing factor to current and future congestion problems is associated with the northwest/southeast configuration of the East Trail (US 41). Because this roadway converges with the east/west and north/south roadways at an angle it has the impact of forcing or "squeezing" the travel demand into the confined area of the Gordon River corridor. This one roadway serves both the north/south and the east/west travel demand in the East Naples area. Travelers at the southeastern corner of the Urban Area have only one route into the central City of Naples, i.e., the East Trail, whereas travelers in the northeast reaches of the Urban Area have a multitude of choices along the roadway grid for a route to downtown Naples. In developing plans for new and expanded roadways that make up the long range network, the County has kept in view these natural and man-made traffic circulation constraints. Even though environmental concerns are usually addressed through the permitting process, it is important to consider various highway alternatives in light of the sometimes fragile ecological features. (XI) = Plan Amendment by Ordinance No. 2017-25 on June 13, 2017 Transportation Element as of Ordinance No. 2017-25 adopted June 13, 2017 2 (II)(III)(IX)(XI) 3. Five-year Capital Facility Program The Collier County Transportation Work Program is reported annually in the Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR) for future five-year planning periods. The improvements shown in the AUIR represent a sub-set of the needs identified in the Collier County 2040 Needs Assessment Projects (Map TR–2) and are included in the current Capital Improvement Element (CIE) Schedule of Capital Improvements, as amended annually, for funding within the next five years. (II)(III)(IX)(XI) 4. Traffic Circulation Map Series – Section 163.3177(6)(b)(1), Florida Statutes requires a map or map series showing the general location of the existing and proposed transportation system features. This map series present the following: number of future funded road lanes and other improvements; roadway functional classifications; and multi-modal facilities (ports, airports, and rail lines). Map TR–1, the 2040 Cost Feasible Network, shows the funded road improvements through 2040, including number of road lanes, sidewalks and bike lanes. Map TR‒3 shows the existing roadway functional classifications, and Map TR‒8 shows the multi-modal facilities in the County. (III)(XI) B. INTERMODAL & MULTI-MODAL TRANSPORTATION 1. Non-Motorized Travel Today in Collier County, there exists the potential for an integrated network of bicycle and pedestrian facilities that would provide a safe, clean, healthy, and efficient opportunity for travel throughout the urban area. To help create a more balanced and livable transportation system, one that provides for bicycling and walking, Collier County has undertaken new roles a nd responsibilities not previously performed. The Collier County Comprehensive Pathway Plan, developed by the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) staff, was adopted by the MPO in December, 1994. The purpose of the Pathway Plan is to plan for the future needs of bicyclists, pedestrians and other non-motorized travel modes. The Plan is a tool to guide the MPO’s Bicycle/Pedestrian Program within six essential areas: (1) establishment; (2) engineering; (3) education; (4) enforcement; (5) encouragement; and (6) economics. These interrelated areas address Collier County’s non- motorized issues, constraints, needs and opportunities. The Pathway Plan is currently being implemented in Collier County. The Pathway Plan documents the extent of the existing pathway system. Many of the major highways have sidewalks incorporated into their design. It is a policy of this plan that all future capacity improvements described in this plan shall include provisions for both bicycles and pedestrians. In addition, the Subdivision Regulations of Collier County provide for bicycle and pedestrian facilities throughout a development. The 2020 Pathway Plan also provides for the systematic completion of an integrated system . It is a policy of this Plan that Collier County will annually adopt a 5 Year Pathway Work Program that establishes pathway priorities. The County, to the greatest extent possible, will identify state and federal funds and provide local funds for the implementation of the 5 Year Pathway Work Program. In addition to providing bicycle and pedestrian facilities, the County will encourage their use, and promote safe bicycle and pedestrian practices through the continued support and implementation of the Comprehensive Pathway Plan. (XI) = Plan Amendment by Ordinance No. 2017-25 on June 13, 2017 Transportation Element as of Ordinance No. 2017-25 adopted June 13, 2017 3 (III) 2. Aviation Airport Master Plans were prepared for the Immokalee Regional Airport, Everglades Airpark, and the Marco Island Executive Airport. These plans provide insight as to existing facilities and conditions and make recommendations regarding potential opportunities and necessary future facilities at the three airports. a. Existing Facilities The development of separate master plans for Immokalee Regional Airport, Everglades Airpark, and Marco Island Executive Airport required the collection and evaluation of information relative to each of the airports and surrounding areas including the following: • Physical inventories and descriptions of facilities and services currently provided by each of the airports • Background information pertaining to aircraft fleet mix and historical activity levels • Regional plans and studies potentially affecting future airport development activity Immokalee Regional Airport: The airport is located on a 1,100 acre site in the north - central part of the County, approximately 40 miles nor theast of Naples. Located on the northeast side of Immokalee, the airport is only one mile from the Central Business District. Primary access to the airport is via State Route 29 to County Route 846, which intersects with Airpark Boulevard to the south of the airport. Little development has occurred at the airport since its transfer of ownership in 1960 from the United States Government. Both landside and airside facilities are located at the airport. Landside facilities include the aircraft storage hangars, fueling facilities, etc. Airside facilities included at Immokalee are three runways, each 5,000 feet long and 150 feet wide. Taxiways are available as well. The airside facilities presently available provide for opportunities that are not available at other general aviation airports within the County. The three 5,000 foot runways and pavement strength provide operational capability exceeded only by Naples Municipal Airport. Additionally, only a portion of the 1,100 acres at the Immokalee Regional Airport is currently being used for airfield purposes. Large tracts of land remain available for future development of additional landside facilities and future economic development activity. Everglades Airpark: Everglades Airpark was initially purchased and developed by Collier County in 1968. The airport purchase was funded through monetary assistance provided by the Federal Aviation Administration, a National Park Grant, and Collier County. Little development has taken place since its opening, other than the required maintenance projects. Situated outside the boundaries of Everglades National Park and the Big Cypress National Preserve, the airport is surrounded on three sides by water. The airport is immediately surrounded by lands zoned as areas of environmental concern. Facilities at Everglades Airpark include a single runway that is 50 feet wide and 2,400 feet long, a taxiway, and runway lighting. Parking facilities, fueling and hangar facilities are also available. A terminal building/pilots lounge has been recently constructed, which provides a number of services. Marco Island Executive Airport: In the late 1960’s, plans for a resort-oriented area south of Naples were conceived. Deltona, the developer of the Marco Shores project, determined that along with the upscale resort area, an airport was needed capable of accommodating small air carrier and general aviation aircraft. Construction of the airport began in 1972, and was completed in 1976. Through a land swap with the State of Florida, the County recently acquired the airport property in exchange for property within the Fakahatchee Strand. (III) = Plan Amendment by Ordinance No. 2002-60 on November 19, 2002 Transportation Element as of Ordinance No. 2017-25 adopted June 13, 2017 4 Existing airfield facilities include one runway, which is 5,000 feet long and 100 feet wide, a taxiway, various navigational aids, as well as airfield lighting. Automobile parking facilities are available adjacent to the terminal building. b. Future Potential Opportunities Immokalee Regional Airport: According to the Immokalee Regional Airport Master Plan, a number of factors support the notion that this airport could become a regional airline/aircraft maintenance base in the future. The length, width, and pavement strength of the existing airfield is capable of accommodating nearly all of the aircraft in the national regional airline fleet. There is ample open land available for future development of additional hangar space. The establishment of the airport in conjunction with the Southwest Florida International Airport as a Foreign Trade Zone (FTZ) could provide some opportunities for expanded air cargo operations. The Immokalee Regional Airport can offer space for industrial development and warehousing taking advantage of the FTZ. Such services could involve turbo-prop, business jet, or even smaller commercial jet activity. Additionally, the shipping of fresh produce from the airport may be a possibility. Considering the large agricultural base in the Immokalee area, specialty produce opportunities could be developed for movement by air to restaurants and retailers within the region, or nationally. The regional climate may offer an incentive as well for future flight training facilities . The weather in Southwest Florida is ideal for training operations. The airport has the land area available on site to support this type of operation and development of the necessary hangar and terminal facilities. Everglades Airpark: Land and environmental constraints at the Everglades Airpark provide little in the way of increased operations. The general intent of the Everglades Airpark Master Plan is demand-based rather than time-based. This means that reasonable levels of activity potential that are derived from this forecasting effort will be related to planning levels rather than dates in time. The demand levels, combined with airfield limitations suggest that the Airpark will continue to serve primarily single engine and twin-engine piston aircraft. The waters surrounding Everglades Airpark are currently utilized by seaplanes. The waters surrounding the Airpark provide a unique opportunity to increase seaplane operations, by providing daily sight-seeing flights and overnight excursions to coastal areas with campground facilities. Marco Island Executive Airport: According to the Marco Island Executive Airport Master Plan, Collier County Airport Authority should continue its efforts on operating the airport as an attractive, efficient, and safe facility. It was recommended that the Airport Authority continue to market and develop the airport as a facility to serve primarily corporate type aircraft indicative of the visitor and resident clientele of the Marco Island Area, and attract and maintain scheduled commuter service for the community. (III) c. Estimated Development Timelines and Costs The development timelines and costs are included in the Master Plans for each of the airports. The short term planning horizon covers items of highest priority as well as items that should be developed as the airport approaches the short term activity milestones. Priority items include improvements to safety and pavement maintenance. Also included, (III) = Plan Amendment by Ordinance No. 2002-60 on November 19, 2002 Transportation Element as of Ordinance No. 2017-25 adopted June 13, 2017 5 are improvements to facilities that are inadequate for present demand. Because of their priority, those items will need to be incorporated into County, State, and FAA programming. When short term horizon activity levels are reached, it will then be time to program for the intermediate term based upon the next activity milestones. Similarly, when the intermediate term milestones are reached, it will then be time to program for the long range. The cost estimates within each of the airport master plans were increased by 30% in order to allow for engineering and other contingencies that may be experienced by the project. (III) 3. Mass Transit a. Purpose Collier County initiated deviated fixed route service for public transportation on February 15, 2001. (II) Private services offered in the County are fixed route "trolleys" which operate during the winter season in Naples and on Marco Island, and a network of para-transit providers that offer transportation services to the disadvantaged. (II)(XI) The Transportation Disadvantaged (TD) program is coordinated by Collier County, which has been designated as the Coordinated Provider by the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO). The TD services offer home pick-up and delivery transportation for the elderly, handicapped, and economically disadvantaged in the County. The "trolley" systems mentioned above are run primarily for the tourist segment of the population and have fixed routes that visit the major shopping, beach and hotel interest points. (II) b. Future System Needs On August 3, 1999 the Board of County Commissioners adopted the Public Transportation Development Plan (PTDP), and agreed to become the Governing Agency for Transit in Collier County. The PTDP contains estimates of un-met need in Collier County, both for the existing TD services, and for general public transportation. It contains planning level discussions on demand centers, route locations, vehicle sizes and types of services. (II) The Public Transportation Operating Plan (PTOP) was adopted by the MPO on December 8, 2000 and by the Collier County Board of County Commissioners on January 9, 2001. The PTOP, and future updates, are hereby incorporated by reference. Other services proposed in the start up public transportation system are a vanpool program, circulator service in Immokalee, an Immokalee to Naples shuttle service, and a Commuter Assistance Program. Although the PTPD final report suggested the need for numerous public transportation services in Collier County, the scale and growth rate of the initial system was such that no local funding contribution was predicted to be required until fiscal year 2006. This situation is the result of gradual changes in the requirements for local matching funds that accompany state and federal grant funds. Collier County is already spending funds on public transportation that meet the match requirements. (XI) = Plan Amendment by Ordinance No. 2017-25 on June 13, 2017 Transportation Element as of Ordinance No. 2017-25 adopted June 13, 2017 6 (III) C. PERSPECTIVES 1. Land Use Issues (VI) The Transportation Element is closely related to the Future Land Use Element. It has long been the pattern that the development of land necessitates improvements and expansion to the transportation system. The two elements are so closely tied, in fact, that changes or shifts in the land use patterns can drastically impact the performance of the roadway system. It is for that reason that the County requires most land development proposals (e.g., DRI, rezone and conditional use requests) to submit a Traffic Impact Statement. An analysis of the proposal’s impact is prepared and submitted to the recommending and approving authorities. As an alternative to this pattern of demand driving the transportation system improvements, the County has begun to explore ways to have the roadway system guide the patterns and densities of development. The County can determine the type of roadway system it wishes to maintain at the adopted level of service and then take steps to permit the type of land uses that will be consistent with that system. In this way, the County will be in a better position to keep the demand for transportation services from outstripping the supply of the roadway system. (VI) The County has also recognized the importance of good site planning as it relates to a project’s ingress and egress from the major roadway system. Inadequate control of access points, median openings and signalized intersections can accelerate the deterioration of the systems overall level of service just as fast as the increases in traffic volumes. The County has developed and adopted policies to control the number, location and type of access points to the road network. These policies are based on the Collier County Access Control Policy (Resolution No. 92-42) and follow- up Resolution No. 01-247, and existing road and land use conditions, and are outlined in Section 4.04.02 of the Land Development Code. (VI) 2. Marco Island Airport Impacts The Marco Island Airport, located east of SR-951 approximately 4.5 miles south of US 41 is a facility having a runway length of approximately 5,000 feet. Access to the facility is from SR-951 via Mainsail Drive. The facility currently provides only general aviation services to the southern urban area. Adjacent to the air strip is the Marco Shores Golf Club Community consisting of a golf course and a phase one residential area of 240 condominium units. All other lands surrounding the facility are under State ownership and are environmentally sensitive. Peak season-peak hour traffic counts taken in 1988 at the intersection of Mainsail Drive at SR-951 reveal 120 vehicles using Mainsail Drive during the period of 8:00 a.m. and 10:00 a.m. This count would include both residential and airport generated traffic. A 1985 analysis of Marco Island Airport operation is part of the Continuing Florida Aviation System Plan indicates the following current conditions: In 1994, Marco Island Airport had approximately 30 based aircraft with 15,000 annual general aviation operations. By 2005, the facility is expected to have 35 based aircraft and 21,000 annual operations. The airport has been served by regional airlines in the past. If commercial commuter service was ever resumed it could be expected to generate an additional 8.000 operations per year by 2005. The current limited use of this publicly owned facility places no significant impact on SR-951. (VI) = Plan Amendment by Ordinance No. 2007-08 on January 25, 2007 Transportation Element as of Ordinance No. 2017-25 adopted June 13, 2017 7 (III)(XI) 3. Inter-agency Coordination In Collier County, the responsibility for providing transportation facilities rests with several different agencies. Long-range transportation planning is the primary charge of the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO). The MPO staff is housed in the Transportation Services Division, Transportation Planning Department. The Collier County Transportation Planning Department provides staff services to the MPO. The MPO coordinates its planning activities with the City, County, and State Department of Transportation. The programming and construction activities are handled by the City of Naples, City of Marco Island, Collier County, and the Florida Department of Transportation. Each agency's construction programs are monitored by the MPO to ensure inter-agency consistency. (III) 4. Funding of Roadway Improvements In Collier County the pursuit of additional funding for roadway improvements has led to the implementation of numerous funding alternatives. The County has adopted the maximum allowable local option gas taxes in addition to a one-cent voted gas tax. Impact fees for roadway construction were initiated in 1985 and up-dated in 2000, and 2002. Municipal Service Taxing Units have been used to implement area specific projects. On the State level, local governments through the Metropolitan Planning Organization have directed their attention to the under-funded State roads in Collier County. One of the MPO's roles is to ensure that local governments in its jurisdiction direct equitable state and federal funding to the highest priority projects. (III) D. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY (III) As part of the Transportation Element, the County established minimum acceptable level of service standards on the existing highway system. For County facilities, the level of service standard to be maintained is “D” or “E” as measured on a peak hour basis. Several County and State facilities have been given a minimum LOS “E” standard. (III) To maintain the adopted LOS on roadways, the County has implemented a concurrency management regulatory program that ties issuance of development orders to the demonstration of adequate capacity on all roadway segments that would be significantly impacted by new development. In summary this program maintains an inventory of the following for each arterial and collector roadway segment: • Actual traffic on each segment as determined through an annual traffic counting program. • The peak hour service capacity as determined by engineering analyses performed by the Transportation Division, and • Capacity that will be used by new development for which a Certificate of Adequate Public Facilities has been issued. (III)(VI) In order to prevent sudden unanticipated LOS failures, the County adopted a “real time” “checkbook accounting” concurrency management process on February 11, 2004. (III)(VI) See the Adequate Public Facilities Requirements (Sections 6.02.00 and 10.02.07 of the Land Development Code) for details of this process. 1. Monitoring (VI) Section 6.02.00 of the Land Development Code is also known as the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Requirements. It describes the annual count program done on County roads to determine their annual average daily traffic (AADT). It describes how the relationship between that AADT and the segment’s adopted level of service (LOS) standard determines the road segment’s level of service. (XI) = Plan Amendment by Ordinance No. 2017-25 on June 13, 2017 Transportation Element as of Ordinance No. 2017-25 adopted June 13, 2017 8 (III) The current levels of service at which road segments are operating are reported annually in the Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR). This report indicates which segments are operating at levels of service worse than their adopted standard LOS. It also contains predictions of when certain segments will reach levels of service that exceed their adopted standard LOS. Although traffic volumes are expressed as AADT, LOS calculations are done to ensure adequate levels of service. Peak season, peak hour traffic conditions are skewed in Collier County because of the heavy influx of seasonal residents and tourists. As such, it is deemed an inappropriate and unreasonable imposition on taxpayers to provide a roadway system designed for the peak of the peak season. Therefore, the LOS calculations are based on traffic conditions experienced for 10 months of the year with the peak seasonal and tourist months of February and March omitted from the analysis. 2. LOS Determination and BCC Findings (III) The annual average daily volumes will be calculated and the peak hour volume interpreted based upon the available data consistent with omitting February and March tourist months from the analysis. The Transportation Division shall maintain and update a list of all roadway segments, for which a level of service standard has been adopted, that shows the current LOS as well as the adopted LOS standard found in this plan. (III) If the volume of traffic of any segment is found to exceed its adopted LOS, a report of the Division’s findings will be transmitted to the Board of County Commissioners. The APFO describes the consequences of a road segment operating at a LOS that exceeds its adopted LOS standard. (III) 2.1 Constrained Roadways Constrained facilities are roadways which have been designated by action of the Board of County Commissioners once it has been determined that the facility will not be expanded by two or more through lanes due to physical, environmental or policy constraints. Physical constraints primarily occur when a roadway is developed to the maximum six lane standard or when intensive land use development is immediately adjacent to roads, thus making expansion co st prohibitive. Environmental and policy constraints primarily occur when decisions are made not to expand a road based on environmental, historical, archaeological, aesthetic or social impact considerations. Constrained roadways are identified by action of the BCC upon the recommendation of the Transportation Administrator. Roadways identified as constrained shall be subject to growth restrictions such that further LOS degradation does not occur once the roadway is determined to be operating below Level -of- Service standard. Constrained roadways are subject to growth restrictions that only allow for an increase in annual daily traffic volume of 10% above the service volume at Level -of-Service standard resulting in LOS operations not to exceed 110% of service volume. If the service volume is exceeded by 10%, only de minimis growth could be applied to the roadway segment. (VI) Introduction: (VI) The Transportation Element establishes policies for the movement of people, goods, and vehicles throughout unincorporated Collier County. (VI) Collier County seeks to provide a multimodal transportation system that is safe, cost-effective to construct and maintain, accessible to all residents and visitors, energy -efficient, and capable of serving both existing and future travel demand. The County’s transportation system must be compatible with and support the goals, objectives and policies of the Future Land Use Element and the other Elements of the Collier County Growth Management Plan (GMP). (VI) = Plan Amendment by Ordinance No. 2007-08 on January 25, 2007 Transportation Element as of Ordinance No. 2017-25 adopted June 13, 2017 9 (VI)(IX)(XI) The Collier County Transportation Element meets the requirements of Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes (FS), the “Community Planning Act”. The County has coordinated this Transportation Element with the Long Range Transportation Plan of the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO). (VI) As noted above, the Transportation Element addresses the movement of people and goods around Collier County. This Element is comprehensive and far-reaching, addressing the variety of transportation modes available to Collier County residents. It also addresses a variety of transportation issues. The Element includes Objectives and Policies related to the following topic areas: • Maintaining the County’s major roadways at an acceptable Level of Service. • The commitment to making roadway improvements in accordance with a Five-Year Work Program. • The protection and acquisition of future rights-of-way (ROW). • Providing for the safe and convenient movement of pedestrians and non -motorized vehicles. • Coordinating the development of the transportation system with the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) of this GMP. • Coordinating the development of the transportation system with the transportation plans of neighboring jurisdictions. • Providing for safe and convenient access between adjoining properties and encouraging safe and convenient traffic circulation within and between future developments. • Establishing and maintaining a “Checkbook” Concurrency Management System. • Developing and operating a Neighborhood Traffic Management Program. • Encouraging safe and efficient travel in rural areas of the County. • Maintaining County-owned airport properties and operations. • Encouraging the safe and efficient use of County transit services. (XI) = Plan Amendment by Ordinance No. 2017-25 on June 13, 2017 Transportation Element as of Ordinance No. 2017-25 adopted June 13, 2017 10 GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES (VI) GOAL: TO PLAN FOR, DEVELOP AND OPERATE A SAFE, EFFICIENT, AND COST EFFECTIVE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM THAT PROVIDES FOR BOTH THE MOTORIZED AND NON- MOTORIZED MOVEMENT OF PEOPLE AND GOODS THROUGHOUT COLLIER COUNTY. (II)(III)(VI)(IX) OBJECTIVE 1: Maintain the major roadway system at an acceptable Level of Service by implementing improvements as identified in the Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR) or by working directly with other responsible jurisdictions to implement needed improvements to their facilities. (III)(VI) Policy 1.1: The County will annually adopt a Schedule of Capital Improvements, covering a period not less than five (5) years, which shall include those projects needed to maintain the County’s roadway network at the adopted Level of Service standard. (III)(VI) Policy 1.2: The County shall annually appropriate the funds for the ensuing fiscal year that are necessary to accommodate those phases of transportation improvement projects listed in the first year of the Schedule of Capital Improvements. Programming decisions shall be based on the Concurrency Management System, and shall be annually incorporated in the Schedule of Capital Improvements, as contained in the Capital Improvement Element (CIE) of this Growth Management Plan. (II)(III)(VI)(VIII)(IX)(X) Policy 1.3: The standards for levels of service (LOS) of County arterial and collector roads appear in Policy 1.5.A in the Capital Improvement Element and shall be used as the basis for determining the availability of facility capacity and the demand generated by a development. The Collier County Transportation Division shall determine the traffic volumes that correspond to the different LOS thresholds on county roads. The Transportation Division shall install, as funds permit, permanent traffic count stations to better identify traffic characteristics of county roads . Based on the traffic count data the Transportation Division shall develop a financially feasible Roads component for the Capital Improvement Program of the CIE. [Note: A portion of the above Policy was revised as part of 2011 EAR-based amendments, removed from this “parent” Element of origin and relocated into the CIE. The parenthesized Roman numeral symbols remain at this location as historical reference, but may no longer apply to the entry as it now appears.] (II)(III)(VIII)(IX)(X) Policy 1.4: The standards for levels of service (LOS) of state and federal roads in the County appear in Policy 1.5.B in the Capital Improvement Element and shall be used as the basis for determining the availability of facility capacity and the demand generated by a development. (III)(VI)(IX) OBJECTIVE 2: Maintain the adopted Level of Service standard as provided for in Policy 1.5 in the Capital Improvement Element by making the improvements identified on the Five (5) Year Work Program. (X) = Plan Amendment by Ordinance No. 2015-11 on January 27, 2015 Transportation Element as of Ordinance No. 2017-25 adopted June 13, 2017 11 (III)(VI) Policy 2.1: The County shall include in its Schedule of Capital Improvements (within the Capital Improvement Element) those projects identified in the Five (5) Year Work Program that are necessary to maintain the adopted Level of Service on County roadways. (II)(III)(VI) Policy 2.2: The County shall annually appropriate the funds necessary to implement those projects shown in the first year of the Schedule of Capital Improvements. (VI)(IX)(XI) OBJECTIVE 3: Provide for the protection and acquisition of existing and future rights-of-way based upon improvement projects identified within the Five Year Work Program, Board approved development agreements, the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization’s (MPO’s) adopted Long-Range Transportation Plan and/or similar Board approved studies, plans and programs. (VI)(XI) Policy 3.1: The County shall maintain an advanced Right-of-Way Preservation and Acquisition Program. (III)(VI) Policy 3.2: The County shall continue to include funding specifically earmarked for use in the advanced Right- of-Way Acquisition Program in its annual Capital Improvement Element funding. Studies shall be conducted periodically to identify the long-range right-of-way needs of the transportation system based on buildout. Following the completion of these studies, the Transportation Administrator will present a program of funding that includes actions necessary to protect and acquire needed right-of-way. (II)(III)(VI)(IX) Policy 3.3: The County shall acquire a sufficient amount of right-of-way to facilitate arterial and collector roads as appropriate to meet the needs of the Long Range Transportation Plan or other adopted transportation studies, plans or programs, appropriate turn lanes, medians, bicycle and pedestrian features, drainage canals, a shoulder sufficient for pull offs, and landscaping areas. Exceptions to the right-of-way standard may be considered when it can be demonstrated, through a traffic capacity analysis, that the maximum number of lanes at build-out will be less than the standard. (III)(VI)(IX) Policy 3.4: Collier County shall purchase rights-of-way for transportation improvements in fee simple, unless otherwise determined appropriate by the Board of County Commissioners. (VII)(IX)(XI) Policy 3.5: A. The County is considering the viability of a Thoroughfare Corridor Protection Plan (TCPP) ordinance and land development regulations that: 1. identify, in detail, corridors necessary to develop the County roadway network shown on the County’s Long Range Transportation Plan, Board approved development agreements, the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization’s (MPO’s) adopted Long- Range Transportation Plan and/or other similar Board approved studies, plans and programs; and (XI) = Plan Amendment by Ordinance No. 2017-25 on June 13, 2017 Transportation Element as of Ordinance No. 2017-25 adopted June 13, 2017 12 2. adopt Corridor Preservation Maps, Corridor Preservation Tables, Critical Intersection Maps and Critical Intersection Tables; and 3. limit the uses of land within the required corridor, appropriately plan for the location of land uses, and direct incompatible land uses away from environmentally sensitive resources; and 4. provide for an annual update of all necessary maps and tables; and 5. provide for an approval process by the Board of County Commissioners for new or expanded corridors and intersections; and 6. provide a process for advanced reservation, donation, dedication or any other means of conveyance by an affected property owner to the County for land included within protected areas. B. For the purposes of this Policy, protected thoroughfares shall include: 1. the required corridors on either side of the center line of an existing or planned roadway; or 2. required corridors for roadway or alternative transportation networks for which no centerline has been established; or 3. corridors for future roadways or alternative transportation networks which have been identified through corridor studies; or 4. protected areas at critical intersections including but not limited to proposed grade separated intersections. All of the above must be consistent with the currently adopted Long Range Transportation Plan and/or other similar Board approved studies, agreements, plans and programs, and Chapter 336.02, Florida Statutes. (VII) Policy 3.6: In the event of a right-of-way acquisition or reservation for any purpose included in the expansion of existing transportation facilities by any federal, state, or local transportation department, authority, or agency, the requirements for buffering, native vegetation retention, preserve, setback and open space and/or any other requirements set forth in the Growth Management Plan or Land Development Code that would be affected by such right-of-way acquisition or reservation may be reduced, modified or eliminated as a result of the acquisition or reservation activities in accordance with standards established for the protection of natural resources. To ensure the protection of natural resources and directing of incompatible land uses away from environmentally sensitive resources, such reductions, modifications or eliminations shall be guided by these standards as well as the priorities set forth in the Conservation and Coastal Management Element and the Capital Improvement Element for right-of-way acquisition. Wherever a reduction of standards occurs, it shall be mitigated through the appropriate mechanisms. Such mitigation shall occur on site when feasible, on abutting land, or through other means. This Policy is not applicable to the expansion of transportation facilities in environmentally sensitive areas, as described in the Rural Land Stewardship Area (RLSA) or the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District (RFMUD), and standards for environmental protection shall be maintained during the acquisition of right-of-way. (XI) = Plan Amendment by Ordinance No. 2017-25 on June 13, 2017 Transportation Element as of Ordinance No. 2017-25 adopted June 13, 2017 13 (VI)(IX) OBJECTIVE 4: Provide for the safe and convenient movement of pedestrians and non-motorized vehicles through the implementation of the Collier County Comprehensive Pathways Plan. (VI)(IX) Policy 4.1: The County shall incorporate the Collier County Comprehensive Pathways Plan into this Transportation Element by reference and will periodically update the Pathways Plan as needed. (II)(III)(VI) Policy 4.2: The County shall provide an interconnected and continuous bicycle and pedestrian system by constructing the improvements identified on the 2030 Pathway Facilities Map series as funds permit. (II)(III)(VI) Policy 4.3: The County’s pathways construction program should be consistent with the Comprehensive Pathways Plan to the maximum extent feasible. (VI) Policy 4.4: The County shall annually adopt a Five (5) Year Pathways Work Program, which establishes pathway priorities, including projects to retrofit existing streets to accommodate bicycles and pedestrians. (VI)(IX) Policy 4.5: The County shall identify state and federal funds and provide local funds for the implementation of the 5 Year Pathways Work Program. (III)(VI)(IX) Policy 4.6: The County shall work to reduce Vehicle Miles Traveled and Greenhouse Gas Emission by providing for the safe movement of non-motorized vehicles through implementation of its Land Development Code and highway design standards ordinances and shall incorporate bike lanes, sidewalks and pathways, as deemed appropriate, in new construction and reconstruction of roadways. (III) Policy 4.7: The County shall incorporate bike lanes in roadway resurfacing projects as is physically possible and will not result in a safety or operational problem. (III)(VI) Policy 4.8: The County shall follow the most current bicycle and pedestrian facilities design and construction standards, as developed by the Florida Department of Transportation. (IX) = Plan Amendment by Ordinance No. 2013-04 on January 8, 2013 Transportation Element as of Ordinance No. 2017-25 adopted June 13, 2017 14 (VI)(IX) OBJECTIVE 5: Coordinate the Transportation System development process with the Future Land Use Map. (III)(V)(VI)(IX) Policy 5.1: The County Commission shall review all rezone petitions, SRA designation applications, conditional use petitions, and proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) affecting the overall countywide density or intensity of permissible development, with consideration of their impact on the overall County transportation system, and shall not approve any petition or application that would directly access a deficient roadway segment as identified in the current AUIR or if it impacts an adjacent roadway segment that is deficient as identified in the current AUIR, or which significantly impacts a roadway segment or adjacent roadway segment that is currently operating and/or is projected to operate below an adopted Level of Service Standard within the five year AUIR planning period, unless specific mitigating stipulations are also approved. A petition or application has significant impacts if the traffic impact statement reveals that any of the following occur: a. For links (roadway segments) directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; b. For links adjacent to links directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; and c. For all other links the project traffic is considered to be significant up to the point where it is equal to or exceeds 3% of the adopted LOS standard service volume. (IX) Mitigating stipulations shall be based upon a mitigation plan prepared by the applicant and submitted as part of the traffic impact statement that addresses the project’s significant impacts on all roadways. (III)(IV) Policy 5.2: Project traffic that is 1% or less of the adopted peak hour service volume represents a de minimis impact. Authorization of development with a de minimis impact shall be pursuant to Section 163.3180(6), Florida Statutes. (III)(IV)(VI)(IX) Policy 5.3: In order to determine vesting, where desired, all previously approved projects must go th rough a vesting review pursuant to Subsection 10.02.07.B.7, of the Land Development Code. (IV)(VI)(IX)(X) Policy 5.4: Pursuant to Section 163.3180, Florida Statutes and the Urban Infill and Urban Redevelopment Strategy contained in the Future Land Use Element of this Plan, the South US 41 Transportation Concurrency Exception Area (TCEA) is hereby designated. Development located within the South US 41 TCEA (Map TR‒4) may be exempt from transportation concurrency requirements, so long as impacts to the transportation system are mitigated using the procedures established in Policies 5.5 and 5.6 below, and in consideration of the following: (VI)(VIII) A. Any proposed development within the concurrency exception area that would reduce the LOS on Strategic Intermodal System (SIS) roadways within the County by 5% or more of the capacity at the adopted LOS standard shall meet the transportation concurrency requirements specified in Capital Improvement Element, Policy 5.3. (X) = Plan Amendment by Ordinance No. 2015-11 on January 27, 2015 Transportation Element as of Ordinance No. 2017-25 adopted June 13, 2017 15 (VI)(VIII) B. Any proposed development within the concurrency exception area that would reduce the LOS on SIS roadways within the County by less than 5% of the capacity at the adopted LOS standard and meets the requirements identified below in Policy 5.6 are exempt from the transportation requirements of Capital Improvement Element, Policy 5.3. (IV)(VI)(IX)(X)(XI) Policy 5.5: Commercial developments within the South US 41 TCEA that choose to obtain an exception from concurrency requirements for transportation will provide certification to the County transportation planning agency that at least four (4) of the following Transportation Demand Management (TDM) strategies will be utilized: a) Preferential parking for carpools and vanpools that is expected to increase the average vehicle occupancy for work trips generated by the development. b) Parking charge that is expected to increase the average vehicle occupancy for work trips generated by the development and/or increase transit ridership. c) Cash subsidy that is expected to increase the average vehicle occupancy for work trips generated by the development and/or increase transit ridership. d) Flexible work schedules that are expected to reduce peak hour automobile work trips generated by the development. e) Compressed workweek that would be expected to reduce vehicle miles of travel and pea k hour work trips generated by the development. f) Telecommuting that would be expected to reduce the vehicle miles of travel and peak hour work trips generated by the development. g) Transit subsidy that would be expected to reduce auto trips generated by the development and increase transit ridership. h) Bicycle and pedestrian facilities that would be expected to reduce vehicle miles of travel and automobile work trips generated by the development. i) Including residential units as a portion of a commercial project that would be expected to reduce vehicle miles of travel. Residential developments within the South US 41 TCEA that choose to obtain an exception from concurrency requirements for transportation shall provide documentation to the County transportation planning agency that at least three (3) of the following Transportation Demand Management (TDM) strategies will be utilized: a) Including neighborhood commercial uses within a residential project. b) Providing transit shelters within the development (in coordination with Collier Area Transit). c) Providing bicycle and pedestrian facilities with connections to adjacent commercial properties. (IX) (XI) d) Vehicular access to adjacent commercial properties with shared commercial and residential parking. (XI) = Plan Amendment by Ordinance No. 2017-25 on June 13, 2017 Transportation Element as of Ordinance No. 2017-25 adopted June 13, 2017 16 An applicant seeking an exception from concurrency requirements for transportation through the certification mentioned above shall submit an application to the County transportation planning agency on forms provided by the agency. Binding commitments to utilize any of the above techniques relied upon to obtain certification shall be required as a condition of development approval. (IX)(X) (XI) Monitoring of the use and effectiveness of the TDM strategies selected shall be included in the required annual monitoring report. Developments not required to submit an annual monitoring report shall, for three (3) years following completion of the development, provide an assessment as to the use and effectiveness of the selected strategies in a form provided by the County. Modifications to the applied TDM strategies may be made within the first three (3) years of development if they are deemed ineffective. Modifications to the new TDM strategies may be made within this second three year period and subsequent three year periods if the TDM strategies are deemed ineffective. Another assessment shall be completed within three (3) years and in three (3) year increments until the TDM strategies are deemed effective. Developments within the South US 41 TCEA that do not obtain certification shall meet all concurrency requirements. Whether or not a concurrency exception is requested, developments will be subject to a concurrency review for the purpose of reserving capacity for those trips associated with the development and maintaining accurate counts of the remaining capacity on the roadway network. (IV)(VI)(XI) Policy 5.6: The County shall designate Transportation Concurrency Management Areas (TCMAs) to encourage compact urban development where an integrated and connected network of roads is in place that provide multiple, viable alternative travel paths or modes for common trips. Performance within each TCMA shall be measured based on the percentage of lane miles meeting the LOS described in this Transportation Element, and Policies 1.5.A and 1.5.B of the Capital Improvement Element. The following Transportation Concurrency Management Areas are designated: A. Northwest TCMA – This area is bounded by the Collier ‒ Lee County Line on the north side; the west side of the I-75 right-of-way on the east side; Pine Ridge Road on the south side; and, the Gulf of Mexico on the west side (Map TR‒5). B. East Central TCMA – This area is bounded by Pine Ridge Road on the north side; Collier Boulevard on the east side; Davis Boulevard on the south side, and; Livingston Road (extended) on the west side (Map TR‒6). (IX)(X) In order to be exempt from link-specific concurrency, developments within the TCMA must provide documentation to the Transportation Planning Section that at least two (2) Transportation Demand Management (TDM) strategies utilized meet the criteria of the LDC. Monitoring of the use and effectiveness of the TDM strategies selected shall be included in the required annual monitoring report. Developments not required to submit an annual monitoring report shall, for three (3) years following completion of the development, provide an assessment as to the use and effectiveness of the selected strategies in a form provided by the County. Modifications to the applied TDM strategies may be made within the first three (3) years of development if they are deemed ineffective. Modifications to the new TDM strategies may be made within this second three year period and subsequent three year periods if the TDM strategies are deemed ineffective. Another assessment shall be completed within three (3) years and in three year increments until the TDM strategies are deemed effective. (XI) = Plan Amendment by Ordinance No. 2017-25 on June 13, 2017 Transportation Element as of Ordinance No. 2017-25 adopted June 13, 2017 17 (IV)(VI)(XI) Policy 5.7: Each TCMA shall maintain 85% of its lane miles at or above the LOS standards described in Policies 1.5.A and 1.5.B of the Capital Improvement Element. If any Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) for a proposed development indicates that fewer than 85% of the lane miles in a TCMA are achieving the LOS standards indicated above, the proposed development shall not be permitted where such condition occurs unless modification of the development is made sufficient to maintain the LOS standard for the TCMA, or the facilities required to maintain the TCMA LOS standard are committed utilizing the standards for committed improvements in Policy 5.3 of the Capital Improvement Element of the Plan. (IV)(VI)(IX) Policy 5.8: Should the TIS for a proposed development reflect that it will impact either a constrained roadway link and/or a deficient roadway link within a TCMA as determined in the most current Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR), by more than a de minimis amount (more than 1% of the maximum service volume at the adopted LOS), yet continue to maintain the established percentage of lanes miles indicated in Policy 5.7 of this Element, a proportionate share congestion mitigation payment shall be required as follows: (VI)(IX) a. Congestion mitigation payments shall be calculated using the formula established in Section 163.3180(5)(h), Florida Statutes. The facility cost for a constrained roadway link shall be established using a typical lane mile cost, as determined by the Collier County Transportation Administrator, of adding lanes to a similar area/facility type as the constrained facility. (VI) b. Congestion mitigation payments shall be utilized by Collier County to add trip capacity within the impacted TCMA, road segment(s) and/or to enhance mass transit or other non-automotive transportation alternatives, which adds trip capacity within the impact fee district or adjoining impact fee district. (VI) c. Congestion mitigation payments under this Policy shall be determined subsequent to a finding of concurrency for a proposed project within a TCMA and shall not influence the concurrency determination process. (VI)(IX) d. No impact will be de minimis if it exceeds the adopted LOS standard of any affected designated hurricane evacuation routes within a TCMA. Hurricane routes in Collier County are shown on Map TR‒7. Any impact to a hurricane evacuation route within a TCMA shall require a proportionate share congestion mitigation payment provided the remaining LOS requirements of the TCMA are maintained. (IX) OBJECTIVE 6: Coordinate the Transportation Element with the plans and programs of the state, region, and other local jurisdictions. (II)(XI) Policy 6.1: The Transportation Element shall incorporate to the greatest degree possible, the long range plans of the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization. (III)(VI) Policy 6.2: The Transportation Element shall consider any and all applicable roadway plans of the City of Naples, City of Marco Island, Everglades City, Florida Department of Transportation, Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council, City of Bonita Springs and Lee County. (XI) = Plan Amendment by Ordinance No. 2017-25 on June 13, 2017 Transportation Element as of Ordinance No. 2017-25 adopted June 13, 2017 18 (III)(VI)(IX) Policy 6.3: The County shall coordinate with applicable local jurisdictions with regard to operations, maintenance and capital expenditures on the County arterial/collector system within the City of Naples, Everglades City and the City of Marco Island. Policy 6.4: The Transportation Element shall consider the State's adopted Five (5) Year Work Program, the Florida Transportation Plan, and the State Land Development Plan. (II)(III)(IX)(X) Policy 6.5: The Collier County MPO’s adopted Long Range Plan has identified a number of potential, critical need intersections, including an interchange in the vicinity of I-75/Everglades Boulevard; a US 41/SR-CR 951 grade separated overpass; and, a Randall Boulevard/Immokalee Road grade separated overpass. The County shall pursue such projects in a manner consistent with the findings of the AUIR and through the development of the FDOT 5-year Work Program, as appropriate. (VI)(IX) OBJECTIVE 7: Develop and adopt standards for safe and efficient ingress and egress to adjoining properties, and encourage safe and convenient on-site traffic circulation through the development review process. (III) Policy 7.1: Collier County shall apply the standards and criteria of the Access Management Policy as adopted by Resolution and as may be amended to ensure the protection of the arterial and collector system’s capacity and integrity. Policy 7.2: The County shall require the submission of a neighborhood traffic impact assessment as a part of all rezone and conditional use applications. This study will analyze the proposed project’s impact on surrounding neighborhood streets. (VI)(IX) Policy 7.3: The County shall implement, through its Land Development Code and Code of Laws and Ordinances, the provision of safe and convenient onsite traffic flow and the need for adequate parking for both motorized and non-motorized vehicles as a primary objective in the review of Planned Unit Developments, Site Development Plans, and other appropriate stages of review in the land development application review process. Coordination shall occur with County Engineering staff where traffic circulation is outside the limits of the public ROW. (III)(VI)(IX) Policy 7.4: The County shall develop corridor management plans that take into consideration urban design and landscaping measures that will promote “smart growth” development along the major arterial entrances to the urban area. Such plans shall take into account the recommendations of the Community Character Plan, County-sponsored smart growth initiatives, and the impacts of the South US 41 Transportation Concurrency Exception Area (TCEA) and the two (2) Transportation (X) = Plan Amendment by Ordinance No. 2015-11 on January 27, 2015 Transportation Element as of Ordinance No. 2017-25 adopted June 13, 2017 19 Concurrency Management Areas (TCMAs) as the Board of County Commissioners may periodically appropriate funding for these plans. The County shall consider the recommendations from the Collier County Master Mobility Plan upon its completion and shall submit those “smart growth” strategies that it determines to be appropriate for consideration as Growth Management Plan or Land Development Code Amendments. (III)(VI)(IX) Policy 7.5: The County has developed and shall continue to effectively implement a Corridor Access Management Policy through the development of individual corridor access management improvement plans. Such plans are designed to make median modifications and other operational improvements, including removal of traffic signals, necessary to recapture lost capacity and enhance safety. The development of such improvement plans shall consider the impacts of the South US 41 Transportation Concurrency Exception Area (TCEA) and the two (2) Transportation Concurrency Management Areas (TCMAs), as may be appropriate. (VI) Policy 7.6: The County shall use community impact assessment techniques in evaluating projects in the transportation planning process. These techniques include the use of the Efficient Transportation Decision Making Process (ETDM) through the Long Range Plan to address environmental and socio-cultural issues as well as corridor specific analysis through the Project Development and Environmental Studies and Corridor studies. In addition, during the design of transportation projects there are numerous design and special meetings to take into account the socio -cultural elements of the community including character issues such as aesthetics, avoiding or mitigating for environmental impacts, noise and community disruption issues. (IX) OBJECTIVE 8: Maintain a "Concurrency Management System" for the scheduling, funding, and timely construction of necessary road facilities. (III)(VI) Policy 8.1: Each year, the County will use short-term projections of previous years’ traffic volume growth to estimate the year in which LOS deficiencies are likely to occur on County roads. This information will be used to prepare the annual update of the County’s schedule of Capital Improvements in a manner that ensures the maintenance of concurrency on County road facilities. (III)(VI) Policy 8.2: Pursuant to Chapter 163.3180 F.S., and in accordance with the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance (Land Development Code Sections 6.02.00 and 10.02.07), development proposals shall be required to submit traffic impact analyses. (III)(VI)(IX) OBJECTIVE 9: Encourage neighborhood involvement in the establishment and maintenance of safe and pleasant conditions for the residents, pedestrians, bicyclists and motorists on neighborhood streets, which are not classified as arterials or collectors through the implementation of the Collier County (IX) = Plan Amendment by Ordinance No. 2013-04 on January 8, 2013 Transportation Element as of Ordinance No. 2017-25 adopted June 13, 2017 20 Neighborhood Traffic Management Program (NTMP). In developing strategies and measures to encourage such conditions within the NTMP, consider the impact of such strategies and measures on the adjacent arterial and collector systems (from a level-of-service and operational standpoint). (VI) Policy 9.1: The County shall incorporate the Neighborhood Traffic Management Program into this Transportation Element by reference and shall update Program provisions as needed. (VI) Policy 9.2: The purpose of the Neighborhood Traffic Management Program (NTMP) shall be to establish procedures and techniques that promote neighborhood livability by mitigating the negative impacts of traffic on residential neighborhoods. The strategies and measures utilized by the NTMP may include, but shall not necessarily be limited to: (VI) (a) Educational programs that seek to remind speeding drivers of the negative effects of their actions. Such programs may use brochures or neighborhood newsletters to spread this message. Newsletters may also contain information on speeding fines (particularly in school zones), pedestrian and bicycle safety tips, and information on average speeds in the neighborhood. (VI) (b) Enforcement measures, which may involve the temporary establishment of a more intensive police presence and a better allocation of patrol time devoted to enforcing traffic safety in a particular neighborhood. (VI) (c) The use of engineering techniques (also known as traffic calming) to slow traffic on certain streets and/or to divert through-traffic away from certain neighborhoods. The use of such techniques shall consider their potential impacts to emergency vehicles, bicyclists and pedestrians. (III)(VI)(IX) Policy 9.3: The County shall require, wherever feasible, the interconnection of local streets between developments to facilitate convenient movement throughout the road network. The LDC shall identify the circumstances and conditions that would require the interconnection of neighboring developments, and shall also develop standards and criteria for the safe interconnection of such local streets. (VI) Policy 9.4: The County shall define on a project-by-project basis, the acceptable amount of rerouted traffic as a result of a traffic management project. (VI) Policy 9.5: The County shall encourage projects which provide local resident, pedestrian, bicyclist and motorist movement between and among developments on neighborhood streets in a deliberate balance with its efforts to route cut-through traffic away from neighborhoods and to the arterials and collectors designated in this Transportation Element of the Collier County Growth Management Plan. (IX) = Plan Amendment by Ordinance No. 2013-04 on January 8, 2013 Transportation Element as of Ordinance No. 2017-25 adopted June 13, 2017 21 (VI) Policy 9.6: The County shall review impacts on emergency vehicle access or response time to neighborhoods, both before and after implementation of traffic calming measures. If emergency vehicle access or response times into a neighborhood have been adversely impacted by the traffic calming measures, the County shall work with the relevant emergency responders to reduce or eliminate such adverse impacts while still maintaining traffic calm ing measures. (III)(VI) Policy 9.7: Roadways identified as collector or arterial facilities are not eligible for participation in the NTMP. (III)(VI) Policy 9.8: The County shall consider a variety of traffic calming devices to achieve the NTMP’s objectives for a project. Such traffic calming devices shall be planned and designed in conformance with sound engineering and planning practices. Primary funding for such plans may come from local funding initiatives such as MSTUs or MSBUs for the area that is to benefit from the traffic calming. (VI) Policy 9.9: To implement the NTMP, certain procedures shall be followed in processing neighborhood traffic management requests in accordance with applicable codes and related policies and within the limits of available resources. At a minimum, the procedures shall provide for: - Submittal of project proposals; - Evaluation of proposals by staff; - Citizen participation in plan development and evaluation; - Methods of temporarily testing traffic management plans when needed; - Communication of any test results and specific findings to area residents and affected neighborhood organizations before installation of permanent traffic calming devices; and - Appropriate County Commission review. (VI)(IX) OBJECTIVE 10: Encourage safe and efficient mobility for the rural public that remains consistent with the character of the rural areas of Collier County. (VI) Policy 10.1: The County shall examine the maintenance and operational needs of the rural roadway system, addressing the mobility needs of rural residents to include the availability of roads for rural -to- urban travel, travel within the rural area, and for emergency evacuation purposes. (VI) Policy 10.2: The County shall continue to improve transit services for the transportation disadvantaged in the rural areas through the Community Transportation Coordinator (CTC). (VI)(IX) OBJECTIVE 11: Maintain County owned airport facilities as attractive, efficient, safe, and environmentally compatible facilities, consistent with the approved Airport Master Plan for each Airport. (IX) = Plan Amendment by Ordinance No. 2013-04 on January 8, 2013 Transportation Element as of Ordinance No. 2017-25 adopted June 13, 2017 22 (VI) Policy 11.1: The County shall herein incorporate by reference the Immokalee Regional Airport, Evergl ades Airpark, and Marco Island Executive Airport Master Plans. (VI)(IX) Policy 11.2: The Collier County Airport Authority shall determine the most cost effective and efficient means for implementing future facility plans outlined within the airport master plans. Airport Master Plans shall be submitted to the Board of County Commissions for review and approval. (VI)(XI) Policy 11.3: The Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) has assisted Everglades City in obtaining Federal funds to enable the City to maintain and operate the Everglades Air Park. Given the assistance provided to Everglades City by the MPO, the Collier County Board of County Commissioners shall coordinate with the Everglades City Council to ensure a safe and orderly transfer of the Everglades Airpark and all related facilities to Everglades City for use as a public airport only. Such transfer shall be in a manner that does not compromise the safety of the Airpark and the future facility plans authorized by the Everglades Airpark Master Plan. In the event the Airpark ceases operation or ceases to operate as a public Airpark, the Airpark property will revert back to Collier County. Conditions of a transfer and reverter provisions will be set forth in a transfer document or the deed for transfer. (IX) OBJECTIVE 12: Encourage the efficient use of transit services now and in the future. (II)(VI)(XI) Policy 12.1: The Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization, through the Transportation Disadvantaged Program shall assist the local community transportation coordinator in the implementation of the most efficient and effective level of service possible for the transportation disa dvantaged. The Transportation Disadvantaged Program shall be implemented through the County’s regular bus system. (II)(III)(XI) Policy 12.2: The County Transportation Division and the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization shall coordinate the development and maintenance of transit development plans with the Florida Department of Transportation. (II)(III)(VI) Policy 12.3: Collier County shall be the managing authority of the Collier Area Transit (CAT) system. (VI) Policy 12.4: The County shall, in recognition that the potential for public transit service between Bonita Springs, in Lee County, and Naples, in Collier County, exists, consider any intergovernmental efforts, which are necessary to bring about such service. (II)(VI) Policy 12.5: The County shall continue to participate in the MPO planning process through implementation of an interlocal agreement with the City of Naples, the City of Marco Island and Everglades City and a Joint Participation Agreement with the FDOT. (XI) = Plan Amendment by Ordinance No. 2017-25 on June 13, 2017 Transportation Element as of Ordinance No. 2017-25 adopted June 13, 2017 23 (III)(VI) Policy 12.6: The County shall participate in the MPO planning process as a voting presence on the MPO Board and the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC). Policy 12.7: Following the adoption of any transit development plan, the County shall initiate the development of transit right-of-way and corridor protection strategies, including ordinances and policy additions. (IX) Policy 12.8: The County shall include capital expenditures for any adopted transit development plan in the Capital Improvement Element. (II)(III)(VI)(IX) Policy 12.9: The County shall incorporate herein by reference the most recent Public Transit Development Plan adopted by the Board of County Commissioners. (IX) OBJECTIVE 13: Evaluate the creation of a separate Transit Element to give alternative means of transportation equal treatment within the Growth Management Plan. (IX) Policy 13.1: The County may develop a Transit Element, a Transit Sub-Element within this Transportation Element or incorporate alternative means of transportation into the Growth Management Plan through other appropriate modifications, based upon the conclusion of the November 2011 Master Mobility Plan. (IX) = Plan Amendment by Ordinance No. 2013-04 on January 8, 2013 APPENDIX H SYNCHRO 10 INTERSECTION ANALYSIS Lanes, Volumes, Timings 3: Guilford Rd. & US 41 (Tamiami Trail)02/18/2019 Keiser 2021 AM PK BACKGROUND Model.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Lane Group SEU SEL SET SER NWU NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)12 15 796 5 8 8 2004 13 21 0 16 15 Future Volume (vph)12 15 796 5 8 8 2004 13 21 0 16 15 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft)375 0 265 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 1010000 Taper Length (ft) 50 50 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.91 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.999 0.999 0.941 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.972 Satd. Flow (prot)0 1770 5080 0 0 1770 5080 0 0 1704 0 0 Flt Permitted 0.094 0.313 0.811 Satd. Flow (perm)0 175 5080 0 0 583 5080 0 0 1422 0 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR)3 3 27 Link Speed (mph)45 45 25 Link Distance (ft)568 591 370 Travel Time (s)8.6 9.0 10.1 Peak Hour Factor 0.71 0.71 0.92 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.92 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 Adj. Flow (vph)17 21 865 7 11 11 2178 18 30 0 23 21 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 38 872 0 0 22 2196 0 0 53 0 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment R NA Left Left Right R NA Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Median Width(ft)12 30 0 Link Offset(ft)0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft)12 12 12 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph)9 15 9 9 15 9 15 9 15 Number of Detectors 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Left Thru Left Left Thru Left Thru Left Leading Detector (ft)20 20 100 20 20 100 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft)20 20 6 20 20 6 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft)94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft)6 6 6 Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Perm Perm NA Perm Perm NA Perm NA Perm Protected Phases 6 2 4 Permitted Phases 6 6 2 2 4 8 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 3: Guilford Rd. & US 41 (Tamiami Trail)02/18/2019 Keiser 2021 AM PK BACKGROUND Model.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Lane Group SWT SWR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)2 8 Future Volume (vph)2 8 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 Storage Length (ft)0 Storage Lanes 1 Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 Flt Protected 0.958 Satd. Flow (prot)1785 1583 Flt Permitted 0.852 Satd. Flow (perm)1587 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR)27 Link Speed (mph)25 Link Distance (ft)246 Travel Time (s)6.7 Peak Hour Factor 0.71 0.71 Adj. Flow (vph)3 11 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 24 11 Enter Blocked Intersection No No Lane Alignment Left Right Median Width(ft)0 Link Offset(ft)0 Crosswalk Width(ft)12 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph)9 Number of Detectors 2 1 Detector Template Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft)0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft)6 20 Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 Turn Type NA Perm Protected Phases 8 Permitted Phases 8 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 3: Guilford Rd. & US 41 (Tamiami Trail)02/18/2019 Keiser 2021 AM PK BACKGROUND Model.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 3 Lane Group SEU SEL SET SER NWU NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL Detector Phase 6 6 6 2 2 2 4 4 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s)5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s)22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 Total Split (s)37.5 37.5 37.5 37.5 37.5 37.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 Total Split (%)62.5% 62.5% 62.5% 62.5% 62.5% 62.5% 37.5% 37.5% 37.5% Maximum Green (s) 33.0 33.0 33.0 33.0 33.0 33.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 Yellow Time (s)3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 All-Red Time (s)1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s)4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lead/Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode Max Max Max Max Max Max None None None Walk Time (s)7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s)44.2 44.2 44.2 44.2 6.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.12 v/c Ratio 0.27 0.21 0.05 0.53 0.27 Control Delay 9.8 2.4 3.1 3.8 16.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 9.8 2.4 3.1 3.8 16.3 LOS AA AA B Approach Delay 2.7 3.8 16.3 Approach LOS A A B Intersection Summary Area Type:Other Cycle Length: 60 Actuated Cycle Length: 54 Natural Cycle: 60 Control Type: Semi Act-Uncoord Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.53 Intersection Signal Delay: 3.8 Intersection LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 58.6%ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 3: Guilford Rd. & US 41 (Tamiami Trail) Lanes, Volumes, Timings 3: Guilford Rd. & US 41 (Tamiami Trail)02/18/2019 Keiser 2021 AM PK BACKGROUND Model.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 4 Lane Group SWT SWR Detector Phase 8 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s)5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s)22.5 22.5 Total Split (s)22.5 22.5 Total Split (%)37.5% 37.5% Maximum Green (s) 18.0 18.0 Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 All-Red Time (s)1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s)4.5 4.5 Lead/Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 Act Effct Green (s)6.7 6.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.12 0.12 v/c Ratio 0.12 0.05 Control Delay 21.2 4.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 21.2 4.6 LOS C A Approach Delay 16.0 Approach LOS B Intersection Summary HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: U.S. 41 (Tamiami Trail & Lakewood Blvd.02/18/2019 Keiser 2021 AM PK BACKGROUND Model.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 3 Movement SEU SEL SET SER NWU NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)11 34 716 74 11 20 1806 66 134 14 12 75 Future Volume (vph)11 34 716 74 11 20 1806 66 134 14 12 75 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Total Lost time (s)4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.93 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot)3433 5085 1583 1770 5085 1583 1770 1736 1770 Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.35 1.00 1.00 0.67 1.00 0.74 Satd. Flow (perm)3614 5085 1583 643 5085 1583 1253 1736 1370 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.79 0.79 0.92 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.92 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 Adj. Flow (vph)14 43 778 94 14 25 1963 84 170 18 15 95 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 32 0 0 0 40 0 12 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 57 778 62 0 39 1963 44 170 21 0 95 Turn Type Perm Prot NA Perm Perm Perm NA Perm Perm NA Perm Protected Phases 1 6 2 4 Permitted Phases 6 6 2 2 2 4 8 Actuated Green, G (s)3.0 38.2 38.2 30.7 30.7 30.7 10.9 10.9 10.9 Effective Green, g (s)3.0 38.2 38.2 30.7 30.7 30.7 10.9 10.9 10.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.05 0.66 0.66 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.19 0.19 0.19 Clearance Time (s)4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s)3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph)186 3343 1040 339 2686 836 235 325 257 v/s Ratio Prot c0.15 c0.39 0.01 v/s Ratio Perm 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.03 c0.14 0.07 v/c Ratio 0.31 0.23 0.06 0.12 0.73 0.05 0.72 0.06 0.37 Uniform Delay, d1 26.5 4.0 3.5 6.9 10.5 6.6 22.2 19.4 20.6 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.9 0.2 0.1 0.7 1.8 0.1 10.5 0.1 0.9 Delay (s)27.5 4.2 3.7 7.6 12.3 6.8 32.7 19.5 21.5 Level of Service C A A A B A C B C Approach Delay (s)5.6 12.0 30.5 Approach LOS A B C Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 11.9 HCM 2000 Level of Service B HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.71 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 58.1 Sum of lost time (s)13.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 56.5% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: U.S. 41 (Tamiami Trail & Lakewood Blvd.02/18/2019 Keiser 2021 AM PK BACKGROUND Model.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 4 Movement SWT SWR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)22 82 Future Volume (vph)22 82 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 Lane Width 16 12 Total Lost time (s)4.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 Frt 0.88 Flt Protected 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot)1862 Flt Permitted 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm)1862 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.79 0.79 Adj. Flow (vph)28 104 RTOR Reduction (vph) 84 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 48 0 Turn Type NA Protected Phases 8 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 10.9 Effective Green, g (s) 10.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.19 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 349 v/s Ratio Prot 0.03 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.14 Uniform Delay, d1 19.7 Progression Factor 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.2 Delay (s)19.9 Level of Service B Approach Delay (s) 20.5 Approach LOS C Intersection Summary HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3: Guilford Rd. & US 41 (Tamiami Trail)02/18/2019 Keiser 2021 AM PK BACKGROUND Plus Project Model.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 5 Movement SEU SEL SET SER NWU NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)12 15 856 5 48 9 2051 14 21 0 17 16 Future Volume (vph)12 15 856 5 48 9 2051 14 21 0 17 16 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s)4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.94 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 Satd. Flow (prot)1770 5080 1770 5079 1704 Flt Permitted 0.10 1.00 0.29 1.00 0.81 Satd. Flow (perm)177 5080 546 5079 1424 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.71 0.71 0.92 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.92 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 Adj. Flow (vph) 17 21 930 7 68 13 2229 20 30 0 24 23 RTOR Reduction (vph)0010001002500 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 38 936 0 0 81 2248 0 0 29 0 0 Turn Type Perm Perm NA Perm Perm NA Perm NA Perm Protected Phases 6 2 4 Permitted Phases 6 6 2 2 4 8 Actuated Green, G (s)42.0 42.0 42.0 42.0 4.5 Effective Green, g (s)42.0 42.0 42.0 42.0 4.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.08 Clearance Time (s)4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s)3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph)133 3844 413 3843 115 v/s Ratio Prot 0.18 c0.44 v/s Ratio Perm 0.21 0.15 c0.02 v/c Ratio 0.29 0.24 0.20 0.59 0.25 Uniform Delay, d1 2.1 2.0 1.9 2.9 23.9 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 5.3 0.2 1.1 0.7 1.2 Delay (s)7.4 2.2 3.0 3.6 25.1 Level of Service A A A A C Approach Delay (s)2.4 3.6 25.1 Approach LOS A A C Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 3.8 HCM 2000 Level of Service A HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.55 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 55.5 Sum of lost time (s)9.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 67.0% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min)15 c Critical Lane Group HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3: Guilford Rd. & US 41 (Tamiami Trail)02/18/2019 Keiser 2021 AM PK BACKGROUND Plus Project Model.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 6 Movement SWT SWR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)2 8 Future Volume (vph)2 8 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 Total Lost time (s)4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.96 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot)1784 1583 Flt Permitted 0.84 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm)1560 1583 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.71 0.71 Adj. Flow (vph) 3 11 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 10 Lane Group Flow (vph) 26 1 Turn Type NA Perm Protected Phases 8 Permitted Phases 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 4.5 4.5 Effective Green, g (s) 4.5 4.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.08 0.08 Clearance Time (s)4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 126 128 v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm 0.02 0.00 v/c Ratio 0.21 0.01 Uniform Delay, d1 23.8 23.4 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.8 0.0 Delay (s) 24.6 23.5 Level of Service C C Approach Delay (s) 24.3 Approach LOS C Intersection Summary HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: U.S. 41 (Tamiami Trail & Lakewood Blvd.02/18/2019 Keiser 2021 AM PK BACKGROUND Plus Project Model.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 7 Movement SEU SEL SET SER NWU NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)73 37 752 75 11 20 1852 66 135 14 12 75 Future Volume (vph)73 37 752 75 11 20 1852 66 135 14 12 75 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Total Lost time (s)4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.93 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot)3433 5085 1583 1770 5085 1583 1770 1736 1770 Flt Permitted 0.40 1.00 1.00 0.33 1.00 1.00 0.66 1.00 0.74 Satd. Flow (perm)1460 5085 1583 618 5085 1583 1225 1736 1370 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.79 0.79 0.92 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.92 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 Adj. Flow (vph)92 47 817 95 14 25 2013 84 171 18 15 95 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 31 0 0 0 44 0 12 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 139 817 64 0 39 2013 40 171 21 0 95 Turn Type Perm Prot NA Perm Perm Perm NA Perm Perm NA Perm Protected Phases 1 6 2 4 Permitted Phases 6 6 2 2 2 4 8 Actuated Green, G (s)9.9 48.1 48.1 33.7 33.7 33.7 14.1 14.1 14.1 Effective Green, g (s)9.9 48.1 48.1 33.7 33.7 33.7 14.1 14.1 14.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 0.68 0.68 0.47 0.47 0.47 0.20 0.20 0.20 Clearance Time (s)4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s)3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph)203 3435 1069 292 2406 749 242 343 271 v/s Ratio Prot 0.16 c0.40 0.01 v/s Ratio Perm c0.10 0.04 0.06 0.03 c0.14 0.07 v/c Ratio 0.88dl 0.24 0.06 0.13 0.84 0.05 0.71 0.06 0.35 Uniform Delay, d1 29.2 4.5 3.9 10.5 16.3 10.1 26.6 23.2 24.6 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 9.2 0.2 0.1 0.9 3.7 0.1 9.1 0.1 0.8 Delay (s)38.4 4.6 4.0 11.5 20.0 10.3 35.7 23.3 25.4 Level of Service D A A B C B D C C Approach Delay (s)9.0 19.5 33.7 Approach LOS A B C Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 17.6 HCM 2000 Level of Service B HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.78 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 71.2 Sum of lost time (s)13.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 65.3% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 dl Defacto Left Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a left lane. c Critical Lane Group HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: U.S. 41 (Tamiami Trail & Lakewood Blvd.02/18/2019 Keiser 2021 AM PK BACKGROUND Plus Project Model.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 8 Movement SWT SWR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)22 87 Future Volume (vph)22 87 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 Lane Width 16 12 Total Lost time (s)4.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 Frt 0.88 Flt Protected 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot)1859 Flt Permitted 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm)1859 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.79 0.79 Adj. Flow (vph)28 110 RTOR Reduction (vph) 88 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 50 0 Turn Type NA Protected Phases 8 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 14.1 Effective Green, g (s) 14.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.20 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 368 v/s Ratio Prot 0.03 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.14 Uniform Delay, d1 23.5 Progression Factor 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.2 Delay (s)23.7 Level of Service C Approach Delay (s) 24.4 Approach LOS C Intersection Summary HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: U.S. 41 (Tamiami Trail & Lakewood Blvd.02/18/2019 Keiser 2021 PM PK BACKGROUND Model.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 11 Movement SEU SEL SET SER NWU NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)22 157 2145 179 50 39 1455 78 125 61 42 127 Future Volume (vph)22 157 2145 179 50 39 1455 78 125 61 42 127 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Total Lost time (s)4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.94 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot)3433 5085 1583 1770 5085 1583 1770 1749 1770 Flt Permitted 0.46 1.00 1.00 0.19 1.00 1.00 0.69 1.00 0.67 Satd. Flow (perm)1661 5085 1583 360 5085 1583 1278 1749 1255 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.79 0.79 0.92 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.92 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 Adj. Flow (vph)28 199 2332 227 63 49 1582 99 158 77 53 161 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 82 0 0 0 60 0200 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 227 2332 145 0 112 1582 39 158 128 0 161 Turn Type Perm Prot NA Perm Perm Perm NA Perm Perm NA Perm Protected Phases 1 6 2 4 Permitted Phases 6 6 2 2 2 4 8 Actuated Green, G (s)8.7 33.9 33.9 20.7 20.7 20.7 10.0 10.0 10.0 Effective Green, g (s)8.7 33.9 33.9 20.7 20.7 20.7 10.0 10.0 10.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.16 0.64 0.64 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.19 0.19 0.19 Clearance Time (s)4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s)3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph)273 3258 1014 140 1989 619 241 330 237 v/s Ratio Prot c0.46 0.31 0.07 v/s Ratio Perm 0.14 0.09 0.31 0.02 0.12 c0.13 v/c Ratio 0.83 0.72 0.14 0.80 0.80 0.06 0.66 0.39 0.68 Uniform Delay, d1 21.4 6.3 3.8 14.3 14.2 10.0 19.9 18.8 20.0 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 19.0 1.4 0.3 36.6 3.4 0.2 6.3 0.8 7.5 Delay (s)40.3 7.7 4.1 50.8 17.6 10.2 26.1 19.5 27.5 Level of Service D A A D B B C B C Approach Delay (s)10.0 19.3 23.2 Approach LOS B B C Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 14.7 HCM 2000 Level of Service B HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.79 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 52.9 Sum of lost time (s)13.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 71.3% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: U.S. 41 (Tamiami Trail & Lakewood Blvd.02/18/2019 Keiser 2021 PM PK BACKGROUND Model.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 12 Movement SWT SWR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)31 56 Future Volume (vph)31 56 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 Lane Width 16 12 Total Lost time (s)4.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 Frt 0.90 Flt Protected 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot)1907 Flt Permitted 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm)1907 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.79 0.79 Adj. Flow (vph)39 71 RTOR Reduction (vph) 58 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 52 0 Turn Type NA Protected Phases 8 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 10.0 Effective Green, g (s) 10.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.19 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 360 v/s Ratio Prot 0.03 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.15 Uniform Delay, d1 17.9 Progression Factor 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.2 Delay (s)18.1 Level of Service B Approach Delay (s) 23.7 Approach LOS C Intersection Summary HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3: Guilford Rd. & US 41 (Tamiami Trail)02/18/2019 Keiser 2021 PM PK BACKGROUND Model.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 9 Movement SEU SEL SET SER NWU NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)8 47 2317 29 12 20 1555 71 21 2 18 156 Future Volume (vph)8 47 2317 29 12 20 1555 71 21 2 18 156 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s)4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.94 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 Satd. Flow (prot)1770 5073 1770 5043 1710 Flt Permitted 0.11 1.00 0.11 1.00 0.80 Satd. Flow (perm)208 5073 208 5043 1397 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.71 0.71 0.92 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.92 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 Adj. Flow (vph) 11 66 2518 41 17 28 1690 100 30 3 25 220 RTOR Reduction (vph)0020001000200 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 77 2557 0 0 45 1780 0 0 56 0 0 Turn Type Perm Perm NA Perm Perm NA Perm NA Perm Protected Phases 6 2 4 Permitted Phases 6 6 2 2 4 8 Actuated Green, G (s)35.8 35.8 35.8 35.8 14.5 Effective Green, g (s)35.8 35.8 35.8 35.8 14.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.24 Clearance Time (s)4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s)3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph)125 3062 125 3044 341 v/s Ratio Prot c0.50 0.35 v/s Ratio Perm 0.37 0.22 0.04 v/c Ratio 0.62 0.83 0.36 0.58 0.17 Uniform Delay, d1 7.4 9.4 5.9 7.2 17.6 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 20.6 2.9 7.9 0.8 0.2 Delay (s)28.0 12.3 13.8 8.0 17.9 Level of Service C B B A B Approach Delay (s)12.7 8.2 17.9 Approach LOS B A B Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 11.8 HCM 2000 Level of Service B HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.80 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 59.3 Sum of lost time (s)9.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 68.2% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min)15 c Critical Lane Group HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3: Guilford Rd. & US 41 (Tamiami Trail)02/18/2019 Keiser 2021 PM PK BACKGROUND Model.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 10 Movement SWT SWR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)3 18 Future Volume (vph)3 18 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 Total Lost time (s)4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot)1776 1583 Flt Permitted 0.69 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm)1280 1583 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.71 0.71 Adj. Flow (vph) 4 25 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 19 Lane Group Flow (vph) 224 6 Turn Type NA Perm Protected Phases 8 Permitted Phases 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 14.5 14.5 Effective Green, g (s) 14.5 14.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.24 0.24 Clearance Time (s)4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 312 387 v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm c0.17 0.00 v/c Ratio 0.72 0.02 Uniform Delay, d1 20.5 17.0 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 7.7 0.0 Delay (s) 28.2 17.0 Level of Service C B Approach Delay (s) 27.1 Approach LOS C Intersection Summary HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3: Guilford Rd. & US 41 (Tamiami Trail)02/18/2019 Keiser 2021 PM PK BACKGROUND Plus Project Model.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 13 Movement SEU SEL SET SER NWU NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)89 47 2376 29 68 21 1618 76 20 2 18 163 Future Volume (vph)89 47 2376 29 68 21 1618 76 20 2 18 163 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s)4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.94 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.98 Satd. Flow (prot)1770 5073 1770 5042 1708 Flt Permitted 0.09 1.00 0.05 1.00 0.63 Satd. Flow (perm)171 5073 100 5042 1105 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.71 0.71 0.92 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.92 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 Adj. Flow (vph) 125 66 2583 41 96 30 1759 107 28 3 25 230 RTOR Reduction (vph)002000700600 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 191 2622 0 0 126 1859 0 0 50 0 0 Turn Type Perm Perm NA Perm Perm NA Perm NA Perm Protected Phases 6 2 4 Permitted Phases 6 6 2 2 4 8 Actuated Green, G (s)74.4 74.4 74.4 74.4 18.0 Effective Green, g (s)74.4 74.4 74.4 74.4 18.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.18 Clearance Time (s)4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s)3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph)125 3722 73 3699 196 v/s Ratio Prot 0.52 0.37 v/s Ratio Perm 1.12 c1.26 0.05 v/c Ratio 1.53 0.70 1.73 0.50 0.26 Uniform Delay, d1 13.5 7.4 13.5 5.7 35.9 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 273.8 1.1 377.5 0.5 0.7 Delay (s)287.3 8.6 391.0 6.2 36.6 Level of Service F A F A D Approach Delay (s)27.5 30.5 36.6 Approach LOS C C D Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 31.5 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.57 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 101.4 Sum of lost time (s)9.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 78.6% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min)15 c Critical Lane Group HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3: Guilford Rd. & US 41 (Tamiami Trail)02/18/2019 Keiser 2021 PM PK BACKGROUND Plus Project Model.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 14 Movement SWT SWR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)3 18 Future Volume (vph)3 18 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 Total Lost time (s)4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot)1775 1583 Flt Permitted 0.74 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm)1379 1583 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.71 0.71 Adj. Flow (vph) 4 25 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 21 Lane Group Flow (vph) 234 4 Turn Type NA Perm Protected Phases 8 Permitted Phases 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 18.0 18.0 Effective Green, g (s) 18.0 18.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.18 0.18 Clearance Time (s)4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 244 281 v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm c0.17 0.00 v/c Ratio 0.96 0.02 Uniform Delay, d1 41.3 34.4 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 45.7 0.0 Delay (s) 87.0 34.4 Level of Service F C Approach Delay (s) 81.9 Approach LOS F Intersection Summary HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: U.S. 41 (Tamiami Trail & Lakewood Blvd.02/18/2019 Keiser 2021 PM PK BACKGROUND Plus Project Model.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 15 Movement SEU SEL SET SER NWU NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)89 165 2192 180 50 39 1505 78 126 61 42 127 Future Volume (vph)89 165 2192 180 50 39 1505 78 126 61 42 127 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Total Lost time (s)4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.94 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot)3433 5085 1583 1770 5085 1583 1770 1749 1770 Flt Permitted 0.77 1.00 1.00 0.21 1.00 1.00 0.68 1.00 0.67 Satd. Flow (perm)2780 5085 1583 388 5085 1583 1272 1749 1255 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.79 0.79 0.92 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.92 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 Adj. Flow (vph)113 209 2383 228 63 49 1636 99 159 77 53 161 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 89 0 0 0 59 0100 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 322 2383 139 0 112 1636 40 159 129 0 161 Turn Type Perm Prot NA Perm Perm Perm NA Perm Perm NA Perm Protected Phases 1 6 2 4 Permitted Phases 6 6 2 2 2 4 8 Actuated Green, G (s)5.2 28.9 28.9 19.2 19.2 19.2 9.6 9.6 9.6 Effective Green, g (s)5.2 28.9 28.9 19.2 19.2 19.2 9.6 9.6 9.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.11 0.61 0.61 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.20 0.20 0.20 Clearance Time (s)4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s)3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph)304 3093 963 156 2055 639 257 353 253 v/s Ratio Prot c0.47 0.32 0.07 v/s Ratio Perm 0.12 0.09 0.29 0.03 0.12 c0.13 v/c Ratio 1.06 0.77 0.14 0.72 0.80 0.06 0.62 0.37 0.64 Uniform Delay, d1 21.1 6.9 4.0 11.9 12.4 8.6 17.3 16.3 17.4 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 68.1 1.9 0.3 24.6 3.3 0.2 4.4 0.6 5.2 Delay (s)89.2 8.8 4.3 36.5 15.7 8.8 21.7 17.0 22.5 Level of Service F A A D B A C B C Approach Delay (s)17.3 16.6 19.6 Approach LOS B B B Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 17.3 HCM 2000 Level of Service B HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.83 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 47.5 Sum of lost time (s)13.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 72.2% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: U.S. 41 (Tamiami Trail & Lakewood Blvd.02/18/2019 Keiser 2021 PM PK BACKGROUND Plus Project Model.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 16 Movement SWT SWR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)31 60 Future Volume (vph)31 60 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 Lane Width 16 12 Total Lost time (s)4.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 Frt 0.90 Flt Protected 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot)1902 Flt Permitted 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm)1902 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.79 0.79 Adj. Flow (vph)39 76 RTOR Reduction (vph) 37 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 78 0 Turn Type NA Protected Phases 8 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 9.6 Effective Green, g (s) 9.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.20 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 384 v/s Ratio Prot 0.04 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.20 Uniform Delay, d1 15.8 Progression Factor 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.3 Delay (s)16.0 Level of Service B Approach Delay (s) 19.8 Approach LOS B Intersection Summary TDM STRATEGY MEMO   Dated May 22, 2019     2350 Stanford Court ■ Naples, Florida 34112 (239) 434-0333 ■ Fax (239) 434-9320 SINCE 1 946 The proposed Keiser University is located within the South U.S. 41 Transportation Concurrency Exemption Area (TCEA) as indicated on map TR-4 of the Growth Management Plan. Developments located on properties in this area may be exempt from transportation concurrency requirements if impacts to the transportation system are mitigated using the procedures set forth in Policy 5.5 of the Transportation Element. The proposed development intends to comply with this policy by providing certification to Collier County that at least four Transportation Demand Management (TDM) strategies be utilized. The proposed development anticipates using the following four Transportation Demand Management strategies: 1. Preferential parking for carpools and vanpools that is expected to increase the average vehicle occupancy for work trips generated by the development. 2. Flexible class schedules that are expected to reduce peak hour automobile work trips generated by the development. 3. Telecommuting that would be expected to reduce the vehicle miles of travel and peak hour work trips generated by the development. 4. Bicycle and pedestrian facilities that would be expected to reduce vehicle miles of travel and automobile work trips generated by the development. Thank you for your assistance in reviewing this transportation impact statement. I hope that this memo has adequately addressed your comments and the traffic impact statement can now be considered sufficient. If you have any questions, please contact me at 239-461-2481 or jjh@johnsoneng.com. Sincerely, JOHNSON ENGINEERING, INC Joshua Hildebrand, P.E., PTOE TO: Mike Sawyer DATE: 5/22/2019 FROM: Josh Hildebrand RE: Keiser University TIS – PL20180003543 ENVIRONMENTAL DATA     L:\20180000\20181273-000 - Keenan Development (ZVL and Due Diligence)\-001 Environmental\Keenan Parcel Env Assessment_24Jan19 (ab).docx KEISER UNIVERSITY – NAPLES CAMPUS COLLIER COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL SUPPLEMENT January 2019 Prepared For: Keenan Development Group 1900 West Commercial Boulevard, Suite 200 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309 Prepared by: 2350 Stanford Court Naples, Florida 34112   i    TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 1 Collier County Land Development Code Section 3.08.00A.2. Applicant Information ...................................................................... 1 Section 3.08.00A.4.a Wetlands .......................................................................................... 2 Section 3.08.00A.4.b Listed Species .................................................................................. 2 Section 3.08.00A.4.c Native Vegetation Preservation ....................................................... 2 Section 4.06.04 Trees and Vegetation Protection ...................................................... 4 GMP Consistency Determination ........................................................................................ 5 LIST OF TABLES Table 1 Habitat/FLUCFCS Types and Acreages ...................................................... 3 Table 2 Native Tree Summary ................................................................................... 5 LIST OF ATTACHMENTS Attachment A Environmental Drawings Attachment B Resume Attachment C Protected Species Survey Keenan Development Group Supporting Environmental Information Keiser University Naples Campus 1    INTRODUCTION Keenan Development Group, Inc. proposes to construct a Naples campus for Keiser University on property located on the north side of Tamiami Trail approximately 0.9 miles east of Airport Pulling Road. The project is located in Section 13, Township 50 South, Range 25 East in Collier County, Florida with central coordinates of 26°3.36” North and 81°45’23.08” West. Land uses surrounding the project area include existing commercial to the northwest, southwest and southeast along with existing residential and golf course community to the northeast. Supporting maps and graphic including the following are provided in Attachment A. 1 Location Map 2 Soils Map 3 FLUCFCS Map 4 Topographic Map 5 Site Plan 6 Tree Survey Collier County Land Development Code Section 3.08.00 3.08.00.A.2 Applicant Information i. Preparation of Environmental Data. Environmental Data Submittal Requirements shall be prepared by an individual with academic credentials and experience in the area of environmental sciences or natural resource management. Academic credentials and experience shall be a bachelor's or higher degree in one of the biological sciences with at least two years of ecological or biological professional experience in the State of Florida. Environmental Data has been prepared by A. Gary Nychyk, Johnson Engineering, Inc. Ecologist. A copy of Mr. Nychyk’s resume is provided as Attachment B. ii. Owner(s)/agent(s) name, address, phone number, and e-mail. Owner: Ki-Li Associates, LLC 18930 Balmore Pines LN Cornelius, North Carolina, 28031 Applicant: Keenan Development Group 1900 West Commercial Boulevard, Suite 200 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309 Keenan Development Group Supporting Environmental Information Keiser University Naples Campus 2    3.08.00.A.4.a Wetlands i. Identify on a current aerial, the location and acreage of all Collier County/SFWMD jurisdictional wetlands according to the Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS). No jurisdictional wetlands exist on the subject site. 3.08.00.A.4.b Listed Species i. Provide a wildlife survey for the nests of bald eagle and for listed species known to inhabit biological communities similar to those existing on site. The survey shall be conducted in accordance with the guidelines or recommendations of the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FFWCC) and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). Survey times may be reduced or waived where an initial habitat assessment by the environmental consultant indicates that the likelihood of listed species occurrence is low, as determined by the FFWCC and USFWS. Where an initial habitat assessment by the environmental consultant indicates that the likelihood of listed species occurrence is low, the survey time may be reduced or waived by the County Manager or designee, when the project is not reviewed or technical assistance not provided by the FFWCC and USFWS. Additional survey time may be required if listed species are discovered. The Keiser University of Naples Protected Species Survey (Attachment C) provides detailed information regarding potential and observed protected species. ii. Provide a survey for listed plants identified in LDC section 3.04.03. A survey for plants listed in Section 3.04.03 is included in the Protected Species Survey. 3.08.00.A.4.c Native Vegetation Preservation i. For sites or portions of sites cleared of native vegetation or in agricultural operation, provide documentation that the parcel(s) were issued a permit to be cleared and are in compliance with the 25 year rezone limitation pursuant to LDC section 10.02.06. For sites permitted to be cleared prior to July 2003, provide documentation that the parcel(s) are in compliance with the 10 year rezone limitation previously identified in the GMP. Criteria defining native vegetation and determining the legality, process and criteria for clearing are found in LDC Chapter3 and LDC section 10.02.06. The native preservation requirement for the proposed Keiser University project was determined to be 15% of existing native vegetation based on the Future Land Use of the project. However, the understory and groundcover strata have been removed. Collier County records indicate that a Vegetation Removal Permit (VRP PL20140002407) was issued for the project area to remove exotic vegetation in accordance with the LDC on November 10, 2014. Collier County records also indicate that a Code Enforcement Keenan Development Group Supporting Environmental Information Keiser University Naples Campus 3    complaint (CEVR20150002646) was issued on February 10, 2015 for using heavy machinery to remove vegetation from areas marked for hand removal only. It appears that the County closed the Code Enforcement case on March 19, 2017 after an inspection of the site revealed that the inspector “observed trees that had been damaged are all doing well, no dead or dying trees observed” and the Outcome of the inspection was listed as “Compliant”. ii. Identify on a current aerial the acreage, location and community types of all upland and wetland habitats on the project site, according to the Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS), and provide a legend for each of the FLUCFCS Codes identified. Aerials and overlay information must be legible at the scale provided. Provide calculations for the acreage of native vegetation required to be retained on-site. A Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS) map has been included at a scale of one inch equals one hundred feet (1" = 100') for the property and overlain on a 2018 digital aerial photograph. The Aerial Photograph and FLUCFCS Map are included on Sheet 3 of Attachment B. Table 1 provides a summary of the habitat types found within the project. Table 1: Habitat/FLUCFCS Types and Acreage FLUCFCS Description Acreage 191 Undeveloped Land within Urban Areas 4.61 4341 Hardwood-Conifer Mixed; Disturbed – Canopy Coverage 10-24% 0.52 4342 Hardwood-Conifer Mixed; Disturbed – Canopy Coverage 25-49% 0.70 Following is a description of the three (3) base FLUCFCS types identified within the project area. The descriptions represent the overall vegetative/land use conditions and do not include the modifying levels of disturbance and/or exotic infestation. FLUCFCS 191 – Undeveloped Land (4.61 ac.) This coverage area is nearly devoid of canopy and mid-story strata. Canopy and mid-story species where present include scattered slash pine (Pinus elliottii), cabbage palm (Sabal palmetto), earleaf acacia (Acacia auriculiformis), lead tree (Lecuaena leucocephala) and Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolius). Groundcover includes tropical Mexican clover (Richardia brasiliensis), Guinea grass (Urochloa maxima), smutgrass (Sporobolus indicus), beggarticks (Bidens alba), shrubby false buttonweed (Spermacoce verticillata), painted leaf (Euphorbia cyathophora) knotroot foxtail (Setaria sp.), prickly pear (Opuntia humifusa) and coastal sandbur (Cenchrus spinifex) along with other species common to disturbed sandy uplands. Keenan Development Group Supporting Environmental Information Keiser University Naples Campus 4    FLUCFCS 4341 – Hardwood Conifer Mix – Canopy Coverage 10 – 24% (0.52 ac.) This coverage area includes scattered slash pine, cabbage palm, live oak and sand live oak (Quercus geminata) providing between 10% and 24% canopy coverage. Understory is sparse but includes sand live oak and cabbage palm. Groundcover has been disturbed and is similar to the undeveloped land described above with tropical Mexican clover, shrubby false buttonweed, coastal sand bur and smutgrass. Caesarweed (Urena lobata) running oak (Quercus pumila), rosary pea (Abrus precatorius), greenbriar (Smilax sp.) poison ivy (Toxicodendron radicans) and ticktrefoil (Desmodium sp.) along with other species commonly found in disturbed uplands were also observed in the groundcover stratum. FLUCFCS 4342 – Hardwood Conifer Mix – Canopy Coverage 25 – 49% (0.70 ac) This coverage area is similar to that described above, but canopy coverage of slash pine, oak and cabbage palm ranges between 25% and 49%. Groundcover includes Mexican clover, smutgrass, shrubby false buttonweed caesarweed and other species commonly found in disturbed uplands. Section 4.06.04 – Trees and Vegetation Protection All vegetation clearing activities will be in accordance with the approved SDP only after a Vegetation Removal Permit has been obtained through County Staff. Keenan Development Group Supporting Environmental Information Keiser University Naples Campus 5    GMP Consistency Determination Conservation and Coastal Management Element consistency: Policy 6.1.1 The project area includes approximately 1.22 acres of disturbed Hardwood-Conifer mix habitat with canopy species comprised of slash pine, oak and cabbage palm with approximately 0.70 acres of native canopy coverage greater than 25%. Section 3.05.07.B.1 of the LDC requires the retention of 15% of native vegetation communities with 25% canopy coverage on commercial development over five acres, equating to the preservation of 0.105 acres. However, the understory and groundcover strata have been removed over the entire site. The site is currently maintained by mowing, thus altering the understory and groundcover strata and allowing exotic and nuisance species to outcompete natives. Section 3.05.07.A.2 allows for the retention of native trees if the groundcover stratum has been removed. This section requires the retention of 15% of native trees that meet specified size standards. A Tree Survey map is included on Sheet 6 of Attachment B showing the location and size of existing trees and Table 2 summarizes the tree survey. Table 2: Native Tree Summary Species Total Threshold Total over threshold 15% of Preserved Trees Slash Pine 101 8" dbh 93 13.95 14 Oak 12 18" dbh 0 0 0 Sabal Palm 55 8' ct 55 8.25 9 dbh Diameter at breast height ct Clear trunk As shown in Table 2, a total of 14 slash pine and nine sabal palms are required as native tree preservation. Due to the size of the project area along with stormwater management design, existing easements and required infrastructure and sandy soils found on the site, the retention of the native trees in place is not practicable. To compensate for the removal of native trees, the applicant proposes to plant native trees within areas to be used as dry stormwater management in accordance with the table above and maintained in perpetuity. Policy 6.1.4: All invasive exotic vegetation will be removed from the project site during the development process. The site will be maintained free of invasive exotic species in accordance with permit conditions in perpetuity. Policy 6.1.7: Native vegetation will be incorporated into the landscape designs as required by the LDC. Native vegetation has been retained as depicted in the Native Vegetation Map. Keenan Development Group Supporting Environmental Information Keiser University Naples Campus 6    Policy 6.1.8: The Keiser University project is located within the Urban Residential land use district. This document provides an objective evaluation of the impacts associated with the proposed development. The information within this evaluation will aide in planning and zoning decisions related to natural resources and environmental quality of the project. Objective 6.2 The Keiser university project area does not include wetlands; therefore, no further analysis is provided. Policy 7.1.2 A Protected Species Survey has been completed for the site and is attached as Attachment C. No signs of federal, state or local listed species were observed during the survey Policy 7.1.4 No signs of state or federal listed species were observed during the Protected Species Survey.       ATTACHMENT A RESUME A. GARY NYCHYK ECOLOGIST agn@johnsonseng.com 239.461.2464 YEARS EXPERIENCE 14 years EDUCATION /CERTIFICATIONS B.S. MARINE BIOLOGY, 1998 UNIVERSITY OF WEST FLORIDA AUTHORIZED GOPHER TORTOISE AGENT, FFWCC (GTA-18-00060) PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONALS ESTERO BAY AGENCY ON BAY MANAGEMENT Gary Nychyk worked as an Ecologist with Johnson Engineering, Inc. (JEI) from January 2004 through September 2006. He rejoined JEI in February 2015. His duties include vegetation mapping, wildlife surveys, track surveys, protected species management plans, wetland jurisdictional delineations, wetland mitigation monitoring, prescribed burning, and exotic vegetation control. Mr. Nychyk works closely with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the South Florida Water Management District, Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Lee County Port Authority, as well as local city and county government agencies.  Project Experience • Florida Bonneted Bat acoustic and cavity tree surveys for several southwest Florida clients. • NPDES annual compliance inspection and training for Southwest Florida International Airport and Page Field. • Gopher Tortoise permitting, surveys and relocation for several area developers. • Babcock Community vegetation, wildlife, bird call, and frog species monitoring programs. • Habitat for Humanity of Collier County Faith Landing preserve area monitoring. • Habitat for Humanity of Collier County Kaicasa wildlife surveys and permitting. While away from JEI, Mr. Nychyk was a Senior Planner and Acting Director for the Wasco County Planning Department. Mr. Nychyk prepared amendments to Land Use and Development Ordinances and Comprehensive Plan, managed Planning Department staff, and reviewed Land Use Applications against applicable county regulations. Prior to employment with JEI, Mr. Nychyk was a Senior Environmental Planner with the Lee County Department of Community Development, Division of Environmental Sciences. Mr. Nychyk coordinated Vegetation Removal Permitting, and Agricultural Notices of Clearing. He also reviewed local development orders for compliance with the Lee County Land Development Code, and planned development rezoning cases before the Lee County Board of County Commissioners, and the Bonita Springs City Counsel. Mr. Nychyk also reviewed protected species surveys and management plans and performed helicopter and vehicle based monitoring surveys for southern bald eagle nest locations throughout Lee County.       ATTACHMENT B ENVIRONMENTAL DRAWINGS LOCATION MAPKeenan Development GroupCollier County, FloridaLEE COUNTYPROJECTLOCATIONHENDRY COUNTYMONROE COUNTYDADE COUNTYBROWARD COUNTYPROJECTLOCATIONPROJECTLOCATION 3632NO. DESCRIPTION JOHNSON ENGINEERING, INC.2350 STANFORD COURTNAPLES, FLORIDA 34112PHONE: (239) 434-0333FAX: (239) 334-3661E.B. #642 & L.B. #642DATE:PROJECT NO.FILE NO.SCALE:SHEET NUMBERREVISIONS JANUARY 201920181273-00113-50-25AS SHOWNKeenan Development GroupSOILS MAP2Keiser University - Naples Campus Collier County, FloridaSOILS LEGENDSOIL IDDESCRIPTIONHYDRIC NO. DESCRIPTION JOHNSON ENGINEERING, INC.2350 STANFORD COURTNAPLES, FLORIDA 34112PHONE: (239) 434-0333FAX: (239) 334-3661E.B. #642 & L.B. #642DATE:PROJECT NO.FILE NO.SCALE:SHEET NUMBERREVISIONS JANUARY 201920181273-00113-50-25AS SHOWNKeenan Development GroupFLUCFCS MAP3Keiser University - Naples Campus Collier County, Florida 1914341434243424341 N39°05'20"W(D)N39°07'19"W(C) 200.00'(C)(D)N05°51'11"E(C) 1 4 7 . 0 1 ' ( C ) ( D ) N05°53'10"E(D)S50°54'40"W(D)S50°52'41"W(C) 496.39'(C)(D)N5 0 ° 5 2 ' 4 1 "E (C ) 4 0 0 . 0 0 ' (C ) (D )N5 0 ° 5 4 ' 4 0 "E (D )N39°07'19"W 627.00'(C)N05°58'44"E 14 6 . 6 1 ' ( M )N40°25'19"W(D)N40°27'18"W(C) 323.10'(C)(D)N40°26'44"W 323.60'(M)NO. DESCRIPTION JOHNSON ENGINEERING, INC.2350 STANFORD COURTNAPLES, FLORIDA 34112PHONE: (239) 434-0333FAX: (239) 334-3661E.B. #642 & L.B. #642DATE:PROJECT NO.FILE NO.SCALE:SHEET NUMBERREVISIONS JANUARY 201920181273-00113-50-25AS SHOWN4KEENAN DEVELOPMENT GROUPBOUNDARY ANDTOPOGRAPHICSURVEYKeiser University - Naples Campus Collier County, Florida 0 ·& ROCKPORT NAPLES, LtG ET AL IC-31 15' TYPE - D LANDSCAPEBUFFER � EXISTING Q 20' UTILITY'l� EASEMENT �)-,.4;:; IC-31 POTENTIAL FUTURE ----. INTERCONNECT (TYP) 15' SIDE SETBACK MONUMENT -�-----'�LiQ�SIGN � � �� PEDESTRIAN �---¾;�___,;� CONNECTION �1-EXISTING 20' UTILITY EASEMENT OPEN SPACE Required : 30% Provided : 34% * * Consisting of Water Management, Utility Easements, and Landscape Buffer Areas. DRY DETENTION (0.90 ACRES) GRASSEDPARKING GLADES COUNTRY CLUB / / / / / 0 25 50 100 (INTENDED DISPLAY SCALE: 1"=100') 15' REAR SETBACK / DUMPSTERS/ , LAKEWOOD VIL I RMF-61 AREA OF POTENTIAL NATIVEVEGETATION PRESERVATION / REPLANTING LEGEND b----l LANDSCAPE BUFFER D UTILITY EASEMENT D PROPOSED PAVEMENT Cl CONCRETE SIDEWALK D PROPOSED BUILDING D GRASSED PARKING I > < I DRY DETENTION cg LOADING SPACE 1 O'x20' Area Summary Item Area % of (AC) Total 2 Story Building (Keiser U.) 0.46 7.88 2 Story Building (Keiser U.) 0.29 4.97 Pavement & Sidewalks 2.28 39.04 Dry Detention 0.83 14.21 Landscape Areas & Easements 1.17 20.03 Grassed Parking 0.25 4.28 PAT IOT SQUARE, LLC Other Pervious Total Acreage 0.56 9.59 5.84 100% IC-31 / 1/ UNITS Keiser University Main Bldg. 40,000 SF Keiser University Bldg. 2 25,000 SF Bicycle Parking Grossed Parking TOTAL PARKING SUMMARY PARKING RATIO PARKING REQUIRED 134 Total 1 Space / 300 SF 5 Handicapped 3 Loading 84 Total Spaces 1 Space / 300 SF 4 Handicapped 5% Total N/A 3 Loading 11 N/A 218 Total Paved Spaces 9 Handicapped 6 Loading 11 Bicycle 0 Grassed •Paved parking is less than 120% of LDC required parking. PARKING PROVIDED 140 Total Spaces 5 Handicapped 3 Loading 92 Total Spaces 4 Handicapped 3 Loading 11 65 232 Total Paved Spaces• 9 Handicapped 6 Loading 11 Bicycle 67 Grassed JOHNS E N G I N E E R ;l�� JOHNSON ENGINEERING, INC. 2350 STANFORD COURT NAPLES, FLORIDA34112 PHONE: (239) 434-0333 FAX: (239) 334-3661 E.B. #642 & L.B. #642 a..=>00::(!)1-z w�a..0.....J w > w z <( z w w ::::.:::: en ::::, a. E ct! ct! () "O en ·;::: Q) 0 a.LL ct! -zz, I C: >, ::::, _. 0 ·� ()Q) L.. > .92·c ==> 0 L.. () Q) en DATE: DECEMBER 2018 PROJECT NO. 20181273-001 FILE NO. 13-50-25 SCALE: AS SHOWN Conditional Use Site Plan SHEET NUMBER 5 NO. DESCRIPTION JOHNSON ENGINEERING, INC.2350 STANFORD COURTNAPLES, FLORIDA 34112PHONE: (239) 434-0333FAX: (239) 334-3661E.B. #642 & L.B. #642DATE:PROJECT NO.FILE NO.SCALE:SHEET NUMBERREVISIONS JANUARY 201920181273-00113-50-25AS SHOWN6KEENAN DEVELOPMENT GROUPTREE SURVEYKeiser University - Naples Campus Collier County, FloridaSOILS LEGENDSOIL IDDESCRIPTIONHYDRIC       ATTACHMENT C PROTECTED SPECIES SURVEY KEISER UNIVERSITY – NAPLES CAMPUS Protected Species Survey January 2019 Prepared for: Keenan Development Group 1900 West Commercial Boulevard, Suite 200 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309 Prepared by: 2350 Stanford Court Naples, Florida 34112 -i- TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................... 1 2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS ............................................................................ 3 3.0 SURVEY METHODOLOGY ....................................................................... 7 4.0 RESULTS/DISCUSSION.............................................................................. 10 5.0 REFERENCES .............................................................................................. 15 FIGURES Figure 1 Project Location Map ......................................................................... 2 Figure 2 Soils Map ........................................................................................... 4 Figure 3 FLUCFCS Map .................................................................................. 5 Figure 4 Potential Protected Species Map ........................................................ 8 Figure 5 Protected Species Survey Map ........................................................... 11 TABLES Table 2-1 Vegetation Associations and Acreages .............................................. 3 Table 3-1 Potential Protected Species ................................................................ 7 Table 3-2 Dates, Times, Conditions and Purpose of Field Surveys ................... 9 Table 4-1 Protected Species Survey Results ...................................................... 12 Table 4-2 Non-listed Wildlife Observed on the Property .................................. 12 Table 4-3 Panther Habitat Unit Analysis ........................................................... 13 Keenan Development Group, Inc. – Keiser University June 2017 Protected Species Survey -1- 1.0 INTRODUCTION Keenan Development Group, Inc. proposes to construct a Naples campus for Keiser University on 5.83 acres located on the north side of Tamiami Trail approximately 0.9 miles east of Airport Pulling Road. The project is located in Section 13, Township 50 South, Range 25 East in Collier County, Florida with central coordinates of 26°7’3.36” North and 81°45’23.08” West. Please refer to Figure 1 for a Project Location Map. Land uses surrounding the project area include existing commercial to the northwest, southwest and southeast along with existing residential and golf course community to the northeast. Johnson Engineering, Inc. ecologists conducted a protected species survey (PSS) on the subject property on January 28, 2019. Pedestrian transects were established to cover approximately 60% of each suitable habitat within the project area. The purpose of the survey was to identify and document the presence of any plant or wildlife species listed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) and Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) as endangered, threatened, species of special concern, or commercially exploited. This report represents the results of the PSS prepared in accordance with Collier County and FWC approved methods for conducting protected species surveys and for gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) burrow surveys, as provided in the Gopher Tortoise Permitting Guidelines [FWC, 2017]. LOCATION MAPKeenan Development GroupCollier County, FloridaLEE COUNTYPROJECTLOCATIONHENDRY COUNTYMONROE COUNTYDADE COUNTYBROWARD COUNTYPROJECTLOCATIONPROJECTLOCATION Keenan Development Group – Keiser University January 2019 Protected Species Survey -3- 2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS Through mapping and classifying the various vegetative habitats occurring onsite, qualified determinations can be made with regard to the presence of protected species. The cover and vegetation association types within the 5.83-acre property were delineated using Collier County 2018 digital aerial photographs, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Soil Survey Maps for Collier County (Figure 2), and field observations. The habitat types were classified according to Levels III and IV of the Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS) [Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), 1999]. The resulting FLUCFCS and Protected Species Survey Map is provided in Figure 3. The approximate acreages for the various FLUCFCS Codes within the additional lands can be found in Table 2-1. A brief description of each surveyed FLUCFCS Code follows Figure 3. Table 2-1: Vegetation Associations and Acreages FLUCFCS Description Acreage Federal Status State Status 191 Undeveloped Land within Urban Areas 4.61 U U 4341 Hardwood-Conifer Mix, Disturbed Canopy Coverage 10-24% 0.52 U U 4342 Hardwood-Conifer Mix, Disturbed Canopy Coverage 25-49% 0.70 U U Total 5.83 Legend U = Upland 3632NO. DESCRIPTION JOHNSON ENGINEERING, INC.2350 STANFORD COURTNAPLES, FLORIDA 34112PHONE: (239) 434-0333FAX: (239) 334-3661E.B. #642 & L.B. #642DATE:PROJECT NO.FILE NO.SCALE:SHEET NUMBERREVISIONS JANUARY 201920181273-00113-50-25AS SHOWNKeenan Development GroupSOILS MAP2Keiser University - Naples Campus Collier County, FloridaSOILS LEGENDSOIL IDDESCRIPTIONHYDRIC NO. DESCRIPTION JOHNSON ENGINEERING, INC.2350 STANFORD COURTNAPLES, FLORIDA 34112PHONE: (239) 434-0333FAX: (239) 334-3661E.B. #642 & L.B. #642DATE:PROJECT NO.FILE NO.SCALE:SHEET NUMBERREVISIONS JANUARY 201920181273-00113-50-25AS SHOWNKeenan Development GroupFLUCFCS MAP3Keiser University - Naples Campus Collier County, Florida 1914341434243424341 Keenan Development Group – Keiser University January 2019 Protected Species Survey -6- FLUCFCS 191 – Undeveloped Land (4.61 ac.) This coverage area is nearly devoid of canopy and mid-story strata. Canopy and mid-story species where present include scattered slash pine (Pinus elliottii), cabbage palm (Sabal palmetto), earleaf acacia (Acacia auriculiformis), lead tree (Lecuaena leucocephala) and Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolius). Groundcover includes tropical Mexican clover (Richardia brasiliensis), Guinea grass (Urochloa maxima), smutgrass (Sporobolus indicus), beggarticks (Bidens alba), shrubby false buttonweed (Spermacoce verticillata), painted leaf (Euphorbia cyathophora) knotroot foxtail (Setaria sp.), prickly pear (Opuntia humifusa) and coastal sandbur (Cenchrus spinifex). FLUCFCS 4341 – Hardwood Conifer Mix – Canopy Coverage 10 – 24% (0.52 ac.) This coverage area includes scattered slash pine, cabbage palm and sand live oak (Quercus geminata) providing between 10% and 24% canopy coverage. Understory is sparse but includes sand live oak and cabbage palm. Groundcover is similar that the undeveloped land described above with tropical Mexican clover, shrubby false buttonweed, coastal sand bur and smutgrass, but also includes Caesarweed (Urena lobata) running oak (Quercus pumila), rosary pea (Abrus precatorius), greenbriar (Smilax sp.) poison ivy (Toxicodendron radicans) and ticktrefoil (Desmodium sp.) along with other species commonly found in disturbed uplands. FLUCFCS 4342 – Hardwood Conifer Mix – Canopy Coverage 25 – 49% (0.70 ac) This coverage area is similar to that described above, but canopy coverage of slash pine, oak and cabbage palm ranges between 25% and 49%. Groundcover includes Mexican clover, smutgrass, shrubby false buttonweed caesarweed and other species commonly found in disturbed uplands. Keenan Development Group – Keiser University January 2019 Protected Species Survey -7- 3.0 SURVEY METHODOLOGY The PSS included field surveys and a literature review. Literature review sources included Florida’s Endangered Species, Threatened Species and Species of Special Concern [FWC, 2017], Florida Natural Areas Inventory [FNAI], U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Environmental Conservation Online System (ECOS), as well as the Collier County Land Development Code. Based on the literature review, a compilation of federal and state protected species was developed. Table 3-1 lists potential listed species commonly associated with the vegetative communities observed onsite. Figure 4 provides an analysis of potential protected species for the project area, based on documented occurrences of listed species and consultation zones available from the previously mentioned agencies. Table 3-1 Potential Protected Species. Upland Prairie FLUCFCS Common Name (Scientific name) Status 191 Gopher Tortoise Gopherus polyphemus ST Eastern Indigo Snake Drymarchon carais couperi FT Florida Pine Snake Pituophis melanoleucus mugitus ST Florida Sandhill Crane Antigone canadensis pratensis ST Florida Burrowing Owl Athene cunicularia floridana ST Southeastern American Kestrel Falco sparverius paulus ST Florida Panther Puma concolor coryi FE Upland Forest 4341 4342 Eastern Indigo Snake Drymarchon carais couperi FT Florida Pine Snake Pituophis melanoleucus mugitus ST Red-Cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis FE Big Cypress Fox Squirrel Sciurus niger avicennia ST Florida Bonneted Bat Eumops floridanus FE Florida Panther Puma concolor coryi FE Cowhorn Orchid Cyrtopodium punctatum SE Butterfly Orchid Encyclia tampensis SC Stiff Leaved Wild Pine Tillandsia fasciculate SE Giant Wild Pine, Giant Air Plant Tillandsia utriculata SE Fuzzy-wuzzy Air Plant Tillandsia pruinosa SE Twisted Air Plant Tillandsia flexuosa ST Legend: S – State of Florida F – Federal T – Threatened E – Endangered C – Commercially Exploited S/A – Similarity in Appearance Keenan Development Group – Keiser University January 2019 Protected Species Survey -9- Field surveys were conducted utilizing pedestrian belt transects. Transects were performed in all vegetation associations (FLUCFCS) and the distances between transects were established to cover a minimum of 60% of each habitat type within the project area. The PSS was conducted in accordance with standard FWC survey guidelines as well as methods outlined in the Gopher Tortoise Permitting Guidelines [FWC, 2017]. Table 3-2 lists the times and weather conditions during the field survey. Table 3-2 Dates, Times, Conditions and Purpose of Field Surveys. Date Time Weather Conditions Purpose Staff 9/17/2018 1:00 p.m. – 3:30 p.m. Mostly sunny, Temperature mid 80s F, Winds from ENE at 5 - 10 mph. Initial Investigation AGN 1/28/2019 9:00 a.m. – 1:00 p.m. Cloudy, Temperature in the mid 50s F, Winds from NNW at 10 mph. Protected Species Survey AGN 1/31/2019 8:30 a.m. – 10:30 a.m. Partly cloudy, Temperature in the low 60s F, Winds from NE at 11mph. Roost Survey AGN AGN – A. Gary Nychyk Keenan Development Group – Keiser University January 2019 Protected Species Survey -10- 4.0 RESULTS/DISCUSSION Table 4-1 summarizes the findings of the PSS performed for the Keiser University project. The Protected Species Survey Map is provided as Figure 5 and includes a depiction of pedestrian transects. Several non-listed species were also observed during the PSS and are outlined in Table 4-2. Gopher Tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) Gopher tortoises are listed as Threatened by the State and as a candidate species for possible federal listing under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) by FWS. Gopher tortoises are most often found on well-drained sandy soils in upland habitats with low-growing herbs. No signs of gopher tortoises or their burrows were observed during the survey. Eastern Indigo Snake (Drymarchon corais couperi) The eastern indigo snake is listed as Threatened by both FWS and FWC. Eastern indigo snakes utilize a variety of habitat types to complete their life cycles including: pine flatwoods, scrub areas, hydric pine flatwoods, wet and dry prairies, agricultural fields, coastal hardwood hammocks, mangrove areas and even human altered areas can be considered habitat for the species (FWS 1999). In south Florida, the species is not as dependent on gopher tortoise burrows for over- wintering. However, they will use gopher tortoise burrows as underground refugia. In addition, the species will use armadillo burrows, natural ground holes, hollows at the base of trees, ground litter, and debris piles. Steiner et al. (1983) suggest that eastern indigo snakes in south Florida prefer hammock type environments and pine forests. No eastern indigo snakes were observed during the PSS. . 1914341434243424341NO. DESCRIPTION JOHNSON ENGINEERING, INC.2350 STANFORD COURTNAPLES, FLORIDA 34112PHONE: (239) 434-0333FAX: (239) 334-3661E.B. #642 & L.B. #642DATE:PROJECT NO.FILE NO.SCALE:SHEET NUMBERREVISIONS JANUARY 201920181273-00113-50-25AS SHOWNKeenan Development GroupPROTECTEDSPECIESSURVEY MAP5Keiser University - Naples Campus Collier County, Florida 1914341434243424341POTENTIAL ROOST Keenan Development Group – Keiser University January 2019 Protected Species Survey -12- Table 4-1 Protected Species Survey Results. Upland Prairie FLUCFCS (Common Name) Present Absent Density 191 Gopher Tortoise X Eastern Indigo Snake X Florida Pine Snake X Florida Sandhill Crane X Florida Burrowing Owl X Southeastern American Kestrel X Florida Panther X Upland Forest 4341 4342 Eastern Indigo Snake X Florida Pine Snake X Red-Cockaded Woodpecker X Big Cypress Fox Squirrel X Florida Bonneted Bat X Florida Panther X Cowhorn Orchid X Butterfly Orchid X Stiff Leaved Wild Pine X Giant Wild Pine, Giant Air Plant X Fuzzy-wuzzy Air Plant X Twisted Air Plant X Table 4-2. Non-listed Wildlife Observed on the Property Scientific Name Common Name Birds Mimus polyglottos Northern mockingbird Melanerpes carolinus Redbellied woodpecker Corvus brachyrhynchos American crow Zenaida macroura Mourning dove Lanius ludovicianus Loggerhead shrike Keenan Development Group – Keiser University January 2019 Protected Species Survey -13- Big Cypress Fox Squirrel (Sciurus niger avicennia) The Big Cypress fox squirrel (BCFS) is listed by FWC as Threatened; it is not listed by FWS. Preferred Big Cypress fox squirrel habitat consists of pine flatwoods, mixed hardwood-pine forest, and cypress swamp, with low ground cover. BCFS are known to use several habitat types for foraging, including golf courses, pastures with scattered trees and rural residential areas with wooded lots (Florida Committee on Rare and Endangered Plants and Animals – FCREPA 1992). BCFS build platform nests in slash pines and hardwoods (i.e. oak) and moss and stick nests in cypress and tops of cabbage palms. No signs of BCFS, their nests, or their signs were observed during the PSS. Florida Bonneted Bat (Eumops floridanus) Florida bonneted bats (FBB) are listed as Endangered by FWS. FBB is the largest species of bat in Florida. Although little is known about the habitat preferences of the FBB, evidence indicates that open freshwater and wetland habitats provide prime foraging areas. Roost sites have been observed in artificial bat boxes, roof tiles, and within woodpecker cavities in pines with an open midstory. The project area is within the FWS designated Consultation Area of the FBB. On January 31, 2019, a JEI ecologist performed a FBB roost survey in accordance with guidelines set forth by FWS. Three dead pines with cavities, crevices, or other deformations that could potentially be used as roosts by FBB were observed during the survey. A wireless inspection camera was used to fully inspect the bottom, sides, back, and top of each structure. Table 4-3 provides details regarding the trees and potential roost structures observed during the roost inspection. Table 4-3: Roost Survey Results No. Species / Type Tree DBH Tree Height Structure Type Structure Height Orientation Contents / Comments 1 Pine Snag 14 35 Lightning deformation 20 South Empty, fully observed 2 Pine Snag 14 20 Cavity 19 South Empty, fully observed 3 Pine Snag 12 25 Cavity 13 West Empty, fully observed Keenan Development Group – Keiser University January 2019 Protected Species Survey -14- Red-Cockaded Woodpecker (Picoides borealis) The red-cockaded woodpecker (RCW) is about seven inches long with a wingspan of about 15 inches and is listed as endangered by FWS. This black and white striped woodpecker has a black cap and nape that encircle large white cheek patches. RCWs typically inhabit open pine forests and are the only woodpeckers that excavate cavities exclusively in living pine trees. RCWs typically choose large, mature pines to excavate their cavity. The roost survey revealed no live cavity trees and no indications the property was being used by RCWs. Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) Although the bald eagle is no longer a listed species, it is afforded protection in accordance with the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act and Migratory Bird Treaty Act. The FWS has established a standard 660’ secondary and 330’ primary protection zone around a bald eagle nest for this region [FWS 2007]. Based on the FWC bald eagle nest locator (https://publictemp.myfwc.com/FWRI/EagleNests/nestlocator.aspx , site accessed Jan 29, 2019) No active bald eagle nests were documented on or within 660’ of the project site. The closest known nest is CO-040, located approximately 0.42 miles north of the project site. This distance exceeds any protection zones for bald eagles. Florida Scrub-Jay (Aphelocoma coerulescens) The Florida scrub-jay is a blue and gray bird that reaches lengths of 12 inches with a wing span of 13.5 inches (The Cornell Lab of Ornithology 2011). A blue-colored necklace surrounds their neck, separating their whiter throat from their grayish breast. Florida scrub-jays also have a gray back and underparts, along with a blue head, tail, and wings. The Florida scrub-jay is the only species of bird that is unique to Florida. Scrub-jays inhabit sand pine and xeric oak scrub, and scrubby flatwoods, which occur in some of the highest and driest areas of Florida – ancient sandy ridges that run down the middle of the state, old sand dunes along the coasts, and sandy deposits along rivers in the interior of the state. Scrub-jays do best in areas that contain large quantities of oak shrubs that average 3.28-6.56 feet (FWC, 2019). Although the project area includes oak trees, it lacks suitable stands of oak shrubs. No signs of Florida scrub-jay were observed during the survey. Keenan Development Group – Keiser University January 2019 Protected Species Survey -15- 5.0 REFERENCES Florida Committee on Rare and Endangered Plans and Animals. 1992. Rare and Endangered Biota of Florida. Volume I. Mammals. Gainesville, Florida. 392 pp. Florida Department of Transportation. 1999. Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System. Procedure No. 550-010-001-a. Third Edition. Tallahassee, Florida. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. 2011. Supplemental Information for the Big Cypress Fox Squirrel Biological Status Review Report. Tallahassee, Florida. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. 2019. Bald Eagle Nest Locator. https://public.myfwc.com/FWRI/EagleNests/nestlocator.aspx (Site accessed January 29, 2019) Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. 2019. Imperiled Species Management Plan. https://myfwc.com/wildlifehabitats/wildlife/plan/ (Site accessed January 29, 2019) Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. 2017. Gopher Tortoise Permitting Guidelines. Tallahassee, Florida. Natural Resources Conservation Service. Soil Survey of Collier County, Florida. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C. Steiner, T.M., O.L. Bass, Jr., and J.A. Kushlan. 1983. Status of the eastern indigo snake in southern Florida National Parks and vicinity. South Florida Research Center Report SFRC-83/01, Everglades National Park; Homestead, Florida. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Information for Planning and Conservation, Environmental Conservation Online System. 2019. http://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/gettingStarted/index (Site accessed January 29, 2019) U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2007. National Bald Eagle Management Guidelines. 23 pp. U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1999. South Florida Multi-Species Recovery Plan. Atlanta, Georgia. 2172 pp. ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS     PROPOSED SIGNAGE AND LIGHTING     STATEMENT OF UTILITY PROVISION     COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 5/08/2018 Page 5 of 12 STATEMENT OF UTILITY PROVISIONS FOR CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST APPLICANT INFORMATION Name of Applicant(s): ___________________________________________________________ Address: ______________________________City: ___________ State: ________ ZIP: _______ Telephone: ____________________ Cell: _____________________ Fax: __________________ E-Mail Address: ________________________________________________________________ Address of Subject Property (If available): ___________________________________________ City: ________________ State: __________ ZIP: ___________ LEGAL DESCRIPTION Section/Township/Range: / / Lot: Block: Subdivision: _______________________________________________ Plat Book: Page #: Property I.D. Number: _________________________________ Metes & Bounds Description: _____________________________________________________ TYPE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL TO BE PROVIDED Check applicable system: a. County Utility System b. City Utility System c. Franchised Utility System Provide Name: ____________________ d. Package Treatment Plant (GPD Capacity): ___________________ e. Septic System TYPE OF WATER SERVICE TO BE PROVIDED a. County Utility System b. City Utility System c. Franchised Utility System PROVIDE NAME_______________ d. Private System (Well) Total Population to be served: ____________________________________________________ Peak and Average Daily Demands: A. Water-Peak: _______ Average Daily: ________ B. Sewer-Peak: _______ Average Daily: ________ COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 5/08/2018 Page 6 of 12 If proposing to be connected to Collier County Regional Water System, please provide the date service is expected to be required: ____________________________________________ Narrative statement: Provide a brief and concise narrative statement and schematic drawing of sewage treatment process to be used as well as a specific statement regarding the method of affluent and sludge disposal. If percolation ponds are to be used, then percolation data and soil involved shall be provided from tests prepared and certified by a professional engineer. ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ County Utility Dedication Statement: If the project is located within the service boundaries of Collier County’s utility service system, a notarized statement shall be provided agreeing to dedicate the water distribution and sewage collection facilities within the project area to the Collier County Utilities. This shall occur upon completion of the construction of these facilities in accordance with all applicable County ordinances in effect at that time. This statement shall also include an agreement that the applicable system development charges and connection fees will be paid to the County Utilities Division prior to the issuance of building permits by the County. If applicable, the statement shall contain an agreement to dedicate the appropriate utility easements for serving the water and sewer systems. ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ Statement of Availability Capacity from other Providers: Unless waived or otherwise provided for at the pre-application meeting, if the project is to receive sewer or potable water services from any provider other than the County, a statement from that provider indicating adequate capacity to serve the project shall be provided. 1 Amanda Martin From:FeyEric <Eric.Fey@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent:Tuesday, April 09, 2019 6:58 PM To:Richard Yovanovich Cc:Gary F. Muller; Amanda Martin; Jared R. Brown; billk@keenandev.com; jimb@keenandev.com; lwaterhouse@keiseruniversity.edu; FinnTimothy; SmithCamden; jmartinez@naplesgov.com; ChmelikTom; BelloneJoseph; JohnssenBeth; MessnerSteve; LibbyPamela; BullertBenjamin; TeachScott; Bob Middleton; Allyson Holland Subject:RE: Water Service for Proposed Keiser University at 4001 Tamiami Trl E Richard,    I received an email from Bob Middleton, Utilities Director for the City of Naples, agreeing that our 2009 service boundary agreement needs to be amended to memorialize the service area change for this project. Please respond accordingly  and omit the City’s potable water service availability letter from your resubmittal. Collier County will be the sole water  and sewer service provider to the project.    Respectfully,    Eric Fey, P.E.  Senior Project Manager     Public Utilities Engineering & Project Management Division Continuous Improvement NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 3339 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 303, Naples, Florida 34112-5361 Phone: 239.252.1037 Cell: 239.572.0043   Engineering & Project Management Customer Service Survey   From: FeyEric   Sent: Monday, April 08, 2019 3:02 PM  To: 'aholland@naplesgov.com' <aholland@naplesgov.com>  Cc: Richard Yovanovich <ryovanovich@cyklawfirm.com>; Gary F. Muller <gfm@johnsoneng.com>;  'amartin@johnsoneng.com' <amartin@johnsoneng.com>; 'Jared R. Brown' <jrb@johnsoneng.com>;  'billk@keenandev.com' <billk@keenandev.com>; 'jimb@keenandev.com' <jimb@keenandev.com>;  'lwaterhouse@keiseruniversity.edu' <lwaterhouse@keiseruniversity.edu>; FinnTimothy  <Timothy.Finn@colliercountyfl.gov>; SmithCamden <Camden.Smith@colliercountyfl.gov>; 'jmartinez@naplesgov.com'  <jmartinez@naplesgov.com>; ChmelikTom <Tom.Chmelik@colliercountyfl.gov>; BelloneJoseph  <Joseph.Bellone@colliercountyfl.gov>; JohnssenBeth <Beth.Johnssen@colliercountyfl.gov>; MessnerSteve  <Steve.Messner@colliercountyfl.gov>; LibbyPamela <Pamela.Libby@colliercountyfl.gov>; BullertBenjamin  <Benjamin.Bullert@colliercountyfl.gov>; TeachScott <Scott.Teach@colliercountyfl.gov>  Subject: Water Service for Proposed Keiser University at 4001 Tamiami Trl E  Importance: High    2 Allyson,    We had a post‐review meeting Friday afternoon with the applicant and agents for Conditional Use petition  #PL20180003543, Keiser University Naples Campus. One of my correction comments related to the potable water  service availability letter from your department that was attached to the Statement of Utility Provisions (attached  hereto). The letter states, “The subject property is located within the City of Naples potable water service area,” and  goes on to stipulate requirements to obtain water service from the City. Yet, the Statement of Utility Provisions indicates  County water service.    According to the below service area boundary from the City of Naples Interactive Map (which I pulled from an old email  and may be outdated), the project appears to straddle the line with the larger of the two parcels (FLN 00394160009) on  the County’s side and the smaller parcel (FLN 00394200008) on the City’s:      3   Here is a screen shot from our GIS showing a closer view of the two project parcels:       The three parcels between Lakewood Unit 1 and Tamiami Trail E that are northwest of Lakewood Boulevard (FLNs  00394200008, 00394240000, and 00394440004) are in an area of overlap between what the City identifies as its water  service area and what the County claims as its water service area. (The Walmart up the road is another area of overlap.)  The basis of our claim to these parcels is the “Glades Settlement Agreement” of 1986, recorded at OR Book 1191, page  668, which predates our 2009 interlocal service boundary agreement recorded at OR Book 4443, page 1783. In Article XI  on page 26 of the 1986 agreement, the County is obligated to continue providing water and sewer service to all existing  customers of East Naples Water Systems, Inc. and to assume and be bound by certain existing written agreements of  East Naples Water Systems, Inc., including “the agreements to serve the commercial parcels east of Naples Towne  Center” [paragraph G].    The County provides water service to the properties on either side of the proposed Keiser University Naples Campus,  including the Speedway and Patriot Square plaza to the southeast, as shown below:     4   Article Two of our 2009 agreement identifies the geographic boundaries of the City’s existing water service areas. Since  the City does not have any existing customers along the frontages adjoining the project and the County does, it seems  the three aforementioned parcels should be removed from the City’s water service area boundary and that the County  should have the exclusive right to provide water service to the project. Please advise whether the City concurs.    The applicant’s agent indicated a tight timeframe for resubmittal and would appreciate an answer as soon as possible.  Feel free to call me to discuss any questions or concerns.    Respectfully,    Eric Fey, P.E.  Senior Project Manager    5  Public Utilities Engineering & Project Management Division Continuous Improvement NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 3339 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 303, Naples, Florida 34112-5361 Phone: 239.252.1037 Cell: 239.572.0043   Engineering & Project Management Customer Service Survey   Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. WATER/WASTEWATER FLOWS MEMO     Mr. Eric Fey Public Utilities EPMD 3339 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 303 RE: Conditional Use Application; PL20190003543 Keenan Development Group – Keiser University Water Demand and Wastewater Flow Wastewater Flow Per Table I of F.A.C. 64E-6.008: Schools per student (a) Day-type 10 GPD (d) Add for day school workers 15 GPD (275 Students x 10 GPD) + (65 workers x 15 GPD) = 3,725 GPD (Average) Peak Flow = 1.5* x 3,725 = 5,588 GPD OR Per Table I of F.A.C. 64E-6.008: Office building per employee per 8-hour shift, or 15 GPD per 100 square feet of floor space, whichever is greater 15 GPD (65,000 SF x 15 GPD/100 SF) = 9,750 GPD (Average) Peak Flow = 1.5* x 9,750 = 14,625 GPD Water Demand Water demand = 1.4 x Average Daily Wastewater Flow School Water demand = 1.4 x 3,725 GPD = 5,215 GPD Peak Demand = 1.35* x 5,215 = 7,040 GPD OR Office Water demand = 1.4 x 9,750 GPD = 13,650 GPD Peak Demand = 1.35* x 13,650 = 18,428 GPD *Peaking factors obtained from Collier County Water-Sewer District Master Plan (2014) CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN     L LL LL2 Story Bldg.(Educational Services orother allowed C-3 Use)25,000 SF Total Min. F. F.= 8.0' N A V D 2 S t o r y B l d g . (E d u c a t i o n a l S e r v i c e s ) 4 0 , 0 0 0 S F T o t a lMi n . F . F . = 8 . 0 ' NAVDLKEISER UNIVERSITY NAPLES CAMPUSCOLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDAConditional Use Site Plan 1 DATE: PROJECT NO. FILE NO. SCALE: SHEET NUMBERREVISIONSNO. DESCRIPTION DATEJOHNSON ENGINEERING, INC. 2350 STANFORD COURT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112 PHONE: (239) 434-0333 FAX: (239) 334-3661 E.B. #642 & L.B. #642 MAY 2019 20181273-001 13-50-25 AS NOTED LEGEND L OPEN SPACE CONDITIONAL USE SITE PLAN NOTES: * KEENAN DEVELOPMENTGROUP BOUNDARY SURVEY     DATE:PROJECT NO.FILE NO.SCALE:SHEET NUMBERREVISIONS DESCRIPTIONDATE JOHNSON ENGINEERING, INC.2350 STANFORD COURTNAPLES, FLORIDA 34112PHONE: (239) 434-0333FAX: (239) 334-3661E.B. #642 & L.B. #64201-03-1920181273-00113-50-25AS SHOWN1 OF 2SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDACOVERSHEET BOUNDARY SURVEYFORPARCEL No. 00394160009 &PARCEL No. 00394200008(OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 4333, PAGE 3803)PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDALYING INSECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EASTCOLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDAPARCEL No. 00394160009 & PARCEL No. 00394200008 (OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 4333, PAGE 3803) PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA LYING IN VICINITY MAP1"=2000' OVERALL SURVEYEDPARCEL CONTAINS(254,210 SQ. FT. / 5.836 AC., +/-)PARCEL No. 00394160009KI-LI ASSOCIATES LLC(ORB 4333, PG 3803)PARCEL 1PARCEL No. 00394200008KI-LI ASSOCIATES LLC(ORB 4333, PG 3803)PARCEL 2N39°05'20"W(D)N39°07'19"W(C) 200.00'(C)(D)N05°51'11"E(C) 1 4 7 . 0 1 ' ( C ) ( D ) N05°53'10"E(D)S50°54'40"W(D)S50°52'41"W(C) 496.39'(C)(D)N5 0 ° 5 2 ' 4 1 "E (C ) 4 0 0 . 0 0 ' (C ) (D )N5 0 ° 5 4 ' 4 0 "E (D )N39°07'19"W 627.00'(C)N05°58'44"E 14 6 . 6 1 ' ( M )PARCEL 1PARCEL 2N40°25'19"W(D)N40°27'18"W(C) 323.10'(C)(D)N40°26'44"W 323.60'(M)PARCELS 1 & 2DATE:PROJECT NO.FILE NO.SCALE:SHEET NUMBERREVISIONS DESCRIPTIONDATE JOHNSON ENGINEERING, INC.2350 STANFORD COURTNAPLES, FLORIDA 34112PHONE: (239) 434-0333FAX: (239) 334-3661E.B. #642 & L.B. #64201-03-1920181273-00113-50-251"=40'2 OF 2SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDABOUNDARY ANDTOPOGRAPHICSURVEYMATCHLINE RIGHT OF PAGEMATCHLINE LEFT OF PAGEPARCEL No. 00394160009 & PARCEL No. 00394200008 (OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 4333, PAGE 3803) PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA LYING IN – OTHER DOCUMENTATION –    SUFFICIENCY RESPONSE LETTER   Dated April 24, 2019     2350 Stanford Court ■Naples, Florida 34112 (239) 434-0333 ■ Fax (239) 434-9320 SINCE 1946       April 24, 2019    Mr. Timothy Finn, AICP  Collier County Growth Management  2800 Horseshoe Drive N  Naples, FL 34104          RE: Conditional Use Application; PL20180003543    Keenan Development Group – Keiser University    Dear Tim,    This letter is in response to your March 29, 2019 letter requesting additional information for the  referenced petition. The comments received are restated below with our responses in the same order as  given in your letter.      ENGINEERING STORMWATER REVIEW    1. Please provide a basic stormwater plan that identifies the approximate location of the projects  outfall and downstream concurrency capacity.    Response:  FDOT confirmed at the project pre‐application meeting on November 5, 2018 that  they will accept runoff from the site where post‐development rates are equal to or less than  pre‐development rates. There are two (2) drainage inlets in the US‐41 ROW along the project’s  frontage; the outfall will be at one of those two locations.        ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW    1. Provide calculations on site plan showing the tree calculations for native trees to be retained  (LDC3.05.07 A).    Response:  At the time of site development, the project will comply with applicable Land  Development Codes for native tree replanting. Tree counts as of January 07, 2019 indicate a  total of fourteen (14) slash pines and nine (9) cabbage palms are to be replanted. Replanting  locations will be finalized at the SDP stage, but the intent is to cluster the replanted trees in the  NE corner of the site or distribute them as enhancements to the perimeter landscape buffers.  Notes have been added to the conditional use site plan.   2. The Master Concept plan indicates the location of native vegetation preservation/replanting area.  please remove the word potential. Will trees existing at this location be retained or are trees  proposed to be planted or a combination of both? Please clarify provide an exhibit.    Response:  See the response to #1 above. It is not anticipated that preservation will be practical,  so replanting is proposed.     Mr. Tim Finn, AICP   April 24, 2019  Page 2  3. Please clarify that the tree/preserve area will meet the setback requirements of (LDC 3.05.07 A 2  and or 3.05.07 H.3) If this setback will not be met, a deviation request with a justification  explanation will need to be provided for staff to review.     Response:  Per the April 5, 2019 meeting, Collier County has withdrawn this comment.  4. In the environmental data page 10 of 14 the protected species survey refers to a different project  please revise.    Response:  Page 10 of 14 is updated to reflect the correct project name.         LANDSCAPE REVIEW     1. 4.06.02 D. Water management systems, which must include retention and detention areas,  swales, and subsurface installations, are permitted within a required buffer provided they are  consistent with accepted engineering and landscaping practices and meet the criteria identified  in 4.06.02 D. ‐ Buffers are labeled appropriately. However, the water management area appears  to be encroaching into the South buffer more than 70% of the width and 50% of the area.    Response:  The Conditional Use site plan has been updated to reduce the encroachment to 50%  or less.    2. 4.06.03 B.  All Vehicular Use Areas must meet the standards. ‐ A landscape island is required  between the general parking and the loading spaces in front of the South building.     Response:  The Conditional Use site plan is updated to include a landscape island between the  general parking and loading spaces in front of the south building.    3. 4.06.03 B.  All Vehicular Use Areas must meet the standards. ‐ The landscape island between the  handicapped space and the loading spaces at the rear of the north building are shown less than  the minimum 8' wide.     Response:  The landscape island between the handicapped space and the loading spaces at the  rear of the north building are now shown to meet the minimum 8' wide requirement.      PUBLIC UTILITIES REVIEW     1. 3/25/2019: Per Table I of F.A.C. 64E‐6.008, average daily wastewater flow for day type schools is  estimated as 10 gpd per student, plus 15 gpd per worker, plus 4 gpd per student if showers are  provided, plus 4 gpd per student if a cafeteria is provided. Estimate average daily water demand  as 1.4 (ERC ratio of 350:250) times the average daily wastewater flow. Estimate the peak daily  water demand using a peaking factor of 1.35 per our 2014 Master Plan. Estimate peak daily  wastewater flow likewise. Revise the Statement of Utility Provisions accordingly and state all  assumptions.      Mr. Tim Finn, AICP   April 24, 2019  Page 3  Response:   The application has been revised to calculate flows based on the anticipated number  of students and faculty onsite at any given time.  An additional document is also provided which  includes flows calculated at a higher requirement based on square footage of office use.    2. 3/25/2019: A letter from the City of Naples Utilities Department dated January 24, 2019, which  was attached to the Statement of Utility Provisions, states that the subject property is within the  City of Naples potable water service area, but both parcels are in the Glades interlocal exception  area (see settlement agreement recorded at OR 1191, pages 668 to 741, as amended). The project  will receive potable water and wastewater services from the Collier County Water‐Sewer District.    Response:  Acknowledged, per correspondence between Eric Fey and the City of Naples the  project will receive potable and wastewater service from Collier County Public Utilities.      TRANSPORTATION PLANNING REVIEW     1. Additional Items that need to be addressed for Transportation Operations Review:  Rev.1: Reference TIS pg. 8, table 6.1, please revise segment 72.0.  Segment should read from  Charlemagne to US 41 instead of Davis to 41.    Response:  Table 6.1 and 6.2 have been revised accordingly.    2. Additional Items that need to be addressed for Transportation Operations Review:  Rev.1: Reference TIS pg. 19, table 7.1. Appears site generated trips is not correct‐consistent with  pg. 6, table 4.3 which indicated total of 247 two‐way PM Peak trips. Revise this table including  other calculations as needed.    Response:  The 125 trips listed in Table 7‐1 represent the Peak Hour Peak Direction project trips  heading NB on U.S. 41 only.  Additionally, the column descriptions have been updated to  provide additional clarification of intent for Table 7‐1.  3. Additional Items that need to be addressed for Transportation Operations Review:  Rev.1: Reference TIS pg. 21, section 9.0 Conclusion.  Please revise 1. To indicate total two‐way PM  trips consistent with table 4.3 on page 6 of the TIS. Revise other calculations‐trip counts as needed  in the TIS.    Response:  The TIS has been revised accordingly.    4. Rev.1: Additional new comments might possibly occur once the above are revised‐addressed.    Response:  Acknowledged.      ZONING REVIEW     1. Conditional Use Site Plan: Per LDC Section 4.05.04(G) Table 17 Parking Space Requirements, the  parking ratio for college/university is, "2 per 5 commuter students plus 1 per 2 resident students    Mr. Tim Finn, AICP   April 24, 2019  Page 4  plus 4 per 5 faculty/staff members." However, on the conditional use site plan the parking ratio  is "1 per 300 square feet." Why are you using the "1 per 300 sf ratio" when the LDC requires the  "2 per 5 commuter students plus 1 per 2 resident students plus 4 per 5 faculty/staff members"  college/university ratio. Because this is an LDC requirement you need to use the college/university  ratio to accurately calculate the required parking. As such, you will need to provide the total  number of commuter students, total number of resident students, and total number of  faculty/staff members. Revise the conditional use site plan and the parking summary table to  reflect the college/university parking ratio.     Response:  The parking calculations have been revised. As discussed in the April 5th meeting,  the ultimate number of student enrollment is unknown at this time, however, it is anticipated  that the maximum number of students onsite at any given time in the main 40,000 square foot  building is 170 along with 65 faculty and staff. The second, 25,000 square foot building will be  a future phase and may be for an approved C‐3 zoning use. If it is utilized as a second Keiser  University building it is anticipated that it could serve 105 additional students. However, to be  conservative, we will utilize the more stringent parking requirement of office space for that  building.     2. Conditional Use Site Plan: The 25,000 sf building proposes educational services or C‐3 uses.  Provide the exact uses that are being proposed within this building as we need to accurately  calculate the parking spaces based on these uses. For example, if it’s only retail in this building  then there will be a higher parking demand than that of a university which will need to be revised  and reflected in the conditional use site plan and the parking summary table.     Response:  See response to #1 above. The revised parking calculations reflect the educational  ratio for the main building and the higher requirement of office for the future 25,000 square  foot future building.  3. TIS Keiser University: Scenario 2 on page 6 illustrates the more intense land use combination  (educational uses and commercial uses); which will need to be utilized when calculating and  revising the required parking for the entire site on the conditional use site plan and the parking  summary table as this is the higher parking demand.      Response:  Per the April 5, 2019 meeting, Collier County has withdrawn this comment.  4. Conditional Use Site Plan: This plan illustrates a "potential future interconnect" at the north, west,  and south corners of the site. Why are you showing the interconnects? What is the intent of the  interconnects? Will these be provided or not?    Response:  Potential future interconnects are shown should this property owner and the  adjacent owners wish to interconnect the sites. These are not required, and they are shown as  potential so the Conditional Use master plan will not require a revision in the future should one  or more of those interconnects be desired, as advised by Transportation Planning staff.    Mr. Tim Finn, AICP   April 24, 2019  Page 5  5. Conditional Use Site Plan: Illustrate the proposed lighting, including type, dimensions, and  character.     Response:  At the time of site development, project will comply with applicable Land  Development Codes for site lighting. A note has been added to the Conditional Use Site Plan.  6. Property Ownership Disclosure Form: Under Section b, please include the percent of ownership.  Under Section e, please include the percent of ownership and the date of contract.     Response:  The Property Ownership Disclosure Form now includes the percent of ownership.  Under Section b and e, and the date of contract.       COUNTY ATTORNEY REVIEW     1. This conditional use is defined as "education services (8221 and 8222) in the LDC for the C‐3  district. However, the ZVL you provided from 11/15/18 indicates this use is classified under 8221  specifically. Please confirm that your proposed conditional use will be limited to SIC Code 8221,  and will NOT include 8222. You may need to discuss this with zoning staff.     Response:  Per the April 5, 2019 meeting, Collier County MAY withdraw this comment, however,  the applicant would like to have the conditional use include SIC Code 8222 and not be limited  to SIC Code 8221.  2. The Property Ownership Disclosure form lists the current owner and the contract purchaser.  However, it doesn't list any individuals that may have an interest in either company. Are there  any individuals or entities that are shareholders or otherwise have an equitable interest in the  property owner company or the contract purchaser company?    Response:  The Property Ownership Disclosure Form now includes the percent of ownership.  Under Section b and e, and the date of contract.  3. What is the minimum preserve requirement for this site? Your site plan will need to contain a  note that clearly identifies what the minimum preserve acreage/requirement is, and specifically  show where it will be located (i.e‐‐"Area of POTENTIAL native vegetation preservation/replanting"  is not sufficient. The location can't be "potential," it has to be definitive. If staff disagrees, please  feel free to explain.     Response:  Minimum preserve requirements will be based on tree count since there is no native  understory or groundcover present. At the time of site development, the project will comply  with applicable Land Development Codes for native tree replanting. Tree counts as of January  07, 2019 indicate a total of fourteen (14) slash pines and nine (9) cabbage palms are to be  replanted. Replanting locations will be finalized at the SDP stage, but the intent is to cluster the  replanted trees in the NE corner of the site or distribute them as enhancements to the perimeter  landscape buffers.    Mr. Tim Finn, AICP   April 24, 2019  Page 6  4. Your site plan identifies the dry detention area as 0.90 acres. However, it appears that you also  labeled a portion of the dry detention area as "potential native vegetation preservation/  replanting." Please have staff confirm that you can have preserve area within a dry  detention/drainage area. In other words, please have staff confirm that the dry  detention/drainage wouldn't be inconsistent with a preserve.     Response:  This is confirmed per LDC Section 3.05.07.A.2 which states that open space areas not  normally planted with trees, such as stormwater retention areas or lake banks not planted to  meet the LSPA requirement, may be used to satisfy this requirement.  5. What is the maximum number of students?     Response:  As discussed in the April 5th meeting, the ultimate number of students is unknown  at this time, however, it is anticipated that the maximum number of students onsite at any  given time in the main 40,000 square foot building is 170 along with 65 faculty and staff. The  second, 25,000 square foot building will be a future phase and if it is utilized as a second Keiser  University building it is anticipated that it could serve 105 additional students.       Thank you for your assistance in reviewing this petition. I hope that this letter and the attached  information has adequately addressed staffs’ comments and the conditional use application can now be  considered sufficient and ready to be scheduled for public hearing.  If you have any questions, please  contact me at 239‐461‐2415 or gmuller@johnsoneng.com.                                                                                     Sincerely,         JOHNSON ENGINEERING, INC.                  Gary Muller, AICP       Principal Planner                Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134  239-947-1144  engineering@gradyminor.com  www.gradyminor.com Hamilton Place RPUD PL20190000097 Application and Supporting Documents June 27, 2019 HEX Hearing Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. Ph. 239-947-1144 Fax. 239-947-0375 3800 Via Del Rey EB 0005151 LB 0005151 LC 26000266 Bonita Springs, FL 34134 www.gradyminor.com March 22, 2019 Mr. Gilbert Martinez Zoning Services, Planning & Zoning Department Collier County Growth Management Division 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 RE: Hamilton Place RPUD Insubstantial Change (PDI) – PL20190000097, Submittal 1 Dear Mr. Martinez: On behalf of our client, Toll Bros, Inc., we are submitting an application for an Insubstantial Change to a PUD (PDI) for the above referenced project. The proposed insubstantial change to the Hamilton Place RPUD is being requested in order to add standards for townhouse type dwelling units. The existing PUD permits multi-family dwelling units and attached single family dwelling units, but did not includ e development standards that would allow traditional townhouses to be constructed. Exhibit B has been revised to include development standards appropriate for townhouse style dwelling units. A deviation has been requested to provide for project signage to be located closer than 10 feet to the property line due to the County’s request for compensatory right-of-way for the Livingston Road deceleration lane. No increases in intensity are proposed and with the exception of the deviation notation, no other changes are proposed to the Master Plan. Documents filed with submittal 1 include the following: 1. Cover Letter 2. Completed Application 3. Property Owner List 4. Pre-Application Meeting notes 5. Project Narrative and Detail of Request 6. Proposed Exhibits A-F 7. Ordinance 2017-02 8. Warranty Deeds 9. Affidavit of Authorization 10. Covenant of Unified Control 11. Addressing Checklist Mr. Gilbert Martinez RE: Hamilton Place RPUD – PL20190000097, Submittal 1 March 22, 2019 Page 2 of 2 12. Property Owner Disclosure 13. Aerial Location Map Please contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, D. Wayne Arnold, AICP Enclosures Cc: Jim Hepler, Toll Brothers, Inc. GradyMinor File COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Revised 3/27/2018 Page 1 of 4 INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO A PUD (PDI) LDC subsection 10.02.13 E & Code of Laws section 2-83 – 2-90 Ch. 3 G.3 of the Administrative Code Pursuant to LDC subsection 10.02.13 E.2, a PUD insubstantial change includes any change that is not considered a substantial or a minor change. A PUD insubstantial change to an approved PUD ordinance shall be based upon an evaluation of LDC subsection 10.02.13 E.1 and shall require the review and approval of the Hearing Examiner. The Hearing Examiner’s approval shall be based on the findings and criteria used for the original application . PETITION NO PROJECT NAME DATE PROCESSED APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Name of Property Owner(s): ______________________________________________________ Name of Applicant if different than owner: __________________________________________ Address: __________________________City: _____________ State: _______ ZIP: __________ Telephone: ____________________ Cell: ____________________ Fax: ___________________ E-Mail Address: ________________________________________________________________ Name of Agent: ________________________________________________________________ Firm: _________________________________________________________________________ Address: ______________________City: _______________ State: _________ ZIP: __________ Telephone: _____________________ Cell: _____________________ Fax: _________________ E-Mail Address: ________________________________________________________________ DETAIL OF REQUEST On a separate sheet, attached to the application, describe the insubstantial change request. Identify how the request does not meet the PUD substantial change criteria established in LDC subsection 10.02.13 E.1. To be completed by staff COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Revised 3/27/2018 Page 2 of 4 PROPERTY INFORMATION PUD NAME: _______________________ ORDINANCE NUMBER: ________________________ FOLIO NUMBER(S): _____________________________________________________________ Provide a legal (if PUD is recorded) or graphic description of area of amendment (this may be graphically illustrated on Amended PUD Master Plan). If applying for a portion of the PUD, provide a legal description for subject portion. Attach on a separate sheet, a written description of the map or text change. Does amendment comply with the Growth Management Plan? Yes No If no, please explain: _______________________________________________________ Has a public hearing been held on this property within the last year? Yes No If yes, in whose name? _____________________________________________________ Has any portion of the PUD been SOLD and/or DEVELOPED? Are any changes proposed for the area sold and/or developed? Yes No If yes, please describe on an attached separate sheet. COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Revised 3/27/2018 Page 3 of 4 Pre-Application Meeting and Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: PUD Insubstantial Change Chapter 3 G.3 of the Administrative Code The following Submittal Requirement checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting and at time of application submittal. At final submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with the application packet. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. REQUIREMENTS FOR REVIEW # OF COPIES REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Completed Application (download current form from County website) 1 Pre-Application Meeting notes 1 Project Narrative, including a detailed description of proposed changes and why amendment is necessary 1 Detail of request 1 Current Master Plan & 1 Reduced Copy 1 Revised Master Plan & 1 Reduced Copy 1 Revised Text and any exhibits PUD document with changes crossed through & underlined PUD document as revised with amended Title Page with Ordinance # Warranty Deed Legal Description 1 Boundary survey, if boundary of original PUD is amended If PUD is platted, include plat book pages List identifying Owner & all parties of corporation 1 Affidavit of Authorization, signed & notarized 1 Completed Addressing Checklist 1 Property Ownership Disclosure Form 1 Copy of 8 ½ in. x 11 in. graphic location map of site 1 Electronic copy of all documents and plans *Please advise: The Office of the Hearing Examiner requires all materials to be submitted electronically in PDF format. *If located in Immokalee or seeking affordable housing, include an additional set of each submittal requirement. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS: • Following the completion of the review process by County Review staff, the applicant shall submit all materials electronically to the designated project manager. • Please contact the project manager to confirm the number of additional copies required. COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Revised 3/27/2018 Page 4 of 4 PLANNERS – INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: School District (Residential Components): Amy Lockheart Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment: Executive Director Utilities Engineering: Eric Fey Parks and Recreation: Barry Williams and David Berra Emergency Management: Dan Summers Naples Airport Authority: Conservancy of SWFL: Nichole Johnson Other: City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director Other: FEE REQUIREMENTS  PUD Amendment Insubstantial (PDI): $1,500.00  Pre-Application Meeting: $500.00  Estimated Legal Advertising fee for the Office of the Hearing Examiner: $1,125.00 Same fee applies if the petition is referred to the Collier County Planning Commission, where the CCPC serves as the deciding authority instead of the HEX. Fire Code Plans Review Fees are collected at the time of application submission and those fees are set forth by the Authority having jurisdiction. The Land Development Code requires Neighborhood Notification mailers for Applications headed to hearing, and this fee is collected prior to hearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. All checks payable to: Board of County Commissioners. The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Department Planning and Regulation ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 ____________________________________________ ____________ Agent/Owner Signature Date ____________________________________________ Applicant/Owner Name (please print) Hamilton Place RPUD (PDI) (PL20190000097) Property Owner List January 30, 2019 Page 1 of 1 TBHP Property Owner List.docx Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134  239-947-1144  engineering@gradyminor.com  www.gradyminor.com Name of Property Owner(s): Parcel No. 00287840009 and 00287880001, Maria Leonor Santos Parcel No. 00287920000, Edmund H & Betty Poore Parcel No. 00287600003, Elfrieda H Sutherland Trust Hamilton Place RPUD (PL20190000097) Detail of Request February 14, 2019 Page 1 of 3 TBHP Detail of Request - Insubstantial Changes.docx Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134  239-947-1144  engineering@gradyminor.com  www.gradyminor.com Project Narrative The Hamilton Place RPUD was approved in 2017 as Ordinance 2017-02. The PUD is approved for 66 residential dwelling units, which include multi -family, single family detached, single family attached and single-family variable lot line. The applicant is proposing to add development standards for townhomes the table in Exhibit B. The existing PUD did not include development standards that permit construction of townhome type dwellings consistent with Toll Brothers product. The Master Plan remains unchanged from the 2017 approval. One deviation to allow a project sign closer to Livingston Road has been requested for the project. Detail of Request On a separate sheet, attached to the application, describe the insubstantial change request. Identify how the request does not meet the PUD substantial change criteria established in LDC subsection 10.02.13 E.1. Insubstantial Change Criteria LDC Subsection 10.02.13 E.1 E. Changes and amendments. There are three types of changes to a PUD Ordinance: Substantial, Insubstantial, and Minor. 1. Substantial changes. Any substantial change(s) to an approved PUD Ordinance shall require the review and recommendation of the Planning Commission and approval by the Board of County Commissioners as a PUD amendment prior to implementation. Applicants shall be required to submit and process a new application complete with pertinent supporting data, as set forth in the Administrative Code. For the purpose of this section, a substantial change shall be deemed to exist where: a A proposed change in the boundary of the PUD; No change in the PUD boundary is proposed. b. A proposed increase in the total number of dwelling units or intensity of land use or height of buildings within the development; No increase in the number, intensity, or heights of buildings are proposed. Hamilton Place RPUD (PL20190000097) Detail of Request February 14, 2019 Page 2 of 3 TBHP Detail of Request - Insubstantial Changes.docx Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134  239-947-1144  engineering@gradyminor.com  www.gradyminor.com c. A proposed decrease in preservation, conservation, recreation or open space areas within the development not to exceed 5 percent of the total acreage previously designated as such, or 5 acres in area; No net change in preserve, recreation or open space results from this amendment. d. A proposed increase in the size of areas used for nonresidential uses, to include institutional, commercial and industrial land uses (excluding preservation, conservation or open spaces), or a proposed relocation of nonresidential land uses; No increase in non-residential uses or areas for non-residential uses are proposed. e. A substantial increase in the impacts of the development which may include, but are not limited to, increases in traffic generation; changes in traffic circulation; or impacts on other public facilities; No additional traffic or public facility impacts will result from the request regarding the proposed revisions. f. A change that will result in land use activities that generate a higher level of vehicular traffic based upon the Trip Generation Manual published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers; No additional dwelling units are proposed; therefore, there are no additional traffic impacts. g. A change that will result in a requirement for increased stormwater retention, or will otherwise increase stormwater discharges; Adequate area exists on-site for stormwater retention, and no change to the approved discharge rate is proposed. No additional stormwater retention areas will be required. Hamilton Place RPUD (PL20190000097) Detail of Request February 14, 2019 Page 3 of 3 TBHP Detail of Request - Insubstantial Changes.docx Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134  239-947-1144  engineering@gradyminor.com  www.gradyminor.com h. A change that will bring about a relationship to an abutting land use that would be incompatible with an adjacent land use; The change will not be incompatible as the area supporting residential development remains unchanged from the 2017 approval. i. Any modification to the PUD master plan or PUD document or amendment to a PUD ordinance which is inconsistent with the Future Land Use Element or other element of the Growth Management Plan or which modification would increase the density or intensity of the permitted land uses; The PUD and proposed changes are consistent with the Collier County Growth Management Plan. j. The proposed change is to a PUD district designated as a development of regional impact (DRI) and approved pursuant to F.S. § 380.06, where such change requires a determination and public hearing by Collier County pursuant to F.S. § 380.06(19). Any change that meets the criterion of F.S. § 380.06(19)(e)2, and any changes to a DRI/PUD master plan that clearly do not create a substantial deviation shall be reviewed and approved by Collier County under this LDC section 10.02.13; or This project is not a DRI. k. Any modification in the PUD master plan or PUD document or amendment to a PUD ordinance which impact(s) any consideration deemed to be a substantial modification as described under this LDC section 10.02.13. The proposed changes do not meet the standards for a substantial modification and create no external impacts. The addition of development standards for a townhome product are consistent with insubstantial change criteria in the LDC. Hamilton Place RPUD (PDI-PL20190000097) Proposed PUD Revisions Words underlined are additions; words struck through are deletions June 6, 2019 Page 1 of 3 Proposed PUD Revisions 2019-rev1.docx Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134  239-947-1144  engineering@gradyminor.com  www.gradyminor.com EXHIBIT B FOR HAMILTON PLACE RPUD DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Exhibit B sets forth the development standards for land uses within the Hamilton Place RPUD Subdistrict . Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or subdivision plat. STANDARDS SINGLE- FAMILY DETACHED VARIABLE LOT LINE FOR SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED MULTI- FAMILY TOWNHOUSE AMENITY CENTER Minimum Lot Area 5,000 SF 4,000 SF 3,500 SF 1 acre 1,600 SF 103,000 SF Minimum Lot Width *3 50 feet 40 feet 35 feet 100 feet 20 feet N/A Minimum Lot Depth 100 feet 100 feet 100 feet 100 feet 80 feet N/A Minimum Front Yard *1,*6 20 feet *2 20 feet *2 20 feet *2 20 feet 20 feet *2 N/A Minimum Side Yard 5 feet 0 - 10 feet *4 0 or 5 feet 10 feet 0 feet attached 5 feet detached N/A Minimum Rear Yard *6 Principal 15 feet 15 feet 15 feet 15 feet 0 feet from LBT or LMT N/A Maximum Height Zoned (not to exceed 2 stories) Actual (not to exceed 2 stories) 30 feet 35 feet 30 feet 35 feet 30 feet 35 feet 30 feet 35 feet 30 feet 35 feet 30 feet 35 feet Minimum Distance Between Principal Structures *5 12 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet N/A Floor Area Min. (S.F.) 1500 SF 1000 SF 1000 SF 1000 SF 1000 SF N/A PUD Boundary 40 feet 40 feet 40 feet 40 feet 40 feet 40 feet Preserve 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet Hamilton Place RPUD (PDI-PL20190000097) Proposed PUD Revisions Words underlined are additions; words struck through are deletions June 6, 2019 Page 2 of 3 Proposed PUD Revisions 2019-rev1.docx Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134  239-947-1144  engineering@gradyminor.com  www.gradyminor.com ACCESSORY STRUCTURES Front *2 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet Side 5 feet 0 feet 0 feet 10 feet 0 feet 10 feet Minimum Rear Yard *6 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet N/A PUD Boundary 40 feet 40 feet 40 feet 40 feet 40 feet 40 feet Preserve 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet Minimum Distance Between Structures 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet Maximum Height Zoned (not to exceed 2 stories) Actual (not to exceed 2 stories) 25 feet 30 feet 25 feet 30 feet 25 feet 30 feet 25 feet 30 feet 25 feet 30 feet 25 feet 30 feet *** *** *** *** *** Text break *** *** *** *** *** LBT – Landscape Buffer Tract LMT – Lake Maintenance Tract EXHIBIT F Hamilton Place RPUD (PDI-PL20190000097) Proposed PUD Revisions Words underlined are additions; words struck through are deletions June 6, 2019 Page 3 of 3 Proposed PUD Revisions 2019-rev1.docx Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134  239-947-1144  engineering@gradyminor.com  www.gradyminor.com FOR HAMILTON PLACE RPUD LIST OF DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS 1. PUD MONITORING One entity (hereinafter the Managing Entity) shall be responsible for PUD monitoring until close-out of the PUD, and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUD commitments until close-out of the PUD. At the time of this PUD approval, the Managing Entity is WCI Communities, LLCToll Bros., Inc., 24301 24201 Walden Center Drive, Ste. 204, Bonita Springs, FL 34135. Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity, then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document that needs to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. After such approval, the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts, the Managing Entity shall provide written notice to County that includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required by the PUD by the new owner and the new owner’s agreement to comply with the Commitments through the Managing Entity, but the Managing Entity shall not be relieved of its responsibility under this Section. When the PUD is closed-out, then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment of PUD commitments. ORDINANCE NO. 17-0 2 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 2004-41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH ESTABLISHED THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM A RURAL AGRICULTURAL (A) ZONING DISTRICT TO A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (RPUD) ZONING DISTRICT FOR THE PROJECT KNOWN AS HAMILTON PLACE RPUD TO ALLOW DEVELOPMENT OF UP TO 66 SINGLE-FAMILY AND/OR MULTI-FAMILY DWELLING UNITS ON PROPERTY LOCATED EAST OF LIVINGSTON ROAD AND SOUTH OF PINE RIDGE ROAD IN SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 9.75+/- ACRES; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. IPUDZ-PL201600012551 WHEREAS, D. Wayne Arnold, AICP of Q. Grady Minor & Associates, Inc. representing developer, WCI Communities, Inc., petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the zoning classification of the herein described property. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA that: SECTION ONE: The zoning classification of the herein described real property located in Section 18, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida is changed from a Rural Agricultural A) zoning district to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) zoning district for a 9.75+/- acre project to be known as the Hamilton Place RPUD to allow up to 66 single family and/or multi-family dwelling units in accordance with the RPUD Documents, attached hereto as Exhibits "A" through "F" and incorporated herein by reference. The appropriate zoning atlas map or maps as described in Ordinance No. 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, is/are hereby amended accordingly. 16-CPS-01571] 79 Hamilton Place RPUD PUDZ-PL20160001255 12/19/16 1 of 2 SECTION TWO: This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by super-majority vote of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this II7 day of ,J c.r LA t e 2017. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By:y By:11 Deputy Clerk. 416PENNY A444 Chairman Attest as to Chairman's A signature mit. Approved as to form and legality: r 1',`'0\' a He'di Ashton-Cicko Managing Assistant County Attorney Attachments: Exhibit A—Permitted Uses Exhibit B —Development Standards Exhibit C—Master Plan Exhibit D—Legal Description Exhibit E—List of Deviations Exhibit F—Developer Commitments This ordinance filed with the Sec tory oftote's Office the doy of 4ahV' WC) 2d 1 Z and acknowtedgeme7 t of that filing received this , day of 0-At t 2o1-1 By '/1 "weard i 16-CPS-01571] 79 Hamilton Place RPUD PUDZ-PL20160001255 12/19/16 2 of 2 EXHIBIT A FOR HAMILTON PLACE RPUD Regulations for development of the Hamilton Place RPUD shall be in accordance with the contents of this RPUD Document and applicable sections of the LDC and Growth Management Plan (GMP) in effect at the time of issuance of any development order to which said regulations relate. Where this RPUD Ordinance does not provide development standards, then the provisions of the specific sections of the LDC that are otherwise applicable shall apply. PERMITTED USES: A maximum of 66 residential dwelling units shall be permitted within the RPUD. No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: RESIDENTIAL A.Principal Uses: 1. Dwelling Units — Multi-family, single family detached, single family attached and single family variable lot line. 2. Any other principal use, which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals ("BZA") or the Hearing Examiner. B. Accessory Uses: 1.Customary accessory uses associated with the principal uses permitted in this RPUD, including but not limited to garages, carports, swimming pools, spas, screen enclosures and utility buildings. 2.Model homes and model home centers including sales trailers and offices for project administration, construction, sales and marketing. 3.Open space uses and structures such as, but not limited to, boardwalks, nature trails, gazebos and picnic areas. 4.Any other accessory use, which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses and consistent with the permitted accessory uses of this PUD as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals or the Hearing Examiner. AMENITY AREA A.Principal Uses: Hamilton Place RPUD,PL20160001255 Page 1 of 8 12/15/2016 71%r' 1.Clubhouses with cafes, snack bars and similar uses intended to serve residents and guests. 2.Community administrative and recreation facilities. Outdoor recreation facilities, such as a community swimming pool, tennis/pickle ball courts and basketball courts, parks, playgrounds, pedestrian/bikeways, and passive and/or active water features (private intended for use by the residents and their guests only). 3.Open space uses and structures such as, but not limited to, boardwalks, nature trails, bikeways, landscape nurseries, gazebos, boat and canoe docks, fishing piers, picnic areas, fitness trails and shelters to serve residents and their guests. 4.Tennis clubs, health spas, fitness facilities and other indoor recreational uses private, intended for use by the residents and their guests only). B.Accessory Uses: 1.Model homes and model home centers including sales trailers and offices for project administration, construction, sales and marketing. 2.Any other accessory use, which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses and consistent with the permitted accessory uses of this PUD as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals or Hearing Examiner. PRESERVE A. Allowable Uses: 1.Nature trails and boardwalks that do not reduce the amount of required preserve area to be retained. 2.Mitigation for environmental permitting. 3.Passive Recreation areas, as per LDC requirements. 4.Water management as allowed by the LDC. Hamilton Place RPUD, PL20160001255 Page 2 of 8 12/ 15/2016 EXHIBIT B FOR HAMILTON PLACE RPUD DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Exhibit B sets forth the development standards for land uses within the Hamilton Place RPUD Subdistrict. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or subdivision plat. STANDARDS SINGLE-FAMILY VARIABLE LOT SINGLE FAMILY MULTI- FAMILY AMENITY DETACHED LINE FOR SINGLE ATTACHED CENTER FAMILY Minimum Lot Area 5,000 SF 4,000 SF 3,500 SF 1 acre 10,000 SF Minimum Lot Width *3 50 feet 40 feet 35 feet 100 feet N/A Minimum Lot Depth 100 feet 100 feet 100 feet 100 feet N/A Minimum Front Yard *1,*6 20 feet*2 20 feet*2 20 feet*2 20 feet N/A Minimum Side Yard 5 feet 0-10 feet*4 0 or 5 feet 10 feet N/A Minimum Rear Yard *6 Principal 15 feet 15 feet 15 feet 15 feet N/A Maximum Height Zoned (not to exceed 2 stories) 30 feet 30 feet 30 feet 30 feet 30 feet Actual (not to exceed 2 stories) 35 feet 35 feet 35 feet 35 feet 35 feet Minimum Distance Between 12 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet N/A Principal Structures *5 Floor Area Min. (S.F.) 1500 SF 1000 SF 1000 SF 1000 SF N/A PUD Boundary 40 feet 40 feet 40 feet 40 feet 40 feet Preserve 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet 7 y -.- .. m— a ACCESSORY STRUCTURES Front *2 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet Side 5 feet 0 feet 0 feet 10 feet 10 feet Minimum Rear Yard *6 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet N/A PUD Boundary 40 feet 40 feet 40 feet 40 feet 40 feet Preserve 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet Minimum Distance Between 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet Structures Maximum Height Zoned (not to exceed 2 stories) 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet Actual (not to exceed 2 stories) 30 feet 30 feet 30 feet 30 feet 30 feet Minimum lot areas for any unit type may be exceeded. The unit type,and not the minimum lot area, shall define the development standards to be applied by the Growth Management Department during an application for a building permit. For variable lot single family and single family attached units, a conceptual exhibit showing typical building configurations, including building setbacks and building separations, shall be submitted to the Growth Management Division with the application for the first building permit for the platted development tract. Verification of ingress/egress for maintenance shall be provided for variable lot line single-family units. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. 1—Front yards shall be measured as follows: A.If the parcel is served by a public right-of-way,setback is measured from the adjacent right-of-way line. B.If the parcel is served by a private road, setback is measured from the back of curb(if curbed)or edge of pavement(if not curbed). i Hamilton Place RPUD,PL20160001255 Page 3 of 8 12/15/2016 C.If the parcel has frontage on two sides, setback is measured from the side with the shortest frontage with the other frontage designated as a side yard. 2—Front entry garages must be a minimum of 20', and a minimum of 23'from a sidewalk. Porches, entry features and roofed courtyards may be reduced to 15'. 3—Minimum lot width may be reduced by 20%for cul- de-sac lots provided the minimum lot area requirement is maintained. 4—The side setback may be variable between zero feet(0')to ten feet(10')as long as a 10-foot minimum separation between principal structures is maintained. If the variable lot line for single-family option is utilized,the owner shall provide with the building permit application, the setback of the principal structures on the abutting lots of all sides. 5—Building distance may be reduced at garages to a minimum of 0'where attached garages are provided and a 10' minimum building separation is maintained,if detached. 6—No front building setback is required from the 30' wide access easement, which extends along the southerly boundary of the Hamilton Place PUD. However,a landscape buffer shall be required. Note:nothing in this RPUD Document shall be deemed to approve a deviation from the LDC unless it is expressly stated in a list of deviations. Hamilton Place RPUD,PL20160001255 Page 4 of 8 12/15/2016 ZcNOHmw(n w-i-I COoCoOSm0• C2> nn 0 a z> LIVINGSTON ROADm-DiK-0<inZ -1ZZPI X O01Z0OCu i0Kmryico- 0223 -0Ez1 3.-Tilriy. 1nm-I I I iv 7gpmKCotIOWwmmTVO?Zmg1C0 m m `DfiltrJ_I I1,am 0F I 0m mmOmINp XpNci SA W ` CO Ig omm 71 0Qommr "i rD O A Z DmmI0O v0. I 2 m n ,g 0 I * D %, 0 1 IpMvzaAK I m I I N 0 O C x oNmmsI m H I m Z 70 ISI sPi• iT s co m E#910N 1W 333S) I O o m 01ms< m 3 OOEz— i 1 > N D D I CmOIrr s - © z m m m m ti ccn I k I z I m mD I Dco. Rl d O C mz M I I Z0 a = cn0 j I 1 -o b O 00 v, o I D zz I coI00IynO m —m{ m I z , o G I (n w mm I m co s 0 WD I I m E rD I m m m r . = III c, z 7> = = cn cn I m C„ 8 - _ oma a m m I 1 C CImmXmmDME X x I D K mz m D z I / // // //(/i///E Dmz°ODm 3co> uDmy 2 2 l J J J J I-X CX CCmcn DI EE 0 Q m< K K m(nDim (n D EEEEEEEEE m00 m mZOm m 0o Zm mjZ7I I 37bmm. < E f E E E E E E E 00 cn r iv co r0-1DmDD E Ek E E E v v 0 cnZ 17r E EE n d E f I co H µ m D TO D D C Z m D I E E E E E E E E E C 1 7J<A Z E E E E E E E f E E 0 n 0 Q) 0 Z I EEE f E E E D Nm Da m L — — — — — n< Io, o_m ZD corn ---,000cnco n - A0 Xm -4 +1+ -- f ft4> 0+ y z c 0C 00 C C n 3A 3S32id 3Sfl g I -z it O H0 and S3NV-I NO1ONI-NV 03NOZ 0m - 3 m g— EXHIBIT D FOR HAMILTON PLACE RPUD LEGAL DESCRIPTION PER COMMITMENT NUMBER: 1062-3504066) THE EAST 264.00 FEET OF THE WEST 528.00 FEET OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. PER COMMITMENT NUMBER: 1062-3504081) THE WEST 264 FEET AND THE EAST 264 FEET OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 18,TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. PER COMMITMENT NUMBER: 1062-3504087) THE EAST 264.00 FEET OF THE WEST 792.00 FEET OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. AND THE EAST 264.00 FEET OF THE WEST 1056.00 FEET OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/ 2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. Hamilton Place RPUD, PL20160001255 Page 6 of 8 12/15/2016 EXHIBIT E FOR HAMILTON PLACE RPUD LIST OF DEVIATIONS No Deviations requested. Hamilton Place RPUD, PL20160001255 Page 7 of 8 12/15/2016 AC1 EXHIBIT F FOR HAMILTON PLACE RPUD LIST OF DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS 1.PUD MONITORING One entity (hereinafter the Managing Entity) shall be responsible for PUD monitoring until close-out of the PUD, and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUD commitments until close-out of the PUD. At the time of this PUD approval, the Managing Entity is WCI Communities, LLC, 24301 Walden Center Drive, Bonita Springs, FL 34135. Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity, then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document that needs to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. After such approval, the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts, the Managing Entity shall provide written notice to County that includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required by the PUD by the new owner and the new owner's agreement to comply with the Commitments through the Managing Entity, but the Managing Entity shall not be relieved of its responsibility under this Section. When the PUD is closed-out, then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment of PUD commitments. 2.MISCELLANEOUS a. Issuance of a development permit by a county does not in any way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law. b. All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before commencement of the development 3.ENVIRONMENTAL a. The RPUD shall be required to preserve 15% of native vegetation, 6.46± acres of native vegetation exists on-site requiring a minimum preservation of 0.97± acres (6.46 x .15 = 0.97) of native vegetation to be retained. b. Preserves may be used to satisfy the landscape buffer requirements after exotic removal in accordance with LDC Section 4.06.02 and LDC Section 4.06.05.E.1. Supplemental plantings with native plant materials shall be in accordance with LDC Section 3.05.07. 4.WATER MANAGEMENT The project's stormwater management system shall be designed to discharge to the east into the Whippoorwill Flowway. Hamilton Place RPUD, PL20160001255 Page 8 of 8 12/15/2016 4- THE 1 iAO ii Itatt VLF t J FLORIDA DEPARTMENT Of STATE RICK SCOTT KEN DETZNER Governor Secretary of State January 30, 2017 Honorable Dwight E. Brock Clerk of the Circuit Court Collier County Post Office Box 413044 Naples, Florida 34101-3044 Attention: Martha Vergara, BMR Senior Clerk Dear Mr. Brock: Pursuant to the provisions of Section 125.66, Florida Statutes, this will acknowledge receipt of your electronic copy of Collier County Ordinance No. 17-02,which was filed in this office on January 30, 2017. Sincerely, Ernest L. Reddick Program Administrator ELR/lb R. A. Gray Building • 500 South Bronough Street • Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0250 Telephone: (850) 245-6270 www.dos.state.fl.us COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 ADDRESSING CHECKLIST Please complete the following and email to GMD_Addressing@colliergov.net or fax to the Operations Division at 239-252-5724 or submit in person to the Addressing Section at the above address. Form must be signed by Addressing personnel prior to pre-application meeting, please allow 3 days for processing. Not all items will apply to every project. Items in bold type are required. FOLIO NUMBERS MUST BE PROVIDED. Forms older than 6 months will require additional review and approval by the Addressing Section. PETITION TYPE (Indicate type below, complete a separate Addressing Checklist for each Petition type) BL (Blasting Permit) BD (Boat Dock Extension) Carnival/Circus Permit CU (Conditional Use) EXP (Excavation Permit) FP (Final Plat LLA (Lot Line Adjustment) PNC (Project Name Change) PPL (Plans & Plat Review) PSP (Preliminary Subdivision Plat) PUD Rezone RZ (Standard Rezone) SDP (Site Development Plan) SDPA (SDP Amendment) SDPI (Insubstantial Change to SDP) SIP (Site Im provement Plan) SIPI (Insubstantial Change to SIP) SNR (Street Name Change) SNC (Street Name Change – Unplatted) TDR (Transfer of Development Rights) VA (Variance) VRP (Vegetation Removal Permit) VRSFP (Vegetation Removal & Site Fill Permit) OTHER LEGAL DESCRIPT ION of subject property or properties (copy of lengthy description may be attached) FOLIO (Property ID) NUMBER(s) of above (attach to, or associate with, legal description if more than one) STREET ADDRESS or ADDRESSES (as applicable, if already assigned) PROPOSED STREET NAMES (if applicable) SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NUMBER (for existing projects/sites only) LOCATION MAP must be attached showing exact location of project/site in relation to nearest public road right- of-way PROPOSED PROJECT NAME (if applicable) SDP - or AR or PL # SURVEY (copy - needed only for unplatted properties) CURRENT PROJECT NAME (if applicable) Rev. 6/9/2017 Page 1 of 2 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 Please Return Approved Checklist By: Email Personally picked up Applicant Name: Signature on Addressing Checklist does not constitute Project and/or Street Name approval and is subject to further review by the Operations Division. FOR STAFF USE ONLY Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Approved by: Date: Updated by: Date: IF OLDER THAN 6 MONTHS, FORM MUST BE UPDATED OR NEW FORM SUBMITTED Fax Email/Fax:Phone: Project or development names proposed for, or already appearing in, condominium documents (if application; indicate whether proposed or existing) Rev. 6/9/2017 Page 2 of 2 EXHIBIT D FOR HAMILTON PLACE RPUD LEGAL DESCRIPTION PER COMMITMENT NUMBER: 1062-3504066) THE EAST 264.00 FEET OF THE WEST 528.00 FEET OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. PER COMMITMENT NUMBER: 1062-3504081) THE WEST 264 FEET AND THE EAST 264 FEET OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 18,TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. PER COMMITMENT NUMBER: 1062-3504087) THE EAST 264.00 FEET OF THE WEST 792.00 FEET OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. AND THE EAST 264.00 FEET OF THE WEST 1056.00 FEET OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/ 2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. Hamilton Place RPUD, PL20160001255 Page 6 of 8 12/15/2016 2004. Collier County Property Appraiser. While the Collier County Property Appraiser is committed to providing the most accurate and up-to-date information, no warranties expressed or implied are provided for the data herein, its use, or its interpretation. COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Created 9/28/2017 Page 1 of 4 This is a required form with all land use petitions, except for Appeals and Zoning Verification Letters. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. Please complete the following, use additional sheets if necessary. a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest: Name and Address % of Ownership Parcel No. 00287840009 and 00287880001 Maria Leonor Santos, 2136 Andrew Drive, Naples, FL 34112 100 Parcel No. 00287920000 Edmund H & Betty Poore, 7025 Nighthawk Drive, Naples, FL 34105-4831 100 b. If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each: Name and Address % of Ownership c. If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest: Name and Address % of Ownership Parcel No. 00287600003 Elfrieda H Sutherland Trust 100% C/O Gayle Ann Durrance, 2076 Sagebrush Circle, Naples, FL 34120-4568 Lynda Kay Turner 25% after honoring the Trust Gayle Ann Durrance 25% after honoring the Trust George Alex Sutherland, Jr. 25% after honoring the Trust PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DISCLOSURE FORM COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Created 9/28/2017 Page 2 of 4 Fred Richard Sutherland 25% after honoring the Trust d. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and/or limited partners: Name and Address % of Ownership e. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners: Name and Address % of Ownership Toll Bros., Inc., 24201 Walden Center Drive, Ste. 204 Bonita Springs, FL 34134 100 Robert Parahus, Regional President Gregory S. Netro, Group President Mark J. Warshauer, Senior Vice President Kenneth J. Greenspan, Vice President and Assistant Secretary Douglas C. Yearley, Jr., Director and CEO Richard T. Hartman, Director, President and COO Martin P. Connor, Director, Senior Vice President and CFO Michael I. Snyder, Senior Vice President and Secretary Donald Barnes, Senior Vice President Gregg Ziegler, Senior Vice President and Treasurer Steve Merten, Division President Brock Fanning, Division Senior Vice President Christian Adams, Assistant Secretary Frederick Pfister, Division Senior Vice President Kevin R. Brown, Division Senior Vice President Rodney L. Tucker, Division Vice President Date of Contract: COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Created 9/28/2017 Page 3 of 4 f. If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or officers, if a corporation, partnership, or trust: Name and Address N.A. g. Date subject property acquired 73', 87', 95', 2001 Leased: Term of lease years /months If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following: Date of option: Date option terminates: , or Anticipated closing date: Any petition required to have Property Ownership Disclosure, will not be accepted without this form. Requirements for petition types are located on the associated application form. Any change in ownership whether individually or with a Trustee, Company or other interest -holding party, must be disclosed to Collier County immediately if such change occurs prior to the petition’s final public hearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Department ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 AFFIRM PROPERTY OWNERSHIP INFORMATION COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Created 9/28/2017 Page 4 of 4 March 20, 2019 Agent/Owner Signature Date D. Wayne Arnold, AICP Agent/Owner Name (please print) LIVINGSTON RDPOSITANO CIR Brynwood WAY SERRANO CIRBrynwood Preserve LN VIOLINO LNNighthawk DR Eatonwood LN SERRANO CIR Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community Hamilton Place RPUD Location Map SUBJECT PROPERTY . 310 0 310155 Feet Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. Ph. 239-947-1144 Fax. 239-947-0375 3800 Via Del Rey EB 0005151 LB 0005151 LC 26000266 Bonita Springs, FL 34134 www.gradyminor.com May 14, 2019 RE: Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) Petition PL20190000097, Hamilton Place Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) Dear Sir or Madam: A Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) hosted by D. Wayne Arnold, AICP, of Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A., representing Toll Bros., Inc. (Applicants) will be held on: Tuesday, June 4, 2019, 5:30 pm at Naples Church of Christ, 12760 Livingston Rd, Naples, FL 34105 Toll Bros., Inc. has submitted a formal application to Collier County, seeking approval of an insubstantial change to a Planned Unit Development (PUD). The proposed insubstantial change to the Hamilton Place RPUD is being requested in order to add standards for townhouse type dwelling units. The existing RPUD permits multi-family dwelling units and attached single family dwelling units, but did not include development standards that would allow traditional townhouses to be constructed. Exhibit B has been revised to include development standards appropriate for townhouse style dwelling units. The Master Plan remains unchanged from the 2017 approval, Ordinance 2017-02. The subject property (Hamilton Place RPUD) is comprised of 9.75± acres and is located on east of Livingston Road and south of Pine Ridge Road in Section 18, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. The Neighborhood Information Meeting is for informational purposes only, it is not a public hearing. Project information is posted online at www.gradyminor.com/planning. If you have questions or comments, they can be directed by mail, phone, fax or e-mail to: sumpenhour@gradyminor.com, phone 239-947-1144, fax 239-947-0375, Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A., 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, Florida 34134. Sincerely, Sharon Umpenhour Senior Planning Technician RE: Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM), Petition PL20190000097, Hamilton Place Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) May 14, 2019 Page 2 of 2 Project Location Map: Hamilton Place RPUD (PDI-PL20190000097) Proposed PUD Revisions Words underlined are additions; words struck through are deletions April 29, 2019 Page 1 of 3 Proposed PUD Revisions 2019.docx Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134  239-947-1144  engineering@gradyminor.com  www.gradyminor.com EXHIBIT B FOR HAMILTON PLACE RPUD DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Exhibit B sets forth the development standards for land uses within the Hamilton Place RPUD Subdistrict. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or subdivision plat. STANDARDS SINGLE- FAMILY DETACHED VARIABLE LOT LINE FOR SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED MULTI- FAMILY TOWNHOUSE AMENITY CENTER Minimum Lot Area 5,000 SF 4,000 SF 3,500 SF 1 acre 1,600 SF 103,000 SF Minimum Lot Width *3 50 feet 40 feet 35 feet 100 feet 20 feet N/A Minimum Lot Depth 100 feet 100 feet 100 feet 100 feet 80 feet N/A Minimum Front Yard *1,*6 20 feet *2 20 feet *2 20 feet *2 20 feet 20 feet *2 N/A Minimum Side Yard 5 feet 0 - 10 feet *4 0 or 5 feet 10 feet 0 or 5 feet N/A Minimum Rear Yard *6 Principal 15 feet 15 feet 15 feet 15 feet 0 feet from LBT or LMT N/A Maximum Height Zoned (not to exceed 2 stories) Actual (not to exceed 2 stories) 30 feet 35 feet 30 feet 35 feet 30 feet 35 feet 30 feet 35 feet 30 feet 35 feet 30 feet 35 feet Minimum Distance Between Principal Structures *5 12 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 5 feet detached 0 feet attached N/A Floor Area Min. (S.F.) 1500 SF 1000 SF 1000 SF 1000 SF 1000 SF N/A PUD Boundary 40 feet 40 feet 40 feet 40 feet 40 feet 40 feet Hamilton Place RPUD (PDI-PL20190000097) Proposed PUD Revisions Words underlined are additions; words struck through are deletions April 29, 2019 Page 2 of 3 Proposed PUD Revisions 2019.docx Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134  239-947-1144  engineering@gradyminor.com  www.gradyminor.com Preserve 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet ACCESSORY STRUCTURES Front *2 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet Side 5 feet 0 feet 0 feet 10 feet 0 feet 10 feet Minimum Rear Yard *6 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet N/A PUD Boundary 40 feet 40 feet 40 feet 40 feet 40 feet 40 feet Preserve 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet Minimum Distance Between Structures 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 5 feet detached 0 feet attached 10 feet Maximum Height Zoned (not to exceed 2 stories) Actual (not to exceed 2 stories) 25 feet 30 feet 25 feet 30 feet 25 feet 30 feet 25 feet 30 feet 25 feet 30 feet 25 feet 30 feet *** *** *** *** *** Text break *** *** *** *** *** LBT – Landscape Buffer Tract LMT – Lake Maintenance Tract Hamilton Place RPUD (PDI-PL20190000097) Proposed PUD Revisions Words underlined are additions; words struck through are deletions April 29, 2019 Page 3 of 3 Proposed PUD Revisions 2019.docx Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134  239-947-1144  engineering@gradyminor.com  www.gradyminor.com EXHIBIT F FOR HAMILTON PLACE RPUD LIST OF DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS 1. PUD MONITORING One entity (hereinafter the Managing Entity) shall be responsible for PUD monitoring until close-out of the PUD, and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUD commitments until close-out of the PUD. At the time of this PUD approval, the Managing Entity is WCI Communities, LLCToll Bros., Inc., 24301 24201 Walden Center Drive, Ste. 204, Bonita Springs, FL 34135. Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity, then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document that needs to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. After such approval, the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts, the Managing Entity shall provide written notice to County that includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required by the PUD by the new owner and the new owner’s agreement to comply with the Commitments through the Managing Entity, but the Managing Entity shall not be relieved of its responsibility under this Section. When the PUD is closed-out, then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment of PUD commitments. PL20190000097 500' 5/7/2019 Site: Hamilton Place RPUD 1 NAME1 NAME2 NAME3 NAME4 NAME5 NAME6 LEGAL1 LEGAL2 LEGAL3 LEGAL4 12910 POSITANO CIR RLTY TRUST 5 GOLDENROD LANE LYNNFIELD, MA 01940---1620 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1100-205 12960 POSITANO CIRCLE #203 LLC 5548 FOXHUNT WAY NAPLES, FL 34104---4903 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 600-203 12965 POSITANO CI #307 LLC 663 HICKORY RD NAPLES, FL 34108---2638 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 700-307 12965 POSITANO CIRLCE #307 LLC 663 HICKORY RD NAPLES, FL 34108---2638 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 900-307 13010 POSITANO CIRCLE #306 LAND TRUST 145 CUNNINGHAM DRIVE BARRIE L4N 5R3 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1500-306 1489580 ONTARIO INC % BRENT BAILEY BOX 704 ALLISTN L9R 1U9 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 800-306 1510 SERRANO CIRCLE LLC 6251 UPPER ALBANY CROSSING DR WESTERVILLE, OH 43081---0 ANDALUCIA LOT 37 9119841 CANADA INC 345 BARTON ST STONEY CREEK L8E 2L2 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1000-308 9119841 CANADA INC 345 BARTON ST STONEY CREEK L8E 2L2 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM PGA 494 ACHILIA SERVICES INC 12936 VIOLINO LN APT 301 NAPLES, FL 34105---4928 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM PGD A-3 ACHILIA SERVICES INC 12936 VIOLINO LN APT 301 NAPLES, FL 34105---4928 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1100-301 ALAN B HARRIS REV TRUST 30 3RD AVE S NAPLES, FL 34102---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1400-207 ALLISON, KAREN 1486 SERRANO CIRCLE NAPLES, FL 34105---0 ANDALUCIA LOT 31 ALTMANN, KURT & EVELYN 516 W 149TH STREET NEW YORK, NY 10031---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 200-206 AMEN, CHRISTOPHER M CHRISTINE E AMEN 1262 QUIET CIR CONCORD, CA 94521---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 900-303 ANDALUCIA HOMEOWNERS ASSOC INC % SANDCASTLE COMM MGMT 9150 GALLERIA CT #201 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 ANDALUCIA TRACT P-2 ANDALUCIA HOMEOWNERS ASSOC INC % SANDCASTLE COMM MGMT 9150 GALLERIA CT #201 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 ANDALUCIA TRACT R ANDALUCIA HOMEOWNERS ASSOC INC % SANDCASTLE COMM MGMT 9150 GALLERIA CT #201 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 ANDALUCIA TRACT P-1 ANDALUCIA HOMEOWNERS ASSOC INC %SANDCASTLE COMM MGMT 9150 GALLERIA CT #201 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 ANDALUCIA TRACT E ANDREWS, DONALD E & CAROLYN M 3156 SUNDANCE CIR NAPLES, FL 34109---8921 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM PGD A-2 ANDREWS, DONALD E & CAROLYN M 3156 SUNDANCE CIR NAPLES, FL 34109---8921 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 100-202 ANGELO CUSINATO REV TRUST KATHLEEN M CUSINATO REV TRUST ALLAN POTSIC 3543 WOODRIDGE PL PALM HARBOR, FL 34684---2435 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM PGA 505 ANN MARIE HAMILTON REV TRUST 12935 VIOLINO LN #204 NAPLES, FL 34105---4924 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1200-204 ANSTETT, ROBERT H CHRISTINA N ANSTETT 1458 SERRANO CIRCLE NAPLES, FL 34105---0 ANDALUCIA LOT 24 ARABIDZE, IRAKLI EDYTA M GRABOWSKA 1438 SERRANO CIR NAPLES, FL 34105---0 ANDALUCIA LOT 19 ARAMBALIS, ANGELO & BESSIE 71 HALIBURTON AVENUE TORONTO M9B 4Y6 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 200-107 ASTERTRADING COMPANY LLC 1200 GOODLETTE ROAD N #7255 NAPLES, FL 34102---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1500-106 ASTRIN, PETIA J 12970 POSITANO CIRCLE #106 NAPLES, FL 34105---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 800-106 ATKINS, HOWARD H MICHAEL DEAN MAUPIN PO BOX 14787 CINCINNATI, OH 45250---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 800-203 ATKINS, HOWARD H MICHAEL DEAN MAUPIN PO BOX 14787 CINCINNATI, OH 45250---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM PGD D-2 AUSTIN, NANCY R 12940 POSITANO CIR #106 NAPLES, FL 34105---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 300-106 AVOW REAL ESTATE INC 1095 WHIPPOORWILL LANE NAPLES, FL 34105---3847 18 49 26 N1/2 OF N1/2 OF SE1/4 OF NW1/4 AND S 60FT OF E1/2 OF NE1/4 OF NW1/4 AND N1/2 OF S1/2 OF N1/2 OF SE1/4 OF NW1/4 AZZOPARDI, DAVID B & ROBIN L 1446 SERRANO CIR NAPLES, FL 34105---4951 ANDALUCIA LOT 21 BACHE, DENNIS M & DANA M 170 W PLAIN ST WAYLAND, MA 01778---4320 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 100-101 BAILEY, BRENT BOX 704 ALLISTON L9R 1V9 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1500-304 BAKER TR, MARK & SOUMAYA 28 JAMES ST NIAGARA -LK L0S 1J0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 600-302 BAKER TR, MARK & SOUMAYA 28 JAMES ST NIAGARA-LK L0S 1J0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM PGA 521 BALGOJEVIC, MARINKO MARIJA GLAUG BLAGOJEVIC MARKO BLAGOJEVIC 526 MELROSE AVE TORONTO M5M 2A2 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 100-301 BALTMISKIS, FRANCIS J 8210 RAINTREE LN CHARLOTTE, NC 28277---9861 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1000-101 BANGALA, DANIEL & CLAUDIA 2 GETZ PARK THORNHILL L4J 9B3 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM PGA 97 BANGALA, DANIEL & CLAUDIA 2 GETZ PARK THORNHILL L4J 9B3 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 500-102 BARBIERO, AMEDEO & GIUSEPPINA 32 BIRCH AVE CALEDON L7E 0K2 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM PGA 437 BARBIERO, AMEDEO & GIUSEPPINA 32 BIRCH AVE CALEDON L7E 0K2 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 300-308 BARBIERO, AMEDEO & GIUSEPPNA 32 BIRCH AVE CALEDON L7E 0K2 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1300-205 BARDIS, EFTERPI D 1571 WINDAMERE LN NAPLES, FL 34119---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 600-206 BARRE, MICHELLE A 12980 POSITANO CIRCLE UNIT 307 NAPLES, FL 34105---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM PGD B-12 BARRE, MICHELLE A 12980 POSITANO CIRCLE UNIT 307 NAPLES, FL 34105---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1000-307 BARROSO LANTIGUA, MISAEL YUSIK EXPOSITO CARDENAS 13000 POSITANO CIR #202 NAPLES, FL 34105---4917 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1400-202 BASS, WESLEY BETTY A HOM 12970 POSITANO CIR #304 NAPLES, FL 34105---4905 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 800-304 BASS, WESLEY BETTY A HOM 2614 TAMIAMI TRAIL NORTH #500 NAPLES, FL 34103---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM PGA 507 BASSILA, JAY 68 SUMMIT CIRCLE WESTMOUNT H3Y 1B5 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 900-301 BELKNAP ET AL, BRENT H 1593 SERRANO CIR NAPLES, FL 34105---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1400-203 BENDER, JESSICA MICHELLE 5465 NW 108TH WAY CORAL SPRINGS, FL 33076---2744 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1400-108 BENDER. JESSICA MICHELLE 5465 NW 108TH WAY CORAL SPRINGS, FL 33076---2744 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM PGA 324 BERMAN, SETH 12980 POSITANO CIRCLE #107 NAPLES, FL 34105---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1000-107 BLAGOJEVIC, MARINKO MARIJA GLAUG BLAGOJEVIC MARKO BLAGOJEVIC 526 MELROSE AVENUE TORONTO M5M 2A2 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1500-201 BORS, CRISTIAN & CORINA 52 KNOLL VIEW CRES TORONTO M2K 2E2 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 800-207 BOUDEWIJN, AGATHA B 1450 SERRANO CIR NAPLES, FL 34105---4951 ANDALUCIA LOT 22 BRADER, JUDITH J & BARRY R 820 BENTWOOD DR NAPLES, FL 34108---8203 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 700-308 BRAY, CHRISTOPHER P ANN MARIE M MAROSHEK 12840 BRYNWOOD WAY NAPLES, FL 34105---4807 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LOT 58 BRINKMEYER, JAMES 12965 POSITANO CIR #201 NAPLES, FL 34105---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 700-201 BROWN, GLENN R & JANE E 12862 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LN NAPLES, FL 34105---4803 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LOT 36 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE RESIDENTS ASSOCIATION INC % SANDCASTLE COMM MGMT 9150 GALLERIA CT #201 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE TRACT B BRYNWOOD PRESERVE RESIDENTS ASSOCIATION INC % SANDCASTLE COMM MGMT 9150 GALLERIA CT #201 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE TRACT R LESS W 30FT BRYNWOOD PRESERVE RESIDENTS ASSOCIATION INC % SANDCASTLE COMM MGMT 9150 GALLERIA CT #201 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE TRACT C LESS W 30FT BRYNWOOD PRESERVE RESIDENTS ASSOCIATION INC % SANDCASTLE COMM MGMT 9150 GALLERIA CT #201 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE TRACT CA P-1 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE RESIDENTS ASSOCIATION INC % SANDCASTLE COMM MGMT 9150 GALLERIA CT #201 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE WLY 30FT OF TR'S C,D & R BURMAN, ALBERT & LUDMILA 4030 BLAKE LANE GLENVIEW, IL 60026---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 800-104 BURMAN, ALBERT & LUDMILA 4030 BLAKE LANE GLENVIEW, IL 60026---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM PGD D-1 BUTLER, JAMES E & RUBY 9930 ROOKERY CIR ESTERO, FL 33928---3044 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1100-203 CADIEUX, ANDRE LIN LI 4020 LOUVIERS BROSSARD J4Y 0J2 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 700-306 CAMPBELL, CHARLES R & ANN R 103 CLUBHOUSE LN #285 NAPLES, FL 34105---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 900-305 CAMPOAMOR, FRANK J 12856 BRYNWOOD WAY NAPLES, FL 34105---4807 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LOT 54 CANNAN, ROBERT JONATHAN CANNAN 1103 TIVOLI DR NAPLES, FL 34104---0 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LOT 45 CARIAGA, JUAN L 4610 ST CROIX LANE #1037 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1100-303 CARR, JAMES S JEAN-RAGELIE-CARR 10816 ROYAL GLEN DR ORLAND PARK, IL 60467---0 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LOT 57 CARTWRIGHT, DAYLE 1170 RESERVE WAY #303 NAPLES, FL 34105---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 600-106 CARUSO JR, ANTHONY 259 MATCHAPONIX AVE MONROE TOWNSHIP, NJ 08831---4080 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 300-204 CASELLA, LISA 46 NOTUS AVENUE STATEN ISLAND, NY 10312---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 400-305 CASERINVERSIONES LLC 5425 GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY SUITE 7 NAPLES, FL 34116---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM PGD C-8 CASERINVERSIONES LLC 5425 GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY SUITE 7 NAPLES, FL 34116---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 700-202 CATHCART, VAN W & DEBRA A 8 FIELD CREST LN CAPE MAY CRT HSE, NJ 08210---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1000-303 CHALASANI, VIDYA D SATYA DEVI CHALASANI 11913 AUTUMN FERN LN ORLANDO, FL 32827---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 500-207 CHATEAUVERT, DENIS R & JULIE A 2162 VALENCEVILLE CRESENT ORLEANS K4A 4K4 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM PGA 490 CHATEAUVERT, DENIS R & JULIE A 2162 VALENCEVILLE CRESENT ORLEANS K4A 4K4 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1000-108 CHEHADE, JOYCE 2671 DE CHAMONIX SAINT LAURENT H4R 2Y7 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1200-207 CHEHADE, JOYCE 2671 DE CHAMONIX SAINT LAURENT H4T 2Y7 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM PGA 369 CHELO, KARA L GARY J=& LYNNE CHELO 289 ROBIN HOLLOW RD W GREENWICH, RI 02817---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM PGA 509 CHELO, KARA L GARY J=& LYNNE E CHELO 289 ROBIN HOLLOW RD W GREENWICH, RI 02817---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 800-208 CHEN, CHIA-LIN 3282 BANCROFT RD FAIRLAWN, OH 44333---3048 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 200-203 CHEN, CHIA-LIN 3282 BANCROFT RD FAIRLAWN, OH 44333---3048 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM PGD A-8 CHI, TU H & MARIANNE 1457 SERRANO CIR NAPLES, FL 34105---4952 ANDALUCIA LOT 127 CHIELLA, ANTONIO & RENATA 3104 POST RD OAKVILLE L6H 0V3 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 900-201 CHIELLA, ANTONIO & RENATA 3104 POST RD OAKVILLE L6H 0V3 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM PGD D-7 CHIUMENTO SR, JOSEPH A JOANNE C CHIUMENTO 12950 POSITANO CIR #308 NAPLES, FL 34105---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 400-308 CHIUMENTO SR, JOSEPH A JOANNE C CHIUMENTO 12950 POSITANO CIRCLE UNIT 308 NAPLES, FL 34105---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM PGA 539 CHIUMENTO, GIA 12955 POSITANO CIRCLE #206 NAPLES, FL 34105---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 500-206 CHUGANI, HARRY T & DIANE M 703 MOUNT LEBANON RD WILMINGTON, DE 19803---0 ANDALUCIA LOT 23 CIFUENTES, JULIO E 12980 POSITANO CIRCLE UNIT 201 NAPLES, FL 34105---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1000-201 CLARK, EMILIE MAE 12936 VIOLINO LN #304 NAPLES, FL 34105---4928 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1100-304 COFONE, CARLO & DIANE 389 RIDGEWOOD BLVD N WASHINGTON TWSP, NJ 07676---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM PGA 537 COFONE, CARLO & DIANE 389 RIDGEWOOD BOULEVARD N WASHINGTON TOWNS, NJ 07676---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 400-304 COLBY III, CALVIN F 12960 POSITANO CIR #306 NAPLES, FL 34105---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 600-306 COLUCCI, ROBERT S & MARIANNE 79 SUSAN DR NEW CITY, NY 10956---4027 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 300-208 COSBY, CHARLES C ESHA KAPLAN 7010 RAGLAND ROAD CINCINNATI, OH 45244---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM PGA 416 COUGHLIN, MICHAEL J EILEEN T O'DONOGHUE-COUGHLIN 10100 E TANGLEWOOD CIR PALOS PARK, IL 60464---2612 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 400-201 POList_500_PL20190000097.xls PL20190000097 500' 5/7/2019 Site: Hamilton Place RPUD 2 COUGHLIN, MICHAEL J EILEEN T O'DONOGHUE-COUGHLIN 10100 E TANGLEWOOD CIR PALOS PARK, IL 60464---2612 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM PGD C-1 COVINO, JAMES B & BARBARA A 12914 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LN NAPLES, FL 34105---4803 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LOT 49 CRD ASSET PROTECTION TRUST 13010 POSITANO CIR #104 NAPLES, FL 34105---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1500-104 CRF SHOVEL LLC 2265 ROYAL LANE NAPLES, FL 34112---0 NAPLES MOTOR CONDOS A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 306 CROSSMAN, HOWARD F & SHEILA O 2306 TRADITION WAY #201 NAPLES, FL 34105---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 400-104 CRUCERU, DELIA & GABRIEL 48 APPLETON TRAIL BRAMPTON L6W 4L6 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 500-201 CRUCERU, GABRIEL & DELIA 48 APPLETON TRAIL BRAMPTON L6W 4L6 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 600-305 CUOC INC PO BOX 7158 NAPLES, FL 34101---0 NAPLES MOTOR CONDOS A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 308 CUSINATO, ANGELO ALLAN POTSIC 3543 WOODRIDGE PL PALM HARBOR, FL 34684---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 800-202 CUTRONE, TANYA 12885 BRYNWOOD WAY NAPLES, FL 34105---0 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LOT 71 D J & S G CHRISTOFORE TRUST 4845 WEST 151ST TERRACE LEAWOOD, KS 66224---0 ANDALUCIA LOT 28 D&K BOLTON FAMILY TRUST 1691 SUTTON ROAD SHAVERTOWN, PA 18708---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1100-108 D&K BOLTON FAMILY TRUST 1691 SUTTON ROAD SHAVERTOWN, PA 18708---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM PGA 466 DALE C SPAHR LIVING TRUST 1035 3RD AVE S #101 NAPLES, FL 34102---0 NAPLES MOTOR CONDOS A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 208 DAYAN, JACOB 12975 POSITANO CIR #205 NAPLES, FL 34105---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 900-205 DEARMAS, EDUARDO & MARIA LUISA 12901 BRYNWOOD WAY NAPLES, FL 34105---4806 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LOT 75 DEBORAH A WHIFFEN LIVING TRUST 12935 VIOLINO LANE #106 NAPLES, FL 34106---775 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1200-106 DEGNAN, BRIAN T PO BOX 1082 WEXFORD, PA 15090---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1300-203 DEMAIO, SAMANTHA 5 FIELDSTONE CT EAST HANOVER, NJ 07936---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 500-104 DENG, RUI HONG HUI MING CHEN 12804 BRYNWOOD WAY NAPLES, FL 34105---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 800-307 DENG, RUI HONG HUI MING CHEN 12804 BRYNWOOD WAY NAPLES, FL 34105---4807 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LOT 67 DENTE ET AL, JOHN F % VINCENT UCCI 9 YVETTE DR E HANOVER, NJ 07936---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1300-104 DENTE ET AL, JOHN F % VINCENT UCCI 9 YVETTE DR E HANOVER, NJ 07936---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM PGA 348 DERBY, ALEX R 8129 LAS PALMAS WAY NAPLES, FL 34109---7135 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 200-307 DHALIWAL, BALWINDER S 214 ROLLINGWOOD DR BRAMPTON L6Y 5J6 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 300-203 DI GIOVANNI, STEPHEN & MARIA G 86 SOUTH MANOR COURT WALL TOWNSHIP, NJ 07719---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 200-106 DICELLO, ANTHONY 117 EDGEWATER CV LAKEWAY, TX 78734---3462 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM PGD D-8 DICELLO, ANTHONY 117 EDGEWATER CV LAKEWAY, TX 78734---3462 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 900-208 DINCA, FLAVIU & GABRIELA 12 KIMONO CRESCENT RICHMOND HILL L4S 1X5 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM PGD C-11 DINCA, FLAVIU & GABRIELA 12 KIMONO CRESCENT RICHMOND HILL L4S 1X5 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 200-306 DINCA, FLAVIU & GABRIELA 12 KIMONO CRESCENT RICHMOND HILL L4S 1X5 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 500-304 DINCA, FLAVIU & GABRIELA 12 KIMONO CRESCENT RICHMOND HILL L4S 1X5 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 300-202 DINCA, FLAVIU & GABRIELA 12 KIMONO CRESCENT RICHMOND HILLS L4S 1X5 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM PGD C-10 DINESCU, SORIN RODICA DINESCU 8 THATCHER CRESCENT E GWILLIMBURY L9N 0B8 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM PGD A-1 DINESCU, SORIN RODICA DINESCU 8-THATCHER CRESCENT EAST GWILLIMBURY L9N 0B8 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 100-208 DISABATO, DANTE F 1477 SERRANO CIRCLE NAPLES, FL 34105---0 ANDALUCIA LOT 132 DIXON, KOREY 13000 POSITANO CIR #305 NAPLES, FL 34105---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1400-305 DOANE, TERESA WEBB 12877 BRYNWOOD WAY NAPLES, FL 34105---0 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LOT 69 DOLL, ALEX JASON 12820 BRYNWOOD WAY NAPLES, FL 34105---4807 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LOT 63 DOMBROWSKI, GREGORY J 6514 MONTEREY PT #102 NAPLES, FL 34105---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1100-206 DOMIZIO, FRANK CARLO GENTILE 1089 MANNINGTON CT MISSISSAUGA L4W 3K8 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 100-204 DOMIZIO, SALVATORE FERNANDO G CUNHA 2210 WATSON ORCHARD RD MISSISSAUGA L4Y 1Y2 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1200-104 DONOFRIO, FRANCO LISA MARIE LEFEBVRE 10455 AVENUE DE LESPLANADE MONTREAL H3L 2 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM PGA 116 DONOFRIO, FRANCO LISA MARIE LEFEBVRE 10455 AVENUE DE L'ESPLANADE MONTREAL H3L 2Y1 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 700-301 DROVER, JOSEPH W & KELLY M 8472 DOLFOR CV BURR RIDGE, IL 60527---6328 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM PGD B-6 DUFAULT, MARC & ALENA 2233 DES CARTES STREET ORLEANS K4A 0W4 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM PGA 394 DUFAULT, MARC & ALENA 2233 DESCARTES ST ORLEANS K4A 0W4 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 200-304 DUGALL, TOM W291N3840 ROUND HILL CIRCLE PEWAUKEE, WI 53072---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 400-302 DUMITRU, GHEORGHE & MIRELA 192 VELMAR DR WOODBRIDGE L4L 8J5 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1400-205 DURKOVIC, PETER NASER SANZILET DURKOVIC 14344 37TH AVE FLUSHING, NY 11354---5739 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1000-207 DYER, ROBERT A & ESTRELLA M 401 RIDING RIDGE RD ANNAPOLIS, MD 21403---1670 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 400-202 EBERTZ, MICHAEL J 1220 TONKAWA RD ORONO, MN 55356---9242 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 300-206 EDWARD J & SHIRLEY J CZARNY FAMILY TRUST 7103 W KEENEY ST NILES, IL 60714---3039 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 100-306 EGUEZ DOMINGUEZ, LUIS A LAURA H ORTEGA CARPIO 12950 POSITANO CIR APT 203 NAPLES, FL 34105---4890 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 400-203 EGUEZ DOMINGUEZ, LUIS A LAURA H ORTEGA CARPIO 12950 POSITANO CIR APT203 NAPLES, FL 34105---4890 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM PGD C-5 ELFRIEDA H SUTHERLAND TRUST C/O GAYLE ANN DURRANCE 2076 SAGEBRUSH CIR NAPLES, FL 34120---4568 18 49 26 W 264FT + E 264FT OF FOLL, S1/2 OF S1/2 OF SW1/4 OF NW1/4 3.94 AC ELKAIM, ROGER 11 RUE DE COLMAR LE VERDI CANNES 06400 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 100-106 ENDRE MOLNAR LLC 7502 SILVER TRUMPET LANE #204 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 NAPLES MOTOR CONDOS A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 309 ENGLISCH, RENATE % THOMAS SCHALLER 3308 EUROPA DR APT 27 NAPLES, FL 34105---5606 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LOT 56 EQUITY TRUST COMPANY % STEPHEN RALSTON 566 BEGIER AVE SAN LEANDRO, CA 94577---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM PGA 328 EQUITY TRUST COMPANY % STEPHEN RALSTON 566 BEGIER AVE SAN LEANDRO, CA 94577---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1400-304 ERICKSON, JAMES R MEENA ERICKSON 1453 SERRANO CIR NAPLES, FL 34105---0 ANDALUCIA LOT 126 ERRICO, KEITH A & MARIA A 470 CHESTNUT STREET WASHINGTON TWN, NJ 07676---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 500-306 FABIANI, DARRYL & SONYA 452 SOUTH CARRIAGE WAY LONDON N6G 0B2 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1400-104 FAIRHOMES SILVER LININGS PROPERTIES LLC 10 STATION LN UNIONVILLE L3R 1R4 ANDALUCIA LOT 20 FALCIONE, KAREN L MICHAEL FALCIONE 307 MEL JEN DR NAPLES, FL 34105---6318 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1500-208 FALCIONE, KAREN L MICHAEL FALCIONE 307 MEL JEN DR NAPLES, FL 34105---6318 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM PGA 297 FALLON, JOHN & FRANCES 19 HARTLAND ROAD STONEY CREEK L8E 6C4 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1000-302 FEDOR, THOMAS S & LUCIA M 10994 WHARTON LANE FISHERS, IN 46038---0 ANDALUCIA LOT 137 FELICIANO, WENDELL A 12864 BRYNWOOD WAY NAPLES, FL 34105---0 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LOT 52 FERNANDEZ, ERIC J 6 S LIBERTY DR SOUTH BARRINGTON, IL 60010---9119 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM PGA 529 FERNANDEZ, ERIC J 6 S LIBERTY DR SOUTH BARRINGTON, IL 60010---9119 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 600-101 FERRAIOLO, JOHN & PAULA 282 NASSAU RD HUNTINGTON, NY 11743---4327 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 600-301 FERRARO, THERESA N 13010 POSITANO CIR APT 301 NAPLES, FL 34105---4921 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1500-301 FIOETTI, RICHARD E & BRENDA C 1683 PERSIMMON DR NAPLES, FL 34109---307 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM PGD A-6 FIORETTI, RICHARD E & BRENDA C 1683 PERSIMMON DR NAPLES, FL 34109---307 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 200-102 FLEISCHER, STEPHEN R PO BOX 2499 NAPLES, FL 34106---0 NAPLES MOTOR CONDOS A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 307 FLYNN, WALTER 20817 W 68TH TERR SHAWNEE, KS 66218---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1400-101 FLYNN, WALTER 20817 W 68TH TERR SHAWNEE, KS 66218---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM PGD A-11 FORMAN, ROBERT S & DEBORAH J 370 SABAL WAY WESTON, FL 33326---3311 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM PGA 410 FORMAN, ROBERT S & DEBORAH J 370 SABAL WAY WESTON, FL 33326---3311 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM PGA 392 FORMAN, ROBERT S & DEBORAH J 370 SABAL WAY WESTON, FL 33326---3311 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 200-202 FORMAN, ROBERT S & DEBORAH J 370 SABAL WAY WESTON, FL 33326---3311 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 100-102 FORNARELLI, NICOLO & ROSA S 13010 POSITANO CIRCLE #307 NAPLES, FL 34105---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM PGA 295 FORNARELLI, NICOLO & ROSA S 13010 POSITANO CIRCLE #307 NAPLES, FL 34105---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1500-307 FOSTER, JAMES L & CHERYL LYNN 12975 POSITANO CIR #104 NAPLES, FL 34105---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 900-104 FOSTER, JAMES L & CHRYL LYNN 12975 POSITANO CIRCLE #104 NAPLES, FL 34105---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM PGA 131 FOTO, PIETRO & DARLENE 3620 PONYTAIL DR MISSISSAUGA L4X 1W4 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1200-305 FOTO, PIETRO ANTONIO DARLENE G FOTO 3620 PONYTAIL DRIVE MISSISSAUGA L4X 1W4 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1200-308 FRANKLIN, ROBERT A 12965 POSITANO CIR #101 NAPLES, FL 34105---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM PGA 120 FRANKLIN, ROBERT A 12965 POSITANO CIR #101 NAPLES, FL 34105---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 700-101 FREIBERT, SHARON & JOHN E JR SHAWN R FREIBERT 1017 CHAMPIONS CIR SIMPSONVILLE, KY 40067---6567 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1400-201 FREIBERT, SHARON & JOHN E JR SHAWN R FREIBERT 1017 CHAMPIONS CIR SIMPSONVILLE, KY 40067---6567 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1000-304 FTEJA, HYSEN 1461 SERRANO CIR NAPLES, FL 34105---4952 ANDALUCIA LOT 128 G&L CONSTRUCTION LLC 6301 S GRAND PRAIRIE DR SIOUX FALLS, SD 57108---5301 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 200-101 G&R INTERNATIONAL LLC 4560 BRUNSON PLACE TRAVERSE CITY, MI 49684---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 200-301 G&R INTERNATIONAL LLC 4560 BRUNSON PLACE TRAVERSE CITY, MI 49684---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM PGA 398 GALE, JOSEPH B MELODIE GILLET 12980 POSITANO CIR #104 NAPLES, FL 34105---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1000-104 GAVULIC FAMILY TRUST 235 E ROLSTON RD LINDEN, MI 48451---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1200-203 GENTILE, CARLO FRANK DOMIZIO 1089 MANNINGTON COURT MISSISSAUGA L4W 3K8 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM PGA 412 GENTILE, CARLO FRANK DOMIZIO 1089 MANNINGTON COURT MISSISSAUGA L4W 3K8 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 100-108 GEORGE, NICK CORPORATE OFFICE 8313 HOLLY RD STE C GRAND BLANC, MI 48439---2484 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1200-101 GESIMONDO, JANINE 13000 POSITANO CIRCLE #306 NAPLES, FL 34105---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1400-306 GHUMAN, A TOM & KIMBERLY 1490 SERRANO CIR NAPLES, FL 34105---4951 ANDALUCIA LOT 32 GIANNONE, NICHOLAS J HILDA BERNHARDT GIANNONE 142 BENNINGTON DR APT 3 # 4 NAPLES, FL 34104---1306 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 600-307 GIARRAPUTO, LEONARD J LINDA A GIARRAPUTO 11 OVERLOOK CT MEDFORD, NJ 08055---3834 ANDALUCIA LOT 129 GILBERTO, MATTHEW GINA GILBERTO 12930 POSITANO CIRCLE #305 NAPLES, FL 34105---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 200-305 POList_500_PL20190000097.xls PL20190000097 500' 5/7/2019 Site: Hamilton Place RPUD 3 GILLESPIE, NANCY 12975 POSITANO CIRCLE #302 NAPLES, FL 34105---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 900-302 GLADDEN, THOMAS R & CHRISTINA 12970 POSITANO CIR APT 305 NAPLES, FL 34105---4905 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 800-305 GOETZ, MICHAEL & JERI L 32 FAY ROAD DEDAM, MA 02026---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 400-306 GROVE, TIMOTHY G & CHARI K 1534 WINDY RIDGE CT SALINE, MI 48176---9420 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM PGA 95 GROVE, TIMOTHY G & CHARI K 1534 WINDY RIDGE CT SALINE, MI 48176---9420 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 500-302 GULAS, MILTIADE & DANA 1096 QUAKER TRAIL NEW MARKET L3X 3E2 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 900-304 GULAS, MILTIADE & DANA 1096 QUAKER TRAIL NEW MARKET L3X 3E2 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM PGD D-10 GULER, DIDEM 6644 MARBELLA DR NAPLES, FL 34105---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM PGA 103 GULER, DIDEM 6644 MARBELLA DR NAPLES, FL 34105---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 500-308 GULER, DIDEM 6644 MARBELLA DR NAPLES, FL 34105---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1000-208 GULER, DIDEM 6644 MARBELLA DR NAPLES, FL 34105---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM PGD B-5 GULER, DIDEM 6644 MARBELLA DRIVE NAPLES, FL 34105---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM PGA 441 GULER, DIDEM 6644 MARBELLA DRIVE NAPLES, FL 34105---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 300-107 GULER, DIDEM 6644 MARBELLA DRIVE NAPLES, FL 34105---4888 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 300-205 GUROCAK, SERPIL 12936 VIOLINO LANE NAPLES, FL 34105---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM PGA 470 GUROCAK, SERPIL 12936 VIOLINO LANE NAPLES, FL 34105---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1100-208 GUZMAN, GIOVANNI A 12975 POSITANO CIR #306 NAPLES, FL 34105---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 900-306 HA, HUE THANH THI CUE T HA 20 WEBER BLVD S NAPLES, FL 34117---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 400-108 HA, HUE THANH THI CUE T HA 20 WEBER BLVD S NAPLES, FL 34117---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM PGA 545 HAGEDORN, AMY C 12980 POSITANO CIR APT 205 NAPLES, FL 34105---4911 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1000-205 HAMILTON, ANN M 12935 VIOLINO LN #204 NAPLES, FL 34105---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM PGA 373 HAROLD B BOND REV TRUST 2007 233 E PRAIRIE AVE WHEATON, IL 60187---0 NAPLES MOTOR CONDOS A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 108 HAROLD B BOND REV TRUST 2007 233 E PRAIRIE AVE WHEATON, IL 60187---0 NAPLES MOTOR CONDOS A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 107 HARRISON, ROBERT J & GINA 11 CAROL RD BUZZARDS BAY, MA 02532---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM PGD D-9 HARRISON, ROBERT J & GINA 11 CAROL RD BUZZARDS BAY, MA 02532---4825 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 800-301 HART, DANN D 4486 S SHORE ST WATERFORD, MI 48328---1160 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1100-201 HART, DANN D 4486 S SHORE ST WATERFORD, MI 48328---1160 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM PGD B-10 HART, DANN D 4486 SOUTH SHORE STREET WATERFORD, MI 48328---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 100-307 HART, DANN D 4486 SOUTH SHORE STREET WATERFORD, MI 48328---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM PGA 414 HASSON, DAVIS WAYNE 12935 VIOLINO LN #102 NAPLES, FL 34105---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1200-102 HAYDEN, SCOTT SANDRA D HAYDEN 12940 POSITANO CIRCLE UNIT 207 NAPLES, FL 33942---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 300-207 HELGREN, BLAKE GARRETT ROBERT D & BEVERLY C HELGREN 12936 VIOLINO LN APT 305 NAPLES, FL 34105---4928 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1100-305 HENRIQUEZ, KLEBER SANTINA STUMPO 29 ASHFIELD DRIVE TORONTO M9C 4T7 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1000-206 HENRIQUEZ, KLEBER ALEJANDRO SANTINA STUMPO 12980 POSITANO CIR NAPLES, FL 34105---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1000-204 HENRIQUEZ, KLEBER ALEJANDRO SANTINA STUMPO 12980 POSITANO CIR UNIT 204 NAPLES, FL 34105---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM PGA 488 HERBERT, GREG A & SUSI 3739 SPRING LAKE LN OWINGS MILLS, MD 21117---1431 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1100-104 HERNANDEZ, ANGELICA & CESAR 1466 SERRANO CIRCLE NAPLES, FL 34105---0 ANDALUCIA LOT 26 HERRICK, PAUL ANN HERRICK 5 JEFFERSON DR REVERE, MA 02151---2186 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1300-106 HEWITT, CURTIS & DEBORAH 9311 DAYFLOWER ST PROSPECT, KY 40059---7585 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 300-302 HEWITT, CURTIS & DEBORAH 9311 DAYFLOWER STREET PROSPECT, KY 40059---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM PGD C-12 HIWASSE INC % JOHN N BRUGGER TR KENSINGTON PARK C/O NEWELL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 5435 JAEGER RD STE 4 NAPLES, FL 34109---5802 13 49 25 E 510 FT OF SE 1/4 &E 510 FT SE 1/4 OF NE 1/4 LESS COM AT SE CNR SEC 13, N2126.61 FT, W 120FT TO POB, W 390 FT, HOSAPOS LLC 1677 SERRANO CIR NAPLES, FL 34105---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM PGA 301 HOSAPOS LLC 4940 WESTCHESTER CT APT 3704 NAPLES, FL 34105---6670 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1500-108 HRISTOVSKI, MARJAN & MARIA 12874 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LN NAPLES, FL 34105---4803 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LOT 39 HUGHES, JOHN 12930 POSITANO CIRCLE #201 NAPLES, FL 34210---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 200-201 HUGHES, NORMAN PETER HAZEL PAULINE HUGHES WATERFIELD BASLOW ROAD BAKEWELL DERBYSHIRE DE45 1AB POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1200-208 HUGHES, NORMAN PETER HAZEL PAULINE HUGHES WATERFIELD BASLOW ROAD BAKEWELL DERBYSHIRE DE45 1AB POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM PGA 371 HURST, KAY C 1323 SW 104TH ST GAINESVILLE, FL 32607---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1500-308 HURST, KAY C 1323 SW 104TH ST GAINESVILLE, FL 32607---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM PGA 293 HUTTERLY, JOHN T CHERYL WILSON 1270 11TH CT N NAPLES, FL 34102---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM PGD A-4 HUTTERLY, JOHN T CHERYL WILSON 12930 POSITANO CIR APT 207 NAPLES, FL 34105---4864 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 200-207 ILAN WEISS REV LIV TRUST II 2611 CENTRAL AVE BALDWIN, NY 11510---3634 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM PGA 468 ILAN WEISS REV LIV TRUST II 2611 CENTRAL AVE BALDWIN, NY 11510---3634 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1100-202 ILICETO, GREGG & HOPE 115 BURTON AVE STATEN ISLAND, NY 10309---3549 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 800-302 IONESCU, CALIN & MAGDALENA 19 INTERMEZZO DRIVE WOODBRIDGE L4H 3L1 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 400-205 J & J ARNOLDINK LLC 393 TROON CT HOLLAND, MI 43423---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 600-303 J & J ARNOLDINK LLC 393 TROON CT HOLLAND, MI 49423---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM PGD D-11 JACQUELINE SCARPETTI REV TRUST 16 SAGAMORE ST MANCHESTER, NH 03104---3546 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1000-301 JAMES J JABLONDKI REV TRUST 9301 LAS RAMBLAS COURT UNIT F PARKER, CO 80134---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 400-107 JEISENSTEIN REVOCABLE TRUST PO BOX 991071 NAPLES, FL 34116---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1100-107 JOAN I KELLNER REV TRUST 12860 BRYNWOOD WAY NAPLES, FL 34105---4807 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LOT 53 JOHN C BLOOMHALL REV TRUST 1076 NELSONS WALK NAPLES, FL 34102---0 NAPLES MOTOR CONDOS A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 203 JOHN C BLOOMHALL REV TRUST 10760 NELSONS WALK NAPLES, FL 34102---0 NAPLES MOTOR CONDOS A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 202 JOHNSON, CHRISTINA RENEE 12965 POSITANO CIRCLE 205 NAPLES, FL 34105---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 700-205 KAPLAN, ESHA CHARLES C COSBY 12920 POSITANO CIRCLE #107 NAPLES, FL 34105---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 100-107 KAPOOR, SIRINDER K & DENISE 1140 SUNSET VIEW DR BETHLEHEM, PA 18017---3669 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LOT 42 KEADY, SHEILA A 12935 VIOLINO LN #304 NAPLES, FL 34105---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 700-305 KELLER, JOHN 14550 JUNIPER POINT LN NAPLES, FL 34110---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1300-307 KENSINGTON GOLF & CC INC 2700 PINE RIDGE RD NAPLES, FL 34109---5994 KENSINGTON PARK PHASE THREE B TRACT 7 KENSINGTON PARK MSTR ASSN INC C/O NEWELL PROPERTY MNGMT 5435 JAEGER RD STE 4 NAPLES, FL 34109---5802 KENSINGTON PARK PHASE THREE B TRACT R KERSTING, RICHARD T 26 JEFFREY DRIVE CHESTER, NY 10918---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 300-108 KERSTING, RICHARD T 26 JEFFREY DRIVE CHESTER, NY 10918---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM PGA 433 KIDD, CORBIN & MARGARET 12910 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LN NAPLES, FL 34105---0 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LOT 48 KIMBALL, JULIE ELLIS 28585 CLINTON LANE BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM PGD C-2 KIMBALL, JULIE ELLIS 28585 CLINTON LN BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 500-208 KIMBERLY R MCDONALD TRUST 483 HARBOR COURT SHOREVIEW, MN 55126---1935 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 400-207 KING, HILARY L 1060 29TH STREET SOUTHWEST NAPLES, FL 34117---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 100-206 KLABUNDE, SCOTT L NICHOLAS G KLABUNDE 13751 LUNA DR NAPLES, FL 34109---0 NAPLES MOTOR CONDOS A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 204 KLUMP TR, ROBERT & CYNTHIA 8472 DOLFOR CV BURR RIDGE, IL 60527---6328 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1300-207 KNOTH, STEPHEN & CAROLE 8 CROSSMAN RD CENTERPORT, NY 11721---0 ANDALUCIA LOT 136 KOLANOVIC, ZELJKO NICOLINA ESTHER KOLANOVIC 12955 POSITANO CIR #204 NAPLES, FL 34105---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 500-204 KOLANOVIC, ZELJKO NICOLINA ESTHER KOLANOVIC 12955 POSITANO CIRCLE #204 NAPLES, FL 34105---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM PGD C-4 KOLLAS, CHARLES & CATHERINE J 605 ALEX CT CRANBERRY TOWNSH, PA 16066---7917 ANDALUCIA LOT 125 KONANDREAS, LUCAS & GEORGIA 34 KONANDREAS DR STAMFORD, CT 06903---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 500-107 KONKOLY, LESLIE F & JANE A 5107 BRANDYWINE DRIVE EAGLEVILLE, PA 19403---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 600-107 KOTSOPOULOS, STEVE DON KOTSOPOULOS DAVE KOTSOPOULOS 3524 REBECCA ST OAKVILLE L6L 6X9 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 100-201 KOTSOPOULOS, STEVE THUC VO 175 NORTH SHORE BLVD WEST BURLINGTON L7T 1A2 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 300-101 KROKONDELAS, JOHN 13000 POSITANO CIR #206 NAPLES, FL 34105---4917 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1400-206 KRONCKE, KENNETH 41 INDEPENDENCE WAY MILLER PLACE, NY 11764---2337 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1400-106 KURTYKA, KELLY L JAMES E KURTYKA 13000 POSITANO CIR #204 NAPLES, FL 34105---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1400-204 KURTYKA, KELLY L JAMES E KURTYKA 13000 POSITANO PLACE #204 NAPLES, FL 34105---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM PGA 326 LACZKO, BRIAN J & SUSAN E 12832 BRYNWOOD WAY NAPLES, FL 34105---4807 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LOT 60 LANG, KENNETH & PHYLLIS MARLENE & THED CZAPLA 12965 POSITANO CIR #204 NAPLES, FL 34105---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 700-204 LANG, KENNETH & PHYLLIS THEODORE=& MARLENE CZAPLA 1025 FALLS TERRACE UNION, NJ 07083---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM PGA 118 LE, LILY THUAN 13040 LIVINGSTON RD UNIT 7 NAPLES, FL 34105---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1100-101 LEFEVRE, JOHN F & LISA M 400 DITTMER AVE PUEBLO, CO 81007---0 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LOT 41 LEFKOW, HOLLY 15899 DELAPLATA LN NAPLES, FL 34110---2806 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 400-106 LEHTINEN, DAVID M & KAREN 304 TATTENHALL DR CARY, NC 27518---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1400-307 LIU, QING WANZHONG JIANG 803 MYRTLE TER NAPLES, FL 34103---2814 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LOT 66 LIVINGSTON PRO CENTER LLC 719 HICKORY RD NAPLES, FL 34108---0 NAPLES MOTOR CONDOS A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 102 LIVINGSTON PRO CENTER LLC 719 HICKORY RD NAPLES, FL 34108---0 HIWASSE COMMERCIAL CENTER A LAND CONDOMINIUM LU-2 LIVINGSTON PRO CENTER LLC 719 HICKORY RD NAPLES, FL 34108---0 NAPLES MOTOR CONDOS A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 310 LLEWELLYN FUNDING LLC 328 BOWLINE BEND NAPLES, FL 34103---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM PGA 114 LLORCA, MAIKEL & CRISTINA M 12812 BRYNWOOD WAY NAPLES, FL 34105---0 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LOT 65 LO FORTE, ANTHONY & SHERRY B 1426 PLAZA DE ORO BENICIA, CA 94510---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 700-203 LO FORTE, ANTHONY & SHERRY B 1426 PLAZA DE ORO BENICIA, CA 94510---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM PGD D-12 LOCK UP TAYLOR JV LLC 800 FRONTAGE RD NORTHFIELD, IL 60093---0 HIWASSE COMMERCIAL CENTER A LAND CONDOMINIUM LU-1 POList_500_PL20190000097.xls PL20190000097 500' 5/7/2019 Site: Hamilton Place RPUD 4 LOVE, BRIANNA 12920 POSITANO CIR #205 NAPLES, FL 34105---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 100-205 LUCIUS JR, ROBERT E & CASEY J 1462 SERRANO CIRCLE NAPLES, FL 34105---0 ANDALUCIA LOT 25 LYONS, PAUL J & CYNTHIA A 12894 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LN NAPLES, FL 34105---4803 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LOT 44 M4PC TR LLC 5150 TAMIAMI TRAIL N STE 505 NAPLES, FL 34103---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1100-102 M4PC TR LLC 5150 TAMIAMI TRAIL N STE 505 NAPLES, FL 34103---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM PGA 464 MADDEN, MARK & DENISE 11 MACLEISH DRIVE MORGANVILLE, NJ 07751---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 600-207 MADDEN, MARK & DENISE 11 MACLEISH DRIVE MORGANVILLE, NJ 07751---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM PGA 435 MADDEN, MARK & DENISE 11 MACLEISH DRIVE MORGANVILLE, NJ 07751---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1500-202 MADDEN, MARK & DENISE 11 MACLEISH DRIVE MORGANVILLE, NJ 07751---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 300-102 MADDEN, MARK M & DENISE G 11 MACLEISH DRIVE MORGANVILLE, NJ 00751---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 100-104 MAGID, DENNIS & PATRICIA M 12965 POSITANO CIRCLE #102 NAPLES, FL 34105---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 700-102 MAMICHE AFARA, RIMA 105 NORTONVILLE DRIVE SCARBOROUGH M1T 2G9 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 600-202 MANTZIDIS, GEORGE 1425 SERRANO CIR NAPLES, FL 34105---4952 ANDALUCIA LOT 124 MARCHIONI, LEO F & CAROL A 13000 POSITANO CIR NAPLES, FL 34105---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM PGA 322 MARCHIONI, LEO F & CAROL A 13000 POSITANO CIR #302 NAPLES, FL 34105---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1400-302 MARK E FAVREAU & LILLIAN A FAVREAU TRUST OF 2017 431 CONEJO BLUFF COURT THOUSAND OAKS, CA 91362---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1000-203 MARKOWITZ, CHRISTINE E SETH G MARKOWITZ 1208 PLANTATION CIR STATESBORO, GA 30458---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 400-101 MARSHALL, RALPH & DALIA 12990 POSITANO CIR #302 NAPLES, FL 34105---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM PGD B-7 MARSHALL, RALPH P & DALIA 12990 POSITANO CIR #302 NAPLES, FL 34105---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1300-302 MATHER, JASON 12975 POSITANO CIR #308 NAPLES, FL 34105---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM PGA 133 MATHER, JASON 12975 POSITANO CIR #308 NAPLES, FL 34105---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 900-308 MATHEWS, THOMAS & CHRISTINE 5863 CHARLTON WAY NAPLES, FL 34119---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM PGA 543 MATHEWS, THOMAS & CHRISTINE 5863 CHARLTON WAY NAPLES, FL 34119---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 400-208 MATWEYCHUK, MICHAEL J KAREN D MATWEYCHUK 1811 FLORAL DR WILMINGTON, DE 19810---4525 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM PGA 350 MATWEYCHUK, MICHAEL J KAREN D MATWEYCHUK 1811 FLORAL DR WILMINGTON, DE 19810---4525 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1300-304 MAZAL, LUMIR 22 RUE DE BALLOON 67 STRASBOURG 100 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 500-202 MAZAL, LUMIR 22 RUE DE BALLOON 67 STRASBOURG 100 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM PGA 99 MCCLURE JR, JAMES E BERNADETTE A MCCLURE 116 MUIRFIELD PLACE BEAVER, PA 15009---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 200-104 MCCOLGAN, JIMMY D 11559 TWIN LAKES DR ORLAND PARK, IL 60467---5234 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1200-205 MCKAIG, T NEIL & JOAN 12889 BRYNWOOD WAY NAPLES, FL 34105---4806 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LOT 72 MCKEIL NAPLES MOTOR 101 LLC 5135 FAIRVIEW STREET BURLINGTON L7L 4W8 NAPLES MOTOR CONDOS A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 101 MCKENNEY 2011 REV LIV TRUST PO BOX 460399 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94146---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1100-307 MCKENNEY 2011 REV LIV TRUST PO BOX 460399 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94146---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM PGD A-7 MCKINNEY, WILLIAM E LEE M MCKINNEY ELLEN M MCKINNEY 3945 DEEP PASSAGE WAY NAPLES, FL 34109---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM PGD C-7 MCKINNEY, WILLIAM E & ELLEN M 3945 DEEP PASSAGE WAY NAPLES, FL 34109---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 300-303 MEHLER JR, CHARLES V & JULIE P 1469 SERRANO CIR NAPLES, FL 34105---4952 ANDALUCIA LOT 130 METODIEV, MARTIN M CRISTIANE M MARQUES 1415 PANTHER LN #340 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LOT 59 MIDWEST LEASING GROUP OF IL 10275 HERITAGE BAY BLVD #726 NAPLES, FL 34120---0 NAPLES MOTOR CONDOS A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 201 MIKTUS, MATTHEW J 12960 POSITANO CIR #102 NAPLES, FL 34105---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 600-102 MILDRED D SCHOTT TRUST 361 9TH AVE S NAPLES, FL 34102---6849 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM PGA 523 MILDRED D SCHOTT TRUST 361 9TH AVE S NAPLES, FL 34102---6849 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 700-303 MILDRED D SCHOTT TRUST 361 9TH AVE S NAPLES, FL 34102---6849 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM PGD D-3 MILDRED D SCHOTT TRUST 361 9TH AVE S NAPLES, FL 34102---6849 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 600-204 MILITO, GIANCARLO 1117 MINNIE DRIVE RALEIGH, NC 27603---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM PGD D-5 MILITO, GIANCARLO 175 23RD ST NW NAPLES, FL 34120---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 800-102 MILLER, JANICE 12975 POSITANO CIR APT 101 NAPLES, FL 34105---4907 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 900-101 MINNICK, HEATHER M 12936 VIOLINO LANE #106 NAPLES, FL 34105---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1100-106 MISKEE TR, DAWN M D MISKEE REV TRUST UTD 10/27/6 505 CHASE CT EDGEWATER, NJ 07020---1610 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1300-102 MONGELLUZZO, PAUL A & KATHY 119 EXETER RD MASSAPEQUA, NY 11758---8126 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1400-102 MORGAN, MONICA 13010 POSITANO CIRCLE #207 NAPLES, FL 34105---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1500-207 MORGAN, MONICA 13010 POSITANO CIRCLE #207 NAPLES, FL 34105---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM PGD A-12 MOUDY, ANDY E NANCY E BRONSTEIN 2360 PACIFIC VIEW CT SAN LEANDRO, CA 94579---2798 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM PGA 101 MOUDY, ANDY E NANCY E BRONSTEIN 2360 PACIFIC VIEW CT SAN LEANDRO, CA 94579---2798 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 500-108 MULLINEUX, KEITH & VALERIE 31 ABBOTTSMEDE CLOSE STRAWBERRY HILL MIDDLESEX TW1 4RL POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 200-208 MULLINEUX, KEITH & VALERIE 31 ABBOTTSMEDE CLOSE STRAWBERRY HILL MIDDLESEX TW1 4RL POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM PGD A-5 MUNRO LIVING TRUST 1324 ANDALUCIA WAY NAPLES, FL 34105---0 ANDALUCIA LOT 35 MUNRO LIVING TRUST 1324 ANDALUCIA WAY NAPLES, FL 34105---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1000-305 MURACO, ANDREW MARCO CHRISTIANO 7679 GREEN VISTA GATE NIAGARA FALLS L2G 5Z3 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 100-203 MURPHY, DALTON 12897 BRYNWOOD WAY NAPLES, FL 34105---0 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LOT 74 NAPLES CAR GARAGE LLC 6930 SANDALWOOD LANE NAPLES, FL 34109---0 NAPLES MOTOR CONDOS A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 106 NARINE, BERNARD A 32 BREYER CT ELKINS PARK, PA 19027---1350 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1300-306 NATAPOW, MARK 1838 MISSION DR NAPLES, FL 34109---7102 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 700-104 NATAPOW, MARK 1838 MISSION DR NAPLES, FL 34109---7102 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM PGA 112 NAVARRO JR, LINWOOD R & LISA P 123 OLD VOLUNTOWN RD GRISWOLD, CT 06351---8847 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 400-307 NAVARRO JR, LINWOOD R & LISA P 123 OLD VOLUNTOWN RD GRISWOLD, CT 06351---8847 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM PGA 541 NEUHAUS, DEBRAH J 930 106TH LN NW APT 15 COON RAPIDS, MN 55433---4311 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1000-102 NEWELL, SAMUEL 13000 POSITANO CIRCLE #303 NAPLES, FL 34105---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1400-303 NEWELL, SAMUEL 13000 POSITANO CIRCLE #303 NAPLES, FL 34105---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM PGD B-8 NICOLETTA, MICHAEL A 8344 LAUREL LAKES BLVD NAPLES, FL 34119---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 600-308 NIGRO, THOMAS & LUCY 360 STEWART AVE APT 1F GARDEN CITY, NY 11530---4500 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 700-208 NISHANIAN, JOSEPH P VICTORIA D NISHANIAN 1493 SERRANO CIRCLE NAPLES, FL 34105---4952 ANDALUCIA LOT 135 NOWAKOWSKI, ALOJZY & BARBARA 3569 SOUTH BLVD AUBURN HILLS, MI 48326---3852 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1100-306 OLIVER, CHADWICK J & LORI M 12870 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LN NAPLES, FL 34105---0 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LOT 38 OLIVOS JR, ALFONSO ALFONSO J & INES OLIVOS SR 2111 ISLA DE PALMA CIR NAPLES, FL 34119---3407 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1300-107 OLZESKE, MICHAEL A & KAREN J 2266 7TH ST CUMBERLAND, WI 54829---0 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LOT 40 OMALLEY TR, SYLVIA R SYLVIA R O'MALLEY TRUST 12935 VIOLINO LN APT 108 NAPLES, FL 34105---4924 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1200-108 PACKAGE 2017 SVS LLC 2055 TRADE CENTER WAY NAPLES, FL 34109---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 500-205 PALMER, CAROL ANN 12960 POSITANO CIR APT 108 NAPLES, FL 34105---4898 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 600-108 PALMLEAF LLC 9945 ELSINORE COURT PLAIN CITY, OH 43064---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 700-304 PALUMBO, JOHN 1434 SERRANO CIR NAPLES, FL 34105---0 ANDALUCIA LOT 18 PARLATORE, SALVATORE 6898 ST MICHAEL AVE NIAGARA FALLS L2H 3N8 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1500-302 PARSON, RICKIE A 12920 POSITANO CIR #301 NAPLES, FL 34105---4905 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 800-205 PARTOZA EST, REYNOLD 2179 KWINTER RD OAKVILLE L6M 0G1 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 400-303 PARTOZA, REYNALDO S BENEDICTA C PARTOZA 20207 BLACK TREE LANE ESTERO, FL 33928---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1100-302 PARTOZA, REYNALDO S BENEDICTA C PARTOZA 20207 BLACK TREE LN ESTERO, FL 33928---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM PGA 462 PASTRELLO, JOSE & ISABELLE 12816 BRYNWOOD WAY NAPLES, FL 34105---4807 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LOT 64 PAUSYL CORPORATIONAL FL CORP 15899 DELAPLATA LN NAPLES, FL 34110---2806 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 400-206 PAYNE, LOLA 6321 W DEMPSTER #301 MORTON GROVE, IL 60053---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM PGD B-3 PAYNE, LOLA 6321 W DEMPSTER #301 MORTON GROVE, IL 60053---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1200-302 PEARSON, STEVEN F & GEORGIA L 419 N HANNAH MOUNT MORRIS, IL 61054---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 900-108 PEGRAM, ERRIC & MICHELLE 1485 SERRANO CIR NAPLES, FL 34105---0 ANDALUCIA LOT 133 PEPPLE, MICHAEL CARLY PEPPLE 12940 POSITANO CIR #307 NAPLES, FL 34105---4891 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 300-307 PEPPLE, MICHAEL CARLY STRATTON 12940 POSITANO CIRCLE UNIT 307 NAPLES, FL 34105---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM PGD A-9 PERCHERON LAND CORP 3894 MANNIX DR STE 208 NAPLES, FL 34114---5405 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 800-107 PEREZ-CUEVAS, MARIA DE LOURDES 12990 POSITANO CIRCLE #308 NAPLES, FL 34105---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM PGA 354 PEREZ-CUEVAS, MARIA DE LOURDES 12990 POSITANO CIRCLE #308 NAPLES, FL 34105---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1300-308 PERRONE, JOSEPH & CINDY 368 HILLTOP RD TOMS RIVER, NJ 08753---4271 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1500-303 PETRILLO, DOMENICA 12935 VIOLINO LANE #201 NAPLES, FL 34105---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1200-201 PETROVIC, GORAN 36 LAURENTIAN LANE ORILLIA L3V 7N8 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1200-206 PHILIPONE, FRANK P & DEBORAH E 1473 SERRANO CIR NAPLES, FL 34105---4952 ANDALUCIA LOT 131 PICCOLA, KEVIN M & TAMMY A 1665 SERRANO CIR NAPLES, FL 34105---0 ANDALUCIA LOT 30 PIESZAK, CHRISTOPHER ELIZABETH PIESZAK 12872 BRYNWOOD WAY NAPLES, FL 34105---4807 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LOT 50 PIGNATELLI, TONY MARNIE BUYERS 2261 GROUSE LANE OAKVILLE L6M 3Z8 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 900-106 PITTELLI, EUGENE & MARIANNE 45 DRAW BRIDGE DR MONROE TOWNSHIP, NJ 08831---7946 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1200-301 POLAK, JURAJ & JANA 1437 CYPRESS AVE WINDSOR N8P 0C9 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 900-202 POORE, EDMUND H & BETTY 7025 NIGHTHAWK DR NAPLES, FL 34105---4831 18 49 26 E 264FT OF W 528FT OF S1/2 OF S1/2 OF SW1/4 OF NW1/4 2 AC OR 543 PG 76 PORTARO, FRANK J & JEAN S 180 MIDDLESEX AVE PISCATAWAY, NJ 08854---0 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LOT 47 POList_500_PL20190000097.xls PL20190000097 500' 5/7/2019 Site: Hamilton Place RPUD 5 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES MASTER ASSOCIATION INC 12910 POSITANO CIR NAPLES, FL 34105---4830 18 49 26 N1/2 OF NW1/4 OF SW1/4 & ADDITIONAL SLIVER OF LAND DESC IN OR 3455 PG 58,LESS THAT PORTION NKA POSITANO POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I CONDO ASSN INC % PECK AND PECK PA 5200 TAMIAMI TRL N #101 NAPLES, FL 34103---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 200-108 PRESERVE 7965 LLC 562 BLUEBERRY LN FRANKLIN LAKES, NJ 07417---2315 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1500-203 PRICE, RICHARD J & EILEEN M 441 SANTALUZ PATH AUSTIN, TX 78732---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 200-204 PRICOIU, VIRGIL & IONA 4 CASTLEDENE CRESCENT SCARBOROUGH M1T 1S1 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 500-301 QUANTEL INTERNATIONAL LIMITED 165 AVENUE ROAD #400 TORONTO M5R 3S4 NAPLES MOTOR CONDOS A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 104 QUANTEL INTERNATIONAL LIMITED 165 AVENUE ROAD #400 TORONTO M5R 3S4 NAPLES MOTOR CONDOS A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 103 RADCLIFF, RUSSEL K & APRIL S 12852 BRYNWOOD WAY NAPLES, FL 34105---4807 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LOT 55 RAJABI, PIROOZ & SHOLEH 217 DOUGLAS ROAD RICHMOND HILL L4E 3H5 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1300-208 RAJABI, PIROOZ & SHOLEH 217 DOUGLAS ROAD RICHMOND HILL L4E 3H5 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM PGD B-4 RALSTON, STEPHEN 566 BEGIER AVE SAN LEANDRO, CA 94577---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 700-206 RASETA, GEORGE G & SANDRA M 1478 SERRANO CIR NAPLES, FL 34105---4951 ANDALUCIA LOT 29 RATEACA, HARALAMBIE & MARIANA 661 NAPA VALLEY WOODBRIDGE L4H 2J1 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 800-206 RATLIFF, PAT MARSHALL KATHRYN ANN CAMERON COULLS 52 TAITS GAP LOOP ONEONTA, AL 35121---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1500-107 RAY, HEATHER R RONALD J RIGNEY II 614 45TH ST DES MOINES, IA 50312---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 500-305 REDDING, SEAN ASHLEY REDDING 1494 SERRANO CIRCLE NAPLES, FL 34105---0 ANDALUCIA LOT 33 REFERENCE ONLY HIWASSE COMMERCIAL CENTER A LAND CONDOMINIUM 13 49 25 PORTION OF E1/2 SEC 13 DESC AS FOLL: COMM NE CNR SEC 13, S00DEGE 1319.79FT,N89DEGW 120.01FT TO POB, REFERENCE ONLY HIWASSE COMMERCIAL CENTER A LAND CONDOMINIUM 13 49 25 A PORTION OF THE E1/2 OF SEC 13 AS DESC IN OR 5482 PG 3468 NKA HIWASSE COMMERCIAL CENTER A LAND REFERENCE ONLY NAPLES MOTOR CONDOS A CONDOMINIUM 13 49 25 A PORTION OF E1/2 SEC 13 ALSO BEING A PORTION OF HIWASSE COMMERCIAL CENTER LAND CONDO, LAND UNIT 2, ALL REFERENCE ONLY POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM 18 49 26 THAT PORTION OF SEC 18 NKA POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I CONDO AS DESC IN OR 3964 PG 2182 (BLDG 100, 200, REFERENCE ONLY POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM 18 49 26 THAT PORTION OF SEC 18 NKA POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II CONDO AS DESC IN OR 3978 PG 2285 (BLDGS 1000, 1100 REFERENCE ONLY POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM 18 49 26 THAT PORTION OF SEC 18 NKA POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III AS DESC IN OR 3999 PG 3731 (BLDGS 600, 700, 800, REFERENCE ONLY POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM 18 49 26 THAT PORTION OF SEC 18 NKA POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV AS DESC IN OR 4014 PG 546 (BLDGS 300, 400, 500, REICHERT ROTH FAMILY TRUST 26W280 TUCKAWAY CT WINFIELD, IL 60190---0 ANDALUCIA LOT 134 RENDA, CARL ROXANA PECHERO STEPHEN SANDER 12920 POSITANO CIR APT 303 NAPLES, FL 34105---4832 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 100-303 RENDA, CARL ROXANA PECHERO STEPHEN SANDER 3730 MONTREUX LN APT 201 NAPLES, FL 34114---6478 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 700-302 RENDA, CARL ROXANA PECHERO STEPHEN SANDER 3730 MONTREUX LN APT 201 NAPLES, FL 34114---6478 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM PGD C-9 RENDA, CARL ROXANNA PECHERO STEPHEN SANDER 3730 MONTREUX LN APT 201 NAPLES, FL 34114---6478 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 500-101 REVOCABLE TRUST RANDY G KOCH 1721 OAKLAND RD MINNETONKA, MN 55305---0 NAPLES MOTOR CONDOS A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 205 RIBBEL, BRUCE KEVIN CHRISTINA M RIBBEL 1506 SERRANO CIR NAPLES, FL 34105---0 ANDALUCIA LOT 36 RICCI, MARIO SALVATRICE CREASOR 144 ADRIAN CRES MARKHAM L3P 7B3 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1300-108 RICCI, MARIO SALVATRICE CREASOR 144 ADRIAN CREZ MARKHAM L3P 7B3 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM PGA 352 RINE, MARK S DEBORAH A MOSHOLDER PO BOX 427 TALLMADGE, OH 44278---427 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1300-206 ROBERTS III, DONALD HENRY 12980 POSITANO CIR #202 NAPLES, FL 34105---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1000-202 ROBERTS III, DONALD HENRY 12980 POSITANO CIRCLE #202 NAPLES, FL 34105---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM PGA 486 ROBERTSON, WILLIAM N & JOYCE C 15200 CEDARWOOD LANE #B-205 NAPLES, FL 34110---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 500-307 ROBINSON, TODD D 1070 GROVE DRIVE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1100-207 ROCCA, PAT & CHERYL D 94 SECOND ST ROTHESAY E2H 1M5 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LOT 73 RODRIGUEZ, WILFREDO A 13000 POSITANO CIRCLE NAPLES, FL 34105---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1400-208 RODWICK, WILLIAM & ELLEN 106 JUDE DRIVE PITTSBURGH, PA 15237---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM PGA 330 RODWICK, WILLIAM ROBERT ELLEN ANNE RODWICK 106 JUDE DRIVE PITTSBURGH, PA 15237---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1400-308 ROMAN, HENRY MIYOUNG CHUNG 1407 SW 21ST CT FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33315---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 100-304 ROOF, ROBERT H 12868 BRYNWOOD WAY NAPLES, FL 34105---4807 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LOT 51 ROSS, CAROLINE 1301 BENNETT PL HOLLAND, PA 18966---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1500-206 ROYAL, RICHARD & LYNN 5819 PERSIMMON WAY NAPLES, FL 34110---2321 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1000-106 RPCR REALTY I LLC 12920 POSITANO CIR APT 308 NAPLES, FL 34105---4832 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 100-308 RPCR REALTY I LLC 1580 31ST STREET SW NAPLES, FL 34117---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM PGD D-6 RPCR REALTY I LLC 3730 MONTREUX LANE #201 NAPLES, FL 34114---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM PGD D-4 RPCR REALTY I LLC 3730 MONTREUX LN APT 201 NAPLES, FL 34114---6478 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1400-301 RPCR REALTY I LLC 3730 MONTREUX LN APT 201 NAPLES, FL 34114---6478 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 900-203 RPCR REALTY I LLC 3730 MONTREUX LN APT 201 NAPLES, FL 34114---6478 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 800-101 RPCR REALTY I LLC 3730 MONTREUX LN APT 201 NAPLES, FL 34114---6478 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1500-305 RPCR REALTY I LLC 3730 MONTREUX LN APT 201 NAPLES, FL 34114---6478 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 600-208 RUMLEY, JEFFREY P & MICHELLE M 12858 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LN NAPLES, FL 34105---0 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LOT 35 RUSHING, ROBERTA R 41 OLD SPRUCE LANE LEVITTOWN, PA 19055---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM PGA 511 RUSHING, ROBERTA R 41 OLD SPRUCE LANE LEVITTOWN, PA 19055---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 800-308 RUSSO, CHRISTINE 5 QUAIL RUN HILTON, NY 14468---9335 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM PGA 129 RUSSO, CHRISTINE 5 QUAIL RUN HILTON, NY 14468---9335 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 900-102 RUSSO, MICHAEL J 5 QUAIL RUN HILTON, NY 14468---9335 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1300-301 RUSSO, STEVEN J 201 WESTERVELT PL ORADELL, NJ 07649---2542 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 100-305 SALAMONE, SALVATORE & LUCIA 166 BLACKWOOD LANE STAMFORD, CT 06903---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 600-201 SALAMONE, SALVATORE & LUCIA 166 BLACKWOOD LANE STAMFORD, CT 06903---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM PGA 525 SAN SALVATORE LLC 4903 RUSTIC OAKS CIR NAPLES, FL 34105---4522 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM PGD B-1 SAN SALVATORE LLC 4903 RUSTIC OAKS CIR NAPLES, FL 34105---4522 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1100-308 SANCHEZ, LUIS & RAMONA 260 SAINT JAMES WAY NAPLES, FL 34104---6714 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 900-107 SANTOS, MARIA L 2316 ANDREW DR NAPLES, FL 34112---0 18 49 26 E 264FT OF W 792FT OF S1/2 OF S1/2 OF SW1/4 OF NW1/4 2 AC OR 1449 PG 231 SANTOS, MARIA LEONOR 2316 ANDREW DR NAPLES, FL 34112---0 18 49 26 E 264FT OF W 1056FT OF S1/2 OF S1/2 OF SW1/4 OF NW1/4 2 AC OR 1244 PG 1779 SCARAVALLE, GIUSEPPE & RENEE C 13538 TALLGRASS TRAIL ORLAND PARK, IL 60462---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1300-204 SCARAVALLE, GIUSEPPE & RENEE C 13538 TALLGRASS TRAIL ORLAND PARK, IL 60462---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM PGD B-11 SCARPETTI, KENNETH 16 SAGAMORE ST MANCHESTER, NH 03104---3546 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM PGA 492 SCHOTT, ANDREW P & JANET LEA 12950 POSITANO CIR APT 204 NAPLES, FL 34105---4890 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 400-204 SCHOTT, ANDREW P & JANET LEA 12950 POSITANO CIR APT 204 NAPLES, FL 34105---4890 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM PGD C-3 SCHREIBER, WILLIAM JASON SCHREIBER 12965 POSITANO CIR #106 NAPLES, FL 34105---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 700-106 SEDGELEY, JOHN R & SUSAN C 4 BLUE FOX CT LITTLETON, CO 80127---2633 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 600-205 SHANE LIVING TRUST 5827 NW 120TH AVENUE CORAL SPRINGS, FL 33076---4035 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 300-301 SIEGEL, JAMES PAMELA SIEGEL 3230 28TH AVE SE NAPLES, FL 34117---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM PGD C-6 SIEGEL, JAMES & PAMELA 3230 28TH AVE SE NAPLES, FL 34117---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 300-201 SIEGEL, JOHN H & MARY E 443-21 DOE TRAIL AURORA, OH 44202---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 200-303 SIEGEL, JOHN H & MARY E 443-21 DOE TRAIL AURORA, OH 44202---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM PGA 390 SIMS, CORY DEREK CAROLINA ISABELA SIMS 1516 ZENITH WAY WESTON, FL 33327---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 800-108 SIMS, CORY DEREK CAROLINA ISABELA SIMS 1516 ZENITH WAY WESTON, FL 33327---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM PGA 513 SINGH, ABHAY & ANURADHA 5 HAWTHORNE VILLAGE RD NASHUA, NH 03062---2262 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1200-303 SINGH, ABHAY & ANURADHA 801 SHANUDEEP,10 ALTAMOUNT RD MUMBAI 400026 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM PGA 367 SPA REAL ESTATE LLC 5242 KENSINGTON HIGH ST NAPLES, FL 34105---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1500-205 SPAGNUOLO, LUIGI & KIM M 11 PROVIDENCE ST STATEN ISLAND, NY 10304---4306 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1500-102 SPOTO, JOHN M & CHERYL A 627 FALCON CREST DR ROCHESTER, NY 14625---1007 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1200-107 STEPHANS, DEBRA ANAIS KRADJIAN 4 BAYBERRY DR MONTVALE, NJ 07645---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 600-304 STEWART-BUTLER, SONIA E 12990 POSITANO CIRCLE #305 NAPLES, FL 34105---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1300-305 STOICA, MARIN & MARIA 9 RICHWOOD ST TORONTO M9N 3Y8 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 200-205 SUSCA, MARIA 66 DOLMAN ST BRESLAU N0B 1M0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 900-207 SVARE REVOCABLE TRUST 3039 HORIZON LN #2104 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 300-306 SYLVIA R OMALLEY TRUST 402 ASHBURY LN LEMONT, IL 60439---8418 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM PGA 365 TADAS ZUKAS REV TRUST 12975 POSITANO CIR APT 204 NAPLES, FL 34105---4907 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM PGA 135 TADAS ZUKAS REV TRUST 12975 POSITANO CIR APT 204 NAPLES, FL 34105---4907 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM PGA 137 TADAS ZUKAS REV TRUST 12975 POSITANO CIRCLE #204 NAPLES, FL 34105---4907 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 900-204 TARNOWICZ, MARCIN MICHAL 5237 TREETOPS DR NAPLES, FL 34113---8510 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM PGA 346 TARNOWICZ, MARCIN MICHAL 5237 TREETOPS DR NAPLES, FL 34113---8510 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1300-201 THEDFORD, JOHN & MARIA 12905 BRYNWOOD WAY NAPLES, FL 34105---0 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LOT 76 TJ PROPERTY INC 1020 CORNWALLIS LANE MUNSTER, NJ 46321---0 NAPLES MOTOR CONDOS A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 305 TJ PROPERTY INC 1020 CORNWALLIS LANE MUNSTER, NJ 46321---0 NAPLES MOTOR CONDOS A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 304 TORO LOPEZ, JUAN A 12935 VIOLINO LN #306 NAPLES, FL 34105---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1200-306 TRAINA, LOUIS J 1498 SERRANO CIRCLE NAPLES, FL 34105---0 ANDALUCIA LOT 34 TRAVERSA ET AL, ANNA 64 MARSHALL AVE LYNBROOK, NY 11563---1334 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 100-207 TRIVISONNO, NICOLA TIZIANA A TRIVISONNO 207 VALERIA BLVD WOODBRIDGE L4L 6W4 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1300-202 TURNER, DANA 12930 POSITANO CIR #302 NAPLES, FL 34105---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM PGA 396 TURNER, DANA 12930 POSITANO CIR #302 NAPLES, FL 34105---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 200-302 TWENTE, BRYAN M & KRISTINE L 1470 SERRANO CIR NAPLES, FL 34105---4951 ANDALUCIA LOT 27 POList_500_PL20190000097.xls PL20190000097 500' 5/7/2019 Site: Hamilton Place RPUD 6 URBANCIC, GREGORY L & JILL S 12881 BRYNWOOD WAY NAPLES, FL 34105---4806 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LOT 70 USKUP, SEZGIN 1300 ST MARYS ST #209 RALEIGH, NC 27605---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM PGD B-2 USKUP, SEZGIN 1300 ST MARYS ST #209 RALEIGH, NC 27605---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1100-204 VAN BEVEREN, RONALD & YVONNE 12001 S VAN BEVEREN DR ALSIP, IL 60803---1746 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 700-108 VANBUSKIRK, TODD 12975 POSITANO CIR #206 NAPLES, FL 34105---4907 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 900-206 VARCOE, JAY 8475 E WETHERSFIELD RD SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1400-107 VASILE, SEBASTIANE MAGDALENA MARA VASILE 111 AVDELL AVE WOODBRIDGE L4H 1H3 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 700-207 VASQUEZ, CARMEN ISBELY 12909 BRYNWOOD WAY NAPLES, FL 34109---0 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LOT 77 VAZQUEZ, JOSE & YOLANDA 42 ROBIN HOOD RD MORRIS PLAINS, NJ 07950---3062 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1200-307 VELLA, DONALD J 12970 POSITANO CIR #204 NAPLES, FL 34105---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 800-204 VERNON, COURTNEY L 12950 POSITANO PLACE CIR #301 NAPLES, FL 34105---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 400-301 VO, THUC THAO LE 2406 WOODCREST DRIVE OAKVILLE L6M 4S1 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 800-201 VO, THUC THAO LE 2406 WOODCREST DRIVE OAKVILLE L6M 4S1 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1300-101 VO, THUE 2406 WOODCREST DR OAKVILLE L6M 4S1 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 700-107 VOLLMER, JON PETER 12935 VIOLINO LANE #304 NAPLES, FL 34105---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 200-308 VOLLMER, JON PETER SHEILA ANN KEADY 12935 VIOLINO LANE #304 NAPLES, FL 34105---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1200-304 VOLLMER, RONALD LEE 1449 TARA LANE CHELSEA, MI 48118---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 500-106 WADE E GROSZ REV LIV TRUST 6775 MCVEY BLVD COLUMBUS, OH 43235---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 400-102 WALKER, CHRISTY M 13010 POSITANO CIRCLE UNIT 101 NAPLES, FL 34105---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1500-101 WALKER, CHRISTY M 13010 POSITANO CIRCLE UNIT 101 NAPLES, FL 34105---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM PGA 299 WALTON, KEITH MARY CAROL BRENNAN-WALTON 12890 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LN NAPLES, FL 34105---4803 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LOT 43 WALTON, MARIE S LAKE M WALTON II 7432 TREELINE DR NAPLES, FL 34119---9727 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LOT 46 WDTZ LLC 300 BOW LINE BEND NAPLES, FL 34103---0 NAPLES MOTOR CONDOS A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 207 WELLER, CASEY L 12940 POSITANO CIR #304 NAPLES, FL 34105---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 300-304 WELTER, EDWARD P 21027 RIVERBROOK LANE BRISTOL, IL 46507---0 NAPLES MOTOR CONDOS A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 105 WESTCOTT, MICHAEL P EILEEN E BATTHANY 5002 NORTONVILLE CT ANTIOCH, CA 94531---7811 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 500-203 WESTCOTT, MICHAEL P EILEEN E BATTHANY 5002 NORTONVILLE CT ANTIOCH, CA 94531---7811 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 500-303 WHIDDON, ROXANNE 12873 BRYNWOOD WAY NAPLES, FL 34105---0 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LOT 68 WHITE, JULIE M 13010 POSITANO CIR APT 204 NAPLES, FL 34105---4921 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1500-204 WHITNEY, RICHARD N & CAROL S 8929 TURIN HILL CT N DUBLIN, OH 43017---9414 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LOT 37 WILLIAM ANGELO CIAMPO LV TRUST 12920 POSITANO CIRCLE #302 NAPLES, FL 34105---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM PGA 408 WILLIAM ANGELO CIAMPO LV TRUST 12920 POSITANO PLACE #302 NAPLES, FL 34105---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 100-302 WILLIAM J JOHNSON REV TRUST 3991 UPOLO LANE NAPLES, FL 34119---0 NAPLES MOTOR CONDOS A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 301 WILLIAMS, CHRISTINA LOUISE 12980 POSITANO CIRCLE UNIT 306 NAPLES, FL 34105---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1000-306 WILLIS, ROBIN J & WENDY D 12824 BRYNWOOD WAY NAPLES, FL 34105---4807 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LOT 62 WILSON, RICHARD C & CHARMAINE 7732 NELSONS WAY NAPLES, FL 34113---0 NAPLES MOTOR CONDOS A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 206 WINKLE, BRENDAN 99 BEACON HILL DR APT D21 DOBBS FERRY, NY 10522---2443 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 800-303 WINKLE, BRENDAN J 99 BEACON HILL DRIVE APT D21 DOBBS FERRY, NY 10522---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM PGD B-9 WINKLE, BRENDAN J 99 BEACON HILL DRIVE APT D21 DOBBS FERRY, NY 10522---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1200-202 WOODWARD, PETER A & CAROL M 84 MASON LN RR 1 FENELON FALLS K0M 1N0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM PGA 527 WOODWARD, PETER ALAN CAROL MARIE WOODWARD 84 MASON LANE RR1 FENELON FALLS KOM 1NO POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 600-104 YANG DAI PROPERTIES LLC 2910 REGATTA RD NAPLES, FL 34103---0 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LOT 61 YAP-ALVAREZ, MARIA ELBE GARRY ALVAREZ 788 LEICESTER DR NAPLES, FL 34104---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 300-305 YIN, ANDREW WAI CHAN 1514 SERRANO CIR NAPLES, FL 34105---0 ANDALUCIA LOT 38 YON, MICHAEL M MARY A YON JERRY L YON 2042 SWAINSONS RUN NAPLES, FL 34105---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 300-104 YON, MICHAEL M MARY YON JERRY L YON 3067 CLAIR RD LEXINGTON, KY 40502---0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM PGA 439 ZIEMER, MARK L & JULIANA C 35308 UPPER ASPEN LN PINE, CO 80470---0 NAPLES MOTOR CONDOS A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 303 ZIEMER, MARK L & JULIANA C 35308 UPPER ASPEN LN PINE, CO 80470---0 NAPLES MOTOR CONDOS A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 302 ZITANO, NICOLA & CLAUDIA 6849 CALAGUIRO DRIVE NIAGARA FALLS L2J 4L5 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1300-303 ZORAB, THOMAS A J ELIZABETH J ZORAB 152 HEYBURN RD CHADDS FORD, PA 19317---0 ANDALUCIA LOT 138 POList_500_PL20190000097.xls Published DailyNaples, FL 34110 Affidavit of PublicationState of FloridaCounties of Collier and Lee Before the undersigned they serve as the authority, personally appeared Natalie Zollar who on oath says that she serves as Inside Sales Manager of the Naples Daily News, a daily newspaper published at Naples, in Collier County, Florida; distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida; that the attached copy of the advertising was published in said newspaper on dates listed. Affiant further says that the said Naples Daily News is a newspaper published at Na-ples, in said Collier County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Collier County, Florida; distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida, each day and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Naples, in said Collier County, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper.___________________________________________________________Customer Ad Number Copyline P.O.#_____________________________________________________________________________________ Q. GRADY MINOR & ASSOCIATES PA 2280648 Hamilton Place RPUD Pub DatesMay 15, 2019 _______________________________________(Signature of affiant) Sworn to and subscribed before meThis May 15, 2019 _______________________________________(Signature of affiant) 10A z WEDNESDAY, MAY 15, 2019 z NAPLES DAILY NEWS + NOTICE OF NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING Petition PL20190000097, Hamilton Place Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) A Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) hosted by D.Wa yne Arnold, AICP, of Q. Grady Minor and Associates,P.A.,representing To ll Bros., Inc. (Applicants) will be held on: Tu esday, June 4, 2019, 5:30 pm at Naples Church of Christ, 12760 Livingston Rd, Naples, FL 34105 To ll Bros., Inc. has submitted a formal application to Collier County, seeking approval of an insubstantial change to a Planned Unit Development (PUD). The proposed insubstantial change to the Hamilton Place RPUD is being requested in order to add standards for townhouse type dwelling units. The existing RPUD permits multi-family dwelling units and attached single family dwelling units, but did not include development standards that would allow traditional townhouses to be constructed. Exhibit B has been revised to include development standards appropriate for townhouse style dwelling units. The Master Plan remains unchanged from the 2017 approval, Ordinance 2017-02. The subject property (Hamilton Place RPUD) is comprised of 9.75±acres and is located on east of Livingston Road and south of Pine Ridge Road in Section 18,To wnship 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. The Neighborhood Information Meeting is for informational purposes only, it is not a public hearing. Project information is posted online at www.gradyminor.com/planning. If you have questions or comments, they can be directed by mail, phone, fax or e-mail to:sumpenhour@ gradyminor.com, phone 239-947-1144, fax 239-947-0375,Q. Grady Minor and Associates,P.A., 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, Florida 34134. ND-2280648 Dr.Ke lly Malinoski, DPM,FA CFAS Collier Foot & Ankle Care Center Vo ted as a To p Doctor for 2019 from Naples Illustrated -AC CEPTING NEW PATIENTS - Call Fo rAppointment 239.260.5181 Board Certified Foot/Ankle Surgical Specialist/Podiatrist www.podiatristofnaples.com 7955 Airport Pulling Road N.Suite #101, Naples, FL 34109 gi Sp HEEL PA IN? Plantar Fasciitis? Yo u could BE PA IN-FREE in as little as 2 weeks. Ask us about Shockwave Therapy 0.5181239.260 ADVANCES IN BUNION SURGERY Get Back In Yo ur Sneakers in ONE WEEK! NAPLESZOO.O RG yearsasagardenyearsasagarden yearsasazooyearsasazoo CLOSER TO ANIM ALS.CLOSER TO NATURE. CLOSER TO FA MILY. BRINGING GENERATIONSCLOSER. NAPLESZOO.ORG years of school. Soriano-Reyes and oth- er students in the leadership club came in first in several categories over the past four years and last year won first place in national competitions in two categories. In his sophomore year he was ac- cepted to the Guadalupe Center’s Tutor Corps Program, which provides tutor- ing jobs and scholarships to high school seniors. Soriano-Reyes helped kinder- garten through second-grade students at Village Oaks Elementary, where he went to school, with homework, Eng- lish and math. His junior year, he said, he “started hitting it hard.” He took ACT and SAT prep courses, volunteered at the Immokalee library, started taking college courses, con- tinued tutoring through the Guadalupe Center and applied for a career develop- ment program through the Immokalee Foundation. “I started reaching that finish line,” Soriano-Reyes said. His senior year was about applying to colleges and scholarships. “It’s been busy,” he said. Soriano-Reyes said he was accepted to several universities in Florida but de- cided to attend Arcadia because of the partnership between the university and the Guadalupe Center that awarded him a full scholarship. One of his proudest moments was becoming a finalist for the Gates Schol- arship, which is provided by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Then came the email saying he wasn’t chosen. “I was pretty bummed out,” Soriano- Reyes said. Tamzon Hamilton, his Honors Alge- bra I teacher from sophomore year, was just as bummed as he was and said he should have won. “If I ever meet Bill Gates, I’m gonna tell him,” Hamilton said. But Soriano-Reyes still has plenty of accomplishments. He’s the valedictori- an for his class. He will graduate with at least a 3.96 unweighted and 5.42 weighted GPA. Because he did dual en- rollment, he’ll transfer at least 60 col- lege credits to Arcadia. He’s earned enough scholarships to pay for tuition, housing and personal expenses and is waiting to hear back about other schol- arship applications. After such a busy four years, Soria- no-Reyes plans to get as much sleep and family time as possible over the summer. Hamilton said she knew Soriano- Reyes was “off-the-charts” smart early on during her class. She said he didn’t really need her academically and that he could have passed the class without any help. It’s not just his smarts that make him a memorable student, though. “He is the complete package,” Hamil- ton said. “He is empathetic. He genu- inely cares about his fellow class- mates.” Hamilton said she has health prob- lems and that Soriano-Reyes was al- ways the first one to notice, offer her a hug and ask her whether there was any- thing he could do to help her. “He’s just very perceptive of every- thing that’s going on around him,” she said. “He genuinely cares for people.” The people Soriano-Reyes cares about most — his parents and siblings — are the ones he wants to make most proud. He said he’s happy to be a role model to his younger siblings. He’s on track for a life his parents made many sacrifices to give him and his family. Soriano-Reyes’ parents left Oaxaca, Mexico, with his older sister for a better future. They settled in Immokalee and had three other children. Soriano- Reyes’ dad works at a packinghouse. His mom stopped working at the same packinghouse when his little sister was diagnosed with a white blood cell dis- order. He said his parents worked long hours, sometimes from before dawn until 10 p.m., to make a living for their family. Soriano-Reyes spent many nights with an aunt who would take care of him. “It’s sad that I didn’t get to see my parents as much as I wanted to when I was younger, but knowing they were working really hard so that I could be what I want to be when I grow up after graduation …” he said. “Now I get to show them … I’m following my dreams to make you guys happy.” Graduate Continued from Page 3A About Christian What’s your favorite TV show to binge watch on Netflix? “One Day at a Time” What’s your favorite food and favorite place to get it? Gorditas from El Taquito in Immo- kalee What’s your favorite hangout spot? The movies at Gulf Coast Town Center If you could do one thing over, what would it be? Work harder in my classes fresh- man year of high school Describe your senior year of high school in one word Thrilling — knows Florida well (home to the Church of Scientology in Clearwater, of which he’s an advocator). Cruise of course was in the iconic 1980s film “Top Gun,” in which he plays bravado-on-steroids pilot Capt. Pete “Maverick” Mitchell. Earlier in northern Florida, actor and singer Common delivered a com- mencement address at Florida A&M University in late April. Common — who studied business administration at FAMU — addressed graduates of the College of Science and Technology, Col- lege of Social Sciences, Arts and Hu- manities and School of the Environ- ment. Common, who has earned Emmy and Grammy awards, has appeared in films such as “Selma,” “Barbershop,” “John Wick 2,” and “The Hate U Give. Last month, Academy Award-win- ning actor Robert De Niro made reservations for the Titusville restau- rant Pier 220, reserving a corner table. When the actor who made famous lines including “You talkin’ to me?” called ahead, restaurant staff wondered if it really was him. “We were stoked. I love the guy,” Dr. Sachin Shenoy, who owns Pier 220, told Florida Today. “My whole staff was there to make sure he had a good time.” And Naples is hardly ever exempt from brushes with fame, with celebrity sightings in recent years including Har- ry Connick Jr. eating downtown and national championship-winning Clem- son coach Dabo Swinney praising the restaurant Barbatella in February. In March, Tony Bennett visited Parmesan Pete’s in Naples in March, a nd he’s been known to frequent Italian restaurants before in Naples a nd Fort Myers when he’s perform- ing there. Jacqueline DellaRocca, the daughter of the restaurant’s owners Peter and Maria DellaRocca, took the call and let the woman know only outdoor seating would be available. “I was blown away,” DellaRocca told the Naples Daily News. “No one like that has ever called — we haven’t had any celebrities here before. It was so ex- citing.” Other Naples celebrity sightings in recent years include Nicole Kidman (Cruise’s former wife) and her husband, country star Keith Urban, took in a dinner at Sea Salt and watched a “Spi- der-Man” film at a local theater. And in 2015, Aerosmith frontman Steven Tyler shopped at a women’s clothing store in downtown Naples ... for himself, buying a leather jacket and custom-made leather boots. Celebrities Continued from Page 3A Hamilton Place RPUD (PL20190000097) June 4, 2019 Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) Summary June 5, 2019 Page 1 of 2 PL20190000097 06-04-2019 NIM Summary.docx Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134  239-947-1144  engineering@gradyminor.com  www.gradyminor.com The Neighborhood Information Meeting was held on June 4, 2019, 5:30 p.m. at Naples Church of Christ, 12760 Livingston Rd, Naples, FL 34105. Wayne Arnold, representing the applicant, opened the meeting at approximately 5:35 p.m. Eight members of the public were in attendance. Other attendees at the meeting included the applicant, applicant’s representatives, and family members of the property owner. Mr. Arnold introduced Chad Preston and Jim Hepler from Toll Brothers who are the contract purchasers; Kami Corbett, legal counsel for Toll Brothers; and Sharon Umpenhour and Mike Delate from Grady Minor & Associates. Mr. Arnold also introduced Tim Finn, Principal Planner with Collier County Zoning. Mr. Arnold presented a brief PowerPoint presentation to the audience which summarized the applicant’s proposed minor PUD modifications which include adding development standards to permit construction of townhouse style multi-family dwellings, modify the lot area requirement for the amenity area, and add references to the new managing entity for the PUD as required by the County Attorney’s Office. Mr. Arnold mentioned that no changes were being made to the allowable number of dwelling units, or the buffers and preserve areas for the project. The master plan that was previously approved remains unchanged. Mr. Arnold provided a brief explanation of the ownership difference between the townhouse style multi- family dwelling units and the previously approved condominium style units. Mr. Arnold further explained that the change in lot area for the amenity area was due to the requirement to plat lots for each of the dwelling units rather than to be able to use common element area in support of the project amenities. Mr. Arnold provided a conceptual building elevation for the proposed two-story townhouse style units. Mr. Arnold closed his presentation by indicating that this item was scheduled to be heard by the Collier County Hearing Examiner on June 27, 2019. Mr. Arnold asked the audience if there were any questions. Questions from the audience included questions regarding the provided buffer between the project and the existing homes to the north. Mr. Arnold indicated that the required Type B buffer would still be provided and he also again highlighted on the overhead visual that there would also be a water management area and a portion of the project’s preserve that would separate the two projects. One audience member requested clarification regarding the amenity area lot area modification. Mr. Arnold again indicated that the lot area change was driven by the new purchaser’s desire to plat townhouse lots, which reduced the common element area that would have previously been available under the condominium form of development. One attendee asked whether the project had received the Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) and South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) Permits. Mike Delate responded that the property does have both permits, and that an application was pending with SFWMD to revise that permit to reflect the minor modification for the new proposed building footprints. One resident from Brynwood Preserve to the north questioned the location of the project access location and proximity to the deceleration lane serving Brynwood Preserve. Mr. Arnold indicated that the project Hamilton Place RPUD (PL20190000097) June 4, 2019 Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) Summary June 5, 2019 Page 2 of 2 PL20190000097 06-04-2019 NIM Summary.docx Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134  239-947-1144  engineering@gradyminor.com  www.gradyminor.com access location was determined at the time of the original PUD rezoning and that it was determined by Collier County that the access location nearer the northern project boundary for Hamilton Place provided for better access spacing on Livingston Road. One attendee inquired as to the sales price and size of the units. Ms. Corbett indicated that sales prices have not been established at this time, and that the units would be Toll Brothers quality. She directed the audience to view Toll Brothers’ web site to view comparable products. One attendee inquired as to whether there would be common maintenance of the property. Ms. Corbett indicated that there would be a homeowner’s association responsible for all common area maintenance for the community. Mr. Arnold asked for any further questions and comments and with none received, the meeting was adjourned at approximately 5:55 p.m. Petition PL20190000097 (PDI) Hamilton Place RPUD Insubstantial Change to a Planned Unit Development (PUD) June 4, 2019 Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A., 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs FL 34134 (239) 947-1144 www.GradyMinor.com Introduction to Applicant 2 Toll Brothers, Inc. •"America's Luxury Homebuilder®" •Ranked #1 Homebuilder Worldwide on the FORTUNE Magazine "World's Most Admired Companies List" •Specializes in range of products at a variety of price points to meet evolving market trends. Location Map 3 Aerial Photograph 4 Project Information 5 Existing Hamilton Place Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD)Master Plan Proposed Request 6 Minor Modifications to the Existing MPUD •Establish development standards for a maximum of 66 townhome style dwelling units •Modify Amenity Minimum Lot Area •Modify the managing entity for the MPUD to reflect new ownership entity Proposed Request 7 •No additional units are proposed •No new uses are being requested •No increase in transportation impacts •No changes to existing buffering and screening requirements Exhibit B –Development Standards Table STANDARDS SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED VARIABLE LOT LINE FOR SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED MULTI-FAMILY TOWNHOUSE AMENITY CENTER Minimum Lot Area 5,000 SF 4,000 SF 3,500 SF 1 acre 1,600 SF 103,000 SF Minimum Lot Width *3 50 feet 40 feet 35 feet 100 feet 20 feet N/A Minimum Lot Depth 100 feet 100 feet 100 feet 100 feet 80 feet N/A Minimum Front Yard *1,*6 20 feet *2 20 feet *2 20 feet *2 20 feet 20 feet *2 N/A Minimum Side Yard 5 feet 0 -10 feet *4 0 or 5 feet 10 feet 0 or 5 feet N/A Minimum Rear Yard *6 Principal 15 feet 15 feet 15 feet 15 feet 0 feet from LBT or LMT N/A Maximum Height Zoned (not to exceed 2 stories) Actual (not to exceed 2 stories) 30 feet 35 feet 30 feet 35 feet 30 feet 35 feet 30 feet 35 feet 30 feet 35 feet 30 feet 35 feet Minimum Distance Between Principal Structures *5 12 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 5 feet detached 0 feet attached N/A Floor Area Min. (S.F.)1500 SF 1000 SF 1000 SF 1000 SF 1000 SF N/A PUD Boundary 40 feet 40 feet 40 feet 40 feet 40 feet 40 feet Preserve 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet ACCESSORY STRUCTURES Front *2 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet Side 5 feet 0 feet 0 feet 10 feet 0 feet 10 feet Minimum Rear Yard *6 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet N/A PUD Boundary 40 feet 40 feet 40 feet 40 feet 40 feet 40 feet Preserve 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet Minimum Distance Between Structures 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 5 feet detached 0 feet attached 10 feet Maximum Height Zoned (not to exceed 2 stories) Actual (not to exceed 2 stories) 25 feet 30 feet 25 feet 30 feet 25 feet 30 feet 25 feet 30 feet 25 feet 30 feet 25 feet 30 feet 8 Conceptual Building Elevations 9 Questions? 10 Hamilton Place RPUD PL20190000097 June 4 2019 NIM Recording 1 Wayne: Try this, maybe that – better? Okay. You ready, Sharon? Well, good evening, everybody. My name is Wayne Arnold, I’m with Grady Minor Engineering, and we’re here representing Toll Brothers and doing an insubstantial change to a planning and development zoning for a place called Hamilton Place. And it’s located just up the street here, on Livingston Road. Um, with me tonight, I wanted to introduce Kami Corbett, she’s laymen’s council for Toll Brothers. Have a couple Toll Brothers representatives here. Have Chad Preston and Jim Hepler. And this is Sharon Umpenhour, who’s audio taping the meeting for us tonight, and Mike Delate, the civil engineer, working on the design for the project from our office is here as well if you have specific questions. And from the Collier County government, Tim Finn is here. He’s a principal planner, handling the zoning case here. And this is really the developer’s meeting, but Tim’s here if you have a question on the process or something that we can’t answer about the – the process. But, um, none the less, we’re here representing Toll Brothers. A little bit – most of you are probably familiar with the name Toll Brothers, they used to – if you were here a few years ago, WCI Communities was a contract purchaser, and their – their acquisition of this property did not go through. So, Toll Brothers now has it under contract, and we’re making some very minor revisions to the zoning that’s in place in order for them to build the type of product that they desire to build here. But they’ve been a number one homebuilder worldwide. They have a wide range of price points and products, and this product that they hope to build here is a townhouse project. And I’ll talk a little bit more about that. This is an area photograph showing you the property. It’s a little over 10 acres infill piece of property, just near Positano Place and the Brynwood Project. Just a little bit scale so you can see, there’s a home on the property that’s – remains vacant. This is the existing masterplan that was approved a couple of years ago. Uh, it remains unchanged for tonight’s meeting. Toll Brothers will utilize the exact same zoning masterplan. We’ll be making some changes to the development standards table, but the access on Livingston Road has one primary cul-de-sac road that goes in, and on each side of that access road would be a residential product and residential building to the east. Hamilton Place RPUD PL20190000097 June 4 2019 NIM Recording 2 And then farther east, we have the water management system and preserve that separates us from our nearest neighbors to the east and to the north. And that again is the existing masterplan. So, whether or not Toll Brothers did anything with the specific product type or not, that is the masterplan developed that any other builder could pick up today and go build. Where do I need to point that, Sharon? There we go. Sharon: Try pointing it towards there. Wayne: So, [crosstalk – inaudible] the request, we’re really doing three things. We’re establishing a new development standard for a townhome product. And a townhouse is still a multi-family building that’s already approved in this community. However, to distinguish it from what WCI would have done, which is condo-minimize those units, Toll Brothers wants to see those as fee simple units that are attached products. So, the townhouse would allow you to sell fee simple interest in the dirt below the unit, so you have a vertical ownership interest. That’s really the big, significant difference. I think if you looked at the product from an elevation view, to look at it from the street, you wouldn’t know the difference. But in this particular case, we’re establishing standards to let them build that type of product. I will make a minor adjustment to the amenity area size, and that’s primarily because it’s a lot requirement. And since they’re platting lots, we don’t have the same common area to work within when they create those lots that we would have under condominium ownership. And then, we’re making one change at the county attorney request. It’s a new requirement they have to identify the managing entity for the project. So that’s inserting Toll Brothers in lieu of WCI. So those are really the changes. No new units. No new uses, other than clarifying the townhouse development standards. Ah, obviously, there are no new transportation paths, we’re not changing any of the buffers or preserve restraining requirements that are in the project. This is probably hard to read, but the column is highlighted in yellow, establishes the new development standards for townhouses. The other columns are there today, so obviously there’s multi-family just to the left of what says townhouse. And the standards are just different when you have to create small lots and sell those. So, we’re creating lot standards to allow Toll Brothers to put their product type Hamilton Place RPUD PL20190000097 June 4 2019 NIM Recording 3 here and build according to those proposed development standards. The one minor change to the amenity area lots, area requirement goes from 10,000 to 3,000 square feet because of the – the lot configuration that I just mentioned. So, these are conceptual building elevations that we’re working with. We’ve submitted some flat information to the county already, and then the review. So you can see that what we’re proposing are six-unit, seven-unit, nine-unit townhouse buildings. And, Mike, I’m not sure if that’s changed since we started these preliminary elevations. But there’s a – a range of sizes for those buildings and units. But, ah, essentially what they’re proposing are development standards that have a maximum of 35 feet. Those buildings probably don’t top out 35 feet, because they are two-story structures. But that’s the standard that’s already previously been approved, so we retain that same height standard for the project, um. In a nutshell, that’s the very minor changes that we’re making. I’m happy to open it up for any questions anybody might have. And our team’s available to answer any questions you have. We – I should say that this project, the review process, for a complete per zoning review. We’re scheduled for a hearing examiner hearing on June 27th. And that’s a one-day period before the hearing examiner, the process has changed. They don’t use the planning commission and the board for these minor changes to QE’s unless there’s an overwhelming ground of objection to a project. So, this one is hopefully benign enough that it this stays with the hearing examiner in two weeks, and that will be the final approval for the minor development standard changes we have. And that will follow, hopefully, the following month with the board and final plot approval. So, Toll Brothers could break ground on this product in the early fall. That’s the anticipated schedule today. So, with that, any questions from anybody, we’d be happy to field anything have. If everybody could just make sure to speak up. We’re recording this, and the county likes to understand these. If you don’t feel comfortable giving your name, at least make it known that you’re not part of the developer team so they can distinguish that. John: So, my name’s John Vole. I’m a neighbor over at Positano place. Two quick questions. I try to be informed correctly, but what – the one that came out in the mail seemed to indicate that the clubhouse, common area usage was being changed from like 10,000 to 3,000 or Hamilton Place RPUD PL20190000097 June 4 2019 NIM Recording 4 something like that. So, if – if you could talk about that, if that is indeed correct. And then the second one is when this was presented by WCI last time around, there seemed to be pretty extensive, ah, buffering. You’ve got a water management area. You had a lot of shrubs and everything to the north side of the property. But the south side, between the – the development and Positano, didn’t appear to have much. Maybe a very thin line of shrubbery and that was it. And I was wondering if you could comment on the amount of greenery that would be between Positano and the new development. It’s so nice over there with all the tress there now, of course. Wayne: Right. Well, I’ll answer the second question first. And that is that none of the proposed landscape buffers that were previously approved are being proposed to be changed today. So, the same preserve areas, the same buffers that were originally approved for this project will remain. So that does not change. The other question with regards to the lot area change that’s proposed, it’s simply one of – when we were doing this as a condominium project, we didn’t have individual lot lines. So, there would be a common area, where we could locate the amenity area, which in this case, is probably going to be a small bathhouse and a pool. But we don’t need the same area that WCI did to do it. And we have a little bit less space actually when you carve out the lot lines. So, the area that’s remaining – where we put the amenity actually has to fit on a lot. So, we’ve revised that lot area to be consistent with the area that would remain just for that common element. Yes, sir? Male Speaker 1: Did South Florida Water Management and, ah, the Army corps approve the drainage? Wayne: Mike, I’m going to let you answer that. This is Mike Dellick, a civil engineer who’s working on that for our firm. Mike: Yes, the Corps of Engineers has approved the permit. And right now, we’re going through a minor modification with the water management district to change out the building footprint to match. But what Toll Brothers proposes with that will be approved in return. Male Speaker 1: Okay, thank you. Wayne: Thanks, Mike. Any other questions? Don’t be bashful. Yes, ma’am? Hamilton Place RPUD PL20190000097 June 4 2019 NIM Recording 5 Female Speaker 1: Yes. Could you tell me, um, approximately how many units you’re planning on – how many townhomes are you planning on building? And we’re talking about one bedroom? Two bedrooms? Three bedrooms? Wayne: Uh – uh – I – I would have to defer to the unit seismic to somebody from Toll Brothers. Female Speaker 1: Okay, could we... Wayne: But right now, the property’s been approved for 66 units. Female Speaker 1: Sixty-six units. And starting price and...? Wayne: I don’t know anything about starting price. I don’t know, Jim or Tammy, you want to take a crack at that? Kami: Yeah, I’ll take a crack at that. I mean, at this stage, um, we don’t set pricing. So, it could be a range. I mean, if this is early in the zoning stage, a lot of things could change between now and then. Female Speaker 1: I understand. Kami: But, um, they are going to be Toll Brothers standards. You can go on their website at Toll Brothers. You can see the quality of the product that they – they put out. Female Speaker 1: Yes. Wayne: Yes, sir. Brian: Brian Lasco. Brain Lasco, Brynwood Preserve. I live, uh, adjacent to your north border. I’m curious to know what – you talked about, um, border foliage or something. I don’t know the details of that, and I’d love to know more about that. Wayne: Sure. And I may need Mike to help me with some of the details. But if this doesn’t pick up very well, I’ve got the red pointer. So, what’s preserved is this hash area that’s located to the east of the developed tract and also on the north side of our easternmost residential tract here. So is all preserve. This area, all along the northern property line, west of the preserve is part of the water management system and landscape buffer requirements. And that landscape buffer I believe is a type B buffer, which requires it to have trees, a hedge, or a wall, maintained at six feet in height. Hamilton Place RPUD PL20190000097 June 4 2019 NIM Recording 6 And I don’t know the program, if it’s going to be wall or hedge, at this point in time. But the county make us maintain that at a certain level. We have minimum standards for setbacks. I’m not sure how wide that water management system is, but the closest any building can be to the property line [phone ringing] [inaudible -- crosstalk] is 40 feet at the current PUDon the north side. That was part of the discussion, I don’t know when building Brynwood, but that – a couple of years ago was something that we’d dealt with WCI and some of the homeowners in Brynwood as well. Brian: Right. Haven’t been there long enough. Wayne: Okay. [Laughter] Glad you’re here. Thanks for the question. Jim Hepler: We’re sensitive to those concerns as well, sir, just to let you know. So, the buffers will be very good, I promise you that, so. Brian: Excellent. Wayne: Anybody else? No? You sure? Tim, you care to add anything. You know, I’m happy to adjourn the meeting, but I’m happy also to entertain questions, either one. Female Speaker 2: I’m sorry, I didn’t quite fully understand. Wayne: Sure. Female Speaker 2: you said that we’re moving from – the depart is various to change from “multifamily to townhouse as it involves the dirt.” How does that go forward with the base of the entire property? Is everybody responsible for their individual slot? Is there still some sort of commonality? Wayne: I’m sure the Toll Brothers has it set up, so there’s common maintenance on the exterior of most of the project. Kami: Yes. We’ll have a homeowner’s association, and they’ll maintain the common area. Female Speaker 2: And you’ll require a [inaudible – crosstalk] [00:13:06]. Kami: Right. Instead of Condo association – yes, exactly. It’ll be a Hamilton Place RPUD PL20190000097 June 4 2019 NIM Recording 7 homeowner’s association. Female Speaker 2: Another part of that, obviously, and this is – the masterplan’s been approved. I think one of the concerns we had at Brynwood was the – the egress, for [inaudible], better part of the entrance and egress literally pass into our slip lane starts. That’s still the plan for it to be there. Wayne: Yes. The access point is proposed [inaudible – crosstalk]. Female Speaker 2: Which was a double exception for both Positano and Brynwood if I recall, was the line – the distance. Wayne: I wasn’t involved in negotiating the access point. My team might remember, but they had – the county has to provide for access on this parcel. And moving it farther north was better for the access spacing along Livingstone Road than to provide it on the south side of the property. And I think – so that was the negotiated access with the county. Yes, sir? Male Speaker 2: I was hoping you might save us just a little time with the attorney expert and the Toll Brother expert here. If we were to go to the Toll Brother site and look at their quality building products, would we find something that would be closer $350 to $450, or $250 to $350? Not asking about this exact project, but a similar type Toll Brother project. Wayne: That I don’t know. I’d have to defer to Kami or the Toll folks to do that. Kami: I think the majority, and you guys correct me if I’m wrong, the majority of what you see on their site is in the threes. There are some in the twos, but the majority are in the threes, especially in this area. Um, we don’t have anything identical as far as the product, the townhome products that do apples to apples. But you will see our paired villas, and you will see [inaudible] [00:14:45]. But I think that’s generally the range in which you see, is like three, four. Male Speaker 2: Thank you. Jim Hepler: If you go to tollbrothers.com, click on Florida, you can get on the VIP list, and when pricing is finalized, you’ll find out immediately. Male Speaker 2: Thank you. Wayne: All right. Thanks. Anybody else? Going once, twice, adjourned. Hamilton Place RPUD PL20190000097 June 4 2019 NIM Recording 8 Thank you all for coming out. Appreciate you taking the time. COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Revised 3/27/2018 Page 1 of 4 INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO A PUD (PDI) LDC subsection 10.02.13 E & Code of Laws section 2-83 – 2-90 Ch. 3 G.3 of the Administrative Code Pursuant to LDC subsection 10.02.13 E.2, a PUD insubstantial change includes any change that is not considered a substantial or a minor change. A PUD insubstantial change to an approved PUD ordinance shall be based upon an evaluation of LDC subsection 10.02.13 E.1 and shall require the review and approval of the Hearing Examiner. The Hearing Examiner’s approval shall be based on the findings and criteria used for the original application. PETITION NO PROJECT NAME DATE PROCESSED APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Name of Property Owner(s): ______________________________________________________ Name of Applicant if different than owner: __________________________________________ Address: __________________________City: _____________ State: _______ ZIP: __________ Telephone: ____________________ Cell: ____________________ Fax: ___________________ E-Mail Address: ________________________________________________________________ Name of Agent: ________________________________________________________________ Firm: _________________________________________________________________________ Address: ______________________City: _______________ State: _________ ZIP: __________ Telephone: _____________________ Cell: _____________________ Fax: _________________ E-Mail Address: ________________________________________________________________ DETAIL OF REQUEST On a separate sheet, attached to the application, describe the insubstantial change request. Identify how the request does not meet the PUD substantial change criteria established in LDC subsection 10.02.13 E.1. To be completed by staff c/o Dorrill Management Group, Inc.5672 Strand Court, Ste. 1 Attachment C Monterey Master Owners' Association, Inc. Naples FL 34110 ron.santangelo@outlook.com Thomas D. Barber, AICP Agnoli, Barber & Brundage, Inc. 7400 Trail Blvd, Ste. 200 Naples FL 34108 239-597-3111 239-566-2203 tom.barber@abbinc.com COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Revised 3/27/2018 Page 2 of 4 PROPERTY INFORMATION PUD NAME: _______________________ ORDINANCE NUMBER: ________________________ FOLIO NUMBER(S): _____________________________________________________________ Provide a legal (if PUD is recorded) or graphic description of area of amendment (this may be graphically illustrated on Amended PUD Master Plan). If applying for a portion of the PUD, provide a legal description for subject portion. Attach on a separate sheet, a written description of the map or text change. Does amendment comply with the Growth Management Plan? Yes No If no, please explain: _______________________________________________________ Has a public hearing been held on this property within the last year? Yes No If yes, in whose name? _____________________________________________________ Has any portion of the PUD been SOLD and/or DEVELOPED? Are any changes proposed for the area sold and/or developed? Yes No If yes, please describe on an attached separate sheet. Monterey 85-25 & 90-28 80445002007 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Revised 3/27/2018 Page 3 of 4 Pre-Application Meeting and Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: PUD Insubstantial Change Chapter 3 G.3 of the Administrative Code The following Submittal Requirement checklist is to be utilized during the Pre-Application Meeting and at time of application submittal. At final submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with the application packet. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. REQUIREMENTS FOR REVIEW # OF COPIES REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Completed Application (download current form from County website) 1 Pre-Application Meeting notes 1 Project Narrative, including a detailed description of proposed changes and why amendment is necessary 1 Detail of request 1 Current Master Plan & 1 Reduced Copy 1 Revised Master Plan & 1 Reduced Copy 1 Revised Text and any exhibits PUD document with changes crossed through & underlined PUD document as revised with amended Title Page with Ordinance # Warranty Deed Legal Description 1 Boundary survey, if boundary of original PUD is amended If PUD is platted, include plat book pages List identifying Owner & all parties of corporation 1 Affidavit of Authorization, signed & notarized 1 Completed Addressing Checklist 1 Property Ownership Disclosure Form 1 Copy of 8 ½ in. x 11 in. graphic location map of site 1 Electronic copy of all documents and plans *Please advise: The Office of the Hearing Examiner requires all materials to be submitted electronically in PDF format. *If located in Immokalee or seeking affordable housing, include an additional set of each submittal requirement. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS: x Following the completion of the review process by County Review staff, the applicant shall submit all materials electronically to the designated project manager. x Please contact the project manager to confirm the number of additional copies required. ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ 1 1 1 1 1 1 Villages of Monterey Playground (PDI) PL 20180002894 Revised Project Narrative March 26, 2019 7400 Trail Blvd., Suite 200 • Naples, FL 34108 The Villages of Monterey is a residential gated community that was constructed in the 90s and is located on the north side of Orange Blossom Drive. The community is bordered to the west by Calusa Bay, to the east by Emerald Lakes and to the north by Vanderbilt Beach Road. The zoning regulations are set forth by the Monterey PUD, (Ord. 85-25 and Ord. 90-28). The communities’ clubhouse is within the P (Parks) tract as defined by the Master Plan. In 2017, the community made improvements to their clubhouse (PL20160001643) and with those improvements a playground area was added in the northeast corner of the clubhouse parcel. The Villages of Monterey wishes to add a shade structure above the playground, the layout of which is such that the shade structure would encroach upon the 25’ setback. The shade structure will keep the playground equipment cool so that the children in the community can use it throughout the year. Attached within this application is a letter of no objection from the Woodbridge HOA which is in the community directly to the north, the community which will be affected by the change in setback. The PUD does not have specific setbacks for accessory structures in the parks/recreation designation. The HOA board wishes to add the accessory structure setback designation and establish specific set- backs within Tract P for the proposed shade structure, it will also address the existing tennis courts. There is no proposed change in the boundary of the PUD, there will not be an increase in dwelling units, intensity of land or building height. There will not be a decrease in the preservation, recreation or open space areas within the development. This project will not result in an increase of traffic, changes in circulation or other impacts to public facilities. This proposed change will not require any additional stormwater retention or increase stormwater discharge. The proposed shelter will not adversely impact neighboring properties or adjacent land-uses. This proposed change is consistent with the Future Land Use Element and is not part of a DRI. In closing, after reviewing the qualifications of different classifications of PUD changes the original determination that this application is an Insubstantial change is still true based on LDC section 10.01.13.E.2. Thomas D. Barber, AICP Tom Barber 7400 Trail Boulevard, Suite 200 Naples, FL 34108 Telephone: (239) 597-3111 Facsimile: (239) 566-2203 Email: tom.barber@abbinc.com PN 18-0101 Villages of Monterey COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Created 9/28/2017 Page 1 of 3 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DISCLOSURE FORM This is a required form with all land use petitions, except for Appeals and Zoning Verification Letters. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. Please complete the following, use additional sheets if necessary. a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest: Name and Address % of Ownership b. If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each: Name and Address % of Ownership c. If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest: Name and Address % of Ownership Monterey Master Owners' Association, Inc.100 Ron Santangelo, President 0 Lori Marshall, Vice President 0 Amy Kodak, Secretary 0 Derrick Ayers, Treasurer 0 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Created 9/28/2017 Page 2 of 3 d. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and/or limited partners: Name and Address % of Ownership e. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners: Name and Address % of Ownership Date of Contract: ___________ f. If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or officers, if a corporation, partnership, or trust: Name and Address g. Date subject property acquired _______________ Leased: Term of lease ____________ years /months If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following: Words underlined are added; words struck through are deleted. K:\2018\18-0101 The Villages of Monterey Playground\Correspondences\Documents\PDI - Submittal 3\Ordinance 90-28 - REV 4.4.19.docx SECTION V BUFFERS, PARKS, GREENBELTS, ETC., “P” AND LAKES “L” 5.01 PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to set forth the regulations for the areas designated on The Preliminary Conceptual Master Plan, as Buffers, Parks, Greenbelts, Utilities, Etc., and Lakes. 5.02 PERMITTED USES AND STRUCTURE No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land or water uses used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Permitted Principal Uses and Structures 1. Parks, playgrounds, picnic areas, and game courts and fields. 2. Biking, hiking, canoeing and nature trails. 3. Nature preserves and wildlife sanctuaries. 4. Recreational club buildings, shelters and restroom facilities. 5. Water Management Facilities and Lakes. 6. Wildlife Management. 7. Off-street parking areas. 8. Fishing piers and docks. 9. Any other open space activity which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses and which the Planning Services Manager determines to be compatible in the District. B. Permitted Accessory Uses and Structures 1. Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with principal uses permitted in this District. 2. Signs as may be permitted by the Collier County Sign Ordinance in effect at the time permits are requested. 3. Maintenance and storage areas and structures. Words underlined are added; words struck through are deleted. K:\2018\18-0101 The Villages of Monterey Playground\Correspondences\Documents\PDI - Submittal 3\Ordinance 90-28 - REV 4.4.19.docx 5.03 PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT CRITERIA A. Overall site design shall be harmonious in terms of landscaping, enclosure of structures, location of access streets and parking areas and location and treatment of buffer areas. B. Buildings shall be setback a minimum of twenty-five (25) feet from abutting residential districts and the setback area shall be landscaped and maintained to act as a buffer zone. C. Special Setbacks for Tract P Tennis Courts and Playground Shade Structure: 1. East property line - Fifteen (15) feet 2. North property line - Ten (10) feet 3. West property line - Fifteen (15) feet 4. South property line - Fifteen (15) feet C D. Lighting facilities shall be arranged in a manner which will protect roadways and neighboring properties from direct glare or other interference. 5.04 SIGNS AND MINIMUM OFF-STREET PARKING As may be permitted or required by the applicable Collier County Sign Ordinance in effect at the time a permit is requested. MONTEREY MASTER OWNERS ASSOCIATION Board of Directors Meeting June 21, 2018 Minutes The Board of Directors of the Villages of Monterey Master Owners Association held a Regular Board Meeting on June 21, 2018 at 6:30 PM Mr. Santangelo called the meeting to order at 6:40 with the following members present: DIRECTORS PRESENT: Derrick Ayers Bob Bulmer (by phone) Amy Kodak Lori Marshall Bob Murrell Ron Santangelo DIRECTORS ABSENT: Patti Fey Holly Harmon Steve Miller ALSO PRESENT: W. Neil Dorrill, Manager Approval of Minutes of the April 19, 2018 Meeting of the Board were amended to include: Michele Corsarie and Ron Santangelo for credit card signature authority with individual $10,000 limits, a maximum of $25,000 with an authorized signature. The May 17, 2018 Meeting of the Board were approved on motion by Mr. Murrell, seconded by Ms. Marshall. The motion carried unanimously. Report of Officers Treasurer- Cash balance 1.1 million as of May 31, 2018, Capital Resale fee total $25,000. Disbursement noted from Capital Reserves for Athletic Fence, P&L for May on budget YTD and net income of $160,000. Treasurer Report was accepted upon a motion by Mr. Murrell seconded by Mr. Bulmer. The motion was carried unanimously. Security Security concerns involving residents not calling ahead were expressed as this creates delays in processing guests Documents Revisions Mr. Murrell third quote on document rewriting and committee is scheduled to hold first meeting in July New Business ¾ Playground shade redesign to meet set back and clearance requirements that are 25-30 height were discussed and evaluated ongoing. x Options include as noted in presentation x Increase cost to $36,000 (10k over budget) consensus was to seek a variance ¾ Tennis court rehabilitation will move forward to resurface and replace courts, fencing security and furnishing, original budget $50,000 current estimate $75-$77,000. A new $80,000 project budget with reserves a motion by Mr. Ayers seconded by Mr. Murrell. The motion was carried unanimously. ¾ Duck management Ms. Kodak expressed concerns over the health impart of the large exotic duck population and reviewed options from wildlife officials. (A . Catch and release in live removal cost $7,289 B. ongoing contract $1,200 month) On a motion by Mr. Santangelo to do option A. seconded by Ms. Marshall subject to verification of non protected status. The motion was carried unanimously. ¾ Communications project Amy and Bob will perform a preliminary comparison of options and pricing and report back at the end of the summer ¾ Website New design hosting firm is working on a new site that has communications and reservation options with a presentation schedule for August ¾ Capital Resale Net available $25,000 > $22,000 is uncommitted. ¾ Other Neil was asked to explore cost of well for Mission Drive and cost share with effected resident. Additional discussion was received concerning the home at 8137 Ronda Ct. The Board expressed concerns over additional costs necessary to bring the house in a rentable condition. Mr. Dorrill was directed to continue to maintain the exterior landscape for mowing and trimming. The next Board meeting was set for Thursday, July 19, 2018 @ 6:30 PM Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at 8:30 PM PLAYGROUNDSHADE STRUCTURE(40'x60') TURFEX. TURF15' B BUFFER 15' B BUFFER26CASHRUBSCODEQTYBOTANICAL NAMECOMMON NAMECONT.SIZENATIVESPACINGREMARKSCA 26 Clusia rosea Pitch Apple 10 gal. 60" HT. Native 48" o.c. 10 Gal.,4`o.c., 60"Ht, full tobase.PLANT SCHEDULEAGNOLIB A R B E R &BRUNDAGE,INC.NCollier County:7400 Trail Blvd., Suite 200 Naples, FL 34108Phone: (239)597-3111Fax: (239)566-2203Professional Engineers, Planners, Surveyors,& Landscape ArchitectsCertificate of Authorization Nos.LB 3664, EB 3664, and LC26000620ABBRUNDAGE, INC.ARBER &GNOLICollier County:7400 Trail Blvd., Suite 200 Naples, FL 34108Phone: (239)597-3111Fax: (239)566-2203Professional Engineers, Planners, Surveyors,& Landscape ArchitectsCertificate of Authorization Nos.LB 3664, EB 3664, and LC26000620AAAAAABBBBBBBBBBBBBBABBRUNDAGE, INC.ARBER &GNOLI24VILLAGES OF MONTEREYCLIENT NAME:PROJECT NAME:DRAWING TITLE:ACAD FILE NAME:LA-051419ABB PROJECT #17-0064PLOT VIEW \ LAYOUT8.5X11SHEETOFACAD FILE #12031DESIGNED BY: ABBDRAWN BY: ABBCHECKED BY: BCGREVIEWED BY: ABBMONTEREY MASTERS OWNERSASSOCIATION INC.SOUTHWEST PROPERTYMANAGEMENT 1044 CASTELLO DR.STE. 206 NAPLES, FL 34103HOR. SCALE: N.T.S.VERT SCALE: N/ADATE: May 2019LANDSCAPE BUFFER CONCEPTREVISIONSNO.DATEBYALL EXISTINGLANDSCAPETO REMAINALL EXISTINGLANDSCAPETO REMAINHOR. SCALE: N.T.S. 1 PL20180002894, Planned Unit Development Insubstantial Change Villages of Monterey Playground (PDI) Neighborhood Information Meeting Villages of Monterey Clubhouse 1725 Mission Drive, Naples, FL 34109 May 2, 2019 at 6 pm Summary of Meeting The meeting was called to order by Tom Barber of Agnoli, Barber & Brundage, Inc., representing the Monterey Master Owners’ Association, Inc., promptly at 6 pm. He introduced himself and requested that everyone sign in and that all questions be asked at the end of the presentation. A copy of the sign-in sheet is attached as Exhibit 1. Tom Barber began by introducing the project. During his presentation, Tom referred to three large exhibits prepared by Agnoli, Barber & Brundage which were displayed on tables at the front of the room (copies attached as Renderings A, B and C). Tom explained that the purpose of the Planned Unit Development Insubstantial Change is for a shade structure over the playground to decrease the setback on the northern side to allow for that shade structure. Tom explained to the homeowners what a PUD is and stated that Monterey’s PUD was established in 1985, was amended in 1990 and that the PUD placed land restrictions on their property. Tom referred to the large exhibits at the front of the room and the explained that this project is regarding the Parks tract of the PUD. When the original PUD was created, there was a principal structure setback of 25’ but no setback was established for an accessory structure. There were accessory structure setbacks established for single family (15’) and multi-family tracts (10’). The tennis courts are approximately 10’ from the property line now. What is being proposed now is not any closer to the northern boundary than the tennis courts are; the shade structure would be parallel in the same line as the tennis courts. In going through that process, this will clean up the entire Parks tract to allow the tennis courts and the shade structure. This meeting is part of that process in making sure we communicate with the community. A homeowner referred to Rendering B and asked whether a sidewalk was going to put in next to it. Mr. Santangelo (a homeowner) stated that there’s already a walkway there. Tom also informed the homeowners that the shade structure is similar to what you would see at schools and playgrounds. He discussed the fabric, dimensions and removal of the shade structure that was being contemplated. Tom indicated that the structure shown on Rendering B will actually be placed inside of the playground and that there will be additional plantings installed at a later date. 2 Another homeowner brought up the fact that the County denied the last attempt to do this and asked if Tom knew why and whether the County was going to approve it this time. Tom stated that this PDI was submitted to take the extra step with the County because the proposed shade structure is within the current setback. Tom stated that the northern accessory setback will be 10’ and all of the other sides will be 15.’ This will also make the tennis courts compliant with that setback. Another homeowner requested clarification as to the placement of the structure and whether it will go over the swings. It was confirmed that everything but the swings will be under the shade structure. Tom brought up the County requirements for the landscape buffer on the northern boundary and referred to Rendering C. The requirement is to have a 15’ Type B Buffer that would abut the residential. Because we’re within that 15,’ we need to show compensating areas in other spaces that are contiguous to that landscape buffer. So, we’re showing landscaping behind the tennis courts, between the court and shade structure and the area over by the lake. Tom stated that there is vegetation in that area, but we have to prove to the County that it does provide for this, so this is just an extra step. Another homeowner asked whether there would be additional plantings, to which Mr. Santangelo stated there would be additional plantings. A homeowner asked about the proposed access and installation. Mr. Santangelo anticipates that it will come in around the walkway by the playground. No further questions and the meeting was adjourned at 6:10 pm This meeting was audio recorded by Agnoli, Barber & Brundage; a copy of which has been provided to the County. The meeting summary was also prepared by Agnoli, Barber & Brundage. EXHIBIT 1