BCC Minutes 05/20/1980 R
Naples, Florida, May 20, 1980
LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Board of County Commi~-
sioners in and for the County uf Collier, and also acting as
the Governing DoardCs) of such special districts as have
been created according to law and having conducted business
herein, met on this date at 9:00 A.M. in Regular Session in
Building "F' of the Courthouse Complex with the following
members prer-ent:
CHAIRMAN: Clifford Wenzel
VICE-CHAIRMAN: Thomas P. Archer
John A. Pistor
C. R. "Russ" Wimer
David C. Brown
ALSO PRESENT: William J. Reagan, Clerk; Harold L. Hall,
Chief Deputy Clerk/Fiscal Office~; Edna Brenneman, Deputy
Clerk; C. Nilliam Norman, County Manager: Donald A. Pickworth,
County Attorney; Clifford Barksdale, Public Works Administrator,
County Engineer; Dr. Jay Harmic, Environmentalist: Thomas Hafne:
p' ~lic Safety Administrator; Terry Virta, Community Development
Administrator: Irving Berzon, Utilities Division Director;
Jeffory Perry, Zoning Director: Dr. Danny Crew, Planning Direco
Lee Layne, Planner: Gene Willett, Administrative Assistant to
County Manager; Mary Morgan, Administrative Aide to Eoard of
County Commissioners; and, Deputy Chief Raymond Barnett, Sherif:
Department.
~OOl( 053 PACE 282
May 20, 1980
AGENDA - APP~OVED WITH DELETIONS AND ADDITION
Upon motion by Commissioner Archer, seconded by Com-
missioner Pistor and unanimously carried, the agenda was
approved with the following addition and deletions:
1. Petition FDPO-V-7, William Slocum, requesting
a variance from the minimum base flood eleva-
tion, as required under FDPO 79-62 (continued
from 4/22 and 5/6/80 agendas) - Withdrawn.
2. Petition R-80-4-C, Thomas Kraus, requesting
rezoning from "A" to "PUD" for property located
in Section 1, T50S, R25E - Withdrawn.
3. Petition CP-80-4-C, Bruce Green and Associates,
requesting Comprehensive Plan Amendment on Lot
104, Naples Grove and Truck Company's Little
Farms No. 2 - Withdrawn from agenda (scheduled
in error).
4. Petition R-80-8C, Bruce Green and Associates,
requesting rezoning on Lot 104, Naples Grove
and Truck Company's Little Farms No.2 - With-
dravm from agenda (scheduled in error).
5. ~ward of Did3 for construction of Willoughby
Acres Water and Sewer Improvements - Added under
Utility Director's Report.
MI!'-IU':'ES OF ~IEETING OF APRIL 29, 1983 - APPROVED
Commissio:ler Archer moved, seconded by Commissioner
pistor and unani:nously carried.. that the minutes of the
meeting of April 29, 1980 be approved as presented.
PETITION R-79-30C, KINGS LAKE (SOUTH), WAFAA F. ASSAAD FOR
POWER DEVELOP'E:~T CORPORATION/KINGS i,l\KE, LTD. - WITHDRAWN
AT REQ0E3T OF PETITIONER
Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily
News on January 25, 1980 as evidenced by Affidavit of P~blica-
tion previously filed with the Clerk, Petition H-79-30C, filed
by Wafaa F. Assaad for Power Development Corporation/Kings
Lake Ltd., w~s withdrawn upon request of the Petitioner, public
hearing having been continued from February 26, 1980.
PETITION CP-80-4C, BRUCE GREEN AND ASSOCIATES, REQUESTING
COMPREHENS;:VE PLAN AMENDMENT RE RESIDENTIAL LAND USE ON LOT
104, NAPLES GROVE AND TRUCK COMPANY'S LITTLE FARMS NO.2 _
REMOVED FROM AGENDA (SCHEDULED IN ERROR)
It was noted that Petition CP-80-4C was inadvertently
scheduled on the agenda in error, public hearing to be held
June 3, 1980, as advertised.
~"". n~1 N.., ?~R
c:J~~ 053 pm 287
May 20, 1980
PETITION R~80-8C, BRUCE GREEN AND ASSOCIATES, REQUESTInG
REZONING FROM VARIOUS ZONING DISTRICTS TO "PUD" FOR PROPERTY
LOCATED (IN LOT 104, NAPLES GROVE }',ND TRUCK COMPANY'S LITTLE
FARMS NO. 2 - WITHDRAWN FROM AGENDA (SCHEDULED IN ERROR)
It was noted that Petition CP-80-4C,was inadvertently
scheduled on the agenda in error, pUblic hearing to be held
June 3, i980, as advertised.
PETITION A-80-1-C, MARVETA SHAW, APPEALING ZONING DIRECTOR'S
DECISION RE KEEPING CHICKENS IN RESIDENTIALLY-ZONED DISTRICT -
APPEAL DENIED; STAFF DIRECTED TO REVIEW PERTINENT ORDINANCE
TO CLARIFY TYPE OF ANIMALS PERMITTED
Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily
News on May 4, 1980, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication
filed with the Clerk, public hearing was held to consider
Petition A-80-I-C, filed by Marveta Shaw, appealing the
Zoning Director's decision with regard to the keeping of
chickens on residentially-zoned property located at
1202 Trail Terrace, Naples, Florida.
Zoning Director Jeffory Perry referred to the Executive
Summary dated May 5, 1980 to point out the facts considered
when making the determination which resulted in the appeal
under dis~ussion. Among the relevant facts, said Mr. Perry,
are: I) Ms. Shaw was found to be keeping approximately II
chickens within a fenced yard: 2) The appellant was told by
Zoning Department authorities that the keeping of chickens
was not permitted in the "RM-IA" District; and, 3) While
the keeping of fowl is specifically listed as all accessory
use in the Estates and as a principal use in Agricultural
Districts, it is not liste~ in the "RM-IA" ~r "RS-4" resi-
d~ntial dictricts.
Ms. Marveta Shaw explained that the chickens in question
are her pets and added the following information upon which
her appeal is based: l) She is not running a farm or any kind
of commercial business; 2) There dre not enough chickens to
cause a smell, noting that letters to this effect have been
submitted: 3) There is no rooster among the chickens to create
May 20, 19(10
a neighhorhood disturbance, 4) The chicken3 are confined
within a 50 x 80 foot fenced area; and, 5) The chickens,
being penned, do not cause as large a problem as the dogs
in the area being permitted to run loose and creating a
nuisance.
The letters referred to by Ms. Shaw and filed for
the record, are as follows:
1. Jackie F. Cail
2. Mrs. Audrey E. Henlay
3. Sheri J. Shaw
4. Ru~sell W. Hemming
Speaking in support of Ms. Shaw's appeal, were the
following persons:
1. Willard Hedden - 4506 Normandy Drive
2, Jackie F. Cail - 1200 Trail Terrace
3. Arvena Iledden - 1235 Cypress Woods Drive
During the discussion which followed, Ms. Shaw present
pictures of two of her "pets" which she said are permitted
the kItchen 0 f h"" ,10me and which she spec i f ically reCjueste
she be allowed to retain.
The provisions of the pertinent ordinance were discuss
with e".,rcssions of sympathy toward the petitioner forthcon
and with County Attorney Pickworth pointing out that 7.oainS
laws are not only for the protection of the health and welt
of the County, but they are also d0$igned to protect the
aesthetic ilnd economic values of property.
Mr. Perry reite
ated that the c.ecision was based on the fact that "A" and
"E" DistrIcts mention the keeping of fowl or poultry for co
mercial or accessory uses to residents; however, since such
use3 arc not rr.entioned in other districts, it was felt that
such Gmission was intended to disallow the keeping of such
animals on residential property.
It was suggested by Chair
Wenzel and Commissioner Wimer that possibly the ordinance w
not sufficiently explicit in stipulating which animals may'
m~y nnt hp pprmittpn.
eOOK 053 PACE 288
B~ax 053 p;cr 289
May 20, 1980
There were no additional persons indicating a desire
to address the subject, whereupon Commissioner Archer moved,
seconoed by Commissioner Pistor and ~~animously carried,
that the puhlic hearing be closed.
Conmlissioner Brown moved that the appeal filed by
Ms. Shaw be granted. Commissioner Brown agreed to the
sugqcsted amendment to the motion, as voiced by Commissioner
Wimer in his seconding thereof, to the effect that the staff
be instructed to draft an ordinance covering the keeping of
animals, noting that the subject needs clarification. Upon
call for the question, the motion failed 2/3 with Commissioners
Pistnr, Archer and Wenzel voting in opposition.
ChairnlLln Wenzel dixected the staff to "look into" the
question with regard to being more explicit on the type of
i'lnimals that peoplE" may keep, suggesting the possibility
that more flexibility is needed with regard to small pets
such LIS the type discussed.
PETITION CCC L- 80- 2C, EDWARD JlILLSTROM - ARCHITECT, REQUESTING
COASTAL CONSTRUCTION CONTROL LINE VARIANCE ON PROPERTY IN
SECTIONS 29 AND 30, T4BS, R25E, VILLAS OF VANDERBILT BEP.CH -
DEN. ED; P1WPOSED l\MENDMENTS TO PERTINENT ORDINANCE TO BE
ORAL-TED r:JR FUTURE PRESENTATION TO DCC
Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily
News on May 4, 1980 as evidenced by Affidavit of publication
filed with tile Clerk, public hearing was opened to consider
Petition CCCL-80-2C, filed by Architect Edward Hillstrom for
Union Properties of Southwest Florida, Inc., requesting a
variance to the Coastal Construction Control Line for property
in Sections 29 and 30, Towrship 48 South, Range 25 East. As
noted in the petition, the purpose in requesting the variance
is to permit the construction of a seawall, backfill, and
provide access boardwalk to the bea,h area in conjunction with
the construction of the villas of Vanderbilt Beach.
Dr. Jay Barmic, County Environmental Consultant, located
the subject property on the map displayed, explaining in further
May 20, 1980
detail the proposed seawall construction which h~ tidid will
conform to the seawalls immediately to the south. lie pointed
out that a previous variance was granted for construction of
the condominium building which is underway. Dr. HP'1~mic ad.-
vised thilt he received a telephone call from Bernie Yokel,
local environmentalist, who expressed the thought that the
proposal would be an improper use of the beachfront, and
that an additional call was received from an opponent, and
stating that she would be in attendance at the public hear-
ing. Dr. Harmic called the Board's attention to Condition
No.4 of the proposed resolution, as follows:
If, in the event, shoreline erodes or is washed
away from the proposed wall, so as to preclude
public passage on the beach, the Community Devel-
opment Administrator shall have the authority to
require the owner of the varied land to restore
or provide such beach pedestrian passage. Plans
a~d specifications for such provision shall be
approved by the Community Development Administrator.
Dr, lIilrmic said thilt the above-referenced Condition was imposed
in an attempt to alleviate future problems, also noting that he
transmitted a copy of the resolution, containing all of the con-
ditions, to the petitioner but that, as yet, there has been no
response.
Lengthy discussion followed the presentation by Dr. Harmic
which included such matters as the use of riprap rather than
seawalls, the fact that the vegetation line is not well-defined,
the location of the seawall from the m.h.w. line and the eleva-
tian, the fact that it has been recommended that variances such
as the type being considered be avoided so dS to prevent erosion
of beache3 and natural areas of the coastlines, and other per-
tinent topics. Dr. Harmic, responding to Commissioner Brown,
said that on the basis of the existing seawall in the particular
area, ann also because of the conditions imposed, he is recom-
mending that the petition be approved.
Mr. Edward Hillstrom, representing the developer, offered
I
no additional comments other than expressing his concurrence
BOOK 053 PACe 290
eO~K 053 PACE 291
May /.0, 1980
with the statements ml'lde by Dr. HarTJ1ic.
It was Commi&dioner
Archer's suggestion that, before the petitioner ~grees to the
condition referred to by Dr. Harmic, it should be considered
carefully since the restoration contained therein would be a
costly mi1ttcr.
^ further comment by the Commissioner was that,
although he does not like to disagree with the County's staff,
in this case he cannot "buy what they are proposing".
The following persons were in att~ndance to voice opposi-
tion to the requested variance:
1. George F. Keller, Chairman of the Zoning Com-
mittee of the Collier County Civic Federation
2. Betty Gulacsik
3. Arndt L. Mueller, President of the Collier
County Audubon Society
4. Mike Moore, Director of the Vanderbilt Beach
Property Owners' Association
5. Ci1rl Gilzow, President of.the Vanderbilt
3Ci1ch Property Owners' Associa~ion
"ead and filed for the record waG a letter of opposition dated
May 13, 1980, signed by Andrew Gulacsik, Jr. and Mrs. Bettie L.
Gulacsi~, wherein it is stated that the natural beauty of
CJllier Cnunty's beaches and coastlines are rapidly disappear-
ing due to uncontrolled and indiscrimate buildinq ~nd variance
allowances, and that seawalls and backfills of the type requested
disturb the delicate balance of sea life.
All opponents and proponents having been heard, r:mnrnissioner
Pistor moved, seconded by Commissioner Archer and unanimously
carried, that the public hearing be closed.
Commissioner Pistor moved, seconded by Commissioner Archer
and carried unanimously, that Petition CCCL-80-2C, filed by
Edward Ilillstrom, Architect, be denied.
It was suggested by Commissioner Wimer that the ordinance
regulating variances such as the one acted upon be brought
back to the Board for possibl~ amendments with the Director
o[ Cl.'IIUlIUllity Development Terry Virta advising that work has
already been started on the ordinance and that a proposal to
May 20, 19!10
the Bonrd will be made shortly for strengthening of the
pertinent ordinance.
RECESS:
10:10 A.M. until 10:l7 A.M.
OkDINANCE 80-46 RE PETITION IZ--80-I-I, J.APC, REQUESTING
DUFFER F'OR COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL ZONED PROPERTY ADJACENT
TO RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES - ADOPTED, PURSUANT TO STAFF RECOM-
MENDATIONS
Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily
News on March 13, 1980 as evidenced by Affidavit of PubJicatior
previously filed with the Clerk, public hearing was continued
from April 1 and April 15: 1980 for consideration of Petition
IZ-80-]-1, filed by the Immokalee Area Plann1:,g Commission,
req\\E':H.ing il buffer for Commercial and Industrial zoned
property ildjacent to Residential zoned properties.
Zo~ing Director Je~fory Perry recalled that the Board
requested the Planning Staff to prepare for consideration
dn amendmpnt to the Immokalee Zvning Ordinance to provide
buffer and setback requirements for the above-referenced
zoning districts, noting that the directive was pursuant to
a public hearing regarding the rezoning of certain Immokalee
property. The IAPC originally denied the proposal; however,
it was reconsidered by the IAPC and at the April 30, 1980
meeting of the Planning Commission they agreed to recommend
approval to the Board upon the conditions that: I) the
ordinance require yard setbacks to be provided by the property
proposed for rezoning which would abut existing commercial and
industrial zoned land; and, 2) the ordinance apply to rezoned
properties a~ter the effective adoption date of the ordinance
and not to properties presently zoned. The provisions are in-
cluded in the ordinance being presented, said Mr. Perry.
There being no persons to address the issue, Commissioner
Brown moved, seconded by Commissioner Archer and unanimously
carried, that the public hearing be closed.
BOOK 053 PAGf 292
BQa~ 053 rAcE '293
May 20, 19130
Commissioner Brown moved, seconded by Commissioner
Archer and un&nimously carried, that Ordinance 80-46, as
entitled below, be adopted and entered in Ordinance Book
No. II.
ORDINANCE 80 - ~
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 74-15,
ARTICLE V, GENERAL PROVISIONS; ARTICLE
XI, SECTION 11.11, IC-I, COMMERCIAL DIS-
TRICT, ARTICLE XI, SECTION 11.12, I-C-2
COMMERCIAL DISTRICT; ARTICLE XI, SEC-
TION 11.13, I-C-3, COMMERCIAL-LIGHT IN-
DUSTRIAL DISTRICT, ARTICLE XI, SECTION
11.14 I-C-4, COMMERCIAL-LIGHT INDUSTRIAL
DISTRICT; AND, ARTICLE XI, SECTION 11.15,
I-I INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT.
C"'.OINM'Cr: 8 0-4 7 ESTABLISHING PARKING REGULATIONS FOR THE
UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY - ADOPTED
Leg;)] notice haJing been published in the Naples Daily
News on May 1, 1980 as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication
filed with the Clerk, public hearing was opened to consider
a proposed comprehensive ordinance establishing parking
regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County.
Administrative Assistant to the County Manager Gene
Willett recalled that in October, 1979 the Board directed
the staff to establish a $25.00 fine for parking in a fire
zone and, to accomplish the task, it is desirable to change
the present Parking Ordinance from a permitting system to
a traffic fine and enforcement system. He stated that the
changr is recommended ~~imarily due to the unenforceability
of the current ordinance and that the ordinance presented
basically tracks through Chapter 31ti FS, to determine parking
violations, and establishes the administrative procedure to
be utilized by the Clerk of the County Court and the judicial
system. Furthermore, said Mr. Willett, the proposed ordinance
hu3 beeo review~u uy the County Attorney, the Clerk, the
Sheriff, the Publi~ Works Division, a~d by Judge Hayes.
May 20, 1980
Mr. Willett pointed out the various minor changes which
have been made to the draft copy, provided as backup material
to the Executive Summary, and the final ordinance.
There was a brief discussion regarding parking on bikp.-
paths, a matter of concern expressed by Mike Zewalk which is
prohibited under the term~ of the ordinance; parking on narrow
streets; whether or not signs are necessary; and other pertin-
ent matters.
There being no persons registered to address the Board,
Cormnissioner Archer moved, seconded by Commissioner Brown and
unanimously carried, that the public hearing be closed. It
wag noted that Ms. Delor.is Jackson and Ms. Nancy Bisbee, having
registered, declined the opportunity to comment.
Deputy Chief Barnett observed that it will be necessary
to "put one more man on" to serve warrants and, possibly, a
clerk, at an estjmated cost of somewhere between $25,000 and
$45,000. ~lr. Willett replied that it is hoped that th(' ad-
ditional revenues generated will offset those expenditures.
Commissioner Pis tor moved, seconded by Commissioner Archer
that Ordil~rtnce 80-47, Establishing Parking Regulations for the
Unincorporated Area of Collier County, be adopted and entered
Ln Ordinance Book No. 11. Upon call for the question, the
motion was unanimously carried.
ORDINANCE NO, 80 - ~
AN ORDINANCE TO PROVIDE PARKING REGULATIONS
FOR THE UNTNCOHPORATED AREAS OF COLLIER
COUNTY; PROVIDIr:; A SHORoC TITrE; ESTABLISHING
JURISDICTION; DEFINING CERTAIN TERMS; PLACE-
liENT OF OHICIAL PARKING SIGNS; AUTHORIZING
THr: BOAlill OF COUNT'" COM!iISSIOl'{CRS BY RESOLU-
TION TO REGULATE PARKING; PROVIDING PARKING
REGULATIONS; PROVIDING FOR PUBLIC PARKING
SPACES FOR CERTAIN llAHTlICAPFED PERSONS;
ESTA8LISING PENALTIES FOR VIOLATIONS OF
PARKING REGULATIONS; PROVIDING FOR THE
ISSUANCE OF COUNTY PARKING CITATIONS; ESTAB-
LISHING PROCEDURES GOVERNING PAYNENT OF CIVIL
PENALTIES AND PROCEEDINGS TO ENFORfE PAYMENT
tOOl{ COUNTY PARKING VIOLATIONS; DEFINING TIlE
LIABILITY OF A VEHICLE'S OWNER FOR THE PAY-
~ffiNT OF P~(lNG VIOLATIONS; PROVIDING FOR THE
DISPOSITION OF FINES AND FORFEITURES; AUTHO-
RI ZING TlfE TOWING. STORAGE. AND ATTACHMENT m'
LIENS FOR HOTOR VEHICLES PARKED ON REAL
PARKING PROPERTY; PROVIDING FOR TIlE REPEAL OF
rf"'rT l'rp "","",~,..,...~? ,.,t"1"T"~"r~' -.r "1"l^",,.........,.,.. ""1'
- - ;
eoox' 053 PAGE
MQK
053 rIr.[ 295
May 20, 1980
PETITION FDPO-80-V-7, SLOCUM/HILT, REQUESTING VARIANCE FROM
THE MINIMUM BASE FLOOD ELEVATION REQUIRED BY FDPO 79-62 -
WITHDRAWN AT REQUEST OF PETITIONERS
Legal notices having been published in the Naples Daily
News on April 6, 1980 and in the Marco Island Eagle on April
1980, oS evidenced by Affidavits of Publication filed with thE
Clerk, public hearing was opened to consider Petition FDPO-JD-
filed by wi.1liam Slocum and William Hilt, requesting variance
from the Minimum Base Flood Elevation as rp.quired by FDPO 79-(
for property located on Lots 35, 36 and 37, Block l8, Amended
Plat of Collier City.
Earlier in the Session, during the Approval of trle Agend<
it was noted by County ~\anager Norman that the Petitioners
have notified the Board, by letter dated May 12, 1980, that
they are withdrawing the petition due to the fact that it is
their intent to conform with the requirements of the Corps of
EnCJin'~ering Flo0d-Proofing Regulations. Commissioner Wimer
moved, seconded by Commissioner Brown and unanimously carried,
that the request for withdrawal be accepted.
PETITIO" R-BO-4C, THm1.AS KRAUS, REQUESTING REZONING PROM "An
TO "PUD" FOR PROPERTY LOCATED IN 51, T50S, R25E - WITHDRAWN M
REQUEST OF PETITIONER; STAPP DIRECTED TO PROVIDE RECOMMENDATI<
REGARDING APPROPRIATE REZONING FOR SUBJECT PROPERTY
Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily
News on April IB, 1980 as evidenced by Affidavit of Publicatic
filed with the Clerk, public hearing was opened to consider
petition R-UO-4C, ~iled by Thomas Kraus for Theodore G. Harve}
and Fred G. Strom, r~qu~sting rezoning from "A" to "PUD" for
property located i;l Section l, Township 50 South, Range 25 Eaf
Mr. Thomas Peek, of Wilson, Miller, Barton, Soli and
Peek, Inc., represented the petitioner and, earlier in the
Session, during the Approval of the Agenda, explained that a
letter dated May 19, 1980 has been received from one of the
owners ot the property, ,t'red G. StroIn, wlthu1.<1wing the pctitic
and requesting the oppcrtunity to have the rezoning plans f.or
the property addressed during the meeting this date.
Hay 20, 1900
Mr. Peek said that several of the residents in t.l1e
arert of the subject property approached the owners asking
them to consiJer Commercial-Professional zoning of the
parcel which 5.s felt to be more compatible for that
particular location. The owners, wishing to be "good neigh-
bors", are giving serious consideration to the request and,
in addition to withdrawing the petition at this time, are
requesting t.hat the Doard consider waiving the fee when
the petition is refiled as "P-C",
Commissioner Archer moved, seconded by CommisHioner
Pistor and unanimously carried, that the Board accept the
withdrawal of Petition R-80-4-C.
Commissioner Archer inquired as to how much of the fee
submitted with the original rezoning request has been ex-
pender;, includincr an estimate of the amount of time in-
volved in proce3sing the petition. Community Development
Administrator Terry Virta said that the fee of $750.00 has
been expended at this time, adding that there has been the
usual staff involvement in the review process. He also
poin~ed out that the new zoning request will necessitate
an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan, as well as addres-
sing the rezoning. He said that he could not support iI
waiver of the refiling fee. Mr. PeeK stated that he was
not aware that the fees have been expended apd withdrew
his request for the waiver.
Mr. Tqd 8elow, representing the residents of Coconut
CreeK and himself, asked the Doard to consider changing the
Plan to either "p-e" or Residential, noting that there has
been opposition to the original proposed rezoning.
Commissioner Archer moved, seconded by Commissioner
Pistor, that the staff be directed to make a change in the
PI"n to ei ther of the two sllhjpcl: 7.(mi ng rHstricts and
come back with their recommendation.
Mr. George Keller, Golden Gate Estates resident,
"r-"" n,
p'O~K 053;:f 297
May 20, 1980
stated that it is his un~erstanding that the Comprehensive
Plan i8 not 0 zoning ordinance and, therefore, questioned
~hy a change to the Plan is necessary. Planner Lee Layne
pointed out that the Plan must be changed before any re-
zoning can be made and, if a "P_C" District is requested,
the Plan will have to be amended to Commercial and, if
residential rezoning is requested, an amendment to resi-
dential use will be necessary. Dr. Danny Crew, Planning
Direc~or, addeG the comment that there is no such zoning
category i) ,; "p-C" in the Plan - strictly "CD Commercial,
noting thol: the motion on the floor is a recommendation
for a change in zoning to either residential zoning or
IIP_cn..
Commissioner Archer clarified his motion to request
a rp.zoni ng recommendi,tion from staff, to be brought back
to the Board, in order for the rezoning to be done properly
ann follow!nq th(~ "letter of the lal.". The motion, having
bel~n stocondcd by Commissioner Fistor, ci'lrried unanimously.
There were ~everal interp.sted persons registered to
address the petiti0n but, due to its withdrawal, were not
heard. Approximately twenty letters were filed for the
record, all of which were in opposition to the rezoning
petition.
ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 78-67 TO AMEND BOUNDARIES OF
THE PELICAN BAY LIGHTING MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING DISTRICT -
ADVERTISING AUTHORIZED FOR PUBLIC HEARING JUNE l7, 1980
Commissioner wimer moved, seconded by Commissioner Brown
and unanimously carried, ".hat a proposed ordinance amending
Ordinance 70-67 to amend the boundaries of the Pelican Bay
Lighting Municipal Service Taxing District be advertised
for a public hearing June 17, 1980.
May 20, 1980
ACTION R~ TRAFFORD PINES ESTATE SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT:
BUILDING MORATORIUM FOR UNITS 1V!'1'IUN TRAFFORD PINE ESTATES
CONTINUED; COUNTY ATTORNEY DIRECTED TO USE LEGAL DISCRETION
TO SOLVE TilE PROBLEM, INCLUDING THE PREPARA'rION OF LETTEH,
["on CHAInMAN'S SICNATUHE, TO IMMOKALf.E win DISTRICT CIIAIHMAN
FOR ASSUMPTION OF FIRM'S OPERATION
Pursuant to Board directive of May 13, 1980, County
Attorney pickworth advisAd that a letter h~R been written
by his staff, dated May 14, 1980, to Mr. Roger Dick, Operator
of Trafford Pines Estate Sewage Treatment Plant, expressing
the Board's concern over the operation of the Plant and
notifying him that the matter would be addressed again by the
Board this da::e. He r,oted that the letter was sent by
Certified Mail and that a Return Receipt, signeri by him, has
been received. When asked to provide a recommendation,
Attorney pickworth said that he would advise that the Board
continue its action, taken May 13, 1980, thilt there be no
further bUllding pennits granted for the affected area.
Commissioner Archer moved, seconded by Commissioner Pistor
and unanimously carried, that the recommendation be followed.
Continuing, Attorney Pickworth recalled that the Board
has previo~sly given him authorization to do whatever is
necessary to ~c30lve the matter, including litigation which
he said might, at some point in time, becor.w necessary. He
reported that he has talked with the Tax Collector's office
and been informed that seizing the plant is under discussion;
however, Attorney Pickworth stated that he is net sure that
is r.ecessary - other properties owned by Mr. Dick can be
seized fo_ the taxes owed. He also said that it is his under-
standing that whcever seized the plant will have to operate
it and called 'JpOn Mr. Langley Adair, Enforcement Officer,
of the DER, to provide further input.
Mr. Adair said that the situation under discussion is
rather "awkward" in that it is the DER's duty to insure that
the sewage treatment plant is operating and kept operating
so that it meets the requirements for sewage treatment as
"'....,.."
b~~K U53 PAGE 299
long as anyone 1s living in houses connected to the subject
system. He noted that there have been ca8e~ in the State
where the permit-holder has wanted to stop operation of a
plant, walking off and leaving it, but that the DER has
been successful in preventing this by injunctive relief.
He explained the general conditions of a permit, once
such permit is accepted, including the particular Legula-
tion that Btates that within sixty dayo of the expir~tion
of a permit "You shall apply for a new Operating Permit".
Another regulation, said Mr. Adair, states that when the
responsibility for the operation of a plant is transferred,
either by sale or other methods, the person who assumes
control of the plant 1Jhilll apply for a transfer of the
per!:li t.
Mr. Adair explained the health hazards involved in
the levent- the plant is shut down which he said would not
only be within the DER jurisdiction but also the County
Health Department. The posture the DER would have to
take, he continued, in order to fulfill their obligations,
would be, if the plant WilS seized, for the DER to look to
the Tax Collector, or someone designated by him, to operate
the plant. Mr. Adair said that, hopefully, the matter car.
be resolved by some nther means and that the owner can
straighten out his problems and continue to operate the
plant satisfactorily.
Attorney pickworth referred to the letter from the
Farmers Home Administration which basically Gtates that, as
far as FmHA is concerned, the County has guaranteed the
operation of the facility and that the FmHA will "look to
the County". He soid that it is unfortunate that the FmHA
has allowe": the situation to exist for many years and no'''',
at the last, is looking to the County to take care of an
obligation that was partly the FmHA's problem to begin with,
especially considering the fact that the problem arose because
the immokalee Utilities, Inc. failed to live up to its agreement
May 20, 1980
with the developer. He said that the firm is a quasi-
public corporation funded by the FmHA which will be taken
over, upon construction of the sewer !lystem by the Irrmokalee
Water and Sewer District, which is also a FmHA-funded entity.
It w~s Attorney pickwo.-th's suggestion that the Soard direct
that a letter be writt"n by the Chairman to the Chairman of
the Imrnokalee Water and Sewer District requesting that they
become involved in the situation and, if necessary, take
over the operation of the plant from Mr. Dick, which was
the Immokalee Utilities' obligation upon lOa connections.
He pointed out that the County is not in a good position to
begin running a sewage treatment plant in Immokalee, com-
menting that the residents requested their own independent
district and that a bill to this effect was supported in
the Legislature. Now, he said, it is their desire to ignore
the situation, ,'.s the FmHA has chosen to do.
Commissioner Brown moved to approve the Attorney's
u.'cUI1J1\e'l1<ldLiun thaL a 10tter, as detailed above, be
drafted by hi~ for the Chairman's signature, and that the
Attorney be directed, since the problem is a legal one, to
proceed at his legal discretion to solve the problem.
Co~~issioner pistor secanded the motion which was carried
unanimously.
~\ENDMENT TO CO~~UNI'rY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROG~I
PROVIDING FOR DSMOLITION AND SUBSEQUENT NEW CONSTRUCTION OF
FIVE Ti\RKET AREA I!'lMES IN IM.'10KALEE - APPROVED
Ms. Sondra Yates, program Coordinator for the Il;lmokalee
Block Gr~nt Program, addressed the Board to request approval
of an amendment to the Community Development Block Grant
Program which would provide for replacement housing rather
than the renovation of five target area homes. She said that
the homes in question are in such a dilapidated condition as
to requiLe nlajuL bLJ:u(..Lu.ral rc-building which "-auld co::t
excess 0: $18,000 each. Since replacement housing would cost
.....-.....
BC~K U53 rAGE301
May 20, 1980
approximately $15,000 per unit, Ms. Yates said that the
Hun representative recently suggested that the proposed
amendment would b~ the most cost-effective approll.ch to
the problem and noted that the amendment would not require
~n increase in the amount of funding - merely a transfer of
funds from one category to another.
The natllre of the structural repairs required was dis-
cussed, along with Ms. Yates pointing out that the home-
owners have owned the homes for between l6 and 22 years and
that the homes represent their only resources. For the
interim periud, M!l. Yates said that there are "temporary
relocation funds" for the estimated 60 days required.
Commissioner Pistor moved, seconded by COITUllissioner
Archer, th~t the Board approve the proposed amendment to
the Community Block Grant Program, as requested.
Commissioner Wimer voiced his viewpoint that the project
presented goes heyond his original conception of the Program
and inquired if there are other programs for the purpose of
completely building new houses. Ms. Yates said that, to her
knowledge, there are none in Collier County. She said that
the proposal is within the province o~ the Program; however,
she agreed that the original intent was to repair homes and not
for replacement. She said that the only alternative is to
leave the people in the housing condition they are now in
or to replace the houses. Commissioner Wimer said that there
are other Federal programs available and that it might be
wise to pursue them for the County. Ms. Yates agreed with
the Commissioner that additional funding should be sought
so that there are other alternatives. To further explain
the problem, Ns. Yates said that the families involved
are in such condition and at such an age that living else-
where wo~ld be difficult. Also, said Ms. Yates, since some
u[ Lilt' pel SUlltl dn, 8..+ Yt'a.l"S of age, waiting until other
funding is available would not be expedient. Commissioner
May 20, 1980
Brown pointed out that even if there are other programs
thp funding is from t.axpayers I monies ultimately.
Responding to Commissiuner Wimer, Ms. Yates said that
there is l' five-year "forgiveness clause" in the Program;
i.e. the owners must retain the homes for five years and,
at the end of this time, they become an outright grant.
Upon call for the question, the motion carried 4/l
with Commissioner Wimer voting in opposition.
PETITION PU-80-4C, NAPLES BRIDGE CLUB, REQUESTING PU(6) OF
"E" DISTRICT FOR SOCIAL CLUB ON TRACT 75, UNIT 30, GOLDEN
GATE ESTA~ES - DEN:ED; STAFF DIRECTED TO PROVIDE RECOM-
ME~DATIONS F'OR POSSIBLE RE~mUNG OF SUBJECT AREA FOR USAGES
SUCH AS PROPOSED
Planning Director Danny Crew explained that Petition
PU-80-4C, filed by the Naples Bridge Club, is a request for
provisional Use (6) of the "E" Estates District for the
establishment of a bridge club on property located on the
cast 150' of Tract 75, Unit 30, Golden Gate Estates, further
described as being on the north side of Golden Gate Parkwaj,
north~Ast of the Mess~ah Lutheran Church. He said the peti-
tion has been reviewed and recommended for approval by all
County agencies, with certain stiuplations, and that the
Coastal Area Planning Commission has also reco~~ended approval
subje~t to the staff's stipulations.
The particular area, in its entirety, was discussed with
expressions of concern forthcoming with regard to the pro-
liferation of provisional uses which are eroding the residen-
tial zoning character of the roadway.
Commissioner Archer moved for denial of the petition
with the comment that the pertinent ordinance is being vio-
lated by turn~ng the district into a commercial strip. Com-
missioner Pistor seconded the motion, adding the suggestion
that a report be forthcoming from the CAPC and the Planning
Staff and that, if there is a recommendation for some type
of a change in zoning along the strip, the petition can be
presented again.
'0'" nr;~ ~I^t":m?
BO~~ 053 rACE 303
May 20, 1980
Commissioner Archer restated his motion that the
petition be denied without prejudice and, if the recommenda-
tion from the st~ff is to consider the entire area for the
suggested type of usage, and if it is subsequently approved,
the petition can be approved. Commissioner Pistor seconded
the Amended motion.
Mr. Robert Clark, President ~f the Naples Dridge
Center, Inc., voiced his appreciation of the Board's positior
and explained the urgency involved in locating a place for
the organization's activities.
Mr. William Walters, Chairman of the Coastal Area
Pla:lniJIC] Commission, explained that the petition complies
wit~ the requirements for a provisional use - it is not a
commercial operation, nor is it noisy, the hours are rela-
tivcl.y infrequent -. in shor.t, it is a perfect provis=.onal
use for the subject area, in the opinion of the CAPC.
Further, said Mr. Walters, it is his opinion that a four-
l.ane highway should not be a residential street. Mr. Cl.ark
was asked to explain the reasons why their facilities must
be relocated and also the amount of traffic that will be
generated.
Mr. William 11cGrath, CAPC member, added his comments
to Mr. Walters' with regard to the recommendation which was
forthcoming from that ent~ty. He said that to try to pre-
serve Golden Gat~ Parkway as a residential area is unrealis-
tic; therefore, he said that public service operations ouch
as churches, and the like, are not too bad for the area and
should be continued as provisional uses. He said that the
traffic problems can be analyzed and maybe resolved by the
use of another access road, concluding with the comment that
the CAPC is very much in favor of permitting the use being
requeoted.
Commissioner Pistor voiced his agreement with Mr.
McGrath with the suggestion that ~he area be rezoned in such
May 20, 1980
a way that previsional use petitions will not have to be
continually addressed, such ~oning to specify what can and
cannot be considered appropriate uses.
Upon call for the question, the motion carried 4/1
with Commissioner Brown voting in opposition.
Chairman Wenzel instructed the staff to review the
area in question for possible zoning change. County Manager
advised l:h,~t it ah0uld be recognized that to rezone the
pl'Qperties will take more than the usual time because of the
controversial nature along Golden Gate Parkway.
C~NERAL POLICIES AND PROCEDURES CONCERNING FEES OF AND
SF.RVICES RENDERED BY THE COLLIER COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT _
APPROVED
Dr. \Hlliam i'i. Cox, Collier County llealth Director,
addr0ssed the Board for the purpose of requesting approval
of the Fce Schedules submitted, as attached to his Memoran-
dum dated May 7, 1980, and entitled General Policies and
Procedures Concerning Fees of the Collier County Health
Depart:.ment. He said that th~ present schedule is obsolete
and inatlequate, pointing out that the fee schedule for the
Environmental Health Section was approved by the Board in
1975.
Responding to Chairman \'lenzel, Dr. Cox said that
there will te no hardships with regard to the County having
to pick up some of the charges through welfare, and ':he like,
noting that one phase ':If the Schedule is a req'lest for the
authority to use discretionary judgement regarding fees in
unusual or hardship cases.
Commissioner Wimer moved for approval of the document
presented by Dr. Cox. The motion was seconded by Commissioner
Brown.
Fo:lowing brief comment regarding septic tank fees,
Chairman Wenzel called for the question with the motion
carrying unanimously.
abnx 053 PACE 304
Jnx 053 PAC; 31j
May 20, 1980
RECOMMENDED CIIANGr,S IN ADMINISTR1\TION AND ACCOUNTING OP
rUEL COSTS l\ND SUPPLIES - CONTINUED UNTIL MAY 27, 19BO
Purchasing Director r. Il. Wilcox reported that,
pUrf'lUilnt to BOllrd directivr> of April 29, 1980, the details
for the administration and accounting of fuel costs and
supplies have been worked out. With regard to tl,e proposed
surcharge, Mr. wilcox said that, since fuel dispension is
an internal service, it lH felt that any expenditures
related to this service should be charged out to the users
01' the service, commentin'} that a 2C per gallon surcharge is
beinC] proposed. These monies would be deposited in a separate
reserve account in the Internal Services Fund for deprecia-
tion and maintenance, concluded Mr. Wilcox.
l\ further proposal, said Mr. Wilcox, is that the
r~sponsibility for all maintenance, operations, record-
keepinC] and fuel allocation for all facilities under the
jurisdiction of the Board be consolidated and assigned to
one department - that bein'l the Motor Pool. He noted
that this consolidation i~ most essential when gas short-
ages occur and fuel allocations are necessary.
Commissioner Pistor moved, seconded by Commissjoner
Wimer, that the recommendations outlined by Mr. Wilcox be
approved.
Deputy Ch~ef Raymond Barnett voiced his opposition
to the proposed 3urcharge, suggesting that 2C per gallon
is extremely ~igh. Mr. Wilcox said that if the Sheriff's
Department was to build its own facility it would cost
between $60,000 and $10,000 per facility, whereas, under
the propo"i11., i.t would cos~. the Department only an additional
$3,000 per year approximately. Deputy Barnett also pointed
out that the County's facilities are not built so that a
determination can be made as to how much fuel is used in
Pilch C'lr. County Mflnilger Norman said thi'lt it is envisioned
that one of the items that the subject funds would be used
May 20, 1980
is the installation of an automated dispensing system in
the future whereby rCRd-out9 could be obtained.
Noting that there appeared to be some differences of
',pinion, and the like, Commissioner Wimer withdrew his
""conding of the motion witn the comment that the staff
should "sit down and wo.k out" the differences - at least
try to do so - before the matter is brought to the Board.
Having made the original motion, Commissioner Pistor
withdrew the subject motion.
It was moveJ by Commissioner Wimer, seconded by
commissioner pistor and unanimously c<'\rried, that the
subject matter be continued until May 27, 1980.
ufD #417 FOR PAVING AND DRAINAGE OF PARKERS HAMMOCK -
!,'.,,\RDED TO llIGllWA Y PAVERS, INC., NAPLES, FLORIDA, IN THE
:-;\1>1 OF' $87, ,52.75
t.cqal notice having been published in the Naples Daily
I;c\...s on April 16 and 18, 1980 as evidenced by Affidavit of
['u<-)lic<ltion filed with the Clerk, bids were received until
~\,IY 7,1960 with regard to Bid #417 for the paving and
c],ainage of Pa,kers Hammock.
Commissioner Archer moved, seconded by Commissioner
Plstor and unanimously carried, that Bid #417 be awarded to
Highway Pavers, Jnc., Naples, Florida, in the amount of
S87,752.75, the low bidder, as r2commended in the Executive
Surrmary cl,) ted May 9, 1980, as prepared by the Purchasing
Director and approved by the County Manager; and, that the
Chairman and the Clerk be authorized to sign and attest
tte resulting Agreement.
Ri;COMMENDATION TO WAIVE BID PROCESS AND AUTHORIZE PURCHASE
OF SPRINKLER AND SOD FOR THE MARCO ISLAND BALL FIELD -
~ONTINUED UNTIL MAY 27, 1980
Purchasing Director Frank Wilcox reviewed briefly the
Executive Summary dated ~ay 8, 1980, as prepared by him and
approved by the County Manager, wherein it is requested that
the bid process be waived and for the Board to authorize the
BO~K 053 pm 315
May 20, 1980
purchase of 80,000 Aqu~re fe~t of Bermuda '419 Turf, and
fifty-four (54) sprinkler heads for use at the new ball
field loc'lted on Marco Island. He said that, because of
the simpli flcation of the specifications, written quota-
tions were requested from potential suppliers in lieu of
using the s~aled bid process and noted that a tabulation
of the quotations is attached to the Executive Summary.
Mr. wilcox said that the Parks and Recreation Departm~nt
staff has expressed a preference for purchasing the sprink-
ler heads from the local vendor, D.lthough not the lowest
bidder, in consid~ration of the co~~ribution the dealer
has I"ade by his help and assistance in preparing the
blueprint: and design for the system, plus the fact that
he has offered his services and tim~ to the Department
personnel during Lhe installation of the system by the
County staff.
Commiss.i.oncr Wimer, noting the absence of figures
showing the costs involved in laying the sod and instal-
ling the sprinklers, moved that the matter be continued
until MClY 27, 1980 at I'hich time figures should be, fur-
nished upon which an intelligent decision can be made. The
motion was seconded by Commissioner Archer and unanimously
carried.
CONSTRUCTION BIDS FOR WILLOUGHBY ACRES WATER AND SEWER
IMPROVEMENTS - AWARDED TO MITCHELL & STARK CONSTRUCTION
COMPANY, INC., MFnORA, INDIANA; WATER LINES TO BE INSTALLED
AS QUICKLY AS POSSIBLE
Legal notices having been published in the Naples
Daily News on April 15, 1980, in The Fort Myers News-Press
on April 16, 1980, and in The Tampa Tribune on April 18,
1980 as evidenced by Affidavits of Publication filed with
the Clerk, bids were received antil May 9, 1980 with regard
to the construction of the Willoughby Acres Water and Sewer
Improvements.
May 20, 1980
Utilities Division Director Irving Berzon said that
the bidg w~r~ tabulated by the Consulting Engineer and
"came in" within the revised esti~ates that were prepared.
lie said that, after the Consultant has provided th(~ Board
with his recommendation as to the materials and the con-
tractor, it ig hin (Mr. Berzon's) rocommendation that
the Eng i neer' S recolnmenda tions be accepted and that the
Chairman be authorized to sign the contracts on behalf
of the County Water-Sewer District with the apparent low
hidder. Also, said Mr. Berzon, it should be stipulated
that the authorization is contingent upon approval of the
bids hy the Farmers Home Administration and an increas~ in
the amount of the loan by the FmHA to meet the financial
needs of the project.
Mr, Thoma~ Peek, of Wilson, Miller, Barton, SolI &
Peek, Inc., Consulting Engineers for the project, said
that seven bids were received f~r the project with bids
ranging from $1,360,000 to $1,900,000 - two bids being
within $2,000 of each other. Mr. Peek said that a com-
parison of the prices submitted by the two low bidders,
together wi th an analysis and rE!c:ommendation, have been
furnished to Nr. Berzon, same being attached to the
Memorandum dated May 19, 1980 prepared by Mr. Berzon. He
revieweG briefly the contents of the attac~nents including
the ~lalifications of the apparent low bidders and his
.Mr. Peek's) recommendation with regard to the use of
PVC in lieu of Asbestos Cement Pipe for the water line
construction.
When asked by Commissioner Wimer when the water line
could be installed, Mr. Peek responded by stating that the
bid specified 365 days at the outside. It is anticipated
that the project will take no more than 300 days to complete:
however, it must be recognized that the paper work must be
Max 053 PACE 318
~o~~ 053. pm317
M'\y 20, 1980
pr.ocessed and that it will probably be early in July
before the contractor can proceed which" Mr. Peek pointed
out, is ~~ the bey~nning of the r~iny season. Commissioner
Wimer observed that ~his presents a problem since the resi-
dents were desirous of obtaining the water, which is the
only thing requested in the first place, and that the
sewer has consistently caused delays. He said it was
their understonding that the water could be installed in
a few months, with the sewer system continued for the estim-
ated time of approximately a year. Mr. Peek said that the
recommended contractor has indicated that it is his desire
to complete the job with the least amount of disturbance,
noting that he would like to work both system~ together,
and that, if the water system can be completed sooner than
the sewer, the contractor would probably work toward that
goal; however, he is not making such commitment.
During the ensuing discussio~, such matters as the
reasons for bidding the projects separately were discussed,
along ,..>ith t.he roctO restoration work involved, and other
pertinent factors. Since both lines will not be installed
on the same side of the street, it was suggested by Commis-
sion~r pistor that perhaps the w~ter lines will go in
quickzr than the sewer lines and, if necessary, the con-
tractor could be requested to give priority to the water
lines.
Commissioner Wimer moved, seconded by Commissioner Archer
and unaoimously carried, that the staff recommendation be
accepted; i.e. that the Construction Bids for the Willoughby
Acres Water and Sewer Improvements be awarded to Mitchell
& Stark Construction Company, Inc., Medora, Indiana, in the
amount of $1,JIl,15l.06, using PVC pipe for both systems;
that the Chairman be authorized to sign the contracts on
behalf of the County Water-Sewer District: that it be
May 20, 1980
stipulated that the authorizatipn is contingent upon
approvnl of the b1dR hy the FArm~rB Home ~dministration
and an increase in the amount of the loan by the FmHA to
meet the financial needs of the project; and that the
concern be expressed that the Board would like the water
line to be installed as quickly as possible.
RII;TINE BILLS - AUTHORIZED FOR PAYMENT
Commissioner Archer moved, seconded by Commissioner
Pistor, that the bills, having been processed according
to established procedure with funds available, he ap-
proved fo= payment as witnessed by the following checks
issued from May 14, 1980 through May 20, 1~80:
ACCOUNT
CHECK NOS.
7951 - ('203
7
1864 - 2007
County Checks
General Fund
BeC Payroll - CETA
The motion car=ied unanimously for all bills with
th~ exception of Check No. 8052 for Vines and Associates
with Chairman Wenzel voting in opposition to the payment
of l:his bill.
*
*
*
*
*
* * *
* *
*
M~K n!i~ "IO~~" Q
BD~K 053 PACZ '3J 9
May 20, 1980
BUDGET A!olENDMEN'r 80-107 RE TRANSFER I"ROM CONTINGENCIES TO
COVER COST 01" CONVERSION OF AMBULANCE UNIT (AMBlJLANCE
SERVICES) - ADOPTED IN TIlE AMOUllT OF $3/030
Commissioner Archer moved, seconded by COmmiS6..l0ner
Pifitor and carried unanimously, that Budget Amendment 80-107,
as follows, be adopted:
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
BUD GET
A MEN D MEN T
C~ Requ~-es Board Ap?=oval
- D DO'e's' Not Require Board Approvi'.l
(transf:er within object code range)
nlND
GENEAAL . _
AMBULANCE SERVICES
DEPT .-
)I':SCRlr"l'ICN:
Tr_lI:..i . UC iL:nJ:.; [I:om' C01ltiJlgencies to cover c:)st of convert:
th~ modular ambulance unit previously leased to Zippo Ambulance
Service.
PREVIOUSLY APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSI9NERS 5/6/80.
TO (Increase):
M0tor Vehicles
001-526-1-13-40-010-640
S 3,039.
FROM !Source of Funds);
Contingencies
001-519-l-00-05-0l0-990
S 3,03C
'.
..
::oun ty !>lgr jDi v
'fitma
~,,~~: ~-I2-So
~~;~~~f}YJ:;1
Dateifr/1
Boord of County Comm.
A:?proval:
BUDGET J
Date~ May 20, .1980
No.80-lC
DTST!'-.!!lUTION=_ - 'D Board Hecorcls (Original)
D Fiscal Officer -
L:7 Department(s) Affected
- -17 lIccounting Department
2:7 purchasing (Equipment Only)
;-? Budget Analyst
May 20, 1900
BUDGET AMENDMENT 80-108 RE TRANSFER FROM CONTINGENCIES TO
~OVER COST OF INSTALLATION OF FUEL PUMPING STATION AND
EXPANSION OF TANKS AND PUMPS (INTERNAL SERVICES-MOTOR POOL)
ADOPTED IN TilE AMOUNT OF $38,750
Commissioner Archer moved, seconded by Commissioner
Pistor and unanimously Curried, that Budget Am~ndment 80-108
as follows, be adopted:
BOARD OF' C:)UN'tY COHMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
BUD GET
A MEN D MEN T
~7 RequLre~ Board Approval
. D Do'es' Not Require Board 1\pprova
(transfer within object code ra
. .. .' .' .... .
., .. .,. ..... .
FllNU
-';
C I? - O'I'HER :rll.Al~ f,.OADS.
.' DEPT.:
.
INTERNAL SERVICES
.MOTOR .POOL '
DESCRIPTTOCl:
Transfer of fniids from Contingencies to Improvements Other
than Buildings for the Installation of a fuel pumping station
on Marco Island (Project NO.'lOOOl); and the expansion of
tanks and .pumps at Naples Darn (prrject No. 10002) and the
Immok~lee Barn (Project No. 10003).
PREVIGt;SLY APPROVSD BY THE BOARD OF -COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 4/29/ B(
TO (Increase):
Improvements Other than Bldgs.
Improvements Other t...'1an Bldgs.
Improvements Ot...~e~ than Bldgs.
303-519~l-OO-99-610-6)0-1000
303_519-l-00-99-0l0-630-l000
303_5l9_l_00_99_0l0_630_100C
Tota 1
FROM (Source of Funds~:
con<::ingencies
303-5l9-l-00-05-0l0-990
Fiscal O~,fice
APpro'fJf Kr
D"l".(>:f/~.-/~ ....r
I Board of County CO:llm.
Approval:
DI
Date: May 20" 1980 .
Nl
O:rST)UBUTrON: . ./7 DOilrd Reco:ds (Origin"'J.)
P",rcJ.co.J'"",",,' ) r7 Fiscal. of!:1.cer
f..M.c'LJ"rlc.r -U DePitJ::tmen~fected
'il.. J\ccounting Department
D purchasing (Equip;n"nt 01\
;-? Buuget Analyst
"""_....".
lK 053 freE 321
May 20, 1980
BUDGET AMENDMENT 80-109 RE TRANSFER FROM RESERVE FOR
VEHICLE PARTS AND PAINT (OCHOPEE FIRF. CONTROL) - ADOPTED
IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,000
CommissJoncr ~rcher moved, seconded by Commissioner
pistor and unanimously carried, that Budget Amendment 80-l09,
as follows, be adopted:
BOARD OF COUNTY CO~~ISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
BUD GET
A MEN D MEN T
3' Requires Board Approval
, D Do"e"s. Not Require Bo~rd Approval
(transfer within object code range)
"UNO C. .c. F];iU) -I;:ONTROL DISTRICTS
DEPT.:9CH~P~~,~~RE CON1'RO~
'ESCRIPTION:
-,
Transfe~ of funds from Reserve for Future Expenditures to
Mi~cellaneous Supplies o~Materials for vehicle maintenance parts
and paint for two cars and two trucks.
'l'u (Increase):
Misc. Supplies or Materials
12l-522-1-l3-28-040-529 .$ 2,OOC
FROM . (SoQr.ce uf Funes):
ReserEe - Future Expenditures
l21-522-i-l3-28-040-648 -'$ 2,00C
ollnty ~19rl
pfi'[J):
'ate: 6
Fiscal o-:=,-Jlicer
APpro;aj!pft~
oate)I5//l{-- ru
Board of County Co~m.
J\pproval:
BUDGET,
Date:
~ay 20,l980
No. 80-1
lISTRIBUTION: . -il Boitre) Records (Original)
L:7 Fiscal Officer
2:7 De~rement{s) Affected
. .n 1\ccounting Department
z=7 purchasing (Equi~~ent Only)
L:7 Budget Analyst
May 20, 1980
RUDGET AMENDMENT 80-1l0 TO TRANSFER FROM GOLDEN GATE CON-
TINGENCIES FOR REPLACEMENT OF WATER TANK AND ADDITIONAL
TRAVEL FOR NEW EMPLOYEE (GOLDEN GATE FIRE CONTROL) -
ADOPTED IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,38l
Commissioner Archer moved, seconded by Commissioner
pistOl: lInd lIni1nimously carried, that Budget Amendment
SO-lID, as follows, be adopted:
DOARD OF COUNTY CONMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
BUD GET
~l Re<.l ui.re 5 Doa rd J\pprova 1
AMEtlDt1ENT
, D Do'lo!'g' Not Require Doard Approval
(transfer within object code range)
. .... ........ ...........
'UND ::~:.... FI.RE. CONTROL DISTRICTS
. DEPT.: . ~~,o~!'i. ~!,-TE FIRE CONTROL
ESCRIP't'ION:
Transfer of funds from/Contingencies to replace water tank
on fire truck; and to cover cost of additional travel costs
to send new em?loyee to certification school in Ft. Myers.
TO (Increase):
OllL of County Travel
Other ~ach & Equi?I:lent
121-522-l-13-28-030-402
121-522-l-l3-2B-030-643
$ 600
781
Total
$1381,.
FROM (Source of Funds) :
Contingencies
l2l-522-l-l3~2B-030-990
$1381
Fiscal o~tfce
Appr~vf) Nt
DatPJ; /r
DISTlunUTlON, . "B Board Reco:dS (Original)
Fiscal oftl.cer
DepartmentCs) Affected
IBoard of County Co~m.
J\pE>roval:
InUDGET I
Date:~ay 20, 1980
1'10.80-11
" .n J\ccount.ing Department
D Purchasing (Equipment Only)
L:7 Budget Analyst
,...,;,? " 717<\"
nr.::n
""1')1)
BOOK 053 PAGE 323
May 20, 1980
BUDGET AMENDMENT 80-11l TO APPROPRIATE GRANT RECEIPTS AND
TO PROVIDE EXPENDITURE LINE IT~.S RELATED TO FEDERAL FUNDING
(SOCIAL SERVICES-HOMEMAKERS) - ADOPTED IN THE AMOUNT OF
$13,827
Comminnioncr pintor moved, seconded by commissioner
Archer and carried unanimously, that Budget Amendment
80-111, as follows, be adopted:
BO~~ OF COUNTY CO~~ISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
BUD GET
A MEN D MEN T
;g
Hegu.i.=-e.s Board Approval
. D Do"e's' Not Require Board Approval
(transfer within object code range
FUND GENERM.
-----
DEPT.' _: SOC~AL"?ERVICES-HOMEMAKEF
DESCRIPTlmJ:
. To aPl-'ropr ia t"e grant receipts to the proper revenue code and
to:provide (or correspondinq expenditures related to the additior
Federal funcl[; i'lwardcd in F~bruary, 1980.
TO (Increase):
Regular Salaries
social Security Matching
Retirement Contributions
Life & Health Insurance
Worker's Compensation
Private Veh. Reim!J.
001-564-1-14-80-030-120
001-564-1-14-80-030-210
00l-564-l-14-80-030-220
OOI-564-l-14-80-030-230
001-564-1-14-80-030-240
001-564-l-14-80-030-40l
$
9,250
569
842
1,280
I,OR5
801
Total
$ 13,827
ADD TO Rc.-vENUE:
Grants-Homemakers (Fed)
OOI-l-14-80-030-331.670
$ 13,827
Coun ly 1~1?i~/Oil r j'" Oi r.
l\ff?W~
~_,"\tc: c:;-, L-&o
Fiscal Officfr Board of County Comm.
^p~r11Jl ~ Approval:
DatJr;r~...../ '1,p Date: Xay 20,.1980 .
BUDGET
No.BO-I:
nrSTRIBUTIC'N: " '0 noanl Records (Original)
L:7 Fiscal Officer
L:7 Departmen~(s) Affected
. 'g Accounting Deparl.ment:
Purchasing (Dquiprn~nt Only)
L:7 Budget Analyst:
, \ '"\. '",:1'"
, '" "'- . . :. "
"'
----...:...' --.,..-.....-,--......
May 20, 1980
BUDGET AMENDMENT 80-112 RE TRANSFER FROM CONTINGENCIES TO
CREATE I,INE ITEM BUDGF.T FOR NEW PROGPAM IN COlJNTY COUR'rS
AREA (~LCOHOL INFORMATION CLASSF.S) - ADOPTED IN THE AMOUNT
OF $300
COlTunissioner Archer mO-/ed, seconded by Commissioner
Pistor ond carried unanimously, that Budget Amendment
80-112, as follows, be adopted:
DOARD OF COUNTY CO~~ISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
BUD GET
A MEN D MEN T
/i;jf Requires Board Approval
, D poe's' Not Requiro Board Approval
(transf.er within object code ran
FUND
'GENERAL,
DEPT.: ,ALCOUOL.INFORMATION CLAS
DESCRIPTrml:
To create a line item b~dget for a new pro~ram to be entitle
Alcohol Information Classes in the County Courts area in an amou
which will be co~?letely off-set by revenue.
,;
TO (Increase):
Other Contractual Se=-ices
OOI-5l6-3-00-22-040-349
~_ 300
FROM (Source of F~ds) :
Con tingencie s
OOl-Sl9-1-qO-OS-OlO-990
$ 300
=
DClte:
Board of County Comm. BUDGE
Approval:
County Mgr/Div. Dir.
Approval:
1'.1 It
Date: May 20 ~ 1980 , No.80
DISTRIBUTION: ' 'D Board Records {Griginal)
L:7 Fiscal Officer
D Departlnent{s) Affected
. .n 1\ccounting Dcp.u:bnent,
2::7 purchasing (Equipment Only)
L:7 Budget Analyst
. 1
~ -,".. .~.;,~." -"~~
" R~v ..1.2/.\.7.1
BO~K U53 PAGE 325
May 20, 1980
BUDGET AMENDMENT 80-113 RE TRANSFER FROM CONTINGENCIES TO
COVER COST OF RADIO TOWER RENTAL (AMBULANCE SERVICE) -
ADOPTED IN THE AMOUNT OF $465
Commisr,ion~~ Wimer moved, seconded by Commissioner
Archer and unanimously carried, that Budget Amendment
80-113, ns follows, be adopted:
BOARD OF COUNTY CO:1MISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
BUD GET
A MEN D MEN T
L:r Req~ires Board Approval
," D Do"e's' Not Require BO<i.rd Approval
(transf.er within object code rang.
FUND
GENERAL:
. DEPT.: . : : ll.MBULANcE SERVICE.
DESCRIPTIO>l:
Transfer of funds from Contingencies to Rentals - Non-equipmen
, to cover cost of ra~io tower rental.
TO (Increase):
Rentnls & Leases - Non Equip.
00J-526-1-l3-40-010-440
$ 46,
FROM (Source of Funds):
Contingencies
001-S19fl-00-0S-010-990
$ 46:
Board of County Co~m. n~DGET
Approval:
filf~tlf/I:P;~ .
~ /:-/.r-~
Date: May 20, 1980" No.80-J
DISTRIBUTION, ' '0 Bob.-cc1 Reco-cds (Original)
;-T Fiscal Officer
L:7 Dep~rtmentCs) Affected
, ';'1 "-, ,:.7, .~-
}. 1;.., :.',
. ';-7 ~ccountiny Depnrtm~nt
"L7 Purchasing CEquip;nent. Only)
;-? Bud~et Analyst
---- ~_. -
-. .\.
\- I r
R.!"'_:P0.21.L<J
May 20, 1980
BCC APPROVES SELECTION OF FISCHER, JOHNSON, ALLEN & DURKE/
SOUTHEASTfRN MUNICIPAL BONDS, INC. AS FINANCIAL CONSULTANTS
FOR ROAD CONSTRUCTION BOND ISSUE PLEDGING THE 9TH-CENT GAS
TAX
FIscal Of f leer Harold L. Ifall noted thl\t information
has been received by the Board from Leedy, Wheeler and
^lleman setting forth their proposal for serving as Financial
Consultants for the Road Construction Bond Issue pledging
the 9th-Cent Gasoline Tax, together with the information
submitted by ~IL Fischer, of Fischer, Johnson, Allen &
Burke for joint proposal with Southeastern Municipal Bonds,
Inc. He said that both firms offer the same service, the
latter firm presently pe,fnrmi~g work for the Board. The
first-named fi:-:n, said Mr. Hall, has not done any work for
the Board; however, he said that the Orlando-based firm
has mOB t recenUy completed a bond issue pledging gas tax
revenues. Mr. Hall noted that a proposal was also received
from Il. G. Nix, Ilillsborough CO\lnty, presently working on a
"ilS tax bond Issue for that county. It was pointed out by
Mr. Hall that Fischer, Johnson, Allen & Burke, et aI, was
not originally listed because there was no information on
th~~ having wo~ked on this type of issue recently; however,
at the request of the Commission, the firm was contacted and
they state~ that they would like to submit a proposal, which
has been provided to the Board.
Comnissioner Wimer moved, seconded by Commissioner Brown,
and unanimously carried, that the firm of Fischer, JOhnson,
Allen & Burke, and Southeastern Municipal.Bonds, Inc. be ap-
pointed to serve as Financial Consultants on the Road Con-
struction Bond Issue pledging the 9th-Cent Gasoline Tax.
Commissioner Wimer noted his satisfaction with the firm's
per formance.
BODK 053 PAGE 326
053 PACE327
May 20, 1980
CHAIRMAN AU'rHOIU7.ED TO SIGN CERTIFICATES FOR CORRECTION TO
TilE 1979 TAX ROLLS
Commissioner Arch0;:" r:1oved, Reconded by Commissioner
pintor nnrl unnnimously carried, thl1t the Chl1irman be
"uthorized to siqn the following Corrections to the Tax
Rolls:
NOS.
DATED
1979 Tax Roll
555
557-56l
38G
389
396
4/2/80
5/5-5/13/80
2/15/80
2/15/80
2/20/80
Intangible Personal
Property
1979-192
5/l6/80
TAX COLLECTOR 1,UT~IOHI ZED TO ISSUE DUPLICATE OF TAX SALE
CERTI1"ICA7E 660 1"1<011 1974 SALE TO HAROLD FEENEY
Comml.!,sioner Archer moved, seconded by Commissioner
l'istor and unanimously carried, that the Tax Collector
be authorized to issue a duplicate of Tax Sale Certificate
660 from the 1974 Sale to Harold Feeney, original Certifi-
cilte having been lost or destroyed
.*
.*
.*
.*
.*
.*
.*
.* .* *
.* *
.*
*. .*
.*
BO~~ 053 rm329
May 20, 1980
BCC AUTHORIZES PURCHASE OF 20 ADDITIONAL VOTOMATIC VOTING
MACHINES PURSUANT TO REQUEST BY SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS;
APPROPRIATE BUDGET AMENDMENT TO BE PREPARED
Commissioner Brown muved, seconded by Commissioner
Wlm0r: 11I1L: _nanimously carried, that authorization be given
for the p\Jrchils'~ of 20 additional Votomatic Voting Machinell,
as requested by the Supervisor of Elections in her request
to the Board dated May 12, 1980, with an appropriate Budget
Amendment to be forthcoming.
REQUEST FOR ADOPTION OF MORATORIUM ON BUILDING PERMITS
FOR BOAT DOCKS PLANNED FOR VANDERBILT T~GOON - NO ACTION
TAKEN PENDING STAPF REPORT ON MAY 27, 1980
It was brought to the Board's attention by their
Administrative Aide Mary Morgan that an additional copy
of their April I, 1980 letter has been received from
the Vanderbilt Beach Property Owner's Association re-
quesL'..nq a moratorium on buildi.:--.c; permits in the County
for non-conforming boat docks. She said that the original
letter WetS referred to the Planning De)?artment for staff
revie.... of the matter on April 8, 1980. Corrunlssioner Wimer
said that he has been "taken to task" for not bringing the
subject up before this, expressing his apology for not
doing so.
He noted that the President of the Association
was in attendance to offer comment.
Mr. Carl Gilzow, President of the Vanderbilt Beach
Property Owner's Association, explained that the purpose
of the request for holding building permits for dock con-
struction was to perrni~ sufficient time for the pertinent
ordinance to be revised and ~ut into effect. He pointed out
that the County has done much to control the density of pop_
ulation in the area but that nothing has been done to con-
trol the density of boats, gradually turning what is a
limited space -. a small waterway - into a large parking lot
for boats by extending. the docks and permitting large num-
bers of docks. Essentially, said Mr. Gilzow, the Association
is asking that the density of the boat population be con-
trolled.
May 20, 1980
Com~issioner Wimer said that he was unsure as to the
statu,,; of the stdff's investigative report aL this time;
however, he suggested that the work on the report be com-
pletcd an quickly as possible. Conununity Development
Administrator Terry Virta explained that there is a draft
ordinance before the Coastal Area Planning Commission
which will be discussed at their June 3, 1980 meeting. lIe
said that it probably will not come before the Board until
after the Doard reconvenes following the July rece3S.
h'hcn asked :JY Chairman Wenzel whether or not he would recom-
mend a moratorium, Mr. Virta stated that he was not in a
position to know the legal ramifications of such a decision.
Commissioner Wimer moved, seconded by Commissioner
Archer and unanimously carried, that Mr. Virta review all
aspects of the matter and report back to the Board on
~lilY 27, 1980.
REQUEST FOR REPP.ESENTATION ON CAPC FROM COMMISSION DISTRICT 5 _
NO ACTION TAKEN PENDING DISCUSSION OF THE POLICY WITll REGARD
TO ADVISORY BOARDS AND APPOINTMENTS TO TAKE PLACE DURING WORK-
SHOP SESSIml THIS DA'l'E
Administrative Aide to the Board Mary Morgan noted the
receipt of a letter dated May 15, 1980 from Joyce Hancotte
expressing concern that the eastern part of Golden Gate
Estates, since it was changed from t.he IAPC to the CAPC, has
no representation on the Planning Commission and volunteered
to serve as the representative for that area which is located
in Commission District 5.
No action was taken at this time due to the fact
that a discussion of Advisory Boards and Appointments is
scheduled on the agenda for the Board's Workshop Session
to be held this date, as pointed out by Chairman Wenzel.
CHAIRMAN AUTlIORIZED TO SIGN LETTER OF OPPOSITION TO HB-1298
AND SB-I030 RE PUBLIC HEALTH FOR SUBMITTAL TO LEGISLATIVE
DELEGATION
Commissioner Archer moved, seconded by Commissioner
Max 053 P,\GE '331
May 20, 1980
Pistor and unanimously carried, that the Chairman be
authorized to sign a letter of opposition to proposed
legislation with regard to Public Health (HB-1298 and
SB-I030) for submittal to the Legislative Delegation,
said proposed bills having been reviewed in the emergency
m~mo dated May 6, 1980 from John P. Thomas, Executive
Director (,f SACCo
CHAIRMAN AUTHORIZED TO SIGN LETTER OF OPPOSITION TO
58-505 (TRIM BILL) FOR SUBMITTAL TO LEGISLATIVE DELEGATION
Commissioner Archer moved, seconded by Commissioner
Pistor and unanimously carried, that the Chairmar. be
authorized to sign a letter of opposition to proposed
le<)islatiGr. Hit)) re<)ard to thc spending cap to be levied
by local governmcnt (SB-505 Trim Bill), as suggested in
the memorandum dated May 9, 1980 from Frank B. Smith, Jr.,
Secretary-Trcasurer, SACCo
CHAIRMAN TlUTHORIZED TO SIGN LET'fER TO LEGISLATIVE DELEGATION
URGING ADOPTfON OF LEGISLATION LIMITING THE STATE BUDGET TO
NO ~!ORF: TIU\N 1\ 5% INCREASE OVER LAST YEAR'S EXPENDITURES
Commis s ioner l.rcher moved, seconded by Commissioner
Pis tor and unanimously carr::'ed, that the Chairman he
authorized to sign a letter to the Legislative Delegation
urging the adoption of a measure which would limit the
State Budget to no more than a 5% increase over last
year's expenditures, as suyge~ted in the letter dated
May 9, 1980 from County Attorney Devitt J. Adams, for the
Board of County Commissioners, St. Lucie County, Florida.
REQUEST FOR PLACL'IENT OF MOBILE HOME ON GOLDEN GATE ESTATES
PROPERTY TEMPORARILY WHILE CONSTRUCTING HOME - REFERRED TO
STAFF FOR CONSIDERATION FOLLOWING COMPLETION OF REDRAFTING
OF PERTINENT ORDINANCE
Administrative Aidc to the Board Mary Morgan advised
that a request has been received from Jean A. Whipple,
dated May 9, 1980, reque~ting that a hearing be scheduled
for consideration of pennitting a mobile home to be placed
May 20, 1980
te~porarily on her property on Golden Gate Boulevard
while her rcnidence is being constructed.
Corrur.unity Development Administrator Terry Virta
c^plained that an amendment to the pertinent ordinance has
been draft~d which would allow for the temporary use of
travel trailers, and the like, in the Estates; however,
he said that the ordinance has yet to be advertised for
public hearings by the CAPC and the DOdrd.
Commissioner Archer moved, that the request be turned
over to the staff to be brought back to the Board at the
completion of the redrafting of the subject ordinance. The
motion was seconded by Commissioner Wimer and unanimously
carried.
COUNTY ATTORNEY INSTRUCTED '1'0 DRAFT PROPER RESOLUTION
~~POWERING THE DOARD TO APPOINT A CHARTER COMMISSION
CHARGED \-IIT!I DRAFTING A PROPOSED CHARTER SPECIFICALLY
GOVERNING 'HIE BCC
Commissioner Wimer reviewed briefly his memorandum
to the Boarc dat.ed May 19, 1980 regarding "A Different
Charter for Collier County", following which he moved
that the County At~orney be instructed to draft the
proper resolution, as required by State law, to be
brought back for Bec consideration, as a regular scheduled
agenda item. He said that such resolution would empower
the Board to appoint a Charter Commission which would be
charged with drafting a proposed Charter specifically
governing the Board of County Commissioners. Commissioner
Brown seconded the motion.
Chairman Wenzel said that he has advised the various
citizens' groups which have approached him on the subject
to make such request on their official letterhead, expres-
sing his preference to wait until such letters have been
received before takin~ any action.
Upon call for the question the motion carried 4/1 with
Chairman Wenzel voting in opposition.
nr::n
'<"l,",~
Mn~ 053 rm333
May 20, 1980
commissioner Archer moved that resumes be submitted
by persons interested in serving on such Committee as
soon as possiblc. The motion was seconded by Cornmis-
sioner Wimer and carried unanimously.
CII^JHM^N MJTHOHIZED TO SIGN CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE
OF BURGLARY ENFORCEMENT GRANT #80-AA-09-CGOS SUBMITTED BY
TIlE SHERIFF' 5 DEPARTMENT
commissioncr Archer moved, seconded by Commissioner
pistor and unanimously carried, that the Chairman be
authorized to sign ~he Certificate of Acceptance of Burglary
Enforcement Grant #80-AA-09-CG05 submitted by the Sheriff's
Depar tmen t.
HISCELLANEOUS CORRESPONDENCE - FILED AND/OR REFERRED
There being no objection, the Chair directed that the
following co~respondence be filed and/or referred to the
respective deparLments as indicated:
1. Memorandum dated 5/12/80 from William D.
Cox, M.D., Health Department, transmitting
the monitoring report, Naples Bay Study,
Fehruary, 1980 - xc Utility, Engineering,
County Manager; and filed.
2. Memorandum dated 5/15/80 from Chairman
Wenzel regarding recent news article that
indicated problems re smoking outside of
the Boardroom dnd temperature control in
the Complex, and qUestioning the enforcement
of County ordinances re same - Filed.
3. ~10110randllm dated 5/9/80 from Area Agency
on Aging noting a delay in advance payments
for July re grant funds for July - xc Social
Services, H. Hall; and filed.
4. Letter dated 5/14/80 from J. McGregor,
Chairman of Naples Waterway Council, re con-
cern of pollution of Naples Bay and requesting
Utility Director to transmit schedule of East
Naples sewer collection system - xc Utility
Director; and filed.
5. Letter dated 5/12/80 from Mrs. Kuhn registering
complaints re "high speed chases" by the Sheriff's
Dept. - xc Sheriff; and filed.
6. Letter dated 5/9/80 from Roanoke Iron & bridge
Works Inc., inquiring about the construction of
a new jail and requesting information re the
Cuullty':; [Jlan:> for an architect - xc County
Manager, Sheriff; and filed.
MC\y 20, 1980
30. Circular Letter 80-31 from the Dept. of !lousing Ii.
Urban Development, regarding Women's Business Enter-
prine Program, requesting a renponse to certain date.
xc County Manager and filed.
11. Letter, dilted 5/12/80, from Lee County Electric
cooperative, Inc. indicating the new street lights
and those removed from Marco District. xc Mr. Barksdale
and filed,
32. Copy of Rig Cypre9s Basin Board Agenda for 5/23/80
meeting. Filed.
33. Letter, dated 5/9/80, from Harlan Engineering Labora-
tories, Jnc., .egarding their interest in performing
soil investigation and materials testing fOL the
Willoughby Acres Water/Sewer System, and trannmitting
a copy of a Scope Sheet. xc Utility Director and
filed.
34. Letter dated April, 1980 from Moyer Assoc. Inc., inviting
inquiries regarding planning the needs of County cor-
rectional facilities and transmitting a copy of pamphlet
entitled "Planning Update 10" re same. xc T. Hafner,
County Manager., Sheriff Rogers and filed.
35. Copy of Depacunent of Community Affairs' pamphlet No.3
date~ May 19RO. xc W. Walker and filed.
36. Public Service Commission Notice, Volume l-80, i~sued
5/13/80 re hearing schedules. Filed.
37. DER Notice of Public Workshop, dated 5/9/80, re meeting
for. 5/29/80 at 10:00 A.M., Tallahassee, FL. re soliciting
comments regarding revisions to Chapter 17-l, Florida
Administr'ltivp Code. xc Utilities, Public Works and filed.
38. Copy of letter, dated 5/12/80, to Corps of Engineers
from Doug ~cGoon, Copela.ld, requesting the Corps to
allow him to continue to mine and lifting the cease
and desi.st order that has been imposed on him. xc
Planning and filed.
39. Copy of Collier County !listoria1 Commission minutes of
Ma~ch and April 1980. Filed.
40. Deparboental Monthly Reports ad follows:
a, Lib::ary, April 1980.
b. Golden Gate Fire Dept., April 1980.
c. purchasing, April 1980.
d. Building Maintenance, April 1980.
41. Copy of Senate Journals and !louse of Representative
Journals. Filed.
I~KE TRAFFORD MEMORIAL GARDENS CERTIFICATE DEEDS NOS. 221
AND 222 - RECORDED AND FILED FOR THE RECORD
Pur~uant to action of the Board January 10, 1978 wherein
the Chairman was authorized to sign various deeds to Lake
Trafford Memorial Gardens Cemetery lots, the following Deeds
Nos. 221 and 222 wpre recorded and filed for the record.
BG~~ 053 PACE'336
BOOK 053 PACE 339
May 20, 19!10
There being no further business for the good of the
Time: 11:55 A.M.
County, the Meeting was adjourned by order of the Chair -
ATTEST:
W:~LIAM J. REAGAN, CLERK
-
/
- /. ;/' ,
--2:;-u~/.~_'__:'--f/;;/~
/ I ) _ /'. .~
(/ - /~/>-..../ _. .
-,/ I
t
BOARD OF COUNTY COMHISSIONERS/EX
OFFICIO GOVERNING BOARD(S) OF
SPECIAL DISTRICTS UNDER ITS CONTROL