Resolution 2003-137
RESOLUTION NO. 03--.ll7
17B
RELATING TO PETITION NUMBER
VA-2002-AR-3418, FORAN AFTER-THE-FACT
V ARIANCE ON PROPERTY HEREINAFTER
DESCRIBED IN COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida in Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, has
conferred on all counties in Florida the power to establish, coordinate and enforce zoning and
such business regulations as are necessary for the protection of the public; and
WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a Land Development Code
(Ordinance No. 91-102) which establishes regulations for the zoning of particular geographic
divisions of the County, among which is the granting of variances; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Zoning Appeals, being the duly elected constituted Board of
the area hereby affected, has held a public hearing after notice as in said regulations made and
provided, and has considered the advisability of 1.5 feet variance from the required rear yard
setback of 20 feet, as specified by the Riviera Golf Estates PUD Ordinance No. 78-58, Section
1-2-A-3, to a setback of 18.5 feet as shown on the attached plot plan, Exhibit "A", in a PUD
Zone for the property hereinafter described, and has found as a matter of fact that satisfactory
provision and arrangement have been made concerning all applicable matters required by said
regulations and in accordance with Section 2.7.5 of the Zoning Regulations of said Land
Development Code for the unincorporated area of Collier County; and
WHEREAS, all interested parties have been given opportunity to be heard by this
Board in public meeting assembled, and the Board having considered all matters presented;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY the Board of Zoning Appeals of
Collier County, Florida, that:
The Petition V A-2002-AR-3418 filed by Roland and Stella Ricard, with respect to the
property hereinafter described as:
Lot 489, Riviera Golf Estates Unit 2, Section 17, Township 50 South, Range 26
East, Collier County, Florida.
be and the same hereby is approved for a 1.5 feet variance from the required rear yard setback
of 20 feet, as specified in Riviera Golf Estates PUD, Ordinance No. 78-58, Section 1-2-A-3, to
to 18.5 feet as shown on the attached plot plan, Exhibit "A" of the PUD Zoning District
wherein said property is located, subject to the following conditions:
Exhibit "B"
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution relating to Petition Number
V A-2002-AR-34 I 8 be recorded in the minutes of this Board.
178
This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote.
Done this
Bfh
day of ~~
,2003.
ATTEST:
DWJ8HT~?BRq~K,CLERK
BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
COLrg
TOM HENNING, CHAIRMAN
t..(~.o~
-8lr imn~ '*-~.it-
- -;:: Atttst '.t.-to'Chafnna . s
''''$:1~tur~ cr,1;<.
Approved'as to Form
~ug.] Slwo".ncy:
. -~~\dw
atrick G. White
Assistant County Attorney
V A-02-AR-3418/MD
178
~IS~ i
; I~ i :i~~~a;si:~ ~ d ~ g
Ii iljilij~~"'~bl(g~!~~ ~ E ~!l~ ~ !
lil!ll!l ~~':JI~~~I~;;~ 'i~~ B~lil ~ . . ~
~~ii. ~!i~i~~i~~~~~~ ~;i !~; i I i Ii :
h~~t ~ ~ ~a f!~~ n ~~~ ~~~ ~h ~ a . ~
I ~ !l!!: i ~ ~i El !! tl~ ~ to
f- ~ ~ ti ~ Iil ~ t! 1:Jt; ~ R
Ii ~ 3. ~~~!i~ 1:J~~ ::I:.. i ~ ~
~ iJ - >- . z" 8\!I "l:!l'I ,. g~",
a !;; nl5 ~~ t<l .i'~~t1h /!!"'P, ;,j~~~~i=l" ~
II ii '3 ~ i:l[; ~ s.q~"~,'l!ll'l~l ~l"'~~~~ 8
:~t ~:i~il:~ ~~~! ~:~~~~~iii~~~~hj ~ ~
il~!~::~~!~n~b~~~~ i~~~P~:~~!U~~~i~ ~
:llj~ i!lf:l"e".>eses~"l~~"c ~""il!.t..!;(>-"'~"I!I-l!l'rl",,,H "
1I.1t" 11....~..~.Il."tll "II ~;::~~IIff!~!:: S!z;fl-&I~"':J', w
1\ 'J \oJ ~ ~ ~ l..l FI 7- AI (,Il ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ b.... 'ja ~
a~B~...~~15ei...~~~ 16I~ ~L r-ltIl~t.."a~"'~"'~'i-~ti~I'1 l>,.:]
l) }I.:l .................'......10 a:;z: ..1\1 C"l ~
it: en ..
U if, "'C111<~ C>
>:::1 to) i::u.... .....:g
.l f!; u. ..::s ~ .!. t 01< I
1: s~ ~g,. p g ~..... !' 0
d>~NV\ <;:....
U'
C"l..
UJ 5)
If1 ..
u; lJ1
(lJ
:I: C
Vl
Q.
~
--,
;~
C\i'" 1l
;:;~l!il~
~"':if
"" Qi: ~.
~~~il
tJl;J!Hi
Z l.o...;I-.;:.J
eh:~U
;{~~h
~.r ~:1
it ~ (')'i~
~ E'~~ l~
<J
I-~ "
~~~-~
~!5~<-
....ljO":l,/
..., l. ",,:,
~"f:....h
~~~
.._a
-tl~
i~D-.
t-r~
.. "
~b...
>
5[(0=
E~~
ii1~~
~I-~
~~~
~~~
'l~~
It:l-I..
~~i
~..~
-c~135
:lI;!~~
tjf t;
>,- -
a:l(i!
z ~~~9
Cl ?=:f'-
...., Utnr-,'
~ 1 ~~~ ~
~- ~ ~:;I~
;~. ~!~~
(k': eirQ~
~:j ~~~~l
C>
C>
'"
C ~ 5
Nil...!.
Iii .., #g
~ P ~ - ON
~g 3 ~ ~
"0-< V\ U ~
CCI
11:I
,.......
....01
~~.!,
"'11:I
. '"
!ii~
~Sl.
001
-'1-
....fa.
0....
....0011:I
Uto -el-
~ lN~~
r;; :
'" ~
~ ~
z
o
Vl
;..
~
z
o
V1
>.
"-
:I:
_J
~
<l:
y
~ i
~ D-
n< ~
u
~ L.J
UU
~~!
~gj~
V3U3.
,~
I=H".iI.J
Z .J
~I...JI-
1:J.......
n<(I~-
ft:l? z
j8~;1
I-LY ~re
-~-iQW
.~o~~
:-.z <I:I_
<1 Vl
Y.-l~cy
.JUa::I....
Jc..t"<l:L..
-:j
>.
".,
--=::::::f- (,1t
t::
I
~<l !@
~ ~ "- "\/1 ,op 313/1/3 Xnl'3I1lKJII 1\:1
~ tl ~--- o"'d'S-.ii'.IJ{-'I"I~Eff,8i.iio'N
ltl~
...
...
~
l~
'"
~;;
"-"
- I(~ij'fii1j.'''''C~;8c:a(fN~
(N '. ~', ."~! ~ n :;). .(~~.. 'I' '.~I(I~'
"
'"
d ~
L...i= "{-J
c ~"'l:
--" . ~
,ilJl1~ AJ1NA .1 .
(!\I.,]j.6'POf
(r;/M'8'''Ol
'" ... ~
.~~
-" -I-~ -;- - ----
I L>~ L.I~
~~ I '"~ ~~
~~ I ~ (~
~lt)
Qj~
b,p/.8C.(.lO'S
;3,t;f:,8&.O()'S
I
",E!
hl__ r::~
"J'(I.8 ----....
n .__ __ __ __~_ _ _
z
o
t: C\l
t'\I 0 C:>
Q C:>
Z -< ('I
S I:Q(~
{/) j.....
:; {/)....
~ .
~O:...:j
~,;:)
0''''
~
"11
I
I €; ~
t\ ~ii>
I \ al~
Il.j
~ ::k ~
I'" ~~
I ~~
...."
I tli :-
"'0'1
(btll
"iVi
.;n;]
o
en;:;
~~
'"
E-<g
O~
....:l
c:o~
c:oEl
-.:t<~
E-<~
o
....:l
"
!l:llj
1..;..
lC)
~~
5~
....:l
co
~e
<-9;
...d ~
O~ ~
....:l ~
~I!~~ sJ
. !'O~~~~Q
! . ~ ~~ ~
~ ~~~~h
V A-2002-AR-3418
PROJECT #2002080023
DATE: 12/3/02
DON SCHNEIDER
-
-
Exhibit "A"
178
CONDITIONS OF AFFROV AL
V A-2002-AR-3418
a) This variance is for the encroachment shown in Exhibit "A" only. Any further
encroachments will require a separate variance request.
b) Pursuant to Section 2.2.25.8.1 of the Land Development Code, if, during the
course of site clearing, excavation or other construction activity an historic or
archaeological artifact is found, all development within the minimum area
necessary to protect the discovery shall be immediately stopped and the Collier
County Code Enforcement Department shall be contacted.
c) In the case of the destruction of the encroaching structure, for any reason, to an
extent equal to or greater than 50 percent of the actual replacement cost ofthe
structure at the time of its destruction, any reconstruction shall conform to the
provisions of the Land Development Code in effect at the time of reconstruction.
EXHIBIT "B"