Loading...
BCC Minutes 03/25/1980 R ,'" ~,.t. ~.'~" CJ r..._J c::J . . . Naples, Florida, March 25, 1980 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Board of County Commissioners in and for the County of Collier, and also acting as the Governing Board(s) of such special districts as have been created according to law and having conducted business herein, met on this date at 9:00 A.M. in Regular Session in Building "F" of the Courthouse Complex with the following members present: CHAIRMAN: Clifford Wenzel VICE-CHAIRMAN: Thomas Archer John A. Pi stor C.R. "Russ" Wimer David C. Brown ALSO PRESENT: William J. Reagan, Clerk; Harold L. Hall, Chief Deputy Clerk/Fiscal Officer; Jean Swindle, Edna Brenneman and Darlene Davidson, Deputy Clerks; C. William Norman, Coun~y Manager; Tony Pires, Assistant County Attorney; Gene Willett, Administrative Assistant to the ;. . County Manager; Tom Hafner, Public Safety Administrator; Terry Virta, Conmunity Development Administrator; Danny Crew, Planning Director; Clif- ford Barksdale, Public Works Administrator/ Engineer. Jeffory Perry, Zoning Director; and William McNulty, Communications Director/Sheriff's Department. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA 14arch 25, 1980 NOTICE: ALL PERSONS SPEAKING ON ANY AGENDA MUST REGISTER PRIOR TO THE ITEM BEING HEARD. REQUESTS TO ADDRESS THE BOARD ON SUBJECTS WHICH ARE NOT ON THIS AGENDA MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE COUNTY MANAGER AT LEAST 13 DAYS PRIOR TO THE DATE OF THE MEETING AND WILL BE HEARD UNDER "PUBLIC PETITIONS" AT 11:00 A.M. 1. INVOCATION 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE MG;( 052 fACE 235 ",.-'~""~'" ,., .....;e:'". ':<'!,->:;.,.:' 1 ,.' , '''~l'' .... l '- ..._- I ." ~, '"" ',.i.i,' ' · ,- " "W,,"~'~}'1<lIli;)'~'~';~ ao~ 052 _240 March 25, 1980 AGENDA - APPROVED WITH ADDITIONS Commissioner Pistor moved, seconded by Commissioner Archer and carried unanimously, that the Agenda be approved with the fOllowing additions: 1. Public Hearing FDPO-80-V-2 filed by Marco Island Eagle requesting a 36 inch variance in elevation from the required 12 NGVD as required by the FDPO for property located in and being a portion of Block 113 of March-Beach, Unit 4 (Continued from March 18, 1980) Requested by Chairman Wenzel. 2. Workshop to be held at 1:30 P.M. with two (2) items to be discussed. a. Presentation of (5) five Engineering Consultants re East Naples Fire Hydrants. b. Presentation of the Fiscal Policy for the FY 1980-81 by Fiscal Officer Hall. 3. The canvassing results for the March 11, 1980 Referendum to be added to the Marco Sewer Referendum results under the BCt's report - requested by Chairman Wenzel. 4. Paul Nuckolls comments re the Alcoholic Beverage Laws and the issuance of alcoholic beverage consumption permits in Collier County - requested by County Attorney Pickworth. 5. Resolution amending the legal description re Goodland Water . System condemnation - requested by County Attorney Pickworth.! 6. Request that the presentation re Senior Citizens Center be considered a workshop item rather than under Public Petitions,- by County Manager Norman. MINUTES OF MARCH 4, 1980 - APPROVED AS PRESENTED Commissioner Pfstor moved, seconded by Commissioner Archer and carried unanimoUSly, that the minutes of March 4, 1980 be approved as presented. PROCLAMATION DECLARING THE 1980'S THE "DECADE OF BROADCASTING"-. ADOPTED Commissioner Archer moved, seconded by Commissioner Wimer and carTied unanimously that the Proclamation, as read for the record by Commissioner Archer, declaring the 1980's to be the "Decade of Broadcasting", be adopted. * * * * * r--'" rI r--' , * ,t - '"r . ~~~'!a:.i.t.i,!..~;";.;..':, f-~..~ ~..;"'.....~..._, ., ..... , - --, ' ,,' "" aoOK 052 fACE 2'42 March 25, 1980 RESOLUTION NO. 80-64 EXPRESSING APPRECIATION TO THE NAPLES AREA CHAMBER OF CO""ERCE FOR THEIR ASSISTANCE AND SUPPORT OF THE ONE CENT GAS TAX REFERENDUM QUESTION - ADOPTED Commissioner Wimer moved, seconded by Commissioner Archer and carried unanimously, that Resolution No. 80-64 expressing the Board's appreciation to the Naples Area Chamber of Commerce for their assistance and support of the one cent gas tax referendum question, be adopted. The document was accepted by Mr. Jim McLaughlin on behalf of the Chamber. * * * * * * * * * * r---'-' 1 ~ r---- r " l aoox 052 PACE 244 March 25, 1980 . RESOLUTION NO. 80-65 EXPRESSING APPRECIATION TO THE NAPLES tITY COUNCIL FOR THEIR ASSISTANCE AND SUPPORT OF THE ONE CENT GAS TAX REFERENDUM QUESTION _ ADOPTED Commissioner Wimer moved, seconded by Commissioner Archer and carried unanimously, that Resolution No. 80-65 expressing the Board's appreciation to the Naples City Council for their assistance and support of the one cent gas tax referendum question, be adopted. Mayor Anderson of the City of Naples accepted the document on behalf of the Council. * * * .f * * * * * * * * r--...' 1 ~ .---.. '.~~' &O~ 052 Mtt246 . March 25, 1980 , r,~ RESOLUTION NO. BO-55 EXPRESSING APPRECIATION TO THE NAPLES DAILY NEWS FOR THEIR ASSISTANCE AND SUPPORT OF THE ONE CENT GAS TAX REFERENDUM QUESTION - ADOPTED Commissioner Wimer moved, seconded by Commissioner Archer and carried unanimously, that Resolution No. 80-66 expressing the Board's appreciation to the Naples Daily News for their assistance and support of the one cent gas tax referendum question, be adopted. The document was accepted by Mr. Tom Hayre on behalf of the Naples Daily News. ~ \', , :t; ~/ .f * * * * * * * * * * * * .... r---':-1 " ; <;'"i1"" ,~ ... :0-.. .,.,~ ........ ~ 052 _248 NAPLES AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE'S RESOLUTION REGARDING THE FOUR-LANING OF SR 951 AND SUPPORTING THE EFFORTS OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS TO ACCOMPLISH SAME - ADOPTED March 25, 1980 Commissioner Pistor read, in its entirety, a Resolutfon adopted by the Noples Area Chamber of Commerce in open session on March 19, 1980, which stated the Chamber's position of concern regarding the four-laning of SR 951 and their supportive stand as to the Board's efforts to accom- plish such needed improvements. Commissioner Pistor moved, seconded by Commissioner Wimer and carried unanimously, that the above-referenced Resolution be adopted by the Board of County Commissioners and forwarded to the necessary agencies for the appropriate action with the following stipulation, made by Commissioner Wimer: 1. That Chainman Wenzel's name be added to Paragraph 11. * * * * * * * * * * r---" , '--1 r-=;I r ..i~2:2~~.'~ - WK 052 PACE250 March 25, 1980 RESOLUTION NO. 80-57 RE PETITION FDPO-80-V-3 REQUESTED BY STEVEN STALKER FOR A VARIANCE FROM THE MINIMUM BASE FLOOD ELEVATION REQUIRED BY THE FLOOD DAMAGE PREVENTION ORDINANCE - ADOPTED Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on March 9, 1980 as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with the Clerk, public hearing was opened to consider Petition FDPO-80-V-3, filed by Steven Stalker, requesting a variance from the minimum base flood elevation required by the Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance. Planner Tom McDaniel identified the location of the subject property as being Lot 17, Block B, Unit 7 of Palm River Estates and more generally known as 309 Sharwood Drive. He sta~ed that the Petitioner is requesting a variance of 2.5 feet from the required elevation of 12.00 NGVD to a requested elevation of 9.5 NGVD in order that he may construct his personal Single-family dwelling unit. Mr. McDaniel verified that Mr. Stalker had been notified and had acknowledged by letter that the granting of this variance may have a significant effect on the cost of obtaining, flood insurance. Concluding, he explained, that the subject lot is in an area of grade level homes; complies with the spirit of Section 18 (7)(m) of the FDPO and the Staff recommends approval. In response to Commissioner Archer's question regarding an uninformed buyer purchasing a home that carried such a liability (in the way of greater expense in obtaining flood insurance), Planning Director Danny Crew stated he was researChing the possibility of having such information made part of the Official Records in the Tax Assessor's office. In..this way, any future owner, through a title search, would be aware of thE sustained expense. Mr. Crew said he would bring the results of his research back to the Board for its consideration. Mrs. Nancy Bisbee of 2400 White Boulevard, Golden Gate Estates,' conwnented "That the Board makes these laws then grants a variance - so why make the law in the first placel" to which County Manager Norman replied that this ordinance was adopted under the guidelines and instruction of the federal government and had not been done on a local level. He explained that within the present Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance there are provisions made for the granting of such a variance when certain require- ments are met. 1- Ll r--~ , ~,',ll . ~.. I I , I' l: .. . ~;~,'tlJ'~'~;~~;;-" ," Cl \_.--".1 """':f."'''\~(/ CJ March 25, 1980 There being no other persons registered to address.the subject, Commissioner Pistor moved, seconded by Commissioner Archer and carried unanimously, that the public hearing be closed. Commissioner Pistor moved, seconded by Commissioner Brown and carried unanimously, that the Staff's recommendation of approval be accepted and Resolution No. 80-67 regarding Petition FDPO-80-V-3, filed by Steven Stalker, be adopted. .,. .,. .,. .,. .,. .,. .,. .,. .,. .,. 80~K 052 r~cE25f , .~~.,) ';'J.. [.=:J J CJ March 25, IS PETITION FDPD-SO-V-4 FILED SY THE NATIONAL BANK OF COLLIER COUNTY REQUESTING A VARIANCE FROM THE MINIMUM BASE FLOOD ELEVATION REQUIRED BY THE FLOOD DAMAGE PREVENTION ORDINANr.E - WITHDRAWN Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on March 9, 1980 and in the Marco Island Eagle on March 13, 1980, as evidenced by Affi- davits of Publication filed with the Clerk, public hearing was opened to consider Petition FDPO-80-V-4, filed by The National Bank of Collier County, requesting a variance from the minimum base flood elevation required by the Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance. Planner Tom McDaniel reviewed the request by the National Bank of Collier County requesting a variance from the minimum base flood elevation required by the Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance and identified the. subject property as being Tract M, Unit 6, Marco Beach Subdivision and more generally known as being located on Bald Eagle Drive at the intersection of Route 92. Mr. McDaniel stated that the petitioner is aSking for a elevation of 8.5 feet which would result in a variance of 3.5 feet decrease from the required 12.0 feet indicated In the FDPO. He gave the physical description of neighboring property as being: To the west (across platted Heathwood Drive) is vacant land being actively developed for single family homes - To the east (across Bald Eagle Drive) are single family homes and vacant single family lots and to the South (across SR-92) is vacant land and the Marco Island Racquet Club. Mr. McDaniel explained that the petitioner's request is based on "ease of access and convenience for its vehicular and pedestrial customers" but that Staff is of the opinion that the petitioner has not submitted any information which would indicate an extraordinary hardship as the stated problems of access are the same as any bank building in a flood zone resulting in the Staff's recommendation of disapproval for said petition. Commissioner Pistor said he had had conversations with the President of the proposed bank which indicated that the petitioner and his architect do intend to flood proof the bottom 3~ feet of the building and provide the necessary flood proofing panels with rubber gaskets installed. in the event it would be necessary to evacuate the building. The only area in question is the one that houses the "pneumatic tubes" which accOlIIl'IOdate aDDl( 052 PACE 255 l . . '~~, . ~:l::'.::~:~~?:1:Wlj<" ..: ~.- - ..-..- ~OOK 052 'ACE 256 March 25, 1980 the drive-in tellers building and as he previously said, these will be so constructed as to allow a complete shut-off of such mechanisms. Commissioner Pistor expressed surprise that the Planning Department was unaware of the petitioner's intentions to flood proof the building in the manner referenced above and he was of the opinion that such a petition should not have come before the Board. Architect Herb Savage stated his only concern has been that Staff will require the flood proofing of the "drive-in tellers" (which was clarified to mean the "mechanical pneumatic tubes" not the building which will house the people), Planning Director Danny Crew responded that this would be no problem so long as some provision is made to preclude the water from backing up into the building. Following the Staff's assurance to Mr. Savage that the plans for the bank do meet the FDPO requirements and no variance is required, Commis- sioner Wimer moved, seconded by Commissioner Pistor and carried unanimously, that Petition FDPD-SD-V-3 be withdrawn. ORDINANCE NO. 80-30 RE PETITION NZ-80-1-C BY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT REQUESTING AN AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING SECTION 3, DEFINITIONS: SECTION 25 RT DISTRICT; SECTION 27, FVR FISHING VILLAGE DISTRICT; SECTION 34, PC PROFESSIONAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT. AND SECTION 34, GRC DISTRICT BY PROVIDING DEFINITIONS FOR TIME SHARED ESTATES AND LOCATION OF THESE TYPES OF UNITS - ADOPTED Legal notice having been pUbliShed in the Naples Daily News on March 6, 1980 as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with the Clerk, public hearing was opened to consider Petition NZ-80-1-C, filed by the County Planning Department requesting an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance which will provide definitions and locations for "time share estates". Planning Director Danny Crew presented the petition, saying there has been considerable concern pertaining to "time share estates and/or interval ownership" and where they should be located in the County. He stated that during the study undertaken by Staff regarding this area of concern, trips had been made to Sanibel Island to determine how they had handled their several "time share estates" projects. Discussion was held with both the planning staff of Sanibel Island and a manager of one of the facilities with the result being the composition of the proposed amendment. Mr. Crew ,-- ,.---, r" .. II L:l .J CI March 25, 1980 explained that such projects are different from the general condominium complex in that there is activit,>, generated more related to the motel/hotel situation than that of a condominium project. The proposed amendment to the Zoning Ordinance will: 1. Provide definitions for Time-Share Estates, Time-Share Estate Facilities, Time-Share Units, and Time-Sharing Vacation Plans. 2. Permits Time-Share Estate Facilities in the "RT" and "FVR" Districts as a permitted principal use, but requires a pro- visional Use for sales anrl promotional activities. 3. Permits Time-Share Estate Facilities in the "PC" District as a provisional use. 4. Permits Time-Share Estate Facilities ~s a permitted principal use in the "GRC" District which a'so includes sille!> and promotional activi ti es. There b~ing no persons registered to address the issue, Commissionpr Archer moved, seconded by Commissioner Pistor and carried unanimously, that the public hearing be closed. Commissioner Archer moved, seconded by Commissioner Wimer and , carried that the ordinance as numbered and titled below be adopted and entered into Ordinance Book No. 11. i ORDINANCE 80 - ..3.!L- .' AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 76-30 THE ZONING REGULATION FOR THE UNINCOR- PORATED AREA OF THE COASTAL AREA . PLANNING DISTRICT BY AMENDING SECTION 3, DEFINITIONS; SECTION 25, RT-RESIDEN- TIAL . TOURIST DISTRICT; SECTION 27, FVR-FISHING VILLAGE RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT; SECTION 32, PC-PROFESSIONAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT; AND S~CTION 34, GRC-GENERAL RETAIL COMMERCIAL, AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. PETITION V-80-3-C BY GARY R. KLUCKHUN REQUESTING A VARIANCE TO CONSTRUCT A DUPLEX ON LOT 39, BLOCK 4, MARCO HIGHLANr.S - DENIED - STAFF AUTHORIZED TO REVIEW PRESENT ZONING OF SAID BLOCK OF LOTS IN MARCO HIGHLANDS Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on March 9, 1980 and in the Marco Island Eagle on March 6, 1980 as evidenced by Affidavits of Publication filed with the Clerk, pUblic hearing was opened to consider Petition V-80-3-C, filed by Gary R. Kluckhun, requesting a varianr.e to construct a duplex on a 9,000 square foot lot instead of the required 13,000 square feet oi lalld area, on I.ot 39, Block 4, Marco Highlands. BOOK 052 fACE257 ,(~,,,,--! .::,:" ~:i~:~':""..;:::..~:~,/":,, . BOOK 052 PACE258 I i I i , '.~;.,...:f~'''' " '\~'~'~>>"~~~"" I March 25, 1980 Zoning Director Jeff Perry reviewed the petition, saying that the subject property is Just east of Elkcam Circle on Sixth Avenue. There are 19 lots zoned "RM-IA" all of which are individually non-conforming and below the minimum lot area required for a duplex with 6 duplexes directly across the street from the petitioner's lot, having been built before the density change in 1973 and 1974. The lots on either side of the subject property are vacant and the block of lots directly behind the petitioner's lot is zoned "RS-4" single family. Mr. Perry stated that the executive summary identifies the answers determined by Staff to be proper according to the guidelines set by the Board of Zoning Appeals. He concluded his remarks with the Staff's recommendation of denial. Petitioner Gary Kluckhun submitted photographs of the subject lot whIch showed the position of the present duplexes across the street and the lot itself. He stated his lot is located one lot removed from the commercial ."1 zoning that is adjacent to the "duplex zoning' and he is of the opinion that when the property was zoned, it was for the purpose of being a "buffer area". An attempt has been made to buy one of the two remaining vacant lots but with no success so that the suggestion from Commissioner Pistor that he purchase additional land in order to meet the requirements for the construction of a duplex cannot be accomplished. He concluded his remarks with the statement that his plan meets all required setbacks and parking stipulations and the b'Jilding would be an asset to the area. Discussion followed which covered the inevitability of the other owners of the adjacent lots to ask for the same consideration in the way of a variance; the fact that, under the old zoning, the subject lot was zoned "duplex"; the unavailability of the petitioner to purchase the adjoining lots; Real Estate Agent Gary Lee's comments that housing of this nature would be a welcome addition to the neighborhood and would be the highest and best use of the land; and the good design of the proposed duplex. There being no other persons registered to speak on the issue, Commissioner Pistor moved, seconded by Commissioner Archer and carried unanimously, that the public hearing be closed. r" "', .--'\ r--.. . . ..', ' , ~ ~ ',' ~,' ~ "', . .1;.,1 . '. .,,'.1:, ,f'.\::. "~~':"/''''~l''''~j\~;~f ~"t ["-'-'J J CI March 25, 1980 Commissioner Archer asked if the only use the property can be put to is that of a single family dwelling and was answered in the affirmative, following which Commissioner BrOwn moved for the approval of the petition. The motion died for the lack of a second. Commissioner Pistor moved, seconded by Commissioner Archer and carried 4/1, with Commfssioner Brown dissentfng, that the Staff's recommendation be accepted and the petitioner's request for a variance be denied. Commissioner Archer commented that he would like to see something worked out whereby the subject property could be used because he is of the opfnion that putting a single family dwelling on the lot is not an equitable solution; however when faced with making an objective decision on the current request, he had to vote in the negative as to do otherwise would invite similar requests from others. Commissioner Wimer said that because of the interest expressed in this petition and this particular lot, he would like to make a motion that would direct the Planning Staff to look into the zoning of this block of lots, determine if the present zoning is appropriate and if not, what zoning they would recommend. Motion seconded by Commissioner Pistor and carried unanimously PETITION V-80-4-C BY HORACE CROMWELL REQUESTING VARIANCE TO EXPAND A BUILDING WITH A NON-CONFORMING SIDE YARD SETBACK IN PINE RIDGE INDUSTRIAL PARK _ CONTINUED UNTIL STAFF CAN REVIEW THE PRESENT ZONING RE SIZE'OF LOTS Legal notice having been publfshed in the Naples Daily News on March 9, 1980 as evidenced by the Affidavit of Publication filed with the Clerk, public hearing was opened to consider Petition V-80-4-C, filed by Horace Cromwell, requesting a variance to expand a bUildng with a non- conforming setback on the side for that property located on Washington Street in the Pine Ridge Industrial, Park. Zoning Director Jeff Perry revfewed the petition and identified the petitioner's request as a variance to construct an addition to an industrial building using an existing 2 foot side yard setback instead of providing the required 15 feet. He gave the following facts as background information: 1. The building was constructed along with 5 similar bUildings when the land was zoned "C-4" (heavy commercial) which permitted "0" side yard setbacks. 8a~K 052 fACE 2'59 ,.,....'; ~ .~ ':, . ..':._..",><jtl:{;:~,:~)t; , ~ --_.,~~-~--~ ~_ ,~. , ::...~:..~~~,."~. Jt..'!f.l__L.c,"~~;'_!J ,,I '- BOOK 052 PACE260 March 25, 1980 "2. The land was rezoned by the County in 1974 to "I" Industrial which requires a 15 foot side yard. 3. Mr. Cromwell purchased the property in 1978 with the thought of expanding the building in the future. 4. The lot is 50' wide with the existing 30' wide building located with a 2' side yard on one side and 18' side yard on the other side. Mr. Perry said that when Mr. Cromwell came in for a building permit to expand the subject building he was denied, and at that time he told the department of another building, 10c~ted immediately south of his property, that had been "added to"fn the recent past. Mr. Perry said that after investigation of the incident referred to ~y Mr. Cromwell, it was determined that the addition of such a building had been made with false information, the owner has been notified to either remove the addition, apply for an after- the-fact variance or obtain enough property to make. the structure legal. No communication has been forthcoming from the notified owner to date. It is the recommendation of the Staff that the petition be denied with Mr. Perry noting that the petitioner could make a small addition by coming in 15 feet on the required side yard and that no hardship has been identified, Commissioner Archer inquired as to what jeopardy and/or hurt would result if the petitioner were granted the variance and Mr. Perry answered that even though there are presently structures that do not meet the zoning require- ments, each current request for a variance must be determined by the new "I" Industrial designation. County Manager Norman commented that he realizes the Board has had difficulty with the problem of the legal interpretation of a "hardship" as something other than financial and that it should be concerned about the legal implications of granting this variance in terms of the justification .. that is given for granting it as something other than meeting the prescribed meaning of the word "hardship" because this could jeopardize whether or not the Board had the proper justification for establishing a 15 foot setback in the ordinance in the first place. He asked for comments from Assistant County Attorney Pires. Mr. Pires explained that if a variance is granted to Mr. Cromwell, the petitioner, then the same variance must be allowed to other petitioners in the same area yet he, himself, cannot see what use the building could be put to even with the smaller addition that would be allowable under present zoning. /--; '--1 ~.~ lG ~ ~ o ~ ~ /;, ;',<;'-+ ;- '- :: ~ ~ ( ~.~,. ~.> r.::.J I.__J CI March 25. 1980 Commissioner Archer said that if the present zoning only allows the construction of a 20' building on a 50' lot then somewhere along the way a _is1 has been made. Although he does not agree with the 2 foot setback on the side, he does think that a 15 foot setback is too much and with this thought in mind, he would suggest that the petition be continued, without prejudice. and give the Staff an opportunity to look into the matter of the subject lots. Mr. Cromwell, stated that he had purchased the subject building with the understanding that it could be added to which would make the building consfst of 1500 square feet. When he applied for his building permits he was told that he would have to apply for a variance and come before the Board with the request, although Mr. Perry assured him he would have no problem. Mr. Cromwell concluded his remarks with the statement that he was surprised that Mr. Perry had changed his mind about the granting of the variance. Commissioner Arch er moved, seconded by Commissioner Wimer and carried unanimously, that the petition be continued and that the Staff be instructed to look into the rationale behind the present zoning and determine if some recommendation can be made regarding a change in the designation of such lots and structures. PETITION FDPO-80-V-2 BY MARCO ISLAND EAGLE REQUESTING APPROVAL FOR A VARIANCE FROM THE MINIMUM BASE FLOOD ELEVATION REQUIRED BY THE FLOOD DAMAGE PREVENTION ORDINANCE - WITHDRAWN Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on March 2, 1980 and in the Marco Island Eagle on March 6. 1980, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication previously filed with the Clerk, pUblic hearing was continued from the March 18, 1980 meeting to consider petition FDPO-80-V-2 filed by the I Island Eagle, requesting approval for a variance from the minimum base flood elevation required by the Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance. Planner Tom McDaniel reviewed the petition, saying the Marco Island Eagle is requesting a 3' flood variance in order to construct a "Butler" steel building for a printing press/compoSition room. Mr. McDaniel stated that the Board had requested that he and the petitioner "get together" and work out flood proofing plan. This was done when he met with Mr. Herb Savage, Architect, with the result being that the first floor of the proposed construction would be three (3) feet of water-proofed block and this first floor would house the above-referenced printing press/composition room while the second floor would be the "I)!/tler" steel building. Mr. McDaniel stated that such construction would be compliance with the FDPO. -f,.'i.;"'''' p \\ ;.."\'{:'\ "~i:~~'> r"' or _,. '.~'." . _. ""'/'.il@~' ,,','..~"'i1!." ' . . ' 11 . 'II Ijo &OOK 052 PACE 262 March 25, 1980 Mr. Savage, said that he and Mr. Tamplfn, petitioner, concur with Planner McDaniel and the constructfon will be as prevfously stated. Commissioner Archer moved, seconded by Commissioner Wimer and carried unanimously, that petition FDPQ.80-V-2 filed by Marco Island Eagle, be wi thdrawon. Mr. Savage asked to comment on the future meeting of federal agencies regarding the design of hydrostatfc panels for doors, saying he hopes that the resulting stipulatio~s and/or restrictions from such a meeting will be tempered with the Staff's recommendations. j' SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET REQUEST FOR FY 1979-80 TO MEET INCREASED COSTS OF AMBULANCE SERVICE - DENIED - STAFF INSTRUCTED TO RESEARCH CONTINGENCY FUND AND OTHER BUDGETS FOR THE NECESSARY FUNDS TO COVER INCREASED COSTS Legal notice haVing been published in the Naples Daily Hews on March 17, 1980 as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with the Clerk, pUblic hearing was opened to consider the request for a Supplemental Budget for FY 1979-80 to meet fncreased costs of ambulance service. Fiscal Officer Harold Hall gave the purpose of the public hearing as being an opportunity to bring information before the pUblic and to receive public input on the proposed amendment to the 1979-80 budget which would increase the General Fund by $222,000, saying such an increase would come from "increased revenues" anticipated from "interest income". Mr. Hall, in reviewing the background of the request, stated that there have been increased costs of ambulance servfces due to the provision of ambulance service to Immokalee and Golden Gate; the Contingency Account in the General Fund is insufficient to meet such a sum due to the prior commitments already made against it for the remainder of the year; a review of the revenues has disclosed' that there are "increased revenues" anticipated from "interest income" due to the big increase in interest rates which, together with the County's current investments, have resulted in a significant increase in "interest income" and this sum of monies would be more than sufficient to cover the requested amendment. Hr. Hall said that ordinarily such increased income would go into the "Cash Carryover" for the following year but in this case, the County is fortunate in that there is an increased income to offset the increased ,-. r--" r-"--'" c:J ..J CI March 25, 1980 expendfture with no other acr.ounts being affected. For t~is reason, it is the Clerk's recommendation t~at the Board of County Commissioners adopt the proposed Supplemental Budget to appropj.iate this revenue and this amount of expenditure for ambulance services in accordance with the detailed Supplemental Budget which lists the line items that would be increased in both the expenditures and the line items in revenues that woul d be increased to refl ect the "i ncrease in i nteres t income". The fOllowing people spoke in opposition to the adoption of the proposed Supplemental BUdget: Mr. Mike Zewalk of 4840 West Boulevard, Naples - ~pr~senting North Naples Civic Association Nance of 2400 White Boulevard, Naples - representing self Bruce Holly of 2160 Estey Avenue - representin East Naples - Civic Assocfation Mr. Marshall Webb of 5501 Sholtz Street - representing Naples Manor Property Owners Association Mr. Bill Lagan of 2777 Riverview Drive - representing self Fisc~l Officier Hall, in adding to his previous summary, stated it had been known that there would be an increase in costs but it was not until the contract was signed that the exact figure could be determined and, even though the previous comments made by the public are appreciated, the ..County does have a contractual obligation. Mr. H~ll concluded with the ,. observation that several other alternatives had baen 1r.oked into but this is the best one and he recommends approval of the proposed Supplemental Budget. County Manager Norman explained that even by denying the Supplemental Budget, th~ contract with Americ~n Ambulance cannot be reversed. He emphasized the point that the County now has a binding responsibility and there are no provisions for terminating, unilaterally, the present contract provisions unless the contractor defaults. He concluderl that if the Staff's recommendation is not accepted then another way of paying the referenced expenses must be founc. There being no other persons registered to ~ddress the issue, Commissioner Archer moved, seconded by Commissioner Brown and carried unanimously, that the public hearing be closed MOK 052 PAc~263 &OOK 052 PACE 264 March 25, 1980 Commissioner Archer moved that the Staff's recommendation be acc~ptcd and that the Supplemental Budget for FY 1979-80, be adopted. Commissioner Brown seconded and the motion failed 2/3 with Chairman Wenzel, Commissioners Wimer and Pistor dissenting. FOllowing the requests for advertising having been acted upon. Commis- sioner Wimer moved, so that Staff could have instructions regarding the deni, of the proposed Supplemental Budget, that the Staff be directed to research the Contingency Fund and all other budoets of the County under the Board of County COITll1issioners to come uo with the necessary monies and bring such recommendations back to the Board of County Commissioners in the form of a budget amendment. The motion was seconded by Chairman Wenzel and carried 3/2 with the following roll call vote: Commissioner Wimer Chairman Wenzel Commissioner Brown Commissioner Archer Commissioner Pistor Aye Aye Aye Nay HilY .j rETITION TOR-80-1-C, LELY ESTATES. INC. REQUESTING APPROVAL OF GUARANTEE THAT "ST" LAND WILL NE\'ER BE DEVELOPED IN RETURN FOR TRANSFE.~ OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS FOR PROPERTY LOCATED EAST OF BARE rOOT BEACH TN SECTIOMS 6 AND 8, T48S R25E - ADVERTISING AUTHORIZED FOR PUBLIC HFARINr. APRIL 22, 1980 Corrmissioner Archer moved, seconded by Commissioner Pistor and carried unanimously. that Petition TDR-80-1-C, filed by Lely E!otates, Inc. l'equesting approval of guarantee the "ST" land will never be devp.looed in return for transfer' of development rights for property located east of Barefoot Beach in Section 6 and Section B, T48S, R25E, be authorized for advertising for public hearing on April 22. 1980. REVISED FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR PRICE STREET ROAD IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT _ ADVERTISING AUTHORIZED FOR PUBLIC HEARING APRIL 29, 1980 Commissioner Archer moved, seconded by Corrmissioner Pfstor and carried unanimously, that the revised Final Assessment Roll for Price Street Road Improvement District, be authorized for advertising for public hearing on April 29, 1980. VACATION OF A FIFTEEN FOOT DRAINAGE EASEMENT LOCATED IN KINGS LAKE _ ADVERTISING AUTHORIZED FOR PUBLIC HEARING APRIL 15. 1980 Commissioner Archer moved, seconded by Commissioner Pistor and carried unanimously, that the petition tc vacate a fifteen foot drainage easement located in Kfngs La~e b~ authorized for advertising for public hearing on April 15, 1980. r rl r"....,."" ,......, j ! -.--.... .,~~ .'.." ;'.,c';: . c.::J ,.I I:::J March 25, 1980 PETITION V-80-5-C, RANDY AND SANDY ACRES REQUESTING A VARIANCE TO CHANGE REAR YARD SETBACK ON LOT 3, BLOCK 3, NAPLES TWIN LAKES - ADVERTISING AUTHORIZED FOR PUBLIC HEARING APRIL IS, 1980 Commissioner Archer moved, seconded by Commi5s10ner Pistor and carried unanimously, that Petition V-8D-5-C filed by Randy and Sandy Acres requesting a variance to change rear yard setback from 10 foot required for a screen enclosure to 5~ foot, on Lot 3, Block 3, Naples Twin Lakes be authorized for advertiSing for public hearing on April 15, 1980. PETITION V-80-7-C, HOLLAND-N1ERICA INVESTMENTS REQUESTING A VARIANCE OF THE REQUIRED 15 FOOT SETDACK FOR PARKING IN FRONT OF A BUILDING WHICH IS LOCATED ON LOTS'21, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33 AND 34, COLLIER CITY - ADVERTISING AUTH- ORIZED FOR PUBLIC HEARING APRIL 22, 1980 Commissioner Archer moved, seconded by Commissioner Pistor and carried unanimously, that petition V-80-7-C filed by Holland-America Investments requesting a variance of the required 15 foot setback for parking in front of a building which is located on Lots 21, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33 and 34, Collier City, be authorized for advertising for public hearing on April 22, 1980. STAFF DIRECTED TO MAKE IN-DEPTH STUDY OF COUNTY OPERATING AN AMBULANCE SERVICE WITH COMPLETE RESEARCH GIVEN TO ALL AREAS OF CONCERN Because there has been much interest and "ado" over the item of the Supplemental Budget as it relates to the increased Ambulance Services in the County, Commissioner Wimer said he would like to make the following motion: That the Staff be instructed to prepare a detailed plan and accurate cost estimate for the County to conduct ambulance service on a continuing basis as a service unit employed by the Board of County Commissioners. Said plan shall have as high and complete level of services as is presently being conducted, with the necessary escalation factors. The plan and cost estimates shall be complete in every detail, including but not limited to: Organizational structure Staffing structure Personnel costs - direct and indirect Capital and operating equipment and replacement Capital costs for offices and other buildings Operational costs of building and equipment After these costs are developed, they are to be verified as accurate and reasonable costs by an outside firm recognized as expert in expansion costs. The plan and costs are then to be presented to the Board of County Commissioners for their review and comments. Commissioner Archer seconded the moti~n and it carried unanimously. M:JK 052 fACE 265 It 1 ~ .~~ ~' , t 'ip,_r'~"* k~:.~:'-~': .I(..,~ .."~....._...,,'~ ~~,,;~;''''''Ii.{~'';J.~ilt;'7W:<li'~i ;." March 25, 1980 MOX 052 PACE 266 PRESENTATION BY MR. PAUL NIJCKOLLS REGARDING THE ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LAWS AND THEIR EFFECT UPON THE ISSUANCE OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONSUMPTION PERMITS IN COLLIER COUNTY Mr. Paul Nuckolls, Attorney, informed the Board that due to the increase in popUlation of Southwest Florida, there will be G nUIl,ber of other quota lic~nses issued for the dispensing of alcoholic beverages throughout the area. In regard to this situation, Mr. Nuckolls said he had outlined in the brief cover letter, given each member of the Board (said letter included in a packet that has additional information from the Department of Business Regulations) how Collier County will double the number of available licenses very shortly. He said that the issuance of such licenses probably will be staggered based on a bill that the Depart- ment of Business Regulations/ Division of Alcoholic Beverages has recom- mended whereby they take three years to issue the subject licenses rather than doing it in six months as they have done in the past. Mr. Nuckolls stated that he had enclosed a copy of the proposed legislation in each packet he had submitted and requested that the Board members review the items at their leisure, considering the benefits of making the County's zoning somewhat more restrictive in order to be prepared to meet the additional licenses which will appear to be available in Collier County. USE OF IMMOKALEE COUNTY PARK ANn ADJACENT 1.75 MILES OF AIRPORT ROAD FOR MUSCULAR DISTROPHY BIKE-A-THON - APPROVED Commissioner Archer moved, seconded by Commissioner Pistor and carried unanimously, that the request for the use of the Immokalee County Park and adjacent 1.75 miles of Airport Road by the Inmokalee bike-a-thon supporters for a Muscular Distrophy Bike-A-Thon, Saturday, March 29, 1980 with Saturday, AprilS, 1980 as a rain-alternate date, be approved. GUN PERMIT NO. 80-2 APPROVED FOR ISSUANCE TO BRUCE VERNON ~HOPE WITH STIPULATION Assistant. to t~e County Manager Gene Willett said that the County Manager's office had rP.ceived a request for a concealed pistol permit from Bruce Vernon ~hope which indicated that Mr. Shope "carries controlled sub- stances and/or business receipts of 9reat value" in the course of con- ducting business during the normal work week and it is his desire to protect these valuables. Because the Ordinance No. 78-15, which cover such permits requires that there be documentary p,tfdence that there is no other means r- '--1 ,---;--:---\ I " ~~ ~:;..i.~1t~n~:>~, 1"" '. [=.l ,J CI March 25, 1980 of transportation available other than personal transport and that security services are not available and because'Mr. Shope has indicated an unwilling- ness to obtain such evidence, asking, instead, that he be allowed to appeal the County Manager's determination, the Staff has no altern~t1ve but to present the application to the Board and recommend denial. Chairman Wenzel stated that he does not think an individual should be made to "hire protection" when that person can, if he wants to., protect himself and if this is part of the stipulations in the Ordinance No. 78-15 then there is something wrong wIth the Ordinance. Commissioner Brown moved, seconded by Chairman Wenzel and carried unanimously, that Gun Permit No. 80-2 for Bruce V~rnon Shope be approved with the stipulation th~t all other requirements in Ordinance No. 78-15 be met, excluding the request for documentation of "no other means of transportation and/or security servi ces are ava ilable". NOTE: Deputy Clerk Swindle was replaced by Deputy Clerk Brenneman at this time - 11:00 A.M. RESOLUTION 80-68 CONCERNING COMPREHENSIVE ENERGY POLICY FOR COLLIER COUNTY _ ADOPTED County Energy Coordinator Mindy Bronson reviewed brIefly the resol- . . ution being presented for Board action stating that the purpose of the ~document is to establish a Comprehensive Policy Statement with regard to the use of energy in County operations and practices which will result in savings in energy costs for the County and the general public. The adoption of the resolution, said Ms. Bronson, will provide a reference for County policy and in-house procedures and that will be of benefit in the preparation of the budget and fiscal policy, and will also affirm the Board's commitment to energy conservation and its importance. Chairman Wenzel emphasized t~e need for enforcing the regulations and for setting an example throughout the County complex, following which Commissioner Wimer moved, seconded by Commissioner Pistor and carried 4/0 with Commissioner Archer tempor~rily absent, that Resolution ~0-68 establishing a Comprehen~ive Energy Policy for Collier County be adopted. aoaK 052 PACE 267 "'1"".~,.t" .:,'.....-.-, ,;, ...~......- Cl ] CI March 25, 1980 RESOLUTION 80-59 AUTHORIZING PRCJECT AGREEMENT WITH FDNR, DIVISION OF MARINE RESOURCES, TO EXPAND TWO FISHING REEFS IN THE GULF OFF MARCO ISLAND - ADOPTED Parks and Recreation Director Rollie Rice addressed the Board see~ing authorization to enter into a Project Agreement and resolution with the Stat! of florida, Department of Natural Resources, Division of Marine Resource~ for the purpose of expanding two artificial fishing reefs in the Gulf off Marco Island. He said that the application for a grant was sent to the State and that the Governor and Cabinet approved the financial assistance. Responding to Chairman Wenzel's query as to whether or not the monies would be divided equally, Mr. Rice rp.plied in the nega- tive, stating that th~ project originally called for three reefs; however, a permit for the Naples reef has not been secured and the decision was made to proceed with the two reefs because of the deadlines involved. It was noted by Mr. Rice that the grant for next year will be designated for the Naples reef. Commissioner Wimer moved for adoption of Resolution 80-59 authorizing the acceptance of an Artificial Reef Program Grant and the execution of an Agreement with FDNR for the purpose of expanding two artificial fishing .. reefs in the Gulf of Mexico waters off Marco Island in Collier Coun~y. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Pistor and carried 4/0 with Commissioner ~'Archer not present at the time of the vote. * * * * * * BO~K 052 fACE 275 l .. ,~:.... ./,,,. "\".", . :...,'t,Jt!{V'.::~~"';'~ ..---- 60DK 052 rAcr 280 March 25, 1980 PETITION FP-80-3C, KINGS LAKE UNIT 2, REQUESTING FIN~L PLAT APPROVAL ON PROPERTY LOCATED IN 57, T50S, R26E - APPROVED; IRREVOCABLE LETTER Of ~REDIT IN THE AMOUNT O~ $227,000 - ACCEPTED Planner Leo Layne reported that tho Engineel'1ng staff has reviewed the construct.ion drawings and final plat for Kings Lake Unit 2 and hili 'ouncj thllm to bo in conformllnno wi th tho Count,y'. lubdfvhon Regulations and it is recommended that the Board approve Petition FD_80-3C pertaining to same. Public Wor~,s Administrator/Engineer Cl1fford Barksdale responded in the negative to Chairman Wenzel's inquiry as to whether or not there is a drainage problem in the develop~~nt. Commissioner Pistor moved, seconded by Commissioner Wimer and carried 4/0 with Commissioner Archer not present, that Petition FP-80-3C, request- ing Final Plat Approval for Kings Lake Unit 2, located in Section 7, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, be approved, and that Irrevocable Letter of Credit in the amount of $227,000, issued by Clydesdale Bank Limited, London, England, be accepted, for the construction of the pave~ ment, curbs, sidewalk and services, in the subject Subdivision. PETITION FP-89-4C, THE RETREAT, REQUESTING FINAL PLAT APPROVAL FOR PROPERTY IN S9, T48S, R25E - APPROVED; ESC~OW AGREEMENT IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,323,234.06 - ACCEPTED Planner Lee Layne advised that the Engineering staff has reviewed the final plat and construction drawings for the development known as The Retreat and has found them to be in conformance with the County's Subdivision Regulations. Ms. Layne noted that the staff recommendation contained in the Executive Summary with regard to the matter is that the Petition be approved with the stipulation that the Final Plat not be recorded until approved security is provided to the County; however, since the recommendation was prepared, the security has been received and, therefore, the reconmendation is for approval witt-out stipulation. Commissioner Pistor moved, seconded by Commissioner Wimer and carried 4/0 with Commissioner Archer not present, that Petition FP-80-4C, requesting Final Plat approval for The Retreat, be approved, and that the Escrow Agreement between Ccncord, Ltd. and Dollar Mortgage Company, securing loan commitment in the amount of $1,323,234.06, be accepted. ( ..., . ....--, r'-'U i::'~f...-:--~~-:: ,"i' ( ..:J;,............ ~. :c, ...: . --~.; .'~.:~"~____-.a._,, 80~l( 052 fACE 288 March 25, 1980 BCC APPROVES CREATION OF HOUSING SPECIALIST/INSPECTOR POSITION AT PAY GRADE 40 (RE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM), AUTHORIZES HIRING OF INDIVIDUAL TO FILL POSITION AT 10% ABOVE MINIMUM, AND DELETES THE POSITIONS OF HOUSING REHABILITATION SPECIALIST AND CON- STRUCTION INSPECTOR FROM PROGRAM Planning Director Danny Crew recalled that earlier in the year he approached the Board requesting that one position in the ImmokalPQ/ Community Development Block Grant Program be upgraded in order tJ fill the position, noting that an individual has since been hired to ~~ke over the Program, and will be introduced to the Board in the very near' future. However, said Dr. Crew. problems have arisen in filling the other two positions in the Program due to the temporary nature of the positions and the remote location. Dr. Crew said that it has been suggested by the State Advisor that the remaining two positions be combined, with a higher pay rate, thus becoming more attractive for rotential applicants. tions, as contained in the Executive Summary, as follows: Commissioner Brown moved that the Board accept the staff recommenda- ! 1. That the Board of County Commissioners approve the c~ation of the position of Housing Special1st/Inspec~?r.at pay grade 40. 2. That the Board of County Commissioners authorize the hiring of an individual at 10% above the minimum. 3. That the Board of County Commissioners delete the positions of Housing Rehabilitation Specialist and Construction Inspector from the Program. Commissioner Pistor seconded the motion which carried 5/0 - Commissioner Archer having returned to the meeting. BOARD AUTHORIZES PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATOR TO PROCEED WITH PLANNING AND INSTALLATION OF STREET LIGHTS WITHIN THE NAPLES PARK STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT Public Works Administrator/Engineer Clifford Barksdale reviewed, the series of events which have taken place with regard to the Naples Park Street Lighting District since the District was created on September 19, 1978 by the adoption of Ordinance 78-47, as contained in the Executive Summary prepared by him. As Mr. Barksdale noted, a referendum was held on March 11. 1980 to again determine public opinion with the results favoring the lighting project. Therefore, said Mr. Barksdale, it is being requested that the Public Works Administrator be authorized to proceed with the planning and installin9 of the street lights within the subject District. f~"" , '--1 "..._ '0'" Cl L..J c::J March 25, 1980 Assistant County Attorney Anthony Pires stated that the results of the election are being contested, noting that the action is against the Canvassing Board and that the Board of County Commissioners have not been made a party to such action. Therefore, said Mr. Pires, the Board can proce.d to take action with regard to tre staff recommendation. Discussion followed concerning the implementation of the Pr~~ram with Mr. Barksdale advising that all of the lights would not be instal~e~ by October 1st; however, the Program budget would be for a full y~ar'~ cost based upon the installation of some of the lights prior to October 1st and some installed later. Responding to Commissioner Archer, Mr. Barksdale said that some preliminary design work has been done in order to arrive at an estimate of the costs involved; however, the final design work will not be done until there has been authority to proc~ed with the project, which is what is being requested. Commissioner Wimer moved, seconded by Commissioner Archer, that the staff recommendation be approved. Ms. Stella C. Lamartine, Naples Park resident, raised several questions with regard to the actual installation of the poles, the type of poles which will be erected, acquisition of the necessary rights-of-way, whether or not the estimated costs are still valid, and the like, all of which were responded to by Mr. Barksdale. Ms. Lamartine stated that she still has some concern over the project but that she is now better informed. Mr. Jerry Nofrio, 612 - 104th Avenue, N., pointed out what, in his opinion, were irregularities in the recent referendum. He also voiced concern that his property will be disturbed when the lights are installed and questioned whether or not the proposed number of lights are necessary. Chairman Wenzel commented that tb~ protest which has been filed will be turned over to the County's legal staff and that, in the meantime, there is considerable engineering work which must be done. Mr. Carl Pauly, Naples Park resident, stressed the need for the lights in the area, as he has done in the past, and observed that the cost will be less than $40.00 per year for an average home. BOOK 052 PACE 289 ',f'!; ',..'f;':. ,: ';' ~..__..J. ..J""""~,,,, 800K 052 PACE 290 March 25, 1980 Mr. Ken Williams, subject area property owner, urged the Board to proceed with the business of "lighting Naples Park" and also noted that the election results have been certified locally and transmitted to Tallahassee. Hr. Redmond Jones, 663 - l02nd Avenue, N., sugge<;ted th.:t the vote on the District should be declared null and void, c itin!~ r.everal incidents which occurred and upon which he bases his statement. Commissioner Wimer pointed out that th~.subject referendum was, in fact, a straw ballot and/or poll to obtain the consensus of the affected residents with regard to the District. Mr. Pires concurred with the Commis- sioner, adding the comment that, nevertheless, the elections laws apply. Mrs. Florence Nofrio, resident of Naples Park, expressed the view- point that the installation of street lights does nGt deter crime and also expressed concern over the additional energy which will be expended following the implementation of the lighting program. Commissioner Pistor explained that in an effort to improve the conditions, in subdivisions, and other matters which the Board is asked to approve, the Subdivision Regulations now require that all new subdivisions have street lights which is a fact that is now recognized as being an improvement and a necessity. Upon call for the question on the floor, the motion carried unanimously. SOUTHWEST FLORIDA MENTAL HEALTH OISTRICT PLAN FOR FY 1980-81 - APPROVED IN CONCEPT Mr. Ronald L. Meserve, Executive Director, Collier County Mental Health Clinic, Inc., addressed the Board for the purpose of reviewing the Southwest Florida Mental Health Plan for the Fiscal Year 1980-81;* as contained in the Executive Summary prepared hi him and distributed to the Board. He safd that approval of the Plan by the Local Govern- ing Body is required pursuant to Florida Statutes 394.75 (1)(b), pOinting out that presentation of the Plan is not a request for funds. There was a brief discussfon of the Plan, fOllowing which Commissioner Archer moved, seconded by Commissioner Wimer and unanimously carried, that the Southwest Florida Mental Health District Plan for FY 1980-81 be approved "in concept". *Note: Complete Plan on file in the Clerk to the Board's office. L:.l (..__1 c:J March 25, 1980 BCC APPROVES PROJECTED ADDITIONAL PAYMENTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $11,745 RE BAKER ACT (COLLIER COUNTY MENTAL HEALTH CLINIC, INC.) FOR PERIOD 4/15/80 THROUGH 5/30/80 Mr. Ronald L. Meserve, Executive Director, Collier County Mental Health Clinic, Inc., reviewed with the Board the statement entitled Baker Act Utilization Estimate, as prepared by him and distributed to the Commissioners. Mr. Meserve explained that the Ba~er Act ~~ovldes for in-patient psychiatric services and pointed out th". the )tIcal match allocated by the County for FY 1979-80, for such serl~~es, was $4~,485 which represents 25% of the tot.al payments and projected payments for the period 7/1/79 through 4/15/80 of $181.942 with the State providing 751. or $135,455. Mr. Meserve continued by stating that, as in the past, the amount of money required to fulfill the mandates of the law exceeded the allocation at the beginning of the year provided by the State and County. It is projected, said Mr. Meserve, that between 4/15/80 and the end of their fiscal year, which is June 30, 1980, a total of $46,985 additional will be required, with $35.239 provided by the State and $11,745 by the County, in order to have funds available to reimburse the providers of the subject services. He said that he is, therefore, requesting an additional allocation of $11,746, pursuant to what is, in his opinion, his obligation under Florida Statutes, for the balance of the Clinic's fiscal year. ~. Responding to Commissioner Brown's inquiry as to whether or not such funds are available, Fiscal Officer Harold Hall replied that tho only source of funds is the Contingency Fund. Commissioner Wimer moved, seconded by Commissioner Brown. that the Board approve the projected additional payment with regard to the Baker Act services in the amount of $11,746. County Manager C. William Norman asked if the State law mandates that the counties provide matching funds for the program with no "fixed cap" with Mr. Meserve responding in the affirmative. He said that it is assumed that the State will "come through" with thei r share of 75%, Observing that the amounts in the report are projections and that the figure could be less. &O:)K 052 fACE 291 eoox 052 fACE 292 March 25. 1980 Assistant County Attorney Pires inquired if there are provisions in the law regarding payments to psychiatrists ror psychia- tric evaluations of indigent patients pursuant to the Baker Act, such motions for costs averaging $75-$85 per patient. Mr. Meserve said that reimburse- ments for evaluations which are ordered by a judge are not $o~thing which the Clinic is permitted to fund under the Act. Upon call for the question, the motion carried 4/1 ~ith Chairman Wenzel voting in opposition. DCC APPROVES "GIVING PlACE ON COURTHOUSE GROUNDS" FOR CONSTRUCTION OF SENIOR CITIZEN CENTER, AS REQUESTED BY TRI-COUNTY NUTRITtON PROGRAM DIRECTOR; LEGAL STAFF DIRECTED TO P.ESEARCH STATUTES TO DETERMINE LEGALITY OF SUBJECT USE OF COUNTY PROPERTY: OTHER SITES TO BE CONSIDERED Pursuant to a request contained in the memorandum dated March 12, 1980 from D1rector MarthJ Skinner, Departrr.~nt of Social Services, to County Manager C. William Ncnnan, Conmi~sioner Wimer moved, seconded by C0IIRI1ssioner Brown, that "a place on the Courthouse grounds be g1ven~ for the establishment of a Senior Citizen Center. Regarding the location for such proposed center, Chairman Wenzel sugge~ted that the building be located wherever it is felt to be the most feasible for $uch construction. Commissioner Archer voiced agreement with the need far such a facilitYi however, in his opinion, such use of government property would be improper since the use of the building would be specifically for senior citizens' activities. Mr. Egon Hill, working in conjunction with Vicki Schuyler, Project Director for the "Tri-County Nutrition Program, agreed that the use would be for those persons sixty years of age and over. Upon call for the question, the motion on the floor carried 3/2 with Colrmissioners Archer and Pistor voting in opposir.ion. During the ensuing discussion, it was pointed out by Commissioner Archer that, if the building was declared a public building, the petitioners could not comply with the provisions of the grant being considered. Chairman Wenzel explained that the Board action gives the project sponsors the right to make the grant application and directed that the details regarding the project be brought back for review at a special meeting, if necessary. I. , I Cl CI L..._1 March 25, 1980 Later, in the afternoon session, the project was again discussed with Ms. Schuyler in attendance. Ms. Schuyler agreed that the proposed center would be a multi-purpose senior center and emphasized the need for the facility and the merits of having it located in the vicinity of the Courthouse. ^~~istant Countv Attorney Anthony Pires suggested that there are many questions which would have to be answered, among them whether or not the County has the authority to conveyor lease its propert~. Thp.re was further brief dIscussIon following which Commissioner' Archer moved, seconded by Commissioner Brown, that the action taken earlier in the Session regarding the proposed site on the Courthouse grounds for construction of a senior citizens center be rescinded. Discussion continued regarding the timetable for submitting the pre-application for the subject grant with Mr. Norman pointing out that the application must be written around a particular site on which title is held or there is a binding contract. It was Commissioner Wimer's suggestion that, in the event there is not sufficient time remaining to meet the Federal government requirements, that the issue be placed on the ballot in November to determine if the voters want to build and maintain such facility. Commisioner Archer said that if the previous action is rescinded then he would make the motion to direct the staff to determine if property is available, which can be afforded, and report back to the Board as soon as possible. Commissioner Pistor voiced his concern over using Courthouse property for the purpose under discussion due to the difficulty some persons may have with regard to transportation with Ms. Schuyler explaining that that is the reason why the complex property was chosen since, in the event the County establishes public transportation, the Courthouse will be one of the main "stopping points". She also pointed out that her program provides the only transportation system in the area and that if it were not for the Tri-County Nutrition Program approximately 1600 senior citizens could not get to the doctors' offices, the health clinics, and the like. 800K 052 fACE 293 BDDK . 052 PACE 294 March 25, 1980 Upon call for the question on the floor, i.e. that the action taken earlier in the Session with regard to the loc~tion of the proposed senior citizens cp.nter on Courthouse property, be rescinded, the motion failed 2/3 with Commissioners Wenzel, Brown and Wimer votiny in opposition. 'Chainnan Wenzel directed that the various questions regarding the project, which were discussed throughout the meeting, be researched and responses be forthcoming for Board review. FOUR DRAINAGE EASEMENTS FOR INr.TALLATION OF DRAINAGE FACILITIES IN CONNERS VANDERBILT BEACll ESTATES - APPROVeD ArID ACCEPTED FOR RECORDATION Public Works Administrator/Engineer Barksdale explained that, in an effort to improve drainage in the Vanderbilt Beach area, the County has undertaken the acquisition of drainage easements and the construc- tion of drainage outlets from thr roadway to the wateioway. The following easements have been received, as requested, said Mr. Barksdale: 1. Hanns R. Ehrhardt, Lot 19, Block C, Conners Vanderbilt Beach Estates, Unit No.1 (Channel Drive). 2. Charles E. Ward, Lot 12, Block Q, Conners Vanderbilt Beach Estates, Unit No.2 (Seabee Avenue). 3. ,Charles W. Wolfe, Lot 18, Block C, Conners Vanderbilt Beach Estates, Unit No.1 (Channel Drive). 4. William T and Barbara Polston, the East five (5) feet of Lot 19, Block D, Conner's Vanderbilt Beach Estates, Unit No.1. Commissioner Wimer moved, seconded by Commissioner Archer and unanimously carried. that the above four drainage easements in Conners Vanderbilt Beach Estates be approved and accepted for recordation. * * * * * * * t M,"'" ,. c:J 1__.J I:::J March 25, 1980 PRELIMINARY ACCEPTANCE OF KINGS LAKE UNIT 1 SUBDIVISION - GRANTED; IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT (CLYDESDALE BANK LTD.) IN THE AMOUNT OF $99.814 FOR ONE-YEAR MAINTENANCE - ACCEPTED Following brief review by Public Works Administrator/Engineer tlifford Barksdale, Commissioner Wimer moved, seconded by Commissioner Archer and unanimoUSly carried. that "Preliminary Acceptance" of Kings Lake Unit One be granted, and that Irrevocable Letter of Credit 113/GDH/JH/80/14A/R from the Clydesdale Bank Ltd., covering one-year maintenance periOd, be accepted, as recommended. EXCAVATION PERMIT APPLICATION 59.96, FRANK CRAPARO, FOR PROPERTY LOCATED IN S18. T49S. R26E - DENIED Public Works Administrator/Engineer Clifford Barksdale explained briefly the purpose for the excavation being requested in Excavation Permit Application 59.96, as filed by Frank Craparo, for property located in Section 18, Township 49 South. Range 25 East. Mr. Barksdale located the subject property on the colored map providp.d and, referring to the Executive Summary prepared by him, reviewed a previous permit, Excava- tion Permit 59.81, also filed by Mr. Craparo. which was considered by the Board on September 11, 1979 and denied bnsed on the staff's recommendation that t~e requested location would seriously interfere with the proposed construction of Pine Ridge Road Extension between Airport Road and 1-75. ;however, the Board subsequently approved Permit 59.81 on September 18, 1979 since t~e applicant and the staff agreed to relocating the proposed excava- tion to a distance no closer than 100 feet of the proposed edge of the pavement as an acceptable alternative. Mr. Barksdale continued by stating that the applicant is now requesting approval of Excavation Permit 59.96 for excavating in the area within the proposed acquisition area for the extension of Pine Ridge Road, said location having been previously denied. He said that the Water Management Advisory Board considered the request during its meeting of March 12, 1980 and recommended uenial with the staff concurring in the recommendation. It was pointed out by Mr. Barksdale that permitting the proposed eycavation 100 feet from the edge of the pavement, as mentioned above, is a compromise, according to both of the County's Excavation Ordinances, and that he would not recommend any further compromise. BOOK 052 fACt 299 1 j " .~~/.." : ~OOl( 052 ~ACE 300 March 25, 1980 Mr. Crapdro explained that he had been willing to accept the agreed-upon compromise sincfl "he hold to accept something" in order tt' proceed with his plans and added th~t at that time he was told the r1ght- of.way would be purcha~ed and cleared the early pdrt uf 1980. However. he continued, there has been no progress made and that legally, in his opinion, he has the right to utilize the property, which he owns. to the best of his ability. He said that, under his proposal, the excavation would be 20' outside the right-of-way, that he will put up a high enough dike to keep cars from going into the excavation, and that it is his desire to re- establish the drainage from his property as it exists at the present. Commissioner Pistor commented that it is unfortunate that progress on the subject roadway has been held up for financial reasons; however. with the passage of the additional gas tax referendum, the County is prepared to proceed according to plans for the road which have been established. ! Commissioner Wimer moved, seconded by Commissioner Brown, that the Board adopt the staff recOf1111endation that Excavation Permit Application 59.96 be denied. The motion carried unanimously. * * * RECESS: 12 :00 Noon until 1 :30 P. M. Oepllty Cl erk Brenneman was replaced by Deputy Clerk Davidson. * * * PRESENTATION RE CONSULTING ENGINEERING FOR THE EAST NAPLES FIRE HYDRANT DISTRICT CH2M HILL Mr. Ted Smallwood, representing the firm of CH2M Hill, gave a presenta- tion regarding the consulting engineering for the proposed East Naples Fire Hydrant District. He briefly outlined the reasons he feels CH2M Hill is best suited for the consulting work for the subject project including CH2M Hill's experience with projects that lie within the subject district; the firm's past working relationship with tl1e County regarding various projects; and. CH2M Hill's expertise with the water sewer systems that the proposed hydrants will be built in conjunction with. He stated that because CH2M Hill has completed many topographical graphs, aerial photo- graphs, and aerial site-layouts of the area in question, said firm is duly ..'~ . , ," c:J h._J I::J March 25. 1980 qualified and knowledgeable of all the pertinent information necessary to do the best job possible. Mr. George Hermanson, also representing CH2M Hill, explained the approach that said fIrm shall undertake in the event that they are chosen as the consulting engineering firm for the project. Commissioner Pistor asked if there would be adequate personnel and time available within CH2M Hill's schedule in order to handle an additional project and referred to recent delays with other projects that said firm is involved in with the County? Mr. Smallwood stated that there is sufficient personnel at CH2M Hill, including a new engineer who will. b~ heading up the project if CH2M Hill is awarded same, and noted that the firm of CH2M Hill was not responsible for the delays on the projects mentioned by Commissioner Pistor, rather, negotiations for transfer of properties, etc. were, and, he further stated that the only delay his firm may be considered responsible for is approximately one month's delay in the finalization of a report that he himself inaccurately approximated. Hearing no other questions from the Board, Chairman Wenzel thanked the representatives from CH2M Hill and called for the next presentation. CRAVEN THOMPSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. Mr. Edward Kant, Executive Vice President of Craven Thompson & Assoc., gave a presentation regarding the consulting engineering for the East Naples Fire Hydrant District including a brief background of the firm, noting that said firm has been established in Naples since July of 1979. He gave a description of the project as he sees it and explained that he considers it to be a "straight forward" project. He also covered some prior experience his firm has had regarding similar projects; the willingness of his firm to serve the County; and, their ability to begin the project almost immediately. Hearing no questions from the Board for Mr. Kant, Chairman Wenzel thanked him for his presentation. * * * Between presentations the subject of cost estimates for the proposed project and the consulting firm that the Board will decide on was covered BO:lK 052 PACE 30t BOOK 052 rACE 302 March 25, 1980 by Mr. Barksdale. He said the cost of the entire project has bccn figured at approximately $400,000 and the Consultant's fee will not exceed 6% of that figure. Regarding the background material for the proposed project, Mr. Barksdale told the Board that the map before them today depicts the only infonmation the County has at this time regarding the location of existing mains, lines, and hydrants in the district. He noted that this information has been coordinated with the Fire Chief for the East Nr.ples Fire Department. The question of availability of other needed background information was discussed and Mr. Barksdale said that any information regarding City of Naples' lines, etc. would have to come from the C1ty'S consultant who is CH2H H111. HOLE, MONTES & ASSOC. Mr. Sergio Montes, representing Hole, Montes & Associates, gave a presentation regarding the engineering consulting for the proposed East Naples fire Hydrant District project. He stated that the County is familiar with his firm's background and he noted that said firm wants to do this work for ~he County. He referred to past projects that his firm has handled for the County and stated that a new member of the firm, formerly of the City of Tampa, will be the project engineer if Hole, Montes & Assoc. is awarded the contract for the project. When asked by Commissioner Archer if Mr. Montes is in possession of the baCkground data regarding the proposed project, Mr. Montes replied that his firm had only the same informaton that the County has at this point in time Commissioner Pistor asked if Mr. Montes is familiar with the size of the lines, etc. of the project and Mr. Montes answered affirmatively. . Hearing there were no further questions from the Board, Chairman Wenzel thanked Mr. Montes for his presentation. * * * Upon conclusion of the above-mentioned presentation, there was some dis- cussion among the Board regarding the size of the proposed water lines, the mains. and the existing line locations. Commissioner Archer asked Mr. Barksdale what effect the proposed additional lines, mains, and hydrants will have on the present users' water pressure? Mr. Barksdale stated that the water pressure will be increased as will the flow. ; I d j I .1 ,I " !,i ;.1 :l J.~ ./ 4 , !~! ~l .l! , . '. 'l '~I 'j I Cl J March 25, 19BO KRIS JAIN & ASSOC. Mr. Kris Jain, representing Kris Jain & Assoc., gave a presentation regarding t~e proposed East Naples Fire Hydrant Project and stated that his firm wishes to represent the County as the consulting engineer. for said project. fie gave a brief description of the firm's background. as well as his own, and stated that Kris Jain & Associates was established by himself some five years ago. He gave a synopsis of t~e firm's experience including past projects, local involvements and organizations that said firm has been working in cooperation with over the last five years. Mr. Jain referred to the enginr.e~ing consulting fur the recently built Collier County Satellite Bldg. that his firm handled and he pointed out several features of same buildinG dS examples of the "expertise" of Kris Jain & Assoc. Ml'.- Jain stated that if his firm was to be awarded the contract for the proposed project. then, the firm of Source Inc. of South Florida would become part of a team along with Kris Jain & Assoc. that will handle the desfgnfng aspects, subcontracting, and provfde the additfonal technical resources for the subject project. He said that the firm of Source Inc. is headed by Mr. Jim Elliott. of Cape Coral, a qualified Civil Engineer with many years'-experience. He covered the various projects that Source Inc. has been involved in regarding water a~d pipe lines as well as various ; affiliated organizations to which Mr. Elliott belongs. Mr. Jain described the proposed project for the fire hydrants in the East NE.ples area and pointed out various deficiencies within the present layout of same. He stated that he is familiar with the plans for same project and has met with the County Engineering Department and the East Naples Fira Department regarding the proposed project. He also stated that if awarded the subject contract, the firm of Kris Jain & Assoc. can start on the proposed project in a matter of two weeks and that he calculates the project will be completed within six to eight weeks with the DER approval. He concluded by saying that the subject firm has established a good rapport with the County in the past; they understand the requirements of the project, and, they are well qualified. MOl( 052 fACE 303 l aOOK 052 PACE 304 March 25, 1980 Hearing no questions from the Board, Chairman Wenzel thanked Mr. Jain for his presentation. WILSON, MILLER, BARTON, SOlL & PEEK Hr. Cliff Schneider and Mr. Ray Miller, of Wilson, Miller, Barton, Soll & Peek, gave a presentation regarding the engineering consulting for the proposed East Naples Fire Hydrant District project. Mr. Schneider expressed his firm's desire to serve the County in this project and stated the various reasons he feels said firm is qualified. He noted the large number of available personnel, the past servir~ to the County and the expertise in the field of Wilson, Miller. Barton, 5011 & Peek. Referring to the location of the proposed project and the proximity to same from the headquarters of said firm along Airport Road, Mr. Schneider said that the location is optimum to all aspects of the field work necessary for the project. He covered the years of experience of said firm as well as the many recent projects they have completed that will aid his firm in regards to knowledge of the area, existing utilities, lines, etc. Mr. Schneider stated that his firm has developed a rapport with the various agencies that will need to have coordination regarding this particular project as well as the fact that same firm is experienced in working along existing roadways, and residential areas. He also stated that the firm is experienced in working with the City of Naples, and that this will be beneficial as coordination with the City will be needed to complete the proposed project. Mr. Schneider explained the many types of tests that will be necessary for the proposed project and the availability of laboratories, testing facilities, etc. of his firm. He promised a professional job that will be completed in a timely fashion, if his firm is awarded the contract for the proposed project. In answer to Commissioner Pistor, Mr. Schneider stated that he feels the project can be completed within 90 days, with a 30 day period for preliminary design work. Hearing no further questions, Chairman Wenzel thanked Messrs. Schneider and Miller for coming today to offer their presentation. * * * It was the consensus of the Board that the decision on which firm to choose for the consulting engineering work for the proposed project as presented above in the five presentations shall be considered at the r-"'" , ,,-... , [--, ImJ F". ] March 25. 1980 completion of the Agenda for today, so as to allow the Board members some time to con~ider the presentations.. *Later in the mAeting when the Agenda had been completed, County Engineer Barksdale supplied the members of the Board with ballots and instructed t~em to cast their respective votes in three separate ballots. one for each of the three places on a list beginning with their first choicft for the firm they wish to enter negotiations with for the consulting engineering work for the East Nr.ples Fire Hydrant District project. RESULTS OF BALLOTING RE CONSULTINr. ENGINEER FIRMS FOR THE EAST NAPLES FIRE HYDRANT DISTRICT PROJECT There were three ballots given and tallied for the three choices in order of preference for the firms with whom the BCC wishes to enter into negotiations with for a contrad for consulting engineer for the East Naples Fire Hydrant District project, and the following is the resultant list in said order: 1. CH2M H111 2. Wilsun, Miller, Barton, 5011 & Peek 3. Craven Thompson Assoc. Upon tallying the hallots in t~e cresence of Chief Deputy Clerk Harold Hall, Mr. Barksdale announced the above named firms in the order of preference for each of the three ballots.* Commissioner Archer moved. seconded by Commissioner Pistor and carried unanimously, that the results of the b~lloting stand as outlined above and that the Staff be authorized to enter into ne90tiations for a contract for engineerin~ con- sultant services re the East Naples Fire Hydrant District project. with the first name on the list. *Ballots are on file in the Clerk's Office. EXCAVATION PERMIT 159.99 PARADISE PARK, SECTION 6, T50S, R25E - APPROVED WITH STIPULATIONS Pursuant to County Engineer Barksdale's explanation regarding the request by the petitioner for a~ Excavation Permit for a lake to provide fill to be used on site and for utilization of same lake for a drainage retention area in conjunction with the develcp~nt of a mobile home 8O~K 052 fACE 305 ~.~-,~ . BODK 052 rACE 306 March 25, 1980 rental park to be located in Section 5, T50S, R26E, and his stating that the staff and the WMAB recommends approval of Permit 159.99 for Paradise Park with certain stipulations, Commissioner Archer moved that Excavation Permit '59.99 be approved with the following stipulations: 1. That a bottom elevation shall not exceed 0.0 MSL. 2. Since excavated material is to remain on site, the requirements for a bond shall be waived. 3. All applicable provisions of County Ordinance No. 73-12 shall be adhered to. 4. Applicant shall comply with any new administrative requirements'which become a part of the revised Excavation Ordinance. Commissioner Pistor seconded the motion and it carried unanimously 5/0. EXCAVATION PERMIT 159;100, RANDALL CRAWFORD, SECTION 31, T49S, R27E - APPROVED WITH STIPULATIONS Pursuant to County Engine:'r Barksdale explaining that the requested Excavation Permit '59.100 is for the purpose of generating fill to be used as an access road to property located in Section 31, T49S, R27E, just east of the landfill site, as requested by Randall Crawford, representing the Section 31 Association, Commissioner Archer moved to approve Excavation Permit 159.100 with the following stipulations as recommended by staff' and the WMAB: 1. No pumping shall be permitted. 2. Since excavated material is to remain on site requirements for a bond and permit fee shall be waived. 3. All applicable provisions of County Ordinance No. 73-12 shall be adhered to. 4. Applicant shall comply with any new administrative require- ments which become a part of the revised Excavation Ordinance. Commissioner Pistor seconded the motion and it carried unanimously 5/0. EXCAVATION PERMIT NO. 59.101 GARY J. LEWIS & FRANCIS H. LEWIS, SECTION 7, 149S. R26E - APPROVED WITH STIPULATIONS County Engineer Barksdale explained that Gary J. Lewis and Francis L. Lewis are requesting approval for Excavation Permit No. 59.101 for the purpose of creating a private pond. He said that approximately 1/2 of the fill material will remain on site for grade elevation purposes and the other 1/2 will be removed from the site. He said the subject property is jointly owned; made up of two lots; and the excavation will be located in the middle of both lots located in Section 7, T49S, R26E. r L~-:...:J J r-''''l " March 25, 1980 Commissioner Archer asked Mr. Barksdale if there was any problem concerning the easements between the two lots, and Mr. Barksdale stated that the easement is not between the lots, rather, it runs across the lots some- what further back from the property line. He explained that this easement is the type that may be vacated sImply by request and the signatures of the adjoining property owner and that it does not apply to the proposed excavation. Commissioner Archer moved, seconded by Commissioner Pistor and carried unanimously 5/0, that Excavaton Permit No. 59.101 be approved subject to the fOllowing stipulations as recommended by staff and the Wr~8: 1. No pumping shall be permitted. 2. For that portion of excavated material to be removed from the site, a bond shall be required. 3. All applicable provisions of County Ordinance No. 73-12 shall be adhered to. 4. Applicant shull comply with any new administrative requirements which become a part of the revised Excavation Ordinance. I I , I ,; f" " EXCAVATION PERMIT NO. 59.102, BEACH CLUB HOTEL GOLF COURSE, SECTION 33, T50S. R25E - APPROV~D WITH STIPULATIONS County Engineer Barksdale explained that Excavation Permit No. 59.102 is being requested by the Beach Club Hotel for two new lakes in the golf course at the notel , and an expansion of an existing lake to provide fill to reshape existing tees and 9reens, and that this will complete the ; expansion of the entire golf course. After stating that the property lies in Section 33, T50S, R25E, and that the permit request has been reviewed by staff and the WMAB, Mr. Barksdale stated that it is recommended that the BCC approve PermIt No. 59.102 subject to the following stipulations: 1. No pumping shall be permitted. 2. Since excavated material is to remain on site, requirements for a bond and permit fee shall be waived. 3. All applicable provisions of County Ordinance No. 73-12 shall be adhered to. 4. Applicant shall comply with any new adminIstrative require- ments which become a part of the revised Excavation Ordinance. Commissioner Archer moved, seconded by Commissioner Wimer and carried unanimously 5/0, that Excavation Permit No. 59.102 be approved subject to the above-mentioned stipulations. 80~K 052 fACE 307 ;;}.Jl;t~~~ &OOK 052 PACE308 March 25, 1980 EXCAV^TION PERMIT NO. 59.10~ CLEVELANO BLOCKER, SECTION 32, T46S, R29E - APPROVED WITH STIPULATIONS County Engineer Barksdale reported that a County Inspector locnted the subject. excavation whfch is situated in the Immokalee Area, Section 32, T46S, R2~E; it was disrovered that th~ owner of the property was not aware of the need for a permit; and upon 1I0t1ficl'.tion of same, he is now requesting an "after-the-fact" permit for said excavation. Mr. Barksdale noted that the subject excavation meets ail the requirements of the excavation ordin~nce in effect when the arrlicaticn was applied for and that all of the excavation material was used on site. Mr. ~arksdale stated that the staff and the WMAB have reviewed Mr. Blocker's appllc^tlon for the subject permit and that they recnmmend the Board approve Excavation Permit No. 59.103 with the followin~ stipulations: 1. No pumpin~ shall be permitted. 2. Since excavated material is to remain on site, the requirements for a bond and permit fee shall be waived. ,r 3. All applicable provisions of County Ordinance No. 73-12 shall be adhered to. 4. The applicant shall comply with any new administrative requirements which become a part of the revised Exc^vation Ordinance. Commissioner Brown moved, seconded by Commissioner Archer and carried unanimously 5/0, that Excavation Permit No. 59.103 be approved subject to the above stipulations. WATER WELL PE~~ITS NOS. 65.268A; 65.268B; 65.268C; AND 65.268D REQUESTED BY CH2M HILL FOR THE CITY OF MAPLES - APPROVED WITH STIPULATIONS County Engineer Barksdale explained that the firm of CHZM Hill is requesting the approval of four water well permits for various locations for the purpose of ccnductin9 a monitoring and pumping testing program for the City of N~ples. He stated that the various locations and the description! of each well is more fully detailed within the Executive Summary. Pursuant to Mr. Barksdale having stated that staff and the WMAB have reviewed the applications for the four water wells and have recommended app~oval " ", '-_.I (~ March 25, 1980 subject to certain stipulations, Commissioner Wimer moved, seconded by Commissioner Brown and carried unanimously 5/0, that Water Well Permits Nos. 65.268A, 65.268B. 65.268C and 65.2680 be approved subject to the fol- lowing stipulations: 1. That a copy of the driller's log shall be submitted to the County Engineer upon completion of the drilling operation. 2. A water analysis regarding the water quality shall be submitted to the County Engineer. 3. Results of test data shall be submitted to the County Engineer. 4. Wells shall be plugged and capped upon completion of the testing progr.'lm. WATER WELL PERMIT NO. 65.269, MISSIMER & ASSOC. FOR PELICAN BAY - APPROVED WITH STIPULATIONS Commissioner Brown moved, seconded by Commissioner Wimer and carried unanimously 5/0, that Water Well PermIt No. 65.269 for Pelican Bay as requested by Missimer & A~soc., to be located in Section 4, T49S, R25E, be approved with the fOllowing stipulations as recommended by staff and the WMAB: 1. That a copy of the driller's log shall be submitted to the County Engineer upon completion of the drilling operation. 2. A water analysis regarding water quality shall be submitted to the County Cengineer. 3. Results of test data shall be submitted to County Engineer 4. Wells shall be plugged and capped upon completion of the testing program. 5. For those test wells which are also proposed for production, new permits must be applied for prior to plaCing them into production. (More detailed description regarding water well within the Executive Summary} , WATER WELL PERMIT NO. 65.270, MISSIMER & ASSOC. FOR QUAIL CREEK TEST PROGRAM - APPROVED WITH STIPULATIONS Commissioner Brown moved, seconded by Commissioner Wimer and carried unanimously 5/0, that Water Well Permit No. 65.270 for Quail Creek Test Program as requested by Missimer & Assoc., to be located in Section 17, T49S, R26E, be approved with the following stipulations as recommended by staff and the WMAB: 1. That a copy of the driller's log shall be submitted to the County Engineer. 2. A water analysis regarding water quality shall be submitted to the County Engineer. 3. Results of test data shall be submitted to the County Engineer. BO~K 052 PACE 309 . . "!.. ;~,';~~.,.. BOOK 052 fACE 310 March 25, 1980 4. Wells shall be plugged and capped upon completion of the testing program. 5. For those test wells which are also proposed for production, new permits must be applied for prior to placing them into production. (More detailed description regnr'ding water well within the Executive Surrmary) WATER WELL PERMIT NO. 65.271 MISSIMER & ASSOC. FOR SHERWOOD PARK DEVELOP- MENT - APPROVED WITH STIPULATIONS Commissioner Brown moved, seconded by Commissioner Wimer and carried unanimously 5/0. that Water Well Permit No. 65.271 for Sherwood Park DevelopmP.nt, as requested by Missimer & Assoc. to be loceted in Section 34. T49S, R26E, be approved with the following stipulations as recommended by staff and the WMAB: 1. That a copy of the driller's log shall be submitted to the County Fngineer upon completion of the drilling operation. 2. A water analysis regarding water quality shall be sub- mitted to the County Engineer. 3. Results of test data shall be submitted to County Engineer. 4. Wells shall be plugged and capped upon completion of the testing program. 5. For those test wells which are also proposed for production, new permits must be applied for prior to placing them into production. (More fully defined description of water well within the Executive Summary.) WATER WELL PERMIT NO, 65.272 MISSIMER & ASSOC. FOR INVESCO, INC. AND CHARLES GUY TESTING PROGRAM - APPROVED WITH STIPULATIONS Commissioner Brown moved, seconded by Commissioner Wimer and carried unanimously 5/0, that Water Well Permit No. 65.272 for Invesco, Inc., and Charles Guy Testing Program, as requested by Missimer & Assoc., to be located in Section 4, T51S. R26E. be approved with the fOllowing stipulations as recommended by staff and the WMAB: 1. That a copy of the driller's log be submitted to the County Engineer upon completion of the drilling operation. 2. A water analysis regarding water quality shall be submitted to the County Engineer. 3. Results of test data shall be submitted to the County Engineer. 4. Wells shall be plugged and capped upon completion of the testing program. 5. For those test wells which are also proposed for production, new permits must be applied for prior to placing them into production. ['- ~" ,-_.. c::.:J L ...J r......-..-. ' ~ '-~~".'Lf~.":~:-' .~,~>',..j .'''r.~ I March 25. 1980 WATER WELL PERMITS FOR THE BIG CYPRESS BASIN BOARD/D.O.T. - APPROVED WITH STIPULATIONS County Engineer Clifford Barksdale stated that the Big Cypress Oasin Board has applied for the following water well permits in cooperation with the Florida nepartment of Transportation: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. PERMIT NUMBER 65.273 65.274 65.275 65.276 65.277 G5.278 LOCATION Section 3, T50S, R26E Section 6, T50S, R28E Section 5, T50S, R29E, Section 4, T50S, R30E Section 3, T50S, R31E Section 5, T50S, R35E He stated that the staff and the WMAB have reviewed the above applications and have recommended approval with the following stipulations: 1. That a copy of the driller's log shall be submitte~ to the County Engineer upon completion of the drilling operatio~. 2. A water analysis regarding water quality shall be submitted to the County Engineer. 3. Results of test data shall be submitted to Coun~ Engineer. 4. Wells shall be plugged and capped upon completion of the testing program. Commissioner Archer moved, seconded by Commissioner Brown and carried unanimously 5/0, that the above described water well permits (6) be ..approved with stipulations as indicated in the staff and WMAB's recommendations. ... CARNIVAL PERMIT '80.2 FOR NAPLES POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE - APPROVED Pursuant to Ordinance 75-11, Commissioner Archer moved. seconded by Commissioner Brown and carried unanimously 5/0, that Carnival Permit No. 80-2 re Petition C-80-2-C be approved for the Nctples Police Athletic League and that the surety bond be waived, re a carnival scheduled to be held at the Swamp Buggy Grounds on March 25-29, 1980. * * * * * ~ * &O~K 052 fACE 311 ., f' :~~ fl 1 l \ ~. .' ~ ii, " ~'" ,J~~~:~~~,i::',,~~\:~~.,:,(:::", ; "~':_..:.. r'--) .J [~~, March 25, 1980 RESOLUTION NO. 80-70 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT FOR COST OF ABATEMENT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE ON LOT 36. UNIT NO.1. PALM RIVER ESTATES - ADOPTED In accordance with Ordinance 76-14, Commissioner Archer moved, seconded by Commissioner Wimer and carried unanimously 5/0, that Resolution Ho. 80-70, providing for an assessment of costs incurred for abatement of . public nuisance on property owned by Joe Scean9ula, described as Lot 36. Unit No.1, Palm River Estates, be adopted. * * * * * * * * 6{)OK 052 PACE 313 (..:=J c:::J March 25, 1980 PESQlUTION NO. 80-71 AMENDING LEGAL DESCRIPTION CONTAINED IN RESOLUTION NO. 79-175 RE GOODLAND WATER - ADOPTED Pursuant to an explan~tion from Assistant County Attorney Pires regarding the need to amend Resolution No. 79-175 by amending the legal description therein, due to the determination that the acquisition of lands as described therein can be carried out by acquiri~g less property than is described within Resolution 79-175, C0mmissioner Pistor moved that Resolution No. 80-71, which will amend the legal description to the minimum necessary for the public purposes described in Resolution No. 79-175. be adopted. Commissioner Archer seconded the motion and it carried unanimously 5/0. * * * * "" * * * * * 1I00K 052 fACf315 (-=::I L. __J l4arch 25, 1980 ROUTINE BILLS - APPROVED FOR PAYMENT Commissioner Archer moved, seconded by Commissioner Pistor Ind carried unanimously 5/0, that the routine bills be approved for pay- ment IS witnessed by the following checks issued from March 19, 1980 through March 25, 1980, same having been processed following established procedures, with funds available: ACCOUNT BCC Payroll-CETA County Checks CHECK NO. 1307-1441 5721-6220 BUDGET AMENDMENT NO. 80-66 FOR PURCHASE OF COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT FOR THE COUNTY STOCKADE - APPROVED IN THE AI-1QUNT OF $6,101 Pursuant to Fiscal Officer Hall explaining that Budget Amendment No. 80-66 reflects action previously taken by the Board on August 28. 1980 regarding the purchase of communication equipment for the County Stockade, Commissioner Archer moved, seconded by Commissioner Brown and carried unanimously 5/0, that Budget Amendment No. 80-66 be approved in the amount of $6,101. ." * I I , i ." ." * * ." BOOK 052 PACE3j.7 .. t.~.:x.., f.=J __.1 r~,"""'" .~ March 25, 1980 BUDGET AMENDMENT NO. 80-67 FOR THE PURCHASE OF TECHNICAL REPORT RE THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR THE PLANNrNG DEPARTMENT - APPROVED IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,200 Commissioner Archer moved, seconded by Commissioner Brown and carried unanimously 5/0, that Budget Amendment No. 80-67, transferring funds for the purchase of 100 copies of the Technical Report of the Comprehensive Plan for the Planning Department be approved in the amount of $1,200. I I, i I I I I BOARD OF COUNTY" CONMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BUDGET AI1ENDt1ENT . "@ Requires' Board Approval . D Do'e's' Not: Require Boarc1 Approval . . . . ,..........."" (tranSfer wi thin bbjeCI: cod. rami . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ...... . .. '. . ..' . FUND, GENERll..L DESCRIPTION: , DEP,'r.: . : . : ". PLANNING DEPARTMENT ~ Transfer of funds to PUblications to purchase ,100 copies of the Technical Report of the Cpmprehensiv~ Plan.' PREVIOUSLY APPROVED BY THE BOARD MARCH 11, 1980 ,.,. TO (Increase): Publications .001-515-1-l6-11-030~511 ~ 1,200 FROM (Source of Funds~: Contingencies 001~519-1-00-05-010r990 $ 1,200 .' = l~~: .ir. F:i.scill O;1ic:cr:1 BOrtrd of County Co:nm. 1\Pprov~lt1/~lj 1\pproval: DlIte, _ ,/~.r Date: March ~5, 1980 . No. 80-6 DUDGE? 1\; J- l,./.....f1; OIS'.l'ruDllTIClN: ' .g Ue>anl nec:e>ccls COcigin1l1) ~ ~!Gc^l Officer ~ Dephrtm~ntCs) hffcctc~ . 'illlc:ce>unting Dcpllrtr.l,nt; D Purchasing et:quipment Only) D Jlu(1!Jr.t 1\nhlYIlt: _ . _ .. _ _ 80~K 052 PACE 319 ~: tf ;, ,. /. &OOK 052 PACE 320 BUDGET AMENDMENT NO. 80-68 FOR THE COST OF CONSULTANTS RE COUNTY ENERGY CONSERVATION PROGRAM - APPROVED IN THE AMOUNT Of $6.250 March 25, 1980 Commissioner Archer moved, seconded by Commissioner Brown and carried unanimously 5/0, that Budget Amendment No. 80-68, transferring funds for the purchase of services of two consultants re the Collier County Energy Conservation Program, be approved in the amount of $6,250, BOARD OF COUNTY.CO~~ISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BUDGET AMENDMENT , IiJI Requires Board Approval . D Do'e's' Not. Require Doard Approval . (transfer within bbject. code range) . ................ ................. ...... . .. .. . ... FUND GEN~RA~.~~ . , . , . . DEP.T.: , ~.UN:rY. mNAGER DESCRIPTION: T,o transferfurids from Contingencies ,for. the 'purchase of service of two consulting engineers ~orthe Coun~y Complex Energy Conservatio Program.. " PREVIOUSLY APPROVED BY THE BOARD MARCH 11, l~BO. TO (Increase): Qt~er Professional Fees . . 001-512-1-10-Q3-030-319-89002 '$ 6,250 FROM (Source ot Funds) : Contingencies 001-519-1-00-05-010-990 $ 6,250 .' County H t!J . Data: 1.z,1-~ Onto: DXS'1'lUDUTi:oN, ' .~. JlonX'(l' Recor(ls O.dgilli\l) FIscal Officer n._...."'.."..(~\ 1\f'f"r:..,.rt Fiscal Appro Of~' ce ? Oonrd of County Co:nm. : ',}/ J\pproval : I t- .. r s.'" Dntc: March 25, 198() DUDGE'!' J\~' No. 80-68 . 'il Accounting f)eol>nX't.\ll~t. D Purchnuing Cl:q\lip.-aent. Only) r7 ntl(ln...t-. 1\nalvst r-....! ,--., r----" ~";.'i""",'ji!!.,,tt;,'~',"'''i ~----".~, ,q'~~~'--"';'~~~I r- I I .,_,) 't::J -', :~.: , March 25. 1980 BUDGET AMENDMENT NO. 80-69 TO COVER COST OF PAVING 40 PARKING SPACES AT COUNTY COMPLEX - APPROVED IN THE AMOUNT OF $10,000 Commissioner Archer moved, seconded by Commissioner Brown and carried unln mous y 5/0, that Budget Amendment No. 80-69, covering the cost of the paving of 40 additional parking spaces at the County Complex be approved in the amount of $10,000. BOARD OF COUNTY CO}~ISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BUD GET A MEN D MEN T . ~ Requires Board Approval , D Do'e's' Not Require Board AnProval ,,' (transfer within bbject code ,range) '" .. .... ....... ...... . .. . . '" .. . FUND CAPIT~ IMPROVEMENT .TRU!)T 1977 _ DEPT.' OTHER GENERAL ADHINJSTRATIVE DESCRIPTION: To ~ransfer funds from Contingencies to cover the cost of paving '40 additional parking spaces. PREVIOUSLY APPROVED BY THE BOARD FEBRUARY 26, 1980. ". TO (Increase): , Improvements other than Bldgs. 302-519 -1-00-0 5-01 0-630-21001 $ 10,00 FROM (Source of Funds): Contingencies 302-519-1-00-05-010-990 $ 10 00 County Mgr/Oiv. Dir. Fiscal ?1f~cer Approval: 1\PprtJ,"~:, L.f.. Date: Dat,f{{~!~ ~_j1J, . I DXSTIUnU'l'IO:>h .~ nNarc' RQc<>r<ls (Origiul\l> FlnC:l\l Officl'r ....._.. ....._...._.. 1-\ ""....._.._.. Roard of County Comm. nUDGET 1\NW. J\P!?rova1: Dntc: llarch 25, 1980 No. 80-69 . illlccounting DcpartlllPl\t ~ ~~~:~~s~~~,~~~ipm.nt Only) 80JK 052 PACE321 aoox 052 PAcE 322 March 25, 1980 BUDGET AMENDMENT NO. 80-70 FOR EXPENSES FOR INSTALLATION CF DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS TO THE NORTH OF PRICE STREET IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT - APPROVED IN THE AMOUNT OF $11.000 Commissioner Archer moved, seconded by Commissioner Brown and carried unanimously 5/0, that Budget Amendment No. 80-70, transferring funds to cover expenses incurred for the installation of drainage improvements to the north of Price Street Improvement District, be approved in the amount of $11,000; BOARD-OF COUNTY.COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BUDGET AI1ENDMENT . t;Y ReCJuires Board Approval . D Do'e's No"t Require Board Approval . . ("transfer within bbject code range) . . .. . ...................... .............................. ........... .. ... .... .. ..... FUND WATER .MANAGEMENT . DEPT.: . WATE'tt: /oj,MiAGEMENT DESCRIPTION: ' Transfer of funds to Improvements other than Buildings to cover expenses incurred for the installation of drainage improvements to the nor~ of Price Street .Improvement District. PREVIOUSLY APPROVED BX THE BOARD F~BRUARY 12, ,'1980. TO (Increase): Improvements other than Buildings 110-537-1-12-57-010-630 $ 11,000 FROM (Source of Funds) : -. Engineering Fees 110-537~1-12-57-010-315 $ 11,000 lo~.isclll O.ffJ.' celi Iloard of County Comm. BUDGET 1\1'\!';: Appr IV :1 -L ' Al'J?rovnl: ~~ , Dato . . Ditto: l!arch 25' 1980' No. 80-70 O:rSTlUDUTIOlh ' '~nOllnl Rtlc<>rc1s Cortginlll) . D lIcconnt:ing Oc-pllrtm!ml:. Fiscal Officer D Pllrchl1dng (l-:qu1pilltmt Only) Detp.!lrtmenl:Cs) lIffoctc!c't a nuc10et lInlllyst [..::=J ...J r -. .,}..:,:;;, March 25~ 1980 BUDGET AMENDMENT NO. 80-71 TO CONTRACT WITH ENGINEERING COMPArlY RE BAYVIEW PARK AND BOAT RAMP . APPROVED IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,200 Pursuant to Fiscal Officer Hall explaining that the funds being transferred within BudgqtAmendment No. 80-71 for contracting with an Engineering firm re plans and specifications for Bayview Park and Boat Ramp, will be reimbursed through grant money, Commissioner Wimer moved, seconded by Commissioner Pistor and carried unanimously 5/0, that Budget Amendment No. 80-71 be approved in the amount of $1,200. BOARD OF COUNTY CO~~ISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BUD GET A MEN D MEN T . i!i1 Requires Poard Approval . D Oo'e's' Not Require Board Approval ",. , , . . . , . . . (transfer within object:. code range' ..... . I ......... ...... . .. . . ... .. . FUND GE~ERAL: , DEP.T.: .~A~R~:~ ,~ECREATION .- ADMIN DESCRIPTION: T.ransfor of funds to contract with engineering company to prepare construction plans aryd specifications for Bayview Park boat ramp. This money will be reimbursed through grant money. ~. ~ . I TO (Increase): Parks , Rec - Admin Contracted' Services 001-572-1-15-87-010-349 $ 1,200 -. , . FROM (Source of Funds): Parks & Rec - Recreation Contracted Services 001-572-1-15-87-030-349 $ 1,200 .' County ,.1 ~a Fiscal O.ffic~l" ApprOVe 1: ~:[, C), Date: l . ,.'v\'-S a Drs'.rR.n3tr.rIO~h ' 'flII011rr.l Jlccorr.1s COriginnl) ~ Yiscal Offic~r 2:jr Dep~rtment(s) ^ffccted Doard of County Cornm. BUDGET AMP. J\pprovlll: Dal:e: March 25, 1980 No. BO-71 / " , 'D ^cco\lnt:lng Depllt'bn1ml: 2:7 purchusing (Equipment Only) L:7 nudget ~n~lyst BeaK 052 pm 323 ': '~" , ;~:; 'trr,' ".j ,~~ ........-.- . ,- .; ~ I , aoox 052 ,1CE 324 March 25, 1980 BUDGET AMENDMENT NO. 80-72 FOR PROCESSING EMPLOYEE ARREST RECORDS FOR OCHOPEE FIRE CONTROL DISTRICT - APPROVED IN THE AMOUNT OF $24 Fiscal Officer Hall explained that Budget Amendment No. 80-72 for proce~sing of arrest records of employees of Ochopee Fire Control District as mandated by the State is actually tranSferring funds to more accurately reflect expenditures within said budge". Commissioner Wimer moved, secondp.d by Commissioner Pistor and carried unanimously 5/0, that Budget Amendment No. 80-72 be approved in the amount of $24. J BOARD OF COUNTX.CO~~ISSIONEnS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORID1\. , '@ Requires Board Approval . D Do'es' Not Require Doard Approval ' Ctrunsfer within bbjec~ code range) . . . . ................ ......................... .. . ... ;. BUD GET A 11 END 11 E N T FUNO:OLtI'E~ COUNTY ,FIRE CONT~OL .QJ;ST , DEP.T.: . OCtIOJ?EE .l:'IRE CONTRQ,L' DESCRIPTION: T~ansfer of funds to cover cost of procesaingof arrest records of employees as mandated by t~e State. TO (Increase): Other Misc. Expense' 121-522-1-13-28-040_499 $ 24 " ,! -. I i .1 :1 . FROM (Source of Funds) : R & M - Comm. Equip. Contr.121-522~1-13-28-040_465 $ 24 Fisca, 1 Officf?lY) 1\ppro n1{J;/'-"eY Dnt~ , ,,/_\.:-:v UISTrUDu:r.ttlN: . '~IO&rcl R<<eorclf; COr.tgitll\l) Fl.senl Off.te~r , . DeJ"l"rtm~nt:(!,) 71ffror-.'-" , - Donrcl of County Coonrn. BUDGET J\Nl::. J\pprovlIl: Date: .. rch 2S. 1980 No. 80-72 , 'il 1\ccountinC) Ocpnrt.I'll1!'l'lt:. "T7 1'1lrchnuin9 C~:quipmtrnt Only) ~ "'1f''''''~. "n;,'"r~''' ' I. !, I l ;~~ :~ hi ~ r-=:J [":7] March 25, 1990 BUDGET AMENDMENT NO. 80-73 REFLECTING THE LINE ITEM FOR WHICH MOTOR POOL REIMBURSEMENTS FOR THE NAPLES WILDERNESS ALTERNATIVE PROGRAM SHOULD BE CHARGED - APPROVED IN THE AMOUNT OF $250 Commissioner Archer moved, seconded by Commissioner Pistor and carried unanimously 5/0, that Budget Amendment No. 90-73 transferring funds to Motor Pool Reimbursement to more accurately reflect the line item to which the expenditures should be charged, be approved in the amount of $250. ~ ' BOARD OF COUNTY CO}~ISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BUD GET A M E tl D 11 E N T '/ii}' Requires Board Approval . D D"o.es' Not Require Board Approval o .... 0 . . , . , . . .. . , . . (transfer within object colIe rangE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ...... . .. . .' . '" FUND GENI;:RAL.:', . . . . . 0 DEP,T.: N1\PJ,ES: WILDERNESS AI,'1". PROf ~ DESCRIPTION: T~ansfer of funds to Motor Pool Reimbursement to more accurateJ reflect the line item to whicp ~he expen~itures should be charged. TO (Increase): Motor Pool Reimbursement 001-523-3-14-32-020-403 $ 250 , FROM (Source of Funds): , . Conununications 001-523-3~14-32-020-4l0 $ 250 .' Bonrcl of County Co:nm. DUDGE'.i', lIpproval: Dilte, Dnt:e:rtarch 25,1980. No. 80-7 OISTIUllUT10N: ' '~lOllt"<1 TtAc:orc15 (odgilllll) f'iscnl Officer Depbt"tment(s) ^tlc:c:tc:d oa ^ccollnt:in9 Dt'partl\)1ml: D X'urchn!#lng n:q\aip..ltl!nt. Only) ;-7 nua~et ^nulyst 6O:iK 052 rACE' 325 ~O~~~ March 25, 1980 CERTIFICATE OF COUNTY CANVASSERS RE PRESIDENTIAL PREFERENCE PRIMARY & SPECIAL ELECTION ON 3/11/80 - ACCEPTED FOR THE RECORD The certificate of County Canvassers regarding the March II, 1980 Presidential Primary and Special Election, submitted by Elections Supervisor Edna Santa was accepted and filed for the record with the Clerk. * * * * * * * * * . c::J ..J March 25, 1980 RIGHT-OF-WAY CERTIFICATE RE MARCO WATER/SEWER PROJECT AUTHORIZED FOR EXECUTION BY THE CHAIRMAN AND FORWARDED TO FMHA As requested by County Attorney Pickworth, Commissioner Pfstor moved that the Right-of-Way Certificate regarding the FmHA financed Marco Waterl Sewer project be authorized for the Chairman's signature and that said certificate be forwarded to the FmHA. Commissioner Archer seconded the motion and it carried unanimously 5/0. * * * * * * * * * &O~K 052 PACE 341 L:l L__.J [=:J March 25, 1980 COMMISSIONERS AND STAFF ASSOCIATED WITH DEVELOPMENT OF THE NATIONAL DISASTER PLAN AUTHORIZED TO ATTEND THE NATIONAL HURRICANE CONFERENCE IN ORLANDO 4/23 - 4/25/80 Commissioner Archer stated that he feels that all of the Commissioners and any staff member that has been involved with the development of the National Disaster Plan that wish to attend should have the opportunity to accept the Governor's invitation to attend the National Hurricane Con- ference on April 23 - 25, 1980 in Orlando. He stated that Mr. Hafner, Public Safety Administrator, has also expressed a desire to attend. Commissioner Archer so moved, seconded by Commissioner Wimer, and the motion to authorize the attendance of said conference by interested Commissioners and staff members carried unanimously 5/0. PETITION SUPPORTING A SENIOR CITIZEN CENTER IN THE NAPLES AREA - ACCEPTED FOR THE RECORD Following a brief discussion regarding the action taken earlier in the meeting regarding the request for a Senior Citizen Center in the County Complex and the wording in a four page petition supporting a multi- purpose Senior Citizen Center to be built in the Naples Area, Commissioner Brown moved, seconded by Commissioner Wimer and carried unanimously 5/0, that the four page petition supporting a multi-purpose Senior Citizen Center to be built in the Naples Area be accepted for the record and filed with the Clerk. ~ Chairman Wenzel directed the staff to look into the matter regarding said center being built at the County Complex and report back as soon as possible. l RESOLUTION NO. 80-72 REQUESTING FEDERAL ASSISTANCE IN FUNDING THE REPAIR OF NAPLES/IMMOKALEE HIGHWAY (C-846) - ADOPTED Pursuant to Commissioner Brown explaining that he has directed letters to Florida's Congressional Delegation regarding the need for Federal Assist- ance for the repair of the "Farm to Market" Roadway (C-846), and requesting their assistance in locating said funds. Commissioner Brown moved, seconded by Commissioner Wimer and carried unanimously 5/0. that Resolution No. 80-72 requesting assistance in said funding be adopted. BOOK 052 PACE '343 ...J ,:' ,'.';7,1. _ -... ~ :-,~,..':-.' ...-.!-_-.-.... .,...._....;... ._. ..... .........-. ),It ,I: I' &OOX 052 PACE 326 March 25. 1980 BUDGET AMENDMENT NO. 80-74 REFLECTING EXPENDITURE FOR TELEPHONE ANSWERING DEVICE AT THE GOLDEN GATE COMMUNITY CENTER - APPROVED IN THE AMOUNT OF $166 \ Respondfng to Commissioner Archer's query, Fiscal Officer Hall explained that Budget Amendment No. 80-74 reflected the proper object code from which expenditures for a telephone answering service is to be charged within the Golden Gate Community Center's budget. Commfssioner Archer moved, seconded by Commissioner Pistor and carried unanimously 5/0, that Budget Amendment No. 80-74 be approved in the amount of $166. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BUDGET AMENDMENT '. @ Requires Board Approval ' D D'o'e's' Not Require Board Approval (transfer within bbject code range) . I . .. ............ ............. ............................................... ,,,,,,,,,, . ,FUND GOLDE~ GAti. O~ERATIN.G . DEP.T.: . : . :Gql!Q~~ GATE COMM.UNITY CENTER -j DESCRIPTION: Transfer of funds to Communications to more accurately reflect those line items to which expenditures should be charged.' This is for a telephone answering deyice previously charged to object code 410 leaving inauffici~nt funds' for telephone service. TO (Increase): Communications 148-572-1-15-88-010-410 $ 166 ~. FROM (Source of Funds): Contingency l48-572-1-1~-88-010-990 $ 166 .' ~unt~JI1JJr/q~. Dir. )lisenl ('~Jr~~.. Approv Date: ""1-/1-8 () Date: offJ"lerL Board of County Comm. <J it pproval: . ')..(. SIl Date: r~rch 25' 1980' BUDGET J\Nr~N! DISTlUBllTION: . . No. 80~74 Board Rec('l1:c1s (Original) Fiscal Officer ~-~~._.~~,.\ ~'~~~~~A , 'il lIccounl:ln9 O.pllrl:ment ~ ~~;~~~s~~~h~~ipmfmt. on~y_) r-'" ..--, [~ J [:=I March 25. 1980 APPOINTMENT TO GOLDEN-GATE COMMUNITY CENTER ADVISORY BOARD - DEFERRED The appointment to the Golden Gate Community Center Advisory Board was deferred at Commissioner Archer's request. He explained that he'has a meeting with the Golden Gate Community Center Advisory Board and that he is hopeful that this matter will be settled within the next two weeks. ~. l LETTER AUTHORIZED FOR CHAIRMAN'S SIGNATURE TO BE SENT TO THE FMHA REGARDING THE RESULTS OF TIlE MARCH 18, 1980 REFERENDUM RE MARCO WATER/SEWER DISTRICT Utility Director Irving Berzon requested that the Board authorize a letter to be prepared for the Chairman's signature that is to be sent to Farmer's Home Administration regarding the results of the March 18, 1980 referendum re the Marco Water/Sewer District's construction of a sewer collection system and the subsequent finanCing by the FmHA. Commissioner Archer moved, seconded by Commissioner Pistor and carried unanimously 5/0, that the letter described above be authorized for the Chairman's signature. ,/i J REV. LAWSON AND MARY CHENERY APPOINTED AS COLLIER COUNTY REPRESENTATIVES RE GOVERNOR'S CONFERENCE ON AGING Administrative Aide to the Board Mary Morgan stated that she has had three people offer to serve as County Representatives to the Governor's ~' Conference on Aging; Reverend Lawson, Mary Chenery, and Virginia Miller. After a brief discussion, Commissioner Wimer moved, seconded by Commissioner 8rown and carried unanimously 5/0, that Reverend Lawson and Mary Chenery be appointed to serve the County as representatives re the Governor's Conference on Aging. CERTIFICATES OF CORRECTION TO TAX ROLLS AUTHORIZED FOR CHAIRMAN'S SIGNATURE AS PRESENTED BY THE PROPERTY APPRAISER Commissioner Archer moved, seconded by Commissioner Pistor and carried unanimously 5/0. that the following Certificates for Correction on the Tax Rolls be approved and that the Chairman be authorized to Sign same: 1976 TAX ROLL NO. DATE 333 3/20/80 1977 TAX ROLL 425 3/20/80 1978 TAX ROLL 571 - 574 eoDK 052 PACE 327 3/20/80