The URL can be used to link to this page

CCPC Agenda 06/06/2019 Collier County Planning Commission Page 1 Printed 5/29/2019 COLLIER COUNTY Collier County Planning Commission AGENDA Board of County Commission Chambers Collier County Government Center 3299 Tamiami Trail East, 3rd Floor Naples, FL 34112 June 6, 2019 9: 00 AM Mark Strain - Chairman Karen Homiak - Vice-Chair Edwin Fryer - Secretary Patrick Dearborn Karl Fry Stan Chrzanowski, Environmental Joseph Schmitt, Environmental Thomas Eastman, Collier County School Board Note: Individual speakers will be limited to 5 minutes on any item. Individuals selected t o speak on behalf of an organization or group are encouraged and may be allotted 10 minutes to speak on an item if so recognized by the chairman. Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the CCPC agenda packets must submit said material a minimum of 10 days prior to the respective public hearing. In any case, written materials intended to be considered by the CCPC shall be submitted to the appropriate county staff a minimum of seven days prior to the public hearing. All material used in presentations before the CCPC will become a permanent part of the record and will be available for presentation to the Board of County Commissioners if applicable. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the CCPC will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto, and therefore may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. June 2019 Collier County Planning Commission Page 2 Printed 5/29/2019 1. Pledge of Allegiance 2. Roll Call by Secretary 3. Addenda to the Agenda 4. Planning Commission Absences 5. Approval of Minutes 6. BCC Report - Recaps 7. Chairman's Report 8. Consent Agenda 9. Public Hearings A. Advertised 1. CU-PL20170002361: A Resolution of the Board of Zoning Appeals of Collier County, Florida providing for the establishment of an asphalt and concrete batch- making plant in the Agricultural (A) zoning district within the Rural Fringe Mixed Use Overlay-Receiving Lands pursuant to Section 2.03.08 A.2.a.(3)(c)(viii) of the Collier County Land Development Code, for 5.16± acres of a 7.3± acre parcel located approximately one half mile north of Tamiami Trail East, at the end of Auto Village Road, in Section 18, Township 51 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida, and providing an effective date. [Coordinator: Gil Martinez, Principal Planner] 2. PL20180002619: An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida amending Ordinance No. 95-74, the Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club Planned Unit Development; by revising the master plan to reduce the preserve tract by 2.90 acres and add 2.90 acres as a recreation area for the relocation of the tennis center within Tract A, just north of Naples Heritage Drive; and providing an effective date. The subject property, consisting of 558± acres, is located south of Davis Boulevard and west of Collier Boulevard in Sections 3, 4, 9 And 10, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: Gil Martinez, Principal Planner. ] June 2019 Collier County Planning Commission Page 3 Printed 5/29/2019 3. PL20180000261/CPSP-18-2: 9 ordinance amendments of Ordinance 89-05, as amended, the Collier County Growth Management Plan of the unincorporated area of Collier County Florida, relating to the Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy. The following elements are changed or created with a separate ordinance for each: Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element and the Golden Gate Area Future Land Use Map and Map Series; Golden Gate City Sub-Element of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element; Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element; Rural Estates Sub-Element of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element; Conservation and Coastal Management Element; Future Land Use Element And Future Land Use Map And Map Series; the Stormwater Management Sub-Element of the Public Facilities Element; the Solid Waste Sub- Element of the Public Facilities Element; and the Transportation Element. [Coordinator: Kris VanLengen, AICP, Project Manager] B. Noticed 10. New Business 11. Old Business 12. Public Comment 13. Adjourn 06/06/2019 COLLIER COUNTY Collier County Planning Commission Item Number: 9.A.1 Item Summary: CU-PL20170002361: A Resolution of the Board of Zoning Appeals of Collier County, Florida providing for the establishment of an asphalt and concrete batch -making plant in the Agricultural (A) zoning district within the Rural Fringe Mixed Use Overlay-Receiving Lands pursuant to Section 2.03.08 A.2.a.(3)(c)(viii) of the Collier County Land Development Code, for 5.16± acres of a 7.3± acre parcel located approximately one half mile north of Tamiami Trail East, at the end of Auto Village Road, in Section 18, Township 51 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida, and providing an effective date. [Coordinator: Gil Martinez, Principal Planner] Meeting Date: 06/06/2019 Prepared by: Title: – Zoning Name: Gilbert Martinez 05/14/2019 10:21 AM Submitted by: Title: Division Director - Planning and Zoning – Zoning Name: Michael Bosi 05/14/2019 10:21 AM Approved By: Review: Zoning Ray Bellows Review Item Completed 05/14/2019 11:32 AM Growth Management Operations & Regulatory Management Judy Puig Review item Completed 05/15/2019 2:20 PM Zoning Michael Bosi Review item Completed 05/15/2019 4:34 PM Zoning Camden Smith Review Item Completed 05/20/2019 4:27 PM Growth Management Operations & Regulatory Management Donna Guitard Review Item Completed 05/21/2019 2:42 PM Growth Management Department James C French Review Item Completed 05/21/2019 2:49 PM Zoning Michael Bosi Review Item Completed 05/22/2019 7:59 AM Planning Commission Mark Strain Meeting Pending 06/06/2019 9:00 AM 9.A.1 Packet Pg. 4 CU-PL20170002361, EAGLE READY MIX COLLIER BATCH PLANT June 6, 2019 Page 1 of 10 STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: ZONING DIVISION – ZONING SERVICES SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING DATE: JUNE 6, 2019 SUBJECT: CU-PL20170002361; EAGLE READY MIX COLLIER BATCH PLANT ______________________________________________________________________________ PROPERTY OWNER/AGENT: Owner: Smyrna Ready Mix Concrete. LLC Agent: Daniel DeLisi, AICP 16576 Gator Rd. DeLisi, Inc. Fort Myers, FL 33912 15598 Bent Creek Rd. Wellington FL 33414 REQUESTED ACTION: To have the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) consider an application for a Conditional Use to allow for an asphalt and concrete batch-making plant use on lands zoned Agricultural within the Rural Fringe Mixed-Use District – Receiving Lands Overlay (A- RFMUO-Receiving Lands) pursuant to Section 2.03.08.A.2.a.(3)(c)(viii) of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC). It is important to note that this conditional use is being sought for the northern two thirds of this parcel which is zoned A-RFMUO-Receiving Lands. The southern one third of this parcel is zoned Industrial (I) which allows for the asphalt and concrete batch-making plant as a permitted use pursuant to LDC Section 2.03.04(A)(1)(a)(24). (See zoning map on page 4 and aerial on page 5). GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property is for 5.16+/- acres of a 7.3+/- acre parcel located north of Tamiami Trail East, approximately 1000 feet west of Basik Drive, in Section 18, Township 51 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida. (See location map on page 4) 9.A.1.a Packet Pg. 5 Attachment: Eagle Ready Staff Report (8988 : Eagle Ready Mix Collier Batch) CU-PL20170002361, EAGLE READY MIX COLLIER BATCH PLANT June 6, 2019 Page 2 of 10 PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The petitioner seeks a Conditional Use for an asphalt and concrete batch-making plant on approximately 5.16+/- acres of a 7.3+/- acre parcel. The Smyrna Ready Mix Trail Plant will have four areas consisting of material testing and storage, material processing and building, equipment parking, and water management. The master concept site plan (see page 3) provides ingress/egress from the southeast corner of the property, buffering, and water management areas. Intentionally blank 9.A.1.a Packet Pg. 6 Attachment: Eagle Ready Staff Report (8988 : Eagle Ready Mix Collier Batch) CU-PL20170002361, EAGLE READY MIX COLLIER BATCH PLANT June 6, 2019 Page 3 of 10 9.A.1.a Packet Pg. 7 Attachment: Eagle Ready Staff Report (8988 : Eagle Ready Mix Collier Batch) CU-PL20170002361, EAGLE READY MIX COLLIER BATCH PLANT June 6, 2019 Page 4 of 10 9.A.1.aPacket Pg. 8Attachment: Eagle Ready Staff Report (8988 : Eagle Ready Mix Collier Batch) CU-PL20170002361, EAGLE READY MIX COLLIER BATCH PLANT June 6, 2019 Page 5 of 10 SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: This section of the staff report identifies the land uses and zoning classifications for properties surrounding the boundaries of the entire subject property, which is undeveloped and zoned Agricultural within the Rural Fringe Mixed-Use District – Receiving Lands Overlay (A- RFMUO-Receiving Lands) and Industrial (I) district. North: Developed with a quarry pit approved via Permit#901220-1, with a current zoning designation of Agricultural (A) zoning district with a Rural Fringe Mixed-Use – Receiving Lands overlay district (A-RFMUO-Receiving Lands) East: Developed with a farming business, with a current zoning designation of Agricultural (A) zoning district with a Rural Fringe Mixed-Use – Receiving Lands overlay district (A-RFMUO-Receiving Lands) and Industrial (I) located to the south. South: Developed open storage and auto recycling, with a current zoning designation of Industrial (I). West: Undeveloped land, with a current zoning designation of Agricultural (A) zoning district with a Rural Fringe Mixed-Use – Receiving Lands overlay district (A-RFMUO- Receiving Lands) Collier County Appraiser N 9.A.1.a Packet Pg. 9 Attachment: Eagle Ready Staff Report (8988 : Eagle Ready Mix Collier Batch) CU-PL20170002361, EAGLE READY MIX COLLIER BATCH PLANT June 6, 2019 Page 6 of 10 GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY: Comprehensive Planning staff has reviewed this request and offered the following comments: Future Land Use Element (FLUE): The southern one third of the subject property is designated Rural Industrial District and zoned I, Industrial District, and the northern two thirds of the subject property is designated Rural Fringe Mixed Use District (RFMUD) Receiving Lands and zoned A, Agricultural District with Rural Fringe Mixed Use Receiving Lands Overlay and all of the property is designated within the Coastal High Hazard Area (CHHA) as shown on the Future Land Use Map and in the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). Based on analysis, the proposed conditional use is consistent with the FLUE of the GMP. (See Attachment A) Transportation Element: The project is consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan, which states, “The County Commission shall review all rezone petitions, SRA designation applications, conditional use petitions, and proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) affecting the overall countywide density or intensity of permissible development, with consideration of their impact on the overall County transportation system, and shall not approve any petition or application that would directly access a deficient roadway segment as identified in the current AUIR or if it impacts an adjacent roadway segment that is deficient as identified in the current AUIR, or which significantly impacts a roadway segment or adjacent roadway segment that is currently operating and/or is projected to operate below an adopted Level of Service Standard within the five year AUIR planning period, unless specific mitigating stipulations are also approved. A petition or application has significant impacts if the traffic impact statement reveals that any of the following occur: a. For links (roadway segments) directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; b. For links adjacent to links directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; and c. For all other links the project traffic is considered to be significant up to the point where it is equal to or exceeds 3% of the adopted LOS standard service volume. Mitigating stipulations shall be based upon a mitigation plan prepared by the applicant and submitted as part of the traffic impact statement that addresses the project’s significant impacts on all roadways.” According to the TIS provided with this petition the proposed Concrete Batch Plant development will generate a projected total of +/- 8 PM peak hour, 2-way weekday trips for the proposed facility on the adjacent local roadway, Tamiami Trail East (US 41). Based on the then applicable 2016, as well as the 2017 and 2018 AUIR the adjacent roadway network has sufficient capacity to accommodate the proposed rezone within the 5-year planning period. Therefore, the subject Conditional Use can be found consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan. Operational impacts will be addressed at time of first development order (SDP or Plat). 9.A.1.a Packet Pg. 10 Attachment: Eagle Ready Staff Report (8988 : Eagle Ready Mix Collier Batch) CU-PL20170002361, EAGLE READY MIX COLLIER BATCH PLANT June 6, 2019 Page 7 of 10 Furthermore, the roadway infrastructure is sufficient to serve the proposed project, as noted in the Transportation Element consistency review. Operational impacts will be addressed at time of first development order (SDP or Plat), at which time a new TIS will be required to demonstrate turning movements for all site access points. Finally, the project’s development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals, including but not limited to any plats and or site development plans, are sought. The roadway infrastructure has sufficient capacity to serve the proposed project at this time. As such, Transportation Division staff has reviewed the petition request, the CU document and Master Plan for right-of-way and access issues and is recommending approval. Conservation & Coastal Management Element (CCME): Environmental Planning Section staff reviewed the petition. The subject property does not have a preserve requirement. The proposal is consistent with the CCME. Environmental Review: Environmental Planning staff has reviewed this petition. The subject property does not have a preserve requirement as the subject property is dominated by invasive exotic plans and does not meet the 25 percent coverage of native vegetation (LDC 3.05.07(A)(1)). This property is located within the 660-foot Buffer Zone of Bald Eagle Nest CO-037. External work during Nesting Season (October 1 – May 15) requires the applicant to follow U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Bald Eagle Management Guidelines. A USFWS permit is needed for activities with potential to disturb nesting bald eagles, or to remove or “take” a bald eagle nest. Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) review is required since the property is located within the Buffer Zone of Bald Eagle Nest CO-037 Stormwater Review: No adverse water quality impacts or flooding to other properties or County drainage systems are anticipated. This facilities stormwater management system will be regulated by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) National Pollution Discharge Elimination Program (NPDES) and Industrial Wastewater Program. The FDEP regulatory oversite activities will include compliance inspections, monitoring and reporting. This facilities stormwater management system will also be reviewed by Collier County at time of site development. STAFF ANALYSIS: When considering any Conditional Use recommendation can be offered to the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA), the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) must make findings that: 1) approval of the Conditional Use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not adversely affect other property of uses in the same district of neighborhood; and 2) all specific requirements for the individual Conditional Use will be met; and 3) satisfactory provisions have been made concerning the following matters, where applicable: 1. Section 2.03.08.A.2.a(3)(c)(viii), of the LDC permits conditional uses in the Agricultural (A) zoning district with a Rural Fringe Mixed-Use – Receiving Lands overlay district (A-RFMUO-Receiving Lands). 9.A.1.a Packet Pg. 11 Attachment: Eagle Ready Staff Report (8988 : Eagle Ready Mix Collier Batch) CU-PL20170002361, EAGLE READY MIX COLLIER BATCH PLANT June 6, 2019 Page 8 of 10 Regarding the northern two thirds of the subject property, the requested use for an asphalt and concrete batch-making plant is allowed as conditional uses in the A-RFMUO-Receiving Lands district, subject to the standards and procedures established in section 10.08.00, conditional uses procedures, of the LDC. Furthermore, the southern one third of the subject property is zoned Industrial (I) district that allows for the asphalt and concrete batch-making plant as a permitted use. 2. Consistency with the Land Development Code (LDC) and the Growth Management Plan (GMP). This request is consistent with the GMP and, with the conditions proposed by staff, this project will be in compliance with the applicable provisions of the Land Development Code (LDC). 3. Ingress and egress to the property and proposed structures thereon, with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe. Ingress and egress to the subject property would be limited to Tamiami Trail East (US 41). The TIS submitted by the applicant indicates that the adjacent roadway network has sufficient capacity to accommodate this project within the 5-year planning period. This project will not adversely impact the surrounding roadway network. The subject property has access to US 41 through the industrial access road, Auto Village Road, leading to US 41. Use of Auto Village Road will promote a safe environment for the truck traffic, avoiding the intermingling with non-industrial uses or pedestrian activity. At the access to US 41 are striped turn lanes allowing for safe ingress and egress and ease of flow of traffic. 4. The effect the Conditional Use would have on neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor effects. The subject site is currently zoned Agricultural (A) zoning district with a Rural Fringe Mixed-Use – Receiving Lands overlay district (A-RFMUO-Receiving Lands) and Industrial (I) district. A quarry pit is developed to the north of the subject property and to the east is developed with a farming business. Undeveloped lands are adjacent to the west. To the south is developed with an auto recycling and outdoor storage. The asphalt and concrete batch- making plant will be isolated far from properties that would pose any negative compatibility issues. The master concept plan has been designed to locate the building and storage areas to the south of the property adjacent to the existing auto recycling and open storage business adjacent to the south. As such, the proposed use should have minimal impact on neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor effects. 5. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district. If the proposed Conditions of Approval are adopted, the proposed asphalt and concrete batch- making plant (SIC 3531) can be found compatible with adjacent properties and other properties in the immediate area. 9.A.1.a Packet Pg. 12 Attachment: Eagle Ready Staff Report (8988 : Eagle Ready Mix Collier Batch) CU-PL20170002361, EAGLE READY MIX COLLIER BATCH PLANT June 6, 2019 Page 9 of 10 Based on the above findings, this conditional use should, with stipulations as outlined in this staff report be recommended for approval. ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL (EAC) RECOMMENDATION: Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) Recommendation: Environmental Planning Staff has reviewed this petition. Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) review is required since the subject property is within the 660-foot Buffer Zone of Bald Eagle Nest CO-037. There is no preserve requirement. NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM): The applicant conducted a duly noticed and advertised NIM on February 27, 2019 at Rookery Bay Environmental Learning Center, located at 300 Tower Road. The meeting commenced at approximately 5:30 p.m. Daniel DeLisi, the agent, conducted the meeting with introductions of the consultant team and staff, and an overview of the conditional use application. The agent explained the property location, zoning, property access, and the proposed use. Following the agent’s presentation, the meeting was opened to attendees to make comments and ask the consultant team questions regarding the proposed batch plant. Other items of concerns discussed were noise protection, hours of operation, and a provision of a sound barrier wall. No commitments were made. A copy of the summary, sign-in sheet, and site plan are included in the NIM Materials in Attachment B. COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The County Attorney’s Office reviewed the staff report on??? RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) approve Petition CU- PL20170002361 to the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA), subject to the following conditions: 1. The Eagle Ready Mix Collier Batch Plant Conditional Use shall be limited to that which is depicted on the “Smyrna Ready Mix East Trail Plant – Master Concept Plan – Revised 3-22-2019,” prepared by J.R. Evans Engineering, P.A. 2. The developer shall provide an 8-foot berm/wall combination extending from the southeast corner of the subject property north a minimum of 620 feet along the eastern property line. The wall shall be constructed from concrete block. Attachments: A) FLUE Consistency Review dated 11-8-2018 B) NIM Materials C) Application/Backup Materials 9.A.1.a Packet Pg. 13 Attachment: Eagle Ready Staff Report (8988 : Eagle Ready Mix Collier Batch) GIL MARTINEZ, PRINCIPAL PLANNER GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT REVIEWED BY: 4ru MICHAEL BOSI, AICP, DIRECTOR GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT APPROVED BY: FRENCH, DEPUTY DEPARTMENT HEAD GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT CU.PL2Ol70002361, EAGLE READY MIX COLLIER BATCH PLANT June 6,2019 Sr rr^/T DATE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT Page 10 of 10 9.A.1.a Packet Pg. 14 Attachment: Eagle Ready Staff Report (8988 : Eagle Ready Mix Collier Batch) 9.A.1.b Packet Pg. 15 Attachment: Resolution - 052319(1) (8988 : Eagle Ready Mix Collier Batch) 9.A.1.b Packet Pg. 16 Attachment: Resolution - 052319(1) (8988 : Eagle Ready Mix Collier Batch) 9.A.1.bPacket Pg. 17Attachment: Resolution - 052319(1) (8988 : Eagle Ready Mix Collier Batch) 9.A.1.b Packet Pg. 18 Attachment: Resolution - 052319(1) (8988 : Eagle Ready Mix Collier Batch) 9.A.1.b Packet Pg. 19 Attachment: Resolution - 052319(1) (8988 : Eagle Ready Mix Collier Batch) Zoning Division ● 2800 North Horseshoe Drive ● Naples, FL 34104 ● 239-252-2400 Page 1 of 3 Growth Management Department Zoning Division, Comprehensive Planning Section Memorandum To: Gil Martinez, Principal Planner, Zoning Services Section From: Sue Faulkner, Principal Planner, Comprehensive Planning Section Date: November 8, 2018 Subject: Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Consistency Review PETITION NUMBER: PL20170002361 PETITION NAME: Eagle (Smyrna) Ready Mix Collier Batch Plant – CU – Review 4 REQUEST: To obtain a Conditional Use (CU) for a ±7.3-acre site that is zoned Industrial District in the southern portion and Agricultural District, Rural Fringe Mixed Use District – Receiving Lands in the northern portion to allow for an asphalt and concrete batch plant (SIC 3531). Submittal 2 included a copy of the “correct” ‘Smyrna Ready Mix East Trail Plant Master Concept Plan’ for the project to address Review 1 comments. Submittal 3 revised the Master Concept Plan, Warranty, and Easement documents in response to review comments. Submittal 4 revised the Master Concept Plan and the Legal Description. LOCATION: The subject site is located approximately 4.5 miles to the east of the intersection of Collier Blvd. (CR 951) and Tamiami Trail East (US 41), and approximately ¼ mile directly north of Cemex Construction, which is northwest of the intersection of Tamiami Trail East and Auto Village Road, in Section 18, Township 51 South, Range 27 East. COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING COMMENTS: The southern one third of the subject property is designated Rural Industrial District and zoned I, Industrial District, and the northern two thirds of the subject property is designated Rural Fringe Mixed Use District (RFMUD) Receiving Lands and zoned A, Agricultural District with Rural Fringe Mixed Use Receiving Lands Overlay and all of the property is designated within the Coastal High Hazard Area (CHHA) as shown on the Future Land Use Map and in the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). The FLUE states in relevant part: The Rural Industrial District is intended for industrial type uses... “Besides basic Industrial uses, limited commercial uses are permitted.” In the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC), Section 2.03.04 Industrial Zoning Districts, A. Industrial District, 1 (c) Conditional uses (26) states: Any other industrial use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted uses and consistent with the purpose and intent statement of the district. Although the use ‘asphalt and concrete batch-making plant’ (SIC 3531) is not specifically listed in the LDC 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 20 Attachment: FLUE Consistency Review Dated 11-8-2018 (8988 : Eagle Ready Mix Collier Batch) Zoning Division ● 2800 North Horseshoe Drive ● Naples, FL 34104 ● 239-252-2400 Page 2 of 3 in the Industrial District, Cemex Construction (located just south of the subject property) operates the same identical use. The FLUE states, “The Rural Fringe Mixed Use District provides a transition between the Urban and Estates Designated lands and between the Urban and Agricultural/Rural and Conservation designated lands farther to the east. The Rural Fringe Mixed Use District employs a balanced approach, including both regulations and incentives, to protect natural resources and private property rights, providing for large areas of open space, and allowing, in designated areas, appropriate types, density and intensity of development. The Rural Fringe Mixed Use District allows for a mixture of urban and rural levels of service, including limited extension of central water and sewer, schools, recreational facilities, commercial uses and essential services deemed necessary to serve the residents of the District.” Receiving Lands are those lands within the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District that have been identified as being most appropriate for development and to which residential development units may be transferred from areas designated as Sending Lands. Based on the evaluation of available data, these lands have a lesser degree of environmental or listed species habitat value than areas designated as Sending and generally have been disturbed through development, or previous or existing agricultural operations. The proposed use is specifically allowed as item “t”. The proposed use can be found in the LDC Section 2.03.08 Rural Fringe Zoning Districts, A. Rural Fringe Mixed-Use District, (2) RFMU receiving lands, (c) Conditional uses, viii. It states, “In RFMU receiving lands other than those within the North Belle Meade Overlay, asphalt and concrete batch-making plants.” Certain applicable Future Land Use Element (FLUE) policies are shown below in italics followed by staff analysis in bold text. FLUE Policy 5.6 (shown below in italics) followed by staff analysis in [bracketed bold text]. New developments shall be compatible with, and complementary to, the surrounding land uses, as set forth in the Land Development Code (Ordinance 04-41, adopted June 22, 2004 and effective October 18, 2004, as amended). [Comprehensive Planning staff leaves this determination to Zoning staff as part of their review of the petition.] Policy 7.1: The County shall encourage developers and property owners to connect their properties to fronting collector and arterial roads, except where no such connection can be made without violating intersection spacing requirements of the Land Development Code. [The subject property (as shown on the Concept Master Plan) does not front on any collector or arterial roadways.] Policy 7.2: The County shall encourage internal accesses or loop roads in an effort to help reduce vehicle congestion on nearby collector and arterial roads and minimize the need for traffic signals. [The site is proposed as a single development project. No loop road (drive) or internal access is shown on the Master Concept Plan.] Policy 7.3: All new and existing developments shall be encouraged to connect their local streets and/or interconnection points with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless of land use type. The interconnection of local streets between developments is also addressed in Policy 9.3 of the Transportation Element. [The Master Concept Plan shows the subject site has little opportunity for interconnections. The site is bordered on the north, south, west and part of the east by undeveloped land zoned Agricultural with RFMU Receiving Lands Overlay and one existing single-family residence (which staff acknowledges would provide little meaningful benefit to connect with) on the top half of the northeast boundary.] 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 21 Attachment: FLUE Consistency Review Dated 11-8-2018 (8988 : Eagle Ready Mix Collier Batch) Zoning Division ● 2800 North Horseshoe Drive ● Naples, FL 34104 ● 239-252-2400 Page 3 of 3 Policy 7.4: The County shall encourage new developments to provide walkable communities with a blend of densities, common open spaces, civic facilities and a range of housing prices and types. [Mostly not applicable, given that this is an industrial development – not a residential development. There is no sidewalk shown on the Master Concept Plan. Since no sidewalk deviation was requested for this project, the project will need to comply with the LDC requirements for provision of sidewalks and will be addressed at the time of the site development plan.] CONCLUSION Based on the above analysis, staff finds the subject petition consistent with the Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan. PETITION ON CITYVIEW cc: Michael Bosi, AICP, Director, Zoning Division David Weeks, AICP, Growth Management Manager, Zoning Division, Comprehensive Planning Section Raymond V. Bellows, Manager, Zoning Division, Zoning Services Section CU-PL2017-2361 Eagle (Smyrna) Ready Mix Collier Batch Plant R4.docx 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 22 Attachment: FLUE Consistency Review Dated 11-8-2018 (8988 : Eagle Ready Mix Collier Batch) 9.A.1.dPacket Pg. 23Attachment: NIM MATERIALS (8988 : Eagle Ready Mix Collier Batch) 9.A.1.dPacket Pg. 24Attachment: NIM MATERIALS (8988 : Eagle Ready Mix Collier Batch) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 3/17/2017 Page 1 of 14 APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC HEARING FOR: CONDITIONAL USE LDC Section 10.08.00 & Code of Laws section 2-83 – 2-90 Chapter 3 C.1 of the Administrative Code PETITION NO (PL) PROJECT NAME DATE PROCESSED A CONDITIONAL USE TO BE HEARD BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS A MINOR CONDITIONAL USE TO BE HEARD BY THE OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Name of Applicant(s): ___________________________________________________________ Address: ____________________________City: _____________ State: ________ ZIP: _______ Telephone: ____________________ Cell: _____________________ Fax: ___________________ E-Mail Address: ________________________________________________________________ Name of Agent: ________________________________________________________________ Firm: _________________________________________________________________________ Address: ____________________________City: _____________ State: ________ ZIP: _______ Telephone: ____________________ Cell: _____________________ Fax: __________________ E-Mail Address: ________________________________________________________________ BE AWARE THAT COLLIER COUNTY HAS LOBBYIST REGULATIONS. GUIDE YOURSELF ACCORDINGLY AND ENSURE THAT YOU ARE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THESE REGULATIONS. To be completed by staff 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 25 Attachment: Application / Backup Materials (8988 : Eagle Ready Mix Collier Batch) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 3/17/2017 Page 2 of 14 DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST INFORMATION Please complete the following, use additional sheets if necessary. a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest: Name and Address % of Ownership b. If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each: Name and Address % of Ownership c. If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest: Name and Address % of Ownership d. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and/or limited partners: Name and Address % of Ownership 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 26 Attachment: Application / Backup Materials (8988 : Eagle Ready Mix Collier Batch) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 3/17/2017 Page 3 of 14 e. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners: Name and Address % of Ownership Date of Contract: ___________ f. If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or officers, if a corporation, partnership, or trust: Name and Address g. Date subject property acquired _______________ Leased: Term of lease ____________ years /months If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following: Date of option: _________________________ Date option terminates: __________________, or Anticipated closing date: ________________ h. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 27 Attachment: Application / Backup Materials (8988 : Eagle Ready Mix Collier Batch) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 3/17/2017 Page 4 of 14 ASSOCIATIONS Complete the following for all registered Association(s) that could be affected by this petition. Provide additional sheets if necessary. Information can be found on the Board of County Commissioner’s website at http://www.colliergov.net/Index.aspx?page=774. Name of Homeowner Association: _________________________________________________ Mailing Address: ____________________________ City: _________ State: ______ ZIP: ______ Name of Homeowner Association: _________________________________________________ Mailing Address: ____________________________ City: _________ State: ______ ZIP: ______ Name of Homeowner Association: _________________________________________________ Mailing Address: ____________________________ City: _________ State: ______ ZIP: ______ Name of Homeowner Association: _________________________________________________ Mailing Address: ____________________________ City: _________ State: ______ ZIP: ______ Name of Homeowner Association: _________________________________________________ Mailing Address: ____________________________ City: _________ State: ______ ZIP: ______ PROPERTY INFORMATION On separate page, provide a detailed legal description of the property covered by the application:  If the request involves changes to more than one zoning district, the applicant shall include separate legal description for property involved in each district;  The applicant shall submit 4 copies of a recent survey (completed within the last six months, maximum 1" to 400' scale), if required to do so at the pre-application meeting; and  The applicant is responsible for supplying the correct legal description. If questions arise concerning the legal description, an engineer's certification or sealed survey may be required. Property I.D. Number: ____________________________ Plat Book: _______ Page #: _______ Section/Township/Range: _______ /_______ /_______ Subdivision: __________________________________________Lot: ________ Block: ________ Metes & Bounds Description: _____________________________________________________ Size of Property: _____ft. X ______ ft. = _______ Total Sq. Ft. Acres: _____________ Address/ General Location of Subject Property: ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 28 Attachment: Application / Backup Materials (8988 : Eagle Ready Mix Collier Batch) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 3/17/2017 Page 5 of 14 ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE Zoning Land Use N S E W If the owner of the subject property owns contiguous property please provide a detailed legal description of the entire contiguous property: (If space is inadequate, attach on a separate page) Section/Township/Range: / / Lot: Block: Subdivision: __________________________________________ Plat Book: Page #: Property I.D. Number: ____________________________ Metes & Bounds Description: ________________________________________________ CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST DETAIL Type of Conditional Use: This application is requesting a conditional use as allowed, pursuant to LDC section 2.03.00, of the _______________________ zoning district for _______________________ (type of use). Present Use of the Property: __________________________________________ 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 29 Attachment: Application / Backup Materials (8988 : Eagle Ready Mix Collier Batch) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 3/17/2017 Page 6 of 14 EVALUATION CRITERIA Pursuant to LDC section 10.08.00 and Chapter 3 C.1 of the Administrative Code, staff’s recommendation to the reviewing body shall be based upon a finding that the granting of the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and that the specific requirements governing the individual conditional use, if any, have been met. Further, satisfactory provision and arrangement have been made concerning the following matters, where applicable. On a separate page, provide a narrative statement describing a request for a conditional use and a detailed response to the criteria listed below. Specify how and why the request is consistent with each of the criteria. a. Describe how the project is consistent with the Collier County Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan. Include information on how the request is consistent with the applicable section or portions of the Future Land Use Element. b. Describe the existing or planned means of ingress and egress to the property and proposed structure thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe. c. Describe the effect the conditional use will have on neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic impact, and odor. d. Describe the site’s and the proposed use’s compatibility with adjacent properties and other properties in the district. e. Please provide any additional information which you may feel is relevant to this request. Deed Restrictions: The County is legally precluded from enforcing deed restrictions; however, many communities have adopted such restrictions. You may wish to contact the civic or property owners association in the area for which this use is being requested in order to ascertain whether or not the request is affected by existing deed restrictions. Previous land use petitions on the subject property: To your knowledge, has a public hearing been held on this property within the last year? If so, what was the nature of that hearing? _____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ Official Interpretations or Zoning Verifications: To your knowledge, has there been an official interpretation or zoning verification rendered on this property within the last year? No Yes (If yes please provide copies.) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 30 Attachment: Application / Backup Materials (8988 : Eagle Ready Mix Collier Batch) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 3/17/2017 Page 7 of 14 STATEMENT OF UTILITY PROVISIONS FOR CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST APPLICANT INFORMATION Name of Applicant(s): ___________________________________________________________ Address: ______________________________City: ___________ State: ________ ZIP: _______ Telephone: ____________________ Cell: _____________________ Fax: __________________ E-Mail Address: ________________________________________________________________ Address of Subject Property (If available): ___________________________________________ City: ________________ State: __________ ZIP: ___________ LEGAL DESCRIPTION Section/Township/Range: / / Lot: Block: Subdivision: _______________________________________________ Plat Book: Page #: Property I.D. Number: _________________________________ Metes & Bounds Description: _____________________________________________________ TYPE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL TO BE PROVIDED Check applicable system: a. County Utility System b. City Utility System c. Franchised Utility System Provide Name: ____________________ d. Package Treatment Plant (GPD Capacity): ___________________ e. Septic System TYPE OF WATER SERVICE TO BE PROVIDED a. County Utility System b. City Utility System c. Franchised Utility System PROVIDE NAME_______________ d. Private System (Well) Total Population to be served: ____________________________________________________ Peak and Average Daily Demands: A. Water-Peak: _______ Average Daily: ________ B. Sewer-Peak: _______ Average Daily: ________ 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 31 Attachment: Application / Backup Materials (8988 : Eagle Ready Mix Collier Batch) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 3/17/2017 Page 8 of 14 If proposing to be connected to Collier County Regional Water System, please provide the date service is expected to be required: ____________________________________________ Narrative statement: Provide a brief and concise narrative statement and schematic drawing of sewage treatment process to be used as well as a specific statement regarding the method of affluent and sludge disposal. If percolation ponds are to be used, then percolation data and soil involved shall be provided from tests prepared and certified by a professional engineer. ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ County Utility Dedication Statement: If the project is located within the service boundaries of Collier County’s utility service system, a notarized statement shall be provided agreeing to dedicate the water distribution and sewage collection facilities within the project area to the Collier County Utilities. This shall occur upon completion of the construction of these facilities in accordance with all applicable County ordinances in effect at that time. This statement shall also include an agreement that the applicable system development charges and connection fees will be paid to the County Utilities Division prior to the issuance of building permits by the County. If applicable, the statement shall contain an agreement to dedicate the appropriate utility easements for serving the water and sewer systems. ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ Statement of Availability Capacity from other Providers: Unless waived or otherwise provided for at the pre-application meeting, if the project is to receive sewer or potable water services from any provider other than the County, a statement from that provider indicating adequate capacity to serve the project shall be provided. 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 32 Attachment: Application / Backup Materials (8988 : Eagle Ready Mix Collier Batch) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 3/17/2017 Page 9 of 14 RECORDING OF DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS Within 30 days of adoption of the Ordinance, the owner or developer at their expense shall record in the Public Records of Collier County a Memorandum of Understanding of Developer Commitments or Notice of Developer Commitments that contains the legal description of the property that is the subject of the land use petition and contains each and every commitment of the owner or developer specified in the Ordinance. The Memorandum or Notice shall be in form acceptable to the County and shall comply with the recording requirements of F.S. §695. A recorded copy of the Memorandum or Notice shall be provided to the assigned Principal Planner, Zoning Services Department, within 15 days of recording of said Memorandum or Notice. Chapter 8 of the Administrative Code requires that the applicant must remove their public hearing advertising sign(s) after final action is taken by the Board of County Commissioners. Based on the Board's final action on this item, please remove all public hearing advertising sign(s) immediately. 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 33 Attachment: Application / Backup Materials (8988 : Eagle Ready Mix Collier Batch) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 3/17/2017 Page 10 of 14 Pre-Application Meeting and Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: A Conditional Use to be heard by the Planning Commission and Board of Zoning Appeals A Minor Conditional Use to be heard by the Office of the Hearing Examiner Chapter 3 C.1. of the Administrative Code The following Submittal Requirement Checklist is to be utilized during the Pre-Application Meeting, and at time of application submittal. At time of submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with the application packet. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. Requirements for Review # Of Copies Required Not Required Completed Application (download current form from County website) 16 Cover letter briefly explaining the project 16 Pre-Application Notes 1 Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized 2 Completed Addressing Checklist 1 Warranty Deed(s) 3 Boundary Survey 3 Conceptual Site Plan 24” X 36” plus (one 8 ½ X 11 copy) Plans showing proposed location for utilities, if required Plans for screening and buffering the use with reference as to type, dimensions, and character, if required Plans showing the proposed landscaping and provisions for trees protected by County regulations, if required Plans showing the proposed signs and lighting, including type, dimensions, and character, if required Architectural Rendering of Proposed Structure(s), if applicable 4 Current aerial photographs (available from Property Appraiser) with project boundary and, if vegetated, FLUCFCS Codes with legend included on aerial. 5 Statement of utility provisions (with all required attachments & sketches) 1 Environmental Data Requirements, pursuant to LDC section 3.08.00 3 Environmental Data Requirements collated into a single Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) at time of public hearings. Coordinate with project planner at time of public hearing. Listed Species Survey; less than 12 months old. Include copies of previous surveys. 2 Traffic Impact Study (TIS) or waiver 7 Historical and Archeological Survey, or waiver 4 Electronic copy of all documents and plans * Please advise: The Office of the Hearing Examiner requires all materials to be submitted electronically in PDF format. 1 * If located in the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Area, include an additional set of each submittal requirement 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 34 Attachment: Application / Backup Materials (8988 : Eagle Ready Mix Collier Batch) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 3/17/2017 Page 11 of 14 ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS:  Following the completion of the review process by County review staff, the applicant shall submit all materials electronically to the designated project manager.  Please contact the project manager to confirm the number of additional copies required . ]Planners: Indicate if the petition needs to be routed to the following additional reviewers: Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment: Executive Director Emergency Management: Dan Summers; and/or EMS: Artie Bay Conservancy of SWFL: Nichole Ryan Graphics: Mariam Ocheltree City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director Utilities Engineering: Eric Fey Parks and Recreation: Vicky Ahmad Immokalee Water/Sewer District: Other: School District (Residential Components): Amy Heartlock Communication Towers: Mosquito Control Collier County Airport Authority Naples Airport Authority Commercial Mining: Impact Fees 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 35 Attachment: Application / Backup Materials (8988 : Eagle Ready Mix Collier Batch) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 36 Attachment: Application / Backup Materials (8988 : Eagle Ready Mix Collier Batch) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 3/17/2017 Page 13 of 14 Public Participation Requirements LDC Section 10.03.06 B. or C. Chapter 8 of the Administrative Code Notice for Minor Conditional Use Petitions Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) Requirements: Applicant must conduct a NIM at least 15 days prior to the Hearing Examiner’s receipt of the staff report and application materials in accordance with the applicable sections of the Administrative Code. The NIM shall be advertised and a mailed written notice shall be given to the property owners in the notification area at least 15 days prior to the NIM meeting. Mailed Notice: Written notice shall be sent to property owners in the notification area at least 15 days before the advertised Hearing Examiner hearing. Newspaper Advertisements: The legal advertisement shall be published at least 15 days before the advertised Hearing Examiner hearing in a newspaper of general circulation. The advertisement shall include at a minimum:  Date, time, and location of the hearing;  Description of the proposed land uses; and  2 in. x 3 in. map of the project location. Sign: A sign shall be posted at least 15 days before the advertised Hearing Examiner hearing date. Public Hearing for Minor Conditional Use Petitions Hearing Examiner: The Hearing Examiner shall hold at least 1 advertised public hearing. See Chapter 9 of the Administrative Code for the Office of the Hearing Examiner procedures. Notice for Conditional Use Petitions Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) Requirements: Applicant must conduct a NIM at least 15 days prior to the advertised public hearing. The NIM shall be advertised and a mailed written notice shall be given to the property owners in the notification area at least 15 days prior to the NIM meeting. Mailed Notice: Written notice shall be sent to property owners in the notification area at least 15 days before the advertised public hearing. 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 37 Attachment: Application / Backup Materials (8988 : Eagle Ready Mix Collier Batch) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 3/17/2017 Page 14 of 14 Newspaper Advertisements: The legal advertisement shall be published at least 15 days before the advertised public hearing in a newspaper of general circulation. The advertisement shall include at a minimum:  Date, time, and location of the hearing;  Description of the proposed land uses; and  2 in. x 3 in. map of the project location. Sign: A sign shall be posted at least 15 days before the advertised public hearing date. Public Hearing for Conditional Use Petitions Environmental Advisory Committee (EAC): The EAC shall hold at least 1 advertised public hearing, if required. Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC): The CCPC shall hold at least 1 public hearing. Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA): The BZA shall hold at least 1 advertised public hearing. 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 38 Attachment: Application / Backup Materials (8988 : Eagle Ready Mix Collier Batch) Conditional Use Cover Letter 1 | P a g e Eric Johnson, AICP August 15, 2017 Zoning Services Collier County Growth Management Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Re: Smyrna Ready Mix East Trail Plant Conditional Use Application Cover Letter Mr. Johnson, Attached is a Conditional Use application for an Asphalt and Concrete Batch Plant. The proposed Smyrna Ready Mix East Trail Plant is located along the north side of US 41 in Collier County, Florida. The property is within the both the Rural Industrial and the Rural Fringe Receiving Areas, on the County’s Future Land Use Map. The zoning designations on the property correspond to the future land use categories with part of the property zoned for Industrial and part of the property zoned as Agriculture (See attached maps). In accordance with LDC Section 2.03.04 and 2.03.08(A)2.a., an asphalt and concrete batch- making plant is an allowable use in the Industrial zoning district and a use allowable through a Conditional Use application in the Rural Fringe Receiving Area. While the Conditional Use applies to only the Rural Fringe Receiving area of the property, the plan provided shows the development over the entire property. Surrounding Uses The subject property is located in an area with a mix of Industrial, agriculture and low density residential development in the immediate surrounding area. The property is within an area of industrial development and the subject parcel is split with an Industrial future land use and zoning on the southern proportion of the property and Agriculture on the northern portion. To the south of the property is industrial development and specifically outdoor storage associated with an automobile salvage yard. To the south of that, along US 41 is an aasphalt and concrete batch-making plant, a similar use to the one proposed. To the west and north of the subject property are vacant lands classified by the property appraiser for various agricultural activities. To the east of the subject property is a small storage shed which appears to be for private individual usage. The closest residential use appears to be located over 750 feet away from the subject property’s eastern property line. In accordance with LDC Section 10.08.00 and the Standards of Approval for a Conditional Use in the application, below is an analysis of how the subject property meets the criteria in the land development code. 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 39 Attachment: Application / Backup Materials (8988 : Eagle Ready Mix Collier Batch) Conditional Use Cover Letter 2 | P a g e a.Consistency with the LDC and Growth Management Plan. The subject property is located within both the Rural Industrial and the Rural Fringe Receiving land use categories on the future land use map in the Collier County Growth Management Plan. In accordance with Policy II(C) un the Future Land Use Description in the Growth Management Plan, “The Rural Industrial District, which encompasses approximately 900 acres of existing industrial areas outside of Urban designated areas, is intended, and shall be reserved, for industrial type uses.” The proposed use is consistent with this policy and is a use built to the south of the subject property within the same future land use category. Section II(B) defines the Rural Fringe Receiving area as: “Receiving Lands are those lands within the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District that have been identified as being most appropriate for development…” The description goes on to list the specific uses that are allowed within the Rural Fringe Receiving area under section II(B)(1)(A)5, which includes: t) Asphalt and concrete batch-making plants. b.Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe. The subject property has access to US 41 through the industrial access road, Auto Village Road, leading to US 41. Use of Auto Village Road will promote a safe environment for the truck traffic, avoiding the intermingling with non-industrial uses or pedestrian activity. At the access to US 41 are striped turn lanes allowing for safe ingress and egress and ease of flow of traffic. c.The effect the conditional use would have on neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor effects. The asphalt and concrete batch plant operation is located in an area that is isolated from properties that may present compatibility concerns. The subject property is along a road and within an area that comprises of all industrial uses, an asphalt and concrete batch plant and an automobile salvage yard. The use itself does not let off glare or odor. The concept plan has been designed to locate the building and storage area to the south of the property, closer in proximity to the other industrial uses. Any noise that will be generated will be set back far enough from adjacent properties to mitigate potential concerns. The closest residential unit is over 750 feet to the east, across the adjacent property, and over 1,000 feet from any on site use that will generate noise. Based on the 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 40 Attachment: Application / Backup Materials (8988 : Eagle Ready Mix Collier Batch) Conditional Use Cover Letter 3 | P a g e location, the surrounding uses and the site plan lay out, there will be no negative economic effects to surrounding properties. d. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district. As described above, based on the location, adjacent uses and design of the site, there are no compatibility issues with adjacent properties. Similar uses already exist to the south of the property. To the north and west are vacant agricultural lands. To the east is a storage shed that appears to belong to the residential unit another parcel over farther to the east, approximately 750 feet from the subject property and over 1,000 feet from any use that may generate noise. Through the location of the structures and site activity on the site plan and the surrounding uses on adjacent and nearby parcels, the proposed asphalt and concrete batch plant will not have negative compatibility impacts on adjacent properties. e. Please provide any additional information which you may feel is relevant to this request. Attached to this application is an environment assessment conducted by Dex Bender and Associates. According to the analysis there are not environmental issues on site. The property is heavily infested with exotic vegetation and none of the on site habitat communities would be classified as native. There is an eagle’s nest that has been located by the FFWCC to the north of the property. The proposed use has been designed to locate open space and water management areas on the north side of the property creating adequate separation from the nest. In conclusion, the proposed Conditional Use for the Asphalt and Concrete Batch Plant meets the criteria for approval of Conditional Uses, is in compliance and meets the intent of the Collier County Growth Management Plan and therefore be granted. Should you have any questions or require any additional information, do not hesitate to contact me. Best regards. Daniel DeLisi, AICP DeLisi, Inc. 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 41 Attachment: Application / Backup Materials (8988 : Eagle Ready Mix Collier Batch) £¤41 Esri, HERE, DeLorme, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, andthe GIS user community, Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, EarthstarGeographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and theGIS User C ommunityJ Legend Boun dary Smyrna Ready Mix Concrete16576 Gator RoadFort Myers, FL 33912 Smyrna Ready Mix East Trail PlantAerial Location Map 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 42 Attachment: Application / Backup Materials (8988 : Eagle Ready Mix Collier Batch) £¤41 J Legend Subject Property Future Land Use RFR RI UC UR URF AG Smyrna Ready Mix Concrete16576 Gator RoadFort Myers, FL 33912 Smyrna Ready Mix East Trail PlantAerial Location Map 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 43 Attachment: Application / Backup Materials (8988 : Eagle Ready Mix Collier Batch) Smyrna Ready Mix East Trail PlantZoning Map Smyrna Ready Mix Concrete16576 Gator RoadFort Myers, FL 33912 £¤41 A TTRVC I I ATTRVC A PUD AJ Legend Roads Boun dary Zoning _Districts 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 44 Attachment: Application / Backup Materials (8988 : Eagle Ready Mix Collier Batch) *fuC-ot*tty AppliconvAgent mdy olso send site plons ot conceptuol plons lot rcview in odvonce if desited. P120170002351 Grovvth Management Department Zoning Division PRE-APP INFORMATION Assigned Ops Staff: Camden Smith, John DeBlasiis SIAFF FORM FOR SUPPI.CMEI{TAI PRE.APPUCANON MEETING INFORMATION o Name and Number ofwho submitted pre-app request Name / number / email: Faleesha Fernandez/ 239-405-9148/ faleesha@jreeng.com . Agent to list for PL# Name of Company and agent: J.R. Evans Engineering, p.A. and Chris Mitchell, p.E. . Owner of property (all owners for all parcels) ) List individually and by parcel: Hollingshead Land LLC and parcel No.OO7636OOOO6 o Confirm Purpose of Pre-App: (Rezone, etc.) Yes / No (list purpose if different): Discuss conditional use of concrete batch plant on agricultural zoned land. Please list the density request of the project if applicable and number of homes/units/offices/docks (any that applv): Describe the project here. Provide density measures, size of development and details here so that staff may be prepared to address relative information. Size: 7.3 acres The land is zoned half for industrial and the other half agricultural. The concrete batch plant will be located in the agricultural zone land area. Details about Proiect (choose type that applies!: PUD or PUD-A - is this a phased development and if so what schedule is being proposed? ls the proposal for a specific Tract or addition of a Tract/Use? Not a phased project and N/A Variance - What are you seeking a variance of: zoning, primary use, etc.? provide details. To be determined. Requesting the meeting to discuss the conditional use of a concrete batch reactor on agricultural land. Supplemental lnformation provided by: Name Title Email Phone Zqrng DMsin. 2m ildfi Hcsedpe D e.l.bdes, Fbda 34104'23252-2400.*rrcds!oi.rpt 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 45 Attachment: Application / Backup Materials (8988 : Eagle Ready Mix Collier Batch) v C-Ou7-ty COLTIER COUNW GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION www.colliersov.net 28OO NORTH HORSESHOE ORIVE NAPrES, FLORTDA 34104 1239l.2s2-24OO Pre-Application Meeting Notes Petition Type:CU Date and 1;.". Tue 711112017, 1:30 PM-2:30 PM Assigned Planner:Eric Johnson Engineerint Manager (for PPt's and FFs): Project lnfo.mation Proj ect Name: Eagle Ready Mix Collier Batch Plant PL#. PL20170002361 Property lo #: Project Address:. NAPLES AJI , OVERLAY RFMUO-RECEIVING City state: FL zip.34114 763600006 Applicant: Agent Name:Faleesha Phone. (239)287-4941 Agent/Firm Address:9351 Corkscrew Road city: EStero state: FL zip, FL Property owner. HOLLINGSHEAD LAND LLC, Address:4472 HtCKORy GROVE ROAD Please provide the fol i. Total Acreage: ii. Proposed # of Residential Units: _ iii. Proposed Commercial Square Footage: _ iv. For Amendments, indicate the original petition number: -- v. lf there is an ordinance or Resolution associated with this project, please indicate the type and number: lowing, if applicable: 7.3 Current Zoning: 15583 TAMIAMITRL E Faleesha vi. lf the project is within a plat, provide the name and AR#/pt#: 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 46 Attachment: Application / Backup Materials (8988 : Eagle Ready Mix Collier Batch) C-,ouUty Pre-Application Meeting SignJn Sheet PL# Jo/2 D2O.)3G / COtt|ER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net Collier County Contact lnformation : Review Discipline Phone Email ! David Antho Environmental Review davidanth colliergov.net A, Summer Araque Environmental Review 252-6290 summerbrownaraque@collie net Steve Baluch!Transportation Planning 252-2367 Ste enBaluch@colliergov.net X Laurie Beard PUD Monitorin 252-5782 lauriebeard@collie net J Mark Burtchin ROW Permitting 252-5765 markburtchin@collie ov.net Cascio!G utili Billi 252-5543 ecascio@colliergov.net : HeidiAshton cicko Man Asst. County Attorn 252-8773 heidiashton@collie net E John DeBlasiis Zoni Services / Plannin Tech 252-7050 hndeblasis@collie net Dale FeyE North Collier Fire dal @collie .net DeselemK Zon in Services 252-2586 kaydeselem@colli .net I Eric Fey, P.E utili Plan Review 252-2434 ericfey@colli v, net Sue Faulkner Comprehensive Plannin 252-5775 suefaulkner@colliergov.net f Paula Fleishman lm ct Fee Administration 252-2924 aulafleishman@colli .net Michael Gibbons!Structural/Residential Plan Review michael bbons@colliergov.net Gundlach, AICP, PLAI r,,ra Zonin Services 252-2444 nancygundlach@colli .net Shar Hi!on East Na es Fire District 687-56s0 shingson@ccfco I John Houldsworth Engineerin Services 252-5757 ohnhouldsworth@colli ergov.net ES! Jodi Hu Transportation Pathw ays jodihu hes@colliergov.net Il elicia Humphries -Of-Way PermittiR 252-2326 aliciah u m ph ries@collie rgov.netxEric Johnson, AICP CFM Zoni Services 252-2937 ov.neteflcohnson@collie Marcia Kendall!Comprehensive Planni 252-23a7 marcia kenda ll@colli v. net Ku lak!pa Zoni Services / Plannin g Tech 252-1035 atriciakulak@collie net Ste LenI f Environmental Review 252-2915 ov.netstevelenberger@colliell Paulo Martins ulomartins@colli ergov.net Thomas Mastroberto Fire SafetyGreater Na les 252-7348 v.netThomasmastroberto@collie Jack McKenna, p.E!neering ServicesE 252-29Lr ackmckenna@colli . net Matt Mclean, P.E.!ManPrincipal Pro 2s2-8279 matthewmclean @colliergov.net. Gilbert Moncivaiz utili lmpact Fees 252 4275 lbertmoncivaiz@collie . net!Michele Mosca , AICP lm act Fee Administration 252-2466 netmichelemosca@collie! Annis Moxam Addressin 252-5s19 .netannismoxam@collie updated 4/26/201.7 Pagel4of5 28OO NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FTORIDA 34104 (2t9}. 252-24OO Name 252-5744 Utilities 252-4285 252-2497 252-2426 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 47 Attachment: Application / Backup Materials (8988 : Eagle Ready Mix Collier Batch) Co et County COtI.IER COUNW GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net Additional Attendee Contact lnformation : 28OO NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORTDA 34104 12391252-24OO K,OA- Graphics 252-2375 mariamocheltree@colliergov.net [l Brandy Otero Transit 2s2-s859 brandyotero@colliergov.net 252-1?,10 hi ll p, n.2 ke fAcol I iergov net Brandi Pollard!Utility lmpact fees 2s2-6237 brandipollard@colliergov.net Fred Reischl, AICP Zoning Services 252-42!r fredreischl@colliergov.net Brett Rosenblum, P.E.!Stormwater Plan Review 2s2-290 brettrosenblum@colliergov.net Richard OrthE Stormwater Plan Review richardorth@colliergov.net ff. tvtichael Sawyer Transportation Planning 252-2926 michaelsawyer@colliergov.net .- Corby Schmidt, AICP Comprehensive Planning 252-2944 corbyschmidt@colliergov.net r. Chris scott, AICP Planning and Zoning 252-2460 chrisscott@colliergov.net Peter Shawinskytr Architectural Review 252-4523 petershawinsky@colliergov.net - Camden Smith Zoning SeMces / Operations Ana \,st 252-7042 camdensmith@colliergov.net X Scott Stone Assistant County Attorney Scottstone@colliergov.net L Mark Strain Hearing Examiner/CCPC 252-4446 markstrain@colliergov.net Mark TempletonE Landscape Review 252-2475 marktempleton @colliergov.net Kris VanLengen4 Utility Planning 252-5366 krisvanlengen@colliergov.net ! Jessica Velasco Zoning Division 252-2584 jessicavelasco@colliergov.net il Jon Walsh Building Review 252-2962 jonathanwalsh@colliergov.net David Weeks, AICPtr Future Land Use Consistency 252-2306 davidweeks@colliergov. net Kirsten Wilkie Environmental Review 252-5518 kirstenwilkie@colliergov.net Christine Willoughbytr Planning and Zoning 252-5748 christinewilloughby@colliergov.net Name Representing Phone Email \L l-\L a @6H\)s1-ss31 F.t,7 t-1A-ro 2)lGt .-nrhe{I.€ su lr,.- P,/1Ir ,kLttJ Crni hl^,i Co ltre tL 6p "r l:?s7-(re N(Tkcn;O $uiet updated 4/26/20L7 Page l5of5 Mariam Ocheltree BillP.{€rke.--N^.fh a^llier Firp Srfptv 252-5092 252-5740 u,rril(^ ".Lq-G c " (;.to,,.r l.1Trzt/1" a ,r").,blo E'.ubeA 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 48 Attachment: Application / Backup Materials (8988 : Eagle Ready Mix Collier Batch) et C-ouuty Cha ter 3 C.1. of the Administrative Code The following Submittal Requirement Checklist is to be utilized during the Pre-Application Meeting, and at time of application submittal. At time of submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with the application packet. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. lncomplete submittals wlll not be accepted. Not Required Application (download current form from County website)Com leted 16 Cover letter bri explaining the project 16 Pre-lication Notes 1 Affidavit of 1 signed and notarizedi 2 Warra Deed(s)3 Bounda Survey 3 Con ual Site Plan 24" X 36" plus (one 8 % X 11 co pv) Plans showing proposed location for utilities, if uired Plans for screeninB and buffering the use with reference as to type, dimensions, and character, if required n il n Plans showing the proposed landscaping and provisions for trees protected by Coun ulations, if required n Plans showing the proposed signs and lighting, including type, dimensions, and character, if required w' Architectural Rendering of Proposed Structure(s), if applicable 4 n Current aerial photographs (available from property Appraiser) with project and, if vegetated, FLUcFCS Codes with I end included on aerialbounda 5 Statement of utility provisions (with all required attachments & sketches )1 n Environmental Data Requirements, pursuant to LDC section 3.Og.OO 3 !Environmental Statement (El5 Data Requirements collated into a single Environmental lmpact ) at time of public hearings. Coordinate with project planner at ti of ublic hearin Listed Species Survey; less than 12 months old lnclude copies of previous surveys 2 !Traffic lmpact Study (TlS) or waiver 7 Historical and Archeol cal Surve , or watver 4 ectronic copy of all documents and plansEI fficPehTa5eoe e ol the Ex ma n e U are5 m ate afl s btoeq e us mb ditte ectel o ican P o foF m a 1 * lf located in the Bayshore/ requirement Gateway Triangle Redevelopment A rea, includ e an additional set of each submittal -wrjr-.zI'iJT I[,J7.7t, I-]Ii,rL Page 1 of 5 COLLIER COUNry GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.collierpov.net 28OO NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FIORIDA 34104 12391 2s2-24OO FAx: (239) 2s2-6358 Pre-Application Meeting and Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: E A Conditional Use to be heard by the Planning Commission and Board of Zoning Appeals fl A Minor Conditional Use to be heard by the Office of the Hearing Examiner Requirements for Review flof Copies Required lt4 ft lx,II Comoleted Addressinp Checklist ft ftr( ..fttt,ftftW.ftn a/ IYiltr W,w >E (! V M trIV advise:Hearing in / 3/77 /2017 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 49 Attachment: Application / Backup Materials (8988 : Eagle Ready Mix Collier Batch) 'r C-OUW ty COtt|ER COUNry GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.collierEov,net ADOITIONAT REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PUBTIC HEARING PROCESS: . Following the completion ofthe review process by County review staff, the applicant shall submit all materials electronically to the designated proiect manager. . Please contact the project manager to confirm the number of additional copies required. lPlanners: lndicate if the petition needs to be routed to the followi additional reviewers: Communication Towers: Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Executive Director d Emergency Management: Oan Summers; and/or /EMS: Artie Bay Con servancy of SWFL: Nichole Ryan Graphics: tM.riaftffitree Mtke Dt.pq.StrCity of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Oirector Utilities Engineering: Eric Fey Parks and Recreation: Vicky Ahmad lmmokalee Water/Sewer District: Other:n School District (Residential Components): Amy Heartlock Mosquito Control Collier County Airport Authority f,,laples Airport Authority Commercial Mini lmpact Fees 3/ 17 /2017 Page 2 of 5 28OO NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 123912s2-24OO FAx: (239) 252-6358 tr tqZII ! 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 50 Attachment: Application / Backup Materials (8988 : Eagle Ready Mix Collier Batch) t C-,OUL w COLTIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www,collierpov.net 28OO NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPIES, FLORIDA 34104 l2t9l 2s2-240o FAx: (239) 2s2-53s8 FEE REQUIREMENTS All checks paydble to: Eoord ol County Commissioners ' Pre-Application Meeting: S500.00 (to be credited towards the application fee if the application is filed _ within 9 months of pre-application neettngl /rt 1p KConditional Use Application Fee: 54,OOO.OOo When filed with Rezone Petition: S1,500.00 ., o Additional fee for 5rh and subsequent reviews: 20% of original fee \Uaomprehenslve Planning Consistency Review: g3OO.00 E/ Environmental Data Requirements-Els Packet (submittal determined at pre-application meetint): 52,soo.o0 Listed or Protected Species survey review fee (when an EIS is not required): S1,000.00 Transportation Fee, if required: Ia Methodology Review Fee: 5500.00o Minor Study Review Fee: $750.00o Major Study Review Fee: S1,500.00 Estimated Legal Advertisint Fee for the Hearint Examiner or CCPC: S1,125.00 Estimated Letal Advertising Fee for the BZA, if required: S50O.OO Fire code Plons Review Fees ore collected ot the time ol applicotion submission dnd those fees ore set forth by the Authority hoving iurisdiction. The Land Development Code requires Neighborhood Notificotion moilers for Applicotions heoded to heoring, ond this fee is collected prior to heorinq. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. All checks poyable to: Boord of County Commissioners. The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Department ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Agent/Owner Signature Date Applicant/Owner Name (please print) f fl p/A D 3/17 /2077 Page 3 of 5 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 51 Attachment: Application / Backup Materials (8988 : Eagle Ready Mix Collier Batch) JohnsonEric From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: WeeksDavid Thursday, )uly L3, 20L7 10:23 AM JohnsonEric BellowsRay; BosiMichael 7/LL/17 CU pre-app for batch plant partially in RFMUO Receiving Lands Eric, Just discussed this with Mike. My opinion is that the RFMUO supersedes the underlying "A" zoning - which contains conditions to be addressed for such a CU (all of which appear to pertain to compatibility); therefore, those conditions are not applicable on their face. Having said that, LDC Sec. 10.08.00 D. pertaining to review of CU petitions (see below), states "that satisfactory provision and arrangement has been made for the following matters, where applicable." One of those "matters" is compatibility. As such, I think it is appropriate to consider each of those "A" district CU standards Cmatters') as a guide in determining whether the use is compatible with surrounding and nearby properties . [As an example, the fact that the site is <10 acres is not, in and of itself, basis for finding the petition incompatible since that "condition" to address does not strictly apply - the matter to consider would be whether the site could be designed and the use operated in a manner deemed compatible with surrounding and nearby properties (which may or may not be possible due to the parcel's size and/or dimensions - 7.3 acres; 329'x969'per PAO GIS). Even if the parcel were >10 acres, if it were narrow enough and/or located proximate to residential uses, it might be that it is not possible to make this use compatible.l D. Findings. The Planning Commission shall make a recommendation of approval, approval with conditions, or denial of the conditional use to the Board of Zoning Appeals. The Planning Commission's recommendation of approval or approval with conditions shall find that the granting of the Gonditional use will not adversely affect the public and any specific requirements pertaining to the conditional use have been met by the petitioner. Further, that satisfactory provision and arrangement has been made for the following matters, where applicable: 1. Consistency with the LDC and Growth Management Plan. 2. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe. 3. The effect the conditional use would have on neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor effects. 4. Compatiblllty with adjacent properties and other property in the district. Dayi4. W@-frL David Weeks, AICP, Growth Management Manager Collier County Government, Growth Management Department Zoning Division, Comprehensive planning Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples,FL34lO4 phone: 239 -252-2306; Elax: 239 -2SZ-66a9 email: dayidweeks@colliergov.net ; website: www.colliergoy.net 1 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 52 Attachment: Application / Backup Materials (8988 : Eagle Ready Mix Collier Batch) t-:-@!r. <17,,.,,J4r- Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. lnstead, contact this offlce by telephone or in wriling. 2 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 53 Attachment: Application / Backup Materials (8988 : Eagle Ready Mix Collier Batch) A a g,1trh C-,ouuty Dt1 1,e t,c,Vl uD-Aeer Notest323 o ru s 4n-,TAz R 4f/24'(l o es C*o FM ,'l Z lrl/L C,rv !-a-ut /-k- /Neet-zc,-;L"z/t/ a2- a_ J hr-,"/o-/s " u.&ui/t i o," lJrl,4 0s ) +t/ COLTIER COUNIY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION www.collierpov.net 28OO NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FTORIDA 34104 123912s2-24OO ,{t VLU- V t4 P 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 54 Attachment: Application / Backup Materials (8988 : Eagle Ready Mix Collier Batch) ET Crovmty COTLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercov.net 28OO NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPIES, FTORIDA 34104 1239t.Z'2-24OO Meeting Notes 5€s @ 7 t updated 4/26/2077 Page l2of5 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 55 Attachment: Application / Backup Materials (8988 : Eagle Ready Mix Collier Batch) .fff"r.nn nw COttIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT .collierEov.net 28OO NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPTES, FLORIDA 34104 123912'2-Z4OO Znrs r(o A111 {'I'q"eQ.rtl[.tL 8. Meeting Notes e*a{,irot C L 5 fol (e r[u flet<r Pro .u)r FL ur 6 cl APo.rA [ , tlt,<|"-lr P(o<eL* Aera\ r* |t* lar..r tt I ^J f L E "r1uA( dEqc rJrs 4h tu€l- [4o(row 0 +" ?lenst Prov,le fuole.Ie Qeke<5fL A*a*t6f rro1r1, u s6,d 0i Disclaimer lnfomation provided by 2taff to appticant duing the pre-Apptication Meeting isbased on the best avaitabte data at the time oi the meefinj and may not fuily irriiiiJapplicant of issues that coutd aise duing fhe p/ocess. Th; Administrative code antd LDCdictates the regulations which alt applicaiions musf satrsfy. Any checklists provided of requireddata .for an appricatlon may not fuily ouiline what is neeaea. n is tne appricini" ,""pinrioititv toprovide all required data. updated 4/26/2077 Pagel3of5 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 56 Attachment: Application / Backup Materials (8988 : Eagle Ready Mix Collier Batch) Environmental Checklist Project Name ErGte C R onditional Use fA fntl Bntc ?tANt Is the project is in compliance with the overlays, districts and/or zoning on the subject site and/or the surrounding properties? (CON.. ST. PUp. RLSA. RFMU- etc.) (LDC 2.03.05-2.03.08:4.08.00) Nor in CV Library srbri, "Bf;*tldr, ,ffi,#.f,',Y ) rr. the properry Appraiser,s office) and crearry derineare the subject site boundary lines. Ifthe site is vegetated, provide FLUCFCS overlay and vegetation inventory identifing upland, wetland and exotic vegetation (Admin. Code Ch. 3 G.l. Application Contents #24). FLUCFCS Overlay -P627 Clearly identifu the location ofall preserves and label each as "Preserve" on all plans. (LDC 3.05.07.A.2). Preserve Label- P546 Created and retained preserve areas shall meet the minimum width requirements per LDC 3.05.07.H.1.b. Preserve width - P603 Retained preservation areas shall be selected based on the criteria defined in LDC 3.05.07.A.3, include all 3 strata, be in the largest contiguous area possible and shall be interconnected within the site and to adjoining off-site preservation areas or wildlife corridors. (LDC 3.05.07.A.1-4) Preserve Selection- P550 Principle structures shall be located a minimum of 25'from the boundary ofthe preserve boundary. No accessory structures and other site alterations, fill placement, grading, plant alteration or removal, or similar activity shall be permitted within l0' ofthe boundary unless it can be shown that it will not affect the integrity ofthe preserve (i.e. stem wall or berm around wetland preserve). Provide cross-sections for each preserve boundary identifting all site alterations within 25'. (LDC 3.05.07.H.3; 6.01.02.C.) Preserve Setback - New @ Wildlife survey required for sites where Listed Species - P522 ,ft,t). not required. when so warran-Sla tnv aala L l^Provide Environmental Data identifoing author credentials, consistency determination with the GMP s,o -srte preserves, seasonal and historic high water levels, and analysis ofwater qua lity. For land previously used for farm identiling any site contamination.fields or golfcourse, provide soil sampling/groundwater monitorin (LDC 3.08.00) Environmental Data Required - P 522 g @ Master Plan shall state the minimum acreage required to be preserved. (LDC 10.02.13.A.2) Master Plan Contents-P626 Additional Comments: Environmental Data Checklist Project Name &z The Environmental Data requiremenrscan be found in LDC Section 3.0g.00 provide the ErS ree irpuD or ,.. ,t (l^N,;,l.a- kA''l'ln LU, wHo AND WHAT coMpANy PREPARED THE ENVIRONMENTAL DATA REpoRT? preparation ofEnvironmental Data. Environmental Data submittal Requirements shall be prepared uy an i-noiviauar wltrracademic credentials and experience in the area ofenvironmental sciences or naturat ."ror* ,unug"ran,. o @ Provide calculations on site plan showing the appropriate acreage of native vegetation to be retained, the max. amount and ratios permitted to be created on-site or mitigated off-site. Exclude vegetation located within utility and drainage easements from the preserve calculations (LDC 3.05.07.B-D;3.05.07.F; 3.05.07.H.1.d-e). Preserve Calculation - P547 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 57 Attachment: Application / Backup Materials (8988 : Eagle Ready Mix Collier Batch) 0 Academic credentials and experience shall be a bachelor's or higher degree in one ofthe biological sciences with at least two years of ecological or biological professional experience in the Slate of Florida. Please include revision dates on resubmittals, Identif on a curent aerial, the location and acreage of all SFWMD jurisdictional wetlands according to the Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS) and include this information on the SDP or final plat construction plans. Wetlands must be verified by the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) or Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) prior to SDP or final plat construction plans approval. For sites in the RFMU district, provide an assessment in accordance with 3.05.07 F and identifo on the FLUCFCS map the location ofall high quality wetlands (wetlands having funclionality scores ofat least 0.65 WRAP or 0.7 UMAM) and their location within the proposed development plan. Sites with high quality wetlands must have their functionality scores verified by the SFWMD or DEP prior to first development order approval. Where functionality scores have not been verified by either the SFWMD or DEP, scores must be reviewed and accepted by County stafl consistent with State regulation. SDP or final plat construction plans with impacts to five (5) or more acres of wetlands shall provide an analysis of potential water quality impacts of the project by evaluating water quality loadings expected from the project (post development conditions considering the proposed land uses and stormwater management controls) compared with water quality loadings of the project area as it exists in its pre-development conditions. The analysis shall be performed using methodologies approved by Federal and State water quality agencies, and must demonstrate no increase in nutrients (nitrogen and phosphorous) loadings in the post development scenario. Where treated stormwater is allowed to be directed into preserves, show how the criteria in 3.05.07 H have been met. Where native vegetation is retained on site, provide a topographic map to a half foot and, where possible, \) provide elevations within each ofthe FLUCFCS C plans, include this information on the site plans. For SDP or final olat constructionuAlr,'4#5 a.2vrn lno*n to inh!/bit biotogical identified.on site Provide a wildlife survey for the nests of bald eagle and for listed species communities similar to those existing on site. The survey shall be conducted in accordance wilh the guidelines or recommendations of the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FFWCC) and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). Survey times may be reduced or waived where an initial habitat assessment by the environmental consultant indicates that the likelihood of Iisted species occurrence is low. as determined by the FFWCC and USFWS. Where an initial habitat assessment by the environmental consultant indicates that the likelihood of listed species occurrence is low, the survey time may be reduced or waived by the County Manager or designee, when the project is not reviewed or technical assistance not provided by the FFWCC and USFWS. Additional survey time may be required if listed species are discovered Provide a survey for listed plants identified in 3.04.03 wildlife habitat managemenl and monitoring plans in accordance with 3.04.00 shall be required where Iisted species are utilizing the site or where wildlife habitat management and monitoring plans are required by the FFWCC or USFWS. These plans shall describe how the project directs incompatible land uses away from listed species and their habitats. Identifu the location of listed species nests, burrows, dens, foraging areas, and the Iocation of any bald eagle nests or nest protection zones on the native vegetation aerial with FLUCFCS overlay for the site. Wildlife habitat management plans shall be included on the SDP or final plat construction plans. Bali eag.le management plans are required for sites containing bald eagle nests or nest protection zones, copies of which shall be included on the SDP or final plat construction plans. 9 o \0 b,L W,\/w\Ak R/,"fu.,p1 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 58 Attachment: Application / Backup Materials (8988 : Eagle Ready Mix Collier Batch) @ r 0.02.06. Identiry on a culrent aerial the acreage, location and community types of all upland and wetland habitats on the project site, according to the Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS), and provide a legend for each ofthe FLUCFCS Codes identified. Aerials and overlay information must be legible at the scale provided. Provide calculations for the acreage of native vegetation required to be retained on-site. lnclude the above referenced calculations and aerials on the SDP or final plat construction plans. In a separate report, demonstrate how the preserve selection criteria pursuant to 3.05.07 have been met. Where applicable, include in this report an aerial showing the project boundaries along with any undeveloped land, preserves, natural flowways or other natural land features. located on abutting properties. Include on a separate site plan, the project boundary and the land use designations and overlays for the RLSA, RI\4I1, ST and ACSC-ST districts. Include this information on the SDP or final plat construction plans. Where off-site preservation of native vegetation is proposed in lieu ofon-site, demonstrate that the criteria in section 3.05.07 have been met and provide a note on the SDP or final plat construction plans indicating the type ofdonation (monetary payment or land donation) identified to satisfo the requirement. Include on the SDP or final plat construction plans, a location map(s) and property identification numbe(s) ofthe off-site parcel(s) if off-site donation of land is to occur. Provide the results ofany Environmental Assessments and/or Audits ofthe property, along with a narrative ofthe measures needed to remediate if required by FDEP. Soil and/or ground water sampling shall be required at the time of first development order submittal for sites that occupy farm fields (crop fields, cattle dipping ponds, chemical mixing areas), golfcourses, Iandfill orjunkyards or for sites where hazardous products exceeding 250 gallons of liquid or 1,000 pounds ofsolids were stored or processed or where hazardous wastes in excess of 220 pounds per month or I l0 gallons at any point in time were generated or stored. The amount of sampling and testing shall be determined by a registered professional with experience in the field ofEnvironmental Site Assessment and shall at a minimum test for organochlorine pesticides (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 8081) and Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) 8 metals using Florida Department ofEnvironmental Protection (FDEP) soil sampling Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) FS 3000, in areas suspected of being used for mixing and at discharge point of water management system. Sampling should occur randomly if no points ofcontamination are obvious. Include a background soil analysis from an undeveloped location hydraulically upgradient ofthe potentially contaminated site. Soil sampling should occurjust below the root zone, about 6 to l2 inches below ground surface or as otherwise agreed upon with the registered professional with experience in the field of Environmental Site Assessment. Include in orwith the Environmental Site Assessment, the acceptable State and Federal pollutant levels for the types of contamination found on site and indicate in the Assessment, when the contaminants are over these levels. If this analysis has been done as part ofan Environmental Audit then the report shall be submitted. The County shall coordinate with the FDEP where contamination exceeding applicable FDEP standards is identified on site or where an Environmental Audit or Environmental Assessment has been submitted. Identifo any Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zones (WRM-ST) within the project area and provide an analysis for how the project design avoids the most intensive land uses within the most sensitive WRM-STs and will comply with the WRM-ST pursuanl to 3.06.00. Include the location of the Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zones on the SDP or final plat construction plans. For land use applications such as standard and PUD rezones and CUs, provide a separate site plan or zoning map with the roject boundary an Wel lfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zones identified ons te ahat e design ofthe proposed stormwater management system and analysis of water quality andquantityrmpactsfully incorporate the requirements of the Watershed Management regulations of 3.07.00. 13. Jr I8. For sites located in the Big Cypress Area ofCritical State Concern-Special Treatment overlay district (ACSC- ST), show how the project is consistent with the development standa;ds and regulations in q.OZ)q. ,k 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 59 Attachment: Application / Backup Materials (8988 : Eagle Ready Mix Collier Batch) /-\ lv t\ rt f1/ # For development orders within RFMU sending lands, show how the project is consistent wilh each ofthe applicable Objectives and Policies ofthe Conservation and Coastal Management Element ofthe GMP. The County Manager or designee may require additional data or information necessary to evaluate the project's compliance with LDC and GMP requirements. (LDC 10.02.02.4.3 l) The following to be determined at preapplication meeting (Choose those that apply) d. Provide overall description of project with respect to environmental and water management issues. Explain how project is consistent with each ofthe applicable objectives and policies in the CCME ofthe GMP. Explain how the project meets or exceeds the native vegetation preservation requirement in the CCME and LDC. Indicate wetlands to be impacted and the effects ofthe impact to their functions and how the project's design compensates for wetland impacts. Indicate how the project design minimizes impacts to listed species. Describe the measures that are proposed as mitigation for impacts to listed species. PUD zoning and CU petitions. For PUD rezones and CU petitions, applicants shall collate and package applicable Environmental Data Submittal Requirements into a single Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)0 document- orior to oublic hearincs and---- provided to the -ounryIhnager or des *thL ffu');u,) after all applicable staffreviews are complete. Copies ofthe EIS shall be ignee prior to public hearings. d.lfrAlw'^rA a* R!il,t--J-Ja),1;14jao !/dU leye- Is EAC Review (by CCPC) required? PUD master plan or PPL/SDP site plan notes:zo/Lz. Where preserves occur adjacent to development off site and will be used in lieu of landscape buffers, include the following condition in the environmental commitments section of the PUD document. Preserves may be used to satisly the landscape buffer requirements after exotic vegetalion removal in accordance with LDC sections 4.06.02 and 4.06.05.E.1 . Supplemental plantings with native plant materials shall be in accordance with LDC section 3.05.07. 24. Additional comments 25. Stipulations for approval (Conditions) Ilo a-aL ruru,tt 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 60 Attachment: Application / Backup Materials (8988 : Eagle Ready Mix Collier Batch) et C-ounty 28OO NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FTORIDA 34104 12391252-24oo FAX: (23e) 252-6358 Public Participation Requirements Notice for Minor Conditional Use Petitions Neighborhood lnformation Meeting (NlM) Requirements: Applicant must conduct a NIM at least 15 days prior to the Hearing Examiner's receipt of the staff report and application materials in accordance with the applicable sections of the Administrative Code. The NIM shall be advertised and a mailed written notice shall be given to the property owners in the notification area at least 15 days prior to the NIM meeting. Mailed Notice: Written notice shall be sent to property owners in the notification area at least 15 days before the advertised Hearing Examiner hearing. Newspaper Advertisements: The legal advertisement shall be published at least 15 days before the advertised Hearing Examiner hearing in a newspaper of general circulation. The advertisement shall include at a minimum: . Date, time, and location ofthe hearing; o Description of the proposed land uses; and. 2 in. x 3 in. map of the project location. Sign: A sign shall be posted at least 15 days before the advertised Hearing Examiner hearing date. Public Hearing for Minor Conditional Use petitions Hearing Examiner: The Hearing Examiner shall hold at least 1 advertised public hearing. see chapter g ofthe Administrative code for the office ofthe Hearing Examiner procedu res. Notice for Conditional Use petitions Neighborhood rnformation Meeting (NrM) Requirements: Appricant must conduct aNIM at least 15 days prior to the advertised pubric hearing. The NrM shaI be advertised and a mailed written notice shaI be given to the property owners in the notification area at least 15 days prior to the NIM meeting. Mailed Notice: written notice shall be sent to property owners in the notification area at least 15 days before the advertised public hearing. 3/17/2Ot7 COLLIER COUNW GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net LDC Section 10.03.05 B. or C. Chapter 8 of the Administrative Code Page 4 of 5 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 61 Attachment: Application / Backup Materials (8988 : Eagle Ready Mix Collier Batch) C.ouuty COtt|ER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 28OO NORTH HOR5ESHOE DRIVE NAPIES, FLORIOA 34104 12391252-24OO FN<: (239) 252-6358 Newspaper Advertisements: The legal advertisement shall be published at least 15 days before the advertised public hearing in a newspaper of general circulation. The advertisement shall include at a minimum:. Date, time, and location of the hearing; . Description ofthe proposed land uses; ando 2 in. x 3 in. map of the project location. Sign: A sign shall be posted at least 15 days before the advertised public hearing date. Public Hearing for Conditional Use Petitions Environmental Advisory Commiftee (EAC): The EAC shall hold at least l advertised public hearing, if required. Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC): The CCPC shall hold at least 1 public hearing. 3/77/2077 Page 5 of 5 Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA): The BZA shall hold at least 1 advertised public hearing. 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 62 Attachment: Application / Backup Materials (8988 : Eagle Ready Mix Collier Batch) DeBlasiisJohn Subject: Location: Start: End: Show Time As: P120170002361 (CU) Conference Room C Tue 7 /LL/20L7 L:30 PM rue 7 /lU20L7 2:30 PM Tentative Recurrence:(none) Meeting Status: Not yet responded Organizer: CDS-C Required AttendeesJohnsonEric; 'faleesha@jreeng.com'; AhmadVicky; AlcornChris; Amy Lockhart-Taylor; AnthonyDavid; ArnoldMichelle; AshtonHeidi; AuclairClaudine; BaluchStephen; BeardLaurie; BeasleyRachel; BrownAraqueSummer; BrownCraig; CascioGeorge; CondominaDanny; CrotteauKathynell; CrowleyMichaelle; David Ogilvie; DeBlasiisJohn; DeselemKay; dfey@northcollierfire.com; DumaisMike; FaulknerSue; FeyEric; FleishmanPaula; Gewirtzstorm; GiblinCormac; GosselinLiz; GundlachNancy; HouldsworthJohn; HughesJodi; Hu mphriesAlicia; JacobLisa;jnageond @sfwmd.gov; KendallMarcia; KulakPatricia; KurtzGerald; LenbergerSteve; LevyMichael; lmartin@sfwmd.gov; Louvierecarrett; Martinezoscar; MastrobertoThomas; MccaughtryMary; McKennaJack; McKuenElly; McLeanMatthew; MoscaMichele; MoxamAnnis; NawrockiStefanie; OrthRichard; pajerCraig; PatriciaKulak@colliergov.net; PattersonAmy; PepinEmily; pjimenez@sfwmd.gov; PochmaraNatalie; ReischlFred; RodriguezWanda; RomanDaniel; RosenblumBrett; SantabarbaraGino; SawyerMichael; ScottChris; ShawinskyPeter; Shawn Hanson; SheaBarbara; SmithCamden; SmithDaniel; Stonescott; StrainMark SuleckiAlexandra; SummersEllen; SweetChad; tamiscotU TempletonMark; VanLengenKris; VelascoJessica; WalshJonathan; WeeksDavid; WickhamFlannery; Willoughbychristine Planner: Eric Johnson Fire District: Greater Naples I 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 63 Attachment: Application / Backup Materials (8988 : Eagle Ready Mix Collier Batch) g e a E g $I IFI'FT I r,ll , II g t3E fr Hti E H E s:l L. I I s I":E' B-i.a. Iq t E g I q1trE t I I _t E Il 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 64 Attachment: Application / Backup Materials (8988 : Eagle Ready Mix Collier Batch) 1 ,i E r* ,- .l T:51 R: 27 S: 07 T: 51 R:27 rJ :t zoriiffg:I.e'l 7s i" 7 l"-^aIE-r-.1H1rjxtl\v 7 ,l t-: I I S: l8 T; 51 R: 27 (L Zoning: .TTRVC I oz =ulo uJtr ol =ll-t t'i I I I i 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 65 Attachment: Application / Backup Materials (8988 : Eagle Ready Mix Collier Batch) F f E 6Adt*sgQ $ E rtrH I II lnlIITIIL'l t ra t [1 f,I a ffi rc E I ET 9 E E A€tk€96 i.r I g I I HH l rl@ CMIIEfiEreEINIHE I HE ,i h F I II 9.A.1.ePacket Pg. 66Attachment: Application / Backup Materials (8988 : Eagle Ready Mix Collier Batch) CU-PL20170002361 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 67 Attachment: Application / Backup Materials (8988 : Eagle Ready Mix Collier Batch) CU-PL20170002361 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 68 Attachment: Application / Backup Materials (8988 : Eagle Ready Mix Collier Batch) $ 0 $ 0 $ 975,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 92,250 $ 0 $ 92,250 $ 92,250 $ 92,250 $ 92,250 Collier County Property AppraiserProperty Summary Parcel No.00763600006 Site Adr.15583 TAMIAMI TRL E, NAPLES, FL 34114 Name / Address HOLLINGSHEAD LAND LLC 4472 HICKORY GROVE ROAD City MURFREESBORO State TN Zip 37129-7447 Map No.Strap No.Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 6C18 000100 008 6C18 18 51 27 7.3 Legal 18 51 27 COMM NE CNR SEC 18, W 657.37FT POB, SLY 968.59FT, WLY 328.41FT, NLY 969FT, ELY 329FT POB 7.30 AC OR 752 PG 414*** Millage Area 223 Millage Rates *Calculations Sub./Condo 100 - ACREAGE HEADER School Other Total Use Code 99 - ACREAGE NOT ZONED AGRICULTURAL 5.245 6.258 11.503 Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) Date Book-Page Amount 05/15/17 5398-1425 05/15/17 5398-1424 04/28/17 5388-2052 04/27/17 5388-2046 10/03/02 3122-3402 07/08/02 3068-576 05/03/78 752-414 06/01/76 654-1859 2016 Certified Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Land Value (+) Improved Value (=) Market Value (=) Assessed Value (=) School Taxable Value (=) Taxable Value If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 69 Attachment: Application / Backup Materials (8988 : Eagle Ready Mix Collier Batch) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 70 Attachment: Application / Backup Materials (8988 : Eagle Ready Mix Collier Batch) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 71 Attachment: Application / Backup Materials (8988 : Eagle Ready Mix Collier Batch) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 72 Attachment: Application / Backup Materials (8988 : Eagle Ready Mix Collier Batch) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 73 Attachment: Application / Backup Materials (8988 : Eagle Ready Mix Collier Batch) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 74 Attachment: Application / Backup Materials (8988 : Eagle Ready Mix Collier Batch) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 75 Attachment: Application / Backup Materials (8988 : Eagle Ready Mix Collier Batch) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 76 Attachment: Application / Backup Materials (8988 : Eagle Ready Mix Collier Batch) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 77 Attachment: Application / Backup Materials (8988 : Eagle Ready Mix Collier Batch) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 78 Attachment: Application / Backup Materials (8988 : Eagle Ready Mix Collier Batch) ZONED: INDUSTRIALZONED: AGRICULTURAL MATERIALPROCESSING &BUILDING AREAMATERIAL TESTING &STORAGE AREAEQUIPMENTPARKING AREA10' TYPE "A" BUFFER5' TYPE "A" BUFFER ZONED: AGRICULTURAL ZONED: INDUSTRIALZONED: AGRICULTURALZONED: INDUSTRIAL ZONED: AGRICULTURAL ZONED: AGRICULTURALPROJECT ACCESSWATER MANAGEMENTAREA30.0'MIN BLDGSETBACKVEHICULAR PARKINGMATERIAL STORAGE30.0'ROADWAYESMTPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTYLINE10' TYPE"A" BUFFER30.0'MIN BLDGSETBACK479.5' MIN PROVIDED BLDG SETBACKPROPERTY LINE240.0' MIN PROVIDED BLDG SETBACK 296.0' 288.4'SWALE TO BE PROVIDED ASNECESSARY AT PROPERTYBOUNDARY TO ALLOWCONVEYANCE OF OFF-SITEFLOWSSWALE TO BE PROVIDED AS NECESSARY AT PROPERTYBOUNDARY TO ALLOW CONVEYANCE OF OFF-SITE FLOWS10' TYPE "A" BUFFER 10' TYPE "A" BUFFER10' TYPE "A" BUFFER 10' TYPE "A" BUFFER FILE DATE:SMYRNA READY MIXEAST TRAIL PLANTMASTER CONCEPT PLANSHEET:J.R. EVANS ENGINEERING, P.A.9351 CORKSCREW ROAD, SUITE 102ESTERO, FLORIDA 33928PHONE: (239) 405-9148FAX: (239) 288-2537WWW.JREVANSENGINEERING.COM108/201700120'60'SCALE: 1" = 120'NP:\Land 2015\259. Eagle Ready Mix\25916-01 Collier Batch Plant\01 Drawings\Exhibits\Master Concept Plan\25916-01-MCP-(2019-03-22).dwg CHRISTOPHER R. MITCHELL P.E.FL. LICENSE NO. 56740FL. COA # 29226#DATE11/08/17REVISED PER COUNTY COMMENTS1REVISIONS111DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONSREARREQUIRED50'**SETBACKFRONT25'*SIDE30'**479.5'240.0'30.0'*SETBACK REQUIREMENTS BASED ON BASE ZONING(INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT).**SETBACK REQUIREMENTS BASED ON RFMUO-RECEIVINGLANDS DISTRICT PER LDC 2.03.08 A.2.a.(4)(a)2PROJECT SUMMARYLAND USEIMPERVIOUSBUILDINGSPAVEMENTTOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA1,200 SF49,208 SF152,619 SFPERVIOUS0.03 AC1.13 AC3.50 AC0.4 %15.5 %48.0 %OPEN SPACE76,896 SFTOTAL SITE AREA318,325 SF1.77 AC7.31 AC24.1 %100 %STABILIZED MATERIAL102,211 SF2.34 AC32.1 %RETENTION AREA88,810 SF2.04 AC27.9 %111102/26/182REVISED PER COUNTY COMMENTS2222222NATIVE PRESERVATION NOTES1.NO NATIVE VEGETATION ONSITE AND THEREFORE NO PRESERVE IS REQUIRED2LEGENDPROPERTY AREA NOT SUBJECT TO CONDITIONALUSE REQUIREMENTS. PROPOSED USE ALLOWEDWITHIN THE INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT.PROPERTY AREA SUBJECT TO CONDITIONAL USEREQUIREMENTSCONCEPTUALPROVIDED333310/17/183REVISED PER COUNTY COMMENTS01/03/194REVISED PER COUNTY COMMENTS4403/22/195REVISED PER COUNTY COMMENTS555J.R.ENGINEERINGEVANS9.A.1.ePacket Pg. 79Attachment: Application / Backup Materials (8988 : Eagle Ready Mix Collier Batch) SUMMARY OF NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATIONAL MEETING Eagle Ready Mix Collier Batch Plant (CU), PL20170002361 February 27, 2019 at 5:30 p.m. at Rookery Bay Environmental Learning Center The meeting started at 5:30 pm with a presentation of the Conditional Use application by Daniel DeLisi. DeLisi described the property location and zoning The property access Chris Mitchell, project engineer, described the use Mr. Casantino asked if the Cemex plant that is nearby is the same thing. Mitchell answered that it is. Pat Rodinski asked if the batch plant is the only use that can go on the site. Kevin Eisenbath and DeLisi answered that the property is limited to what is in the application without going back through the process. Pat Rodinski asked if we can have a condition that this is only concrete. The applicant said they would look into it. Rodinski stated that with the limitation of concrete they are ok with the application. Gil Martinez, Collier County clarified that they application is for a single specific use that can be conditioned. Paul Rodinski asked about noise protection. Casantino asked for limits on hours of operation. Rodinski is concerned about noise from operations, not hours for maintenance and ancillary office. Mr. Martinez reviewed the process moving forward. Mr. Mitchell answered a question on how quickly the project could move forward. 4-12 months. 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 80 Attachment: Application / Backup Materials (8988 : Eagle Ready Mix Collier Batch) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 81 Attachment: Application / Backup Materials (8988 : Eagle Ready Mix Collier Batch) SMYRNA READY MIX EAST TRAIL PLANT Rezoning Environmental Information (February 2018) The Smyrna Ready Mix East Trail Plant property is 7.31± acres in size. Based on historical aerials, this property and the surrounding lands had been cleared and were being used for row crops and/or cattle pasture prior to 1980 (see attached undated historic aerial). By 1980 excavation of the agricultural fields within this property had been initiated and by 1985 the vast majority of the property was excavated. The southern portion of the site was either not excavated or was excavated and then back filled by 1985. Some additional backfilling appears to have occurred in the 1990’s Currently the previously excavated portion of the site is vegetated by willow. Brazilian pepper is present along the edge of the old pit. Ground cover species include para grass, cattail, primrose willow, and water-hyacinth. This area appears to be inundated by more than three feet of water during the wet season. Please see the attached Vegetation Map and Protected Species Assessment for a discussion of the current site conditions. Based on email communications with Ms. Summer Araque (copy attached), the site does not contain any native vegetation. Bald eagle nest CO-037 is located approximately 580 feet west of the northern portion of the property. As shown on the attached map, approximately 0.59 acres of the subject property is located within the 660 feet buffer zone. The vast majority of the property within the 660 feet buffer zone will consist of a perimeter berm and water management facility. The land between the property and the eagle nest is densely vegetated by mature Brazilian pepper and therefore it is unlikely that the construction and operation of the proposed facility will impact the bald eagles. The applicant will coordinate with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) during the federal permitting of this project and will implement protective measures (if any) as required by the FWS. Craig M. Smith of W. Dexter Bender & Associates, Inc. prepared the Protected Species Assessment. Mr. Smith has been employed as a full time environmental consultant in southwest Florida since 1987. A copy of his credentials is attached. Y:\EAGLE-1\County Zoning\Feb 2018\County Zoning Info.Docx 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 82 Attachment: Application / Backup Materials (8988 : Eagle Ready Mix Collier Batch) 9.A.1.ePacket Pg. 83Attachment: Application / Backup Materials (8988 : Eagle Ready Mix Collier Batch) 9.A.1.ePacket Pg. 84Attachment: Application / Backup Materials (8988 : Eagle Ready Mix Collier Batch) SMYRNA READY MIX EAST TRAIL PLANT Section 18, Township 51 South, Range 27 East Collier County, Florida Protected Species Assessment July 2017 Prepared for: Eagle Ready Mix, LLC 16576 Gator RD Fort Myers, FL 33912 Prepared by: W. Dexter Bender & Associates, Inc. 4470 Camino Real Way, Suite 101 Fort Myers, FL 33966 (239) 334-3680 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 85 Attachment: Application / Backup Materials (8988 : Eagle Ready Mix Collier Batch) 1 INTRODUCTION The 7.31± acre parcel is located within a portion of Section 18, Township 51 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida. The lands to the north of the site appear to have been excavated prior to 1980. The land to the east consists of fallow farm field and commercial development. An auto salvage yard is present to the south. Additional fallow farm field is present to the west. SITE CONDITIONS Based on historical aerials, this property and the surrounding lands had been cleared and were being used for row crops and/or cattle pasture prior to 1980. By 1980 excavation of the agricultural fields within this property had been initiated and by 1985 the vast majority of the property was excavated. The southern portion of the site was either not excavated or was excavated and then back filled by 1985. Some additional backfilling appears to have occurred in the 1990’s. VEGETATIVE CLASSIFICATIONS The predominant vegetation associations were mapped in the field on 2017 digital 1” = 100’ scale aerial photography. The property boundary was obtained from Rhodes and Rhodes Land Surveying, Inc. and inserted into the digital aerial. Five vegetation associations were identified using the Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCCS). Figure 1 depicts the approximate location and configuration of these vegetation associations and Table 1 summarizes the acreages by FLUCCS Code. A brief description of each FLUCCS Code is also provided below. Table 1. Acreage Summary by FLUCCS Code FLUCCS CODE DESCRIPTION ACREAGE 618E3 Willow Invaded by Exotics (51 – 75%) 5.55 740 Disturbed Land 1.61 740H Hydric Disturbed Land 0.08 742 Borrow Areas 0.07 Total 7.31 FLUCCS Code 618E3, Willow Invaded by Exotics (51 – 75%) Most of the site consists of a willow (Salix caroliniana) dominated wetland that has become established within the excavated area. Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolius) is present along the edge of the wetland. Ground cover species observed include para grass (Urochloa mutica), cattail (Typha sp.), primrose willow (Ludwigia peruviana), and water-hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes). This area appears to be inundated by more than three feet of water during the wet season. Rock, construction debris, and concrete were also observed along the edges of this area. 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 86 Attachment: Application / Backup Materials (8988 : Eagle Ready Mix Collier Batch) 9.A.1.ePacket Pg. 87Attachment: Application / Backup Materials (8988 : Eagle Ready Mix Collier Batch) 3 FLUCCS Code 740, Disturbed Land The southern portion of the site has been significantly disturbed and is dominated by exotic and weedy species. Australian pine (Casuarina equisetifolia), lead tree (Leucaena leucocephala), air potato (Dioscorea bulbifera), and Brazilian pepper are common around the edges of the field. The remainder of the field is vegetated by species such as castor bean (Ricinus communis), flatsedges (Cyperus spp.), whitehead broom (Spermacoce verticillata), wedelia (Wedelia trilobata), and morning glory (Ipomoea sp.). FLUCCS Code 740H, Hydric Disturbed Land A small area of disturbed wetland is located in the southwest corner of the site. This area contained scattered willow saplings, flatsedges, dayflower (Commelina diffusa), wedelia, and foxtail grass (Setaria sp.). FLUCCS Code 742/743, Borrow Areas/ Spoil Areas Several small excavated cells surrounded by narrow filled berms are present near the east property line. The cells are vegetated by willow. SURVEY METHOD Based on the general habitat types (FLUCCS Codes) identified on-site there is a very low potential for a limited number of species listed as endangered, threatened, or species of special concern by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) or the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) to potentially occur on the subject parcel. These species include gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus), American alligator (Alligator mississippiensis), eastern indigo snake (Drymarchon corais couperi), a variety of wading birds, and Florida panther (Felis concolor coryi). The bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), which has been delisted by the FWC and FWS, is still protected by other regulations and was therefore included in the survey. The Florida black bear (Ursus americanus floridanus), delisted in 2012, is still protected by the Florida Black Bear Management Plan and was therefore included in the survey. Please see Table 2 for additional listed species included in the survey. In addition, per Collier County regulations three species of orchids (Cyrtopodium punctatum, Encyclia cochleata, and E. tampensis) and four species of wild pine (Tillandsia fasciculata, T. utriculata, T. balbisiana, and T. flexuosa) which could potentially occur on-site were included in the survey. In order to comply with FWC/FWS survey methodology guidelines, each habitat type was surveyed for the occurrence of the species listed above using meandering pedestrian belt transects. Observations for listed species were made during specific protected species survey events. The meandering pedestrian belt transects were spaced approximately 50 feet apart in the disturbed uplands and 65± feet apart in the willow dominated wetlands. The approximate location of direct sighting or sign (such as tracks, nests, and droppings) of a listed species, when observed, was denoted on the aerial photography. The 1" = 100’ scale aerial Protected Species Assessment map (Figure 1) depicts the approximate location of the survey transects and the results of the survey. The listed species survey 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 88 Attachment: Application / Backup Materials (8988 : Eagle Ready Mix Collier Batch) 4 was conducted during the mid-day hours of November 2, 2016 in the disturbed uplands and on May 30, 2017 for the wetlands. Prior to conducting the protected species survey, a search of the FWC listed species database (updated in June 2016) was conducted to determine the known occurrence of listed species in the project area. This search revealed no known protected species occurring on or immediately adjacent to the site. According to the FWC listed species occurrence database the property is located within the FWS designated Core Foraging Area of a wood stork (Myrcteria americana) colony (Figure 2). The database indicated that a bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) nest (Nest Number CO-037) is present approximately 580 feet west of the property’s northwest corner (Figure 2). The bald eagle was removed from the Endangered Species Act (delisted) by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) in August 2007. The Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) also delisted the bald eagle at the state level in April 2008. However, both the FWS and the FWC continue to regulate development activities in the vicinity of bald eagle nests. In addition, the property is located within the secondary zone of the 2007 Florida Panther Focus Area identified by the FWS. The Florida panther (Felis concolor coryi) is listed as endangered by both the FWS and FWC. Florida panther telemetry points for cat number 193 have been recorded within 100± feet of the property between 2011 and 2015. Florida black bear have been recorded east of the property. Table 2. Listed Species That Could Potentially Occur On-site FLUCCS CODE Percent Survey Coverage Species Name Present Absent 618E3 80 American Alligator (Alligator mississippiensis) Little Blue Heron (Egretta caerulea) Reddish Egret (Egretta rufescens) Snowy Egret (Egretta thula) Tricolored Heron (Egretta tricolor) Wood Stork (Mycteria americana) Florida Black Bear (Ursus americanus floridanus) Florida Panther (Felis concolor coryi) √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ 740 80 Gopher Tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) √ 740H 80 None 742 80 None SURVEY RESULTS No species listed by either the FWS or the FWC were observed on the site during the protected species survey. No potential Florida bonneted bat (Eumpos floridanus) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 89 Attachment: Application / Backup Materials (8988 : Eagle Ready Mix Collier Batch) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 90 Attachment: Application / Backup Materials (8988 : Eagle Ready Mix Collier Batch) 6 potential cavity trees or other roosting structures are present on-site. None of the orchids or wild pine species listed by Collier County were observed. In addition to the site inspection, a search of the FWC species database (updated in June 2016) revealed no known protected species within or immediately adjacent to the project limits. Y:\EAGLE-1\PSA.docx 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 91 Attachment: Application / Backup Materials (8988 : Eagle Ready Mix Collier Batch) 1 Craig Smith From:BrownAraqueSummer <SummerBrownAraque@colliergov.net> Sent:Wednesday, August 02, 2017 11:46 AM To:Craig Smith Cc:AnthonyDavid; BrownCraig Subject:RE: Concrete Batch Plant on US 41, Pre-Application Meeting 20170002361 Attachments:Historic Aerial.pdf; Vegetation Map.pdf With the information you have provided, the site does not contain any native vegetation. Regards, Summer B. Araque Principal Environmental Specialist Environmental Planning Section Supervisor Development Review Division Phone: 239‐252‐6290 How are we doing? Please CLICK HERE to fill out a Customer Survey. We appreciate your Feedback! From: Craig Smith [mailto:csmith@dexbender.com] Sent: Monday, July 31, 2017 1:59 PM To: BrownAraqueSummer <SummerBrownAraque@colliergov.net> Cc: AnthonyDavid <DavidAnthony@colliergov.net> Subject: RE: Concrete Batch Plant on US 41, Pre‐Application Meeting 20170002361 Summer: The primrose willow is Ludwigia peruviana. Craig M. Smith, M.S., P.W.S. Senior Ecologist DexBender 4470 Camino Real Way, Suite 101 Fort Myers, FL 33966 Office: (239)334‐3680 Cell: (239)470‐2812 From: BrownAraqueSummer [mailto:SummerBrownAraque@colliergov.net] Sent: Monday, July 31, 2017 1:56 PM To: Craig Smith <csmith@dexbender.com> Cc: AnthonyDavid <DavidAnthony@colliergov.net> Subject: RE: Concrete Batch Plant on US 41, Pre‐Application Meeting 20170002361 Hi Craig, What specific Primrose Willow? I will take a look at the code and discuss with the team to provide feedback on whether the 618E3 area would be considered native. 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 92 Attachment: Application / Backup Materials (8988 : Eagle Ready Mix Collier Batch) 2 Regards, Summer B. Araque Principal Environmental Specialist Environmental Planning Section Supervisor Development Review Division Phone: 239‐252‐6290 How are we doing? Please CLICK HERE to fill out a Customer Survey. We appreciate your Feedback! From: Craig Smith [mailto:csmith@dexbender.com] Sent: Monday, July 31, 2017 1:29 PM To: BrownAraqueSummer <SummerBrownAraque@colliergov.net> Cc: AnthonyDavid <DavidAnthony@colliergov.net> Subject: Concrete Batch Plant on US 41, Pre‐Application Meeting 20170002361 Summer: I will be working on the environmental portions of the conditional use application for this project but was unable to attend the pre‐application meeting. Based on historical aerials, this 7.3 acre property and the surrounding lands had been cleared and were being used for row crops and/or cattle pasture prior to 1980. By 1980 excavation of the agricultural fields within this property had been initiated and by 1985 the vast majority of the property was excavated. The southern portion of the site was either not excavated or was excavated and then back filled by 1985. Some additional backfilling appears to have occurred in the 1990’s. I have attached an old aerial and a current Vegetation Map of the site. Currently the previously excavated portion of the site is vegetated by willow. Brazilian pepper is present along the edge of the old pit. Ground cover species include para grass, cattail, primrose willow, and water‐hyacinth. This area appears to be inundated by more than three feet of water during the wet season. I discussed this site with David Anthony awhile back to get his thoughts on whether the willow dominated excavated area would be considered as "native vegetation" by the County. He seemed to think that it might not (i.e. it is an overgrown pit and not a natural system) but since at that time we were considering rezoning to industrial, no preserve would be required due to the small size of the overall project. Please give me a call to discuss. Thanks. Craig M. Smith, M.S., P.W.S. Senior Ecologist DexBender 4470 Camino Real Way, Suite 101 Fort Myers, FL 33966 Office: (239)334‐3680 Cell: (239)470‐2812 Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 93 Attachment: Application / Backup Materials (8988 : Eagle Ready Mix Collier Batch) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 94 Attachment: Application / Backup Materials (8988 : Eagle Ready Mix Collier Batch) Current Responsibilities Project Manager providing an array of environmental studies and services related to land development and property evaluation in south Florida. These activities, performed for private landowners and public entities, include vegetation mapping, binding and informal state and federal wetland jurisdictional determinations, wetland functional assessments using UMAM, WRAP, and MWRAP, habitat evaluations, establishing seasonal high water elevations for wetlands using biological indicators, threatened and endangered species surveys, and wetland (COE, DEP, and SFWMD) permit applications. Additional services include threatened and endangered species relocation and management plans, wetland mitigation (creation, restoration, enhancement, and preservation) plans, and the design and implementation of wetland monitoring plans. Experience Joined the firm in 2003 bringing over 16 years of experience as an environmental consultant in South Florida. More than 275,000 acres of land has been mapped and evaluated since 1987. Mapping includes detailed macrophyte community mapping, more general plant community mapping of wetlands and uplands, and the mapping of current and historic conditions based on photo interpretation. Individual properties ranged in size from less than one acre to more than 5,000 acres located in Collier, Lee, Charlotte, Sarasota, Hardee, and Polk Counties. Projects have included agricultural, residential, commercial, and industrial land uses, new and expanding roadways, and wetland restoration (wetland mitigation banking). Wetland permitting experience includes wetland delineation, preparation of state and federal permit applications and supporting documents, responding to agency questions and third party concerns, and negotiating mutually acceptable wetland mitigation plans. Surveys and management plans have been conducted and prepared for gopher tortoises, eastern indigo snake, bald eagle, red-cockaded woodpecker, Florida bonneted bat, and Big Cypress fox squirrel. Has authorization from the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission to conduct surveys, prepare permit applications, and relocate gopher tortoises as an Authorized Gopher Tortoise Agent. Is qualified as an expert witness by the Lee County Hearing Examiner, Collier County Environmental Advisory Council, Collier County Planning Commission, and City of Bonita Springs Zoning Board, Village of Estero Zoning Board on environmental issues. Craig M. Smith, Senior Ecologist 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 95 Attachment: Application / Backup Materials (8988 : Eagle Ready Mix Collier Batch) Recently completed and ongoing projects for the public and private sectors include monitoring of the Lely Area Stormwater Improvement Project mitigation park, wetland permitting and wetland enhancement plan development, implementation, and monitoring for Barrington Cove, Marsilea, Hadley Place, and Verona Pointe Estates in Collier County, and bald eagle management plan preparation for the Calusa Cay CPD, Mockingbird Crossing, Palms at Cape Coral, and the Winkler 10 Acre RPD. Education and Certification Master of Science, University of North Carolina at Wilmington, 1987. Bachelor of Science, Clarion University of Pennsylvania, 1984. Senior Ecologist, Ecological Society of America Professional Wetland Scientist (No. 238), Society of Wetland Scientists Certified Arborist (No. FL-6255A), International Society of Arboriculture Authorized Gopher Tortoise Agent (Permit No. GTA-09-00011E), Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Qualified Bald Eagle Monitor, City of Cape Coral Provisionally Certified Wetland Delineator, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Certification Program, 1993. Continuing Education Florida Master Naturalist Program – Freshwater Wetlands. University of Florida IFAS, 2012. Native Trees, Shrubs, and wildflowers for Central and South Florida: Zones 9-11. Florida Association of Native Nurseries. 2011. Unified Mitigation Assessment Method 201 Training. South Florida Water Management District. 2010. Florida Statewide (62-340 FAC) Wetland Delineation Training Program. Richard Chinn Environmental Training, Inc. 2007. Wetland Plant Identification Training Program. Richard Chinn Environmental Training, Inc. 2007. Unified Mitigation Assessment Method Training. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 2005. The Florida Master Wildlifer. University of Florida. Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences. 2003. Basic Prescribed Fire Training. Hillsborough Community College. 1992. Florida Wetlands Successful Creation, Restoration, and Enhancement Training Course #1. Natural Resources Training and Certification, Inc. 1991. Florida Hydric Soils Workshop. Florida Association of Professional Soil Classifiers. 1991. Affiliations Ecological Society of America Society of Wetland Scientists 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 96 Attachment: Application / Backup Materials (8988 : Eagle Ready Mix Collier Batch) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 3/17/2017 Page 7 of 14 STATEMENT OF UTILITY PROVISIONS FOR CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST APPLICANT INFORMATION Name of Applicant(s): ___________________________________________________________ Address: ______________________________City: ___________ State: ________ ZIP: _______ Telephone: ____________________ Cell: _____________________ Fax: __________________ E-Mail Address: ________________________________________________________________ Address of Subject Property (If available): ___________________________________________ City: ________________ State: __________ ZIP: ___________ LEGAL DESCRIPTION Section/Township/Range: / / Lot: Block: Subdivision: _______________________________________________ Plat Book: Page #: Property I.D. Number: _________________________________ Metes & Bounds Description: _____________________________________________________ TYPE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL TO BE PROVIDED Check applicable system: a. County Utility System b. City Utility System c. Franchised Utility System Provide Name: ____________________ d. Package Treatment Plant (GPD Capacity): ___________________ e. Septic System TYPE OF WATER SERVICE TO BE PROVIDED a. County Utility System b. City Utility System c. Franchised Utility System PROVIDE NAME_______________ d. Private System (Well) Total Population to be served: ____________________________________________________ Peak and Average Daily Demands: A. Water-Peak: _______ Average Daily: ________ B. Sewer-Peak: _______ Average Daily: ________ 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 97 Attachment: Application / Backup Materials (8988 : Eagle Ready Mix Collier Batch) 9.A.1.ePacket Pg. 98Attachment: Application / Backup Materials (8988 : Eagle Ready Mix Collier Batch) 06/06/2019 COLLIER COUNTY Collier County Planning Commission Item Number: 9.A.2 Item Summary: PL20180002619: An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida amending Ordinance No. 95-74, the Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club Planned Unit Development; by revising the master plan to reduce the preserve tract by 2.90 acres and add 2.90 acres as a recreation area for the relocation of the tennis center within Tract A, just north of Naples Heritage Drive; and providing an effective date. The subject property, consisting of 558± acres, is located south of Davis Boulevard and west of Collier Boulevard in Sections 3, 4, 9 And 10, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: Gil Martinez, Principal Planner. ] Meeting Date: 06/06/2019 Prepared by: Title: – Zoning Name: Gilbert Martinez 05/21/2019 8:59 AM Submitted by: Title: Division Director - Planning and Zoning – Zoning Name: Michael Bosi 05/21/2019 8:59 AM Approved By: Review: Growth Management Operations & Regulatory Management Judy Puig Review item Completed 05/21/2019 11:38 AM Zoning Ray Bellows Review Item Completed 05/21/2019 5:40 PM Zoning Michael Bosi Review item Completed 05/22/2019 7:59 AM Zoning Camden Smith Review Item Completed 05/22/2019 8:46 AM Growth Management Operations & Regulatory Management Donna Guitard Review Item Completed 05/22/2019 9:27 AM Growth Management Department James C French Review Item Completed 05/24/2019 10:36 AM Zoning Michael Bosi Review Item Completed 05/28/2019 10:02 AM Planning Commission Mark Strain Meeting Pending 06/06/2019 9:00 AM 9.A.2 Packet Pg. 99 PUDA-PL20180002619, Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club PUD Page 1 of 13 June 6, 2019 STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: ZONING DIVISION – ZONING SERVICES SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING DATE: JUNE 6, 2019 SUBJECT: PETITION NO: PUDA-PL20180002619 – NAPLES HERITAGE GOLF AND COUNTRY CLUB PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) PROPERTY OWNER/AGENT: Applicant: Agent: Naples Heritage Golf 7 Country Club, Inc. Kenneth Gaynor, President 8150 Heritage Club Way, Naples, Fl 34112 Gina R. Green, P.E. 3310 1st Avenue North West Naples, FL 34120 REQUESTED ACTION: The petitioner is requesting that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) consider an application to amend Ordinance No. 95-74, the Naples Heritage Golf & Country (PUD). GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property is located within Tract A, North of Naples Heritage Drive, West of the driving range, in Sections 3, 4, 9 and 10, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 555.8 +/- acres. (see location map, page 2). PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The petitioner is requesting to amend the Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club (PUD), approved via Ordinance #95-74 by amending the PUD Master Plan to allow for the revision of the master plan to reduce the preserve tract by 2.90 acres and add 2.90 acres as a recreation area for the relocation of the tennis center within Tract A, just north of Naples Heritage Drive. 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 100 Attachment: Naples Heritage Golf & Country Club Staff Report (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) PUDA-PL20180002619, Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club PUD Page 2 of 13 June 6, 2019 9.A.2.aPacket Pg. 101Attachment: Naples Heritage Golf & Country Club Staff Report (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country PUDA-PL20180002619, Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club PUD Page 3 of 13 June 6, 2019 SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING: This section of the staff report identifies the land uses and zoning classifications for properties surrounding the boundaries of the Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club PUD. North: Land Use; Conservation Easement. Zoned; PUD East: Land Use; Golf Course. Zoned; PUD South: Land Use; Naples Heritage Drive, Conservation Easement. Zoned; PUD West: Land Use; Conservation Easement. Zoned; PUD c Subject Site 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 102 Attachment: Naples Heritage Golf & Country Club Staff Report (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) PUDA-PL20180002619, Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club PUD Page 4 of 13 June 6, 2019 GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY: The GMP is the prevailing document to support land use decisions, such as this proposed rezoning. Staff is required to make a recommendation regarding a finding of consistency or inconsistency with the overall GMP as part of the recommendation for approval, approval with conditions, or denial of any rezoning petition. This petition is consistent with the GMP. Future Land Use Element (FLUE): Staff identified the FLUE policies relevant to this project and determined that the proposed amendment to the PUD may be deemed consistent with the FLUE of the GMP. Please, see Attachment B – FLUE Consistency Review for a more detailed analysis of how staff derived this determination. Transportation Element: No transportation-related issues. Transportation review is not applicable. Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME): The petition is consistent with the applicable provisions of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME) of the GMP. The PUD requires retention of a minimum of 195.23 (35%) acres of existing native vegetation. The existing preserve is 248 acres, and the applicant is requesting a reduction of 2.9 acres to reduce the preserve amount to 245.1 acres that will remain under preservation and dedicated to Collier County. STAFF ANALYSIS: Staff has completed a comprehensive evaluation of this land use petition, including the criteria upon which a recommendation must be based, specifically noted in LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5, Planning Commission Recommendation (commonly referred to as the “PUD Findings”), and Section 10.02.08.F, Nature of Requirements of Planning Commission Report (referred to as “Rezone Findings”), which establish the legal basis to support the CCPC’s recommendation. An evaluation relative to these subsections is discussed below, under the heading “Zoning Services Analysis.” Drainage: Drainage modifications resulting from this PUD Amendment are internal to the developments Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) and will not impact the County’s drainage systems. Modifications to the development’s drainage system will be reviewed and approved by the District and Collier County GMD staff during the site development process. Environmental Review: Environmental Planning staff has reviewed the PUDA petition for the environmental components of the project. A minimum of 195.23 acres (35%) of native vegetation are required to be retained for the PUD. The existing PUD Master Plan provides 248 acres of Preserve. The request is to change 2.9 acres of preserve to golf course (248 – 2.9 acres of existing preserve = 245.1 acres of remaining preserve). The proposed PUD Master Plan provides 245.1 acres of Preserve, which meets the minimum 35% preservation requirement in accordance with LDC section 3.05.07. Stiff-leaved wild-pines (Tillandsia fasciculata) observed in the area to be vacated are required to be relocated into preserves in accordance with LDC section 3.04.03; no listed species were observed on the property. Landscape Review: No new landscape deviations are being requested. Landscape review is not applicable. 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 103 Attachment: Naples Heritage Golf & Country Club Staff Report (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) PUDA-PL20180002619, Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club PUD Page 5 of 13 June 6, 2019 School District: The Collier County School District does not have any issue with the proposed amendment as it will not impact the District’s level of service. Transportation Review: No transportation-related issues. Transportation review is not applicable. Utilities Review: Review was not applicable since the proposed amendment involved an expansion of the amenity site (i.e., no impact to public utilities). Zoning Services Analysis: The Naples Heritage Golf & Country Club is proposing to Amend the PUD Master Plan to convert 2.90 acres of Preservation Area to Golf Course/Recreational area. The Clubhouse at Naples Heritage proposes to relocate their tennis facility to this site from the main clubhouse site so that they can renovate their clubhouse amenities and create additional parking for the clubhouse to alleviate parking issues that occur during the seasonal months when the population of the club is at its maximum. It is important to note this petition is contingent on approval of a petition for a Vacation of Easement PL20190000439 which is scheduled to be heard by the Board of County Commissioner on June 11, 2019. The following is a summary for the necessity and benefits of the accompanying Vacation of Easement: According to the plat, Tract C1, a Conservation and Buffer Easement, was dedicated to the County without maintenance responsibility, and dedicated to Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club, Inc., with maintenance responsibility. According to the Quit-Claim Deed dated January 8, 1999, recorded in O.R. Book 2507, Page 2235, Naples Heritage Community Development District is fee simple owner of the subject property. The Naples Heritage Golf & Country Club is proposing to vacate a portion of Tract C-1 of the Naples Heritage Golf & Country Club Phase One Plat in order to relocate their tennis center facility from the main clubhouse campus. Due to changes over the past 20 years for this Club, the demographics of the members have changed, and the main clubhouse campus can no longer provide the space needed to accommodate all the activities that are available for the members. When the project was built in the late 1990s, golf was the primary amenity at the club. Present day demographic is more active and plays tennis, uses the fitness center and the swimming pool more than when the club was constructed. This has created a parking issue during the seasonal months at the club. The tennis center has seen a 500% increase in participation. The relocation of this tennis center will allow the club to continue to provide all its amenities and alleviate a parking issue during the season at the clubhouse. This parking issue has been witnessed by the local fire department, and they have spoken to the club about the issue and the need for it to be addressed. The public benefit of vacating this conservation and Buffer easement to allow the relocation of the tennis center, which would alleviate the parking issues on the clubhouse site. Removing the tennis center would allow the addition of 69 spaces to the clubhouse site for a total of 262 spaces. The new tennis center would also have 20 spaces and golf cart parking at its new facility, which is adjacent to the existing driving range. This would alleviate the safety concerns of the parking of cars along the club entry drive which hinders first responders when there is a call to the site. 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 104 Attachment: Naples Heritage Golf & Country Club Staff Report (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) PUDA-PL20180002619, Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club PUD Page 6 of 13 June 6, 2019 (Intentionally Blank) 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 105 Attachment: Naples Heritage Golf & Country Club Staff Report (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) PUDA-PL20180002619, Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club PUD Page 7 of 13 June 6, 2019 9.A.2.aPacket Pg. 106Attachment: Naples Heritage Golf & Country Club Staff Report (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country PUDA-PL20180002619, Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club PUD Page 8 of 13 June 6, 2019 PUD FINDINGS: LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5 states that “In support of its recommendation, the CCPC shall make findings as to the PUD Master Plan’s compliance with the following criteria in addition to the findings in LDC Section 10.02.08”: 1. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. Staff has reviewed the proposed amendment and believes the uses and property development regulations are compatible with the development approved in the area. The commitments made by the applicant and staff’s recommended stipulations should provide adequate assurances that the proposed change should not adversely affect living conditions in the area. 2. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contracts, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Documents submitted with the application were reviewed by the County Attorney’s Office and demonstrate unified control of the property. 3. Conformity of the proposed Planned Unit Development with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). County staff has reviewed this petition and has offered an analysis of conformity with the relevant goals, objectives, and policies of the GMP within the GMP Consistency portion of this staff report on pages 4. 4. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. As described in the Staff Analysis section of this staff report, no new landscape deviations are being requested. Staff recommends approval. 5. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. The usable open space areas are increasing; therefore, no deviation from the required usable open space is being requested, and compliance would be demonstrated at the time of SDP or PPL. 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 107 Attachment: Naples Heritage Golf & Country Club Staff Report (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) PUDA-PL20180002619, Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club PUD Page 9 of 13 June 6, 2019 6. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of ensuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. The roadway infrastructure is sufficient to serve the proposed project, as noted in the consistency review. Finally, the project’s development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals are sought, including but not limited to any plats and site development plans. 7. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. The area has the adequate supporting infrastructure, including Collier County Water-Sewer District potable water and wastewater mains, to accommodate this project based upon the commitments made by the petitioner, and the fact that adequate public facilities requirements will continuously be addressed when development approvals are sought. 8. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. All future development proposed on the Naples Heritage Golf & Country Club PUD would have to comply to the LDC and other applicable codes. The petitioner is not requesting any deviations from the LDC. Rezone Findings: LDC Subsection 10.02.08.F states, “When pertaining to the rezoning of land, the report and recommendations to the planning commission to the Board of County Commissioners…shall show that the planning commission has studied and considered proposed change in relation to the following when applicable”: 1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Future Land Use Map and the elements of the GMP. Comprehensive Planning staff determined the subject petition is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the (FLUM) and other elements of the GMP. 2. The existing land use pattern. The existing land use pattern (of the abutting properties) is described in the Surrounding Land Use and Zoning section of this staff report. The proposed use would not change the existing land use patterns of the surrounding properties. 3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. The property is currently zoned PUD and would remain as such. 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 108 Attachment: Naples Heritage Golf & Country Club Staff Report (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) PUDA-PL20180002619, Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club PUD Page 10 of 13 June 6, 2019 4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. This petition does not propose any change to the boundaries of the PUD. The Master Plan would be updated by relabeling the subject property. 5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed rezoning necessary. Yes. Due to demographic changes, the requested rezoning will allow the club to continue to provide all its amenities and alleviate a parking issue during peak season at the clubhouse. The current condition has exasperated a parking issue that has been witnessed by the local fire department, and they have spoken to the club about the issue and the need for it to be addressed. 6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. The proposed PUD Amendment is not anticipated to adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. 7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety. The roadway infrastructure is sufficient to serve the proposed project, as noted in the Transportation Element consistency review. Finally, the project’s development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals, including but not limited to any plats and or site development plans, are sought. 8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem. The proposed PUD Amendment request is not anticipated to create drainage problems in the area, provided stormwater best management practices, treatment, and storage on this project will be addressed through Environmental Resource Permitting (ERP) with the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD). County staff will evaluate the project’s stormwater management system, calculations, and design criteria at time of SDP and/or PPL. 9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas. It is not anticipated the changes proposed to this PUD Amendment would seriously reduce light or air to the adjacent areas. 10. Whether the proposed change will adversely affect property values in the adjacent areas. This is a subjective determination based upon anticipated results, which may be internal or external to the subject property. Property valuation is affected by a host of factors including zoning; however, zoning by itself may or may not affect values, since value determination is driven by market value. 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 109 Attachment: Naples Heritage Golf & Country Club Staff Report (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) PUDA-PL20180002619, Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club PUD Page 11 of 13 June 6, 2019 11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. Staff does not anticipate this amendment serving as a deterrent to the improvement of residential adjacent properties. 12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasting with the public welfare. If the proposed development complies with the GMP through the proposed amendment, then that constitutes a public policy statement supporting zoning actions when they are consistent with said Comprehensive Plan. In light of this fact, the proposed change does not constitute a grant of special privilege. Consistency with the FLUE is further determined to be a public welfare relationship because actions consistent with plans are in the public interest. 13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning. The subject property can be used in accordance with existing zoning; however, the proposed reconfiguration Preservation Area to Recreational Area cannot be achieved without amending the PUD. 14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the County. It is staff’s opinion that the proposed amendment to Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club will not be out of scale with the needs of the community. 15. Whether is it impossible to find other adequate sites in the County for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. The petition was reviewed for compliance with the GMP and the LDC, and staff does not specifically review other sites in conjunction with a specific petition. 16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration, which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. Any development anticipated by the PUD Document would require considerable site alteration, and this project will undergo extensive evaluation relative to all federal, state, and local development regulations during the SDP and platting processes, and again later as part of the building permit process. 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 110 Attachment: Naples Heritage Golf & Country Club Staff Report (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) PUDA-PL20180002619, Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club PUD Page 12 of 13 June 6, 2019 17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance, as amended. The activity proposed by this amendment would have no impact on the availability of adequate public facilities and services. 18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: This project does not require Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) review, as this project did not meet the EAC scope of land development project reviews as identified in Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Codes of Laws and Ordinances. NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM): On May 9, 2019, the applicant held a duly advertised NIM at the Naples Heritage Golf & Country Club located at 8150 Heritage Club Way, Naples, FL 34112. The meeting commenced promptly at 5:30 PM and ended shortly after 6:00 PM. There were approximately 35 people in attendance, mostly residents of Naples Heritage Golf & Country Club. The applicant’s team communicated the nature of the PUDA in a clear and concise manner, and there wasn’t any evidence of opposition. The applicant did have a procedural mishap. Although the meeting was conducted with audio recording, there was a problem with the recording device. Hence, there is not a recording of the meeting. A copy of the NIM summary and sign-in sheet are included in Attachment C. Staff concurs with the summary and is an agreement that it is reflective of the personally witnessed proceedings. COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The County Attorney’s Office reviewed this staff report on ????? RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Collier County Planning Commission forward Petition PUDA- PL20180002619 to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of approval. Attachments: A) Proposed Ordinance B) FLUE Consistency Review C) NIM Materials D) Application - Backup Materials 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 111 Attachment: Naples Heritage Golf & Country Club Staff Report (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) ZONING DIVISION _ ZONING SERVICES SECTION REVIEWED BY: /1ryts?= MIKE BOSI, AICP, DIRECTOR ZONING DIVISION _ ZONING SERVICES SECTION APPROVED BY: PUDA-PL20180002619, Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club PUD June 6,2019 t/;,kt J^a >^ tg DATE S- -2,-z- tg DATE RAYM /. BELLOWS, ZONING MANAGER ISION _ ZONING SERVICES SECTION AMES FRENCH, DEPUTY DEPARTMENT HEAD GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT Page 13 of 13 MARTINEZ, PRINCIPAL PLANNER 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 112 Attachment: Naples Heritage Golf & Country Club Staff Report (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 113 Attachment: Ordinance - 051319 (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 114 Attachment: Ordinance - 051319 (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 115 Attachment: Ordinance - 051319 (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.bPacket Pg. 116Attachment: Ordinance - 051319 (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) Zoning Division ● 2800 North Horseshoe Drive ● Naples, FL 34104 ● 239-252-2400 Page 1 of 2 Growth Management Department Zoning Division Comprehensive Planning Section MEMORANDUM To: Gil Martinez, Principal Planner Zoning Division, Zoning Services Section From: Sue Faulkner, Principal Planner Zoning Division, Comprehensive Planning Section Date: May 9, 2019 Subject: Future Land Use Element Consistency Review PETITION NUMBER: PUDA - PL20180002619 - REV 2 PETITION NAME: Naples Heritage Golf & Country Club PUDA REQUEST: The petitioner is requesting to convert ±2.9 acres of Preserve to Recreational area; decreasing the total Preserve acres to ±219.1 acres. The Clubhouse at Naples Heritage proposes to relocate their tennis facility to this newly designated Recreational area site from the main clubhouse site so that they can renovate their clubhouse amenities and create additional parking for the clubhouse to alleviate parking issues that occur during season from rise in usage of the golf, tennis center, fitness center and swimming pool. LOCATION: The ±557.8-acre Naples Heritage Golf & Country Club Planned Unit Development (PUD) is located on the south side of Davis Boulevard (SR 84) and the west side of Collier Blvd. (CR 951) in Sections 3, 4, 9 and 10, Township 50 South, Range 26 East. The PUD stretches east to west approximately 1.5 miles between Davis Blvd. and Collier Blvd. and extends north to south approximately 1.6 miles from the northern most point at Davis Blvd. The ±2.9-acre subject site for the petition’s proposed Golf Course/Recreational area is located less than 1,000 feet southeast of the intersection of Davis Blvd and Naples Heritage Blvd., on the north side of Naples Heritage Drive, in Section 4, Township 50 South, Range 26 East. COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING COMMENTS: The Naples Heritage Golf & Country Club PUD is identified as Urban Designation, Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict and partially within the Residential Density Band of Activity Center #6 on the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). The Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club PUD is already approved for recreational facilities; non-residential uses listed include “Parks, open space and recreational uses” in the Urban Designation of the Future Land Use Element (FLUE). The Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club PUD (Ordinance #95-74) was approved December 12, 1995 for 799 dwelling units on 557.8 acres; which is an approved density of approximately 1.43 dwelling units per acre. The Density Rating System of the FLUE allows up to a maximum of 4 dwelling units per acre in the Urban Residential Subdistrict; and in the portion of the PUD that is located within the Residential Density Band, it would qualify for a bonus of up to 3 additional dwelling units for up to a maximum of 7 dwelling units per acre (4 DUs + 3 DUs = 7 DUs). 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 117 Attachment: FLUE Consistency Review Dated 5-9-19 (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) Zoning Division ● 2800 North Horseshoe Drive ● Naples, FL 34104 ● 239-252-2400 Page 2 of 2 Select FLUE Policies are shown below (in italics), followed by staff analysis in [bracketed bold text]. FLUE Policy 5.6: New developments shall be compatible with, and complementary to, the surrounding land uses, as set forth in the Land Development Code (Ordinance 04-41, adopted June 22, 2004 and effective October 18, 2004, as amended). [Comprehensive Planning staff leaves this determination to Zoning Services staff as part of their review of the petition in its entirety.] FLUE Objective 7 and Relevant Policies: Due to the changes proposed (no changes in permitted uses, densities, or intensities) beyond the currently approved Naples Heritage Golf & Country Club PUD, staff is of the opinion that a re-evaluation of FLUE policies under Objective 7 (pertaining to access, interconnections, walkability, etc.) is not necessary. CONCLUSION This PUD amendment petition may be deemed consistent with the Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan. PETITION ON CITYVIEW cc: Michael Bosi, AICP, Director, Zoning Division David Weeks, AICP, Growth Management Manager, Zoning Division, Comprehensive Planning Section Raymond V. Bellows, Manager, Zoning Division, Zoning Services Section PUDA-PL2018-2619 Naples Heritage R2.docx 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 118 Attachment: FLUE Consistency Review Dated 5-9-19 (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) Naples Heritage May 9, 2019 Neighborhood Information Meeting Naples Heritage President, Ken Gaynor opened the meeting at 5:30 pm. He explained that the purpose of this meeting was to explain that we are requesting the approval from Collier County for a usage change of 2.9 acres from preserve to recreational and the meeting is required for Collier County. We also explained that the need for relocating the tennis court was alleviate the dangerous parking problem that the Club has. He asked that all questions be held until after the presentation. He then introduced Professional Engineer Gina Green. Gina Green had a power point presentation with two site plans describing the exact location of the 2.9 acres. Also describing the location of our current tennis courts and the acreage we would be returning to preserve as a requirement of the Army Corp of Engineers and South Florida Water Management District. She also gave an overview of the previous petition for placing the Tennis Facility on the 5.21 acre site that will now be placed into preserve area. The floor was then open for questions and the responses were made by Ken Gaynor, Gina Green, and Patrick Dorbad (General Manager of Naples Heritage). Questions from Quentin Greely from Cedar Hammock: He wanted to know how Naples Heritage was able to gain approval from each of the three agencies (South Florida Water Management District, The Army Corps of Engineer, and Collier County to be able to utilize preserve for recreational usage. Response: “Patience”. We described that we have been working with the three agencies over the past two years and although we have had positive feedback, we have not yet received final approval. Again, the reason for requesting the acreage was to eliminate our dangerous parking problem. Question from Richard Rutkowski Naples Heritage: He wanted to know how the Army Corps will allow us to us their acreage when their history was to not allow development of wetlands. Response: When no other location was suitable, we agreed to offer up 5 acres that is currently recreational and recondition them to become and remain as preserve still however owned by Naples Heritage. Also, we were required to purchase credits for Panther Island at a cost of $120,000. Question Kenneth Osborn Naples Heritage: Will there be additional parking for the driving range near the new tennis complex. Response: Although there will be 20 parking spaces for cars, 10 spaces for golf carts and bike racks; there will be none specifically for the driving range. It was explained to Mr. Osborn that we can either provide a golf cart or a shuttle for him to get to the driving range. 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 119 Attachment: NIM Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) Question Ruff Warren Naples Heritage: He has been hearing about a campus expansion for years without anything being done. Why do we believe that it will happen this time? Response: He was given three important dates, two for Collier County June 6 (Planning Commissioner Meeting) and June 25 (Collier County Commissioner Meeting) Also that we will be on the South Florida Water Management District agenda for the June 13 meeting. If all of these dates result in approvals we can continue with the permitting process. Question Richard Rutkowski Naples Heritage: Cedar Hammock made a similar request and was rejected how are we able to receive approval to utilize current preserve acreage for a tennis complex? And when will we have approval and when will the project be completed. Response: To our knowledge Cedar Hammock has not made an attempt to utilize existing preserve areas for recreational purpose. Again, we hope to be approved because of our dangerous parking situation. If all of our target dates are meet, we can hopefully begin the project no later than early August. Question Doug Hoyte Naples Heritage: What will be happening to the 5‐acre parcel shown in blue on our site plan. Response: It was explained that this was not part of the meeting but the following explanation was given. That area will be designated as preserve as part of the agreement with the Army Corps of Engineers and will remain as such by Naples Heritage. Question Bill Whelan Naples Heritage: Will these be additional parking space at the tennis center for driving range use and have we considered forming a political action committee in order to help us gain approval for our project. Response: There will be parking spaces at the tennis complex which can be used for the driving range when not being used by the tennis players. We have not formed a political action committee but we have had individual meeting with four of the five County Commissioners and each has stated that they will support our project. Question James Goluszewski Naples Heritage: With all of the delays will we still be able to deliver the campus expansion project on budget. Response: If all of the previously mentioned dates are met, we will be on time and on budget. Also, in the event of delays we remain committed to delivering the project on budget. He was also reminded that the project has a $500,000 contingency built into the budget. 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 120 Attachment: NIM Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) Ken Gaynor thanked all who attended and for their questions an interest in this project. 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 121 Attachment: NIM Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.dPacket Pg. 122Attachment: NIM Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.dPacket Pg. 123Attachment: NIM Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.dPacket Pg. 124Attachment: NIM Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.dPacket Pg. 125Attachment: NIM Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.dPacket Pg. 126Attachment: NIM Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 127 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 128 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 129 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 130 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 131 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 132 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 133 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 134 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) GINA R. GREEN, P.A. PROFESSIONAL CIVIL ENGINEER Phone: 239-348-0500 Mobile: 239-229-6238 Fax: 866-720-4823 Email: ggreeneng@aol.com 3310 1st Avenue NW Naples, Florida 34120 Intake Team Collier County—Growth Management Division 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 RE: Naples Heritage Golf & Country Club PUD Amendment To Whom It May Concern: The Naples Heritage Golf & Country Club is proposing to Amend the PUD Master Plan to convert 2.87 acres of Con- servation Area to Golf Course/Recreational area. The Clubhouse at Naples Heritage proposes to relocate their tennis facility to this site from the main clubhouse site so that the can renovate their clubhouse amenities and create additional parking for the clubhouse to alleviate parking issues that occur during the seasonal months when the population of the club is at it maximum. When this club was developed in the late 1990’s, golf was the main amenity at the clubhouse. Due to the demographic change of the club and the rise in active adults, the tennis center, fitness center and swimming pool has seen increased activity which is creating the parking issues during season. By relocating the tennis center, this will open up the clubhouse site to allow for more parking while rerouting the tennis activity to this new location. The new tennis facility will be to the west and adjacent to the existing aqua driving range up the street and to the north of the existing club house. The tennis facility will have it own parking lot for cars, golf carts and bicycles along with pe- destrian access form the existing sidewalk along Naples Heritage Drive. The renovation of the main clubhouse site and the relocation of the tennis center will modernize this development to keep up with the new developments that are currently being built that offer facilities in line with the active adult life- styles of today. This will help to maintain and/or increase the property values within this development . March 4, 2019 Sincerely, 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 135 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 136 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 137 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 138 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 139 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 1 REZONING CRITERIA COMPLIANT WITH LDC SECTION 10.02.08 F. NAPLES HERITAGE GOLF & COUNTRY CLUB 10.02.08 F. Nature of requirements of planning commission report. When pertaining to the rezoning of land, the report and recommendations of the planning commission to the board of county commissioners required in 10.02.08 E. shall show that the planning commission has studied and considered the proposed change in relation to the following, when applicable: 1.Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies and future land use map and the elements of the growth management plan. The proposed recreational use is consistent with the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) goals, objectives, and policies, and Future Land Use Map (FLUM), and the goals, objectives and policies, as applicable, of the other elements of the growth management plan. 2.The existing land use pattern. The subject property is located within the Urban Residential (UR) Subdistrict. The UR designation allows for relatively low density residential development. This parcel is located within and is part of the Naples Golf & Country Club PUD. This change is internal and will not impact any neighboring zoning. 3.The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. The 2.87 acre parcel is located within the existing Naples Heritage G & CC PUD, and will not result in an isolated or unrelated district. 4.Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. Existing district boundaries were logically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. 5.Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed amendment necessary. Changed or changing conditions do not make the passage of the proposed amendment necessary; however, changing conditions are the driving factor behind this rezone request. Naples Heritage would like to modernize and expand its existing recreational facilities to remain competitive with other residential developments. 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 140 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 2 6.Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. The proposed change will not adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood, as the proposed use is compatible with surrounding uses, and adequate setbacks, landscape buffers, and open space will be provided to protect living conditions. 7.Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety. The requested RPUD rezone will not create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses or otherwise affect public safety. The recreational facility is for the private use of the members of Naples Heritage Golf and Country club and their guests. 8.Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem. The requested PUD rezone will not create a drainage problem as it has been designed in accordance with SFWMD and Collier Country stormwater design requirements and will be permitted through these agencies. 9.Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas. The requested rezone will not reduce light and air to adjacent areas as building heights are limited and the PUD has been designed with ample open space including a native preserve area, golf course, lakes, and perimeter landscape buffers. 10.Whether the proposed change will adversely affect property values in the adjacent area. The proposed change will not adversely affect property values in the adjacent area, as surrounding areas are similarly zoned. 11.Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. The proposed change will not be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. 12.Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare. The proposed change does not constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare. 13.Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning. 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 141 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 3 The parcel is located with in the existing Naples Heritage Golf & Country Club PUD. We are changing the designation of the Tract from Preserve to Golf Course to allow the construction of the new tennis facility. 14.Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the county. The request is to allow recreational facilities associated with an existing residential PUD, which is not out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the county. 15.Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. While it is not impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use, given the location of the 2.87-acre parcel and the fact it is within the existing PUD, it would be difficult to find such a site. 16.The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration required to make the property usable under the proposed zoning classification is typical of, and not different from, any other similar residential development in Collier County. 17.The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County growth management plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance [Code ch. 106, art. II], as amended. There is availability of public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance, to serve this project. 18.Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the board of county commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare. To be determined by the BCC. 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 142 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) NAPLES HERITAGE GOLF AND COUNTRY CLUB Exhibit “A” LIST OF PERMITTED USES There are no changes proposed to the allowed permitted uses for this PUD Amendment as established in the current PUD document. 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 143 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) NAPLES HERITAGE GOLF AND COUNTRY CLUB Exhibit “B” DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS There are no changes to the development standards for this PUD Amendment as established in the current PUD document. 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 144 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) NAPLES HERITAGE GOLF AND COUNTRY CLUB Exhibit “D” LEGAL DESCRIPTION PROPERTY DESCRIPTION The North half (N ½) of the North half (N ½) of Section 10, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, less the easterly 100 feet thereof. AND The East half (E ½) of Section 9, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. EXCEPT the Southeast Quarter (SE ¼) of the Southeast Quarter (SE ¼) of the Southeast Quarter (SE ¼) of Section 9, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. ALSO EXCEPT the Southwest Quarter (SW ¼) of the Southwest Quarter (SW ¼) of the Southeast Quarter (SE ¼) of Section 9, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. AND The Southerly 1,370 feet of the Southeast Quarter (SE ¼) of Section 4, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, lying southerly of Davis Boulevard (S.R. 84). AND The Southeast quarter (SE ¼) less the southerly 1,370 feet of Section 4, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, lying southerly of Davis Boulevard (S.R. 84). AND The North half (N ½) of the West half (W ½) of the West half (W ½) of the Southwest quarter (SW ¼) of Section 3, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, lying southerly of Davis Boulevard (S.R. 84). 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 145 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) NAPLES HERITAGE GOLF AND COUNTRY CLUB Exhibit “E” LIST OF REQUESTED LDC DEVIATIONS AND JUSTIFICATION OF EACH There are no new deviations requested for this PUD Amendment. All deviations in the current PUD document will remain. 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 146 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) NAPLES HERITAGE GOLF AND COUNTRY CLUB Exhibit “F” LIST OF DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS There are no development commitments for this PUD Amendment. All development commitments in the current PUD document will remain. 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 147 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Created 9/28/2017 Page 1 of 3 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DISCLOSURE FORM This is a required form with all land use petitions, except for Appeals and Zoning Verification Letters. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. Please complete the following, use additional sheets if necessary. a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest: Name and Address % of Ownership b. If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each: Name and Address % of Ownership c. If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest: Name and Address % of Ownership NAPLES HERITAGE GOLF & COUNTRY CLUB, INC. 100% KENNETH GAYNOR, PRESIDENT -- MICHAEL O'NEIL, VICE-PRESIDENT -- CATHY DUGGAN, SECRETARY -- JOHN CLAEYS, TREASURER -- 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 148 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.ePacket Pg. 149Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.ePacket Pg. 150Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.ePacket Pg. 151Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) PROPERTY DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT “A” NAPLES HERITAGE GOLF & COUNTRY CLUB The North half (N ½) of the North half (N ½) of Section 10, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, less the easterly 100 feet thereof. AND The East half (E ½) of Section 9, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. EXCEPT the Southeast Quarter (SE ¼) of the Southeast Quarter (SE ¼) of the Southeast Quarter (SE ¼) of Section 9, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. ALSO EXCEPT the Southwest Quarter (SW ¼) of the Southwest Quarter (SW ¼) of the Southeast Quarter (SE ¼) of Section 9, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. AND The Southerly 1,370 feet of the Southeast Quarter (SE ¼) of Section 4, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, lying southerly of Davis Boulevard (S.R. 84). AND The Southeast quarter (SE ¼) less the southerly 1,370 feet of Section 4, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, lying southerly of Davis Boulevard (S.R. 84). AND The North half (N ½) of the West half (W ½) of the West half (W ½) of the Southwest quarter (SW ¼) of Section 3, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, lying southerly of Davis Boulevard (S.R. 84). 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 152 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.ePacket Pg. 153Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) Notes: 1.Property and preserve boundaries for Tract RA provided by A. Trigo & Associates 2.All other preserve boundaries are approximate and obtained from the SFWMD GIS website or digitized from aerial photography. CONCEPTUAL MASTER PLAN . I � - -I 1 0 750 1500 SCALE FEET Property Line� -� ---- Existing Preserve Areas Tract RA - Proposed Recreation Area Formerly Designated at Preserve Area(2.90 Acres) Wetland Impact Mitigation area(5.21 ac., South Florida Water Management District & Army Corps of Engineers PERMIT USE ONLY, NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION May 8 2019 Drawing: conceptual master plan exhibit.DWG Naples Heritage Planned Unit Development PUDA 20180002619 �DEXBENDER ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING FORT MYERS 239-334-3680 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 154 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) NAPLES HERITAGE GOLF & COUNTRY CLUB PUDA Environmental Information (April 16, 2019) The proposed PUDA consists of changing the land use for 2.87± acres within the Naples Heritage Golf & Country Club. The entire 2.87± acres consists of native vegetation as defined by Collier County LDC Section 3.05.07.A.1. Please see the attached Vegetation Map and Protected Species Assessment for a discussion of the current conditions within the 2.87േ acres. The existing PUD is 557.8± acres in size. The pre-development acreage of “native vegetation” (as currently defined by Collier County LDC Section 3.05.07.A.1) on the property is not known. Based on several Florida Land Use, Cover, and Forms Classification System (FLUCCS) codes used to delineate the pre-development vegetative communities on-site (i.e. FLUCCS Code 424 – “Melaleuca/Schinus”) it is likely that a portion of the property was not “native vegetation”. The proposed plan will result in 242.1± acres of native wetland and upland preserves. Approximately 43 percent of the overall PUD will consist of native wetland and upland preserves thereby substantially exceeding the County’s native vegetation requirements. Proposed wetland impacts are under review by the South Florida Water Management District and it is anticipated that the Environmental Resource Permit will be issued soon. Their review included an analysis of wetland impact minimization, cumulative wetland impacts, potential listed species impacts, and wetland mitigation. The proposed project is consistent with all applicable Collier County Conservation and Coastal Management Elements of the Growth Management Plan and the Land Development Code. Craig M. Smith of DexBender prepared the Protected Species Assessment. Mr. Smith has been employed as a full time environmental consultant in southwest Florida since 1987. A copy of his credentials is attached. Y:\NHG-1\County\Feb 2019 PUDA\Apil RAI\County Zoning Info.Docx 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 155 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 156 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) NAPLES HERITAGE GOLF & COUNTRY CLUB TENNIS FACILITY Section 4, Township 50 South, Range 26 East Collier County, Florida Protected Species Assessment April 2019 Prepared for: Naples Heritage Golf & Country Club 8150 Heritage Club Way Naples, FL 34112 Prepared by: DexBender 4470 Camino Real Way, Suite 101 Fort Myers, FL 33966 (239) 334-3680 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 157 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 1 INTRODUCTION This 2.87 acre site is located within Naples Heritage Golf & Country Club east of Naples Heritage Drive. The lands to the north of this area consist of preserved wetlands within Naples Heritage Golf & Country Club. The aqua driving range is located to the east. Naples Heritage Drive is to the south and west. SITE CONDITIONS The property is currently a forested conservation easement area dominated by native plants. VEGETATIVE CLASSIFICATIONS The predominant vegetation associations were mapped in the field on 2016 digital 1” = 200’ scale aerial photography. The project boundary was obtained from Gina R. Green, P. A. and inserted into the digital aerial. Two vegetation associations were identified using the Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCCS). Figure 1 depicts the approximate location and configuration of these vegetation associations and Table 1 summarizes the acreages by FLUCCS Code. A brief description of each FLUCCS Code is also provided below. Table 1. Acreage summary by FLUCCS Code FLUCCS CODE DESCRIPTION ACREAGE 411 Pine Flatwoods 0.02 624 Cypress – Pine 2.85 Total 2.87 FLUCCS Code 411, Pine Flatwoods The northwestern corner of the site contains widely scattered slash pines (Pinus elliottii) in the canopy with dahoon holly (Ilex cassine) and myrsine (Rapanea punctata) in the midstory. The ground cover is dominated by saw palmetto (Serenoa repens) with widely scattered swamp fern (Blechnum serrulatum). FLUCCS Code 624, Cypress – Pine The remainder of the forested portion of the site is vegetated by a canopy of cypress (Taxodium sp.) and slash pine. These species, as well as dahoon holly, cabbage palm (Sabal palmetto), cocoplum (Chrysobalanus icaco), and wax myrtle (Myrica cerifera), are present in the midstory. Ground cover consists primarily of swamp fern, muhly grass (Muhlenbergia sp.), and saw-grass (Cladium jamaicense) with scattered areas of red ludwigia (Ludwigia repens), maidencane (Panicum hemitomon), false nettle (Boehmeria cylindrica), and climbing hemp weed (Mikania scandens). 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 158 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 159 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 3 SURVEY METHOD Based on the general habitat types (FLUCCS Codes) identified on-site there is a potential for a limited number of species listed as endangered, threatened, or species of special concern by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) or the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) to potentially occur on the project site. These species include gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus), eastern indigo snake (Drymarchon corais couperi), red-cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis), a variety of wading birds, Big Cypress fox squirrel (Sciurus niger avicennia), Florida bonneted-bat (Eumops floridanus), Florida black bear (Ursus americanus floridanus), and Florida panther (Felis concolor coryi). The bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), which has been delisted by the FWC and FWS, is still protected by other regulations and was therefore included in the survey. Please see Table 2 for additional listed species included in the survey. In addition, per Collier County regulations three species of orchids (Cyrtopodium punctatum, Encyclia cochleata, and E. tampensis) and four species of wild pine (Tillandsia fasciculata, T. utriculata, T. balbisiana, and T. flexuosa) which could potentially occur on-site were included in the survey. Table 2. Listed Species That Could Potentially Occur On-site FLUCCS CODE Percent Survey Coverage Species Name Present Absent 411 95 Eastern Indigo Snake (Drymarchon corais couperi) Gopher Tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) Southeastern American Kestrel (Falco sparverius paulus) Florida Black Bear (Ursus americanus floridanus) Florida Bonneted-Bat (Eumops floridanus) Florida Panther (Felis concolor coryi) Red-Cockaded Woodpecker (Picoides borealis) √ √ √ √ √ √ √ 624 95 Little Blue Heron (Egretta caerulea) Tricolored Heron (Egretta tricolor) Big Cypress Fox Squirrel (Sciurus niger avicennia) Everglades Mink (Mustela vison evergladensis) Florida Black Bear (Ursus americanus floridanus) Florida Bonneted-Bat (Eumops floridanus) Florida Panther (Felis concolor coryi) Red-Cockaded Woodpecker (Picoides borealis) √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 160 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 4 In order to comply with FWC/FWS survey methodology guidelines, each habitat type was surveyed for the occurrence of the species described above using meandering pedestrian belt transects. The meandering pedestrian belt transects were spaced approximately 60 feet apart. The approximate location of direct sighting or sign (such as tracks, nests, and droppings) of a listed species, when observed, was denoted on the aerial photography. The 1" = 200’ scale aerial Protected Species Assessment map (Figure 1) depicts the approximate location of the survey transects and the results of the survey. The listed species survey was conducted during the mid-day hours of August 23, 2018. The weather at the time of the survey was hot and sunny. Prior to conducting the protected species survey, a search of the FWC listed species database (updated June 2017) was conducted to determine the known occurrence of listed species in the project area. The database indicated that a Florida panther (FP- 219) had been recorded in the general area (south of David Boulevard and west of Collier Boulevard) between late 2013 and the fall of 2015 (Figure 2). That panther was subsequently hit and killed by a vehicle on I-75 just west of the Collier Boulevard exit. The database also indicated that Florida black bear have been recorded near the property. The project site is located within a wood stork core foraging area but is not within the panther Priority 1 or 2 zones. This search revealed no other known protected species occurring on or immediately adjacent to the site. SURVEY RESULTS Collier County Plants Stiff-leaved wild-pines (T. fasciculata) were observed in various locations across the 2.87 acre site. This species occur within the native wetland preserves elsewhere within Naples Heritage and therefore, pursuant to Collier County LDC Section 3.04.03, there is no requirement to relocate stiff-leaved wild-pines into the preserves. Other Listed Species No cavity trees suitable for use by either the Florida bonneted bat or RCW have been observed on-site. No other species listed by either the FWS or the FWC were observed on the site during the protected species survey. This is consistent with a previous survey conducted by DexBender on January 25, 2017. Y:\NHG-1\County\Feb 2019 PUDA\PSA Small.Doc 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 161 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) FP 2 19 FP 2 19 Sour ce: Esr i, Dig it alG lobe , G eoE ye, Eart hstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS,USDA, USG S, AEX, G e tm a pping, Aer ogr id, I G N, IGP, swisstopo, and the GISUser Co m munity Napl es Her itag e Tennis Facility Perm it Use Only - N ot For ConstructionMap b ased o n dat a o bt ain ed fro m th e F lorida Fish and WildlifeConservation Commission.Pr oject bo und ary p rovided b y Gina R. Green, P.A. Fig ure 2. Nui sa nc e Bear Callsand Pa nth er Tel emetry M ap ³ Section: 4Township: 50 SRange: 26 E 2/1 8/2019 3 :5 8:04 PM Y:\NHG-1 \GIS_GPS\Bear-Panther.mxd Fort My er s (23 9) 334-3680 0 250 500 750 1,000125Feet Legend Nuis a nc e B ear Call [z Pa nthe r Tel e metry Point 5 N ote : C at N u mb e r FP 2 1 9 subsequentlykilled by ve h icle on US 75. Sub jectParcelDavis BoulevardNaples Heritage Drive 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 162 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club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e Packet Pg. 163 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club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±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e Packet Pg. 164 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 July 30, 2018 Page 6 of 11 STATEMENT OF UTILITY PROVISIONS FOR PUD REZONE REQUEST APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Name of Applicant(s): _______________________________________________________________ Address: _________________________________ City: ___________ State: ________ ZIP: _______ Telephone: ____________________ Cell: _____________________ Fax: ______________________ E-Mail Address: ____________________________________________________________________ Address of Subject Property (If available): ______________________________________________ City: _________________ State: ________ ZIP: _________ PROPERTY INFORMATION Section/Township/Range: / / Lot: Block: Subdivision: ___________________________________________________ Metes & Bounds Description: _________________________________________________________ Plat Book: Page #: Property I.D. Number: ____________________________________ TYPE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL TO BE PROVIDED Check applicable system: a. County Utility System b. City Utility System c. Franchised Utility System Provide Name: __________________________ d. Package Treatment Plant (GPD Capacity): _________________________ e. Septic System TYPE OF WATER SERVICE TO BE PROVIDED Check applicable system: a. County Utility System b. City Utility System c. Franchised Utility System Provide Name: __________________________ d. Private System (Well) Total Population to be Served: ________________________________________________________ Peak and Average Daily Demands: A. Water-Peak: _________ Average Daily: __________ B. Sewer-Peak: _________ Average Daily: __________ If proposing to be connected to Collier County Regional Water System, please provide the date service is expected to be required: ____________________________________________________ 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 165 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 July 30, 2018 Page 7 of 11 Narrative statement: Provide a brief and concise narrative statement and schematic drawing of sewage treatment process to be used as well as a specific statement regarding the method of affluent and sludge disposal. If percolation ponds are to be used, then percolation data and soil involved shall be provided from tests prepared and certified by a professional engineer. __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ Collier County Utility Dedication Statement: If the project is located within the service boundaries of Collier County’s utility service system, a notarized statement shall be provided agreeing to dedicate the water distribution and sewage collection facilities within the project area to the Collier County Utilities. This shall occur upon completion of the construction of these facilities in accordance with all applicable County ordinances in effect at that time. This statement shall also include an agreement that the applicable system development charges and connection fees will be paid to the County Utilities Division prior to the issuance of building permits by the County. If applicable, the statement shall contain an agreement to dedicate the appropriate utility easements for serving the water and sewer systems. __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ Statement of Availability Capacity from other Providers: Unless waived or otherwise provided for at the pre-application meeting, if the project is to receive sewer or potable water services from any provider other than the County, a statement from that provider indicating adequate capacity to serve the project shall be provided. 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 166 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 1 Naples Heritage Golf & Country Club Board of Trustees Meeting Minutes January 15, 2019 Board President, Ken Gaynor, called the meeting to order at 8:30 am. Dave Beiser was absent. Twenty-three members were in attendance. A motion was made to waive the reading of the November 13, 2018 minutes. It was seconded and passed unanimously. General Manager’s Report – Patrick Dorbad reported.  Patrick said the Club is in full swing. Our staff is ready for season. The golf course is in good shape.  There are several new events planned this season: Atlantic City Boys and Back to Chicago. The Atlantic City Boys sold out in 20 minutes for the two-night event. Back to Chicago reservations will open in February.  December was a great month. Food and Beverage reached over $1.2 million in revenues for the year, which is a record for the Club. We had only $14,000 in unspent food minimum billed this year, which shows that the Club is busy.  The roof on the Clubhouse is coming along. It should be done within the next couple of weeks.  The golf course has over 200 rounds of golf a day.  Patrick is sad to announce that Ted, one of our player service employees has passed away.  The Campus Expansion is moving forward. Patrick discussed the process so far and what still needs to be done. Our goal is to submit our paperwork to the Southwest Florida Water Management District as soon as possible. Once they receive our paperwork, we should have an answer by March. The architect has to move forward with some of the plans to have them ready for submittal.  Our goal is to start building in July, after a positive vote this March. Patrick thanked the Campus Expansion Task Force: Ken Gaynor, David Beiser, Bob Browne, Janice Cafmeyer, Gary Eve, Peter Lombardi, Peter Ramundo, Dick Rogan, Phil Smith, and Linda for all their help. Treasurer’s Report – Cathy Duggan reported. On an operational basis for the end of the month, our total cash position in the Operating Accounts was $3,536,743; the balance in the Reserve Accounts was $1,949,775. Significant highlights of the current month’s financial statement include:  Total payroll salaries account for approximately 40% of our annual operating expenses. In 2018, several departments operated with fewer staff members than budgeted. The total favorable amount to budget was $20,181.  The Club, as a whole, finished the month and the year better than expected. The month ended favorable to budget by $53,164.  Administration: Resales rebounded in December; to finish the year better than expected. For the year, total interest income amounts to over $61,000 (Combined Operating and Reserve Fund). The month ended well ahead of the operating budget by $18,426. 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 167 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 2  Golf: The golf shop revenues were “off” in December, savings were realized in the expenses. Revenue for the month was unfavorable to budget by $3,131 and expenses were favorable to budget by $3,374.  Golf Course Maintenance: Despite incentivizing increased payroll, a positive variance was realized for the month Maintenance was favorable to budget by $4,113.  Tennis/Pool/Fitness/Facilities: All expenses were well in line. The month ended favorable to budget by $3,637.  Facilities Maintenance: With fewer activities in December, expenses were noted in the maintenance department. The month ended favorable to budget by $6,134.  Landscaping Common Area: All expenses were in line. Short one man on the crew, the month ended favorable to budget by $5,297.  Restaurant & Concession: Experienced a good month of revenues and held expenses down dramatically. The month ended favorable to budget by $17,574. Following is a summary of revenue variances in relation to budget by departments for Year to Date: Year-to-Date Revenues Year-to-Date Profit/Loss favorable $319,576 Administration $149,470 favorable favorable $ 39,153 Golf Rounds/Shop $ 66,786 favorable favorable $ 6,318 Golf Merchandise ------- ---------- Course Maint./Common $ 81,009 favorable ---------- Racquet/Pool/Fitness $ 73,877 favorable favorable $119,904 Restaurant $ 58,801 favorable unfavorable $ (2,388) Concession $ (875) unfavorable $482,563 2018 providing a good year $429,067 Finance Committee – Peter Ramundo reported.  Peter Ramundo stated that December was a great month by $53,000 and $429,000 ahead for the year.  Food cost also dropped 1 percent, which is an improvement. Community Relations – Dick Rogan reported.  The Community Relations Committee is very involved with the Campus Expansion project. They are going to meet with all of the County Commissioners, so they know who Naples Heritage is before they vote on our project. The meetings will begin sometime in February.  They would also like the commissioners to come to Naples Heritage so they can see who we are.  Dick Rogan met with the Chair of the County Planning Commission. Golf Committee – Gary Balconi reported.  The golf shop is helping everyone with the switching over to Golf Genius.  The Ladies Member Guest is coming up this weekend. They are still looking for a few players. 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 168 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 3  The LGA breakfast was well received. There is a proposal to move Ladies day from Thursday to Tuesday. The Committee will discuss this more. MGA match play is under way as well.  The Handicap Committee posted a new policy regarding posting scores. ARC – Bill Davidson reported.  Bill Davidson reported that the Committee is discussing bird feeders in the community. Not only are they feeding the birds, but the bears and racoons as well. They are going to bring this issue to the president’s council next month.  One request was turned down at the meeting. The request was for a generator for a condo. Green Committee – Steve Gauly reported.  The Committee discussed the walking/jogging/bicyclist rule. They have received a few complaints with some people breaking this rule. The Committee believes that this rule should be enforced. The Pro Shop and Chad will enforce this rule. If someone is found breaking the rule, they will be given a letter. If the offender continues to break the rule, member privileges could be suspended.  The adopt-a-hole is coming back. Bill Zack is going to take care of the back nine holes. They are still looking for someone to help with the front nine. Marie Novicki and LeeAnne Tait are going to ask the LGA for any volunteers. House Committee - LeeAnne Tait reported.  LeeAnne Tait stated that the LGA/MGA dinner dance has been combined to one night. The Committee is going to look into revamping this event next year.  Friday night dinner has been discussed. They are going to try adding a pasta night, to help the kitchen.  The Committee is still working on “Going Green”, which has been well received.  The events have been well attended. They had 185 people for Bingo the other night. Everyone liked the new format. Bylaw Committee – Dave Brewin reported.  The bylaw town hall was very well received. They had around 300 people in attendance.  The Committee will be looking into the next phase of the bylaws after the announcement on whether the new changes were passed. Then they will decide what direction they will go.  The vote count for the proposed declaration and bylaw change is Thursday, January 24th at 3 pm. The voting representative from each association will tally the ballots. John Claeys will be the auditor from the Board. The results will be announced at the special Board of Trustees meeting on Friday, January 25th at 3 pm. Long Range Planning Committee – Robbie Williams reported.  The LRP Committee assigned a member to each of the Committees to see what their wants and needs are for the future. The representative for the Golf Committee is recommending bridges, irrigation, bunkers, and revamping the maintenance facility.  More coco palms have been planted along Davis Blvd. It will take a few years for those plants to grow. Once that happens, you will not be able to see through the vegetation into the community. 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 169 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 4 Recreation Committee – Mary Fensel reported.  The committee gave Patrick and Greg some ideas for the campus expansion project.  Greg said the fitness classes have been well received. The results for the survey that was done for the body sculpting were good. Maggie has been very well received.  They created a subcommittee to help with the campus expansion project. Cindy Lunderville will be heading up that committee. Security and Signage Committee – James Rallis reported.  The committee recommended purchasing two more radar/speed signs. The proposal was included in the Board packet.  The Naples Heritage sign on Collier Blvd was hit. Currently, there is a cone placed there to mark the turn. The Club is responsible to have the sign repaired and put back up. Patrick has been in contact with municipal signs to get the permit process going.  Bears in the community have become an issue. An email blast will be sent out if a bear has been spotted.  Jim Rallis is looking into a CPR class for our members. There will be more information to follow. CDD – Ken Gaynor reported.  The aerification project has run into a few issues. They are working on the problem. They are also working on getting a quote for putting on the next three aerators, which will be placed in the lakes at 6, 7, 8. There was no report from the following Committees:  President’s Council Old Business: Speed/Radar Sign  The Board entertained a motion to approve the purchase of two radar/speed signs. Peter Lombardi made the motion. Dick Dashnaw seconded the motion. The Board discussed the motion and it passed unanimously. New Business: Town Hall Meetings  Ken Gaynor stated that the town hall meeting dates are January 31, February 5, and February 13. He asked that all Board members be in attendance of those meetings. Affidavit Significant Other  The Board reviewed the affidavits for significant others to be added to John Murphy, Bart Boissonneault and Jim Reed membership.  The Board entertained a motion to approve the addition of a significant other for John Murphy, Bart Boissoneault, and Jim Reed. Mike O’Neil made the motion. Cathy Duggan seconded the motion. The Board discussed the motion and it passed unanimously. Campus Expansion 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 170 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 5  Ken Gaynor reported that Gary Eve, Dick Dashnaw, and Patrick Dorbad have been working on a schedule for the dates for the campus expansion project. They have set up a weekly conference call with the engineer, biologist, architect, and our construction company to keep everyone on the same page.  Peter Ramundo reported that the financial aspect of the campus expansion has been approved and is being recommended to the Board.  The budget is $7,394,500. The established assessment amount will be $700 per member for eight years. The first installment will begin on July 1, 2019 then January 1, 2020 through 2026.  The annual budget surplus (approximately $200,000) will be dedicated to this project. $1.3 million from the reserve fund will also be allocated.  We will continue to preserve and maintain the reserve fund during the construction process for other upcoming projects.  The Finance Committee is recommending that Ken Gaynor, President of the Board, be authorized to enter into agreement with Wells Fargo on the agreed upon Non-Revolving Term Loan for $5.5 million at 4.65%. We are able to accelerate the principle payments with this loan.  Ken Gaynor said the input from the committee has been invaluable. Cathy Duggan stated that the Board has spent a lot of time with this process.  The town hall meetings will go over the increases of operation for this project. The estimated cost is $160 per member.  Ken Gaynor stated that Janice Cafmeyer and Bob Browne have done a great job with the marketing for this project. Janice Cafmeyer went over the marketing items. There is an all member marketing mailing which includes: a cover letter, a 2 ½ page project summary, and the town hall meeting dates. The meeting dates are being broken down by associations to help with attendance. Don Garrett, our contractor will also be in attendance as well.  The voting package will be mailed out middle to late February, after the town hall meetings. The results of the vote will be announced at the annual meeting on March 22nd at New Hope Ministries.  The Board entertained a motion to approve Patrick Dorbad, the General Manager, to continue to work with the biologist, architect and engineer for the purpose of gaining the necessary approvals from all the governing agencies to proceed with the campus expansion project. Mike O’Neil made the motion. John Claeys seconded the motion. The vote is as follows: Georgie Schulte Yes Cathy Duggan Yes Dick Dashnaw Yes Bernie Galiani Yes John Claeys Yes Mike O’Neil Yes Peter Lombardi Yes Ken Gaynor Yes Dave Beiser – absent The Board discussed the motion and it passed unanimously. Board of Trustees Resolution  The Board entertained a motion to transfer land from the CDD to Naples Heritage Golf & Country Club.  This Resolution is made by the Board of Directors of Naples Heritage Golf & Country Club of Naples, Inc., a Florida not-for-profit corporation (“Club”) pursuant to the Article of Incorporation and Bylaws of the Club and in accordance with Chapter 720, Florida Statues. 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 171 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 6 WHEREAS, the Club is responsible for the development and maintenance of the common areas of Naples Heritage Golf & Country Club of Naples known as “Common Areas,” pursuant to the Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions for Naples Heritage Golf & Country Club of Naples, originally recorded in Official Records Book 2188, at Page 603, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, and re-recorded Official Records Book 2208, at Page 605, of the Public Record of Collier County, Florida as amended (collectively, the “Declaration”); and WHEREAS, Naples Heritage Community Development District (the “District” ) is a community development district that was established pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 190, Florida Statutes by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, through the adoption of Ordinance No. 96-57 on September 24, 1996; and WHEREAS, Chapter 190, Florida Statues, authorizes the District to construct, install, operate, finance and/or maintain systems and facilities for certain basic infrastructure including, but not limited to, district roads, sanitary sewer collection system, potable water distribution system, reclaimed water distribution system, stormwater/floodplain management, off-site improvements, landscape and hardscape, irrigation system, street lighting and other public improvements; and WHEREAS, the Club is undertaking the construction of a new tennis center and related amenities as part of the Common Areas (the “Project”); and WHEREAS, in order to complete the Project it is necessary for the Club to take certain actions including, without limitation, the following (collectively, the “Tennis Center Actions”): (i) granting of a conservation easement to South Florida Water Management District and/or other applicable governmental bodies over that certain real property of the Club described on Exhibit “A” attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference (“Club Property”); (ii) conveying the Club Property in fee simple to the District; and (iii) accepting the conveyance of the certain real property described on Exhibit “B” to attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference (“District Property”) in fee simple from the District; and NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Board of Directors of the Club as follows: RESOLVED, that the Board of Directors hereby approves and authorized the Tennis Center Actions. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the Board authorizes and directs Ken Gaynor, as President of the Club (or the Vice President in the President’s absence) to execute any and all documentation necessary or required in order for the Club to effectuate the Tennis Center Actions and carry out the intent of this Resolution including, without limitation, a conservation easement and a special warranty deed.  Ken Gaynor entertained the motion as read above. Dick Dashnaw seconded the motion. The vote is as follows: 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 172 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 7 Georgie Schulte Yes Cathy Duggan Yes Dick Dashnaw Yes Bernie Galiani Yes John Claeys Yes Mike O’Neil Yes Peter Lombardi Yes Ken Gaynor Yes Dave Beiser – absent The Board discussed the matter and it passed unanimously. It was approved and adopted at the meeting of the Board of Directors of Naples Heritage Golf & Country Club of Naples, Inc. this, 15th day of January, 2019.  Ken Gaynor stated that in order to take the 2.87 acres owned by the CDD, it needs to be transferred to the Club. This way the Club will be able to develop that property. The CDD has already voted in agreement to have the land transferred over. The Board needs to make a resolution to accept the land transfer. Financial Resolution for the Campus Expansion Project  Ken Gaynor read the resolution for the Board: WHEREAS the Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club’s Campus Expansion Task Force was formed to evaluate a campus expansion project to meet the needs of its members; And WHEREAS the Task Force has investigated, studied, and recommended the approval of a campus expansion project; And WHEREAS, the Finance Committee has reviewed the financial aspects of said project and recommended approval of the expansion project; NOW, THEREFORE be it resolved that the Naples Heritage Board of Trustees approve the Campus Expansion Project as recommended by the Campus Expansion Task Force and the Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club Finance Committee; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Naples Heritage Board of Trustees approve a budget of $7.4 million to finance said project as recommended by the Campus Expansion Task Force and the Naples Heritage Finance Committee; AND BE IT RESOLVED that a special assessment of $700 per unit per year be established for the 799 homes in Naples Heritage Golf & Country Club for a period of eight years and collected on July 1, 2019 and thereafter on January 1 from the year 2020 until 2026 as recommended by the Campus Expansion Task Force and the Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club Finance Committee; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Annual Budget Surplus of $200,000 be appropriated for the purpose of partially funding said project for the next eight years starting in 2019 and continuing until the year 20026 as recommended by the Campus Expansion Task Force and the Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club Finance Committee; 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 173 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 8 AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the sum of $1,320,100 from the Naples Heritage Reserve Fund be allocated to said project as recommended by the Campus Expansion Task Force and the Naples Heritage Golf & Country Club Finance Committee; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the President of Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club be and is hereby authorized to enter into an agreement with Wells Fargo Bank for the purpose of financing said project as recommended by the Campus Expansion Task Force and the Naples Heritage Golf & Country Club Finance Committee. Said agreement calls for a Non-Revolving Term Loan of up to $5.5 million Line of Credit at the rate of interest of 4.65 percent.  Ken Gaynor made the motion. Dick Dashnaw seconded the motion. The vote is as follows: Georgie Schulte Yes Cathy Duggan Yes Dick Dashnaw Yes Bernie Galiani Yes John Claeys Yes Mike O’Neil Yes Peter Lombardi Yes Ken Gaynor Yes Dave Beiser – absent The Board discussed the motion and it passed unanimously. The next monthly meeting will be February 19th, 2019, at 8:30 AM. Ken Gaynor declared the meeting adjourned at 10:00 am. Minutes submitted by Secretary, John Claeys. 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 174 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 175 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 176 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 177 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 178 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 179 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 180 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 181 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 182 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 183 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 184 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 185 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 186 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 187 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 188 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 189 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 190 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 191 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 192 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 193 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 194 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 195 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 196 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 197 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 198 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 199 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 200 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 201 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 202 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 203 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 204 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 205 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 206 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 207 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 208 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 209 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 210 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 211 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 212 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 213 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 214 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 215 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 216 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 217 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 218 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 219 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 220 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 221 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 222 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 223 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 224 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 225 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 226 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 227 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 228 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 229 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 230 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 231 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 232 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 233 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 234 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 235 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 236 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 237 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 238 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 239 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 240 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 241 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 242 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 243 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 244 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 245 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 246 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 247 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 248 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 249 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 1 EVALUATION CRITERIA NAPLES HERITAGE GOLF & COUNTRY CLUB PUD PUD Rezone Considerations (LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5) a. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. This is a request to change the use within the existing PUD from Preserve (P) to Golf Course (GC) of +/- 2.87 acres to allow the tennis facilities for the Naples Heritage Golf & Country Club PUD to be relocated to a new site within the PUD. The proposal is consistent with all applicable Goals, Objectives and Policies of the County’s Growth Management Plan (GMP). The area is Urban designated, and has access to central water and sewer and all other urban public services. It is within the existing Naples Heritage G & CC PUD and is located internally to the PUD and surrounded entirely by the PUD. The site is suitable for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic access, drainage, sewer, water and other utilities, and public services. The site has approvals from Army Corps of Engineers and South Florida Water Management District to allow the Preserve area to be impacted and release of the conservation easement from this 2.87+/- acre parcel. b. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the County Attorney. The property is under the ownership of a single entity as evidenced by the ownership documents provided, and the continuing operation and maintenance of areas and facilities that are private (not to be provided or maintained at public expense) shall be maintained through the existing homeowners association. Once all approvals are completed, the parcel will be transferred to the Naples Heritage Golf & Country Club, Inc. for continued maintenance and operation of the new recreational facility. c. Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives and policies of the growth management plan. (This is to include identifying what Sub-district, policy or other provision allows the requested uses/density, and fully explaining/addressing all criteria or conditions of that Sub-district, policy or other provision.) II. Compliance with Additional GMP Provisions. 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 250 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 2 Objective 7 – In an effort to support the Dover, Kohl & Partners publication, Toward Better Places: The Community Character Plan for Collier County, Florida, to promote smart growth policies, and adhere to the existing development character of Collier County, the following policies shall be implemented for new development and redevelopment projects, where applicable. Policy 7.1 The County shall encourage developers and property owners to connect their properties to fronting collector and arterial roads, except where no such connection can be made without violating intersection spacing requirements of the Land Development Code. The PUD has access onto both Davis Blvd. and Collier Blvd., both arterial roadways. Policy 7.2 The County shall encourage internal accesses or loop roads in an effort to help reduce vehicle congestion on nearby collector and arterial roads and minimize the need for traffic signals. The master plan achieves this objective. Policy 7.3 All new and existing developments shall be encouraged to connect their local streets and their interconnection points with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless of land use type. The redevelopment of the 2.87-acre parcel within the existing PUD does not create feasible interconnections between developments. The tract is adjacent to preserve area on two sides. Property to the east is the aqua driving range for the Naples Heritage Golf Course. The parcel takes its access from the internal roadway on the south side. Policy 7.4 The County shall encourage new developments to provide walkable communities with a blend of densities, common open spaces, civic facilities and a range of housing prices and types. Not applicable. Policy 7.5 The County shall encourage mixed-use development within the same buildings by allowing residential dwelling units over and/or abutting commercial development. This policy shall be implemented through provisions in specific subdistricts in this Growth Management Plan. Not applicable. 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 251 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 3 Policy 7.6 The County shall explore the creation of an urban "greenway" network along existing major canal banks and powerline easements. Not applicable. Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element notes that all rezoning applications shall consider the impacts on the overall system and shall not approve any such request that significantly impacts a roadway segment already operating and/or projected to operate at an unacceptable level of service within the five year planning period, unless specific mitigating stipulations are approved. The change of use the 2.87 acre tract in the existing PUD will not create additional traffic impacts, as it will be used for private recreational facilities for residents. Policy 9.3 of the Transportation Element shall require, wherever feasible the interconnection of local streets between developments to facilitate convenient movement throughout the road network. The 2.87-acre parcel in the existing PUD does not create feasible interconnections between developments. This parcel takes direct access from the internal network and is border on all sides by either conservation easements or lakes. d. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. The 2.87-acre piece is proposed for recreational facilities, which is compatible with the surrounding land uses. e. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. There are adequate areas with usable open space proximate to and nearby this development. The existing PUD contains approximately 103.5 acres of golf course; 242 acres of preserve; and 87 acres of lake. f. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. All necessary improvements and facilities are already in place to serve this development. 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 252 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 4 g. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. There are no issues that would limit the ability of the subject property or the surrounding areas to accommodate this project. h. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. The PUD conforms to the LDC PUD provisions. 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 253 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.ePacket Pg. 254Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.ePacket Pg. 255Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.ePacket Pg. 256Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 257 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 258 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 259 Attachment: Application - Backup Materials (9050 : Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club) 06/06/2019 COLLIER COUNTY Collier County Planning Commission Item Number: 9.A.3 Item Summary: PL20180000261/CPSP-18-2: 9 ordinance amendments of Ordinance 89-05, as amended, the Collier County Growth Management Plan of the unincorporated area of Collier County Florida, relating to the Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy. The following elements are changed or created with a separate ordinance for each: Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element and the Golden Gate Area Future Land Use Map and Map Series; Golden Gate City Sub-Element of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element; Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element; Rural Estates Sub-Element of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element; Conservation and Coastal Management Element; Future Land Use Element And Future Land Use Map And Map Series; the Stormwater Management Sub-Element of the Public Facilities Element; the Solid Waste Sub-Element of the Public Facilities Element; and the Transportation Element. [Coordinator: Kris Va nLengen, AICP, Project Manager] Meeting Date: 06/06/2019 Prepared by: Title: Planner, Senior – Zoning Name: Marcia R Kendall 05/20/2019 10:06 AM Submitted by: Title: Division Director - Planning and Zoning – Zoning Name: Michael Bosi 05/20/2019 10:06 AM Approved By: Review: Growth Management Department David Weeks Additional Reviewer Completed 05/20/2019 11:50 AM Growth Management Operations & Regulatory Management Judy Puig Review item Completed 05/20/2019 5:02 PM Growth Management Operations & Regulatory Management Donna Guitard Review Item Completed 05/21/2019 2:52 PM Growth Management Department James C French Review Item Completed 05/21/2019 3:12 PM Zoning Michael Bosi Review Item Completed 05/22/2019 8:01 AM Planning Commission Mark Strain Meeting Pending 06/06/2019 9:00 AM 9.A.3 Packet Pg. 260 AGENDA ITEM #9.A.3 COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENTS CCPC: JUNE 6, 2019 BCC: SEPTEMBER TBD, 2019 GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN (GGAMP) RESTUDY AMENDMENTS (ADOPTION HEARINGS) PROJECT #PL20180000261/PETITION CPSP-2018-2 9.A.3.a Packet Pg. 261 Attachment: CCPC Binder Cover (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) TABLE OF CONTENTS GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN (GGAMP) RESTUDY AMENDMENTS [ADOPTION HEARING] CCPC JUNE 6, 2018 TAB #1: Adoption Staff Report DOCUMENT: CCPC Adoption Staff Report TAB #2: Adoption Ordinances DOCUMENT: Future Land Use Element, Conservation Coaster Management Element, Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element, Golden Gate City Sub Element, Golden Gate Urban Estates Sub Element, Golden Gate Rural Estates Sub Element, Solid Waste Sub Element, Stormwater Sub Element, and Transportation Element TAB #3: Transmittal Ex. Summary DOCUMENT: Executive Summary, including BCC Memo(s) 01/25/2019 & 11/20/2018 TAB #4: Transmittal Staff Report DOCUMENT: CCPC Transmittal Staff Report w/Attachment A Strike-Through- Underline Text (and/or Map) Changes TAB #5: Attachment B DOCUMENT: Data & Analysis-White Paper TAB #6: Transmittal Resolution DOCUMENT: Resolution with Exhibit “A” Text &/or Map – Full Strike-Through & Underline changes TAB #7: Legal Advertisements DOCUMENT: CCPC Adoption Advertisement 9.A.3.b Packet Pg. 262 Attachment: CCPC Table of Contents (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Agenda Item 9.A.4 ‒ 1 ‒ CPSP-2018-2 / PL20180000261 Proposed Golden Gate Area Master Plan Amendments for Adoption STAFF REPORT COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT, ZONING DIVISION, COMMUNITY PLANNING SECTION HEARING DATE: June 6, 2019 RE: PETITION PL20180000261, STAFF-PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN OF THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AND CORRESPONDING AMENDMENTS TO THE CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT, THE SOLID WASTE SUB-ELEMENT AND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SUB-ELEMENT OF THE PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT, THE TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT, THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT AND SPECIFICALLY CREATING THE URBAN GOLDEN GATE ESTATES SUB-ELEMENT, THE RURAL GOLDEN GATE ESTATES SUB-ELEMENT AND THE GOLDEN GATE CITY SUB-ELEMENT OF THE GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN [ADOPTION HEARING] INTRODUCTION The proposed Growth Management Plan (GMP) revisions found in the attached Ordinances and corresponding Attachments A to this report (and Resolution, Exhibit A) are derived from the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) Restudy White Paper. The Transmittal Amendments were presented to and reviewed by the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) on July 19, 2018. The CCPC Transmittal Amendments recommendations were reviewed by the Board of County Commissioners (Board) on January 25, 2019. The Board voted to Transmit the amendments to the Department of Economic Opportunity (DEO) with changes as directed. DEO had no objection, recommendation or comment, nor did any other state agency that reviewed the amendments at DEO’s direction. As modified by the Board’s January direction, these modifications come before the CCPC in its capacity as the Land Planning Agency and in its capacity as the Environmental Advisory Committee for Master Plan adoption. BACKGROUND On February 10, 2015, the Board directed staff to initiate GMP “restudies” of four GMP master plans in eastern Collier County: Rural Fringe Mixed Use District (RFMUD), Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP), Rural Lands Stewardship Area (RLSA), and Immokalee Area Master Plan (IAMP). The GGAMP restudy was undertaken beginning in April 2016. As with all restudies, through a public outreach effort, staff focused on complementary land uses, economic vitality, mobility, and environmental sustainability. 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 263 Attachment: Staff Rpt GGAMP Adoption_FINAL (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Agenda Item 9.A.4 ‒ 2 ‒ CPSP-2018-2 / PL20180000261 Proposed Golden Gate Area Master Plan Amendments for Adoption The Board appointed an ad hoc advisory committee, the Growth Management Oversight Committee (GMOC) to oversee the public engagement process, review staff recommendations from a high level. The GMOC found the White Paper recommendations consistent with public participation direction, supportive of sustainability and economic vitality and, so far as known, consistent with other restudy planning efforts. The White Paper was presented to the Board on January 23, 2018. At that time, the Board directed staff to initiate the GMP Amendment process for the proposed changes to the GGAMP. The White Paper, Exhibit __, provides the data and analysis underlying the revisions to Goals, Objectives, Policies, and Land Use Designation Descriptions within the GGAMP. The specific “Transmittal” amendments to the GGAMP were presented to the CCPC on July 19, 2018. The staff report describing these amendments is attached. That staff report summarizes the substantive amendments and describes the reorganization of goals, policies, and objectives presented to the CCPC on that date. Several other GMP Elements are presented for amendment. These are included for consistency and cross-reference. The language used in these collateral elements is identical to language changes within the GGAMP itself. The CCPC, by motion 6-0, recommended transmittal of the proposed amendments subject to certain changes. The significant changes recommended by the CCPC were: 1. In creating greenways, eminent domain should not be an option (Policy 5.1.3). 2. Neighborhood Centers should only be upsized through private amendments (Land Use Designation Description (LUDD) (2) (A) (2) (b) (1)). 3. Electrical substations should not trigger conditional use eligibility on adjoining properties (LUDD (2) (A) (3) (d) (6)). 4. Cell towers as conditional uses should have locational restrictions, specifically, limited to parcels no smaller than 2.25 acres and adjacent to arterial or collector roadways (LUDD (2) (A) (3) (e) (5)). At its meeting on January 25, 2019, the Board voted 5-0 to approve transmittal of the GGAMP and related GMP Element changes to DEO, subject to modifications as follows: 1. Transitional Conditional uses at major intersections should not be included in the amendments. 2. References to “churches” in the LUDD sections should be changed to “neighborhood churches,” to be defined through the LDC process. 3. Reorganize to completely separate the three study areas within the GGAMP- Urban Estates, Golden Gate City and Rural Estates- into separate sub-elements, so that Goals Policies and Objectives (GOPs) along with LUDD provisions would be contained in geographically distinct plans. Staff understood the intent of this direction to separate the map series as well. Following the changes directed by the Board, the GGAMP was transmitted on March 8, 2019, to DEO. DEO had no objection, recommendation or comment, nor did any other state agency that reviewed the amendments at DEO’s direction. Staff notes the following items that should be addressed as part of the Adoption review process: • In directing staff to insert “neighborhood” before the word church at specific locations within the text as submitted by the Golden Gate Estates Area Civic Association, it appears that mor e locations were identified than intended. There are references to “neighborhood churches” in both the Urban Estates and in Golden Gate City. Staff is concerned that this was not intended when the board directed changes as contained in a third-party document submitted that very day for Board consideration. 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 264 Attachment: Staff Rpt GGAMP Adoption_FINAL (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Agenda Item 9.A.4 ‒ 3 ‒ CPSP-2018-2 / PL20180000261 Proposed Golden Gate Area Master Plan Amendments for Adoption • The owner of two parcels located behind the CVS on Golden Gate Parkway and Santa Barbara (indicated on the aerial with an X) has requested their property be removed from the proposed Golden Gate City Downtown Subdistrict. A current buyer is in its Due Diligence phase, and the property owner does not want to cause any disruption to the potential sale. Staff has no objection to this request and recommends removing the two parcels from the Golden Gate City Downtown Subdistrict. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This item was reviewed by the County Attorney’s office on May 17, 2019. [HFAC] STAFF RECOMMENDATION That the Collier County Planning Commission, acting as the Land Planning Agency and the Environmental Advisory Council, forward the proposed GGAMP restudy amendment Ordinances to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of approval. [REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 265 Attachment: Staff Rpt GGAMP Adoption_FINAL (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Agenda Item 9.A.4 ‒ 4 ‒ CPSP-2018-2 / PL20180000261 Proposed Golden Gate Area Master Plan Amendments for Adoption PETITION NO. PL20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 Staff Report for the June 6, 2019, CCPC Meeting. 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 266 Attachment: Staff Rpt GGAMP Adoption_FINAL (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 267 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 268 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 269 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Words underlined are added; words struck-through are deleted. EXHIBIT “A” To update and reorganized the current Golden Gate Area Master Plan, along with the title, heading and Future Land Use Map series. The full document is struck through, followed by the underlined reorganized Plan. GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN Prepared by Collier County Planning and Zoning Department Comprehensive Planning Section Prepared for COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Adopted October 1997 Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 1 of 64 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 270 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Words underlined are added; words struck-through are deleted. AMENDMENTS TO COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN SYMBOL DATE AMENDED ORDINANCE NO. The parenthesized Roman numeral symbols enumerated above appear throughout this Element and provide informational citations to adopted documents recorded in the Official Records of Collier County, as required by Florida law. These symbols are for informational purposes only, meant to mark entries amended after the 1997 adoption of the full Element and typically found in the margins of this document, but are not themselves adopted. * Indicates adopted portions ** Ordinance No. 2000-25 rescinded and repealed in its entirety Collier County Ordinance No. 99-63, which had the effect of rescinding certain EAR-based (1996 EAR) objectives and policies at issue in Administration Commission Case No. ACC-99-02 (DOAH Case No. 98-0324GM). *** Ordinance No. 2000-26 amended Ordinance No. 89-05, as amended, the Collier County Growth Management Plan, having the effect of rescinding certain EAR-based (1996 EAR) objectives and policies at issue in Administration Commission Case No. ACC-99-02 May 9, 2000 2000-25 ** May 9, 2000 2000-26 *** (I) May 9, 2000 2000-27 (II) May 9, 2000 2000-28 (III) May 9, 2000 2000-29 (IV) March 13, 2001 2001-12 (V) May 14, 2002 2002-24 (VI) September 10, 2003 2003-44 (VII) December 16, 2003 2003-67 (VIII) October 26, 2004 2004-71 (IX) June 7, 2005 2005-25 (X) January 25, 2007 2007-19 (XI) December 4, 2007 2007-76 (XII) December 4, 2007 2007-77 (XIII) December 4, 2007 2007-83 (XIV) October 14, 2008 2008-55 (XV) October 14, 2008 2008-56 (XVI) October 14, 2008 2008-59 (XVII) July 28, 2010 2010-31 (XVIII) July 28, 2010 2010-32 (XIX) September 14, 2011 2011-29 (XX) January 9, 2013 2013-15 (XXI) November 18, 2014 2014-41 (XXII) November 10, 2015 2015-62 (XXIII) May 10, 2016 2016-12 (XXIV) June 13, 2017 2017-23 Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 2 of 64 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 271 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Words underlined are added; words struck-through are deleted. (DOAH Case No. 98-0324GM), more specifically portions of the Intergovernmental Coordination Element (Ord. No. 98-56), Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge (Ord. No. 97-59) and Drainage (Ord. No. 97-61) sub-elements of the Public Facilities Element, Housing Element (Ord. No. 97-63), Golden Gate Area Master Plan (Ord. No. 97-64), Conservation and Coastal Management Element (Ord. No. 97-66), and the Future Land Use Element and Future Land Use Map (Ord. No. 97-67); and readopting Policy 2.2.3 of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan. • The above Ordinance No. 2007-19 is based on the 2004 Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR). • The above Ordinance No. 2013-15 is based on the 2011 Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR). Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 3 of 64 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 272 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Words underlined are added; words struck-through are deleted. AMENDMENTS TO COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN – prior to 2000 GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN DATE AMENDED ORDINANCE NO. May 19, 1992 92-34 August 4, 1992 92-50 May 25, 1993 93-24 April 12, 1994 94-22 March 14, 1995 95-12 April 14, 1998 98-26 September 8, 1998 98-70 February 23, 1999 99-17 Note: All of the above amendments occurred after adoption of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan in 1991 (Ord. No. 91-15) and prior to adoption of amendments in 1997 that were subsequently re-adopted in 2000. These amendments are no longer denoted on the pages of the Element with Roman numeral symbols. Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 4 of 64 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 273 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Words underlined are added; words struck-through are deleted. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. INTRODUCTION 1 II. OVERVIEW 2 A. County-Wide Planning Process B. Golden Gate Area Planning Process * III. IMPLEMENTATION SECTION 3 Goals, Objectives and Policies 3 Land Use Designation Description Section 13 1. Urban 13 2. Estates 21 3. Agricultural/Rural Settlement Area 45 4. Overlays and Special Features 45 * LIST OF MAPS 46 Golden Gate Area Master Plan Study Areas Golden Gate Area Future Land Use Map High Density Residential Subdistrict 1989 Boundaries of Activity Centers Downtown Center Commercial Subdistrict Urban Mixed Use Activity Centers Golden Gate Parkway and Coronado Parkway Golden Gate Urban Commercial Infill Subdistrict and Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict Santa Barbara Commercial Subdistrict Golden Gate Parkway Professional Office Commercial Subdistrict Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict Pine Ridge Road (CR 896) ‒ Interchange Activity Center and Pine Ridge Road Mixed Use Subdistrict Golden Gate Estates Neighborhood Centers Wilson Boulevard/Golden Gate Boulevard Center Collier Boulevard/Pine Ridge Road Center Golden Gate Boulevard/Everglades Boulevard Center Immokalee Road/Everglades Boulevard Center Randall Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict Commercial Western Estates Infill Subdistrict Golden Gate Parkway Interchange Conditional Uses Area Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict Mission Subdistrict Estates Shopping Center Subdistrict Estates Shopping Center Subdistrict Conceptual Plan Everglades – Randall Subdistrict Southbrooke Office Subdistrict Conditional Uses Subdistrict: Golden Gate Parkway Special Provisions Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 5 of 64 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 274 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Words underlined are added; words struck-through are deleted. I. INTRODUCTION 1 As part of the revised Growth Management Plan, the County adopted the original Golden Gate 2 Area Master Plan (GGAMP) in 1991. The GGAMP was further revised in 1997. The Golden Gate 3 Area Master Plan provides growth management regulations for the designated Golden Gate Area 4 (see Golden Gate Area Master Plan Study Areas Map). 5 The Golden Gate Area was previously subject to the regulations outlined in the County's Future 6 Land Use Element (FLUE). However, in 1991, the unique characteristics of the area resulted in 7 adoption of a Master Plan for Golden Gate, as a separate Element of the Collier County Growth 8 Management Plan. This Master Plan superseded former Objective 1, Policy 1.1, and Policy 1.3 9 of the FLUE. All other Goals, Objectives, and Policies contained in the FLUE and all other 10 Elements of the Growth Management Plan remain applicable to the Golden Gate Area. In 11 addition, the Golden Gate Area Future Land Use Map will be used instead of the County-Wide 12 Future Land Use Map. 13 In April 1996, the Board of County Commissioners adopted the Evaluation and Appraisal Report 14 (EAR) for Collier County. As a result of the recommendations made in the EAR, Ordinance 91-15 15, which adopted the original Golden Gate Area Master Plan, was repealed and a new Ordinance 16 97-64 was adopted. 17 In February of 2001, the Board of County Commissioners directed staff to initiate a restudy of the 18 Golden Gate Area Master Plan. Accordingly, in June of 2001, Comprehensive Planning Section 19 Staff requested that the Board appoint an advisory committee, consisting of residents of Golden 20 Gate City and Golden Gate Estates, to aid Staff in the restudy process. The Golden Gate Area 21 Master Plan Restudy Committee met on over twenty (20) occasions, between June 2001 and 22 June 2003, to consider proposed amendments to the GGAMP, as well as other matters related to 23 the Golden Gate Area. All meetings were open to the public; many of these meetings were well 24 attended. 25 The restudy process was divided into two phases. The County transmitted Phase I amendments 26 to the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA) in April 2003. These amendments were 27 adopted, as Ordinance 2003-44, in September 2003. Phase II amendments were transmitted in 28 June 2004. The Phase II amendments were adopted in October 2004, as Ordinance 2004-71. 29 This plan includes three major sections: 30 The OVERVIEW section provides an introduction to Countywide and Golden Gate Area planning 31 efforts. 32 The IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY places the Plan into effect. Strategies have been developed 33 to address land use, public facilities, transportation, rural character, emergency management and 34 natural resources. This section also includes the Goals, Objectives, and Policies, and the Golden 35 Gate Area Future Land Use Map. 36 The SUPPORT DOCUMENT outlines data and information used to develop the Implementation 37 strategy, including the Goals, Objectives, and Policies. 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 6 of 64 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 275 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Words underlined are added; words struck-through are deleted. II. OVERVIEW 1 A. COUNTY-WIDE PLANNING PROCESS 2 Pursuant to Section 163.3177(6), Florida Statutes, the Collier County Growth Management Plan 3 shall contain the following elements: 4 1. Future Land Use 5 2. Housing 6 3. Public Facilities 7 4. Conservation and Coastal Management (Coastal Counties only) 8 5. Intergovernmental Coordination 9 6. Capital Improvements 10 7. Transportation 11 8. Recreation and Open Space. 12 In addition to the above Elements, local government comprehensive plans in Florida may, by 13 decision of the local legislative body, contain one or more optional elements. Optional elements 14 are required to comply with certain general criteria under Section 163.3177, Florida Statutes, but 15 are not subject to specific requirements (with some exceptions). In 1991, the Board of County 16 Commissioners chose the option of adopting the Golden Gate Area Master Plan, in recognition of 17 the unique characteristics of the Golden Gate Area. 18 In addition to establishing the Collier County Growth Management Plan’s mandatory structure, 19 Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, also subjects the Plan to a mandatory evaluation process every 20 seven (7) years. This process involves the preparation of an Evaluation and Appraisal Review 21 (EAR) to determine whether, and to what extent, the existing Growth Management Plan has 22 carried out its stated Goals, Objectives and Policies. 23 B. GOLDEN GATE AREA PLANNING PROCESS 24 Objective 4 of the Collier County Future Land Use Element (FLUE) allows the countywide 25 planning process to “address specific geographic or issue areas.” Policy 4.1 of this Objective 26 reads as follows: 27 “A detailed Master Plan for Golden Gate Estates has been developed and was incorporated 28 into this Growth Management Plan in February, 1991. The Master Plan addresses Natural 29 Resources, Future Land Use, Water Management, Public Facilities and other considerations.” 30 In February 1991, the Board of County Commissioners adopted the original Golden Gate Area 31 Master Plan. The original Master Plan incorporated the recommendations of a Citizens Steering 32 Committee. A revised and updated Master Plan was adopted in 1997, pursuant to 33 recommendations of the County’s 1996 Evaluation and Appraisal Report. In 2001, the Board of 34 County Commissioners established the Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy Committee and 35 directed Staff to work with the Committee to further revise and update the Master Plan. The Board 36 of County Commissioners adopted revisions to the GGAMP, incorporating the recommendations 37 of the Restudy Committee, in 2003 and 2004. 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 7 of 64 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 276 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Words underlined are added; words struck-through are deleted. III. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY 1 This section places the plan into effect. Implementation strategies include the Goals, Objectives 2 and Policies, and the Land Use Designation Description Section. 3 GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES 4 GOAL 1: TO GUIDE LAND USE AND PUBLIC FACILITY DECISION MAKING AND TO 5 BALANCE THE NEED TO PROVIDE BASIC SERVICES WITH NATURAL RESOURCE 6 CONCERNS THROUGH A WELL PLANNED MIX OF COMPATIBLE LAND USES WHICH 7 ENSURE THE HEALTH, SAFETY, WELFARE, AND QUALITY OF LIFE OF THE LOCAL 8 RESIDENTS. 9 10 OBJECTIVE 1.1: 11 Develop new or revised uses of land consistent with designations outlined on the Golden Gate 12 Area Future Land Use Map and provisions found in the Land Use Designation Description Section 13 of this Element. 14 15 Policy 1.1.0.1: 16 The Policies under the above Objective shall identify the Future Land Use Designations, Districts, 17 and Subdistricts for the Golden Gate Area. 18 19 Policy 1.1.0.2: 20 The Land Use Designation Description Section of this Element shall provide the standards and 21 permitted uses for Golden Gate Area Future Land Use Districts and Subdistricts. 22 23 Policy 1.1.0.3: 24 The Golden Gate Area Future Land Use Map and companion Future Land Use Designations, 25 Districts, and Subdistricts shall be binding on all development orders unless otherwise permitted 26 in this Master Plan effective with the adoption of this Master Plan. 27 28 Policy 1.1.1: 29 The URBAN Future Land Use Designation shall include Future Land Use Districts and 30 Subdistricts for: 31 A. URBAN ‒ MIXED USE DISTRICT 32 1. Urban Residential Subdistrict 33 2. High Density Residential Subdistrict 34 3. Downtown Center Commercial Subdistrict 35 B. URBAN ‒ COMMERCIAL DISTRICT 36 1. Activity Center Subdistrict 37 2. Golden Gate Urban Commercial Infill Subdistrict 38 3. Santa Barbara Commercial Subdistrict 39 4. Golden Gate Parkway Professional Office Commercial Subdistrict 40 5. Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 8 of 64 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 277 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Words underlined are added; words struck-through are deleted. Policy 1.1.2: 1 The ESTATES Future Land Use Designation shall include Future Land Use Districts and 2 Subdistricts for: 3 A. ESTATES – MIXED USE DISTRICT 4 1. Residential Estates Subdistrict 5 2. Neighborhood Center Subdistrict 6 3. Conditional Uses Subdistrict 7 4. Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict 8 5. Mission Subdistrict 9 6. Everglades – Randall Subdistrict 10 B. ESTATES – COMMERCIAL DISTRICT 11 1. Interchange Activity Center Subdistrict 12 2. Pine Ridge Road Mixed Use Subdistrict 13 3. Randall Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict 14 4. Commercial Western Estates Infill Subdistrict 15 5. Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict 16 6. Estates Shopping Center Subdistrict 17 7. Southbrooke Office Subdistrict 18 19 Policy 1.1.3: 20 The AGRICULTURAL/RURAL Future Land Use Designation shall include the following Future 21 Land Use District: 22 A. RURAL SETTLEMENT AREA DISTRICT 23 24 Policy 1.1.4: 25 Overlays and Special Features shall include: 26 A. Southern Golden Gate Estates Natural Resource Protection Overlay 27 28 Policy 1.1.5: 29 Conditional Use requests within Golden Gate Estates shall adhere to the guidelines outlined in 30 the Conditional Uses Subdistrict. 31 32 Policy 1.1.6: 33 To obtain Conditional Use approval, a super majority vote (minimum of 4 votes) by the Board of 34 Zoning Appeals shall be required. 35 36 Policy 1.1.7: 37 No development orders shall be issued inconsistent with the Golden Gate Master Plan with the 38 exception of those unimproved properties granted a positive determination through the Zoning 39 Re-evaluation Program and identified on the Future Land Use Map Series as properties 40 consistent by Policy and those development orders issued pursuant to conditional uses and 41 rezones approved based on the County-Wide Future Land Use Element (adopted January 10, 42 1989, Ordinance 89-05) which was in effect at the time of approval. Any subsequent development 43 orders shall also be reviewed for consistency with the Growth Management Plan based on the 44 County-Wide Future Land Use Element. 45 46 47 Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 9 of 64 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 278 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Words underlined are added; words struck-through are deleted. 1 Policy 1.1.8: 2 The sites containing existing public educational plants and ancillary plants, and the undeveloped 3 sites owned by the Collier County School Board for future public educational plants and ancillary 4 plants, within the GGAMP area, are depicted on the Future Land Use Map Series in the 5 countywide FLUE and on the Public School Facilities Element Map Series, and referenced in 6 FLUE Policy 5.14 and Intergovernmental Coordination Element Policy 1.2.6. All of these sites are 7 subject to the general Interlocal Agreement, adopted on May 15, 2003 by the Collier County 8 School Board and on May 27, 2003 by the Board of County Commissioners, and as subsequently 9 amended and restated, with an effective date of December 2008, and subject to the implementing 10 land development regulations to be adopted; and, shall be subject to the School Board Review 11 (SBR) Interlocal Agreement, adopted on May 15, 2003 by the Collier County School Board and 12 on May 27, 2003 by the Board of County Commissioners, and subject to the implementing land 13 development regulations. All future educational plants and ancillary plants shall be allowed in 14 zoning districts as set forth in FLUE Policy 5.14. 15 16 17 OBJECTIVE 1.2: 18 Ensure public facilities are provided at an acceptable level of service. 19 20 Policy 1.2.1: 21 Requests for new uses of land shall be subject to level of service standards and concurrency 22 requirements for public facilities as outlined in the Capital Improvement Element of the Growth 23 Management Plan. 24 25 Policy 1.2.2: 26 The Collier County Transportation Department shall continue to explore alternative financing 27 methods to accelerate paving of lime-rock roads in the Estates. 28 29 Policy 1.2.3: 30 Consistent with Chapter 89-169, Florida Administrative Code, the Florida Governmental Utilities 31 Authority, or its successor, shall provide updated water and sewer service data to the Collier 32 County Water and Wastewater Authority on an annual basis. 33 34 Policy 1.2.4: 35 Due to the continued use of individual septic systems and private wells within a densely platted 36 urban area, the Florida Governmental Utilities Authority, or its successor, is encouraged to expand 37 their sewer and water service area to include all of that area known as Golden Gate City at the 38 earliest possible time. 39 40 41 OBJECTIVE 1.3: 42 Protect and preserve the valuable natural resources within the Golden Gate area. 43 44 Policy 1.3.0.1: 45 The County shall protect and preserve natural resources within the Golden Gate area in 46 accordance with the Objectives and Policies contained within Goals 6 and 7 of the Collier County 47 Conservation and Coastal Management Element. 48 49 50 51 52 53 Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 10 of 64 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 279 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Words underlined are added; words struck-through are deleted. Policy 1.3.1: 1 The Collier County Environmental Services Department shall coordinate its planning and 2 permitting activities within the Golden Gate Area with all other applicable environmental planning, 3 permitting and regulatory agencies to ensure that all Federal, State and local natural resource 4 protection regulations are being enforced. 5 6 7 OBJECTIVE 1.4: 8 Provide a living environment within the Golden Gate Area, which is aesthetically acceptable and 9 protects the quality of life. 10 11 Policy 1.4.0.1: 12 Collier County shall provide a living environment that is aesthetically acceptable and protects the 13 quality of life through the enforcement of applicable codes and laws. 14 15 Policy 1.4.1: 16 The County's Code Enforcement Board shall strictly enforce the Land Development Code and 17 other applicable codes and laws to control the illegal storage of machinery, vehicles and junk, and 18 the illegal operation of commercial activities within the Golden Gate Area. 19 20 21 22 GOAL 2: 23 TO RECOGNIZE THAT THE AREA WHICH LIES SOUTH OF INTERSTATE 75 (ALLIGATOR 24 ALLEY) TO US 41 (EAST TRAIL) IS AN AREA OF SPECIAL ENVIRONMENTAL SENSITIVITY 25 AND IS BIOLOGICALLY AND HYDROLOGICALLY IMPORTANT THROUGH PARTICIPATION 26 IN THE PICAYUNE STRAND RESTORATION PROJECT AS PART OF THE FEDERAL SAVE 27 OUR EVERGLADES PROGRAM. BASED UPON SUCH CONDITIONS, THE STATE HAS 28 ACQUIRED OWNERSHIP OF ALL LANDS WITHIN THE SOUTHERN GOLDEN GATE 29 ESTATES (SGGE) PICAYUNE STRAND RESTORATION PROJECT AREA. 30 31 32 GOAL 3: 33 TO PROVIDE FOR BASIC COMMERCIAL SERVICES FOR PURPOSES OF SERVING THE 34 RURAL NEEDS OF GOLDEN GATE ESTATES RESIDENTS, SHORTENING VEHICULAR 35 TRIPS, AND PRESERVING RURAL CHARACTER. 36 37 38 OBJECTIVE 3.1: 39 Meet the locational and rural design criteria contained within the Estates Designation, Estates-40 Mixed Use District, Neighborhood Center Subdistrict of this Golden Gate Area Master Plan 41 Element, of the Collier County Growth Management Plan when considering the placement and 42 designation of Neighborhood Centers within Golden Gate Estates. 43 44 Policy 3.1.1: 45 Neighborhood Centers within Golden Gate Estates shall be subject to the locational and rural 46 design criteria established within the Estates Designation, Estates – Mixed Use District, 47 Neighborhood Center Subdistrict of this Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element, of the Collier 48 County Growth Management Plan. 49 50 51 52 53 Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 11 of 64 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 280 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Words underlined are added; words struck-through are deleted. GOAL 4: 1 TO PRESERVE AND ENHANCE A MIX OF RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL LAND USES 2 WITHIN GOLDEN GATE CITY THAT PROVIDES FOR THE BASIC NEEDS OF BOTH THE 3 LOCAL RESIDENTS AND THE RESIDENTS OF THE SURROUNDING AREA. 4 5 6 OBJECTIVE 4.1: 7 Provide for residential and commercial land uses that meet the needs of the surrounding area in 8 the development and redevelopment within Golden Gate City. 9 10 Policy 4.0.1: 11 Development and redevelopment within Golden Gate City shall be guided by the residential and 12 commercial needs of the surrounding area. 13 14 Policy 4.1.1: 15 Collier County shall develop an implementation schedule for the creation of a community-planning 16 program for Golden Gate City. The implementation schedule shall take into consideration the 17 following issues: 18 a) Affordable housing based upon home ownership; 19 b) Commercial re-vitalization, to include: 20 i. Sidewalks 21 ii. Traffic calming measures 22 iii. Improved street lighting; 23 c) Neighborhood parks, open space and recreational centers; 24 d) Crime reduction; 25 e) Consistent enforcement of land development regulations; and, 26 f) Improved lighting for streets and parking areas. 27 28 Policy 4.1.2: 29 Collier County shall begin to examine, by holding community meetings, the feasibility of 30 establishing neighborhood-based planning programs within Golden Gate City that focus on the 31 unique or distinct features of the different portions of the community. While focusing on distinct 32 areas within the community, such neighborhood planning efforts as may be established shall not 33 neglect Golden Gate City as a whole. 34 35 Policy 4.1.3: 36 Collier County shall examine the feasibility of crafting land development regulations specific to 37 the Golden Gate City community. Such regulations shall focus on the unique circumstances of 38 this community. 39 40 41 GOAL 5: 42 TO BALANCE THE DESIRE BY RESIDENTS FOR URBAN AMENITIES WITHIN GOLDEN 43 GATE ESTATES WITH THE PRESERVATION OF THE AREA’S RURAL CHARACTER, AS 44 DEFINED BY WOODED LOTS, THE KEEPING OF LIVESTOCK, THE ABILITY TO GROW 45 CROPS, WILDLIFE ACTIVITY, LOW-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, AND 46 LIMITATIONS ON COMMERCIAL AND CONDITIONAL USES. 47 48 49 50 51 Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 12 of 64 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 281 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Words underlined are added; words struck-through are deleted. OBJECTIVE 5.1: 1 Provide for new commercial development within Neighborhood Centers. 2 3 Policy 5.1.1: 4 Consistent with public safety requirements, street, recreational and structure lighting within 5 Golden Gate Estates shall be placed, constructed and maintained in such manner as to prevent 6 or reduce light pollution. In implementing this Policy, the County shall apply the following 7 standards: 8 a. If a streetlight or an area light is required, it shall be of the type specified 9 to protect neighboring properties from direct glare. Area lighting shall be shielded 10 such that direct rays do not pass property lines. Low-pressure sodium lamps are 11 encouraged while halogen type lights are discouraged. 12 1. Where required, the street lamp shall be of the high pressure sodium type and have a 13 "cobra head with flat bottom" style or be fully shielded so that light is directed only 14 downward. Street lamps shall be mounted on a wood pole at a height and wattage 15 recommended by the appropriate electric utility and as appropriate for a rural area. 16 2. Parking lot lamps shall be low-pressure sodium type lamps and shall be mounted so 17 that they point downward without direct rays extending past the parking lot, building 18 entrance, walkway, or other area intended to be illuminated. 19 b. Where lighting of recreational areas is required, such lighting shall be mounted so as to 20 focus illumination on the areas intended to be illuminated, and to limit the amount of light 21 that extends outside of the intended area. 22 ( c. This policy shall not apply to Tract 124 and the north 150 feet of Tract 126, Unit 12, 23 Golden Gate Estates, located in the southwest quadrant of the Wilson and Golden 24 Gate Boulevards Neighborhood Center. 25 26 27 OBJECTIVE 5.2: 28 Balance the provision of public infrastructure with the need to preserve the rural character of 29 Golden Gate Estates. 30 31 Policy 5.2.1: 32 Future road and bridge improvements in Golden Gate Estates shall not only provide for safety 33 and reasonable mobility, but shall also contribute to the rural character of the area. Transportation 34 improvements shall be designed in context with their setting. 35 36 Policy 5.2.2: 37 The Collier County Parks and Recreation Department shall create a public network of greenway 38 corridors within Golden Gate Estates that interconnects public lands and permanently protected 39 green space. The greenway network shall consist of interconnected trails and paths which allow 40 people to move about the Estates Area by means other than motorized vehicles. All greenways 41 shall be constructed within existing or future public rights-of-way. In creating the greenway 42 network, the County shall not employ eminent domain proceedings. 43 44 Policy 5.2.3: 45 Recognizing the residential nature of the land uses surrounding the I-75 interchange at Golden 46 Gate Parkway, as well as the restrictions on conditional uses of the Conditional Uses Subdistrict 47 of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan, there shall be no further commercial zoning for properties 48 49 50 Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 13 of 64 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 282 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Words underlined are added; words struck-through are deleted. abutting Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. No new 1 commercial uses shall be permitted on properties abutting streets accessing Golden Gate 2 Parkway within the above-defined segment. This policy shall not apply to that existing portion of 3 the Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict, which is located at the northwest corner of 4 the intersection of Golden Gate Parkway and Santa Barbara Boulevard. 5 6 7 OBJECTIVE 5.3: 8 Provide for the protection of the rural character of Golden Gate Estates. 9 10 Policy 5.3.0.1: 11 Rural character protection provisions shall provide for the preservation of such rural amenities as, 12 but not limited to, wooded lots, the keeping of livestock, the ability to grow crops, wildlife activity, 13 and low-density residential development. 14 15 Policy 5.3.1: 16 The growing of food crops and/or the keeping of livestock on properties within Golden Gate 17 Estates shall be permitted, provided that such activities are conducted according to the Land 18 Development Code. 19 20 Policy 5.3.2: 21 The Land Development Code shall continue to allow and further encourage the preservation of 22 native vegetation and wildlife indigenous to the Estates Area. 23 24 25 GOAL 6: 26 TO PROVIDE FOR A SAFE AND EFFICIENT COUNTY AND LOCAL ROADWAY NETWORK, 27 WHILE AT THE SAME TIME SEEKING TO PRESERVE THE RURAL CHARACTER OF 28 GOLDEN GATE ESTATES IN FUTURE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE 29 GOLDEN GATE AREA. 30 31 OBJECTIVE 6.1: 32 Increase the number of route alternatives for traffic moving through the Golden Gate Area in both 33 east-west and north-south directions, consistent with neighborhood traffic safety considerations, 34 and consistent with the preservation of the area’s rural character. 35 36 Policy 6.1.1: 37 In planning to increase the number of route alternatives through the Estates Area, the Collier 38 County Transportation Division will prioritize the following routes over other alternatives: 39 a. The extension of Vanderbilt Beach Road from its current terminus to DeSoto Boulevard. 40 b. The development of a north-south connection from the eastern terminus of White 41 Boulevard to Golden Gate Boulevard. 42 c. The development of a new east-west roadway crossing the Estates Area south of Golden 43 Gate Boulevard. 44 45 Policy 6.1.2: 46 Collier County shall continue to coordinate with the Florida Department of Transportation to 47 implement a study of a potential interchange in the vicinity of I-75 and Everglades Boulevard. 48 49 50 51 52 Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 14 of 64 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 283 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Words underlined are added; words struck-through are deleted. OBJECTIVE 6.2: 1 Increase linkages within the local road system for the purposes of limiting traffic on arterials and 2 major collectors within Golden Gate Estates, shortening vehicular trips, and increasing overall 3 road system capacity. 4 5 Policy 6.2.1: 6 The County shall continue to explore alternative financing methods to facilitate both east - west 7 and north-south bridging of canals within Golden Gate Estates. 8 9 Policy 6.2.2: 10 Planning and right-of-way acquisition for bridges within the Estates Area local road system shall 11 make adequate provision for sidewalks and bike lanes. 12 13 Policy 6.2.3: 14 Sidewalks and bike lanes shall provide access to government facilities, schools, commercial 15 areas and the planned County greenway network. 16 17 18 OBJECTIVE 6.3: 19 Coordinate with local emergency services officials in planning and constructing road 20 improvements within Golden Gate Estates and Golden Gate City to ensure that the access needs 21 of fire department, police and emergency management personnel and vehicles are met. 22 23 Policy 6.3.1: 24 The Collier County Transportation Planning Section shall hold at least one annual public meeting 25 with Golden Gate Area emergency services providers and the local civic association in order to 26 ensure that emergency needs are addressed during the acquisition of right-of-way for design and 27 construction of road improvements. 28 29 Policy 6.3.2: 30 The Collier County Transportation Planning Section shall continue to coordinate with Golden Gate 31 Area emergency services providers to prioritize necessary road improvements related to 32 emergency evacuation needs. 33 34 35 GOAL 7: 36 TO PROTECT THE LIVES AND PROPERTY OF THE RESIDENTS OF THE GREATER 37 GOLDEN GATE AREA, AS WELL AS THE HEALTH OF THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT, 38 THROUGH THE PROVISION OF EMERGENCY SERVICES THAT PREPARE FOR, MITIGATE, 39 AND RESPOND TO, NATURAL AND MANMADE DISASTERS. 40 41 OBJECTIVE 7.1: 42 Maintain and implement public information programs through the Collier County Bureau of 43 Emergency Services, Collier County Sheriff’s Department, Golden Gate Fire Control and Rescue 44 District, and other appropriate agencies, to inform residents and visitors of the Greater Golden 45 Gate Area regarding the means to prevent, prepare for, and cope with, disaster situations. 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 15 of 64 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 284 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Words underlined are added; words struck-through are deleted. Policy 7.1.1: 1 The County, fire districts that serve the Golden Gate area, and other appropriate agencies, shall 2 embark on an education program to assist residents in knowing and understanding the value and 3 need for prescribed burning on public lands in high risk fire areas. 4 5 Policy 7.1.2: 6 The Golden Gate Fire Control and Rescue District and Collier County Bureau of Emergency 7 Services shall actively promote the Firewise Communities Program through public education in 8 Golden Gate Estates. 9 10 Policy 7.1.3: 11 The Collier County Land Development Services Department of the Growth Management Division 12 shall evaluate the Land Development Code for Golden Gate Estates and shall eliminate any 13 requirements that are found to be inconsistent with acceptable fire prevention standards. This 14 evaluation process shall be coordinated with the Golden Gate Fire Control and Rescue District 15 and the Collier County Bureau of Emergency Services. 16 17 Policy 7.1.4: 18 The Golden Gate Fire Control and Rescue District and the Collier County Bureau of Emergency 19 Services shall hold one or more annual “open house” presentations in the Golden Gate Area 20 emphasizing issues related to wildfires, flooding, emergency access and general emergency 21 management. 22 23 24 OBJECTIVE 7.2: 25 Ensure that the needs of all applicable emergency services providers are included and 26 coordinated in the overall public project design for capital improvement projects within the Golden 27 Gate Area. 28 29 Policy 7.2.1: 30 Preparation of Collier County’s annual Schedule of Capital Improvements for projects within the 31 Golden Gate Area shall be coordinated with planners, or the agents or representatives with 32 planning responsibilities, from the Fire Districts, public and private utilities, Emergency Medical 33 Services Department and the Collier County Sheriff’s Department to ensure that public project 34 designs are consistent with the needs of these agencies. 35 36 Policy 7.2.2: 37 Planners, or the agents or representatives with planning responsibilities, from t he Golden Gate 38 Fire Control and Rescue District, Collier County Emergency Medical Services Department and 39 the Collier County Sheriff’s Department will receive copies of pre-construction plans for capital 40 improvement projects in the Golden Gate Area and will be invited to review and comment on plans 41 for the public projects. 42 43 44 OBJECTIVE 7.3: 45 Develop strategies through the County Growth Management Division – Planning and Regulation 46 for the enhancement of roadway interconnection within Golden Gate City and the Estates Area, 47 including interim measures to assure interconnection. 48 49 50 51 52 53 Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 16 of 64 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 285 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Words underlined are added; words struck-through are deleted. Policy 7.3.1: 1 The Collier County Bureau of Emergency Services, the Collier County Transportation Division, 2 Golden Gate Fire Control and Rescue District, and other appropriate Federal, State or local 3 agencies, shall begin establishing one or more of the following routes for emergency evacuation 4 purposes: 5 a. An I-75 Interchange in the vicinity of Everglades Boulevard. 6 b. Improved emergency access from Everglades Boulevard to I-75. 7 c. Construction of a north-south bridge on 23rd Street, SW, between White Boulevard and Golden 8 Gate Boulevard. 9 10 Policy 7.3.2: 11 All new residential structures shall comply with NFPA (National Fire Protection Association, 12 Incorporated) 299 Standard for Protection of Life and Property from Wildfire, 1997 Edition, as 13 adopted by reference in the Florida Fire Code or the most recent edition. 14 15 Policy 7.3.3: 16 Modified portions of existing structures shall meet NFPA Standards through the adoption of 17 appropriate regulations in the County Building Codes. 18 19 Policy 7.3.4: 20 County-owned property within Golden Gate Estates shall be subject to an active, on-going 21 management plan to reduce the damage caused by wildfires originating from County-owned 22 properties. 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 [REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 17 of 64 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 286 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Words underlined are added; words struck-through are deleted. LAND USE DESIGNATION DESCRIPTION SECTION 1 The following section describes the three land use designations shown on the Golden Gate Area 2 Future Land Use Map. These designations generally indicate the types of land uses for which 3 zoning may be requested. However, these land use designations do not guarantee that a zoning 4 request will be approved. Requests may be denied by the Board of County Commissioners based 5 on criteria in the Land Development Code or in special studies completed for the County. 6 1. URBAN DESIGNATION: 7 URBAN MIXED USE DISTRICT AND URBAN COMMERCIAL DISTRICT 8 Urban Designated Areas on the Future Land Use Map include two general portions of Collier 9 County: areas with the greatest residential densities and areas in close proximity, which have or 10 are projected to receive future urban support facilities and services. It is intended that Urban 11 Designated areas accommodate the majority of population growth and that new intensive land 12 uses be located within them. 13 The boundaries of the Urban Designated areas have been established based on several factors 14 including: 15 • patterns of existing development, 16 • patterns of approved but unbuilt development, 17 • natural resources, water management, and hurricane risk, 18 • existing and proposed public facilities, 19 • population projections, and 20 • land needed to accommodate growth. 21 The Urban Designation will also accommodate future non-residential uses including essential 22 services as defined by the most recently adopted Collier County Land Development Code. Other 23 permitted non-residential land uses may include: 24 • parks, open space and recreational use; 25 • water-dependent and water-related uses; 26 • child care centers; 27 • community facilities such as churches, cemeteries, schools and school facilities co- 28 located with other public facilities such as parks, libraries, and community centers, where 29 feasible and mutually acceptable, fire and police stations; 30 • utility and communication facilities. 31 • support medical facilities such as physician's offices, medical clinics, treatment, research 32 and rehabilitative centers and pharmacies (as long as the dominant use is medical related) 33 may also be permitted provided they are granted concurrent with or located within ¼ mile 34 of existing or approved hospitals or medical centers which offer primary and urgent care 35 treatment for all types of injuries and traumas, such as, Golden Gate Urgent Care. 36 Stipulations to ensure that the construction of such support medical facilities is concurrent 37 with hospitals or such medical centers shall be determined at the time of zoning approval. 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 18 of 64 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 287 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Words underlined are added; words struck-through are deleted. Group Housing shall be permitted within the Urban Mixed Use District and Urban Commercial 1 Districts subject to the definitions and regulations as outlined in the Collier County Land 2 Development Code (Ordinance No. 04-41, adopted June 22, 2004, effective October 18, 2004) 3 and consistent with locational requirements in Florida Statutes (Chapter 419.001 F.S.). 4 Group Housing includes the following type facilities: 5 • Family Care Facility if occupied by not more than six (6) persons shall be permitted in 6 residential areas. 7 • Group Care Facility, 8 • Care Units, 9 • Adult Congregate Living Facilities, and 10 • Nursing Homes. 11 A. Urban-Mixed Use District 12 This district is intended to accommodate a variety of residential and commercial land uses 13 including single-family, multi-family, duplex, and mixed use (Planned Unit Development). 14 1. Urban Residential Subdistrict 15 All land within the urban mixed use designation is zoned and platted. However, any parcel to 16 be rezoned residential is subject to and must be consistent with the Density Rating System: 17 DENSITY RATING SYSTEM: 18 a. BASE DENSITY – Four (4) residential units per gross acre is the eligible density, though 19 not an entitlement. 20 b. DENSITY BONUSES – Density bonuses are discretionary, not entitlements, and are 21 dependent upon meeting the criteria for each bonus provision and compatibility with 22 surrounding properties, as well as the rezone criteria in the Land Development Code. 23 The following densities per gross acre may be added to the base density. In no case 24 shall the maximum permitted density exceed 16 residential dwelling units per gross acre. 25 i. Conversion of Commercial Zoning Bonus 26 • 16 dwelling units – If a project includes the conversion of commercial zoning that 27 has been found to be “Consistent By Policy” through the Collier County Zoning Re-28 evaluation Program (Ordinance No. 90-23), then a bonus of up to 16 dwelling units 29 per acre may be added for every one (1) acre of commercial zoning that is 30 converted to residential zoning. These dwelling units may be distributed over the 31 entire project. 32 ii. Proximity to Activity Center 33 • 3 dwelling units - Within 1 mile of Activity Center 34 iii. Affordable-workforce Housing Bonus 35 As used in this density bonus provision, the term “affordable” shall be as defined in 36 Chapter 420.9071, F.S. To encourage the provision of affordable-workforce housing 37 within certain Districts and Subdistricts in the Urban Designated Area, a maximum of 38 up to 8 residential units per gross acre may be added to the base density if the project 39 meets the requirements of the Affordable-workforce Housing Density Bonus 40 Ordinance (Section 2.06.00 of the Land Development Code, Ordinance #04-41, as 41 42 43 44 Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 19 of 64 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 288 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Words underlined are added; words struck-through are deleted. amended, adopted June 22, 2004 and effective October 18, 2004), and if the 1 affordable-workforce housing units are targeted for families earning no greater than 2 150% of the median income for Collier County. 3 iv. Residential In-fill 4 If the project is 10 acres or less in size; located within an area with central public water 5 and sewer service; compatible with surrounding land uses; has no common site 6 development plan with adjoining property; no common ownership with any adjacent 7 parcels; and the parcel in question was not created to take advantage of the in-fill 8 residential density. 9 • 3 dwelling units 10 v. Roadway Access 11 Density credits based on future roadways will be awarded if the developer commits to 12 construct a portion of the roadway (as determined by the County Transportation 13 Services Division) or the road is scheduled for completion during the first five years of 14 the Capital Improvement Schedule. 15 • Add 1 dwelling unit - if direct access to two or more arterial or collector roads as 16 identified in the Traffic Circulation Element. 17 c. There are Density Bands located around Activity Centers. The density band 18 around an Activity Center shall be measured by the radial distance from the center of the 19 intersection around which the Activity Center is situated. If 50% or more of a project is 20 within the density band, the additional density applies to the entire project. Density bands 21 shall not apply within the Estates Designation. 22 2. High Density Residential Subdistrict: 23 To encourage higher density residential and promote mixed uses in close proximity to Activity 24 Centers, those residential zoned properties permitting up to 12 dwelling units per acre which 25 were located within and consistent with the Activity Center designation at Golden Gate 26 Parkway and Coronado Parkway established by the 1989 Collier County Growth Management 27 Plan and subsequently removed by the creation of a new Activity Center via the adoption of 28 the Golden Gate Area Master Plan are recognized as being consistent with this Master Plan 29 and are outlined on the High Density Residential Subdistrict Map. 30 31 3. Downtown Center Commercial Subdistrict: 32 The primary purpose of the Downtown Center Commercial Subdistrict (see Downtown Center 33 Commercial Subdistrict Map) is to encourage redevelopment along Golden Gate Parkway in 34 order to improve the physical appearance of the area and create a viable downtown district 35 for the residents of Golden Gate City and Golden Gate Estates. Emphasis shall be placed on 36 the creation of pedestrian-oriented areas, such as outdoor dining areas and pocket parks that 37 do not impede the flow of traffic along Golden Gate Parkway. Also, emphasis shall be placed 38 on the construction of mixed-use buildings. 39 Residential dwelling units constructed in this Subdistrict are intended to promote resident-40 business ownership. The provisions of this Subdistrict are intended to ensure harmonious 41 development of commercial and mixed-use buildings at a pedestrian scale that are compatible 42 with residential development within and outside of the Subdistrict. 43 44 45 46 47 48 Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 20 of 64 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 289 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Words underlined are added; words struck-through are deleted. The Subdistrict allows the aggregation of properties in order to promote flexibility in site 1 design. The types of uses permitted within this Subdistrict are low intensity retail, office, 2 personal services, institutional, and residential. Non-residential development is intended to 3 serve the needs of residents within the Subdistrict, surrounding neighborhoods, and 4 passersby. To reduce potential conflicts that may result from residential, commercial and 5 institutional uses in close proximity to one another, existing, non-owner-occupied residential 6 units with frontage on Golden Gate Parkway shall cease to exist no later than seven (7) years 7 after the effective date of the adoption of this Subdistrict. This regulation does not require the 8 removal of residential units located on Golden Gate Parkway that are converted to uses 9 permitted in this Subdistrict within one additional year; nor does this Subdistrict require the 10 removal of residential units located elsewhere in this Subdistrict. 11 A. All development or redevelopment within the boundaries of the Downtown Center 12 Commercial Subdistrict shall include: 13 1. Provisions for bicycle and pedestrian travel. 14 2. An emphasis on building aesthetics. 15 3. Emphasis on the orderly circulation of vehicular, bicycle and pedestrian traffic. 16 4. Provision for broad sidewalks or pathways. 17 5. Enhanced streetscaping. 18 6. Project interconnections, where possible and feasible. 19 7. Quality designs for building façades, including lig hting, uniform signage and 20 landscaping. 21 B. Permitted uses within this Subdistrict shall include only the following, except as may 22 be restricted in an implementing zoning overlay district, and except as may be 23 prohibited in Paragraph D, below: 24 1. Those uses permitted by right within the C-1, C-2 and C-3 Zoning Districts, as 25 outlined in the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC) in effect on the date 26 of adoption of this Subdistrict in the GGAMP; and, 27 2. Residential uses permitted by right in the existing residential zoning districts in this 28 Subdistrict. 29 3. Those permitted uses that may be allowed in an implementing zoning overlay 30 district. 31 C. Conditional uses allowed by this Subdistrict shall include only: 32 1. Those conditional uses allowed within the C-1, C-2 and C-3 Zoning Districts, as 33 outlined in the LDC in effect on the date of adoption of this Subdistrict in the 34 GGAMP; 35 2. Those conditional uses allowed, by the LDC in effect on the date of adoption of 36 this Subdistrict in the GGAMP, within existing residential Zoning Districts in this 37 Subdistrict; 38 3. Those conditional uses that may be allowed in an implementing zoning overlay 39 district; and, 40 4. Outdoor dining areas not directly abutting the Golden Gate Parkway right-of-way. 41 D. Prohibited uses in this Subdistrict are as follows: 42 1. Automatic food and drink vending machines located exterior to a building. 43 2. Any commercial use employing drive-up, drive-in or drive-through delivery of 44 goods or services. 45 46 47 48 Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 21 of 64 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 290 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Words underlined are added; words struck-through are deleted. 3. Enameling, painting or plating as a primary use. However, these uses are 1 permitted if secondary to an artist’s or craft studio. 2 4. Single-room occupancy hotels, prisons, detention facilities, halfway houses, soup 3 kitchens or homeless shelters. 4 5. Uses as may be prohibited in an implementing zoning overlay district. 5 E. For multi-story buildings: 6 1. Retail, personal service, and institutional uses are allowed on the first floor; 7 2. All uses allowed by this Subdistrict, except restaurants and cocktail lounges, are 8 allowed on the second floor; and, 9 3. Only residential uses are allowed on the third floor. 10 F. All development and redevelopment on property abutting Golden Gate Parkway shall 11 have a zero (0) foot front yard setback requirement. 12 G. Parking regulations shall be as follows: 13 1. A minimum of three (3) public parking spaces for each 1,000 square feet of 14 commercial floor area. 15 2. A minimum of 1 ½ parking spaces for each residential unit. 16 3. No parking is allowed in the front yard on lots abutting Golden Gate Parkway. 17 4. There shall be no parking requirement for outdoor restaurant seating areas. 18 5. Shared parking is required, where possible and feasible. 19 B. Urban Commercial District 20 21 1. Mixed Use Activity Center Subdistrict 22 The Activity Center designated on the Future Land Use Map is intended to accommodate 23 commercial zoning within the Urban Designated Area. Activity Centers are intended to be 24 mixed-use (commercial, residential, institutional) in character. The Activity Center concept is 25 designed to concentrate new and existing commercial zoning in locations where traffic impacts 26 can readily be accommodated, to avoid strip and disorganized patterns of commercial 27 development, and to create focal points within the community. The size and configuration of 28 the Activity Center is outlined on the Urban Mixed Use Activity Center – Golden Gate Parkway 29 and Coronado Parkway Map. 30 The standard for intensity of commercial uses allowed within each Activity Center is the full 31 array of uses allowed in the C-1 through C-5 Zoning Districts as identified in the Land 32 Development Code (Ordinance No. 04-41, adopted June 22, 2004 and effective October 18, 33 2004). Hotels and motels that locate within an Activity Center will be allowed to develop at a 34 density consistent with the Land Development Code. Residential density for residential 35 projects located within the boundaries of the Mixed Use Activity Center shall be allowed to 36 develop at a density of up to 16 residential units per gross acre. This density may be 37 distributed throughout the project, including any portion located outside of the boundary of the 38 Mixed Use Activity Center. 39 40 2. Golden Gate Urban Commercial In-fill Subdistrict 41 This Subdistrict is located at the southwest quadrant of C.R. 951 and Golden Gate Parkway. 42 Due to the existing zoning and land use pattern in proximity to the Commercial In -fill 43 Subdistrict (see Golden Gate Urban Commercial Infill Subdistrict and Golden Gate Estates 44 Commercial Infill Subdistrict Map) and the need to ensure adequate development standards 45 to buffer adjacent land uses, commercial uses shall be permitted under the following criteria: 46 47 Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 22 of 64 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 291 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Words underlined are added; words struck-through are deleted. a) Commercial uses shall be limited to: 1 • Low intensity commercial uses that are compatible with both residential and 2 intermediate commercial uses, in order to provide for small scale shopping and 3 personal needs, and 4 • Intermediate commercial to provide for a wider variety of goods and services in 5 areas that have a higher degree of automobile traffic. These uses shall be similar 6 to C-1, C-2, or C-3 zoning districts outlined in the Collier County Land Development 7 Code (Ordinance 91-102), adopted October 30, 1991. 8 b) Rezones shall be encouraged in the form of a Planned Unit Development (there 9 shall be no minimum acreage requirement for PUD rezones except for the requirement 10 that all requests for rezoning must be at least forty thousand (40,000) square feet in 11 area unless the proposed rezone is an extension of an existing zoning district 12 consistent with the Golden Gate Area Master Plan); 13 c) Projects within this Subdistrict shall make provisions for shared parking 14 arrangements with adjoining commercial developments when appropriate. 15 d) Driveways and curb cuts for projects within this Subdistrict shall be consolidated 16 with adjoining commercial developments. 17 e) Access to projects shall not be permitted from Collier Boulevard. 18 19 3. Santa Barbara Commercial Subdistrict 20 The boundaries of the Subdistrict are hereby expanded to include the former Commercial 21 Subdistrict and also to extend approximately one (1) block to the east of the former boundary 22 (see Santa Barbara Commercial Subdistrict Map). The intent of the Santa Barbara 23 Commercial Subdistrict is to provide Golden Gate City with an area that is primarily 24 commercial, with an allowance for certain conditional uses. The types of uses permitted within 25 this Subdistrict are low intensity retail, offices, personal services, and I institutional uses, such 26 as churches and day care centers. Such development is intended to serve the needs of 27 residents within the Subdistrict and surrounding neighborhoods and persons traveling nearby. 28 Commercial and institutional uses permitted within this Subdistrict are those that: 29 • Generate/attract relatively low traffic volumes; 30 • Are appropriately landscaped and buffered to protect nearby residential properties; 31 • Are architecturally designed to be compatible with nearby residential areas; and, 32 • Limit access and traffic flow to or from Santa Barbara Boulevard. 33 This Subdistrict is intended to promote commercial and institutional development 34 opportunities. Therefore, in order to reduce the potential conflicts that may result from 35 residential, commercial and institutional uses in close proximity, existing residential uses shall 36 cease to exist no later than seven (7) years after the effective date of the adoption of the 37 revised Subdistrict boundaries. This does not require the removal of the residential structures 38 if they can be, and are, converted to uses permitted in this Subdistrict, within one additional 39 year. The requirement to cease existing residential uses does not apply to owner-occupied 40 dwelling units. 41 42 43 44 45 46 Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 23 of 64 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 292 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Words underlined are added; words struck-through are deleted. Within one year of the effective date of the adoption of the revised Subdistrict boundaries, the 1 Land Development Code shall be amended to provide specific uses and development 2 standards to implement the revised Subdistrict. These shall include, but not necessarily be 3 limited to: 4 1. Landscaping and buffering requirements. 5 2. Water management provisions. 6 3. Architectural design standards. 7 4. Prohibition of automobile service stations and similar repair facilities. This does not 8 preclude convenience marts with gasoline pumps. 9 5. Encouragement of shared parking and access with adjacent projects, wherever 10 possible. 11 6. Provisions allowing local street vacation or relocation, if alternate access is provided. 12 7. A minimum project size of one acre. 13 8. Encouragement of submittal of proposed development in the form of a PUD Zoning 14 District. 15 9. Provisions for sidewalks and coordination of sidewalk location between adjacent 16 properties. 17 10. Signage restrictions. 18 11. Building height limitation of two stories, not to exceed a maximum of 35 feet. 19 12. Variance provisions applicable to the above items, except items 4, 6, 9, and 11. 20 21 4. Golden Gate Parkway Professional Office Commercial Subdistrict 22 The provisions of this Subdistrict (see Golden Gate Parkway Professional Office Commercial 23 Subdistrict Map) are intended to provide Golden Gate City with a viable professional office 24 district with associated small-scale retail as identified under item A, below. This Subdistrict 25 has two purposes: 26 • to serve as a bona-fide entry way into Golden Gate City; and 27 • to provide a community focal point and sense of place. 28 The uses permitted within this district are generally low intensity, office development, 29 associated retail uses, and community facility uses, such as churches, which will minimize 30 vehicular traffic, provide suitable landscaping, control ingress and egress, and ensure 31 compatibility with abutting residential uses. 32 A. For projects contained wholly within the original Professional Office Commercial 33 Subdistrict with a minimum depth of 150 feet as measured from the property line 34 adjacent and parallel with Golden Gate Parkway, the following small-scale retail uses are 35 permitted: 36 1. Apparel and accessory stores. 37 2. Auto and home supply stores (Auto accessory dealers-retail, automobile parts 38 dealers-retail and speed shops-retail only). 39 3. Eating places (except carry-out establishments, drive-through only 40 establishments, commissary restaurants, concession stands, contract feeding, 41 food service-institutional, hamburger stands, hot-dog stands, Ice cream stands, 42 Industrial feeding, refreshment stands, snack shops, soft drink stands and tea 43 rooms). 44 Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 24 of 64 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 293 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Words underlined are added; words struck-through are deleted. 1 4. Food stores (except Convenience Food stores-retail, grocery stores and 2 supermarkets). 3 5. General merchandise stores. 4 6. Home furniture, furnishing, and equipment stores. 5 7. Libraries. 6 8. Miscellaneous repair services (no electronic repair, except computer repair only in 7 conjunction with sales). 8 9. Miscellaneous retail. 9 10. Paint, glass, and wallpaper stores. 10 11. Personal services (except coin operated laundries, beauty shops and 11 barbershops). 12 12. United States Postal Service. 13 B. Properties that qualify under item A, above, will be subject to the following: 14 All uses listed shall be in accordance with the Standard Industrial Classification Codes 15 within the C-2 zoning district as identified in the Collier County Land Development Code 16 with the exceptions noted above. Item A.2, above, shall be consistent with the LDC uses 17 listed in the C-3 zoning district with the exceptions noted above. 18 Ordering devices and/or order windows at fast food restaurants shall not be visible from 19 Golden Gate Parkway. 20 Vehicular access through adjacent properties to 53rd Street SW may by allowed at time of 21 rezone upon completion of appropriate cross access easements. 22 Any property line of the subject parcel that is immediately adjacent to single family 23 residential must provide a minimum Type “C” landscape buffer as indicated in the Collier 24 County Land Development Code. 25 Buildings utilizing second story office or retail, or a combination thereof, may request up 26 to 35’ in height, subject to architectural design elements incorporated through the rezone 27 process. Buildings will be limited to two stories in height with no parking under the building. 28 All buildings shall provide a common theme incorporating architecture and project 29 signage. 30 31 5. Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict 32 The primary purpose of the Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict (see Collier Boulevard 33 Commercial Subdistrict Map) is to encourage redevelopment along Collier Boulevard in order 34 to improve the physical appearance of the area. This Subdistrict is intended to allow a mix of 35 uses, including heavy commercial within those areas presently zoned C-5. 36 This Subdistrict includes properties zoned RMF-12, C-4, and C-5. This Subdistrict will allow 37 commercial development on lands presently zoned residential. 38 Buildings shall be limited to three stories, not to exceed 50 feet, inclusive of under building 39 parking. 40 Within one year of the effective date of this Subdistrict, the Land Development Code shall be 41 amended to establish a zoning overlay containing regulations to implement this Subdistrict. 42 43 44 Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 25 of 64 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 294 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Words underlined are added; words struck-through are deleted. 1 A. All development and redevelopment within this Subdistrict shall include: 2 1. Provisions for bicycle and pedestrian travel. 3 2. An emphasis on building aesthetics. 4 3. Emphasis on the orderly circulation of vehicular, bicycle and pedestrian traffic. 5 4. Provision for adequate ingress and egress, which may include local street vacation 6 or relocation if alternative access is provided. 7 5. Provision for broad sidewalks or pathways. 8 6. Enhanced streetscaping. 9 7. Shared parking and/or property interconnections, where possible and feasible. 10 8. Quality designs for building facades, including lighting, uniform signage and 11 landscaping. 12 2. ESTATES DESIGNATION 13 This designation is characterized by low density semi-rural residential lots with limited 14 opportunities for other land uses. Typical lots are 2.25 acres in size. However, there are some 15 legal non-conforming lots as small as 1.14 acres. Residential density is limited to a maximum of 16 one unit per 2.25 gross acres, or one unit per legal non-conforming lot of record, exclusive of 17 guesthouses. Multiple family dwelling units, duplexes, and other structures containing two or 18 more principal dwellings, are prohibited in all Districts and Subdistricts in this Designation. 19 Generally, the Estates Designation also accommodates future non-residential uses, including: 20 ● Conditional uses and essential services as defined in the Land Development Code, 21 except as prohibited in the Neighborhood Center Subdistrict. Also, refer to the 22 Conditional Uses Subdistrict. 23 ● Parks, open space and recreational uses. 24 ● Group Housing shall be permitted subject to the definitions and regulations as outlined in 25 the Collier County Land Development Code (Ordinance No. 04-41, adopted June 22, 26 2004, effective October 18, 2004) and consistent with locational requirements in Florida 27 Statutes (Chapter 419.001 F.S.). 28 ● Schools and school facilities in the Estates Designation north of I-75, and where feasible 29 and mutually acceptable, co-locate schools with other public facilities, such as parks, 30 libraries and community centers to the extent possible. 31 Group Housing includes the following type facilities: 32 • Family Care Facility if occupied by not more than six (6) persons shall be permitted in 33 residential areas. 34 • Group Care Facility, 35 • Care Units, 36 • Adult Congregate Living Facilities, and 37 • Nursing Homes. 38 All of the above uses shall be consistent with all of the Goals, Objectives and Policies of the 39 Golden Gate Area Master Plan. 40 41 42 43 Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 26 of 64 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 295 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Words underlined are added; words struck-through are deleted. 1 A. Estates ‒ Mixed Use District 2 3 1. Residential Estates Subdistrict 4 Single-family residential development is allowed within this Subdistrict at a maximum density 5 of one unit per 2.25 gross acres, or one unit per legal non-conforming lot of record, exclusive 6 of guesthouses. 7 2. Neighborhood Center Subdistrict 8 Recognizing the need to provide basic goods, services and amenities to Estates residents, 9 Neighborhood Centers have been designated on the Golden Gate Area Future Land Use Map. 10 The Neighborhood Center designation does not guarantee that commercial zoning will be 11 granted. The designation only provides the opportunity to request commercial zoning. 12 a) The Collier County Land Development Code shall be amended to provide rural 13 design criteria to regulate all new commercial development within Neighborhood 14 Centers. 15 b) Locations 16 Neighborhood Centers are located along major roadways and are distributed within 17 Golden Gate Estates according to commercial demand estimates. (See Golden Gate 18 Estates Neighborhood Centers Map). The centers are designed to concentrate all 19 new commercial zoning, and conditional uses, as allowed in the Estates Zoning 20 District, in locations where traffic impacts can be readily accommodated and to avoid 21 strip and disorganized patterns of commercial and conditional use development. 22 Four Neighborhood Centers are established as follows: 23 ● Wilson Boulevard and Golden Gate Boulevard Center. 24 This center consists of three quadrants at the intersection of Wilson and Golden 25 Gate Boulevards (See Map 10). The NE and SE quadrants of the Center consist 26 of Tract 1 and 2, Unit 14, Tract 17, Unit 13 and the western half of Tract 18, Unit 27 13 Golden Gate Estates. The NE quadrant of Wilson and Golden Gate Boulevards 28 is approximately 8.45 acres. The parcels within the NE quadrant shall be 29 interconnected and share access to Golden Gate Boulevard and Wilson Boulevard 30 to minimize connections to these two major roadways. The SE quadrant of Wilson 31 and Golden Gate Boulevards is 7.15 acres, allows 5.00 acres of commercial 32 development, and allocates 2.15 acres to project buffering and right-of-way for 33 Golden Gate Boulevard and Wilson Boulevard. The SW quadrant of the Center is 34 approximately 4.86 acres in size and consists of Tract 125, Unit 12 of Golden Gate 35 Estates. 36 ● Collier Boulevard and Pine Ridge Road Center. 37 The center at Collier Boulevard and Pine Ridge Road is located on both sides of 38 the intersection. Tracts 109-114, Unit 26, Golden Gate Estates are included in this 39 center as eligible for commercial development. (See Collier Boulevard/Pine Ridge 40 Road Center Map). The E1/2 of Tract 107, Unit 26 is also included within this 41 center but is only to be used for buffer, water management and open space. 42 ● Everglades Boulevard and Golden Gate Boulevard Center. 43 This Center consists of all four quadrants at the intersection of Everglades and 44 Golden Gate Boulevards (See Golden Gate Boulevard/Everglades Boulevard 45 Center Map). The NE quadrant of the Center is approximately 5.46 acres in size 46 47 48 Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 27 of 64 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 296 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Words underlined are added; words struck-through are deleted. 1 and consists of Tract 1, Unit 77 of Golden Gate Estates. The SE quadrant of the 2 Center is approximately 5.46 acres in size and consists of Tract 97, Unit 81 of 3 Golden Gate Estates. The NW quadrant of the Center is approximately 5.46 acres 4 in size and consists of Tract 128, Unit 76 of Golden Gate Estates. The SW 5 quadrant of the Center is approximately 5.46 acres in size and consists of Tract 6 96, Unit 81 of Golden Gate Estates. 7 ● The Immokalee Road and Everglades Boulevard Center is located in the 8 southwest and the southeast quadrants of the intersection. This Center consists 9 of three Tracts: Tract 128, Unit 47, is 5.15 + acres and is located within the 10 southwest quadrant of the Center, south of the fire station; and, Tracts 113 and 16, 11 Unit 46, are 4.05 +acres and 5.15 + acres respectively, and are within the 12 southeast quadrant of the Center, east of the fire station. 13 c) Criteria for land uses at the centers are as follows: 14 ● Commercial uses shall be limited to intermediate commercial so as to provide for 15 a wider variety of goods and services in areas that have a higher degree of 16 automobile traffic. These uses shall be similar to C-1, C-2, or C-3 zoning districts 17 outlined in the Collier County Land Development Code (Ordinance No. 04-41, 18 adopted June 22, 2004, effective October 18, 2004), except as prohibited below. 19 ● The Neighborhood Center located at the intersection of Pine Ridge Road and 20 Collier Boulevard may be developed at 100% commercial and must provide 21 internal circulation. Any rezoning is encouraged to be in the form of a PUD. This 22 Neighborhood Center may also be utilized for single-family residential or 23 conditional uses allowed in the Estates zoning district such as churches, social or 24 fraternal organizations, childcare centers, schools, and group care facilities. 25 ● Parcels immediately adjacent to commercial zoning within the Neighborhood 26 Centers located at the intersections Golden Gate Boulevard and Wilson Boulevard 27 (excluding the SW quadrant), Golden Gate Boulevard and Everglades Boulevard, 28 Everglades Boulevard and Immokalee Road may qualify for Conditional Use under 29 the transitional conditional use provision of the Conditional Uses Subdistrict of this 30 Master Plan Element. 31 • A single project shall utilize no more than 50% of the total allowed commercial 32 acreage. This percentage may be increased at the discretion of the Board of 33 County Commissioners. 34 • The project shall make provisions for shared parking arrangements with adjoining 35 developments. 36 • Access points shall be limited to one per 180 feet commencing from the right-of-37 way of the major intersecting streets of the Neighborhood Center. A maximum of 38 three curb cuts per quadrant shall be allowed. 39 • Driveways and curb cuts shall be consolidated with adjoining developments, 40 whenever possible. 41 • Driveways accessing parcels on opposite sides of the roadway shall be in direct 42 alignment, except when the roadway median between the two parcels has no 43 opening. 44 45 46 47 48 Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 28 of 64 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 297 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Words underlined are added; words struck-through are deleted. ● Projects shall provide a 25-foot wide landscape buffer abutting the external 1 right-of-way. This buffer shall contain two staggered rows of trees that shall be 2 spaced no more than 30 feet on center, and a double row hedge at least 24 inches 3 in height at time of planting and attaining a minimum of three feet height within one 4 year. A minimum of 50% of the 25-foot wide buffer area shall be comprised of a 5 meandering bed of shrubs and ground covers other than grass. Existing native 6 trees must be retained within this 25-foot wide buffer area to aid in achieving this 7 buffer requirement; other existing native vegetation shall be retained, where 8 possible, to aid in achieving this buffer requirement. Water retention/detention 9 areas shall be allowed in this buffer area if left in natural state, and drainage 10 conveyance through the buffer area shall be allowed if necessary to reach an 11 external outfall. 12 ● For Tract 114, Golden Gate Estates, Unit 26, access shall be restricted to 11 th 13 Avenue S.W. Also, vehicular interconnection shall be provided to the adjacent 14 property(s) in the Pine Ridge Road/Collier Boulevard Neighborhood Center. 15 ● All buildings shall have tile roofs, ‘Old Style Florida’ metal roofs, or decorative 16 parapet walls above the roofline. The buildings shall be finished in light, subdued 17 colors, except for decorative trim. 18 • Building heights shall be limited to one (1) story, with a maximum height of thirty-19 five (35) feet. This provision only applies east of Collier Boulevard. 20 • All lighting facilities shall be architecturally–designed, and shall be limited to a 21 height of twenty-five (25) feet. Such lighting facilities shall be shielded from 22 neighboring residential land uses. 23 • Commercial uses shall encourage pedestrian traffic through placement of 24 sidewalks, pedestrian walkways, and marked crosswalks within parking areas. 25 Adjacent projects shall coordinate placement of sidewalks so that a continuous 26 pathway through the Neighborhood Center is created. 27 • All buildings and projects within any single specific quadrant of the Subdistrict shall 28 utilize a common architectural theme. This theme shall be applicable to both 29 building design and signage. 30 • No building footprint shall exceed 5,000 square feet, unless the project is submitted 31 in the form of a PUD. Walkways or courtyards shall connect adjacent buildings. 32 This provision only applies east of Collier Boulevard. 33 • Drive-through establishments shall be limited to banks, with no more than 3 lanes; 34 the drive-through areas shall be architecturally integrated with the rest of the 35 building. This provision only applies east of Collier Boulevard. 36 • Fences or walls may be constructed on the commercial side of the required 37 landscape buffer between adjacent commercial and residential uses. If 38 constructed, such fences or walls shall not exceed five (5) feet in height. Walls 39 shall be constructed of brick or stone. Fences shall be of wood or concrete post 40 or rail types, and shall be of open design (not covered by slats, boards or wire). 41 • Projects directly abutting residential property (property zoned E-Estates and 42 without an approved conditional use) shall provide, at a minimum, a seventy-five 43 (75) feet wide buffer in which no parking uses are permitted. Twenty-five (25) 44 45 46 47 48 Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 29 of 64 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 298 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Words underlined are added; words struck-through are deleted. feet of the width of the buffer along the developed area shall be a landscape buffer. 1 A minimum of fifty (50) feet of the buffer width shall consist of retained native 2 vegetation and must be consistent with subsection 3.9.5.5.6 of the Collier County 3 Land Development Code (LDC). The native vegetation retention area may consist 4 of a perimeter berm and be used for water management detention. Any newly 5 constructed berm shall be revegetated to meet subsection 3.9.5.5.6 of the LDC 6 (native vegetation replanting requirements). Additionally, in order to be considered 7 for approval, use of the native vegetation retention area for water management 8 purposes shall meet the following criteria: 9 a. There shall be no adverse impacts to the native vegetation being retained. The 10 additional water directed to this area shall not increase the annual hydro-period 11 unless it is proven that such would have no adverse impact to the existing 12 vegetation. 13 b. If the project requires permitting by the South Florida Water Management 14 District, the project shall provide a letter or official document from the District 15 indicating that the native vegetation within the retention area will not have to 16 be removed to comply with water management requirements. If the District 17 cannot or will not supply such a letter, then the native vegetation retention area 18 shall not be used for water management. 19 c. If the project is reviewed by Collier County, the County engineer shall provide 20 evidence that no removal of native vegetation is necessary to facilitate the 21 necessary storage of water in the water management area. 22 ● Projects within the Neighborhood Center Subdistrict that are submitted as 23 PUDs shall provide a functional public open-space component. Such public open-24 space shall be developed as green space within a pedestrian-accessible 25 courtyard, as per Section 2.4.5.4 of the Collier County Land Development Code, 26 as in effect at the time of P.U.D. approval. 27 ● The following principal permitted uses are prohibited within Neighborhood 28 Centers: 29 Drinking Places (5813) and Liquor Stores (5921) 30 Mail Order Houses (5961) 31 Merchandizing Machine Operators (5962) 32 Power Laundries (7211) 33 Crematories (7261) (Does not include non-crematory Funeral Parlors) 34 Radio, TV Representatives (7313) and Direct Mail Advertising Services 35 (7331) 36 NEC Recreational Shooting Ranges, Waterslides, etc. (7999) 37 General Hospitals (8062), Psychiatric Hospitals (8063), and Specialty 38 Hospitals (8069) 39 Elementary and Secondary Schools (8211), Colleges (8221), Junior Colleges 40 (8222) 41 Libraries (8231) 42 Correctional Institutions (9223) 43 Waste Management (9511) 44 Homeless Shelters and Soup Kitchens. 45 ● The following additional restrictions and standards apply to Tract 124 and the 46 north 150 feet of Tract 126, within the southwest quadrant of the Wilson Boulevard 47 and Golden Gate Boulevard Center: 48 49 50 Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 30 of 64 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 299 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Words underlined are added; words struck-through are deleted. a. Commercial uses shall be limited to the following: 1 1. medical offices and clinics and professional offices, except surveyors; and, 2 2. medical related uses, such as a wellness center. 3 b. The ordinance rezoning this property to allow commercial uses shall include 4 the following requirements: 5 1. no less than sixty percent (60%) of the gross square footage shall be 6 designated for medical offices and clinics; and, 7 2. parking for the entire project shall be that required for medical office or clinic 8 use by the Land Development Code (Ordinance No. 04-41, as amended), 9 so as to allow 100 percent medical office use. 10 c. Parking lot lighting shall be restricted to bollards except as may be required to 11 comply with lighting standards in the Land Development Code (Ordinance No. 12 04-41, as amended) and other governing regulations. 13 d. The Neighborhood Center boundaries of this quadrant shall not be further 14 expanded. 15 3. Conditional Uses Subdistrict 16 Various types of conditional uses are permitted in the Estates zoning district within the Golden 17 Gate Estates area. In order to control the location and spacing of new conditional uses, one 18 of the following four sets of criteria shall be met: 19 a) Essential Services Conditional Use Provisions: 20 Those Essential Services Conditional Uses, as identified within Section 2.01.03 G. of 21 the Collier County Land Development Code, may be allowed anywhere within the 22 Estates Zoning District, except as prohibited in certain Neighborhood Centers, and are 23 defined as: 24 • electric or gas generating plants, 25 • effluent tanks, 26 • major re-pump stations, 27 • sewage treatment plants, including percolation ponds, 28 • hospitals and hospices, 29 • water aeration or treatment plants, 30 ● governmental facilities (except for those Permitted Uses identified in Section 31 2.01.03 of the Land Development Code), 32 • public water supply acquisition, withdrawal, or extraction facilities, and 33 • public safety service facilities, and other similar facilities. 34 b) Golden Gate Parkway and Collier Boulevard Special Provisions: 35 ● Conditional uses shall not be permitted on those parcels immediately adjacent to 36 the west side of Collier Boulevard within the Estates Designated Area except 37 where the parcel is directly bounded by conditional uses on two (2) or more side 38 yards with no intervening rights-of-ways or waterways; and, except as provided in 39 subparagraph 2., below; and, except for essential services, as described in 40 paragraph a), above. 41 42 43 44 45 Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 31 of 64 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 300 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Words underlined are added; words struck-through are deleted. 1 ● Recognizing the existing residential nature of the land uses surrounding the I -75 2 interchange at Golden Gate Parkway, there shall be no further conditional uses for 3 properties abutting Golden Gate Parkway, between Livingston Road and Santa 4 Barbara Boulevard, except as permitted within the Golden Gate Parkway 5 Institutional Subdistrict; except as provided in paragraph 3.b)3., below; and, except 6 as provided in subparagraph 1., below; and, except for essential services, as 7 described in paragraph a), above. 8 ● Further, no properties abutting streets accessing Golden Gate Parkway, between 9 Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard, shall be approved for conditional 10 uses except as permitted within the Golden Gate Parkway Institutional 11 Subdistrict; and, except as provided in subparagraph 1., below; and, except for 12 essential services, as described in paragraph a), above. This provision shall not 13 be construed to affect the area described in Paragraph a), above. 14 1. In consideration of the improvements associated with the interchange at 15 Interstate 75 and Golden Gate Parkway, the existing conditional use (church 16 and related facilities) located at the southeast corner of Golden Gate Parkway 17 and 66th Street S.W. may be expanded in acreage and intensity along the 18 south side of Golden Gate Parkway to the east of 66th Street S.W., but the 19 total project area shall not exceed approximately 9.22 acres (see Golden 20 Gate Parkway Interchange Conditional Uses Area Map). 21 2. The parcel located immediately south of the Commercial Western Estates Infill 22 Subdistrict, on the west side of Collier Boulevard, and at the southwest 23 quadrant of the intersection of Vanderbilt Beach Road and Collier Boulevard, 24 shall be eligible for a transitional conditional use designation. 25 3. Conditional use for expansion of the existing educational and charitable social 26 organization (Naples Bridge Center) is allowed on the east 150 feet of Tract 75 27 and the west 150 feet of Tract 82, Unit 30, Golden Gate Estates. The maximum 28 building area permitted on the two parcels shall be limited to 15,000 square 29 feet. Use of Tract 82 shall be limited to parking, water management and open 30 space uses. See Conditional Uses Subdistrict Golden Gate Parkway Special 31 Provisions map. 32 c) Neighborhood Center Transitional Conditional Use Provisions: 33 Conditional uses shall be allowed immediately adjacent to designated Neighborhood 34 Centers subject to the following criteria: 35 1. Properties eligible for conditional uses shall abut the arterial or collector road 36 serving the Neighborhood Center, 37 2. Such uses shall be limited to transitional conditional uses that are compatible with 38 both residential and commercial such as churches, social or fraternal 39 organizations, childcare centers, schools, and group care facilities, 40 3. All conditional uses shall make provisions for shared parking arrangements with 41 adjoining developments whenever possible, 42 4. Conditional uses abutting Estates zoned property shall provide, at a minimum, a 43 75-foot buffer of native vegetation in which no parking or water management uses 44 are permitted, 45 46 47 48 49 50 Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 32 of 64 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 301 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Words underlined are added; words struck-through are deleted. 5. Conditional uses adjoining the commercial uses within Neighborhood Centers 1 shall, whenever possible, share parking areas, access and curb cuts with the 2 adjoining commercial use, in order to facilitate traffic movement. 3 d) Transitional Conditional Uses: 4 Conditional uses may be granted in Transitional Areas. A Transitional Area is defined 5 as an area located between existing non-residential and residential areas. The 6 purpose of this provision is to allow conditional uses in areas that are adjacent to 7 existing non-residential uses and are therefore generally not appropriate for residential 8 use. The conditional use will act as a buffer between non-residential and residential 9 areas. 10 The following criteria shall apply for Transitional Conditional Use requests: 11 • Site shall be directly adjacent to a non-residential use (zoned or developed); 12 • Site shall be 2.25 acres, or more, in size or be at least 150 feet in width and sh all 13 not exceed 5 acres; 14 • Conditional uses shall be located on the allowable acreage adjacent to the 15 non-residential use; 16 • Site shall not be adjacent to a church or other place of worship, school, social or 17 fraternal organization, child care center, convalescent home, hospice, rest home, 18 home for the aged, adult foster home, children's home, rehabilitation centers; and 19 • Site shall not be adjacent to parks or open space and recreational uses; 20 • Site shall not be adjacent to permitted Essential Service, as identified in Section 21 2.6.9 of the Land Development Code, except for libraries and museums; and 22 • Project shall provide adequate buffering from adjacent properties allowing 23 residential uses. 24 e) Special Exceptions to Conditional Use Locational Criteria: 25 1. Temporary use (TU) permits for model homes, as defined in the Collier County 26 Land Development Code, may be allowed anywhere within the Estates-Mixed Use 27 District. Conditional use permits for the purpose of extending the time period for 28 use of the structure as a model home shall be required, and shall be subject to the 29 provisions of Section 5.04.04B. and C. of the Collier County Land Development 30 Code, Ordinance No. 04-41, as amended. Such conditional uses shall not be 31 subject to the locational criteria of the Conditional Uses Subdistrict, and may be 32 allowed anywhere within the Estates-Mixed Use District. 33 2. Conditional Use permits for excavation, as provided for in the Estates zoning 34 district, are not subject to the locational criteria for Conditional Uses and may be 35 allowed anywhere within the Estates-Mixed Use District. 36 3. Conditional Use for a church or place of worship, as provided for in the Estates 37 zoning district, is allowed on Tract 22, Golden Gate Estates, Unit 97. 38 4. Conditional Use for a church or place of worship as allowed in the Estates 39 Zoning District is allowed on the north 180 feet of Tract 107, Unit 30, Golden Gate 40 Estates. Church-related day care use shall not be allowed. Development shall be 41 limited to a maximum of 12,000 square feet of floor area. 42 43 44 45 46 47 Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 33 of 64 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 302 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Words underlined are added; words struck-through are deleted. 4. Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict 1 This Subdistrict is specific to Tracts 43, 50, 59, and 66 of Golden Gate Estates Unit 30, and 2 includes four parcels of land containing approximately 16.3 acres, located on the north side 3 of Golden Gate Parkway, east of I-75 and west of Santa Barbara Boulevard. The intent of the 4 Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict is to provide for the continued operation of 5 existing uses, and the development and redevelopment of institutional and related uses. The 6 Subdistrict is intended to be compatible with the neighboring residential uses and will utilize 7 well-planned access points to ensure safe and convenient access onto Golden Gate Parkway. 8 9 The following institutional uses are permitted through the conditional use process within the 10 Subdistrict: 11 a. Churches and other places of worship. 12 b. Group care facilities (Categories I and II) 13 c. Nursing homes and assisted living facilities associated with the David Lawrence 14 Center. 15 d. Essential services as set forth in Section 2.01.03 of the Collier County Land 16 Development Code, Ordinance Number 04-41, as amended. 17 e. Private schools associated with the David Lawrence Center or Parkway Community 18 Church of God, for Tracts 43, 50 and 59 only. 19 f. Day care centers associated with the David Lawrence Center or Parkway Community 20 Church of God. 21 g. Medical offices associated with the David Lawrence Center. 22 5. Mission Subdistrict 23 The Mission Subdistrict is located on the south side of Oil Well Road, approximately one -24 quarter mile west of Everglades Boulevard, and consists of 21.72 acres. The purpose of this 25 Subdistrict is to provide for churches and related uses, including community outreach. The 26 following uses are allowed: 27 a) Churches. 28 b) Child care centers – must be not-for-profit and affiliated with a church within the 29 Subdistrict. 30 c) Private schools – must be not-for-profit and affiliated with a church within the 31 Subdistrict. 32 d) Individual and family social services (activity centers, elderly or handicapped only; day 33 care centers, adult and handicapped only) – must be not-for-profit and affiliated with a 34 church within the Subdistrict. 35 e) Medical outreach to the community, to include activities such as administering 36 influenza vaccine, checking blood pressure, and conducting blood donation drives – 37 must be not-for-profit and affiliated with a church within the Subdistrict. 38 Soup kitchens and homeless shelters are prohibited in this Subdistrict. 39 The maximum total floor area allowed in this Subdistrict is 90,000 square feet. The maximum 40 height of buildings shall be 30 feet zoned height, except the worship center shall be permitted 41 a zoned height of 35 feet. Development in this Subdistrict shall be designed to be compatible 42 with the existing, and allowed future, development in the surrounding area. 43 44 45 46 47 Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 34 of 64 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 303 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Words underlined are added; words struck-through are deleted. In the alternate to the foregoing uses, measures of development intensity, and development 1 standards, this Subdistrict may be developed with single family dwellings in accordance with 2 the Residential Estates Subdistrict. 3 Property adjacent to this Subdistrict shall not qualify for the Transitional Conditional Use. 4 6. Everglades – Randall Subdistrict 5 The Everglades – Randall Subdistrict is located on the northeast corner of Everglades 6 Boulevard and Randall Boulevard, consists of 7.8 acres, and comprises Tract 115 and the 7 east 150 feet of Tract 116, Unit 69, Golden Gate Estates. The purpose of this Subdistrict is to 8 provide for churches and other places of worship and their related uses. 9 10 The following use is permitted within the Subdistrict through the conditional use process: 11 (a) Churches and other places of worship 12 The following church-related uses are prohibited within the Subdistrict: 13 (a) Day care centers 14 (b) Private schools 15 (c) Soup kitchens 16 (d) Homeless shelters 17 The maximum total floor area allowed in this Subdistrict is 20,000 square feet, including no 18 more than 230 seats. The maximum height of buildings shall be 30 feet. Architectural features 19 such as steeples may be a maximum height of 60 feet. 20 For access drives, a throat depth of no less than 30 feet, measured from the roadway edge 21 of the pavement, shall be provided. 22 23 B. Estates – Commercial District 24 25 26 1. Interchange Activity Center Subdistrict 27 On the fringes of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan boundaries, there are several parcels 28 that are located within the Interchange Activity Center #10 at I-75 and Pine Ridge Road as 29 detailed in the County-wide Future Land Use Element (FLUE). Parcels within this Activity 30 Center are subject to the County-wide FLUE and not this Master Plan. See Activity Center 31 and Pine Ridge Road Mixed Use Subdistrict Map for a detailed map of this Activity Center. 32 33 2. Pine Ridge Road Mixed Use Subdistrict 34 This Subdistrict is adjacent to the northwest quadrant of Interchange Activity Center #10, west of 35 the Naples Gateway PUD, and comprises 16.23 acres. It consists of Tracts 1, 12, 13 and 28 of 36 Golden Gate Estates, Unit 35, as recorded in Plat Book 7, Page 85, of the Public Records of 37 Collier County. The intent of the Pine Ridge Road Mixed Use Subdistrict is to allow for a mix of 38 both retail and office uses to provide for shopping and personal services for the surrounding 39 residential areas within a convenient travel distance and to provide commercial services 40 appropriately located along a collector roadway, Livingston Road. Well-planned access points 41 will be used to improve current and future traffic flows in the area. Within this Subdistrict no more 42 than 35,000 square feet of office-related uses on +3.2 acres are permitted within the eastern 43 44 45 46 47 Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 35 of 64 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 304 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Words underlined are added; words struck-through are deleted. portion of this property, which includes a portion of Tract 28 and a portion of Tract 13. A 1 maximum of 80,000 square feet of gross leasable retail or office area, as allowed in the 2 Commercial Intermediate District (C-3) of the Collier County Land Development Code in effect 3 as of the effective date of the adoption of this Subdistrict [Ordinance No. 03-01, adopted 4 January 16, 2003], are permitted within the western 10.52 acres of this property. The C-3 5 uses are not an entitlement. Such uses will be further evaluated at the time of rezoning 6 application to insure appropriateness in relationship to surrounding properties. 7 A rezoning of the western 10.52 acres is encouraged to be in the form of a Planned Unit 8 Development. Regulations for water management, uniform landscaping, signage, screening 9 and buffering will be included in the rezoning ordinance to ensure compatibility with nearby 10 residential areas, and shall be subject to the following additional criteria: 11 • There shall be no access onto Livingston Woods Lane. 12 • Shared access shall be encouraged. 13 • Building heights shall not exceed 35 feet. 14 • There shall be a minimum setback area of 75 feet along the northern property line. 15 • Driveway access, parking, and water management facilities may be allowed within the 16 75 foot setback area along the northern property line, but none of these uses shall be 17 located closer than 30 feet to this line. 18 • No freestanding automobile parking lots, homeless shelters or soup kitchens shall be 19 permitted. 20 • Within the eastern portion of Tract 28, 2.2 acres, more or less, shall be preserved as 21 wetlands and no development shall occur within that area. 22 • Within the western 10.52 acres, a loop road shall be constructed through the property 23 to provide access from Pine Ridge Road to Livingston Road and to reduce traffic at 24 the intersection. 25 See Activity Center and Pine Ridge Road Mixed Use Subdistrict Map for a detailed map of 26 this Subdistrict. 27 28 3. Randall Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict 29 The Randall Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict, containing approximately 56.5 acres, is 30 located on the south side of Randall Boulevard and Immokalee Road (CR-846), extending 31 from 8th Street NE west to the Corkscrew Canal. This Subdistrict is comprised of the following 32 properties: Tracts 54, 55, 71, 72, 89, 90, 107, 108, 125, 126 and 127, Golden Gate Estates, 33 Unit 23. This Subdistrict has been designated on the Golden Gate Area Future Land Use Map 34 and the Randall Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict Map. It is the intent of this Subdistrict to 35 provide commercial goods and services to the surrounding area. 36 All development in the Subdistrict shall comply with the following requirements and limitations: 37 a. All development is encouraged to be in the form of a PUD. 38 b. Projects directly abutting Estates zoned property shall provide, at a minimum, a 75-39 foot wide buffer of retained native vegetation in which no parking or water management 40 uses are permitted; except that, when abutting conditional uses no such buffer is 41 required. 42 c. Shared parking shall be required with adjoining development whenever possible. 43 44 45 46 Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 36 of 64 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 305 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Words underlined are added; words struck-through are deleted. d. Tract 55 shall only be utilized for native preservation and water management areas. 1 The eastern boundary of Tract 55 shall contain, at a minimum, a 50-foot wide retained 2 native vegetation buffer. 3 e. The following limitation shall apply to Tract 71 only: 4 1. Limitation of Uses – Uses shall be limited to the following: 5 • Automobile Service Station; 6 • Barber & Beauty Shops; 7 • Convenience Stores; 8 • Drug Stores; 9 • Food Markets; 10 • Hardware Stores; 11 • Laundries – Self Service Only; 12 • Parks, Public or Private; 13 • Post Offices and Professional Offices; 14 • Repair Shops – Radio, TV, Small Appliances and Shoes; 15 • Restaurants, including fast food restaurants but not drive in restaurants; 16 • All Permitted Uses of the C-2, Convenience Commercial, zoning district in the 17 Collier County Land Development Code, Ordinance 04-41, as amended, as of 18 April 14, 2009; and, 19 • Veterinary Clinic with no outside kenneling; 20 f. The following limitations shall apply to Tracts 72, 89, 90, 107, 108, 125, 126, 127, 21 and Tract 54: 22 1. Development intensity on Tracts 72, 89, 90, 107, 108, 125, 126, 127 and the west 23 one-half of Tract 54 shall be limited to 360,950 square feet of floor area, of which 24 no more than 285,950 square feet shall be retail development. 25 2. Development intensity on the east one-half of Tract 54 shall be limited to 20,000 26 square feet of commercial development. 27 3. The first phase of the project development, exclusive of the existing 20,000 sq. ft. 28 of development on the east one-half of Tract 54, shall include a grocery anchor, 29 with a minimum of 35,000 square feet of gross leasable floor area, prior to any 30 certificates of occupancy being issued beyond 100,000 square feet of commercial 31 development. 32 4. Allowable uses shall be limited to the permitted and conditional uses of the C-4, 33 General Commercial District in the Collier County Land Development Code in 34 effect as of the effective date of the adoption of the amendment of this Subdistrict 35 [Ordinance No. 2010 -32, adopted July 28, 2010], except that the following uses 36 shall be prohibited: 37 • Tire Dealers, Automotive Retail (Group 5531) 38 • Automotive Parking (Group 7521) 39 • Communication Services (Group 4899) 40 • Drinking Places (Group 5813) 41 42 43 44 Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 37 of 64 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 306 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Words underlined are added; words struck-through are deleted. • Fishing Piers (Group 7999) 1 • Glass and Glazing work (Group 1793) 2 • Health Services (Groups 8059 - 8069) 3 • Specialty Outpatient Facilities (Group 8093) 4 • Houseboat Rental, Lakes Operations, Party and Pleasure Boat rental (Group 5 7999) 6 • Large Appliance repair service (Group 7623) 7 • Marinas (Group 4493 and 4499) 8 • Miscellaneous Repair Services (Groups 7622-7641, 7699) 9 • Liquor Store, unless operated by a Grocery Retailer (Group 5921) 10 • Used Merchandise Store (Group 5932) 11 • Automatic Merchandising Machine Operators (Group 5962) 12 • Direct Selling Establishment (Group 5963) 13 • Escort Services, Massage Parlors, Tattoo Parlors, Turkish Baths, Wedding 14 Chapels (Group 7299) 15 • Betting Information Services, Bath Houses, Billiard Parlors, Bookies and 16 Bookmakers, Cable lifts, Carnival Operation, Circus Companies, Fortune 17 Tellers, Go-cart racing operation, Off-track betting, Ping Pong Parlors, Rodeo 18 Animal Rentals, Rodeos, Shooting Ranges, Trapshooting Facilities (Group 19 7999) 20 • Parole offices, Probation offices, Public welfare centers, refugee services, 21 settlement houses (Group 8322) 22 • Tow-in parking lots (Groups 7514, 7515, 7521) 23 • Animal Specialty Services (Group 0752) 24 5. At time of rezoning, consideration shall be given to imposing appropriate 25 restrictions on the amount of development allowed in this Subdistrict prior to 26 discontinuance and relocation of the Big Corkscrew Island Fire Station and Florida 27 Division of Forestry fire tower uses. 28 6. All buildings on Tracts 72, 89, 90, 107, 108, 125, 126 and 127 shall be developed 29 with a unified architectural theme. 30 7. Excluding the commercial zoning on Tract 71 and the existing approved 31 commercial zoning on the east one-half of Tract 54, any additional development in 32 the Subdistrict shall be developed in phases. Phase I shall be limited to 100,000 33 square feet of gross leasable floor area. Subsequent phases shall not receive 34 building permits until the Randall Boulevard/Immokalee Road intersection project, 35 including the widening of the segment of Randall Boulevard abutting the 36 Subdistrict, as shown on Exhibit “A” of the Developer Contribution Agreement 37 adopted July 28, 2010 by the Board of County Commissioners, has commenced. 38 No Certificates of Occupancy shall be issued for subsequent development phases 39 until the Randall Boulevard/Immokalee Road intersection project is substantially 40 complete. Neither the building permits limitations nor the Certificates of 41 Occupancy limitations shall apply if satisfactory alternative mitigation is approved 42 by the Board of County Commissioners pursuant to Transportation Element Policy 43 5.1, or if traffic conditions change in such a manner that adequate capacity is 44 available. 45 46 47 Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 38 of 64 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 307 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Words underlined are added; words struck-through are deleted. 4. Commercial Western Estates Infill Subdistrict 1 The purpose of the Subdistrict is to allow for limited commercial and/or medical office uses, in 2 recognition of the subject property's unsuitability for single-family residential development. 3 Limited commercial and/or medical uses at this location will also assist in reducing the 4 distance and the number of vehicular trips generated within the general area through trip 5 capture. The standards contained in this Subdistrict are designed to ensure that uses within 6 the Subdistrict will be compatible with nearby residential development. A loop road shall be 7 required through the property to connect Vanderbilt Beach Road with Collier Boulevard will 8 also serve to lessen vehicular trips through the intersection. 9 10 a) Size and Location: 11 The Subdistrict includes a 6.23-acre parcel, located at the southwest corner of 12 Vanderbilt Beach Road and Collier Boulevard (see Commercial Western Estates Infill 13 Subdistrict Map). The parcel is identified as Tract 105, Unit 2, Golden Gate Estates. 14 b) Permitted Uses and Development Intensity: 15 Within the subject property, 3.93 acres of office/medical use is permitted with a 16 maximum of forty-one thousand four hundred and ninety (41,490) square feet of gross 17 leaseable area permitted or approximately 6,660 square feet per gross acre. The 18 balance of the area, comprising +2.3 acres, shall remain in open space. Uses allowed 19 within this Subdistrict shall be those office uses, medical uses, and financial institutions 20 permitted whether by right or by conditional use, within the C-1 zoning district, as 21 contained in the Collier County Land Development Code, Ordinance 91-102, as of the 22 effective date of the adoption of this Subdistrict [Ordinance No. 03-01, adopted 23 January 16, 2003]. 24 c) Development Standards: 25 1. All permitted uses within this Subdistrict shall be encouraged to be submitted in 26 the form of a Planned Unit Development (P.U.D.) for the subject property with 27 special attention to be provided for shared access, water management, uniform 28 landscaping, signage, screening and buffering to ensure compatibility with nearby 29 residential areas. 30 2. Building height shall be limited to two stories, with a maximum height of thirty (30) 31 feet, except that portions of the property within one hundred (100) feet of the buffer 32 described in item #3, below, shall be limited to one story with a maximum height of 33 twenty-five (25) feet. 34 3. There shall be a setback of seventy-five (75) feet in width abutting Estates-zoned 35 property. Where feasible, existing native vegetation shall be retained within this 36 setback area. Water retention/detention areas shall be allowed in this setback 37 area provided that the area is left in a natural state, and drainage conveyance 38 through the setback area shall be allowed, as necessary, in order for stormwater 39 to reach an external outfall. 40 4. The buffer area along Collier Boulevard/CR-951 and Vanderbilt Beach Road shall 41 be 25 feet in width and shall conform to the vegetative requirements of a Type "B" 42 buffer as provided for in the Collier County Land Development Code, in effect as 43 of the date of adoption of this amendment [Ordinance No. 03-01, adopted January 44 16, 2003]. 45 46 47 48 49 50 Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 39 of 64 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 308 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Words underlined are added; words struck-through are deleted. 5. A loop road shall be constructed, internal to the subject property. This road 1 shall be open to the public, in order to connect Vanderbilt Beach Road and Collier 2 Boulevard, so as to provide an alternative to use of the intersection. 3 6. The maximum gross leaseable floor area of each individual office/medical/financial 4 building footprint shall be 6,000 square feet. However, buildings may be connected 5 by architectural treatments, and shall be designed to appear similar to residential 6 structures through the treatment of rooflines and other architectural 7 embellishments. 8 7. No development of property within the Subdistrict shall commence until the 9 abutting segment of Collier Boulevard is four-laned. 10 11 5. Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict 12 This Subdistrict consists of two infill areas. The two areas are located at the northwest corner 13 of Collier Boulevard and Green Boulevard and at the northwest corner of Santa Barbara 14 Boulevard and Golden Gate Parkway. Due to the existing zoning and land use pattern in 15 proximity to the Estates Commercial In-fill Subdistrict (see Golden Gate Urban Commercial 16 Infill Subdistrict and Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict Map) and the need to 17 ensure adequate development standards to buffer adjacent land uses, commercial uses shall 18 be permitted under the following criteria: 19 a) Commercial uses shall be limited to: 20 • Low intensity commercial uses that are compatible with both residential and 21 intermediate commercial uses, in order to provide for small scale shopping and 22 personal needs, and 23 • Intermediate commercial to provide for a wider variety of goods and services in 24 areas that have a higher degree of automobile traffic. These uses shall be similar 25 to C-1, C-2, or C-3 zoning districts outlined in the Collier County Land Development 26 Code (Ordinance 91-102), adopted October 30, 1991. 27 b) Rezones shall be encouraged in the form of a Planned Unit Development (there shall 28 be no minimum acreage requirement for PUD rezones except for the requirement that 29 all requests for rezoning must be at least forty thousand (40,000) square feet in area 30 unless the proposed rezone is an extension of an existing zoning district consistent 31 with the Golden Gate Area Master Plan). 32 c) Projects within this Subdistrict shall make provisions for shared parking arrangements 33 with adjoining commercial developments when appropriate. 34 d) Driveways and curb cuts for projects within this Subdistrict shall be consolidated with 35 adjoining commercial developments. 36 e) Access to projects shall not be permitted from Collier Boulevard. 37 f) Any project located within this Subdistrict at the northwest corner of Golden Gate 38 Parkway and Santa Barbara Boulevard, less and except an easement for Santa 39 Barbara Boulevard right-of-way, shall be subject to the following additional 40 development restrictions: 41 1. The site shall be limited to thirty-five thousand (35,000) square feet of building 42 area. 43 2. Land uses shall be restricted to offices only. 44 45 46 47 48 Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 40 of 64 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 309 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Words underlined are added; words struck-through are deleted. 3. All principal structures shall be required to have a minimum setback of one 1 hundred (100) feet from the project's northern boundary. 2 4. The northern seventy-five (75) feet of the western sixty (60) percent of the site 3 shall be a green area (open space area). It shall be utilized for only water 4 management facilities, landscape buffers, and similar uses. 5 5. The western sixty (60) percent of the site shall have an outdoor pedestrian-6 friendly patio(s), that total at least five hundred (500) square feet in area and 7 incorporate a minimum of: benches or seating areas for at least twelve (12) 8 persons, and vegetative shading, and a waterfall or water feature of at least 9 one hundred (100) square feet in area, and brick pavers. 10 6. A twenty-five (25) foot wide landscaped strip shall be provided along the entire 11 frontage of both Golden Gate Parkway and Santa Barbara Boulevard. 12 7. A minimum buffer of thirty-five (35) feet in width shall be provided along the 13 project's western boundary and along the eastern forty (40) percent of the 14 project's northern boundary. A minimum buffer of fifty (50) feet in width shall 15 be provided along the western sixty (60) percent of the project's northern 16 boundary. Where feasible, existing native vegetation shall be retained within 17 these buffers along the project's western and northern boundaries. These 18 buffers shall be supplemented with Oak or Mahogany trees planted a maximum 19 of twenty (20) feet apart in a staggered manner; and a seven (7) foot wall, 20 fence, or hedge that will, within two (2) years of planting, grow to a minimum 21 height of seven (7) feet and be a minimum of ninety-five (95) percent opaque. 22 8. All buildings shall have tile or metal roofs, or decorative parapet walls above 23 the roofline, and buildings shall be finished in light subdued colors except for 24 decorative trim. 25 9. Building heights shall be limited to one (1)-story and a maximum of thirty-five 26 (35) feet. 27 10. All lighting facilities shall be architecturally designed, and limited to a height of 28 twenty-five (25) feet. Such lighting facilities shall be shielded from neighboring 29 residential land uses. 30 11. There shall be no ingress or egress on Santa Barbara Boulevard. 31 6. Estates Shopping Center Subdistrict 32 Recognizing the need to provide for centrally located basic goods and services within a portion 33 Northern Golden Gate Estates, the Estates Shopping Center Subdistrict has been designated 34 on the Golden Gate Area Future Land Use Map. 35 The Subdistrict is located at the NW corner of Golden Gate Boulevard and Wilson Boulevard 36 westward to 3rd Street NW and extending northward to include the southern 180 feet of Tracts 37 142 and 106 of Unit 11 and the southern 255 feet of Tract 111 of Unit 11 of Golden Gate 38 Estates, totaling approximately 41 acres. 39 The Estates Shopping Center Subdistrict is intended to provide convenient shopping, 40 personal services and employment for the central areas of Northern Golden Gate Estates. 41 Commercial development in this Subdistrict will reduce driving distances for many residents, 42 assist in minimizing the road network required, and reduce traffic impacts in this area of Collier 43 County. 44 45 46 47 48 Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 41 of 64 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 310 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Words underlined are added; words struck-through are deleted. All development in this Subdistrict shall comply with the following requirements and limitations: 1 a. Allowable Uses shall be limited to the following: 2 1. Amusement and recreation 3 Groups 7911 – Dance studios, schools and halls, excluding discotheques 4 7991 – Physical fitness facilities 5 7999 – Amusement and recreation services, not elsewhere classified, 6 allowing only day camps, gymnastics instruction, judo/karate 7 instruction, sporting goods rental and yoga instruction 8 2. Apparel and accessory stores (no adult oriented sales) 9 Groups 5611 – Men’s and boys’ clothing and accessory stores 10 5621 – Women’s clothing stores 11 5632 – Women’s accessory and specialty stores 12 5641 – Children’s and infants’ wear stores 13 5651 – Family clothing stores 14 5661 – Shoe stores 15 5699 – Miscellaneous apparel and accessory stores 16 3. Automotive dealers and gasoline service stations 17 Groups 5531 – Auto and home supply stores 18 4. Automotive repair, services and parking (No outdoor repair/service. All 19 repairs/services to be performed by authorized automotive technician.) 20 Groups 7514 – Passenger car rental 21 5. Building materials, hardware, garden supply, and mobile home dealers 22 Groups 5231 – Paint, glass, and wallpaper stores 23 5251 – Hardware stores 24 5261 – Retail nurseries, lawn and garden supply stores 25 6. Business services 26 Groups 7334 – Photocopying and duplicating services 27 7335 – Commercial photography 28 7336 – Commercial art and graphic design 29 7338 – Secretarial and court reporting services 30 7342 – Disinfecting and pest control services 31 7352 – Medical equipment rental and leasing 32 7359 – Equipment rental and leasing, not elsewhere classified, 33 excluding the following uses: airplane rental and leasing; coin 34 operated machine rental and leasing; industrial truck rental and 35 leasing; oil field equipment rental and leasing; oil well drilling 36 equipment rental; leasing; toilets, portable – rental and leasing; 37 and vending machines – rental only 38 7371 – Computer programming services 39 7372 – Prepackaged software 40 7373 – Computer integrated systems design 41 7374 – Computer processing and data preparation and processing 42 services 43 44 45 46 Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 42 of 64 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 311 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Words underlined are added; words struck-through are deleted. 7375 – Information retrieval services 1 7376 – Computer facilities management services 2 7379 – Computer related services, not elsewhere classified 3 7382 – Security systems services 4 7383 – News syndicates 5 7384 – Photofinishing laboratories 6 7389 – Business services, not elsewhere classified 7 7. Communications 8 Groups 4812 – Radiotelephone communications 9 4841 – Cable and other pay television services 10 8. Construction, special trade contractors (office use only, no on-site materials or 11 equipment storage) 12 Groups 1711 – Plumbing, heating and air-conditioning 13 1721 – Painting and paper hanging industry 14 1731 – Electrical work industry 15 1741 – Masonry, stone setting, and other stone work 16 1742 – Plastering, drywall, acoustical, and insulation work 17 1743 – Terrazzo, tile, marble, and mosaic work industry 18 1751 – Carpentry work 19 1752 – Floor laying and other floor work, not elsewhere classified 20 industry 21 1761 – Roofing, siding, and sheet metal work industry 22 1771 – Concrete work industry 23 1781 – Water well drilling industry 24 1791 – Structural steel erection 25 1793 – Glass and glazing work 26 1794 – Excavation work 27 1795 – Wrecking and demolition work 28 1796 – Installation or erection of building equipment, not elsewhere 29 1799 – Special trade contractors, not elsewhere classified 30 9. Depository institutions 31 Groups 6021 – National commercial banks 32 6022 – State commercial banks 33 6029 – Commercial banks, not elsewhere classified 34 6035 – Savings institutions, federally chartered 35 6036 – Savings Institutions, not federally chartered 36 6061 – Credit unions, federally chartered 37 6062 – Credit unions, not federally chartered 38 6091 – Non-deposit trust facilities 39 6099 – Functions related to depository banking, not elsewhere 40 classified 41 10. Eating and drinking places (Group 5812, including only liquor service accessory to 42 the restaurant use, no outdoor music or televisions, and no windows or walls open 43 to the outside, except as required by code) 44 45 46 Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 43 of 64 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 312 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Words underlined are added; words struck-through are deleted. 11. Engineering, accounting, research, management, and related services 1 Groups 8711 – Engineering services 2 8712 – Architectural services 3 8713 – Surveying services 4 8721 – Accounting, auditing, and bookkeeping services 5 8741 – Management services 6 8742 – Management consulting services 7 8743 – Public relations services 8 8748 – Business consulting services, not elsewhere classified 9 12. Executive, legislative, and general government, except finance 10 Groups 9111 – Executive offices 11 9121 – Legislative bodies 12 9131 – Executive and legislative offices combined 13 9199 – General government, not elsewhere classified 14 13. Food stores 15 Groups 5411 – Grocery stores (minimum 27,000 square feet) 16 5421 – Meat and fish (seafood) markets, including freezer provisioners 17 5431 – Fruit and vegetable markets 18 5441 – Candy, nut, and confectionery stores 19 5451 – Dairy products stores 20 5461 – Retail bakeries 21 5499 – Miscellaneous food stores, including convenience stores with 22 fuel pumps and carwash 23 14. General merchandise stores 24 Groups 5311 – Department stores 25 5331 – Variety stores 26 5399 – Miscellaneous general merchandise stores 27 15. Home furniture, furnishings, and equipment stores 28 Groups 5712 – Furniture stores 29 5713 – Floor covering stores 30 5714 – Drapery, curtain, and upholstery stores 31 5719 – Miscellaneous home furnishings stores 32 5722 – Household appliance stores 33 5731 – Radio, television, and consumer electronics stores 34 5734 – Computer and computer software stores 35 5735 – Record and prerecorded tape stores (no adult oriented sales) 36 5736 – Musical instrument store 37 16. Insurance carriers 38 Groups 6311 – Life insurance 39 6321 – Accident and health insurance 40 6324 – Hospital and medical service plans 41 6331 – Fire, marine, and casualty insurance 42 43 44 45 Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 44 of 64 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 313 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Words underlined are added; words struck-through are deleted. 6351 – Surety insurance 1 6361 – Title insurance 2 6371 – Pension, health and welfare funds 3 6399 – Insurance carriers, not elsewhere classified 4 6411 – Insurance agents 5 17. Justice, public order and safety 6 Groups 9221 – Police protection 7 9222 – Legal counsel and prosecution 8 9229 – Public order and safety, not elsewhere classified 9 18. Meeting and banquet rooms 10 19. Miscellaneous retail (no adult oriented sales) 11 Groups 5912 – Drug stores and proprietary stores 12 5921 – Liquor stores (accessory to grocery or pharmacy only) 13 5932 – Used merchandise stores 14 5941 – Sporting goods stores and bicycle shops 15 5942 – Book stores 16 5943 – Stationery stores 17 5944 – Jewelry stores, including repair 18 5945 – Hobby, toy, and game shops 19 5946 – Camera and photographic supply stores 20 5947 – Gift, novelty, and souvenir shops 21 5948 – Luggage and leather goods stores 22 5949 – Sewing, needlework, and piece goods stores 23 5992 – Florists 24 5993 – Tobacco stores and stands 25 5994 – News dealers and newsstands 26 5995 – Optical goods stores 27 5999 – Miscellaneous retail stores, not elsewhere classified (excluding 28 gravestone, tombstones, auction rooms, monuments, 29 swimming pools, and sales barns) 30 20. Non-depository credit institutions 31 Groups 6111 – Federal and federally-sponsored credit agencies 32 6141 – Personal credit institutions 33 6153 – Short-term business credit institutions, except agricultural 34 6159 – Miscellaneous business credit institutions 35 6162 – Mortgage bankers and loan correspondents 36 6163 – Loan brokers 37 21. Offices and clinics of dentist (Group 8021) 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 45 of 64 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 314 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Words underlined are added; words struck-through are deleted. 22. Personal services 1 Groups 7212 – Garment pressing, and agents for laundries and drycleaners 2 7221 – Photographic studios, portrait 3 7231 – Beauty shops 4 7241 – Barber shops 5 7251 – Shoe repair shops and shoeshine parlors 6 7291 – Tax return preparation services 7 7299 – Miscellaneous personal services, not elsewhere classified, 8 excluding massage parlors, Turkish baths and escort services 9 23. Public finance, taxation, and monetary policy (Group 9311) 10 11 24. Real Estate 12 Groups 6512 – Operators of nonresidential buildings 13 6513 – Operators of apartment buildings 14 6514 – Operators of dwellings other than apartment buildings 15 6515 – Operators of residential mobile home sites 16 6517 – Lessors of railroad property 17 6519 – Lessors of real property, not elsewhere classified 18 6531 – Real estate agents and managers 19 6541 – Title abstract offices 20 6552 – Land subdividers and developers, except cemeteries 21 25. Schools and educational services, not elsewhere classified (Group 8299) 22 26. Security and commodity brokers, dealers, exchanges, and services 23 Groups 6211 – Security brokers, dealers, and flotation companies 24 6221 – Commodity contracts brokers and dealers 25 6231 – Security and commodity exchanges 26 6282 – Investment advice 27 6289 – Services allied with the exchange of securities or commodities, 28 not elsewhere classified 29 27. Social services 30 Groups 8322 – Individual and family social services (adult day care centers 31 only) 32 8351 – Child day care services 33 28. Travel agencies (Group 4724) 34 29. Veterinary services for animal specialties (Group 0742, excluding outside 35 kenneling) 36 30. Video tape rental (Group 7841, excluding adult oriented sales and rentals) 37 31. United states postal service (Group 4311, excluding major distribution centers) 38 32. Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of 39 permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals (“BZA”) 40 by the process outlined in the LDC. 41 42 43 44 45 46 Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 46 of 64 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 315 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Words underlined are added; words struck-through are deleted. b. Accessory Uses: 1 1. Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal 2 uses and structures, including, but not limited to: 3 a. Utility buildings (including water and wastewater plants) which shall be 4 enclosed 5 b. Essential service facilities 6 c. Gazebos, statuary and other architectural features 7 d. Utilities, water and wastewater facilities and/or plants (all processing plants 8 must be enclosed) 9 e. Alcohol service for outdoor dining shall only be accessory to food service 10 c. Operational Standards 11 1. Outdoor music is prohibited 12 13 d. The following uses shall be prohibited: 14 1. Amusement and recreation services, not elsewhere classified (Group 7999, except 15 those uses expressly listed above in a.1 are permitted) 16 2. Air and water resource and solid waste management (Group 9511) 17 3. Business Services 18 Groups 7313 – Radio, television, and publishers’ advertising representatives 19 7331 – Direct mail advertising services 20 4. Correctional Institutions (Group 9223) 21 5. Drinking places (alcoholic beverages) (Group 5813) 22 6. Educational services 23 Groups 8211 – Elementary and secondary schools 24 8221 – Colleges, universities, and professional schools 25 8222 – Junior colleges and technical institutes 26 8231 – Libraries 27 7. Health services 28 Groups 8062 – General medical and surgical hospitals 29 8063 – Psychiatric hospitals 30 8069 – Specialty hospitals, except psychiatric 31 8. Miscellaneous Retail 32 Groups 5921 – Liquor stores 33 5961 – Catalog and mail-order houses 34 5962 – Automatic merchandising machine operators 35 9. Personal services 36 Groups 7211 – Power Laundries, family and commercial 37 7261 – Funeral service and crematories 38 10. Social services 39 Groups 8322 – Individual and family social services, excluding adult day care 40 centers 41 8361 – Residential care, including soup kitchens and homeless 42 shelters 43 44 Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 47 of 64 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 316 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Words underlined are added; words struck-through are deleted. e. Development intensity shall be limited to 190,000 square feet of gross leasable floor 1 area. 2 f. No commercial use shall exceed fifteen thousand (15,000) square feet, except for a 3 single grocery store use between twenty-seven thousand (27,000) and sixty thousand 4 (60,000) square feet in size, a single commercial use of up to thirty thousand (30,000) 5 square feet in size, and a single commercial use of up to twenty thousand (20,000) 6 square feet in size. 7 g. No building may exceed 30,000 square feet in size, except for the grocery anchored 8 building with inline stores. 9 h. Development within this Subdistrict shall be phased and the following commitments 10 related to area roadway improvements shall be completed within the specified 11 timeframes: 12 1. Right-of-Way for Golden Gate Boulevard Expansion and Right-of-Way for the 13 Wilson Boulevard Expansion will be donated to the County at no cost within 120 14 days of a written request from the County. 15 2. The owner will pay its fair share for the intersection improvements at Wilson 16 Boulevard and Golden Gate Boulevard within 90 days of County request for 17 reimbursement. 18 3. Until the intersection improvements at Golden Gate Boulevard and Wilson 19 Boulevard are complete, the County shall not issue a Certificate(s) of Occupancy 20 (CO) for more than 100,000 square feet of development. The applicant must 21 obtain a C.O. for a grocery store as part of this 100,000 square feet, and the 22 grocery store must be the first C.O. obtained. 23 i. Rezoning is encouraged to be in the form of a Planned Unit Development (PUD), and 24 the rezone ordinance must contain development standards to ensure that all 25 commercial land uses will be compatible with neighboring residential uses. 26 This subdistrict includes a conceptual plan, which identifies the location of the 27 permitted development area and required preserve area for this subdistrict. The 28 preserve area depicted on the conceptual plan shall satisfy all comprehensive plan 29 requirements for retained native vegetation, including but not limited to the 30 requirements of Policy 6.1.1 of the CCME. A more detailed development plan must 31 be developed and utilized for the required PUD rezoning. 32 j. Development standards, including permitted uses and setbacks for principal buildings 33 shall be established at the time of PUD rezoning. Any future PUD rezone shall include 34 at a minimum: 35 (1) Landscape buffers adjacent to external rights-of-way shall be: 36 • 1st/3rd Streets ‒ Minimum 30’ wide enhanced buffer 37 • Wilson Boulevard ‒ Minimum 25’ wide enhanced buffer 38 • Golden Gate Boulevard ‒ Minimum 50’ wide enhanced buffer 39 (2) Except for the utility building, no commercial building may be constructed within 40 125 feet of the northern property boundary and within 300’ of the 3rd Street NW 41 boundary of this subdistrict. 42 43 44 45 46 Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 48 of 64 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 317 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Words underlined are added; words struck-through are deleted. (3) Any portion of the Project directly abutting residential property (property zoned E-1 Estates and without an approved conditional use) shall provide, at a minimum, a 2 seventy-five (75) feet wide buffer, except the westernmost 330’ of Tract 106, which 3 shall provide a minimum 20’ wide buffer in which no parking uses are 4 permitted. Twenty-five (25) feet of the width of the buffer along the developed area 5 shall be a landscape buffer. A minimum of fifty (50) feet of the buffer width shall 6 consist of retained or re-planted native vegetation and must be consistent with 7 subsection 3.05.07.H of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC). The 8 native vegetation retention area may consist of a perimeter berm and be used for 9 water management detention. Any newly constructed berm shall be revegetated 10 to meet subsection 3.05.07.H of the LDC (native vegetation replanting 11 requirements). Additionally, in order to be considered for approval, use of the 12 native vegetation retention area for water management purposes shall meet the 13 following criteria: 14 a. There shall be no adverse impacts to the native vegetation being retained. The 15 additional water directed to this area shall not increase the annual hydro-period 16 unless it is proven that such would have no adverse impact to the existing 17 vegetation. 18 b. If the project requires permitting by the South Florida Water Management 19 District, the project shall provide a letter or official document from the District 20 indicating that the native vegetation within the retention area will not have to 21 be removed to comply with water management requirements. If the District 22 cannot or will not supply such a letter, then the native vegetation retention area 23 shall not be used for water management. 24 c. If the project is reviewed by Collier County, the developer’s engineer shall 25 provide evidence that no removal of native vegetation is necessary to facilitate 26 the necessary storage of water in the water management area. 27 28 7. Southbrooke Office Subdistrict 29 The Southbrooke Office Subdistrict is approximately five (5) acres and is located approximately 30 1/4 mile east of Oakes Boulevard on the south side of Immokalee Road. he intent of the 31 subdistrict is to permit general office, medical office, and business service uses generally 32 consistent with those uses permissible by right, or as a conditional use in the C-1 Commercial 33 Professional and General Office zoning district. 34 35 Development within the Subdistrict is encouraged to be rezoned as a PUD in order to provide 36 greater specificity of permitted land uses, development standards and any necessary operational 37 characteristics. A maximum of 40,000 square feet of commercial development shall be permitted. 38 All buildings will be limited to single-story, and shall be constructed in a common architectural 39 theme. A minimum 30 feet in width vegetated buffer shall be provided adjacent to Autumn Oaks 40 Lane, which shall consist of retained native vegetation. Access to the Subdistrict shall only be 41 from Immokalee Road. 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 49 of 64 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 318 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Words underlined are added; words struck-through are deleted. 1 3. AGRICULTURAL/RURAL DESIGNATION 2 Rural Settlement Area District 3 This area consists of Sections 13, 14, 23 and 24, and a portion of 22, Township 48 South, Range 4 27 East (the former North Golden Gate Subdivision), which was zoned and platted between 1967 5 and 1970. In settlement of a lawsuit pertaining to the permitted uses of this property, this property 6 has been “vested” for the types of land uses specified in that certain “PUD” by Settlement Zoning 7 granted by the County as referenced in that certain SETTLEMENT AND ZONING AGREEMENT 8 dated the 27th day of January, 1986. Twenty-one hundred (2,100) dwelling units and twenty-two 9 (22) acres of neighborhood commercial uses and hotel/motel use are “vested”. This area is now 10 comprised of the Orange Tree PUD and Orange Blossom Ranch PUD, and the types of uses 11 permitted in this District include residential, earth mining, commercial, agricultural, community 12 facility, community uses, education facilities, religious facilities, golf course, open space and 13 recreational uses, and essential service uses. 14 By designation in the Growth Management Plan and the Golden Gate Area Master Plan as 15 Settlement Area, the Plan recognizes the property as an area which, while outside of the Urban 16 Designation, is appropriate for the following types of uses: residential, earth mining, commercial, 17 agricultural, community facility, community uses, education facilities, religious facilities, golf 18 course, open space and recreational, and essential services. 19 Future zoning changes to add dwelling units or commercial acreage within the geographic 20 boundaries of this District will not be prohibited or discouraged by reason of the above-referenced 21 vested status. The geographic expansion of the Settlement Area to additional lands outside the 22 areas covered by Sections 13, 14, 23 and 24, and a portion of 22, Township 48 South, Range 27 23 East (the former North Golden Gate Subdivision), shall be prohibited. The Settlement Area Land 24 Use District is limited to the area described above and shall not be available as a land use district 25 for any other property in the County. 26 4. OVERLAYS AND SPECIAL FEATURES 27 Southern Golden Gate Estates Natural Resource Protection Overlay 28 Southern Golden Gate Estates is identified as a Natural Resource Protection Area (NRPA) 29 Overlay on the Golden Gate Area Future Land Use Map and is subject to the NRPA Overlay 30 provisions of the FLUE. 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 50 of 64 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 319 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Words underlined are added; words struck-through are deleted. FUTURE LAND USE MAP SERIES Golden Gate Area Master Plan Study Areas Golden Gate Area Future Land Use Map High Density Residential Subdistrict 1989 Boundaries of Activity Center Downtown Center Commercial Subdistrict Urban Mixed Use Activity Center/Golden Gate Parkway and Coronado Parkway Golden Gate Urban Commercial Infill Subdistrict and Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict Santa Barbara Commercial Subdistrict Golden Gate Parkway Professional Office Commercial Subdistrict Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict Pine Ridge Road Interchange Activity Center and Pine Ridge Road Mixed Use Subdistrict Golden Gate Estates Neighborhood Centers Wilson Boulevard/Golden Gate Boulevard Center Collier Boulevard/Pine Ridge Road Center Golden Gate Boulevard/Everglades Boulevard Center Immokalee Road/Everglades Boulevard Center Randall Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict Commercial Western Estates Infill Subdistrict Golden Gate Parkway Interchange Conditional Uses Area Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict Mission Subdistrict Estates Shopping Center Subdistrict Estates Shopping Center Subdistrict Conceptual Plan Everglades – Randall Subdistrict Southbrooke Office Subdistrict Conditional Uses Subdistrict: Golden Gate Parkway Special Provisions Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 51 of 64 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 320 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 52 of 64 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 321 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 53 of 64 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 322 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 54 of 64 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 323 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 55 of 64 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 324 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element i Words underlined are added; words stuck through are deleted. EXHIBIT “A” COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN ELEMENT Prepared by Collier County Zoning Division Prepared for COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Adopted (date) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 56 of 64 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 325 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element ii Words underlined are added; words stuck through are deleted. AMENDMENTS TO COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN – prior to 2019 GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN DATE AMENDED ORDINANCE NO. * Indicates adopted portions ** Ordinance No. 2000-25 rescinded and repealed in its entirety Collier County Ordinance No. 99-63, which had the effect of rescinding certain EAR-based (1996 EAR) objectives and policies at issue in Administration Commission Case No. ACC-99-02 (DOAH Case No. 98-0324GM). *** Ordinance No. 2000-26 amended Ordinance No. 89-05, as amended, the Collier County Growth Management Plan, having the effect of rescinding certain EAR-based (1996 EAR) objectives and policies at issue in Administration Commission Case No. ACC-99-02 (DOAH Case No. 98-0324GM), more specifically portions of the Intergovernmental Coordination Element (Ord. No. 98-56), Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge (Ord. No. 97-59) and Drainage (Ord. No. 97-61) sub-elements of the Public Facilities Element, Housing Element (Ord. No. 97-63), Golden Gate Area Master Plan (Ord. No. 97-64), Conservation and Coastal Management Element (Ord. No. 97-66), and the Future Land May 9, 2000 2000-25 ** May 9, 2000 2000-26 *** May 9, 2000 2000-27 May 9, 2000 2000-28 May 9, 2000 2000-29 March 13, 2001 2001-12 May 14, 2002 2002-24 September 10, 2003 2003-44 December 16, 2003 2003-67 October 26, 2004 2004-71 June 7, 2005 2005-25 January 25, 2007 2007-19 December 4, 2007 2007-76 December 4, 2007 2007-77 December 4, 2007 2007-83 October 14, 2008 2008-55 October 14, 2008 2008-56 October 14, 2008 2008-59 July 28, 2010 2010-31 July 28, 2010 2010-32 September 14, 2011 2011-29 January 9, 2013 2013-15 November 18, 2014 2014-41 November 10, 2015 2015-62 May 10, 2016 2016-12 June 13, 2017 2017-23 Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 57 of 64 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 326 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element iii Words underlined are added; words stuck through are deleted. Use Element and Future Land Use Map (Ord. No. 97-67); and readopting Policy 2.2.3 of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan. • The above Ordinance No. 2007-19 is based on the 2004 Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR). • The above Ordinance No. 2013-15 is based on the 2011 Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR). AMENDMENTS TO COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN – prior to 2000 GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN DATE AMENDED ORDINANCE NO. May 19, 1992 92-34 August 4, 1992 92-50 May 25, 1993 93-24 April 12, 1994 94-22 March 14, 1995 95-12 April 14, 1998 98-26 September 8, 1998 98-70 February 23, 1999 99-17 Note: All of the above amendments occurred after adoption of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan in 1991 (Ord. No. 91-15) and prior to adoption of amendments on ___, 2019 Due to the restructuring of this Element in 2019 to create three Sub-Elements, these amendments are no longer denoted on the pages of the Element with Roman numeral symbols that provide informational citations to adopted documents recorded in the Official Records of Collier County. Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 58 of 64 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 327 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element iv Words underlined are added; words stuck through are deleted. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. INTRODUCTION 1 II. OVERVIEW 2 A. County-Wide Planning Process B. Golden Gate Area Planning Process III. MAPS 4 Original Golden Gate Area Master Plan Study Areas Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 59 of 64 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 328 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element 1 Words underlined are added; words stuck through are deleted. I. INTRODUCTION As part of the revised Growth Management Plan, the County adopted the original Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) in 1991. The GGAMP was further revised in 1997. The Golden Gate Area Master Plan provides growth management regulations for the designated Golden Gate Area (see Original Golden Gate Area Master Plan Study Areas Map). The Golden Gate Area was previously subject to the regulations outlined in the County's Future Land Use Element (FLUE). However, in 1991, the unique characteristics of the area resulted in adoption of a Master Plan for Golden Gate, as a separate Element of the Collier County Growth Management Plan. This Master Plan superseded former Objective 1, Policy 1.1, and Policy 1.3 of the FLUE. All other Goals, Objectives, and Policies contained in the FLUE and all other Elements of the Growth Management Plan remain applicable to the Golden Gate Area. In addition, the Golden Gate Area Future Land Use Map will be used instead of the County-Wide Future Land Use Map. In April 1996, the Board of County Commissioners adopted the Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) for Collier County. As a result of the recommendations made in the EAR, Ordinance 91- 15, which adopted the original Golden Gate Area Master Plan, was repealed and a new Ordinance 97-64 was adopted. In February of 2001, the Board of County Commissioners directed staff to initiate a restudy of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan. Accordingly, in June of 2001, Comprehensive Planning Section Staff requested that the Board appoint an advisory committee, consisting of residents of Golden Gate City and Golden Gate Estates, to aid Staff in the restudy process. The Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy Committee met on over twenty (20) occasions, between June 2001 and June 2003, to consider proposed amendments to the GGAMP, as well as other matters related to the Golden Gate Area. All meetings were open to the public; many of these meetings were well attended. The restudy process was divided into two phases. The County transmitted Phase I amendments to the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA) in April 2003. These amendments were adopted, as Ordinance 2003-44, in September 2003. Phase II amendments were transmitted in June 2004. The Phase II amendments were adopted in October 2004, as Ordinance 2004-71. In February 2015, the Board of County Commissioners directed staff to initiate another restudy of the GGAMP. Staff evaluated the Golden Gate Area within 3 distinct areas: 1) Golden Gate City, 2) Rural Golden Gate Estates, defined as Golden Gate Estates east of Collier Boulevard; and 3) Urban Golden Gate Estates, defined as Golden Gate Estates west of Collier Boulevard. Guided by an Oversight Committee, staff conducted eight public workshops along with electronic outreach to gather resident and stakeholder opinions. Most fundamentally, the vision statements created by consensus within the sub-areas of the Golden Gate Area are as follows: Golden Gate City Vision Statement: Golden Gate City is a safe, diverse, family-oriented community that offers easy access to education, parks, shopping and services within a vibrant, walkable community. Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 60 of 64 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 329 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element 2 Words underlined are added; words stuck through are deleted. Rural Golden Gate Estates Vision Statement: The Golden Gate Rural Estates is an interconnected, low-density residential community with limited goods and services in neighborhood centers, defined by rural character with appreciation for nature and quiet surroundings. Urban Golden Gate Estates Vision Statement: Golden Gate Urban Estates is a low-density, large-lot residential neighborhood in a natural setting with convenient access to the coastal area. Implementation strategies have been developed to address land use, public facilities, transportation, rural character, emergency management and natural resources. The Goals, Objectives and Policies, Land Use Designation Descriptions and Maps are implemented as separate sub-elements for three distinct areas: 1. Golden Gate City Master Plan Sub-Element; 2. Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element; and 3. Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element. [REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 61 of 64 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 330 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element 3 Words underlined are added; words stuck through are deleted. II. OVERVIEW A. COUNTY-WIDE PLANNING PROCESS Pursuant to Section 163.3177(6), Florida Statutes, the Collier County Growth Management Plan shall contain the following elements: 1. Future Land Use 2. Housing 3. Public Facilities 4. Conservation and Coastal Management (Coastal Counties only) 5. Intergovernmental Coordination 6. Capital Improvements 7. Transportation 8. Recreation and Open Space In addition to the above Elements, local government comprehensive plans in Florida may, by decision of the local legislative body, contain one or more optional elements. Optional elements are required to comply with certain general criteria under Section 163.3177, Florida Statutes, but are not subject to specific requirements (with some exceptions). In 1991, the Board of County Commissioners chose the option of adopting the Golden Gate Area Master Plan, in recognition of the unique characteristics of the Golden Gate Area. In addition to establishing the Collier County Growth Management Plan’s mandatory structure, Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, also subjects the Plan to a mandatory evaluation process every seven (7) years. This process involves the preparation of an Evaluation and Appraisal Review (EAR) to determine whether, and to what extent, the existing Growth Management Plan has carried out its stated Goals, Objectives and Policies. B. GOLDEN GATE AREA PLANNING PROCESS Objective 4 of the Collier County Future Land Use Element (FLUE) allows the countywide planning process to “address specific geographic or issue areas.” Policy 4.1 of this Objective reads as follows: “A detailed Master Plan for Golden Gate Estates has been developed and was incorporated into this Growth Management Plan in February 1991. The Master Plan addresses Natural Resources, Future Land Use, Water Management, Public Facilities and other considerations.” In February 1991, the Board of County Commissioners adopted the original Golden Gate Area Master Plan. The original Master Plan incorporated the recommendations of a Citizens Steering Committee. A revised and updated Master Plan was adopted in 1997, pursuant to recommendations of the County’s 1996 Evaluation and Appraisal Report. In 2001, the Board of County Commissioners established the Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy Committee and directed Staff to work with the Committee to further revise and update the Master Plan. The Board of County Commissioners adopted revisions to the GGAMP, incorporating the recommendations of the Restudy Committee, in 2003 and 2004. Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 62 of 64 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 331 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element 4 Words underlined are added; words stuck through are deleted. III. Maps Original Golden Gate Area Master Plan Study Areas Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 63 of 64 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 332 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 64 of 64 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 333 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 334 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 335 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 336 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Golden Gate City Sub-Element i Words underlined are added; words stuck through are deleted. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN 8 9 GOLDEN GATE CITY SUB-ELEMENT 10 11 12 Prepared by 13 Collier County Zoning Division 14 15 Prepared for 16 COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 17 Adopted (date) 18 19 20 21 22 Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 1 of 22 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 337 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Golden Gate City Sub-Element ii Words underlined are added; words stuck through are deleted. 1 AMENDMENTS TO COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN 2 GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN: GOLDEN GATE CITY SUB-ELEMENT 3 4 DATE AMENDED ORDINANCE NO. 5 6 7 8 9 (date), 2019 2019-(#) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 2 of 22 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 338 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Golden Gate City Sub-Element iii Words underlined are added; words stuck through are deleted. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 Page 3 4 A. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES 1 5 6 B. LAND USE DESIGNATION DESCRIPTION SECTION 6 7 1. URBAN DESIGNATION 6 8 A. Urban ‒ Mixed Use District 6 9 1. Urban Residential Subdistrict 10 2. High Density Residential Subdistrict 11 3. Downtown Center Commercial Subdistrict 12 B. Urban ‒ Commercial District 9 13 1. Mixed Use Activity Center Subdistrict 14 2. Golden Gate Urban Commercial Infill Subdistrict 15 3. Santa Barbara Commercial Subdistrict 16 4. Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict 17 18 C. LIST OF MAPS 12 19 Golden Gate City Future Land Use Map 20 High Density Residential Subdistrict 1989 Boundaries of Activity Centers 21 Downtown Center Commercial Subdistrict 22 Urban Mixed Use Activity Centers Golden Gate Parkway and Coronado Parkway 23 Golden Gate Urban Commercial Infill Subdistrict and Golden Gate Estates 24 Commercial Infill Subdistrict 25 Santa Barbara Commercial Subdistrict 26 Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict 27 Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 3 of 22 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 339 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Golden Gate City Sub-Element 1 Words underlined are added; words stuck through are deleted. A. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES GOAL 1: TO GUIDE LAND USE AND PUBLIC FACILITY DECISION MAKING AND TO BALANCE THE NEED TO PROVIDE BASIC SERVICES WITH NATURAL RESOURCE CONCERNS THROUGH A WELL PLANNED MIX OF COMPATIBLE LAND USES WHICH ENSURE THE HEALTH, SAFETY, WELFARE, AND QUALITY OF LIFE OF THE LOCAL RESIDENTS. OBJECTIVE 1.1: Develop new or revised uses of land consistent with designations outlined on the Golden Gate City Future Land Use Map and provisions found in the Land Use Designation Description Section of this Sub-Element. Policy 1.1.1: The Policies under the above Objective shall identify the Future Land Use Designations, Districts, and Subdistricts for Golden Gate City. Policy 1.1.2: The Land Use Designation Description Section of this Sub-Element shall provide the standards and permitted uses for Golden Gate City Future Land Use Districts and Subdistricts. Policy 1.1.3: The Golden Gate City Future Land Use Map and companion Future Land Use Designations, Districts, and Subdistricts shall be binding on all development orders unless otherwise permitted in this Master Plan effective with the adoption of this Master Plan. Policy 1.1.4: The URBAN Future Land Use Designation shall include Future Land Use Districts and Subdistricts for: A. URBAN ‒ MIXED USE DISTRICT 1. Urban Residential Subdistrict 2. High Density Residential Subdistrict 3. Downtown Center Commercial Subdistrict B. URBAN ‒ COMMERCIAL DISTRICT 1. Mixed Use Activity Center Subdistrict 2. Golden Gate Urban Commercial Infill Subdistrict 3. Santa Barbara Commercial Subdistrict 4. Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict Policy 1.1.5: No development orders shall be issued inconsistent with the Golden Gate City Sub-Element with the exception of those unimproved properties granted a positive determination through the Zoning Re-evaluation Program and identified on the Future Land Use Map Series as properties consistent by Policy and those development orders issued pursuant to conditional uses and rezones approved based on the County-Wide Future Land Use Element (adopted January 10, 1989, Ordinance 89-05) which was in effect at the time of approval. Any subsequent development orders shall also be reviewed for consistency with the Growth Management Plan based on the County-Wide Future Land Use Element. Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 4 of 22 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 340 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Golden Gate City Sub-Element 2 Words underlined are added; words stuck through are deleted. Policy 1.1.6: The sites containing existing public educational plants and ancillary plants, and the undeveloped sites owned by the Collier County School Board for future public educational plants and ancillary plants, within the GGAMP area, are depicted on the Future Land Use Map Series in the countywide FLUE and on the Public School Facilities Element Map Series, and referenced in FLUE Policy 5.14 and Intergovernmental Coordination Element Policy 1.2.6. All of these sites are subject to the general Interlocal Agreement, adopted on May 15, 2003 by the Collier County School Board and on May 27, 2003 by the Board of County Commissioners, and as subsequently amended and restated, with an effective date of December 2008, and subject to the implementing land development regulations to be adopted. OBJECTIVE 1.2: Ensure public facilities are provided at an acceptable level of service. Policy 1.2.1: Requests for new uses of land shall be subject to level of service standards and concurr ency requirements for public facilities as outlined in the Capital Improvement Element of the Growth Management Plan. OBJECTIVE 1.3: Protect and preserve the valuable natural resources within Golden Gate City. Policy 1.3.1: The County shall protect and preserve natural resources within Golden Gate City in accordance with the Objectives and Policies contained within Goals 6 and 7 of the Collier County Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME). Policy 1.3.2: Collier County shall coordinate its planning and permitting activities within Golden Gate City with all other applicable environmental planning, permitting and regulatory agencies to ensure that all Federal, State and local natural resource protection regulations are being enforced. OBJECTIVE 1.4: Provide a living environment within Golden Gate City, which is aesthetically acceptable and protects the quality of life. Policy 1.4.1: Collier County shall provide a living environment that is aesthetically acceptable and protects the quality of life through the enforcement of applicable codes and laws. Policy 1.4.2: The County's Code Enforcement Board shall strictly enforce the Land Development Code and other applicable codes and laws to control the illegal storage of machinery, vehicles and junk, and the illegal operation of commercial activities within Golden Gate City. GOAL 2: TO PRESERVE AND ENHANCE A MIX OF RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL LAND USES WITHIN GOLDEN GATE CITY THAT CREATES A SAFE, DIVERSE AND VIBRANT WALKABLE COMMUNTY CONSISTENT WITH THE STATED VISION OF GOLDEN GATE CITY. Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 5 of 22 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 341 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Golden Gate City Sub-Element 3 Words underlined are added; words stuck through are deleted. OBJECTIVE 2.1: Provide for residential and commercial land uses that meet the needs of Golden Gate City and the surrounding area. Policy 2.1.1: Development and redevelopment within Golden Gate City shall be guided by the residential and commercial needs consistent with the stated vision of Golden Gate City. Policy 2.1.2: The County shall protect established stable neighborhoods and provide opportunity for redevelopment and renewal through development standards and practices that promote compatibility. Policy 2.1.3 Within two years, Collier County shall create development standards to guide the transformatio n of Golden Gate Parkway and the Activity Center into destinations that are convenient, pleasant and safe for pedestrians and cyclists, and maintain strong connections to transit service. Policy 2.1.4 The Activity Center shall allow uses intended to strengthen the economic health of Golden Gate City. Policy 2.1.5 Collier County shall discourage new land uses along Golden Gate Parkway and within the Activity Center that impede pedestrian activity and are solely auto-oriented, such as car washes, storage facilities, auto dealerships and drive throughs. Land development regulations will be established within two years to ensure compatibility of auto-oriented uses within the pedestrian environment. Policy 2.1.6 Residential land use designations shall support the diversity of housing types within Golden Gate City. Policy 2.1.7: Collier County shall respond to community-initiated planning programs as they may occur. Community planning programs may take into consideration the following issues: A. Affordable housing based upon home ownership; B. Commercial re-vitalization, to include: i. Sidewalks ii. Traffic calming measures iii. Improved street lighting; C. Neighborhood parks, open space and recreational centers; D. Crime reduction; E. Consistent enforcement of land development regulations; and, F. Improved lighting for streets and parking areas. OBJECTIVE 2.2: Strengthen the quality of life in Golden Gate City and the surrounding area, and promote a healthy economy through support of redevelopment and renewal in Golden Gate City with focus along Golden Gate Parkway and within the designated Activity Center. Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 6 of 22 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 342 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Golden Gate City Sub-Element 4 Words underlined are added; words stuck through are deleted. Policy 2.2.1 Collier County shall consider the use of redevelopment tools such as tax increment financing. Policy 2.2.2 Within two years of adoption, Collier County shall initiate a community renewal plan to include economic development strategies, urban design schemes, and infrastructure improvements. Renewal plans shall be in concert with the vision of Golden Gate City and promote vibrant urbanism, improve aesthetics and support walkability. Policy 2.2.3 Within two years of adoption, Collier County shall initiate the involvement of Golden Gate City residents and business owners to consider amendments to the Land Development Code to support and implement residential and commercial redevelopment and renewal initiatives. Amendments shall include incentives for remodeling and renovation by creating criteria and standards for variances and/or deviations. Policy 2.2.4 In collaboration with the Golden Gate City residents and business owners, and other community partners such as the Greater Naples Chamber of Commerce, Collier County shall initiate a branding and marketing plan for Golden Gate City within two years of adoption. The proposed plan shall be in concert with the overall vision for Golden Gate City. Policy 2.2.5 Collier County will work to ensure pertinent economic incentive programs are made available to those seeking business creation and redevelopment opportunities. OBJECTIVE 2.3 Ensure Golden Gate City public facilities are provided at an acceptable level of service, planned and implemented in concert with the vision of Golden Gate City. Policy 2.3.1 Due to the continued use of individual septic systems and private wells within a densely platted urban area, Collier County Public Utilities will expand sewer and water service in accordance with the Implementation Report attached as Appendix A to Resolution No. 2017-222. Expansion plans shall consider the renewal areas of Golden Gate Parkway and the area surrounding the Activity Center a priority for expansion and shall coordinate its projects with scheduled road and/or stormwater improvements to maximize efficiency and minimize disruption to businesses and residents. Policy 2.3.2 Collier County will support all transportation needs within Golden Gate City with an emphasis on walkability. Walkability will be improved through the implementation of the recommendations of the Metropolitan Planning Organization’s Walkability Study. Policy 2.3.3 Redevelopment within the Activity Center shall maintain multiple access points to the surrounding neighborhoods and through the Activity Center while providing safe and direct access to transit stops within or adjacent to the Activity Center. Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 7 of 22 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 343 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Golden Gate City Sub-Element 5 Words underlined are added; words stuck through are deleted. Policy 2.3.4 Alleys in Golden Gate City may only be vacated if such vacation does not prevent reasonable connection and continuity for future pedestrian, non-motorized and transit trips. Within one year of adoption, Resolution 2013-166 shall be amended to implement this policy. Policy 2.3.5 To ensure a safe and pleasant pedestrian environment, Collier County shall periodically conduct speed studies in Golden Gate City. When appropriate, traffic calming measures and speed limit reductions may be implemented. [REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 8 of 22 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 344 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Golden Gate City Sub-Element 6 Words underlined are added; words stuck through are deleted. B. LAND USE DESIGNATION DESCRIPTION SECTION The following section describes the three land use designations shown on the Golden Gate City Future Land Use Map. These designations generally indicate the types of land uses for which zoning may be requested. However, these land use designations do not guarantee that a zoning request will be approved. Requests may be denied by the Board of County Commissioners based on criteria in the Land Development Code or in special studies completed for the County. 1. URBAN DESIGNATION: URBAN MIXED-USE DISTRICT AND URBAN COMMERCIAL DISTRICT Urban Designated Areas on the Future Land Use Map include two general portions of Collier County: areas with the greatest residential densities and areas in close proximity, which have or are projected to receive future urban support facilities and services. It is intended that Urban Designated areas accommodate the majority of population growth and that new intensive land uses be located within them. The boundaries of the Urban Designated areas have been established based on several factors including: • patterns of existing development, • patterns of approved but unbuilt development, • natural resources, water management, and hurricane risk, • existing and proposed public facilities, • population projections, and • land needed to accommodate growth. The Urban Designation will also accommodate future non-residential uses including essential services as defined by the most recently adopted Collier County Land Development Code. Other permitted non-residential land uses may include: a. parks, open space and recreational use; b. water-dependent and water-related uses; c. child care centers; d. community facilities such as neighborhood churches, cemeteries, schools, and school facilities co-located with other public facilities such as parks, libraries, and community centers, where feasible and mutually acceptable, fire and police stations; e. utility and communication facilities. f. support medical facilities such as physician's offices, medical clinics, treatment, research and rehabilitative centers and pharmacies (as long as the dominant use is medical related) may also be permitted provided they are granted concurrent with or located within ¼ mile of existing or approved hospitals or medical centers which offer primary and urgent care treatment for all types of injuries and traumas, such as, Golden Gate Urgent Care. Stipulations to ensure that the construction of such support medical facilities is concurrent with hospitals or such medical centers shall be determined at the time of zoning approval. Group Housing shall be permitted within the Urban Mixed-Use District and Urban Commercial Districts subject to the definitions and regulations as outlined in the Collier County Land Development Code (Ordinance No. 04-41, as amended) and consistent with locational requirements in Florida Statutes (Chapter 419.001 F.S.). Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 9 of 22 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 345 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Golden Gate City Sub-Element 7 Words underlined are added; words stuck through are deleted. Group Housing includes the following type facilities: a. Family Care Facility if occupied by not more than six (6) persons shall be permitted in residential areas. b. Group Care Facility, c. Care Units, d. Adult Congregate Living Facilities, and e. Nursing Homes. A. Urban-Mixed Use District This district is intended to accommodate a variety of residential and commercial land uses including single-family, multi-family, duplex, and mixed use (Planned Unit Development). 1. Urban Residential Subdistrict All land within the urban mixed-use designation is zoned and platted. However, any parcel to be rezoned residential is subject to and must be consistent with the Density Rating System. DENSITY RATING SYSTEM: a. BASE DENSITY – Four (4) residential units per gross acre is the eligible density, though not an entitlement. b. DENSITY BONUSES – Density bonuses are discretionary, not entitlements, and are dependent upon meeting the criteria for each bonus provision and compatibility with surrounding properties, as well as the rezone criteria in the Land Development Code. The following densities per gross acre may be added to the base density. In no case shall the maximum permitted density exceed 16 residential dwelling units per gross acre. i. Conversion of Commercial Zoning Bonus • 16 dwelling units – If a project includes the conversion of commercial zoning that has been found to be “Consistent By Policy” through the Collier County Zoning Re- evaluation Program (Ordinance No. 90-23), then a bonus of up to 16 dwelling units per acre may be added for every one (1) acre of commercial zoning that is converted to residential zoning. These dwelling units may be distributed over the entire project. ii. Proximity to Activity Center • 3 dwelling units - Within 1 mile of Activity Center iii. Affordable Housing Bonus To encourage the provision of affordable housing within certain Districts and Subdistricts in the Urban Designated Area, a maximum of up to 12 residential units per gross acre may be added to the base density if the project meets the requirements of the Affordable Housing Density Bonus Ordinance (Section 2.06.00 of the Land Development Code, Ordinance No. 04-41, as amended) and if the affordable housing units are targeted for families earning no greater than 140% of the median income for Collier County. iv. Residential In-fill If the project is 10 acres or less in size; located within an area with central public water and sewer service; compatible with surrounding land uses; has no common site development plan with adjoining property; no common ownership with any adjacent Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 10 of 22 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 346 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Golden Gate City Sub-Element 8 Words underlined are added; words stuck through are deleted. parcels; and the parcel in question was not created to take advantage of the in-fill residential density. • 3 dwelling units v. Roadway Access Density credits based on future roadways will be awarded if the developer commits to construct a portion of the roadway (as determined by the County) or the road is scheduled for completion during the first five years of the Capital Improvement Schedule. • Add 1 dwelling unit - if direct access to two or more arterial or collector roads as identified in the Transportation Element. c. There are Density Bands located around Activity Centers. The density band around an Activity Center shall be measured by the radial distance from the center of the intersection around which the Activity Center is situated. If 50% or more of a project is within the density band, the additional density applies to the entire project. Density bands shall not apply within the Estates Designation. 2. High Density Residential Subdistrict: To encourage higher density residential and promote mixed uses in close proximity to Activity Centers, those residential zoned properties permitting up to 12 dwelling units per acre which were located within and consistent with the Activity Center designation at Golden Gate Parkway and Coronado Parkway established by the 1989 Collier County Growth Management Plan and subsequently removed by the creation of a new Activity Center via the adoption of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan are recognized as being consistent with this Master Plan and are outlined on the High Density Residential Subdistrict Map. 3. Downtown Center Commercial Subdistrict: The primary purpose of the Downtown Center Commercial Subdistrict (see Downtown Center Commercial Subdistrict Map) is to encourage redevelopment along Golden Gate Parkway in order to improve the physical appearance of the area and create a vibrant and viable downtown district within Golden Gate City. Emphasis shall be placed on the creation of a pedestrian-oriented boulevard. The provisions of this Subdistrict are intended to ensure harmonious development of commercial and mixed-use buildings at a pedestrian scale that are compatible with residential development within and outside of the Subdistrict. The Subdistrict allows the aggregation of properties in order to promote flexibility in site design. The types of uses permitted within this Subdistrict are low intensity retail, office, personal services, institutional, and residential. Non-residential development is intended to serve the needs of residents within the Subdistrict, surrounding neighborhoods, and passersby. a. All development or redevelopment within the boundaries of the Downtown Center Commercial Subdistrict shall include: i. Provisions for bicycle and pedestrian travel. ii. An emphasis on building aesthetics. ii. Emphasis on the orderly circulation of vehicular, bicycle and pedestrian traffic. iii. Provision for broad sidewalks. iv. Enhanced streetscaping. Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 11 of 22 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 347 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Golden Gate City Sub-Element 9 Words underlined are added; words stuck through are deleted. v. Project interconnections, where possible and feasible. vi. Quality designs for building façades, including lighting, uniform signage and landscaping. b. Permitted uses within this Subdistrict shall include only the following, except as may be restricted in an implementing zoning overlay district, and except as may be prohibited in Paragraph D, below: i. Those uses permitted by right within the C-1, C-2 and C-3 Zoning Districts, as outlined in the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC); ii. Residential uses permitted by right in the existing residential zoning districts in this Subdistrict; iii. Those permitted uses that may be allowed in an implementing zoning overlay district. c. Conditional uses allowed by this Subdistrict shall include only: i. Those conditional uses allowed within the C-1, C-2 and C-3 Zoning Districts, as outlined in the LDC; ii. Those conditional uses allowed, by the LDC, within existing residential Zoning Districts in this Subdistrict; iii. Those conditional uses that may be allowed in an implementing zoning overlay district; and, d. Prohibited uses in this Subdistrict are as follows: i. Automatic food and drink vending machines located exterior to a building. ii. Any commercial use employing drive-up, drive-in or drive-through delivery of goods or services. iii. Enameling, painting or plating as a primary use. However, these uses are permitted if secondary to an artist’s or craft studio. iv. Single-room occupancy hotels, prisons, detention facilities, halfway houses, soup kitchens or homeless shelters. v. Uses as may be prohibited in an implementing zoning overlay district. B. Urban Commercial District 1. Mixed Use Activity Center Subdistrict The Activity Center designated on the Future Land Use Map is intended to accommodate commercial zoning within the Urban Designated Area. Activity Centers are intended to be mixed-use (commercial, residential, institutional) in character. The Activity Center concept is designed to concentrate new and existing commercial zoning in locations where traffic impacts can readily be accommodated, to avoid strip and disorganized patterns of commercial development, and to create focal points within the community. The size and configuration of the Activity Center is outlined on the Urban Mixed-Use Activity Center – Golden Gate Parkway and Coronado Parkway Map. The standard for intensity of commercial uses allowed within each Activity Center is the full array of uses allowed in the C-1 through C-5 Zoning Districts, as identified in the Land Development Code (Ordinance No. 04-41, as amended) excluding the following new commercial uses: Hotels and motels that locate within an Activity Center will be allowed to develop at a density consistent with the Land Development Code. Residential density for residential projects located within the boundaries of the Mixed-Use Activity Center shall be allowed Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 12 of 22 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 348 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Golden Gate City Sub-Element 10 Words underlined are added; words stuck through are deleted. to develop at a density of up to 22 residential units per gross acre. This density may be distributed throughout the project, including any portion located outside of the boundary of the Mixed-Use Activity Center. Certain uses specifically intended to support economic development in Golden Gate City are allowed within the Mixed Use Activity Center. The following uses, as identified with a number from the Standard Industrial Classification Manual are permissible. a. Advanced manufacturing, including automated apparel (2211-2299, and 2311-2399), light assembly (3679) and 3D printing (3571, 3629); b. Call centers (7338); c. Software development and programming (7371); d. Internet technologies and electronic commerce (7374); e. Data and information processing (7374); f. Professional services that are export based such as laboratory research or testing activities (8734); g. Other uses as may be determined by the Board of County Commissioners consistent with the intent of supporting economic development in Golden Gate City. 2. Golden Gate Urban Commercial In-fill Subdistrict This Subdistrict is located at the southwest quadrant of C.R. 951 and Golden Gate Parkway. Due to the existing zoning and land use pattern in proximity to the Commercial In -fill Subdistrict (see Golden Gate Urban Commercial Infill Subdistrict and Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict Map) and the need to ensure adequate development standards to buffer adjacent land uses, commercial uses shall be permitted under the following criteria: a. Commercial uses shall be limited to: i. Low intensity commercial uses that are compatible with both residential and intermediate commercial uses, in order to provide for small scale shopping and personal needs, and ii. Intermediate commercial to provide for a wider variety of goods and services in areas that have a higher degree of automobile traffic. These uses shall be similar to C-1, C-2, or C-3 zoning districts outlined in the Collier County Land Development Code (Ordinance 91-102), adopted October 30, 1991. b. Rezones shall be encouraged in the form of a Planned Unit Development (there shall be no minimum acreage requirement for PUD rezones except for the requirement that all requests for rezoning must be at least forty thousand (40,000) square feet in area unless the proposed rezone is an extension of an existing zoning district consistent with the Golden Gate Area Master Plan); c. Projects within this Subdistrict shall make provisions for shared parking arrangements with adjoining commercial developments when appropriate; d. Driveways and curb cuts for projects within this Subdistrict shall be consolidated with adjoining commercial developments; and e. Access to projects shall not be permitted from Collier Boulevard. 3. Santa Barbara Commercial Subdistrict The boundaries of the Subdistrict are hereby expanded to include the former Commercial Subdistrict and also to extend approximately one (1) block to the east of the former boundary (see Santa Barbara Commercial Subdistrict Map). The intent of the Santa Barbara Commercial Subdistrict is to provide Golden Gate City with an area that is primarily commercial, with an allowance for certain conditional uses. The types of uses permitted within Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 13 of 22 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 349 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Golden Gate City Sub-Element 11 Words underlined are added; words stuck through are deleted. this Subdistrict are low intensity retail, offices, personal services, and institutional uses, such as neighborhood churches and day care centers. Such development is intended to serve the needs of residents within the Subdistrict and surrounding neighborhoods and persons traveling nearby. Commercial and institutional uses permitted within this Subdistrict are those that: a. Generate/attract relatively low traffic volumes; b. Are appropriately landscaped and buffered to protect nearby residential properties; and c. Are architecturally designed to be compatible with nearby residential areas. 4. Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict The primary purpose of the Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict (see Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict Map) is to encourage redevelopment along Collier Boulevard in order to improve the physical appearance of the area. This Subdistrict is intended to allow a mix of uses, including heavy commercial within those areas presently zoned C-5. This Subdistrict includes properties zoned RMF-12, C-4, and C-5. This Subdistrict will allow commercial development on lands presently zoned residential. Buildings shall be limited to three stories, not to exceed 50 feet, inclusive of under building parking. Within one year of the effective date of this Subdistrict, the Land Development Code shall be amended to establish a zoning overlay containing regulations to implement this Subdistrict. a. All development and redevelopment within this Subdistrict shall include: 1. Provisions for bicycle and pedestrian travel. 2. An emphasis on building aesthetics. 3. Emphasis on the orderly circulation of vehicular, bicycle and pedestrian traffic. 4. Provision for adequate ingress and egress, which may include local street vacation or relocation if alternative access is provided. 5. Provision for broad sidewalks or pathways. 6. Enhanced streetscaping. 7. Shared parking and/or property interconnections, where possible and feasible. 8. Quality designs for building facades, including lighting, uniform signage and landscaping. [REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 14 of 22 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 350 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Golden Gate City Sub-Element 12 Words underlined are added; words stuck through are deleted. C. LIST OF MAPS Golden Gate City Future Land Use Map High Density Residential Subdistrict 1989 Boundaries of Activity Centers Downtown Center Commercial Subdistrict Urban Mixed Use Activity Centers Golden Gate Parkway and Coronado Parkway Golden Gate Urban Commercial Infill Subdistrict and Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict Santa Barbara Commercial Subdistrict Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 15 of 22 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 351 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) INTERSTATE 75COLLIER BLVDDowntown Center Commercial Subdistrict Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Mixed Use Activity Center Subdistrict Downtown Center Commercial Subdistrict Santa Barbara Commercial Subdistrict Golden Gate Urban Commercial Infill Subdistrict GOLDEN GATE PKY SANTA BARBARA BLVDGREEN BLVD PROPOSED GOLDEN GATE CITY FUTURE LAND USE MAP AdditionAddition Addition Legend Category Golden Gate Urban Commercial Infill Subdistrict Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Downtown Center Commercial Subdistrict Santa Barbara Commercial Subdistrict Urban Residential Subdistrict Mixed Use Activity Center Subdistrict Addition ¯ 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 352 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 17 of 22 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 353 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Golden Gate PKWY Collier BLVD44th ST SW23rd AVE SW 55th TER SWTropical WAYSanta Barbara BLVDCoronado PKWY 47th ST SW24th AVE SW Tropicana BLVD55th ST SW47th TER SW31st PL SW46th ST SW50th ST SW48th TER SW31st AVE SW 27th CT SW 25th AVE SW Mystic ALY 52nd ST SW29th PL SWHunter BLVD50th TER SW22nd PL SW 30th AVE SWToucan ALY 24th PL SW 53rd ST SW45th ST SW43rd LN SW44th TER SW41st ST SW30th PL SW 25th CT SW51st ST SW43rd ST SW28th AVE SWSunshine BLVD53 r d T E R S W 27th PL SW26th AVE SW 51st TER SW23rd PL SW 52nd TER SW28th PL SW23rd CT SW 49th LN SW54th LN SW41st TER SW27th AVE SW25th PL SW 26th PL SW48th ST SW54th ST SW49th ST SW46th TER SW22nd AVE SW 42nd ST SW52nd LN SW54th TER SW42nd TER SW29th AVE SW 32nd AVE SW Coral Palms LN Lucerne RD28th CT SW 45th TER SW49th TER SW50th LN SW22nd AVE SW 25th PL SW50th ST SW31st PL SW Toucan ALY28th AVE SW 31st AVE SW 45th ST SW26th AVE SW 28th AVE SW55th TER SW29th PL SW 28th PL SW 28th AVE SW 52 n d T E R S W 25th AVE SW 23rd AVE SW 22nd PL SW 27th PL SW22nd AVE SW 23rd PL SW 26th PL SW54th TER SW54 t h S T S W 22nd PL SW 42nd TER SW27th CT SW 26th PL SW 42nd ST SW31st PL SW 41st ST SW46th ST SW22nd AVE SW 43rd ST SW30th PL SW 42nd ST SW53rd ST SW44th TER SW5 3 r d S T S W 44th ST SW4 7 t h S T SW 31st PL SW 28th PL SW55th ST SW22nd PL SW 23rd AVE SW 41st TER SW44th TER SW25th CT SW 30th AVE SW 28th AVE SW 50th TER SW22nd PL SW 28th AVE SW30th AVE SW 4 5 t h S T SW52nd TER SW50th ST SW23rd CT SW 22nd AVE SW Golden Gate PKWYCollier BLVDSanta Barbara BLVDº0 1,000 2,000500 FeetPREPARED BY: GIS/CAD MAPPING SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT FILE: RLS-18-CMP-01009.mxd DATE: 04/2019 SUBJECTSITE DOWNTOWN CENTER COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA EXHIBIT A PL20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 LEGEND DOWNTOWN CENTER COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT DRAFT ADOPTED - OCTOBER 26, 2004 (Ord. No. 2004-71) AMENDED - JANUARY 25, 2007 (Ord. No. 2007-19) AMENDED - OCTOBER 14, 2008 (Ord. No. 2008-59) ADDITION ADDITION ADDITION 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 354 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Golden Gate PKWY55th TER SW55th ST SW44th ST SW23rd AVE SW Hunter BLVD50th TER SWSu n s e t R D Coronado PKWY 47th ST SW24th AVE SW Tropicana BLVD48th ST SWSunshine BLVD45th ST SW47th TER SW51st ST SW31st PL SW48th TER SW46th TER SW31st AVE SW 25th AVE SW 43rd LN SW51st TER SW52nd ST SW46th ST SW45th TER SW30th AVE SWToucan ALY 24th PL SW 53rd ST SW44th TER SW19th PL SW 50 t h S T S W 27th CT SW 30th PL SW 25th CT SW 28th AVE SW53 r d T E R S W 27th PL SWMystic ALY 19th AVE SW 29th PL SW 19th CT SW23rd PL SW 52nd TER SW49th ST SW28th PL SW23rd CT SW 49th LN SW54th LN SW26th AVE SW 4 9 t h T E R SW 27th AVE SW21st PL SW 25th PL SW 26th PL SW22nd PL SW 20th PL SW 54th ST SW52nd LN SW18th PL SW22nd AVE SW 54th TER SW29th AVE SW 21st AVE SW Coral Palms LN Lucerne RD28th CT SW 18th AVE SW50th LN SW20th AVE SW 43rd TER SW20th CT SW52 n d T E R S W 50th ST SW31st PL SW 52nd TER SW50th ST SW27th PL SW26th PL SW23rd AVE SW 22nd PL SW 25th AVE SW 52nd ST SW44th TER SW28th AVE SW 4 7 t h S T SW 28th PL SW28th AVE SW26th AVE SW 28th PL SW19th PL SW 49th TER SW19th P L S W 21st PL SW 45th ST SW49th ST SW51st ST SW21st PL SW22nd PL SW 4 5 t h S T SW 30th PL SW 21st AVE SW 54th TER SW28th AVE SW21st AVE SW 23rd CT SW 22nd PL SW 22nd AVE SW 19th AVE SW 27th CT SW 51st TER SW5 3 r d S T S W 22nd AVE SW 54 t h S T S W 30th AVE SW 55th TER SW55th ST SW46th ST SW44th ST SW53rd ST SW50th TER SW28th AVE SW 28th AVE SW 20th PL SW 31st PL SW 31st AVE SW 44th TER SW50th ST SW19th CT SW 19th AVE SW 26th PL SWToucan ALY23rd PL SW19th PL SW25th CT SW 25th PL SWGolden Gate PKWYURBAN MIXED USE ACTIVITY CENTER GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY AND CORONADO PARKWAY COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA º0 1,000 2,000500 FeetPREPARED BY: GIS/CAD MAPPING SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT FILE: RLS-18-CMP-01009 ACTIVITY CENTER MAP.mxd DATE: 04/2018 SUBJECTSITE LEGEND ACTIVITY CENTER BOUNDARIES AMENDED - JANUARY 25, 2007 (Ord. No. 2007-19) AMENDED - OCTOBER 14, 2008 (Ord. No. 2008-59) AMENDED - JANUARY 25, 2005 (Ord. No. 2005-3) ADDITION ADDITION Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 19 of 22 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 355 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 20 of 22 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 356 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 21 of 22 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 357 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 22 of 22 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 358 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 359 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 360 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 361 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element i Words underlined are added; words stuck through are deleted. 1 2 3 4 5 6 GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN 7 8 URBAN GOLDEN GATE ESTATES SUB-ELEMENT 9 10 11 Prepared by 12 Collier County Zoning Division 13 14 Prepared for 15 COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 16 Adopted (date) 17 18 19 Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 1 of 34 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 362 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element ii Words underlined are added; words stuck through are deleted. 1 AMENDMENTS TO COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN 2 GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN: URBAN GOLDEN GATE ESTATES SUB-ELEMENT 3 4 DATE AMENDED ORDINANCE NO. 5 6 7 8 9 (date), 2019 2019-(#) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 2 of 34 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 363 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element iii Words underlined are added; words stuck through are deleted. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 Page 3 4 A. Goals, Objectives and Policies 1 5 6 B. Land Use Designation Description Section 9 7 1. ESTATES DESIGNATION 9 8 A. Estates – Mixed Use District 9 9 1. Residential Estates Subdistrict 10 2. Neighborhood Center Subdistrict 11 3. Conditional Uses Subdistrict 12 4. Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict 13 B. Estates – Commercial District 15 14 1. Interchange Activity Center Subdistrict 15 2. Pine Ridge Road Mixed Use Subdistrict 16 3. Commercial Western Estates Infill Subdistrict 17 4. Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict 18 5. Southbrooke Office Subdistrict 19 20 C. List of Maps 20 21 Golden Gate Area Future Land Use Map 22 Golden Gate Urban Commercial Infill Subdistrict and Golden Gate Estates 23 Commercial Infill Subdistrict 24 Pine Ridge Road (CR 896) ‒ Interchange Activity Center and Pine Ridge Road Mixed 25 Use Subdistrict 26 Golden Gate Estates Neighborhood Centers 27 Collier Boulevard/Pine Ridge Road Center 28 Commercial Western Estates Infill Subdistrict 29 Golden Gate Parkway Interchange Conditional Uses Area 30 Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict 31 Southbrooke Office Subdistrict 32 Conditional Uses Subdistrict: Golden Gate Parkway Special Provisions 33 Special Exceptions to Conditional Use in Golden Gate Estates34 Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 3 of 34 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 364 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element 1 Words underlined are added; words stuck through are deleted. A. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES GOAL 1: TO GUIDE LAND USE AND PUBLIC FACILITY DECISION MAKING AND TO BALANCE THE NEED TO PROVIDE BASIC SERVICES WITH NATURAL RESOURCE CONCERNS THROUGH A WELL PLANNED MIX OF COMPATIBLE LAND USES WHICH ENSURE THE HEALTH, SAFETY, WELFARE, AND QUALITY OF LIFE OF THE LOCAL RESIDENTS. OBJECTIVE 1.1: Develop new or revised uses of land consistent with designations outlined on the Golden Gate Estates Future Land Use Map and provisions found in the Land Use Designation Description Section of this Sub Element. Policy 1.1.1: The Policies under the above Objective shall identify the Future Land Use Designations, Districts, and Subdistricts for the Urban Golden Gate Estates. Policy 1.1.2: The Land Use Designation Description Section of this Element shall provide the standards and permitted uses for Urban Golden Gate Estates Future Land Use Districts and Subdistricts. Policy 1.1.3: The Urban Golden Gate Estates Area Future Land Use Map and companion Future Land Use Designations, Districts, and Subdistricts shall be binding on all development orders unless otherwise permitted in this Master Plan effective with the adoption of this Master Plan. Policy 1.1.4: The ESTATES Future Land Use Designation shall include Future Land Use Districts and Subdistricts for: A. ESTATES – MIXED USE DISTRICT 1. Residential Estates Subdistrict 2. Neighborhood Center Subdistrict 3. Conditional Uses Subdistrict 4. Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict B. ESTATES – COMMERCIAL DISTRICT 1. Interchange Activity Center Subdistrict 2. Pine Ridge Road Mixed Use Subdistrict 3. Commercial Western Estates Infill Subdistrict 4. Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict 5. Southbrooke Office Subdistrict Policy 1.1.5: Conditional Use requests within Urban Golden Gate Estates shall adhere to the guidelines outlined in the Conditional Uses Subdistrict. Policy 1.1.6: No development orders shall be issued inconsistent with the Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub- Element with the exception of those unimproved properties granted a positive determination through the Zoning Re-evaluation Program and identified on the Future Land Use Map Series as Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 4 of 34 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 365 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element 2 Words underlined are added; words stuck through are deleted. properties consistent by Policy and those development orders issued pursuant to conditional uses and rezones approved based on the County-Wide Future Land Use Element (adopted January 10, 1989, Ordinance 89-05) which was in effect at the time of approval. Any subsequent development orders shall also be reviewed for consistency with the Growth Management Plan based on the County-Wide Future Land Use Element. Policy 1.1.7: The sites containing existing public educational plants and ancillary plants, and the undeveloped sites owned by the Collier County School Board for future public educational plants and ancillary plants, within the Urban Golden Gate Estates area, are depicted on the Future Land Use Map Series in the countywide FLUE and on the Public School Facilities Element Map Series, and referenced in FLUE Policy 5.14 and Intergovernmental Coordination Element Policy 1.2.6. All of these sites are subject to the general Interlocal Agreement, adopted on May 15, 2003 by the Collier County School Board and on May 27, 2003 by the Board of County Commissioners, and as subsequently amended and restated, with an effective date of December 2008, and subject to the implementing land development regulations to be adopted. OBJECTIVE 1.2: Ensure public facilities are provided at an acceptable level of service. Policy 1.2.1: Requests for new uses of land shall be subject to level of service standards and concurrency requirements for public facilities as outlined in the Capital Improvement Element of the Growth Management Plan. OBJECTIVE 1.3: Protect and preserve the valuable natural resources within the Urban Golden Gate Estates. Policy 1.3.1: The County shall protect and preserve natural resources within the Urban Golden Gate Estates in accordance with the Objectives and Policies contained within Goals 6 and 7 of the Collier County Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME). Policy 1.3.2: As provided for in CCME Policy 6.1.1, the subdivision of tracts up to 13 acres in size and designated Residential Estates Subdistrict shall not trigger preserve requirements. Policy 1.3.3: Collier County shall coordinate its planning and permitting activities within the Urban Golden Gate Estates with all other applicable environmental planning, permitting and regulatory agencies to ensure that all Federal, State and local natural resource protection regulations are being enforced. OBJECTIVE 1.4: Provide a living environment within the Urban Golden Gate Estates, which is aesthetically acceptable and protects the quality of life. Policy 1.4.1: Collier County shall provide a living environment that is aesthetically acceptable and protects the quality of life through the enforcement of applicable codes and laws. Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 5 of 34 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 366 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element 3 Words underlined are added; words stuck through are deleted. Policy 1.4.2: The County's Code Enforcement Board shall strictly enforce the Land Development Code and other applicable codes and laws to control the illegal storage of machinery, vehicles and junk, and the illegal operation of commercial activities within the Urban Golden Gate Estates. GOAL 2: TO PROVIDE FOR LIMITED COMMERCIAL SERVICES AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR PURPOSES OF SERVING THE RURAL NEEDS OF GOLDEN GATE ESTATES RESIDENTS, SHORTENING VEHICULAR TRIPS, AND PRESERVING RURAL CHARACTER. OBJECTIVE 2.1: Meet the locational and rural design criteria contained within the Estates Designation, Estates- Mixed Use District, Neighborhood Center Subdistrict and Conditional Use Subdistrict of this Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element, of the Collier County Growth Management Plan when considering the placement and designation of Neighborhood Centers and Conditional Uses within Urban Golden Gate Estates. Policy 2.1.1: Neighborhood Centers within Urban Golden Gate Estates shall be subject to the locational and rural design criteria established within the Estates Designation, Estates – Mixed Use District, Neighborhood Center Subdistrict of this Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element, of the Collier County Growth Management Plan. Policy 2.1.2: Conditional Uses within Urban Golden Gate Estates shall be subject to locational and dimensional criteria established within the Conditional Use Subdistrict in the Land Use Designation Description section of this Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element. GOAL 3: TO PRESERVE THE AREA’S RURAL CHARACTER, AS DEFINED BY LARGE WOODED LOTS, THE KEEPING OF LIVESTOCK, THE ABILITY TO GROW CROPS, WILDLIFE ACTIVITY, ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP, LOW-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, AND LIMITATIONS ON COMMERCIAL AND CONDITIONAL USES. OBJECTIVE 3.1: Balance the provision of public infrastructure with the need to preserve the rural character of Urban Golden Gate Estates. Policy 3.1.1: Future road and bridge improvements in the Urban Golden Gate Estates shall not only provide for safety and reasonable mobility, but shall also contribute to the rural character of the area. Transportation improvements shall be designed in context with their setting. Policy 3.1.2 The County shall initiate architectural standard requirements in the Land Development Code within two years of adoption that apply to commercial, conditional use and essential services facilities, reflecting the rural character of the Estates area and providing coherence and are a identity. Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 6 of 34 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 367 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element 4 Words underlined are added; words stuck through are deleted. Policy 3.1.3: The County Manager or designee shall create a public network of greenway corridors within Urban Golden Gate Estates that interconnects public lands and permanently protected green space. The greenway network shall consist of interconnected trails and paths that allow people to move about the Estates area by means other than motorized vehicles. All greenways shall be constructed within existing or future public easements or rights-of-way. In creating the greenway network, the County shall not employ eminent domain proceedings. Policy 3.1.4: Recognizing the residential nature of the land uses surrounding the I-75 interchange at Golden Gate Parkway, as well as the restrictions on conditional uses of the Conditional Uses Subdistrict of the Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element, there shall be no further commercial zoning for properties abutting Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. No new commercial uses shall be permitted on properties abutting streets accessing Golden Gate Parkway within the above-defined segment. This policy shall not apply to that existing portion of the Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict, which is located at the northwest corner of the intersection of Golden Gate Parkway and Santa Barbara Boulevard. OBJECTIVE 3.2: Provide for the protection of the rural character of Urban Golden Gate Estates. Policy 3.2.1: Rural character protection provisions shall provide for the preservation of such rural amenities as, but not limited to, wooded lots, the keeping of livestock, the ability to grow crops, wildlife activity, and low-density residential development. Policy 3.2.2: The growing of food crops and/or the keeping of livestock on properties within Urban Golden Gate Estates shall be permitted, provided that such activities are conducted according to the Land Development Code. Policy 3.2.3: Rural character shall be further protected by resisting site-specific Master Plan changes that are out of scale or character with the rural quality of Urban Golden Gate Estates. Policy 3.2.4: Recognizing the low density in Urban Golden Gate Estates, the County will initiate a review of written notification requirements in the Land Development Code and the Administrative Code related to land use petitions in Golden Gate Estates, within 1 year of adoption, and consider increasing the specified distance, with particular attention to properties located on dead-end streets. Policy 3.2.5: Consistent with public safety requirements and best practices for rural areas, outdoor lighting within Urban Golden Gate Estates shall be placed, constructed and maintained in such manner as to prevent or reduce light pollution. In implementing this Policy, the County shall: a. Adhere to the “Collier County Lighting Standards” (County Manager’s Office Standards dated January 6, 2017) as amended, with respect to new and existing County owned or maintained sites and structures. b. Continue to coordinate with FPL and FDOT to improve roadway and security lighting consistent with International Dark Skies Association best practices. Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 7 of 34 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 368 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element 5 Words underlined are added; words stuck through are deleted. c. Consider changes to the Land Development Code and other applicable ordinances to create voluntary or mandatory outdoor lighting standards for commercial, residential or other uses consistent with International Dark Skies Association best practices, and determine the extent such standards apply to new or existing development. OBJECTIVE 3.3: Encourage the preservation of natural resources in Urban Golden Gate Estates, including protection and enhancement of its watershed. Policy 3.3.1: The Land Development Code shall continue to allow and further encourage the preservation of native vegetation and wildlife indigenous to the Urban Golden Gate Estates. Policy 3.3.2: The County shall continue to pursue the Watershed Management Plan initiatives in Urban Golden Gate Estates as financial and staff resources become available. Policy 3.3.3: The County shall encourage the combination of parcels smaller than 2.25 acres with other parcels in order to preserve and enhance low-density environmental advantages. Within two years of adoption of this policy, County staff will present recommendations f or property owner incentives to the Board of County Commissioners. Policy 3.3.4: The County will evaluate the use of transferable development rights for the purpose of securing the preservation of wetland or other environmentally significant land within Urban Golden Gate Estates, in a timeframe directed by the Board. Policy 3.3.5: Within two years of adoption, the County, in coordination with the Floodplain Management Committee, will initiate a study on the feasibility of dispersed water management (DWM) for single family Estates lots, and determine the extent to which it will rely on voluntary, incentive or mandatory provisions and whether provisions will apply to developed and undeveloped Estates parcels. Policy 3.3.6: The County will continue to identify and implement educational opportunities related to water resources for parcel owners, homeowners, builders, real estate professionals and the public to aid in understanding and addressing site-specific financial and environmental impacts as well as area-wide impacts to water resources. Policy 3.3.7: The County will periodically coordinate with the South Florida Water Management District to review the Level of Service Standards for primary water management canals within the County and their effect on Urban Golden Gate Estates. Policy 3.3.8: The County shall continue to pursue a best management practices approach to making septage treatment available to residents and businesses within Urban Golden Gate Estates, as a component of bio-solid processing, either directly, through a private entity, or through a public - private partnership. Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 8 of 34 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 369 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element 6 Words underlined are added; words stuck through are deleted. GOAL 4: TO PROVIDE FOR A SAFE AND EFFICIENT COUNTY AND LOCAL ROADWAY NETWORK, WHILE AT THE SAME TIME SEEKING TO PRESERVE THE RURAL CHARACTER OF URBAN GOLDEN GATE ESTATES IN FUTURE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE GOLDEN GATE AREA. OBJECTIVE 4.1: Increase linkages within the local road system for the purposes of limiting traffic on arterials and major collectors within Urban Golden Gate Estates, shortening vehicular trips, and increasing overall road system capacity. Policy 4.2.1: The County shall continue to explore alternative financing methods to facilitate both east - west and north-south bridging of canals within Urban Golden Gate Estates. Policy 4.2.2: The County shall update the 2008 Bridge Study to prioritize bridge construction based on emergency response times, evacuation times, cost components, anticipated development patterns and other considerations and shall report its recommendations to the Board of County Commissioners within two years of adoption of this policy. Policy 4.2.3: Planning and right-of-way acquisition for bridges within the Urban Golden Gate Estates local road system shall include consideration of the costs and benefits of including sidewalks and bike lanes. Policy 4.2.4: Sidewalks and bike lanes shall provide access to government facilities, schools, commercial areas and the planned Metropolitan Planning Organization greenway network. Policy 4.2.5: Planning, funding and implementation of potential greenway trails shall be coordinated between the County and the Metropolitan Planning Organization. GOAL 5: TO PROTECT THE LIVES AND PROPERTY OF THE RESIDENTS OF THE URBAN GOLDEN GATE ESTATES, AS WELL AS THE HEALTH OF THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT, THROUGH THE PROVISION OF EMERGENCY SERVICES THAT PREPARE FOR, MITIGATE, AND RESPOND TO, NATURAL AND MANMADE DISASTERS. OBJECTIVE 5.1: Coordinate with local emergency services officials in engineering and constructing road improvements within Urban Golden Gate Estates to ensure that the access needs of fire department, police and emergency management personnel and vehicles are met. Policy 5.1.1: Collier County shall hold at least one annual public meeting with Urban Golden Gate Estates emergency services providers and the local civic association in order to ensure that emergency needs are addressed during the acquisition of right-of-way for design and construction of road improvements. Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 9 of 34 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 370 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element 7 Words underlined are added; words stuck through are deleted. Policy 5.1.2: Collier County shall continue to coordinate with Golden Gate Area emergency services providers to prioritize necessary road improvements related to emergency evacuation needs. OBJECTIVE 5.2: Ensure that the needs of all applicable emergency services providers are included and coordinated in the overall public project design for capital improvement projects within the Urban Golden Gate Estates. Policy 5.2.1: Preparation of Collier County’s annual Schedule of Capital Improvements for projects within the Urban Golden Gate Estates shall be coordinated with the independent Fire Districts that serve Golden Gate Estates (Fire Districts), public and private utilities, Emergency Medical Services Department and the Collier County Sheriff’s Department to ensure that public project designs are consistent with the needs of these agencies. Policy 5.2.2: Fire Districts, Collier County Emergency Medical Services Department and the Collier County Sheriff’s Department will receive copies of pre-construction plans for capital improvement projects in the Urban Golden Gate Estates and will be invited to review and comment on plans for the public projects. OBJECTIVE 5.3: Maintain and implement public information programs through the Collier County Bureau of Emergency Services, Collier County Sheriff’s Department, Fire Districts, and other appropriate agencies, to inform residents and visitors of the Urban Golden Gate Estates regarding the means to prevent, prepare for, and cope with, man-made and natural disasters. Policy 5.3.1: The Fire Districts that serve the Golden Gate area, and other appropriate agencies, shall embark on an education program to assist residents in knowing and understanding the value and need for prescribed burning on public lands in high risk fire areas. Policy 5.3.2: The Fire Districts and Collier County Bureau of Emergency Services shall actively promote the Firewise Communities Program through public education in Urban Golden Gate Estates. Policy 5.3.3 Fire Districts and the Collier County Bureau of Emergency Services shall hold one or more annual “open house” presentations in the Golden Gate area emphasizing issues related to wildfires, flooding, emergency access and general emergency management. OBJECTIVE 5.4: Pursue appropriate planning and mitigation measures to address the threat of wildfires in Urban Golden Gate Estates. Policy 5.4.1: Collier County shall evaluate the Land Development Code for Urban Golden Gate Estates requirements that are found to be inconsistent with acceptable fire prevention standards. This evaluation process shall be coordinated with the Fire Districts and the Collier County Bureau of Emergency Services. Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 10 of 34 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 371 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element 8 Words underlined are added; words stuck through are deleted. Policy 5.4.2: The County shall explore annually, options for funding wildfire prevention measures undertaken by the County, Florida Forest Service and/or Fire Districts, including but not limited to Urban Golden Gate Estates Municipal Services Taxing Units (MSTU) revenue, grant funding and general fund revenue. Policy 5.4.3: The County shall review annually and update as necessary, all interlocal agreements and mutual aid agreements to assure coordination of legal, procedural and educational components of wildfire prevention. Policy 5.4.4: County-owned property within Urban Golden Gate Estates shall be subject to an active, on-going management plan to reduce the damage caused by wildfires originating from County-owned properties. [REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 11 of 34 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 372 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element 9 Words underlined are added; words stuck through are deleted. B. LAND USE DESIGNATION DESCRIPTION SECTION The following section describes the three land use designations shown on the Urban Golden Gate Estates Future Land Use Map. These designations generally indicate the types of land uses for which zoning may be requested. However, these land use designations do not guarantee that a zoning request will be approved. Requests may be denied by the Board of County Commissioners based on criteria in the Land Development Code or in special studies completed for the County. 1. ESTATES DESIGNATION This designation is characterized by low density semi-rural residential lots with limited opportunities for other land uses. Typical lots are 2.25 acres in size. However, there are some legal non-conforming lots as small as 1.14 acres. Residential density is limited to a maximum of one unit per 2.25 gross acres, or one unit per legal non-conforming lot of record, exclusive of guesthouses. Multiple family dwelling units, duplexes, and other structures containing two or more principal dwellings, are prohibited in all Districts and Subdistricts in this Designation. Generally, the Estates Designation also accommodates future non-residential uses, including: a. Conditional uses and essential services as defined in the Land Development Code, except as prohibited in the Neighborhood Center Subdistrict. Also, refer to the Conditional Uses Subdistrict. b. Parks, open space and recreational uses. c. Group Housing shall be permitted subject to the definitions and regulations as outlined in the Collier County Land Development Code (Ordinance No. 04-41, as amended) and consistent with locational requirements in Florida Statutes (Chapter 419.001 F.S.). d. Schools and school facilities in the Estates Designation north of I-75, and where feasible and mutually acceptable, co-locate schools with other public facilities, such as parks, libraries and community centers to the extent possible. Group Housing includes the following type facilities: aa. Family Care Facility if occupied by not more than six (6) persons shall be permitted in residential areas. bb. Group Care Facility, cc. Care Units, dd. Adult Congregate Living Facilities, and ee. Nursing Homes. All of the above uses shall be consistent with all of the Goals, Objectives and Policies of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan. A. Estates ‒ Mixed-Use District 1. Residential Estates Subdistrict Single-family residential development is allowed within this Subdistrict at a maximum density of one unit per 2.25 gross acres, or one unit per legal non-conforming lot of record, exclusive of guesthouses. 2. Neighborhood Center Subdistrict Recognizing the need to provide basic goods, services and amenities to Estates residents, one Neighborhood Center has been designated on the Urban Golden Gate Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 12 of 34 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 373 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element 10 Words underlined are added; words stuck through are deleted. Estates Future Land Use Map. The Neighborhood Center designation does not guarantee that commercial zoning will be granted. The designation only provides the opportunity to request commercial zoning. a. The Collier County Land Development Code shall be amended to provide rural design criteria to regulate all new commercial development within Neighborhood Centers. b. Locations Neighborhood Centers are located along major roadways and are distributed within Golden Gate Estates according to commercial demand estimates. (See Golden Gate Estates Neighborhood Centers Map). The centers are designed to concentrate all new commercial zoning, and conditional uses, as allowed in the Estates Zoning District, in locations where traffic impacts can be readily accommodated and to avoid strip and disorganized patterns of commercial and conditional use development. One Neighborhood Center is established as follows: i. Collier Boulevard and Pine Ridge Road Center. The center at Collier Boulevard and Pine Ridge Road is located on both sides of the intersection. Tracts 109-114, Unit 26, Golden Gate Estates are included in this center as eligible for commercial development. (See Collier Boulevard/Pine Ridge Road Center Map). The E1/2 of Tract 107, Unit 26 is also included within this center but is only to be used for buffer, water management and open space. c. Criteria for land uses at the center is as follows: i. Commercial uses shall be limited to intermediate commercial so as to provide for a wider variety of goods and services in areas that have a higher degree of automobile traffic. These uses shall be similar to C-1, C-2, or C- 3 zoning districts outlined in the Collier County Land Development Code (Ordinance No. 04-41, as amended), except as prohibited below. ii. The Neighborhood Center located at the intersection of Pine Ridge Road and Collier Boulevard may be developed at 100% commercial and must provide internal circulation. Any rezoning is encouraged to be in the form of a PUD. This Neighborhood Center may also be utilized for single-family residential or conditional uses allowed in the Estates zoning district such as neighborhood churches, social or fraternal organizations, childcare centers, schools, and group care facilities. iv. A single project shall utilize no more than 50% of the total allowed commercial acreage. This percentage may be increased at the discretion of the Board of County Commissioners. v. The project shall make provisions for shared parking arrangements with adjoining developments. vi. Access points shall be limited to one per 180 feet commencing from the right-of-way of the major intersecting streets of the Neighborhood Center. A maximum of three curb cuts per quadrant shall be allowed. vii. Driveways and curb cuts shall be consolidated with adjoining developments, whenever possible. viii. Driveways accessing parcels on opposite sides of the roadway shall be in direct alignment, except when the roadway median between the two parcels has no opening. Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 13 of 34 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 374 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element 11 Words underlined are added; words stuck through are deleted. ix. Projects shall provide a 25-foot wide landscape buffer abutting the external right-of-way. This buffer shall contain two staggered rows of trees that shall be spaced no more than 30 feet on center, and a double row hedge at least 24 inches in height at time of planting and attaining a minimum of three feet height within one year. A minimum of 50% of the 25-foot wide buffer area shall be comprised of a meandering bed of shrubs and ground covers other than grass. Existing native trees must be retained within this 25-foot wide buffer area to aid in achieving this buffer requirement; other existing native vegetation shall be retained, where possible, to aid in achieving this buffer requirement. Water retention/detention areas shall be allowed in this buffer area if left in natural state, and drainage conveyance through the buffer area shall be allowed if necessary to reach an external outfall. a. For Tract 114, Golden Gate Estates, Unit 26, access shall be restricted to 11th Avenue S.W. Also, vehicular interconnection shall be provided to the adjacent property(s) in the Pine Ridge Road/Collier Boulevard Neighborhood Center. b. All buildings shall have tile roofs, ‘Old Style Florida’ metal roofs, or decorative parapet walls above the roofline. The buildings shall be finished in light, subdued colors, except for decorative trim. x. All lighting facilities shall be architecturally–designed, and shall be limited to a height of twenty-five (25) feet. Such lighting facilities shall be shielded from neighboring residential land uses and consistent with Policy 5.2.4. xi. Commercial uses shall encourage pedestrian traffic through placement of sidewalks, pedestrian walkways, and marked crosswalks within parking areas. Adjacent projects shall coordinate placement of sidewalks so that a continuous pathway through the Neighborhood Center is created. xii. All buildings and projects within any single specific quadrant of the Subdistrict shall utilize a common architectural theme. This theme shall be applicable to both building design and signage. xiii. Fences or walls may be constructed on the commercial side of the required landscape buffer between adjacent commercial and residential uses. If constructed, such fences or walls shall not exceed five (5) feet in height. Walls shall be constructed of brick or stone. Fences shall be of wood or concrete post or rail types, and shall be of open design (not covered by slats, boards or wire). xiv. Projects directly abutting residential property (property zoned E-Estates and without an approved conditional use) shall provide, at a minimum, a seventy-five (75) feet wide buffer in which no parking uses are permitted. Twenty-five (25) feet of the width of the buffer along the developed area shall be a landscape buffer. A minimum of fifty (50) feet of the buffer width shall consist of retained native vegetation and must be consistent with subsection 3.05.07H. of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC). The native vegetation retention area may consist of a perimeter berm and be used for water management detention. Any newly constructed berm shall be revegetated to meet subsection 3.05.07H. of the LDC (native vegetation replanting requirements). Additionally, in order to be considered for approval, use of the native vegetation retention area for water management purposes shall meet the following criteria: Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 14 of 34 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 375 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element 12 Words underlined are added; words stuck through are deleted. a. There shall be no adverse impacts to the native vegetation being retained. The additional water directed to this area shall not increase the annual hydro-period unless it is proven that such would have no adverse impact to the existing vegetation. b. If the project requires permitting by the South Florida Water Management District, the project shall provide a letter or official document from the District indicating that the native vegetation within the retention area will not have to be removed to comply with water management requirements. If the District cannot or will not supply such a letter, then the native vegetation retention area shall not be used for water management. c. If the project is reviewed by Collier County, the County engineer shall provide evidence that no removal of native vegetation is necessary to facilitate the necessary storage of water in the water management area. xix. Projects within the Neighborhood Center Subdistrict that are submitted as PUDs shall provide a functional public open-space component. Such public open-space shall be developed as green space within a pedestrian-accessible courtyard, as per Section 4.06.03B. of the Collier County Land Development Code, as in effect at the time of P.U.D. approval. xx. The following principal permitted uses are prohibited within Neighborhood Centers: a. Drinking Places (5813) and Liquor Stores (5921) b. Mail Order Houses (5961) c. Merchandizing Machine Operators (5962) d. Power Laundries (7211) e. Crematories (7261) (Does not include non-crematory Funeral Parlors) f. Radio, TV Representatives (7313) and Direct Mail Advertising Services (7331) g. NEC Recreational Shooting Ranges, Waterslides, etc. (7999) h. General Hospitals (8062), Psychiatric Hospitals (8063), and Specialty Hospitals (8069) i. Elementary and Secondary Schools (8211), Colleges (8221), Junior Colleges (8222) j. Libraries (8231) k. Correctional Institutions (9223) l. Waste Management (9511) m. Homeless Shelters and Soup Kitchens. 3. Conditional Uses Subdistrict Various types of conditional uses are permitted in the Estates zoning district within the Urban Golden Gate Estates area. In order to control the location and spacing of new conditional uses, one of the following four sets of criteria shall be met: a. Essential Services Conditional Use Provisions: Those Essential Services Conditional Uses, as identified within Section 2.01.03 G. of the Collier County Land Development Code, may be allowed anywhere within the Estates Zoning District, except as prohibited in certain Neighborhood Centers, and are described as: Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 15 of 34 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 376 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element 13 Words underlined are added; words stuck through are deleted. 1. electric or gas generating plants, 2. effluent tanks, 3. major re-pump stations, 4. sewage treatment plants, including percolation ponds, 5. hospitals and hospices, 6. water aeration or treatment plants, 7. governmental facilities (except for those Permitted Uses identified in Section 2.01.03 of the Land Development Code), 8. public water supply acquisition, withdrawal, or extraction facilities, and 9. public safety service facilities, and other similar facilities. b. Golden Gate Parkway and Collier Boulevard Special Provisions: 1. Recognizing the existing residential nature of the land uses surrounding the I-75 interchange at Golden Gate Parkway, there shall be no further conditional uses for properties abutting Golden Gate Parkway, between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard, except: as permitted within the Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict and the Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict; as provided in subparagraphs 3. and 5. below; for the properties identified as Unit 30 Tracts 113-115 and the N 150’ of tract 116 that have existing Conditional Uses; and, for essential services, as described in paragraph a., above. 2. Further, no properties abutting streets accessing Golden Gate Parkway, between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard, shall be approved for conditional uses except: as permitted within the Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict; as provided in subparagraph 3. below; and, for essential services, as described in paragraph a. above. 3. In consideration of the improvements associated with the interchange at Interstate 75 and Golden Gate Parkway, the existing conditional use (church and related facilities) located at the southeast corner of Golden Gate Parkway and 66th Street S.W. may be expanded in acreage and intensity along the south side of Golden Gate Parkway to the east of 66th Street S.W., but the total project area shall not exceed approximately 9.22 acres (see Golden Gate Parkway Interchange Conditional Uses Area Map). 4. The parcel located immediately south of the Commercial Western Est ates Infill Subdistrict, on the west side of Collier Boulevard, and at the southwest quadrant of the intersection of Vanderbilt Beach Road and Collier Boulevard, shall be eligible for a transitional conditional use designation. 5. Conditional use for expansion of the existing educational and charitable social organization (Naples Bridge Center) is allowed on the east 150 feet of Tract 75 and the west 150 feet of Tract 82, Unit 30, Golden Gate Estates. The maximum building area permitted on the two parcels shall be limited to 15,000 square feet. Use of Tract 82 shall be limited to parking, water management and open space uses. See Conditional Uses Subdistrict Golden Gate Parkway Special Provisions map. 6. The property located on Collier Boulevard identified as Golden Gate Estates Unit 1, north 150 feet of TR 114, less right-of-way, shall be eligible for Conditional Use. c. Neighborhood Center Transitional Conditional Use Provisions: Conditional uses shall be allowed immediately adjacent to designated Neighborhood Centers subject to the following criteria: Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 16 of 34 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 377 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element 14 Words underlined are added; words stuck through are deleted. 1. Properties eligible for conditional uses shall abut the arterial or collector road serving the Neighborhood Center, 2. Such uses shall be limited to transitional conditional uses that are compatible with both residential and commercial such as neighborhood churches, social or fraternal organizations, childcare centers, schools, and group care facilities, 3. All conditional uses shall make provisions for shared parking arrangements with adjoining developments whenever possible, 4. Conditional uses abutting Estates zoned property shall provide, at a minimum, a 75-foot buffer of native vegetation in which no parking or water management uses are permitted, 5. Conditional uses adjoining the commercial uses within Neighborhood Centers shall, whenever possible, share parking areas, access and curb cuts with the adjoining commercial use, in order to facilitate traffic movement. d. Transitional Conditional Uses: Conditional uses may be granted in Transitional Areas. A Transitional Area is defined as an area located between existing non-residential and residential areas. The purpose of this provision is to allow conditional uses in areas that are adjacent to existing non-residential uses and are therefore generally not appropriate for residential use. The conditional use will act as a buffer between non-residential and residential areas. The following criteria shall apply for Transitional Conditional Use requests: 1. Site shall be directly adjacent to a non-residential use (zoned or developed); 2. Site shall be 2.25 acres, or more, in size or be at least 150 feet in width and shall not exceed 5 acres; 3. Site abutting Estates zoned property without an approved conditional use shall provide, at a minimum, a 75-foot buffer of native vegetation in which no parking or water management uses are permitted; 4. Site shall not be adjacent to a church, neighborhood church or other place of worship, school, social or fraternal organization, child care center, convalescent home, hospice, rest home, home for the aged, adult foster home, children's home, rehabilitation centers; 5. Site shall not be adjacent to parks or open space and recreational uses; and 6. Site shall not be adjacent to permitted (by right) Essential Service uses, as identified in Section 2.01.03 of the Land Development Code, except may be located adjacent to libraries and museums. e. Special Exceptions to Conditional Use Locational Criteria: 1. Temporary use (TU) permits for model homes, as defined in the Collier County Land Development Code, may be allowed anywhere within the Estates-Mixed Use District. Conditional use permits for the purpose of extending the time period for use of the structure as a model home shall be required, and shall be subject to the provisions of Section 5.04.04B. and C. of the Collier County Land Development Code, Ordinance No. 04- 41, as amended. Such conditional uses shall not be subject to the locational criteria of the Conditional Uses Subdistrict, and may be allowed anywhere within the Estates-Mixed Use District. Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 17 of 34 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 378 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element 15 Words underlined are added; words stuck through are deleted. 2. Conditional Use permits for excavation, as provided for in the Estates zoning district, are not subject to the locational criteria for Conditional Uses and may be allowed anywhere within the Estates-Mixed Use District. 3. Conditional Use for a church or place of worship, as provided for in the Estates zoning district, is allowed on Tract 22, Golden Gate Estates, Unit 97 (See Special Exception to Conditional Use Location Criteria Map). 4. Conditional Use for a church or place of worship as allowed in the Estates Zoning District is allowed on the north 180 feet of Tract 107, Unit 30, Golden Gate Estates. Church-related day care use shall not be allowed. Development shall be limited to a maximum of 12,000 square feet of floor area (See Special Exception to Conditional Use Location Criteria Map). 5. Conditional Use for a cellular tower is be allowed in the Estates Zoning District only on parcels no smaller than 2.25 acres and adjacent to a roadway classified within the Transportation Element as a Collector or Arterial. 4. Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict This Subdistrict is specific to Tracts 43, 50, 59, and 66 of Golden Gate Estates Unit 30, and includes four parcels of land containing approximately 16.3 acres, located on the north side of Golden Gate Parkway, east of I-75 and west of Santa Barbara Boulevard. The intent of the Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict is to provide for the continued operation of existing uses, and the development and redevelopment of institutional and related uses. The Subdistrict is intended to be compatible with the neighboring residential uses and will utilize well-planned access points to ensure safe and convenient access onto Golden Gate Parkway. The following institutional uses are permitted through the conditional use process within the Subdistrict: a. Neighborhood churches and other places of worship. b. Group care facilities (Categories I and II) c. Nursing homes and assisted living facilities associated with the David Lawrence Center. d. Essential services as set forth in Section 2.01.03 of the Collier County Land Development Code, Ordinance No. 04-41, as amended. e. Private schools associated with the David Lawrence Center or Parkway Community Church of God, for Tracts 43, 50 and 59 only. f. Day care centers associated with the David Lawrence Center or Parkway Community Church of God. g. Medical offices associated with the David Lawrence Center. B. Estates – Commercial District 1. Interchange Activity Center Subdistrict On the fringes of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan boundaries, there are several parcels that are located within the Interchange Activity Center #10 at I-75 and Pine Ridge Road as detailed in the County-wide Future Land Use Element (FLUE). Parcels within this Activity Center are subject to the County-wide FLUE and not this Master Plan. See Activity Center and Pine Ridge Road Mixed Use Subdistrict Map for a detailed map of this Activity Center. Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 18 of 34 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 379 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element 16 Words underlined are added; words stuck through are deleted. 2. Pine Ridge Road Mixed Use Subdistrict This Subdistrict is adjacent to the northwest quadrant of Interchange Activity Center #10, west of the Naples Gateway PUD, and comprises 16.23 acres. It consists of Tracts 1, 12, 13 and 28 of Golden Gate Estates, Unit 35, as recorded in Plat Book 7, Page 85, of the Public Records of Collier County. The intent of the Pine Ridge Road Mixed Use Subdistrict is to allow for a mix of both retail and office uses to provide for shopping and personal services for the surrounding residential areas within a convenient travel distance and to provide commercial services appropriately located along a collector roadway, Livingston Road. Well-planned access points will be used to improve current and future traffic flows in the area. Within this Subdistrict no more than 35,000 square feet of office-related uses on +3.2 acres are permitted within the eastern portion of this property, which includes a portion of Tract 28 and a portion of Tract 13. A maximum of 80,000 square feet of gross leasable retail or office area, as allowed in the Commercial Intermediate District (C-3) of the Collier County Land Development Code in effect as of the effective date of the adoption of this Subdistrict [Ordinance No. 03-01, adopted January 16, 2003], are permitted within the western 10.52 acres of this property. The C-3 uses are not an entitlement. Such uses will be further evaluated at the time of rezoning application to insure appropriateness in relationship to surrounding properties. A rezoning of the western 10.52 acres is encouraged to be in the form of a Planned Unit Development. Regulations for water management, uniform landscaping, signage, screening and buffering will be included in the rezoning ordinance to ensure compatibility with nearby residential areas, and shall be subject to the following additional criteria: a. There shall be no access onto Livingston Woods Lane. b. Shared access shall be encouraged. c. Building heights shall not exceed 35 feet. d. There shall be a minimum setback area of 75 feet along the northern property line. e. Driveway access, parking, and water management facilities may be allowed within the 75-foot setback area along the northern property line, but none of these uses shall be located closer than 30 feet to this line. f. No freestanding automobile parking lots, homeless shelters or soup kitchens shall be permitted. g. Within the eastern portion of Tract 28, 2.2 acres, more or less, shall be preserved as wetlands and no development shall occur within that area. h. Within the western 10.52 acres, a loop road shall be constructed through the property to provide access from Pine Ridge Road to Livingston Road and to reduce traffic at the intersection. See Activity Center and Pine Ridge Road Mixed Use Subdistrict Map for a detailed map of this Subdistrict. 3. Commercial Western Estates Infill Subdistrict The purpose of the Subdistrict is to allow for limited commercial and/or medical office uses, in recognition of the subject property's unsuitability for single -family residential development. Limited commercial and/or medical uses at this location will also assist in reducing the distance and the number of vehicular trips generated within the general area through trip capture. The standards contained in this Subdistrict are designed to Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 19 of 34 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 380 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element 17 Words underlined are added; words stuck through are deleted. ensure that uses within the Subdistrict will be compatible with nearby residential development. A loop road shall be required through the property to connect Vanderbilt Beach Road with Collier Boulevard will also serve to lessen vehicular trips through the intersection. a. Size and Location: The Subdistrict includes a 6.23-acre parcel, located at the southwest corner of Vanderbilt Beach Road and Collier Boulevard (see Commercial Western Estates Infill Subdistrict Map). The parcel is identified as Tract 105, Unit 2, Golden Gate Estates. b. Permitted Uses and Development Intensity: Within the subject property, 3.93 acres of office/medical use is permitted with a maximum of forty-one thousand four hundred and ninety (41,490) square feet of gross leaseable area permitted or approximately 6,660 square feet per gross acre. The balance of the area, comprising +2.3 acres, shall remain in open space. Uses allowed within this Subdistrict shall be those office uses, medical uses, and financial institutions permitted whether by right or by conditional use, within the C-1 zoning district, as contained in the Collier County Land Development Code, Ordinance 91-102, as of the effective date of the adoption of this Subdistrict [Ordinance No. 03-01, adopted January 16, 2003]. c. Development Standards: 1. All permitted uses within this Subdistrict shall be encouraged to be submitted in the form of a Planned Unit Development (P.U.D.) for the subject property with special attention to be provided for shared access, water management, uniform landscaping, signage, screening and buffering to ensure compatibility with nearby residential areas. 2. Building height shall be limited to two stories, with a maximum height of thirty (30) feet, except that portions of the property within one hundred (100) feet of the buffer described in item #3, below, shall be limited to one story with a maximum height of twenty-five (25) feet. 3. There shall be a setback of seventy-five (75) feet in width abutting Estates- zoned property. Where feasible, existing native vegetation shall be retained within this setback area. Water retention/detention areas shall be allowed in this setback area provided that the area is left in a natural state, and drainage conveyance through the setback area shall be allowed, as necessary, in order for stormwater to reach an external outfall. 4. The buffer area along Collier Boulevard/CR-951 and Vanderbilt Beach Road shall be 25 feet in width and shall conform to the vegetative requirements of a Type "B" buffer as provided for in the Collier County Land Development Code, in effect as of the date of adoption of this amendment [Ordinance No. 03-01, adopted January 16, 2003]. A loop road shall be constructed, internal to the subject property. This road shall be open to the public, in order to connect Vanderbilt Beach Road and Collier Boulevard, so as to provide an alternative to use of the intersection. 5. The maximum gross leaseable floor area of each individual office/medical/financial building footprint shall be 6,000 square feet. However, buildings may be connected by architectural treatments, and shall be designed to appear similar to residential structures through the treatment of rooflines and other architectural embellishments. Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 20 of 34 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 381 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element 18 Words underlined are added; words stuck through are deleted. 6. No development of property within the Subdistrict shall commence until the abutting segment of Collier Boulevard is four-laned. 4. Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict This Subdistrict consists of two infill areas. The two areas are located at the northwest corner of Collier Boulevard and Green Boulevard and at the northwest corner of Santa Barbara Boulevard and Golden Gate Parkway. Due to the existing zoning and land use pattern in proximity to the Estates Commercial In-fill Subdistrict (see Golden Gate Urban Commercial Infill Subdistrict and Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict Map) and the need to ensure adequate development standards to buffer adjacent land uses, commercial uses shall be permitted under the following criteria: a. Commercial uses shall be limited to: 1. Low intensity commercial uses that are compatible with both residential and intermediate commercial uses, in order to provide for small scale shopping and personal needs, and 2. Intermediate commercial to provide for a wider variety of goods and services in areas that have a higher degree of automobile traffic. These uses shall be similar to C-1, C-2, or C-3 zoning districts outlined in the Collier County Land Development Code (Ordinance 91-102), adopted October 30, 1991. b. Rezones shall be encouraged in the form of a Planned Unit Development (there shall be no minimum acreage requirement for PUD rezones except for the requirement that all requests for rezoning must be at least forty thousand (40,000) square feet in area unless the proposed rezone is an extension of an existing zoning district consistent with the Golden Gate Area Master Plan). c. Projects within this Subdistrict shall make provisions for shared parking arrangements with adjoining commercial developments when appropriate. d. Driveways and curb cuts for projects within this Subdistrict shall be consolidated with adjoining commercial developments. e. Access to projects shall not be permitted from Collier Boulevard. f. Any project located within this Subdistrict at the northwest corner of Golden Gate Parkway and Santa Barbara Boulevard, less and except an easement for Santa Barbara Boulevard right-of-way, shall be subject to the following additional development restrictions: 1. The site shall be limited to thirty-five thousand (35,000) square feet of building area. 2. Land uses shall be restricted to offices only. 3. All principal structures shall be required to have a minimum setback of one hundred (100) feet from the project's northern boundary. 4. The northern seventy-five (75) feet of the western sixty (60) percent of the site shall be a green area (open space area). It shall be utilized for only water management facilities, landscape buffers, and similar uses. 5. The western sixty (60) percent of the site shall have an outdoor pedestrian- friendly patio(s), that total at least five hundred (500) square feet in area and incorporate a minimum of: benches or seating areas for at least twelve (12) persons, and vegetative shading, and a waterfall or water feature of at least one hundred (100) square feet in area, and brick pavers. 6. A twenty-five (25) foot wide landscaped strip shall be provided along the entire frontage of both Golden Gate Parkway and Santa Barbara Boulevard. 7. A minimum buffer of thirty-five (35) feet in width shall be provided along the project's western boundary and along the eastern forty (40) percent of the Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 21 of 34 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 382 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element 19 Words underlined are added; words stuck through are deleted. project's northern boundary. A minimum buffer of fifty (50) feet in width shall be provided along the western sixty (60) percent of the project's northern boundary. Where feasible, existing native vegetation shall be retained within these buffers along the project's western and northern boundaries. These buffers shall be supplemented with Oak or Mahogany trees planted a maximum of twenty (20) feet apart in a staggered manner; and a seven (7) foot wall, fence, or hedge that will, within two (2) years of planting, grow to a minimum height of seven (7) feet and be a minimum of ninety-five (95) percent opaque. 8. All buildings shall have tile or metal roofs, or decorative parapet walls above the roofline, and buildings shall be finished in light subdued colors except for decorative trim. 9. Building heights shall be limited to one (1)-story and a maximum of thirty-five (35) feet. 10. All lighting facilities shall be architecturally designed, and limited to a height of twenty-five (25) feet. Such lighting facilities shall be shielded from neighboring residential land uses. 11. There shall be no ingress or egress on Santa Barbara Boulevard. 5. Southbrooke Office Subdistrict The Southbrooke Office Subdistrict is approximately five (5) acres and is located approximately 1/4 mile east of Oakes Boulevard on the south side of Immokalee Road. he intent of the subdistrict is to permit general office, medical office, and business service uses generally consistent with those uses permissible by right, or as a conditional use in the C-1 Commercial Professional and General Office zoning district. Development within the Subdistrict is encouraged to be rezoned as a PUD in order to provide greater specificity of permitted land uses, development standards and any necessary operational characteristics. A maximum of 40,000 square feet of commercial development shall be permitted. All buildings will be limited to single - story, and shall be constructed in a common architectural theme. A minimum 30 feet in width vegetated buffer shall be provided adjacent to Autumn Oaks Lane, which shall consist of retained native vegetation. Access to the Subdistrict shall only be from Immokalee Road. [REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 22 of 34 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 383 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element 20 Words underlined are added; words stuck through are deleted. C. LIST OF MAPS Golden Gate Area Future Land Use Map Golden Gate Urban Commercial Infill Subdistrict and Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict Pine Ridge Road (CR 896) ‒ Interchange Activity Center and Pine Ridge Road Mixed Use Subdistrict Golden Gate Estates Neighborhood Centers Collier Boulevard/Pine Ridge Road Center Commercial Western Estates Infill Subdistrict Golden Gate Parkway Interchange Conditional Uses Area Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict Southbrooke Office Subdistrict Conditional Uses Subdistrict: Golden Gate Parkway Special Provisions Special Exceptions to Conditional Use in Golden Gate Estates Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 23 of 34 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 384 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) COLLIER BLVDCOLLIER BLVDT A M I A M I T R L E INTERSTATE 75 INTERSTATE 75I-75I-75RANDALL BLVD C.R. 951IMMOKALEE RD C.R. 951S.R. 84 EVERGLADES BLVD SDESOTO BLVD SIMMOKALEE RD OIL WELL RD COLLIER BLVDLIVINGSTON RDDAVIS BLVD PINE RIDGE RD EVERGLADES BLVD NRADIO RD G.G. PKWY DESOTO BLVD SLOGAN BLVD NSANTA BARBARA BLVDDESOTO BLVD NVANDERBILT BEACH RD GOLDEN GATE BLVD EVERGLADES BLVD SGOLDEN GATE BLVD GREEN BLVD RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK RD WILSON BLVD COUNTY BARN RDURBAN DESIGNATION THIS MAP CAN NOT BE INTERPRETED WITHOUT THE GOALS, OBJECTIVES, POLICIES AND LAND USE DESIGNATION DESCRIPTION SECTION OF THE GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN. NOTE : MIXED USE DISTRICT Urban Residential Subdistrict Downtown Center Commercial Subdistrict ESTATES DESIGNATION MIXED USE DISTRICT Residential Estates Subdistrict Conditional Uses Subdistrict T 51 ST 50 ST 49 ST 48 ST 47 S R 26 E R 27 E R 28 E R 29 E GOLDEN GATEFUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDED - JANUARY 25, 2005 (ORD. NO. 2005-3) AMENDED - DECEMBER 4, 2007 (ORD. NO. 2007-77) AMENDED - OCTOBER 14, 2008 (ORD. NO. 2008-59) AMENDED - JULY 28, 2010 (ORD. NO. 2010-31) AMENDED - JULY 28, 2010 (ORD. NO. 2010-32) AMENDED - NOVEMBER 18, 2014 (ORD. NO. 2014-41) AMENDED - SEPTEMBER 14, 2011 (ORD. NO. 2011-29) AMENDED - NOVEMBER 10, 2015 (ORD. NO. 2015-62) ADOPTED -FEBRARY, 1991 AMENDED - MAY 19, 1992 AMENDED - MAY 25, 1993 AMENDED - JULY 27, 1993 AMENDED - APRIL 12, 1994 AMENDED - MARCH 14, 1995 AMENDED - OCTOBER 27, 1997 AMENDED - APRIL 14, 1998 AMENDED - SEPTEMBER 8, 1998 AMENDED - FEBRUARY 23, 1999 AMENDED - MAY 9, 2000 AMENDED - MARCH 13, 2001 AMENDED - MAY 14, 2002 AMENDED - SEPTEMBER 10, 2003 (ORD. NO. 2003-44) AMENDED - OCTOBER 26, 2004 (ORD. NO. 2004-71) AMENDED - JANUARY 25, 2007 (ORD. NO. 2007-19) AMENDED - JUNE 13,2017 (ORD. NO. 2017-23) GOLDEN GATE AREAFUTURE LAND USE MAP 0 1 2 30.5 Miles PREPARED BY: GIS/MAPPING SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPT. DATE: 05/2018 FILE: PL20180000261-CPSP-2018-2 GGFLU DRAFT.MXD ° SUBJECT SITE (ADDITIONS)CPSP-2018-2 DRAFT AMENDED - XXXXX (ORD. NO. XXXX) AMENDED - MAY 10, 2016 (ORD. NO. 2016-12) High Density Residential Subdistrict Mixed Use Activity Center Subdistrict Golden Gate Urban Commercial Infill Subdistrict Santa Barbara Commercial Subdistrict COMMERCIAL DISTRICT Conditional Use Subdistrict: Golden Gate Parkway Special Provisions Neighborhood Center Subdistrict Golden Gate Parkway Institional Subdistrict Mission Subdistrict Everglades-Randall Subdistrict Special Exceptions to Conditional Use Locational Criteria AGRICULTURAL / RURAL DESIGNATION Southern Golden Gate Estates Natural Resource Protection Area Overlay OVERLAYS AND SPECIAL FEATURES Rural Settlement Area District Residential Density Bands Interchange Activity Center Subdistrict (As Described in the Future Land Use Element in the GMP) Commercial Western Estates Infill Subdistrict Pine Ridge Road Mixed Use Subdistrict Randall Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict Estates Shopping Center Subdistrict Southbrooke Office Subdistrict Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict COMMERCIAL DISTRICTCollier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 24 of 34 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 385 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 25 of 34 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 386 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 26 of 34 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 387 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 27 of 34 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 388 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 28 of 34 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 389 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) COMMERCIAL WESTERN ESTATES INFILL SUBDISTRICT Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 29 of 34 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 390 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) INTERCHANGE CONDITIONAL GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY USES AREA Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 30 of 34 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 391 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) U30 Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 31 of 34 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 392 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 32 of 34 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 393 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) GOLDEN GATE PKY CONDITIONAL USE SUBDISTRICT: GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY SPECIAL PROVISIONSCOLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA SANTABARBARABLVD.INTERSTATE-75 PREPARED BY: GIS/MAPPING SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT DATE: 6/2016 FILE: GMPA20150002525_CP_2015_3A.MXD 0.1 0 0.1 0.20.05 Miles ¹Legend CONDITIONAL USE SUBDISTRICT: GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY SPECIAL PROVISIONS ADOPTED - MAY 10, 2016 (Ord. No. 2016-12) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 33 of 34 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 394 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) COLLIER BLVDI-75I-75IMMOKALEE RD LIVINGSTON RDCOLLIER BLVDCOLLIER BLVDLIVINGSTON RDPINE RIDGE RD LOGAN BLVD NVANDERBILT BEACH RD Pine Ridge RD Green BLVDOakes BLVDI-75 SLogan BLVD SI-75 NSoll STGolden Gate PKWY 7th AVE SW 1st AVE SW 3rd AVE SW 5th AVE SW 1st AVE NW 5th AVE NW 7th AVE NW 70th ST SW68th ST SW3rd AVE NW 66th ST SWWestport LN Bur Oaks LN Logan BLVD N11th AVE SW 13th AVE SW 15th AVE SW Dogwood WAY Sycamore DR Sea Grass LN Star Grass LN Cedar Tree LN Teak Wood DR Lancewood WAY Shady Oaks LN Coral Wood DR Bottlebrush LN Copper Leaf LN Hidden Oaks LN Painted Leaf LN Boxwood WAY Golden Oaks LN Cherry Wood DR Spanish Oaks LN English Oaks LN Sandalwood LN Sable Ridge LN Autumn Oaks LN Tallowood WAY Hickory Wood DR Napa Woods WAY Vanderbilt Beach RD Standing Oaks LN Tamarind Ridge DR 64th ST SWPalmetto Woods DR Mahogany Ridge DR Livingston Woods LN Hawthorn Woods WAY 63rd ST SW60th ST SW58th ST SWSanta Barbara BLVDPerkins DRSunrise CTBritney LNNeffs WAYCade CTSanta Barbara BLVD1 1 2 3 4 7 5 7 6 8 5 1 4 1 3 6 2 1 4 3 2 7 6 5 3 5 2 1 9 8 9 7 7 5 9 8 7 6 5 2 3 9 4 4 3 2 3 6 1 9 2 5 8 6 4 3 7 9 2 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 7 89 9 9768531 2 4 7 3 6 8 8 6 9 5 4 9 4 2 7 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 2 6 1 3 4 1 80 9 1 8 7 6 1 5 1 4 2 93 3 9 79 3 66 4 8 108 9465 9 8 5 7 52 7 37 8 6 51 5 2 6 4 6 3 2 7 5 8 38 2 9 91 93 64489030 169 31 80 9 6160 96 8 7 9 6 1 8 7 5 6 5 4 4 3 3 2 372 156 52 53 68 69 10 84 85 118 15 44 45 6 60 61 16 16 45 75 7646 17 18 76 85 16 77 24 11 1692 16 84 41 15 88 69 892573 14 40 72 68 57 13 53 17 12 3256 33 48 49 52 128 64 65 80 81 120 37 96 10 9 97 188 11 36 177 178 21 179 11 180 185 22 21 20 186 11 176 187 96 81 98174934336665185082 97 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 3 170 171 174 175 173 58 172 4 11 14 15 13 14 56 12 10 146 41 73 74 89 39 90 38 42 37 40 36 35 34 26 32 33 30 31 29 28 27 26 24 25 23 65 98 96 24 67 958635258555 54 3626 66 2429 83 28 5927 60 34 43 33 918266 76 37 44 75 65 50 97 9823 92 8453 98 97 25 95 8065 97 64 7963 96 8266 89 47 33 34 50 8180 73 49 88 17 48 65 31 4016 64 72 32 18 33 41 90 40 32 49 87 48 25 74 15 71 15 5855 34 24 16 17 63 98423950 31 3126 30 32 10 79 25 28 18 9582 23 41 74 21 18 27 29 47 26 55 66 90 10 27 71 23 23 26 24 87 13 14 39 42 12 20 28 22 26 17 22 25 58 19 9178 24 23 97 75 19 20 31 34 18 9446 30 21 23 28 56 625943 35 33 32 27 26 25 20 29 24 57 18 72 73 30 56 88 89 17 25 17 27 28 26 15 36 25 147 24 92 55 57 40 23 22 57 13 15 91 16 21 17 73 383960 15 61 1837 48 82 22 83 40 14 59 19 81 62 36 84 4158 13 41 20 63 35 42 8085 43 64 42 12 57 44 64 21 45 34 79 43 86 96 20 46 63 52 56 51 47 81 22 65 50 48 33 78 49 65 44 87 59 60 49 55 10 62 39 80 66 58 23 64 70 48 77 32 57 88 56 47 48 45 99 49 55 54 28 14 39 38 55 16 23 15 97 24 32 70 24 4731 71 25 18 62 10 17 46 49 9983 56 50 42 19 80 67 43 54 79 57 75 41 55 66 27 44 71 17 35 8833 59 51 67 33 73 50 12 13 20 65 30 40 32 40 26 74 64 96 71 22 54 77 86 48 97 14 983482 16 81 83 58 94 15 9063 9178 95 87 72 76 31 21 42 41 18 39 33 43 99 10 54 20 73 87 89 72 29 70 74 38 34 47 28 23 22 54 37 39 19 88 78 32 32 24 44 21 93 79 12 13 27 14 94 24 39 89 48 43 23 29 70 38 67 56 92 7727 13 28 52 19 59 30 15 31 18 45 72 29 38 30 46 71 9935 88 39 19 47 62 79 69 68 53 63 78 85 51 75 46 47 60 99 41 87 20 76 43 35 52 77 92 36 37 71 92 31 50 14 22 53 62 36 22 21 61 26 12 42 27 83 46 79 52 58 35 66 34 44 63 87 37 45 91 55 40 61 86 93 55 79 57 59 46 51 95 26 60 30 54 70 76 20 94 61 84 96 88 93 89 91 77 36 56 42 58 82 85 69 51 69 25 70 21 84 94 63 68 64 74 23 78 95 53 80 40 90 95 98 75 86 90 83 72 29 74 85 83 73 89 62 97 85 68 67 88 55 89 58 8475 86 99 90 93 67 84 87 7482 76 87 53 98 45 92 32 61 17 85 53 81 57 99 10 84 43 91 98 63 56 78 29 78 71 7735 31 86 94 62 50 94 96 12 83 13 41 53 95 15 99 9380 14 27 68 16 42 25 51 28 33 46 30 52 67 68 4847 60 64 49 94 53 75 40 32 93 34 7772 36 81 25 18 71 67 55 82 16 59 7978 48 83 84 78 26 76 17 33 61 9276 46 54 49 45 62 81 47 91 69 95 86 90 77 52 34 19 68 85 35 74 42 58 2423 66 82 3840 69 70 62 22 44 86 67 21 75 51 87 59 64 73 37 20 70 43 6152 73 60 97 39 82 99 71 63 72 57 30 69 46 54 93 74 64 36 92 86 75 60 56 35 61 94 98 94 44 30 37 36 53 79 59 28 45 98 19 81 77 96 63 20 85 41 29 78 64 63 91 39 58 50 21 10 67 83 84 93 95 78 43 76 80 27 82 85 44 65 80 38 66 60 45 66 90 99 49 62 35 88 75 69 62 68 51 31 52 34 91 92 42 12 47 31 61 69 63 13 53 59 77 84 23 62 79 90 99 70 30 26 83 14 37 27 68 70 75 97 50 54 61 64 36 28 51 87 46 86 47 98 19 89 47 78 22 94 6746 76 57 59 60 45 52 59 45 18 54 45 14 77 6219 15 90 52 7372 96 40 74 43 30 56 60 76 37 27 21 67 54 91 71 74 10 6144 84 51 53 35 37 29 44 83 28 46 12 75 12 63 38 71 39 76 99 20 21 34 29 55 20 39 97 44 77 9368 38 31 27 66 13 85 99 38 36 94 13 14 58 29 38 23 98 22 15 26 78 69 92 61 92 19 64 62 95 45 21 8670 87 44 70 34 43 52 83 82 53 47 22 43 52 79 30 69 50 84 35 36 42 60 41 55 53 85 62 36 46 86 91 51 68 35 59 54 20 9483 43 9951 13 46 28 37 10 65 67 75 78 93 99 67 93 18 52 98 54 69 35 60 9781 83 82 42 26 7761 22 36 37 45 85 90 70 53 66 67 76 84 89 86 63 9680 44 92 91 74 43 8739 73 86 68 69 50 38 59 71 7256 88 55 38 75 65 90 51 54 55 39 71 48 40 79 70 29 95 64 5842 49 19 47 54 48 41 58 74 87 41 42 57 74 66 91 69 51 96 67 59 27 70 68 58 73 28 56 49 92 69 80 79 95 50 57 78 7172 77 93 76 72 94 75 2223 74 19 73 4445 82 81 72 66 83 2124 88 67 84 43 88 46 85 18 65 11 89 20 89 86 68 2542 87 87 47 90 88 90 19 64 89 26 99 69 41 86 98 91 48 33 97 18 63 27 70 96 40 85 95 49 92 62 17 94 71 28 84 93 39 92 93 5061 16 72 2938 83 51 94 17 15 60 30 73 37 95 82 5259 1431 74 157 36 8196 53 10 58 1332 75 35 8097 5457 1233 7679 34 98 55567778 57 99 158159 58 89 87 160161162 95 81 163 16 12 164 88 165 148 166 8E 11 167168 15 14 96 57 17 643233 40 4125 73 88 8065 897224 814948 56 97 12 112 114 13 113 28 15 29 149 15 111 44 14 47 13 60 13 61 76 12 11 10 12 111 16 114 5E 6E 7E 16 110 105 115 119 111 8E 110 100 118 114 77 10 115 109 127 117 116 117 101 126 15 105 115 122 10 116 114 14 125 13 8W 16 103 113 112 12 104 124 105 107 15 106 92 109 10 108 123 110 110 126 101 105 16 112 17 7 100 31 11 11 113 109 113 125 14 108 93 107 104 106 114 19 112 16 113 10 12 124 10 12 8W 111 128 13 119 118 117 119 118 14 111 111 111 111111 111 111 111 111 123 115 114 119 113 7W 6W 5W 106 105 121 120 107121 149 150 151 152 123 153 110 154 112 119 118 117 110 115 110 112 114 116 113 117 115 114 113 116 112 110 118 155 116 113 114 114 112 119 156 115 117 113112 115110 119 116 117 118 114 110 115 118117 116 117 119 157 117 110 116 119 116 118 115 110 113 112 112 118 115 110 116 117 119 119 118 158 159 113118 160 161 117 114 162 163 115116 164 165 166 167 168 110 169 170 112 171 113 172 133 134 114 135 136 115 137 138 116 139 140 119 117 141 118 142 117 143 116 118 144 115 114 119 113 145 112 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 105 106 122 104 103 127 106103 107 121104105120 115 102 122 116 117 118 119 103 108 101 104 106 104105126127148 103106125128 102 147 107124129146 101108123130 100 145 102 109122 101 131 100 144 103 106 104 121 102 103 103 104 125 101 124 102 103 127 107 102 100 108 100 120 101 101 102 120 132 109 104 105 103100 125 100 123 126 127 101 102 128 105 143 106 126 109 108 102 101 103 100 107 109 106 108 128 126 125 100 127 102 109 120 108 107 124 123 120 101 100 123 133 105 122 121 106 100 102 103 101 104 122 109 102 101 124108 100 142 125 102 107 101 106 100 107 103 109 108 126 102 120 100 121 103 104 105 109 106 101 109 102 108 107 106103 134141 113 135 112 140 184183182 136 181 139 180179 137 178 138 177176175174173 105 132 104 109 100 131 105 108 120 130 107129 102 101 106 103 104 128 105 105 106 107 127 108 104 120 109 126 103125 102124 122 121 101 123 120 124 123 125 100 126 121 127 122 128 129 139 140 138 137 136 135 134 133 141 132 142 143 107 144 145 124 122 120 128 121105120104 121 155 892524 2120 4 22 109 150 104 112 111130131 4 1 107 49 81 11 13 12 10 116 104 107 19 116 155 8840 16 14 18 154 113 153 112 114 115 152 151 3 32 111 106 111 108 107 108 114 5 110 5 ¹ SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS TO CONDITIONAL USE LOCATIONAL CRITERIAIN GOLDEN GATE ESTATES North 180 feet of Tract 107, Unit 30. Tract 22, Unit 97 PREPARED BY: BETH YANG, AICP GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT FILE: Special Exceptions to Conditional Use.mxd DATE: 05/2018 0 0.5 1 1.50.25 Miles ADOPTED - XXXX (Ord. No. XXXX) Legend Conditional Use Exceptions Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 34 of 34 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 395 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 396 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 397 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 398 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element i Words underlined are added; words stuck through are deleted. GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN RURAL GOLDEN GATE ESTATES SUB-ELEMENT Prepared by Collier County Zoning Division Prepared for COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Adopted (date) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 1 of 43 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 399 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element ii Words underlined are added; words stuck through are deleted. AMENDMENTS TO COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN: RURAL GOLDEN GATE ESTATES SUB-ELEMENT DATE AMENDED ORDINANCE NO. (date), 2019 2019-(#) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 2 of 43 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 400 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element iii Words underlined are added; words stuck through are deleted. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page A. Goals, Objectives and Policies 1 B. Land Use Designation Description Section 13 1. ESTATES DESIGANATION 13 A. Estates – Mixed Use District 1. Residential Estates Subdistrict 2. Neighborhood Center Subdistrict 3. Conditional Uses Subdistrict 4. Mission Subdistrict 5. Everglades – Randall Subdistrict B. Estates – Commercial District 1. Randall Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict 2. Estates Shopping Center Subdistrict 2. AGRICULTURE/RURAL DESIGNATION 30 A. Rural Settlement Area District 3. OVERLAYS AND SPECIAL FEAUTURES 31 A. Southern Golden Gate Estates Natural Resource Protection Overlay C. List of Maps 32 Golden Gate Area Future Land Use Map Golden Gate Estates Neighborhood Centers Wilson Boulevard/Golden Gate Boulevard Center Golden Gate Boulevard/Everglades Boulevard Center Immokalee Road/Everglades Boulevard Center Randall Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict Mission Subdistrict Estates Shopping Center Subdistrict Estates Shopping Center Subdistrict Conceptual Plan Everglades – Randall Subdistrict Immokalee Road/Randall Boulevard Planning Study Area Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 3 of 43 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 401 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element 1 Words underlined are added; words stuck through are deleted. A. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES GOAL 1: TO GUIDE LAND USE AND PUBLIC FACILITY DECISION MAKING AND TO BALANCE THE NEED TO PROVIDE BASIC SERVICES WITH NATURAL RESOURCE CONCERNS THROUGH A WELL PLANNED MIX OF COMPATIBLE LAND USES WHICH ENSURE THE HEALTH, SAFETY, WELFARE, AND QUALITY OF LIFE OF THE LOCAL RESIDENTS. OBJECTIVE 1.1: Develop new or revised uses of land consistent with designations outlined on the Rural Golden Gate Estates Future Land Use Map and provisions found in the Land Use Designation Description Section of this Sub-Element. Policy 1.1.1: The Policies under the above Objective shall identify the Future Land Use Designations, Districts, and Subdistricts for the Rural Golden Gate Estates. Policy 1.1.2: The Land Use Designation Description Section of this Element shall provide the standards and permitted uses for Rural Golden Gate Estates Future Land Use Districts and Subdistricts. Policy 1.1.3: The Rural Golden Gate Estates Future Land Use Map and companion Future Land Use Designations, Districts, and Subdistricts shall be binding on all development orders unless otherwise permitted in this Master Plan effective with the adoption of this Master Plan. Policy 1.1.4: The ESTATES Future Land Use Designation shall include Future Land Use Districts and Subdistricts for: A. ESTATES – MIXED USE DISTRICT 1. Residential Estates Subdistrict 2. Neighborhood Center Subdistrict 3. Conditional Uses Subdistrict 4. Mission Subdistrict 5. Everglades – Randall Subdistrict B. ESTATES – COMMERCIAL DISTRICT 1. Randall Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict 2. Estates Shopping Center Subdistrict Policy 1.1.5: The AGRICULTURAL/RURAL Future Land Use Designation shall include the following Future Land Use District: A. RURAL SETTLEMENT AREA DISTRICT Policy 1.1.6: Overlays and Special Features shall include: Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 4 of 43 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 402 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element 2 Words underlined are added; words stuck through are deleted. A. Southern Golden Gate Estates Natural Resource Protection Area Overlay Policy 1.1.7: Conditional Use requests within Rural Golden Gate Estates shall adhere to the guidelines outlined in the Conditional Uses Subdistrict. Policy 1.1.8: To obtain Conditional Use approval, a super majority vote (minimum of 4 votes) by the Board of Zoning Appeals shall be required. Policy 1.1.9: No development orders shall be issued inconsistent with the Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub- Element with the exception of those unimproved properties granted a positive determination through the Zoning Re-evaluation Program and identified on the Future Land Use Map Series as properties consistent by Policy and those development orders issued pursuant to conditional uses and rezones approved based on the County-Wide Future Land Use Element (adopted January 10, 1989, Ordinance 89-05) which was in effect at the time of approval. Any subsequent development orders shall also be reviewed for consistency with the Growth Management Plan based on the County-Wide Future Land Use Element. Policy 1.1.10: The sites containing existing public educational plants and ancillary plants, and the undeveloped sites owned by the Collier County School Board for future public educational plants and ancillary plants, within the Rural Golden Gate Estates area, are depicted on the Future Land Use Map Series in the countywide FLUE and on the Public School Facilities Element Map Series, and referenced in FLUE Policy 5.14 and Intergovernmental Coordination Element Policy 1.2.6. All of these sites are subject to the general Interlocal Agreement, adopted on May 15, 2003 by the Collier County School Board and on May 27, 2003 by the Board of County Commissioners, and as subsequently amended and restated, with an effective date of December 2008, and subject to the implementing land development regulations to be adopted. OBJECTIVE 1.2: Ensure public facilities are provided at an acceptable level of service. Policy 1.2.1: Requests for new uses of land shall be subject to level of service standards and concurrency requirements for public facilities as outlined in the Capital Improvement Element of the Growth Management Plan. OBJECTIVE 1.3: Protect and preserve the valuable natural resources within the Rural Golden Gate Estates. Policy 1.3.1: The County shall protect and preserve natural resources within the Rural Golden Gate Estates in accordance with the Objectives and Policies contained within Goals 6 and 7 of the Collier County Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME). Policy 1.3.2: As provided for in CCME Policy 6.1.1, the subdivision of tracts up to 13 acres in size and designated Residential Estates Subdistrict shall not trigger preserve requirements. Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 5 of 43 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 403 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element 3 Words underlined are added; words stuck through are deleted. Policy 1.3.3: Collier County shall coordinate its planning and permitting activities within the Rural Golden Gate Estates with all other applicable environmental planning, permitting and regulatory agencies to ensure that all Federal, State and local natural resource protection regulations are being enforced. OBJECTIVE 1.4: Provide a living environment within the Rural Golden Gate Estates, which is aesthetically acceptable and protects the quality of life. Policy 1.4.1: Collier County shall provide a living environment that is aesthetically acceptable and protects the quality of life through the enforcement of applicable codes and laws. Policy 1.4.2: The County's Code Enforcement Board shall strictly enforce the Land Development Code and other applicable codes and laws to control the illegal storage of machinery, vehicles and junk, and the illegal operation of commercial activities within the Rural Golden Gate Estates. GOAL 2: TO RECOGNIZE THAT THE AREA WHICH LIES SOUTH OF INTERSTATE 75 (ALLIGATOR ALLEY) TO US 41 (TAMIAMI TRAIL) IS AN AREA OF SPECIAL ENVIRONMENTAL SENSITIVITY AND IS BIOLOGICALLY AND HYDROLOGICALLY IMPORTANT THROUGH PARTICIPATION IN THE PICAYUNE STRAND RESTORATION PROJECT AS PART OF THE FEDERAL SAVE OUR EVERGLADES PROGRAM. BASED UPON SUCH CONDITIONS, THE STATE HAS ACQUIRED OWNERSHIP OF ALL LANDS WITHIN THE SOUTHERN GOLDEN GATE ESTATES (SGGE) PICAYUNE STRAND RESTORATION PROJECT AREA. GOAL 3: TO PROVIDE FOR LIMITED COMMERCIAL SERVICES AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR PURPOSES OF SERVING THE RURAL NEEDS OF GOLDEN GATE ESTATES RESIDENTS, SHORTENING VEHICULAR TRIPS, AND PRESERVING RURAL CHARACTER. OBJECTIVE 3.1: Meet the locational and rural design criteria contained within the Estates Designation, Estates- Mixed Use District, Neighborhood Center Subdistrict and Conditional Use Subdistrict of this Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element, of the Collier County Growth Management Plan when considering the placement and designation of Neighborhood Centers and Conditional Uses within Rural Golden Gate Estates. Policy 3.1.1: Neighborhood Centers within Rural Golden Gate Estates shall be subject to the locational and rural design criteria established within the Estates Designation, Estates – Mixed Use District, Neighborhood Center Subdistrict of this Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element, of the Collier County Growth Management Plan. Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 6 of 43 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 404 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element 4 Words underlined are added; words stuck through are deleted. Policy 3.1.2: Conditional Uses within Rural Golden Gate Estates shall be subject to locational and dimensional criteria established within the Conditional Use Subdistrict in the Land Use Designation Description section of this Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element. OBJECTIVE 3.2: Provide for new commercial development within Neighborhood Centers and other Commercial Land Use Designations. Policy 3.2.1: Within one year of the completion of the Randall Blvd. and Oil Well Rd. Corridor study, the County Manager or designee shall initiate an evaluation of the future land uses along Immokalee Rd. in the vicinity of Randall Blvd., Oil Well Rd. and Wilson Blvd. (as generally shown on the Immokalee Rd./Randall Blvd. Planning Study Area Map) and make recommendations to the Board of County Commissioners for any proposed changes to the future land uses. GOAL 4: TO PRESERVE THE AREA’S RURAL CHARACTER, AS DEFINED BY LARGE WOODED LOTS, THE KEEPING OF LIVESTOCK, THE ABILITY TO GROW CROPS, WILDLIFE ACTIVITY, ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP, LOW-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, AND LIMITATIONS ON COMMERCIAL AND CONDITIONAL USES. OBJECTIVE 4.1: Balance the provision of public infrastructure with the need to preserve the rural character of Rural Golden Gate Estates. Policy 4.1.1: Future road and bridge improvements in Rural Golden Gate Estates shall not only provide for safety and reasonable mobility, but shall also contribute to the rural character of the area. Transportation improvements shall be designed in context with their setting. Policy 4.1.2 The County shall initiate architectural standard requirements in the Land Development Code within two years of adoption that apply to commercial, conditional use and essential services facilities, reflecting the rural character of the Estates area and providing coherence and area identity. Policy 4.1.3: The County Manager or designee shall create a public network of greenway corridors within Rural Golden Gate Estates that interconnects public lands and permanently protected green space. The greenway network shall consist of interconnected trails and paths that allow people to move about the Estates area by means other than motorized vehicles. All greenways shall be constructed within existing or future public easements or rights-of-way. In creating the greenway network, the County shall not employ eminent domain proceedings. OBJECTIVE 4.2: Provide for the protection of the rural character of Rural Golden Gate Estates. Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 7 of 43 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 405 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element 5 Words underlined are added; words stuck through are deleted. Policy 4.2.1: Rural character protection provisions shall provide for the preservation of such rural amenities as, but not limited to, wooded lots, the keeping of livestock, the ability to grow crops, wildlife activity, and low-density residential development. Policy 4.2.2: The growing of food crops and/or the keeping of livestock on properties within Rural Golden Gate Estates shall be permitted, provided that such activities are conducted according to the Land Development Code. Policy 4.2.3: Rural character shall be further protected by resisting site-specific Master Plan changes that are out of scale or character with the rural quality of Rural Golden Gate Estates. Policy 4.2.4: Recognizing the low density in Rural Golden Gate Estates, the County will initiate a review of written notification requirements in the Land Development Code and the Administrative Code related to land use petitions in Golden Gate Estates, within 1 year of adoption, and consider increasing the specified distance, with particular attention to properties located on dead-end streets. Policy 4.2.5: Consistent with public safety requirements and best practices for rural areas, outdoor lighting within Rural Golden Gate Estates shall be placed, constructed and maintained in such manner as to prevent or reduce light pollution. In implementing this Policy, the County shall: a. Adhere to the “Collier County Lighting Standards” (County Manager’s Office Standards dated January 6, 2017) as amended, with respect to new and existing County owned or maintained sites and structures. b. Continue to coordinate with FPL and FDOT to improve roadway and security lighting consistent with International Dark Skies Association best practices. c. Consider changes to the Land Development Code and other applicable ordinances to create voluntary or mandatory outdoor lighting standards for commercial, residential or other uses consistent with International Dark Skies Association best practices, and determine the extent such standards apply to new or existing development. OBJECTIVE 4.3: Encourage the preservation of natural resources in Rural Golden Gate Estates, including protection and enhancement of its watershed. Policy 4.3.1: The Land Development Code shall continue to allow and further encourage the preservation of native vegetation and wildlife indigenous to the Rural Golden Gate Estates. Policy 4.3.2: The County shall continue to pursue the Watershed Management Plan initiatives in Rural Golden Gate Estates as financial and staff resources become available. Policy 4.3.3: The County shall encourage the combination of parcels smaller than 2.25 acres with other parcels in order to preserve and enhance low-density environmental advantages. Within two years of Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 8 of 43 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 406 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element 6 Words underlined are added; words stuck through are deleted. adoption of this policy, County staff will present recommendations for property owner incentives to the Board of County Commissioners. Policy 4.3.4: The County will evaluate the use of transferable development rights for the purpose of securing the preservation of wetland or other environmentally significant land within Rural Golden Gate Estates, in a timeframe directed by the Board. Policy 4.3.5: Within two years of adoption, the County, in coordination with the Floodplain Management Committee, will initiate a study on the feasibility of dispersed water management (DWM) for single family Estates lots, and determine the extent to which it will rely on voluntary, incentive or mandatory provisions and whether provisions will apply to developed and undeveloped Estates parcels. Policy 4.3.6: The County will continue to identify and implement educational opportunities related to water resources for parcel owners, homeowners, builders, real estate professionals and the public to aid in understanding and addressing site-specific financial and environmental impacts as well as area-wide impacts to water resources. Policy 4.3.7: The County will periodically coordinate with the South Florida Water Management District to review the Level of Service Standards for primary water management canals within the County and their effect on Rural Golden Gate Estates. Policy 4.3.8: The County shall continue to pursue a best management practices approach to making septage treatment available to residents and businesses within Rural Golden Gate Estates, as a component of bio-solid processing, either directly, through a private entity, or through a public - private partnership. GOAL 5: TO PROVIDE FOR A SAFE AND EFFICIENT COUNTY AND LOCAL ROADWAY NETWORK, WHILE AT THE SAME TIME SEEKING TO PRESERVE THE RURAL CHARACTER OF RURAL GOLDEN GATE ESTATES IN FUTURE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE GOLDEN GATE AREA. OBJECTIVE 5.1: Increase the number of route alternatives for traffic moving through the Rural Golden Gate Estates Area in both east-west and north-south directions, consistent with neighborhood traffic safety considerations, and consistent with the preservation of the area’s rural character. Policy 5.1.1: In planning to increase the number of route alternatives through the Rural Golden Gate Estates Area, Collier County will prioritize the following routes over other alternatives: a. The extension of Vanderbilt Beach Road from its current terminus to DeSoto Boulevard. b. The development of a north-south connection from the eastern terminus of White Boulevard to Golden Gate Boulevard. c. The development of a new east-west roadway crossing the Estates Area south of Golden Gate Boulevard. Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 9 of 43 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 407 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element 7 Words underlined are added; words stuck through are deleted. Policy 5.1.2: The County shall coordinate with FDOT and the Metropolitan Planning Organization to submit a revised interchange justification report for an interchange at I-75 in the vicinity of Everglades Blvd. (Section 31-34, Township 49, Range 28). Policy 5.1.3: Everglades Blvd., between Golden Gate Blvd and I-75, shall not be expanded beyond 4 lanes. OBJECTIVE 5.2: Increase linkages within the local road system for the purposes of limiting traffic on arterials and major collectors within Rural Golden Gate Estates, shortening vehicular trips, and increasing overall road system capacity. Policy 5.2.1: The County shall continue to explore alternative financing methods to facilitate both east - west and north-south bridging of canals within Rural Golden Gate Estates. Policy 5.2.2: The County shall update the 2008 Bridge Study to prioritize bridge construction based on emergency response times, evacuation times, cost components, anticipated development patterns and other considerations and shall report its recommendations to the Board of County Commissioners within two years of adoption of this policy. Policy 5.2.3: Planning and right-of-way acquisition for bridges within the Estates Area local road system shall include consideration of the costs and benefits of including sidewalks and bike lanes. Policy 5.2.4: Sidewalks and bike lanes shall provide access to government facilities, schools, commercial areas and the planned Metropolitan Planning Organization greenway network. Policy 5.2.5: Planning, funding and implementation of potential greenway trails shall be coordinated between the County and the Metropolitan Planning Organization. OBJECTIVE 5.3: Explore alternative financing methods to accelerate paving of lime rock roads. Policy 5.3.1: The County will consider the acceleration of the paving of lime rock roads, including a cost/benefit analysis, in its annual budget review. GOAL 6: TO PROTECT THE LIVES AND PROPERTY OF THE RESIDENTS OF THE RURAL GOLDEN GATE ESTATES, AS WELL AS THE HEALTH OF THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT, THROUGH THE PROVISION OF EMERGENCY SERVICES THAT PREPARE FOR, MITIGATE, AND RESPOND TO, NATURAL AND MANMADE DISASTERS. Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 10 of 43 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 408 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element 8 Words underlined are added; words stuck through are deleted. OBJECTIVE 6.1: Coordinate with local emergency services officials in engineering and constructing road improvements within Rural Golden Gate Estates to ensure that the access needs of fire department, police and emergency management personnel and vehicles are met. Policy 6.1.1: Collier County shall hold at least one annual public meeting with Golden Gate Area emergency services providers and the local civic association in order to ensure that emergency needs are addressed during the acquisition of right-of-way for design and construction of road improvements. Policy 6.1.2: Collier County shall continue to coordinate with Golden Gate Area emergency services providers to prioritize necessary road improvements related to emergency evacuation needs. OBJECTIVE 6.2: Ensure that the needs of all applicable emergency services providers are included and coordinated in the overall public project design for capital improvement projects within the Rural Golden Gate Estates. Policy 6.2.1: Preparation of Collier County’s annual Schedule of Capital Improvements for projects within the Rural Golden Gate Estates shall be coordinated with the independent Fire Districts that serve Rural Golden Gate Estates (Fire Districts), public and private utilities, Emergency Medical Services Department and the Collier County Sheriff’s Department to ensure that public project designs are consistent with the needs of these agencies. Policy 6.2.2: Fire Districts, Collier County Emergency Medical Services Department and the Collier County Sheriff’s Department will receive copies of pre-construction plans for capital improvement projects in Rural Golden Gate Estates and will be invited to review and comment on plans for the public projects. OBJECTIVE 6.3: Maintain and implement public information programs through the Collier County Bureau of Emergency Services, Collier County Sheriff’s Department, Fire Districts, and other appropriate agencies, to inform residents and visitors of the Greater Golden Gate Area regarding the means to prevent, prepare for, and cope with, man-made and natural disasters. Policy 6.3.1: The Fire Districts that serve the Golden Gate area, and other appropriate agencies, shall embark on an education program to assist residents in knowing and understanding the value and need for prescribed burning on public lands in high risk fire areas. Policy 6.3.2: The Fire Districts and Collier County Bureau of Emergency Services shall actively promote the Firewise Communities Program through public education in Rural Golden Gate Estates. Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 11 of 43 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 409 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element 9 Words underlined are added; words stuck through are deleted. Policy 6.3.3 Fire Districts and the Collier County Bureau of Emergency Services shall hold one or more annual “open house” presentations in the Golden Gate Area emphasizing issues related to wildfires, flooding, emergency access and general emergency management. OBJECTIVE 6.4: Pursue appropriate planning and mitigation measures to address the threat of wildfires in Rural Golden Gate Estates. Policy 6.4.1: Collier County shall evaluate the Land Development Code for Rural Golden Gate Estates requirements that are found to be inconsistent with acceptable fire prevention standards. This evaluation process shall be coordinated with the Fire Districts and the Collier County Bureau of Emergency Services. Policy 6.4.2: Within one year of adoption, the County shall begin to evaluate the need to purchase or dedicate parcels within Rural Golden Gate Estates for the purpose of providing staging areas for wildfire prevention activities for the Florida Forest Service, Fire Districts, Collier County or other agency use and will consider whether potential parcels may be used for other public purposes including ride sharing or park and ride facilities allowed by Conditional Use. Policy 6.4.3: The County shall explore annually, options for funding wildfire prevention measures undertaken by the County, Florida Forest Service and/or Fire Districts, including but not limited to Golden Gate Estates Municipal Services Taxing Units (MSTU) revenue, grant funding and general fund revenue. Policy 6.4.4: The County shall review annually and update as necessary, all interlocal agreements and mutual aid agreements to assure coordination of legal, procedural and educational components of wildfire prevention. Policy 6.4.5: County-owned property within Rural Golden Gate Estates shall be subject to an active, on-going management plan to reduce the damage caused by wildfires originating from County-owned properties. [REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 12 of 43 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 410 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element 10 Words underlined are added; words stuck through are deleted. B. LAND USE DESIGNATION DESCRIPTION SECTION The following section describes the three land use designations shown on the Rural Golden Gate Estates Future Land Use Map. These designations generally indicate the types of land uses for which zoning may be requested. However, these land use designations do not guarantee that a zoning request will be approved. Requests may be denied by the Board of County Commissioners based on criteria in the Land Development Code or in special studies completed for the County. 1. ESTATES DESIGNATION This designation is characterized by low density semi-rural residential lots with limited opportunities for other land uses. Typical lots are 2.25 acres in size. However, there are some legal non-conforming lots as small as 1.14 acres. Residential density is limited to a maximum of one unit per 2.25 gross acres, or one unit per legal non-conforming lot of record, exclusive of guesthouses. Multiple family dwelling units, duplexes, and other structures containing two or more principal dwellings, are prohibited in all Districts and Subdistricts in this Designation. Generally, the Estates Designation also accommodates future non-residential uses, including: a. Conditional uses and essential services as defined in the Land Development Code, except as prohibited in the Neighborhood Center Subdistrict. Also, refer to the Conditional Uses Subdistrict. b. Parks, open space and recreational uses. c. Group Housing shall be permitted subject to the definitions and regulations as outlined in the Collier County Land Development Code (Ordinance No. 04-41, as amended) and consistent with locational requirements in Florida Statutes (Chapter 419.001 F.S.). d. Schools and school facilities in the Estates Designation north of I-75, and where feasible and mutually acceptable, co-locate schools with other public facilities, such as parks, libraries and community centers to the extent possible. Group Housing includes the following type facilities: aa. Family Care Facility if occupied by not more than six (6) persons shall be permitted in residential areas. bb. Group Care Facility, cc. Care Units, dd. Adult Congregate Living Facilities, and ee. Nursing Homes. All of the above uses shall be consistent with all of the Goals, Objectives and Policies of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan. A. Estates ‒ Mixed-Use District 1. Residential Estates Subdistrict Single-family residential development is allowed within this Subdistrict at a maximum density of one unit per 2.25 gross acres, or one unit per legal non-conforming lot of record, exclusive of guesthouses. 2. Neighborhood Center Subdistrict Recognizing the need to provide basic goods, services and amenities to Estates residents, Neighborhood Centers have been designated on the Rural Golden Gate Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 13 of 43 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 411 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element 11 Words underlined are added; words stuck through are deleted. Estates Future Land Use Map. The Neighborhood Center designation does not guarantee that commercial zoning will be granted. The designation only provides the opportunity to request commercial zoning. a. The Collier County Land Development Code shall be amended to provide rural design criteria to regulate all new commercial development within Neighborhood Centers. b. Locations Neighborhood Centers are located along major roadways and are distributed within Rural Golden Gate Estates according to commercial demand estimates. (See Golden Gate Estates Neighborhood Centers Map). The centers are designed to concentrate all new commercial zoning, and conditional uses, as allowed in the Estates Zoning District, in locations where traffic impacts can be readily accommodated and to avoid strip and disorganized patterns of commercial and conditional use development. Three Neighborhood Centers are established as follows: i. Wilson Boulevard and Golden Gate Boulevard Center. This center consists of three quadrants at the intersection of Wilson and Golden Gate Boulevards (See Map 10). The NE and SE quadrants of the Center consist of Tract 1 and 2, Unit 14, Tract 17, Unit 13 and the western half of Tract 18, Unit 13 Golden Gate Estates. The NE quadrant of Wilson and Golden Gate Boulevards is approximately 8.45 acres. The parcels within the NE quadrant shall be interconnected and share access to Golden Gate Boulevard and Wilson Boulevard to minimize connections to these two major roadways. The SE quadrant of Wilson and Golden Gate Boulevards is 7.15 acres, allows 5.00 acres of commercial development, and allocates 2.15 acres to project buffering and right-of-way for Golden Gate Boulevard and Wilson Boulevard. The SW quadrant of the Center is approximately 11.78 acres in size and consists of Tract 124, 125, and the north 150 feet of Tract 126, Unit 12 of Golden Gate Estates. ii. Everglades Boulevard and Golden Gate Boulevard Center. This Center consists of all four quadrants at the intersection of Everglades and Golden Gate Boulevards (See Golden Gate Boulevard/Everglades Boulevard Center Map). The NE quadrant of the Center is approximately 5.46 acres in size and consists of Tract 1, Unit 77 of Golden Gate Estates. The SE quadrant of the Center is approximately 5.46 acres in size and consists of Tract 97, Unit 81 of Golden Gate Estates. The NW quadrant of the Center is approximately 5.46 acres in size and consists of Tract 128, Unit 76 of Golden Gate Estates. The SW quadrant of the Center is approximately 5.46 acres in size and consists of Tract 96, Unit 81 of Golden Gate Estates. iii. The Immokalee Road and Everglades Boulevard Center This Center is located in the southwest and the southeast quadrants of the intersection. This Center consists of three Tracts: Tract 128, Unit 47, is 5.15 + acres and is located within the southwest quadrant of the Center, south of the fire station; and, Tracts 113 and 16, Unit 46, are 4.05 +acres and 5.15 + acres respectively, and are within the southeast quadrant of the Center, east of the fire station. Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 14 of 43 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 412 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element 12 Words underlined are added; words stuck through are deleted. c. Criteria for land uses at the centers are as follows: i. Commercial uses shall be limited to intermediate commercial so as to provide for a wider variety of goods and services in areas that have a higher degree of automobile traffic. These uses shall be similar to C-1, C-2, or C-3 zoning districts outlined in the Collier County Land Development Code (Ordinance No. 04-41, as amended), except as prohibited below. ii. Parcels immediately adjacent to commercial zoning within the Neighborhood Centers located at the intersections Golden Gate Boulevard and Wilson Boulevard (excluding the SW quadrant), Golden Gate Boulevard and Everglades Boulevard, Everglades Boulevard and Immokalee Road may qualify for Conditional Use under the transitional conditional use provision of the Conditional Uses Subdistrict of this Master Plan Element. iv. A single project shall utilize no more than 50% of the total allowed commercial acreage. This percentage may be increased at the discretion of the Board of County Commissioners. v. The project shall make provisions for shared parking arrangements with adjoining developments. vi. Access points shall be limited to one per 180 feet commencing from the right - of-way of the major intersecting streets of the Neighborhood Center. A maximum of three curb cuts per quadrant shall be allowed. vii. Driveways and curb cuts shall be consolidated with adjoining developments, whenever possible. viii. Driveways accessing parcels on opposite sides of the roadway shall be in direct alignment, except when the roadway median between the two parcels has no opening. ix. Projects shall provide a 25-foot wide landscape buffer abutting the external right-of-way. This buffer shall contain two staggered rows of trees that shall be spaced no more than 30 feet on center, and a double row hedge at least 24 inches in height at time of planting and attaining a minimum of three feet height within one year. A minimum of 50% of the 25-foot wide buffer area shall be comprised of a meandering bed of shrubs and ground covers other than grass. Existing native trees must be retained within this 25-foot wide buffer area to aid in achieving this buffer requirement; other existing native vegetation shall be retained, where possible, to aid in achieving this buffer requirement. Water retention/detention areas shall be allowed in this buffer area if left in natural state, and drainage conveyance through the buffer area shall be allowed if necessary to reach an external outfall. a. All buildings shall have tile roofs, ‘Old Style Florida’ metal roofs, or decorative parapet walls above the roofline. The buildings shall be finished in light, subdued colors, except for decorative trim. x. Building heights shall be limited to one (1) story, with a maximum height of thirty-five (35) feet. This provision only applies east of Collier Boulevard. xi. All lighting facilities shall be architecturally–designed, and shall be limited to a height of twenty-five (25) feet. Such lighting facilities shall be shielded from neighboring residential land uses and consistent with Policy 5.2.4. Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 15 of 43 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 413 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element 13 Words underlined are added; words stuck through are deleted. xii. Commercial uses shall encourage pedestrian traffic through placement of sidewalks, pedestrian walkways, and marked crosswalks within parking areas. Adjacent projects shall coordinate placement of sidewalks so that a continuous pathway through the Neighborhood Center is created. xiii. All buildings and projects within any single specific quadrant of the Subdistrict shall utilize a common architectural theme. This theme shall be applicable to both building design and signage. xiv. No building footprint shall exceed 5,000 square feet, unless the project is submitted in the form of a PUD. Walkways or courtyards shall connect adjacent buildings. This provision only applies east of Collier Boulevard. xv. Drive-through establishments shall be limited to banks, with no more than 3 lanes; the drive-through areas shall be architecturally integrated with the rest of the building. This provision only applies east of Collier Boulevard. xvi. Fences or walls may be constructed on the commercial side of the required landscape buffer between adjacent commercial and residential uses. If constructed, such fences or walls shall not exceed five (5) feet in height. Walls shall be constructed of brick or stone. Fences shall be of wood or concrete post or rail types, and shall be of open design (not covered by slats, boards or wire). xvii. Projects directly abutting residential property (property zoned E-Estates and without an approved conditional use) shall provide, at a minimum, a seventy- five (75) feet wide buffer in which no parking uses are permitted. Twenty-five (25) feet of the width of the buffer along the developed area shall be a landscape buffer. A minimum of fifty (50) feet of the buffer width shall consist of retained native vegetation and must be consistent with subsection 3.05.07H. of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC). The native vegetation retention area may consist of a perimeter berm and be used for water management detention. Any newly constructed berm shall be revegetated to meet subsection 3.05.07H. of the LDC (native vegetation replanting requirements). Additionally, in order to be considered for approval, use of the native vegetation retention area for water management purposes shall meet the following criteria: a. There shall be no adverse impacts to the native vegetation being retained. The additional water directed to this area shall not increase the annual hydro-period unless it is proven that such would have no adverse impact to the existing vegetation. b. If the project requires permitting by the South Florida Water Management District, the project shall provide a letter or official document from the District indicating that the native vegetation within the retention area will not have to be removed to comply with water management requirements. If the District cannot or will not supply such a letter, then the native vegetation retention area shall not be used for water management. c. If the project is reviewed by Collier County, the County engineer shall provide evidence that no removal of native vegetation is necessary to facilitate the necessary storage of water in the water management area. xix. Projects within the Neighborhood Center Subdistrict that are submitted as PUDs shall provide a functional public open-space component. Such public open-space shall be developed as green space within a pedestrian-accessible Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 16 of 43 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 414 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element 14 Words underlined are added; words stuck through are deleted. courtyard, as per Section 4.06.03B. of the Collier County Land Development Code, as in effect at the time of P.U.D. approval. xx. The following principal permitted uses are prohibited within Neighborhood Centers: a. Drinking Places (5813) and Liquor Stores (5921) b. Mail Order Houses (5961) c. Merchandizing Machine Operators (5962) d. Power Laundries (7211) e. Crematories (7261) (Does not include non-crematory Funeral Parlors) f. Radio, TV Representatives (7313) and Direct Mail Advertising Services (7331) g. NEC Recreational Shooting Ranges, Waterslides, etc. (7999) h. General Hospitals (8062), Psychiatric Hospitals (8063), and Specialty Hospitals (8069) i. Elementary and Secondary Schools (8211), Colleges (8221), Junior Colleges (8222) j. Libraries (8231) k. Correctional Institutions (9223) l. Waste Management (9511) m. Homeless Shelters and Soup Kitchens. xxi. The following additional restrictions and standards apply to Tract 124 and the north 150 feet of Tract 126, within the southwest quadrant of the Wilson Boulevard and Golden Gate Boulevard Center: a. Commercial uses shall be limited to the following: 1. medical offices and clinics and professional offices, except surveyors; and, 2. medical related uses, such as a wellness center. b. The ordinance rezoning this property to allow commercial uses shall include the following requirements: 1. no less than sixty percent (60%) of the gross square footage shall be designated for medical offices and clinics; and, 2. parking for the entire project shall be that required for medical office or clinic use by the Land Development Code (Ordinance No. 04-41, as amended), so as to allow 100 percent medical office use. c. Parking lot lighting shall be restricted to bollards except as may be required to comply with lighting standards in the Land Development Code (Ordinance No. 04-41, as amended) and other governing regulations. d. The Neighborhood Center boundaries of this quadrant shall not be further expanded. 3. Conditional Uses Subdistrict Various types of conditional uses are permitted in the Estates zoning district within the Rural Golden Gate Estates area. In order to control the location and spacing of new conditional uses, one of the following four sets of criteria shall be met: a. Essential Services Conditional Use Provisions: Those Essential Services Conditional Uses, as identified within Section 2.01.03 G. of the Collier County Land Development Code, may be allowed anywhere within Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 17 of 43 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 415 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element 15 Words underlined are added; words stuck through are deleted. the Estates Zoning District, except as prohibited in certain Neighborhood Centers, and are described as: 1. electric or gas generating plants, 2. effluent tanks, 3. major re-pump stations, 4. sewage treatment plants, including percolation ponds, 5. hospitals and hospices, 6. water aeration or treatment plants, 7. governmental facilities (except for those Permitted Uses identified in Section 2.01.03 of the Land Development Code), 8. public water supply acquisition, withdrawal, or extraction facilities, and 9. public safety service facilities, and other similar facilities. b. Neighborhood Center Transitional Conditional Use Provisions: Conditional uses shall be allowed immediately adjacent to designated Neighborhood Centers subject to the following criteria: 1. Properties eligible for conditional uses shall abut the arterial or collector road serving the Neighborhood Center, 2. Such uses shall be limited to transitional conditional uses that are compatible with both residential and commercial such as neighborhood churches, social or fraternal organizations, childcare centers, schools, and group care facilities, 3. All conditional uses shall make provisions for shared parking arrangements with adjoining developments whenever possible, 4. Conditional uses abutting Estates zoned property shall provide, at a minimum, a 75-foot buffer of native vegetation in which no parking or water management uses are permitted, 5. Conditional uses adjoining the commercial uses within Neighborhood Centers shall, whenever possible, share parking areas, access and curb cuts with the adjoining commercial use, in order to facilitate traffic movement. c. Transitional Conditional Uses: Conditional uses may be granted in Transitional Areas. A Transitional Area is defined as an area located between existing non-residential and residential areas. The purpose of this provision is to allow conditional uses in areas that are adjacent to existing non-residential uses and are therefore generally not appropriate for residential use. The conditional use will act as a buffer between non-residential and residential areas. The following criteria shall apply for Transitional Conditional Use requests: 1. Site shall be directly adjacent to a non-residential use (zoned or developed); 2. Site shall be 2.25 acres, or more, in size or be at least 150 feet in width and shall not exceed 5 acres; 3. Site abutting Estates zoned property without an approved conditional use shall provide, at a minimum, a 75-foot buffer of native vegetation in which no parking or water management uses are permitted; 4. Site shall not be adjacent to a church, neighborhood church or other place of worship, school, social or fraternal organization, child care center, convalescent home, hospice, rest home, home for the aged, adult foster home, children's home, rehabilitation centers; 5. Site shall not be adjacent to parks or open space and recreational uses; and Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 18 of 43 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 416 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element 16 Words underlined are added; words stuck through are deleted. 6. Site shall not be adjacent to permitted (by right) Essential Service uses, as identified in Section 2.01.03 of the Land Development Code, except may be located adjacent to libraries and museums. e. Special Exceptions to Conditional Use Locational Criteria: 1. Temporary use (TU) permits for model homes, as defined in the Collier County Land Development Code, may be allowed anywhere within the Estates-Mixed Use District. Conditional use permits for the purpose of extending the time period for use of the structure as a model home shall be required, and shall be subject to the provisions of Section 5.04.04B. and C. of the Collier County Land Development Code, Ordinance No. 04-41, as amended. Such conditional uses shall not be subject to the locational criteria of the Conditional Uses Subdistrict, and may be allowed anywhere within the Estates-Mixed Use District. 2. Conditional Use permits for excavation, as provided for in the Estates zoning district, are not subject to the locational criteria for Conditional Uses and may be allowed anywhere within the Estates-Mixed Use District. 3. Conditional Use for a cellular tower is be allowed in the Estates Zoning District only on parcels no smaller than 2.25 acres and adjacent to a roadway classified within the Transportation Element as a Collector or Arterial. 4. Mission Subdistrict The Mission Subdistrict is located on the south side of Oil Well Road, approximately one-quarter mile west of Everglades Boulevard, and consists of 21.72 acres. The purpose of this Subdistrict is to provide for churches and related uses, including community outreach. The following uses are allowed: a. Churches. b. Child care centers – must be not-for-profit and affiliated with a church within the Subdistrict. c. Private schools – must be not-for-profit and affiliated with a church within the Subdistrict. d. Individual and family social services (activity centers, elderly or handicapped only; day care centers, adult and handicapped only) – must be not-for-profit and affiliated with a church within the Subdistrict. e. Medical outreach to the community, to include activities such as administering influenza vaccine, checking blood pressure, and conducting blood donation drives must be not-for-profit and affiliated with a church within the Subdistrict. f. Soup kitchens and homeless shelters are prohibited in this Subdistrict. g. The maximum total floor area allowed in this Subdistrict is 90,000 square feet. The maximum height of buildings shall be 30 feet zoned height, except the worship center shall be permitted a zoned height of 35 feet. Development in this Subdistrict shall be designed to be compatible with the existing, and allowed future, development in the surrounding area. In the alternate to the foregoing uses, measures of development intensity, and development standards, this Subdistrict may be developed with single family dwellings in accordance with the Residential Estates Subdistrict. Property adjacent to this Subdistrict shall not qualify for the Transitional Conditional Use. Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 19 of 43 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 417 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element 17 Words underlined are added; words stuck through are deleted. 5. Everglades – Randall Subdistrict The Everglades – Randall Subdistrict is located on the northeast corner of Everglades Boulevard and Randall Boulevard, consists of 7.8 acres, and comprises Tract 115 and the east 150 feet of Tract 116, Unit 69, Golden Gate Estates. The purpose of this Subdistrict is to provide for churches and other places of worship and their related uses. The following use is permitted within the Subdistrict through the conditional use process: a. Churches and other places of worship The following church-related uses are prohibited within the Subdistrict: a. Day care centers b. Private schools c. Soup kitchens d. Homeless shelters The maximum total floor area allowed in this Subdistrict is 20,000 square feet, including no more than 230 seats. The maximum height of buildings shall be 30 feet. Architectural features such as steeples may be a maximum height of 60 feet. For access drives, a throat depth of no less than 30 feet, measured from the roadway edge of the pavement, shall be provided. B. Estates – Commercial District 1. Randall Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict The Randall Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict, containing approximately 56.5 acres, is located on the south side of Randall Boulevard and Immokalee Road (CR-846), extending from 8th Street NE west to the Corkscrew Canal. This Subdistrict is comprised of the following properties: Tracts 54, 55, 71, 72, 89, 90, 107, 108, 125, 126 and 127, Golden Gate Estates, Unit 23. This Subdistrict has been designated on the Golden Gate Area Future Land Use Map and the Randall Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict Map. It is the intent of this Subdistrict to provide commercial goods and services to the surrounding area. All development in the Subdistrict shall comply with the following requirements and limitations: a. All development is encouraged to be in the form of a PUD. b. Projects directly abutting Estates zoned property shall provide, at a minimum, a 75-foot wide buffer of retained native vegetation in which no parking or water management uses are permitted; except that, when abutting conditional uses no such buffer is required. c. Shared parking shall be required with adjoining development whenever possible. d. Tract 55 shall only be utilized for native preservation and water management areas. e. The eastern boundary of Tract 55 shall contain, at a minimum, a 50-foot wide retained native vegetation buffer. f. The following limitation shall apply to Tract 71 only: 1. Limitation of Uses – Uses shall be limited to the following: Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 20 of 43 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 418 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element 18 Words underlined are added; words stuck through are deleted. a. Automobile Service Station; b. Barber & Beauty Shops; c. Convenience Stores; d. Drug Stores; e. Food Markets; f. Hardware Stores; g. Laundries – Self Service Only; h. Parks, Public or Private; i. Post Offices and Professional Offices; j. Repair Shops – Radio, TV, Small Appliances and Shoes; k. Restaurants, including fast food restaurants but not drive in restaurants; l. All Permitted Uses of the C-2, Convenience Commercial, zoning district in the Collier County Land Development Code, Ordinance No. 04-41, as amended as of April 14. 2009; and, m. Veterinary Clinic with no outside kenneling; g. The following limitations shall apply to Tracts 72, 89, 90, 107, 108, 125, 126, 127, and Tract 54: 1. Development intensity on Tracts 72, 89, 90, 107, 108, 125, 126, 127 and the west one-half of Tract 54 shall be limited to 360,950 square feet of floor area, of which no more than 285,950 square feet shall be retail development. 2. Development intensity on the east one-half of Tract 54 shall be limited to 20,000 square feet of commercial development. 3. The first phase of the project development, exclusive of the existing 20,000 sq. ft. of development on the east one-half of Tract 54, shall include a grocery anchor, with a minimum of 35,000 square feet of gross leasable floor area, prior to any certificates of occupancy being issued beyond 100,000 square feet of commercial development. 4. Allowable uses shall be limited to the permitted and conditional uses of the C- 4, General Commercial District in the Collier County Land Development Code in effect as of the effective date of the adoption of the amendment of this Subdistrict [Ordinance No. 2010 -32, adopted July 28, 2010], except that the following uses, as identified with a number from the Standard Industrial Classification Manual, shall be prohibited: a. Tire Dealers, Automotive Retail (Group 5531) b. Automotive Parking (Group 7521) c. Communication Services (Group 4899) d. Drinking Places (Group 5813) e. Fishing Piers (Group 7999) f. Glass and Glazing work (Group 1793) g. Health Services (Groups 8059 - 8069) h. Specialty Outpatient Facilities (Group 8093) i. Houseboat Rental, Lakes Operations, Party and Pleasure Boat rental (Group 7999) j. Large Appliance repair service (Group 7623) k. Marinas (Group 4493 and 4499) l. Miscellaneous Repair Services (Groups 7622-7641, 7699) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 21 of 43 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 419 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element 19 Words underlined are added; words stuck through are deleted. m. Liquor Store, unless operated by a Grocery Retailer (Group 5921) n. Used Merchandise Store (Group 5932) o. Automatic Merchandising Machine Operators (Group 5962) p. Direct Selling Establishment (Group 5963) q. Escort Services, Massage Parlors, Tattoo Parlors, Turkish Baths, Wedding Chapels (Group 7299) r. Betting Information Services, Bath Houses, Billiard Parlors, Bookies and Bookmakers, Cable lifts, Carnival Operation, Circus Companies, Fortune Tellers, Go-cart racing operation, Off-track betting, Ping Pong Parlors, Rodeo Animal Rentals, Rodeos, Shooting Ranges, Trapshooting Facilities (Group 7999) s. Parole offices, Probation offices, Public welfare centers, refugee services, settlement houses (Group 8322) t. Tow-in parking lots (Groups 7514, 7515, 7521) u. Animal Specialty Services (Group 0752) 5. At time of rezoning, consideration shall be given to imposing appropriate restrictions on the amount of development allowed in this Subdistrict prior to discontinuance and relocation of the Big Corkscrew Island Fire Station and Florida Division of Forestry fire tower uses. 6. All buildings on Tracts 72, 89, 90, 107, 108, 125, 126 and 127 shall be developed with a unified architectural theme. 7. Excluding the commercial zoning on Tract 71 and the existing approved commercial zoning on the east one-half of Tract 54, any additional development in the Subdistrict shall be developed in phases. Phase I shall be limited to 100,000 square feet of gross leasable floor area. Subsequent phases shall not receive building permits until the Randall Boulevard/Immokalee Road intersection project, including the widening of the segment of Randall Boulevard abutting the Subdistrict, as shown on Exhibit “A” of the Developer Contribution Agreement adopted July 28, 2010 by the Board of County Commissioners, has commenced. No Certificates of Occupancy shall be issued for subsequent development phases until the Randall Boulevard/Immokalee Road intersection project is substantially complete. Neither the building permits limitations nor the Certificates of Occupancy limitations shall apply if satisfactory alternative mitigation is approved by the Board of County Commissioners pursuant to Transportation Element Policy 5.1, or if traffic conditions change in such a manner that adequate capacity is available. 2. Estates Shopping Center Subdistrict Recognizing the need to provide for centrally located basic goods and services within a portion Northern Golden Gate Estates, the Estates Shopping Center Subdistrict has been designated on the Golden Gate Area Future Land Use Map. The Subdistrict is located at the NW corner of Golden Gate Boulevard and Wilson Boulevard westward to 3rd Street NW and extending northward to include the southern 180 feet of Tracts 142 and 106 of Unit 11 and the southern 255 feet of Tract 111 of Unit 11 of Golden Gate Estates, totaling approximately 41 acres. Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 22 of 43 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 420 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element 20 Words underlined are added; words stuck through are deleted. The Estates Shopping Center Subdistrict is intended to provide convenient shopping, personal services and employment for the central areas of Northern Golden Gate Estates. Commercial development in this Subdistrict will reduce driving distances for many residents, assist in minimizing the road network required, and reduce traffic impacts in this area of Collier County. All development in this Subdistrict shall comply with the following requirements and limitations: a. Allowable Uses, as identified with a number from the Standard Industrial Classification Manual, shall be limited to the following: 1. Amusement and recreation Groups 7911 – Dance studios, schools and halls, excluding discotheques 7991 – Physical fitness facilities 7999 – Amusement and recreation services, not elsewhere classified, allowing only day camps, gymnastics instruction, judo/karate instruction, sporting goods rental and yoga instruction 2. Apparel and accessory stores (no adult oriented sales) Groups 5611 – Men’s and boys’ clothing and accessory stores 5621 – Women’s clothing stores 5632 – Women’s accessory and specialty stores 5641 – Children’s and infants’ wear stores 5651 – Family clothing stores 5661 – Shoe stores 5699 – Miscellaneous apparel and accessory stores 3. Automotive dealers and gasoline service stations Groups 5531 – Auto and home supply stores 4. Automotive repair, services and parking (No outdoor repair/service. All repairs/services to be performed by authorized automotive technician.) Groups 7514 – Passenger car rental 5. Building materials, hardware, garden supply, and mobile home dealers Groups 5231 – Paint, glass, and wallpaper stores 5251 – Hardware stores 5261 – Retail nurseries, lawn and garden supply stores 6. Business services Groups 7334 – Photocopying and duplicating services 7335 – Commercial photography 7336 – Commercial art and graphic design 7338 – Secretarial and court reporting services 7342 – Disinfecting and pest control services 7352 – Medical equipment rental and leasing 7359 – Equipment rental and leasing, not elsewhere classified, excluding the following uses: airplane rental and leasing; coin operated machine rental and leasing; industrial truck rental and leasing; oil field equipment rental and leasing; oil well drilling equipment rental; leasing; toilets, portable – rental and leasing; and vending machines – rental only Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 23 of 43 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 421 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element 21 Words underlined are added; words stuck through are deleted. 7371 – Computer programming services 7372 – Prepackaged software 7373 – Computer integrated systems design 7374 – Computer processing and data preparation and processing services 7375 – Information retrieval services 7376 – Computer facilities management services 7379 – Computer related services, not elsewhere classified 7382 – Security systems services 7383 – News syndicates 7384 – Photofinishing laboratories 7389 – Business services, not elsewhere classified 7. Communications Groups 4812 – Radiotelephone communications 4841 – Cable and other pay television services 8. Construction, special trade contractors (office use only, no on-site materials or equipment storage) Groups 1711 – Plumbing, heating and air-conditioning 1721 – Painting and paper hanging industry 1731 – Electrical work industry 1741 – Masonry, stone setting, and other stone work 1742 – Plastering, drywall, acoustical, and insulation work 1743 – Terrazzo, tile, marble, and mosaic work industry 1751 – Carpentry work 1752 – Floor laying and other floor work, not elsewhere classified industry 1761 – Roofing, siding, and sheet metal work industry 1771 – Concrete work industry 1781 – Water well drilling industry 1791 – Structural steel erection 1793 – Glass and glazing work 1794 – Excavation work 1795 – Wrecking and demolition work 1796 – Installation or erection of building equipment, not elsewhere 1799 – Special trade contractors, not elsewhere classified 9. Depository institutions Groups 6021 – National commercial banks 6022 – State commercial banks 6029 – Commercial banks, not elsewhere classified 6035 – Savings institutions, federally chartered 6036 – Savings Institutions, not federally chartered 6061 – Credit unions, federally chartered 6062 – Credit unions, not federally chartered 6091 – Non-deposit trust facilities Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 24 of 43 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 422 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element 22 Words underlined are added; words stuck through are deleted. 6099 – Functions related to depository banking, not elsewhere classified 10. Eating and drinking places (Group 5812, including only liquor service accessory to the restaurant use, no outdoor music or televisions, and no windows or walls open to the outside, except as required by code) 11. Engineering, accounting, research, management, and related services Groups 8711 – Engineering services 8712 – Architectural services 8713 – Surveying services 8721 – Accounting, auditing, and bookkeeping services 8741 – Management services 8742 – Management consulting services 8743 – Public relations services 8748 – Business consulting services, not elsewhere classified 12. Executive, legislative, and general government, except finance Groups 9111 – Executive offices 9121 – Legislative bodies 9131 – Executive and legislative offices combined 9199 – General government, not elsewhere classified 13. Food stores Groups 5411 – Grocery stores (minimum 27,000 square feet) 5421 – Meat and fish (seafood) markets, including freezer provisioners 5431 – Fruit and vegetable markets 5441 – Candy, nut, and confectionery stores 5451 – Dairy products stores 5461 – Retail bakeries 5499 – Miscellaneous food stores, including convenience stores with fuel pumps and carwash 14. General merchandise stores Groups 5311 – Department stores 5331 – Variety stores 5399 – Miscellaneous general merchandise stores 15. Home furniture, furnishings, and equipment stores Groups 5712 – Furniture stores 5713 – Floor covering stores 5714 – Drapery, curtain, and upholstery stores 5719 – Miscellaneous home furnishings stores 5722 – Household appliance stores 5731 – Radio, television, and consumer electronics stores 5734 – Computer and computer software stores 5735 – Record and prerecorded tape stores (no adult oriented sales) 5736 – Musical instrument store Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 25 of 43 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 423 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element 23 Words underlined are added; words stuck through are deleted. 16. Insurance carriers Groups 6311 – Life insurance 6321 – Accident and health insurance 6324 – Hospital and medical service plans 6331 – Fire, marine, and casualty insurance 6351 – Surety insurance 6361 – Title insurance 6371 – Pension, health and welfare funds 6399 – Insurance carriers, not elsewhere classified 6411 – Insurance agents 17. Justice, public order and safety Groups 9221 – Police protection 9222 – Legal counsel and prosecution 9229 – Public order and safety, not elsewhere classified 18. Meeting and banquet rooms 19. Miscellaneous retail (no adult oriented sales) Groups 5912 – Drug stores and proprietary stores 5921 – Liquor stores (accessory to grocery or pharmacy only) 5932 – Used merchandise stores 5941 – Sporting goods stores and bicycle shops 5942 – Book stores 5943 – Stationery stores 5944 – Jewelry stores, including repair 5945 – Hobby, toy, and game shops 5946 – Camera and photographic supply stores 5947 – Gift, novelty, and souvenir shops 5948 – Luggage and leather goods stores 5949 – Sewing, needlework, and piece goods stores 5992 – Florists 5993 – Tobacco stores and stands 5994 – News dealers and newsstands 5995 – Optical goods stores 5999 – Miscellaneous retail stores, not elsewhere classified (excluding gravestone, tombstones, auction rooms, monuments, swimming pools, and sales barns) 20. Non-depository credit institutions Groups 6111 – Federal and federally-sponsored credit agencies 6141 – Personal credit institutions 6153 – Short-term business credit institutions, except agricultural 6159 – Miscellaneous business credit institutions 6162 – Mortgage bankers and loan correspondents 6163 – Loan brokers 21. Offices and clinics of dentist (Group 8021) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 26 of 43 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 424 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element 24 Words underlined are added; words stuck through are deleted. 22. Personal services Groups 7212 – Garment pressing, and agents for laundries and drycleaners 7221 – Photographic studios, portrait 7231 – Beauty shops 7241 – Barber shops 7251 – Shoe repair shops and shoeshine parlors 7291 – Tax return preparation services 7299 – Miscellaneous personal services, not elsewhere classified, excluding massage parlors, Turkish baths and escort services 23. Public finance, taxation, and monetary policy (Group 9311) 24. Real Estate Groups 6512 – Operators of nonresidential buildings 6513 – Operators of apartment buildings 6514 – Operators of dwellings other than apartment buildings 6515 – Operators of residential mobile home sites 6517 – Lessors of railroad property 6519 – Lessors of real property, not elsewhere classified 6531 – Real estate agents and managers 6541 – Title abstract offices 6552 – Land subdividers and developers, except cemeteries 25. Schools and educational services, not elsewhere classified (Group 8299) 26. Security and commodity brokers, dealers, exchanges, and services Groups 6211 – Security brokers, dealers, and flotation companies 6221 – Commodity contracts brokers and dealers 6231 – Security and commodity exchanges 6282 – Investment advice 6289 – Services allied with the exchange of securities or commodities, not elsewhere classified 27. Social services Groups 8322 – Individual and family social services (adult day care centers only) 8351 – Child day care services 28. Travel agencies (Group 4724) 29. Veterinary services for animal specialties (Group 0742, excluding outside kenneling) 30. Video tape rental (Group 7841, excluding adult oriented sales and rentals) 31. United states postal service (Group 4311, excluding major distribution centers) 32. Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals (“BZA”) by the process outlined in the LDC. b. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including, but not limited to: Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 27 of 43 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 425 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element 25 Words underlined are added; words stuck through are deleted. 1. Utility buildings (including water and wastewater plants) which shall be enclosed 2. Essential service facilities 3. Gazebos, statuary and other architectural features 4. Utilities, water and wastewater facilities and/or plants (all processing plants must be enclosed) 5. Alcohol service for outdoor dining shall only be accessory to food service c. Operational Standards 1. Outdoor music is prohibited d. The following uses, as identified with a number from the Standard Industrial Classification Manual, shall be prohibited: 1. Amusement and recreation services, not elsewhere classified (Group 7999, except those uses expressly listed above in a.1 are permitted) 2. Air and water resource and solid waste management (Group 9511) 3. Business Services Groups 7313 – Radio, television, and publishers’ advertising representatives 7331 – Direct mail advertising services 4. Correctional Institutions (Group 9223) 5. Drinking places (alcoholic beverages) (Group 5813) 6. Educational services Groups 8211 – Elementary and secondary schools 8221 – Colleges, universities, and professional schools 8222 – Junior colleges and technical institutes 8231 – Libraries 7. Health services Groups 8062 – General medical and surgical hospitals 8063 – Psychiatric hospitals 8069 – Specialty hospitals, except psychiatric 8. Miscellaneous Retail Groups 5921 – Liquor stores 5961 – Catalog and mail-order houses 5962 – Automatic merchandising machine operators 9. Personal services Groups 7211 – Power Laundries, family and commercial 7261 – Funeral service and crematories 10. Social services Groups 8322 – Individual and family social services, excluding adult day care centers 8361 – Residential care, including soup kitchens and homeless shelters e. Development intensity shall be limited to 190,000 square feet of gross leasable floor area. f. No commercial use shall exceed fifteen thousand (15,000) square feet, except for a single grocery store use between twenty-seven thousand (27,000) and sixty Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 28 of 43 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 426 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element 26 Words underlined are added; words stuck through are deleted. thousand (60,000) square feet in size, a single commercial use of up to thirty thousand (30,000) square feet in size, and a single commercial use of up to twenty thousand (20,000) square feet in size. g. No building may exceed 30,000 square feet in size, except for the grocery anchored building with inline stores. h. Development within this Subdistrict shall be phased and the following commitments related to area roadway improvements shall be completed within the specified timeframes: 1. Right-of-Way for Golden Gate Boulevard Expansion and Right-of-Way for the Wilson Boulevard Expansion will be donated to the County at no cost within 120 days of a written request from the County. 2. The owner will pay its fair share for the intersection improvements at Wilson Boulevard and Golden Gate Boulevard within 90 days of County request for reimbursement. 3. Until the intersection improvements at Golden Gate Boulevard and Wilson Boulevard are complete, the County shall not issue a Certificate(s) of Occupancy (CO) for more than 100,000 square feet of development. The applicant must obtain a C.O. for a grocery store as part of this 100,000 square feet, and the grocery store must be the first C.O. obtained. i. Rezoning is encouraged to be in the form of a Planned Unit Development (PUD), and the rezone ordinance must contain development standards to ensure that all commercial land uses will be compatible with neighboring residential uses. This subdistrict includes a conceptual plan, which identifies the location of the permitted development area and required preserve area for this subdistrict. The preserve area depicted on the conceptual plan shall satisfy all comprehensive plan requirements for retained native vegetation, including but not limited to the requirements of Policy 6.1.1 of the CCME. A more detailed development plan must be developed and utilized for the required PUD rezoning. j. Development standards, including permitted uses and setbacks for principal buildings shall be established at the time of PUD rezoning. Any future PUD rezone shall include at a minimum: 1. Landscape buffers adjacent to external rights-of-way shall be: a. 1st/3rd Streets ‒ Minimum 30’ wide enhanced buffer b. Wilson Boulevard ‒ Minimum 25’ wide enhanced buffer c. Golden Gate Boulevard ‒ Minimum 50’ wide enhanced buffer 2. Except for the utility building, no commercial building may be constructed within 125 feet of the northern property boundary and within 300’ of the 3rd Street NW boundary of this subdistrict. 3. Any portion of the Project directly abutting residential property (property zoned E-Estates and without an approved conditional use) shall provide, at a minimum, a seventy-five (75) feet wide buffer, except the westernmost 330’ of Tract 106, which shall provide a minimum 20’ wide buffer in which no parking uses are permitted. Twenty-five (25) feet of the width of the buffer along the developed area shall be a landscape buffer. A minimum of fifty (50) feet of Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 29 of 43 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 427 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element 27 Words underlined are added; words stuck through are deleted. the buffer width shall consist of retained or re-planted native vegetation and must be consistent with subsection 3.05.07.H of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC). The native vegetation retention area may consist of a perimeter berm and be used for water management detention. Any newly constructed berm shall be revegetated to meet subsection 3.05.07.H of the LDC (native vegetation replanting requirements). Additionally, in order to be considered for approval, use of the native vegetation retention area for water management purposes shall meet the following criteria: a. There shall be no adverse impacts to the native vegetation being retained. The additional water directed to this area shall not increase the annual hydro-period unless it is proven that such would have no adverse impact to the existing vegetation. b. If the project requires permitting by the South Florida Water Management District, the project shall provide a letter or official document from the District indicating that the native vegetation within the retention area will not have to be removed to comply with water management requirements. If the District cannot or will not supply such a letter, then the native vegetation retention area shall not be used for water management. c. If the project is reviewed by Collier County, the developer’s engineer shall provide evidence that no removal of native vegetation is necessary to facilitate the necessary storage of water in the water management area. 2. AGRICULTURAL/RURAL DESIGNATION A. Rural Settlement Area District This area consists of Sections 13, 14, 23 and 24, and a portion of 22, Township 48 South, Range 27 East (the former North Golden Gate Subdivision), which was zoned and platted between 1967 and 1970. In settlement of a lawsuit pertaining to the permitted uses of this property, this property has been “vested” for the types of land uses specified in that certain “PUD” by Settlement Zoning granted by the County as referenced in that certain SETTLEMENT AND ZONING AGREEMENT dated the 27th day of January 1986. Twenty-one hundred (2,100) dwelling units and twenty-two (22) acres of neighborhood commercial uses and hotel/motel use are “vested”. This area is now comprised of the Orange Tree PUD and Orange Blossom Ranch PUD, and the types of uses permitted in this District include residential, earth mining, commercial, agricultural, community facility, community uses, education facilities, religious facilities, golf course, open space and recreational uses, and essential service uses. By designation in the Growth Management Plan and the Golden Gate Area Master Plan as Settlement Area, the Plan recognizes the property as an area which, while outside of the Urban Designation, is appropriate for the following types of uses: residential, earth mining, commercial, agricultural, community facility, community uses, education facilities, religious facilities, golf course, open space and recreational, and essential services. Future zoning changes to add dwelling units or commercial acreage within the geographic boundaries of this District will not be prohibited or discouraged by reason of the above-referenced vested status. The geographic expansion of the Settlement Area to additional lands outside the areas covered by Sections 13, 14, 23 and 24, and a portion of 22, Township 48 South, Range 27 East (the former North Golden Gate Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 30 of 43 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 428 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element 28 Words underlined are added; words stuck through are deleted. Subdivision), shall be prohibited. The Settlement Area Land Use District is limited to the area described above and shall not be available as a land use district for any other property in the County. 3. OVERLAYS AND SPECIAL FEATURES A. Southern Golden Gate Estates Natural Resource Protection Overlay Southern Golden Gate Estates is identified as a Natural Resource Protection Area (NRPA) Overlay on the Golden Gate Area Future Land Use Map and is subject to the NRPA Overlay provisions of the FLUE. [REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 31 of 43 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 429 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element 29 Words underlined are added; words stuck through are deleted. C. List of Maps Golden Gate Area Future Land Use Map Golden Gate Estates Neighborhood Centers Wilson Boulevard/Golden Gate Boulevard Center Golden Gate Boulevard/Everglades Boulevard Center Immokalee Road/Everglades Boulevard Center Randall Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict Mission Subdistrict Estates Shopping Center Subdistrict Estates Shopping Center Subdistrict Conceptual Plan Everglades – Randall Subdistrict Immokalee Road/Randall Boulevard Planning Study Area Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 32 of 43 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 430 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) COLLIER BLVDCOLLIER BLVDT A M I A M I T R L E INTERSTATE 75 INTERSTATE 75I-75I-75RANDALL BLVD C.R. 951IMMOKALEE RD C.R. 951S.R. 84 EVERGLADES BLVD SDESOTO BLVD SIMMOKALEE RD OIL WELL RD COLLIER BLVDLIVINGSTON RDDAVIS BLVD PINE RIDGE RD EVERGLADES BLVD NRADIO RD G.G. PKWY DESOTO BLVD SLOGAN BLVD NSANTA BARBARA BLVDDESOTO BLVD NVANDERBILT BEACH RD GOLDEN GATE BLVD EVERGLADES BLVD SGOLDEN GATE BLVD GREEN BLVD RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK RD WILSON BLVD COUNTY BARN RDURBAN DESIGNATION THIS MAP CAN NOT BE INTERPRETED WITHOUT THE GOALS, OBJECTIVES, POLICIES AND LAND USE DESIGNATION DESCRIPTION SECTION OF THE GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN. NOTE : MIXED USE DISTRICT Urban Residential Subdistrict Downtown Center Commercial Subdistrict ESTATES DESIGNATION MIXED USE DISTRICT Residential Estates Subdistrict Conditional Uses Subdistrict T 51 ST 50 ST 49 ST 48 ST 47 S R 26 E R 27 E R 28 E R 29 E GOLDEN GATEFUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDED - JANUARY 25, 2005 (ORD. NO. 2005-3) AMENDED - DECEMBER 4, 2007 (ORD. NO. 2007-77) AMENDED - OCTOBER 14, 2008 (ORD. NO. 2008-59) AMENDED - JULY 28, 2010 (ORD. NO. 2010-31) AMENDED - JULY 28, 2010 (ORD. NO. 2010-32) AMENDED - NOVEMBER 18, 2014 (ORD. NO. 2014-41) AMENDED - SEPTEMBER 14, 2011 (ORD. NO. 2011-29) AMENDED - NOVEMBER 10, 2015 (ORD. NO. 2015-62) ADOPTED -FEBRARY, 1991 AMENDED - MAY 19, 1992 AMENDED - MAY 25, 1993 AMENDED - JULY 27, 1993 AMENDED - APRIL 12, 1994 AMENDED - MARCH 14, 1995 AMENDED - OCTOBER 27, 1997 AMENDED - APRIL 14, 1998 AMENDED - SEPTEMBER 8, 1998 AMENDED - FEBRUARY 23, 1999 AMENDED - MAY 9, 2000 AMENDED - MARCH 13, 2001 AMENDED - MAY 14, 2002 AMENDED - SEPTEMBER 10, 2003 (ORD. NO. 2003-44) AMENDED - OCTOBER 26, 2004 (ORD. NO. 2004-71) AMENDED - JANUARY 25, 2007 (ORD. NO. 2007-19) AMENDED - JUNE 13,2017 (ORD. NO. 2017-23) GOLDEN GATE AREAFUTURE LAND USE MAP 0 1 2 30.5 Miles PREPARED BY: GIS/MAPPING SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPT. DATE: 05/2018 FILE: PL20180000261-CPSP-2018-2 GGFLU DRAFT.MXD ° SUBJECT SITE (ADDITIONS)CPSP-2018-2 DRAFT AMENDED - XXXXX (ORD. NO. XXXX) AMENDED - MAY 10, 2016 (ORD. NO. 2016-12) High Density Residential Subdistrict Mixed Use Activity Center Subdistrict Golden Gate Urban Commercial Infill Subdistrict Santa Barbara Commercial Subdistrict COMMERCIAL DISTRICT Conditional Use Subdistrict: Golden Gate Parkway Special Provisions Neighborhood Center Subdistrict Golden Gate Parkway Institional Subdistrict Mission Subdistrict Everglades-Randall Subdistrict Special Exceptions to Conditional Use Locational Criteria AGRICULTURAL / RURAL DESIGNATION Southern Golden Gate Estates Natural Resource Protection Area Overlay OVERLAYS AND SPECIAL FEATURES Rural Settlement Area District Residential Density Bands Interchange Activity Center Subdistrict (As Described in the Future Land Use Element in the GMP) Commercial Western Estates Infill Subdistrict Pine Ridge Road Mixed Use Subdistrict Randall Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict Estates Shopping Center Subdistrict Southbrooke Office Subdistrict Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict COMMERCIAL DISTRICTCollier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 33 of 43 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 431 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 34 of 43 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 432 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 35 of 43 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 433 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 36 of 43 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 434 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 37 of 43 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 435 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) RANDALL BOULEVARD COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 38 of 43 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 436 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) EVERGLADES BOULEVARDOIL WELL ROAD C.R. 858IMMOKALEE ROAD C.R. 846WILSON BOULEVARDRANDALL BOULEVARD SUBDISTRICT MISSION Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 39 of 43 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 437 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 40 of 43 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 438 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft AmendmentsGolden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-24/29/19Page 41 of 439.A.3.dPacket Pg. 439Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Staff Proposed Draft AmendmentsGolden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-24/29/19Page 42 of 439.A.3.dPacket Pg. 440Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) WILSON BLVDWILSON BLVDOIL WELL RD RANDALL BLVDIMMOKALEE RD4th ST NW2nd ST NW35th AVE NW 37th AVE NW 20th AVE NW 25th AVE NE Chesapeake Bay CT Ocean Bluff CT 20th AVE NE 35th AVE NE 24th AVE NE 37th AVE NE 20th AVE NE4th ST NE33rd AVE NE 2nd ST NERandall Blvd Commercial Subdistrict IMM O K A L E E R D Orange Tree IMMOKALEE ROAD/RANDALL BLVD PLANNING STUDY AREA PREPARED BY: BETH YANG, AICP GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT FILE: Imm Randal Study Area.mxd DATE: 02/2019 0 1,000 2,000 3,000500Feet ADOPTED - XXXXX, 2019 (Ord. No. XXXX-XX) LEGEND IMMOKALEE RD/RANDALL BLVD PLANNING STUDY AREA RESIDENTIAL ESTATES SUBDISTRICT RANDALL BLVD COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT RURAL SETTLEMENT AREA SUBDISTRICT ¯ Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 43 of 43 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 441 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 442 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 443 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 444 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Words underlined are added; words struck-through are deleted. Row of asterisks (**** **** ****) denotes break in text. Future Land Use Element (Adopted October 1997, amended through December 12, 2017 by Ordinance no. 2017-48) FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION DESCRIPTION SECTION [pg. 25] *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** URBAN DESIGNATION [pg. 25] *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** C. Urban Commercial District [pg. 54] *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** 1. Mixed Use Activity Center Subdistrict [pg. 54] *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** Allowable land uses in Mixed Use Activity Centers include the full array of commercial [pg. 55] uses, residential uses, institutional uses, hotel/motel uses at a maximum density of 26 units per acre, community facilities, and other land uses as generally allowed in the Urban designation. Mixed Use Activity Center #15, in Golden Gate City, shall also allow the additional uses identified in the Golden Gate Area Master Plan. The actual mix of the various land uses shall be determined during the rezoning pr ocess based on consideration of the factors listed below. Except as restricted below under the provision for Master Planned Activity Centers, all Mixed Use Activity Centers may be developed with any of the land uses allowed within this Subdistrict. Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 1 of 3 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 445 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft AmendmentsGolden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-24/29/19Page 2 of 39.A.3.d Packet Pg. 446 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) À8 À12 À12 À13 À11À24À6À13À14 À31À28 À1À1À5 À7À11À12À12À8À9 À10 À5 À22À17À3 À11 À14 À6À3 À9À15 À3À4À5À13À25À6À7À10À4À5 À22À11 À13À16À14 À8À8À10À11À7À9 À15À17À16À18À19À21À22À20À23À24À17À15 À16 À10À11À27À4À7À3À11À14À17 À10À15À15À10 À10À10 À29À30À4À4 À9 À11 À12À3À6À6 À24À2 À12À18À21 À6 À18 À16À13À10 À17À10À15À29À14 À12À15 À14À13 À9 À18À16 À10À16À9À9À16 À5 À12À15À2À1À8 À8À7À6À9À5À4À3À2À9À1 À12 À13À14À19À12À5À30À4À1À15À11À9À20À16À9À13 À11 À3 À3 À13À11À1 À7 À10À9À3À16À4 À25À19 À10 À12À9À8À7À4À6À5 À9À21À21À32 À18À17À8À19 À3À1À2À20À13 À31À14 À10 À1 À20À14À17À2À21À6 À8 À19À12À17À15À8À17À17À8À8 À8 À10À22À22À3À22 À2 À31À2 À14 À8 À18À22 À23À1À15À18À7À7À11 À18À11 À20À16À18À7À18À7À7À7 À24À5À19À23À2À20 À9À25À25À19À6À7À19À6À8À18 À32À1 À11À1À15 À7À5À6À26À12À1À4À4 À12À13À14À12À13 À15À14À10À11À15À7 À24À1À17 À3À1 À17À6À8À9À5 À16À18À20À19 À5À20 À27À17À5À18À18 À13À14 À1.1À15À17À16À18À19À21À22À20À23À24 À6 À19À17 À21À19À10 À2À25À13À3À2 À19 À6À6 À6 À21 À1À14À4À27À16À17À26À28 À21 À20À23À22À2À14À4À24À5 À18 À5 À22À20À9 À3 À25À12À10À17À19À26À27 À20À20À5 À3 À28 À29 À27À1À15À3À4 À5 À1 À14À4À15 À28 À2À16À17À18À19À21À22À26À20À25À23À24 À16 À28À2À1À9À29À1À20À16 À23À19À21À4À21À8À21À4À4À4 À5 À2 À30À8À11À13À15À1À7À1À24À3À20 À3 À30À17À6 À6À12 À7 À22À22À22À3À3 À13 À1À21À30À12À14À12À5À3 À31À18À4À4 À22 À21À15 À7À1À12À12À11À13À11À3 À13 À14À12À13À10À11À7À6À8À9À5 À31À19À22À32À11 À8À10 À1 À25À2À21À23À2 À12À1 À10 À12 À14À20À10 À6 À23À23À2 À2 À1À13 À33À9 À9À10À11À23À9 À11À33À21 À15À14À8À1À34À9À10 À22À5 À26 À1 À2À1 À10À8À22À15À34À15 À10À6À24 À1À24À1À24À24À1À1À16À17À18 À16À7À8À5À9 À19À21À22À26À20À25À23 À23 À11À16À14À7À10À35 À1 À24 À23À4 À6 À9À4 À17À13À8À24 À6À5À4 À7À3À1À2À24À3À10À9 À8À7À8À6À5À4À2À3 À7À25 À12À16À11À6À36 À1À15 À5 À8À12À3À25À1 À14À12À13À10À11À7À6À8À9 À17 À7 À18À12À6À5À13À11 À37À18À2 À7À26À13À2À17À10À6 À9À5 À26À4 À19À5À14À4À19 À21À10 À11À2À25 À1À3À14À27À16 À6 À12 À16 À26 À21 À18À20 À1À20 À5 À4À15À4 À20 À19À22À11À23 À17À12À13À1À15À14À16À17 À15À3À26À39À15À18 À19À20 À18À19À17À18À16.1À21 À16À22 À21 À5À5À4À16 À23À26À25 À15 À13À14 À14 À25 À3À19À22 À16 À21 À13 À2À40À6À13À24 À15À10À9 À7À4 À17 À28À13 À4À23À3À20 À5 À3À2À1À7À6À5À12 À12 À7 À4À17À23À1À22 À6À4À11À3À10À9À5À7À8À6À4 À3À41À21À2À11À3 À5 À6 À2 À1À14À8À1À22À13À12À22 À4À2À1À3 À10 À29 À18À18À22À28 À2 À28À29À30 À9 À23À21À9À15 À32 À31À33À34À1À1À36 À23 À2À17À1À11À10 À13À14 À8À9 À9À10À10À12À15 À20 À6 À19 À23À24À21À24À17 À8À17À16À11 À37À11À12À13À18 À16 À25À16À11À24À26À1À19 À19À20À21 À14 À7 À25 À10À7 À1À15À16À12À19À5 À40 À11 À13 À20À26À18À18À14 À12À10À9À8À7À41À6 À16À27À17À4 À4 À5 À4 À3À17À10 À15À9À17À13 À3À8À2À19A À9À8À7À6À5À4 À2 À19 À1À16À12À3À18À8À9 À14 À12 À26 À14 À15À11À2À14À14À19 À27À28À29À30À31À1À32À11 À5 À15 À20À2À10À17À10 À33À34 À19À22 À14À7À4 À1.1 À35À2À10À11À20À36 À37 À6 À1 À18À1À18À3À13À13 À22À21À21À9À13À10À20À19À11 À11 À19À16À13À13À21À14À20À23À21 À12 À18À13À17À14À15À16À18À17À20À19À16À38À15À22À9À14À5À13À12À23À7À2 17 1528 1 11322111617151015151010103042442918122211215131418161699169930331312519201491310875463132119171788171512812891011786514323122171412412012512111314151618171819720718131614201517181920162124222311187732115321971961195 196 211961710819141569121310116765 210 1718 161920212224232526 222020189552055 21421442121238194118119194212216222233202437322 2168 2323141529 212213 251011765223 MEADOWOOD CLUB193 1718 161920212224232526 APARTMENTS225126242411241 21 234 2122243 6453219 71087654231 814151312111089765 9252117 10198192211819202223 111117121315161417181920161718192116222024232526 121526141 13 NAPLES PARKWAY CONDO 12 151314109118115781216346574253121111098756542829303111632633344199351913638910121411131437131516171820910192111821238 3971 40 411642 1312111510987176148252627282918304311332GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY 3 33141910987654342SHOPPING CENTERTRACT A 12 843520ALLEY1362021137111213142115161718201910113813(PHASE 2)22 109200 2221201981218231716K MART201 98 15131424128313878914121211825911 34567615121314726TRACT A 8WINN10965841013161110910727DIXIE115411178122899014WACHOVIA431361871129BANK10SOUTHTRUST14ALLEY326191081530155 1712162031521520182148391331169TRACT A 1279116214411 19 182013173221221010322249568231838211792314242F O O D LIO N 22 81119 25522220212571187715182620TRACT C208 231219419PARKWAY PLAZA 1 61A L L E Y CLUB196 TRO PICANAA L L E Y 18 876REPLATCONDO527172426189641317352085352716 2021222324251621718215252012451421261428412826151716132720431TRACT B15 312419 2810273141529A L L E Y 1611 29416102248281121413153930205205178 3020013291211714ST. ELIZABETH SETON 31 621718622112301113125CHURCH & SCHOOL19 ALLEY732412 GOLDEN GATE TERRACE13113111123101191122220121381133ELEMENTARY SCHOOL101088321141192111101499342391033981522981581024982061079207162334815247106716911524814161135762476174113128252517128573655612181832613194137611237419526244414271722191410620385207154261816ALLEY33321120152716525442215192839322417141551620214324026123286132111329GOLDEN GATE MIDDLE SCHOOL 1726116 222221221733122712 44112493148721142112223818129232602310182111242024309246992591594262202117251919101761613101926162416911183202711207159182012172625161521519A1714816491424521 419 PARK EAST PLAZA CONDO13 8 32191852151410115141412319222207 18171761911219111420260102123131813ALLEY13324516491387211412 PARK EAST PLACE COM MERCIAL CONDO FIRE STATION #70 28TH PLACE S.W .ALLEY45TH46TH22ND PLACE S.W.22ND PLACE S.W.52ND LANE S.W.22ND PLACE S.W.53RD STREET S.W.52ND TERRACE S.W.23RD AVENUE S.W.SUNSHINEAVENUE S.W.23RD23RD AVENUE S.W.ALLEY51ST STREET S.W.50TH STREET S.W.50TH TERRACE S.W.51ST TERRACE S.W.23RD PLACE S.W.HUNTER49TH TERRACE S.W.23RD COURT S.W.23RD COURT S.W.45TH STREET S.W.GOLDEN G O L D E NROAD24TH AVENUE S.W.24TH AVENUE S.W.LUCERNEALLEYALLEYALLEY AL L E Y PLAC E 47TH ST. S.W.PKW YPARKWAY CORONADOCORONADO 2 4 T H A LLE Y S .W .S.W.G OLDEN G ATEA V E N U E PLACE25TH AVENUE S.W.52ND25TH53RD53RD2 5 T H S.W .S.W.PARKW AYC O U R T STREETPLACE4 7 T H T E R R A C E S .W.45TH ST. S.W.25TH 25THS.W.54THA V E N U E T E R R A C E S.W.2 6 T H T R O P I C A N A T E R R A C E 46TH4 7 T H26TH PLACE S.W.27TH AVENUE S.W .G ATE4 8 T H S.W.4 7 T HS T R E E T B OUL E V A RDS.W .26TH PLACE S.W .STREETAL L EYS.W.STREETTERRACETERRACE28TH AVENUE S.W .S.W .G OLDENTROPI CANA5 0 T HS.W .S.W.S.W.S.W. S T R E E T S.W.BOULEVARD27TH PLACE S.W .27 T HS.W .S.W.P LA C E 5 0 T H S.W. 2 8 T H A V . S .W .TERR28TH AVENUE S.W .2 8 T H A V . S .W .S.W. A V E N U E 2 8 T H A V . S .W .28TH AVENUE S.W .49TH2 8 T H 5 1 S T S T. S .W. RSF-3 RMF-6 RSF-3 RMF-6 RMF-12 C-4 C-4 RSF-3 RSF-3 R M F- 6 RSF-3 RMF-6RMF-12RMF-12RMF-6PUD RMF-6 C-1 RMF-6 RMF-12 RSF-3 C-4 PUD RMF-6 RMF-6 PUD RMF-12 RSF-3 RMF-12-GGDCCO P CPUD RMF-6-GGDCCO RSF-3-GGDCCOPUD V CU OSP CU, V V PE CU PU"a" V V V V PU AW CU CU CU ACTIVITY CENTER #15 GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY (C.R. 886) - CORONADO PARKWAY Collier County, Florida £PREPARED BY: GIS/CAD MAPPING SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT FILE: proposedAC15.mxd Date: 4/2018 0 200 400 600100 Feet LEGEND ACTIVITY CENTER BOUNDARY RSF-3 EXISTING ZONING (NOTE: PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY; THE OFFICIAL SOURCE OF ZONING INFORMATION IS THE ZONING ATLAS SET, WHICH IS PART OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE. ORDINANCE NO. 04-41, AS AMENDED) DEVELOPED LAND USE EXISTING BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES AMENDED - SEPTEMBER 13, 2011 (Ord. No. 2011-26) AMENDED - JANUARY 25, 2005 (Ord. No. 2005-3) AMENDED - JUNE 13, 2017 (Ord. No. 2017-22) ADDITION Staff Proposed Draft AmendmentsGolden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-24/29/19Page 3 of 39.A.3.d Packet Pg. 447 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 448 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 449 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 450 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Words underlined are added; words struck-through are deleted. Row of asterisks (**** **** ****) denotes break in text. Conservation and Coastal Management Element (Adopted October 1997, amended through December 12, 2017 by Ordinance no. 2017-48) GOAL 6: [pg. 16] TO IDENTIFY, PROTECT, CONSERVE AND APPROPRIATELY USE NATIVE VEGETATIVE COMMUNITIES AND WILDLIFE HABITAT. OBJECTIVE 6.1 [pg. 16] Protect native vegetative communities through the application of minimum preservation requirements. (The Policies under this Objective apply to all of Collier County except for that portion of the County which is identified on the Countywide Future Land Use Map (FLUM) as the Rural Lands Stewardship Area Overlay.) Policy 6.1.1 [pg. 16] For the County’s Urban Designated Area, Estates Designated Area, Conservation Designated Area, and Agricultural/Rural Mixed Use District, Rural-Industrial District and Rural-Settlement Area District as designated on the FLUM, native vegetation shall be preserved through the application of the following minimum preservation and vegetation retention standards and criteria, unless the development occurs within the Area of Critical State Concern (ACSC) where the ACSC standards referenced in the Future Land Use Element shall apply. Notwithstanding the ACSC requirements, this Policy shall apply to all non-agricultural development except for single-family dwelling units situated on individual parcels that are not located within a watershed management conservation area identified in a Watershed Management Plan developed pursuant to Policies supporting Objective 2.1 of this Element. For property in Golden Gate Estates and designated Residential Estates in the Golden Gate Area Master Plan, the subdivision of parcels up to 13 acres in size into single family lots shall be treated as single family dwelling units under the preceding sentence. For properties not previously within the Coastal High Hazard Area but now within the Coastal High Hazard Area due to adoption of a revised Coastal High Hazard Area boundary in 2013, the native vegetation preservation and retention standards of the Non-Coastal High Hazard Area shall continue to apply. (Reference the Coastal High Hazard Area Comparison Map in the Future Land Use Element.) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 1 of 1 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 451 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 452 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 453 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 454 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Words underlined are added; words struck-through are deleted. Row of asterisks (**** **** ****) denotes break in text. PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT Solid Waste Disposal Sub-Element (Adopted October 1997, amended through December 12, 2017 by Ordinance no. 2017-48) GOAL: [pg. 2] TO PROVIDE AN EFFICIENT AND ECONOMICAL BALANCE OF PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SERVICES THAT WILL ENABLE THE PEOPLE OF COLLIER COUNTY TO MEET THE ESTABLISHED REQUIREMENTS FOR SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL AND MANAGEMENT IN A MANNER THAT ASSURES PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY AND PROTECTS THE ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES OF COLLIER COUNTY. *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** OBJECTIVE 2: (DISPOSAL) [pg. 16] Utilize safe and efficient methods for environmentally sound disposal of solid waste in accordance with local, State and Federal regulations and investigate improved methods and implement practices that meet this Objective. *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** Policy 2.15: [pg. 16] The County shall continue to pursue a best management practices approach to making septage treatment available to residents and businesses within Golden Gate Estates, as a component of bio-solid processing, either directly, through a private entity, or through a public private partnership. Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 1 of 1 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 455 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 456 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 457 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 458 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Words underlined are added; words struck-through are deleted. Row of asterisks (**** **** ****) denotes break in text. PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT Stormwater Management Sub-Element (Adopted October 1997, amended through December 12, 2017 by Ordinance no. 2017-48) GOAL: [pg. 2] TO PROVIDE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FACILITIES AND SERVICES FOR DRAINAGE AND FLOOD PROTECTION FOR EXISTING AND FUTURE DEVELOPMENT, MINIMIZE THE DEGRADATION OF QUALITY OF RECEIVING WATERS AND SURROUNDING NATURAL AREAS AND PROTECT THE FUNCTIONS OF NATURAL GROUNDWATER AQUIFER RECHARGE AREAS. *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** OBJECTIVE 2: [pg. 3] Maintain adopted drainage level of service standards for basins and sub-basins identified in the Water Management Master Plan. Maintenance of the drainage level of service (LOS) identified for each basin will be implemented through the watershed management planning process identified within Goal 2 of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element of this Growth Management Plan. *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** Policy 2.3: [pg. 3] The County will periodically coordinate with the South Florida Water Management District to review the Level of Service Standards for primary water management canals within the County and their effect on Golden Gate Estates. *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** OBJECTIVE 5: [pg. 4] Regulate land use and development in a manner that protects the functions of natural drainage features, the stormwater management network and natural groundwater aquifer recharge areas. Implementation of this Objective will be consistent with the Watershed Management Planning process identified within Goal 2 of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element of the Growth Management Plan, and with relevant provisions contained within the adopted Land Development Code (Ordinance Number 2004-41, as amended). *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** Policy 5.3 [pg. 4] The County will continue to identify and implement educational opportunities related to water resources for parcel owners, homeowners, builders, real estate professionals and the public to aid in understanding and addressing site-specific financial and environmental impacts as well as area-wide impacts to water resources. Policy 5.4 [pg. 4] Within two years of adoption, the County will initiate a study on the feasibility of dispersed water management (DWM) for Golden Gate Estates, and determine the extent to which it will rely on voluntary, incentive or mandatory provisions and whether provisions will apply to developed and undeveloped parcels in Golden Gate Estates. Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 1 of 1 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 459 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 460 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 461 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 462 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Words underlined are added; words struck-through are deleted. Row of asterisks (**** **** ****) denotes break in text. Transportation Element (Adopted October 1997, amended through December 12, 2017 by Ordinance no. 2017-48) GOAL: [pg. 10] TO PLAN FOR, DEVELOP AND OPERATE A SAFE, EFFICIENT, AND COST EFFECTIVE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM THAT PROVIDES FOR BOTH THE MOTORIZED AND NON- MOTORIZED MOVEMENT OF PEOPLE AND GOODS THROUGHOUT COLLIER COUNTY. *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** OBJECTIVE 10: [pg. 21] Encourage safe and efficient mobility for the rural public that remains consistent with the character of the rural areas of Collier County. *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** Policy 10.3: [pg. 21] Everglades Boulevard, between Golden Gate Boulevard and 1-75, shall not be expanded beyond 4 lanes. Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan – CCPC Adoption Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 4/29/19 Page 1 of 1 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 463 Attachment: Adoption GGAMP Ordinances (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Recommendation to approve proposed amendments to the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) and related elements of the Growth Management Plan (GMP) for transmittal to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity (DEO) for review and objections, recommendations and comments (ORC) response, and to provide direction to staff on any additional amendment language for further review at adoption. [Transmittal Hearing] OBJECTIVE: For the Board of County Commissioners (Board) to review and approve the proposed amendments to the GGAMP and related elements of the GMP, direct transmittal to DEO for review and provide direction to staff pertaining to the inclusion of any additional amendment language for consideration at the adoption hearings. CONSIDERATIONS: On February 10, 2015, the Board directed staff to initiate GMP restudies in four areas of eastern Collier County, focusing on complementary land uses, economic vitality, mobility, and environmental sustainability through a public outreach effort. The Board appointed the Growth Management Oversight Committee (GMOC), which first convened in December 2015. The GMOC directs public outreach efforts and ultimately assures economic vitality, environmental sustainability, and consistency among the four eastern area Plans. The proposed Growth Management Plan (GMP) revisions found in Attachment A to this report (and Resolution, Exhibit A) are derived from the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) Restudy White Paper dated December 2017. These were presented at a public hearing before Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) on July 19, 2018, in its capacity as the County’s Land Planning Agency and as convened as the County’s Environmental Advisory Committee (EAC). The White Paper, Attachment B, provides the data and analysis underlying the revisions to Goals, Objectives, Policies, and Land Use Designation Descriptions within the GGAMP (Attachment A). The substantive discussion of the recommendations appears in Attachment B, Section 3. Meeting summaries and survey results provide the foundation for recommendations (Attachment B, Appendix A). The Golden Gate area is bordered on the west by the greater urban area of Collier County, on the north and south by the RFMUD and on the east by the RLSA. It includes three diverse geographic areas: the rural Estates (east of CR 951), the urban Estates (west of CR 951), and Golden Gate City, an unincorporated urban area. Outreach generally reflected these geographic areas. The outcomes of public participation and resulting recommendations resulted in re-organization of the Goals, Objectives, and Policies (GOPs) with the intent to better define GOPs associated with the Estates and GOPs associated with Golden Gate City. Due to the similarity in outcomes between the urban and rural Estates, those areas are combined in Goals 4-7. One might over-simplify the present recommended changes to the GGAMP as incremental changes favoring: (a) Economic development and redevelopment in Golden Gate City, and (b) Safety and environment in the Golden Gate Estates. Comprehensive Plan changes alone rarely make these things happen. Rather, they foster the vision, communication, and resources to allow the continued improvement of place-making, through future ordinances, budget expenditures, and land use petition decisions. In some policies, interim measures such as feasibility studies and reports are called for. Additional comments on Golden Gate City and Golden 9.A.3.e Packet Pg. 464 Attachment: Transmittal Executive Summary (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 2 Gate Estates are as follows: (a) Golden Gate City contains several commercial areas that are centrally located to the population. The available acreage for commercial development is sufficient to support the residents of Golden Gate City and the surrounding area; therefore, there is not a need to designate additional areas. Instead, focus and attention are needed within the current commercial areas. For the community vision of a vibrant, walkable community to be realized, redevelopment and renewal in specific areas are needed. The proposed target areas for redevelopment include the Mixed Use Activity Center Subdistrict and the Downtown Center Commercial Subdistrict along Golden Gate Parkway. The key proposed amendments to support the vision include measures to increase job opportunities by adding several specific land uses to the Mixed Use Activity Center designation. These uses support target industries such as advanced manufacturing and computer and electronic manufacturing, or 3-d printing. By adding these uses, it is the intent to encourage economic development with a larger workforce to support surrounding retail and entertainment. Staff is continuing to evaluate the proposed uses and will revise the list if necessary for the CCPC and BCC adoption hearings. A zoning overlay will be considered to implement these uses within the Mixed Use Activity Center, along with development standards that provide greater support to a pedestrian environment. Redevelopment tools for Golden Gate City have already been initiated. The Collier County Water- Sewer District’s assumption of services in Golden Gate City will significantly improve expansion and reliability to commercial property owners and residents, eliminating constraints caused by limited service. In May, Golden Gate City received a federal Opportunity Zone designation. This is a significant redevelopment tool that offers tax incentives for private development. Property owners have expressed great enthusiasm for this designation. Additionally, a local Economic Development Ordinance has been drafted for the Board’s consideration. If this ordinance is adopted, it will create tax increment financing (TIF) to provide a funding source for infrastructure and other incentives in the proposed redevelopment area. (b) In many ways, residents of the Rural and Urban Residential Estates Subdistrict were satisfied with the status quo. They favor a low density, rural character with limited commercial and conditional uses, along with architectural and lighting standards supporting their unique identity. Citizens voiced most support in creating or bolstering safety and environmental considerations. Reflecting the historic development pattern in the estates, lengthy streets and avenues typically end at canal locations. This factor raises safety concerns, both for emergency providers and for emergency evacuation. As documented in the previous study of the GGAMP, there is a strong desire for increased funding for and prioritization of bridge connections to foster mobility for safety reasons. Likewise, funding and coordination for wildfire prevention remain a high priority. Citizens feel a close connection to environmental issues and display growing awareness of the difficult balance between flood protection and wetland conservation. New policies reflect this awareness by calling for feasibility studies related to dispersed water management and lot combination incentives, as additional conservation measures to those identified in the Collier County Watershed Management Plan. An evaluation of the recommended changes resulted in a need to amend other GMP elements for consistency and clear communication to the reader. Accordingly, there are several recommended amendments that are also packaged under Exhibit A, “Other GMP Amendments.” These Objectives, Policies or Land Use Designation Descriptions mirror the GGAMP recommended text. Each will require a 9.A.3.e Packet Pg. 465 Attachment: Transmittal Executive Summary (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 3 separate Ordinance at adoption because they are separate elements within the GMP: (a) Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME). Single-family preserve standards, appearing in GGAMP Policy 1.3.2; also at CCME Policy 6.1.1. (b) Future Land Use Element (FLUE). Uses within Activity Center #15, appearing in GGAMP, Land Use Designation Description 1.B.1; also in FLUE Designation Description Section, Urban, C.1.2. (c) Public Facilities Element, Solid Waste Disposal Sub-element (SWD): Septage disposal system improvements, appearing in GGAMP Policy 5.3.8; also in SWD Policy 2.15. (d) Public Facilities Element, Stormwater Sub-element: Dispersed water management study, education and canal level of service in Policies 5.3.5, 5.3.6 and 5.3.7; also in Stormwater Sub-element Policies 5.4, 5.3 and 2.3. (e) Transportation Element. Everglades Blvd. maximum number of lanes, appearing in GGAMP Policy 6.1.3; also in Transportation Element Policy 10.3. The CCPC, by motion 6-0, recommended transmittal of the GMP amendments subject to certain changes. In all cases, staff agreed with these changes, which are incorporated into the strikethrough/underline documents at hand. Many of the changes were clarification of intent or improved wording. The most substantive changes recommended by the CCPC were as follows: 1. In creating greenways, eminent domain should not be an option, as was stated in the existing GGAMP provisions (Policy 5.1.3). 2. Neighborhood Centers should be upsized only through private GMP amendment (Land Use Designation Descriptions (2) (A) (2) (b) (I)). 3. Electrical substations should not trigger conditional use eligibility on adjoining properties. (Land Use Designation Descriptions (2) (A) (3) (d) (6)). 4. Cell towers as conditional uses should have locational restrictions, specifically, limited to parcels no smaller than 2.25 acres and adjacent to arterial and collector roadways (Land Use Designation Descriptions (2) (A) (3) (e) (5)). The Board, at its meeting on September 11, 2018, directed staff to review an additional potential change to the GGAMP during the transmittal hearing process. The issue was whether the current size allocations for Neighborhood Centers is sufficient, or whether these should be “upsized” to account for past and future right-of-way takings and other site constraints for purposes of land use efficiency and public expectations for goods and services at specific locations inside the rural Estates. An additional memo addressing this outreach is included as the last attachment. Information was gathered and presented to the public reflecting market demand and site viability at a public information meeting held on November 1, 2018. The majority of the approximately 130 people in attendance indicated that they did not support any additional acreage allocations regardless of market potential or sight constraint. An online survey resulted in the same outcome. The amendment package as presented reflects public preference. At some point in the future, private petitions could be considered based on site specific information, intended use, neighborhood meetings and compatibility among other factors. A public hearing was held before the Board of County Commissioners (Board) on January 22, 2019, to consider Transmittal documents for proposed changes to the GGAMP. Following presentation by staff, public comment and discussion by the Board, the item was continued to February 12, 2019 to consider two concerns raised by the Golden Gate Estates Area Civic Association (GGEACA). The specifics of that request are contained in the updated-memo-to-Board, dated 1-25-19, attached to this executive summary. FISCAL IMPACT: The fiscal impact of the proposed GMPA process has been accounted for within the approved budget for the Zoning Division. GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) IMPACT: The various Plan recommendations are expected 9.A.3.e Packet Pg. 466 Attachment: Transmittal Executive Summary (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 4 to result in amendments to the respective elements of the GMP, to be considered by the state Department of Economic Opportunity, and again at adoption public hearings before the CCPC and the Board. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This Growth Management Plan amendment is authorized by, and subject to the procedures established in, Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes, The Community Planning Act, and by Collier County Resolution No. 12-234, as amended. The Board should consider the following criteria in making its decision: “plan amendments shall be based on relevant and appropriate data and an analysis by the local government that may include but not be limited to, surveys, studies, community goals and vision, and other data available at the time of adoption of the plan amendment. To be based on data means to react to it in an appropriate way and to the extent, necessary indicated by the data available on that particular subject at the time of adoption of the plan or plan amendment at issue.” 163.3177(1)(f), FS. This item is approved as to form and legality. It requires a majority vote for approval because this is a transmittal hearing of the GMP amendment. [HFAC] RECOMMENDATION: To approve by Resolution the proposed amendments to the GGAMP and the GMP, direct transmittal to DEO for review. Prepared by: Kris Van Lengen, JD, AICP, Community Planning Manager, Zoning Division 9.A.3.e Packet Pg. 467 Attachment: Transmittal Executive Summary (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 9.A.3.f Packet Pg. 468 Attachment: Trans_Continuation Memo to Board_1.25.19 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 9.A.3.f Packet Pg. 469 Attachment: Trans_Continuation Memo to Board_1.25.19 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 9.A.3.f Packet Pg. 470 Attachment: Trans_Continuation Memo to Board_1.25.19 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 9.A.3.f Packet Pg. 471 Attachment: Trans_Continuation Memo to Board_1.25.19 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 9.A.3.f Packet Pg. 472 Attachment: Trans_Continuation Memo to Board_1.25.19 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 9.A.3.f Packet Pg. 473 Attachment: Trans_Continuation Memo to Board_1.25.19 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 9.A.3.f Packet Pg. 474 Attachment: Trans_Continuation Memo to Board_1.25.19 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 9.A.3.f Packet Pg. 475 Attachment: Trans_Continuation Memo to Board_1.25.19 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 9.A.3.f Packet Pg. 476 Attachment: Trans_Continuation Memo to Board_1.25.19 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 9.A.3.fPacket Pg. 477Attachment: Trans_Continuation Memo to Board_1.25.19 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 1 Growth Management Department Zoning Division/Community Planning Section MEMORANDUM To: BCC File Attachments; PL 2018- 0261 From: Kris Van Lengen, Community Planning Manager Date: November 20, 2018 Subject: Neighborhood Centers in Rural Golden Gate Estates Background: At its regular meeting on September 14, 2018, the Board directed staff to forestall a Transmittal Hearing scheduled for September 28, 2018 on the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) to further study the idea of increasing the potential sizes of designated Neighborhood Center Subdistrict locations within the rural portion of Golden Gate Estates. This memo supplements the Exhibits and Attachments submitted for this Transmittal hearing. Issue During the Restudy: Current provisions for current and future Neighborhood Centers are very site-specific. Of the three Neighborhood Centers located in the rural Estates, there are nine identified quadrants with sizes based on actual or historic parcel sizes, ranging between 4 and 9 acres, net of past or future right-of-way needs. All are located at arterial intersections. Only one of the three Subdistrict locations (Golden Gate Blvd. and Wilson Blvd.) has been developed to date, although zoning approval for some of the other sites has been obtained. There are three quadrants at the Wilson intersection, and all are at least partially developed. The fourth quadrant is not a Neighborhood Center Subdistrict, but rather a 40-acre undeveloped “Estates Shopping Center Subdistrict” with PUD zoning approval. The White Paper (Attachment B) identifies the expanded size of centers as an initial recommendation, as the Golden Gate Estates Area Civic Association (GGEACA) recommended a potential increase to no more than 20 acres per quadrant. During that time, factors mentioned in support of larger commercial development areas were based on collateral needs more than increased commercial square footage. Those factors included water management, road right-of way, parking, setbacks, buffers, preserves, well and septic, fire suppression, etc. Surveys conducted during the 2017 Workshops indicated support for obtaining commercial opportunities outside of the Estates, but also generally supported “rightsizing” the designated Subdistricts for purposes of functionality, without adding any additional locations. The staff Report for the Planning Commission noted the following alteration from initial recommendations as follows: 9.A.3.g Packet Pg. 478 Attachment: Trans_file attchmnts BCC memo_Neighborhood Centers_11/2018 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 2 “Rightsizing” Neighborhood Centers (White Paper, pages 33-35). The community valued an avenue to add acreage to existing Neighborhood Centers to provide better function and economic viability, particularly where future road development, septic treatment or stormwater capture creates space constraints. The Golden Gate Estates Area Civic Association (GGEACA) had recommended a maximum of 80 acres within 4 quadrants, equating to 20 acres per quadrant. After further staff analysis, the maximum acreage was removed from the Master Plan language, in favor of criteria for consideration. Further, the reach of this amendment is confined to 2 quadrants at the intersection of Wilson and Golden Gate Boulevards, since those have established development footprints. The concern is that public might assume that 20 acres is a recommendation or safe harbor for a zoning application. The Planning Commission considered the issue of expanding the potential sizes of Neighborhood Centers during the Transmittal Hearing on July 19, 2018. With respect to the two proposed locations noted above, public speakers were not in favor of expanding the Subdistrict. The Planning Commission determined that the developers or owners should pursue this change, if desired. Further, the Planning Commission opined that no other Neighborhood Center locations should be considered for expansion as part of the restudy amendments, but should be considered, if at all, through private petitions. Public Input After September 14, 2018: Community Planning staff gathered information and planned public outreach to address Board direction. Staff assembled background information on existing Neighborhood Center locations, provided a “utility analysis” that estimated the size and nature of commercial operations based on footprint and infrastructure needs on 5, 10 and 20- acre properties, and provided a market analysis for different intensities of use. It should be noted that the Centers on Everglades Blvd. /Golden Gate Blvd. and at Everglades Blvd. /Immokalee Rd. would not have sufficient demand for a single 10-acre quadrant commercial development until approximately 2030. The intersection of Golden Gate Blvd. and Wilson Blvd. already has an approved 40-acre site (Estates Shopping Center). The County issued a News Release for the planned Public Information Meeting (PIM). Based on projected market areas for new Neighborhood Center locations, over 200 letters and over 11,000 postcards were mailed to rural Estates residents as well. The News Release, letters and cards advised of the PIM to exchange ideas and identified a County website that provided background site and market analysis as well as an on-line survey. The NIM was held at Max Hasse Community Park on November 1, 2018. Over 130 persons attended. Following staff’s presentation, members of the public were encouraged to speak. The vast majority of those who spoke favored no change to the current sizing of centers in the GGAMP, regardless of previous or future right-of-way takings by the County. More specifically, the majority of attendees agreed: 9.A.3.g Packet Pg. 479 Attachment: Trans_file attchmnts BCC memo_Neighborhood Centers_11/2018 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 3 • “The Wilson and Golden Gate Boulevard Center is 40% vacant. Why would we increase new Centers when the one that exists is not successful? We don’t want more vacant shopping centers” (applause) • “We live here to be rural. We don’t need a Publix every 6 miles.” (applause) • “People don’t move out here for [shopping] convenience.” • “Commercial surround the Estates is good enough.” • “We shop in the City, and don’t want shopping out here.” • “Let Rural Lands West have the commercial.” • “Expanding Centers will promote continued [commercial] creep.” • “We like what we have, quiet, nature. No more stores.” • “Keep rural like it is. Do shopping in town.” • “Put commercial centers in Rural Lands West and surrounding areas.” • “Concerned more commercial will increase traffic for surrounding residents” • “A lot of fringe areas will serve the Estates.” Some attendees shared support for modest size increases, more specifically: • “The Walgreens example is ok in size [for Neighborhood Centers].” • “Increasing the Neighborhood Center acreage to 8 acres is ok to be able to store their own water.” • “Would rather have them bigger for people to get in and out easier.” • “We should consider there are constraints on the properties that make them difficult to build so they need to be bigger.” • “The County should budget 2 million to run utility lines to the Center at Wilson and Golden Gate Boulevard, so they won’t need drain fields.” While a large number of residents turned out for the NIM, participation in the survey was limited, totaling only 33 responses. These responses were consistent with the NIM participation, reflecting a preference for no change (61%) compared to those who favored either a 10-acre or 20-acre maximum development per quadrant (39%). Some interesting take-aways from the survey: a majority of the respondents who lived outside of a 1,000 foot distance from a Neighborhood Center Subdistrict were against any change; there were 6 “undecided” respondents, 4 of whom lived within a 1,000 foot distance. The survey process provided a platform for written public comment. The full list of comments is incorporated, (unedited) below: • Enough--let Rural Lands West be the mess it will be and leave Golden Gate alone. I have lived here 11 years+ and only once missed something at the store. We have enough opportunities for restaurants, shopping, etc on 951 and Immokalee (which you have allowed to go so crazy). They are only 15 minutes for goodness sake, same as Ave Maris. I do not want to any more commercial building. • We need a hardware and department store out here. 9.A.3.g Packet Pg. 480 Attachment: Trans_file attchmnts BCC memo_Neighborhood Centers_11/2018 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 4 • Need more stuff out here • I live here for the peace and solitude. Although Publix is the nearest super market I choose to do grocery shopping at stores such as Aldi, Trader Joe, Oaks Farms for the variety they offer. The one place I like is Walgreen's at Wilson. Don't mess up Everglades Blvd and Golden gate Blvd • I do not wish to expand or encroach on ANY further acreage for commercial use. Maintaining rural RESIDENTIAL character is desired. For years the Estates have remained rural and people adjust and accommodate to live here. Consumers know where and what they're purchasing out here. • The key is to ensure the businesses are sustainable. Between Publix & a CVS/Walgreens on every other corner, we have enough pharmacies! Maybe some eateries (Chick-Fil-A, Pollo Tropical) auto parts shop, hair dresser/barber, crafts store. • As this area continues to grow it will be necessary to expand on the current neighborhood centers. While many think that this growth will take away from the "nature" they came here for it is inevitable that growth will continue in the estates. Soon the Publix at Randall will not be enough to accommodate this growth, it is almost already impossible to find a parking spot there. Personally, I am getting tired of having to travel 10-20 miles simply to mail a package. Additionally, with planned road expansions using up the pre-approved areas, these areas will be too small to accommodate much of anything. For these reasons, I vote for the expansion of the existing land use areas. There is enough privacy remaining in the area if these expansions are approved. I chose 20 acres but 10 could even help. Not expanding at all is not the answer as growth will continue out here in the estates whether we like it or not with all the additional homes currently being built. • It is ridiculous to build anything at everglades and the blvd. It's the heart of the estates and so much already exists and is being built within a very short distance. If there is expansion it will eat my home. I will lose absolutely everything that I loved here for. The increased intersection already being built is not even needed. I never wait long at all at the corner and have never been backed up in traffic... until I get further to where things have been built. Any building will bring traffic, accidents, crime, loss of stars at night, displacement of wildlife, destruction of nature and chips away at everything that makes this place special. I don't want it. If it will be forced on me and my neighbors by people too lazy to drive a few extra minutes - then buy my house now because this neighborhood will lose everything i moved here for. • No more commercial or residential development period. The wildlife is already endangered and Collier County wants to "take" the natural habitat of these animals. Remember ESA.9 makes it unlawful for anyone to "take" a listed animal, and this includes significantly modifying its habitat. 8 applicants want to build more resident, development and mining activities in northeastern Collier County. Collier County already approved the build out of 10,000 homes NO MORE DEVELOPMENT. • WE R FINE, just the way we r and how we wish to be. Please no more trying to improve GGE. We r and wish to remain rural. 9.A.3.g Packet Pg. 481 Attachment: Trans_file attchmnts BCC memo_Neighborhood Centers_11/2018 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 5 • We desperate need a gas station ...7-11 or a wawa on the S.E. corner of GG Blvd/ Everglades. The closest one is 6 miles away at Wisom and GG Blvd and its so crouded all the time you can never get in. There are so many more people in this area a gas station and convientent store will will be ablessing. We all have our fingers crosse it happens. • Golden Gate Estates is a rural area and needs to stay that way. This is why we have chosen to live here. • Before any development takes place, what exactly is a Neighborhood Center, and what is it comprised of? Also, what kind of cell phone relay towers will be built to improve communication out here on a consistent basis? • There is no need for services in GG Estates. We have a Walgreens, a 7 -11, It is only a 20 minute drive to get to 951. More shopping brings the city to us, destroys our country atmosphere. The majority of people want to stay small according to the responce at the Nov. 1st meeting at Max Hasse. • personally, i don't think we need any centers at ggb & everglades • NO MORE COMMERCIALNDECELOPMENTS IN NEIGH BORHOODS • Hopefully this survey will mean something. It is so important to make sure we don't destroy the estates. We need well thought out planning for everyone. • No further increases - it will destroy the Rural Environment. The Public on the Corner of Randall and Immokalee and now CVS are hard to get into and out of. The parking lot is a maze. I spend more time getting into and out of then if I shop at Publix on Collier or Vanderbilt. • No more commercial centers that only give money to the owners of the buildings with high rent! No more Poorly managed buildings that need up keeping. We need things for our kids to do out here. We need parks or a day care center not more markets or gas stations. • We prefer GGE to remain rural. No new commercial development is needed or desired. Please stop forcing this on us. We live here for the specific reason of it being quiet, rural and full of wildlife. • An NC at Golden Gate Boulevard and Everglades Boulevard is not nessesary if the NC at G G Blvd and Wilson is fully developed. • There is no reason to expand the commercial lot properties on the corners of Golden gate Boulevard and Everglades Blvd. I just purchased my house on the corner of Golden Gate Blvd and Everglades Blvd S and I don't want to lose it. So I' am against on widening those commercial corners because there is no need for it. • Commercial development in residential areas needs to stop. We can drive to any of the grocery and other stores on the outskirts of GGE, we do not need them inside our boundaries. • I understand that Naples is growing whether I like it or not. I just don't like living in limbo and with uncertainty. This is incredibly stressful to not know if our house will be taken away from us at all. If someone is going to build commercial buildings on these lots, then it makes sense to not be wasteful and put one tiny story on 4 acres of land. It's conflicting 9.A.3.g Packet Pg. 482 Attachment: Trans_file attchmnts BCC memo_Neighborhood Centers_11/2018 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 6 because this directly affects me. I just hope that you guys can come to a quick and fair decision for all of us involved. • Build it up. • Keep the estates rural. We will have convenient access to the future RRW and orangetgree's Publix and wilson shopping centers. Additional mixed use and commercial properties detract from the aesthetics of the rural Estates, and with more store fronts standing empty than full as a result of poor property management, excessive rent (example, Brooks Plaza and the wilson center, multiple units stand empty), it looks rundown. It's easier to go into town and shop for everything at once and leave the traffic, crime, cranky people there and travel back to our peace and quiet. Keep in mind this a "Rural Area," and never advertised to have the same services as a downtown or suburbs. • Nobody on our street wants this! • When we purchased our Estates property it was located on an unpaved limestone dead end street. We moved to the estates because of its rural character and wildlife having moved to Collier in 1970 to escape our overcrowded birth place Miami. We do not want to see GGE become an overbuilt extension of Naples to the west. Most of us work or travel outside of the estates and do our shopping etc, while out in "town". While neighborhood centers can have certain advantages, we prefer the Estates commercial centers to remain small rather than succumb to development pressures. Avoid overbuilding that would result in the Estates losing its rural character and the accrued benefits to those of us who chose to live here fully realizing the lack of commercial development. • No more gas stations and convenience stores! We want restaurants and a Trader Joe's! Staff Recommendation: Based on consensus from the Planning Commission to recommend no change to existing Neighborhood Center provisions, and the same sentiment from a majority of residents in rural Golden Gate Estates, staff recommends no further changes to the Neighborhood Center Subdistricts in the GGAMP at this time, without prejudice to a site-specific proposal from the private sector. 9.A.3.g Packet Pg. 483 Attachment: Trans_file attchmnts BCC memo_Neighborhood Centers_11/2018 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Agenda Item 9 ‒ 1 ‒ CPSP-2018-2 / PL20180000261 Staff Proposed Golden Gate Area Master Plan Amendments STAFF REPORT COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT, ZONING DIVISION, COMMUNITY PLANNING SECTION HEARING DATE: July 19, 2018 RE: PETITION PL20180000261, STAFF-PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN OF THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN [TRANSMITTAL HEARING] INTRODUCTION The proposed Growth Management Plan (GMP) revisions found in Attachment A to this report (and Resolution, Exhibit A) are derived from the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) Restudy White Paper dated December 2017. These are presented to the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC), in its capacity as the County’s Land Planning Agency and as convened as the County’s Environmental Advisory Committee (EAC) for consideration of GMP amendments at Transmittal stage public hearings. Staff requests the CCPC and EAC forward these amendments to the Board of County Commissioners (Board) with a recommendation to Transmit to the FL Department of Economic Opportunity (DEO). BACKGROUND On February 10, 2015 the Board directed staff to initiate GMP “restudies” of four GMP master plans in eastern Collier County: Rural Fringe Mixed Use District (RFMUD), Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP), Rural Lands Stewardship Area (RLSA), and Immokalee Area Master Plan (IAMP). The GGAMP restudy was undertaken beginning in April 2016. As with all restudies, through a public outreach effort, staff focused on complementary land uses, economic vitality, mobility and environmental sustainability. The Board appointed an ad hoc advisory committee, the Growth Management Oversight Committee (GMOC), which first convened in December 2015. The GMOC has directed the public engagement process of the restudies since inception. The GMOC reviews the restudy recommendations from a high level, non-granular perspective, emphasizing consistency among the restudies, sustainability and economic vitality. Unlike prior area restudies, however, the Board directed that staff, rather than appointed committees, provide recommendations to the Board covering each of the four areas. The White Paper, Attachment B, provides the data and analysis underlying the revisions to Goals, Objectives, Policies and Land Use Designation Descriptions within the GGAMP (Attachment A). The substantive discussion of the recommendations appears in Attachment B, Section 3. Meeting 9.A.3.h Packet Pg. 484 Attachment: Transmittal_Staff Report (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Agenda Item 9 ‒ 2 ‒ CPSP-2018-2 / PL20180000261 Staff Proposed Golden Gate Area Master Plan Amendments summaries and survey results provide the foundation for recommendations (Attachment B, Appendix A). At its meeting on December 7, 2017, the GMOC found the White Paper and its recommendations consistent with public participation direction, supportive of sustainability and economic vitality and, so far as known, consistent with other restudy planning efforts. The White Paper was presented to the Board on January 23, 2018. At that time, the Board directed staff to initiate the GMP Amendment process for the proposed changes to the GGAMP. The Golden Gate area is bordered on the west by the greater urban area of Collier County, on the north and south by the RFMUD and on the east by the RLSA. It includes three diverse geographic areas: the eastern or rural Estates (east of CR 951), the western or urban Estates (west of CR 951), and Golden Gate City, an unincorporated urban area. Outreach generally reflected these geographic areas. The outcomes of public participation and resulting recommendations resulted in re-organization of the Goals, Objectives and Policies (GOPs) with the intent to better define GOPs associated with the Estates and GOPs associated with Golden Gate City. The reorganization is further explained in the following section. The history and current conditions of the Golden Gate area are described in Section 2 of the White Paper. Residents and stakeholders have remained vigilant in protecting Golden Gate throughout its history. The County adopted its first Growth Management Plan in 1989, which included a recommendation to create a separate element in the GMP, based on the recognition of Golden Gate’s unique character. Importantly, the GGAMP was carefully reviewed and modified in 2004 under a Restudy Committee. There are no major departures in this restudy from the desires, visions and policies at that time. One might over-simplify the present recommended changes to the GGAMP as incremental changes favoring: (a) Economic development and redevelopment in Golden Gate City, and (b) Safety and environment in the Golden Gate Estates. Comprehensive Plan changes alone rarely make these things happen. Rather, they foster the vision, communication and resources to allow the continued improvement of place -making, through future ordinances, budget expenditures and land use petition decisions. In some policies, interim measures such as feasibility studies and reports are called for. Additional comments on Golden Gate City and Golden Gate Estates follows: (a) Golden Gate City contains several commercial areas that are centrally located to the population. The available acreage for commercial development is sufficient to support the residents of Golden Gate City and the surrounding area; therefore, there is not a need to designate additional areas. Instead, focus and attention are needed within the current commercial areas. For the community vision of a vibrant, walkable community to be realized, redevelopment and renewal in specific areas is needed. The proposed areas to emphasize redevelopment efforts are the Mixed Use Activity Center Subdistrict and the Downtown Center Commercial Subdistrict along Golden Gate Parkway. The key proposed amendments to support the vision include measures to increase job opportunities by adding several specific land uses to the Mixed Use Activity Center 9.A.3.h Packet Pg. 485 Attachment: Transmittal_Staff Report (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Agenda Item 9 ‒ 3 ‒ CPSP-2018-2 / PL20180000261 Staff Proposed Golden Gate Area Master Plan Amendments designation. These uses support target industries such as, advanced manufacturing, call centers, software development, and data and information processing. By adding these uses, it is the intent to encourage economic development with a larger work force to support surrounding retail and entertainment. A zoning overlay may be considered to implement these uses within the Mixed Use Activity Center, along with development standards that provide greater support to a pedestrian environment. Redevelopment tools for Golden Gate City have already been initiated. The Collier County Water-Sewer District’s assumption of services in Golden Gate City significantly improves expansion and reliability to commercial property owners and residents, eliminating constraints caused by limited service. In May, Golden Gate City received a federal Opportunity Zone designation. This is a significant redevelopment tool that offers tax incentives for private development. Property owners have expressed great enthusiasm for this designation. Additionally, a local Economic Development Ordinance is being drafted for the Board’s consideration. This ordinance will create tax increment financing (TIF) to provide a funding source for infrastructure and other incentives in the pr oposed redevelopment area. (b) In many ways, residents of the Rural and Urban Residential Estates Subdistrict were satisfied with the status quo. They favor a low density, rural character with limited commercial and conditional uses, along with architectural and lighting standards supporting their unique identity. Citizens voiced most support in creating or bolstering safety and environmental considerations. Reflecting the historic development pattern in the estates, lengthy streets and avenues typically end at canal locations. This factor raises safety concerns, both for emergency providers and for emergency evacuation. As documented in the previous study of the GGAMP, there is a strong desire for increased funding for and prioritization of bridge connections to foster mobility for safety reasons. Likewise, funding and coordination for wildfire prevention remains a high priority. Citizens also feel a close connection to environmental issues, and display growing awareness of the difficult balance between flood protection and wetland conservation. New policies reflect this awareness by calling for feasibility studies related to dispersed water management and lot combination incentives, as additional conservation measures to those identified in the Collier County Watershed Management Plan. REORGANIZATION AND PRESENTATION FOR TRANSMITTAL The existing Goals, Objectives and Policies (GOPs) in the GGAMP are currently organized around Seven (7) Goal statements. Goal 4 deals exclusively with Golden Gate City. Goal 1 ties the GOPs to the Land Use Designation Description Section and to the larger concepts within the GMP. Goals 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7 deal primarily with Golden Gate Estates, although there are Policies within these Goals and Objectives that apply to Golden Gate City as well. To provide more clarity, the following organizational recommendations are incorporated into Attachment A and Exhibit A to the Resolution: Goal 1 continues to provide an organizational 9.A.3.h Packet Pg. 486 Attachment: Transmittal_Staff Report (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Agenda Item 9 ‒ 4 ‒ CPSP-2018-2 / PL20180000261 Staff Proposed Golden Gate Area Master Plan Amendments framework, connecting the Plan concepts to Land Use Designation Descriptions, concurrency, aesthetics and natural resources. Golden Gate City Objectives and Policies now reside solely under Goal 2. Goals 3 through 7 now apply solely to Golden Gate Estates. Within Goals 3-7, some Objectives and Policies were reorganized. The existing and recommended Goals are summarized as follows: Goal # Existing Goal Recommended Goal 1 Relationship to Land Use Designation Description (LUDD) and global concepts Same as Existing 2 South Blocks (GGE south of I-75) Golden Gate City 3 Commercial Needs Golden Gate Estates - South Blocks 4 Golden Gate City Golden Gate Estates - Commercial Needs and NCs 5 Rural Character and Neighborhood Centers (NCs) Golden Gate Estates - Rural Character 6 Roadway Network Golden Gate Estates - Roadway Network 7 Emergency Services Golden Gate Estates - Emergency Services In addition to the re-order of Goals, the following Objective and Policy re-ordering was also incorporated without substantive change: • Recommended Policy 5.2.4, lighting standards, derives from current Objective 5.1.1. • Recommended Objective 7.1, transportation planning coordination with Emergency Services, derives from current Objective 6.3. • Recommended Objective 6.3, lime rock roads, was moved from current Policy 1.2.2. While the proposed GOPs now separate Golden Gate City from Golden Gate Estates, the Land Use Designation Descriptions continue to do so. That is, by their nature these discrete designations are geographically oriented, and remain divided between Urban Designation (Golden Gate City), Estates Designation, and the Rural Settlement Area. Exhibit A to the Resolution contains the proposed changes in a format required for transmittal and adoption, striking the entire GGAMP and replacing (underlined) with new text. To facilitate review of the substantive changes to the GGAMP, Attachment A to this memo is also provided: Material that is updated to reflect the recommendations derived from the White Paper appears as strikethrough/underlined in red font. It is hoped that this format will allow greater ease in public and CCPC review. 9.A.3.h Packet Pg. 487 Attachment: Transmittal_Staff Report (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Agenda Item 9 ‒ 5 ‒ CPSP-2018-2 / PL20180000261 Staff Proposed Golden Gate Area Master Plan Amendments Finally, for purposes of tracking the White Paper recommendations (in list form), the “List of Initial Recommendations” is repeated as Attachment C (labeled simply List of Recommendations) with cross-references to the locations of the language within proposed GGAMP. COORDINATION WITH OTHER GMP ELEMENTS: An evaluation of the recommended changes resulted in a need to amend other GMP elements for consistency and clear communication to the reader. Accordingly, there are several recommended amendments that are also packaged under Exhibit A, “Other GMP Amendments”. These Objectives, Policies or Land Use Designation Descriptions mirror the GGAMP recommended text. Each will require a separate Ordinance at adoption because they are separate elements within the GMP: (a) Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME). Single-family preserve standards, appearing in GGAMP Policy 1.3.2; also at CCME Policy 6.1.1. (b) Future Land Use Element (FLUE). Uses within Activity Center #15, appearing in GGAMP, Land Use Designation Description 1.B.1; also in FLUE Designation Description Section, Urban, C.1.2. (c) Public Facilities Element, Solid Waste Disposal Sub-element (SWD): Septage disposal system improvements, appearing in GGAMP Policy 5.3.8; also in SWD Policy 2.15. (d) Public Facilities Element, Stormwater Sub-element: Dispersed water management study, education and canal level of service in Policies 5.3.5, 5.3.6 and 5.3.7; also in Stormwater Sub-element Policies 5.4, 5.3 and 2.3. (e) Transportation Element. Everglades Blvd. maximum number of lanes, appearing in GGAMP Policy 6.1.3; also in Transportation Element Policy 10.3. RECONCILIATION WITH WHITE PAPER RECOMMENDATIONS: A list of recommendations made in the White Paper with references to proposed GGAMP changes is included as Attachment C. Some recommendations are directives, some are aspirational, and others direct the County to initiate studies within 2 years of adoption. A few were not carried over into the text or were further clarified for a variety of reasons. A list of those White Paper recommendations altered or excluded follows: 1. “Rightsizing” Neighborhood Centers (White Paper, pages 33-35). The community valued an avenue to add acreage to existing Neighborhood Centers to provide better function and economic viability, particularly where future road development, septic treatment or stormwater capture creates space constraints. The Golden Gate Estates Area Civic Association (GGEACA) had recommended a maximum of 80 acres within 4 quadrants, equating to 20 acres per quadrant. After further staff analysis, the maximum acreage was removed from the Master Plan language, in favor of criteria for consideration. Further, the reach of this amendment is confined to 2 quadrants at the intersection of Wilson and Golden Gate Boulevards, since those have established development footprints. The concern is that public might assume that 20 acres is a recommendation or safe harbor for a zoning application. 2. Immokalee Rd./Oaks Estates Interface (White Paper, page 35). Along this 16-parcel corridor, only five parcels are currently limited to residential use. The community had expressed general agreement with allowing C-1 uses as a future land use for these parcels. After additional staff analysis, it was determined that urban Estates residents were not polled regarding Conditional Uses at these locations, and there may have been insufficient attendance from residents in the immediate vicinity. Although applicants would 9.A.3.h Packet Pg. 488 Attachment: Transmittal_Staff Report (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Agenda Item 9 ‒ 6 ‒ CPSP-2018-2 / PL20180000261 Staff Proposed Golden Gate Area Master Plan Amendments still need public hearings to secure Conditional or C-1 uses, staff believes that GMP amendments should also be required, to assure market need and community support for linear CU and C-1 uses. 3. Transitional Conditional Use Acreage (White Paper, page 40). Similar to the site constraints at Neighborhood Centers, there were concerns expressed regarding buffers, roadway needs, septic drainfields, stormwater and ingress/egress. The White Paper recommended a maximum request, based on these factors, of 10 acres (from the current 5-acre maximum), but not as a guarantee. Staff reflects on the fact that previous restudies emphasized limited sized, rural establishments not exceeding 5-acres. Note, however, that a 75’ buffer adjacent to Estates Residential uses was added as a recommendation. 4. Conservation Collier Acquisitions (White Paper, page 66) Recommendations were made by the GGEACA to prioritize hydrological benefit as a review criterion on any Conservation Collier purchase within Golden Gate Estates. Staff defers this policy consideratio n to a more thorough review of the Conservation Collier mission and ordinance. 5. Adjacent Future Land Use Districts (White Paper, pages 41-42). One of the Board directives in studying the four area Subdistricts was coordination among them, including complementary land uses in adjoining areas. The public embraced the idea of special consideration in the LDC to create appropriate buffers between the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District (RFMUD), the Rural Lands Stewardship Area (RLSA) and Golden Ga te Estates. Staff will bring that concept forward, but believes the appropriate place for the LDC directive is within the RFMUD and RLSA provisions in the Future Land Use Element (FLUE). 6. Lime Rock Roads (White Paper, pages 49-50). Staff had recommended that the County provide a study on the acceleration of paving lime rock roads. The Master Plan language shifts away from a study to simply an annual budget determination, based on cost/benefit analysis. This is consistent with the Board’s recent efforts to increase budgeting based on these factors. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: The Board should consider the following criteria in making its decision: “plan amendments shall be based on relevant and appropriate data and an analysis by the local government that may include but not be limited to, surveys, studies, community goals and vision, and other data available at the time of adoption of the plan amendment. To be based on data means to react to it in an appropriate way and to the extent necessary indicated by the data available on that particular subject at the time of adoption of the plan or plan amendment at issue.” 163.3177(1)(f), FS The County Attorney’s office reviewed the staff report on June 22, 2018. [HFAC] STAFF RECOMMENDATION That the Collier County Planning Commission, acting as the Land Planning Agency and the Environmental Advisory Council, forward the proposed GGAMP restudy amendments to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation to Transmit to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity. [REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] 9.A.3.h Packet Pg. 489 Attachment: Transmittal_Staff Report (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 9.A.3.h Packet Pg. 490 Attachment: Transmittal_Staff Report (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed GMP Amendments Draft Golden Gate Area Master Plan – BCC Transmittal 07/20/2018 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 1 | P a g e Words underlined are added, words double underline are added as CCPC recommendations, words struck through are deleted, words double struck through are deleted as CCPC recommendations. GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN To update and reorganize the current Golden Gate Area Master Plan, along with the title, heading and Future Land Use Map series. COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN Prepared by Collier County Planning and Zoning Division Department Comprehensive Planning Section Prepared for COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Adopted October 1997 9.A.3.i Packet Pg. 491 Attachment: Transmittal_Staff Report_Attchmnt_A (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed GMP Amendments Draft Golden Gate Area Master Plan – BCC Transmittal 07/20/2018 2 | P a g e Words underlined are added, words double underline are added as CCPC recommendations, words struck through are deleted, words double struck through are deleted as CCPC recommendations. AMENDMENTS TO COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN SYMBOL DATE AMENDED ORDINANCE NO. The parenthesized Roman numeral symbols enumerated above appear throughout this Element and provide informational citations to adopted documents recorded in the Official Records of Collier County, as required by Florida law. These symbols are for informational purposes only, meant to mark entries amended after the 1997 adoption of the full Element and typically found in the margins of this document, but are not themselves adopted. * Indicates adopted portions ** Ordinance No. 2000-25 rescinded and repealed in its entirety Collier County Ordinance No. 99-63, which had the effect of rescinding certain EAR-based (1996 EAR) objectives and policies at issue in Administration Commission Case No. ACC-99-02 (DOAH Case No. 98-0324GM). May 9, 2000 2000-25 ** May 9, 2000 2000-26 *** (I) May 9, 2000 2000-27 (II) May 9, 2000 2000-28 (III) May 9, 2000 2000-29 (IV) March 13, 2001 2001-12 (V) May 14, 2002 2002-24 (VI) September 10, 2003 2003-44 (VII) December 16, 2003 2003-67 (VIII) October 26, 2004 2004-71 (IX) June 7, 2005 2005-25 (X) January 25, 2007 2007-19 (XI) December 4, 2007 2007-76 (XII) December 4, 2007 2007-77 (XIII) December 4, 2007 2007-83 (XIV) October 14, 2008 2008-55 (XV) October 14, 2008 2008-56 (XVI) October 14, 2008 2008-59 (XVII) July 28, 2010 2010-31 (XVIII) July 28, 2010 2010-32 (XIX) September 14, 2011 2011-29 (XX) January 9, 2013 2013-15 (XXI) November 18, 2014 2014-41 (XXII) November 10, 2015 2015-62 (XXIII) May 10, 2016 2016-12 (XXIV) June 13, 2017 2017-23 9.A.3.i Packet Pg. 492 Attachment: Transmittal_Staff Report_Attchmnt_A (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed GMP Amendments Draft Golden Gate Area Master Plan – BCC Transmittal 07/20/2018 3 | P a g e Words underlined are added, words double underline are added as CCPC recommendations, words struck through are deleted, words double struck through are deleted as CCPC recommendations. *** Ordinance No. 2000-26 amended Ordinance No. 89-05, as amended, the Collier County Growth Management Plan, having the effect of rescinding certain EAR-based (1996 EAR) objectives and policies at issue in Administration Commission Case No. ACC-99-02 (DOAH Case No. 98-0324GM), more specifically portions of the Intergovernmental Coordination Element (Ord. No. 98-56), Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge (Ord. No. 97-59) and Drainage (Ord. No. 97-61) sub-elements of the Public Facilities Element, Housing Element (Ord. No. 97-63), Golden Gate Area Master Plan (Ord. No. 97-64), Conservation and Coastal Management Element (Ord. No. 97-66), and the Future Land Use Element and Future Land Use Map (Ord. No. 97-67); and readopting Policy 2.2.3 of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan. • The above Ordinance No. 2007-19 is based on the 2004 Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR). • The above Ordinance No. 2013-15 is based on the 2011 Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR). 9.A.3.i Packet Pg. 493 Attachment: Transmittal_Staff Report_Attchmnt_A (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed GMP Amendments Draft Golden Gate Area Master Plan – BCC Transmittal 07/20/2018 4 | P a g e Words underlined are added, words double underline are added as CCPC recommendations, words struck through are deleted, words double struck through are deleted as CCPC recommendations. AMENDMENTS TO COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN – prior to 2000 GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN DATE AMENDED ORDINANCE NO. May 19, 1992 92-34 August 4, 1992 92-50 May 25, 1993 93-24 April 12, 1994 94-22 March 14, 1995 95-12 April 14, 1998 98-26 September 8, 1998 98-70 February 23, 1999 99-17 Note: All of the above amendments occurred after adoption of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan in 1991 (Ord. No. 91-15) and prior to adoption of amendments in 1997 that were subsequently re-adopted in 2000. These amendments are no longer denoted on the pages of the Element with Roman numeral symbols. 9.A.3.i Packet Pg. 494 Attachment: Transmittal_Staff Report_Attchmnt_A (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed GMP Amendments Draft Golden Gate Area Master Plan – BCC Transmittal 07/20/2018 5 | P a g e Words underlined are added, words double underline are added as CCPC recommendations, words struck through are deleted, words double struck through are deleted as CCPC recommendations. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. INTRODUCTION 1 II. OVERVIEW 2 A. County-Wide Planning Process B. Golden Gate Area Planning Process * III. IMPLEMENTATION SECTION 3 A. Goals, Objectives and Policies 3 B. Land Use Designation Description Section 13 1. Urban 13 2. Estates 21 3. Agricultural/Rural Settlement Area 45 4. Overlays and Special Features 45 * LIST OF MAPS 46 Golden Gate Area Master Plan Study Areas Golden Gate Area Future Land Use Golden Gate City Future Land Use High Density Residential Subdistrict 1989 Boundaries of Activity Centers Downtown Center Commercial Subdistrict Urban Mixed Use Activity Centers Golden Gate Parkway and Coronado Parkway Golden Gate Urban Commercial Infill Subdistrict and Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict Santa Barbara Commercial Subdistrict Golden Gate Parkway Professional Office Commercial Subdistrict Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict Pine Ridge Road (CR 896) ‒ Interchange Activity Center and Pine Ridge Road Mixed Use Subdistrict Golden Gate Estates Neighborhood Centers Wilson Boulevard/Golden Gate Boulevard Center Collier Boulevard/Pine Ridge Road Center Golden Gate Boulevard/Everglades Boulevard Center Immokalee Road/Everglades Boulevard Center Randall Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict Commercial Western Estates Infill Subdistrict Golden Gate Parkway Interchange Conditional Uses Area Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict Mission Subdistrict Estates Shopping Center Subdistrict Estates Shopping Center Subdistrict Conceptual Plan Everglades – Randall Subdistrict Southbrooke Office Subdistrict Conditional Uses Subdistrict: Golden Gate Parkway Special Provisions Special Exceptions to Conditional Use in Golden Gate Estates 9.A.3.i Packet Pg. 495 Attachment: Transmittal_Staff Report_Attchmnt_A (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed GMP Amendments Draft Golden Gate Area Master Plan – BCC Transmittal 07/20/2018 6 | P a g e Words underlined are added, words double underline are added as CCPC recommendations, words struck through are deleted, words double struck through are deleted as CCPC recommendations. Immokalee Road/Randall Boulevard Planning Study Area 9.A.3.i Packet Pg. 496 Attachment: Transmittal_Staff Report_Attchmnt_A (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed GMP Amendments Draft Golden Gate Area Master Plan – BCC Transmittal 07/20/2018 7 | P a g e Words underlined are added, words double underline are added as CCPC recommendations, words struck through are deleted, words double struck through are deleted as CCPC recommendations. I. INTRODUCTION 1 As part of the revised Growth Management Plan, the County adopted the original Golden Gate 2 Area Master Plan (GGAMP) in 1991. The GGAMP was further revised in 1997. The Golden Gate 3 Area Master Plan provides growth management regulations for the designated Golden Gate Area 4 (see original Golden Gate Area Master Plan Study Areas Map). 5 The Golden Gate Area was previously subject to the regulations outlined in the County's Future 6 Land Use Element (FLUE). However, in 1991, the unique characteristics of the area resulted in 7 adoption of a Master Plan for Golden Gate, as a separate Element of the Collier County Growth 8 Management Plan. This Master Plan superseded former Objective 1, Policy 1.1, and Policy 1.3 9 of the FLUE. All other Goals, Objectives, and Policies contained in the FLUE and all other 10 Elements of the Growth Management Plan remain applicable to the Golden Gate Area. In 11 addition, the Golden Gate Area Future Land Use Map will be used instead of the County-Wide 12 Future Land Use Map. 13 In April 1996, the Board of County Commissioners adopted the Evaluation and Appraisal Report 14 (EAR) for Collier County. As a result of the recommendations made in the EAR, Ordinance 91-15 15, which adopted the original Golden Gate Area Master Plan, was repealed and a new Ordinance 16 97-64 was adopted. 17 In February of 2001, the Board of County Commissioners directed staff to initiate a restudy of the 18 Golden Gate Area Master Plan. Accordingly, in June of 2001, Comprehensive Planning Section 19 Staff requested that the Board appoint an advisory committee, consisting of residents of Golden 20 Gate City and Golden Gate Estates, to aid Staff in the restudy process. The Golden Gate Area 21 Master Plan Restudy Committee met on over twenty (20) occasions, between June 2001 and 22 June 2003, to consider proposed amendments to the GGAMP, as well as other matters related to 23 the Golden Gate Area. All meetings were open to the public; many of these meetings were well 24 attended. 25 The restudy process was divided into two phases. The County transmitted Phase I amendments 26 to the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA) in April 2003. These amendments were 27 adopted, as Ordinance 2003-44, in September 2003. Phase II amendments were transmitted in 28 June 2004. The Phase II amendments were adopted in October 2004, as Ordinance 2004-71. 29 In February 2015, the Board of County Commissioners directed staff to initiate another restudy of 30 the GGAMP. Staff evaluated the Golden Gate Area within 3 distinct areas: 1) Golden Gate City, 31 2) Golden Gate Eastern Rural Estates, defined as the Estates area east of Collier Boulevard; and 32 3) Golden Gate Western Urban Estates, defined as the Estates area west of Collier Boulevard. 33 Guided by an Oversight Committee, staff conducted eight public workshops along with electronic 34 outreach to gather resident and stakeholder opinions. Most fundamentally, the vision statements 35 created by consensus within the sub-areas of the Golden Gate Area are as follows: 36 Golden Gate City Vision Statement: 37 Golden Gate City is a safe, diverse, family-oriented community that offers easy access to 38 education, parks, shopping and services within a vibrant, walkable community. 39 Golden Gate Eastern Rural Estates Vision Statement: 40 The Golden Gate Eastern Rural Estates is an interconnected, low-density residential community 41 with limited goods and services in neighborhood centers, defined by rural character with 42 appreciation for nature and quiet surroundings. 43 44 9.A.3.i Packet Pg. 497 Attachment: Transmittal_Staff Report_Attchmnt_A (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed GMP Amendments Draft Golden Gate Area Master Plan – BCC Transmittal 07/20/2018 8 | P a g e Words underlined are added, words double underline are added as CCPC recommendations, words struck through are deleted, words double struck through are deleted as CCPC recommendations. Golden Gate Western Urban Estates Vision Statement: 1 Golden Gate Western Urban Estates is a low-density, large-lot residential neighborhood in a 2 natural setting with convenient access to the coastal area. 3 This plan includes three major sections: 4 The OVERVIEW section provides an introduction to Countywide and Golden Gate Area planning 5 efforts. 6 The IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY places the Plan into effect. Strategies have been developed 7 to address land use, public facilities, transportation, rural character, emergency management and 8 natural resources. This section also includes the Goals, Objectives, and Policies, the Golden 9 Gate Area Future Land Use Map and the Land Use Designation Description Section. The Goals, 10 Objectives and Policies include Goal 2, which deals solely with Golden Gate City. Because the 11 visions and opinions of Estates residents were similar in the Eastern Rural and Western Urban 12 Estates areas, both areas of Golden Gate Estates are covered together in Goals 3-7. 13 The SUPPORT DOCUMENT outlines data and information used to develop the Implementation 14 strategy, including the Goals, Objectives, and Policies. 15 9.A.3.i Packet Pg. 498 Attachment: Transmittal_Staff Report_Attchmnt_A (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed GMP Amendments Draft Golden Gate Area Master Plan – BCC Transmittal 07/20/2018 9 | P a g e Words underlined are added, words double underline are added as CCPC recommendations, words struck through are deleted, words double struck through are deleted as CCPC recommendations. II. OVERVIEW 1 A. COUNTY-WIDE PLANNING PROCESS 2 Pursuant to Section 163.3177(6), Florida Statutes, the Collier County Growth Management Plan 3 shall contain the following elements: 4 1. Future Land Use 5 2. Housing 6 3. Public Facilities 7 4. Conservation and Coastal Management (Coastal Counties only) 8 5. Intergovernmental Coordination 9 6. Capital Improvements 10 7. Transportation 11 8. Recreation and Open Space 12 In addition to the above Elements, local government comprehensive plans in Florida may, by 13 decision of the local legislative body, contain one or more optional elements. Optional elements 14 are required to comply with certain general criteria under Section 163.3177, Florida Statutes, but 15 are not subject to specific requirements (with some exceptions). In 1991, the Board of County 16 Commissioners chose the option of adopting the Golden Gate Area Master Plan, in recognition of 17 the unique characteristics of the Golden Gate Area. 18 In addition to establishing the Collier County Growth Management Plan’s mandatory structure, 19 Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, also subjects the Plan to a mandatory evaluation process every 20 seven (7) years. This process involves the preparation of an Evaluation and Appraisal Review 21 (EAR) to determine whether, and to what extent, the existing Growth Management Plan has 22 carried out its stated Goals, Objectives and Policies. 23 B. GOLDEN GATE AREA PLANNING PROCESS 24 Objective 4 of the Collier County Future Land Use Element (FLUE) allows the countywide 25 planning process to “address specific geographic or issue areas.” Policy 4.1 of this Objective 26 reads as follows: 27 “A detailed Master Plan for Golden Gate Estates has been developed and was incorporated 28 into this Growth Management Plan in February 1991. The Master Plan addresses Natural 29 Resources, Future Land Use, Water Management, Public Facilities and other considerations.” 30 In February 1991, the Board of County Commissioners adopted the original Golden Gate Area 31 Master Plan. The original Master Plan incorporated the recommendations of a Citizens Steering 32 Committee. A revised and updated Master Plan was adopted in 1997, pursuant to 33 recommendations of the County’s 1996 Evaluation and Appraisal Report. In 2001, the Board of 34 County Commissioners established the Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy Committee and 35 directed Staff to work with the Committee to further revise and update the Master Plan. The Board 36 of County Commissioners adopted revisions to the GGAMP, incorporating the recommendations 37 of the Restudy Committee, in 2003 and 2004. 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 9.A.3.i Packet Pg. 499 Attachment: Transmittal_Staff Report_Attchmnt_A (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed GMP Amendments Draft Golden Gate Area Master Plan – BCC Transmittal 07/20/2018 10 | P a g e Words underlined are added, words double underline are added as CCPC recommendations, words struck through are deleted, words double struck through are deleted as CCPC recommendations. III. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY 1 This section places the plan into effect. Implementation strategies include the Goals, Objectives 2 and Policies, and the Land Use Designation Description Section. 3 A. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES 4 GOAL 1: GOLDEN GATE CITY AND GOLDEN GATE ESTATES 5 TO GUIDE LAND USE AND PUBLIC FACILITY DECISION MAKING AND TO BALANCE THE 6 NEED TO PROVIDE BASIC SERVICES WITH NATURAL RESOURCE CONCERNS THROUGH 7 A WELL PLANNED MIX OF COMPATIBLE LAND USES WHICH ENSURE THE HEALTH, 8 SAFETY, WELFARE, AND QUALITY OF LIFE OF THE LOCAL RESIDENTS. 9 10 OBJECTIVE 1.1: 11 Develop new or revised uses of land consistent with designations outlined on the Golden Gate 12 Area Future Land Use Map and provisions found in the Land Use Designation Description Section 13 of this Element. 14 15 Policy 1.1.1: 16 The Policies under the above Objective shall identify the Future Land Use Designations, Districts, 17 and Subdistricts for the Golden Gate Area. 18 19 Policy 1.1.2: 20 The Land Use Designation Description Section of this Element shall provide the standards and 21 permitted uses for Golden Gate Area Future Land Use Districts and Subdistricts. 22 23 Policy 1.1.3: 24 The Golden Gate Area Future Land Use Map and companion Future Land Use Designations, 25 Districts, and Subdistricts shall be binding on all development orders unless otherwise permitted 26 in this Master Plan effective with the adoption of this Master Plan. 27 28 Policy 1.1.4: 29 The URBAN Future Land Use Designation shall include Future Land Use Districts and 30 Subdistricts for: 31 A. URBAN ‒ MIXED USE DISTRICT 32 1. Urban Residential Subdistrict 33 2. High Density Residential Subdistrict 34 3. Downtown Center Commercial Subdistrict 35 B. URBAN ‒ COMMERCIAL DISTRICT 36 1. Mixed Use Activity Center Subdistrict 37 2. Golden Gate Urban Commercial Infill Subdistrict 38 3. Santa Barbara Commercial Subdistrict 39 4. Golden Gate Parkway Professional Office Commercial Subdistrict 40 5. Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict 41 42 43 44 45 9.A.3.i Packet Pg. 500 Attachment: Transmittal_Staff Report_Attchmnt_A (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed GMP Amendments Draft Golden Gate Area Master Plan – BCC Transmittal 07/20/2018 11 | P a g e Words underlined are added, words double underline are added as CCPC recommendations, words struck through are deleted, words double struck through are deleted as CCPC recommendations. Policy 1.1.5: 1 The ESTATES Future Land Use Designation shall include Future Land Use Districts and 2 Subdistricts for: 3 A. ESTATES – MIXED USE DISTRICT 4 1. Residential Estates Subdistrict 5 2. Neighborhood Center Subdistrict 6 3. Conditional Uses Subdistrict 7 4. Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict 8 5. Mission Subdistrict 9 6. Everglades – Randall Subdistrict 10 B. ESTATES – COMMERCIAL DISTRICT 11 1. Interchange Activity Center Subdistrict 12 2. Pine Ridge Road Mixed Use Subdistrict 13 3. Randall Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict 14 4. Commercial Western Estates Infill Subdistrict 15 5. Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict 16 6. Estates Shopping Center Subdistrict 17 7. Southbrooke Office Subdistrict 18 19 Policy 1.1.6: 20 The AGRICULTURAL/RURAL Future Land Use Designation shall include the following Future 21 Land Use District: 22 A. RURAL SETTLEMENT AREA DISTRICT 23 24 Policy 1.1.7: 25 Overlays and Special Features shall include: 26 A. Southern Golden Gate Estates Natural Resource Protection Overlay 27 28 Policy 1.1.8: 29 Conditional Use requests within Golden Gate Estates shall adhere to the guidelines outlined in 30 the Conditional Uses Subdistrict. 31 32 Policy 1.1.9: 33 To obtain Conditional Use approval, a super majority vote (minimum of 4 votes) by the Board of 34 Zoning Appeals shall be required. 35 36 Policy 1.1.10: 37 No development orders shall be issued inconsistent with the Golden Gate Master Plan with the 38 exception of those unimproved properties granted a positive determination through the Zoning 39 Re-evaluation Program and identified on the Future Land Use Map Series as properties 40 consistent by Policy and those development orders issued pursuant to conditional uses and 41 rezones approved based on the County-Wide Future Land Use Element (adopted January 10, 42 1989, Ordinance 89-05) which was in effect at the time of approval. Any subsequent development 43 9.A.3.i Packet Pg. 501 Attachment: Transmittal_Staff Report_Attchmnt_A (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed GMP Amendments Draft Golden Gate Area Master Plan – BCC Transmittal 07/20/2018 12 | P a g e Words underlined are added, words double underline are added as CCPC recommendations, words struck through are deleted, words double struck through are deleted as CCPC recommendations. orders shall also be reviewed for consistency with the Growth Management Plan based on the 1 County-Wide Future Land Use Element. 2 3 Policy 1.1.11: 4 The sites containing existing public educational plants and ancillary plants, and the undeveloped 5 sites owned by the Collier County School Board for future public educational plants and ancillary 6 plants, within the GGAMP area, are depicted on the Future Land Use Map Series in the 7 countywide FLUE and on the Public School Facilities Element Map Series, and referenced in 8 FLUE Policy 5.14 and Intergovernmental Coordination Element Policy 1.2.6. All of these sites are 9 subject to the general Interlocal Agreement, adopted on May 15, 2003 by the Collier County 10 School Board and on May 27, 2003 by the Board of County Commissioners, and as subsequently 11 amended and restated, with an effective date of December 2008, and subject to the implementing 12 land development regulations to be adopted; and, shall be subject to the School Board Review 13 (SBR) Interlocal Agreement, adopted on May 15, 2003 by the Collier County School Board and 14 on May 27, 2003 by the Board of County Commissioners, and subject to the implementing land 15 development regulations. All future educational plants and ancillary plants shall be allowed in 16 zoning districts as set forth in FLUE Policy 5.14. 17 18 OBJECTIVE 1.2: 19 Ensure public facilities are provided at an acceptable level of service. 20 21 Policy 1.2.1: 22 Requests for new uses of land shall be subject to level of service standards and concurrency 23 requirements for public facilities as outlined in the Capital Improvement Element of the Growth 24 Management Plan. 25 26 Policy 1.2.2: 27 The Collier County Transportation Department shall continue to explore alternative financing 28 methods to accelerate paving of lime-rock roads in the Estates. 29 30 Policy 1.2.3: 31 Consistent with Chapter 89-169, Florida Administrative Code, the Florida Governmental Utilities 32 Authority, or its successor, shall provide updated water and sewer service data to the Collier 33 County Water and Wastewater Authority on an annual basis. 34 35 Policy 1.2.4: 36 Due to the continued use of individual septic systems and private wells within a densely platted 37 urban area, the Florida Governmental Utilities Authority, or its successor, is encouraged to expand 38 their sewer and water service area to include all of that area known as Golden Gate City at the 39 earliest possible time. 40 41 OBJECTIVE 1.3: 42 Protect and preserve the valuable natural resources within the Golden Gate area. 43 44 Policy 1.3.1: 45 The County shall protect and preserve natural resources within the Golden Gate area in 46 accordance with the Objectives and Policies contained within Goals 6 and 7 of the Collier County 47 Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME). 48 49 50 9.A.3.i Packet Pg. 502 Attachment: Transmittal_Staff Report_Attchmnt_A (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed GMP Amendments Draft Golden Gate Area Master Plan – BCC Transmittal 07/20/2018 13 | P a g e Words underlined are added, words double underline are added as CCPC recommendations, words struck through are deleted, words double struck through are deleted as CCPC recommendations. Policy 1.3.2: 1 As provided for in CCME Policy 6.1.1, the subdivision of tracts up to 13 acres in size and 2 designated Residential Estates Subdistrict shall not trigger preserve requirements. 3 4 Policy 1.3.3: 5 The Collier County Environmental Services Department shall coordinate its planning and 6 permitting activities within the Golden Gate Area with all other applicable environmental planning, 7 permitting and regulatory agencies to ensure that all Federal, State and local natural resource 8 protection regulations are being enforced. 9 10 OBJECTIVE 1.4: 11 Provide a living environment within the Golden Gate Area, which is aesthetically acceptable and 12 protects the quality of life. 13 14 Policy 1.4.1: 15 Collier County shall provide a living environment that is aesthetically acceptable and protects the 16 quality of life through the enforcement of applicable codes and laws. 17 18 Policy 1.4.2: 19 The County's Code Enforcement Board shall strictly enforce the Land Development Code and 20 other applicable codes and laws to control the illegal storage of machinery, vehicles and junk, and 21 the illegal operation of commercial activities within the Golden Gate Area. 22 23 GOAL 2: GOLDEN GATE CITY 24 TO PRESERVE AND ENHANCE A MIX OF RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL LAND USES 25 WITHIN GOLDEN GATE CITY THAT PROVIDES FOR THE BASIC NEEDS OF BOTH THE 26 LOCAL RESIDENTS AND THE RESIDENTS OF THE SURROUNDING AREA AND TO 27 CONTINUALLY IMPROVE TRANSPORATION AND SAFETY SERVICES CREATES A SAFE, 28 DIVERSE AND VIBRANT WALKABLE COMMUNTY CONSISTENT WITH THE STATED 29 VISION OF GOLDEN GATE CITY. 30 31 OBJECTIVE 2.1: 32 Provide for residential and commercial land uses that meet the needs of Golden Gate City and 33 the surrounding area. 34 35 Policy 2.1.1: 36 Development and redevelopment within Golden Gate City shall be guided by the residential and 37 commercial needs consistent with the stated vision of Golden Gate City. 38 39 Policy 2.1.2: 40 The County shall protect established stable neighborhoods and provide opportunity for 41 redevelopment and renewal through development standards and practices that promote 42 compatibility. 43 44 Policy 2.1.3 45 Within two years, Collier County shall create development standards to guide the transformation 46 of Golden Gate Parkway and the Activity Center into destinations that are convenient, pleasant 47 and safe for pedestrians and cyclists, and maintain strong connections to transit service. 48 49 50 9.A.3.i Packet Pg. 503 Attachment: Transmittal_Staff Report_Attchmnt_A (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed GMP Amendments Draft Golden Gate Area Master Plan – BCC Transmittal 07/20/2018 14 | P a g e Words underlined are added, words double underline are added as CCPC recommendations, words struck through are deleted, words double struck through are deleted as CCPC recommendations. Policy 2.1.4 1 The Activity Center shall allow uses intended to strengthen the economic health of Golden Gate 2 City. 3 4 Policy 2.1.5 5 Collier County shall discourage new land uses along Golden Gate Parkway and within the Activity 6 Center that impede pedestrian activity and are solely auto-oriented, such as car washes, storage 7 facilities, auto dealerships and drive throughs. Land development regulations will be established 8 within two years to ensure compatibility of auto-oriented uses within the pedestrian environment. 9 10 Policy 2.1.6 11 Residential land use designations shall support the diversity of housing types within Golden Gate 12 City. 13 14 Policy 2.1.7: 15 Collier County shall respond to community-initiated develop an implementation schedule for the 16 creation of a planning programs as they may occur. The implementation schedule shall 17 Community planning programs may take into consideration the following issues: 18 A. Affordable housing based upon home ownership; 19 B. Commercial re-vitalization, to include: 20 1. Sidewalks 21 2. Traffic calming measures 22 3. Improved street lighting; 23 C. Neighborhood parks, open space and recreational centers; 24 D. Crime reduction; 25 E. Consistent enforcement of land development regulations; and, 26 F. Improved lighting for streets and parking areas. 27 28 OBJECTIVE 2.2: 29 Strengthen the quality of life in Golden Gate City and the surrounding area and promote a healthy 30 economy through support of redevelopment and renewal in Golden Gate City with focus along 31 Golden Gate Parkway and within the designated Activity Center. 32 33 Policy 2.2.1 34 Collier County shall consider the use of redevelopment tools such as tax increment financing. 35 36 Policy 2.2.2 37 Within two years of adoption, Collier County shall initiate a community renewal plan to include 38 economic development strategies, urban design schemes, and infrastructure improvements. 39 Renewal plans shall be in concert with the vision of Golden Gate City and promote vibrant 40 urbanism, improve aesthetics and support walkability. 41 42 Policy 2.2.3 43 Within two years of adoption, Collier County shall initiate the involvement of Golden Gate City 44 residents and business owners to consider amendments to the Land Development Code to 45 support and implement residential and commercial redevelopment and renewal initiatives. 46 Amendments shall include incentives for remodeling and renovation by creating criteria and 47 standards for variances and/or deviations. 48 9.A.3.i Packet Pg. 504 Attachment: Transmittal_Staff Report_Attchmnt_A (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed GMP Amendments Draft Golden Gate Area Master Plan – BCC Transmittal 07/20/2018 15 | P a g e Words underlined are added, words double underline are added as CCPC recommendations, words struck through are deleted, words double struck through are deleted as CCPC recommendations. 1 Policy 2.2.4 2 In collaboration with the Golden Gate City residents and business owners, and other community 3 partners such as the Greater Naples Chamber of Commerce, Collier County shall initiate a 4 branding and marketing plan for Golden Gate City within two years of adoption. The proposed 5 plan shall be in concert with the overall vision for Golden Gate City. 6 7 Policy 2.2.5 8 Collier County will work to ensure pertinent economic incentive programs are made available to 9 those seeking business creation and redevelopment opportunities. 10 11 OBJECTIVE 2.3 12 Ensure Golden Gate City public facilities are provided at an acceptable level of service, planned 13 and implemented in concert with the vision of Golden Gate City. 14 15 Policy 2.3.1 16 Due to the continued use of individual septic systems and private wells within a densely platted 17 urban area, Collier County Public Utilities will expand sewer and water service in accordance with 18 the Implementation Report attached as Appendix A to Resolution No. 2017-222. Expansion plans 19 shall consider the renewal areas of Golden Gate Parkway and the area surrounding the Activity 20 Center a priority for expansion and shall coordinate its projects with scheduled road and/or 21 stormwater improvements to maximize efficiency and minimize disruption to businesses and 22 residents. 23 24 Policy 2.3.2 25 Collier County will support all transportation needs within Golden Gate City with an emphasis on 26 walkability. Walkability will be improved through the implementation of the recommendations of 27 the Metropolitan Planning Organization’s Walkability Study. 28 29 Policy 2.3.3 30 Redevelopment within the Activity Center shall maintain multiple access points to the surrounding 31 neighborhoods and through the Activity Center while providing safe and direct access to transit 32 stops within or adjacent to the Activity Center. 33 34 Policy 2.3.4 35 Alleys in Golden Gate City may only be vacated if such vacation does not prevent reasonable 36 connection and continuity for future pedestrian, non-motorized and transit trips. Within 1 year of 37 adoption, Resolution 2013-166 shall be amended to implement this policy. 38 39 Policy 2.3.5 40 To ensure a safe and pleasant pedestrian environment, Collier County shall periodically conduct 41 speed studies in Golden Gate City. When appropriate, traffic calming measures and speed limit 42 reductions may be implemented. 43 44 GOAL 3: GOLDEN GATE ESTATES 45 TO RECOGNIZE THAT THE AREA WHICH LIES SOUTH OF INTERSTATE 75 (ALLIGATOR 46 ALLEY) TO US 41 (TAMIAMI TRAIL) IS AN AREA OF SPECIAL ENVIRONMENTAL 47 SENSITIVITY AND IS BIOLOGICALLY AND HYDROLOGICALLY IMPORTANT THROUGH 48 PARTICIPATION IN THE PICAYUNE STRAND RESTORATION PROJECT AS PART OF THE 49 FEDERAL SAVE OUR EVERGLADES PROGRAM. BASED UPON SUCH CONDITIONS, THE 50 9.A.3.i Packet Pg. 505 Attachment: Transmittal_Staff Report_Attchmnt_A (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed GMP Amendments Draft Golden Gate Area Master Plan – BCC Transmittal 07/20/2018 16 | P a g e Words underlined are added, words double underline are added as CCPC recommendations, words struck through are deleted, words double struck through are deleted as CCPC recommendations. STATE HAS ACQUIRED OWNERSHIP OF ALL LANDS WITHIN THE SOUTHERN GOLDEN 1 GATE ESTATES (SGGE) PICAYUNE STRAND RESTORATION PROJECT AREA. 2 3 GOAL 4: GOLDEN GATE ESTATES 4 TO PROVIDE FOR LIMITED BASIC COMMERCIAL SERVICES AND CONDITIONAL USES 5 FOR PURPOSES OF SERVING THE RURAL NEEDS OF GOLDEN GATE ESTATES 6 RESIDENTS, SHORTENING VEHICULAR TRIPS, AND PRESERVING RURAL CHARACTER. 7 8 OBJECTIVE 4.1: 9 Meet the locational and rural design criteria contained within the Estates Designation, Estates-10 Mixed Use District, Neighborhood Center Subdistrict and Conditional Use Subdistrict of this 11 Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element, of the Collier County Growth Management Plan when 12 considering the placement and designation of Neighborhood Centers and Conditional Uses within 13 Golden Gate Estates. 14 15 Policy 4.1.1: 16 Neighborhood Centers within Golden Gate Estates shall be subject to the locational and rural 17 design criteria established within the Estates Designation, Estates – Mixed Use District, 18 Neighborhood Center Subdistrict of this Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element, of the Collier 19 County Growth Management Plan. 20 21 Policy 4.1.2: 22 Conditional Uses within Golden Gate Estates shall be subject to locational and dimensional 23 criteria established within the Conditional Use Subdistrict in the Land Use Designation Description 24 section of this Golden Gate Area Master Plan. 25 26 OBJECTIVE 4.2: 27 Provide for new commercial development within Neighborhood Centers or and other future 28 Commercial Land Use Designations. 29 30 Policy 4.2.1: 31 Within 1 year of the completion of the Randall Blvd. and Oil Well Rd. Corridor study, the County 32 Manager or designee shall initiate an evaluation of the future land uses along Immokalee Rd. in 33 the vicinity of Randall Blvd., Oil Well Rd. and Wilson Blvd. (as generally shown on the Immokalee 34 Rd./Randall Blvd. Planning Study Area Map) and make recommendations to the Board of County 35 Commissioners for any proposed changes to the future land uses. 36 37 GOAL 5: GOLDEN GATE ESTATES 38 TO BALANCE THE DESIRE BY RESIDENTS FOR URBAN AMENITIES WITHIN GOLDEN 39 GATE ESTATES WITH THE PRESERVEVATION OF THE AREA’S RURAL CHARACTER, AS 40 DEFINED BY LARGE WOODED LOTS, THE KEEPING OF LIVESTOCK, THE ABILITY TO 41 GROW CROPS, WILDLIFE ACTIVITY, ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP, LOW-DENSITY 42 RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, AND LIMITATIONS ON COMMERCIAL AND CONDITIONAL 43 USES. 44 45 OBJECTIVE 5.1: 46 Balance the provision of public infrastructure with the need to preserve the rural character of 47 Golden Gate Estates. 48 49 50 9.A.3.i Packet Pg. 506 Attachment: Transmittal_Staff Report_Attchmnt_A (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed GMP Amendments Draft Golden Gate Area Master Plan – BCC Transmittal 07/20/2018 17 | P a g e Words underlined are added, words double underline are added as CCPC recommendations, words struck through are deleted, words double struck through are deleted as CCPC recommendations. Policy 5.1.1: 1 Future road and bridge improvements in Golden Gate Estates shall not only provide for safety 2 and reasonable mobility but shall also contribute to the rural character of the area. Transportation 3 improvements shall be designed in context with their setting. 4 5 Policy 5.1.2 6 The County shall initiate architectural standard requirements in the Land Development Code 7 within two years of adoption that apply to commercial, conditional use and essential services 8 facilities, reflecting the rural character of the Estates area and providing coherence and area 9 identity. 10 11 Policy 5.1.3: 12 The Collier County Parks and Recreation Department Manager or designee shall create a public 13 network of greenway corridors within Golden Gate Estates that interconnects public lands and 14 permanently protected green space. The greenway network shall consist of interconnected trails 15 and paths which that allow people to move about the Estates area by means other than motorized 16 vehicles. All greenways shall be constructed within or abutting existing or future public easements 17 or rights-of-way. In creating the greenway network, the County shall not employ eminent domain 18 proceedings. 19 20 Policy 5.1.4: 21 Recognizing the residential nature of the land uses surrounding the I-75 interchange at Golden 22 Gate Parkway, as well as the restrictions on conditional uses of the Conditional Uses Subdistrict 23 of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan, there shall be no further commercial zoning for properties 24 abutting Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. No new 25 commercial uses shall be permitted on properties abutting streets accessing Golden Gate 26 Parkway within the above-defined segment. This policy shall not apply to that existing portion of 27 the Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict, which is located at the northwest corner of 28 the intersection of Golden Gate Parkway and Santa Barbara Boulevard. 29 30 OBJECTIVE 5.2: 31 Provide for the protection of the rural character of Golden Gate Estates. 32 33 Policy 5.2.1: 34 Rural character protection provisions shall provide for the preservation of such rural amenities as, 35 but not limited to, wooded lots, the keeping of livestock, the ability to grow crops, wildlife activity, 36 and low-density residential development. 37 38 Policy 5.2.2: 39 The growing of food crops and/or the keeping of livestock on properties within Golden Gate 40 Estates shall be permitted, provided that such activities are conducted according to the Land 41 Development Code. 42 43 Policy 5.2.3: 44 Rural character shall be further protected by resisting site-specific Master Plan changes that are 45 out of scale or character with the rural quality of Golden Gate Estates. 46 47 Policy 5.2.4: 48 Recognizing the low density in Golden Gate Estates, the County will initiate a review of written 49 notification requirements in the Land Development Code and the Administrative Code related to 50 9.A.3.i Packet Pg. 507 Attachment: Transmittal_Staff Report_Attchmnt_A (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed GMP Amendments Draft Golden Gate Area Master Plan – BCC Transmittal 07/20/2018 18 | P a g e Words underlined are added, words double underline are added as CCPC recommendations, words struck through are deleted, words double struck through are deleted as CCPC recommendations. land use petitions in Golden Gate Estates, within 1 year of adoption, and consider increasing the 1 specified distance, with particular attention to properties located on dead-end streets. 2 3 Policy 5.2.5: 4 Consistent with public safety requirements and best practices for rural areas, outdoor lighting 5 within Golden Gate Estates shall be placed, constructed and maintained in such manner as to 6 prevent or reduce light pollution. In implementing this Policy, the County shall: 7 A. Adhere to the “Collier County Lighting Standards” (County Manager’s Office Standards 8 dated January 6, 2017) as amended, with respect to new and existing County owned or 9 maintained sites and structures. 10 B. Continue to coordinate with FPL and FDOT to improve roadway and security lighting 11 consistent with International Dark Skies Association best practices. 12 C. Consider changes to the Land Development Code and other applicable ordinances to 13 create voluntary or mandatory outdoor lighting standards for commercial, residential or other 14 uses consistent with International Dark Skies Association best practices and determine the 15 extent such standards apply to new or existing development. 16 17 OBJECTIVE 5.3: 18 Encourage the preservation of natural resources in Golden Gate Estates, including protection and 19 enhancement of its watershed. 20 21 Policy 5.3.1: 22 The Land Development Code shall continue to allow and further encourage the preservation of 23 native vegetation and wildlife indigenous to the Estates Area. 24 25 Policy 5.3.2: 26 The County shall continue to pursue the Watershed Management Plan initiatives in Golden Gate 27 Estates as financial and staff resources become available. 28 29 Policy 5.3.3: 30 The County shall encourage the combination of parcels smaller than 2.25 acres with other parcels 31 in order to preserve and enhance low-density environmental advantages. W ithin two years of 32 adoption of this policy, County staff will present recommendations for property owner incentives 33 to the Board of County Commissioners. 34 35 Policy 5.3.4: 36 The County will evaluate the use of transferable development rights for the purpose of securing 37 the preservation of wetland or other environmentally significant land within Golden Gate Estates, 38 in a timeframe directed by the Board. 39 40 Policy 5.3.5: 41 Within two years of adoption, the County, in coordination with the Floodplain Management 42 Committee, will initiate a study on the feasibility of dispersed water management (DWM) for single 43 family Estates lots, and determine the extent to which it will rely on voluntary, incentive or 44 mandatory provisions and whether provisions will apply to developed and undeveloped Estates 45 parcels. 46 47 48 49 9.A.3.i Packet Pg. 508 Attachment: Transmittal_Staff Report_Attchmnt_A (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed GMP Amendments Draft Golden Gate Area Master Plan – BCC Transmittal 07/20/2018 19 | P a g e Words underlined are added, words double underline are added as CCPC recommendations, words struck through are deleted, words double struck through are deleted as CCPC recommendations. Policy 5.3.6: 1 The County will continue to identify and implement educational opportunities related to water 2 resources for parcel owners, homeowners, builders, real estate professionals and the public to 3 aid in understanding and addressing site-specific financial and environmental impacts as well as 4 area-wide impacts to water resources. 5 6 Policy 5.3.7: 7 The County will periodically coordinate with the South Florida Water Management District to 8 review the Level of Service Standards for primary water management canals within the County 9 and their effect on Golden Gate Estates. 10 11 Policy 5.3.8: 12 The County shall continue to pursue a best management practices approach to making septage 13 treatment available to residents and businesses within Golden Gate Estates, as a component of 14 bio-solid processing, either directly, through a private entity, or through a public-private 15 partnership. 16 17 GOAL 6: GOLDEN GATE ESTATES 18 TO PROVIDE FOR A SAFE AND EFFICIENT COUNTY AND LOCAL ROADWAY NETWORK, 19 WHILE AT THE SAME TIME SEEKING TO PRESERVE THE RURAL CHARACTER OF 20 GOLDEN GATE ESTATES IN FUTURE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE 21 GOLDEN GATE AREA. 22 23 OBJECTIVE 6.1: 24 Increase the number of route alternatives for traffic moving through the Golden Gate Area in both 25 east-west and north-south directions, consistent with neighborhood traffic safety considerations, 26 and consistent with the preservation of the area’s rural character. 27 28 Policy 6.1.1: 29 In planning to increase the number of route alternatives through the Estates Area, Collier County 30 will prioritize the following routes over other alternatives: 31 a. The extension of Vanderbilt Beach Road from its current terminus to DeSoto Boulevard. 32 b. The development of a north-south connection from the eastern terminus of White 33 Boulevard to Golden Gate Boulevard. 34 c. The development of a new east-west roadway crossing the Estates Area south of Golden 35 Gate Boulevard. 36 37 Policy 6.1.2: 38 Collier County shall continue to coordinate with the Florida Department of Transportation to 39 implement a study of a potential interchange in the vicinity of I-75 and Everglades Boulevard. The 40 County shall coordinate with FDOT and the Metropolitan Planning Organization to submit a 41 revised interchange justification report for an interchange at I-75 in the vicinity of Everglades Blvd. 42 (Section 31-34, Township 49, Range 28). 43 44 Policy 6.1.3: 45 Everglades Blvd., between Golden Gate Blvd and I-75, shall not be expanded beyond 4 lanes. 46 47 48 49 50 9.A.3.i Packet Pg. 509 Attachment: Transmittal_Staff Report_Attchmnt_A (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed GMP Amendments Draft Golden Gate Area Master Plan – BCC Transmittal 07/20/2018 20 | P a g e Words underlined are added, words double underline are added as CCPC recommendations, words struck through are deleted, words double struck through are deleted as CCPC recommendations. OBJECTIVE 6.2: 1 Increase linkages within the local road system for the purposes of limiting traffic on arterials and 2 major collectors within Golden Gate Estates, shortening vehicular trips, and increasing overall 3 road system capacity. 4 5 Policy 6.2.1: 6 The County shall continue to explore alternative financing methods to facilitate both east - west 7 and north-south bridging of canals within Golden Gate Estates. 8 9 Policy 6.2.2: 10 The County shall update the 2008 Bridge Study to prioritize bridge construction based on 11 emergency response times, evacuation times, cost components, anticipated development 12 patterns and other considerations and shall report its recommendations to the Board of County 13 Commissioners within two years of adoption of this policy. 14 15 Policy 6.2.3: 16 Planning and right-of-way acquisition for bridges within the Estates Area local road system shall 17 make adequate include consideration of the costs and benefits of including provision for sidewalks 18 and bike lanes. 19 20 Policy 6.2.4: 21 Sidewalks and bike lanes shall provide access to government facilities, schools, commercial 22 areas and the planned County Metropolitan Planning Organization greenway network. 23 24 Policy 6.2.5: 25 Planning, funding and implementation of potential greenway trails shall be coordinated between 26 the County and the Metropolitan Planning Organization. 27 28 OBJECTIVE 6.3: 29 Explore alternative financing methods to accelerate paving of lime rock roads. 30 31 Policy 6.3.1: 32 The County will consider the acceleration of the paving of lime rock roads, including a cost/benefit 33 analysis, in its annual budget review. 34 35 GOAL 7: GOLDEN GATE ESTATES 36 TO PROTECT THE LIVES AND PROPERTY OF THE RESIDENTS OF THE GREATER 37 GOLDEN GATE AREA, AS WELL AS THE HEALTH OF THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT, 38 THROUGH THE PROVISION OF EMERGENCY SERVICES THAT PREPARE FOR, MITIGATE, 39 AND RESPOND TO, NATURAL AND MANMADE DISASTERS. 40 41 OBJECTIVE 7.1: 42 Coordinate with local emergency services officials in engineering and constructing road 43 improvements within Golden Gate Estates to ensure that the access needs of fire department, 44 police and emergency management personnel and vehicles are met. 45 46 Policy 7.1.1: 47 The Collier County Transportation Planning Section shall hold at least one annual public meeting 48 with Golden Gate Area emergency services providers and the local civic association in order to 49 9.A.3.i Packet Pg. 510 Attachment: Transmittal_Staff Report_Attchmnt_A (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed GMP Amendments Draft Golden Gate Area Master Plan – BCC Transmittal 07/20/2018 21 | P a g e Words underlined are added, words double underline are added as CCPC recommendations, words struck through are deleted, words double struck through are deleted as CCPC recommendations. ensure that emergency needs are addressed during the acquisition of right-of-way for design and 1 construction of road improvements. 2 3 Policy 7.1.2: 4 The Collier County Transportation Planning Section shall continue to coordinate with Golden Gate 5 Area emergency services providers to prioritize necessary road improvements related to 6 emergency evacuation needs. 7 8 OBJECTIVE 7.2: 9 Ensure that the needs of all applicable emergency services providers are included and 10 coordinated in the overall public project design for capital improvement projects within the Golden 11 Gate Area. 12 13 Policy 7.2.1: 14 Preparation of Collier County’s annual Schedule of Capital Improvements for projects within the 15 Golden Gate Area shall be coordinated with planners, or the agents or representatives with 16 planning responsibilities, from the independent Fire Districts that serve Golden Gate Estates (Fire 17 Districts), public and private utilities, Emergency Medical Services Department and the Collier 18 County Sheriff’s Department to ensure that public project designs are consistent with the needs 19 of these agencies. 20 21 Policy 7.2.2: 22 Planners, or the agents or representatives with planning responsibilities, from The Golden Gate 23 Fire Control and Rescue Districts, Collier County Emergency Medical Services Department and 24 the Collier County Sheriff’s Department will receive copies of pre-construction plans for capital 25 improvement projects in the Golden Gate Area and will be invited to review and comment on plans 26 for the public projects. 27 28 OBJECTIVE 7.3: 29 Maintain and implement public information programs through the Collier County Bureau of 30 Emergency Services, Collier County Sheriff’s Department, Golden Gate Fire Control and Rescue 31 Districts, the Greater Naples Fire Rescue District and other appropriate agencies, to inform 32 residents and visitors of the Greater Golden Gate Area regarding the means to prevent, prepare 33 for, and cope with, man-made and natural disasters. situations. 34 35 Policy 7.3.1: 36 The County, Fire Districts that serve the Golden Gate area, and other appropriate agencies, shall 37 embark on an education program to assist residents in knowing and understanding the value and 38 need for prescribed burning on public lands in high risk fire areas. 39 40 Policy 7.3.2: 41 The Golden Gate Fire Control and Rescue Districts the Greater Naples Fire Rescue District and 42 Collier County Bureau of Emergency Services shall actively promote the Firewise Communities 43 Program through public education in Golden Gate Estates. 44 45 Policy 7.3.3 46 The Golden Gate Fire Control and Rescue Districts, the Greater Naples Fire Rescue District and 47 the Collier County Bureau of Emergency Services shall hold one or more annual “open house” 48 presentations in the Golden Gate Area emphasizing issues related to wildfires, flooding, 49 emergency access and general emergency management. 50 9.A.3.i Packet Pg. 511 Attachment: Transmittal_Staff Report_Attchmnt_A (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed GMP Amendments Draft Golden Gate Area Master Plan – BCC Transmittal 07/20/2018 22 | P a g e Words underlined are added, words double underline are added as CCPC recommendations, words struck through are deleted, words double struck through are deleted as CCPC recommendations. OBJECTIVE 7.4: 1 Pursue appropriate planning and mitigation measures to address the threat of wildfires in Golden 2 Gate Estates. 3 4 Policy 7.4.1: 5 The Collier County Growth Management Division shall evaluate the Land Development Code for 6 Golden Gate Estates and shall eliminate any requirements that are found to be inconsistent with 7 acceptable fire prevention standards. This evaluation process shall be coordinated with the 8 Golden Gate Fire Control and Rescue Districts, the Greater Naples Fire Rescue District and the 9 Collier County Bureau of Emergency Services. 10 11 Policy 7.4.2: 12 Within 1 year of adoption, the County shall begin to evaluate the need to purchase or dedicate 13 parcels within Golden Gate Estates for the purpose of providing staging areas for wildfire 14 prevention activities for the Florida Forest Service, Independent Fire Districts, Collier County or 15 other agency use and will consider whether potential parcels may be used for other public 16 purposes including ride sharing or park and ride facilities allowed by Conditional Use. 17 18 Policy 7.4.3: 19 The County shall explore annually, options for funding wildfire prevention measures undertaken 20 by the County, Florida Forest Service and/or Independent Fire Districts, including but not limited 21 to Golden Gate Estates Municipal Services Taxing Units (MSTU) revenue, grant funding and 22 general fund revenue. 23 24 Policy 7.4.4: 25 The County shall review annually and update as necessary, all interlocal agreements and mutual 26 aid agreements to assure coordination of legal, procedural and educational components of wildfire 27 prevention. 28 29 Policy 7.4.5: 30 All new residential structures shall comply with NFPA (National Fire Protection Association, 31 Incorporated) 299 Standard for Protection of Life and Property from Wildfire, 1997 Edition, or the 32 most recent edition, as adopted by reference in the Florida Fire Code. 33 34 Policy 7.4.6: 35 Modified portions of existing structures shall meet NFPA Standards through the adoption of 36 appropriate regulations in the County Building Codes. 37 38 Policy 7.4.75: 39 County-owned property within Golden Gate Estates shall be subject to an active, on-going 40 management plan to reduce the damage caused by wildfires originating from County-owned 41 properties. 42 43 44 45 46 [REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] 47 48 49 50 9.A.3.i Packet Pg. 512 Attachment: Transmittal_Staff Report_Attchmnt_A (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed GMP Amendments Draft Golden Gate Area Master Plan – BCC Transmittal 07/20/2018 23 | P a g e Words underlined are added, words double underline are added as CCPC recommendations, words struck through are deleted, words double struck through are deleted as CCPC recommendations. B. LAND USE DESIGNATION DESCRIPTION SECTION 1 The following section describes the three land use designations shown on the Golden Gate Area 2 Future Land Use Map. These designations generally indicate the types of land uses for which 3 zoning may be requested. However, these land use designations do not guarantee that a zoning 4 request will be approved. Requests may be denied by the Board of County Commissioners based 5 on criteria in the Land Development Code or in special studies completed for the County. 6 1. URBAN DESIGNATION: 7 URBAN MIXED-USE DISTRICT AND URBAN COMMERCIAL DISTRICT 8 Urban Designated Areas on the Future Land Use Map include two general portions of Collier 9 County: areas with the greatest residential densities and areas in close proximity, which have or 10 are projected to receive future urban support facilities and services. It is intended that Urban 11 Designated areas accommodate the majority of population growth and that new intensive land 12 uses be located within them. 13 The boundaries of the Urban Designated areas have been established based on several factors 14 including: 15 • patterns of existing development, 16 • patterns of approved but unbuilt development, 17 • natural resources, water management, and hurricane risk, 18 • existing and proposed public facilities, 19 • population projections, and 20 • land needed to accommodate growth. 21 The Urban Designation will also accommodate future non-residential uses including essential 22 services as defined by the most recently adopted Collier County Land Development Code. Other 23 permitted non-residential land uses may include: 24 a. parks, open space and recreational use; 25 b. water-dependent and water-related uses; 26 c. child care centers; 27 d. community facilities such as churches, cemeteries, schools and school facilities co-located 28 with other public facilities such as parks, libraries, and community centers, where feasible 29 and mutually acceptable, fire and police stations; 30 e. utility and communication facilities. 31 f. support medical facilities such as physician's offices, medical clinics, treatment, research 32 and rehabilitative centers and pharmacies (as long as the dominant use is medical related) 33 may also be permitted provided they are granted concurrent with or located within ¼ mile 34 of existing or approved hospitals or medical centers which offer primary and urgent care 35 treatment for all types of injuries and traumas, such as, Golden Gate Urgent Care. 36 Stipulations to ensure that the construction of such support medical facilities is concurrent 37 with hospitals or such medical centers shall be determined at the time of zoning approval. 38 39 Group Housing shall be permitted within the Urban Mixed-Use District and Urban Commercial 40 Districts subject to the definitions and regulations as outlined in the Collier County Land 41 Development Code (Ordinance No. 04-41, as amended adopted June 22, 2004, effective 42 9.A.3.i Packet Pg. 513 Attachment: Transmittal_Staff Report_Attchmnt_A (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed GMP Amendments Draft Golden Gate Area Master Plan – BCC Transmittal 07/20/2018 24 | P a g e Words underlined are added, words double underline are added as CCPC recommendations, words struck through are deleted, words double struck through are deleted as CCPC recommendations. October 18, 2004) and consistent with locational requirements in Florida Statutes (Chapter 1 419.001 F.S.). 2 Group Housing includes the following type facilities: 3 aa. Family Care Facility if occupied by not more than six (6) persons shall be permitted in 4 residential areas. 5 bb. Group Care Facility, 6 cc. Care Units, 7 dd. Adult Congregate Living Facilities, and 8 ee. Nursing Homes. 9 A. Urban-Mixed Use District 10 This district is intended to accommodate a variety of residential and commercial land uses 11 including single-family, multi-family, duplex, and mixed use (Planned Unit Development). 12 1. Urban Residential Subdistrict 13 All land within the urban mixed-use designation is zoned and platted. However, any parcel to 14 be rezoned residential is subject to and must be consistent with the Density Rating System. 15 DENSITY RATING SYSTEM: 16 a. BASE DENSITY – Four (4) residential units per gross acre is the eligible density, though 17 not an entitlement. 18 b. DENSITY BONUSES – Density bonuses are discretionary, not entitlements, and are 19 dependent upon meeting the criteria for each bonus provision and compatibility with 20 surrounding properties, as well as the rezone criteria in the Land Development Code. 21 The following densities per gross acre may be added to the base density. In no case 22 shall the maximum permitted density exceed 16 residential dwelling units per gross acre. 23 i. Conversion of Commercial Zoning Bonus 24 • 16 dwelling units – If a project includes the conversion of commercial zoning that 25 has been found to be “Consistent By Policy” through the Collier County Zoning Re-26 evaluation Program (Ordinance No. 90-23), then a bonus of up to 16 dwelling units 27 per acre may be added for every one (1) acre of commercial zoning that is 28 converted to residential zoning. These dwelling units may be distributed over the 29 entire project. 30 ii. Proximity to Activity Center 31 • 3 dwelling units - Within 1 mile of Activity Center 32 iii. Affordable-workforce Housing Bonus 33 As used in this density bonus provision, the term “affordable” shall be as defined in 34 Chapter 420.9071, F.S. To encourage the provision of affordable-workforce housing 35 within certain Districts and Subdistricts in the Urban Designated Area, a maximum of 36 up to 8 12 residential units per gross acre may be added to the base density if the 37 project meets the requirements of the Affordable-workforce Housing Density Bonus 38 Ordinance (Section 2.06.00 of the Land Development Code, Ordinance No.#04-41, as 39 Amended), adopted June 22, 2004 and effective October 18, 2004), and if the 40 affordable-workforce housing units are targeted for families earning no greater than 41 150% 140% of the median income for Collier County. 42 43 9.A.3.i Packet Pg. 514 Attachment: Transmittal_Staff Report_Attchmnt_A (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed GMP Amendments Draft Golden Gate Area Master Plan – BCC Transmittal 07/20/2018 25 | P a g e Words underlined are added, words double underline are added as CCPC recommendations, words struck through are deleted, words double struck through are deleted as CCPC recommendations. iv. Residential In-fill 1 If the project is 10 acres or less in size; located within an area with central public water 2 and sewer service; compatible with surrounding land uses; has no common site 3 development plan with adjoining property; no common ownership with any adjacent 4 parcels; and the parcel in question was not created to take advantage of the in-fill 5 residential density. 6 • 3 dwelling units 7 v. Roadway Access 8 Density credits based on future roadways will be awarded if the developer commits to 9 construct a portion of the roadway (as determined by the County Transportation 10 Services Division) or the road is scheduled for completion during the first five years of 11 the Capital Improvement Schedule. 12 • Add 1 dwelling unit - if direct access to two or more arterial or collector roads as 13 identified in the Traffic Circulation Transportation Element. 14 c. There are Density Bands located around Activity Centers. The density band around 15 an Activity Center shall be measured by the radial distance from the center of the 16 intersection around which the Activity Center is situated. If 50% or more of a project is 17 within the density band, the additional density applies to the entire project. Density bands 18 shall not apply within the Estates Designation. 19 2. High Density Residential Subdistrict: 20 To encourage higher density residential and promote mixed uses in close proximity to Activity 21 Centers, those residential zoned properties permitting up to 12 dwelling units per acre which 22 were located within and consistent with the Activity Center designation at Golden Gate 23 Parkway and Coronado Parkway established by the 1989 Collier County Growth Management 24 Plan and subsequently removed by the creation of a new Activity Center via the adoption of 25 the Golden Gate Area Master Plan are recognized as being consistent with this Master Plan 26 and are outlined on the High Density Residential Subdistrict Map. 27 28 3. Downtown Center Commercial Subdistrict: 29 The primary purpose of the Downtown Center Commercial Subdistrict (see Downtown Center 30 Commercial Subdistrict Map) is to encourage redevelopment along Golden Gate Parkway in 31 order to improve the physical appearance of the area and create a vibrant and viable 32 downtown district for the residents of within Golden Gate City. and Golden Gate Estates. 33 Emphasis shall be placed on the creation of a pedestrian-oriented boulevard. areas, such as 34 outdoor dining areas and pocket parks that do not impede the flow of traffic along Golden 35 Gate Parkway. Also, emphasis shall be placed on the construction of mixed-use buildings. 36 Residential dwelling units constructed in this Subdistrict are intended to promote resident-37 business ownership. The provisions of this Subdistrict are intended to ensure harmonious 38 development of commercial and mixed-use buildings at a pedestrian scale that are compatible 39 with residential development within and outside of the Subdistrict. 40 41 The Subdistrict allows the aggregation of properties in order to promote flexibility in site 42 design. The types of uses permitted within this Subdistrict are low intensity retail, office, 43 personal services, institutional, and residential. Non-residential development is intended to 44 serve the needs of residents within the Subdistrict, surrounding neighborhoods, and 45 passersby. To reduce potential conflicts that may result from residential, commercial and 46 9.A.3.i Packet Pg. 515 Attachment: Transmittal_Staff Report_Attchmnt_A (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed GMP Amendments Draft Golden Gate Area Master Plan – BCC Transmittal 07/20/2018 26 | P a g e Words underlined are added, words double underline are added as CCPC recommendations, words struck through are deleted, words double struck through are deleted as CCPC recommendations. institutional uses in close proximity to one another, existing, non-owner-occupied residential 1 units with frontage on Golden Gate Parkway shall cease to exist no later than seven (7) years 2 after the effective date of the adoption of this Subdistrict. This regulation does not require the 3 removal of residential units located on Golden Gate Parkway that are converted to uses 4 permitted in this Subdistrict within one additional year; nor does this Subdistrict require the 5 removal of residential units located elsewhere in this Subdistrict. 6 a. All development or redevelopment within the boundaries of the Downtown Center 7 Commercial Subdistrict shall include: 8 i. Provisions for bicycle and pedestrian travel. 9 ii. An emphasis on building aesthetics. 10 ii. Emphasis on the orderly circulation of vehicular, bicycle and pedestrian traffic. 11 iii. Provision for broad sidewalks or pathways. 12 iv. Enhanced streetscaping. 13 v. Project interconnections, where possible and feasible. 14 vi. Quality designs for building façades, including lighting, uniform signage and 15 landscaping. 16 b. Permitted uses within this Subdistrict shall include only the following, except as may 17 be restricted in an implementing zoning overlay district, and except as may be 18 prohibited in Paragraph D, below: 19 i. Those uses permitted by right within the C-1, C-2 and C-3 Zoning Districts, as 20 outlined in the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC) in effect on the date 21 of adoption of this Subdistrict in the GGAMP; 22 ii. Residential uses permitted by right in the existing residential zoning districts in this 23 Subdistrict; 24 iii. Those permitted uses that may be allowed in an implementing zoning overlay district. 25 c. Conditional uses allowed by this Subdistrict shall include only: 26 i. Those conditional uses allowed within the C-1, C-2 and C-3 Zoning Districts, as 27 outlined in the LDC in effect on the date of adoption of this Subdistrict in the GGAMP; 28 ii. Those conditional uses allowed, by the LDC in effect on the date of adoption of this 29 Subdistrict in the GGAMP, within existing residential Zoning Districts in this 30 Subdistrict; 31 iii. Those conditional uses that may be allowed in an implementing zoning overlay 32 district; and, 33 iv. Outdoor dining areas not directly abutting the Golden Gate Parkway right-of-way. 34 d. Prohibited uses in this Subdistrict are as follows: 35 i. Automatic food and drink vending machines located exterior to a building. 36 ii. Any commercial use employing drive-up, drive-in or drive-through delivery of goods 37 or services. 38 iii. Enameling, painting or plating as a primary use. However, these uses are permitted 39 if secondary to an artist’s or craft studio. 40 iv. Single-room occupancy hotels, prisons, detention facilities, halfway houses, soup 41 kitchens or homeless shelters. 42 v. Uses as may be prohibited in an implementing zoning overlay district. 43 E. For multi-story buildings: 44 1. Retail, personal service, and institutional uses are allowed on the first floor; 45 9.A.3.i Packet Pg. 516 Attachment: Transmittal_Staff Report_Attchmnt_A (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed GMP Amendments Draft Golden Gate Area Master Plan – BCC Transmittal 07/20/2018 27 | P a g e Words underlined are added, words double underline are added as CCPC recommendations, words struck through are deleted, words double struck through are deleted as CCPC recommendations. 2. All uses allowed by this Subdistrict, except restaurants and cocktail lounges, are 1 allowed on the second floor; and, 2 3. Only residential uses are allowed on the third floor. 3 F. All development and redevelopment on property abutting Golden Gate Parkway shall 4 have a zero (0) foot front yard setback requirement. 5 G. Parking regulations shall be as follows: 6 1. A minimum of three (3) public parking spaces for each 1,000 square feet of 7 commercial floor area. 8 2. A minimum of 1 ½ parking spaces for each residential unit. 9 3. No parking is allowed in the front yard on lots abutting Golden Gate Parkway. 10 4. There shall be no parking requirement for outdoor restaurant seating areas. 11 5. Shared parking is required, where possible and feasible. 12 B. Urban Commercial District 13 1. Mixed Use Activity Center Subdistrict 14 The Activity Center designated on the Future Land Use Map is intended to accommodate 15 commercial zoning within the Urban Designated Area. Activity Centers are intended to be 16 mixed-use (commercial, residential, institutional) in character. The Activity Center concept is 17 designed to concentrate new and existing commercial zoning in locations where traffic impacts 18 can readily be accommodated, to avoid strip and disorganized patterns of commercial 19 development, and to create focal points within the community. The size and configuration of 20 the Activity Center is outlined on the Urban Mixed-Use Activity Center – Golden Gate Parkway 21 and Coronado Parkway Map. 22 The standard for intensity of commercial uses allowed within each Activity Center is the full 23 array of uses allowed in the C-1 through C-5 Zoning Districts, as identified in the Land 24 Development Code (Ordinance No. 04-41, as amended), adopted June 22, 2004 and effective 25 October 18, 2004 26 Hotels and motels that locate within an Activity Center will be allowed to develop at a density 27 consistent with the Land Development Code. Residential density for residential projects 28 located within the boundaries of the Mixed-Use Activity Center shall be allowed to develop at 29 a density of up to 16 22 residential units per gross acre. This density may be distributed 30 throughout the project, including any portion located outside of the boundary of the Mixed-31 Use Activity Center. 32 33 Certain uses specifically intended to support economic development in Golden Gate City are 34 allowed within the Mixed Use Activity Center. as follows: The following uses, as identified with 35 a number from the Standard Industrial Classification Manual are permissible. 36 a. Advanced manufacturing, including automated apparel (2211 -2299, and 2311 -37 2399), light assembly (3679) and 3D printing (3571, 3629); 38 b. Call centers (7338); 39 c. Software development and programming (3635, 7371); 40 d. Internet technologies and electronic commerce (7374); 41 e. Data and information processing (7374); 42 f. Professional services that are export based such as laboratory research or testing 43 activities (8734); 44 9.A.3.i Packet Pg. 517 Attachment: Transmittal_Staff Report_Attchmnt_A (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed GMP Amendments Draft Golden Gate Area Master Plan – BCC Transmittal 07/20/2018 28 | P a g e Words underlined are added, words double underline are added as CCPC recommendations, words struck through are deleted, words double struck through are deleted as CCPC recommendations. g. Other uses as may be determined by the Board of County Commissioners 1 consistent with the intent of supporting economic development in Golden Gate 2 City. 3 4 2. Golden Gate Urban Commercial In-fill Subdistrict 5 This Subdistrict is located at the southwest quadrant of C.R. 951 and Golden Gate Parkway. 6 Due to the existing zoning and land use pattern in proximity to the Commercial In-fill 7 Subdistrict (see Golden Gate Urban Commercial Infill Subdistrict and Golden Gate Estates 8 Commercial Infill Subdistrict Map) and the need to ensure adequate development standards 9 to buffer adjacent land uses, commercial uses shall be permitted under the following criteria: 10 a. Commercial uses shall be limited to: 11 i. Low intensity commercial uses that are compatible with both residential and 12 intermediate commercial uses, in order to provide for small scale shopping and 13 personal needs, and 14 ii. Intermediate commercial to provide for a wider variety of goods and services in 15 areas that have a higher degree of automobile traffic. These uses shall be similar 16 to C-1, C-2, or C-3 zoning districts outlined in the Collier County Land 17 Development Code (Ordinance 91-102), adopted October 30, 1991. 18 b. Rezones shall be encouraged in the form of a Planned Unit Development (there shall 19 be no minimum acreage requirement for PUD rezones except for the requirement that 20 all requests for rezoning must be at least forty thousand (40,000) square feet in area 21 unless the proposed rezone is an extension of an existing zoning district consistent 22 with the Golden Gate Area Master Plan); 23 c. Projects within this Subdistrict shall make provisions for shared parking arrangements 24 with adjoining commercial developments when appropriate; 25 d. Driveways and curb cuts for projects within this Subdistrict shall be consolidated with 26 adjoining commercial developments; and 27 e. Access to projects shall not be permitted from Collier Boulevard. 28 3. Santa Barbara Commercial Subdistrict 29 The boundaries of the Subdistrict are hereby expanded to include the former Commercial 30 Subdistrict and also to extend approximately one (1) block to the east of the former boundary 31 (see Santa Barbara Commercial Subdistrict Map). The intent of the Santa Barbara 32 Commercial Subdistrict is to provide Golden Gate City with an area that is primarily 33 commercial, with an allowance for certain conditional uses. The types of uses permitted within 34 this Subdistrict are low intensity retail, offices, personal services, and institutional uses, such 35 as churches and day care centers. Such development is intended to serve the needs of 36 residents within the Subdistrict and surrounding neighborhoods and persons traveling nearby. 37 Commercial and institutional uses permitted within this Subdistrict are those that: 38 a. Generate/attract relatively low traffic volumes; 39 b. Are appropriately landscaped and buffered to protect nearby residential properties; 40 and 41 c. Are architecturally designed to be compatible with nearby residential areas. 42 • Limit access and traffic flow to or from Santa Barbara Boulevard. 43 This Subdistrict is intended to promote commercial and institutional development 44 opportunities. Therefore, in order to reduce the potential conflicts that may result from 45 9.A.3.i Packet Pg. 518 Attachment: Transmittal_Staff Report_Attchmnt_A (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed GMP Amendments Draft Golden Gate Area Master Plan – BCC Transmittal 07/20/2018 29 | P a g e Words underlined are added, words double underline are added as CCPC recommendations, words struck through are deleted, words double struck through are deleted as CCPC recommendations. residential, commercial and institutional uses in close proximity, existing residential uses shall 1 cease to exist no later than seven (7) years after the effective date of the adoption of the 2 revised Subdistrict boundaries. This does not require the removal of the residential structures 3 if they can be, and are, converted to uses permitted in this Subdistrict, within one additional 4 year. The requirement to cease existing residential uses does not apply to owner-occupied 5 dwelling units. 6 7 Within one year of the effective date of the adoption of the revised Subdistrict boundaries, 8 the Land Development Code shall be amended to provide specific uses and development 9 standards to implement the revised Subdistrict. These shall include, but not necessarily be 10 limited to: 11 1. Landscaping and buffering requirements. 12 2. Water management provisions. 13 3. Architectural design standards. 14 4. Prohibition of automobile service stations and similar repair facilities. This does not 15 preclude convenience marts with gasoline pumps. 16 5. Encouragement of shared parking and access with adjacent projects, wherever 17 possible. 18 6. Provisions allowing local street vacation or relocation, if alternate access is provided. 19 7. A minimum project size of one acre. 20 8. Encouragement of submittal of proposed development in the form of a PUD Zoning 21 District. 22 9. Provisions for sidewalks and coordination of sidewalk location between adjacent 23 properties. 24 10. Signage restrictions. 25 11. Building height limitation of two stories, not to exceed a maximum of 35 feet. 26 12. Variance provisions applicable to the above items, except items 4, 6, 9, and 11. 27 28 4. Golden Gate Parkway Professional Office Commercial Subdistrict (THIS 29 SUBDISTRICT IS REDESIGNATED TO THE DOWNTOWN CENTER COMMERCIAL 30 SUBDISTRICT) 31 The provisions of this Subdistrict (see Golden Gate Parkway Professional Office Commercial 32 Subdistrict Map) are intended to provide Golden Gate City with a viable professional office 33 district with associated small-scale retail as identified under item A, below. This Subdistrict 34 has two purposes: 35 • to serve as a bona-fide entry way into Golden Gate City; and 36 • to provide a community focal point and sense of place. 37 The uses permitted within this district are generally low intensity, office development, 38 associated retail uses, and community facility uses, such as churches, which will minimize 39 vehicular traffic, provide suitable landscaping, control ingress and egress, and ensure 40 compatibility with abutting residential uses. 41 A. For projects contained wholly within the original Professional Office Commercial 42 Subdistrict with a minimum depth of 150 feet as measured from the property line 43 adjacent and parallel with Golden Gate Parkway, the following small-scale retail uses are 44 permitted: 45 1. Apparel and accessory stores. 46 9.A.3.i Packet Pg. 519 Attachment: Transmittal_Staff Report_Attchmnt_A (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed GMP Amendments Draft Golden Gate Area Master Plan – BCC Transmittal 07/20/2018 30 | P a g e Words underlined are added, words double underline are added as CCPC recommendations, words struck through are deleted, words double struck through are deleted as CCPC recommendations. 2. Auto and home supply stores (Auto accessory dealers-retail, automobile parts 1 dealers-retail and speed shops-retail only). 2 3. Eating places (except carry-out establishments, drive-through only 3 establishments, commissary restaurants, concession stands, contract feeding, 4 food service-institutional, hamburger stands, hot-dog stands, Ice cream stands, 5 Industrial feeding, refreshment stands, snack shops, soft drink stands and tea 6 rooms). 7 4. Food stores (except Convenience Food stores-retail, grocery stores and 8 supermarkets). 9 5. General merchandise stores. 10 6. Home furniture, furnishing, and equipment stores. 11 7. Libraries. 12 8. Miscellaneous repair services (no electronic repair, except computer repair only in 13 conjunction with sales). 14 9. Miscellaneous retail. 15 10. Paint, glass, and wallpaper stores. 16 11. Personal services (except coin operated laundries, beauty shops and 17 barbershops). 18 12. United States Postal Service. 19 B. Properties that qualify under item A, above, will be subject to the following: 20 All uses listed shall be in accordance with the Standard Industrial Classification Codes 21 within the C-2 zoning district as identified in the Collier County Land Development Code 22 with the exceptions noted above. Item A.2, above, shall be consistent with the LDC uses 23 listed in the C-3 zoning district with the exceptions noted above. 24 Ordering devices and/or order windows at fast food restaurants shall not be visible from 25 Golden Gate Parkway. 26 Vehicular access through adjacent properties to 53rd Street SW may by allowed at time of 27 rezone upon completion of appropriate cross access easements. 28 Any property line of the subject parcel that is immediately adjacent to single family 29 residential must provide a minimum Type “C” landscape buffer as indicated in the Collier 30 County Land Development Code. 31 Buildings utilizing second story office or retail, or a combination thereof, may request up 32 to 35’ in height, subject to architectural design elements incorporated through the rezone 33 process. Buildings will be limited to two stories in height with no parking under the building. 34 All buildings shall provide a common theme incorporating architecture and project 35 signage. 36 4. Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict 37 The primary purpose of the Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict (see Collier Boulevard 38 Commercial Subdistrict Map) is to encourage redevelopment along Collier Boulevard in order 39 to improve the physical appearance of the area. This Subdistrict is intended to allow a mix of 40 uses, including heavy commercial within those areas presently zoned C-5. 41 9.A.3.i Packet Pg. 520 Attachment: Transmittal_Staff Report_Attchmnt_A (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed GMP Amendments Draft Golden Gate Area Master Plan – BCC Transmittal 07/20/2018 31 | P a g e Words underlined are added, words double underline are added as CCPC recommendations, words struck through are deleted, words double struck through are deleted as CCPC recommendations. This Subdistrict includes properties zoned RMF-12, C-4, and C-5. This Subdistrict will allow 1 commercial development on lands presently zoned residential. 2 Buildings shall be limited to three stories, not to exceed 50 feet, inclusive of under building 3 parking. 4 Within one year of the effective date of this Subdistrict, the Land Development Code shall be 5 amended to establish a zoning overlay containing regulations to implement this Subdistrict. 6 7 A. All development and redevelopment within this Subdistrict shall include: 8 1. Provisions for bicycle and pedestrian travel. 9 2. An emphasis on building aesthetics. 10 3. Emphasis on the orderly circulation of vehicular, bicycle and pedestrian traffic. 11 4. Provision for adequate ingress and egress, which may include local street vacation 12 or relocation if alternative access is provided. 13 5. Provision for broad sidewalks or pathways. 14 6. Enhanced streetscaping. 15 7. Shared parking and/or property interconnections, where possible and feasible. 16 8. Quality designs for building facades, including lighting, uniform signage and 17 landscaping. 18 2. ESTATES DESIGNATION 19 This designation is characterized by low density semi-rural residential lots with limited 20 opportunities for other land uses. Typical lots are 2.25 acres in size. However, there are some 21 legal non-conforming lots as small as 1.14 acres. Residential density is limited to a maximum of 22 one unit per 2.25 gross acres, or one unit per legal non-conforming lot of record, exclusive of 23 guesthouses. Multiple family dwelling units, duplexes, and other structures containing two or 24 more principal dwellings, are prohibited in all Districts and Subdistricts in this Designation. 25 Generally, the Estates Designation also accommodates future non-residential uses, including: 26 A. Conditional uses and essential services as defined in the Land Development Code, except 27 as prohibited in the Neighborhood Center Subdistrict. Also, refer to the Conditional Uses 28 Subdistrict. 29 B. Parks, open space and recreational uses. 30 C. Group Housing shall be permitted subject to the definitions and regulations as outlined in 31 the Collier County Land Development Code (Ordinance No. 04-41, as amendedadopted 32 June 22, 2004, effective October 18, 2004) and consistent with locational requirements in 33 Florida Statutes (Chapter 419.001 F.S.). 34 D. Schools and school facilities in the Estates Designation north of I-75, and where feasible 35 and mutually acceptable, co-locate schools with other public facilities, such as parks, 36 libraries and community centers to the extent possible. 37 Group Housing includes the following type facilities: 38 A. Family Care Facility if occupied by not more than six (6) persons shall be permitted in 39 residential areas. 40 B. Group Care Facility, 41 C. Care Units, 42 9.A.3.i Packet Pg. 521 Attachment: Transmittal_Staff Report_Attchmnt_A (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed GMP Amendments Draft Golden Gate Area Master Plan – BCC Transmittal 07/20/2018 32 | P a g e Words underlined are added, words double underline are added as CCPC recommendations, words struck through are deleted, words double struck through are deleted as CCPC recommendations. D. Adult Congregate Living Facilities, and 1 E. Nursing Homes. 2 All of the above uses shall be consistent with all of the Goals, Objectives and Policies of the 3 Golden Gate Area Master Plan. 4 5 A. Estates ‒ Mixed-Use District 6 7 1. Residential Estates Subdistrict 8 Single-family residential development is allowed within this Subdistrict at a maximum density 9 of one unit per 2.25 gross acres, or one unit per legal non-conforming lot of record, exclusive 10 of guesthouses. 11 2. Neighborhood Center Subdistrict 12 Recognizing the need to provide basic goods, services and amenities to Estates residents, 13 Neighborhood Centers have been designated on the Golden Gate Area Future Land Use Map. 14 The Neighborhood Center designation does not guarantee that commercial zoning will be 15 granted. The designation only provides the opportunity to request commercial zoning. 16 a. The Collier County Land Development Code shall be amended to provide rural 17 design criteria to regulate all new commercial development within Neighborhood 18 Centers. 19 b. Locations 20 Neighborhood Centers are located along major roadways and are distributed within 21 Golden Gate Estates according to commercial demand estimates. (See Golden Gate 22 Estates Neighborhood Centers Map). The centers are designed to concentrate all 23 new commercial zoning, and conditional uses, as allowed in the Estates Zoning 24 District, in locations where traffic impacts can be readily accommodated and to avoid 25 strip and disorganized patterns of commercial and conditional use development. 26 Four Neighborhood Centers are established as follows: 27 i. Wilson Boulevard and Golden Gate Boulevard Center. 28 This center consists of three quadrants at the intersection of Wilson and Golden 29 Gate Boulevards (See Map 10). The NE and SE quadrants of the Center consist 30 of Tract 1 and 2, Unit 14, Tract 17, Unit 13 and the western half of Tract 18, Unit 31 13 Golden Gate Estates. The NE quadrant of Wilson and Golden Gate 32 Boulevards is approximately 8.45 acres. The parcels within the NE quadrant 33 shall be interconnected and share access to Golden Gate Boulevard and Wilson 34 Boulevard to minimize connections to these two major roadways. The SE 35 quadrant of Wilson and Golden Gate Boulevards is 7.15 acres, allows 5.00 acres 36 of commercial development, and allocates 2.15 acres to project buffering and 37 right-of-way for Golden Gate Boulevard and Wilson Boulevard. The SW 38 quadrant of the Center is approximately 4.86 11.78 acres in size and consists of 39 Tract 124, 125, and the north 150 feet of Tract 126, Unit 12 of Golden Gate 40 Estates. The acreage specified for the SE and SW quadrants may be increased 41 through the rezone process if such increase will support infrastructure 42 improvements necessary to allow changes or expansion of allowed uses, or to 43 improve functionality of the infrastructure improvements, based on the developed 44 square footage as of January 1, 2018. For purposes of this paragraph, 45 9.A.3.i Packet Pg. 522 Attachment: Transmittal_Staff Report_Attchmnt_A (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed GMP Amendments Draft Golden Gate Area Master Plan – BCC Transmittal 07/20/2018 33 | P a g e Words underlined are added, words double underline are added as CCPC recommendations, words struck through are deleted, words double struck through are deleted as CCPC recommendations. infrastructure improvements include site ingress and egress, drainfield, package 1 plant or improved stormwater management. 2 3 ii. Collier Boulevard and Pine Ridge Road Center. 4 The center at Collier Boulevard and Pine Ridge Road is located on both sides of 5 the intersection. Tracts 109-114, Unit 26, Golden Gate Estates are included in 6 this center as eligible for commercial development. (See Collier Boulevard/Pine 7 Ridge Road Center Map). The E1/2 of Tract 107, Unit 26 is also included within 8 this center but is only to be used for buffer, water management and open space. 9 iii. Everglades Boulevard and Golden Gate Boulevard Center. 10 This Center consists of all four quadrants at the intersection of Everglades and 11 Golden Gate Boulevards (See Golden Gate Boulevard/Everglades Boulevard 12 Center Map). The NE quadrant of the Center is approximately 5.46 acres in size 13 and consists of Tract 1, Unit 77 of Golden Gate Estates. The SE quadrant of the 14 Center is approximately 5.46 acres in size and consists of Tract 97, Unit 81 of 15 Golden Gate Estates. The NW quadrant of the Center is approximately 5.46 16 acres in size and consists of Tract 128, Unit 76 of Golden Gate Estates. The SW 17 quadrant of the Center is approximately 5.46 acres in size and consists of Tract 18 96, Unit 81 of Golden Gate Estates. 19 20 iv. The Immokalee Road and Everglades Boulevard Center 21 This Center is located in the southwest and the southeast quadrants of the 22 intersection. This Center consists of three Tracts: Tract 128, Unit 47, is 5.15 + 23 acres and is located within the southwest quadrant of the Center, south of the 24 fire station; and, Tracts 113 and 16, Unit 46, are 4.05 +acres and 5.15 + acres 25 respectively, and are within the southeast quadrant of the Center, east of the 26 fire station. 27 c. Criteria for land uses at the centers are as follows: 28 i. Commercial uses shall be limited to intermediate commercial so as to provide 29 for a wider variety of goods and services in areas that have a higher degree of 30 automobile traffic. These uses shall be similar to C-1, C-2, or C-3 zoning 31 districts outlined in the Collier County Land Development Code (Ordinance No. 32 04-41, as amended adopted June 22, 2004, effective October 18, 2004), except 33 as prohibited below. 34 ii. The Neighborhood Center located at the intersection of Pine Ridge Road and 35 Collier Boulevard may be developed at 100% commercial and must provide 36 internal circulation. Any rezoning is encouraged to be in the form of a PUD. 37 This Neighborhood Center may also be utilized for single-family residential or 38 conditional uses allowed in the Estates zoning district such as churches, social 39 or fraternal organizations, childcare centers, schools, and group care facilities. 40 iii. Parcels immediately adjacent to commercial zoning within the Neighborhood 41 Centers located at the intersections Golden Gate Boulevard and Wilson 42 Boulevard (excluding the SW quadrant), Golden Gate Boulevard and 43 Everglades Boulevard, Everglades Boulevard and Immokalee Road may qualify 44 for Conditional Use under the transitional conditional use provision of the 45 Conditional Uses Subdistrict of this Master Plan Element. 46 9.A.3.i Packet Pg. 523 Attachment: Transmittal_Staff Report_Attchmnt_A (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed GMP Amendments Draft Golden Gate Area Master Plan – BCC Transmittal 07/20/2018 34 | P a g e Words underlined are added, words double underline are added as CCPC recommendations, words struck through are deleted, words double struck through are deleted as CCPC recommendations. iv. A single project shall utilize no more than 50% of the total allowed commercial 1 acreage. This percentage may be increased at the discretion of the Board of 2 County Commissioners. 3 v. The project shall make provisions for shared parking arrangements with 4 adjoining developments. 5 vi. Access points shall be limited to one per 180 feet commencing from the right-6 of -way of the major intersecting streets of the Neighborhood Center. A 7 maximum of three curb cuts per quadrant shall be allowed. 8 vii. Driveways and curb cuts shall be consolidated with adjoining developments, 9 whenever possible. 10 viii. Driveways accessing parcels on opposite sides of the roadway shall be in direct 11 alignment, except when the roadway median between the two parcels has no 12 opening. 13 ix. Projects shall provide a 25-foot wide landscape buffer abutting the external 14 right-of-way. This buffer shall contain two staggered rows of trees that shall be 15 spaced no more than 30 feet on center, and a double row hedge at least 24 16 inches in height at time of planting and attaining a minimum of three feet height 17 within one year. A minimum of 50% of the 25-foot wide buffer area shall be 18 comprised of a meandering bed of shrubs and ground covers other than grass. 19 Existing native trees must be retained within this 25-foot wide buffer area to aid 20 in achieving this buffer requirement; other existing native vegetation shall be 21 retained, where possible, to aid in achieving this buffer requirement. Water 22 retention/detention areas shall be allowed in this buffer area if left in natural 23 state, and drainage conveyance through the buffer area shall be allowed if 24 necessary to reach an external outfall. 25 26 a. For Tract 114, Golden Gate Estates, Unit 26, access shall be 27 restricted to 11th Avenue S.W. Also, vehicular interconnection shall 28 be provided to the adjacent property(s) in the Pine Ridge 29 Road/Collier Boulevard Neighborhood Center. 30 b. All buildings shall have tile roofs, ‘Old Style Florida’ metal roofs, or 31 decorative parapet walls above the roofline. The buildings shall be 32 finished in light, subdued colors, except for decorative trim. 33 x. Building heights shall be limited to one (1) story, with a maximum height of 34 thirty-five (35) feet. This provision only applies east of Collier Boulevard. 35 xi. All lighting facilities shall be architecturally–designed and shall be limited 36 to a height of twenty-five (25) feet. Such lighting facilities shall be shielded 37 from neighboring residential land uses and consistent with Policy 5.2.4. 38 xii. Commercial uses shall encourage pedestrian traffic through placement of 39 sidewalks, pedestrian walkways, and marked crosswalks within parking 40 areas. Adjacent projects shall coordinate placement of sidewalks so that a 41 continuous pathway through the Neighborhood Center is created. 42 xiii. All buildings and projects within any single specific quadrant of the 43 Subdistrict shall utilize a common architectural theme. This theme shall be 44 applicable to both building design and signage. 45 9.A.3.i Packet Pg. 524 Attachment: Transmittal_Staff Report_Attchmnt_A (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed GMP Amendments Draft Golden Gate Area Master Plan – BCC Transmittal 07/20/2018 35 | P a g e Words underlined are added, words double underline are added as CCPC recommendations, words struck through are deleted, words double struck through are deleted as CCPC recommendations. xiv. No building footprint shall exceed 5,000 square feet, unless the project is 1 submitted in the form of a PUD. Walkways or courtyards shall connect 2 adjacent buildings. This provision only applies east of Collier Boulevard. 3 xv. Drive-through establishments shall be limited to banks, with no more than 4 3 lanes; the drive-through areas shall be architecturally integrated with the 5 rest of the building. This provision only applies east of Collier Boulevard. 6 xvi. Fences or walls may be constructed on the commercial side of the required 7 landscape buffer between adjacent commercial and residential uses. If 8 constructed, such fences or walls shall not exceed five (5) feet in height. 9 Walls shall be constructed of brick or stone. Fences shall be of wood or 10 concrete post or rail types and shall be of open design (not covered by 11 slats, boards or wire). 12 xvii. Projects directly abutting residential property (property zoned E-Estates 13 and without an approved conditional use) shall provide, at a minimum, a 14 seventy-five (75) feet wide buffer in which no parking uses are permitted. 15 Twenty-five (25) feet of the width of the buffer along the developed area 16 shall be a landscape buffer. A minimum of fifty (50) feet of the buffer width 17 shall consist of retained native vegetation and must be consistent with 18 subsection 3.9.5.5.6 3.05.07H. of the Collier County Land Development 19 Code (LDC). The native vegetation retention area may consist of a 20 perimeter berm and be used for water management detention. Any newly 21 constructed berm shall be revegetated to meet subsection 3.9.5.5.6 22 3.05.07H. of the LDC (native vegetation replanting requirements). 23 Additionally, in order to be considered for approval, use of the native 24 vegetation retention area for water management purposes shall meet the 25 following criteria: 26 a. There shall be no adverse impacts to the native vegetation being 27 retained. The additional water directed to this area shall not increase 28 the annual hydro-period unless it is proven that such would have no 29 adverse impact to the existing vegetation. 30 b. If the project requires permitting by the South Florida Water 31 Management District, the project shall provide a letter or official 32 document from the District indicating that the native vegetation within 33 the retention area will not have to be removed to comply with water 34 management requirements. If the District cannot or will not supply such 35 a letter, then the native vegetation retention area shall not be used for 36 water management. 37 c. If the project is reviewed by Collier County, the County engineer shall 38 provide evidence that no removal of native vegetation is necessary to 39 facilitate the necessary storage of water in the water management area. 40 xix. Projects within the Neighborhood Center Subdistrict that are submitted 41 as PUDs shall provide a functional public open-space component. Such 42 public open-space shall be developed as green space within a 43 pedestrian-accessible courtyard, as per Section 2.4.5.4 4.06.03B. of the 44 Collier County Land Development Code, as in effect at the time of P.U.D. 45 approval. 46 9.A.3.i Packet Pg. 525 Attachment: Transmittal_Staff Report_Attchmnt_A (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed GMP Amendments Draft Golden Gate Area Master Plan – BCC Transmittal 07/20/2018 36 | P a g e Words underlined are added, words double underline are added as CCPC recommendations, words struck through are deleted, words double struck through are deleted as CCPC recommendations. xx. The following principal permitted uses are prohibited within 1 Neighborhood Centers: 2 a. Drinking Places (5813) and Liquor Stores (5921) 3 b. Mail Order Houses (5961) 4 c. Merchandizing Machine Operators (5962) 5 d. Power Laundries (7211) 6 e. Crematories (7261) (Does not include non-crematory Funeral 7 Parlors) 8 f. Radio, TV Representatives (7313) and Direct Mail Advertising 9 Services (7331) 10 g. NEC Recreational Shooting Ranges, Waterslides, etc. (7999) 11 h. General Hospitals (8062), Psychiatric Hospitals (8063), and Specialty 12 Hospitals (8069) 13 i. Elementary and Secondary Schools (8211), Colleges (8221), Junior 14 Colleges (8222) Libraries (8231) 15 j. Correctional Institutions (9223) 16 k. Waste Management (9511) 17 l. Homeless Shelters and Soup Kitchens. 18 xxi. The following additional restrictions and standards apply to Tract 124 and 19 the north 150 feet of Tract 126, within the southwest quadrant of the 20 Wilson Boulevard and Golden Gate Boulevard Center: 21 a. Commercial uses shall be limited to the following: 22 1. medical offices and clinics and professional offices, except 23 surveyors; and, 24 2. medical related uses, such as a wellness center. 25 b. The ordinance rezoning this property to allow commercial uses shall 26 include the following requirements: 27 1. no less than sixty percent (60%) of the gross square footage 28 shall be designated for medical offices and clinics; and, 29 2. parking for the entire project shall be that required for medical 30 office or clinic use by the Land Development Code (Ordinance 31 No. 04-41, as amended), so as to allow 100 percent medical 32 office use. 33 c. Parking lot lighting shall be restricted to bollards except as may be 34 required to comply with lighting standards in the Land Development 35 Code (Ordinance No. 04-41, as amended) and other governing 36 regulations. 37 d. The Neighborhood Center boundaries of this quadrant shall not be 38 further expanded. 39 3. Conditional Uses Subdistrict 40 Various types of conditional uses are permitted in the Estates zoning district within the Golden 41 Gate Estates area. In order to control the location and spacing of new conditional uses, one 42 of the following four sets of criteria shall be met: 43 a. Essential Services Conditional Use Provisions: 44 Those Essential Services Conditional Uses, as identified within Section 2.01.03 G. of 45 the Collier County Land Development Code, may be allowed anywhere within the 46 9.A.3.i Packet Pg. 526 Attachment: Transmittal_Staff Report_Attchmnt_A (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed GMP Amendments Draft Golden Gate Area Master Plan – BCC Transmittal 07/20/2018 37 | P a g e Words underlined are added, words double underline are added as CCPC recommendations, words struck through are deleted, words double struck through are deleted as CCPC recommendations. Estates Zoning District, except as prohibited in certain Neighborhood Centers, and are 1 described as: 2 1. electric or gas generating plants, 3 2. effluent tanks, 4 3. major re-pump stations, 5 4. sewage treatment plants, including percolation ponds, 6 5. hospitals and hospices, 7 6. water aeration or treatment plants, 8 7. governmental facilities (except for those Permitted Uses identified in Section 9 2.01.03 of the Land Development Code), 10 8. public water supply acquisition, withdrawal, or extraction facilities, and 11 9. public safety service facilities, and other similar facilities. 12 b. Golden Gate Parkway and Collier Boulevard Special Provisions: 13 ● Conditional uses shall not be permitted on those parcels immediately adjacent to 14 the west side of Collier Boulevard within the Estates Designated Area except 15 where the parcel is directly bounded by conditional uses on two (2) or more side 16 yards with no intervening rights-of-ways or waterways; and, except as provided in 17 subparagraph 2., below; and, except for essential services, as described in 18 paragraph a), above. 19 20 1. Recognizing the existing residential nature of the land uses surrounding the I-21 75 interchange at Golden Gate Parkway, there shall be no further conditional 22 uses for properties abutting Golden Gate Parkway, between Livingston Road 23 and Santa Barbara Boulevard, except: as permitted within the Golden Gate 24 Parkway Institutional Subdistrict and the Golden Gate Estates Commercial 25 Infill Subdistrict; except as provided in paragraphs 3.b.3., below; and except 26 as provided in subparagraphs 1.,3 and 5 below; for the properties identified 27 as Unit 30 Tracts 113-115 and the N 150’ of tract 116 that have existing 28 Conditional Uses; and, except for essential services, as described in 29 paragraph a., above. 30 2. Further, no properties abutting streets accessing Golden Gate Parkway, 31 between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard, shall be approved 32 for conditional uses except: as permitted within the Golden Gate Parkway 33 Institutional Subdistrict; and, except as provided in subparagraph 1 3. below; 34 and, except for essential services, as described in paragraph a. above. This 35 provision shall not be construed to affect the area described in Paragraph a., 36 above. 37 3. In consideration of the improvements associated with the interchange at 38 Interstate 75 and Golden Gate Parkway, the existing conditional use (church 39 and related facilities) located at the southeast corner of Golden Gate Parkway 40 and 66th Street S.W. may be expanded in acreage and intensity along the south 41 side of Golden Gate Parkway to the east of 66th Street S.W., but the total project 42 area shall not exceed approximately 9.22 acres (see Golden Gate Parkway 43 Interchange Conditional Uses Area Map). 44 4. The parcel located immediately south of the Commercial Western Estates Infill 45 Subdistrict, on the west side of Collier Boulevard, and at the southwest 46 quadrant of the intersection of Vanderbilt Beach Road and Collier Boulevard, 47 shall be eligible for a transitional conditional use designation. 48 9.A.3.i Packet Pg. 527 Attachment: Transmittal_Staff Report_Attchmnt_A (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed GMP Amendments Draft Golden Gate Area Master Plan – BCC Transmittal 07/20/2018 38 | P a g e Words underlined are added, words double underline are added as CCPC recommendations, words struck through are deleted, words double struck through are deleted as CCPC recommendations. 5. Conditional use for expansion of the existing educational and charitable social 1 organization (Naples Bridge Center) is allowed on the east 150 feet of Tract 75 2 and the west 150 feet of Tract 82, Unit 30, Golden Gate Estates. The maximum 3 building area permitted on the two parcels shall be limited to 15,000 square 4 feet. Use of Tract 82 shall be limited to parking, water management and open 5 space uses. See Conditional Uses Subdistrict Golden Gate Parkway Special 6 Provisions map. 7 6. The property located on Collier Boulevard identified as Golden Gate Estates 8 Unit 1, north 150 feet of TR 114, less right-of-way, shall be eligible for 9 Conditional Use. 10 c. Neighborhood Center Transitional Conditional Use Provisions: 11 Conditional uses shall be allowed immediately adjacent to designated Neighborhood 12 Centers subject to the following criteria: 13 1. Properties eligible for conditional uses shall abut the arterial or collector road 14 serving the Neighborhood Center, 15 2. Such uses shall be limited to transitional conditional uses that are compatible with 16 both residential and commercial such as churches, social or fraternal 17 organizations, childcare centers, schools, and group care facilities, 18 3. All conditional uses shall make provisions for shared parking arrangements with 19 adjoining developments whenever possible, 20 4. Conditional uses abutting Estates zoned property shall provide, at a minimum, a 21 75-foot buffer of native vegetation in which no parking or water management uses 22 are permitted, 23 5. Conditional uses adjoining the commercial uses within Neighborhood Centers 24 shall, whenever possible, share parking areas, access and curb cuts with the 25 adjoining commercial use, in order to facilitate traffic movement. 26 27 d. Transitional Conditional Uses: 28 Conditional uses may be granted in Transitional Areas. A Transitional Area is defined 29 as an area located between existing non-residential and residential areas. The 30 purpose of this provision is to allow conditional uses in areas that are adjacent to 31 existing non-residential uses and are therefore generally not appropriate for residential 32 use. The conditional use will act as a buffer between non-residential and residential 33 areas. 34 The following criteria shall apply for Transitional Conditional Use requests: 35 1. Site shall be directly adjacent to a non-residential use (zoned or developed) or 36 directly adjacent to an intersection of a 4-lane or greater roadway with a 4-lane or 37 greater roadway, existing or planned, as identified in the Metropolitan Planning 38 Organization’s Long Range Transportation “cost feasible” plan; 39 2. Site shall be 2.25 acres, or more, in size or be at least 150 feet in width and shall 40 not exceed 5 acres; 41 3. Conditional uses Site abutting Estates zoned property without an approved 42 conditional use shall provide, at a minimum, a 75-foot buffer of native vegetation 43 in which no parking or water management uses are permitted; 44 • Conditional uses shall be located on the allowable acreage adjacent to the 45 non-residential use; 46 9.A.3.i Packet Pg. 528 Attachment: Transmittal_Staff Report_Attchmnt_A (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed GMP Amendments Draft Golden Gate Area Master Plan – BCC Transmittal 07/20/2018 39 | P a g e Words underlined are added, words double underline are added as CCPC recommendations, words struck through are deleted, words double struck through are deleted as CCPC recommendations. 4. Site shall not be adjacent to a church or other place of worship, school, social or 1 fraternal organization, child care center, convalescent home, hospice, rest home, 2 home for the aged, adult foster home, children's home, rehabilitation centers; 3 5. Site shall not be adjacent to parks or open space and recreational uses; and 4 6. Site shall not be adjacent to permitted (by right) Essential Service uses, as 5 identified in Section 2.6.9 2.01.03 of the Land Development Code, except may be 6 located adjacent to libraries, and museums and electrical substations. 7 7. For a Transitional Conditional Use petition at a major intersection, in an effort to 8 avoid the concentration of the same type of conditional use at a single intersection, 9 the existing land uses at the intersection shall be considered. 10 • Project shall provide adequate buffering from adjacent properties allowing 11 residential uses. 12 e. Special Exceptions to Conditional Use Locational Criteria: 13 1. Temporary use (TU) permits for model homes, as defined in the Collier County 14 Land Development Code, may be allowed anywhere within the Estates-Mixed Use 15 District. Conditional use permits for the purpose of extending the time period for 16 use of the structure as a model home shall be required, and shall be subject to the 17 provisions of Section 5.04.04B. and C. of the Collier County Land Development 18 Code, Ordinance No. 04-41, as amended. Such conditional uses shall not be 19 subject to the locational criteria of the Conditional Uses Subdistrict, and may be 20 allowed anywhere within the Estates-Mixed Use District. 21 2. Conditional Use permits for excavation, as provided for in the Estates zoning 22 district, are not subject to the locational criteria for Conditional Uses and may be 23 allowed anywhere within the Estates-Mixed Use District. 24 3. Conditional Use for a church or place of worship, as provided for in the Estates 25 zoning district, is allowed on Tract 22, Golden Gate Estates, Unit 97 (See Special 26 Exception to Conditional Use Location Criteria Map). 27 4. Conditional Use for a church or place of worship as allowed in the Estates 28 Zoning District is allowed on the north 180 feet of Tract 107, Unit 30, Golden Gate 29 Estates. Church-related day care use shall not be allowed. Development shall be 30 limited to a maximum of 12,000 square feet of floor area (See Special Exception 31 to Conditional Use Location Criteria Map). 32 5. Conditional Use for a cellular tower may be is allowed anywhere in the Estates 33 Zoning District only on parcels no smaller than 2.25 acres and adjacent to a 34 roadway classified within the Transportation Element as a Collector or Arterial. 35 36 4. Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict 37 This Subdistrict is specific to Tracts 43, 50, 59, and 66 of Golden Gate Estates Unit 30, and 38 includes four parcels of land containing approximately 16.3 acres, located on the north side 39 of Golden Gate Parkway, east of I-75 and west of Santa Barbara Boulevard. The intent of the 40 Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict is to provide for the continued operation of 41 existing uses, and the development and redevelopment of institutional and related uses. The 42 Subdistrict is intended to be compatible with the neighboring residential uses and will utilize 43 well-planned access points to ensure safe and convenient access onto Golden Gate Parkway. 44 45 The following institutional uses are permitted through the conditional use process within the 46 Subdistrict: 47 9.A.3.i Packet Pg. 529 Attachment: Transmittal_Staff Report_Attchmnt_A (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed GMP Amendments Draft Golden Gate Area Master Plan – BCC Transmittal 07/20/2018 40 | P a g e Words underlined are added, words double underline are added as CCPC recommendations, words struck through are deleted, words double struck through are deleted as CCPC recommendations. a. Churches and other places of worship. 1 b. Group care facilities (Categories I and II) 2 c. Nursing homes and assisted living facilities associated with the David Lawrence 3 Center. 4 d. Essential services as set forth in Section 2.01.03 of the Collier County Land 5 Development Code, Ordinance Number No. 04-41, as amended. 6 e. Private schools associated with the David Lawrence Center or Parkway Community 7 Church of God, for Tracts 43, 50 and 59 only. 8 f. Day care centers associated with the David Lawrence Center or Parkway Community 9 Church of God. 10 g. Medical offices associated with the David Lawrence Center. 11 5. Mission Subdistrict 12 The Mission Subdistrict is located on the south side of Oil Well Road, approximately one -13 quarter mile west of Everglades Boulevard, and consists of 21.72 acres. The purpose of this 14 Subdistrict is to provide for churches and related uses, including community outreach. The 15 following uses are allowed: 16 a. Churches. 17 b. Child care centers – must be not-for-profit and affiliated with a church within the 18 Subdistrict. 19 c. Private schools – must be not-for-profit and affiliated with a church within the 20 Subdistrict. 21 d. Individual and family social services (activity centers, elderly or handicapped only; day 22 care centers, adult and handicapped only) – must be not-for-profit and affiliated with a 23 church within the Subdistrict. 24 e. Medical outreach to the community, to include activities such as administering 25 influenza vaccine, checking blood pressure, and conducting blood donation drives – 26 must be not-for-profit and affiliated with a church within the Subdistrict. Soup kitchens 27 and homeless shelters are prohibited in this Subdistrict. 28 The maximum total floor area allowed in this Subdistrict is 90,000 square feet. The 29 maximum height of buildings shall be 30 feet zoned height, except the worship center 30 shall be permitted a zoned height of 35 feet. Development in this Subdistrict shall be 31 designed to be compatible with the existing, and allowed future, development in the 32 surrounding area. 33 34 In the alternate to the foregoing uses, measures of development intensity, and development 35 standards, this Subdistrict may be developed with single family dwellings in accordance with 36 the Residential Estates Subdistrict. 37 Property adjacent to this Subdistrict shall not qualify for the Transitional Conditional Use. 38 6. Everglades – Randall Subdistrict 39 The Everglades – Randall Subdistrict is located on the northeast corner of Everglades 40 Boulevard and Randall Boulevard, consists of 7.8 acres, and comprises Tract 115 and the 41 east 150 feet of Tract 116, Unit 69, Golden Gate Estates. The purpose of this Subdistrict is to 42 provide for churches and other places of worship and their related uses. 43 44 The following use is permitted within the Subdistrict through the conditional use process: 45 a. Churches and other places of worship 46 9.A.3.i Packet Pg. 530 Attachment: Transmittal_Staff Report_Attchmnt_A (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed GMP Amendments Draft Golden Gate Area Master Plan – BCC Transmittal 07/20/2018 41 | P a g e Words underlined are added, words double underline are added as CCPC recommendations, words struck through are deleted, words double struck through are deleted as CCPC recommendations. The following church-related uses are prohibited within the Subdistrict: 1 a. Day care centers 2 b. Private schools 3 c. Soup kitchens 4 d. Homeless shelters 5 The maximum total floor area allowed in this Subdistrict is 20,000 square feet, including no 6 more than 230 seats. The maximum height of buildings shall be 30 feet. Architectural features 7 such as steeples may be a maximum height of 60 feet. 8 For access drives, a throat depth of no less than 30 feet, measured from the roadway edge 9 of the pavement, shall be provided. 10 11 B. Estates – Commercial District 12 13 1. Interchange Activity Center Subdistrict 14 On the fringes of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan boundaries, there are several parcels 15 that are located within the Interchange Activity Center #10 at I-75 and Pine Ridge Road as 16 detailed in the County-wide Future Land Use Element (FLUE). Parcels within this Activity 17 Center are subject to the County-wide FLUE and not this Master Plan. See Activity Center 18 and Pine Ridge Road Mixed Use Subdistrict Map for a detailed map of this Activity Center. 19 2. Pine Ridge Road Mixed Use Subdistrict 20 This Subdistrict is adjacent to the northwest quadrant of Interchange Activity Center #10, west 21 of the Naples Gateway PUD, and comprises 16.23 acres. It consists of Tracts 1, 12, 13 and 22 28 of Golden Gate Estates, Unit 35, as recorded in Plat Book 7, Page 85, of the Public Records 23 of Collier County. The intent of the Pine Ridge Road Mixed Use Subdistrict is to allow for a 24 mix of both retail and office uses to provide for shopping and personal services for the 25 surrounding residential areas within a convenient travel distance and to provide commercial 26 services appropriately located along a collector roadway, Livingston Road. Well-planned 27 access points will be used to improve current and future traffic flows in the area. Within this 28 Subdistrict no more than 35,000 square feet of office-related uses on +3.2 acres are permitted 29 within the eastern 30 31 portion of this property, which includes a portion of Tract 28 and a portion of Tract 13. A 32 maximum of 80,000 square feet of gross leasable retail or office area, as allowed in the 33 Commercial Intermediate District (C-3) of the Collier County Land Development Code in 34 effect as of the effective date of the adoption of this Subdistrict [Ordinance No. 03-01, 35 adopted January 16, 2003], are permitted within the western 10.52 acres of this property. 36 The C-3 uses are not an entitlement. Such uses will be further evaluated at the time of 37 rezoning application to insure appropriateness in relationship to surrounding properties. 38 A rezoning of the western 10.52 acres is encouraged to be in the form of a Planned Unit 39 Development. Regulations for water management, uniform landscaping, signage, screening 40 and buffering will be included in the rezoning ordinance to ensure compatibility with nearby 41 residential areas, and shall be subject to the following additional criteria: 42 a. There shall be no access onto Livingston Woods Lane. 43 b. Shared access shall be encouraged. 44 c. Building heights shall not exceed 35 feet. 45 9.A.3.i Packet Pg. 531 Attachment: Transmittal_Staff Report_Attchmnt_A (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed GMP Amendments Draft Golden Gate Area Master Plan – BCC Transmittal 07/20/2018 42 | P a g e Words underlined are added, words double underline are added as CCPC recommendations, words struck through are deleted, words double struck through are deleted as CCPC recommendations. d. There shall be a minimum setback area of 75 feet along the northern property line. 1 e. Driveway access, parking, and water management facilities may be allowed within the 2 75-foot setback area along the northern property line, but none of these uses shall be 3 located closer than 30 feet to this line. 4 f. No freestanding automobile parking lots, homeless shelters or soup kitchens shall be 5 permitted. 6 g. Within the eastern portion of Tract 28, 2.2 acres, more or less, shall be preserved as 7 wetlands and no development shall occur within that area. 8 h. Within the western 10.52 acres, a loop road shall be constructed through the property 9 to provide access from Pine Ridge Road to Livingston Road and to reduce traffic at the 10 intersection. 11 See Activity Center and Pine Ridge Road Mixed Use Subdistrict Map for a detailed map of 12 this Subdistrict. 13 14 3. Randall Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict 15 The Randall Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict, containing approximately 56.5 acres, is 16 located on the south side of Randall Boulevard and Immokalee Road (CR-846), extending 17 from 8th Street NE west to the Corkscrew Canal. This Subdistrict is comprised of the following 18 properties: Tracts 54, 55, 71, 72, 89, 90, 107, 108, 125, 126 and 127, Golden Gate Estates, 19 Unit 23. This Subdistrict has been designated on the Golden Gate Area Future Land Use Map 20 and the Randall Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict Map. It is the intent of this Subdistrict to 21 provide commercial goods and services to the surrounding area. 22 All development in the Subdistrict shall comply with the following requirements and limitations: 23 a. All development is encouraged to be in the form of a PUD. 24 b. Projects directly abutting Estates zoned property shall provide, at a minimum, a 75-25 foot wide buffer of retained native vegetation in which no parking or water management 26 uses are permitted; except that, when abutting conditional uses no such buffer is 27 required. 28 c. Shared parking shall be required with adjoining development whenever possible. 29 d. Tract 55 shall only be utilized for native preservation and water management areas. 30 The eastern boundary of Tract 55 shall contain, at a minimum, a 50-foot wide retained 31 native vegetation buffer. 32 e. The following limitation shall apply to Tract 71 only: 33 i. Limitation of Uses – Uses shall be limited to the following: 34 a. Automobile Service Station; 35 b. Barber & Beauty Shops; 36 c. Convenience Stores; 37 d. Drug Stores; 38 e. Food Markets; 39 f. Hardware Stores; 40 g. Laundries – Self Service Only; 41 h. Parks, Public or Private; 42 i. Post Offices and Professional Offices; 43 j. Repair Shops – Radio, TV, Small Appliances and Shoes; 44 k. Restaurants, including fast food restaurants but not drive in restaurants; 45 9.A.3.i Packet Pg. 532 Attachment: Transmittal_Staff Report_Attchmnt_A (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed GMP Amendments Draft Golden Gate Area Master Plan – BCC Transmittal 07/20/2018 43 | P a g e Words underlined are added, words double underline are added as CCPC recommendations, words struck through are deleted, words double struck through are deleted as CCPC recommendations. l. All Permitted Uses of the C-2, Convenience Commercial, zoning district 1 in the Collier County Land Development Code, Ordinance No. 04-41, as 2 amended, as of April 14, 2009; and, 3 m. Veterinary Clinic with no outside kenneling; 4 f. The following limitations shall apply to Tracts 72, 89, 90, 107, 108, 125, 126, 127, and 5 Tract 54: 6 i. Development intensity on Tracts 72, 89, 90, 107, 108, 125, 126, 127 and the 7 west one-half of Tract 54 shall be limited to 360,950 square feet of floor area, 8 of which no more than 285,950 square feet shall be retail development. 9 ii. Development intensity on the east one-half of Tract 54 shall be limited to 10 20,000 square feet of commercial development. 11 iii. The first phase of the project development, exclusive of the existing 20,000 sq. 12 ft. of development on the east one-half of Tract 54, shall include a grocery 13 anchor, with a minimum of 35,000 square feet of gross leasable floor area, prior 14 to any certificates of occupancy being issued beyond 100,000 square feet of 15 commercial development. 16 iv. Allowable uses shall be limited to the permitted and conditional uses of the C-17 4, General Commercial District in the Collier County Land Development Code 18 in effect as of the effective date of the adoption of the amendment of this 19 Subdistrict [Ordinance No. 2010 -32, adopted July 28, 2010], except that the 20 following uses shall be prohibited: 21 a. Tire Dealers, Automotive Retail (Group 5531) 22 b. Automotive Parking (Group 7521) 23 c. Communication Services (Group 4899) 24 d. Drinking Places (Group 5813) 25 e. Fishing Piers (Group 7999) 26 f. Glass and Glazing work (Group 1793) 27 g. Health Services (Groups 8059 - 8069) 28 h. Specialty Outpatient Facilities (Group 8093) 29 i. Houseboat Rental, Lakes Operations, Party and Pleasure Boat rental 30 (Group 7999) 31 j. Large Appliance repair service (Group 7623) 32 k. Marinas (Group 4493 and 4499) 33 l. Miscellaneous Repair Services (Groups 7622-7641, 7699) 34 m. Liquor Store, unless operated by a Grocery Retailer (Group 5921) 35 n. Used Merchandise Store (Group 5932) 36 o. Automatic Merchandising Machine Operators (Group 5962) 37 p. Direct Selling Establishment (Group 5963) 38 q. Escort Services, Massage Parlors, Tattoo Parlors, Turkish Baths, 39 Wedding Chapels (Group 7299) 40 r. Betting Information Services, Bath Houses, Billiard Parlors, Bookies and 41 Bookmakers, Cable lifts, Carnival Operation, Circus Companies, Fortune 42 Tellers, Go-cart racing operation, Off-track betting, Ping Pong Parlors, 43 Rodeo Animal Rentals, Rodeos, Shooting Ranges, Trapshooting 44 Facilities (Group 7999) 45 9.A.3.i Packet Pg. 533 Attachment: Transmittal_Staff Report_Attchmnt_A (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed GMP Amendments Draft Golden Gate Area Master Plan – BCC Transmittal 07/20/2018 44 | P a g e Words underlined are added, words double underline are added as CCPC recommendations, words struck through are deleted, words double struck through are deleted as CCPC recommendations. s. Parole offices, Probation offices, Public welfare centers, refugee 1 services, settlement houses (Group 8322) 2 t. Tow-in parking lots (Groups 7514, 7515, 7521) 3 u. Animal Specialty Services (Group 0752) 4 v. At time of rezoning, consideration shall be given to imposing appropriate 5 restrictions on the amount of development allowed in this Subdistrict prior to 6 discontinuance and relocation of the Big Corkscrew Island Fire Station and 7 Florida Division of Forestry fire tower uses. 8 vi. All buildings on Tracts 72, 89, 90, 107, 108, 125, 126 and 127 shall be 9 developed with a unified architectural theme. 10 vii. Excluding the commercial zoning on Tract 71 and the existing approved 11 commercial zoning on the east one-half of Tract 54, any additional 12 development in the Subdistrict shall be developed in phases. Phase I shall be 13 limited to 100,000 square feet of gross leasable floor area. Subsequent phases 14 shall not receive building permits until the Randall Boulevard/Immokalee Road 15 intersection project, including the widening of the segment of Randall 16 Boulevard abutting the Subdistrict, as shown on Exhibit “A” of the Developer 17 Contribution Agreement adopted July 28, 2010 by the Board of County 18 Commissioners, has commenced. No Certificates of Occupancy shall be 19 issued for subsequent development phases until the Randall 20 Boulevard/Immokalee Road intersection project is substantially complete. 21 Neither the building permits limitations nor the Certificates of Occupancy 22 limitations shall apply if satisfactory alternative mitigation is approved by the 23 Board of County Commissioners pursuant to Transportation Element Policy 24 5.1, or if traffic conditions change in such a manner that adequate capacity is 25 available. 26 27 4. Commercial Western Estates Infill Subdistrict 28 The purpose of the Subdistrict is to allow for limited commercial and/or medical office uses, in 29 recognition of the subject property's unsuitability for single-family residential development. 30 Limited commercial and/or medical uses at this location will also assist in reducing the 31 distance and the number of vehicular trips generated within the general area through trip 32 capture. The standards contained in this Subdistrict are designed to ensure that uses within 33 the Subdistrict will be compatible with nearby residential development. A loop road shall be 34 required through the property to connect Vanderbilt Beach Road with Collier Boulevard will 35 also serve to lessen vehicular trips through the intersection. 36 37 a. Size and Location: 38 The Subdistrict includes a 6.23-acre parcel, located at the southwest corner of 39 Vanderbilt Beach Road and Collier Boulevard (see Commercial Western Estates Infill 40 Subdistrict Map). The parcel is identified as Tract 105, Unit 2, Golden Gate Estates. 41 b. Permitted Uses and Development Intensity: 42 Within the subject property, 3.93 acres of office/medical use is permitted with a 43 maximum of forty-one thousand four hundred and ninety (41,490) square feet of gross 44 leasable area permitted or approximately 6,660 square feet per gross acre. The 45 balance of the area, comprising +2.3 acres, shall remain in open space. Uses allowed 46 within this Subdistrict shall be those office uses, medical uses, and financial institutions 47 permitted whether by right or by conditional use, within the C-1 zoning district, as 48 9.A.3.i Packet Pg. 534 Attachment: Transmittal_Staff Report_Attchmnt_A (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed GMP Amendments Draft Golden Gate Area Master Plan – BCC Transmittal 07/20/2018 45 | P a g e Words underlined are added, words double underline are added as CCPC recommendations, words struck through are deleted, words double struck through are deleted as CCPC recommendations. contained in the Collier County Land Development Code, Ordinance 91-102, as of the 1 effective date of the adoption of this Subdistrict [Ordinance No. 03-01, adopted 2 January 16, 2003]. 3 c. Development Standards: 4 1. All permitted uses within this Subdistrict shall be encouraged to be submitted 5 in the form of a Planned Unit Development (P.U.D.) for the subject property 6 with special attention to be provided for shared access, water management, 7 uniform landscaping, signage, screening and buffering to ensure compatibility 8 with nearby residential areas. 9 2. Building height shall be limited to two stories, with a maximum height of thirty 10 (30) feet, except that portions of the property within one hundred (100) feet of 11 the buffer described in item #3, below, shall be limited to one story with a 12 maximum height of twenty-five (25) feet. 13 3. There shall be a setback of seventy-five (75) feet in width abutting Estates-14 zoned property. Where feasible, existing native vegetation shall be retained 15 within this setback area. Water retention/detention areas shall be allowed in 16 this setback area provided that the area is left in a natural state, and drainage 17 conveyance through the setback area shall be allowed, as necessary, in order 18 for stormwater to reach an external outfall. 19 4. The buffer area along Collier Boulevard/CR-951 and Vanderbilt Beach Road 20 shall be 25 feet in width and shall conform to the vegetative requirements of a 21 Type "B" buffer as provided for in the Collier County Land Development Code, 22 in effect as of the date of adoption of this amendment [Ordinance No. 03-01, 23 adopted January 16, 2003]. 24 5. A loop road shall be constructed, internal to the subject property. This road 25 shall be open to the public, in order to connect Vanderbilt Beach Road and 26 Collier Boulevard, so as to provide an alternative to use of the intersection. 27 6. The maximum gross leasable floor area of each individual 28 office/medical/financial building footprint shall be 6,000 square feet. However, 29 buildings may be connected by architectural treatments, and shall be designed 30 to appear similar to residential structures through the treatment of rooflines and 31 other architectural embellishments. 32 7. No development of property within the Subdistrict shall commence until the 33 abutting segment of Collier Boulevard is four-laned. 34 35 5. Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict 36 This Subdistrict consists of two infill areas. The two areas are located at the northwest corner 37 of Collier Boulevard and Green Boulevard and at the northwest corner of Santa Barbara 38 Boulevard and Golden Gate Parkway. Due to the existing zoning and land use pattern in 39 proximity to the Estates Commercial In-fill Subdistrict (see Golden Gate Urban Commercial 40 Infill Subdistrict and Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict Map) and the need to 41 ensure adequate development standards to buffer adjacent land uses, commercial uses shall 42 be permitted under the following criteria: 43 a. Commercial uses shall be limited to: 44 1. Low intensity commercial uses that are compatible with both residential and 45 intermediate commercial uses, in order to provide for small scale shopping and 46 personal needs, and 47 9.A.3.i Packet Pg. 535 Attachment: Transmittal_Staff Report_Attchmnt_A (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed GMP Amendments Draft Golden Gate Area Master Plan – BCC Transmittal 07/20/2018 46 | P a g e Words underlined are added, words double underline are added as CCPC recommendations, words struck through are deleted, words double struck through are deleted as CCPC recommendations. 2. Intermediate commercial to provide for a wider variety of goods and services 1 in areas that have a higher degree of automobile traffic. These uses shall be 2 similar to C-1, C-2, or C-3 zoning districts outlined in the Collier County Land 3 Development Code (Ordinance 91-102), adopted October 30, 1991. 4 b. Rezones shall be encouraged in the form of a Planned Unit Development (there shall 5 be no minimum acreage requirement for PUD rezones except for the requirement that 6 all requests for rezoning must be at least forty thousand (40,000) square feet in area 7 unless the proposed rezone is an extension of an existing zoning district consistent 8 with the Golden Gate Area Master Plan). 9 c. Projects within this Subdistrict shall make provisions for shared parking arrangements 10 with adjoining commercial developments when appropriate. 11 d. Driveways and curb cuts for projects within this Subdistrict shall be consolidated with 12 adjoining commercial developments. 13 e. Access to projects shall not be permitted from Collier Boulevard. 14 f. Any project located within this Subdistrict at the northwest corner of Golden Gate 15 Parkway and Santa Barbara Boulevard, less and except an easement for Santa 16 Barbara Boulevard right-of-way, shall be subject to the following additional 17 development restrictions: 18 1. The site shall be limited to thirty-five thousand (35,000) square feet of building 19 area. 20 2. Land uses shall be restricted to offices only. 21 3. All principal structures shall be required to have a minimum setback of one 22 hundred (100) feet from the project's northern boundary. 23 4. The northern seventy-five (75) feet of the western sixty (60) percent of the site 24 shall be a green area (open space area). It shall be utilized for only water 25 management facilities, landscape buffers, and similar uses. 26 5. The western sixty (60) percent of the site shall have an outdoor pedestrian-27 friendly patio(s), that total at least five hundred (500) square feet in area and 28 incorporate a minimum of: benches or seating areas for at least twelve (12) 29 persons, and vegetative shading, and a waterfall or water feature of at least 30 one hundred (100) square feet in area, and brick pavers. 31 6. A twenty-five (25) foot wide landscaped strip shall be provided along the entire 32 frontage of both Golden Gate Parkway and Santa Barbara Boulevard. 33 7. A minimum buffer of thirty-five (35) feet in width shall be provided along the 34 project's western boundary and along the eastern forty (40) percent of the 35 project's northern boundary. A minimum buffer of fifty (50) feet in width shall 36 be provided along the western sixty (60) percent of the project's northern 37 boundary. Where feasible, existing native vegetation shall be retained within 38 these buffers along the project's western and northern boundaries. These 39 buffers shall be supplemented with Oak or Mahogany trees planted a maximum 40 of twenty (20) feet apart in a staggered manner; and a seven (7) foot wall, 41 fence, or hedge that will, within two (2) years of planting, grow to a minimum 42 height of seven (7) feet and be a minimum of ninety-five (95) percent opaque. 43 8. All buildings shall have tile or metal roofs, or decorative parapet walls above 44 the roofline, and buildings shall be finished in light subdued colors except for 45 decorative trim. 46 9. Building heights shall be limited to one (1)-story and a maximum of thirty-five 47 (35) feet. 48 9.A.3.i Packet Pg. 536 Attachment: Transmittal_Staff Report_Attchmnt_A (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed GMP Amendments Draft Golden Gate Area Master Plan – BCC Transmittal 07/20/2018 47 | P a g e Words underlined are added, words double underline are added as CCPC recommendations, words struck through are deleted, words double struck through are deleted as CCPC recommendations. 10. All lighting facilities shall be architecturally designed and limited to a height of 1 twenty-five (25) feet. Such lighting facilities shall be shielded from neighboring 2 residential land uses. 3 11. There shall be no ingress or egress on Santa Barbara Boulevard. 4 6. Estates Shopping Center Subdistrict 5 Recognizing the need to provide for centrally located basic goods and services within a portion 6 Northern Golden Gate Estates, the Estates Shopping Center Subdistrict has been designated 7 on the Golden Gate Area Future Land Use Map. 8 The Subdistrict is located at the NW corner of Golden Gate Boulevard and Wilson Boulevard 9 westward to 3rd Street NW and extending northward to include the southern 180 feet of Tracts 10 142 and 106 of Unit 11 and the southern 255 feet of Tract 111 of Unit 11 of Golden Gate 11 Estates, totaling approximately 41 acres. 12 The Estates Shopping Center Subdistrict is intended to provide convenient shopping, 13 personal services and employment for the central areas of Northern Golden Gate Estates. 14 Commercial development in this Subdistrict will reduce driving distances for many residents, 15 assist in minimizing the road network required, and reduce traffic impacts in this area of Collier 16 County. 17 18 All development in this Subdistrict shall comply with the following requirements and limitations: 19 20 a. Allowable Uses, as identified with a number from the Standard Industrial Classification 21 Manual, shall be limited to the following: 22 1. Amusement and recreation 23 Groups 7911 – Dance studios, schools and halls, excluding discotheques 24 7991 – Physical fitness facilities 25 7999 – Amusement and recreation services, not elsewhere classified, 26 allowing only day camps, gymnastics instruction, judo/karate 27 instruction, sporting goods rental and yoga instruction 28 2. Apparel and accessory stores (no adult-oriented sales) 29 Groups 5611 – Men’s and boys’ clothing and accessory stores 30 5621 – Women’s clothing stores 31 5632 – Women’s accessory and specialty stores 32 5641 – Children’s and infants’ wear stores 33 5651 – Family clothing stores 34 5661 – Shoe stores 35 5699 – Miscellaneous apparel and accessory stores 36 3. Automotive dealers and gasoline service stations 37 Groups 5531 – Auto and home supply stores 38 4. Automotive repair, services and parking (No outdoor repair/service. All 39 repairs/services to be performed by authorized automotive technician.) 40 Groups 7514 – Passenger car rental 41 5. Building materials, hardware, garden supply, and mobile home dealers 42 Groups 5231 – Paint, glass, and wallpaper stores 43 5251 – Hardware stores 44 9.A.3.i Packet Pg. 537 Attachment: Transmittal_Staff Report_Attchmnt_A (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed GMP Amendments Draft Golden Gate Area Master Plan – BCC Transmittal 07/20/2018 48 | P a g e Words underlined are added, words double underline are added as CCPC recommendations, words struck through are deleted, words double struck through are deleted as CCPC recommendations. 5261 – Retail nurseries, lawn and garden supply stores 1 6. Business services 2 Groups 7334 – Photocopying and duplicating services 3 7335 – Commercial photography 4 7336 – Commercial art and graphic design 5 7338 – Secretarial and court reporting services 6 7342 – Disinfecting and pest control services 7 7352 – Medical equipment rental and leasing 8 7359 – Equipment rental and leasing, not elsewhere classified, 9 excluding the following uses: airplane rental and leasing; coin 10 operated machine rental and leasing; industrial truck rental and 11 leasing; oil field equipment rental and leasing; oil well drilling 12 equipment rental; leasing; toilets, portable – rental and leasing; 13 and vending machines – rental only 14 7371 – Computer programming services 15 7372 – Prepackaged software 16 7373 – Computer integrated systems design 17 7374 – Computer processing and data preparation and processing 18 services 19 7375 – Information retrieval services 20 7376 – Computer facilities management services 21 7379 – Computer related services, not elsewhere classified 22 7382 – Security systems services 23 7383 – News syndicates 24 7384 – Photofinishing laboratories 25 7389 – Business services, not elsewhere classified 26 7. Communications 27 Groups 4812 – Radiotelephone communications 28 4841 – Cable and other pay television services 29 8. Construction, special trade contractors (office use only, no on-site materials or 30 equipment storage) 31 Groups 1711 – Plumbing, heating and air-conditioning 32 1721 – Painting and paper hanging industry 33 1731 – Electrical work industry 34 1741 – Masonry, stone setting, and other stone work 35 1742 – Plastering, drywall, acoustical, and insulation work 36 1743 – Terrazzo, tile, marble, and mosaic work industry 37 1751 – Carpentry work 38 1752 – Floor laying and other floor work, not elsewhere classified 39 industry 40 1761 – Roofing, siding, and sheet metal work industry 41 1771 – Concrete work industry 42 1781 – Water well drilling industry 43 1791 – Structural steel erection 44 9.A.3.i Packet Pg. 538 Attachment: Transmittal_Staff Report_Attchmnt_A (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed GMP Amendments Draft Golden Gate Area Master Plan – BCC Transmittal 07/20/2018 49 | P a g e Words underlined are added, words double underline are added as CCPC recommendations, words struck through are deleted, words double struck through are deleted as CCPC recommendations. 1793 – Glass and glazing work 1 1794 – Excavation work 2 1795 – Wrecking and demolition work 3 1796 – Installation or erection of building equipment, not elsewhere 4 1799 – Special trade contractors, not elsewhere classified 5 9. Depository institutions 6 Groups 6021 – National commercial banks 7 6022 – State commercial banks 8 6029 – Commercial banks, not elsewhere classified 9 6035 – Savings institutions, federally chartered 10 6036 – Savings Institutions, not federally chartered 11 6061 – Credit unions, federally chartered 12 6062 – Credit unions, not federally chartered 13 6091 – Non-deposit trust facilities 14 6099 – Functions related to depository banking, not elsewhere 15 classified 16 10. Eating and drinking places (Group 5812, including only liquor service accessory to 17 the restaurant use, no outdoor music or televisions, and no windows or walls open 18 to the outside, except as required by code) 19 11.Engineering, accounting, research, management, and related services 20 Groups 8711 – Engineering services 21 8712 – Architectural services 22 8713 – Surveying services 23 8721 – Accounting, auditing, and bookkeeping services 24 8741 – Management services 25 8742 – Management consulting services 26 8743 – Public relations services 27 8748 – Business consulting services, not elsewhere classified 28 12. Executive, legislative, and general government, except finance 29 Groups 9111 – Executive offices 30 9121 – Legislative bodies 31 9131 – Executive and legislative offices combined 32 9199 – General government, not elsewhere classified 33 13. Food stores 34 Groups 5411 – Grocery stores (minimum 27,000 square feet) 35 5421 – Meat and fish (seafood) markets, including freezer provisioners 36 5431 – Fruit and vegetable markets 37 5441 – Candy, nut, and confectionery stores 38 5451 – Dairy products stores 39 5461 – Retail bakeries 40 5499 – Miscellaneous food stores, including convenience stores with 41 fuel pumps and carwash 42 14. General merchandise stores 43 9.A.3.i Packet Pg. 539 Attachment: Transmittal_Staff Report_Attchmnt_A (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed GMP Amendments Draft Golden Gate Area Master Plan – BCC Transmittal 07/20/2018 50 | P a g e Words underlined are added, words double underline are added as CCPC recommendations, words struck through are deleted, words double struck through are deleted as CCPC recommendations. Groups 5311 – Department stores 1 5331 – Variety stores 2 5399 – Miscellaneous general merchandise stores 3 15. Home furniture, furnishings, and equipment stores 4 Groups 5712 – Furniture stores 5 5713 – Floor covering stores 6 5714 – Drapery, curtain, and upholstery stores 7 5719 – Miscellaneous home furnishings stores 8 5722 – Household appliance stores 9 5731 – Radio, television, and consumer electronics stores 10 5734 – Computer and computer software stores 11 5735 – Record and prerecorded tape stores (no adult oriented sales) 12 5736 – Musical instrument store 13 16. Insurance carriers 14 Groups 6311 – Life insurance 15 6321 – Accident and health insurance 16 6324 – Hospital and medical service plans 17 6331 – Fire, marine, and casualty insurance 18 6351 – Surety insurance 19 6361 – Title insurance 20 6371 – Pension, health and welfare funds 21 6399 – Insurance carriers, not elsewhere classified 22 6411 – Insurance agents 23 17. Justice, public order and safety 24 Groups 9221 – Police protection 25 9222 – Legal counsel and prosecution 26 9229 – Public order and safety, not elsewhere classified 27 18. Meeting and banquet rooms 28 19. Miscellaneous retail (no adult-oriented sales) 29 Groups 5912 – Drug stores and proprietary stores 30 5921 – Liquor stores (accessory to grocery or pharmacy only) 31 5932 – Used merchandise stores 32 5941 – Sporting goods stores and bicycle shops 33 5942 – Book stores 34 5943 – Stationery stores 35 5944 – Jewelry stores, including repair 36 5945 – Hobby, toy, and game shops 37 5946 – Camera and photographic supply stores 38 5947 – Gift, novelty, and souvenir shops 39 5948 – Luggage and leather goods stores 40 5949 – Sewing, needlework, and piece goods stores 41 5992 – Florists 42 5993 – Tobacco stores and stands 43 9.A.3.i Packet Pg. 540 Attachment: Transmittal_Staff Report_Attchmnt_A (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed GMP Amendments Draft Golden Gate Area Master Plan – BCC Transmittal 07/20/2018 51 | P a g e Words underlined are added, words double underline are added as CCPC recommendations, words struck through are deleted, words double struck through are deleted as CCPC recommendations. 5994 – News dealers and newsstands 1 5995 – Optical goods stores 2 5999 – Miscellaneous retail stores, not elsewhere classified (excluding 3 gravestone, tombstones, auction rooms, monuments, 4 swimming pools, and sales barns) 5 20. Non-depository credit institutions 6 Groups 6111 – Federal and federally-sponsored credit agencies 7 6141 – Personal credit institutions 8 6153 – Short-term business credit institutions, except agricultural 9 6159 – Miscellaneous business credit institutions 10 6162 – Mortgage bankers and loan correspondents 11 6163 – Loan brokers 12 21. Offices and clinics of dentist (Group 8021) 13 22. Personal services 14 Groups 7212 – Garment pressing, and agents for laundries and drycleaners 15 7221 – Photographic studios, portrait 16 7231 – Beauty shops 17 7241 – Barber shops 18 7251 – Shoe repair shops and shoeshine parlors 19 7291 – Tax return preparation services 20 7299 – Miscellaneous personal services, not elsewhere classified, 21 excluding massage parlors, Turkish baths and escort services 22 23. Public finance, taxation, and monetary policy (Group 9311) 23 24 24. Real Estate 25 Groups 6512 – Operators of nonresidential buildings 26 6513 – Operators of apartment buildings 27 6514 – Operators of dwellings other than apartment buildings 28 6515 – Operators of residential mobile home sites 29 6517 – Lessors of railroad property 30 6519 – Lessors of real property, not elsewhere classified 31 6531 – Real estate agents and managers 32 6541 – Title abstract offices 33 6552 – Land subdividers and developers, except cemeteries 34 25. Schools and educational services, not elsewhere classified (Group 8299) 35 26. Security and commodity brokers, dealers, exchanges, and services 36 Groups 6211 – Security brokers, dealers, and flotation companies 37 6221 – Commodity contracts brokers and dealers 38 6231 – Security and commodity exchanges 39 6282 – Investment advice 40 6289 – Services allied with the exchange of securities or commodities, 41 not elsewhere classified 42 27. Social services 43 Groups 8322 – Individual and family social services (adult day care centers 44 9.A.3.i Packet Pg. 541 Attachment: Transmittal_Staff Report_Attchmnt_A (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed GMP Amendments Draft Golden Gate Area Master Plan – BCC Transmittal 07/20/2018 52 | P a g e Words underlined are added, words double underline are added as CCPC recommendations, words struck through are deleted, words double struck through are deleted as CCPC recommendations. only) 1 8351 – Child day care services 2 28. Travel agencies (Group 4724) 3 29. Veterinary services for animal specialties (Group 0742, excluding outside 4 kenneling) 5 30. Video tape rental (Group 7841, excluding adult oriented sales and rentals) 6 31. United states postal service (Group 4311, excluding major distribution centers) 7 32. Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of 8 permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals (“BZA”) 9 by the process outlined in the LDC. 10 11 b. Accessory Uses: 12 Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal 13 uses and structures, including, but not limited to: 14 1. Utility buildings (including water and wastewater plants) which shall be enclosed 15 2. Essential service facilities 16 3. Gazebos, statuary and other architectural features 17 4. Utilities, water and wastewater facilities and/or plants (all processing plants must 18 be enclosed) 19 5. Alcohol service for outdoor dining shall only be accessory to food service 20 c. Operational Standards 21 1. Outdoor music is prohibited 22 23 d. The following uses, as identified with a number from the Standard Industrial 24 Classification Manual, shall be prohibited: 25 1. Amusement and recreation services, not elsewhere classified (Group 7999, 26 except those uses expressly listed above in a.1 are permitted) 27 2. Air and water resource and solid waste management (Group 9511) 28 3. Business Services 29 Groups 7313 – Radio, television, and publishers’ advertising 30 representatives 31 7331 – Direct mail advertising services 32 4. Correctional Institutions (Group 9223) 33 5. Drinking places (alcoholic beverages) (Group 5813) 34 6. Educational services 35 Groups 8211 – Elementary and secondary schools 36 8221 – Colleges, universities, and professional schools 37 8222 – Junior colleges and technical institutes 38 8231 – Libraries 39 7. Health services 40 Groups 8062 – General medical and surgical hospitals 41 8063 – Psychiatric hospitals 42 8069 – Specialty hospitals, except psychiatric 43 8. Miscellaneous Retail 44 Groups 5921 – Liquor stores 45 9.A.3.i Packet Pg. 542 Attachment: Transmittal_Staff Report_Attchmnt_A (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed GMP Amendments Draft Golden Gate Area Master Plan – BCC Transmittal 07/20/2018 53 | P a g e Words underlined are added, words double underline are added as CCPC recommendations, words struck through are deleted, words double struck through are deleted as CCPC recommendations. 5961 – Catalog and mail-order houses 1 5962 – Automatic merchandising machine operators 2 9. Personal services 3 Groups 7211 – Power Laundries, family and commercial 4 7261 – Funeral service and crematories 5 10. Social services 6 Groups 8322 – Individual and family social services, excluding adult day care 7 centers 8 8361 – Residential care, including soup kitchens and homeless 9 shelters 10 e. Development intensity shall be limited to 190,000 square feet of gross leasable floor 11 area. 12 f. No commercial use shall exceed fifteen thousand (15,000) square feet, except for a 13 single grocery store use between twenty-seven thousand (27,000) and sixty thousand 14 (60,000) square feet in size, a single commercial use of up to thirty thousand (30,000) 15 square feet in size, and a single commercial use of up to twenty thousand (20,000) 16 square feet in size. 17 g. No building may exceed 30,000 square feet in size, except for the grocery anchored 18 building with inline stores. 19 h. Development within this Subdistrict shall be phased, and the following commitments 20 related to area roadway improvements shall be completed within the specified 21 timeframes: 22 1. Right-of-Way for Golden Gate Boulevard Expansion and Right-of-Way for the 23 Wilson Boulevard Expansion will be donated to the County at no cost within 120 24 days of a written request from the County. 25 2. The owner will pay its fair share for the intersection improvements at Wilson 26 Boulevard and Golden Gate Boulevard within 90 days of County request for 27 reimbursement. 28 3. Until the intersection improvements at Golden Gate Boulevard and Wilson 29 Boulevard are complete, the County shall not issue a Certificate(s) of Occupancy 30 (CO) for more than 100,000 square feet of development. The applicant must 31 obtain a C.O. for a grocery store as part of this 100,000 square feet, and the 32 grocery store must be the first C.O. obtained. 33 i. Rezoning is encouraged to be in the form of a Planned Unit Development (PUD), and 34 the rezone ordinance must contain development standards to ensure that all 35 commercial land uses will be compatible with neighboring residential uses. 36 This subdistrict includes a conceptual plan, which identifies the location of the 37 permitted development area and required preserve area for this subdistrict. The 38 preserve area depicted on the conceptual plan shall satisfy all comprehensive plan 39 requirements for retained native vegetation, including but not limited to the 40 requirements of Policy 6.1.1 of the CCME. A more detailed development plan must 41 be developed and utilized for the required PUD rezoning. 42 9.A.3.i Packet Pg. 543 Attachment: Transmittal_Staff Report_Attchmnt_A (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed GMP Amendments Draft Golden Gate Area Master Plan – BCC Transmittal 07/20/2018 54 | P a g e Words underlined are added, words double underline are added as CCPC recommendations, words struck through are deleted, words double struck through are deleted as CCPC recommendations. j. Development standards, including permitted uses and setbacks for principal buildings 1 shall be established at the time of PUD rezoning. Any future PUD rezone shall include 2 at a minimum: 3 1. Landscape buffers adjacent to external rights-of-way shall be: 4 a. 1st/3rd Streets ‒ Minimum 30’ wide enhanced buffer 5 b. Wilson Boulevard ‒ Minimum 25’ wide enhanced buffer 6 c. Golden Gate Boulevard ‒ Minimum 50’ wide enhanced buffer 7 2. Except for the utility building, no commercial building may be constructed within 8 125 feet of the northern property boundary and within 300’ of the 3rd Street NW 9 boundary of this subdistrict. 10 3. Any portion of the Project directly abutting residential property (property zoned E-11 Estates and without an approved conditional use) shall provide, at a minimum, a 12 seventy-five (75) feet wide buffer, except the westernmost 330’ of Tract 106, which 13 shall provide a minimum 20’ wide buffer in which no parking uses are 14 permitted. Twenty-five (25) feet of the width of the buffer along the developed area 15 shall be a landscape buffer. A minimum of fifty (50) feet of the buffer width shall 16 consist of retained or re-planted native vegetation and must be consistent with 17 subsection 3.05.07.H of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC). The 18 native vegetation retention area may consist of a perimeter berm and be used for 19 water management detention. Any newly constructed berm shall be revegetated 20 to meet subsection 3.05.07.H of the LDC (native vegetation replanting 21 requirements). Additionally, in order to be considered for approval, use of the 22 native vegetation retention area for water management purposes shall meet the 23 following criteria: 24 a. There shall be no adverse impacts to the native vegetation being retained. The 25 additional water directed to this area shall not increase the annual hydro-period 26 unless it is proven that such would have no adverse impact to the existing 27 vegetation. 28 b. If the project requires permitting by the South Florida Water Management 29 District, the project shall provide a letter or official document from the District 30 indicating that the native vegetation within the retention area will not have to 31 be removed to comply with water management requirements. If the District 32 cannot or will not supply such a letter, then the native vegetation retention area 33 shall not be used for water management. 34 c. If the project is reviewed by Collier County, the developer’s engineer shall 35 provide evidence that no removal of native vegetation is necessary to facilitate 36 the necessary storage of water in the water management area. 37 38 7. Southbrooke Office Subdistrict 39 The Southbrooke Office Subdistrict is approximately five (5) acres and is located 40 approximately 1/4 mile east of Oakes Boulevard on the south side of Immokalee Road. he 41 intent of the subdistrict is to permit general office, medical office, and business service uses 42 generally consistent with those uses permissible by right, or as a conditional use in the C-1 43 Commercial Professional and General Office zoning district. 44 9.A.3.i Packet Pg. 544 Attachment: Transmittal_Staff Report_Attchmnt_A (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed GMP Amendments Draft Golden Gate Area Master Plan – BCC Transmittal 07/20/2018 55 | P a g e Words underlined are added, words double underline are added as CCPC recommendations, words struck through are deleted, words double struck through are deleted as CCPC recommendations. 1 Development within the Subdistrict is encouraged to be rezoned as a PUD in order to provide 2 greater specificity of permitted land uses, development standards and any necessary 3 operational characteristics. A maximum of 40,000 square feet of commercial development 4 shall be permitted. All buildings will be limited to single-story and shall be constructed in a 5 common architectural theme. A minimum 30 feet in width vegetated buffer shall be provided 6 adjacent to Autumn Oaks Lane, which shall consist of retained native vegetation. Access to 7 the Subdistrict shall only be from Immokalee Road. 8 9 10 3. AGRICULTURAL/RURAL DESIGNATION 11 A. Rural Settlement Area District 12 This area consists of Sections 13, 14, 23 and 24, and a portion of 22, Township 48 South, Range 13 27 East (the former North Golden Gate Subdivision), which was zoned and platted between 1967 14 and 1970. In settlement of a lawsuit pertaining to the permitted uses of this property, this property 15 has been “vested” for the types of land uses specified in that certain “PUD” by Settlement Zoning 16 granted by the County as referenced in that certain SETTLEMENT AND ZONING AGREEMENT 17 dated the 27th day of January 1986. Twenty-one hundred (2,100) dwelling units and twenty-two 18 (22) acres of neighborhood commercial uses and hotel/motel use are “vested”. This area is now 19 comprised of the Orange Tree PUD and Orange Blossom Ranch PUD, and the types of uses 20 permitted in this District include residential, earth mining, commercial, agricultural, community 21 facility, community uses, education facilities, religious facilities, golf course, open space and 22 recreational uses, and essential service uses. 23 By designation in the Growth Management Plan and the Golden Gate Area Master Plan as 24 Settlement Area, the Plan recognizes the property as an area which, while outside of the Urban 25 Designation, is appropriate for the following types of uses: residential, earth mining, commercial, 26 agricultural, community facility, community uses, education facilities, religious facilities, golf 27 course, open space and recreational, and essential services. 28 Future zoning changes to add dwelling units or commercial acreage within the geographic 29 boundaries of this District will not be prohibited or discouraged by reason of the above-referenced 30 vested status. The geographic expansion of the Settlement Area to additional lands outside the 31 areas covered by Sections 13, 14, 23 and 24, and a portion of 22, Township 48 South, Range 27 32 East (the former North Golden Gate Subdivision), shall be prohibited. The Settlement Area Land 33 Use District is limited to the area described above and shall not be available as a land use district 34 for any other property in the County. 35 4. OVERLAYS AND SPECIAL FEATURES 36 A. Southern Golden Gate Estates Natural Resource Protection Overlay 37 Southern Golden Gate Estates is identified as a Natural Resource Protection Area (NRPA) 38 Overlay on the Golden Gate Area Future Land Use Map and is subject to the NRPA Overlay 39 provisions of the FLUE. 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 9.A.3.i Packet Pg. 545 Attachment: Transmittal_Staff Report_Attchmnt_A (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed GMP Amendments Draft Golden Gate Area Master Plan – BCC Transmittal 07/20/2018 56 | P a g e Words underlined are added, words double underline are added as CCPC recommendations, words struck through are deleted, words double struck through are deleted as CCPC recommendations. FUTURE LAND USE MAP SERIES Golden Gate Area Master Plan Study Areas Golden Gate Area Future Land Use (updated Golden Gate City designations) Golden Gate City Future Land Use High Density Residential Subdistrict 1989 Boundaries of Activity Center Downtown Center Commercial Subdistrict (updated to adjust boundary) Urban Mixed Use Activity Center/Golden Gate Parkway and Coronado Parkway (updated to adjust boundary) Golden Gate Urban Commercial Infill Subdistrict and Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict Santa Barbara Commercial Subdistrict Golden Gate Parkway Professional Office Commercial Subdistrict Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict Pine Ridge Road Interchange Activity Center and Pine Ridge Road Mixed Use Subdistrict Golden Gate Estates Neighborhood Centers Wilson Boulevard/Golden Gate Boulevard Center Collier Boulevard/Pine Ridge Road Center Golden Gate Boulevard/Everglades Boulevard Center Immokalee Road/Everglades Boulevard Center Randall Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict Commercial Western Estates Infill Subdistrict Golden Gate Parkway Interchange Conditional Uses Area Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict Mission Subdistrict Estates Shopping Center Subdistrict Estates Shopping Center Subdistrict Conceptual Plan Everglades – Randall Subdistrict Southbrooke Office Subdistrict Conditional Uses Subdistrict: Golden Gate Parkway Special Provisions Special Exceptions to Conditional Use in Golden Gate Estates Immokalee Road/Randall Boulevard Planning Study Area 9.A.3.i Packet Pg. 546 Attachment: Transmittal_Staff Report_Attchmnt_A (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper Prepared by the Growth Management Department, Community Planning Section Staff December 2017 Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 1 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 547 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy Table of Contents Page Section 1: Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………………1 Section 2: Background………………………………………………………………………………………….4 Section 3: Public Outreach, Data and Analysis………………………………………………………10 Section 4: List of Initial Recommendations……………………………………………………….…73 Appendix A: Public Outreach………………………………………………………………………………78 List of Figures Page Figure 1: Golden Gate Master Plan Update 3 Areas………………………….……………….….2 Figure 2: Golden Gate Area South Blocks……………….………………………………….………….5 Figure 3: Golden Gate Eastern Estates Developed/Vacant Parcels………….……….…….6 Figure 4: Golden Gate Western Estates Developed/Vacant Parcels…………….………...7 Figure 5: Golden Gate City Aerial……………………………………………………………………….….8 Figure 6: Golden Gate City Vacant Parcels………………….……………………………………..….9 Figure 7: Golden Gate City Residential Parcels…….………………………………………………11 Figure 8: Golden Gate City Future Land Use Designations……………………………………12 Figure 9: Proposed Golden Gate City Future Land Use Designations…………………….14 Figure 10: Golden Gate City Redevelopment and Renewal Focus Area………………..15 Figure 11: Golden Gate City Activity Center Aerial……………………………………………….16 Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 2 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 548 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Figure 12: Golden Gate City Planned Transportation Improvements…………………….21 Figure 13: Golden Gate Eastern Estates Distribution of Residential Development…26 Figure 14: Golden Gate Western Estates Distribution of Residential Development..27 Figure 15: Golden Gate Estates Future Land Use Study Area…………………………………28 Figure 16: Golden Gate Eastern Estates Neighborhood Centers…………………………….30 Figure 17: Neighborhood Center at Wilson and Golden Gate Boulevard……….…….31 Figure 18: Immokalee Road and Oakes Boulevard Interface……………………………….32 Figure 19: Area 1 Conditional Uses, Commercial and Potential Areas for Conditional Uses…………………………………………………………………………………………………….33 Figure 20: Area 2 Conditional Uses, Commercial and Potential Areas for Conditional Uses………….…………………………………………………………………………………………34 Figure 21: Area 3 Conditional Uses, Commercial and Potential Areas for Conditional Uses………….…………………………………………………………………………………………35 Figure 22: Long Range Transportation Plan Highway Cost Feasible Plan………………42 Figure 23: Long Range Transportation Plan Needs Assessment…………………………...43 Figure 24: Long Range Transportation Plan New Bridges..……………………………………44 Figure 25: North Golden Gate Estates Flowway Restoration Project……………………52 Figure 26: Belle Meade Area RESTORE Project Area…………………………………………….53 Figure 27: Golden Gate Eastern Estates Non-Conforming Lots…………………………….55 Figure 28: Golden Gate Western Estates Non-Conforming Lots…………….…………….56 List of Tables Table 1: Watershed Management Plan Initiatives……………………………………………….60 Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 3 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 549 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Section 1: Introduction This White Paper provides a conceptual framework to address elements of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) restudy. The GGAMP is a separate element within the County’s Comprehensive Plan. This framework serves as a vehicle to further vet and inform staff, community leaders and the public in advance of the specific language that will be incorporated into the transmittal documents for Growth Management Plan amendment, and the public hearing process. The GGAMP is the second of four restudies focused on eastern Collier County, as directed by the Board of County Commissioners (Board) on February 10, 2015. Focus areas of all four restudies include complementary land uses and economic vitality, including housing affordability, transportation and mobility, and environmental stewardship. As the staggered restudies unfold, relationships and synergies between the study areas are identified and maximized. The Community Planning staff in the Zoning Division of the Growth Management Department provide this document to describe the history and status the GGAMP (Section 2), the planning process, outreach, data and analysis (Section 3) and the list of Initial recommendations (Section 4). Appendix A includes the full documentation of the public outreach process and resu lts. The Golden Gate area includes three diverse geographic areas: the eastern or rural Estates (east of County Road 951), the western or urban Estates (West of County Road 951) and Golden Gate City, an unincorporated area. With these differences in mind, public outreach was designed and pursued along these three geographic lines. However, this report will generally follow a format that separates Golden Gate City from both Estates areas. As understood from public outreach, the eastern and western estates have a great deal in common. Where differences exist, they are described in Section 3. Golden Gate City is fundamentally different than either of the Estates areas. The basic structure of the current GGAMP is divided into two main parts: The Goals, Objectives and Policies (GOPs) section and the Land Use Designation Description section. The former section sets forth vision, values, requirements and aspirations; the latter describes specific subdistricts and their land uses within the GGAMP. Both sections guide the Code of Ordinances and Land Development Code in enactment and updated amendments. As a non-substantive consideration, staff proposes that the GOPs and Land Use Descriptions remain as the organizational framework, but within two parts. One part will be the Golden Gate Estates, the other will be Golden Gate City. In this way, the GOPs pertaining to these very different areas will lend more geographic clarity. Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 4 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 550 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) As with all restudy efforts, the fundamental premise is that any proposal for amendment to the existing Plan must reflect the goals and vision of residents and stakeholders. Residents responded well to outreach efforts and provided a foundation built on community vision and individual preferences. Non-resident stakeholders include interests that extend beyond the boundaries of the Golden Gate. For example, public water utilities in Collier County and City of Naples draw potable water from beneath the Golden Gate Estates area. The issues and potentials involved in water must be considered, along with other shared policy matters. Note on terminology in this White Paper: As shown on Figure 1, the Estates area east of Collier Blvd. (C.R. 951) will be alternatively described as the eastern Estates or the rural Estates; the Estates area west of Collier Blvd. will be alternatively described as the western Estates or the urban Estates. Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 5 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 551 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Throughout this White paper are several figures or maps used for reference. These are also maintained in PDF format on our website, so that the public may view and zoom in, as needed, with greater picture clarity: http://www.colliergov.net/your-government/divisions-s-z/zoning- division/community-planning-section/golden-gate-area-master-plan-restudy/library. Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 6 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 552 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Section 2: Background History of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan The Golden Gate area was first conceived, platted and developed by the Gulf American Land Corp. Development began in the late 1950’s and the subdivision was approved by the Board of County Commissioners in 1960. By 1965, 90% of the land was platted and marketing was well underway. The Estates portion of Golden Gate comprised 163 square miles (111,000 acres), nearly 8% of the County’s total land area, and was believed to be the world’s largest subdivision. It included 813 miles of roadway (mostly lime rock) and 183 miles of canal to drain the area for habitability. Prior to development, the area was regularly inundated by several feet of water during the wet season. The Estates subdivision included mostly 1.25, 2.5 and 5 acre parcels. It was intended to include single family, multi-family and commercial land uses, but was rezoned into low-density single family residential uses in 1974. By 1982, the minimum (legal conforming) lot size for all areas of the Estates became one unit per 2.25 acres. In 1983, the County entered into a settlement agreement with Avatar Corp., the successor to the defunct Gulf American Land Corp. By that time, leaders recognized additional acreage and funds would be needed to provide public services. The agreement included the provision of 1,062 acres under County ownership to be managed for the purposes of recreation, utilities, community services and essential services. The land was also provided as a source of funds to construct the facilities. Prior to 1991, the Golden Gate area was governed by the County’s Future Land Use Element (FLUE), part of the Growth Management Plan (GMP) first adopted in 1989. As mandated by the first GMP, the unique characteristics of the area were recognized in 1991 by the adoption of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP), a separate element in the Collier County Growth Management Plan. Citizens and County leaders recognized the unique quality of the area, and gave special consideration to natural resources, land use, water management and public facilities, as identified by a Citizen’s Steering Committee. In doing so, former Objective 1, Policies 1.1 and 1.3 and Future Land Use Maps for Golden Gate were superseded. Nevertheless, other Goals, Objectives and Policies in the FLUE remain applicable to the Golden Gate area. In 1996, the Board adopted the Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) for Collier County. As a result of that effort, the original Master Plan was replaced by a new G GAMP, pursuant to Ordinance 97- 64. In 2001, the Board directed a restudy of the GGAMP, undertaken by the Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy Committee. The Committee met on more than twenty occasions between June 2001 Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 7 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 553 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) and June 2003 and proposed amendments to the Board for consideration in two phases. The stated goal of this restudy was to guide future decision making in a manner that balances the residents’ need for basic services with natural resource and preservation concerns. Importantly, many of the topics heading todays restudy were closely reviewed by the Committee: commercial uses, conditional uses, rural character and transportation. Subsequently, amendments to the GGAMP were adopted in 2003 and 2004, reflecting community vision for the future of th e area. Since the 1990’s, the State of Florida had been purchasing parcels in the South Golden Gate Estates/NRPA area. Under the Florida Forever and Save our Everglades programs, Picayune Strand State Park was envisioned and pursued, along with significant restoration activity. The acquisition process was completed around 2006. Since then, miles of roadway and canals have been recontoured and three large pump stations and levies installed, with the aim of rehydration to restore natural sheetflow for the benefit of wetlands, aquifers and estuaries, under the direction of South Florida Water Management District and the Army Corps of Engineers. Accordingly, as shown in green on Figure 2, approximately 39,000 acres that comprised the “south blocks” are no longer part of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan. Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 8 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 554 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Current Conditions Following the completion of the purchase and assemblage of Southern Golden Gate Estates by the State of Florida, the remaining area of the rural Golden Gate Estates remains at approximately 58,000 acres. The urban Estates comprise about 8,300 acres and Golden Gate City approximately 2,500 acres. The characteristics of these areas vary greatly. The rural Estates retains the most “rural” character of the three areas, given its size and residential distribution. Because of the development pattern and changes in condition over the past 5 decades, flooding, wildfire and wildlife conditions play a more important role in eastern Estates residents’ lives as compared to the urban area. As of 2016, the rural Estates was nearly 50% built out, as shown in Figure 3, with a higher concentration of dwelling units located nearest the urban area. The population projection for 2016 was Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 9 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 555 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) approximately 32,000 persons. For several decades, this area has been described as a de facto “affordable” housing area, given the land costs in comparison to urban locations. Though its developers built canals to “drain” and lower the water table, remnant wetlands remain on a significant portion of the eastern Estates, including areas within the Horsepen Strand flowway. Meanwhile, the pace of development remains high in the eastern Estates. In fact, building permits issued in this area increased from 273 to 408 year to year, as measured second quarter, 2016 to 2017. In contrast to the rural, eastern Estates, the western Estates is more associated with the urban area, although large lots predominate. This relatively smaller area is in closer proximity to goods, services and job opportunities. Because of its location, it is closer to build-out with 86% of the lots developed, leaving only 14% vacant as of 2016. Figure 4 illustrates the number of residential parcels developed and the number of parcels vacant. Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 10 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 556 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Golden Gate City is at the heart of the GGAMP. As illustrated on Figure 5, the City comprises a denser population in close proximity to a mix of uses which include commercial, office, schools and parks. Although some canals create impediments, and some infrastructure needs improvement, the City is well connected to support a more walkable and bikeable community. Creating a vibrant, walkable community has been identified as a top priority by its residents. The projected 2016 population of Golden Gate City was 24,000. Golden Gate City has a unique demographic; different than what is typically found in urban Collier County. The average age of its residents is 30, compared to 47 county-wide. There are 42% more persons per household (3.38 v. 2.38) and 65% less median household income ($40,000 v. $66,000). Nearly all parcels within Golden Gate City have existing development, however a few parcels remain vacant. Figure 6 shows the current vacant parcels, along with the underlying land use designation. Several vacant parcels exist in both residential and commercial designations. Many of the existing residential and business structures date back to the 1960’s with land values exceeding structure Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 11 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 557 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) values. In addition, some of the larger commercial parcels within the Activity Center are now vacant big-box retailers. These circumstances are a foreshadowing of future redevelopment. Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 12 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 558 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Section 3: Public Outreach, Data and Analysis The Golden Gate area includes three diverse geographic areas: the eastern or rural Estates (east of County Road 951), the western or urban Estates (West of County Road 951) and Golden Gate City, an unincorporated area. With these differences in mind, the restudy effort included public outreach and planning analysis along these three geographic lines. This Section provides information reflective of the unique conditions of Golden Gate City and the Estates. As understood from public outreach, the eastern and western estates have a great deal in common and are discussed in this Section under the same Golden Gate Estates heading. Where differences exist, they are described. The focus areas of complementary land use and economic vitality, transportation and mobility, and environmental stewardship are addressed under both Golden Gate City and Golden Gate Estates. The Golden Gate Area Master Plan restudy public outreach process included extensive public engagement. Residents and stakeholders were encouraged to provide input through multiple platforms including eight public workshops, staff presentations to both the Golden Gate City Civic Association and the Golden Gate Estates Civic Association, a user-friendly website with surveys, and communications through email distribution lists with approximately 330 stakeholders. Appendix A includes the public workshop summaries, polling and survey results, and other communications from stakeholders. The public workshops for both Golden Gate City and the western and eastern Estates kicked-off with a visioning process. The intent was to determine if any of the community values had changed. The visioning process lead to each community developing their own vision statements. These community- defined vision statements should provide guidance for implementing planning goals, objectives and policies. These are provided as a preface to the following Golden Gate City and Golden Gate Estates sections. Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 13 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 559 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Golden Gate City The residents of Golden Gate City created a vision statement during the public workshops. This vision statement reflects the need for the County to adopt land use and transportation policies in the Golden Gate Area Master Plan that are people-oriented and support economic development and redevelopment. Each adopted policy should relate to and further the community’s vision. This vision of a family-oriented community gives direction to consider residents of all ages, children, adults and the elderly, and how they safely move about town, and what destinations are available to help them thrive. Golden Gate City Vision Statement “Golden Gate City is a safe, diverse, family-oriented community that offers easy access to education, parks, shopping and services within a vibrant, walkable community.” Land Use and Economic Vitality Within Golden Gate City there are numerous future land use designations ranging from single family residential use to heavy commercial use. Golden Gate City is a true mixed-use community. Within Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 14 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 560 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Golden Gate City’s four-square-miles, residents are in close proximity to schools, parks, goods and services. The majority of Golden Gate City is designated as residential (approximately 2,255 acres). Commercial areas (291 acres) are distributed throughout the community along the major arterials including Golden Gate Parkway, Santa Barbara Boulevard and Collier Boulevard. To accommodate both residential and commercial uses, the Golden Gate Area Future Land Use Map provides six different commercial designations, each with different allowed uses, intensities and development standards. Figure 7 shows the Golden Gate City areas designated residential in yellow , school sites, and the six designated commercial or mixed-use areas. The majority of Golden Gate City is designated residential as seen on Figure 8. Well established, stable neighborhoods are the building blocks of any community and should be protected and enhanced. According to the most recent Collier County Property Appraise rs information there are approximately 7,887 residential units, which includes 4,213 single family homes and 3,674 multi- family homes. The multi-family homes are condos, apartments, and a good number of duplexes. This Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 15 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 561 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) housing mix supports great diversity in housing choices within Golden Gate City and allows for aging in place within the same community. While the Golden Gate Master Plan offers a full range of commercial uses, many commercial areas remain under-utilized. Some of the largest stores, including K-Mart and Sweet Bay, have recently closed. During the public workshops, the majority of participants felt there isn’t a need for additional commercial areas, but instead want to focus on redevelopment of the existing areas to bring in new businesses, shops, restaurants and services. Along with community public workshops, Collier County Community Planning staff organized a workshop specifically for all property owners within a commercial land use designation. The purpose of the workshop was to identify opportunities and constraints to developing commercial uses. In addition to noting desires to unify and simplify the uses, design standards and processes throughout the commercial designations, there was strong sentiment supporting the evaluation of redevelopment programs and tools for Golden Gate City. To set the stage for redevelopment and creating an authentic s ense of place, it is proposed to simplify the commercial land use designations along Golden Gate Parkway, and provide consistency in the mix of uses and development standards. The following modifications are proposed to the land use designations and Future Land Use Map. 1. Modify the designation of the Golden Gate Parkway Professional Office Commercial Subdistrict (shown on Figure 7 above) to redesignate it and make consistent with the Golden Gate Downtown Center Commercial Subdistrict. This change will simplify the effort to create design themes and development standards to benefit the community’s desire for future redevelopment that is vibrant and walkable. 2. Add two properties along Golden Gate Parkway, not currently included in this designation. One property is at the northeast corner of Golden Gate Parkway and Santa Barbara, where a CVS store is currently located. The second property is the Coral Palm Apartments located between the Activity Center and the Downtown District . Including this property meets the intent of creating a mixed-use corridor. The addition of these two properties is forward looking to provide for greater development consistency along Golden Gate Parkway in the event of future redevelopment. 3. The final proposed change is to include the Wheels BMX skate park and band shell within the boundary of the Activity Center. The Activity Center provides many civic uses and including this park is consistent with the mixed-use intent of the Activity Center. This will provide Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 16 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 562 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) greater certainty that the park is well connected into the Activity Center and a focal point for community celebrations. There are two policies in the current GGAMP that call for community-planning and neighborhood- based planning programs, however, these policies have not been implemented. During the public workshops, residents expressed a clear willingness to participate in the planning process for their community. When asked, “would you be willing to participate in community -based planning program?”, the majority of workshop participants were willing to engage in such a program. Continued community participation will be needed for future planning efforts such as redevelopment, urban design themes, development standards, and the creation of branding and marketing materials. To best facilitate community and neighborhood-based planning programs Collier County staff should engaged with and support the established Golden Gate City Civic Association and the Municipal Services Taxing District (MSTU), utilizing these established groups to involve residents in future planning efforts. Working with these associations builds cohesion, recognition and support for Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 17 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 563 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) community leadership to continue their focus for improvements in Golden Gate City. It is proposed to work within the established Civic Association and the MSTU, their leadership, administration and outreach platforms, rather than creating a new community planning group administered by Collier County staff as currently called for in the Master Plan. Supporting Golden Gate City Redevelopment Golden Gate City contains several commercial areas that are centrally located to the population. The available acreage for commercial development is sufficient to support the residents of Golden Gate City and the surrounding area; therefore, there is not a need to designate additional areas. Instead, focus is needed within the current commercial areas. These areas are dated, auto-oriented and have some significant “dark boxes” resulting from big box store closures. For the community vision to be realized, redevelopment that is people-oriented is needed. The proposed areas to emphasize renewal efforts are the Activity Center and along Golden Gate Parkway (Figure 10). Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 18 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 564 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) There are three distinct areas within the Activity Center; one is the civic area where the community center, library and other civic uses are located, the second area is where the Winn-Dixie is located, and the third area is where the vacant K-Mart building is located. Both the Winn-Dixie plaza and the vacant K-Mart plaza each have a single owner, making these large aggregated parcels more viable for redevelopment (Figure 11). As developed, these three areas within the Activity Center do not interconnect or relate to one another. They were clearly developed separately without a vision or consideration for the whole. This is a shortcoming of the full potential of this Activity Center. Moreover, the Activity Center plazas were developed in an auto-oriented pattern with access and circulation favoring the automobile. This form of urban development, also found along Golden Gate Parkway, creates impediments to the community’s desire to be a safe, walkable, vibrant community. The typical auto-oriented pattern creates an “anywhere USA” and lacks authentic community identity. Opportunity Naples (2014) has been a guidepost for Collier County economic development. Opportunity Naples found a need for shovel ready sites for target industries in Collier County. The report also found “growth trends in Collier County’s age dynamics risk the future sustainability of the local workforce. Collier County’s 25 to 44-year-old population is proportionally smaller than every comparison area except Sarasota County, as is Collier’s percentage of 0 to 19-year-old residents. Without an influx of younger workers migrating to the County or a spike in birth rates, Greater Naples could face a significant shortfall of replacement workers for future retirees. Likewise, there will be an occupational shortage in Collier County if qualified workers aged 24 to 44 are not recruited to the area to replace retirees.” This age group, and most specifically the millennials, is one of the most sought-after market segments. Fortunately for Golden Gate City the median age is 30, falling right into that desirable workforce age range. Study after study shows millennials are increasingly choosing vibrant , healthy, walkable communities and rejecting the automobile-centric land use patterns of the generations before them. Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 19 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 565 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Golden Gate City has the basis to be just the type of place the young workforce and their employers are searching for. Further supporting mixed-use, allowing employment centers, and improving the walking infrastructure can become an economic development strategy—a tool to retain and attract a skilled workforce and to build a sustainable economic base. To increase job opportunities within Golden Gate City, and provide nearly shovel ready sites, it is proposed to add several specific land uses to the Activity Center designation. These uses support target industries such as, advanced manufacturing, software development, and data and information processing. To ensure a process to determine compatibility with the surrounding area, these new uses within the Activity Center are proposed as conditional uses, hence nearly shovel ready. Alternatively, the Board could allow these as permitted uses and promoted development standards within the Land Development Code to address compatibility. There are several redevelopment programs that could assist in furthering economic development within Golden Gate City. Collier County uses two of these tools. First , the Community Redevelopment Area (CRA). Collier County currently has two CRAs, one in Immokalee and one in the Bayshore Triangle area. The establishment of a CRA is a very lengthy and bureaucratic process. At the state legislative level, CRAs have recently come under scrutiny with some legislators supporting their disbandment. The advantage of the CRA is the County’s administration, engagement and oversight of the redevelopment area projects, along with Tax Increment Financing (TIF). However, Golden Gate City’s demographic and economic profile is similar to that of Immokalee and Bayshore and while a CRA may benefit Golden Gate City, it is likely to compete for grants with the other two CRAs therefore inhibiting the potential of the all CRAs. The second tool the County uses is the Innovation Zone. Ave Maria town centers are designated Innovation Zones. The Innovation Zone, created by BCC Ordinance 2010-20, is a local TIF tool to promote economic growth and diversity. Innovation Zones may be designated by the BCC through the implementation of Economic Development Plans adopted by resolution for each Innovation Zone. Per the Ordinance, “the use of available TIF revenues within an Innovation Zone as a dedicated economic development tool and funding source enhance the general welfare of the County through the advancement of new employment opportunities, the implementation of redevelopment initiatives, the creation of new economic development opportunities and locations and the expansion of existing employment centers.” By permitting specific light industrial uses and employment centers for target industries within the Golden Gate City Activity Center, there is a clear intent to promote economic growth in Golden Gate City, thereby making the Innovation Zone an applicable and viable tool for redevelopment. As a local tool, the BCC is able to designate Innovation Zones without State oversight. Measuring the pros and cons of each redevelopment tool, it is proposed for the Board to designate an Innovation Zone which Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 20 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 566 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) encompasses the Activity Center and Golden Gate Parkway to promote economic growth and redevelopment. In the Santa Barbara Commercial Subdistrict there is a provision for a minimum project size of one acre. Most parcels are half or a quarter of this size making it less feasible for the property owners to develop or redevelop their properties under this requirement. It is proposed to remove this limitation in effort to support the property owners desire to develop their property consistent with the uses allowed. The Land Development Code may be revised as necessary to address any development standards needed to support this change. The Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict, located along the western side of Collier Boulevard between Golden Gate Parkway and Green Boulevard allows heavy commercial with some properties presently zoned C-5, the most intense commercial district. Sustainable communities need appropriate locations for heavy commercial zoning. This land use designation is well located and there are no changes proposed. However, it should be noted that some homeowners located within the western portion of this Subdistrict were very surprised to learn their home had a heavy commercial land use designation. The previous restudy expanded this subdistrict boundary back into a single-family neighborhood. Careful consideration should be given within the Land Development Code to ensure design standards are in place so homeowners are not negatively impacted. Growth Management Plan Policies The following goals, objectives, policies and land use designations outline the land use provisions currently adopted. The policies are relatively non-descript and do not necessarily form a clear the direction for Golden Gate City. This outline is followed by policy recommendations proposed to identify and further the community’s vision. Related Existing Provisions in the GGAMP Goal 4: To preserve and enhance a mix of residential and commercial land uses within Golden Gate City that provides for the basic needs of both the local residents and the residents of the surrounding area. Objective 4.1: Provide for residential and commercial land uses that meet the needs of the surrounding area in the development and redevelopment within Golden Gate City. Policy 4.0.1: Development and redevelopment with Golden Gate City shall be guided by the residential and commercial needs of the surrounding area. Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 21 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 567 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Policy 4.1.1 Collier County shall develop an implementation schedule for the creation of a community-planning program for Golden Gate City… Policy 4.1.2 Collier County shall begin to examine, by holding community meetings, the feasibility of establishing neighborhood-based planning programs within Golden Gate City that focus on the unique or distinct features of the different portions of the community. While focusing on distinct areas within the community, such neighborhood planning efforts as may be established shall not neglect Golden Gate City as a whole. Policy 4.1.3: Collier County shall examine the feasibility of crafting land development regulations specific to the Golden Gate City community. Such regulations shall focus on the unique circumstances of this community. Existing Non-residential Land Use Designations (synopsis) High Density Residential Subdistrict To encourage higher density residential and promote mixed -uses in close proximity to Activity Centers, those residential zoned properties permitting up to 12 dwelling units per acre. Downtown Center Commercial Subdistrict: The primary purpose of the Downtown Center Commercial Subdistrict is to encourage redevelopment along Golden Gate Parkway in order to improve the physical appearance of the area and create a viable downtown district for the residents of Golden Gate City and Golden Gate Estates. Mixed-use Activity Center Subdistrict The Activity Center designated of the Future Land Use Map is intended to accommodate commercial zoning within the Urban Designated Area. Activity Centers are intended to be mixed-use in character. Golden Gate Urban Commercial In-fill Subdistrict This Subdistrict is located at the southwest quadrant of C.R. 951 and Golden Gate Parkway. Commercial uses are limited to low intensity and intermediate commercial uses similar to C-1, C-2, or C-3 zoning. Santa Barbara Commercial Subdistrict The intent of the Santa Barbara Commercial Subdistrict is to provide Golden Gate City with an area that is primarily commercial, with an allowance for certain conditional uses. Thy types of uses permitted within this Subdistrict are low intensity retail, offices, personal services and institutional. Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 22 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 568 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) The provisions of this Subdistrict are intended to provide Golden Gate City with a viable professional office district with associated small-scale retail. Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict The primary purpose of the Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict is to encourage redevelopment along Collier Boulevard in order to improve the physical appearance of th e area. This Subdistrict is intended to allow a mix of uses, including heavy commercial within those areas presently zoned C- 5. Recommended Policies • Establish land use designations to protect established, stable, neighborhoods and provide opportunity for redevelopment and renewal through development practices that promote compatibility. • Support redevelopment of Golden Gate Parkway to provide for a viable pedestrian environment adding to the vibrancy and walkability of Golden Gate City. • Add land uses within the designated Activity Center intended to promote job growth and strengthen the economic health of Golden Gate City. • Protect the land uses allowing for diversity of residential housing. • Engage with the Golden Gate Civic Association and MSTU to further community planning programs. • Consider redevelopment tools such as an Innovation Zone to further economic development and redevelopment strategies. • Develop amendments to the Land Development Code to support and implement redevelopment initiatives including incentives for building remodeling and renovation. • Develop a branding and marketing plan for Golden Gate City. • Ensure pertinent incentive programs are made available to those seeking business creation and redevelopment opportunities in Golden Gate City. • Modify the land use designations along Golden Gate Parkway to create a consistent development pattern. • Add target industry uses to the Activity Center. • In the Santa Barbara Commercial District, remove the minimum project size of one acre. Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 23 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 569 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Transportation and Mobility Golden Gate City has a well-connected neighborhood roadway network. However, nearly all streets lack sidewalks or other infrastructure to support walking. This severely limits safe transportation for Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 24 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 570 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) children and those that don’t drive. During the public workshops, there were few complaints of traffic congestion, apart from a few residents’ concern about peak-hour traffic on Santa Barbara Boulevard at the Green Boulevard intersection. The primary transportation focus of residents is improving walking, bicycling and transit access. This is reflected in the Golden Gate City vision statement. It was reported during the public workshops that many Golden Gate City residents are bicycling to work in the coastal area. Recognizing Golden Gate City is a family oriented community, many of the citizens are not of driving age; rather, they are children and seniors that are no longer driving trying to get to services, schools, parks and friends homes. The 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan Needs Assessment shows a needed demand to improve Santa Barbara Boulevard north of Golden Gate Parkway, and that is the only roadway improvement shown as “needed.” The critical need for transportation improvements in Golden Gate City are those that s upport walking, bicycling and transit. Figure 12 shows the existing sidewalk systems is limited to those areas surrounding schools. A few planned sidewalk construction projects are mainly along arterial roads. Very few streets have bike lanes. The Collier MPO has identified the transit need in Golden Gate City by including a future transit transfer point, indicated with a blue circle in the center of Golden Gate City. Additionally, recognizing the transportation needs of pedestrians, the Collier MPO recently initiated the Golden Gate City Walkable Community Study. This study will assess and prioritize pedestrian facility needs for Golden Gate City based on quantitative and qualitative factors. This study will provide guidance to improving the waling conditions in Golden Gate City. Further, it will help the Golden Gate City achieve their vision of a safe, family-oriented community. Following completion of the study and acceptance by the Collier MPO, the approved study recommendations should be incorporated into the Golden Gate Area Master Plan. Growth Management Plan Policies The following goals, objectives, policies outline the related transportation provisions currently adopted. This outline is followed by policy recommendations proposed to identify and further the community’s vision. Related Existing Provisions in the GGAMP Policy 6.2.3: Sidewalks and bike lanes shall provide access to government facilities, schools, commercial areas and the planned County greenway network. Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 25 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 571 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Objective 6.3: Coordinate with local emergency services officials in planning and constructing road improvements within Golden Gate Estates and Golden Gate City to ensure that the access needs of fire department, police and emergency management personnel and vehicles are met. Objective 7.3 Develop strategies through the County Growth Management Division – Planning and Regulation for the enhancement of roadway interconnection within Golden Gate City and the Estates Area including interim measures to assure interconnection. Recommended Policies • Support all transportation needs within Golden Gate City with an emphasis on walkability. Walkability will be improved through the implementation of the recommendations of the MPO’s Walkability Study. • Within the Activity Center, maintain multiple connections to the surrounding neighborhoods and through the Activity Center while providing safe and direct access to transit stops within or adjacent to the Activity Center. • Consider protecting alleys from vacating process where there is reasonable connection and continuity for future pathway corridors. • Initiate periodic speed studies in Golden Gate City and when appropriate, utilize traffic calming measures and speed limit reductions to ensure a safe pedestrian environment. Environmental Stewardship The primary concern for potential environmental degradation in Golden Gate City is associated with the many private wells and septic tanks. As reported by Collier County Utilities Department, residences so near one another pose a significant risk of contamination to individual water wells or supply-sources for the entire region. Private water wells and septic tanks age over time, have a limited lifecycle, and have a wide disparity in the level of maintenance by various property owners, affecting the life and functionality of the tanks. Currently, only one complete quadrant of four within Golden Gate City has access to a treated potable water supply from a private utility, Florida Governmental Utility Authority (FGUA). At their June 27, 2017 meeting, the Board of County Commissioners provided direction to County staff to initiate a due diligence process and negotiate terms of acquisition of FGUA. Integrating the Golden Gate City system into the Collier County Public Utilities system and expanding utility services to homes and businesses within Golden Gate City provides a long-term strategy to address potential environmental impacts and system reliability. Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 26 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 572 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Growth Management Plan Policies While Golden Gate City doesn’t encompass significant natural resources, it is important to focus on policies related to utilities for the reasons stated above. The adopted policies are related to the Florida Governmental Utilities Authority. The proposed provisions reflect the County’s initiative to assume responsibility of maintenance and expansion of utilities for Golden Gate City. Related Existing Provisions in the GGAMP Objective 1.2: Ensure public facilities are provided at an acceptable level of service. Policy 1.2.3: Consistent with Chapter 89-169, Florida Administrative Code, the Florida Governmental Utilities Authority, or its successor, shall provide updated water and sewer service data to the Collier County Water and Wastewater Authority on an annual basis. Policy 1.2.4: Due to the continued use of individual septic systems and private wells within a densely platted urban area, the Florida Governmental Utilities Authority, or its successor, is encouraged to expand their sewer and water service area to include all of that area known as Golden Gate City at the earliest possible time. Recommended Policy • Maintain and expand sewer and water service in accordance with the Collier County Water and Sewer District Implementation Plan. Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 27 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 573 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Golden Gate Estates Golden Gate Eastern Estate Vision Statement “The Golden Gate Eastern Estates is an interconnected, low-density residential community with limited goods and services in neighborhood centers, defined by a rural character with an appreciation for nature and quiet surroundings.” Golden Gate Western Estate Vision Statement “Golden Gate Western Estates is a low-density, large-lot residential neighborhood in a natural setting with convenient access to the coastal area.” Land Use and Economic Vitality Within the GGAMP, there are Goals, Objectives and Policies (GOPs) as well as a Land Use Description Section that pertain specifically to Estates land uses. This section describes the status, review and community recommendations pertaining to GOPs and Estates land use descriptions, both east (rural) and west (urban) of CR 951. Generally, the land uses can be divided into these categories: Residential, Commercial and Conditional. Additionally, policies related to public facilities, adjacent land uses and notice provisions are considered. Residential Land Uses Golden Gate Estates is an area primarily intended for residential uses. Of the 66,000 acres that make up today’s Golden Gate Estates, over 95% is reserved for residential use under the current plan. This is consistent with Goal 5 of the GGAMP that balances the preservation of rural character, wooded lots, the keeping of livestock, the ability to grow crops. wildlife activity and low density residential with limited commercial and conditional uses. As of 2016, the rural Estates residential lots total almost 24,000 in number. Approximately half have been developed. Absent future changes in conservation of parcels for environmental or recreational purposes, the current population of 31,100 can be expected to double by build-out. Figure 13 shows the existing distribution of developed residential areas with in the rural Estates. Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 28 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 574 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) By contrast, Figure 14 shows the development of urban Estates lots is much closer to build-out. In this area, 86% of the parcels have been developed, leaving only 430 vacant parcels in this much smaller portion of Golden Gate Estates. An analysis of building activity in Golden Gate Estates suggests that development is currently accelerating. When comparing annual totals as of second quarter, 2017 to second quarter, 2016, permit applications rose from 273 to 408, an increase of almost 50%. Taken together, 681 housing starts over this 2- year period suggests economic vigor in a post- high foreclosure market. Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 29 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 575 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) During public outreach, residents and stakeholders did not advocate any major changes in residential land use. Most individuals polled preferred to maintain a low density residential environment with few changes. In fact, the Golden Gate Estates Area Civic Association (GGEACA) voiced the preference for a “low density overlay” to protect its character well into the future. The minimum lot size would remain unchanged, with the possibility of recombining some legal non-conforming (smaller) lots. No new designations of residential areas to Neighborhood Centers were suggested. The sole conversion of residential areas endorsed by the public was for office type commercial along a short length of Immokalee Road in the Urban Estates and the possibility of non-residential land uses near the Randal Rd. curve on Immokalee Rd. Residents were polled about some specific aspects of Residential land use. Polling questions included allowing group homes as a permitted use and changing the rules surrounding home-based businesses. Public sentiment was against any change in either topic area. When asked about the desirability of allowing rental of guest houses, polls found mixed results. At a public workshop held in November 2016, 56% of respondents were in favor. In contrast, only 26% responded favorably at a February 2017 public workshop. Currently, there are approximately 700 guest homes in the Estates area. Based on the strong environmental preferences in response to other issues, staff does not recommend guest house rentals, as it would tend to weaken the desire to retain a lower density, lower impact community. Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 30 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 576 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Some requested changes, as described in the environmental portion below, relate the desire to recombine legal non-conforming lots and to require or incentivize on-site stormwater retention and other water-related initiatives to maximize water quality, percolation and floodplain protection. Also, noted in the environmental section, are recommendations for strengthening wildfire prevention and lighting standards. These provisions cross several land uses, including residential land use. Public Notice Although the concept of strengthening various notice provisions was not queried or mentioned in public outreach workshops, staff has observed one notice issue in the context of public petitions. Currently, mailed notices are required in advance of Neighborhood Information Meetings (NIMs) as well as certain public hearings. Where required, it would be beneficial for all involved to provide notices along the entire length of dead-end Estates avenues or streets where a project makes direct impact, if the length is greater than the required linear distance of 1,000 feet. (See Non-Residential Uses/Notice provisions, below.) Specific Property Re-designations From time to time staff was queried about specific properties and whether there would be any specific land use changes recommended. Staff understood its Restudy scope as one essentially limited to universal principles- either in land use or other GOPs. However, it is always possible that, during the Public Hearing process, public officials will endorse land use changes in a parcel specific manner. For example, parcels owned by the County may be the subject of Board direction at Transmittal to effect affordable or senior housing needs, or to accommodate other public uses such as park and ride locations, or other land uses. One specific location that gained attention following public outreach is the area in the vicinity of the Immokalee Rd. curve near Randall Blvd. This is a location where significant transportation planning is underway, and the Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 31 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 577 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) area may be suitable for non-residential uses such as an activity center or other designation. The recommendations below include this area as a future study area to det ermine appropriateness of re-designation, following the completion of the Randall Blvd. and Oil Well Road Corridor Study. The depiction of the future study area, below, extends from 33d Ave NE to properties west of Wilson Blvd., and may be adjusted before the study begins. Staff recommends that the study commence upon the completion of the Oil Well Rd. and Randall Blvd. transportation study. Growth Management Plan Policies Related Existing Provisions in GGAMP: Designation Description/Residential Estates Subdistrict: Single family residential development is allowed within this Subdistrict at a maximum density of one unit per 2.25 gross acres, or one unit per legal non-conforming lot of record, exclusive of guest houses. Objective 5.3: Provide for the protection of the rural character of Golden Gate Estates. Policy 5.3.0.1: Rural character protection provisions shall provide for the preservation of such rural amenities as, but not limited to, wooded lots, the keeping of livestock, the ability to grow crops, wildlife activity, and low-density residential development. Policy 5.3.2: The Land Development Code shall continue to allow and further encourage the preservation of native vegetation and wildlife indigenous to the Estates area. Objective 1.4: Provide a living environment within the Golden Gate area, which is aesthetically acceptable and protects the quality of life. Policy 1.4.0.1 Collier County shall provide a living environment that is aesthetically acceptable and protects the quality of life through the enforcement of applicable codes and laws. Policy 1.4.1: The County’s Code Enforcement Board shall strictly enforce the Land Development Code and other applicable codes and laws to control the illegal storage of machinery, vehicles and junk, and the illegal operation of commercial activities within the Golden Gate area. Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 32 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 578 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Recommended Policies • See Non-residential Land Uses and Environmental Recommendations. Neighborhood Centers and Non-residential Uses Presently, there are three (3) Neighborhood Center designations in the Rural Estates and one (1) on the eastern edge of the urban Estates. In addition to Neighborhood Centers, there are four (4) mixed-use or commercial Sub-districts in the rural Estates and six (6) within the urban Estates. The locations can be seen below in Figure 16. During the public outreach meetings in the rural Estates and in the urban Estates, no new Neighborhood Centers were suggested or desired. Rather, there was strong sentiment to increase the availability of commercial uses in adjoining RFMUD and RLSA areas. In this way, the predominant Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 33 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 579 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) rural, residential character of the Estates could be maintained. Importantly, by placing office, commercial, business and industrial parks in these adjoining Districts, shopp ing, employment and entertainment opportunities would emerge in closer proximity to the Estates, and within easier drive times. As noted in the Master Mobility Plan (2012), reverse trips and shorter trips (fewer vehicle miles travelled) yield benefits to infrastructure demand, local economy, quality of life, environmental protection and public safety. Resizing the Neighborhood Centers Although no new Neighborhood Centers were desired by the public, there was a clear desire by those within the rural Estates that the three Neighborhood Centers should be “right-sized”, to function appropriately within a rural context. For example, Figure 17 shows the three quadrants within the Wilson Boulevard and Golden Gate Boulevard Center contains development areas of 8.45, 7.15 and 4.86 acres, as seen in the figure below. As stated by the Golden Gate Estates Area Civic Association (GGEACA), these Centers should be allowed “sufficient (increased) area for road development, septic/wastewater treatment, and water retention.” Additional rationale would include parking, future right- of-way expansion and effective buffering from residential uses. The GGEACA recommended an 80-acre maximum node for each of the three rural Neighborhood Centers. This equates to a maximum of 20 acres per quadrant- an important measure because at least 2 of the 3 rural Neighborhood Centers will not develop all 4 quadrants. In most instances 20 acres will not be required to build an efficient development area, but can serve as a maximum under the Master Plan. Upsizing of any Neighborhood Center would require a rezoning of the property. The maximum acreage per quadrant is not an entitlement but allows the applicant to request zoning greater than the current Future Land Use Map would indicate, under criteria, without a requirement to amend the GGAMP. In all, there are 10 commercial or mixed-use subdistricts in Golden Gate Estates. For the most part, these subdistricts emerged over the past 20 years through private plan amendment applications and Board approvals. As noted, the scope of this Restudy does not include additional site-specific Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 34 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 580 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) recommendations. Further, stakeholders do not presently support additional site -specific commercial designations. Immokalee Rd./Oaks Blvd. Interface There is one location within the urban Estates best described as a potential corridor re-designation. This is an area along the Immokalee Road/Oaks Estates interface as shown in Figure 18. Currently zoned uses among the 16 parcels located in this corridor include 2 com mercial uses (C-1), 8 conditional uses and 6 residential uses. One of the residential uses is entitled to a transitional conditional use application. Another is a County-owned parcel for water retention. Thus, five parcels could retain existing residential zoning or apply for a CU or rezone to C-1, under the recommendation below. When asked about additional conditional uses in the western Estates, a slight majority felt that additional locations were not needed. However, when asked whether the Immokalee Road/Oaks interface should have future land uses to include office and conditional uses, over 75% were in favor. The public understood that a more unified planning approach to this corridor could result in better outcomes, including access points and continu ity. For this reason, the recommendation below suggests a FLUE designation that allows rezone applications for C-1 uses as well as conditional uses in this corridor. Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 35 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 581 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Conditional Uses Conditional use opportunities in Golden Gate Estates include churches, social and fraternal organizations, child care and adult day care centers, private schools, group care facilities (such as nursing homes and assisted living facilities) and model homes. As conditional uses, they are generally appropriate if compatible with neighboring uses, and should be limited as to location and number. A GGAMP allowance for conditional use provides a right to seek approval, not a right for the use at any location. Typically, if granted, conditional uses are subject to numerous conditions of development and operation. The GGAMP allows conditional use applications for properties designated as residential. However, the locational criteria are extremely limited, except for essential services. The Neighborhood Center Transitional Conditional Use provisions allow such applications if immediately adjacent to a designated Neighborhood Center (there are 4 in total). The Transitional Conditional Use provisions allow applications for conditional uses if adjacent to some, but not all non -residential uses. In addition, there are further restrictions along Golden Gate Parkway from Livingston to Santa Barbara Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 36 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 582 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) and on the west side of Collier Blvd. The limited availability for conditional use applications can be gleaned from the analytic Figures 19, 20 and 21. The areas marked in yellow indicate conditional use potential under the current GGAMP. Because Golden Gate Estates is 50% built out, it is likely that additional locations would be useful for conditional uses as development progresses. With this in mind, staff sought public feedback on the possibility of expanding location potentials. Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 37 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 583 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Arterial Intersections Surveys in the rural Estates indicated a preference to allow some additional potential CU locations if limited as to location and type. A majority stated that additional CUs should be allowed at more locations, and specifically allowed at arterial intersections (described as 4 or more lane roads intersected by 4 or more lane roads). Slightly less than half of those surveyed in the urban Estates thought that CUs should be considered at major intersections (45% v. 50%). While suitability of land use underlies this recommendation, we note that there is a possibility that the conversion of use from residential to conditional use could potentially increase future ROW acquisition costs for future road expansion. A compilation of the intersections that would qualify as include: Rural Estates • Everglades Blvd. and Oil Well Rd. • Golden Gate Blvd. and Collier Blvd. (east quadrants) • Vanderbilt Beach Rd. and Wilson Blvd. (future) Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 38 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 584 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) • Everglades Blvd. and Randall Rd. (future) • Wilson Blvd. and Immokalee Rd. (future, south quadrants) Urban Estates • Logan Blvd. and Pine Ridge Rd. • Golden Gate Pkwy. and Santa Barbara Blvd. (west quadrants) • Logan Blvd. and Vanderbilt Beach Rd. (future, SW quadrant only) (Note: “future” designation derived from 2040 LRTP) Based on this recommendation, a total of 6 quadrants in the rural Estates could qualify for CU application, not considering current land uses at those locations. An additional 10 quadrants could support conditional use applications in the rural Estates, based on improvements indicated in the MPO’s LRTP. In the urban Estates, a total of 6 quadrants could qualify for CU application not considering current uses. An additional quadrant could qualify based on the MPO’s LRTP. Public opinion differed when individuals spoke about church uses. Opinions ranged from allowing churches along major road corridors to eliminating any additional locations for churches. Staff’s recommendation, below, is the addition of the major arterial intersections (as defined) as a locational criterion for CU applications; plan language would allow parcel assemblage where minimum ingress/egress requirements dictate. The CU applicant should demonstrate the need for the requested acreage in the context of the intended use and facilities and ingress/egress recommendations. Golden Gate Parkway and Collier Blvd. Special Provisions As noted in the Related Existing Provisions section, below, there are special provisions related to Golden Gate Parkway and Collier Blvd. frontages. As described above, the only change to the Golden Gate Parkway provisions would be a change allowing CU applications for properties located at the corner of Golden Gate Parkway and Santa Barbara Blvd. The two quadrants at that location are currently zoned PUD or CU. With respect to the Collier Blvd. Special provisions, the GGAMP currently requires adjoining conditional uses on two sides, rather than the transitional conditional use provision requiring certain non-residential uses on one side only. Staff observes that, during a public hearing for a zoning change request at 13th Ave SW and Collier Blvd, a conditional use was not available under the GMP due to this provision. However, the property in question was located next to an industrial type (PUD) use, Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 39 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 585 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) which could make a CU a suitable transition to adjoining residential. For this reason, the recommendation below would remove the Collier Blvd. Special Provision. We also note that this specific recommendation was not vetted during public outreach workshops. Accordingly, this fact should be noted during the Transmittal process. Communication Towers Communication towers are listed conditional uses in Golden Gate Estates. As such, they are limited to the locational criteria found in the Designation Description section. The available locations for cell towers are extremely limited, as these are not “essential services” as defined in the Land Development Code. As technologies quickly advance, the applications for communication transmission devices may look considerable different in just a few years than they do today. Individual consideration of proposed installations should be reviewed in each instance. A solid majority of residents surveyed, both in the rural Estates and the urban Estates, indicated dissatisfaction with existing cell service. Over 75% of the rural estates resident s surveyed believed that communication towers should be conditional uses, available at any location in the Estates. The recommendation below retains this land use as a conditional use, requiring application, notice and public hearing, but available for application at any location in the Estates (at least 2.25 acres in size). Conditional Use Acreage At present, conditional uses are generally limited to 5 acres. Although not specifically queried in public outreach, staff sees the 5-acre limitation as creating problems similar to the acreage limitations within currently approved Neighborhood Centers. Th e issues noted there are adequacy of stormwater retention, buffering, parking, roadway needs and septic provisions. In some cases, the current 5-acre standard may prove sufficient. However, applicants may wish to request a greater acreage. This request would remain subject to the public hearing requirements of the Conditional Use, but the provision for greater acreage in the GGAMP would relieve the applicants from amending the GMP to creating otherwise unnecessary sub-districts. Rather than suggesting 20 acres as recommended by the GGEACA for Neighborhood Centers, a more modest 10 -acre maximum is recommended. If embraced, staff also supports enhanced buffering requirements similar to those required for the Neighborhood Centers. Public Facilities In addition to the growing transportation network in and near the Estates, numerous public facilities serve Estates residents. The eastern Estates is served by: two high schools, several elementary and Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 40 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 586 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) middle schools; three fire stations; 2 EMS stations; Sheriffs stations; a library; community parks and a regional park under design. Additional public facilities are planned to accommodate the growth in population, as monitored by the County’s Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR) and coordinated through the Growth Management Department and associated County departments, including the Collier County School District and independent agencies. With regard to public facilities as a land use, members of the public stressed compatibility within a predominantly residential area. Specifically, there is interest in developing rural architectural standards for public buildings as well as other non -residential structures. A unified architectural standard can provide a greater sense of identity to the Estates District. In addit ion, there is interest in updating development standards such as setbacks and buffers, particularly as public uses intensify at existing or future locations. Firebreak Staging and Park and Ride Park and ride facilities are essentially parking areas that can serve several purposes. As many rural estates residents commute to the urban area for daily work, or for occasional shopping and entertainment, a park and ride area can support voluntary ride sharing to and from proximate urban locations. Ride sharing applications for mobile devices have emerged as a helpful tool for commuters. At an appropriate time, bus/transit service could also serve these locations. The importance of park and ride and ride sharing for community-wide benefits was underscored by the Master Mobility Plan (accepted by Board, 2012) and by ULI in their review of housing affordability (2017). Additionally, as part of the initiative to support natural disaster prevention and response programs, portions of these facilities could be used for staging equipment, vehicles and operations. Nearly 40% of the citizens polled reported that they would consider using such facilities. It is suggested that the County consider appropriate locations for these facilities, with locational criteria including direct access to arterial roadways and buffering, and apply for Board approval through the Conditional Use public hearing process. Adjacent Future Land Use Districts The eastern Estates is bounded by The Rural Fringe Mixed Use District (RFMUD) on 2 sides and the Rural Lands Stewardship Area (RLSA) on another. There are two essential parameters of interest to eastern estates residents. Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 41 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 587 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) First, residents are very enthusiastic about the possibility of more robust economic development in the RFMUD and RLSA. Residents desire more proximate commercial areas for shopping and services, and want employment opportunities. For these reasons, residents were highly supportive of RFMUD Village centers, RLSA towns, and freestanding business and industrial park locations in these Districts. The potential for eastern Estates residents to shop and work within shorter distances and outside of the urban area is a great benefit to them, and this advantage redounds to County taxpayers through reduced miles travelled, lower capital and maintenance costs for roads, and a reduced carbon footprint. Second, eastern Estates residents desire compatibility of uses where adjoining Districts develop adjacent to the Estates. Enhanced buffers and setbacks are suggested at the interface of t hese Districts. These development standards will be specified by LDC review and amendment, and reflected in the Policies of the GGAMP. Notice Provisions Although not discussed in the Restudy outreach workshops, staff has observed past private petitions that involved Estates re-designation and rezoning. In the Estates, written notice provisions related to Neighborhood Information Meetings (NIMs) and public hearings extend 1,000 feet from the property lines of the project (compared to 500 feet in the urban area). In reality, affected Estates residential uses may extend the length of a dead-end street. A typical dead-end street in the Estates is approximately one mile. Accordingly, many affected residents are not provided with written notice. The recommendation associated with this topic would require written notice beyond 1,000 feet, where traffic impacts can be reasonably anticipated, as a result of the land use change, on a dead - end street or avenue in the Estates. In such a case, notice should be provided along the entire length of the affected street or avenue. Growth Management Plan Policies Related Existing Provisions in the GGAMP: Objective 5.3: Provide for the protection of the rural character of Golden Gate Estates. Objective 1.2 Ensure public facilities are provided at an acceptable level of service Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 42 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 588 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Goal 3: To provide for basic commercial services for purposes of serving the rural needs of Golden Gate Estates residents, shortening vehicular trips, and preserving rural character. Existing Land Use Designations (synopsis) Neighborhood Center Subdistrict: Recognizing the need to provide basic goods, services and amenities to Estates residents, Neighborhood centers have been designated on the Golden Gate Area Future land use map. T he Neighborhood Center designation does not guarantee that commercial zoning will be granted. The designation only provides the opportunity to request commercial zoning. Conditional Uses Subdistrict: Various types of conditional uses are permitted in the estates zoning district within the Golden Gate estates area. In order to control the location and spacing of new conditional uses, one of the following four sets of criteria shall be met: a) Essential Services Conditional Use Provisions: … b) Golden Gate Parkway and Collier Blvd. Special Provisions: … c) Neighborhood Center Transitional Conditional Uses Provisions: … d) Transitional Conditional uses: … Recommended Policies: • Protect the low-density character of the Estates by resisting private petitions to change the GGAMP existing residential land use designations in the GGAMP, other than the limited locations described below. • Allow applications for rezoning to upsize existing Neighborhood Centers to accommodate ingress and egress, parking, buffering, water management, well, septic or package plant siting, future right-of way expansion or additional open space not to exceed 20 acres per quadrant. This provision does not guarantee that upsizing will be granted, but provides an opportunity to request commercial rezoning based on the above-stated needs. • Allow conditional use or C-1 rezone applications for the Immokalee Rd. corridor (Oaks area). This provision does not guarantee approval, but allows appl ication without amendment to the GMP (5 parcels affected). • Add an additional locational criterion for conditional uses to include major roadway intersections, defined as the intersection of a 4-lane roadway (or greater) with a 4-lane roadway (or greater), as identified in the Long-Range Transportation Plan. Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 43 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 589 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) • Adjust the Golden Gate Parkway Special Provisions to allow conditional use applications for properties at the intersection of Golden Gate Pkwy. and Santa Barbara Blvd. • Adjust the Collier Blvd. Special Provisions to allow the same locational criteria as currently allowed at other locations in Golden Gate Estates. • Allow conditional use applications at any location (of at least 2.25 acres) in Golden Gate Estates for the erection of communication towers, without need to amend the GGAMP. • Develop architectural standards in the Land Development Code that apply to commercial, conditional and public facility uses in the rural Estates to create coherence and area identity that reflect the rural character of the area. • Seek public acquisition of appropriate parcels, with conditional use approval, for “park and ride” uses, to serve private carpooling, public transit and emergency prevention and response program activities. • In its review and adoption of GMP amendments to the RFMUD and the RLSA, the County should reflect the need for appropriate buffers and setbacks from adjoining Golden Gate Estates properties, with specific development standards in the LDC. • Where GMP Amendments or Rezoning actions require written notice to homeowners within a given distance of the subject parcel, notice requirements shall also be extended the length of any dead-end street or avenue where a direct transportation or aesthetic impact can be reasonably anticipated. • Following the completion of the Randall Boulevard and Oilwell Road Corridor Study, the Zoning Division shall evaluate the future land uses along Immokalee Road in the vicinity of Randall Boulevard and Oil Well Road and make recommendations to the Board of County Commissioners for any proposed changes to the future land use. Transportation and Mobility Estates residents expressed their views on several transportation-related topics. Among other issues, peak hour conditions capture the attention of residents who face congestion on a recurring basis. Beyond immediate concerns, the public expressed preferences for long term considerations. These include bridge priorities, I-75 access, lime rock roads, route alternatives, greenways and pathways, road design and park and ride facilities. Many transportation projects are expressed in existing Plan language. Augmentation of these provisions are suggested to convey preference and direction for future consideration. At the heart of the transportation discussion is the Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP), adopted in 2015 by the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO). Of note , as shown on Figure 22, within the road network are planned improvements to Wilson Blvd. North and South, as well as the extension of Vanderbilt Beach Rd. to 8th Ave, NE. Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 44 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 590 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) The Collier MPO is a federally mandated and federally funded transportation policy-making organization and is made up of representatives of local governing bodies. The MPO has the authority to plan, prioritize, and select transportation projects for federal funding appropriated by the US Congress through the US Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration and Federal Transit Administration. In addition to Estates residents, Collier County citizens, taxpayers and visitors are also stakeholders in the transportation and mobility concepts involving Golden Gate Estates. The synergy expected between the surrounding Rural Fringe Mixed-Use District and Rural Land Stewardship Area village and town development with the largely resident ial Estates area is a prime example. Retail, service and job opportunities in and around future towns and villages will result in shorter trip lengths for current and future Estates residents, when compared with trip lengths today. In addition Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 45 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 591 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) to shorter trip lengths, north-south and reverse direction trips, particularly at peak hours, will be a positive factor in road infrastructure demand and resulting levels of service. This synergy was also highlighted in recommendations in the County’s Master Mobility Plan (MMP), accepted by the Board in 2012. Recommendation #3 in the MMP calls for incentivized goods, services and jobs in Neighborhood Centers, the RFMUD Villages and the Orangetree Settlement area to reduce the vehicle miles travelled by estates residents. Mobility related to the Estates is also addressed by Recommendation #9, enhanced localized connectivity through bridges and other connectors, and by Recommendation #13, development of park and ride lots. These concepts are further discussed below. As noted on the 2040 LRTP cost feasible plan, the MPO has designated additional study areas in and around the Estates. The Randall Rd./Oil Well Rd. study is currently underway. The North Belle Meade Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 46 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 592 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) study area is not yet funded. Staff recommends funding f or route alternatives study of the North Belle Meade east/west corridors in order to accommodate area planning efforts in the North Belle Meade Receiving area and to provide linkage for Estates residents travelling to south Collier County and the urban area. Funding will need to be identified for alignment, design and ROW acquisition. Bridge Connectivity within Golden Gate Estates Existing GGAMP objectives stress the importance of increasing linkages within the local road system to reduce traffic on arterial roadways, shorten trips and increase overall road capacity. In addition, coordination with emergency services officials is mandated for County staff and MPO. In August 2008, the Collier County Transportation Services Division produced the East of 951 Horizon Study for Bridges. The study included stakeholder input from Emergency service providers, environmental groups and other County Divisions. The study considered emergency service response times, evacuation needs, public service efficiencies, general mobility improvements and public sentiment. Design and cost considerations were components of the study, but costs have increased significantly since that study was completed. Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 47 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 593 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) The outcome of the study prioritized eleven bridge construction projects in eastern Golden Gate Estates. Subsequently, three (3) bridges have been programmed : • 8th St. NE at Cypress canal (fully funded) • 16th St. NE at Cypress Canal (partially funded) • 47th Ave NE at Golden Gate Canal (partially funded) Staff is currently seeking full funding via gas tax revenue funding for the 16th St. NE and 47th Ave. NE bridges. Each bridge costs approximately $8m to $9m (2016 figures) to construct. During public outreach, the GGEACA urgently requested consideration for a fourth high pr iority bridge, located at 10th Ave. SE at the Faka Union canal. This request was based on public safety concerns, in the contexts of emergency response and emergency evacuation. The recommendation was endorsed by North Collier Fire and Rescue. For this rea son, the initial recommendation below calls for an update to the bridge study within the next 2 years. As of this writing, County staff has begun planning for the public outreach associated with the updated study. A provision currently in the GGAMP specifically calls for the construction of a north-south bridge on 23d St., SW, as one of three alternatives to address emergency evacuation. As emergency services and evacuation concepts will be foremost in the bridge evaluation and update, this provision is recommended for removal from the GGAMP. Concerns were raised about the cost components of sidewalks and bike lanes on and leading to all bridges, both with respect to right-of-way acquisition and construction. Therefore, the updated study should include prioritization, design alternatives and cost components. The requirement for sidewalks and bike lanes leading to new bridges should be reviewed in the context of the individual bridge location. Eight of the initial eleven bridges are depicted on Figure 24. Additional locations will be studied as part of the Bridge Study Update. I-75 Interchange The GGAMP currently calls for coordination between the County and FDOT to implement a study of a potential interchange “in the vicinity of I-75 and Everglades Blvd.” In 2012, the County petitioned FDOT to consider an interchange through the submission of an Interchange Justification report (IJR). At that time, FDOT concluded that it could not recommend forwarding the IJR to the federal Highway Administration. Subsequently, the Board approved a course of action that would request emergency access to I-75 (now approved), consider an updated IJR between 2020 and 2025, and to “continue Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 48 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 594 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) to work with FDOT, other permitting agencies and NGOs to complete an environmental impact assessment and mitigation plan”. By the use of the term “in the vicinity of I-75 and Everglades Blvd., staff understands this as allowing alternative locations within Sections 31 through 34, T49 S, R28 E, and proposes this specificity for the GGAMP. Accordingly, the current GGAMP language should be updated to include the IJR submission in coordination with the MPO and its LRTP, and continuation of environmental assessments in coordination with all stakeholders, if feasible from a cost/benefit standpoint. It should be noted that emergency (limited) access to I-75 was granted subsequent to the 2012 IJR submission. In addition to I-75 access, concerns were raised by residents and by the GGEACA regarding traffic conditions on Everglades Blvd. The residents and association would like to protect against the possibility of expanding Everglades Blvd. beyond 4 lanes. For this reason, a recommendation appears below to limit expansion of Everglades Blvd. to no more than 4 lanes, as shown on the 2040 LRTP Needs Assessment. At a GGEACA meeting in November 2017, it was suggested that the 4-lane design maximum apply to all future roads to and through Golden Gate Estates. That idea does not appear as a recommendation because its more appropriate path for consideration is through the Collier County MPO. Lime Rock Roads The GGAMP calls upon the Transportation Department to explore alternative financing methods to accelerate paving of lime rock roads in the Estates. As of 2016, there were 29 miles of unpaved roads remaining in the Estates. At the current rate of nearly 3 miles per year, all lime rock roads would be paved in approximately 10 years. Residents have commented that an acceleration of paving may be more cost -efficient. Lime rock roads require maintenance costs that may be somewhat higher than paved roads. Additionally, the added ad valorem revenue potential from home values that appreciate due to improved road access may also influence the cost/benefit assessment. Staff recommends that the County update the study the relative costs and benefits of paving lime rock roads on an accelerated basis, and provide the study result to the Board with 2 years of adoption. More recently, the BCC embarked on a budgeting schedule that would provide sufficient funds over a three-year period to complete the paving of lime rock roads. Accordingly, the recommendations Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 49 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 595 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) include an alternative recommendation that the County will budget for the completion of paving in fiscal years 2018 through 2020. Greenways The GGAMP calls for a public network of greenway corridors that connect public lands and permanently protected green space, emphasizing use by non-motorized vehicles and using the existing or future public rights-of-way. The Collier MPO 2012 “Comprehensive Pathways Plan” provides the vision for a Greenways and Trails Program as a separate network from the overall Pathways Program. It notes that the provision of off -road facilities addresses safety and comfort concerns of pedestrians and bicyclists. This would allow a more focused approach to greenways and the identified entity to secure funding and expertise. As noted in the public outreach surveys, a majority of citizens favor the retention of this concept to create a greenways program. The GGAMP policy should be updated, however, to encourage coordination between the County Parks and Recreation Division and the MPO to identify areas of responsibility in planning, funding and implementation of a greenway plan. Road Design Eastern Estates residents commented on various aspects of road design for both new and expanded roadways. As communicated through the GGEACA, preferences include a rural road design without curbs and gutters, Florida Friendly (depressed) medians to the extent landscaping would be employed, and a preference for eminent domain on one side of an existing local street rather than partial takings on both sides. While these preferences are noted here, the MPO and the County Transportation Division design with specific site requirements that vary from one location to another. Moreover, these elements are best suited for review and public comment under the statutory public vetting requirements of those agencies. As such, the GGAMP should remain silent on these design preferences. Park and Ride Lots See Land Use/Non-residential Uses. Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 50 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 596 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) GOAL 6: To provide for a safe and efficient county and local roadway network, while at the same time seeking to preserve the rural character of golden gate estates in future transportation improvements within the golden gate area. OBJECTIVE 6.1: Increase the number of route alternatives for traffic moving through the Golden Gate Area in both east-west and north-south directions, consistent with neighborhood traffic safety considerations, and consistent with the preservation of the area’s rural character. Policy 6.1.1: In planning to increase the number of route alternatives through the Estates Area, the Collier County Transportation Division will prioritize the following routes over other alternatives: a. The extension of Vanderbilt Beach Road from its current terminus to DeSoto Boulevard. b. The development of a north-south connection from the eastern terminus of White Boulevard to Golden Gate Boulevard. c. The development of a new east-west roadway crossing the Estates Area south of Golden Gate Boulevard. Policy 6.1.2: Collier County shall continue to coordinate with the Florida Department of Transportation to implement a study of a potential interchange in the vicinity of I-75 and Everglades Boulevard. OBJECTIVE 6.2: Increase linkages within the local road system for the purposes of limiting traffic on arterials and major collectors within Golden Gate Estates, shortening vehicular trips, and increasing overall road system capacity. Policy 6.2.1: The County shall continue to explore alternative financing methods to facilitate both east- west and north-south bridging of canals within Golden Gate Estates. Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 51 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 597 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Planning and right-of-way acquisition for bridges within the Estates Area local road system shall make adequate provision for sidewalks and bike lanes. Policy 6.2.3: Sidewalks and bike lanes shall provide access to government facilities, schools, commercial areas and the planned County greenway network. OBJECTIVE 6.3: Coordinate with local emergency services officials in planning and constructing road improvements within Golden Gate Estates and Golden Gate City to ensure that the access needs of fire department, police and emergency management personnel and vehicles are met. Policy 6.3.1: The Collier County Transportation Planning Section shall hold at least one annual public meeting with Golden Gate Area emergency services providers and the local civic association in order to ensure that emergency needs are addressed during the acquisition of right-of-way for design and construction of road improvements. Policy 6.3.2: The Collier County Transportation Division shall continue to coordinate with Golden Gate Area emergency services providers to prioritize necessary road improvements related to emergency evacuation needs. GOAL 7: To protect the lives and property of the residents of the greater Golden Gate area, as well as the health of the natural environment, through the provision of emergency services that prepare for, mitigate, and respond to, natural and manmade disasters. OBJECTIVE 7.2: Ensure that the needs of all applicable emergency ser vices providers are included and coordinated in the overall public project design for capital improvement projects within the Golden Gate Area. Policy 7.2.1: Preparation of Collier County’s annual Schedule of Capital Improvements for projects within the Golden Gate Area shall be coordinated with planners, or the agents or representatives with planning responsibilities, from the Fire Districts, public and private utilities, Emergency Medical Services Department and the Collier County Sheriff’s Department to ensure that public project designs are consistent with the needs of these agencies. Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 52 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 598 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Policy 7.2.2: Planners, or the agents or representatives with planning responsibilities, from the Golden Gate Fire Control and Rescue District, Collier County Emergency Medical Services Department and the Collier County Sheriff’s Department will receive copies of pre-construction plans for capital improvement projects in the Golden Gate Area and will be invited to review and comment on plans for the public projects. OBJECTIVE 7.3: Develop strategies through the County Growth Management Division – Planning and Regulation for the enhancement of roadway interconnection within Golden Gate City and the Estates Area, including interim measures to assure interconnection. Policy 7.3.1: The Collier County Bureau of Emergency Services, the Collier County Transportation Division, Golden Gate Fire Control and Rescue District, and other appropriate Federal, State or local agencies, shall begin establishing one or more of the following routes for emergency evacuation purposes: a. An I-75 Interchange in the vicinity of Everglades Boulevard. b. Improved emergency access from Everglades Boulevard to I-75. c. Construction of a north-south bridge on 23rd Street, SW, between White Boulevard and Golden Gate Boulevard. Policy 7.3.2: All new residential structures shall comply with NFPA (National Fire Protection Association, Incorporated) 299 Standard for Protection of Life and Property from Wildfire, 1997 Edition, as adopted by reference in the Florida Fire Code or the most recent edition. Policy 7.3.3: Modified portions of existing structures shall meet NFPA Standards through the adoption of appropriate regulations in the County Building Codes. Policy 7.3.4: County-owned property within Golden Gate Estates shall be subject to an active, on-going management plan to reduce the damage caused by wildfires originating from County-owned properties. Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 53 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 599 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) • The County Transportation Planning Section shall provide an update to the 2008 East of CR 951 Bridge Study with recommendations based on emergency response, evacuation times, cost components and other considerations to the Board within 2 years of adoption of this policy. • Everglades Blvd. between Golden Gate Blvd. and I-75 shall not be expanded beyond 4 lanes. • The County shall coordinate with FDOT and the MPO’s 2045 LRTP to submit a revised Interchange Justification Report for an interchange at I -75 in the vicinity of Everglades Blvd (T 49, R 28, S 31-34). • The County will update and report on the timing of the paving of lime rock roads, including a cost/benefit analysis for accelerated programming, within 2 years of adoption of this policy; Alt.: The County will budget the full completion of the paving of lime rock roads in fiscal years 2018 through 2020. • Planning, funding and implementation of potential greenway trails shall be coordinate d under the MPO’s Comprehensive Pathways Plan in coordination with the County’s Parks and Recreation Division. • Seek public acquisition of appropriate parcels, with conditional use approval, for “park and ride” uses, to serve private carpooling, public transit and emergency prevention and response program activities. • Encourage the MPO’s identification of funding sources for design and ROW acquisition of an east-west arterial roadway into North Belle Meade to facilitate land use planning in that area. Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 54 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 600 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Watershed and Related Water Resource Topics In 2011, the Board accepted the Collier County Watershed Management Plan (WMP), which was developed over several years by staff and consultants. The WMP covered the major basins within Collier County, including the Golden Gate/Naples Bay Watershed. The underlying study included an evaluation of the surface water and groundwater, wetlands and related environmental resources, and the performance of the current water management facilities in providing the desired levels of services for flood control, water supply, water quality and environmental protection. It recommended initiatives that would serve as a guide for staff in developing policies, programs, ordinances and regulations for further consideration by the Board. The major water resource concerns identified for the GGAMP region include: • Excessive fresh water discharges from canals into Naples Bay • Lack of appropriate levels of flood protection • Pollutant loading associated with development and land use activities • Aquifer impacts due to reduced recharge and increased withdrawals Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 55 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 601 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Notably, among the WMP ranking of projects for ben efit to cost ratio, the Golden Gate Estates Flowway Restoration project scored highest. Accordingly, the North Golden Gate Estates (NGGE) Flowway Restoration Project ensued. Its purpose was to reconnect the primary wetland flowways in the Estates area, particularly the major wetlands of Horsepen Strand and Winchester Head for eventual restoration of the flowway connection from NGGE to the historic Henderson Creek/Belle Meade watershed as shown on Figure 25. The Study was completed in 2013, funded in part by FDEP and SFWMD. As a result of the Study, the historic and remnant flowway connections were identified and a plan was recommended. As a first phase of its implementation, 42 new culverts were installed in selected sections of NGGE and the project was completed in August 2014. The study also yielded a conceptual design for diversion of stormwater into North Belle Meade. In 2016, as part of an application for BP settlement “RESTORE” funds, the Collier County Comprehensive Watershed Improvement Plan was developed and accepted by the Board. This plan, co-sponsored by Rookery Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve, outlines a rehydration effort designed to provide greater balance between the Rookery Bay and Naples Bay estuaries, through diversion of a portion of Golden Gate Canal flows to the Belle Meade area. The RESTORE funds are intended to aid in design and implementation of the project. A depiction of the area in relation to watersheds appears in Figure 26. Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 56 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 602 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) In 2017, as part of the implementation of a non-structural WMP recommendation, the Board adopted newly revised surface water maximum allowable discharge rates, now applied to development in 16 additional County basins, including the main Golden Gate Canal Basin. The reduced allowable discharge rates convey County-wide benefits, but it should be noted that they do not apply to single family parcels, such as those previously platted in Golden Gate Estates. Additionally, the Board amended stormwater standard s in 2017, directly impacting Estates lot development. The amendment requires a stormwater plan for all lots and provides a new threshold for engineered plans based on percentage of impervious lot coverage. This addresses site specific issues but does not address area-wide stormwater concerns. The aquifers beneath the Estates provide potable water supplies to residents of the Estates, and to customers of the two major public water utilities serving City of Naples and County residents. In meetings with Golden Gate Estates residents and with the GGEACA, a strong preference emerged regarding conservation principles related to the protection of water resources. Ideas and support for those ideas included wetland preservation initiatives and aquifer health. Residents and community leaders value the relationships among components of water policy: floodplain management (dispersion and diversion), water quantity and quality, aquifer recharge, salt water intrusion and estuary health. The following subsections reflect ideas and comments presented by residents and considered by County staff. Necessarily, most of these ideas will require additional study and debate, and therefore appear as aspirational recommendations. Lot Combinations Most of Golden Gate Estates was platted into 5 acre tracts by Gulf American Land Corporation (GAC), the developer of the Estates, although many larger and smaller lots were also platted . The Land Development Code currently allows lot splits into parcels no smaller than 2.25 acres with frontage of at least 150 feet. However, that was not always the case. Smaller lot splits were allowed in the past: prior to Oct. 14, 1974 in the former “Coastal Area Planning District” and prior to Jan. 5, 1982 in the former “Immokalee Area Planning District”. These legal non-conforming lots (sometimes referred to as “band-aid lots”) abound in the Estates, both in the western area, Figure 27, and in the eastern area, Figure 28. Of the 27,250 total parcels in the Estates, 7,275 are non-conforming. Of those, 3,397 (nearly half) are not yet developed. Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 57 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 603 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Citizens and representatives of the GGEACA suggested that these lots might be re -combined, if possible, through an incentive- based system. The rationale behind recombining these smaller lots relates to water benefits- watershed, floodplain, aquifer and estuary related. It has been said by a former District 5 Commissioner, that protection of this low-density area translates to a “County DRGR (density reduction, groundwater recharge) area without cost to the County.” It follows that further density reduction in the Estates can enhance these benefits. Larger lot sizes with relatively less impervious area generate less run-off per lot, and contribute to surface water attenuation, water quality benefits, floodplain storage capacity, aquifer recharge and less flow or “pulse” to canals and estuaries. Ideas to incentivize small lot recombination have included tax incentives, impact fee reduction and credits for stormwater stewardship, if a stormwater utility is created. Not all potential solutions will suit every situation. For example, it would be possible to recombine vacant parcels to create a larger parcel with any of the above suggestions. On the other hand, combining a vacant 1.14-acre parcel with another developed lot takes impact fee credits out of the equation. Moreover, the legal and fiscal basis for implementing incentives requires further study and Board direction. Ad valorem tax abatement would require a referendum before County voters. Impact fee credits may necessarily require a study to keep overall impact fees in a neutral revenue position. The costs and benefits of all incentives need further study to determine fiscal impact and Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 58 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 604 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) quantifiable benefits. For these reasons, the recommendation related to this initiative supports further study within a defined time period to implement any incentives for recombination. Following the study, if the Board directs implementation, its provisions would be contained in the Land Development Code or Code of Ordinances. Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) credits in the Estates Community Planning staff attended numerous Comprehensive Watershed Improvement Plan Ad Hoc Technical Advisory Board (CWIP) meetings, exchanging concepts related to the existing TDR program (RFMUD) and potential Golden Gate Estates initiatives. One idea that gained attention was the potential issuance of TDR credits as part of a sale or donation proposal for parcels within current or future acquisition areas. The examples of two specific wetland sites, Red Maple Swamp and Winchester Head within the Conservation Collier acquisition areas were discussed and studied. The “Gore” properties and surrounding area could also be considered. The CWIP committee understood its role as a technical advisory committee, and not a policy advisory committee. Accordingly, by motion at its March 7, 2017 meeting, CWIP recommended the concept of using TDRs for acquisition of select wetland parcels as “consistent with CWIP goals in improving the floodplain, surface hydrology, aquifer recharge and connectivity of the watershed”. In the Committee’s view, a recommendation beyond consistency would have exceeded their scope. In the meantime, the Board considered the idea of external (outside of RFMUD Sending lands) sources of TDR credits at its RFMUD Workshops in January, May and June of 2017. Staff had Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 59 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 605 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) recommended a modest allowance of TDR credits as part of an acquisition program in Golden Gate Estates, if the number of credits would have a nominal effect on overall TDR supp ly and price. Staff also noted that implementation could be difficult within the same RFMUD currency or domain, because property values are much different in the Estates as compared to RFMUD Sending Lands. The Board did not reach any consensus on this issu e, but held it open for later discussion. Given the complexity of the evaluation and completion of the RFMUD Restudy, staff is now of the opinion that acquisition of Estates lots for stormwater benefits using RFMUD TDR credits should not be pursued. As stated by some RFMUD stakeholders, a closed system, at least on the supply side, should be more predictable while avoiding the dilution of currency to Sending Land owners. One alternative is the further study of a second credit system, (Transfer of Developm ent Units or TDUs), which could direct Estates density values to urban development. This could be considered in the context of County (or other agency) ownership of quality wetland or high habitat value locations. The related recommendation, below, suggests an evaluation in a timeframe directed by the Board. Dispersed Water Management The Golden Gate Estates Area Civic Association has also been in favor of the concept of dispersed water management (DWM) as a means of attenuating stormwater to the benefit of residents. The typical Estate lot is 660 feet deep, encouraging the owner to construct a home and accompanying impervious areas (driveways, parking, etc.) close to the roadway. This leads to stormwater run -off to roadside swales with eventual conveyance to the nearest primary or secondary canals. Several recent studies (including the Watershed Management Plan (2011), have indicated that the present system of conveyance and treatment of stormwater run -off in the Estates is deficient in providing the desired levels of service for flood protection, water quality improvement, groundwater recharge, fire protection and restoration of historic flowways. Protection of water resources in this area is critical to the health of the public water supply, including wellfields for Collier County and the City of Naples. The road and drainage infrastructures have virtually eliminated some of the historic wetland flowways, leading to exotic infestation, draw-down of the water table and severity of wildfires. As the extent of impervious area continues to grow, the antiquated canals and swales cannot fully accommodate runoff, leading to frequent nuisance flooding. Major structural modifications to the current conveyance system does not appear feasible, either environmentall y, economically, or socially (if private property rights are encroached). Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 60 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 606 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) DWM is a means to reduce the full impact of single family development on water resources and management. To the extent that homeowners can attenuate stormwater runoff in quantity and quality before it reaches swales and canals, the better County water goal s may be achieved. To be sure, DWM is not a “one size fits all” solution. Parcels with very little wetlands on or nearby may be able to detain some water toward the back of the lot, so long as detention is very temporary, its elevation is sufficiently above the wet season water table and does not interfere with the proper functioning of septic systems. Properties with high percentages of wetland areas might require an engineered solution and/or an incentive-based approach to convey drainage easements to the County at relevant locations. The best proposal for DWM on single family Estates lots will be simple to understand and apply. Consideration should be given to regulatory approaches (required detention or limited fill quantity) and incentive-based approaches and whether to apply various rules to developed and undeveloped properties. Among other ideas, abatement of stormwater utility billing can be considered. Study and public input on a regulatory approach for new home construction should be included. The Restudy recommends a formal study of solutions that will be equitable, reasonable in cost, and understandable to land owners. The study feasibility should commence as funding becomes available. At its meeting on November 8, 2017, the Floodplain Management Advisory Committee found, by motion, that DWM would be an important feasibility study for application to the Estates. Potential of the C-1 Canal and other Golden Gate Canal Relievers The GGEACA spoke in favor of further improvements to the connector C-1 canal. The C-1 connector provides a 1.7 mile east-west link from the Golden Gate Main Canal to the Miller Canal. Due in part to numerous crossings that have constrained its effectiveness, the C-1 has historically played a minor role, serving as an equalizer depending on the head differential between the Golden Gate and Miller Canals. In view of its strategic location, improvements to the canal’s capacity could add operational flexibility and allow Golden Gate Main outflows to be moved south by the Miller Canal. In addition, this initiative would also require design and placement of an in-line gated structure to control flow exchanges, and ensure that desired flow directions are achieved. The concept of Aquifer Storage and Recovery systems was also encouraged by the GGEACA to divert wet season flows from the Golden Gate Canal. This is another capital-intensive initiative, and the Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 61 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 607 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) County should continue to study costs, feasibility and possible implementation as a lon g-term beneficial initiative. Finally, flood control can be more easily measured, predicted and accommodated by coordinating with the South Florida Water Management District to review their Level of Service Standards for primary water management canals within the County. Educational Components Many of the concepts noted above or measures currently in place should be augmented by public education efforts where possible. Residents, potential buyers and builders of single family homes in the Estates would be well served by a better understanding of water-related issues and programs, and how these serve their self-interests. Wetland maintenance, aquifer recharge, floodplain protection and Firewise concepts should be stressed. As an example, builders and land owners should become aware of the benefits of adding “freeboard” to building plans, which will provide even greater flood prevention beyond current base flood elevations (BFE) standards, as well as providing National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) discounts in premium. Other Watershed Management Plan Initiatives The structural (S) and non-structural (NS) projects listed in the table below were derived during the development of the County’s Watershed Management Plan, and have particular relevance to Golden Gate Estates. These projects have the potential to benefit the Golden Gate Estates community by addressing flood control, water supply, water quality, and environmental protection and restoration. Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 62 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 608 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Table 1: Selected Structural (S) and Non-structural (NS) Water management Improvements in GGAMP Recommended by WMP Project Name Watershed Project Description Comments/Status (S) North Golden Gate Estates Flowway Restoration Project (Winchester Head and Horsepen Strand) Golden Gate Canal, Naples Bay and Henderson Creek – Belle Meade Reestablish habitat and hydrologic connectivity along two wetland strands for eventual restoration of the historic flowway to the Rookery Bay Watershed * Two feasibility and modeling studies have been completed; and, a network of 42 culverts was installed in project’s first phase. *Funding and evaluation of other project segments are needed (NS) North Golden Gate Estates Land Acquisition for Winchester Head Wetlands Preservation Golden Gate Canal, Naples Bay & Faka Union Canal Multi-parcel (60 ) acquisition within the Winchester Head area *Land donations are accepted through the offsite preservation provision of the LDC *Funding for acquisition and/or additional land donations is needed (S) Corkscrew Regional Ecosystem Watershed/East Bird Rookery Swamp Hydrologic Restoration Enhancement Golden Gate Canal & Cocohatchee Hydrologic restoration by berm removal, vegetation control, ditch blocks and flowway redirection *Project scope has been defined *Funding is needed (S) Northern GGE, Unit 53 Acquisition and Restoration Golden Gate Canal & Cocohatchee Wetland restoration in the area of Shady Hollow Rd. Ext.and 38th Ave. N.W. Ext. by berm removal and exotic vegetation control *Project scope has been defined *Funding for land acquisition and restoration is needed (S) Golden Gate Canal Water Quality Improvements Golden Gate Canal & Naples Bay Six Tracts conveyed by GAC to Collier County totaling 33 acres, with 3,646 ft. of frontage along the GG canal system, to be used for isolated water quality treatment *Funding for feasibility study needed (NS) Stormwater Retrofit Project All Watersheds Restoration and protection of existing natural systems by establishing retrofit programs to address existing developments, public facilities and other areas that lack treatment *Retrofit options such as sewer inlet protection, debris collectors, and bio- swales have been identified by staff *Pond inventory and SOPs established for county owned facilities *County staff, in cooperation with the Water Symposium, to monitor county stormwater ponds and Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 63 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 609 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) establish Best Management Practices. *Ongoing efforts to establish new programs to meet project objectives Project Name Watershed Project Description Comments/Status (NS) Water Quality Monitoring Program All Watersheds Define water quality conditions in estuaries and along canal networks to achieve greater distribution in the groundwater monitoring network *Ongoing program that is periodically reevaluated and adaptively managed by the County’s Pollution Control staff. (Specific recommendations for monitoring completed in 2014) (NS) Verification of No Floodplain Impact All Watersheds Implement requirement for development to verify no impact upstream and downstream for the 100 yr./72-hr. design storm event *Modeling was used to evaluate future development alternatives on DFIRM base flood elevations (BFE) in GGE. The analysis of future build-out shows an increase of BFEs in the range of 0.25 – 0.5 feet assuming current development practices (fill placement for SF homes). This is well below the NFIP threshold of 1 ft. increase. *Consider implementation (NS) Flood Protection Levels of Service All Watersheds Propose a standard 25-yr design storm for drainage on arterial roads and 10-yr. design storm for collector and neighborhood roads to increase flood protection levels of service * SFWMD is modeling the primary canal system *County to follow with modeling of the secondary system *Staff to continue to refine concept for inclusion within the planning process for the CIP (NS) Low Impact Development (LID) Program All Watersheds Implementation of a LID program that would apply to all new development countywide *The Pollution Control Section is developing a LID manual to be used as a technical working document by the community At its November 8, 2017 meeting, the Floodplain Advisory Committee approved a motion in support of the Watershed Plan Initiatives as important to include within the GGAMP. Related to that, the GGEACA stressed the importance of hydrologic connections by suggesting that future acquisitions by Conservation Collier should prioritize hydrological benefits above other review criteria. The Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 64 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 610 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) recommendations include language in support of these concepts, and staff believes that the Conservation Collier recommendation should be fully vetted during the public hearing process. Growth Management Plan Policies Related Existing Provisions in the GGAMP OBJECTIVE 1.3: Protect and preserve the valuable natural resources within the Golden Gate area. Policy 1.3.0.1: The County shall protect and preserve natural resources within the Golden Gate area in accordance with the Objectives and Policies contained within Goals 6 and 7 of the Collier County Conservation and Coastal Management Element. Policy 1.3.1: The Collier County Environmental Services Department shall coordinate its planning and permitting activities within the Golden Gate Area with all other applicable environmental plannin g, permitting and regulatory agencies to ensure that all Federal, State and local natural resource protection regulations are being enforced. Policy 5.3.2: The Land Development Code shall continue to allow and further encourage the preservation of native vegetation and wildlife indigenous to the Estates Area. Policy 7.1.4: The Golden Gate Fire Control and Rescue District and the Collier County Bureau of Emergency Services shall hold one or more annual “open house” presentations in the Golden Gate Area emphasizing issues related to wildfires, flooding, emergency access and general emergency management. Generally: Conservation and Coastal Management Element Capital Improvement Element Stormwater Management Sub-element Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 65 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 611 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Recommended Policies • The County will continue to pursue the Watershed Management Plan initiatives as financial and staff resources become available. • The County will periodically coordinate with the South Florida Water Management District to review the Level of Service Standards for primary water management canals within the County. • The County will encourage the combination of parcels less than 2.25 acres in size with adjacent parcels, to preserve the low-density advantages within Golden Gate Estates. Within 2 years, GMD staff will recommend to the Board potential incentives to apply to developed and undeveloped lots. • The County will evaluate the potential for a second transfer of development units/rights program (TDU) to transfer density from Estates lots to the urban area, and will consider transfer of ownership options, in a timeframe directed by the Board. • The County will commence a formal study on the feasibility of dispersed water management (DWM) for single-family Estates lots, and determine whether a DWM initiative should be voluntary or mandatory and the extent to which the program should apply to developed and undeveloped properties. • The County will continue to identify and implement educational opportunities related to water resources for use by parcel owners, home owners, bu ilders, real estate professionals and the public to aid in understanding and addressing the owner’s financial and personal interests as well as area-wide impacts. • Acquisitions of parcels in Golden Gate Estates by Conservation Collier shall be consistent with Watershed Management Plan objectives, and shall prioritize hydrologic benefits above other review criteria. Wildfire Preparedness According to the Florida Forestry Service, Fire has always been a natural occurrence in South Florida. Sparked by lightning, wildfires cleared old brush and other fuels within forested areas. Biologists know the value of these periodic burns, as habitat and other natural values become refreshed. However, as population has moved further into the “wildlands” and development ha s dried the landscape, wildfires emerge as a very serious threat to people and property. Golden Gate Estates is situated within this urban/wildland interface. Community leaders have been aware of this threat for many years. The “Firewise” standards created for development in the Rural Fringe have been a part of the Land Development Code for well over Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 66 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 612 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 10 years. Policy provisions within the GGAMP are numerous, and have been part of the Master Plan for many years (see existing provisions, below). Concurrent with the GGAMP Restudy, the Board directed the Bureau of Emergency Services (BES) to provide an overview and recommendations related to wildfire risks, responsibilities and funding. In early 2017, current mitigation practices were outlined with recommendations for improvement. It was noted that brush fire calls per year have reached an average of 130. Springtime, 2017 came with hundreds of wildfires across the state, following a severe “dry season” that resulted in area-wide and state-wide drought. Collier County was particularly hard hit. A March wildfire burned over 7,000 acres in Picayune Strand State Forest. In April, the “3d Avenue Fire”, stoked by high winds, tore across the North Belle Meade area and narrowly missed more developed portions of Golden Gate Estates. Thousands of acres burned, thousands were evacuated, and seven homes were lost. At the Board’s direction, a multi-agency technical working group was formed under the existing structure of the Emergency Management Advisory Group. This working group was tasked with making recommendations to the Board by September, 2017, to address priorities for bolstering the County’s defenses against wildfires. It was noted that educational programs continue to provide excellent resources for self-help in mitigating individual property risks. Likewise, the Florida Forestry Service and the Independent Fire Districts, supported by mutual aid, were roundly applauded and appreciated for the excellent work performed in response to these events. While this working group has not reported its findings at time of this writing, funding issues in support of landscape scale mitigation activities will be at the center of attention. Funding for fire Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 67 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 613 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) break creation and maintenance and for prescribed burn activities needs augmentation. Several alternatives have been suggested to supply the Forest Service and Independent Districts with the tools and resources for a higher level of safety, including a Golden gate “fire utility fee” through an MSTU and general revenue funding. Also under review will be Land Development Code standards and Collier County Water Sewer District raw water access issues. Improvements to LDC language or permitting procedures are under review. A number of strategically located raw water wells have already been retrofitted for Fire Department use. As stated by Mr. Dan Summers, Division Director, BES, a community-wide effort to improve wildfire mitigation “is a marathon, not a sprint”. In other words, this is a hazard that must stay on the County’s radar for continual opportunities to enhance and support wildfire mitigation for many years to come. Continual opportunities should consider: • Effective and fair funding options • Resource readiness • Clear legal and procedural boundaries • Notifications and alerts • Mutual aid agreements and Interlocal Agreements • Educational components • Land planning opportunities Growth Management Plan Policies Related Existing Provisions in the GGAMP: GOAL 7: To protect the lives and property of the residents of the greater golden gate area, as well as the health of the natural environment, through the provision of emergency services that prepare for, mitigate, and respond to, natural and manmade disasters. OBJECTIVE 7.1: Maintain and implement public information programs through the Collier County Bureau of Emergency Services, Collier County Sheriff’s Department, Golden Gate Fire Control and Rescue District, and other appropriate agencies, to inform residents and visitors of the Greater Golden Gate Area regarding the means to prevent, prepare for, and cope with, disaster situations. Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 68 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 614 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Policy 7.1.1: The County, fire districts that serve the Golden Gate area, and other appropriate agencies, shall embark on an education program to assist residents in knowing and understanding the value and need for prescribed burning on public lands in high risk fire areas. Policy 7.1.2: The Golden Gate Fire Control and Rescue District and Collier County Bureau of Emergency Services shall actively promote the Firewise Communities Program through public education in Golden Gate Estates. Policy 7.1.3: The Collier County Land Development Services Department of the Growth Management Division shall evaluate the Land Development Code for Golden Gate Estates and shall eliminate any requirements that are found to be inconsistent with acceptable fire prevention standards. This evaluation process shall be coordinated with the Golden Gate Fire Control and Rescue District and the Collier County Bureau of Emergency Services. Policy 7.1.4: The Golden Gate Fire Control and Rescue District and the Collier County Bureau of Emergency Services shall hold one or more annual “open house” presentations in the Golden Gate Area emphasizing issues related to wildfires, flooding, emergency access and general emergency management. OBJECTIVE 7.2: Ensure that the needs of all applicable emergency services providers are included and coordinated in the overall public project design for capital improvement projects within the Golden Gate Area. Policy 7.2.1: Preparation of Collier County’s annual Schedule of Capital Improvements for projects within the Golden Gate Area shall be coordinated with planners, or the agents or representatives with planning responsibilities, from the Fire Districts, public and private utilities, Emergency Medical Services Department and the Collier County Sheriff’s Department to ensure that public project designs are consistent with the needs of these agencies. Policy 7.2.2: Planners, or the agents or representatives with planning responsibilities, from the Golden Gate Fire Control and Rescue District, Collier County Emergency Medical Services Department and the Collier County Sheriff’s Department will receive copies of pre-construction plans for capital improvement Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 69 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 615 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) projects in the Golden Gate Area and will be invited to review and comment on plans for the public projects. OBJECTIVE 7.3: Develop strategies through the County Growth Management Division – Planning and Regulation for the enhancement of roadway interconnection within Golden Gate City and the Estates Area, including interim measures to assure interconnection. Policy 7.3.1: The Collier County Bureau of Emergency Services, the Collier County Transportation Division, Golden Gate Fire Control and Rescue District, and other appropriate Federal, State or local agencies, shall begin establishing one or more of the following routes for emergency evacuation purposes: d. An I-75 Interchange in the vicinity of Everglades Boulevard. e. Improved emergency access from Everglades Boulevard to I-75. f. Construction of a north-south bridge on 23rd Street, SW, between White Boulevard and Golden Gate Boulevard. Policy 7.3.2: All new residential structures shall comply with NFPA (National Fire Protection Association, Incorporated) 299 Standard for Protection of Life and Property from Wildfire, 1997 Edition, as adopted by reference in the Florida Fire Code or the most recent edition. Policy 7.3.3: Modified portions of existing structures shall meet NFPA Standards through the adoption of appropriate regulations in the County Building Codes. Policy 7.3.4: County-owned property within Golden Gate Estates shall be subject to an active, on -going management plan to reduce the damage caused by wildfires originating from County-owned properties. Recommended Policies: • The County shall explore options for funding of wildfire prevention measures, including funding support for the Florida Forestry Service and Independent Fire Districts, including but not limited to a Golden Gate Estates MSTU and general fund revenue. Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 70 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 616 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) • The County will review and update as necessary all interlocal agreements and mutual aid agreements to assure coordination of legal, procedural and educational components of Wildfire prevention. • Update references to Independent Fire Districts. Lighting Standards A recent policy guide created at the request of the Board, entitled “Collier County Lighting Standards”, describes the importance of proper lighting for the health and welfare of County residents: “Well coordinated and designed lighting systems are an effective way to enhance the feeling of security and comfort throughout the County.” This policy guide became effective in 2017, and is intended to be updated periodically as standards and conditions change. It applies to County facilities such as roads, parks, public facilities and utility sites and will be incorporated into new and retrofitted lighting at all such locations. Consistency, economy and best management practices (BMP’s) are underscored. This policy guide mirrors a longstanding desire of Golden Gate Estates residents to protect their rural environment from light pollution. It is important to Estates residents for environmental reasons- both natural and human environments. Safety, aesthetics and the natural environment are fostered by best management practices lighting standards. Currently, the GGAMP provides specific guidance for street, parking and recreational lighting including appropriate fixture types such as “low pressure sodium” lamps. Appropriate shielding is also called out. These standards are well intentioned but in some cases limiting in that lighting technology changes more frequently than the Master Plan. Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 71 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 617 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) The desire for “dark sky” lighting standards in the Estates was strong- 90% of the public polled supported “dark sky” lighting standards. The public was not polled as to a voluntary or a regulatory approach. Given the County’s leadership role in researching and updating standards for its own facilities, this research can greatly benefit the Estates residents, both directly as public spaces are improved, and as a template for broader application moving forward. As the County transitions its lighting at new and renovated locations, more feedback and best practices can be discovered. In addition, a study of commercial lighting county-wide is planned. Given these advances, the recommended lighting policies for the Master Plan should reflect a flexible and updated approach. Broad language may be most suitable. More specific provisions will be incorporated into the LDC or referenced therein. Growth Management Plan Policies Related Existing provisions in the GGAMP: Objective 5.1: Provide for new commercial development within Neighborhood Centers. Policy 5.1.1: Consistent with public safety requirements, street, recreational and structure lighting within Golden Gate Estates shall be placed, constructed and maintained in such a manner as to prevent or reduce light pollution. In implementing this Policy, the County shall apply the following standards: a. If a streetlight or an area light is required, it shall be of the type specified to protect neighboring properties from direct glare. Area lighting shall be shielded such that direct rays do not pass property lines. Low-pressure sodium lamps are encouraged while halogen type lamps are discouraged. 1. Where required, the street lamp shall be of the high pressure sodium type and have a “cobra head with flat bottom” style or be fully shielded so that light is directed only downward. Street lamps shall be mounted on a wood pole at a height and wattage recommended by the appropriate electric utility and as appropriate for a rural area. 2. Parking lot lamps shall be low-pressure sodium type lamps and shall be mounted so that they point downward without direct rays extending past the parking lot, building entrance, walkway or other area intended to be illuminated. Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 72 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 618 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) b. Where lighting of recreational areas is required, such lighting shall be mounted so as to focus illumination on the areas intended to be illuminated, and to limit th e amount of light that extends outside of the intended area. c. This Policy shall not apply to Tract 124 and the north 150 feet of tract 126, Unit 12, Golden gate Estates, located in the southwest quadrant of the Wilson and Golden Gate Boulevards Neighborhood Center. Objective 5.3: Provide for the protection of the rural character of Golden Gate Estates. Recommended Policies: • Eliminate the specificity found in Policy 5.1.1; consider standards for the LDC. • County owned facilities shall comply with the Collier County Lighting Standards. • The County shall continue to coordinate with FDOT and FPL to provide guidance and reach agreement on roadway standards and security lights. • The County will consider lighting standards for commercial and other non -residential uses, and may provide specific Land Development Code standards for such uses within Golden Gate Estates consistent with its rural character and specific lighting zone classifications within. • The County will consider lighting standards for residential locations within Golden Gate Estates within the Land Development Code, and determine whether such standards will be encouraged or mandatory and the extent to which they apply to new or existing residential development. Septic Tank Service Golden Gate Estates is a very low density subdivision, where maximum allowed density is 1 unit per 2.25 acres. Given the cost and in-feasibility of supplying centralized water and wastewater service, residential development relies on well and septic systems. Centralized service was considered during the “East of 951 Services and Infrastructure Horizon Study” (2006). However, the estimated cost per parcel for water and wastewater ($112,000) far exceeded the benefit. Maintenance of septic systems in the Estates requires periodic pumping and removal of septage, among other maintenance costs. Residents expressed the concern over cost of service and legal disposal during the public outreach meetings, suggesting that the County should provide a processing facility within Collier County to keep costs and compliance within check. In addition, the Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 73 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 619 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) transport of this material outside the County typically involves more road miles traveled compared to in-County disposal. In a broader initiative, Collier County has embarked on an initi ative to create a “Bio-solids Management Facility” (BMF). The BMF would ideally result through solicitation for a build, design and operate entity selected by the Board, providing efficient and compliant processing of bio -solids, oils, grease, septage and similar by-products. The likely location for this facility would be the Resource Recovery Business Park located near the landfill. The outcome of the BMF initiative is expected to result in cost effective and environmentally sustainable treatment of these waste streams, producing energy and high quality fertilizer by-products. The BMF solicitation is currently in Step 2 of the solicitation, having narrowed the search to three qualified forms. Step 2 proposals are due in 2017, and an award of contract is an ticipated in early 2018. The selected entity will operate the facility for a minimum of 25 years, and design the facility so that it is expandable for future needs. Septage collection and treatment is part of the RFP; its efficacy is yet to be demonstrated. Growth Management Plan Policies Related existing provisions in the GGAMP: Objective 1.2: Ensure public facilities are provided at an acceptable level of service. Objective 1.3 Protect and preserve the valuable natural resources within the Golden Gate area. Objective 5.2 Balance the provision of public infrastructure with the need to preserve the rural ch aracter of Golden Gate Estates. Recommended Policy: • The County will continue to pursue a best management practices approach to making septage treatment available within Collier County, as a component of bio -solid processing, either directly or through a public private partnership. Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 74 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 620 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Preserve Exemption Currently the GMP and LDC require a portion of the native vegetative present on property to b e set aside as preserve when property is developed. Exceptions to this requirement include single -family home sites situated on individual lots or parcels, single lot splits or where property is used for agricultural purposes. Subdivision of land into three or more lots or parcels requires approval of a subdivision plat, which in turn triggers the requirement for a preserve, among other requirements. As the platting of the Golden Gate Estates predated this requirement, no preserves were required as part of its establishment. There are a limited number of lots within the Golden Gate Estates subdivision (depicted as the Estates Designation on the County’s Future Land Use Map (FLUM)) which could be divided into three or more lots, each a minimum of 2 ¼ acres size. Analysis by staff shows a total of 75 lots remaining in the Estates Designation, north of I-75, which could be subdivided as such (6.75 acres or more). These lots range from 6.78 acres to 12.97 acres, with all but two of these lots less than ten acres in size. Lot splits allow 2 parcels from a single tract, and because a re -plat is not required, lot splits fall squarely within the exemption to a required “preserve” area. Environmental staff believes it excessive to require small preserves for the remaining few lots that could be subdivided into three or more 2.25 acre single family lots. If subdivided as such, preserve requirements for all but two of these would be less than 1.33 acres, assuming they were entirely covered with native vegetation. Long term viability of these preserves is also a concern given their small size and location within a large single-family subdivision, with no other preserves or greenways to provide connection. Moreover, preserve exemptions for a limited number of 3 way splits would be consistent with the requirements of all other (12,000+) undeveloped Estates parcels. Related existing provisions in the GGAMP: Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME) Policy 6.1.1: “…native vegetation shall be preserved through the application of the following minimum preservation and vegetation retention standards and criteria…except for single family dwelling units situated on individual parcels…” Note; As interpreted by the LDC, “the single-family exception is not to be used as an exception from any calculations regarding total preserve area for a development containing single family lots” (Sec. 3.05.07 B). Recommended Policy: • The subdivision of tracts 13 acres or less in size within Golden Gate Estates shall not trigger preserve requirements under CCME Policy 6.1.1. Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 75 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 621 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Section 4: List of Initial Recommendations A. Golden Gate City 1. Land Use and Economic Vitality • Establish land use designations to protect established, stable, neighborhoods and provide opportunity for redevelopment and renewal through development practices that promote compatibility. • Support redevelopment of Golden Gate Parkway to provide for a viable pedestrian environment adding to the vibrancy and walkability of Golden Gate City. • Add land uses within the designated Activity Center intended to promote job growth and strengthen the economic health of Golden Gate City. • Protect the land uses allowing for diversity of residential housing. • Engage with the Golden Gate Civic Association and MSTU to further community planning programs. • Consider redevelopment tools such as an Innovation Zone to further economic development and redevelopment strategies. • Develop amendments to the Land Development Code to support and implement redevelopment initiatives including incentives for building remodeling and renovation. • Develop a branding and marketing plan for Golden Gate City. • Ensure pertinent incentive programs are made available to those seeki ng business creation and redevelopment opportunities in Golden Gate City. • Modify the land use designations along Golden Gate Parkway to create a consistent development pattern. • Add target industry uses to the Activity Center. • In the Santa Barbara Commercial Subistrict remove the one acre project minimum. 2. Transportation and Mobility • Support all transportation needs within Golden Gate City with an emphasis on walkability. Walkability will be improved through the implementation of the recommendations of the MPO’s Walkability Study. • Within the Activity Center, maintain multiple connections to the surrounding neighborhoods and through the Activity Center while providing safe and direct access to transit stops within or adjacent to the Activity Center. • Consider protecting alleys from vacating process where there is reasonable connection and continuity for future pathway corridors. • Initiate periodic speed studies in Golden Gate City and when appropriate, utilize traffic calming measures and speed limit reductions to ensure a safe pedestrian environment. Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 76 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 622 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 3. Environmental Stewardship • Maintain and expand sewer and water service in accordance with the Collier County Water and Sewer District Implementation Plan. B. Golden Gate Estates 1. Land Use and Economic Vitality • Protect the low-density character of the Estates by resisting private petitions to change existing residential land use designations in the GGAMP, other than the limited locations described below. • Allow applications for rezoning to upsize existing Neighborhood Centers to accommodate ingress and egress, parking, buffering, water management, well, septic or package plant siting, future right-of way expansion or additional open space not to exceed 20 acres per quadrant. This provision does not guarantee that u psizing will be granted, but provides an opportunity to request commercial rezoning based on the above-stated needs. • Allow conditional use or C-1 rezone applications for the Immokalee Rd. corridor (Oaks area). This provision does not guarantee approval, but allows application without amendment to the GMP (5 parcels affected). • Add an additional locational criterion for conditional uses to include major roadway intersections, defined as the intersection of a 4-lane roadway (or greater) with a 4-lane roadway (or greater), as identified in the LRTP. • Adjust the Golden Gate Parkway Special Provisions to allow conditional use applications for properties at the intersection of Golden Gate Pkwy. and Santa Barbara Blvd. • Adjust the Collier Blvd. Special Provisions to allow the same conditional use locational criteria as currently allowed at other locations in Golden Gate Estates. • Allow conditional use applications at any location in Golden Gate Estates for the erection of communication towers, without need to also amend the GGAMP. • Develop architectural standards in the Land Development Code that apply to commercial, conditional and public facility uses in the rural Estates to create coherence and area identity that reflect the rural character of the area. • Seek public acquisition of appropriate parcels, with conditional use approval, for “park and ride” uses, to serve private carpooling, public transit and emergency prevention and response program activities. • In its review and adoption of GMP amendments to the RFMUD and th e RLSA, the County should reflect the need for appropriate buffers and setbacks from adjoining Golden Gate Estates properties, with specific development standards in the LDC. Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 77 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 623 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) • Where GMP Amendments or Rezoning actions require written notice to homeowners wit hin a given distance of the subject parcel, notice requirements shall also be extended the length of any dead-end street or avenue where a direct transportation or aesthetic impact can be reasonably anticipated. • Following the completion of the Randall Bou levard and Oilwell Road Corridor Study, the Zoning Division shall evaluate the future land uses along Immokalee Road in the vicinity of Randall Boulevard and Oil Well Road and make recommendations to the Board of County Commissioners for any proposed changes to the future land use. 2. Transportation and Mobility • The County Transportation Planning Section shall provide an update to the 2008 East of CR 951 Bridge Study with recommendations based on emergency response, evacuation times, cost components and other considerations to the Board within 2 years of adoption of this policy. • Everglades Blvd. between Golden Gate Blvd. and I-75 shall not be expanded beyond 4 lanes. • The County shall coordinate with FDOT and the MPO’s 2045 LRTP to submit a revised Interchange Justification Report for an interchange at I -75 in the vicinity of Everglades Blvd (T 49, R 28, S 31-34). • The County will update and report on the timing of the paving of lime rock roads, including a cost/benefit analysis, within 2 years of adoption of this policy. Alt.: The County will budget the full completion of the paving of lime rock roads in fiscal years 2018 through 2020. • Planning, funding and implementation of potential greenway trails shall be coordinated among the County’s Parks and Recreation Division and the MPO. • The County will consider public acquisition of appropriate parcels, with conditional use approval, for “park and ride” uses, to serve private carpooling, public transit and emergency prevention and response program activities. 3. Environmental Stewardship Water Resources • The County will continue to pursue the Watershed Management Plan initiatives in Golden Gate as financial and staff resources become available. • The County will periodically coordinate with the South Florida Water Management District to review the Level of Service Standards for primary water management canals within the County. • The County will encourage the combination of parcels less than 2.25 acres in size with adjacent parcels, to preserve the low-density advantages within Golden Gate Estates. Within Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 78 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 624 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 2 years, GMD staff will recommend to the Board potential incentives to apply to developed and undeveloped lots. • The County will evaluate the potential for a second transfer of development units/rights program (TDU) to transfer density from Estates lots to the urban area, and will consider transfer of ownership options, in a timeframe directed by the Board. • The County will commence a formal study on the feasibility of dispersed water management (DWM) for single-family Estates lots, and determine whether a DWM initiative should be voluntary or mandatory and the extent to which the program should apply to developed and undeveloped properties. • The County will continue to identify and implement educational opportunities related to water resources for use by parcel owners, home owners, builders, real estate professionals and the public to aid in understanding and addressing the owner’s financial and personal interests as well as area-wide impacts. • Acquisitions of parcels in Golden Gate Estates by Conservation Collier shall be consistent with Watershed Management Plan objectives, and shall prioritize hydrologic benefits above other review criteria. Fire Control • The County shall explore options for funding wildfire prevention measures, including funding support for the Florida Forestry Service and Independent Fire Districts, including but not limited to a Golden Gate Estates MSTU and general fund revenue. • The County will review and update as necessary all interlocal agreements and mutual aid agreements to assure coordination of legal, procedural and educational components of Wildfire prevention. • Update references to Independent Fire Districts. Lighting • Eliminate the specificity found in Policy 5.1.1; consider standards for the LDC. • County owned facilities shall comply with the Collier County Lighting Standards. • The County shall continue to coordinate with FDOT and FPL to provide guidance and reach agreement on roadway standards and security lights. • The County will consider lighting standards for commercial and other non -residential uses, and may provide specific Land Development Code standards for such uses within Golden Gate Estates according to its overall rural character and specific lighting zone classifications within. • The County will consider lighting standards for residential locations within Golden Gate Estates within the Land Development Code, and determine whether such standards will be Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 79 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 625 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) encouraged or mandatory and the extent to which they apply to new or existing residential development. Other • The County will continue to pursue a best management practices approach to making septage treatment available within Collier County, as a component of bio -solid processing, either directly or through a public private partnership. • The subdivision of tracts 13 acres or less in size within Golden Gate Estates shall not trigger preserve requirements under CCME Policy 6.1.1. Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 80 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 626 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Appendix A Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy Public Outreach Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 81 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 627 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Introduction The Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) public outreach process included extensive public engagement. Residents and stakeholders were encouraged to provide input through multiple platforms including eight public workshops, staff presentations to both the Golden Gate City Civic Association and the Golden Gate Estates Civic Association, a user-friendly website with surveys, and communications through email distribution lists with approximately 330 stakeholders. As the GGAMP has the three distinct areas of Golden Gate City, the Eastern Estates (east of Collier Boulevard) and the Western Estates (west of Collier Boulevard), staff focused outreach to provide individual attention to each area. In this way, staff was able gauge the public’s perspective on unique differences in values and priorities. In part, these values can be visualized with the outcome of the first set of workshops where staff engaged the stakeholders to envision the future. A series of questions were asked through surveys that were distributed during the workshops and were posted on the dedicated GGAMP restudy website. The following word clouds summarize the values and expectations of those who participated in the process. The surveys and word clouds formed the basis for the communities’ vision statements. Staff first drafted the vision statements based on information provided, and at following public workshops the participants refined the statements. The goals, objectives and po licies of the GGAMP should recognize and implement these vision statements. Golden Gate City Vision Statement “Golden Gate City is a safe, diverse, family-oriented community that offers easy access to education, parks, shopping and services within a vibrant, walkable community.” Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 82 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 628 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Golden Gate Eastern Estate Vision Statement “The Golden Gate Eastern Estates is an interconnected, low-density residential community with limited goods and services in neighborhood centers, defined by a rural character with an appreciation for nature and quiet surroundings.” Golden Gate Western Estate Vision Statement “Golden Gate Western Estates is a low-density, large-lot residential neighborhood in a natural setting with convenient access to the coastal area.” Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 83 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 629 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Golden Gate Area Master Plan Eastern Estates - Introduction Public Workshop, April 20, 2016 As guests of the Golden Gate Estates Area Civic Association Introduction: At the invitation of the Golden Gate Estates Area Civic Association (GGEACA), Collier County planning staff introduced the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) restudy which will result in an update to the GGAMP. The purpose of the staff presentation was to identify the major components of the GGAMP, and particularly as it pertains to the Eastern Estates (east of CR 951) area. Emphasis was placed on major themes and the idea that visioning for the future should consider many factors as they contribute to the well-being of the next generation. Meeting Summary: Michael Ramsey, President of the Golden Gate Estates Area Civic Association opened the meeting. He greeted elected and appointed County and District officials, as well as various candidates fo r County Commission Districts 5 and 3. Approximately 125 community members or stakeholders attended the meeting. Mr. Ramsey described the purpose of the meeting as an introduction of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan update process, and asked residents to not get sidetracked with other specific topics that are not a part of the GGAMP. As an example, the issue of fracking should not be discussed, as it is not a Master Plan concept. Commissioner Tim Nance provided an overview of GGAMP in the context of other P lanning Restudies and the importance to the Golden Gate area residents. He reminded the group of the relevance of the “green map”, in that 0ver 75% of the County’s area is already in conservation status, and that the Rural Fringe Receiving Areas are among the last development areas left in the County; they can complement the Estates if carefully planned. He indicated that all four Restudy areas would consider the same important elements to help achieve consistency between Restudies: land use; transportation/mobility; water; environment; and economic vitality. He reported that an Oversight Committee has been appointed to help direct public involvement, consistency, sustainability and economic vitality, and introduced Jeff Curl, the Oversight Committee member representing the Golden Gate area. Community Planning Manager Kris Van Lengen provided a PowerPoint presentation, and stated that this would be the first of several GGAMP meetings, and that this first meeting is in the nature of an introduction. Content includes an update of relevant issues in the Rural Fringe Mixed-Use District Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 84 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 630 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Restudy, concepts currently embedded in the GGAMP, and finally a high-level visioning exercise for the future of the Eastern Estates. Consistent among all Restudies is the planning wheel- a process matrix that describes present plans, public outreach, staff data and analysis, development of alternatives, republication, ultimately with recommendations that reflect stakeholder consensus, and finally re -initiation of public outreach. The process may include several turns if the “wheel” prior to formal public hearings. A reflection of the current progress of the Rural Fringe Restudy included the fact that there was broad support among stakeholders to incentivize uses that are not presently adopted- most particularly free-standing employment centers and sports venues. GGEACA and attendees were encouraged to attend future Rural Fringe meetings- as close neighbors with commercial and mobility issues; they are true stakeholders in that process. The nexus among three Restudy areas, all within 3 miles of North Golden Gate Estates, was also noted, highlighting the total commercial activity in the area that would benefit the Estates while adding no further Golden Gate Estates Neighborhood Centers. A balance is needed among all commercial centers and activities. The discussion on current GGAMP provisions began with an overview of currently scheduled meetings, which will be rotational among Eastern Estates, Western Estates and Golden Gate City. A brief history described the major Restudy between 2001 and 2003 as well as the several private Growth Management Plan amendments that followed. Key features of the current GGAMP, as pertain to the Eastern Estates, were listed under the matrix described by Commissioner Nance. Interpreting the current goals of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan as it relates to the Estates, an “existing vision” was derived and described as a low density residential community with rural character, limited commercial services, safe and efficient roadways, and emergency services coordination. Principal Planner Anita Jenkins provided an interactive visioning session. She began by describing the nature and purpose of a community vision: what the community should look and feel like af ter implementation, as envisioned by residents. After discussing the purpose, Ms. Jenkins challenged the audience to complete brief answers or descriptions to a number of visioning questions: How does the Eastern Estates complement the County as a whole, what is it the best location for, what would you like to read in the newspaper about the area, 10 years from now, what things would you suggest to improve the area? Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 85 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 631 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Individual slips were distributed throughout, and attendees wrote their visions in answer t o these questions. A total of 45 full sets of questionnaires were returned. A summary of the written comments can be found here. It was announced that the questions would be available on the web site as a survey questionnaire for those that wished to provide input in that manner. Following the exercise, participants were encouraged to share their ideas. Various themes emerged, particularly the preservation of the rural character of the Eastern Golden Gate area. Some spoke in support of a sense of place, including renaming/rebranding the Eastern Estates and the streets, creating institutional and commercial architectural standards that are more suitable for the rural character. Other areas of importance were protecting important watershed areas, and creating greenways. Residents also wanted to discuss the Rural Lands West project, the Habitat Conservation Plan and noted fracking was a concern. Commissioner Nance addressed these topics and noted other venues and agencies will be covering these issues more thoroughly. The Community Planning agenda item on Golden Gate Area Master Plan introduction, concluded at 8:40; the GGEACA meeting agenda items resumed at this time. Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 86 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 632 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Golden Gate Area Master Plan Western Estates - Introduction Public Workshop, May 11, 2016, 6:30 PM Golden Gate Community Center Introduction: Collier County planning staff provided an introduction to the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) restudy which will result in an update to the GGAMP. The purpose of the staff presentation was to identify the major components of the GGAMP, particularly as it pertains to the Western Estates (west of CR 951) area. Emphasis was placed on major themes and the idea that visioning for the future should consider many factors as they contribute to the well -being of the next generation. Approximately 60 people attended. Meeting Summary: Greg Ault, Principal, AECOM, as consultant for public outreach, began by discussing his role in the process and the importance of area-wide planning as we think about future generations. He introduced his staff and County staff, and described his favorable impressions of the area from the point of view of a non-resident. Community Planning Manager Kris Van Lengen provided a PowerPoint presentation, and stated that this would be the first of several GGAMP meetings, and that this first meeting is in the nature of an introduction. Content includes an update of relevant i ssues in the four area Restudies, concepts currently embedded in the GGAMP, and finally a high level visioning exercise for the future of the Western Estates. Consistent among all Restudies is the planning process - one that looks at current provisions and conditions, asks what can be improved, alternatives for improvement, and ultimate decision-making by the Board of County Commissioners. Important focal points include permitted land uses, transportation issues, environment, and economic vitality. Citizens were encouraged to use on-line resources to supplement their understanding and provide input when surveys become available. Mr. Van Lengen presented the idea to study GGAMP in three separate segments: Eastern Estates, Western Estates and Golden Gate City. There were no objections raised to this approach. The history of the GGAMP was discussed, including the fact that ten amendments to the plan have occurred since the last major restudy was completed in 2003. After describing the organization of the GGAMP document, it was noted that the major provisions related to Goals, Objectives and Policies were identical to those of the Eastern Estates; low density, rural character, infrastructure and emergency services needs. Residents might consider whether they wish to emphasize a unique vision and goals. Unlike the Eastern Estates (approximately 50% built out), the Western Estates is 88% built out. Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 87 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 633 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) With respect to Land uses, permitted uses and conditional uses were described. Also noted was the special language in the GMP describing the limitation on additional conditional uses along the Golden Gate Parkway. The vast majority of the citizens who attended appeared to live within close proximity to Golden Gate Parkway. Accordingly, there was significant comment from the attendees related to the fact that they do not wish to change any of the current land use restrictions related to Golden Gate Parkway. Mr. Greg Ault asked for a show of hands in favor of no change to the land uses on the Parkway. There was nearly unanimous agreement, as shown in the photos below and by virtue of the responses received in the visioning session. Principal Planner Anita Jenkins provided an interactive visioning session. She began by describing the nature and purpose of a community vision: what the community should look and feel like after implementation, as envisioned by residents. After discussing the purpose, Ms. Jenkins challenged the audience to complete brief answers or descriptions to a number of visioning questions: How does the Western Estates complement the County as a whole, what is it the best location for, what would you like to read in the newspaper about the area, 10 years from now, what things would you suggest to improve the area? Individual slips were distributed throughout, and attendees wrote their visions in answer to these questions. A total of 45 full sets of questionnaires were returned. A summary of the written comments is shown below. It was announced that the questions would be available on the web site as a survey questionnaire for those who wished to provide input in that manner. Attendees expressed a strong desire to maintain the low-density residential character of their neighborhood with no commercial uses. Below is a summary of questionnaire responses: Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 88 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 634 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) I. The Western Estates will be Distinctive for:  Large lots near town with quiet, open and peaceful character  Rural beauty with traditional neighborhoods consisting of dead -end streets where neighbors know one another  No commercial uses or special uses, maintaining uncluttered thoroughfares  Natural habitat with areas for wildlife and environmental protection  Single-family living for local working families  Agriculturally and livestock friendly per allowances II. The Western Estates will be a premier location for:  Peaceful living with private single-family homes  Beautiful gateway to the City of Naples  Quiet estates residential living  Family and neighborly atmosphere safe for children  Low traffic  Small town feel  Wildlife and agriculture  A remote animal services substation to support domestic animals found in the area  Accessible to services while maintaining a rural character  Well maintained infrastructure  A predominantly residential community with supporting uses including senior housing along arterials.  Maintain distinction from Golden Gate City III. How does the Western Estates area complement Collier County?  Untouched and quiet nature maintains the charm of Naples area  A respite from commercial blight  Peaceful living close to town  Provides a non-gated, peaceful, estates-living neighborhood between the City of Naples and Golden Gate City  Serves as the gateway to Naples  Gives long-term residents a place to raise generations  Maintains the value of environmentally friendly neighborhood with little commercial uses  Unit 29 should be its own neighborhood, rather than part of Western Estates  Clean, crime-free area  Maintains true to the existing master plan  Provides affordable living for year-round residents Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 89 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 635 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption)  High value residential housing with limited commercial and special uses  Desire to be the “Pine Ridge Estates” of the area IV. What is the full potential for your community?  Safe, cohesive neighborhood for families  Desire to maintain privacy  Maintain the existing character, no need for further enhancements or intrusions  For the area of Unit 29 to be sub divided into its own area similar to Pine Ridge Estates  Commercial and additional uses will only destroy the potential  Country living close to town  Enhance the “Gateway to Naples”  Most desired residential acreage in Collier County  Ability for growth of environmental protection services  Addition of public services including parks and libraries with small, neighborhood commercial development to support local neighborhood V. Reading the newspaper in 10 years, what would the headline say about the Western Estates?  “One of the best places to retire with friendly people”  “Unique and faithful community that supports the integrity and charm of Naples”  “A great and convenient place to live”  “We are not a part of Golden Gate City”  “Local homeowners rejoice over being left alone”  “A pearl of beauty that truly complements Collier County”  “A wonderful residential community to live in”  “Commissioners gave in to their supporters and turned it into another Pine Ridge Road”  “This community stayed the same”  “Premier Estates living 3 miles from the beach”  “Beautiful corridor to the City of Naples”  “Excellent quiet location close to town provides solitude from busy work life”  Depends on how much “commercial” money changes hands with commissioners  “This master plan has not changed in 50 years. What a wonderful place”  Hardly anything- this area is quiet.  “Estate living still exists”  “Close to everything in town while maintaining privacy” Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 90 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 636 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) VI. What three things would really improve the future of the Western Estates?  Not amending the master plan  No commercial uses  Maintain privacy  Maintain traffic flow without addition of lights or stops  Enhance Golden Gate Parkway west of I-75 into a lush landscaped corridor serving as gateway to Naples  Uncouple the 4-block area from the GGAMP  Increase wall height for I-75 to reduce noise permeation  Enforce existing laws and ordinances  Small localized sub-neighborhoods with neighborhood commercial development that supports rural areas  Establish additional wildlife and environmental preservation areas  Provision of public services and access to schools, museums, parks, etc.  To never build a RaceTrac in our area  Create a name/identity for our neighborhood  Re-study traffic impacts of I-75 interchange  Consider traffic light at 66th Street SW  Water feature at SW corner of Golden Gate Pkwy and Livingston is a very welcome, positive feature  Sidewalks  Nature conservancy  Community gardens The workshop concluded at 8:35 p.m. Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 91 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 637 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Golden Gate Area Master Plan Golden Gate City - Introduction Public Workshop, June 8, 2016 Golden Gate Community Center Introduction: The Collier County Community Planning staff provided an introduction to the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) restudy, which will result in an update to the GGAMP. The purpose of the staff presentation was to identify the major components of the GGAMP, particularly as it pertains to Golden Gate City and environs. Emphasis was placed on major themes and the idea that visioning for the future should consider many factors as they contribute to the well-being of the next generation. The meeting was noticed and 3 electronic signboards were placed in collector roadways in the City for a period of three days. Approximately 25 people attended. Meeting Summary: Community Planning Manager Kris Van Lengen provided a PowerPoint presentation, and stated that this would be the first of several GGAMP meetings, and that this first meeting is in the nature of an introduction. Content included an overview of all area restudies, concepts currently embedded in the GGAMP, and finally a high level visioning exercise for the future of Golden Gate City. The presentation explained the interrelationships between studies and the timing of each. Discussion also included the process, identifying current plan provisions of importance to the community, identifying opportunities for improvement and incorporating the community’s vision and values to bring forward to the Board for its consideration. The role of the Growth Management Oversight Committee was also covered. The discussion on current GGAMP provisions began with an emphasis on website content and various opportunities for interaction and input and an overview of currently scheduled meetings, which will be rotational among Eastern Estates, Western Estates and Golden Gate City. A brief history described the major Restudy between 2001 and 2003 as well as the several private Growth Management Plan amendments that followed. Key features of the current GGAMP, as Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 92 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 638 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) pertain to Golden Gate City, were described under the 2 major portions of the GMP: Goals, Objectives and Policies, and Land Use Designations. Interpreting the current goals of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan as it relates to the Golden Gate City, an “existing vision” was derived and described as a recognition of distinct neighborhood areas within the City, the value of sub-area plans along with City-wide plans, consideration of a GG City Land Development Code, the importance of connections to the greater Naples area, and a reference to utilit y expansion. Various Land Use categories were described and discussed, most notably the Mixed -Use Activity Center, the Downtown Center Commercial Subdistrict and the Santa Barbara Commercial Subdistrict. The Golden Gate Parkway entryway into the City was also discussed. Questions and comments related to GMP and zoning overlays followed. Of note were comments related to the desire for a focal point within the Activity Center or nearby, roadway concerns and beautification. Principal Planner Anita Jenkins provided an interactive visioning session. She began by describing the nature and purpose of a community vision: what the community should look and feel like after implementation, as envisioned by residents. Key subject areas are land use, transportation, environment, economic and social activity and identity. After discussing the purpose, Ms. Jenkins challenged the audience to complete brief answers or descriptions to a number of visioning questions: How does Golden Gate City complement the County as a whole, what is it the best location for, what would you like to read in the newspaper about the area 10 years from now, what things would you suggest to improve the area? Consultants from AECOM also provided examples of streetscapes, walkability and City entryway features to stimulate imaginations. Overall, citizens seemed most interested in enhanced community facilities, infrastructure, and expression of art and culture native to the area. Specifically, a recommendation was made to extend the private utilities water to greater portions of the City (not wastewater), small business incubation, international food and arts locations, and the use of existing canals for recreation such as kayak and paddleboard. Individual slips were distributed throughout, and attendees wrote their visions in answer to these questions. A total of 35 questionnaires were returned. Below is a summ ary of questionnaire responses: I. Golden Gate City will be known for:  Cleanliness  Affordability  New Growth and Development  Celebrated Diversity  Safety Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 93 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 639 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) II. Golden Gate City will be a great location for:  Raising Families  Affordability  Community Services  Mobility  Recreation III. How does Golden Gate City complement Collier County?  Diversity  Center of Activity  Accessibility to workforce IV. What is the full potential for your community?  Unifying to accomplish goals  A place of flourishing families, business, and community services  Safe and effective for all modes of transit  A downtown destination V. Reading the newspaper in 10 years, what would the headline say about the Western Estates?  Clean safe and friendly with a lush landscape  Third fastest growing city in the state of Florida  Golden Gate notes first million-dollar home sale  A great place to raise a family  Number one most inviting community  Golden Gate wins state championships in sports, music, arts and more  More full-ride scholarships provided to residents per capita than anywhere in Florida  Community rallies to improve image  The remarkable turnaround and revitalization of Golden gate  The city that met the needs of its people VI. What three things would really improve the future of Golden Gate City?  Code enforcement  Safety of mobility (pedestrian, bicyclists)  Infrastructure  Creation of a CRA  Reduced public transit headways  Creation of a community trolley  Lighting  Preservation of green space  Increased homeownership Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 94 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 640 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Golden Gate Area Master Plan Golden Gate City Public Workshop, October 13, 2016 Golden Gate Community Center Introduction: The GGAMP Restudy- Golden Gate City Public Workshop was attended by several Golden Gate residents, county staff members, and local elected officials. The client team introduced the current GGAMP and presented a draft vision statement derived from the results of resident visioning questionnaires and surveys. Finally, an aud ience polling session was conducted to obtain attendee feedback. Meeting Summary: Attendees revised the draft vision statement to read: “Golden Gate City is a safe , diverse, family-oriented community that offers easy access to education, parks, shopping and services within a vibrant, walkable community.” Audience polling was conducted to obtain additional feedback in a manner that did not require attendees to self-identify with their answers or opinions in a group setting. Results of the audience polling are attached. Dialogue included: • active code enforcement day and night as opposed to the current complaint -driven code enforcement model • safety for all dimensions of Golden Gate City • additional lighting • limits to additional density • concern for the limited service area of potable water infrastructure and high costs associated with water infrastructure within existing service area o representatives of FGUA cited need to maintain and repair existing aging infrastructure prior to expanding service areas o understanding the importance of this discussion, the Golden Gate Civic Association offered to invite FGUA to a future civic association meeting where they could fo cus on the infrastructure concerns specifically • desire for additional distribution of commercial in the north area of Golden Gate City (Green Boulevard) Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 95 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 641 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) • support for enhanced and uniform development rules for commercial and mixed -use areas • additional entertainment and recreation options for young adults • support for citizen-driven planning efforts. Golden Gate City Workshop: 10/13/2016 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% Do you live in Golden Gate City No Yes 0%20%40%60%80%100% Which option best represents your relationship to Golden Gate City? Resident Business Owner Developer/ Representative Elected Official Other 0%20%40%60%80%100% How Satisfied are you with the locations of existing commercial uses in Golden Gate City? How satisfied are you with the potential locations of commercial uses in Golden Gate City?Very Unsatisfied Somewhat Unsatisfied Not Sure Somewhat Satisfied Very Satisfied Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 96 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 642 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 0%20%40%60%80%100% Do you support a more uniform set of development rules for commercial or mixed- use areas? Do you agree with existing policies about citizen-driven planning efforts? Would you volunteer one evening per month to serve on a planning committee? Do you have adequate health care resources in Golden Gate City? Do you think Golden Gate City should have its own unique standards for architecture or landscaping? No Not Sure Yes 0%20%40%60%80%100% What type of commercial use is most needed in Golden Gate City? Retail Personal Services Dining Offices Other 0%20%40%60%80%100% What type of institution is most needed in Golden Gate City? Government Services Places of Worship Adult and Child Care Centers Other Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 97 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 643 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 0%20%40%60%80%100% Should home-based businesses change in any way in Golden Gate City? Expanded Reduced Stay the Same Not Sure 0%20%40%60%80%100% How often do you walk to get somewhere in Golden Gate City? Never Monthly Weekly Daily 0%20%40%60%80%100% Do you have school-aged children that walk or ride bikes to school? No Yes I don't have children 0%20%40%60%80%100% Of the following options, what is your top priority for improvement in Golden Gate City? Street Lighting Traffic Calming Sidewalks Bike Routes/ Lanes Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 98 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 644 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 0%20%40%60%80%100% Have you ever used Collier Area Transit (CAT) service? No Yes 0%20%40%60%80%100% How satisfied are you with the current CAT routes? How satisfied are you with the current CAT service times and schedule? How satisfied are you with gateway design for Golden Gate City along Golden Gate Parkway? Very Unsatisfied Somewhat Unsatisfied Not Sure Somewhat Satisfied Very Satisfied Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 99 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 645 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Golden Gate Area Master Plan Golden Gate Western Estates Public Workshop, October 20, 2016 Golden Gate Community Center Introduction: The GGAMP Restudy-Golden Gate Western Estates Public Workshop was attended by several Western Estates residents, county staff members, local elected officials, as well as developers and their representatives. The client team introduced the current GGAMP. Greg Ault presented a draft vision statement derived from the results of resident visioning questionnaires and surveys. Finally, an audience polling session was conducted to obtain attendee feedback. Meeting Summary: Kris Van Lengen, Planning Manager, provided an overview of the Western Estates in the context of the entire GGAMP and the urban area of Collier County. He noted the Western estates is a little more than 10% of the area and population or the Eastern Estates, but is 86% developed compared to 47% in the East. Also discussed was the structure and content of the Master Plan. Permitted and conditional uses were reviewed, and the locational restrictions for conditional uses were presented. Attendees agree that the corridor along the south side of Immokalee Rd. should be unified under a designation allowing C-1 uses. The concept of additional CU locations at major intersections was presented, along with incentive-based lot combinations. Attendees revised the draft vision statement to include the terms “natural”, “large-lot/estate-lot”, “limited-commercial/non-commercial” to read: “Golden Gate Western Estates is a low-density large-lot residential neighborhood in a natural setting with convenient access to the coastal area.” Audience polling was conducted to obtain additional feedback in a manner that did not require attendees to self-identify with their answers or opinions in a group setting. Results of the audience polling are attached. Dialogue included: • requests for transparency in notifications of conditional uses • requests for information regarding future plans for county-owned parcel at Vanderbilt and Collier Blvd • outlook and vision for attendees with properties fronting major arterials as well as the I-75 interchange is very different than others Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 100 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 646 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) o higher noise levels o higher traffic o less desirable to residential buyers o the word “commercial” is undesirable, but residents need the services that commercial brings with it • desire to incorporate pedestrian/bike trails/passive recreation using creative thinking with limited R.O.W. • lack of traffic lights along Golden Gate Parkway makes left turns difficult during rush hours • existing Parks & Recreation facilities’ programming is at maximum capacity and unable to accommodate all desired users • call to resist external pressure to change or develop further • desire for more inclusive dialogue relating to areas outside of the Golden Gate Parkway corridor • strong opposition to any commercial uses • concern for poor or lack of cellular reception in the Western Estates • mixed support to allow rental of guest homes • strong support for incentivized voluntary small-lot combination program • desire for the recognition of smaller “sub-areas” that comprise Western Estates Golden Gate Western Estates Workshop: 10/20/2016 0%20%40%60%80%100% Do you live in Golden Gate Western Estates?No Yes Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 101 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 647 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 0%20%40%60%80%100% How long have you lived in Golden Gate Western Estates? Less than 1 Year 1>5 Years 5>10 Years 10>20 Years Over 20 Years I don't live in GG City 0%20%40%60%80%100% Which option best represents your relationship to Golden Gate Western Estates? Resident Business Owner Developer/ Representative Elected Official Other 0%20%40%60%80%100% What type of commercial use is most needed in the Western Estates? Retail Personal Services Dining Offices Other 0%20%40%60%80%100% Should home-based businesses change in any way in the Western Estates? Reduced Stay the Same Not Sure Expanded Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 102 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 648 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 0%20%40%60%80%100% How satisfied are you with the locations of existing commercial uses in or near the Western Estates? How satisfied are you with the availability and locations of social organizations in or near the Western Estates? How satisfied are you with the availability and locations of child care and adult day care in or near the Western Estates? How satisfied are you with the availability and locations of religious institutions in or near the Western Estates? How satisfied are you with cellular reception/service in or near the Western Estates? How satisfied are you with the availability and locations of group housing options for seniors or persons with special needs in or near the Western Estates? How satisfied are you with the availability and locations of assisted living facilities and nursing homes in or near the Western Estates? How satisfied are you with the neighborhood identity for the Western Estates? Very Unsatisfied Somewhat Unsatisfied Not Sure Somewhat Satisfied Very Satisfied Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 103 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 649 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 0%20%40%60%80%100% Do you support office uses at major intersections? Do you support conditional uses at major intersections? Do you support conditional uses at any other locations not currently allowed? Would you support office or conditional uses along Immokalee Road? Would you support an Interchange Activity Center at the intersection of Golden Gate Parkway and I-75? Should there be a change to allow rental of your guest house? Should there be a change to allow rental of your guest house? (Do-over) Would you be in favor of a voluntary "small lot combination" incentive program? Would you volunteer one evening per month to serve on a planning committee for the Golden Gate Area? Do you agree that raising livestock and crops should be allowed in the Urban Estates? Do you have adequate access to neighborhood parks in or near the Western Estates? Do you have adequate access to public spaces in or near the Western Estates? Do you have adequate access to ped/bike trail system in or near the Western Estates? No Not Sure Yes Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 104 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 650 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 0%20%40%60%80%100% Would you consider a voluntary association for the Western Estates? No Not Sure Yes, sub-areas Yes , as a whole 0%20%40%60%80%100% How often do you walk to another destination? Never Monthly Weekly Daily 0%20%40%60%80%100% How do your school-aged children get to school? Bus Car Bike or Walk I don't have school-aged children 0%20%40%60%80%100% How do you feel about existing public street lighting in the Western Estates? Not Enough Light Perfect Amount Too Much Light Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 105 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 651 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 0%20%40%60%80%100% Of the following options, what is your top priority for improvement in the Western Estates? Street Lighting Traffic Calming Sidewalks Bike/Ped Trail System Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 106 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 652 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Golden Gate Area Master Plan Golden Gate Eastern Estates Public Workshop, November 3, 2016 UIFAS Center Introduction: The GGAMP Restudy-Golden Gate Eastern Estates Public Workshop was well-attended by approximately 130 Eastern Estates residents, stakeholders, and county staff members. The client team introduced the current GGAMP and presented a draft vision statement that was produced as a result of resident visioning questionnaires and surveys. An audience polling session was then conducted to obtain additional feedback. Meeting Summary: Kris Van Lengen, Planning Manager, provided an overview on the Master Planning process, demographics of the area, existing public facilities, existing approved GMP locations for Neighborhood Centers and conditional uses, and coordination with the RFMUD restudy in providing nearby opportunities for retail, service and jobs for Estates residents. Transportation study areas were discussed as were watershed and other environmental topics. The following draft vision statement was presented to workshop attendees: “The Golden Gate Eastern Estates is an interconnected, low-density residential community with limited goods and services in neighborhood centers, defined by a rural character with an appreciation for nature and quiet surroundings.” Upon presenting the draft vision statement, attendees were asked to provide feedback and potential revisions. Responses included the following terms and subject areas: • No interference • Nature/natural/environment/park/recreation Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 107 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 653 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) • Family-oriented • Health and safety • Code enforcement • Rural/country-living • Protection of natural character • Desire for services including: postal, medical, governmental, community and recreation • Access to retail goods and personal services • Desire to change the wording “limited” presented within the draft • Acknowledgment of watershed/sheetflow • Sidewalks, bus stops, and refuge for school-aged children Audience polling was conducted to obtain additional feedback in a manner that did not require attendees to self-identify with their answers or opinions in a group setting. Results of the audience polling session are attached. Additionally, attendees were encouraged to provide additional comments and feedback using written comment cards. Dialogue and comments received during and after the polling session included: • desire to preserve foliage on properties and only clearing necessary areas for wildfire protection • concern for the high volume of heavy equipment operating within and traveling through the Eastern Estates • mixed support for additional conditional uses including churches and assisted living facilities general satisfaction with availability/locations of social organizations mixed satisfaction with availability/locations of child care/adult day care, religious institutions, group housing options, assisted living facilities, general dissatisfaction with cellular reception/service • desire for roadway expansion and additional connectivity to the west • mixed support for additional commercial land designations, with general support for small shopping centers as opposed to large centers • call for effective code enforcement • desire for equestrian and other recreational trail networks Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 108 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 654 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) • request to prohibit fireworks and pyrotechnics in an effort to protect wildlife and prevent wildfires • requests for improved drainage • strong support for an I-75 interchange in the vicinity of Everglades Boulevard • general support for industrial areas or business parks to provide jobs and support trade near to the Eastern Estates • strong support for non-residential architectural standards specific to the Eastern Estates • support to allow rental of guest houses • overwhelming support for an incentivized small-lot combination program • general support for an incentivized transfer of ownership program Golden Gate Eastern Estates Workshop: Instant Polling Results, 11/03/2016 0%20%40%60%80%100% Do you live in Golden Gate Eastern Estates?No Yes 0%20%40%60%80%100% How long have you lived in Golden Gate Eastern Estates? Less than 1 Year 1>5 Years 5>10 Years 10>20 Years Over 20 Years I don't live in GG City Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 109 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 655 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) (This space intentionally left blank.) 80%85%90%95%100% Which option best represents your relationship to Golden Gate Eastern Estates? Resident Business Owner Developer/ Representative Elected Official Other Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 110 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 656 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 0%20%40%60%80%100% How satisfied are you with the locations of existing commercial uses in or near the Eastern Estates? How satisfied are you with the potential locations of commercial uses in or near the Eastern Estates? How satisfied are you with the availability and locations of social organizations in or near the Eastern Estates? How satisfied are you with the availability and locations of child care and adult day care in or near the Eastern Estates? How satisfied are you with the availability and locations of religious institutions in or near the Eastern Estates? How satisfied are you with cellular reception/service in or near the Eastern Estates? How satisfied are you with the availability and locations of group housing options for seniors or persons with special needs in or near the Eastern Estates? How satisfied are you with the availability and locations of assisted living facilities and nursing homes in or near the Eastern Estates? Very Unsatisfied Somewhat Unsatisfied Not Sure Somewhat Satisfied Very Satisfied Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 111 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 657 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) (This space intentionally left blank.) 0%20%40%60%80%100% What type of commercial use is most needed in the Eastern Estates? Retail Personal Services Dining Offices Other Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 112 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 658 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 0%20%40%60%80%100% Should there be a larger commercial center central to the Eastern Estates? Should there be more neighborhood commercial centers throughout the Eastern Estates? Do you want specific architectural standards for non-residential uses in the Eastern Estates? Should there be a change to allow rental of your guest house? Would you use a Transit Park & Ride or Ride Sharing Facility? Do you support an I-75 connection in the vicinity of Everglades Boulevard? Watershed Concept 1: Would you support an incentive to owners who wish to combine a 1.14-acre lot with an adjoining lot? Watershed Concept 2: Would you support a voluntary transfer of ownership program for undeveloped parcels identified by a watershed committee? Should there be usable public spaces in the Eastern Estates? Should there be trails and greenways in the Eastern Estates? No Not Sure Yes Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 113 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 659 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 0%20%40%60%80%100% Is there a need for an industrial area or business park to provide jobs and support trade in or near the Eastern Estates? No Not Sure Yes, nearby- not in Yes, in the Estates 0%20%40%60%80%100% Should home-based businesses change in any way in the Eastern Estates? Reduced Stay the same Not Sure Expanded 0%20%40%60%80%100% Should potential Conditional Use applications change in any way in the Eastern Estates? Allow everywhere Allow along arterials Only at select locations Only certain kinds at additional locations They should not change Not Sure Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 114 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 660 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Golden Gate City Commercial Property Owners Meeting February 16, 2017 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Introduction: To better understand the Golden Gate City commercial properties opportunities and constraints, a public workshop was scheduled specifically for these property owners. Staff mailed a meeting notice to all owners of record with property designated existing o r future commercial use. The meeting was well-attended by approximately 60 property owners, various county department staff members, the Chamber of Commerce, Economic Development staff, and County Commissioner Burt Saunders. Meeting Summary: Kris Van Lengen, Planning Manager, provided an overview of the Master Plan restudy process. Anita Jenkins, Principle Planner, discussed the previous Golden Gate City public workshops and specifically the vision statement the Golden Gate residents drafted for their community. Staff described the different commercial land use districts within Golden Gate City and how it these districts applied to their property. To invite discussion related to improvements that could be made to the Master Plan, staff asked questions related to future plans for commercial properties, and what obstacles in redevelopment had been identified. Property owner’s provided the following comments: ▪ Wants to redevelop within the next five years (Santa Barbara district) to do medical. o Problem is traffic safety concerns along Santa Barbara, o LDC requires project minimum of 1 acre rather than 1 parcel. Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 115 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 661 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) o It would be helpful if the rezoning to commercial happened because properties are being advertised as residential rather than commercial. o Would like to build more duplex or triplex; city water is not available but would like it to be. o Thinks septic is a good optional because of the cost to install central sewage • Development standard and setbacks need to be amended to accommodate change from residential to commercial. • Plan for affordable housing in the in the residential area in the Golden Gate City. o When rezoning property it was discussed how to capture pass by traffic to be viable commercial. What happens to the displaced people when switching from residential to commercial? o Vertical mixed-use was discussed and identified as an option to maintain residences within commercial properties. • Golden gate parkway discussion that nobody is required to redevelopment the property. Can it be kept as residential if the owner does not live in it? Big concern so that owners can keep property regardless of who lives there. • Concerns about too many parcels changing from residential to commercial which will entail to pushing out those who want to stay residential. • If a CRA what percent would go into the pool? o It varies as the property values increase. Sliding scale based on the value of the property. • How many properties would have to agree to transfer from residential to commercial in Golden Gate section. o Mike Bosi, Zoning Director, discussed possible restrictions for creating a PUD. Parcel number would vary based on the LDC codes such as parking and square footage. • Traffic control to protect residents if conversation rate increased. • Would like more cafés and restaurants in Golden Gate City. Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 116 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 662 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) • Realtor participating in the meeting provided perspective that if a community is more mixed-use the property values will increase • Promote remodeling without putting restrictions, better to let the owner based their remodels based off being grandfathered in rather than having to meet current LDC codes. • Discussion how the Greater Naples Chamber of Commerce can help Golden Gate City by promoting pad ready sites on their website. • Commissioner Saunder’s provided concluding remarks encouraging redevelopment of the Golden Gate City commercial areas and mentioned the potential for utility conversion and state funding to help off-set costs. Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 117 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 663 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Golden Gate Area Master Plan Golden Gate Eastern Estates Public Workshop, February 22, 2017 UIFAS Center Introduction: The GGAMP Restudy-Golden Gate Eastern Estates Initial Recommendations Public Workshop was attended by approximately 31 Eastern Estates stakeholders, and county staff members. The client team introduced the current GGAMP and presented a revised vision statement that was produced as a result of resident visioning questionnaires and surveys. An audience polling session was then conducted to obtain level of support for existing and newly recommended GGAMP policies specific to the Eastern Estates. Meeting Summary: Kris Van Lengen, Planning Manager, presented information on the status of the restudy, prior meetings, area demographics and key topic areas. Anita Jenkins, Principal Planner, presented results of visioning from prior meetings, including the community’s consensus on its distinctive qualities. Audience polling was conducted to obtain level of support for potential new policies and existing policies in a manner that did not require attendees to self-identify with their answers or opinions in a group setting. Results of the audience polling session are attached. Additionally, stakeholders were encouraged to provide comments and feedback through written comment cards and group dialogue. Dialogue and comments received during and af ter the polling session included: • Conditional Uses at arterial intersections o Desire to preserve arterial intersections for potential future commercial as opposed to conditional uses since they are the most desirable to commercial property developers. o Need for larger conditional use parcels to be compatible with the surrounding community. • Transportation and mobility o Desire for an increased rate of road paving. o Concern for increased congestion on Everglades Blvd with a potential I-75 interchange. o Increased need for designated refuge/waiting areas for students waiting for school buses. Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 118 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 664 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) o Desire for the interchange to be aligned with RFMUD receiving areas due to future increased population densities. o Concern for the future character of streets adjacent to a potential interchange. o Desire to limit access to or from the interchange. • Desire for larger buffers and setbacks for non-residential uses. • Need for appropriate lighting at rural intersections, without over-lighting entire corridors. • Need for reflective street signage and way finding o Strong concern for an increase of built guest homes and the overall effects on the community and population density if a policy were changed to allow for the lease of guest homes as well as adverse impacts on infrastructure, watershed, and code enforcement. o Desire to make senior centers and wellness centers a conditional use. Golden Gate Eastern Estates Workshop – Instant Polling Results: 02/22/2017 0%20%40%60%80%100% Which option best represents your relationship to Golden Gate Eastern Estates? Resident Business Owner Developer/ Representative Elected Official Other 0%20%40%60%80%100% Do you live in Golden Gate Eastern Estates?No Yes Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 119 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 665 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) (This space intentionally left blank.) 0%20%40%60%80%100% How long have you lived in Golden Gate Eastern Estates? How long have you lived in Golden Gate Eastern Estates? (do-over) Less than 1 Year 1>5 Years 5>10 Years 10>20 Years Over 20 Years I don't live in GG City Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 120 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 666 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 0%20%40%60%80%100% Retain existing policy allowing for livestock and crops. Retain existing policy to preserve the rural character of the Eastern Estates. Add new provision to allow Conditional Uses at arterial intersections. Add new provision to allow Conditional Uses at arterial intersections. (do-over) Add new provision to allow Group Homes (7-14 people). Add new provision to allow communications towers. Accommodate growing demand for employment, goods, services, and entertainment with provisions adjacent to the Estates. Neighborhood centers may be increased in size to accommodate stormwater, septic and buffer requirements. The County will develop rural architectural standards for commercial and institutional development in the Estates. Retain existing policy to pave lime rock roads. Strongly Disagree Somewhat Disagree Not Sure Somewhat Agree Strongly Agree Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 121 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 667 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 0%20%40%60%80%100% Retain existing policy to schedule (or update) and fund bridge improvements. Retain existing policy to create a greenway plan. Retain existing policy to increase north- south and east-west route alternatives. Retain existing policy to coordinate a future I-75 interchange in the vicinity of Everglades Boulevard. The County will update setback and buffer standards for non-residential uses in the Estates and for adjoining uses in the RFMUD and RLSA. Retain existing policy to conduct wildfire mitigation education and prevention programs. Retain existing policy that the County will consider incentives for wetland preservation. Retain existing policy that the County will encourage "dark sky" lighting standards. The County will promote the combination of 1.14-acre or similar "small lots" into adjoining lots through incentives The County will consider a TDR program for natural resource protection. Strongly Disagree Somewhat Disagree Not Sure Somewhat Agree Strongly Agree Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 122 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 668 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 0%20%40%60%80%100% The County will consider dispersed water storage and watershed connectivity to, through, and from the Estates. The County will continue efforts to support independent fire districts and Florida Forestry Service in public education, planning, and resourcing related to wildfire prevention and response. The County shall continue to work toward the goal of providing a septic disposal facility located in Collier County. The County will create new lighting standards within the LDC. Do you support the ability of owners to rent/lease their guest homes. Strongly Disagree Somewhat Disagree Not Sure Somewhat Agree Strongly Agree Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 123 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 669 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Golden Gate Area Master Plan Golden Gate City Public Workshop, April 26, 2017 Golden Gate Community Center Introduction: The GGAMP Restudy Golden Gate City Initial Recommendations Public Workshop was attended by approximately 10 Golden Gate City stakeholders, and county staff members. The county staff introduced the current GGAMP and public outreach to-date. An audience polling session was then conducted by the client team to obtain level of support for existing and newly recommended GGAMP policies specific to Golden Gate City. Areas of focus included complementary land uses, economic vitality, transportation and mobility, and environment. Meeting Summary Audience polling was conducted to obtain consensus for potential new policies and existing policies in a manner that did not require attendees to self-identify with their answers or opinions in a group setting. Additionally, stakeholders were encouraged to provide comments and feedback through group dialogue. Dialogue during and after the polling session included: • Code Enforcement ─ While discussing the information on page 10 of the PowerPoint, some of the attendees recommended that code enforcement be added as an additional “focus” idea. Some of the attendees were concerned with the way that environmental code – such as the removal of invasive trees – is enforced. • Architectural Review ─ Some of the attendees voiced that they would like to establish a review board to oversee architectural standards. • Stormwater improvements. ─ After the conclusion of the meeting, there was discussion of opportunities in future construction for stormwater systems improvements. Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 124 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 670 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Golden Gate City Workshop – Initial Recommendations: 04/26/2017 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% Do you live in Golden Gate City?No Yes 0%20%40%60%80%100% How long have you lived in Golden Gate City? Less than 1 Year 1>5 Years 5>10 Years 10>20 Years Over 20 Years I don't live in GG City 0%20%40%60%80%100% Which option best represents your relationship to Golden Gate City? Resident Business Owner Developer/ Representative Elected Official Other Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 125 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 671 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 0%20%40%60%80%100% Commercial sub-districts should be simpler and more cohesive, emphasizing mixed-use and supporting redevelopment opportunities. (do-over) Mixed-use provisions and Land Development Code standards should strive for uniformity The County should consider one or more zoning overlay(s) to reduce the cost and complexity of individual rezone petitions. Consider provision in zoning overlay to allow property improvements even if not to some of today's development standards (ex: parking, landscape, setback, etc.) Downtown Center Commercial Subdistrict: Remove prohibition on rental housing. Downtown Center Commercial Subdistrict: Promote mixed-use standards, including vertical mixed-use. Santa Barbara Commercial Subdistrict: Remove prohibition on rental housing. Santa Barbara Commercial Subdistrict: Promote mixed-use standards, including vertical mixed-use. Santa Barbara Commercial Subdistrict: Remove 1-acre rezone requirement. Golden Gate Professional Office Subdistrict: Promote mixed-use standards, including vertical mixed-use. Disagree No Opinion Agree Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 126 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 672 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 0%20%40%60%80%100% Golden Gate Professional Office Subdistrict: Expand uses to C-3 (commercial) and residential. Golden Gate Professional Office Subdistrict: Increase height to allow 3 stories adjacent to Golden Gate Parkway. Mixed Use Activity Center Subdistrict: Should the boundaries of the Subdistrict be expanded? Collier Boulevard Commercial Sub-District: Do you agree with the uses within this Subdistrict? Collier Boulevard Commercial Sub-District: Should certain light industrial uses be allowed if adding jobs to GG City? Enhance community participation in area and sub-area planning through a county- fostered initiative with the ultimate goal of self-sustained community planning. Enhance community cultural assets, international focus, and community identity. Adopt appropriate tools for business enhancement, such as incubators or accelorators. Explore feasibility of CRA, Business Improvement District (BID), or Innovation Zone within Golden Gate City. Downtown Center Commercial Subdistrict: Retain Plan language related to pedestrian connectivity and alternative modes of transportation. Disagree No Opinion Agree Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 127 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 673 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 0%20%40%60%80%100% Identify and prioritize traffic-calming locations. Express need to conduct a pedestrian bridge connectivity study over canals. Study potential for utility service conversion from Florida Government Utility Authority to Collier County Water Sewer District. Continue canal/outfall water monitoring for surface and groundwater contamination as it relates to septic. Seek appropriate grant funding opportunities for conversion of septic to sewer service. Continue stormwater outfall and connectivity improvements for flood control. Develop a program requiring removal of all exotic vegetation using Golden Gate City as a pilot. Disagree No Opinion Agree Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 128 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 674 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 0%20%40%60%80%100% Mixed Use Activity Center Subdistrict: Should the Uses include "light industrial" if compatible with neighborhood? No No Opinion Yes Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 129 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 675 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Correspondence Regarding Golden Gate City Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 130 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 676 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Office of Business and Economic Development Research Memo: (April 18, 2017) Golden Gate Area Master-Plan (GGAMP)1 Overview: Collier County’s Economic Development is inclusive of Golden Gate City particularly with respect to retail and commercial business. However, various sources reveal that there is limited Industrial land which has been retarding the County’s capabilities for investment attraction and expansion 2. This update provides a great opportunity to create an environment to bring more development to the area covered by the Golden Gate Area Master-Plan (GGAMP). Big Boxes are increasingly becoming vacant big–box stores i.e. ‘dark boxes’3 at a time when the GGAMP remains heavily focused on Commercial use. Commercial Zoning is defined by Florida statutes4, to include activities predominantly connected with the sale, rental and distribution of products or performance of services while industrial-use means activities connected with manufacturing, assembly, processing, or storage of products. Industrial-use facilitates greater value-added activities associated with improved jobs and wages, while lower value-added investments usually promoted by commercial use activity, are generally subject to greater job termination, and this seems the opposite of the vision for the GGAMP. Industrial areas would indeed serve as a major economic boost for the county and in the Golden Gate area. However, industrial zoning would require buffers and other ways to separate business use from the residential areas. Heavy industrial-use has been associated with negative community impacts including environmental pollution. Proposing Mixed-use, or allowing certain light-industrial 5 uses as a conditional-use would be a great way to update the GGAMP. Conditional-use would allow for county staff to review and ensure that each proposed use will not negatively impact the surrounding neighborhoods. The main objectives for Golden Gate City could be further promoted and facilitated where the GGAMP includes mixed use and conditional use zoning that promotes light-industrial-uses and business parks in Goals 4 and 5 of the plan. This could also enable greater investments in some of Golden Gate City’s currently unused and underutilized ‘big-box’ spaces e.g. Sweet Bay, Sears and K-Mart. Points: • The 44 respondents included in the GGAMP survey 6 indicated they wanted Golden Gate City to: o facilitate new business as a top priority for improving Golden Gate City’s future; 1 http://www.colliergov.net/home/showdocument?id=66933 2 http://www.colliergov.net/home/showdocument?id=764 3 http://ilsr.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/bbtk-factsheet-blight.pdf 4 https://floridaldr.files.wordpress.com/2011/01/relevant-florida-statutes-definitions.pdf 5 Light or limited industrial zoning is intended for lands appropriate for low-intensity, light and medium industrial activities. Typical uses include assembly and fabrication industries, warehousing, distribution centers, administrative offices, and business support services that typically do not cause noise, air, or water disturbances or pollution. (see http://www.codepublishing.com/CA/Fairfield/html/Fairfield25/Fairfield2506.html retrieved April 18, 2017. 6 https://docs.google.com/forms/d/17Yols-i6vU-QMxD6RLNvPoW6NbkZFNfjwGJzBWWRgBo/viewanalytics Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 131 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 677 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Office of Business and Economic Development o be distinctive for middle-class workers and new growth; o be a premier location for investment; • The Office of Business and Economic Development(OBED) reviewed the GGAMP and encourages more mixed or conditional-use zoning that promotes light-industrial activities and business parks. Goals 4 and 5 could be revised to include specific reference to advanced manufacturing, including automated apparel, light assembly and 3D printing, as well as call centers. • Several large retailers, including Payless, K-Mart, Sweet Bay and Sears are closing a significant number of stores in Collier County. That provides an opportunity for timely amendment to the Land Development Code (LDC) development standards and permitted uses that could help to bring new businesses to the area. For example, Sears in Chicago has repurposed a 127,000 square-foot store into a multitenant data center 7. This could be replicated in Golden Gate City if developers were allowed the proposed flexibility in development standards. Currently, there is vacant commercial and retail space, and a revision to the LDC to include mixed or conditional-use developments that promote light- industrial activities and business parks could help to meet resident’s needs. Throughout the nation, transforming plaza districts to mixed-use developments is a growing trend (see http://newsok.com/article/5545159 and http://mixeduse.sochaplazas.com/work/ ). Revising the GGAMP to allow such transitions could help improve the area’s economic competitiveness. Some tracts within Golden Gate Area are designated as Historically Underutilized Business (HUB) Zones and mixed-or conditional-use could aid in their development. Action: OBED to- • coordinate with Zoning Division, GGCRA-MSTU and other affected parties at meetings prior to the public workshops this summer to work on discussions and drafting considerations for incorporating greater mixed-and conditional-uses that promotes light- industrial use and business park activities in Goals 4 and 5 of the GGAMP; and • participate in the GGAMP Public Workshops. 7 http://www.triplepundit.com/2013/06/former-sears-kmart-stores-become-data-centers/ Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 132 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 678 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 1 From:Michael Currier <mcurrier@govmserv.com> Sent:Monday, October 17, 2016 11:10 AM To:VanLengenKris Cc:Donna Lizotte; Ron Jefferson; JenkinsAnita Subject:RE: Golden Gate City and FGUA Attachments:GG-MAP SERVICE AREA-W & WW-UPDATED_2011.pdf Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Flagged Kris: I am not aware of FGUA sponsored line extensions since purchase in 1999. The most recent line extensions were constructed and paid by development; Publix on CR 951 and Collier schools. From: VanLengenKris [mailto:KrisVanLengen@colliergov.net] Sent: Friday, October 14, 2016 11:29 AM To: Michael Currier Cc: Donna Lizotte; Ron Jefferson; JenkinsAnita Subject: Golden Gate City and FGUA Hello Michael: Many thanks to you and Donna for attending the Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy public workshop last evening. I appreciate that you shared maps of your served area for water and wastewater service in Golden Gate City. I have two follow-up requests: 1. Can you provide those maps in PDF format so that the detail and color is more evident? 2. Can you share any examples of extending service to new street areas and how it worked out? For example, number of new residences included, cost per customer for impact fee and connection charge, etc.? Have you made any new connections in the past 10-20 years either in GG City or in your Service area just west in GG Estates? Thanks for helping us understand the underlying issues and business plans of FGUA, and thanks too for planning to meet again with residents at an upcoming Golden Gate Civic Association meeting. Respectfully, Kris Van Lengen, JD, AICP Community Planning Manager Zoning Division, Collier County 2800 N. Horseshoe Dr. Naples, FL 34104 (239) 252-7268 www.colliergov.net/GMPrestudies Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 133 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 679 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 1 From:DelateJoseph Sent:Friday, October 07, 2016 1:00 PM To:MoscaMichele Cc:JenkinsAnita; VanLengenKris Subject:RE: GG City improvements Attachments:GoldenGateCityStormwaterDrainageSystemImprovementPlan_CurrentConditions_2016.pdf; Golden Gate City Stormwater Drainage Improvement Project_NE1.pdf; Golden Gate City Stormwater Drainage Improvement Project_NW1.pdf; Golden Gate City Stormwater Drainage Improvement Project_SE1.pdf; Golden Gate City Stormwater Drainage Improvement Project_SW1.pdf Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Flagged This is a multi- year project that may take 20 years from start to finish. It is a maintenance project to replace the stormwater pipes and catch basins (stormwater inlets) in the 4 square mile GG City only. There are no ponds or new improvements planned. The total estimated construction cost is $15M in 2012 dollars. This amount obviously will be higher by the time is fully constructed due to inflation, construction cost increases, etc… The design costs are approximately 15-20% so that would add an approximate $3M to the 2012 total. Funding will be in small amounts as it is available and budgeted on a yearly basis. The County has requested a $1M FLA legislative earmark for this upcoming session but that is only a possibility of receiving funding. Attached are maps of the 4 Quads plus a relatively recent current conditions map that is mostly up to date. As a side note, we like to call it stormwater management, not drainage or flood control, even though the graphics say otherwise. Thank you. From: MoscaMichele Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2016 2:04 PM To: DelateJoseph Cc: JenkinsAnita; VanLengenKris Subject: RE: GG City improvements Hi Joe, The County’s Community Planning staff would like information about the stormwater improvements slated for Golden Gate City (refer to below email). I provided them with the below excerpt/information from a recent presentation given by Jerry. In addition, the 2016 AUIR identifies funding for the project in fiscal years 2018, 2019, 2020 and 2021 for “DC” – design, permitting, and construction. GG City Outfall Replacements Proposed Funding in FY 17: $500,000 Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 134 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 680 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 2 Four-square-mile area of Golden Gate City Replacement and improvements to existing aging infrastructure: Replaced old catch basins with ditch bottom inlets with grates Installation of sumps at catch basins Re-grading and sodding of swales to prevent erosion When you have a moment, would you please provide Kris with the requested map(s) or graphics and any other pertinent project details. Thank you, Michele Michele R. Mosca, AICP Principal Planner Growth Management Department Capital Project Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management Division 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Naples, FL 34104 tel. 239.252.2466 From: VanLengenKris Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2016 11:40 AM To: MoscaMichele Cc: JenkinsAnita Subject: GG City improvements Hi Michelle: You mentioned the outfall replacement project for GG City stormwater, ($.5m, FY 17). Do you have a map of the improvement locations, or graphics from studies to show improvement areas in flood control for certain blocks? Also, are there any other future stormwater improvements in the next 5-10 years? Thanks, Kris Van Lengen, JD, AICP Community Planning Manager Zoning Division, Collier County 2800 N. Horseshoe Dr. Naples, FL 34104 (239) 252-7268 www.colliergov.net/GMPrestudies Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 135 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 681 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 1 From:VanLengenKris Sent:Thursday, February 02, 2017 3:08 PM To:'Sandra Mediavilla' Cc:JenkinsAnita Subject:RE: Golden Gate Area Master Plan Attachments:text GGAMP City Downtown Center Comm Sub.pdf; FLUM Downtown Commercial Subdistrict.pdf Hello Sandy: Thank you for your inquiry. I am attaching language and a reference map currently contained in our Comprehensive Plan within the Golden Gate Area Master Plan section. This material dates back to 2004. The Subdistrict containing your address is called Downtown Center Commercial Subdistrict. We are in the process of a “restudy”, which means we want to obtain public comments and make changes reflecting public consensus and changed conditions. The area shaded on the map indicates one of many Subdistricts that was identified more than 10 years ago for redevelopment. You can read the language describing the intent. The Future Land Use (FLU) designation is a bit different than zoning. I believe your property is zoned residential. Nevertheless, the FLU would give a property owner the right to request a zoning change, subject to compatibility with surrounding areas and other considerations. As you will be unable to attend the meeting, please feel free to let me know whether you agree with this designation. I infer from your comments that you would prefer that addresses along 23d Ave SW not be a part of this FLU designation. Please feel free to confirm or expand. We will provide written comments to the hearing bodies after we assemble initial recommendations for change. Meanwhile, please feel free to contact me with further questions and comments. Very truly yours, Kris Van Lengen, JD, AICP Community Planning Manager Zoning Division, Collier County 2800 N. Horseshoe Dr. Naples, FL 34104 (239) 252-7268 www.colliergov.net/GMPrestudies From: Sandra Mediavilla [mailto:SandraMediavilla@napleslaw.us] Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2017 2:04 PM To: VanLengenKris <KrisVanLengen@colliergov.net> Subject: Golden Gate Area Master Plan Kris: I am a property owner within the City area of Golden Gate. I received your letter yesterday regarding the GGAMP and informing me of the meeting to be held on February 16, 2017 at 5:30 pm. Unfortunately, I work until 5:30 therefore will not be able to attend the meeting. But let this email serve as my comments on the information contained in your letter. Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 136 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 682 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 2 Your letter indicates that my property (which is clearly residential) is “allowed to have commercial uses”. I am hopeful you are not referring to the residential portion of Golden Gate City. I live at 4340 23rd Ave. SW. I have owned the house and resided in the house since 1976. While the entire area and population of Golden Gate City has greatly changed over my 41 years in the area, I cannot and will never agree to this residential area becoming in any way commercial. I am hopeful that when you refer to “commercial property owners”, you are referring to those areas of the City which are already commercial in nature, i.e. 951, the Parkway, Santa Barbara Blvd. etc. I cannot imagine that any portion of the residential areas of the City of Golden Gate would be deemed or somehow turned into a commercial area. As it is now, I live in an area which is now filled with people who are not of the nature as when I first moved into this neighborhood. If I were able to afford it, I would remove myself from this area to an area more to my liking. If this is not the case, please let me know and I will see if I can get the time off to attend your meeting in person. I look forward to hearing back from your office. Thank you. Sandy Sandra B. Mediavilla Florida Registered Paralegal Parrish, White & Yarnell, P. A. 3431 Pine Ridge Road, Suite 101 Naples, FL 34109 Phone: 239-566-2013 Fax: 239-566-9561 E-mail: SandraMediavilla@napleslaw.us Both Sandra Mediavilla and Parrish, White & Yarnell, P.A. intend that this message be used exclusively by the addressee(s). This message may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Unauthorized disclosure or use of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please permanently dispose of the original message and notify Sandra Mediavilla immediately at (239) 566-2013. Thank you. Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 137 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 683 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 138 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 684 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Correspondence Regarding Eastern Golden Gate Estates Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 139 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 685 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 1 From:MottToni Sent:Friday, April 01, 2016 5:28 PM To:VanLengenKris Cc:DowlingMichael Subject:1983 Agreement - GAC Land Trust Attachments:1983 Agreement.pdf; Reserved and Available List with Folio 2016.xlsx Follow Up Flag:Flag for follow up Flag Status:Flagged Hi Kris, Sorry I missed your call. Please find attached the 1983 Agreement between Avatar Properties Inc, f/k/a GAC Properties Inc. and Collier County. Michael Dowling is the liaison with the Golden Gate Land Trust Committee. Also attached is the list of remaining properties. I’ll be out of the office next week Monday through Wednesday and perhaps we can meet and discuss and questions you may have after that. Just let us know. Thanks Toni A. Mott Toni A. Mott, Manager, SR/WA Collier County Real Property Management 3335 Tamiami Trail East - Suite 101 Naples, FL 34112 Telephone Number: 239-252-8780 Fax Number: 230-252-8876 Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 140 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 686 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper12/19/2017 Page 141 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 687 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper12/19/2017 Page 142 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 688 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper12/19/2017 Page 143 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 689 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper12/19/2017 Page 144 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 690 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper12/19/2017 Page 145 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 691 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper12/19/2017 Page 146 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 692 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper12/19/2017 Page 147 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 693 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper12/19/2017 Page 148 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 694 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper12/19/2017 Page 149 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 695 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper12/19/2017 Page 150 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 696 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper12/19/2017 Page 151 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 697 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper12/19/2017 Page 152 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 698 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper12/19/2017 Page 153 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 699 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper12/19/2017 Page 154 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 700 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 A B C D E F G H I J March 29, 2016 GAC Land Sales PHASE UNIT TRACT LEGAL ACRES OR BK/PG RESERVED FOR PER ACRE APPRAISED VALUE FOLIO NUMBER I 7 81 All of Tract 81 9.11 1257/794 Parks and Recreation (3 - 2016)$50,000 $455,500 36915200008 I 20 2 All of Tract 2 8.78 1257/794 School Board $40,000 $350,800 37590080008 I 195 85 All of Tract 85 4.77 1257/794 School Board $38,000 $181,260 45967400009 I 95 53 W 180 3.92 1257/794 School Board (3 - 2016)$60,000 $235,200 41824360008 I 96 121 All of Tract 121 4.52 1257/794 School Board (3 - 2016)$60,000 $271,200 41887560007 III 67A 110 All of Tract 110 1.49 1361/2029 North Naples Fire and Rescue $9,000 $13,410 40120440005 II 93 48 W105/W180 1.17 1361/2019 Greater Naples Fire and Rescue $10,000 $15,900 41714000009 II 93 48 E75/W180 1.14 1361/2019 Greater Naples Fire and Rescue $10,000 $11,400 41713880000 I 14 127 All of Tract 127 5.77 1257/1757 Future Marketability $50,000 $289,500 37289560004 I 17 89 All of Tract 89 4.62 1257/1757 Future Marketability $50,000 $250,000 37445840005 I 24 97 All of Tract 97 5 1257/1757 Future Marketability $50,000 $250,000 37807880001 I 49 126 All of Tract 126 5.61 1257/1757 Future Marketability $34,000 $190,740 39271840002 I 18 55 All of Tract 55 4.43 1257/794 Future Marketability $50,000 $250,000 37493920003 II 78 116 E75/W180 1.17 1361/2019 Future Marketability $9,000 $10,530 40749320001 II 78 116 E75/E150 1.17 1361/2019 Future Marketability $9,000 $10,530 40749320001 II 78 158 All of Tract 158 6.66 1361/2019 Future Marketability $9,000 $56,070 40752400002 III 42 1 All of Tract 1 7.38 1361/2029 Future Marketability $14,000 $103,320 38840040001 50 66 S 105, S 180 1.59 Available 39326920000 51 3 N 75, N 150 1.17 Available 39380200009 51 35 S 75 / S 150 1.13 Available 39384040003 73 59 E 75 / W 180 1.14 Available 40474920006 73 83 E 75 / W 150 1.14 Available 40476840003 73 103 S 75 / S 150 1.17 Available 40478280001 47 52 W 105 / W 180 1.59 Available 39145640008 Total Acres 85.64Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper12/19/2017Page 155 of 2209.A.3.jPacket Pg. 701Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 1 From:Heidi Liebwein <heidi.liebwein@sbcglobal.net> Sent:Wednesday, January 13, 2016 2:08 AM To:VanLengenKris Subject:Golden Gate Growth Management meeting at Collier Extension Good morning, During the meeting it was said we were to go on the website and provide feedback. I tried and was not successful as to where, so I am sending my thoughts in this email. I do not think you should build in Golden Gate, the people who bought out there were aware of the drive when they bought out in Golden Gate. IF they are willing to accept being very rural and the drive in to retail stores, then that is how they wanted it, or they would not have bought out so far. Please do not build in Golden Gate. Thank you, Heidi Liebwein Property owner in GG Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 156 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 702 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 1 From:Susie Mahon <susiemahon@comcast.net> Sent:Wednesday, October 05, 2016 9:40 PM To:GGAMPRestudy Subject:Future of Golden Gate Estates We won't be able to get to the meeting tomorrow evening but wanted to give our input. We would love it if Green Blvd could be extended to 16th. We live at what used to be at the corner of White Blvd and 23rd street sw - but now it's a "sweeping curve". Drivers love to speed around that curve and there have been several accidents - they don't all show up in accident reports because they're mostly one car accidents - people being stupid and running into our fence or mailbox- then they leave. The traffic on this corner is really bad especially between 3 and 6 pm - it's very difficult to get out of our driveway safely during that time. Is there a way to reroute the landscape trucks and trailers? - all the landscape companies out here seem to have grown by leaps and bounds - Stahlmans, Renfroe and Jackson, Case and then there's American Farms - some of their trucks are now double semis. The 45 mph speed limit is way too fast when they're going around this curve and many times people are passing each other on the curve or when they straighten out in front of our house. Also, all these trucks are going to tear the roads up. Also, would it be possible to widen the lanes on White Blvd a little- some of the vehicles/ trucks are so wide they hardly fit in the lane. Thank you, Charlie and Susie Mahon Sent from my iPhone Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 157 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 703 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 1 From:Ron and Lilianne <militorl@rogers.com> Sent:Tuesday, October 11, 2016 4:50 PM To:GGAMPRestudy Subject:Future of Rural Golden Gate Good afternoon Thank you for the invitation to the community meeting held October 6th. Unfortunately we are in Canada right now and could not attend. We own a home at 4325 10th St. N.E. which intersects with 47th Ave N.E. 47th Ave is a well travelled street that runs off of Immokalee Road. In term of safety, this is a very narrow street with many children meeting their school buses every weekday morning. Many parents can be seen waiting at each corner with their kids in the car because it is not safe for them to wait for the school bus on the side of the road. The entrance to our neighborhood where 47th intersects with Immokalee needs a face-lift. It would be very nice to see nice landscaping and lighting on both corners to welcome residents and guests coming into the area Thank you Sincerely Ron and Lilianne Milito Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 158 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 704 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 1 From:castillaglass120@gmail.com Sent:Friday, September 30, 2016 12:05 PM To:GGAMPRestudy Subject:Future Plan recommendation Please open I-75 and Everglades Exit the ramp is there, we need acces Thank you Angel and Ingrid Castilla Sent from Mail for Windows 10 Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 159 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 705 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 1 From:Octavio Sarmiento Jr <sammyosjr@yahoo.com> Sent:Wednesday, September 21, 2016 5:06 PM To:JenkinsAnita Cc:Kitty Paz Subject:PARADISE FACILITIES Attachments:BROSURE_0301.pdf; collier_2016_sde031519696081546.jpg; EMAIL_0305.pdf; LETTER_ 0304.pdf; patio and legalization-Model.pdf 1 (6 files merged) (2).pdf; PROPERTY APPRAISER_0302.pdf; SURVEY.pdf Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Flagged Hi Anita, How are you? Hope you are doing well, we spoke on the phone few times in reference of a Church and now we also have this other Project that we had start prior, We are now also informing you of the intend and plans of Extension to the Existing Home Care Facility. I am attaching letter, documentation of the Home Care Facility, Parcel ID, Site Plan, Additions and Expanding Plans and more, so you can be aware of our intentions. Plans of expanding and adding from Six Residents to a total of 14 Residents and we love for you to add us and help us, so we can count with you and the County to be part of this new changes to the Golden Gate Master Plan, that will allow us to Expand. We like obtain that window of opportunities and continue our project, which then will continue with SDP building permits and others. Let me know if there is anything else you may need from us. My best Regards Thank you Octavio OCTAVIO SARMIENTO JR ASSA-AGENCIAS SARMIENTO S.A Permit Consultant 239-601-0485 sammyosjr@yahoo.com www.permitandplans.com 1100 Commercial Blvd #118 Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 160 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 706 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 1 From:JenkinsAnita Sent:Thursday, October 06, 2016 7:55 AM To:ScottTrinity; WilkisonDavid Cc:VanLengenKris Subject:FW: Future of Golden Gate Estates Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Flagged FYI - sharing issues identified -----Original Message----- From: Susie Mahon [mailto:susiemahon@comcast.net] Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2016 9:40 PM To: GGAMPRestudy Subject: Future of Golden Gate Estates We won't be able to get to the meeting tomorrow evening but wanted to give our input. We would love it if Green Blvd could be extended to 16th. We live at what used to be at the corner of White Blvd and 23rd street sw - but now it's a "sweeping curve". Drivers love to speed around that curve and there have been several accidents - they don't all show up in accident reports because they're mostly one car accidents - people being stupid and running into our fence or mailbox- then they leave. The traffic on this corner is really bad especially between 3 and 6 pm - it's very difficult to get out of our driveway safely during that time. Is there a way to reroute the landscape trucks and trailers? - all the landscape companies out here seem to have grown by leaps and bounds - Stahlmans, Renfroe and Jackson, Case and then there's American Farms - some of their trucks are now double semis. The 45 mph speed limit is way too fast when they're going around this curve and many times people are passing each other on the curve or when they straighten out in front of our house. Also, all these trucks are going to tear the roads up. Also, would it be possible to widen the lanes on White Blvd a little- some of the vehicles/ trucks are so wide they hardly fit in the lane. Thank you, Charlie and Susie Mahon Sent from my iPhone Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 161 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 707 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 1 From:ScavoneMichelle Sent:Wednesday, October 19, 2016 4:07 PM To:militorl@rogers.com Cc:VanLengenKris; WilkisonDavid; JenkinsAnita; ScottTrinity; KhawajaAnthony; AhmadJay; WilkisonDavid; PutaansuuGary; LulichPamela Subject:RE: TO 6153 / RE: Future of Rural Golden Gate Mr. and Mrs. Milito, Thank you for providing your comments. We appreciate your input. Staff will be reviewing all input received and forwarding to appropriate staff for future planning and programming as funding availability permits. On behalf of Staff, Michelle Scavone, GMD Operations Coordinator From: Ron and Lilianne [mailto:militorl@rogers.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2016 4:50 PM To: GGAMPRestudy Subject: Future of Rural Golden Gate Good afternoon Thank you for the invitation to the community meeting held October 6th. Unfortunately we are in Canada right now and could not attend. We own a home at 4325 10th St. N.E. which intersects with 47th Ave N.E. 47th Ave is a well travelled street that runs off of Immokalee Road. In term of safety, this is a very narrow street with many children meeting their school buses every weekday morning. Many parents can be seen waiting at each corner with their kids in the car because it is not safe for them to wait for the school bus on the side of the road. The entrance to our neighborhood where 47th intersects with Immokalee needs a face-lift. It would be very nice to see nice landscaping and lighting on both corners to welcome residents and guests coming into the area Thank you Sincerely Ron and Lilianne Milito Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 162 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 708 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 1 From:Jayne Sventek <jsventek1@hotmail.com> Sent:Thursday, February 16, 2017 6:27 AM To:GGAMPRestudy Subject:Possible improvements Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Completed Good morning... Thanks for the update on the meeting, unfortunately, I have out of town guests coming that day. If things change we hope to attend. My question concerns cell phone towers, which I have been questioning for over fifteen years for our area. It doesn't matter if it is ATT or VERIZON, our area which is directly off 951 between Pine Ridge and Vanderbilt, have limited cell signal. In fact, we built in 1990 and not much has changed near us. When we pass Logan and head towards 951 on Pine Ridge Road, passing Temple Shalom, the signal has always cut out and becomes garbled. My friends know my location while driving when I am on the phone as I pass. Also, the fairly new Publix at 951 and Pine Ridge, is known for no signal once you step inside. Even our street has limited cell reception and we have a unit in our home from ATT to boost cell strength. It is a microcell tower, they call it. I have contacted at numerous times, both cell companies and they inform me a tower is governed by county rules and regulations. They can only be installed on a school, fire station etc grounds. This needs to be looked into and see what areas need the tower, not the best spot for the tower, held by the county. I welcomed one on my nearly three acres years ago. I am not sure if this issue is on the agenda, but needs to be looked into. Come and ride with me for a day and hear how bad the signal is. Is there an agenda at this point, you may send to residents? Thank you and I wait to hear from your office. Have a great day. Mrs. Patrick B. Sventek 4680 First Avenue SW Naples, FL Sent from my iPad Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 163 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 709 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 1 From:Michael R. Ramsey <michael.r.ramsey@embarqmail.com> Sent:Thursday, February 09, 2017 2:05 PM To:VanLengenKris Cc:JenkinsAnita; Jflan241@aol.com; petergaddy@gmail.com; 'Tim Nance' Subject:RE: Estates bridges The 3 bridges that went through the MPO and were approved for funding and construction, were in the original bridge study from the E of 951 Horizon Report and recommended by all Emergency Response Agencies are: 1. 8th St. NE at Cypress Canal 2. 16th St. NE at Cypress Canal 3. 47th Ave NE at Golden Gate Main Canal As these 3 bridges move through engineering and permitting they have acquired more construction cost and it appears that we may get only 1. The extra costs are coming from items such as sidewalks and tiebacks causing additional permitting costs especially in mitigation The #4 bridge needed is a t 10th Ave SE over the Faka Union Canal. This bridge is needed because south of the Golden Gate Blvd the residents on Desoto and Everglades do not have the ability to have Emergency Agencies respond to them in 8 minutes. In many cases the response time is 15 minutes or more. Second there is only 1 evacuation route on for residents of Desoto. This bridge would allow more evacuation options for residents of both Everglades and Desoto south of Golden Gate Blvd. Third the Bridge would allow more access to Palmetto Elementary School as an Evacuation Shelter. Ramsey From: VanLengenKris [mailto:KrisVanLengen@colliergov.net] Sent: Thursday, February 9, 2017 8:50 AM To: Michael R. Ramsey Cc: JenkinsAnita Subject: Estates bridges Mike: At last night’s meeting, you mentioned “three bridges” that the GGEACA determined to be high safety/evacuation related. The first one you previously provided to me: 10th Ave SE between E’glades and De Soto. Can you please identify the others. We plan to speak with Transportation Dept. about a number of issues, and would like full input and clarity on the GGEACA recommendation. Thanks, Kris Van Lengen, JD, AICP Community Planning Manager Zoning Division, Collier County 2800 N. Horseshoe Dr. Naples, FL 34104 (239) 252-7268 www.colliergov.net/GMPrestudies Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 164 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 710 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 1 From:Carol Pratt <tjack730@aol.com> Sent:Saturday, June 17, 2017 6:43 PM To:GGAMPRestudy Subject:Wildlife and Greenway To All Whom This Concerns: Although wildlife and green spaces weren’t the biggest consideration in GGE community development, it was prominent none-the-less (in the “clouds”, these were some of the larger words). With the many road extensions and expansions slated in future development, now is the time to make plans for wildlife, which many of us in GGE value and consider a quality of life issue. Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension (VBX) has been continually moved forward on the list of projects in the county. Do you know existing natural wildlife corridors will cross this road once it is extended? I hope the county will plan for wildlife underpasses on VBX, and also consider other safeguards to protect the multitude of species which inhabit this area, including protected species such as fox squirrels, gopher tortoises, and Florida Panthers. For all future roads, plans should include the safeguarding of wildlife with underpasses, fences, through education, etc. As you well know, it is easier and more cost effective to get ahead of something like this, then to try to fix something later. Currently, Jim Flanagan (Golden Gate Estates Area Civic Association, of which I am also a member) and I are trying to get signage to warn drivers to be on the lookout for bears, panthers, and other wildlife on the roadways. This will also inform newcomers of the existence of bears and panthers in the county, which still comes as a surprise to many GGE residents. Signage of this nature should be a part of the Master Plan. A greenway has been brought up many times in the discussion of the Master Plan. A bicycle and pedestrian trail could be made alongside VBX. An independent trail is what I am suggesting - not a narrow path which is actually part of the road. I hope you will put, or keep, wildlife conservation as a part of the GGE Master Plan. If you need more information on anything I have written, please let me know and I will provide it. It has been my experience that the majority of people living in GGE want wildlife as part of their community. Thank you for considering my thoughts and suggestions. Sincerely, Carol M. Pratt Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 165 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 711 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) The Golden Gate Estates Area Civic Association Inc. PO. Box 990596, Naples, FL 34116-6002 Estates-Civic.org 11-02-16 GGEACA Board Meeting Discussion – Rural Golden Gate Estates Issues Growth Management Plan Update November 2, 2016 Kris VanLengen Collier County Growth Management Department Growth Management Plan ReStudy Manager GGAMP ReStudy - Rural Estates Mr. VanLengen, The Golden Gate Estates Area Civic Association held a working session on 10-08-16 in preparation for providing input to the GGAMP ReStudy. The following concepts were presented for discussion and reviewed at our 11-02-16 GGEACA Board Meeting. We present them to you for discussion and incorporation with the public comments for the GGAMP ReStudy. Further consideration and discussion is also suggested for the challenges and opportunities to allow for “agricultural past-times” and agricultural-related “eco-tourism” in the rural areas. As well, further definition and discussion of home-based businesses and recognizing the impacts to neighbors and infrastructure for certain business operations. The following concepts are consistent with a low-density, low-impact, rural residential community. Further definition of “rural character” and “self-sustainability” will help better define the concepts of community character and practical application that many people who consider Golden Gate Estates their home and why they moved here. The large-lot, low-density woodlands/agricultural environment associated with this unique place is rare among community choices - such is rare in Florida real estate as well as across the United States - and what makes Golden Gate Estates so desirable. Thank you for your leadership in this effort and the opportunity to provide input to the future of our community through the GGAMP ReStudy and the overall Comprehensive Growth Management ReStudy Respectfully, Mike Ramsey, President Golden Gate Estates Area Civic Association On behalf of the Board of Directors Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 166 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 712 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 02 November 2016 Page 2 The Golden Gate Estates Area Civic Association Inc. PO. Box 990596, Naples, FL 34116-6002 Estates-Civic.org A. Complementary Land Uses 1.) Formal Low Density Overlay for the Rural Estates – eliminate densification of E zoning Benefits: * DRGR/Watershed over 90,000 acres at no cost to the taxpayer Complimentary to Corkscrew Community and Sending lands in RFMUD and RLSA • Well Field Protection – county and municipal (Naples) • Community Character • Secondary habitat transition between Conservation land and development 2.) Incentivize the recombination of 1.14 acre lots (legal non-conforming) Development credit (voluntary TDR program) for use in urban density and infill? See also GGWIP 3.) Update LDC regarding compatibility requirements, setbacks, and buffers for all non-residential uses in the Estates including but not limited to Convenience Commercial, Churches, Schools, utilities. 4.) Update LDC regarding land clearing regulation and setbacks, for all uses to be consistent with Wildfire safety and management recommendations established by the Collier County Fire Districts and the Florida Forest Service. 30 feet of defensible space and acceptable setbacks for all Estates lots to allow access of emergency vehicles and equipment Consideration: Completion of the Estates Community Wildfire Protection Plan 5.) Establish appropriate Setbacks and Buffers and compatibility standards for all adjacent RFMUD and RLSA land uses. Previously recommended changes permitting non residential land uses in the RFMUD must be applied so as to preserve the rural residential character of Golden Gate Estates. To that end, it will be essential to establish appropriate buffers and transitional uses, together with appropriate controls over the location of utility service lines and transportation corridors. To achieve these goals the following recommendations are submitted: a.) Projects directly abutting residential property shall provide, at a minimum, a one-hundred (100) foot wide buffer in which no parking or water management uses are permitted. Twenty- five (25) feet of the width of the buffer along the developed area shall be a landscape buffer type C as outlined in the LDC. A minimum of fifty (75) feet of the buffer width shall consist of retained or created native vegetation and must be consistent with appropriate subsections of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC). The 100 foot buffer shall not be part of a setback, but will be a separately platted tract. Setbacks shall be a minimum of 50% of the height of any structure other than single family. b.) A solid masonry or concrete wall 8’ high and on a 3’ berm at the development (RFMUD) side of the 100’ buffer shall be required. The buffer area shall be supplemented where needed to assure an 80% opacity is reached within one year. Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 167 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 713 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 02 November 2016 Page 3 The Golden Gate Estates Area Civic Association Inc. PO. Box 990596, Naples, FL 34116-6002 Estates-Civic.org c.) All lighting shall be consistent with the Dark Skies initiative. Parking lot lighting shall be restricted to bollards except as may be required to comply with lighting standards in the Land Development Code (Ordinance #04-41, as amended) and other governing regulations. d.) Rural roadways as typically used within the Golden Gate Estates neighborhoods shall not be used for access or utility conveyance to any new development. Appropriate truck route management tools need to be employed to limit Community impact from adjacent development. All adjacent RFMUD and RLSA residential and commercial uses should be considered. 6.) Develop Rural Architectural Standards 7.) Develop Rural Median Landscape Standards B. Transportation and Mobility -Roads 1.) Complete the study for a New I-75 Interchange in the vicinity of Everglades Blvd. Consideration: Restricting expansion of Everglades Blvd. to 4 lanes to service Estates needs. RLSA growth Management planning should address appropriate right of way and developer contribution to meet RLSA transportation needs for the predicted population growth (est. 300,000+) in this planning area. No unreasonable impact on the established low density Estates. 2.) Prioritization of the improvement of Wilson Boulevard North to commercial services, and the Wilson Extension south to White Lake Boulevard to link Golden Gate Estates to North Belle Meade Receiving lands and future economic development. Provide a needed road corridor to the north, south, and west. Wilson-Benfield Corridor Study. 3.) Extend White Lake Boulevard east to the proposed new I-75 Interchange in the vicinity of Everglades Blvd. 4.) Complete the Green Boulevard Extension Study to identify an East-West corridor linking North Belle Meade Receiving lands to CR 951 and points west. Consideration: Extension of Golden Gate Parkway rather than Green Blvd., to improve connectivity and reduce the need for excessive Eminent Domain through the Estates. 5.) Complete the Randall Boulevard Extension Study to identify an East-West corridor to the RLSA. S Curve Concept review. Consideration: Improvements to intersection of Randall Blvd and Immokalee Road are a critical infrastructure need and the choke-point of Randall/Oilwell/Immokalee Rd. Consider an emergency declaration to accelerate needed improvements at this intersection due of impending transportation failures. Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 168 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 714 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 02 November 2016 Page 4 The Golden Gate Estates Area Civic Association Inc. PO. Box 990596, Naples, FL 34116-6002 Estates-Civic.org C. Economic Vitality – Commercial Development 1.) Commercial Goods, Services, Jobs for the Estates provided primarily from zoning in adjacent areas including: Orange Tree PUD, RFMUD Receiving Lands (846 Partners, N. Belle Meade), and RLSA (Rural Lands West) 2.) Possible focused Commercial Overlay within the Estates adjacent to existing Commercial in the Randall Blvd. / Oil Well Rd. area east to the intersection of Wilson Blvd. and Immokalee Rd. * Along Randall Blvd. adjacent to Publix (already zoned/) * Randall Curve / Golden Gate Land Trust 40 acre parcel across from Orangetree * Wilson Blvd. / Immokalee Rd. intersection 3.) Update Standards/Size of Convenience Commercial parcels in the Estates to provide sufficient (increased) area for road development, septic/wastewater treatment, and water retention D. Environmental Stewardship / Watershed Management Water Resources Management: 1.) Incentivize single family Water retention/detention and Dispersed Water Storage in the Estates to retain / detain storm water and promote groundwater recharge. Ponds, swales, other 2.) Support completion of the North Golden Gate Watershed Improvement Plan. GGWIP to improve drainage, support aquifer recharge, integrate with Picayune restoration. 3.) Consideration of ASR Wells in Receiving lands, especially Sec15 T49S R27E to retain/detain water from the Golden Gate Main Canal. 4.) Development of the C-1 Connector Canal and weirs to divert storm water east from the Golden Gate Main Canal to points south and east. 5.) Update regulation of impervious surface/percolation on different size Estates Lots. a. Special treatment (more restrictive) for legal, non-conforming 1.14 acre lots 6.) Review impacts and unintended consequences of a recent Ordinance (1 acre impervious rule) requiring berming and containment of water on residential properties as this impedes natural sheetflow. Intent of ordinance may have an urban coastal zone purpose and intent, however rural woodlands interface functions differently 7.) Plan for County Septic Disposal Facility to facilitate proper maintenance and legal disposal of septic waste and encourage responsible, legal management of waste from private on-site sewage treatment and disposal systems. Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 169 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 715 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 02 November 2016 Page 5 The Golden Gate Estates Area Civic Association Inc. PO. Box 990596, Naples, FL 34116-6002 Estates-Civic.org Environmental/ Conservation: 1.) Develop policies that discourage the migration of climax predators from conservation lands and RFMUD and RLSA Sending lands into the residential interface in Golden Gate Estates other and adjacent areas. 2.) Consider the development of a Voluntary TDR program and Bank to facilitate the transfer process of development credits granted for the recombination of 1.14 acre lots and wetland lots that are fundamentally unbuildable and included in the GGWIP overlay 3.) Consider Dark Sky lighting standards for rural areas for lighting at transportation infrastructure, commercial development centers, conditional use areas, and for residential standards. 4.) Consider planning for future landfill in RLSA area given the planned population, proximity of waste disposal to eastern-drifting center of the County’s residential population, and expected life and capacity of existing Collier County landfill. General Perspectives for Consideration: General recognition, distinction and acknowledgement that one size does not fit all relative to County-wide application of standards of law and community character. Consideration: Urban Coastal Zone functions differently than eastern rural areas, and as such, review processes for growth management plan changes and Land Development Plan changes should take into consideration the local application and applicability and evaluate for unintended consequences and diverging, inconsistent and incongruent intents of such changes. Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 170 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 716 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) The Golden Gate Estates Area Civic Association Inc. PO. Box 990596, Naples, FL 34116-6002 Estates-Civic.org 28 November 2016 Kris VanLengen Collier County Growth Management Department Growth Management Plan ReStudy Manager GGAMP ReStudy - Rural Estates RE: Follow up on 02 November 2016 letter regarding GGAMP Mr. VanLengen, The Golden Gate Estates Area Civic Association have received more input after the 03 November 2015 GGAMP workshop regarding the Eastern Golden Gate Estates future growth. Thank you for your leadership in this effort and the opportunity to provide input to the future of our community through the GGAMP ReStudy and the overall Comprehensive Growth Management Restudy. Respectfully, Mike Ramsey, President Golden Gate Estates Area Civic Association On behalf of the Board of Directors Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 171 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 717 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 28 November 2016 Page 2 The Golden Gate Estates Area Civic Association Inc. PO. Box 990596, Naples, FL 34116-6002 Estates-Civic.org Surface Water Management / Drainage This is considered to be the highest priority for determination for the Rural Estates and is dependent on the water management through and around the N Belle Meade Area of the RFMUD. The continued buildout of the Rural Estates and the RFMUD north of I-75 and west of the RLSA, will significantly increase impervious surface area and storm water runoff. Concurrently, there is concern for protecting groundwater recharge for the multiple areas that depend on Rural Estates groundwater resources. This issue directly effects future Residential property protection, Economic Development, Water Resources, Wildfire Protection and Transportation Design. The planning effort that needs to be undertaken would update the drainage of water from the Rural Estates to the Henderson Creek Canal. Both Marco Island Utilities and Rookery Bay are looking for more water. Economic Diversification / Development This would be the second prioritization after future surface water management has been reviewed. Economic Diversification / Development within the Rural Estates is small commercial nodes at selected intersections with each node totaling approximately 80 acres maximum. Planning of the Rural Estates nodes and zoning will be significantly influenced by the larger commercial diversification / development in the adjacent areas of the RFMUD and RLSA. The Rural Estates seeks coordination of with the RFMUD and RLSA with the larger commercial areas. Also, the design, planning and zoning for the Rural Estates Small Commercial Node areas with be greatly influenced by drainage and ground water availability. Transportation Design These would the 3rd area of Prioritization after Surface Water Management and Economic Diversification / Development have been reviewed. These are to be added to the recommendations in the First Letter of 02 Nov 2016. These recommendations should be added to the GGAMP for Rural Estates because they are not discussed or transmitted in any other part of planning for the Rural Estates. These recommendations are not to replace the MPO efforts. a. No expansion of roads from 2 lane to 4 lane, East of Everglades Blvd. b. Prioritize transportation design that moves traffic North and South within the Rural Estates. a. Prioritize installing a bridge on 8th St. SE @ Frangipani. c. Prioritize expansion of Randall Blvd, 2 lanes to 4 from Immokalee Road to Everglades d. Do not allow "S" curve from Randall to Oil Well. e. Prioritize Future I-75 interchange at or east of Desoto Blvd. f. No more "chicanes" or other traffic slowing designs that prevents school buses or other vehicles from safely traveling a 2 lane road in opposite directions. Cell Towers More locations should be identified for Cell Tower Construction. Residents favor improving cell tower coverage. Prioritizing land zoning for this development is needed. 1 acre Impervious Rule This rule was imposed on residential development in the Rural Estates without study or discussion. This rule requires singly family lot owners to implement surface water retention if the amount of impervious surface on their lot exceeds 1 acre. This rule needs to be eliminated. The impacts of these rule are: a. Significant increase to the road drainage swales b. Significant increase to the Big Cypress Basin Canals without planning c. Ecolcogical damage to adjacent wetlands by drying them out, preventing water flow. d. Significant increase in wildfire danger by draining wetlands faster in the dry season. Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 172 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 718 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Collier Soil & Water Conservation District Dennis P. Vasey, Chairman 14700 Immokalee Road, Suite B Naples, Florida 34120-1468 February 17, 2017 Mr. Leo E. Ochs, Jr., County Manager County Manager's Office 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 202 Naples, FL 34112-5746 Dear Mr. Ochs, The Board of Supervisors believes that wetland parcels constitute a valuable resource for carbon sequestration. Ecosystem enclosures 1, 2 and 3, attached. The District has a keen interest in parcels purchased to conserve, protect, and enhance fish, wildlife, plants, and their habitats for the continuing benefit of the residents of Collier County. Specifically, the Board of Supervisors believes that Conservation Collier Program parcels, when evaluated for their carbon sequestration value, could serve as a bank for funding maintenance and salaries, annually, and provide a substantial water quality and incentive opportunity for mitigation purposes in response to code enforcement and permit activity. The District reviewed the "Wetlands and Climate Change" article in light of using county-owned Conservation Collier Program wetland parcels to provide Transfer of Development Rights incentives from a "Bank." To create the Bank would require a list of Conservation Collier Program wetland parcels. Once provided, the District would create and manage, under an Interlocal Agreement, a log of wetland sequestration value, prepare documents of sale of whole or fractional share sales, and undertake monitoring activities. Sincerely, Dennis P. Vasey Attachments: a/s Cc: The Honorable Penny Taylor, Chairman, 3299 E Tamiami TRL, STE 303, Naples, FL 34112 Mr. Steve Carnell, Department Head, Public Services Department, 3299 E Tamiami TRL, Naples, FL 34112 Vacant Group 1 Nancy Richie Group 2 Dennis P. Vasey Group 3 Clarence Tears Group 4 Rob Griffin Group 5 Web Site: http://www.collierscd.org Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 173 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 719 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) NORTH COLLIER FIRE CONTROL AND RESCUE DISTRICT BOARD OF FIRE COMMISSIONERS M. James Burke  Christopher L. Crossan  Norman E. Feder  J. Christopher Lombardo  John O. McGowan February 14, 2017 Leo Ochs, County Manager Collier County Manager’s Office 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 202 Naples, FL 34112 Mr. Ochs: Please allow this letter to evidence the support of the North Collier Fire Control and Rescue District for the approval and construction of the following bridges currently contained in the Golden Gate Estates Bridges project:  10th Avenue S.E. between Everglades and Desoto  8th Street N.E. from Golden Gate Blvd. to Randall Blvd.  16th Street N.E. from Golden Gate Blvd. to Randall Blvd.  47th Avenue N.E. from Immokalee Road to Everglades Blvd. The connectivity that these bridges would increase public safety with enhanced mobility allowing for faster response times for emergency services (EMS, Fire, CCSO) and improved evacuation routes during hurricanes, wildfires or other natural disasters. These bridges are supported by both the Horizon Study and the Bridge Study (2009). We ask that Collier County Growth Management seriously consider approving these bridges within the Golden Gate Estates Bridges project which will assuredly enhance life safety for the residents and communities in the area. Sincerely, James Cunningham Fire Chief Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 174 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 720 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Correspondence Regarding Western Golden Gate Estates Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 175 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 721 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 1 From:Chris Henning <chenning@continentalfin.com> Sent:Wednesday, May 10, 2017 4:06 PM To:VanLengenKris Cc:rrosin@peat.com; ELLEN ROSENBERG (ellenrosenbergdesign@gmail.com) Subject:RE: Golden Gate Area Master Plan restudy. Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Completed Mr. Van Lengen: To carry forward from our previous discussion, we own 2 parcels in the Golden Gate Area Master Plan- Urban Estates. These parcels are 6715 Golden Gate Parkway (currently a residence) and the approximately 7 acre parcel (as referenced here- the “Undeveloped Parcel”) at the north-west corner of Golden Gate Parkway and Santa Barbara Blvd. Our objective with these parcels is to develop a commercially-viable project. Our group purchased the Undeveloped Parcel in 2007 with the intention of building a medical office building for Anchor Health. At the time, one of the partners formerly associated with our group, Paul Zampell, was in the process of building a medical office for Anchor Health on 951. Paul believed that Anchor wanted to proceed with our parcel as well. Unfortunately, after acquiring the Undevleoped Parcel, Anchor Health, the prospective tenant, decided that it no longer wanted to expand its office locations and withdrew from the project. Having lost our intended tenant and unable to locate an alternate medical office user, we ordered a market study which identified healthcare as a use which would generate sufficient demand to support development. We incurred significant architectural and planning costs in the course of coming up with a mix of assisted living, memory care, skilled nursing, and independent living units on the property. The PUD did not support alternate healthcare uses so we sought zoning relief which ultimately was tabled shortly before Mr. Joseph Rosin, Mr. Zampell’s original partner, passed away. The Undeveloped Parcel is one of 2 parcels designated as Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict on the “Future Land Use Map.” Note that though referred to as “Future” on the map, it is the land use zoning currently in place for the undeveloped parcel. We are limited to a single story structure of not more than 35,000 square feet, and the only permitted use is for medical office. Unfortunately, the limitations imposed make this parcel nearly impossible to develop and none of the prospective purchasers who have contacted us, are interested in the current zoning. We would like to develop this property for commercial purposes consistent with other properties in the area, such as the CVS across the street from us. The corner parcel across from us to the south on Golden Gate has, to our knowledge, been acquired with the intention of commercial development. As more residents move to the area, it is only natural that signalized corner parcels such as ours be developed with retail uses to support them. We appreciate your consideration and would request either that the Commercial Infill Subdistrict restrictions be changed, or that the Development Parcel be moved to a new designation that would allow for more commercial options than currently exist. Should you have any suggestions in terms of participating in the general master plan review process that is going on, please let us know. Sincerely, Chris Henning III Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 176 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 722 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 2 847-291-3700 From: VanLengenKris [mailto:KrisVanLengen@colliergov.net] Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 3:43 PM To: chenning@continentalfin.com; rrosin@peat.com Cc: jenglish@barroncollier.com; dgenson@barroncollier.com; JenkinsAnita Subject: Golden Gate Area Master Plan restudy. Chris and Robert: We discussed a property of interest to you approximately 2 months ago. It is located in a future land use designation: Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict. It is zoned PUD, and located in the northwest quadrant of the Santa Barbara and Golden Gate Parkway intersection. As an update, we began a series of public outreach meetings, all introductory in nature, pertaining to Rural Estates, Urban Estates and GG City. We will resume in the fall with topics more granular in nature, such as comp plan and zoning subdistrict overlays. A meeting summary of the Urban Estates introductory meeting can be found at: http://www.colliergov.net/your-government/divisions-s-z/zoning-division/community-planning-section/golden-gate- area-master-plan-restudy/public-workshops . 1. My notes indicate that you were considering sending an e-mail at some point to express your points of view. 2. I thought you might be interested to know that we met with Barron Collier engineers/planners, who expressed an interest in development in the SW quadrant of the same intersection. In case you think there might be commonality of interest or perspective, I have copied them on this e-mail and you may wish to contact them directly. Sincerely, Kris Van Lengen, JD, AICP Community Planning Manager Zoning Division, Collier County 2800 N. Horseshoe Dr. Naples, FL 34104 (239) 252-7268 www.colliergov.net/GMPrestudies Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 177 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 723 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 1 From:WeeksDavid Sent:Wednesday, June 10, 2015 6:13 PM To:wconfoy@comcast.net Cc:VanLengenKris Subject:RE: MEETING Mr. Confoy, How about June 24 at 3:00pm? I would be joined by colleague Kris van Lengen, Community Planning Manager. David Weeks David Weeks, AICP, Growth Management Manager Collier County Government, Growth Management Department Zoning Division, Comprehensive Planning Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, FL 34104 phone: 239-252-2306; E-fax: 239-252-6689 email: davidweeks@colliergov.net ; website: www.colliergov.net From: wconfoy@comcast.net [mailto:wconfoy@comcast.net] Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2015 1:55 PM To: WeeksDavid Subject: FW: MEETING Dear David Thank you for accepting this email requesting your time to visit with some of your fellow Naples citizens for discussion of the upcoming review of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan. Specifically we represent the neighborhoods that would be affected by any change proposed to Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Rd. and Santa Barbara. We hope to present our reasons for opposing such changes as not being in the best interests of the surrounding Communities at large. We have a roll up display showing each property owner along this gateway & will demonstrate why the residents on both sides of the street wish it to maintain its residential character. Many of us have lived here 20, even 30, years, have our families close-by & wish to maintain the Master plan as it was written by the County. Yes, it might be a bit early but the summer is upon us and our schedules never seem to be in sync. Better to give you an early look see into what is ahead, than when it is right upon us. We know that the outsiders are working towards the opposite goals & have been visiting persons like yourself to support & endorse a re-zoning change—a change to which we are totally opposed . Obviously we hope to show you why & solicit your support when the time arises. Dan Brundage, Tom Collins & myself will attend; we sometimes have two others & will give you their names when they confirm their availability to us. Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 178 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 724 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 2 We are generally available any weekday in mid afternoon. Right now we can all be there this month between the 23rd and the 29th in the mid to latter part of the afternoon. An hour or less is requested. I don’t believe you would be disappointed in what we can show you. Thank you Bill Confoy-- 262-0802/ 643-0001 Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 179 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 725 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 1 From:Carlos Vasallo <cvasallo@comcast.net> Sent:Friday, October 21, 2016 4:18 PM To:GGAMPRestudy Subject:Western GG Ests Hello Thank you for the meeting last night and keeping us informed and involved. I would like to know what the county's plan is for the property it owns at the southwest corner of Vanderbilt Bch Rd & Collier Blvd. Last night there was a question about a nature trail/bike path and lack of land for it. You might recall when Collier Boulevard was expanded a few years ago a rec. path was added on the East side of the CR951 canal using the easement. Some units, for example units #1, #2, #95, & #32 have a canal at the end of the streets, using the existing canal easement a loop could be built from Vanderbilt Bch Rd to Pine Ridge Road with a nature/bike path on both sides so residents from both sides could use it. Please add me to your email list for future meetings. Thank you, Carlos Vasallo 4381 5th Ave NW Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 180 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 726 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. Ph. 239-947-1144 Fax. 239-947-0375 3800 Via Del Rey EB 0005151 LB 0005151 LC 26000266 Bonita Springs, FL 34134 www.gradyminor.com May 1, 2017 Mr. Kris VanLengen, AICP Via Email: KrisVanLengen@colliergov.net RE: Tracts 103 (east 180’), 119, and 120 Golden Gates Estates, Unit 26 Dear Mr. VanLengen: We represent the property owner of the above referenced parcels located at the SW quadrant of the intersection of Collier Boulevard and 13th Avenue S.W. The parcels total approximately 12.5 acres. This property had a pending Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) amendment in 2014, which the property owner requested it to be placed in abeyance, in order to participate in the re-study process. An aerial location exhibit is attached for your convenience. We wanted to provide you with some additional information regarding the parcel as a follow-up to our meeting on April 4, 2017, which we believe will demonstrate that this property should be re-evaluated for the potential of non-residential land uses as part of the re-study effort. Under the current GGAMP, the site is designated Estates, and based on the existing criteria, the site is only eligible for one dwelling unit per 2.25 acres. The site is ineligible for even Transitional Conditional Uses. The property owner recognizes that the property’s proximity to the quasi- industrial FP&L PUD, and the newly 6-lane segment of Collier Boulevard, renders it illogical and incompatible for very low density residential uses. The property owner had previously proposed to amend the GGAMP to re-designate this property as an additional Neighborhood Center, with additional restrictions on buffer and setback standards for the 12.5+/- acre property. It has been our consistent contention that the property is not appropriately designate for only low-density residential dwellings due to the changing neighborhood conditions with the expanded Collier Boulevard and the increasing number of vehicle trips that utilize this major roadway corridor serving the eastern areas of Collier County. An economic analysis had also been prepared in support of the amendment, which demonstrated that the demand for additional office and retail services could be supported by the growing population of both Golden Gate City and the Estates area east of Collier Boulevard. Additionally, with the then impending expansion of Collier Boulevard to a 6-lane arterial roadway, additional pass-by trips were anticipated, also contributing to the market viability for office, retail and service uses. In our prior discussions with Growth Management staff, they were not supportive of an amendment to the GGAMP that would result in retail and office development on this site. They did; however, support an amendment that would re-designate this site as a Conditional Use Sub- District which would then permit the owner to submit a Conditional Use for a variety of non- Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 181 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 727 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Mr. Kris VanLengen RE: Tracts 103 (east 180’), 119, and 120 Golden Gates Estates, Unit 26 May 1, 2017 Page 2 of 2 residential uses. Some of these land uses would include churches, schools, day care, group housing/group care, private schools and social/fraternal organizations. In our most recent discussions with you, you too acknowledged that the site may no longer be appropriately designated to only permit low density residential development. In that meeting, we discussed the possibility of possibly modifying the Transitional Conditional Use section of the GGAMP in order to permit this property to qualify to apply for a conditional use. The GGAMP already acknowledges that these conditional uses can be good transitions between non-residential and residential land uses. We believe that a minor amendment to paragraph 3e), Special Exceptions to Conditional Use Locational Criteria would be appropriate to specifically indicate that this property would be eligible to seek a conditional use of the E, Estates zoning designation. The amended language could read: 5. The east 180 feet of Tract 103, Tract 119 and Tract 120, Unit 26, Golden Gate Estates are eligible for conditional uses as identified in Estates zoning district. We would appreciate your consideration of this minor change to the GGAMP as you continue your re-study efforts. We believe the unique location of this parcel adjacent to the existing FP&L PUD, which permits not only electric generating substations, but also open equipment storage, maintenance and fueling facilities and any other use deemed appropriate for FP&L (since the FPL plant is no longer subject to local zoning restrictions) is incompatible with very low density residential use. The property too, is located on a 6-lane arterial, which contributes to the incompatibility of the site for residential use. Attached are photos of the FPL plant, the subject property and its intersection on Collier Boulevard Sincerely, D. Wayne Arnold, AICP Attachments c: Via Email Larry Brooks Bruce Anderson GradyMinor File Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 182 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 728 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 1 From:Barbara Coen <barbcoen@comcast.net> Sent:Tuesday, May 10, 2016 7:51 PM To:VanLengenKris Subject:RE: GG Master plan proposal. Keep the Estates Residential. Dear Mr. Van Lengen, I, too live on 68th Street S. W. and am VERY opposed to Edwin Koert's plan for my neighborhood. I would be at the meeting tomorrow, but am in Kansas City dealing with family matters. This man is only concerned about making a buck. He does not care at all about our residential neighborhood I implore you to deny his request to re-zone so that he can make our neighborhood look like Pine Ridge Road. We are not Miami, nor do we want to be! You may contact me at: 239-777-4085 if you need more information. Thank you for your time in this matter, Barbara Coen 2780--68th Street S.W. Naples, FL 34105 barbcoen@comcast. net 239-777-4085 Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE DROID On May 10, 2016 3:51 PM, VanLengenKris <KrisVanLengen@colliergov.net> wrote: Dear Ms. Turner: Thank you for your interest and comment. We will preserve your comment related to Golden Gate Area Master Plan, Western Estates. If you wish to be added to our distribution list for meeting announcements, etc., please let me know. Respectfully, Kris Van Lengen, JD, AICP Community Planning Manager Zoning Division, Collier County 2800 N. Horseshoe Dr. Naples, FL 34104 (239) 252-7268 www.colliergov.net/GMPrestudies Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 183 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 729 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 2 From: Angela Turner [mailto:ajturner37@hotmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2016 3:33 PM To: TaylorPenny <PennyTaylor@colliergov.net>; VanLengenKris <KrisVanLengen@colliergov.net> Cc: barbcoen@comcast.net; Dan Dagnall <dan.dagnall@gmail.com> Subject: GG Master plan proposal. Keep the Estates Residential. After receiving a letter regarding a meeting planned for tomorrow to possibly re-zone our residential neighborhood to commercial I submit the following letter and past correspondence. When Commissioner Taylor was running for election she promised us that this would not happen. I am hoping that that promise will be kept! Golden Gate Master Plan. Keep the Estates Residential. Golden Gate Parkway. We have previously objected to the proposed changes in making the area between Livingston and Santa Barbara with ANY commercializations. We built our home in 1989 and unlike Pine Ridge Road there are too many private homes that feed onto the Parkway. Since exit 105 from 1-75 and the overpass was put in place it is almost impossible to get out of our street as it is, especially in season. We have already had over 3 fatalities at the end of our street and when I wrote to the County to request a light be put in place because of the gym and Bingo hall at the end of our street and the alterations to the other streets that have to utilize ours to make UTurns to head west it is a nightmare. The County flat out said "no, a stop light would cause more accidents". We have too many families with young children and children who are now learning to drive to be put in danger. Again, Golden Gate Estates was built for residential and it was well over 30 years ago. Too many families have taken stake in their properties and homes to be violated by commercialization. The investors who are attempting this change are not for the benefit of the residents...it's money for their pockets. The apartment complex that was just built on the corner of the Parkway and Livingston should prove to be another traffic nightmare. Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 184 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 730 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 3 Subject: GG Parkway From: ajturner37@hotmail.com Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2014 19:37:33 -0400 To: fredcoyle@colliergov.net Commissioner Coyle, We, the residents off Golden Gate Parkway, recently received correspondence regarding a request to re-zone the one mile radius that impacts our home. I wanted to share the most recent correspondence from them and my response. I am afraid that many of our neighbors did not take into consideration the initial letter that was sent and have not read it. This is very disturbing that these people are trying to modify our existing peace and security. Would you please take the time to read their proposal and let us know if there is anyway they can actually achieve what they are asking for. Thank you. Angela Turner Sent from my iPad Begin forwarded message: From: Angela Turner <ajturner37@hotmail.com> Date: June 4, 2014 at 7:25:06 PM EDT To: "edwinkoert@msn.com" <edwinkoert@msn.com> Subject: GG parkway Not liking this at all. Your proposing to use our street as a major road and a gas station. I need to know who on 68th Street SW responded to your initial letter. I already tried for a light, as I mentioned before, and the County flat out declined. Why would 68th Street SW want to allow the traffic and further dis-value to our homes, not to mention the safety of our children. Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 185 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 731 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 4 Pine Ridge extension has all the stuff they need getting off I75. That part is hideous. We have a beautiful landscaped exit as it is, it doesn't need to be destroyed by adding anymore commerce to the frontage and making our homes less attractive. Closest gas stations are already good enough for those who choose not to use the Pine Ridge amenities. Why are you concentrating using 68th and 60th when you don't own any properties at the "proposed" sites for first modifications. Mr. Perrine is the realtor for the properties that were acquired and the owners, as well as the original company that purchased the parcels that Wildcat I and II, whom you are the trustee, now own, knew that these were residential. Why is he putting his on the market for 4 million and 2 million with a description that says "Possible commercial usage, ideal for gas station, church, retail shopping, etc". Why is he lying. Putting that out as a possibility is baiting a proposed buyer and misleading! Your initial mailing would have been thrown away but I had the time to actually open and read it. Maybe that is why you have not gotten the responses. I am certain that NO ONE on our street is going to go for these changes. Angela Turner Sent from my iPad On Jun 3, 2014, at 4:36 PM, edwinkoert@msn.com wrote: To all who has responded: The purpose of our rezoning initiative is not to offend anyone, but to inform all of the property owners Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 186 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 732 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 5 located within the GGPkwy geographic area of our activities to have the corridor rezoned to a commercial application. Believe me, your view "for or against" our rezoning activity does not offend me. Everyone has an opinion, and as such, yours, as- well-as your peers, is just as important and will be considered too. I am an old Florida Boy from youth - 7-years (the East coast - Hollywood / Ft. Lauderdale through high school 1958) My homestead address is now a retirement community off of I-75 Exit 240, known as Sun City Center. However, I, as-well-as Brent have two each 35-year old dogs in the hunt fronting GGPkwy, and as such, I am in the Naples area quite frequently. My specific properties are on the West side of I-75, fronting GGpkwy, one on the North side and one on the South side of GGPkwy. My foot prints in the Naples area goes back to the early sixties. To assist you on Brent and my thoughts, I am attaching two graphic diagrams. The diagrams include all of the properties fronting the East and West Side of I-75, including our suggested modifications. The PDF diagrams can be enlarged by increasing the zoom percent within the PDF. Also, attached a a letter containing our thoughts on the development of the area. You may wish to review them, or discard them. While reading the WORD document you may wish to have the diagrams available. We do make the information available to all. As each of you are aware, initially, I released 700- mailings. Currently, 16 of you have responded, and I thank you for your input. Sincerely, Edwin H. Koert Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 187 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 733 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 6 239-289-4420 edwinkoert@msn.com <GGPkwy - East Side of I-75.pdf> <GGPkwy - West Side of I-75.pdf> <GGPkwy -032414 - Hard look at the North and South Sides.doc> Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 188 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 734 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 7 Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 189 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 735 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 8 Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 190 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 736 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 9 Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 191 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 737 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 10 Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 192 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 738 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 1 From:Elizabeth Foster <elizabeth@judithliegeoisdesigns.com> Sent:Friday, October 28, 2016 12:22 PM To:GGAMPRestudy Subject:Fwd: Western Golden Gate Estates Planning Study Sent from my iPhone Date: October 28, 2016 at 10:58:55 AM EDT To: <GGAMPrestudy@colliergov.net> Subject: Western Golden Gate Estates Planning Study To Planning and Zoning Division, Regarding ongoing study of uses for Golden Gate Parkway from Santa Barbara Avenue to Livingston Ave: We request, to maintain rural character of this area, that existing zoning in this area remain in place as currently in effect and no additional commercial use be permitted. Thank you, Elizabeth Foster 2711 68th St. SW. Naples FL34105 239-777.8818 Elifoster@hotmail.com Right-click or tap and hold here to download pictures. To help protect your privacy, Outlook prevented automatic download of this picture from the Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 193 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 739 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 1 From:Barbara Coen <barbcoen@comcast.net> Sent:Wednesday, September 28, 2016 8:16 AM To:GGAMPRestudy Subject:Golden Gate Area Master Plan restudy To Whom it may concern: I have lived on 68th Street S.W. since 1989. In that time, I have watched the construction of I-75 Exit 105, the Golden Gate bridge over Airport Road, and the development of a huge apartment complex on the corner of Golden Gate Parkway and Livingston Road. I love my residential area and I am against letting it be taken over by companies like Race Trac and other commercial uses. I am also concerned about any more large apartment complexes being constructed due to the already massive traffic concession that exists now. I wish I could attend one of the three workshops to discuss my views, but I have conflicts all 3 dates Thank you for your consideration of my opinions, Barbara S. Coen 2780 68th Street S.W. Naples, FL 34105 Phone: 239-777-4085 Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 194 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 740 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 1 From:Tony Ojanovac <amoappraisals@gmail.com> Sent:Wednesday, May 11, 2016 7:04 PM To:GGAMPRestudy Subject:Golden Gate Area Master Plan west of Collier Blvd (CR951) Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Completed To Whom It May Concern, I live 2830 66th St SW and attended a meeting held by Collier County on 05/11/2016 regarding the GGAMP. I would like to be on record that I, along with the large majority of other at the above mentioned meeting, am NOT in favor of making any portion of Golden Gate Parkway (between Santa Barbara Blvd & Livingston Rd) commercial. There is no need whatsoever for this proposal, as there are plenty of commercial areas within one square mile of this area. In addition, present traffic in this area is already heavy without potential commercial use parcels. We want the GGAMP to remain as written, as the commissioners promised, and left alone. Anthony M. Ojanovac Cert.Res. RD7070 AMO Appraisals, Inc. Sent from my iPhone Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 195 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 741 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 1 From:Daniel Jenkins <dwj2790@gmail.com> Sent:Monday, May 09, 2016 2:35 PM To:VanLengenKris Subject:Golden Gate Master Plan Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Flagged Mr. VanLengen, I am writing you to express my strong opposition to any changes to the Golden Gate Area Master Plan along Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. I oppose the commercialization of the Parkway or Apartments along the Parkway. I am in favor of maintaining the "Estates" residential zoning which protects the QUIET, RESIDENTIAL character of our neighborhood. Thank You, Daniel W. Jenkins 2718 68th ST SW Naples, FL 34105 Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 196 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 742 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 1 From:Kevin Keyes <kevinkeyes99@aol.com> Sent:Thursday, June 02, 2016 6:00 PM To:VanLengenKris Subject:GGAMP I wish to make known my opinion to any changes to the Golden Gate Area master plan along golden gate parkway between Livingston road and Santa Barbara boulevard. I oppose the commercialization of the parkway or apartments along the parkway. I am in favor of maintaining the "Estates" residential zoning which protects the quiet, residential character of our neighborhood. Sent from my iPhone Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 197 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 743 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 1 From:eflenney@comcast.net Sent:Tuesday, May 10, 2016 3:26 PM To:VanLengenKris Subject:Golden Gate Area Master Plan This correspondence serves as my opposition to any changes to the Golden Gate Area Master Plan along Golden Gate Parkway, between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Blvd. I oppose any type of commercialization along the Parkway, or any type of apartments along the Parkway. I am in favor of maintaining the "Estates" Residential zoning which protects the quiet, residential character of my neighborhood; as it was meant to be. Elizabeth Lenney 3220 66th Street SW Resident at this address 21 years Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 198 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 744 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 1 From:boystravel17@comcast.net Sent:Monday, July 11, 2016 3:26 PM To:VanLengenKris Subject:Commercialization of GG Parkway Follow Up Flag:Follow Up Flag Status:Flagged We wish to make known our opposition to any changes to the Golden Gate area master plan along Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. We oppose the commercialization of the Parkway or apartments along the Parkway. I am in favor of maintaining the "Estates" residential zoning which protects the quiet, residential character of our neighborhood. We are interested in receiving notices of future meetings. Thank you, Carmen and Jorge Lopez 2831 64th Street SW Naples, FL 34105 Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 199 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 745 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 1 From:Jo Gennis <josephinegg@yahoo.com> Sent:Thursday, May 05, 2016 11:24 PM To:VanLengenKris Subject:GoldenGate Master Plan This email is to notify you of my opposition to ANY changes in the Golden Gate Master Plan (along Golden Gate Pkwy.,between Livingston Rd. and Santa Barbara Blvd.). I oppose the commercialization and/or apartments along the Pkwy. We must keep the "estates zoning" ( as promised ) to keep our neighborhood 100% residential. Currently, large single family homes are being built and sold in this area. Many of the older homes have been upgraded. Children who grew up here, are now adult homeowners. This is a prime residential area and we want to keep it that way. Sincerely, Larry & Josephine Gennis 2711 66 St. S.W. Naples,Fl.34105 Sent from Jo's iPad Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 200 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 746 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 1 From:dapbrock@comcast.net Sent:Thursday, May 05, 2016 5:56 PM To:VanLengenKris Cc:dapbrock@comcast.net Subject:Golden Gate Area Master Plan - Opposition to Commercialization We wish to make known our strong opposition to any changes to the Golden Gate Area Master Plan along Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. We oppose the commercialization of the Parkway or apartments along the Parkway. We are in favor of maintaining the "Estates" Residential Zoning which protects the quiet residential character of our beautiful neighborhood. Please keep us informed of any changes - proposed or otherwise - at the address below. Thank you. Derek and Pam Brock 2845 66th Street SW Naples, Florida 34105 dapbrock@comcast.net Derek- 239-404-3848 cell Pam- 239-961-5136 cell Sent from Xfinity Connect Mobile App Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 201 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 747 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 1 From:Whitney Murphy <wnofl@aol.com> Sent:Monday, May 09, 2016 11:20 AM To:VanLengenKris Subject:Oppose Commercialization of Golden Gate Parkway I wish to make known my strong opposition to any changes to the Golden Gate Area Master Plan along Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Blvd. I strongly oppose the commercialization of the parkway or apartments along the parkway. I am in favor of maintaining the "Estates" Residential Zoning which protects the quiet, residential character of our neighborhood. Please add me to the Collier County Government email list so that I may receive notices of future meetings regarding this matter. Thank you very much, Whitney Murphy Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 202 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 748 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 1 From:ohmantrisha@aol.com Sent:Thursday, June 02, 2016 6:08 PM To:VanLengenKris Subject:GGAMP I wish to make known my opposition to any changes to the Golden Gate Area Master Plan along Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. I oppose the commercialization of the parkway or apartments along the parkway. I am in favor of maintaining the "Estates" residential zoning which protects the quite, residential character of our neighborhood. Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 203 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 749 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 1 From:JenkinsAnita Sent:Friday, May 13, 2016 8:23 AM To:Tony Ojanovac Cc:GGAMPRestudy; VanLengenKris Subject:RE: Golden Gate Area Master Plan west of Collier Blvd (CR951) Tony, Thank you for taking the time to attend the meeting and provide your written comments in the email below. Your involvement is very much appreciated and your comments will certainly be maintained as part of the record. We have added your email address to the distribution list and will notify you when the next public meeting is scheduled. In the meantime, please don't hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or would like additional information. Sincerely, Anita Jenkins, AICP Community Planning Section Collier County Growth Management Department 2800 N. Horseshoe Dr. Naples, FL 34104 (239) 252-8288 www.colliergov.net/GMPrestudies -----Original Message----- From: Tony Ojanovac [mailto:amoappraisals@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2016 7:04 PM To: GGAMPRestudy Subject: Golden Gate Area Master Plan west of Collier Blvd (CR951) To Whom It May Concern, I live 2830 66th St SW and attended a meeting held by Collier County on 05/11/2016 regarding the GGAMP. I would like to be on record that I, along with the large majority of other at the above mentioned meeting, am NOT in favor of making any portion of Golden Gate Parkway (between Santa Barbara Blvd & Livingston Rd) commercial. There is no need whatsoever for this proposal, as there are plenty of commercial areas within one square mile of this area. In addition, present traffic in this area is already heavy without potential commercial use parcels. We want the GGAMP to remain as written, as the commissioners promised, and left alone. Anthony M. Ojanovac Cert.Res. RD7070 AMO Appraisals, Inc. Sent from my iPhone Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 204 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 750 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 1 From:Lisa Pearl <lisampearl@gmail.com> Sent:Wednesday, May 11, 2016 1:24 PM To:VanLengenKris Cc:Lisa; Scott Pearl Subject:Opposition to the commercialization of the parkway Dear Kris, We feel very strongly about voicing our opinion and concern for the proposed development along Golden Gate Parkway. My family and I wish to make known our opposition to any changes to the Golden Gate area master plan along Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. We fully opposed the commercialization of the parkway or apartments along the parkway. We are in favor of maintaining the estates residential zoning which protects the quiet residential character of our neighborhood. Please protect our town and the families that have called Naples home for over 20 years. Scott, Lisa, Zachary and Riley Pearl 2690 66th Street Sw Naples, Fl 34105 Downing Frye Realty 239.248.2705 LisaMPearl@gmail.com 2014 / 2015 Platinum Award Winner www.NaplesHomeSpecialist.com Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 205 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 751 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 1 From:Eric Solomon <elsolomon65@gmail.com> Sent:Wednesday, May 11, 2016 12:22 PM To:VanLengenKris Cc:Jessica Horowitz Subject:Proposed Commercialization of Golden Gate Parkway Dear Mr. VanLengen We have lived at 2760 66th St SW, Naples since August 2013. One of the primary reasons we purchased that particular piece of property was the longstanding developed residential nature of the community and its proximity to all Naples has to offer. It is important that our voices are heard at the County level. Unfortunately we are unable to personally attend tonight's workshop regarding the commercial rezoning efforts due to prior commitments. To be clear we wish to make it known that we vehemently oppose any changes to the Golden Gate Master Plan along Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. We oppose commercialization of the Parkway and/or apartments along the Parkway. We are in favor of maintaining the Estates Residential Zoning which protects the quiet, residential character of our neighborhood. We welcome all opportunity to be heard. If you wish to speak with us directly my cell number is (239) 293-7138 and Jessica's is (239) 293-6954. You are of course also welcome to email us anytime and would be most appreciative if you would include us on all correspondence pertaining to this matter on a go-forward basis. Thank you for your time. Eric Solomon & Jessica Horowitz 2760 66th Street SW Naples FL 34105 Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 206 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 752 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 1 From:VanLengenKris Sent:Friday, May 13, 2016 9:25 AM To:'Don Stevenson' Cc:Mike Bosi (MichaelBosi@colliergov.net); JenkinsAnita; FrenchJames; SawyerMichael; WilkisonDavid Subject:RE: GGAMP zoning change to allow Commercial Development on Golden Gate Parkway??? Attachments:GGAMP Upcoming Workshops News Release final 4-20-16.pdf; Golden Gate Area Master Plan 2nd Workshop News Release 5-11-16.pdf Dear Mr. Stevenson: Thank you for your interest in the Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy (“Restudy”). Your communication will be retained for the record, and we will add your contact information to our e-mail distribution list. The attached notices should help explain the nature of the Growth Management Plan Restudy. These notices were provided as press releases to local news outlets and posted on the County’s website. At the request of several residents, this notice was also e-mailed to those residents. As the Restudy ideally involves all 36,000 households in the Golden Gate Area, it was not financially feasible to provide letter notices to all homes. We were pleased to provide an introduction to the Restudy to a group of residents in the Estates area west of Collier Blvd. on May 11, 2016. As you will note, the nature of the project is to examine all aspects of the current GGAMP, determine whether its provisions reflect the values and vision of residents and stakeholders today, and provide observations and recommendations to the Board of County Commissioners. We hope that you will visit our website noted in the attachments, to be updated frequently, so that you can review the current plan provisions, communicate with staff, and plan on attending future meetings as approved by the Growth Management Oversight Committee. To our knowledge, there has been no recent rezone proposal for Golden Gate Parkway properties. Yours, Kris Van Lengen, JD, AICP Community Planning Manager Zoning Division, Collier County 2800 N. Horseshoe Dr. Naples, FL 34104 (239) 252-7268 www.colliergov.net/GMPrestudies From: Don Stevenson [mailto:Don@DonStevensonDesign.com] Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2016 7:38 PM To: VanLengenKris <KrisVanLengen@colliergov.net> Cc: FialaDonna <DonnaFiala@colliergov.net>; HillerGeorgia <GeorgiaHiller@colliergov.net>; HenningTom <TomHenning@colliergov.net>; TaylorPenny <PennyTaylor@colliergov.net>; NanceTim <TimNance@colliergov.net>; FrenchJames <jamesfrench@colliergov.net>; SawyerMichael <MichaelSawyer@colliergov.net>; WilkisonDavid <DavidWilkison@colliergov.net>; BosiMichael <MichaelBosi@colliergov.net>; WeeksDavid <DavidWeeks@colliergov.net>; jenkinsanita@colliergov.net; BellowsRay <RayBellows@colliergov.net> Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 207 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 753 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 2 Subject: GGAMP zoning change to allow Commercial Development on Golden Gate Parkway??? Importance: High Dear Kris, I have been sent communications stating that the GGAMP is exploring a change in zoning to allow commercial uses on Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Blvd. My personal home is located on 66th street SW, literally one lot away from Golden Gate Parkway. My family an I are adamantly opposed to any changes to current zoning of the parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Blvd. This topic has come up previously by varied developers and we have opposed them every time they surface. I am not sure if you are the person in charge of the upcoming workshop or not, but I received your name in connection with the proposed workshop to discuss rezoning of the Master plan associated with the Golden Gate Parkway area between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Blvd. I will be reaching out to all of my contacts in the Collier County Growth Management Division to voice my opposition, as well as all of the county commissioners. Over the last 20 years I have been involved in countless development projects, PUDs, SDPs Replats and Rezones in Collier County, many of them residential and commercial rezoning projects, therefore I'm very experienced in the process. For the record, No Public Notice was Mailed to my home address which indicates that the public meeting may have not been properly advertised per the Collier County requirements. This is extremely alarming to say the least, especially knowing that the various developers have been trying to sneak this type of zoning change by the residents of this area for years now. I will be in adamant opposition to any change to the parkway zoning, and use all my professional resources, my experience and my company resources to make sure our neighborhood zoning remains unchanged. Commercial applications are not the right use for this area, it is and always has been zoned residential and estates. The traffic impact study reports (TIS) for this section go GG Parkway will also show the danger to the public if any commercial development is considered for this area in question. Please help to keep our residential neighborhood and our children safe from the dangerous traffic and social impacts of a change of this nature to the current zoning. During the installation approval process of the I-75 Interchange installation in December of 2007 the county commissioners adopted language into the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) that specifically and undeniably restricts any new modifications of improvements of Commercial development on the stretch of Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Blvd. other than the existing Center Point Church and The David Lawrence Center. Please review the Master Plan language that was adopted in 2007 and forward this information to the county commissioners and your supervisors for review. Please keep my email on your communication list regarding any items or communication related to and changes to the GGAMP between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Blvd. Thank you for your time. Don Stevenson, President Don Stevenson Design, Inc. Lotus Architecture, Inc. AA#26001786 2950 Tamiami Trail N. Suite 16 Naples, FL 34103 Phone: 239-304-3041 Email: Don@DonStevensonDesign.com Web: www.DonStevensonDesign.com Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 208 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 754 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 3 Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 209 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 755 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 1 From:Angela Turner <ajturner37@hotmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, May 10, 2016 3:33 PM To:TaylorPenny; VanLengenKris Cc:barbcoen@comcast.net; Dan Dagnall Subject:GG Master plan proposal. Keep the Estates Residential. After receiving a letter regarding a meeting planned for tomorrow to possibly re-zone our residential neighborhood to commercial I submit the following letter and past correspondence. When Commissioner Taylor was running for election she promised us that this would not happen. I am hoping that that promise will be kept! Golden Gate Master Plan. Keep the Estates Residential. Golden Gate Parkway. We have previously objected to the proposed changes in making the area between Livingston and Santa Barbara with ANY commercializations. We built our home in 1989 and unlike Pine Ridge Road there are too many private homes that feed onto the Parkway. Since exit 105 from 1-75 and the overpass was put in place it is almost impossible to get out of our street as it is, especially in season. We have already had over 3 fatalities at the end of our street and when I wrote to the County to request a light be put in place because of the gym and Bingo hall at the end of our street and the alterations to the other streets that have to utilize ours to make UTurns to head west it is a nightmare. The County flat out said "no, a stop light would cause more accidents". We have too many families with young children and children who are now learning to drive to be put in danger. Again, Golden Gate Estates was built for residential and it was well over 30 years ago. Too many families have taken stake in their properties and homes to be violated by commercialization. The investors who are attempting this change are not for the benefit of the residents...it's money for their pockets. The apartment complex that was just built on the corner of the Parkway and Livingston should prove to be another traffic nightmare. Subject: GG Parkway From: ajturner37@hotmail.com Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2014 19:37:33 -0400 To: fredcoyle@colliergov.net Commissioner Coyle, We, the residents off Golden Gate Parkway, recently received correspondence regarding a request to re-zone the one mile radius that impacts our home. I wanted to share the most recent correspondence from them and my response. I am afraid that many of our neighbors did not take into consideration the initial letter that was sent and have not read it. This is very disturbing that these people are trying to modify our existing peace and security. Would you please take the time to read their proposal and let us know if there is anyway they can actually achieve what they are asking for. Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 210 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 756 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 2 Thank you. Angela Turner Sent from my iPad Begin forwarded message: From: Angela Turner <ajturner37@hotmail.com> Date: June 4, 2014 at 7:25:06 PM EDT To: "edwinkoert@msn.com" <edwinkoert@msn.com> Subject: GG parkway Not liking this at all. Your proposing to use our street as a major road and a gas station. I need to know who on 68th Street SW responded to your initial letter. I already tried for a light, as I mentioned before, and the County flat out declined. Why would 68th Street SW want to allow the traffic and further dis-value to our homes, not to mention the safety of our children. Pine Ridge extension has all the stuff they need getting off I75. That part is hideous. We have a beautiful landscaped exit as it is, it doesn't need to be destroyed by adding anymore commerce to the frontage and making our homes less attractive. Closest gas stations are already good enough for those who choose not to use the Pine Ridge amenities. Why are you concentrating using 68th and 60th when you don't own any properties at the "proposed" sites for first modifications. Mr. Perrine is the realtor for the properties that were acquired and the owners, as well as the original company that purchased the parcels that Wildcat I and II, whom you are the trustee, now own, knew that these were residential. Why is he putting his on the market for 4 million and 2 million with a description that says "Possible commercial usage, ideal for gas station, church, retail shopping, etc". Why is he lying. Putting that out as a possibility is baiting a proposed buyer and misleading! Your initial mailing would have been thrown away but I had the time to actually open and read it. Maybe that is why you have not gotten the responses. I am certain that NO ONE on our street is going to go for these changes. Angela Turner Sent from my iPad Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 211 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 757 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 3 On Jun 3, 2014, at 4:36 PM, edwinkoert@msn.com wrote: To all who has responded: The purpose of our rezoning initiative is not to offend anyone, but to inform all of the property owners located within the GGPkwy geographic area of our activities to have the corridor rezoned to a commercial application. Believe me, your view "for or against" our rezoning activity does not offend me. Everyone has an opinion, and as such, yours, as-well-as your peers, is just as important and will be considered too. I am an old Florida Boy from youth - 7-years (the East coast - Hollywood / Ft. Lauderdale through high school 1958) My homestead address is now a retirement community off of I-75 Exit 240, known as Sun City Center. However, I, as-well-as Brent have two each 35-year old dogs in the hunt fronting GGPkwy, and as such, I am in the Naples area quite frequently. My specific properties are on the West side of I-75, fronting GGpkwy, one on the North side and one on the South side of GGPkwy. My foot prints in the Naples area goes back to the early sixties. To assist you on Brent and my thoughts, I am attaching two graphic diagrams. The diagrams include all of the properties fronting the East and West Side of I-75, including our suggested modifications. The PDF diagrams can be enlarged by increasing the zoom percent within the PDF. Also, attached a a letter containing our thoughts on the development of the area. You may wish to review them, or discard them. While reading the WORD document you may wish to have the diagrams available. We do make the information available to all. As each of you are aware, initially, I released 700- mailings. Currently, 16 of you have responded, and I thank you for your input. Sincerely, Edwin H. Koert 239-289-4420 edwinkoert@msn.com <GGPkwy - East Side of I-75.pdf> <GGPkwy - West Side of I-75.pdf> <GGPkwy -032414 - Hard look at the North and South Sides.doc> Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 212 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 758 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 5 Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 213 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 759 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 6 Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 214 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 760 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 7 Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 215 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 761 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 8 Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 216 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 762 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 1 From:vkeyes239@aol.com Sent:Thursday, June 02, 2016 6:34 PM To:VanLengenKris Subject:GGAMP I wish to make known my opposition to any changes to the Golden Gate Area Master Plan along Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. I oppose the commercialization of the parkway or apartments along the parkway. I am in favor of maintaining the "Estates" residential zoning which protects the quite, residential character of our neighborhood. Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 217 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 763 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 1 From:Jim Duffy <jim@jimduffyconstruction.com> Sent:Friday, October 28, 2016 10:59 AM To:GGAMPRestudy Subject:Western Golden Gate Estates Planning Study To Planning and Zoning Division, Regarding ongoing study of uses for Golden Gate Parkway from Santa Barbara Avenue to Livingston Ave: We request, to maintain rural character of this area, that existing zoning in this area remain in place as currently in effect and no additional commercial use be permitted. Thank you, Gloria L. Cooley James P. Duffy 2760 68th ST. SW Naples FL34105 239-272-6881 Cell Jamespduffy@comcast.net Right-click or tap and hold here to download pictures. To help protect your privacy, Outlook prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet. Avast logo This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 218 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 764 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 219 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 765 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper 12/19/2017 Page 220 of 220 9.A.3.j Packet Pg. 766 Attachment: Transmittal_Attchmnt_B_Data & Analysis/White Paper (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) RESOLUTION NO. 19- 2 4 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PROPOSING AMENDMENTS TO THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN, ORDINANCE 89-05, AS AMENDED, RELATING TO THE GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN RESTUDY AND SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN ELEMENT AND THE GOLDEN GATE AREA FUTURE LAND USE MAP AND MAP SERIES; CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT; FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT AND FUTURE LAND USE MAP AND MAP SERIES; THE SOLID WASTE SUB-ELEMENT OF THE PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT; STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SUB-ELEMENT OF THE PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT; AND TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT; AND FURTHERMORE DIRECTING TRANSMITTAL OF THE AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY. [PL201800002611 WHEREAS, Collier County, pursuant to Section 163.3161, et. seq., Florida Statutes, the Florida Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act of 1985, was required to prepare and adopt a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the Collier County Board of County Commissioners adopted the Collier County Growth Management Plan on January 10, 1989; and WHEREAS, the Community Planning Act of 2011 provides authority for local governments to amend their respective comprehensive plans and outlines certain procedures to amend adopted comprehensive plans; and WHEREAS, Collier County staff has prepared amendments relating to Affordable Housing to the following elements of its Growth Management Plan: Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element and Golden Gate Area Future Land Use Map and Map Series; Conservation and Coastal Management Element; Future Land Use Element and Future Land Use Map and Map Series; Solid Waste Sub-Element of the Public Facilities Element; Stormwater Management Sub-Element of the Public Facilities Element; and Transportation Element; and WHEREAS, on July 19, 2018, the Collier County Planning Commission considered the proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan pursuant to the authority granted to it by 18-CMP-01009/1464878/1]197 GGAMP Restudy Words underlined are additions;Words struelE-threugh are deletions. PL20180000261 are a break in text 3/11/19 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 767 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Section 163.3174, F.S., and has recommended approval of said amendment to the Board of County Commissioners; and WHEREAS, on February 12, 2019, the Board of County Commissioners at a public hearing approved the transmittal of the proposed amendment to the state land planning agency in accordance with Section 163.3184, F.S.; and WHEREAS, upon receipt of Collier County's proposed Growth Management Plan Amendment, various State agencies and the Department of Economic Opportunity (DEO) have thirty (30) days to review the proposed amendments and DEO must transmit, in writing, to Collier County its comments within said thirty (30) days pursuant to Section 163.3184, F.S.; and WHEREAS, Collier County, upon receipt of the written comments from DEO must adopt, adopt with changes or not adopt the proposed Growth Management Plan Amendment within one hundred and eighty (180) days of such receipt pursuant to Section 163.3184, F.S.; and WHEREAS, the DEO, within five (5) days of receipt of Collier County's adopted Growth Management Plan Amendment, must notify the County of any deficiencies of the Plan Amendment pursuant to Section 163.3184(3), F.S. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA that: The Board of County Commissioners hereby approves the proposed Growth Management Plan Amendment, attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated by reference herein, for the purpose of transmittal to the Department of Economic Opportunity and other reviewing agencies thereby initiating the required State evaluation of the Growth Management Plan Amendment prior to final adoption. THIS RESOLUTION ADOPTED after motion, second and majority vote this I ati day of F-4 Gt.r 2019. R BOARD OF UNTY COMMISSIONERS CRYYTAL Jf:.K)r G., CLERK COLLI R / tlf b•RID ' elPt' fid. 04 BY: f_ Am st moi' Attest A0 Chair y Clerk ham L. c g ante , Jr., V airman s lq raturentAprvecias to form and legality: H idi Ashton-Cicko Managing Assistant County Attorney Attachment: Exhibit"A"—Text amendments and map amendments 18-CMP-01009/1464878/1]197 GGAMP Restudy Words underlined are additions;Words struck ough are deletions. PL20180000261 are a break in text 3/11/19 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 768 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 EXHIBIT "A" To update and reorganized the current Golden Gate Area Master Plan, along with the title, heading and Future Land Use Map series. The full document is struck through, followed by the underlined reorganized Plan. GROWTH-MANAGEMENT-PLAN GOLDEN-GATE-AREA-MASTER-PLAN Prepared by Gempfelaenye Planning Section COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Adopted October 1997 Words underlined are added;words struck—through are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 1 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 769 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 SYMBOL DATE AMENDED ORDINANCE NO. May-9000 2000 25 ** May- 000 2000 26 *** I) May 9, 2000 2000 27 May 9, 2000 2000 28 113 tvlaY-972000 2000 29 IV) March 13, 2001 2001 12 V) May 14, 2002 2002 21 VI) September 10, 2003 2003 11 V14 December 16, 2003 2003 67 WII) October 26, 2001 2004 71 IX) June 7, 2005 2005 25 X) January 25, 2007 2007 19 Xy December 4, 2007 29976 XII)December 4, 2007 2007 77 XIII) December 4, 2007 2007 83 XIV) October 14, 2008 2008 55 XV)October 14, 2008 2008-66 XVI) October 14, 2008 2008 59 XVII) July 28, 2010 2010 31 XVIII) July 28, 2010 2010 32 XIX) September 14, 2011 2011 29 XX)January 9, 2013 2013 15 November-1-872444 2011 11 XXII) November 10, 2015 2015 62 XII) May 10, 2016 2016 12 XXIV) June 13, 2017 2017 23 a Indicates adopted portions Ordinance No. 2000 25 rescinded and repealed in its entirety Collier County Ordinance No. 98 0324GM). Words underlined are added;words strueli-thc-eusp are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 2 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 770 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 DOAH Case No. 98 0324GM), more specifically portions of the Intergovernmental e • ' . • - ; - - ---- - •- - . thc Golden Gate Arca Master Plan. The above Ordinance No. 2007 19 is based on the 2001 Evaluation and Appraisal Report EAR). The above Ordinance No. 2013 15 is based on the 2011 Evaluation and Appraisal Report EAR). Words underlined are added;words str-ueli-thfaugh are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 3 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 771 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 GOLDEN-GATE-AREA-MASTER-PLAN DATE AMENDED ORDINANCE NO. May 19, 1992 92 31 August 1, 1992 92 50 May 25, 1993 93 21 April 12, 1994 94 22 March 14, 1995 95 12 April 14, 1998 98 26 Septcmbcr 8, 1998 98 70 Fcbruary 23, 1999 99 17 Notc: All of the abovc amendments occurred after adoption of the Colden Gatc Area Master r r -- - _ • . -- - - - = - - - - -- - - --- - -- Words underlined are added;words are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 4 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 772 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 TABLE-OF-CONTENTS Page I. INTRODUCTION 1 II. OVERVIEW 2 A. County Widc Planning Proceso B. Golden Gate Area Planning Process Ill. IMPLEMENTATION SECTION 3 Goals, Objectives and Policies 3 Land Use Designation Description Section 13 1. Urban 13 2. Estates 21 3. Agricultural/Rural Settlement Area 15 4. Overlays and Special Features 15 LIST OF MAPS 46 Pine Ridge Road (CR 896) Interchange Activity Center and Pine Ridge Road Mixed Use Subdistrict Mission Subdistrict Estates Shopping Center Subdistrict Words underlined are added;words are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 5 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 773 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan-BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 1 2 As part of the revised Growth Management Plan, the County adopted the original Golden Gate 3 Area Master Plan (GGAMP)in 1991. The GGAMP was further revised in 1997. The Golden Gate 5 6 8 adoption of a Master Plan for Golden Gate, as a separate Element of the Collier County Growth 9 - -- ••"- - . -• - - ' - - - - : - •-- e. -_ ' - , •- . , - - - • 10 of the FLUE. All other Goals, Objectives, and Policies contained in the FLUE and all other 11 Elements of the Growth Management Plan remain applicable to the Golden Gate Area. In 12 ---• • .- -- - - -- - - - - _ - •: - - - : • 13 Future Land Use Map. 14 A 15 A e 16 -, - ---- -- " - - - -- -- " -. - _e - - 17 97-64-was-adopted, 18 19 _: - " -- - ' - - - - ' --- - - - . . •- _ .. 20 - - • -- - - - .- _-- : - s:: - - .: • - -- •--• --, -- • - - - - " - -- - 21 _. - - - •- -- - " -- 22 Master Plan Restudy Committee met on over twenty (20) occasions, between June 2001 and 23 . . •- !! - -- •: - -: - - - •-- _ - - - 24 -' -- - -- _ 25 attended. 26 27 28 -:-- - e - - - U. . _ _ - . - !!• •-• 29 . . - .., -- _ - e- - .., - e :•-_ 30 31 -- e . - 32 efforts. 33 The IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY places the Plan into effect. Strategics have been developed 34 - -:: _ - - - -- - •- -- • •_ , - • -- - • 36 Gate A.ea Fut ce- and U e Mae 37 -- _ _ "e .. _ _ 38 strategy, including the Goals, Objectives, and Policies. 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 Words underlined are added;words soh are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 6 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 774 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan-BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 1 11 -OVERVIEW 2 A. GLINAN DE PLANNING PROCESS 3 Pursuant to Section 163.3177(6), Florida Statutes, the Collier County Growth Management Plan 4 5 1. Future Land Use 6 2. Housing 7 3. Public Facilities 8 9 10 6. Capital Improvements 11 7. Transportation 12 8. Recreation and Open Space. 13 14 - - - - "" --- _ - --- -- -•- - _ - ••- - -- •- - - - .._ . . :_ •- - - ----- 16 - - - . :•-- - - - - - - 17 --•••-• - - - - - -- -- - - ---- - -- -- - " -- - 18 19 20 - -- _ 21 - - 22 23 -- - 1--C,, - - --- e : -- - - 24 a GOLDEN-ATi E ARCEA PLA NTNGPROCESS 26 _ -• - - -- - ,+- 27 reeds .ee.felle+W 28 29 30 31 33 __ ...•• - 34 37 - --- -- . .. - . -- -- - - - - •- - - ' 38 of the Restudy Committee, in 2003 and 2004. 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 Words underlined are added;words strucks are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 7 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 775 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 1 IN-IMPLEMENTATION-STRATEGY 2 3 - - ' - _ , - - ,_ - - - - -'- - - •- • -'" - - •- - - •- 4 GOALS, IOBECTIVESANDPOLICIS e _ r 6 e • - . I 9 RESIDE" 10 11 OBJECTIVE 1.1: 12 :- __ - _ 14 of this Element. 15 16 Policy 1.1.0.1: 17 -- _ _ - - '_ - -- " '— = 18 - - -- --• 19 20 Policy 1.1.0.2: 21 •' - - - _ •_ - - ' - - - - - - - ----- - - - - 23 24 Policy 1.1.0.3: 25 -- -- - -- 2 6 !. • 28 29 Policy 1.1.1: 30 -- - 31 Subs 32 A. URBAN MIXED USE DISTRICT 33 114rban- id 34 35 3. Downtown Center Commercial Subdistrict 36 B. URBAN COMMERCIAL DISTRICT 37 1. Activity Ccntcr Subdistrict 38 39 3. Santa Barbara Commercial Subdistrict 40 41 5. Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict 42 43 44 45 46 47 Words underlined are added;words are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 8 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 776 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 1 Policy 1.1.2: 2 The ESTATES Future Land Use Designation shall include Future Land Use Districts and3SuladistFiet".for 4 5 1. Residential Estates Subdistrict 6 7 3. Conditional Uses Subdistrict 8 4. Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict 9 5. Mission Subdistrict 10 6. Everglades Randall Subdistrict 11 B. ESTATES COMMERCIAL DISTRICT 12 1. Interchange Activity Ccntcr Subdistrict 13 2. Pine Ridge Road Mixed Use Subdistrict 14 15 4. Commercial Western Estates Infill Subdistrict 16 5. Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict 17 6. Estates Shopping Center Subdistrict 18 7. Southbrookc Office Subdistrict 19 20 Policy 1.1.3: 21 .' ' - - - 22 Land Use District: 23_A RURA SETTLEMENT AREA DISTRICT 24 25 Policy 1.1.4: 28 29 Policy 1.1.5: 31 •- _ -- -• - -- -- 32 33 Policy 1.1.6: 34 - -- -•- -- - - . . - - -- - - , - - -- - - • _ - .. . . _ _ , _ - _ -- 35 Zoning Appoals shallb„ a 36 39 - - •- - - - - - - - - - ----•- _ 41 __ • - - _ 42 43 •_', e - _ _- _• '-- - _ •- - - - - -- •--- - - -- - - • •. -- "- 45 --- 46 47 Words underlined are added;words straeli-thr-euel4 are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 9 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 777 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 1 2 3 4 • - - -- - .- _- - --- _ -- --- - - - - - -- - •- "- --- - - - - - _• - 6 countywide FLUE and on the Public School Facilities Element Map Series, and referenced in 7 9 _- -- _-- - - 11 - •- 12 __ " " --- -• •--• 13 _ 14 - -- -- - _- - - - . ' - - -- --- - - - - - - - . . - - 15 16 17 18 OBJECTIVE 19 20 21 Policy 1.2.1: 22 23 24 Management-Ran, 25 26 Policy 1.2.2: 27 •- -- --- 2 8 ••- -- - - -- _ - - -- - - •'•- -- -- - - -- . - 29 31 __ • -- • • - - - - 32 ' - - • - • --- - - - - 34 37 - -- - •- - -- -- - 38 39 carlicct posciblc time. 40 41 44 15 Policy 1.3.0.1: 46 '• -- 49 50 51 52 53 Words underlined are added;words str-us14414r-eug14 are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 10 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 778 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan-BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 1 Policy 1.3.1: 2 5 - - -- - -- - - - • - 6 7 10 11 12 Policy 1.4.0.1: 14 - -- - ' - - -- -- -- _ _ -•-- - - -- •-- - - ---- - - - 15 16 Policy 1.4.1: 17 -- --- 18 19 •- -- - - - - -- ... _ -- - - - - -- -- -- _ 20 21 22 23 GOAL-24 24 ' - 25 e r 26 e . - e e _ 27 28 le - - e _ 29 _ . _ - . e _ _ . e 30 - - - - - - - _ • - - _ e - . e - 31 32 34 AS . - e • 35 e _ e _ e . 36 - 37 38 39 OBJECTIVE-3A4 40 -- -- 41 42 43 44 46 • - - -- --- --- - ' - - -- - - -- - 47 design criteria established within the Estates Designation, Estates Mixed Ucc District, 48 ' ' - -- --- -- - - -- -- - - 49 50 51 52 53 Words underlined are added;words are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 11 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 779 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 1 GOAL 4: 2 4 5 6 7 OBJECTIVE-4714 9 10 11 Policy 4.0.1: 14 15 Policy 4.1.1: 18 fellewing4ssuesi 19 o; 20 21 1. Sidewalks 22 ii. Traffic calming measures 23 iii. Improved street lighting; 24 25 d) Crime reduction; 26 27 28 29 Policy 4.1.2: 31 - - - - - -- - -- --- -- - - - - •- - -- - 34 - - - -- - - -- - - - - - • 35 36 Policy 4.1.3: 38 -- -- - -- _ 39 this-Gewmatinity. 40 41 42 GOAL 5: 43 44 - • 45 - e r . _ - . . 46 - - e - r a . - _ . _ r - _ . e 47 48 49 50 51 Words underlined are added;words are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 12 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 780 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan-BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 1 OBJECTIVE 5.1: 2 3 4 Policy 5.1.1: 5 -- - • • -- - - - - 6 —- - - _. - 7 - - - - -- . •- . - •- - _--- - - - 8 standards: 9 a. If a streetlight or an area light is required, it shall be of the type specified 10 A - •- - - 11 such that direct rays do not pase property lines. Low pressure sodium lamps arc 12 13 1. Where required, the street lamp shall be of the high pressure sodium type and have a 14 cobra head with flat bottom" style or be fully shielded so that light is directed only 15 16 17 18 19 20 b. Whcrc lighting of recreational areas is required, such lighting shall be mounted so as to 21 22 that extends outside of the intended area. 2: 24 25 Gate Boulevards Neighborhood Center. 26 27 28 OBJECTIVE 5.2: 29 Balance the provision of public infrastructure with the need to preserve the rural character of 30 Golden Gate Estates. 31 32 Policy 5.2.1: 33 34 - - - -•- - - ••--• • - •- . - -- .. - _ 36 37 Policy 5.2.2: 38 •- -- --- 39 -- -- • -•- —- - • —- - 41 people to move about the Estates Area by means other than motorized vehicles. All grecnwayr, 42 43 •- - , --- 44 45 Policy 5.2.3: 47 _. - 49 50 Words underlined are added;words are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 13 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 781 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 2 commercial uses shall be permitted on properties abutting streets acceding Golden Gate 3 456 7 8 OBJECTIVE 5.3: 9 ' - • - -" - - •: : 10 11 Policy 5.3.0.1: 12 13 :. - •• - 14 - - - - - - - . •. - -- •-- . 15 16 Policy 5.3.1: 17 -- - - - - --- - -- - - - 18 19 Development Code. 20 21 Policy 5.3.2: 222 3 - • - - - - - : 24 25 26 GOAL 6: 27 • - A e _ , r • Si . r - 28 29 30 GOLDEN GATE AREA 31 32 OBJECTIVE 6.1: 33 34 36 37 Policy 6.1.1: 38 39 --- • - -- - - -• • : 40 41 b. The development of a north south connection from the eastern terminus of White 42 43 c. The development of a new east west roadway eroding the Estates Area south of Golden 44 45 46 Policy 6.1.2: 47 -- •_ -- 48 49 50 51 52 Words underlined are added;words st skE ough are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 14 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 782 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan-BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 1 OBJECTIVE 6.2: 2 4 5 6 Policy 6.2.1: 7 8 - - - - -- - - -- - -- - - - -- -"- -- _ - - . 9 10 Policy 6.2.2: 11 - - - - - - - - --- ' - - - -- 12 13 14 Policy 6.2.3: 15 _ _ 16 - - - - -- - - - --- - __ - -• _ . 17 18 19 OBJECTIVE 6.3: 21 Improvements within Golden Gate Estates and Golden Gate City to ensure that the access needs 23 24 Policy 6.3.1: 25 27 -- - - - - - _ -- _ . - --- 28 29 30 Policy 6.3.2: 31 -- -- --- 32 ' -- --•- - - - 33 34 35 36 GOAL 7: 37 e - - e - _ e - - r e 38 39 40 e . . e 41 42 OBJECTIVE 7.1: 44 ... - - - - -- --- - - ___ •-- • -- -- - _. - - -- - - - 45 P.• •. , - - - " " - -- -- - _ - - _ , - - - .. _ •- _ - • - - -" - -- " -- --- 46 Gate Arca regarding the moans to pceveFlt, prepacc - , - - ---- • -, - - - • - - - . 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 Words underlined are added;words are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 15 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 783 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan-BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 1 Policy 7.1.1: 2 The County, fire districts that serve the Golden Gate area, and other appropriate agencies, shall 4 need for prescribed burning on public lands in high risk fire areas. 5 6 Policy 7.1.2: 7 9 Colden Gatc Estates. 10 11 Policy 7.1.3: 12 13 shall evaluate the Land Development Code for Golden Gate Estates and shall eliminate any 14 '- - - ..-- 15 17 18 Polley 4s 19 20 Services shall hold one or more annual "open house" presentations in the Golden Gate Arca 22 management 23 24 25 OBJECTIVE 7.2: 26 Ensure that the needs of all applicable emergency services providers are included and 27 --- -• - - •- -- - - - -- - •- - -• - •- - -- -• - •- - - 28 Gate Arca. 29 30 Policy 7.2.1: 32 -- -" ' -- _ 33 - - - _ -- •- _ , - 35 designs arc consistent with the needs of these agencies. 36 37 Policy 7.2.2: 38 ' . •- _ -- -_ - - - - - • - ' - • _ . • _ - . - _ - _ . -- - - -- _ 39 40 42 for the public projects. 43 44 45 OBJECTIVE 7.3: 46 P. -- - •_ - - .- --- - - . - ' - ----._ . -'• • •- 47 _ -- -- _---- • - --- - - __ -- _ 49 50 51 52 53 Words underlined are added;words are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 16 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 784 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 2 -- -- _ --- _- - - - ..- - - - 3 -- - ' .. _ • _ -- - - - - .- -'. - , - - - .- - -- -- - - - . , - - _ - --- 5 purposes: 6 a. An 175 Interchange in the vicinity of Everglades Boulevard. 8 -. -_ _ - •_ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ __ _ -` 'Street, SW, between White Boulevard and Golden 9 Gate Boulevard. 10 11 Policy 7.3.2: 12 13 14 ---- - - - - - _ .- - -- • _ --- - .- - - - - - 15 16 Policy 7.3.3: 17 Modified portions of existing structures shall meet NFPA Standards through the adoption of 18 - -- -- - _ "- - - - - -- -- - _- - -- . 19 21 County owned property within Colden Gate Estates shall be subject to an active, on going 22 - _- -.._ . - - - - -- -- -- - -- - - • - • - - - - - - --- 23 properties. 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 Words underlined are added;words s#r±tsl eegh are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 17 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 785 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 2 3 4 - _ - - - - - 5 "- - • - --- - 7 i URBB AAI DESIGNATION: e . 11 projoctod to o future urban support facilitie- _ - - _- . 13 urns bo looatee within thorn. 14 -- --- -- - - -- '" - - 15 including 16 patterns of existing development, 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 - 24 -- 25 parks, open space and recreational use; 26 water dependent and water related uses; 27 child care centers; 28 community facilities such as churches, cemeteries, schools and school facilities co 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 treatment for all types of injuries and traumas, such as, Golden Gate Urgent Care. 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 Words underlined are added;words etfueli-threug14 are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 18 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 786 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan-BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 1 Group Housing shall be permitted within the Urban Mixed Use District and Urban Commercial 2 Districts subject to the definitions and regulations as outlined in the Collier County Land 3 9- -- •-- --- e - - e!, 6 Family Care Facility if occupied by not more than six (6) persons shall be permitted in 7 residential areas. 8 Group Care Facility, 9 Care Units, 10 Adult Congregate Living Facilities, and 11 Nursing Homes. 12 A.Ur-an "gid-Use-DictRct 13 - - 15 16 17 18 DENSITY RATINGSYSTEM: 19 a. BASE DENSITY Four (1) residential units per grow acre is the eligible density, though 20 not an entitlement. 21 b. DENSITY BONUSES Density bonuses arc discretionary, not entitlements, and arc 22 dependent upon meeting the criteria for each bonus provision and compatibility with 23 surrounding properties, as well as the rezone criteria in the Land Development Codc. 24 The following densities per grow acre may be added to the base density. In no case 25 shall the maximum permitted density exceed 16 residential dwelling units per grow acre. 26 27 28 29 e - - - 30 per acre may be added for every one (1) acre of commercial zoning that is 31 32 entire project. 33 ii. Proximity to Activity Ccntcr 34 36 As used in this density bonus provision, the term "affordable" shall be as defined in 37 Chapter 420.9071, F.S. To encourage the provision of affordable workforce housing 38 39 up to 8 residential units per grow acre may be added to the base density if the project 40 meets the requirements of the Affordable workforce Housing Density Bonus 41 e - •-e - - - • ! 42 43 44 Words underlined are added;words are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 19 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 787 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/C PSP-2018-2 1 e_ -- 2 3 4 5 6 and sewer service; compatible with surrounding land uses; has no common site 7 8 9 recidcntial density. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Add 1 dwelling unit if direct access to two or more arterial or collector roads as 17 identified in the Traffic Circulation Element. 18 19 around an Activity Ccntcr shall be measured by the radial distance from the center of the 2021 22 24 25 26 27 1 -- _ --. _ _ • - •. _ ----- 28 2930 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 busing ownership. The provisions of this Subdistrict arc intended to ensure harmonious 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 Words underlined are added;words are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 20 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 788 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan-BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 2 3 4 ccrvc the needs of residents within the Subdistrict, surrounding neighborhoods, and 5 6 7 8 after the effective date of the adoption of this Subdistrict. This regulation does not require the 9 removal of residential units located on Golden Gate Parkway that arc converted to uses 10 11 12 A. All development or redevelopment within the boundaries of the Downtown Center 13 14 15 16 17 18 5. Enhanced strectscaping. 19 6. Project interconnections, where possible and feasible. 20 21 22 23 be restricted in an implementing zoning overlay district, and except as may be 24 beleks 25 1. Those uses permitted by right within the C 1, C 2 and C 3 Zoning Districts, as 26 27 28 2. Residential uses permitted by right in the existing residential zoning districts in this 29 S istrict. 30 3. Those permitted uses that may be allowed in an implementing zoning overlay 31 district. 32 33 1. Those conditional uses allowed within the C 1, C 2 and C 3 Zoning Districts, as 34 35 GGAMP; 36 2. Those conditional uses allowed, by the LDC in effect on the date of adoption of 3738 S strict; 39 40 district; and, 41 a --- - 42 D. Prohibited uses in this Subdistrict are as follows: 43 44 e, - _ - - - --- - 45 goods or services. 46 47 48 Words underlined are added;words stfueli-thfeugh are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 21 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 789 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan-BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/C PSP-2018-2 1 3. Enameling, painting or plating as a primary use. However, these uses arc 2 3 4 kitchens or homelcsc shelters. 5 6 E. For multi story buildings: 7 8 9 10 3. Only residential uses are allowed on the third floor. 11 12 13 14 15 16 2. A minimum of 1 Y. parking spaces for each residential unit. 17 18 19 5. Shared parking is required, where poscible and feasible. 20 B. Urban Co... mercial isstr''ict 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2930 31 323 3 3435 36 37 develop at a density of up to 16 residential units per gross acre. This density may be 38 39 40 41 42 o - _ - --- - - 43 Due to the existing zoning and land use pattern in proximity to the Commercial In fill 45 46 47 Words underlined are added;words stFueli-tlaceugh are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 22 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 790 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan-BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 1 a) Commercial uses shall be limited to: 2 Low intensity commercial uses that arc compatible with both residential and 3 4 5 Intermediate commercial to provide for a wider variety of goods and services in 6 areas that have a higher degree of automobile traffic. These uses shall be similar 7 8 e - - -- ' '- - --- - '- - -- _' .. 9 10 11 12 13 14 c) Projects within this Subdistrict shall make provisions for shared parking 15 16 d) Driveways and curb cuts for projects within this Subdistrict shall be consolidated 17 18 e) Access to projects shall not be permitted from Collier Boulevard. 19 20 21 22 23 see Santa Barbara Commercial Subdistrict Map). The intent of the Santa Barbara 24 Commercial Subdistrict is to provide Golden Gate City with an area that is primarily 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 This Subdistrict is intended to promote commercial and institutional development 35 opportunities. Therefore, is order to reduce the potential conflicts that may result from 36 37 38 39 40 year. The requirement to cease existing residential uses does not apply to owner occupied 41 woll.,n nice 42 43 44 45 46 Words underlined are added;words stein are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 23 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 791 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 1 Within one year of the effective date of the adoption of the revised Subdistrict boundaries, the 2 Land Development Code shall be amended to provide specific uses and development 3 standards to implement the revised Subdistrict. These shall include, but not necessarily be 4 limited to: 5 1. Landscaping and buffering requirements. 6 7 3. Architectural design standards. 8 9 10 11 possible. 12 13 7. A minimum project size of one acre. 14 8. Encouragement of submittal of proposed development in the form of a PUD Zoning 15 District. 16 17 properties. 18 10. Signage restrictions. 19 11. Building height limitation of two stories, not to exceed a maximum of 35 feet. 20 21 22 23 e - -- ..._ .'. 24 25 26 has--twe-pt fpoces: 2728 29 The uses permitted within this district are generally low intensity, office development, 30 31 32 33 A. For projects contained wholly within the original Professional Office Commercial 34 Subdistrict with a minimum depth of 150 fact as measured from the property lino 35 36 permitted: 37 1. Apparel and accessory stores. 38 2. Auto and home supply stores (Auto accessory dealers retail, automobile parts 39 40 41 42 43 44 rooms). Words underlined are added;words stfueli-tlaceogli are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 24 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 792 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 1 2 1. Food stores (except Convenience Food stores retail, grocery stores and 3 eupermarkets). 4 5. Cencral merchandise stores. 5 6. Home furniture, furnishing, and cquipmcnt stores. 6 7. Libraries. 7 o-- _ 8 9 9. -M scellaneousrota k 10 10. Paint, glass, and wallpaper stores. 11 11. Personal services (except coin operated laundries, beauty shops and 12 barbershops) 13 12. United States Postal Service. 14 B. Properties that qualify under item A, above, will be subject to the following: 15 16 17 with the exceptions noted above. Item A.2, above, shall be consistent with the LDC uses 18 19 e : - -- 20 21 22 23 Any property line of the subject parcel that is immediately adjacent to single family 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 signage- 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 This Subdistrict includes properties zoned RMF 12, C 4, and C 5. This Subdistrict will allow 38 39 40 parking. 41 42 43 44 Words underlined are added;words mkt are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 25 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 793 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan-BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 1 2 3 1. Provisions for bicycle and pedestrian travel. 4 2. An emphasis on building aesthcticc. 56 7 8 9 6. Enhanccd streetscaping. 10 11 8. Quality designs for building facades, including lighting, uniform signage and 12 landscaping. 13 Z.-ESTATES-DESIGNATION 15 opportunities for othcr land uses. Typical lots arc 2.25 acres in size. However, thcrc are some- 17 one unit per 2.25 gross acres, or one unit per legal non conforming lot of record, exclusive of 18 - - -- - • - - - - ••• - 19 ••- - - - -- - - - , - - - - - - - - ,. - - - -- -- - 1- 2020 Generally,the Estates Designation also accommodates future non residential uses, including: 21 Conditional uses and essential services as defined in the Land Development Codc, 22 except as prohibited in the Neighborhood Center Subdistrict. Also, refer to tho 23 Conditional Uses Subdistrict. 24 Parks, open space and recreational uses. 25 Group Housing shall be permitted subject to the definitions and regulations as outlined in 26 the Collier County Land Development Codc (Ordinance No. 01 11, adopted June 22, 27 2004, effective October 18, 2004) and consistent with locational requirements in Florida 28 29 Schools and school facilities in the Estates Designation north of 175, and where feasible 30 and mutually acceptable, co locate schools with other public facilities, such as parks, 31 libraries and community centers to the extent possible. 32 - --- - -- • - • - - - -- - - • - 33 Family Carc Facility if occupied by not more than six (6) persons shall be permitted in 34 recielential 35 Group Carc Facility, 36 Carc Units, 37 A -- -- - -- - • • - -- • •- - - 38 Nursing Homes. 39 All of the above uses shall be consistent with all of the Goals, Objectives and Policies of tho 40 41 42 43 Words underlined are added;words ugh are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 26 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 794 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan-BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 1 2 states Mixed Uco District 3 6 7 of guesthouses. 9 10 11 12 13 a) The Collier County Land Development Code shall be amended to provide rural 14 15 Centers. 16 b) Locations 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Wilson Boulevard and Golden Gate Boulevard Center. 25 This center consists of three quadrants at the intersection of Wilson and Golden 26 27 28 29 is approximately 8.'15 acres. The parcels within the NE quadrant shall be 30 31 32 and Golden Gate Boulevards is 7.15 acres, allows 5.00 acres of commercial 33 34 35 36 Estates. 37 Collier Boulevard and Pine Ridge Road Center. 38 39 the intersection. Tracts 109 114, Unit 26, Golden Gate Estates arc included in this 40 41 Road Center Map). The E1/2 of Tract 107, Unit 26 is also included within this 42 43 Everglades Boulevard and Golden Gate Boulevard Center. 44 45 46 47 48 Words underlined are added;words are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 27 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 795 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 1 2 and consists of Tract 1, Unit 77 of Golden Gate Estates. The SE quadrant of the 3 Center is approximately 5.16 acres in size and consists of Tract 97, Unit 81 of 4 5 in size and consists of Tract 128, Unit 76 of Golden Gate Estates. The SW 6 7 96, Unit 81 of Golden Gate Estates. 8 The Immokalce Road and Everglades Boulevard Center is located in the 9 10 of three Tracts: Tract 128, Unit 17, is 5.15 + acres and is located within the 11 southwest quadrant of the Center, south of the fire station; and,Tracts 113 and 16, 12 Unit 16, arc 4.05 +acres and 5.15 + acres respectively, and arc within the 13 southeast quadrant of the Ccntcr, cast of the fire station. 14 c) Criteria for land uses at the centers arc as follows: 15 16 a wider variety of goods and services in areas that have a higher degree of 17 automobile traffic. These uses shall be similar to C 1, C 2, or C 3 zoning districts 18 outlined in the Collier County Land Development Code (Ordinance No. 04 41, 19 adopted June 22, 2001, effective October 18, 2004), except as prohibited below. 20 The Neighborhood Center located at the intersection of Pine Ridge Road and 21 Collier Boulevard may be developed at 100% commercial and must provide 22 internal circulation. Any rezoning is encouraged to be in the form of a PUD. This 23 Neighborhood Center may also be utilized for single family residential or 24 25 26 Parcels immediately adjacent to commercial zoning within the Neighborhood 27 28 29 30 31 Master Plan Element. 32 33 34 35 36 develeps: 37 e -- __ ---- - - ._ •- 38 39 40 41 whenever possible. 42 43 44 opening 45 46 47 48 Words underlined are added;words stfueli-thfei4gh are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 28 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 796 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 1 Projects shall provide a 25 foot wide landscape buffer abutting the external 2 3 4 5 year. A minimum of 50% of the 25 foot wide buffer area shall be comprised of a 6 7 8 buffer requirement; other existing native vegetation shall be retained, where 9 possible, to aid in achieving this buffer requirement. Water retention/detention. 10 11 12 external outfall. 13 For Tract 111, Colden Gate Estates, Unit 26, access shall be restricted to 1144 14 15 16 All buildings shall have tile roefs, 'Old Style Florida' metal roofs, or decorative 17 18 colors, except for decorative trim. 19 Building heights shall be limited to one (1) story, with a maximum height of thirty 20 five (35)feet. This provision only applies east of Collier Boulevard. 21 All lighting facilities shall be architecturally designed, and shall be limited to a 22 height of twenty five (25) feet. Such lighting facilities shall be shielded from 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 utilize a common architectural theme. This theme shall be applicable to both 30 31 32 33 34 35 the drive through areas shall be architecturally integrated with the rest of the 36 37 Fences or walls may be constructed on the commercial side of the required 38 landscape buffer between adjacent commercial and residential uses. If 39 40 41 42 Projects directly abutting residential property (property zoned E Estates and 43 44 75)feet wide buffer in which no parking uses are permitted. Twenty five (25) 45 46 47 48 Words underlined are added;words ugh are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 29 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 797 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 1 feet of the width of the buffer aleng the developed area shall be a landscape buffer. 2 3 5 of a perimeter berm and be used for water management detention. Any newly 6 constructed berm shall be revegetated to meet subsection 3.9.5.5.6 of the LDC 7 8 10 11 12 unlet' it is proven that such would have no adverse impact to the existing 13 v 14 b. If the project requires permitting by the South Florida Water Management 15 District, the project shall provide a letter or official document from the District 16 17 18 19 20 c. If the project is reviewed by Collier County, the County engineer shall provide 21 22 23 Projects within the Neighborhood Center Subdistrict that arc submitted as 24 25 space shall be developed as green space within a pedestrian accessible 26 27 28 The following principal permitted uses are prohibited within Neighborhood 29 6enters 30 31 Mail Order Houses (5961) 32 33 Power Laundries (7211) 34 3 5 e, • 36 37 39 69) 41 82223 42 Libraries (8231) 43 44 Waste-Management-R.544 45 46 The following additional restrictions and standards apply to Tract 124 and the 47 48 49 50 Words underlined are added;words ugh are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 30 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 798 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan-BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 1 a. Commercial uses shall be limited to the following: 2 3 2. medical related uses, such as a wellnesC center. 4 5 6 1. no lee, than sixty percent (60%) of the grow, square footage shall be 7 8 9 e - - 10 co as to allow 100 percent medical office use. 11 1 2 13 14 15 end. 16 3. C di`i_nal U_es Subdistrict 17 18 19 20 a) E;sential Services Conditional Lice Provisions: 21 Those Essential Services Conditional Uses, as identified within Section 2.01.03 G. of 22 23 24 defined as: 25 26 effluent tanks, 27 major rc pump stations, 28 29 hospitals and hospices, 30 31 governmental facilities (except for those Permitted Uses identified in Section 32 2.01.03 of the Land Development Code), 33 34 35 b) Golden Gate Parkway and Collier Boulevard Special Provisions: 36 Conditional uses shall not be permitted on those parcels immediately adjacent to 37 38 39 40 subparagraph 2., below; and, except for essential services, as described in 41 paragraph a), above. 42 43 44 45 Words underlined are added;words ugh are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 31 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 799 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan-BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 1 2 3 4 5 Barbara Boulevard, except as permitted within the Golden Gate Parkway 6 7 as provided in subparagraph 1., below; and, except for essential services, as 8 9 Further, no properties abutting streets accessing Golden Gate Parkway, between 10 1112 Subdistrict; and, except as provided in subparagraph 1., below; and, except for 13 essential services, as described in paragraph a), above. This provision shall not 14 15 1. In consideration of the improvements associated with the interchange at 16 17 18 and 66th Street S.W. may be expanded in acreage and intensity along the 19 south side of Golden Gate Parkway to the east of 66t4 Strcct S.W., but the 20 total project area shall not exceed approximately 9.22 acres (sec Golden 21 22 23 5, - - - .. -- 24 25 26 3. Conditional use for expansion of the existing educational and charitable social 27 28 and the west 150 feet of Tract 82, Unit 30,Golden Gate Estates. The maximum u 30 31 32 33 c) Neighborhood Center Transitional Conditional Use Provisions: 34 35 36 1. Properties eligible for conditional uses shall abut the arterial or collector road 37 38 39 both residential and commercial such as churches, social or fraternal 40 41 42 43 44 45 arc permitted, 46 47 48 49 50 Words underlined are added;words ugh are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 32 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 800 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 2 shall, whenever possible, share parking areas, acceac and curb cuts with the 3 4 d) Transitional Conditional Uses: 5 6 7 8 9 10 aroac. 11 12 Site shall be directly adjacent to a non residential use (zoned or developed); 13 14 not exceed 5 acres; 15 Conditional uses shall be located on the allowable acreage adjacent to the 16 non residential use; 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Project shall provide adequate buffering from adjacent properties allowing 24 residential uses. 25 c) Special Exceptions to Conditional Use Locational Criteria: 2. 27 28 29 31 Code, Ordinance No. 04 11, as amended. Such conditional uses shall not be 32 33 34 2. Conditional Use permits for excavation, as provided for in the Estates zoning 35 36 37 3. Conditional Use for a church or place of worship, as provided for in the Estates 38 39 4. Conditional Use for a church or place of worship as allowed in the Estates 40 6. 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 Words underlined are added;words otfue Hreugh are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 33 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 801 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan-BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Subdictrtc 12 13 b. Group care facilities (Categories I and ll) 14 c. Nursing homes and ascisted living facilities accociated with the David Lawrence 15 Center. 1617 18 19 20 21 Church of God. 22 23 5• Mission Subdistrict 24 25 26 27 28 a) Churches. 29 b) Child care centers must be not for profit and affiliated with a church within the 30 ictr-iet. 31 32 ictrict- 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 o -e •- -• -- 41 42 a zoned height of 35 feet. Development in this Subdistrict shall be designed to be compatible 43 44 45 46 47 Words underlined are added;words mh are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 34 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 802 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan-BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/C PSP-2018-2 2 3 4 5—6. lades Randall Subdistrict 1•R7TiVQiTVQAQ v-..v- 6 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 a) Day care centers 15 b) Private School& 16 c) Soup kitchens 17 d) Homele= shelters 18 19 20 such as steeples may be a maximum height of 60 feet. 21 22f-theemen ohall be pr, d.P' 23 25 26 27 28 29 e 30 31 Center are subject to the County wide FLUE and not this Master Plan. See Activity Center 32 33 34 35 3 7 -- - -- - - - , - --, - _ - - . - - _-- , -- _-, - -- - - - -- - 3 8 -- _ --- 39 -- • - - - - -• - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - _ -- _ -- - -- 40 residential areas within a convenient travel distance and to provide commercial services 41 - -- -- •- - --- - - - - -- - - --- - • - - -- ' - - - - - -- 43 44 45 46 47 Words underlined are added;words mah are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 35 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 803 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 1 portion of this property, which includes a portion of Tract 28 and a portion of Tract 13. A 2 3 4 as of the effective date of the adoption of this Subdistrict [Ordinance No. 03 01, adopted 5 January 16, 2003], are permitted within the western 10.52 acres of this property. The C 3 6 uses arc not an entitlement. Such uses will be further evaluated at the time of rezoning 7 8 10 11 12 Thcrc shall be no access onto Livingston Woods Lane. 13 Shared access shall be encouraged. 14 Building heights shall not exceed 35 feet. 15 There shall be a minimum setback area of 75 feet along the northern property line. 16 17 18 located closer than 30 feet to this line. 19 20 permitted 21 22 23 24 25 the intersection. 26 27 this Subdistric4 28 29 30 31 z , _ _ - 32 from 8th - -- 33 cc--•- . -- - - 34 35 36 37 38 A - _. .-- • - --- -- - - - - -- _ .. - - - '. 39 b. Projects directly abutting Estates zoned property shall provide, at a minimum, a 75 40 41 uses arc permitted; except that, when abutting conditional uses no such buffer is 42 required. 43 44 45 46 Words underlined are added;words strums are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 36 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 804 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan-BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 1 d. Tract 55 shall only be utilized for native preservation and water management areas. 2 3 4 5 1. Limitation of Uses Uces shall be limited to the following: 6 Automobile Service Station; 7 Barber& Beauty Shops; 8 Convenience Stores; 9 Drug Stores; 10 Food Markets; 11 Hardware Stores; 12 Laundries Self Service Only; 13 Parks, Public or Private; 14 Post Offices and Professional Offices; 15 16 17 All Permitted Uses of the C 2, Convenience Commercial, zoning district in the 18 e _ . .. - - - - _ 19 April 14, 2009; and, 20 21 f. The following limitations shall apply to Tracts 72, 89, 90, 107, 108, 125, 126, 127, 22 and Tract 54: 23 1. Development intensity on Tracts 72, 89, 90, 107, 108, 125, 126, 127 and the west 24 one half of Tract 51 shall be limited to 360,950 square feet of floor area, of which 25 no more than 285,950 square feet shall be retail development. 26 27 28 29 30 with a minimum of 35,000 square feet of gross leasable floor arca, prior to any 31 32 development. 33 34 35 36 Ordinance No. 2010 32, adopted July 28, 2010], except that the following uses 37 shall be prohibited• 38 Tire Dealers,Automotive Retail (Group 5531) 39 40 41 Drinking Places (Group 5813) 42 43 44 Words underlined are added;words str-ueli-thfeugh are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 37 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 805 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan-BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 1 Fishing Piers (Group 7999) 2 Glass and Glazing work (Group 1793) 3 Health Services (Groups 8059 8069) 4 5 Houseboat Rental, Lakes Operations, Party and Pleasure Boat rental (Group 6 7999) 7 Large Appliance repair service (Group 7623) 8 Marinas (Group 1193 and 4499) 9 Miscellaneous Repair Services (Groups 7622 7641, 7699) 10 Liquor Store, unless operated by a Grocery Retailer(Group 5921) 11 Used Merchandise Store (Group 5932) 12 13 14 15 Chopolc ( fro,,n 7709) 16 j , _- - - c. - , _• : 17 Bookmakers, Cable lifts, Carnival Operation, Circus Companies, Fortune 18 c:- - •: 19 20 7999) 21 Parole offices, Probation offices, Public welfare centers, refugee services, 22 settlement houses (Group 8322) 23 Tow in parking lots (Groups 7511, 7515, 7521) 2425 5. At time of rezoning, consideration shall be given to imposing appropriate 26 27 28 Division of Forestry fire tower uses. 29 A _-• :• : - - - e: 30 31 7. Excluding the commercial zening on Tract 71 and the existing approved 32 33 34 35 36 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 5.1, or if traffic conditions change in such a manner that adequate capacity is 45 available, 46 47 Words underlined are added;words are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 38 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 806 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 2 4 5 6 7 8 10 11 a) Sizc and Location: 12 The Subdistrict includes a 6.23 acre parcel, located at the southwest corner of 13 14 15 b) Permitted Uses and Development Intensity: 16 Within the subject property, 3.93 acres of office/medical use is permitted with a 17 18 19 a -- - - - - 20 21 permitted whether by right or by conditional use, within the C 1 zoning district, as 22 23 effective date of the adoption of this Subdistrict [Ordinance No. 03 01, adopted 24 January 16, 2003]. 25 c) Development Standards: 26 27 e- _. •- - .-.`. - -- - - - -- - - 28 29 30 residential aromas. 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 3839 40 41 42 be 25 feet in width and shall conform to the vegetative requirements of a Type"B" 43 44 e - - •-- • =- = ---- -- - 45 16, 2003]. 46 47 48 49 50 Words underlined are added;words stfueli-thr-eugh are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 39 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 807 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan-BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 1 5. A loop road shall be constructed, internal to the subject property. This road 2 3 Boulevard, so as to provide an alternative to use of the intersection. 4 5 6 7 structures through the treatment of rooflines and other architectural 8 embellishments. 9 7. No development of property within the Subdistrict shall commence until the 10 11 12 13 14 1516 17 18 19 20 a) Commercial uses shall be limited to: 2122 23 personal needs, and 24 25 26 27 Code (Ordinance 91 102), adopted October 30, 19f91. 28 e- - __ •-- -- - 29 be no minimum acreage requirement for PUD rezones except for the requirement that 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 c) Access to projects shall not be permitted from Collier Boulevard. 38 39 40 Barbara Boulevard right of way, shall be subject to the following additional 41 42 1. The site shall be limited to thirty five thousand (35,000)square feet of building 43 arca. 44 45 46 47 48 Words underlined are added;words strusk eugh are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 40 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 808 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan-BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 1 3. All principal structures shall be required to have a minimum setback of ono 2 hundred (100)feet from the project's northern boundary. 3 1. The northern seventy five (75)feet of the western sixty(60) percent of the site 4 shall be a green area (open space area). It shall be utilized for only water 5 6 5. The western sixty (60) percent of the site shall have an outdoor pedestrian 8 incorporate a minimum of: benches or seating areas for at least twelve (12) 9 10 11 o - -- - - - -- - 12 13 14 15 16 be provided along the western sixty (60) percent of the project's northern 17 18 these buffers along the project's western and northern boundaries. These 19 20 21 22 height of seven (7)feet and be a minimum of ninety five (95) percent opaque. 23 24 25 coratiyo tr m 26 27 35)feet. 28 29 30 residential land uses. 31 32 33 34 35 on the Golden Gate Arm Future Land Use Map. 36 37 m _ -- , - - - - - •- - - - - - - - -- e -- - -- 38 A - !_ - - 39 40 41 42 43 44 County. 45 46 47 48 Words underlined are added;words stFuelc-thr-eugh are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 41 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 809 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 1 2 3 1. Amusement and recreation 4 5 6 7999 Amusement and recreation services, not elsewhere classified, 7 8 9 10 11 5621 Women's clothing stores 12 13 5641 Children's and infants'wear stores 14 5651 Family clothing stores 15 5661 Shoc stores 16 17 18 Groups 5531 Auto and home supply stores 19 4. Automotive repair, services and parking (No outdoor repair/service. All 20 21 Groups 7511 Passenger car rental 22 23 24 5251 Hardware stores 25 26 6. Business services 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 e, 34 35 36 3 7 38 39 7371 Computer programming services 40 73-72-14epaskaged-SaftWare 41 7373 Computer integrated systems design 42 43 cervices 44 45 46 Words underlined are added;words o#Nsk-thfebigh are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 42 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 810 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 1 7375 Information retrieval cervices 2 7376 Computer facilities management services 3 7379 Computer related services, not elsewhere classified 4 7382 Security systems services 5 7383 News syndicates 6 7 8 7. Communications 9 10 1811 Cable and other pay television services 11 8. Construction, special trade contractors (office use only, no on site materials or 12 equipment storage) 13 Groups 1711 Plumbing, heating and air conditioning 14 15 1731 Electrical work industry 16 1741 Masonry, stone setting, and other stone work 17 18 19 1751 Carpentry work 20 1752 Floor laying and other floor work, not elsewhere classified 21 industry 22 23 24 1781 Water well drilling industry 25 1791 Structural steel erection 26 27 28 29 30 31 o Depository instit,tions 32 33 6022 ate eemmereial banks cc vrrnrr--r. 34 35 36 37 6061 Credit unions, federally chartered 38 39 40 41 classified 42 43 44 45 46 Words underlined are added;words str-uolc-thr-eugh are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 43 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 811 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 1 2 Groups 8711 Enginccring services 3 8712 Architectural services 4 8713 Surveying services 5 1 6 8741 Management services 7 8742 Management consulting cervices 8 8743 Public relations services 9 8748 Business consulting services, not elsewhere classified 10 12. Executive, legislative, and general government, except finance 11 Croups 9111 Executive offices 12 9121 Legislative bodies 13 14 9199 Ceneral government, not elsewhere classified 15 13. Food stores 16 17 18 5131 Fruit and vegetable markets 19 20 5451 Dairy products stores 21 5161 Retail bakeries 22 23 24 4.4,Genefel-merohandice etorec 25 Groups 5311 Department stores 26 5331 Variety stores 27 5399 Miscellaneous general merchandise stores 28 29 Groups 5712 Furniture stores 30 5713 Floor covering stores 31 5711 Drapery, curtain, and upholstery stores 32 5719 Miscellaneous home furnishings stores 33 34 5731 Radio, television, and consumer electronics stores 35 36 37 38 16. Insurance carriers 39 Groups 6311 Lifc insurance 40 6321 Accident and health insurance 41 42 6331 Fire, marine, and casualty insurance 43 44 45 Words underlined are added;words stFuek-thfeugh are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 44 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 812 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 1 6351 Surcty insurance 2 6361 Title insurance 3 6371 Pension, health and welfare funds 4 5 6411 Insurance agents 6 17. Justice, public order and safety 7 Groups 9221 Police protection 8 9222 Legal counsel and prosecution 9 9229 Public order and safety, not elsewhere classified 10 11 19. Miscellaneous retail (no adult oriented sales) 12 Groups 5912 Drug stores and proprietary stores 13 5921 Liquor stores (accessory to grocery or pharmacy only) 14 5932 Used merchandise stores 15 16 5942 Book stores 17 5943 Stationery stores 18 5944 Jewelry stores, including repair 19 20 21 5917 Gift, novelty, and souvenir shops 22 23 5919 Sewing, needlework, and piece goods stores 24 5992 Florists 25 5993 Tobacco stores and stands 26 27 5995 Optical goods stores 28 29 gravestone, tombstones, auction rooms, monuments, 30 31 32 333435 36 37 6163 Loan brokers 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 Words underlined are added;words are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 45 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 813 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan-BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 1 22. Personal cervices 2 Groups 7212 Garment pressing, and agents for laundries and drycicancrs 3 7221 Photographic studios, portrait 4 7231 Beauty shops 5 7241 Barber shops 6 7251 Shoe repair chops and shoeshine parlors 7 7291 Tax return preparation services 8 7299 Miscellaneous personal cervices, not elsewhere classified, 910 11 12 24. Real Estate 13 e - - - - - - --" -- - 14 15 16 6515 Operators of residential mobile home sites 17 6517 Lessors of railroad property 18 6519 Lessors of real property, not elsewhere classified 19 20 6511 Title abstract offices 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 6282 Investment advice 28 29 not„lcowhore oloccifiod 30 27. Social services 31 32 only) 33 8351 Child day care services 34 28. Travel agencies (Group 4724) 3536 keffReling-) 37 38 39 41 by the process outlined in the LDC. 42 43 44 45 46 Words underlined are added;words struck-through are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 46 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 814 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan-BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 1 b. Accessory Uses: 2 3 4 5 enclosed 6 b. Essential service facilities 7 C. Cazcbos, statuary and other architectural futures 8 9 must be enclosed) 10 11 C. Operational Standards 12 1. Outdoor music is prohibited 13 14 d. The following uses shall be prohibited: 15 16 those uses expressly listed above in a.1 arc permitted) 17 18 3. Business Services 19 20 7331 Direct mail advertising services 21 22 23 6. Educational services 24 Groups 8211 Elementary and secondary schools 25 8221 Colleges, universities, and professional schools 26 8222 Junior colleges and technical institutes 27 8231 Libraries 28 7. Health services 29 30 31 32 8. nes oollaneouc Retail 33 Gfeup6 592-1storos 34 5961 Catalog and mail order houses 3536 9. Personal services 37 Groups 7211 Power Laundries, family and commercial 38 7261 Funeral service and crematories 39 10. Social services 40 41 centers 42 8361 Residential care, including soup kitchens and homeless 43 shelters 44 Words underlined are added;words stfasli-thfeuel4 are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 47 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 815 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan-BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 1 c. Development intensity shall be limited to 190,000 square feet of grow leasable floor 2 arca. 3 f. No commercial use shall exceed fifteen thousand (15,000) square feet, cxcept for a 45 6 7 cquarc feet in size. 8 9 building with inline etoroc. 10 11 12 timeframes: 13 14 15 16 2. The owner will pay its fair share for the intersection improvements at Wilson 17 Boulevard and Golden Gate Boulevard within 90 days of County request for 18 reimbursement. 19 3. Until the intersection improvements at Golden Gate Boulevard and Wilson 20 21 CO) for more than 100,000 square feet of development. The applicant must 22 obtain a C.O. for a grocery store as part of this 100,000 square feet, and tho 23 grocery store must be the first C.O. obtained. 24 1. Rezoning is encouraged to be in the form of a Planned Unit Development (PUD), and 25 the rezone ordinance must contain development standards to ensure that all 26 27 28 29 30 requirements for retained native vegetation, including but not limited to the 31 requirements of Policy 6.1.1 of the CCME. A more detailed development plan must 32 be developed and utilized for the required PUD rezoning. 33 34 35 36 37 metir - 38 39 40 41 ee' - 42 43 44 45 46 Words underlined are added;words etr-ueli-thaaugh are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 48 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 816 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan-BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 1 A -- - - -- - -- - - - -- - - •--- - - ---- - --- - -- 2 4 chall provide a minimum 20' wide buffer in which no parking uses arc 5 6 7 8 subsection 3.05.07.H of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC). The 9 10 11 to meet subsection 3.05.07.H of the LDC (native vegetation replanting 12 A .- - - •- - - - : -- •- - - - -- - - - _ -- 13 14 foil 15 a. There shall be no adverse impacts to the native vegetation being retained. The 16 17 18 fetation. 19 b. If the project requires permitting by the South Florida Water Management 20 2122 23 24 chall not be used for water management. 25 c. If the project is reviewed by Collier County, the developer's engineer shall 2627 28 29 30 -- --- - -- - = - - - --• • - -- - •- - - • - - -- - - : • --- - - -- - •••. - 31 1/4 mile cast of Oakes Boulevard on the south side of Immokalec Road. he intent of the 32 subdistrict is to permit general office, medical office, and businese service uses generally 34 e . _ _• •_ . 35 36 ` __ •-- • .•- -- ----• • • _ --- -- - - - - - - - - 37 - - - - - •.. - - '-• _- - - - - , - -- --- •-- - - - - • -- - - --- - - 38 - - -- - A . ... - - - -- - -- ---- - - - -- ._ • - - - ..•. 39 A --• -• - 40 ._..e 41 1_.ane, which shall consist of retained native vegetation. Accese to the Subdistrict shall only be 42 from Immokalec Roan 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 Words underlined are added;words otruok-through are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 49 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 817 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan-BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 1 3 Rural Settlement Area District 4 5 6 and 1970. In settlement of a lawsuit pertaining to the permitted uses of this property, this property 7 has been "vested"for the types of land uses specified in that certain "PUD" by Settlement Zoning 9 dated the 27 -- - - -- • 10 11 .:•-: - - -- e - - -- _ ' - - e - - _ - - - - - _ ! - •- -- 13 -- -- - - 14 15 By designation in the Growth Management Plan and the Golden Gate Area Master Plan acs 1'7 - - - -•, • - -- -- - _ - 18 19 course, open space and recreational, and essential services. 20 2 1 --- -- _ -'. 22 vested status. The geographic expansion of the Settlement Are to additional lands outside the 23 • • -- - - - - •- -, •, - - - A, - - - -- •- - , - - - - _ --- -, - -_ 24 26 - - - -- - -- 29 Southern Golden Gate Estates is identified as a Natural Resource Protection Area (NRPA) 30 Overlay on the Golden Gate Arca Future Land Use Map and is subject to the NRPA Overlay 31 provisions of the FLUE. 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 Words underlined are added;words are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 50 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 818 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 FUTURE LAND USE MAP SERIES Golden Gate Arca Future Land Use Map Pine Ridge Road Interchange Activity Center and Pine Ridge Road Mission Subdistrict Estates Shopping Center Subdistrict Estates Shopping Ccntcr Subdistrict Conceptual Plan Everglades Randall Subdistrict Southbrooke Office Subdistrict Words underlined are added;words stf- eugh are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 51 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 819 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) LEGEND 1 URBAN DESIGNATION ESTATES DESIGNATION AGRICULTURAL/RURAL DESIGNATION USE DISTRICT USE DISTRICT RRA.SE TLEMEN AREA BISTRO- R N RE=ID NnAL S RDIBTRI T o`°ESIDENTIA.ESTATES BDBD,E RIBT OVERLAYS AND GOLDEN GATE AR A r ry• SI,RESIDENTIAL SUBDISTRICT ONAL uses SuBDISTRICT ISSPPECIAL FEATURES oxN CENTER cDMMERc.AL sueDISTRc N IDneoanoo''cw A SMeDIsmlcT IJ v SOuatE cRortcTlou AVER DVERur L COM AEo"sE A STRICT sNTsu sumsrs, ; I== 1o° aols E RIGT 19 B '' FUTURE LAND US M A P i I° LD ILL sDDDIRTR,D IAL SUBDISTRICT •=w l.;DISTRICT--- tDENS TY, inSANTA BARBARA Co E E' M AL SDBD TRILT w •"„o LASEELEVEN',N,HE P., R,G COLLIER BOULEVARD COMMER L ScoDISRmr PwE RIDGE ROA''M.ree LASE su°DISTRmT IMMOKA E ROAD RANDALL BOULEVARD COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT O TNI a RI T ESTATES CO Iry I rAl T CC"''''L 0 iENT_R SueD4; imSOuwBROONE OFFICE SUBDISTRCT NOTE THIS MAP CANNOT BE IN.RPRETED WITIOUT THE GO S.OBJECTVES POLICIES AND AND USE DESIGNATION DESCRIPTION SECTION Or ME...DEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN CO r4 cca, OIL WELL ROAD E. O IMMOKALEE ROAD N. z RANDALL BOULEVARD SUBJECT Q33 SITE a 3EPSP-2013-11 .> a VANDERBILT I m BEACH ROAD 1J d W M U DOLT N GATE dg :.ULEVARD Z 0U U PINE RIDGE. RD. o WHITE BLVD. 0C m o a a Z 2amaW E G.G.PKWY. . O 6 4aOt, 0' WAz INTERST E W AT yg S.R. :4 2 IX 1 2 IQ DAVIS BOULEVARD m S.R.84 p a ,__, z a am x W 41 LC G7 S. E, i 3 I CO. 94f o FE I M I U GOLDEN GAT FUTURE LAND US-MAP ADOPTED - FEBRUART.1991 A RED - DECEMBER 4,tom ! ORO.NO.2007-A p AMENDED - MAY 19,1992 - - C AMENDED - OCTOBER 14,2000 AMENDED - MAT 25,1993 ORD.N0.2008-59 AMENDED - JUL0 27,?993 , AMENDED NC.- JV2010} tLY 26 2010 1111 a URC. a U2 AMENDED APR.L 12 1994 AMENDED - JULY 26 2010 T-1 AMENDED MARCH+4 19•. ORD.LA0.2010 32 LrJ AMENDED - SEPTEMBER 14 2011 I AMENDED - OCTOBER 27 1997 ORD.N0.2011-29 p E. AMENDED - APRIL 14 1998 AMENDED - NOVEMBER 16,2014 F ORD.N0.20'4-41 I O AMENDED'ED SEPTE=ER 8.1998 W AMENDED- oN2015-6 10.2015 p AMENDED ARCH I3.2001 END. -201E1627 021 FEB•ARV 23.1999 AMENDED - A 9,2000 AMENDED o.201,23)01723) t]Ob.No.2c1)-23) AMENDED - AMENDED MAY t4,2002 AMENDED - SEPTEMBER 10 2003 SC ALE O..NO.2003-44 AME E 2 'OBER 26,2004ORDoNO. - 0 1 MI. 2 M'.. 3 MI4 MI. 5 MI. E VAR"25,2005 RD NO-2005-3 PREPARED BY: GIS/CAD MAPPING SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT AMENDED - ANUARY 25,2007 ORD.NO J 2007-19 DATE: 1/20'6 "_E: CPSP-201}-I!-1.DWG R26E R27E 1 R28E 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 820 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2GOLDENGATEPARKWAYPROFESSIONALOFFICECOMMERCIALSUBDISTRICTCollierCounty, FloridaCORONADOPARKWAY232221202010 viz• t9 la ] u u u u 1ilii 13WIgliolv25T11AVENUES.W. 1 2 WINNDIXIEMIN111111191a1] 1a to to 13eIM0 2 Q 11}ell 4 a 6 iIV n PARKWAY 'v..v a 1 •U s] PLAZAe© 25TH CT.S • itiii w II' s 't % '1 $\RO, wo10, 1111 l® 2a 2 1 2411.105..4100,4eP12 Po ST.ELIZABETH SETON B GP o 3Q 2• q n 282 Ts, P `Nair `q,1®'(+ CHOURCH 8 SCHOOL BBANK G p''''n4Ck'S; 6 N --_ ee ®s m9 5 0 e ry B 10 v 1211 to 13 a© 9 P J 6 n 19 1a riag,:ik,0•40:4; iv4P-74y1W eta e 'O GOLDEN GATE 3 t3 a 9 F a©e©5; ®®..1. 41T\S```\` ````®®Aik IAIDDLE SCHOOL is e0 0440 ' \\ ' • 2 N, to 322 ©©®©® 41, 4446,; #11lii 0 P ®`® . . NA, 40, 4.4, 40T6 v. ti 4,41"7:©© ® 14 io, •, •irooriTia SANTA BARBARA Q`- 40"h,, 11411101,, 1h°kAi-l„O4MMM1I AaiillnmilEeinsl Ip ® . 4s4.10, M,,,w. V,P'® 510 SQUARE lk GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY P,WO e4 N MRau TH PLACE S.W. A1 oe®©©P SAPPHIRE LAKE © 29®© vI 111 29TH PLACE S.W. p F 2 CZ 19 H-_ 20 i7/ CM m ST.JOHNNANSCHOOL® LI Elmiam Vi 3 It 5i . 1: I SI li A 11 ion 1.1111 W tidk . 2 _ tigitl I! Ij 011111©O 9, a MIN 31STAVENUESW31ST AVENUESWIIIII, 3 a©-- a© 31ST PLACE S.W. S 29 315T PLACE S.W. v l0 to ] Is t to 1] 13 2 1 a 2 ” 1 2 3 • S 8, a 9 10 13 ht 2 3 • a 9 ] a I 3 • t3 18 10 10 13 2] 211 20 24 23 T 20 19 to 19 1B i] 198 14 f3 12 22 I 1113 20 9 2 29Y]21 a 30 11 32ND AVENUE S.W 32ND AVENUE S.W. 11/1"'1 23 22 21 20 I9 1B 1] 111 to 1• 1 02 tt 10 9 6 ] 8 a a 3 2 1 22 Zt 20 18 18 D 18 1S 14 13 All 10 9 a 7 6 5 • 3 GOLDEN GATE CANAL AMENDED — JANUARY 25, 2005 Ord. No. 2005-03) AMENDED — JUNE 7, 2005 LEGEND Ord. No. 2005-25) AMENDED — OCTOBER 14, 2008 PROF Ord. No. 2008-59) OFFICEESSIONAL P'EPARED BY: GRAPHICS AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT SECTION SCALE SUBDISTRICT OMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION I I 1 I I FILE: CPSP-2004-7F-2008-1.DWG DATE: 10/2008 0 200FT 400FT - 03/08/2019 Page 53 of 1709.A.3.kPacket Pg. 821Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) m0-cimommKmC>c DG7 _ mKm0N<NaDNn..,0>aOOi° NTH STREET S.W.. I1ZN0>> Yl-/ee IIISUNSHINE0o$e a2z0NSHiNE80UL£VARD xa:OZ 3rIa O z!n I I,//4/ I 48TH TERRACE SW. E O r m w5 ,'•. • •. "/I I f ..,• I1111, 7 Toxia, ,... „,,,, ... i -/i. , ri. ii No111filifil f - .-% , 1 1 III I. 111111111KM111/111 II/%/I"/ . E IN TERRACE S. Ia z5u) all. t Ai v,7/AAm''ird''o 1111 1111 Mile I' / NTH STREET sW. 45TH ST.S.W. I/ Foramina's.044p,4,r ms's. /, / I i / M `111 11111111[u1110111110 „ . -/%/E. NTH TERRACE S.W. i,% 7/ NIMMy// MIN TERRACE S.W. . 4 4 ii/i it'atm f . 11111111111111o - iiia Fir 'atm ai , . 11 11i11t/Ir.** 00.!- /41% %'A Wo"i ;O 44TH STREET S.W. DIIIISIIIIIIIIIIITREET j// lop , ,..., ,..„. i% 11111111111x p, o Jose. h y 11 lirmrib 4 n 4-7a."''."--- or g.. .. 4 1 P3, ri Wow r I MM Mill .3 ,ER.sw 4 C O m m 4 ,E i % ! y 7 T v k/_/f ..?E.. IMM. 8E I gsa ' am sTliE, !// I% i . e. .O. IIMM E ax+o sT sw n A 1111 11 D, /. sii m 11i%// //.%/i .. .. g F7 a tom^ m k'sz 6. ERRACE sw fes// 'WA.nom. A vl c 9g p m -6,d i/7/, E ti ti 0O1: NM,..,SW. /03,70, 42ND STREET S.W. F3 o; 0 § I ¢ 0 I 1 [ 1 1 1 1 I I 11 I 1 I NO NO Z O O g4 i SUNRISE CANAL mA < oA 0, rli I I I I I I I l l l l l y vN N a N!415T TERRACE SW.z Nil%/ rCST STREET SW. 1W> o MMMMnMIM'MNMNINL ci® Illj 111R11118 MOM N COWER BOULEVARD - C.R.-951 O CANAL ttl k N " J 39TH STREET SW. 02 t,y 0 4Nb NJaz5I0n CE g CD b F E N 4. N O O_ O ON 9.A.3.kPacket Pg. 822Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan-BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CP;f2018 2 URBAN MIXED USE ACTIVITY CENTER GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY AND CORONADO PARKWAY COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA n 1 i , L T c in JLL j Lik,„ E::::::Pi ,,,, Jaor, ... 14 i Ia p 41 Eillillyilii N JT 1_ 1r[ in 1__ __ 1 IhIIIiopE L_______,..._..____.A I___) Illi_ c___ ___ i IL O I it,i 4/ 1\ I wile k\s\ . IL 1 /+CO 4.00 AMENDED - J• IUARY 25, 2005 l I ` Ord. .. 2005-3) l ( lI I AMENDED JANUARY 25, 2007 l Il Or.. No. 2007-19) AMEND D — OCTOBER 14, 2008 Ord. No. 2008-59) URBAN MIXED USE ACTIMTY CENTS- GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY AND CORONADO PA' WAY LEGEND ACTIVITY REPARED BY: GRAPHICS AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT SECTION SCALE CENTER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION I I 1 BOUNDARIES FILE: CPSS-2004-1B-2008-1.DWG DATE: 10/2008 5 500E7 1000FT 03/08/2019 Page 55 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 823 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element EXHIBIT"A" COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN ELEMENT Prepared by Collier County Zoning Division Prepared for COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Adopted (date) i Words underlined are added;words stack-through are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 56 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 824 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan-BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/C PSP-2018-2 Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element AMENDMENTS TO COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN -prior to 2019 GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN DATE AMENDED ORDINANCE NO. May 9, 2000 2000-25 ** May 9, 2000 2000-26 *** May 9, 2000 2000-27 May 9, 2000 2000-28 May 9, 2000 2000-29 March 13, 2001 2001-12 May 14, 2002 2002-24 September 10, 2003 2003-44 December 16, 2003 2003-67 October 26, 2004 2004-71 June 7, 2005 2005-25 January 25, 2007 2007-19 December 4, 2007 2007-76 December 4, 2007 2007-77 December 4, 2007 2007-83 October 14, 2008 2008-55 October 14, 2008 2008-56 October 14, 2008 2008-59 July 28, 2010 2010-31 July 28, 2010 2010-32 September 14, 2011 2011-29 January 9, 2013 2013-15 November 18, 2014 2014-41 November 10, 2015 2015-62 May 10, 2016 2016-12 June 13, 2017 2017-23 Indicates adopted portions Ordinance No. 2000-25 rescinded and repealed in its entirety Collier County Ordinance No. 99-63, which had the effect of rescinding certain EAR-based (1996 EAR) objectives and policies at issue in Administration Commission Case No. ACC-99-02 (DOAH Case No. 98-0324GM). Ordinance No. 2000-26 amended Ordinance No. 89-05, as amended, the Collier County Growth Management Plan, having the effect of rescinding certain EAR-based (1996 EAR) objectives and policies at issue in Administration Commission Case No. ACC-99-02 DOAH Case No. 98-0324GM), more specifically portions of the Intergovernmental Coordination Element(Ord. No. 98-56), Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge (Ord. No. 97-59) and Drainage (Ord. No. 97-61) sub-elements of the Public Facilities Element, Housing Element (Ord. No. 97-63), Golden Gate Area Master Plan (Ord. No. 97-64), Conservation and Coastal Management Element (Ord. No. 97-66), and the Future Land ii Words underlined are added;words stuelc-tlweugh are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 57 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 825 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element Use Element and Future Land Use Map (Ord. No. 97-67); and readopting Policy 2.2.3 of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan. The above Ordinance No. 2007-19 is based on the 2004 Evaluation and Appraisal Report EAR). The above Ordinance No. 2013-15 is based on the 2011 Evaluation and Appraisal Report EAR). AMENDMENTS TO COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN —prior to 2000 GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN DATE AMENDED ORDINANCE NO. May 19, 1992 92-34 August 4, 1992 92-50 May 25, 1993 93-24 April 12, 1994 94-22 March 14, 1995 95-12 April 14, 1998 98-26 September 8, 1998 98-70 February 23, 1999 99-17 Note: All of the above amendments occurred after adoption of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan in 1991 (Ord. No. 91-15) and prior to adoption of amendments on , 2019 Due to the restructuring of this Element in 2019 to create three Sub-Elements, these amendments are no longer denoted on the pages of the Element with Roman numeral symbols that provide informational citations to adopted documents recorded in the Official Records of Collier County. Words underlined are added;words staelk-threutgh are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 58 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 826 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. INTRODUCTION 1 II. OVERVIEW 2 A. County-Wide Planning Process B. Golden Gate Area Planning Process III. MAPS 4 Original Golden Gate Area Master Plan Study Areas iv Words underlined are added;words stuelE4lifough are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 59 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 827 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element I. INTRODUCTION As part of the revised Growth Management Plan, the County adopted the original Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP)in 1991. The GGAMP was further revised in 1997. The Golden Gate Area Master Plan provides growth management regulations for the designated Golden Gate Area see Original Golden Gate Area Master Plan Study Areas Map). The Golden Gate Area was previously subject to the regulations outlined in the County's Future Land Use Element (FLUE). However, in 1991, the unique characteristics of the area resulted in adoption of a Master Plan for Golden Gate, as a separate Element of the Collier County Growth Management Plan. This Master Plan superseded former Objective 1, Policy 1.1, and Policy 1.3 of the FLUE. All other Goals, Objectives, and Policies contained in the FLUE and all other Elements of the Growth Management Plan remain applicable to the Golden Gate Area. In addition, the Golden Gate Area Future Land Use Map will be used instead of the County-Wide Future Land Use Map. In April 1996, the Board of County Commissioners adopted the Evaluation and Appraisal Report EAR) for Collier County. As a result of the recommendations made in the EAR, Ordinance 91- 15,which adopted the original Golden Gate Area Master Plan,was repealed and a new Ordinance 97-64 was adopted. In February of 2001, the Board of County Commissioners directed staff to initiate a restudy of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan. Accordingly, in June of 2001, Comprehensive Planning Section Staff requested that the Board appoint an advisory committee, consisting of residents of Golden Gate City and Golden Gate Estates, to aid Staff in the restudy process. The Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy Committee met on over twenty (20) occasions, between June 2001 and June 2003, to consider proposed amendments to the GGAMP, as well as other matters related to the Golden Gate Area. All meetings were open to the public; many of these meetings were well attended. The restudy process was divided into two phases. The County transmitted Phase I amendments to the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA) in April 2003. These amendments were adopted, as Ordinance 2003-44, in September 2003. Phase II amendments were transmitted in June 2004. The Phase II amendments were adopted in October 2004, as Ordinance 2004-71. In February 2015, the Board of County Commissioners directed staff to initiate another restudy of the GGAMP. Staff evaluated the Golden Gate Area within 3 distinct areas: 1) Golden Gate City, 2) Rural Golden Gate Estates, defined as Golden Gate Estates east of Collier Boulevard; and 3) Urban Golden Gate Estates, defined as Golden Gate Estates west of Collier Boulevard. Guided by an Oversight Committee, staff conducted eight public workshops along with electronic outreach to gather resident and stakeholder opinions. Most fundamentally, the vision statements created by consensus within the sub-areas of the Golden Gate Area are as follows: Golden Gate City Vision Statement: Golden Gate City is a safe, diverse, family-oriented community that offers easy access to education, parks, shopping and services within a vibrant, walkable community. 1 Words underlined are added;words stuek-through are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 60 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 828 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element Rural Golden Gate Estates Vision Statement: The Golden Gate Rural Estates is an interconnected, low-density residential community with limited goods and services in neighborhood centers, defined by rural character with appreciation for nature and quiet surroundings. Urban Golden Gate Estates Vision Statement: Golden Gate Urban Estates is a low-density, large-lot residential neighborhood in a natural setting with convenient access to the coastal area. Implementation strategies have been developed to address land use, public facilities, transportation, rural character, emergency management and natural resources. The Goals, Objectives and Policies, Land Use Designation Descriptions and Maps are implemented as separate sub-elements for three distinct areas: 1. Golden Gate City Master Plan Sub-Element; 2. Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element; and 3. Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element. REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] 2 Words underlined are added;words stuel ottgh are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 61 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 829 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element II. OVERVIEW A. COUNTY-WIDE PLANNING PROCESS Pursuant to Section 163.3177(6), Florida Statutes, the Collier County Growth Management Plan shall contain the following elements: 1. Future Land Use 2. Housing 3. Public Facilities 4. Conservation and Coastal Management (Coastal Counties only) 5. Intergovernmental Coordination 6. Capital Improvements 7. Transportation 8. Recreation and Open Space In addition to the above Elements, local government comprehensive plans in Florida may, by decision of the local legislative body, contain one or more optional elements. Optional elements are required to comply with certain general criteria under Section 163.3177, Florida Statutes, but are not subject to specific requirements (with some exceptions). In 1991, the Board of County-Commissioners chose the option of adopting the Golden Gate Area Master Plan, in recognition of the unique characteristics of the Golden Gate Area. In addition to establishing the Collier County Growth Management Plan's mandatory structure, Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, also subjects the Plan to a mandatory evaluation process every seven (7)years. This process involves the preparation of an Evaluation and Appraisal Review EAR) to determine whether, and to what extent, the existing Growth Management Plan has carried out its stated Goals, Objectives and Policies. B. GOLDEN GATE AREA PLANNING PROCESS Objective 4 of the Collier County Future Land Use Element (FLUE) allows the countywide planning process to"address specific geographic or issue areas." Policy 4.1 of this Objective reads as follows: A detailed Master Plan for Golden Gate Estates has been developed and was incorporated into this Growth Management Plan in February 1991. The Master Plan addresses Natural Resources, Future Land Use, Water Management, Public Facilities and other considerations." In February 1991,the Board of County Commissioners adopted the original Golden Gate Area Master Plan. The original Master Plan incorporated the recommendations of a Citizens Steering Committee. A revised and updated Master Plan was adopted in 1997, pursuant to recommendations of the County's 1996 Evaluation and Appraisal Report. In 2001, the Board of County Commissioners established the Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy Committee and directed Staff to work with the Committee to further revise and update the Master Plan. The Board of County Commissioners adopted revisions to the GGAMP, incorporating the recommendations of the Restudy Committee, in 2003 and 2004. 3 Words underlined are added;words stueletlifeugh are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 62 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 830 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element III. Maps Original Golden Gate Area Master Plan Study Areas 4 Words underlined are added;words stttek4hreugk are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 63 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 831 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/C PSP-2018-2 Added word "Original". No other changes. Original GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN STUDY AREAS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA HENDRY CO. COLLIER CO. STUDY AREA AMTh IMMOKALEE LAKE TRAFFORD C.R. 846 J 4i; LEE CO. COLLIER CO. map/ C.R. 846 n dr,"..„. A i A 0 m e A A 0 CA, A ITY 41: S.R. 84 I —75 NAPLES— +lam Ill F) If iii 11 V NG f 46/ u o m GS 0N vi A 1)x. 114 MARCO lei_4 v ISLAND o 4q 4ayr ., ' i` i .0,4. EVERGLADES AMENDED— OCTOBER 26.2004 r CITY Ord.No.2004-71 j yTj SCALE AMENDED — OCTOBER 14, 2008 9.`3. r''r 1 i 1 Ord.No.2008-59) Q 1, O 5M1. 10ML 0 Q CHOK•.OS:E PREPARED BY GRAPHICS AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT SECTION n{X' COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION FILE. GGMP-98-2008-1.DWG DATE 10/2008 03/08/2019 Page 64 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 832 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 Golden Gate City Sub-Element 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN 9 10 GOLDEN GATE CITY SUB-ELEMENT 11 12 13 Prepared by 14 Collier County Zoning Division 15 16 Prepared for 17 COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 18 Adopted (date) 19 20 21 22 Words underlined are added;words stuelf-reugh are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 65 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 833 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 Golden Gate City Sub-Element 1 2 AMENDMENTS TO COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN 3 GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN: GOLDEN GATE CITY SUB-ELEMENT 4 5 DATE AMENDED ORDINANCE NO. 6 date), 2019 2019-(#) 7 8 9 ii Words underlined are added;words steek-41ifeugh are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 66 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 834 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 Golden Gate City Sub-Element 1 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 3 Page 4 5 A. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES 1 6 7 B. LAND USE DESIGNATION DESCRIPTION SECTION 6 8 1. URBAN DESIGNATION 6 9 A. Urban— Mixed Use District 6 10 1. Urban Residential Subdistrict 11 2. High Density Residential Subdistrict 12 3. Downtown Center Commercial Subdistrict 13 B. Urban —Commercial District 9 14 1. Mixed Use Activity Center Subdistrict 15 2. Golden Gate Urban Commercial Infill Subdistrict 16 3. Santa Barbara Commercial Subdistrict 17 4. Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict 18 19 C. LIST OF MAPS 12 20 Golden Gate City Future Land Use Map 21 High Density Residential Subdistrict 1989 Boundaries of Activity Centers 22 Downtown Center Commercial Subdistrict 23 Urban Mixed Use Activity Centers Golden Gate Parkway and Coronado Parkway 24 Golden Gate Urban Commercial Infill Subdistrict and Golden Gate Estates 25 Commercial Infill Subdistrict 26 Santa Barbara Commercial Subdistrict 27 Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict Words underlined are added;words stuek-through are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 67 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 835 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 Golden Gate City Sub-Element A. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES GOAL 1: TO GUIDE LAND USE AND PUBLIC FACILITY DECISION MAKING AND TO BALANCE THE NEED TO PROVIDE BASIC SERVICES WITH NATURAL RESOURCE CONCERNS THROUGH A WELL PLANNED MIX OF COMPATIBLE LAND USES WHICH ENSURE THE HEALTH, SAFETY, WELFARE, AND QUALITY OF LIFE OF THE LOCAL RESIDENTS. OBJECTIVE 1.1: Develop new or revised uses of land consistent with designations outlined on the Golden Gate City Future Land Use Map and provisions found in the Land Use Designation Description Section of this Sub-Element. Policy 1.1.1: The Policies under the above Obiective shall identify the Future Land Use Designations, Districts, and Subdistricts for Golden Gate City. Policy 1.1.2: The Land Use Designation Description Section of this Sub-Element shall provide the standards and permitted uses for Golden Gate City Future Land Use Districts and Subdistricts. Policy 1.1.3: The Golden Gate City Future Land Use Map and companion Future Land Use Designations, Districts, and Subdistricts shall be binding on all development orders unless otherwise permitted in this Master Plan effective with the adoption of this Master Plan. Policy 1.1.4: The URBAN Future Land Use Designation shall include Future Land Use Districts and Subdistricts for: A. URBAN —MIXED USE DISTRICT 1. Urban Residential Subdistrict 2. High Density Residential Subdistrict 3. Downtown Center Commercial Subdistrict B. URBAN —COMMERCIAL DISTRICT 1. Mixed Use Activity Center Subdistrict 2. Golden Gate Urban Commercial Infill Subdistrict 3. Santa Barbara Commercial Subdistrict 4. Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict Policy 1.1.5: No development orders shall be issued inconsistent with the Golden Gate City Sub-Element with the exception of those unimproved properties granted a positive determination through the Zoning Re-evaluation Program and identified on the Future Land Use Map Series as properties consistent by Policy and those development orders issued pursuant to conditional uses and rezones approved based on the County-Wide Future Land Use Element (adopted January 10, 1989, Ordinance 89-05)which was in effect at the time of approval. Any subsequent development orders shall also be reviewed for consistency with the Growth Management Plan based on the County-Wide Future Land Use Element. 1 Words underlined are added;words stueletlifeugh are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 68 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 836 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/C PSP-2018-2 Golden Gate City Sub-Element Policy 1.1.6: The sites containing existing public educational plants and ancillary plants, and the undeveloped sites owned by the Collier County School Board for future public educational plants and ancillary plants, within the GGAMP area, are depicted on the Future Land Use Map Series in the countywide FLUE and on the Public School Facilities Element Map Series, and referenced in FLUE Policy 5.14 and Intergovernmental Coordination Element Policy 1.2.6. All of these sites are subject to the general Interlocal Agreement, adopted on May 15, 2003 by the Collier County School Board and on May 27, 2003 by the Board of County Commissioners, and as subsequently amended and restated,with an effective date of December 2008, and subject to the implementing land development regulations to be adopted. OBJECTIVE 1.2: Ensure public facilities are provided at an acceptable level of service. Policy 1.2.1: Requests for new uses of land shall be subject to level of service standards and concurrency requirements for public facilities as outlined in the Capital Improvement Element of the Growth Management Plan. OBJECTIVE 1.3: Protect and preserve the valuable natural resources within Golden Gate City. Policy 1.3.1: The County shall protect and preserve natural resources within Golden Gate City in accordance with the Objectives and Policies contained within Goals 6 and 7 of the Collier County Conservation and Coastal Management Element(CCME). Policy 1.3.2: Collier County shall coordinate its planning and permitting activities within Golden Gate City with all other applicable environmental planning, permitting and regulatory agencies to ensure that all Federal, State and local natural resource protection regulations are being enforced. OBJECTIVE 1.4: Provide a living environment within Golden Gate City, which is aesthetically acceptable and protects the quality of life. Policy 1.4.1: Collier County shall provide a living environment that is aesthetically acceptable and protects the quality of life through the enforcement of applicable codes and laws. Policy 1.4.2: The County's Code Enforcement Board shall strictly enforce the Land Development Code and other applicable codes and laws to control the illegal storage of machinery,vehicles and junk, and the illegal operation of commercial activities within Golden Gate City. GOAL 2: TO PRESERVE AND ENHANCE A MIX OF RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL LAND USES WITHIN GOLDEN GATE CITY THAT CREATES A SAFE, DIVERSE AND VIBRANT WALKABLE COMMUNTY CONSISTENT WITH THE STATED VISION OF GOLDEN GATE CITY. 2 Words underlined are added;words stuelchrough are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 69 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 837 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 Golden Gate City Sub-Element OBJECTIVE 2.1: Provide for residential and commercial land uses that meet the needs of Golden Gate City and the surrounding area. Policy 2.1.1: Development and redevelopment within Golden Gate City shall be guided by the residential and commercial needs consistent with the stated vision of Golden Gate City. Policy 2.1.2: The County shall protect established stable neighborhoods and provide opportunity for redevelopment and renewal through development standards and practices that promote compatibility. Policy 2.1.3 Within two years, Collier County shall create development standards to guide the transformation of Golden Gate Parkway and the Activity Center into destinations that are convenient, pleasant and safe for pedestrians and cyclists, and maintain strong connections to transit service. Policy 2.1.4 The Activity Center shall allow uses intended to strengthen the economic health of Golden Gate City. Policy 2.1.5 Collier County shall discourage new land uses along Golden Gate Parkway and within the Activity Center that impede pedestrian activity and are solely auto-oriented, such as car washes, storage facilities, auto dealerships and drive throughs. Land development regulations will be established within two years to ensure compatibility of auto-oriented uses within the pedestrian environment. Policy 2.1.6 Residential land use designations shall support the diversity of housing types within Golden Gate City. Policy 2.1.7: Collier County shall respond to community-initiated planning programs as they may occur. Community planning programs may take into consideration the following issues: A. Affordable housing based upon home ownership; B. Commercial re-vitalization, to include: i. Sidewalks ii. Traffic calming measures iii. Improved street lighting; C. Neighborhood parks, open space and recreational centers; D. Crime reduction; E. Consistent enforcement of land development regulations; and, F. Improved lighting for streets and parking areas. OBJECTIVE 2.2: Strengthen the quality of life in Golden Gate City and the surrounding area,and promote a healthy economy through support of redevelopment and renewal in Golden Gate City with focus along Golden Gate Parkway and within the designated Activity Center. 3 Words underlined are added;words s *k-through are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 70 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 838 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 Golden Gate City Sub-Element Policy 2.2.1 Collier County shall consider the use of redevelopment tools such as tax increment financing. Policy 2.2.2 Within two years of adoption, Collier County shall initiate a community renewal plan to include economic development strategies, urban design schemes, and infrastructure improvements. Renewal plans shall be in concert with the vision of Golden Gate City and promote vibrant urbanism, improve aesthetics and support walkability. Policy 2.2.3 Within two years of adoption, Collier County shall initiate the involvement of Golden Gate City residents and business owners to consider amendments to the Land Development Code to support and implement residential and commercial redevelopment and renewal initiatives. Amendments shall include incentives for remodeling and renovation by creating criteria and standards for variances and/or deviations. Policy 2.2.4 In collaboration with the Golden Gate City residents and business owners, and other community partners such as the Greater Naples Chamber of Commerce, Collier County shall initiate a branding and marketing plan for Golden Gate City within two years of adoption. The proposed plan shall be in concert with the overall vision for Golden Gate City. Policy 2.2.5 Collier County will work to ensure pertinent economic incentive programs are made available to those seeking business creation and redevelopment opportunities. OBJECTIVE 2.3 Ensure Golden Gate City public facilities are provided at an acceptable level of service, planned and implemented in concert with the vision of Golden Gate City. Policy 2.3.1 Due to the continued use of individual septic systems and private wells within a densely platted urban area, Collier County Public Utilities will expand sewer and water service in accordance with the Implementation Report attached as Appendix A to Resolution No. 2017-222. Expansion plans shall consider the renewal areas of Golden Gate Parkway and the area surrounding the Activity Center a priority for expansion and shall coordinate its projects with scheduled road and/or stormwater improvements to maximize efficiency and minimize disruption to businesses and residents. Policy 2.3.2 Collier County will support all transportation needs within Golden Gate City with an emphasis on walkability. Walkability will be improved through the implementation of the recommendations of the Metropolitan Planning Organization's Walkability Study. Policy 2.3.3 Redevelopment within the Activity Center shall maintain multiple access points to the surrounding neighborhoods and through the Activity Center while providing safe and direct access to transit stops within or adiacent to the Activity Center. 4 Words underlined are added;words s#iek-thfeegh are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 71 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 839 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 Golden Gate City Sub-Element Policy 2.3.4 Alleys in Golden Gate City may only be vacated if such vacation does not prevent reasonable connection and continuity for future pedestrian, non-motorized and transit trips. Within one year of adoption, Resolution 2013-166 shall be amended to implement this policy. Policy 2.3.5 To ensure a safe and pleasant pedestrian environment, Collier County shall periodically conduct speed studies in Golden Gate City. When appropriate, traffic calming measures and speed limit reductions may be implemented. JREMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK' 5 Words underlined are added;words stuek-tom are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 72 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 840 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 Golden Gate City Sub-Element B. LAND USE DESIGNATION DESCRIPTION SECTION The following section describes the three land use designations shown on the Golden Gate City Future Land Use Map. These designations generally indicate the types of land uses for which zoning may be requested. However, these land use designations do not guarantee that a zoning request will be approved. Requests may be denied by the Board of County Commissioners based on criteria in the Land Development Code or in special studies completed for the County. 1. URBAN DESIGNATION: URBAN MIXED-USE DISTRICT AND URBAN COMMERCIAL DISTRICT Urban Designated Areas on the Future Land Use Map include two general portions of Collier County: areas with the greatest residential densities and areas in close proximity, which have or are projected to receive future urban support facilities and services. It is intended that Urban Designated areas accommodate the majority of population growth and that new intensive land uses be located within them. The boundaries of the Urban Designated areas have been established based on several factors including: patterns of existing development, patterns of approved but unbuilt development, natural resources, water management, and hurricane risk, existing and proposed public facilities, population projections, and land needed to accommodate growth. The Urban Designation will also accommodate future non-residential uses including essential services as defined by the most recently adopted Collier County Land Development Code. Other permitted non-residential land uses may include: a. parks, open space and recreational use; b. water-dependent and water-related uses; c. child care centers; d. community facilities such as neighborhood churches, cemeteries, schools,- and -school facilities- co-located with other public facilities such as parks, libraries, and community centers, where feasible and mutually acceptable, fire and police stations; e. utility and communication facilities. f. support medical facilities such as physician's offices, medical clinics, treatment, research and rehabilitative centers and pharmacies(as long as the dominant use is medical related) may also be permitted provided they are granted concurrent with or located within 1/4 mile of existing or approved hospitals or medical centers which offer primary and urgent care treatment for all types of injuries and traumas, such as, Golden Gate Urgent Care. Stipulations to ensure that the construction of such support medical facilities is concurrent with hospitals or such medical centers shall be determined at the time of zoning approval. Group Housing shall be permitted within the Urban Mixed-Use District and Urban Commercial Districts subject to the definitions and regulations as outlined in the Collier County Land Development Code (Ordinance No. 04-41, as amended) and consistent with locational requirements in Florida Statutes (Chapter 419.001 F.S.). 6 Words underlined are added;words stuelE4hfeugh are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 73 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 841 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 Golden Gate City Sub-Element Group Housing includes the following type facilities: a. Family Care Facility if occupied by not more than six (6) persons shall be permitted in residential areas. b. Group Care Facility, c. Care Units. d. Adult Congregate Living Facilities, and e. Nursing Homes. A. Urban-Mixed Use District This district is intended to accommodate a variety of residential and commercial land uses including single-family, multi-family, duplex, and mixed use (Planned Unit Development). 1. Urban Residential Subdistrict All land within the urban mixed-use designation is zoned and platted. However, any parcel to be rezoned residential is subject to and must be consistent with the Density Rating System. DENSITY RATING SYSTEM: a. BASE DENSITY — Four (4) residential units per gross acre is the eligible density, though not an entitlement. b. DENSITY BONUSES — Density bonuses are discretionary, not entitlements, and are dependent upon meeting the criteria for each bonus provision and compatibility with surrounding properties, as well as the rezone criteria in the Land Development Code. The following densities per gross acre may be added to the base density. In no case shall the maximum permitted density exceed 16 residential dwelling units per gross acre. i. Conversion of Commercial Zoning Bonus 16 dwelling units— If a project includes the conversion of commercial zoning that has been found to be"Consistent By Policy"through the Collier County Zoning Re- evaluation Program (Ordinance No. 90-23), then a bonus of up to 16 dwelling units per acre may be added for every one (1) acre of commercial zoning that is converted to residential zoning. These dwelling units may be distributed over the entire project. ii. Proximity to Activity Center 3 dwelling units -Within 1 mile of Activity Center iii. Affordable Housing Bonus To encourage the provision of affordable housing within certain Districts and Subdistricts in the Urban Designated Area, a maximum of up to 12 residential units per gross acre may be added to the base density if the project meets the requirements of the Affordable Housing Density Bonus Ordinance (Section 2.06.00 of the Land Development Code, Ordinance No. 04-41, as amended) and if the affordable housing units are targeted for families earning no greater than 140% of the median income for Collier County. iv. Residential In-fill If the project is 10 acres or less in size; located within an area with central public water and sewer service; compatible with surrounding land uses; has no common site development plan with adjoining property; no common ownership with any adjacent 7 Words underlined are added;words sttieletlifeugh are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 74 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 842 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 Golden Gate City Sub-Element parcels; and the parcel in question was not created to take advantage of the in-fill residential density. 3 dwelling units v. Roadway Access Density credits based on future roadways will be awarded if the developer commits to construct a portion of the roadway (as determined by the County) or the road is scheduled for completion during the first five years of the Capital Improvement Schedule. Add 1 dwelling unit - if direct access to two or more arterial or collector roads as identified in the Transportation Element. c. There are Density Bands located around Activity Centers. The density band around an Activity Center shall be measured by the radial distance from the center of the intersection around which the Activity Center is situated. If 50% or more of a project is within the density band, the additional density applies to the entire project. Density bands shall not apply within the Estates Designation. 2. High Density Residential Subdistrict: To encourage higher density residential and promote mixed uses in close proximity to Activity Centers, those residential zoned properties permitting up to 12 dwelling units per acre which were located within and consistent with the Activity Center designation at Golden Gate Parkway and Coronado Parkway established by the 1989 Collier County Growth Management Plan and subsequently removed by the creation of a new Activity Center via the adoption of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan are recognized as being consistent with this Master Plan and are outlined on the High Density Residential Subdistrict Map. 3. Downtown Center Commercial Subdistrict: The primary purpose of the Downtown Center Commercial Subdistrict(see Downtown Center Commercial Subdistrict Map) is to encourage redevelopment along Golden Gate Parkway in order to improve the physical appearance of the area and create a vibrant and viable downtown district within Golden Gate City. Emphasis shall be placed on the creation of a pedestrian-oriented boulevard. The provisions of this Subdistrict are intended to ensure harmonious development of commercial and mixed-use buildings at a pedestrian scale that are compatible with residential development within and outside of the Subdistrict. The Subdistrict allows the aggregation of properties in order to promote flexibility in site design. The types of uses permitted within this Subdistrict are low intensity retail, office, personal services, institutional, and residential. Non-residential development is intended to serve the needs of residents within the Subdistrict, surrounding neighborhoods, and passersby. a. All development or redevelopment within the boundaries of the Downtown Center Commercial Subdistrict shall include: i. Provisions for bicycle and pedestrian travel. ii. An emphasis on building aesthetics. ii. Emphasis on the orderly circulation of vehicular, bicycle and pedestrian traffic. iii. Provision for broad sidewalks. iv. Enhanced streetscaping. 8 Words underlined are added;words sttek-tiffeugh are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 75 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 843 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 Golden Gate City Sub-Element v. Project interconnections, where possible and feasible. vi. Quality designs for building facades, including lighting, uniform signage and landscaping. b. Permitted uses within this Subdistrict shall include only the following, except as may be restricted in an implementing zoning overlay district, and except as may be prohibited in Paragraph D, below: i. Those uses permitted by right within the C-1, C-2 and C-3 Zoning Districts, as outlined in the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC); ii. Residential uses permitted by right in the existing residential zoning districts in this Subdistrict; iii. Those permitted uses that may be allowed in an implementing zoning overlay district. c. Conditional uses allowed by this Subdistrict shall include only: i. Those conditional uses allowed within the C-1, C-2 and C-3 Zoning Districts, as outlined in the LDC; ii. Those conditional uses allowed, by the LDC, within existing residential Zoning Districts in this Subdistrict; iii. Those conditional uses that may be allowed in an implementing zoning overlay district; and, d. Prohibited uses in this Subdistrict are as follows: i. Automatic food and drink vending machines located exterior to a building. ii. Any commercial use employing drive-up, drive-in or drive-through delivery of goods or services. iii. Enameling, painting or plating as a primary use. However, these uses are permitted if secondary to an artist's or craft studio. iv. Single-room occupancy hotels, prisons, detention facilities, halfway houses, soup kitchens or homeless shelters. v. Uses as may be prohibited in an implementing zoning overlay district. B. Urban Commercial District 1. Mixed Use Activity Center Subdistrict The Activity Center designated on the Future Land Use Map is intended to accommodate commercial zoning within the Urban Designated Area. Activity Centers are intended to be mixed-use(commercial, residential, institutional)in character. The Activity Center concept is designed to concentrate new and existing commercial zoning in locations where traffic impacts can readily be accommodated, to avoid strip and disorganized patterns of commercial development, and to create focal points within the community. The size and configuration of the Activity Center is outlined on the Urban Mixed-Use Activity Center— Golden Gate Parkway and Coronado Parkway Map. The standard for intensity of commercial uses allowed within each Activity Center is the full array of uses allowed in the C-1 through C-5 Zoning Districts, as identified in the Land Development Code (Ordinance No. 04-41, as amended) excluding the following new commercial uses: Hotels and motels that locate within an Activity Center will be allowed to develop at a density consistent with the Land Development Code. Residential density for residential projects located within the boundaries of the Mixed-Use Activity Center shall be allowed 9 Words underlined are added;words stuelf-through are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 76 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 844 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 Golden Gate City Sub-Element to develop at a density of up to 22 residential units per gross acre. This density may be distributed throughout the project, including any portion located outside of the boundary of the Mixed-Use Activity Center. Certain uses specifically intended to support economic development in Golden Gate City are allowed within the Mixed Use Activity Center. The following uses, as identified with a number from the Standard Industrial Classification Manual are permissible. a. Advanced manufacturing, including automated apparel (2211-2299, and 2311-2399), light assembly (3679) and 3D printing (3571, 3629); b. Call centers (7338); c. Software development and programming (7371); d. Internet technologies and electronic commerce (7374); e. Data and information processing (7374)t f. Professional services that are export based such as laboratory research or testing activities (8734); g. Other uses as may be determined by the Board of County Commissioners consistent with the intent of supporting economic development in Golden Gate City. 2. Golden Gate Urban Commercial In-fill Subdistrict This Subdistrict is located at the southwest quadrant of C.R. 951 and Golden Gate Parkway. Due to the existing zoning and land use pattern in proximity to the Commercial In-fill Subdistrict (see Golden Gate Urban Commercial Infill Subdistrict and Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict Map) and the need to ensure adequate development standards to buffer adjacent land uses, commercial uses shall be permitted under the following criteria: a. Commercial uses shall be limited to: i. Low intensity commercial uses that are compatible with both residential and intermediate commercial uses, in order to provide for small scale shopping and personal needs, and ii. Intermediate commercial to provide for a wider variety of goods and services in areas that have a higher degree of automobile traffic. These uses shall be similar to C-1, C-2, or C-3 zoning districts outlined in the Collier County Land Development Code (Ordinance 91-102), adopted October 30, 1991. b. Rezones shall be encouraged in the form of a Planned Unit Development(there shall be no minimum acreage requirement for PUD rezones except for the requirement that all requests for rezoning must be at least forty thousand (40,000) square feet in area unless the proposed rezone is an extension of an existing zoning district consistent with the Golden Gate Area Master Plan); c. Projects within this Subdistrict shall make provisions for shared parking arrangements with adjoining commercial developments when appropriate; d. Driveways and curb cuts for projects within this Subdistrict shall be consolidated with adjoining commercial developments; and e. Access to projects shall not be permitted from Collier Boulevard. 3. Santa Barbara Commercial Subdistrict The boundaries of the Subdistrict are hereby expanded to include the former Commercial Subdistrict and also to extend approximately one (1) block to the east of the former boundary see Santa Barbara Commercial Subdistrict Map). The intent of the Santa Barbara Commercial Subdistrict is to provide Golden Gate City with an area that is primarily commercial,with an allowance for certain conditional uses. The types of uses permitted within 10 Words underlined are added;words stuelf hrough are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 77 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 845 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 Golden Gate City Sub-Element this Subdistrict are low intensity retail, offices, personal services, and institutional uses, such as neighborhood churches and day care centers. Such development is intended to serve the needs of residents within the Subdistrict and surrounding neighborhoods and persons traveling nearby. Commercial and institutional uses permitted within this Subdistrict are those that: a. Generate/attract relatively low traffic volumes; b. Are appropriately landscaped and buffered to protect nearby residential properties; and c. Are architecturally designed to be compatible with nearby residential areas. 4. Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict The primary purpose of the Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict (see Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict Map) is to encourage redevelopment along Collier Boulevard in order to improve the physical appearance of the area. This Subdistrict is intended to allow a mix of uses, including heavy commercial within those areas presently zoned C-5. This Subdistrict includes properties zoned RMF-12, C-4, and C-5. This Subdistrict will allow commercial development on lands presently zoned residential. Buildings shall be limited to three stories, not to exceed 50 feet, inclusive of under building parking. Within one year of the effective date of this Subdistrict, the Land Development Code shall be amended to establish a zoning overlay containing regulations to implement this Subdistrict. a. All development and redevelopment within this Subdistrict shall include: 1. Provisions for bicycle and pedestrian travel. 2. An emphasis on building aesthetics. 3. Emphasis on the orderly circulation of vehicular, bicycle and pedestrian traffic. 4. Provision for adequate ingress and egress,which may include local street vacation or relocation if alternative access is provided. 5. Provision for broad sidewalks or pathways. 6. Enhanced streetscapinq. 7. Shared parking and/or property interconnections, where possible and feasible. 8. Quality designs for building facades, including lighting, uniform signage and landscaping. REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK) 11 Words underlined are added;words stuck rough are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 78 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 846 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 Golden Gate City Sub-Element C. LIST OF MAPS Golden Gate City Future Land Use Map High Density Residential Subdistrict 1989 Boundaries of Activity Centers Downtown Center Commercial Subdistrict Urban Mixed Use Activity Centers Golden Gate Parkway and Coronado Parkway Golden Gate Urban Commercial Infill Subdistrict and Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict Santa Barbara Commercial Subdistrict Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict 12 Words underlined are added;words stuff are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 79 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 847 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) IppPil INTERSTATE 75 111 -0 0 s. ommfaa `Z af'.C DC C DT C DE D *° C13- Z 8 0yacu0acopOa.• d- 0 m 3 Q aom30onrmEa33d3LO5' 3 DZcCD3c (n D g g- - y d a y a o. N Q K ti m a 7)E N MT nQ Ox a c Eti z O y SANTA BARBARA BLVD m v Ci t = 2 11. 30 NS'$ 0 xi m z ii 00 Q v g NVgz v c y m 3 X,. su NO_ WOOO NW 6 l'.:3 O COLLIER BLVD 9.A.3.kPacket Pg. 848Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan-BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 No changes to map. HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL SUBDISTRICT 1989 BOUNDARIES OF ACTIVITY CENTER n IT 1 I P) i I I 1 I Q..\c=la I --, irli ikom 1 E7 ii-_ ,/ T ____,1 1111 T1Jr[ ir Lt 1 _ _., l 1 ACTIVITY CENTER c',11,"ir Mi——— 1—— c c 1 ,,..._, c h. 1 r---1 CI i I L 1 1 II IIII I I I I 0 500FT 1000FT y 1[I I AMENDED—OCTOBER 14,2008 Ord.No.2008-59 PREPARED BY: GRAPHICS AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT SECTION COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION FILE: GGMP-6B-2008-1.DWG DATE: 10/2008 03/08/2019 Page 81 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 849 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) OTG71] I ImrpmIIIIDSelaBab6r: B D 1m Sant Barbara=LVO0m11TFRSwitI'm,y 5kh2plimmiWn8('j 1 X71 nl 11-' 1 t 1-. . 1 }k' _.7 _ O CrcoOmtiF1suM •.. R r0oZDs4lhLxs,hLL. l Tco3pKIRitcoamDiatlbtEBN- i dZiKs4msitsJiswstasrswv'r Y i s rb CT s ' co0 m o N f a 6„, c4 , y4 .. rt at i U1 LIF 1 iterIS]na TEesa_ yyy!<,0 m m +de G Io! y let a r Qo1T ,' 0 1 —1! 1 T I I NJ il3ivifg ' M' rsdedstsviN mbTsei `10 Il T Li a a w 0. CD 1 I .ILA 9T J 7 fDH j 48 hRRR1GIIY a a n r Q1 T Thl 2 Cbz 00 a T y 4c t C I 1 e]}hF SW — ,i y , ., th tF fp gI 9fith3TIw i_ 0 wmzr mn§i 5fe} t 1 7111... ry '.. _ d 0 0 r w o r o. a0 a I lq 9 , Z00 .> 00 00 0 00 o W o D o W b qc m 14 A p m L stb SI 1 i__,I- ill T's,_ ,‘,,.., -,--< @ _ 1 I b I j W g 7 CA III1 ., i, m k to a I ars 11 l y44 TEH 4 ra L/S1N- 1 1 I I h NI acrd sk vJ Ja 11] 0 r , , , _ w , a. ei n TE C 4ana TEes cr r 1 421,d sr-10 D abs kT viv L L T cwlw 0 o to Ali kr4.o °z a+aJ=B a1K 1 sla I, b. _. _Z 41a r 1 sr a}er TJ I n 1ZtZ 1 st FTS W 1Om Fp' l L r g 1 H 7 fCollierBLVD Calker BLVD-I 9.A.3.kPacket Pg. 850Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan–BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 URBAN MIXED USE ACTIVITY CENTER GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY AND CORONADO PARKWAY COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA 7 11Ltbi ._ I I,„ ///‘ e -4:'''';;:-:-:' -' -- ‘---Fr'Y 9thiaLSNL r I i I 1 I._ 9th1}L .- 7 >\`, ,> 211 r ti6Y.F'SW p 7 2.se 1 trPl Sw11„, La DIFSW 1 7 e7 I _ , ° ,W r - SUBJECT I , — 1-- WILIAM rY 7 i -__ 1 r !- i ._. i 7- 3 ' t' ' L—3 L I , i SITE ; 1 1 n . ' - 22nd Sw 3 r f aVI I r—. 1 r----- , 1 17 ' D 11 , 2Ld Pi 4ti 1! 11 1 otioe) 00 z_ PL SW. , 21rtPL _l GS SYj a Coral Palms IN s,Vit 1 lltrFIi _ I w H .25d; w 3N 0.ii I I i yah/ nm aQ SW, [ v a =I:-------::/> 1;\ 3/-:::'-1' .-,--,::1::', A.,, ' -' s ' , sw a 1'-----11' 2PS1 : : 1'')/ iL ': 1--: ',----'-`.-,:\-: hAvtiti„,,,i.,..--., ‘,'`is),:'-'‘.`', '-` 'i\ ''' \ -* I' ,,../, 7''‘.,,e,',( '' :i\'':‘,,,,\:::::'::-,(:::::,,,/'''':<.,<>/.''',':::-: sw 2atn E0 P y1 r 1 f s+ —-c _ v I l_3WhAYESw— IL r I- I- 1 Lsw AMENDED -JANUARY 25, 2005 a sw T r _Ord. No. 2005-3) AMENDED-JANUARY 25, 2007 — I3,oN•w'.'` r 1 ._'iter AV 5. 1 _ —1 Ord. No. 2007-19) r AMENDED -OCTOBER 14, 2008 7 1 sig Ord. No. 2008-59) l Ls*• . —„ 11 C H t-- 1—' ; 1 1 LEGEND ADDITION PREPARED BY:GIS/CAD MAPPING SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT 0 500 1,000 2,000 Feet ACTIVITY CENTER FILE:RLS-18-CMP-01009 ACTIVITY CENTER MAP.mxd MI BOUNDARIESDATE:04/2018 I I I I II 03/08/2019 Page 83 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 851 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) N GOLDEN GATE URBAN COMMERCIAL INFILL SUBDISTRICT ANDGOLDENGATEESTATESCOMMERCIALINFILLSUBDISTRICT oZSZaCOLLIERCOUNTY, FLORIDA oa amiaNmUN1wNwNNNoOaQaaitim csirn 00:,',CO ti•mMESI ct^ W DO NWHTOaaryr0 ¢0 mo QHSNNNNUOUZZ W -,O ¢ 0 0 0 U>Z Z Z,9Z I 0 DO 28 WO Q¢•Tw— D — D'— D I WZ W W U WN co S W 6£ o^M'$ 15 111W MS 143211SU 15 il6f W S6 CVOH.1NIWJ I Nr U O elf II:1 E3ZU 1----1wceo-, li Tw o linill H-HI--H Ti 0 L, Ci 0 E N NTO k,11N DCw 1 r II 0 La cm U r*-- Vzii1„3n oCCSo wi-o 92 F CD uc: _ ___C IP'W,.T51 I _ 1/ 04%, '` ,c J HVpONW a CI 1 U' W Z W4(i? (? - II A ( 4W E W NW N0NVA31101 Ntl00 ( 1N[f0?Ntl 0 1 U mE • l x ZcnaZ CL W ce, 3 vi I H I H ODZ uii W W Z I a II'IdJaaa IR kik imi CO U o 0 Z9.A.3.kPacket Pg. 852Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master flan-DCC Transmittal Draft 20100000261/CPSP-2010-2Nochangestomap. SANTA BARBARA COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA s' J 10 22 22ND AV.S.W. l9 t0y..' a 115 0 : 41 334 ZI a -8 © 3 NC t0 5 ` 94 99 3 2 35 2 20 .1111=N N®®VI© 9 18 2 42 I vi wmemw®<• b 13 18 18 17 m 2 2W UM N J© 22ND PLACE S.W. 95 98 a N- 'g a ®®h©n©® 22ND PLACE 116 f %G/ 17 g Is ,l 1'Inn 3 { o vi 12\, / 23RD AVENUE S.W. ' i O„ rc '"' - 0 ' 111111111111110,111111111111E „ to < Af'/ 3 I{m10I) 117 V/ N u 2s y 1x ©©©®©®0®©1 0'1 9 12 2 23RD PLACE S.W.a to 24TH AVENUE S.W. 0./ 11 24 9 11 t 7 20 v 0 25 7 10 _2 ] { 5 8 ) fl 10 11 12 1J 1{ 19\ 6 21 1•'' 29 28 27 26 25 24 22 21 20 18 18 1)8'19 28 9 30 23 1._,18 8 5 1? 8 n 9 9 23RD COURT S.W. 23 l 28 10 ) 3 24 1 8 s g 29 g ' J a S 8 7 19 9 41 11 12 tJ 14 2 25t827M2524222120118 ) 5 30 12 5 VI b v 16 `1- 26 \96 97 119 w 7 a 3' IS 24TH AVENUE S.W. r 333 3 t tt 12 , 2 JJ 15 2 2 J 21 S e®) 8 9 10 1 t I 23 22 20 19 18 t] IB 15 14 N 8 24 3 8 102 103 NV A CORONADO PARKWAY N. e 9 a ®N 1 l 1023y 0 g g 8l10 1 04 Ill 1 W re riN © 24 2J 22 21 30 19 IB © 18 15 1{ IS 12 aiii p` 25TH AVENUE S.W. It 26TH AVENUE S.W. A U111/1/®1/11® MIMI all I ® f2 15 N i 18 111/§et IllgarP 1111"11 11 85 101 N7,11 I '25TH cT.s.w. f Ay imei 0 ••• iia' lit" i 106 4 0 ©® e D7 N'A eee : so©osP 0 loto Ille# eV 89 1E0 41 Ni ®iik-0 p 1.416 40Vy v ©4- , SCHURCH&sc 0,o LOT 1 Tr 2 \/ 2 ] P m LOT 2 TR 108 \ N „,a a© s neo . REPEAT N P e® ®itir+sk' J' Sa 9,5 z6 e P28THAVENUES.W. r a 17 F a©w e a Attu ® o ,y4, 09 i©111®©If0 P' N s_4 44 ®® to RS 2 90 99 1;. a z eeee$er©© _®O ® SPLAZ C,E P P{ 11 O 3 22 mmoma© 01410$44©© LA EAS cisc e 14 p 223 l O 3a Q. P 4. 1U5 AZARS11127THCT.S.W. aeee1'lko._' ®i* 22 91 9 8 c!,:, ir co H SANTASQUARE ARA® 11 ---em 1011,...-112 o31JACARANDACENTER GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY C 11e©SP 18 IIIS P 09P7I113PARKWAYCENTE.eII23 • 5 ' J 12 N£ 5e 24 17 l 18 AMENDED - OCTOBER 25, 2004 SAMA BARBARA COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT Ord. No. 2004-71)LEGEND SCALE AMENDED - JUNE 7, 2005 Ord. No. 2005-25 L ORIGINALj SUBDISTR/CT 11111 o zooPT NICA SUBDISTRICTj/PREPARED BY: GRAPHICS AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT SECTION AMENDED - OCTOBER 14, 2008 EXPANSION COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION Ord. No. 2008-59) FILE: CPSP-2004-7G-2008-1.DWG DATE: 10/2008 03/08/2019 Page 85 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 853 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff PIUI.IUJCd Draft Amendments Gulden Gate Area Master Platt—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000201/CP3f-2018-2Nochangestomap. COLLIER BOULEVARD COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA GREEN BOULEVARD C0EMIRE ARMS 1,10,:12,,,..TTTTTTNNNNNN(((([NNN1N!NN3 ORT:. 1 GPEEN 15) H TIE OAKS APARTMENTS `\ m NORNGATE CLUB APER EN15) w Q+ + + `' „ 7 181H PLACE S.W. TRACT B g ITN AVENUE S.W. u w. :\ \,\ mow f IN INl\j\El\I\\ W B:- -'1\\I`\\ \I\\\ ilia 1 FTANE 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 854 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN 8 9 URBAN GOLDEN GATE ESTATES SUB-ELEMENT 10 11 12 Prepared by 13 Collier County Zoning Division 14 15 Prepared for 16 COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 17 Adopted (date) 18 19 Words underlined are added;words stuck thfeugh are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 87 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 855 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element 1 2 AMENDMENTS TO COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN3GOLDENGATEAREAMASTERPLAN: URBAN GOLDEN GATE ESTATES SUB-ELEMENT4 5 DATE AMENDED ORDINANCE NO.6 I date), 2019 7 l 2019-(#) 8 I I 9 ii Words underlined are added;words stuelchxeugh are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 88 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 856 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element 1 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 3 Page 4 5 A. Goals, Objectives and Policies 1 6 7 B. Land Use Designation Description Section 9 8 1. ESTATES DESIGNATION 9 9 A. Estates—Mixed Use District 9 10 1. Residential Estates Subdistrict 11 2. Neighborhood Center Subdistrict 12 3. Conditional Uses Subdistrict 13 4. Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict 14 B. Estates—Commercial District 15 15 1. Interchange Activity Center Subdistrict 16 2. Pine Ridge Road Mixed Use Subdistrict 17 3. Commercial Western Estates Infill Subdistrict 18 4. Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict 19 5. Southbrooke Office Subdistrict 20 21 C. List of Maps 20 22 Golden Gate Area Future Land Use Map 23 Golden Gate Urban Commercial Infill Subdistrict and Golden Gate Estates 24 Commercial Infill Subdistrict 25 Pine Ridge Road (CR 896)— Interchange Activity Center and Pine Ridge Road Mixed 26 Use Subdistrict 27 Golden Gate Estates Neighborhood Centers 28 Collier Boulevard/Pine Ridge Road Center 29 Commercial Western Estates Infill Subdistrict 30 Golden Gate Parkway Interchange Conditional Uses Area 31 Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict 32 Southbrooke Office Subdistrict 33 Conditional Uses Subdistrict: Golden Gate Parkway Special Provisions 34 Special Exceptions to Conditional Use in Golden Gate Estates Words underlined are added;words Stu ough are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 89 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 857 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element A. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES GOAL 1: TO GUIDE LAND USE AND PUBLIC FACILITY DECISION MAKING AND TO BALANCE THE NEED TO PROVIDE BASIC SERVICES WITH NATURAL RESOURCE CONCERNS THROUGH A WELL PLANNED MIX OF COMPATIBLE LAND USES WHICH ENSURE THE HEALTH, SAFETY, WELFARE,AND QUALITY OF LIFE OF THE LOCAL RESIDENTS. OBJECTIVE 1.1: Develop new or revised uses of land consistent with designations outlined on the Golden Gate Estates Future Land Use Map and provisions found in the Land Use Designation Description Section of this Sub Element. Policy 1.1.1: The Policies under the above Objective shall identify the Future Land Use Designations, Districts, and Subdistricts for the Urban Golden Gate Estates. Policy 1.1.2: The Land Use Designation Description Section of this Element shall provide the standards and permitted uses for Urban Golden Gate Estates Future Land Use Districts and Subdistricts. Policy 1.1.3: The Urban Golden Gate Estates Arco Future Land Use Map and companion Future Land Use Designations, Districts, and Subdistricts shall be binding on all development orders unless otherwise permitted in this Master Plan effective with the adoption of this Master Plan. Policy 1.1.4: The ESTATES Future Land Use Designation shall include Future Land Use Districts and Subdistricts for: A. ESTATES—MIXED USE DISTRICT 1. Residential Estates Subdistrict 2. Neighborhood Center Subdistrict 3. Conditional Uses Subdistrict 4. Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict B. ESTATES—COMMERCIAL DISTRICT 1. Interchange Activity Center Subdistrict 2. Pine Ridge Road Mixed Use Subdistrict 3. Commercial Western Estates Infill Subdistrict 4. Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict 5. Southbrooke Office Subdistrict Policy 1.1.5: Conditional Use requests within Urban Golden Gate Estates shall adhere to the guidelines outlined in the Conditional Uses Subdistrict. Policy 1.1.6: No development orders shall be issued inconsistent with the Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub- Element with the exception of those unimproved properties granted a positive determination through the Zoning Re-evaluation Program and identified on the Future Land Use Map Series as 1 Words underlined are added;words stitelethreugh are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 90 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 858 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element properties consistent by Policy and those development orders issued pursuant to conditional uses and rezones approved based on the County-Wide Future Land Use Element (adopted January 10, 1989, Ordinance 89-05) which was in effect at the time of approval. Any subsequent development orders shall also be reviewed for consistency with the Growth Management Plan based on the County-Wide Future Land Use Element. Policy 1.1.7: The sites containing existing public educational plants and ancillary plants, and the undeveloped sites owned by the Collier County School Board for future public educational plants and ancillary plants, within the Urban Golden Gate Estates area, are depicted on the Future Land Use Map Series in the countywide FLUE and on the Public School Facilities Element Map Series, and referenced in FLUE Policy 5.14 and Intergovernmental Coordination Element Policy 1.2.6. All of these sites are subject to the general Interlocal Agreement, adopted on May 15, 2003 by the Collier County School Board and on May 27, 2003 by the Board of County Commissioners, and as subsequently amended and restated, with an effective date of December 2008, and subject to the implementing land development regulations to be adopted. OBJECTIVE 1.2: Ensure public facilities are provided at an acceptable level of service. Policy 1.2.1: Requests for new uses of land shall be subject to level of service standards and concurrency requirements for public facilities as outlined in the Capital Improvement Element of the Growth Management Plan. OBJECTIVE 1.3: Protect and preserve the valuable natural resources within the Urban Golden Gate Estates. Policy 1.3.1: The County shall protect and preserve natural resources within the Urban Golden Gate Estates in accordance with the Objectives and Policies contained within Goals 6 and 7 of the Collier County Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME). Policy 1.3.2: As provided for in CCME Policy 6.1.1, the subdivision of tracts up to 13 acres in size and designated Residential Estates Subdistrict shall not trigger preserve requirements. Policy 1.3.3: Collier County shall coordinate its planning and permitting activities within the Urban Golden Gate Estates with all other applicable environmental planning, permitting and regulatory agencies to ensure that all Federal, State and local natural resource protection regulations are being enforced. OBJECTIVE 1.4: Provide a living environment within the Urban Golden Gate Estates, which is aesthetically acceptable and protects the quality of life. Policy 1.4.1: Collier County shall provide a living environment that is aesthetically acceptable and protects the quality of life through the enforcement of applicable codes and laws. 2 Words underlined are added;words stuek-thfeugk are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 91 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 859 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element Policy 1.4.2: The County's Code Enforcement Board shall strictly enforce the Land Development Code and other applicable codes and laws to control the illegal storage of machinery,vehicles and junk, and the illegal operation of commercial activities within the Urban Golden Gate Estates. GOAL 2: TO PROVIDE FOR LIMITED COMMERCIAL SERVICES AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR PURPOSES OF SERVING THE RURAL NEEDS OF GOLDEN GATE ESTATES RESIDENTS, SHORTENING VEHICULAR TRIPS,AND PRESERVING RURAL CHARACTER. OBJECTIVE 2.1: Meet the locational and rural design criteria contained within the Estates Designation, Estates- Mixed Use District, Neighborhood Center Subdistrict and Conditional Use Subdistrict of this Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element, of the Collier County Growth Management Plan when considering the placement and designation of Neighborhood Centers and Conditional Uses within Urban Golden Gate Estates. Policy 2.1.1: Neighborhood Centers within Urban Golden Gate Estates shall be subject to the locational and rural design criteria established within the Estates Designation, Estates — Mixed Use District, Neighborhood Center Subdistrict of this Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element, of the Collier County Growth Management Plan. Policy 2.1.2: Conditional Uses within Urban Golden Gate Estates shall be subject to locational and dimensional criteria established within the Conditional Use Subdistrict in the Land Use Designation Description section of this Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element. GOAL 3: TO PRESERVE THE AREA'S RURAL CHARACTER, AS DEFINED BY LARGE WOODED LOTS, THE KEEPING OF LIVESTOCK, THE ABILITY TO GROW CROPS, WILDLIFE ACTIVITY, ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP, LOW-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, AND LIMITATIONS ON COMMERCIAL AND CONDITIONAL USES. OBJECTIVE 3.1: Balance the provision of public infrastructure with the need to preserve the rural character of Urban Golden Gate Estates. Policy 3.1.1: Future road and bridge improvements in the Urban Golden Gate Estates shall not only provide for safety and reasonable mobility, but shall also contribute to the rural character of the area. Transportation improvements shall be designed in context with their setting. Policy 3.1.2 The County shall initiate architectural standard requirements in the Land Development Code within two years of adoption that apply to commercial, conditional use and essential services facilities, reflecting the rural character of the Estates area and providing coherence and area identity. 3 Words underlined are added;words stuelt4hfeugh are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 92 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 860 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element Policy 3.1.3: The County Manager or designee shall create a public network of greenway corridors within Urban Golden Gate Estates that interconnects public lands and permanently protected green space. The greenway network shall consist of interconnected trails and paths that allow people to move about the Estates area by means other than motorized vehicles. All greenways shall be constructed within existing or future public easements or rights-of-way. In creating the greenway network, the County shall not employ eminent domain proceedings. Policy 3.1.4: Recognizing the residential nature of the land uses surrounding the 1-75 interchange at Golden Gate Parkway, as well as the restrictions on conditional uses of the Conditional Uses Subdistrict of the Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element, there shall be no further commercial zoning for properties abutting Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. No new commercial uses shall be permitted on properties abutting streets accessing Golden Gate Parkway within the above-defined segment. This policy shall not apply to that existing portion of the Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict, which is located at the northwest corner of the intersection of Golden Gate Parkway and Santa Barbara Boulevard. OBJECTIVE 3.2: Provide for the protection of the rural character of Urban Golden Gate Estates. Policy 3.2.1: Rural character protection provisions shall provide for the preservation of such rural amenities as, but not limited to, wooded lots, the keeping of livestock, the ability to grow crops, wildlife activity, and low-density residential development. Policy 3.2.2: The growing of food crops and/or the keeping of livestock on properties within Urban Golden Gate Estates shall be permitted, provided that such activities are conducted according to the Land Development Code. Policy 3.2.3: Rural character shall be further protected by resisting site-specific Master Plan changes that are out of scale or character with the rural quality of Urban Golden Gate Estates. Policy 3.2.4: Recognizing the low density in Urban Golden Gate Estates, the County will initiate a review of written notification requirements in the Land Development Code and the Administrative Code related to land use petitions in Golden Gate Estates, within 1 year of adoption, and consider increasing the specified distance, with particular attention to properties located on dead-end streets. Policy 3.2.5: Consistent with public safety requirements and best practices for rural areas, outdoor lighting within Urban Golden Gate Estates shall be placed, constructed and maintained in such manner as to prevent or reduce light pollution. In implementing this Policy, the County shall: a. Adhere to the"Collier County Lighting Standards"(County Manager's Office Standards dated January 6, 2017)as amended,with respect to new and existing County owned or maintained sites and structures. b. Continue to coordinate with FPL and FDOT to improve roadway and security lighting consistent with International Dark Skies Association best practices. 4 Words underlined are added;words stuek-throttgh are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 93 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 861 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element c. Consider changes to the Land Development Code and other applicable ordinances to create voluntary or mandatory outdoor lighting standards for commercial, residential or other uses consistent with International Dark Skies Association best practices, and determine the extent such standards apply to new or existing development. OBJECTIVE 3.3: Encourage the preservation of natural resources in Urban Golden Gate Estates, including protection and enhancement of its watershed. Policy 3.3.1: The Land Development Code shall continue to allow and further encourage the preservation of native vegetation and wildlife indigenous to the Urban Golden Gate Estates. Policy 3.3.2: The County shall continue to pursue the Watershed Management Plan initiatives in Urban Golden Gate Estates as financial and staff resources become available. Policy 3.3.3: The County shall encourage the combination of parcels smaller than 2.25 acres with other parcels in order to preserve and enhance low-density environmental advantages. Within two years of adoption of this policy, County staff will present recommendations for property owner incentives to the Board of County Commissioners. Policy 3.3.4: The County will evaluate the use of transferable development rights for the purpose of securing the preservation of wetland or other environmentally significant land within Urban Golden Gate Estates, in a timeframe directed by the Board. Policy 3.3.5: Within two years of adoption, the County, in coordination with the Floodplain Management Committee,will initiate a study on the feasibility of dispersed water management(DWM)for single family Estates lots, and determine the extent to which it will rely on voluntary, incentive or mandatory provisions and whether provisions will apply to developed and undeveloped Estates parcels. Policy 3.3.6: The County will continue to identify and implement educational opportunities related to water resources for parcel owners, homeowners, builders, real estate professionals and the public to aid in understanding and addressing site-specific financial and environmental impacts as well as area-wide impacts to water resources. Policy 3.3.7: The County will periodically coordinate with the South Florida Water Management District to review the Level of Service Standards for primary water management canals within the County and their effect on Urban Golden Gate Estates. Policy 3.3.8: The County shall continue to pursue a best management practices approach to making septage treatment available to residents and businesses within Urban Golden Gate Estates, as a component of bio-solid processing, either directly, through a private entity, or through a public- private partnership. 5 Words underlined are added;words stuek-thfsugh are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 94 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 862 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element GOAL 4: TO PROVIDE FOR A SAFE AND EFFICIENT COUNTY AND LOCAL ROADWAY NETWORK, WHILE AT THE SAME TIME SEEKING TO PRESERVE THE RURAL CHARACTER OF URBAN GOLDEN GATE ESTATES IN FUTURE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE GOLDEN GATE AREA. OBJECTIVE 4.1: Increase linkages within the local road system for the purposes of limiting traffic on arterials and major collectors within Urban Golden Gate Estates, shortening vehicular trips, and increasing overall road system capacity. Policy 4.2.1: The County shall continue to explore alternative financing methods to facilitate both east- west and north-south bridging of canals within Urban Golden Gate Estates. Policy 4.2.2: The County shall update the 2008 Bridge Study to prioritize bridge construction based on emergency response times, evacuation times, cost components, anticipated development patterns and other considerations and shall report its recommendations to the Board of County Commissioners within two years of adoption of this policy. Policy 4.2.3: Planning and right-of-way acquisition for bridges within the Urban Golden Gate Estates local road system shall include consideration of the costs and benefits of including sidewalks and bike lanes. Policy 4.2.4: Sidewalks and bike lanes shall provide access to government facilities, schools, commercial areas and the planned Metropolitan Planning Organization greenway network. Policy 4.2.5: Planning, funding and implementation of potential greenway trails shall be coordinated between the County and the Metropolitan Planning Organization. GOAL 5: TO PROTECT THE LIVES AND PROPERTY OF THE RESIDENTS OF THE URBAN GOLDEN GATE ESTATES,AS WELL AS THE HEALTH OF THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT, THROUGH THE PROVISION OF EMERGENCY SERVICES THAT PREPARE FOR, MITIGATE, AND RESPOND TO, NATURAL AND MANMADE DISASTERS. OBJECTIVE 5.1: Coordinate with local emergency services officials in engineering and constructing road improvements within Urban Golden Gate Estates to ensure that the access needs of fire department, police and emergency management personnel and vehicles are met. Policy 5.1.1: Collier County shall hold at least one annual public meeting with Urban Golden Gate Estates emergency services providers and the local civic association in order to ensure that emergency needs are addressed during the acquisition of right-of-way for design and construction of road improvements. 6 Words underlined are added;words stxek ough are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 95 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 863 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element Policy 5.1.2: Collier County shall continue to coordinate with Golden Gate Area emergency services providers to prioritize necessary road improvements related to emergency evacuation needs. OBJECTIVE 5.2: Ensure that the needs of all applicable emergency services providers are included and coordinated in the overall public project design for capital improvement projects within the Urban Golden Gate Estates. Policy 5.2.1: Preparation of Collier County's annual Schedule of Capital Improvements for projects within the Urban Golden Gate Estates shall be coordinated with the independent Fire Districts that serve Golden Gate Estates (Fire Districts), public and private utilities, Emergency Medical Services Department and the Collier County Sheriff's Department to ensure that public project designs are consistent with the needs of these agencies. Policy 5.2.2: Fire Districts, Collier County Emergency Medical Services Department and the Collier County Sheriff's Department will receive copies of pre-construction plans for capital improvement projects in the Urban Golden Gate Estates and will be invited to review and comment on plans for the public projects. OBJECTIVE 5.3: Maintain and implement public information programs through the Collier County Bureau of Emergency Services, Collier County Sheriff's Department, Fire Districts, and other appropriate agencies, to inform residents and visitors of the Urban Golden Gate Estates regarding the means to prevent, prepare for, and cope with, man-made and natural disasters. Policy 5.3.1: The Fire Districts that serve the Golden Gate area, and other appropriate agencies, shall embark on an education program to assist residents in knowing and understanding the value and need for prescribed burning on public lands in high risk fire areas. Policy 5.3.2: The Fire Districts and Collier County Bureau of Emergency Services shall actively promote the Firewise Communities Program through public education in Urban Golden Gate Estates. Policy 5.3.3 Fire Districts and the Collier County Bureau of Emergency Services shall hold one or more annual open house" presentations in the Golden Gate area emphasizing issues related to wildfires, flooding, emergency access and general emergency management. OBJECTIVE 5.4: Pursue appropriate planning and mitigation measures to address the threat of wildfires in Urban Golden Gate Estates. Policy 5.4.1: Collier County shall evaluate the Land Development Code for Urban Golden Gate Estates requirements that are found to be inconsistent with acceptable fire prevention standards. This evaluation process shall be coordinated with the Fire Districts and the Collier County Bureau of Emergency Services. 7 Words underlined are added;words stuck threugh are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 96 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 864 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element Policy 5.4.2: The County shall explore annually, options for funding wildfire prevention measures undertaken by the County, Florida Forest Service and/or Fire Districts, including but not limited to Urban Golden Gate Estates Municipal Services Taxing Units(MSTU)revenue, grant funding and general fund revenue. Policy 5.4.3: The County shall review annually and update as necessary, all interlocal agreements and mutual aid agreements to assure coordination of legal, procedural and educational components of wildfire prevention. Policy 5.4.4: County-owned property within Urban Golden Gate Estates shall be subiect to an active, on-going management plan to reduce the damage caused by wildfires originating from County-owned properties. REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANKT 8 Words underlined are added;words stuek rough are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 97 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 865 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element B. LAND USE DESIGNATION DESCRIPTION SECTION The following section describes the three land use designations shown on the Urban Golden Gate Estates Future Land Use Map. These designations generally indicate the types of land uses for which zoning may be requested. However, these land use designations do not guarantee that a zoning request will be approved. Requests may be denied by the Board of County Commissioners based on criteria in the Land Development Code or in special studies completed for the County. 1. ESTATES DESIGNATION This designation is characterized by low density semi-rural residential lots with limited opportunities for other land uses. Typical lots are 2.25 acres in size. However,there are some legal non-conforming lots as small as 1.14 acres. Residential density is limited to a maximum of one unit per 2.25 gross acres, or one unit per legal non-conforming lot of record, exclusive of guesthouses. Multiple family dwelling units, duplexes, and other structures containing two or more principal dwellings, are prohibited in all Districts and Subdistricts in this Designation. Generally,the Estates Designation also accommodates future non-residential uses, including: a. Conditional uses and essential services as defined in the Land Development Code, except as prohibited in the Neighborhood Center Subdistrict. Also, refer to the Conditional Uses Subdistrict. b. Parks, open space and recreational uses. c. Group Housing shall be permitted subiect to the definitions and regulations as outlined in the Collier County Land Development Code (Ordinance No. 04-41, as amended)and consistent with locational requirements in Florida Statutes (Chapter 419.001 F.S.). d. Schools and school facilities in the Estates Designation north of 1-75, and where feasible and mutually acceptable, co-locate schools with other public facilities, such as parks, libraries and community centers to the extent possible. Group Housing includes the following type facilities: aa. Family Care Facility if occupied by not more than six (6) persons shall be permitted in residential areas. bb. Group Care Facility, cc. Care Units, dd.Adult Congregate Living Facilities, and ee. Nursing Homes. All of the above uses shall be consistent with all of the Goals, Obiectives and Policies of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan. A. Estates—Mixed-Use District 1. Residential Estates Subdistrict Single-family residential development is allowed within this Subdistrict at a maximum density of one unit per 2.25 gross acres, or one unit per legal non-conforming lot of record, exclusive of guesthouses. 2. Neighborhood Center Subdistrict Recognizing the need to provide basic goods, services and amenities to Estates residents, one Neighborhood Center has been designated on the Urban Golden Gate 9 Words underlined are added;words stuff are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 98 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 866 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element Estates Future Land Use Map. The Neighborhood Center designation does not guarantee that commercial zoning will be granted. The designation only provides the opportunity to request commercial zoning. a. The Collier County Land Development Code shall be amended to provide rural design criteria to regulate all new commercial development within Neighborhood Centers. b. Locations Neighborhood Centers are located along major roadways and are distributed within Golden Gate Estates according to commercial demand estimates. (See Golden Gate Estates Neighborhood Centers Map). The centers are designed to concentrate all new commercial zoning, and conditional uses, as allowed in the Estates Zoning District, in locations where traffic impacts can be readily accommodated and to avoid strip and disorganized patterns of commercial and conditional use development. One Neighborhood Center is established as follows: i. Collier Boulevard and Pine Ridge Road Center. The center at Collier Boulevard and Pine Ridge Road is located on both sides sf the intersection. Tracts 109-114, Unit 26, Golden Gate Estates are included in this center as eligible for commercial development. (See Collier Boulevard/Pine Ridge Road Center Map). The E1/2 of Tract 107, Unit 26 is also included within this center but is only to be used for buffer, water management and open space. c. Criteria for land uses at the center is as follows: Commercial uses shall be limited to intermediate commercial so as to provide for a wider variety of goods and services in areas that have a higher degree of automobile traffic. These uses shall be similar to C-1, C-2, or C- 3 zoning districts outlined in the Collier County Land Development Code Ordinance No. 04-41, as amended), except as prohibited below. ii. The Neighborhood Center located at the intersection of Pine Ridge Road and Collier Boulevard may be developed at 100% commercial and must provide internal circulation. Any rezoning is encouraged to be in the form of a PUD. This Neighborhood Center may also be utilized for single-family residential or conditional uses allowed in the Estates zoning district such as neighborhood churches, social or fraternal organizations, childcare centers, schools, and group care facilities. iv. A single project shall utilize no more than 50% of the total allowed commercial acreage. This percentage may be increased at the discretion of the Board of County Commissioners. v. The project shall make provisions for shared parking arrangements with adioininq developments. vi. Access points shall be limited to one per 180 feet commencing from the right-of-way of the major intersecting streets of the Neighborhood Center. A maximum of three curb cuts per quadrant shall be allowed. vii. Driveways and curb cuts shall be consolidated with adjoining developments, whenever possible. viii. Driveways accessing parcels on opposite sides of the roadway shall be in direct alignment,except when the roadway median between the two parcels has no opening. 10 Words underlined are added;words staek-threttgh are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 99 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 867 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element ix. Projects shall provide a 25-foot wide landscape buffer abutting the external right-of-way. This buffer shall contain two staggered rows of trees that shall be spaced no more than 30 feet on center, and a double row hedge at least 24 inches in height at time of planting and attaining a minimum of three feet height within one year. A minimum of 50% of the 25-foot wide buffer area shall be comprised of a meandering bed of shrubs and ground covers other than grass. Existing native trees must be retained within this 25-foot wide buffer area to aid in achieving this buffer requirement; other existing native vegetation shall be retained, where possible, to aid in achieving this buffer requirement. Water retention/detention areas shall be allowed in this buffer area if left in natural state, and drainage conveyance through the buffer area shall be allowed if necessary to reach an external outfall. a. For Tract 114, Golden Gate Estates, Unit 26, access shall be restricted to 11th Avenue S.W. Also, vehicular interconnection shall be provided to the adjacent property(s) in the Pine Ridge Road/Collier Boulevard Neighborhood Center. b. All buildings shall have tile roofs, 'Old Style Florida' metal roofs, or decorative parapet walls above the roofline. The buildings shall be finished in light, subdued colors, except for decorative trim. x. All lighting facilities shall be architecturally—designed, and shall be limited to a height of twenty-five (25)feet. Such lighting facilities shall be shielded from neighboring residential land uses and consistent with Policy 5.2.4. xi. Commercial uses shall encourage pedestrian traffic through placement of sidewalks, pedestrian walkways, and marked crosswalks within parking areas. Adjacent projects shall coordinate placement of sidewalks so that a continuous pathway through the Neighborhood Center is created. xii. All buildings and projects within any single specific quadrant of the Subdistrict shall utilize a common architectural theme. This theme shall be applicable to both building design and signage. xiii. Fences or walls may be constructed on the commercial side of the required landscape buffer between adjacent commercial and residential uses. If constructed, such fences or walls shall not exceed five (5) feet in height. Walls shall be constructed of brick or stone. Fences shall be of wood or concrete post or rail types, and shall be of open design (not covered by slats, boards or wire). xiv. Projects directly abutting residential property (property zoned E-Estates and without an approved conditional use) shall provide, at a minimum, a seventy-five (75) feet wide buffer in which no parking uses are permitted. Twenty-five (25) feet of the width of the buffer along the developed area shall be a landscape buffer. A minimum of fifty (50)feet of the buffer width shall consist of retained native vegetation and must be consistent with subsection 3.05.07H. of the Collier County Land Development Code(LDC). The native vegetation retention area may consist of a perimeter berm and be used for water management detention. Any newly constructed berm shall be revegetated to meet subsection 3.05.07H. of the LDC (native vegetation replanting requirements). Additionally, in order to be considered for approval, use of the native vegetation retention area for water management purposes shall meet the following criteria: 11 Words underlined are added;words stuelchrough are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 100 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 868 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element a. There shall be no adverse impacts to the native vegetation being retained. The additional water directed to this area shall not increase the annual hydro-period unless it is proven that such would have no adverse impact to the existing vegetation. b. If the project requires permitting by the South Florida Water Management District, the project shall provide a letter or official document from the District indicating that the native vegetation within the retention area will not have to be removed to comply with water management requirements. If the District cannot or will not supply such a letter, then the native vegetation retention area shall not be used for water management. c. If the project is reviewed by Collier County, the County engineer shall provide evidence that no removal of native vegetation is necessary to facilitate the necessary storage of water in the water management area. xix. Projects within the Neighborhood Center Subdistrict that are submitted as PUDs shall provide a functional public open-space component. Such public open-space shall be developed as green space within a pedestrian-accessible courtyard, as per Section 4.06.03B. of the Collier County Land Development Code, as in effect at the time of P.U.D. approval. xx. The following principal permitted uses are prohibited within Neighborhood Centers: a. Drinking Places (5813) and Liquor Stores (5921) b. Mail Order Houses (5961) c. Merchandizinq Machine Operators (5962) d. Power Laundries (7211) e. Crematories (7261) (Does not include non-crematory Funeral Parlors) f. Radio, TV Representatives (7313) and Direct Mail Advertising Services (7331) g. NEC Recreational Shooting Ranges, Waterslides, etc. (7999) h. General Hospitals(8062), Psychiatric Hospitals(8063), and Specialty Hospitals (8069) i. Elementary and Secondary Schools (8211), Colleges (8221), Junior Colleges (8222) j. Libraries (8231) k. Correctional Institutions (9223) I. Waste Management(9511) m. Homeless Shelters and Soup Kitchens. 3. Conditional Uses Subdistrict Various types of conditional uses are permitted in the Estates zoning district within the Urban Golden Gate Estates area. In order to control the location and spacing of new conditional uses, one of the following four sets of criteria shall be met: a. Essential Services Conditional Use Provisions: Those Essential Services Conditional Uses, as identified within Section 2.01.03 G. of the Collier County Land Development Code, may be allowed anywhere within the Estates Zoning District, except as prohibited in certain Neighborhood Centers, and are described as: 12 Words underlined are added;words stuelc eugh are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 101 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 869 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element 1. electric or gas generating plants, 2. effluent tanks, 3. major re-pump stations, 4. sewage treatment plants, including percolation ponds, 5. hospitals and hospices, 6. water aeration or treatment plants, 7. governmental facilities (except for those Permitted Uses identified in Section 2.01.03 of the Land Development Code), 8. public water supply acquisition, withdrawal, or extraction facilities, and 9. public safety service facilities, and other similar facilities. b. Golden Gate Parkway and Collier Boulevard Special Provisions: 1. Recognizing the existing residential nature of the land uses surrounding the 1-75 interchange at Golden Gate Parkway, there shall be no further conditional uses for properties abutting Golden Gate Parkway, between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard, except: as permitted within the Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict and the Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict; as provided in subparagraphs 3. and 5. below; for the properties identified as Unit 30 Tracts 113-115 and the N 150'of tract 116 that have existing Conditional Uses; and, for essential services, as described in paragraph a., above. 2. Further, no properties abutting streets accessing Golden Gate Parkway, between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard, shall be approved for conditional uses except: as permitted within the Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict; as provided in subparagraph 3. below; and,for essential services, as described in paragraph a. above. 3. In consideration of the improvements associated with the interchange at Interstate 75 and Golden Gate Parkway, the existing conditional use church and related facilities) located at the southeast corner of Golden Gate Parkway and 66th Street S.W. may be expanded in acreage and intensity along the south side of Golden Gate Parkway to the east of 66th Street S.W., but the total project area shall not exceed approximately 9.22 acres(see Golden Gate Parkway Interchange Conditional Uses Area Map). 4. The parcel located immediately south of the Commercial Western Estates Infill Subdistrict,on the west side of Collier Boulevard, and at the southwest quadrant of the intersection of Vanderbilt Beach Road and Collier Boulevard, shall be eligible for a transitional conditional use designation. 5. Conditional use for expansion of the existing educational and charitable social organization (Naples Bridge Center) is allowed on the east 150 feet of Tract 75 and the west 150 feet of Tract 82, Unit 30, Golden Gate Estates. The maximum building area permitted on the two parcels shall be limited to 15,000 square feet. Use of Tract 82 shall be limited to parking, water management and open space uses. See Conditional Uses Subdistrict Golden Gate Parkway Special Provisions map. 6. The property located on Collier Boulevard identified as Golden Gate Estates Unit 1, north 150 feet of TR 114, less right-of-way, shall be eligible for Conditional Use. c. Neighborhood Center Transitional Conditional Use Provisions: Conditional uses shall be allowed immediately adjacent to designated Neighborhood Centers subject to the following criteria: 13 Words underlined are added;words stuff are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 102 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 870 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element 1. Properties eligible for conditional uses shall abut the arterial or collector road serving the Neighborhood Center, 2. Such uses shall be limited to transitional conditional uses that are compatible with both residential and commercial such as neighborhood churches, social or fraternal organizations, childcare centers, schools, and group care facilities, 3. All conditional uses shall make provisions for shared parking arrangements with adjoining developments whenever possible, 4. Conditional uses abutting Estates zoned property shall provide, at a minimum, a 75-foot buffer of native vegetation in which no parking or water management uses are permitted, 5. Conditional uses adjoining the commercial uses within Neighborhood Centers shall, whenever possible, share parking areas, access and curb cuts with the adjoining commercial use, in order to facilitate traffic movement. d. Transitional Conditional Uses: Conditional uses may be granted in Transitional Areas. A Transitional Area is defined as an area located between existing non-residential and residential areas. The purpose of this provision is to allow conditional uses in areas that are adjacent to existing non-residential uses and are therefore generally not appropriate for residential use. The conditional use will act as a buffer between non-residential and residential areas. The following criteria shall apply for Transitional Conditional Use requests: 1. Site shall be directly adjacent to a non-residential use (zoned or developed); 2. Site shall be 2.25 acres, or more, in size or be at least 150 feet in width and shall not exceed 5 acres; 3. Site abutting Estates zoned property without an approved conditional use shall provide, at a minimum, a 75-foot buffer of native vegetation in which no parking or water management uses are permitted; 4. Site shall not be adjacent to a church, neighborhood church or other place of worship, school, social or fraternal organization, child care center, convalescent home, hospice, rest home, home for the aged, adult foster home, children's home, rehabilitation centers; 5. Site shall not be adjacent to parks or open space and recreational uses; and 6. Site shall not be adjacent to permitted (by right) Essential Service uses, as identified in Section 2.01.03 of the Land Development Code, except may be located adjacent to libraries and museums. e. Special Exceptions to Conditional Use Locational Criteria: 1. Temporary use (TU) permits for model homes, as defined in the Collier County Land Development Code, may be allowed anywhere within the Estates-Mixed Use District. Conditional use permits for the purpose of extending the time period for use of the structure as a model home shall be required, and shall be subject to the provisions of Section 5.04.04B. and C. of the Collier County Land Development Code, Ordinance No.04- 41, as amended. Such conditional uses shall not be subject to the locational criteria of the Conditional Uses Subdistrict, and may be allowed anywhere within the Estates-Mixed Use District. 14 Words underlined are added;words steel eugh are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 103 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 871 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element 2. Conditional Use permits for excavation, as provided for in the Estates zoning district, are not subject to the locational criteria for Conditional Uses and may be allowed anywhere within the Estates-Mixed Use District. 3. Conditional Use for a church or place of worship, as provided for in the Estates zoning district, is allowed on Tract 22, Golden Gate Estates, Unit 97 (See Special Exception to Conditional Use Location Criteria Map). 4. Conditional Use for a church or place of worship as allowed in the Estates Zoning District is allowed on the north 180 feet of Tract 107, Unit 30, Golden Gate Estates. Church-related day care use shall not be allowed. Development shall be limited to a maximum of 12,000 square feet of floor area (See Special Exception to Conditional Use Location Criteria Map). 5. Conditional Use for a cellular tower is be allowed in the Estates Zoning District only on parcels no smaller than 2.25 acres and adjacent to a roadway classified within the Transportation Element as a Collector or Arterial. 4. Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict This Subdistrict is specific to Tracts 43, 50, 59, and 66 of Golden Gate Estates Unit 30, and includes four parcels of land containing approximately 16.3 acres, located on the north side of Golden Gate Parkway, east of 1-75 and west of Santa Barbara Boulevard. The intent of the Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict is to provide for the continued operation of existing uses, and the development and redevelopment of institutional and related uses. The Subdistrict is intended to be compatible with the neighboring residential uses and will utilize well-planned access points to ensure safe and convenient access onto Golden Gate Parkway. The following institutional uses are permitted through the conditional use process within the Subdistrict: a. Neighborhood churches and other places of worship. b. Group care facilities (Categories I and II) c. Nursing homes and assisted living facilities associated with the David Lawrence Center. d. Essential services as set forth in Section 2.01.03 of the Collier County Land Development Code, Ordinance No. 04-41, as amended. e. Private schools associated with the David Lawrence Center or Parkway Community Church of God, for Tracts 43, 50 and 59 only. f. Day care centers associated with the David Lawrence Center or Parkway Community Church of God. g. Medical offices associated with the David Lawrence Center. B. Estates—Commercial District 1. Interchange Activity Center Subdistrict On the fringes of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan boundaries, there are several parcels that are located within the Interchange Activity Center#10 at 1-75 and Pine Ridge Road as detailed in the County-wide Future Land Use Element (FLUE). Parcels within this Activity Center are subject to the County-wide FLUE and not this Master Plan. See Activity Center and Pine Ridge Road Mixed Use Subdistrict Map for a detailed map of this Activity Center. 15 Words underlined are added;words stuck eugh are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 104 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 872 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element 2. Pine Ridge Road Mixed Use Subdistrict This Subdistrict is adjacent to the northwest quadrant of Interchange Activity Center #10, west of the Naples Gateway PUD, and comprises 16.23 acres. It consists of Tracts 1, 12, 13 and 28 of Golden Gate Estates, Unit 35, as recorded in Plat Book 7, Page 85, of the Public Records of Collier County. The intent of the Pine Ridge Road Mixed Use Subdistrict is to allow for a mix of both retail and office uses to provide for shopping and personal services for the surrounding residential areas within a convenient travel distance and to provide commercial services appropriately located along a collector roadway, Livingston Road. Well-planned access points will be used to improve current and future traffic flows in the area. Within this Subdistrict no more than 35,000 square feet of office-related uses on 3.2 acres are permitted within the eastern portion of this property, which includes a portion of Tract 28 and a portion of Tract 13. A maximum of 80,000 square feet of gross leasable retail or office area, as allowed in the Commercial Intermediate District (C-3) of the Collier County Land Development Code in effect as of the effective date of the adoption of this Subdistrict [Ordinance No. 03-01, adopted January 16, 20031, are permitted within the western 10.52 acres of this property. The C-3 uses are not an entitlement. Such uses will be further evaluated at the time of rezoning application to insure appropriateness in relationship to surrounding properties. A rezoning of the western 10.52 acres is encouraged to be in the form of a Planned Unit Development. Regulations for water management, uniform landscaping, signage, screening and buffering will be included in the rezoning ordinance to ensure compatibility with nearby residential areas, and shall be subject to the following additional criteria: a. There shall be no access onto Livingston Woods Lane. b. Shared access shall be encouraged. c. Building heights shall not exceed 35 feet. d. There shall be a minimum setback area of 75 feet along the northern property line. e. Driveway access, parking, and water management facilities may be allowed within the 75-foot setback area along the northern property line, but none of these uses shall be located closer than 30 feet to this line. f. No freestanding automobile parking lots, homeless shelters or soup kitchens shall be permitted. g. Within the eastern portion of Tract 28, 2.2 acres, more or less, shall be preserved as wetlands and no development shall occur within that area. h. Within the western 10.52 acres, a loop road shall be constructed through the property to provide access from Pine Ridge Road to Livingston Road and to reduce traffic at the intersection. See Activity Center and Pine Ridge Road Mixed Use Subdistrict Map for a detailed map of this Subdistrict. 3. Commercial Western Estates Infill Subdistrict The purpose of the Subdistrict is to allow for limited commercial and/or medical office uses, in recognition of the subject property's unsuitability for single-family residential development. Limited commercial and/or medical uses at this location will also assist in reducing the distance and the number of vehicular trips generated within the general area through trip capture. The standards contained in this Subdistrict are designed to 16 Words underlined are added;words stook through are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 105 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 873 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element ensure that uses within the Subdistrict will be compatible with nearby residential development. A loop road shall be required through the property to connect Vanderbilt Beach Road with Collier Boulevard will also serve to lessen vehicular trips through the intersection. a. Size and Location: The Subdistrict includes a 6.23-acre parcel, located at the southwest corner of Vanderbilt Beach Road and Collier Boulevard (see Commercial Western Estates Infill Subdistrict Map). The parcel is identified as Tract 105, Unit 2, Golden Gate Estates. b. Permitted Uses and Development Intensity: Within the subject property, 3.93 acres of office/medical use is permitted with a maximum of forty-one thousand four hundred and ninety (41,490) square feet of gross leaseable area permitted or approximately 6,660 square feet per gross acre. The balance of the area,comprising+2.3 acres, shall remain in open space. Uses allowed within this Subdistrict shall be those office uses, medical uses, and financial institutions permitted whether by right or by conditional use, within the C-1 zoning district, as contained in the Collier County Land Development Code, Ordinance 91-102, as of the effective date of the adoption of this Subdistrict Ordinance No. 03-01, adopted January 16, 20031. c. Development Standards: 1. All permitted uses within this Subdistrict shall be encouraged to be submitted in the form of a Planned Unit Development (P.U.D.) for the subject property with special attention to be provided for shared access, water management, uniform landscaping, signage, screening and buffering to ensure compatibility with nearby residential areas. 2. Building height shall be limited to two stories, with a maximum height of thirty 30)feet, except that portions of the property within one hundred (100)feet of the buffer described in item #3, below, shall be limited to one story with a maximum height of twenty-five (25)feet. 3. There shall be a setback of seventy-five (75) feet in width abutting Estates- zoned property. Where feasible, existing native vegetation shall be retained within this setback area. Water retention/detention areas shall be allowed in this setback area provided that the area is left in a natural state, and drainage conveyance through the setback area shall be allowed, as necessary, in order for stormwater to reach an external outfall. 4. The buffer area along Collier Boulevard/CR-951 and Vanderbilt Beach Road shall be 25 feet in width and shall conform to the vegetative requirements of a Type "B" buffer as provided for in the Collier County Land Development Code, in effect as of the date of adoption of this amendment [Ordinance No. 03-01, adopted January 16, 20031. A loop road shall be constructed, internal to the subject property. This road shall be open to the public, in order to connect Vanderbilt Beach Road and Collier Boulevard, so as to provide an alternative to use of the intersection. 5. The maximum gross leaseable floor area of each individual office/medical/financial building footprint shall be 6,000 square feet. However, buildings may be connected by architectural treatments, and shall be designed to appear similar to residential structures through the treatment of rooflines and other architectural embellishments. 17 Words underlined are added;words stook-through are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 106 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 874 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element 6. No development of property within the Subdistrict shall commence until the abutting segment of Collier Boulevard is four-laned. 4. Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict This Subdistrict consists of two infill areas. The two areas are located at the northwest corner of Collier Boulevard and Green Boulevard and at the northwest corner of Santa Barbara Boulevard and Golden Gate Parkway. Due to the existing zoning and land use pattern in proximity to the Estates Commercial In-fill Subdistrict(see Golden Gate Urban Commercial Infill Subdistrict and Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict Map) and the need to ensure adequate development standards to buffer adjacent land uses, commercial uses shall be permitted under the following criteria: a. Commercial uses shall be limited to: 1. Low intensity commercial uses that are compatible with both residential and intermediate commercial uses, in order to provide for small scale shopping and personal needs, and 2. Intermediate commercial to provide for a wider variety of goods and services in areas that have a higher degree of automobile traffic. These uses shall be similar to C-1, C-2, or C-3 zoning districts outlined in the Collier County Land Development Code (Ordinance 91-102), adopted October 30, 1991. b. Rezones shall be encouraged in the form of a Planned Unit Development (there shall be no minimum acreage requirement for PUD rezones except for the requirement that all requests for rezoning must be at least forty thousand (40,000) square feet in area unless the proposed rezone is an extension of an existing zoning district consistent with the Golden Gate Area Master Plan). c. Projects within this Subdistrict shall make provisions for shared parking arrangements with adjoining commercial developments when appropriate. d. Driveways and curb cuts for proiects within this Subdistrict shall be consolidated with adjoining commercial developments. e. Access to projects shall not be permitted from Collier Boulevard. f. Any project located within this Subdistrict at the northwest corner of Golden Gate Parkway and Santa Barbara Boulevard, less and except an easement for Santa Barbara Boulevard right-of-way, shall be subject to the following additional development restrictions: 1. The site shall be limited to thirty-five thousand (35,000) square feet of building area. 2. Land uses shall be restricted to offices only. 3. All principal structures shall be required to have a minimum setback of one hundred (100)feet from the proiects northern boundary. 4. The northern seventy-five (75)feet of the western sixty(60) percent of the site shall be a green area (open space area). It shall be utilized for only water management facilities, landscape buffers, and similar uses. 5. The western sixty (60) percent of the site shall have an outdoor pedestrian- friendly patio(s), that total at least five hundred (500) square feet in area and incorporate a minimum of: benches or seating areas for at least twelve (12) persons, and vegetative shading, and a waterfall or water feature ofat least one hundred (100) square feet in area, and brick pavers. 6. A twenty-five (25)foot wide landscaped strip shall be provided along the entire frontage of both Golden Gate Parkway and Santa Barbara Boulevard. 7. A minimum buffer of thirty-five (35) feet in width shall be provided along the project's western boundary and along the eastern forty (40) percent of the 18 Words underlined are added;words staelchrettgh are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 107 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 875 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element project's northern boundary. A minimum buffer of fifty (50) feet in width shall be provided along the western sixty (60) percent of the project's northern boundary. Where feasible, existing native vegetation shall be retained within these buffers along the project's western and northern boundaries. These buffers shall be supplemented with Oak or Mahogany trees planted a maximum of twenty (20) feet apart in a staggered manner; and a seven (7) foot wall, fence, or hedge that will, within two (2) years of planting, grow to a minimum height of seven (7)feet and be a minimum of ninety-five (95) percent opaque. 8. All buildings shall have tile or metal roofs, or decorative parapet walls above the roofline, and buildings shall be finished in light subdued colors except for decorative trim. 9. Building heights shall be limited to one (1)-story and a maximum of thirty-five 135)feet. 10.All lighting facilities shall be architecturally designed, and limited to a height of twenty-five (25)feet. Such lighting facilities shall be shielded from neighboring residential land uses. 11.There shall be no ingress or egress on Santa Barbara Boulevard. 5. Southbrooke Office Subdistrict The Southbrooke Office Subdistrict is approximately five (5) acres and is located approximately 1/4 mile east of Oakes Boulevard on the south side of Immokalee Road. he intent of the subdistrict is to permit general office, medical office, and business service uses generally consistent with those uses permissible by right, or as a conditional use in the C-1 Commercial Professional and General Office zoning district. Development within the Subdistrict is encouraged to be rezoned as a PUD in order to provide greater specificity of permitted land uses, development standards and any necessary operational characteristics. A maximum of 40,000 square feet of commercial development shall be permitted. All buildings will be limited to single- story, and shall be constructed in a common architectural theme. A minimum 30 feet in width vegetated buffer shall be provided adjacent to Autumn Oaks Lane,which shall consist of retained native vegetation. Access to the Subdistrict shall only be from Immokalee Road. JREMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK' 19 Words underlined are added;words s ugh are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 108 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 876 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element C. LIST OF MAPS Golden Gate Area Future Land Use Map Golden Gate Urban Commercial Infill Subdistrict and Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict Pine Ridge Road (CR 896)— Interchange Activity Center and Pine Ridge Road Mixed Use Subdistrict Golden Gate Estates Neighborhood Centers Collier Boulevard/Pine Ridge Road Center Commercial Western Estates Infill Subdistrict Golden Gate Parkway Interchange Conditional Uses Area Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict Southbrooke Office Subdistrict Conditional Uses Subdistrict: Golden Gate Parkway Special Provisions Special Exceptions to Conditional Use in Golden Gate Estates 20 Words underlined are added;words stink are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 109 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 877 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) S.P.0.0........1 11........1.01.-50[1r*Pre ILEWDESIGNATION ESTATES DESIGNATION AGRICULTURAL!RURAL DESIGNATION MIXED USE DISTRICT MIXED USE DISTRICT Es flural S.....owtia Urian Res4501 SubOisInct =Fden.E.. SE De.,Res...Su.sOld Cond..Uses Sulxh.c1 OVERLAYS AND SPECIAL FEATURES b__,,',p.m cant.Comma Sulx11.c1 5.:ral E.pbons la COM!LIM 1.0.0.181CI1.11 erm so,..,Cs*Gate Ettates lialunil 101.**5 GOLDEN GATE AREA COMMERCIAL DISTRICT Ell==.., LaGa Ream.P.iction Area 0....y NE r4t.,....p Neighborl.c1 Center Subela.1 0 Roan.Oensity eands 1: FUTURE LAND USE MAP mosion suea.t. UM s.ta Barbara Commerdal.1.1.1cn m Emoacms-ama sueam. N.. IMMOKALEE RD I— S ''' COMMERCIAL DISTRICT I InA5M"A:IC=1:r= CP- Dement m the GmT) P.Ridge 1.....4 l.Su.str. MI R.dell smara con....1 sadst. cornmer.waster,E...111.1304.1 ea Est.6 SM1000^0 C..,..... IN 5000.te Moe Sardielnd ioNa.1,CAN MOT 7 INIERPRETED WIRIOul THE Croa,OBJEC1WES vOtiCESAMO UM,uSE DES...1 DESCFai,1.1 SECT.OF'ME CAM. Z M i T — OIL WELL RD I VI U) 1 co al 7 BEER I—IMMOKALEE RD I . Z IC 11 I d SUBJECT SITE(ADDITIONS) 0 CPSP-2018-2 1 r VANDE RBILT1 I k BEACH RD 1,, Z 4 IQands. 3 RIIMID I 8 I taaDEN GATE BLVD 4 gat GOWEN GATE BLVD 1 A Rai Galan Ora 44•Not PINE R ,' RDA IIr R vo CD Z I ia 9 0, 0 g u.. t.... J GURU RADIO RDINTERSTATE 75 INTERSTATE 75 C- DAVIS BLVD 0 A S.R.84 cr2 8 Icn 0 II 0 RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK RD d r cz,Lo e9,_ 5 GOLDEN GATE FUTURE LAND USE MAP 1.A AMENDED-DECEMBER 4,2007 ADOPTED-FEBRARY,1991 (ORD.NO 2007-77) i AMENDED-MAY 19.1992 AMENDED-OCTOBER 14.2008 ORD.NO.2008-59) AMENDED-MAY 25,1993 AMENDED-JULY 28,2010 AMENDED-JULY 27,1993 (ORD.NO 2010-31) AMENDED-JULY 26.2010 AMENDED-APRIL 12,1994 (ORD.NO 2010-32) AMENDED-MARCH 14.1995 AMENDED-SEPTEMBER 14.2011 rT3 ORD.NO.2011-29) AMENDED-OCTOBER 27.1997 AMENDED•NOVEMBER 18.2014 CC ORD NO 2014-41) 0 AMENDED-APRIL 14,1998 1. AMENDED-NOVEMBER 10.2015 0 73 AMENDED-SEPTEMBER 8.1998 (ORD.NO 2015.62) AMENDED-MAY 10,2016 4 0 AMENDED-FEBRUARY 23,1999 (ORD.NO.2016-12) 4; AMENDED-JUNE 13,2017 I-- AMENDED-MAY 9,2000 (ORD.NO.2017-23) AMENDED-MARCH 13.2001 AMENDED-XXXXX i 3/ AMENDED-MAY 14,2002 AMENDED-SEPTEMBER 10,2003 ( ORD.NO XXXX) ORD NO.200344) AMENDED-OCTOBER 26.2004 0 0.5 1 2 3 ORD.NO.2004-71) A Miles AMENDED-JANUARY 25,2005 ORD.NO 2005-3) ir.r4Z)'"*" AMENDED-JANUARY 25,2007 ORD NO 2007-19) XEW;:oose,vs)..2o)e-)csausurruxo NS- I R 26 E R 27 E I R 28 E I R 29 E 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 878 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) z0W c54pII" !- E1mJilliltSOYqaztanz. :,Al LWZ1=H-------H -- -DCOWOOJ . 10 LOGAN BOULEVARD =O K DvlKm 1 d i> LE: 0)/1 n artll1 P 40,V., _._.....___i r_i____ E 6 Eillali;;L' I- ----I 2) ( qi :::, 0 TDpafrmma WOO T_ 1CCO to—__N' 113CM]illfilllill% CD 31) 4-7111""."."-- V---:I 17TI IF7H' cn cb 0 A.AC 1 ate > 07 T ^ r a A ElI==11,...7 :› ) q s,1 m tog coTON O r 1 11 mtly Ti 110.,... -..„ CD jvZmrJI M:1•'b1oO W GDUN-NMI 9UE– 0 m• 3971-STREET SW I 39111 ST S.W. DivD > < 18 Tx K m0z0mmZ I W,tA z Z 0 oZz am 00 00 foa a a a , 0 li m m 1 o o o0D Oc0mOWD0 O mti0 IA 1 A (1; 1 7 O NNO vLo O v0 i i i C O p2A N vN A 1,1 N ra) N O O O S cnS L 5 5. n F 0 MCl CO J 0 2 2 CD N= W n VUI2IO'Id `AJ1NfOD IMITIOO N Z o LLaI2I.LSIQHIIS 'I'IIHNI 'IVIO2IHIAIYAIOD SHLLVZS I HLLVO N Q'IOO 00 N QNV LL3IIIISIGEMS 'ACINI lVI02IEIA[Y\IO3 NVEEII11 R,LV J NJQ'IOO 9.A.3.kPacket Pg. 879Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 000m0D A 00000101 ROAD LIMIOSTON ROADOsco ZNj< QOoADQncoY '_"ice p 8 ISO N F NrIIIIIIIlll` Ijmc GOOD EAR.DRAG 3uzSDAcoHC7mmNOa 7L r(')' B CD CIo y0TcO F is UokO O z A A2 o A a C b OPOERJ• Z LANE g L 7 til v m o CI m A g y m a S y uxsoN Ar A. j 2 A [IA v a) tj• 1-1 . Po 4 m v w X Z JAYBIRD WV i 02 go w til 0 TI el a C) 3Ch o INTERSTATE I-75 co NTE6TA E->5 v 1-3 tzl wk cm 1 i' s; s o z o C GA iLo Q 1C' Ni GA, a a , 0 0 i V m s 0 v N ti oS 999 iC N NAPA aouLawao 11 O i 1 Ow C7/T R, Nlo O oON CDCD Xm X n r t i 5 n mo , 5 m p 7C D N vci o g j m R 5 O fn cA z z v m R 1 10 10 V o 0 o A r W O N m Q N MNEYNNS /\ 1 9.A.3.kPacket Pg. 880Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 GOLDEN GATE ESTATES NEIGHBORHOOD CENTERS Collier County, Florida IMMOKALEE ROAD I d I OIL WELL ROAD IMMOKALEE ROAD J 0 J m ci W CO 0 Q Z 0O tn w Urban GOLDEN GATE BOULEVARD ElGoldenGateRuralGolden Estates Gate Estates WHITE BLVD. 0 J m a_ IBJ IJ0 0 INTERSTATE — 75 I AMENDED — SEPTEMBER 10, 2003 Ord. No. 2003-44) AMENDED — OCTOBER 26, 2004 Ord. No. 2004-71) AMENDED — JANUARY 25, 2007 GOLDEN GALE ESTATES Ord. No. 2007-19) NEIGHBORHOOD CENTERS 0 1 MI 2 MI AMENDED — OCTOBER 14, 2008 LEGEND Ord. No. 2008-59) PREPARED BY: GIS/CAD MAPPING SECTION NEIGHBORHOOD COMMUAl1,T,y,PMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION AMENDED — SoPTEMBER )14, 2011 CENTERS FILE: GGIu'(P 08-2.DWG DATE: 9/2011 Ord. No. 2011-29)Page 113 of 17n 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 881 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 No changes to map. COLLIER BOULEVARD/PINE RIDGE ROAD CENTER Collier County, Florida V NE T BEACH ROAD EXT. 1: 4V 7 D G T O 0. ir a PINE RIDGFI A / I • V R V ,V A / Q 1 CayF COQ/'PG Cg GI/P E-' j F O rn 4 ADOPTED - SEPTEMBER 10, 2003 LEGEND Ord. No. 2003-44) AMENDED - JANUARY 25, 2007 Ord. No. 2007-19) AMENDED - OCTOBER 14, 2008 Ord. No. 2008-59) j GOLDEN GATE 0 NEIGHBORHOODi 7/ ESTATES CENTER 1 1 I 0 1/2 MI. 1 MI. PREPARED BY: GRAPHICS AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT SECTION COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION FILE: GGMP-46-2008-1.DWG DATE: 10/2008 03/08/2019 Page 114 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 882 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan-BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 No changes to map. COMMERCIAL WESTERN ESTATES INFILL SUBDISTRICT Collier County, Florida N. NAPLES-IMMOKALEE ROAD W q F d d Fa1 COMMERCIAL E. WESTERN ESTATES °w INFILL SUBDISTRICT w BLT BEACH ROAD EXT. I/ 1 Gpp O L d DA PINE RIDGE/ `O• I E U 7.d AMENDED - SEPTEMBER 10, 2003 Ord. No. 2003-44)LEGEND AMENDED - OCTOBER 26, 2004 Ord. No. 2004-71) AMENDED - JANUARY 25, 2007 Ord. No. 2007-19) AMENDED - OCTOBER 14, 2008 Ord. No. 2008-59) j GOLDEN GATE ESTATES I I 0 1/2 MI. 1 MI. PREPARED BY: GRAPHICS AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT SECTION COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION FILE: GGMP-48-2008-1.DWG DATE: 10/2008 03/08/2019 Page 115 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 883 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 No changes to map. GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY INTERCHANGE CONDITIONAL USES AREA Collier County, Florida PINE RIDGE ROAD 1 v 7 F A a w a gw x 07.° GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY cll a 4 Ak a) 2 d U O z GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY a INTERCHANGE CONDITIONAL a USES AREA F RADIO ROAD O a. x d DAVIS BOULEVARD EXT. ADOPTED — SEPTEMBER 10, 2003 LEGEND Ord. No. 2003-44) AMENDED — JANUARY 25, 2007 Ord. No. 2007-19) AMENDED — OCTOBER 14, 2008 Ord. No. 2008-59) i X GOLDEN GATE ESTATES I I I 0 1/2 MI. 1 MI. PREPARED BY: GRAPHICS AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT SECTION COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION FILE: GGMP-49-2008-1.DWG DATE: 10/2008 03/08/2019 Page 116 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 884 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) gRsH 'Eo4CODiDiMS1Sy85II H _ QarU ES, x ! d Y S II:< Mrn1z c zIQ n II0 0 z zEO 2 10 UO n Ns';aNN N N Z U U Z MOOZ MS SS 4159 MS SS 4159 I u Oo 1 C 0 N Z<a d Z.w 2'ao C' L>-oN 3 O N g w z a o>2 . 1oa A = ocoo g9.A.3.kPacket Pg. 885Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) NO rIvegD#1iajgendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 SOUTHBROOKE OFFICE SUBDISTRICT Collier County, Florida IMMOKALEE ROAD SOUTHBROOKE OFFICE SUBDISTRICT VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD J 0 • A L z i PINE RIDGE / r• e ' •'D N 1 rwA o I- mw JD Q O W CO Q m w m w 00. 0 t T' P;' A / Q o j I- U Z I_ N LEGEND AMENDED — NOVEMBER 10, 2015 Ord. No. 2015-62) GOLDEN GATE SOUTHBROOKE Q OFFICE ESTATES SUBDISTRICT PREPARED BY: GIS/CAD MAPPING SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NTS FILE: CPSS-2014-4A-1.DWG DATE: 1-2016 03/08/2019 Page 1 18 o11/0 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 886 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 0 I-1-coco coa NDW coc/)) 1 75 dDDam ZdQQ P. ploo, o Nz Z41 p,W O0_1ZJW ill 00 1,,44sps itt MSI a pi,Z Cl) c„,),.. 1t1l 11\ iA o E,_, .!,a p W Ei 'SIMeri 4PRILimmnimminui U• zzp 0 31 co SBARBARABLVD.mAooaap pU iiao as U p v c...) o 0AQN wio 13 W4 4,3400 Z a w CI 0 4Il E0.4E)AhNI CD0EWNCZH0Wh0oVCOaU,aCO? 0aCoCOEECw¢aCZgwUC5-cnZzJom¢co AgIII0WINa. iiii—x00 9.A.3.kPacket Pg. 887Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed DraiPRrrr6rlsXC TfiaWbTAPEtircdkldkTIPNAL C-1filiN61/CPSP-2018-2 IN GOLDEN GATE ESTATES MMONALEERD Legend mc>I©aBzitoausalmm Islimmt104:::::::/1 Conditional Use Exceptions I®IO2 SL•3` om©omc :/®, off:: :O' ' ', Tract 22, Unit 97 o©©9Q9fc8SEER1 EIG::a 1 R10122E9EEE5:1 , 0, Ls3m000:11411=11{11'. W o 11731111101:111111111:11, mo©e 9Q em®. 114112999999E1:1111 1 3 11111:141:111:11110•:1111111VANDERBILT BEACH RD B m nm muuu36 mm 9697 nzn°+z:® R i: 43 A m +,zz ,on axum 36,+,.97 m 1'3 79m9696,,,,.+z 90 96 R.an= A} _ 89595 1911 124 12 21 28 37 um aza num,0o,w115 es 10 sIN m . aaA an«mmmamm,°„°°„7 12 H i011z11 am 36us, BR 54 A n 75 88 9110210711812 e. mmmOmmm u w w,0509113n osdD , e°> A - a II In 9596 2., 1 nrzmem 17 17 32 33 46 49 64 36 63®I IIF' .:6 Ella 31 34 47 93 33 86 79 82 95 38 11111412 a ea mo©e129G1: w':°;;A 7 85 B s° n ® .,94 1131 mE.w NR` "® teA°mm, „,1IBB 1 18 '• ,am«:92976II e981SE33 41 aa 57 ea nBo 55 a miewIlebnstLTJw' i e om0000©o a L. I 0demm7479m 5,°°,. a bawum3671e 14 27 SO 43 46 59 62 73 76 91 I A 73 66 z 1 L rvrgstr Wpoda LN , a R m,. o„u , m u«I a m am 12 13 a a« man973 PINE RIDGE R0 n nm - mo m m e mw 36 ,,°, 11 "/ Na95W11s;s.. 97, AV,°w, ® a 8481629340°7,°,5 II3.2 n o ®®36 m z mwmn 3695114 ® IN 0 : .ss 95950VM,0°,039,e95 ' ' 96 •• , , z ««w uuu « z •95,:79«seaa,za 80Bli1322 «ma 3696,°z,°,Bw«wm7,3630, . ,,, 35mm36;, 95 s ,,., ,,„ 786356•°34Al2 • z,m. m. od I4'.°,no- r 0 . 15mB 67n• 76977676959597 .° ' , ,,,,wmn3636umm„° 5205,3647526397 79 SI wm 1716;:011 96897667««3223107 3, HI 16 19 4851«67 en 9, mu36 mm 9397 1.112 , . 5e , 10122 z , 11 11.97907536 m 4831x40°nz i6O ,avn ms,7•wv 119576,ea n,emwmmmmm 959796 I 0 K 79 76 , .a he LNw o. la II_ ii 955,487695,97 2 oaamn m mn].m96,o E. 48 5.79 a 959509769595, 13 ,,,,°09366736««2322, ,m 7 s =+769548 m, ns LN wt00r='S _- , z mmmmmuz•z,z nma p61 39 67,60.95". — 1 lie tr - n.e,m munuam° 178e 1A5N96® North 180 feet of m 769595«76,5. , I 0„nmmm«'"'9695 ract 107, Unit 3 . z w7"mmmn„ n° 0 m as ma a100 , 0 "7623 . s s r--sf LN i0 , a. — z m m w ane 175 I I 0I 959597„0995,0,- it 5 a 36p3 erme mn mm „i11,,., 5a 3667].95 9595 i° y WOJ,, 1195 97,°, 11. 12 10 x w n w Ie l - 36 f11L« N95, 0o- Ha 15 a 115 11 20 41 m n m 111 01 0.97ma96mm°,«2 n] 0Y s f ...,,,,L, m I 019679 76675.33321310 n, L mm w°'w m 36.97 m m zaw36 mrzm96m36mmm mmmm ' a «. mmms1 96 4 27 1 f 170 n « m ,,.N y :yem, 7, aNmm ,5eII, s j --J r ADOPTED-XXXX PREPARED BY:BETH YANG,AICP Ord.No.:000() GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT Miles FILE:Special Exceptions to Conditional Use.mxd DATE:05/2018 N 0 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 o 120 of 170pa03/08/2019 9 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 888 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN RURAL GOLDEN GATE ESTATES SUB-ELEMENT Prepared by Collier County Zoning Division Prepared for COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Adopted (date) Words underlined are added;words stuelf-thfeugh are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 121 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 889 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element AMENDMENTS TO COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN: RURAL GOLDEN GATE ESTATES SUB-ELEMENT DATE AMENDED ORDINANCE NO. date), 2019 2019-(#) ii Words underlined are added;words ugh are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 122 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 890 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element TABLE OF CONTENTS Page A. Goals, Oblectives and Policies 1 B. Land Use Designation Description Section 13 1. ESTATES DESIGANATION 13 A. Estates— Mixed Use District 1. Residential Estates Subdistrict 2. Neighborhood Center Subdistrict 3. Conditional Uses Subdistrict 4. Mission Subdistrict 5. Everglades— Randall Subdistrict B. Estates—Commercial District 1. Randall Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict 2. Estates Shopping Center Subdistrict 2. AGRICULTURE/RURAL DESIGNATION 30 A. Rural Settlement Area District 3. OVERLAYS AND SPECIAL FEAUTURES 31 A. Southern Golden Gate Estates Natural Resource Protection Overlay C. List of Maps 32 Golden Gate Area Future Land Use Map Golden Gate Estates Neighborhood Centers Wilson Boulevard/Golden Gate Boulevard Center Golden Gate Boulevard/Everglades Boulevard Center Immokalee Road/Everglades Boulevard Center Randall Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict Mission Subdistrict Estates Shopping Center Subdistrict Estates Shopping Center Subdistrict Conceptual Plan Everglades— Randall Subdistrict Immokalee Road/Randall Boulevard Planning Study Area Words underlined are added;words stuelk-through are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 123 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 891 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element A. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES GOAL 1: TO GUIDE LAND USE AND PUBLIC FACILITY DECISION MAKING AND TO BALANCE THE NEED TO PROVIDE BASIC SERVICES WITH NATURAL RESOURCE CONCERNS THROUGH A WELL PLANNED MIX OF COMPATIBLE LAND USES WHICH ENSURE THE HEALTH, SAFETY, WELFARE,AND QUALITY OF LIFE OF THE LOCAL RESIDENTS. OBJECTIVE 1.1: Develop new or revised uses of land consistent with designations outlined on the Rural Golden Gate Estates Future Land Use Map and provisions found in the Land Use Designation Description Section of this Sub-Element. Policy 1.1.1: The Policies under the above Objective shall identify the Future Land Use Designations, Districts, and Subdistricts for the Rural Golden Gate Estates. Policy 1.1.2: The Land Use Designation Description Section of this Element shall provide the standards and permitted uses for Rural Golden Gate Estates Future Land Use Districts and Subdistricts. Policy 1.1.3: The Rural Golden Gate Estates Future Land Use Map and companion Future Land Use Designations, Districts, and Subdistricts shall be binding on all development orders unless otherwise permitted in this Master Plan effective with the adoption of this Master Plan. Policy 1.1.4: The ESTATES Future Land Use Designation shall include Future Land Use Districts and Subdistricts for: A. ESTATES—MIXED USE DISTRICT 1. Residential Estates Subdistrict 2. Neighborhood Center Subdistrict 3. Conditional Uses Subdistrict 4. Mission Subdistrict 5. Everglades— Randall Subdistrict B. ESTATES—COMMERCIAL DISTRICT 1. Randall Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict 2. Estates Shopping Center Subdistrict Policy 1.1.5: The AGRICULTURAL/RURAL Future Land Use Designation shall include the following Future Land Use District: A. RURAL SETTLEMENT AREA DISTRICT Policy 1.1.6: Overlays and Special Features shall include: 1 Words underlined are added;words Stu ugh are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 124 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 892 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element A. Southern Golden Gate Estates Natural Resource Protection Area Overlay Policy 1.1.7: Conditional Use requests within Rural Golden Gate Estates shall adhere to the guidelines outlined in the Conditional Uses Subdistrict. Policy 1.1.8: To obtain Conditional Use approval, a super majority vote (minimum of 4 votes) by the Board of Zoning Appeals shall be required. Policy 1.1.9: No development orders shall be issued inconsistent with the Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub- Element with the exception of those unimproved properties granted a positive determination through the Zoning Re-evaluation Program and identified on the Future Land Use Map Series as properties consistent by Policy and those development orders issued pursuant to conditional uses and rezones approved based on the County-Wide Future Land Use Element (adopted January 10, 1989, Ordinance 89-05) which was in effect at the time of approval. Any subsequent development orders shall also be reviewed for consistency with the Growth Management Plan based on the County-Wide Future Land Use Element. Policy 1.1.10: The sites containing existing public educational plants and ancillary plants, and the undeveloped sites owned by the Collier County School Board for future public educational plants and ancillary plants, within the Rural Golden Gate Estates area, are depicted on the Future Land Use Map Series in the countywide FLUE and on the Public School Facilities Element Map Series, and referenced in FLUE Policy 5.14 and Intergovernmental Coordination Element Policy 1.2.6. All of these sites are subject to the general Interlocal Agreement, adopted on May 15, 2003 by the Collier County School Board and on May 27, 2003 by the Board of County Commissioners, and as subsequently amended and restated, with an effective date of December 2008, and subject to the implementing land development regulations to be adopted. OBJECTIVE 1.2: Ensure public facilities are provided at an acceptable level of service. Policy 1.2.1: Requests for new uses of land shall be subject to level of service standards and concurrency requirements for public facilities as outlined in the Capital Improvement Element of the Growth Management Plan. OBJECTIVE 1.3: Protect and preserve the valuable natural resources within the Rural Golden Gate Estates. Policy 1.3.1: The County shall protect and preserve natural resources within the Rural Golden Gate Estates in accordance with the Objectives and Policies contained within Goals 6 and 7 of the Collier County Conservation and Coastal Management Element(CCME). Policy 1.3.2: As provided for in CCME Policy 6.1.1, the subdivision of tracts up to 13 acres in size and designated Residential Estates Subdistrict shall not trigger preserve requirements. 2 Words underlined are added;words st=aek through are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 125 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 893 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element Policy 1.3.3: Collier County shall coordinate its planning and permitting activities within the Rural Golden Gate Estates with all other applicable environmental planning, permitting and regulatory agencies to ensure that all Federal,State and local natural resource protection regulations are being enforced. OBJECTIVE 1.4: Provide a living environment within the Rural Golden Gate Estates, which is aesthetically acceptable and protects the quality of life. Policy 1.4.1: Collier County shall provide a living environment that is aesthetically acceptable and protects the quality of life through the enforcement of applicable codes and laws. Policy 1.4.2: The County's Code Enforcement Board shall strictly enforce the Land Development Code and other applicable codes and laws to control the illegal storage of machinery,vehicles and iunk, and the illegal operation of commercial activities within the Rural Golden Gate Estates. GOAL 2: TO RECOGNIZE THAT THE AREA WHICH LIES SOUTH OF INTERSTATE 75 (ALLIGATOR ALLEY) TO US 41 (TAMIAMI TRAIL) IS AN AREA OF SPECIAL ENVIRONMENTAL SENSITIVITY AND IS BIOLOGICALLY AND HYDROLOGICALLY IMPORTANT THROUGH PARTICIPATION IN THE PICAYUNE STRAND RESTORATION PROJECT AS PART OF THE FEDERAL SAVE OUR EVERGLADES PROGRAM. BASED UPON SUCH CONDITIONS, THE STATE HAS ACQUIRED OWNERSHIP OF ALL LANDS WITHIN THE SOUTHERN GOLDEN GATE ESTATES (SGGE) PICAYUNE STRAND RESTORATION PROJECT AREA. GOAL 3: TO PROVIDE FOR LIMITED COMMERCIAL SERVICES AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR PURPOSES OF SERVING THE RURAL NEEDS OF GOLDEN GATE ESTATES RESIDENTS, SHORTENING VEHICULAR TRIPS,AND PRESERVING RURAL CHARACTER. OBJECTIVE 3.1: Meet the locational and rural design criteria contained within the Estates Designation, Estates- Mixed Use District, Neighborhood Center Subdistrict and Conditional Use Subdistrict of this Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element, of the Collier County Growth Management Plan when considering the placement and designation of Neighborhood Centers and Conditional Uses within Rural Golden Gate Estates. Policy 3.1.1: Neighborhood Centers within Rural Golden Gate Estates shall be subject to the locational and rural design criteria established within the Estates Designation, Estates — Mixed Use District, Neighborhood Center Subdistrict of this Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element, of the Collier County Growth Management Plan. 3 Words underlined are added;words stuff are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 126 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 894 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element Policy 3.1.2: Conditional Uses within Rural Golden Gate Estates shall be subject to locational and dimensional criteria established within the Conditional Use Subdistrict in the Land Use Designation Description section of this Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element. OBJECTIVE 3.2: Provide for new commercial development within Neighborhood Centers and other Commercial Land Use Designations. Policy 3.2.1: Within one year of the completion of the Randall Blvd. and Oil Well Rd. Corridor study, the County Manager or designee shall initiate an evaluation of the future land uses along Immokalee Rd. in the vicinity of Randall Blvd., Oil Well Rd. and Wilson Blvd. (as generally shown on the Immokalee Rd./Randall Blvd. Planning Study Area Map) and make recommendations to the Board of County Commissioners for any proposed changes to the future land uses. GOAL 4: TO PRESERVE THE AREA'S RURAL CHARACTER, AS DEFINED BY LARGE WOODED LOTS, THE KEEPING OF LIVESTOCK, THE ABILITY TO GROW CROPS, WILDLIFE ACTIVITY, ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP, LOW-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, AND LIMITATIONS ON COMMERCIAL AND CONDITIONAL USES. OBJECTIVE 4.1: Balance the provision of public infrastructure with the need to preserve the rural character of Rural Golden Gate Estates. Policy 4.1.1: Future road and bridge improvements in Rural Golden Gate Estates shall not only provide for safety and reasonable mobility, but shall also contribute to the rural character of the area. Transportation improvements shall be designed in context with their setting. Policy 4.1.2 The County shall initiate architectural standard requirements in the Land Development Code within two years of adoption that apply to commercial, conditional use and essential services facilities, reflecting the rural character of the Estates area and providing coherence and area identity. Policy 4.1.3: The County Manager or designee shall create a public network of greenway corridors within Rural Golden Gate Estates that interconnects public lands and permanently protected green space. The greenway network shall consist of interconnected trails and paths that allow people to move about the Estates area by means other than motorized vehicles. All greenways shall be constructed within existing or future public easements or rights-of-way. In creating the greenway network, the County shall not employ eminent domain proceedings. OBJECTIVE 4.2: Provide for the protection of the rural character of Rural Golden Gate Estates. 4 Words underlined are added;words stuck eugh are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 127 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 895 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element Policy 4.2.1: Rural character protection provisions shall provide for the preservation of such rural amenities as, but not limited to, wooded lots, the keeping of livestock, the ability to grow crops, wildlife activity, and low-density residential development. Policy 4.2.2: The growing of food crops and/or the keeping of livestock on properties within Rural Golden Gate Estates shall be permitted, provided that such activities are conducted according to the Land Development Code. Policy 4.2.3: Rural character shall be further protected by resisting site-specific Master Plan changes that are out of scale or character with the rural quality of Rural Golden Gate Estates. Policy 4.2.4: Recognizing the low density in Rural Golden Gate Estates, the County will initiate a review of written notification requirements in the Land Development Code and the Administrative Code related to land use petitions in Golden Gate Estates, within 1 year of adoption, and consider increasing the specified distance, with particular attention to properties located on dead-end streets. Policy 4.2.5: Consistent with public safety requirements and best practices for rural areas, outdoor lighting within Rural Golden Gate Estates shall be placed, constructed and maintained in such manner as to prevent or reduce light pollution. In implementing this Policy, the County shall: a. Adhere to the"Collier County Lighting Standards"(County Manager's Office Standards dated January 6, 2017)as amended,with respect to new and existing County owned or maintained sites and structures. b. Continue to coordinate with FPL and FDOT to improve roadway and security lighting consistent with International Dark Skies Association best practices. c. Consider changes to the Land Development Code and other applicable ordinances to create voluntary or mandatory outdoor lighting standards for commercial, residential or other uses consistent with International Dark Skies Association best practices, and determine the extent such standards apply to new or existing development. OBJECTIVE 4.3: Encourage the preservation of natural resources in Rural Golden Gate Estates, including protection and enhancement of its watershed. Policy 4.3.1: The Land Development Code shall continue to allow and further encourage the preservation of native vegetation and wildlife indigenous to the Rural Golden Gate Estates. Policy 4.3.2: The County shall continue to pursue the Watershed Management Plan initiatives in Rural Golden Gate Estates as financial and staff resources become available. Policy 4.3.3: The County shall encourage the combination of parcels smaller than 2.25 acres with other parcels in order to preserve and enhance low-density environmental advantages. Within two years of 5 Words underlined are added;words stuelf-thfeugh are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 128 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 896 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element adoption of this policy, County staff will present recommendations for property owner incentives to the Board of County Commissioners. Policy 4.3.4: The County will evaluate the use of transferable development rights for the purpose of securing the preservation of wetland or other environmentally significant land within Rural Golden Gate Estates, in a timeframe directed by the Board. Policy 4.3.5: Within two years of adoption, the County, in coordination with the Floodplain Management Committee,will initiate a study on the feasibility of dispersed water management(DWM)for single family Estates lots, and determine the extent to which it will rely on voluntary, incentive or mandatory provisions and whether provisions will apply to developed and undeveloped Estates parcels. Policy 4.3.6: The County will continue to identify and implement educational opportunities related to water resources for parcel owners, homeowners, builders, real estate professionals and the public to aid in understanding and addressing site-specific financial and environmental impacts as well as area-wide impacts to water resources. Policy 4.3.7: The County will periodically coordinate with the South Florida Water Management District to review the Level of Service Standards for primary water management canals within the County and their effect on Rural Golden Gate Estates. Policy 4.3.8: The County shall continue to pursue a best management practices approach to making septage treatment available to residents and businesses within Rural Golden Gate Estates, as a component of bio-solid processing, either directly, through a private entity, or through a public- private partnership. GOAL 5: TO PROVIDE FOR A SAFE AND EFFICIENT COUNTY AND LOCAL ROADWAY NETWORK, WHILE AT THE SAME TIME SEEKING TO PRESERVE THE RURAL CHARACTER OF RURAL GOLDEN GATE ESTATES IN FUTURE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE GOLDEN GATE AREA. OBJECTIVE 5.1: Increase the number of route alternatives for traffic moving through the Rural Golden Gate Estates Area in both east-west and north-south directions, consistent with neighborhood traffic safety considerations, and consistent with the preservation of the area's rural character. Policy 5.1.1: In planning to increase the number of route alternatives through the Rural Golden Gate Estates Area, Collier County will prioritize the following routes over other alternatives: a. The extension of Vanderbilt Beach Road from its current terminus to DeSoto Boulevard. b. The development of a north-south connection from the eastern terminus of White Boulevard to Golden Gate Boulevard. c. The development of a new east-west roadway crossing the Estates Area south of Golden Gate Boulevard. 6 Words underlined are added;words steek-through are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 129 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 897 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element Policy 5.1.2: The County shall coordinate with FDOT and the Metropolitan Planning Organization to submit a revised interchange iustification report for an interchange at 1-75 in the vicinity of Everglades Blvd. Section 31-34, Township 49, Range 28). Policy 5.1.3: Everglades Blvd., between Golden Gate Blvd and 1-75, shall not be expanded beyond 4 lanes. OBJECTIVE 5.2: Increase linkages within the local road system for the purposes of limiting traffic on arterials and major collectors within Rural Golden Gate Estates, shortening vehicular trips, and increasing overall road system capacity. Policy 5.2.1: The County shall continue to explore alternative financing methods to facilitate both east- west and north-south bridging of canals within Rural Golden Gate Estates. Policy 5.2.2: The County shall update the 2008 Bridge Study to prioritize bridge construction based on emergency response times, evacuation times, cost components, anticipated development patterns and other considerations and shall report its recommendations to the Board of County Commissioners within two years of adoption of this policy. Policy 5.2.3: Planning and right-of-way acquisition for bridges within the Estates Area local road system shall include consideration of the costs and benefits of including sidewalks and bike lanes. Policy 5.2.4: Sidewalks and bike lanes shall provide access to government facilities, schools, commercial areas and the planned Metropolitan Planning Organization greenway network. Policy 5.2.5: Planning, funding and implementation of potential greenway trails shall be coordinated between the County and the Metropolitan Planning Organization. OBJECTIVE 5.3: Explore alternative financing methods to accelerate paving of lime rock roads. Policy 5.3.1: The County will consider the acceleration of the paving of lime rock roads, including a cost/benefit analysis, in its annual budget review. GOAL 6: TO PROTECT THE LIVES AND PROPERTY OF THE RESIDENTS OF THE RURAL GOLDEN GATE ESTATES,AS WELL AS THE HEALTH OF THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT, THROUGH THE PROVISION OF EMERGENCY SERVICES THAT PREPARE FOR, MITIGATE, AND RESPOND TO, NATURAL AND MANMADE DISASTERS. 7 Words underlined are added;words are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 130 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 898 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPS P-2018-2 Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element OBJECTIVE 6.1: Coordinate with local emergency services officials in engineering and constructing road improvements within Rural Golden Gate Estates to ensure that the access needs of fire department, police and emergency management personnel and vehicles are met. Policy 6.1.1: Collier County shall hold at least one annual public meeting with Golden Gate Area emergency services providers and the local civic association in order to ensure that emergency needs are addressed during the acquisition of right-of-way for design and construction of road improvements. Policy 6.1.2: Collier County shall continue to coordinate with Golden Gate Area emergency services providers to prioritize necessary road improvements related to emergency evacuation needs. OBJECTIVE 6.2: Ensure that the needs of all applicable emergency services providers are included and coordinated in the overall public project design for capital improvement projects within the Rural Golden Gate Estates. Policy 6.2.1: Preparation of Collier County's annual Schedule of Capital Improvements for projects within the Rural Golden Gate Estates shall be coordinated with the independent Fire Districts that serve Rural Golden Gate Estates (Fire Districts), public and private utilities, Emergency Medical Services Department and the Collier County Sheriff's Department to ensure that public project designs are consistent with the needs of these agencies. Policy 6.2.2: Fire Districts, Collier County Emergency Medical Services Department and the Collier County Sheriff's Department will receive copies of pre-construction plans for capital improvement projects in Rural Golden Gate Estates and will be invited to review and comment on plans for the public projects. OBJECTIVE 6.3: Maintain and implement public information programs through the Collier County Bureau of Emergency Services, Collier County Sheriff's Department, Fire Districts, and other appropriate agencies, to inform residents and visitors of the Greater Golden Gate Area regarding the means to prevent, prepare for, and cope with, man-made and natural disasters. Policy 6.3.1: The Fire Districts that serve the Golden Gate area, and other appropriate agencies, shall embark on an education program to assist residents in knowing and understanding the value and need for prescribed burning on public lands in high risk fire areas. Policy 6.3.2: The Fire Districts and Collier County Bureau of Emergency Services shall actively promote the Firewise Communities Program through public education in Rural Golden Gate Estates. 8 Words underlined are added;words st}reltrrough are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 131 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 899 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/C PSP-2018-2 Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element Policy 6.3.3 Fire Districts and the Collier County Bureau of Emergency Services shall hold one or more annual open house" presentations in the Golden Gate Area emphasizing issues related to wildfires, flooding, emergency access and general emergency management. OBJECTIVE 6.4: Pursue appropriate planning and mitigation measures to address the threat of wildfires in Rural Golden Gate Estates. Policy 6.4.1: Collier County shall evaluate the Land Development Code for Rural Golden Gate Estates requirements that are found to be inconsistent with acceptable fire prevention standards. This evaluation process shall be coordinated with the Fire Districts and the Collier County Bureau of Emergency Services. Policy 6.4.2: Within one year of adoption, the County shall begin to evaluate the need to purchase or dedicate parcels within Rural Golden Gate Estates for the purpose of providing staging areas for wildfire prevention activities for the Florida Forest Service, Fire Districts, Collier County or other agency use and will consider whether potential parcels may be used for other public purposes including ride sharing or park and ride facilities allowed by Conditional Use. Policy 6.4.3: The County shall explore annually, options for funding wildfire prevention measures undertaken by the County, Florida Forest Service and/or Fire Districts, including but not limited to Golden Gate Estates Municipal Services Taxing Units (MSTU) revenue, grant funding and general fund revenue. Policy 6.4.4: The County shall review annually and update as necessary, all interlocal agreements and mutual aid agreements to assure coordination of legal, procedural and educational components of wildfire prevention. Policy 6.4.5: County-owned property within Rural Golden Gate Estates shall be subiect to an active, on-going management plan to reduce the damage caused by wildfires originating from County-owned properties. REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK1 9 Words underlined are added;words stuelt-through are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 132 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 900 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element B. LAND USE DESIGNATION DESCRIPTION SECTION The following section describes the three land use designations shown on the Rural Golden Gate Estates Future Land Use Map. These designations generally indicate the types of land uses for which zoning may be requested. However, these land use designations do not guarantee that a zoning request will be approved. Requests may be denied by the Board of County Commissioners based on criteria in the Land Development Code or in special studies completed for the County. 1. ESTATES DESIGNATION This designation is characterized by low density semi-rural residential lots with limited opportunities for other land uses. Typical lots are 2.25 acres in size. However,there are some legal non-conforming lots as small as 1.14 acres. Residential density is limited to a maximum of one unit per 2.25 gross acres, or one unit per legal non-conforming lot of record, exclusive of guesthouses. Multiple family dwelling units, duplexes, and other structures containing two or more principal dwellings, are prohibited in all Districts and Subdistricts in this Designation. Generally, the Estates Designation also accommodates future non-residential uses, including: a. Conditional uses and essential services as defined in the Land Development Code, except as prohibited in the Neighborhood Center Subdistrict. Also, refer to the Conditional Uses Subdistrict. b. Parks, open space and recreational uses. c. Group Housing shall be permitted subject to the definitions and regulations as outlined in the Collier County Land Development Code (Ordinance No. 04-41, as amended) and consistent with locational requirements in Florida Statutes(Chapter 419.001 F.S.). d. Schools and school facilities in the Estates Designation north of 1-75, and where feasible and mutually acceptable, co-locate schools with other public facilities, such as parks, libraries and community centers to the extent possible. Group Housing includes the following type facilities: aa. Family Care Facility if occupied by not more than six(6) persons shall be permitted in residential areas. bb. Group Care Facility, cc. Care Units, dd.Adult Congregate Living Facilities, and ee. Nursing Homes. All of the above uses shall be consistent with all of the Goals, Objectives and Policies of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan. A. Estates—Mixed-Use District 1. Residential Estates Subdistrict Single-family residential development is allowed within this Subdistrict at a maximum density of one unit per 2.25 gross acres, or one unit per legal non-conforming lot of record, exclusive of guesthouses. 2. Neighborhood Center Subdistrict Recognizing the need to provide basic goods, services and amenities to Estates residents, Neighborhood Centers have been designated on the Rural Golden Gate 10 Words underlined are added;words stuck eugh are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 133 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 901 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element Estates Future Land Use Map. The Neighborhood Center designation does not guarantee that commercial zoning will be granted. The designation only provides the opportunity to request commercial zoning. a. The Collier County Land Development Code shall be amended to provide rural design criteria to regulate all new commercial development within Neighborhood Centers. b. Locations Neighborhood Centers are located along major roadways and are distributed within Rural Golden Gate Estates according to commercial demand estimates. See Golden Gate Estates Neighborhood Centers Map). The centers are designed to concentrate all new commercial zoning, and conditional uses, as allowed in the Estates Zoning District, in locations where traffic impacts can be readily accommodated and to avoid strip and disorganized patterns of commercial and conditional use development. Three Neighborhood Centers are established as follows: i. Wilson Boulevard and Golden Gate Boulevard Center. This center consists of three quadrants at the intersection of Wilson and Golden Gate Boulevards (See Map 10). The NE and SE quadrants of the Center consist of Tract 1 and 2, Unit 14, Tract 17, Unit 13 and the western half of Tract 18, Unit 13 Golden Gate Estates. The NE quadrant of Wilson and Golden Gate Boulevards is approximately 8.45 acres. The parcels within the NE quadrant shall be interconnected and share access to Golden Gate Boulevard and Wilson Boulevard to minimize connections to these two major roadways. The SE quadrant of Wilson and Golden Gate Boulevards is 7.15 acres, allows 5.00 acres of commercial development, and allocates 2.15 acres to project buffering and right-of-way for Golden Gate Boulevard and Wilson Boulevard. The SW quadrant of the Center is approximately 11.78 acres in size and consists of Tract 124, 125, and the north 150 feet of Tract 126, Unit 12 of Golden Gate Estates. ii. Everglades Boulevard and Golden Gate Boulevard Center. This Center consists of all four quadrants at the intersection of Everglades and Golden Gate Boulevards (See Golden Gate Boulevard/Everglades Boulevard Center Map). The NE quadrant of the Center is approximately 5.46 acres in size and consists of Tract 1, Unit 77 of Golden Gate Estates. The SE quadrant of the Center is approximately 5.46 acres in size and consists of Tract 97, Unit 81 of Golden Gate Estates. The NW quadrant of the Center is approximately 5.46 acres in size and consists of Tract 128, Unit 76 of Golden Gate Estates. The SW quadrant of the Center is approximately 5.46 acres in size and consists of Tract 96, Unit 81 of Golden Gate Estates. iii. The Immokalee Road and Everglades Boulevard Center This Center is located in the southwest and the southeast quadrants of the intersection. This Center consists of three Tracts: Tract 128, Unit 47, is 5.15 acres and is located within the southwest quadrant of the Center, south of the fire station; and, Tracts 113 and 16, Unit 46, are 4.05 +acres and 5.15 + acres respectively, and are within the southeast quadrant of the Center, east of the fire station. 11 Words underlined are added;words 3tuelt4lifettgh are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 134 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 902 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element c. Criteria for land uses at the centers are as follows: i. Commercial uses shall be limited to intermediate commercial so as to provide for a wider variety of goods and services in areas that have a higher degree of automobile traffic. These uses shall be similar to C-1, C-2, or C-3 zoning districts outlined in the Collier County Land Development Code(Ordinance No. 04-41, as amended), except as prohibited below. ii. Parcels immediately adjacent to commercial zoning within the Neighborhood Centers located at the intersections Golden Gate Boulevard and Wilson Boulevard (excluding the SW quadrant), Golden Gate Boulevard and Everglades Boulevard, Everglades Boulevard and Immokalee Road may qualify for Conditional Use under the transitional conditional use provision of the Conditional Uses Subdistrict of this Master Plan Element. iv. A single project shall utilize no more than 50% of the total allowed commercial acreage. This percentage may be increased at the discretion of the Board of County Commissioners. v. The project shall make provisions for shared parking arrangements with adjoining developments. vi. Access points shall be limited to one per 180 feet commencing from the right- of-way of the major intersecting streets of the Neighborhood Center. A maximum of three curb cuts per quadrant shall be allowed. vii. Driveways and curb cuts shall be consolidated with adjoining developments, whenever possible. viii. Driveways accessing parcels on opposite sides of the roadway shall be in direct alignment, except when the roadway median between the two parcels has no opening. ix. Projects shall provide a 25-foot wide landscape buffer abutting the external right-of-way. This buffer shall contain two staggered rows of trees that shall be spaced no more than 30 feet on center, and a double row hedge at least 24 inches in height at time of planting and attaining a minimum of three feet height within one year. A minimum of 50% of the 25-foot wide buffer area shall be comprised of a meandering bed of shrubs and ground covers other than grass. Existing native trees must be retained within this 25-foot wide buffer area to aid in achieving this buffer requirement; other existing native vegetation shall be retained, where possible, to aid in achieving this buffer requirement. Water retention/detention areas shall be allowed in this buffer area if left in natural state, and drainage conveyance through the buffer area shall be allowed if necessary to reach an external outfall. a. All buildings shall have tile roofs, 'Old Style Florida' metal roofs, or decorative parapet walls above the roofline. The buildings shall be finished in light, subdued colors, except for decorative trim. x. Building heights shall be limited to one (1) story, with a maximum height of thirty-five (35)feet. This provision only applies east of Collier Boulevard. xi. All lighting facilities shall be architecturally—designed, and shall be limited to a height of twenty-five (25) feet. Such lighting facilities shall be shielded from neighboring residential land uses and consistent with Policy 5.2.4. 12 Words underlined are added;words stuff are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 135 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 903 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element xii. Commercial uses shall encourage pedestrian traffic through placement of sidewalks, pedestrian walkways, and marked crosswalks within parking areas. Adjacent projects shall coordinate placement of sidewalks so that a continuous pathway through the Neighborhood Center is created. xiii. All buildings and projects within any single specific quadrant of the Subdistrict shall utilize a common architectural theme. This theme shall be applicable to both building design and signage. xiv. No building footprint shall exceed 5,000 square feet, unless the project is submitted in the form of a PUD. Walkways or courtyards shall connect adjacent buildings. This provision only applies east of Collier Boulevard. xv. Drive-through establishments shall be limited to banks, with no more than 3 lanes; the drive-through areas shall be architecturally integrated with the rest of the building. This provision only applies east of Collier Boulevard. xvi. Fences or walls may be constructed on the commercial side of the required landscape buffer between adjacent commercial and residential uses. If constructed, such fences or walls shall not exceed five (5)feet in height. Walls shall be constructed of brick or stone. Fences shall be of wood or concrete post or rail types, and shall be of open design (not covered by slats, boards or wire). xvii. Projects directly abutting residential property (property zoned E-Estates and without an approved conditional use) shall provide, at a minimum, a seventy- five (75)feet wide buffer in which no parking uses are permitted. Twenty-five 25) feet of the width of the buffer along the developed area shall be a landscape buffer. A minimum of fifty (50)feet of the buffer width shall consist of retained native vegetation and must be consistent with subsection 3.05.07H. of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC). The native vegetation retention area may consist of a perimeter berm and be used for water management detention. Any newly constructed berm shall be revegetated to meet subsection 3.05.07H. of the LDC (native vegetation replanting requirements). Additionally, in order to be considered for approval, use of the native vegetation retention area for water management purposes shall meet the following criteria: a. There shall be no adverse impacts to the native vegetation being retained. The additional water directed to this area shall not increase the annual hydro-period unless it is proven that such would have no adverse impact to the existing vegetation. b. If the project requires permitting by the South Florida Water Management District, the project shall provide a letter or official document from the District indicating that the native vegetation within the retention area will not have to be removed to comply with water management requirements. If the District cannot or will not supply such a letter,then the native vegetation retention area shall not be used for water management. c. If the proiect is reviewed by Collier County, the County engineer shall provide evidence that no removal of native vegetation is necessary to facilitate the necessary storage of water in the water management area. xix. Projects within the Neighborhood Center Subdistrict that are submitted as PUDs shall provide a functional public open-space component. Such public open-space shall be developed as green space within a pedestrian-accessible 13 Words underlined are added;words stuff are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 136 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 904 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element courtyard,as per Section 4.06.03B.of the Collier County Land Development Code, as in effect at the time of P.U.D. approval. xx. The following principal permitted uses are prohibited within Neighborhood Centers: a. Drinking Places (5813) and Liquor Stores (5921) b. Mail Order Houses (5961) c. Merchandizinq Machine Operators (5962) d. Power Laundries (7211) e. Crematories (7261) (Does not include non-crematory Funeral Parlors) f. Radio, TV Representatives (7313) and Direct Mail Advertising Services 7331) g. NEC Recreational Shooting Ranges,Waterslides, etc. (7999) h. General Hospitals (8062), Psychiatric Hospitals (8063), and Specialty Hospitals (8069) i. Elementary and Secondary Schools (8211), Colleges (8221), Junior Colleges (8222) j. Libraries (8231) k. Correctional Institutions (9223) I. Waste Management(9511) m. Homeless Shelters and Soup Kitchens. xxi. The following additional restrictions and standards apply to Tract 124 and the north 150 feet of Tract 126, within the southwest quadrant of the Wilson Boulevard and Golden Gate Boulevard Center: a. Commercial uses shall be limited to the following: 1. medical offices and clinics and professional offices, except surveyors; and, 2. medical related uses, such as a wellness center. b. The ordinance rezoning this property to allow commercial uses shall include the following requirements: 1. no less than sixty percent (60%) of the gross square footage shall be designated for medical offices and clinics; and, 2. parking for the entire project shall be that required for medical office or clinic use by the Land Development Code (Ordinance No. 04-41, as amended), so as to allow 100 percent medical office use. c. Parking lot lighting shall be restricted to bollards except as may be required to comply with lighting standards in the Land Development Code Ordinance No. 04-41, as amended) and other governing regulations. d. The Neighborhood Center boundaries of this quadrant shall not be further expanded. 3. Conditional Uses Subdistrict Various types of conditional uses are permitted in the Estates zoning district within the Rural Golden Gate Estates area. In order to control the location and spacing of new conditional uses, one of the following four sets of criteria shall be met: a. Essential Services Conditional Use Provisions: Those Essential Services Conditional Uses, as identified within Section 2.01.03 G. of the Collier County Land Development Code, may be allowed anywhere within 14 Words underlined are added;words eel ough are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 137 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 905 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element the Estates Zoning District, except as prohibited in certain Neighborhood Centers, and are described as: 1. electric or gas generating plants, 2. effluent tanks, 3. major re-pump stations, 4. sewage treatment plants, including percolation ponds, 5. hospitals and hospices, 6. water aeration or treatment plants, 7. governmental facilities (except for those Permitted Uses identified in Section 2.01.03 of the Land Development Code), 8. public water supply acquisition, withdrawal, or extraction facilities, and 9. public safety service facilities, and other similar facilities. b. Neighborhood Center Transitional Conditional Use Provisions: Conditional uses shall be allowed immediately adjacent to designated Neighborhood Centers subject to the following criteria: 1. Properties eligible for conditional uses shall abut the arterial or collector road serving the Neighborhood Center, 2. Such uses shall be limited to transitional conditional uses that are compatible with both residential and commercial such as neighborhood churches, social or fraternal organizations, childcare centers, schools, and group care facilities, 3. All conditional uses shall make provisions for shared parking arrangements with adjoining developments whenever possible, 4. Conditional uses abutting Estates zoned property shall provide, at a minimum, a 75-foot buffer of native vegetation in which no parking or water management uses are permitted, 5. Conditional uses adjoining the commercial uses within Neighborhood Centers shall, whenever possible, share parking areas, access and curb cuts with the adjoining commercial use, in order to facilitate traffic movement. c. Transitional Conditional Uses: Conditional uses may be granted in Transitional Areas. A Transitional Area is defined as an area located between existing non-residential and residential areas. The purpose of this provision is to allow conditional uses in areas that are adjacent to existing non-residential uses and are therefore generally not appropriate for residential use. The conditional use will act as a buffer between non-residential and residential areas. The following criteria shall apply for Transitional Conditional Use requests: 1. Site shall be directly adjacent to a non-residential use (zoned or developed); 2. Site shall be 2.25 acres, or more, in size or be at least 150 feet in width and shall not exceed 5 acres; 3. Site abutting Estates zoned property without an approved conditional use shall provide, at a minimum, a 75-foot buffer of native vegetation in which no parking or water management uses are permitted; 4. Site shall not be adjacent to a church, neighborhood church or other place of worship, school, social or fraternal organization, child care center, convalescent home, hospice, rest home, home for the aged, adult foster home, children's home, rehabilitation centers; 5. Site shall not be adjacent to parks or open space and recreational uses; and 15 Words underlined are added;words stuff are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 138 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 906 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element 6. Site shall not be adjacent to permitted (by right) Essential Service uses, as identified in Section 2.01.03 of the Land Development Code, except may be located adjacent to libraries and museums. e. Special Exceptions to Conditional Use Locational Criteria: 1. Temporary use(TU) permits for model homes, as defined in the Collier County Land Development Code, may be allowed anywhere within the Estates-Mixed Use District. Conditional use permits for the purpose of extending the time period for use of the structure as a model home shall be required, and shall be subject to the provisions of Section 5.04.04B.and C.of the Collier County Land Development Code,Ordinance No.04-41,as amended. Such conditional uses shall not be subject to the locational criteria of the Conditional Uses Subdistrict, and may be allowed anywhere within the Estates-Mixed Use District. 2. Conditional Use permits for excavation, as provided for in the Estates zoning district, are not subject to the locational criteria for Conditional Uses and may be allowed anywhere within the Estates-Mixed Use District. 3. Conditional Use for a cellular tower is be allowed in the Estates Zoning District only on parcels no smaller than 2.25 acres and adjacent to a roadway classified within the Transportation Element as a Collector or Arterial. 4. Mission Subdistrict The Mission Subdistrict is located on the south side of Oil Well Road, approximately one-quarter mile west of Everglades Boulevard, and consists of 21.72 acres. The purpose of this Subdistrict is to provide for churches and related uses, including community outreach. The following uses are allowed: a. Churches. b. Child care centers — must be not-for-profit and affiliated with a church within the Subdistrict. c. Private schools — must be not-for-profit and affiliated with a church within the Subdistrict. d. Individual and family social services (activity centers, elderly or handicapped only; day care centers, adult and handicapped only) — must be not-for-profit and affiliated with a church within the Subdistrict. e. Medical outreach to the community, to include activities such as administering influenza vaccine, checking blood pressure, and conducting blood donation drives must be not-for-profit and affiliated with a church within the Subdistrict. f. Soup kitchens and homeless shelters are prohibited in this Subdistrict. g. The maximum total floor area allowed in this Subdistrict is 90,000 square feet. The maximum height of buildings shall be 30 feet zoned height, except the worship center shall be permitted a zoned height of 35 feet. Development in this Subdistrict shall be designed to be compatible with the existing, and allowed future, development in the surrounding area. In the alternate to the foregoing uses, measures of development intensity, and development standards, this Subdistrict may be developed with single family dwellings in accordance with the Residential Estates Subdistrict. Property adjacent to this Subdistrict shall not qualify for the Transitional Conditional Use. 16 Words underlined are added;words stuelf-t#eugh are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 139 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 907 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element 5. Everglades— Randall Subdistrict The Everglades—Randall Subdistrict is located on the northeast corner of Everglades Boulevard and Randall Boulevard, consists of 7.8 acres, and comprises Tract 115 and the east 150 feet of Tract 116, Unit 69, Golden Gate Estates. The purpose of this Subdistrict is to provide for churches and other places of worship and their related uses. The following use is permitted within the Subdistrict through the conditional use process: a. Churches and other places of worship The following church-related uses are prohibited within the Subdistrict: a. Day care centers b. Private schools c. Soup kitchens d. Homeless shelters The maximum total floor area allowed in this Subdistrict is 20,000 square feet, including no more than 230 seats. The maximum height of buildings shall be 30 feet. Architectural features such as steeples may be a maximum height of 60 feet. For access drives, a throat depth of no less than 30 feet, measured from the roadway edge of the pavement, shall be provided. B. Estates—Commercial District 1. Randall Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict The Randall Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict, containing approximately 56.5 acres, is located on the south side of Randall Boulevard and Immokalee Road (CR-846), extending from 8th Street NE west to the Corkscrew Canal. This Subdistrict is comprised of the following properties:Tracts 54, 55, 71, 72, 89, 90, 107, 108, 125, 126 and 127, Golden Gate Estates, Unit 23. This Subdistrict has been designated on the Golden Gate Area Future Land Use Map and the Randall Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict Map. It is the intent of this Subdistrict to provide commercial goods and services to the surrounding area. All development in the Subdistrict shall comply with the following requirements and limitations: a. All development is encouraged to be in the form of a PUD. b. Projects directly abutting Estates zoned property shall provide, at a minimum, a 75-foot wide buffer of retained native vegetation in which no parking or water management uses are permitted; except that, when abutting conditional uses no such buffer is required. c. Shared parking shall be required with adjoining development whenever possible. d. Tract 55 shall only be utilized for native preservation and water management areas. e. The eastern boundary of Tract 55 shall contain, at a minimum, a 50-foot wide retained native vegetation buffer. f. The following limitation shall apply to Tract 71 only: 1. Limitation of Uses— Uses shall be limited to the following: 17 Words underlined are added;words steek eugh are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 140 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 908 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element a. Automobile Service Station; b. Barber& Beauty Shops; c. Convenience Stores. d. Drug Stores; e. Food Markets; f. Hardware Stores; g. Laundries—Self Service Only; h. Parks, Public or Private; i. Post Offices and Professional Offices; j. Repair Shops—Radio,TV, Small Appliances and Shoes; k. Restaurants, including fast food restaurants but not drive in restaurants; I. All Permitted Uses of the C-2, Convenience Commercial, zoning district in the Collier County Land Development Code, Ordinance No. 04-41, as amended as of April 14. 2009; and, m. Veterinary Clinic with no outside kenneling; g. The following limitations shall apply to Tracts 72, 89, 90, 107, 108, 125, 126, 127, and Tract 54: 1. Development intensity on Tracts 72, 89, 90, 107, 108, 125, 126, 127 and the west one-half of Tract 54 shall be limited to 360,950 square feet of floor area, of which no more than 285,950 square feet shall be retail development. 2. Development intensity on the east one-half of Tract 54 shall be limited to 20,000 square feet of commercial development. 3. The first phase of the project development, exclusive of the existing 20,000 sq. ft. of development on the east one-half of Tract 54, shall include a grocery anchor,with a minimum of 35,000 square feet of gross leasable floor area, prior to any certificates of occupancy being issued beyond 100,000 square feet of commercial development. 4. Allowable uses shall be limited to the permitted and conditional uses of the C- 4, General Commercial District in the Collier County Land Development Code in effect as of the effective date of the adoption of the amendment of this Subdistrict [Ordinance No. 2010 -32, adopted July 28, 20101, except that the following uses, as identified with a number from the Standard Industrial Classification Manual, shall be prohibited: a. Tire Dealers,Automotive Retail (Group 5531) b. Automotive Parking (Group 7521) c. Communication Services (Group 4899) d. Drinking Places (Group 5813) e. Fishing Piers (Group 7999) f. Glass and Glazing work (Group 1793) g. Health Services (Groups 8059- 8069) h. Specialty Outpatient Facilities (Group 8093) i. Houseboat Rental, Lakes Operations, Party and Pleasure Boat rental Group 7999) j. Large Appliance repair service (Group 7623) k. Marinas (Group 4493 and 4499) I. Miscellaneous Repair Services (Groups 7622-7641, 7699) 18 Words underlined are added;words 9tuc gh are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 141 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 909 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element m. Liquor Store, unless operated by a Grocery Retailer(Group 5921) n. Used Merchandise Store (Group 5932) o. Automatic Merchandising Machine Operators (Group 5962) p. Direct Selling Establishment(Group 5963) q. Escort Services, Massage Parlors,Tattoo Parlors, Turkish Baths, Wedding Chapels (Group 7299) r. Betting Information Services, Bath Houses, Billiard Parlors, Bookies and Bookmakers, Cable lifts, Carnival Operation, Circus Companies, Fortune Tellers, Go-cart racing operation, Off-track betting, Ping Ponq Parlors, Rodeo Animal Rentals, Rodeos, Shooting Ranges, Trapshooting Facilities Group 7999) s. Parole offices, Probation offices, Public welfare centers, refugee services, settlement houses (Group 8322) t. Tow-in parking lots (Groups 7514, 7515, 7521) u. Animal Specialty Services (Group 0752) 5. At time of rezoning, consideration shall be given to imposing appropriate restrictions on the amount of development allowed in this Subdistrict prior to discontinuance and relocation of the Big Corkscrew Island Fire Station and Florida Division of Forestry fire tower uses. 6. All buildings on Tracts 72, 89, 90, 107, 108, 125, 126 and 127 shall be developed with a unified architectural theme. 7. Excluding the commercial zoning on Tract 71 and the existing approved commercial zoning on the east one-half of Tract 54, any additional development in the Subdistrict shall be developed in phases. Phase I shall be limited to 100,000 square feet of gross leasable floor area. Subsequent phases shall not receive building permits until the Randall Boulevard/Immokalee Road intersection proiect, including the widening of the segment of Randall Boulevard abutting the Subdistrict, as shown on Exhibit "A" of the Developer Contribution Agreement adopted July 28, 2010 by the Board of County Commissioners, has commenced. No Certificates of Occupancy shall be issued for subsequent development phases until the Randall Boulevard/Immokalee Road intersection proiect is substantially complete. Neither the building permits limitations nor the Certificates of Occupancy limitations shall apply if satisfactory alternative mitigation is approved by the Board of County Commissioners pursuant to Transportation Element Policy 5.1, or if traffic conditions change in such a manner that adequate capacity is available. 2. Estates Shopping Center Subdistrict Recognizing the need to provide for centrally located basic goods and services within a portion Northern Golden Gate Estates, the Estates Shopping Center Subdistrict has been designated on the Golden Gate Area Future Land Use Map. The Subdistrict is located at the NW corner of Golden Gate Boulevard and Wilson Boulevard westward to 3rd Street NW and extending northward to include the southern 180 feet of Tracts 142 and 106 of Unit 11 and the southern 255 feet of Tract 111 of Unit 11 of Golden Gate Estates, totaling approximately 41 acres. 19 Words underlined are added;words stuek rough are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 142 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 910 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element The Estates Shopping Center Subdistrict is intended to provide convenient shopping, personal services and employment for the central areas of Northern Golden Gate Estates. Commercial development in this Subdistrict will reduce driving distances for many residents, assist in minimizing the road network required, and reduce traffic impacts in this area of Collier County. All development in this Subdistrict shall comply with the following requirements and limitations: a. Allowable Uses, as identified with a number from the Standard Industrial Classification Manual, shall be limited to the following: 1. Amusement and recreation Groups 7911 — Dance studios, schools and halls, excluding discotheques 7991 —Physical fitness facilities 7999 —Amusement and recreation services, not elsewhere classified, allowing only day camps, gymnastics instruction, ludo/karate instruction, sporting goods rental and yoga instruction 2. Apparel and accessory stores (no adult oriented sales) Groups 5611 — Men's and boys' clothing and accessory stores 5621 —Women's clothing stores 5632—Women's accessory and specialty stores 5641 —Children's and infants'wear stores 5651 —Family clothing stores 5661 —Shoe stores 5699— Miscellaneous apparel and accessory stores 3. Automotive dealers and gasoline service stations Groups 5531 —Auto and home supply stores 4. Automotive repair, services and parking (No outdoor repair/service. All repairs/services to be performed by authorized automotive technician.) Groups 7514— Passenger car rental 5. Building materials, hardware, garden supply, and mobile home dealers Groups 5231 — Paint, glass, and wallpaper stores 5251 — Hardware stores 5261 — Retail nurseries, lawn and garden supply stores 6. Business services Groups 7334— Photocopying and duplicating services 7335—Commercial photography 7336—Commercial art and graphic design 7338—Secretarial and court reporting services 7342—Disinfecting and pest control services 7352— Medical equipment rental and leasing 7359—Equipment rental and leasing, not elsewhere classified, excluding the following uses: airplane rental and leasing; coin operated machine rental and leasing; industrial truck rental and leasing; oil field equipment rental and leasing; oil well drilling equipment rental; leasing; toilets, portable—rental and leasing., and vending machines—rental only 20 Words underlined are added;words stuelc eugh are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 143 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 911 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element 7371 —Computer programming services 7372— Prepackaged software 7373—Computer integrated systems design 7374—Computer processing and data preparation and processing services 7375— Information retrieval services 7376—Computer facilities management services 7379—Computer related services, not elsewhere classified 7382—Security systems services 7383— News syndicates 7384— Photofinishing laboratories 7389— Business services, not elsewhere classified 7. Communications Groups 4812— Radiotelephone communications 4841 —Cable and other pay television services 8. Construction, special trade contractors (office use only, no on-site materials or equipment storage) Groups 1711 — Plumbing, heating and air-conditioning 1721 — Painting and paper hanging industry 1731 — Electrical work industry 1741 — Masonry, stone setting, and other stone work 1742— Plastering, drywall, acoustical, and insulation work 1743—Terrazzo, tile, marble, and mosaic work industry 1751 —Carpentry work 1752— Floor laying and other floor work, not elsewhere classified industry 1761 — Roofing, siding, and sheet metal work industry 1771 —Concrete work industry 1781 —Water well drilling industry 1791 —Structural steel erection 1793—Glass and glazing work 1794— Excavation work 1795—Wrecking and demolition work 1796— Installation or erection of building equipment, not elsewhere 1799—Special trade contractors, not elsewhere classified 9. Depository institutions Groups 6021 — National commercial banks 6022—State commercial banks 6029—Commercial banks, not elsewhere classified 6035—Savings institutions, federally chartered 6036—Savings Institutions, not federally chartered 6061 —Credit unions, federally chartered 6062—Credit unions, not federally chartered 6091 —Non-deposit trust facilities 21 Words underlined are added;words stuff are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 144 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 912 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element 6099—Functions related to depository banking, not elsewhere classified 10. Eating and drinking places (Group 5812, including only liquor service accessory to the restaurant use, no outdoor music or televisions, and no windows or walls open to the outside, except as required by code) 11. Engineering, accounting, research, management, and related services Groups 8711 — Engineering services 8712—Architectural services 8713—Surveying services 8721 —Accounting, auditing, and bookkeeping services 8741 — Management services 8742— Management consulting services 8743— Public relations services 8748— Business consulting services, not elsewhere classified 12. Executive, legislative, and general government, except finance Groups 9111 —Executive offices 9121 — Legislative bodies 9131 — Executive and legislative offices combined 9199—General government, not elsewhere classified 13. Food stores Groups 5411 —Grocery stores (minimum 27,000 square feet) 5421 —Meat and fish (seafood) markets, including freezer provisioners 5431 — Fruit and vegetable markets 5441 —Candy, nut, and confectionery stores 5451 — Dairy products stores 5461 — Retail bakeries 5499—Miscellaneous food stores, including convenience stores with fuel pumps and carwash 14. General merchandise stores Groups 5311 —Department stores 5331 —Variety stores 5399— Miscellaneous general merchandise stores 15. Home furniture, furnishings, and equipment stores Groups 5712— Furniture stores 5713— Floor covering stores 5714—Drapery, curtain, and upholstery stores 5719—Miscellaneous home furnishings stores 5722— Household appliance stores 5731 — Radio, television, and consumer electronics stores 5734—Computer and computer software stores 5735— Record and prerecorded tape stores (no adult oriented sales) 5736— Musical instrument store 22 Words underlined are added;words 9tuc are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 145 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 913 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element 16. Insurance carriers Groups 6311 — Life insurance 6321 —Accident and health insurance 6324— Hospital and medical service plans 6331 — Fire, marine, and casualty insurance 6351 —Surety insurance 6361 —Title insurance 6371 — Pension, health and welfare funds 6399— Insurance carriers, not elsewhere classified 6411 — Insurance agents 17. Justice, public order and safety Groups 9221 —Police protection 9222— Legal counsel and prosecution 9229— Public order and safety, not elsewhere classified 18. Meeting and banquet rooms 19. Miscellaneous retail (no adult oriented sales) Groups 5912— Drug stores and proprietary stores 5921 — Liquor stores (accessory to grocery or pharmacy only) 5932— Used merchandise stores 5941 —Sporting goods stores and bicycle shops 5942—Book stores 5943—Stationery stores 5944—Jewelry stores, including repair 5945— Hobby, toy, and game shops 5946—Camera and photographic supply stores 5947—Gift, novelty, and souvenir shops 5948— Luggage and leather goods stores 5949—Sewing, needlework, and piece goods stores 5992— Florists 5993—Tobacco stores and stands 5994—News dealers and newsstands 5995—Optical goods stores 5999—Miscellaneous retail stores, not elsewhere classified (excluding gravestone, tombstones, auction rooms, monuments, swimming pools, and sales barns) 20. Non-depository credit institutions Groups 6111 —Federal and federally-sponsored credit agencies 6141 — Personal credit institutions 6153—Short-term business credit institutions, except agricultural 6159— Miscellaneous business credit institutions 6162— Mortgage bankers and loan correspondents 6163— Loan brokers 21. Offices and clinics of dentist(Group 8021) 23 Words underlined are added;words steel eugh are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 146 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 914 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element 22. Personal services Groups 7212—Garment pressing, and agents for laundries and drycleaners 7221 — Photographic studios, portrait 7231 — Beauty shops 7241 — Barber shops 7251 —Shoe repair shops and shoeshine parlors 7291 —Tax return preparation services 7299—Miscellaneous personal services, not elsewhere classified, excluding massage parlors, Turkish baths and escort services 23. Public finance, taxation, and monetary policy (Group 9311) 24. Real Estate Groups 6512—Operators of nonresidential buildings 6513—Operators of apartment buildings 6514—Operators of dwellings other than apartment buildings 6515—Operators of residential mobile home sites 6517— Lessors of railroad property 6519—Lessors of real property, not elsewhere classified 6531 — Real estate agents and managers 6541 —Title abstract offices 6552— Land subdividers and developers, except cemeteries 25. Schools and educational services, not elsewhere classified (Group 8299) 26. Security and commodity brokers, dealers, exchanges, and services Groups 6211 —Security brokers, dealers, and flotation companies 6221 —Commodity contracts brokers and dealers 6231 —Security and commodity exchanges 6282— Investment advice 6289—Services allied with the exchange of securities or commodities, not elsewhere classified 27. Social services Groups 8322— Individual and family social services (adult day care centers only) 8351 —Child day care services 28. Travel agencies (Group 4724) 29.Veterinary services for animal specialties (Group 0742, excluding outside kenneling) 30. Video tape rental (Group 7841, excluding adult oriented sales and rentals) 31. United states postal service (Group 4311, excluding major distribution centers) 32.Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals BZA") by the process outlined in the LDC. b. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including, but not limited to: 24 Words underlined are added;words stuelethfettgh are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 147 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 915 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element 1. Utility buildings (including water and wastewater plants) which shall be enclosed 2. Essential service facilities 3. Gazebos, statuary and other architectural features 4. Utilities, water and wastewater facilities and/or plants (all processing plants must be enclosed) 5. Alcohol service for outdoor dining shall only be accessory to food service c. Operational Standards 1. Outdoor music is prohibited d. The following uses, as identified with a number from the Standard Industrial Classification Manual, shall be prohibited: 1. Amusement and recreation services, not elsewhere classified (Group 7999, except those uses expressly listed above in a.1 are permitted) 2. Air and water resource and solid waste management(Group 9511) 3. Business Services Groups 7313 — Radio, television, and publishers' advertising representatives 7331 — Direct mail advertising services 4. Correctional Institutions (Group 9223) 5. Drinking places (alcoholic beverages) (Group 5813) 6. Educational services Groups 8211 — Elementary and secondary schools 8221 —Colleges, universities, and professional schools 8222—Junior colleges and technical institutes 8231 — Libraries 7. Health services Groups 8062—General medical and surgical hospitals 8063— Psychiatric hospitals 8069—Specialty hospitals, except psychiatric 8. Miscellaneous Retail Groups 5921 — Liquor stores 5961 —Catalog and mail-order houses 5962—Automatic merchandising machine operators 9. Personal services Groups 7211 — Power Laundries, family and commercial 7261 — Funeral service and crematories 10. Social services Groups 8322 — Individual and family social services, excluding adult day care centers 8361 — Residential care, including soup kitchens and homeless shelters e. Development intensity shall be limited to 190,000 square feet of gross leasable floor area. f. No commercial use shall exceed fifteen thousand (15,000) square feet, except for a single grocery store use between twenty-seven thousand (27,000) and sixty 25 Words underlined are added;words 4aelethfeugh are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 148 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 916 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element thousand (60,000) square feet in size, a single commercial use of up to thirty thousand (30,000)square feet in size, and a single commercial use of up to twenty thousand (20,000) square feet in size. g. No building may exceed 30,000 square feet in size, except for the grocery anchored building with inline stores. h. Development within this Subdistrict shall be phased and the following commitments related to area roadway improvements shall be completed within the specified timeframes: 1. Right-of-Way for Golden Gate Boulevard Expansion and Right-of-Way for the Wilson Boulevard Expansion will be donated to the County at no cost within 120 days of a written request from the County. 2. The owner will pay its fair share for the intersection improvements at Wilson Boulevard and Golden Gate Boulevard within 90 days of County request for reimbursement. 3. Until the intersection improvements at Golden Gate Boulevard and Wilson Boulevard are complete, the County shall not issue a Certificate(s) of Occupancy (CO) for more than 100,000 square feet of development. The applicant must obtain a C.O. for a grocery store as part of this 100,000 square feet, and the grocery store must be the first C.O. obtained. i. Rezoning is encouraged to be in the form of a Planned Unit Development (PUD), and the rezone ordinance must contain development standards to ensure that all commercial land uses will be compatible with neighboring residential uses. This subdistrict includes a conceptual plan, which identifies the location of the permitted development area and required preserve area for this subdistrict. The preserve area depicted on the conceptual plan shall satisfy all comprehensive plan requirements for retained native vegetation, including but not limited to the requirements of Policy 6.1.1 of the CCME. A more detailed development plan must be developed and utilized for the required PUD rezoning. Development standards, including permitted uses and setbacks for principal buildings shall be established at the time of PUD rezoning. Any future PUD rezone shall include at a minimum: 1. Landscape buffers adjacent to external rights-of-way shall be: a. 1St/3rd Streets—Minimum 30'wide enhanced buffer b. Wilson Boulevard—Minimum 25'wide enhanced buffer c. Golden Gate Boulevard —Minimum 50'wide enhanced buffer 2. Except for the utility building, no commercial building may be constructed within 125 feet of the northern property boundary and within 300' of the 3rd Street NW boundary of this subdistrict. 3. Any portion of the Project directly abutting residential property (property zoned E-Estates and without an approved conditional use) shall provide, at a minimum, a seventy-five (75)feet wide buffer, except the westernmost 330'of Tract 106, which shall provide a minimum 20'wide buffer in which no parking uses are permitted. Twenty-five (25)feet of the width of the buffer along the developed area shall be a landscape buffer. A minimum of fifty (50)feet of 26 Words underlined are added;words atue' gh are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 149 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 917 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element the buffer width shall consist of retained or re-planted native vegetation and must be consistent with subsection 3.05.07.H of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC). The native vegetation retention area may consist of a perimeter berm and be used for water management detention. Any newly constructed berm shall be revegetated to meet subsection 3.05.07.H of the LDC (native vegetation replanting requirements). Additionally, in order to be considered for approval, use of the native vegetation retention area for water management purposes shall meet the following criteria: a. There shall be no adverse impacts to the native vegetation being retained. The additional water directed to this area shall not increase the annual hydro-period unless it is proven that such would have no adverse impact to the existing vegetation. b. If the project requires permitting by the South Florida Water Management District, the project shall provide a letter or official document from the District indicating that the native vegetation within the retention area will not have to be removed to comply with water management requirements. If the District cannot or will not supply such a letter,then the native vegetation retention area shall not be used for water management. c. If the project is reviewed by Collier County, the developer's engineer shall provide evidence that no removal of native vegetation is necessary to facilitate the necessary storage of water in the water management area. 2. AGRICULTURAL/RURAL DESIGNATION A. Rural Settlement Area District This area consists of Sections 13, 14, 23 and 24, and a portion of 22, Township 48 South, Range 27 East(the former North Golden Gate Subdivision), which was zoned and platted between 1967 and 1970. In settlement of a lawsuit pertaining to the permitted uses of this property, this property has been "vested" for the types of land uses specified in that certain "PUD" by Settlement Zoning granted by the County as referenced in that certain SETTLEMENT AND ZONING AGREEMENT dated the 27th day of January 1986. Twenty-one hundred (2,100)dwelling units and twenty-two (22) acres of neighborhood commercial uses and hotel/motel use are "vested". This area is now comprised of the Orange Tree PUD and Orange Blossom Ranch PUD, and the types of uses permitted in this District include residential, earth mining, commercial, agricultural,community facility,community uses,education facilities, religious facilities, golf course, open space and recreational uses, and essential service uses. By designation in the Growth Management Plan and the Golden Gate Area Master Plan as Settlement Area, the Plan recognizes the property as an area which, while outside of the Urban Designation, is appropriate for the following types of uses: residential,earth mining,commercial,agricultural,community facility,community uses, education facilities, religious facilities, golf course, open space and recreational, and essential services. Future zoning changes to add dwelling units or commercial acreage within the geographic boundaries of this District will not be prohibited or discouraged by reason of the above-referenced vested status. The geographic expansion of the Settlement Area to additional lands outside the areas covered by Sections 13, 14, 23 and 24, and a portion of 22, Township 48 South, Range 27 East (the former North Golden Gate 27 Words underlined are added;words stuelc eugh are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 150 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 918 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element Subdivision), shall be prohibited. The Settlement Area Land Use District is limited to the area described above and shall not be available as a land use district for any other property in the County. 3. OVERLAYS AND SPECIAL FEATURES A. Southern Golden Gate Estates Natural Resource Protection Overlay Southern Golden Gate Estates is identified as a Natural Resource Protection Area NRPA) Overlay on the Golden Gate Area Future Land Use Map and is subiect to the NRPA Overlay provisions of the FLUE. JREMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK' 28 Words underlined are added;words stuck through are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 151 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 919 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element C. List of Maps Golden Gate Area Future Land Use Map Golden Gate Estates Neighborhood Centers Wilson Boulevard/Golden Gate Boulevard Center Golden Gate Boulevard/Everglades Boulevard Center Immokalee Road/Everglades Boulevard Center Randall Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict Mission Subdistrict Estates Shopping Center Subdistrict Estates Shopping Center Subdistrict Conceptual Plan Everglades— Randall Subdistrict Immokalee Road/Randall Boulevard Planning Study Area 29 Words underlined are added;words stuelk-through are deleted. 03/08/2019 Page 152 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 920 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) nun... URBAN DESIGNATION ESTATES DESIGNATION AGRICULTURAL/RURAL DESIGNATION MIXED USE DISTRICT MIXED USE DISTRICT Mg Rat.Salome.araa Mtn. Udasn Remdaraal Sabdtalda =Resdlenbal Estates S. . HO°Kty Residential Sub..Conditional Uses SWAM. OVERLAYS AND SPECIAL FEATURES 10......ener Commern215.221120.2 Spacial Raceptror.to Candid*Use OM.. EM Southern Gold.Gan DAN.Mai GOLDEN GATE AREA El=data.Suladm0. ED Nepal*Canter S.M. 0 Ras*Dern Bands 0) FUTURE LAND USE MAP m Won Suadadant NESanta Barbara Crtanmednail SuadsInd CO MI. mSub<Micl N. =corer Eowevard commenNai Sveamnd IMMOKALEE RD I a- COMMERCIAL DISTRICT MN '''''Acnerr"'Tat a3- Bement al be GRP) Rao Rdlga Rood ha/Use Suadasinci 11111 Randall Balla Convnarcial Suladaddd I Commercial Wastam Estates hal Suladisirld M Wall Suadiatfir''e'''''''' Eakdaa Shopp,Can...MYR I Boa*.Office Subdialect NOTE: I loRameR Cm 1.101 BE IRRRPREIRD window-NE CORR aiRECTIvES mac..ano Lap.usa DEsiRmine4 odscalanOM secy.,-ma 60Loan. 2 Ill Ii I OIL WELL RD 71 I Co ES al a. BLVD I-- IMMOKALEE RD 1 a I 1'SUBJECT SITE(ADDITIONS) 0 CPSP-2018-2 VAND:RBILT: ... R. m- GOLDEN NATE Nyla rum, GOLDEN GIVE BLVD iii L as 6+ GFIFF00,0 1r- i I 1 0, o) ILI d 1- I111111 1 i g If . RADIM Cy INTERSTATE 75 INTERSTATE 75 l 7 DAVIS BLVDir i RATTLES*AKE H• MOCK RD LIT I— ror, 2: GOLDEN GATE FUTURE LAND USE MAP IIIAMENDED-DECEMBER 4,2007 r:: ADOPTED.FEBRARY,1991 (ORD.NO.2007-77) AMENDED-MAY 19,1992 AMENDED-OCTOBER 14.2008 ORD.NO 2008-59) AMENDED-MAY 25,1993 AMENDED-JULY 29,2010 AMENDED-JULY 27,1993 (ORD.NO.2010-31) AMENDED-JULY 28.2010 AMENDED•APRIL 12,1994 ORD.NO 2010.32 9 AMENDED-MARCH 14,1995 MENDEA- DSZTE: 611n14,2011 It AMENDED-OCTOBER 27.1997 AMENDED-NOVEMBER 18.2014 F.6 AMENDED-APRIL 14.1998 ( ORD.NO.2014-41) 7( AMENDED-NOVEMBER 10.2015 0 e, AMENDED-SEPTEMBER 8,1998 .( EONRDIDNOi. 2.0y115- 0622)016 4 0 ORD.NO.2016-12 f'4 L73 AMENDED-FEBRUARY 23,1999 AMENDED-JUNE 13,2017 I— AMENDED-MAY 9.2000 ORD NO.2017-23 AMENDED-MARCH 13,2001 AMENDED-XXXXX 4 4E) AMENDED-MAY 14.2002 AMENDED•SEPTEMBER 10.2003 ( ORD NO XXXX) 4 ORD NO.2003-441 AMENDED•OCTOBER 26.2004 Miles AMENDED-JANUARY 25 2005 ORD.NO 2005-3) manza==aynAsacial.AMENDED-JANUARY 25.2007 A ORD NO.2007-19) I R 26 E i R 27 E I R 28 E I R 29 E 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 921 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 GOLDEN GATE ESTATES NEIGHBORHOOD CENTERS Collier County, Florida IMMOKALEE ROAD 1 OIL WELL ROAD IMMOKALEE ROAD 0 Jm n J LJ.I m 0 Q Z J 0 CD Ln O_ J W Urban Golden GOLDEN GATE BOULEVARD f m Gate ~ m• Rural Golden Gate II Estates Estates WHITE BLVD. 0 Jm a_ W JJ 0 0 INTERSTATE — 75 AMENDED — SEPTEMBER 10, 2003 Ord. No. 2003-44) AMENDED — OCTOBER 26, 2004 Ord. No. 2004-71) AMENDED — JANUARY 25, 2007 GOLDEN GATE ESTATES Ord. No. 2007-19) NEIGHBORHOOD CENTERS AMENDED — OCTOBER 14, 2008 LEGEND 0 1 MI 2 MI Ord. No. 2008-59) PREPARED BY: GIS/CAD MAPPING SECTION NEIGHBORHOOD COMMApI1D PMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION AMENDED — SEPTEMBER 14, 2011 CENTERS FILE: O8-2.DWG DATE: 9/2011 Ord. No. 2011-29)Pada 1S4 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 922 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) NO chEargliWtiadirialkmendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 WILSON BOULEVARD/GOLDEN GATE BOULEVARD CENTER Collier County, Florida z IMMOKALEE ' •- D O O a r j A t4 A :11 'V ' t ADOPTED — SEPTEMBER 10, 2003 o.03-44 AMENDED d— NOJANUARY 25) 2007 LEGEND Ord. No. 2007-19) AMENDED — DECEMBER 4, 2007 Ord. No. 2007-76) GOLDEN GATE SETTLEMENT AMENDED — OCTOBER 14, 2008 ESTATES AREA Ord. No. 2008-59) AMENDED — SEPTEMBER 14, 2011 Ord. No. 2011-29) NEIGHBORHOOD 0 1/2 MI. 1 MI. CENTER PREPARED BY: GIS/CAD MAPPING SECTION COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION FILE: GGQ9/M20688-5.DWG DATE: 9/2011 rage 155 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 923 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 No changes to map. GOLDEN GATE BOULEVARD/EVERGLADES BOULEVARD CENTER Collier County, Florida V / / / / j j c IMMOKALEE '0 D 0 a 0 o Y Go a rA' :• •V' 0 7//x A ADOPTED — SEPTEMBER 10, 2003 LEGEND Ord. No. 2003-44) NDED — JANUAR5, 2007 Or . No. 9) GOLDEN GATE SETTLEMENT 4, 2008 9) NEIGHBORHOOD 0 1/2 MI. 1 Ml. CENTER PREPARED BY: GRAPHICS AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT SECTION COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION FILE: GGMP-45-2008-1.DWG DATE: 10/2008 03/08/2019 Page 156 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 924 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 No changes to map. IMMOKALEE ROAD/EVERGLADES BOULEVARD CENTER Collier County, Florida IMMOKALEE ROAD 1/ z IMMOKALEE 11. X AMENDED — SEPTEMBER 10, 2003 Ord. No. 2003-44) LEGEND AMENDED — OCTOBER 26, 2004 Ord. No. 2004-71) AMENDED — JANUARY 25, 2007 Ord. No. 2007-19) AMENDED — OCTOBER 14, 2008 GOLDEN GATE SETTLEMENT Ord. No. 2008-59) ESTATES AREA NEIGHBORHOOD 0 1/2 MI. 1 MI. CENTER PREPARED BY: GRAPHICS AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT SECTION COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION FILE: GGMP-44-2008-1.DWG DATE: 10/2008 03/08/2019 Page 157 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 925 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 2010o0oo2c1/crsrt2o10 2 No changes to map. RANDALL BOULEVARD COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT Collier County, Florida I E. •• , IMMOKALEE `O" R" c Z U. r a i• • : 1 - • 0 a 0 t0 I • 0 A: ' LEGEND AMENDED — SEPTEMBER 10, 2003 Ord. No. 2003-44) AMENDED — JANUARY 25, 2007 Ord. No. 2007-19) AMENDED JULY 28, 2010 GOLDEN GATE SETTLEMENT Ord. No. 2010-32) ESTATES AREA 0 1/2 MI. 1 MI. PREPARED BY: GIS/CAD MAPPING SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION / PLANNING & REGULATION FILE: CP-2008-2C.DWG DATE: 7/2010 03/08/2019 Paye 158 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 926 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) on-0 znomn r1O 7 nNKOPaOZm{ DOno0mOC.e CD •Q m Cl),Z.) V'm p FnODOcoN2-O Z-2o WILSON BOULEVARD O ooznN)O2-- N) CP omNR.? J iiii......_AmOC riD O IMMOKALEE ROAD C.R.846 N) N) N C) f 0) CC CO 0 - 0 f C- o r 7 ct • C- Z p O o o z/,, O n V O n Z 1yc m 0 C I- CO 1--1 .11 OC CO t' '9 o v 00 J IP EVERGLADES BOULEVARD OO O-P1am N) z 1 N N J COa0 N C O-< 0 N W Po NO_ O N N c0 0) WI Cri O A CO o ymV 1.D n J - 0 9.A.3.kPacket Pg. 927Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) NO Chap> esptgeprlal,Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 ESTATES SHOPPING CENTER SUBDISTRICT Collier County, Florida V / / / /./ IMMOKALEE D A , 0 v.„a, P eA ' V • e ADOPTED — SEPTEMBER 14, 2011 Ord. No. 2011-29) LEGEND GOLDEN GATE SETTLEMENT ESTATES AREA I I I ESTATES SHOPPING 0 1/2 MI. 1 MI. CENTER SUBDISTRICT PREPARED BY: GIS/CAD MAPPING SECTION COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION FILE: GGQ3/0812Q063-6.DWG DATE: 9/2009 ragc 1 G0 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 928 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) o ONmtn0THIRDSTREETNWC7zntoa)f s sin zD rDom m1 or mn Q Z,1 BOm r Al a M r0 co NmNZl p Z 2z>0 z N)0 ZC13 r. o;O m A O n n N O z g0 mtjmpm C zg s — 4 0o r E& f O m C)m P mMC s m o w. t 120-8 z 1' 1 czi I' 4s zzZ O a.. 0 J WILSON BOULEVARD 1m S s s z 9.A.3.kPacket Pg. 929Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) o, 2770077102S72; IWILSONBOULEVARD470.k ) G GN) 3 CD cn IMMOKALEE ROAD C.R.846 Q 1 0 0 N.) rtr m k m S G ta k 0 q OE 0 q 4. E Zo 71Z 0 c< \ 71 02mcri o op 0 w 0 c 2dD 4A„i_____ J g 4 EVERGLADESBOULEVARD 3 rn00 CO CO fm o N) 2 om rq r I j 9.A.3.kPacket Pg. 930Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) 114161°6"oV a r d r ALJ Rf'IV Ua jvI t PlatL T I'' IIS I N G ' h i lt8A Ocean Bluff CT . 01134:41.`til zt LEGEND ilititfit. 'tillit ` NWS Ir IMMOKALEE RD/RANDALL BLVD PLANNING STUDY AREA t j RESHI IDENTIAL ESTATES SUBDISTRICT N Mil RAN IJ BLVD COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT RURAL SETTLEMENT AREA SUBDISTRICT 0 500 ,000 2,000 3,000 i A a Feet i OIL•-WELL RD .. PREPARED BY:BETH YANG,AICP g # GREPAR MMIAGE H YA DEPARTMENT FILE:qnm RanealsWey Area.mxe y3 DATE:OI/2019 I 0 . LU r£ A Ci J Z an-1 J ti-::::'::= t' ol*- 6:; Z Z y J N N F- 4 Randall Blvd Commercial SubdistrictI 4zE*4414 CO 0 25th AVE NE g IMMOKALEE i ;. RANDALL BLVD 0 II F58 24th AVE NE Z O J_ ADOPTED-XXXXX,2019 Ord. 5. 03/08/2019 No.XXXX-XX) Page 163 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 931 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 Conservation and Coastal Management Element Adopted October 1997, amended through December 12, 2017 by Ordinance no. 2017-48) GOAL 6: pg. 16] TO IDENTIFY, PROTECT, CONSERVE AND APPROPRIATELY USE NATIVE VEGETATIVE COMMUNITIES AND WILDLIFE HABITAT. OBJECTIVE 6.1 pg. 16] Protect native vegetative communities through the application of minimum preservation requirements. (The Policies under this Objective apply to all of Collier County except for that portion of the County which is identified on the Countywide Future Land Use Map (FLUM) as the Rural Lands Stewardship Area Overlay.) Policy 6.1.1 pg. 16] For the County's Urban Designated Area, Estates Designated Area, Conservation Designated Area, and Agricultural/Rural Mixed Use District, Rural-Industrial District and Rural-Settlement Area District as designated on the FLUM, native vegetation shall be preserved through the application of the following minimum preservation and vegetation retention standards and criteria, unless the development occurs within the Area of Critical State Concern (ACSC)where the ACSC standards referenced in the Future Land Use Element shall apply. Notwithstanding the ACSC requirements, this Policy shall apply to all non-agricultural development except for single-family dwelling units situated on individual parcels that are not located within a watershed management conservation area identified in a Watershed Management Plan developed pursuant to Policies supporting Objective 2.1 of this Element. For property in Golden Gate Estates and designated Residential Estates in the Golden Gate Area Master Plan, the subdivision of parcels up to 13 acres in size into single family lots shall be treated as single family dwelling units under the preceding sentence. For properties not previously within the Coastal High Hazard Area but now within the Coastal High Hazard Area due to adoption of a revised Coastal High Hazard Area boundary in 2013, the native vegetation preservation and retention standards of the Non-Coastal High Hazard Area shall continue to apply. (Reference the Coastal High Hazard Area Comparison Map in the Future Land Use Element.) Words underlined are added;words struck through are deleted. Row of asterisks(**** **** ****)denotes break in text. 03/08/2019 Page 164 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 932 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 Future Land Use Element Adopted October 1997, amended through December 12, 2017 by Ordinance no. 2017-48) FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION DESCRIPTION SECTION pg. 25] URBAN DESIGNATION pg. 25] C. Urban Commercial District pg. 54] 1. Mixed Use Activity Center Subdistrict pg. 54] Allowable land uses in Mixed Use Activity Centers include the full array of commercial [pg. 55] uses, residential uses, institutional uses, hotel/motel uses at a maximum density of 26 units per acre, community facilities, and other land uses as generally allowed in the Urban designation. Mixed Use Activity Center#15, in Golden Gate City, shall also allow the additional uses identified in the Golden Gate Area Master Plan. The actual mix of the various land uses shall be determined during the rezoning process based on consideration of the factors listed below. Except as restricted below under the provision for Master Planned Activity Centers, all Mixed Use Activity Centers may be developed with any of the land uses allowed within this Subdistrict. Words underlined are added;words struck `hrough are deleted. Row of asterisks(**** **** ****)denotes break in text. 03/08/2019 Page 165 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 933 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan-BCC Transmittal Draft 20160000261/CPSP-2018-2x1No1 ' UccWcENn _ 6j a ti a o w o r' z , p o -4 =u N d N W O a rcsZgi' 8 5QOi3I4zz ,_ rLL oQOp000Rpj x oFZ ,, w0 w 50 O ' WvaILLnuO E'_"LZ1Q0gr 'O p Emmy isi 7 7 § 0 It_,,i; .! , Am ilia gm um vim IIII ri 1111111,0111. L; AIIIIIIMs1111 1111 LI.-©--- lita PVI 0 g oo A . 0 vow II! 0 ea ova Iii 0 ..e .,0„,.,,..f. mksr__,._ ilk, esw,- -0 110 , va w, ...masaill11111 wa va,oo 1 0 w .***- ons0400,* ,,a• p. _, osw Ars liall agnAdivo9-dllitl tik 10v* 0 a- _--, ems. th t,j to 70w7--Ai7MF_12 sAwa 4- 44% ow wow s. 4 . . / 44 0 3 R. 11. J s 41 Ai RP =II 1 44,4 00 I 01 MS 30Vtle31 OS 7: me ig.c''.. • 4 \ E;jJII t4 0 4/4 : 3 ' mil% ,„w4 ‘'0 4, MI Ira i II• El milm — .4','-.. — Inalirtit4 4%.4.40 lip old 03/08/2019 Page 166 of 1709.A.3.kPacket Pg. 934Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Q Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan-BCC Transmittal Draft 201800001/CPSP-2018-2ughhUWZUDNMw -N 0 O <'2„-Z w N 4Za0wNNmZ - 7 8 LiP=4 m ao 2•- W'- Z w O°Oaw iQ Z0NwN 'N W^ N- Z aIU02 J v 4aUV5,2 fu'-2 'Z V IL;O0,, ,F W m aseF < o aop > Wv Jr wao c38wOpOpOrcNyzOo_ eYpWWmigSwXH >I 5LuZpWQo9QzDw zjg_ = & iMIa¢r1rcawwzw..sN86OC7NITANEUeiiii @- :: mu ,F;ii ia--qua Li2,..Fingue mak gaw: 42061 gia Ir In ® . Ell z t G 0z° rJ ®Ile®- a 0ar ® ct i,0"\1.44p 0 0 0 4414 ttlaW! lei* '.. s. III 0‘100 laSSIlw o q® o AO o 0 0 0 Q 1012 01 i o o tW o 9 iv iro.Alik # . All., _. ,i016 Gilil ' ' N4 . 4" .47# ttV ' '''''' °Ell8\ 8"I t*.:11,4 , 2 5 % Volk ,,,,,,,,74441k.;.. se/1& @. s.111164110 ' ® G 0 LL 0 0" 0 ik, :8 P a® e• . ® k.,..t, 8 O• x0' ' 0 o _ g°0 Q, Ir# 40 16t 4 e tt 0• x Q >r Ilaii4ka NLL 1ik,Q O 0g amaim 1 S vIct& oj oe' :: wwiL 9- - 0 cil ri 1 1 0ii1 4M5133a15HASEN11 s a til Vo"4e1 ' 10 4*TP, 4„ 45” 0. 0 CNO0GOI0J0000' ''. M'S30..1N1R 3 7 III 1 dah, V .,,,,04 44 V Y iV k B y 5133a1515 LS 4 ' o 0 0 ® 0 Q ® ® ° xqq; jj ;o co00 0- = © Q ° Ac tISA;: i4±VI 0. , °I 4oQo0e0enoRo °T 41pa3ionn LLSi, 0 0 ® 0'-3 ® ® © ® el p 0 0 ill0000c. ® MU 0 aNR u. s. g. 0 3 0 IMF0 ® Iq® si ®q `® 16 5 ~,., QF.®" x 0 ° - 1). 11rito Arirr x Qii;!E;J::±Q0 "I e elitriatre.414,4,4® n 8-II . l' 0 q® ttbla8o®" 0 N .e MI 11 =0A vAbri6. Iriomi&t..'9.A.3.kPacket Pg. 935Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT Solid Waste Disposal Sub-Element Adopted October 1997, amended through December 12, 2017 by Ordinance no. 2017-48) GOAL: pg. 2] TO PROVIDE AN EFFICIENT AND ECONOMICAL BALANCE OF PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SERVICES THAT WILL ENABLE THE PEOPLE OF COLLIER COUNTY TO MEET THE ESTABLISHED REQUIREMENTS FOR SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL AND MANAGEMENT IN A MANNER THAT ASSURES PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY AND PROTECTS THE ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES OF COLLIER COUNTY. OBJECTIVE 2: (DISPOSAL) pg. 16] Utilize safe and efficient methods for environmentally sound disposal of solid waste in accordance with local, State and Federal regulations and investigate improved methods and implement practices that meet this Objective. Policy 2.15: pg. 16] The County shall continue to pursue a best management practices approach to making septage treatment available to residents and businesses within Golden Gate Estates, as a component of bio-solid processing, either directly, through a private entity, or through a public private partnership. Words underlined are added;words struck `hrough are deleted. Row of asterisks(**** **** ****)denotes break in text. 03/08/2019 Page 168 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 936 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT Stormwater Management Sub-Element Adopted October 1997, amended through December 12, 2017 by Ordinance no. 2017-48) GOAL: pg. 2] TO PROVIDE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FACILITIES AND SERVICES FOR DRAINAGE AND FLOOD PROTECTION FOR EXISTING AND FUTURE DEVELOPMENT, MINIMIZE THE DEGRADATION OF QUALITY OF RECEIVING WATERS AND SURROUNDING NATURAL AREAS AND PROTECT THE FUNCTIONS OF NATURAL GROUNDWATER AQUIFER RECHARGE AREAS. OBJECTIVE 2: pg. 3] Maintain adopted drainage level of service standards for basins and sub-basins identified in the Water Management Master Plan. Maintenance of the drainage level of service (LOS) identified for each basin will be implemented through the watershed management planning process identified within Goal 2 of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element of this Growth Management Plan. Policy 2.3: pg. 3] The County will periodically coordinate with the South Florida Water Management District to review the Level of Service Standards for primary water management canals within the County and their effect on Golden Gate Estates. OBJECTIVE 5: pg.4] Regulate land use and development in a manner that protects the functions of natural drainage features, the stormwater management network and natural groundwater aquifer recharge areas. Implementation of this Objective will be consistent with the Watershed Management Planning process identified within Goal 2 of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element of the Growth Management Plan, and with relevant provisions contained within the adopted Land Development Code (Ordinance Number 2004-41, as amended). Policy 5.3 pg. 4] The County will continue to identify and implement educational opportunities related to water resources for parcel owners, homeowners, builders, real estate professionals and the public to aid in understanding and addressing site-specific financial and environmental impacts as well as area-wide impacts to water resources. Policy 5.4 pg. 4] Within two years of adoption, the County will initiate a study on the feasibility of dispersed water management (DWM) for Golden Gate Estates, and determine the extent to which it will rely on voluntary, incentive or mandatory provisions and whether provisions will apply to developed and undeveloped parcels in Golden Gate Estates. Words underlined are added;words ick through are deleted. Row of asterisks(**** **** ****)denotes break in text. 03/08/2019 Page 169 of 170 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 937 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Staff Proposed Draft Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan—BCC Transmittal Draft 20180000261/CPSP-2018-2 Transportation Element Adopted October 1997, amended through December 12, 2017 by Ordinance no. 2017-48) GOAL: pg. 10] TO PLAN FOR, DEVELOP AND OPERATE A SAFE, EFFICIENT, AND COST EFFECTIVETRANSPORTATIONSYSTEMTHATPROVIDESFORBOTHTHEMOTORIZEDANDNON- MOTORIZED MOVEMENT OF PEOPLE AND GOODS THROUGHOUT COLLIER COUNTY. OBJECTIVE 10: pg. 21] Encourage safe and efficient mobility for the rural public that remains consistent with the character of the rural areas of Collier County. Policy 10.3: pg.21] Everglades Boulevard, between Golden Gate Boulevard and 1-75, shall not be expanded beyond 4 lanes. Words underlined are added;words kth ro g- bh are deleted. denotes break in text.Row of asterisks Page 170 of 170 03/08/2019 9.A.3.k Packet Pg. 938 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution_2019-24 (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) Published DailyNaples, FL 34110 Affidavit of PublicationState of FloridaCounties of Collier and Lee Before the undersigned they serve as the authority, personally appeared Natalie Zollar who on oath says that she serves as Inside Sales Manager of the Naples Daily News, a daily newspaper published at Naples, in Collier County, Florida; distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida; that the attached copy of the advertising was published in said newspaper on dates listed. Affiant further says that the said Naples Daily News is a newspaper published at Na-ples, in said Collier County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Collier County, Florida; distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida, each day and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Naples, in said Collier County, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper.___________________________________________________________Customer Ad Number Copyline P.O.#_____________________________________________________________________________________ BCC/COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING DEV 2280005 PL20180000261 4500190197 Pub DatesMay 17, 2019 _______________________________________(Signature of affiant) Sworn to and subscribed before meThis May 17, 2019 _______________________________________(Signature of affiant) 9.A.3.l Packet Pg. 939 Attachment: CCPC Affidavit & Advertisement (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) +N APLESNEWS.COM z FRIDAY, MAY 17, 2019 z 21A ND-2280005 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that the Collier County Planning Commission [sitting as the local planning agency and the Environmental Advisory Council,]will hold a public meeting on June 6,2019,commencing at 9:00 A.M.in the Board of County Commissioners Chamber,Third Floor,County Government Center, 3299 East Ta miami Tr ail,Naples,FL. The purpose of the hearing is to consider: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 89-05,AS AMENDED,THE COLLIER COUNTY GROW TH MANAG EMENT PLAN OF THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA,RELATING TO THE GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN RESTUDY SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE CONSERVA TION AND COASTAL MANAG EMENT ELEMENT;DIRECTING TRANSMITTAL OF THE ADOPTED AMENDMENT TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY;PROV IDING FOR SEVERABILITY;AND PROV IDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.[PL20180000261] AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 89-05,AS AMENDED,THE COLLIER COUNTY GROW TH MANAG EMENT PLAN OF THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA,RELATING TO THE GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN RESTUDY SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE SOLID WA STE SUB-ELEMENT OF THE PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT;DIRECTING TRANSMITTAL OF THE ADOPTED AMENDMENT TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY;PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY;AND PROV IDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.[PL20180000261] AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 89-05,AS AMENDED,THE COLLIER COUNTY GROW TH MANAG EMENT PLAN OF THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA,RELATING TO THE GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN RESTUDY SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN ELEMENT AND THE GOLDEN GATE AREA FUTURE LAND USE MAP AND MAP SERIES;DIRECTING TRANSMITTAL OF THE ADOPTED AMENDMENT TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY;PROV IDING FOR SEVERABILITY;AND PROV IDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.[PL20180000261] AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 89-05,AS AMENDED,THE COLLIER COUNTY GROW TH MANAG EMENT PLAN OF THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA,RELATING TO THE GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN RESTUDY SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE STORMWATER MANAG EMENT SUB-ELEMENT OF THE PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT;DIRECTING TRANSMITTAL OF THE ADOPTED AMENDMENT TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY; PROV IDING FOR SEVERABILITY;AND PROV IDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. [PL20180000261] AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 89-05,AS AMENDED,THE COLLIER COUNTY GROW TH MANAG EMENT PLAN OF THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA,RELATING TO THE GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN RESTUDY SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE TRANSPORTAT ION ELEMENT;DIRECTING TRANSMITTAL OF THE ADOPTED AMENDMENT TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY;PROV IDING FOR SEVERABILITY;AND PROV IDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.[PL20180000261] AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 89-05,AS AMENDED,THE COLLIER COUNTY GROW TH MANAG EMENT PLAN OF THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA,RELATING TO THE GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN RESTUDY SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT AND FUTURE LAND USE MAP AND MAP SERIES;DIRECTING TRANSMITTAL OF THE ADOPTED AMENDMENT TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY;PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY;AND PROV IDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.[PL20180000261] AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 89-05,AS AMENDED,THE COLLIER COUNTY GROW TH MANAG EMENT PLAN OF THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA,RELATING TO THE GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN RESTUDY SPECIFICALLY TO CREATE THE URBAN GOLDEN GATE ESTAT ES SUB-ELEMENT OF THE GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN ELEMENT;DIRECTING TRANSMITTAL OF THE ADOPTED AMENDMENT TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY;PROV IDING FOR SEVERABILITY;AND PROV IDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.[PL20180000261] AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 89-05,AS AMENDED,THE COLLIER COUNTY GROW TH MANAG EMENT PLAN OF THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA,RELATING TO THE GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN RESTUDY SPECIFICALLY TO CREATE THE GOLDEN GATE CITY SUB-ELEMENT OF THE GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN ELEMENT;DIRECTING TRANSMITTAL OF THE ADOPTED AMENDMENT TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY;PROV IDING FOR SEVERABILITY;AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.[PL20180000261] AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 89-05,AS AMENDED,THE COLLIER COUNTY GROW TH MANAG EMENT PLAN OF THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA,RELATING TO THE GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN RESTUDY SPECIFICALLY TO CREATE THE RU RAL GOLDEN GATE ESTAT ES SUB-ELEMENT OF THE GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN ELEMENT;DIRECTING TRANSMITTAL OF THE ADOPTED AMENDMENT TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY;PROV IDING FOR SEVERABILITY;AND PROV IDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.[PL20180000261] All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard.Copies of the proposed ORDINANCE(S) will be made available for inspection at the GMD Zoning Division,Comprehensive Planning Section, 2800 N.Horseshoe Dr.,Naples,between the hours of 8:00 A.M.and 5:00 P.M.,Monday through Friday. Furthermore,the materials will be made available for inspection at the Collier County Clerk’s Office, Fourth Floor,Collier County Government Center,3299 East Ta miami Tr ail,Suite 401,Naples,one week prior to the scheduled hearing.Any questions pertaining to the documents should be directed to the GMD Zoning Division,Comprehensive Planning Section.Written comments filed with the Clerk to the Board’s Office prior to June 6,2019,will be read and considered at the public hearing. Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the Collier County Planning Commission will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore,may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made,which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding,you are entitled,at no cost to you,to the provision of certain assistance.Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division,located at 3335 Ta miami Tr ail East,Suite 101,Naples,FL 34112-5356,(239)252-8380,at least two days prior to the meeting.Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. Mark P.Strain,Chairman Collier County Planning Commission NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Planning Commission sitting as the local planning agency and the Environmental Advisory Council,commencing at 9:00 A.M.,June 6,2019,in the Board of County Commissioners Meeting Room,Third Floor,Collier Government Center,3299 East Ta miami Tr ail,Naples FL.,to consider: A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF AN ASPHALT AND CONCRETE BATCH-MAKING PLANT IN THE AGRICULTURAL (A)ZONING DISTRICT WITHIN THE RURAL FRINGE MIXED USE OVERLAY-RECEIVING LANDS PURSUANT TO SECTION 2.03.08 A.2.a.(3)(c)(viii)OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE,FOR 5.16±ACRES OF A 7.3±ACRE PA RCEL LOCATED APPROXIMATELY ONE HALF MILE NORTH OF TA MIAMI TRAIL EAST,AT THE END OF AUTO VILLAGE ROAD,IN SECTION 18,TOWNSHIP 51 SOUTH,RANGE 27 EAST,COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA.[PL20170002361] All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard.Copies of the proposed RESOLUTION will be made available for inspection at the Collier County Clerk’s Office,Fourth Floor,Collier County Government Center,3299 East Ta miami Tr ail, suite 401,Naples,FL,one week prior to the scheduled hearing.Written comments must be filed with the Zoning Division,Zoning Services Section,prior to June 6, 2019. Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the Collier County Planning Commission will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made,which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding,you are entitled,at no cost to you,to the provision of certain assistance.Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division,located at 3335 Ta miami Tr ail East,Suite 101,Naples,FL 34112-5356, (239)252-8380,at least two days prior to the meeting.Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. Collier County Planning Commission Mark Strain,Chairman ND-2280428 ND-2281183 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC)at 9:00 A.M.,June 6,2019,in the Board of County Commissioners Meeting Room,Third Floor,Collier Government Center, 3299 East Ta miami Tr ail,Naples FL.,to consider: AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NO.95-74,THE NAPLES HERITAG E GOLF AND COUNTRY CLUB PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT; BY REVISING THE MASTER PLAN TO REDUCE THE PRESERVE TRACT BY 2.90 ACRES AND ADD 2.90 ACRES AS A RECREATION AREA FOR THE RELOCAT ION OF THE TENNIS CENTER WITHIN TRACT A,JUST NORTH OF NAPLES HERITAGE DRIVE;AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.THE SUBJECT PROPERTY,CONSISTING OF 558±AC RES,IS LOCATED SOUTH OF DAVIS BOULEVARD AND WEST OF COLLIER BOULEVARD IN SECTIONS 3, 4,9 AND 10,TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH,RANGE 26 EAST,COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.[PL20180002619]SantaBarbaraBLVDDavisBLVDCollierBLVD!I Project Location All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard.Copies of the proposed ORDINANCE will be made available for inspection at the Collier County Clerk’s offi ce,fourth fl oor,Collier County Government Center,3299 East Ta miami Tr ail,suite 401,Naples,FL,one week prior to the scheduled hearing.Wr itten comments must be fi led with the Zoning Division,Zoning Services Section,prior to June 6,2019. Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the Collier County Planning Commission will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore,may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made,which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding,you are entitled,at no cost to you,to the provision of certain assistance.Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division,located at 3335 Ta miami Tr ail East,Suite 101,Naples,FL 34112-5356,(239)252-8380,at least two days prior to the meeting.Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Offi ce. Collier County Planning Commission Mark Strain,Chairman 9.A.3.l Packet Pg. 940 Attachment: CCPC Affidavit & Advertisement (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) NAPLESNEWS.COM ! FRIDAY, MAY 17,2019 T 2IA NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Noticeis herebygiventhattheCollierCounty PlanningCommission lsitting asthe localplanning agency and the Environmental Advasory Council,l will hold a public meeting on June 6, 2019, commencing at 9:00 A.M. in the Board of County Commissioners Chambet Third Floor, County Government Cente( 3299 East TamiamiTrail, Naples, FL. The purpose ofthe hearing is to consider: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 89.05, AS AMENDED, TTIE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN OF TTIE TJNINCORPORATED AX-EA OF COLLIER COT'NTY FLORIDA, RILATINC TO TI{E GOLDEN GATE AXXA MASTER PLAN RESTLIDY SPECIFICAILY AMENDING THE CONSERVATION AND COASTAI MANAGEMENT ELEMENT; DIR"ECTING TRANSMITTAI OF TIIE ADOPTED AMENDMENT TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF f,CONOI\,flC OPPORTUNITY; PROI'IDING FOR SEWRABILITY; AND PROI'IDING FOR AN EFFECTryE DATE. 1PL201800002611 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 89.05, AS AMEN'DED, T}IE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN OF IHE UNINCORPORATED AREA OT COLLIER COT]NTY FLORIDA, RI,LATING TO THE GOLDEN GATE ARXA MASTER PLAN RESTUDY SPECIT'ICAILY AMENDING THE SOLID WASTE SUB-ELEMENI OF TTIE PUBLIC FACILITIFS f,Lf,MENT; DIRXCTING TRINSMIITAI OF TIIE ADOPTED AMENDMEM TO ITIE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNIIY; PROVIDING FOR SEYERABILITY; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. IPL201800002611 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 8945, AS AMENDED, TI{E COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANACEMENT PLAN OF TIIE TNINCORPORATED ARXA OF COLLMR COINTY FLORIDA, RELATINC TO THE GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN RESTT'DY SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE GOLDEN GATE AIEA MASTER PI-AN DLEMENT AND TIII GOLDtrN GAIT AREA FUTURE LAND USE MAP AND MAP SERIES; DIRECTING TRANSMIITAI OF T}IE ADOPIED AMENDMENT TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROI'IDING FOR AN EFFECTnE DATE. [Pl20l&rc002611 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 89-05, AS AMENDED, TIIE COLLIER COUNTY GROWITI MANAGEMENT PIAN OF THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNry FLORIDA, Rf,LATING TO THE GOLDEN GATE ARXA MASTER PLAN RESTUDY SPECIFICAILY AME]\'DING THE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SUB.ELf,MENT OF TTIE PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMf,NT; DIRECTING TRANSMITTAI OF TI{E ADOPTID AMENDMENT TO TTM TLORIDA DEPARTMEM OF ICONOI,flC OPPORTUNITY; PRO\.IDING FOR SEYERABILITY; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. lPl,2or8fin026ll AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 89-05, AS AMtrNDED, T}IE COLLIIR COIINTY GROWIH MANAGEMENT PLAN OF T}IE TJNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COIJNTY FLORIDA, RTLATING TO TtM GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTIR PLAN RESTUDY SPECIFICAILY AMENDING THE TRANSPORTATION EI,EMENI; DIRECTING TRANSMIITAL OF TIIE ADOPIED AMENDMEM TO TTIE TLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ICONOMIC OPPORTLNTTY; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING FOR AN f,rFECTn'E DATE. [PL2018fln026U AN ORDINANCI AMENDING ORDINANCE 89-05, AS AMENDf,D, THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGIMENT PI,AN OF T1IE LTNINCORPORATED ARIA OF COLLIER COTINTY T'LORIDA, RXLATING TO THE GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN RESTUDY SPECIFICAI,LY AMEI\'DINGT}IE FUTIJRDLAND USE ELEMENT AND FUTURELAND USE MAP AND MAP SERIES| DIRICIING TRANSI\/trITAI OF TIIE ADOPTED AMENDMENT TO Tm TLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNTTY; PROYIDING FOR SEyf,RAAILITY; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATf,. IPL201800002611 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCf, E945, AS AMENDED, T}IE COLLER COT,INTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN OF TIIE I.'NINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COTNTY FLORIDA, RELATING TO THE COLDEN GAIE AR.EA MASTER PLAN R.ESTIJDY SPECMCAILY TO CREATE TH-E URSAN GOLDEN GATE TSTATf,S STIBELEMENT OF TTIE GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN ELEMENT; DIRECIING TR.ANSIIIITIAL OF TIIE ADOPTED AMENDMEM TO T}IE FLORIDA DEPARTNMNT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTIJNITY; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROYIDING FOR AN EFFECTIT.E DATE. [PL201800002611 9.A.3.l Packet Pg. 941 Attachment: CCPC Affidavit & Advertisement (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption) AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 89.05, AS AMEIiDEI\ THE COLLIER COT]NTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN OF THE UNINCORPORATED AX.EA OF COLLIf,R COT'NTY FLORIDA, RELATING TO T}IE GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN R.T,STUDY SPECMCAILY TO CRIATE TtM GOLDEN GATE CITY SUBELEMf,NT OF T}M GOLDEN GATE ARXA MASTER PLAN ELEMf,NT; DIRECTINC TRANSMITTAI OF T}IE ADOPIf,D AMENDMENT TO THE TLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTTJNITY; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING FOR AN ETTTCTIVE DATE. [PL r&m002611 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 89.05, AS AMENDED, TI{E COLLIER COUNTY GRO\{TH MANAGEMEM PI.AN OF TIIE T'NINCORPORATED ARXA OT' COLLIER COUNTY T'LORIDA, Rf,LATING TO THE GOLDEN GATE AX,EA MASTER PLAN RTSTUDY SPECIFICAILY TO CREAIE TIIE RURAL GOLDEN GATE ESTATES SU&ELEMENT OF THE GOLDEN GATE ARXA MASTER PLAN ELEMENT DIRECTING TRANSIVtrTTAL OF THE ADOPIED AMENDMENT TO T}M FI,ORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMC OPPORTUNITY; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROI'IDING FOR AN EFFECTTVE DATE. [PL201800002611 fllTUif rAll0 ust xrr .l -,1l -'r--a--1 AII interested parlies are invited to appear and be heard. Copies of the proposed ORDINANCEIS) will be made available lor inspection at lhe GMD Zoning Division, Comprehensive Planning Section, 2800 N. Hoceshoe Dr., Naples, between the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 5:00 PM., Monday through Friday. Furthermore, the materials will be made available for inspection at the Collier County Clerk's Office, Fourth Floor, Collier County Government Center,3299 East TamiamiTrail, Suite 401, Naples, one week prior to the scheduled haaring. Any questions pertaining to the documents should be directed to the GMD Zoning Division, Comprehensive Planning Section. Written commenls filed with the Clerk to the Board's Office priorto June 6, mi9, will be read and considered at the public hearing. Any person who decides to appealany decision ofthe Collie. County Planning Commission willneed a record ol the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensurethal a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. lf you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in thas proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of cedain assistance. Please contacl lhe Collier County Facilities Management Division, located at 3335 TamiamiTrail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 341,12-5356, (239)252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted lislening devices forthe hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners otfice. Mark P Strain, Chairman Collaer County Planning Commission L_. o 9.A.3.l Packet Pg. 942 Attachment: CCPC Affidavit & Advertisement (8850 : GGAMP Restudy Amendments Adoption)