Loading...
CCPC Minutes 04/04/2019April 4,2019 TRANSCRIPT OF TI{E MEETING OF THE COLLIER COUNTY PLANNTNG COMMISSION Naples, Florida, April 4,2019 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Collier County Planning Commission, in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein, met on tlis date at 9:00 a.m., in REGULAR SESSION in Building "F" of the Government Complex, East Naples, Florid4 with the following members present: CTIAIRMAN: KarenHomiak Stan Chrzanowski Patrick Dearbom Karl Fry Fdwin Fryer ABSENT: Mark Strain Joe Schmitt ALSO PRESENT: Mike Bosi, Planning and Zoning Manager Jeffiey Klatzkow, County Attomey Heidi Ashton{icko, Managing Assistant Coulty Attomey Scott Stone, Assistant County Attomey Tom Eastman, School District Repr€sentative Page 1 of 7 Collier County Planning Commission Page 1 Printed 3/28/2019 COLLIER COUNTY Collier County Planning Commission AGENDA Board of County Commission Chambers Collier County Government Center 3299 Tamiami Trail East, 3rd Floor Naples, FL 34112 April 4, 2019 9: 00 AM Mark Strain - Chairman Karen Homiak - Vice-Chair Edwin Fryer - Secretary Patrick Dearborn Karl Fry Stan Chrzanowski, Environmental Joseph Schmitt, Environmental Thomas Eastman, Collier County School Board Note: Individual speakers will be limited to 5 minutes on any item. Individuals selected to speak on behalf of an organization or group are encouraged and may be allotted 10 minutes to speak on an item if so recognized by the chairman. Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the CCPC agenda packets must submit said material a minimum of 10 days prior to the respective public hearing. In any case, written materials intended to be considered by the CCPC shall be submitted to the appropriate county staff a minimum of seven days prior to the public hearing. All material used in presentations before the CCPC will become a permanent part of the record and will be available for presentation to the Board of County Commissioners if applicable. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the CCPC will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto, and therefore may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. April 2019 Collier County Planning Commission Page 2 Printed 3/28/2019 1. Pledge of Allegiance 2. Roll Call by Secretary 3. Addenda to the Agenda 4. Planning Commission Absences 5. Approval of Minutes A. February 28, 2019 CCPC minutes B. March 7, 2019 CCPC Minutes 6. BCC Report - Recaps 7. Chairman's Report 8. Consent Agenda 9. Public Hearings A. Advertised 1. ***This item is being continued to the April 18, 2019 CCPC meeting.*** PUDR PL20180002020: An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida amending Ordinance No. 2009-21, as amended, the Esplanade Golf & Country Club of Naples Residential Planned Unit Development, and amending Ordinance No. 2004-41, the Collier County Land Development Code, by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of an additional 10± acres of land zoned Rural Agricultural (A) to the Esplanade Golf & Country Club of Naples RPUD; by amending the PUD document to revise a Development Standard Table footnote relating to setbacks; to increase the minimum required preserve area for the PUD; to update the Master Plan to label the additional PUD acreage as a Residential/Golf tract and show additional preserve area on that tract; to revise the PUD legal description; to add a deviation relating to environment; to modify development commitments relating to planning and environment; and by providing an effective date. The property to be added to the PUD is located just west of Collier Boulevard, approximately two-thirds of a mile north of Immokalee Road, in Section 22, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, with the entire PUD consisting of 1,668.3± acres. [James Sabo, AICP, Principal Planner] April 2019 Collier County Planning Commission Page 3 Printed 3/28/2019 2. ***This item was continued from the March 21, 2019, CCPC Meeting*** PL20180002552: An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners amending Ordinance 89-05, as amended, the Collier County Growth Management Plan for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida, specifically amending the Potable Water Subelement of the Public Facilities Element to amend Policy 1.7 to reference the updated Ten Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan, directing transmittal of the adoption amendment to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity, and furthermore providing for severability and providing for an effective date. (Adoption Hearing) [Coordinator: Sue Faulkner, Principal Planner] B. Noticed 10. New Business 11. Old Business 12. Public Comment 13. Adjourn April 4 2019 PROCEEDINGS MR. BOSI: Chair, you have a live mike. CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: Good morning. Welcome to the Collier County Planning Commission meeting of April 4th, 2019. Would you all please rise for the Pledge ofAllegiance. (The Pledge of Allegiance was recited in unison.) CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: Okay. Secretary, would you do roll call, please. COMMIS SIONER FRYER: Mr. Eastman? MR. EASTMAN: Here. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Mr. Chrzanowski? COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Hi, there. COMMISSIONER FRYER: MT. Fry? COMMISSIONER FRY: Here. COMMISSIONER FRYER: I'm here. Chairman Strain? (No response.) COMMISSIONER FRYER: Vice-chair Homiak? CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: Here. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Mr. Schmitt? (No response.) COMMIS SIONER FRYER: Mr. Dearbom? COMMISSIONER DEARBORN: Here. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Chair, we have a quomm of four -- five. CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: Five. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Excuse me. CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: Thank you. Okay. Addendum to the agenda: We have two items on the agenda, and one is being continued to April l8th. It's Esplanade Golf and Country Club of Naples residential PUD. And we need a motion to continue that, please. COMMISSIONER FRYER: So moved. COMMISSIONER CHMANOWSKI: Second. COMMISSIONER DEARBORN: Second. CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: All those in favoq signifu by saying aye. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Aye. COMMISSIONER FRY: Aye. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Aye. CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: Aye. COMMISSIONER DEARBORN: Aye. CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: Opposed like sign. (No response.) CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: And Planning Commission absences: Is everybody going to be here or - on the I 8th? COMMISSIONERFRY: Yes. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Yes. COMMISSIONER FRYER: YeS. CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: Patrick, you? COMMISSIONER DEARBORN: Yes. CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: Okay. Thanks. And approval ofthe minutes: February 2Eth,2019. Page 2 of 7 April 4, 2019 COMMISSIONER FRYER: I'll move their approval. COMMISSIONER FRY: Second. CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: Any changes or corrections? (No response.) CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: All those in favor, signift by saying aye. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Aye. COMMISSIONERFRY: Aye. COMMISSIONERFRYER: Aye. CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: Aye. COMMISSIONER DEARBORN: Aye. CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: Opposed like sign. (No response.) CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: And the March 7th meeting minutes. COMMISSIONER FRYER: I'll move their approval. CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: Is there a second? COMMISSIONER FRY: Second. CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: All those in favor, signi! by saying aye. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Aye. COMMISSIONERFRY: Aye. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Aye. CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: Aye. COMMISSIONER DEARBORN: Aye. CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: Opposed like sign. (No response.) CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: BCC report. MR. BOSI: Just to let the Planning Commission know, they did hear the Veterans MemoriaUlivingston Road GMP amendment. They had a 4-l vote to transmit to the state. They did impose a three-story height limitation. It would be what was proposed at four stories closest to Livingston Road intersection, the Board ofCounty Commissioners incorporated a three-story limitation on height. So that's going to be sent to the state and be brought back to the Planning Commission probably sometime June, July at the latest. CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: Thank you. MR. EASTMAN: Is that the Allura project? MR. BOSI: Yes, Allura. And when it comes back, it will have the Allura PUD associated with it, and the PUD will be probably the prominent focus ofthe adoption hearing. CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: Okay. Thank you. No chairman's report. No consent agenda items. So the only item on the agenda will be the l0-year water supply facilities work plan, and this is the adoption hearing. Sue? MS. FAULKNER: Yes. Hi. I'm Sue Faulkner with Comprehensive Planning in the Zoning Division. Ijust wanted to kind of refresh everyone's mind, because it's been a few months since we saw you on this project. We came to you in December and asked if you would approve for the BCC to transmit the petition to the Departuent of Economic Opportunity. You did do that unanimously in December, on the 6th, and the BCC had that on their summary agenda January 8th, and that was transmitted to the DEo, Department of Economic Opportunity, at that time. We're now coming back before you for the approval ofthe final water plan and the final changes Page 3 of 7 April 4, 2019 to tlle text of the GMPA. The text changes for the GMPA are very simple. We're changing the date that references the water plan in our public element -- our potable water sub-element of the Growth Management Plan. The date that was in the previous plan was October of2013, and it will now be changed to Febru ary 2019 . We do have one other very teeny, tiny change that was made by the county attomeys to make the language a little more clear, and that's in the sentence at the end ofthat one section of Policy 1.7, and it reads, "The county's l0-year water supply facilities work plan is incorporated herein by reference." And those are the two changes that have been made to Policy 1.7 ofthe sub-element. And we're asking for you to approve and recommend to the BCC that this be transmitted, once again, as a final approval to the DEO, and that's the action that should be taken today. I know that you were interested in the water plan, and you had many recommendations for some changes to the wording ofsome ofthe plan and how they were presented, some of tle tables and maps, et cetera. And there's a person here named Tom Chmelik thafs here as the director of the Engineering Division that is for Public Utilities, and he's going to make the presentation on the changes that occurred in the water plan. CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: Okay. Thank you. MR. CHMELIK: Yes, thank you. Tom Chmelik, engineering director, Public Utilities, for the record. I do have a presentation her€ that outlines some ofthe history Sue just explained and then the changes. So ifyou'd like, the pleasure ofthe Board, I'll go forward with that. CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: Sure. MR. CHMELIK: All right. Our objective today is, as Sue stated, that you adopt - recommended adoption of the plan and transmittal ofthe GMPA on to the DOE. Just summarizing the previous actions: This started in November of 2018 with our draft, and then December of2018 was when we last visited you, and the result ofthat were several recommended changes. And you did vote to forward this on to the Board of County Commissioners and eventually on to the DOE. So in December the comments and recommendation were received by the District, and then in January the Board voted unanimously to tansmit the GMPA, the plan and a summary ofthe proposed edits and changes. In January, the GMPA and other documents were forwarded to the DEO, and in February we received a letter ofno comment back as a response. So our current status is in the report tlrat you have. It summarizes all the changes. There's two versions there. There's the clean version and then a strikethrough and underline version showing the edits in green and yellow. So what I'd like to focus on now are really four areas that were highlighted when we were last before you, and then we'll address each of those changes. The first one had to do with the differpnce in the way population was reported in the AUIR and in this document, and they used different peaking factors. It's historically the way it was done the year before, and you asked that we align these. So that was done here. And you can see, when you compare one document to the other, now we do have the capacities aligned and the populations, so they all match up. And there was one discrepancy here. There was an erroneous piece of data reporting I 17 people in Hyde Park Village which should not have been there. So that was cleaned up in the process. The second item was to address the Marco Shores area and the way that was shown on our map. It had been shown as unserved and, in reality, it was served. Although, in the future, six months or so, an agreement will be approved. We suspect that we'll make that unserved again, but that's the extent ofthat change. And then the third one was talking about the per-capita use fttte and why it was higher than other areas, and I can summarize that by saying that our service area includes a larger seasonal population, it Page 4 of 7 April 4' 2019 contains a larger commuting workforce, there's a higher rate oftourism, there's more commercial activity, and a higher proportion of customers who irrigate with potable water. So all those factors tend to increase the per-capita use, and that is the explanation for the difference as was included in the report. And, finally, the fourth area dealt with water loss, and it was noted that that water loss for 2017 was higher than pr€vious years at approximately 9 p€rcent where other years were in the 5 percent range, and we have here a more detailed explanation of that discrepancy or change. And there were four really big events that were unusual that happened in that year. One was Hurricane Irmq very unusual, which caused more than 100 water-main breaks, 400 service-line breaks - that's the service line that goes to your home - and damage to fire hydrants, and all ofthis basically reduced the pressure to nearly zero in the system, and all that water was lost and not accounted for. So that was the hugest item. The next is -- COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Tom? MR. CHMELIK: Yes, go ahead. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Could I ask questions now? CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: Sure. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Just curiosity: How did Irma cause water-main and water-service breaks? What was the mechanism? MR. CHMELIK: Thanks for asking. Trees that are planted - COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Never mind. MR. CHMELIK: -- close to the mains tipped over, broke the lines. That's one of the reasons we request clearance from the water mains. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Okay. Thanks. MR. CHMELIK: Okay. And then the other item was operational. We had a 36-inch water main that was along Immokalee Road. It's a 6-mile-long run of pipe that's 36 inches in diameter, so that's a really large volume ofpipe, and it had been inactive for many years, and it was brought into service in 2007. And that main had to be flushed repeatedly to get the water quality where it needed to be to put it into service. And that waterjust kept having to be flushed, and that accounted for a large amount of loss. And that third item was an unusually active wildfirc season, and a lot of water was used to combat the fires throughout the eastem part of the county. So that was unusual, and then we also had two large diameter water-main breaks, 48-inch, 36-inch, and that was near the intersection of I-75 and 95 I , and that had to be repaired and then flushed as well after that process. So all ofthose activities really resulted in increasing that water-loss number in the 9 percent area; however, in 201 8 that number's come down in the 6 percent range, and wehe going to continue to monitor and address any potential losses in the system going forward. COMMISSIONER FRY: Madam Chairman, may I ask a question? CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: Sure. COMMISSIONER FRY: Tom, on the previous slide - and I should have maybe asked it then - MR. CHMELIK: Sure. COMMISSIONER FRY: - you talked about -- you explained the difference between the 150 gallons per day for Collier County ve6us I think it was 75 and 8l for Immokalee and Ave Maria. So it's way higher. And you gave the reasons on that slide. There is - within the document, there's evidence that we are working to improve our reclaimed water mechanism and use more and more reclaimed water for irrigation and such. ls that 150 gallons per day anticipated to go down as those efforts are moved forward? MR. CHMELIK: It would. If the - if there is more supply available to provide for irrigation, irrigation-quatity water, that would drive down the number, as well as conservation. COMMISSIONER FRY: ls the - the use of potable water for irrigation, would that be the largest - do you know whether that might be the largest factor in a huge difference in the gallons per day? MR. CHMELIK: Just a moment. Page 5 of 7 April 4,2019 I don't tlrink we can say it's the larges! but it's really a combination ofall ofthese. COMMISSIONER FRY: Okay. Thank you. MR. CHMELIK: Thank you. CTIAIRMAN HOMIAK: Are there any other questions, or do you need to go through this draft again or -- no? Ned? COMMISSIONER FRYER: No. Well, there's one reference that maybe could be cleaned up, and that is on Page 158 of394, Packet Page 158, Document 3-1. ln the first full paragraph under - well, I guess it's the second full paragraph under the new 3.1, there's a reference to the town of Rural Lands West. MR. CHMELIK: Oh, okay. COMMISSIONER FRYER: That probably should be changed; should it not? MR. CHMELIK: Yes, to River Grass Village. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Yeah. MR. CHMELIK: Very good. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Thank you. MR. CHMELIK: We will address tha! sir. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Thank you. CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: Patrick, do you have anything? COMMISSIONER DEARBORN; I do not. CIIAIRMAN HOMIAK: Nobody has any other questions or -- (No response.) CIIAIRMAN HOMIAK: Oh, Ned doesn't have another question? COMMISSIONER FRYER: No, I don't. I have a motion ready to go, if you'd like to hear that. CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: Okay. COMMISSIONER DEARBORN: I have a second. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Maybe I'll verbalize it. CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: I'm asking for a motion to adopt as the CCPC and the EAC. COMMISSIONER FRYER: You want it - CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: Separate motions, I guess. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Same motion or joint - separate orjoint? CI{AIRMAN HOMIAK: Does it need to b€ separate? MR. STONE: You can do them separately. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Okay. I'll start with the CCPC; that we make that motion, we recommend approval to the CCPC (sic). COMMISSIONER DEARBORN: Second. CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: All those in favor, signifu by saying aye. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Aye. COMMISSIONER FRY: Aye. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Aye. CHAIRMANHOMIAK: Aye. COMMISSIONER DEARBORN: Aye. CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: Opposed like sign. (No response.) CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: Okay. And for the EAC? COMMISSIONER FRYER: I'll make the same motion except this time for the EAC to recommend approval to the CCPC (sic). MS. STONE: I think you mean - COMMISSIONER FRY: Second. CIIAIRMAN HOMIAK: BCC, you mean. Page 6 of 7 April 4, 2019 COMMISSIONER FRYER: That's what mean, yes. COMMISSIONER FRY: Second. CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: Okay. All those in favor, signiS by saying aye. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Aye. COMMISSIONER FRY: Aye. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Aye. CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: Aye. COMMISSIONER DEARBORN: Aye. CHAIRMAN HOMTAK: Opposed like sign. (No response.) CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: Okay. That passes. MR. CHMELIK: Thank you, Commissioners. CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: That's it. Thank you. And we have no new business, no old business. And public comment? (No response.) CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: I don't see any. Is there a motion to adjourn? COMMISSIONER FRYER: So moved. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Second. CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: All those in favor? Oh, second. Sorry. All those in favor? COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Aye. COMMISSIONER FRY: Aye. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Aye. CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: Aye. COMMISSIONER DEARBOPN: Aye. CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: Opposed like sign. (No response.) rir,rr.:r There being no further business for the good ofthe County, the meeting was adjoumed by order ofthe Chair at 9: l7 a.m. COLLIER COI,JNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT & COMPTROLLER These minutes approved by the Board *, Sl U, ln .aspresenrsd / or as corrected TRANSCRIPT PREPARED ON BETIALF OF U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT, NC., BY TERRI LEWIS, COURT REPORTER AND NOTARY PUBLIC. Page 7 ol7