Agenda 05/26/2009 Item #17B
Agenda Item No. 178
May 26,2009
Page 1 of 159
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
PUDA-2008-AR-13792, Naples Botanical Garden, Inc, and the Florida Gulf Coast
University Foundation, Inc" represented by R, Bruce Anderson of Roetzel and Andress
LPA; and Margaret Perry, AICP, of Wilson Miller, Inc" are requesting an Amendment to
Ordinance Number 03-29, The Naples Botanical Garden Planned Unit Development
(PUD), by amending Section 4.14, Design Guidelines; Section 6,2, Development
Parameters; Section 6.4, Permitted Uses and Structures to allow interim or temporary
structures; Section 6,5 Development Standards so the interim or temporary structures have
a greater setback distance than the principal structures; revisions to Section 7,2,
Transportation Commitments of the PUD Document; and adding Section 7,6 to provide
Deviations from the Land Development Code (LDC), The subject property (171.2::1: acres) is
located at 4820 Bayshore Drive at the southwest corner of the intersection of Bayshore
Drive and Thomasson Drive, in Section 23, Township 50 South, Range 25 East, Collier
County, Florida,
OBJECTIVE:
To have the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) consider an amendment to the Naples
Botanical Gardens PUD to revise the design guidelines, development parameters, permitted uses,
transportation commitments and add a section for deviations from the Land Development Code
(LDC), and ensure the project is in hannony with all the applicable codes and regulations in
order to ensure that the community's interests are maintained.
CONSIDERATIONS:
The petitioner is proposing to amend five (5) sections of the Naples Botanical Gardens PUD and
to add a section for deviations from the LDC. The amendment to Section 4.14, Design
Guidelines, provides an alternative compliance process for architectural and design standards as
outlined in Section 5.05.08 of the LDC, except for the proposed interim or temporary structures
and maintenance structures, which will not require architectural and design standard review.
The amendment to Section 6.2, Development Parameters, will require the proposed interim or
temporary structures to be approved through the site development plan process to ensure the
developer will comply with the Collier County Building Code and Americans with Disabilities
Act (ADA) regulations. The amendment to Section 6.4, Pennitted Uses and Structures, is to
allow interim or temporary structures and to set time limits on the structures for an initial period
of three (3) years. If needed, the applicant can request for an extension of the interim or
temporary structures beyond the three (3) years administratively utilizing the insubstantial
change to the approved SDP. Certificates of occupancy for a pern1anent structure will not be
issued until the interim or temporary structure housing a particular use is removed from the site.
The amendment to Section 6.5, Development Standards, is to guarantee the intelim or temporary
structures will have a greater setback distance than the principal structures. As well, the
developer is requesting revisions to Section 7.2, Transpoltation Commitments, of the PUD
PUDA-2008-AR-13792
April 30, 2009
Page 1 of (i
Agenda Item No. 178
May 26, 2009
Page 2 of 159
Document. In addition to the amendments listed above, the developer requests to add Section
7.6, which will permit Deviations from Section's 5.03.02, and Section 5.05.08 of the LDC.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The PUD amendment by and of itself will have no fiscal impact on Collier County. There is no
guarantee that the project, at build out, will maximize its authorized level of development,
however, if the PUD rezone is approved, a portion of the land could be developed and the new
development will result in an impact on Collier County public facilities,
The County collects impact fees prior to the issuance of building permits to help offset the
impacts of each new development on public facilities. These impact fees are used to fund
projects identified in the Capital Improvement Element of the Growth Management Plan as
needed to maintain adopted Level of Service (LOS) for public facilities. Additionally, in order
to meet the requirements of concurrency management, the developer of every local development
order approved by Collier County is required to pay 50 percent of the estimated Transportation
Impact Fees associated with the project. Other fees collected prior to issuance of a building
permit include building permit review fees and utility fees associated with connecting to the
County's water and sewer system. Finally, additional revenue is generated by application of ad
valorem tax rates, and that revenue is directly related to the value of the improvements. Please
note that impact fees and taxes collected were not included in the criteria used by staff and the
Planning Commission to analyze this petition.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) IMPACT:
Future Land Use Element (FLUE): The subject property is located within the Urban
Designated Area (Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict and
Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Overlay), and is within the Coastal High Hazard
i\rea as identified on the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) of the GrO\vth Management Plan
(GMP). This district is intended to accommodate a variety of residential and non-residential uses
including parks, open space, recreational uses and community facilities.
The Naples Botanical Garden PUD is approved for recreational and open space uses, and
accessory commercial uses, which are consistent with those allowed in the Urban Coastal Fringe.
Based upon the above analysis, Comprehensive Planning staff finds the proposed PUD
amendment consistent with the FLUE.
Transportation Element: Transportation Planning staff have reviewed the petition and has
determined that the proposed amendment does not present an additional impact on the adjacent
roadway network. As such, the road\vay network has sufficient capacity to accommodate this
project within the five (5) year planning period, and staff recommends that this project be found
consistent with Policies 5.1 and 5.2 of the Transportation Element of the GMP.
The proposed changes to the PUD commitments have been reviewed for consistency with
conceptual intersection improvements that have been evaluated by the Bayshore Community
Redevelopment Agency (eRA) "Bayshore Gateway Triangle Study." Staff has agreed that the
PUDA-2008-AR-13792
April 30, 2009
Page 201'6
/\genda Item r~o. 1 iB
f\1ay 26, 2009
Paoe 3 of 159
turn lane requirements stated in the Naples Botanical Garden's PUD are not currently required
and would constitute greater than the Naples Botanical Garden's proportionate share towards
intersection improvements.
Transportation Planning staff is also recommending approval of the sidewalk provisions set forth
in Section 7.2 of the PUD document. These provisions will provide a sidewalk along the length
of the Naples Botanical Gardens property on Thomasson Drive and along Bayshore Drive from
Thomasson Drive to the out parcel located on the west side of Bayshore Drive. The developer
shall provide a payment in lieu for the un-built 2,280 linear feet of sidewalks along Hamilton
Avenue, and for the un-built 845 linear feet of sidewalk along the west side of Bayshore Drive
from the out parcel opposite Republic Drive to the preserve area. This payment in lieu will be
used for sidewalk improvements along Bayshore Drive as part of the Bayshore Drive South
improvement project.
ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES:
Environmental Services staff have reviewed this application and have found that the amendment
did not affect the previously approved preserve locations of the PUD. For that reason, the PUD
remains compliant with the Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME), GMP and
LDC.
ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL (EAC) RECOMMENDATION:
Since the subject site has already been developed, the applicants were not required to submit an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for this petition. As a result, they were not required to
have a hearing before the EAC.
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION (CCpe) RECOMMENDATION:
The CCPC heard petition PUDA-2008-AR-13792 on April 2, 2009, and by a vote of 8-0
recommended to forward this petition to the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) with a
recommendation of approval subject to the foIIov.,ring conditions which have been incorporated
into the PUD document:
1. Revise Section 6.4, of the proposed PUD document to remove the language "described
above in I -6" that appears in Number seven (7) of the Principal Uses.
2. Accept the new transportation language as read into the record (see attachment 1), and as
provided in the attached PUD Ordinance.
3. Accept staffrecommendations.
4. Revise Sections 4.14.B, and 7.5.M of thc PUD document to keep the "overflow park
parking" language that was proposed to be eliminated.
5. Include the words" innovative design" in Section 4.l4.A of the proposed PUD document.
6. Include the word "black" in front of the words chain link fence in Section 7.63 of the
proposed PUD document.
7. Revise Section 4.14, of the proposed PUD document to remove the last sentence, "to
compensate f(x deviating from the Architectural and Site Design Standards of the LDC."
PUDA-200R-AR-] 3792
April 30, 2009
Page 3 of 6
item No. 78
May 26.2 09
Page 4 of 59
8. Revise Section 6.2, of the proposed PUD document to remove the sentence "Interim or
temporary structures will comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and
the Collier County Building Code."
9. Revise Section 6.4.7, of the proposed PUD document to allow only two three-year
administrative approvals for extension of the interim or temporary structures and if the
applicant needs another extension, they will be required to go before the BCC public
process.
Because the CCPC approval recommendation was unanimous and no letters of objection have
been received, this petition has heen placed on the Summary Agenda.
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS:
This is an amendment to the existing Naples Botanical Garden PUD (Ordinance No. 03-29, as
amended) which proposes to amend the following: Cover page; Sections 4.14; 6.2; 6.4; 6.5; 7.2;
and add a Section 7.6 to provide for deviations from the Land Development Code. This proposed
amendment is quasi-judicial in nature kmd as such requires ex parte disclosure. As such the
burden falls upon the applicant for the amendment to prove that the proposal is consistent with
all of the criteria set forth below. The burden then shifts to the Board of County Commissioners
(BCe), should it consider denial, that such denial is not arbitrary, discriminatory or
unreasonable. This would be accomplished by finding that the amendment does not meet one or
more of the listed criteria.
Criteria for pun Rezones
Ask yourself the following questions, The answers assi.'i't you in making a determination for
approval or 110t.
1. Consider: The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed
in relation to physical characteristics of the land, sun'ounding areas, traffic and access,
drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities.
2. Is there an adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of agreements,
contract, or other instruments or for amendments in those proposed, pm1icularly as they
may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and
maintenance of such areas and facilities that are !lot to be provided or maintained at
public expense? Findings WId recommendations of {his Zvpe shall he 111ade ()!I(V afier
consultation liith the COllnty Attorney.
3. Consider: Confonnity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives and policies of
the Growth Management Plan.
4. Consider: The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions
may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and
buffering and screening requirements.
PUDA-2008-AR-13792
April 30. 2009
Page 4 01'6
It'2m No. 78
rilay 20U9
Page 5 of 159
5. Is there an adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the
development?
6. Consider: The timing or sequence of development (as proposed) for the purpose of
assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private.
7. Consider: The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate
expanSIOn.
8. Consider: Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such
regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications are
justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of
such regulations.
9. Will the proposed change be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies and future
land use map and the elements of the Growth Management Plan?
] o. Will the proposed PUD Rezone be appropriate considering the existing land use pattern?
11. Would the requested PUD Rezone result in the possible creation of an isolated district
unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts?
12. Consider: Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn III relation to
existing conditions on the property proposed for change.
13. Consider: Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed
amendment necessary.
] 4. Will the proposed change adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood?
15. Will the proposed change create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types
of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or
projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the
development, or otherwise affect public s({fdy?
J 6. Will the proposed change create a drainage problem?
17. Will the proposed change seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas?
18. Will the proposed change adversely affect propeliy values in the adjacent area?
19. Will the proposed change be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent
property in accordance with existing regulations?
20. Consider: Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant (~lgpecial privilege to an
individual owner as contrasted with the pubiic welfare.
PUDA-200g-AR-13792
April 30, 2009
Page 5 of6
Agenda Item No. 178
May 26, 2009
Page 6 of 159
21. Are there substantial reasons why the property cannot ("reasonably") be used In
accordance with existing zoning? (a "core" question.. .)
22. Is the change suggested out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the county?
23. Consider: Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the
proposed use in districts already permitting such use.
24. Consider: The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration
which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential
uses under the proposed zoning classification.
25. Consider: The impact of development resulting from the proposed PUD rezone on the
availability of adequate public.flldlWes and services consistent with the levels of service
adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented
through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance [Code ch.l 06, art.II], as
amended.
26. Are there other factors, standards, or criteria relating to the PUD rezone request that the
Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public
health, safety, and welfare?
The BCe must base its decision upon the competent, substantial evidence presented by the
written materials supplied to it, including but not limited to the Staff Report, Executive
Summary, maps, studies, letters from interested persons and the oral testimony presented at the
BCC hearing as these items relate to these criteria. A supermajority vote of the Board is
necessary for approval. (STW)
RECOMMENDA nON:
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the request for PUDA-
2008-AR-13792 Naples Botanical Gardens PUD, subject to staff and the CCPC conditions of
approval.
PREPARED BY:
Melissa zone, Principal Planner
Department of Zoning & Land Development Review
PUDA-2008-AR-13792
April 30, 2009
Page 6 of 6
Item Number:
Item Summary:
Meeting Date:
Page lof2
Agenda Item No. 178
May 26, 2009
Page 7 of 159
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
178
This Item requires that all participants be sworn in and ex parte disclosure be provided by
Commission members. PUDA-2008-AR-13792 Naples Botanical Gardens, Inc. and the
Florida Gulf Coast University Foundation, Inc.. represented by R. Bruce Anderson, Esq. of
Roetzel and Andress; and Margaret Perry, AICP. of WilsonMiller, Inc.. are requesting a PUD
Amendment for the Naples Botanical Garden PUD (Ordinance 03-29). The approximately
171.2-acre subject property IS located in Section 23, Township 50 South, Range 25 East,
Collier County. Florida ICTS)
5/26/200990000 AM
Prepared By
Melissa Zone
Community Development &
Environmental Services
Principal Planner
Date
Zoning & Land Development Review
5/1/200910:15:25 AM
MPO Director
Date
Approved By
Nick Casalanguida
Transportation Services
Transportation Planning
5/1/20092:49 PM
Approved By
Ray Bellows
Community Development &
Environmental Services
Chief Planner
Date
Zoning & Land Development Review
5/4/2009 9:30 AM
Approved By
Steven Williams
P-.ttorneyls Office
Assistant County Attorney
Date
Attorney's Office
5/4/2009 ~ 2: 14 prJl
Approved By
Jeff Kiatzkow
County Attorney
County Attorney
County Attorney Office
Date
5/4/20093:34 PM
Approved By
Susan Istenes, AICP
Community Development &
Environmental Services
Zoning 8. Land Development Director
Date
Zoning & Land Development Review
5/512009 3:34 PM
Approved By
Judy Puig
Community Development &
Environmental Services
Operations Analyst
Date
Community Development &
Environmental Services Admin.
5!612009 9:42 AM
Approved B}'
Najeh Ahmad
Transportation Services
Director
Date
Transportation Engineering &
Construction Management
5/1212009 9:15 AM
Approved By
Joseph K. Schmitt
Community Development &
Date
Environmental Services Admfnstiator
file://r'\ApenrlJ'\Test\Fxnort\ 1 iO-M:wo/',?O?n %?O?OOq\ 17 %?OSr JMM A RY%?OAnFNOA \
'i/)O/)OOq
Community Development &
Environmental Services
Page 2 of2
Agenda Item r'.Jo. 178
May 26. 2009
Page 8 of 159
Community Development &
Environmental Services Admin.
5/12/200911:03 AM
Approved By
OMS Coordinator
County Manager's Office
OMS Coordinator
Date
Office of Management & Budget
5/12/20093:19 PM
Approved By
Mark Isackson
County Manager's Office
Budget Analyst
Date
Office of Management & Budget
5/14/2009 9:15 AM
Approved By
Leo E. Ochs. Jr.
Board of County
Commissioners
Deputy County Manager
Date
County Manager's Office
5/16/200911:35 AM
file://C':\ApencJn Te st\ FXllnrt\ 1 ~O-M;1V%)O/h OJ()/()!OOq\ 17 o/r,)OSI IMM A R V%)O A GFNnA \
,,/)O/)OOq
Agenda Item No. 178
May 26, 2009
Page 9 of 159
Transportation Commitment
1. "The developer, his successors, or assigns shall provide a fair share contribution
toward the capital cost of a traffic signal and turn lanes (or alternative intersection
roundabout design) at the intersection of Bayshore Drive and Thomasson Drive at such
time that the improvements are constructed. Payment shall be provided to the applicable
Public agency(ies) responsible for designing and constructing the improvements."
PUDA-2008-AR-13792
April 30, 2009
Attachment I
Agenda Item No. 178
AGENDA if;tIDVlZ~r2009
Page 10 of 159
.......
;;'~~:tA~:;~,
CQIl;ier County
l.;J,.<,..~c:,=-~:'7,"";r::''''''''''''\,:;,.;,;;'.l':""~:''~ '-'oI'l:":~. :":": ,.,:.; (". ':,::Cj::r..~:--.-~~:.'''t'''~:;,ii~:_:..:.r~2
STAFF REPORT
TO:
FROM:
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
DEPARTMENT OF ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
DIVISION
HEARING DATE:
APIUL 2, 2009
SUBJECT:
PUDA-2008-AR-I3792, NAPLES BOTANICAL GARDENS PLANNED
UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD)
PROPERTY O\\'NERS/AGENTS:
Owners:
Naples Botanical Gardens, Inc.
4820 Bayshore Drive, Suite D
Naples, FL 34] 12
Florida Gulf Coast University, Inc.
I 050 I FOCU Boulevard, South
FOl't f"fyers, FL 33965
Agents:
Margaret Perry, .AJCP
Wilson f\.1illcr, Inc
3200 Bailey Lane, Suite 200
Naples, FL 34105
R. Bruce Anderson, Esquire
RoetzeI & Andress, LPA
850 Park Shore Drive
Naples, FL 34103
REQUESTED ACTION:
To have the Collier COllnty Planning Commission (Cepe) consider an llPplication for an
amendmcnt to Ordinance Number 03-29, The Naples Botanical Garden Planned Unit
Development (PUD). Thc proposed amendment is to revise Section 4.14, Design Guidelines;
Section 6.2, Development Parameters; SecLiul1 6.4, Permitted Uses and Structures, to alia\-\'
interim or tcmporary structures; Section 6.5 Development Standards, so the interim or
temporary structures have a greater setback distance than the principal structures; Section 7.2,
Transportation Commitments, of the PUD Document: and add Section 7.6 to provide Deviations
-r.."'"'".."".... 11......... T n~~'~ l'\.........01n~...........,..H...+- r'l,-.--1....., (1 -'~0,
J1UlU l1JL L,LlllU L..II..:.-\'l..;..J\.JIJI1H..lll \...,Ul...l\"; l.LLJ"--).
March 20. 2009
Agenda Item No. 17B
May 26, 2009
Page 11 of 159
GEOGRAPHIC LOCA TTON:
The 171.2:1: acre subject property is located at 4820 Bayshore Drive at the southwest comer of
the intersection of Bayshore Drive and Thomasson Drive, in Section 23, Township 50 South,
Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida (see location map on the following page).
PURPOSEIDESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
The petitioner is requesting to amend five (5) sections of the Naples Botanical Gardens PUD
and to add a section for deviations from the LDC. The amendment to Section 4.14, Design
Guidelines, provides an altemative compliance process for architectural and design standards as
outlined in Section 5.05.08 of the LDC, except for the proposed interim or temporary stmctures
and maintenance stmctures, which will not require architectural and design standard review. To
compensate for not following the architectural requirement, the interim or temporary structures
\vill have a greater setback Ih)]n the right-of-'way (ROW) than the principal structures set fmth
in Section 6.5.B of the PUD document.
The amendment to Section 6.2, Development Parameters, will require the proposed interim or
temporary stmctures to be approved through the site development plan process to cnsme the
developer will comply with the Collier County Building Code and Americans with Disabilities
Act (ADA) regulations. The amendment to Section 6.4, Permitted Uses and Structures, is to
allow interim or temporary structures and to set time limits on the structures for an initial period
of three (3) years. If needed, the applicant can requests for an extension of the interim or
temporary structures beyond the tlu"ee (3) years administratively utilizing the insubstantial
change to the approved SOP. Certificates of occupancy for a permanent structure will not be
issued until the interim or temporary structure housing a particular use is removed from the site.
The amendment to Section 6.5, Development Standards, is to guarantee the interim or
temporary structures will have a greater setback distance than the principal structures. As \veIl,
the developer is requcsting revisions to Section 7.2, TranspOltation Commitments, of the PUD
Document, \vhich are explained in detail under the Transportation Review provided on page
four (4) of this report. In addition to the amendmcnts Hsted above, the developer requests to add
Section 7.6, which will permit Deviations from Section's 5.03.02, and Section 5.05.08 of the
LDC, which are explained in dctail under the Zoning Review deviations on page six (6) of this
report.
SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING:
North: Thomasson Drive, Single-Family and Multi-Family homes, and undeveloped property;
zoned Residential Multi-Family (RMF-6), and Commercial Intermediate (C-3), and
the Bayshore Mixcd Usc Overlay District.
East: Bayshore Drive, Single-Family homes, and commercial property; zoned Residential
Multi-Family (RMF-6), Village Residential (VR), Residential Single-Family (RSF-3),
and Heavy Commercial (C-5), Conm1ercial Intermediate (C-3), Commercial
Convenience (C-2) , and the Bayshore Mixed Use Overlay District.
March 20, 2009
2
CDCJ>CJ>
"- enD
~o".-
. N "-
o _0
Zr.DN
,...N-.;-
c:>-
mcoW
:::: 2: :Jl
co co
u a..
c:
(!)
OJ
<l:
>
r; D
, t
~ ~
r--
~I~
gi~
"
t;: ~
., I
c.
Cl
[)~
l!
i~
L
g ~
~ ~
I
:;1
~ r t,
J1n5 D.L LO~ I
-
-..
--r-f--
~ I
~ ~ I
/~}_I
r ~J
~I ,,,,,.du.H:.-l1
.~~ i ~.;';;I.I...,,,>. ""J- . . J ;;;J s\,-~ V ~
: "",,~!I~~/ ~ ~n ~B~g ,~ ~a /. i_ J
~~ ~ II,g~ t. ~ h?i=:,~~~;;Y ~
" . " I "o-r ,," /' ' "
~~.~ "1 r r- """ -I e' z/ D!
!ijl, ~ ~I ~ ~~ l~-- ~ ~ - -- ~ -1---- ~ \
~:~ ~ _ .__ ~ ~ J,,_ ~ .~/ i? 0 ~ -
~;<i l.~ ~ ~ " /;' 3~ N c"lS ../. ' /::/ "- 0
~~,~n~ "\--111' ~5 -;J~- ':~>'//r"; -' ~
~;;-.~: _~ '-'l... Ill] -~ _ r" \ -..;'/;; ~ ~ ~
lV',. L "I '" .0' ~..),1J1 __ I' \ " <
_ --"'!.I!.d '>'", f~~ I I - 'I ~~ I ~ ~
\, ~fi' 5=~ .: "-oTiP JJ -'---.- yb I ~
~I 1;/- ;-;.~ <;'-'
't{~ ~>- ~ ~...}:J l::~ ~ I i
6~ 1~ . M / f'-c.> '
t ! '! ! r; i't~l ~.".~.:': I!~ t ~ -.J Jl \
, . I\{ ~ ::l ~~ ~ :]
~y;- ~~. J ,,- Ir=::j~~'~ ..iS1t.;;j'W~'!' '-, c-' Y\ '\rf'
["jJb:Lie::J: It'1J''r'''' ~,. ,,~-.'r4-- ,~'7-'}'i" -<:"~
,,_., '"'''1\-' _ ~+_, ,-"{J ~ r ,~ 1\' ,- -~~~' '-...A'fpr~
_--==-------==,J I'ln,~ ~~~ ._~'~ ,;';~-'b,~hrj-::.r \C. j~h "~" /
~ ~ 'II \\:::j[~j C::JZ:~ -.\ "j \ \ I ~, ~"-<--.:J~JJ~~~f--.'~
I[ >- ~ H.J~ _" . _ " ' ~__. _~')l. 7, fC~
!:: ur V I , '? /' (.1' ::--
CJ ~ J - (.r' I r-/"'0 -_/;:), -- -~-
t._~./~~~ - --- '___~I =-'C:L~.::=r...s' c-'-/
_ ,,,,-,
~
.,<.'11CO
l_\1.'
Of
"
u.
"
'"
'"
U.
01
'"
0...
<(
~
<.9
z
z
o
N
NI
~l
0:
<:(
,
co
o
o
N
,
<:(
o
::>
(L
~~I
~i
t-i
~I
I
0...
<(
2
~I
"'--
o
I-
<(
o
()
.::JI
I
/\genda Item f\Jo. 178
May 26, 2009
Page 13 of 159
South: Single-Family homes, and Conservation property; zoned Residential Single-Family
(RSF-3), and Residential Multi-Family (RMF-6), and the Bayshore Mixed Use
Overlay District.
West: Hamilton Avenue, Single-Family and Multi-Family homes, Golf Course and
Conservation prope11y; zoned Windstal' PUD, Southpointe Yacht Club PUD, Sabal
Bay MPUD.
Aerial View
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY:
Future Land Use Element (FLUE): The subject property is located within the Urban
Designated Area (Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict and
Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Overlay), and is \""ithin the Coastal High I-Iazard
Area as identified on thc Future Land Use Map (FLUJ\.'f) of the Oro'wth I'vfanagement Plan
(GMP). This district is intended to accommodate a variety of residential and non-residential
uses including parks, open space, recreational uses and community facilities.
'~!itI1in tile Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict, and in order to facilitate hurricane evacuation
and to protect the adjacent environmentally sensitive Conservation designated area,
March 20,2009
3
J\genda Item No. 178
May 26, 2009
F'age14of159
residential development is permitted at a maximum density of four (4) units per acre, except
as allo\ved by eeltain FLUE Policies and in the Bayshore Triangle Redevelopment Overlay.
However, properties in the Naples Botanical Garden PUD are limited to non-residential uses,
except for caretaker, dormitory, and other housing related to the Botanical Garden or other
institutional and/or recreational open space uses.
The Naples Botanical Garden PUD is approved for recreational and open space uses, and
accessory conuncrcial llses, \','hich are consistent \vith those allowed in the Urban Coastal
Fringe. Based upon the above analysis, Comprehensive Planning staff finds the proposed
PUD amendment consistent with tlle FT lYE
Transportation Element: TranspOltation Planning staff have reviev.,red the petition and has
determined that the proposed amendments do not present an additional impact on the
adjacent roadv,'ay nenvork. As such, the roadway net\vork has sut1icient capacity to
acconunodate this project within the live (5) year planning period, and staff rcconunends that
this project be found consistent with Policies 5.1 and 5.2 of the Transportation Element of the
GMP.
ANAL YSIS:
Staff has completed a comprehensi ve evaluation of this land use petition and the criteria upon
which a recommendation must be based, specifically noted in Land Development Code
(LDC) Subsections 10.02.13.13.5, Planning Commission Recommendation, and 10.03.05.1,
Planning Commission Hearing and Report to the Board (~r County Commissioners, which
establish factual bases to support a recommendation. The CCPC usc:s these same criteria as
the basis for their recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners (BCC), \vho in
turn use the criteria to support their action on the rezoning request. These evaluations are
c0111p!eted as palt of this stafl:'report.
Environmental RCl'iell': Environmental Services staff have revie\\'ed this application and
have found that the amendment did not affect the previously approved preserve locations of
the PUD. For that reason, the PUD remains compliant with the Conservation and Coastal
Management Element (CCJ\1E), GMP and LDC.
Transportation Review: Transportation Planning staff have reviewed the application for
Naples Botanical Gardens PUD rclated to roadway impacts and found that no additional
traffic impacts arc presented hy the proposed amendments to the PUO commitments.
Furthermore, Transportation Planning staff have revie\ved the petition and the proposed
TranspOltation Commitments in Section 7.2 of the PUD document. The proposed changes
to the PUD commitments have been revicwed for consistency with conceptual intersection
improvements that have been evaluated by the Bayshol"e Community Redevelopment
Agency (CRA) "Bayshore Gateway Triangle Study" (Attachment A). This study
recommends a roundabout design at the intersection of Bayshore Drive and Thomasson
Drive with an altcmative of installation of signalization within the limits of the existing
conditions. Statl has agreed that the turn lane requirements stated in the Naples Botanical
March 20, 2009
4
Agenda Item No. 17B
May 26. 2009
Page 15 of 159
Garden's PUD are not cUlTently required and would constitute greater than the Naples
Botanical Garden's proportionate share to\",ards intersection improvements. Therefore,
Transportation staff has no objection to the amendment of these requirements, to be
replaced with a new requirement to provide propOltionate share of the future improvements
that are to be eonstructed under the authority of the Bayshore CRA when the improvements
are constructed.
TranspOltation Planning staff is also reconU11ending approval of the sidewalk provisions set
forth in Section 7.2 of the PUD documcnt. These provisions will provide a sidewalk along
the length of the Naples Botanical Gardens propelty on Thomasson Drive and along
Bayshore Drive from Thomasson Drive to the out parcel located on the west side of
Bayshore Drive. The developer shall provide a payment in lieu for the un-built 2,280 linear
feet of sidewalks along Hamilton A venue, and for the un-built 845 linear feet of sidewalk
along the west side of Bayshore Drive fro111 the out parcel opposite Republic Drive to the
preserve area. This payment in lieu will be used for sidewalk improvements along
Bayshore Drive as part of the Bayshore Drive South improvement project.
Ulilitv Review: According to the Section 7.3 of the approved PUD document, water
distribution facilities to serve the project are to be designed, constructed, conveycd, owncd
and maintained in accordance with the requirements ofthe City of Naples. Sewage collection
facilities shall be designed, constructed and maintained in accordance with Collier County
Ordinance No. 2004-31, as amended.
ZO/1hUj Review: As previously stated, the proposed uses are consistent with those allowed in
the Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict set forth in the GMP. To achieve compatibility with
adjacent uses, the site has been designed to minimize its impact on the sun'ounding
residential neighborhood by providing a masonry wall or prefabricated concrete wal1 for the
out parcel located east and \:vest of Bayshore Drive, and along the oul parcel located on
Thomasson Drive. Furthermore, the subject site will follow the Landscape requirements of
Subsection 4.06.02.CA of the LDC for buffering from the residential and conunercial land
uses. Additionally, the PUD provides for 56:1: acres of preserve area, which will provide
added buffering to the surrounding land uses along the western, southern and eastern portion
of Naples Botanical Gardens.
The PUD \vould provide appropriate setbacks f(Jr the interim or temporary structures from
the abutting ROWs. To ensure compatibility with the residential and commercial uses that
sUlTound it, the interim or temporary structure will be required to be set back a minimum of
300 feet from the propel1y boundary along Bayshore Drive, 500 feet from Hamilton Avenue
and the southcm property boundary, and 150 feet from Thomasson Drive. The maintenance
structures along Bayshore Drive Vi/ill not be required to meet Section 5.05.08 of the LDC.
The distance from the maintenance building to the closest residential property line is 350
feet, and there is a six-foot (6') high wall and landscape buffer at the Naples Botanical
Gardens propeliy line, both of which serve to mitigate the impacts of the visibility of the
structure.
March ]0, ]()09
5
Agenda Item No. 178
May 26, 2009
Page 16 of 159
Staff acknowledges and supports the requested amendment for the maintenance structures
not meeting the architectural requirements of the LDC, but that request was not discussed at
the Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM). Staff has requested the applicant to provide
foundation plantings around the interim or temporary structures as well as the maintenance
structures to mitigate the appearance of the structures for not adhering to the Architectural
and Site Design Standards of the LDC, which have bcen incOJ1JOrated into the PUD
ordinance.
With the remaining development standards contained in the approved PUD, and the
sti11ulation for apIJToval recon1Jnended by staff, t11c project \vould renlain cornpatible v~ith the
residential and commercial land uses \vhich have coexisted since 2003.
Deviations: Section 7.6 of the proposed PUD amendment exhibit, the petitioners seeks approval
of three (3) deviations from the LDC, and has provided justification to SUppOlt these deviations.
Staff has analyzed these requests and offers the following analyses and recommendations:
Deviation 1 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.03.02.A.l.a.i, Fences and Walls
Requirements; Chain link and wood fences are prohibited forward of the primary
facade and must be a minimum of 100 feet from a public right-of-way. The
deviation will allow a chain link fence to be permitted and set back at a minimum of
ten (10) feet from a public right-of-way, except when located adjacent to a preserve
\vhere the setback shall be a minimum of five (5) feet. Also, a chain link fence may
be pennitted at the preserve boundary on the southem Naples Botanical Gardens
property line.
Pl'Opo.<;al The applicants are of the opinion that since there is an existing recorded
conservation easements within tcn (10) fcct of the property line on Thomasson Drive
and Hamilton Avenue, a minimum setback of five (5) feet is needed to allow the
fence to be mcandered to avoid as much existing vegetation as possible and al1m\'
the fenee to blend more seamlessly \:vith the sUlTounding preserve vcgetation. if
needed the developer would like the option to construct a fence along the southern
boundary at the property line.
Staff's Determination: Sinee the site has an existing recorded conservation
easements within ten (10) feet of the properLy line 011 Thomasson Drive and
Hamilton Avenue, staff has recommended the alternative noted above so as not to
disturb the existing vegetation. All fences and walls shull be maintained in a manner
that \villnot detract from the neighborhood or COnUl1Ulllty. To achieve the intent of
the fences and \valls requirement staff is requesting the chain link fence be the color
of black (0 mitigate the impact of the height and look of a chain link fence closer to
the ROW. Also, statT is requesting the applicant to limit tIle chain link fence to
Thomasson Drive, Hamilton A venue, and the preserve area of Bayshore Drive. It
should be noted that tbe applicant bas already installed an aluminum picket fence
aiong Buyshore Drive adjacent to the Naples Botanical Gardens.
March 20, 2009
6
Agenda Item No. 178
May 26, 2009
Page 17 of 159
Deviation 2 seeks relief from Section 5.03.02.A.1.a.ii. ea), Fences forward of the
primary facade, excluding chain link. and v'lood are permitted under the following
conditions: (a) Fences must not exceed four feet in height. The deviation will
allow a chain link fence to be permitted at a height of five (5) feet.
Proposal: A four-foot (4') high fence will not provide adequate security for this
facility. The Naples Botanical Garden functions as an outdoor museum and as
such requires that admissions be controlled and the facilities secured when the
Garden is not open. The applicant proposes to install a five-foot (5') high, chain
!ink fence along its perimeter in order to adequately secure the facility. The
additional height will assist in providing better security for this facility and
adjoining residential property.
Stqif's Determination: \Vhen this deviation was presented during the NIM, the
neighbors agreed that tlus is a reasonable alternative. Staff has reconm1ended
approval because of the unique security issues associated with an outdoor
museum. The additional foot will not obstruct views nor will it detract from the
neighborhood or community.
Deviation 3 seeks relief fro111 LDC Section 5.05.08, Architectural and Site Design
Standards; The pUll)ose of these standards is to supplement existing development
criteria in order to complement, enhance and enrich the urban fabric of Collier
County with an abundant variety of architecture. The deviation \vill allow
maintenance, intcrim or temporary structures to be exempt from the required
architectural and design standard revie\"l.
Proposal: Due to the nature of the use and/or duration of the use it is not
appropriate to require maintenance, interim or temporary structures be reviewed
for architectural standards. Pcnnanent structures are still required to comply \vith
the Purpose and Intent Section 5.05.08, Architectural and Site Design Standards,
of the LDC.
Staff's Determination: The proposed deviation would fulfill the LDC requirement
relative to the Florida Building Code and ADA compliance, while at the same
time comply \"lith the site development plan process. Furthermore, these structures
wiiI be setback farther from the ROW than the principal structures, and for those
reasons staff supports this deviation. To achieve the intent of the Architectural
and Site Design Standards, the applicant intends to comply with Section 4.06.05,
Foundation Plantings of the LDC.
Compliance with Sub-section 10. 02. 13.B.5. of" the IDC: Plamling COmnllSSlOn
recommendation. The platU1ing commission shall make written findings as required in
section 10.02.08 of the LOC, and shall reconU11end to the Board of County Commissioners
(BCC) either approval of the POD rezoning as proposed; approval with conditions or
modifications; or delual. In support of its recommendation, the planning commission shall
March 20, lUUY
7
I\genda Itern No. 17B
May 26, 2009
Page 18 of 159
make findings as to the pun master plan's compliance with the folIoV\:ing criteria 111
addition to the findings in section 10.02.08.
a, The suitability of the al,ea for the f1'pe and pattern of dcyelopment proposed in
relation to physical characteristics of thc land, surrounding areas, traffic and
access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities.
The proposed amendment \vill not adversely impact the approved mitigation
measures that are contained in the Naples Botanical Gardens PUD Ordinance, and
will assure compliance with all the Level of Service (LOS) as recommend by the
GMP. The subject petition has been reviewed by the appropriate staffs that are
responsible 1'01' oversight of the LOS spelled out in the GMP.
Additionally, a Transportation Impact Statement (TIS) was not required as part of the
PUD amendment application. A TIS Waiver for the PUD Amendment \\'as granted at
the Pre-Application Conference on July 24, 2008. The applicant was not asked to
resubmit the previously submitted SDP TIS for October 2007. The only update that
was required for this petition was a supplemental narrative supplied on July 2008 for
the FGCU-Botanical Garden pnrcel SDP.
b. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposl'd
agreements, contmct, or other instruments, or for amendments in those
proposed, particularly ~lS they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be
made for thc continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities
that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Findings and
recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the
county attorney.
Documents submitted with the application provide evidence of unified control.
c. Conformity of the proposed PlJD ,,.'ith the goals, objectives, policies and thc
Fnture Land Use Elcmcnt of the growth management plan.
On page three (3) of this staff rep011, the Comprehensive Planning Department
provided a detailed analysis of I1mv this project meets the goals, objectives,
policies and FLUE of the GMP.
d. The internal and cxtl~mal compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may
include l'estdctions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and
buffering and screening requil'ements.
The Naples Botanical Gardens PUD has been designed to optimize internal and
external land use because of the development standards, landscape, buffering
requirements contained in the PUD Ordinance. Furthermore, the PUD's approved
land uses are consistent with the land uses permitted in Section 2.03.07.1, of the
LDC, Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Overlay.
e. The adequacy of usabie open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve
the deveiopmcnt.
March 10,2009
8
Agenda Item No. 178
May 26, 2009
Page 19 of 159
The amount of usable open space for the Naples Botanical Garden PUD is 66.8:!:
acres. This project exceeds the minimum requirement of the LDC.
f. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy
of available improvements and facilities, both public and private.
Development has already commenced, and has been through concurrency
requirements which were triggered during the site development process,
Additionally, any future development will have to adhere to the transportation
commitments contained in the pun Ordinance as well as be in compliance with
all other applicable conCUlTency management regulations when the developmcnt
approvals are sought.
g. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate
expansion.
Comparative to this petition and the development of the subject site is timely
because Supp0l1ing infrastructure such as capacity of roads, wastewater, and
utilities which are currently available. When the developer comes in to expand the
project, it will be reviewed again for SUPP011ing infrastructure, and must be in
compliance with all LOS to accommodate the expansion.
h. Conformity with pun regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such
regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such
modifications are justified as meeting public pm'poses to a degree at least
equivalent to literal application of such regulations.
The development standards and deviations proposed are similar to the design
standards for the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Overlay Bayshore
Mixed-Use District (BMUD) Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict development
standards set f01th in Section 4.02.16, of the LDC.
Conmliance with Sub-seclion 10.03.05.1 of the LDC: Nature of requirements of plmming
commission report. When pe11aining to the rezoning of land, the report and
recommendations of the planning commission to the Board of County Conunissioners
required in 10,02.12 D. shall show that the plmming conunission has studied and
considered the proposed change in relation to the following, when applicable:
1. '''hether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, and
policies and future land use map and the clemcnts of tbc growth management
plan.
The Comprehensive Planning Department has provided a detailed analysis on
page three (3) of this report, on how this petition is consistent with all applicable
elements of the GMP. The prope11y is located within the Urban Designated Area
(Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict and
Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Overlay), and is within thc Coastal
High Hazard Area, as identified on the Future Land Use Map (FLUM). This
March 20. 2009
9
,L\.genda Item No. 178
May 26, 2009
Page 20 of 159
district is intended to accomnlOdate a variety of land uses including recreational
uses, and community facilities.
2. The existing land use pattern.
The subject 171.2:f: acres site is approved for recreational and open space land
uses with commercial accessory land use. The Naples Botanical Gardens provide
an education center, exhibition gallery, nursery and maintenance structures. The
existing land to the north is Single-Family and Multi-Family homcs and
undeveloped property. The existing land to the cast is Single-Family homes and
Deli's grocery store. The existing land to the south is Singie-Fmnily homes and
conservation/preserve land. The existing land to the west is Single-Family and
Multi-Family homes, conservation/preserve land and a golf course. The
Bayshore/Gatev,,ray Triangle Redevelopment Overlay permits commercial,
residential, recreational and open space development.
3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby
districts.
The approved Naples Botanical Gardens PUD (Ordinance No. 03-29) v,,ras
deemed to be of sufficient size (171.2::l: acres) and did not result in an isolated
district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. fUi1hennore, the amendment
request does not change the projects consistency V'lith the FLUE.
4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing
conditions on the property proposed for change.
The Naples Botanical Gardens PUD boundaries have not changed since June 24,
2003 when the original approval of the subject PUD was decmcd to bc logically
drawn when the Ordinance No. 03-29 was approved.
5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed
amendment necessary.
The applicant is seeking to modify the PUD to alter that provision that require the
applicant to pay proportionate share for any future improvements when deemed
necessary by the Count}'. The applicant feels the turn-lane commitments in the
CUITent IJUD allo\^/s the C~ounty the right to conle back to the Na})les Botanical
Gardens at any time in the future to ask for intersection improvements when the
County deems it necessary. This would require the applicant to pay for
improvements that may be triggered by another development.
Furthermore, the applicant is modifying the Naples Botanical Garden PUD
language to reflect partial payment-in-lieu for the perimeter sidewalks. The
payment-in-lieu will be earmarked for improvements to the Bayshore Drive South
improvement project.
Additionally, because u[ 1he etHiCal ccullomy, the Naplcs Botanical Gardens are
unable to procurc funding to complete the construction of the principal structures.
March 20. 2009
10
Agenda Item No. 178
May 26, 2009
Page 21 of 159
For that reason, the applicant is requesting to include interim or temporary
structures as a permitted use until the applicant is able to construct the pelmanent
structures, at whieh time, the interim or temporary structure will be removed prior
to the issuance of the certificate of occupancy.
6. Whether the pr'oposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the
neighborhood.
The proposed amcndmcnt should not adversely influence living conditions in the
neighborhood because the setbacks for the interim or temporary structures are
greater than the principal and accessory structures. Also, the current development
standards and landscape buffering requirements contained the PUD are designed
to ensure the least amount of adverse impact on the adjacent developments.
7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic
congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with sOl'munding land
uses, because of peak yolnmes or projected types of \'ehicular traffic, including
activity during construction phases of the development, or other'wise affect
public safef)'.
The Naples Botanical Gardens PUD is planned to incorporate natural systems for
water management purposes in accordance with their natural functions and
capabilities as required by the Drainage Sub-Element of the Public Facilities
Element of the GMP. In addition, all final development orders for this project are
subject to the Concurrency Management System of the Adequate Public Facilities
Ordinance.
8. Whether the pmposed change will create a drainage problem.
Section 7.4 of the PUD document requires the developer to adhere to all County
Ordinances related to paving, grading, site drainage and utility plans. The
developer is also required to provide a copy of the South Florida Water
Management District (SFWMD) permits prior to any construction drawing
approvals.
9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and ail' to adjacent
arcas.
The clevelopment standards for Naples Botanical Gardens PUD are not being
amended other than to allow maintenance, interim or temporary structures, which
have a greater set-back from the ROW than the principal and accessory structures.
The pemlitted maximum height is three (3) habitable stories; ho\vever, the
Tropical Rainforest Conservatory \vas approved to be eighty-five (85) feet to the
eave and one-hundred twenty feet (120) to the peak. Accessory structures are
permitted at a maximum height of twenty-five (25) feet. It should also be noted
that the subject site is located near preserve tracts of the Sabal Bay PUD to the
south and west.
March 20, 2009
11
Agenda Item No. 178
rv1ay 26, 2009
Page 22 of 159
10. \Vhether the proposed change will adversely affect property values in the
adjacent area.
The Naples Botanical Gardens PUD was approved June 24, 2003 and was found
during the original approval that the rezone should not adversely affect property
values. However, this is a subjective determination based upon anticipated results
\vllich may be internal or external to the subject property. Since property
valuation is affected by several factors including zoning, zoning by itself may 01'
may not affect the values of the adjacent area.
11. \Vhethcr the proposed change will he a deterrent to the improvement or
development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations.
The current landscape and buffer requirements in conjunction with the preserve
area and setbacks, and the proposed development standards combined with the
site development p13n approval process, providcs assunmce the previously
approved PUD will not result in a detenence to the adjacent properties.
12. 'Whether' the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an
individual owner as contrasted with the public ,,'eIfare.
On June 24, 2003 tbe Board of County Commissioners (BCC) approved the
Naples Botanical Gardens PUD (Ordinance No. 03-29), at that time, the BCe
determined that this PliD will not constitute a special privilege. On page three (3)
of this report, the PUD amendment request did not alter the land use and \-\'as
found consistent with the FLUE.
13. \"hether there are suhstantial reasons why the PI'opcl.ty cannot be used in
accordance with existing zoning.
The property is being used in accordance \vith the existing zoning which is Naples
Botanical Gardens PUD.
14. '''hcther the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the ncighborhood
or the county.
Naples Botanical Gardens PUD \'\'as designed to meet the intent of the
13ayshore/Gate\vay Triangle Redevelopment Overlay District. The PUD is
pedestrian-oriented, with a mix of land uses including gift shop, offices and civic
amenities that complement each other. Additionally, the proposed interim or
temporary structures will be set-back from the ROW at a greater distance than the
principal structures and will not be out of scale \vith the existing neighborhood.
15. '''hethel' it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county fOl' the
proposed use in districts already permitting such use.
This crikrion Joes not apply since the Naples Botanical Gardens PUD has existed
since June 24, 2003 (Ordinance No. 03-29).
March 20, 2009
12
.Agenda Item No. 178
May 26, 2009
Page 23 of 159
16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration
which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of
potential uscs under the proposed zoning classification.
The extent of the site alteration will be required to go through extensive
evaluation by federal, state, and local development regulations during any site
development plan approval process.
17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and
sen'iees consistent with the levels of sen,ice adopted in the Collier County
gro'wth management plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier
County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance [Code ch. 106, art. II], as
amended.
The project will have to meet all applicable criteria describe in the PUD
Ordinance, as well as all thc regulations set forth in the LDC and the Adequate
Public Facilities Ordinance.
18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County
Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health,
safety, and welfare.
This will be dctermined by the BCC during the advertised public hearing.
ENVIRONMENT AL ADVISORY COUNCIL (EAC):
Since the subject site has already been developed, the applicants were not required to
submit an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for this petition. As a result, they \:\,'ere
not required to have a hearing before the EAC.
NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM):
The meeting was duly noticed by the applicant and held on January 6, 2009 at 5:30 p.m. at the
Naples Botanical Gardens, Twenty (20) people from the public attended, as well as the
applicant's team (Margaret Perry, Jared Bro\vn and Jeff Pen-y of Wilson Miller, Inc., and Brian
Holley, Executive Director of the Botanical Gardens) and county staff. Margaret Perry
presented an overview of the requested PUD amendments and deviations their client is seeking.
There was no opposition from those in attendance on the requested amendments or deviations;
however below are suggestions and comments:
1. One resident suggested adding more stops for the Collier County Area Transit (CAT)
public transportation service along Bayshore Drive in Ihl1lt of the Naples Botanical Gardens
to help those who want to visit the facility, and to lead to less traffic in the area.
2. Most in attendance seemed very pleased with the installation of sidewnlks on Thomasson
Drive and Bayshore Drive.
3. The residents did not have concerns with the revised turn lane requirements added to the
PUD.
llIarch 20. 2009
13
i'\genda Item No. 178
f\1ay 26, 2009
Page 24 of 159
4. The neighbors were supp0l1ive of the deviations from the LDC requirement for fences and
walls by allowing a fence height of five (5') feet, instead of the required four-foot (4')
requirement.
5. The neighbors also supported the interim or temporary facilities until the permanent
structures are built.
COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW:
The County l\ttorney Office bas rcvic\vcd the staff report for PlJDJ^~~2008-i^l.R-13792 revised
on March 20, 2009.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the CCPC forward Petition PUDA-2008-AR-13792 to the Board of
County Commissioners (BCC) with a recommendation of approval subject to the deviations
requested by the applicant contained in Section 7.6 of the PUD amendment and the following
recommendation:
1. Fences and Walls are su)Jject to all LDC requirements except the applicant has the
option to use a black chain link fence not to exceed five feet (5') in height. If the
applicant opts to use chain link, it shall be black and only be used along Thomasson
Drive and Hamilton j\ vcnue and the pOliion of Bayshore Drive where the preserves
are located.
A TT ACHMENT:
A. Bayshore Gateway Triangle Study
March 20, 2009
]4
Agenda Item No. 178
May 26, 2009
Page 25 of 159
PREPARED BY:
/)"y! j// ~ I
I / (fic~l>& r'~~ _ B / / dJ) t1CE:5'9
MELISSA ZONE, PRlBCTP AL PLANNER / / DATE '
DEPARTMENT OF ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
REVIEWED BY:
d
/ \ ~j/
// :~',I I \) //-~,~, /~.__/"
RA YMOND V~ BELLOWS,20NING MANAGER
DEPARTMENT OF ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REVlEW
~~ "
,,/
n t(
) i
DATE
~JJ.u:.-,) C;t--:~J. / -5t~/f'1~e ,t-'l :~ /'7 {- /e '7
"SUSAN M. ISTENES, Alep, DIRECTOR ;' /bATE
DEPARTMENT OF ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
APPROVED BY:
11 .#'
~ ./"/ . /
,/f~ * :1 ~4..../~
JD$PH K. SCHMITT ADMINISTRATOR
C9MMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL
SERVICES DIVISION
I /
-1/..2,,10 <1
I / '
DATE
Tentatively scheduled for the May 26, 2009 Board of County Commissioners Meeting
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION:
'i r '2 --0 ~
MARK P. STRAIN, CHAIRMAN
DATE
March 20, 200U9
15
Agenda Item No. 17B
May 26, 2009
Page 26 of 159
7.0 RECOMMENDED TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS
The transportation improvements recommended for the PIA included but not limited too, mobility improvements
and traffic calming measures These impmvement measures are discussed in this section.
7.1 Mobility Improvement Measures
in addition to the intersection improvements discussed In Section 6.5. Improvements recommended to improve
overall traffi.c mobility include the instaliation of a new roundabout Implementation of access management policy
recommendations, and modifications to access at Shadowlawn Elementary School. These improvements, and
their potential benefits and impacts, are discussed in detail below
7.1.1
Roundabout
Installation of a roundabout at the Bayshore DnvelThomasson Dnve intersection is recommended to enhance
mobility and provide traffic calming. The roundabout would have two circulatory lanes and would serve all traffic
movements. Based on the gUidelines presented in the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) publication
"Roundabouts: An Informational Guide". the minimum inscribed circle diameter for a roundabout should be 150
feet (Figure 7-1). Currently, neither Collier County nor the City of Naples requires specific design guidelines for
the construction of a roundabout Preliminary analysis Ind icates that such a roundabout would require right-of-
vvay acquisition in one or more quadrants of this intersection
Instaiiation of a roundabout is not expecred to deteriorate the traffic operations at this intersection and Table
7-1 shovvs the results of the LOS analj'sis
Table 7-1
Roundabout Level of Service Analvsis
, I
MaXlnlUrr
Vie Lovl/
I, ',.
InMscctmn r,ne ,:,,,'~~T~~~:;:~~:
h'shore Drive <> ihomassc.n Dnve
!~=IZ~1I1d 00 - ___oom n -- 0- -1----:-:-.:0 0 10 - c-:-~~, 0 I ',. CO I c T'<
t.stt'JUf1(J -p I rl~tl j! ~I~
)'l~!'rJlwcl ~ TLO i ": I r,' ~T"
)(Jlrlt ~1.jtld _~___ l__~~~~~J_~_~' ',:) _ __ L T~
nIP....""".~Ii"nl 1~\:1'"' I (.,-r' .h,~,r'n' I
I . - -" I A ,~ I " ~ r,' ,-. ~'" c.,",, I
tt rSBctlon Level of Servi::e .
)\cs = [;'.It 'urn T = 7"rO.I<.1I:. R = F':ol'j Tin [;dL = [iel:i.~I(\ I (:flli1,r) L';~; = ie..,.,' of ~'er\'I(.t
en
[) i 7
GA2
0_51
c -,-:;
c Ci'
o 19
(j (1
C C7
r. '=I 1
U U I
,~
I~:e C:~l~,c:r & ::U:CWS::, :nc
-. ."]
Agenda Item No. 178
May 26, 2009
Page 27 of 159
7.1.2 Access Management
Through the community involvement efforts. several specific locations were identified as present safety or
mobility Issues in regards to access. ThIs study recommends develDpment of guidelines for future developments
to prevent such issues in the future
Gulfgate Plaza, identified area of concern, at the southwest corner of the 8ayshore/US 41 intersection has
one access point onto US 41 and one access point onto Bayshore Drive. The Bayshore Drive access point
allows all movements in and out, while the US 41 access point does not allow left turns outbound. The left turn
movement at the Bayshore Drive access point causes traffic conflicts as vehicles often make the movement in
two steps, stopping in the med;an before proceeding into northbound traffic
The PIA recommends [making the necessary regulatory or process changes] to
· Encourage or allow the use of single points of access for multiple destinations. even if the properties are
not under the same ownership. and
· Encourage the use of side-street access points to minimize new access points on eXisting major facilities,
especially along Ba}'shore Drive.
~"...
-,I .....-
Agenda Item No. 176
May 26, 2009
Page 28 of 159
7.1.3 School Access at Shadowlawn Elementary
During school pick-up and drop-off times, vehicles currently park in undesignated areas in front of the school.
This creates turbulence in the traffic flow on Bayshore Drive and increases the potential for vehicle/pedestrian
conflicts. The PIA suggests moving the automobile drop-off/pick-up point to the northern side of the school
(current bus pick-up point) and switching the bus plck-up/drop-off location to the horseshoe driveway adjacent
to Shadowlawn Drive. While this measure was recommended by the PIA, additional coordination would be
required bet\^_'een the schoo! district and the County.
7.2 Traffic Calming Measures
PrevIously mentioned in Sections 1.0 through 3.0. there is a perception that of the roads wIthin study area are
being used by vehicles to bypass congestion on nearby arterials. This cut-through traffic can produce increased
pedestrian/vehicle conflicts for those living on local streets In 1995, the Collier County MPO developed the
Neighborhood Traffic Management Program (NTMP) and established the Traffic Calming Task Force to provide
the resources for local neighborhoods to combat cut-.through traffic issues. The program's intent is to make:
'.. . strategic changes to streets in order to reduce vellicle speeds and to (Jecrease the cars' dommance
in the neighborhood. Traffic calming devices. such as those included in this program, are designed and
located to keep througli traffic on major roads" - Collier County MPO I\JTrvlP (1995)
Following is a description of several recommended traffic calming techniques, the goals of each technique, and
the qualitative effect under the PiA Ea::h of the subsequent traffic calming techniques were developed through
the public outreach effort.
7.2.1
Gateway Treatments and Neck-downs
Gateway Treatments are street amenities that Include Signs. banners. landscaping or other structures that
communicate a sense of place or identify a nelqliborhood. r-Jeck-downs are the physical reduction of a roadway
iane widt!i through the Lise of curbing rr",duction or center median
Goal
The combination of a center median gateway treatment and lane narrowing tnr:::>ugh a neck-dovm is intended
to accomplish two goais: 1) to create a sense af place With slgnage and landscaping: 2) to siow speeds by
constraining roadway lane width. The piacement o{ elements at the entrance to streets, as highlighted In Table
5-1, is intended to Indicate to motons:s usrng local streets as a cut-though that they rIave entered a residential
neight;orhood Th:s change IS intended to reduce the number- of through vehicles The ph)tsical neck-down
in lane width is intended to slow vehi:::le speeds on local streets and to fUliher jeter through traffic. providing
incentive for these trips to stay on the major arter-ial
It should be noted that the ga:e\lvay ireatnlents recomm,:::ncied along Bavshore/Shadowlawn Dnves do not
inclUde median qateway lre2itrnents or reductiO!": in lane Width in these areas, the gatevva)' treatment :onslsts
of aesthetlc amenities located at the Side of tne roadway only
Theoretical Effect of Recommended Measure Under the PIA
Studies have shOVlin a reductIon in speeds (of up Ie 7 mpr:) correlatIng With a reduction In lane width Rc-adway
naiTOWing also often resuiis in high (8C/'(+) ieveis of pub:lc s3tlsfacllon wi:n trH:' traffiC calming technique, while
resu!ting in no change in thro~gh \/E:tj:Cl'2 vDlunl[.:;. .:::v1cC:ourt, .Sut'~:ey t.)f fJsjghtJorn\)od Traffic i\r1anagetnent
Pen'"orrnance and ,~e.su/t.s, '1 S197 )
Agenda Item No. 178
May 26, 2009
Page 29 of 159
It could be expected that the lane-width reduction due to the neckdown, combined with the visual gateway
treatment, would result in reduction in vehicle speeds in the vicinity of the treatments. In comparison to other
recommendations in PIA, this particular technique is likely to have the greatest impact of reducing cut-through
traffic within the study area.
Figures 7-2 and 7-3 graphically suggest the potential appearance of Linwood Avenue before and after the
construction of gateway treatments and neck-downs.
C/'> . ... .. . ;e~,
Gateway
Treatment
Source: Carter g. 8lHQ2S~, In::. [20(6)
'"7,
I\genda Item No. 178
May 26, 2009
Page 30 of 159
7.2.2 Speed Enforcement
An increase in speed enforcement activities was suggested by the public during the workshop. As a result, the
PLll, recommends increased speed enforcement activities in conjunction with other traffic calming measures in
order to achieve the greatest effectiveness Another recommendation with public support is the reduction of the
posted speed limit along Bayshore Drive from 35 miles per hour (mph) to 30 mph. However, during the December
2006 public meeting, participants indicated that there may not be general support for this measure.
Goal
The goal of speed enforcement efforts and postej speed I:mit changes would be to reduce through-vehicle
speeds and cut-through traffic volumes
Theoretical Effect of Recommended Measure under the PIA
Enforcement activities generally achieve some short-term reduction of vehicle speeds. The reduction in the
posted speed limit in coordination with speed enforcement \Nould also generally achieve a short-term reduction
of vehicle speeds. If combined with the installation of other permanent features, the effect could be Ionger-
term.
- :h-
A.genda Item No. 178
May 26, 2009
Page 31 of 159
8.0 RECOMMENDED AESTHETIC IMPROVEMENTS
A.esthetic amenities incorporate various elements along streets within the study area, pnmarily within the
neighborhood streetscape. Streetscaping lies in the public right-of-way between building facades and the roadway.
It includes the street. sidewalks, lighting, planting, furniture, public art, and other elements. As a result of the
public outreach effort several aesthetic amenities were identified as recommended improvements under the PIA
(described in detail below): all result in creating a sense of place and connectivity between the neighborhoods.
north and south of US 4-1.
8. 1 Landscaping and Sidewalk Furniture
Suggested landscaping improvement recommendations consist of plantings within the streetscape. The
maintenance of these improvements can be costly and therefore only native species are recommended under
the PIA. Sidewalk furniture includes benches. bike racks, trash cans, and other similar elements Below are
descriptions and recommended locations of the landscaping and sidewalk furniture elements included in the
PIA. Further study is recommended to design the appearance. structure, and placement of these landscaping
or sidewalk furniture amenities.
8.1.1 Purpose and Goal
The intention oftllis amenity can be defined as providing enhanced community character and a sense of place.
Through the use of consistent design elements. the 8ayshore/Shadowlawn corndor can be quickly identified
as one community by visitors and restdents alike. Street furniture elements invite and promote a lively street
where residents and visitors feel comfortable.
8.1.2 Shadowlawn Drive
Currently, Shadowlawn Drive does not have any landscaping improvements. The PIA recommends landscaping
amenities to promote pnde and a strong sense of place '..vhile providing a visual connection to the areas
along Bayshore Drive. Roadway medians are not recommended; however, landscaping is suggested along
Shadowlawn Drive to provide a buffer between Ule sidewalk and moving vehicles. These landscaping
improvements should not impede the line of sight for drivers Sidewalk furniture would be placed uniformly
along the corridor with particular attention to areas near Shadowlawn Elementary School.
Figures 8~1 and B-2 graphically depict the potential appea,ance af Shadowlawn Drive before and after the
construction of landscaping and sidewalk furniture treatments.
8.1.3 Bayshore Drive
Bayshore Drive south of US 41 has recently Implemented several landscaping elements and no further
Improvements are recommended. However, street furniture amenities are recommended, specifically at bus
stop locations where benches and bike racks wCiuld benefit patrons of the local if ansit system.
8.1.4 Linwood Avenue, Andrew Drive, and Other Local Streets
Based on community input. several local streets \I':ithin the study area were not recommended for additional
landscaping or street furniture Improvements
- ./ ,/-
Agenda Item tJo. 178
May 26, 2009
Page 32 of 159
..'.,. -.
c"'>Aesth'etlc
Amenities
Treatment
ScurC!~: Cart€t & B.urQe~~, '1'1C _ U006
-7~~.-
Agenda Item No. 178
May 26, 2009
Page 33 of 159
8.2 Themed Lighting
Themed lighting is the use of aesthetically pleasing lights which illuminate pedestrian sidewalks. These lights
generally range in height from 15 to 20 feet and aesthetically signify the corridor's sense of neighborhood or
community. They may include banners with the community's name that further enhance a sense of place for the
neighborhood. Additional study would be required to determine the appearance of the themed lighting scheme
and to coordinate it with other aesthetic amenities.
8.2.1 Purpose and Goal
The intention of implementing themed lighting amenities within the study area can be defined as providing
enhanced community character and a sense of place. Through the use of consistent lighting schemes and
neighborhood banners, residents and visitors would quickly identify the 8ayshore/Shadowlawn corridor as one
community.
8.2.2 Bayshore/Shadowlawn Corridor
Currently, there is themed lighting in place along Bayshore Drive south US 41. However, there are no themed
lighting elements along Shadowlawn Drive. It is recommended thata consistent lighting scheme be implemented
for both Bayshore Drive and Shadowlawn Drive. Consistency would enhance neighborhood connectivity and
distinguish the study area as a whole community. Themed lighting is recommended for Shadowlawn and
Bayshore Drives only, signifying the central corridor of the study area, whereas side-streets would not merit the
implementation of themed lighting.
Figures 8-1 and 8-2 graphically suggest the potential appearance of Shadowlawn Drive before and after the
construction of themed lighting treatments.
8.3 Visual Screening
During the May 2006 public outreach efforts an existing water tank located north of the Lois Avenue intersection
(along the western edge of Shadowlawn Drive) was identified as a neighborhood "eye-sore" or an aesthetically
unappealing structure.
8.3.1 Purpose and Goal
The PIA recommends a strategy for reducing the visual impact of the water tank structure by planting mature
trees or palms to bllffer the appearance of the water tank from Shadowlawn Drive. However. due to the height
of the structure, landscaping alone could not fully buffer the visual appearance of the water tank. It is also
recommended that the structure be painted to camouflage or subdue the visual appearance. A meta! link fence
used to secure the grounds around the water tank is also visible from Shadowlawn Drive and the construction
of an aesthetically pleasing fence would further reduce the visual impact of the water tank.
Figures 8-1 and 8-2 graphically suggest the potential appearance of Srladowiawn Drive before and after visuai
screening treatments.
-79-
Aaenda Item No. 178
~ May 26, 2009
Page 34 of 159
8.4 Landscaping Line of Sight Issues
During the public outreach process, several sections of the landscaped median along Bayshore Drive were
identified as an obstruction to motorists' line of sight The PIA recommends that the landscaping in question
be either trimmed or removed to reduce line of sight obstructions This recommendation does not include the
complete removal of landscaping within the center median.
~ ~-: n-
Agenda Item No. 178
May 26, 2009
Page 35 of 159
9.0 RECOMMENDED MODAL AMENITY IMPROVEMENTS
Modal amenities in the PIA are elements related to transit facilities, pedestrian facilities, and other multi-modal
types of infrastructure. These amenities focus on facilitating and promoting alternate modes of travel by providing
connectivity to transit while promoting a safe, pedestrian-friendly environment.
9.1 Extended Transit Service
As identified in Sections 1.0 and 2.0 the Collier Area Transit (CAT) bus service operates the Orange Route 2
northbound only along 8ayshore drive between Thomasson Drive and US 41.
The PIA recommends that CAT consider adding additional transit service southbound along the same portion
of Bayshore Drive. As new commercial and mixed-use development occurs along Bayshore, many study area
residents are likety to make short trips up and down the corridor. However, these distances may be too far to
walk, especially for individuals with mobility Impairments. Extension of transit service to include both directions
along Bayshore would provide transit options for these reSidents to circulate throughout the area without relying
on an automobile. Additional transit service would also provide area residents with greater connectivity to the
City of Naples and Collier County.
In the Collier MPO's LRTP, the 2006-2015 Transportation Development Plan Update (Section 8.1.1) recommends
expanding service hours and operations As future development intensifies in the study area, the PLA. also
recommends additional study to determine ifincreased frequency of bus service along Bayshore Drive is warranted.
During the course of this study, the public identified that CAT is currently considering this recommended measure
and the PIA would coordinate with any and all recommendations brought forth by Coiiier County.
9.2 Bus Shelters
An important consideration for all transit patrons is the condition of transit stop amenities. The PIA recommends
the construction of bus shelters at each CAT bus stop along the Orange Route 2 on 8ayshore Drive. These
bus stop shelters would proVide cover from the elements and proVide comfort and convenience for patrons,
promoting the use of transit. It is recommended that these shelters emulate the characteristics of the bus shelter
located at the northeast corner of Bayshore Dnve and Thomason Drive. These shetters would be designed to
enhance or integrate into the corridors streetscape and remain consistent with other COrridor amenities.
9.3 Bike Paths
The LRTP, Section 8.2, "Pathways" indicates that Shadowlawn Drive between Davis Boulevard and US 41 is
designated as a top priority for addition of bike lane faciHties f'v1ore than ten participants in the public workshop
indicated the need for similar facilities along the corridor Therefore. bike lanes and paths have been incorporated
into the PLA.
9.3.1 Purpose and Goal
Bike paths provide residents and visitors With a designated corridor where they can safely ride their bicycles.
The provision of such a facility separates bicycle traffic from vehicle traffic for Increased safety. Due to the
presence of a safe bicycling environment, reSidents and visitors are more likely to utilize bicycles for making
stlort trips within the study area This type of bike faciiity is recommended for Shadowlawn Drive between
C1av:s Boulevard and US 41,
.XI-
P,genda Item No. 178
iday 26, 2009
Page 36 of 159
Figures 8-1 and 8-2 graphically suggest the potential appearance of Shadowlawn Drive before and after
the construction of bike path amenities.
9.4 New and Widened Sidewalks
Several public outreach participants, dunng the rv;ay 2006 meetings expressed major concerns with the condition
of existing sidewalks Within the study area. Over 26 ;Jarticipants supported the impiementation or construction of
new or widened sidewalks
9.4.1 Purpose and Goal
The construction or widening of sidewalks within the study area is intended to provide residents and visitors a
comfortable and safe walking environment The sidewalk IS an Integral part of any neighborhood's streetscape
and functions as a meeting place for reSidents and visitors moving aiong the corridor. More importantly. the
sidewalk provides a safe place for pedestrian travel separated from vehicle traffic If no sidewalks are available,
residents and visitors are forced to walk within tile street in direct confilct moving vehicles.
9.4.2 BayshorelShadowlawn Corridor Study Area
The Pl.", recommends the construction of sloewalk Infrastructure. The majonty of these sidewalk Improvements
are recommended for streets located north of US 41. Baysho~e Drive. south of US 41 generally provides ample
sidewalks that integrate an aesthetically pleasing bnck paver design, enhancing the eXisting streetscape. For
locations where sidewalks improvements are recommended, a similar aesthetic quality could be integrated to
enhance neighborhood character ana aesthetics. To reduce construction cests, alternatives to the bricK oa\./ers
deSign could be considered';lternatives include colored or textured cancr'ete 01 stamped asphalt. The PIA
recommends the foliowing sidewalk HllprOVeme:lts
. Construction of a new flve- foot wide sidewalk along both sides of ConnecticutAvenue between Shadowiawn
Drive and Airport Pulling ~oad,
· Construction o~ a new five-foot wide sidewalk along bOTh sides of Linwood ,A,venue between Pine Street
and Airport Pulling Road,
· Construction of a nevv five-foot \Nlde Slde'Naik along both sides of Fr-an::s Avenue.
Construction of a nev, five-foot ''-''.'Ioe side'll/alk along both sides of ,t.,ndrew Dm/e rEJlih of US 41,
. CO'1struction of a new five-Tocit wide sldew2:k along both sides of Caledonia Avenue be!'"veen .Andrew
Drive and Airport Pulling Road.
e CO~istruction of a ne\J\1 five--Toot \f~i~de sldevva!k along ~oth si:-Jes of Pi;jelanj A,venue betvveen .b~ndrevy'
Drive and Airport Pulling ;:;oad.
· Construction of a new five-foot VI/ide Sidewalk along both sioes of Call1sa p,venu8 between Andrew Drive
and .L'.IIpori Puliing Road; and
· 'Widen the eXisting five-bot wide sidewalk to eight-feet wide along Doth sides or ShadowI8wn Drive
bst\.'V8en [iavis Bouievard and L;S 41.
Figures 9-1 and 9-2 graplllcally suggest the potential appearance of Linwood ,A,venue before and after the
construction of sidewalk amenities
-}-~ = -
Agenda Item No. 178
May 26, 2009
Page 37 of 159
;,< ',>,,-:.-,-,-:-,..,
Aftet ..
Sidewalk
Amenities
Source: CJ7"ter & Bureless, :nc. .:2006'
-x.-:;'
Agenda Item No. 17B
May 26, 2009
Page 38 of 159
9.5 Pedestrian Refuge
Pedestrian refuge areas are constructed within the roadway median to provide a safe location for pedestrians to
wait before crossing the remaining lanes of vehicle traffic These refuge areas are highly visible and shield or protect
the pedestrian from vehicles traveling along the corridor or turning onto local side streets and driveways.
9.5.1
Purpose and Goal
Crossing streets at uncontrolled (i.e., no traffic signal or STOP sign) intersection locations can pose a serious
risk to pedestrians. Adequate crossing gaps may be relatively infrequent on wide streets where vehicle volumes
and speeds are high. In addition, the driver may not see the pedestrian because the pedestrian is obscured by
a vehicle in another lane or other visual obstru:::tions. At night, crosswalks and pedestrians can be extremely
difficult for motorists to see in time to stop.
9.5.2 Bayshore Drive
The pedestrian refuge area is of particular importance along Bayshore Drive where pedestrians must cross
across four lanes of high-speed traffic, separated by a landscaped median. ;.,S indicated in Sections 2.0, the
majority of vehicles are traveling at or above the posted speed limit and none of the unsignalized intersections
on Bayshore drive provide pedestrian refuge in the median.
The PIA recommends the construction of pedestrian refuge areas that are clear of elements that might obscure
the presence of the pedestrian and that are lighted (theme lighting appli:::able) for visibility after dark. These
pedestrian refuges should also integrate seamlessly into the high-visibility crosswalk infrastructure described
in subsequent sections. Use of pedestrian refuges is not appropriate for Shadowlawn Drive or other streets
that do not have a center median. Construction Df pedestrian refuge areas are recommended for the following
locations under the PIA:
. Bayshore Drive at Week .Avenue
. Bayshore Drive at Bayview Drive,
· Bayshore Drive at Gulfview Drive,
. Bayshore Drive at Lakeview Drive,
. Bayshore Drive at Barrett Avenue,
.. Bayshore Drive at Van Buren Avenue,
. Bayshore Drive at VVindstar Boulevard: and.
· Bayshore Drive at Thomasson Drive
It should be noted that the pedestrian refuge areas at the intersection of Bayshore and Thomasson Drives
would be incorporated into the design of the recommended roundabout
Figures 9-3 and 9-4 graphicaliy suggest the potent,31 appearance of Bayshore Drive before and after the
construction of pedestrian refuge treatments
\, 1
-'l~r-
Agenda Item No. 178
May 26, 2009
Page 39 of 159
Refuge
Amenities
.,'-,., ."." '," . ."
'":, '--"-'."'".. >'-'" ,.' "'~"'i"_
'Pe'des!:rfa'.,
Refuge
Amenities
Source: Ci:lrter & r~l.Jrqe'5';., inc (2006)
-S5-
j:,genca Item No. 178
May 26,2009
Page 40 of 159
9.6 Pedestrian Safety Buffer
During the May 2006 public outreach efforts participants indicated a need for a pedestrian safety buffer. The PI.A
recommends the construction of a pedestrian guardrail along the western edge of the Andrew Drive and Calusa
Avenue intersection. This recommendation is intended reduce pedestrian/vehicle conflicts between students
and residents walking to the entrance of Shado\lvlawn Elementary School and vehicles traveling along Calusa
Avenue and Andrew Drive.
9.7 Pedestrian Yield Signs
Pedestrian yield signs are intended to alert motorists to the presence of pedestrians. especially at locations
where motorists may not expect to see pedestrians These signs increase the likelihood that a pedestrian would
have the benefit of a motorist yielding to him or her.
9.7.1
Purpose and Goal
The use of advanced pedestrian warning signs and yield signs are intended to reduce the number of vehicle
and pedestrian accidents with the study area These efforts to redu::e accidents, enhances the pedestrian
walking environment with safer neighborhood streetscapes that add to community character.
9.7.2 BayshoreiShadowlawn Corridor
The PI!e.. recommends the use of pedestrian yield signs at all unsignalized Intersections with pedestrian
crosswalks The sign Itself should be offset from the intersection to provide ample warning time for motorists
A.long the multi-lane 8ayshore Drive another sign at the Intersectian with lane markings should aiso indicate
advance stop lines, encouraging motorists to stop farther back from a crosswalk. When motorists stop too close
to a cross\J\,ta!k, their vehICles blod, the v!ew of pedestrians to drivers in adjacent lanes, and a multiple-threat
pedestrian crash could result VVhen motorists stop farther back. sight distances improve between pedestrians
and drivers in adjacent lanes, aiiowing them a better opportu:-Iity to avoid a crash.
It is recommended that each Intersection wllere pedestnan crosswalk facilities are located would include
additional lighting to Illuminate the crosswalks at night. .Additional signage should also be prOVIded to alert
peclestnans to be aware of oncoming vehicle traffic. reduc;ng the false sense of safety a pedestrian may
experience at higt1 visibility crosswalk locations
9.8 Lighted School Crosswalk
;:', lighted pedestrian cross....Jalk IS Intended to aiert motorists of the presence of pedestrians. especially at school
crosswalk locations where motorists may not expect to 8ee children crossing the street This crosswalk element
consists of flashing lights embedded into the roadway on both Side of the crosswalk and should be coordinated
vvith peak school activity' periods.
9.8.1
Purpose and Goal
L~ghted school cross\.\'s!ks are intended to reduce the nurr.ber of \/ehlc:e and pedestrian accidents \vlth the
study area. These efforts enhance the pedestnan walking environment by providing safer neighborh::Jod
streetscapes.
- ~)I),
Agenda Item 1\10. 17B
May 26, 2009
Page 41 of 159
9.8.2 Bayshore/Shadowlawn Corridor
The PIA recommends replacing the existing school crosswalk in front of the Shadowlawn Elementary School
with a lighted crosswalk. Flashing, strobe-like, lights would be activated when a pedestrian trips sensors at
either entrance to the crosswalk. These sensors could be calibrated to be actuated by elementary-school-aged
children and during peak school activity periods. Power supply to operate the flashing lights and sensors can
be supplied to the unit via a small solar panel array connected to a battery located within the vicinity of the
crossvva!k. It should be noted that this recommended improvement vIas identified in the final public meeting on
December 14, 2006, as a measure that should be implemented in several other locations where high visibility
crosswalks have been recommended.
Figures 9-5 and 9-6 graphically suggest the potential appearance of Shadowlawn Drive before and after the
construction of a lighted school crosswalk.
9.9 High Visibility Crosswalks
High visibility crosswalks are defined as pedestrian crosswalks that use high visibility markings on the roadway
to alert motorists to the presence of a pedestrian crossing. It is recommended that textured or stamped asphalt
also be used to further enhance the visual impact and aesthetic appeal of the crosswalk.
9.9.1
Purpose and Goal
Similar to other modal amenities identified, the purpose of the high visibility crosswalk is to reduce the number
of vehicle and pedestrian accidents. These efforts to reduce accidents enhance the pedestrian walking
environment and provide safer neighborhood. The recommended use of textured or stamped asphalt provides
increased awareness to the presence of the crosswalk while adding an additional aesthetic amenity that can
significantly enhance the streetscape.
9.9.2 Bayshore/Shadowiawn Corridor
The use of high visibility crosswalks is recommended at several intersections along the corridor. At the
recommended implementation of a roundabout style intersection at Thomason Drive at Bayshore Drive, these
crosswalk elements would be incorporated Into the deSign of the roundabout. High-visibility crosswalk elements
are recommended at the following locations:
· Davis Boulevard and Shadowlawn Drive,
· Linwood ,cwenue and Shadowlawn Drive.
· Francis Avenue and Shadowtawn Drive,
· Caledonia Avenue and Shadowtawn Drive.
. Calusa Avenue and Shadowlawn Drive
· US 41 and Shadowlawn Drive,
· Week Avenue and Shadowlawn Drive.
· Bayview Drive and Shadowiawn Drive,
· Gulfview Avenue and Shadowlawn Drive.
· Lakeview Avenue and Shadowlawn Drive.
· Barrett';venue and Shadowlawn Drive. and.
· Van Buren Avenue and Shadowlawn Drive.
Figures 9-7 and 9-8 graphically suggest the potential appearance of Shadowlawn Drive before and after the
construction of high visibility crosswalks.
-;;)7-
Aaenda Item No. 17B
~ May 26, 2009
Page 42 of 159
l'\.l
-l"n~-
Agenda Item No. 17B
May 26, 2009
Page 43 of 159
ter
Crosswalk
Amenities
Source: C~ner &. Burqes~, lnc (2006\
-WI-
Agenda Item ~~o. 178
May 26, 2009
Page 44 of 159
10.0 RECOMMENDED DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
In an effort to maintain consistency with the transportation analysis, the following drainage section and the
resultant recommendations are based on comparisons between the eXisting condition and two future condition
assessments. The following describes the three conditions in detaiL
.fn -f r::~:_.,.:_~ r'__-J;.,.:~_~ A ________4
IV.' '-A,;:tU"!:I ....VtlUIUUIl;;:, M:;":;,,t::::';;:'IIIt::lfL
1 0.1.1 Study Area North of US 41
The study area north of US 41 is defined as the area bounded by US 41 (Tamiami Trail) to the south. Davis
Boulevard to the north and Airport-Pulling Road to the east. Over the past several years, this area has been
identified as experiencing significant flood events during even routme rainfall events. Development over the
years has hydraulically isolated this area from pOSitive drainage discharge. There are several small connections
to the piped systems along Davis Boulevard and US "11, but these systems do not provide significant discharge
since they are over capacity.
In the eastern portion of this area including and adjacent to Shadowlawn Drive, drainage of the existing
roadways is accomplished by either closed storm drain systems or existing roadside ditches. Shadawlawn
Drive, between DavIs Boulevard and US 41, utilizes roadside ditches. ditch bottom inlets, storm drain segments
and side drains to collect and convey stormwater runoff south to the US 41 offsi:e outfall system that runs
parallel to the US 41 storm drain system. The ultimate outfall is ~~aples Bay The majority of side streets in
the study area utilize roadside swales to convey the,r minor runoff ta these larger systems. No stormwater
management is presentl}' prOVided (treatment or attenuatiOn) for S'iadowlawn Drive or side streets within the
iMmedia:e study area
10.1.2 8ayshore Drive
Bayshore Drive, from US 41 south to Thomasson Dt-iv8, utiilzes a closed storm drain system. conSisting of
cUI-b inlets and pipes to collect and convey stormwater runoff to its outfall Lake Kelly Ditch. The majority of
side streets In the study area utilize roadSide swales to convey their minor runoff to these larger systems No
stormvvater management is presently piovided (treatment or attenuation) for 3ayshore Drive or Side streets
v/ithln the immediate study area.
10.2 2015 Future Baseline Condition
10.2.1 Study Area North of US 41
In 20GS, HDR Inc conducted an ar~alysis of the eXisting CJndltlons (Histone Dramage Conditions AnalYSIS
F<:eport) and proposed improvements for the existing drainage system within thiS area (Gateway Triangle
Draina[l(? ImprovemRnt f~er)ort) of C:oiiier C:ou1ty. Proposed :;T1provements Included ut)grading the existing
stor:Twater conveyance system and the construction of a regional storlllwater facility In an effort to allev,ate
the extreme flooding III the C';ateway Trian;;le. Collier County has purchased property to cor.struct a 6-acre
pond and ;s seeking to expand thiS faciiity In the future to provide additional stormwater relief In order to
provlde positi'v'e discharge frorn the .jete~tio'l/retention facility to ~\~3p!es Bay, the facility \.vill include a duplex
pump station. This pump station wiP convey stormwater rundf via a 3D-inch force mai0 outfall. which is to
r.le c:nn~trurted \Mithin the Pin'? Str'eet :3:~d ~!nv\'cod .l:,\'enu~ ;igh~~-of-v.',3Y. The 30,in~h f8ice :T1z:n v..'il! :hen
tee at the intersection of Linwood Avenue and Conmerc:al Drive The northern branch \,'Jill con1inue as a 24-
inch fmce main aiong the east slce 0': Commerc:a! Drive cress Davs Boulevard. 2nd outfall int::! the eXisting
. q: l_
Agenda Item No. 17B
May 26, 2009
Page 45 of 159
gravity system on the west side of Brookside Drive. The southern branch of the outfall (14-inch force main)
will continue south down Commercial Drive, cross US 41, and outfall into the existing gravity system on the
west side of Palm Avenue. Future projects are planned to improve the stormwater collection and gravity
conveyance system to the pond. The current design of the regional stormwater facility would alleviate flooding
conditions primarily in the western and central portions of this area. However, it is expected to have minimal
impact on the immediate study area.
10.2.2 Bayshore Drive
The only significant drainage improvement project proposed for Bayshore Drive and the surrounding area is
the Haldeman Creek Dredging project. Forty thousand cubic yards of material will be dredged. leaving 2 to
3 feet of water at low tide on the west side of the Bayshore Drive Bridge. The dredging project will run from
U.S. 41 East, including the finger canals, to where Haldeman Creek connects with Naples Bay. The primary
purpose of the project is to improve boater navigation and access and enhance water quality and flow. The
expected completion date is February 2007.
10.3 2015 Future Development Condition
10.3.1 Preferred Improvement Alternative (PIA)
Drainage improvements are limited to the infrastructure necessary to construct the recommended improvement
elements included in the PIA. These improvements are primarily reiated to the addition of curb and gutter along
Shadowlawn Drive and valley gutter along Connecticut, Linwood, Francis, Andrew Drive, Pineland, Calusa and
Caldonia Avenues. Converting from open to closed conveyance systems will require the construction of inlets
and pipes in order to collect the stormwater and convey it to the approphate outfall
Although no additional travel lanes are proposed under the PIA. an environmental resource permit will likely be
required to meet water quality and quantIty standards. Under water quality requlf'ements, the project should
compensate for filling in the existing ditches. The loss of treatment volume within these ditches must be
replaced. Under water quantity standards, the project should provide attenuation for the slight increase in
discharge due to the increased impervious area (curbing and Sidewalk). It is estImated that a stormwater
management facility (SMF). approximately 2.0 acres In Size, would be required. 8ased on Laser Imaging and
Detection and Ranging (UDAR) contour information, the most hydraulically appropriate locations for this SMF
would be west of Shadowlawn Drive, along Francis .A.venue or Linwood Drive. AdditionaHy, the possibility of
expanding the Regional Stormwater Facility d!s:::ussed previously could be explored.
10.3.2 Further Analysis Required
As the PIA moves toward design, additional information would be required to properly design the storm drain
systems, outfalls and stormwater management facility:
· Utility information, including riOrizontal and vertical location, would be required in order to determine the
location of the storm draIn system and the need for utility relocation
· Survey Information and geotechnical data (soil borings and seasonal high water elevation) would be
required to properly design the stormwater management facUity. once an appropriate site is chosen
· Location and elevatIOn of outfaHs would be required in order to properly deSign the storm drain systems
along Shadowlawn Drive and the side streets
it should be noted that the drainage elements in-:::.luded in the PIA dO not address the current flooding probienis
'Nithm the immediate study area. A detailed study would be reqUIred in order to propose improvements which
_ (i I -
p,genda item f'>Jo. 178
May 26, 2009
Page 46 of 159
would alleviate flooding in the future. The drainage improvements proposed in the PIA, ensure that the elements
of the PIA can be constructed and permitted.
-(;~-
Agenda Item No. 17B
May 26, 2009
Page 47 of 159
11.0 CONCLUSION
The PIA uses recommended improvement strategies, developed through public participation, to decrease the
volume and speed of cut-through vehicle traffic within the study area. The PIA also aims to maintain mobility
along the Bayshore/Shadowlawn corrrdor and reduce the likelihood of vehicle/pedestrian conflicts. The primary
goal of these improvement measures is to provide a more livable and cohesive neighborhood.
11.1 Summary of Recommendations
After evaluating public comments, travel demand forecasts, and intersection LOS analyses; the PIA includes
the physical re-configuration and signal timing plan revisions to all signalized study area intersections. These
recommendations would effectively increase intersection capacity, improving operations and mobility along the
BayshorelShadowlawn Drive corridor. The identification of future parking needs is also included in the PIA.
The PIA qualitatively and quantitatively considers the impact of recommended transportation improvements
and traffic calming measures. As a result, the construGtion of a roundabout, access management guidelines,
and school access strategies are recommended. Traffic calming techniques recommended by the PIA include
gateway treatments with roadway neck-downs and speed enforcement.
The PIA identifies several aesthetic amenities which would create a sense of place and connectivity between
neighborhoods, north and south of US 41 These recommendations include landscaping, street furniture, themed
lighting, and others. Modal amenities such as transit service, bus shelters, bike paths, sidewalks. and crosswalks
in conjunction with aesthetic amenities would provide a safe. pedestrian-friendly, and cohesive neighborhood.
11.2 Implementation of Recommendations
The implementation of the PIA improvement measures requires careful consideration to design, capital cost,
drainage, and maintenance. .A cost consideration combined with the improvement measure's perceived
effectIveness provides a basis for prioritization
11.2.1 Capital Cost
Table 11-1 summarizes a few of the approximate capital costs for several improvement measures. The
approximate cost ranges have been extrapolated from information provided by the Florida Department of
Transportation (FDOT) and do not include the cost of acquiring parcels of land or right-of-way. Appendix
o provides a detailed description of approximate cost by location and specific element. Each capital cost
estimate is based on approximate infol"1"nation wtlich was readily available in December 2006 and does not
reflect future market driven cost changes. These capital cost estimates would also reqUire detailed engineering
and design considerations to determine actual cost. Recommendations not described in the table are generally
elements that have too great a range of cost to accuratety approximate. Factors that influence this rnability to
approximate cost include design, quality of materials used, andior iabor.
Special Cost Considerations for Roundabout
P.s Indicated In Tables 11-1 and Table D-3 (Appendix D). the approximate cost for the construction for
a roundabout at this intersection would be between $135.000 and $150,000. This cost estimate does not
Include right-of-way acqUisition costs. .t\s indicated by Collier County Property Appraisers Office. the current
average (2006) cost per acre of iand within thiS portion of the study area is approximately $15 per square
foot L'srng a conservative v/orst case scenario. it has been assumed that an additional 1/4 acre of right-of-
_l){_
Agenda Item r~o. 176
May 26, 2009
Page 48 of 159
apl a os ummary
Improvement Measure Total Approximate Cost ($)
VVlden SJdewa!ks 108.000-257.000
Cons1rucl New Sidewalr:s -- ~- 75000. 201000
Bike Paths 1.018000 - 1 .272 .500
Speed Er1fo~cer'T2~t--=-==~==- 2.0CiO iper monthmer locatloni
Pedestrian Safety Buffer ------,2.506 - 15.500
Drainaoe (construction of retentI9~JiJ__ ,86000 - 232.500
"-~------_."--_._-_...__._--_.._----,._----
Pedestrian Yield Slqns 12.500 - 15.500
Drainaoe (curb & Qut,!,ElrL_______________ ____:Ie 811c~r~Q_-_Z.?_6LQQQ______.
J?~~n5g.~_( '/a lIel'_~~~~L_____ ---.--..-.- 4.218.000 - :'.272 500
'-~-----._--_._---
_f:il~_\:,I!:!~~!tx.f!D~.S,,!21~~ -'----."---'- ~5}_,~QQ_~_.~.~~:_~.<J~______
Lane Resuipinq 5.000, 6.5DO
Turnlnq Lane Capacity 75.000. 100.000
Roundabout 134.500 - 159.000
Table 11-1
Recommended Improvements'
C "t let s
Source Car.er & Burgess >:2005)
way would need to be acquired to successfully implement the proposed roundabout and all its approaches.
A multiplier of six to eight is generally applied to the cost of acquisition to cover damages and litigation. As
a result the total approximate cost to Implement the proposed roundabout at this location would be between
$1.000,000 and $1,130,000 (10.890 sq. ft. @ $15 x 6 + construction cost). Comparatively, a signal with mast
arm at this intersection location would cost approximately S250.000.
11.2.2
Prioritization of improvement Measures
The identification of an improvement measures impact on the PiA and subsequent cost to implement are
the basis for prioritizing each measure. .,0.-5 shown in Table 11-2, each measure was ranked by comparing its
potential benefit to cost ratio. The improvement measures which require the least capital and have the greatest
benefit to the study area are recommended to be implemented fIrst and are shown at the top of Table 11-2.
The improvement measures which require the most capital and have the least effect on the study area are
located toward the bottom of Table 11-2. The more costly Improvement measures could be implemented last
or constructed in phases over longer time periocls
The potentia! benefits of each improvement measure were given qualitative numerical rankings for the fo!lowing
categories:
· Safety impact.
· Enhance vehicle mobility.
. Enhance vehicle access,
. Bike and pedestrian mobility,
· Aesthetic enhancement,
· Traffic catnling benefIt: and,
· Pubiic support.
The public support category was completed by publiC participants In attendance at the final public presentation,
held December 14, 2006. At thls final public presentation, participants were asked to indicate their improvement
measure preferences. Results were then added to Table 11-2.
The potential costs associated With each irnpr 0\Jernent measure were qualitatively ranked by a capita! cost and
m:::')int,::::.,n::.nr;::. ("'-~t~n("')rio~
.. .-.. ..-. .-. .~- --.-::;,-' '---
.q~-
Agenda Item No. 178
May 26, 2009
Page 49 of 159
rt is important to note that drainage improvements (see Section 10.0) are required to support the construction
of several improvement measures. For example, improvement measures such as improved streetscapes with
landscaping, street furniture, sidewalks, and other aesthetic or modal amenities described in Sections 8.0 and
9.0 would all require drainage infrastructure support. As a result drainage improvement measures described
in Section 10.0 are not included in Table 11-2.
In summary (Table 11-2), improvement measures are recommended for ImplementatIon according to cost!
benifit ranking as follows:
1) School Access
2) Pedestrian Yield Signs
3) Access Management
4) Reduce Speed Limit
5) Landscaping Line of Sight
6) Pedestrian Safety Buffer
7) Lighted School Crosswalk
8) Gateway Treatments/f\leckdowns
9) Pedestrian Refuge
10) High \jisability Crosswalks
11) Construct Sidewalks
12) Themed Lighting
13) Bike Paths
14) Speed Enforcement
15) Widen Sidewalks
16) Bus Shelter
17) Roundabout at Thomasson/ Bayshore
18) Landscaping and Sidewalk Furniture
19) V,sual Screening
20) Extended Transit Route
-',)':;-
rY'i:.J)G)
~OL()
~o~
0":'0
z~o
_ LD
a3 ~ (J)
:::=:2 g'
C1l 0...
~
OJ
::n
<(
If)
~
;;
<II
<l>
::e
C
<l>
E
Q)
:>
o
~
't:I
Q)
"E
~
E
o
U
ll>
0::
'0
o
~
a::
~
c:
Q)
CD
en
o
u
N
~
~
ll>
:3
'"
I-
<;;
0
u .2 <> <> '" :;l 5 <> <0 - '" g C> '"' m "" .., ., '" "'
;e Ri '" '" .., ~ N <> ... C> '" '" '"' <> ,-
1! ~ :! :: wi g g ...: ..; wi ,..; ... ,.; ,.; ,.; ".; ,.; ...
a::
OJ;
ID
<;; <;; Q ~ c,
~ - " " '" " 0, ~ In '0 '0 '" "- '" ~ '" ,-", "- m ~
0> ~ -
U
'"
u
c:
ro <;; 0
c:
01 0 S!- o 0 '" 0 r~ r-" " I, '" ~ ~, " I"'~ ill C.. " v v v v
c: u
'n;
:E
"3 - c;-
5- <to ("J '" " c., N ,,; " v l.f) 0:', v ~. N I.V r, .n <.:. I
0 S!- O'-
J u
~ "" C;- ., '"' '" .., - '"' '" '" ,., ~, " ..., In ..,. '" In " '" u,
'" ..... '" 0> .,. '" .,. ,.., f?; ~ ~ '" "" ,. ;; g; '" ~:j 0; ~ .-
0> ;: ~ r, .., ,.., .., .., " ... .., ., '" '" '" ., -
.... '"
ID
."' t:
0 c;- ,,. N ~ (~" '"'J C( ~ .-. '" '.' ,. ~ - .:'1 ,. ~
:s Q. .... r. " c:) ID ~0 "" (f) " .....-;. '" ", 'D 0 ::-.:. 0.-:1
:::> :;, 6 .. a ,. n
"- V; ..
U .~ ;;:: c;-
:E ~ - I" '..0 ~... "' C" ~ '.f: ~. "' ,. .0 Iw"'"; '" ' (~ "' m " ,.., ~.
'" ;;:; 2- u' .'" r, ...., U'1 :,:,
.= '"
u III
.;2 .;,
~ u i: u:;-
C Ln ,,-, ..", U' "' U' ~. Ln on "'
<;; -E '" 2- 0 ~ u c.' 1'1 " c, r, ~ ,~ Ct c.J ., ... lJ: ... 0
'" E
<( Li:i
"C ~ I I
01 u:;-
CL. "' u ", IF " ~'.' .- IJ";
Q; :.0 I ... I' -' c. ("J \~', ", ,,-; ,n c., ,.."; .'
"" 0 2- ("'; '---J ". f'"" ., .' -. or", '_:;l .,
2i ::;;
01 '" '"
u
I ~ '" u:;-
~ 01 ", ;::' f'': U, ". u' .:- " . Lt. . . ~. .:" .- ...-' ',C> - .n .. [.,.., ..
U S!- ,~ r, n f":,-) ,...~ r '. .. "" :.-,
~ .:; ..
UJ'>
I
i::' I
:-= tt;'
.0 . -,
0<::>
:;: I
!
;"J ,n
, C>
~ OJ
-~ ~
-"tl
I~ >
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
,r, ".
('<
i:'wo
Il' ~ (""W
~ES
.~ :;"
,~ ~
o:.d.~
l~:'-: ,:r!
C'") -T r_,
r'J
'--..I :Y) ....J Ln 'c:: ,~
.E
"'"'
.0
~, 50
a' S
"2
i '"
.~
g
0
u ~
OJ
ex:: <:( I
'"
'" ~
;J"J I
~ :;
~ c.
'"
QJ
~ if'
-0 C
.g C' ..
~ I '"
'" l':~
~ ~ if.' u:
,n
a> ~~
". I'"
~ ,'.::: '!:'
1 (.l In
;:-) IL
7-. .",
Q)
IY' '-'
r-;
<:> cv
<:. cy
7- a-."
i..:". :i:-
t" ::J
~,:' '':j 1D
- ~ r
~T' 2
2 ~: ~'0
c
'!!
O::J
n
-,,,, l ~
'(u Q\
If if,
'J!
T
-;;,
~ -
;:~ -~
(-h ;;:)
t,', ~:
",. ~l~
~> c',')
..
~ .:r; :~
q, :q
- ::;,
_l_)h_
I
I
I
.,1
.~
..J
~
;"r,
~
'"
'J)
:-~ ~
,....j
:~ -
comm
r~::::>1.[)
_-o~
N_
. 0
-~.,-
I.[)
E >. (!)
CllCCC))
==2:cc
CC n..
:;2
Q;
01
<t:
,...-
=\ t--.. III Ii,>
~l-~
8 ~)' ~~_i! z
-7 \...,-, === == :::::= ~
H -= = = = = 1=
~8-<-:iT'~ iiiT ,T T T T rr
, ;;:
"0
::>
:!
..
'"
..
:!
'"
~d
"-~
<
'" ~
~ r
.,. "II IX: ,~
~
~
~
..
~~ ~ ~
~ : i
r--
Z
-.r ~~
~l= en 0
4f: 9
1-, '--
==
0 ! OJ
'"
< g
. gg
o " " ~ :0
::> ~ "1
Cl. ~ ~
@ "
II Cl.
'"
I
).A.II:lO 3tlOHSAva
I '
z
"
::>
~ .~
~.~~
~ 3 8
(OVOII A11])I
'+g
~~<(t\
a:
~
~-
~
:;
~ 0\ \1 ~ I
6 LV.t1 ~~;
~ ~(c=J.
) A'" ~.;=l= 1-- I-
A "n.... ~<~~ - c:<.~
- ...P 'i .
/ /' I ---e 1-1- <I- - 51-
/ 1--"1-
L I L~ an 8-. ~ H
~t= @:
g~I---"" "! I-
"il- .In r\ Llj-
f\ I ! r I I Iii ';n~". . .
~ ~ ~ /1'0(~~'O ",i ~t\\
i~;'~ \ ~~ ::>~,
~~~ /N :::c<'\~\{(\'---. ~ "~~ I
'-'
":~~
C..):J
~
ii'
;
j
I~
11
~.
I,
,
r-
I
,
~
111,1.1
g ~
Q.. t
-L
---If
~
..
J,
c,
::>
CI.
:0
1--
~I ~
~I
,=====t::
=====1=
= == == ~
===:;::=1=
,=~- -i-fii--zr- 0
<+--:r- [
:;
~
..
"'
'"
I~
~. ~
I
I/O ]1I0HSA...e ~ lli
zr=
<~
r::::
.,
u:.
'"
'"
;
i
~
."".
f-'
~,
~
~
L_I '" r----
::>
c. I
f' I I ::;
I :;;1
..... ~~ ~I~
I
[(i. f1 I I
.; g ~Ii I
llBi I
Q.. ~I:Z: I I
I -- ~
5~.
~~~
., -
"
Oti3BftlllJ.ll-W
!lIf3BN3ll.....
'!lNIQHY1
<V~~ ISII3lIdSO
~~~
~5~
,-- ;,~ -
~ 5l~~
~88~ 1Il
~ ~~5
~~ ;3~
~
gg
""
~~
~S
~
G1J1J
]l'<f:>5 0.. iON /
-
z-
~
~
w
~
:!l
/----
)1.1CO
j,\f.
of
-
a..
<(
~
CJ
z
z
o
N
N
Cl
r-
'"
,
a::
<(
,
co
o
o
N
II
<(
o.
::J
CLI
=It I
21
~I
twl
o.i
I
I
a..
<(
~
z
o
I-
<(
u
SI
j..genda item No. i 78
May 26. 2009
?age 52 of 159
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
DEPT. OF ZONING & LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
WWW.COLLlERGOV.NET
(i)
2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
(239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-6968
APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC HEARING FOR:
~ AMENDMENT TO PUD (PUDA) 0 PUD REZONE (PUDZ)
(PUDZ-A)
o PUD TO PUD REZONE
PETITION NO (AR)
PROJECT NAME
PROJECT NUMBER
DATE PROCESSED
ASSIGNED PLANNER
To be completed b.v stafr
APPLIeANT INFORMATION
NAME OF APPLlCANT(S) Naples Botanical Garden, Inc.
ADDRESS 4820 Bayshore Drive, Suite D CITY Naples STATE FL ZIP 34112
TELEPHONE # 239-643-7275 CELL #
FAX # 239-649-7306
E-MAIL ADDRESS: bholley@naplesgarden.org
NAME OF APPLlCANT(S) Florida Gulf Coast University Foundation, Inc.
ADDRESS 10501 FGCU Boulevard South CITY Fort Myers STATE FL ZIP 33965
TELEPHONE # (239) 590- 1067 CELL #
E-MAIL ADDRESS: jshepard@fgcu.edu
FAX # (239) 590-1070
1
l\ppllcatlDn For Public lJeanng For PlID Rezone OJ') H'07, rev 2'12lJH. rev 7'IIOS
Agenda Item No. 17B
May 26, 2009
Page 53 of 159
NAME OF AGENT R. Bruce Anderson; Roenel and Andress
ADDRESS 850 Park Shore Drive, Third Floor CITY Naples ST ATE FL ZIP 34103
TELEPHONE # 239-649-2708 CELL #
FAX # 239-261 -3659
E-MAIL ADDRESS:banderson@ralaw.com
NAME OF AGENT Margaret Perry, AICP; WilsonMiller, Inc.
ADDRESS 3200 Bailey Lane, Suite 200 CITY Naples STATE FL ZIP 34105
TELEPHONE # 239-649-4040 CELL # FAX # 239-643-5716
E-MAIL ADDRESS:margaretperry@wilsonmiller.com
BE AWARE THAT COLLIER COUNTY HAS LOBBYIST REGULATIONS. GUIDE YOURSELF
ACCORDINGLY AND ENSURE THAT YOU ARE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THESE REGULATIONS.
ASSOCIA TIONS
Complete the following for all registered Association(s) that could be affected by
this petition. Provide additional sheets if necessary. Information can be found
on the Board of County Commissioner's website at
http://www.collien::Jov.net/lndex.as px?paQe=77 4
NAME OF HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION: East Naples Civic Association, Inc.
MAILING ADDRESS Aftn: Mr. Tom Cannon, President; 3823 Tamiami Trail East, PMB 284 CITY Naples
STATE FL ZIP 34112
Disclosure of Interest Information
a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety,
tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest
as well as the percentage of such interest. (Use additional sheets if necessary).
Name and Address
Percentage of Ownership
2
Application For PublIc Hcanng For PL,O Rezone 01:18/07, rev 2/12/08, rev 7/1 1/08
Agenda Item ~~o. 178
fv'lay 26, 2009
Pace 54 of 159
b. If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stocknolders
and the percentage of stock owned by each.
Name and Address
Percentage of Ownership
Naples Botanical Garden, Inc., a not-for-profit corporation: N/A
Directors: Lindo White, Richard Benson; Catherine Ware,
Charles Berger, Juliet Sproul, James lagrippe
Florida Gulf Coast University Foundation, Inc., 0 not-for-profit N/A
rnrnnrntinn
--" ,--- -..-..
Duane Stranahan, President; Peter Sulick, Vice President;
Donald lesch, Secretory; Stephen Mcintosh, Treasurer;
Joseph Catti, Director; Fay Biles, Director
c. If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with
the percentage of interest.
Name and Address
Percentage of Ownership
d. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the
name of the general and/or limited partners.
Name and Address
Percentage of Ownership
e. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a
Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers
below, including the officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners.
Name and Address
Percentage of Ownership
Date of Contract:
f. If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all
individuals or officers; if C! corporation, partnership, or trust.
Name and Address
3
Application Fell Public I Iealillg For pun Rezone 011 f),Oj. rev 2,' i 2'()8. rev 7:'11/08
g.
Date subject property acquired ~ April, 2000 and February,
Term of lease yrs.fmos.
Agenda Item No. 17B
May 26, 2009
Page 5?-.qf 159
2006 leased U
If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following:
Date of option:
Date option terminates: , or
Anticipated closing date
h. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur
subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public
hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a
supplemental disclosure of interest form.
PROPERTY LOCATION
Detailed le2al description of the propertv covered hv the application: (If space is inadequate,
attach on separate page.) If request involves change to more than one zoning district, include
separate legal description for property involved in each district. Applicant shall submit four (4) copies
of a recent survey (completed within the last six months, maximum 1" to 400' scale) if required to do
so at the pre-application meeting.
NOTE: The applicant is responsible for supplying the correct legal description. If questions arise
concerning the legal description, an engineer's certification or sealed survey may be required.
Section/Township/Range 23/ 50 South /25 East
Lot:
Plat Book
Block:
Subdivision:
Page #:
Property 1.0. #: 00395560200
Metes & Bounds Description: Please see attached legal description.
Size of property:
ft. X
ft. = Total Sq. Ft.
Acres 171
Address/generallocation of subject property: 4820 Bayshore Drive; Naples, FL 34112
PUD District (LDC 2.03.06): D Residential L8J Community Facilities
D Commercial D Industrial
4
Application For Public Hearing For PUD Rezone 0 II 18/07, rev 2/1 2108, rev 7/11108
f'\genda Item No. 17B
May 26, 2009
Page 56 of 159
ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE
Zoning
land use
N RMF-6-BMUD-Rl & R2
RMF-6-BMUD-NC; C-3-BMUD-NC
S MPUD, RMF-6-BMUD-R 1
RSF-3-BMUD-R 1
E RMF-6-BMUD-Rl, R2,
multi-family and single family units; undeveloped property
single family residence; undeveloped property
commercial, residential, church
VR-BMUD-R3, RSF-3-BMUD-R 1 & R4,
C-2, 3 & 5-BMUD-NC
W PUD, RMF-6, RSF-4-BMUD-Rl, C-3
residential (Palmetto Court, Southpointe Yacht Club &
Windstar); vacant commercial
Does the owner of the subject property own property contiguous to the subject property? If
so, give complete legal description of entire contiguous property. (If space is inadequate,
attach on separate page). No.
SectionJT owns hip JRange
J
J
lot:
Block:
Subdivision:
Plat Book
Page #:
Property 1.0. #:
Metes & Bounds Description:
REZONE REQUEST
This application is requesting a PUD amendment to allow for modifications to the PUD document,
deviations from the LDC and providing an updated PUD Master Plan.
Present Use of the Property: Naples Botanical Garden
Proposed Use (or range of uses) of the property: No changes to the approved uses are proposed.
Original PUD Name: Naples Botanical Garden Ordinance No.: 03-29 and 04-38
EVALUATION CRITERIA
Pursuant to Section 10.02.13 of the Collier County land Development Code, staff's analysis and
recommendation to the Planning Commission, and the Planning Commission's recommendation to the
Board of County Commissioners shall be based upon consideration of the applicable criteria noted
below. Provide a narrative statement describing the rezone request with specific reference to the
criteria noted below. Include any backup materials and documentation in support of the
request.
PUD Rezone Considerations (lDC Section 10.02.13.B)
5
Application For Pubiic Hearing Por PLJD Rezone 011 g,'Oj, rev 2;' i 2,'08, rev 7'] ]:08
Agenda Item No. 178
May 26, 2009
Page 57 of 159
1. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to
physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer,
water, and other utilities.
This less intensely developed location within the urban area has been the ideal
location for the creation of the Naples Botanical Garden. As a result of the early
success of the Naples Botanical Garden (NBG), there is momentum to continue the
development of this previously approved PUD and provide programs and resources
to accommodate the growing County population, tourists and visitors.
The Naples Botanical Garden PUD was approved in 2003. At that time, it was
determined that this location was suitable for construction of a botanical garden and
associated uses. A great deal of community education and activity has occurred on
this site over the past few years. This current request for a PUD amendment will
allow for modifications to the current PUD document to revise design guidelines and
transportation-related conditions. Additional changes proposed include deviations
from the LDC related to fencing and walls and revisions to the PUD Master Plan.
The proposed amendment remains compatible with the surrounding community and
other existing land uses. There will not be an increase in density or intensity as a
result of these proposed modifications. The Garden will continue to be compatible
with the surrounding neighborhood and there will be no increase in noise, lighting,
odor or infrastructure needs as a result of these requested deviations and
mod ifications.
2. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contract,
or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to
arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such
areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Findings and
recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the county attorney.
The applicant believes that the submittal documents provide evidence of unified control.
3. Ccmformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives and policies of the growth
management plan. (This is to include identifying what Sub-district, policy or other provision
allows the requested uses/density, and fully explaining/addressing all criteria or conditions of
that Sub-district, policy or other provision.)
The existing Naples Botanical Garden (NBG) PUD was determined to be in conformance with
the Growth Management Plan (GMP) at the time of PUD approval in 2003. The proposed
modifications to this existing PUD are compatible with the adjacent Sub-district
Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Overlay. NBG is outside of and adjacent to
the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Overlay. The NBG attracts visitors and
residents to the Bayshore arts corridor and redevelopment area. The NBG has established
strong partnerships with the CRA and other organizations in the neighborhood including
Avalon Elementary School and East Naples Community Park. The GMP Future Land Use
Element F. Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Overlay states that "The intent of the
redevelopment program is to encourage the revitalization of the Bayshore/Gateway
Triangle Redevelopment Area by providing incentives that will encourage the private sector
to invest in this urban area." Although NBG is outside of and adjacent to the Bayshore
6
Application For Public Hearing For PUD Rezone 0]iI8/07, rev 2/12/08, rev 7/11/08
Agenda Item No. 17B
fvlay 26, 2009
Paoe 58 of 159
overlay district, it has triggered a large amount of private investment and improvements that
have brought benefit to the CRA and surrounding neighborhoods.
In addition to being consistent with the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Overlay,
the NBG is consistent with FLUE Policy 4.7 and Policy 5.4, compatible and complementary to
surrounding land uses and the Bayshore redevelopment area. The proposed modifications
will not change the current compatible and complimentary nature of the NBG and the
surrounding neighborhood.
4. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include
restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening
requirements.
This previously approved PUD is a compatible neighbor to the existing single-family and
multi-family homes that surround the Gorden. In addition, NBG serves as the southern anchor
of the County's Bayshore Drive redevelopment efforts. NBG is a unique and peaceful
neighbor and will continue to provide design, buffering and screening that blends seamlessly
between the gorden's tropical vegetation and the adjacent residential neighborhood.
Property improvements will be designed to enhance the diverse tropical and sub-tropical
gardens and the overall neighborhood.
No changes are proposed with regard to the location of improvements. Deviations are
requested regarding design guidelines and transportation-related conditions. However,
there will be no negative impacts from noise, lighting or odors and the proposed deviations
will enhance the serene, peaceful environment within and adjacent to the garden. As an
example, the applicant's request to locate fencing within five feet of the property line will
provide better security for the Garden and the adjacent neighbors by discouraging the
establishment of homeless camps within the preserves and heavily vegetated areas of this
lorge, 171 acre site.
S. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the
development.
Only small tracts of this 171 acre botanical garden ore developed with structures for
education and research facilities, parking lots and maintenance buildings. The vast majority
of the acreage will remain as usable open space for the benefit of the garden visitors and
the adjacent neighborhood.
6. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available
improvements and facilities, both public and private.
This PUD amendment does not impact the timing or sequence of development. Adequate
public and private facilities hove been built and will continue to be provided as outlined in
the PUD document with the exception of requested changes to transportation-related
conditions H., H. 1-3. and J., J.1 - 4 in the PUD document
7. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion.
The Naples Botanical Garden PUD is 171 acres which provides the ability to continue its
growth and expansion. There is adequate property to expand and meet the growing needs
of the community, provide for educational research, generate tourism and meet others goals
of the NBG. There is no physical expansion of the PUD proposed in this amendment.
7
Applicallon For PubliC Jleanng For I'll!) Ronne 01 IK07. rcv 2 12 ilK. rev 7, II,UK
Agenda Item No. 17B
May 26, 2009
Page 59 of 159
8. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the
particular case, based on determination that such modifications of justified as meeting public
purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations.
This PUD amendment requests modifications to the 2003 PUD document and deviations from
the LDC in order to address changing conditions.
The applicant is requesting modifications to the traffic-related conditions in the PUD
document. A Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) was prepared in October 2007 which
accompanied a site development plan application. The TIS indicates that the "only turning
movement volumes that meet the County's turn lane warrant criteria are the southbound right-
turning volumes along Bayshore Road, and only when the total southbound right-turning
traffic volumes are considered in the aggregatej..." The applicant purposes to provide a
turn lane for southbound right-turning vehicles at the primary access point on Bayshore Drive
(main visitor parking area). The applicant requests elimination of transportation conditions
J.1., J. 2., and J. 4 as these are not warranted based upon the 2007 TIS. The turn lone
described in existing condition J.3. has been re-written as J. and will be provided pursuant to
the LDC and the SDP approval. In addition, the applicant requests the elimination of H. 1-3.
which requires a 5-foot wide sidewalk along the length of the property on Hamilton Avenue
and Thomasson Drive. A sidewalk exists on the north side of Thomasson Drive adjacent to
existing residential developments. A sidewalk also exists on the west side of Hamilton
Avenue adjacent to existing residential. There will not be any additional residential
developed on the east side of Hamilton Avenue or on the south side of Thomasson Drive. The
existing sidewalks have been and continue to be adequate to serve pedestrians in this
neighborhood. Pedestrians have access to sidewalks adjacent to existing residential
development along Hamilton Avenue and Thomasson Drive. NBG is accessible by pedestrians
at both the Thomasson Drive entrance and on the west side of Bayshore Drive.
The applicant would also request that the transportation condition requiring a sidewalk along
the west side of Bayshore Drive (the PUD's eastern property line) be reconsidered. A
sidewalk placed on the east side of Bayshore Drive, located adjacent to existing residential
homes, would provide better pedestrian access and safety for local residents. The Naples
Botanical Garden will pay its proportionate payment in lieu of a sidewalk on Bayshore Drive
but believes that pedestrian access and safety would benefit greatly by locating the
sidewalk to the east side of Bayshore Drive.
Two residential developments have been approved by the Board of County Commissioners
on the north side of Thomasson Drive both west and east of Bayshore Drive. The applicant
has indicated a willingness to coordinate with these approved developments and the
Bayshore CRA to address safe pedestrian travel in the immediate vicinity of the NBG. The
Garden has offered payment in lieu to the Bayshore CRA for future sidewalks to be
coordinated by the CRA and County Transportation with the development of new residential
communities on the north side of Thomasson Drive at Bayshore Drive.
The applicant is requesting three deviations from the LDC for decorative wall/fence material,
height and location placement. The NBG requests a deviation from LDC Section 5.03.02.
A.1.a.i to allow chain link fence setback five (5) feet from the public right-of-way. A
deviation from Section 5.03.02.A.1.a.ii.(a) to allow a chain link fence to be permitted at a
height of five (5) feet and a deviation from Section 5.03.02.E.2. requiring a masonry wall or
prefabricated concrete wall and/or fence next to the out-parcel located on the west side of
Bayshore Drive. The adjacent property owner, Mr. Scott Kapnick, does not wish to have a
8
Application For Public Hearing For PlID Rezone 01/18/07, rev 2/12/08, rev 7/] 1/08
Agenda Item No. 178
["1ay 26. 2009
Paqe 60 of 159
wall/fence installed around his property, therefore a deviation is requested. Enclosed'is a
letter from Mr. Kapnick concurring with this requested deviation. See Exhibit A.
A masonry wall or prefabricated concrete wall and/or fence is required for the out-parcel
located east of Bayshore Drive if that property is developed as part of Naples Botanical
Garden and for the outparcel on Thomasson Drive.
See the separate sheet for requested deviations from the LDC.
Deed Restrictions: The County is legally precluded from enforcing deed restrictions, however, many
communities have adopted such restrictions. You may wish to contact the civic or property owners
association in the area for which this use is being requested in order to ascertain whether or not the
request is affected by existing deed restrictions.
Previous land use petitions on the subject property: To your knowledge, has a public hearing been
held on this property within the last year? D Yes ~ No
If so, what was the nature of that hearing?
Official Interpretations or Zoninq Verifications: To your knowledge, has there been an official
interpretation or zoning verification rendered on this property within the last year? 0 Yes ~ No
If so, please provide copies.
Attached is a copy of Administrative Variance AVA-2008-AR-13075 for an alternative fence design
approved on April 15, 2008, Exhibit C.
NOTICE:
This application will be considered "open" when the determination of "sufficiency" has been made
and the application is assigned a petition processing number. The application will be considered
"closed" when the petitioner withdraws the application through written notice or ceases to supply
necessary information to continue processing or otherwise actively pursue the rezoning for a
p""riod of six (6) months. An application deemed "closed" will not receive further processing and
an application "closed" through inactivity shall be deemed withdrawn. An application deemed
"closed" may be re-opened by submitting a new application, repayment of all application fees
and granting of a determination of "sufficiency". Further review of the project will be subject to
the then current code. (LDC Section 10.03.05.Q.)
9
Application For Public Hearing For PUD Rczone OJ IS/07. rev 21208. rev 71 !"()8
........-
ST A TEMENT OF UTILITY PROVISIONS
FOR PUD REZONE REQUEST
Agenda Item No. 17B
May 26, 2009
Page 61 of 159
APPLICANT INFORMATION
NAME OF APPLlCANT(S) Naples Botanical Garden, Inc.
ADDRESS 4820 Bayshore Drive, Suite D CITY Naples STATE Fl ZIP 34112
TELEPHONE # 239-643-7275 CELL #
FAX # 239-649-7306
E-MAIL ADDRESS: bholley@naplesgarden.org
NAME OF APPLlCANT(S) Florida Gulf Coast University Foundation, Inc.
ADDRESS 10501 FGCU Boulevard South CITY Fort Myers STATE Fl ZIP 33965
TELEPHONE # (239) 590- 1067
CELL #
FAX # (239) 590-1070
E-MAIL ADDRESS: jshepard@fgcu.edu
ADDRESS OF SUBJECT PROPERTY (IF AVAILABLE): 4820 Bayshore Drive, Naples, Fl 34112
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Section/Township/Range 23 / 50 South / 25 East
Lot:
Plat Book
Block:
Subdivision:
Page #:
Property I.D. #: 00395560200
Metes & Bounds Description: Please see attached legal description.
TYPE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL TO BE PROVIDED
(Check applicable system):
a. COUNTY UTILITY SYSTEM
b. CITY UTILITY SYSTEM
c. FRANCHISED UTILITY SYSTEM
PROVIDE NAME
c. PACKAGE TREATMENT PLANT
(GPD capacity)
d. SEPTIC SYSTEM
LR1
D
D
D
D
TYPE OF WATER SERVICE TO BE PROVIDED
a. COUNTY UTILITY SYSTEM
b. CITY UTILITY SYSTEM
c. FRANCHISED UTILITY SYSTEM
PROVIDE NAME
d. PRIVATE SYSTEM (WELL)
o
LR1
D
D
10
Application For Public lIearing for PUD Rezone 0]/18/07, rev 2'12/08, rev 7/1l/08
STATEMENT OF UTILITY PROVISIONS - page 2
Aaenda item No. 17B
~ May 26, 2009
Page 62 of 159
TOTAL POPULATION TO BE SERVED: 1500 visitors/day
PEAK AND AVERAGE DAilY DEMANDS:
A. WATER-PEAK 21 gpm AVERAGE DAilY 7550 gpd
B. SEWER-PEAK 21 gpm AVERAGE DAilY 7550 gpd
IF PROPOSING TO BE CONNECTED TO COLLIER COUNTY REGIONAL WATER SYSTEM,
PLEASE PROVIDE THE DATE SERVICE IS EXPECTED TO BE REQUIRED
Not Applicable, potable water service provided by City of Naples Utilities
NARRATIVE STATEMENT: Provide a brief and concise narrative statement and
schematic drawing of sewage treatment process to be used as well as a specific
statement regarding the method of affluent and sludge disposal. If percolation ponds
are to be used, then percolation data and soil involved shall be provided from tests
prepared and certified by a professional engineer.
Not Applicable, sanitary sewer service provided by Collier County Utilities
COLLIER COUNTY UTILITY DEDICATION STATEMENT: If the project is located within
the services boundaries of Collier County's utility service system, written notarized
statement shall be provided agreeing to dedicate to Collier County Utilities the water
distribution and sewage collection facilities within the project area upon completion of
the construction of these facilities in accordance with all applicable County ordinances
in effect at the at time. This statement shall also include an agreement that the
applicable system development charges and connection fees will be paid to the
County Utilities Division prior to the issuance of building permits by the County. If
applicable, the statement shall contain shall contain an agreement to dedicate the
appropriate utility easements for serving the water and sewer systems.
Not Applicable, all onsite water and sewer facilities will be owned and maintained by the
Naples Botanical Garden, Inc.
STATEMENT OF AVAilABiliTY CAPACITY FROM OTHER PROVIDERS: Unless waived
or otherwise provided for at the pre-application meeting, if the project is to receive
sewer or potable water services from any provider other than the County, a statement
from that provider indicating that there is adequate capacity to serve the project shall
be provided.
See enclosed availability of service letter from the City of Naples; Exhibit B.
11
'\pplication For Public Hearing For I'LL) Rezone 01) g'07. rev 212'()g. rev 7'1] 'Og
AFFIDA VIT
Agenda Item No. 17B
May 26, 2009
P.go 03 of /159
We, Brian Holley, Executive Director, Naples Botanical Garden, Inc. and Dr. Joe Shepard,
Assistant Treasurer, Florida Gulf Coast University Foundation, Inc. being first duly sworn, depose
and say that we are the owners of the property described herein and which is the subject matter
of the proposed hearing; that all the answers to the questions in this application, including the
disclosure of interest information, all sketches, data, and other supplementary matter attached to
and made a part of this application, are honest and true to the best of our knowledge and belief.
We understand that the information requested on this application must be complete and accurate
and that the content of this form, whether computer generated or County printed shall not be
altered. Public hearings will not be advertised until this application is deemed complete, and all
required information has been submitted.
As property owners we further authorize R. Bruce Anderson of Roetzel & Andress and Margaret
Perry of WilsonMiller. Inc. to act as our representative in any matters regarding this Petition.
Signature of Property Owner
Signature of Property Owner
Brian Holley. Executive Director
Naples Botanical Garden, Inc.
Typed or Printed Name of Owner
Dr. Joe Shepard. Assistant Treasurer
Florida Gulf Coast University Foundation, Inc.
Typed or Printed Name of Owner
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of
200----, by who is personally known to me or has produced
as identification.
State of Florida
County of
(Signature of Notary Public - State of
Florida)
(Print, Type, or Stamp Commissioned
Name of Notary Public)
12
Application For Public Hearing For PLIO Rezone 0\!18/07, rev 2/12108, rev 7/1 1/08
.Agenda Item r'Jo. 17B
Iv1ay 26, 2009
Page 64 of 159
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of
200------, by who is personally known to me or has produced
as identification.
State of Florida
County of
(Signature of Notary Public - State of
Florida)
{Print, Type, or Stamp Commissioned
Nnm.. nf Nntnrv P"hlir\
. .-...- -. . --.--. I . --..-,
13
Application For Public Hearing For I'UD Rezonc OlilK07. rev 2'12c'OB. rcv 7"1 ji()B
COVENANT OF UNIFIED CONTROL
Agenda Item r~o. 17B
May 26, 2009
Page 65 of 159
The undersigned do hereby swear or affirm that we are the fee simple titleholders and owners of record ofpropeliy
commonly known as Naples Botanical Garden
4820 Bayshore Drive, Naples. FL 34112
(Street address and City. State and Zip Code)
and legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto.
The property described herein is the subject of an application for community facility planned unit development
(CFPUD) zoning. We hereby designate Brian Holley. Executive Director. Naples Botanical Garden. Inc.. and Dr.
Joe Shepard, Assistant Treasurer. Florida Gulf Coast University Foundation. Inc., legal representative thereof, as
the legal representatives of the property and as such, these individuals are authorized to legally bind all owners of
the property in the course of seeking the necessary approvals to develop. This authority includes, but is not limited
to, the hiring and authorization of agents to assist in the preparation of applications, plans, surveys, and studies
necessary to obtain zoning approval on the site. These representatives will remain the only entity to authorize
development activity on the property until such time as a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to
Collier County.
The undersigned recognize the following and will be guided accordingly in the pursuit of
development of the project:
1. The property will be developed and used in conformity with the approved master plan including all conditions
placed on the development and all commitments agreed to by the applicant in connection with the planned unit
development rezoning.
2. The legal representative identified herein is responsible for compliance with all terms, conditions, safeguards,
and stipulations made at the time of approval of the master plan, even if the property is subsequently sold in
whole or in part, unless and until a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to and recorded by
Collier County.
3. A departure from the provisions of the approved plans or a failure to comply with any requirements,
conditions, or safeguards provided for in the planned unit development process will constitute a violation of the
Land Development Code.
4. An terms and conditions of the planncd unit development approval will be incorporated into covenants and
restrictions which run with the land so as to provide notice to subsequent owners that all development activity
within the planned unit development must be consistent with those terms and conditions.
5. So long as this covenant is in force, Collier County can, upon the discov'ery of noncompliance with the terms,
safeguards, and conditions of the planned unit development, seek equitable relief as necessary to compel
compliance. The County will not issue pennits, cel1ificales, or licenses to occupy or use any part of the
planned unit development and the County may stop ongoing construction activity until the project is brought
into compliance with all terms, conditions and safeguards of the planned unit development.
Owner
Owner
Brian Holley. Executive Director.
Naples Botanical Garden, Inc.
Printed Name
Dr. Joe Shepard. Assistant Treasurer
Florida Gulf Coast University Foundation. Inc.
Printed Name
14
Application For Public Hearing For PUD Rezone Ol/l8.!07. rev 2!l2/O8, rev 7/1l/08
STATE OF FLORIDA)
COUNTY OF ~
Agenda Item No. 178
May 26, 2009
F'age 66 of 159
Sworn to (or affirmed) and subscribed before me this
day of
,200_ by
who is personally known to me or has produced
as identification.
Notary Public
(Name typed, printed or stamped)
(Serial Number. ifany)
STATE OF FLORIDA)
COUNTY OF
Sworn to (or affimled) and subscribed before me this
day of
,200_ by
who is personally known to me or has produced
as identification.
Notary Public
(Name typed, printed or stamped)
(Serial Number, if any)
15
Application For Public Heanl1g For PU!) ReZllI1t' 0]'18:07. rev 2.12'08. rev 711:08
PUD AMENDMENT (PUDA)
Agenda Item No. 17B
May 26, 2009
Page 67 of 159
PUD REZONE (PUDZ)
PUD to PUD REZONE (PUDZ-A)
APPLlCA TION
SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST
THIS COMPLETED CHECKLIST IS TO BE SUBMITTED WITH APPLICATION PACKET IN THE EXACT ORDER LISTED
BELOW WfCOVER SHEETS ATTACHED TO EACH SECTION.
NOTE: INCOMPLETE SUMBITTALS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED.
#OF NOT
REQUIREMENTS COPIES REQUIRED REQUIRED
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS:
1 Additional set if located in the BayshorefGateway Triangle
Redevelopment Area)
Copies of detailed description of why amendment is necessary 24 [8J 0
Completed Application with list of Permitted Uses; Development Standards Table; List 24 ~ 0
of proposed deviations from the LDC (if any); List of Developer Commitments and
Statement of Compliance narrative
(download application from website for current form)
Pre-application meeting notes 24 ~ 0
PUD Conceptual Master Site Plan 24" x 36" and One B V2" x 11" copy 24 ~ 0
Revised Conceptual Master Site Plan 24" x 36"and One B V2" x 11" copy 24 ~ 0
Original PUD document/ordinance and Master Plan 24" x 36" - ONLY IF 24 ~ 0
AMENDING THE PUD
Revised PUD application with changes crossed thru & underlined 24 [8J 0
Revised PUD application w / amended Title page w /ord #'s, LDC 10.02.1 3.A.2 24 [8J 0
Justification/Rationale for the Deviations (must be on a separate sheet within the 24 [8J 0
application material; please DO NOT include it in the PUD documents)
2 Copies of the following:
Deeds/Legal's & Survey (if boundary of original PUD is amended) 2 ~ 0
List identifying Owner & all parties of corporation 2 ~ 0
Owner/Affidavit signed & notarized 2 [8J 0
Covenant of Unified Control 2 [8J 0
Completed Addressing checklist 2 [8J 0
4 Copies of the following:
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and digital/electronic copy of EIS or exemption 0 [8J
justification 4
Historical Surveyor waiver request 4 0 [8J
Utility Provisions Statement w / sketches 4 [8J 0
Architectural rendering of proposed structures 4 0 [8J
Survey, signed & sealed 4 [8J 0
Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) or waiver (with applicable fees) 7 0 [8J
Recent Aerial Photograph (with habitat areas defined) min scaled 1 "=400' S [8J 0
Electronic copy of all documents in Word format and plans (CDRom or Diskette) 1 [8J 0
Copy of Official Interpretation and/or Zoning Verification 1 i [8J 0
If located in RFMU (Rural Frinae Mixed Use) Receivina Land Areas
Applicant must contact Mr. Gerry J. Lacavera, State of Florida
Division of Forestry @ 239-690-3500 for information regarding
"Wildfire Mitigation & Prevention Plan", LDC Section 2.03.0B.A.2.a.(b)i.c.
]6
Application For Puhlic Hearing For PUD Rezone 01/18/07, rev 2112/08, rev 7111!08
Applicant/Agent Signature
Date
i\genda Item i'~o. 178
May 26, 2009
Page 68 of 159
Exhibit B
LIST OF REQUESTED DEVIATIONS FROM LDC
A deviation is requested from LDC Section 5.03.02. A.1.a.i to allow a chain link fence setback
five (5) feet from the public right-of-way.
Rationale
A need exists to install a chain link fence within 5-feet of the property line in order to
minimize the number of homeless camps that have been established on this heavily
vegetated property. Fencing within 5-feet of the property line will provide better
security for the garden and the adjacent neighbors by discouraging the
establishment of homeless camps within the preserves. In addition, the use of a
chain link fence will allow for a vegetated buffer to blend more seamlessly with the
existing vegetation than a solid fence.
A deviation from Section 5.03.02.A.1.a.ii.(a) to allow a chain link fence to be permitted at a
height of five (5) feet
Rationale
A four -foot (4') high fence will not provide adequate security for this facility. The
Naples Botanical Garden functions as an outdoor museum and as such requires
that admissions be controlled and the facilities secured when the Garden is not
open. The applicant proposes to install a five-foot (5') high, chain link fence along
its perimeter within five (5) feet of the property line in order to adequately secure the
facility. The additional height will assist in providing better security for this facility
and adjoining residential property.
A deviation from Section 5.03.02.E.2. which requires masonry wall or prefabricated concrete
wall and/or fence between residential and nonresidential. The applicant proposes to provide a
masonry wall or prefabricated concrete wall and/or fence next to the out-parcel located on
Thomasson Drive. A masonry wall or prefabricated concrete wall and/or fence is required for
the out-parcel located east of Bayshore Drive if that property is developed as part of Naples
Botanical Garden. No masonry walls or prefabricated concrete walls and/or fences are required
along the out-parcel located on the west side of Bayshore Drive.
Rationale
An adjacent property owner, Mr. Scott Kapnick, does not want a wall/fence installed
around his property. The applicant would request a deviation from the installation of
a wall or fence on the southeast side of the Garden adjacent to Mr. Kapnick's
property. Enclosed is a letter from the property owner concurring with this
requested deviation.
17
/\pplication For Public Hearing FUi pun Rt:ZUiH: OL'lS,'07, rev 2:12/()8. ICV 7:1 LOS
Agenda Item No. 17B
May 26, 2009
Page 69 of 159
ORDINANCE NO. 09 -
AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 03-29, THE NAPLES
BOTANICAL GARDEN PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
(PUD), BY AMENDING SECTION 4.14, DESIGN GUIDELINES;
SEenON 6.2, DEVELOPMENT P AR..A....METERS; SECTION 6.4,
PERMITTED USES AND STRUeTURES; SECTION 6.5
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS; AND SECTION 7.2,
TRANSPORTATION OF THE PUD DOeUMENT FOR THE
NAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN; BY ADDING SECTION 7.6
TO PROVIDE FOR DEVIATIONS FROM THE LAND
DEVELOPMENT CODE AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTNE
DATE.
WHEREAS, on June 24, 2003, the Board of County eommissioners approved Ordinance
No. 03-29, which established the Naples Botanical Garden Planned Unit Development (PUD);
and
WHEREAS, said Ordinance Number 03-29 was previously amended by Ordinance
Number 04-38 and approved by the Collier County Board of County Commissioners on June 22,
2004 to correct a scrivener's error.
WHEREAS, R. BRUCE ANDERSON, representing Naples Botanical Garden, Inc.,
petitioned the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, to amend Ordinance
03-29, as amended, the Naples Botanical Garden Planned Unit Development.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA that:
SECTION ONE: Section 4.14, Design Guidelines, of the PUD Document for the Naples
Botanical Garden is amended as follows:
4.14 Design Guidelines
Words struck through are deleted; words underlined are added.
Page 1
A,genda Item ~Jo. 17B
May 26. 2009
Page 70 of 159
A. Development of structures wIthin the Naples Botanical Garden PUD, due to their unique
characteristics in a natural setting, shall comply with the Purpose and Intent Section of
Di','ision 2.8 Section 5.05.08, Architectural and Site Design Standards of the LDC~
amended, only. Structures within the Naples Botanical Garden PUD will not be
consistent with the actual architectural guidelines of Diyision 2.8 Section 5.05.08 as
amended. The applicant will follow the alternative compliance process for review of
architectural and design standards as outlined in Section 5.05.08.F. of the LDC as
amended, to allow for innovative design of structures within Naples Botanical Garden,
except that maintenance, interim or temporary structures do not require architectural and
design standard revie\\'. The applicant shall comoly \s/lth Section 4.06.05 FOll...TJ.dations
Plantings of the LOC for interim or temporary structures as well as the maintenance
structures. HO'Never, the following requirements saaH apply:
1. Structures shall comply with Section 2.8.2.5, Non Commercial Development of
the LDC.
2. Struetures Ghall comply '.vith Sctltion 2.8.5, ExeeptionG and Interprtltaiions of the
LDC ""here necessary to allo'.\' for innovative design of struetures within Naples
Botanieal Garden.
B. Decorative walls and/or fencing shall be provided in accordance ""ith the standards of
Section 2.6.11.4.2 5.03.02.E.2 of the LDC. At a minimum, the two out-parcels depicted
on the PUD Master Plan and the overflow parking and/or potential future expansion area
on the east side of Baysnore Drive shall meet the requirements of Section 2.6.11.1.2
5.03.02.E.2 of the LDC for a decorative wall.
SECTION TWO: SectIOn 6.2, Development Parameters, of the PLID Document for the Naples
Botanical Garden is amended as follows:
6.2 Development Parameters
The POO Master Plan, Exhibit "A", depicts the proposed use areas. The maximum development
intensity is based on a floor area ration (F.A.R.) of .05 which translates to a maximum square
footage of 372,438 square feet. Institutional, recreational, administrative, research and
educational facilities, accessory retail and housing uses including other support facilities are
included uses within the 372,438 square feet. Within the allotted development intensity there will
be a 200 seat cafe within a 5,000 square foot structure and indoor and outdoor seating areas. An
accessory retail use area of up to 5,000 square feet shall also be permitted within the entrance
building. Dormitory housing for the research center also is included within the total maximum
permitted floor area. Interim or temporary structures may be used to provide the facilities
described in Section 6.4. A temporary use permit is not required, and the interim or temporary
structures shall be approved through the site development plan process.
SECTION THREE: Section 6.4, Permitted Uses and Structures, of the PUD Document for the
Naples Botanical Garden IS amended as follows:
6.4 Permitted Uses and Struchlres
No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land use, in whole or
in part, for other than the foIlo\ving:
Words struck through are deleted; words underlined are added.
Page 2
Agenda Item No. 17B
May 26, 2009
Page 71 of159
A. Principal Uses:
1. Arboretta and botanical garden (group 8422)
2. Amusement and recreational services (natural wonders and tourist attraction: commercial
only) and exhibition operation (group 7999)
3. Non-commercial research organizations (group 8733)
4. Commercial, physical and biological research (group 8731)
5. Commercial, economic, sociological, educational research (group 8732)
6. Auditoriums
7. bterim or temporary structures to provide the principal and accessory uses. The interim
or temporary structures shall be allowed for an initial period ofthree (3) years. If needed.
requests for extensions for uses of the interim or temporary structures beyond three (3)
years may be approved administratively for two (2) three (3) year extensions utilizinl!: the
insubstantial change to the approved SDP process. Requests for additional extensions
may be approved by the Board of County Commissioners through the public petition
process. Certificates of occupancy for a permanent structure will not be issued until the
interim or temporary structure housing: a particular use is removed from the site.
SECTION FOUR: Section 6.5, Development Standards, of the PUD Document for the Naples
Botanical Garden is amended as follows:
B. Minimum Setbacks
A minimum setback of fifty (50) feet shall be maintained on all sides of the property for
principal structures. However, the existing administration building located at the
intersection of Bayshore Drive and Thomasson Drive shall be permitted a minimum
setback of fifteen (15) feet from Bayshore Drive after the optional conveyance of right-
of-way for the widening of Bay shore Drive. The interim or temporary structures shall be
set back a minimum of three hundred (300) feet from the property line along Bavshore
Drive. five hundred (500) feet from the property line along Hamilton Avenue and the
southern property boundary and one hundred fifty (50) feet from the property line along
Thomasson Drive. Maintenance structures along Bayshore Drive shall be permitted a
minimum setback of thirty (30) feet. Accessory structures shall be set back twenty (20)
feet from property lines where landscaping buffers are required.
SECTION FIVE: Section 7.2, Transportation, of the POO Document for the Naples Botanical
Garden is amended as follows:
H. The developer shall provide 5-foot wide sidewalks inclusive of bike lanes along the
length of its property limits on Fern Street, Thomasson Drive and along Bayshore Drive
from Thomasson Drive to the out parcel located on the west side of Bayshore Drive
opposite Republic Drive consistent with LDC provisions and the following:
1. All sidewalk and bike lane design criteria used shall be in accordance with the
Minimum Standards, as adopted by the Florida Department ofFDOT - Design
Standards, as amended, as required by Florida Statutes - Chapter 316, Uniform
Traffic Control Law.
Words struck through are deleted; words underlined are added.
Page 3
Aasnca item NO.1/'8
~ May 26, 2009
72 of 159
2. The developer shall provide a 5-foot wide sidewalk along the length of its property
limits on Fern Street, Thomasson Drive and on Bayshore Drive from Thomasson
Drive to the out parcel located on the west side of Bavshore Drive Ii point opposite the
overflow parking lot. Pursuant to the provisions of the Land Development Code, the
developer shall provide a payment of $78,125.00 (based upon FDOT standards) in
lieu of constructing a sidewalk along the east side of Hamilton Avenue and a sidewalk
along the west side of Bavshore Drive from the out parcel opposite Republic Drive to
the preserve area. This payment in lieu will be used for sidewalk improvements along
Bavshore Drive as part of the Bavshore Drive South improvement proiect. Five-foot
wide sidewalks shall be constructed in accordance with County Standards. No
sidewalk nor sidewalk mitigation shall be required where Bayshore Drive abuts a
preserve area.
3. Phase I \vill include a side';lalk aleRg the '."lest side of Bayshore Drive fr'6ffi Bayshere
Drive and Thomasson Drive te the pr-ojeet's mam entranEle. Another side\\'alk ""rill be
pro'ridea along the south side of Thomasson Driye from the interseotion of
Thomasson Driye and Bayshore Dflye to the existing eHtranee into the })arking lot.
All other sidewalks shall be pro'.<iaed in two (2) year increments as each phase is
oompleted and not to eXl:leed a total period of six (6) years.
I. The developer. his successors, or assigns shall provide a fair share contribution toward
the capital cost of a traffic signal and turn lanes (or alternative intersection roundabout
design) at the intersection of Bavshore Drive and Thomasson Drive at such time that the
improvements are constructed. Payment shall be provided to the applicable Public
agencv(ies) responsible for designing and constructing the improvements. if justified by
appropriate traffic '..varrants.
J. The developer(s) shall provide a separate right turn Jane on Bavshore Drive for the
southbound to westbound traffic movement into the Main EntranceNisitor Parking Area.
aRe! all site related traRsportatian im}'lrovement(&) m.eluding, but Bot limited to, any and
all TIeeessary turn lane(s) improvemclflt(s) at the development entrantJe(s) prioc to the
issuanoe of the fIrst permaneFlt CO. Said improvements are considered site related, and
therefore, do not qualify for impact fee credIts. When sald turn lane improvement(s),
whether left turn lane(s) and/or right turn lane(s), are determined to be necessary, right-
of-way and/or compensating right-of-way, shall be provided in conjunction with said
improvement(s), as determined by the Collier County Transportation Staff. Tho subject
development turn lane impro':ements shall be as follows:
1. On the Viest approach of ThomasseB onve, the separate left turn lane for the
eastbound to northbound traffic movement onto Bayshore Drive shall be lengthened
as required to facilitate left turns at this interseotion for vehicles exiting onto
Thomasson Dri ','e.
2. On the south approach of Bayshore Driye, un additional lane for northbound traffio
shall be provided to faciiitate through, left turn and ri;ht tU!Tl movemeFlts at
~0m&G:;an Dri';e. 111is additionallttne :o.h.i:lll e.1{tond south from Thomasson Drive to
the Main Entranoe/Visitor Parking ,'\rea (approximately 960 feet).
3. On thc north approach of Bay shore Driye. a sepfi1ate rigk turn lane for the
southbound to westbound traffic movement into the M.ain Entrance/Visitor Parking
Area shall be pro':idcd.
Words struck through are deleted; words underlined are added.
Page 4
Agenda Item No. 17B
May 26, 2009
Page 73 of 159
4. On the south approach of Baysnare Drive, a i'leparate left turn lane for the northbound
to \vestbound traffic movement into the Main Entnmee/Visitor Parking :"rea shall be
provided if said improvement 15 detemLmed neeesso:ry after the overflow parkmg
faoility on the east side ofBaysflore Dri'le is improveGlepened.
.b-K. All turn lane design criteria shall be in accordance with the minimum standards as
adopted by the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) - Design Standards, as
amended, as required by Florida Statues - Chapter 316, Uniform Traffic Control Law.
The turn lane queue length determinations shall be in accordance with the
criteria/calculations within the Highway Capacity Manual- Chapter 17.
M-1. All work within the Collier County right-of-way shall meet the requirements of Collier
County Right-of-Way Ordinance.
N-M. Ifa gate is proposed at any and/or all development entrance(s), the gate shall be designed
so as not to cause vehicles to be backed up onto any and all adjacent roadways. Gates
shall be recessed a minimum of 50 feet from the edge of the public roadway for the
main/visitor's entrance; the research/education entrance and overflow parking entrances
and/or potential future expansion area. Gates at other locations shall be a minimum of 25
feet from the edge ofthe roadway.
SECTION SIX: The PUD Document for the Naples Botanical Garden is amended to include new
Section 7.6, Deviations from the LDC, as follows:
7.6 Deviations from the LDC
1. Deviation from LDC Section 5.03.02.A.I.a.i. Chain link fence shall be permitted to
be constructed at the preserve boundary on the southern property line and chain link
fence shall be permitted and set back a minimum of ten (J 0) feet from the public
right-of-way. except when located adiacent to a preserve where the setback shall be a
minimum of five (5) feet.
2. Deviation from LDC Section 5.03.02.A.1.a.ii.(a). Black chain link fence shall be
permitted at a height of five (5) feet. If the applicant opts .to use the black chain link
fence it may be used along the southern property line. Thomasson Drive and Hamilton
Avenue. and the portion of Bay shore Drive where the preserves are located.
3. Deviation from LDC Section 5.05.08. Maintenance. interim or temporary structures
do not require architectural and design standard review.
SECTION SEVEN: The POO Master Plan for the Naples Botanical Garden PUD is as indicated
on Exhibit "A," attached hereto.
SECTION EIGHT: Effective Date.
This Ordinance shall become effective upon receipt of notice from the Secretary of State that this
Ordinance has been filed with the Secretary of State.
Words struck through are deleted; words underlined are added.
Page 5
Aoenda item f'lo. 178
~ May 26, 2009
Page ~'4 of i 59
PASSED MTI DUL Y ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County,
Florida, this day of ,2009.
A TIEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
BY:
, Deputy Clerk
DONNA FIALA, Chairman
Approved as to Form and
legal Sufficiency
STEVEN T. WILLIAMS '5"~
Assistant County Attorney 1{.7'Oq,
Attachment: Exhibit A - PUD Master Plan
Words struck through are deleted; words underlined are added.
Page 6
COClJ(j)
I'-OLD
..-..0"'-
"'\1-
_ 0
;,!)
-N~
E >>Cl)
Cl)coO)
==~co
~ Q..
c
Cl)
0)
<{
g
~ ~ II~ ~ ~ : II
r "I" ~, !!
fj' i
~~..I....~
!!.~~:;~~~~
~i '-..-l:
i
~ ~ I
il !.'l!~ I
~13
i.:ll! : ~ : II
,;'< >l .". Ii
Ii I
~Ai: ::::1
3 :i~ 1ft ......: - !I
f' _..:~
~ I !
II; I~i
h~n2
~g ~ n ~ f
l:J
~~
a E:i'l!:ll
,.,
~
~
wl/l
~ ~ ~=
i ~ r~d
,.l!i .y"
iil 'd
~ F~
~ ~ Sfili
ll! ~ ~I~d!h
~ ~ ~h~::!
~ ~ r.. ~
~
~
i i ~
~ liB I
~dHIII
mDD~~~~
--'=' z-
'I
'.....
i
--~~-
~ ~ ~
I ~ ~ ~
~
~
if s~lh h
~ u ~~ I ~i:; ~~
!, U !i! i~~ ~i
~ a~:al ~~
I
"
"
"
r
ti
i
i.
"
.
J_
I
-I
,'1
, ...;
a I
:J. i
~f
.1..
8'
3 ' .
,
CL . '
0: a'
'"
l-
i
c:i
:;;
a:
~
u
:;:;
g i
~ 5
~ ~
~ g
o
'" III
III ~
i z
! I
; I !
kll
., ~
IH!
. I
f I
I I
. I
I :
I
I
I ;-
,
I"
jf
! I
II I Ii
Agenda item No. 17B
fv'1ay 26, 2009
Page 76 of 159
c.o'1lt:-r c.oUff.t:y
~ ~-~
Memorandum
To:
John David Moss, AICP, Principal Planner, Department of Zoning & Land Development Review
From:
Carolina Valera, Principal Planner, Comprehensive Planning Department
Date:
October 6, 2008
Subject: Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Consistency Review.
PETITION NUMBER: PUDA-2008-AR-13792
PETITION NAME: Naples Botanical Gardens
REQUEST: An amendment to the Naples Botanical Gardens PUD document to modify Section 4.14,
Design Guidelines, and Section 7.2, Transportation. In addition, this amendment petition seeks approval
of three deviations from Sections of the Land Development Code (LDC) that regulate fence material,
height and setbacks.
LOCATION: The subject PUD, consisting of :t161 acres, is located at the southwest corner of the
intersection of Bayshore and Thomasson Drives and 10.:t acres of the site is located on the east side of
Bayshore Drive approximately 2,200 feet south of the intersection of Bayshore Drive and Thomasson
Drive, in Section 23, Township 50 South, Range 25 East.
COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING COMMENTS: The subject property is located within the Urban
designated area (Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict and Bayshore/Gateway
Triangle Redevelopment Overlay), and is within the Coastal High Hazard Area, all as identified on the
countywide Future Land Use Map of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). This district is intended to
accommodate a variety of residential and non-residential uses including parks, open space, recreational
uses, and community facilities.
Within the Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict, and in order to facilitate hurricane evacuation and to protect
the adjacent environmentally sensitive Conservation designated area, residential development is
permitted at a maximum density of four (4) units per acre, except as allowed in the by certain FLUE
Policies and in the Bayshore Triangle Redevelopment Overlay. However, properties in the Naples
Botanical Garden PUD, as described in the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Overlay of the
FLUE, are limited to non-residential uses, except for caretaker, dormitory, and other housing integrally
related to the Botanical Garden or other institutional and/or recreational open space uses.
The subject PUD is approved for recreational and open space uses, and accessory commercial and
residential uses, which are consistent with those allowed in the Urban Coastal Fringe.
Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 states: "New developments shall be compatible with, and
complementary to, the surrounding land uses, as set forth in the Land Development Code."
Comprehensive Planning leaves this determination to Zoning and Land Development Review staff as part
of their review of the petition in its entirety. However, staff would note that in reviewing the
appropriateness of the requested uses/densities on the subject site, the compatibility analysis might
include a revievv of both the subject proposal and surrounding or nearby properties as to a!!o'v'ved use
intensities and densities, development standards (building heights, setbacks. landscape buffers, etc.).
Agenda Item No. 178
May 26, 2009
building mass, building location and orientation, architectural features, amount and type of o~!Spcicef 159
and location, traffic generation/attraction, etc.
Based upon the above analysis, Comprehensive Planning staff finds the proposed PUD amendment
consistent with the FLUE.
PETITION ON CD PLUS
cc: Randall Cohen, AICP, Director, Comprehensive Planning Department
Susan Murray Istenes, AICP, Director, Department of Zoning and Land Development Review
David Weeks, AICP, Planning Manager, Comprehensive Planning Department
Ray Bellows, Planning Manager, Department of Zoning & Land Development Review
CD/FLUE File
CD PUDA-2008-AR-13792 Naples Botanical Gardens
08
G: ComplConsisteney Reviews\2008
ev/10-6-
2
AFFIDA vir
Agenda item No. 178
fJ1ay 26, 2009
F ,,"C T~ uC 1'59
We, Brian Holley, Executive Director, Naples Botanical Garden, Inc. and Dr. Joe Shepard,
Assistant Treasurer, Florida Gulf Coast University Foundation, Inc. being first duly sworn, depose
and say that we are the owners of the property described herein and which is the subject matter
of the proposed hearing; that all the answers to the questions in this application, including the
disclosure of interest information, all sketches, data, and other supplementary matter attached to
and made a part of this application, are honest and true to the best of our knowledge and belief.
We understand that the information requested on this application must be complete and accurate
and that the content of this form, whether computer generated or County printed shall not be
altered. Public hearings will not be advertised until this application is deemed complete, and all
required information has been submitted.
As property owners we further authorize R. Bruce Anderson of Roetzel & Andress and Margaret
Perry of WilsonMiller, Inc. to act as our representative in any matters regarding this Petition.
9~
Signature of Property Owner
Brian Holley. Executive Director
Naples Botanical Garden, Inc.
Typed or Printed Name of Owner
Dr. Joe Shepard. Assistant Treasurer
Florida Gulf Coast University Foundation, Inc.
Typed or Printed Name of Owner
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ! S day of 62PTEI--\.EJ(3z. .
200~ by :]3\2.IA10 ~Dl.-l.GY who is personally known to me or has produced
i?EJ2I=,D~;:J f::-Uo (;) W as identification.
State of Florida
County of Co u..U;\2..
cJ -f-' ~ 7-- ~-I-:
)~tu2./ _ \(;j; lMYL"
(Signature of Notary Public - State of
Florida)
c.Jct(2{<:>--nG L. Bi2-IG.\+lOI'J
(Print, Type, or Stamp Commissioned
Name of Notary Public)
~/...""{.#:: ~ D 0 4 {) 5(" '70
by." P I i2E: oS ifll '2. (p I '2-DcA
Application For Puhlic I-Iearill[' For PI in Rezone 01/1 8!1l7 rev )/12/08, rev 7/11/08
:!!I......... ...... II.. ..... IU ........ ,. .... ......
: CHRISTIE L. BRIGHTON :
: ~""'", CommS 000438670 :
i !l E"".rell 612llJ2009 ~
: '0 ~ Bonded lhru (llOO)4:l2-4254:
: """"'1 Flonda Notary Assn _, lnc :
=-....11............ ......" ,. .11.... .'1 ",.. ."...A:
Agenda Item No. 178
May 26, 2009
Page 79 of 159
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this /$1# day of S&PT.
200~ by JosepH :7J-1/if-PA-P.D who is personally known to me or has produced
as identification. .
State of Florida
County of I-cE.
cf~ In. rf~
(Signature of Notary Public - State of
Florida)
P,4fP. /C./11l Iv!. PA ? () GtJ
(Print, Type, or Stamp Commissioned
Name of Notary Public)
C.OrJH# 1)[)13.!J211
exf/R~~'; ,p~/'./~
Application For Public Hearing For PUD Rezone () 1/1 R/07. rev 2/12108. rev 7/ll/08
~\\\\\\l!t!IIIIi;;
~~'o.\C\'" M. P.4 jlll/,.;
s: 't-...:<'" ........ u(:? ~
~~':..~\JI\SSION~...~~
;:: 'c:.,<:l yl'<:f:o' .....
.:: ..~ ~~a~ I.1,d ~'. ~
~ :~4..;a %~\-:
:*: .... :*=
- . . ::
~ ~ " #DD 725299 ... ~ ~
~;;.'I'1;.. M'~;::
~ ~ ".~<$~~aedr:,("~<""'" <:)' ~
~ rA.,'public\Jnd~.,';<r.v~
~ (ie. ....... c::r '*
"II; lIe sn:'i't. ~\""
~11"/i """\\\\\
COVENANT OF UNIFIED CONTROL
A.aenda item No. 17B
~ May 26. 2009
Page 80 of 159
The undersigned do hereby swear or affinn that we are the fee simple titleholders and owners of record of property
commonly known as Naples Botanical Garden
4820 Bavshore Drive. Naples, FL 34112
(Street address and City, State and lip Code)
and legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto.
The property described herein is the subject of an application for community facility planned unit development
(CFPUD) zoning. We hereby designate Brian Holley, Executive Director. Naples Botanical Garden. Inc., and Dr.
Joe Shepard, Assistant Treasurer, Florida Gulf Coast University Foundation, Inc., legal representative thereof, as the
legal representatives of the property and as such, these individuals are authorized to legally bind all owners of the
property in the course of seeking the necessary approvals to develop. This authority includes, but is not limited to,
the hiring and authorization of agents to assist in the preparation of applications, plans, surveys, and studies
necessary to obtain zoning approval on the site. These representatives will remain the only entity to authorize
development activity on the property until such time as a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to
Collier County.
The undersigned recognize the following and will be guided accordingly in the pursuit of
development of the project:
1. The property will be developed and used in confonnity with the approved master plan including all conditions
placed on the development and all commitments agreed to by the applicant in connection with the planned unit
development rezoning.
2. The legal representative identified herein is responsible for compliance with all telms, conditions, safeguards,
and stipulations made at the time of approval of the master plan, even if the property is subsequently sold in
whole or in part, unless and until a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to and recorded by
Collier County.
3. A departure from the provisions of the approved plans or a failure to comply with any requirements, conditions,
or safeguards provided for in the planned unit development process will constitute a violation of the Land
Development Code.
4. All terms and conditions of the planned unit development approval will be incorporated into covenants and
restrictions which run with the land so as to provide notice to subsequent owners that all development activity
within the planned unit development must be consistent with those tenns and conditions.
5. So long as this covenant is in force, Collier County can, upon the discovery of noncompliance with the terms,
safeguards, and conditions of the planned unit development, seek equitable relief as necessary to compel
compliance. The County will not issue permits, certificates, or licenses to occupy or use any part orthe planned
unit development and the County may stop ongoing construction activity until the project is brought into
compliance with all tenns, conditions and safeguards of the planned unit development.
Brian Hollev. Executive Director,
N<ml?s Botanical Garden. Ine,
Printed Name
,! /(1
/1 /~/. .A' #,,,,0""
/1 /.1;/'
: / /",) ..../",
/ Ow'ncr /
Dr. Joe Shepard. Assistant Treasurer
Florida Gulf Coast University Foundation, Inc.
Printed Name
~-0~r~
Application For Public Hearing For PUD Rezone 01/18/07. rev 2!12/08. rev 7/J 1/08
STATE OF FLORIDA)
COUNTY OF C.m.LIGi2-
Agenda Item No. 178
May 26, 2009
Page 81 of 159
Sworn to (or affirmed) and subscribed before me this (~
day of 6e:f'-rGMf>'El~
, 200.6.. by
{)~IAN rmu.e<'
~~~~'< ~O(,Uc-J
who is personally known to me or has produced
as identification.
~~.~
Notary Public
(Name typed, printed or stamped)
c..i+\Z\~--rI(;. l.-. BP-~H-ro0
(Serial Number, if any)
~fvtl{b 1)'~D43B~1o
~)(Pl \ZCS '. (p ( 1-~ 11? ocA
,... ... ... .... ..... .t...... .,... ..............
: CHRISTIE L. BRIGHTON :
: .......'''.... CommII 0D04:Ja670 I
. "'~. '~
: "..'to ExpirM 1IlltI200t
i i IIonded lhnI(800)432-4254i
: 'mil' Ftortda Notary Aun., Inc J
i... I' ... .1. ......... ... ... ........ ....... .1.
STATE OF FLORIDA)
COUNTY OF Le.e
Sworn to (or affirmed) and subscribed before me this Jg tU day of 5i/Pr,
, 200s.. by
J tiS ~fJt.f 7 ftltPA'R{) who is personally known to me or has produced
as identification. J ~ /rJ. J~
Notary Public
(Name typed, printed or stamped)
(l(.(J~~~'~., /!;y( 115bW
C/J 11M JI. DTJ1j.!i 11'1
&" xFI R 13 $: #-/3- / :;..
Application For Public Hearing For PlID Rezone 01/18/07. rev 2/12/08. I'CY 7/1\/08
. \\\\\\lllII IIlflll,
~"''-<~\C\A M. p;lll0.
~ <'l~\ ...... '"1& ~
~'...O\!.~\SSI04:...~~~ .
:if .'.;", CJ ~lia!Y 'S ~'. "t- ~
- . ~ ~ ~~ ..%. ~
~ * : ,-,fli ~ ~.. :
:: . r.,,)w. ::
::: ".'10 :*=
- % . /Inn . -
~ '3 00 LolLI 725299 : ~
~~..~~ B__ _ ,,;:$~
~ --?- -/"';;&.77(fedtt\{\\ 'i-.~...r.,.. .-.~~
~ ..0/, ..;t'b/ic Unde(ill'..~",<J<:.~
'1'. vQI ........ '"" ~
~II</C, STA1\: (,l" ",....
11""", ""1111\'
List identifying Owner & all parties of Corporation
Both Applicants are not-for-profit corporations.
Naples Botanical Garden, Inc., not-for-profit corporation
Directors: Linda White, Richard Benson, Catherine Ware,
Charles Berger, Juliet Sproul and James Lagrippe
Florida Gulf Coast University Foundation, Inc., not-for-profit corporation
Directors: Duane Stranahan, Peter Sulick, Donald Lesch, Stephen McIntosh,
Joseph Catti and Fay Biles
Agenda item No. 17B
May 26, 2009
Page 82 of 159
"
Agenda Item ~~o. 17B
May 26, 2009
Page 83 of 159
.1
;
ttt 2624884 OR: 2667 PG: w10 tn
- Ja 1lZlmI.... at....... II.
f41Zl1J11t It 1J11III_ I. .-a, GIll
_ Z1Il111M
De !II t..
".11 mu.H
--............-..
~~:1..:t " kI:hsI: r.g
lIot ...u- ..,.. ~ - _to. 'DO
-.a.-. no .-
_. E~J '''..-D
--
_"TIN'
_'21~
IIlI:
_1-
1IlI1/II:_Il:llll1llllll
IIl'IIlK 1M
,..-.
Warranty Deed
na hoIelo&Ion,. ....... 17th dqclf
~.... r...ms-_
.......
A:pl:U
, 2000 .uI..
....._.. CoUs._ . _":Florida
".. !!lI>tal:r;ica1 GlIZ'da, In..., . _-po:cnt =rpacat1011
__" 3584 ___ __, aut=- c, lIapl_, IT. SUOB
, ........" ...
.....~... C0111er _Ii Iloricla ,era-
~ ....-......io___...
-------- -...... (f:I.O)----------- ........
... .... .... ... -. __ .. __ .. IooiI ... .. ~ .. ..... ......;, ....... _ ...
-~..............,_..- .....----..----
"""......."'..~... COJ.ll.r _ .. non. ..... .
J.ot. sa, 51, f2 lllDCl Q, IlILJ!LI:I GRO\IE llIID ftO:II: CClIIIIWtt'S LJ'n'I.& _
110. 2, a. ~.ia nat __ t. Page 21. 01: tile PDloUc -.s. or
Ca1.1.1_ Cnnt:y. I'1or.l.da, I.e.. ..... ~ _ _10 5 e-..t of: Lot. 61
.... tlIe ...t 24'0 t_~ OIl! I.lcrto 60 _ Gl..
"'"' ~ .,-., .........,...s DClIr.Ii Hl1: _1:itlla. l:IM IIlaClISaD
~ or u. _. '!bo G:no.bslL". IRHIaftM -... b 4228
CoftIotI Dd_. ...~... I'L :a.UCl!2.
l
, .
_ ezcept tOI:' the ...t ! r_t o.r I.ot R, l!:l lUl4 63,
_.. ..... .....~ lab ........, fit! ... . ... IIll.4. ... .... .w.t tie _ ...... IHrtIW _.. II.., ~ ........
.. WIIIIaIw.::-r'~ -...:=:.. -........ 72"2?-
;y .",- .iO~ COal!
,.$).~__................._"",..,.....h.~....
STATE OF Flot'ida
C01lrITY 01' CDUJ._
".. ......................~ ......... 170 ~.r
~p-~
Apz:il
,2000 .,
...~~..-.,.......~ Flqrida ~1."'r'.
""'.....""-'ollC..S"Ote''t1f1io1da
~ ''7~-'::'''..'~ f _~~. ~l.?:101t
-
~~II:~..._N._fOtlJ~r_Ill........
Agenda Item No. 178
May 26, 2009
Page 84 of 159
:,'-~""'"
,his o.cummf Pn:parcd By IUld RdQm to:
. 'l. ".f:frey Cecil, m..q;.
PC:l;te~, Wright, Mcr~is & Artbur LLP
5801 P..l.i....n Bay Boul""'..rd - Suit. 300
Napl...., FL 34109
Phone: [9411 593-2900
r.rallD Number,
GrOll'" 11 TIN:
Gro.nte. ~2 TIN;
Warranty Deed
This lndenture, Made thi~ 17th day of
Jam$5 P. Lennana
APril
, 2000 A.D..
Bttween
of Iho CoUll!)' or Collier , S"I<> of Florida
The Botanical Garden, Inc., a non-profit corporation
,gr:tnto.., ond
~~~I~ 3564 Exchange Avenue, Suite C, Naples, FL 34108
of Ih. C<>unty of Collier
SI... of Florida
, grAn t~e.
Witnesseth ht Ih. GRANTOR, !'or _nd in .0...ldo"ui"" of d.. ..n, of
------------------------TEN DOLLARS ($10) ----------------------- DOLt-MS,
nnd 0_ sood ...d vola_bl. _''''''tion (0 ORANTOR. In h.nd paid by GRANTEE. the: I1O:cipl ""*",,f I. hereby od:nowl.dsod, bo.
gronrod, buJ.in~ II1Jd ,old Ie tho sold GRANTEr, Nld GRANTEB'll hein: _ors nnd .""'.. r_, lhe follo,,"n, ..",,11"': Innd. "hlOle,
Iylll,g.nd bejllll in rt", CowlIy of Collier s..te of Florida 10w;1:
Lot 60, 61, 62 and 63 r NAPLES GROVE AND TRUCK COMPANY I S LITTLE FARMS
NO.2, as recorded in Plat Book 1, Page 27, oC the Public Records of
Collier County, Florida, less and except ~he East S'feQt of Lot 61
and the West 260 feet of Lots 60 and 61.
The property herein conveyed DOES NOT constitute the HOMESTEAD
property of thQ Grantor. The Grantor's HOMESTEAD address is 4228
Gordon Drive, . Naples , FL 34102.
and except for the east 5 feet of Lot 60, 62 and 63,
lI!1t the ar:mtor d()e$. 'hereby :Ulli' Warrant (he 1/(le to 1:lord lAnd. and will d.efeud the J.AtII~ jlie.h1~t hr:wrul e\lIi.o.~ of aU pr.nofl,l; wll1)I'l1~\ler.
.n Witness Whereof, Ih. ,renlor has here\llllo "" hI.. ho", .nd
,ealed and ddifercd in UT presence'
f? '/:-/J
ad/
. ;
e
ames P. Lennane
P.O. Add"",: ,",2(1 Boys"""OM.', Sulf.!), Norleo. FL ~'1l2
(Seal)
I ' Lf"
'~'TATE OF Florida
~OUNTY OF Collier
17th
d;l~ of
April
,2000
by
- ~ - ~ ~ . ~ ~
r
p
I
:......._.'"1:'-......:,.......:"'..,.,. -~r.. _<....~........l.......... ."~ :-to;.....
Agenda Item No. 17B
May 26, 2009
Page 85 of 159
Graolee S.S. No. 65-0511429
. ....,.
~
Property Appraiser's Parcel
Identif'lCatlon No. 6 I 836720001
This instrUment was prepared
. without opinion of title by
and after recordillg R:tum 10:
Do oil A. Lewis, Esq.
Roetzel &. Andress, A L~gal ProfessiOl1llI Association
Trlanon Cem:re, Third Ploor
850 ParI: Shore Drive
Naple$. Florida 34103
(941) 649-5200
(SollCe above tbi. line l"onecordlno data)
''"''ARRANTI' DEED
. nus WARRA.NTY DEED, mlldethe {.!/: clay of rr7RQeh ,2001, by .JBmesP. L"nnane, a
married 1lIllll, whose post omc:e address is 200 Patriot Way. Naples, FL 3<tlO4 (singularly Dr eoDectively "Grantor"), to The
Botank:aI GlITden, Inc.,. a Florida Dllt-(or.pront CW')loratlon, whose post office addresf Is 4820 Bayshore Drive, Suite D,
Naple$, PL 34112 (singularly or col1ecllvely .Or~tee"):
(Wherever used herem, the ImllS 'GranlOr" and "Grantee" include III partia 10 this metroment and the heirs. legal
repreaenratives a.nd Usillll8 of mdlvidullll, and !he successors and assigDa of corpomtlons)
WITNBSSBTH: Thatlhe Grantor. for and in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars ($10:00) and other valuable
eonsideratiOO3. receipt of whlcb. is berelly acknowledged, Itereby grants. bargains. sells. aHcos. remises, releases. conveys and
couflrnlB unto the Grantee, aU thai certain land situated in CoIliCl County, Florida. vlx.:
The East 100 feet ofw West 260 feet ofLolS 60 and 61. Jess the SOUlItS34 feellhereof. NAPLES GROVES
AND TRUCK COMPANY'S LlTrLB FARMS NO.2, accordlng to !be plat tbereor, recordell In Plat Book
I, Page 27-T, of !be Public Recordi of eo Iller County. Florida.
TOOrntER with all the \l:nements. hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or In anywise appertaining.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, !be same in fee simple forever.
Neither GrllllOr nor his Immedilllc family rC$kIe on the subject property wblch Is t vacant lot. Ilia not the homestead
property nor doetl it adjoin lhe homes1ead of Ihe Granlor. 'The Grmtor presently resides at the address stated above.
AND. the Orantor hereby covenants witl! said Grantee thst the Gran/or is lawfully seized of said land In fee simple;
. that the Gramor has good right and lawful authority 10 8ell and cOIlvey said land: rl1al the Grantor hereby futly warrants the title
10 said land and will defend the 8ame againsl the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever; and that said land ill free of all
encumbl'lUlces, except lllltes for tlte current lnd subsequent years. zoning 8J1d use restrictions imposed by governmental
. authority, restrictiOl1f and easements common 10 the mbdlvislon, and olllstarnling oil, gas and mineral Interests of record, If
any.
IN WITNESS WHEREOP, Graotor hll6 signed and sealed these pCClK:nts the day and year first abovc WritlCll.
STATE OF FLORIDA
)
) st:
)
COUNTY OF COLLIER
( (:- :r!}1 I
TIle foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me tIus , .~. K
James P. Lennane, who () is persoll3lly known to me or (~has produced ~;,~. 0~~ 1-'5
L 1 ( v/~e... . .. . as identlfication.
,2001, by
(NOTARY SEAL)
......,- , I (> J. '
~...J .... h LC e,j e.. .0(1 e~'lc6
NOTARY P1JBUC
Notary Name:
(Type or Print)
My Commission Explrcs:
JANET de CARDENAS
IK'I COMIo'SSIllHI!C()~2
ElCI'1RES' ,\JIrIll!, 2IIIl1
'OIldod1lwU HolIty I'tlll!o l>1doOW1lIo"
Grante. 3.3. No. 65-0511429
Grantee 3.S. No.
Agenda Item No. 17B
May 26, 2009
*** 2746718 OR: 2773 PG: 307~~~6 of 159
RlCORD!P in OmCrAt !BCORDS ot COLLlIR COl1HT!, FL
o2/06/2D~1 at 08:l9AH DYIGII1I. BRoel, mar
CORS IfZ12UO
HIC 111 Lot
DOC-. TO 719.60
Retn:
Ronm i AI!JlIBSS
m PAl( SHORI DR m nOOK
,mm n )410)
Property Appraiser's PaIt:el
ldelltification No. 61837520006
Thi.$ wstllllnenl was prepared
. wilbout opiniQn oftitle by
alld after recording return 1&:
Doug A. Lewis. Esq,
Roetzel & Andress, A Legal Professional Association
Trianon Centre, Third Floor
850 Park Shore Drive
Naples, Florida 34W3
(941) 649 -6200
(Soace above this line frq recording dlII!lI;}
WARRANTY DEED
q/>t ~
THIS WARRANTYDEEl>, madcthe '. dayof ~ '[L.("i5'fiM , 2ool,byLabanB.LeBall"
and Im"llene LeBulr, husband and wife, whDlle post office address is 6024 Bayshore ve, Naples, FL 34112 (singularly or
collectively "Orantor"), 10 The Botanical Garden. lilt., a Florida Dot-for-prolll c:orperatlon, whose post office address is
4820 Baysbote Drive, Suite D, Naples, FL 34112 (singularly or collectively "Gnuitee"):
(Wherever used herein. the temlS "Grantor" 8ud "Grantee" include all pa.rties to this iJl~tI\lme:nt a.nd the heits, legal
repmsentatives and a&llgus'of irIdividuBI.s, and the 8Uccesso~ and assigns of corporations)
WT1NESSETH: That the Gl'llntor, fOf and in con.idetlltion of tbe sam ofTen Dollars ($10.00) and o1ber valuable
considentions. receipt of which is hereby aclcnowledged. hereby gnnts. bargains, sells, aliens, rerniaes, releases, conveys and
confilll1S unto !be Grantee, a\l lbat certain 18l1d situated in Conier County, Florida, viz:
The West l>S oCtile North !-S of Lot 64, Naples Grove and Truck Company Little Falms. No.2, according to
tbe plat thereoC, recorded in Plat Book I, Page 27, ofthe Public Records ofColJier County, Florida. subject
10 restrictions, reservations and covenanlS of record.
TOGETHER with all the tenement;, hereditaments and appurtelWlces thcreto belonging or jll anywise appertaining.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD. the same io ree simple forever.
AND, lne Gl'lmttlr hereby CO\"~"20\S witb.s'Olid GI11.'lt::c that !he Granto! is laWf'ull" sei;;ed of said lalld in fee simple;
that thc GrAntor has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey Baid land; that Ibe Gtantor hereby fully warrants the
title to said land and '11m defCl!d the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever; and that said land is free of
all encumbrances, except taxes for the current and subsequent yea~~ zoning and use restrictions imposed by governmental
authority, restrictions and elIsemenl3 common to !he sllbdivision, Bud outstanding oil, gas and mineral interests of record, if
any.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has signed and sealed lliesc presents the day and year flJ'St .bove written.
L~~f3. .17/~
L.b.llf B LeBuf! ) .
,>.;J?1%-~,J<.~ ~ ~ iLa::$
Imogene Le2uff '
STATE OF FLORIDA )
) ss:
COUNTY or COLLIER )
. . . 3(St: '-J-~~ l''1 rll
The foregomgJnslmment w", acknowledged before me tlus _ day of" a Itl.. ,
If~~.B. !-e1?u!fand !:nogcne Le~uff, who () are personally known to me QrM bave produced.fJIrr1d 8
'1:-:;1 11i~ r5kl I c'r. nSe> _ as lden!lficallon.
,2001, by
(NOTARY SEAL)
-----
-J BIUJ.. d <-
NOT ARY PUBUC
Notary Narne:
'"' ,
Lar(/.(?nB~
(Type or Print)
My Commiasion Expjms:
JmeT de CARDENAS
MY COMIoll561ON , CG 6394.5?
WIlleS, Bp,1l 16, \'001
a_1MIIl.1llIy MlIo Uodo""''''''
~ ffi cr'l
/,-OL(;
~.-O~
N_
_ 0
-~/'-
C>,ex::.
(Gro(J)
::= 2 i?
ro CL
"0
C
(J)
OJ
<{
Gnnt.ee S.S. No. SC51]429
~~'Ihrcd
~~ No. 61837560008
11IiI iIIIb:umem wu ~
widDlt apiDkm of TJdt by
md atcr I'lI!ICOa:ti:lI retm2l1O:
Sicpbecl E. ~ &quim
Raesze1 A ~ A Lepl Pro1i:ssioaal ACIOdaticIu
ISO Pet: Sbcn Dnvo. 'I'hhd Ploor
N.IpIm. Fkx:ida 541001
(94J) 649-QOO
ttt 2624138 OR: ~o66 PG: 1300 t~*
!JCDilIIII 111 OllIC!.U IICQW Of caum l:OlIlllt, n
04/2Jf2~01J It t:~26l'1ll1tGn l. 1I1Il:t, CUU
~s mm.GJ
DC m [.04
DOe-.n IUU'
Ubt:
!limn i lBUSS
15G fm ~ Pi JIB II.llOI
mr.n n 3U03 .'ISn
~ ~ thb fm..mr IIlenrlHnIo Ibm,
W4RR.lN"l'V' .....
'I1DS WAb.A.NTY DEED. --- ~ o! Ap:n. :zooo. by P..a w. BanIwIdt. ........
-.d ..... F. Tt.l~ a ....., _. 1l'baIe J.lOIt olBce ~ fa S340 W. WiDdIor It.VCIIa. Apt..3L,
CIIIclIIo. IL <<lOO ~ 01' colIecziveIy -Orauriar"). tG n. --~ c.ra.., __, . JiPlarida
".I.r~...a~ wllaeJlC*otne.addnscll3S84 F....~ A___.SalICC.~, F'Iorid& 34104
(daIaIa1)' Of ClllIIecdYefy '<:in1:aeW):
~ IUCCf ~ - -- wGarrIIor' -' -Otal:llleew iIId1tde all paic:a 10 dIU Imu_ aad Ulc bt:!r.I.
hpl n.pi .Ii.... aad UIIIps OJ(~ aDd.... ~ laid ~ ot~)
WttNIiSSETH: 'IlIItChc~. firm!! Ill.~ ofmeSllmaf'T_~(S10.00)"" otbec'
-w.&e~ RCeipt ot'Wbfr::lail1lereby ~ bI=b;y ~ ~ acUs. oIIica$. ~
~ aom>eylIlIKt -=- '-'Iber Onmee. aD dIlIt cenalR Lmd ~ .lA CoIIIw ~. .fIIoridA. vb::
S 1/2 Lot 64 IDd N 1/2 Lac 65. NIpIes GrovflS:Illd 1'nIc.\: Company', lJt!fc F'erms No. 2-
IICCOl'dina lii:l die plat 1bcmoC, IS !IIi:orrlr=:[ In "'- Book I, at Pate 'rJ. of tba fabric ~ cf
Collier COumy. PloriclI. .
TOCmTH:E:1t wtdJ all die -ms. 1~'p.rU....~ aIIlC1 ~ ~ helO11,1iD;c or: in IIIl)"Wi:rc
~~
TO HAVEl AND TO HOLl). die __ ill tl!e llirnpa. f'~.
AND. die 0I:aaar 1>enlt7~..m& IIlld 0Ilace that tile GI:aaxr Is ~ -..a.ote:aicl./.-i as
!.be tizIptc; d-. ... ar....- .. I/OCld. rIIbC llrld IawiltI ~ II) lIllI1 ad. -'"'1 Illid laid; ... die GaaIar
...." fbQy ~ ... ddI: to ..." 1ad ad ril cSetead 121II _ lip&. IbIt JawId d.tIiaII of aD JlIQCIIl$
.... w 1 .-; laid 'dIrIIC IUd :i.Im:f la fme of IIll ~llUlllL__ CIlICqll UseI SW .. c:mrcat ad ..~ ~
...... -S .. ~~ ~ by &lIYOfI>t''''1ltd mIbority. ~lo..do..... IIIDd ~- -"I~ COIDIDClQ so 1llo
~ ad ~ aiL..,...wad IUbn1 ~ ot~ it.uy.
IN WJ:I'.NE!S$ wm!REoP. 0r:aar0T lias ~ &%ld aetIt:cl u-e ~ dle.,. .wad ,.... fit'a above
wzIal:Q. .
~~..
:::::~~~
!:rA'm OJ: IU.Jl'<<Xs )
)u:
COUNTYoFC~k ) .
T1fe "--6. .IIlA._ -1ICbo~ botbco _1Idt /:.2rN 4a)' ot April.:zooo.1ly PIal W.
~ 'II1MI ( ) II; per...ay Jc:Jmw 10 ... 01' 4tS .. '" ll.
. ~.LAIIL~
~~~~
~~~A!
F. TcaaIZIllt
(SEA.L)
aJ8A.I.)
(-, \ ='3
Agenda Item No. 17B
May 26, 2009
Page 88 of 159
\.
Pn:pamd f& zmd mum tl):
2627206 OR: .2668PG: tl32
UCOJIlIItl umcm IDIII ef c:owu CGIIft. ftC.
f4!21Izt" It fI:54f111t'IGft I. .lIaCIt ~
eaa Z?5IfMt
III: . IUt
1lC..71 2l2i.~
{J .~
...
~ .. SdIIdt. P Jl..
SeIiIe c. 110$ 0Ipc Ceral .......1
Cape~~ 339M
....1.$.tD-1097
Fde~: (IO.UlM
'5\0"111 ~a:l ~o :
lite ~
amm i JIDIIIf
m fIB _ H 3D !iIll1I
IUW B :JIll!
0r.lIw:I! 5.S. No. 6..~nm
ParccI fd::ntif'JC::I!ion No. orIOl1l\611:t76OOt"'7 cI: (1OO(l()t;1Jl':li64(J(1l1!l
1~.~n.o.l_,...Jt~~
Warranty Deed
II;T.\11 -nlll\'I'IlI!\l.lOJ.l'TlO' <.11') u:"1 !>,
ibis l..deltlUn made Ihi$. :lhc day or April.z_ bChn:m 8~ Dnt.Iapt:amt COIpM..tA.. f10ridz
~ ~Ihorc J.U' office addr= is s.ite 7. UIa~ Weods Dml:. Fori M,en. Roridl.1J!lt!' or
lbc Couaty of Lt:c. 5Udc; or Florida. ,~. a'IlI:l TIte ~ ..~ c.nsas. hIc.. . Florida 1ICJ[-fot\oprDf"It
CIIC]lO.~ v.ilo5:,post ofT'r::: add=z is !SU t~ A'I'1:MC.s.ite C. J.lICU oftbe: COUJlI)' of Collier. Stale:
fA A.orida.. gnI____
Wimesseth that said l\PInllJl'. 1'01' ;me! in <X>D:Sidcr:alioa of [he sum ofTEN AND NO/)()O DOlLARS lSltl.fJO)
and otJ1cr gOOCl alMI ,,-aI~ ~ions '0 said p;mt<< it! ha.:l paid ":l' said grantee. In; ICtT:ipr wbercor is
~ acbtow~ bas ganlCd. barpirI:d. and sokl.o th: said gntntee.. and gramee's heirs and assigns for'C\'Cl'.
the following described land. riluate-. ~ ad bl:in; III Colii;r C~. to-'~it:
The South JI2 ot'Lol liS. and:>1l of'Lol (>G. Napics Gtll'\'C <It Tmck Co's Lilllc t':>rnlS; No.2. p<:T
pbc2 thereof rccorck:cl m Plat 80ak 1. P1::r:e :17. P1>blic: Jlt::corck or Collier C"cn:sat;., Florida
and .he gramor .hereb}' ~'CtIlmlS v.ith gmr.cc. that 1m: Vlntor has good rigfu JlIId bt\ful alIlbolit). &0 sell :alld
~ saki hmd. and ~ ~ lh:: 1i11c to ~ land far 811)" ;IdS or pamor and \ifill dcl'cnd the same ag;ai.1Jsl
&be: bwfut claims. of all JX:ZSDR.o; claiming by. ~ end lDHb't.hco said gr.1Dlor.
.. -c.~~ ...a"~. It1C;..-d f... ~ w pIo;;;l....~ f"""'itc:<.
In Wituen WbeN!Cf'. ~ has hercul'llo Sl:t gmntc>r's: ImJId one! seal fhe cbly mtO ~~r li~ llbD>-e Wl'inCII.
Sipacd. sealal and 4eli\-en:d in OW' pres=::::
Blacld'orcsl !>e\.-clopmclll COrponltion. II Florida
CO!JICmltion
-~ ,. . I'. ,
.- I .l'~: t :/.: { iII;"',;7;:)-:'
'lllEil:;;~
,
~
. ./ -_ )S' ~.7-
t/~~'- - .~
" ' ....
/'" .'
/ '.',>" .. .
{COilj(b~lC ~-#} ..... ~.'
-.. :.~ ~ . .
'.
.....-.. ,.
OouIMTimIIa
I
~
.""
(
L
Aaenda Item No. 17B
~ May 26, 2009
Page 89 of 159
". .
-ttt OR: 2668 PG: 2733 1C't~
~orF.Jorida
CalII~' of'come
'f(t+-
ne rore,pnJ 1n&1J\1mCftt was adeJIowlalced tleIotc: me Ibis;:" d3y or April. 2DOl1 b)' Joc:rr B. Maier. PlIlll:idcnt or
BlcIcttoresl I>ewJr:lpn:nI CorpadoD. a Flodda co.rpoRl1ian. on bcbaU of' lhe corporlltirln. He, j i$ peI'IOMlfy known 10
me or rXJ ha& produc:cd a clrk'l;fs.licalK lIS itbnific:a1ion.
lNolary ScalI
--'
-: .i,Vt: t 1: (~;,
NoCal)' Public-
PrUrtcd NlIm<<
.~\. " .INS.......
:'!~ Q"";.\ ..,~IIlClC_
'\ 1!DIe:.".
':t' .....,....,..............
My ConnmssiOR Expires:
lI'~DN.I 1SIMu,...."J.__,- ~~
. , 1;~~
~r_
Aaenda item No. 17B
~ May 26, 2009
Page 90 of 159
CJ"""<< s..-:. N... 6~ oS 1t42CJ
0-,... S:.S. No.
tit 2611440 OR: 2660 PG: 275~ ttt
IICllJIIU 11 omcm .... tI. C'G1.l.lJl Cl7II'l1, PI.
u/l;fUU 4 L'~2UI DllIll' I. UllC%, CUft
aa lJf5....t
DC III ""
JOe-.n lillJt
~ AJlllRiser'$ Pan:d
JdonlUiwiDC No. 61137680001
lttl:
aamn I uum
1st P1II .. . 3D ntlO1
lUllS '" .mil
Thls iDmu_ __ prcpa~
1I'tthcut llpiDloo of ,,* by
nd.JJll:r JUoam~ lI:lUllI W
Slcphal E. Thomp::.. Esq,
J\.DcrzI:I.to IuI<II=. .-\ l..tpll'lokssioaal Ml<<illi0l2
TXimml Cemrc, ThIrd FIocr
8SO Pmr: Sbcft ~
NapI~ FtOlida 34''13
(1I41} 6>49-6200
(SDaCc.bcmo lJu. H... I"..-.dl.... .....1
TlUJSTEE'S .DEED
'THIS nUSTEE'S OEa> _cld lhe ~ <lay of ;.1 t~., I 2000. by JtleJ:a,41 FIldl.
T_ _ _ ~.LuoI TJWl o4~,dllell 04"","'%7,1"2, ..bo:le _, aItlc....ddocs,. <19'0
Golden Ode PIlm1. Naples. f1. 34ll6, willi filII ~ ud ~lJ' I>elDz plBlllo sat.:! 7_10 prolel:l,
COl:ISC1'Yt. sdL lea<<. ~ tl<' <IlbI:niise lQ ~:aad dio:poc o/.l&o- leal ...... (Jr" ,.... 0( il {.........tl<r
caIlcd die V/'3IIlDr'";, co 11Ie ..1IIal GJrtln, JIl:.. I Jllol1dI 1IOt-ler-prtlfit ewpcII'.tliall. 'IIbClsc posI oIi"lCC
~ is 35.... s..d"8~ ^""_ Soil< Co NopIn.1lorida 34104 (honislotler c:oIlml.."" <2l1collhc -o.a-'~
lWbelC'Icru.edurd'llbe u:nm"Gn$lr" &ad "GrarIIa:"irx:llloutllbl!:]lIIlieA,,, Ibis illSI'l1lJllelIU"""'" loom. lep!
It'~livcs.nd .'!Kips or iDdivJcllrab, and tht -=sarr ad 1Uip$.( corporatignsJ
WITNESSETH: Tlral tl>c OrUltor,lbr _ iD c.....doaoIlo;a g( ILc ""'" o/'Ta Dollarned <lIhu y.o!llabJe
conU.lcr.>!~ n:t:d;>c wbc:.GJ' is ~ ~ beroby pxns, borpiDs. 5clL:, aJlellS. r.~ ..I.......
c::<mY/:YS..d eoa:Iimn \J1Il0 ca.. Cln~ III 0Ilt eenm lo&4 aa... in CoIlic:r c.....,t)'. Flc>ricla, yf:t:
Lot 67. N&JIe< aro....",d Tnock Q,', UI1lo Fanno.1-lt.. 2. KOOJdboslc> .....pb<d.._f.........dctl
;,. J>l>rl '&d ), Page 27. aflhe l'~lic; ~ of Coll~ C_. FloomIa.
TbI$ <<l~ is .abject 10 =1 .R11I. -. rill' ~ <1IITCnI .1Id .~ yaro: ""tricti.... ..,.; <a!Cl'I>ClU
~o......- Ie the suW-rislorr. OlII5Ianding oQ, ps;>>CllZlillCR! im...... ofn:ta'd. If;my.
AND 1he Gr_ bl!reby co....,_ wltlI G__1bl1 "'" Glul... bas soocl ritflllSld laM..! ........ti,y III
...n uod ,*""cy ..id lllld.llhd bmb:r _the ritlt 10 ..id Iond (Of UIy K1> of Gr.aoor ."" wDl ""fcDd rb! """"
og.iDst lhe )awryl cb-ims of <Ill ~ ~tai",lIle l>:r. IlIrousb or ww:les- Us. raid Gtomor.
m WrrnE..t'S WHEREOF, 0.,. aid Cbfttor bas accllled lbe"" 'l"='I>IS CD .he do)' lJld ,..... fm:l .""".
."nnC1:L
SiJPtd. snled aocl ddinTed
;.."""~:
j II :111
/111ft!!
Jtichznl Fasl, TRIl llIlder llat cerIlIift wild T nul
AIJI=lCIll. dat=l.AlJllfIS1 rT. 19B1
{. t-J ,'i. 'j'. {. t. .
~ I. t!1 I., ",-,Id'/~(-'
WiIuess N.mc: i" I ,'l,.,j~ l . /, f) ,.( ,
--I. f' I
.......J ,:mIl ri I ~. ~
W;_No..... .1 .:~ ~..
S'l' An; OF :Flori<b )
)<.:
COUNTY OF CoII~ )
f' f1. I
'The~.. ~ """ ~J.dgJ:dl>of.......liUs ~ day.f I) ~ t .2!lOO,
by lUcliardF_ T....lGcllllClcrtbatcona!!LmdTNfl~dalocl....upsl i7. 1981. wbo ( ) is pe=a!ly
l:llowo '" I'IlI: <<(Xl '.laolw produ=l ..\nnQ,a "''il'' 1_i1.'tit ...lclentl5aillon.
(SEAL}
.~~. (
. I ..,. ( (1 { 1-,1: (
NOTAJ:Y .I'UllUC -
Nowy Name:
O)'pe or P'rlml
My ~ClO. ElipJn:f:
Ii 1";/\
t
I
I;
L
CQmm
r~ 0 l.D
,_. " 0 -r-
~a
(!)~
-Nm
E >- (i)
(i) CO 0)'
==2 co
CO CL
"0
C
(i)
en
<C
.i
nm~PREPAJU5VBY:
a-J_1iawu'lI
~J..'''''''''~ld ~
"'-U-~SlIIk:JO
~'rs..na.:mq
2768767 OR: 219 J; 0916
ie .\l'1mW 1Il:lIII;s of ow.m allin, ll.
lttl It Ia:UIlI'MIC17 I. ilia. !:!.1U
ClIU ,tIffO.1t
_m 11.5.
IOC-.n an."
IU!tOOJIDAND RE:'J"t1ltN TO:
"De.......... c:-a... -.
.. ~ Drh:SIio!I)
~FJMIU
Jl!l )"AJtCS.ID.,.,
1Ill'll'Ea'S'nNo
TRUSTEE DEED
nus 'I"JltJ!:J'Q: OEm is ........ tJoW. fi 01.1)' Cll m.a.tdt ,.:lG\:)( b,f... ~....
~~~="=~ ,..J~~'::...~.~'::'i;::i
CW'JIIIlI1IIIee J.crdaa("", called Grall_ aM whosC addn:sa is ... ........, ~ .- D, ......... I%.
~ ........._ 11oo _ -__ _ ~ _.....,......... _ __ _.....
~ ..., ~ .cb...r,. -- ~ - ~ 1PIIlII ... ....... ... ..... 01 1Glv- ......,
WITN'EsSE1"H=
11U.T lJoc> GI'llIdIIr. ~ sa d.e ~ 1Uttl.........a"'P.acd by 1J.e...............r ___ or die ~ T.-
~.. ""'" m. c:amicIcioII:ia ut ,. _ <Ii Tea .IOCI NO/UlII J:IoIbait ....... 1IlI.... ..... .... ~ ~...
G_ ill haad pald ..,. Cl......CiI, 0Ic: r~ ~ is ~ ~..ba JIl1IIlII:lf.. ~ .......suJd to IIr;
0...."" (he ~ dcoScribe4"-l sinI:oIt; ~.... DcO.s ia c.au.- c.-.:r. ..,.... (0 wit:
Loc ... NAI'U!:s GIlOVES ....t 'I1l.UCk c:o.wPAN'r.S UTn.E FARMS No.. :it, ~ I. ..., ~ _
,a.t ......., - --.w .. ... ..... to .. rtT ,or ., ~ .... III o..arc.- c....,.. .........
I
1'11oe ...r ~ ~ ill Ods ~f .. _ .... c: tIl~--, r.-:.-.. __ Ik ..........,. ~ .r Doe
C--... --.1 ~ b.1Ot u... II-..rlkb....... . _ he. .
~ .. IIIlr.e -- ":rs lIIno. ....111I -.l CW$ D-ft, _ ................ 16, DIll, .. 0IlI'kW: __ ...... I...., .......
-... ...4_.... J_ 23, .". .. c:MIlcW ~ a...t: 13a. ....... 417........ CZI. .......,..... .."'.ha.....a.ue
... CWS ....- reaow.e SopkaL. 29, J", lit 0IIlcW ---.Ie ... DII. ... ~ ........ 1m;. ........... ...
or 11.... ~ ..... CWS S2-I7, r--.r .....,. 1. Iftt. la 0Ind.l ~ ~_ !'131. ~ 17H ~ 1'nc.
......... - ...... ........, ~ 01 Cll>lMorC~, P'IcrWa.
SIJIQEcr'lt)~~1i11I~ kI~:n,~
SUJr.lECr "J'O ~ rcs:lridioas alMf ~ ,4' 1'l:mTc!, if any; ~wcr. om n:f~ rhcn:t.o WlI no!
DpC:I<lrI:~_c.
. ..nd. lIlr tbe Icnemcnl:l, Ix:n::cii......~ :..... .JlPIlI1C'Rl1lla::S I!=.;u",,, ~ or i~ ....~....u..
a~ .
TO '"-VI:: A.I\U) l'OHOlJ) lbc _t:m fee s.!llaipJe f_r.
AHD G__ J.anJw ~ 10 """ wilIo ... 0"..,."" tbr G.r:o.lor .. die dilly ~ 'P"dOcd ...... lIId.iIlg
Tnala: IUIdeT rho: "'~'Tr= ~CIII., aod ia ;rlI1!da8s ~_i:wy ID Idld u. IIlIIIl .. Iho:':ah ad ~
of !he p:tqaeny ~ ladn, the It:1llla, ~ aad JIf~ DfIAe ~ TItlSt. ~nt, ..lid the; ~ of
.. SWc:: 01 l'kJrida Is2ve beeII rou-.r lI:lld ~ wlth ... ..Il """JlCI:U, aDd _ !be~ OIllll4CX' bs. 'k ftlll
- ad ~ to ~e lbi5 <l:ol::d for Ilo:i ..... -.l r............... hc:n:izt ~ IIftIl 1_ ~ laud ;. r...... of ..u
~brb~_lUari ~ ~ !be 1i1&c 10 Sliid bZld for ..., ~ 0{ O....!ItCJr':miI...w dcJ'<*oI tLc same ~ ~ bwfllt
dolira.s oflllll pc.".,.,. ~b:l'. t~... ~ lbe....id G~_
-.
~_.._--_...,--.-
--
'-.... ..... ..-..... .------------
ttt OR: 2796 F
D917 t'tt
I
. IN WI?:'NIE:SS WImJlEoI". <he. ...u 0_.... '= ~c:d aood ~ li>oc PCSC:w tbe day ..Dd 1"= C'q: """"""
WIIIll:I1. !
,
t2.<<...) t:i:~
^"" ~ '""_ i.......
ofib!: IWorit:z "->iIf'Tntll Ulldcr
~..s...:.t0d0lxr 11. '19T.Z
lMIIR:iJ._
'W ilnc:lJ t'nnted ~'J1lal &are
STAT!! Of'FLORIIM
COUNTY OI"DUVAL
rIM: f~ ---._ .... .dc~ Ildarc -=!.his: ("~ day of ~. .,:Icc.( by.....
Scarn-... S- T..... el u.e Mmtb: F=- Tr.d ooakr~..... l~ u. 17f%; kc:pIIr: ... ~
bowa 10 lIIe at' has prodlllttd f'-lon \'I~~ Lt~~ .. ~
~q~~
(1111<:......._>
r ~J.1IIIiIWIo
-.,.t'~~...."
(5""'" ~n.. ~ IIIIY)
(I .-.l.-.
1ft_.Q;n1OG
...;, _1IIlIIa.lIIlZ
. _...-,--
-~
---...----- ----
-
Agenda Item No. 178
May 26, 2009
Page 92 of 159
I
CD (j) O'l 1
r--OL()
--~:
_ 0
-~(")
E >- O'l
(l)CO~
==:2: CO
co 0..
u
r-
iii
OJ
<:{
t
GzaIJ:e s..s. No. li5-OSU0
~ .AJlIPai='s ~1
~Nc.6Iam6lll102
Tlds ___ Wb~
~.,.... oIll6eby
.oa4AJber RMadiDa ~ tII:
$lqlfam!!. ~ Eaq.
~tk.Mllrllrc. A I.epl ~~
Tn- CaIlI:. 'l1IiaI Floor
a5lJ hdr SIIaee .om..
NIpla...FJadd. 341 Cl3
f~l) 649.6200
Iv
2655431 OR: 269, tG: 0280
- 11'ClRICW, .... of OIWD ClIIIIn. &
DIf1l/ma ." 1~:U"" 1. IIIXt, tuI(
eaQ i21U2.Jt
lie In JUt
1<<'.1. tU.U
Itta:
1lIJrm. i.aaass
.,. fJIr IIIlD n 111I PWIt
W1ZS 11. 2&153
I~-~ --., 11II, I. r.... __ ....1
TRtJS'l.'EEts DEED
nus: ~DBI!!I> ....._ ..iil.C. ~ 01 ~ t L IlL . 2Oln. by """"1.--.
~ a-.. -..l..."x-..IIIdI~ ...1IS____c..'1~or ..~J. '--T.--
..........-17.1.... ........................... idOO~ ~ II&1li-., MD 11230. willa rull..-....
-1IDIiIariIy beiDa P*d Ie aid T... III ~ ~ sell. Ieue. CIlCIlDlb:r or ClIb:nrtiR Ie ~ IIDd
........"..... ... -... '""'0' r-t fill II ~...no.t.. ~ .. ,... ........, ~.... ..
ftoHlIa ... '" ... ~ wIaoaf: pba ofIice IlWn:sI is .wo ~ Drive. !luIat D. N'Ipict. Ro.ida
34j~ (loa....... ~Iy CIIled b "tlnaMc"):
~bcIlliQ1he___~ HCI. ~iadoldcaUJb:pu.tia1Dehir. ~_..b:ia.1q;d
'>04'1~.~.... -icm .r 1Ddiwidr..b,..., the _1lIl4 aaips of CGIlJOlatio-l)
~ TIart... GIaaIDr. farad ill ~ ortloe ""'" al'T;:a DIlU_ &IIlI.I~....1uUII",
-- -. ....,... -i.Pt..........,.. ~ ....s..-~1Iacby IDIIt$. ~ KlIs...................--.
~.... ~ - ..... Go-...u... .........luoI__,.,... Con;",.~. Plooridoo. viz:
"J':Ioc>Nadl.liz ofl.oat 6!>, NIIfM:o o.a.. aadTNCI: CD's l.IIIle '- No. 2. ~... Got '*"
........, I-o..l ill fJ8a Bocok t. I'Ioae 27. et.. _11= ........ vi" CoII>er Co.loG;y. FIcriIoo
Nchbcr_ ..-- _'0 IlpDUR .. UO' - _y -....bo:r ........... _ 1\oe f'"'PCrt1 <lclocriI>td ~ ...
....,............. ad dc>oes --'-Iift _itone ~ pq>erI)'.
'ThiI-..q-... is ~ ID "'"''''''' _ fa die __ aad ~ ~ ftlItrietiooos -r ~
- - - suWiviolaa; ~ ei1, ..._ __I ia-.moc:crxd, if..-y.
AND tbI: am.... ~ _II'/rh ~ lbd..... GwtIar..~ ri,IIlMd JawNl ~ '"
xJI &lid -..,. sUlJoaoc!. oacl ~""""'Ille ~ 10 Mid IaDd fGl"'lltI)'_e(~ -' will ~ lIK-;am:
.....lbe bwfiIl. cbi:laIo; of an ~ c:bift~ by. thouoop cr 1IIldn'tbc sai4 ar-c. .
IN WrrNESS WlmIU:oF. ... Did GIuIlat ... ~ ...... ~ .... doe ....7 aRd :r- 6rol ......
w.ritII:n.
~ w.W1lDd deliYa'tG
ia. UIl' pltsI:tIo::
wl~~ :
. ~r~ 't-d.
.:;ol..c../ .
W"- "\ 11-,..1 ~v. ..ff1V
~ ~J.s
ns-
J.1.wn:nTnlsl ~"apsl: 1'1.I!lIl4
STAn m"-l1/ J.. . -.J
~~b. ) s:c
~~OFh.lh. )
"I1le ~ ~ wii~Y4sedbd"oc; me lhi:!fl,;hJ.. ...,~ ~~: . 2000.,
br ~ L.....:... ~~fll' Co-T__llftlle ~ J, r..u,.". d;ucdJ.upat 17, 19$4.
-..bo C ) h~by tc:iiIetir( v.~- pIClduc:ed f4l)ClItlA .11. _C__~ ~
.~ ..' "~--;:;";':-;"'"
r ~'~~~!1r. ~.,f;%~ .~.; " r';
:of.;;!.: ~ 1.~~'.:;~: :..;~ -, .
.It -~ j"'-;n~!.f:~::
~ ''''';."f-.l- ..0
-- -'P_:.:.r,/:.
'..-~~.;..:
(XEAL)
~--
, .
OR~ 26gZ ~: 0281
IN W1TNESS WBSREOF. tile u:i4 ~ Us na:IIIl::d IIat pr=ms "'" lito day.aId ycu r....-o.bo.c
~
Sipea. -Wllllllcl.:livcm!
--- ~
vr_~-~ & ~
w.1+~~d,"~Q~
-
hi c>..~ kuo!/
Milad........ ~ ._ s--.:.o..1'nIsI:c:
......IboJooepill. Lan... TIU$I doIedAIIJJUSl17. 19&4
STATE OF .:...",..,.. I
)cr.
COUNTY Of ","-(on:- }
Tk~~_~Ic4p.d~_Ibis~.yor Jr~ .1IlDO,
~~=:=~=..t~~;~~~~
~ n:::alr"B cr.flf'J::n,..\
(SE.4.L) (T:YJll' ... PriDt)
My (" . I.... tixplR:: I\)~
lleI:IlE U. HIIIllDN
...,fl\Mr...III.... \WI
.... SG:I5aSt
~.--~
~'- ~r...,:llml
I
.....;.
,
. __.-l.L
-
Agenda Item No. 17B
May 26, 2009
Page 94 of '159
:,r
tit OR: 2692 PG: 0282 it.
m WITNESS WJIER.EOF. 1Ioe.aId GcIalIlT bas l'lCCcaIlI:4U-: pma2lSoa the day ucl. ysr fim I~
~
Sipc4, -w...a~
....-P<-=
'Ji' /1' , .' I'
,.",," .-" I '''"7''': ,.. t:' .I. ..
w~~ 'ilt ~'! . ..:-,; .', /-.~.
~~
lJlI01I
JUly __ Co-TJ1J$ll::O
~ Trostdlded.A>opd17.!lll4
Agenda Item No. 17B
May 26, 2009
Page 95 of 159
. ~!'t";{. (r". /. ~ ..
~~f.,~.. '...
~....... f"l"'. i ." I
STA'B OF AiirioIor- )
,..,,1. I' )8:
COUNTYOF~ ".'..)
.....
'no! ___-- ""'*--l.......__ -:...:.........L _ or .." , 2CIOO.
""ZIy~~..sas$dt:asmreo.~urIbl:JoKpbJ.lAuKan-liIIlcd"'..... 17. 19M. who
( )ia~bawII'''M'''(,>Qwilo'-~ ,,' ..'" ,.. . ....., as
.~~ . ,
!':
(~
".
. f.
"t. ; l ~.."\ ...: :.., 0"\ .
NCTAkY PUIlUC .
N-,,)l_: .,. '" \
(T)'pC cr ~
Ny ('-""'- &p;r..s, .'
1: .'
~ .' .
".t.,
'1
t
..-
Agenda Item r'~o. 17B
May 26. 2009
Page 96 of 159
l'ropt>ly ~'J Patttl
~ticMlNc. 61C7lOVOOl
1'his ~_peponld
wiOlaaI ... or titIc ~
ad AI\er!b=n1ir>rballll ro:
So:pIa I!. ~ Esq.
:a-I-,," MoIora. ^ l.lIpl J'wfeaIoaoI ~
TriDou CeDe. 11rird FiG<<
uo !'IIIl: SIooIe nn....
.,..., Fiorilk :UIOJ
1M I) 649-6ZIXJ
268492S Oi: 2717 PG: 3:.
.~ 1UnIClIl..mM<<uum ~ n
ttmm.. .11 11:11"- __ 1.1IIICl, Clii57
c.f tJm.M
'-:'11I n."
I*DIG I....
1Ot-.n m.n
tft&~
II'/Z l JDIUI
15l1Ul .. Jl lID naot.
arus n MID
t5Dft:to.booo: Iblr IiIr fvr rcc~ dml
TRUSTEE''S DEED
noS11tI/$"/llE'S D11Iil>~n.......3.C!I!lytlf ]./,,'l...s.t. .2[!l!),!:y J~I--....
........ "--1lIlIl""" "-.... "'~aIIII.__c..~.r .....~s. L_ Tr_
...... .....1'7. I!IM, -- pall afli;c UIlIaail laOS. "'-'erBllrff. BIfl~ MD 212Jl). widllillJ pont
_8IIdIadcy~JR*d1O alcl'l_tO pl'lllect.~lIl:Ilb....~...~,..-se_
-.-cl'___ ClfCllYpot\of'lt l....tIuca11od Iloc ~").loTlle.....' Ga....llll:...
....... _....,...nt ewptr..... --lIClIt cotr~..... it oCGO BIyshore r>riwe. S..ne D. Haplct.. l"\arida
34104~~ly.llod_ ~.}:
(lVMIt."'0...4........._ "w....". "Or8Ilcl:"iolI:tacleall ~pI&1i"lDsbi'lJlSlnRlll.'7flancllhc 1oein..1q.1
.....Il.uw.._..s..... or~ UlII 1M -=-n lIId -iPIl or CClZpCIlIltiansI
wrTNESSElll: na ~ 0.-, lorud m ~1ioD oflhe II.Im of Te. 00I1ats and .,. nhlot!lle
~.,..r,''Ii fI, -apt wiw:leof;. Imfty IC~ Ioo'"'r I""*- ~ _ih.. .liens. """isoR. ..e-.
.--.-It-a.-...... 0.. o.-e.aD.... _lo.. __ ... ("0111..-C'-,.. ~ "IT-
tlIc 5aaIh 112. on.. ~ NepIa GreIm _ TNCk Co's Utdt f,""" l'l~ 2.lCCOI1IiPi III ~ pDl
__lCCIlIllcd iIll'i1t BIlllI: 1. hie 27, of\IJ: l'IlbIic ltealIfI of CllllitrclIllllI)'. fltIricb, neqJI
tk &Ml ~ rm-...orlilr ~, l*'JlII*$. LESS "NO .EJCCEnm<:j the Wnt 21.S fteI of""
Belt 220 feel ur ~ Jo/1Ilwlt\s dercJibed pIl1!d: llte s.- '112 .r Lot 69, Naples o-"s _
'l'nd ~'J UtIk n.m,. No. 2. u m:anlcd in Plat BoDlI. hie n. ~ k-.d:s or
Cdtier ea..,. FhridI, ~ IiIc Eatt ;!S r. ftltomIf lbr ~ purpoon. 1..1l>e NoIfh .to
feel d1ll: SlIllIlII1.2 e( IIIid !.al69. A.'NO l.E.SS ANIl EXCEPT IIIc Wczt r7Cl red cd !be FAst 660
h.:t rk Ii.e s...w. 112 oriA 69, NIflb c:no- 0Pd TAd:. COI'Ilf'IIl:Y'J Liulr FIU1II5 No. 2. "'
-a../1n,1&I Il.ool; I, "",.17, ...1IIio 11_ o(Collier Counry.l'IoriiSo.
1laitDl~ llIlI_, DOrbolilCYe1lot-:1l~~Drllle~_;11t ~101ll)'~of1be
~
11:io ~;. ~l 1.. raI _ _ Nr lIw: CIImId eM ~ ,..on: ",!Ilri<lions 1M eo......"..
_Io"'~ ~ <Ill, pt..s~ ....-1Ofm:ml If.1\)'.
AND \he Oletor \len!lIy _ wllh Clnalee lila, tho 0.- .. Soocl "~... ond '-ful ...,\oorit)> 10
Mll_ .......ey..o.i IalM, ..a ioctd>r........... tkk: 10.... _ ,. &IlJ' _.,.,. a.._ and..ru "'fcad eM """'"
......* kwtUt =-- a( .d1 ~ ~ 1Jy, ......,.. << VDoIrr tlo> ailt GtuI<<.
IN wrna::ss W1fEJ(COI'......., ar- IIa ~ Ibcae ~.... u.e <Ny IOld ~... flTSl .be...
~
Sipeot, ..w ad ~r..-d.
iG__~
"-i.. ~s. ~~"--
~.
wu- ~ r~7- Lu....cMt
STA7E.IY ~
~~~~
: ~ '"""'-t"lOU oc~wr-lAt llRa~ 6.y of a-1~ f .2000.
h)'~lDcImciaaJIyaod-s--arc..7",*",ar_~J. \..aurt:llT_ 6tAJlfAlIJ1ltR 17. I~,
"""" <.-rlii ~I:J........ ... ...=e,,' )..too.. ~ ( ""
io~ /J J__/.
~~l=~~~
M1~~~j/2~"?f
l:sEAL)
Agenda Item No. 17B
May 26, 2009
Page 97 of 159
, '
OR: 2717 PC: 3301
tN WllNE.SS wmnUlOf.lhe ..id(la_... .~.lCd.......,.".."..l1ft tl>: day"'" ~ 11m >>-c
....n-.
Sipcd. -w_ de~
loo__
/
W~N_,
, . e . L I
I I,M .L ) \ J....,,;.' N
....... '---.I........ly .._.s-- t'c>- T_
llftd:rlhl' lI11C'p111.l.nRn 1'l\15t daznJ A1IpSI17. 19U
I
..
~ -:\.......7 'c<'~
WI_ .: __
STA.7E ctF rAhv)(~ )
, 1 u::
C'OlJl'CTT OF ~;fv-t- I
..:Ja f. A
n.. ~ __ _lIClcIHlllllcllaecll>cf1on..... ... .:::J-. ., ut H\. ,'" 1 r . ZllOQ,
..,. WiclIal La-.~,. mI as Solo._t'..T_.oflloc IGOCph J. "- TlllJldI eel AIlJU1I7. f9llol.
. ( ) k ~11y bIcIwn III ~ IIIf { ). -1IfOIhIo:d P~. ; lJ J..(, IV I. ,Ii.!,- II -'w",.,,-
i<IeMl.......
. ,seAL,
""~~~
~}oI ~~ s t;.,v(l. _
(1yPo -. .
My C"0lItlniaie0I 'ExplIn;
l.~
t'
,';genda item No. 17B
May 26, 2009
Page 98 of 159
~tt OR: 2717 PG: 3302.
IN WTTNI!SS 'WKF.'REOF. Ill< .ald Gnullot luIs ~ ~ rment:: ClII 1ho r1ay..-i )'tilt Ii'" ah.,\'<;
......-.
Siped. -.Jed ad !k1t_6
...-,...,......,.,.
.~II..~.(~ .~~
w;.....w-: K~t~. 40. .....<: I
~'oI_..
"'Dy _...~('..T"'-"
uader~ 1N&ldllll:lSA1lfUSll1.I'134
-~ .'7
. -'f. --..---
~ ;i" ,- ,u.A1~,~,,~.,~-ru
/" ~.
STAn Of-:l'l:J. ,lJlf../;( ,,\
)N:
C'OtJNTY~_,
'tk fort..... __ ..... '"""""ltIIp4 wren _ lIlia ~ ciIly .r
'" JilIy 1--. ~ly JIIlll.. SUc:cioAoIrC... ,....,"" af1loc ~ TtDll
( I it ~ kMWII '" IIIe or I ) ""'" ... pntduc:od
~
.. ,..........,.
~
.'
. JIllI!l.
17. t_. ",1Ia
.,
.::..... ~".I
........-.
. .'
, ~~// I'/~//
~ ~lty PlJ~ ."
NNlyNome, A..., (J ;(hAt
fT)F",1"nlrIl ./
My,CllllltnilSllIIl Expirea: d/ ".) Ij ~()~ v
,. ,........
. .... ...~ .....
.. ~....'I...
I ,( .
:-......
1
I.
. l
Agenda Item No. 17B
May 26, 2009
Page 99 of 159
f
i
......... loop
c...-.....d~ TTc..... 471.
...T....., n.JIIa....
.....rutla
AdII:.t. .......
....:tG3J.5...l
2606814 01: 2651 PG: 2846 .
.... iI amcw, ... tf amm ~. Jl
111lf/21ft It U:M _m I. JIXI. ~
at ztiHII...
DC' III H."
~-.71 mil..
WI:
IrI!m 1_
15I___Jllna
IIRII a JiIll
Warranty Deed
ThiI Wan:aaty Deed made OD Marda 8, 1000, IJf COLLIER DEVELOPMENT
CORPORA nON, . corpor:a6m:a olplriDd and nistiarllllder thot ....... f41br: Sbn ~
I'Ierida, Iurriar ill priDdpal pilla: of f1!qiaeu. at 3OU3 TIi.m..t TrailNGrtb HIO>> Naples,
FJMida 34113, GRANTOR, ta THE BOTANICAL GARDEN, INC.. . FIoridJI D~fIo.
pIWIIt e.rponIiea, Iaa'ri.aC its prir:tcipal place of ~ at is 35B4 E:a:dlallCe A,,,eII1Ieo Saite
C, N~ Florida 34104. GRANTEE.
Gi'aJljor. ia eouidenIfiott or TeD DoJIlan ($18.00) paid b;r gratu,. puats aud
a8"". to p-aIIRc'" .....eeJs auc:ce:asDl"II alld atISIpd fore'Rrl daat ~! propeny located
ill die c~ otCoIIier, Sate or Florida, IUId mctn: puticalariy described .. follcnn
~. "'Pr.perty"):
SEE EXB.uJIT-A" An-ACHED lIERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN BY
. .eWrbtNCE
Subject to .l'C:lII atlte tau tar 2000; ZODiIlJ md use nstrlttiOlu _posed by
.....aaama autllorlty; ratziGtioau aDd ~b celia.OII to the ..iH:IiridOll; alMl
~ 011. au ami mbN:nI hmtrut or ncord,.1t -way aDd the follir'lrin& COTICUIlta ....
awricdoaa w~ shall beCOVQUlta I'1nI1ZiDc with tbe ..... biudiJlc..paD ....aac:ee:uon ...
2r.l[O
I. Vile. UlSe 01 tiae Property shaD be. liadted to- d"'pxnet bd 11M.. . ~~"'
pr4ca, aDd andl1u)' IIlItS diredI;y related to ... ~'zdal pnlm. JJ' dais 1IIIe
ratriedoa iI ~ U4f radtvItJlldorl UDol cund'wjtbht.30'd:aysafter p~.
....J ......
........
~'.. T.IlorlllPn_~
~A'~
A.~lufl U'lIIllMu.eiad. ell'
. &5O;~IDIcn:~",,3tO:
~13;
(
p',genda Item No. 178
May 26, 2009
Page 100 of 159
r
I.
f
OR: 2651 PG: 2847
Gramee ....... .written DOike of die .pecl& ."iolatJoD, Granlor .haII haYe, 10 additiDII
to the ~mcdizs described ia ~pb 5 beta_. the ript to J"epurcJu.u the
Property ud the iJllllro~ tbereoll for the tbal fair market .........~ dctenaiDed
as daerlbed below, lUC!h value .. be no J!U tbaa the amount DwIted ill th~
Property. If IUell ript it ~, GnaDler shaD Ja.Ye tbe Property aDd
=PI"In-u:e:= app."':i:.ed by == :PF:';Iise,. Id=ted by Cnu~:o:r. If Grantee d'"Dp'iita
the ".rue .. ___bled by sudt appniser, Grantee may ave th~ Property Hd
izap,.,._call awailed by aIt .ppnbcr ftled:ed by Gruice. 1f file putic:s AiD
call-. azree - tb~ \'Ale, rhe two apprailen JlJaU joiDtiy sekct . tlriri appnlsu,
wlaose delc:naiDatioa of VJIlae shall CGlltJ"Ol.
2. Bddiaa Hdp1l.. BlIDdiDg beigIAs OJ) the Pnperty .1uIii ~ limited to two (2)
stories qd hi be eveDt 180n! ths:rr 36 feet measured from tht flood ekfttioa to the
bigbat poiat 011 tile lnalldiag, iuchrdiag witItout 1baUatios, lips, CUlfJp~ b&lllllen,
~ ad any otiJao atnIdun wbtsoever.
3.
Suadacrty 'I1drd. TIn: MUCbc:riy ODe thirII or t~ Propa1y(tbe "Southerly hr=I"):
(1I) 1'he bllildlag lei back Hae aleag tht: saathCrl, bo.lllduy of'thc Property.baD
be 50 feet.
(b) . 1'l1) IIJAhIkmma: fadUty 0... fiat ..-1 buildi:ap may be c:QDS1rvcicd ill lhl!!
So.th.erly P.Rd. A2ay lInc:mre: ill the Southerly Pand, other thullJllll:
m~ 01 ~Ct (2) .d.I:lP dory strll2c:tD1!"eS or DQ mare tlllu.!: 2..DOO ~an:
feet each wftIa -.terior ..~,.. e"'~ .dmIIa.. to diaR o.f Cbe
VDitor'1 Cater aad oilier dCftlopllleat OIl the Prapeny fa the aorth. .1aalI
require tJa~ 'WIi:tRJI appronl of'Grntor prior to the arlin- f4' tL~ appUcatioD
for allY pcnatr or the '<<J.~C4'.!DWI. of evadrUdioa thereof: Gnmtol"'s
appnrval "U aot be u.uu_ably withhekl OJ" de-byfll after dbeuuioD
behweaa G....tee aDd Gl"8l!or.. G....io!".1riD prburily be eou~ed with
viIuat 1I0iR, odor, Jicblhag, ud embPous iulSJaCb whicb any lut;h
de..eklplacar in ae Soalllerty f'an:d may have upon Gnmtor"s raIl'~"""'&
property to tiI~ IOIltIL 0lIet: ....-_.fteed '1'l'itb nspeet 1-0 any partkr.tbr area.
uy ~eat ~..dWl H-coatiDued diligently ~ eolltpletiO!L
~::t""5
~
Agenda Item No. 17B
May 26, 2009
Page 101 of 159
'" .
OR: 2651 PG: 2848
4. Southerly A~ GraalOr and the pests,. '1ICCC:ISOIS .... asdps.of GrutCIr ,ltall
be cnmted auess Ie tIte botaakal pnka from G~tor". pnperty to the IOa'fh 011
tlae ..me knDa as ..y pabtic ~ pnwhled Gr.aa~01' Ibs1l PtI1 tile COSf or
ilmaBatid .... JUiJdcB1l>>ee of rile point 01 mtry imp~lIMDb for the at::eeU a.1:HI
dae c:otIb Gf c::DJdro1lillC mdl e"AtJ:Y.
50 ~ecliM. Jf aay or tb.. deed rlCStl'iedou are ,..kUfcd. .met nJdI 'rioIariCllI is Dot
CQnd lrit.biB 30 d~ after pI'OVidJ-c G.r.lIUtee 'Iri6. ..rittea ~ of the apedf"ac
~ Gnutar..1uIU Iulw tllc rigbt to CDforce tIaac dl:Cd n:strieti_ by ad lor
apeciIic pcrf'onIwIce, iajuactive ~ udfor dalDaFl-
I
GRANTOR raerYl!:lI wrtu iW:If Cbe oil, ~ IIIId __nls ~ed 0111, w1t1aia Uld
IIIIIIIer die PJ'OloCrty deRribed h~ wIdch riptl aan: c:prasly .DOt iDduded (lIlI this
eo~ provided lurweverfbllt GRANTOR ..baD iIMIf blrW! _ay rlgbt of eJdIy vpoa the
PloIlip... t;7 to ~ Uid I'eSI:I'ftd ripts..
&del G:R.ANTOR doa hereby fully WSI'J";lmt die Ude to Did 1aDd, aDd 'I'riU dd'CIKi the
-.a! apilllt Js:wfW cbiaa of aJI JRDGU whcnroeem'.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF1 GRANTOR has he"ltWD.to .... GRANTOR'S bod :llId
IIaIIl die d.,. aIId :var flnt abotre writ1ea.
(sipature aDd adm~r;maat amtiDue 0Ja the foJlowma Pie)
~oF.>
~
I
-....
Agenda Item No. 17B
May 26, 2009
Page 102 of 159
~ ... .
\ .
r
OR: 2651 PG: 2849
I'V\~ l. ~'oJ21
\
Pdat N... .~ L. Ball .
~~-tk{~
COlLIER DEVELOPMENT
CoRPORAnON,. FI.ricla an:ponaiae
Pri:Iat Name ~ 'h]~
~/2 .' .
-.. .L ~L~ '>"
.....1.. ,,'" ~.'" ,.. .l :w-.,.
Terry L V"1Ce r'-:"iml ~... '..: l,.;.-
. .. , 1..~. ~:
'. i'.~."" .,"
':" I _... .....
.... .,.
~SmI ,>,'.;>
.' .~ :! C1 .
J
STAn: OF FLORIDA !I
COUNTY OF COLLIER f
The: ~butrameIlt..... ~ W-= JBetJu. 8e.fa day of'
M*-I'dI, 2tOt,. by Terzy 1... FJ6n. .. Vice ~ or COLI..I:ER DEVELOI'MENT
C02PORAT10N,.!1oridR carporadoa, 011 ~of-= eorpol1dio!i. He b peI'IOIdDy
.....tGme.. , -.5~~,,-
~:lWaoI) N~ l'abIic- ~ BaIr.hria
c..___ Nmabea-: CC66Ol7J
Com.... Expfratka Date= Aug. 20, z001
..,Jo"'itL ~ ~'"
y A "Y,~"O:66OII7J
'\~ ~~2D01
IF ~JlQrQHQ<:O~1NC.
;;..
,..."... .c!5
.........
."
---
Agenda Item No. 17B
May 26, 2009
Page 103 of 159
" .
~t* OR: 2651 PG: 2850 ~t
EXHIBIT "A"
n..w...,t>>..r..... ofSc:ctlo. Z3, TGWJllblp!O ScnItb. Rule 25 EMI, Callier COIl1li1.
Florida
('lJIc BoUDicaI Ganicna)
All 'dNIt pari 01 SICtlaD 23, Towullip 58 So. RMge 2S East, Collier eo.DIy, Florida,
1NIaE IlIlOre plll'timlariy ~ed as.~
C_dqatthe DOI'tb ~.conrer 114..w Scdio. ~
..... So" .a'.,-' EMt so.OO feet to the Poiat oIBcgiDuing oftbc pual oiled:
.... dacribId; .
8leaa:~. Satb .42''''7" lAd 2348.72.feet;
a.waee Se1:dIl89'24'lJ5 West 980.26 led;
CbeIIce NariflGCrS'l7" Welt aoo fat;
1heue SoatJa ~'85" West 3GOJJD led;
a... Nor1II er33'1?" W.-t!113..15 feet;
~ N..... 80"28'25" waS 1251.15 feet;
ihIaa: ~erlJ 78.30 fcc:t aIaas the an or. tanptlal~r cu"e eoneave te the
~ ~. r.adJ1II of SOl ,_ tlaraup I eeIItr.d u&le Or..f3'~" au beiDg
.....dcd by a dIo~ wIdch bQnr N.... 4M3'IT'" East 105f fed;
thaec Nor1b .1.('59" E.t J222.17 feet to the FoiDt etflkiiamg 't1l the pared GrlaDd
.... tIesc:ribed; .
iSaldec:t 'tD aaea..a.lIIId ft:Stric:6eas or neord.
C--hi...C 68.S6 lIQU IlIIOft or lea.
.... ~.,."
.........
,Agenda Item No. 17B
May 26, 2009
Page 1{)4 of,t 58--
Strap No.:
3002004 OR: 3058 PG; 2877
RICOlWBD in omCIAL RlClIRDS of ClltLIIR ~amT, F1
D6/20/2Q02 at 08:39A! DiIGBT E. BRaCI, C1lRl
CORS 215m.OO
REC UIl 18.0U
OIDBIIIlG 13.00
DDC~.lO 1505.0D
PREPARED'BY AND.RETURN TO:
THCM...s G. ecKERTY. ESQUIRE
12734 K.nwood Lane, SultrU
Fort ill\yBB, R.. 33907 4i83Il
Reconfing:$
DDCumtlntary Stamps:-$
Retn:
RDETZIL i ANnRJS5
8,~ PARt SHOll DR 3RD E1001
IlAPtiS !L 341113
, 2002, by
THIS WARRANTY DEED made this /.s2 day of Iv; "" '1
.KELL Y ROAD ASSOClA TEa, 8 Florida general partnership,
whose post office address is 142 Johnny Cake Drive. Naples, Florida 34110, hereinafter called the Granter,
to
NAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN INC., a Florida nDt~for~proflt corporation.
whose post office address is 4820 BaYShDre Drive, Sui.t:e D
hereinafter called the Grantee;
. Naples, Flonda 34112. ,
WITNESSETH: That the Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars ($10.0D} and
other valuable considerations, receiptwhereofis hereby acknowledged, hereby grants, bargains, sells, aliens,
remises, releases, conveys and confirms unto the Grantee all that certain land. sltuate in Collier County,
State of F!orida, viz: . ,
(
. All of Lot 95. NAPLES GROVE AND TRUCK COMPANY'S UTTI..E FARMS NO.2,
according to the Jjlat thereaf, as recorded in Plat Book 1. Page 27, of the Public
Records of Cc llier County, Florida '
SUBJECTTO EASEMefIt'TS, RESTRICTIONS AND RESERVATIONS OF RECORD.
THIS PROPERTY IS NOT NOW NOR HAS IT EVER seEN THE HOMESTEAD OF GRANTOR.
TOGETHER with aU the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in
anywise appertaining;
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same In fee simple forever.
AND the Grantor hereby covenants with said Gra ntee that the Grantor is lawfully seized of sald land
is fee simple; that the Grantor has good right and IaVlrful authority to sell and convey said land, and hereby
war.~ts the title to said ~and and Will defend the ~ame against the lawful claims of aU per.>ons whomsoever;
and that said land Is free of all encumbrances.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Grantor has signed and sealed Ih'ese presents the day and year
first above written.
,
,
-
Agenda item No, 17B
May 26, 2009
Page 105 of 159
OR: 3058 PG: 2878
~~'~L
, '
pm~4/~~Dke,
~
Lucill Clancey
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF COLLIER
The
~
foregoing instrument was acknowiedged t:lefcre me this 1.---. day of
, 2002. by Lucille Clancey, Who Is DI!IfSonallv knewn to ~l OR who produced
as identification, and who did/did not take an oath.
NOfa~ Jl .13~
Commission No.:
My cOmmission Expires:
(il' s,hicl18llDka
~ . MVCOMMISllQif a::RQi1 tmlIES
~ ~17.~
~ . - toIlllED_tIClYrM.Il!lOUllCE.1NC.
(
(
/i ~~d
( ;.:'U-n . . -fi(.Lf '
Printed name: (:;;;11 - ~ D/ K;;L-'-f
~I~.
~ :/ ~',
Print name: -- '" ~,..."el'
Agenda Item No. 17B
r,1ay 26, 2009
Pa;]e 106 of 1 59
OR: 3D58 PG: 2879
!:df / I~~Q
t/l - '
Robert Bliven
STATE OF FLOR,IDA
COUNlY OF COLLIER
The foregoing instrumentwas acknoWledged before me this~r day of ~
2002, by Raberf Bliven. who is personally known to me, OR who
as identification, and who eNd/did not take an oath.
.
produced
N~~/J ~
Commission No.:
My Commission Expires:
r~ ltSUf:A. OLNi
l,_ .. My c..mm [xp. 5125.'04
. .,.. P'U8tJC ....
~ . ~N", a;!l3594!
i'
1.. ~- 'lothorU..
(
(
-
(
(
Agenda Item No, 17B
May 26, 2009
Page 107 of 159
OR: 3058 PG: 2880
~
Bra} B. Jain, Trustee for Sanjiv Jain
STATE OF I l-L
COUNTY OF ~~
The fgregoing instrumentwas acknowledged before me this -,/1: '6tday of r-r ~ ,
2002, by Braj B. Jain, Trustee for Sanjiv Jain, who is psrsonally known to me, OR who' produced
as Identification. and who didfdid not take an oath.
NotaryPublic ~ ~
Commission No.:
My Commission Expires:
9 /;r j;. ~'t.')
,,' I
p"n~~~~
. d OR: 3058 PG: 2881
~;kRsmpn~
"... ~ 6~
p~ SyJvi~ J!:;o&Jke::'("
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUN1Y OF COLLIER
The foregoing instnJmentwas acknowledged beforemethjS~day of ~ It: ~ '
2002, by Mike Stephen, _who is pt!'!rsonally known in m~ OR who pro uced
as identification, and who did/did nat take an oath.
:\f'laY "'Ii 6FRCl;\LHOTMY
0.<:0 'lWll:nJTAYI.Ctl &;iAL
~... ~ ~"lSllOi~
~o of" LlYOJN~~
F F~ ._.9<?7'.1 2004
Notal)' Publi
Commission No_:
My Commission Expires:
('
,
(
Agenda Item No, 17B
May 26, 2009
Page 109 of 159
p~~~
~~ 6Z<r-:-
Printed na : -rt=.1V~' RYAN
OR:305B PG: 2882
~~
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF COLLIER
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this.2..E1L day of A P'R \ l-
2002. by A. James Keyser, who Is personally known to me, OR who
FI.OJ!:f'bA, "bR\Vetr 's L.Il:.t~?-l~e. as Identification, and who did/did at take an oath.
.
produced
"B'RA U.l L.LG'TT"e.
\J.PoM Mv ~Tli-" ,'::-;:.1'
,;,B~;:~J.;~::X:::b;,. :~
~r" -/l'"1"f':if!..4~ r;~'f. ~..tt..: t ...
~.' ,..'It,. '., ",t:J:- '. i,'~,*'
.. .. r."r, I ""... . '" ,~~. #f!<O.
.;. .l . .~!;P'_'~ ~- I~..", "'../,t. "........;,
.I, ~.. , I ~". -
r.'~~' . '1.../-)..'...,"'......\0- "
u.;: ",..' ','. IA"', .:..'(''::'~ ~ '
#; . }1T;' . ,,~, ..,,:,.,r,.. \,.r:.. ,
: ,; .'f'. :' ;, ,;;;->'~,;,. !' .J..': ,-:I, .:; . - :
. _.....~ ...'.)V' e '\t!" ..~.. .-,
1, . ';{' :!",.. " :/, / ~.'~ ":::)':!j.;'J;,:':'" /.
, ,.' . .".IV/'-J . ,"'_1....".,.., '
, ~,. , '.'F JI . 'il,.,;'. .' '. '
.f:" ~,1>''''' "./0J;"rJ';',' :'."
! . ~;.7"",: /::'", ~'; ~T."l.~."~ ;..~ I' ..:""
.t.',"""":: ';,;........" /')i
~'1 ~I"." .~;~;*,J (:;~:~y~:~.\, ,....C:~
. " ." tt ~,.r!...",' ,':pc,
~~...!~t'lt~i;t. .-:.~.:
'f,'fi(C !p:'".{~:' j/
't,' ~ .
(
Agenda 11em ~'Jo, 178
fv1ay 26, 2009
Page 11 C of 159
~. f
. 1l....1L~.
Printe name: ~Ut;" -'U ,..It::,.
~~~H~
STATE OF FLOR1D,c.,
COUNTY OF COLLIER
The foregoing instrumentwas acknowledged berore me this 2."fJh day of MIJrvi.
200..2:n by rJim Merpohl. who is personally known to me, OR who
~na.Jlv /-<!tlown ;as identification. and who did/did not take an oath.
,
.
produced
Q/IZlId. MfrV
Notary Public
Commlssion No,: {!C 82'78'55
My Commission Expites: April /q/ :l/)tJ3
<~ DIane L Hallon
*.:*My ~ CC!!27655
'=..:;V ~~ '11. m:l3
(
Agenda Item No, 17B
May 26. 2009
OR 3 05 P~e 111 of 159
: 8 Pu: 2884
~~~
Co ,...J tl r\ L. B P 1;1 k.a.t'
Prifl~ ~~,~O~ kor
. ~..~
Robert eym
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF COLLlER
, Theforegolng instnJmentwaucknowledged beforemeth~ Z 7 dayof..1}1a.rU1
2002, by Robert Heym, who is personally known to me, OR who
P L [)L as identification, and who did/did not take an oath.
,
produced
.:i~",
, ,~.*;:'~ ,1
~ .... \""1'" JUtu.."
., to:''' D~ '.,
t ." ,:-", ,,<\1Co.... C f ,'. ':-
: :J'" ,:-............. i "fI~.~..:~" -.",;:'IT .
,. '~ '.~ --.l "" c. .
7/"'M.J I 'Z.~, .'}: ~~\.'''l\--:'
. "!,:: -- ,.~. () '. '~.
I':, no." C>"
1 ,- -<< ..... ". tI'.,., <<
t r :; '=' :. :-:;;".~() " ~l : I
t,.::-.....!fl "o::o.~
f L '"' '" j .~ 'I~ r','-J .' '"
.. 2 ~; i\ .....~ t"t .~ .~~.". ...../
f' '.E. ~t....,....... '\ .
J-t/. tJ",,;: f,.\ 'it:. ~,,;.,:,
,~ ,. h-t JtJ'..u.n.1'''~'''J:''..l.
~ . 4i~'r, o:.-..!fl' -.
\i; ,~. .
~ ~t:.t"
(
(
,- /L/J,lj /
The foregoing Instrument was acknowledged before me this ~ day of /Yl"" >
2002, J>y Dr, Herman Goldberg. who is personally known to me, OR who produced
mO P^- as "."';fica"on, and....o aJd;?2::;::~ '!L4L--
Nola". "'b'" ff
Comm!SSlOO No.:
My Commission Expires; . ~I ~ /O-?--
~' (l~iA- .
Printed name: I-Z:Ju I!. E.,D/l.l1=C"U7
Printed~' iff;.., .-1
u
STATE OF
COUNTY OF
r/4- "
0'/// E'/2.
~~ IolERlUeullZALoNE
ti i:t MY COMMlSSfClff , CO 7:f.l383
- ~ EXPIRES'MaY""
"'o\\'..Ili .. 1lutJl.~T1w~~U::~..
(
(
Agenda Item f-.Jo, 17B
May 26, 2009
Page 112 of 159
OR: 3058 PG: 2BBS
/1 t
Agenda Item No. 17B
May 26, 2009
Page 113 of 159
3058 PG: 2886
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF COLLIER
The foregoing instrumentwas acknowledged before meth~ day Df~
2002. by Teny Haft'. who Is personallv knmatn tru:ne, OR who produced as
lden_n....."" dldl... nnt lake an nelh. ~ 71rt/,_~
otary Pu Ie
Ccrnrnisslon No.:
My Commission Expires:
(
(
I
;: J\. """1It IOIIIIBr
- ?JI..i Illy CarmiIIIr&llJi!.lClB37'Q
~..;; ~""""111._
...
~~~Q.
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF COLLIER
Agenda Item No, 17B
f\;1ay 26, 2.0Q;L
Page 114 of 159
c~ r,- OR: 3058 PG: 2-887
'/i~ \-L a---
Dan Dunnigan
_ ...... r
The foregoing instrumentwasacknowledged before meti1is ~day of rn ~
2002. by Dan Dunnigan, who is "personallv knc.wn to me, OR who produced
as identification, and who did/did not take an oath.
ROBIN GOOD
Notary Public. Slate of Florida
My ccmm. up. May 28,2003
Comm. No. CC823084
"
~~
Notal)' Public
Commission No.: ~L E Z- 3 0 kL./
My Commission Expires: .5 - ~ ,. - e> ~
(
(
~Q~
~ 0,:- :,H:
Printed name: . _ . ,.. . ...
~lai.?t' A. ~.e,4~
~~;~ E t>~Tb~'
Agenda Item No, 17B
May 26, 2009
Page 115 of 159
OR: 3058 PG: 2888
U~~..~~h
Wlfli;:ml Graham
--
STATE OF '-Plo rO. iJ,p..
COUN1Y OF Co \ \ ~ Cl!....
The foregoing instrumentwas acl<nowledged before me this~ day.of M~ ,
2002., by William Graham. who is oersonallv known to me, OR who produced
as identification, and who did/did not take an oath.
~ (l B~
Nota ubllc V
Commission No.:
My Commission Expires:
~~ Sylvia 3- 8CIllbIr
... ,... MYCDMMlSSDlt, c::D'3691 a:PIiB
, ;. May 17, 2004
IONIIiO 1IilIlI1IICIl' fMI MJlWC(, Ie.
Agenda Item No, 17B
May 26, 2009
Page 116 of 159
3058 PG: 2889
OR:
~(J)~
Printed na~~1 ~~t:.
{"k~ t \C.v.-v....L
Rosemary am mar
~,;z2: ~~
Printed me: ;, I '.Q, cr: & c> ICe,:.,
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF COLUER
i'f/h ~
The foregoing instrumentwa.. acknowledged before me this -'-- day of ,
by Rosemary Hammar, who is personally known to me, OR who produced
N / A-- as identlficaUon, and who did/did not take an oath.
/
~~~
P~'
NO~liC
Co Ion No.:
My CommIssion Expires:
2002,
,.
~
,:~
Printed rt.;me: " A )/ 17 I ~ A. ,.rwI
Agenda Item No, 17B
May 26, 2009
OR: 305.8 Pri:e 289~ 159
~,~ J-~
Sudha Jain
~'S.. ~ .J~ '
Printed name: ~lU ~ \L:.. a{I.\-N
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF COLLIER
The foregoillglnstrumentwas acknowledged before me th~ day of ~
2002, by Sudha Jain, who I~ pF-H'!llonBllv known to me, OR who produced as
identification, and who did/did not lake an oath. .
~-flI3~
Commission No.:
My Commission Expires:
(
(
item No, 17B
rvlaj' 26, 2009
OR~ 3058 rrrr?EZ89ff 159
~
ChOt S me -'-to
F' . ted name:
~ :; "'" \cz;
prin~~ ~yf~oo~~~
STATE OF FLORIDA 4/'.1. ~,~. J
COUNTY OF-OOLL-fER -.TLQ~
The foregoing lnstrumentwas acknowiedged lQre.TfIe,thi~~, r day of 7n. tV"I... c..A .
2002, by Chet Surmaczewicz., who is arsonal! known - "l:o---rrTe- OR who produced
as identification, an 0 did/did not take an oath.
~/Lo" '/~
Notary PUbhc
CommIssIon No,:
My Commission Expires:
~ JUNE T. LEMIS
MY COM~ISSION #' 00049962
EXPlflEs: ~r 2, l2OD5
I~NtT FL__l<.~I""
(
(
C1t.,~~~
P"~~~~ '4.T--r
~44~
Pnnted ame: "I v : ',-.:r; /1 D T> k~ of
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF COLLIER
Agenda Item No, 178
May 26, 2009
Page 119 of 159
OR: 3058 PG: 2B92
t1~iC!l~
Morris Glatt -
A jJ~-, -
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged beforemethis ~ day of M~
2002, by Morris Glatt, who is DersoQall'l known to me. OR who produced as
idenllfication, and Who'didJdld not - an oath, ' ~dr- ~
Notary Public
Commission No.:
My Commission Expires: # T.ny..-y I.iC>PK
*' * Wl'CDm_........,.jf1l3 .
''''~ f>I!lI""".hI....2'", 2004
(
/
"t''I\ "'j{
Agenda Item No. 17B
fv'lay 26,2009
OR: 3058 ,~g~2~9':rit~
z::;<
Printed name:
"
~~ =
~,~
Dudley Goodlette
~
--
:)/ J>>",(-/A-~
Printed name: -::Lec. '. . Pa,An..n
2002,
olary Public
Commisslon No.:
My Commission Expires:
;"; ~ Vor:Id 40n GItllhur
*~ "* My CDImliMkln CCBD:lD4e
......~ e.pr. Jllf'IIa'y 1B, 2DO~
(
COOJm
f'- C) l.")
.",<"-~- O-or--
N-.-
_ 0
-~~
~ N
t:: >.~
OJro
::::2 ~
ro ro
D n..
t::
OJ
OJ
<(
o
~
z
w
c
tt:
c(
(' '\
,.J
~
;5
o
!Xl
(I)
UJ
-'
a.
c( E
z a.
!l
o
-'
c c c ~o
~ g "iii. "iii. B . Gl ~ ~ ~o m , ~g ~g ~g Bd ~d Bd
o 0 ,~ g 1:1 .~ g
.- c - g lil Gl ~~ Cll CI) -- c - c .- c c.5i t: t:
c_ c_ c_ c _ c_ c_ c_ c- c_ c_ c_ Cll_
~ffi 'sc .!!l c .mc ::~ (!).r;:. J!le:: .Bc ~lii J9c Be: oS c J!le:: ~5i 15 c
-I-
o Gl o Gl o cu .~ g B v .~ g o QJ o III o III Oll) ocu o cu IX! 1II
1m 'E! mE lXl"t:l tD'E! coE co'E! m'E! m-e CDE alE m-e mE (Il"E!
... -c;; .l!l GI
cu tV III tIl III C'G !C'G c- c- j- cu C'G .!tV III ltl Gl C'G .!C'G .!(1l III C'G CI) GI
{5.<!J ~C> ~C> S ~ ~(!) ~" {:.C!> ~(9 ~(!) 0.C)
I-C!> 0 0 I-<!J 1-(9 1-(9 III
IX! IX! U) Z
;: = 0:: ~
"'It 0 ....
19 ~ Z
~ .5 iii
U) u
~l j I E
'Cl E
3/ 0
iii Q
~ u Ui
'Cl ..
aI aI
C + Q. 0
lG ml :: II)
4::= ml :/ ~I CI)
Lt') .! '0
UJ ~I $1 It! !
(/) .9 = <!: .9 .9
lJl II) C'l
3 ... Il) 10 - ... .... N
0 0 ~I 0 0 (!)
::! ;:: w w ;;:: ~ ~ W 0-
0 0) III .... .... U II:! ~
0 ~ ;::: co I/) 0 z z <( II:! f,C)
10 .!! .2 CD .!! <0
<0 It) C'\I .... + + 1.0 C'/
3: 3: w ~ ~1 3: 0 ~I ~I ; ~, ml ~UJ
~ U
00- III .... <( -1- o.
(/) 0 .m 0 .... 0- .s~
11/ ;::: Z 0 -,0
.!!! = .... ..- ....CD li~
0 ~ .... .... 0 .... .... .... ~ ~ '0 ou>
~l 0 0 <:I 0 0 0 alOl ~I
CI) 0 ~ NW
M t:! t:! .... t:! N t:! N '011I
- - - ... ...0
w ... .... w .... .... ".. .... .... .... 0
3: roo
Z fn fn tr.I fn Z (1)- 0.0
tt:i 10- .0 Iri .0 t.ti tti .0 Lt')- ~- ~ t{)- .- (l)W 1(")-
N N I(") l.Oo C .
N N N C'l C'l N C'l N N C'l.... 01 co N
0 0 g 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (;) (;) oM 'EO 0
I(") I(")
Lt') 10 10 10 Lt') 10 1.0 Lt) LO Lt) U'>3: CUO- Ll')
C') C') M ('t) C') C') M M M C') ('t) C') M M (.';)0 C')
N N_ N N N N N N C'\I N N C'\I N N:l N
N.... - -
N N N N N N N N N N N N Nell lIJlt:: N
It) .!lo
0 Ow 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0- CLt') 0
Z Z19 Z Z :z z :z: z z :z z z z z~ ~Cf) Z
LL IJ.. CIl u.. IJ.. u.. l.L. l.L. IJ.. u.. ~ U. l.L. lL l.L.N lL
-I -I CI) -I -I -I -I -I ..J -I ..J -I -I -I.... lDc-ri -I
U 0- () U (j 0_ ~ U ~ ~ U U 0 Ot!) 1OC'l ~
l- I-Oo!l l- t- l- I- 0 l- I- l- t- I-a. 1;\10
+ + =: + + + + e + + + + + + + + oQJ +
lOW
(!) C!)O (!) C!l Cl (!) CD (!) (!) C> (!) (!) C> (!) (.!)co ~5 (!)
z Z~ Z Z z z:5 :z z z :z z z z Z~ Z
<Xl 0 CO') 10 I"- .... M 0;) t- al .... 0 N .... 0 .....
0 0 (;) 0 0 g 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (;) 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 .... 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 g 0
(;) (;) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ 0 0
0 ~ 0 ~. co N N (0 0 V (0 0 (0 N
(0 to i! ;! ...... LO ll) to (0 <0 I"- 0:. ll) C')
to <0 ...... <0 ...... ...... ,.,.. ...... ...... I'- I"- ...... ll) co
M ('t) M ('t) CO') C') M M f") C'? M M ('<) C') en M
0:. <Xl co <Xl <:0 co <Xl CXl CIO co co !Xl I~ <Xl C') CIO
.- .... .... .... ~ .... .... .... ~ ~ .... .... ..- 0 ~
<0 to <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 to co (0 to <0 0 co
i.. 'j! i
e ::i
Cl.
o
z
.2
0:
u..
"-
.7
:::0 J:i ::J)
r-- 0 l{)
~O---
.N~
o .0
Z"'N
,-NN
= >,.~
(j) CO (j)1
=201
CO CO
-0 CL
C
(j)
01
<t
~!ui
c c: 0
::J:~Z
II
-c
~ EI
.c 0
u ..
.... ...
=
Q,
co
N
..,j-
L{)
o
~
<ll
c:
III
c:
c:
<ll
...J
Ql
c:
C\J
c:
c:
al
-1
~ ,_ o~
lIloac::OlC
::lOCD
.:::.sot::!~
~~E~~
Q, c(vr-,f
~
to
en
oi
<ll
C
tlI
C
lij
...J
co
C1l
..,j-
<ll
c:
a:l
c:
c:
(\)
...J
c:
~i ~ cj~ o"ij o~ o~
ell ~.- c.- c .- C'- c: Cll
~1Il c_c::_c::_c_",m
II> .- .= .!l c.!l c.!l c .!l c "" .r:
e==OlUOI1l0QlO<ll'iijl-
o .~ co 'E crl1:? CD ~ CIl1:?~ g
ti:.c(-I <lllll<llC\Jalal<llCll1ji-
.cC).cC).cC).c::C)....
l- l- l- I- ~
(
o
~
Z
IJJ
Q
c::
-<
Cl
-l
0::(
~
Z
c(
t-
O
ca
rn
w
...I
0..
c(
:z
<ll
...
c
E
en
<ll
....
(,)
cr:
&Q
..,.
~
.....
t--
.....
iIi
II)
...
-<
....
C1)
...
c..
In
:3
~I
~I
Li:t
s:
12
..9:!
~
31
-c
c
C\J
~ f5~
~ 31
tn _
.3 0
~ ~
o
o &Q
10 <D
~ ~
....
o
~
III
III
..9:!
~
.n..o tQ-
N N N
o 0 0
l{) <r.I tQ
...., ~ - ....,
~ ('J;;; ~
o Ow 0
22m2
ll. u.. III U.
2 g; ~
+ ~ +
rn 0 rn
Z ~ Z
o
o
o
o
<;j'
<D
<D
....,
co
.-
(0
~I ~
+
(9
2
CO
o
o
o
o
m
co
rn
co
,-
to
==
10
W
CIl
III
~
C')
o
o
o
1""\
~
rf'\
OS
.-
u..
~
&a
W
lI;I
(I)
.!!!
;
-
o
~
....
:z
tD
N
o
10
<"I
N
N
o
Z
u..
...J
o
l-
+
C)
2
l[)
o
o
o
-
.q.
['-.
'"
05
....
(Q
co
(J)
..,j-
IlJ
ai::::-
LPClll U')
~; g N
d
CD
c
:!
c
-3
....0
00
00
'" -
- <0
....'"
MER-
:::
t:
<D
'E
CB~
-I-
.~ g
"'-
III
'5
CO
:::
~
M
I.Q
en
(/)
rn
.!!!
wi
+
~I
~I
-
o
ctl
W
III
III
.!!!
;
....
o
~
....
UJ
-.o-
N
o
LO
(")
('J
N
o
Z
u..
...J
o
:-
:::
o
to
N
~
....
o
=:
o
o
.....
w
tD
N
o
l{)
(0')
'"
N
o
Z
ll.
...J
~-
o
+ ~
Cl ~
2;::
+
C)
Z
I'-
o
o
~
~
co
<<;
1.0
....
ci
III
c::
C\J
c:
C
Ql
...J
~
N
:t:
:::I
CO
al
...J
....00000
ONOOOO
~1'-~02q
:;::N~$D~lO
('t)o~r--Nr--
--"~:;;;r"----('f)
oER-oER-~tA-
c:
Ql
'"C
[ij m
~~
.~ g
c: -
(lJ
'5
CO
o
....
o
....
,s:;
o
.;;
~
ltl
(f)
o
....
(;i
~
~
o
ClI
in
L{}
:ffi
,g
l[)
....
(;i
~
.E
"'"
~
in
o
....
o
....
(;i
:::I
1tI
l.L
~
o
....
to
..-
.0
....
<<l
+
lO
c-.i
to
<l)
a:i
to
('t)
a:i
(0
o
....
- CD
'" .><:
<ll 0
... .-
::l C
j~
-
c
III '
~E '''0
,_ Q" Q" 0:: 0
=a.20~0
(j~O~.g:
<ll
Cl
~ o~ <.i~ o~ o~ o~ (,dLjro u
'c: .5 'c: .5 'c: .s c: .5 'c: .5 '2 .E 'c: .5 .~ .s
Scl!lcSc::l!lc::lllcl!lc:l!lc.sc
o <ll C Q) 0 Q) 0 <ll 0 (l) 0 Ql 0 CD 0 Q)
ID'Em'EID"ElXl"ECD'Em'ECD'ECJ'E
al tI:I III ltl <ll m <ll m W llJ Q) ro al llJ (l) aJ
~~~0~O~c)~~~0~G~~
o
..-
U')
0::
o
.E
u
IA
a;
't:l
(ij
U
...
III
Q"
(/)
en
.J!
;t::,~
~
N
W
In
en
.J!
~.e
ZC
m~
m
E'5'
E ClI
o (I)
()~
Uj C1)
C\l (:;
u ro
<J) <1)
Ql-o
'0 c
oS!!
~w
N~
~~
u., C
ro
tOo..
~2.
OCLU
OF-
cy
-<'>I
(J~
~ g>
"00
~g
O,U)
III
aim
'Co
ffi!l.
(DB
~I
....
C
~
....
Z
....
o
~
~
;:
LO
('J
o
lO
(")
('J
N
o
Z
LL
...J
2
+
C)
Z
~I
...
o
~
.,..
Z
+
~I
-
o
~
....
(/J
LO
N
o
10
(")
N
N
o
Z
LL
...J
(.)
i-
+
C)
;:;::
~I
....
o
~
...
Z
+
~I
....
o
~
....
U)
IO-
N
o
to
("J
N
N
o
Z
IJ..
...J
(.)
i-
+
C)
Z
~
(;
~
c
~
;j
<II
-l
ooC;o8Rg:g
oOooo...Occi
Ol.O~O~I'D~m
~(:)O)(:)(O.......o comil2
l")C'?....O!:::!'rl")oO<"l~ID..-
~ N M '<:t (0 ~ co (0 (;') N- N
-otF.>0~06'70~
f)
~
U)
~l
....
o
N
-
....
en
.0
N
o
l{)
(')
N
N
o
Z
U.
...J
~
+
C>
Z
o
<{
o
....
~
LO-
N
a
lO
(")
N
N
o
Z
l.L
-l
~
+
C)
Z
;= ~l
ol~
...1(0
'0 '0 co
NNW
- --
..... .... 0
:z rn_ ~
~ ~ ~
(:) (:) f?
U') to s:
(") (")
N N III
N N ~
o 0
z Z <0
LL LL~
...J -l.....
~ 0
'''I
r-o:
+ +
C) C9
Z Z
~
co~o
,Q o,l!!,
t:IOO
.s en l5.
o _
llJ r:oi->-
~C':I~
i......, IV ~
olDro
<nen.o
co ... ltl
~ ~ 5~
I @
I 18
u>
("')
C)
o
"<2'
'<t
...;
l'-
Nc::;
ZO
fI)'C
lJ) lD
~m
.... ()
-- 0
0-
('")>-
W~
~ g-
20:
~;::
~~
cr:::q!
~S
~ 00
cogjal
~-l.2:
o1?Ci
...J m c:: ~~
LO::;-O
C'l<:(/)
00::: Kl W
r.n '" E 0..
~ ~ g ~
N c;; t= c..
o ;:: '0 :J.
Z..... -= Z
LL 0 -::: 0
...J -l 9 ,^
(,)"0 ~ .."
i-lij~ ffi
+ 4:: '':; a..
(!) LO 0 Ui
ZNw!ii
c:, i,g (5
-l__tnZ
OOm <:
Wi;::CIl l-
-
cc cry 0') I)
r~ -::> L{)
-.- -::> ,,-
N~
,0
- ~ ("') x )< X l( )( " x
~ N ~ " .. ;:; .. ... ... .,
== >.~ ~ :; ~ d) '" N s:
CllCl'l ~ .. ::i ...
'::::::2~
CI'l CI'l ~ ~ ~ .i " ,; ~ ~
"Q 0.. .. '"' ""
a; ... !! ! if if ~ ~. oK ::<
0'"
:; ... :: '"! woc
rn .. ... .,; ~-<
<.t: .. '" ..
~ <> rdi
i I :z: i
xj ! i t ~ l2 .. I "Ii!
! ~ :z; ..<
:::, ~ .. l< i~ ....
'" .. .. <>
-<0 i e B tl :: <!It
! <>'" ;:'j a ~ i j IS ail! :~
oj ,~ g " i: :: %<
~ '" B !l 9 l a; :l <...
~ < l': '" u :z:
~ ..... Ci ~ ~ E; "''' 0.",
vel ... Ua: ~c
:s ... '"'z c ~rn~D~I~D .. ~I
" >- :;;::$ .. :z; ~9
~ 0 .. '" u ...
tl ::I ... a ~i
~ %0 ~ Ii! fi .....
~ ~ ~~ "'-
" e ..Jl . W <. !1i .. ... :; -:>
;:;; .. 0 .. .. ~.2.
,. .. '"
(
\
~,
<> ~
-<:(2) :: it
<> ~
~
II'
-0
l'
t ...
. ;g I
. - ,
I ;
-<
t g
l ~ i
:II
ht
~h
%
<
...J
. c-
o
:::ffi
"'l-
ll?
<
:::;;
::-=,"'"
"'~wf~
l~gd
! ;f~ f
- ilU
,'g=
~f
) ~~
, ~g
I
Zz
UJ<t
0-1
- (Yo..
<t -<t~
:: V) Ow
I ill I
r- _.1' -l r-
ffiQ<tlJ)
-<tU<
:1:z-~ ! I
X z
, I WJ -<t.
l-O I \ III II
I 0::) 'III \1'1
II
en · ! 1\) i I
Q.
Agenda Item No, 17B
f'Aay 26, 2009
Page 124 of 1 59
EXHIBIT <<B"
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
LOTS 60, 61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69 AND 95 OF NAPLES GROVE AND TRUCK
COMPANY'S LITTLE fARMS NO, 2 ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED
IN PLAT BOOK 1 AT PAGE 27 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY,
FLORIDA, LESS AND EXCEPT THE EAST 5.00 FEET OF SAID LOTS 60,61,62 AND 63;
AND LESS AND EXCEPT THE WEST 260.00 FEET OF THE SOUTH 534.00 FEET OF SAID
LOTS 60 AND 61; AND LESS AND EXCEPT THE WEST 160.00 FEET OF SAID LOT 60;
AND LESS ANn EXCEPT THE NORTH 50.00 FEET OF SAID LOT 60 FOR ROAD RlGHT-
. OF-WAY; AND LESS AND EXCEPT THE EAST 663.62 FEET OF THE NORTH HALF OF
SAID LOT 64; AND LESS AND EXCEPT THE EAST 220.00 FEET OF THE SOUTH HALF
OF SAID LOT 69, LESS THE NORTH 40.00 FEET THEREOF; AND LESS THE WEST
370.00 FEET OF THE EAST 660.00 FEET OF TIrE SOlITH HALF OF SAID LOT 69.
AND
A PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH,
RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE Pl~'..RTICULARLY
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
['
COMMENCE A T THE NORTH QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 23, TO\VNSHIP 50
SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE RUN SOOQOO'OTE,.
ALONG THE EAST LINE OFTRE NORTHWEST ,QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 23, FOR
A DISTANCE OF 50.00 FEET TO A POINT ONTRE SOUTHERLY RlGHT-OF-WAY LINE
OF THOMASSON DRlVE, A 100.00 FOOT RIGHT-OF-WAY, AS THE SAME IS SHOVlN
ON THE STATE OF FLORIDA STATE ROAD DEPARTMENT PJGHT-OF-WAY MAl' FOR
STATBROPill 5-858, SECTION 0353-150, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND THE
POINT OF BEGINNING 'OF THE PARCEL OF LMTD HEREIN DESCRIBED; THENCE RUN
S.89058'53"W., ALONG THE SOUTHERLYIUGHT-OF-WAYLINE OF THOMASSON
DRIVE, FOR A D1ST ANCE OF 1222.48 FEET TO THE BEGINNmG OF A TANGENTIAL
CIRCULAR CURVE, CONCA VE SOUTHEASTERLY; THENCE RUN SOUTH\VESTERL Y,
ALONG SAID RlGHT -OF~ WAY LINE AND ..<\.LONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE
LEFT, HAVING A R.ADPJS OF 50,00 FEET, TI-IROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF ~
89C>54 '49", SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 70.66 FEET AT BEARING OF S.45001 '28''W"
FOR A DISTANCE OF 78.46 FEET TO A POll\1T ON THE EASTERLY RIGID -OF- WAY
LINE OF FERN STREET, A 100,00 FOOT RlGHT-OF-WAY; THENCE RUN 8.00004'04"W.,
ALONG THE EASTERLY RIGHT -OF- WAY LINE OF FERN STREET, FOR A DTST ANCE
OF 1252.48 FEET; THENCE RUN" S.Ooo20'3S"W., ALONG THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-
\1.f A Y Ln\~E OF FERl..J STREET, FOR A DISTAl~CE OF 983.71 FEET TO A pon~T 30.00
FEET NORTHERLY OF, AS MEASURED AT RlGHT ANGLES TO, THE EASTERLY
PROLONGATION OF THE CENTERLINE OF BAY STREET AS THE SAME rs SHOVlN
ON THE PLAT OF NAPLES BA YVIEW ADDITION NO.1 ACCORDING TO THE PLAT
THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 4 AT PAGE 20 OF THE Pl]BLIC RJ~CORDS OF
~
20
;:-\'01 T.... r.._ ~
Agenda Item r~o, 17B
May 26, 2009
Page 125 of 159
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE RUN S.89048'55''E, FOR A DISTANCE OF
300.00 FEET; THENCE RUN S.Ooo20'38"W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 60.00 FEET; THENCE
RUN S.89048'55"E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 98.0.30 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EA.ST LINE
OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 23, SAID POINT BEING LOeA TED
30.00 FEET SOUTHERLY OF, AS MEASURED ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE
NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 23, THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT
67 OF NAPLES GROVE AND TRUCK COIMPANY'S LITTLE FARMS NO, 2 ACCORDING
TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1 AT PAGE 27 OF THE PUBLIC
RECORDS OF COLDER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE RUN N.OOoOO' 07"W., ALONG
THE EAST LINE OF TIlE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 23, FOR A
DISTANCE OF 2350.64 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
BEARINGS REFER TO THE EAST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION
23, TO'\iVNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS BEING
N.OooOO'07"W,
PROPERTY AREA: } 71.245 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
(
\
"
21
F.\PT Jf) r'tnru,.,..."nl..\t\.I.......I..... n....__:. I....... I . - .... .
Agenda item No, 17B
May 26,2009
Page 126 of 159
This Instrument prepared by:
Scott W. Duval, Esq.
Brennan, Manna & Diamond, PL
3301 Bonita Beach Road, Suite 202
Bonita Springs, Florida 34134
(239) 992-6578
SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED
THIS SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED is made this 30th day of January, 2006, between
NAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN, INC., a Florida not.for.profit corporation, Grantor, and
FLORIDA GULF COAST UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION, INC., a Florida not-for-profit
corporation, Grantee, whose post office address is 10501 FGCU Boulevard South, Fort
Myers, Florida 33965.
The Grantor, in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars ($10.00), and other good and
valuable consideration paid by the Grantee to the Grantor, the receipt of which is hereby
acknowledged, hereby conveys to Grantee the following described real property in Collier
County, Florida:
See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof (the
"Property")
Subject to: ad valorem taxes for the current year; East & South
Sewer District assessment; restrictions, requirements and
limitations imposed by government authority; outstanding oil, gas
and mineral rights, if any; and the Restrictions and Right of
Repurchase set forth on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and made a
part hereof.
Grantor fully warrants title to said land and will defend the same against the lawful
claims of all persons claiming by, under, ,or through Grantor.
NOTE: PURSUANT TO SECTION 12B-4.014 {2} (a) OF THE FLORIDA
ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, MINIMUM DOCUMENTARY STAMP TAXES ARE BEING
AFFIXED HERETO AS THIS TRANSACTION INVOLVES THE CONVEYANCE OF
UNENCUMBERED REAL TV AS A GIFT FOR NO CONSIDERATION.
-1-
Property 1.0. Number:
Grantee T[N:
Agenda Item No. 17B
May 26, 2009
Page 127 of 159
Witnesses:
~,
WIT~ESS
It/. TAL(c.. (/<'0 c./~~~
PRINTED NAME
-----c;:U -~ -C":) /~
WITNESS
~o.;l i-J. ])uvc...1
PRINTED NAME
-------
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF LEE
NAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN, INC., a
Florida not-for-profit corporation
B~c:7f~ ~
Brian Holley
Its: EXElcutive Director
--
(CORPORATE SEAL)
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 30th day of January,
2006, by Brian Holley, as Executive Director of Naples Botanical Garden, Inc., a Florida not-
for-profit corporation, who is ~sOf'fally known to me-:::: or who has produced
(type of identification) as identification and who
did (did not) take an oath.
1.~,~"IUlfll',.... SCOTT w~ DtltIH.
~"A~~~ MY COMMISSION' DD 362307
~~~ - EXPIRES: Oclober23, 2008
"~II";-';'~ ~ThnlNOW)IPubl1o:Ur>:lelwlft...
, IIU\l\
~_.~
Signature
C2 ~
,/
Printed Name
-2-
Agenda Item No, 17B
May 26, 2009
Page 128 of 159
Exhibit "Au
Being part of Lot 61 of Naples Grove and Trucking Company's little Farms No.
2, Plat Book 1, Page 27, Collier County, Florida.
Commencing at the North 11.1 corner of Section 23, Township 50 South, Range
25 East, Colller County, Florida; Thence South 00012'51" East 49.97 feet to a
point on the South rIght-at-way of Thomasson Drive; Thence along said South
right-at-way North 89"46'23" East 1317.21 feet to a point on the West right-of-
way line of Bayshore Drive; Thence South along said West right-ot-way of
Bayshore Drive South 00042'39" East 340.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING;
Thence continuing along said right-ot-way South 00"42'39" East 280.00 feet;
Thence leaving said right-of-way South 89045'23" West 360.00 feet; Thence
North 00042'39" West 280.00 feet; Thence North 89045'23" East 360.00 feet to
the POINT OF BEGINNING.
Bearings are based on the South right-of-way of Thomasson Drive, being
North 89046'23" East.
Agenda Item No, 17B
May 26, 2009
Page 129 of 159
EXHIBIT "B"
RESTRICTIONS AND RIGHT OF REPURCHASE
Naples Botanical Garden, Inc., as Grantor, and Florida Gulf Coast University Foundation.
Inc., as Grantee, hereby agree to the following terms and conditions of the restrictions and
right of repurchase, which shall burden and run with the Property according to such terms:
1. Intended Purpose. Naples Botanical Garden, Inc. (hereinafter "NBG") and
Florida Gulf Coast University Foundation, Inc., its successors and or assigns (hereinafter
"FGCIJ") acknowledge and agree that the Property and the facility to be constructed
thereon (the "Center"), is to be used as a research and education facility focused primarify
in, but not limited to, the areas of ethnobotany, botanical and environmental science,
ecology, entomology and COrlservation biology (the "Intended Purpose").
2. Commencement of Construction and Operations. Subject to the additional
terms and conditions set forth in that certain Land Transfer Agreement dated January 30,
2006 (the "Transfer Agreement") and that certain Operational Memorandum of
Understanding dated January 30, 2006 (the "MOU"), both of which are incorporated herein
by reference, the parties hereby agree as follows:
a. FGCU shall diligently proceed with the permitting and construcUon of
the Center pursuant to the terms and conditions set forth in the Transfer
Agreement.
b. FGCU shall maintain the Center pursuant to the terms and conditions
set forth in the Transfer Agreement and the MOU.
3. Riqht of Repurchase. From the date of recording of this deed to the
Termination Date, as defined below, NBG shall have a continual right to repurchase the
Property as follows:
a. In the event FGCU desires to sell, abandons the Center, fails to
construct or operate the Center, or fails to maintain the Center, all as required by
the Transfer Agreement or the MOU, beyond any applicable notice and cure
periods provided therein, NBG shall have a continual right to repurchase the
Property, including the Center. If NBG elects to exercise its right to repurchase the
Property, the purchase price shall be equal to the stated book value for the Center
(assuming a basis in the Property of zero dollars ($0.00) and taking into
consideration straight line depreciation assuming a useful life of the Center of fifty
(50) years, as shown on the most recent financial records of FGCU) less Two
Million Dollars ($2,000,000.00). Such purchase price of the Property shall, in no
event, be less than Ten Dollars ($10.00). Other than the fixtures that are deemed
-3-
Agenda Item No. 17B
May 26, 2009
Page 130 of 159
to be a part of the realty, any such purchase shall not indude the contents of the
building owned by the Foundation and/or FGCU.
b. In the event, for any reason, FGCU is required to return any
contributions or Courtelis Fund grant funds received for the construction of the
Center, such that the Center will not be constructed within the timeframe set forth in
the Transfer Agreement, then FGCU shall immediately deed the Property back to
NBG (by Special Warranty Deed) for no consideration and without any notice
required by NBG or arbitration between the parties. It being the intent of the parties
that without the ability to construct the Center. all parties should be returned to their
status as it existed immediately prior to this transfer.
c. In the event NBG elects to exercise its right of repurchase as set forth
herein, NBG shall provide written notice to FGCU of its intent to repurchase the
Property. FGCU shall have thirty (30) days from receipt of such notice to demand
mediation of the issue, by a court certified mediator, whose determination shall be
binding on the parties, and the cost of such mediation shall be split equaHy between
the parties. If mediation is demanded by FGCU, then FGCU shall provide the
name of no less than five (5) mediators and NBG shall select a mediator from such
list, or otherwise provide five (5) alternative selections to FGCU, which shall then
select the mediator. If the parties cannot agree on a mediator, the parties shall
petition the court to appoint a mediator.
4. Duration. The restrictions and right of repurchase set forth in this Exhibit "B"
shall be valid and shall constitute a covenant running with the Property for a period of Fifty
(50) years from the date of recording of this deed (the "Termination Date"). Upon
expiration of these restrictions and the right of repurchase, they shall be of no further force
or effect without the need to record any additional documentation.
FGCU, by it's execution below, hereby acknowledges the reasonableness and acceptance
of the above restrictions and the right of repurchase for NBG.
FLORIDA GULF COAST UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION,
INC., a Florida not-for-profit corporation
By: A ,<-+
Steve Magiera
Its: Executive Director
-4-
FGCU @ NAPLES BOTANICAL GARDENS
SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN
SUPPLEMENTAL TIS NARRATIVE
Prepared For:
FGCU
Prepared By:
WilsOnMiller
'"
New Directiofls In Planning, Design & Engineering
Wilson Professional Center
3200 Bailey Lane, Suite 200
Naples, FL 34105
July 1, 2008
Prepared by
Jeffory L Perry, AICP
Agenda Item No. 17B
May 26. 2009
Page 131 of 159
Agenda Item No, 17B
iv1ay 26, 2009
Pa;je 132 of 159
Table of Contents
. Narrative........,......"...,.......,. ........,.,....,.,.,.......,.., ..........,...,." ......,......, ................... ......"......2
. Naples Botanical Garden SDP TIS .....................................................................................4
7/1/2008 - 203735. Ver: 1 - JPERRY
25555-555-555 - - 00000
Agenda Item No, 17B
May 26, 2009
Page 133 of 159
2
FGCU Research Laboratory at Naples Botanical Gardens
Supplemental Traffic Impact Statement
Background
The FGCU Research Laboratory is located on a 2,3:t acre outparcel within the Naples Botanical
Gardens PUD. Although referenced on the approved SDP for the Naples Botanical Gardens
(NBG), the SDP excluded the FGCU site for site planning purposes, however, the FGCU site
gains access thru the approved NBG driveway connections.
A research facility is an ancillary use customarily found at a botanical garden, and is frequently
associated with a local university or community college. Activities are usually limited to
infrequent visits by student or professorial researchers, and academic facilities are less likely to
be "open to the public", except for "thru-the-glass" viewing exhibits. Additionally, a multi-
purpose use facility planned for the site can accommodate the occasional "special event",
although those types of events are infrequent and associated impacts do not usually coincide
with the peak hour of the adjacent street.
The average daily activities do not generally generate any measurable traffic due to the limited
number of "researchers" that might occupy the premises at anyone time, and since the entering
and exiting traffic frequently does not correspond to the peak hours of the adjacent street nor for
that matter the hours of operation of the botanical garden,
The original Traffic Impact Statement provided for the PUD rezone, and subsequently for the
NBG SDP (attached), included the impacts for entire 171:t acre site. Traffic impacts that were
estimated could reasonably be associated with all patron activities, employees, maintenance,
etc.
The County Transportation Department has requested that as part of the FGCU SDP
application, the approved TIS and this supplemental narrative be provided. Staff has also
requested that we estimate what portion of the approved total traffic impact would be associated
with the FGCU facility. For the purposes of this supplement, we have estimated that the FGCU
site would generate four (4) p,m. peak hour trips based upon an average of four (4) researchers
occupying (and exiting) the site during the peak hour. While certainly on some days there may
be more than four researcher on site during the peak hour, and on some days there will be less
(or none) exiting during the peak hour. Based upon the size of the facility proposed, four
researchers would appear to be a reasonable estimate.
Using the approved TIS as a basis for quantifying the total project impacts, and further, the
individual FGCU/NBG components of the total, the following table estimates what portion of the
total approved project traffic previously identified can be reasonably associated 'v"lith each
component.
7/1/2008.203735. Ver: 1 - JPERRY
25555-555.555 - - 00000
Agenda Item t'Jo, 17B
iv'1ay 26, 2009
Page 134 of 159
3
Estimated Total rrafficfa't Build-Out
As stated above, access to FGCU and the associated parking area for the facility will obtain
access through the approved NBG site access connections. The FGCU site will be
interconnected through the NBG site in order to access both the Thomasson Drive access
(serving employee parking) and the main Bayshore Road access point.
Conclusions
The FGCU Research Laboratory is being constructed as an integral part of the NBG site. The
TIS originally prepared for the Naples Botanical Gardens PUD anticipated the potential
development of a research facility on the site, The PUD traffic forecast included the
development of the entire 171:t acre site, and accounted for the impacts of the research facility
in the forecast estimate of total traffic. The applicant has estimated that less than 5% of the
total p,m, peak hour traffic will be generated by the FGCU research facility.
7/112008 - 203735 - Ver' 1 - JPERRY
Z5555-555-555 - 00000
NAPLES BOTANICAL GARDENS
SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN
TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT
Prepared For:
Botanical Gardens, Inc.
4820 Bayshore Road
Naples, FL 34112
Prepared By:
WilsDnMiller
r
New DirectiDns In Planning, Design & Engineering
Wilson Professional Center
3200 Bailey Lane, Suite 200
Naples, FL 34105
August 8, 2007
Revision 1, October 24, 2007
Prepared by
Jeffory L Perry, AICP
Agenda Item No, 17B
May 26, 2009
Page 135 of 159
Agenda Item ~Jo, 17B
May 26, 2009
Page 136 of 159
Table of Contents
. Project Location & Description .......... .............. ...... ....... ........ .... .... .... ................ ... ....1
. Methodology...................................,.....,.................................................................2
. T ri p G en e ra ti 0 n ........... . . .. . .. . .. . .. . .. . .. . .. . .. .. .. .. . .. . .. . .. . .. . .. . .. . .. . . .. .. . .. . . . .. . .. .. . .. .. . . .. .. .. . . .. . .. 3
. Site Access & Project Trip Distribution ...................................................................3
. Internal Capture .............,........................................................................................6
. Pass-by Capture.....................................................................................................6
. Arterial/Collector Level of Service Analysis ............................................................6
. Intersection Level of Service Analysis ....................................................................7
. Turn Lanes................................................................................................ ..............8
. Conclusions & Recommendations .........................................................................9
. Append ix ....................................................,........,...,.............................,................1 0
Aqenda Item No. 17B
~ May 26, 2009
Page 137 of 159
Naples Botanical Gardens
Site Development Plan Traffic Impact Statement
Project Location & Description
Site Location
The subject property is a 171 +/- acre parcel located in the southwest quadrant of the
intersection of Bayshore Road and Thomasson Drive. A site location map is shown in Figure 1.
Project Description
The site is the location of the existing Naples Botanical Gardens facilities. The proposed
expansion included in the Site Development Plan (SOP) application would provide for the
expansion of internal exhibit space as well as the expansion of exterior garden spaces.
Figure 1
,,".': 1C:lI_
II,,.
..'.;.,~:.~ III
IiIIIIII
.-.-=.
.'-.....
.. .-
.. ..- III
.. ...
III' _ III
-
..
..
!,..~ ,-,.
~~
....
..
ill
......
..
.
.-
BiZ'JII
.
.
..
.
,~.;~. :,.1.. ,;;:. :..,'t
;::,?\,!I~~~.
"J 1II!!t1i,
:tU!d' ....
;'~.r.r7~~A~
.,.",.
..I.-
.P...
II. IIIiJl
..... - ...
.
....,...
., IIllI
-- ..
. -.
.. I. ......
L'~..' '. _ ... ,
.... .-...
I. J.-._ -'..11".""" ·
11- II 1& .1- .-.....:. - - ..
.l'!! DoII11I . IZllI - - ..-.
II I ""II" -:.... __1Iw-'
ill.. JI ... -
"I!III .. - - -. II' ...-- ·
.. III _._ _._ 1."- III .B
.. .. .' . ---- I
..... . ... _ 11I".-::- ..... I!II
.. .....__ _._ _.......I!l'. ..
. ",11 _II ~ - Ill.. .......
..-::,.... .... 11I."11 ..
..~ .--1_' - ... - IiIIl rE.. II II
II .. .-. 'II 1iIiI" - III
.E III II .....-1...--...... 1IIi: ·
_ _11II.. .-If'I!.
.. ..... .IB __.. 1-
IflI!! _II ...- 11--
!l!I!III 1li!IR" " -- DIll .-
_ Il'IIIIII!IJ III...... 11I-""
-.-..-.
IlIIIIlI:i:iI ~"'41',~ '..",,:.;,"..._,;~
8/24/2007 - 192501 - Ver: 2 ~ JPERRY
CA#43
Z5555~555-555 - .00008/8/2007 - 192501 - Ver: 1 - JPERRY
CA#43
25555,555-555 - . OOOOCA#43
'. ..
I" ...~".
:!.
-..
'-~:~i'
~
..
III
.. rt~ .~..,J1J
II --._
..
1
,~
,~
..
-
-
~~*..
JF
'14
Agenda item i\lo. 17B
rv'lay 26, 2009
Page 138 of 159
In addition to the expansion of the buildings, site improvements will also involve the
reconfiguring of the existing driveways and parking lots. What is today the "visitor's lot" with
access from Thomasson Drive, will in the future become parking for employees and volunteers,
and the parking area that is currently utilized on the Bay Shore Drive side of the site as
employee parking will become the main visitor's parking area.
Methodology
An SDP Pre-Application meeting for this project was held on January 10, 2007, and a follow-up
transportation methodology meeting was held on January 16, 2007. During the methodology
meeting an appropriate trip generation methodology \tvas discussed since an equivalent of
Transportation Engineers Land Use does not exist for this type of project. The previously
approved Rezone TIS included a Trip Generation Analysis developed using a similar botanical
garden facility. Trip rates (vehicle occupancy rates) were used as factors to calculate build-out
trips assuming 181,000 visitors per year, in order to quantify the a,m. and p.m, peak hour
weekday trips. Even though the Botanical gardens has revised it's estimated annual visitors (at
build-out) to 142,000, it was agreed that the original estimate of build-out traffic used in the
Rezone TIS would form the basis for computing the anticipated increase in traffic over what
currently exist today. It was also agreed that the directional distribution of traffic would also be
consistent with that previous analysis.
Traffic volumes at the two existing driveway connections were counted for three days in early
April 2007. The maximum a.m. and p.m. peak hour volumes recorded for any of the three days
are shown in Table 1.
Table 1
.
Bayshore Road (In/Out)
18 (12/6)
14 (9/5)
Thomasson Drive (In/Out)
o (0/0)
22(11/11)
18 (12/6)
36 (20/16)
Build-out traffic volumes expected as a result of the expansion, based upon the previously
approved Rezone TIS, and the resulting Net New increase in traffic are shown in Table 2.
Table 2
B.m, Pk +-Ir (2-Way"Trnffic) lp.m. PkiHr (2-Way"Tra'ffic) , .
Estirnated TraffjcatBuild-Out
ExistiJl9 Traffic'
Net New Traffic
47 (31/16)
18 (12/6)
29 (19/10)
89 (45/44)
36 (20/16)
53 (29/24)
Based upon the expected increases in traffic resulting from the proposed expansion, this project
will qualify as a "Minor Study" pursuant to the guidelines adopted by Collier County.
8/24/2007 - 192501 - Ver 2 - JPERRY
CA#43
Z5555-555-555 - - ??oo818:2007 - 192501 Ver: 1 . JPERRY
CA#43
:::5555-555--555. .OOOOCA#43
2
Agenda Item No, 178
May 26, 2009
Page 139 of 159
Trip Generation
As stated above, no equivalent trip generation rates are available from the Institute of
Transportation Engineers Trip Generation, 7th ed. Trip generation for the build-out was
assumed to be as previously approved (during the rezoning of the property), and is shown in
Table 3. The existing traffic volumes from Phase I of the project have already been accounted
for in the County's Concurrency System, and in fact, those trips already exist in the travel
stream; therefore the projects estimated "net new trips" are calculated to determine what project
traffic needs to be added to background traffic to form the basis for the future conditions. The
trip generation characteristics are shown in Table 3.
Table 3
Visitors per Year
Visitors per Vehicle
Vehicles per Year
Vehicles perWeekday (Peak Season)
Estimated Traffic at Build~dut. ,.
Existh'lg Traffic
Net New Traffic
47 (40/7)
18 (12/6)
29 (28/1)
89 (45/44)
36 (20/16)
53 (25/28)
Site Access & Project Trip Distribution
Access to the project site is from Bayshore Road on the east side of the site and Thomasson
Drive on the north side. As mentioned previously, the expansion projects calls for the
rearranging of the parking areas in such a way that the future traffic distribution at the driveway
connections will be different than it is today, As such, the build-out conditions analysis, which
includes an analysis of the intersection of Bayshore Road and Thomasson Drive, assumes the
modified parking program.
The Rezone analysis assumed a distribution of 70% project traffic traveling N/S along Bayshore
Road to US 41 and 30% traveling E/W along Thomasson Drive to US 41. Due to the "dead
end" nature of both Bayshore Road to the south and Thomasson Drive to the west, no project
traffic was distributed to either of those directions, and therefore for analysis purposes, all of the
project traffic was assumed to impact the Bayshore/Thomasson intersection.
Existing traffic entering and exiting the site does so at two driveway locations. The driveway
connection on Thomasson Drive, today serves as the primary access to/from the visitor's
parking area while the driveway connecting to Bayshore Road serves as the
employees/volunteers access. Today, about 39% of the total p.m. peak hour traffic enters/exits
the site via Bayshore Road while 61 % uses the Thomasson Drive access. The distribution of
existing p.m. peak hour traffic is shown in Figure 2.
8/24/2007 - 192501 - Vsr: 2 - JPERRY
CA#43
Z5555-555-555 - - 000081812007 - Hl2501 - Ver 1 - JPERRY
CA#43
25555-555"555 - - OOOOCAtt43
3
Agenda Item ~,Jo, 17B
May 26, 2009
Page 140 of 159
Figure 2 - Existing P.M. Peak Hour Project Traffic
Bayshore Dr.
25 70%
i It
11 114
{I. 1
!
; d II
4' 11
~ 3
4' 2
~ 5
Thomasson Dr.
i {I.
61%: 11
8 ,p
3 ~
~!J2
~31:~_. ~
5 ~
9 ,p
-----
14
1130%
6 ~
It fP
6 3
SITE
It
9
16 Entering
20 Exiting
36 2-Way Trips
As proposed, the build-out SDP land plan reconfigures the parking facilities and re-designates
the parking lot accessed via Bayshore Road for use by visitors (and FGCU staff), and the lot
accessed via Thomasson Drive for NBG employees (and volunteers). The traffic utilizing
Bayshore Drive will access either through the main entrance or may use a second auxiliary
driveway at the south end of the parking lot (1), Based upon the size of the parking lots this
analysis assumes 85% of the total project traffic at build-out will access the site via Bayshore
Road and the remaining 15% via Thomasson Drive, In addition to assessing and evaluating the
link impacts, this distribution was used to conduct the intersection analysis of Bayshore Road
and Thomasson Drive.
Figure 3 reflects the distribution of p,m, peak hour project trips at build-out.
(1) Revision 1, October 24. 2007
B/24/2007 - 192501 - Ver: 2 - JPERRY
CA#43
Z5555-555-555 - - 0000818/2007 - 192501. Ver 1. JPERRY
CA#43
25555-555-555. . OOOC:;A#43
4
Agenda Item No, 17B
May 26, 2009
Page 141 of 159
Figure 3 - P.M, Peak Hour Project Traffic (Build-out) (1)
#" 7
5 ,p
2 c::>
'.(). ~:J
15%! 7 7!
36
SITE!:i~ _ _ <!
36,3 <:=0
45 Entering 33 ,p
44 Exiting -.--]
89 2-Way Trips _ _ _ _
o <:=0
4 ,p
----11
(1) Revision 1, October 24. 2007
Bayshore Dr,
63 (70%)
I iI
32 : 31
.(). I
I
I
5 27 I
<! .().I
<:=0 2 <:=0 13
#" 11 Thomasson Dr.
.------------
26 (30%)
13 0:;>
I iI
I 26
I
I
I iI
I 37
I
I
I
I
.
~
11
Existing project traffic is already accounted for in the County Concurrency Management System,
and therefore, for the purposes of this application it is necessary to identify the "net new" project
traffic. Under normal conditions, it is simply a matter of subtracting the existing volumes from
the build-out volumes. With respect to the volumes along segments north and east of the
intersection that is the case, however, because the proposed land plan modifies the access
priorities, a different set of turning movements at the intersection of Bayshore Road and
Thomasson Drive result, so volumes along the segments south and west of the intersection are
proportionately different in the build-out case. The distribution of the "net new" p.m. peak hour
traffic is shown in Figure 4.
8/24/2007. 192501 . Ver: 2 - JPERRY
CA#43
Z5555-555-555. - OOOOBtBl2007 - 192501- Ver: 1 - JPERRY
CA#43
25555-555.555 - - OOOOCA#43
5
Agenda Item No, 17B
fv1ay 26, 2009
Page 142 of 159
Figure 4 - P.M. Peak Hour Net New Project Traffic (Build-out) (1)
Bayshore Dr,
37 (70%)
I if
18 : 20
11.,
II ~ ~i
# 4
3 ,p
1 ~
'-I} if']
15%! 4 4 I
21
SITE : BE~ _ _ ()'
21 4:>
25 Entering 20,p
28 Exiting . - - - -I]
53 2-Way Trips. _ _ __
o 4:>
4 ,p
.----11
", Revision "1, October 24, 2007
Internal Capture
There is no internal capture being assumed,
Pass-by Capture
There is no pass-by capture being assumed.
Arterial/Collector Level of Service Analysis
4:> 1 4:> 8
# 6 Thomasson Dr,
------------
16 (30%)
8 ~
I if
117
I
I
I iJ
I 24
I
I
I
I
if
7
Using the standards in the TIS Guidelines. project traffic is significant for the purposes of the
TIS analysis if the net new trips equal or exceed 2% of the peak hour service volume on
'directiy accessed" iink(s) or the next adjacent iinks, or equal to or greater than 3% of the peak
h_.,,,, ,..._"""i__ ,,_ll'~_ ,....; ""1 Ih"",..._1l_t'"'O.f. li.....I..-..... ..._ ..,h;_h _........;............. ......_U"i_ :..... ,..,......:_-_.....
IIUUI "vi v IvC;; VUIUIII'V' UI ,:;)UU~C'YUt:;;lll III If\.;::) LU VYllllvl1 tJl UJC;vl 1I GlIII....... t.:::> a;:";;:'I!:::::fIIC'U.
8/24/2007 - 192501 - Vel' 2 - JPERRY
CA#43
25555-555-555 - - 0000818/2007 - 192501 - Ver: 1 - JP:::RRY
CA#43
Z5555.555-555. .OOOOC:AIJ43
6
Agenda Item No. 17B
May 26, 2009
Page 143 of 159
Table 4 shows the conditions on Bayshore Road and Thomasson Drive. Project traffic creates
an insignificant impact on all segments except for the portion of Bayshore Road fronting the site,
south of the intersection to the project entrance. It should be noted that this is a dead end road
that carries only 87 southbound trips and 75 northbound during the p.m. peak hour. It should
also be noted that even though the project generates insignificant impact on the other directly
accessed roadway and all adjacent roads, all roads are operating at acceptable levels of
service.
Table 4
5rvc, ;Project % nf
AUIR# Lane Vol 2% 'Pk Dlr Trips Std
-5
West of Bayshore NA 2 760 15 WB 4 ,5%
Road
,." East of Bayshore 108 2 760 15 EB 8 1%
Road
North of Thomasson 7 4 1950 39 SB 18 .9%
Drive
South of Thomasson NA 2 760 15 SB 21 2.8%
Drive
g~'i?~;r:%;;/'t;j'.,.;:~;1~T'\t.:)'~':; ','
Intersection Level of Service Analysis
During the methodology meeting, County staff requested an analysis of the intersection of
Bayshore Road and Thomasson Drive, a 4-way stop-controlled intersection in the PM peak
period. Wilson Miller collected turning movement counts on April 5, 2007 (copy attached in the
Appendix).
An examination of historical traffic count information provided by Collier County indicates an
annual decline in volumes on Bayshore Road over the past five (5) years (2006 Report included
in the Appendix), so for the purposes of this analysis, no growth rate was applied to the
existing approach volumes.
Because the existing volumes counted passing through the intersection include existing
Botanical Garden traffic, it was necessary to "back out" the existing project trips occurring during
the p.m. peak hour from the total traffic in order to create a true background traffic volume
before adding back in all of the project traffic at build-out. This was done in order to account for
the shift in the turning movements resulting from the changes in the land plan (parking area
assignments).
The existing intersection geometry is shown below in Figure 5. A review of the intersection
analysis indicates that adequate turn-lanes currently exist.
8/24/2007.192501. Ver: 2. JPERRY
CA#43
Z5555-555.555 - - 00008/812007 - 192501 - Vsr, 1 - JPERRY
CA#43
Z5555-555-555 - .OOOOCA#43
7
Agenda Item No, 178
May 26, 2009
Page 144 of 159
Figure 5
The existing unsignalized conditions and the "full-build" unsignalized conditions were analyzed
using the SYNCHRO 6 software. SYNCHRO quantifies the performance of unsignalized
intersections with an "Intersection Capacity Utilization" (ICU) percentage and level of serv'ice
grade. Table 5 shows the level of service summary for this intersection with and without the
additional project traffic. The SYNCHRO reports are included in the Appendix.
Table 5
, Intersection 'Capacity :utilization {ICU) ,?A:, lClI l'BVeI o'f Setivoe "
Existing Conditions<
Build-Out Conditions
36,1%
36,6%
A
A
Turn Lanes
Collier County turn-lane policies require project entrance lanes when the highest hourly right
turning volume equals or exceeds 4% of the service volume (at LOS "C") or 40 or more
vehicles. Left turn lanes are required when the highest hourly volume of left turns is equal or
exceeds 2% of the LOS or is 20 or more vehicles, LOS "C" directional service volume for both
Bayshore Road and Thomasson Drive at the project's entrances is 480. The turn lane warrant
analysis is shown in Table 6.
8124/2007 - 192501 - Ver: 2 - JPERRY
CA#43
Z5555~555-555 - - 00008l8l2oo7 - 192501 - Ver 1 - JPERRY
CA#43
25555-555-555 - .OOOOCA#43
8
Agenda Item No, 178
May 26, 2009
Page 145 of 159
Table 6
Srvc, % of % D'f Project Req'd
Project VDL @ Btd Std'RT "Tnps (Y/N)
:tntr-ance .Lanes .LOS "C" 1.'T (2%) (4%)
. ~~~~:?j.~?/;;':~?
Thomasson ." . '
Drive.;:.;'........
~~~~f?~~.;......'.....
. Bayshore . .
Roael '.'
West of Bayshore
Road
West of Bayshore
Road
South of
Thomasson Drive
South of
Thomasson Drive
2
480
10
4
N
2
480
19
o
N
2
480
10
o
N
2
480
19
21
Y
The only turning movement volumes that meet the County's turn lane warrant criteria are the
southbound right-turning volumes along Bayshore Road, and only when the total southbound
right-turning traffic volumes are considered in the aggregate; however, because the land plan is
proposing multiple access connections on Bayshore Drive, when disaggregated, the volumes at
each driveway would not likely meet the warrants. That being said, the applicant is constructing
a southbound turn lane for the first (and primary) access point which is expected to serve 90-
95% of all entering vehicles. Any remaining entering vehicles that use the secondary access at
the south end of the parking area will not trigger the warrants for an additional turn lane.
Conclusions & Recommendations
The net new project traffic at build-out will not adversely impact any area roadways, nor require
any additional improvements to the adjacent roadway network. With project traffic, all adjacent
facilities (links and intersections) continue to operate at acceptable levels of service. A turn lane
for southbound right-turning vehicles will be provided at the primary access point on Bayshore
Road that serves the main visitor parking area (and the proposed FGCU research facility).
Employee (and volunteer) traffic will be served by a secondary access point on Thomasson
Drive that serves the employee parking area.
8124/2007 - 192501 - Ver: 2. JPERRY
CM43
Z5555-555-555 - - 00008/8/2007 - 192501 - Ver: 1 - JPERRY
CA#43
Z5555-555-555 - - OOOOCA#43
9
Agenda Item No, 17B
May 26, 2009
Page 146 of 159
APPENDIX
8/24/2007 - 192501 - Ver: 2 - JPERRY
CA#43
25555-555-555 - - 00008/8/2007 - 192501 - Ver: ~ - JPERRY
CA#43
Z5555-555-555 - - OOOOCA#43
10
Florida Transportation Engineering, Inc.
8250 Pascal Drive
Punta Gorda, FL 33950
Ph# (941)6392818
File Name
Site Code
Start Date
Page No
Agenda Item No, 17B
rvlay 26, 2009
Page 147 of 159
Bayshore Blvd and Thomason Drive
00004370
4/5/2007
:2
App, i Inl
Total Total
15',tS I .oJ I ;"s I
42 f,'j ~::5 J 3I<J ~ ;: ii .m :'ll ~. ;2 .. !l ~r. n ':1 .:; tee
,:.,; i;: .. .... ~,
13.2 16,0 70,8 0,0 65,5 20,3 14,2 0,0 16,0 81,3 2,7 0,0 10.5 35,5 53,9 0,0
13 9 62 0 B4 31 21 8 0 60 1 19 0 0 20 1 8 6 0 13 177
0,941
17:15
13
o
16:45
85' 31
0,935/
14
58
21
17:00
60 I 5
0,821
24
8
o
17:15
o 30 4
0,625
11
18
o
33 I
0.576 I
Counter: 4370
Counted By: Nash
Weather: Good
Other.
Bayshore Blvd
Southbound
Start Time Ri ht Tnru Left I Peds
07:00 6 5 18 0
07:15 6 4 15 0
07:30 3 3 18 0
07:45 4 7 18 0
Total 19 19 69 0
08:00 6 3 14 Q
08:15 4 1 15 0
08:30 3 2 21 0
08:45 2 4 24 ()
Total 15 10 74 01
.~ BREAK ...
Florida Transportation Engineering, I nc,
8250 Pascal Drive
Punta Gorda, FL 33950
Ph# (941 )6392818
Agenda Item No, 178
fJlay 26, 2009
Pa;)e 148 of159
File Name
Site Code
Start Date
Page No
: Bayshore Blvd and Thomason Dri"
: 00004370
: 4/5/2007
: 1
Groups Printed- Cars, Trucks and Ped
Thomason Drive Bayshore Blvd
Westbound Northbound
Ri -fil' I Thru Left T Peds Ri hl Thru Left
22 4 3 0 6 17 1
20 4 4 0 3 14 0
8 10 2 0 1 11 1
15 4 0 0 2 7 0
65 22 9 0 12 49 2
Peds
()
o
0,
01
0:
Int TOl8l'
97
88
64
66
315
14 1 3 0 0 12 4 01 1 3 7 0 68
22 3 5 () 1 11 0 oj 0 4 10 0 76
26 8 3 0 :2 9 1 ~I 1 6 10 0 92
21 5 1 0 1 10 1 5 8 5 0 87
83 i7 ;2 01 4 42 6 01 7 21 32 0 323
16:00
16:15
16:30
16:45
Total
12
10
7
13
42
11 50 ~ 43
~ _;~ ~. __ ~L,
9 62 0 31
34 --~- 0 --122
12
4
5
21
42
9 0 I
,. ~ .-~I
28 0 I
~.,-~~ - ___ ~ ~ I l,~ _L___1i-,~" ~11-,_ m
18 60 1 + 8 28 34 J:t 609
17:00
17:15
17:30 .
'17'45
Total
9
13
7
15
.<<-
12 55 0 36 6 '-l 5 24 1 j 2 4 11 0' 172
14 58 0 32 6 7 0 2 8 0 4 11 16 01 173
16 50 0 30 _~_J... ~_ 4 10 1 1 6 6 0.L_ 144
12."'- 32 0 40 u 3 5 5 2 9 --.&--+1, ~~
54 195 0 138 28 27 0 u 14 47 7 9 30
117 530 Q,g I 406 109 78 0~1 48 196 16 o.g I 24 110 124 o,g I 1880
15.3 69.1 68,8 18.4 12,6 16.3 75,6 6.1 9.3 42,6 48.1
6.2 28,2 0,0 21,7 5,8 40 0,0 2,6 10,5 0,9 0,0 1.3 5,9 6,6 0,0
"aysnore I
Out In Total
L~ C;rm I 14971
I-'-~."I
Ll2QL 1171 5301 -~
Ri~ht Tnru Le1'l Peds
I
..... .l. ...
Grand Tolal
Apprch %
Total %
120
15,6
6.4
]j~~ ~~"" j
~ 'l-I~-
~
;!: O2
~ -sr I;:~F-'~
L.I ~"'.<:
i.nl i~"l.
8i~1 0 Ih
l..J I~
_._J
i
North
t <!ll!
.-{Q ...
::.TIOI
.....llXl1
..-~I:
20
to
,I !
~(tl I
,j. :::>....,
1m;
~r-i
UI~
14/512007 7:00:00 AM-~.
14/512007 5:45:00 PM
I
',Cars, Trucks anel Peel ~
~.. ,,J
,...... 0
I~ i[
· - i I ~
..1~_ Thru Right Pe~
......._1~ L_~_ ,~_..9_
i-2m r-262 I ; 4791
Cllil. . '-in -Tolai~
Counter:
- Counted By:
Neather:
Other:
4370
Nash
Good
Bayshore Blvd
Southbound
Start Time Ri ht . Tnru Left Peds
... BREAK -
08:30
-* BREAK .*",
Total
***BREAK."
17:15
... BREAK -
Total
Grand Tolal
Apprch %
Tolal%
-
Florida Transportation Engineering, Inc.
8250 Pascal Drive
Punta Gorda, FL 33950
Ph# (941)6392818
Agenda Item No, 17B
May 26, 2009
Page 1LJ9 of 159
File Name: Bayshore Blvd and Thomason Drive
Site Code : 00004370
Start Date : 4/512007
Page No : 1
Grou s Printed- Trucks and Bikes
Thomason Drive I Bayshore Blvd
VVe~bound I Northbound
Thru Left Peds Ri ht Thru Left Peds
Thomason Drive
Eastbound
Ri hI Thru ... Left Peds
0 0 01 0 0 0 01 0 2 0 01 0 0 0 01 3
0 0 01 0 0 0 01 0 2 0 -01 0 0 0 01 3
0 0 0 01 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 01 0 0 01
() 0 0 01 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 01 0 0 01
0 0 1 o.~ I 0 0 0 o,~ I 0 2 0 o.~ I 1 0 0 01 4
0.0 0,0 100.0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 0,0 0,0 0,0 I
0,0 0,0 25,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 50,0 0.0 0.0 25,0 0,0 0,0 0,0
aye ore I
Out In Total
~ 9 ~
, l.r~-l 01
CLOI 01
:tt Thru Left Peds
1 '-+
I
...J
T
North
.~ D
L,5' 0
.-1 0 g
+~" ~
10 '0
I II>
~I i~
fil-o _!!!.
. e15!2007 7:00:00' AM 'J
1:1512007 5:45:00 PM
, Trucks and Bikes ....,
I-~--
Florida Transportation Engineering, Inc,
8250 Pascal Drive
Punta Garda, FL 33950
Ph# (941 )6392818
Agenda Item No, 17B
May 26, 2009
Pa;je 150 of 159
File Name
Site Code
Start 0 ate
Page No
: Bayshore Blvd and Thomason Drlv"
: 00004370
: 4/512007
:2
r'--- --- ----- ------..--
I
Start Time Right I Thru App, Right L~h~U 1 left
L--_, __,_ Tota/
Peak Hour From 07:00 to 17:45 - Peak 1 of 1
I ~tersectlon 07:45
Volume 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 ,2 0 0 0 0 0 3
Percent 0,0 0,0 100, 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 100, 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0,0
0 0
08:30 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 2 0 0 2 ; 0 0 0 0 0 3
Volume
Peak Factor 0.250
High int G8:30 1 16:45~OO AM 0 ' u6:3u 6:45:00 AM
Volume 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 2 0 0 2
Peak Factor 0,250 0,250
Agenda Item No, 17B
May 26,2009
FLORIDA TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING, INC. Page 151 of 159
8250 PASCAL DR. Page 1
PH# (941) 639 2818. (800)-639-4851 Site Code: 140132600000
FAX# (941) 6394851 Station ID: 038001521100
COLLIER Date Start: 03-Apr-07
BAYSHORE DR DRIVEWAY BOTANICAL GARDENS Date End: 05-Apr-07
SB ..---------.--
Sta rt :,~,:<."i:pl,':'O, Hour Totals ~NB Combined T atals
Time "(uc Mom! i Mor' n in Afternoon
12:00 0 0 1
12:15 0 0 1
12:30 0 0 2
12:45 0 0 12 0 2 '0 6 0 18
01:00 0 0 3
u",:i5 0 .~ I I 0 1
01:30 0 1 I 0 0
01:45 0 1 j 0 13 I 0 01 0 4 0 17
02:00 0 41 j 0 2 I
02:15 0 0: 0 o I
02:30 0 01 I 0 01
02:45 0 :: ! {) 6 \ 0 01 {; ... 0 8
.:
03:00 0 1 I 0 1 1 I
03:15 ,\," v 0 11 I 0 , I
03:30 0 01 4/ 0 01 1
03:45 \\~ 0 21 0 0 1 I 0 ~I 0 i
04:00 0 !4l A I 0 m I
04:'15. '\ 0 i ~ lJ I 0 1; , I '1
04:30 ("\,~ .~-r 0 I 0 LO,n p "I
04:45 '1'\ It 0 "Oi 0 51 0 0 0 L , 0 7
05:00 'th'~" 0 ) '~;C 0 0 :\ I t
\If
05:15 \-" "L '," 0 2 lv, 0 0 ;~i
05:30 ,y' ,~\ 0 'I a i ( I 0 l! I
05:45 \ ' .'. 0 o! 0 61 0 0 0 o i 0 6
06:00 '- ~' 0 01 I 0 01 1
\)5:15 0 01 I 0 o I i
06:30 . 0 01 I 0 01 o I
CH5:45 0 Oi 0 01 0 01 0 {) 0
07:00 0 ~I I 0 o I I
07:15 2 , 1 01 I
v' i
07:30 1 01 I 0 o I ... !
,)7'45 -,-- Oi 8 01 _4.. 01 5 v I 13 0
08:00 I ~'l ~l I 1/ 01 I
-1'\0."';: v, I , o I n
'.,: LJ~ I ~J 10 I
08:30 /Y g, J 01 b o 1 1
~t:45 " ' 12 01 _4_ . " , () 01 is 0
I VI
09:00 '~4 OJ 2 01 1
09:15 6 fl, 3 01 1
09:30 2 ~I 01 1 ~I - I
09:45 -4 1C 1 i ...- 0
v, VI ~,.,
10:00 4 1 1 ~I I
10:15 ~ v, () 0'
10:30 1 01 J 3 gl 01
10:45 3 D; 'Ii 2 " 17 0
\J v
11:00 5 01 I 1 ~I
,.-..- ...r t. 1
11.li.I C' , I
11:30 3 01 J 0 ~ I
1, ~ :45 10 (I' ~."j I' I 5 li ? 0 30 (l
Total 70 46 31 17 101 63
Percent 60.3% 39,7% 64.6% 35,4% 61.6% 38.4%
II" 413
FLORIDA TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING. INC,
8250 PASCAL DR.
PH# (941) 639 281 B. (800)-639-4851
FAX# (941) 639 4851
C2A.E,
03:00
03:15
03:30
03A5
04:00
04:'!5
04:30
04:45
05:00
05:15
05:30
05:45
06:00
06:15
06:30
GGA~
07:00
07:15
07:30
07A5
08:00
vU~15
08:30
()c:t.5
09:00
O~15
09:30
0945
10:00
H):16
10:30
:0'45
11 :00
"i is
11:30
11:45
Total
Percent
5
;>
31
43,7%
o
3
1
4
Q
1
1
o
o
o
o
[,i
40
56,3%
11
" 9 0
"
0
0
0
0 0 -
0
0
0
0 0 0
I 2,
-,
I , ! 0 I I
7 0 r, ,
I : .,1
I J..::'I
'I
0
C: ',)
0
{}
2
c (J 1
-
0
()
1
f:' (I I
0
0
3
f; (;
16
55.2%
2q
o
o
[.1
o
o
13
44,8%
Aaenda item ~Jo, '178
~ Mav 26,2009
152 of 1 59
Page 2
Site Code: 140132600000
Station 10: 038001521100
Date Start: 03-Apr-07
Date End: 05-Apr-07
o
o
o
()
o
o
(}
J.
:}
.:
L
I
3i
I
,
j
4 I
1
i
I
01
I
I
I
1 :
I
I
51
I
I
I
01
I
I
I
01
I
I
(J
~9
(!
()
o
4
o
7
t/
o
14
tf
o
o
I)
o
I]
o
1i
I
I
I
- I
~ i
I
I
t,
o
i
o!
I
~
.?
:)
I
0,
I
'I
8
G
~; j
i :~
o
53
53.0%
47
47.0%
Agenda Item No, 17B
May 26, 2009
FLORIDA TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING, INC. Page 153 of 159
8250 PASCAL DR. Page 3
PH# (941) 639 2818, (800)-639-4851 Site Code: 140132600000
FAX# (941) 639 4851 Station 10: 038001521100
COLLIER Date Start: 03-Apr-07
BAYSHORE DR DRIVEWAY BOTANICAL GARDENS Date End: 05-Apr-07
SB i8""~---Hour Totals . ----jH!W&
Start 05-Apr-07 Hour Totals Combined Totals
Time Thu Morning After(lQQD.. M flem Morning _AftlilI!!.Qon r n _Q.rJ Morning ,.Aftemoon
12:00 0 2 0 0
12;15 0 2 0 0
12:30 0 4 0 4
12:45 0 6 0 14 0 2 0 6 0 20
01:00 0 3 0 4
01:15 0 2 0 1
01:30 0 2 0 0
01:45 0 5 0 12 0 2 0 7 0 19
02:00 0 0 0 ~I
02:15 0 2 0
02:30 0 1 0
02:1,;5 0 6, 0 9 J (i 0 3 0 12
03:00 0 : I I 0 1j
((~~l(. 0 .... , 0 2 ,
03:30 0 OJ I 0 01 I
03~4;5 0 3i 0 91 0 , , () 4 i 0 "i3
04:00 0 t~tl1 I 0 01 '0
04:15, 0 . 0 r: I 0 . t) I
04:30 0 141'f 0 I 0 I
~~"..z.5 0 '-0 j 0 S 0 . 0 i 0 0 10
05:00 0 , i ' 0 01 _ I
05:15 0 o I 0 O!V
05:30 0 0 1 I 0 el oi
05:45 0 () .t () 0 -01 /) 0
06:00 0 01 I 0 01 I
06:15 0 01 I 0 01
I
06:30 0 ~I 01 0 ~I
Gv~45 1 UI 2 v, 2 01 3 0
07:00 0 01 I 0 01 J
G7:i5 1 01 I .. 01
07:30 , 1 01 I 0' 01
,
07:45 :J , 01 <I o! () 01 co , 5 0
08:00 i:q ..., 01 1 I 21 - 01 1
QS:i5 0 ", I 0 01 OJ
v,
08:30 ! 2 I 01 1 I 01 01 I
GINS () 0' ~~ 01 0 ,,' " o ; '7 0
l,J i
09:00 2 01 1 2 01 I
09:i5 2 OJ I 1 01 ,
09:30 4 ~I - I 2 01 1
09:45 !1 '" 8 UI 0 0, () o : 1 ;} 0
10:00 1 ?I I 0 61 I
10:15 , II I 0 (J ,
10:30 3 ~I 1 2 01 I
10:45 1 0, 0 Q ~, o . 8 0
~I '"
11:00 6 I 2 01 1
11:15 1 , , 01 1 0
11:30 2 ~I 1 ----1L 01
11:45 0 9 1 . 5 14 0
Total 33 54 17 21 50 75
Percent -~~--. 37.9% u62.1 % . ,_~I%.... 55.3% 40.0% 6.0 ,Qo/.o....
Grand 134 140 64 51 198 191
Total
Percent 48,9% 51.1% 55.7% 44.3% 50.9% 49,1%
ADT Not Calculated
~7 Jf
/\qenca item hlo, 178
May 26, 2009
FLORIDA TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING, INC, Page 154 of 159
8250 PASCAL DR. Page 1
PH# (941) 639 2818, (800)-639-4851 Site Code: 140130200000
FAX# (941) 639 4851 Station ID: 038002121100
Date Start: 03-Apr~07
Thomasson dr Driveway Date End: 05-Apr-07
--.-----..- - ._~~~--,._---
Start 03-Apr-07 NB Hour Totals SB Hour Totals Combined Totals
- Time .Tue Morning AfternQQ.Q .. Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon
12:00 0 12 'T 0 13T-- i-
12:15 0 7 , 0 14\
12:30 0 8 ~' i 0 16 I
12:45 0 7 0 ~41 ;:- 71 0 50 i 0 84
01:00 0 2 0 61
01 :15 0 15 0 ,2 I
01:30 0 9 ~ I 0 8 I I
01:45 0 31 0 ,,9, 0 31 0 29 , 0 58
02:00 0 JI I 0 11 I I
02:15 0 0 13 I I
02:30 0 I 0 10 I I
02:45 0 :.1 0 ::6 1 0 2 I 0 :~(; j 0 62
03:00 0 91 I 0 9 I
03:15 0 1 ! 0 2 I I
03:30 0 ~ I 0 7 I I
03:45 0 0 213 I 0 7 I 0 25 i 0 51
04:00 0 I 0 I S- II I If
04:15" 0 ~I 61 0 1 I I
-ill/to I e i
04:30 0 0 ,L~.I\D
04:45 0 ~L () 0 tl () 0 14
05:00 0 ~i^ ) 0 :l I
05:15 0 I {} 0 I C>
05:30 0 1'1 0 0 I
--.-,.
05:45 0 v 0 0: 0 6 0 [) I 0 0
06:00 0 0 I 0 0 I
06:15 0 0 0 .. I
06:30 0 0 01 0 0 I
06:45 0 0 0 i} 0 0 0 I 0 0
07:00 0 0 0 0 I
07:15 0 2 {} I
07:30 0 4 0 3 j
07:45 0 0 () " !) .: " .n b
, v ',,- F"d
08:00 0 0 10 0
08:\5 . :j tf 1(\ I 0
I - ,
08:30 10 f 0 101 0
oe:~;;, n 0 (! (\ [1 (1 0 ~ 0 ('
" v
09:00 'i 0 1 0
i;~;~1 ~1 J (I ^ u
v
09:30 0 0 0 0
08;~;~5 i 0 ~, (} 9 G 10 () 19 0
10:00 3 0 11 0
~O..15 P, 0 " 0
,0
10:30 7 0 11 0
~f'!:J::~, I (' "'!j; 0 ,3 (1 :;:l (1 75 v
" ~..../
11 :00 13 0 24 0
"1'15 i7 (I :~1 ()
11 :30 9 0 12 01
11:45 5 (,; 44 (\ (5 (i GJ 0 i\.i'l D
"
Total 78 127 123 152 201 279
Percent 38.0% 62,0% 44.7% 55,3% 41.9% 58,1%
20( 21S
Agenda item No, 17B
May 26, 2009
FLORIDA TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING. INC. Page 155 of 159
8250 PASCAL DR. Page 2
PH# (941) 639 2818. (800)-639-4851 Site Code: 140130200000
FfJ\XJI. (941) 6394851 Station 10: 038002121100
Date Start: 03-Apr-07
Thomasson dr Driveway Date End: 05-Apr-07
---,._----" .--. ..--- ~.._--_.~~ ".-.- . -.--..-..-. --,.
Start 04-Apr-07 NB SB Hour Totals Combined Totals
Time Wed Moming AftemQQfi., ,Momi Morning n _ M9ming, Afternoon
12:00 0 11 0 10
12:15 0 9 0 3
12:30 0 5 0 11
12:45 0 9 0 34 0 6 0 30 0 64-
01:00 0 3 0 9
01:15 0 14 0 14
01:30 0 10 0 13
01:45 0 8 0 35 0 13 0 49 0 84
02:00 0 2 0 5
02:15 0 7 0 5
02:30 0 3 0 5
02:45 0 7: 0 19 0 10 0 25 0 44
03:00 0 A~ I 0 7
02:;5 0 n ; fl I
I..> ~ I v .J
03:30 0 91 I 0 13 I
0345 0 2_1 (i 3S I 0 3: {I "': , 0 75
04:00 0 "5'11 0 -'-2--1 I~
04:15 0 fI' 0 ...,
1'lt\? \." . -~
04:30 0 6 ! 0 1 I ,...
.... .L~C" 0 01 0 0 -71 0 10 0 16
~''''''i;J
I 1 I
05:00 0 4'" 0 )i ,q
nt:;~"'~ 0 2 I 0 1 I 1
..,~..~
05:30 0 2J v I 0 e, I I
,:
DS~45 0 n, I) 81 0 -'o'i c 4 ) 0 12
06:00 0 ~i I 0 ~I
:je~';5 0 , 0 u'
06:30 0 ~I 91 0 1 I 7 )
.uf,:4 5 0 VI 0 d 0: 0 I) i6
07:00 0 01 I 0 ~I ,I
07:15 0 o! I 0 ,}
07:30 0 01 1 0 0
07:45 0 1')1 (! 01 0 " r. () 0
21 " v J,
08:00 to' I \ 0 1 I
' I
08:15 v 01 0 0 I
08:30 I 01 01 1 I 0 0 1
I
OB:4!i 4 01 , ,., ~ 0 0 I) 4 3
,.:.,l i
09:00 '0 01 1 '-e-:;'~ 0
09:;;:' () (J I I () 0
09:30 0 01 I 0 0 I
011:45 0 01 0 01 1 0 (I 0
10:00 2 g! I 2 0 1
10:15 2 I " 0
<.'
10:30 5 01 10 0 I
10:45 5 !'Ii . , -"'j"'t. 0 4:1 o I 57 0
,.. ..."
11 :00 6 ~ ! I 14 0 1
11 :15 7 16 0 I
11:30 7 01 01 8 0 '"
~ ~:~5 6 0: 20 7 0 45 VI 71 ()
Total 44 146 89 168 133 314
Percent 23.2% 76,8% 34.6% 65.4% 29.8% 70.2%
/qD 257
FLORIDA TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING, INC,
8250 PASCAL DR.
PH# (941) 639 2818, (800)-639-4851
FAX# (941) 639 4851
Thomasson dr Driveway
Start
Time
12:00
12:15
12:30
12:45
01:00
01:15
01:30
01:45
02:00
02:15
02:30
02:45
03:00
G3, ;5
03:30
08:30
08:45
09:00
09:1;:;
09:30
09:45
10:00
10:15
10:30
10:45
11:00
11:15
11 :30
11:45
Total
Percent
Grand
Total
Percent
05-Apr-07
Thu
Gj:4&
04:00
{14;iE-
04:30
r<4 ~45
05:00
05:15
05:30
i):;;.1S
06:00
06:15-
06:30
OGA~
07:00
07:15
07:30
07'(::,
08:00
~~:~5
(j
G
o
4
3
7
1
3
3
5
10
18
54
28,9%
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
133
71,1%
176 406
30,2% 69,8%
ADT Not Calculated
I i1l"
JOrl.
o
o
o
c)
o
o
(I
o
':}
4
14 0
36 0
f\aenda item No, 17B
- fv1ay 26, 2009
Page 156 of 159
Page 3
Site Code: 140130200000
Station ID: 038002121100
Date Start: 03-Apr-07
Date End: 05-Apr-07
28
Morn'n
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
NB Hour Totals
MornLQS....... Aftemoon Morning Afternoon
o 7
o 9
o 6
o 6
o 5
o 13
o 5
o 6
g ~I
o 12
o .3 I
o 31
o 2 i
o 9]
o 31
o ~-6"1I
o 1 1
o ! ~.III!
o --2.
o 4 ,"
o 2
o ,
o 01
o 41
o .. I
o 61
o 01
o 01
[) 01
o 0 I
!) O!
o 0 I
I _, _ I
.,) V!
! q 0 I
o
1\
'"
29
I
26 I
,
I
.J
II ,
I
I
.. "
11 1
,I
I
8
I
: 1
iJ
" i
8
10
9
29
90
35,~p- .
302
38,3%
o
()
'0,
o
o
o
4
4
1,
7
S8
n
V
o
o
o
Ii
o
(I
o
o
o
o
o
(t
o
o
o
12
9
3
14
9
10
12
6
11
6
4
1~ I
v.
12 I
4;
71
1 1 I,
2 -J \I
~l
-2 i ,f\
2\
t')t
2 i
81
OJ
1 ,
'I I
01
; I
01
"I
01
01
01
{I]
11
Oi
01
(I I
01
() I
01
o
~I
0'
o
166
n. 64,8%
486
o
-~)
61,7%
1YY
I V .
o
o
o
o
()
o
o
r.
"
lJ
-1
3~
56
Combined Totals
Morning Aftemoon
38
o 66
37
o 66
31
o 59
31
o 48
z,:t
11
o 22
",?v
6
o 14
,- ,
III .
I
!
o 21
"
~.
I)
"
v
o 0
B 2
()
L.4 D
o
92 0
144 299
32,5%,_ 67.5%
478 892
34.9% 65,1%
/
Collier County
A verage Daily Traffic (ADT) Counts
(Five Year History Listed Alphabetically)
Agenda Item No, 17B
May 26, 2009
Page 157 of 159
S A T
t n y
0 2006
a p
m ADT
t a e Location 2002 2003 2004 2005 Change
i I ADT ADT ADT ADT (Based on 05-06
Available
0 i Counts)
n e
s
613 H Q 111 th Ave North east of Vanderbilt Dr (CR 901) 8,493 8,383 9,292 '(,j,./?:,;';'.O 7,721
585 H Q 111 th Ave North west of Vanderbilt Dr (CR 901) 4,593 4,774 5,500 ' "1\' ;~;"';'O 4,402
665 A 29 ISR) north of Farm Worker's Villaqe 9,919 9,940 10,131 9,875 9,915 0.41%
591 A 29 (SR) north of SR 82 7,601 7,540 8,117 8,335 8,275 -0,72%
615 C A 29 (SR) north of US 41 (SR 90) (Tamiami Trail E.) 3,072 3,198 2,591 2,620
582 A 29 (SR) south of US 41 (SR 90) 3,940 3,679 3,419 3,177 3,316 4,38%
661 A 82 (SR) west of SR 29 11,624 11,144 11 ,225 11 ,531 13,846 20,08%
619 Q 846 IDevil's Garden Rd) east of SR 29 4,242 3,317 3,269 2,853 3,114 9,15%
553 H Q Airport Rd (CR 31) north of Davis Blvd (SR 84) 45,883 47,870 50,029 I;,":,' :i'f' 0 49,519
501 CCCC Q Airport Rd (CR 31) north of Golden Gate Pkwv, (CR 886) 50,748 43,412 42,784 """<',',0
693 Q Airport Rd (CR 31) north of North Road 52,148 55,416 53,860 54,560 54,203 -0,65%
599 CC Q Airport Rd (CR 31) north of Oranqe Blossom Dr 45,664 48,896 46,144 39,444 38,347 -2,78%
503 CCCC Q Airport Rd (CR 31) north of Pine Ridge Rd (CR 896) 44,288 49,634 46,179 "">"".,'0 40,698
543 H Q Airport Rd (CR 31) north of US 41 (SR 45) (Tamiami Trail) 27,572 27,919 29,607 '''''' . n 28,494
"',"',".'
659 Q Airport Rd (CR 31) north of Vanderbilt Beach Ext (CR 862) 34,986 35,742 36,331 31,088 29,500 -5,11%
552 Q Airport Rd (CR 31) south of Davis Blvd (SR 84) 36,031 37,000 37,895 36'9m -1,38%
533 C C/H C Q Airport Rd (CR 31) south of Golden Gate Pkwv (CR 886) 55,412 50,809 53,637 '" ""
554 H Q Airport Rd (CR 31) south of Immokalee Rd (CR 846) 31,899 32,518 33,601 ';;;:;"ik 26,829
502 HN Q Airport Rd (CR 31) south of Pine Ridqe Rd (CR 896) 49,877 46.331 46,970 'i','," 'ii;
717 S Bald Eaqle Dr (CR 953) north of Heathwood Dr 13,354 12,915 13,370 Discont. Discont.
700 S Bald Eaqle Dr (CR 953) north of Barfield Dr 9,250 7,105 8,505 Discont. Discont.
539 Q Bald Eaqle Dr (CR 953) north of Collier Blvd (SR 951) 11 ,1 73 11 ,388 13,233 Discont. Discont.
540 Q Bald Eaqle Dr (CR 953) south of Collier Blvd (SR 951) 11,314 10,978 11,805 Discont Discont.
622 Q Barfield Dr south of Collier Blvd (SR 951) 8.578 8,349 8.938 Discont. Discont.
701 S Barfield Dr east of Bald Eaale Dr ICR 953) 4,950 4,548 5,196 Discont Discont
621 Q Barfield Dr north of Collier Blvd (SR 951) 3,546 3,405 3,601 Discont Discont
718 S Barfield Dr north of San Marco Rd (CR 92) 9,166 9,122 8,480 Discont Discont
711 S Barfield Dr north of Winterberrv Dr 6,619 6,384 6,081 Discont Discont
713 S Barfield Dr south of Winterberrv Dr 3,802 3,941 4,267 Discont Discont.
521 Q Bayshore Dr north of Week Ave 16,352 ' 15,377 14,636 14,271 14,012 -1.82%
626 A Camp Keais Rd south of Immokalee Rd (CR 846) 3,089 3,267 3,027 3,854 3,783 -1,84%
660 A Capri Blvd west of Collier Blvd (SR 951) 5,135 4,250 4,276 4,780 4,585 -4,08%
610 Q Carson Rd north of Lake Trafford Rd (CR 890) 5,656 5,703 5,927 5,472 5,797 5,93%
618 A Chokoloskee Causeway south of Plantation Parkway 2,173 2,209 2,172 2,075 1,834 -11.61%
573 Q Collier Blvd (eR 951) north of Davis Blvd (SR 84) 45,4 75 46,582 53,866 56,180 57,314 2.02%
584 HC Q Collier Blvd (CR 951) north of Golden Gate Blvd 18,042 18,538 18,518 , 0
525 Q Collier Blvd (CR 951) north of Golden Gate Pkwv (CR 886) 26,518 27,409 29,570 31,943 32,040 0.30%
536 Q Collier Blvd (CR 951) north of Pine Ridae Rd (CR 896) 31,031 33,549 35,421 37,304 36,939 -0,98%
602 Q Collier Blvd (CR 951) north of Rattlesnake Ham Rd (CR 864) 30,288 31,626 33,926 38,709 39,767 2,73%
532 Q Collier Blvd (CR 951) north of US 41 (SR 90) (Tamiami Trail) 22.828 23,920 21,918 23,061 28,323
607 Q Collier Blvd (CR 951) south of Golden Gate Pkwy(CR 886) 22,415 23,232 25,815 29,160 30,060 3.09%
655 CC Q Collier Blvd (CR 951) south of Immokalee Rd (CR 846) 19,125 1 9,484 21 ,796 21,792 1.69%
657 Q Collier Blvd (CR 951) south of Lelv Cultural Blvd 25,016 26,284 29,365 32,477 32,739 0,81%
603 C Q Collier Blvd (CR 951) south of Rattlesnake Ham Rd (CR 864) 27,713 27,928 31,462 34,013 0.46%
557 cc Q Co!lier Blvd (CR 951) south of US 41 (SR 90) (Tamiami Trai!) 34,288 34,132 35,556 , 0
555 Q Collier Blvd (SR 951) east of Bald Eaqle Dr (CR 953) 18,995 18,914 20,627 Discont Discont
624 Q Collier Blvd (SR 951) north of San Marco Rd (CR 92) 17,721 16,656 18,348 Discont. Discont
708 S Collier Blvd (SR 951) north of Winterberry Dr 12,464 12,627 13,056 Discont. Discont.
627 Q Collier Blvd (SR 951) south of Capri Blvd (CR 952) 26,386 26,178 27,814 28,598 27,198 -4,89%
556 Q Collier Blvd (SR 951) south of Marco Bridge (Jolley Bridqe) 26,493 26,271 27,743 Discont. Discont.
716 S Collier Blvd (SR 951) south of San Marco Rd (CR 92) 17.335 17,951 18,885 Discont Discont
710 S Coliier Blvd (SR 951) south of Wlnterberry Dr i 0,8 i 8 ii, i 60 i i ,035 Discont Discont
623 Q Collier Blvd (SR 951) west of Bald Eaale Dr (CR 953) 22.664 21,281 23,519 Discont Dlscont.
Note: All 2005 zero entries are either construction or hurricane related anomalies.
All 2006 anomalies are due to construction.
Pages 3-8 of 15
February, 2007
.Agenda Item No, 17B
r\~av 26. 2009
Naples Botanical Garden 158 of 159
Thomasson Dr I Bayshore Dr 6/14/2007
.",. -+ " f"" -+- "- "\ t ". "" + 4'
Lane..Group\:C;.. ese' err; ..... EBB WBC . War WSR NBL .1\18T NBR--- SBLL, SBT; SaR
Lane Configurations "1 ... 4' r 'k "'l A '!I
II ,:
ideaJ Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 t900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length (ft) 0 150 0 200 0 0 300 300
Storage Lanes 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1
Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1,00
Frt 0.964 0.850 0.978 0.850
Fit Protected 0,950 O~980 0.999 0,950
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1796 0 0 1825 1583 0 1820 0 1770 1863 1583
FIt Permitted 0.950 0.980 0,999 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 1796 0 0 1825 1583 0 1820 0 1770 1863 1583
Headway Factor 1,00 1.00 1,00 100 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30
Link Distance. (ft) 556 750 691 245
Travel Time (s) 12.6 17.0 15.7 7.8
Volume (vph) 41 27 8 28 40 129 2 61 12 225 51 42
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Adj, Flow (vph) ,~5 29 9 30 43 140 2 66 13 245 55 46
Lane Group Flow (vph) 45 38 0 0 73 140 0 81 0 245 55 46
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Slop
Intersection Summary" .
Area Type: Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
Intersection Capacity Utilization 36.1 oi~ ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min) 15
Baseline
Wilson Miller, Inc.
Ey,islin9 Conditions Report
Page 1
Naples Botanical Garden
Thomasson Dr / Bayshore Dr
"I-
[ana'Sroijpr~rnT;0i,~1;'Yfq.;i~"'~~Ef3E:fi:~.
Lane Configurations ~
Id~al Flow (vphpl) 1900,
Storage Length (ft) 0
Stc>rag~ Lclne~.. 0
Turning Speed (mph) 15
Lane Uti!. FaCtor 1,00
Frt
Fit Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Fit Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Headway F~"ct~r
Link Speed (mph)
Llfik Distance(ft)
Travel Time (s)
Volume {vph)
Peak Hour Factor
Adj; Flow (\i'ph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Sign Control
0.950
1770
0.950
1770
1.00
38
0.92
41'
41
-+ ~ ., <If- '- '" t ~
"EaT~};~ EaSt:;;; WB8f'.WBb;',/WBRli%7NI38;ZF NBr';;;NBaZ~Esa~;i~;.'ssr;';c saR
~ +.1; r' .. ~,., r'i
1900 190q 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900. 190.0: 1900 1900 1900
150 0 200 0 0 300 300
1 0 1 0' 01 1
9 15 9 15 9 15 9
1.00 1,00 1.00 '.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
0.970 0.850 0.973 0.850
0.999 0.950
o 1811 0 1770 1863 1583
0,999 0.950
1583 0 1811 0 1770 1863 1583
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
30 30
691' 345
15.7 7.8
81 20 225 75
0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
88 22 245 82
112 0 245 82
Stop Stop
1807
1807
1.00.
30
556
12.6
26
0.92
28
35
Stop
0 0
0 0
1.00 1.00
6
0.92
7
o
0:976
1818
0.976
1818
1,00
30
750
17.0
37
0.92
40
o
0.92
42
82
Stop
Agenda Item No, 17B
May 26, 2009
Page 159 of 159
8/8/2007
\.
+
../
1583
39
129
0.92
140
140
2
0.92
2
o
39
0.92
42
42
Unslgnalized
Intersection Capacity Utilization 366%
Analysis Period (min) 15
leu Levei 01 Service A
Baseline
Wilson Miller, Inc.
Revised Conditions Repor1
Page 1