MPO Agenda 06/14/2019COLLIER COUNTY
Metropolitan Planning Organization
AGENDA
Board of County Commission Chambers
Collier County Government Center
3299 Tamiami Trail East, 3rd Floor
Naples, FL 34112
June 14, 2019
9:00 AM
Councilman Reg A. Buxton, Chair
Councilwoman Elaine Middelstaedt, Esq., Vice-Chair
Commissioner Penny Taylor
Commissioner Andy Solis, Esq.
Commissioner Burt L. Saunders
Commissioner Donna Fiala
Commissioner William L. McDaniel, Jr.
Councilman Erik Brechnitz
Councilman Terry Hutchison
This meeting of the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) is open to the public and citizen input is
encouraged. Any person wishing to speak on any scheduled item may do so upon recognition of the Chairperson.
Any person desiring to have an item placed on the agenda shall make a request in writing with a description and
summary of the item, to the MPO Director or MPO Chairman 14 days prior to the date of the next scheduled
meeting of the MPO. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of this Board will need a record of the
proceedings pertaining thereto, and therefore may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceeding is made,
which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. In accordance with the
Americans with Disabilities Act, any person requiring special accommodations to participate in this meeting
should contact Anne McLaughlin, MPO Executive Director, 72 hours prior to the meeting by calling (239) 252 -
8192. The MPO’s planning process is conducted in accordance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and
Related Statutes. Any person or beneficiary who believes that within the MPO’s planning process they have been
discriminated against because of race, color, religion, sex, age, national origin, disability, or familial status may file
a complaint with the Collier MPO Executive Director, Anne McLaughlin at (239) 252 -8192 or by writing to Ms.
McLaughlin at 2885 South Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104.
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. ROLL CALL
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
4. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA, PREVIOUS MINUTES AND CONSENT ITEMS
4.A. May 10, 2019 MPO Board Meeting Minutes
4.B. Recommendation to approve Amendment 1 to Agreement No. 18-7408, 2045 Long
Range Transportation Plan (LRTP), to Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc.
5. PUBLIC COMMENTS FOR ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA
6. AGENCY UPDATES
6.A. FDOT
6.B. MPO EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
7. COMMITTEE CHAIR REPORTS
7.A. CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE (CAC)
7.A.1. Citizens Advisory Committee Chair Report
7.B. TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE (TAC)
7.B.1. Technical Advisory Committee Chair Report
7.C. BICYCLE PEDESTRIAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE (BPAC)
7.C.1. Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee Chair Report
7.D. CONGESTION MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE (CMC)
7.E. LOCAL COORDINATING BOARD (LCB)
8. REGULAR BOARD ACTION (ROLL CALL REQUIRED)
8.A. Approve Amendment to Fiscal Year 2019 – 2023 Transportation Improvement
Program(TIP)
8.B. Adopt Fiscal Year 2020 – 2024 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)
9. REGULAR BOARD ACTION (NO ROLL CALL)
9.A. Adopt by Resolution 2019 Transportation Regional Incentive Program (TRIP)
Priorities
9.B. Approve 2019 Congestion Management, Highway, Bridge and Transit Priorities
9.C. Approve 2019 Bike-Ped Priorities
9.D. Recommendation to approve the Selection Committee’s ranking and authorize
entering into negotiations with Tindale Oliver for a contract related to Request for
Professional Services (RPS) Number 19-7562, “Collier County Strategic Highway
Safety Plan (SHSP)”
9.E. Adopt Resolution Supporting Naples Pathways Coalition’s Paradise Coast Trail
Vision
10. PRESENTATIONS (MAY REQUIRE BOARD ACTION)
10.A. Joint MPO, FDOT and Local Agency Presentation on Project Programming
10.B. New Policies Regarding Project Prioritization and Programming
10.C. Joint FDOT Presentation on Old US 41 PD&E Study
11. DISTRIBUTION ITEMS
12. MEMBER COMMENTS
13. NEXT MEETING DATE
13.A. Next Meeting Date - September 13, 2019 - 9:00 a.m. Board of County
Commissioners Chambers, 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, FL 34112
14. ADJOURN
06/14/2019
COLLIER COUNTY
Metropolitan Planning Organization
Item Number: 4.A
Item Summary: May 10, 2019 MPO Board Meeting Minutes
Meeting Date: 06/14/2019
Prepared by:
Title: – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Karen Intriago
06/06/2019 7:35 AM
Submitted by:
Title: Executive Director - MPO – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Anne McLaughlin
06/06/2019 7:35 AM
Approved By:
Review:
Metropolitan Planning Organization Brandy Otero MPO Analyst Review Completed 06/06/2019 8:15 AM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin MPO Executive Director Review Completed 06/06/2019 8:29 AM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin Meeting Pending 06/14/2019 9:00 AM
4.A
Packet Pg. 4
COLLIER METROPLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION (MPO) BOARD MEETING
Board of County Commissioner Chambers
3299 E. Tamiami Trail, Naples
9:00 a.m.
May 10, 2019
Meeting Minutes
1. Call to Order
Councilman Buxton called the meeting to order at approximately 9:00 a.m.
2. Roll Call
Ms. Otero called roll and confirmed a quorum was present.
Members Present
Councilman Reg Buxton, City of Naples, Chair
Commissioner William L. McDaniel, Jr., Collier County BCC District 5
Commissioner Donna Fiala, Collier County BCC District 1
Commissioner Andy Solis, Collier County BCC District 2
Commissioner Penny Taylor, Collier County BCC District 4
Councilwoman Elaine Middelstaedt, City of Everglades City, Vice-Chair
Councilman Terry Hutchison, City of Naples
Councilman Erik Brechnitz, City of Marco Island
Commissioner Burt Saunders, Collier County BCC District 3 (Present over teleconference)
Members Absent
None
MPO Staff
Anne McLaughlin, MPO Executive Director
Brandy Otero, MPO Principal Planner
Eric Ortman, MPO Senior Planner
Karen Intriago, MPO Administrative Assistant
FDOT
Wayne Gaither, FDOT
Victoria Peters, FDOT
Secretary LK Nandam, FDOT
Zachary Burch, FDOT
Gwen Pipkin, FDOT
Others Present
Scott Teach, Deputy County Attorney
Michelle Avola, Naples Pathway Coalition (NPC)
Trinity Scott, Collier County Transportation Planning (CCTP)
Lorraine Lantz, Collier County Transportation Planning (CCTP)
Rae Ann Burton, Citizen
Tara Jones, Jacobs Engineering
Bill Gramer, Jacobs Engineering
Pam Brown, Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC) Chair
4.A.a
Packet Pg. 5 Attachment: May 10, 2019 MPO Board Meeting Minutes (9242 : May 10, 2019 MPO Board Meeting Minutes)
3. Pledge of Allegiance
Councilman Hutchison led the Pledge of Allegiance.
Commissioner McDaniel made a motion to allow Commissioner Saunders to participate by telephone due to
exceptional circumstances. Second by Commissioner Fiala. Carried unanimously.
4. Approval of the Agenda, Previous Minutes, and Consent Items
A. Approval of Appointment to the Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (Larry Smith, PE)
B. Approve the Second Amendment to the MPO Lease Agreement and the Amended and Restated Staff
Services Agreement between the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization and the Collier County
Board of County Commissioners
C. April 12, 2019 MPO Board Meeting Minutes
Commissioner Taylor moved to approve the Agenda, Previous Minutes, and Consent Items. Second by
Councilwoman Middelstaedt. Carried unanimously.
5. Public Comments for Items not on the Agenda
Rae Ann Burton - Has a concern with the County-owned land on the Randall curve; whatever is built
there will either enhance or destroy the rural environment. Of the three proposals presented at public
meeting, Shy Wolf Sanctuary received the most votes - 64. What is built in the area must benefit Golden
Gate Estates and not the developers. The money from the sale belongs to GAC Land Trust and all should
be used for the benefit of Golden Gate Estates.
6. Agency Updates
A. FDOT
Ms. Peters – Gave an update on the Trail Blvd. sidewalk project. Final inspection completed; contractor
working with FDOT on punch list items. Lighting final inspection completed. Signalization final inspection
held, punch list generated. FDOT has held a series of meetings with the Lighthouse of Collier - Center for
Blindness and Vision Loss. FDOT has followed up by installing Audible Ped Signals (APS) at a number of
intersections throughout Collier County. Ms. Peters will continue to follow up with local law enforcement
and the Community Traffic Safety Team regarding the Lighthouse’s concerns about red light running.
Commissioner Taylor - What is the progress regarding the red-light running devices and is it an FDOT
issue or is it a legislative issue? Ms. Peters - On this type of matter FDOT partners with law enforcement
on information they receive from local citizens, where these occurrences are identified. Then law
enforcement takes over.
Commissioner Taylor - Requested update on intersection cameras that were removed. Secretary LK
Nandam - FDOT does not manage that program. By statute, cameras can be installed if enforcement
agencies choose to. FDOT has a permit process to follow when placed on state roads.
Councilman Buxton - Requested information on the managed lanes study on I-75. Mr. Burch – FDOT is
studying I-75 Corridor through Lee/Collier Counties, Sarasota/Manatee/Charlotte and I-4/ in Polk County.
Purpose is to investigate future needs of I-75 - capacity needs, adding lanes (up to 8-10). Study will consider
all types of managed lanes, including express lanes, freight lanes, HOV lanes, and regular general use lanes.
Study will review all existing interchanges; determine improvements needed to accommodate more lanes
4.A.a
Packet Pg. 6 Attachment: May 10, 2019 MPO Board Meeting Minutes (9242 : May 10, 2019 MPO Board Meeting Minutes)
or general operation improvements. FDOT has agreed to look at potential new interchanges including one
at Vanderbilt Beach Rd in Collier. Lee/Collier County study will cost about $10 million; take 4-5 years to
complete. $11 million in Sarasota/Manatee and Charlotte and $11 million in Polk County. Data collection
varies from how many people are on the road, where they get on, where they get off, why are the drivers
using it, are they local trips, are they long distance trips, noise, etc. to determine need to expand number of
lanes.. Widening I-75 will cost billions of dollars; this is a long-term project.
Commissioner McDaniel - Total cost of study comes out to $30 million. Secretary LK Nandam - FDOT
selected a consultant to do these studies and is in contract negotiations. An interstate program manager
consultant was hired for the overall program, responsible for creating community and public engagement
plan. Regular updates will be given to MPO. The outcome will include plan geometrics and priority list.
Commissioner McDaniel – Understands process is lengthy and complex, but constituents cannot fathom
the cost. No surprise that costs have risen to $10 million/mile for FDOT to build a road - should be done
differently.
Commissioner Fiala - If it takes five years just to do the study, how is it going to help the building process
if the growth in population is happening so rapidly? How valid the study is when there are other processes
such as bidding that will need to be completed before construction can begin. Secretary LK Nandam -
the study will define what I-75 is going to look like. As funding becomes available, segments will be
tackled in order of priority. If there is a time gap, a minor re-evaluation will be done to make sure the study
is still valid.
Councilman Brechnitz - Designing 100 miles of road and taking four years for just a study is puzzling to
the average citizen. Mr. Burch - The study is very in-depth with many State and Federal rules, guidelines,
and requirements ranging from endangered species, noise, air, etc. It is a complex process, but ensures use
of State and Federal funding to make improvements.
Commissioner McDaniel - MPOs provide the forum for communication for people to express where those
needs are and for prioritization. The people who drive in these areas are the ones who really know the
deficiencies in the system. Mr. Burch – Study has in-depth communications plan involving outreach to
local businesses, residents and government officials. Maintaining the communication and level of
commitment to the residents and elected officials will not only be important to the project but important to
the Department.
B. MPO Executive Director
Ms. McLaughlin - Announced Ms. Brandy Otero as the new Principal Planner for the Collier MPO. Ms.
Otero’s previous position (Senior Planner) was advertised and closed on Thursday. The Naples Pathway
Coalition (NPC) approached Ms. McLaughlin requesting an MPO Board resolution of support for the
Paradise Coast Trail Vision. Checking in with the Board before introducing a draft resolution to the advisory
committees. Will limit resolution’s statement of support to how the NPC vision relates to the recently
adopted Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan (BPMP). The vision is consistent with the SUNTrail network
and the proposed Spine Trail Network in the BPMP. Ms. McLaughlin asked the Board if they are
comfortable with her pursuing this resolution with the committees.
Commissioner McDaniel - Concerned that the map shows a wide path through areas that don’t have roads,
particularly that go out along I-75 and through the middle of Golden Gate Estates, and the wide path along
US 41. Concern is based upon the previous direction and discussions regarding the River of Grass
Greenway issue.
4.A.a
Packet Pg. 7 Attachment: May 10, 2019 MPO Board Meeting Minutes (9242 : May 10, 2019 MPO Board Meeting Minutes)
Commission Saunders – Agreed with Commissioner McDaniel regarding being cautious not to send out
the wrong signal. He supported the resolution.
Councilman Hutchison - Inquired about the new resolution and how it differs. Ms. McLaughlin explained
that it is consistent with BPMP. The proposed study corridor that goes east and north to Immokalee and
would connect Golden Gate Estates, Ave Maria, and Immokalee is included in the BPMP, because it came
out in public meetings as a desired connection. However, how to make these connections has not been
determined and needs to be studied further. Councilman Hutchison - Does staff have a map showing
which portions of the Vision are old and which are new? Ms. McLaughlin - Will bring back a map that
differentiates the existing alignment for the SUNTrail with what is new. The map will be part of the
advisory committee review.
Ms. Avola - NPC hired Kimley-Horn as consultants to make the vision become a reality and put together
a plan. The NPC has worked together with Trinity Scott and the MPO to come up with an off-road multi-
use path system that is in unison with BPMP. She explained how it would improve the area, make safer
commuter transportation for citizens in Immokalee/Ave Maria/ Golden Gate, provide a recreation corridor,
and healthier lifestyle. The wide swath indicated would be the proposed study area. The next step would
be a feasibility study. Being that the trail would be approximately 70 miles long, it would also become a
destination trail. The NPC is exploring all sorts of funding options private and public. The project is still
in the preliminary stages.
Commissioner McDaniel - What luck has NPC had coordinating with FPL? There are enormous
transmission lines crossing the state that are sorely unutilized. Ms. Avola – NPC will work with FPL as
part of the next step however the vision has some very strong connections and NPC will be looking at
utilizing utility corridors and canals.
Councilman Brechnitz – Requested a copy of the first plan and the second plan to better understand what
is proposed.
Commissioner McDaniel – asked that this item be brought back in June. Ms. McLaughlin confirmed,
added that the resolution will be presented to the advisory committees in May and the Board in June.
7. Committee Chair Reports
7.A.1. Citizen Advisory Committee Chair Report
Ms. Brown provided a summary to the Board of the Chair report contained in the packet,
adding that the turn-out of committee members has been very good and discussions very lively.
She has comments on other items on the agenda which she will address at the appropriate time.
7.B.1 Technical Advisory Committee Chair Report
Ms. Lantz provided a summary to the Board of the Chair report contained in the packet, noting
that questions and comments regarding the UPWP and the TIP amendment had been addressed
and expected that would be the case also with the draft TIP in June.
7.C.1. Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) Chair Report
Mr. Ortman read the Chair report contained in the MPO packet to the Board .
7.D.1 Congestion Management Committee Chair Report
7.E.1 Local Coordinating Board (LCB)
Commissioner Fiala provided a summary to the Board based on the Chair report in the packet.
4.A.a
Packet Pg. 8 Attachment: May 10, 2019 MPO Board Meeting Minutes (9242 : May 10, 2019 MPO Board Meeting Minutes)
8. Regular Board Action (Roll Call Required)
A. Approval of Amendment to Fiscal Year 2019 – 2023 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)
Mr. Ortman - FDOT requested an amendment for a project located in Everglades City (Copeland Ave.). It
was requested to better meet the needs of Everglades City and to ensure planning consistency and
authorization of federal funds. The amendment is required because the project limits are being corrected to
go from .2 miles to .93 miles which constitutes a major change. The original project was submitted for Datura
St. and Broadway Ave. and the length was approximately .2 miles. The application changed from
Datura/Broadway to Copeland Ave. The State’s system still showed the project length as .2 miles, so this
amendment will correct that. The TAC asked if the southern limit of the project was correct. Staff researched
and determined that the southern limit of the project was correct as shown. The TAC and CAC unanimously
endorsed the amendment.
Commissioner McDaniel - Requested that staff ensure this project coincide with road improvements
scheduled in the area.
Commissioner Solis made a motion to approve the Amendment to Fiscal Year 2019 – 2023 Transportation
Improvement Program. Second by Councilwoman Middlestaedt. Roll call vote was taken with the motion
passing unanimously.
Commissioner Taylor Yes
Commissioner Solis Yes
Councilwoman Middlestaedt Yes
Councilman Brechnitz Yes
Commissioner McDaniel Yes
Commissioner Fiala Yes
Councilman Buxton Yes
Commissioner Saunders Yes
Councilman Hutchison Yes
9. Regular Board Action (No Roll Call)
A. Approval of Amendment to FY 18/19-19/20 Unified Planning Work Program
Commissioner McDaniel moved to approve the Amendment to the FY2018/19 -2019/20 Unified Planning
Work Program (UPWP). Second by Commissioner Taylor. Carried unanimously.
B. Approval of the Transportation Disadvantaged (TD) Planning Grant Application and Resolution
2019-05
Commissioner Fiala moved to approve the Transportation Disadvantaged (TD) Planning Grant
Application and Resolution 2019-05. Second by Commissioner McDaniel. Carried unanimously.
C. Approve Use of SU “Box” Funds to Cover Cost Over-Run on Financial Project Number 4350131, “ITS
Integrated/Standardized Network Communication.”
4.A.a
Packet Pg. 9 Attachment: May 10, 2019 MPO Board Meeting Minutes (9242 : May 10, 2019 MPO Board Meeting Minutes)
Ms. McLaughlin - Current and more up-to-date cost estimates brought the project in at a higher cost. Funds
are available to cover the additional project cost. By Board policy this item is being brought to the Board
for discussion. The original estimate was $850,000. The project came in at $258,409 over the estimated
cost. If approved, FDOT would use the remainder of the MPO FY19 SU “Box” funds [$37,268] and
$221,141 from FY20 leaving a balance of $505,468. The proposal meets the eligibility criteria - FDOT
recommended this project be considered, and Collier County can meet the deadlines.
Commissioner Taylor moved to approve the use of SU “Box” Funds to Cover Cost Over-Run on Financial
Project Number 4350131, “ITS Integrated/Standardized Network Communication.” Second by
Councilwoman Middlestaedt. Carried unanimously.
D. Approve Joint FDOT-MPO Joint Certification Statement
Ms. McLaughlin - MPO Board approval is needed for the Chair to sign the annual Joint MPO/
FDOT Certification Statement. FDOT has made the determination that Collier MPO’s documentation is in
order and is considered to be low risk. Under noteworthy practices and achievements, staff has expanded
efforts in public engagement and collaboration with partner agencies, examples include collaborating with
the City of Naples and the NPC on the bike tourism map, recently completing the Golden Gate Walkability
Study, and the completion of the new Public Participation Plan and Bicycle Pedestrian Master Plan.
Commissioner Taylor moved to approve the Joint FDOT-MPO Certification Statement. Second by
Councilwoman Middlestaedt. Carried unanimously.
10. Presentations (May Require Board Action)
A. FDOT SR29 Oil Well Rd to SR82 Project Development and Environmental Study (PD&E) Update
Ms. Gwen Pipkin presented the PowerPoint “SR29 Project Development & Environment Study”
highlighting:
A public hearing was held on Nov. 15, 2018 to present the preferred alternative. The
preferred alternative included:
o 4 lane divided highway from north to south
o Reconfigured signalized intersection where 29 meets Westclox and at CR 846
o Adding roundabout at SR 29 and SR 82
o Reconfigured signalized intersection where the new alignment of SR 29 meets
the existing SR 29 north of Westclox Street/New Market Road
o Roundabout at SR 29 and SR 82
64 citizens attended the public hearing.
A petition with over 1,000 signatures requesting a crosswalk at the intersection of
Westclox by the hospital area.
Other comments were received regarding Preferred Alternative, bike / pedestrian
accommodations, support/opposition of roundabout at SR29 and Westclox St, and
impacts for property owners on parcels.
Immediate actions that were taken after the meeting: adjustment of roadway alignment
to avoid impacts to airport park and reviewed pedestrian crossing options for Westclox.
Total costs estimated at $166,736,000.
Traffic operations evaluating interim intersection improvements at SR 29 and
Westclox Street.
On July 18th the SR 82 project from Gator Slough Rd. to SR 29 to add a roundabout
will be let.
4.A.a
Packet Pg. 10 Attachment: May 10, 2019 MPO Board Meeting Minutes (9242 : May 10, 2019 MPO Board Meeting Minutes)
Commissioner McDaniel – What provisions are made for pedestrians crossing at a roundabout? Ms.
Pipkin - Modern roundabouts have an entry that is queued off to the right. There is an entry on the
roundabout that has a crosswalk. Pedestrians only cross one direction at a time. It is a two-phase move
for pedestrians.
Ms. Brown - Pleased with the aggressive action that is being taken regarding Immokalee.
Recommends installing a right merge lane on SR 29 and 82 that goes south into Immokalee and a west
merge lane for SR 82 and SR 29 to alleviate traffic. Agrees with Commissioner McDaniel and does not
feel a roundabout is safe for a heavy commercial traffic at a big intersection. Inquired about an overpass
for better traffic fluidity and asked if it is possible to change at this stage.
Commissioner McDaniel - The project is scheduled to be let on July 18th and the roundabout is part
of the project. He has researched roundabouts and the number of crashes may not go down, but the
number of fatalities is reduced significantly.
Ms. Brown – When will the red light at SR 29 and Westclox be installed? Ms. Pipkin is following
up on that item. The traffic signal is one of the options to address the issues. Ms. Brown would like
to see improvements before season starts again. Commissioner McDaniel is working with the
private sector to help identify funding for the project.
B. Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)
Eric Ortman presented the PowerPoint “FY2020- FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program”
highlighting:
TIP divided into three sections, projects divided into nine different sections
Total funding increased by 24% from $398 M to $493 M
Majority of funding will go to Highway and Maintenance
All Transportation Performance Measures and Targets will be included in TIP with
Consensus Planning Document
Appendix has been added
GIS maps produced, clearer and more accurate than Google Earth
Major Projects include:
o Widening Projects-
SR82: SR29 to Hendry Co Line
SR 29: Oil Well Rd to Hendry Co Line
o Resurfacing Projects-
I-75: Toll Booth to Broward Co: CST FY22
US41: CTS in FY 21,22,23
o Major Interchange Project
I-75 @ SR951; CST FY24
o New Projects and Major Added Phases-
16th St Bridge: New Bridge
I-75@Pine Ridge: PD&E
Airport Rd: Adding Thru Lanes
SR951: Tower Rd to Manatee Rd
Bike/Ped Projects Funded for Construction
4.A.a
Packet Pg. 11 Attachment: May 10, 2019 MPO Board Meeting Minutes (9242 : May 10, 2019 MPO Board Meeting Minutes)
Commissioner McDaniel – There is an item later in the agenda regarding the City of Naples not
pursuing the Beach Access Sidewalk Project, however the project is still in the draft TIP.
Ms. McLaughlin - City of Naples has submitted an official request to remove the project. It takes a
while to go through the FDOT internal process. It is still shown in their Work Program, but an
amendment should be presented sometime in the near future. Ms. Peters explained the project could
not be fully removed due to the money that has been spent on the project. It must stay this year in the
TIP because of the funding spent on the design phase. However next year the construction phase will
be removed. It may not show up as an amendment, but it should not appear in next year’s work
program.
Commissioner McDaniel - Regarding SR29& SR 82, The priority should be put where people are in
fact traveling.
Secretary Nandam - The north segment is part of the work program for construction because it is a
very small segment. The project is less than $9 million. The segment mentioned by Commissioner
McDaniel is still the priority.
Commissioner McDaniel – Projects where people are traveling should be given priority. It is
imperative due to the many fatal accidents that have happened over the years.
Councilman Hutchison - Project 4404371 described as a sidewalk/bike lane project on South Golf
Drive, from Gulf Shore Blvd to US 41(running down south side of Naples Beach Hotel and golf course).
Councilman Hutchison inquired about how that work would correspond with the work being done on
the hotel project. Ms. McLaughlin stated that the MPO staff will check with City of Naples Streets
and Drainage Department staff, agreeing that coordination is needed because of this new development.
Councilman Hutchison - There are 50 to 60 vehicles parked in the right of way on various days. Is
there a plan to limit parking or provide notice that parking is not allowed? Overwhelming number of
vehicles park on that right-of-way close to the beach; need to plan to accommodate that or provide
public notice that parking is not allowed. Water quality is very important to this state, there should be
a reconsideration or alternative to pouring concrete so close to a large body of water. Ms. McLaughlin
will reach out to City of Naples staff and request a presentation since this is going to be a locally-led
project.
Councilman Hutchison - Is any work planned on US 41from Golden Gate Parkway to 5th Ave., such
as infrastructure improvements, road changes, lane diets? Secretary Nandam - There is a
drainage/infrastructure issue on that segment of US41. FDOT is working on identifying funding to
rebuild the drainage on US 41. Currently, FDOT is performing a study taking into account the goals
of the City of Naples and Collier County. A time frame for this project has not yet been identified.
Councilman Hutchinson - Why is the project not in the current Work Program if it is being studied
now and what category of project does this fall under? Secretary Nandam - The study is being done
by in-house design consultants; the type of project cannot be defined until the study is completed.
Councilwoman Middelstaedt - Regarding Part 5 City of Everglades, packet page 328 - Everglades
City has discovered a document that states the County is responsible for the maintenance of 29
(surfacing, signage, striping) and the City’s responsibility is maintenance of landscaping on the median.
There have been 3 nearly fatal accidents on the roadway. The City has been reviewing the issues from
a liability standpoint and has discovered this document. The agreement will be brought to the County
soon. MPO needs to be aware. Mr. Ortman - A CAC member from Everglades City brought this
4.A.a
Packet Pg. 12 Attachment: May 10, 2019 MPO Board Meeting Minutes (9242 : May 10, 2019 MPO Board Meeting Minutes)
issue to attention at CAC meeting. Ms. McLaughlin - The MPO is deferring to Collier County to do
the research. The results can be brought to the MPO.
Commissioner Solis – Asked about the status of the widening of Vanderbilt Beach Road (VBR) east
of Goodlette to 41. Ms. Scott stated that the project is within the 5-year work program and design has
begun.
C. FDOT Statutory Formula Report
Ms. Peters presented and explained the FDOT Statutory Formula Report contained in the packet. Key
points included:
This Statutory Formula Equation is not a true reflection on how the Department
distributes funding; these numbers only represent the funds that the Department is
required to provide 80% on.
Collier County is healthy, looking at total funds
The goal is to reach out and to collaborate with local partners.
D. 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) Kick-off Presentation
Ms. Jones presented the PowerPoint “Envision 2045 Collier MPO Long Range Transportation plan”
highlighting:
Purpose of the 2045 LRTP
2045 LRTP Requirements
Planning Emphasis Areas that must be addressed
Differences with the LRTP compared to the 2040
Opportunity for public input and outreach
2045 LRTP Schedule
2045 LRTP Goals
Ms. Jones asked the Board for their vision related to growth and the future transportation system in
Collier County.
Councilman Hutchison - UBER made its initial public offering. What will be different, in terms of
planning for autonomous vehicles, that will be fundamentally different to accommodate those kinds of
changes? Ms. Jones It is difficult to predict how it will look in the future. There is policy in place that
allows for the testing of autonomous vehicles. It will be a while before anything is implemented on the
roadway network. There are several ongoing studies and as information becomes available, the Board
will be updated. Councilman Hutchison asked if traffic will be mitigated to some extent or will it be
a wash with population growth. Ms. Jones There is a potential for more vehicles in the future.
Secretary Nandam - The industry is still trying to figure out what the change will mean. FDOT has
issued policy direction on how to incorporate the technology into the planning process for the 2045
LRTP. The 2045 LRTP update will not give the clear vision as to what it will look like in the future.
FDOT is focused on testing technology. The real impact will occur at the land-use planning level. With
autonomous vehicle markets working the way they do, the way land use planning is done will be
completely different particularly in determining the number of parking spaces needed. The impact to
traffic infrastructure will also be different. Over the next five to ten years, the land use changes will be
identified, and what the impact of those changes are to the infrastructure will be evaluated.
Councilman Brechnitz – Suggested reviewing studies completed by Tesla and other communities that
have already begun to plan for autonomous vehicles.
4.A.a
Packet Pg. 13 Attachment: May 10, 2019 MPO Board Meeting Minutes (9242 : May 10, 2019 MPO Board Meeting Minutes)
Commissioner McDaniel – LRTP is completed every 5 years. The goal is to adjust the needs with the
circumstances that are currently prevalent as the plan is updated. Tennessee and Louisiana are building
100-mile segments of automated connected vehicle infrastructure now. The studies are showing that
there may be as much as a 30% reduction of cars in the future.
E. Naples Beach Access sidewalk projects No. 4371851
Ms. McLaughlin - Presented an update on the Naples Beach Access sidewalk project. City Council
voted to deny a maintenance agreement for the project and requested the project be terminated. She
wanted to discuss what can be done to try to avoid having projects incur costs and then have the project
dropped for one reason or another. Explained it could be because the project was not scoped properly,
lacked feasibility, community changes, and then projects get dropped after spending time and money
in planning. Referred to letter submitted by Mr. Greg Strakaluse that is in the packet. Explains what
happened at length. MPO staff will discuss possible preventative measures with the advisory
committees. As projects move forward, there may be a mechanism to have the agency requesting
funding check in with their governing body to ensure there is still support for the projects.
Secretary Nandam - The MPO has limited resources and over $400k was spent on design. There is a
reason the Work Program is brought to the committees and the Board. When the Work Program is
brought forward, it’s a good time to comment on projects, not only the new 5th year but the 4 preliminary
years as well.
Councilman Hutchison - The project was first conceived over 5 years ago. Ms. McLaughlin
explained that the process is to program projects in the new 5th year of the work program. In addition,
there is a lag between design and construction of 2 years. Councilman Hutchison - Effective
communication to the people who are involved and to the people who are affected would help alleviate
these types of circumstances. In a 10-year span much is changed. In the last few years water quality
has become very important and this project was very close to a large body of water.
Councilman Buxton - No one wants unnecessary spending. The makeup of people living in the
area has changed by 80%. The taxpayers that now live in that location came to the Council and
demanded this project not go through.
Secretary Nandam – The MPO needs to figure out the effective communication strategy for all
the projects and make sure that the MPO prioritization process keeps that in mind so that educated
decisions can be made on where to continue spending resources.
Councilman Hutchison - Build in the infrastructure piece that points us back to effective
communication.
Commissioner McDaniel – Many people don’t understand the length of time that projects take to
complete. Projects are easily 7 or 8 years out once they are initiated. Communication is imperative
to educate the public on the process.
F. Draft 2019 Project Priorities
Ms. McLaughlin - Priorities are still being vetted by the advisory committees. The Board will be
asked to adopt priorities at the June meeting. When these projects are brought to the Board, staff
wants to ensure that the projects are doable, feasible, and desired. Presented the draft priorities in
the packet. Regarding new Highway Priority – MPO staff suggested adding Corkscrew Road to the
4.A.a
Packet Pg. 14 Attachment: May 10, 2019 MPO Board Meeting Minutes (9242 : May 10, 2019 MPO Board Meeting Minutes)
Highway priorities list as a safety project. Collier County’s engineering group recommended this
proposal.
Commissioner Taylor – Question about the proposed diverging diamond on Pine Ridge Rd. Ms.
Scott - This priority is only for the I-75 interchange area. The amount shown is only a cost estimate.
$31 million in funding included as part of the County’s sales tax referendum. The County is
working with FDOT to bridge the funding gap. The PD&E will begin around October 1st and
hopefully validate the County’s previous study that shows the diverging diamond would work.
This still needs to remain a priority so FDOT can come to the table and partner with the County to
complete the corridor.
Commissioner McDaniel – Corkscrew Road is already in process. Ms. Scott - Collier County has
developed construction drawings. The road is in both Collier County and Lee County. Collier
County has been trying to partner with Lee County to have them come up with their half of the
funding. Collier County has requested safety funds from FDOT, but there are strict eligibility
criteria for safety funding. This will give it another avenue to potentially receive funding.
Ms. McLaughlin - Summarized the remaining priorities.
Councilman Hutchinson – Questioned how projects get on lists. Ms. McLaughlin - Agency staff
submitted projects for funding. Councilman Hutchinson – There are issues with Lake Park
Elementary and congestion. Cars are queuing onto Goodlette-Frank Road and causing an issue.
Ms. McLaughlin – Evaluating the queuing at schools is part of the Transportation System
Performance Report project that is just getting underway.
Ms. McLaughlin – Continued presenting priorities. There have been adjustments and updates to
the Transportation Regional Incentive Program priorities. Strategic Intermodal System has no
changes. The Transit Priority list has just been received by Collier County and will be taken to
advisory committees.
Commissioner McDaniel – Would like to see a partial interchange at Vanderbilt and I-75 brought
into the priority list at some point. Would be a huge benefit to the community. Noted that
comments are needed by next week in order to be included in the priorities for adoption.
11. Distribution Items
None.
12. Member Comments
Commissioner Solis - My understanding is that the interchange at Vanderbilt & I-75 has been looked
at and that there were certain restrictions that may or may not make it feasible. Secretary Nandam - A
planning level analysis has been incorporated into the PD&E Study for I-75. The answer on that study
would hopefully be available sooner than five years. Commissioner Solis - requested that the
presentation explaining the MPO, FDOT and local agency project funding and planning process be
given again. Ms. McLaughlin – Staff will coordinate with FDOT so the presentation will be given in
June.
Commissioner McDaniel - There has been a change in the dynamic between school planning and road
infrastructure. With the ‘School Choice’ option, parents can choose their child’s school and drive the
students, potentially adding to the number of vehicles on the roadway. There has been no cost-
consideration for the impacts on our infrastructure to support the intensity of what is transpiring with
4.A.a
Packet Pg. 15 Attachment: May 10, 2019 MPO Board Meeting Minutes (9242 : May 10, 2019 MPO Board Meeting Minutes)
schools. Would like to see the MPO make some suggestions and adjustments with regards to the impact
fees that schools collect, and potentially having a portion of those fees set aside to assist with planning,
engineering, future development, and construction costs. Lee County School District offers school
choice, but they bus their students. The school bus systems have around 10 thousand route trip changes
a year. Going forward this will need to be addressed.
Councilman Hutchison - The safety of our children and the ones who are transporting them should be
important to our community and the MPO. The TIP 2020-2024 draft described 10 planning factors, one
of which is to increase the safety of the transportation system for motorized and non-motorized users.
A project called Vision Zero has been adopted which calls for zero fatalities, zero serious injuries, etc.
Heart attacks are often covered up by the trauma resulting from vehicle accidents. There is a network
of Automated External Defibrillators (AED) in the City of Naples. There is an opportunity to extend
the knowledge of A.E. D’s and their locations and abilities to save lives in the most heavily traveled
roadways in Collier County. Would like staff to explore the merit of adding AED signage to FDOT
assets along highways and appropriate bicycle/pedestrian pathways in Collier County. Asked that
through a consensus decision from the MPO Board, the Executive Director and FDOT be directed to
review the merits of increasing the safety of Collier transportation system by incorporating A.E.D
wayfinding signage at appropriate locations. Could be reviewed?
Secretary Nandam – Vision Zero is a goal that is adopted by FDOT. It is a syst ems based approached.
However, wayfinding signage is a local community initiative. FDOT will be a partner, but it should
be a local effort.
Councilman Hutchinson – Suggested adding it to the same signs advertising food and gas on I-75.
Councilman Buxton - Make this an agenda item in September.
13. Next Meeting Date
Regular Meeting – June 14, 2019 – 9:00 a.m.
14. Adjourn
With no further comments Councilman Buxton adjourned the meeting at approximately 12:00 p.m.
4.A.a
Packet Pg. 16 Attachment: May 10, 2019 MPO Board Meeting Minutes (9242 : May 10, 2019 MPO Board Meeting Minutes)
06/14/2019
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Recommendation to approve Amendment 1 to Agreement No. 18-7408, 2045 Long Range
Transportation Plan (LRTP), to Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc.
OBJECTIVE: To amend Agreement No. 18-7408 to incorporate the Federal Lobbying Certificate and
additional Federal grant provisions.
CONSIDERATIONS: On March 8, 2019, the MPO Board entered into an Agreement with Jacobs
Engineering Group, Inc. to procure professional consulting services for the 2045 Long Range
Transportation Plan (See Attached Copy). Subsequently, the grants office discovered that it included an
incorrect lobbying certification and that several other grant clauses should also have been incorporated
into the agreement.
Amendment 1 includes the Federal Lobbying Certificate and the additional grant provisions required by
the grantors. Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc. has agreed to the amendment and the signed copy is
included as Attachment 1.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: This item is administrative in nature and does not require
committee review.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the Board approve Amendment 1 to Agreement No. 18-7408,
2045 LRTP and authorize the Chairman to sign the attached amendment.
Prepared By: Brandy Otero, MPO Principal Planner
ATTACHMENT(S)
1. Amendment 1 (PDF)
2. Original Contract (PDF)
4.B
Packet Pg. 17
06/14/2019
COLLIER COUNTY
Metropolitan Planning Organization
Item Number: 4.B
Doc ID: 9243
Item Summary: Recommendation to approve Amendment 1 to Agreement No. 18-7408, 2045
Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP), to Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc.
Meeting Date: 06/14/2019
Prepared by:
Title: – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Karen Intriago
06/06/2019 7:41 AM
Submitted by:
Title: Executive Director - MPO – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Anne McLaughlin
06/06/2019 7:41 AM
Approved By:
Review:
Metropolitan Planning Organization Brandy Otero MPO Analyst Review Completed 06/06/2019 8:17 AM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin MPO Executive Director Review Completed 06/06/2019 8:30 AM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin Meeting Pending 06/14/2019 9:00 AM
4.B
Packet Pg. 18
FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT #18-7408
IlIB
LONG RANGE TRANSPORA TION PLAN
Tms AMENDMENT is made and entered into on this day of 2019, by and
between Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc. (the "Contractor") and Collier Metropolitan Planning
Organization, Collier County, Florida ("MPO"):
WHEREAS, on March 8, 2019, (Agenda Item 9.B), the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization
entered into an Agreement with the Contractor to procure professional consulting services concerning Long
Range Transportation Plan in the amount of$599,006; and
WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the Agreement to add Federal Contract Provisions and
Certification Regarding Lobbying forms originally intended to be incorporated into the Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants herein contained, it is
agreed by the parties as follows:
1.Federal Contract Provisions (FCP-7 & FCP-8) and Certification Regarding Lobbying fonns are hereby
incorporated as Schedule G-1 to the Agreement.
2.Expect as modified through this Amendment, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall
remain the same.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto, have each, respectively, by an authorized person or
agent, have executed this Amendment on the date and year first written above.
CONTRACTOR:
JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP, INC.
By: ML6�J it'iinature
William D. Beddow, Client Account Manager
iType/print signature and titlei
May 14. 2019 Date
Contractor's Witnesses:
/SJ� Fir§l. Witness /St// �,.-.,,.er
tType/print witnes
ype/print witn�ss narnet
MPO:
COLLIER METROPOLITAN PLANNING
ORGANIZATION
By: __________ _ Signature
iType/print signature and title t
Date
4.B.a
Packet Pg. 19 Attachment: Amendment 1 (9243 : Recommendation to approve Amendment 1 to Agreement No. 18-7408, 2045 Long Range)
COLLIER COUNTY
Certification Regarding Lobbying
The undersigned certifies, to the best of his or her knowledge, that:
(1) No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned, to any
person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of an agency, a Member of Congress,
an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding
of any Federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of
any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any
Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement.
(2) If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for
influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer
or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this Federal contract,
grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form- LLL,
“Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying,” in accordance with its instructions.
(3) The undersigned shall require that the language of this certification be included in the award documents for
all subawards at all tiers (including subcontracts, subgrants, and contracts under grants, loans, and cooperative
agreements) and that all subrecipients shall certify and disclose accord ingly.
This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was
made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this
transaction imposed by 31, U.S.C. § 1352 (as amended by the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995). Any person
who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not
more than $100,000 for each such failure.
The Contractor, __________________________, certifies or affirms the truthfulness and accuracy of each
statement of its certification and disclosure, if any. In addition, the Contractor understands and agrees that the
provisions of 31 U.S.C. § 3801 et seq., apply to this certification and disclosure, if any.
In addition, the Contractor understands and agrees that the provisions of 11.062, Florida Statutes ., apply to this
certification and disclosure, if any.
Signa ture of Contractor's Authorized Official
Name of Authorized Official and Title
Date
02/18 R7
April 23, 2019
4.B.a
Packet Pg. 20 Attachment: Amendment 1 (9243 : Recommendation to approve Amendment 1 to Agreement No. 18-7408, 2045 Long Range)
EXHIBIT I-01 FEDERAL CONTRACT PROVISIONS
FCP-7
AC. Federal Changes: Consultant shall at all times comply with all applicable FTA regulations, policies,
procedures and directives, including without limitation those listed directly or by reference in the Master
Agreement between Purchaser and FTA, as they may be amended or promulgated from time to time during
the term of this contract. Consultant's failure to so comply shall constitute a material breach of this contract.
AD. Access to Record and Reports: a. Record Retention. The Consultant will retain and will require its
sub-Consultants of all tiers to retain, complete and readily accessible records related in whole or in part to
the contract, including, but not limited to, data, documents, reports, statistics, sub-agreements, leases,
subcontracts, arrangements, other third-party agreements of any type, and supporting materials related to
those records. b. Retention Period. The Consultant agrees to comply with the record retention requirements
in accordance with 2 C.F.R. § 200.333. The Consultant shall maintain all books, records, accounts and
reports required under this Contract for a period of at not less than three (3) years after the date of
termination or expiration of this Contract, except in the event of litigation or settlement of claims arising from
the performance of this Contract, in which case records shall be maintained until the disposition of all such
litigation, appeals, claims or exceptions related thereto. c. Access to Records. The Consultant agrees to
provide sufficient access to FTA and its Consultants to inspect and audit records and information related to
performance of this contract as reasonably may be required. d. Access to the Sites of Performance. The
Consultant agrees to permit FTA and its Consultants access to the sites of performance under this contract
as reasonably may be required.
AE. Incorporation of Federal Transit Administration Terms: The preceding provisions include, in part,
certain Standard Terms and Conditions required by DOT, whether expressly set forth in the preceding
contract provisions. All contractual provisions required by DOT, as set forth in FTA Circular 4220.1F, are
hereby incorporated by reference. Anything to the contrary herein notwithstanding, all FTA mandated
terms shall be deemed to control in the event of a conflict with other provisions contained in this
Agreement. The Consultant shall not perform any act, fail to perform any act, or refuse to comply with
any MPO requests which would cause the MPO to be in violation of the FTA terms and conditions.
AF. Civil Rights: The MPO is an Equal Opportunity Employer. As such, the MPO agrees to comply with
all applicable Federal civil rights laws and implementing regulations. Apart from inconsistent requirements
imposed by Federal laws or regulations, the MPO agrees to comply with the requirements of 49 U.S.C. §
5323(h) (3) by not using any Federal assistance awarded by FTA to support procurements using
exclusionary or discriminatory specifications.
Under this Agreement, the Contractor shall at all times comply with the following Federal Civil Rights laws
and regulations and shall include these requirements in each subcontract entered into as part thereof.
I. Nondiscrimination. In accordance with Federal transit law at 49 U.S.C. § 5332, the Contractor agrees that
it will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion,
national origin, sex, disability, gender identity or age. In addition, the Contractor agrees to comply with
applicable Federal implementing regulations and other implementing requirements FTA may issue.
II. Race, Color, Religion, National Origin, Sex. In accordance with Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, as
amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., and Federal transit laws at 49 U.S.C. § 5332, the Contractor agrees
to comply with all applicable equal employment opportunity requirements of U.S. Department of Labor (U.S.
DOL) regulations, "Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs, Equal Employment Opportunity,
Department of Labor," 41 C.F.R. chapter 60, and Executive Order No. 11246, "Equal Employment
Opportunity in Federal Employment," September 24, 1965, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e note, as amended by any
later Executive Order that amends or supersedes it, referenced in 42 U.S.C. § 2000e note. The Contractor
agrees to take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated
during employment, without regard to their race, color, religion, national origin, or sex (including sexual
orientation and gender identity). Such action shall include, but not be limited to, the following: employment,
promotion, demotion or transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination; rates of pay
or other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship. In addition, the
Contractor agrees to comply with any implementing requirements FTA may issue.
4.B.a
Packet Pg. 21 Attachment: Amendment 1 (9243 : Recommendation to approve Amendment 1 to Agreement No. 18-7408, 2045 Long Range)
EXHIBIT I-01 FEDERAL CONTRACT PROVISIONS
FCP-8
III. Age. In accordance with the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-634, U.S. Equal
Employment Opportunity Commission (U.S. EEOC) regulations, “Age Discrimination in Employment Act,”
29 C.F.R. part 1625, the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 6101 et seq., U.S.
Health and Human Services regulations, “Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Age in Programs or Activities
Receiving Federal Financial Assistance,” 45 C.F.R. part 90, and Federal transit law at 49 U.S.C. § 5332,
the Contractor agrees to refrain from discrimination against present and prospective employees for reason
of age. In addition, the Contractor agrees to comply with any implementing requirements FTA may issue.
IV. Disabilities. In accordance with section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. §
794, the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq., the Architectural
Barriers Act of 1968, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 4151 et seq., and Federal transit law at 49 U.S.C. § 5332,
the Contractor agrees that it will not discriminate against individuals on the basis of disability. In addition,
the Contractor agrees to comply with any implementing requirements FTA may issue.
AG. Lobbying: Contractors who apply or bid for an award of $100,000 or more shall file the certification
required by 49 CFR part 20, "New Restrictions on Lobbying." Each tier certifies to the tier above that it will
not and has not used Federal appropriated funds to pay any person or organization for influencing or
attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a member of Congress, officer or employee
of Congress, or an employee of a member of Congress in connection with obtaining any Federal contract,
grant or any other award covered by 31 U.S.C. 1352. Each tier shall also disclose the name of any
registrant under the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995 who has made lobbying contacts on its behalf with
non-Federal funds with respect to that Federal contract, grant or award covered by 31 U.S.C. 1352. Such
disclosures are forwarded from tier to tier up to the recipient.
AH. Prompt Payment and Return of Retainage (49 CFR Part 26): The prime contractor agrees to pay
each subcontractor under this prime contract for satisfactory performance of its contract no later than 30
days from the receipt of each payment the prime contract receives from the MPO. If retainage from DBE
subcontractors is allowed per the contract, the prime contractor agrees further to return retainage
payments to each subcontractor within 30 days after the subcontractors work is satisfactorily completed.
Any delay or postponement of payment from the above referenced time frame may occur only for good
cause following written approval of the MPO.
4.B.a
Packet Pg. 22 Attachment: Amendment 1 (9243 : Recommendation to approve Amendment 1 to Agreement No. 18-7408, 2045 Long Range)
4.B.b
Packet Pg. 23 Attachment: Original Contract (9243 : Recommendation to approve Amendment 1 to Agreement No. 18-7408, 2045 Long Range)
4.B.b
Packet Pg. 24 Attachment: Original Contract (9243 : Recommendation to approve Amendment 1 to Agreement No. 18-7408, 2045 Long Range)
4.B.b
Packet Pg. 25 Attachment: Original Contract (9243 : Recommendation to approve Amendment 1 to Agreement No. 18-7408, 2045 Long Range)
4.B.b
Packet Pg. 26 Attachment: Original Contract (9243 : Recommendation to approve Amendment 1 to Agreement No. 18-7408, 2045 Long Range)
4.B.b
Packet Pg. 27 Attachment: Original Contract (9243 : Recommendation to approve Amendment 1 to Agreement No. 18-7408, 2045 Long Range)
4.B.b
Packet Pg. 28 Attachment: Original Contract (9243 : Recommendation to approve Amendment 1 to Agreement No. 18-7408, 2045 Long Range)
4.B.b
Packet Pg. 29 Attachment: Original Contract (9243 : Recommendation to approve Amendment 1 to Agreement No. 18-7408, 2045 Long Range)
4.B.b
Packet Pg. 30 Attachment: Original Contract (9243 : Recommendation to approve Amendment 1 to Agreement No. 18-7408, 2045 Long Range)
4.B.b
Packet Pg. 31 Attachment: Original Contract (9243 : Recommendation to approve Amendment 1 to Agreement No. 18-7408, 2045 Long Range)
4.B.b
Packet Pg. 32 Attachment: Original Contract (9243 : Recommendation to approve Amendment 1 to Agreement No. 18-7408, 2045 Long Range)
4.B.b
Packet Pg. 33 Attachment: Original Contract (9243 : Recommendation to approve Amendment 1 to Agreement No. 18-7408, 2045 Long Range)
4.B.b
Packet Pg. 34 Attachment: Original Contract (9243 : Recommendation to approve Amendment 1 to Agreement No. 18-7408, 2045 Long Range)
4.B.b
Packet Pg. 35 Attachment: Original Contract (9243 : Recommendation to approve Amendment 1 to Agreement No. 18-7408, 2045 Long Range)
4.B.b
Packet Pg. 36 Attachment: Original Contract (9243 : Recommendation to approve Amendment 1 to Agreement No. 18-7408, 2045 Long Range)
4.B.b
Packet Pg. 37 Attachment: Original Contract (9243 : Recommendation to approve Amendment 1 to Agreement No. 18-7408, 2045 Long Range)
4.B.b
Packet Pg. 38 Attachment: Original Contract (9243 : Recommendation to approve Amendment 1 to Agreement No. 18-7408, 2045 Long Range)
4.B.b
Packet Pg. 39 Attachment: Original Contract (9243 : Recommendation to approve Amendment 1 to Agreement No. 18-7408, 2045 Long Range)
4.B.b
Packet Pg. 40 Attachment: Original Contract (9243 : Recommendation to approve Amendment 1 to Agreement No. 18-7408, 2045 Long Range)
4.B.b
Packet Pg. 41 Attachment: Original Contract (9243 : Recommendation to approve Amendment 1 to Agreement No. 18-7408, 2045 Long Range)
4.B.b
Packet Pg. 42 Attachment: Original Contract (9243 : Recommendation to approve Amendment 1 to Agreement No. 18-7408, 2045 Long Range)
4.B.b
Packet Pg. 43 Attachment: Original Contract (9243 : Recommendation to approve Amendment 1 to Agreement No. 18-7408, 2045 Long Range)
4.B.b
Packet Pg. 44 Attachment: Original Contract (9243 : Recommendation to approve Amendment 1 to Agreement No. 18-7408, 2045 Long Range)
4.B.b
Packet Pg. 45 Attachment: Original Contract (9243 : Recommendation to approve Amendment 1 to Agreement No. 18-7408, 2045 Long Range)
4.B.b
Packet Pg. 46 Attachment: Original Contract (9243 : Recommendation to approve Amendment 1 to Agreement No. 18-7408, 2045 Long Range)
4.B.b
Packet Pg. 47 Attachment: Original Contract (9243 : Recommendation to approve Amendment 1 to Agreement No. 18-7408, 2045 Long Range)
4.B.b
Packet Pg. 48 Attachment: Original Contract (9243 : Recommendation to approve Amendment 1 to Agreement No. 18-7408, 2045 Long Range)
4.B.b
Packet Pg. 49 Attachment: Original Contract (9243 : Recommendation to approve Amendment 1 to Agreement No. 18-7408, 2045 Long Range)
4.B.b
Packet Pg. 50 Attachment: Original Contract (9243 : Recommendation to approve Amendment 1 to Agreement No. 18-7408, 2045 Long Range)
4.B.b
Packet Pg. 51 Attachment: Original Contract (9243 : Recommendation to approve Amendment 1 to Agreement No. 18-7408, 2045 Long Range)
4.B.b
Packet Pg. 52 Attachment: Original Contract (9243 : Recommendation to approve Amendment 1 to Agreement No. 18-7408, 2045 Long Range)
4.B.b
Packet Pg. 53 Attachment: Original Contract (9243 : Recommendation to approve Amendment 1 to Agreement No. 18-7408, 2045 Long Range)
4.B.b
Packet Pg. 54 Attachment: Original Contract (9243 : Recommendation to approve Amendment 1 to Agreement No. 18-7408, 2045 Long Range)
4.B.b
Packet Pg. 55 Attachment: Original Contract (9243 : Recommendation to approve Amendment 1 to Agreement No. 18-7408, 2045 Long Range)
4.B.b
Packet Pg. 56 Attachment: Original Contract (9243 : Recommendation to approve Amendment 1 to Agreement No. 18-7408, 2045 Long Range)
4.B.b
Packet Pg. 57 Attachment: Original Contract (9243 : Recommendation to approve Amendment 1 to Agreement No. 18-7408, 2045 Long Range)
4.B.b
Packet Pg. 58 Attachment: Original Contract (9243 : Recommendation to approve Amendment 1 to Agreement No. 18-7408, 2045 Long Range)
4.B.b
Packet Pg. 59 Attachment: Original Contract (9243 : Recommendation to approve Amendment 1 to Agreement No. 18-7408, 2045 Long Range)
4.B.b
Packet Pg. 60 Attachment: Original Contract (9243 : Recommendation to approve Amendment 1 to Agreement No. 18-7408, 2045 Long Range)
4.B.b
Packet Pg. 61 Attachment: Original Contract (9243 : Recommendation to approve Amendment 1 to Agreement No. 18-7408, 2045 Long Range)
4.B.b
Packet Pg. 62 Attachment: Original Contract (9243 : Recommendation to approve Amendment 1 to Agreement No. 18-7408, 2045 Long Range)
4.B.b
Packet Pg. 63 Attachment: Original Contract (9243 : Recommendation to approve Amendment 1 to Agreement No. 18-7408, 2045 Long Range)
4.B.b
Packet Pg. 64 Attachment: Original Contract (9243 : Recommendation to approve Amendment 1 to Agreement No. 18-7408, 2045 Long Range)
4.B.b
Packet Pg. 65 Attachment: Original Contract (9243 : Recommendation to approve Amendment 1 to Agreement No. 18-7408, 2045 Long Range)
4.B.b
Packet Pg. 66 Attachment: Original Contract (9243 : Recommendation to approve Amendment 1 to Agreement No. 18-7408, 2045 Long Range)
4.B.b
Packet Pg. 67 Attachment: Original Contract (9243 : Recommendation to approve Amendment 1 to Agreement No. 18-7408, 2045 Long Range)
4.B.b
Packet Pg. 68 Attachment: Original Contract (9243 : Recommendation to approve Amendment 1 to Agreement No. 18-7408, 2045 Long Range)
4.B.b
Packet Pg. 69 Attachment: Original Contract (9243 : Recommendation to approve Amendment 1 to Agreement No. 18-7408, 2045 Long Range)
4.B.b
Packet Pg. 70 Attachment: Original Contract (9243 : Recommendation to approve Amendment 1 to Agreement No. 18-7408, 2045 Long Range)
4.B.b
Packet Pg. 71 Attachment: Original Contract (9243 : Recommendation to approve Amendment 1 to Agreement No. 18-7408, 2045 Long Range)
4.B.b
Packet Pg. 72 Attachment: Original Contract (9243 : Recommendation to approve Amendment 1 to Agreement No. 18-7408, 2045 Long Range)
4.B.b
Packet Pg. 73 Attachment: Original Contract (9243 : Recommendation to approve Amendment 1 to Agreement No. 18-7408, 2045 Long Range)
4.B.b
Packet Pg. 74 Attachment: Original Contract (9243 : Recommendation to approve Amendment 1 to Agreement No. 18-7408, 2045 Long Range)
4.B.b
Packet Pg. 75 Attachment: Original Contract (9243 : Recommendation to approve Amendment 1 to Agreement No. 18-7408, 2045 Long Range)
4.B.b
Packet Pg. 76 Attachment: Original Contract (9243 : Recommendation to approve Amendment 1 to Agreement No. 18-7408, 2045 Long Range)
4.B.b
Packet Pg. 77 Attachment: Original Contract (9243 : Recommendation to approve Amendment 1 to Agreement No. 18-7408, 2045 Long Range)
4.B.b
Packet Pg. 78 Attachment: Original Contract (9243 : Recommendation to approve Amendment 1 to Agreement No. 18-7408, 2045 Long Range)
4.B.b
Packet Pg. 79 Attachment: Original Contract (9243 : Recommendation to approve Amendment 1 to Agreement No. 18-7408, 2045 Long Range)
4.B.b
Packet Pg. 80 Attachment: Original Contract (9243 : Recommendation to approve Amendment 1 to Agreement No. 18-7408, 2045 Long Range)
06/14/2019
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Citizens Advisory Committee Chair Report
OBJECTIVE: For the MPO Board to receive a report from the Chair of the Citizens Advisory
Committee (CAC) related to recent committee actions and recommendations.
CONSIDERATIONS: Staff prepared the attached written report. The CAC Chair will provide a verbal
report providing additional information regarding recent committee activities.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Committee recommendations are reported in the Executive
Summary for each action item, and may be elaborated upon by the Chair in his/her report to the Board.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable
Prepared by: Eric Ortman, Senior Planner
ATTACHMENT(S)
1. CAC Chair Report (PDF)
7.A.1
Packet Pg. 81
06/14/2019
COLLIER COUNTY
Metropolitan Planning Organization
Item Number: 7.A.1
Doc ID: 9244
Item Summary: Citizens Advisory Committee Chair Report
Meeting Date: 06/14/2019
Prepared by:
Title: – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Karen Intriago
06/06/2019 7:45 AM
Submitted by:
Title: Executive Director - MPO – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Anne McLaughlin
06/06/2019 7:45 AM
Approved By:
Review:
Metropolitan Planning Organization Brandy Otero MPO Analyst Review Completed 06/06/2019 8:13 AM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin MPO Executive Director Review Completed 06/06/2019 8:27 AM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin Meeting Pending 06/14/2019 9:00 AM
7.A.1
Packet Pg. 82
CAC Committee Chair Report
The Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC) met on May 20, 2019 and a quorum was achieved.
Agency Reports
Ms. Peters, FDOT Liaison to the MPO, gave the FDOT agency report. Noted that the last signal warrant
study at the intersection of SR29 and Westclox Dr was done in 2015, and that an intersection analysis was
done in 2016. The Department is still analyzing what the best solution may be. The date for the Public
Hearing for the SR29 corridor project has not yet been set.
The Committee Unanimously Endorsed:
• FY2020–FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)
• 2019 Project Priorities
• Amendment to the FY2019-FY2023 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) for Immokalee
Complete Streets Project
• Resolution in support of the Naples Pathways Coalition’s Paradise Coast Trail Vision
Reports and Presentations
• Long Range Transportation Plan - MPO staff gave a brief presentation to kick-off the 2045 LRTP. Two
committee members expressed opinions that flying cars and other ways to move people, e.g., mono-rail
should be investigated during the LRTP. Also commented that alternative materials such as pervious
pavement should be included.
• Committee Recommendations for Expanding SU Priority Categories
o Provide flexibility in policy
o Safety would be a good option if priorities are expanded
• Discuss Reconfirming Support for Project Priorities
o Comments both for and against assigning some sort of penalty
o Check-in prior to expending any funds is a good idea
The next regularly scheduled meeting is on August 26, 2019 at 2:00 p.m.
7.A.1.a
Packet Pg. 83 Attachment: CAC Chair Report (9244 : Citizens Advisory Committee Chair Report)
06/14/2019
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Technical Advisory Committee Chair Report
OBJECTIVE: For the MPO Board to receive a report from the Chair of the Technical Advisory
Committee related to recent committee actions and recommendations.
CONSIDERATIONS: Staff prepared the attached written report. Staff typically provides a verbal report
at the MPO Board meeting, although the Chair is welcome to do so.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Committee recommendations are reported in the Executive
Summary for each action item, and may be elaborated upon by the Chair in his/her report to the Board.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable
Prepared by: Anne McLaughlin, MPO Director
ATTACHMENT(S)
1. TAC Chair Report (PDF)
7.B.1
Packet Pg. 84
06/14/2019
COLLIER COUNTY
Metropolitan Planning Organization
Item Number: 7.B.1
Doc ID: 9245
Item Summary: Technical Advisory Committee Chair Report
Meeting Date: 06/14/2019
Prepared by:
Title: – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Karen Intriago
06/06/2019 8:03 AM
Submitted by:
Title: Executive Director - MPO – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Anne McLaughlin
06/06/2019 8:03 AM
Approved By:
Review:
Metropolitan Planning Organization Brandy Otero MPO Analyst Review Completed 06/06/2019 8:19 AM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin MPO Executive Director Review Completed 06/06/2019 8:31 AM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin Meeting Pending 06/14/2019 9:00 AM
7.B.1
Packet Pg. 85
TAC Committee Chair Report
The Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) met on May 20, 2019, but did not achieve a quorum. The Chair
took the committee through non-action items on the agenda in anticipation that a quorum might eventually
materialize. That did not occur.
Agency Reports
Ms. Peters, FDOT Liaison to the MPO, gave the FDOT agency report: noted that MPO staff had done very
good work on the TIP; the only missing item on FDOT’s checklist is the date of the next FHWA/FDOT
certification review, which staff will add.
Committee Actions
• No formal actions due to lack of quorum
• County staff provided revised project limits as a correction for FPN 4455811 Immokalee Complete
Streets [MPO staff incorporated revisions in the TIP amendment and new TIP,]
Reports and Presentations
• MPO staff gave a brief presentation on the 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan using the same PPT
slides that Jacobs Engineering presented to the MPO Board on May 10, 2019. Committee members
offered suggestions to develop additional goals pertaining to Automated and Connected Vehicles
(AVCV), sea level rise, resiliency and mobility on demand.
• MPO staff gave a report on the issue of reconfirming priority projects which came up at the May 10th
Board meeting related to the Naples City Council’s recent vote against signing a maintenance
agreement with FDOT for the Beach Access Sidewalk project in the TIP. The committee discussed
possible responses to reduce the future likelihood of such events occurring:
1. Possible payback of the funds expended
2. Need for better coordination of the MPO staff and the agency requesting the project
funding, possibly at the LAP coordination meetings with FDOT, agency and MPO or when
FDOT requires the agency sign any agreement or contract
3. Need for the MPO Board and agencies to better understand the process (TIP, Priorities,
Draft Tentative Work Program and the appropriate times for review/comments/change,
edits, etc
4. Call for priority timing changes 3 years out versus 5 years – the identified drawback was
also related to the larger, more expanded list of projects to choose from to avoid a fiscal
constraint
5. Lower ranking of the agency’s future projects – this was also discussed as decreasing the
list of eligible projects
• The Naples Pathways Coalition (NPC) gave a presentation on their Pacific Coast Trail Vision.
Committee members commented that the vision map should extend connections to Marco Island
and Everglades City. The NPC explained that their intention is to focus on what can be
accomplished using the existing SUNTrail alignment with added connections to Golden Gate City
7.B.1.a
Packet Pg. 86 Attachment: TAC Chair Report (9245 : Technical Advisory Committee Chair Report)
and Immokalee that are likely to be perceived as positive, without generating a great deal of
concern over possible cultural and environmental impacts.
The next regularly scheduled meeting is on August 26, 2019 at 9:30 a.m.
7.B.1.a
Packet Pg. 87 Attachment: TAC Chair Report (9245 : Technical Advisory Committee Chair Report)
06/14/2019
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee Chair Report
OBJECTIVE: For the MPO Board to receive a report from the Chair of the Bicycle and Pedestrian
Advisory Committee (BPAC) related to recent committee actions and recommendations.
CONSIDERATIONS: Staff prepared the attached written report. The BPAC Chair will provide a verbal
report providing additional information regarding recent committee activities.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Committee recommendations are reported in the Executive
Summary for each action item, and may be elaborated upon by the Chair in his/her report to the Board.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable
Prepared by: Eric Ortman, Senior Planner
ATTACHMENT(S)
1. BPAC Chair Report (PDF)
7.C.1
Packet Pg. 88
06/14/2019
COLLIER COUNTY
Metropolitan Planning Organization
Item Number: 7.C.1
Doc ID: 9246
Item Summary: Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee Chair Report
Meeting Date: 06/14/2019
Prepared by:
Title: – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Karen Intriago
06/06/2019 8:08 AM
Submitted by:
Title: Executive Director - MPO – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Anne McLaughlin
06/06/2019 8:08 AM
Approved By:
Review:
Metropolitan Planning Organization Brandy Otero MPO Analyst Review Completed 06/06/2019 8:12 AM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin MPO Executive Director Review Completed 06/06/2019 8:26 AM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin Meeting Pending 06/14/2019 9:00 AM
7.C.1
Packet Pg. 89
BPAC Committee Chair Report
The Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) met on May 21, 2019 and a quorum was
achieved.
Agency Reports
Mr. Agacinski, FDOT D1 Bicycle Pedestrian Coordinator, noted that:
• FDOT’s E-Grant Application process was expected to be completed before the end of the year
• Accepted another position within FDOT as a project manager; would remain as bike ped
coordination until a replacement was found
Committee Actions
• Unanimously endorsed the call for non-motorized projects’ application forms, process and timeline.
• Endorsed MPO Resolution in support of the Naples Pathways Coalition’s Paradise Coast Trail Vision
by a 6:1 vote with two abstentions. Mr. Ordija was opposed; Ms. Fendrick and Mr. Musico abstained.
• After lengthy discussion and some confusion, the Committee endorsed the FY2020-FY2024 TIP and
the 2019 Bicycle Pedestrian Priorities with two conditions: the Number 2 Bicycle Pedestrian Priority
on Vanderbilt Drive be changed from a sidewalk project to a bike path project and Number 14 on the
Priority list – a shared use pathway on Immokalee Rd between Strand Blvd and Northbrooke Dr - be
removed and resubmitted by the County at a later date.
Reports and Presentations
• Committee suggested the following with regards to expanding the list of SU project priorities:
o Add safety projects focused on bicycle and pedestrian safety
o Allow substitution of a project from one of the other two categories (pathways, bridges, congestion
management) with the caveat that the amount of the funding be returned to the original category
o Keep the unfunded priority list as a fallback should an additional project be needed to replace a
project
• Committee suggested the following with regards to reconfirming support for project priorities:
o Create a check-in one year prior to beginning to spend funding on a project priority
o An agency cannot substitute one of their projects on the priority list for one that they wish to
withdraw
The next regularly scheduled meeting is on August 20, 2019 at 9:00 a.m.
7.C.1.a
Packet Pg. 90 Attachment: BPAC Chair Report (9246 : Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee Chair Report)
06/14/2019
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Approve Amendment to Fiscal Year 2019 - 2023 Transportation Improvement Program
OBJECTIVE: For the Board to approve an amendment to the FY2019 -2023 Transportation
Improvement Program (TIP).
CONSIDERATIONS: The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) has requested an amendment
to the FY2019-FY2023 TIP to include the TIGER Grant awarded to Collier County for Immokalee
Complete Streets. The project and funding are currently not shown in the FY2019 -FY2023 TIP and the
amendment is necessary to ensure authorization of federal funds and planning consistency.
The total amount of the amendment is $16,415,864 composed of $13,132,691 from the TIGER grant and
$3,283,173 in matching funds from Collier County. The project will be constructed in FY2019 through
FY2022. The MPO amendment form requiring signatures and the project sheet are included as
Attachment 1. The FDOT letter requesting the amendment is included as Attachment 2. This
amendment is the result of a legislative appropriation therefore, it does not affect nor is it included in, the
fiscal constraint for this TIP.
The MPO is completing the public involvement steps listed below per the MPO’s Public Participation
Plan for TIP amendments. No public comments have been received at the time of writing this ES.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: The Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) did not have a
quorum at the May meeting so was unable to vote; however, County staff provided a correction to the
project description that has been incorporated in the Project Sheet. The Citizens Advisory Committee
(CAC) unanimously endorsed the amendment at their May 20, 2019 meeting.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the Board approve the amendment to the FY2019-2023
Transportation Improvement Program (TIP).
Prepared By: Eric Ortman, MPO Senior Planner
ATTACHMENT(S)
1. TIP Signature Page & Project Sheet (PDF)
2. FDOT letter requesting Amendment (PDF)
8.A
Packet Pg. 91
06/14/2019
COLLIER COUNTY
Metropolitan Planning Organization
Item Number: 8.A
Doc ID: 9247
Item Summary: Approve Amendment to Fiscal Year 2019 – 2023 Transportation Improvement
Program(TIP)
Meeting Date: 06/14/2019
Prepared by:
Title: – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Karen Intriago
06/06/2019 8:13 AM
Submitted by:
Title: Executive Director - MPO – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Anne McLaughlin
06/06/2019 8:13 AM
Approved By:
Review:
Metropolitan Planning Organization Brandy Otero MPO Analyst Review Completed 06/06/2019 8:29 AM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin MPO Executive Director Review Completed 06/06/2019 8:32 AM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin Meeting Pending 06/14/2019 9:00 AM
8.A
Packet Pg. 92
8.A.1Packet Pg. 93Attachment: TIP Signature Page & Project Sheet (9247 : Approve Amendment to Fiscal Year 2019 – 2023
4455811
Project Description:
Work Summary:
Lead Agency:
Phase Fund
DSB TIGER IX IDSB LF
------lotef.-
Collier MPO TIP FY2019-FY2023
IMMOKALEE COMPLETE STREETS
Sidewalks, bike lanes, drainage and other improvements generally
in the vicinity of Immokalee.
SIDEWALKS/ COMPLETE STREETS
Collier County Length: N/A
2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 Total
13,132,691 I 13,132,691
3,283,173 3,283,173
The funds will be spent over the course of the 0
four fiscal years shown. 0
0
0
0
0
0
16,415,864 0 16,415,864
NOTE: This project is the result of a TIGER Grant being awarded to Collier County.
TIGER Grants are not fiscally constrained therefore this project does not effect, nor is it shown in,
the fiscal constraint that is present in this TIP.
Prior Years Cost: 0
Future Years Cost:
Total Project Cost: 16,415,864
LRTP Ref:
94B
Pending MPO Board Adoption on June 14, 2019 Project Costs are projected based on anticipated funds which are based on receipt and expenditure of these funds.
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 94 Attachment: TIP Signature Page & Project Sheet (9247 : Approve Amendment to Fiscal Year 2019 – 2023
8.A.2
Packet Pg. 95 Attachment: FDOT letter requesting Amendment (9247 : Approve Amendment to Fiscal Year 2019 – 2023 Transportation Improvement Program)
8.A.2
Packet Pg. 96 Attachment: FDOT letter requesting Amendment (9247 : Approve Amendment to Fiscal Year 2019 – 2023 Transportation Improvement Program)
06/14/2019
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Adopt Fiscal Year 2020 - 2024 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)
OBJECTIVE: For the Board to adopt the FY2020 - FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program
(TIP).
CONSIDERATIONS: Attachment 1 contains the Final Draft MPO FY2020 - FY2024 Transportation
Improvement Program (TIP). All agency and MPO member comments received as of May 29 th have been
incorporated into the document. The MPO is completing the public involvement steps per the MPO’s
Public Participation Plan. Public comments are included in Appendix G (page 180).
This TIP includes total programmed funding of $494 million; a $95 million (24%) increase from the
previous year’s TIP. The funding is broken down as shown in the table below. Maintenance funding
increased by $103 million and is the only category with a significant change in funding. Maintenance now
accounts for 33 percent of the total funding compared to 15 percent in last year’s TIP.
Category Amount
(millions)
% of
Total
Highways $235 48%
Maintenance $163 33%
Transit $36 7%
Aviation $21 4%
Bicycle & Pedestrian $18 4%
Congestion Management $10 2%
Bridges $9 2%
Planning $2 <1%
Two major projects have been delayed. Construction of I-75@951 (Collier Blvd) has been moved from
FY21 to FY24. Construction of SR82 from Gator Slough to SR29 has been moved from FY19 to FY20.
New projects that have not been in a previous TIP include the construction of the 16 th St Bridge in FY22,
and a PD&E Study for the I-75-Pine Ridge Interchange in FY20.
Major projects include:
• Six projects to add lanes and reconstruct on SR29 with the section between SR82 and the Hendry
County line programmed for construction in this TIP
• Two projects on SR82 (which covers the entire road in Collier County) programmed for
construction in this TIP
• Two I-75 interchange projects with construction of the 951/Collier Interchange scheduled for
FY24
• Resurfacing projects on I-75 and US41 totaling $125 million
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: The TAC and CAC reviewed the draft TIP at their April
meeting. Comments from those meetings are reflected in the final draft. The CAC unanimously endorsed
the TIP at their May 20, 2019 meeting. The TAC did not obtain a quorum at their May meeting, so no
action was taken on the TIP; however the Committee Chair provided a clarification on the location of the
Complete Streets Project in Immokalee which has been incorporated in Attachment 1. The BPAC voted
to endorse the TIP at their May 21st meeting.
8.B
Packet Pg. 97
06/14/2019
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the Board adopt the FY2020 - FY2024 Transportation
Improvement Program (TIP) as shown in Attachment 1.
Prepared By: Eric Ortman, MPO Senior Planner
ATTACHMENT(S)
1. Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (PDF)
8.B
Packet Pg. 98
06/14/2019
COLLIER COUNTY
Metropolitan Planning Organization
Item Number: 8.B
Doc ID: 9248
Item Summary: Adopt Fiscal Year 2020 – 2024 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)
Meeting Date: 06/14/2019
Prepared by:
Title: – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Karen Intriago
06/06/2019 8:17 AM
Submitted by:
Title: Executive Director - MPO – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Anne McLaughlin
06/06/2019 8:17 AM
Approved By:
Review:
Metropolitan Planning Organization Brandy Otero MPO Analyst Review Completed 06/06/2019 8:39 AM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin MPO Executive Director Review Completed 06/06/2019 8:43 AM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin Meeting Pending 06/14/2019 9:00 AM
8.B
Packet Pg. 99
COLLIER METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY2020 - FY2024 DRAFT Pending Adoption: June 14, 2019 QR Code The preparation of this report has been financed in part through grants from the Federal Highway Administration and Federal Transit Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, under the Metropolitan Planning Program, Sections 134 and 135 of Title 23 U.S. Code. The contents of this report do not necessarily reflect the official views or policy of the U.S. Department of Transportation. 8.B.1Packet Pg. 100Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
COLLIER METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION Councilman Reg Buxton, MPO Chair City of Naples Councilwoman Elaine Middelstaedt Esq., MPO Vice-Chair City of Everglades City Councilman Erik Brechnitz Commissioner Burt L. Saunders City of Marco Island Collier County (District 3) Commissioner Donna Fiala Commissioner Andy Solis, Esq. Collier County (District 1) Collier County (District 2) Councilman Terry Hutchison Commissioner Penny Taylor City of Naples Collier County (District 4) Commissioner William L. McDaniel Jr. Collier County (District 5) Anne McLaughlin Scott R. Teach, Esq. MPO Executive Director Collier County Deputy Attorney 8.B.1Packet Pg. 101Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
SECTIONPAGEMPO Resolution…………………………………………...……………………………………………………………………………1Collier Metropolitan Planning Area Map..……….…………………………………………………………….……………2Bonita Springs ‐ Naples Urbanized Area Map………………………………………………………………………………3Narrative……………………....….………………………..………….………………………………………...….……………………4Purpose…………………......…………..….…………………..……..……...………….………………………….……..…4Funding Sources………………………………………………………………………………………...…….....….………6Highway Funding Sources.........……………...…..………….………….…….……………………...…7Transit Funding Sources………………….…....……….…………..…………………….…………………10Addressing Safety Performance Measures and Targets….……..………...………...……………………13Project Selection / MPO Priorities….….…....………………..……………….…...…………………..…….……19Highway Related Priorities………………….......……………….……………….……………….………21Strategic Intermodal System (SIS) Priorities..…….…...……………….….………………………22Bridge Priorities………………..……..………………………………………...……………………………… 25Transit Priorities…………………………….……………………......…….…………………………..….….26Congestion Management Priorities……….....……..……………………….....…………………… 27Bicycle and Pedestrian Priorities……………………….......………………………………………..…29Transportation Regional Incentive Program (TRIP)…………………......……………….………30Regional Transportation Alternatives Program (RTAP)...…………………..…………...….…30Major Projects………………………………………………………………..........…………………………………………32Public Involvement……………………………………………………...…….…..……………………………………… 33TIP Amendments…………………..………………………...………………….………...…………….…………………33Certification……………….……………………...…………………………………..………………………..……..………34Project Organization…….……………………...…………………………………..………………………..……..……34Explanation of Project Costs in the TIP……………….……………………...……………………………………35Project Sheet Example……………….……………………...…………………………………………..……..…………36TABLE OF CONTENTS8.B.1Packet Pg. 102Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
SECTIONPAGEPart I ‐ Project Sheets from FDOT's Five‐Year Work Program FY2019/20 ‐ FY2023/24.....……………37Section A‐1: Highway Projects..…...…..…………………………………………………………………...…...… 37Section A‐2: Bridge Priorities……………...………………………………………...……………….……………… 52Section A‐3: Congestion Management Projects……………………….……………………….………….… 56Section A‐4: Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects………………………………………………………………..… 66Section A‐5: Maintenance Projects...………………………………..………………………….………..…………85Section B: Transportation Planning Projects………………………………………………..…………...………98Section C: Transit Projects………………………........…...…………………………….……..………………...…102Section D: Transportation Disadvantaged Projects………………………………...……………….........110Section E: Aviation Projects…………………………………………………………………………….……....…….…112PART II: Collier County Projects………………………….….……..…….………………………………………………………121PART III: City of Naples Projects………………………………...…………………….…….…….…………………..…….…123PART IV: City of Marco Island Projects……...………...…………………..……………………………………………….124PART V: City of Everglades City Projects……………………………………………...………………………………………125PART VI: Federal Funding Obligations………..…………………………………...…………………………………………128PART VII: FTA Obligated Projects for 2018………………………………………………………………………………… 139PART VIII: Collier County Funding Summary………………………………………….…………………….………………141PART IX: Appendices………………………………………………………………………………………...….……………………143Appendix A: FDOT's Strategic Intermodal System Funding Strategy………...………………………144Appendix B: Collier‐Lee Regional Highway Map………..…………………...……………………………… 158Appendix C: Airport Capital Improvement Programs (JACIP)……………...……….….…………….…160Appendix D: Acronyms and Funding and Phase Codes.……………………….……………………………169Appendix E: Collier MPO's LRTP Cost Feasible Plan (Highway & Transit)…………………....……172Appendix F: Federal Lands Appropriations……………………………………….………………………………177Appendix G: Summary of Public Comments……………………………………...……………………...…… 180Appendix H: Fiscal Constraint…………………………………………………..………………….…………….……185Appendix I: Criteria Used for Project Prioritization…………………….………….…………………...……187Appendix J: Transportation Performance Measures Consensus Planning Document ………192Appendix K: Amendments and Administrative Modifications……………………….…………………1998.B.1Packet Pg. 103Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
MPO RESOLUTION #2019-03 A RESOLUTION OF THE COLLIER METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION ENDORSING THE FY 2019/20 – 2023/24 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (TIP) WHEREAS, the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization is required to develop an annually updated Transportation Improvement Program pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 134(j), 23 C.F.R. 450.104, 23 C.F.R. 450.324(a), and F.S. 339.175(8)(c)(1); and WHEREAS, the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization has reviewed the proposed Transportation Improvement Program and determined that is consistent with its adopted Plans and Program; and WHEREAS, in accordance with the Florida Department of Transportation’s MPO Administrative Manual, the Transportation Improvement Program must be accompanied by an endorsement indicating official MPO approval; THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization that: 1.The FY 2019/20 – 2023/24 Transportation Improvement Program and the projects programmed therein are hereby adopted.2.The Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization’s Chairman is hereby authorized to execute this Resolution certifying theMPO Board’s endorsement of the FY 2019/20 – 2023/24 Transportation Improvement Program and the projects programmedtherein.This Resolution PASSED and duly adopted by the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization Board after majority vote on this 14thday of June 2019. Attest: COLLIER METROPOLITAN PLANNNING ORGANIZATION By: _________________________ By: _____________________________________________ Anne McLaughlin Councilman Reg Buxton MPO Executive Director Collier MPO Chairman Approved as to form and legality: ______________________________ Scott R. Teach, Deputy County Attorney 18.B.1Packet Pg. 104Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
Figure 1 – Collier Metropolitan Planning Area (MPA) 28.B.1Packet Pg. 105Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
Figure 2 – Bonita Springs – Naples Urbanized Area Map38.B.1Packet Pg. 106Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
NARRATIVE PURPOSE The Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) is required by Title 23 United States Code (U.S.C.) 134(j); Florida State Statutes; and Federal Transportation Legislation, Moving Ahead for Progress in the Twenty-First Century Act (MAP- 21) and the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act (FAST Act) signed into law in December 2015, to develop aTransportation Improvement Program (TIP) that is approved by both the MPO and the Governor of Florida (or the Governor’sdelegate). The FAST Act (23 U.S.C. 133(h) §1109) carries forward policies initiated by MAP-21, which created astreamlined and performance-based surface transportation program that builds on many of the highway, transit, bike, andpedestrian programs and policies established in previous transportation legislation. These programs address the manychallenges facing the U.S. transportation system including: improving safety, maintaining infrastructure condition, reducingtraffic congestion, improving efficiency of the system and of freight movement, protecting the environment, and reducingdelays in project delivery. The FAST Act added reducing or mitigating storm water impacts of surface transportation, andenhancing travel and tourism to the nationwide transportation goals identified in MAP-21.The FAST Act establishes theNationally Significant Freight and Highway Projects (NSFHP) program to provide competitive grants – FosteringAdvancement in Shipping and Transportation for the Long-term Achievement of National Efficiencies (FASTLANE) – tonationally and regionally significant freight and highway projects that align with national transportation goals.The TIP is developed by the MPO in cooperation with the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), state and local governments, and public transit operators who are each responsible for providing the MPO with estimates of available federal and state funds. This collaborative effort ensures that projects programmed in the FDOT Work Program address the MPO’s highest transportation project priorities and are consistent with the overall transportation goals of the surrounding metropolitan area. Following approval by the MPO Board and the Governor of Florida, the TIP is included in the FDOT State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP). The TIP is a five-year, fiscally constrained, multi-modal program of transportation projects within the Collier Metropolitan Planning Area (MPA). The MPA is the geographic planning region for the MPO (see Figure 1 above). The projects in the TIP are presented in Year of Expenditure (YOE) dollars which takes inflation into account. TIP projects include highway, transit, sidewalk/bicycle paths and/or facilities, congestion management, road and bridge maintenance, transportation planning, and transportation alternative program activities to be funded by 23 C.F.R. 450.324(c). The TIP also includes aviation projects; and all regionally significant transportation projects for which Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) or Federal Transit Administration (FTA) approval is required. For informational purposes, this TIP also identifies other transportation projects, as defined in 40 CFR 450.324 (c)(d), that are not funded with federal funds. 48.B.1Packet Pg. 107Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
The TIP for the Collier MPO is fiscally constrained by year so that financial resources can be directed towards high priority transportation needs in the area. Consequently, the level of authorized funding (both current and projected) available to the state and the MPO is used as the basis for financial restraint and scheduling of federally funded projects within the MPO’s jurisdiction. FDOT uses the latest project cost estimates, and the latest projected revenues based on a district-wide statutory formula to implement projects within the Collier MPO in the Work Program, and this is reflected in the TIP as well. This TIP is also constrained due to local funds from local governments’ Capital Improvement Programs committed to certain projects in the TIP. This TIP has been developed in cooperation with the FDOT. FDOT provided the MPO with estimates of available federal and state funds, as shown in the Table on the following page. The TIP is updated annually by adding a “new fifth year” which maintains a five-year rolling timeframe for the TIP. In addition to carrying forward existing projects, the MPO annually approves a set of new Transportation Project Priorities and submits these to FDOT prior to July 1st. This new set of priorities, which may be eligible for funding in the following year, is drawn from the Collier 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP). Projects are selected based on their potential to improve transportation safety and/or performance; increase capacity or relieve congestion; and preserve existing infrastructure. FDOT uses, in part, the MPO’s priorities in developing the new fifth year of the FDOT Five-Year Work Program which is also a rolling five-year program. The TIP is developed with consideration of the ten planning factors from MAP-21 and the FAST Act which are listed below. 1. Support the economic vitality of the metropolitan area, especially by enabling global competitiveness,productivity, and efficiency.2. Increase the safety of the transportation system for motorized and non-motorized users.3. Increase the security of the transportation system for the motorized and non-motorized users.4. Increase the accessibility and mobility of people and for freight.5. Protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, improve the quality of life, andpromote consistency between transportation improvements and State and local planned growth andeconomic development patterns.6. Enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system, across and between modes, forpeople and freight.7. Promote efficient system management and operation.8. Emphasize the preservation of the existing transportation system.9. Reduce or mitigate storm water impacts of surface transportation10. Enhance travel and tourism.58.B.1Packet Pg. 108Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
FUNDING SOURCES The projects identified in this TIP are funded with Federal, State, and local revenues. The FDOT Fiscal Year (FY) 2020-2024Tentative Work Program (March 6, 2018 Snapshot), which will be formally adopted on July 1, 2019, specifies revenue sources for each project. Figure 3 and Figure 4 illustrate the Collier MPO TIP’s total funding by year and total funding by mode. The total funding fluctuates from one fiscal year to another based on the phases that projects are in and the size and number of projects programmed in that year. Total funding for this TIP is $494 million, an increase of $95 million (24%) when compared to the FY2019 - FY2023 TIP. Total includes $125 million in resurfacing; $95 million on I-75 and $30 million on US41. 87471201071330204060801001201402019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24Figure 3 ‐ Total Programmed Funding (in Millions) by FDOT for the Collier MPO FY2020 ‐FY2024 TIPSource: FDOT Central Office Report(Snapshot) March 6, 201968.B.1Packet Pg. 109Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
HIGHWAY FUNDING SOURCES Surface Transportation Block Group Program (STBGP): The STBGP provides legislatively specified flexible funding that may be used by states and localities for projects on any Federal-aid eligible highway including the National Highway System (NHS), bridge projects on any public road, transit capital projects, and intra-city and inter-city bus terminals and facilities. These flexible funds are not based on a restrictive definition of program eligibility and allow local areas to choose local planning priorities. There are also flexible FTA Urban Formula Funds. STBGP funds can be used to Aviation $21M; 4%Transit $36M; 7%Planning $2M; 0%Bicycle & Pedestrian $18M; 4%Bridges $9M; 2%Congestion Management $10M; 2%Highways $235M; 48%Maintenance $163M; 33%Figure 4 ‐ Dollars (in Millions) Programmed by Mode by FDOTfor the Collier MPO FY2020 ‐FY2024 TIP78.B.1Packet Pg. 110Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
increase capacity, improve safety, relieve congestion and enhance transportation systems. The level of STBGP funding is determined by a formula. Strategic Intermodal System (SIS): Created in 2003, the SIS is a high- priority network of transportation facilities critical to Florida’s economic competitiveness and quality of life. The SIS includes the State's largest and most significant highways, commercial service airports, spaceports, waterways and deep-water seaports, rail corridors, freight rail terminals, and passenger rail and intercity bus terminals. Currently, I-75 is the only SIS facility in Collier County, however State Route 29 and State Route 82 have both been identified as highway corridors that are part of an emerging SIS network and may be designated as SIS facilities in the future. The Collier and Lee County MPOs jointly adopt regional priority lists to access SIS funds. Transportation Regional Incentive Program (TRIP): The TRIP was created pursuant to § 339.2819 and §339.155 Florida Statutes to provide an incentive for regional cooperation to leverage investments in regionally significant transportation facilities including both roads and public transportation. TRIP funds provide state matching funds for improvements identified and prioritized by regional partners which meet certain criteria. TRIP funds are used to match local or regional funds by providing up to 50% of the total project cost for public transportation projects. In-kind matches such as right-of-way donations and private funds made available to the regional partners are also allowed. The Collier MPO and Lee County MPO Boards jointly adopt regional priorities to access TRIP funds. Regional Projects: Regionally significant projects are projects that are located on the regional network (see Appendix B). FDOT may program State dedicated revenues to fund prioritized regionally significant projects. Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP): The TAP was established by MAP-21 as a new funding program pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 213(b). Eligible activities under TAP include: 1. Transportation Alternatives as defined in 23 U.S.C. 101(a)(29) and MAP-21 §1103:A. Construction, planning, and design of on-road and off-road trail facilities for pedestrians, bicyclists, and othernon- motorized forms of transportation including sidewalks, bicycle infrastructure, pedestrian and bicycle signals,traffic calming techniques, lighting and other safety-related infrastructure, and transportation projects to achievecompliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 [42 USC 12101 et seq.].88.B.1Packet Pg. 111Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
B.Construction, planning, and design of infrastructure-related projects and systems that will provide safe routesfor non-drivers including children, older adults, and individuals with disabilities to access transportation needs.C.Conversion and use of abandoned railroad corridors to trails for pedestrians, bicyclists, or other non- motorized transportation users.D.Construction of turnouts, overlooks and viewing areas.E.Community improvement activities which include butare not limited to:i.inventory, control, or removal of outdoor advertising;ii.historic preservation and rehabilitation of historictransportation facilities;iii.vegetation management practices in transportation rights-of- way to improve roadway safety, prevent against invasivespecies, and provide erosion control; andiv. archaeological activities relating to impacts fromimplementing a transportation project eligible under 23 USC.F.Any environmental mitigation activity including pollutionprevention and pollution abatement activities to:i.address stormwater management and control; waterpollution prevention or abatement related to highway constructionor due to highway runoff including activities described in 23 USC133(b)(11), 328(a) and 329;ii.reduce vehicle-caused wildlife mortality or restore and maintainconnectivity among terrestrial or aquatic habitats. 2.The recreational trails program under 23 USC 206.3.Safe Routes to School Program (SRTS) eligible projects and activities listedin the FAST Act including:A. Infrastructure-related projects.B. Non-infrastructure related activities.C. Safe Routes to School coordinator.4. Planning, designing or constructing boulevards and other roadways largely in the right-of-way of former InterstateSystem routes or other divided highways.TAP funds cannot be used for: State or MPO administrative purposes, except for SRTS administration and administrative costs of the Statepermitted Recreational Trails Program (RTP) set-aside funds.Promotional activities, except as permitted under the SRTS.98.B.1Packet Pg. 112Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
General recreation and park facilities, playground equipment, sports fields, campgrounds, picnic areas etc.Routine maintenance and operations.TRANSIT FUNDING SOURCES FDOT and the FTA both provide funding opportunities for transit and transportation disadvantaged projects through specialized programs. In addition, FHWA transfers funds to FTA which provide substantial additional funding for transit and transportation disadvantaged projects. When FHWA funds are transferred to FTA, they are transferred to FTA Urbanized Area Formula Program (§5307). According to FTA Circular 9070.1G, at a State’s discretion Surface Transportation funds may be “flexed” for transit capital projects through the Non-Urbanized Area Formula Program (§5311), and according to FTA Circular 9040.1G with certain FHWA funds to Elderlyand Persons with Disabilities Program (§5310). In urbanized areas over 200,000 inpopulation, the decision on the transfer of flexible funds is made by the MPO. Inareas under 200,000 in population, the decision is made by the MPO in cooperationwith FDOT. In rural areas, the transfer decision is made by FDOT. The decision totransfer funds flows from the transportation planning process and establishedpriorities.§5305: Metropolitan Transportation Planning Program Funds: State Departments ofTransportation sub-allocate § 5 3 0 5 formula-based program funding to MPOsincluding the Collier MPO. The program provides funding to support cooperative,continuous, and comprehensive planning for making transportation investmentdecisions in metropolitan areas as well as statewide. Funds are available for planning activities that (a) support theeconomic vitality of the metropolitan area, especially by enabling global competitiveness, productivity, and efficiency; (b)increase the safety and security of the transportation system for motorized and non-motorized users; (c) increase theaccessibility and mobility of people and freight; (d) protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation,improve the quality of life, and promote consistency between transportation improvements and State and local plannedgrowth and economic development patterns; (e) enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation systemfor people and freight across and between modes; (f) promote efficient system management and operation; and (g)emphasize preservation of the existing transportation system.§ 5307 - Urbanized Area (UZA) Formula Program Funds: The Bonita Springs (Naples) FL UZA receives an annualallocation of § 5307 funding which may be used for: (a) transit capital and operating assistance in urbanized areas; (b)transportation related planning; (c) planning, engineering, design and evaluation of transit projects; and (d) other technicaltransportation-related studies. Eligible capital investments include: (a) replacement, overhaul and rebuilding of buses; (b)108.B.1Packet Pg. 113Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
crime prevention and security equipment; (c) construction of maintenance and passenger facilities; (d) new and existing fixed guide-way systems including rolling stock and rail stations; and (e) overhaul and rebuilding of vehicles, track, signals, communications, and computer hardware and software. All preventive maintenance and some Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) complementary paratransit service costs are considered eligible capital costs. MAP-21 amended this program to include expanded eligibility for operating expenses for systems with 100 or fewer buses. Collier County receives at least $2 million dollars each year to assist in transit capital expenses. Local/State matches for §5307 consist of toll revenue credits issued by FDOT and local funds which follow FTA match guidelines. For urbanized areas with populations g r e a t e r t h a n 200,000, including Collier County, funds are apportioned and flow directly to a locally selected designated recipient. Collier County is the designated recipient for the urbanized area § 5307 funding. §5310 – Transportation for Elderly Persons and Persons with Disabilities: The Federal goal of the §5310 program is toprovide assistance in meeting the needs of elderly persons and persons with disabilities where public transit services areunavailable, insufficient or inappropriate. Funds are apportioned based on each state’s population share of these groups ofpeople. Eligible activities for §5310 funding include: (a) services developed that are beyond what is required by theAmerican’s with Disabilities Act; (b) projects that will improve access to fixed route service and/or decrease reliance byindividuals with disabilities on complementary paratransit; and (c) projects that provide an alternative to public transportationthat assists seniors and individuals with disabilities.MAP-21 apportions these funds to designated recipients based on a formula. In Florida, the §5310 Program is administered by FDOT on behalf of FTA with funding allocated to the Bonita Springs (Naples) Urbanized Area. Projects selected must be included in a locally developed, coordinated public transit human services transportation plan. FDOT calls for § 5310 applications annually and awards funds through a competitive process. § 5311 - Rural Area Formula Grant: This program (49 U.S.C. 5311) provides formula funding to states to support publictransportation in areas with populations less than 50,000. Program funds are apportioned to each state based on aformula that uses land area, population and transit service. According to Federal program rules, program funds may beused for capital operating, state administration, and project administration expenses; however, Florida allows eligiblecapital and operating expenses.In Florida, the §5311 Program is administered by FDOT. Program funds are distributed to each FDOT district office based on its percentage of the state’s rural population. Each district office allocates program funds to designated eligible recipients through an annual grant application process. §5311 funds in Collier County are used to provide fixed route service to rural areas such as Immokalee and Golden Gate Estates. §5339 – Bus and Bus Facilities Funds: This program makes federal resources available to state and direct recipientsto replace, rehabilitate and purchase buses and related equipment, and to construct bus-related facilities including118.B.1Packet Pg. 114Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
technological changes or innovations to modify low or no emission vehicles or facilities. Funding is provided through formula allocations and competitive grants. A sub-program provides competitive grants for bus and bus facility projects that support low and zero-emission vehicles. Eligible recipients include direct recipients that operate fixed route bus service or that allocate funding to fixed route bus operators; state or local governmental entities; and federally recognized Native American tribes that operate fixed route bus service that are eligible to receive direct grants under §5307 and §5311 - Transportation Disadvantaged Program Funds: Chapter 427, Florida Statutes, established theFlorida Commission for the Transportation Disadvantaged (CTD) with the responsibility to coordinate transportationservices provided to the transportation disadvantaged through the Florida Coordinated Transportation System. The CTDalso administers the Transportation Disadvantaged Trust Fund. Transportation disadvantaged individuals are those whocannot obtain their own transportation due to disability, age, or income.The Collier MPO, through the Local Coordinating Board (LCB), identifies local service needs and provides information, advice and direction to the Community Transportation Coordinator (CTC) on the coordination of services to be provided to the transportation disadvantaged [Chapter 427, Florida Statutes]. The Collier County Board of County Commissioners (BCC) is designated as the CTC for Collier County and is responsible for ensuring that coordinated transportation services are provided to the transportation disadvantaged population of Collier County. Public Transit Block Grant Program: The Public Transit Block Grant Program was established by the Florida Legislature to provide a stable source of funding for public transit [341.052 Florida Statutes]. Specific program guidelines are provided in FDOT Procedure Topic Number 725-030-030. Funds are awarded by FDOT to those public transit providers eligible to receive funding from FTA’s §5307 and §5311 programs and to Community Transportation Coordinators. Public Transit Block Grant funds may be used for eligible capital and operating costs of providing public transit service. Program funds may also be used for transit service development and transit corridor projects. Public Transit Block Grant projects must be consistent with applicable approved local government comprehensive plans. Public Transit Service Development Program: The Public Transit Service Development Program was enacted by the Florida Legislature to provide initial funding for special projects [341Florida Statutes]. Specific program guidelines are provided in FDOT Procedure Topic Number 725-030-005. The program is selectively applied to determine whether new or innovative techniques or measures could be used to improve or expand public transit services. Service Development Projects specifically include projects involving the use of new technologies for services, routes or vehicle frequencies; the purchase of special transportation services; and other such techniques for increasing service to the riding public. Projects involving the application of new technologies or methods for improving operations, maintenance, and marketing in public transit systems are also eligible for Service Development Program funding. Service Development projects are subject to specified times of duration with a maximum of three years. If determined to be successful, Service Development Projects must be continued by the public transit provider without additional Public Transit Service Development Program Funds. 128.B.1Packet Pg. 115Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
ADDRESSING PERFORMANCE MEASURES AND TARGETS Performance Management is a strategic approach to connect investment and policy decisions to help achieve performance goals. Performance measures are quantitative criteria used to evaluate progress. Performance measures targets are the benchmarks against which collected data is gauged. The Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21) requires State DOTs and MPOs to conduct performance-based planning by tracking performance measures and setting data-driven targets to improve those measures. Performance-based planning ensures the most efficient investment of federal transportation funds by increasing accountability, transparency, and providing for better investment decisions that focus on key outcomes related to seven national goals: Improving Safety;Maintaining Infrastructure Condition;Reducing Traffic Congestion;Improving the Efficiency of the System and Freight Movement;Protecting the Environment; and,Reducing Delays in Project Delivery.The Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act supplements the MAP-21 legislation by establishing timelines for State DOTs and MPOs to comply with the requirements of MAP-21. State DOTs are required to establish statewide targets and MPOs have the option to support the statewide targets or adopt their own. On November 9, 2018, the MPO adopted the Performance Measures Targets set by FDOT; the measures and targets are briefly listed below. Performance Measures Targets must be adopted every four years except for the safety performance measure targets which must be annually adopted. The MPO will continue to coordinate with FDOT and transit providers in the performance management process as it becomes an on- going part of the transportation planning process. On November 9, 2018 the MPO Board adopted the performance measures and targets shown on the next page. 138.B.1Packet Pg. 116Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
148.B.1Packet Pg. 117Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
Safety The MPO adopted the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) statewide safety performance measure targets which includes Vision Zero. The MPO supports the achievement of the FDOT Vision Zero safety targets by assessing the performance of the transportation system and linking investment priorities to the achievement of targets in the Long-Range Transportation Plan and Transportation Improvement Program. On February 9, 2018, the MPO adopted the safety targets listed below: Fatalities; 0Serious Injuries; 0Nonmotorized Fatalities and Serious Injuries; 0Rate of Fatalities per 100M Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT); 0Rate of Serious Injuries per 100M VMT; 0.Projects that will help the MPO achieve this performance measure target include: Widening SR 29 and SR 82 will make it safer for cars to pass each other without entering the oncoming traffic lane. SR 82 has had multiple traffic fatalities. FPN 4308481; SR 82 from Hendry County Line to Gator Slough Lane; add lanes andreconstructFPN 4308491; SR 82 from Gator Slough Lane to SR 29; Add lanes and reconstructFPN 4175402, 4175403, 4175404, 4175405, 4175406, 4178784; SR 29 from Oil Well Road toHendry County Line; Add lanes and reconstructProviding sidewalks has been shown to reduce pedestrian crashes compared to walking in the roadway. Four of the projects listed below are on roads where there have been a significant number of pedestrian and bicycle crashes. The following projects were identified either in the 2012 Comprehensive Pathways Plan or by MPO member entities. FPN 4350291; US 41 from CF 846 (111th ST) to N of 91st Ave; add sidewalk on east side and 3 bussheltersFPN 4351101; CR 887 (old US 41) from US 41 to Lee County Line; PD&E/EMO StudyFPN 4380921; Vanderbilt Dr (CR 901) from Vanderbilt Beach Rd to 109th Ave N; sidewalkFPN 4433753; Collier County Lake Trafford Rd; Sidewalk and bike LanesFPN 4433754; Collier County Lake Trafford Rd; Sidewalk and bike lanesFPN 4418461; 111th Ave N from Bluebill Ave Bridge to 7th St N; Bike lane/sidewalkFPN 4390021; SR29 from N 1st St to N 9th St; Pedestrian Safety ImprovementFPN 4418781; Bald Eagle Dr from Collier Blvd to Old Marco Ln, Sidewalk158.B.1Packet Pg. 118Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
FPN 4380911; County Barn Rd from Rattlesnake Hammock to SR84 (Davis Blvd); Bike path/trail FPN 4369701; CR92 (San Marco Rd) from S Barfield Dr to Vintage Bay; Bike path/trail FPN 4380931; Green Blvd from Santa Barbara Blvd to Sunshine Blvd; Bike lane/sidewalk FPN 4418791; Inlet Dr from Addison Ct to Travida Terr; Sidewalk FPN 4404361; Mandarin Greenway; Sidewalks at various locations FPN 4331891; N Collier Blvd from E Elkcam Cir to Buttonwood Ct; Sidewalk FPN 4404381; San Marco Rd. from Vintage Bay Drive to Goodland Rd; Bike Path / Trail FPN 4370961; From southern limits on Copeland Ave to NE Broadway and Copeland Ave; Sidewalk FPN 4404371; South Golf Dr from Gulf Shore Blvd to W US41; Sidewalk FPN 4371851; Naples Beach Access Sidewalks at Various Locations; Sidewalk FPN 4414801; Eden Park Elementary; Sidewalk A significant number of people in Immokalee walk as a means of transportation. The Eden Park Elementary School project will provide sidewalks for children walking to school where none currently exist. The SR 29 project, also called Main Street, is a main pedestrian thoroughfare for people walking to and from work, shopping and other everyday activities. FPN 4390021; SR 29 (Main St) from N 1st St to N 9th St; Pedestrian safety improvement FPN 4414801; Eden Park Elementary Safe Routes to Schools; Sidewalks Other projects that will help the MPO achieve this performance measure target are: FPN 4380591; US41 (SR90) from E of SR84 (Davis Blvd) to Courthouse Shadows; Resurfacing project has had $1.5 million of safety improvements added to it largely as a result of a FDOT Road Safety Audit (RSA). FPN 4336321; Immokalee Regional Airport security enhancements FPN 4416751; Naples Municipal Airport security upgrades FPN 4351112, SR951 from Manatee Rd to N of Tower Rd; Add lanes and rehabilitate pavement FPN 4258432; I-75 @ SR951 Interchange; Interchange improvement FPN 4419751; US41 (SR90) @ Oasis Visitor Center; Add left turn lanes FPN 4404411; Airport Rd from Vanderbilt Rd to Immokalee Rd; Add thru lanes FPN 4258432; I-75 @ Collier; Interchange Improvement FPN 4452961; I-75 @ Pine Ridge; PD$E / EMO Study 168.B.1Packet Pg. 119Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
Pavement and Bridge Condition This measure applies only to roads and bridges on the National Highway System (NHS) which includes I-75, SR29, and US41 in Collier County. Targets are: NHS Interstate Pavements: at least 60% of pavement in good condition and 5% or less in poor condition within five-years; for NHS non-Interstate Pavements: at least 40% of pavement in good condition in two and four years, and 5% or less in poor condition within five-years Bridges: at least 50% of bridges in good condition in two and four years, and 10% or less in poor condition in two and four years Projects that will help the MPO achieve these performance measure targets are: FPN 4258432; I-75 @ Collier; Interchange improvement FPN 4175402-4175406 SR29 from Oil Well Rd to north of SR82; Add lanes and reconstruct FPN 4178784; SR29 from SR82 to Hendry County Line; Add lanes and reconstruct FPN 4415611; US41 (SR90) from Whistler’s Cove to Collier Blvd; resurfacing FPN 4415121; US41 (SR44) from S of Dunruss Creek to S of Gulf Park Dr; resurfacing FPN 4380591; US41 (SR90) from E of SR84 (Davis Blvd) to Courthouse Shadows; resurfacing FPN 4440081; I-75 (SR93) from Broward County Line to toll booth; resurfacing FPN 4395551; SR951 from Judge Jolley Bridge to Fiddlers Creek Parkway; resurfacing System Performance This measure applies only to roads and bridges on the National Highway System (NHS) which includes I-75, SR29, and US41 in Collier County. Targets are: 75% of person miles on interstate are reliable in two years, and 70% in four years 50% of person miles on non-interstate are reliable in four years Truck Travel Time Reliability Ratio on Interstate of 1.75 in two years and 2.0 in four years Projects that will help the MPO achieve this performance measure target are: FPN 4258432; I-75 @ SR951; Interchange improvement FPN 4452961; I-75 @ Pine Ridge; PD&E / EMO Study FPN 4175402-4175406 SR29 from Oil Well Rd to north of SR82; Add lanes and reconstruct FPN 4178784; SR29 from SR82 to Hendry County Line; Add lanes and reconstruct 178.B.1Packet Pg. 120Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
Transit Asset Management The MPO adopted the Transit Assets Management Performance Measures and Targets that were adopted by the Collier County Board of County Commissioners. The targets are: 10% or less of Transit Rolling Stock (all revenue vehicles) have met or exceeded their Useful Life Benchmark(ULB)25% or less of Transit Equipment (non-revenue vehicles) have met or exceeded their Useful Life Benchmark(ULB)25% or more of Transit Facilities (all buildings and structures) have a condition rating of less than three (3) in theFTA Transit Economic Requirements Model (TERM) Projects that will help the MPO achieve this performance measure target are: FPN 4101461; FTA §5307 Capital AssistanceFPN 4340301; FTA §5339 Capital AssistanceFreight, Asset Management, Transit-State of Good Repair Although performance measures targets for the FDOT’s Freight and Asset Management Plans have not been set, the TIP includes specific investment priorities that support all the MPO’s goals including freight, modal options, and using a prioritization and project selection process established in the LRTP. The MPO will continue to coordinate with FDOT and take action on the additional targets and other requirements of the federal performance management process. Projects that will help the MPO increase freight performance include: FPN 4175402; 4175403, 4175404, 417540, 417540, 4178784; SR29 from Oil Well Rd to Hendry Co Line; Addlanes and reconstructFPN 4258432; I-75 @ SR951; Interchange improvement188.B.1Packet Pg. 121Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
2018 MPO PROJECT PRIORITY AND PROJECT SELECTION PROCESSES The method to select projects for inclusion in the TIP depends on whether the metropolitan area has a population of 200,000 or greater. Metropolitan areas with populations greater than 200,000 are called Transportation Management Areas (TMA). The Collier MPO is a TMA. In a TMA, the MPO selects many of the Title 23 and FTA funded projects for implementation in consultation with FDOT and local transit operators. Projects on the National Highway System (NHS) and projects funded under the bridge maintenance and interstate maintenance programs are selected by FDOT in cooperation with the MPO. Federal Lands Highway Program projects are selected by the respective federal agency in cooperation with FDOT and the MPO [23 C.F.R. 450.330(c)]. FDOT coordinates with the MPO to ensure that projects are also consistent with MPO priorities. Federal and State transportation programs help the Collier MPO complete transportation projects which are divided into several categories including: highway (including maintenance), transit, sidewalk/bicycle paths and/or facilities, congestion management, bridges, planning, and aviation. Many of these projects require multiple phases which must be completed in order. Project phases may include: Project Development & Environment studies (PD&E), Preliminary Engineering (PE), Right-of-Way acquisition (ROW), Railroads and Utilities (RRU) and Construction (CST). Some phases may require multi- year efforts to complete, therefore it is often necessary to prioritize only one or two phases of a project within a TIP with the next phase(s) being included in subsequent TIPs. All projects in this TIP must be consistent with the Collier MPO 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) adopted on December 11, 2015. Projects were included in the LRTP based on their potential to improve the safety and/or performance of a facility; increase capacity or relieve congestion; and preserve existing transportation investments. TIP projects are also consistent, to the extent feasible, with the Capital Improvement Programs and Comprehensive Plans of Collier County, the City of Naples, the City of Marco Island, and the City of Everglades as well as the Master Plans of the Collier County Airport Authority and the Naples Airport Authority. With minor exceptions, projects in the TIP must also be included in the FDOT Five-Year Work Program (WP) and the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP). The MPO’s 2018 Transportation Project Priorities, for inclusion in the FY2020 – FY2024 TIP, were adopted by the MPO Board on May 11, 2018 and June 8, 2018 and are discussed below. The MPO and FDOT annually update the TIP, FDOT Work Program (WP) and STIP by adding a “new fifth year” which maintains the programs as rolling five-year programs. FDOT coordinates this process with the MPO to ensure that projects are consistent with MPO priorities. During each spring/summer, the MPO prioritizes projects derived from its adopted LRTP and based on the MPO’s annual allocation of Federal Surface Transportation Block Group Program (STBGP) funds, State Transportation Trust Funds and other funding programs. The MPO’s list of prioritized projects is formally reviewed by the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC), Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC), Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC), and Congestion Management Committee (CMC), and is approved by the MPO Board before being transmitted to FDOT for funding consideration. (See 198.B.1Packet Pg. 122Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
Appendix I for a description of the criteria used for project prioritization.) The list of prioritized projects includes highway, sidewalk/bicycle paths and/or facilities, congestion management, bridge and transit projects which are illustrated on the following pages. All projects funded through the FDOT Work Program are included in Part I of this TIP. Table 1 shows the general timeframe for the MPO’s establishment of project priorities and the development of the FY2020 – FY2024 TIP. Safety has always been an important part of the MPO’s project prioritization process. Safety criteria are included in the prioritization process for bicycle and pedestrian, congestion management and bridge priorities. Highway and SIS priorities are generated by the Long Range Transportation Plan which emphasizes safety. As the MPO develops new lists of project priorities, the new federal performance measures will be incorporated into the criteria. An early example of this can be seen in the development of the MPO’s Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan where the weight of the safety criteria is being significantly increased and will be the most heavily weighted criteria for evaluating potential projects. Table 1 – General Timeframe for FY2020-2024 TIP Process January - March 2018 MPO solicits candidate projects for potential funding in FY2020 - FY2024 TIP. June 2018 MPO adopts prioritized list of projects for funding in the MPO FY2020- FY2024 TIP. November 2018 – January 2019 FDOT releases its Tentative Five-year Work Program for FY2020 - FY2024March – June 2019 MPO produces draft FY2020 - 2024 TIPMPO Board and committees review draft TIPMPO advisory committees endorse TIPJune 2019 MPO adopts FY2020 – FY2024 TIP which is derived fromFDOT’s Tentative Five-year Work Program.MPO adopts prioritized list of projects for funding in theFY2021 - FY2025 TIP.July 2019 FDOT’s Five-Year Work Program FY2020 - FY2024 (which includes the MPO TIP) is adopted and goes into effect. September 2019 MPO adopts TIP Amendment for inclusion of Roll Forward Report 208.B.1Packet Pg. 123Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
2018 HIGHWAY PRIORITIES The highway priorities list is consistent with the Collier 2040 LRTP Cost Feasible Plan. The 2018 Highway Related Priorities (Table 2) were approved by the MPO Board on May 11, 2018. The list was forwarded to FDOT for consideration of future funding. Table 2 – 2018 Highway Priorities Phase Source YOE CostPE OA $590,000CST OA $2,540,000PE OA $800,000CST OA $6,350,000PE OA $3,600,000CST OA $38,100,000PE OA $510,000CST OA $3,490,00012Old US 41 US 41 (SR 45)Lee/Collier County lineAdd Lanes and Reconstruct 1.5 $15,030,000 2026‐2030 PE OA $2,720,00019aCritical Needs Intersection (Randall Blvd at Immokalee Rd)Immokalee Rd 8th StreetInterim At‐Grade Improvements, including 4 laning 8th Street$4,000,000 2021‐2025 CST OA $5,080,000PE OA $370,000CST OA $2,542,00041SR 951 (Collier Blvd)South of Manatee RdNorth of Tower Rd 4 to 6 lane roadway 1 $13,350,000 2026‐2030 PE OA $2,020,000Funding Status Notes per LRTP Priority Ranking2‐ FDOT conducting "interim" solution study in‐house3‐ FDOT conducting "interim" solution study in‐house7‐ FDOT conducting "interim" solution study in‐house12 ‐ PD&E #4351101; SU $838,297 FY19; SU $1,170,000 FY2019a ‐ Randall Corridor Study County Local Funds $XXX FY19$2,000,000 2021‐2025 $2,912,000$22,050,00021US 41 Goodlette Rd N/A Intersection Improvements$5,080,0002.0 $30,000,000 2021‐2025 $41,700,0007Immokalee Rd I‐75 Interchange I‐75 InterchangeIntersection Traffic Signalization$2,750,000 2021‐2025 $4,000,0005CR 951 (Collier Blvd)Golden Gate CanalGreen Blvd 4 to 6 lane roadway2021‐2025 $7,150,000Total Project Cost (PDC)2021‐2025 $3,130,0002021‐25Construction Time Frame5‐Year Window in which CST is Funded by SourceI‐75 Interchange I‐75 InterchangeEastbound on‐ramp ‐ New 2 lane Ramp$2,000,000 Final Proposed Improvement ‐ 2040 LRTPLink in Miles Facility Limit From Limit ToLRTP Priority RankingIntersection Traffic Signalization$5,000,000 3Pine Ridge Rd I‐75 InterchangeProjects Funded in CFP YOEI‐75 Interchange2Golden Gate Parkway218.B.1Packet Pg. 124Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
2018 SIS PRIORITIES (for Collier and Lee County MPOs) In addition to the highway priorities listed above, the MPO forwards two lists of projects on the Strategic Intermodal System (SIS) network to FDOT for consideration of future funding. The SIS network includes highways, airports, spaceports, deep water seaports, freight rail terminals, passenger rail, intercity bus terminals, rail corridors and waterways that are considered the largest and most significant commercial transportation facilities in the state. Presently, I-75 is the only SIS facility in Collier County. Two other facilities in Collier County, State Route 82 (SR82) and State Route 29 (SR29), are on the “emerging” SIS network”. “Emerging” SIS facilities are usually located in, or connect to, fast growing areas. They normally have lower current volumes of people and freight but have the potential for significant future growth. Should this growth occur, these facilities may be elevated to the SIS network. Emerging SIS facilities are fully eligible for FDOT SIS funding but are categorized separately to encourage proactive planning. Table 3A and Table 3B illustrate the 2018 SIS Priorities for both the Collier MPO (adopted by the MPO Board on June 8, 2018) and the Lee County MPO Board. The Collier MPO SIS Priorities are consistent with the Collier 2040 LRTP. 228.B.1Packet Pg. 125Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
Table 3A Joint Collier/Lee County MPO Mainline SIS Priorities Adopted by Collier MPO June 8, 2018, Lee County MPO June 22, 2018 2012 Priority 2017 Priority Project From To Improvement Type Next Phase Volume Capacity V/C 20 1 1 SR 82 Hendry County Line Gator Slough 2 - 4L CST 12,000 16,400 0.73 10 2 2 SR 29 Loop Rd SR 29 (South) SR 29 (North) New 4L ROW New 41,700 23 3 SR 29 New Market Road North SR 82 2-4LROW 16,450 16,400 1.00 NA 4 I-75 Pine Ridge Road SR 82 6L - 8 Aux Lns PD&E 100,500 111,800 0.90 7 5 SR 80 SR 31 Buckingham Rd 4-6L PD&E 35,000 41,700 0.84 24 6 SR 29 9th St North Immokalee Dr 2-4LPE 16,000 19,514 0.82 12 7 SR 29 Immokalee Dr New Market Rd North 2-4L ROW 15,900 19,514 0.81 NA 8 3 SR 31 SR 80 SR 78 2 - 4L PD&E 11,100 17,700 0.63 26 9 SR 29 Oil Well Rd South of Agrucultural Way 2-4L PE 5,000 8,400 0.59 25 10 SR 29 South of Agricultural Way CR 846 East 2-4L ROW 7,100 19,514 0.43 26 11 SR 29 I 75 Oil Well Rd 2-4L PE 3,200 8,400 0.38 13 12 I 75 Pine Ridge Rd SR 80 6-10L PD&E 100,500 111,800 0.90 Notes 1. Joint Board #1 Priority2. Will improve other SR29 needs 3. Includes bridge Phase Abbreviations: CST construction; ROW right-of-way; PD&E project development and environmental; PE preliminary engineering 238.B.1Packet Pg. 126Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
Table 3B Joint Collier/Lee County MPO Interchange SIS Priorities Adopted by Collier MPO June 8, 2018, Lee County MPO June 22, 2018 Project Interchange Improvement Type Next Unprogrammed Phase Notes I 75 @ Everglades Blvd New Interchange IJR I 75 @ Golden Gate Pkwy Minor Interchange Improvements Study Short Term I 75 @ Pine Ridge Rd Minor interchange improvements Study Short Term I 75 @ Immokalee Rd Major interchange improvements PD&E Short Term I 75 @ Bonita Beach Rd Major interchange improvements PE Mid Term I 75 @ Corksrew Rd Major interchange improvements PE Short Term I 75 @ Daniels Pkwy Minor Interchange Improvements Study Short Term I 75 @ SR 82 Major interchange improvements PE Long Term I 75 @Luckett Rd Major interchange improvements PE Long Term I 75 @ SR 78 Minor interchange improvements PE Short Term I 75 @ Del Prado Ext. New Interchange IJR Notes to Table 3B Short Term - Current to 2025 Mid Term - 2025-2035 Long Term - 2035-2045 Minor Interchange Improvement - Add additional turn lanes, operational improvements Major Interchange Improvement - Rebuild to accommodate future 10-lane cross section Phase Abbreviations: IJR Interchange Justification Report; PE Preliminary Engineering 248.B.1Packet Pg. 127Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
2018 BRIDGE PRIORITIES Bridge related priorities are consistent with the 2040 LRTP. The 2018 Bridge Related Priorities (Table 4) were approved by the MPO Board on May 11, 2018 and forwarded to FDOT for consideration of future funding. The cost of each new bridge is estimated at $8 million. Table 4 – 2018 Bridge Priorities RankLocationProposed ImprovementCost Estimat116th Street NE, south of 10th Avenue NENew Bridge Construction $8,000,0002 47th Avenue NE, west of Everglades BoulevardNew Bridge Construction $8,000,0003Wilson Boulevard, South of 33rd Avenue NENew Bridge Construction $8,000,0004 18th Ave NE, between Wilson Blvd N and 8th St NENew Bridge Construction $8,000,0005 18th Ave NE, between 8th St NE and 16th St NENew Bridge Construction $8,000,0006 13th St NW, north end proposed Vanderbilt Beach Rd ExtNew Bridge Construction $8,000,0007 16th Street SE, south endNew Bridge Construction $8,000,0008 Wilson Boulevard South, south endNew Bridge Construction $8,000,0009Location TBD, between 10th Ave SE and 20th Ave SENew Bridge Construction $8,000,0001062nd Avenue NE, west of 40th Street NENew Bridge Construction $8,000,000StatusPD&E completedPD&E completed258.B.1Packet Pg. 128Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
2018 TRANSIT PRIORITIES Florida State Statutes require each transit provider in Florida that receives State Transit Block Grant funding to prepare an annual Transit Development Plan (TDP). The TDP is a ten-year plan for Collier Area Transit (CAT) that provides a review of existing transportation services and a trend analysis of these services. Table 5 shows the 2018 Transit Priorities which were approved by the MPO Board on May 11, 2018 and submitted to FDOT for consideration of future funding. Table 5 - Transit Priorities 2018 1 $200,000Collier CountyEnhance accesibility to bus stops to meet Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements (10/Year) 2 $480,000Collier CountyConstruction of bus shelters & amenities (bike rack, bench, trash can, etc.) 12/Year3 $396,000*** US41 at Lee County LineRequired Environmental & Design Phases for future construction of a Park and Ride Facility 4 $396,000***Collier Blvd and Immokalee RdRequired Environmental & Design Phases for future construction of a Park and Ride Facility at the intersection5 $2,520,180**Collier CountyExtended Service Hours on exisitng routes ‐ 1 additional run ‐ 7 days a week.6 $3,686,400** US41 & Airport RdReduce headways to 30 minutes during peak hours on routes 11 & 127 $1,339,400**Collier CountyLee/Collier Connection8 $2,887,200**Golden Gate City & East NaplesReduce headways to 45 minutes during peak hours on routes 15, 17 & 249 $1,476,900** Central Naples & BayshoreReduce headways to 30 minutes during peak hours on routes 13 & 1410 $1,004,538** Golden Gate Estates Implement Flex Service for the Golden Gate Estates area** Includes cost for 3 years based on existing routes costs, this cost does not include bus purchase.*** Cost estimate does not include right‐of‐way acquisition or construction.LocationDescriptionRankRequested Funding/ Project Estimates268.B.1Packet Pg. 129Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
2018 CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PRIORITIES Transportation Management Areas (urbanized areas with populations over 200,000) are required by 23 USC 134 (k)(3) to have a Congestion Management Process (CMP) that provides for the effective and systematic management and operation of new and existing facilities by using travel demand reductions and operational management strategies. CMP projects that are eligible for Federal and state funding include sidewalk/bicycle paths and/or facilities and congestion management projects that alleviate congestion, do not require the acquisition of right-of-way and demonstrate quantifiable performance measures. Current MPO Board policy for the allocation of TMA funds (“Box Funds”) states that congestion management priorities will receive 100% of the TMA allocation in 2019**. The Congestion Management Committee (CMC) used the Transportation System Performance Report (not yet complete) as a guide to prioritize projects. The 2019 Congestion Management Priorities is a new list of priorities and are shown in Table 5. The 2018 congestion management priorities list contained three remaining projects. One project has been funded; one project was no longer needed to relocation of an existing facility; and one project has been removed due to one agency not wishing to consolidate operations. The 2019 Congestion Management Priorities are a new list of priorities. 278.B.1Packet Pg. 130Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
Table 6 – 2018 Congestion Management Priorities Rank Project NameProject DescriptionRequested funding (estimate)Total Project CostSubmitting Agency/ JurisdictionProject Status1Traffic Operations Center Consolidation StudyProject to study the existing conditions for the City of Naples TOC and Collier County TOC and evaluate the advantages and disadvantages for consolidation$250,000 $350,000 City of NaplesStudy completed using State funds2Collier County Traffic Management Center ExpansionConstruct a new two‐story, 4500 sq. ft. freestanding building to house the new Traffic Management Center$3,611,000 $3,611,000 Collier County Traffic OpsUnfunded3New Video Wall for Traffic Control CenterProvide 12 ‐ 48" monitors, 3 ‐ 30' cables for monitors, 3 servers and new video software for City's traffic operations center$400,000 $400,000 City of NaplesPartially completed with State funds288.B.1Packet Pg. 131Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
BICYCLE and PEDESTRIAN PRIORITIES The 2018 Bicycle and Pedestrian Project Priorities were derived from the 2012 Collier MPO Comprehensive Pathways Plan. Future Bicycle and Pedestrian Priorities will be derived from the Collier MPO Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan which replaced the 2012 Plan. The two plans share a similar vision of providing a safe, connected and convenient on-road and off-road network throughout the Collier MPA to accommodate bicyclists and pedestrians as well as a similar goal of improving transportation efficiency and enhancing the health and fitness of the community while allowing for more transportation choices. After approval by the MPO Board on May 11, 2018, the list was sent to FDOT for consideration of future funding and is shown in Table 7. Table 7 – 2018 Bicycle and Pedestrian Priorities Rank Project NameProject DescriptionLimit FromLimit ToAmount RequestedSubmitting Agency/ JurisdictionPhase/Amount Funded in Work ProgramFPN 1 County Barn Rd10' Shared Use Path ‐ west sideDavis BlvdRattlesnake Hammock Rd$1,411,482 Collier County PE $176,000 CST $1,879,37643809112 Vanderbilt DriveSidewalk and crosswalk VBR & 109th Ave North 109th Ave. North & 111th Ave North$272,248 Collier County PE $151,000 CST $709,07543809213 Green Blvd5' Bike Lanes ‐ both sides Santa Barbara Blvd Sunshine Blvd $567,750 Collier County PE $279,363 CST $709,075 43809315 S. Golf Dr5' sidewalks, crosswalks, bike lanes, parking on N side500' West of US 41 & 7th St N7th St. N. & '400 east of Gulf Shore Blvd N$880,000 City of Naples PE $279,363 44043716 Pine Ridge Road6' sidewalk ‐ south side Whippoorwill Lane Napa Blvd$561,800 Collier County PE $229,418 44042517 111th Ave N5' bike lanes/paved shoulders‐both sidesU.S. 41East of Bluebill Bridge $480,000 Collier County PE $64,740 44184618 Mandarin Greenway Sidewalk LoopSidewalks Banyan Blvd & on Pine CtOrchid Dr$299,500 City of Naples PE $45,311 CST $349,40744043619 Bald Eagle Dr8' Shared Use Pathway ‐ west sideCollier Blvd.Old Marco Lane $344,030 City of Marco IslandPE $36,000 441878110 Everglades City ‐ Copeland Ave SSidewalksTraffic Circle by Everglades City HallChokoloskee Bay Causeway$410,000 Everglades City PE $235,000 CST $590,391437096111 Lake Trafford Rd6' SidewalksCarson Rd Laurel St $492,800 Collier County PE $71,209 441845212 Inlet Dr. ‐ Addison Court Pathway8' Shared Use Pathway ‐ east and south side Travida Terr. Along Addison CtLee Ct. $299,707 City of Marco IslandPE $31,000 441879113 Lake Trafford Rd5' Bike LanesLittle League Rd Laurel St $780,500 Collier County PE $92,245 441845114 Immokalee Rd10' Shared Use Pathway on north sideStrand BlvdNorthbrooke Dr $1,209,219 Collier County298.B.1Packet Pg. 132Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
REGIONAL PRIORITIES – TRANSPORTATION REGIONAL INCENTIVE PROGRAM (TRIP) and REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVE PROGRAM (RTAP) In addition to local MPO priorities, the Collier MPO coordinates with the Lee County MPO to set regional priorities for Transportation Regional Incentive Program (TRIP) and Regional Transportation Alternatives Program (RTAP) funding. TRIP and RTAP are discretionary programs that fund regional projects prioritized by the two MPOs. The Lee County and Collier MPOs entered into an Interlocal Agreement by which they set policies for the regional networks and prioritize regional projects to utilize available regional funding. The approved RTAP and TRIP priorities are shown below in Table 8 and Table 9 and were submitted to FDOT for consideration of future funding. A set of regional maps is included in Appendix B. Table 8 – 2018 Collier MPO RTAP Regional Pathway Priorities Adopted by Collier MPO June 8, 2018 2017 Rank Roadway/ Project Project Limits Length Proposed Improvements Program med Phase Next Unfunded Phase Requested Funds Local Match Total Cost 1 SR 80 Buckingham Rd to Werner Dr1 2.04 Mile SUP (South Side) NA PE + CST $1,938,608 $ - $1,938,608 2 Daniels Pkwy West of Commerce Lakes Drive 2.50 Mile SUP (North Side) NA PD&E $ 269,317 $ - $ 269,317 3 Gladiolus Dr Maida Lane to US 41 1.09 Mile SUP (South Side) NA PD&E $ 284,424 $ - $ 284,424 4 Estero Blvd Hickory Blvd to Big Carlos Bridge 3.62 Mile SUP (West Side) NA PD&E $ 297,230 $ - $ 297,230 Notes: Cost estimates to be refined or developed. Costs based on FDOT provided unit cost for 12' Shared Use Path Funding source is FDOT portion of 'any area' Transportation Alternative Program funds LC School District has identified this segment as a hazardous walking location. As per Gabby's Law for Student Safety Act, school district identified hazardous walking locations on state highways should be corrected by FDOT by adding a project in its 5-year work program. Considering this is an expensive project FDOT can consider staging the construction. Rank 308.B.1Packet Pg. 133Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
Table 9 - 2018 Joint Collier/Lee County MPO TRIP Priorities Adopted by Collier MPO on June 8, 2018, Lee County MPO June 22, 2018 SponsorRouteFromToProposed ImprovementRequested PhaseTotal CostRequested TRIP FundsStaff Priority OrderState Funding LevelFiscal YearTotal PointsCollier CountyCollier BlvdGolden Gate Main Canal Golden Gate Pkwy4L to 6L ROW $2,469,440 $1,234,720#123Cape CoralChiquita BlvdSouth of Cape CoralPkwyNorth of SR 784L to 6L ROW $30,000,000 $4,000,000#221LeeTranFacility and NewService RouteCST $3,000,000 $1,500,000#319Lee CountyBurnt Store RdSR 78Tropicana Pkwy2L to 4L CST $7,700,000 $3,850,000#1$2,962,302FY 19/2021Lee CountyEstero BlvdSegment 3Road Upgrade CST $7,750,000 $3,875,000#215LeeTranFacilityCST $1,000,000 $500,000#314Fort M yersHanson StreetVeronica ShoemakerOrtiz Ave.New 2L CST $12,000,000 $4,000,000#126Collier County Golden Gate Blvd20th StreetEverglades Blvd2L to 4L CST $24,300,000 $12,150,000#220Collier CountyVanderbilt Beach RdUS 41E. of Goodlette4L to 6L CST $8,428,875 $4,214,438#320Collier CountyIntersection CST $ 5,953,200 $ 2,976,600#124Collier CountyIntersection CST $7,304,968 $3,652,484#223Lee CountyThree Oaks Ext.North of Alico RoadNew 4L CST $47,000,000 $7,000,000#320Lee CountyEstero BlvdSouth SegmentRoad Upgrade CST $7,750,000 $3,875,000Funded$ 2,651,966FY 20/2115Collier County Oil Well RoadEvergladesOil Well Grade Rd.2L to 6LCST $ 31,400,000 $ 15,700,000#124Lee CountyCorkscrew RoadE.of Ben Hill GriffinBella Terra2L to 4L CST $12,000,000 $6,000,000#221Lee CountyOrtizColonial BlvdSR 822L to 4L CST $13,950,000 $6,975,000#321Collier County Veterans Memorial Blvd. Livingston RoadOld US41 New 2 Lane facility CST $ 10,199,433 $ 5,099,716#120Immokalee at Randal Interim Intersection ImprovementsPine Ridge at Livingston Road Intersection Improvements2021/20222022/20232017/2018Regional Transfer Facility and Connector2018/2019LeeTran Capital Expenditures for Passenger Amenities, Bus Pull- Outs, and pavement markings2019/20202020/2021318.B.1Packet Pg. 134Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
Major Projects Implemented or Delayed from the Previous TIP (FY2019 – FY2023) 23 CFR §450.324(2) requires MPOs to list major projects from the previous TIP that were implemented and to identify any significant delays in the planned implementation of major projects. The Collier MPO TIP identifies major projects as a multi-laning or a new facility type capacity improvement. The following list provides the status of the major projects that were identified as such in the FY2019 – FY2023 TIP. Major Projects Implemented/Completed No multi-laning or new facility capacity improvement projects were scheduled for completion of construction phase.Major Projects Significantly Delayed, Reason for Delay and Revised Schedule SR82 from Gator Slough to SR 29; FPN 4308491; Add lanes and reconstruction; $34 million project; CST ($34million) moved from FY2019 to FY2020I-75 @ SR951; FPN 4258432; Major interchange improvement; $108 million project; CST ($89 million) moved fromFY2021 to FY2024Major Projects in the FY2020 – FY2024 TIP The Collier MPO TIP identifies major projects as a multi-laning or a new facility type capacity improvement. The following list provides the status of the major projects in the FY2020 – FY2024 TIP. Multi-Laning or New Facility Capacity Improvement Projects I-75 @ SR951; FPN 4258432; Major interchange improvement; $103 million CST, ENV, INC, PE, ROW, RRU inFY2019-2021 and FY2023 ($92 million of project in FY21)SR 29 Projects (Six projects that cover SR29 in its entirety between Oil Well Rd and the Hendry County Line)•FPN 4175402 Add lanes and reconstruction from Oil Well Road to Sunniland Nursery Rd; ENV and PEprogrammed in FY2024 for $8.3 million• FPN 4175403 Add lanes and reconstruction from Sunniland Nursery Rd to S of Agriculture Way;ENV programmed in FY2023 for $0.5 million• FPN 4175404 Add lanes and reconstruction from S of Agricultural Way to CR846 (Immokalee Rd);ENV programmed in FY2023 for $0.3 millionSR82 from Gator Slough to SR 29; 328.B.1Packet Pg. 135Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
SR 82 Projects• FPN 4308481 Add lanes and reconstruction from Hendry County Line to Gator Slough Lane; $48 millionENV, INC, ROW, RRU, CST with CST programmed in FY2023 for $45 million• FPN 4308491 Add lanes and reconstruction from Gator Slough Lane to SR29; CST programmed inFY2020 for $34 millionSR 951 Projects•FPN 4351112 Add lanes and rehabilitate pavement from Manatee Rd to N of Tower Rd; ROW programmed inFY20 for $3.8 million; RRU and CST programmed in FY2024 for $13 millionAirport Pulling Road – FPN 4404411 Add thru lanes from Vanderbilt (Beach) Road to Immokalee Road; $13million PE and CST with CST programmed in FY2023 for $10 million16th St Bridge NE from Golden Gate Boulevard to Randall Boulevard – FPN 4318953 New bridge constructionwith CST programmed in FY2022 for $5 millionPUBLIC INVOLVEMENT The MPO adopted a new Public Participation Plan (PPP) in February 2019. The PPP follows Federal regulations for TIP related public involvement [23 C.F.R. 450.326(b)] and [23 U.S.C. 134 (i)(6) and (7) providing adequate public notice of public participation activities and time for public review and comment at key decision points. Specifically, the TIP and all amendments to the TIP, are presented at multiple meetings of the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC), Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC) and MPO Board; the public may attend and comment at all MPO meetings. Meeting packets are available through the MPO’s website or by calling/emailing the MPO office. Notices specific to the TIP are also posted on the website and distributed via email to listserv(s). TIP AMENDMENTS Occasionally amendments need to be made to the TIP. There are three types of amendments. The first type, Administrative Modification, is used for minor cost changes in a project/project phase, minor changes to funding sources, minor changes to the initiation of any project phase, and correction of scrivener errors. Administrative Modifications do not need MPO Board approval and may be authorized by the MPO’s Executive Director. The second type of amendment – a Roll Forward Amendment – is used to add projects to the TIP that were not added prior to June 30th but were added to the FDOT Work Program between July 1st and September 30th. Roll Forward Amendments are regularly needed largely due to the different state and federal fiscal years. Many of the projects that get rolled 338.B.1Packet Pg. 136Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
forward are FTA projects because these projects do not automatically roll forward in the TIP. Roll Forward Amendments do not have any fiscal impact on the TIP. A TIP Amendment is the third and most substantive type of amendment. These amendments are required when a project is added or deleted (excluding those projects added between July 1 and September 30), a project impacts the fiscal constraint of the TIP, project phase initiation dates, or if there is a substantive change in the scope of a project. TIP Amendments require MPO Board approval, are posted on the MPO website along with comments forms and distributed to listserv(s) via email. The Collier MPO’s PPP defines the process to be followed for TIP amendments. CERTIFICATION The entire MPO process, including the TIP, must be certified by FDOT on an annual basis. The 2017 MPO process was certified by FDOT on June 8, 2018. The 2018 MPO certification process has begun and is expected to be complete before adoption of this TIP. In addition, every four years the MPO must also be certified by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and the Federal Transit Administration (FTA). The last quadrennial FHWA/FTA certification review included a site visit between September 12-14, 2016. FHWA and FTA issued the Collier MPO’s final 2016 Certification Report in December 2016. The next FHWA / FTA joint certification will be in 2020. PROJECT ORGANIZATION Projects are listed in nine different categories. Within each category projects are listed in numerical order using the FPN (Financial Project Number) which is in the upper left corner of each project page. Several of the roads are listed by their county or state road designation. The table below lists these designations along with the commonly used name. Common Name Name in TIP Vanderbilt Drive CR 901 Vanderbilt Beach Road CR 862 San Marco Road CR 92 US 41/Tamiami Trail SR 90 SR 45 Collier Boulevard SR 951 348.B.1Packet Pg. 137Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
EXPLANATION OF PROJECT COSTS Part I of the TIP contains all projects that are listed in the FY2020 – FY2024 TIP. The projects are divided into five categories: highways (including bridges, congestion management, bicycle and pedestrian, and maintenance), transportation planning, transit, transportation disadvantaged and aviation. Each project is illustrated on a separate project page. Future costs are presented in Year of Expenditure Dollars (YOE), which takes inflation into account. The inflation factors were developed by the State. Current and prior year costs are reflected in nominal dollars. Projects often require multiple phases which may include any or all of the following: Project Development and Environment (PD&E), Design (PE), Environment (ENV), Right of Way acquisition (ROW), Railroad and Utilities (RRU), Construction (CST), Operations (OPS), Capital (CAP). Large projects are sometimes constructed in smaller segments and may be shown in multiple TIPs. When this happens, the project description (Letter D) will indicate that the current project is a segment/ phase of a larger project. An example project sheet is shown on the next page as Figure 5. A – Federal Project Number (FPN) B – Location of project C – Denotes is project is on the SIS system D – Project description E – Prior, Future, and Total Project Cost; LRTP and TIP References (if needed) F – FDOT Work Summary G – Lead agency for project H – Project length, if applicable I – Project Phase, Fund Code Source and Funding Amounts by Year, by Phase, by Fund Source J – Map of project area 358.B.1Packet Pg. 138Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
Figure 5 – Project Sheet Example PROJECT COST DISCLAIMER: The “Total Project Cost” amount displayed for of the federal and state funded projects in the TIP represents 10 years of programming in the FDOT Draft Tentative Work Program database for project on the Strategic Intermodal System (SIS) (FY2019 – FY2028), and 5 years of programming in the FDOT Draft Tentative Work Program for non‐SIS projects (FY2019 – FY 2023) plus historical costs information for all projects having expenditures paid by FDOT prior to 2019. For a more comprehensive view of a specific project’s anticipated total budget cost for all phases of the project please refer to the LRTP. 368.B.1Packet Pg. 139Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
PART 1 SECTION A-1 HIGHWAY PROJECTS includesAdding Lanes and ReconstructionAdding Thru-Lanes, Left-Turn Lanes, Turning LanesInterchange ImprovementsPD&E Studies378.B.1Packet Pg. 140Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
Collier MPO TIP FY2020‐20244175402SR 29 FROM OIL WELL ROAD TO SUNNILAND NURSERY ROADSISProject Description:PD&E/EMO Prior Years Cost: 0Future Years Cost:0Total Project Cost: 8,275,000Work Summary:ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCTLRTP Ref:Lead Agency:Length:4.762Phase Fund 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 TotalPE ACNP00001,250,0001,250,000PEDI 00006,140,0006,140,000ENVDI 0000885,000885,0000000Total00008,275,000 8,275,000CFP, Appendix CPending MPO Board Adoption on June 14,2019 March 6, 2019 FDOT SnapshotFDOT388.B.1Packet Pg. 141Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
Collier MPO TIP FY2020‐20244175403SR 29 FROM SUNNILAND NURSERY ROAD TO S OF AGRICULTURE WAYSISProject Description:WIDEN FROM 2‐4 LANES (one segment of larger project) Prior Years Cost:5,100,000Future Years Cost:0Total Project Cost: 5,600,000Work Summary:ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCTLRTP Ref:Lead Agency:FDOTLength:2.548.Phase Fund 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 TotalENV TALT000500,0000 500,000000000Total0 0 0 500,000 0 500,000SIS PLAN APPENDIX APending MPO Board Adoption on June 14,2019 March 6, 2019 FDOT Snapshot398.B.1Packet Pg. 142Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
Collier MPO TIP FY2020‐20244175404SR 29 FROM S OF AGRICULTURE WAY TO CR 846 ESISProject Description:WIDEN FROM 2‐4 LANES (one segment of larger project) Prior Years Cost:3,975,000CR 846 E IS AIRPORT RD (diff from CR31)Future Years Cost:0Total Project Cost: 4,245,000Work Summary:ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCTLRTP Ref:Lead Agency:FDOTLength:2.251Phase Fund 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 TotalENV TALT 0 0 0 270,000 0270,000000000Total0 0 0 270,000 0 270,000SIS PLAN APPENDIX APending MPO Board Adoption on June 14,2019 March 6, 2019 FDOT Snapshot408.B.1Packet Pg. 143Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
Collier MPO TIP FY2020‐20244175405SR 29 FROM CR 846 E TO N OF NEW MARKET ROAD NSISProject Description:WIDEN FROM 2‐4 LANES (one segment of larger project) Prior Years Cost:6,110,093Future Years Cost: 5,879,394Total Project Cost: 13,011,715Work Summary:ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCTLRTP Ref:Lead Agency:FDOTLength:3.484Phase Fund 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 TotalROW ACNP00001,022,2281,022,228000000Total00001,022,228 1,022,228SIS PLAN APPENDIX APending MPO Board Adoption on June 14,2019 March 6, 2019 FDOT Snapshot418.B.1Packet Pg. 144Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
Collier MPO TIP FY2020‐20244175406SR 29 FROM N OF NEW MARKET RD N ROAD TO SR 82SISProject Description:WIDEN FROM 2‐4 LANES (one segment of larger project) Prior Years Cost:4,630,000Future Years Cost: 29,943,239Total Project Cost: 36,075,946Work Summary:ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCTLRTP Ref:Lead Agency:FDOTLength:3.037Phase Fund 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 TotalROW ACNP00001,122,707 1,122,707ENV TALT 0 0 0 380,000 0 380,00000000Total0 0 0 380,000 1,122,707 1,502,707SIS PLAN APPENDIX APending MPO Board Adoption on June 14,2019 March 6, 2019 FDOT Snapshot428.B.1Packet Pg. 145Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
Collier MPO TIP FY2020‐20244178784SR 29 FROM SR 82 TO HENDRY C/LSISProject Description:WIDEN FROM 2‐4 LANES (one segment of larger project) Prior Years Cost:1,979,420Future Years Cost:0Total Project Cost: 14,098,653Work Summary:ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCTLRTP Ref:Lead Agency:FDOTLength:1.869Phase Fund 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 TotalROW ACNP0 1,258,8220001,258,822CST ACNP000 9,753,76109,753,761CST DI000 166,6500166,650INCDDR 0000475,000475,000ENV ACNP400,00000 50,0000450,000ENV DI0 15,00000015,0000Total400,000 1,273,822 0 9,970,411 475,000 12,119,233SIS PLAN APPENDIX APending MPO Board Adoption on June 14,2019 March 6, 2019 FDOT Snapshot438.B.1Packet Pg. 146Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
Collier MPO TIP FY2020‐20244258432I‐75 AT SR 951SISPrior Years Cost:10,030,371Project Description:Ultimate interchange improvement. Part of larger project.Future Years Cost:0Work Summary:INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTTotal Project Cost: 108,242,244LRTP Ref:Lead Agency:FDOTLength:0.651Phase Fund 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 TotalPE DDR 0 0 0 1,087,990 01,087,990ROW ACNP 1,386,46300001,386,463ROW BNIR 4,787,537 0 0 1,323,000 06,110,537RRULF 00001,100,0001,100,000RRUDI 00002,651,0002,651,000ENV DDR 0 0 0 125,000 0125,000DSBLF 0000143,000143,000DSBDI 000085,505,53385,505,533DSBDIH 000057,20057,200DSB DSB2 0 0 45,150 0 045,150Total 6,174,000 0 45,150 2,535,990 89,456,733 98,211,873CFP APPENDIX CPending MPO Board Adoption on June 14,2019 March 6, 2019 FDOT Snapshot448.B.1Packet Pg. 147Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
Collier MPO TIP FY2020‐20244308481SR 82 FROM HENDRY COUNTY LINE TO GATOR SLOUGH LANESISProject Description:WIDEN FROM 2‐4 LANES (one segment of larger project) Prior Years Cost:2,508,148Future Years Cost: 2,800,000Total Project Cost: 53,178,504Work Summary:ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCTLRTP Ref:Lead Agency:FDOTLength:4.022Phase Fund 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 TotalRRU DDR 0 0 0 500,000 0500,000CST DI 0 0 0 44,744,273 044,744,273CST DIH 0 0 0 59,967 059,967ROW BNIR 2,496,11600002,496,116ENV DDR 0 0 20,000 50,000 070,00000Total2,496,116 0 20,000 45,354,240 0 47,870,356SIS PLAN APPENDIX APending MPO Board Adoption on June 14,2019 March 6, 2019 FDOT Snapshot458.B.1Packet Pg. 148Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
Collier MPO TIP FY2020‐20244308491SR 82 FROM GATOR SLOUGH LANE TO SR 29SISProject Description:WIDEN FROM 2‐4 LANES (one segment of larger project) Prior Years Cost:2,618,161Future Years Cost:0Total Project Cost: 36,861,706Work Summary:ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCTLRTP Ref:Lead Agency:FDOTLength:3.219Phase Fund 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 TotalCST LF 123,7750000123,775CST DIH 158,2090000158,209CST GMR 29,931,844000029,931,844CST SIWR 4,029,71700004,029,717000Total34,243,545000034,243,545SIS PLAN APPENDIX APending MPO Board Adoption on June 14,2019 March 6, 2019 FDOT Snapshot468.B.1Packet Pg. 149Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
Collier MPO TIP FY2020‐20244351112 SR 951 FROM MANATEE ROAD TO N OF TOWER ROADProject Description:PD&E/EMO Prior Years Cost: 0Future Years Cost: 0Total Project Cost: 8275000Work Summary:ADD LANES & REHABILITATE PVMT LRTP Ref: CFP, Appendix CLead Agency: Length:0.35Phase Fund 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 TotalROW DDR 3,812,75100003,812,751RRULF 00003,000,0003,000,000CSTLF 0000171,600171,600CSTDDR 00006,549,4706,549,470CSTDIH 000011,44011,440CSTDS 00003,071,6243,071,6240Total3,812,751 0 0 0 12,804,134 16,616,885Pending MPO Board Adoption on June 14,2019 March 6, 2019 FDOT SnapshotFDOT478.B.1Packet Pg. 150Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
Collier MPO TIP FY2020‐20244404411AIRPORT PULLING RD FROM VANDERBILT RD TO IMMOKALEE RDProject Description:Add thru lanes Prior Years Cost: 0Future Years Cost:0Total Project Cost: 12,856,200Work Summary:ADD THRU LANE(S)LRTP Ref:Lead Agency:Length:1.97Phase Fund 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 TotalPE LF0 1,500,000 0 0 01,500,000PE CIGP0 1,500,000 0 0 01,500,000CST LF0 0 0 4,928,100 04,928,100CST CIGP0 0 0 4,928,100 04,928,100000Total0 3,000,000 0 9,856,200 0 12,856,200CFP, Appendix CPending MPO Board Adoption on June 14,2019 March 6, 2019 FDOT SnapshotCOLLIER COUNTY488.B.1Packet Pg. 151Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
Collier MPO TIP FY2020‐20244419751US 41 (SR 90) AT OASIS VISITOR CENTERSISProject Description:Prior Years Cost: 0Future Years Cost:0Total Project Cost:731,107Work Summary:ADD LEFT TURN LANE(S)LRTP Ref:Lead Agency:FDOTLength:0.276Phase Fund 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 TotalPE DDR 150,0000000150,000PE DIH 10,000000010,000CST DDR 0 0 0 509,442 0509,442CST DIH 0 0 0 16,665 016,665ENV DDR 0 15,000 30,000 0 045,00000Total160,000 15,000 30,000 526,107 0 731,107REVENUE PROJECTIONS P5‐5 APPENDIX APending MPO Board Adoption on June 14,2019 March 6, 2019 FDOT Snapshot498.B.1Packet Pg. 152Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
Collier MPO TIP FY2020‐20244452961I‐75 @ PINE RIDGE ROADSISProject Description:PD&E/EMO Prior Years Cost: 0Future Years Cost:0Total Project Cost: 1,015,000Work Summary:PD&E/EMO STUDYLRTP Ref:Lead Agency: Length:1.97Phase Fund 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 TotalPDE DDR 1,000,00000001,000,000PDE DIH 15,000000015,00000000Total1,015,00000001,015,000CFP, Appendix CPending MPO Board Adoption on June 14,2019 March 6, 2019 FDOT SnapshotFDOT508.B.1Packet Pg. 153Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
Collier MPO TIP FY2020‐2024FW_FLPA_419(1) FLORIDA PANTHER NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGEProject Description:Rehab Fritz Road (Rt 419) (Design Phase) Prior Years Cost:750,000 Future Years Cost:N/ATotal Project Cost:1,500,000 Work Summary:Rehabilitaion of Fritz Road (Rt 419)(Design Phase) LRTP Ref: N/ALead Agency: Length:0.35Phase Fund 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 Total3RL FLTP 0 750,000 0 0 0750,000000000Total0 750,000 0 0 0 750,000Pending MPO Board Adoption on June 14,2019 March 6, 2019 FDOT SnapshotFHWA / EFLHD518.B.1Packet Pg. 154Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
PART 1 SECTION A-2 BRIDGE PROJECTS includes Bridge Projects528.B.1Packet Pg. 155Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
Collier MPO FY2020 ‐ FY2024 TIP431895316TH ST BRIDGE NE FROM GOLDEN GATE BLVD TO RANDALL BLVDProject Description:Prior Years Cost: 0Future Years Cost: 0Total Project Cost: 4,933,944Work Summary:NEW BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION LRTP Ref:Lead Agency:Collier CountyLength:3.212Phase Fund 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 TotalCST SA00 1,132,944001,132,944CST SU00 3,801,000003,801,00000000Total0 0 4,933,944 0 0 4,933,944REVENUE PROJECTIONS P5‐5 APPENDIX APending MPO Board Adoption June 14, 2019March 6, 2019 FDOT Snapshot538.B.1Packet Pg. 156Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
Collier MPO FY2020 ‐ FY2024 TIP4348571SR 951 OVER BIG MARCO PASS(JUDGE JOLLEY MEMORIAL BRIDGE)Project Description:Prior Years Cost: 0Future Years Cost: 0Total Project Cost: 2,694,382Work Summary:BRIDGE‐REPAIR/REHABILITATION LRTP Ref:Lead Agency:FDOTLength:0.302Phase Fund 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 TotalPE BRRP250,0000000250,000PE DIH20,000000020,000CST BRRP0 2,393,3220002,393,322CST DIH0 21,06000021,060ENV BRRP10,000000010,00000Total280,000 2,414,382 0 0 0 2,694,382REVENUE PROJECTIONS P5‐5 APPENDIX APending MPO Board Adoption June 14, 2019March 6, 2019 FDOT Snapshot548.B.1Packet Pg. 157Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
Collier MPO FY2020 ‐ FY2024 TIP4350431COLLIER COUNTY SCOUR COUNTERMEASURE AT VARIOUS LOCATIONSProject Description:Prior Years Cost: 30,398Future Years Cost: 0Total Project Cost: 1,356,708Work Summary:BRIDGE‐REPAIR/REHABILITATION LRTP Ref:Lead Agency:FDOTLength:NAPhase Fund 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 TotalPE BRRP000 200,0000200,000PEDIH 000000CST BRRP00 151,3400 920,9201,072,260CST DIH00 54,0500054,050000Total0 0 205,390 200,000 920,920 1,326,310REVENUE PROJECTIONS APPENDIX A P5‐5Pending MPO Board Adoption June 14, 2019March 6, 2019 FDOT Snapshot558.B.1Packet Pg. 158Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
PART 1 SECTION A-3 CONGESTION MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS/ INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS (CMS/ITS) PROJECTS includesTraffic SignalsTraffic Signal UpdatesTraffic Operations ImprovementsIntelligent Transportation System (ITS)ATMS Arterial Traffic ManagementTraffic Management Center (TMC) Software568.B.1Packet Pg. 159Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
Collier MPO FY2020 ‐ FY2024 TIP4051061COLLIER MPO IDENTIFIED OPERATIONAL IMPROVEMENTS FUNDINGProject Description:MPO SU FUNDS HELD FOR COST OVER‐RUNS, FUTURE PROGRAMMING Prior Years Cost:1,016,835Future Years Cost:0Total Project Cost:6,192,481Work Summary:TRAFFIC OPS IMPROVEMENTLRTP Ref:Lead Agency:FDOTLength:NAPhase Fund 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 TotalCST SU506,518 163,287 229,418 1,061,033 3,215,3905,175,646000000Total506,518 163,287 229,418 1,061,033 3,215,390 5,175,646CFP‐CMS/ITS PROJECTS P6‐24 & APPENDIX A Pending MPO Board Adoption June 14, 2019March 6, 2019 FDOT Snapshot578.B.1Packet Pg. 160Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
Collier MPO FY2020 ‐ FY2024 TIP4126661 COLLIER COUNTY TRAFFIC SIGNALS REIMBURSEMENTProject Description:Prior Years Cost: N/AFuture Years Cost:N/ATotal Project Cost:N/AWork Summary:TRAFFIC SIGNALSLRTP Ref:Lead Agency:COLLIER COUNTYLength:12.814Phase Fund 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 TotalOPS DDR331,017 339,661 348,971 358,843 369,3481,747,840000000Total331,017 339,661 348,971 358,843 369,348 1,747,840REVENUE PROJECTIONS APPENDIX A P5‐5Pending MPO Board Adoption June 14, 2019March 6, 2019 FDOT Snapshot588.B.1Packet Pg. 161Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
Collier MPO FY2020 ‐ FY2024 TIP4136271NAPLES TRAFFIC SIGNALS REIMBURSEMENTProject Description:Prior Years Cost: N/AFuture Years Cost:N/ATotal Project Cost:N/AWork Summary:TRAFFIC SIGNALSLRTP Ref:Lead Agency:FDOTLength:Phase Fund 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 TotalOPS DDR122,010 125,194 128,621 132,249 136,117644,191000000Total122,010 125,194 128,621 132,249 136,117 644,191REVENUE PROJECTIONS APPENDIX A P5‐5Pending MPO Board Adoption June 14, 2019March 6, 2019 FDOT Snapshot598.B.1Packet Pg. 162Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
Collier MPO FY2020 ‐ FY2024 TIP4371031COLLIER TMC OPS FUND COUNTY WIDEProject Description:Prior Years Cost: N/AFuture Years Cost:N/ATotal Project Cost:N/AWork Summary:OTHER ITSLRTP Ref:Lead Agency:COLLIER COUNTYLength:Phase Fund 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 TotalOPS DS81,000 81,000 81,000 81,000 81,000 405,000000000Total81,00081,000 81,000 81,000 81,000 405,000CFP‐CMS/ITS PROJECTS P6‐24 & APPENDIX A Pending MPO Board Adoption June 14, 2019March 6, 2019 FDOT Snapshot608.B.1Packet Pg. 163Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
Collier MPO FY2020 ‐ FY2024 TIP4371041NAPLES TMC OPERATIONS FUNDING CITY WIDEProject Description:Prior Years Cost: N/AFuture Years Cost:N/ATotal Project Cost:N/AWork Summary:OTHER ITSLRTP Ref:Lead Agency:NAPLESLengthNA TIP Amendment: Roll Forward 9‐9‐16Phase Fund 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 TotalOPS DDR50,000000050,000OPS DS30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000150,00000000Total80,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 200,000CFP‐CMS/ITS PROJECTS P6‐24 & APPENDIX A Pending MPO Board Adoption June 14, 2019March 6, 2019 FDOT Snapshot618.B.1Packet Pg. 164Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
Collier MPO FY2020 ‐ FY2024 TIP4379241TRAVEL TIME DATA COLLECTION COLLIER COUNTY ITS ARCH ATMSProject Description:CMC PRIORITY 2012‐10 Prior Years Cost: 0Future Years Cost:0Total Project Cost:441,000Work Summary:OTHER ITSLRTP Ref:Lead Agency:COLLIER COUNTYLength:NAPhase Fund 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 TotalCST SA0 0 441,000 0 0 441,000000000Total0 0 441,000 0 0 441,000CFP‐CMS/ITS PROJECTS P6‐24 & APPENDIX A Pending MPO Board Adoption June 14, 2019March 6, 2019 FDOT Snapshot628.B.1Packet Pg. 165Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
Collier MPO FY2020 ‐ FY2024 TIP4379251SIGNAL TIMING COUNTY ROADS AT VARIOUS LOCATIONSProject Description:CMC PRIORITY 2015‐03 Prior Years Cost: 0Future Years Cost:0Total Project Cost:452,560Work Summary:TRAFFIC SIGNAL UPDATELRTP Ref:Lead Agency:COLLIER COUNTYLength:NAPhase Fund 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 TotalCST SA0 0 452,560 0 0 452,560000000Total0 0 452,560 0 0 452,560CFP‐CMS/ITS PROJECTS P6‐24 & APPENDIX A Pending MPO Board Adoption June 14, 2019March 6, 2019 FDOT Snapshot638.B.1Packet Pg. 166Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
Collier MPO FY2020 ‐ FY2024 TIP4379261SIGNAL TIMING US41 FROM SR951/COLLIER BLVD TO OLD US41Project Description:CMC PRIORITY 2014‐04, 2015‐01Prior Years Cost:0Future Years Cost:0Total Project Cost:516,200Work Summary:TRAFFIC SIGNAL UPDATELRTP Ref:Lead Agency:COLLIER COUNTYLength:19.96Phase Fund 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 TotalCST SU0 516,20000 0 516,200000000Total0 516,200000516,200CFP‐CMS/ITS PROJECTS P6‐24 & APPENDIX A Pending MPO Board Adoption June 14, 2019March 6, 2019 FDOT Snapshot648.B.1Packet Pg. 167Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
Collier MPO FY2020 ‐ FY2024 TIP4404351COLLIER COUNTY TRAFFIC SIGNAL TIMING OPTIMIZATION AT VARIOUS LOCATIONSProject Description:CMC PRIORITY 2016‐02Prior Years Cost:0Future Years Cost:0Total Project Cost:401,000Work Summary:TRAFFIC SIGNAL UPDATELRTP Ref:Lead Agency:COLLIER COUNTYLength:NAPhase Fund 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 TotalPE SU00 351,00000351,000CST SU000 50,000050,00000000Total0 0 351,000 50,000 0 401,000CFP‐CMS/ITS PROJECTS P6‐24 & APPENDIX A Pending MPO Board Adoption June 14, 2019March 6, 2019 FDOT Snapshot658.B.1Packet Pg. 168Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
PART 1 SECTION A-4 BICYCLE and PEDESTRIAN PROJECTS includesBicycle and Pedestrian Projects Pedestrian Safety Improvements668.B.1Packet Pg. 169Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
Collier MPO FY2020 ‐ FY2024 TIP4331891N COLLIER BLVD FROM E ELKCAM CIRCLE TO BUTTONWOOD COURTProject Description:BPAC PRIORITY 2012‐07 Prior Years Cost: 52,500Future Years Cost: 0Total Project Cost: 814,225Work Summary:SIDEWALK LRTP Ref:Lead Agency:MARCO ISLANDLength:0.658Phase Fund 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 TotalCST SU 656,5790000656,579CST LFP 105,1460000105,14600000Total761,7250000761,725CFP P6‐25 Pending MPO Board Adoption June 14, 2019March 6, 2019 FDOT Snapshot678.B.1Packet Pg. 170Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
Collier MPO FY2020 ‐ FY2024 TIP4369701CR 92 (SAN MARCO RD) FROM S BARFIELD DRIVE TO 400 FT E OF VINTAGE BAY)Project Description:BPAC PRIORITY 2014‐03 Prior Years Cost: 0Future Years Cost: 0Total Project Cost: 1,330,114Work Summary:SIDEWALK LRTP Ref:Lead Agency:MARCO ISLANDLength:1.42Phase Fund 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 TotalCST SU1,330,11400001,330,11400000Total1,330,11400001,330,114CFP P6‐25 Pending MPO Board Adoption June 14, 2019March 6, 2019 FDOT Snapshot688.B.1Packet Pg. 171Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
Collier MPO FY2020 ‐ FY2024 TIP4370961FROM SOUTHERN LIMITS ON COPELAND AVE TO NE BROADWAY AND COPELAND AVEProject Description:BPAC PRIORITY 2017‐10, 16‐10, 15‐10, 14‐05 Prior Years Cost: 0Future Years Cost: 0Total Project Cost: 852,632Work Summary:SIDEWALK LRTP Ref:CFP P6‐25 TIP Amendment:2019_0510Lead Agency:FDOTLength:0.953Phase Fund 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 TotalPE TALT150,0000000150,000PE TALU185,0000000185,000CST TALT00 84,6920084,692CST TALU00 372,94000372,940ENV TALT0 20,000 40,0000060,00000Total335,000 20,000 497,632 0 0 852,632Pending MPO Board Adoption June 14, 2019March 6, 2019 FDOT Snapshot698.B.1Packet Pg. 172Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
Collier MPO FY2020 ‐ FY2024 TIP4371851NAPLES BEACH ACCESS SIDEWALKS AT VARIOUS LOCATIONSProject Description:BPAC PRIORITY 2014‐07 Prior Years Cost: 550,225Future Years Cost: 0Total Project Cost: 1,668,907Work Summary:SIDEWALK LRTP Ref:Lead Agency:FDOTLength:0.96Phase Fund 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 TotalCST SU 1,118,68200001,118,682000000Total1,118,68200001,118,682CFP P6‐25 Pending MPO Board Adoption June 14, 2019March 6, 2019 FDOT Snapshot708.B.1Packet Pg. 173Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
Collier MPO FY2020 ‐ FY2024 TIP4380911COUNTY BARN ROAD FROM RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK TO SR 84(DAVIS BLVD)Project Description:BPAC PRIORITY 2017‐01, 16‐01, 15‐01, 14‐01, 13‐05 Prior Years Cost:0Future Years Cost:0Total Project Cost: 2,055,376Work Summary:BIKE PATH/TRAIL LRTP Ref:Lead Agency:COLLIER COUNTYLength:2.045Phase Fund 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 TotalPE SU 0 176,000 0 0 0176,000CST SA 0 0 0 50,000 050,000CST SU 0 0 0 1,829,376 01,829,3760000Total0 176,000 0 1,879,376 0 2,055,376CFP P6‐25 Pending MPO Board Adoption June 14, 2019March 6, 2019 FDOT Snapshot718.B.1Packet Pg. 174Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
Collier MPO FY2020 ‐ FY2024 TIP4380921CR 901/VANDERBILT DR FROM VANDERBILT BEACH RD TO 109TH AVENUE NProject Description:BPAC PRIORITY 2017‐02, 16‐02, 15‐02, 14‐02 Prior Years Cost: 0Future Years Cost: 0Total Project Cost: 860,075Work Summary:SIDEWALK LRTP Ref:Lead Agency:COLLIER COUNTYLength:1.214Phase Fund 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 TotalPESU0 151,000 0 0 0151,000CSTSU0 0 0 709,075 0709,07500000Total0 151,000 0 709,075 0 860,075CFP P6‐25 Pending MPO Board Adoption June 14, 2019March 6, 2019 FDOT Snapshot728.B.1Packet Pg. 175Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
Collier MPO FY2020 ‐ FY2024 TIP4380931GREEN BLVD FROM SANTA BARBARA BLVD TO SUNSHINE BLVDProject Description:BPAC PRIORITY 2017‐03, 16‐03, 15‐03, 14‐06 Prior Years Cost: 0Future Years Cost: 0Total Project Cost: 1,310,670Work Summary:BIKE LANE/SIDEWALK LRTP Ref:Lead Agency:COLLIER COUNTYLength:1.040Phase Fund 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 TotalPE SU0 226,000000226,000CST SU000 1,084,67001,084,67000000Total0 226,000 0 1,084,670 0 1,310,670CFP P6‐25 Pending MPO Board Adoption June 14, 2019March 6, 2019 FDOT Snapshot738.B.1Packet Pg. 176Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
Collier MPO FY2020 ‐ FY2024 TIP4390021SR29 FROM NORTH 1ST STREET TO NORTH 9TH STREETProject Description:Prior Years Cost: 513,342Future Years Cost: 0Total Project Cost: 3,243,599Work Summary:PEDESTRIAN SAFETY IMPROVEMENT LRTP Ref:Lead Agency:FDOTLength:0.502Phase Fund 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 TotalCST LF 123,120 123,120CST SU 1,000,0001,000,000CST DDR 1,607,1371,607,1370000Total2,730,25700002,730,257CFP P6‐25 Pending MPO Board Adoption June 14, 2019March 6, 2019 FDOT Snapshot748.B.1Packet Pg. 177Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
Collier MPO FY2020 ‐ FY2024 TIP4404361MANDARIN GREENWAY SIDEWALKS AT VARIOUS LOCATIONSProject Description:BPAC PRIORITY 2015 & 2016‐08; SW LOOP ON 4 STREETS ‐ ORCHARD DR, MAPrior Years Cost:0TO ORCHARD DR, SIDEWALKSFuture Years Cost:0Total Project Cost:394,718Work Summary:BIKE LANE/SIDEWALKLRTP Ref:Lead Agency:NAPLESLength:0.840Phase Fund 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 TotalPE TALU45,311000045,311CST SU0 0 331,929 0 0331,929CST DDR0 0 17,478 0 017,4780000Total45,311 0 349,407 0 0 394,718CFP P6‐25 Pending MPO Board Adoption June 14, 2019March 6, 2019 FDOT Snapshot758.B.1Packet Pg. 178Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
Collier MPO FY2020 ‐ FY2024 TIP4404371SOUTH GOLF DR FROM GULF SHORE BLVD TO W US 41Project Description:BPAC PRIORITY 2017‐05, 16‐05, 15‐05, 14‐09 Prior Years Cost: 279,363Future Years Cost: NATotal Project Cost: 2,256,112Work Summary:BIKE LANE/SIDE WALK LRTP Ref:Lead Agency:NAPLESLength:0.75Phase Fund 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 TotalCST SA 0 0 01,976,7490 1,976,749000000Total0 0 0 1,976,749 0 1,976,749CFP P6‐25 Pending MPO Board Adoption June 14, 2019March 6, 2019 FDOT Snapshot768.B.1Packet Pg. 179Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
Collier MPO FY2020 ‐ FY2024 TIP4404381SAN MARCO RD FROM VINTAGE BAY DRIVE TO GOODLAND RDProject Description:BPAC Priority: 2016‐04, 15‐04 Prior Years Cost: 45,000REMOVE SW REPLACE 8' SHARED USE PATH SOUTH SIDE Future Years Cost:0Total Project Cost:695,062Work Summary:BIKE PATH/TRAILLRTP Ref:Lead Agency:MARCO ISLANDLength:1.440Phase Fund 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 TotalCST SU0 650,062 0 0 0 650,062000000Total0 650,062 0 0 0 650,062CFP P6‐25 Pending MPO Board Adoption June 14, 2019March 6, 2019 FDOT Snapshot778.B.1Packet Pg. 180Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
Collier MPO FY2020 ‐ FY2024 TIP4414801EDEN PARK ELEMENTARYProject Description:Safe Routes to School project (SRTS)Prior Years Cost:55,738South side of Carson Rd from Westclox to Carson Lakes Cir 6' SWFuture Years Cost:0Total Project Cost:719,071Work Summary:SIDEWALKLRTP Ref:Lead Agency:COLLIER COUNTYLength:0.75Phase Fund 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 TotalPESR2T000000CSTSR2T00 663,33300663,33300000Total0 0 663,333 0 0 663,333CFP P6‐25 Pending MPO Board Adoption June 14, 2019March 6, 2019 FDOT Snapshot788.B.1Packet Pg. 181Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
Collier MPO FY2020 ‐ FY2024 TIP4418461111TH AVE NORTH FROM BLUEBILL AVE BRIDGE TO 7TH ST NORTHProject Description:BPAC PRIORITY 2014, 2015 & 2016‐07 Prior Years Cost: 64,740FOR 5' BIKE LANES Future Years Cost: 0Total Project Cost: 618,150Work Summary:BIKE LANE/SIDEWALK LRTP Ref:Lead Agency:COLLIER COUNTYLength:0.51Phase Fund 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 TotalCST SU0 553,410000553,410000000Total0 553,410 0 0 0 553,410CFP P6‐25 Pending MPO Board Adoption June 14, 2019March 6, 2019 FDOT Snapshot798.B.1Packet Pg. 182Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
Collier MPO FY2020 ‐ FY2024 TIP4418781BALD EAGLE DRIVE FROM COLLIER BLVD TO OLD MARCO LNProject Description:BPAC PRIORITY 2014, 2014 & 2016‐09 Prior Years Cost: 0Future Years Cost: 0Total Project Cost: 509,685Work Summary:SIDEWALK LRTP Ref:Lead Agency:MARCO ISLANDLength:0.89Phase Fund 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 TotalCST SU0 509,685 0 0 0509,68500000Total0 509,685 0 0 0 509,685CFP P6‐25 Pending MPO Board Adoption June 14, 2019March 6, 2019 FDOT Snapshot808.B.1Packet Pg. 183Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
Collier MPO FY2020 ‐ FY2024 TIP4418791INLET DRIVE FROM ADDISON CT TO TRAVIDA TERRACEProject Description:8' SHARED USE PATHWAY EAST & SOUTH SIDE Prior Years Cost: 0BPAC PRIORITY 2017‐12, 16‐12, 15‐12 Future Years Cost: 0Total Project Cost: 411,781Work Summary:SIDEWALK LRTP Ref:Lead Agency:MARCO ISLANDLength:0.65Phase Fund 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 TotalCST SU 0411,7810 0 0 411,781000000Total0 411,781 0 0 0 411,781CFP P6‐25 Pending MPO Board Adoption June 14, 2019March 6, 2019 FDOT Snapshot818.B.1Packet Pg. 184Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
Collier MPO FY2020 ‐ FY2024 TIP4433753COLLIER COUNTY LAKE TRAFFORD ROAD SIDEWALK AND BIKE LANESProject Description:BPAC PRIORITY 2017‐13, 16‐13, 15‐03; 5' BIKE LANES Prior Years Cost:0Future Years Cost:0Total Project Cost:800,460Work Summary:SIDEWALKLRTP Ref:Lead Agency:COLLIER COUNTYLength:0.01Phase Fund 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 TotalCST SU0 800,460 0 0 0800,460000000Total0 800,460 0 0 0 800,460CFP P6‐25 Pending MPO Board Adoption June 14, 2019March 6, 2019 FDOT Snapshot828.B.1Packet Pg. 185Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
Collier MPO FY2020 ‐ FY2024 TIP4433754COLLIER COUNTY LAKE TRAFFORD ROAD SIDEWALK AND BIKE LANESProject Description:BPAC PRIORITY 2017‐11, 16‐11, 15‐11; 6' SW Prior Years Cost: 0Future Years Cost: 0Total Project Cost: 572,675Work Summary:SIDEWALK LRTP Ref:Lead Agency:COLLIER COUNTYLength:0.01Phase Fund 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 TotalCST SU0 572,675 0 0 0572,675000000Total0 572,675 0 0 0 572,675CFP P6‐25 Pending MPO Board Adoption June 14, 2019March 6, 2019 FDOT Snapshot838.B.1Packet Pg. 186Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
Collier MPO TIP FY2020‐FY20244455811Project Description:Prior Years Cost:0Future Years Cost:Total Project Cost: 16,415,864Work Summary:LRTP Ref:Lead Agency:N/APhase FundIMMOKALEE COMPLETE STREETSSidewalks, bike lanes, drainage and other improvments generally in the vicinity of ImmokaleeSIDEWALKS / COMPLETE STREETSCollier County Length:2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24TotalDSB TIGER IX13,132,691DSB LF3,283,1730000000Total0 16,415,864NOTE: This project is the result of a TIGER Grant being awarded to Collier County.TIGER Grants are not fiscally constrained therefore this project does not effect, nor is it shown in, the fiscal constraint that is present in this TIP. The funds will be spent over the course of the three fiscal years shown. NOTE: Project Costs are projected based on anticipated funds which are based on receipt and expenditure of these funds.16,415,86413,132,6913,283,173Pending MPO Board Adoption on June 14, 2019 March 6, 2019 FDOT Snapshot848.B.1Packet Pg. 187Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
PART 1 SECTION A-5 HIGHWAY MAINTENANCE PROJECTS includesResurfacingLandscapingRoutine MaintenanceToll Operations on I-75858.B.1Packet Pg. 188Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
Collier MPO FY2020 ‐ FY20240001511TOLL OPERATIONS EVERGLADES PARKWAY ALLIGATOR ALLEYProject Description:Continued toll operations on I‐75 (Alligator Alley) Prior Years Cost:N/AFuture Years Cost:N/ATotal Project Cost:N/AWork Summary:TOLL PLAZA LRTP Ref:Lead Agency:FDOTLength:N/APhase Fund 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 TotalOPS TOO24,165,000 4,170,000 4,175,000 4,185,000 4,185,00020,880,000000000Total4,165,000 4,170,000 4,175,000 4,185,000 4,185,000 20,880,000APPENDIX A Pending MPO Board Adoption June 14, 2019March 6, 2019 FDOT Snapshot868.B.1Packet Pg. 189Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
Collier MPO FY2020 ‐ FY20244125741COLLIER COUNTY HIGHWAY LIGHTINGProject Description:Highway Lighting Prior Years Cost: 3,302,005Future Years Cost: 0Total Project Cost: 3,995,079Work Summary:ROUTINE MAINTENANCE LRTP Ref:Lead Agency:COLLIER COUNTYLength:N/APhase Fund 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 TotalDMNT341,416 351,658000693,074000000Total341,416 351,658000693,074Revenue Projections, p 5‐5, Appendix APending MPO Board Adoption June 14, 2019March 6, 2019 FDOT Snapshot878.B.1Packet Pg. 190Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
Collier MPO FY2020 ‐ FY20244129182COLLIER COUNTY ASSET MAINTENANCEProject Description:Asset Maintenance Prior Years Cost: N/AFuture Years Cost: N/ATotal Project Cost: N/AWork Summary:ROUTINE MAINTENANCE LRTP Ref:Lead Agency:FDOTLength:N/APhase Fund 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 TotalD MNT2,601,450 2,601,450 2,601,450 2,601,450 2,601,45013,007,250000000Total2,601,450 2,601,450 2,601,450 2,601,450 2,601,450 13,007,250Revenue Projections, p 5‐5, Appendix APending MPO Board Adoption June 14, 2019March 6, 2019 FDOT Snapshot888.B.1Packet Pg. 191Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
Collier MPO FY2020 ‐ FY20244135371NAPLES HIGHWAY LIGHTING DDR FUNDINGProject Description:Naples Highway Lighting Prior Years Cost: 1,582,552Future Years Cost: 0Total Project Cost: 1,881,181Work Summary:ROUTINE MAINTENANCE LRTP Ref:Lead Agency:CITY OF NAPLESLength:N/APhase Fund 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 TotalMNT D147,108 151,521000298,629000000Total147,108 151,521 0 0 0 298,629Revenue Projections, p 5‐5, Appendix APending MPO Board Adoption June 14, 2019March 6, 2019 FDOT Snapshot898.B.1Packet Pg. 192Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
Collier MPO FY2020 ‐ FY2024US41(SR 90) TAMIAMI TRL FM E OF SR84(DAVIS BLVD) TO COURTHOUSE SHADOWSSISProject Description:INCORPORATES SOME RECOMMENDATIONS FROM FDOT RSA FOR Prior Years Cost:76,942AIRPORT‐PULLING/US 41 AREAFuture Years Cost:0Total Project Cost: 8,836,090Work Summary:RESURFACINGLRTP Ref:Lead Agency:FDOTLength:1.35Phase Fund 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 TotalPEDIH 000000PEDS 000000CST ACSS0 1,496,4400001,496,440CST SA0 52,65000052,650CST DDR0 7,105,0580007,105,058ENV DDR30,000 75,000000105,0000Total30,000 8,729,148 0 0 0 8,759,1484380591REVENUE PROJECTIONS P5‐5 APPENDIX APending MPO Board Adoption June 14, 2019March 6, 2019 FDOT Snapshot908.B.1Packet Pg. 193Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
Collier MPO FY2020 ‐ FY20244385841I‐75/ALLIGATOR ALLEY TOLL BOOTH LANDSCAPINGSISProject Description:Prior Years Cost: 0Future Years Cost:1,079,048Total Project Cost: 1,289,048Work Summary:LANDSCAPING LRTP Ref:Lead Agency:FDOTLength:N/APhase Fund 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 TotalPE DDR0 200,000000200,000PE DIH0 10,00000010,00000000Total0 210,000 0 0 0 210,000P5‐3, 5‐5 & APPENDIX APending MPO Board Adoption June 14, 2019March 6, 2019 FDOT Snapshot918.B.1Packet Pg. 194Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
Collier MPO FY2020 ‐ FY20244395551SR 951 FROM JUDGE JOLLEY BRIDGE TO FIDDLERS CREEK PARKWAYSISProject Description:Prior Years Cost: 6,508,066Future Years Cost: 0Total Project Cost: 6,558,066Work Summary:RESURFACING LRTP Ref:Lead Agency:FDOTLength:3.031Phase Fund 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 TotalPEDIH 00000PEDS 000000CSTDS 000000ENV DDR50,000000050,000CST ACSA000000CSTDDR 00000000Total50,000000050,000REVENUE PROJECTIONS P5‐5 APPENDIX APending MPO Board Adoption June 14, 2019March 6, 2019 FDOT Snapshot928.B.1Packet Pg. 195Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
Collier MPO FY2020 ‐ FY20244411281I‐75 (SR 93) AT CR 886 (GOLDEN GATE PKWY)SISProject Description:Prior Years Cost: 0Future Years Cost: 1,342,920Total Project Cost: 1,552,920Work Summary:LANDSCAPING LRTP Ref:Lead Agency:FDOTLocation: N/APhase Fund 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 TotalPE DDR200,000000200,000PE DIH10,00000010,00000000Total210,0000000210,000P5‐3, 5‐5 & APPENDIX APending MPO Board Adoption June 14, 2019March 6, 2019 FDOT Snapshot938.B.1Packet Pg. 196Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
Collier MPO FY2020 ‐ FY20244415121US 41 (SR45) FROM S OF DUNRUSS CREEK TO S OF GULF PARK DRSISProject Description:Prior Years Cost: 1,520,250Future Years Cost: 0Total Project Cost: 16,816,658Work Summary:RESURFACING LRTP Ref:Lead Agency:FDOTLength:4.735Phase Fund 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 TotalPEDDR 000000PEDIH 000000CST SA000 55,550055,550CST DDR000 15,240,858015,240,858000Total0 0 0 15,296,408 0 15,296,408REVENUE PROJECTIONS P5‐5 APPENDIX APending MPO Board Adoption June 14, 2019March 6, 2019 FDOT Snapshot948.B.1Packet Pg. 197Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
Collier MPO FY2020 ‐ FY20244415611SR 90 FROM WHISTLER'S COVE TO COLLIER BLVDSISProject Description:Prior Years Cost: 10,000Future Years Cost: 0Total Project Cost: 6,328,517Work Summary:RESURFACING LRTP Ref:Lead Agency:FDOTLength:1.38Phase Fund 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 TotalPEDIH 000000CST DDR00 6,200,277006,200,277CST DIH00 43,2400043,240ENV DDR0 25,000 50,0000075,000000Total0 25,000 6,293,517 0 0 6,318,517REVENUE PROJECTIONS P5‐5 APPENDIX APending MPO Board Adoption June 14, 2019March 6, 2019 FDOT Snapshot958.B.1Packet Pg. 198Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
Collier MPO FY2020 ‐ FY20244439891US41(SR90) FROM SR951(COLLIER BLVD) TO GREENWAY ROADProject Description:US 41 Landscaping Prior Years Cost: 10,000Future Years Cost: 0Total Project Cost: 1,988,000Work Summary:LANDSCAPING LRTP Ref:Lead Agency:FDOTLength:49.039Phase Fund 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 TotalPEDIH 00000CST DDR0 1,978,0000001,978,000000000Total0 1,978,000 0 0 0 1,978,000P5‐3, 5‐5 & APPENDIX APending MPO Board Adoption June 14, 2019March 6, 2019 FDOT Snapshot968.B.1Packet Pg. 199Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
Collier MPO FY2020 ‐ FY20244440081I‐75 (SR 93) FROM BROWARD COUNTY LINE TO TOLL BOOTHProject Description:I‐75 Resurfacing Prior Years Cost: 0Future Years Cost: 0Total Project Cost: 90,057,573Work Summary:RESURFACING LRTP Ref:Lead Agency:FDOTLength:49.039Phase Fund 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 TotalPE DSB2 4,751,0000000CST DDR 0 0 1,525,599 0 01,525,599CST DS00 208,90500208,905CST DSB200 88,323,0690088,323,0690000Total0 0 90,057,573 0 0 90,057,573Revenue Projections, p 5‐5, Appendix APending MPO Board Adoption June 14, 2019March 6, 2019 FDOT Snapshot978.B.1Packet Pg. 200Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
PART 1 SECTION B TRANSPORTATION PLANNING PROJECTS includesMPO Planning Funds988.B.1Packet Pg. 201Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
Collier MPO FY2020 ‐ FY2024 TIP4393142COLLIER COUNTY MPO F7 2018/2019‐2019/2020 UPWPProject Description:Prior Years Cost: 0Future Years Cost:0Total Project Cost:546,564Work Summary:TRANSPORTATION PLANNINGLRTP Ref:Lead Agency:MPOLength:NAPhase Fund 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 TotalPLN PL546,5640 0 0 546,564000000Total546,5640000546,564GOALS & OBJECTIVES P3‐5Pending MPO Board Adoption June 14, 2019March 6, 2019 FDOT Snapshot998.B.1Packet Pg. 202Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
Collier MPO FY2020 ‐ FY2024 TIP4393143COLLIER COUNTY MPO FY 2020/2021‐2021/2022 UPWPProject Description:Prior Years Cost: 0Future Years Cost:0Total Project Cost: 1,093,128Work Summary:TRANSPORTATION PLANNINGLRTP Ref:Lead Agency:MPOLength:NAPhase Fund 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 TotalPLN PL0 546,564 546,564 0 0 1,093,128000000Total0 546,564 546,564 0 0 1,093,128GOALS & OBJECTIVES P3‐5Pending MPO Board Adoption June 14, 2019March 6, 2019 FDOT Snapshot1008.B.1Packet Pg. 203Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
Collier MPO FY2020 ‐ FY2024 TIP4393144COLLIER COUNTY MPO FY 20222/2023‐2023/2024 UPWPProject Description:Prior Years Cost: 0Future Years Cost:0Total Project Cost:546,564Work Summary:TRANSPORTATION PLANNINGLRTP Ref:Lead Agency:MPOLength:NAPhase Fund 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 TotalPLN PL0 0 0 546,564 0 546,564000000Total0 0 0 546,564 0 546,564GOALS & OBJECTIVES P3‐5Pending MPO Board Adoption June 14, 2019March 6, 2019 FDOT Snapshot1018.B.1Packet Pg. 204Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
PART 1 SECTION C TRANSIT PROJECTS includesTransit Projects1028.B.1Packet Pg. 205Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
Collier MPO FY2020 ‐ FY2024 TIP4101131COLLIER COUNTY MPO TRANSIT PLANNING FTA SECTION 5305 (D)Project Description:FTA Section 5305 Metropolitan Planning Prior Years Cost: N/AFuture Years Cost:N/ATotal Project Cost:N/AWork Summary:MODAL SYSTEMS PLANNINGLRTP Ref:Lead Agency:MPOLength:N/APhase Fund 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 TotalPLNDU77,760 79,010 79,010 79,010 79,010393,800PLNLF9,720 9,877 9,877 9,877 9,87749,228PLNDDR 000000PLNDPTO9,720 9,877 9,877 9,877 9,87749,228PLNDS 00000000Total97,200 98,764 98,764 98,764 98,764 492,256TRANSIT CFP P6‐34Pending MPO Board Adoption June 14, 2019March 6, 2019 FDOT Snapshot1038.B.1Packet Pg. 206Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
Collier MPO FY2020 ‐ FY2024 TIP4101201COLLIER COUNTY FTA SECTION 5311 OPERATING ASSISTANCEProject Description:Prior Years Cost: N/AFuture Years Cost:N/ATotal Project Cost:N/AWork Summary:OPERATING/ADMIN ASSISTANCELRTP Ref:Lead Agency:COLLIER COUNTYLength:N/APhase Fund 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 TotalOPS DU404,500 366,460 364,222 404,525 379,7871,919,494OPS LF404,500 366,460 364,222 404,525 379,7871,919,49400000Total809,000 732,920 728,444 809,050 759,574 3,838,988Section 5311 Rural and Small Areas Paratransit Operating and Administrative ServiceTRANSIT CFP P6‐34Pending MPO Board Adoption June 14, 2019March 6, 2019 FDOT Snapshot1048.B.1Packet Pg. 207Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
Collier MPO FY2020 ‐ FY2024 TIP4101391COLLIER COUNTY STATE TRANSIT BLOCK GRANT OPERATING ASSISTANCEProject Description:State Transit Fixed‐Route Operating Assistance Block Grant Prior Years Cost: N/AFuture Years Cost:N/ATotal Project Cost:N/AWork Summary:OPERATING FOR FIXED ROUTELRTP Ref:Lead Agency:COLLIER COUNTYLength:N/APhase Fund 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 TotalOPS LF982,792 1,031,948 1,083,545 1,135,197 1,194,6085,428,090OPS DDR000 906,6230906,623OPS DPTO982,792 1,031,948 1,083,545 228,574 1,194,6084,521,467OPSDS 00000000Total982,792 1,031,948 1,083,545 1,135,197 1,194,608 5,428,090TRANSIT CFP P6‐34Pending MPO Board Adoption June 14, 2019March 6, 2019 FDOT Snapshot1058.B.1Packet Pg. 208Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
Collier MPO FY2020 ‐ FY2024 TIP4101461COLLIER COUNTY FTA SECTION 5307 CAPITAL ASSISTANCEProject Description:Prior Years Cost: N/AFuture Years Cost:N/ATotal Project Cost:N/AWork Summary:CAPITAL FOR FIXED ROUTELRTP Ref:TRANSIT CFP P6‐34TIP Amendment:Roll Forward 9‐9‐16Lead Agency:Length:N/A2013‐0923Phase Fund 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 TotalCAPFTA2,313,830 2,348,065 2,643,559 2,061,778 1,782,42011,149,652CAPLF578,458 587,016 660,890 515,445 445,6052,787,41400000Total2,892,288 2,935,081 3,304,449 2,577,2232,228,025 13,937,066Pending MPO Board Adoption June 14, 2019March 6, 2019 FDOT SnapshotCOLLIER COUNTY1068.B.1Packet Pg. 209Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
Collier MPO FY2020 ‐ FY2024 TIP4101462COLLIER COUNTY FTA SECTION 5307 OPERATING ASSISTANCEProject Description:Fixed Route Operating Assistance Prior Years Cost: N/AFuture Years Cost:N/ATotal Project Cost:N/AWork Summary:OPERATING FOR FIXED ROUTELRTP Ref:TRANSIT CFP P6‐34TIP Amendment:Roll Forward 9‐9‐16Lead Agency:COLLIER COUNTYLength:N/APhase Fund 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 TotalOPS FTA574,297 500,000 100,000 442,610 807,7002,424,607OPS LF574,297 500,000 100,000 442,610 807,7002,424,60700000Total1,148,594 1,000,000 200,000 885,220 1,615,400 4,849,214Pending MPO Board Adoption June 14, 2019March 6, 2019 FDOT Snapshot1078.B.1Packet Pg. 210Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
Collier MPO FY2020 ‐ FY2024 TIP4340301COLLIER CO./BONITA SPRINGS UZA FTA SECTION 5339 CAPITAL ASSISTANCEProject Description:CMC Priority 2012‐05; 2013‐04 Prior Years Cost: N/AFuture Years Cost:N/ATotal Project Cost:N/AWork Summary:CAPITAL FOR FIXED ROUTELRTP Ref:Lead Agency:COLLIER COUNTYLength:N/A TIP Amendment: 2015‐09182014‐0912‐1Phase Fund 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 TotalCAP FTA353,562 365,428 347,686 299,327 299,889 1,665,892CAP LF88,391 91,357 86,922 74,382 74,972 416,02400000Total441,953 456,785 434,608 373,709 374,861 2,081,916CFP‐CMS/ITS PROJECTS P6‐24 & APPENDIX A Pending MPO Board Adoption June 14, 2019March 6, 2019 FDOT Snapshot1088.B.1Packet Pg. 211Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
Collier MPO FY2020 ‐ FY2024 TIP4350292US41 FROM CR 846 (111TH AVE) TO NORTH OF 91ST AVEProject Description:CMC PRIORITY 2014‐01 (RELATED FPN 4350291 SIDEWALK 2016/17) Prior Years Cost:0INSTALL TOTAL OF 3 BUS SHELTERS (2 PENDING, 1 IN PLACE)Future Years Cost:0Total Project Cost:103,200Work Summary:PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION SHELTERLRTP Ref:Lead Agency:COLLIER COUNTYLength:N/APhase Fund 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 TotalCAP FTAT51,600000051,600CAP SU51,600000051,60000000Total103,2000000103,200CFP‐CMS/ITS P6‐24; APPENDICES A&DPending MPO Board Adoption June 14, 2019March 6, 2019 FDOT Snapshot1098.B.1Packet Pg. 212Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
PART 1 SECTION D TRANSPORTATION DISADVANTAGED PROJECTS 1108.B.1Packet Pg. 213Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
This section includes the Transportation Disadvantaged program projects in FY2019/20 – FY2023/24. The Community Transportation Coordinator (CTC) for the Transportation Disadvantaged program in Collier County is the Collier County Board of County Commissioners which provide services under a memorandum of agreement with the Florida Commission for the Transportation Disadvantaged. The Collier MPO, as the designated official planning agency for the program (DOPA) confirms that projects programmed through FY 2023/24 are all consistent with the Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) major update which was adopted by the Collier Local Coordinating Board (LCB) on October 24, 2018. The two Transportation Disadvantaged program projects are listed below. The amount of the MPO’s LCB assistance and the Transportation Disadvantaged Trust Fund (TDTF) for FY2019/20 was not yet available when this TIP was adopted. The amounts listed below are from FY2018/19 and will be adjusted accordingly via an Administrative Modification to the TIP once they become available. Collier MPO LCB Assistance The FY2018/19 Planning Grant Allocations for the Transportation Disadvantaged Trust Fund was $26,962. This grant allocation is used by the Collier MPO to support the LCB. Collier County FY 2018/19 TDTF / Trip and Equipment Grant ** The TDTF and Trip and Equipment Grant are funded by the Florida Commission for the Transportation Disadvantaged. The estimated amount of the grant is $946,571. These funds are used to cover a portion of the operating expenses for the Collier Area ParaTransit Program ** At time of publication, the TDT|F figures for FY 2019/20 were not available. The TIP will be amended through an Administrative Modification when these figures become available. 1118.B.1Packet Pg. 214Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
PART 1 SECTION E AVIATION PROJECTS includes Aviation Projects1128.B.1Packet Pg. 215Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
Collier MPO FY2020 ‐ FY2024 TIP4336321IMMOKALEE REGIONAL AIRPORT SECURITY ENHANCEMENTSProject Description:Prior Years Cost: 250,000Future Years Cost:0Total Project Cost:850,000Work Summary:AVIATION SECURITY PROJECTLRTP Ref:Lead Agency:COLLIER COUNTYLength:N/APhase Fund 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 TotalCAP LF120,0000000120,000CAPDDR 000000CAP DPTO480,0000000480,0000000Total600,0000000600,000APPENDIX A REVENUE FORECASTS TABLE 3 P5Pending MPO Board Adoption June 14, 2019March 6, 2019 FDOT Snapshot1138.B.1Packet Pg. 216Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
Collier MPO FY2020 ‐ FY2024 TIP4370631MARCO ISLAND APT NEW TERMINAL BUILDINGProject Description:Prior Years Cost: 6,670,275Future Years Cost:0Total Project Cost: 11,169,800Work Summary:AVIATION CAPACITY PROJECTLRTP Ref:Lead Agency:COLLIER COUNTYLength:N/APhase Fund 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 TotalCAPFAA 000000CAP LF899,9050000899,905CAP DDR3,599,62000003,599,620CAP DPTO000000000Total4,499,52500004,499,525APPENDIX A REVENUE FORECASTS TABLE 3 P5Pending MPO Board Adoption June 14, 2019March 6, 2019 FDOT Snapshot1148.B.1Packet Pg. 217Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
Collier MPO FY2020 ‐ FY2024 TIP4389771IMMOKALEE REGIONAL ARPT REHABILITATE RUNWAY 18/36Project Description:Prior Years Cost: 440,000Future Years Cost:0Total Project Cost: 8,165,000Work Summary:AVIATION PRESERVATION PROJECTLRTP Ref:Lead Agency:COLLIER COUNTYLength:N/APhase Fund 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 TotalCAPLF268,500 1,176,500 100,000001,545,000CAPDDR1,074,000 4,706,000 400,000006,180,00000000Total1,342,500 5,882,500 500,000 0 0 7,725,000APPENDIX A REVENUE FORECASTS TABLE 3 P5Pending MPO Board Adoption June 14, 2019March 6, 2019 FDOT Snapshot1158.B.1Packet Pg. 218Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
Collier MPO FY2020 ‐ FY2024 TIP4416751NAPLES MUNICIPAL AIRPORT SECURITY UPGRADESProject Description:Prior Years Cost: 0Future Years Cost:0Total Project Cost: 4,000,000Work Summary:AVIATION SECURITY PROJECTLRTP Ref:Lead Agency:NAPLES AIRPORT AUTHORITYLength:N/APhase Fund 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 TotalCAPLF 0000200,000200,000CAPDDR 0000800,000800,000CAP LF150,0000000150,000CAP DDR150,0000000150,000CAP FAA2,700,00000002,700,00000Total3,000,000 0 0 0 1,000,000 4,000,000APPENDIX A REVENUE FORECASTS TABLE 3 P5Pending MPO Board Adoption June 14, 2019March 6, 2019 FDOT Snapshot1168.B.1Packet Pg. 219Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
Collier MPO FY2020 ‐ FY2024 TIP4417651NAPLES MUNICIPAL AIRPORT RUNWAY 5‐23 DRAINAGE SWALE IMPROVEMENTSProject Description:Prior Years Cost: 0Future Years Cost:0Total Project Cost: 3,000,000Work Summary:AVIATION PRESERVATION PROJECTLRTP Ref:Lead Agency:NAPLES AIRPORT AUTHORITYLength:N/APhase Fund 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 TotalCAPLF150,0000000150,000CAPDDR150,0000000150,000CAPFAA2,700,00000002,700,0000000Total3,000,00000003,000,000APPENDIX A REVENUE FORECASTS TABLE 3 P5Pending MPO Board Adoption June 14, 2019March 6, 2019 FDOT Snapshot1178.B.1Packet Pg. 220Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
Collier MPO FY2020 ‐ FY2024 TIP4417831 IMMOKALEE ARPT TAXIWAY C EXTENSIONProject Description:Prior Years Cost: 0Future Years Cost:0Total Project Cost: 3,250,000Work Summary:AVIATION PRESERVATION PROJECTLRTP Ref:Lead Agency:COLLIER COUNTYLength:N/APhase Fund 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 TotalCAP LF12,500 150,000000162,500CAP DDR0 150,000000150,000CAP DPTO12,500000012,500CAP FAA225,000 2,700,0000002,925,000000Total250,000 3,000,000 0 0 0 3,250,000APPENDIX A REVENUE FORECASTS TABLE 3 P5Pending MPO Board Adoption June 14, 2019March 6, 2019 FDOT Snapshot1188.B.1Packet Pg. 221Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
Collier MPO FY2020 ‐ FY2024 TIP4417841IMMOKALEE ARPT ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY FOR RUNWAY 9/27 EXTENSIONProject Description:Prior Years Cost: 0Future Years Cost:0Total Project Cost:200,000Work Summary:AVIATION ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECTLRTP Ref:Lead Agency:COLLIER COUNTYLength:N/APhase Fund 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 TotalCAPFAA00 180,00000180,000CAPLF00 10,0000010,000CAPDDR00 10,0000010,0000000Total0 0 200,000 0 0 200,000APPENDIX A REVENUE FORECASTS TABLE 3 P5Pending MPO Board Adoption June 14, 2019March 6, 2019 FDOT Snapshot1198.B.1Packet Pg. 222Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
Collier MPO FY2020 ‐ FY2024 TIP4443941EVERGLADES AIRPARK SEAPLANE BASE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTProject Description:Note: On 9/27/18 CST phase moved to this FPN. Formerly was 4418151 Prior Years Cost:312,500Future Years Cost:0Total Project Cost: 1,100,000Work Summary:AVIATION CAPACITY PROJECTLRTP Ref:Lead Agency:COLLIER COUNTYLength:N/APhase Fund 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 TotalCAP DDR630,0000000630,000CAP DPTO000000CAP LF157,5000000157,5000000Total787,5000000787,500APPENDIX A REVENUE FORECASTS TABLE 3 P5Pending MPO Board Adoption June 14, 2019March 6, 2019 FDOT Snapshot1208.B.1Packet Pg. 223Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
PART II COLLIER COUNTY PROJECTS The projects included in this section of the TIP are generally located outside of the Cities of Everglades City, Marco Island and Naples. The projects are funded through a variety of funding sources including local gas taxes, road impact fees, state and federal grants, and developer commitments. Priorities are established by the Collier County Board of County Commissioners based upon an analysis of existing conditions and project needs. Some reconstruction and resurfacing projects may have been initially requested by citizens. Other projects are part of the overall maintenance and improvement program, utilizing various funds, with priorities established through careful and continuous monitoring of conditions. The five-year schedule of Capital Improvement Projects approved by the Board of County Commissioners is shown of the following page. All improvements are consistent with the Collier County Comprehensive Plan and Collier County Growth Management Plan. 1218.B.1Packet Pg. 224Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
Project Name
FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23
Project # SUMMARY OF PROJECTS Amount Amount Amount Amount Amount Amount
60168 Vanderbilt Beach Rd/Collier Blvd-8th Street 16,000 R 14,770 R 55,600 C - - 86,370
60201 Pine Ridge Rd (Livingston Intersection Improvement)500 D 250 D/M 5,000 A 2,450 C - 8,200
60211 Orange Blossom (Airport to Livingston)- 600 D 4,000 R/A 2,450 C - 7,050
60198 Veterans Memorial - 2,900 A/R 2,000 A 2,500 A - 7,400
60199 Vanderbilt Beach Rd (US41 to E of Goodlette)300 D - 8,900 C - - 9,200
60200 ****Goodland Road (CR 92A) Roadway Improvements - 6,100 C -- - 6,100
TBD 16th Street Bridge - - 8,000 D/C - - 8,000
60212 47th Ave NE Bridge - - 200 R 8,800 C - 9,000
TBD Airport Rd Vanderbilt Bch Rd to Immokalee Rd - - 3,000 D/M/A 10,000 D/M/A 7,839 C 20,839
60219 Whippoorwill 300 D 3,000 D/C -- - 3,300
60129 Wilson Benfield Ext (Lord's Way to City Gate N)- - 1,000 R 1,000 R 1,000 R 3,000
65061 Ruston Pointe 140 C - -- - 140
60214 Immokalee/Woodcrest Imp 200 C - -- - 200
60215 Triangle Blvd/Price St 200 R - -- - 200
60044C Oil Well (Immk - Everglades)- - -- - -
60144 Oil Well (Everglades to Oil Well Grade)900 A 300 A 300 A 300 A 300 A 2,100
60147 Randall/Immokalee Road Intersection - 650 D 500 R 6,000 A 2,000 A 9,150
68057 Collier Blvd (Green to GG Main Canal)2,000 D/R/A 2,000
TBD Goodlette Rd (VBR to Immokalee Rd)5,500 D/R/A 5,500
TBD Green Blvd (Santa Barbara Blvd to Sunshine Blvd)500 S 500
33563 Tiger Reserve 2,800 C - -- - 2,800
Contingency 25,174 - -- - 25,174
Total 46,514 28,570 88,500 33,500 19,139 216,223
Operations Improvements/Programs
66066 Bridge Repairs/Improvements 2,800 24,500 6,000 6,000 6,000 45,300
60131 Road Resurfacing 101/111 5,500 4,000 6,500 6,000 6,000 28,000
60128 Limerock Road Conversion 111 1,000 200 -- - 1,200
60077 Striping and Marking 800 950 950 950 950 4,600
60130 Wall/Barrier Replacement 100 500 250 250 250 1,350
60016 Intersection Safety/Capacity/Enhancements 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 10,000
60146 TMC Relocation Fund 310 400 - -- - 400
60197 RM Facility Fund 310 750 750 500 400 400 2,800
60172 Traffic Ops Upgrades/Enhancements 300 600 700 700 700 3,000
60189 LED Replacement Program 500 - -- - 500
60163 Traffic Studies/Advanced Planning 300 300 300 300 300 1,500
60118 Countywide Pathways/Sidewalks Non PIL /LAP 500 250 350 250 750 2,100
60037 Asset Mgmt 200 100 100 100 100 600
Subtotal Operations Improvements/Programs 15,150 34,150 17,650 16,950 17,450 101,350
60109 Planning Consultants 200 200
Impact Fee Refunds 368 400 400 400 400 1,968
Debt Service Payments 13,326 13,137 13,134 13,131 13,136 65,864
Total Funding Request All Funds 75,558 76,257 119,684 63,981 50,125 385,605
REVENUES
Impact Fees 13,600 14,000 14,500 15,000 15,500 72,600
Gas Tax Revenue 21,575 21,750 22,000 22,250 22,500 110,075
Grants/Reimbursements - - 1,500 4,000 - 5,500
DCA/Interlocal 62014 700 2,000 -- - 2,700
Transfer 001 to 313 -9,300 9,300 9,300 9,300 37,200
Transfer 001 to 310 8,556 --- - 8,556
Transfer 111 to 310 4,250 4,250 4,250 4,250 4,250 21,250
Interest Fund 313 Gas Tax 200 200 200 200 200 1,000
Interest Impact Fees 250 250 250 250 250 1,250
Carry Forward 313 7,066 - -- - 7,066
Carry Forward 310 (1,705) - -- - (1,705)
Carry Forward Impact Fee 22,783 - -- - 22,783
Potential Debt Funding/Unfunded Needs -26,295 69,509 10,594 - 106,398
Revenue Reduction (Less 5% Required by Law)(1,717) (1,788)(1,825) (1,863) (1,875) (9,068)
Total 5 Year Revenues 75,558 76,257 119,684 63,981 50,125 385,605
Beginning Carry Forward -
Fiscal Year Surplus/(Shortfall)- - -- - -
GRANT FUNDING SUMMARY
FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23
Vanderbilt 1,500 4,000
Total Grants 0 0 1,500 4,000 0
Key:
S = Study A = Advanced Construction
D = Design I = Inspection
M = Mitigation AM = Access Management
C = Construction LP = SIB Loan Repayment to State
R = ROW CBO = Constructed By Others
L = Litigation DBO = Designed By Others
Attachment D
FY19 - FY23 5 YEAR WORK PROGRAM/CIE (TIED TO FY19 ADOPTED BUDGET) **
(Dollars shown in Thousands)
Notes:
1) Expenditures: Based on current cost estimates.
2) Revenues: Based on current adopted Impact Fee Schedule, projected gas tax revenues,
budgeted general fundtransfer, and approved grants and developer contribution agreements.
**Debt Serviceand Gas Tax revenue arenot tied to budget.
"Highlighted projects are subject to debt scenarios to be discussed during upcoming budget
workshops"
5 cent fuel tax being used on bridges and intersection improvements
****Goodland (CR92A) in FY20 will recieve a transfer from Marco Project 60114 for $2M
122
8.B.1
Packet Pg. 225 Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year 2020 – 2024 Transportation
PART III CITY OF NAPLES PROJECTS The projects included in this section of the TIP are located inside the City of Naples. The projects are funded through a variety of funding sources including local gas taxes, road impact fees, state and federal grants, and developer commitments. Priorities are established by the Naples City Council based upon an analysis of existing conditions and project needs. Some reconstruction and resurfacing projects may have been initially requested by citizens. Other projects are part of the overall maintenance and capital improvement program, utilizing various funds, with priorities established through careful and continuous monitoring of conditions. The parts of Naples adopted operating budget related to street and traffic operations are shown on the next page. The fiscal year began October 1, 2018 and ends September 30, 2019. 1238.B.1Packet Pg. 226Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
On September 17, 2018 the Naples City Council adopted the operating budget for the City for the fiscal year
beginning October 1, 2018 and ending September 30, 2019. The table below illustrates the funding for the
Community Redevelopment Agency and the Streets and Traffic Fund.
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY-CRA (Fund 180)
18C14 8th Street S Improvements 2,500,000 2,000,000 0 0 0
19C06 5th Avenue N Interconnect 300,000 0 0 0 0
19C03 River Park Aquatic Center - Storage Area 20,000 0 0 0 0
19C24 River Park Fitness Equipment 30,000 30,000 0 0 0
19C10 Charlie C. Anthony Park Outdoor Fitness Equipment 132,500 0 0 0 0
1st Ave S Improvements - 370,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 0
TOTAL CRA FUND 2,982,500 2,400,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 0
STREETS & TRAFFIC FUND (Fund 190)
Annual Pavement Resurfacing Program
500,000 650,000 650,000 650,000 700,000
19U31 Alley Maintenance & Improvements 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000
19U29 Pedestrian & Bicycle Master Plan Projects 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000
19U21 Citywide ADA Accessibility Improvements 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000
19U01 Intersection/Signal System Improvements 0 150,000 475,000 175,000 425,000
19U07 City Road Bridge Improvements 175,000 150,000 150,000 100,000 0
19U08 Traffic Operations & Signal System Improvements 70,000 0 0 0 0
19U04 Vehicle Replacement 70,000 0 0 0 130,000
TOTAL STREETS AND TRAFFIC FUND 1,055,000 1,190,000 1,515,000 1,165,000 1,495,000
124
8.B.1
Packet Pg. 227 Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year 2020 – 2024 Transportation
PART IV CITY OF MARCO ISLAND PROJECTS The projects included in this section of the TIP are located inside the City of Marco Island. The projects are funded through a variety of funding sources including local gas taxes, road impact fees, state and federal grants, and developer commitments. Priorities are established by the Marco Island City Council based upon an analysis of existing conditions and project needs. Some reconstruction and resurfacing projects may have been initially requested by citizens. Other projects are part of the overall maintenance and improvement program, utilizing various funds, with priorities established through careful and continuous monitoring of conditions. Marco Island’s Five Year Capital Improvements Program Summary is shown on the following page. 1258.B.1Packet Pg. 228Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
TEM #INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AVAILABLE
BALANCE
FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 FY2022 FY2023 5YR FUNDING
TOTAL
1 16016 IT ‐ Network Equip Replacement 21,785 26,000 26,000 26,000 26,000 26,000 130,000
2 16017 IT ‐ SAN ‐ Offsite Storage Devices (2)16,000 7,200 7,200 7,200 7,200 7,200 36,000
4 16019 IT ‐ Crestron AirMedia Units (2)3,840 960 960 960 960 960 4,800
5 16020 IT ‐ Replacement Physical Servers (6)13,249 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 20,000
6 16021 IT ‐ Replacement Virtual Host (2)14,270 3,250 3,250 3,250 3,250 3,250 16,250
7 16022 IT ‐ Replacement Audio/Visual PTZ Cameras (5)8,251 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 17,500
8 18003 IT ‐ City Wide Hardware Replacement Program 19,441 84,240 84,240 84,240 84,240 84,240 421,200
IT Sub Total 96,835 129,150 129,150 129,150 129,150 129,150 645,750
TEM #PROJ
NMBR FIRE DEPARTMENT AVAILABLE
BALANCE
FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 FY2022 FY2023 5YR FUNDING
TOTAL
1 16002 Fire ‐ Firefighting Equip. ‐ Hose, nozzles, appliances 16,465 8,400 11,400 11,400 11,400 11,400 54,000
2 16003 Fire ‐ Mobile & Portable 800 Mhz radios 66,000 66,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 66,000
3 16004 Fire ‐ Medical Equipment ‐ Airway, Trauma, Medical 4,000 1,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 29,000
4 16005 Fire ‐ Cardiac Monitors 112,400 29,000 29,000 29,000 29,000 29,000 145,000
5 16006 Fire ‐ Thermal Imaging Cameras 2,160 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 22,500
6 16007 Fire ‐ Chest Compression Devices (2)18,200 9,100 9,100 9,100 9,100 9,100 45,500
7 16008 Fire ‐ Mobile Data / Mobile Computer replacement 11,074 5,640 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 5,640
8 16009 Fire ‐ Air Compressor ‐ St 51 1,200 550 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 550
9 16010 Fire ‐ Hurst Tool/ Jaws of Life (2)6,535 10,700 10,500 10,500 10,500 10,500 52,700
10 16011 Fire ‐ Smoke Generator ‐ For Training 1,400 700 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 700
11 16012 Fire ‐ Station Appliances 4,922 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 5,000
12 16013 Fire ‐ SCBA ‐ (6)14,400 7,200 7,200 7,200 7,200 7,200 36,000
13 16014 Fire ‐ Fire Station 50 Renovations (2018)1,486 560,000 560,000 560,000 560,000 560,000 2,800,000
14 16015 Fire ‐ Fire Station 51 (2018)‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Fire Sub Total 260,242 703,790 639,700 639,700 639,700 639,700 3,262,590
TEM #PUBLIC WORKS AVAILABLE
BALANCE
FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 FY2022 FY2023 5YR FUNDING
TOTAL
1 16023 PW ‐ West Winterberry Bridge Rehabilatation‐Design 600,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
2 16024 PW ‐ Annual Bridge Rehabilitation Project 699,245 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 1,500,000
3 16025 PW ‐ Bridge Replacement‐ W. Winterberry Bridge 2,035,745 767,260 767,260 767,260 ‐ ‐ 2,301,780
5 16027 PW ‐ Citywide Drainage Improvement Projects 299,723 302,000 302,000 302,000 302,000 302,000 1,510,000
6 16028 PW ‐ Master Plan Drainage Project ‐ Citywide 521,567 295,000 295,000 295,000 295,000 295,000 1,475,000
8 16030 PW ‐ Collier & San Marco Pathways‐ Design 345,800 90,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 450,000
9 16031 PW ‐ Street Resurfacing ‐ Citywide 435,600 500,000 500,000 500,000 1,267,260 1,267,260 4,034,520
13 16035 PW ‐ Bike Paths ‐ Committee Priority List Design 246,956 126,160 224,080 224,080 224,080 224,080 1,022,480
18 16038 PW ‐ Linear Trail Park ‐ Phase 3 (Grant)318,880 97,920 97,920
Public Works Subtotal 5,503,516 2,478,340 2,478,340 2,478,340 2,478,340 2,478,340 12,391,700
TEM #PARKS & RECREATION AVAILABLE
BALANCE
FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 FY2022 FY2023 5YR FUNDING
TOTAL
1 16080 REC‐ Re‐Pavement Winterberry Parking Lots(2)13,000 6,500 6,500 6,500 6,500 6,500 32,500
2 16081 REC‐ Re‐Seal & Re‐Stripe Racquet Center Parking lot 12,680 6,340 6,340 6,340 6,340 6,340 31,700
3 16082 REC‐ Replace Tennis court Irrigation System (2 Cts)6,379 2,800 2,800 2,800 2,800 2,800 14,000
4 16083 REC‐ Replace Heavy Duty Outside Garbage Cans (5 per yr) 6,235 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 20,000
5 16084 REC‐ Replace Outdoor Picnic Benches (4 per year)7,747 3,600 3,600 3,600 3,600 3,600 18,000
6 16085 REC Replace Park Benches (3 per Year)8,600 2,800 2,800 2,800 2,800 2,800 14,000
7 16086 REC Replace AC Units at Racquet Center ( 1 per year)11,227 4,800 4,800 4,800 4,800 4,800 24,000
8 16087 REC‐Park Fencing 3,891 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 17,500
9 16088 REC‐ Re‐Seal & Re Stripe Mackle Park Parking Lot 5,600 2,800 2,800 2,800 2,800 2,800 14,000
Parks & Rec. Sub Total 75,358 37,140 37,140 37,140 37,140 37,140 185,700
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS ‐ INFRASTRUCTURE AND OTHER
FIVE‐YEAR PROGRAM (FY 2019 ‐ FY 2023)
126
8.B.1
Packet Pg. 229 Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year 2020 – 2024 Transportation
PART V CITY OF EVERGLADES CITYCounty Road 29 (CR 29) runs through Everglades City. CR29 is also known as Collier Avenue from the northern city limit until it merges with Broadway and becomes known as Copeland Avenue. The City of Everglades continues to focus attention on needed stormwater drainage improvements and pavement replacements. A sidewalk project on Copeland Avenue from the southern city limit north to the intersection with Broadway is the only City of Everglades City project in the FY2020 - FY2024 TIP.1278.B.1Packet Pg. 230Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
PART VI FEDERAL FUNDING OBLIGATIONS IN COLLIER MPO AREA FOR THE PRECEEDING YEAR 1288.B.1Packet Pg. 231Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
PAGE 1FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DATE RUN: 10/02/2018OFFICE OF WORK PROGRAM TIME RUN: 08.45.25COLLIER MPO ANNUAL OBLIGATIONS REPORT MBROBLTP================HIGHWAYS================ITEM NUMBER:417540 1PROJECT DESCRIPTION:SR 29 FROM OIL WELL ROAD TO SR 82*NON-SIS*DISTRICT:01COUNTY:COLLIERTYPE OF WORK:PD&E/EMO STUDYROADWAY ID:03080000PROJECT LENGTH: 16.961MILANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 2/ 2/ 0FUNDCODE 2018____ _______________PHASE: PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOTSU675,338TOTAL 417540 1675,338TOTAL 417540 1675,338ITEM NUMBER:429898 1PROJECT DESCRIPTION:MARCO ISLAND SIDEWALKS AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS*NON-SIS*DISTRICT:01COUNTY:COLLIERTYPE OF WORK:SIDEWALKROADWAY ID:PROJECT LENGTH: .000LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 0/ 0/ 0FUNDCODE 2018____ _______________PHASE: CONSTRUCTION / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOTSU-500TOTAL 429898 1-500TOTAL 429898 1-500ITEM NUMBER:429899 1PROJECT DESCRIPTION:NEW MARKET ROAD FROM EAST MAIN STREET TO SR 29 N*NON-SIS*DISTRICT:01COUNTY:COLLIERTYPE OF WORK:SIDEWALKROADWAY ID:03580000PROJECT LENGTH: .010MILANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 2/ 0/ 0FUNDCODE 2018____ _______________PHASE: CONSTRUCTION / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY COLLIER COUNTYSU430,936TOTAL 429899 1430,936TOTAL 429899 1430,936ITEM NUMBER:429900 1PROJECT DESCRIPTION:GOLDEN GATE CITY SW AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS*NON-SIS*DISTRICT:01COUNTY:COLLIERTYPE OF WORK:SIDEWALKROADWAY ID:PROJECT LENGTH: .000LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 0/ 0/ 0FUNDCODE 2018____ _______________PHASE: CONSTRUCTION / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOTTALT-608TOTAL 429900 1-608TOTAL 429900 1-6081298.B.1Packet Pg. 232Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
PAGE 2FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DATE RUN: 10/02/2018OFFICE OF WORK PROGRAM TIME RUN: 08.45.25COLLIER MPO ANNUAL OBLIGATIONS REPORT MBROBLTP================HIGHWAYS================ITEM NUMBER:430873 1PROJECT DESCRIPTION:SR 45 (US 41) FROM CR 862 (VANDERBILT BCH RD) TO S PELICAN BAY BLVD*NON-SIS*DISTRICT:01COUNTY:COLLIERTYPE OF WORK:SIDEWALKROADWAY ID:03010000PROJECT LENGTH: .421MILANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 6/ 0/ 0FUNDCODE 2018____ _______________PHASE: CONSTRUCTION / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOTSU-11,474TOTAL 430873 1-11,474TOTAL 430873 1-11,474ITEM NUMBER:430876 1PROJECT DESCRIPTION:LANDMARK STREET FROM CR 92 (SAN MARCO RD) TO WINTERBERRY DRIVE*NON-SIS*DISTRICT:01COUNTY:COLLIERTYPE OF WORK:BIKE LANE/SIDEWALKROADWAY ID:PROJECT LENGTH: .000LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 0/ 0/ 0FUNDCODE 2018____ _______________PHASE: CONSTRUCTION / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOTTALU-1,000TOTAL 430876 1-1,000TOTAL 430876 1-1,000ITEM NUMBER:430878 1PROJECT DESCRIPTION:CR 953/BARFIELD DR FROM CR 92 (SAN MARCO RD) TO INLET DRIVE*NON-SIS*DISTRICT:01COUNTY:COLLIERTYPE OF WORK:SIDEWALKROADWAY ID:03000601PROJECT LENGTH: 1.100MILANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 4/ 0/ 0FUNDCODE 2018____ _______________PHASE: CONSTRUCTION / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY CITY OF MARCO ISLANDTALU171,760TOTAL 430878 1171,760TOTAL 430878 1171,760ITEM NUMBER:430879 1PROJECT DESCRIPTION:EAST NAPLES SIDEWALKS AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS*NON-SIS*DISTRICT:01COUNTY:COLLIERTYPE OF WORK:SIDEWALKROADWAY ID:03000052PROJECT LENGTH: .201MILANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 3/ 0/ 0FUNDCODE 2018____ _______________PHASE: CONSTRUCTION / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOTTALU-579TOTAL 430879 1-579TOTAL 430879 1-5791308.B.1Packet Pg. 233Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
PAGE 3FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DATE RUN: 10/02/2018OFFICE OF WORK PROGRAM TIME RUN: 08.45.25COLLIER MPO ANNUAL OBLIGATIONS REPORT MBROBLTP================HIGHWAYS================ITEM NUMBER:430922 1PROJECT DESCRIPTION:PINECREST ELEMENTARY SRTS SAFETY SIDEWALKS*NON-SIS*DISTRICT:01COUNTY:COLLIERTYPE OF WORK:SIDEWALKROADWAY ID:PROJECT LENGTH: .000LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 0/ 0/ 0FUNDCODE 2018____ _______________PHASE: CONSTRUCTION / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOTTALT-27,533TOTAL 430922 1-27,533TOTAL 430922 1-27,533ITEM NUMBER:431295 1PROJECT DESCRIPTION:LINEAR PARK PHASE II*NON-SIS*DISTRICT:01COUNTY:COLLIERTYPE OF WORK:BIKE PATH/TRAILROADWAY ID:03000000PROJECT LENGTH: 1.080MILANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 0/ 0/ 0FUNDCODE 2018____ _______________PHASE: CONSTRUCTION / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY CITY OF MARCO ISLANDSA422,592PHASE: CONSTRUCTION / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOTSA76TOTAL 431295 1422,668TOTAL 431295 1422,668ITEM NUMBER:431895 1PROJECT DESCRIPTION:8TH STREET NE BRIDGE FROM GOLDEN GATE BLVD TO RANDALL BLVD*NON-SIS*DISTRICT:01COUNTY:COLLIERTYPE OF WORK:NEW BRIDGE CONSTRUCTIONROADWAY ID:03000000PROJECT LENGTH: 3.212MILANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 0/ 0/ 2FUNDCODE 2018____ _______________PHASE: PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOTSU9,788PHASE: CONSTRUCTION / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOTSA3,968,006TOTAL 431895 13,977,794TOTAL 431895 13,977,794ITEM NUMBER:433173 1PROJECT DESCRIPTION:SR 84 (DAVIS BLVD) FROM COUNTY BARN RD TO SANTA BARBARA BLVD*NON-SIS*DISTRICT:01COUNTY:COLLIERTYPE OF WORK:WIDEN/RESURFACE EXIST LANESROADWAY ID:03001000PROJECT LENGTH: 1.009MILANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 3/ 3/ 0FUNDCODE 2018____ _______________PHASE: CONSTRUCTION / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOTSU-4,015TOTAL 433173 1-4,015TOTAL 433173 1-4,0151318.B.1Packet Pg. 234Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
PAGE 4FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DATE RUN: 10/02/2018OFFICE OF WORK PROGRAM TIME RUN: 08.45.25COLLIER MPO ANNUAL OBLIGATIONS REPORT MBROBLTP================HIGHWAYS================ITEM NUMBER:433177 1PROJECT DESCRIPTION:CR 886 (GOLDEN GATE) AT LIVINGSTON RD*NON-SIS*DISTRICT:01COUNTY:COLLIERTYPE OF WORK:ADD TURN LANE(S)ROADWAY ID:03511000PROJECT LENGTH: .140MILANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 6/ 6/ 1FUNDCODE 2018____ _______________PHASE: CONSTRUCTION / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY COLLIER COUNTYSU328,005TOTAL 433177 1 328,005TOTAL 433177 1 328,005ITEM NUMBER:433180 1PROJECT DESCRIPTION:ARTERIAL MONITORING CAMERAS*NON-SIS*DISTRICT:01COUNTY:COLLIERTYPE OF WORK:ITS SURVEILLANCE SYSTEMROADWAY ID:PROJECT LENGTH: .000LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 0/ 0/ 0FUNDCODE 2018____ _______________PHASE: CONSTRUCTION / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOTSU1,000PHASE: GRANTS AND MISCELLANEOUS / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY COLLIER COUNTYSU300,000TOTAL 433180 1 301,000TOTAL 433180 1 301,000ITEM NUMBER:433181 1PROJECT DESCRIPTION:ST ANNS SCHOOL SIDEWALKS AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS*NON-SIS*DISTRICT:01COUNTY:COLLIERTYPE OF WORK:SIDEWALKROADWAY ID:PROJECT LENGTH: .000LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 0/ 0/ 0FUNDCODE 2018____ _______________PHASE: PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOTSU-2,392PHASE: CONSTRUCTION / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOTSU-27,413TOTAL 433181 1 -29,805TOTAL 433181 1 -29,805ITEM NUMBER:433185 1PROJECT DESCRIPTION:HARBOUR DR FROM CRAYTON RD TO BINNACLE DR*NON-SIS*DISTRICT:01COUNTY:COLLIERTYPE OF WORK:SIDEWALKROADWAY ID:03516000PROJECT LENGTH: .315MILANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 1/ 0/ 0FUNDCODE 2018____ _______________PHASE: RAILROAD AND UTILITIES / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOTSA142,349PHASE: CONSTRUCTION / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOTSA245,612TOTAL 433185 1 387,961TOTAL 433185 1 387,9611328.B.1Packet Pg. 235Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
PAGE 5FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DATE RUN: 10/02/2018OFFICE OF WORK PROGRAM TIME RUN: 08.45.25COLLIER MPO ANNUAL OBLIGATIONS REPORT MBROBLTP================HIGHWAYS================ITEM NUMBER:433186 1PROJECT DESCRIPTION:2ND STREET SOUTH FROM 11TH AVENUE SOUTH TO 6TH AVENUE SOUTH*NON-SIS*DISTRICT:01COUNTY:COLLIERTYPE OF WORK:SIDEWALKROADWAY ID:PROJECT LENGTH: .000LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 0/ 0/ 0FUNDCODE 2018____ _______________PHASE: PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOTSU-17,559PHASE: CONSTRUCTION / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOTSU-36,397TOTAL 433186 1 -53,956TOTAL 433186 1 -53,956ITEM NUMBER:433188 1PROJECT DESCRIPTION:3RD STREET NORTH FROM CENTRAL AVENUE TO 7TH AVE NORTH*NON-SIS*DISTRICT:01COUNTY:COLLIERTYPE OF WORK:SIDEWALKROADWAY ID:PROJECT LENGTH: .000LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 0/ 0/ 0FUNDCODE 2018____ _______________PHASE: PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOTSU-13,619PHASE: CONSTRUCTION / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOTSU-40,899TOTAL 433188 1 -54,518TOTAL 433188 1 -54,518ITEM NUMBER:433190 1PROJECT DESCRIPTION:MOORING LINE DR FROM BRIDGE #030125 TO US 41*NON-SIS*DISTRICT:01COUNTY:COLLIERTYPE OF WORK:SIDEWALKROADWAY ID:03634001PROJECT LENGTH: .617MILANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 4/ 0/ 0FUNDCODE 2018____ _______________PHASE: CONSTRUCTION / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOTSU-33,171TOTAL 433190 1 -33,171TOTAL 433190 1 -33,171ITEM NUMBER:434990 1PROJECT DESCRIPTION:GOLDEN GATE VARIOUS LOCATIONS*NON-SIS*DISTRICT:01COUNTY:COLLIERTYPE OF WORK:SIDEWALKROADWAY ID:03000000PROJECT LENGTH: .001MILANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 0/ 0/ 0FUNDCODE 2018____ _______________PHASE: PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY COLLIER COUNTYSU55,560TOTAL 434990 1 55,560TOTAL 434990 1 55,5601338.B.1Packet Pg. 236Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
PAGE 6FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DATE RUN: 10/02/2018OFFICE OF WORK PROGRAM TIME RUN: 08.45.25COLLIER MPO ANNUAL OBLIGATIONS REPORT MBROBLTP================HIGHWAYS================ITEM NUMBER:435029 1PROJECT DESCRIPTION:US 41 FROM CR 846 (111TH AVE) TO N OF 91ST AVE*NON-SIS*DISTRICT:01COUNTY:COLLIERTYPE OF WORK:SIDEWALKROADWAY ID:03010000PROJECT LENGTH: 1.241MILANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 6/ 0/ 0FUNDCODE 2018____ _______________PHASE: PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOTSU36,048TOTAL 435029 136,048TOTAL 435029 136,048ITEM NUMBER:435030 1PROJECT DESCRIPTION:SUNSHINE BLVD FROM 17TH AVE SW TO GREEN BLVD*NON-SIS*DISTRICT:01COUNTY:COLLIERTYPE OF WORK:SIDEWALKROADWAY ID:03000000PROJECT LENGTH: .001MILANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 0/ 0/ 0FUNDCODE 2018____ _______________PHASE: PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY COLLIER COUNTYSU42,546TOTAL 435030 142,546TOTAL 435030 142,546ITEM NUMBER:435042 1PROJECT DESCRIPTION:YELLOWBIRD ST FROM JAMAICA RD TO COLLIER BLVD*NON-SIS*DISTRICT:01COUNTY:COLLIERTYPE OF WORK:SIDEWALKROADWAY ID:03000000PROJECT LENGTH: .001MILANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 0/ 0/ 0FUNDCODE 2018____ _______________PHASE: CONSTRUCTION / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY CITY OF MARCO ISLANDTALU408,518PHASE: CONSTRUCTION / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOTTALU1,000TOTAL 435042 1409,518TOTAL 435042 1409,518ITEM NUMBER:435118 1PROJECT DESCRIPTION:CR 862 (VANDERBILT) FROM CR 901 TO GULF PAVILLION DR*NON-SIS*DISTRICT:01COUNTY:COLLIERTYPE OF WORK:BIKE LANE/SIDEWALKROADWAY ID:03550000PROJECT LENGTH: .674MILANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 2/ 0/ 0FUNDCODE 2018____ _______________PHASE: PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY COLLIER COUNTYSU49,729TOTAL 435118 149,729TOTAL 435118 149,7291348.B.1Packet Pg. 237Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
PAGE 7FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DATE RUN: 10/02/2018OFFICE OF WORK PROGRAM TIME RUN: 08.45.25COLLIER MPO ANNUAL OBLIGATIONS REPORT MBROBLTP================HIGHWAYS================ITEM NUMBER:435368 1PROJECT DESCRIPTION:CR 846/IMMOKALEE RD AT RANDALL BLVD*NON-SIS*DISTRICT:01COUNTY:COLLIERTYPE OF WORK:PD&E/EMO STUDYROADWAY ID:03590000PROJECT LENGTH: .200MILANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 6/ 0/ 0FUNDCODE 2018____ _______________PHASE: PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOTSU9,933TOTAL 435368 19,933TOTAL 435368 19,933ITEM NUMBER:436585 1PROJECT DESCRIPTION:SR 84 (DAVIS BLVD) FROM SR 90 (US 41) TO AIRPORT PULLING RD*NON-SIS*DISTRICT:01COUNTY:COLLIERTYPE OF WORK:RESURFACINGROADWAY ID:03001000PROJECT LENGTH: .952MILANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 6/ 6/ 0FUNDCODE 2018____ _______________PHASE: CONSTRUCTION / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOTSA805,855TOTAL 436585 1805,855TOTAL 436585 1805,855ITEM NUMBER:437185 1PROJECT DESCRIPTION:NAPLES BEACH ACCESS SIDEWALKS AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS*NON-SIS*DISTRICT:01COUNTY:COLLIERTYPE OF WORK:SIDEWALKROADWAY ID:PROJECT LENGTH: .000LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 0/ 0/ 0FUNDCODE 2018____ _______________PHASE: PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOTSU58,651TOTAL 437185 158,651TOTAL 437185 158,651ITEM NUMBER:440128 1PROJECT DESCRIPTION:N 15TH ST (SR 29) INTERSECTION LIGHTING RETROFIT*NON-SIS*DISTRICT:01COUNTY:COLLIERTYPE OF WORK:LIGHTINGROADWAY ID:03080000PROJECT LENGTH: .200MILANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 2/ 0/ 0FUNDCODE 2018____ _______________PHASE: PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOTHSP-6,863PHASE: CONSTRUCTION / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOTHSP100,387TOTAL 440128 193,524TOTAL 440128 193,524TOTAL DIST: 018,039,667TOTAL HIGHWAYS8,039,6671358.B.1Packet Pg. 238Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
PAGE 8FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DATE RUN: 10/02/2018OFFICE OF WORK PROGRAM TIME RUN: 08.45.25COLLIER MPO ANNUAL OBLIGATIONS REPORT MBROBLTP================PLANNING================ITEM NUMBER:439314 1PROJECT DESCRIPTION:COLLIER COUNTY MPO FY 2016/2017-2017/2018 UPWP*NON-SIS*DISTRICT:01COUNTY:COLLIERTYPE OF WORK:TRANSPORTATION PLANNINGROADWAY ID:PROJECT LENGTH: .000LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 0/ 0/ 0FUNDCODE 2018____ _______________PHASE: PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: RESPONSIBLE AGENCY NOT AVAILABLEPL268,091TOTAL 439314 1268,091TOTAL 439314 1268,091ITEM NUMBER:439314 2PROJECT DESCRIPTION:COLLIER COUNTY MPO FY 2018/2019-2019/2020 UPWP*NON-SIS*DISTRICT:01COUNTY:COLLIERTYPE OF WORK:TRANSPORTATION PLANNINGROADWAY ID:PROJECT LENGTH: .000LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 0/ 0/ 0FUNDCODE 2018____ _______________PHASE: PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: RESPONSIBLE AGENCY NOT AVAILABLEPL161,532SU200,000TOTAL 439314 2361,532TOTAL 439314 2361,532TOTAL DIST: 01629,623TOTAL PLANNING629,6231368.B.1Packet Pg. 239Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
PAGE 9FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DATE RUN: 10/02/2018OFFICE OF WORK PROGRAM TIME RUN: 08.45.25COLLIER MPO ANNUAL OBLIGATIONS REPORT MBROBLTP================TRANSIT================ITEM NUMBER:427949 4PROJECT DESCRIPTION:BUS SHELTERS AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS*NON-SIS*DISTRICT:01COUNTY:COLLIERTYPE OF WORK:PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION SHELTERROADWAY ID:PROJECT LENGTH: .000LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 0/ 0/ 0FUNDCODE 2018____ _______________PHASE: GRANTS AND MISCELLANEOUS / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: RESPONSIBLE AGENCY NOT AVAILABLESU274,000TOTAL 427949 4 274,000TOTAL 427949 4 274,000ITEM NUMBER:433179 1PROJECT DESCRIPTION:COLLIER AREA TRANSIT ITS PHASE III*NON-SIS*DISTRICT:01COUNTY:COLLIERTYPE OF WORK:URBAN CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTSROADWAY ID:PROJECT LENGTH: .000LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 0/ 0/ 0FUNDCODE 2018____ _______________PHASE: GRANTS AND MISCELLANEOUS / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: RESPONSIBLE AGENCY NOT AVAILABLESU316,250TOTAL 433179 1 316,250TOTAL 433179 1 316,250TOTAL DIST: 01 590,250TOTAL TRANSIT 590,2501378.B.1Packet Pg. 240Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
PAGE 10FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DATE RUN: 10/02/2018OFFICE OF WORK PROGRAM TIME RUN: 08.45.25COLLIER MPO ANNUAL OBLIGATIONS REPORT MBROBLTP================MISCELLANEOUS================ITEM NUMBER:433174 1PROJECT DESCRIPTION:TMOC SOFTWARE UPDATE*NON-SIS*DISTRICT:01COUNTY:COLLIERTYPE OF WORK:TMC SOFTWARE & SYSTEM INTEGRATROADWAY ID:PROJECT LENGTH: .000LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 0/ 0/ 0FUNDCODE 2018____ _______________PHASE: GRANTS AND MISCELLANEOUS / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY COLLIER COUNTYSU97,065TOTAL 433174 197,065TOTAL 433174 197,065ITEM NUMBER:433178 1PROJECT DESCRIPTION:TMOC VIDEO WALL REPLACEMENT*NON-SIS*DISTRICT:01COUNTY:COLLIERTYPE OF WORK:TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT CENTERSROADWAY ID:PROJECT LENGTH: .000LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 0/ 0/ 0FUNDCODE 2018____ _______________PHASE: GRANTS AND MISCELLANEOUS / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY COLLIER COUNTYSU431,905TOTAL 433178 1431,905TOTAL 433178 1431,905ITEM NUMBER:438094 1PROJECT DESCRIPTION:SIGNAL PRE-EMPTION FOR THE CITY OF NAPLES*NON-SIS*DISTRICT:01COUNTY:COLLIERTYPE OF WORK:TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES/SYSTEMROADWAY ID:03000000PROJECT LENGTH: .001MILANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 0/ 0/ 0FUNDCODE 2018____ _______________PHASE: GRANTS AND MISCELLANEOUS / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY CITY OF NAPLESSU233,200TOTAL 438094 1233,200TOTAL 438094 1233,200TOTAL DIST: 01762,170TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS762,170GRAND TOTAL 10,021,7101388.B.1Packet Pg. 241Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
PART VII FTA OBLIGATED FUNDS FOR FY 2018 The Federal Transit Administration (FTA) annually produces a list of projects for which federal funds have been obligated in the preceding year. The list is shown on the next page. 1398.B.1Packet Pg. 242Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
FY 2018 Obligated FTA FundsDescriptionFTA FL# Awarded Amount Executed DateFY17 FTA 5307FL 2018‐034 $2,469,778 May 18, 2018FY18 FTA 5307 FL 2018‐098 $2,590,120 September 12, 2018FY17 FTA 5339 FL 2018‐008 $299,889 March 1, 20181408.B.1Packet Pg. 243Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
PART VIII COLLIER MPO FUNDING SUMMARY The FDOT Five-Year TIP Funding Summary for the Collier MPO is shown on the following page. 1418.B.1Packet Pg. 244Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
FundFund Name<2020 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024>2024All YearsTOTAL OUTSIDE YEARS36,980,82700000036,980,827ACNPADVANCE CONSTRUCTION NHPP0 1,786,4631,258,8220 9,803,761 3,394,93519,176,76935,420,750ACSAADVANCE CONSTRUCTION (SA)14,694,69300000014,694,693ACSSADVANCE CONSTRUCTION (SS,HSP)00 1,496,4400000 1,496,440ACSUADVANCE CONSTRUCTION (SU)491,574000000491,574BNIR INTRASTATE R/W & BRIDGE BONDS0 7,283,65300 1,323,00000 8,606,653BRRP STATE BRIDGE REPAIR & REHAB27,399 260,0002,393,322151,340200,000920,9200 3,952,981CIGP COUNTY INCENTIVE GRANT PROGRAM 0 0 1,500,0000 4,928,10000 6,428,100D UNRESTRICTED STATE PRIMARY11,067,1453,089,9743,104,6292,601,4502,601,4502,601,4500 25,066,098DDR DISTRICT DEDICATED REVENUE20,319,991 12,606,53514,918,9138,730,94618,911,0058,329,9355,198,40889,015,733DI ST. - S/W INTER/INTRASTATE HWY1,311,1710 15,0000 44,910,92395,181,53316,645,864158,064,491DIH STATE IN-HOUSE PRODUCT SUPPORT1,381,258203,20941,060 97,290 76,632 68,640 23,560 1,891,649DPTO STATE - PTO10,043,6401,485,0121,041,8251,093,422238,451 1,204,4850 15,106,835DS STATE PRIMARY HIGHWAYS & PTO13,165,276111,000111,000319,905111,0003,182,6240 17,000,805DSB2 EVERGLADES PKY/ALLIGATOR ALLEY0 4,751,0000 88,368,219000 93,119,219DU STATE PRIMARY/FEDERAL REIMB5,124,251 482,260445,470443,232 483,535458,7970 7,437,545FAAFEDERAL AVIATION ADMIN508,7472,925,0002,700,000180,000000 6,313,747FTAFEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION 32,328,9703,253,5553,195,751 3,042,8862,804,2773,001,5860 47,627,025FTAT FHWA TRANSFER TO FTA (NON-BUD)0 51,6000000051,600GFSAGF STPBG ANY AREA609,339000000609,339GMR GROWTH MANAGEMENT FOR SIS1,799,60829,931,8440000031,731,452IMD INTERSTATE MAINTENANCE DISCRET204,989000000204,989LF LOCAL FUNDS25,105,4884,496,4245,408,7232,402,9167,510,7267,555,0440 52,479,321LFP LOCAL FUNDS FOR PARTICIPATING 52,500 105,14600000157,646PL METRO PLAN (85% FA; 15% OTHER)709,379546,564546,564546,564546,56400 2,895,635REPE REPURPOSED FEDERAL EARMARKS3,756,6980000003,756,698SASTP, ANY AREA100,0000 52,650 2,026,5042,082,29900 4,261,453SIWR 2015 SB2514A-STRATEGIC INT SYS0 4,029,717000004,029,717SR2T SAFE ROUTES - TRANSFER55,73800 663,333000 719,071SU STP, URBAN AREAS > 200K1,721,6234,663,4934,730,5604,713,3474,734,1543,215,3900 23,778,567TALT TRANSPORTATION ALTS- ANY AREA0 150,00020,000 124,692 1,150,00000 1,444,692TALU TRANSPORTATION ALTS- >200K0 230,3110 372,940000 603,251TCSP TRANS, COMMUNITY & SYSTEM PRES754,574000000754,574TO02 EVERGLADES PARKWAY62,669,6244,165,0004,170,0004,175,0004,185,0004,185,00020,925,000104,474,624Grand Total244,984,50286,607,76047,150,729120,053,986106,600,877133,300,33961,969,601 800,667,794Effective Date: 03/06/2019 Florida Department of Transportation Run: 03/26/2019 16.21.415 Year TIP - Fund Summary DISTRICT 1 1428.B.1Packet Pg. 245Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
PART IX APPENDICES 1438.B.1Packet Pg. 246Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
APPENDIX A FDOT’S STRATEGIC INTERMODAL SYSTEM FIRST FIVE YEAR PLAN FY2018/19 – FY2022/23 SECOND FIVE YEAR PLAN FY2023/24 – FY2027/28 COST FEASIBLE PLAN FY2028/29 – FY2044/45 The following pages illustrate the FDOT Strategic Intermodal System (SIS) Plans for District 1. The plans may be downloaded at: https://www.fdot.gov/planning/systems/programs/mspi/plans/default.shtm 1448.B.1Packet Pg. 247Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
FY
FY
2022/20232018/2019
Multi-Modal
F F Y P
Strategic Intermodal System Funding Strategy
Capacity Projects on2018/2019 throug h FY 2022/2023the Strategic Intermodal System
State of Florida Department of Transportation
145
8.B.1
Packet Pg. 248 Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
First Five Year Plan*
The First Five Plan illustrates projects on the SIS that are
funded by the legislature in the Work Program (Year 1)
and projects that are programmed for proposed funding in
the next 2 to 5 years.
Update Cycle: Adopted annually by the
Legislature, effective July 1st each year
with the start of the new fiscal year.
*SIS Capacity Projects included in the
Adopted Five-Year Work Program
Cost Feasible Plan
The Cost Feasible Plan illustrates projects on the SIS that are considered financially feasible
during the last fifteen years (years 11 to 25) of the State’s Long Range Plan, based on current revenue
forecasts. Projects in this plan could move forward into the Second Five as funds become available or
backwards into the Needs Plan if revenues fall short of projections.
Update Cycle: Typically updated every 2 to 3 years as new revenue forecasts become available.
Second Five Year Plan
Typically updated
annually, usually in late summer
following the First Five Plan update.
The FDOT Systems Planning Office produces a document set known as the SIS Funding Strategy, which includes three inter-
related sequential documents that identify potential Strategic Intermodal System (SIS) Capacity Improvement projects in vari-
ous stages of development. All of the projects identified within the SIS Funding Strategy are considered financially feasible for
implementation within the next 25 year period. The Florida Legislature established the SIS in 2003 to enhance Florida’s
economic prosperity and competitiveness. The system encompasses transportation facilities of statewide and interregional
significance, and is focused on the efficient movement of passengers and freight. The combined document set, as illustrated
below, illustrates projects that are funded (Year 1), programmed for proposed funding (Years 2 through 5), planned to be
funded (Years 6 through 10), and considered financially feasible based on projected State revenues (Years 11 through 25).
The Second Five Year Plan illustrates projects that are
planned to be funded in the five years (Years 6 through
beyond the Adopted Work ProgramH[FOXGLQJ 7XUQSLNH
3URMHFWVLQWKLVplan could move IRUZDUG LQWRWKH
)LUVW)LYH<HDUPlan as funds become available.
Update Cycle:
146
8.B.1
Packet Pg. 249 Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
MAP IDDESCRIPTIONTOTALDISTRICTMANAGED20192020202120222023FACILITYTOTALLOCALFUNDSTOTALSTATEMANAGEDDistrict 1 SIS Interstate Plan ENV PD&E PE ROW CON4301855Fgt I-4 at SR 33 Interchange ModificationModify Interchange$5,000$5$10,000$0$0$5,006$0$10,0004425121I-4 (SR 400) from W of SR 570 (polk Parkway) to W of US 27 InterchangeStudy$3,010$0$0$0$0$3,010$0$04425122I-4 (SR 400) from W of SR 570 (polk Parkway) to W of US 27 InterchangeProject Dev. & Env.$4,040$0$0$0$0$4,040$0$04301853I-4 at SR 33 Interchange ModificationModify Interchange$3,302$1,400$50$0$0$1,722$0$3,0302012153I-4 at SR 557Modify Interchange$4,297$83,144$0$2,400$0$2,406$0$87,4352010325I-75 (SR 93) at US 301 InterchangeModify Interchange$10,426$190,533$0$0$0$271$0$200,6884425193I-75 (SR 93) from Collier/lee County Line to SR 78 (bayshore Dr)Project Dev. & Env.$4,040$0$0$0$0$4,040$0$04425191I-75 (SR 93) from E of SR 951 to SR 78 (bayshore Dr)Study$3,030$0$0$0$0$3,030$0$04425192I-75 (SR 93) from E of SR 951 to Collier/lee County LineProject Dev. & Env.$3,040$0$0$0$0$3,040$0$04425181I-75 (SR 93) from N River Rd (CR 777) to Moccasin Wallow RdStudy$3,030$0$0$0$0$3,030$0$04425182I-75 (SR 93) from N University Pkwy to Moccasin WallowProject Dev. & Env.$3,010$0$0$0$0$3,010$0$04425183I-75 (SR 93) from N River Rd to SR 681Project Dev. & Env.$3,010$0$0$0$0$3,010$0$04425184I-75 (SR 93) from SR 681 to N of University ParkwayProject Dev. & Env.$2,010$0$0$0$0$2,010$0$02012775I-75 (SR93) at Bee Ridge RoadModify Interchange$2,172$0$2,453$10,370$5,834$258$0$20,5704062253I-75 at Corkscrew InterchangeModify Interchange$60$0$0$0$0$0$0$604062256I-75 at Corkscrew InterchangeAdd Turn Lane$7,058$0$0$0$0$7,058$0$04206132I-75 at Fruitville Road/CR 780Modify Interchange$605$0$750$0$0$605$0$7502010326I-75 at SR 64Modify Interchange$3,001$0$0$0$0$2,851$0$1502010322I-75 at SR 70 InterchangeModify Interchange$1,205$0$3,500$0$0$3,501$0$1,2042012773I-75 at SR 72 (clark Road) InterchangeModify Interchange$846$0$70,676$0$0$846$0$70,6764130651I-75 at SR 884 (colonial Blvd) InterchangeModify Interchange$1,955$51,756$0$2,350$0$2,461$0$53,6004258432I-75 at SR 951Modify Interchange$8,329$1,472$92,061$0$2,800$103,730$0$9314062254I-75 from S of Corkscrew Road to S of Daniels ParkwayAdd 2 to Build 6 Lanes$1,193$0$0$0$0$8$0$1,1854425211Interstate Program Manager - GecProject Dev. & Env.$2,000$0$2,000$2,000$2,000$2,000$0$6,000ANNUAL TOTALS$79,669$328,310$181,490$17,120$10,634$160,943$0$456,279All Values in Thousands of "As Programmed" DollarsPE - Preliminary Engineering;ROW - Right-of-Way;PD&E - Project Development & Environmental;TOTAL LOCAL FUNDS include all funds that start with LF fund code;CON - Construction & Support (may Include Grants);ENV - Environmental Mitigation;1478.B.1Packet Pg. 250Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
"""""""""""""£¤27§¨¦4£¤27£¤27§¨¦75§¨¦75§¨¦75§¨¦275£¤441£¤17430185343018552010322420613220127752012773201032520103264062254413065140622534258432AB80AB80AB70AB70AB82AB29AB60AB60AB64AB70AB29AB71040622564425182442518344251844425121442512220121534425211£¤17442518144251934425191PolkCollierLeeHendryGladesHighlandsHardeeManateeDe SotoOkeechobeeSarasotaCharlotteFirst Five YearsInterstate PlanDISTRICT 1®LEGENDProjects color coded by highest project phase.Some projects may overlap on map. Project costs are subject to change.NOTESHIGHWAYCapacity Improvement ProjectsSTRATEGIC INTERMODAL SYSTEMFY 2018/2019 through FY 2022/2023(as of July 1, 2018)Adopted Work Program0204010MilesProject PhaseProject Development & EnvironmentPreliminary EngineeringRight-Of-WayConstructionEnvironmental MitigationItem Segment 4425192 does not have mapping data available1488.B.1Packet Pg. 251Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
MAP IDDESCRIPTIONTOTALDISTRICTMANAGED20192020202120222023FACILITYTOTALLOCALFUNDSTOTALSTATEMANAGEDDistrict 1 SIS Non-Interstate Plan ENV PD&E PE ROW CON4365631North Jones Loop Rd from Burnt Store Road to Piper RoadProject Dev. & Env.$0$0$1,220$0$0$1,220$0$04389021SR 15/700 (US 98/441) at Se 18th Terr RoundaboutModify Intersection$705$0$1,730$0$0$2,435$0$04178788SR 29 from CR 80a (cowboy Way) to CR 731 (whidden Rd)Add 2 to Build 4 Lanes$47$0$120$3,651$6,416$17$0$10,2174178787SR 29 from CR 832 (keri Rd) to F RdAdd 2 to Build 4 Lanes$27$0$0$0$1,641$113$0$1,5554175405SR 29 from CR 846 E to N of New Market Road NAdd 2 to Build 6 Lanes$6,310$0$0$0$0$6,310$0$04178783SR 29 from F Road to Cowboy WayAdd 2 to Build 4 Lanes$7,500$6,947$50$0$0$725$0$13,7714344901SR 29 from I-75 to Oil Well RdProject Dev. & Env.$41$0$0$0$0$41$0$04175406SR 29 from N of New Market Rd N Road to SR 82Add 2 to Build 4 Lanes$4,680$0$0$0$380$5,060$0$04175401SR 29 from Oil Well Road to SR 82Project Dev. & Env.$17$0$0$0$0$17$0$04175404SR 29 from S of Agriculture Way to CR 846 EAdd 2 to Build 4 Lanes$4,175$0$0$0$270$4,445$0$04178782SR 29 from SR 82 to CR 80-aProject Dev. & Env.$10$0$0$0$0$10$0$04178784SR 29 from SR 82 to Hendry C/lAdd 2 to Build 4 Lanes$68$400$703$0$11,491$68$0$12,5944175403SR 29 from Sunniland Nursery Road to S of Agriculture WayAdd 2 to Build 4 Lanes$3,625$0$0$0$500$4,125$0$04419421SR 31 from SR 80 (palm Beach Blvd) to SR 78 (bayshore Rd)Project Dev. & Env.$2,060$0$0$0$0$2,060$0$04345091SR 60 at Bailey RdModify Intersection$15$0$0$0$0$15$0$04338562SR 60 from CR 630 to Grape Hammock RdAdd 2 to Build 6 Lanes$7,150$0$0$0$0$2,175$0$4,9754338563SR 60 from Grape Hammock Road to East of Kissimmee River BridgeAdd 2 to Build 4 Lanes$0$0$350$0$0$0$0$3504145065SR 70 from CR 29 to Lonesome Island RoadProject Dev. & Env.$50$0$0$0$0$50$0$04145062SR 70 from Lorraine Rd to CR 675/waterbury RoadProject Dev. & Env.$2,176$3,551$2,012$0$51,512$57,754$0$1,4974193444SR 710 from E of L-63 Canal to Sherman Wood RanchesAdd 2 to Build 4 Lanes$0$0$0$0$3,400$150$0$3,2504193445SR 710 from Sherman Wood Ranches to CR 714 (martin C/l)Add 2 to Build 4 Lanes$0$0$0$6,350$0$0$0$6,3504193443SR 710 from US 441 to L-63 CanalNew Road$1,613$5,067$2,394$0$0$4,107$0$4,9674258413SR 82 from Alabama Road S to Homestead Road SAdd 2 to Build 4 Lanes$1,777$0$2,050$0$0$1,777$0$2,0504308491SR 82 from Gator Slough Lane to SR 29Add 2 to Build 4 Lanes$35,121$0$0$0$0$26,118$500$8,5034308481SR 82 from Hendry County Line to Gator Slough LaneAdd 2 to Build 4 Lanes$1,236$2,132$0$20$43,893$1,367$0$45,9134258414SR 82 from Homestead Road S to Hendry C/lAdd 2 to Build 4 Lanes$66$0$950$0$0$1,016$0$04258412SR 82 from Shawnee Road to Alabama Road SAdd 4 to Build 6 Lanes$34,863$0$1,320$50$0$147$300$35,7864420271State Funded Sib For Construction of Additional Lanes On SR 31Add 2 to Build 4 Lanes$31,348$0$0$0$0$0$0$31,3484192432US 27 (SR 25) from Highlands County Line to CR 630aAdd 2 to Build 6 Lanes$362$0$3,674$3,784$50$4,085$0$3,7844350631US 27 at East Phoenix StAdd Turn Lane$194$0$0$0$0$194$0$04192434US 27 at SR 60Modify Interchange$3,614$60,335$0$2,000$0$13,432$0$52,5174349861US 27 at SR 64Modify Intersection$94$570$0$0$0$577$0$874424031US 27 from South of Sun 'n Lake to North of Sun 'n LakeAdd Turn Lane$0$0$0$0$175$175$0$04192433US 27 from CR 630a to Presidents DriveAdd 2 to Build 6 Lanes$616$0$2,169$0$0$683$0$2,1014332051US 441 at Ne 102nd StreetAdd Turn Lane$1,005$0$0$0$0$1,005$0$0ANNUAL TOTALS $150,565$79,002$18,742$15,855$119,728$141,473$800$241,615All Values in Thousands of "As Programmed" DollarsPE - Preliminary Engineering;ROW - Right-of-Way;PD&E - Project Development & Environmental;TOTAL LOCAL FUNDS include all funds that start with LF fund code;CON - Construction & Support (may Include Grants);ENV - Environmental Mitigation;1498.B.1Packet Pg. 252Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
""""""""""""""""""£¤27£¤17§¨¦4£¤27£¤27§¨¦75£¤17§¨¦75§¨¦75§¨¦275£¤441De SotoCharlotteLee43450914349861438902141924334192434433856241924324350631433205143656314258414425841242584134344901417540441754054178788417878341787874308481417878241754064178784AB29AB82AB80AB70AB70AB60AB60AB64AB70AB29AB710441942144202714338563442403141450654308491417540141754034193443419344441934454145062PolkCollierHendryGladesHighlandsHardeeManateeOkeechobeeSarasotaFirst Five YearsDISTRICT 1Non-Interstate Plan®LEGENDProjects color coded by highest project phase.Some projects may overlap on map. Project costs are subject to change.NOTESCapacity Improvement ProjectsSTRATEGIC INTERMODAL SYSTEMAdopted Work Program0204010MilesHIGHWAYFY 2018/2019 through FY 2022/2023(as of July 1, 2018)Project PhaseProject Development & EnvironmentPreliminary EngineeringRight-Of-WayConstructionEnvironmental Mitigation1508.B.1Packet Pg. 253Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
FY 2027/202 8
FY 2027/2028 2023/2024
Multi-Modal
Strategic Intermodal System Funding Strategy
Capacity Projects onFY 2023/2024 through the Strategic Intermodal System
State of Florida Department of Transportation
Second Five Year Plan
151
8.B.1
Packet Pg. 254 Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
First Five Year Plan*
The First Five Year Plan illustrates projects on the SIS that
are funded by the Legislature in the Work Program
(Year 1) and projects that are programmed for proposed
funding in the next 2 to 5 years.
Update Cycle: Adopted annually by the
FDOT Secretary, effective July 1st each
year with the start of the new fiscal year.
*SIS Capacity Projects included in the
Adopted Five-Year Work Program
Cost Feasible Plan
The Cost Feasible Plan illustrates projects on the SIS that are considered financially feasible
during the last fifteen years (years 11 to 25) of the SIS Funding Strategy, based on current revenue
forecasts. Projects in this plan could move forward into the Second Five as funds become available or
backwards into the Unfunded Needs Plan if revenues fall short of projections.
Update Cycle: Typically updated every 2 to 3 years as new revenue forecasts become available.
Second Five Year Plan
The FDOT Systems Planning Office produces a document set known as the SIS Funding Strategy, which includes three
inter-related sequential documents that identify potential Strategic Intermodal System (SIS) Capacity Improvement projects in
various stages of development. All of the projects identified within the SIS Funding Strategy are considered financially feasible
for implementation within the next 25 year period. The Florida Legislature established the SIS in 2003 to enhance Florida’s
economic prosperity and competitiveness. The system encompasses transportation facilities of statewide and interregional
significance, and is focused on the efficient movement of passengers and freight. The combined document set, as illustrated
below, illustrates projects that are funded (Year 1), programmed for proposed funding (Years 2 through 5), planned to be
funded (Years 6 through 10), and considered financially feasible based on projected State revenues (Years 11 through 25).
Typically updated
annually, usually in late summer
following the First Five Plan update.
The Second Five Year Plan illustrates projects that are
planned to be funded in the five years (Years 6 through
beyond the Adopted Work ProgramH[FOXGLQJ 7XUQSLNH
3URMHFWVLQWKLVplan could move IRUZDUG LQWRWKH
)LUVW)LYH<HDUPlan as funds become available.
Update Cycle:
152
8.B.1
Packet Pg. 255 Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
MAP IDDESCRIPTIONTOTALDISTRICTMANAGED20242025202620272028FACILITYTOTALLOCALFUNDSTOTALSTATEMANAGEDDistrict 1 SIS Plan ENV PD&E PE ROW CON4301853I-4 AT SR 33 INTERCHANGE MODIFICATIONModify Interchange$0$0$0$0$84,820$200$500$84,1212010325I-75 (SR 93) AT US 301 INTERCHANGEModify Interchange$5,000$0$0$0$0$5,000$0$02012775I-75 (SR93) AT BEE RIDGE ROADModify Interchange$0$0$150,818$0$0$0$0$150,8184206132I-75 AT FRUITVILLE ROAD/CR 780Modify Interchange$115,404$0$0$0$0$176$300$114,9282012773I-75 AT SR 72 (CLARK ROAD) INTERCHANGEModify Interchange$0$2,000$0$0$0$2,000$0$04178785SR 29 FROM COLLIER C/L TO CR 832 (KERI RD)Add 2 to Build 4 Lanes$0$4,155$5,043$0$0$0$0$9,1994178787SR 29 FROM CR 832 (KERI RD) TO F RDAdd 2 to Build 4 Lanes$2,706$0$0$0$0$2,706$0$04175405SR 29 FROM CR 846 E TO N OF NEW MARKET ROAD NAdd 2 to Build 6 Lanes$5,780$0$0$0$0$0$0$5,7804175406SR 29 FROM N OF NEW MARKET RD N ROAD TO SR 82Add 2 to Build 4 Lanes$950$0$30,974$0$0$0$0$31,9244175402SR 29 FROM OIL WELL ROAD TO SUNNILAND NURSERY ROADAdd 2 to Build 4 Lanes$8,275$0$0$0$0$0$0$8,2754178784SR 29 FROM SR 82 TO HENDRY C/LAdd 2 to Build 4 Lanes$475$0$0$0$0$475$0$04193444SR 710 FROM E OF L-63 CANAL TO SHERMAN WOOD RANCHESAdd 2 to Build 4 Lanes$0$7,257$0$0$0$0$0$7,2574193443SR 710 FROM US 441 TO L-63 CANALNew Road$0$0$72,067$0$0$0$525$71,5424308491SR 82 FROM GATOR SLOUGH LANE TO SR 29Add 2 to Build 4 Lanes$0$1,600$0$0$0$1,600$0$04308481SR 82 FROM HENDRY COUNTY LINE TO GATOR SLOUGH LANEAdd 2 to Build 4 Lanes$0$2,800$0$0$0$2,800$0$04192432US 27 (SR 25) FROM HIGHLANDS COUNTY LINE TO CR 630AAdd 2 to Build 6 Lanes$500$0$122,712$0$0$100$1,900$121,2124192433US 27 FROM CR 630A TO PRESIDENTS DRIVEAdd 2 to Build 6 Lanes$70$0$75,811$0$0$70$0$75,811ANNUAL TOTALS$139,160$17,812$457,425$0$84,820$15,127$3,225$680,867All Values in Thousands of "As Programmed" DollarsPE - Preliminary Engineering;ROW - Right-of-Way;PD&E - Project Development & Environmental;TOTAL LOCAL FUNDS include all funds that start with LF fund code;CON - Construction & Support (may Include Grants);ENV - Environmental Mitigation;1538.B.1Packet Pg. 256Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
"""""£¤27£¤17§¨¦4£¤27£¤27§¨¦75§¨¦75§¨¦75§¨¦275£¤441£¤17AB80AB80AB70AB70AB82AB29AB60AB64AB70AB29AB710§¨¦75§¨¦7541924324192433417540643084814308491419344441934432012775430185341754024175405417878441787854178787201277342061322010325PolkCollierLeeHendryGladesHighlandsHardeeManateeDe SotoOkeechobeeSarasotaCharlotte®LEGENDProjects color coded by highest project phase.Some projects may overlap on map. Project costs are subject to change.NOTESCapacity Improvement ProjectsSTRATEGIC INTERMODAL SYSTEMFY 2023/2024 through FY 2027/2028(as of July 1, 2018)Approved Plan0204010MilesDISTRICT 1Second Five YearsHIGHWAYProject PhaseProject Development & EnvironmentPreliminary EngineeringRight-Of-WayConstructionEnvironmental Mitigation1548.B.1Packet Pg. 257Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
Strategic Intermodal System
Long Range Cost Feasible Plan FY 2029•2045
2018 EDITION
PRESENT DAY COSTS 155
8.B.1
Packet Pg. 258 Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year 2020 – 2024 Transportation
Design
PEPDE
Right of Way / ConstructionIDFACILITYFROMTO IMPRV
TYPEROWCONTOTAL
Other Funds
TOTAL
P3 Funds
#YrsBegin YrCOSTTOTAL
DISTRICT 1
2,500 18,0003379US 27 Palm Beach / Hendry County Line SR 80 0 0 FRTCAP30,48016,99920,500
3,000 18,0003380US 27 Glades / Highlands County Line SR 70 0 0 A2-630,2445,44421,000
1,250 1,5003381US 27 South of Skipper Rd.US 98 0 0 A2-65,2979542,750
1,500 2,5003383US 98 / US 441 18th Terrace 38th Ave.0 0 A2-46,2042,5004,000
4,245,139Funded CFP Totals 814,080 Total CFP Funds=5,059,219
State of Florida Department of Transportation
LEGEND NOTES
FY 2035/2036 - 2039/2040
FY 2040/2041 - 2044/2045
(1) All values in thousands of Present Day Dollars (2017).
(2) All phase costs shown as supplied by each District.
(3) CON includes both Construction (CON52) and Construction Support (CEI).
(4) ROW includes both Right-of-Way Acquisition/Mitigation (ROW43/45) and Right-of-Way Support.
(5) "P3 Funds" - Used to fund Public-Private Partnership projects over a specified number of years.
(6) Revenue forecast provides separate values for PDE and PE than for ROW and CON.
(7) Other Funds - assumed to be toll revenue or partner funded.
A1-3: Add 1 Lane to Build 3
A2-4: Add 2 Lanes to Build 4
A2-6: Add 2 Lanes to Build 6
A2-8: Add 2 Lanes to Build 8
A4-12: Add 4 Lanes to Build 12
A1-AUX: Add 1 Auxilliary Lane
A4-SUL: Add 4 Special Use Lanes
ACCESS: Access
BRIDGE: Bridge
FRTCAP: Freight Capacity
GRASEP: Grade Separation
HWYCAP: Highway Capacity
PTERM: Passenger Terminal
ITS: Intelligent Transp. Sys
MGLANE: Managed Lanes
IMPROVEMENT TYPES
FY 2028/2029 - 2034/2035
Mega Projects Phased Over Time
M-INCH: Modify Interchange
N-INCH: New Interchange
NR: New Road
PDE: Project Dev. Env.
SERVE: Add Svc/Front/CD
System
STUDY: Study
UP: Ultimate Plan
2018 Edition
STRATEGIC INTERMODAL SYSTEM • Long Range Cost Feasible Plan • FY 2029•2045DISTRICT 1
Design
PEPDE
Right of Way / ConstructionIDFACILITYFROMTO IMPRV
TYPEROWCONTOTAL
Other Funds
TOTAL
P3 Funds
#YrsBegin YrCOSTTOTAL
0 03331I-4 West of US 27 / SR 25 Polk / Osceola County Line 398,766 0 MGLANE347,08051,6860
0 99,3603330I-4 West of SR 570 / Polk Parkway (West)West of US 27 / SR 25 1,905,680 0 MGLANE1,656,000249,68099,360
0 136,8003333I-75 Collier/Lee County Line SR 78 271,300 0 MGLANE1,710,000271,300136,800
0 6,5003334I-75 at North Jones Loop Rd 0 0 M-INCH39,8097,1666,500
0 7,5003335I-75 at US 17/SR 35 0 0 M-INCH85,73215,4327,500
0 6,5003336I-75 at CR 776/Harbor View 0 0 M-INCH39,8097,1666,500
0 6,5003337I-75 at CR 769/Kings Highway 0 0 M-INCH39,8097,1666,500
0 60,4803339I-75 North of University Parkway CR 6 / Moccasin Wallow Rd.996,584 0 MGLANE821,344175,24060,480
0 34,2003338I-75 South of River Road SR 681 64,538 0 MGLANE570,00064,53834,200
0 49,0143463I-75 SR 681 North of University Parkway 152,341 0 MGLANE491,761152,34149,014
0 63,2453332I-75 East of SR 951 Collier / Lee County Line 145,427 0 MGLANE1,250,398145,42763,245
0 4,3331379SR 29 I-75 Oil Well Rd 0 0 A2-428,8895,2004,333
0 03341SR 29 Oil Well Rd. / CR 658 Sunniland Nursery Rd.4,548 0 A2-426,6274,5480
0 03342SR 29 Sunniland Nursery Rd.South of Agriculture Way 2,378 0 A2-414,2062,3780
0 03343SR 29 S. of Agriculture Way CR 846 E 28,946 0 A2-420,5435,6280
0 03347SR 29 CR 846 E N. of New Market Road N.
Lorem ipsum
0 NR00
0 9,3503348SR 31 SR 80 SR 78 0 0 A2-47,1138,9149,350
0 9563349SR 31 SR 78 CR 78/River Rd 10,567 0 A2-46,3764,191956
0 3,0493350SR 31 CR 78/River Rd Cook Brown Rd 30,934 0 A2-420,32410,6103,049
0 03354SR 60 East of CR 630 Polk / Osceola County Line 7,830 0 A2-435,0417,8300
2,500 19,5003352SR 60 Hillsborough / Polk County Line CR 555 / Agricola Rd.0 0 A2-659,14610,64622,000
3,000 21,0003353SR 60 SR 60A / Van Fleet Dr.SR 25 / US 27 0 0 A2-664,26511,56824,000
1,600 4,5003359SR 64 Hardee / Highlands County Line US 27 0 0 A2-415,5702,8036,100
2,000 10,2503357SR 64 US 17 SR 636 0 0 A2-420,6773,72212,250
1,750 5,0003358SR 64 Old Town Creek Rd. / CR 671 / Parnell Rd.Hardee / Highlands County Line 0 0 A2-410,7971,9436,750
1,200 1,7003367SR 70 NW 38th Terrace US 98 0 0 A2-48,7133,0612,900
0 2,8793363SR 70 Jefferson Avenue US 27 0 0 A2-419,1903,1162,879
0 2,4563364SR 70 US 27 CR 29 0 0 A2-416,3713,0702,456
0 1,0833365SR 70 CR 29 Lonesome Island Road 0 0 A2-47,2171,2991,083
3,500 39,0003362SR 70 East of SR 31 Jefferson Avenue 0 0 A2-4196,86816,33642,500
2,500 18,5003361SR 70 Manatee County Line West of Peace River (American Legion Rd)0 0 A2-492,89314,60321,000
3,000 26,0003360SR 70 CR 675 DeSoto County Line 0 0 A2-4130,87637,80629,000
4,000 35,0003366SR 70 Lonesome Island Road NW 38th Terrace 0 0 A2-467,05012,06939,000
0 03369SR 710 Sherman Woods Ranch Okeechobee / Martin County Line 7,399 0 A2-435,8767,3990
1,500 4,5003370SR 80 SR 31 / Arcadia Rd.Buckingham Rd.0 0 A2-611,4292,0576,000
2,500 4,5003371SR 82 SR 739 / Fowler Ave.Michigan Link Ave.0 0 HWYCAP12,22412,0957,000
0 2,1893373SR 82 Alabama Road Homestead Blvd.0 0 A2-614,5942,6272,189
3,000 9,0003372SR 82 Michigan Link Ave.Gateway Blvd 0 0 HWYCAP26,0994,69812,000
750 6743374US 17 Palmetto St.SR 70 / Hickory St.0 0 HWYCAP1,6342941,424
750 1,9653375US 17 SR 70 / Hickory St.SR 35 / DeSoto Ave.0 0 HWYCAP4,7688582,715
1,045 2,000969US 17 Copley Drive N of CR 74 (Bermont Rd)0 0 A2-68,6031,5413,045
1,250 2,5003376US 17 Mann Rd.Main St.0 0 A2-66,8751,2383,750
1,000 3,0003377US 17 Main St.SR 60A / Auto Zone Ln 0 0 A2-62,3164174,000
3,500 4,1823378US 19 I-275 Ramp Skyway Br. Hillsborough County Line 0 0 A2-612,7872,3027,682
0 16,3203382US 27 North of Kokomo Rd.Polk / Lake County Line 6,664 0 HWYCAP108,7986,66416,320
0 03346SR 29 F Rd North of Cowbay Way 47,899 0 A2-447,89900
49,90549,905
01383SR 29 CR80A CR 731 (Whidden Road)0 0 A2-428,8895,200 113,434 113,434
23,318
Design
PEPDE
Right of Way / ConstructionIDFACILITYFROMTO IMPRV
TYPEROWCONTOTAL
Other Funds
TOTAL
P3 Funds
#YrsBegin YrCOSTTOTAL
2,500 18,0003379US 27 Palm Beach / Hendry County Line SR 80 0 0 FRTCAP30,48016,99920,500
3,000 18,0003380US 27 Glades / Highlands County Line SR 70 0 0 A2-630,2445,44421,000
1,250 1,5003381US 27 South of Skipper Rd.US 98 0 0 A2-65,2979542,750
1,500 2,5003383US 98 / US 441 18th Terrace 38th Ave.0 0 A2-46,2042,5004,000
4,245,139Funded CFP Totals 814,080 Total CFP Funds=5,059,219
Florida Department of Transportation • Systems Implementation Office2018 Edition
156
8.B.1
Packet Pg. 259 Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year 2020 – 2024 Transportation
Strategic Intermodal System
District 1
Long Range
Cost Feasible Plan
FY 2029•2045
LEGEND
Florida Department of Transportation • Systems Implementation Office2018 Edition
157
8.B.1
Packet Pg. 260 Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year 2020 – 2024 Transportation
APPENDIX B COLLIER COUNTY AND LEE COUNTY REGIONAL ROADWAY MAP1588.B.1Packet Pg. 261Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
XY
XY
SWFIA
Sanibel-
C
a
p
t
i
v
a
R
dStr
i
n
g
f
e
l
l
ow
R
d
SR 78Burnt Store RdCape Coral PkwyChiquita BlvdDiplomat Pkwy
SR 78
Santa Barbara BlvdDel Prado BlvdU
S
4
1
B
u
s
.
4
1
Hancock Pkwy SR 80US 41Metro PkwySR 82Ortiz AveI-75Daniels Pkwy
SR 82SR 867Corkscrew Rd
Alico RdSummerlin RdBonita Bch RdUS 41Three Oaks PkwyThree Oaks PkwyVanderbilt DrOld 41I-7
5
Immokalee Rd
Oil Well Rd SR 29Immokalee Rd
US 41Airport - Pulling RdLivingston RdI-75
Davis Blvd Santa Barbara BlvdI-75
US 41San Marco DrSR 29ProposedAlico-Green MeadowsConnector
ProposedThree OaksExt
ProposedLogan BlvdExt
RosaParksIntermodal Center
FGCU
AveMaria Camp Keais RdEverglades BlvdCamp Keais Rd & Everglades BlvdAre Not in the Federal Aid SystemCAT Creekside Transfer Center
CAT OperationsFacilityCATTransfer Center
Golden Gate Pkwy
Pine Ridge RdCollier BlvdSR 951CR 864
Proposed VeteransMemorial Blvd
Hanson Ext
Legend
XY SIS Hubs
Proposed Interstate Interchange
Existing Regional Facility
Programmed Regional Facility
Planned Regional Facility
Major Roads
COLLIER-LEEREGIONAL ROADWAY NETWORK
Created: Brian Raimondo 2.9.2018C:\Regional Networks\(GIS) Regional Network 2011\Reg_HighwaySource: Collier-Lee MPOs
4
0 5 102.5 Miles
AMENDED: COLLIER MPO MAY 12, 2017 -- LEE COUNTY MPO MAY 19, 2017
159
8.B.1
Packet Pg. 262 Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year 2020 – 2024 Transportation
APPENDIX C AIRPORT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMSINCLUDES: EVERGLADES AIRPARK IMMOKALEE REGIONAL AIRPORT MARCO ISLAND AIRPORT NAPLES MUNICIPAL AIRPORT The Naples and Collier County Airport Authorities develop annual aviation project priorities. These project priorities are listed in their Joint Airport Capital Improvement Programs. (JACIP) and capital improvement plans for each of the airports within the Collier MPO planning area. These programs and plans have been coordinated with the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). 1608.B.1Packet Pg. 263Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
AIRPORT SPONSOR REQUESTED FUNDING -
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN SUMMARY Page 1 of 24/3/2019
Local ID:Everglades Airpark
Collier County Airport Authority
12-0021
03182.*A
Airport:
Sponsor:Sponsor ID:
NPIAS No.:
Site No.:
X01
MKY
Sponsor Sponsor YearProject Description:
Sponsor Requested Funding Breakdown
Federal State Local
Fed
Priority
PFL0012389 2019UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$312,500
Design, Permit, Bid and Construct Seaplane Base
$0 $250,000 $62,500
PFL0012390 2019UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$150,000
Design, Permit & Bid Runway 15/33 Reconstruction
$150,000 $0 $0
2019Yearly Total $462,500$150,000 $250,000 $62,500
PFL0003358 441671 1 2 2020UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$2,000,000
Reconstruct and widen Runway 15/33
$2,000,000 $0 $02
PFL0012389 2020UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$787,500
Design, Permit, Bid and Construct Seaplane Base
$0 $630,000 $157,500
PFL0012390 2020UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$17,000
Design, Permit & Bid Runway 15/33 Reconstruction
$0 $8,500 $8,500
2020Yearly Total $2,804,500$2,000,000 $638,500 $166,000
PFL0003358 441671 1 2 2021UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$225,000
Reconstruct and widen Runway 15/33
$0 $112,500 $112,5002
PFL0008819 2021UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$150,000
Install VASI System
$150,000 $0 $04
PFL0010198 4 2021UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$180,000
Airport Master Plan Update
$180,000 $0 $03
2021Yearly Total $555,000$330,000 $112,500 $112,500
PFL0008818 5 2022UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$1,125,000
Land Acquisition
$1,125,000 $0 $05
PFL0008819 2022UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$16,500
Install VASI System
$0 $8,250 $8,2504
161
8.B.1
Packet Pg. 264 Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
PFL0010198 4 2022UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$20,000
Airport Master Plan Update
$0 $10,000 $10,0003
2022Yearly Total $1,161,500$1,125,000 $18,250 $18,250
PFL0008818 5 2023UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$112,500
Land Acquisition
$0 $56,250 $56,2505
PFL0008820 2023UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$150,000
Design, Permit, Bid and Construct Apron
$150,000 $0 $0
2023Yearly Total $262,500$150,000 $56,250 $56,250
PFL0008311 2024UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$750,000
Design, Permit, Construct T-Hangar
$0 $600,000 $150,000
PFL0008820 2024UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$250,000
Design, Permit, Bid and Construct Apron
$0 $192,500 $57,500
2024Yearly Total $1,000,000$0 $792,500 $207,500
162
8.B.1
Packet Pg. 265 Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
AIRPORT SPONSOR REQUESTED FUNDING -
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN SUMMARY Page 1 of 24/3/2019
Local ID:Immokalee Regional Airport
Collier County Airport Authority
12-0031
03245.*A
Airport:
Sponsor:Sponsor ID:
NPIAS No.:
Site No.:
IMM
MKY
Sponsor Sponsor YearProject Description:
Sponsor Requested Funding Breakdown
Federal State Local
Fed
Priority
PFL0009404 433632 1 2019UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$70,000
Security Updates and Additions
$0 $56,000 $14,000
PFL0009406 441783 1 2019UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$150,000
Design, Permit and Bid Extension of Taxiway C
$150,000 $0 $03
PFL0009407 2019UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$1,500,000
Enhanced Gate Access Control/Monitoring and Arifield Perimeter Fencing and Airport Fiber Connection
$1,200,000 $150,000 $150,0004
PFL0011426 443451 1 2019UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$49,876
Purchase 1000 gallon AVGAS (100LL) Refueler
$0 $49,876 $0
PFL0012650 2019UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$300,000
Acquire and Install Emergency Generator
$0 $0 $300,000
2019Yearly Total $2,069,876$1,350,000 $255,876 $464,000
PFL0003510 441783 1 2020UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$2,013,300
Construct Extension of Taxiway C
$2,013,300 $0 $03
PFL0008323 2020UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$1,500,000
Design, Permit, Construct Aircraft Storage Hangars
$0 $1,200,000 $300,000
PFL0009404 433632 1 2020UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$780,000
Security Updates and Additions
$0 $624,000 $156,000
PFL0009406 441783 1 2020UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$17,000
Design, Permit and Bid Extension of Taxiway C
$0 $8,500 $8,5003
PFL0011323 438977 1 2020UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$440,000
Design Rehabilitation of Runway 18/36
$0 $352,000 $88,000
2020Yearly Total $4,750,300$2,013,300 $2,184,500 $552,500
PFL0003510 441783 1 2021UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$223,700
Construct Extension of Taxiway C
$0 $111,850 $111,8503
163
8.B.1
Packet Pg. 266 Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
PFL0009405 438977 1 2021UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$6,600,000
Rehabilitate Runway 18/36
$0 $5,280,000 $1,320,000
PFL0012380 2021UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$237,330
Design, Permit & Bid Perimeter Road & Taxiway A Modifications
$237,330 $0 $0
2021Yearly Total $7,061,030$237,330 $5,391,850 $1,431,850
PFL0008317 2022UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$1,023,200
Design Airpark Boulevard Extension
$0 $818,560 $204,640
PFL0012380 2022UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$26,370
Design, Permit & Bid Perimeter Road & Taxiway A Modifications
$0 $13,185 $13,185
PFL0012381 2022UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$3,559,140
Construct Perimeter Road & Taxiway A Modifications
$3,559,140 $0 $0
2022Yearly Total $4,608,710$3,559,140 $831,745 $217,825
PFL0008318 2023UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$50,000
Design Airport Maintenance and Operations Building
$0 $40,000 $10,000
PFL0008321 2023UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$2,019,600
Construct Airpark Boulevard Extension
$0 $1,615,680 $403,920
PFL0012381 2023UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$395,460
Construct Perimeter Road & Taxiway A Modifications
$0 $197,730 $197,730
2023Yearly Total $2,465,060$0 $1,853,410 $611,650
PFL0008320 2024UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$1,500,000
Construct Airport Maintenance and Operations Building
$0 $1,200,000 $300,000
2024Yearly Total $1,500,000$0 $1,200,000 $300,000
164
8.B.1
Packet Pg. 267 Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
AIRPORT SPONSOR REQUESTED FUNDING -
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN SUMMARY Page 1 of 24/3/2019
Local ID:Marco Island Executive Airport
Collier County Airport Authority
12-0142
03315.44*A
Airport:
Sponsor:Sponsor ID:
NPIAS No.:
Site No.:
MKY
MKY
Sponsor Sponsor YearProject Description:
Sponsor Requested Funding Breakdown
Federal State Local
Fed
Priority
PFL0005820 437063 1 2019UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$3,100,000
Construct New Terminal, Auto Parking, Airport Entrance and Aircraft Apron
$0 $2,480,000 $620,0002
PFL0012315 438976 1 2019UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$925,213
Demolish Terminal & Construct Apron
$0 $614,731 $310,4821
PFL0012649 2019UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$120,000
Acquire and Install Emergency Generator
$0 $96,000 $24,000
2019Yearly Total $4,145,213$0 $3,190,731 $954,482
PFL0005820 437063 1 2020UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$4,059,525
Construct New Terminal, Auto Parking, Airport Entrance and Aircraft Apron
$0 $3,247,620 $811,9052
PFL0010945 2020UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$150,000
Design, permit, and Construct Aircraft Hangars
$0 $120,000 $30,000
PFL0011428 2020UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$100,000
Construct Apron Expansion
$0 $80,000 $20,0005
2020Yearly Total $4,309,525$0 $3,447,620 $861,905
PFL0005820 437063 1 2021UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$2,500,000
Construct New Terminal, Auto Parking, Airport Entrance and Aircraft Apron
$0 $2,000,000 $500,0002
PFL0009401 2021UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$285,000
Preliminary Planning and Design of Air Traffic Control Tower
$285,000 $0 $05
PFL0010945 2021UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$1,700,000
Design, permit, and Construct Aircraft Hangars
$0 $1,360,000 $340,000
PFL0011428 2021UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$1,000,000
Construct Apron Expansion
$0 $800,000 $200,0005
PFL0012373 2021UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$750,000
Construct Aircraft Operations/Maintenance/GSE Facility
$0 $600,000 $150,000
165
8.B.1
Packet Pg. 268 Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
2021Yearly Total $6,235,000$285,000 $4,760,000 $1,190,000
PFL0006538 2022UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$2,398,750
Construct ATCT
$2,398,750 $0 $05
PFL0009401 2022UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$15,000
Preliminary Planning and Design of Air Traffic Control Tower
$0 $7,500 $7,5005
PFL0012374 2022UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$300,000
Expand Fuel Farm Capacity
$0 $240,000 $60,000
2022Yearly Total $2,713,750$2,398,750 $247,500 $67,500
PFL0006538 2023UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$126,250
Construct ATCT
$0 $63,125 $63,1255
2023Yearly Total $126,250$0 $63,125 $63,125
166
8.B.1
Packet Pg. 269 Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
AIRPORT SPONSOR REQUESTED FUNDING -
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN SUMMARY Page 1 of 23/29/2019
Local ID:Naples Municipal Airport
City of Naples Airport Authority
12-0053
03379.*A
Airport:
Sponsor:Sponsor ID:
NPIAS No.:
Site No.:
APF
APF
Sponsor Sponsor YearProject Description:
Sponsor Requested Funding Breakdown
Federal State Local
Fed
Priority
PFL0009408 2020UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$40,000
Off-Airport Obstruction Removal
$0 $0 $40,000
PFL0011418 2020UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$4,000,000
Extend TW B, Apron Construction, Wildlife Habitat Removal - North Quadrant
$3,600,000 $200,000 $200,0002
PFL0011685 1 2020UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$1,800,000
Box and T-Hangar Construction - South Quadrant
$0 $1,440,000 $360,000
PFL0011686 441765 1 2020UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$3,000,000
Runway 5-23 Drainage Swale Improvements
$2,700,000 $150,000 $150,0001
PFL0012398 2 2020UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$500,000
GA Terminal Traffic,Parking and Airport Entrance Road Improvements
$0 $400,000 $100,000
2020Yearly Total $9,340,000$6,300,000 $2,190,000 $850,000
PFL0009408 2021UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$40,000
Off-Airport Obstruction Removal
$0 $0 $40,000
PFL0011685 1 2021UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$5,610,000
Box and T-Hangar Construction - South Quadrant
$0 $4,488,000 $1,122,000
PFL0012398 2 2021UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$2,000,000
GA Terminal Traffic,Parking and Airport Entrance Road Improvements
$0 $1,600,000 $400,000
2021Yearly Total $7,650,000$0 $6,088,000 $1,562,000
PFL0009408 2022UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$40,000
Off-Airport Obstruction Removal
$0 $0 $40,000
PFL0009409 2022UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$500,000
East Quadrant Apron Construction
$0 $400,000 $100,000
PFL0011653 4 2022UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$1,500,000
South GA Apron Rehabilitation
$0 $1,200,000 $300,000
167
8.B.1
Packet Pg. 270 Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
PFL0011715 441675 1 3 2022UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$1,000,000
Airport Security Upgrade
$0 $800,000 $200,000
PFL0012395 5 2022UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$1,500,000
Commercial Terminal Apron Rehabilitation
$0 $1,200,000 $300,000
2022Yearly Total $4,540,000$0 $3,600,000 $940,000
PFL0009408 2023UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$40,000
Off-Airport Obstruction Removal
$0 $0 $40,000
PFL0009409 2023UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$3,800,000
East Quadrant Apron Construction
$0 $3,040,000 $760,000
2023Yearly Total $3,840,000$0 $3,040,000 $800,000
PFL0009408 2024UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$40,000
Off-Airport Obstruction Removal
$0 $0 $40,000
2024Yearly Total $40,000$0 $0 $40,000
168
8.B.1
Packet Pg. 271 Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
APPENDIX D ACRONYMS and FUND and PHASE CODES1698.B.1Packet Pg. 272Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
Acronym DescriptionAcronym2 Description2ADA Americans with Disabilities ActJARC Job Access and Reverse CommuteAUIR Annual Update and Inventory ReportLCB Local Coordinating BoardBCC/BOCC Board of County CommissionersLRTP Long Range Transportation PlanBPAC Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory CommitteeMAP-21 Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st CenturyBPMP Bicycle & Pedestrian Master PlanMPA Metropolitan Planning AreaBRT Bus Rapid TransitMPO Metropolitan Planning OrganizationCAT Collier Area TransitNHS National Highway SystemCEI Construction Engineering InspectionOA Other ArterialCFR Code of Federal RegulationsOPS OperationsCAC Citizens Advisory CommitteePD&E Project Development and EnvironmentalCIGP County Incentive Grant ProgramPEPreliminary EngineeringCMC Congestion Managament CommitteePTO Public Transportation OrganizationCMP Congestion Managament ProcessRACEC Rural Area of Critical Economic ConcernCMS Congestion Management SystemROW Right of WayCOA Comprehensive Operational AnalysisRRU Railroad/UtilitiesCR County RoadSASurface Transportation Program - Any AreaCST Construction SE, TE Surface Transportation Program - EnhancementCTC Community Transportation CoordinatorSHS State Highway SystemCTD Commissioner for the Transportation Disadvantaged SIS Strategic Intermodal SystemCTST Community Traffic Safety TeamSR State RoadDSB Design BuildSRTS, SR2S Safe Routes to SchoolEIS Environmental Impact StudySTIP State Transportation Improvement ProgramEMO Environmental Management OfficeSTP Surface Transportation ProgramENG EngineeringSU, XUSurface Transportation Funds for Urbanized Area formula based - population over 200,000ENV EnvironmentalTAC Technical Advisory CommitteeFAA Federal Aviation AdministrationTAP Transportation Alternative ProgramFDOT Florida Department of TransportationTDTransportation DisadvantagedFHWA Federal Highway AdministrationTDTF Transportation Disadvantaged Trust FundFM Financial ManagementTDP Transit Development PlanFPN Financial Project NumberTDSP Transportation Disadvantaged Service PlanF.S. Florida StatuteTIP Transportation Improvement ProgramFTA Federal Transit AdministrationTMA Transportation Management AreaFY Fiscal YearTRIP Transportation Regional Incentive ProgramHSIP Highway Safety Improvement ProgramTSM Transporation System ManagementHWY HighwayUPWP Unified Planning Work ProgramIInterstateUZA Urbanized AreaINC Incentive ContractorYOE Year of ExpenditureITS Intelligent Transportation SystemJACIP Joint Airport Capital Improvement ProgramAcronyms that are used in this Transportation Improvement Program Additional Acronyms Added: CRA Community Redevelopment Agency, JPA Joint Participation Agreement, TMC Traffic Management Center, TOC Traffic Operations Center1708.B.1Packet Pg. 273Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
Fund CodesPhase CodesACNP Advance Construction NHPPCAPCapitalACSA Advance Construction (SA)CSTConstructionACSS Advance Construction (SS,HSP)DSBDesign BuildACSU Advance Construction SUENVEnvironmentalBNIR Intrastate ROW & Bridge BondsINCContract IncentivesBRRP State Bridge Repair & RehabMNTBridge/Roadway/Contract MaintenanceCIGP County Incentive Grant ProgramOPSOperationsD Unrestricted State Primary PDEProject Development & EnvironmentDI State‐S/W Inter/Intrastate Hwy PEPreliminary EngineeringDDR District Dedicated Revenue PLNPlanningDIH State In‐House Product Support ROWRight‐of‐WayDPTO State ‐ PTO RRURailroad/UtilitiesDS State Primary Highways & jPTODSB2 Everglades Pkwy/Alligator AlleyDU State Primary /Federal ReimbursementFAA Federal Aviation AdminstrationFTA Federal Transit AdministrationFTAT FHWA Transfer to FTA (non‐budget)GFSA GF STPBG Any AreaGMR Growth Management for SISIMD Interstate Maintenance for SISLF Local FundsLFP Local Funds for ParticipatingPL Metropolitan Planning (85% FA, 15% Other)REPE Repurposed Federal EarmarksSA STP, Any AreaSIWR 2015 SB2514A‐Strategic Int SystemSR2T Safe Routes ‐ TransferSU Urban Areas with Population >200KTALT Transportation Alternatives ‐ Any AreaTALU Transportation Alternatives ‐ Area with Population >200KTCSP Trans, Community & System PresTO02 Everglades Parkway1718.B.1Packet Pg. 274Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
APPENDIX E COLLIER MPO’S LONG RANGES TRANSPORTATION PLAN (LRTP) COST FEASIBLE PLAN (HGHWAY AND TRANSIT)To view the entire Collier 2040 LRTP please visit: http://colliermpo.com/index.aspx?page=59 1728.B.1Packet Pg. 275Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
2040 Long Range Transportation Plan – Cost Feasible Plan Part I 2021-2040 PE ROW CST PE ROW CST PE ROW CST Project Totals 43 SR 29North of SR 82Collier/Hendry Line22.42‐Lane Roadway to 4 Lanes with Paved Shoulders (Includes milling and resurfacing of existing pavement)$7.89$10.02$10.0260 SR 29I‐75 (SR 93) Oil Well Rd 2 10.22‐Lane Roadway to 4 Lanes with Paved Shoulders (Includes milling and resurfacing of existing pavement)n/a$6.19 $3.63$9.824I‐75Collier Blvd (CR 951)Interchange, Single Point Urban$41.40$55.87$55.87TMA BOX (20%) Bridgesn/a$4.66$4.66$9.34 $18.66TMA BOX (40%) Pathways (Bike/Ped)n/a$9.32$9.32$18.67 $37.31TMA BOX (40%) CMPn/a$9.32$9.32$18.67 $37.312Golden Gate ParkwayI‐75(New) 2‐Lane Ramp$2.00 $0.59 $2.54$3.133Pine Ridge RdI‐75Intersection Traffic Signalization$5.00 $0.80 $6.35$7.157Immokalee RdI‐75 interchangeIntersection Traffic Signalization$2.75 $0.51 $3.49$4.0012 Old US 41US 41 (SR 45)Lee/Collier County Line21.52‐Lane Roadway to 4 Lanes with Sidewalks, Bike Lanes, and Curb & Gutter (Includes milling and resurfacing of existing pavement)$15.03 $2.72$22.55$25.2718 SR 84 (Davis Blvd)Airport Pulling RdSanta Barbara Blvd434‐Lane Roadway to 6 Lanes with Sidewalks, Bike Lanes , and Curb & Gutter with Inside Paved Shoulder (Includes milling and resurfacing of existing pavement)$33.11$6.85$77.66$84.5119aCritical Needs Intersection (Randall Blvd at Immokalee Road)Immokalee Road8th StreetInterim At‐Grade Intersection improvements, including 4‐laning to 8th Street;$4.00$5.08$5.0821 US 41Goodlette RdN/A Intersection$2.00 $0.37 $2.54$2.9141 SR 951 (Collier Blvd)South of Manatee RdNorth of Tower Rd414‐Lane Roadway to 6 Lanes with Sidewalks, Bike Lanes, and Curb & Gutter (Includes milling and resurfacing of existing pavement)$13.35 $2.02$20.03$22.0515 US 41 (SR 90) (Tamiami Trail East) Greenway Rd 6 L Farm Rd 2 2.62‐Lane Roadway to 4 Lanes with Outside Paved Shoulders (Includes milling and resurfacing of existing pavement)$21.83$6.01$25.59 $41.70 $73.309US 41 (SR 90) (Tamiami Trail East)Collier Blvd (SR 951)Single Point Urban Interchange (SPUI) ‐ Mainline Over Crossroad$44.14$10.30$10.305CR 951 (Collier Blvd)Golden Gate CanalGreen Blvd 4 24‐Lane Roadway to 6 Lanes with Sidewalk, Bike Lanes, and Curb & Gutter (Includes milling and resurfacing of existing pavement)$30.00 $3.66 $38.10$41.7619bCritical Needs Intersection (Randall Blvd at Immokalee Road)Immokalee Road8th StreetUltimate intersection improvement$31.00$4.68 $53.48 $58.1614p Vanderbilt Beach RdCR 951 (Collier Blvd)8th St 0 & 26Expand from 0 & 2 lanes to building 3 lanes of a six lane footprint from Collier Blvd to Wilson Blvd and 2 lanes from Wilson to 8th St$59.96 $12.86 $76.15$89.0140 Airport Pulling RdVanderbilt Beach RdImmokalee Rd 4 24‐Lane Roadway to 6 Lanes with Sidewalks, Bike Lanes, and Curb & Gutter (Includes milling and resurfacing of existing pavement)$5.00$1.22 $6.35$7.5725 Oil Well Rd/CR 858Everglades BlvdOil Well Grade Rd23.92‐Lane Roadway to 4 Lanes with Outside Paved Shoulders (Includes milling and resurfacing of existing pavement)$20.00$30.00$30.00CST PDC2021-20252026-20302031-2040Table 5 - 2040 Cost Feasible Plan - Summary of Funded Projects Grouped by Funding Source with Costs Shown in Future Year of Expenditure (YOE) in Millions of DollarsCF#FacilityFromTo# ofExistingLProjectLengthProject Type1738.B.1Packet Pg. 276Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
2040 Long Range Transportation Plan – Cost Feasible Plan Part II 2021-2040 PE ROW CST PE ROW CST PE ROW CST Project Totals 33 Veterans Memorial Blvd Livingston Road US 41 2 2.9 2‐Lane Undivided Roadway with Sidewalks, Bike Lanes and Curb & Gutter $8.00 $1.95 $1.08$12.00$15.0320 Immokalee RdCamp Keais Rd Carver St 2 2.52‐Lane Roadway to 4 Lanes with Sidewalks, Bike Lanes, and Curb & Gutter (Includes milling and resurfacing of existing pavement)$25.04$5.24 $23.01 $37.56$65.8156 Benfield RoadCity Gate Boulevard Lords Way 0 3.9 2 lane roadway in a 4 lane footprint$56.47 $1.83$20.69$21.21$43.7229 Wilson Boulevard/Black Burn RoadWilson BoulevardEnd of Haul Road02.62 lane roadway in a 4 lane footprint$29.31 $0.61$6.90$30.70$38.2051 Wilson Blvd. Golden Gate Blvd.Immokalee Rd.23.32‐Lane Roadway to 4 Lanes$23.36 $2.85$21.47$44.63 $68.9473 Little League Rd. Ext.SR‐82 Westclox St. 0 3.7 New 2‐lane roadway$28.02$3.86$17.05 $53.52 $74.42Future County Highway FundsProjects to be determined at a later date$9.12 $3.37$10.47 $26.35$64.17 $17.42 $121.7814p Vanderbilt Beach Road ExtCollier Boulevard8th Street 2 & 06Add remaining 3 lanes$39.97$76.34 $76.3434 Camp Keais RoadImmokalee RoadPope John Paul Blvd.22.62‐Lane Roadway to 4 Lanes with Outside Paved Shoulder (Includes milling and resurfacing of existing pavement)$10.00$2.76$19.10 $21.8636 Vanderbilt Beach RoadAirport Road US 414 2.14‐Lane Roadway to 6 Lanes with Sidewalks, Bike Lanes, and Curb & Gutter (Includes milling and resurfacing of existing pavement)$4.00$3.10$6.00$9.1032 Immokalee Rd (CR 846)SR 29 Airpark Blvd 2 0.42‐Lane Roadway to 4 Lanes with Sidewalks, Bike Lanes, and Curb & Gutter (Includes milling and resurfacing of existing pavement)$4.06$3.10$4.69 $7.75 $15.55$636.31 $22.50 $13.93 $229.78 $68.97 $70.83 $151.43 $21.17 $244.70 $360.62 $1,183.93Notes:Revenue Spent RemaininRevenue Spent RemainingRevenue Spent Remainin2021‐2025 2026‐2030Design phases funded by OA not included in totalsTMA$23.32$23.29 $0.03$23.32$23.29 $0.03$46.64$46.69‐$0.05$0.01PE/PD&E 1.219 1.379#56 and #29 are only partial ROW & Mitigation costsOA$55.60$58.10‐$2.50$52.60$42.58 $10.02$115.10$144.95‐$29.85‐$22.33ROW1.44 1.838SIS$65.89$65.89 $0.00$0.00$0.00 $0.00$9.82$9.82 $0.00$0.00CST1.271.5County$106.82$108.26‐$1.44$201.66$212.50‐$10.84$430.84$414.74 $16.10$3.832031-2040# ofExistingLProjectLengthProject TypeCST PDC2021-20252026-20301.5612.3451.91Table 5 - 2040 Cost Feasible Plan - Summary of Funded Projects Grouped by Funding Source with Costs Shown in Future Year of Expenditure (YOE) in Millions of DollarsCF#FacilityFromTo2021‐2025 2026‐2030 2031‐2040Remaining BalanceProject PhaseInflation Factors2031‐20401748.B.1Packet Pg. 277Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
LRTP Transit Cost Feasible Plan – Service Schedule
175
8.B.1
Packet Pg. 278 Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year 2020 – 2024 Transportation
LRTP Transit Cost Feasible Plan – Operating and Capital Costs Summary
176
8.B.1
Packet Pg. 279 Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year 2020 – 2024 Transportation
APPENDIX F FEDERAL LANDS APPROPRIATIONS (Eastern Federal Lands Highway Division of the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)) 1778.B.1Packet Pg. 280Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
Federal Lands Highway Program (see 23 US Code §204)
Recognizing the need for all public Federal roads to be treated with a uniform set of policies similar to the policies that
apply to Federal-aid highways; the Federal Lands Highway Program (23 US Code §204) was established with rules that
apply to all public land highways, park roads and parkways, refuge roads, and Native American reservation roads and
bridges. In general, funds made available for these roads shall be used by the Secretary of Transportation and the
Secretary of the appropriate Federal land management agency. Funds may be used for: transportation planning,
research, engineering and construction of highways, roads and parkways; and transit facilities located on public lands,
national parks and Native American reservations. Funds may also be used for operation and maintenance of transit
facilities located on public lands, national parks and Native American reservations.
Eligible projects for each type of Federal land highway include: transportation planning for tourism, recreational travel and
recreational development; adjacent parking areas; interpretive signage; acquisition of scenic easements and scenic or
historical sites; provisions for bicycles and pedestrians; roadside rest areas including sanitary and water facilities; and
other appropriate facilities such as visitor centers. Lastly, a project to build a replacement of the federally owned bridge
over the Hoover Dam is eligible for funding.
In general, funds available for refuge roads may only be used for maintenance and improvement of refuge roads and
associated facilities, and for the administrative costs of these improvements.
Forest Development Roads and Trails (see 23 US Code §205)
Funds available for forest development roads and trails shall be used by the Secretary of Agriculture for construction
and maintenance of eligible roads and trails. In addition, funds shall be available for adjacent parking areas and for
sanitary, water and fire control facilities.
Defense Access Roads (see 23 US Code §210)
The Secretary of Transportation is authorized to use funds appropriated for defense access roads for construction,
maintenance and repair of defense access roads (including bridges and tunnels) to military reservations, defense
industries, defense industry sites, and to the sources of raw materials when such roads are deemed important to
the national defense by the Secretary of Defense or such other official as the President may designate.
178
8.B.1
Packet Pg. 281 Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
Bicycle Transportation and Pedestrian Walkways (see 23 US Code §217)
Subject to the approval of the Secretary of Transportation a State may obligate Surface Transportation Program (STP)
and Congestion Mitigation Program funds for construction of pedestrian walkways, bicycle transportation facilities, and
for carrying out non-construction projects related to safe bicycle use. In addition, and subject to approval of the Secretary
of Transportation, a State may obligate funds for construction of pedestrian walkways and bicycle transportation facilities
that are on land adjacent of any highway on the National Highway System (NHS).
At the discretion of the department charged with the administration of Federal Lands Highway Funds, funds authorized
for forest highways, forest development roads and trails, public lands development roads and trails, park roads,
parkways, Native American reservation roads and public lands highways may be used for the construction of pedestrian
walkways and bicycle transportation facilities. Any eligible pedestrian walkway or bicycle transportation facility in this
section shall be deemed a highway project and subject to Federal cost-sharing.
In general, bicycle transportation facilities and pedestrian walkways shall be considered, where appropriate, in
conjunction with all new construction and reconstruction of transportation facilities except for bicycle and pedestrian uses
are prohibited. Transportation plans shall also provide due consideration for safety and contiguous routes for bicyclists
and pedestrians. No bicycle project may be carried out unless it has been determined that such project is primarily for
transportation purposes as opposed to recreational purposes
179
8.B.1
Packet Pg. 282 Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
APPENDIX G SUMMARY OF PUBLIC COMMENTS The MPO's public comment period for the TIP began on April 29, 2019 and will close on June 14, 2019 when the MPO Board will take action to adopt the TIP. The draft TIP has been made available since April 26th on the MPO website (colliermpo.com), at the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) and Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC), through the MPO list-serve for interested individuals/groups, at the MPO office and upon request. FDOT and the MPO did collaborate at an FDOT Open House during FDOT's e-Hearing Week for the Draft Tentative Work Program. The open house was held at the Orange Blossom Public Library on December 5, 2018. Comments received as well as FDOT/MPO responses are included in this appendix. 1808.B.1Packet Pg. 283Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
Public Comments from Joint FDOT/MPO outreach at the Collier Library on 2385 Orange
Blossom during FDOT’s e‐public hearing for Tentative Work Program on 12/05/2018.
(The PTNE Department provided additional information on comments on #4 and #5
subsequent to the meeting.)
1.Comment ‐ Need to add intersection improvements to Randall and Immokalee intersection.
Traffic is terrible on Immokalee Road especially since the Publix and CVS opened. Joan
Beckner.
2.Comment ‐ Serious issues related to the traffic on Immokalee Road. The problem worsens
significantly with season and school in session. The problem seems to be made more difficult
due to the amount of residential housing being built along Immokalee Road east of the Collier
Blvd. intersection. For those of us who live near that choke point, we are now actually
heading east on Immokalee Road and then turning onto Collier Blvd and taking Collier to
Vanderbilt Beach Road. That is now starting to get very busy also.
3.Comment ‐ During rush hour and seasonal times, traffic will back up to Logan Blvd and
further from the I‐75 on and off ramps. I've studied this problem a little; with seven
traffic lights involved and, using queuing theory, I can't sync the timing to
lessen the problem. Furthermore, vehicles are blocking intersections basically causing all
traffic to be further delayed. There almost becomes a "He/She blocked me in, now I'll do the
same to them!". One solution is flyovers but, I don't really see that happening in our
lifetime. Another possibility is to open up Collier Blvd to Bonita Beach Road. Lee County
might not be happy about that. In any case, good luck with this and if you want to contact
me, I can be reached at 239‐963‐9361 or cell is 240‐423‐0906. Tom Ruple
Responses to the first three comments were very similar stating that FDOT is in the
process of completing a PD&E Study for Collier County to identify alternatives for
improving this intersection. One of the potential improvements is a permanent triple left
turn replacing the existing triple left which is being used as a test. There is a potential long‐
term project of adding a fly‐over for people making a left onto Immokalee from Randall.
FDOT is planning to hold a public hearing to update the public on alternatives and findings of
the PD&E early next summer. It was also noted that additional information was available on
County’s recently approved “OneCentSalesTax“ https://collieronecenttax.com/ and the
transportation projects section of the County’s website under Transportation Engineering.
4.Comment ‐ The CAT Bus System is terrific but unfortunately ridership hasn’t grown with the
service it provides. It should be Wi‐Fi accessible so working people may go online and check
for doctor appointment updates, class schedule updates, etc. John Meade
Response ‐ Nationally, transit ridership is trending down. CAT's ridership has stabilized in
the last few years. CAT is in the process of making the CAT system Wi‐Fi accessible; other
potential steps to improve ridership are being taken within budgetary constraints.
(Subsequent to the meeting PTNE added that the CAT system is in the process of becoming
Wi‐Fi accessible.)181
8.B.1
Packet Pg. 284 Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year 2020 – 2024 Transportation
5.Comment ‐ CAT in very inconvenient and unreliable for working people. Many bus stops
have no shelter.
Response ‐ CAT has identified several routes that should be enhanced to increase the
frequency of routes during peak hours to make the service more reliable to working people;
budgetary constraints limit their options in doing this. CAT will be making improvements to
several bus stops, including adding bus shelters to stops. The stops with the highest ridership
will receive the improvements first. All stops may not have shelters. (Subsequent to the
meeting PTNE added additional information to the FDOT/MPO response.)
6.Comment ‐ Jennifer from Indigo Lakes feels Collier roads are easy to navigate given the grid
system. She really likes the pre‐intersection road signs describing upcoming
road intersections. She is from CA and thinks the traffic is not bad here at all. She also
likes the large corridors and sidewalks where she and her family bike ride.
Response ‐ Thanked Jennifer for her comments particularly about the effectiveness of
roadway signage.
7.Comment ‐ Philip from River Reach community says its very clean here, likes the wide
corridors and his only wish is the ability to do more left turns instead of U‐turns where he has
to travel further down the road.
Response ‐ It was briefly explained there may be more of these U‐turns p lanned in the future as the
left turns are often seen as a greater potential for an accident. He agreed and was amiable
to this.
8.Comment ‐ Why did the Everglades sidewalk project (4370961) get pushed out a year and
now has no construction funding programmed? Sidewalks are desperately needed; one
children’s program was stopped as there were no sidewalks to walk on.
Response ‐ Noted that projects sometimes get moved forward or backward and that
construction funding is included for the project for FY22.
9.Comment ‐ Kathryn lives in the Vineyards community and loves the sidewalks on Vanderbilt.
Where she regularly walks and bikes. She doesn’t not want to see any more development in
the area.
Response ‐ Noted that Collier County is one the fastest growing places in Florida.
10.Comment ‐ The distance between gas stations is too long on I‐75 between Immokalee (Exit
111) and Miami. She said that it’s about 35 miles and if she misses it she almost runs out of
gas.
Response ‐ Thanked her for her comment.
11.Comment ‐ Joseph commented that he walks a lot throughout Collier and said he finds
it difficult to get to a job or school in Collier without a car.
Response ‐ Empathized with comment noting that Collier is a very large county. Asked Joseph
if he knew about or had tried the CAT.
182
8.B.1
Packet Pg. 285 Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year 2020 – 2024 Transportation
183
8.B.1
Packet Pg. 286 Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year 2020 – 2024 Transportation
184
8.B.1
Packet Pg. 287 Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year 2020 – 2024 Transportation
APPENDIX H FISCAL CONSTRAINT1858.B.1Packet Pg. 288Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
Federal, State and Local Funding Estimates
FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 Total
Federal $13,606,986 $14,000,787 $11,670,266 $21,121,055 $9,611,911 $70,011,005
State $68,399,204 $27,741,219 $105,980,804 $77,969,096 $116,133,384 $396,223,707
Local $4,601,570 $5,408,723 $2,402,916 $7,510,726 $7,555,044 $27,478,979
$86,607,760 $47,150,729 $120,053,986 $106,600,877 $133,300,339 $493,713,691
Project Funding Source Estimates
FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 Total
Highways $48,301,412 $4,288,822 $95,150 $69,392,948 $113,155,802 $235,234,134
Bridges $280,000 $2,414,382 $5,139,334 $200,000 $920,920 $8,954,636
Bike/Ped 6,321,089 4,071,073 1,510,372 5,649,870 0 $17,552,404
Cong Mgm 1,120,545 1,255,342 2,062,570 1,713,125 3,831,855 $9,983,437
Planning $546,564 $546,564 $546,564 $546,564 $0 $2,186,256
Maintenance $12,085,974 $18,426,777 $103,127,540 $22,082,858 $6,786,450 $162,509,599
Transit $7,472,651 $7,265,269 $6,872,456 $7,015,512 $7,605,312 $36,231,200
Aviation $10,479,525 $8,882,500 $700,000 $0 $1,000,000 $21,062,025
$86,607,760 $47,150,729 $120,053,986 $106,600,877 $133,300,339 $493,713,691
Project Cost Estimates
FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 Total
Highways $48,301,412 $4,288,822 $95,150 $69,392,948 $113,155,802 $235,234,134
Bridges $280,000 $2,414,382 $5,139,334 $200,000 $920,920 $8,954,636
Pathways $6,321,089 $4,071,073 $1,510,372 $5,649,870 $0 $17,552,404
CMS/ITS $1,120,545 $1,255,342 $2,062,570 $1,713,125 $3,831,855 $9,983,437
Planning $546,564 $546,564 $546,564 $546,564 $0 $2,186,256
Maintenance $12,085,974 $18,426,777 $103,127,540 $22,082,858 $6,786,450 $162,509,599
Transit $7,472,651 $7,265,269 $6,872,456 $7,015,512 $7,605,312 $36,231,200
Aviation $10,479,525 $8,882,500 $700,000 $0 $1,000,000 $21,062,025
$86,607,760 $47,150,729 $120,053,986 $106,600,877 $133,300,339 $493,713,691
FY 2019/20 ‐ FY 2023/24 TIP Funding Estimates and Project Cost Estimates
The FY 2020 ‐ FY 2024 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) is fiscally
constrained as shown below.
Please note that the fiscal constraint demonstrated above is from the
FDOT Central Office Report run on March 6, 2019.
186
8.B.1
Packet Pg. 289 Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year 2020 – 2024 Transportation
APPENDIX I CRITERIA USED FOR PROJECT PRIORITIZATION 1878.B.1Packet Pg. 290Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
MPO Board Allocation of its Transportation Management Area (TMA) Funds
The MPO Board adopted a temporary suspension of its former allocation formula for TMA funds
on March 10, 2017. The new, temporary policy allocates 100% of its TMA Funds annually for
five-years as follows: Year 1 – Pedestrian and Bicycle, Year 2 – Bridges, Year 3, Congestion
Management, Year 4 – Pedestrian and Bicycle, and Year 5 – Congestion Management. The Cost
Feasible Plan of the Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) contains a budget line item for these
project categories but does not list individual projects (except for bridge projects) within these
categories.
FDOT requires that the TIP includes the MPO’s criteria and process for prioritizing projects. The
questions/criteria used by the MPO to prioritize projects are listed in the tables below.
Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects
On March 8, 2019, the MPO Board adopted the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan which contains
the criteria and point system that will be used to evaluate bicycle and pedestrian projects. Project
evaluation occurs in a two-step process. First, MPO staff conducts a preliminary assessment for
eligibility according to the following criteria: a) timeliness, b) constructability and c) funding
availability. Next, MPO staff and advisory committees evaluate, score and rank the projects
according to the criteria, points, and associated Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) goal(s)
listed below.
Safety
LRTP Goal: Improve the safety of the transportation system for users
Implements a recommended action in a Bicycle/Pedestrian Road Safety Audit – 5 points
Addresses a safety concern involving serious injuries and fatalities as identified in this Plan,
absent a Safety Audit to verify the proposed mitigation measure – 3 points
Addresses a safety concern involving crashes of less severity, absent a Safety Audit to verify the
proposed mitigation measure – 2 points
Addresses a safety concern expressed by members of the public in the absence of crash records –
1 point
Equity
LRTP Goal: Promote the integrated planning of transportation and land use
Fills a need associated with an Environmental Justice community or use identified in this Plan – 5
points
Fills a need associated with an area that meets some, but not all EJ criteria used in identifying EJ
communities for this Plan – 3 points
Fills a need associated with an area that does not have adequate access to nonmotorized
transportation facilities based upon public input received in the development of this Plan – 1
point
188
8.B.1
Packet Pg. 291 Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year 2020 – 2024 Transportation
Connectivity
LRTP Goal: Improve System Continuity and Connectivity
LRTP Goal: Promote multi-modal solutions
Fills a prioritized infrastructure gap identified in this Plan – 5 points
Fills a need for improved connectivity based upon public input received in the development of
this Plan – 2 points
Congestion Management Projects
Congestion management projects were evaluated based on the Congestion Management Process
(CMP) 2017 Update. Project eligibility was first determined based on the 11 criteria below, which
reflect the Performance Measures adopted as part of the CMP 2017 Update. Each of the criteria
addresses one or more goals of the LRTP which are also listed below. The Congestion
Management Committee (CMC) then prioritized the eligible projects using a Delphi method.
Eligibility Criteria LRTP Goal
Maintains concurrency w/FDOT Regional ITS
and/or Technical advances
reduce roadway congestion
Increases number of connected signalized
intersections
reduce roadway congestion
increase the safety of the transportation
system
Improves Travel Time Reliability reduce roadway congestion
Capacity Enhancement improve system continuity and
connectivity
Increases ridership on existing route and
increases number of riders at specific transit
stops before/after installation
promote multi-modal solutions
Improves bike/ped connections to bus shelters,
inclusive of meeting ADA requirements
promote multi-modal solutions
improve system continuity and
connectivity
Reduces the miles of gaps in cycling network
per 2016 Inventory
promote multi-modal solutions
improve system continuity and
connectivity
increase the safety of the transportation
system
Addresses a problem area identified in B/P
safety study, Walkability Study or B/P Safety
Audit
increase the safety of the transportation
system
189
8.B.1
Packet Pg. 292 Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year 2020 – 2024 Transportation
Study that is Travel Demand Management (TDM) related
Study that is related to New Network Connections
Study that is related to an Intermodal Hub(s)
Bridge Project Application Criteria
Bridge projects were drawn from the County’s East of CR 951 Bridge Report. The LRTP and
therefore Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) recommendations for bridge projects come
directly from this report. The criteria used to evaluate bridge projects and the associated LRTP
goal are listed in the table below.
Question/Criteria LRTP Goal
Emergency response times and proximity to responding
agency.
Increase the safety of the
transportation system for users.
Impact of bridge on increasing mobility and ease of
evacuation.
Improve system continuity and
connectivity.
Gains in service efficiency, particularly for schools. Improve system continuity and
connectivity.
Public sentiment.
Transit Project Selection
Collier Area Transit (CAT) provides the MPO with transit priorities. These priorities are based
on the Transit Development Plan which is the strategic guide for public transportation in Collier
County. The plan is updated annually, and a major update is completed every five years. The
development of proposed transit projects is based on:
1.Situational Appraisal which is an assessment of CAT’s operating environment to identify
community needs.
2.Transit Demand Assessment which is a technical analysis of transit demand and needs used
to identify areas with characteristics supportive of transit.
3.Discussion with public agency staffs, visioning surveys, workshops, and stakeholder
discussions.
4. Coordination with the MPO in the long-range transportation planning process
Long Range Transportation Plan Goals associated with the selection of transit projects
include:
1.Reduce roadway congestion.
2.Promote multi-modal solutions.
190
8.B.1
Packet Pg. 293 Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year 2020 – 2024 Transportation
3.Promote the integrated planning of transportation and land use.
The LRTP and the TIP
The LRTP is also the source of other projects contained in the TIP. Proposed projects in an LRTP’s
Cost Feasible Plan are evaluated, in part, on their merits to improve traffic flow, capacity and
congestion as analyzed using the Travel Demand Model (D1RPM). The LRTP used several
additional criteria in project evaluation including:
1.Freight system improvement
2. Wetland and species impacts
3.Evacuation route
4.Cost per lane mile
5.Reduction in congestion
Projects identified in an LRTP needs analysis are selected for inclusion in the Cost Feasible Plan
based on their needs analysis ranking and on a financial analysis of funds that can reasonably be
expected to be available for transportation investments during the timeframe of the plan. Each
year, the MPO will select a subset of the projects in the Cost Feasible Plan for inclusion in the
upcoming TIP.
191
8.B.1
Packet Pg. 294 Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year 2020 – 2024 Transportation
APPENDIX J TRANSPORTATION PERFORMANCE MEASURES CONSENSUS PLANNING DOCUMENT 1928.B.1Packet Pg. 295Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
Transportation Performance Measures
Consensus Planning Document
Purpose and Authority
This document has been cooperatively developed by the Florida Department of Transportation
(FDOT) and Florida’s 27 Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) through the Florida
Metropolitan Planning Organization Advisory Council (MPOAC), and, by representation on the
MPO boards and committees, the providers of public transportation in the MPO planning areas.
The purpose of the document is to outline the minimum roles of FDOT, the MPOs, and the
providers of public transportation in the MPO planning areas to ensure consistency to the
maximum extent practicable in satisfying the transportation performance management
requirements promulgated by the United States Department of Transportation in Title 23 Part s
450, 490, 625, and 673 of the Code of Federal Regulations (23 CFR). Specifically:
23 CFR 450.314(h)(1) requires that “The MPO(s), State(s), and providers of public
transportation shall jointly agree upon and develop specific written procedures for
cooperatively developing and sharing information related to transportation performance data,
the selection of performance targets, the reporting of performance targets, the reporting of
performance to be used in tracking progress toward achievement of critical outcomes for the
region of the MPO, and the collection of data for the State asset management plan for the
National Highway System (NHS).”
23 CFR 450.314(h)(2) allows for these provisions to be “Documented in some other means
outside the metropolitan planning agreements as determined cooperatively by the MPO(s),
State(s), and providers of public transportation.”
Section 339.175(11), Florida Statutes creates the MPOAC to “Assist MPOs in carrying out the
urbanized area transportation planning process by serving as the principal forum for collective
policy discussion pursuant to law” and to “Serve as a clearinghouse for review and comment by
MPOs on the Florida Transportation Plan and on other issues required to comply with federal or
state law in carrying out the urbanized transportation planning processes.” The MPOAC
Governing Board membership includes one representative of each MPO in Florida.
This document was developed, adopted, and subsequently updated by joint agreement of the
FDOT Secretary and the MPOAC Governing Board. Each MPO will adopt this document by
incorporation in its annual Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) or by separate board
action as documented in a resolution or meeting minutes, which will serve as documentation of
agreement by the MPO and the provider(s) of public transportation in the MPO planning area to
carry out their roles and responsibilities as described in this general document.
193
8.B.1
Packet Pg. 296 Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year 2020 – 2024 Transportation
Roles and Responsibilities
This document describes the general processes through which FDOT, the MPOs, and the
providers of public transportation in MPO planning areas will cooperatively develop and share
information related to transportation performance management.
Email communications will be considered written notice for all portions of this document.
Communication with FDOT related to transportation performance management generally will
occur through the Administrator for Metropolitan Planning in the Office of Policy Planning.
Communications with the MPOAC related to transportation performance management generally
will occur through the Executive Director of the MPOAC.
1.Transportation performance data :
a)FDOT will collect and maintain data, perform calculations of performance metrics and
measures, and provide to each MPO the results of the calculations used to develop
statewide targets for all applicable federally required performance measures. FDOT also
will provide to each MPO the results of calculations for each applicable performance
measure for the MPO planning area, and the county or counties included in the MPO
planning area.12 FDOT and the MPOAC agree to use the National Performance
Management Research Data Set as the source of travel time data and the defined
reporting segments of the Interstate System and non-Interstate National Highway System
for the purposes of calculating the travel time-based measures specified in 23 CFR
490.507, 490.607, and 490.707, as applicable.
b)Each MPO will share with FDOT any locally generated data that pertains to the federally
required performance measures , if applicable, such as any supplemental data the MPO
uses to develop its own targets for any measure.
c)Each provider of public transportation is responsible for collecting performance data in
the MPO planning area for the transit asset management measures as specified in 49 CFR
625.43 and the public transportation safety measures as specified in the National Public
Transportation Safety Plan. The providers of public transportation will provide to FDOT
and the appropriate MPO(s) the transit performance data used to support these measures.
2.Selection of performance targets:
FDOT, the MPOs, and providers of public transportation will select their respective
performance targets in coordination with one another. Selecting targets generally refers to
the processes used to identify, evaluate, and make decisions about potential targets prior to
action to formally establish the targets. Coordination will include as many of the following
opportunities as deemed appropriate for each measure: in-person meetings, webinars,
conferences calls, and email/written communication. Coordination will include timely
1 When an MPO planning area covers portions of more than one state, as in the case of the Florida-Alabama TPO,
FDOT will collect and provide data for the Florida portion of the planning area.
2 If any Florida urbanized area becomes nonattainment for the National Ambient Air Quality Standards, FDOT also
will provide appropriate data at the urbanized area level for the specific urbanized area that is designated.
194
8.B.1
Packet Pg. 297 Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year 2020 – 2024 Transportation
sharing of information on proposed targets and opportunities to provide comment prior to
establishing final comments for each measure.
The primary forum for coordination between FDOT and the MPOs on selecting performance
targets and related policy issues is the regular meetings of the MPOAC. The primary forum
for coordination between MPOs and providers of public transportation on selecting transit
performance targets is the TIP development process.
Once targets are selected, each agency will take action to formally establish the targets in its
area of responsibility.
a)FDOT w ill select and establish a statewide target for each applicable federally required
performance measure.
i.To the maximum extent practicable, FDOT will share proposed statewide targets
at the MPOAC meeting scheduled in the calendar quarter prior to the dates
required for establishing the target under federal rule. FDOT will work through
the MPOAC to provide email communication on the proposed targets to the
MPOs not in attendance at this meeting. The MPOAC as a whole, and individua l
MPOs as appropriate, will provide comments to FDOT on the proposed statewide
targets within sixty (60) days of the MPOAC meeting. FDOT will provide an
update to the MPOAC at its subsequent meeting on the final proposed targets,
how the comments received from the MPOAC and any individual MPOs were
considered, and the anticipated date when FDOT will establish final targets.
ii.FDOT will provide written notice to the MPOAC and individual MPOs within
two (2) business days of when FDOT establishes final targets. This notice will
provide the relevant targets and the date FDOT established the targets, which will
begin the 180-day time-period during which each MPO must establish the
corresponding performance targets for its planning area .
b)Each MPO will select and establish a target for each applicable federally required
performance measure. To the extent practicable, MPOs will propose, seek comment on,
and establish their targets through existing processes such as the annual TIP update. For
each performance measure, an MPO will have the option of either3:
i.Choosing to support the statewide target established by FDOT, and providing
documentation (typically in the form of meeting minutes, a letter, a resolution, or
incorporation in a document such as the TIP) to FDOT that the MPO agrees to
plan and program projects so that they contribute toward the accomplishments of
FDOT’s statewide targets for that performance measure .
ii.Choosing to establish its own target, using a quantifiable methodology for its
MPO planning area. If the MPO chooses to establish its own target, the MPO will
coordinate with FDOT and, as applicable, providers of public transportation
regarding the approach used to develop the target and the proposed target prior to
3 When an MPO planning area covers portions of more than one state, as in the case of the Florida -Alabama TPO,
that MPO will be responsible for coordinating with each state DOT in setting and reporting targets and associated
data.
195
8.B.1
Packet Pg. 298 Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year 2020 – 2024 Transportation
establishment of a final target. The MPO will provide FDOT and, as applicable,
providers of public transportation, documentation (typically in the form of
meeting minutes, a letter, a resolution, or incorporation i n a document such as the
TIP) that includes the final targets and the date when the targets were established .
c)The providers of public transportation in MPO planning areas will select and establish
performance targets annually to meet the federal performance management requirements
for transit asset management and transit safety under 49 U.S.C. 5326(c) and 49 U.S.C.
5329(d).
i.The Tier I providers of public transportation will establish performance targets to
meet the federal performance management requirements for transit asset
management. Each Tier I provider will provide written notice to the appropriate
MPO and FDOT when it establishes targets. This notice will provide the final
targets and the date when the targets were established, which will begin the 180-
day period within which the MPO must establish its transit-related performance
targets. MPOs may choose to update their targets when the Tier I provider(s)
updates theirs, or when the MPO amends its long-range transportation plan by
extending the horizon year in accordance with 23 CFR 450.324(c).
ii.FDOT is the sponsor of a Group Transit Asset Management plan for subrecipients
of Section 5311 and 5310 grant funds. The Tier II providers of public
transportation may choose to participa te in FDOT’s group plan or to establish
their own targets. FDOT will notify MPOs and those participating Tier II
providers following of establishment of transit-related targets. Each Tier II
provider will provide written notice to the appropriate MPO and FDOT when it
establishes targets. This notice will provide the final targets and the date the final
targets were established, which will begin the 180-day period within which the
MPO must establish its transit-related performance targets. MPOs may choose to
update their targets when the Tier II provider(s) updates their s, or when the MPO
amends its long-range transportation plan by extending the horizon year in
accordance with 23 CFR 450.324(c).
iii.FDOT will draft and certify a Public Transportation Agency S afety Plan for any
small public transportation providers (defined as those who are recipients or
subrecipients of federal financial assistance under 49 U.S.C. 5307, have one
hundred (100) or fewer vehicles in peak revenue service, and do not operate a rail
fixed guideway public transportation system). FDOT will coordinate with small
public transportation provider s on selecting statewide public transportation safety
performance targets, with the exception of any small operator that notifies FDOT
that it will draft its own plan.
iv.All other public transportation service providers that receive funding under 49
U.S. Code Chapter 53 (excluding sole recipients of sections 5310 and/or 5311
funds) will provide written notice to the appropriate MPO and FDOT when they
establish public transportation safety performance targets. This notice will
provide the final targets and the date the final targets were established, which will
begin the 180-day period within which the MPO must establish its transit safety
196
8.B.1
Packet Pg. 299 Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year 2020 – 2024 Transportation
performance targets. MPOs may choose to update their targets when the
provider(s) updates theirs, or when the MPO amends its long-range transportation
plan by extending the horizon year in accordance with 23 CFR 450.324(c).
v.If the MPO chooses to support the asset management and safety targets
established by the provider of public transportation, the MPO will provide to
FDOT and the provider of public transportation documentation that the MPO
agrees to plan and program MPO projects so that they contribute towa rd
achievement of the statewide or public transportation provider target s. If the
MPO chooses to establish its own targets, the MPO will develop the target in
coordination with FDOT and the providers of public transportation. The MPO
will provide FDOT and the providers of public transportation documentation
(typically in the form of meeting minutes, a letter, a resolution, or incorporation in
a document such as the TIP) that includes the final targets and the date the final
targets were established. In cases where two or more providers operate in an
MPO planning area and establish different targets for a given measure, the MPO
has the options of coordinating with the providers to establish a single target for
the MPO planning area, or establishing a set of targets for the MPO planning area .
3.Reporting performance targets:
a)Reporting targets generally refers to the process used to report targets, progress
achieved in meeting targets, and the linkage between targets and decision making
processes FDOT will report its final statewide performance targets to the Federal
Highway Administration (FHWA) and the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) as
mandated by the federal requirements .
i.FDOT will include in future updates or amendments of the statewide long-range
transportation plan a description of all applicable performance measures and
targets and a system performance report, including progress achieved in meeting
the performance targets, in accordance with 23 CFR 450.216(f).
ii.FDOT will include in future updates or amendments of the statewide
transportation improvement program a discussion of the anticipated effect of the
program toward achieving the state’s performance targets, linking investment
priorities to those performance targets, in accorda nce with 23 CFR 450.218 (q).
iii.FDOT will report targets and performance data for each applicable highway
performance measure to FHWA, in accordance with the reporting timelines and
requirements established by 23 CFR 490; and for each applicable public transit
measure to FTA, in accordance with the reporting timelines and requirements
established by 49 CFR 625 and 40 CFR 673.
b)Each MPO w ill report its final performance targets as mandated by federal requirements
to FDOT. To the extent practicable, MPOs will report final targets through the TIP
update or other existing documents.
i.Each MPO will include in future updates or amendments of its metropolitan long-
range transportation plan a description of all applicable performance measures
197
8.B.1
Packet Pg. 300 Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year 2020 – 2024 Transportation
and targets and a system performance report, including progress achieved by the
MPO in meeting the performance targets, in accordance with 23 CFR
450.324(f)(3-4).
ii.Each MPO will include in future updates or amendments of its TIP a discussion of
the anticipated effect of the TIP toward achieving the applicable performance
targets, linking investment priorities to those performance targets, in accordance
with 23 CFR 450.326(d).
iii.Each MPO will report target-related status information to FDOT upon request to
support FDOT’s reporting requirements to FHWA.
c)Providers of public transportation in MPO planning areas will report all established
transit asset management targets to the FTA National Transit Database (NTD) consistent
with FTA’s deadlines based upon the provider’s fiscal year and in accordance with 49
CFR Parts 625 and 630, and 49 CFR Part 673.
4.Reporting performance to be used in tracking progress toward attainment of performance
targets for the MPO planning area:
a)FDOT w ill report to FHWA or FTA as designated, and share with each MPO and
provider of public transportation, transportation performance for the state showing the
progress being made towards attainment of each target established by FDOT, in a format
to be mutually agreed upon by FDOT and the MPOAC.
b)If an MPO establishes its own targets, the MPO will report to FDOT on an annual basis
transportation performance for the MPO area showing the progress being made towards
attainment of each target established by the MPO, in a format to be mutually agreed upon
by FDOT and the MPOAC. To the extent practicable, MPOs will report progress through
existing processes including, but not limited to, the annual TIP update.
c)Each provider of public transportation will report transit performance annually to the
MPO(s) covering the provider’s service area, showing the progress made toward
attainment of each target establ ished by the provider.
5.Collection of data for the State asset management plans for the National Highway System
(NHS):
a)FDOT will be responsible for collecting bridge and pavement condition data for the State
asset management plan for the NHS. This includes NHS roads that are not on the State
highway system but instead are under the ownership of local jurisdictions, if such roads
exist.
For more information, contact:
Mark Reichert, Administrator for Metropolitan Planning, Office of Policy Planning, Florida
Department of Transportation, 850-414-4901, mark.reichert@dot.state.fl.us
Carl Mikyska, Executive Director, MPOAC, 850-414-4062, carl.mikyska@mpoac.org
198
8.B.1
Packet Pg. 301 Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year 2020 – 2024 Transportation
APPENDIX K AMENDMENTS and ADMINSTRATIVE MODIFICATIONS All amendments and administrative modifications made to the FY2020 - FY2024 TIP are contained in this appendix.Roll Forward ReportOn July 1 of each year, when the “new” TIP and Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Five-Year Work Program (WP) become adopted, there are often projects that were supposed to get authorized prior to June 30 when the “old” TIP and WP were in effect but did not receive authorization. These projects automatically “roll forward” in the WP but not in the TIP. Since the TIP and WP must match each other, there is a need to amend the TIP to include those projects that did not get authorized prior to June 30. Additionally, Federal Transit Administration (FTA) projects do not automatically roll forward in the WP and TIP therefore a roll forward amendment to the TIP must include these projects as well. Each July, FDOT Work Program Office prepares a Roll Forward Report which lists all projects that require a Roll Forward Amendment to the TIP. The Roll Forward Amendment will not be recognized by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) until October 1st which is the effective date of the “new” TIP. The Roll Forward Amendment is anticipated in the Fall of 2019.1998.B.1Packet Pg. 302Attachment: Final Draft FY2020 – FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program (9248 : Adopt Fiscal Year
06/14/2019
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Adopt by Resolution 2019 Transportation Regional Incentive Program (TRIP) Priorities
OBJECTIVE: For the Board to adopt by resolution the 2019 Transportation Regional Incentive Program
(TRIP) Priorities.
CONSIDERATIONS: Collier and Lee County jointly prioritize regional projects to be eligible for
regional funding. The new TRIP priorities are shown in Attachment 1. The 2019 priorities include new
projects or new phases added to the list, as well as adjustments made in order to move th e project phases
into the year that matches when they are programmed in the local Capital Improvement Element. For the
sake of comparison, the 2018 TRIP priorities are shown in Attachment 2.
Collier County added Construction (CST) for Goodlette Rd between Vanderbilt Beach Rd and Immokalee
Rd; Preliminary Engineering (PE) and CST phases to Collier Blvd between Golden Gate Main Canal and
Golden Gate Parkway; and CST for Vanderbilt Beach Rd from 16th St NE to Everglades Blvd.
Lee County added the Design phase for the Burnt Store Rd from Van Buren Parkway to the Charlotte
County Line project.
The 2019 TRIP priorities are going to both the Lee County MPO and Collier MPO Boards for approval .
FDOT requires a resolution adopting regional priorities, shown in Attachment 3.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: The Citizen’s Advisory Committee voted to endorse the
2019 TRIP priorities at their May 20th meeting. The Technical Advisory Committee did not have a
quorum and therefore could not take formal action to endorse.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the Board adopt by resolution the 2019 Transportation Regional
Incentive Program Priorities.
ATTACHMENT(S)
1. 2019 TRIP Priorities (PDF)
2. 2018 TRIP Priorities (PDF)
3. Joint Resolution 2019-01 (PDF)
9.A
Packet Pg. 303
06/14/2019
COLLIER COUNTY
Metropolitan Planning Organization
Item Number: 9.A
Doc ID: 9252
Item Summary: Adopt by Resolution 2019 Transportation Regional Incentive Program (TRIP)
Priorities
Meeting Date: 06/14/2019
Prepared by:
Title: – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Karen Intriago
06/06/2019 8:40 AM
Submitted by:
Title: Executive Director - MPO – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Anne McLaughlin
06/06/2019 8:40 AM
Approved By:
Review:
Metropolitan Planning Organization Brandy Otero MPO Analyst Review Completed 06/06/2019 8:44 AM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin MPO Executive Director Review Completed 06/06/2019 8:46 AM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin Meeting Pending 06/14/2019 9:00 AM
9.A
Packet Pg. 304
Draft 2019 Joint TRIP Priorities for Lee and Collier
Sponsor Route From To Proposed
Improvement
Requested
Phase Total Cost Requested TRIP
Funds
Staff
Priority
Order
State Funding
Level Fiscal Year
(1)
Utilizing or
relieveing
an SIS
Facility
(2)
SIS
Connectiv
ity
(3)
County
Enterprise
Zones, Rural
Area
(4)
Corridor
Managemen
t
Techniques
(5)
Production
Readiness
(6)
TRIP
Funding
Not
Receive
(7)
Job
Access
and
Economic
(8)
Peformance
on Previous
TRIP Projects
(9)
Overmatc
h
(10)
Public Private-
Partnerships Total
Points
Lee County Ortiz Colonial Blvd SR 82 2L to 4L CST $15,625,000 $6,975,000 1 3 1 2 3 5 0 4 2 1 0 21
Lee County Corkscrew Road E.of Ben Hill Griffin Bella Terra 2L to 4L CST $17,379,925 $6,000,000 2 3 3 0 3 5 0 4 2 1 0 21
Lee County Three Oaks Ext. North of Alico Road - Segment 1 New 4L CST $25,830,000 $7,000,000 3 3 0 0 3 5 0 4 2 1 0 18
Lee County Estero Blvd South Segment Road Upgrade CST $7,750,000 $3,875,000 Funded $ 2,651,966 FY 20/21 0 0 0 3 5 0 4 2 1 0 15
Collier County Vanderbilt Beach Rd US 41 E. of Goodlette 4L to 6L CST $8,428,875 $4,214,438 1 3 0 0 3 5 3 4 2 1 0 21
Collier County Veterans Memorial Blvd.Livingston Road Old US41 New 2 Lane facility CST $10,199,433 5,099,716$ 1 3 0 0 3 5 3 4 2 1 0 21
Collier County Collier Blvd Golden Gate Main
Canal Golden Gate Pkwy 4L to 6L PE $3,200,000 $1,600,000 2 3 3 0 3 1 3 4 2 1 0 20
Lee County Three Oaks Ext. North of Alico Road Segment 2 New 4L CST $25,830,000 $7,000,000 3 3 0 0 3 5 0 4 2 1 0 18
Collier County Collier Blvd Golden Gate Main
Canal Golden Gate Pkwy 4L to 6L ROW $7,000,000 $3,500,000 1 3 3 0 3 3 3 4 2 1 0 22
Collier County Goodlette Road Vanderbilt Beach Road Immokalee Road CST $5,500,000 $2,750,000 2 3 0 0 3 5 3 4 2 1 0 21
Lee County Burnt Store Rd Van Buren Pkwy Charlotte Co/L 2L to 4L PE $8,320,000 $4,100,000 3 3 3 0 3 1 0 4 2 1 0 17
Collier County Oil Well Road Everglades Oil Well Grade Rd. 2L to 6L CST $31,400,000 $15,700,000 1 3 1 3 3 5 3 4 2 1 0 25
Collier County Collier Blvd Golden Gate Main
Canal Golden Gate Pkwy 4L to 6L CST $10,000,000 $5,000,000 2 3 3 0 3 5 3 4 2 1 0 24
Collier County Vanderbilt Beach Rd.16th St. NE Everglades New 2L CST $8,250,000 $4,125,000 3 3 0 3 3 5 3 4 2 1 0 24
2024/2025
2022/2023
2019/2020
2020/2021
2021/2022
2023/2024
9.A.1
Packet Pg. 305 Attachment: 2019 TRIP Priorities (9252 : Adopt by Resolution 2019 Transportation Regional Incentive
2018 Joint TRIP Priorities for Lee and Collier
Adopted by Collier MPO on June 15, 2018 and Lee MPO on June 22, 2018
Sponsor Route From To Proposed
Improvement
Request
ed
Phase
Total Cost Requested
TRIP Funds
Staff
Priority
Order
State
Funding
Level
Fiscal
Year
Total
Points
Collier County Collier Blvd Golden Gate Main
Canal Golden Gate Pkwy 4L to 6L ROW $2,469,440 $1,234,720 #1 23
Cape Coral Chiquita Blvd South of Cape Coral
Pkwy North of SR 78 4L to 6L ROW $30,000,000 $4,000,000 #2 21
LeeTran Facility and New
Service Route CST $3,000,000 $1,500,000 #3 19
Lee County Burnt Store Rd SR 78 Tropicana Pkwy 2L to 4L CST $7,700,000 $3,850,000 #1 $2,962,302 FY 19/20 21
Lee County Estero Blvd Segment 3 Road Upgrade CST $7,750,000 $3,875,000 #2 15
LeeTran Facility CST $1,000,000 $500,000 #3 14
Fort Myers Hanson Street Veronica Shoemaker Ortiz Ave. New 2L CST $12,000,000 $4,000,000 #1 26
Collier County Golden Gate Blvd 20th Street Everglades Blvd 2L to 4L CST $24,300,000 $12,150,000 #2 20
Collier County Vanderbilt Beach Rd US 41 E. of Goodlette 4L to 6L CST $8,428,875 $4,214,438 #3 20
Collier County Intersection CST 5,953,200$ 2,976,600$ #1 24
Collier County Intersection CST $7,304,968 $3,652,484 #2 23
Lee County Three Oaks Ext.North of Alico Road New 4L CST $47,000,000 $7,000,000 #3 20
Lee County Estero Blvd South Segment Road Upgrade CST $7,750,000 $3,875,000 Funded $ 2,651,966 FY 20/21 15
Collier County Oil Well Road Everglades Oil Well Grade Rd. 2L to 6L CST 31,400,000$ 15,700,000$ #1 24
Lee County Corkscrew Road E.of Ben Hill Griffin Bella Terra 2L to 4L CST $12,000,000 $6,000,000 #2 21
Lee County Ortiz Colonial Blvd SR 82 2L to 4L CST $13,950,000 $6,975,000 #3 21
Immokalee at Randal Interim Intersection Improvements
Pine Ridge at Livingston Road Intersection Improvements
2021/2022
2017/2018
Regional Transfer Facility and Connector
2018/2019
LeeTran Capital Expenditures for Passenger Amenities, Bus Pull- Outs,
and pavement markings
2019/2020
2020/2021
9.A.2
Packet Pg. 306 Attachment: 2018 TRIP Priorities (9252 : Adopt by Resolution 2019 Transportation Regional Incentive
Collier County Veterans Memorial
Blvd.Livingston Road Old US41 New 2 Lane
facility CST 10,199,433$ 5,099,716$ #1 20
2022/2023
9.A.2
Packet Pg. 307 Attachment: 2018 TRIP Priorities (9252 : Adopt by Resolution 2019 Transportation Regional Incentive
9.A.3
Packet Pg. 308 Attachment: Joint Resolution 2019-01 (9252 : Adopt by Resolution 2019 Transportation Regional Incentive Program (TRIP) Priorities)
9.A.3
Packet Pg. 309 Attachment: Joint Resolution 2019-01 (9252 : Adopt by Resolution 2019 Transportation Regional Incentive Program (TRIP) Priorities)
06/14/2019
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Approve 2019 Congestion Management, Highway, Bridge and Transit Priorities
OBJECTIVE: To approve the 2019 Congestion Management, Highway, Bridge and Transit Priorities.
CONSIDERATIONS: The MPO Board adopted a policy regarding allocation of its Transportation-
Management Area (TMA) Surface Transportation - Urban (SU) funds over a five-year period. The focus
for FY2024, the new 5th year of the FDOT Work Program which will be programmed this summer, is on
funding congestion management projects. The 2019 Congestion Management Committee (CMC)
Priorities are shown in Attachment 1. Collier County’s Corkscrew Rd Safety Project has been added as
the only change to last year’s Highway Priorities, shown in Attachment 2. No additions or deletions were
made to last year’s Bridge Priorities, as shown in Attachment 3. Collier County’s Public Transportation
and Neighborhood Enhancement (PTNE) Division submitted new Transit Priorities, shown in
Attachment 4.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: On May 20, 2019, the Citizens Advisory Committee voted to
endorse the 2019 priorities shown in Attachments 1-4. The Technical Advisory Committee did not have
a quorum and could not take formal action.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the Board approve the 2019 Congestion Management, Highway,
Bridge and Transit Priorities as shown in Attachments 1-4.
ATTACHMENT(S)
1. 2019 CMC Priorities (PDF)
2. 2019 Highway Project Priorities – Corkscrew Road Addition (PDF)
3. 2019 Bridge Project Priorities – No Change Other Than Status (PDF)
4. 2019 Transit Priorities (PDF)
9.B
Packet Pg. 310
06/14/2019
COLLIER COUNTY
Metropolitan Planning Organization
Item Number: 9.B
Doc ID: 9253
Item Summary: Approve 2019 Congestion Management, Highway, Bridge and Transit Priorities
Meeting Date: 06/14/2019
Prepared by:
Title: – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Karen Intriago
06/06/2019 8:44 AM
Submitted by:
Title: Executive Director - MPO – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Anne McLaughlin
06/06/2019 8:44 AM
Approved By:
Review:
Metropolitan Planning Organization Brandy Otero MPO Analyst Review Completed 06/06/2019 8:57 AM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin MPO Executive Director Review Completed 06/06/2019 9:07 AM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin Meeting Pending 06/14/2019 9:00 AM
9.B
Packet Pg. 311
2019 Congestion Management Project Priorities
PROJECT
RANKING Project Name
Submitting
Agency/
Jurisdiction Estimated Total Funding Request Phase
1
Crayton Road & Harbour
Drive Intersection
Improvements - Roundabout
City of Naples $ 760,480 CEI & CST
2
ITS Fiber Optic and FPL
Power Infrastructure - 13
locations
Collier County $ 272,725 CST
3 Travel Time Data Collection &
Performance Measurements Collier County $ 700,000 CST
4
Mooring Line Drive &
Crayton Road Intersection
Improvements - Roundabout
City of Naples $ 773,349 PE, CEI
and CST
5
Golden Gate Parkway & US-
41 Intersection Improvements
(lane restriping to add left turn
lane sb/eb US41)
City of Naples $ 55,400 PE & CST
6 New- Updated School Flasher
System Collier County $ 217,350 CST
7 New-Vehicle Count Station
Update - 31 locations Collier County $ 311,374 CST
8
Bicycle Detection Systems at 4
intersectioins: US41/Central
Ave, US41/3rd AveS; Park
Shore Drive/Crayton Rd: 8th
St S/3rd Ave S
City of Naples $ 80,000 CST
9
New- Adaptive Traffic Control
system - 15 intersections on
Pine Ridge
Collier County $ 828,000 CST
10 Lidar Mapping Equipment for
Crash Investigations
Lee County
MPO $ 108,993 CAP
Requested
Amount 4,107,671$
Anticipated
Budget 4,134,000$
Balance 26,329$
9.B.1
Packet Pg. 312 Attachment: 2019 CMC Priorities (9253 : Approve 2019 Congestion Management, Highway, Bridge and Transit Priorities)
Collier MPO 2016 Priorities for Highway Projects from 2040 LRTP and MPO Priority Safety ProjectsPhase Source YOE CostPE OA $590,000CST OA $2,540,000PE OA $800,000CST OA $6,350,000PE OA $3,600,000CST OA $38,100,000PE OA $510,000CST OA $3,490,00012Old US 41 US 41 (SR 45)Lee/Collier County lineAdd Lanes and Reconstruct 1.5 $15,030,000 2026‐2030 PE OA $2,720,00019aCritical Needs Intersection (Randall Blvd at Immokalee Rd)Immokalee Rd 8th StreetInterim At‐Grade Improvements, including 4 laning 8th Street$4,000,000 2021‐2025 CST OA $5,080,000PE OA $370,000CST OA $2,542,00041SR 951 (Collier Blvd)South of Manatee RdNorth of Tower Rd 4 to 6 lane roadway 1 $13,350,000 2026‐2030 PE OA $2,020,000LRTP Facility Limit From Limit To Project Description MilesTotal Project Cost (PDC)Time Frame Phase SourceFunding Requestn/aCorkscrew Rd (north section)750 Feet South of Wildcat Drive1200 Feet East of Wildcat DriveIncrease curve radius & widen 10' lanes to 11'0.552 $1,400,000 2020 CST OA, SU $700,000n/aCorkscrew Rd (south section)Lee County CurveCollier County Proposed CurveWiden Lanes from 10' ‐11', Add 2 '‐ shoulders both sides1.005 $1,200,000 2020 CST OA, SU $600,000TOTALS (COLLIER MPO) $2,600,000 $1,300,000Intersection Traffic Signalization $5,000,000 3Pine Ridge Rd I‐75 InterchangeProjects Funded in CFP YOEI‐75 Interchange2Golden Gate ParkwayLRTP Priority RankingI‐75 Interchange I‐75 InterchangeEastbound on‐ramp ‐ New 2 lane Ramp$2,000,000 Final Proposed Improvement ‐ 2040 LRTPLink in Miles Facility Limit From Limit To$7,150,000Total Project Cost (PDC)2021‐2025 $3,130,0002021‐25Construction Time Frame5‐Year Window in which CST is Funded by Sourcen/an/aHIGHWAY SAFETY YOEHIGHWAY PRIORITIES 2019$2,000,000 2021‐2025 $2,912,000$22,050,000Immokalee Rd I‐75 Interchange I‐75 Interchange Intersection Traffic Signalization $2,750,000 2021‐2025 $4,000,000CR 951 (Collier Blvd)Golden Gate CanalGreen Blvd 4 to 6 lane roadway2021‐202521US 41 Goodlette Rd N/A Intersection Improvements $5,080,0002.0 $30,000,000 2021‐2025 $41,700,000759.B.2Packet Pg. 313Attachment: 2019 Highway Project Priorities – Corkscrew Road Addition (9253 : Approve 2019 Congestion
2019 Bridge Priorities - 2018 priorities w/ status updated
Rank Location Proposed Improvement Cost Estimate Status
1 16th Street NE, south of 10th Ave NE New Bridge Construction $8,000,000 CST $4.9 m SU/SA
2 47th Avenue NE, west of Everglades Boulevard New Bridge Construction $8,000,000 PD&E completed
3 Wilson Boulevard, south of 33rd Avenue NE New Bridge Construction $8,000,000
4 18th Ave NE, between Wilson Boulevard N and 8th Street NE New Bridge Construction $8,000,000
5 18th Ave NE, between 8th Street NE and 16th Street NE New Bridge Construction $8,000,000
6 13th Street NW, north end at proposed Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension New Bridge Construction $8,000,000
7 16th Street SE, south end New Bridge Construction $8,000,000
8 Wilson Boulevard South, south end New Bridge Construction $8,000,000
9 Location TBD, between 10th Avenue SE and 20th Avenue SE New Bridge Construction $8,000,000
10 62nd Avenue NE, West of 40th Street NE New Bridge Construction $8,000,000
9.B.3
Packet Pg. 314 Attachment: 2019 Bridge Project Priorities – No Change Other Than Status (9253 : Approve 2019 Congestion Management, Highway,
Priority
Ranking
Requested Funding /
Project Estimates *Location Description
1 $142,847.10 *Route 11 US41 Increase Frequency To Peak Service - Add 2 Loops
2 $285,694.20 *Route 12 Airport Pulling Rd Increase Frequency To Peak Service - Add 1 Loop
3 $222,723.60 *Route 19 Immokalee Increase Frequency To Morning Service - Add 1 Loop
4 $428,541.30 *Route 15 Golden Gate Pkwy Increase Frequency To Peak Service - Add 3 Loops
5 $334,085.40 *Route 25 Golden Gate Pkwy Add 2 Loops (Currently The Route Has A Gap During The Day)
6 $334,085.40 *Route 17 East Naples Extend Evening Service By 2 Loops
7 $167,042.70 *Route 11 US41 Extend Evening Service By 1 Loop
8 $222,723.60 *Route 28 Ave Maria & Immokalee Increase Frequency During The Day - Add 1 Loop
9 $167,042.70 *Route 27 Collier Blvd & Immokalee Rd Extend Morning Service By 1 Loop
10 $606,975.00 *Route 13 City of Naples and Bayshore Increased Frequency To Peak Service - Add 4 Loop and Purchase a
Bus
11 $200,000.00 Throughout Collier County Enhance accessibility to bus stops to meet Americans with Disabilities
Act (ADA) requirements - 10 stops a year
12 $480,000.00 Throughout Collier County Construct 12 new bus shelters & amenities per year (bike rack,
bench, trash can, etc.)
*Includes cost for 3 years of operation based on existing routes costs.
2019 Transit Unfunded Priorities
9.B.4
Packet Pg. 315 Attachment: 2019 Transit Priorities (9253 : Approve 2019 Congestion Management, Highway, Bridge and
06/14/2019
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Approve 2019 Bike-Ped Priorities
OBJECTIVE: To approve the 2019 Bike-Ped Priorities.
CONSIDERATIONS: The only substantive change to the Bike-Ped Priorities shown in Attachment 1 from
those the Board approved in 2018 is the deletion o f #14, Immokalee Rd Shared Use Pathway between Strand
Blvd and Northbrooke Dr. County staff concurs with the Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee’s
recommendation that this project be removed and resubmitted at a future time. All of the other projects have
already been programmed in the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) as shown in Attachment 1.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: At the May 20, 2019 meeting, the Citizens Advisory Committee
voted to endorse the 2019 Bike/Ped priorities as shown in Attachment 1. The Technical Advisory Committee
did not have a quorum on May 20th and could not take formal action. At the May 21, 2019 meeting, the
Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) voted 7:2 to endorse the list with the following two
exceptions:
Rank Project Name & Description Status
2 Vanderbilt Drive Sidewalk and Crosswalk FPN 43800921 PE FY21; CST FY23
14 Immokalee Rd 10’ Shared Use Path Unfunded
Committee members stated that the Vanderbilt Drive project should be changed to add bike lanes instead of a
sidewalk. However, it’s a moot point concerning the priorities list because the project has already been
funded. Although having voted to endorse the TIP, BPAC members later commented that the TIP should also
be modified to reflect this change. The project sheet in the FY20-24 TIP is shown in Attachment 2. County
staff will give a brief presentation explaining why the proposed change is infeasible. The presentation was not
completed at the time of agenda production and will be distributed at the meeting.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the Board approve the 2019 Bike-Ped Priorities as shown in
Attachment 1.
Prepared by: Anne McLaughlin, Executive Director
ATTACHMENT(S)
1. 2019 Bike-Ped Priorities (PDF)
2. FY20-24 TIP Project Sheet FPN 43800921 Vanderbilt Drive Sidewalk (PDF)
9.C
Packet Pg. 316
06/14/2019
COLLIER COUNTY
Metropolitan Planning Organization
Item Number: 9.C
Doc ID: 9258
Item Summary: Approve 2019 Bike-Ped Priorities
Meeting Date: 06/14/2019
Prepared by:
Title: – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Karen Intriago
06/06/2019 12:39 PM
Submitted by:
Title: Executive Director - MPO – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Anne McLaughlin
06/06/2019 12:39 PM
Approved By:
Review:
Metropolitan Planning Organization Brandy Otero MPO Analyst Review Completed 06/06/2019 12:43 PM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin MPO Executive Director Review Completed 06/06/2019 12:59 PM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin Meeting Pending 06/14/2019 9:00 AM
9.C
Packet Pg. 317
Rank Project NameProject DescriptionAmount RequestedSubmitting Agency/ JurisdictionPhase/Amount Funded in Work ProgramFPN 1 County Barn Rd 10' Shared Use Path - west side Davis BlvdRattlesnake Hammock Rd$1,411,482 Collier CountyPE $176,000 CST $1,879,37643809112 Vanderbilt Drive Sidewalk and crosswalk Vanderbilt Beach Rd 109th Ave N$272,248 Collier CountyPE $151,000 CST $709,07543809213 Green Blvd5' Bike Lanes - both sides Santa Barbara Blvd Sunshine Blvd $567,750 Collier CountyPE $226,000 CST $1,084,67043809315 S. Golf Dr5-ft sidewalks, crosswalks, bikelanes, parking on north side500' West of US 41 & 7th St N7th St. N. & '400 eastof Gulf Shore Blvd N$880,000 City of NaplesCST $1,976.74944043716 Pine Ridge Road 6' sidewalk - south side Whippoorwill LaneNapa Blvd$561,800 Collier Countydeleted at County's requestn/a7 111th Ave N5' Bike Lanes/Paved Shoulders - both sides7th St N N from Bluebill Ave Bridge $480,000Collier CountyCST $553,41044184618Mandarin GreenwaySidewalk LoopSidewalks Banyan Blvd & on Pine Ct Orchid Dr$299,500 City of NaplesPE $45,311 CST $349,40744043619 Bald Eagle Dr8' Shared Use Pathway - west side (coded as sidewalk)Collier Blvd.Old Marco Lane $344,030City of MarcoIslandCST $509,685441878110Everglades City -Copeland Ave SSidewalksTraffic Circle by Everglades City HallChokoloskee Bay Causeway$410,000Everglades CityPE-ENV $415,000 CST $497,632437096111 Lake Trafford Rd 6' SidewalksCarson Rd Laurel St $492,800Collier CountyCST $572,675443375412Inlet Dr. - AddisonCourt Pathway8' Shared Use Pathway - east and south side Travida Terr. Addison Ct$299,707City of MarcoIslandCST $411,781441879113 Lake Trafford Rd 5' Bike LanesLittle League RdLaurel St $780,500 Collier CountyCST $$800,460443375314 Immokalee Rd 10' Shared Use Pathway Strand BlvdNorthbrooke Dr $1,209,219 Collier County2019 Bike/Ped Priorities (2018 list updated to 2019 FDOT Tentative Work program Report)Limitsdeleted at BPAC recommendation, County concurs9.C.1Packet Pg. 318Attachment: 2019 Bike-Ped Priorities (9258 : Approve 2019 Bike-Ped Priorities)
9.C.2
Packet Pg. 319 Attachment: FY20-24 TIP Project Sheet FPN 43800921 Vanderbilt Drive Sidewalk (9258 : Approve 2019
06/14/2019
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Recommendation to approve the Selection Committee’s ranking and authorize entering into
negotiations with Tindale Oliver for a contract related to Request for Professional Services (RPS)
Number 19-7562, “Collier County Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP)”
OBJECTIVE: To approve the staff selection committee’s ranking and authorize staff to negotiate a
contract to provide consultant services to develop the Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP).
CONSIDERATION: On February 21, 2019, Collier County’s Procurement Services Division released
notices of Request for Professional Services No. 19 -7562, Strategic Highway Safety Plan. Staff notified
eighteen thousand, five hundred and eighty-two (18,582) firms, sixty-three (63) firms downloaded the
solicitation package and the MPO received four (4) proposals by the March 19, 2019 due date. All four
firms were found to be responsive and responsible. The Selection Committee met on April 16, 2019, and
as described in step 1 of the solicitation documents, scored each of the proposals and shortlisted the top
three firms to move on to step 2, presentations. The Selection Committee shortlisted the three firms in the
following order:
Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc.
Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc.
Cambridge Systematics, Inc.
On May 30, 2019, the Selection Committee reconvened for step 2. Presentations were given, and the
Committee ranked the firms as follows:
Company Name Ranking
Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. 1
Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc. 2
Cambridge Systematics, Inc. 3
Staff recommends approval of the Selection Committee’s recommended final ranking and requests
authorization to begin contract negotiations with the top ranked firm, Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. If
contract negotiations are not successful with Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc., staff requests
authorization to start contract negotiations with the remaining ranked firms in the order set forth above.
Once an acceptable contract has been negotiated, staff will bring that agreement back to the MPO for
approval.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: Comments, after review and discussion, from the Technical
Advisory Committee and Citizens Advisory Committee are reflected in the final scope of services.
Contracting matters are not presented to committees.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the MPO Board approves the Selection Committee’s final
ranking for RPS No. 19-7562, Strategic Highway Safety Plan, authorize staff to enter into negotiations
with the number one ranked firm, Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc., as set forth above, and bring a
negotiated contract back for approval at a future Board Meeting.
Prepared by: Eric Ortman, MPO Senior Planner
9.D
Packet Pg. 320
06/14/2019
ATTACHMENT(S)
1. 19-7562 Final Ranking (PDF)
2. 19-7562 Notice of Recommended Award (PDF)
3. 19-7562 Solicitation (PDF)
4. 19-7562 Tindale Oliver Proposal (PDF)
9.D
Packet Pg. 321
06/14/2019
COLLIER COUNTY
Metropolitan Planning Organization
Item Number: 9.D
Doc ID: 9249
Item Summary: Recommendation to approve the Selection Committee’s ranking and authorize
entering into negotiations with Tindale Oliver for a contract related to Request for Professional Services
(RPS) Number 19-7562, “Collier County Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP)”
Meeting Date: 06/14/2019
Prepared by:
Title: – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Karen Intriago
06/06/2019 8:25 AM
Submitted by:
Title: Executive Director - MPO – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Anne McLaughlin
06/06/2019 8:25 AM
Approved By:
Review:
Metropolitan Planning Organization Brandy Otero MPO Analyst Review Completed 06/06/2019 8:38 AM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin MPO Executive Director Review Completed 06/06/2019 8:41 AM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin Meeting Pending 06/14/2019 9:00 AM
9.D
Packet Pg. 322
9.D.1Packet Pg. 323Attachment: 19-7562 Final Ranking (9249 : Recommendation to approve the Selection Committee’s ranking for SHSP)
9.D.2
Packet Pg. 324 Attachment: 19-7562 Notice of Recommended Award (9249 : Recommendation to approve the Selection Committee’s ranking for SHSP)
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
REQUEST FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (RPS)
In accordance with Florida Statute 287.055
Consultants’ Competitive Negotiation Act
FOR
COLLIER COUNTY STRATEGIC HIGHWAY SAFETY PLAN
RPS NO.: 19-7562
EVELYN COLON, PROCUREMENT STRATEGIST
PROCUREMENT SERVICES DIVISION
3295 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST, BLDG C-2
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112
TELEPHONE: (239) 252-2667
evelyn.colon@colliercountyfl.gov (Email)
This proposal solicitation document is prepared in a Microsoft Word format (rev 8/16/17). Any
alterations to this document made by the Consultant may be grounds for rejection of proposal,
cancellation of any subsequent award, or any other legal remedies available to the Collier County
Government.
9.D.3
Packet Pg. 325 Attachment: 19-7562 Solicitation (9249 : Recommendation to approve the Selection Committee’s ranking for SHSP)
SOLICITATION PUBLIC NOTICE
REQUEST FOR PROFESSINAL
SERVICES (RPS) NUMBER:
19-7562
PROJECT TITLE: Collier County Strategic Highway Safety Plan
RPS OPENING DAY/DATE/TIME: March 19, 2019 at 3:00PM
PLACE OF RPS OPENING: Procurement Services Division
3295 Tamiami Trail East, Bldg. C-2
Naples, FL 34112
All proposals shall be submitted online via the Collier County Procurement Services Division Online Bidding System:
https://www.bidsync.com/bidsync-cas/
INTRODUCTION
As requested by the Metropolitan Planning Organization (hereinafter, the “Division”), the Collier County Board of County
Commissioners Procurement Services Division (hereinafter, “County”) has issued this Request for Professional Services
(hereinafter, “RPS”) with the intent of obtaining proposals from interested and qualified Consultants in accordance with the terms,
conditions and specifications stated or attached. The Consultant, at a minimum, must achieve the requirements of the
Specifications or Scope of Work stated.
The results of this solicitation may be used by other County departments once awarded according to the Board of County
Commissioners Procurement Ordinance, as amended.
BACKGROUND
Collier County’s Traffic Operations Division submitted the original project description to the Congestion Management Committee
(CMC) for prioritization in 2013. The MPO Board approved the project in its list of priorities for its Transportation Management
Area (TMA) Surface Transportation-Urban (SU)) funds in 2013.
The County-wide Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) is called for in the Collier MPO’s Unified Planning Work Program
(UPWP) and in the MPO’s Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) – FPN# 4350411. Work is scheduled to begin in FY 2019.
The project definition in the original CMC application reads:
“To develop a comprehensive SHSP with input from a broad range of stakeholders within a strategic
planning process through public input meetings, workshops with focus groups, and partnership with
federal, state and local agencies. The outcome is to prioritize opportunities to improve highway safety;
budget programs and projects; implement highway safety strategies; and reduce the loss of life, injuries
and property damage while improving the performance and capacity of the county-wide street and
highway network. A SHSP for Collier County will better position the County and incorporated cities
within the county to identify projects and to obtain state and federal funding to improve the safety of the
streets and highways within Collier County. The purpose of the SHSP is to:
1. Identify and define areas to improve the safety of Collier County’s streets and highways.
2. Define strategies and projects, including: improvements to infrastructure (Engineering);
driver, bicycle and pedestrian behavior (Education); law enforcement programs
(Enforcement); and response of emergency medical services (Emergency Services).
3. Identify federal, state and local funding programs.
4. Provide structure for evaluating the progress in reducing crashes and fatalities.”
The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) 2016 SHSP is another point of reference. FDOT relies on the “4 Es” –
engineering, education, enforcement, and emergency response – as a tool to guide decision-making for improving roadway safety.
The 4 E’s are used to help identify and organize overarching strategies in a comprehensive manner.
See: http://www.fdot.gov/safety/SHSP2016/FDOT_2016SHSP_Final.pdf
TERM OF CONTRACT
County reserves the right to modify this scope during negotiations for budgetary reasons.
The Consultant must complete the final report within nine (9) months of the issuance of the Notice to Proceed (NTP). Although
9.D.3
Packet Pg. 326 Attachment: 19-7562 Solicitation (9249 : Recommendation to approve the Selection Committee’s ranking for SHSP)
price is not being considered at this point in the process, the final cost proposal from the selected vendor must fall within the
available budget of $200,000.
DETAILED SCOPE OF WORK
The Collier MPO uses the County’s Web-based Crash Data Management System (CDMS) for its crash related data. To maintain
continuity of data, the CDMS will provide the statistical basis for developing the SHSP. The CDMS provides GIS mapping, crash
data records management, analysis and safety project development.
SAFETY PERFORMANCE MEASURES AND TARGETS
Safety is the first national goal identified in the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act. Under the Highway Safety
Improvement Program and Safety Performance Management Measures Rule published in the Federal Register in March 2016, all
Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) were required to adopt Safety Performance Targets by the end of February 2018, and
report progress to the State DOT.
FDOT adopted “Vision Zero” targets to meet its goal of no fatalities or injuries for the State. Collier MPO adopted FDOT’s Vision Zero
safety targets for the national Safety Performance Measures as follow:
1. Number of Fatalities – 0
2. Rate of Fatalities per 100 million Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) - 0
3. Number of Serious Injuries - 0
4. Rate of Serious Injuries per 100 million VMT - 0
5. Number of Non-motorized Fatalities and Serious Injuries - 0
The SHSP is intended to guide the Collier MPO in identifying projects and programs that support FDOT’s Vision Zero safety
targets.
TASKS
PART ONE – PROJECT MANAGEMENT & PUBLIC OUTREACH
1. Project Management - provide over-all project management, QA/QC review of documents and provide support services as
needed. Activities include a project kick-off meeting, and management and oversight of the activities and products
produced by the consultant team members. If subconsultants are used, primary consultant will coordinate delivery of sub-
consultant work products, provide technical support during staff review of products and communicate needed revisions to
the sub-consultants.
2. Public Outreach – Consultant will develop a Public Involvement Plan (PIP) for the project. PIP will provide on-line
opportunities for public input by establishing an interactive project web site and use of social media. Consultant will
provide on-line surveys, prepare necessary materials, exhibits, presentations, and handouts for meetings with the MPO
Board and Advisory Committees. Consultant will hold one general, public meeting with outreach conducted to the MPO’s
Advisory Network. Staff will provide the Consultant with the MPO’s Advisor Network email list-serve. Consultant will
take minutes and record verbal and documented comments from the public, staff and elected officials and keep a record of
how comments were addressed. Staff may choose to supplement the consultant-supported outreach by giving presentations
to local homeowner’s and civic associations and by hosting informational booths at special events. The MPO will follow
its Government to Government Public Outreach policy to conduct outreach to Tribal entities. MPO staff will present to the
CAC and BPAC. MPO staff will coordinate periodic courtesy reviews by FDOT and incorporate suggested revisions
into staff comments provided to the Consultant.
The Consultant will present to the following entities during the development of the draft and final SHSP. The Consultant
should plan on presenting at six meetings:
(2) MPO Board Meetings (draft and final report)
(1) Congestion Management Committee Meeting
(2) Technical Advisory Committee Meetings (draft and final report)
(1) Public Meeting/Advisor Network list-serve
3. GIS & Other Data - The Consultant will ensure the MPO receives all data pertinent to completion of the report and action
plan, including GIS shapefiles, spreadsheets, databases, and all exhibits in PDF or JPEG format.
4. Crash Report Consistency – The Consultant will collaborate with law enforcement agencies (LEA) including the: Florida
Highway Patrol, Collier County Sheriff’s Office (CCSO), City of Naples Police Department and the Marco Island Police
Department, to improve the consistency between crash forms used by each LEA, and to improve consistency between the
data input into the forms. The Consultant will compare the size and function of each LEA to each other and, for the CCSO
to other similar counties.
9.D.3
Packet Pg. 327 Attachment: 19-7562 Solicitation (9249 : Recommendation to approve the Selection Committee’s ranking for SHSP)
5. Traffic Control Signs – The Consultant will address the visibility and size of signs, particularly as it relates to aging divers;
and will develop a dynamic “stepped approach” traffic control sign enhancement program based on metrics
PART TWO – STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
1. The Consultant will have access to the County’s CDMS to conduct a comprehensive analysis of
crash locations
types
conditions
causative factors
demographics of persons involved
trends in the number of crashes, particularly traffic fatalities and serious injuries
2. The Consultant will establish base line metrics for the following statistics
a. Fatalities
b. Fatal and serious injury crashes for all road users
c. Fatal and serious injury crashes for drivers under 24
d. Fatal and serious injury crashes for drivers over 60
e. Fatal and serious injury crashes for bicyclists and pedestrians
f. Fatal and serious injury crashes for intoxicated bicyclists and pedestrians
3. The Consultant will analyze CDMS data for 2013-2017 using the mapping and analytical tools available in the CDMS
unless otherwise agreed upon by MPO staff.
4. The analysis will include CDMS-generated Heat Maps to identify high crash locations and corridors.
5. The analysis will address each of FDOT’s SHSP 12 Emphasis Areas as they relate to Collier MPO member entities,
presented in order of the number of statewide fatalities each represents, from greatest to least. FDOT ranked the following
list based on statewide statistics. The Consultant will re-order the list based on Collier County statistics (inclusive of Cities
of Naples, Marco Island and Everglades City.)
PART THREE – RECOMMENDATIONS
1. The Consultant will develop program and project recommendations that address the 4 Es for the Emphasis Areas that prove
to be most significant in Collier County in terms of causing significant injuries and fatalities. Engineering recommendations
will conform to FHWA’s Proven Safety Countermeasures. See: https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/provencountermeasures/
2. The Consultant will link each recommended program and project to currently available federal, state and local funding
programs based on eligibility.
3. The Consultant will consider projected revenues provided by the MPO to propose a timeline for implementing the
recommendations within the following categories
a. Short-term – 5-yr TIP; 2-yr UPWP (up to two cycles, 4 years)
b. Mid-term – 6-10 years out
c. Long-term – 11-15 years out
4. The Consultant will provide a structure for evaluating the progress in reducing crashes and fatalities based on the MPO’s
adoption of FDOT’s Vision Zero safety targets for the national Safety Performance Measures.
PART FOUR – DRAFT AND FINAL DOCUMENT
1. The Consultant will compile a comprehensive first draft of the SHSP for review by MPO staff, followed by the MPO
TAC, CMC, CAC, BPAC, and Board
2. The Consultant will prepare a final draft SHSP based on comments received, for review by MPO staff, followed by the
MPO TAC, CMS, CAC, BPAC and Board
3. The Consultant will make any final changes necessary based on actions taken by the MPO Board when voting on the
SHSP for adoption.
4. The Consultant will submit all associated electronic files, spreadsheets, original graphics and GIS shapefiles to the MPO
5. The Consultant will provide twenty (20) hard copies of final report
1 Lane Departure Crashes 7 Aging Drivers
2 Impaired Driving crashes 8 Speeding and Aggressive Driving Crashes
3 Pedestrians and Bicyclists (aka “Vulnerable Road
Users”)
9 Commercial Motor Vehicle Crashes
4 Intersection Crashes 10 Teen Driver Crashes
5 Unrestrained Occupants 11 Distracted Driving Crashes
6 Motorcyclists (aka “Vulnerable Road User”) 12 Work Zone Crashes
9.D.3
Packet Pg. 328 Attachment: 19-7562 Solicitation (9249 : Recommendation to approve the Selection Committee’s ranking for SHSP)
RESPONSE FORMAT AND SCORING CRITERIA FOR DEVELOPMENT OF SHORTLIST:
Proposals must be assembled, at minimum, in the order of the Evaluation Criteria listed or your proposal
may be deemed non-responsive
Evaluation Criteria Maximum Points
1. Ability of Professional Personnel 20 Points
2. Certified Minority Business Enterprise 5 Points
3. Past Performance 25 Points
4. Project Approach, Willingness to Meet Time and Budget Requirements 20 Points
5. Location 10 Points
6. Recent, Current, and Projected Workloads of the Firm 20 Points
TOTAL POSSIBLE POINTS 100 Points
For complete explanation of each evaluation criteria, please see the file titled “RPS Instructions” included with this
advertisement.
VENDOR CHECKLIST
Vendor should check off each of the following items as the necessary action is completed (please see, Form 2: Vendor
Check List):
The Solicitation Submittal has been signed.
All applicable forms have been signed and included, along with licenses to complete the requirements of the project.
Required Reference Questionnaires have been completed for previous projects and included with the proposal.
Any addenda have been signed and included.
All grant requirements have been reviewed and forms completed (if applicable).
Division of Corporations - Florida Department of State – http://dos.myflorida.com/sunbiz/ (If work performed in the State).
E-Verify/Immigration Affidavit (Memorandum of Understanding).
9.D.3
Packet Pg. 329 Attachment: 19-7562 Solicitation (9249 : Recommendation to approve the Selection Committee’s ranking for SHSP)
9.D.4
Packet Pg. 330 Attachment: 19-7562 Tindale Oliver Proposal (9249 : Recommendation to approve the Selection Committee’s ranking for SHSP)
COLLIER MPO | Collier County Strategic Highway Safety Plan 1
March 19, 2019
Ms. Evelyn Colon
Procurement Strategist
Collier County Procurement Services Division
3295 Tamiami Trail East, Building C-2
Naples, FL 34112
Re: RPS No. 19-7562 – Collier County Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP)
Dear Ms. Colon:
In Collier County from 2013 to 2017 , 179 people died in motor vehicle traffic crashes and
13,326 people were injured. Over this time period, Collier County crash injuries increased
by 19%, whereas the County’s population increased by only 10%. Statewide, traffic crash
injuries increased even faster than in Collier County, with a 21.6% increase from 2013 to
2017, and the per-capita injury rate also is higher, at 11.75 injuries per 1,000 persons
compared to only 7.5 injuries per 1,000 persons in Collier County.
Although Collier County has outperformed Florida as a whole, the fact that traffic injuries
have outpaced population growth and the potential that the County will “regress to the
mean” over time are cause for concern. Whereas much of the traffic safety industry focuses
on short-term engineering solutions to resolve location-specific safety issues, Collier
County has an opportunity to systematically analyze highway safety and proactively
implement strategies to reduce crashes, injuries, and fatalities before the situation
worsens.
Tindale Oliver is pleased to submit this proposal as an expression of our interest in working
collaboratively with the Collier MPO and its partners on the Strategic Highway Safety Plan
(SHSP). Since our establishment in 1989, we have specialized in supporting MPOs
throughout the evolution of Federal planning requirements, from ISTEA in 1991 to the FAST
Act in 2015. Currently, we serve as an on-call consultant to 14 MPOs in Florida and have
successfully led dozens of projects for MPOs and communities throughout the state.
Tindale Oliver has been involved in traffic safety since 1999 when we began working with
Florida communities to map and analyze motor vehicle crash data. Since that time, we
have implemented GIS-enabled crash data systems for more than a dozen clients and have
worked with FDOT in the Tampa Bay (District 7) and Southeast Florida (District 4) regions
to provide on-call traffic safety engineering services. Accordingly, we have unmatched
knowledge of the strengths and limitations of Florida crash data, as well as significant
knowledge of safety program and project development processes for both the State
Highway System and local roads.
Tindale Oliver has provided exceptional service to the Collier MPO from its Tampa
headquarters since 2010 and to Collier County since 1998. For the Collier SHSP, our Project
Manager and most key staff will serve the MPO from that office; however, Wally Blain will
serve as the Team’s Deputy Project Manager from our Southwest Florida location in Collier
County. In addition to leveraging his metropolitan planning experience to integrate SHSP
recommendations into the MPO’s LRTP, CMP, and TIP, he will serve as a local liaison to
help facilitate project communication and collaboration with the MPO and partner agency
stakeholders.
The Valerin Group will assist Tindale Oliver to lead public engagement activities associated
with SHSP development. Valerin provides public information services for FDOT District 1
and specializes in transportation sector public involvement and marketing, and will help to
develop non-infrastructure strategies as part of the County’s SHSP.
PROJECT NAME
Collier County Strategic
Highway Safety Plan
PRIME CONSULTANT
Tindale Oliver
1000 N. Ashley Drive
Suite 400
Tampa, FL 33602
PROJECT CONTACTS
Demian Miller, AICP
Principal
Role: Project Manager
(813) 224-8862
DMiller@tindaleoliver.com
Wally Blain, AICP
Senior Project Manager
Role: Deputy Project Manager
(239) 298-8007
WBlain@tindaleoliver.com
SUB-CONSULTANT
The Valerin Group, Inc.*
Tampa, FL
* DBE Certified
9.D.4
Packet Pg. 331 Attachment: 19-7562 Tindale Oliver Proposal (9249 : Recommendation to approve the Selection Committee’s ranking for SHSP)
COLLIER MPO | Collier County Strategic Highway Safety Plan 2
Letter of Interest
The primary objective of this proposal is to demonstrate what experience differentiates us from the competition, the most
important of which are as follows:
1. Crash Data Analysis Expertise – We have worked with Florida traffic crash data for two decades and have developed
custom solutions for warehousing, data quality control, and analysis. Our ability to combine data from the Collier County
webCDMS with statewide data resources, demographic data, and transportation system asset/inventory data allows us to
not only analyze trends and conditions within Collier County, but also to benchmark that analysis with statewide data.
Because our team will have no learning curve with respect to crash data or Collier demographic, transit, or asset data, we
will be able to dedicate a greater component of the project budget to public and stakeholder engagement, strategic and
location-specific recommendations, and implementation planning.
2. Traffic Safety Engineering and Program Management Experience – Our staff have completed hundreds of safety
engineering assignments, including high-crash location reviews, Road Safety Audits, and systemic analyses to deploy
low-cost countermeasures. Additionally, we have assisted in developing strategic plans to address bicycle and pedestrian
issues, bridge safety, and rural road lane departure and intersection crash concerns. Tindale Oliver also has developed and
implemented non-infrastructure strategies, including administration of targeted enforcement grants, driver education
supplemental curricula, and school safety programs. Rudy Umbs, who will serve as Senior Advisor for this project, formerly
served as FHWA’s Chief Safety Engineer and also led FHWA’s Resource Center, responsible for technical training nationally.
His knowledge of safety program development combined with the Team’s efforts in Florida will ensure that SHSP
recommendations are founded in proven strategies to get results for Collier County.
3. Previous Experience with Collier MPO and Collier County – Since 2010, Tindale Oliver has worked closely with Collier
MPO staff by serving as a General Planning Consultant, completing task orders related to transit planning, bicycle/
pedestrian safety, 2010 base-year model data review, and 2035 and 2040 LRTP support. We have an exceptional working
relationship with Collier County Planning, Collier Area Transit, and other MPO partners in the region. This local experience,
combined with our overall metropolitan planning and local government infrastructure planning experience, means that
strategies recommended as part of the SHSP will have clear, cost-feasible implementation actions.
Tindale Oliver values our long-term relationship with the Collier MPO. With this proposal, we are expressing our enthusiasm for
continuing to support the MPO in making Southwest Florida a great place to live, work, and play.
We take pride in our recent work with the Collier MPO and look forward to continuing these efforts as part of the Strategic
Highway Safety Plan. We anticipate further discussing with you related to our team’s abilities and approach during Step 2 of the
selection process. Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Demian Miller, AICP Wally Blain, AICP
Project Manager Deputy Project Manager
9.D.4
Packet Pg. 332 Attachment: 19-7562 Tindale Oliver Proposal (9249 : Recommendation to approve the Selection Committee’s ranking for SHSP)
COLLIER MPO | Collier County Strategic Highway Safety Plan
Table of Contents
COLLIER METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION (MPO)
COLLIER COUNTY STRATEGIC HIGHWAY SAFETY PLAN
Letter of Interest
Tab 1: Ability of Professional Personnel ..................................................................................................1-1
Introduction........................................................................................................................................................ 1-1
Team Overview ................................................................................................................................................... 1-1
Teaming Partnerships ........................................................................................................................................ 1-2
Project Management Team ................................................................................................................................ 1-3
Tindale Oliver Team Organization Chart ........................................................................................................... 1-4
Tindale Oliver Team Resumes ........................................................................................................................... 1-5
Tab 2: Certified Minority Business Enterprise ..........................................................................................2-1
The Valerin Group DBE Certification .................................................................................................................. 2-2
Tab 3: Past Performance .......................................................................................................................3-1
Reference Questionnaires and Project Summaries .......................................................................................... 3-1
Tab 4: Project Approach, Willingness to Meet Time and Budget Requirements ...........................................4-1
Project Approach ................................................................................................................................................ 4-1
Tindale Oliver Proposed Project Schedule ........................................................................................................ 4-4
Budget Control and On-Time Delivery .............................................................................................................. 4-5
Conclusion .......................................................................................................................................................... 4-5
Quality Control/Assurance (Graphic)................................................................................................................. 4-6
Tab 5: Location .....................................................................................................................................5-1
Office Locations .................................................................................................................................................. 5-1
Tab 6: Recent, Current and Projected Workloads of the Firm ....................................................................6-1
Closeout of Recent Work .................................................................................................................................... 6-1
Current Workload ............................................................................................................................................... 6-1
Projected Projects .............................................................................................................................................. 6-1
Tab 7: Required Forms ..........................................................................................................................7-1
Tindale Oliver Board of Professional Engineers License
Tindale Oliver Certificate of Corporate Status
Vendor Checklist
Conflict of Interest Affidavit
Vendor Declaration Statement
Immigration Affidavit Certification
Vendor Substitute W-9
Insurance and Bonding Requirements
Federal Contract Provisions
Certification Regarding Debarment
Certification Regarding Lobbying
Conflict of Interest Certification
Anticipated Disadvantaged, Minority, Women or Veteran Participation Statement
Bid Opportunity List
Acknowledgement of Terms, Conditions and Grant Clauses
9.D.4
Packet Pg. 333 Attachment: 19-7562 Tindale Oliver Proposal (9249 : Recommendation to approve the Selection Committee’s ranking for SHSP)
9.D.4
Packet Pg. 334 Attachment: 19-7562 Tindale Oliver Proposal (9249 : Recommendation to approve the Selection Committee’s ranking for SHSP)
COLLIER MPO | Collier County Strategic Highway Safety Plan 1 - 1
Tab 1 – Ability of Professional Personnel
INTRODUCTION
The integration of traffic safety engineering, safety program
management/strategic planning, and MPO plan and process
integration is at the core of Tindale Oliver’s overall approach
to transportation planning and engineering. In 2018, our traffic
safety and metropolitan planning solution areas accounted for
more than 40% of our overall workload, demonstrating that
the services being requested by the Collier MPO fall well within
the core competencies of our firm.
The ability of our professional personnel is well-suited to the
Collier MPO’s needs across three key areas:
> Safety Data and Analysis: Tindale Oliver developed and
maintains the County’s Crash Data Management System
(CDMS), and staff assigned to this project have been
working with traffic crash data for nearly two decades.
> Safety Countermeasures and Program Management:
Our team routinely works with FDOT and other clients to
define big-picture safety issues and then drill down to
identify specific countermeasure strategies, including
integration of non-infrastructure approaches.
> Implementation: Our staff have a sound understanding of
the metropolitan planning process and a long history of
working with Collier County and the Collier MPO. This
means that recommendations developed as part of this
project will have clear, cost-feasible implementation
guidance and that post-plan performance measures and
monitoring strategies will be sound and effective to refine
strategies going forward.
TEAM OVERVIEW
Tindale Oliver
Tindale Oliver & Associates, Inc. (dba Tindale Oliver), founded
in 1989 and established as an S-Corporation in the State of
Florida, celebrates its 30th anniversary this year. Over our
three decades in business, we have developed a reputation as
a leader in providing quality, innovative planning and
engineering services to our public sector clients. The founders
and subsequent leaders of the firm come from public sector
backgrounds that translate to a practical understanding of
issues that government officials face in planning, designing,
financing, and implementing projects and policies. Our major
business activities involve four primary solution areas:
> Transportation
> Transit
> Community Planning & Design
> Public Finance
Tindale Oliver has grown from a firm of 3 employees in 1989 to
100+ employees in 2019, with staff certifications including
professional engineers, certified planners, LEED and GIS
professionals, and accessibility inspectors, among others, as
well as numerous planners, economists, and GIS analysts. With
staff throughout Florida (Tampa, Miami, Jacksonville, Naples,
Bartow, Fort Lauderdale), Maryland (Baltimore), and
Washington (Seattle), Tindale Oliver has supported transit
clients in 21 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico.
Traffic Safety
Tindale Oliver’s traffic safety practice area includes traditional
traffic design and traffic operations disciplines, but also adds
unique capabilities related to traffic safety in terms of both
site-specific countermeasure development and support for
systemic and programmatic safety solutions. Relevant aspects
of our traffic safety practice include:
> Crash data management and analysis
> Pedestrian/Bicycle Safety Action Plans (P/BSAPs)
> System safety screening and countermeasure
identification
> Roadway Safety Audits (RSAs)
> Community Traffic Safety Team (CTST) support
> Safety countermeasure design
> High-crash location review
> Safety planning/federal law implementation
> Pedestrian and bicycle corridor studies
9.D.4
Packet Pg. 335 Attachment: 19-7562 Tindale Oliver Proposal (9249 : Recommendation to approve the Selection Committee’s ranking for SHSP)
COLLIER MPO | Collier County Strategic Highway Safety Plan 1 - 2
Tab 1 – Ability of Professional Personnel
Tindale Oliver serves as a safety studies consultant for two of
Florida’s seven regional DOT Districts and provides web-based
crash data mapping services to 11 jurisdictions around the
state. Our staff also serve as experts for the Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA) and provide training and technical
support for the Pedestrian Focus Cities/States initiative.
Metropolitan Planning
Since 1989, Tindale Oliver has specialized in metropolitan
planning for MPOs/TPOs and currently serves as a General
Planning Consultant to 14 MPOs/TPOs throughout Florida, as
illustrated in the map below. Our metropolitan planning
experience includes:
> Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) development
> Congestion Management Process (CMP) development
> Financial planning
> Transit planning
> Bicycle and pedestrian planning
> Greenways and trails master plan development
> Corridor and subarea studies
> Performance measures and monitoring
As part of our overall metropolitan planning practice we
continually monitor, review, and evaluate federal planning
requirements since implementation of the Intermodal Surface
Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA) of 1991 and subsequent
reauthorizations (TEA-21, SAFETEA-LU, MAP-21, FAST Act). We
also routinely work with Federal Highway Safety Improvement
Program (HSIP) funding and understand how this can be
leveraged to implement the County’s SHSP.
The Valerin Group (Valerin)
Established in 2006, The Valerin Group, Inc. (Valerin) is a
woman-owned, full-service communications firm
headquartered in Tampa, with offices in South Florida and
Orlando. A certified DBE and MBE firm with FDOT, Valerin
works to operate a lean and efficient organization, employing
a highly-capable and multi-talented staff of 15 full-time and 2
contract employees.
Valerin specializes in public involvement, public information,
community outreach, graphic and website design, multimedia,
marketing and branding, bilingual translations, photography,
and drone services. Its professional staff have more than 275
years of combined experience, having served on more than 500
public utility and transportation-related projects for public
sector clients. Its years of experience in filling a broad range of
roles as subconsultant and prime consultant to county,
municipal, and state entities such as FDOT, expressway
authorities, and transit agencies equip the firm with a
thorough understanding of processes and protocols, allowing
it to essentially hit the ground running in completing project
tasks and deliverables in an effective and timely manner.
Valerin’s services are further enhanced by providing oral and
written Spanish/English translation services as demographics
may warrant.
TEAMING PARTNERSHIPS
Tindale Oliver has worked closely
with Valerin on multiple projects
over the last five years, including
the FDOT District 7/Pasco County
Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety
Action Plan, the HART Transit
Development Plan/
Comprehensive Operational
Analysis, and the Palmtran
Transit Development Plan (TDP).
As part of Tindale Oliver’s Project
Management Planning process,
we work with all subconsultants
to ensure a mutual
understanding of roles and
expected project outcomes. We
also work to integrate QA/QC
plans and project document
templates to ensure a high-
quality, technically-correct, and
seamless work product for our
clients.
9.D.4
Packet Pg. 336 Attachment: 19-7562 Tindale Oliver Proposal (9249 : Recommendation to approve the Selection Committee’s ranking for SHSP)
COLLIER MPO | Collier County Strategic Highway Safety Plan 1 - 3
Tab 1 – Ability of Professional Personnel
PROJECT MANAGEMENT TEAM
Demian Miller, AICP, Project Manager
Demian has served as a planner, project manager,
and Principal-in-Charge on a wide range of
transportation planning and engineering projects
for city and county governments, MPOs, FDOT,
and FHWA. His areas of expertise include
geographic information systems/transportation data
management, traffic safety and safety program management,
bicycle and pedestrian safety and mobility, multimodal
corridor and sub-area studies, and growth management/
policy planning. He also has provided support to long range
transportation planning projects and land use/community
planning projects. In addition to his management
responsibilities for Tindale Oliver’s Corridor/Sub-Area and
Traffic Safety service areas, he serves as an instructor for
FHWA’s “Focused Approach to Pedestrian Safety” and has
provided technical assistance and led “Designing for
Pedestrian Safety” workshops for FHWA.
Demian will handle the day-to-day management activities for
the Collier MPO Strategic Highway Safety Plan.
Wally Blain, AICP, Deputy Project Manager
Wally has far-reaching experience in long-range
multimodal planning. Building on solid technical
skills in travel demand modeling, GIS, data
analysis, and an understanding of the planning
process, he is an integral part of the Multimodal Planning
team that provides support for metropolitan and long-range
comprehensive planning. He has a comprehensive
understanding of Federal metropolitan planning regulations
and the Florida MPO Handbook. Working for 10 years as staff
for the Hillsborough MPO, he was the project manager for
development of the Transportation Improvement Program
(TIP) and led multiple tasks of several LRTP updates. He also
has considerable experience making presentations to
committees and elected officials on controversial and difficult
projects regarding the need for transportation improvements
balanced with community desires expressed in community
and comprehensive plans.
For the Collier MPO Strategic Highway Safety Plan, Wally will
assist with day-to-day management activities. Residing in
Collier County, he will provide direct access to MPO staff and
will aid in efficient project coordination meetings, as
discussed in Tab 4.
Rudy Umbs, P.E., Senior Advisor
After a successful and productive 39-year career
with FHWA, Rudy is now providing guidance,
technical assistance, and training to state and
local agencies (planning, engineering,
enforcement, education, and emergency services)
to further enhance their transportation programs, including
conducting pedestrian, bicycle, and ADA training and
developing and implementing Pedestrian Safety Action Plans,
Bicycle Safety Action Plans, and SAFE KIDS programs.
While with FHWA, Rudy held headquarters and field positions
in virtually every aspect of highway safety design and
operations. For FHWA headquarters, he served in a number of
leadership positions, including as Chief of Safety Design and
Operations and Chief Highway Safety Engineer. He also served
as Resource Center Program Manager for the Strategic
Highway Safety Planning, Speed Management, and Pedestrian
Program, working one-on-one with local and state agencies.
As Senior Advisor for the Strategic Highway Safety Plan, Rudy
will be a technical resource for major deliverables.
Robert Cursey, AICP, Quality Assurance/
Control
Rob leads Tindale Oliver’s Multimodal Planning
team and has served as Project Manager,
Principal-in-Charge, or Task Leader on numerous
assignments with MPOs, FDOT, and local governments.
Throughout his professional consulting career, he has been
responsible for managing and providing technical support for
transportation planning projects, including all modes of
travel, with expertise including all aspects of public sector
planning (primarily long-range transportation planning), sub-
area studies, corridor studies, travel demand modeling, and
roadway characteristics inventory.
In providing Quality Assurance oversight for the Strategic
Highway Safety Plan, Rob will be a technical resource for
review of major deliverables.
Team Organization Chart and Resumes
The Tindale Oliver Team organization chart is provided on the
next page, followed by detailed resumes of the key personnel
proposed for this project. These resumes provide additional
information on the education, professional certifications and
affiliations, experience, roles, and pertinent skill sets for all
Tindale Oliver Team key staff.
9.D.4
Packet Pg. 337 Attachment: 19-7562 Tindale Oliver Proposal (9249 : Recommendation to approve the Selection Committee’s ranking for SHSP)
COLLIER MPO | Collier County Strategic Highway Safety Plan 1 - 4
Tab 1 – Ability of Professional Personnel
Collier County MPO Strategic Highway Safety Plan
Tindale Oliver Team Organization Chart
Collier County MPO
Project Manager
Public Engagement
Michelle Green (VG)
Task Leader
Alice Ramos (VG)
Demian Miller, AICP (TO)
Wally Blain, AICP (TO)
Andrea Sauvageot (TO)
Laura Molennor (TO)
Management Team
Rob Cursey, AICP (TO)
Quality Assurance/Control
Demian Miller, AICP (TO)
Project Manager
Wally Blain, AICP (TO)
Deputy Project Manager
Rudy Umbs, P.E. (TO)
Senior Advisor
Statistical Analysis & GIS
Juan Butler, GISP (TO)
Task Leader
Patrick Dougherty (TO)
W.T. Bowman, P.E. (TO)
Buse Gengiz (TO)
Recommendations
Demian Miller, AICP (TO)
Task Leader
George Edmiston (TO)
Gary Tait (TO)
Wally Blain, AICP (TO)
W.T. Bowman, P.E. (TO)
Report
Demian Miller, AICP (TO)
Task Leader
Wally Blain, AICP (TO)
Laura Molennor (TO)
TO - Tindale Oliver
VG - Valerin Group
9.D.4
Packet Pg. 338 Attachment: 19-7562 Tindale Oliver Proposal (9249 : Recommendation to approve the Selection Committee’s ranking for SHSP)
www.tindaleoliver.com
Demian has served as a planner, project manager, and Principal-in-Charge on a wide
range of transportation planning and engineering projects for city and county
governments, metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs), the Florida Department of
Transportation (FDOT), and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). His areas of
expertise include geographic information systems/transportation data management,
traffic safety and safety program management, bicycle and pedestrian safety and
mobility, multimodal corridor and sub-area studies, and growth management/policy
planning. He also has provided support to long range transportation planning projects
as well as land use/community planning projects.
In addition to his management responsibilities for Tindale Oliver’s Corridor/Sub-Area
and Traffic Safety service areas, Demian serves as an instructor for FHWA’s “Focused
Approach to Pedestrian Safety” and has provided technical assistance and led
“Designing for Pedestrian Safety” workshops for FHWA.
Representative Projects
Heights Public Engagement & Multimodal Corridor Assessment
FDOT District 7 | Tampa, FL | Ongoing
Principal-In-Charge
The Heights Mobility Plan is an effort to improve safety and mobility in the Greater
Seminole Heights/Tampa Heights neighborhoods with a focus on the Florida Avenue
and Tampa Street/Highland Avenue corridor between downtown Tampa and the
Hillsborough River. Along with an extensive public engagement process, the Study is
working to identify short-term safety and mobility improvements while working with
the community and local agencies to develop transformative alternatives for the
corridor that better reflect the transportation needs of the community and better serve
the variety of users that this corridor serves.
Safety Studies and Minor Design
FDOT District 7 | Tampa Bay, FL | 2015-Ongoing
Principal-in-Charge
Provide a broad range of traffic safety/operations studies as well as safety program
management services. Support safety education and enforcement activities and
systemic countermeasures approaches. Prior iterations of this districtwide contract
included development of Pedestrian Safety Action Plans for three Counties and
development of GIS/web-based crash data systems.
Safety Studies/Road Safety Audits
FDOT District 4 | Southeast Florida | 2014-Ongoing
Principal-in-Charge
Conduct safety studies and road safety audits in Broward, Palm Beach, Martin, St. Lucie,
and Indian River counties to recommend short-term countermeasures and follow-up
studies focused on pedestrian safety issues, including several “hot-spot” locations
identified by FDOT Central Office. Outcomes include sign, pavement marking, lighting,
and signalization upgrades.
Demian Miller, AICP
Principal
Role: Project Manager
Office Location
Tampa, FL
Education
MA, Urban and Regional
Planning, University of
Florida (2007)
BA, Political Science,
University of Florida (1996)
Years of Experience
18
Years with Tindale Oliver
16
Certifications
AICP #021871(2007)
Professional Affiliations
American Planning
Association (APA)
Association of Traffic Safety
Information Professionals
(ATSIP)
9.D.4
Packet Pg. 339 Attachment: 19-7562 Tindale Oliver Proposal (9249 : Recommendation to approve the Selection Committee’s ranking for SHSP)
www.tindaleoliver.com
Demian Miller, AICP
Principal
Bicycle/Pedestrian Access to Transit
FDOT District 7 | Tampa Bay, FL | 2013-2018
Project Manager
Identify high-ridership locations with bicycle and pedestrian safety and/or mobility issues and conduct field reviews and
other engineering studies to identify and evaluate potential improvements. This districtwide contract also considers access
to transit on controlled access highways and innovative treatments such as “bus islands” and bus queue-jump lanes.
SR 7 Multimodal Corridor Study
Broward MPO | Broward County, FL | 2014-2016
Project Manager
Through public engagement and technical analysis, identify short and mid-term improvements to enhance mobility and
livability along SR 7/US 441, the county’s busiest transit corridor, which are expected to include “premium bus” treatments,
multimodal network enhancements, and intersection safety projects.
Citywide Mobility Plan
City of Sarasota | Sarasota, FL | 2011-2014
Project Manager
Establish mobility districts based on the City’s existing land use density/diversity, land use vision, and multimodal options
by which to vary the its development review process. Identify feasible bicycle and pedestrian projects to enhance the
multimodal network and develop a city multimodal impact fee as an alternative to the countywide roadway-only
transportation impact fee.
Tampa Walk-Bike Plan Phase I–IV
Hillsborough County MPO | Tampa, FL | 2010–2014
Project Manager
Identified and prioritized cost-feasible bicycle and pedestrian network projects to improve access to Tampa’s three major
business centers and complete the City’s overall multimodal network. Also developed a 20-mile “Green ARTery” urban trail
system through Central Tampa to connect the downtown with riverfront parks and easements, community parks and
greenspaces, and other community assets.
Hollywood/Pines Corridor Study
Broward MPO| Broward County, FL | 2012-2013
Project Manager
Conducted inaugural combined livability/congestion management project along 20-mile section of corridor, focused on
enhancing quality of life and improving safety and mobility through short- and long-term strategies and improvements for
land use, transit, biking, and walking.
Transit/Pedestrian Safety & ADA Pilot Project
FDOT District 5 | Various Counties, FL | 2011
Project Manager
Integrate evaluation and inclusion of potential transit, pedestrian, and safety enhancements/improvements within projects
included in District work program.
Pedestrian Safety Action Plan
Hillsborough County | Hillsborough County, FL | 2009–2010
Project Manager
Developed Pedestrian Safety Action Plan, including intensive analysis of pedestrian crash data, identification of
infrastructure, planning, education, and enforcement strategies to reduce pedestrian crashes and fatalities. Coordinated
participation from City, County, and MPO staff and law enforcement, developed foundation for Tampa Bay Area to receive
$0.5 million in NHTSA grant funds.
9.D.4
Packet Pg. 340 Attachment: 19-7562 Tindale Oliver Proposal (9249 : Recommendation to approve the Selection Committee’s ranking for SHSP)
www.tindaleoliver.com
After working for the Hillsborough MPO for 10 years, Wally provides a unique
understanding of MPO practice and policy requirements. His background includes
statewide experience as a consultant and daily workings with local agency partners and
FDOT as an MPO staff planner. He has developed a unique blend of skills that allows him
to effectively manage technical and policy-related tasks.
Project Experience
Transportation System Performance Report and Action Plan
Collier MPO | Naples, FL | 2019-2020 (Ongoing)
Project Manager
Following the MPO’s update to their Congestion Management Plan, Tindale Oliver was
selected for developing the first bi-annual system performance report. Anticipated to be
completed by June 2020, this analysis will review topics such as integrating reliability
measures on the collector and arterial roadway system, identify gaps in data
availability, analysis using the FDOT Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE) procedures at
selected built-out intersections and will include an action plan geared towards
identifying programmable solutions and strategies to address the and congestion
issues.
2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)
Pasco County MPO | New Port Richey, FL | 2018-2019 (On-going)
Project Manager
This project is the five-year update of the Mobility 2040 LRTP. Tindale Oliver is
responsible for coordinating and executing the full development of the 2045 LRTP.
Tasks include socio-economic data development, scenario planning, cost and revenue
analysis, public engagement, develop of the needs plan, and development of the cost
affordable plan. Innovative and key aspects of plan development include incorporation
of all modes of travel, consideration of new ACES technology elements (autonomous,
connected, electric, shared vehicles), innovative public engagement, and incorporation
of Vision 54/56 recommendations.
Bicycle/Pedestrian Master Plan
Collier MPO | Naples, FL | 2017-2019
Project Manager
Tindale Oliver was selected by the Collier MPO to conduct an update of their 2012
Comprehensive Pathways Plan. This update analyzed mobility needs of the community
and balanced those with the needs of the heavily used Shared Use Paths and on-road
bike lanes by recreational and long-distance riders. Tindale Oliver’s analysis included an
assessment of safety hot spot locations, proximity to transit routes, and an overlay of
Environmental Justice Areas. Using an online, interactive mapping website (Wikimap),
Tindale Oliver used GIS to overlay the results of the technical analysis with the public
comments regarding needed facilities. As the Project Manager, Wally was responsible to
day-to-day progress, coordination with the MPO Project Manager, and presentation to
the MPO Board and advisory committees.
2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)
Sarasota/Manatee MPO | Sarasota, FL | 2018-2020 (Ongoing)
Project Manager
In support of the MPO’s TransForum LRTP, Tindale Oliver conducted a review of current
trends and conditions the MPO will be addressing during their LRTP update. Through
Wally Blain, AICP
Senior Project Manager
Role: Deputy Project Manager
Office Location
Naples, FL
Education
BA, Geography, Stetson
University (1996)
Years of Experience
22
Years with Tindale Oliver
4
Certifications
AICP #017816
Professional Affiliations
American Planning Association
(APA)
9.D.4
Packet Pg. 341 Attachment: 19-7562 Tindale Oliver Proposal (9249 : Recommendation to approve the Selection Committee’s ranking for SHSP)
www.tindaleoliver.com
Wally Blain, AICP
Senior Project Manager
the review of existing demographic and employment conditions, Tindale Oliver helped the MPO capture topics like the
impacts of coastal and environmental considerations, commuting patterns of suburban/residential areas, and the location
of affordable housing. Tindale Oliver will also be supporting the MPO with the update of their Goals, Objectives and
Prioritization Criteria for developing the Cost Affordable 2045 LRTP.
2040 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) Amendment
Collier County MPO | Naples, FL | 2017-2018
Project Manager
Tindale Oliver was selected by the Collier MPO to analyze the impacts to the cost feasible long range transportation plan
based on revised growth assumptions of a major planned development. Analysis included review of countywide growth
projections through 2040, reallocating future growth, developing transportation alternatives and modeling performance of
the transportation system. As project Manager, Wally was responsible for day-to-day scheduling, communication with the
client, elected officials and the public on the analysis and results of the amendment.
Safety/Security Performance Measures and Target Setting
Sarasota/Manatee MPO | Sarasota , FL | 2017-2018
Project Manager
Furthering the analysis conducted for establishing the MPO’s first safety targets under the FAST Act, Wally led the analysis
required for reporting the current trends and establishment of safety targets. This analysis identified high crash locations
based on the fatal and serious injury safety performance measures. Through coordination with the MPO and the Technical
Advisory Committee, four of the top locations were selected for field assessments following the approach for road safety
audits that included a multidisciplinary team of planners, engineers, and law enforcement. These assessments generated
short, mid, and long-term recommendations for the MPO’s inclusion in future TIP priorities. Additionally, the MPO expanded
the focus of safety and security planning by hosting a regional training course aimed at identifying partnership
opportunities with emergency planning, transit providers and regional partners in developing an All-Hazards Recovery
Plan.
Vision 54/56 Corridor Study, Phases 1 & 2
Pasco County MPO | Pasco County, FL | 2015 - 2018
Project Manager
Pasco’s 2040 LRTP indicated needed improvements within SR 54/56 corridor to be based on future corridor assessment,
including significant public engagement regarding alternative improvements to the SR 54/56 corridor. Developed
consensus on optimal implementation plan for addressing congestion, safety, and mobility within corridor. Used task force
approach with public to review, discuss, and identify alternative solutions to recommend to MPO Board for further
evaluation in second phase of corridor study.
Oahu MPO Planning Process Review
Oahu MPO MPO | Honolulu, HI | 2015
Senior Planner—Policy and Technical Assistance
Assisted with response to corrective action received during Federal Certification Review. Conducted comprehensive review
and evaluation of MPO’s current planning process to develop better understanding of how best to improve continuing,
cooperative, and comprehensive (“3C”) process among MPO, partner agencies, other departments and agencies, and
public.
2040 Long Range Transportation Plan
Ocala/Marion County TPO | Ocala, FL | 2014
Project Manager
Included enhanced approach to addressing safety through mini-application of Road Safety Audit process. Process
conducted to meet requirements of MAP-21 and identify potential performance measures for TPO use in monitoring and
assessing effectiveness of projects identified in Cost Feasible LRTP. As urbanized area was on cusp of TMA designation,
evaluated additional potentially-available federal revenues, allocated to non-capacity projects, thus increasing revenues
for multimodal projects.
9.D.4
Packet Pg. 342 Attachment: 19-7562 Tindale Oliver Proposal (9249 : Recommendation to approve the Selection Committee’s ranking for SHSP)
www.tindaleoliver.com
W.T. has served in various project management and engineering roles for Tindale
Oliver’s safety-focused projects and clients. His broad safety engineering experience
includes review of high crash spots and segments, conducting Road Safety Audits,
developing methodologies for systemic safety improvement identification, project
prioritization, and coordination/collaboration with local and state agencies. He is an
expert in Benefit: Cost and Net Present Value analysis and has significant experience in
working with all scales of safety improvements from spot maintenance
recommendations to projects performed under district Push-button and Design-build
Push-button to jointly funded Local Agency Program projects.
W.T. applies significant expertise in traffic operations and traffic design in assessing
potential operational/safety trade-offs of recommendations, including pedestrian and
bicycle facility planning and engineering, ITS/ATMS projects, traffic signal retiming, and
traffic design projects including traffic signal, ATMS, roadway marking and signing, and
work zone traffic control. He also has significant experience in traffic operational
analysis, micro simulation, and traffic studies. He serves as Tindale Oliver’s Project
Manager on FDOT Districtwide, County and City GEC and stand alone projects and
applies his management skills along a wide array of project types.
Relevant Project Experience
Safety Studies and Minor Design
FDOT District 7 | Tampa Bay, FL | Ongoing
Project Manager/Project Engineer
Provide a broad range of traffic safety/operations studies and safety program
management services. Support safety education and enforcement activities and
systemic countermeasures approaches. Prior iterations of this districtwide contract
included development of Pedestrian Safety Action Plans for three counties,
development of GIS/web-based crash data systems, support and management of the
District’s off-system safety program, and development of spot and systemic
countermeasures to improve transportation safety. As the Consultant Project Manager,
manage day-to-day operation, including programming project tasks coordinating and
prioritizing with District staff, managing on- and off-site subconsultants, and ensuring
schedules, deliverables, and expectations are met.
Safety Studies/Road Safety Audits
FDOT District 4 | Southeast Florida | Ongoing
Project Manager/Project Engineer
Conduct safety studies and road safety audits in Broward, Palm Beach, Martin, St. Lucie,
and Indian River counties to recommend short-, mid-, and long-term countermeasures
and follow-up studies. Preliminary focus has been on pedestrian and bicycle safety
issues including several “hot-spot” locations identified by FDOT Central Office.
Recommendations include signing, marking, and signalization modifications; upgrades
roadside features above and beyond FDOT standards; mid-block crossings and
pedestrian signals at locations; relocation of transit stops; deployment of innovative
improvements from the State’s Innovative Products List (IPL); ATMS upgrades; safety
improvement additions to 3R and Work Program projects.
W. T. Bowman, P.E.
Associate Director of Transportation Engineering
and Safety
Role: Support—Statistical Analysis & GIS
Office Location
Fort Lauderdale, FL
Education
BS, Industrial and Systems
Engineering, Virginia Tech
Years of Experience
17
Years with Tindale Oliver
13
Certifications
> Florida P.E. #69132 (2009)
> Georgia P.E. #040908
(2015)
> Fiber Optics for ITS
(IMSA Level 2)
> Traffic Signal Field
Technician (IMSA Level 2)
Professional Affiliations
> Institute of Transportation
Engineers (ITE)
> International Municipal
Signal Association (IMSA)
> The Florida Institute of
Consulting Engineers
(FICE)
> FES (Florida Engineering
Society)
> American Council of
Engineering Companies
(ACEC)
9.D.4
Packet Pg. 343 Attachment: 19-7562 Tindale Oliver Proposal (9249 : Recommendation to approve the Selection Committee’s ranking for SHSP)
WWW.TINDALEOLIVER.COM
W. T. Bowman, P.E.
Associate Director of Transportation Engineering and Safety
General Engineering Consultant
City of Tampa | Tampa, FL | Ongoing
Project Manager
Work with the City of Tampa on a broad range of traffic studies and analyses including development of priority list for
Capacity projects to be programmed into City’s Capital Improvement Program. Identified local road safety projects as
candidates for HSIP funding through FDOT D7. Subsequent studies reviewed benefit of studies, initial cost estimates, and
support in preparing applications to D7 for project funding.
Access Management
FDOT District 7 | Tampa Bay, FL | Ongoing
Subconsultant Project Manager
Using historical crash data, identified locations with a high incidence of crashes (angle, left-turn, etc.) that could indicate
need for modifications to access management along SHS corridors. During corridor analysis phase, provided detailed safety
analysis, particularly related to pedestrian and bicycle safety, to identify projects and strategies to supplement
modifications to corridor access and provide a safer environment for pedestrians and bicyclists. Such strategies included
consideration of sidewalk modifications, lighting improvements, median refuge, and mid-block crossings.
General Engineering Consultant
Hillsborough County | Hillsborough County, FL | Ongoing
Project Manager
Served as an on-call consultant for ad-hoc traffic engineering requests, including included design of location-specific RRFB
deployments, development of typical design plans for RRFB’s, and management and training for County’s online CDMS.
East Hillsborough Corridor Study
Hillsborough MPO| Hillsborough County, FL | 2014
Project Engineer
Corridor identified as part of county-wide safety analysis, included close coordination with FDOT to ensure
recommendations could be implemented. Identified locations for un-signalized crosswalks using Pedestrian Hybrid
Beacons, new signal at 25th Street, and signal timing improvements to provide better gaps for motorists, cyclists, and
pedestrians.
Tampa Walk-Bike Plan Phase I–IV
Hillsborough County MPO | Tampa, FL | 2010-2014
Project Manager/Project Engineer
Identify and prioritize cost-feasible bicycle and pedestrian network projects to improve access to Tampa’s three major
business centers and complete city’s overall multimodal network. A primary role was to evaluate trade-offs of various
improvement concepts such as right-of-way and utility impacts, potential operational impacts, alternate strategies and
corridors, and matching scope of project with the character of the neighborhood or location (i.e., shared lanes vs. bicycle
path).
Fletcher Avenue Complete Street Design
Hillsborough County | Tampa, FL | 2011
Project Engineer
Developed mid-block crossing traffic control strategies near University of South Florida campus with significant history of
bike/ped crashes, including determination of proper speed limit setting, evaluation of access management impacts,
preparation of design plans for 5 mid-block crossings, including Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons mounted overhead
along with pedestrian-actuated pedestrian lighting to improve crosswalk illumination.
9.D.4
Packet Pg. 344 Attachment: 19-7562 Tindale Oliver Proposal (9249 : Recommendation to approve the Selection Committee’s ranking for SHSP)
www.tindaleoliver.com
Juan has an extensive background in the public sector where he has successfully
implemented enterprise geospatial information system solutions. He has experience in
the development of applications and services using the latest geospatial technologies
to promote integration of geospatial information and applications into various business
center systems. He served as Development Lead in large-scale business system
implementations and enterprise system integration, and has experience in multi-
jurisdictional projects and inter-governmental agreements as they pertain to
technologies that promote data sharing and open systems.
Since joining Tindale Oliver in 2010, Juan has led efforts to develop enterprise/ArcGIS
Server crash data management and analysis technologies. Juan has also supported
Tindale Oliver’s safety engineering and program management staff for FDOT District 7
Safety Studies and Minor Design to develop web-based GIS safety project tracking
interfaces. Additionally he has worked with Tindale Oliver’s transit team to develop a
transit system GIS portal concept and provide technical advice to transit agencies for
integration of farebox, AVL, and stop asset systems to facilitate NTD reporting and has
developed mobile data collection applications for tablet PCs/smart phones that are
integrated with Web-based GIS analysis and reporting applications.
Representative Projects
Bicycle/Pedestrian Access to Transit
FDOT District 7 | Tampa Bay, FL | Ongoing
Lead Developer
Designed and developed SharePoint site that allowed for multi-jurisdictional access to
project related documents and incorporated a mapping interface that displayed
locations of field reviews and engineering studies. This allowed participants to quickly
access information and identify and evaluate potential improvements.
Safety Studies and Minor Design
FDOT District 7 | Tampa Bay, FL | Ongoing
Lead Developer
Developed a web portal for staff to upload and maintain project data. Project data
includes safety studies, traffic counts, service requests, as well as integration into a web
based crash data system. Staff can analyze and report on the information stored in the
project database. This portal supports safety education and enforcement activities and
systemic countermeasures approaches.
Transit Monitoring Tools
Maryland Transit Authority | Baltimore, MD | 2011
Lead Developer
Developed a set of mobile and web-based tools to assist management in the monitoring
of transit routes that are effective for both bus and rail modes. Developed survey
application tools on cellular phones for monitors to better assess operating conditions
in the field. Developed a GIS, web-based portal for management to track what surveyors
were entering out in the field.
Juan Butler, GISP
Senior Programmer
Role: Task Lead—Statistical Analysis & GIS
Office Location
Tampa, FL
Education
BA, Geography/GIS, University
of Florida (1996)
Years of Experience
18
Years with Tindale Oliver
8
Professional Affiliations
Urban and Regional Information
Systems Association—Florida
Chapter (FL-URISA)
Certifications
GISP #91751
Technical Skills
ArcGIS Server, ArcGIS
Server, ArcGIS Desktop,
ArcSDE
.NET Framework (C#),
ASP.NET (C#), WCF, VB.NET,
MVC, Web Services
Silverlight, AJAX.NET
Java
Coldfusion
HTML, XML, JavaScript,
JQuery, Visual Basic
Oracle Database
Administration with Oracle
Spatial
Crystal Reports and Crystal
Enterprise
SQL Server with SQL Spatial
XML/XSL/AJAX
Microsoft IIS, Apache/
Tomcat
Google API
Android Mobile
Development
9.D.4
Packet Pg. 345 Attachment: 19-7562 Tindale Oliver Proposal (9249 : Recommendation to approve the Selection Committee’s ranking for SHSP)
www.tindaleoliver.com
Juan Butler, GISP
Senior Programmer
Web-Based Crash Data Management Systems
For various public agencies including Pinellas, Hillsborough, Collier, Pasco, Lee, Highland, Sarasota counties, FL | Ongoing
Lead Developer, Database Administrator
Developed Web-based Crash Data Management System for various public sector clients that allows agencies to analyze
traffic crashes in their jurisdiction. The system leverages data sources from different organizations and consolidated them
into a single, enterprise data model. Geographic Information Systems (GIS) is used to provide the mapping and spatial
analysis needed by users.
Web-Based Crash Management/Analysis System
FDOT District 2 | Various Counties, FL | Ongoing
Lead Developer
Developed a Web-based Crash Data Management System for FDOT District 2. Crash data were imported from FDOT crash
data system into a fully functional, enterprise GIS database so users can access information from a standard web browser.
Application used GIS to provide mapping, reporting, and analysis needed by users. Developed series of tools that allowed
staff to analyze crashes and view trends that occurred throughout the state road network.
GIS Web Portal
City of Treasure Island | Treasure Island, FL | 2011
Lead Developer
Developed a Web-based portal application and tools to assist City staff, providing a mechanism for employees to view GIS
data being captured by the GIS group. Application enables users to link key department files to features within a map,
including videos, pictures, and plans.
Web-Based Crash Management and Studies Tracking
FDOT District 4 | Various Counties, FL | Ongoing
Lead Developer
Developed a Web-based Crash Data and Project Tracking System for District 4 FDOT so users can access information from a
standard web browser via the Crash Data Management web application that uses GIS to provide the mapping, reporting,
and analysis needed by users in the District. Integrated Studies Tracking module into the system that allowed staff to enter
and maintain studies in the District. Staff could monitor status and provide responses and recommendations to
participating agencies. Developed automated reporting and messaging to assist with the multi-agency coordination of
projects.
9.D.4
Packet Pg. 346 Attachment: 19-7562 Tindale Oliver Proposal (9249 : Recommendation to approve the Selection Committee’s ranking for SHSP)
www.tindaleoliver.com
Buse is a Transportation Engineer with Tindale Oliver’s Transportation Engineering and
Safety Group, assisting with the Safety Studies and Minor Design Contract for FDOT 7,
Safety Studies/Road Safety Audits for FDOT District 4, and with the maintenance of Web-
based Crash Data Management Systems (WebCDMS) for several counties throughout
Florida. Buse’s major strengths include excellent communication and organizational skills,
as well as attention to detail. She is experienced with AutoCAD, Geographic Information
Systems (GIS), MATLAB, MathCAD and Microsoft Office software.
Project Experience
Safety Studies and Minor Design
FDOT District 7 | Tampa Bay, FL | Ongoing
Engineering Technician
Provide a broad range of traffic safety/operations studies and safety program management
services. Support safety education and enforcement activities and systemic
countermeasures approaches. Prior iterations of this districtwide contract included
development of Pedestrian Safety Action Plans for three counties, development of GIS/web
-based crash data systems, support and management of the District’s off-system safety
program, and development of spot and systemic countermeasures to improve
transportation safety. As the Consultant Project Manager, manage day-to-day operation,
including programming project tasks coordinating and prioritizing with District staff,
managing on- and off-site subconsultants, and ensuring schedules, deliverables, and
expectations are met.
Safety Studies/Road Safety Audits
FDOT District 4 | Southeast Florida | Ongoing
Engineering Technician
Conduct safety studies and road safety audits in Broward, Palm Beach, Martin, St. Lucie,
and Indian River counties to recommend short-, mid-, and long-term countermeasures and
follow-up studies. Preliminary focus has been on pedestrian and bicycle safety issues
including several “hot-spot” locations identified by FDOT Central Office.
Recommendations include signing, marking, and signalization modifications; upgrades
roadside features above and beyond FDOT standards; mid-block crossings and pedestrian
signals at locations; relocation of transit stops; deployment of innovative improvements
from the State’s Innovative Products List (IPL); ATMS upgrades; safety improvement
additions to 3R and Work Program projects.
Web-Based Crash Data Management Systems
For various public agencies including Pinellas, Hillsborough, Collier, Pasco, Lee, Highland,
Sarasota counties, FL | Ongoing
Maintenance Support
Developed Web-based Crash Data Management System for various public sector clients
that allows agencies to analyze traffic crashes in their jurisdiction. The system leverages
data sources from different organizations and consolidated them into a single, enterprise
data model. Geographic Information Systems (GIS) is used to provide the mapping and
spatial analysis needed by users.
Buse Cengiz
Transportation Engineer
Role: Support—Statistical Analysis & GIS
Office Location
Tampa, FL
Education
BSCE, Civil Engineering,
University of Central
Florida (2019)
Years of Experience
2
Years with Tindale
Oliver
2
9.D.4
Packet Pg. 347 Attachment: 19-7562 Tindale Oliver Proposal (9249 : Recommendation to approve the Selection Committee’s ranking for SHSP)
www.tindaleoliver.com
Throughout his professional consulting career, Mr. Cursey has been responsible for
managing and providing technical support for transportation planning projects,
including all modes of travel. His expertise includes all aspects of public sector
planning, primarily freight and goods movement, long-range transportation planning,
sub-area studies, corridor studies, travel demand modeling, bicycle and pedestrian
planning, transit studies, and roadway characteristics inventory.
Project Experience
2045 Long Range Transportation Plan
Pasco County MPO | New Port Richey, FL | 2018-Ongoing
Project Manager
This project is the five-year update of the Mobility 2040 LRTP. Tindale Oliver is
responsible for coordinating and executing the full development of the 2045 LRTP.
Tasks include socio-economic data development, scenario planning, cost and revenue
analysis, public engagement, develop of the needs plan, and development of the cost
affordable plan. Innovative and key aspects of plan development include incorporation
of all modes of travel, consideration of new ACES technology elements (autonomous,
connected, electric, shared vehicles), innovative public engagement, and incorporation
of Vision 54/56 recommendations.
University Area and Wesley Chapel Intermodal Center Studies
FDOT District 7 | Tampa, FL | 2017—Ongoing
Project Manager
The purpose of these studies is to identify a preferred site and conceptual plan for
intermodal centers in the University Area of Tampa and Wesley Chapel area of Pasco
County. An intermodal center is a hub or facility that serves as a centralized location for
multiple modes of transportation. In this case, the centers are anticipated to serve
transit, bicycle, pedestrians, taxis and other on-demand ride services (e.g., Uber, Lyft,
etc.), and intercity bus service, among others. The intermodal centers will serve as
connections between existing and future local and regional transportation services.
City of Port Richey 2018 Traffic Analysis and Subarea Study
City of Port Richey | Port Richey, FL | 2018
Principal-In-Charge/Project Manager
This project involved assessing the impact of new and planned projects on the
transportation infrastructure in the gulf residential and commercial subarea of Port
Richey. Activities included data collection, an existing conditions analysis, a traffic
impact analysis , a commercial parking analysis and a subarea needs assessments.
Recommendations included, roadway and pedestrian improvements and way-finding
signage.
Robert E. Cursey, Jr., AICP
Principal/Director of Metropolitan Transportation
Planning
Role: Quality Assurance/Control
Office Location
Tampa, FL
Education
MA, Geography, Georgia
State University (1993)
BS, Geosciences, University
of Tennessee (1988)
Years of Experience
29
Years with Tindale Oliver
3
Certifications
AICP # 011328
Professional Affiliations
American Institute of
Certified Planners (AICP)
American Planning
Association (APA)
Tampa Bay Transportation
Applications Group (TB-TAG)
Board Member
9.D.4
Packet Pg. 348 Attachment: 19-7562 Tindale Oliver Proposal (9249 : Recommendation to approve the Selection Committee’s ranking for SHSP)
www.tindaleoliver.com
Robert E. Cursey, Jr., AICP
Principal/Director of Metropolitan Transportation Planning
SR 5/US 1/Biscayne Boulevard Corridor Study
FDOT District 6 | Miami, FL | 2015-2018
Deputy Project Manager
Through public engagement and technical analysis, identify short- and mid-term improvements to enhance mobility and
livability along SR 5/US1 from SE 8 St to the Miami/Broward County Line. Improvements along one of the busiest
transportation corridor are expected to include “premium bus” treatments, multimodal, network enhancements, and
intersection safety projects.
Pasco County Corridor Preservation Update
Pasco County | Pasco County, FL | 2016-2017
Project Manager
Tindale Oliver completed an update to the Pasco County Corridor Preservation Plan, which was originally developed a
decade ago by Tindale Oliver. With changes over time, the corridor preservation tables and maps needed to be reviewed
and updated to reflect changes that occurred since the development of the original plan. Included in the update was a
review and modifications to the typical roadway cross sections which determined how much right-of-way needed to be
reserved for future use.
City of Sunrise Area-wide Transportation Needs Assessment
FDOT District 4 | Broward County, FL | 2016—2017
Project Manager
Evaluated current and future transportation characteristics, determined multimodal improvement needs, evaluated
transportation network from multimodal perspective, identified feasible and acceptable improvements to address
anticipated growth and development and related travel demand. Provided professional transportation planning and
engineering services, collection and analysis of land use, transportation, and socio-economic related data.
2040 LRTP Freight Investment Program*
Hillsborough MPO | Tampa, FL | 2014
Principal-in-Charge
Developed the initial cost basis of freight needs for the first five years of the 2040 LRTP. Based on the initial cost, projected
funding investment boxes were developed for the remaining 20-years of the plan.
Northwest Florida Regional Freight Plan*
Florida-Alabama TPO | Pensacola, FL | 2009-2010
Project Manager
Developed a regional freight plan for northwest Florida that includes the counties of Bay, Escambia, Okaloosa, Santa Rosa,
Walton and Washington. The objective was to define the regional freight corridors (road and rail), identify regional freight
activity centers, locate intersections and road segments that reduce freight movement efficiency, determine the primary
goods and their quantities being shipped from and into the region, and to develop a recommend plan of action to ensure
efficient freight movement.
*Work performed prior to joining Tindale Oliver
9.D.4
Packet Pg. 349 Attachment: 19-7562 Tindale Oliver Proposal (9249 : Recommendation to approve the Selection Committee’s ranking for SHSP)
www.tindaleoliver.com
Patrick is a Planner and GIS/Data Analyst with Tindale Oliver. A background in human
geography, geographic information systems, spatial analysis and data management
provides expertise in visualizing and analyzing data for a wide array of projects. He has
experience and expertise in community planning and design and public finance projects
among various other transportation related projects that Tindale Oliver has contracted
on.
Project Experience
Pinellas Park Comprehensive Plan and Land Development Code Update
City of Pinellas Park | Pinellas Park, FL | Ongoing
Planner/GIS Analyst
Updating City’s Comprehensive Plan and Land Development Code to include a more
holistic approach to redevelopment, economic development, and multimodal
transportation. In addition to the restructuring and reimagining of the Comprehensive
Plan, the Land Development Code is also being reviewed and refreshed to more closely
align the standards with the updated Comprehensive Plan.
Concord 2030 Land Use Plan
City of Concord | Concord, NC | 2017-2018
Planner/GIS Analyst
Updated and reimagined Land Use Plan (LUP) for second largest city in Charlotte
Metropolitan Area. Goals included engaging community in planning process in variety of
ways, refocusing LUP to address future growth challenges, simplifying plan structure to
make it more accessible to the public and decision-makers. Included existing conditions
assessment, updating data and analysis, developing new growth vision, and simplifying
future land use map and categories.
Uptown Urban Village Land Use Amendment and Form Based Code Master Plan
City of Fort Lauderdale Traffic and Transportation , BCC Engineering, Inc.|
Fort Lauderdale, FL | Ongoing
Planner/GIS Analyst
Established a planning framework by amending land uses to a mixed-use designation
that supports multi-modal development. Authored a form based code to guide
development toward creating a thriving mixed-use district. Plan objectives included
advancing ULI recommendations, community engagement, enhancing assets,
improvements to bicycle/pedestrian and parks/open space infrastructure, evaluating
Uptown brand to ensure strong sense of place, recommending codes to support the
vision, predicting growth, and developing next steps to support the vision.
Patrick Dougherty
Planner/GIS Analyst
Role: Support—Statistical Analysis & GIS
Office Location
Tampa, FL
Education
> Masters of Urban and
Regional Planning, The
University of South Florida
(2016)
> BS, Human Geography/GIS,
The Pennsylvania State
University (2014)
Years of Experience
4
Years with Tindale Oliver
4
Professional Affiliations
American Planning Association
(APA)
9.D.4
Packet Pg. 350 Attachment: 19-7562 Tindale Oliver Proposal (9249 : Recommendation to approve the Selection Committee’s ranking for SHSP)
www.tindaleoliver.com
Patrick Dougherty
Planner/GIS Analyst
Neighborhood Planning
City of Port St. Lucie | Port St. Lucie, FL | 2014-2017
Planner/GIS Analyst
Developed six Neighborhood Plans to achieve the City’s strategic goals of having stable neighborhoods, quality housing,
diverse economy, mobility choices, and enhanced leisure opportunities. Plans included a neighborhood involvement
strategy composed of interactive workshops, surveys, and focus group meetings for each planning area. Project tasks for
plans included data collection and analysis, existing conditions analysis, reviewing of existing documents, neighborhood
area fieldwork, framework development, and branding to produce a final community plan and presentation.
SR 7 Multimodal Improvements Corridor Study
Broward MPO | Broward County, FL | 2016
Planner/GIS Analyst
Identified multimodal improvements to manage congestion and mitigate safety issues for transit users including; motorists,
bicyclists, pedestrians, and passengers along the SR 7 corridor.
Citywide Trails Master Plan
City of Saint Cloud | St. Cloud, FL | 2016
Planner/GIS Analyst
Evaluated existing, planned, and potential trails for connectivity. Identified improvements to current trails, recommended
locations for additional pedestrian/trail facilities to serve existing population and accommodate growth. Prepared
prioritized and phased project list based on needs, demand, feasibility, funding, and schedules. Solicited public
involvement through workshops, surveys, and outreach to local, county, state, and federal agencies, special interest
groups, and community organizations.
East Main Street Strategic Action Plan
City of Lakeland | Lakeland, FL | 2015
Planner/GIS Analyst
Completed focused small area study for East Main Street District to identify potential economic development, urban design,
and transportation strategies to strengthen existing business, attract industry, and ensure the district's future as an
important urban employment center. Proposed incentives to encourage business growth and incubation. Presented urban
design and transportation recommendations to improve access, encourage development, and create a sense of place.
Encouraged partnerships to create opportunities for education and entrepreneurship.
Fiscal Sustainability Study
Orange County | Orange County, FL | 2015
Planner/GIS Analyst
Provided professional services to manage project kickoff, meetings, conference calls, and coordination of minutes and
deliverables. Reviewed and documented best practices of 20 state and national municipalities in consideration of
demographics, capital and operating cost methodology, level of service, growth management and land use policies, cost
and revenues dependent upon location, density and type. Lessons learned were documented and analyzed to form
recommendations for evaluation models and development.
9.D.4
Packet Pg. 351 Attachment: 19-7562 Tindale Oliver Proposal (9249 : Recommendation to approve the Selection Committee’s ranking for SHSP)
www.tindaleoliver.com
George offers extensive expertise in the enforcement of traffic laws, traffic engineering
studies, traffic safety education to public schools, traffic crash/homicide investigations,
conducting and establishing directed patrols for traffic hazardous intersections, and
instructing bicycle and pedestrian safety courses. He has been actively involved with the
Florida Department of Transportation and local government agencies to create
educational materials regarding local traffic policy and procedures, pedestrian/bicycle
statutes, and overall safety.
George is currently employed with the City of Largo Police Department, and assists
Tindale-Oliver & Associates with safety enforcement as the need arises. His street
knowledge is extremely beneficial to the Tindale Oliver team in deciphering crash
reports or implementing safety regulations.
Representative Projects
FDOT District 7, Road Safety Audit, East Bay Dr (SR686) (2013)
FDOT District 7, Teen RSA at All Children's Hospital instructing selected students on
how to perform RSA's. (2013)
FDOT District 7,St Petersburg RSA's conducted at: 4 Street S and 5 Ave S, (2013)
4 Street S and 6 Ave S
4 Street N and 46 Ave N
FDOT District 7, developed the lesson plan for D-7 Law Enforcement Pedestrian
Enforcement training. This included best practices, state statutes governing
pedestrian laws and setting up pedestrian crosswalk enforcement details at
crosswalks. (2013)
FDOT District 7, developed pedestrian and bicycle engineering changes as a result
of recent bicycle and pedestrian conflicts along the Memorial Causeway in
Clearwater. These crashes resulted in fatal crashes along the corridor. The
implemented changes included pavement markings, increased education followed
enforcement of bicycle regulations by the local authorities. (2013)
FDOT District 7, assisted in developing a Bicycle safety brochure for D-7 to include
state statutes governing bicycle regulations and developing tip cards for law
enforcement distribution in their bicycle enforcement campaign. (2013)
FDOT District 7, worked as the law enforcement specialist to assist D-7with RSA's
on two Tampa Bay Bridges experiencing street racing along the Courtney Campbell
Causeway and the Gandy Bridge. These RSA's brought together the law
enforcement authorities in various jurisdictions and enforcement strategies were
recommended. (2013)
George Edmiston (Sgt.)
Safety Enforcement Specialist
Project Role: Safety Specialist
Office Location
Tampa, FL
Education
AA, Criminology
Years of Experience
28
Years with Tindale Oliver
5
Certifications
See page 2
Awards
MADD's 2012 Exceptional
Achievements Award,
RID's Traffic Unit of the Year
for Pinellas County in 2010
and 2012, Clearwater Bar
Assn. Allen L. Moore
Gold Badge Award recipient
2009, VIP's supervisor
recognition 2006 and 2007,
Life Savings Award 2005,
Medal of Valor Award 2003,
DUI Enforcement Officer
Award (RID Tampa Bay)
1996 and 1997
Distinguished Service Medal
1992
9.D.4
Packet Pg. 352 Attachment: 19-7562 Tindale Oliver Proposal (9249 : Recommendation to approve the Selection Committee’s ranking for SHSP)
www.tindaleoliver.com
George Edmiston (Sgt.)
Safety Enforcement Specialist
Licenses and Certificates
Florida State Certified Law Enforcement Officer (Basic Recruit Academy 1990)
Intoxilyzer / Breath Test Operator/ PBT Operator
Speed Measurement Device / Radar and Laser Operator
Command Vehicle Operator
Investigative Interviews (Interview and Interrogation)
Police Driving Instructor
Hostage Negotiator - Tactical Response Team (T.A.C.)
Evidence Technician Florida State certified Instructor / FDLE Police Instructor (General Topics)
Certified School Crossing Guard Trainer
Child Passenger Safety Seat Technician
Police Bicycle Officer Certified
Traffic Homicide Investigator/ Advanced Traffic Homicide
Traffic Crash reconstructionist
Pedestrian and Bicycle Advanced Crash reconstruction
Instructor for Incident Response to Terroristic Bombing incidents
Firearms Instructor
FATS Instructor
Traffic Engineering for Law Enforcement Professionals
Management Team Building, University of South Florida, 2002
9.D.4
Packet Pg. 353 Attachment: 19-7562 Tindale Oliver Proposal (9249 : Recommendation to approve the Selection Committee’s ranking for SHSP)
www.tindaleoliver.com
Laura’s areas of expertise include graphic design, page and publication layout, web
development and design, and multimedia software. On a daily basis, she develops and
contributes to the visual design of reports, proposals, presentations, public workshops
materials, project websites, brochures, signage, etc. Her skills are essential to the public
involvement activities required on Tindale Oliver projects through the creation of
websites, email blasts, surveys, flyers, infographics, and display boards, making them
concise and easy to read. Her creative flair and expertise enhance all promotional
collateral, and her ability to develop and conduct concepts from inception to completion
are integral to Tindale Oliver’s communications with clients, colleagues, government
officials, and the public.
Project Experience
FDOT D7 Support
FDOT District 7 | Tampa Bay, FL | Ongoing
Lead Graphics/Web Designer
Provide graphic and web design support on several ongoing FDOT D7 contracts,
including:
> Special Events – designed and produced all conference materials (programs, email
campaigns, display boards, handouts) for Safety Summit and CTST Statewide
Coalition Meeting.
> Public Outreach – developed and produced display boards showing specific
renderings representing upcoming improvements during public outreach workshops
for SR60/Kennedy Boulevard and Jackson Street Resurfacing Project and US 98 and
Citrus Way Intersection Improvements.
> FDOT D7 Community Traffic Safety Teams (CTST) – developed new brand and
identity design for all D7 Community Traffic Safety Teams, including design of new
logo, letterhead, email blast and PowerPoint templates. Designed posters for
Lifesaver Conferences since 2009.
> Educational Materials – designed Safety Neighborhood educational tip card
focusing on speeding through neighborhoods and High-Intensity Activated
Crosswalk (HAWK) on Fletcher Avenue; developed door hanger version; created and
designed sidewalk stencils focused on bicyclist and pedestrian safety.
> Safety Campaigns – annually design Recipes for the Road booklets, a collection of
non-alcoholic drinks from restaurants in Tampa Bay area, a campaign that has run
for 10 years; Move Over, It’s the Law – designed campaign educating public on
Florida Statutes, shared on social media. Teen RSA Guides – designed and produced
student and teacher guides for Teen Roadways Safety Advocates, national program
focused on empowering youth and helping them become teen roadway safety
advocates.
> Development and Maintenance of Websites – US 98 and Citrus Way Intersection
Improvements (SharePoint 2013), SR60/Kennedy Boulevard and Jackson Street
Resurfacing Project (SharePoint 2013), US 19 Pedestrian & Bicycle Safety Access to
Transit Corridor Study (SharePoint 2013), and Community Traffic Safety Team
Website (SharePoint 2013).
Laura Molennor
Senior Graphics/Web Designer
Role: Public Engagement Support
Office Location
Tampa, FL
Education
> BFA, Graphic Design,
International Academy
of Design and
Technology–Tampa
(2007)
> AS, Graphic Design,
International Academy
of Design and
Technology–Tampa
(2005)
Years of Experience
12
Years with Tindale Oliver
11
Professional Affiliations
AIGA Tampa Bay
Technical Skills
> Adobe Creative Suite
(Print and Web)
> HTML, CSS, and
JavaScript
> SharePoint 2013
> WordPress
9.D.4
Packet Pg. 354 Attachment: 19-7562 Tindale Oliver Proposal (9249 : Recommendation to approve the Selection Committee’s ranking for SHSP)
www.tindaleoliver.com
Laura Molennor
Senior Graphics/Web Designer
Commuter Services Program
FDOT D1 | Polk County, FL | Ongoing
Lead Web Designer/Developer
Developed and designed new website launched in late August 2015 in WordPress that allows Commuter Services staff to
easily make edits/changes and provided staff training.
Las Olas Traffic and Safety Construction Improvements Project (CIP)
City of Fort Lauderdale | Fort Lauderdale, FL | Ongoing
Lead Graphic Designer/Web Designer
Worked with City’s Public Information Office in design of promotional materials (door hangers and business cards) to
distribute among business and home owners in SE 15th Avenue between Broward Boulevard and Las Olas Boulevard about
upcoming construction improvements in area. Developed website using WordPress using responsive design, making it easy
to view on any mobile device. Website provides current information to public and way to connect/contact with City if
concerns arises.
VISION 54/56 Study, Phase I
Pasco County MPO | Pasco County, FL | Ongoing
Lead Graphic Designer/Web Designer
Continuation of MOBILITY 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan. Worked with Pasco County MPO in development of unique
brand but still keeping essence of LRTP. Designed and developed project website using HTML5, designed templates for
reports, documents, boards for public workshops, presentations, stylized maps, email campaigns.
Transit Development Plan
Ocala/Marion TPO/SunTran | Marion County, FL | 2017
Lead Graphic Designer/Web Designer
Worked with Ocala/Marion TPO in design and development of unique brand for the upcoming Transit Development Plan.
Brand included design of document templates, email campaigns, online surveys, a project website. Website developed
using WordPress using responsive design making it easy to view on any mobile device. Website provides current
information to public about upcoming workshops.
SR7 Multimodal Improvements Corridor Study
Broward County MPO | Fort Lauderdale, FL | 2016
Lead Graphic Designer/Web Designer
Worked directly with Broward MPO IT consultants to develop and maintain project website for SR7 Multimodal
Improvements Corridor Study. Designed unique brand to use during duration of project, including documents and reports
templates, presentations, project business card, email blast campaigns.
MOBILITY 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan
Pasco County MPO | Tampa Bay, FL | 2015
Lead Graphic Designer/Web Designer
Used SharePoint 2013 to design, develop, and maintain Mobility 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan project website.
Developed unique brand design materials for reports, documents, public workshops, presentations, stylized maps, email
campaigns.
9.D.4
Packet Pg. 355 Attachment: 19-7562 Tindale Oliver Proposal (9249 : Recommendation to approve the Selection Committee’s ranking for SHSP)
www.tindaleoliver.com
Andrea has more than 14 years of experience in marketing for the AEC (Architecture-
Engineering-Construction) industry, particularly for construction management, design-
build, geotechnical engineering, and transportation planning and engineering. Public
involvement experience includes social media and internet marketing campaigns for
numerous city, county, and state agencies. Campaign elements include online surveys
and polls, e-mail newsletters and announcements, text message campaigns, and social
media account creation and maintenance. Marketing and communications experience
includes marketing research and assessment, social media campaigns, proposal and
presentation coordination, tradeshow and event planning, marketing database
creation/maintenance, project lead generation, marketing plan development and
strategy, and media relations.
Andrea currently serves on the Digital Committee for the Tampa Bay Chapter of the
Public Relations Society of America and was the 2013 recipient of the PRSA Tampa Bay
President’s Award. Previously, she was co-director of the Society for Marketing
Professional Services’ Membership Committee.
Representative Projects - Tindale Oliver (9/2011-Present)
FDOT D7 Support
FDOT District 7 | Tampa Bay, FL | Ongoing
Marketing & Communications Coordinator
Provide marketing and communications support on multiple ongoing FDOT District7
contracts, including:
> Community Traffic Safety Teams (CTST) communications – meeting email blasts,
special announcement email blasts, website administration, monthly agendas and
meeting minutes, email list creation and maintenance
> Local Agency Traffic Safety Academy, Series 1, 2, and 3 – online event registration,
email blast series
> 4th, 5th, 6th, and 7th Annual D7 Local Agency Safety Summits – online event
registration, email blasts
> Open Streets St. Pete – creation/maintenance of social media accounts, email
blasts, mailing lists, website administration, press releases
> 2014 and 2015 Cyclovia Tampa Bay – creation/maintenance of social media
accounts, email blasts, mailing lists, website administration
> Assessment location online surveys
> Bike/Walk Tampa Bay Coalition – miscellaneous communications
> Recipes for the Road – Facebook page creation and maintenance
Andrea Sauvageot
Communications & Research Coordinator
Role: Public Engagement Support
Office Location
Tampa, FL
Education
> MA, Communication,
Southern New Hampshire
University (2017)
> BS, Journalism,
University of Florida
(1994)
> Social Marketing for
Transportation,
University of South
Florida (CUTR)
> Desktop Publishing
Certificate, University of
South Florida
> Webmaster Certificate—
Design, St. Petersburg
College
Years of Experience
24
Years with Tindale Oliver
7
Professional Affiliations
Public Relations Society of
America (PRSA) — Tampa Bay
Chapter, Website/Job Board
Committee Chair
9.D.4
Packet Pg. 356 Attachment: 19-7562 Tindale Oliver Proposal (9249 : Recommendation to approve the Selection Committee’s ranking for SHSP)
www.tindaleoliver.com
Andrea Sauvageot
Communications & Research Coordinator
Other FDOT District Support: Email Blasts/Surveys/Social Media
FDOT | Florida | Ongoing
Marketing & Communications Coordinator
Provide marketing and communications support on multiple ongoing FDOT contracts, including:
> D1 Commuter Services – email blast series for AAA Tow to Go, eZTrack, Try Transit series, information updates, email
lists
> D5 2nd Annual Community Planning Workshops – email blast series
> D5 US 441 Corridor Study – community survey
> D5 US 441 Corridor Study – public meeting email blast
> Central Office Accessing Transit: Bus Facility Design Handbook Training Course and Updates – email blasts and online
event registration
City/County/Transit Agency Email Blast/Survey/Social Media Experience
Provided marketing and communications coordination and support for agency contracts, including:
> SunTran 2018–2027 TDP email blast series, online surveys, robodial campaign, Facebook and Twitter campaigns,
Facebook ad campaign
> Lake County Parks, Recreation & Trails Community survey
> Best Friend Express Rider survey
> Concord Open House questionnaire, Land Use survey
> Casselberry – Parks, Recreation, Pathways & Open Spaces Community survey
> City of Fort Lauderdale Transit Master Plan Public survey
> Port St. Lucie Community Conversation/Neighborhood Planning Workshops Community questionnaire
> Emerald Coast Rider Public Transit survey
> Escambia County Area Transit 10-Year Transit Needs survey and Facebook maintenance
> LeeTran DBE Program Needs Assessment survey
> Miami-Dade Transit Development Plan (MDT10Ahead) survey (English, Spanish & Creole)
> Broward MPO SR 7 email blast series, text message campaign, and General User & Field surveys
> Hollywood Pines Corridor Project Visioning Workshops survey, project e-newsletter and email blast series
> Broward County Transit Connector survey
> SFRTA survey and email blast series
> Ocala/Marion County TPO 2040 LRTP email blast series and visioning survey
> Collier Area Transit Development Plan visioning survey (English and Spanish)
> Miami-Dade Transit Development Plan (MDT10Ahead) survey (English, Spanish & Creole)
> Charlotte County Transit Development Plan survey
> Access Pasco, PCPT 10-Year Transition Plan Facebook page and Twitter account creation/maintenance
> Volusia Transit Connector Study, DeBary Sunrail Station origin/destination survey, purpose/needs statement survey
> Hernando/Citrus MPO Consensus Workshops survey, email blast, robocall campaign
> Hernando/Citrus LRTP Freight & Goods Movement project survey, cost affordable survey
> City of Lakewood (WA) Community Vision Plan survey (English, Spanish & Korean)
> Sanford Sunrail Station survey
9.D.4
Packet Pg. 357 Attachment: 19-7562 Tindale Oliver Proposal (9249 : Recommendation to approve the Selection Committee’s ranking for SHSP)
www.tindaleoliver.com
Gary’s career began in 1974, when he worked for the Prince George’s County (Maryland)
Department of Public Works, Bureau of Transportation Engineering. Prince George’s
County is located adjacent to Washington D.C. His duties included performing all types
of traffic studies (Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis, Multi–way STOP Justification, Vehicle
Spot Speed, Origin /Destination, and Vehicle Turning Movement Counts) and
investigating requests for traffic control devices. He worked for Prince George’s County
for seven years until 1981 and left to relocate to Florida.
In 1981, he started work with the Hillsborough County Department of Public Works,
Traffic Engineering Section. During his time with Hillsborough County he has
supervised several different Traffic Engineering Teams: Traffic Studies, Data Collection,
Field Investigations, School Safety Program, Residential Traffic Calming Program,
Residential Street Lighting, and the Bicycle and Pedestrian Program. He retired from
Hillsborough County in May 2012, after working 31 years.
Representative Projects
Traffic Calming
Hillsborough County Residential Traffic Calming Program (1987)
Gary authored the first complete Residential Traffic Calming Program in the Tampa Bay
Area and one of the first in the State of Florida. The program included a written
procedure for citizens wanting to obtain traffic control devices on a public street to help
reduce vehicle speeds and volumes. He created a written criteria for each available
traffic calming measure (i.e. speed humps) which listed conditions and study results
that need to exist, in order to justify their installation. In 1992, the “American City and
County” magazine awarded his Hillsborough County program First Place in the Traffic /
Public Transit category.
School Zone Safety
Hillsborough County School Zone Safety Program (2006)
In 2003, as Manager of the School Safety Program, Gary put an emphasis on student
safety. A School Zone was installed adjacent to every school (Public Elementary, Middle
and High School, Charter Schools and Private Schools) located on a County maintained
road. The Hillsborough School District is the eighth largest school district in the United
States. The Board of County Commissioners provided funding for all Signs and
Markings, and 40% of the needed Flashing Beacons. Gary partnered with the Florida
Department of Transportation, District 7 Office, Safe Routes to School Program, and
obtained funding for the remaining 60% of flashing beacons. All of the installed Flashing
Beacons are Solar Powered for energy savings. In 2007, the Project was completed and
today all schools in Hillsborough County have School Zones with Flashing School
Beacons. In 2008, the Florida Coalition of Community Traffic Safety Teams recognized
his School Zone Safety Program as a Best Practice for the State.
Gary Tait
School Safety Specialist
Role: Support—Recommendations
Office Location
Tampa, FL
Years of Experience
45
Years with Tindale Oliver
6
Appointments
State of Florida Strategic
Highway Safety Plan
Leadership Steering
Committee
State of Florida Safe Routes
to School Task Force
State of Florida Teen
Driving Task Force
State of Florida Aggressive
Driving Task Force
State of Florida Motorcycle
Safety Coalition
Professional Affiliations
Institute of Transportation
Engineers (ITE)
Association of Pedestrian
and Bicycle Professionals
(apbp)
Awards/Recognitions
2007 - Awarded the Florida
Traffic Safety Community
Member of the Year
2012 - Received a
Proclamation from the
Hillsborough School District
School Board
2015 Davis Productivity
Award for Teen Traffic
Safety Education
presentation
9.D.4
Packet Pg. 358 Attachment: 19-7562 Tindale Oliver Proposal (9249 : Recommendation to approve the Selection Committee’s ranking for SHSP)
www.tindaleoliver.com
Gary Tait
School Safety Specialist
Served on the following Local Traffic Safety Committees
Hillsborough County Community Traffic Safety Team (20 years)
Hillsborough County MPO Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee
Hillsborough County Pedestrian Safety Action Plan, County Project Mgr.
Hillsborough County Bicycle Safety Action Plan, County Project Mgr.
Hillsborough County Road Safety Audit Team
Hillsborough County School Zone Safety Audit Team Leader
Safe Kids Coalition of Tampa, Advisory Board
Hillsborough School District School Safety Committee
Awards and Recognitions
1987 - Authored the first complete Traffic Calming Program in Tampa Bay for Hillsborough County.
1992 - ”American City and County” magazine awarded his Traffic Calming Program First Place for new Traffic initiative.
2003 - Recognized by the Hillsborough School District Chief Facilities Officer, for his hard work and dedication to
Student Safety, calling it going the extra mile
2006 - He was nominated by the Florida Association of County Engineers and Road Superintendents (FACERS) for the
Florida Public Works Employee of the Year
2007 - At the Florida Law Enforcement Challenge, he was awarded a trophy as the Traffic Safety Community Member of
the Year, by the Florida Department of Transportation Safety Office
2011 - Received the Davis Productivity Award of Distinction, as a member of the Hillsborough County School Road
Safety Assessment Team
2011 - Received the Davis Productivity Award of Distinction, as a member of the Hillsborough County Pedestrian
Safety Action Plan
2012 - Received the Davis Productivity Award of Distinction, as a member of the Hillsborough County Bicycle Safety
Action Plan
2012 - At their May 22, School Board meeting, Gary received praise from the Hillsborough School Board, by receiving a
Proclamation, recognizing his outstanding efforts in keeping students safe throughout his career
9.D.4
Packet Pg. 359 Attachment: 19-7562 Tindale Oliver Proposal (9249 : Recommendation to approve the Selection Committee’s ranking for SHSP)
www.tindaleoliver.com
After a successful and productive 39-year career with the Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA), Rudy is now providing guidance, technical assistance, and
training to state and local agencies (planning, engineering, enforcement, education,
and emergency services) to further enhance their transportation programs including the
conducting pedestrian, bicycle, and ADA training and developing and implementing
Pedestrian Safety Action Plans, Bicycle Safety Action Plans, and SAFE KIDS programs.
While with FHWA, Rudy held headquarters and field positions in virtually every aspect of
highway safety design and operations. While in FHWA’s headquarters, he served in a
number of leadership positions, including FHWA’s Chief of Safety Design and Operations
and Chief Highway Safety Engineer. He also served as FHWA’s Resource Center Program
Manager for the Strategic Highway Safety Planning, Speed Management, and
Pedestrian Program, working one-on-one with local and state agencies.
Representative Projects
National Highway Safety Program
An FHWA career spanning more than 39 years, serving in its Headquarters and Field
positions involved in virtually every aspect of highway safety including Federal
Legislation and Rulemaking, States’ Strategic Highway Safety Plans, Manual on Uniform
Traffic Control Devices, Road Safety Audits, and Highway Safety Improvement
Programs.
State Strategic Highway Safety Plans
Worked closely with state DOTs and their safety partners providing guidance and
technical assistance in the development and implementation of the States’ Strategic
Highway Safety Plan, Safety Emphasis Area Action Plans, and Highway Safety
Improvement Programs.
Road Safety Audits
Starting in 1996, provided FHWA’s leadership in the national development, marketing,
and implementation of the RSA process. Developed FHWA training curriculum and
conducted RSA and Pedestrian RSA training nationally to federal agencies, tribal
governments, states, and local agencies personnel involved in engineering,
enforcement, education, planning including MPOs, emergency medical services, and
other disciplines. During the past 15 years, in addition to Florida, conducted training
and/or RSAs (Roadway, Pedestrian, School Zone, and Construction) in Alabama,
Arizona, California, Colorado, Hawaii ,Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Michigan, Mississippi,
New Hampshire, New Jersey, Nevada, North Carolina, North Dakota, South Carolina,
South Dakota, Texas, Tennessee, Vermont, West Virginia, and Wisconsin. Most recently,
developed guidance and prompt lists for School Zone RSAs and conducted School RSAs
for FDOT.
Rudolph Umbs, P.E.
Sr. Traffic Safety Engineer
Role: Senior Advisor
Office Location
Oak Creek, WI
Education
BS, Civil Engineering, Marquette
University
Years of Experience
48
Years with Tindale Oliver
9
Certifications
Minnesota P.E.
Florida P.E. #76729
9.D.4
Packet Pg. 360 Attachment: 19-7562 Tindale Oliver Proposal (9249 : Recommendation to approve the Selection Committee’s ranking for SHSP)
www.tindaleoliver.com
Rudolph Umbs, P.E.
Sr. Traffic Safety Engineer
Highway Safety Training
Developed and/or conducted FHWA’s courses in virtually every state including Low Cost Safety Improvements, Highway
Safety Improvement Program, Highway Safety Engineering Studies, Highway Safety Evaluation, Manual on Uniform Traffic
Control Devices, Roadside Safety Design, and Functional Requirements of Highway Safety Features, Developing a
Pedestrian Safety Action Plan, Designing for Pedestrian Safety, and Road Safety Audits.
Developed and conducted training courses for FDOT and local agency engineering, enforcement, and planning personnel,
including Traffic and Safety for Non-Traffic Engineers, Traffic and Safety for Law Enforcement, and the Manual on Uniform
Traffic Control Devices.
Hillsborough County and Pinellas County Pedestrian Safety Action Plans
Developed and implemented multi-agency, multi-discipline Pedestrian Safety Action Plans.
9.D.4
Packet Pg. 361 Attachment: 19-7562 Tindale Oliver Proposal (9249 : Recommendation to approve the Selection Committee’s ranking for SHSP)
DBE | SBE | W/MBE • Tampa • Orlando • South Florida • www.Valerin-Group.com
KEY QUALIFICATIONS
Michelle is an accomplished senior transportation planner and communications professional with more than 18 years of experience in
community engagement, public affairs, and government relations. She possesses a keen ability to develop communications strategies
that effectively connect clients with diverse audiences and has a thorough knowledge of federal, state, and local agency processes and
protocols. Michelle is skilled in the NEPA process and is familiar with all levels of environmental documentation. She has worked on a
variety of high-profile projects, to include roadway, transit, rail, and non-motorized/trail projects, many of which involve land use, zoning,
right-of-way, and noise abatment issues. Her leadership and ability to remain focused ensure timely delivery/completion of project tasks
and deliverables. Prior to joining Valerin, Michelle served as the public involvement coordinator for FDOT District Seven and worked as
the director of planning and administration for TBARTA. For this project, Michelle will serve as project manager, performing oversight of,
directing, and assisting with project-related tasks and deliverables, to include the identification of key stakeholders; coordination of and
preparation for public involvement meetings/workshops; development and distribution of surveys and collection/comprehensive
compilation of data/input received; creation of presentations and other project-related collateral; and generating participation through
web/social media-based and grassroots outreach methods.
RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Hillsborough Area Regional Transit (HART), Autonomous Mobility Service, Hillsborough County, FL: Prior to its cancellation, this
project was on track to introduce a fleet of self-driving shuttles to the downtown Tampa area. The shuttles were slated to operate in an
open environment with live and mixed traffic in an attempt to solve a mobility gap between the Marion Transit Center and employment
centers. Michelle led public involvement efforts including the development of an educational program, a strategic public relations
campaign in addition to the production of newsletters, website and social media content, educational fliers, press releases, and agency
and elected officials communication.
FDOT District 1, Central Manatee Network Alternatives Analysis (AA), Manatee County, FL: Michelle led community engagement
efforts and provided planning support for this transit alternatives analysis. The goal of the study was to identify and program a series of
transportation projects to improve local and regional mobility and support the long-term transportation goals of the cities of Bradenton
and Palmetto. Outreach efforts involved early demographic identification, the development of survey tools, a large social media campaign
and face-to-face communication with system users. Public involvement efforts included the development of a Public Involvement Plan,
newsletters, website development and content, educational fliers, press releases, agency and elected officials outreach, stakeholder
identification and coordination, public meetings and a public hearing.
FDOT District 7, Howard Frankland Bridge Project Development & Environment (PD&E) Study and Regional Transit Corridor
Evaluation, Hillsborough County, FL: Michelle served as the Public Involvement Manager for the joint PD&E study/Corridor evaluation.
The dual-purpose project evaluated the environmental impacts and engineering requirements associated with replacing the northbound
bridge span and conducted a regional transit corridor evaluation between Hillsborough and Pinellas Counties. Extensive public
engagement was completed through traditional and innovative channels providing an open dialogue with the stakeholders and citizens
of Hillsborough and Pinellas Counties and ensuring their participation. Efforts included the development of a Public Involvement Plan,
newsletters, website development and content, educational fliers, press releases, stakeholder identification and coordination, agency
and elected officials outreach, public meetings and a public hearing.
Tampa Bay Area Regional Transportation Authority, TBARTA Master Plan - Hillsborough, Pinellas, Sarasota, Manatee, Pasco,
Hernando, Citrus Counties, FL: In her role as Director of Planning, Michelle was instrumental in meeting the legislatively-mandated
adoption date of the authority’s Regional Transportation Master Plan. The Master Plan examined regional transit and toll facility needs
for a 7-county, 6,000 square mile area in West Central Florida while ensuring the movement of passengers and freight. The Master Plan
Key Qualifications
• 18+ Years of Transportation Industry Experience
• Senior Transportation Planner
• Public Involvement | Public Information Expertise
• Planning, PD&E, Design, Transit
Complete Streets
• Charrette Facilitation
Michelle Greene
Director of Communications
9.D.4
Packet Pg. 362 Attachment: 19-7562 Tindale Oliver Proposal (9249 : Recommendation to approve the Selection Committee’s ranking for SHSP)
Michelle Greene
Public Involvement Manager
DBE | SBE | W/MBE • Tampa • Orlando • South Florida • www.Valerin-Group.com
process included the development of corridor and mode options needed to meet the regional demands for mobility choices as they relate
to economic development, access to affordable housing and jobs and maintaining quality of life. The results included a process for
resolving conflicts between local land use and transportation plans in addition to mid-term and long-term regional transportation visions
that include regional improvements supported by an expansive local bus network. Extensive outreach and coordination efforts occurred
during the development of the master plan including significant communication with municipal governments, local agencies, business
and civic organizations and the public. Three unique working groups were established to gain meaningful input and to shape the vision
of transportation throughout the Tampa Bay region. Efforts included telephone townhall meetings conducted within each county, social
media campaigns, the establishment of a regional online forum and a significant ground presence to foster dialog and advance education.
Tampa Bay Area Regional Transportation Authority, TBARTA Master Plan Update - Hillsborough, Pinellas, Sarasota, Manatee,
Pasco, Hernando, Citrus Counties, FL
Tampa Bay Area Regional Transportation Authority, Pinellas Alternatives Analysis (AA), Pinellas County, FL: Michelle served
as TBARTA’s Project Manager. The study was a cooperative effort between TBARTA, FDOT, Pinellas County MPO and PSTA to look
at premium transit options to connect the major activity centers in Pinellas County – Clearwater, Gateway, and St. Petersburg. The AA
evaluated feasible alternatives and identified a preferred alternative. The study included extensive public engagement and coordination
efforts. Michelle worked to ensure the success of the public engagement program using social media and official messaging. She also
played a key role in ongoing coordination with agency partners.
Tampa Bay Area Regional Transportation Authority, USF to Wesley Chapel Regional Transit Corridor Study, Hillsborough
County, FL: Michelle served as TBARTA’s Project Manager and community outreach manager. The study evaluated transit options for
the extension of premium transit service between the USF area in Hillsborough County and the Wesley Chapel area in Pasco County.
The study identified feasible alternatives to advance to a formal Alternatives Analysis and NEPA study. Public engagement efforts
included coordinating public workshops and community meetings, developing website and newsletter content and preparing responses
to public inquiries.
Tampa Bay Area Regional Transportation Authority, SR54/56 Transit Corridor Study, Hillsborough County, FL: Michelle served
as TBARTA’s Project Manager and community outreach manager. The study evaluated transit options for premium transit service along
the SR 54 Corridor in Pasco County. Public engagement efforts included coordinating public workshops and community meetings,
developing website and newsletter content, and preparing responses to public inquiries.
Tampa Bay Area Regional Transportation Authority, Safe Routes to School School-Pool Rideshare Program, Pinellas County,
FL: Michelle led a team of planning and outreach professionals to manage the SRTS grant program and build and enhance the Pinellas
County SchoolPool database. A SchoolPool is a way of sharing in the duties of getting children to and from school. SchoolPool options
include carpooling, walk pools (“walking school buses”), bike pools (“bike trains”) or arranging bus buddies for school buses or public
transit. Two or more families agree to share responsibilities by trading days as pool leaders. Many parents have taken up Schoo lPooling
as a way to save time, save money and provide a safer way for their children to get to school.
FDOT District 7, Hillsborough, Pinellas, Pasco, Hernando, Citrus Counties, FL: Michelle served as a liaison between the Department
and community officials to ensure local issues and concerns are addressed as part of project planning, engineering and construction.
She was responsible for engaging and working effectively with citizens, appointed boards, elected officials and municipal staff. She
managed districtwide public engagement efforts for roadway, transit studies, community development projects, federal and state-funded
programs and safety initiatives. Michelle planned, organized and facilitated public meetings, workshops, hearings and community events
and developed engaging content for brochures, notifications, newsletters, websites, presentations, reports and briefing materials. She
contributed to the development and implementation of several successful statewide outreach campaigns. Michelle successfully
established and maintained strategic working relationships with elected and appointed officials, business leaders, agency staff,
community advocates and other stakeholders and engaged minority and underserved populations throughout the region to foster
collaboration, participation and support for projects and programs. During her time with the Department, she worked on various projects,
to include the I-4 Improvements (Historic Ybor), I-75 Widening, Florida High Speed Rail, Tampa Intermodal Center(s), Busch Boulevard
Improvements, Selmon Expressway, Gandy Elevated Lanes, US 301 Widening, US 19 Widening & Controlled Access, Bruce B. Downs
Widening, US 19 Widening, Pinellas Bayway Bridges, Johns Pass Bridge, Courtney Campbell Causeway Trail, Friendship Trail, and the
State of Florida Highway Safety Plan.
9.D.4
Packet Pg. 363 Attachment: 19-7562 Tindale Oliver Proposal (9249 : Recommendation to approve the Selection Committee’s ranking for SHSP)
DBE | SBE | W/MBE • Tampa • Orlando • South Florida • www.Valerin-Group.com
KEY QUALIFICATIONS
With over 21 years of experience in dealing with the public, Alice possesses a firm understanding of the communications protocols and
nuances involved when representing private and public sector clients. Over the last 13 years of her career, she has served on a wide
range of state and county projects, having coordinated and conducted countless public meetings and events and serving in various
capacities within the transportation industry, to include Contract Support Specialist (CSS) and Public Information Officer. Fluent in both
English and Spanish, Alice is able to translate project collateral and other relevant information both orally and in writing, thereby ensuring
an inclusive outreach effort and approach. Prior to joining Valerin, Alice worked as a contract support specialist for GBF Engineering,
Inc., where she provided support on FDOT construction projects and was responsible for the preparation of proposals and other
presentation materials. For this project, Alice will hold a key support role, developing and maintaining a stakeholder database; assisting
with design, preparation, advertisement, and distribution of public involvement workshop notifications; coordination and logistics for and
attendance at citizen/public workshops; attendance at work sessions and public hearings and the gathering, compilation, and
summarization of data/input and other project-related activities.
RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
LYNX SR 436 Transit Study, Orlando, FL: LYNX and its partners conducted a transit corridor study on SR 436—also known as Semoran
Boulevard or Altamonte Drive. The focus of this study was the segment of SR 436 between SR 434 in Altamonte Springs and Orlando
International Airport’s South Terminal. SR 436 is a state-operated arterial that serves regional and local travel and is also the “gateway”
into Central Florida for many of the area’s 60 million annual visitors. Alice provided heavy public involvement and community engagement
services for this project, facilitating stakeholder and advisory committee meetings, public workshops, stakeholder interviews, and
Community Liaison focus group meetings. In addition, she was responsible for the development of newsletters and other forms of
marketing collateral and performed social media outreach to further enhance the study’s reach. Alice also provided oral and written bi-
lingual translations to broaden and ensure thorough outreach and engagement of the project’s Spanish-speaking audience.
Hillsborough Area Regional Transit Authority (HART) Transit Development Plan/Comprehensive Operations Analysis, Tampa,
FL: This Transit Development Plan (TDP) was undertaken to serve as HART’s strategic guide for improving public transportation in
Hillsborough County over a ten-year period. The TDP included funded and unfunded needs, service and capital priorities, as well as
implementation and financial plans. In order to receive State Public Transit Block funds from the FDOT, HART is required to perform an
general annual update and regular, five-year updates of the plan to receive State Public Transit Block funds from the Florida Department
of Transportation – with the FY 2018 TDP being a major update that included a Comprehensive Operations Analysis (COA) of the HART
system. For this project, Alice was heavily involved in the public involvement activities, to include attending public workshop and small
discussion group meetings for collecting valuable input and feedback from the public for use in developing a robust transit development
plan and operations analysis.
Marketing and Communications Contract, Hillsborough Area Regional Transit (HART), Hillsborough County, FL: Alice assisted
with community outreach for this task-driven contract, for which the Valerin Group, Inc. served as a sub-consultant for communications
services, providing Spanish translations in oral and written forms.
FDOT District One I-75/University Parkway Diverging Diamond Interchange (DDI), Sarasota/Manatee Counties, FL: Alice served
as a community outreach specialist for this notable project – one of the first diverging diamond interchange projects to be constructed in
the state of Florida and one of the largest in the nation. Alice assisted with the coordination of the highly-attended public information
meeting and groundbreaking event, attended by Governor Rick Scott and local city, county and state officials. Prior to implementation of
the DDI, Alice assisted with numerous educational presentations to a variety of community groups, organizations and agencies,
performing quality assurance of a variety of presentations. Major improvements being made as part of this project consisted of
Key Qualifications
• 21 Years’ Experience in Transportation & Customer Relations
• Public Involvement | Public Information Expertise
• Bi-Lingual (English | Spanish)
Training | Certifications | Affiliations
• Certified Media Training
• FDOT Public Involvement Training
• Plans Reading
• Member, TEAMFL
Alice Ramos
Community Outreach Specialist
9.D.4
Packet Pg. 364 Attachment: 19-7562 Tindale Oliver Proposal (9249 : Recommendation to approve the Selection Committee’s ranking for SHSP)
Alice Ramos
Community Outreach Specialist
DBE | SBE | W/MBE • Tampa • Orlando • South Florida • www.Valerin-Group.com
construction of a diverging diamond interchange, the addition of an auxiliary lane on northbound and southbound I-75, construction of
new bridges on I-75 over University Parkway, widening of University Parkway and I-75, new lighting and signalization, and construction
of a noise wall on the west side of I-75.
FDOT District One US 41 Roundabouts, from 10th Street to 14th Street, Sarasota, FL: Part of an effort by the FDOT and City of
Sarasota to create a Downtown-Bayfront Connection through reconstruction of the signalized intersections along US 41 at 10th and 14th
Streets and replacement of these signalized intersections with roundabouts, this project also entails widening of the roadway between
the two intersections and the addition of bike lanes, turn lanes, a 10-foot shared-use path along the west side, and a 6-foot sidewalk
along the east side. Alice serves the community outreach specialist on this project, coordinating and conducting public meetings,
preparing and distributing project collateral, meeting with residents and property owners, responding to inquiries, and developing and
maintaining a stakeholder database and communications log.
US 27 from Lake Isis Avenue to the Polk County Line, FDOT District One, Highlands County, FL: The improvements on this project
consisted of widening of the roadway from four to six lanes, roadway milling and resurfacing, sidewalks, street lighting, and signalization.
Alice received an above-average score on the quarterly CEI grade in the Communication and Coordination category for her
proactive approach in addressing public concerns, her coordination efforts with the District Public Information Office, and for
providing timely and relevant data for newsletters, media releases, public meetings, and brochures.
I-4 Ultimate Improvement Project, Public Involvement Services, FDOT District Five, Orlando, FL: Alice served as the public
involvement coordinator for this project, working closely with Valerin’s public involvement manager and assisting with the coordination
of an Industry Forum, which was attended by more than 1,200 industry professionals; DBE/SBE workshops; and public meetings
concerning a proposed noise wall.
General Engineering Contract (GEC) – Public Information Services, FDOT District One Bartow Operations: Alice provided in-
house public information services for FDOT Bartow Operations on roadway construction/improvement projects throughout the district.
US 441 from South of Taft Vineland Road to South of the Beachline (SR 528), FDOT District Five, Orange County, FL: This project
is being designed to reduce congestion, enhance safety, and achieve an acceptable level of service while minimizing potential impacts.
The change in access management will be implemented through raised medians to improve safety. Other proposed improvements include
updating of sidewalk connections and crossings to bring into conformance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), and the
improvement of pavement markings. Alice’s support on this project included assisting with the meeting mail outs, as well as attending
and assisting with the public hearing.
US 192 (US 441/SR 500) from E. of Eastern Avenue to Nova Road Design Project, FDOT District Five, St. Cloud, FL: This project
was assigned to Valerin in August 2014 as part of their District Five Districtwide Community Awareness Contract. For this project, Alice
served as a public involvement coordinator, assisting with the coordination and outreach efforts for the public hearing.
North Palm River Drinking Water Project, Hillsborough County, FL: This project involved designing, permitting, and construction of
more than 5 miles of 6 and 8-inch-diameter pipeline, along with installation of approximately 90 fire hydrants at intervals along the pipeline
route. The project provided property owners with access to high-quality drinking water and improved fire protection in the community.
While connection to the County’s water was optional, homeowners were given the opportunity to connect within the initial one-year
connection period, with Hillsborough County offering funding support to allow for connection at minimal cost. Alice served as the lead
public relations professional for this project, responsible for extensive coordination between the contractor, homeowners, and the County;
coordination and conducting of several public meeting, to include sign-up events; regular interface with homeowners and the project
team; attending regular progress meetings; preparing and distributing project collateral and notifications; providing timely responses to
issues and inquiries; and developing and maintaining a stakeholder database and communications log.
Design Criteria Professional (DCP) Contract, Hillsborough County, Tampa, FL: This contract includes a public involvement
component to design criteria oversight of the Northwest Regional Water Reclamation Facility Expansion Project, which required the
development of an outreach oversight plan encompassing tasks, deliverables, internal and external communication protocols, and a
timeline structure for all processes. Alice was responsible for developing the plan and providing oversight throughout the duration of the
project’s procurement and construction phases, and ongoing service as a liaison between project staff and Hillsborough County
communications personnel and regular interface and coordination with the Design-Build team’s public outreach representative.
9.D.4
Packet Pg. 365 Attachment: 19-7562 Tindale Oliver Proposal (9249 : Recommendation to approve the Selection Committee’s ranking for SHSP)
9.D.4
Packet Pg. 366 Attachment: 19-7562 Tindale Oliver Proposal (9249 : Recommendation to approve the Selection Committee’s ranking for SHSP)
COLLIER MPO | Collier County Strategic Highway Safety Plan 2 - 1
Tab 2 – Certified Minority Business Enterprise
CERTIFIED MINORITY BUSINESS ENTERPRISE
Tindale Oliver is not a certified minority business enterprise,
but we often team with DBE firms and small local businesses.
For this project, our team includes The Valerin Group, a
woman-owned, certified DBE and MBE firm with FDOT. Our
expectation is that 10.65% of the project budget will be
assigned to Valerin for public engagement and outreach
activities and other project support, consistent with FDOT’s
goal for FHWA-assisted contracts. A record of of Valerin’s
Florida UCP DBE certification is included on the following
page.
9.D.4
Packet Pg. 367 Attachment: 19-7562 Tindale Oliver Proposal (9249 : Recommendation to approve the Selection Committee’s ranking for SHSP)
COLLIER MPO | Collier County Strategic Highway Safety Plan 2 - 2
Tab 2 – Certified Minority Business Enterprise
9.D.4
Packet Pg. 368 Attachment: 19-7562 Tindale Oliver Proposal (9249 : Recommendation to approve the Selection Committee’s ranking for SHSP)
9.D.4
Packet Pg. 369 Attachment: 19-7562 Tindale Oliver Proposal (9249 : Recommendation to approve the Selection Committee’s ranking for SHSP)
COLLIER COUNTY | Collier County MPO Strategic Highway Safety Plan 3 - 1
Tab 3 – Past Performance
REFERENCE QUESTIONNAIRES AND
PROJECT SUMMARIES
As requested in the solicitation, Reference Questionnaire forms
for projects similar in size, type, and complexity to the
Strategic Highway Safety Plan project are included in this
section, along with detailed project summary sheets for each.
Referenced projects include:
> FDOT District 4 Road Safety Audits and Safety Studies
> Sarasota Manatee MPO Safety Performance Measures and
Road Safety Audits
> FDOT District 7 Bicycle/Pedestrian Access to Transit
> FDOT District 7 Districtwide Safety Studies and Minor
Design
With the exception of the Sarasota/Manatee MPO Project,
these reference projects are multi-year $1.5 million and $5
million task order contracts that cover broad aspects of safety
program management including the following key elements
relevant to this project:
> Crash data management and analysis: We gather,
organize, and maintain web–based, GIS-enabled crash
data systems for FDOT Districts 4 and 7. These data
systems are the first line of attack when addressing
complaints and known safety issues but are even more
important for identifying opportunities for proactive safety
project development. These data systems also incorporate
spatially-enabled document archives and are used to track
and monitor client and partner agency implementation of
safety study recommendations.
> Stakeholder coordination: Although FDOT has ownership
and maintenance authority over the State Highway
System, Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP)
funding can be used on all elements of the public roadway
network. FDOT also relies on local partners for signal and
street light maintenance, among other things.
Accordingly, our work on these reference projects has
required extensive coordination with MPOs and County
public works and City traffic departments. Recent efforts
in Districts 4 and 7 have also considered how the
development review process can be better geared to
address site access safety issues.
> Site specific and programmatic recommendations: Each of
the reference projects has resulted in actionable
recommendations for both site-specific issues and
programmatic implementation of solutions on a systemic
basis. Collectively, Tindale Oliver is responsible for
developing more than $100 million in safety improvement
projects.
This safety experience, along with our firm’s overall
understanding of the metropolitan planning process and
public infrastructure planning and finance, makes the Tindale
Oliver Team exceptionally well-qualified to develop Collier
County’s SHSP.
9.D.4
Packet Pg. 370 Attachment: 19-7562 Tindale Oliver Proposal (9249 : Recommendation to approve the Selection Committee’s ranking for SHSP)
COLLIER COUNTY | Collier County MPO Strategic Highway Safety Plan 3 - 2
Tab 3 – Past Performance
9.D.4
Packet Pg. 371 Attachment: 19-7562 Tindale Oliver Proposal (9249 : Recommendation to approve the Selection Committee’s ranking for SHSP)
COLLIER COUNTY | Collier County MPO Strategic Highway Safety Plan 3 - 3
Tindale Oliver has been contracted to provide FDOT District 4 Traffic Operations
with professional services for conducting Road Safety Audits (RSAs) and safety
studies. The analysis and recommendations are used to develop, fund, and
program recommendations targeting the emphasis areas of the Florida Strategic
Highway Safety Program.
As a consultant to FDOT District 4, Tindale Oliver has performed dozens of RSAs.
The primary focus of these has been pedestrian and bicycle safety; however,
safety recommendations have been generated to improve safety for all users
and have included specialty areas such as work zone safety improvements,
wrong-way driving, and rural highway needs. In addition, Tindale Oliver has
performed numerous typical safety studies at high crash locations and made
short and long term recommendations varying in complexity from signage
improvements to intersection and corridor construction projects.
Tindale Oliver has also developed a crash data system and an improvement
tracking system. The tracking system is used to monitor the progress and
responses of RSA recommendations.
Knowledge
> RSA processes and procedures
> Pedestrian/bicycle safety
> Safety engineering methods
> Crash data analysis, system development
> Strategic safety program development
> Public outreach and stakeholder coordination
Insights
> Expertise in pedestrian and bicycle safety
> Understanding of reactive and proactive safety solutions
> Knowledge of appropriate funding mechanisms for various improvement
concept (short- to long-term)
> Application of processes developed in other FDOT Districts (streamlined and
value-added processes)
Outcomes
> Implementable RSA recommendations
> Development of safety recommendations, short- and long-term
> Development of crash data and improvements tracking systems
> Implementation and programming of millions of dollars in projects with
Federal safety funds
In addition to the contract-level project outcomes, the following page includes
two examples of strategic safety program development led by Tindale Oliver.
FDOT District 4 Road Safety Audit and
Safety Studies Districtwide Contract
FDOT District 4
Tindale Oliver Contact:
W. T. Bowman, P.E.
Associate Director of Transportation
Engineering and Safety
6301 NW 5th Way, Suite 2700
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309
(954) 641-5680
wbowman@tindaleoliver.com
Client Contact:
Thomas Miller
Traffic Safety Specialist IV
FDOT District 4
3400 West Commercial Boulevard
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309
(954) 777-4073
Thomas.Miller@dot.state.fl.us
Geometric Improvements Recommended from
a RSA
9.D.4
Packet Pg. 372 Attachment: 19-7562 Tindale Oliver Proposal (9249 : Recommendation to approve the Selection Committee’s ranking for SHSP)
COLLIER COUNTY | Collier County MPO Strategic Highway Safety Plan 3 - 4
Tab 3 – Past Performance
Systemic Bridge Safety Improvements:
To address safety and mobility issues related to
pedestrians and bicyclists traveling between the
mainland and the barrier island communities,
Tindale Oliver was tasked with developing a
methodology to systemically review Intracoastal
Waterway (ICWW) Bridges to prioritize candidates
for short- and long-term improvements. The
prioritization was based on the presence of existing
bicycle and pedestrian facilities, bridge speed, and
“exposure” (volume) data. Once bridges were
prioritized, Tindale Oliver developed an algorithmic
approach to apply existing bridge information to
generate a first-cut list of potential improvements.
This effort included coordination with FDOT’s ICWW
team, which included Design, Structures, Planning,
and Maintenance, to review and determine
feasibility of short- and mid-term improvements.
The outcomes of this effort is implementation of a
systemic method to rank bridges for consideration
of feasible near-term improvements to enhance
ped/bike mobility, as well as providing a ranking for
consideration for allocation of funding or future
project development as part of reconstruction or
rehabilitation projects or as stand-alone
improvements.
Non-Motorized Design Retrofits for Interchanges
Many interchanges were designed and built without consideration for pedestrian and bicyclist interactions with higher-speed
motor-vehicle traffic. To provide guidance for updating older designs, Tindale Oliver reviewed approximately 10 “typical”
interchange configurations along I-95 in Broward County. Tindale Oliver then developed typical treatments for pedestrian and
bicycle facilities that include buffered bike lanes, green bike lanes, and location of and signing for pedestrian crossings.
Recommendations included consideration of national interchange ramp termini best practices and design practices adopted by
the California DOT for interchange retrofits. After review with the design team, the plans were subsequently adopted as a
District 4 standard for consideration of inclusion in all future interchange projects and for interchange retrofits. Deviation from
the standards requires approval of the District Design Engineer.
Example bridge improvement recommendations
Example Interchange Typical Section Drawings
9.D.4
Packet Pg. 373 Attachment: 19-7562 Tindale Oliver Proposal (9249 : Recommendation to approve the Selection Committee’s ranking for SHSP)
COLLIER COUNTY | Collier County MPO Strategic Highway Safety Plan 3 - 5
Tab 3 – Past Performance
9.D.4
Packet Pg. 374 Attachment: 19-7562 Tindale Oliver Proposal (9249 : Recommendation to approve the Selection Committee’s ranking for SHSP)
COLLIER COUNTY | Collier County MPO Strategic Highway Safety Plan 3 - 6
After successfully supporting the MPO with developing an assessment of the
baseline conditions for reporting of the Highway Safety Improvement Program
(HSIP) performance measure targets, the Sarasota/Manatee MPO once again
looked to Tindale Oliver for developing and preparing safety performance
measure targets and conducting roadways safety assessments. This analysis
identified high crash locations based on the fatal and serious injury safety
performance measures. Through coordination with the MPO and the Technical
Advisory Committee, four of the top locations were selected for field
assessments following the approach for road safety audits that included a
multidisciplinary team of planners, engineers, and law enforcement. These
assessments generated short-, mid-, and long-term recommendations for the
MPO’s inclusion in future TIP priorities.
Knowledge/Insights
> Passage of MAP-21 Federal legislation introduced performance-based
planning, including establishment of baseline conditions and future
planning horizon targets for MPOs nationwide.
> Use of GIS-based tools and automated screening methodologies enhanced
efficiency of identifying high crash candidate corridors.
> Understanding of MPO planning requirements and safety planning
emphasis to develop statewide and urban-area comparisons.
> Proven strategy for engaging a multi-disciplinary team in the RSA process
for developing short-, mid– and long-range strategies.
Outcomes
> Developed trend scenarios for assessing Vision Zero targets in reducing
traffic fatalities.
> Presented recommended safety targets for adoption by the MPO Board.
> Provided a process for the MPO to use in developing future safety targets.
> Identified project strategies and recommendations for prioritizing through
the Transportation Improvement Program.
Safety Performance Measures and
Road Safety Audits
Sarasota/Manatee MPO
Tindale Oliver Contact:
Wally Blain
Sr. Project Manager
1000 N. Ashley Drive , Suite 400
Tampa, FL 33602
(813) 224-8862
wblain@tindaleoliver.com
Client Contact:
David Hutchinson
Executive Director
Sarasota/Manatee MPO
7632 15th Street East
Sarasota, FL 34243
(941) 359-5772
dave@mympo.org
A multi-disciplinary team of planners,
engineers, and law enforcement officers
gather as part of the RSA process to review
corridor conditions and observations.
Analysis of fatal and serious injury crashes
identified corridors and hot spot locations for
review during the RSA process.
9.D.4
Packet Pg. 375 Attachment: 19-7562 Tindale Oliver Proposal (9249 : Recommendation to approve the Selection Committee’s ranking for SHSP)
COLLIER COUNTY | Collier County MPO Strategic Highway Safety Plan 3 - 7
Tab 3 – Past Performance
Review of crash records
identified the top tier
corridors for review based
on the federal
performance measures of
fatalities and serious
injuries.
Summaries, like this one for 15th Street, included the location of fatal (red) and serious injury (orange) crashes,
observations regarding the corridor characteristics, trends and crash patterns, along with potential
opportunities for addressing safety issues.
9.D.4
Packet Pg. 376 Attachment: 19-7562 Tindale Oliver Proposal (9249 : Recommendation to approve the Selection Committee’s ranking for SHSP)
COLLIER COUNTY | Collier County MPO Strategic Highway Safety Plan 3 - 8
Tab 3 – Past Performance
9.D.4
Packet Pg. 377 Attachment: 19-7562 Tindale Oliver Proposal (9249 : Recommendation to approve the Selection Committee’s ranking for SHSP)
COLLIER COUNTY | Collier County MPO Strategic Highway Safety Plan 3 - 9
FDOT District 7 initiated a districtwide effort to improve the safety of transit
users within its boundaries. Tindale Oliver is leading a team to study this key
mobility issue and make recommendations for short- and long-term
improvements. The Tampa/St. Petersburg/Clearwater metropolitan area is one
of several in Florida identified as being among the most challenging for bicycle
and pedestrian safety in the US, and several high transit ridership areas
correspond to these locations. To date, 18 task work orders have been issued.
Knowledge
> Tracking database for follow-up.
> Data-driven methodologies for corridor identification.
> Facilitation of partnerships with agencies and jurisdictions.
Insights
> Needs of traffic operations, transit, and safety sometimes conflict and
require compromises, complexity, or creative solutions.
> Long-term nature of roadway improvements often involve staff changes that
may cost precious time in implementation of improvements.
Outcomes
> Developed data-driven methodology to objectively identify corridors for
study and measure progress.
> Worked closely with transit agencies and local jurisdictions to facilitate
partnerships that can get fixes accomplished and open up funding
opportunities.
> Created tracking system to ensure necessary follow-up on observed safety
issues.
> Task Work Orders completed include:
♦ Districtwide Bike-Ped Transit Strategic Plan
♦ Roadway Safety Audits (3 task orders at multiple locations)
♦ Project Management Website (3 task orders)
♦ Bus Stop Data Collection/Assessments
♦ Design Reviews & Development Recommendations
♦ Transit Along Major Highways Assessment
♦ US 19 Corridor Assessment
♦ Safety Research, Analysis, and Meeting Facilitation
♦ Transit-Pedestrian Safety Workshops
♦ Project Meetings and Miscellaneous Support
♦ In-house Support Services
Bicycle and Pedestrian Access to Transit
Safety Studies
FDOT District 7, Tampa
Tindale Oliver Contact:
Demian Miller, AICP
Principal
1000 North Ashley Drive, Suite 400
Tampa, FL 33602
(813) 224-8862
dmiller@tindaleoliver.com
Client Contact:
Stephen Benson
Government Liaison Administrator
FDOT District 7
11201 N McKinley Drive
Tampa, FL 33612
(813) 975-6427
stephen.benson@dot.state.fl.us
Intersection improvement concepts to improve
safety and access to transit
9.D.4
Packet Pg. 378 Attachment: 19-7562 Tindale Oliver Proposal (9249 : Recommendation to approve the Selection Committee’s ranking for SHSP)
COLLIER COUNTY | Collier County MPO Strategic Highway Safety Plan 3 - 10
Tab 3 – Past Performance
Safety focus area identification using transit ridership and non-motorized crash data
Example recommendation resulting from safety review of high-crash/ridership location
9.D.4
Packet Pg. 379 Attachment: 19-7562 Tindale Oliver Proposal (9249 : Recommendation to approve the Selection Committee’s ranking for SHSP)
COLLIER COUNTY | Collier County MPO Strategic Highway Safety Plan 3 - 11
Tab 3 – Past Performance
9.D.4
Packet Pg. 380 Attachment: 19-7562 Tindale Oliver Proposal (9249 : Recommendation to approve the Selection Committee’s ranking for SHSP)
COLLIER COUNTY | Collier County MPO Strategic Highway Safety Plan 3 - 12
Tindale Oliver has served as a prime safety consultant to FDOT District 7 since
2007. Over that time, our role has grown from developing and maintaining a
crash data management system (CDMS) to conducting a vast array of safety
studies to truly serving as a partner in developing and maintaining one of the
most comprehensive and innovative 4E safety programs in Florida. The District’s
safety program involves proactive and reactive responses to safety issues within
Tampa Bay, and the Tindale Oliver team supports all aspects, providing data-
driven engineering analysis in identifying safety solutions (spot and systemic),
employing experts in education and law enforcement, and facilitating close
coordination with local partner agencies to support on- and off-system safety
solutions and programs. Tindale Oliver has partnered with FDOT’s safety
program for 10+ years in advancing FHWA’s vision of “Toward Zero Deaths.”
Knowledge
> Local, state, and federal safety programs and funding mechanisms.
> Thorough understanding of crash data and nuances associated with use.
> Procedures for spot and systemic screening for specific locations or
systemic application of countermeasures.
Insights
> Developed web-based Crash Data Management System to efficiently
undertake project identification and analysis.
> Created educational pieces to change driver behavior, pedestrian behavior,
influence parents to buckle up children correctly, etc.
> In-depth historical understanding of policies and procedures applied by
FHWA in advancing safety initiatives.
> Staff that includes school, law enforcement, and Federal safety experts
(4E approach).
Outcomes
> Developed off-system safety program to allocate HSIP funds for off-system
safety projects.
> Developed web-based geographic information system to screen crash data
and identify overlaps in safety projects with other FDOT data (lighting data,
permits, previous studies, traffic signal databases, etc.).
> Instrumental in creating award winning educational safety materials with
the help of many partners, including MADD, TAC (Tampa Alcohol Coalition),
and NOYS (National Organizations for Youth Safety).
> Identified $100+ million in programmed safety projects.
The graphics on the following page are examples of public workshop materials
developed by Tindale Oliver to support a FDOT-funded update to Pasco County’s
Pedestrian & Bicycle Safety Action Plan. The graphics illustrate both
infrastructure retrofit concepts to improve non-motorized safety and mobility as
well as programmatic and non-infrastructure strategies.
Safety Studies and Minor Design
FDOT District 7, Tampa
Tindale Oliver Contact:
W. T. Bowman, P.E.
Associate Director of Transportation
Engineering and Safety
6301 NW 5th Way, Suite 2700
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309
(954) 641-5680
wbowman@tindaleoliver.com
Client Contact:
Peter Hsu
District Safety & Special Projects Engineer
FDOT District 7
11201 N. McKinley Drive
Tampa, FL 33612-6403
(813) 975-6026
Ping.Hsu@dot.state.fl.us
Tindale Oliver created and distributed
educational tip cards for drivers and
pedestrians on the correct use of a Pedestrian
Hybrid Beacon”
9.D.4
Packet Pg. 381 Attachment: 19-7562 Tindale Oliver Proposal (9249 : Recommendation to approve the Selection Committee’s ranking for SHSP)
COLLIER COUNTY | Collier County MPO Strategic Highway Safety Plan 3 - 13
Tab 3 – Past Performance
9.D.4
Packet Pg. 382 Attachment: 19-7562 Tindale Oliver Proposal (9249 : Recommendation to approve the Selection Committee’s ranking for SHSP)
9.D.4
Packet Pg. 383 Attachment: 19-7562 Tindale Oliver Proposal (9249 : Recommendation to approve the Selection Committee’s ranking for SHSP)
COLLIER MPO | Collier County Strategic Highway Safety Plan 4 - 1
Tab 4 – Project Approach, Willingness to Meet Time and Budget Requirements
PROJECT APPROACH
Project Management and Public Outreach
Project Management
As discussed under “Budget Control and On-Time Delivery,”
Tindale Oliver develops a Project Management Plan (PMP) for
each project that details the specific QA/QC plan, schedule,
communication protocols, project staffing, subconsultant
responsibilities, and high-level project goals. As part of our
overall approach to Project Management, Tindale Oliver will:
> Facilitate brief weekly project check-in calls.
> Prepare detailed written monthly progress reports that
will include anticipated work tasks for the subsequent
month and a summary of any issues/threats to the project
schedule or budget.
> Ensure adequate schedule available for in-house QC
reviews, client review, and revision prior to transmittal of
interim or final deliverables to the MPO’s Board,
committees, partner agencies, or the public.
As part of the overall project management process, Tindale
Oliver will also explore with MPO staff whether it is appropriate
to incorporate a Project Advisory Committee (PAC) into the
management process. Incorporating a PAC made up of
implementing agencies may streamline data gathering and
analysis tasks and also may help to secure more buy-in for
project implementation planning. If the project does not use a
PAC structure, then Tindale Oliver will facilitate individual
stakeholder interviews and coordination calls to understand
opportunities and constraints and to vet recommendations
and implementation strategies.
Public Outreach
Tindale Oliver and Valerin will work together to develop a draft
Public Involvement Plan (PIP) which will be incorporated as
part of the overall PMP for the project. Generally, Tindale
Oliver applies a four-step process to public involvement as
follows:
Step 1 – Outreach: This part of the process involves getting the
word out about the project by “going to the people.” This can
be started by County staff and partner agencies even before
the project begins. Tools include websites and existing County
social media as well as earned media through press releases.
Step 2 – Listen: This step runs parallel to the technical analysis
task. In this step, the team will gather information about
community needs and perceptions. A critical aspect of the
listening process is to gather perspectives that, when
combined with the technical data and analysis process, can be
used to develop recommendations that will resonate with the
community. Strategies for this phase include:
> Open house workshops
> Presentations to civic groups, neighborhood associations,
and pop-up events
> Wiki-Mapping online issue identification
> Web-based surveys related to issue identification
Step 3 – Collaborate/Educate: This aspect of the public
involvement process more deeply engages stakeholders to
assist in selecting/refining the design concept. A key benefit of
this process is that it provides an opportunity for community
activists to engage in a hands-on method that educates them
on some of the technical constraints that apply to developing
transportation solutions in constrained urban corridors.
Strategies that apply to this part of the process include:
> Hands-on workshop – potentially held in the field at a
problem location to discuss issues and potential solutions
> Online and surveys related to draft recommendations
> MPO Board and Committee Briefings
Step 4 – Consensus: Prior to completing the Final Report, the
recommendations and implementation plan will be reviewed
with key MPO committees and the MPO Board in a workshop
session to ensure that questions and concerns are addressed
and consensus has been obtained to implement high-priority
recommendations.
Heights Mobility Study WikiMap site showing georeferenced citizen
comments identifying transportation infrastructure and safety needs.
9.D.4
Packet Pg. 384 Attachment: 19-7562 Tindale Oliver Proposal (9249 : Recommendation to approve the Selection Committee’s ranking for SHSP)
COLLIER MPO | Collier County Strategic Highway Safety Plan 4 - 2
Tab 4 – Project Approach, Willingness to Meet Time and Budget Requirements
As part of the overall public involvement process, Valerin will
provide complete meeting summaries and interview notes
that can be used as a resource once the project moves into
implementation. Additionally, the Team will incorporate an
Environmental Justice (EJ) analysis of the public involvement
process to ensure that under-represented groups are
appropriately engaged in the project process.
GIS & Other Data
Consistent with the project RPS, all GIS and other data assets
will be archived in an organized format with necessary meta-
data and delivered to the MPO at the conclusion of the study.
This is important to ensure key analyses are reproducible for
ongoing monitoring efforts.
Crash Report Consistency
As a data management vendor for jurisdictions across Florida,
Tindale Oliver understands the supply-chain of crash data
from the report originator through DHSMV’s data vendor and
into the FIRES portal, Signal 4 Analytics, and FDOT’s CAR
system. As part of this project, we will conduct a comparative
analysis of crash report completeness and internal
consistency between Collier County’s Law Enforcement
Agencies (LEAs) and will conduct agency interviews to
document internal QC processes.
Depending on the outcomes of this analysis, Tindale Oliver
will work with the Collier Community Traffic Safety Team and/
or individual LEAs to bring in our traffic enforcement expert,
Sgt. George Edmiston, to facilitate seminars to help improve
crash report consistency and accuracy.
Traffic Control Signs
Ensuring proper traffic sign (and pavement marking) size,
placement, and retro-reflectivity are relatively low-cost
strategies to reduce crashes. Tindale Oliver’s traffic
engineering staff will document current Collier County (and
FDOT) practices for each element of the roadway network and
identify opportunities for improvement based on national
best practices.
Considerations include use of advance street name signs,
oversized and redundant stop signs (and other warning signs),
consistent use of fluorescent yellow-green signs for school
zones, use of internally-illuminated street name signs along
major roadways, and appropriate use of in-pavement
wayfinding markings.
Tindale Oliver will also evaluate the County’s pavement
marking asset/maintenance data resources and replacement
cycles with special consideration to life-cycle variations by
sign direction and traffic volume/truck traffic impacts on
pavement markings.
Statistical Analysis
Prior to conducting statistical analysis, Tindale Oliver will
evaluate the completeness of 2018 data by conducting month
-over-month comparisons with past years to make a
recommendation as to whether 2013–17 or 2014–18 is the
most appropriate five-year window for analysis. We will also
manually review all Fatal, Incapacitating Injury and Non-
Motorized User crash reports to ensure that the crashes types
are coded correctly and to re-verify the crash location.
In addition to the analyses specified by the RPS, Tindale Oliver
recommends the following be evaluated:
> Major roadway crash rate analysis using traffic crash data
and available AADT data
> Comparison of crash rate and crashes per lane mile for
different roadway types considering factors such as
number of lanes and median type, speed limit, and
functional class
> Correlation of socioeconomic factors (e.g., percent
households in poverty, automobile ownership, etc.) with
non-motorized user crashes
> Analysis of over-represented crash types at intersections
or along roadway segments (e.g., percent angle/left-turn
crashes, percent injury rear-end crashes, percent
nighttime crashes)
As part of the manual review of severe and non-motorized
crashes, Tindale Oliver will also provide a qualitative
assessment of crash factors to identify common elements that
may not be well-represented by the codified crash report
data.
Outcomes of the crash data analysis process will be compiled
in a Draft Technical Memorandum and also summarized in a
series of infographics suitable for publishing on the project
website and display at public meetings.
9.D.4
Packet Pg. 385 Attachment: 19-7562 Tindale Oliver Proposal (9249 : Recommendation to approve the Selection Committee’s ranking for SHSP)
COLLIER MPO | Collier County Strategic Highway Safety Plan 4 - 3
Tab 4 – Project Approach, Willingness to Meet Time and Budget Requirements
Recommendations
4E Recommendations
Developing recommendations for the four Es will be guided by
the FDOT Strategic Highway Safety Plan and relate to FHWA’s
Proven Safety Countermeasures. Based on our work in other
urban/suburban Florida communities, we anticipate that the
following are likely strategies that will be incorporated in
Collier County’s SHSP:
> Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE): FDOT is in the process
of implementing FHWA’s ICE process to evaluate
alternative intersection options. Many of the alternative
concepts eliminate direct left turns to reduce the number
of signal phases from four to two. This has benefits for
motor vehicle safety and can also enhance safety for non-
motorized users by reducing cycle lengths, providing multi-
stage crossings, and increasing signal-density.
> Complete Streets: Consideration should be given to
applying FDOT’s context classification and corresponding
design standards to major county roadways. Tindale Oliver
has helped FDOT implement context class in District 7 and
will work with MPO staff to consider applying this criterion
as part of the Collier County SHSP.
> Pedestrian Design Best Practices: As instructors for FHWA,
Tindale Oliver will incorporate key design practices to
enhance pedestrian safety as part of the SHPS.
> Consideration of Level of Traffic Stress (LTS) Criteria:
Emerging guidance for bicycle mobility/safety considers
LTS criteria as an alternative to FDOT’s Bicycle Q/LOS
measures. LTS considers all bicycling experience levels
rather than just the preferences of confident road riders.
> Rural Road Standards: In exurban areas, traffic volume
growth along nominally substandard rural “farm-to-
market” roads can lead to low-frequency/high-severity
crash issues. The SHSP will consider this issue and
potentially identify a sub-network of roadways to upgrade
to minimum “Greenbook” standards over time.
Funding Strategies
Identifying funding strategies for the recommended project,
programs, and actions based on available revenues will build
on the past success that Tindale Oliver has demonstrated
through support to MPOs and FDOT Districts statewide. We
will review with MPO staff a matrix of available funding
programs and discuss the benefits and potential pitfalls
associated with each. Through an understanding of the MPO’s
current approach to boxing Federal Surface Transportation
Program funds, we will also review opportunities for
integrating recommendations of the SHSP into the MPO’s
Congestion Management Process box funds and Bicycle/
Pedestrian box funds. Through coordination with LRTP
development, recommendations can be coordinated to
investigate alternatives strategies moving forward for boxing
or allocating the Federal STP funds.
Implementation Planning
Developing short-, mid-, and long-term recommendations will
allow Tindale Oliver and the MPO to integrate
recommendations from previously-completed studies in
determining the priority for building a comprehensive
program of safety strategies targeted at reducing fatalities
and serious injuries in support of the statewide Vision Zero
goal. This phase of establishing recommendations will
incorporate timing, estimated costs, and potential strategies.
Using the Crash Modification Factors from the FHWA
clearinghouse, the implementation recommendations will
assist the MPO in identifying priority locations with the
greatest potential safety benefits. Recommendations from
completed RSAs that are yet to be implemented will also be
reviewed by the study team for a full complement of
prioritized recommendations coming from the SHSP. This will
also include the corridors identified during the Bicycle/
Pedestrian Master Plan.
Because of the value Tindale Oliver can bring to the Data
Analysis component of the project, we also anticipate
completing initial screening of corridors recommended during
the Bicycle/Pedestrian Master Plan, and additional high-crash
locations identified through this project, to define specific
preliminary implementation strategies for critical corridors.
These will also serve as “go-by” examples for how to apply
Plan recommendations to other corridors.
Monitoring
Tindale Oliver will work with MPO staff to identify monitoring
strategies related to both traffic crash outcomes and nominal
progress towards implementing SHSP strategies. Final
delivery of GIS data, spreadsheets, and other supporting data
elements will be done in a manner that will facilitate
transparency in the SHSP development process and ongoing
monitoring of plan performance.
Draft and Final Documents
Tindale Oliver has a reputation for providing high-quality
report deliverables that are technically-accurate, as well as
digestible by non-expert readers. Consistent with the detailed
schedule on the following page, we have reserved
approximately 4.5 months of the overall 9-month schedule for
delivery, review, and revision of Draft and Final report
documents. All materials will be reviewed with MPO staff and
vetted as appropriate with implementing agency stakeholder
before presentation to the MPO’s committees or Board.
9.D.4
Packet Pg. 386 Attachment: 19-7562 Tindale Oliver Proposal (9249 : Recommendation to approve the Selection Committee’s ranking for SHSP)
COLLIER MPO | Collier County Strategic Highway Safety Plan 4 - 4
Tab 4 – Project Approach, Willingness to Meet Time and Budget Requirements
Collier County MPO Strategic Highway Safety Plan
Tindale Oliver Proposed Project Schedule
2019
Task Description NTP + MONTH
1
MONTH
2
MONTH
3
MONTH
4
MONTH
5
MONTH
6
MONTH
7
MONTH
8
MONTH
9
PROJECT MANAGEMENT &
PUBLIC OUTREACH
Project Management
Public Outreach
GIS & Other Data
Crash Report Consistency
Traffic Control Signs
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
Comprehensive CDMS Analysis
Baseline Statistic Metrics
CDMS Data Analysis (2013–2017)
Mapping
FDOT’s SHSP 12 Emphasis Areas
RECOMMENDATIONS
Program and Projected
Recommendations that Address 4Es
Federal, State, Local Funding Programs
Implementing Recommendations
FDOT’s Vision Zero Evaluating Structure
DRAFT AND FINAL DOCUMENT
Strategic Highway Safety Plan Document
Strategic Highway Safety Plan Document
Revisions
Document Delivery
Hard Copies of Report (20)
Draft SHSP Final SHSP Task Duration
9.D.4
Packet Pg. 387 Attachment: 19-7562 Tindale Oliver Proposal (9249 : Recommendation to approve the Selection Committee’s ranking for SHSP)
COLLIER MPO | Collier County Strategic Highway Safety Plan 4 - 5
Tab 4 – Project Approach, Willingness to Meet Time and Budget Requirements
BUDGET CONTROL AND ON-TIME DELIVERY
Since 1989, Tindale Oliver has demonstrated its ability to
complete projects on time and within budget, rarely requiring
change orders. This track record has been accomplished
through a commitment to a project scheduling and budgeting
process that begins with the application of Tindale Oliver’s
Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC).
Tindale Oliver believes that the general approach we have
developed over the past 30 years in working on task-order
contracts for MPOs is applicable to ensuring the successful
completion of the Collier County Strategic Highway Safety
Plan. The six key elements for this successful approach include
1) listen, 2) develop understandable scope, 3) finalize scope,
budget, and schedule, 4) coordinate work effort, 5) prepare
monthly reports, and 6) produce deliverables.
Key Elements of Tindale Oliver’s Quality Program
Quality Assurance – QA procedures involve input from peers
outside the project team, often referred to as Independent
Technical Reviewers. Tindale Oliver’s QA/QC Principal or
another designated expert will serve as the primary
Independent Technical Reviewer for each task, providing
comments and feedback from a perspective that comes from
not being involved in the day-to-day details of the project.
Quality Control – QC procedures include efforts aimed at
countering errors or misjudgments and identifying
opportunities for improvement. This includes intra-team
technical review and professional editorial review to help
ensure the quality of deliverables that clients have come to
expect from us.
Schedule Adherence – Through our historical performance
with clients throughout Florida and the US, Tindale Oliver has
a proven track record with on-time performance. Local policy
issues or other reasons beyond our control were the primary
reasons for delay in the rare instances in which projects were
not completed according to the original schedule.
Executing the QA/AC Program
Tindale Oliver’s Project Management Plan
Tindale Oliver understands the diverse needs of its clients and
has developed project management procedures to help
ensure the execution of the QA/QC program. A Project
Management Plan (PMP) is prepared to facilitate management
of major task work orders and includes the following major
items:
> Project goals and objectives
> Client Bill of Rights
> Project contacts
> Project responsibility assignments, including
subconsultants
> Scope of work
> Project deliverables
> Project schedule, including milestones and meeting dates
The PMP is distributed and reviewed with the entire project
team to ensure that all are working toward the same goals and
objectives, creating a cohesive team and providing the client
with consistent, superior deliverables. The PMP also is an
excellent tool for the client to track the project’s progress and
the Tindale Oliver Team’s performance.
Cultural Commitment to Quality
Most important is Tindale Oliver’s cultural commitment to
quality that has been demonstrated since being established in
1989. This commitment is evidenced by the project
management philosophy and techniques espoused by Tindale
Oliver for the successful management of projects and client
relationships. The Tindale Oliver Team looks forward to
applying this philosophy to this contract.
CONCLUSION
In conclusion, Tindale Oliver will ensure responsiveness to the
Collier MPO in three key ways:
> Corporate commitment to QA/QC, as proven by our long-
term relationship with Collier MPO and public agencies
throughout Florida and the US
> Sound project management principles, as evidenced by
our commitment to communication and project
management planning
> Personal commitment from the project management
team
9.D.4
Packet Pg. 388 Attachment: 19-7562 Tindale Oliver Proposal (9249 : Recommendation to approve the Selection Committee’s ranking for SHSP)
COLLIER MPO | Collier County Strategic Highway Safety Plan 4 - 6
Tab 4 – Project Approach, Willingness to Meet Time and Budget Requirements
9.D.4
Packet Pg. 389 Attachment: 19-7562 Tindale Oliver Proposal (9249 : Recommendation to approve the Selection Committee’s ranking for SHSP)
9.D.4
Packet Pg. 390 Attachment: 19-7562 Tindale Oliver Proposal (9249 : Recommendation to approve the Selection Committee’s ranking for SHSP)
COLLIER MPO | Collier County Strategic Highway Safety Plan 5 - 1
Tab 5 – Location
OFFICE LOCATIONS
The Tindale Oliver Team recognizes that being visible and
accessible to our clients is essential to developing and
maintaining strong and lasting relationships. As we have done
under current contracts with the Collier MPO and Collier
County, we will continue to maximize our contact with MPO/
County staff throughout the life of the Strategic Highway
Safety Plan project. We believe in operating as an extension of
staff and will be able to accomplish this through frequent
phone and electronic communication, on-site meetings, and
regular project updates. As demonstrated through our Quality
Assurance Approach in Tab 4, frequent and regular meeting
times are part of our communication on all projects.
At the project kick-off meeting, we will review the Project
Management Plan with the County. Review of the project
schedule will occur during scheduled coordination meetings to
ensure timely delivery of task deliverables.
Wally Blain, the Deputy Project Manager proposed for this
project, resides in Collier County, which will allow him to be on
site for coordination with MPO/County staff and other team
members located in Southwest Florida. Interfacing with key
staff and members of the project management team located
outside of Southwest Florida will occur primarily from Tindale
Oliver’s Tampa office as necessary for staff and project
coordination.
Office locations of key team members from which support will
be available from the Tindale Oliver Team include:
> Tindale Oliver (Tampa, Naples)
> The Valerin Group (Tampa)
Over the past 20 years, Tindale Oliver has supported the Collier
MPO, Collier County, and Collier Area Transit in numerous
areas, including impact fee studies and financial planning,
master mobility planning, transit and other multimodal
transportation planning, parks master planning, and crash
data management and analysis, among many others, with staff
located in Tampa and other offices. With the recent relocation
of Wally Blain to Collier County, the County can expect the
same level of dedication and responsiveness.
9.D.4
Packet Pg. 391 Attachment: 19-7562 Tindale Oliver Proposal (9249 : Recommendation to approve the Selection Committee’s ranking for SHSP)
9.D.4
Packet Pg. 392 Attachment: 19-7562 Tindale Oliver Proposal (9249 : Recommendation to approve the Selection Committee’s ranking for SHSP)
COLLIER MPO | Collier County Strategic Highway Safety Plan 6 - 1
Tab 6 – Recent, Current, and Projected Workloads of the Firm
Tindale Oliver uses a Project Staffing Plan for forecasting
monthly work loads that provides a detailed focus for a 90-day
time period and a planning-level analysis of 6-month and
1-year project obligations. This process helps to ensure, within
reason, that we can provide a consistent team for each current
and anticipated project with the appropriate skill sets and
experience levels to deliver a high-quality product at a good
value to the client.
Tindale Oliver has a Senior Staff Collaboration Committee
comprising members from our four planning disciplines
(Transportation, Transit, Public Finance, and Community
Planning & Design) to manage staff workload and availability.
The committee meets monthly to discuss project schedules,
staffing, and upcoming deadlines so project managers can
ensure that appropriate staff are available and assigned to
upcoming tasks and projects. This approach, combined with a
Project Management Plan (PMP), as discussed in Tab 4, allows
for the development of cross-disciplinary teams with the right
mix of expertise to meet task requirements and expectations.
Given the budget for the SHSP, Tindale Oliver anticipates that
approximately $21,500 will be allocated to Valerin to provide
public involvement support and assist in developing non-
infrastructure strategy recommendations. The remaining
$178,500 budgeted for this effort equates to approximately 5%
of our Traffic Safety and Metropolitan Planning teams’
combined annual production capacity.
CLOSEOUT OF RECENT WORK
As shown in the chart below, Tindale Oliver’s Multimodal and
Traffic Safety teams’ utilization rate has been trending
downward over the last six months with some reserve capacity
against a combined goal utilization of 70%. Our proposed
Project Manager and Deputy Project Manager have recently
completed or will soon substantially complete the following
projects:
Projects that have been or will soon be completed by proposed
Project Manager:
> City of Fort Lauderdale Beach Mobility Plan (March 2019)
> Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority Central Avenue BRT
30% Plans Review and Crash Analysis and Safety
Memorandum (March 2019)
> FDOT District 6 US 1 Multimodal Corridor Study (April 2019)
> FDOT District 7/Pasco County Pedestrian Safety Action Plan
(May 2019)
> FDOT District 7 Heights Mobility Study (July 2019)
Projects that have been or will soon be completed by proposed
Deputy Project Manager:
> Collier MPO Comprehensive Pathways Plan
(February 2019)
> Hillsborough MPO 2045 LRTP Needs Plan
(September 2019)
CURRENT WORKLOAD
The Multimodal Team’s current workload equates to
approximately 10 months of staff capacity. However, projects
such as the Broward MPO and Pasco County MPO LRTPs will
not be completed until (December 2019). In addition to these
two projects, major projects that the Multimodal Team is
currently working on include:
> FDOT District 7 – University Multimodal Center
> Broward MPO Title VI/LEP, DBE Goal and EJ Assessment
PROJECTED PROJECTS
Upcoming projects for which Tindale Oliver
has been selected but has not yet started
work include:
> Manatee County Mobility Plan and
Impact Fee Updates; $250,000 (April
2019–March 2020)
> Martin County MPO Mobility Plan and
Fee; $125,000 (April 2019–January
2020)
> Collier MPO Transit Impact
Assessment; $123,000 (April 2019–
December 2019)
> Sarasota Manatee MPO US 41 Corridor
Study; $100,000 (April 2019–October
2019)
> Task order assignments from FDOT
and MPO on-call contracts
9.D.4
Packet Pg. 393 Attachment: 19-7562 Tindale Oliver Proposal (9249 : Recommendation to approve the Selection Committee’s ranking for SHSP)
9.D.4
Packet Pg. 394 Attachment: 19-7562 Tindale Oliver Proposal (9249 : Recommendation to approve the Selection Committee’s ranking for SHSP)
COLLIER MPO | Collier County Strategic Highway Safety Plan 7 - 1
Tab 7 - Required Forms
In accordance with RPS No. 19-7562, the following forms are
included in this section:
> Tindale Oliver Board of Professional Engineers License
> Tindale Oliver Certificate of Corporate Status
> Vendor Checklist
> Conflict of Interest Affidavit
> Vendor Declaration Statement
> Immigration Affidavit Certification
> Vendor Substitute W-9
> Insurance and Bonding Requirements
> Federal Contract Provisions
Certification Regarding Debarment
Certification Regarding Lobbying
Conflict of Interest Certification
Anticipated Disadvantaged, Minority, Women or
Veteran Participation Statement
Bid Opportunity List
Acknowledgement of Terms, Conditions and
Grant Clauses
9.D.4
Packet Pg. 395 Attachment: 19-7562 Tindale Oliver Proposal (9249 : Recommendation to approve the Selection Committee’s ranking for SHSP)
Tab 7 - Required Forms
COLLIER MPO | Collier County Strategic Highway Safety Plan
9.D.4
Packet Pg. 396 Attachment: 19-7562 Tindale Oliver Proposal (9249 : Recommendation to approve the Selection Committee’s ranking for SHSP)
9.D.4Packet Pg. 397Attachment: 19-7562 Tindale Oliver Proposal (9249 : Recommendation to approve the Selection Committee’s ranking for SHSP)
9.D.4Packet Pg. 398Attachment: 19-7562 Tindale Oliver Proposal (9249 : Recommendation to approve the Selection Committee’s ranking for SHSP)
9.D.4Packet Pg. 399Attachment: 19-7562 Tindale Oliver Proposal (9249 : Recommendation to approve the Selection Committee’s ranking for SHSP)
9.D.4Packet Pg. 400Attachment: 19-7562 Tindale Oliver Proposal (9249 : Recommendation to approve the Selection Committee’s ranking for SHSP)
9.D.4Packet Pg. 401Attachment: 19-7562 Tindale Oliver Proposal (9249 : Recommendation to approve the Selection Committee’s ranking for SHSP)
9.D.4Packet Pg. 402Attachment: 19-7562 Tindale Oliver Proposal (9249 : Recommendation to approve the Selection Committee’s ranking for SHSP)
9.D.4Packet Pg. 403Attachment: 19-7562 Tindale Oliver Proposal (9249 : Recommendation to approve the Selection Committee’s ranking for SHSP)
9.D.4Packet Pg. 404Attachment: 19-7562 Tindale Oliver Proposal (9249 : Recommendation to approve the Selection Committee’s ranking for SHSP)
9.D.4Packet Pg. 405Attachment: 19-7562 Tindale Oliver Proposal (9249 : Recommendation to approve the Selection Committee’s ranking for SHSP)
9.D.4Packet Pg. 406Attachment: 19-7562 Tindale Oliver Proposal (9249 : Recommendation to approve the Selection Committee’s ranking for SHSP)
9.D.4Packet Pg. 407Attachment: 19-7562 Tindale Oliver Proposal (9249 : Recommendation to approve the Selection Committee’s ranking for SHSP)
9.D.4Packet Pg. 408Attachment: 19-7562 Tindale Oliver Proposal (9249 : Recommendation to approve the Selection Committee’s ranking for SHSP)
9.D.4Packet Pg. 409Attachment: 19-7562 Tindale Oliver Proposal (9249 : Recommendation to approve the Selection Committee’s ranking for SHSP)
9.D.4Packet Pg. 410Attachment: 19-7562 Tindale Oliver Proposal (9249 : Recommendation to approve the Selection Committee’s ranking for SHSP)
9.D.4
Packet Pg. 411 Attachment: 19-7562 Tindale Oliver Proposal (9249 : Recommendation to approve the Selection Committee’s ranking for SHSP)
06/14/2019
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Adopt Resolution Supporting Naples Pathways Coalition’s Paradise Coast Trail Vision
OBJECTIVE: To adopt a resolution supporting the Naples Pathways Coalition’s (NPC) Paradise Coast
Trail Vision.
CONSIDERATIONS: The NPC has requested an MPO resolution in support of their Paradise Coast
Trail Vision. The draft resolution references the recently adopted Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan
(BPMP) and supports the NPC Paradise Coast Trail Vision in so far as it is consistent with the BPM P.
The draft resolution, including a map prepared by the NPC showing 2 -mile wide study corridors is
included as Attachment 1. A map showing the NPC study corridors superimposed over the SUNTrail
and Spine Corridors map adopted in the BPMP is included in Attachment 2.
The NPC has prepared a brief presentation on the Paradise Coast Trail Vision to give to the Board, shown
in Attachment 3. The presentation is informative in that it addresses questions and comments received
from Board and advisory committee members thus far.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: The Citizen’s Advisory Committee and Bicycle and
Pedestrian Advisory Committee endorsed the resolution at their May meetings. The Technical Advisory
Committee (TAC) received the NPC presentation. Members commented that the vision map should
extend connections to Marco Island and Everglades City. The committee did not take formal action due to
lack of a quorum.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the Board adopt the attached resolution supporting Naples
Pathways Coalition’s Paradise Coast Vision.
Prepared By: Anne McLaughlin, MPO Director
ATTACHMENT(S)
1. Resolution and Paradise Coast Trail Map (PDF)
2. SUNTrail Alignments & Spine Pathway Corridors Map with Paradise Coast Trail Overlay
(PDF)
3. NPC Presentation on Paradise Coast Trail Vision (PDF)
9.E
Packet Pg. 412
06/14/2019
COLLIER COUNTY
Metropolitan Planning Organization
Item Number: 9.E
Doc ID: 9251
Item Summary: Adopt Resolution Supporting Naples Pathways Coalition’s Paradise Coast Trail
Vision
Meeting Date: 06/14/2019
Prepared by:
Title: – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Karen Intriago
06/06/2019 9:36 AM
Submitted by:
Title: Executive Director - MPO – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Anne McLaughlin
06/06/2019 9:36 AM
Approved By:
Review:
Metropolitan Planning Organization Brandy Otero MPO Analyst Review Completed 06/06/2019 10:24 AM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin MPO Executive Director Review Completed 06/06/2019 10:32 AM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin Meeting Pending 06/14/2019 9:00 AM
9.E
Packet Pg. 413
9.E.1
Packet Pg. 414 Attachment: Resolution and Paradise Coast Trail Map (9251 : Adopt Resolution Supporting Naples Pathways Coalition’s Paradise Coast Trail
9.E.1
Packet Pg. 415 Attachment: Resolution and Paradise Coast Trail Map (9251 : Adopt Resolution Supporting Naples Pathways Coalition’s Paradise Coast Trail
Immokalee
Ave Maria
GoldenGate
Lely
£¤29
£¤29
§¨¦75
Gulf of Mexico
£¤41
§¨¦75
BIG CYPRESSNATIONALPRESERVE
FLORIDA PANTHERNATIONALWILDLIFE REFUGE
CORKSCREWSWAMPSANCTUARY
COLLIER-SEMINOLESTATE PARK
FAKAHATCHEESTRAND PRESERVESTATE PARK
PICAYUNESTRAND STATEFOREST
ESTERO
BONITA SPRINGS
MARCO ISLAND
NAPLESOLD 41 NPIPER BLVDVANDERBILT DREVERGLADES BLVD SN OR T H R DRIDGE DRPELICAN BAY BLVDNORTHBROOKE DR5TH AVE S3R
D ST SGRE EN BLVD
GOLDEN GATE PKW Y
W IGG INS PASS R D
66TH ST SW9TH ST NARBOR BLVDTAYLOR RD44TH ST SWROCK RDBENTON RD
ISLANDWALK CIR
C E N T R A L A V ETAMIAMI TRL N6TH ST N8TH ST N13TH ST SW8TH ST S7 T H A V E N KRAPE RD5 T H A V E NTRAIL BLVDC
A
R
IC
A R
D QUARRY DR23RD ST SWB U R N H A M R D
7TH AVE NW
KINGS WAY16TH ST NELOGAN BLVD SCRAYTON RD8TH ST NE47TH AVE NE
WEST STRADIO RD
3RD AV E NW
MERRITT BLVDD AV IS BLV D
GO L DEN G AT E B LVD W FRIENDSHIP LN18TH AVE NE 40TH ST NEFRANGIPANI AVE
EST EY AVE
PL ATT RD
WILSON BLVD NSTRAND BLVDVINEYARDS BLVDPINE RIDGE RD
ALLEY92ND AVE N
SANTA BARBARA BLVDBECK BLVD
MILLER BLVD39TH ST SWDESOTO BLVD NLILAC LNEVERGLADES BLVD N32 N D AV E S WOAKES BLVDSOLL STWHITE LAKE BLVD DESOTO BLVD S16 T H AVE SW
SNAKE RD
PELICAN MARSH BLVD LOGAN BLVD N111TH AVE N
2 5 T H A V E N W
BONITA B EACH RD
VALEWOOD DRORANGE BLOSSOM DR
SMITH RDAIRPORT PULLING RD NCOLLIER BLVD68TH ST SW70TH ST SW60 T H AVE SELIVINGSTON RD N26TH AVE SE
VANDERBILT BEACH RD
SANCT UARY RD
INEZ RDLIM PKIN RD
MASSEY STGO L DEN G AT E B LVD ETWINEAGLES BLVDJU NG BLVD E
55 T H A V E S EREDHAWK LNLIVINGSTON RD S20 T H AVE SE
OIL W EL L RD
FREANCES ST48 T H AVE SEGOODLETTE-FRANK RD NTHE LNBAREFOOT BEACH BLVD25TH ST SW43RD AV E NE
NAOMI ST17TH ST SW41 ST AVE NE
21ST ST SW45TH AVE NE
24TH AVE NE
CR 85 8
27TH AVE NE
62ND AV E N E
54TH AVE NE
14TH AVE NE
66TH AVE NE
8TH AVE NE
10TH AVE SE
72ND AV E NE
58TH AVE NE
TOBIAS ST10TH AVE NW
11TH ST NW16TH AVE NW
O
IL WE
L
L
G
R
A
D
E
R
D
12TH ST NE22ND ST NE20TH ST NE6TH ST NE5TH ST NW24TH AVE NW
2ND ST NE3RD ST SWSHADY HOLLOW B LV D W
41 ST AVE NW
33RD AV E NW
16TH ST SERANDALL BLVDIMMOKALEE RDBLACKBURN RD I 75
Paradise Coast Trail
Legend
Paradise Coast Trail Conceptual Corridor
Collier County
Municipalities
Managed Lands/Open SpaceI
0 3 61.5 Miles
9.E.1
Packet Pg. 416 Attachment: Resolution and Paradise Coast Trail Map (9251 : Adopt Resolution Supporting Naples Pathways Coalition’s Paradise Coast Trail
SUNTrail Alignments and Spine Pathway Corridors
with Paradise Coast Trail Overlay
Paradise Coast Trail
Conceptual Corridor
9.E.2
Packet Pg. 417 Attachment: SUNTrail Alignments & Spine Pathway Corridors Map with Paradise Coast Trail Overlay (9251 : Adopt Resolution Supporting
Presentation to the
Collier MPO Board
June 14, 2019
9.E.3
Packet Pg. 418 Attachment: NPC Presentation on Paradise Coast Trail Vision (9251 : Adopt Resolution
Background -The Problem
•Florida continues to lead the nation in bicycle and pedestrian
fatalities
•Collier County -808 reported bicycle and pedestrian crashes
with 33 fatalities and 119 serious injuries (2011-2016)
9.E.3
Packet Pg. 419 Attachment: NPC Presentation on Paradise Coast Trail Vision (9251 : Adopt Resolution
Background -The Problem
Existing Collier County pathways are short and disconnected
The Gordon River Greenway has been an
outstanding example of a local multi-use
pathway that is enjoyed by many.
Unfortunately, it is only 4 miles long and not
connected to other pathways.
The Rich King Memorial Greenway
is another example of a popular
multi-use pathway. It is 3 miles in
length and also not connected to
other pathways.
9.E.3
Packet Pg. 420 Attachment: NPC Presentation on Paradise Coast Trail Vision (9251 : Adopt Resolution
The NPC Vision for the Paradise Coast Trail
•A premier 70-mile multi-use trail
connecting Naples, Golden Gate,
Immokalee, Ave Maria and other
areas
•A safe, separated 12’ wide
pathway that will significantly
advance bicycling and walking
opportunities
9.E.3
Packet Pg. 421 Attachment: NPC Presentation on Paradise Coast Trail Vision (9251 : Adopt Resolution
Paradise Coast Trail
Conceptual Corridor
Will serve as a major corridor in
Collier County’s trail network
9.E.3
Packet Pg. 422 Attachment: NPC Presentation on Paradise Coast Trail Vision (9251 : Adopt Resolution
Why the Paradise Coast Trail?
Advances the Collier MPO
Bicycle and Pedestrian Master
Plan
Advances the FDOT
Shared-use Nonmotorized
(SUN) Trail Network
Advances the FDEP
Statewide Priority Trail
Network
9.E.3
Packet Pg. 423 Attachment: NPC Presentation on Paradise Coast Trail Vision (9251 : Adopt Resolution
Why the Paradise Coast Trail?
Recreation Benefits
•61% of Floridians say outdoor
recreation is very important
in their lives
•Walking, jogging and bicycling –the
outdoor recreation activities desired
most
9.E.3
Packet Pg. 424 Attachment: NPC Presentation on Paradise Coast Trail Vision (9251 : Adopt Resolution
Why the Paradise Coast Trail?
•Trails help to advance the
Blue Zones Project to
improve well-being and health
in SW Florida
Health Benefits
•Trails are promoted as a public
health strategy by the
US Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention
9.E.3
Packet Pg. 425 Attachment: NPC Presentation on Paradise Coast Trail Vision (9251 : Adopt Resolution
Why the Paradise Coast Trail?
Economic Benefits
The impact of…
West Orange Trail for Winter Garden is estimated at $3.6M annually
Three East Central Florida trails is estimated at $42.6M regionally
Source: Visit Florida
9.E.3
Packet Pg. 426 Attachment: NPC Presentation on Paradise Coast Trail Vision (9251 : Adopt Resolution
Why the Paradise Coast Trail?
Economic Benefits
Trailside Businesses
9.E.3
Packet Pg. 427 Attachment: NPC Presentation on Paradise Coast Trail Vision (9251 : Adopt Resolution
Why the Paradise Coast Trail?
Community Benefits
•National Association of
Homebuilders often cites trails
as one of the most desired
community amenities
•Developers seek opportunities
to connect to regional trail
systems
9.E.3
Packet Pg. 428 Attachment: NPC Presentation on Paradise Coast Trail Vision (9251 : Adopt Resolution
Overview of the Process
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENT STUDY
(PD&E)
VISION
FEASIBILITY STUDY
CONSTRUCTION
DESIGN
9.E.3
Packet Pg. 429 Attachment: NPC Presentation on Paradise Coast Trail Vision (9251 : Adopt Resolution
Overview of the Process
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENT STUDY
(PD&E)
VISION
FEASIBILITY STUDY
CONSTRUCTION
DESIGN
9.E.3
Packet Pg. 430 Attachment: NPC Presentation on Paradise Coast Trail Vision (9251 : Adopt Resolution
Next Major Step
•Gather critical information
•Understand right-of-way
opportunities
•Identify potential corridors
•Engage the community
•Lay foundation for future
work
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENT STUDY
(PD&E)
VISION
FEASIBILITY STUDY
CONSTRUCTION
DESIGN
9.E.3
Packet Pg. 431 Attachment: NPC Presentation on Paradise Coast Trail Vision (9251 : Adopt Resolution
Why a Resolution?
•Expresses support for the
Vision
•Positions the project for the
Feasibility Study
•Ensures NPC is acting in
coordination with the
process
•Lays foundation for long-
term project success
9.E.3
Packet Pg. 432 Attachment: NPC Presentation on Paradise Coast Trail Vision (9251 : Adopt Resolution
Near-Term Steps
•Resolutions
•NPC will continue
fundraising to support
funding for the Feasibility
Study
•Continued stakeholder
outreach
•PCT planning kickoff event
9.E.3
Packet Pg. 433 Attachment: NPC Presentation on Paradise Coast Trail Vision (9251 : Adopt Resolution
Thank You!9.E.3
Packet Pg. 434 Attachment: NPC Presentation on Paradise Coast Trail Vision (9251 : Adopt Resolution
06/14/2019
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Joint MPO, FDOT and Local Agency Presentation on Project Programming
OBJECTIVE: To receive a joint MPO, FDOT and Local Agency presentation on project programming.
CONSIDERATIONS: During a discussion on the draft 2019 Priority Projects at the May meeting,
several Board members requested a presentation on project programming similar to one that FDOT and
MPO staff gave on December 8, 2017, with additional information provided by local agency staff.
The MPO/FDOT presentation has been updated. Collier County and City of Naples staff will augment the
presentation by describing their agency’s project identification and selection process. (City of Marco
Island staff may also present information but have not yet responded to the invitation to d o so. The
presentation is included as Attachment 1.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: n/a.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the Board receive a joint MPO, FDOT and Local Agency
presentation on project programming.
Prepared By: Anne McLaughlin, MPO Director
ATTACHMENT(S)
1. How Transportation Projects are Programmed - Presentation (PDF)
10.A
Packet Pg. 435
06/14/2019
COLLIER COUNTY
Metropolitan Planning Organization
Item Number: 10.A
Doc ID: 9259
Item Summary: Joint MPO, FDOT and Local Agency Presentation on Project Programming
Meeting Date: 06/14/2019
Prepared by:
Title: – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Karen Intriago
06/06/2019 12:43 PM
Submitted by:
Title: Executive Director - MPO – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Anne McLaughlin
06/06/2019 12:43 PM
Approved By:
Review:
Metropolitan Planning Organization Brandy Otero MPO Analyst Review Completed 06/06/2019 12:55 PM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin MPO Executive Director Review Completed 06/06/2019 1:07 PM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin Meeting Pending 06/14/2019 9:00 AM
10.A
Packet Pg. 436
COLLIER MPO, FDOT, COLLIER COUNTY,
CITY OF NAPLES PRESENTATION
Collier MPO Board Meeting June 14, 2019
10.A.1
Packet Pg. 437 Attachment: How Transportation Projects are Programmed - Presentation (9259 : Joint
➢Purpose
➢Introductions
➢MPO -Major Steps in Project Programming
1.Long Range Transportation Plan –Cost Feasible 2.Project Priorities3.FDOT Draft Tentative & Final Work Program4.MPO TIP5.FDOT STIP
➢FDOT
➢City of Naples
➢Collier County
10.A.1
Packet Pg. 438 Attachment: How Transportation Projects are Programmed - Presentation (9259 : Joint
Establishes Policy and Direction
❑Vision & Mission Statement
❑Committee Appointments
❑Executive Director’s Annual
Report & Evaluation
❑UPWP, LRTP, Plans & Studies,
❑Policies, Resolutions, Interagency Agreements, Committee Bylaws
❑TIP Authority Under Federal Laws
❑Programming TMA SU Funds –According to LRTP -CFP, Allocation Policy, Approving Project Priorities
10.A.1
Packet Pg. 439 Attachment: How Transportation Projects are Programmed - Presentation (9259 : Joint
LRTP CFP
Project
Priorities
Work
Program
TIP
10.A.1
Packet Pg. 440 Attachment: How Transportation Projects are Programmed - Presentation (9259 : Joint
2040 LRTP p 6-3
10.A.1
Packet Pg. 441 Attachment: How Transportation Projects are Programmed - Presentation (9259 : Joint
2040 LRTP Table 6-1 p 6-3
10.A.1
Packet Pg. 442 Attachment: How Transportation Projects are Programmed - Presentation (9259 : Joint
Highway
SU
Transit
TRIP
•CFP Tables & Maps
•Specific Projects
•CFP Program Funds
•Needs & Established
Process
•CFP Program Funds
•Needs and TDP
•Regional Transportation
Network 50/50 match
•Regional Priorities
10.A.1
Packet Pg. 443 Attachment: How Transportation Projects are Programmed - Presentation (9259 : Joint
What about Safety?
2040 LRTP, Appendix A, Revenue Forecasts, Table 8 p 9
“Safety includes the Highway Safety Improvement
Program, the Highway Safety Grant Program,
Bicycle/Pedestrian Safety activities, the Industrial
Safety Program, and general safety issues on a
Department-wide basis.”
Total Statewide Revenue Forecast for 2040 LRTP (27
Years): $3,378 million Statewide
10.A.1
Packet Pg. 444 Attachment: How Transportation Projects are Programmed - Presentation (9259 : Joint
Annual Schedule
JANUARY TO JUNE
1.FDOT distributes Final Tentative 5-Year Work Program (WP)
2.MPO staff incorporates into new TIP
3.Board adopts new TIP and new Project Priorities at June meeting
JULY TO DECEMBER
1.FDOT distributes adopted Work Program
2.FDOT starts developing new 5th Year based on newly adopted MPO
Priorities
3.Committees and Board review Draft Tentative 5-Year Work Program
4.New Project Priorities Submitted by Technical Staff & Reviewed by
Committees
10.A.1
Packet Pg. 445 Attachment: How Transportation Projects are Programmed - Presentation (9259 : Joint
Plans & Programming Details…
June 14, 2019
Presented by:
Victoria Peters, Community Liaison
District One
10.A.1
Packet Pg. 446 Attachment: How Transportation Projects are Programmed - Presentation (9259 : Joint
Mission & Vision
11
OUR MISSION
The department will provide a safe transportation system that ensures the mobility of people and goods, enhances economic prosperity and preserves the quality of our environment and communities.
OUR VISION
Serving the people of Florida by delivering a transportation system that is fatality and congestion free.
10.A.1
Packet Pg. 447 Attachment: How Transportation Projects are Programmed - Presentation (9259 : Joint
RoadMap
❑FDOT Plans… an Overview
❑Fund Allocations & Project Priorities
❑Work Program Cycle & Development
❑District One & Your Community
12
10.A.1
Packet Pg. 448 Attachment: How Transportation Projects are Programmed - Presentation (9259 : Joint
FDOT Plans and Priorities -FTP
13
Florida Transportation Plan (FTP)
•7 Goal Areas of the FTP:
Quality Places
Infrastructure
Mobility (Implement with SIS & other programs (i.e.
Complete Streets)
Safety and Security
Transportation Choices
Economic Competitiveness
Environment and Energy
FDOT tries to accomplish these goals within
the statutory requirements funding flexibility
provided in state and federal statutes
10.A.1
Packet Pg. 449 Attachment: How Transportation Projects are Programmed - Presentation (9259 : Joint
FDOT Plans & Priorities –Strategic
Intermodal System (SIS)
14
Statewide
Network of
Multimodal
Transportation
Facilities
•Critical to Florida's
economy and mobility
•Most significant for
interregional, interstate
and international
movement of people
and freight
•Highest priority for
transportation capacity
investments
10.A.1
Packet Pg. 450 Attachment: How Transportation Projects are Programmed - Presentation (9259 : Joint
Strategic Intermodal System in Collier County
15
FDOT Plans & Priorities 10.A.1
Packet Pg. 451 Attachment: How Transportation Projects are Programmed - Presentation (9259 : Joint
FDOT Plans & Priorities
Strategic Intermodal System (SIS)
16
10.A.1
Packet Pg. 452 Attachment: How Transportation Projects are Programmed - Presentation (9259 : Joint
FDOT Plans & Priorities –District 1
Freight Mobility & Trade Plan (FMTP)
State FMTP Update in 2019 In Progress
17
10.A.1
Packet Pg. 453 Attachment: How Transportation Projects are Programmed - Presentation (9259 : Joint
FDOT Plans & Priorities –District 1
Freight Mobility & Trade Plan (FMTP)
18
10.A.1
Packet Pg. 454 Attachment: How Transportation Projects are Programmed - Presentation (9259 : Joint
Fund Allocation Process
Funding Priorities:
Safety –Overriding Part of Everything the
Department Does
❖Preserve our Investments –need based for Maintaining
existing Infrastructure (Bridges, Resurfacing & Maintenance)
❖Comply with Statutory requirements –Many Diff’t Formulas
❖Transportation System Capacity–remaining resources (SIS)
19
10.A.1
Packet Pg. 455 Attachment: How Transportation Projects are Programmed - Presentation (9259 : Joint
Fund Allocation Process
Allocation of funds
»Annual process
»Starts with revenue
»Statutory requirements
Selection of projects
»MPO priorities
»Strategic priorities
»Statutory requirements
20
10.A.1
Packet Pg. 456 Attachment: How Transportation Projects are Programmed - Presentation (9259 : Joint
Matching Projects to Funding
21
10.A.1
Packet Pg. 457 Attachment: How Transportation Projects are Programmed - Presentation (9259 : Joint
Work Program Cycle
22
10.A.1
Packet Pg. 458 Attachment: How Transportation Projects are Programmed - Presentation (9259 : Joint
Five Year Work Program Development
FY
2019/20
FY
2020/21
FY
2021/22
FY
2022/23
FY
2023/24
Current
5TH Year
Tentative
Five Year Work Program (adopted 7/1/19)
10.A.1
Packet Pg. 459 Attachment: How Transportation Projects are Programmed - Presentation (9259 : Joint
Five Year Work Program Development
FY
2019/20
FY
2020/21
FY
2021/22
FY
2022/23
FY
2023/24
FY
2024/25
Next
Cycle’s
New
5TH Year
Draft
Tentative
Five Year Draft Tentative Work Program
10.A.1
Packet Pg. 460 Attachment: How Transportation Projects are Programmed - Presentation (9259 : Joint
FDOT’s Relationship with Your Community
•District One: Secretary LK Nandam’s
Leadership and Direction…
•Strong relationships
•Working with the Community
•Proactive Communication
•Always do the right thing
25
10.A.1
Packet Pg. 461 Attachment: How Transportation Projects are Programmed - Presentation (9259 : Joint
District One Contact Info Related To This
Presentation
D1 Liaison/Planning Specialist III
Victoria Peters
Southwest Area Office (SWAO)
10041 Daniels Parkway, Ft Myers FL
(239) 225-1974
Victoria.Peters@dot.state.fl.us
D1 Strategic Intermodal Systems (SIS) Coordinator/Community Planning
Coordinator
Sarah Catala
Southwest Area Office (SWAO)
10041 Daniels Parkway, Ft Myers FL
(239) 225-1981
Sarah.Catala@dot.state.fl.us
D1 Freight & Seaport Coordinator
Keith Robbins
FDOT District One, Bartow
(863) 519-2913
Keith.Robbins@dot.state.fl.us
26
10.A.1
Packet Pg. 462 Attachment: How Transportation Projects are Programmed - Presentation (9259 : Joint
Florida Department of Transportation
THANK YOU!
QUESTIONS & COMMENTS…
27
10.A.1
Packet Pg. 463 Attachment: How Transportation Projects are Programmed - Presentation (9259 : Joint
10.A.1
Packet Pg. 464 Attachment: How Transportation Projects are Programmed - Presentation (9259 : Joint
10.A.1
Packet Pg. 465 Attachment: How Transportation Projects are Programmed - Presentation (9259 : Joint
10.A.1
Packet Pg. 466 Attachment: How Transportation Projects are Programmed - Presentation (9259 : Joint
10.A.1
Packet Pg. 467 Attachment: How Transportation Projects are Programmed - Presentation (9259 : Joint
06/14/2019
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
New Policies Regarding Project Prioritization and Programming
OBJECTIVE: To receive a report on the development of new policies regarding project prioritization
and programming.
CONSIDERATIONS: MPO staff has held discussions with the Technical, Citizens and Bicycle and
Pedestrian Advisory Committees (TAC, CAC, BPAC) on two areas of concern involving project
prioritization and programming:
1. Expanding project priorities to include safety, transit and highway capacity enhancement pro jects
2. Developing a mechanism to reconfirm local governing body support for projects prior to
expenditure of any state or federal funds.
The committees expressed support for expanding project priorities to include safety projects. The
committees noted that transit and highway expansion projects are already addressed under current
practices.
The discussion regarding reconfirming support for projects prior to expenditure of funds included the
following proposals:
▪ Instituting a requirement to reimburse FDOT for expenditures incurred; restore funding to MPO’s
SU “Box”
▪ Shortening the time frame for programming projects out to three years instead of five
▪ Establishing a formal or informal reconfirmation of local agency support for a project during the
fiscal year prior to the year the project is programmed to begin
▪ Requiring an additional public comment period followed by reconfirmation of local agency
support prior to expending any public funds on the project
▪ Requiring a resolution adopted by the local government reconfirming support for a project the
year prior to the year of expenditure in the TIP
MPO staff and advisory committee members discussed the difficulty of instituting a reimbursement
requirement and were divided over whether such a punitive measure was called for, whether instituting a
formal reconfirmation via resolution without any financial penalty attached would be effective, and at
what step in the process reconfirming support for a project should occur.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: Regarding expanding project priorities, CAC members
recommended including safety projects and allowing as much flexibility as possible within reason; TAC
members supported adding safety projects, noting that transit and highway capacity projects are already
addressed; BPAC supported adding bike ped safety projects only.
Regarding reconfirming support for projects prior to expending public funds, TAC members identified
potential problems with each of the options considered; CAC members thought reconfirmation of su pport
was a good idea but were not clear on the best way to accomplish this; BPAC members were in support of
local reconfirmation of a project prior to any financial expenditures, and in favor of not allowing an
agency/jurisdiction who cancelled a project to move the funds to another project within that
agency/jurisdiction.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Expand the lists of prioritized projects to include safety projects,
while maintaining the current 40/40/20 split over a 5-year period for budgeting purposes. Require
adoption of a resolution reconfirming support of a project by the local government the year prior to the
year of expenditure in the TIP.
10.B
Packet Pg. 468
06/14/2019
Prepared By: Anne McLaughlin, MPO Director
10.B
Packet Pg. 469
06/14/2019
COLLIER COUNTY
Metropolitan Planning Organization
Item Number: 10.B
Doc ID: 9260
Item Summary: New Policies Regarding Project Prioritization and Programming
Meeting Date: 06/14/2019
Prepared by:
Title: – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Karen Intriago
06/06/2019 12:48 PM
Submitted by:
Title: Executive Director - MPO – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Anne McLaughlin
06/06/2019 12:48 PM
Approved By:
Review:
Metropolitan Planning Organization Brandy Otero MPO Analyst Review Completed 06/06/2019 1:44 PM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin MPO Executive Director Review Completed 06/06/2019 1:46 PM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin Meeting Pending 06/14/2019 9:00 AM
10.B
Packet Pg. 470
06/14/2019
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Joint FDOT Presentation on Old US 41 PD&E Study
OBJECTIVE: To receive a presentation from FDOT on the Old US 41 PD&E Study
CONSIDERATIONS: The Old US 41 Project Development and Environmental (PD&E) Study will
analyze safety, Complete Streets, and capacity improvement alternatives between US 41 and Bonita
Beach Road in order to relieve existing congestion and accommodate future travel demand resulting from
projected population and employment growth in the area. Project goals include in creasing roadway safety,
providing accommodation for pedestrians and cyclists, and facilitating the movement of people and
freight. The project number in the Collier MPO FY19 -23 TIP is 4351101. The construction phase has not
yet been programmed. The FDOT presentation is included in Attachment 1.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: n/a.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the Board receive a presentation from FDOT on the Old US 41
PD&E Study.
Prepared By: Anne McLaughlin, MPO Director
ATTACHMENT(S)
1. FDOT presentation on Old US 41 PD&E Study (PDF)
10.C
Packet Pg. 471
06/14/2019
COLLIER COUNTY
Metropolitan Planning Organization
Item Number: 10.C
Doc ID: 9257
Item Summary: Joint FDOT Presentation on Old US 41 PD&E Study
Meeting Date: 06/14/2019
Prepared by:
Title: – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Karen Intriago
06/06/2019 11:26 AM
Submitted by:
Title: Executive Director - MPO – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Anne McLaughlin
06/06/2019 11:26 AM
Approved By:
Review:
Metropolitan Planning Organization Brandy Otero MPO Analyst Review Completed 06/06/2019 11:37 AM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin MPO Executive Director Review Completed 06/06/2019 11:41 AM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin Meeting Pending 06/14/2019 9:00 AM
10.C
Packet Pg. 472
CR 887 (Old US 41)
PD&E Study
Public Officials Kick-off
Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization
FPID: 435110-1-22-01 & 435347-1-22-01
FAP: D119 028 B & D119 027 B
6/14/2019
10.C.1
Packet Pg. 473 Attachment: FDOT presentation on Old US 41 PD&E Study (9257 : Joint FDOT
Project Location
•Collier County:
•US 41 to Lee County Line
•Lee County/City of Bonita Springs
•Collier County Line to Bonita Beach
Road
10.C.1
Packet Pg. 474 Attachment: FDOT presentation on Old US 41 PD&E Study (9257 : Joint FDOT
Project Info
•Collier County:
•Desires
•Capacity
•Pedestrian/bicycle safety
•Freight
•Lee County/City of Bonita Springs
•Desires
•Complete streets
•Connectivity
•Redevelopment
10.C.1
Packet Pg. 475 Attachment: FDOT presentation on Old US 41 PD&E Study (9257 : Joint FDOT
Activities To Date
•Kick-off with FDOT staff
•Kick-off with County and City Staff
10.C.1
Packet Pg. 476 Attachment: FDOT presentation on Old US 41 PD&E Study (9257 : Joint FDOT
Agency Coordination Schedule
Debrief Public
Meeting
Before Public
Hearing
Debrief Public
Hearing
Presentation to
MPO/BOCC/City
Council
Public
Hearing
Kickoff with
MPO/BOCC/City
Council
Concept
Development
Before Public
Meeting
Presentation to
MPO/BOCC/City
Council
Alternatives Public
Information
Meeting
SPRING 2020
WINTER 2020
10.C.1
Packet Pg. 477 Attachment: FDOT presentation on Old US 41 PD&E Study (9257 : Joint FDOT
Public Involvement Schedule
Spring Summer Fall Winter
2019
Spring Summer Fall Winter Spring
2020
Study Begins
Newsletters
Public Meetings/
Hearing
Local Government
Coordination
Meetings
MPO
Presentations
Study Approval
2021
10.C.1
Packet Pg. 478 Attachment: FDOT presentation on Old US 41 PD&E Study (9257 : Joint FDOT
Next Steps
•Public Kick-off
•Property Owner Newsletter 1
•Public Officials and Interested Parties
Email
•Coordination with further interested
parties and residential communities
•Develop Typical Sections and
Alternatives
10.C.1
Packet Pg. 479 Attachment: FDOT presentation on Old US 41 PD&E Study (9257 : Joint FDOT
Thank
you
Steven A. Andrews
FDOT Project Manager
863 519 2270
Steven.Andrews@dot.state.fl.us
www.swflroads.com/
oldus41/pdestudy
10.C.1
Packet Pg. 480 Attachment: FDOT presentation on Old US 41 PD&E Study (9257 : Joint FDOT
06/14/2019
COLLIER COUNTY
Metropolitan Planning Organization
Item Number: 13.A
Item Summary: Next Meeting Date - September 13, 2019 - 9:00 a.m. Board of County
Commissioners Chambers, 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, FL 34112
Meeting Date: 06/14/2019
Prepared by:
Title: – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Karen Intriago
06/06/2019 8:46 AM
Submitted by:
Title: Executive Director - MPO – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Anne McLaughlin
06/06/2019 8:46 AM
Approved By:
Review:
Metropolitan Planning Organization Brandy Otero MPO Analyst Review Completed 06/06/2019 8:59 AM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin MPO Executive Director Review Completed 06/06/2019 9:09 AM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin Meeting Pending 06/14/2019 9:00 AM
13.A
Packet Pg. 481