Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Backup Documents 04/23/2019 Item #14B1
ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS CHECKLIST & ROUTING SLIP TO ACCOMPANY ALL ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS SENT TO 148 THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OFFICE FOR SIGNATURE Print on pink paper. Attach to original document. The completed routing slip and original documents are to be forwarded to the County Attorney Office at the time the item is placed on the agenda. All completed routing slips and original documents must be received in the County Attorney Office no later than Monday preceding the Board meeting. **NEW** ROUTING SLIP Complete routing lines #1 through #2 as appropriate for additional signatures, dates, and/or information needed. If the document is already complete with the ,. a.,,.., ., r..o rh...,,..6 ..,,,r;,,.. �;nPC {1l thrnnA 4 co—nlete the checklist_ and forward to the Countv Attomev Office. GXLG L1V11 Vl u1G l.11alllllall 31r,1--, ua u.. ...... u.__ ..._ _.... Route to Addressees (List in routing order) .-.-.. .. _ ._.___ _.. _, _�.__ Office Initials Date 1. 94+Agenda Item Number Applicable) 2. Does the document require the chairman's original signatuk STAMP OK 14B1 3. County Attorney Office County Attorney Office JAB NA 4. BCC Office Board of County Commissioners 5skisIg 1 5. Minutes and Records Clerk of Court's Office JAB C S ' 3"do � PRIMARY CONTACT 11vrUnIVIAriull Normally the primary c fact is the person who created/prepared the Executive Summary. Primary contact information is needed in the event one of the ff f AA; ' I ; in information addressees above, ma"ecu to Name of Prirna6 Staff I Contact / Department contact sta or a t►ona or miss Debrah Forester CRA 239-331-3266 Agenda Date Item was 94+Agenda Item Number Applicable) Ap roved by the BCC Does the document require the chairman's original signatuk STAMP OK 14B1 Type of Document }3-� Number of Original NA Attached CRA Resolution (14B1 Documents Attached 1 PO number or account n/a JAB number if document is signed by the Chairman, with the exception of most letters, must be reviewed and signed to be recorded by the Office of the Coup Attorney. I: Forms/ County Forms/ BCC Forms/ Original Documents Routing Slip WWS Original 9.03.04, Revised 1.26.05, Revised 2.24.05; Revised 11/30/12 Initial the Yes column or mark "N/A" in the Not Applicable column, whichever is Yes N/A (Not appropriate. = Initial Applicable) 1. Does the document require the chairman's original signatuk STAMP OK 2. Does the document need to be sent to another agency for addit al-signa es? If yes, NA provide the Contact Information(Name; Agency; Address; Phone on an attached sheet. 3. Original document has been signed/initialed for legal sufficiency. (All documents to be JAB signed by the Chairman, with the exception of most letters, must be reviewed and signed by the Office of the Coup Attorney. 4. All handwritten strike -through and revisions have been initialed by the County Attorney's NA Office and all other parties except the BCC Chairman and the Clerk to the Board 5. The Chairman's signature line date has been entered as the date of BCC approval of the JAB document or the final negotiated contract date whichever is applicable. 6. "Sign here" tabs are placed on the appropriate pages indicating where the Chairman's JAB signature and initials are required. In most cases (some contracts are an exception), the original document and this routing slip NA 7. should be provided to the County Attorney Oft ice at the time the item is input into SIRE. Some documents are time sensitive and requirz forwarding to Tallahassee within a certain time frame or the BCC's actions are nullified. Be aware of your deadlines! 8. The document was approved by the BCC on 4/9/19 and all changes made during the JAB meeting have been incorporated in the attached document. The County Attorney's Office has reviewed the changes, if a licable.= IF 9. Initials of attorney verifying that the attached document is the version approved by AB the BCC, all changes directed by the BCC have been made, and the document is ready for the Chairman's signature. _17 I: Forms/ County Forms/ BCC Forms/ Original Documents Routing Slip WWS Original 9.03.04, Revised 1.26.05, Revised 2.24.05; Revised 11/30/12 14B 1 CRA RESOLUTION NO. 2019-74 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, ACTING EX -OFFICIO AS THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE COLLIER COUNTY COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE COLLIER COUNTY COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT PLAN PURSUANT TO THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT ACT OF 1969, CHAPTER 163, PART III, FLORIDA STATUTES; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida enacted the Community Redevelopment Act of 1969, which is presently codified in Part III of Chapter 163, Florida Statutes (the "Act"); and WHEREAS, Resolution No. 2000-82 declared the need for a Community Redevelopment Agency and authorized the preparation of a Redevelopment Plan for the Bayshore Gateway study area; and WHEREAS, the Board, by its approval of Resolution No. 2000-83 established the Board of County Commissioners as the Community Redevelopment Agency to carry out redevelopment activities; and WHEREAS, the Board, by its approval of Resolution No. 2000-181 adopted the Community Redevelopment Plan; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has not approved an overall update to amend the Community Redevelopment Plan since the adoption of Resolution No. 2000-181; and WHEREAS, Section 163.361 of Florida Statutes authorizes and provides the procedure for modification of community redevelopment plans; and WHEREAS, The Community Redevelopment Agency hereby provides recommendation that it is desirable and necessary to amend the Community Redevelopment Plan as contemplated herein to further the community redevelopment purposes; and WHEREAS, the Collier County Planning Commission ("Local Planning Agency") conducted a formal review at a public hearing on March 21, 2019 and submitted its recommendations to the Community Redevelopment Agency; and WHEREAS, on March 26, 2019, pursuant to Section 163.361, Florida Statutes, the Community Redevelopment Agency provided notice and conducted a public meeting to receive comment on the proposed modification; and MIN 14B WHEREAS, the public meeting was continued to April 9, 2019 and further continued to April 23, 2019, where it was determined that the proposed extension for the term of the tax increment financing for the Bayshore Gateway Triangle area was not needed at this time and that an extension of the term of tax increment financing for the Immokalee area may be considered in the future; and WHEREAS, having received public comment as required by Section 163.361, the Community Redevelopment Agency recommends that the Board approve and adopt the amendment to the Community Redevelopment Plan as provided herein. NOW, THEREFORE, IN REGULAR SESSION DULY ASSEMBLED ON THIS 23rd DAY OF APRIL 2019 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COLLIER COUNTY COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; that: The Collier County Community Redevelopment Plan (Attachment "A") meets the requirements of Section 163.360, Florida Statutes, and II. That the Community Redevelopment Agency recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve and adopt the amendment to the Collier County Community Redevelopment Area Plan as provided herein. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its adoption. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting ex -officio as the governing board of the Collier County Redevelopment Agency, this Z.3 ytA, day of � 2019, after motion, second and majority vote favoring same. ATTEST: CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK Y MUWC"°.` PUTTY E Attest as t Ghai :signa►ture 0111y. Approved as to form and legality: \ aal Je er A. Belpe p� Assistant County Attorney !� 1` 2 COLLIER COUNTY COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: 4iiw 14�& DONNA FIALA Co - Chairman 1 NO] Attachment A AMENDMENT—MAY 2019 COLLIER COUNTY COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT PLAN BAYS HO RE/GATEWAY TRIANGLE Community Redevelopment Area 16 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA .Bayshorc Beautification MSTU Haldeman Crcek MSTU Adopted June 13, 2000 First Amendment: May 2019 IMMOKALEE Community Redevelopment Area Collier County Community Redevelopment Agency Nall, EE LK i The Place to Call Home I t i IJ 1,111 �I.}F 1 9 l �` k •ba. �1. A%1 Avi! F .I x.-) � I t rt 14tRH trt �+.vjn �... F C � � t wiwlb t r I t r 2 Qr � II ,i'Ift�,r`�i_i,�� kaa �& A� i } dAL r I YY !L_A, 4.JY0 41A>L d= � ty 1yOk A.ay �Ufd! PN A - r A' tr i J w11 ¢,4 x C3 Adopted June 13, 2000 First Amendment: May 2019 IMMOKALEE Community Redevelopment Area Collier County Community Redevelopment Agency Nall, EE LK i The Place to Call Home I i Collier County Redevelopment Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE SECTION 1 PLAN OVERVIEW SECTION 1.1 INTRODUCTION 1 SECTION 1.2 FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF BLIGHT 3 SECTION 1.3 CONSISTENCY WITH THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN 4 SECTION 1.4 CONFORMANCE WITH STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS 5 SECTION 1.5 THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 7 SECTION 1.6 DURATION, MODIFICATION AND SEVERABILITY OF PLAN 9 SECTION 2 FINANCIAL PLAN SECTION 2.1 FUNDING SOURCES 10 SECTION 2.2 OTHER FUNDING SOURCES 11 SECTION 3 NEIGHBORHOOD IMPACT ELEMENT 12 SECTION 4 IMMOKALEE REDEVELOPMENT AREA PLAN SECTION 4.1 INTRODUCTION 13 SECTION 4.2 FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF BLIGHT 15 SECTION 4.3 CONSISTENCY WITH THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN 19 SECTION 4.4 COMMUNITY OBJECTIVES 26 SECTION 4.5 REDEVELOPMENT AREA CHARACTERISTICS AND ANALYSIS 28 SECTION 4.6 INFRASTRUCTURE NEEDS ASSESSMENT 31 SECTION 4.7 REDEVELOPMENT GOALS 35 SECTION 4.8 PHASE I - REDEVELOPMENT PLAN 35 SECTION 4.9 FUTURE PHASES 39 SECTION 4.10 NEIGHBORHOOD IMPACT STATEMENT 41 SECTION 4.10 PROGRAM OF PUBLIC EXPENDITURES 42 SECTION 4.11 VALUATION 47 SECTION 5 BAYSHOREIGATEWAY REDEVELOPMENT AREA PLAN 5.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5-E-1 5.01 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5-E-1 5.02 GOALS 5-E-1 5.03 CONCEPTUAL PLAN DIAGRAM 5-E-4 5.04 CHARACTER AREAS 5-E-7 5.05 FOCUS OF REDEVELOPMENT 5-E-9 5.06 FUNDING, PROJECTS & INITIATIVES 5-E-10 5.07 2000 & 2019 PLAN COMPARISON 5-E-14 5.1 INTRODUCTION 5-1-1 5.1.1 VISION 5-1-1 5.1.2 PROCESS 5-1-1 5.1.3 PLAN ORGANIZATION 5-1-1 5.2 BACKGROUND 5-2-1 5.2.1 CREATION OF A CRA AREA 5-2-1 5.2.2 2000 REDEVELOPMENT PLAN GOALS AND PROJECTS 5.2.3 BAYS HORE/GATEWAY TRIANGLE CRA 2018 PERSPECTIVE 5.3 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 5.3.1 CONCEPTUAL PLAN DIAGRAM 5.3.2 LAND USE & URBAN DESIGN 5.3.3 PUBLIC SPACE, PARKS, & OPEN SPACE 5.3.4 DEVELOPMENT 5.3.5 TRANSPORTATION, CONNECTIVITY, & WALKABILITY 5.3.6 INFRASTRUCTURE 5.3.7 PROCESS 5.3.8 CHARACTER AREAS 5.4 PRIORITIZATION PLAN 5.4.1 PRIORITIZATION OF PROJECTS & INITIATIVES 5.4.2 FINANCING PLANNING 5.4.3 PROJECTS & INITIATIVES PRIORITIZATION 5.4.4 COORDINATION & PARTNERSHIPS 5.5 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 5.5.1 OVERVIEW OF RELEVANT STATUTES 5.5.2 CONSISTENCY WITH THE COUNTY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 5.5.3 ACQUISITION, DEMOLITION/CLEARANCE, & IMPROVEMENT 5.5.4 ZONING & COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CHANGES 5.5.5 LAND USE, DENSITIES & BUILDING REQUIREMENTS 5.5.6 NEIGHBORHOOD IMPACT 5.5.7 SAFEGUARDS, CONTROLS, RESTRICTIONS & ASSURANCES 5.6 TAX INCREMENT & MSTU ESTIMATES 5.6.1 TAX INCREMENT FINANCING 5.6.2 MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING UNITS(MSTUS) 5.6.3 UNDERLYING ASSUMPTIONS SECTION 6 RELOCATION PROCEDURES FIGURES FIGURES 1 COLLIER COUNTY MAP- 2004 FIGURES 2 IMMOKALEE REDEVELOPMENT AREA BOUNDARIES- 2004 FIGURES 3 IMMOKALEE FUTURE LAND USE MAP FIGURES 4 IMMOKALEE SUBAREAS APPENDIX Appendix A Resolutions and Trust Fund Ordinance 148 5-2-1 5-2-9 5-3-1 5-3-2 5-3-7 5-3-26 5-3-31 5-3-42 5-3-59 5-3-66 5-3-67 5-4-1 5-4-1 5-4-1 5-4-5 5-4-17 5-5-1 5-5-1 5-5-1 5-5-1 5-5-1 5-5-1 5-5-5 5-5-5 5-6-1 5-6-1 5-6-2 5-6-12 102 2 14 24 36 i 14B 1 2000-82- ESTABLISHMENT OF CRA AREA AND FINDING OF NECESSITY AND BLIGHTED CONDITIONS REPORT 2000 -83 -ESTABLISHING THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY III, 2000-181- ADOPTION OF 2000 CRA PLAN IV. 2004-179- EXPANDING IMMOKALEE REDEVELOPMENT AREA BOUNDARY V. 2004 -384 -EXPANDING IMMOKALEE REDEVELOPMENT AREA BOUNDARY APPENDIX B IMMOKALEE EXISTING CONDITIONS MAP APPENDIX C BAYSHORE/GATEWAY EXISTING CONDITIONS MAPS -2000 APPENDIX D GATEWAY TRIANGLE STORMWATER MASTER PLAN TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM -2000 APPENDIX E BAYS HORE/GATEWAY ESTIMATED FUTURE DEVELOPMENT VALUE -2000 APPENDIX F 2012-2025 FUTURE LAND USE MAP 146 1 Section 1 PLAN OVERVIEW Section 1.1 Intrnriurtinn The Collier County Redevelopment Plan (CRA Plan) is a guide for the physical and economic revitalization and enhancement of the designated redevelopment areas. This plan, with its specific components, has been formulated in close cooperation with the members of each community and is based on the objectives identified by community members in a series of public workshops. The Collier County Community Redevelopment Agency consists of two areas designated by the Collier County Board of County commissioners as redevelopment areas under the authority of Florida Statutes, Chapter 163, Part III, Community Redevelopment Act. The two areas depicted on Figure 1 as amended, were identified by the presence of one or more conditions of blight as defined in the statutes. These findings are contained in Section 1.2 and further specified in the Appendix A and component section for each area. The redevelopment program in Collier County provides the authority granted by the statutes, the means to achieve growth management objectives, by redirecting growth to areas where urban services currently are provided or are needed but currently inadequate, encourages revitalization of once viable neighborhoods and business districts and encourages the provision of affordable, good quality housing within centers of urban concentration. The Collier County Growth Management Plan policies provide the rationale for the establishment of redevelopment areas in the county and recognizes the redevelopment plan adopted for each component area. In addition, each community has formulated their own specific objectives. Each component section describes the history and process of community involvement in each respective community. The Collier County Community Redevelopment Agency approved an expansion to the Immokalee Community Redevelopment Area boundary in 2004 (Resolution 2004-179 and Resolution 2004-384). In 2018, the Collier County Community Redevelopment Agency approved a contract with Tindale Oliver Design to gathered data, perform technological analysis and seek public and agency input in order to draft an amendment to this redevelopment plan that would lay out a framework of goals, objectives, and strategies to continue the redevelopment efforts in the Bayshore Gateway Triangle Community Redevelopment Area. In 1969, the Florida State Legislature established Chapter 163, Part III, enabling local units of government to declare a need for a Community Redevelopment Agency and outlines the powers available to carryout community redevelopment and related activities. The overall goal of the legislature was to encourage local initiative in downtown and neighborhood revitalization. The Florida Legislature has made amendments to the enabling legislation over the years. This Plan recognizes those amendments. Figure 1 — Updated Map 146 1 r W a w z rI w a a V 0 6z HS ✓1i N R 21S T J W 3 � o Oma OlOS3 S Oma oloS30 +' b N Oma S3 J2f3A3 S OA18 530V1083A �J L 3 O Q ca t � d 0�00� a � m ++ o C w oma a3nlos OLU N 0 1a NV Ol O p n m d t- U o .O N Ob ON llfld 1 OdaIV v s co a a LQ) !b m N l 1 IwVIVIUjo mwv Nq v Q GUFF & M�x\Go u❑q aFL E V a<E O WNW 0 a<9LL 2 N 148 1 Section 1.2 Findings and Conditions of Blight In 1969, the Florida State Legislature established Statue 163.00 enabling local units of government to set up Community Redevelopment Agencies (CRA). To assist in redevelopment efforts, these local agencies were mandated to establish Redevelopment Trust Funds, which would serve as the depository for tax increment revenues. The overall goal of the legislature was to encourage local initiative in downtown and neighborhood revitalization. In 1984, the Florida Legislature amended Section 163.335 to include five primary objectives: 1. To address the physical, social, and economic problems associated with slum and blighted areas (F.S. 163.335 (1)); 2. To encourage local units of government to improve the physical environment (i.e. buildings, streets, utilities, parks, etc.) by means of rehabilitation, conservation or clearance /redevelopment (F.S. 163.335(2)); 3. To convey to local community redevelopment agencies the powers of eminent domain, expenditure of public funds, and all other general police powers as a means by which slum and blighted areas can be improved (F.S. 163.335 (3)); 4. To enhance the tax base in the redevelopment area by encouraging private reinvestment in the area and by channeling tax increment revenues into public improvements within the area (F.S. 163.335 (4)); 5. To eliminate substandard housing conditions and to provide adequate amounts of housing in good condition to residents of low or moderate income, particularly to the elderly (F.S. 163.335(5)). To be designated as a redevelopment area, the area must meet the criteria outlined in Chapter 163.340 of the Florida Statute. The area in Collier county were designated as Blighted" which is defined as the following: "Blighted Area" means either: (a) An area in which there a substantial number of slum, deteriorated, or deteriorating structures and conditions which endanger life or property by fire or other causes or one or more of the following factors which substantially impairs or arrests the sound growth of a county or municipality and is a menace to the public health, safety, morals, or welfare in its present condition and use: 1. Predominance of defective or inadequate street layout; 2. Faulty lot layout in relation to size, adequacy, accessibility, or usefulness; 3. Unsanitary or unsafe conditions; 4. Deterioration of site or other improvements 5. Tax or special assessment delinquency exceeding the fair value of the land; and 6. Diversity of ownership or defective or unusual conditions of title which prevent the free alienability of land within the deteriorated or hazardous area; or (b) An area in which there exists faulty or inadequate street layout; inadequate parking facilities; or roadways, bridges, or public transportation facilities incapable of handling the volume of traffic flow into or through the area, either at present or following proposed construction. 14B 1 On March 14, 2000, the Collier County Board of County Commissioners made finding of conditions of blight and adopted Resolution 2000-82 and adopted Resolution 2000-83 establishing the Community Redevelopment Agency. Both of these resolutions are contained in Appendix A. Section 1.3 CONSISTENCY WITH THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN The Collier County Growth Management Plan provides land use designations, which describe the intent and allowable density and intensity of appropriate uses for future development. The Growth Management Plan was adopted by the Board of County Commissioners in 1989 and has been amended several times since the original adoption. This section identifies the goals, objectives and policies that apply to both redevelopment areas. The goals, objectives and policies that apply to each area specifically are included in Section 4 — Immokalee Redevelopment Area Plan and Section 5 — Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Area Plan. This amendment recognizes that the Immokalee Redevelopment Area Plan will be amended following the adoption of the updated Immokalee Area Master Plan currently going through the public hearing process. Both the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Area and the Immokalee Redevelopment Area are located in the Urban Designation as identified on the Collier County Future Land Use Map Appendix F. As stated in the Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan: Urban Designated Areas on the Future Land Use Map include two general portions of Collier County: areas with the greatest residential densities, and areas in close proximity, which have or are projected to receive future urban support facilities and services. It is intended that Urban Designated Areas accommodate the majority of population growth and that new intensive land uses be located within them. Accordingly, the Urban Area will accommodate residential uses and a variety of non- residential uses. The Urban Designated Area, which includes Immokalee, Copeland, Plantation Island, Chokoloskee, Port of the Islands, and Goodland, in addition to the greater Naples area, represents less than 10% of Collier County's land area. The redevelopment plan allows for detailed planning that will encourage the coordination of activities as outlined in Objective 4 of the Growth Management Plan. OBJECTIVE 4: Continually refine the Future Land Use Element through detailed planning in order to improve coordination of land uses with natural and historic resources, public facilities, economic development, housing and urban design. Policy 4.8 recognizes the adoption of the redevelopment plans for each component area: Policy 4.8: The Board of County Commissioners may consider whether to adopt redevelopment plans for existing commercial and residential areas. Such plans may include alternative land uses, modifications to development standards, and incentives that may be necessary to encourage redevelopment. Such redevelopment plans may only be prepared by the County or its agent unless otherwise authorized by the Board of County Commissioners. The Bays hore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Plan was adopted by the Board on June 13, 2000; it encompasses the Bayshore Drive corridor and the triangle area formed by US41 East, Davis Boulevard an Airport -Pulling Road. The Immokalee Redevelopment Plan was adopted 148 1 by the Board on June 13, 2000. Other specific areas that may be considered by the Board of County Commissioners for redevelopment include, but are not necessarily limited to: a. Pine Ridge, between US41 North and Goodlette-Frank Road; b. US 41 North in Naples Park; and c. Bonita Beach Road between Vanderbilt Drive and the west end of Little Hickory Shores #1 Subdivision. The Immokalee Community is governed by the entire Growth Management Plan which includes the Immokalee Area Master Plan (reference FLUE Policy 4.3), a separate element of the Growth Management Plan adopted in 1991 and significantly revised in 1997 and 2007. The Master Plan contains land use designations and policies applicable to the Immokalee area. Significant amendments to the Immokalee Area Master Plan are under review. A review of the land use designation and policies that apply for each area is contained in the individual component section of this document: Section 4 — Immokalee Redevelopment Area Plan and Section 5 — Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Area Plan. Section 1.4 CONFORMANCE WITH STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS Chapter 163, Part III of the Florida Statutes authorizes the creation of Community Redevelopment Agencies and the development of Community Redevelopment Plans. The legislation focuses primarily on the creation of Community Redevelopment Agencies, the powers granted to them and specific criteria of the development of Community Redevelopment Plans. As part of a Community Redevelopment Agency's formation, a Community Redevelopment Plan is created which provides the framework for effective redevelopment of the Community Redevelopment Area. The Community Redevelopment Plan is a comprehensive document that provides the details for redevelopment of the area, including an extensive analysis required by Florida Statutes. In accordance with Florida Statues, the governing body, in this case the Board of County Commissioners, may make subsequent changes, amendments or updates to the Community Redevelopment Plan upon recommendations of the Community Redevelopment Agency. Modifications to the plan require a public hearing process and appropriate public notification. The Community Redevelopment Act requires redevelopment plans to be consistent with the comprehensive growth management plan. This plan is as a whole consistent with the Collier County Growth Management Plan. This plan establishes a vision for the community as a whole, the component areas and its neighborhoods. The CRA's vision will not be achieved overnight or even in the next five years. This plan is intended to provide a framework for policy decisions and public improvements over the next thirty years. For the purposes of this plan, "encourage" means to support, recommend, endorse or seek approval of any project, action, program or activity and can also mean to provide incentives and allocate funds, assets and resources, including participation by staff, employees, contractors, consultants or others if approved by the Collier County Agency (CRA) and allocated through the standard operating and procurement guidelines adopted by the Collier County Board of Commissioners. 14B 1 This plan contains provisions that contemplate actions to be taken by the Board of County Commissioners (BCC), including various agencies, departments or boards of the County. While the BCC has adopted this Plan, any recommendations requiring further BCC action will be taken separately to the BCC to approve and authorize implementation of any such actions. The Private Sector The Redevelopment Plan cannot be implemented without the predominant participation of the private sector. The role of the private sector is to evaluate the effectiveness of an investment risk in the Redevelopment Area and to pursue development opportunity consistent with the Redevelopment Plan. 14B 1 Section 1.5 The Community Redevelopment Agency The management structure established to undertake formal redevelopment activities within the Redevelopment Area is the Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA). Pursuant to the Community Redevelopment Act, the Collier County Board of County Commissioners declared itself the CRA. The CRA is a legal entity, separate and distinct from the Board of County Commissioners. The Community Redevelopment Agency will use any and all methods of implementing the plan as authorized by law. The CRA will exercise the powers conferred by statute to take action within the Redevelopment Area such as will result in economic revitalization consistent with the Plan. The Board of County Commissioners has the following powers: • The power to determine an area to be slum or blighted or a combination thereof; to designate such area as appropriate for a community redevelopment project; and to hold any public hearings required with respect thereto. • The power to grant final approval to Community Redevelopment Plans and modifications thereof. • The power to authorize the issuance of revenue bonds as set forth in Section 163.385, Florida Statutes. • The power to approve the acquisition, demolition, removal or disposal of property and the power to assume the responsibility to bear loss as provided in Section 163.370, Florida Statutes. Community Redevelopment Agency Authority This Plan will be undertaken in accordance with the provisions of the Community Redevelopment Act of 1969. The County and the CRA may use any and all methods of achieving revitalization of the Redevelopment Area as authorized by law. The following sections generally describe the available development actions. Property Acquisition The Act authorizes the County and the Redevelopment Agency to acquire real property in the redevelopment area by purchase, condemnation, gift, exchange or other lawful means in accordance with this Plan. The County and CRA may acquire real property within the redevelopment area as may be necessary for public improvements. These acquisitions will provide sites for public facilities, eliminate unsafe conditions, removing non -conforming uses, or overcome diversity of ownership and faulty lot layout which prevent redevelopment and contribute to the perpetuation of blight in the area. Whenever possible, the designated property will be acquired through negotiation with current owners. The property will be acquired through standard Community Redevelopment Agency procedures. In those instances where negotiation does not result in a mutually satisfactory agreement, the properties may be acquired by eminent domain proceedings and just compensation awarded in accordance with Chapter 170, Florida Statutes. Areas for potential land acquisition and relocation (if necessary) are indicated in the component sections of this plan. When necessary, as plans are further specified in Phase 1 (2001-2005) particular parcels will be identified for acquisition where applicable. Such plans will be subject to approval by the CRA Board. The following provides the policies which would govern acquisition, disposition, or relocation activities. 146 1 Land Acquisition Plan and Program A land acquisition program will be designed to meet the goals and objectives of the redevelopment plan, while minimizing disruption of the neighborhood fabric to be retained and reinforced and minimizing acquisition costs. A land acquisition program could consist of the following components: • Right of Way Acquisition • Commercial Project Acquisitions • Residential Acquisitions for Major Projects • Residential Acquisitions for Infill Demolition Site Preparation and Public Improvement The County and the CRA may each demolish, clear or move buildings, structures and other improvements from real property in the redevelopment area which it has acquired and as may be necessary to carry out the purpose of this plan. In addition, the County and /or the CRA may construct or cause to be constructed streets, sidewalks, curbs, utilities, lighting, open space, plazas, landscaping, water elements, and other amenities deemed necessary to implement this plan. The County and CRA may change portions of the redevelopment area to be devoted to public uses, public improvements, and infrastructure. Disposition Policy The CRA is authorized under the Act to sell, lease, exchange, subdivide, transfer, assign, pledge encumber by mortgage or deed of trust, or otherwise dispose of any interest in real property. To the extent permitted by law, the CRA is authorized to dispose of Real Property by negotiated sale or lease. All real property acquired by the CRA in the redevelopment area shall be sold or leased for development for the fair value to further the purpose of this plan and as determined pursuant to 163.380 (2), Florida Statute ( 2018). The CRA may reserve such powers and controls through disposition and development document with the purchasers or lessees of real property from the CRA as may be necessary to ensure that development begins within a reasonable period of time and that such development is carried out pursuant to the purpose of this plan. Interested developers will submit proposals in accordance with Section 163.380, Florida Statues. Selected developers will be required to execute binding disposition agreements with the CRA which will safeguard that the provisions of this plan be implemented. The property may be transferred for fair value subject to the disposition agreement and other conditions or covenants necessary to ensure that the purpose of redevelopment will be effectuated. The disposition of all publicly owned or assembled land will be subject to objective and clearly defined standards and procedures which will assure timely re -uses and improvements to property in accordance with the plan and its development controls. Guidelines may include but are not limited the following activities: • Site Re -Use Guidelines • Preferred Redeveloper Designation • Competitive Private Developer Selection • Terms of Property Conveyance 146 1 • Development Controls and Design Review • Residential Relocation • Commercial Relocation The CRA's Relocation Procedures are described in Section 6 of this Plan. Section 1.6 Duration, Modification and Severability of the Plan The 2000 plan was approved with a 30 -year time frame. From time to time during the term of this plan, the CRA may amend or modify this Plan. The provisions of this Plan are severable, and it is the intention of the County and the CRA to confer the whole or any part of the powers, goals, objectives and actions herein provided for and if any of the provisions of this Plan or any action implementing any provisions of this Plan shall be held unconstitutional, invalid or void by any court of competent jurisdiction, the decisions of said court shall not affect or impair any of the remaining provisions of this Plan. It is hereby declared to be the intent of the County and the CRA that this Plan would have been adopted and implemented had such unconstitutional, invalid or void provision or action not been included herein. 148 1 Section 2 FINANCIAL PLAN A viable financing program for redevelopment requires a strong commitment from the public and private sector. The key to implementation the public actions called for in this plan is attracting private market investment and the additional ad valorem tax revenue it produces. To carry out redevelopment, the CRA will use all available sources of funding from local, state and federal government and the private sector. It should be noted that the following Financial Plan is intended as a guide for funding redevelopment activities in the Redevelopment Area. Flexibility is essential. The timing, cost and tax revenue impact of private investment is, at best, a projection based upon existing knowledge. Interest rates, construction costs, and national economic conditions will vary and cause revisions in investment decisions. Section 2.1 Funding Sources Tax Increment Financing Redevelopment of the Redevelopment Area will require a substantial financial investment on the part of the Community Redevelopment Agency. As provided for under the Community Redevelopment Act of 1969, the principal source of funding for the Redevelopment Agency will be through the mechanism of Tax Increment Financing. Tax Increment Financing (TIF) realizes the incremental increase in property tax revenues resulting from redevelopment and uses it to pay for public improvements needed to support and encourage new development. TIF is designed to allow local government to finance, over a term of years, front-end costs involved in the redevelopment of blighted areas. By using this tool a local government can develop and adopt a redevelopment plan, repave or reroute streets, provide other public improvements and open space, provide housing, provide redevelopment assistance or incentives and acquire property within the redevelopment area for redevelopment. Eligible activities, under current law, include but are not limited to, the acquisition of land and improvements, relocation of displaced residents, demolition of deteriorated structures, site preparation, infrastructure improvements plus housing and commercial development and other activities implementing this plan. Use of Tax Increment Revenues Under Florida legislation, increment revenues can be used for the following purposes when directly related to redevelopment: $ Administrative and overhead expenses incidental to a redevelopment plan. $ Redevelopment planning and analysis. $ Acquisition of real property in the redevelopment area. $ Clearance and preparation of redevelopment sites, and relocation costs. $ Repayment of indebtedness and payment of expenses incidental to indebtedness. $ Development of affordable housing within the redevelopment area. $ Development of community policing innovations. $ Construction streets, utilities, parks, public areas, parking garages, and other improvements necessary to carrying out the redevelopment plan. Ice 14B 1 The greatest single source of funding for the Community Redevelopment Agency will come from tax increment revenues determined by growth in certain real property tax revenues within the Redevelopment Area. For the purpose of calculating the amount of tax increment revenues the frozen tax base is the final 1999 tax roll. Projected tax increment revenues for each component area is included in the Component sections of this Plan. Section 2.2 Other Funding Sources To make the most effective use of Tax Increment Revenues, the CRA and the County will use other County, State and Federal funding sources as appropriate and available to carry out the provisions of this plan. The Financial Plan assume that funds for the public expenditures identified in the Redevelopment Plan will be obtained from several sources in addition to Tax Increment Financing. Advances and Loans The Community Redevelopment Agency shall have the power to borrow money and accept advances from any source, public or private, including the County for any lawful purpose in connection with the redevelopment program. Tax Increment Revenues or any other funds deposited into the Redevelopment Trust Fund, which are not otherwise obligated shall be available for repayment of such loans or advances. Tax Increment Revenue Bonds When authorized by the Board of County Commissioners, the CRA may issue redevelopment revenue bonds, notes or other obligations to finance the undertaking of any community redevelopment project activity, including the payment of principal and interest upon any loans and retirement of bonds or other obligations previously issued. The security for such bonds may be based upon the anticipated tax increment revenues and such other revenues as may be legally available. Grants The Community Redevelopment Agency may apply for local, state or federal grants that may be applicable to implementation of the redevelopment goals outlined in this Plan. Tax Increment revenues may be used to match grant dollars if necessary. 11 14B i Section 3 NEIGHBORHOOD IMPACT ELEMENT Since the redevelopment area contains low- and moderate -income housing, Section 163.362(3) Florida Statutes requires that the redevelopment plan contain a neighborhood impact element which... describe in detail the impact of the redevelopment upon the residents of the redevelopment area and the surrounding area in terms of relocation, traffic circulation, environmental quality, availability of community facilities and services, effect on school population, and other matters affecting the physical and social quality of the neighborhood. The structure of the Redevelopment Plan was specifically organized to minimize housing and residential neighborhood impacts while emphasizing neighborhood enhancement, particularly in those areas containing affordable housing stock. The intensive redevelopment activities recommended in the plan concentrate on existing commercial and semi -industrial areas. Each component section contains a Neighborhood Impact Element. 12 b S t .j•=f °it1v�Y ,r i f��i367�:,. S ( �f i `� � f � t o Kr ...' �; �! r � t � �# f;S �3i� r_: � � �i �� '. .- ,� .�v ..�" �i7�1_� �,YS is b S t .j•=f °it1v�Y 148 1 Section 4.1 Introduction The Immokalee Redevelopment Area Plan has been formulated in close cooperation with the people of Immokalee.and is based on the objectives identified by community members in a series of public workshops. This area plan is a guide for the physical and economic revitalization and enhancement of the Immokalee Community. This area plan capitalizes on the existing Main Street project, the federal Enterprise Community designation, the Regional Airport Industrial Park and Lake Trafford to create a catalyst for revitalizing the community and improving the housing stock. Figure 2 illustrates the proposed boundaries for the redevelopment area. Immokalee has long been considered isolated from the coastal county both in location and demographics, Immokalee's development is based on its agriculture resources, which resulted in Immokalee becoming the leading producer of winter vegetables in.the United States. However, as the economics.of agriculture changed the social problems associated with low wages, an unskilled labor force, and a transient multi -cultural population grew, One of the results has been a lack of reinvestment into the area. The economy of rural Southwest Florida has been and continues to be based primarily on agriculture, which has not kept pace with job growth throughout the stake of Florida. Rural Florida continues to have lower earned income, higher unemployment, lower property values and fewer opportunities for employment. Regionally, the major economic contributors are retirement, tourism, construction, agriculture and the environment. Although tourism has a major impact on the regional urban economy, the Immokalee Community has yet to reap the benefits. The Immokalee Community was designated as a Federal Champion Community in 1994, a Florida Main Street area in 1996, and a Federal Enterprise Community in 1999. During the application process for the Empowerment Zone/Enterprise Community grant a series of community meetings were held with several hundred community residents attending. Based on the community input and the consensus reached at these meetings a Strategic Plan was written. The Plan identifies four areas of concern; 1. Accessibility and Appropriateness of Education and Training 2. Diversification of the economic base and availability of higher wage jobs 3, The availability of decent and affordable housing 4. Community Image and pride The Immokalee Redevelopment Area Plan incorporates the goals and strategies identified in the Enterprise Strategic Plan as the basis for the redevelopment pian. 13 148 1 14 14B 1 Section 4.2 FINDINGS. AND CONDITIONS OF BLIGHT Blighted Area [as defined in Section 163 340 (8) Florida Statutes means either: (a) An area in which there are a substantial number of slum, deteriorated or deteriorating structures and conditions which endanger life or property by fire or other causes or one or more of the following factors which substantially impairs or arrests the sound growth of a county or municipality and is a menace to the public health, safety, morals, or welfare in its present condition and use: 1. Predominance of defective or inadequate street layout; The Immokalee Redevelopment Area is characterized by a defective or inadequate street layout, Most Immokalee residents walk or bicycle to work, school and shopping. Few adequate bicycle and pedestrian facilities are available throughout the Immpkalee study area. Problems include: inadequate street layout and design Lack of shoulders and guardrails along streets adjacent to deep and wide drainage swales Poor access to Comrr ercial and Industrial parking and access problems Few sidewalks available for a predominately pedestrian population A general lack of neighborhood connections to each other -- The major arterial roadways are State Road 29, Immokalee Road and New Market Road (SR 29A). State Road 29 is a two-lane facility that widens to four lanes through the small downtown area. The four -lane segment is called Main Street and is the focus of redevelopment and economic revitalization. It is the only segment with on -street parking and sidewalks on both sides. The two _lane segments of State Road 29 north and east of Main Street are two lanes with no sidewalks. New Market Road is a two-lane facility with 100 feet of right-of-way and no sidewalks, paved shoulders, or turn lanes. -The remaining right-of-way and truck parking is limestone. Vegetable and fruit packing houses and the State Farmers Market are located along this street. Trucks are encouraged to use this street as a bypass road to avoid the. downtown area and to pick up goods for transport. The roadway is in poor condition and maintenance costs are high due to damage by trucks dragging limestone on roadway. Although many people walk or bicycle to work in this area, pathway facilities are unavailable. Immokalee Road intersects with SR 29 at the beginning of Main .Street. North of Main Street it narrows to two lanes and has a sidewalk on the west side only. - Major problems exist along many of the local roads. There are few sidewalks. Typical local street widths are less than twenty feet required in the Collier County Land Development Code and open stormwater systems are adjacent to roadways without paved shoulders or guardrails. For example, south of State Road 29, along 91h Street, there are deep, wide drainage ditches on both sides of the roadway, There are no sidewalks and no guardrails to safeguard pedestrians and motorists. The roadway width is eighteen feet and there are not enough rights of way to construct pathway facilities without converting the open swales to a covered stormwater system. .... 15 146 1 In addition, many residential neighborhoods are not linked to one another and most of the commercial areas are not linked to one another. The Immokalee Regional Airport and Industrial Park lack adequate water and sewer service and stormwater management facilities to sufficiently handle the projected future development. County Road 846 that leads to Airpark Blvd. is a two-lane facility with narrow lanes and no paved shoulders. This facility does not adequately address the projected increase in truck traffic due to the future development of the airport and industrial park. 2', Faulty lot layout in relation to size, adequacy, accessibility, or usefulness: The majority of commercial lots are zoned General Commercial District (C-4) or Heavy Commercial District (C-5). In the C-4 and C-5 zoning district a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet, with a width of 100 feet for commercial development is required. Many of the commercial lots in these zoning districts do not meet the minimum width required for commercial development. Some do not meet either of the lot width or lot square footage requirements.. Existing buildings are frequently non- conforming with regards to required minimum lot width, size, setbacks, and buffers. The RMF6 zoning district has a minimum requirement of 6500 square feet with a width of 60 feet for a single family development; 12,000 square feet with a width of 80 feet for a two-family development; and 5,500 square feet per unit with a width of 100 feet for a three or more family residential development. The majerity of lots are non -conforming and rebuilding on these lots may require the owner to seek a variance from the development standards. In the South Immokalee area over 50% of the platted lots are non -conforming. The majority of these lots are zoned C-4 or RMF -6, A majority of the mobile home parks in the Immokalee community were developed in the 1970's and do not meet the minimum standards and permitted densities. The Collier County Land Development Code requires a minimum lot size of 6,000 square feet with a width of 60 feet for residential -development in the VR and MH zoning districts. It is common in the Immokalee Community to have intensive commercial uses located adjacent to residential uses without adequate buffering between the uses. 3. Unsanitary or unsafe conditions: According to 1990 Census Data, 1.2 percent of Immokalee' area households lack complete plumbing for exclusive use. In the entire county, this figure is 0.2 percent. In occupied housing units in Immokalee according to the 1990 U.S. Census, 6.8 percent of the owner occupied units and 16 percent of the renter occupied units had more than 1.51 or more persons per room. This figure is .03 for the entire County reflecting a greater degree of overcrowding in the Immokalee area. Based on the 1994 Immokalee Housing Study, there were a total of 4,957 housing units of those 1,282 or 26% are in need"of rehabilitation. In the Immokalee study area, 19 unsafe buildings and 4 non -secure structures were identified from January 1998 to February 2000. Sidewalks are almost entirely absent from the redevelopment area, 16 146 1 There is a lack of street lighting in the most of the residential neighborhoods. Wide and deep open swales are present in the South Immokalee neighborhoods, They accumulate stagnate water and trash. The disposal of garbage in the Immokalee area is a problem. Lack of adequate dumpsters for the mobile home parks and commercial establishment's results in a serious litter problem. The Immokalee Water and Sewer District covers approximately 27 square miles and most of the Urban area of Immokalee. However, the geographic area served by the district is considerably smaller. Additional treatment plants and distribution lines will be needed to serve the entire community. The Immokalee Water and Sewer District is under a consent order from the Department of Environmental Protection due to insufficient handling of their effluent. The spray fields are inadequate. No new sewer hook-ups can be permitted unless the District can show.a reduction of flow to the system. There are a few separate collection systems that were permitted prior to the creation of the district. Those systems need to be upgraded and included within the district's authority. An example is the Baker Street area, which is on a separate collection system. There have been three reported failures since 1997 where raw sewage was deposited on the ground. 4. Deterioration of site or other improvements: Surface water management problems are present within the entire Immokalee study area. These problems include localized .flooding in neighborhoods in the northeast section of the study area. - Many local roads within the study area are poorly drained and experience flooding, as well. Some of the roads are unpaved and poorly drained. In South Immokalee where a high concentration of rental units and pedestrian traffic occurs the typical open drainage ditch is 4 feet deep and 15 feet wide. 5. Tax or special assessment delinquency exceeding the fair value of the land: For purposes of this study, data is unavailable for this topic. S. Diversity of ownership or defective or unusual conditions of title which prevent the free alienability of land within the deteriorated or hazardous area. For purposes of this study, data is unavailable for this topic, (b) An area in which there exists faulty or inadequate street layout; inadequate parking facilities or roadways, bridges or public transportation facilities incapable of handling the volume of traffic flow into or through the area, either at present or following proposed construction. The residential neighborhoods lack connection to one another. In a primarily pedestrian community, there is a lack of an integrated sidewalk system connecting residential areas with commercial establishments. There is no public transportation system. The commercial lots along Main Street and First Street. lack adequate parking facilities. +ul 17 146 1 New Market Road does not adequately address the needs of the semi -trucks and trailers that transport the farm products out of the area. Heavy truck traffic on local streets intrudes residential neighborhoods and has had a negative impact on commercial redevelopment activities, SR 29 does not provide the number of lanes needed to adequately serve the Immokalee Regional Airport and Industrial Park. Housing Affordability las defined in Section 163.355 (8) F.S.I means: An area in which there is a shortage of housing affordable to residents of low or moderate income, including the elderly. A housing unit is considered affordable if the monthly payments do not exceed 35 percent of the monthly income for principal, interests, taxes, and insurance. According to the 1994 Immokalee Housing Study 36 percent of the households with a mortgage and 40 percent of renter occupied households pay more than 35 percent of their income for housing. According to the study of those persons making less than $10,000, 72 percent pay more than 35 percent of their income to rent. The median household income in 1990 according to the US. Census Bureau was $15,170. Forty-five percent of the population in Immokalee is below the poverty level. The population growth, as well as high seasonal farm labor population, has produced a critical demand for housing according to the 1999 Empowerment Alliance of Southwest Florida Strategic Plan. There is a shortage of low and moderate income housing in the Immokalee Community CONCLUSION OF FINDINGS OF BLIGHT It is the conclusion of this study that the Immokalee study area clearly has a predominance of defective or inadequate street layout, faulty lot layout, unsafe or unsanitary conditions, and deterioration of a site or other improvements as set forth in Chapter 163 for designation as a blighted area and that rehabllitation, conservation, or redevelopment, or a combination thereof, of the Immokalee study area is necessary and advisable in the furtherance of the public interest of residents of Collier County. 18 14B 1 Section 4.3 CONSISTENCY WITH THE COLLER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN Policy 4.2'of the Collier County Growth Management Plan supports redevelopment efforts in Immokalee as stated below: Policy 4.2 A detailed Master Plan for the Immokalee has been developed and was incorporated into this Growth Management Plan in February, 1991. The Master Plan addresses Natural Resources, Future Land Use, Public Facilities, Housing , Urban Design, Land Development Regulations and other considerations. Major purposes of the Master Plan shall be coordination of land use and transportation planning, redevelopment or renewal of blighted areas and elimination of land uses inconsistent with the community's character. The Immokalee Redevelopment Area mirrors the area included in the Immokalee area Master Plan. The Immokalee Area Master Plan (cAMP) was adopted by the Board of County in 1991 as a separate element of the Growth Management Plan due to the unique character of Immokalee. A separate Future Land Use Map was also adopted for Immokalee and is presented'in Figure 3 , The land uses available in the Immokalee area listed below. Some inconsistencies with allowable residential density and land use exist where areas where platted years ago or mobile home parks were allowed to accommodate the large migrant population. There are several situations where residential is interspersed among commercial and industrial uses. The Planning -Services Department is currently conducting an analysis of the mobile home parks and will be recommending amendments to the IMAP to accommodate existing mobile home parks that are not consistent with the IMAP. The following section describes land use designations, shown on the Immokalee Master Plan Future Land Use Map. These designations generally indicate the types of land uses for which zoning may be requested. However, these land use designations do not guarantee that a zoning request will be approved. Residential Designation This designation is intended to accommodate a variety of residential land uses including single-family, duplexes, multi -family, and mobile homes, which does not preclude seasonal, temporary and migrant farm worker housing. 1. Low Residential District The.purpose of this designation is to provide for a low-density residential district. Residential dwellings shall be limited to single-family structures and duplexes. Multi -family dwellings shall be permitted provided they are within a Planned Unit Development. Mobile home development shall be permitted in the form of mobile home sub -divisions or parks and as a mobile home overlay as defined by the Land Development Code. A density less than or equal to four (4) dwelling units per gross acre is permitted. 2. Mixed Residential District The purpose of this designation is to provide for a mixture of housing types within medium density residential areas. Residential dwellings shall include single-family structure, multi -family dwellings, individual mobile homes, and duplexes on a lot by lot basis. A density less than or equal to six (6) dwellings units per gross acre is permitted. 14B 1 3 High Residential District The purpose of this designation is to provide for a district of high-density residential development, Residential dwellings shall be limited to multi -family structures and less intensive units such as single family and duplexes provided they are compatible with the district. Mobile home developments shall be permitted only in the form of mobile home subdivisions or parks as defined in the Land Development Code, A density less than or equal to eight (8) dwelling units per gross acre is permitted. 4. Nonresidential Uses Non --residential uses permitted within the residential designation are limited to those uses that are compatible and/or support the residential character of the area. The allowed uses include: parks, open space and recreational uses, churches, libraries, cemeteries, public and private schools, day-care centers and essential services as defined in the Land Development Code, Commercial Designation ' The designation is'intended to accommodate a variety of commercial land uses including neighborhood oriented commercial uses, commerce center uses, general highway commercial and commercial development within Planned Unit Developments. Migrant Labor Camps are also permitted within the Commercial designations. 1, Commercial District The purpose of this designation is to provide for retail, office, transient lodging facilities and highway commercial that serve the needs of the traveling public generally C-1 through C-4 Commercial Zoning Districts as identified in the Land Development Code. These commercial uses must be located on a - major arterial or collector roadway. 2. Neigh4orhood Center District The purpose of this land use classification is to provide for centers of activity that serves the needs of the surrounding neighborhoods. The centers should contain a mix of neighborhood -oriented uses such as day care center, parks, schools, and governmental activities. Other development criteria that shall apply to all neighborhood centers includes the following: a. To achieve a neighborhood character, these centers are encouraged to be anchored by elementary schools, neighborhood scale parks, and/or churches. b. A center should be limited to 80-120 acres in size, and will serve a population ranging between 5,000 to 7,500 people, or accommodate a service area of one (1) mile radius. C. The Neighborhood Centers should be no closer than one (1) mile. d. Non-residential uses shall be at least 20% of the size of the Neighborhood Center. e. Residential development within the designated Neighborhoods Centers shall permit a maximum density of twelve (12) units per gross acre. Residential dwelling units shall be limited to multi -family structures and less intensive units such as single-family and duplexes provided they are compatible with the district. Mobile home developments shall be permitted only in the form of mobile home subdivisions or parks as defined in the Land Development Code. .. 20 14B 1 f. Commercial development shall be permitted within a Neighborhood Center provided all of the following criteria are met; �. Commercial uses shall be limited to barber and beauty shops; drug stores; deli; meat market; bicycle services; restaurant; dry cleaning; veterinary clinics; medical offices; laundry facilities; any other convenience commercial uses which is compatible in nature with the. foregoing uses. The Collier County School Board will be notified of any proposed use to avoid conflict with the nearby schools; and 2. No commercial use shall be permitted within a'/ mile of an existing school property line within a Neighborhood Center; and 3. Access to the commercial development must in no way conflict with the school traffic in the area; and 4. The design of any proposed commercial development must take into consideration the safety of the school children; and 5. The projects within the Neighborhood Centers shall encourage provisions for shared parking arrangements with adjoining developments; and Driveways and curb cuts shall be consolidated with adjoining developments; and 7. Projects directly abutting residentially zoned property shall provide, at a minimum, a 50 foot setback and landscape buffer; and 8. Projects shall provide a 10 foot wide landscaped strip between the abutting right-of-way and the off-street parking area. From time to time new Neighborhood Centers may be proposed. No two centers may be closer than one mile from each other. New Neighborhood Centers would require market justification and must meet size, spacing and use criteria expressed earlier. 3. Commerce Center - Mixed Use District The purpose of this designation is to create. a major activity center that services the entire Immokalee Urban Designated Area and surrounding agricultural area, The Mixed -Use District shall function as an employment center and shall encourage commercial and institutional uses. Uses permitted within this Sub -district shall include shopping center, governmental institutions, middle or high school, Community Park and other employment generating uses. Other permitted commercial uses shall include transient lodging facilities at 26 dwelling units per acre. The appropriate zoning districts include C-1 through C-4 as identified in the Land Development Code, In considering new commercial zoning, priority shall be given to protecting existing residential uses. Residential development is permitted within the mixed-use Sub -district at a.maximum density of twelve (12) units per gross acre. Residential dwellings shall be limited to multi -family structures and less intensive units such as single-family' and duplexes provided they are compatible with the district. Mobile home developments shall be permitted only in the form of mobile home subdivisions or parks as defined in the Land Development Code. _- 21 1. 14B 1 The mixed-use district will be controlled via a series of performance standards that address issues of buffering, noise, signage, and lighting, architectural compatibility, and lot size, parking and landscaping. 4. Planned Unit Development Commercial District Commercial development shall be permitted within a Planned Unit Development provided the following size and development criteria are met. There are three (3) categories for PUD Commercial. The commercial component within a PUD will be allowed to develop up to the maximum acreage specified in the table below: In.addition to the above criteria, the following standards must also be met; a. Commercial zoning shall be no closer than one (1) mile to the nearest commerce center and no closer than one mile from the nearest PUD commercial zoning of ten acres or greater in size; b. The configuration of the commercial parcel shall be no more frontage than depth unless otherwise authorized by the Board of County Commissioners; C. Commercial zoning or development shall be no closer than a % mile from the nearest existing elementary school boundary; and d. No construction in the commercial designated area shall be allowed until 30% of the project has commenced construction unless otherwise authorized by the Board of County Commissioners. Non-commercial Uses In addition to those mixed -uses permitted within the Commercial Designations, uses such as parks, open space and recreational uses, churches, libraries, cemeteries, public and private schools, day-care centers and those essential services as defined in the Land Development Code are permitted. 5. Residential/Tourist District The purpose of this District is to provide centers for recreational and tourism activity that utilizes the natural environment, as the main attraction. The centers should contain low intensity uses that attract tourists and residents while preserving the environmental features of the area. Uses permitted in this district include, passive parks, nature preserves; wildlife sanctuaries; open space; museums; cultural facilities; marinas; transient lodging facilities including: hotel(motel, rental cabins, bed & breakfast establishments, campsites, restaurants; recreational vehicles; sporting and recreational camps; low- intensity retail; single family homes; agriculture; and those essential services as defined in the Land Development Code. Residential development is permitted at a density of less than or equal to four (4) dwelling units per gross acre, Transient lodging is permitted at a maximum density of eight (8) units per acre. Rezones are 22 GATEGORY i, CATEGORY 11 CATEGORY III PUD Acres 80+ 160- 10 acres 300+ 20 acres Maximum Commercial Acres 5 acres C-3 C-2, C-3 & C-4 Permitted Zoning C-2 In.addition to the above criteria, the following standards must also be met; a. Commercial zoning shall be no closer than one (1) mile to the nearest commerce center and no closer than one mile from the nearest PUD commercial zoning of ten acres or greater in size; b. The configuration of the commercial parcel shall be no more frontage than depth unless otherwise authorized by the Board of County Commissioners; C. Commercial zoning or development shall be no closer than a % mile from the nearest existing elementary school boundary; and d. No construction in the commercial designated area shall be allowed until 30% of the project has commenced construction unless otherwise authorized by the Board of County Commissioners. Non-commercial Uses In addition to those mixed -uses permitted within the Commercial Designations, uses such as parks, open space and recreational uses, churches, libraries, cemeteries, public and private schools, day-care centers and those essential services as defined in the Land Development Code are permitted. 5. Residential/Tourist District The purpose of this District is to provide centers for recreational and tourism activity that utilizes the natural environment, as the main attraction. The centers should contain low intensity uses that attract tourists and residents while preserving the environmental features of the area. Uses permitted in this district include, passive parks, nature preserves; wildlife sanctuaries; open space; museums; cultural facilities; marinas; transient lodging facilities including: hotel(motel, rental cabins, bed & breakfast establishments, campsites, restaurants; recreational vehicles; sporting and recreational camps; low- intensity retail; single family homes; agriculture; and those essential services as defined in the Land Development Code. Residential development is permitted at a density of less than or equal to four (4) dwelling units per gross acre, Transient lodging is permitted at a maximum density of eight (8) units per acre. Rezones are 22 148 1 encouraged to be in the form of a Planned Unit Development (PUD). The minimum acreage requirement ` for a PUD shall be two (2) contiguous acres. Industria[ Designation This designation is intended to accommodate a variety of industrial land uses such as Industrial, Commerce Center- Industrial, and Business Parks. 1. Industrial District The purpose of this designation is to provide industrial type uses including those uses related to light manufacturing, processing, storage and warehousing, wholesaling, distribution, packing houses, recycling, high technology, laboratories, assembly, storage, computer and data processing, business services, limit commercial such as child care centers, and restaurants and other basic industrial uses but not including retail, as described in the Land Development Code for the industrial and Business Park Zoning Districts. Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the uses permitted in this district, including offices, retail sales, and structures which are customarily accessory and clearly incidental and subordinate to permitted principal uses and structures are also permitted 2. Commerce Center - industrial District The purpose of this designation is to create a major Activity Center that serves the entire Immokalee Urban Designated Area and surrounding agricultural area. The Industrial District shall function as an employment center and shall encourage industrial and commercial uses as described in the Land Development Code for the Commercial (C-1 through C-5), industrial and Business Park Zoning Districts. Higher intensity commercial uses including packing houses, industrial fabricatioh operation and warehouses shall be permitted within this District. Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the uses permitted in this district, including offices, retail sales, and structures which are customarily accessory and clearly incidental and subordinate to permitted principal uses and structures are also permitted. 3. Business Park District Business Parks are intended to include a mix of industrial uses and offices designed in an attractive park -like environment with low structural density where building coverage ranges between 25% to 45% and where large landscaped areas provide for buffering and enjoyment by the employees and patrons of the Park. Business Parks shall comply with the following: a. Business Parks shall be permitted to develop with a maximum of 40% commercial uses, of the type identified in "c" below, to reserve land within the industrially designated areas for the intended industrial uses and to ensure compatibility. b.' Access to arterial road systems shall be in accordance with the Collier County Access Management Policy and consistent with Objective 7 and Policy 7.1 of the Traffic Circulation Element. c. Commercial uses shall include, and shall be limited to, uses such as offices, financial institutions, cultural facilities, and fitness centers/facilities, and shall only be permitted within those areas zoned Business Park or Planned Unit Development within the Industrial Designation. . d. Business Parks must be a minimum of 35 acres in size. The Planned Unit Development and/or rezoning ordinance document for Business Park projects shall contain specific language regarding the permitted non -industrial, uses and development characteristic guidelines consistent with those stated above. Non -industrial Uses In addition to those industrial uses permitted within the Industrial Designation, uses such as those essential services as defined in the Land Development Code are permitted. �._ 23 cy") W w G LL 14B. 1 The TAMP, in addition to the general intent of the land use categories, the LAMP specifies a number of developments and redevelopment'oriented goals, objectives, and policies, which directly or indirectly. relate to the redevelopment of the area. The objectives that are applicable are listed below: Objective 11.2: 13y2005, improve the physical appearance of the commercial building stock by 10% in the Main Street Program area, The CRA Plan is specifically designed to achieve the intent this objective in TAMP. Designation as Florida Main Street laid the foundation for a Community Redevelopment program in this community. The Main Street Program area is targeted for Phase i improvements. OBJECTIVE Il.3: ' Encourage innovative approaches in urban and project design, which enhance both the environment and the visual appeal of Immokalee, OBJECTIVE 11.4: Provide land use designations, criteria and zoning that recognize the needs of that significant portion of Immokalee`s population, which is primarily pedestrian in nature. The Immokalee Overlay District has been adopted in the Collier County land Development Code. The overlay is currently divided into six sub -districts, The purpose of this overlay district is to establish criteria suitable for the unique land use needs of the Immokalee Community. This plan supports the continued development of criteria in each sub -district to encourage redevelopment in the areas identified. The plan -- further acknowledges the need to provide design and flexible development standards in Immokalee OBJECTIVE 111, 1: Collier County shall promote the conservation and rehabilitation of housing in Immokalee neighborhoods. OBJECTIVE 111,2: Collier County will respond to the housing needs identified in the housing study of Immokalee by county initiatives, which will reduce the cost of housing development for low and very low-income households. OBJECTIVE: 111.3 By January 1998 the County will have in place a pilot plan of innovative programs and regulatory reforms to reduce the costs of development and maintenance of safe, healthful; and affordable housing for low and very low income households in Immokalee. The Immokalee Redevelopment area plan proposes a comprehensive approach to encouraging the replacement of Mobile homes; revitalization of existing housing stock; the provision of home ownership. opportunities; and encouraging infill development to strengthen viability of existing neighborhoods. Goal VI and its related objectives and policies provide the framework for the connection of transportation issues and commercial revitalization. The interconnection of bike paths and sidewalks is included in the redevelopment plan for Phase I funding. The development of a loop road is identified in" Phase 11 funding as well. This loop will have a positive impact on improving the Main Street area as well as improving truck movements through the town. 25 14B 1 GOAL VI: The Future land use pattern shall be supported by a network of roads, pedestrian.ways,'and bikeways that maintains Immokalee's small- town character, yet achieves efficient and safe traffic movement. Objective VIA: The County shall provide for the safe and convenient movement of pedestrians, motorized and non - motorized vehicles. Goal Vlll and related policies addresses one of the main objectives of the redevelopment area pian to improve the economic conditions of the area be encouraging new development and redevelopment. The redevelopment area plan specifically addresses the development of the Immokalee Regional Airport and the industrial park. The recruitment of new industrial and warehousing uses to the Industrial Park are strongly encouraged. The plan proposes to provide assistance�to recruit new businesses to the Airport through assistance in the permitting process, and economic assistance. In addition, the plan recognizes the need to increase code enforcement and sheriff patrols in the area. Goal VIH: Enhance and diversify the local economy of the Immokalee Community Policy VI11.1.2: The Community Development and Environmental Services Division and the Airport Authority shall promote the development of the Immokalee Airport and surrounding commercial and industrial areas as set forth in the Immokalee Airport Master Plan. Policy VI11.1.3: Develop and initiate a program in 1997 to promote the incentives of'Enterprise Zone designation. Policy VIII.1.4: The Community Development and Environmental Services Division will coordinate with the Collier County Sheriff's Department on investigating and pursuing any funding opportunities available under the Safe Neighborhood Act to assist with enhancing the Immokalee community. Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) principles shall be encouraged in all development standards. Section 4.4 COMMUNITY OBJECTIVES The Immokalee Community has a long history of community pride and activity. The first permanent settlers in Immokalee were recorded in 1672. The community received its current name "Immokalee" meaning "my home (in Seminole) in 1897 with the naming of the first post office. Lacking sufficient transportation to other commerce centers Immokalee remained isolated from the coastal towns and developed as an agricultural hub. Immokalee became the leading produce of winter vegetables in the United States. Due to the agricultural employment opportunities, the area has become ethnically mixed, as farm workers from Haiti, Guatemala, and Mexico have made this area their home, Its ethnic, cultural, and linguistic diversity pose significant challenges since different groups often have different values, priorities, and even aesthetics. The cynical nature of agriculture creates major challenges in many aspects of the community including housing, workforce skills, economic pressures from increased global competition and weather conditions. Nevertheless, the residents of this rural community have worked together to meet their challenges. In 1994, the community came together to prepare a grant application for the first round of the Federal Empowerment Zone/Enterprise Community Initiative. A strategic Plan was written based on community �i 26 14-8 1 input. Unfortunately, the community did not'get selected as an Empowerment Zone or Enterprise Community. However, the work that went into the planning process was not forgotten. In 1996, the community applied for, and received, designation as a Florida Main Street area. This program was very successful in bringing technical resources to the community and provided direction on how to move forward on a long awaited goal to improve the physical condition of the downtown area. This group was instrumental in preparing for the second round of Empowerment Zorie/Enterprise Community grants that were announcedby the Federal government in 1998. Five community meetings were held, each with over 100 participants: The Strategic Plan that was developed through this community process is the basis of the Immokalee Redevelopment Area Plan. An Immokalee Community Redevelopment Advisory Committee will be appointed following plan adoptioh to monitor the implementation of the redevelopment area plan... There are four main areas of concern identified by the community. The goals and objectives are listed below: Economic Development Goal Diversify the economic base of the community by focusing on agricultural production, processing and research;.industriaf development including manufacturing, distribution and aviation services; and nature tourism. Objective: Increase Small Business Start -Ups And Expansions Objective: Develop Nature Tourism Objective: Recruit New Businesses To Immokalee And Airport Objective: Nurture Entrepreneurial Business Development and Retention Objective: Expand Research Opportunities in the Health Care industry Objective: Encourage renovation of structures and infill development in the Main Street Program Area. Objective: Increase public transportation opportunities through the community and to outlining areas. Objective: Develop a loop road to serve the truck traffic Housing Goal To Provide Safe, Affordable Housing To All Zone Residents Objective: 'Ensure That Land Is Available At Or Below Market Rate To Build Affordable Housing. Objective: Develop a Public/Private Housing initiative For New Construction For Both Ownership And Rental For Low, Very Low And Moderate Priced Housing, Objective: Improve the Condition of Owner -Occupied Homes through Rehabilitation and Eliminate Substandard dousing Through Code Enforcement Activities. Objective: Improve the condition _of Rental -occupied housing through rehabilitation and code enforcement activities. Objective: Create incentives to replace existing mobile homes with upgraded mobile or manufactured homes, Community image Goaf To Enhance The image And The Perception Of The Community As A Safe, Friendly, Family Oriented Small Town. Objective: Maximize Current Recreational Activities. Objective: Create Recreation/Cultural Opportunities In Cooperation With Business, Existing Youth Development Programs, And Schools. Objective: Develop Cadre Of Volunteers To Serve the community Objective: Create Community Based And Neighborhood Based Beautification Projects. 27 i46 Objective: Increase The Number Of Cultural Activities To Celebrate Community Spirit, Objective: Create an incentive program for litter Control And Neighborhood Cleanups. Objective: Create a Code Enforcement Program that is not complaint driven. Objective: Increase Community Policing activities in the community. Objective: Provide safe and convenient movement of pedestrians throughout the community Objective: Develop a program to improve dirt lots in the Main Street area that will eliminate the dust and dirt that accumulates in the downtown area. Section 4.5 REDEVELOPMENT AREA CHARACTERISTICS AND ANAYSIS The following provides an analysis of the existing conditions of the Immokalee Redevelopment area. Figure _ provides a map of the proposed redevelopment area boundaries. A diagram of the existing conditions is provided in the form of a large fold -out map contained in the Appendix B of this document. The map indicates current`zon'rng, parcel lines, parks, schools, public facilities, and streets. No change is proposed to existing public open space in the Immokalee Community. Redevelopment Area Characteristics Located in northeastern Collier County, the Immokalee Community is located approximately 45 miles from the County seat of Naples. This rural un-incorported area is primarily agricultural. There is one major roadway - Immokalee Road or CR 846- into the community from Naples. State Road 29 provides access Into the Community from the northern counties of Lee and Hendry. Although there are approximately 16,764 acres of land within the redevelopment area, 60% is currently in agricultural use. The remaining land is a mixture of residential, commercial and industrial uses, The estimated 1998 permanent population of Immokalee is 17,806. However,. the populationnearly doubles during the winter months due to the agricultural industry. This increase occurs when the harvest season for vegetables and citrus is at its peak. The 1998 projected peak season population for Immokalee is 32,929. The Immokalee population is considerably different from Collier County as a whole. The 1990 median age in Immokalee is estimated at 21 while the Collier County median age is estimated at 41. In 1990, 65% of Immokalee's population was of Hispanic Origin, which may be of any race, in comparison to 8% of the remainder of -Collier County's population being of Hispanic Origin. The 1990 Household Median Income in Immokalee.was $15,170 in comparison to Collier County's median household income of $34,001. According to the 1990 U.S. Census 45% of the population was below poverty level. Housing Stock There were 5,166 units reported by the Bureau of the U.S. Census in 1990, only 18% were vacant. Within the total number of units occupied in Immokalee.the average person per household rate for owner occupied units is 3.86 and the rate for renter occupied units is 3.57. The number of mobile homes/trailers reported by the 1990 Census is 1805. According to the Census the bulk of housing was constructed between 1970 to 1988. Seven percent of the existing housing stock was built prior to 1960. The 1994.1mmokalee Housing Study reporter! 1,282 housing units in need of rehabilitation or demolition. Sixty percent of the units in need of rehabilitation were mobile homes. A large portion of the housing stock is used to house the migrant farm population. Overcrowding and deteriorated structures have been sited by the. Florida Health Department that monitors migrant camps. 28 i 4 B The dwelling units are primarily, cinder block homes with some wood framed houses built by Habitat for Humanity. There are several multi -family apartment complexes. Commercial Stock South Immokalee consists of older small commercial buildings, The Main Street Corridor has a few vacant structures, some of which are in need of rehabilitation or demolition. Newer commercial development has occurred along SR29. This new development is primarily strip highway commercial. The Plan identifies developing specific standards for this corridor as part of the Immokalee Overlay District. New Market Road is a mixture of -industrial packinghouse facilities and small older commercial building.'This area is also scheduled to have an Overlay developed to meet the specific needs of this commerce center. Employment Opportunities Most of the County's agricultural production occurs in and around Immokalee. The largest employment sector is in agricultural. Individuals working on farms are substantially below those working in other jobs. In 1986, the average weekly wage of a person working in agriculture was, $102 as compared -to those in the retail trade sector that earned an average of weekly wage of $209, A large number of the residents of Immokalee travel to Naples to work in the service, construction or landscape industry. The majority of professional people who are employed in Immokalee live outside of the area. In 1996, the five largest employers in Immokalee are: Collier County Schools(1,089); Six -L's Packing (600); Seminole Indian Casino (306); Marion E. Fether Medical Clinic (170) and N.T. Gargiulo (98) , There are a large number of small retail establishments scattered throughout the community to serve the migrant population who are primarily pedestrians. Land Use Characteristics -:-.General Existing South Immokaee The South Immokalee area is approximately 300 acres with 77% of it developed. It is a primarily a mixture of residential land uses containing 81% of the land area; There is a concentration of mobile homes located west of South V5 Street and East of South 9in Street. The remaining area is commercial with 17% and industrial with one percent. The residential uses located west of South 1St street are, considered non -conforming uses. There is a small percentage of commercial development in the residentially zoned area. These uses are also considered non -conforming. The majority of lots within this area are non -conforming as well. Rebuilding on these properties may require the property owner to seek a variance from the development standards of the zoning district or to aggregate property to meet the regulations. The majority of buildings in this area where in built in the 1970's. The highest concentration of criminal activity in the community takes place in this area, There are few streetlights and few internal sidewalks. Large open swales exist along the neighborhood streets. The Neighborhood Park located in this area provides minimal recreational opportunities. Main Street: Program Area The Main Street area is anchored by the Seminole Indian Casino at the,South end of town and the historic Roberts Ranch site on the west end of Main Street. The Main Street Boundaries include the land adjacent to CR846 (First Street) and SR29 (Main Street) . it is primarily commercial property that has been under utilized. The main intersection (First and MainStreet) has two prime commercial corners vacant. Older residential and mobile homes are found abutting commercial development with little or no buffering. Commercial zoning along with a mixture of mobile home, older single family and multi -family 29 14B 1 l units. The housing in this area is in serious need of rehabilitation. There are no sidewalks on the local streets north or south of Main Street and open drainage ditches are present. The Immokalee Beautification Committee has recently completed the streetscape along this corridor, which includes street lighting and street furniture. The Main Street program has been offering a Facade Grant program as an incentive for renovations to take place. To date five businesses have participated. Many of the buildings need more'that just a fapade improvement. There are several parking lots that are not up to code and result in creating dust and dirt along the corridor, which makes it more difficult to maintain the landscaping. Several buildings are vacant. New Market Road New Market Road is the east -west connector in the community. It serves as the main corridor for truck traffic coming to and from the agricultural packinghouses. Much of the existing right of way is used for truck parking and outdoor sells of vegetables during the harvest season. During the winter months this is a hub of activity. The area is zoned commercial from Glades to Charlotte Street and the residential from Glades to SR29. The residential units along new market road are newer and built on larger lots than those in South Immokalee. Truck Traffic through the residential area has a negative impact on maintaining the value of the area. There are few streetlights and sidewalks in the residential sections of the area. Immokalee Drive Immokalee Drive is a two-lane facility that runs west of SR29 to 15'street. There is a mixture of mobile home parks, single and multi -family structures, The Collier County sports complex and Immokalee High School and Middle School is located along this corridor. Several older mobile home parks that do not meet current standards are found along this corridor. There is limited street lighting or sidewalks along the local streets that intersect Immokalee. SR 29 Corridor This four -lane facility has been developed with highway commercial uses and is the main shopping area in the community. There is a mixture of new and old development along this corridor. The one grocery chain that is opened in the community is located in an older strip shopping center at the corner of Lake Trafford and SR29. Although a large number of residents do not have vehicle sidewalks are not available on both sides of the street and may not be. continuous. Lake Trafford The Lake Trafford area consists of the largest fresh water lake in Florida south of Lake Okeechobee. The lake is an integral part of the regional drainage and wetland systems, and coastal estuarine systems Economic and environmental enhancement of the lake necessitates the removal of an estimated 8.5 - million cubic yards of organic sediment from the lake to restore the lake's depth and bottom configuration to its quartz sand bottom; and reduce by as much as one half the nutrient enrichment to the take. This nutrient enrichment results in proliferation of aquatic plant growth, periodic algae blooms, and fish kills. The Lake restoration project should begin in 2000. The goal of the project is to improve, restore, and enhance the tourism attractiveness of Lake Trafford. Recreational fishing, bird watching, and photography can draw a significant number of visitors to an area. The Lake Trafford Marina currently operates the only small concession stand on the lake. The marina sells bait, rents small boats, and provides airboat tours of the lake. There is a County owned park, boat ramp and pier at the end of Lake Trafford. On the north side of the lake is a 2000 -acre, privately held ranch, The ranch does limited cattle and oil production. There is an older recreational vehicle park next to the marina. Airport and Industriall Park The Immokalee Regional Airport and Industrial Park consists of over 1000 acres. There is a pre approved master site development plan for the first Phase of development consisting of approximately 44 30 14 B 1 acres. The Airport Authority offers many incentives to businesses to locate in the industrial park. It is a i. designated as a Foreign Trade Zone, Florida Enterprise Zone and a Foreign Entrepreneurial Investment Zone. There is water and sewer available for phase I. A 10,000 square foot manufacturing incubator was opened in 1998 and is completely leased out. it has been difficult to recruit a business to open in this location given the.poor housing conditions and lack of .amenities in the community; A drag strip has opened at one end of the Airport and has been successful in drawing drivers and spectators. Farm workers Village Farm workers Village is located approximately 1.8 miles from the center of the community. The Village is owned and operated by the Collier County Housing Authority. There are 576 units built and 35 units planned but not yet built. The Village contains a small convenience store, -day care, and playgrounds. The first phase -of the development occurred in 1974 with 150 units. All the units are cement block. There is no public transportation available between the village and the commercial core of the community. Village Oaks Elementary School is located across from Farm Workers Village across SR 29.. A raised pedestrian bridge across SR 29 provides access between the village and the school Section 4.6 INFRASTRUCTURE NEEDS ASSESSMENT (AREA WIDE STREETS The roadway network east of SR -29 in the Immokalee community is primarily composed of local roads, which are configured in a traditional grid pattern. The area west of SR -29, North of Main Street could be best described as an incomplete roadway network. The Lake Trafford Road corridor contains an incomplete grid pattern, although the framework for one exists, Lake Trafford, which is beginning to experience periods of severe congestion, could be greatly improved if improvements were made to complete a basic grid network and widen this two-lane facility to accommodate boats and recreational vehicles. Eustis Avenue in South Immokalee provides east -west movement between 9t' Street and First Street - (CR -846). 1t continues approximately 1,500 feet East of First Street serving a small residential area. If Eustis Ave were extended to SR -29, it would provide an east -west alternative,and further support the grid concept. Bethune Avenue and south 9�' Street deadline in the south Immokalee area. The major arterial roadways are State Road 29, Immokalee Road and New Market Road (SR 29A). State Road 29 is a two-lane facility that widens to four lanes through the small downtown area. The four - lane segment is called Main Street and. is the focus of redevelopment and economic revitalization. It is the only segment with on -street parking and sidewalks on both sides. The two lane segments of State Road 29 north and east of Main Street are two lanes with no sidewalks. Trucks are encouraged to use New Market Road as an alternate to Main Street to avoid the downtown area. New Market Road is a two-lane facility. with 100 feet of right-of-way -and no sidewalks or paved shoulders. Remaining right-of-way and truck parking is limestone, Vegetable and fruit packing houses and the State Farmers Market are located along this street. Trucks use this street as a bypass road to avoid the downtown area and to -pick up goods for transport. The roadway is in poor condition and maintenance costs are high due to damage by trucks dragging limestone on roadway. Although many people walk or bicycle to work in this area, pathway facilities are unavailable. A loop road was purposed in 1991 during the preparation of the Immokalee Master Plan.. The road would provide relief to the downtown and neighborhood areas from trucks hauling produce to and from the packing houses. 31 14B 1 1 First Street (CR 846) intersects with SR 29 at the begin -ping of Main Street. It is four lanes south of Main Street with sidewalks on both sides. North of Main. Street it narrows to two lanes and has a sidewalk on the west side only, Major problems exist along many of the local roads. There are few sidewalks. Typical street widths are less than twenty feet and open storm water systems are adjacent to. roadways without paved shoulders or gudrdrails_. For example, south of State. Road 29, along 91h Street, there are deep, wide drainage ditches on both sides of the roadway. There are no sidewalks and no guardrails to safeguard pedestrians and motorists, The roadway width is eighteen feet and there are not. enough rights of way to construct pathway facilities without converting the open swales to a covered stormwater system SEWER AND WATER .Public potable water and wastewater -services are provided by the Immokalee Water and Sewer District. This district was created by a special act of the Florida Legislature. The District covers roughly twenty- seven square miles. Until 1989, special districts were largely autonomous and had little interaction with local governments, Beginning in 1991, each independent special district is required to submit an annual report to the appropriate local government, WATER While some households draw their potable water from private wells the vast majority of the Immokalee residents receive water from the Immokalee Water and Sewer District. Although the district boundaries extend 27 square miles, the actual service area is -much smaller. SANITARY SEWER Wastewater treatment is also provided by the Immokalee Water and Sewer District. The central wastewater collection, treatment and disposal system was designed in the late seventies and was constructed and in operation by 1982. The system which is comprised of 80 miles of sewer pipe, 34 sift stations, and a 2.5 MGD treatment. The district owns 640 -acre spray field and irrigates approximately 350 acres with treated effluent. However, the Immokalee Water and Sewer District is under a consent order from the Department of Environmental Protection due to insufficient handling of their effluent. The spray fields are inadequate. No new sewer hook-ups can be permitted unless the District can show a reduction of flow to the system. There are a few separate collection systems that were permitted prior to the creation of the district. Those systems need to be upgraded and included within the district's authority. Additional treatment plants and distribution lines will be needed to serve the entire community DRAINAGE Both man-made and natural drainage systems collect and transport surface water run-off which occur during and immediately following rainfall.' The two major facilities can function independently of one another or In combination. Due to the relatively flat topography of Immokalee, drainage occurs in sheet flow pattern within a very.shaliow but wide depression classified as a slough. Man-made facilities in Immokalee are typically large open swales. Surface water management problems are present within -the entire Immokalee study area. These problems include localized flooding in neighborhoods in the northeast section of the study area. Many local roads within the study area are poorly drained and experience flooding, as well. Some of the, roads are unpaved and poorly drained. In South I mmokalee, where a high concentration of rental units and pedestrian traffic occurs the typical open drainage ditch is 4 feet deep and 15 feet wide Surface water management problems are present within the entire Immokalee study area. These problems include 32 148 1 localized flooding in neighborhoods in the northeast section of the study area. Many local roads within the study area are poorly drained and experience flooding, as well. Some of the roads are unpaved and poorly. drained. In South Immokalee where a high concentration of rental units and pedestrian traffic occurs the typical open drainage ditch is 4 feet deep and 1.5 feet wide, ENVIRONMENTAL The Freshwater Marshes habitat around Immokalee is connected to the slough/swamp system known as Corkscrew Swamp Sanctuary and together the two habitats serve two primary purposes as primary water storage areas and drainage ways for surface flow. Undeveloped marshes should be preserved as part of the natural protection areas. Immokalee has good groundwater availability with good development potential of the water table aquifer. There are lands identified on the Immokalee Future Land Use Map as environmentally sensitive areas. This designation is for informational purposes only; it doesn't constitute new development standards and has no regulatory effect. ELEVATION There is not a flood map for the Immokalee community, Therefore, none of Immokalee is in a Flood zone as designated by the Federal Emergency Management Administration. The Immokalee Community as a whole is one of the highest points in the County, OPEN SPACE There is significant vacant land in the Immokalee Community. However, the majority of itis in/or has been in agricultural production. Most of the parcels are large and under one ownership. The cost of small parcels of land within in the community is considerable higher than comparable parcels in surrounding communities. However, there are opportunities for open space amenities. In terms of recreation use, the.lmmokalee community has six park facilities within the Study Area. Two are relatively passive parks containing picnicking facilities, benches, and observation areas. One is located next to the Airport (5 acres) and the other is at Lake Trafford (2.3 acres), - The remaining parks, Immokalee Community Park (23 acres) on Immokalee Drive adjacent to the High School, South Immokalee Park (3,2 acres) which houses the American Legion building and a baseball field, Tony Rosbough Park (6.8 acres) off of Little League Road has two baseball fields, and the Immokalee Recreation/Aquatic Facility (14 acres) located at the Immokalee Middle School site has a swimming pool and is considered a community park. There is a total of 54 acres presently in recreation use. in addition, the schools in Immokalee have their own recreation areas for physical education programs and interscholastic sports programs. Children under 14 years old comprise a significant percentage of Immokalee's total population: 29% or 3,186 people, according to the 1990 Census. Recreation facilities are necessary to meet the needs of this population. COMMUNITY FACILITIES PUBLIC SAFETY The Immokalee Community is served by the Immokalee Fire Control District. an independent fire district. The service encompasses 215 square miles. There are two fire stations. One station is located on Carson Road and the other is situated on New Market Road. Emergency Medical Service is provided by the County EMS department and has a station located on _. First Street (CR846). 33 146 1 The Collier County Sheriff's Department provides police protection to the community. In 1994 a new Immokalee substation was built at the Government complex in Immokalee. In 1996, there were 52 employees at the substation including road patrol and support staff. A community -policing program was initiated in 1996. Due to the young age of the population in the redevelopment there are several elementary schools in the area, along with a middle school and high school IMMOKALEE SERVICE AREA SCHOOLS (1) Early Childhood School: The Learning Center (2) Elementary Schools: Highlands, Lake Trafford, Pinecrest, Village Oaks (3) Middle Schools: Immokalee Middle (4) High Schools: Immokalee High (5) Adult Education: Bethune Education Center There is one County operated Library in the area Health Care There is not a hospital in the community. There is the Marion E. Feather Health Clinic that is affiliated with the Collier Community Hospital. 34 14B 1 Section 4.7 Redevelopment Area Goals Develop a circulation pattern for the community, which will provide safe and efficient access throughout the community. This network would include a loop road to provide the separation of commercial truck traffic from -tourist designated places and residential developments. Enhance the physical appearance of properties within the Main Street area. Provide opportunities for adequate, safe, and affordable housing. Encourage the development of both affordable rental and home ownership through rehabilitation and new construction. Develop a program to address the replacement of existing old mobile homes with newer mobile home units or module homes. Provide opportunities for capturing the tourist trade by creating eco -tourism opportunities at Lake Trafford, Peppers Ranch,. and Roberts Ranch. create adaptive development standards in each of the subdistricts identified in the Immokalee Overlay District to permit flexibility and incentives for redevelopment and development. Encourage neighborhood stability through the implementation of additional streetlights, sidewalks, and landscaping throughout the community. Improve the drainage system throughout the community and improve the appearance and function of the open drainage swales through out the community. Diversify the economy by encouraging the recruitment of businesses to the Immokalee Regional Airport and Industrial Park. Improve both the landside and airside facilities at the Immokalee Regional Airport and Industrial Park to meet the future demands for all forms of aviation and business development activities. Section 4.8 PHASE 1 - REDEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES Achieving the goals of the Immokalee Redevelopment Plan begins with a'focus,on South Immokalee, Main Street, New Market Road and the Immokalee Regional Airport and Industrial Park. The Plan focuses on Phase I activities (Year 1-5) and becomes more general into the future. Since planning is by nature an evolutionary process, each phase of activity attempts to build upon the successful outcome of earlier phases. Figure 6 identifies the areas of concentration during Phase I. Based on the analysis and the redevelopment goals the following activities were identified for.each of the redevelopment subareas in Phase is South Immokalee Prepare a Stormwater Master Plan for the area that identifies alternatives to the open drainage swales located throughout the subarea and begin implementation. 35 w m N Figure 4 ssv.� 36 5 Lb 4- 5 Lb t 14B 1 148 1 Develop a streetlighting plan for the area and begin to install streetlights in "hot spots" as identified by the . Sheriff's Department as high crime areas. Support the development of single family homes on the along the old Atlantic Coastline Railroad Right of Way by developing approved housing plans that meet the Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design Criteria and Traditional Neighborhood Design that are cost effective. Coordinate with the Collier County Housing Authority to develop these homes. Evaluate the current placement of commercial uses within the neighborhood, approximately from Boston Avenue south to Bethune Avenue and from 16th Street SE west to Ninth Street. Develop a program to encourage private property owners to renovate or demolish existing structures. Provide a rehabilitation or replacement of substandard housing within the neighborhood, Property may need to be acquired with in this subarea for the implementation of housing and economic development initiatives. Establish or coordinate with an existing non-profit corporation to promote neighborhood revitalization program including housing rehabilitation, land assembly, credit counseling and home maintenance. Promote the development of the One -Stop Career Center as a community focal point. Evaluate the need for neighborhood parks in the community and develop them as appropriate, Main Street Program Area Develop a program to eliminate the dust that accumulates along Main Street and in the landscaped medians, The program may include placement of sod or resurfacing parking lots. Leverage the Main Street Fagade program to encourage the private sector to renovate, demolish, or construct buildings within the Main Street Program area, Develop a Main Street Business Association to work on coordination and implementation of the redevelopment program. Develop a trash incentive program that will provide an incentive to pick up and properly dispose of empty containers and trash within the community. Property may need to be acquired within this subarea for commercial or residential development, Provide interconnection of sidewalks from the local streets perpendicular with Main Street to Main Street. Support the development of the Robert's Ranch Historical site as a tourist destination and a living museum. Encourage the development of appropriate, uses and buffers on the remaining portion of the home site. Provide for the rehabilitation or demolition of substandard housing. Coordinate with a non-profit corporation to coordinate marketing efforts to attract compatible businesses to the Main Street Area and improve the physical appearance, 37 4 6 1 i Develop a revolving ban fund for business start ups or expansion for businesses locating any where in the community. New Market Road Based on the Immokalee Transportation Study, identify the alignment for a loop road that will serve the industrial uses along New Market Road and relieve the western portion of New Market Road from truck traffic. Support expanding the uses of the State Farmers Market to allow for resale activities and encourage upgrading the fagade of the facility to make it more user-friendiy and a tourist destination. Develop incentives to diversify the agricultural production and expand production'to higher value crops. Encourage commercial infill and rehabilitation through flexible development standards and incorporate them into the Immokalee Overlay District, New Market Subdistrict. Lake Trafford Encourage the continued development and improvement to the Lake Trafford Marina and park to bring tourists into the area. Develop Pepper's Ranch and Preserve into an eco -tourism destination, promote transient lodging facilities and restaurants for this area. Revitalize the neighborhoods adjacent to Lake Trafford Road through a comprehensive housing improvement project that will include increase code enforcement, economic incentives for replacement and rehabilitation of mobile homes and the development or rehabilitation of single and multi -family structures. Install additional streetlights and sidewalks to increase safety in the area. Immokalee Regional Airport and Industrial Park Expand the Service Center at the Immokalee Manufacturing incubator to other businesses in the community Market the Foreign Trade Zane and Industrial Park. Develop sites, provide infrastructure; make lease payments, pay principal and interest on debt, buy equipment and any other items needed to re -locate or retain businesses in the Industrial Park. Provide infrastructure and participate in the cost of other facilities in the development of a motor -sports racing complex at the Airport. Develop standards for controls, restrictions and covenants, for the lease of [and and for land development regulations. Provided needed infrastructure improvements when necessary to recruit new businesses or to expanded existing businesses at the Airport/Industrial Park. 38 148 1 tVe'tghbarhood Revitalization/Housing Programs Establish a process to foreclose on properties that have tax liens and make that land available for affordable housing Develop incentives for the construction of new affordable housing in the community including reduced permitting fees, land costs, and processing time. Coordinate with Code Enforcement, the Sheriffs Department and the Department of Revenue to enforce existing. codes and develop new regulations that are appropriate to the needs of the community. Maintain, enhance or develop neighborhood parks throughout the community that are safe and convenient for the residents. Section 4.9 Future Phases Phase 11 - Years 5-10 Continued emphasis on economic development and public/private partnership to redevelop the Main Street Program area and the Immokalee Regional Airport and Industrial Park. Neighborhood Revitalization will continue and expand into the areas located off of Immokalee Drive and SR 29 The following activities are planned for Phase Il: o . Continue active marketing of the community as a tourist, destination. Activities could include assistance with land acquisition, public/private ventures for building improvements, and other marketing incentives. • Continue to support and coordinate with the Immokalee Beautification MSTU efforts and support the expansion of the MSTU boundaries to include the rest of the community . • Expand commercial rehabilitation grant to all other areas, • Continue land assembly for the development of new affordable housing • Continue to install streetlights and sidewalks and shade trees throughout the community. • Complete the construction of the Loop Road and other roadway improvements as needed to provide . the alternative truck route, moving the trucks out of Main Street. • Coordinate with the Parks and Recreation Department to maintain and improve open space and recreation opportunities in the community. • Coordinate with Farrmworkers Village to develop programs that move tenants from renter housing to homeownership. KH 14B 1 y Phase III -Years 10-20 Emphasis will be stabilization of neighborhoods and the economic vitality of the community. The following activities will be undertaken: • Continue land assembly for the future development of affordable housing and economic development. • Continued commercial rehabilitation for all areas. • Continued marketing of the area as a tourist destination. • Continue infrastructure improvements including roads, drainage, sewer and water expansion, and sidewalks • Continue neighborhood revitalization in all areas. 40 - 14B 1 Section 4.1 0 Neighborhood Impact Statement The structure of the Immokalee Redevelopment Plan was specifically organized to have a positive impact on housing and residential neighborhoods by providing incentives to rehabilitate and replace unsafe housing: The intensive redevelopment activities recommended in the plan concentrate on existing commercial and semi -industrial areas including the Immokalee Regional Airportflndustrial Park. With the specific objective of enhancing the existing residential neighborhoods of the area, the Immokalee Redevelopment Plan recommends a comprehensive approach to revitalizing neighborhoods. The .emphasis in the Plan Is to provide incentives to property owners to renovate or replace substandard housing. In addition to housing the following other improvements are recommended: Connecting local streets to improve internal circulation. Stimulating development of additional housing on vacant lots improving stormwater management. Improving sewer service to neighborhoods Improving interconnections between neighborhoods and commercial developments Improving trash collection in neighborhoods Providing pro:active code enforcement Installing streetlighting and landscaping to promote pedestrian activities Develop neighborhood parks that will provide recreational activities General Impacts: Since the provision of supportive services to existing residents and the additional low and moderate income housing in the area are primary objectives of the plan, the overall impacts of the proposed redevelopment program are expected to be positive, with few negative impacts anticipated. The proposed direct redevelopment activities are anticipated to displace a minimal amount of residents of affordable housing. It is anticipated that residents that may be temporarily displaced will have a better quality product to choose from due to the redevelopment efforts, Relocation: As stated above, the proposed redevelopment activities were specifically developed to minimize residential relocation. For any relocation that is required, this plan contains a proposed relocation policy that will provide supportive services and equitable financial support to any individuals or families that are subject to relocation ® Traffic circulation: The proposed street improvements in the community were conceived with the specific intent of reducing the negative impacts of inappropriate through traffic, The loop road is intended to reduce truck traffic in the New Market neighborhood and the Main Street area. Thereby improving the area. There should be minimal need for any relocation to build the loop road. Environmental quality: Water. Quality: The proposed redevelopment activities and the proposed stormwater master plan for the Immokalee community will serve to enhance stormwater quality in the area. The redevelopment activities will pipe and cover the open swales which are nuisance and health concern in the neighborhoods. ® -Availability of community facilities and services: A primary objective of the redevelopment plan is increased delivery of all types of community services. Therefore, the impacts of the proposed program should be positive. 'The primary community facility in the area is the Shadowlawn Elementary School. The proposed activities should have no negative impacts on the school. 41 48 Section 4.10 Proaram of Public Expenditures This section focuses on the public sector investment costs and sources of funds to carry out Phase I improvements for the Immokalee Redevelopment Plan. Discussion of the mechanisms for managing and packaging capital investments and the CRA redevelopment financing strategy is provided in Section 2 of this plan. The program of public expenditures (see Table One) summarizes the public expenditures to be made in the Immokalee redevelopment area. The Table identifies the projects, total costs (when available), local appropriations, and other potential sources of funding including Tax Increment Revenues. The Plan does not include specific allocation of tax increment revenues. Instead, the plan identifies tax increment revenues as a potential source of funding for redevelopment projects. The dollar amount for each project will be determined at a later date. Costs and funding sources will be refined with input from the Immokalee Redevelopment Advisory Committee and the program of public expenditures amended by CRA Board action when appropriate. TABLE One Proposed Publicly Funded Capital Projects and Other Proposed Projects Protect Name Total TIF Local Source Local Capital Projects Cost Funds Immokalee Football/Soccer $ 110,000 $110,000 AdValorem/ Impact Fees Robert's PUD/North 11th St. $ 170,000 $170,000 Gas Tax Immokalee Stormwater Master Plan $ 580,000 Grants Sidewalks $ 367,000 $367,000 MPO Immokalee Mobility Study $ 25,000 $25,000 MPO South Immokalee Stormwater Management Improvements TBDL MSBU/grants Streetlights TBDL MSTU/grants Land Acquisiton TBDL Grants Commercial Rehabilitation TBDL Grant, Main Street Housing Development TBDL Grants Permitting/Development Fees TBDL Marketing TBDL Grants Maln Street Program Parking Lot Improvements TBDL MSTU/grants Commercial Rehabilitation TBDL Grants Trash Incentive Program TBDL Grants 42 P48 1 TABLE One -continued Project Name Total TIF Local Funds Source Land Acquisiton TBDL Grants Perm itti n glDeve lopm ent Fees TBDL Sidewalks TBDL Grants/state/local Enclose drainage swales TBDL Grants/,state/local/MSB U Roberts Ranch Historic Site TBDL Grants/state/locallfed Marketing TBDL Grants New Market Road Loop Road Construction TBDL Impapt Fees/Grants/Gas Tax Renovation to,State Farmers Market TBDL Grants/state Zoning Overlay AdValorem Lake Trafford Marketing TBDL AdValorem Land Acquisiton TBDL Grants Permitting/Development Fees TBDL Grants Housing Development TBDL Grants Housing Rehabilitation TBDL Grants Streetlights TBDL Grants Sidewalks TBDL Grants Neicthborhood Revitalization Land Acquisiton TBDL Grants Permitting/Development Fees TBDL Grants Infrastructure Improvements TBDL Grants Landscaping TBDL Grants Park Improvements TBDL Grants 43 148 1 Table One Continued Immokalee Regional Airport & lmmokalee Regional Park P_roiect Name Total TIF Local Source Rehabilitate Runway 9-27 Lights $ 175,000 $ 35,000 Replacement and refurbishing of runway lights along Runway 9-27 Construct Taxiway - Phase 1 $ 162,500 $32,500 Construction of taxiway from runway system to new t -hangar building. Taxiway Phase 11 $ 162,500 $32,500 Construction of taxiway from runway system to new t -hangar building. Environmental Mitigation $ 55,000 $ 11,000 Remove wetland from proposed taxiway and t -hangar development area and mitigate for environmental impact. Bulk Storage Hangar $ 400,000 $200,000 Construct a bulk storage / maintenance hangar. T -hangar Building $ 500,000 $250,000 Construct a t -hangar building with taxilane. Bulk Storage Hangar $ 460,000 $230,000 Construct a bulk storage / maintenance hangar. T -hangar Building $ 455,000 $227,500 Construct a t -hangar building with taxilane, T -hangar Building $, 509,000 $254,500 Construct a t -hangar building with taxilane. 44 14:8. 1 Table One Continued project Tota! Cost TIF LOCAL SOURCE FUNDS T -hangar Building $ 475,000 $237,500 Construct a t -hangar building with taxilane. Conceptual ERP $ 350,000 $70,000 Rehabilitate Runway 18-36 $ 600,000 $120,000 Rehabilitate runway 9-27 - $ 600,000 $120,000 Rehabilitate Runway 18-36 to address safety issues. Expand Apron $ 350,000 $70,000 Rehabilitate Runway 9-27 to address safety issues. Expand aircraft parking demands to meet parking Demands. Emergency Generator $ 100,000 $20,000 Acquire and install emergency generator. U:S. Customs Facility $ 230,000 $46,000 Construct a U.S. Customs Facility and aircraft apron. Runway Extension - Design and DRI $ 250,000 $12,500 Phase Design and permit extension of Runway Runway Extension - Construction $ 1,750,000 $87,500 Construct extension of Runway Taxiway Phase 11 $ 162,500 $32,500 Construction of taxiway from runway system to new t -hangar building. Manufacturing Incubator Phase II $ 480,000 $48,000 Construct. a manufacturing assembly, wet processing bay and bonded storage facility. 45 146 1 Table One continued Projects Total Costs TIF local Source Funds Aiprak Boulevard Extension 1 $ 179,-000 $. 17,900 Extend roads and all utilities including, but not limited to, water main, sanitary sewer line, underground three-phase electric, telephone service and drainage swales along the entire length of road extension. Industrial Site Improvements $ 480,250 $ 48,025 Fill, grade and install primary drainage system on various airside and landside sites for future Development. $ 8,885,750 $ 2,202,925 Motor -sports Racing Complex Infrastructure Master plan project and construct restrooms, showers, campground facilities and spectator parking. I 46 148 1 I Section 4.11 'Valgation The current tax base of the Immokalee area, is based on tax assessment data from the Collier County Property Appraiser's Office is provided on the table below, The tax increment projections proposed are based a conservative three percent increase in taxable property values for the years 2000-2010. The three- percent is based on general historic and economic observations in the community. TAX DIFFERENTIAL ANALYSIS IMMOKALEE FROZEN COUNTY -WIDE Annual Cumulative PTAXABLE VALUE TAX BASE INCREMENT MILLAGE Tax Increment Tax Increment $148,127,163 $148,127,153 $0 4.0261 $0 $0 $162,980,141 $148,127,163 $4,455,732 4.0261 $16,997 $16,997 2001 $157,569,546 $148,127,153 $9,045,137 4.0261 $34,503 $51,500 2002 $162,296,632 $148,127,153 $13,772,223 4,0261 $52,535 $104,035 2003 $167,165,531 $148,127,153 $18,641,122 4.0261 $71,108 $175,143 2004 $172,180,497 $148,127,153 $23,656,088 4.0261 $90,238 $266,381 2005 $177,345,912 $148,127,153 $28,821,503 4.0261 $109,941 $375,322 2006 $182,666,289 $148,127,153 $34,141,880 4.0261 $130,236 $ 05,559 2007 188,146,278 $148,127,153 $39,621,869 4.0261 $151,140. $656,699 2008 $193,790,666 $148,127,153 $45,266,257 4.0261 $172,671 $829,370 2009 $199,604,386 $148,127,153 $51,079,977 4.0261 $194,848 $1,024,218 2010 $205,592,518 $148,127,153 ' $57,068,109 4.02611- $217,690 $1,241,908 Scenario Assumptions of Immokalee CRA: 1. Frozen Tax Base — Assumes the Community Redevelopment Plan is adopted in ,lune 2000. 2. The County -wide Millage Rate is based on FY99/00 Genera Revenue Rate of 3.5058 and the Unincorporated Rate of .5203. 3. A3% Annual Growth Rate is applied to years 2001-2010. 4. Annual Tax Increment is 95% of Total Tax Revenue. 47 SECTION 5 Bayshore Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Area Plan First Amendment !48 TABLE OF CONTENTS 5.0 Executive Summary ............................................................. ..........................5-E-1 5.0.1 Executive Summary............................................................I................5-E-1 5.0.2 Goals........................................................................................................5-E-1 5.0.3 Conceptual Plan Diagram........................................................................5-E-4 5.0.4 Character Areas.......................................................................................5-E-7 S.0.5 Focus of Redevelopment.........................................................................5-E-9 5.0.6 Prioritization & Funding........................................................................5-E-10 5.0.7 2000 & 2019 Plan Comparison..............................................................5-E-14 5.1 Introduction.......................................................................................................5-1-1 5.1.1 Vision ..............:....................................................................................5-1-1 5.1.2 Process.....................................................................................................5-1-1 5.1.3 Plan Organization....................................................................................5-1-1 5.2 Background.........................................................................................................5-2-1 5.2.1 Creation of the CRA Area........................................................................5-2-1 5.2.2 2000 Redevelopment Plan Goals and Projects.......................................5-2-1 L, I CRA 2019 P5 2 9 WW�55 General Requirements.......................................................................................5-5-1 5.2.3 Bays ore/Gateway Triang e erspective................................ - - 5.3 Planning Framework & Elements.......................................................................5-3-1 5.5.3 Acquisition, Demolition/Clearance, & Improvement..............................5-5-1 5.3.1 Conceptual Plan Diagram........................................................................5-3-2 5.5.4 Zoning & Comprehensive Plan Changes.................................................5-5-1 5.3.2 Land Use & Urban Design........................................................................5-3-7 5.5.6 Neighborhood Impact.............................................................................5-5-5 `5.3.3 Public Space, Parks, &Open Space.......................................................5 3-26 5.3.4 Development.........................................................................................5-3-31 5.6.1 Tax Increment Financing.........................................................................5-6-1 5.3.5 Transportation, Connectivity, & Walkability.........................................5-3-42 5.6.2 Municipal Service Taxing Units(MSTUs).................................................5-6-2 5.3.6 Infrastructure ........................................................................................5-3-59 5.3.7 Process...................................................................................................5-3-66 5.3.8 Character Areas.....................................................................................5-3-67 5.4 Prioritization Plan...............................................................................................5-4-1 5.4.1 Prioritization of Projects & Initiatives......................................................5-4-1 may._ 5.4.2 Financing Planning...................................................................................5-4-1 5.4,3 Projects& Initiatives Prioritization.........................................................5 -4-5 ' 5.4.4 Coordination & Partnerships WW�55 General Requirements.......................................................................................5-5-1 5,5.1 Overview of Relevant Statutes................................................................5-5-1 5.5.2 Consistency with the County's Comprehensive Plan..............................5-5-1 5.5.3 Acquisition, Demolition/Clearance, & Improvement..............................5-5-1 5.5.4 Zoning & Comprehensive Plan Changes.................................................5-5-1 5.5.5 Land Use, Densities, & Building Requirements.......................................5-5-1 5.5.6 Neighborhood Impact.............................................................................5-5-5 5.5.7 Safeguards, Controls, Restrictions, & Assurances...................................5-5-5 56 Tax Increment & MSTU Estimates......................................................................5-6-1 5.6.1 Tax Increment Financing.........................................................................5-6-1 5.6.2 Municipal Service Taxing Units(MSTUs).................................................5-6-2 5.6.3 Underlying Assumptions.......................................................................5-6-12 This page is intentionally left blank. Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 146 i II! EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5.0.1ct The Bayshore Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Area Plan amendment provides an updated long-term vision and approach for the redevelopment of this component area (see Map 5 -ES -1). The Plan brings together information gathered from technical analysis, fieldwork observation, and public and agency outreach (documented in further detail in a separate Assessment Memo). From these efforts and the resulting themes identified, an overarching vision emerged for the future of the Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) and this component area: 4 m 0 P 4 k 00 R N� d 8 9 8 0 W i 4 6* 0@ k& 0 k 0 W 0 0 N W 0 W 0 W V 0 0 9 Promote quality of life and eco�minic Vitality with a mixed -income, urban, inulti-modal community, that welcomes visitors, cultivates the area's artistic and cultural identity, uplifts unique local destinations, and finds balance with the natural environment, The Redevelopment Area Plan lays out a framework of goals, objectives, and strategies organized thematically in support of this overall vision, along with a list of projects to carry out the framework. This plan is meant to provide a palette of options, generated by the technical analysis, fieldwork observations, and public and agency outreach, that the CRA can further explore. Consequently, not all of these suggestions will necessarily be carried through to full implementation. Full implementation of approaches and projects will be based on further study of capacity, technical feasibility, and public priorities. 5.0.2 Goals The main goals of the Plan include: Land Use & Urban Design Promote a defined, harmonious, and urban visual and land use character tailored to the CRA area, cultivating its unique artistic and cultural identity. Public Space, Parks, & Open Space Ensure accessible, activated, and well-maintained public spaces, parks, and open space. Development Foster and guide private development to enhance community character and provide increased stability and prosperity for community members. Transportation, Connectivity, & Walkability Ensure safety, comfort, and convenience for various methods of transportation within and connecting with the CRA area Infrastructure Provide effective infrastructure that preserves environmental and neighborhood design quality through coordinated improvement planning and funding. Process Carry out CRA area planning and implementation efforts to engage and serve the various communities within the CRA area. Figure 5 -ES -1 provides a Concept Diagram focused on location -specific capital improvement projects, followed by a list of non -location -specific capital improvements projects and a description of non - capital projects (e.g., plans, studies, grant programs). 5-E-1 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 Map 5 -ES -1: Boyshore Gateway Triongle CRA Study Area --DAVIS BLVD -- AVE.___ 14B EXECUTIVE SUMMARY V/j AM 're THOMASSON DR KAREN DR 4,.- est kVaPles 41, 0, n i a, communi n BARRETT AVE Q4 0, - CRA Boundary 121 Collier County Government Center LU cc ANDREWS AVEC City of Naples within CRA 0 V1 CO sugaen V/j AM 're THOMASSON DR Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 I KAREN DR est kVaPles 41, 0, n i a, communi 0, - CRA Boundary 121 Collier County Government Center :q'.' 4i ANDREWS AVEC City of Naples within CRA -7 Park a, J, ... .... wetlands J, _7 City of Naples il. AJ& '4w 4 M4 Al, Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 I 5.0 5-E-3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This page is intentionally left blank. Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 148 1 L JPd �euoiAad uapOn5 b T 5 z Y m o7i j a o � c �.: �LL F i.✓!. � f0 e k. i MBI��P�j C H c ` c O O v W U NQ u `0 u u° N V a2 O O O O 0 N C 0 N _o m na o t7 m i7 O (tee !, i Klied ., (j ■ i )U3'24111170,) is saIdeN 1se3 HO NOSSVWOHI , JPd �euoiAad uapOn5 0 m ci i i Sti}ff b 5 z �y B� m v j 0 m ci i i Sti}ff b 5 �y B� m �.: �LL F i.✓!. � f0 e k. i MBI��P�j C O v o p a Q QQ m NQ w _o m na o t7 m i7 O (tee !, i ., (j r 4 w N LU X LU Q m u C w - m 0 Im Y C (d 4J T c 0 C: v C cu 0o m Q F- 00 n L v `o v L E c- o Z u N c0 L CL cu aQ u d C to F - m a m v `o m i c 0 v N c ? o cc >. c c v E u° o _ o ~ L a E> > - g m 3 a v o c o a 0 v O LV= 3 a L Q d OG o w Y u v v v v A c?> c ¢ m R Ea v >¢ E o V °o v t E E 3 m o E m m m ✓moi V a Q� 2 a a ¢ A ¢ i u o w Li U d m ti o w Li Y C (d 4J T c 0 C: v C cu 0o m Q F- 00 n L v `o v L E c- o Z u N c0 L CL cu aQ u d C to F - m a m v `o m i 0 v c ? o >o E v O - - o. E o a 0 v Y C (d 4J T c 0 C: v C cu 0o m Q F- 00 n L v `o v L E c- o Z u N c0 L CL cu aQ u d C to F - m a m v `o m i 14 B EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Non -Location Specific Capital Projects Project Type Project Name Public Space, Parks, & Open Space A. Pocket Park Land Acquisition & Development B. General Parks Improvements C. Community Safety/Clean-Up and Neighborhood Initiatives General Improvements Development A. Land Acquisition for Community Land Trust Transportation, Connectivity, & A. Sidewalk Gap Improvements Walkability B. Bicycle Infrastructure C. Street Sign/Wayfinding Improvements D. General Multi -Modal Improvements Infrastructure A. Water Main and Fire Suppression Upgrades B. Stormwater Improvements C. Upgrade Sanitary Sewer Lines Non -Capital Projects Projects and initiatives that are not capital investments include a variety of plans, studies, and grant programs in support of redevelopment or capital project planning throughout the CRA area. These non - capital projects and initiatives include: CRA operating expenditures and administrative updates Land Development Code updates Development support for catalyst development sites Master planning for: • Stormwater improvements • Arts and culture -oriented development and redevelopment efforts • Implementation of Complete Streets projects • Community safety and clean-up • Branding • Marketing and communications • Water and fire infrastructure improvements Feasibility studies, including: • General market study/economic profile • Bayshore Drive Complete Street technical feasibility • Bayshore Drive Complete Streets pilot project • Triangle retention pond improvements • Micro -enterprise and arts incubator Grants and funding programs, including: • Residential improvements grants/loans • Commercial fagade improvements • Wall and fence funding for areas with incompatible uses • Public art funding • Economic development incentives • Mobile home replacements • Community Land Trust housing construction • Other affordable/workforce housing investments Other non -capital expenditures that may arise in the future and are not yet identified Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 i .0 146 1 I 1*4111aLYMMla11r, Areas5.0.4 Character The Redevelopment Area Plan framework can be tailored to different sub -areas depending on their specific character, needs, and opportunities. Map 5 -ES -2 lays out these different sub -areas, or "Character Areas" with accompanying descriptions. Mini Triangle/Davis • The Mini Triangle, including CRA -owned parcel, is a major commercial redevelopment opportunity and Focus Development Node • Corridor commercial along Davis • Linwood Avenue another potential area for redevelopment. Airport Pulling • Mix of corridor commercial, larger big -box style retail, and County Center • Part of area currently designated as an Activity Center in Future Land Use Map dstar • Residential is primarily condos and single- family homes in gated communities • Includes golf course designated as a commercial use South Bayshore • Primarily single-family residential neighborhood with Naples Botanical Garden • Wetland considerations for development eShadowlawn • Primarily a residential neighborhood with mix of apartments/duplexes and single-family homes around Shadowlawn Elementary • Borders US 41/Bayshore Drive Focus Intersection (asterisk), a gateway between north and south sections of CRA area earniami • Corridor commercial and residences, including two major malls, Gulfgate Plaza and Courthouse Shadows) • Borders US 41/Bayshore Drive Focus Intersection (asterisk), a gateway between north and south sections of CRA area ONorth Bayshore • Focus Corridor along Bayshore Drive with neighborhood commercial (including Haldeman Creek Entertainment Center near Creek) • Mix of multi- and single-family residential • Focus Intersection at Bayshore/Thomasson with planned roundabout • CRA -owned Focus Development Node (17 - Acre Site) ■ ■ ■ ■ Focus Corridor Focus Development Node/Intersection Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5.0.5 Focus of Redevelopment The following provides a focus of redevelopment for each Character Area based on the specific characteristics described in Map S -ES -2 and the most relevant redevelopment strategies. 1. Mini Triangle/Davis • Urban -style mixed use commercial redevelopment, including capitalization on the Mini Triangle as a catalyst development site and urban -style parking solutions • Park development at retention pond site • Complete Streets design and commercial redevelopment along Linwood Ave and other nearby commercial roadways; pedestrian scale street design between Mini Triangle, Linwood Ave, and the proposed retention pond park • Improved access to Mini Triangle development from US 41, Davis Blvd, and Linwood Ave • Multi -modal connectivity: • Across Davis Blvd • Between Mini Triangle, Linwood Ave, proposed retention pond park, and eastern Triangle neighborhood • To Downtown Naples potentially via Davis Blvd, US 41, and Gordon River Bridge improvements • Additional infrastructure improvements: sanitary sewers, electrical, stormwater 2. Shadowlawn • Residential structural enhancement and upgrades • Avoidance of incompatible uses • Transitional elements between different uses use • Infill development on vacant residential lots • Flooding and drainage on neighborhood streets • Complete Street improvements along Shadowlawn Drive 3. Airport Pulling • Transitions between residential neighborhoods and commercial development • Eventual street enhancements, particularly connectivity across Airport Pulling Rd • Commercial fagade improvements 4. Tamiami • Connectivity to Downtown Naples via US 41 • Redevelopment of Courthouse Shadows • Tenant opportunity and site improvements for walkable design at Gulfgate Plaza 5. Windstar • Complete Streets and MSTU improvements along major community roadways, including Bayshore Drive, Thomasson Drive, and Hamilton Avenue • Access to Bayview Park 6. North Bayshore • Corridor commercial development along Bayshore Drive, including Haldeman Creek Entertainment Center near Creek and creative parking solutions • Larger redevelopment opportunities of 17 -Acre Site and Del's 24 property • Arts and culture -oriented development • Transitional elements between corridor commercial and residential areas along Bayshore Drive and Thomasson Drive • Development of vacant residential lots Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 1 • Neighborhood Complete Streets and trails • Connections between Sugden Regional Park and CRA area • Water main and fire suppression upgrades Flooding and drainage on neighborhood streets 7. South Bayshore • Mobile home and single-family home residential improvements, upgrades, affordability • Development of vacant residential lots • Access to Bayview Park • Connections between CRA and uses to the east, including East Naples Community Park • Wetland, flooding, and site preparation considerations for development • Roadway improvements to meet County engineering standards • Neighborhood Complete Streets Prioritization The Redevelopment Area Plan includes a prioritization plan recommending projects for the period through 2030 (11 years after the adoption of the amended Plan), the period for which tax increment financing (TIF) funding will be available. The remaining project recommendations are included for longer term implementation post -2030 and will require alternative funding sources aside from TIF. The Plan provides an overview of potential alternative funding sources. Table 5 -ES -1 summarizes projected revenues through 2030 for various funding sources currently operating in the CRA area, including Municipal Service Taxing Units (MSTUs) that are potential funding sources independent of TIF (dependent on coordination with and approval from the respective MSTU advisory boards). Note that the MSTUs do not have a sunset 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY date and will likely continue past 2030. However, for the purposes of the capital and non -capital planning effort, no projections have been made for years after 2030. This Plan does not obligate any funding to any projects listed. It provides a guide and list of both capital and non -capital projects that require approval by the CRA Advisory Board within the initial 11 -year programming period and allocation through the standard operating and procurement guidelines adopted by the Collier County Board of Commissioners if TIF revenues are to be used for funding. Approval by relevant decision-making bodies is required for other funding sources outside of TIF. Projects may also require additional vetting and piloting to better understand technical feasibility, impacts, and broader County implementation priorities prior to approval for implementation. To this end, planned projects include technical feasibility studies and pilot projects. As a result, this capital and non -capital funding plan is subject to change as it is re- evaluated. Additionally, the Plan sets a framework based on current conditions but allows for flexibility in phasing of projects based on funding opportunities and community priorities identified in annual work plans and capital improvement project lists. Figures 5 -ES -2 and 5 -ES -3 summarize the expenditure breakdown by timeframe and type of project/ initiative. Note that non -capital projects include studies, plans, and grant programs. Table S -ES -2 compares projected TIF revenues and costs (note that some projects are programmed at a deficit because other funding partners or sources are anticipated, including after 2030 when TIF revenues will cease). Table 5 -ES -3 shows CRA project costs that may also be eligible for Bayshore Beautification MSTU funds, indicating the potential benefit from MSTU coordination. Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 C '~ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Table s*S-1:Revenue Projection Summary 14B Tax Increment Financing (TIF) Bayshore Beautification MSTIJ $20,193,000 TBD Haldeman Creek MSTU $1,762,000 TBD I The TIF funding will sunset in 2030, so no TIF revenues are shown after 11 years. The MSTUs do not have a sun- set date and will likely continue past 2030. However, for the purposes of this planning effort, no projections have been made for years after 203O. ����2: Short-term costs by project type |8nd Use& []rban Public Space, Parks ,& Open Space, Design, <165,OOO,O% $1,050,000, 3% 8ayxhoreGateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2U19 148 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Figure 5 -ES -3: Long-term project costs by type Public Space, Parks, & Open Space, Land Use & $3,144,404, 4% Urban Design, Development, Non-Car)ital, $37,500,0% "$4,062,500, 5% Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 5-E-12 5. 5-E-13 14B EXECUTIVE SUMMARY i Table 5 -ES -2: Summary of CRA Project Costs and Projected TIF Revenues s� Total Capital Costs - North of US 41 (Triangle) $44,945,859 $4,709,998 $40,235,861 Total Capital Costs - South of US 41 (Bayshore) $45,878,936 $7,790,481 $38,088,455 Total Capital Costs $90,824,795 $12,500,480 $78,324,316 Total Non -Capital Costs $28,616,116 $21,881,116 $6,735,000 Total TIF Revenue $33,790,000 $33,790,000 $0 Difference -$85,650,911 -$591,595 -$85,059,316 Notes: revenues rounded to thousands 'Overall costs increased by 25% to account for annual increases. The TIF funding will sunset in 2030, so no TIF revenues are shown after 11 years. Table 5 -ES -3: Summary of MSTU-Eligible Costs and Projected MSTU Revenues Note: Projects are considered MSTU-eligible based on those that align with accepted uses of Bayshore Beautification MSTU funds accord- ing to Ordinance No. 2013-68; revenues rounded to thousands 'Overall costs increased by 25% to account for annual increases 2The MSTUs do not hove a sunset doteandwill likely continue past 2030. However, for the purposes of this planning effort, no projec- tions have been made for years after 2030. Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 148 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5.03 2000 019 Plan Comparison Table 5 -ES -4 assists in comparing the 2000 Plan to the amended Redevelopment Area Plan, showing a status update for the various areas and initiatives identified for Tax Increment Finance (TIF) funding in the 2000 Plan, as well as how the Redevelopment Area Plan update responds to the identified initiatives. Note that two additional redevelopment sites, Naples Plaza and Naples Steel, were identified for private redevelopment without TIF assistance (now Naples Bay Club/Cottages at Naples Bay Resort and Woodspring Suites, respectively). While the 2000 Plan has a strong orientation around these sites and initiatives, the updated Redevelopment Area Plan is oriented around general themes of: Land Use and Urban Design; Public Space, Parks, & Open Space; Development; Transportation, Connectivity, & Walkability; Infrastructure; and Process. As a result, the amended Redevelopment Plan contains additional considerations that may not stem directly from the 2000 Plan, including but not limited to: • A focus on the CRA -owned 17 -Acre Site west of Sugden Regional Park for catalyst redevelopment • A focus on arts and culture in the CRA area redevelopment vision • Connections to nearby parks • Land use transitions between incompatible uses and densities/intensities • More comprehensive infrastructure improvements Table 5 -ES -4: Status of Key Land Use Areas and Initiatives of the 2000 Plan Catalyst Redevelopment Projects Triangle- Hotel/ Parcel at apex currently vacant; CRA -owned Restaurant/ property under contract for sale and Office received PUD zoning for Mixed -Use project. Triangle –Flex Current mix of commercial and industrial Office/ uses. Warehouse Specific planning tasks included for Mini Triangle and IargerTriangle area with associated improvements (primarily roadway, infrastructure, and land use transitions) and incentives identified that are generally supported by the Redevelopment Area Plan (see Sections 5.3.2, 5.3.4, 5.3.5, and 5.3,6); general development support is also funded in the non -capital projects (see Section 5.4) Specific planning tasks included for Mini Triangle and larger Triangle area with associated improvements (primarily roadway, infrastructure, and land use transitions) and incentives identified that are generally supported by the Redevelopment Area Plan (see Sections 5.3.2, 5.3.4, 5.3.5, and 5.3.6); general development support is also funded in the non -capital projects (see Section 5.4) Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRAArea Plan—May 2019 5-E-14 Table S -ES -4 (continued): Status of Key Land Use Areas and Initiatives of the 2000 Plan Catalyst Redevelopment Projects (Continued) Gulfgate Plaza currently has tenants; consideration needs to be given to type of establishments desired for this space. A small business incubator might be a good use for vacant office on second floor. Identified as an opportunity for new tenancy in second floor space and to incentivize optimal tenant mix and walkable design; Courthouse Shadows is another large commercial space providing a redevelopment opportunity (Section 5.3.4) Entertainment bridge and south of creek; food truck park recently changes to facilitate commercial development Center opened on north side of creek under same such as that in the Bayshore area (Section (Haldeman ownership as Three60 Market. Need for 5.3.4); commercial parking solutions explored Creek) commercial parking has emerged as an issue in (Section 5.3.5, Section 5.4) this area. Neighborhood Focus Initiatives The 2000 Plan initiative included the following: • New general housing and affordable housing • Rehabilitation of affordable housing • Neighborhood gateway features • Traffic calming by closing part of Linwood • Extension of Pelton Ave to Linwood for improved internal circulation Current status: The Shadowlawn improvements delayed due to recession, warranting prioritization of current study and improvement implementation approach for area. However, some stormwater planning and improvements completed for area (see General Infrastructure Improvements section below). CRA will generally aim to continue these Neighborhood Focus Initiatives. Neighborhood enhancement focused on structural upgrades, limiting uses incompatible with the redevelopment vision, transitions between uses/intensities, infill development on vacant lots, addressing flooding/drainage, and complete streets/transportation improvements that will address streetscape elements such as lighting and traffic calming. These improvements will likely require strategic property acquisition and demolition of structures for redevelopment. Other relevant initiatives include gateway design and coordination with County sheriff, code enforcement, and housing agencies to address quality and supply of housing and streetlighting. See section 5.3 for more information. Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 14B EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Table S -ES -4: Status of Key Land Use Areas and Initiatives of the 2000 Plan Bayshore Neighborhood Focus Initiatives (Continued) The 2000 Plan initiative included the following: • Landscaping and beautification along Bayshore Drive • New affordable housing • Rehabilitation of market -rate and affordable housing • Botanical Gardens relocation • Design of new neighborhood park and connection to Sugden Park site • Sabal Bay development (pending legal actions) Current related efforts include: • Beautification and roadway improvements planned for Hamilton Ave and Thomasson Dr, funded by the Bayshore Beautification MSTU. • Additional stormwater planning and improvements completed for area (see General Infrastructure Improvements section below). • Residential units have been built; substandard housing has been demolished. CRA will generally aim to continue these Neighborhood Focus Initiatives. Redevelopment focus for this neighborhood split into North and South. North focus: commercial/catalyst site development, parking, arts and culture, transition between residential and commercial, residential infill, comprehensive street improvements that will address elements such as streetlighting and traffic calming, park connections (Sugden Regional Park). South focus: residential upgrades and affordability, residential infill, park access (East Naples Community Park, Bayview Park), wetlands/ flooding considerations, roadway standards. These improvements will likely require strategic property acquisition and demolition of structures for redevelopment. Other relevant initiatives include additional street/transportation improvements to address elements such as lighting and traffic calming, as well as coordination with County sheriff, code enforcement, and housing agencies to address quality and supply of housing and streetlighting. See Section 5.3 for more information. Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 5-E-16 5.0 Need for stormwater improvements identified for entire CRA area, so planning and improvement efforts have included both Triangle and Bayshore neighborhoods, including the following: • Stormwater plan created for Gateway Triangle residential area in 2009 and for Bayshore MSTU area in 2011. Recommendation made to update stormwater management plan for the entire CRA area (Section 5.3.6) Davis Resurfacing and certain safety improvements Recommendation to coordinate on future currently programmed in FDOT Transportation improvements with FDOT to develop and incorporate a Improvement Program. community vision for comprehensive Complete Streets improvements along this corridor (see Section 5.3.5). Resurfacing project beginning as part of FDOT Transportation Improvement Program Roundabout will be put in at Bayshore and Thomasson as a Bayshore Beautification MSTU project. Bayshore Dr needs to be considered for streetscape and roadway updates via the Bayshore Beautification MSTU. Recommendation to coordinate on future improvements with FDOT to develop and incorporate a community vision for comprehensive Complete Streets improvements along this corridor (see Section 5.3.5). Drive and evaluate opportunity to underground Other TIF -Funded Projects Specific planning tasks included for the 17 -Acre Site that highlight in particular connections to Sugden Section 5.4). catalyst development. m 5-E-17 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 201 • Karen Dr stormwater improvements completed in 2017. • Pineland Ave stormwater improvements completed. Last major dredging project was in 2006. Depth assessment will be conducted for creek, Haldeman and capital reserves currently being Recommendation made to coordinate the capital Creek and accumulated for future maintenance or improvements of the MSTUs, including that used to Canal System dredge efforts. Advisory Board voted to increase millage rate to create dredging plan maintain Haldeman Creek, in a Capital Improvements Dredging Plan when major dredge will be needed; the Plan (Section 5.3.7). millage increase to 1 mil was approved at the final budget hearing on September 20, 2018. Roadway Improvements Davis Resurfacing and certain safety improvements Recommendation to coordinate on future currently programmed in FDOT Transportation improvements with FDOT to develop and incorporate a Improvement Program. community vision for comprehensive Complete Streets improvements along this corridor (see Section 5.3.5). Resurfacing project beginning as part of FDOT Transportation Improvement Program Roundabout will be put in at Bayshore and Thomasson as a Bayshore Beautification MSTU project. Bayshore Dr needs to be considered for streetscape and roadway updates via the Bayshore Beautification MSTU. Recommendation to coordinate on future improvements with FDOT to develop and incorporate a community vision for comprehensive Complete Streets improvements along this corridor (see Section 5.3.5). Drive and evaluate opportunity to underground Other TIF -Funded Projects Specific planning tasks included for the 17 -Acre Site that highlight in particular connections to Sugden Section 5.4). catalyst development. m 5-E-17 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 201 INTRODUCTION 5.1.1 Vision The 2019 Redevelopment Area Plan provides an updated vision and approach for the redevelopment of the Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA area in Collier County (see Map 5-1-1). The Plan brings together information gathered from technical analysis, fieldwork observation, and public and agency outreach (documented in further detail in a separate Assessment Memo). From these efforts and the resulting themes identified, an overarching vision emerged for the future of the CRA area: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 Promote quality of life and economic vitality with a mixed -income, urban, multi -modal community that welcomes visitors, cultivates the area's artistic and cultural identity, uplifts unique local destinations, and finds balance with the natural environment, This vision provides the guidance for the overall framework and projects laid out in this Redevelopment Area Plan for furthering the revitalization of the CRA area. This Plan is meant to provide a palette of options, generated by the technical analysis, fieldwork observations, and public and agency outreach, that the CRA can further explore. Consequently, not all of these suggestions will necessarily be carried through to full implementation. Full implementation of framework strategies and projects will be based on further study of capacity, technical feasibility, and public priorities. 14B 1 The technical analysis involved in the Redevelopment Area Plan process included a review of the existing plans related to the CRA area, as well as spatial and quantitative analysis of data related to the CRA area. The study team also conducted fieldwork to collect additional information and "ground -truth" findings in the data. The public and agency outreach consisted of stakeholder and agency meetings and calls, two public workshops, and a boat tour of Haldeman Creek and adjacent canal areas. Figure 5-1-1 illustrates the complete planning process. 5.1.3 Plan .off The remaining sections of this Plan cover the following topics: • Section 5.2: Background – historical overview of the CRA area, including the original 2000 CRA Plan and status update • Section 5.3: Plan Framework & Elements – framework of goals, objectives, and strategies related to redevelopment in the CRA area, with supporting information on existing conditions, opportunities, and approaches for carrying out strategies • Section 5.4: Prioritization Plan – information on revenues; capital project funding and phasing; and planning, administrative, and regulatory initiatives • Section 5.5: General Requirements - information on additional regulatory requirements for the CRA Plan and conclusion • Section 5.6: Tax Increment & MSTU Estimates— provides methodology and underlying assumptions for tax increment and Municipal Service Taxing Unit (MSTU) revenues. Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan–May 2019 148 INTRODUCTION Map 5-1-1: Boyshore Gateway Triangle CRA Study Area Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Are Plan—May 2019 5-1-2 It ! DAVIS BLVD—,.. 94 KIRKWOOD AVE LINWOOD AVE j 92/j = Cr 41 moot z d ,, x f alu y _ m BARRETTAVE 'Vs �k v QI 1 � � p .1 Sugden Regional (VC) Parke r a� ,.:: All 7. s ;IionnassaNDR :> < ` KAREN DR — Naples East Naples ': v4 `c" Botanical ' `community _... Garden 'air Axl = N Bayuiew.... Park — m, _ :... `.�Yi �x slit Q CRA Boundary Collier County Government alp a ANDREWS AV Center _ 1ta r ,, � Cit of Nale Naples within CRA Park J Wetlands ..'... J City of Naples v , ,,i, 07, _ Map 5-1-1: Boyshore Gateway Triangle CRA Study Area Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Are Plan—May 2019 5-1-2 It 5.1 /000 5-1-3 INTRODUCTION Figure 5-1-1: Planning Process "Rola Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 1 o02 gg� W, 1p IN, o02 5.2.1 Creation of the CRA The Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA area is located primarily in unincorporated Collier County to the southeast of the city of Naples (a small portion of the area is in the city of Naples, see Map 5-1-1). It is near the popular destinations of Downtown Naples and coastal beaches and is bisected by US 41, a major regional thoroughfare. This corridor defines two major sub -areas within the larger CRA boundary --the Gateway Triangle community north of US 41 and the Bayshore community south of US 41 (see Map S-1-1 for CRA area and Resolution 2000-82, Exhibit A at end of this document for a legal description of the CRA boundary). The CRA was created in 2000 under the jurisdiction of Collier County to facilitate the physical and economic revitalization and enhancement of the community. Its creation was based on documenting conditions of blight in a Finding of Necessity study, as required by Florida Statute 163.340. Table 5-2-1 provides an overview of the findings. 5.2.2 2000 Plan Goals and The 2000 Plan laid out visual concept goals and corresponding redevelopment projects to improve conditions in the CRA area. The projects were planned out in phases over a 20 -year time span. Map 5-2-1 shows the overall Land Use Plan illustrating general land uses and significant activity centers. The Land Use Plan suggested a basic regulatory framework that would guide Future Land Use Map and zoning amendments to support the redevelopment of the 14B 1 CRA area. In addition to the Land Use Plan, the 2000 Plan provided an Urban Design Framework to illustrate the following: 1. Primary areas anticipated to undergo significant change via redevelopment or infill development, receive improvements via neighborhood improvement strategies, or remain as stable and planned development areas 2. Basic site design conditions recommended to implement the vision defined in the public outreach process 3. Primary corridors and areas recommended for landscape/streetscape improvements in support of the vision defined in the public outreach The primary areas anticipated to undergo significant change included: • Triangle area approximately defined by US 41, Davis Blvd, and a line based on the projected alignment of Pine St to the north of US 41 • Naples Plaza (southwest of Davis Blvd and US 41 intersection) and adjacent properties • Gulfgate Plaza as a Town Center • Commercial uses on Naples Steel properties (along US 41) and other properties on Gulfgate • Residential uses south and west of Gulfgate • Infill: • Multi- and single-family residential in Shadowlawn neighborhood • Commercial uses for Haldeman Creek entertainment center • Mixed multi -family and commercial uses along Bayshore Drive north of Lake View (Lakeview) Dr • Residential and commercial at Bay Center Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 BACKGRQUN Inadequate street layout and • Shadowlawn Dr design (including sub -standard . Thomasson Dr street widths) • Most local streets • Davis Blvd Commercial parking problems • Airport Rd • Bayshore Rd • US 41 Predominance of defective or Lack of streetlights along major Major arterials inadequate street layout - arterial and most local streets • Most local streets Davis Blvd • Shadowlawn Dr Lack of sidewalks • Bayshore Rd south of Thomasson Rd • Most local streets Lack of neighborhood connections . Residential neighborhoods • US 41 Commercial lots . Davis Blvd Faulty lot layout in relation to size, • Between Pine St and US 41 adequacy, accessibility, or Built density far below approved • RMF -6 residences in Gateway usefulness density Triangle area Not meeting lot standards in at • RMF -6 residential properties least one respect . Bayshore area residences Disproportionate lack of plumbing Unsanitary or unsafe conditions Disproportionate overcrowding 2 unsafe structures _ Lack of sidewalks and streetlights Poor drainage of local roads, Deterioration of site or other surface water management improvements problems Lack of right-of-way for improvements along Shadowlawn Dr No public transportation provided Other problems in CRA area Housing affordability noted as an issue in the county and as an issue that could get worse in the CRA area Table 5-2-1: Findings of Blighted Conditions in CRA Area Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 5-2-2 area (Bayshore and Thomasson) • Other opportunities in the Medium Intensity residential area of Land Use Plan The public outreach of the 2000 Plan defined the establishment of a Neighborhood Focus Initiative as a programmatic objective. The aim of such a program was "to coordinate the direction of a variety of public and quasi -public services to enhance major residential portions of the project area." The primary neighborhoods for improvements specified in the 2000 Plan included: • Bayshore • Shadowlawn The primary areas for stability and planned development with low -intensity residential included: • Windstar • Sabal Bay (Hamilton Bay) development Site design standards included: • Roof patterns reflective of Old Florida architectural style • Placement of buildings close to street to support pedestrian activity • Use of rectilinear block pattern to strengthen predominant established character of area • Placement of parking to rear of development sites The following lays out items covered by the visual preference statement from the public outreach effort of the 2000 Plan, which supported the design standards: • Buildings – representing an "Old Florida" or "Cracker" style with covered porches, metal roof, and dormers • Signage – representing low, monument -style sign 11. 4 B with business logogram (representative sign or character) suppressed to design of sign's background and surrounding landscape planting • Pathways – representing sidewalk set back from curb by distance greater than width of walk and with planting materials and low pedestrian lighting provided between walk and curb • On -Street Parking – representing street with narrow planted median and use of angle parking interspersed with planting areas on both sides of street • Landscaping – representing street with landscaped median and landscaping and decorative lighting fixtures on edges • Public Spaces – representing pedestrian area with palms and large pool with water jet fountain In terms of landscape and streetscape improvements, the design framework focused on: • Treatments for major roadways, including: • Davis Blvd • Airport Pulling Rd • US 41 • Bayshore Dr • Thomasson Dr Significant gateway intersection designs at intersections of the above streets as well as: • Shadowlawn Dr south of Davis and North of US 41 • Linwood Ave at Airport Pulling Rd • Pelton Ave north of US 41 • Intersection proposed at time of Sabal Bay's main east/west street with Bayshore Dr Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 1 4 BACKGROUN .A ILLUSMATIWVpw Revelopment Plan Land Wo: rv�wn Center I Node D—Ovelopraeot Activity Centers 00 (URI Roglanal W4cr moderate ETown Center Entodshmenti Mb* Uve Ho4of f Oftel Oommwtu Oft0a) warehouse Medium W'Oftity Ij Map 5-2-1: Land Use Plan from 2000 CRA Plan Note: Additional labels have been added to clarify location of certain sites and neighborhoods. Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 5-2-4 24B 1 Table 5-2-2 provides a status update for the various areas and initiatives identified for Tax Increment Finance (TIF) funding in the 2000 Plan, as well as how the Redevelopment Area Plan update responds to the identified initiatives. Note that two additional redevelopment sites, Naples Plaza and Naples Steel, were identified for private redevelopment without TIF assistance (now Naples Bay Club/Cottages at Naples Bay Resort and Woodspring Suites, respectively). While the 2000 Plan has a strong orientation around these sites and initiatives, the updated Redevelopment Area Plan is oriented around general themes of: Land Use and Urban Design; Public Space, Parks, & Open Space; Development; Transportation, Connectivity, & Walkability; Infrastructure; and Process. As a result, the updated Redevelopment Plan contains additional considerations that may not stem directly from the 2000 Plan, including but not limited to: • A focus on the CRA -owned 17 -Acre Site west of Sugden Regional Park for catalyst redevelopment • A focus on arts and culture in the CRA redevelopment vision • Connections to nearby parks • Land use transitions between incompatible uses and densities/intensities • More comprehensive infrastructure improvements Catalyst Redevelopment Projects Triangle- Hotel/ Parcel at apex currently vacant; CRA -owned Restaurant/ property under contract for sale and Office received PUD zoning for Mixed -Use project. Triangle —Flex Office/ Current mix of commercial and industrial Warehouse uses. Gulfgate Plaza currently has tenants; Town Center consideration needs to be given to type of (Gulfgate Plaza) establishments desired for this space. A small business incubator might be a good use for vacant office on second floor. Table 5-2-2: Status of Key Land Use Areas and Initiatives of the 2000 Plan Specific planning tasks included for Mini Triangle and larger Triangle area with associated improvements (primarily roadway, infrastructure, and land use transitions) and incentives identified that are generally supported by the Redevelopment Area Plan (see Sections 5.3.2, 5.3.4, 5.3.5, and 5.3.6); general development support is also funded in the non -capital projects (see Section 5.4) Specific planning tasks included for Mini Triangle and larger Triangle area with associated improvements (primarily roadway, infrastructure, and land use transitions) and incentives identified that are generally supported by the Redevelopment Area Plan (see Sections 5.3.2, 5.3.4, 5.3.5, and 5.3.6); general development support is also funded in the non -capital projects (see Section 5.4) Identified as an opportunity for new tenancy in second floor space and to incentivize optimal tenant mix and walkable design; Courthouse Shadows is another large commercial space providing a redevelopment opportunity (Section 5.3.4) Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 14B 1ACKGROUND Catalyst Redevelopment Projects (Continued) Three60 Market has been established west of Entertainment bridge and south of creek; food truck park recently Recommendations made to evaluate LDC Center opened on north side of creek under same changes to facilitate commercial development (Haldeman ownership as Three60 Market. Need for such as that in the Bayshore area (Section Creek) commercial parking has emerged as an issue in 5.3.4); commercial parking solutions explored this area. (Section 5.3.5, Section 5.4) Neighborhood Focus Initiative Shadowlawn The 2000 Plan initiative included the following: • New general housing and affordable housing • Rehabilitation of affordable housing • Neighborhood gateway features • Traffic calming by closing part of Linwood • Extension of Pelton Ave to Linwood for improved internal circulation Current status: The Shadowlawn improvements delayed due to recession, warranting prioritization of current study and improvement implementation approach for area. However, some stormwater planning and improvements completed for area (see General Infrastructure Improvements section below). CRA will generally aim to continue these Neighborhood Focus Initiatives. Neighborhood enhancement focused on structural upgrades, limiting uses incompatible with the redevelopment vision, transitions between uses/intensities, infill development on vacant lots, addressing flooding/drainage, and complete streets/transportation improvements that will address streetscape elements such as lighting and traffic calming. These improvements will likely require strategic property acquisition and demolition of structures for redevelopment. Other relevant initiatives include gateway design and coordination with County sheriff, code enforcement, and housing agencies to address quality and supply of housing and streetlighting. See section 5.3 for more information. Table 5-2-2 (continued): Status of Key Land Use Areas and Initiatives of the 2000 Plan Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 5-2-6 5.2 . BACKGROUND 0", NN 5-2-7 '4B 1 Bayshore Neighborhood Focus Initiatives (Continued) The 2000 Plan initiative included the following: • Landscaping and beautification along Bayshore Drive • New affordable housing • Rehabilitation of market -rate and affordable housing • Botanical Gardens relocation • Design of new neighborhood park and connection to Sugden Park site • Sabal Bay development (pending legal actions) Current related efforts include: • Beautification and roadway improvements planned for Hamilton Ave and Thomasson Dr, funded by the Bayshore Beautification MSTU. • Additional stormwater planning and improvements completed for area (see General Infrastructure Improvements section below). • Residential units have been built; substandard housing has been demolished. CRA will generally aim to continue these Neighborhood Focus Initiatives. Redevelopment focus for this neighborhood split into North and South. North focus: commercial/catalyst site development, parking, arts and culture, transition between residential and commercial, residential infill, comprehensive street improvements that will address elements such as streetlighting and traffic calming, park connections (Sugden Regional Park). South focus: residential upgrades and affordability, residential infill, park access (East Naples Community Park, Bayview Park), wetlands/ flooding considerations, roadway standards. These improvements will likely require strategic property acquisition and demolition of structures for redevelopment. Other relevant initiatives include additional street/transportation improvements to address elements such as lighting and traffic calming, as well as coordination with County sheriff, code enforcement, and housing agencies to address quality and supply of housing and streetlighting. See Section 5.3 for more information. Table 5-2-2 (continued): Status of Key Land Use Areas and Initiatives of the 2000 Plan Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 ■ General Infrastructure Improvements Other TIF -Funded Projects Botanical Gardens is now located southwest Botanical of the Bayshore Drive/Thomasson Drive Gardens intersection. The CRA currently owns the Support 17.89 -acre site ("17 -Acre Site") west of Sugden Regional Park; the site is targeted for catalyst development. Specific planning tasks included for the 17 -Acre Site that highlight in particular connections to Sugden Regional Park and a performance space (see Section 5.3.4 and capital and non -capital improvements in Section 5.4). Table 5-2-2 (continued): Status of Key Land Use Areas and Initiatives of the 2000 Plan' Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 5-2-8 Need for stormwater improvements identified for entire CRA area, so planning and improvement efforts have included both Triangle and Bayshore neighborhoods, Triangle including the following: Stormwater • Stormwater plan created for Gateway Recommendation made to update stormwater Management Triangle residential area in 2009 and for management plan for the entire CRA area (Section Plan Bayshore MSTU area in 2011. 5.3.6) • Karen Dr stormwater improvements completed in 2017. • Pineland Ave stormwater improvements completed. Last major dredging project was in 2006. Depth assessment will be conducted for Haldeman creek, and capital reserves currently being accumulated for future maintenance or Recommendation made to coordinate the capital Creek and dredge efforts. Advisory Board voted to improvements of the MSTUs, including that used to Canal System y increase millage rate to create dredging plan maintain Haldeman Creek, in a Capital Improvements Dredging Plan when major dredge will be needed; the Plan (Section 5.3.7). millage increase to 1 mil was approved at the final budget hearing on September 20, 2018. Roadway Improvements US 41 Zoning Resurfacing and certain safety improvements Recommendation to coordinate on future Overlay and currently programmed in FDOT improvements with FDOT to develop and incorporate a Landscaping Transportation Improvement Program. community vision for comprehensive Complete Streets improvements along this corridor (see Section 5.3.5). Davis Boulevard Resurfacing project beginning as part of FDOT Recommendation to coordinate on future Streetlighting Transportation Improvement Program improvements with FDOT to develop and incorporate a and Zoning projects. community vision for comprehensive Complete Streets Overlay improvements along this corridor (see Section 5.3.5). • Roundabout will be put in at Bayshore and Thomasson as a Bayshore Recommendation included to make Complete Streets Bayshore Drive Beautification MSTU project. comprehensive roadway improvements along Bayshore Landscaping • Bayshore Dr needs to be considered for Drive and evaluate opportunity to underground streetscape and roadway updates via the overhead utilities (see Section 5.3.5, Section 5.3.6, and Bayshore Beautification MSTU. capital funding in Section 5.4). Other TIF -Funded Projects Botanical Gardens is now located southwest Botanical of the Bayshore Drive/Thomasson Drive Gardens intersection. The CRA currently owns the Support 17.89 -acre site ("17 -Acre Site") west of Sugden Regional Park; the site is targeted for catalyst development. Specific planning tasks included for the 17 -Acre Site that highlight in particular connections to Sugden Regional Park and a performance space (see Section 5.3.4 and capital and non -capital improvements in Section 5.4). Table 5-2-2 (continued): Status of Key Land Use Areas and Initiatives of the 2000 Plan' Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 5-2-8 Section 5.2.3 and Sections 5.3 and 5.4 provide more information on these additional considerations and their basis. Triangle CRA 2019 Perspective Many of the challenges and efforts identified in the 2000 Plan are still relevant today. The following are some of the major ideas emerging from the Redevelopment Area Plan update process, which provided the basis for the goals, objectives, and strategies underlying the framework (see Section 5.3) for this Redevelopment Area Plan: • Improving the compatibility of uses and appearance of the public realm • Transitioning between suburban and urban development style • Balancing regional vs. local transportation needs and related transportation safety concerns along major roadways; incorporating a focus on multi- modal transportation • Developing in the context of natural conditions and hazards (wetlands, Coastal High Hazard Area, flooding), including how to address increased density/intensity • Capitalizing on the valuable assets of the area or nearby, including parks, natural areas such as the canal system and Naples beaches, proximity to Downtown Naples, and tourism while also creating public spaces that can be claimed by the community 5-2-9 14 B Stimulating investment and capitalizing on development opportunities while also providing support and protections for existing residents Navigating various perceptions of and visions for the area and incorporating arts and culture into the vision; marketing this vision Transition between higher -density multifamily housing and lower -density single-family housing Artistic and cultural elements of the CRA area include murals Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 1 5.3 5,3 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS This page is intentionally left blank. Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 146 i M L Z, C � ai > CL O u 5i3v o m Qj 4 C C c O m u "O p G O ai .y � Y E c `o v a u `O � u CL E s mo v -o ocvo� w u c c v m v o?> a �- °' v acv E v a m `o w ■ I<d A}titnku buv,} ldtN �m, "�'"'�'? HO NOSStlWOHl 3 J °« w n. 0 65 m� Y 5i3v o m r � o v c Y n E s mo v -o ocvo� u° m '3" o w v o?> a �- °' v acv E v a m `o w 15 V � n' Z v« E a° acv c °— v m �O p L+ W N .m 0 L« v 3 .I o Y Q 0 m C \ to w v o Y tt L) O v v E""" c w m v E v' m a-° m C� r G H Z E a 3 l�/ u U 1118 Slnva _ a J °« w n. 0 65 m� Y 5i3v o m Lcc.ti ti N v c Y n E s mo v -o ocvo� u° m '3" o w v o?> a �- °' v acv E v a m `o w 15 n' Z v« E a° acv c °— v m �O p L+ W N .m 0 L« v 3 .I o Y Q 0 m C to w v o Y '� — o L) m�... v v E""" c w m v E v' m a-° m H vo o a u« -m E Ln r z w J w Y O 3 2' - RC 2 i6 C7 Z z z 4 J CL L6 1 O 3 O O O V \ x L a J N a' ¢' C T d L L c o d m E.o a o c o o N m Q 'O a O Qd j m 3 O H vvi C d L F Y d D. m c m m O v _ Q N L O a a a> o u m p a v W C _ a' m O o10 Q o v v o V N N I v a' a N o U 0 0 H m m m � .� o v v ti E E Y v -> a °o ti z u u , �- v o. v GJ S O L F - F- ,oa a w C L C in m N V Y a U N 3 T >iC m p m m -o v�1 vhf V C "O O E D. Q 3 S a_ v v �. U '9 -� 0 C d of u o u, a ¢ d c; ti o uJ u: d m Li o u, u: 0 d cd ci d m it o w ate• c CL m m O u o H .1c d u a E v w w o w 0 C. y 'o p v a (n ; n E v t v o E v r o o. o > E E m m y v a l7 E D a V u Z d J AWL "al""' r z w J w Y O 3 2' - RC 2 i6 C7 Z z z 4 J CL L6 1 FRAMEWORK & LAPS 5.3 Non -Location Specific Capital Projects Project Type Project Name Public Space, Parks, & Open Space A. Pocket Park Land Acquisition & Development B. General Parks Improvements C. Community Safety/Clean-Up and Neighborhood Initiatives General Improvements Development A. Land Acquisition for Community Land Trust Transportation, Connectivity, & A. Sidewalk Gap Improvements Walkability B. Bicycle Infrastructure C. Street Sign/Wayfinding Improvements D. General Multi -Modal Improvements Infrastructure A. Water Main and Fire Suppression Upgrades B. Stormwater Improvements C. Upgrade Sanitary Sewer Lines Non -Capital Projects • General market study/economic profile s Projects and initiatives that are not capital . Bayshore Drive Complete Street technical investments include a variety of plans, studies, and feasibility grant programs in support of redevelopment or Bayshore Drive Complete Streets pilot project • capital project planning throughout the CRA area. These non -capital projects and initiatives include: • Triangle retention pond improvements CRA operating expenditures and administrative • Micro -enterprise and arts incubator updates Grants and funding programs, including: Land Development Code updates • Residential improvements grants/loans Development support for catalyst development sites Commercial fagade improvements Master planning for: • Wall and fence funding for areas with • Stormwater improvements incompatible uses T • Arts— and culture -oriented development and • Public art funding redevelopment efforts • Economic development incentives • Implementation of Complete Streets projects . Mobile home replacements • Community safety and clean-up . Community Land Trust housing construction • Branding Other affordable/workforce housing investments • Marketing and communications Other non -capital expenditures that may arise in the • Water and fire infrastructure improvements future and are not yet identified Feasibility studies, including: Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 ,f 5-3-5 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 14B I Future Land Use Densities 12 UPA via density pool units (with cap of 97 density pool units per project); limits apply for projects that do not comply with the requirements for this density increase. The Mini Triangle Catalyst Site is an exception with a maximum of 12 UPA and is not subject to the 'This definition is interpreted broadly to mean properties that can gain access to the road(s), whether directly (access point on the road) or via one or more other roads; it is not viewed narrowly to mean have an access point onto the rood(s). As a result, this definition encompasses all properties in the Bayshore Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Overlay except those on east side of Airport Road. 9 Y g ff, prop Y f 9 ( ) f p f h zAccordin to Collier Count Growth Mana gem sta ,such ro erh'es must literal) have ronta eon abut one or more o the s eci ed roads. 5-3-6 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 x, density pool unit requirements. Within this site, there is a Mini -Triangle Subdistrict that was approved through Ordinance No. 2018-23 which amended the Growth Redevelopment Overlay— Management Plan and Ordinance No. 2018-25 which amended the Land Development Properties with access to US 41 Code creating the Mini -Triangle MPUD to allow for construction of up to, with a mix to East/Bayshore Dr/Davis Blvd (84)/ be determined by maximum allowable traffic generation, the following development west side of Airport -Pulling Rd' plan: • 377 multi -family dwelling units • 228 hotel suites • 150 assisted living units • 200,000 square feet of commercial uses inclusive of 60,000 square feet of self - storage and 30,000 square feet of car dealership Residential only: 8 UPA via use of density bonus pool (with cap of 97 density pool units Redevelopment Overlay— per project). Eligibility requires that the project: Properties having frontage on 1. shall be a Planned Unit Development (PUD) one or more of Bayshore Drive, 2. shall be a minimum of 3 acres Davis Boulevard, Airport- Pulling 3. shall be redevelopment of a site Road (west side only) or US 41 4. consist of all market -rate units East2 Limits apply for projects that do not comply with the requirements for this density increase. Urban Residential Subdistrict Maximum residential density determined through Collier County's Density Rating (outside Redevelopment Overlay) System, but shall not exceed 16 UPA except in accordance with Transfers of Development Rights in the Land Development Code. To facilitate hurricane evacuation and protect the adjacent environmentally sensitive Conservation designated area, residential densities within the Subdistrict shall not Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict exceed a maximum of 4 UPA, except as allowed in the Density Rating System to exceed 4 (outside of Redevelopment UPA through provision of Affordable Housing and Transfers of Development Rights, and Overlay) except as allowed by certain Future Land Use Element Policies under Objective 5 in the Growth Management Plan. New rezones to permit mobile home development within this Subdistrict are prohibited. Rezones are recommended to be in the form of a PUD. 'This definition is interpreted broadly to mean properties that can gain access to the road(s), whether directly (access point on the road) or via one or more other roads; it is not viewed narrowly to mean have an access point onto the rood(s). As a result, this definition encompasses all properties in the Bayshore Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Overlay except those on east side of Airport Road. 9 Y g ff, prop Y f 9 ( ) f p f h zAccordin to Collier Count Growth Mana gem sta ,such ro erh'es must literal) have ronta eon abut one or more o the s eci ed roads. 5-3-6 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 x, 148 1 PLANNING FRAK8EVVORK& ELEMENTS 01 OMI The Growth Management Plan and Land Development Code (LDC)provide tools toshape land use and urban design, which have adirect impact onthe built environment ofanarea. This sectJonhighlights existin8 ounditons related to various land use types' as well as ways topromote adefined, harmonious, and urban visual and land use character tailored 10the CRA area, cultivating its unique ardsticand cultural identity. 0°°=°°°°°°°.°..������ °°°�°°�°°°°°° ���� ���� / Promote a defined, harmonious, and urban visual and land use character tailored to the CRA area, Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 14B 1 aEXISTING CONDITIONS ........................................................ Existing Residential LandCharacteristics The CRA area has 3,814, dwelling units according to Florida Department of Revenue 2017 data. These units include a range of housing types from mobile to larger single-family to multi -family homes (see Map 5-3-2 and corresponding images). This diversity of types, when coupled with a range of price points, can accommodate a diversity of residents living in the community. Currently, streets such as Jeepers Drive (picture 3 below) show areas of transition between larger residential and smaller residential, as well as between smaller single-family residential and multi -family on nearby streets. The vision set forth in the Redevelopment Area Plan aims to guide these transitions towards the desired built environment character laid out for different sub -areas (see Section 5.3.8). im Mobile home Single-family housing Small single-family near large new single-family with guest house Gated community housing Small multi family housing a 5-3-8 murn jammy housing Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 14 B�. PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS ,ps, 5.3' 'm. I ' JE�'� li DAVIS BLVDIF f f 84 KIRKWOOD AVE �,j lrti I t LINWOOD AVC 1 i t- f �q. p Cr y 1 } 90tj b , 41]I 41 tr f 1G niQ a-� 13J[ BARRETT•AVE uS[- f:� - t s®� Mp �. �sT� n_ Sugden ¢ �R`Regional14�: e it. " m�VD Park . �i, n 3 rrtnlr i*. •. I y 1. f � %` I TH0MASS0N DR= w� { a ,ull 4T�i OWTV pKAREN DR ! —Is East Na les ` ,.z Naples l .; P Boianlcal Communtty oI rr*3arden�.,uI� Park + ! ..: ❑ Single Family Residential t8 f m�rrr � a l - Ba VI24V m a I � 1 ' '. ..., ,f, ._•.._ ., t ._.. ' � Mobile Home ' �'"•-- .. _ - Multi -Family Residential - y i c. : . ANDREWS-AVEC alt [� Property Parcel U1 > s : ,;,w"•"" �_ ill i Wll >Ju f •' � CRA Boundary .• rk a s!, a >f , f u Wetlands W " :: �.._ '. SkUi •� •.. �lillt ' - ..: ' ..- City of Naples 0 .r .r.: ._ �f .:::. lil — .� ._ _• .... ... :_. nl Map 5-3-2: Existing Residential Land Use Characteristics; Data source: 2017 Florida Department of Revenue Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 5-3-9 5.3 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 148 1 R, STING CONDITIONS ......................................... Existing: ial & Industrial Lard Use Characteristics As with housing types, there are a range of commercial types in the CRA area (see Map 5-3-3 and corresponding images). Many commercial sites include on-site, street-facing surface parking. The area contains two major mall-style commercial spaces, Gulfgate Plaza and Courthouse Shadows. Uses range from restaurants and retail stores to heavier uses such as auto services. Industrial uses are also present in the Triangle area and northwest of Sugden Park. mall commercial—Courthouse Shadows Linwood Avenue commercial Multi -story strip commercial Vertical mixed-use Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 ' 1INWOOD AVE Al { I q�7�r 148 1 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS Map 5-3-3: Commercial & Industrial Land Use Characteristics with Non -Residential Existing Land Use; Data source.: 2017 Florida Department of Reve nue Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 5-3-12 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 14B i Existing Community -Oriented Uses Community -oriented uses support community -building and provide services via government, faith -based, non-profit, and other entities. The Redevelopment Area Plan aims to preserve and enhance these uses. Government establishments in the area include the Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area office, a Naples Fire Rescue station, and the County Center (see Map 5-3-4 and corresponding images). Schools in and near the area include Avalon Elementary, Shadowlawn Elementary, and The Garden School of Naples (a Montessori school). There are also various arts -oriented spaces, places of worship, and non-profit service providers. Evaluating locations for a library or other public meeting space can also facilitate the addition of community services and spaces. Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Office Avalon Elementary School Opera Naples East Naples Baptist Church Greater Naples Fire Rescue—Station #22 Catholic Charities Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 e14 B I PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 5-3-14 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS Objective 1: Promote urban -style development. • Strategy 1: Coordinate with Collier County Growth Management and Zoning Divisions to pilot innovative land use and zoning approaches to promote more urban -style development in the LDC. These approaches might include: • Increasing mixed use designations • Focus increased densities/intensities along improved roadways (with consideration of Coastal High Hazard Area restrictions) • Roadway design standards to support multi -modal transportation (see Section 5.3.5) • Reduced building setbacks • Zoning for live/work spaces • Zoning and incentives for accessory dwelling units • Flexible parking regulations Strategy 2: In awarding density pool units, establish eligibility requirements and/or performance metrics that promote these urban approaches. Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 14B 1 Character Images Local Mix Use Promote use of guest houses (shown herein back of main house) as a way to provide additional density and potentially address affordability 4—B I PLANNING FRAMEWORK ELEMENTS 19 ADDITIONAL INFOPMATION Local multi -family housing styles Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 5-3-15 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS Objective 2: Achieve consistent land uses in the CRA area and sub -areas. • Strategy 1: Use sub -area ("Character Area") characteristics (see Section 5.3.8) to guide land use vision in the CRA area. • Strategy 2: Amend the LDC to limit heavy commercial and manufacturing/warehouse/storage uses throughout the CRA area; evaluate incentives to encourage transitions away from heavy commercial and manufacturing/warehouse/storage uses. • Strategy 3: Identify elements in the LDC to create clear transitional areas and land use buffers between uses that are incompatible (see Figure 5-3-2); coordinate buffers with related improvements, such as landscaping improvements via the Bayshore Beautification MSTU. • Strategy 4: Provide funding through CRA -funded grant programs for transitional structures (e.g., walls and fences) between incompatible uses. Provide guidance in the program guidelines to coordinate with related elements, such as design standards and Bayshore Beautification MSTU improvements. • Strategy 5: Provide clear guidance in the LDC for new and emerging uses to ensure consistency with the respective Character Areas. Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 146 1 5-3-16 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 146 1 140. PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS .»R&R.0... ADDITIONALINFORMATION Land Use Transition Types There are four main types of land use strategies to transition between differing land use types (Figure 5-3-2). Factors affecting use of any given type might include characteristics of the particular site or the general Character Area. GREEN/OPEN SPACE 7. 17 1 m :; Residentiol INTENSITY OF USE Nalutolleatutes PubficSouore Mixed -Dear' Figure 5-3-2: Land Use Transition Types �r`caarfi�c�ct Ctxt�tr�►r�:ttt Ast���*t1•tic�' C�ssarrte,�rrc2f Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 5-3-17 M 14-B 1 Elements to facilitate transitions can be helpful where there are dissimilar uses, built forms, or development styles. Strategies range from land use buffers (e.g., gradual transition in density/intensity, open space buffers; see Figure 5-3-2), physical barriers (e.g, walls, fences, landscaping), or limitations placed on uses incompatible with the area's land use vision. Map 5-3-5 shows the generalized base zoning districts, highlighting areas with use boundaries that might benefit from transition strategies. The highlighted areas are described further below. Focus: transition from interior residential area of Triangle to the major commercial corridors surrounding it Strategies: • Put in place land use transition areas of lighter commercial or multi -family residential near single- family residential areas • Promote use of physical barriers/buffers between heavier commercial uses and residential uses • Limit heavier industrial and commercial uses in the Triangle area Focus: transition from commercial to residential and between different residential densities Strategies: • Establish land use transition areas to transition from commercial and denser multi -family along Bayshore Drive to moderately dense multi -family residential to single-family residential Focus: put in place transition strategies to mesh new development coming online with existing uses Strategies: • Establish land use transition areas Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 PLANNING FRAM 5. FRAMEWORK &IMAIR Map 5-3-5: Needed Land Use Transitions with Base Zoning Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 N i BLVD 84 m KIRKW00 LI OD AVE -- T71i'-z I: 2j 0 I i 4 ' so I r �i (fit l........JI II 1 • 1 � a � cu • � 1 f - t� s 11�4� i- Sugden ont SpR ; Regional Park _ ryal�Yl9tI>�I� Iyl�Iil �I'. Commercial ;, KARR City of Naples J Ne Ie P fti�: Fast Naples Mobile Home otanica) Community t, I m MPUD PUD 6ayvlew. ' F �' " • i! �� L 1�J Residential Multi -Family park. .. Res. PUD MU Res. Subdist r Single -Family Residential xdk^ �'a . `. Village Residen tial m Ix ANt Dmµ ETMW$�AVE I ��? Property Parcel sx••t A1hy ' ?' • '. CRA Boundary - ark ` alt :' il(t lY - _ i e.. _ Wetlands City of Naples nJ Av' Aee. Wev W .. i i 0._ Y ! 1St!! 1tt' �i4 t)�; 3,lfr .. �Lli, s Map 5-3-5: Needed Land Use Transitions with Base Zoning Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 5.3f PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 5-3-20 € TIG CONDITIONS ...... Identifying boundaries between different existing zoned building heights can indicate areas where land use transition approaches may be helpful. Map 5-3-6 shows the applicable Mixed Use Overlay Districts that provide more detailed design standards for the CRA area with highlighted transition areas from Map 5-3-4 and maximum zoned heights of buildings in the table below. Note that there are exceptions for certain structures in the code (e.g., church spires, antenna). PUD sites are governed by zoning in their respective ordinances. BMUD-NC 42 42 42 56 56 42 BMUD-W 42 42 42 56 56 42 BMUD-R1 35 35 35 35 BMUD-R2 35 35 35 35 BMUD-R3 35 30 35 35 35 BMUD-R4 35 35 GTMUD-MXD 42 42 42 56 56 42 GTMUD-R 35 35 35 35 ■ ■ ■ ■ i Needed Transition Area Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 0 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS Strategy 6: Evaluate opportunities for arts -oriented code flexibility that will incorporate existing arts activity such as gallery space. Objective 3: Achieve a consistent design character in the CRA area and sub -areas that cultivates the area's unique artistic and cultural identity. • Strategy 1: As part of a CRA -specific Arts and Culture Plan (see Section 5.3.4, Objective 1, Strategy 5), develop a comprehensive design approach for the public realm with reference to specific Character Areas. The approach might consider: Architectural styles, including resilient designs that better manage natural hazards such as flooding Transitional elements between Character Area designs, building mass types, etc. (see Section 5.3.8) Design considerations for gateway/focus intersections Design considerations for public art Identification of public art opportunities and incentives Design considerations for streetscape improvements in coordination with the Bayshore Beautification MSTU Master Plan Design considerations for CRA -funded grants for fagade and other exterior improvements Incorporation of urban -style development design standards (see Section 5.3.2, Objective 1) Airport Zone height restrictions Strategy 2: Fund a commercial fagade grant program for exterior improvements to commercial buildings not targeted for major redevelopment. 1) ADDITIONAL INFOPMATION Character Images for Design Style A number of buildings in the CRA establish a modern architectural style that the CRA can promote in public realm design; there are a number of residences with a more traditional Florida style that the CRA can also promote. Art that is incorporated into private development, but visible in the public realm, can also contribute to the community character conveyed in the physical environment (see the character photos on the facing page). In addition to architectural style, sign styles can be considered as part of public realm design. Figure 5-3-3 provides potential sign design options for the Bayshore neighborhood of the CRA area, reflecting the style of existing infrastructure. The CRA can promote a more modern design for the Triangle area in the commercial areas targeted for redevelopment. Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 1 148 1 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 5.3 ADDITIONAL INFOPMATION Local residence with modern design style Modern design of Ankrolab Brewing. Co. tsource: Htevel Modern design of The Garden school (source: carbon Architects, http:ilhlevel.infolprojectlankrolab_ bre) Architecture/Planning/Sustainability, http;ll w rg_col) wwwdavidcorbancomlthe-garden-school/) Opera Naples with modern design style Local residential design Local residential design Local residential design Local residential design Art in the public realm on Bayshore Dr Figure 5-3-3: Sign Design Examples Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 Tndale:tOlivrer 5-3-23 A Att"ibutes Public realm design in the area is important given the emphasis on arts -oriented development and input from public outreach efforts indicating architectural style as a way of building a sense of place and community. The Bayshore Beautification MSTU has contributed significantly to the design of the southern portion of the CRA area with streetscape improvements including lighting, flags, landscaping, and the design of the Bayshore/Thomasson roundabout. The CRA should coordinate with the MSTU for further improvements, including the design of major gateway intersections that can include signs and public art (see Map 5-3-7 for opportunities). Note that gateway intersection opportunities north of US 41 would not qualify for Bayshore Beautification MSTU funds, yet the northern Triangle area can explore the creation of its own MSTU to fund these and other types of improvements (see Section 5.3.7, Objective 3, Strategy 2). Existing gateway design near US 41 and Bayshore Drive Bayshore Drive/Thomasson Drive roundabout rendering "t 5-3-24 Bayshore Drive flag, lighting, bike lane, landscaping, pavement treatments MSTU Improvements Gateway Design Opportunities d Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & EM Map 5-3-7: Design Treatments & Attributes Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 5.3 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 5.3.3 Public Space, Parks, & Open Space Public space, parks, and open space types of land use that serve an important community -building purpose with particular design considerations given the variety of activity they can support. This section focuses on how to ensure accessible, activated, and well- maintained public spaces, parks, and open space. O ............ftp$000, GOAL .............. t7nsure accessible, activated, and well-maintained public spaces, parks, and open space. Pedestrian connection between Boyshore neighborhood and Sugden Regional Park that can serve as an example for additional connections Objective 1: Increase access to parks and public gathering places in the CRA area. • Strategy 1: Coordinate with Collier County Road Maintenance Division and Parks & Recreation Division to increase the number and quality of bicycle and pedestrian connections 1) between the Bayshore Dr area and neighboring County parks, including Bayview Park, East Naples Community Park, and Sugden Regional Park and 2) running north/south from neighboring County parks to increase accessibility to the Triangle area (see Section 5.3.S, Objective 1, Strategy 6). • Strategy 2: Coordinate with Collier County Road Maintenance Division and Parks & Recreation Division in conjunction with Thomasson Ave and Hamilton Ave MSTU improvements to evaluate opportunities for 1) maintaining car and boat parking at Bayview Park and 2) operational maintenance at Bayview Park. • Strategy 3: Coordinate with Collier County Public Services Department to evaluate opportunities for a park and/or public meeting space (e.g., library) in the CRA area. • Strategy 4: Create a site-specific park plan for the existing retention pond in the Triangle area. • Strategy 5: Evaluate opportunities for "pocket parks" (very small neighborhood park spaces). • Strategy 6: Coordinate with Collier County Parks & Recreation Division on any general parks improvements related to CRA development/ redevelopment sites and efforts, including the 17 - Acre Site (see Section 5.3.4). Objective 2: Support events in park spaces geared towards the CRA community. • Strategy 1: Coordinate with Collier County Parks & Recreation Division to promote park spaces as venues for CRA community events. 5-3-26 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 1 The potential park design concept shown in Figure 5-3-4 for the Triangle stormwater retention pond is based on previous planning and design efforts for the pond, with more consideration given to increasing visibility to enhance safety in the pond area (a concern mentioned during public outreach). The rendering includes a consideration for identifying sites for consolidated public parking, which may take the form of a garage. l48 1", PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 5.3 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 14B 1 53 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS () FXISTOG CONDITION'S ... * "' * * * ... P - arks Open Space The Redevelopment Area Plan update process identified parks and open spaces as important community assets, providing event spaces and opportunities to build a sense of place and community. Park access can be improved by providing better connections to parks and capitalizing on opportunities for new parks (such as at the Triangle retention pond and small pocket parks). Expansion of the CRA area to include the parks to the east should also be evaluated since L may facilitate making connections and other improvements. See Map 5-3-8 for existing parks and opportunities. Sugden Regional Park: County park that provides inland water access and water recreation programming. Image source: Collier County East Naples Community Park: County park that houses 38 pickleball courts for sports tourism and IocaFrecreational use.,. hosts the annual US Open Pickleball .-�___...L..,.. ..'�Llel:�ll to rn�mantc Im�oP cnYiYrP' fniiPY Bayview Park: County park that provides access to Haldeman Creek, ,ko —I .- In onrl the r,I IIf of MPxlrO. Naples Botanical Garden: a non-profit 170 -acre botanical garden with n„Ar wn nnn vidtnrc npr vpar_ Alyn includes meetina spaces. Haldeman Creek and Canals: provide access to the Bayshore Drive commercial area and the Gulf of Mexico. The Haldeman Creek MSTU funds periodic dredging and maintenance. Park Opportunity at Stormwater Pond: potential for design, traffic flow, safety, and flood management improvements. '% 5-3-28 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 148 1 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS Objective 3: Ensure a clean and well maintained public realm. • Strategy 1: Coordinate with the Collier County Sheriff's Office, Collier County Code Enforcement Division, service providers in the CRA area, and residents and business owners in the CRA area to develop a proactive community safety and clean-up strategy (inclusive of private property along the canal network) with an aim at reducing reliance on case-by-case enforcement. This effort should focus on residential properties and coordinate with the Community Standards Liaison pilot program of the Collier County Community & Human Services Division. • Strategy 2: Identify and document a strategy for canal maintenance in the right -of way, including seawalls and mangroves, in coordination with the Haldeman Creek MSTU Advisory Board. Table 5-3-1 indicates the amount of parks and open space that are in and bordering the CRA area. Total publicly -owned Retention pond site open space within CRA (northern Triangle area) area Additional open space or Botanical Garden green space in the CRA (non-profit owned) area 6.48 (includes pond) 168 174.48 6.27 120 173.27 347.75 i 4 8 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 5.3.4 Development Development and redevelopment can improve the quality and aesthetics of the built environment, as well as generate tax revenue and benefits to property owners through increased property values. This development and redevelopment activity also needs to include protections for existing community members who may face burdens from the increase in property values, such as increased costs for renters. This section provides an approach to foster and guide private development to enhance community character and provide increased stability and prosperity for community members. Also documented are more specific planning and visioning efforts for two key development opportunities, at the Mini Triangle and 17 -Acre sites. 6 .............. @ GOAL ............. Foster and guide private development to enhance community character and provide increased stability and prosperity for community members. Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS Objective 1: Improve the marketing, branding, and communication approach for the CRA area. • Strategy 1: Create a branding strategy for the CRA area to establish a community vision and character. This strategy should coordinate with the Arts and Culture Plan and the Market Study for the CRA (see Section 5.3.4, Objective 1, Strategy 5 and Section 5.3.4, Objective 3, Strategy 1). Strategy 2: Create a marketing and communication strategy for the CRA area to communicate vision and character with effective tools (e.g., website, social media, branding materials). This strategy should coordinate with the comprehensive design approach developed for the CRA area (see Section 5.3.2, Objective 3, Strategy 1), as well as improved communication efforts between the CRA and the community (see Section 5.3.7, Objective 1). Strategy 3: Provide CRA administrative materials (e.g., Advisory Board agendas, budgets, annual reports) in an accessible and easy -to -understand way. Strategy 4: Coordinate with the Collier County Tourist Development Council, Collier County Parks & Recreation Division, and other jurisdictions to promote the CRA area and its local business and commercial establishments as part of tourism development efforts in the area. This should include coordination with Collier County Parks & Recreation related to East Naples Community Park master planning and pickleball sports tourism. • Consider prior arts and culture planning efforts, such as those related to the Bayshore Cultural District (Resolution No 2008-60). • Incorporate an inventory of existing artistic and cultural features of the community to elevate. • Include a comprehensive public realm design approach for the CRA area and sub -areas (see Section 5.3.2, Objective 3, Strategy 1). • Consider housing needs and economic incentives related to arts and culture -oriented development (see Section 5.3.4, Objectives 3 and 5). • Include administrative needs of implementing the plan (e.g., an arts committee, additional staff). • Coordinate with countywide arts and culture strategic planning efforts. • Strategy 5: Create an Arts and Culture Plan for the CRA area to incorporate into the overall CRA area vision. This effort should: 5-3-32 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 Objective 2: Streamline and clarify the development process Strategy 1: Coordinate with Collier County Zoning Division to clarify LDC requirements related to development in the CRA area, particularly related to: • Relationship of overlay zoning to base zoning • Relationship of various applicable codes to each other (e.g., LDC, fire code, building code) • Allowable uses • Strategy 2: Coordinate with Collier County Zoning Division to evaluate approaches to streamline and shorten the development review process. Approaches might include: • Dedicating County staff to review projects within the CRA area and expedite them through the development process. • Improving coordination and communication between entities overseeing applicable codes (e.g., Zoning, Fire Marshall). • Identifying opportunities to increase reliance on defined criteria for development approval (as opposed to discretionary approval) • Encouraging design -build approaches. • Strategy 3: Establish a formal role for the CRA in the development review process to facilitate development of projects in the CRA area. US Open Pickleball Championships at East Naples Community Park. Source: Collier County Parks & Recreation Division, https.// www.facebook.com/Co/lierPorks/Photos/ x:852037184807466.1073741827.118036328207559/19606389606 13944/?type=3& theater Existing artistic features, such as murals, should be considered in the Arts and Culture Plan Clearer LDC guidance would help new uses such as microbreweries Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 /05-03-33 Objective 3: Incentivize desired types of development. • Strategy 1: Conduct a market study, including information on owners of second homes, which is not captured in typical data sets, to determine what development will be supported in the CRA area. • Strategy 2: Identify incentives and targeted assistance (see Development Assistance and Incentives Examples) for a range of development and redevelopment, including consideration of the following types of development and additional desirable development supported by the market study: • Local neighborhood commercial establishments • Social enterprises and business opportunities for those with tenuous livelihoods • Larger catalyst development projects • Arts -oriented development • Strategy 3: Evaluate and amend as needed current grant program offerings to reflect new incentives and assistance approaches from Section 5.3.4, Objective 3, Strategy 2. 1"81 Objective 4: Capitalize on current and potential real estate and development opportunities. • Strategy 1: Facilitate tenancy, development, and redevelopment, particularly for opportunities along US 41, Linwood Ave and neighboring non- residential areas, and Bayshore Dr, through incentives and communication efforts (see Development Assistance and Incentives Examples). • Strategy 2: Continue to facilitate existing catalyst project opportunities on the Mini Triangle and 17 - Acre sites (see Map 5-3-10) to strengthen and solidify development interest in the CRA area. Efforts might include assisting with coordination of property owners in target areas, negotiating desired amenities to be incorporated into proposed development, and providing incentives (see Development Assistance and Incentives Examples). • Strategy 3: Evaluate alternative funding opportunities, such as private funding and donations, for capital projects. • Strategy 4: Assess development opportunities for the Activity Center area, including the Courthouse Shadows site. • Strategy 5: Evaluate concepts to expand the CRA boundaries . Considerations might include the incorporation of new development opportunities, such as areas along Thomasson Drive, and the incorporation of County parks. 5-3-34 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 Fl 114 19 1 5.. PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEUTI" 0 ADDITIONAL INFOPMATION .......................... Development Assistance and Incentives Exam • Density/intensity increases • Impact fee offsets or payment over time • TIF rebates and TIF money for infrastructure • Land acquisition through CRA for targeted needs, such as parking and stormwater infrastructure, and to facilitate redevelopment • Tenant attraction and relocation support • Micro -enterprise incubator and technical assistance support in partnership with other local entities Potential Partnership Opportunities for Micro -Enterprise Incubator Incubators can provide workspace and assistance to micro -enterprises, particularly small businesses, looking to get their start in the CRA area. The CRA could potentially partner with existing efforts or collaborate on new efforts to support the work of incubators. For example, the Naples Accelerator (https://naplesaccelerator.com/) provides office space and amenities and connections to local economic resources to assist its member businesses. There may also be interest from other local entities, such as St. Matthew's House, in partnering to start a new incubator. Such partnerships can bring together organizations to pool capacity and funding to carry out incubator efforts and can also be used to support artists and arts -oriented development, a key aspect of the CRA's vision. Other Partnership Opportunities: Business Associations The CRA encourages businesses operating in the area to form associations and business districts to coordinate development efforts and potential funding tools such as MSTUs. Such associations can also serve as important partners to the CRA in its implementation of development assistance and incentives. Areas where these associations might be particularly beneficial are among the Bayshore Drive businesses, the Mini Triangle are property owners, and the property owners along Linwood Avenue and Kirkwood Avenue. Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 5-3-36 w it PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 0 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Development and Redevelopment Potentia Figure 5-3-5 provides a general indication of the development opportunities in the CRA area, showing vacant land acreage and the corresponding number of vacant parcels by land use type that could potentially be developed and indicating that most of the vacant acreage is residential. Map 5-3-9 indicates where these parcels are located. As the map indicates, the parcel sizes can run fairly small, so assembly may be a consideration for developers. The background analysis for the Redevelopment Area Plan also indicates a sizable number of parcels with structures, particularly single-family and mobile homes, that might benefit from upgrades to improve their structural condition. These efforts should take into account any potential increases in prices and costs when units are upgraded to avoid pricing out residents who find the new price and cost points unaffordable. 41 acres (62 parcels) 36 acres" NNNIMMUM (4 parcels) onNo an 0 acres 0 acres Residential Commercial Institutional Industrial Governmental Figure 5-3-5: Vacant Land Acreage Distribution by Land Use Type. *Note: A 32.5 -acre parcel northwest of the Boyshore/Thomasson intersection is coded as Vacant Institutional but is owned by MattomyNaples LLC. (Source: 2017 Florida Department of Revenue) Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 1 11 11cf&.11,114 14B PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS C1Sll11 l� IIl rn Ii1ITi ii:[ J ©y �E © v r Sugden ¢ Regional Map 5-3-9: Vacant Land Parcels in LRA Area. Note: Vacant institutional land northwest of Bayshore Dr/Thomasson Dr intersection is coded as Va- cant Institutional but it owned by Mattomy Naples LLC. (Source: 2017 Florida Department of Revenue) Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 c r 1 S a t cc a 90 �4 41 ET7 AVE 0L,_ C1Sll11 l� IIl rn Ii1ITi ii:[ J ©y �E © v r Sugden ¢ Regional Map 5-3-9: Vacant Land Parcels in LRA Area. Note: Vacant institutional land northwest of Bayshore Dr/Thomasson Dr intersection is coded as Va- cant Institutional but it owned by Mattomy Naples LLC. (Source: 2017 Florida Department of Revenue) Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 5.1 1 The CRA can facilitate development, redevelopment, and tenancy of vacant spaces through incentives and improvements to the surrounding areas. Map 5-3-10 and corresponding images show some of the key opportunities in the CRA area; note that the Mini Triangle site and the 17 -Acre Site contain parcels currently n\A/npH by the CRA Linwood Avenue commercial corridor redevelopment Courthouse Shadows redevelopment Gulfgate Plaza office tenant opportunity Del's 24 redevelopment opportunity Boyshore Drive commercial corridor redevelopment (including Haide man Creek Entertainment District near Creek) Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 14B PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS „j t 1. V; . Fall( i iONIASS 01 4 ----------- b 0 V C N Vacant Non -Residential Naples M EaSt Naples Commercial R= Botanical C nnirri 'ounit y�' Industrial Garden Palk"gill phi Institutional 68yvi6w Naples Botanical Garden ti PiirkCounty h E, 7�: State 1W, J At Naples 4- - ANDREWS AV Utility/Other 4 .. . . .. ..... CRA Boundary Park J6: 14, Wetlands z 7 �k J City of Naples z tIx, 61 4 Z.4-47 A �A, Map 5-3-10: Development & Real Estate Opportunities with Non -Residential Existing Land Use, Data source: 2017 Florida Department cfRevenue Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 F 5-3-39 5-3-40 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS Objective 5: Incorporate protections in de- velopment efforts to enhance existing community character and support existing CRA area residents. • Strategy 1: Establish assistance programs and incentives to protect and enhance existing com- munity -oriented uses and local neighborhood commercial and single-family neighborhoods off the main corridors. Assistance and incentive dis- tribution might account for building age, struc- tural quality, and means of property owners. • Strategy 2: In coordination with the Collier Coun- ty Affordable Housing Advisory Committee, pro- mote strategies to maintain current affordable housing availability in the CRA while improving baseline quality conditions. Strategies to consider include: • Community land trust • Coordinating with Collier County Com- munity & Human Services Division for mobile home upgrades and replace- ments with alternative unit types (see Housing Assistance and Incentives Exam- ples) • Residential renovation loan/grant pro- gram • Encouraging use of Collier County's im- pact fee deferral program for income - restricted units (see Housing Assistance and Incentives Examples) 146 0 ADDITIONAL INFOPMATION 0 � 0 0 0 0 * e a a 1 4 - Collier County Mobile Home Upgrade Program Collier County Community & Human Services Division currently oversees a program that uses State Housing Initiatives Partnership (SHIP) program funds to replace mobile homes with more sturdy single-family modular homes in response to hurricane damage. In Everglades City, these homes are elevated on stilts. The Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA may be able to refine this pro- gram to meet the needs of the community to encour- age replacement with a more suitable building type for the area. Residential Reno ati & the FEMA % Rule The FEMA 50% Rule requires that any existing building within an identified FEMA Flood Zone will have to be upgraded to meet current flood standards if improve- ments are made that are in excess of 50% of the struc- ture value. When determining structure value, only the value of the improvement itself (exclusive of land value) is considered. During the building permit review pro- cess, the County will require anyone located within a flood zone to go through a review process to ensure that proposed improvements are not worth in excess of 50% of the building value. The CRA may consider devel- oping partnerships/grants to assist in replacing struc- tures to encourage bringing existing buildings up to code and maintain affordability. Impact Fee Deferral For Income- Restricted Units Several cities and counties in Florida, including Collier County, offer impact fee incentives,for affordable and/ or workforce housing. In Collier County, for -purchase and rental units for households with incomes less than 120% of median income in the county qualify for impact fee deferrals. Deferrals are equivalent to up to 3% of the prior year's total impact fee collections, a cap insti- tuted to minimize revenue lost through the program. Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 R 14B PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS The County also limits to 225 the number of rental units receiving deferrals. Impact fees are deferred for owner - occupied units until the owner sells, refinances, or moves out of the home, at which time fees are due with interest. Rental unit fees are deferred for a 10 -year pe- riod. Historically, this level of deferral has allowed the program to defer impact fees on approximately 100 homes per year. A pilot program for payment of impact fees by installments collected through property tax bills (as an alternative to making the entire payment up- front) was also planned for the Immokalee CRA area. The Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA could support or replicate the County's program to defer fees in the Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA area; this approach could also be used to incentivize other types of desired development, as well. Case Information Source. Tindale Oliver (August 2017), Impact Fee Incen- tives for Affordable/Workforce Housing. Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 201900 5-3-41 5.3 �! pti PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS vl 5. 3.5 IIX 11) Having a variety of transportation options that are easy and desirable to use are important for all who live and work in the CRA area. Transportation systems not only cater to local needs between the CRA area and places such as Downtown Naples and local work- places, but also to more regional traffic moving iH through the CRA area on major roadways. In light of the various needs, this section aims to ensure safety, comfort, and convenience for various modes within and connecting with the CRA area. r 1 nsure safety, comfort, and convenience for various modes within and connecting with the CRA area. 0'001 5-3-42 �l Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 14B 1 Objective 1: Increase safety, comfort, and connectivity for active transportation modes (e.g., walking and biking). • Strategy 1: Create a strategy to implement discrete transportation improvements and more comprehensive Complete Streets corridor improvements. • Strategy 2: The effort undertaken for Strategy 1 should include development of a sidewalk master plan with inclusion of the following: • Visibility assessment related to landscaping • Consideration of connections to neighboring parks (see Section 5.3.3, Objective 1, Strategy 1 and Strategy 6 in this section) • Coordination with roadway and infrastructure improvements planned and/ or approved for implementation, including those that may stem from this Redevelopment Area Planning process or other agency planning and implementation efforts (e.g., County and CRA stormwater master planning). Strategy 3: Identify opportunities to coordinate transportation capital improvements with County/ MPO improvements along major arterials. Strategy 4: Pilot transportation improvements, such as elements of Complete Streets corridor improvements, elements of Bayshore Dr road diet (traffic lane consolidation), reduced turning radii at intersections to slow traffic, and additional pedestrian crossings, with temporary installations. These efforts should incorporate community input and feedback to gauge response to more urban - style development and any particular concerns to address or opportunities on which to capitalize. These installations can be incorporated into community events that include educational 148 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS elements on, for example, Complete Streets, the Vision Zero effort to eliminate bicycle and pedestrian fatalities, and roundabouts. Strategy S: Based on input from temporary installations from Strategy 4, move forward with vetting of Bayshore Dr road diet concept scenarios and traffic analysis. Strategy 6: Evaluate opportunities for a north/ south bicycle and pedestrian connector in the eastern Bayshore area with connections to Sugden Park and East Naples Community Park (see Section 5.3.3, Objective 1, Strategy 1). 1* * % % * * * * * * * * ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Int are Complete Streets? Streets that "serve the transportation needs of transportation system users of all ages and abilities, including pedestrians, bicyclists, transit riders, motorists, and freight handlers. A transportation system based on Complete Streets principles can help to promote safety, quality of life, and economic development." - FDOT, Completing Florida's Streets, http://www. f)completestreets. com/fi"leslFDOT- CompleteStreets-Brochure.pdf. Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 146 1 () 1XI" I GCS .....0 .0.0 ... 01*04e.a .O�004..uv�oellloo .4100 4�40......... a Existing Transportation Cond t o s Map 5-3-11 highlights existing transportation conditions identified by fieldwork. Roadways in the CRA area range from large arterials carrying regional traffic to small neighborhood streets, many of which dead-end throughout the CRA area. During fieldwork, cyclists were noted on the sidewalks of larger arterials such as Davis Boulevard and Airport Pulling Road, and many bikes were parked at Gulfgate Plaza off of US 41. The MPO and FDOT also identified Airport Pulling Road and US 41 as high bike/pedestrian crash corridors. Relative to other streets, Bayshore Drive has a number of improvements, including bike lanes, sidewalks, and transit shelters, yet it still experiences a lack of parking. There are limited pedestrian connections to parks from streets off Bayshore Drive; one connection is at Republic Drive. Note that these existing conditions are a general, preliminary assessment, with more detailed measures of existing conditions such as trip counts and traffic modeling anticipated as part of follow-up strategy– and project -specific evaluation prior to a decision to implement. Divided arterial with street fronting parking Cyclist on sidewalk of arterial Bayshore Drive with sidewalks and bike lanes Bus shelter at Bayshore Drive and Thomasson Drive Dead-end neighborhood street 5-3-44 \\ Pedestrian bridge to East Naples Community Park Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 14B 1 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 5,3 14B 1 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS Illu;STING CONDITIONS `4r_ Specific _... ",ion Needs & Considerations Fieldwork, discussions with CRA staff, public outreach, and specific project recommendations from the 2018 Blue Zones Project/Dan Burden East Naples Discovery Report informed location -specific, discrete transportation needs and considerations in the CRA area (Map 5-3-12). Many of these needs and considerations will be addressed through Complete Streets projects recommended in this Redevelopment Area Plan. Other transportation improvements such as addressing sidewalk and bike infrastructure gaps, providing parking infrastructure, and providing wayfinding signs will be addressed through separate project recommendations. Note that "Major Corridors" are designated based on highways, minor arterials, and major arterials in the area. "Needs Corridors" are designated where needs identified are generalized along the length of a roadway segment (related needs are those where labels intersect the corridor on Map 5-3-12). Curb extensions Wayfinding Lighting Road diet (lane reduction) 0 Traffic circulation along corridor, including " intersections Traffic calming Connect street 0 Commercial parking GI Parking including boat parking Major Corridor n a a a Needs Corridor 5-3-46 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 w �DAVIS BLVD = r�7 1 �f I� ti I �z lLIL1S�ll V I i f nm m s Cm Y Q� OM SSDN DR C� W a Naples �{ Q Botanical_ , Bavvi W i Park715 4 �l �}���9�� 10 r "" gM1b tll� i h "Al :: v ... _. ,, . 148 1 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 2 Map 5-3-12: Transportation Needs & Considerations rarK M.; < . u. st,Naples L al - munfty ' isw) Parkk r L1. elft' s�l.Ct I SSlRf. 1 `al{t i 1 Si Property Parcel DxgCRA Bounda*y Park sw, tr I Wetlands * City of Naples FT71e � . L Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 0 ADDITIONAL. INFORMATION 148 1 $ 0@ A 0 P 9 i T d@ d C P S@ F 0 0 A A� P" 0 A 0*! Q M R* 6* M R& A 4** 0® O k 8! 0 0 4 0 E M 8 Regional & County Transportation Projects The projects shown in Map 5-3-13 are those identified in the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization's Fiscal Year 2017/18 to 2021/22 Transportation Improvement Program (which also features the Collier County five-year program) and the trail recommendations from the Comprehensive Pathways Plan update process. These projects will thus be overseen by regional and county transportation agencies. The full set of recommendations from the Comprehensive Pathways Plan, once finalized, should also be considered in conjunction with transportation planning and improvements led by the CRA. FDOT TIP Projects a a P x • US 41 resurfacing • US 41 signal timing improvements • Davis Boulevard resurfacing County TIP Projects • Davis Boulevard/Airport Pulling Road intersection improvement MPO Pathways Plan Proposed Trail Improvements a ■ ■ n • Naples Bay Greenway (Sun Trail) Major Corridor Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 14B I PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 5.3 Complete Streets is an approach to comprehensive corridor improvements tailored to the size and land use context of the corridor. This approach can address many of the major needs and considerations identified in Map 5-3-13, including traffic calming, sidewalks, bike lanes, lighting, wayfinding, on -street parking, and landscaping. Complete streets improvements can also be coordinated with other infrastructure improvements, such as water main, fire suppression, and drainage upgrades. The CRA can take the lead on Complete Streets projects, focusing on the streets listed below categorized. Fieldwork, staff discussions, public outreach, and prior planning efforts informed which streets were targeted for these improvements. Map 5-3-14 shows recommended projects for neighborhood streets and busier corridors ("Major Complete Streets"). Suggested improvements for Major Complete Streets corridors may include changes to the roadway for vehicles (such as the addition of on -street parking). Neighborhood Complete Streets & Trails recommendations focus primarily on improvements for pedestrians, cyclists, and other active transportation (see the remainder of Section 5.3.5 for examples of suggested improvements). Connectivity in terms of destinations and network connections was a key consideration in selection and prioritization of these projects. Note that the length of the bicycle and pedestrian trail will depend on considerations such as available right-of-way; the Section 5.4 capital planning provides an estimate for a section between East Naples Community Park and Sugden Regional park. Also note that the Kirkwood Avenue "connection" between Pine Street and Shadowlawn and the Pine Street "connection" between Davis and Linwood refer to proposed roadway extensions that that do not have existing right-of-way. 0 Major Complete Streets N • • • • • Neighborhood Complete Streets & Trails f � � � m a • Linwood Avenue—Phase 1 • Bay Street • Shadowlawn Drive • Linwood—Phase II • Bayshore Drive (north of Thomasson Drive) • Thomasson Drive • Commercial Drive • Kirkwood Ave/Kirkwood Ave Connection to Shadowlawn Drive • Pine Street Connection Major Corridor • Danford Street • Hamilton Avenue • Jeepers Drive • Republic Drive • Bayshore Drive (south of Thomasson Drive) • Bicycle/Pedestrian Trail Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEIA B PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 14B 1 O 0 d* d! 0* to �, 4 0 P 4& P P 0 A P 9 0 Q 4 41. d 0 9 as &@ 0 F* 0# R* 0 A d k d 0 A k 8 6@#*.0. Character usages for Compiete Streets Improvements and Connections The following images illustrate Complete Streets elements from prior planning efforts for Bayshore Dr and Complete Streets improvements elsewhere. SAYS"ORE CORWE EA<T e ,T PiiLY LEtiE ,.WL 24' 2A' -p 4..,._ 11 11' L PROPOSED TYPICAL SECTION MC LANE ROAD WITH PARALLEL PARKdtiG, B Kc_ANES AND SIDEWALKS OF GH SPEEr, = 30 tAPi- Potential cross section for Bayshore Dr rood diet, as proposed in Trebilcock's 2017 Parking Needs Analysis. Existing cross section is four -lane road with bike lanes and sidewalks omplete Streets improvement Kamples (Left image source: /ikimedio Commons) These efforts and examples inspired the renderings of possible transformations for Linwood Ave, Bayshore Dr, and Jeepers Dr (shown in Figures 5-3-6 through 5-3-9) suggested as part of this Redevelopment Area Plan update effort. As corridors for potential commercial redevelopment, the Linwood Ave and Bayshore Dr renderings highlight an emphasis on ample sidewalk space along the landscaping and storefronts. Linwood Ave might promote a more modern design style for lighting and streetscape features as shown in Figure 5-3-6 and potentially further inspired by the modern style images on page 5-3- 22. Bayshore Dr might retain the existing style of streetscape elements in the lighting and signs. These renderings can provide a starting point for Complete Streets designs of other busier corridors (see "Major Complete Streets" on Map 5-3- 49), with the Linwood Ave design particularly suited as a basis for the suggested re -designs of Commercial Dr and Kirkwood As a less traveled residential street type, Jeepers Dr shows how people biking, walking, and playing can share the street space with cars accessing residences. Given that many streets dead-end and do not allow for through traffic, more simplified pedestrian infrastructure may be promoted over formal sidewalks. For example, the pedestrian space in the Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 PLANNING FRAMEWORK ELLAT ? rendering might be indicated with road paint. The swales have also been retained for water quality considerations, but incorporate vegetation to improve the visual appearance of swales. Porous pavement may also be an option for the areas where swales are represented, which might require different maintenance costs (an aspect that would be addressed with a more detailed follow-up design evaluation as noted below). Lighting in provided on one side given the limited road space, similar to improvements made on Lunar St in the CRA area. This type of design might serve as a starting point for the re- design of other neighborhood Complete Streets projects (see Map 5-3-49). Note that these proposed cross sections are only intended for general, initial illustrative purposes; final designs would need to account for a more detailed study and analysis of factors including engineering considerations, impacts, mitigation needs, and potentially the increase of alternative transportation methods (see Objective 2, Strategy 1 of this section for examples). For example, a follow-up analysis of a lane reduction proposal on Bayshore Drive would need to account for impacts to Level of Service standards on the roadway and on connecting roadways such as US 41, air quality, freight and evacuation routes, and a variety of other factors. It would also study whether additional easements would be needed or desired for a re -design. Piloting temporary versions of these improvements also provides a way to vet the design. This plan accounts for this follow-up analysis need and piloting with budgeted items for a Bayshore Drive technical feasibility study, a Complete Streets Implementation Plan that would provide a next -level feasibility analysis for these projects, and a Bayshore Drive pilot project with opportunities for additional pilots as part of the "other" non -capital projects budget item (see Section 5.4 for more information). SIDEWALK CG PARKING! SUPPER TRAVFt. LANE TRAVEL LAME PARKINCil SUfFER I CG SiDEWAIK r 2. s _ TWO LANE8ECTION WITH SVEWALKS ANO PARALLEL PARKING! SCALE 1/4' . 7" Li—od Avtrare Tindale� 'Oliver e �014M,y A1Mold �... �.« »...« m»...nm«ahe...s,=•. raw,. .maw �...�,. d 0, 1!; n Figure 5-3-6: Potentiol Cross Section of Linwood Ave Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 5-3-53 �., PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 148 1 iPtAM LANRRCAPE SR)EWAI.K PARKING WE T11 FA .ANE LANEISL:AYI MEUTAW 7kAV'1. '.f" GLKE PA.RKiNU 3 Stt�'r'A{K `ANLY.SGAPt L��xra. `+-0' d. PAg LANE tl' i0,,..,�__-..•-_•.^^�- it ( ANf� LANDSCAPE .1 5 C6 , S•CG •.� i.ANDSCAPE �•+ Y 8 O L ED(SEEe TION NTH MEDIAN, BIKE LANE, PARALLEL PARKING AND SEENALKSAND SCALE f!9" - S' "�. j 1 Vii(, (/�\J(� verWlTonla wmeuk .«*.•x .mw rz»vw».....x,me.aw .aM.vr .�.w. _ ion. d @ 5 19 n Figure 5-3-7: Potential Cross Section for Bayshore Dr y".... . . aatx ,.0 a °EMU, � \\` SIOSWALE TRAVEL LANE BIKEPED LANE m 2v �,.1y. E' _ BIOSWALE ONE LANE SCTION WITH BICYCLE. PEDESTRIAN LANE AND SIOSYYALEB' SCALE 114' - V C �.�P.. D-: Tindale SIV@Y C wrcaola Figure 5-3-8: Potential Goss Section forkepers Dr 5-3-54 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 14B PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS WOSWALF TRAVELLANE SKEMED BIOSWALE LANE I 14' ONE LANE PLAN WITH BICYCLE PEDESTRIAN CA,LANE AND BIOSWALES, SCALE V8'm f Jeepers Drive Tindale &.. 0' liver !RT_nly design Figure 5-3-9: Potential Aerial Rendering for Jeepers Dr Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 5-3-55 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS Objective 2: Increase and enhance alternative vehicle mode options within and connecting with the CRA area. ~Strategy 1:Evaluate opportunities for alternative transportation methods (e.0,golf carts, electric shuttles, other neighborhood/electric vehicles, shared and/or autonomous vehicles, bikeshane, water -borne transportation),including considerations for partnerships with neighboring communities. ^ Strategy 2:Coordinate with Collier County Public Transit & Neighborhood Enhancement Department for transit service and facilities improvements (e.0,more frequent service and transit stop she|ters). * Strategy 3: Evaluate option to expand Transportation Concurrency Exception Area ' (T[EA)toinclude entire CRA area. Objective 3: Improve parking options in co0N0NeKcU"'� �areas. ^ Strategy 1:Evaluate parking concepts for the BayshoreDrand Mini Triangle/Linwood Ave commercial areas, which may include: * Shared parking with shuttle service, particularly tomeet peak -season demand * Reduced design requirements for parking * On -street parking aspart ofthe 8ayshore Dr road diet ° Parking garages ° Parking mitigation fee (development pays for construction ofpublic parking inlieu ofproviding parking spaces) * Considerations for changes inalternative A, transportation methods such asthose noted in Objective 2, Strategy 1 of this �°� 5-3-56 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 141 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 0 ARTA. (NATIO Transportation n r° Exception Area (TCEA) Policy 5.4 of the Transportation Element in the Growth Management Plan created the South US 41 TCEA. This designation allows commercial and residential developments an exception to meeting transportation concurrency standards, which relate to the timing and programming of necessary transportation facilities to ensure they are generally provided in a timeframe comparable to the development. (see Policy 5.3 of the Capital Improvement Element for more details). The strategies developers can use to obtain the exception are intended to reduce trips or miles traveled in single -occupancy vehicles, such as incentives and amenities to promote transit, carpooling, telecommuting, walking, and biking. This Redevelopment Area Plan reinforces these strategies by promoting mixed -used and urban land use types that support alternative transportation (see Section 5.3.2). Objectives 1 and 2 of this section also promote improved facilities for walking, bilking, and transit use. A potential option to further align the redevelopment efforts of the CRA and the goals of the TCEA is to expand the TCEA to include all of the CRA area, expanding the exception applicability to further encourage alternative transportation. V� Pu ' ,CEA B.. -I_ �R mm+PexA.y TR -4 �`y`. ei 1 Transportation .4 South i 6J5 4. 1 / i�[� n.�? 1! " tiQ n AB PYmIe: C01Y9i a.7593(1pp%};SuR 018cBaa SL8303StOtl%) ARnN ups >r c«.`.xr xmawn¢ : i VaOW: C-. c 229 (10.4%): S— ofwsa =11$ 41 (10-0%) Concurrency Exception Area (TCEA) South US 41 TCEA (Source: Collier County Growth Management Plan, Transportation Element, Map TR -4) Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019°'' 5-3-57 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS Objective 4: Improve transportation connections with Downtown Naples. • Strategy 1: Coordinate with the City of Naples to explore and partner on transportation improvements and approaches serving both Downtown Naples and the CRA area noted in Objective 2, Strategy 1 of this section. 0 ADDITIONAL INFOPMATION Downtown Naples Mobility and Connectivity Study This study, completed in 2017, included a recommendation for an improved bicycle and pedestrian pathway on the Gordon River Bridge (5`h Avenue/US 41) that connects Downtown Naples and the Triangle area. The proposed design calls for narrower travel lanes and removal of the road shoulder to increase the bicycle and pedestrian pathway to 14 feet on either side of the bridge. If implemented, the responsibility for carrying out the project would be FDOT. 0 Proposed typical section for Gordon River Bridge bicycle and pedestrian improvement from 2017 Downtown Naples Mobility and Connectivity Study (Source: City of Naples, httos:llwww napiesgov com/sites/defaultlf /es/fileattachments/streets amp storm water/proiect/3351 city council presentation 201710 final revisions.0df) 5-3-58 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 5.3.6 Infrastructure Infrastructure can be key to facilitating development, providing the services communities need to function. Certain infrastructure, such as for stormwater management, is particularly important in the CRA area, which grapples with natural environmental factors including storms and flooding but also benefits from a healthy natural environment due to quality of life factors and tourism. As a result, the framework for this section aims to provide effective infrastructure that preserves environmental and neighborhood design quality through coordinated improvement planning and funding. a... .... .0 G 0 A L ............. Provide effective infrastructure that preserves environmental arra neighborhood design quality, through coordinated improvement planning and funding. 14B PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS Objective 1: Ensure that infrastructure provided will effectively achieve its primary purpose without significantly compromising environmental and neighborhood design quality. • Strategy 1: Develop a stormwater master plan for comprehensive infrastructure improvements that incorporates consideration for the following: • Flood plain designations, including FEMA flood designations and Coastal High Hazard requirements • Building and site plan design to respond to flooding • Primary, secondary, and tertiary infrastructure improvements (both short - and long-term) • Potential for a bicycle and pedestrian pathway in easement of north/south drainage ditch along Sugden Regional Park • Shared maintenance and maintenance funding between County and CRA • Water quality • Use/design of right-of-way areas on local streets, including an evaluation of turf block (see page 5-3-58) • Innovative techniques to pilot in CRA area, including green infrastructure Strategy 2: Coordinate stormwater infrastructure planning with design of new parks (see Section 5.3.3, Objective 1). Strategy 3: Integrate green infrastructure improvements into landscaping and drainage improvements, including those funded by the Bayshore Beautification MSTU. Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFOPMATION Green Infrastructure Examples Green infrastructure aims to reduce stormwater runoff and treat it closer to its source while providing environmental, social, and economic benefits. The following examples create surfaces or collection structures that allow stormwater to infiltrate the underlying or surrounding ground. They also can help manage stormwater flows and improve water quality of runoff and often can be combined with vegetation and landscaping. • Infiltration basin/retention pond – shallow basins or ponds that collect stormwater and can allow it to infiltrate the underlying ground • Permeable pavement – pavement that allows water to flow through and infiltrate the underlying ground • Rain garden – shallow planted basins that allow water to infiltrate the ground Bioswales –vegetated or soft -lined channels that collect and convey, slow, and clean water and let it infiltrate into the ground Vegetated planter boxes and bulb -outs– infiltration areas with raised edges that can be incorporated into roadway design features Kissimmee Lakefront Park rain gardens (Source: City of Kissimmee, https://www,kissimmee. org/Home/Components/News/ News/2208/263?back1ist=%2F) Vegetated infiltration area in roadway bulb -out in Palmetto, FL at 10`h Ave Wand 51h St W (Source: Google Maps, htt s www. aooale.com/maps/@27.5151522,- 82.575633 3a 60v,118.29h,75.57t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4! lsiahaGivzSzL DetQ43h5HQg!2e0!7il3312!8i66561 Retention pond amenities in Tampa at E Dr Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd and N 191h St (Source: Google Maps, https://www.google.com/""m---aos/@27.9815571, 82 4391844 3a 60v 90t/data=!3m6!lel!3m4!lsQJ3ui3LDTatc2Vr7pkffla!2e0i7i13312!8i6656) 5-3-60 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 Turf block, shown in the right-of-way area immediately bordering the street in the photo above, has been used in certain developments in the Bayshore neighborhood to allow for use of right-of-way space for park- ing. This option should be evaluated as part of the right-of-way design considerations in the stormwater master plan update. 14B A PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 5.3 Objective 2: Coordinate with other jurisdictions and government entities infrastructure planning and funding. • Strategy 1: Identify additional funding opportunities to supplement capital improvements funds (e.g., grants). • Strategy 2: Document the project prioritizi strategy to upgrade water lines and fire suppression systems in coordination with of Naples. • Strategy 3: As part of the stormwater mass (Objective 1, Strategy 1 of this section), coordinate with Collier County Stormwate Management to integrate CRA stormwate infrastructure planning with County storm planning efforts. • Strategy 4: As part of the stormwater mase effort (Objective 1, Strategy 1 of this sectio coordinate with Collier County Zoning Divi create right-of-way design guidelines for development that coordinate with ComplE Streets concepts for neighborhood streets • Strategy 5: Coordinate with Collier County agencies and utility providers to identify a improve other infrastructure including sar sewer lines, roadways that fail to meet mii standards, and electrical utilities identified placed underground or relocated. Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 5.; 148 1 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS Infrastructure—Stormwater, Roadway Engineering, Sanitary Sewer, Electric Stormwater and flooding are major challenges in the CRA area, requiring special attention be paid to stormwater management projects. The CRA has already overseen a successful drainage improvement project on Karen Drive, and moving forward, will coordinate with the County Stormwater Management Section. Map 5-3-15 shows where further stormwater management improvements are needed based on public outreach. Additional needs should be identified through an updated stormwater master plan for the area. Other identified infrastructure needs on the map include upgrading certain roads to meet County standards, upgrading capacity of sanitary sewer infrastructure in certain areas, and placing underground or relocating overhead electric utilities in certain areas. 0 Need for culverts for flooding, Retention pond area improvements needed—lighting, security, barriers/gates to direct car traffic, pump improvements for flooding issues 3 0 Flooding issues and need for drainage �f Flooding issues and need for drainage on side streets off of Bayshore Drive. Note that Pine Tree Drive, Andrews Avenue, and Woodside Avenue have been identified as below County standards (involving for example sufficient right-of-way, drainage, paving, or similar elements) in Resolution 2011-097. These streets should be a focus in stormwater and infrastructure planning to bring them up to standards. 0 Flooding issues and need for drainage on Holly Avenue. Holly Avenue also identified as below County standards and in need of road engineering improvements (see Item 4 above). Palmetto Court identified as below County standards and in need of road engineering improvements (see item 4 above). Upgrades needed to sanitary sewer capacity in the Triangle area to support new development. j Opportunities to place overhead electric utilities on Linwood Avenue and Commercial Drive a underground or relocate them. 1 tiPiu�� 5-3-62 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 14B I PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 5• PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 10 EXISTING CONDITIONS .......... Water Infrastructure The City of Naples provides water and water infrastructure for the CRA area, which also supports fire suppression systems such as fire hydrants. The fire suppression infrastructure can influence the insurance ratings for an area. On a scale of 1 to 10 (with 1 being the best), the CRA area currently has an Insurance Service Office (ISO) rating of 4. according to the Greater Naples Fire Rescue District. In practice, the District typically assigns ratings of 4, 9, or 10. The City is currently in the process of upgrading neighborhood water lines to support hydrants for fire suppression. Areas highlighted in red on Map 5-3-16 indicate water mains that do not meet the standard fire flow requirements determined by the City of Naples' potable water model. These mains have potential for replacement to upgrade for fire flow improvements. However, note that other sections of the water mains in the CRA area are older and will need to be replaced eventually. There is continued interest on the part of the CRA to identify and obtain grants to complete this work in partnership with the City of Naples. Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELE EN S Map 5-3-16: Water Infrastructure Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 ..7 Process The substance of the CRA's planning and implementation is important, as is the way it carries out this planning and implementation. In view of the diversity of communities living and working in the CRA area, this section lays out a framework to carry out CRA area planning and implementation efforts to engage and serve the various communities within the CRA area. ............. @ COAL Ca ,ul CRA area la�f�r ing and is nplementation efforts to engage and serve the various communities within the CFA area. 148 1 Objective 1: Improve approaches and tools for communicating with communities in the CRA area and the general public. • Strategy 1: As part of the marketing and communication strategy (see Section 5.3.4, Objective 1, Strategy 2), evaluate communication mechanisms and tools that will most effectively communicate with the various communities in the CRA area. • Strategy 2: Coordinate with schools and other community partners to improve outreach and communication between the CRA and harder -to - reach populations. • Strategy 3: Provide multi-lingual communications and materials. • Strategy 4: Create a CRA -specific Capital Improvement Plan to identify, prioritize, and effectively communication near-term capital improvements . Coordinate with MSTUs operating in the CRA area for relevant capital improvement projects. Objective 2: Ensure a targeted and balanced distribution of CRA planning and implementation efforts. • Strategy 1: Account for both need -based and geographic considerations in the distribution of planning and implementation efforts. • Strategy 2: Identify street blocks for targeted comprehensive improvements, with a focus on blocks that have already received some improvements and consideration for balanced distribution of these targeted blocks throughout the entire CRA area. 5-3-66 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 1 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEM • Strategy 3: Update rules and procedures for the CRA Advisory Board for legal consistency and with consideration given to a balanced distribution of planning/implementation efforts and diverse representation. Objective 3: Coordinate with MSTUs in the area and explore opportunities for new MSTUs. • Strategy 1: Incorporate Haldeman Creek and Bayshore Beautification MSTU Advisory Boards into planning and implementation processes for CRA improvements. • Strategy 2: Explore the option of creating an MSTU for capital improvements in the Triangle area north of US 41. Character In addition to a diversity of communities in the CRA area, there is also a diversity of built character. This section tailors the thematic goals, objectives, and strategies of the previous sections to specific character areas within the CRA area as a whole. The character areas numbered on the Map 5-3-17 are defined by the land use characteristics discussed in the preceding maps. Key focus nodes, intersections, and corridors within the character areas that have potential for redevelopment are noted on the map with the asterisks and dotted lines. For each Character Area, a brief description is provided as well as a focus for redevelopment efforts to prioritize framework elements for each area. Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 Mini Triangle/Davis • The Mini Triangle, including CRA -owned parcel, is a major commercial redevelopment opportunity and Focus Development Node • Corridor commercial along Davis • Linwood Avenue another potential area for redevelopment. Airport Pulling • Mix of corridor commercial, larger big -box style retail, and County Center • Part of area currently designated as an Activity Center in Future Land Use Map Windstar • Residential is primarily condos and single- family homes in gated communities • Includes golf course designated as a commercial use South Bayshore • Primarily single-family residential neighborhood with Naples Botanical Garden • Wetland considerations for development Idmikk Shadowlawn • Primarily a residential neighborhood with mix of apartments/duplexes and single-family homes around Shadowlawn Elementary • Borders US 41/Bayshore Drive Focus Intersection (asterisk), a gateway between north and south sections of CRA area OTamiami • Corridor commercial and residences, including two major malls, Gulfgate Plaza and Courthouse Shadows) • Borders US 41/Bayshore Drive Focus Intersection (asterisk), a gateway between north and south sections of CRA area 0 North Bayshore • Focus Corridor along Bayshore Drive with neighborhood commercial (including Haldeman Creek Entertainment District near Creek) • Mix of multi- and single-family residential • Focus Intersection at Bayshore/Thomasson with planned roundabout • CRA -owned Focus Development Node (17 - Acre Site) ■ ■ s ■ Focus Corridor :Focus Development Node/Intersection Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 14B PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS Maps -3-17: Character Areas Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 5-3-69 The following provides a focus of redevelopment for each Character Area based on the specific characteris- tics described for Map 5-3-17 and the most relevant strategies. 1. Mini Triangle/Davis • Urban -style mixed use commercial redevelop- ment, including capitalization on the Mini Triangle as a catalyst development site and urban -style parking solutions • Park development at retention pond site • Complete Streets design and commercial redevel- opment along Linwood Ave and other nearby commercial roadways; pedestrian scale street de- sign between Mini Triangle, Linwood Ave, and the proposed retention pond park • Improved access to Mini Triangle development from US 41, Davis Blvd, and Linwood Ave • Multi -modal connectivity: • Across Davis Blvd • Between Mini Triangle, Linwood Ave, pro- posed retention pond park, and eastern a Triangle neighborhood • To Downtown Naples potentially via Davis Blvd, US 41, and Gordon River Bridge im- provements Additional infrastructure improvements: sanitary sewers, electrical, stormwater 2. Shadowlawn 0 Residential structural enhancement and upgrades 146 • Infill development on vacant residential lots • Flooding and drainage on neighborhood streets Complete Street improvements along Shadow - lawn Drive 3. Airport Pulling Transitions between residential neighborhoods and commercial development • Eventual street enhancements, particularly con- nectivity across Airport Pulling Rd • Commercial fagade improvements 4. Tamiami • Connectivity to Downtown Naples via US 41 • Redevelopment of Courthouse Shadows • Tenant opportunity at Gulfgate Plaza 5. Windstar • Complete Streets and MSTU improvements along major community roadways, including Bayshore Drive, Thomasson Drive, and Hamilton Avenue • Access to Bayview Park 6. North Bayshore • Corridor commercial development along Bayshore Drive, including Haldeman Creek Entertainment District near Creek and creative parking solutions • Larger redevelopment opportunities of 17 -Acre Site and Del's 24 property • Arts and culture -oriented development Transitional elements between corridor commer- cial and residential areas in along Bayshore Drive and Thomasson Drive 0 148 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 5.3 Thomasson Drive, including Bayshore Drive/ Thomasson Drive roundabout • Neighborhood Complete Streets and trails • Connections between Sugden Regional Park and CRA area • Water main and fire suppression upgrades • Flooding and drainage on neighborhood streets 7. South Bayshore • Mobile home and single-family home residential improvements, upgrades, affordability • Development of vacant residential lots • Access to Bayview Park • Connections between CRA and uses to the east, including East Naples Community Park • Wetland, flooding, and site preparation considera- tions for development • Roadway improvements to meet County engineer- ing standards • Neighborhood Complete Streets Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 amu, 5-3-71 5.: PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS This page is intentionally left blank. 5-3-72 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 all, a 5-4-1 5.4.1 Prioritization of Pr(�Iects Initiatives The CRA will need to evaluate and implement or coordinate on a number of capital improvement projects and planning, administrative, and regulatory initiatives to carry out the framework of goals, objectives, and strategies presented in Section 5.3. Since these projects and initiatives cannot be evaluated and carried out all at once, this section presents a prioritization plan in terms of amount of funds programmed and project/initiative timing. A key consideration for prioritization is the amount of funding available for these projects and initiatives, discussed more in Section 5.4.2. Other prioritization criteria to consider that were primarily highlighted in the public outreach process include: • Funding availability from dedicated or outside sources (aside from CRA funds) • Magnitude of anticipated impact and multiplier effects • Whether planning has already been undertaken or completed Other considerations that received sizable positive responses during the public outreach process included: • Project timing considerations independent of prioritization (e.g., Haldeman Creek dredging should account for timeframe of sediment build- up, a stormwater master plan should be completed before stormwater improvement projects) • Ability to address health/safety concerns Additional considerations recommended by the project team based on the Redevelopment Area Plan update process include: • Degree of need • Geographic distribution of projects in the CRA area • Priorities identified during public outreach for the Redevelopment Area Plan 14B 5. 4.2 Financing An important revenue source over the next 11 years following plan approval is tax increment financing (TIF) revenue generated by the property within the CRA area. The Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA area is able to use county ad valorem tax revenues generated above the base -year amount (the increment) to apply to projects and initiatives identified in this Redevelopment Area Plan. Figure 5-4-1 shows the historic revenue trends and projected revenues through 2030 based on a low growth scenario that follows the County's historic growth trends with a 5.2% assumed average annual growth rate, a medium growth scenario that assumes a 5.6% average annual growth rate, and a high growth scenario that assumes a 6.0% average annual growth rate. For more information on the development of growth scenarios, methods of revenue calculation, and detailed revenue tables, see Section 5.6. Certain parts of the CRA area are also designated as Municipal Service Taxing Units (MSTUs), which utilize an additional ad valorem tax for specific purposes. The CRA can evaluate the opportunity to coordinate with the MSTUs to provide eligible projects proposed in this CRA plan. The Bayshore Beautification MSTU, created in 1997, applies to most of the CRA area south of US 41 (see Map 5-4-1); revenues from this tax are focused on streetscape and right-of-way improvements (including right-of-way maintenance), with some additional provisions for use of funds on other public realm improvements in the MSTU area. Figure 5-4-2 shows projected revenues through 2030 using the following average annual taxable value growth rate scenarios (see Section 5.6 for more information and detailed revenue tables): • Low: 3.98% • Medium: 4.18% • High: 4.52% A Haldeman Creek MSTU (see Map 5-4-2) was created in 2006 for maintenance dredging and navigational marker maintenance within the MSTU boundary. Figure 5-4-3 shows projected revenues through 2030 using the following average annual taxable value Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 1 14 PRIORITIZATION PLAt N TV 51 --,-----,-,DAVIS BLVD- 94 KIRKWOOD AVE LINWOOD AVE z 0 90 Ah "j)ft Y aaaea's""" % N a, p, 1 t: No p 0 Garden aai eW Pak 'R _' 1@1 ! M, C3 A BovrKltvy AM RAV i Sayshofe BeaulAkaton MSTU . .. ... ..... t"') flk V Ej Cily of Naples .. ....... . 77 "h Mmv A Map 5-4-1: Boyshore Beautification MSTU Area At Thomasson the CRA boundary that was approval during the development of this Redevelop- T Note: includes a boundary extension on east of pending men t Area Plan. "N\ Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 5-4-2 14B I 5•4: PRIORITIZATION PLAN $5,000,000 -$4,361,000 $4,500,000 „. t $4,000,000 ` $4,128,000 $3,927,000 � $3,500,000 $3,000,000 7 $2,500,000 _- $2,000,000` $1,500,000 $1,000,000 .. $500,000 $0 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017 2019 2021 2023 2025 2027 2029 —Low —Medium —High Figure 5-4-1: CRA TIF Revenue Scenarios Note: The TIF funding will sunset in 2030, so no TIF revenues are shown after 11 years. <; $3,000,000 $2,490,000 $2,500.000 $2,306,000 -$2,134,000 $2,000,000 $1,500,000 ,. .. $1,000.000 ,. $500,000 - So 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Fl —Low —Medium ----High Figure 5-4-2: Bayshore Beautification MSTU Revenue Scenarios Note: The MSTUs do not have a sunset date and will likely continue past 2030. However, for the purposes of this planning effort, no projections have been made for years after 2030. $250,000 ,000 2 $ 200,000 520,000 Sa�IA 'r"ra"°" $187,000 $100,000 S5o,o00 $o '`- 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 --Low --Medium n. Figure 5-4-3: Haldeman Creek MSTU Revenue Scenarios Note: The MSTUs do not have a sunset dote and will likely continue past 2030. However, for the purposes of this planning effort, no projections have been made for years after 2030. 5-4-3 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 x40 PRIORITIZATION PLAN i v t Map 5-4-2: Haldeman Creek MSTU Area Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 y,. 5-4-4 DAVIS BLV SA �. KIRKWOOD AVE c� l.INa^ OOD AVE 3 401 �E z BARRETT AVE n. C& Su den an „„)rrT..3� 041, KAREN t East Niplec .. Naples Bo 4 Ce CflfYtunit4 , .� Garden Park r ark sayview Pa rk 4 i v t Map 5-4-2: Haldeman Creek MSTU Area Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 y,. 5-4-4 growth rate scenarios (see Section 5.6 for more information and detailed revenue tables): • Low: 4.01% • Medium: 4.21% • High: 4.55% Note that the MSTUs do not have a sunset date and will likely continue past 2030. However, for the purposes of the capital and non -capital planning effort, no projections have been made for years after 2030. Other potential funding sources that may be identified to supplement the funds above include grants and funding from partnerships (other agencies and private funders). There may also be opportunities in the future to take on additional debt to pay for capital projects with a plan for repayment; note however that no debt will be taken on for the purposes of future property acquisition, based on direction from the Board of County Commissioners. More information on coordination and partnerships, including those for funding opportunities, is discussed in Section 5.4.4. Projects & 111ndiatives Prioritization Based on available funding and prioritization considerations, this section sets out a prioritization plan recommending projects for the period through 2030 (11 years after the adoption of the amended Plan), the period for which tax increment financing (TIF) funding will be available. The remaining project recommendations are included for longer term implementation post -2030 and will require alternative funding sources aside from TIF. The Plan provides an overview of potential alternative funding sources. This Plan does not obligate any funding to any projects listed. It provides a guide and list of both capital and non -capital projects that require approval by the CRA Advisory Board within the initial 11 -year programming period and allocation through the standard operating 148 and procurement guidelines adopted by the Collier County Board of Commissioners if TIF revenues are to be used for funding. Approval by relevant decision- making bodies is required for other funding sources outside of TIF. Projects may require additional vetting and piloting to better understand technical feasibility, impacts, and broader County implementation priorities prior to approval for implementation. To this end, planned projects include technical feasibility studies and pilot projects. As a result, this capital and non -capital funding plan is subject to change as it is re-evaluated. Additionally, the Plan sets a framework based on current conditions but also allows for flexibility in the phasing of projects based on funding opportunities and community priorities identified in annual work plans and capital improvement project lists. Table 5-4-1 summarizes total projected revenues for various funds operating in the CRA area (including MSTUs) through 2030. Note that following the successful sale of the Mini Triangle property anticipated in the first five years, it is expected that the CRA will have additional funds of $350,000 available that are currently being held in reserve due to loan requirements. Figures 5-4-4 and 5-4-5 summarize capital and non - capital project costs broken down by timeframe and type of project/initiative, followed by Tables 5-4-2 through 5-4-4 which provide a detailed list of projects and initiatives. Table 5-4-5 compares projected TIF revenues and costs. Note that the planning includes a built-in deficit to indicate where other agencies would likely help fund projects or other revenue sources might be sought, including once the TIF revenues cease in 2030. Regarding maintenance costs, maintenance of standard capital improvements is anticipated to be provided and funded by relevant County agencies, while maintenance for capital e , 5-4-5 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 i PRIORITIZATION PLAN improvements above and beyond County standards are housing for artists anticipated to be funded by the CRA. Bay St Complete Street Improvements – neighborhood -level Complete Streets Short Term (1-5 Years) improvements between Hamilton Ave and the end Capital Projects • Linwood Ave Complete Street Phase I – major Complete Street improvement between Commercial Dr and Wild Pines Ln including on - street parking, lighting, sidewalk widening, and any additional needed infrastructure improvements • Thomasson Dr and Hamilton Ave Improvements – Bayshore Beautification MSTU anticipated to fund project, but any shortfall could trigger partnership with CRA funding portion • Republic Dr Complete Streets Improvements – neighborhood -level Complete Streets improvements between Bayshore Dr and East Naples Community Park, including lighting, possible sidewalk expansion, any necessary drainage improvements, and an improved pedestrian bridge connection to East Naples Community Park • Danford St Complete Streets Improvements – neighborhood -level Complete Streets improvements between the end of the roadway and Hamilton Ave • General Parks Improvements in Bayshore Area— general item to address connections to parks and amenities, including any associated with the 17 - Acre Site and Sugden Regional Park • Community Safety/Clean-Up and Neighborhood Initiatives General Improvements—general item to address capital improvements from Community Safety & Clean -Up Strategy and Neighborhood Focus Initiatives; may include projects identified based on neighborhood interest to coordinate with the Sheriff's Department and Code Enforcement to of the roadway • Surface Parking Lot in Bayshore Area –to increase available commercial parking • General Road Engineering Improvements on Pine Tree Dr and Andrews Dr – to bring these roadways up to minimum County standards • Jeepers Dr Complete Street Improvements – neighborhood Complete Streets improvements between Bayshore Dr and Sugden Regional Park, including walk lane striping, upgraded bioswales, lighting, and a pedestrian connection to Sugden Regional Park • Gateway Intersection Design Improvements: • Davis Blvd/Airport-Pulling Rd • Davis Blvd/Shadowlawn Dr • Davis Blvd/US 41 • US 41/Shadowlawn Dr/Bayshore Dr – sign improvements in the right-of-way and median areas with an opportunity to showcase public art • Street Sign/Wayfinding Improvements in CRA area – signs to address branding and bicycle/pedestrian movement • Sidewalk/Bicycle Infrastructure Program – program to address gaps in the pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure networks that are not addressed through Complete Streets improvements • Other General Multi -Modal Improvements—for additional multi -modal amenities (e.g., bus shelters) • Stormwater Infrastructure Upgrades/ Improvements educate and provide small capital improvements • Sanitary Sewer Line Upgrades in Triangle Area –to • Land Acquisition for a Community Land Trust—may increase capacity support maintenance of current affordable housing • Water Line and Fire Suppression Upgrades—to availability in the CRA area while improving address infrastructure age and flow requirements baseline quality conditions; may also support Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 f 5-4-6 Non -Capital Expenditures Ongoing Operating Expenses for CRA, including staff and administration costs ' Process Improvements — updated bylaws for CRA Advisory Board Land Development Code Updates- based on • recommendations from CRA Plan Update Mini Triangle Development — funding for incentives and other needed support for the development of the Mini Triangle 17 -Are Development—funding for incentives and other needed support for the development of the 17 -Acre Site. ' Gateway Property Development —funding for potential incentive in support of the project at the apex of Davis Boulevard and Us 41. Stormwater Master Plan Update — identify primary, secondary, and tertiary improvements needed in the CRA area with a prioritization plan Arts and Culture Plan for CRA Area Complete Streets Implementation Plan Bayview Parking Study — concepts and outreach in coordination with Parks & Recreation Division Community Safety & Cleanup Strategy —strategy to address code enforcement issues and community safety Branding Strategy Marketing and Communication Strategy— strategies to communicate outcomes from the branding effort and connect with the various communities in the CRA area (including hard -to - reach groups) with updated tools including the website, e -blast templates, marketing materials, etc. Market Study/Economic Profile Bayshore Dr Pilot project — for Complete Street implementation Water & Fire Update Strategy — documentation of what mains and hydrants will be updated and phasing Triangle Retention Pond Feasibility Study—finalized design and engineering for passive park improvements Other Non -Capital Operations and Study Expenditures—may include a study to expand the CRA boundary, non -capital costs associated with Community Safety & Clean -Up Plan, non -capital costs from Neighborhood Focus Initiatives, or other expenditures that may arise in the future and are not yet identified. Grants and Programs • Residential Grant/Loan Programs—for structural improvements to single-family homes • Commercial Facade Program —for areas that are not a major focus for commercial redevelopment but that can be enhanced with exterior fa4ade and structural improvements • Wall & Fence Funding—for transitional structures between incompatible uses Public Art Funding —for public art pieces and events Economic Development Incentives Program —for economic development incentives related to Section 5.3.4 of the Redevelopment Area Plan Bayshore Bicycle/Pedestrian Feasibility Study Mobile Home Replacement Fund - for transition of mobile homes to modular homes or other appropriate structures Community Land Trust Housing Construction Other Affordable/Workforce Housing Investments Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 i Long -Term (After 11 Years) Capital Projects • Triangle Retention Pond Improvements - implementation of passive park improvements at the pond site with any necessary drainage and connectivity improvements • Land Acquisition and Development for Six Pocket Parks (small neighborhood parks) • Community Safety/Clean-Up and Neighborhood Initiatives General Improvements • Land Acquisition for a Community Land Trust • Surface Parking Lot in the Mini Triangle area to support commercial uses • Development of Multi -Purpose Facility/Structure— may occur on currently CRA -owned 17 -Acre Site; potential uses of the facility/structure may include a CRA office and/or arts/incubator space • Bicycle and Pedestrian Trail - along Sugden Regional Park Drainage Ditch to provide north/ south connectivity • Commercial Parking Garage on Bayshore Dr - possibly on surface lot included in short-term capital projects for commercial parking • Bayshore Dr Complete Street – major Complete Street improvement between US 41 and Thomasson Dr, including possible lane reduction, on -street parking, and any additional needed infrastructure improvements • Kirkwood Ave Complete Street—Complete Street improvement potentially similar to Linwood Ave Phase I with potential Shadowlawn Dr connection • Commercial Dr Complete Street—Complete Street improvement potentially similar to Linwood Ave Phase I • Linwood Ave Complete Street Phase II— neighborhood Complete Street improvements between Wild Pines Ln and Airport -Pulling Rd • Shadowlawn Dr Complete Street – major roadway Complete Street improvement between Davis Blvd 14 ■ and US 41, including lighting and any additional needed infrastructure improvements • Gateway Intersection Design Improvements – signage and potential public art opportunities for: • Thomasson Dr/Dominion Dr • US 41/Osceola Ave • General Road Engineering Improvements–to bring the following roads up to minimum County standards: • Woodside Ave • Holly Ave • Palmetto Ct • Sidewalk/Bicycle Infrastructure Program • Other General Multi -Modal Improvements • Water Line and Fire Suppression Upgrades—to address age and flow requirements • Stormwater Infrastructure Upgrades/ Improvements • Undergrounding Utilities—along Bayshore Dr between US 41 and Holly Ave, coordinated with the Complete Streets project and Bayshore Beautification MSTU; Linwood Ave; and Commercial Dr • Bayshore Dr Complete Street Improvement between Thomasson Dr and Holly Ave – neighborhood -level Complete Street, including any drainage improvements and connections to potential Naples Bay Greenway Sun Trail improvements • Commercial Parking Garage in Mini Triangle Area possibly on Surface Lot included in Mid -Term Capital Projects–to address commercial parking needs • Pine Street Connection—between Davis Blvd and Linwood Ave Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 5-4-8 11 14B 1 Non -Capital Expenditures • Land Development Code Updates • Bayshore Dr Technical Feasibility Study – for Complete Street implementation • Microenterprise and Arts Incubator Study—for concepts and implementation, which could include an arts focus and/or arts space • Other Non -Capital Operations and Study Expenditures—other expenditures that may arise in the future and are not yet identified • Grants and Programs • Residential Grant/Loan Programs–for structural improvements to single-family homes • Commercial Facade Program –for areas that are not a major focus for commercial redevelopment but that can be enhanced with exterior fagade and structural improvements • Wall & Fence Funding – for transitional structures between incompatible uses • Public Art Funding –for public art pieces and events • Economic Development Incentives Program –for economic development incentives related to Section 5.3.4 of the Redevelopment Area Plan • Mobile Home Replacement Fund - for transition of mobile homes to modular homes or other appropriate structures • Community Land Trust Housing Construction • Other Affordable/Workforce Housing Investments Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 PRIORITIZATIALP Tax Increment Financing (TIF) $33,790,000 $0 Bayshore Beautification MSTU $20,193,000 TBD Haldeman Creek MSTU $1,762,000 TBD Table 5-4-1: Summary of Projected Revenue Estimates Note: rounded to thousands 'The TIF funding will sunset in 2030, so no TIF revenues are shown after 11 years. The MSTUs do not have a sunset date and will likely continue past 2030. However, for the purposes of this planning effort, no projections have been made for years after 2030. Total Short -Term Costs (1-11 Years): $34.4 million Land Use & Urban Public Space, Parks, & Open Space, Desien. S16S.000. 0% $1,050,000,3% >pment, ,000,3% Land Use & Urban Design, Non -Capital, $37,500,0% $6,735,000 , 896 W_le ti_ •. Total Long -Term Costs (After 11 Years): $85.1 million Public Space, Parks, & Open Space, $3,144,404, 4% Development, 54.062.500. 5% Figure 5-4-4: Short-term costs by project type Figure 5-4-5: Long-term costs by project type Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 5-4-10 M i 5.4 14B PRIORITIZATION PLAN Table 5-4-2: Capital Improvements Project Matrix—North of US 41 (Triangle) --4-11 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 1 a x. Park Improvements Triangle Retention Pond Improvements $818,049 $818,049 Land Acquisition for Pocket Parks (2 parks) $937,500 $937,500 Development of Pocket Parks (2 parks) $163,178 $163,178 Public Space Improvements Community Safety/Clean-Up and Neighborhood $87,500 $25,000 $62,500 Initiatives General Improvements Sub -Total $2,006,227 $25,000 $1,981,227 Table 5-4-2: Capital Improvements Project Matrix—North of US 41 (Triangle) --4-11 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 1 14B PRIORITIZATION PLAN Complete Streets - Major Linwood Ave (Phase 1) $1,674,075 $1,674,075 Shadowlawn Dr - Installation of Streetlights $412,500 $412,500 Commercial Dr $1,903,219 $1,903,219 Kirkwood Ave/Kirkwood Ave Connection $2,177,813 $2,177,813 Pine Street Connection $2,210,891 $2,210,891 Complete Streets & Trails - Neighborhood Linwood Ave (Phase 11) $2,224,400 $2,224,400 Parking Surface Parking Lot - Land Acquisition $937,500 $937,500 Surface Parking Lot – Mini Triangle Area - excludes $439,113 $439,113 land acquisition cost Commercial Parking Garage (possibly on surface lot) $11,898,125 $11,898,125 –Triangle - excludes land acquisition cost General Multi -Modal Improvements General Sidewalk/Bicycle Infrastructure $2,775,449 $430,622 $2,344,827 Improvements Other General Multi -Modal Improvements $875,000 $250,000 $625,000 Sub -Total $27,528,083 $2,354,697 $25,173,386 Overall costs increased by 25% to account for annual increases Table 5-4-2 (continued): Capital Improvements Project Matrix—North of US 41 (Triangle) Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 5-4-12 ;.4 , 5. 14B PRIORITIZATION PLAN Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 1 Park Improvements Land Acquisition for Pocket Parks (2 parks) $937,500 $937,500 Development of Pocket Parks (2 parks) $163,178 $163,178 General Parks Development/Improvements $1,000,000 $1,000,000 Public Space Improvements Community Safety/Clean-Up and Neighborhood $87,500 $25,000 $62,500 Initiatives General Improvements Sub -Total $2,188,178 $1,025,000 $1,163,178 Land Acquisition for Community Land Trust $1,125,000 $500,000 $625,000 Development of Multi -Purpose Facility/Structure $2,812,500 $2,812,500 Sub -Total $3,937,500 $500,000 $3,437,500 Table 5-4-3: Capital Improvements South of US 41 (Bayshore) Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 1 14B I PRIORITIZATION PLAN plete Streets - Major t shore Dr Complete Street — between US 41 and $3,125,000 $3,125,000 Thomasson2 Thomason Dr and Hamilton Improvements $500,000 $500,000 Complete Streets & Trails - Neighborhood Bicycle and pedestrian trail along Sugden drainage $428,340 $428,340 ditch2 Jeepers Dr Complete Street Improvement S2 $491,849 $491,849 Republic Dr Complete Streets improvement S2 $506,849 $506,849 Danford St Complete Streets2 $689,329 $689,329 Bay St Complete Street ImprovementsZ $491,849 $491,849 Bayshore Dr Complete Street - Thomasson Dr/Holly $2,500,000 $2,500,000 Ave2 Parking Surface Parking Lot at Bayshore and Coco $351,290 $351,290 Commercial Parking Garage (possibly on surface lot) $9,893,500 $9,893,500 — Bayshore Dr General Road Engineering Standard Improvements General Road Engineering Improvements — Pine Tree $346,649 $346, 649 Dr' General Road Engineering Improvements - Andrews $346,649 $346,649 Dr' General Road Engineering Improvements - Woodside $433,312 $433,312 2 Ave General Road Engineering Improvements - Holly $433,312 $433,312 2 Ave General Road Engineering Improvements - Palmetto $213,371 $213,371 Ct2 General Multi-Modal Improvements General Sidewalk/Bicycle Infrastructure 2 $2,775,449 $430,622 $2,344,827 Improvements Other General Multi-Modal Improvements2 $875,000 $250,000 $625,000 Sub-Total $24,401,748 $4,405,088 $19,996,660 Table 5-4-3 (continued): Capital Improvements South of US 41 (Bayshore) Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 5-4-14 148 1 MIDETH"93aff ffalamb nm�a� Other Infrastructure Improvements Stormwater Infrastructure Upgrades/ImprovementS2 $5,250,000 $250,000 $5,000,000 Water Line and Fire Suppression Upgrades $7,221,510 $1,542,894 $5,678,617 Underground Utility Lines - Bayshore Dr 2 $2,775,000 $2,775,000 Sub -Total $15,246,510 $1,792,894 $13,453,617 Total South &, -"U $45,878,S i36 $7,790,481 $38,088,455 Overall' Capital Costs Total $90,824,795 $12,500,480 $78,324,316 Non -Capital Costs Total $28,616,116 $21,881,116 $6,735,000 Total Costs $119,440,911 $34,381,595 $85,059,3161 1 Overall costs increased by 25% to account for annual increases 2 Potentially IMSTU-eligible project; requires coordination and approval of Bayshore Beautification MSTU Advisory Board Table 5-4-3 (continued): Capital Improvements South of US 41 (Bayshore) 000 5-74-1 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 14B PRIORITIZATION PLAN OEM Operations and Studies Em Process Improvements - updated bylaws for CRA Advisory Board $25,000 $25,000 Staff and Operating (salaries, benefits, rent, etc.)' $16,626,116 $16,626,116 Land Development Code Updates- based on recommendations from CRA Plan Update $100,000 $75,000 $25,000 Mini Triangle Development Support $500,000 $500,000 17 -Acre Development Support $500,000 $500,000 Gateway Property Support $100,000 $100,000 Stormwater Master Plan Update $200,000 $200,000 Arts and Culture Plan for CRA $75,000 $75,000 Complete Streets Implementation Plan $50,000 $50,000 Bayview Parking Study -concepts and outreach in coordination with Parks & Recreation Division $25,000 $25,000 Community Safety & Cleanup Strategy to address code enforcement issues and community safety. $15,000 $15,000 Marketing, Branding and communication strategy - website update, a -blast templates, marketing materials, etc. $50,000 $50,000 Market Study/Economic Profile $50,000 $50,000 Bayshore Drive Technical Feasibility Study $40,000 $40,000 Bayshore Drive Pilot project $15,000 $15,000 Water & Fire Update Strategy - document what mains and hydrants will be updated and phasing $50,000 $50,000 Triangle Retention Pond Feasibility Study $25,000 $25,000 Microenterprise and arts incubator Study for concepts and implementation $20,000 $20,000 Other non -capital operations and study expenditures $500,000 $250,000 $250,000 Grants and Programs smffn����� El Residential Grant/Loan Programs -for structural improvements to single- $375,000 $125,000 $250,000 family homes Commercial Facade Program $750,000 $250,000 $500,000 Wall & Fence Funding - for funding transitional structures between incompatible uses $375,000 $125,000 $250,000 Public Art -funding for public art pieces and events $225,000 $75,000 $150,000 Economic Development -funding for economic development incentives listed In Development Section $375,000 $125,000 $250,000 Mobile Home Replacement Fund $1,500,000 $500,000 $1,000,000 Community Land Trust Housing Construction $4,800,000 $1,800,000 $3,000,000 Other Affordable/Workforce Housing Investments $1,250,000 $250,000 $1,000,000 Totals 1 $28,616,116 $21,881,116 $6,735,000 ' Assumes a 25% cost increase to account inflation and other potential cost increases ' Assumes no staff and operating costs after the end of the TIF collection period in 2030 Table 5-4-4: Non Capital Expenditures Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan -May 2019 5-4-16 146 1 Table 5-4-5: Summary of CRA Project Costs and Projected TIF Revenues Notes: revenues rounded to thousands 'Overall costs increased by 25% to account for annual increases. The TIF funding will sunset in 2030, so no TIF revenues are shown after 11 years. 5.4.4 oordination Many of the items listed in the Section 5.3 framework and capital and non -capital projects listed in this section require the CRA to seek approval from and coordinate with other agencies and entities, which may include planning and process approval and/or coordination and identifying opportunities for shared funding. Coordination also includes instances in which another agency or entity oversees a project or initiative directly with the CRA assisting. As mentioned in Section 5.4.3, the framework and projects identified in this plan are suggestions to be further vetted prior to approval for implementation. This includes review and approval from relevant County staff and elected officials. Planning and implementation may also include broader coordination with agencies. Examples include coordination with the Collier MPO to share local needs that might inform a state roadway improvement, as well as coordinating with other Collier County agencies on topics such as Land Development Code changes, park access, community safety, transit and transportation, and stormwater. The CRA also has opportunities to coordinate with the City of Naples on transportation planning and water main upgrades. This type of coordination might involve design review for projects led by the CRA and setting up meetings coinciding with regular planning and project cycles prior to finalized design phases. Key planning cycles for coordination include the Transportation Improvement Program planning by the MPO and capital improvement planning for Collier County. When working with agencies to identify shared funding opportunities as a part of these planning and implementation processes, it is important to recognize existing funding commitments, as well as limitations on the use of funds. For example, road impact fees in Collier County must be used for capacity expansion, such as adding a new road or new lanes to an existing road. Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 Total Capital Costs - North of US 41 (Triangle) $44,945,859 $4,709,998 $40,235,861 Total Capital Costs - South of US 41(Bayshore) $45,878,936 $7,790,481 $38,088,455 Total Capital Costs $90,824,795 $12,500,480 $78,324,316 Total Non -Capital Costs $28,616,116 $21,881,116 $6,735,000 Total TIF Revenue $33,790,000 $33,790,000 $0 Difference -$85,650,911 -$591,595 -$85,059,316 Table 5-4-5: Summary of CRA Project Costs and Projected TIF Revenues Notes: revenues rounded to thousands 'Overall costs increased by 25% to account for annual increases. The TIF funding will sunset in 2030, so no TIF revenues are shown after 11 years. 5.4.4 oordination Many of the items listed in the Section 5.3 framework and capital and non -capital projects listed in this section require the CRA to seek approval from and coordinate with other agencies and entities, which may include planning and process approval and/or coordination and identifying opportunities for shared funding. Coordination also includes instances in which another agency or entity oversees a project or initiative directly with the CRA assisting. As mentioned in Section 5.4.3, the framework and projects identified in this plan are suggestions to be further vetted prior to approval for implementation. This includes review and approval from relevant County staff and elected officials. Planning and implementation may also include broader coordination with agencies. Examples include coordination with the Collier MPO to share local needs that might inform a state roadway improvement, as well as coordinating with other Collier County agencies on topics such as Land Development Code changes, park access, community safety, transit and transportation, and stormwater. The CRA also has opportunities to coordinate with the City of Naples on transportation planning and water main upgrades. This type of coordination might involve design review for projects led by the CRA and setting up meetings coinciding with regular planning and project cycles prior to finalized design phases. Key planning cycles for coordination include the Transportation Improvement Program planning by the MPO and capital improvement planning for Collier County. When working with agencies to identify shared funding opportunities as a part of these planning and implementation processes, it is important to recognize existing funding commitments, as well as limitations on the use of funds. For example, road impact fees in Collier County must be used for capacity expansion, such as adding a new road or new lanes to an existing road. Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 14B PRIORITIZATION PLAN Aside from government agencies, the CRA may also have opportunities to partner with local entities such as private firms and non -profits to realize some of its strategies and projects, as well as seek private sponsorships Examples include potentially partnering with the Naples Accelerator, St. Matthew's House, and/or the United Arts Council on a business/art incubator idea. There may also be opportunities to partner with companies such as Slidr for alternative vehicle transportation in the area. Coordination and funding opportunities may also be identified as part of private development projects. Lastly, as mentioned at the beginning of this section, the CRA should look for opportunities to coordinate with the MSTUs operating in the area to implement capital improvements. Table 5-4-6 shows the costs for projects in the CRA prioritization plan that may qualify for Bayshore Beautification MSTU funds and compares them to the projected revenues for the MSTU through 2030; note that revenues beyond this timeframe are considered "to be determined" depending on when the projects are implemented. The comparison shows that the money available would cover these project costs with a sizable amount of funds remaining for other MSTU projects. Note that the MSTU Advisory Board would need to approve any process or funding coordination. Table 5-4-6: Summary of MSTU-Eligible Costs and Projected MSTU Revenues Note: Projects are considered MSTU-eligible based on those that align with accepted uses of Bayshore Beautification MSTU funds ac- cording to Ordinance No. 2013-68; revenues rounded to thousands 'Overall costs increased by 256 to account for annual increases 2The MSTUs do not have a sunset date and will likely continue past 2030. However, for the purposes of this planning effort, no projec- tions have been made for years after 2030. Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 5-4-18 El This page is intentionally left blank. Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 148 1 Overview f Relevant Community redevelopment areas are created on the basis of a finding of blight or slum conditions, as noted in Section 163.355 of Florida Statute. Table 5-2-1 provided detailed blight conditions for the Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA area, summarizing information from the 2000 Plan. Table 5-5-1 shows how the framework in this Redevelopment Area Plan addresses the main blight factors identified. Related capital and non -capital projects can also be found in Section 5.4. In addition, sections 163.360 and 163.362 of Florida Statutes contain specific requirements for community redevelopment plans. Tables 5-5-2 and 5-5-3 provide an overview of the requirements from these statutes and the location in this Redevelopment Area Plan where the relevant information can be found to satisfy these requirements. ..2 Consistent with the Comprehensive This Redevelopment Area Plan sets forth a vision for the CRA area centered on fostering more urban -style development, including multi -modal corridors, mixed use projects, and building out to allowable densities. The Collier County Growth Management Plan largely supports this vision with the Bayshore Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Overlay provisions and the Activity Center designation. The Mixed Use overlays provided in the Land Development Code further support these efforts. Development and redevelopment are thus largely intended to be completed within the provisions of the Growth Management Plan as they exist now or indicate where future amendments may be needed in order to carry out implementation of action items. c 3.3 Acquisition, Demolition. Clearance, & Improvement In the future, the Redevelopment Agency may choose to pursue a program of property acquisition and/or consolidation to realize the redevelopment objectives. These objectives might relate to facilitating private development and providing identified needed public uses. If a property is designated for acquisition, the process must comply with County requirements and/ or State statutes. The Redevelopment Agency is authorized to demolish, clear, or move buildings, structures, and other improvements from any real property acquired in the redevelopment project area, subject to obtaining necessary permits. The CRA may also engage in or assist in site preparation improvements on properties it already owns or properties it acquires in the future to facilitate development. Other improvements include general infrastructure and streetscape improvements that indirectly support development. See Section 5.4.3 for those improvements that are planned for the CRA to fund. All of these improvements are subject to obtaining necessary permits. Section 1.5 further outlines the Agency's authorities that governs this area. 5. 5.4 Zen I ing & Comprehensive Plan Changes No Growth Management Plan or Land Development Code changes were brought through an approval process as part of this planning effort, and no Land Development Code or Comprehensive Plan changes are being adopted with the adoption of this Redevelopment Area Plan. However, recommended changes will be brought for initial consistency review by Collier County staff and the Collier County Planning Commission following adoption of this plan. :5.5.5 LandUse,Densities, K Building Requirements As noted in Section 5.5.4, no Land Development Code or Comprehensive Plan changes are being adopted with the adoption of this Redevelopment Area Plan. Consequently, the Redevelopment Area Plan will follow the land uses, densities, and building requirements provided in the Growth Management Plan and the Land Development Code for the time being. However, recommended changes will be brought forth for initial consistency review by Collier 5-5-1 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 Predominance of defective or inadequate Faulty lot layout in relation to size, adequacy, accessibility, Unsanitary or unsafe Deterioration of site or other improvements (drainage and surface water management) 14 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS Section 5.3.5 addresses street design primarily with Complete Streets initiatives; there are additional improvements for addressing bicycle and pedestrian gaps, commercial parking need, and additional bicycle and pedestrian connections. Section 5.3.4 focuses on specifically on facilitating private development. As part of these efforts, the CRA can acquire property to merge lots and make them more easily developed. Additionally, Section 5.3.2 lays out examples of multi -family residential that provide examples to achieve higher residential densities where approved densities are not realized. Sections 5.3.3 and 5.3.4 contain strategies to address structural upgrades and public realm clean-up and improvements. Sections 5.3.2 and 5.3.4 also address residential types and approaches to affordability that can address overcrowding. Section 5.3.5 highlights lighting and other transportation safety improvements, particularly for cyclists and pedestrians. Section 5.3.6 focuses on infrastructure improvements, including those for Other problems: Lack of right-of-way for Section 5.3.5 includes improvements for Shadowlawn Drive. Shadowlawn Drive Other problems: Lack of Section 5.3.5 includes a coordination strategy for public transit in the CRA area. public transportation Other problems: housing Section 5.3.4 includes example strategies to address housing affordability issues. Table 5-5-1: Sections of Redevelopment Area Plan that address blight conditions Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 5-5-2 5.5 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 14B Conformity to the Growth Management Plan Section 5.5.2 Zoning and planning changes Section 5.5.4 Section 5.3.1, Maps 5-3-5 and 5- 3-6, Section 5.5.5; for general Land uses, maximum densities, and building requirements considerations to guide these requirements, see Section 5.3.2 Land acquisition, demolition, clearance and site preparation, redevelopment, improvements, and rehabilitation proposed to carry out Sections 5.4.3 and 5.5.3 the Redevelopment Area Plan Affordable housing provision Section 5.3.4- Objective 5 Table 5-5-2: Section 163.360, F.S. Requirements for Redevelopment Area Plan 5-5-3 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 �1 GENERAL Resolution 2000-82, Exhibit A at Legal description of CRA area boundaries and reason behind establishing end of this document and such boundaries Resolution 2000-83_ Approximate amount of open space to be provided shown by diagram and Section 5.3.3 -Table 5-3-1 and in general terms Map S-3-8 Property intended for parks and recreation space shown by diagram and in Section 5.3.3 -Map 5-3-8 general terms Street layout and property intended for streets shown by diagram and in Section S.3.5 -Map 5-3-14 general terms Section 5.3.1, Maps 5-3-5 and 5 - Limitations on the type, size, height, number, and proposed use of 3-6, Section 5.5.5; for general buildings shown by diagram and in general terms considerations to guide these requirements, see Section 5.3.2 The approximate number of dwelling units shown by diagram and in Section 5.3.2 -Map 5-3-2 general terms Replacement housing and relocation Section 5.3.4, Section 6 Property intended for public utilities shown by diagram and in general Section 5.3.6 -Maps 5-3-15 and 5 terms -3-16 Section 5.3.1 -Map 5-3-1, Section 5.4.2; additional details Property for public improvements of any nature shown by diagram and in in Section 5.3.2 -Map 5-3-7, Section 5.3.3 -Map 5-3-8, Section general terms 5.3.4 -Map 5-3-10, Section 5.3.5 - Maps 5-3-12 and 5-3-14, Section 5.3.6 -Maps 5-3-15 and 5-3-16 Neighborhood impact element describing impacts on residents of CRA area and surrounding areas in terms of relocation, traffic circulation, environmental quality, availability of community facilities and services, Section 5.5.6 effect on school population, and other matters affecting the physical and social quality of the neighborhood Publicly funded capital improvements to be undertaken in the CRA area Section 5.4.2 Safeguards, controls, restrictions/covenants Section 5.5.7 µ. Replacement housing for relocation of displaced persons from housing Section 6 facilities Section 5.3.2, Section 5.3.4 - Residential use element Objective 5i Projected costs of redevelopment Section 5.4.3 Redevelopment Area Plan duration and time certain for redevelopment Section 1.6 financed by increment revenues o� Table 5-5-3: Section 163.362, F.S. Requirements for Redevelopment Area Plan Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 5-5-4 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS County staff and the Collier County Planning Commission. 5.5.6 Neighborhood Impact The Redevelopment Area Plan focuses on improving structural quality of buildings, compatibility of uses, and urban design, as well as promoting more urban - style development and multi -modal transportation. As of right now, there is housing available at lower income levels, yet this may be due to lower structural quality based on findings from the background analysis for the Redevelopment Area Plan. As improvements are made in the area, there is a potential risk of property values rising to make housing substantially less affordable. Consequently, protective measures are being considered to maintain the affordability of these units while improving their quality (see Section 5.3.4, Objective S). Temporary relocation of residents in lower quality units may be required to make building improvements. An additional consideration for lower income households with improvements to the CRA area is the availability of community facilities and services. These uses may also risk displacement if property values increase rapidly or dramatically. This Redevelopment Area Plan includes provisions to support community - oriented uses that include these facilities and services so that they can remain a part of the community (see Section 5.3.4, Objective 3, Strategy 2). With more urban -style development and multi -modal improvements, traffic circulation may change. There may be increased congestion on roadways and at major state road intersections in making them safer for non - automobile modes and pursuing catalyst development opportunities. Any development would need to go through the existing Collier County process to assess and mitigate for Level of Service changes on roadways. Ensuring low-cost transportation alternatives may also support affordable mobility for lower income households and community members. Regarding impacts on other facilities, such as schools, any new development would need to go through the existing Collier County process to assess and mitigate for Level of Service changes. Regarding environmental quality, water quality is a key consideration for stormwater management improvements. Water quality impacts can be evaluated through existing Collier County processes. Additionally, this Redevelopment Area Plan encourages green infrastructure techniques that may help provide certain levels of localized water treatment and ground infiltration prior to arriving at major collector sites. 5.5.7 Safeguards,nl Restrictions, & Assurances Redevelopment activities identified in this Redevelopment Area Plan will not be initiated until they are found to be consistent with the Collier County Growth Management Plan and applicable land development regulations. The Community Redevelopment Agency, working collaboratively with County agencies, may propose amendments to the Growth Management Plan and the Land Use Development Code, including design criteria, building heights, land coverage, setback requirements, special exceptions, traffic circulation, traffic access, and other development and design controls necessary for proper development of public and private projects. To leverage the increment revenues, Collier County may consider non -ad valorem assessments. For example, during the Redevelopment Area Plan update process, the County was working on a stormwater utility fee that, if adopted, would apply to the CRA area. The imposition of special assessments for capital improvements and essential services is covered by well settled case law and specific statutory provisions authorizing collection of non -ad valorem assessments on the same bill as ad valorem taxes. Such provisions require extraordinary notice to all affected property owners. Issues concerning restrictions on any property acquired for community redevelopment purposes and then returned to use by the private sector will be addressed 5-5-5 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS on a case-by-case basis to ensure all activities necessary to perpetuate the redevelopment initiative are advanced in a manner consistent with this Redevelopment Area Plan and any amendment to it. Such restrictions or controls would be expected in the form of covenants on any land sold or leased for private use as provided for in the Community Redevelopment Act, Section 163.380, F.S. To assure that redevelopment will take place in conformance with the projects, objectives and strategies expressed in this Redevelopment Area Plan, the Redevelopment Agency will utilize the regulatory mechanisms used by the County to permit development and redevelopment within its jurisdiction. These mechanisms include but are not limited to the Growth Management Plan; the Land Development Code; adopted design guidelines; performance standards; and County -authorized development review, permitting, and approval processes and any other adopted codes, standards, and policies. Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 I 5-5-7 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS This page is intentionally left blank. Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 TAX INCREMENT & MSTU ESTIMATES 5.6.1 Tax IncrementFinancing The Redevelopment Area is dependent upon the use of increment revenue financing for funding. Using this method, the County froze all taxable values within the Redevelopment Area at the 2000 rate to establish a base collection amount. Millages are applied through the General Fund (001) and the Unincorporated Area General Fund (111). The future taxes collected (associated with tax base and property value increases) are placed into a separate account and designated for specific uses. The funds can be dedicated to transportation or general improvements, or placed in the general fund with the base ad valorem revenues. The analysis is based on the historical tax roll data obtained from the Florida Department of Revenue (FDOR) and population projections for Collier County obtained from the Bureau of Economic and Business Research (BEBR). Specific increases in the tax base are shown in terms of expected development and its value. This expected development is based exclusively on past patterns of activity adjusted for anticipated community redevelopment activities within the Redevelopment Area. These programmatic assumptions offer a baseline for comparison with future potential development. For this analysis, the Bayshore CRA's current millage rates have been used, and were held constant over the planning horizon. As for the structure of the revenues which may accrue, only the taxable value(s) net of the base year taxable value is considered in calculating current or future increment revenues. The general procedures used to calculate available revenues are shown in the following calculations: Assessed values, including new construction — Exemptions or exclusions = Current taxable values Current taxable values — Established base year taxable values = Net valuations subject to applicable jurisdictional millages. Net valuations x by applicable millages = increment revenues. Pursuant to the Community Redevelopment Act, Section 163.387, F.S., the 14B maximum revenue available to the Redevelopment Trust Fund will be 95 percent of the calculated increment revenues. Note that the first five years of projected values are obtained from Florida's Office of Economic & Demographic Research (EDR) Revenue Estimating Conference. The conference produces detailed projections of the "County Taxable Value" for each county in Florida. The values projected by EDR were used for each CRA tax increment scenario with the low, medium, high growth scenarios starting in 2025. For projection purposes past 2025, three different scenarios were developed that reflect different future growth rates for taxable values in the Redevelopment Area. Additional details for each scenario are presented below and in Tables 5-6-1 through 5-6-3. Scenario #1 Ad valorem revenues associated with the increment revenue financing for the Redevelopment Area were estimated using the projected growth of the taxable values for residential and non-residential developments. The average taxable values were indexed annually based on the positive correlation between population growth and taxable value increases discussed previously, along with the historical growth trends of taxable values in the Redevelopment Area, by land use. Based on these projections, if the current millage is held constant (3.5645 mils for fund 001 and 0.8069 mils for fund 111), the ad valorem taxes used for the Redevelopment Area fund are estimated to generate approximately $33.8 million between through 2030. Additional growth scenarios are presented in this report that reflects more aggressive growth rates in taxable values and potential revenues. Although more aggressive than the growth rates in Scenario #1, these scenarios still present revenue projections that can reasonably be obtained. Since 1976, the taxable value for residential property in Collier County has averaged a 10 percent annual increase, and commercial property has averaged a 9 percent annual increase. Within the CRA, taxable values (all property) have averaged a 5 percent annual increase. 5-6-1 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 0, Scenario #2 Scenario #2 reflects increased growth rates that are consistent with the historical growth rates in taxable values for the entire CRA area. This scenario estimates slightly higher taxable value growth than Scenario #1, with a projected average annual taxable value growth rate of 5.6 percent (as opposed to Scenario #1 at 5.2 percent). As CRA properties are redeveloped, it is reasonable to assume that taxable values will increase at or above historical growth rates. Using these higher annual growth rates, the Scenario #2 increment revenue financing option would generate approximately $34.3 million through 2030. Scenario #3 Additionally, an optimistic growth rate scenario was developed. Scenario #3 has increased growth rates that are more than Scenarios #1 and #2, bringing the average growth rate for all land uses more in line with the recent growth rates of the entire county seen over the last few years. This scenario projects the growth in taxable values for all property to average approximately 6.0 percent, annually. Using these rates, the increment revenue financing option generated approximately $35.1 million through 2030. For each of the following scenarios, the following apply: • Projected total taxable value of all properties within Redevelopment Area. Projected growth rates by land use are consistent with historical growth rates observed between 2000 and 2018 within Redevelopment Area. All figures rounded to nearest thousand. • Difference between total taxable value (Item 1) for each year and base year (2000). • For projection purposes, millage rates are assumed to remain the same through 2030. • Increment revenue by year (Item 2), divided by 1,000, multiplied by total millage rate, and reduced by 5 percent for budgeting purposes. 14B TAX INCREMENT & MSTU ESTIMATES Municipal Units (MSTUs) There are two MSTUs that overlap with the CRA area — the Bayshore Beautification MSTU and the Haldeman Creek MSTU. The Bayshore Beautification MSTU was created to provide certain streetscape and right-of-way improvements in the CRA area generally south of US 41. The Haldeman Creek MSTU was created for maintenance dredging and navigational marker maintenance. Projected revenues for these two MSTUs use a similar approach as described for the TIF calculations above. Note that revenues stem directly from millages (as opposed to an increment difference with a base year as in the case of the TIF revenues). Additionally, the MSTU growth percentages are based on projected growth for the land use mix in the area, resulting in different average annual taxable value growth rate percentages than those in the TIF scenarios. The percentages used are: Bayshore: • Low: 3.98% •Medium: 4.18% • High: 4.52% Haldeman Creek: • Low: 4.01% • Medium: 4.21% • High: 4.55% See Tables 5-6-4 through 5-6-6 for Bayshore Beautification MSTU projected revenues and 5-6-7 through 5-6-9 for Haldeman Creek MSTU projected revenues. Note that the project planning in Section 5.4 showed revenues only through 2030 since this period had a given timeframe; the tables in this section show projected revenues out to 2048 to give a sense of future revenues, although any long-term post -2030 funding opportunities would need to be determined based on actual project implementation timing. Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 148 1 5.6 TAX INCREMENT & MSTU ESTIMATES 5-6-3 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 x: 9�.: 7701,076,000 $412,995,000 42,976,000 $454,895,000 3.5645 0.8069 $1,399,000 $317,000 $1,716,000 2020 $788,668,000 $500,587,000 3.5645 0.8069 $1,540,000 $349,000 $1,889,000 2021 $835,148,000 $547,067,000 3.5645 0.8069 $1,695,000 $384,000 $2,079,000 2022 $887,089,000 $599,008,000 3.5645 0.8069 $1,853,000 $419,000 $2,272,000 2023 $940,889,000 $652,808,000 3.5645 0.8069 $2,028,000 $459,000 $2,487,000 2024 $996,947,000 $708,866,000 3.5645 0.8069 $2,211,000 $500,000 $2,711,000 2025 $1,047,610,000 $759,529,000 3.5645 0.8069 $2,400,000 $543,000 $2,943,000 2026 $1,093,898,000 $805,817,000 3.5645 0.8069 $2,572,000 $582,000 $3,154,000 2027 $1,139,554,000 $851,473,000 3.5645 0.8069 $2,729,000 $618,000 $3,347,000 2028 $1,186,165,000 $898,084,000 3.5645 0.8069 $2,883,000 $653,000 $3,536,000 2029 $1,233,732,000 $945,651,0003.5645 0.8069 $3,041,000 $688,000 $3,729,000 2030 3.56451 0.8069 $3,202,000 $725,000 $3,927,000 Total $27,553,000 $6,237,000 $33,490,00P'' Table 5-6-1: Scenario #1 Projected TIF Revenues h Notes: 1. Source: Scenario #1 projected taxable values for the Bayshore CRA. Average annual growth at 5.2%. Note that the firstfi've years of projected values are obtained from Florida's Office of Economic & Demographic Research (EDR) Revenue Estimating Conference. http.//edcstate.fl.us/Content/ conferences/advalorem/index.cfm; rounded to thousands 2. Taxable value for each year (Item 1) less the base year taxable value of $288,081,106; rounded to thousands 3. For each fund, the tax increment for the previous year multiplied by the milldge, divided by 1,000 and reduced by 5%. Note that the revenues for each year are offset against the tax increment changes due to timing of collections (i.e, the revenue for 2019 is based on the tax increment change from 2017 to 2018); rounded to thousands 5-6-3 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 14B TAX INCREMENT & MSTU ES A ES 2018 $701,076,000 $412,995,000 2019 $742,976,000 $454,895,000 3.5645 0.8069 $1,399,000 $317,000 $1,716,000 2020 $788,668,000 $500,587,000 3.56451 0.8069 $1,540,000 $349,000 $1,889,000 2021 $835,148,000 $547,067,000 3.5645 0.8069 $1,695,000 $384,000 $2,079,000 2022 $887,089,000 $599,008,000 3.5645 0.8069 $1,853,000 $419,000 $2,272,000 s, 2023 $940,889,000 $652,808,000 3.5645 0.8069 $2,028,000 $459,000 $2,487,000 2024 $996,947,000 $708,866,000 3.5645 0.8069 $2,211,000 $500,000 $2,711,000 2025 $1,049,405,000 $761,324,000 3.56451 0.8069 $2,400,000 $543,000 $2,943,000 2026 $1,104,810,000 $816,729,000 3.5645 0.8069 $2,578,000 $584,000 $3,162,000 2027 $1,162,466,000 $874,385,000 3.5645 0.8069 $2,766,000 $626,000 $3,392,000 2028 $1,221,578,000 $933,497,000 3.5645 0.8069 $2,961,000 $670,000 $3,631,000 2029 $1,282,147,000 $994,066,000 3.5645 0.8069 $3,161,000 $716,000 $3,877,000 2030 1 3.56451 0.8069 $3,366,000 $762,000 $4,128,000 Total $27,958,000 $6,329,000 9 4,287,000' Table 5-6-2: Scenario #2 Projected TIF Revenues Notes: 1, Source: Scenario #2 projected taxable values for the Bayshore CRA. Average annual growth at 5.6%. Note that the first five years of projected values are obtained from Florida's Office of Economic & Demographic Research (EDR) Revenue Estimating Conference. http.//edr.state.fl.us/Content/ , conferences/advalorem/index.cfm; rounded to thousands 2. Taxable value for each year (item 1) less the base year taxable value of $288,081,106; rounded to thousands 3. For each fund, the tax increment for the previous year multiplied by the milloge, divided by 1,000 and reduced by 5%. Note that the revenues for each year are offset against the tax increment changes due to timing of collections (i.e., the revenue for 2019 is based on the tax increment change from n 2017 to 2018); rounded to thousands �i 5� I v e 6in , (y rl Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 5-6-4 Q 14B I 5.6 TAX INCREMENT & MSTU ESTIMATES y 2018 $701,076,000 $412,995,000 - - - - 2019 $742,976,000 $454,895,000 3.5645 0.8069 $1,399,000 $317,000 $1,716,000 2020 $788,668,000 $500,587,000 3.5645 0.8069 $1,540,000 $349,000 $1,889,000 * 2021 $835,148,000 $547,067,000 3.5645 0.8069 $1,695,000 $384,000 $2,079,000 2022 $887,089,000 $599,008,000 3.5645 0.8069 $1,853,000 $419,000 $2,272,000 2023 $940,889,000 $652,808,000 3.5645 0.8069 $2,028,000 $459,000 $2,487,000 2024 $996,947,000 $708,866,000 3.5645 0.8069 $2,211,000 $500,000 $2,711,000 2025 $1,075,710,000 $787,629,000 3.5645 0.8069 $2,400,000 $543,000 $2,943,000 2026 $1,138,185,000 $850,104,000 3.5645 0.8069 $2,667,000 $604,000 $3,271,000 2027 $1,202,734,000 $914,653,000 3.5645 0.8069 $2,879,000 $652,000 $3,531,000 2028 $1,269,358,000 $981,277,000 3.5645 0.8069 $3,097,000 $701,000 $3,798,000 2029 $1,338,058,000 $1,049,977,000 3.5645 0.8069 $3,323,000 $752,000 $4,075,000 2030 3.5645 0.8069 $3,556,000 $805,0001 $4,361,000 Total $28,648,000 $6,485,0001 $35,133,000' .s Table 5-6-3: Scenario p3 Projected TIF Revenues j Notes: 1. Source: Scenario N3 projected taxable values for the Bayshore CRA. Average annual growth at 6.0%. Note that thefirst five years of projected values are obtained from Florida's Office of Economic & Demographic Research (EDR) Revenue Estimating Conference. http.//edr.state.fl.us/Content/ conferences/advolorem/index.cfm; rounded to thousands 2. Taxable value for each year (Item 1) less the base year taxable value of $288,081,106; rounded to thousands 3. For each fund, the tax increment for the previous year multiplied by the millage, divided by 1,000 and reduced by 5%. Note that the revenues for each year are offset against the tax increment changes due to timing of collections (i.e., the revenue for 2019 is based on the tax increment change from M 2017 to 2018); rounded to thousands a. 5-6-5 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 148 TAX INCREMENT & MSTU ESTIMATES 2018 � $556,396,000 - F - 2019 $591,115,000 95% 2.3604 $1,248,00 2020 $625,527,000 95% 2.3604 $1,326,00 2021 $660,035,000 95% 2.3604 $1,403,00 2022 $694,831,000 95% 2.3604 $1,480,00 2023 $730,024,000 95% 2.3604 $1,558,00 2024 $765,675,000 95% 2.3604 $1,637,00 2025 $801,820,000 95% 2.3604 $1,717,00 2026 $838,479,000 95% 2.3604 $1,798,00 2027 $875,663,000 95% 2.3604 $1,880,00 2028 $913,376,000 95% 2.3604 $1,964,00 2029 $951,615,000 95% 2.3604 $2,048,00 2030 $990,376,000 95% 2.3604 $2,134,00 2031 $1,029,652,000 95% 2.3604 $2,221,00 2032 $1,069,435,000 95% 2.3604 $2,309,00 2033 $1,109,713,000 95% 2.3604 $2,398,00 2034 $1,150,478,000 95% 2.3604 $2,488,00 2035 $1,191,719,000 95% 2.3604 $2,580,00 2036 $1,233,426,000 95% 2.3604 $2,672,00 2037 $1,275,588,000 95% 2.3604 $2,766,00 2038 $1,318,197,000 95% 2.3604 $2,860,00 2039 $1,361,244,000 95% 2.3604 $2,956,00 2040 $1,404,721,000 95% 2.3604 $3,052,00 2041 $1,448,622,000 95% 2.3604 $3,150,00 2042 $1,492,942,000 95% 2.3604 $3,248,00 2043 $1,537,676,000 95% 2.3604 $3,348,00 2044 $1,582,821,000 95% 2.3604 $3,448,00 2045 $1,628,376,000 95% 2.3604 $3,549,00 2046 $1,674,341,000 95% 2.3604 $3,651,00 2047 $1,720,719,000 95% 2.3604 $3,755,00 2048 - 95% 2.3604 $3,859,00 Total - FY 2018-49: $74,503,00 Table 5-6-4: Bayshore Beautification MSTU Scenario #1 Projected Revenues Notes: there is a 5% statutory reduction requirement for counties when projecting for budget; projected revenue collected the year following the year on which the valuation is based (e.g., milloge applied to 2047 valuation collected in 2048); rounded to thousands Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 5-6-6 U 148 1 TAX INCREMENT & MSTU ESTIMATES 121 2018 $564,586,000 - - - 2019 $606,550,000 95% 2.3604 $1,266,000 $1,793,307,000 2020 $647,829,000 95% 2.3604 $1,360,000 95% 2021 $688,974,000 95% 2.3604 $1,453,000 2.3604 2022 $730,243,000 95% 2.3604 $1545,000 $80,079,000 2023 $771,769,000 95% 2.3604 $1,637,000 2024 $813,623,000 95% 2.3604 $1,731,000 2025 $855,838,000 95% 2.3604 $1,824,000 2026 $898,424,000 95% 2.3604 $1,919,000 2027 $941,378,000 95% 2.3604 $2,015,000 2028 $984,686,000 95% 2.3604 $2,111,000 2029 $1,028,329,000 95% 2.3604 $2,208,000 2030 $1,072,280,000 95% 2.3604 $2,306,000 2031 $1,116,512,000 95% 2.3604 $2,404,000 2032 $1,160,995,000 95% 2.3604 $2,504,000 2033 $1,205,697,000 95% 2.3604 $2,603,000 2034 $1,250,586,000 95% 2.3604 $21704,000 2035 $1,295,630,000 95% 2.3604 $2,804,000 2036 $1,340,798,000 95% 2.3604 $2,905,000 2037 $1,386,060,000 95% 2.3604 $3,007,000 2038 $1,431,386,000 95% 2.3604 $3,108,000 2039 $1,476,747,000 95% 2.3604 $3,210,000 2040 $1,522,118,000 95% 2.3604 $3,311,000 2041 $1,567,474,000 95% 2.3604 $3,413,000 2042 $1,612,792,000 95% 2.3604 $3,515,000 2043 $1,658,052,000 95% 2.3604 $3,616,000 2044 $1,703,235,000 95% 2.3604 $3,718,000 2045 $1,748,324,000 95% 2.3604 $3,819,000 2046 $1,793,307,000 95% 2.3604 $3,920,000 2047 $1,838,170,000 95% 2.3604 $4,021,000 2048 - 95% 2.3604 $4,122,000 Total FY 2018-49: $80,079,000 Table 5-6-5: Boyshore Beautification MSTU Scenario #2 Projected Revenues Notes: there is a 5% statutory reduction requirement for counties when projecting for budget projected revenue collected the year following the year on which the valuation is based (eg, milloge applied to 2047 valuation collected in 2048) rounded to thousands —May 20195 6-7 Ba shore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan TAX INCREMENT & MSTU ESTIMATES 2018 $570,658,000 k - - - 2019 $618,846,000 95% 2.3604 $1,280,000 2020 $666,424,000 95% 2.3604 $1,388,000 2021 $714,014,000 95% 2.3604 $1,494,000 2022 $761,899,000 95% 2.3604 $1,601,000 2023 $810,218,000 95% 2.3604 $1,708,000 2024 $859,037,000 95% 2.3604 $1,817,000 2025 $908,378,000 95% 2.3604 $1,926,000 2026 $958,236,000 95% 2.3604 $2,037,000 2027 $1,008,590,000 95% 2.3604 $2,149,000 2028 $1,059,406,000 95% 2.3604 $2,262,000 2029 $1,110,643,000 95% 2.3604 $2,376,000 2030 $1,162,251,000 95% 2.3604 $2,490,000 2031 $1,214,180,000 95% 2.3604 $2,606,000 2032 $1,266,376,000 95% 2.3604 $2,723,000 2033 $1,318,783,000 95% 2.3604 $2,840,000 2034 $1,371,346,000 95% 2.3604 $2,957,000 2035 $1,424,009,000 95% 2.3604 $3,075,000 2036 $1,476,717,000 95% 2.3604 $3,193,000 2037 $1,529,417,000 95% 2.3604 $3,311,000 2038 $1,582,058,000 95% 2.3604 $3,430,000 2039 $1,634,591,000 95% 2.3604 $3,548,000 2040 $1,686,969,000 95% 2.3604 $3,665,000 2041 $1,739,148,000 95% 2.3604 $3,783,000 2042 $1,791,089,000 95% 2.3604 $3,900,000 2043 $1,842,753,000 95% 2.3604 $4,016,000 2044 $1,894,108,000 95% 2.3604 $4,132,000 2045 $1,945,121,000 95% 2.3604 $4,247,000 2046 $1,995,767,000 95% 2.3604 $4,362,000 2047 $2,046,022,000 95% 2.3604 $4,475,000 2048 - 95% 2.3604 $4,588,000 Total - FY 2018-49: $87,379,000 Table 5-5-6: Bayshore Beautification MSTU Scenario #3 Projected Revenues Notes: there is a 5% statutory reduction requirement for counties when projecting for budget; projected revenue collected the year following the year on which the valuation is based (e.g., millage applied to 2047 valuation collected in 2048); rounded to thousands Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 5-6-8 0 146 1 TAX INCREMENT & MSTU ESTIMATES 2019 $121,368,000 95% 1.0000 $108,000 2020 $128,527,000 95% 1.0000 $115,000 2021 $135,705,000 95% 1.0000 $122,000 2022 $142,943,000 95% 1.0000 $129,000 2023 $150,263,000 95% 1.0000 $136,000 2024 $157,677,000 95% 1.0000 $143,000 2025 $165,193,000 95% 1.0000 $150,000 2026 $172,815,000 95% 1.0000 $157,000 2027 $180,545,000 95% 1.0000 $164,000 2028 $188,384,000 95% 1.0000 $172,000 2029 $196,330,000 95% 1.0000 $179,000 2030 $204,383,000 95% 1.0000 $187,000 2031 $ 212,541,000 95% 1.0000 $194,000 2032 $220,801,000 95% 1.0000 $202,000 2033 $229,163,000 95% 1.0000 $210,000 2034 $237,623,000 95% 1.0000 $218,000 2035 $246,178,000 95% 1.0000 $226,000 2036 $254,828,000 95% 1.0000 $234,000 2037 $263,569,000 95% 1.0000 $242,000 2038 $272,399,000 95% 1.0000 $250,000 2039 $281,317,000 95% 1.0000 $259,000 2040 $290,320,000 95% 1.0000 $267,000 2041 $299,407,000 95% 1.0000 $276,000 2042 $308,577,000 95% 1.0000 $284,000 2043 $317,829,000 95% 1.0000 $293,000 2044 $327,161,000 95% 1.0000 $302,000 2045 $336,574,000 95% 1.0000 $311,000 2046 $346,067,000 95% 1.0000 $320,000 2047 $355,641,000 95% 1.0000 $329,000 2048 - 95% 1.0000 $338,000 Total - FY 2018-49: $6,517,000 Table 5-6-7: Haldeman Creek MSTU Scenario M1 Projected Revenues Notes: there is a S% statutory reduction requirement for counties when projecting for budget, projected revenue collected the year following the year on which the valuation is based (e.g., milloge applied to 2047 valuation collected in 2048); rounded to thousands 5-6-9 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 14B TAX INCREMENT & MSTU ESTIMATES -5°6 F2018 $115,836,000 - - - 2019 $124,558,000 95% 1.0000 $110,000 2020 $133,140,000 95% 1.0000 $118,000 2021 $141,695,000 95% 1.0000 $126,000 2022 $150,278,000 95% 1.0000 $135,000 2023 $158,915,000 95% 1.0000 $143,000 2024 $167,620,000 95% 1.0000 $151,000 2025 $176,401,000 95% 1.0000 $159,000 2026 $185,259,000 95% 1.0000 $168,000 2027 $194,193,000 95% 1.0000 $176,000 2028 $203,200,000 95% 1.0000 $184,000 2029 $212,276,000 95% 1.0000 $193,000 2030 $221,414,000 95% 1.0000 $202,000 2031 $230,610,000 95% 1.0000 $210,000 2032 $239,856,000 95% 1.0000 $219,000 2033 $249,146,000 95% 1.0000 $228,000 2034 $258,472,000 95% 1.0000 $237,000 2035 $267,828,000 95% 1.0000 $246,000 2036 $277,207,000 95% 1.0000 $254,000 2037 $286,603,000 95% 1.0000 $263,000 2038 $296,008,000 95% 1.0000 $272,000 2039 $305,418,000 95% 1.0000 $281,000 2040 $314,825,000 95% 1.0000 $290,000 2041 $324,226,000 95% 1.0000 $299,000 2042 $333,615,000 95% 1.0000 $308,000 2043 $342,987,000 95% 1.0000 $317,000 2044 $352,339,000 95% 1.0000 $326,000 2045 $361,667,000 95% 1.0000 $335,000 2046 $370,967,000 95% 1.0000 $344,000 2047 $380,238,000 95% 1.0000 $352,000 2048 - 95% 1.0000 $361,000 Total FY 2018-49: $7,007,000 Table 5-6-8: Haldeman Creek MSTU Scenario #2 Projected Revenues Nates: there is a 5% statutory reduction requirement for counties when projecting for budget, projected revenue collected the year following the year on which the valuation is based (e.g., milloge applied to 2047 valuation collected in 2048), rounded to thousands Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 5-6-10 5•6 TAX INCREMENT &MSTU ESTIMATES 114 14B 1 2018 k $117,093,000 - - - 2019 $127,106,000 95% 1.0000 $111,000 2020 $136,995,000 95% 1.0000 $121,000 2021 $146,888,000 95% 1.0000 $130,000 2022 $156,844,000 95% 1.0000 $140,000 2023 $166,892,000 95% 1.0000 $149,000 2024 $177,044,000 95% 1.0000 $159,000 2025 $187,305,000 95% 1.0000 $168,000 2026 $197,673,000 95% 1.0000 $178,000 2027 $208,144,000 95% 1.0000 $188,000 2028 $218,710,000 95% 1.0000 $198,000 2029 $229,362,000 95% 1.0000 $208,000 2030 $240,089,000 95% 1.0000 $218,000 2031 $250,880,000 95% 1.0000 $228,000 2032 $261,724,000 95% 1.0000 $238,000 2033 $272,609,000 95% 1.0000 $249,000 2034 $283,523,000 95% 1.0000 $259,000 2035 $294,454,000 95% 1.0000 $269,000 2036 $305,390,000 95% 1.0000 $280,000 2037 $316,321,000 95% 1.0000 $290,000 2038 $327,234,000 95% 1.0000 $301,000 2039 $338,119,000 95% 1.0000 $311,000 a 2040 $348,967,000 95% 1.0000 $321,000 2041 $359,769,000 95% 1.0000 $332,000 2042 $370,514,000 95% 1.0000 $342,000 2043 $381,197,000 95% 1.0000 $352,000 2044 $391,809,000 95% 1.0000 $362,000 2045 $402,344,000 95% 1.0000 $372,000 2046 $412,795,000 95% 1.0000 $382,000 2047 $423,159,000 95% 1.0000 $392,000 2048 - 95% 1.0000 $402,000 Total - FY 2018-49: $7,650,000 Table 5-6-9: Haldeman Creek MSTU Scenario #3 Projected Revenues Notes: there is a 5% statutory reduction requirement for counties when projecting for budget; projected revenue collected the year following the year on which the valuation is based (e.g., miNage applied to 2047 valuation collected in 2048); rounded to thousands 5-6-11 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 14B TAX INCREMENT & MSTU ESTIMATES 5.6.3 Underlying Assumptions The following charts show underlying population and tax value trends that inform and contextualize the revenue projections calculations presented in this section. Figure 5-6-1 shows that the rate of population growth for Collier County has decreased sizably since 2002/2003, with a more gradual decrease projected out from 2017/2018 through 2030. In terms of historic tax value growth rates since 2000, Figure 5-6-2 shows that there was an increase during the lead up to the recession, followed by a drop during the recession itself. In recent years, the rate has gradually risen. Given the sizable changes during the lead -up to the recession and the recession itself, the model used to generate TIF projections was matched to longer historical trends in County taxable values, from the 1970s through 2003/2004 historical taxable value for Collier County. Figure 5-6-3 shows the historical trend used for guidance in blue; this trend is continued for comparison to projection calculations (in this case, for the low revenue projections, shown by the grey line through 2030). The orange line indicates historic data that was excluded from the historic trend basis since it was considered an anomaly. 4.50% 4.00% 3.50% 3.00% 2.50% 2.00% 1.50% 1.00 0.50% 0.00 Annual Population Growth Rate (2000-2030) O N M aa OON 8 S O . N M V V W , W N O N N N N VN ON NN WN NM O . . O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O �J N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Figure 5-6-1: Population Growth Rate Trends and Projections (2000-2030) Source: BEER, Volume 51, Bulletin 180, January 2018 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 5-6-12 TAX INCREMENT & MSTU ESTIMATES 146 1 50,0 40,0% 0.(r/u 20, 1(0110 OD% lop 2 01 000 2(X01 2002 2003 2(YJ 2005 2W6 21X)1 8 200'0 2010 2 2 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 10.(/11 ' -20.0 -30.0 Figure 5-6-2: Trends in Tax Value Growth Rates (2000-2017) Source: Florida Property Valuations and Tax Datobook & EDR Ad Valorem Revenue Estimating Conference Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 14B TAX INCREMENT & MSTU ESTIMATES Conclusion With the recovery from the recession of 2008, the CRA area is poised for revitalization via investment, development, and redevelopment. With this update, the CRA will be able to continue the general mission of redevelopment that it set out when the Bayshore Gateway Triangle redevelopment area was first created in 2000. The CRA can move forward with the more detailed planning and evaluation for the suggested implementation items of this Redevelopment Area Plan with the guidance of the overall vision, allowing for change and also protecting and enhancing what defines the area and makes it unique. 4000 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 5-6-14 146 1 Section 6 Relocation Procedures Relocation of residents and businesses displaced, as a result of property acquisition by the CRA will follow procedures, which fulfill the intent of the law and objectives stated below. Collier County uses the Florida Department of Transportation relocation policy as a guideline which is based on the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Assistance Act of 1970 of the U.S. Federal Government. In those cases in which.acquisition and relocation are to be utilized, the following'general policy and guidelines shall apply unless the CRA chooses to adopt a separate relocation policy from time to time for a specific project. Displacement Policy and Guidelines: "Displacement" means the involuntary movement; except temporary relocation, of a household from a dwelling unit resulting from its acquisition, rehabilitation, or demolition, or a code enforcement activity. Relocation benefits will be received, on a uniform basis, by displaced families or persons following the guidelines of this policy. Activities which result in displacement action or in whichdisplacement may occur shall take into account options and effects to minimize displacement whenever possible. Policy Applicability This policy and guidelines shall be used for redevelopment activities as a Local Displacement Policy, only when comprehensive treatment (an area which is effected by social, economical, and capital 'improvements as well as rehabilitation) in a target area is used. ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS Designated Target Areas: Relocation benefits are available to eligible households residing in dwelling ,units located in redevelopment target areas only when comprehensive treatment is used. Occupancy Requirements Owner/Occupant: A person will be considered an owner/occupant if he/she actually owned and occupied the dwelling unit for not less than 980 consecutive days immediately prior to the Minimum Housing Code .Inspection of the dwelling unit.. .Tenant: A person will be considered a tenant if he/she lawfully occupied the rental dwelling for not less than 90 consecutive days immediately prior to Minimum Housing Code Inspection.of the dwelling unit. Purchaser/Occupant: A person will be considered a purchaser -occupant if he/she occupied the dwelling unit for not less than 180 consecutive days immediately prior to Minimum Housing Code Inspection of the dwelling unit under a bona fide, written Agreement for Deed. Business: The occupants, for not less than 90 consecutive days immediately prior to Minimum Housing Code Inspection, of the dwelling in which the business is located, Written Notice: Determination of Displacement A person or business will be considered displaced as a result of redevelopment activities only if the displacement move occurs as a result of and after receipt of a written notice of eligibility for displacement benefits. Adequate time will be provided to the displace to locate suitable .temporary or permanent i housing. 102 14B Relation of Displacement Payments to Income and Assets Displacement payments are not to be considered as income or for determining eligibility of a person or business under housing assistance programs. Displacement payments are not to be considered as assets for determining eligibility for H.U.D. or other public housing programs. Condition of the Replacement Dwelling as a Criterion for Payment When the replacement dwelling selected by the displace does not meet the local minimum housing code, the Community Redevelopment Agency has a responsibility for providing continuing assistance to facilitate the claimant's move to a replacement dwelling that meets the local minimum housing code. BENEFITS AND ASSISTANCE Displacement Policy: Minimizing Impacts Relocation payments and assistance will be made bn a uniform basis to all those eligible without regard to race, color, religion, handicap, sex, age or source of income. Persons or businesses eligible for benefits and assistance are cautioned not to make any move before receiving approval from Collier County. This provision must be strictly adhered to inasmuch as unapproved moves. could result in denial of benefits and assistance. Benefits to be provided will be made as established in this relocation plan and all payments made under this policy shall be deemed appropriate by Collier County. Project or program activities shall be planned and carried out in a manner that minimizes hardship to site occupants. Persons or businesses to be displaced shall be afforded the opportunity of participating in the formulation of relocation plans and shall be provided full information relating to program or project activities which may have an impact on the residents and businesses of the project or program area. Arrangements shall be made to provide relocation assistance in accordance with the needs of those to be displaced, including social services counseling, guidance assistance, and referrals, as well as housing counseling. Relocation shall be carried out in a manner that will promote maximum choice within the community's total housing supply; lessen racial, ethnic, and economic concentrations; and facilitate desegregation and racially inclusive patterns of occupancy and use of public and private facilities. Services to Minimize Displacement Impacts: Services shall be provided to all persons and businesses being displaced to assure that the relocation process will not result in different or separate treatment on account of race, color, religion, sex, age, or source of income. Eligible persons and businesses shall be fully informed at the earliest possible date as to the availability of relocation payments and assistance, and tile eligibility requirements, as well as the procedures for obtaining such payments and assistance. Direct personal interviews will be utilized to determine the extent of the need of each eligible person and business for relocation assistance. Displacement Housinq Benefits Redevelopment Condemnation/Demolition and Rehabilitation A family person or business displaced under this Section* is eligible for a displacement benefit for a comparable replacement dwelling as determined by family composition or business. - Owner/occupants who elect to purchase a replacement dwelling are eligible for a maxim m payment of $15,000.00. 103 148 1 Tenants are eligible for a displacement housing payment of up to $4,000.00 rental assistance, or down payment assistance. Owner/occupants who do not elect to purchase another housing unit are eligible for a replacement housing payment equivalent to four years rental assistance, but not to exceed $4,000.00. Computation of rental assistance payments shall be based on the current Fair Market Rents. Moving Expense and Dislocation Allowance Families and persons permanently vacating their dwelling because of Condemnation/Demolition or Rehabilitation activities are eligible for a one time moving expense allowance of up to $500.00 to help defray costs involved in displacement. Businesses: The occupant of the dwelling is eligible for a moving payment of up to $10,000.00 to relocate the business to a decent, safe, and sanitary dwelling. Finality of Payment The total approved amount of a relocation payment is not subject to later computation except to correct an error or to implement findings on review in accordance with established procedures. Temporary Displacement Benefits Temporary Displacement Benefits, when authorized, shall be fully documented and approved by the Administrator of Community Development and Environmental Services. Temporary benefits shall discontinue upon issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. Approved costs in connection with a temporary displacement include: 1. Actual reasonable moving cost to and from temporary accommodations which must be located within Collier County, These costs can be one of the following: a) Actual invoice cost of a certified moving contractor. b) A $300.OQ total allowance if a self -move. c), A $100.00 total allowance if displacement does not involve household furnishings. 2. Actual reasonable cost. of renting or sharing a temporary dwelling excluding deposits and installation charges. Temporary housing accommodations can be one of the following depending upon the composition of the displaced household and available accommodations: a) A dwelling reserved, exclusively for temporary relocation housing. b) Other adequate housing. c) A motel, only when displacement is less than 15 days. 3, Actual reasonable costs for storage of furniture that cannot be housed in the temporary unit, not to exceed the benefit period for temporary housing. 4. Businesses are not eligible for temporary displacement benefits. In all cases, the temporary displacement dwelling must be inspected and approved by the Community Redevelopment Agency as decent, safe, and sanitary. , DOCUMENTATION, ASSURANCES, AND SERVICES 104 148 1 Displacement Plan Implementation J The Collier County Community Redevelopment Agency is, the assigned administrative implementing agency for displacement and shall use the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Handbook 1371.1, Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition, for assistance and guidance in implementing this policy. Equal Opportunity In carrying out displacement actions, the Collier County Community Redevelopment Agency shall take affirmative actions to provide displaced families, individuals and businesses maximum opportunities in selecting replacement dwellings within the community's total housing supply. Affirmative Action shall take place to lessen racial, ethnic, and economic concentrations; and facilitate desegregation and racially inclusive patterns of occupancy and use of public and private facilities. Notification of Availability of Payments As soon as it is ascertained that a family or business displacement is imminent, the Community Redevelopment Agency shall provide them with written notification of the specific types of relocation payments for which the displace is apparently eligible and the estimation of the benefits that may be received. Housing.- Referrals Current and continuing information will be provided on the availability, prices of comparable sales and rental dwellings. Assurances will be provided that, within a reasonable period of time prior to displacement, there will be available comparable decent, safe, and sanitary replacement dwellings meeting the Collier County Minimum Housing Standards, equal in number and available to eligible persons and businesses who will be displaced. Supportive Services Necessary advisory services will be provided to eligible persons and businesses, such as counseling and referrals with regard to housing, financing, employment, training, health, welfare and other assistance in orderto minimize any hardships incurred. Each eligible person shall be assisted in completing any required applications and forms. RELOCATION PROCEDURE REQUIREMENTS Case File Records: Case file records shall be maintained for each displaced person/ family or business. Record keeping standards shall follow the HUD Relocation Handbook as guidance. 105 146 1 Management Control System: A Management Control System shall be established to identify the size and composition of the displacement/relocation workload. Management Control Standards shall follow the HUD Relocation Handbook as guidance, Opinions of the County Attorney Opinions of the County Attorney concerning legality of actions or procedures shall .be sought and incorporated as required. Notices and Correspondence Notices'to affected parties and decisions shall be in writing or a part of a written case file record. Written records shall be kept in accordance with Collier County policy. Procedural Guidance and Standards HUD Handbook 1376.1, Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition shall be used as guidance for procedures and standards for displacement activities. APPEALS PROCEDURE A formal appeal procedure has been established and maintained for use by displaced persons and businesses seeking administrative review of agency determinations in connection with displacement payments and/or adequacy of replacement housing, Appeals ,of -this Displacement Policy must be presented in writing. The Community Redevelopment Appeals Panel consisting of the Administrator of the Community Development and Environmental Services Division and one resident property owner of affected area appointed by the County Manger is assigned the administration of appeals of the Local Displacement Policy. Timing for Initiating.Appeal An appeal concerning eligibility for, or the amount of, a displacement benefit shall be filed within six months after the Community Redevelopment Agency's notification to the person of its determination of a displacement case, An. appeal alleging failure to provide appropriate housing referrals or to properly inspect the replacement dwelling shall be filed not later than six months after the person's displacement. Appeal The appeal may include any related statement of fact or other material. Assistance to Person Makinq Appeal If a person or business is unable to prepare a written appeal, the Community Redevelopment Agency shall offer them appropriate assistance and notify them of other available sources of assistance. Scope of Review of Written Appeal: The Community Redevelopment Appeals Panel shall consider a person's or business' written appeal, regardless of form. In deciding the appeal, the Community Redevelopment Appeals Panel shall consider: 1) All applicable rules and regulations; 2) All pertinent justification and written material submitted by the person making the appeal; and 3) -All material upon which the Community Redevelopment Agency based the determination (s) being appealed and any other available information that is needed to insure a fair and full review of the appeal. 106 14B 1 However, the Community Redevelopment Appeals Panel must ensure that the person making the appeal has had reasonable opportunity to review any such materials and information on which an adverse ruling on the appeal may be based. Request for Additional Time If a person or business makes a request for additional time to gather and prepare information for a written appeal, the person or business must be granted 30 days additional time, in addition to the time limits established by this policy. This request must be documented by the Community Redevelopment Appeals Panel. Determination and Notification after Written Appeal Within 30 days after receipt of information submitted by a person or business in support of their appeal, the Community Redevelopment Appeals Panel shall make written determination on the appeal and furnish the person with a copy. The written determination shall include, but need not be limited to: 1) The Community Redevelopment Appeals Panel's decision upon review of the appeal; 2) Thefactual and legal basis upon which the decision is based, including any pertinent explanation; 3) If any payment or other relief to the person or business is granted, a brief statement on how this will be provided; 4) If the relief requested is not granted, a statement of the person or business right to appeal to the County Commission within 30 days. 107 l48 1 APPENDIX A 148 1 12 C 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2000- 82 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, RELATING TO COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT; MAKING FINDINGS; FINDING BLIGHTED AREAS EXIST IN THE COUNTY; FINDING THE REHABILITATION, CONSERVATION OR REDEVELOPMENT OF SUCH AREAS IS NECESSARY IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST; FINDING A SPECIFIED AREA TO BE A BLIGHTED AREA AND A COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AREA; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT WITH OTHER RESOLUTIONS AND SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has received and considered a report and presentation by County staff and consultant which Identified conditions within the boundaries of Collier County in the areas Identified, described and depicted on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part of this resolution (the "Area"); and WHEREAS, after having considered the determinations and the facts and evidence of conditions In the Area and has received and considered such other evidence of the conditions In the Area as have been presented to It, the Board of County Commissloners desires to proceed in accordance with the authorization and powers granted by Part III, Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, to establish the necessary means by which redevelopment can be accomplished In the Area and that certain actions are appropriate and necessary and should be taken to address the conditions now present and expected to be present in the Area; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AS FOLLOWS: Section 1, Findings, The Board of County Commissioners does hereby find: (a) Based upon the facts and evidence presented to and considered by the Board of County Commissioners, the following conditions exist In the Area: 1. Conditions are present in the Area that are detrimental to the sound growth of the county and which substantially Impair or arrest the growth within the 14B 1 12 C 1 Area, and present conditions and uses In the Area are detrimental to the public health, safety, morals and public welfare; and 2. There Is a predominance of inadequate or defective street layout; and 3. There Is faulty and Inadequate lot layout In relation to size, adequacy, accessibility, or usefulness; and 4. There are unsanitary conditions as such relates to the conditions of the sanitary system and there are unpaved and deteriorating roadways resulting In unsafe public conditions; and 5. There has been a deterioration of site and other improvements; and 6. There is a diversity of ownership or defective or unusual conditions of title, which prevent the free alienability of land, (b) The notices required by Section 163.346, Florida Statutes (1999), have been timely published or mailed in accordance with said statute. (c) Action must be taken Immediately to prevent further blight and deterioration and to protect and enhance public expenditures previously made In the Area. Section 2. Ending of Ne ossfty, The Board of County Commissioners, based upon evidence presented to it and in the public record, does hereby find that one or more "blighted areas" (as defined in Section 163.340(8), Florida Statutes), exist within Collier County, Florida, and, further finds that the rehabilitation, conservation or redevelopment, or a combination thereof, of such area or areas described is necessary in the interest of the public health, safety, morals or welfare of the residents of Collier County, Florida. Section 3. Communt Redevelopment Area. Based upon the facts presented to It and contained In the public record, the Board of County Commissioners does hereby find the Area (as hereinbefore defined) Is a "blighted area" (as that term is defined In Section 163.340(8), Florida Statutes (1999), and that such area constitutes a 12 C l "community redevelopment area" as defined In Section 163.340(10), Florida Statutes (1999). Section 4, Conflicts. All resolutions and parts of resolutions in conflict with any of the provisions of this resolution are hereby repealed, provided, however, nothing herein is Intended nor should be applied to affect, repeal, alter, amend or supersede any previous resolutions adopted by the Board of County Commissioners finding any other area or areas within Collier County to be a "blighted area" for purposes of the Community Redevelopment Act. Section 5. Severability, If any section or portion of a section of this resolution, including any part of the exhibit, proves to be Invalid, unlawful, or unconstitutional, it shall not be held to Invalidate or impair the validity, force, or effect of any other section or part of this resolution. Should either area constituting part of the Area or part thereof shall be severed from the Area and the remainder shall constitute the Area for purposes of this resolultion. Section 6. Effective Data. This resolution shall become effective immediately upon Its passage and adoption. Section 7. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote this WAday of 2000. IF ATTEST: DWIGHT C. BROCK, CLERK Attest a3 to Chat an's stffflntur� cMy. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER ORIDA BY: ' TIMOT*,,k`CONSTAy,AE, CNAIRIVIAN� APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY L � , David C, Weigel County Attorney i 14B 1 EXHIBIT A BAYSHOREIGATEWAY TRIANGLE REDEVELOPMENT AREA DESCRIPTION BEG SW CNR SECT 2, TWP 50, RNG 25, N 630', E 662', S 427', E 200', N 270', E TO THE E RNV LINE OF BROOKSIDE DRIVE, S TO THE SW CNR OF LOT 10, SUNSET SUB, E TO THE SE CNR OF LOT 6, SUNSET SUB, S 92', E TO THE NW CRN OF LOT 55, BLK A, ROCK CREEK PARK, N TO THE NW CNR OF LOT 10, BLK B, ROCK CREEK PARK, E TO THE E SECT LINE SECT 2, TWP 50, RNG 25, S TO THE NW CNR OF SECT 12, TWP 50, RNG 25, E 670',`S 7773', W 200', S 735', W 200', S 990', E 460', S 330', E 972, S 1174', SWLY 481', NWLY 523', SWLY 730' TO THE NELY WW LINE U.S. 41, CONT SWLY TO THE SWLY RNV LINE U.S. 41, NWLY ALG THE SWLY RNV LINE OF U.S. 41 TO ITS INTERSECT WITH THE W R/W LINE OF BAYSHORE DRIVE, S TO THE N R/W LINE OF WEEKS AVE, W 761', N 1355', W TO THE W R/W LINE OF PINE STREET, N TO THE SE CNR OF LOT 2, BLK K, INOMAH SUB, W 100', N TO THE N RNV OF WASHINGTON AVE, CONT NWLY AND WLY ALG NLY R/W LINE WASHINGTON AVE TO THE SW CNR OF LOT 2, BLK C, INOMAH SUB, W TO THE W RNV LINE. OF FREDRICK ST, N TO NE CNR LOT 9, COC -LEE -TERRACE SUB, W TO THE W SECT LINE OF SECT 11, TWP 50, RNG 25, N TO THE SW SECT CNR OF SECT 2, TWP 50, RNG 25 AND THE POB. AND BEG SE CNR SECT 23, TWP 50, RNG 25, N ALG THE E SECT LINES OF SECT 23 AND 14, TWP 50, RNG 25, TO E'/. CNR SECT14, TWP 50, RNG 25, E TO THE SE CNR LOT 6, CREWS SUB, N TO THE S LINE OF HALDEMAN CREEK, E TO THE SWLY RNV LINE OF U.S. 41, NWLY ALG THE SWLY RNV LINE OF U,S. 41 TO ITS INTSECT WITH THE W R/W LINE OF BAYSHORE DRIVE, S TO THE N RNV LINE OF WEEKS AVE, W 761', N 1355', W TO THE W RNV LINE OF PINE STREET, S TO THE S RNV LINE OF MANGROVE STREET, W TO THE NW CNR LOT 14, BLK F, HALDEMAN RIVER SUB, S TO THE N LINE OF HALDEMAN CREEK, SWLY ALG THE N LINE OF HALDEMAN CREEK TO ITS INTSECT WITH THE W SECT LINE OF SECT 14, TWP 50, RNG 25, S ALG THE W SECT LINE OF SECT 14 AND 23, TWP 50, RNG 25, TO THE SW CNR OF SECT 23, TWP 50, RNG 25, E TO THE SE CNR OF SECT 23, TWP 50, RNG 25 AND THE POB. 14B 1 lz C' 1 BEG AT THE NW CNR SEC 25, TWP 46, RNG 28, THENCE E ALG N LINE SEC 25 TO NE CRN OF SEC 25 AND THE NW CNR OF SEC 30, TVP 46 RNG 29, THENCE E ALG THE N LINES OF SECTONS 30, 29, 28, 27, AND 26 TO THE NW CNR OF SEC 25, TWP 46, RNG 29, THENCE S ALG THE. W LINE SEC 25 TO THE NW CNR OF THE SW'/4 OF SW % SEC 25, THENCE E TO THE NE CNR OF THE SW'/ OF SW % SEC 25, THENCE S TO THE S SEC LINE OF SEC 25 AND THE NE CNR OF THE W'/2 OF NW 1/4 OF SEC 36, TWP 46, RNG 29, THENCE S TO THE SE CNR OF THE W %7 OF NW % SEC 36, THENCE W TO THE W'/4 CRN SECTON 36, THENCE S TO THE SW CNR SEC 36 AND THE NW CNR OF SEC 1, TWP 47, RNG 29, THENCE E TO THE NE CNR OF SEC 1 AND THE NW CNR OF SEC 6, TWP 47, RNG 30, THENCE E TO THE NE CNR OF SEC 6, THENCE S TO THE SE CNR OF SEC 6, THENCE W TO THE SW CNR OF SEC 6 AND THE SE CNR OF SEC 1, TWP 47, RNG 29, THENCE W TO THE S'/4 CNR SEC 1 AND THE N'/4 CNR OF SEC 12, TWP 47, RNG 29, THENCE S TO THE S'/4 CNR SEC 12 AND THE N'/4 CNR OF SEC 13, TWP 47, RNG 29, THENCE S TO THE CENTER OF SEC 13, THENCE W TO THE W'/4 CNR SEC 13 AND THE E % CNR OF SEC 14, TWP 47, RNG 29, CONT W TO THE W'/4 CNR OF SEC 14 AND THE E'/4 CNR OF SEC 15, TWP 47, RNG 29, THENCE S TO SE CNR OF SEC 15, THENCE W ALG THE S LINE OF SEC 15 AND 16 TO THE SW CNR OF SEC 16, TWP 47, RNG 29, THENCE N ALG THE W LINE OF SEC 16 AND 9 TO THE NW CNR OF SEC 9, TWP 47, RNG 29 AND THE SE CNR OF SEC 5, TWP 47, RNG 29, THENCE W ALG THE S LINE OF SEC 5 AND 6 TO THE SW CNR OF SEC 6, TWP 47, RNG 29, AND THE SE CNR OF SEC 1, TWP 47, RNG 28, THENCE N TO THE E'/4 CNR OF SEC 1, THENCE W TO THE SHORELINE OF LAKE TRAFFORD, THENCE ALG THE SHORELINE OF LAKE TRAFFORD NELY, NLY, NWLY, WLY, SWLY TO THE INTERSECTON OF THE LAKE TRAFFORD SHORELINE AND THE W SEC LINE OF SEC 35, TWP 46, RNG 28, THENCE N TO THE NW CNR OF SEC 35, THENCE E TO THE NE CNR OF SEC 35 AND THE SW CNR OF SEC 25, TWP 46, RNG 28, THENCE N TO THE NW CNR OF SEC 25 AND THE P.O.B, 14B 1 -4 2 c 1 7 e7 c I T 46 S 6 m IV 10 it w O m 1 T 47 S � 7 �46 S X N W m 3 0 r m �M m 'v o� r N 0 10 V m � 3 m z a X An fill[" W I ki IC6410, WE [I '01 ki 110. n I. INTRODUCTION Page 1 II. STATUTORY DEFINITION Page 1 III. BAYSHORE/GATEWAY TRIANGLE FINDINGS OF CONDITIONS Page 2 Iv. IMMOKALEE FINDINGS OF CONDITIONS Page 8 MAPS Bays ho re/G ateway Triangle Redevelopment Area Immokalee Redevelopment Area Page 7 Page 13 146 1 la(c ) / /112 I. INTRODUCTION The first step in creating a Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) is a "Finding of Necessity" or a finding that one or more geographic areas in a municipality has conditions of "slum or blight", and that there is a need to rehabilitate, conserve and redevelop that area. Accomplished by Resolution of the governing body, this finding means that the rehabilitation, conservation or redevelopment or combination thereof is necessary. On January 11, 2000 the Board of County Commissions directed staff to prepare a Finding of Necessity for two areas with in Collier County: Bayshore/Gateway Triangle and Immokalee. This report details the Findings of Necessity" for the above referenced areas. II. STATUTORY DEFINITION OF SLUM AND BLIGHT IN CHAPTER 163.340 Chapter 163.340 of the Florida Statute defines slum and blight as the following: "Slum Area" means an area in which there is a predominance of buildings or improvements, whether residential or nonresidential, which by reason of dilapidation, deterioration, age, or obsolescence; inadequate provision for ventilation, light, air, sanitation, or open spaces; high density of population and overcrowding; the existence of conditions which endanger life or property by fire or other causes; or any combination of such factors is conducive to III health, transmission of disease, infant mortality, juvenile delinquency, or crime and Is detrimental to the public health, safety, morals, or welfare. "Blighted Area" means either: (a) An area in which there a substantial number of slum, deteriorated, or deteriorating structures and conditions which endanger life or property by fire or other causes or one or more of the following factors which substantially impairs or arrests the sound growth of a county or municipality and is a menace to the public health, safety, morals, or welfare in its present condition and use: 1. Predominance of defective or inadequate street layout; 2. Faulty lot layout in relation to size, adequacy, accessibility, or usefulness; 3. Unsanitary or unsafe conditions; 4. Deterioration of site or other improvements 5. Tax or special assessment delinquency exceeding the fair value of the land; and 6. Diversity of ownership or defective or unusual conditions of title which prevent the free alienability of land within the deteriorated or hazardous area; or (b) An area in which there exists faulty or inadequate street layout; inadequate parking facilities; or roadways, bridges, or public transportation facilities incapable of handling the volume of traffic flow into or through the area, either at present or following proposed construction. The following sections detail the findings of blighted conditions in the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle and the Immokalee areas that justify making a finding of Necessity for blighted conditions as outlined in Chapter 163, Florida Statute: /-Y 14B 1 111. BAYSHOREJGATEWAY TRIANGLE REDEVELOPMENT AREA : -. M_ . .F.I&'i MEMUMIll u• - �- (a) An area in which there are a substantial number of slum, deteriorated or deteriorating structures and conditions which endanger life or property by fire or other causes or one or more of the following factors which substantially impairs or arrests the sound growth of a county or municipality and is a menace to the public health, safety, morals, or welfare in its present condition and use: 1. Predominance of defective or inadequate street layout; The Bayshore/Gateway Redevelopment Area is characterized by a defective or Inadequate street layout. These problems include: Inadequate street layout and design; Commercial parking problems; Lack of streetlights along major arterial and most local streets; Lack of sidewalks; and Lack of neighborhood connections. In the Bayshore/Gateway Redevelopment area there are three major collectors, Bayshore Road and Thomasson Drive and Shadowlawn Drive. The Collier County Land Development Code requires a minimum of 100 feet of right of way for collectors. Shadowlawn Drive bisects a residential community with an elementary school and several churches. It is located in the Gateway Triangle area and is a two- lane collector with 11 foot wide lanes. The right-of-way width of Shadowlawn Drive varies from 55 to 70 feet. Shadowlawn Drive does not have sidewalks or bike lanes and does not meet the 100' minimum right-of-way standard, Thomasson Drive is a two-lane facility. The roadway width is twenty feet which does not meet the County's standard of a twenty-two foot minimum width for collector roads. There are no sidewalks along Bayshore Road from Thomasson Road south to its terminous. The commercial areas are located on Davis Boulevard (SR 84), Airport Road, Bayshore Road and US 41. Davis Boulevard, Airport Road and US 41 are the area's major arterials. All are characterized by inadequate off-street parking and no available on -street parking. Along these early -established commercial corridors many businesses were constructed prior to the establishment of development standards for parking. The parking problem has worsened along Davis Boulevard and US 41 due to roadway widening from four to six lune facilities. On -street parking Is no longer available on Davis Boulevard and some of the parking area along US 41 was acquired for the recent road widening of that facility. In some cases, parking lots are oriented in such a way that vehicles must back out into traffic. Most of the commercial areas are not linked to one another so there are no shared parking opportunities. /l.2(C-) / /H 148 1 Davis Boulevard has no streetlights creating a compromised nighttime travel condition. There is very little nighttime pedestrian activity and some businesses have taken measures to secure their properties with bars on windows and chain link fences along the perimeter of their properties. The residential neighborhoods are not linked to one another. The typical local street width is 18 feet in the area. The County standard for local roads is 20 feet. There is no street lighting or sidewalks on most local streets. 2. Faulty lot layout in relation to size, adequacy, accessibility, or usefulness; The majority of land zoned for commercial development within this area is zoned General Commercial (C-4) and Heavy Commercial (C-5). Collier County Land Development Code requires a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet with a minimum width of 100 feet. Most of the commercial lots in the area do not meet the minimum size of width required for commercial development. The lots accessed off of US41and Davis Boulevard have been reduced in size as a result of road widening projects of these two arterials. The C-4 and C-5 zoning district requires a minimum front yard setback of 25 feet, a side yard setback of 15 feet; and a 15 feet rear yard set back. The majority of buildings are located on or near the lot line, with no buffer. in addition, the entire commercial lots located between Pine Street and US41 were platted years ago when minimum standards were not applied and do not conform to most of today's standards. The majority of the land zoned for residential development in the Gateway Triangle area is zoned Residential Multiple Family — 6 district (RMF -6). The area consists of 359 acres of which 125 acres are zoned residential. There are 402 residential dwelling units within this area. The actual residential density is far below the approved density for the area, with 1 unit per 3 aces developed instead of the 6 units per acre allowed. The average age of the housing stock is 45- 55 years old. The RMF -6 zoning district has a minimum requirement of 6500 square feet with a width of 60 feet for a single family development; 12,000 square feet with a width of 80 feet for a two-family development; and 5,500 square feet per unit with a width of 100 feet for a three or more family residential development. Most of the residential properties in these zoning districts do not meet the minimum width required for residential development. Some do not meet either of the width or lot square footage requirements. Some of the buildings are non -conforming with regards to required minimum lot width, size, and setbacks. In the Bayshore neighborhood there is a mixture of residential zoning. The majority is RMF -6 and Residential Single Famlly-4 district (RSF-4). There are also Mobile Home (MH) and Village Residential district (VR) zoning within the area. The Collier County Land Development Code requires a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet with a width of 70 feet for interior lots and 75 feet for corner lots for residential development in the RSF4 zoning district. The Collier County Land Development Code requires a minimum lot size of 6,000 square feet with a width of 60 feet for residential development in the VR and MH zoning districts. /51-, 14B 1 Most of the residential lots in these zoning districts do not meet the minimum width required for residential development. On average the lots in these areas are forty to fifty feet wide. Most of the buildings are non -conforming with regards to required minimum lot width, size, and setbacks. 3. Unsanitary or unsafe conditions: According to 1990 Census Data, 0.10 percent of Bayshore/Gateway Triangle area households lack complete plumbing for exclusive use. In the entire county, this figure is 0.02 percent. In occupied housing units across the county for 1990, only 0.03 percent of the units had more than 1.51 or more persons per room. This figure for the Bayshore/Gateway area is 3.0 percent, reflecting a greater degree of overcrowding in the area (1990 Census). In the Bayshore/Gateway study area, 2 unsafe structures identified from January 1998 to February 2000. Sidewalks and streetlights are almost absent from local streets within the redevelopment area. 4. Deterioration of site or other improvements: Most of the local roads are poorly drained. Properties and roads are frequently flooded. Surface water management problems are present within the entire Bayshore/Gateway study 0 area. These problems include localized flooding and direct discharge of stormwater run-off into Naples Bay. Significant and frequent flooding throughout the Gateway area is attributed to low elevations and inadequate stormwater management systems. Bayshore experiences the same problems. The entire Bayshore area, east of Bayshore Road , south of Haldemann Creek experiences the same significant and frequent flooding. South of Thomasson Drive, many of the local roads are unpaved and are poorly drained. 5. Tax or special assessment delinquency exceeding the fair value of the land: For purposes of this study, data is unavailable for this topic. 6. Diversity of ownership or defective or unusual conditions of title which prevent the free alienability of land within the deteriorated or hazardous area, For purposes of this study, data is unavailable for this topic. (b) An area in which there exists faulty or inadequate street layout; inadequate parking facilities or roadways, bridges or public transportation facilities incapable of handling the volume of traffic flow into or through the area, either at present or following proposed construction. The residential neighborhoods lack connection to one another. The current right of way along Shadowlawn Drive is inadequate to provide needed improvements and acquisition of additional right of way would negatively impact the community. 16 14B 1 The commercial lots lack adequate parking facilities, There is no public transportation provided within the study area. The local streets do not meet the County standards of right —of- way width, pavement width, or placement of sidewalks. "ou ina Affordability fas defined in Section 163 355 (8) F S j means: An area in which there is a shortage of housing affordable to residents of low or moderate income, including the elderly. There is a great demand in the County for affordable housing. According to the Florida Association of Realtors, the Naples MSA is the least affordable community in the State. In 1996, the median sales price for a single family home in the MSA was $180,000. In addition, only 31 % of all dwelling units sold in 1995 were under $99,000. While there are opportunities for obtaining affordable housing in the Bays hore/Gateway Traingie Redevelopment Area, the average 1999 sales price for a single family home was $108,267. The current trends predict that acquisition and rental prices will continue to rise, According to Kiplinger's Personal Finance it is projected that within the next ten years home values in Naples are expected to grow by 75.1 percent. CONCLUSION OF FINDINGS OF QLI It is the conclusion of this study that the Bays hore/Gateway Triangle study area clearly has a predominance of defective or inadequate street layout, faulty lot layout, unsafe or unsanitary conditions, and deterioration of a site or other improvements as set forth in Chapter 163 for designation as a blighted area and that rehabilitation, conservation, or redevelopment, or a combination thereof, of the Bays hore/Gateway study area is necessary and advisable in the furtherance of the public interest of residents of Collier County. /cpCCJ 17 14B 1 BAYSHORE/GATEWAY TRIANGLE REDEVELOPMENT AREA LEGAL DESCRIPTION BEG SW CNR SECT 2, TWP 50, RNG 25, N 630', E 662', S 427', E 200', N 270', E TO THE E RMI LINE OF BROOKSIDE DRIVE, S TO THE SW CNR OF LOT 10, SUNSET SUB, E TO THE SE CNR OF LOT 6, SUNSET SUB, S 92', E TO THE NW CRN OF LOT 55, BLK A, ROCK CREEK PARK, N TO THE NW CNR OF LOT 10, BLK B, ROCK CREEK PARK, E TO THE E SECT LINE SECT 2, TWP 50, RNG 25, S TO THE NW CNR OF SECT 12, TWP 50, RNG 25, E 670', S 773', W 200', S 735', W 200', S 990', E 460', S 330', E 972', S 1174', SWLY 481', NWLY 523', W 95', SWLY 730' TO THE NELY RNV LINE U.S. 41, CONT SWLY TO THE SWLY R/W LINE U.S. 41, NWLY ALG THE SWLY RNV LINE OF U.S. 41 TO ITS INTERSECT WITH THE W RNV LINE OF BAYSHORE DRIVE, S TO THE N RNV LINE OF WEEKS AVE, W 761', N 1355', W TO THE W RNV LINE OF PINE STREET, N TO THE SE CNR OF LOT 2, BLK K, INOMAH SUB, W 100', N TO THE N RNV OF WASHINGTON AVE, CONT NWLY AND WLY ALG NLY RNV LINE WASHINGTON AVE TO THE SW CNR OF LOT 2, BLK C, INOMAH SUB, W TO THE W RNV LINE OF FREDRICK ST, N TO NE CNR LOT 9, COC -LEE -TERRACE SUB, W TO THE W SECT UNE OF SECT 11, TWP 50, RNG 25, N TO THE SW SECT CNR OF SECT 2, TWP 50, RNG 25 AND THE POB. 50 BEG SE CNR SECT 23 AND TWP RNG 25 N ALG THE E $ECT LIMES OF SECT 23 AND 14 TWE 50 G 25, TO E 14 CN R E E TO THE SE GNR LQT 6. CREWS SUB N TO THE S LINE OF HALDEMAN CREEK E TO THE SWLY &W LINE OF U.S. 41 NWLY \- ALG THE SWLY RNV LINE OF U3. 41 TO ITS INTSECT WITH BAYSHORE, DRIVE S TO THE N RNV LINE OF WEEKS AVE W 761' N 1355' W To THE W R_NV LINE OF PINE STREET S TO THE S RNV LINE OF MANGROVE STREET W TO THE NW CNR LOT 14 BLK F HALDEMAN RIVER SUB S TO THE N LINE OF HALDEMAN CREEK SWLY ALG THE N LINE OF HALDEMAN CREEK TO ITS INTSECT WITH THE W SECT LINE OF SECT14 TWP 50 RNG 25 S ALG THE W SECT LINE OF SECT 14 AND 23 TWP 50 RNG 25 TO THE SW CNR OF SECT 23 TWP 50 RNG 25, E TO THE SE CNR OF SECT 23 TWP 50 /locCj 14B I BA YSIWRE / GA 7FWA Y MANGLE REDEVROMENT AREA Oil i 04 i 148 1 IV. IMMOKALEE REDEVELOPMENT AREA FINDINGS OF BLIGHT CONDITIONS 13liahted Area [as dafined in Section 163,340 (8) Florida Statutesl means either. (a) An area in which there are a substantial number of slum, deteriorated or deteriorating structures and conditions which endanger life or property by fire or other causes or one or more of the following factors which substantially impairs or arrests the sound growth of a county or municipality and is a menace to the public health, safety, morals, or welfare in its present condition and use: 1, Predominance of defective or inadequate street layout; The Immokalee Redevelopment Area is characterized by a defective or inadequate street layout. Most Immokalee residents walk or bicycle to work, school and shopping. Few adequate bicycle and pedestrian facilities are available throughout the Immokalee study area. Problems include: Inadequate street layout and design Lack of shoulders and guardrails along streets adjacent to deep and wide drainage swales Poor access to Commercial and Industrial parking and access problems Few sidewalks available for a predominately pedestrian population A general lack of neighborhood connections to each other The major arterial roadways are State Road 29, Immokalee Road and New Market Road (SR 29A). State Road 29 is a two-lane facility that widens to four lanes through the small downtown area. The four -lane segment is called Main Street and is the focus of redevelopment and economic revitalization. It is the only segment with on -street parking and sidewalks on both sides. The two lane segments of State Road 29 north and east of Main Street are two Lanes with no sidewalks. New Market Road is a two lane facility with 100 feet of right-of-way and no sidewalks, paved shoulders, or turn lanes. The remaining right-of-way and truck parking is limestone, Vegetable and fruit packing houses and the State Farmers Market are located along this street. Trucks are encouraged to use this street as a bypass road to avoid the downtown area and to pick up goods for transport. The roadway is in poor condition and maintenance costs are high due to damage by trucks dragging limestone on roadway. Although many people walk or bicycle to work in this area, pathway facilities are unavailable. Immokalee Road intersects with SR 29 at the beginning of Main Street. North of Main Street it narrows to two lanes and has a sidewalk on the west side only. Major problems exist along many of the local roads. There are few sidewalks. Typical local street widths are less than twenty feet required in the Collier County Land Development Code and open stormwater systems are adjacent to roadways without paved shoulders or guardrails. For example, south of State Road 29, along 9`" Street, there are deep, wide drainage ditches on both sides of the roadway. There are no sidewalks and no guardrails to safeguard pedestrians and motorists. The roadway width is eighteen feet and there is not enough right of .-17n 14B 1 way to construct pathway facilities without converting the open swales to a covered stormwater system, In addition, many residential neighborhoods are not linked to one another and most of the commercial areas are not linked to one another. The Immokalee Regional Airport and Industrial Park lacks adequate water and sewer service and stormwater management facilities to sufficiently handle the projected future development. County Road 846 that leads to Airpark Blvd. is a two-lane facility with narrow lanes and no paved shoulders. This facility does not adequately address the projected increase in truck traffic due to the future development of the airport and industrial park. 2, Faulty lot layout in relation to size, adequacy, accessibility, or usefulness; The majority of commercial lots are zoned General Commercial District (C-4) or Heavy Commercial District (C-5). In the C-4 and C-5 zoning district a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet, with a width of 100 feet for commercial development is required, Many of the commercial lots in these zoning districts do not meet the minimum width required for commercial development. Some do not meet either of the lot width or lot square footage requirements, Existing buildings are frequently non -conforming with regards to required minimum lot width, size, setbacks, and buffers, The RMF6 zoning district has a minimum requirement of 6500 square feet with a width of 60 feet for a single family development; 12,000 square feet with a width of 80 feet for a two-family development; and 5,500 square feet per unit with a width of 100 feet for a three or more family residential development. The majority of lots are non -conforming and rebuilding on these lots may require the owner to seek a variance from the development standards. In the South Immokalee area over 50% of the platted lots are non -conforming. The majority of these lots are zoned C-4 or RMF -6. A majority of the mobile home parks in the Immokalee community were developed in the 1970's and do not meet the minimum standards and permitted densities, The Collier County Land Development Code requires a minimum lot size of 6,000 square feet with a width of 60 feet for residential development in the VR and MH zoning districts. It is common in the Immokalee Community to have intensive commercial uses located adjacent to residential uses without adequate buffering between the uses. 3. Unsanitary or unsafe conditions; According to 1990 Census Data, 1.2 percent of Immokalee' area households lack complete plumbing for exclusive use. In the entire county, this figure is 0.2 percent. In occupied housing' units in Immokalee according to the 1990 U.S. Census, 6.8 percent of the owner occupied units and 16 percent of the renter occupied units had more than 1.51 or more persons per room. This figure is .03 for the entire County reflecting a greater degree of overcrowding in the Immokalee area, Based on the 1994 Immokalee Housing Study, there were a total of 4,957 housing units of those 1,282 or 26% are in need of rehabilitation. 14117 (C J 14B 1 In the Immokalee study area, 19 unsafe buildings and 4 unsecure structures were identified from January 1998 to February 2000. Sidewalks are almost entirely absent from the redevelopment area. There is a lack of street lighting in the most of the residential neighborhoods. Wide and deep open swales are present in the South Immokalee neighborhoods. They accumulate stagnate water and trash. The disposal of garbage in the Immokalee area is a problem. Lack of adequate dumpsters for the mobile home parks and commercial establishments results in a serious litter problem. The Immokalee Water and Sewer District covers approximately 27 square miles and most of the Urban area of Immokalee. However, the geographic area served by the district is considerably smaller. Additional treatment plants and distribution lines will be needed to serve the entire community. The Immokalee Water and Sewer District is under a consent order from the Department of Environmental Protection due to insufficient handling of their effluent. The sprayfields are inadequate. No new sewer hook-ups can be permitted unless the District can show a reduction of flow to the system. There are a few separate collection systems that were permitted prior to the creation of the district. Those systems need to be upgraded and included within the district's authority. An example is the Baker Street area which is on a separate collection system. There have been three reported failures since 1997 where raw sewage was deposited on the ground. 4, Deterioration of site or other improvements: Surface water management problems are present within the entire Immokalee study area. These problems include localized flooding in neighborhoods in the northeast section of the study area. Many local roads within the study area are poorly drained and experience flooding, as well. Some of the roads are unpaved and poorly drained. In South Immokalee where a high concentration of rental units and pedestrian traffic occurs the typical open drainage ditch is 4 feet deep and 15 feet wide. 5. Tax or special assessment delinquency exceeding the fair value of the land: For purposes of this study, data Is unavailable for this topic. 6. Diversity of ownership or defective or unusual conditions of title which prevent the free alienability of land within the deteriorated or hazardous area, For purposes of this study, data is unavailable for this topic. (b) An area in which there exists faulty or inadequate street layout; inadequate parking facilities or roadways, bridges or public transportation facilities incapable of handling the volume of traffic flow into or through the area, either at present or following proposed construction. The residential neighborhoods lack connection to one another. Ig (Gj 14B 1 In a primarily pedestrian community, there is a lack of an integrated sidewalk system connecting residential areas with commercial establishments, There is no public transportation system. The commercial lots along Main Street and First Street lack adequate parking facilities. New Market Road does not adequately address the needs of the semi -trucks and trailers that transport the farm products out of the area. Heavy truck traffic on local streets intrudes residential neighborhoods and has had a negative Impact on commercial redevelopment activities. SR 29 does not provide the number of lanes needed to adequately serve the Immokalee Regional Airport and Industrial Park. WM9..._ WE . - - . -luomme jll lig `'1 IM An area in which there is a shortage of housing affordable to residents of low or moderate income, including the elderly, A housing unit is considered affordable if the monthly payments do not exceed 35 percent of the monthly income for principal, interests, taxes, and insurance. According to the 1994 Immokalee Housing Study 36 percent of the households with a mortgage and 40 percent of renter occupied households pay more than 35 percent of their income for housing, According to the study of those persons making less than $10,000, 72 percent pay more than 35 percent of their income to rent. The median household income in 1990 according to the U.S. Census Bureau was $15,170. Forty- five percent of the population in Immokalee is below the poverty level. The population growth, as well as high seasonal farm labor population, has produced a critical demand for housing according to the 1999 Empowerment Alliance of Southwest Florida Strategic Plan. There is a shortage of low and moderate income housing in the Immokalee Community CONCLUSION OF FINDINGS OF BLIGHT It is the conclusion of this study that the Immokalee study area clearly has a predominance of defective or inadequate street layout, faulty lot layout, unsafe or unsanitary conditions, and deterioration of a site or other improvements as set forth in Chapter 163 for designation as a blighted area and that rehabilitation, conservation, or redevelopment, or a combination thereof, of the Immokalee study area is necessary and advisable in the furtherance of the public interest of residents of Collier County. '-1A cc S v� � 148 1 BEG AT THE NW CNR SEC 25, TWP 46, RNG 28, THENCE E ALG N LINE SEC 25 TO NE CRN OF SEC 25 AND THE NW CNR OF SEC 30, TWP 46 RNG 29, THENCE E ALG THE N LINES OF SECTONS 30, 29, 28, 27, AND 26 TO THE NW CNR OF SEC 25, TWP 46, RNG 29, THENCE S ALG THE W LINE SEC 25 TO THE NW CNR OF THE SW'/4 OF SW'/4 SEC 25, THENCE E TO THE NE CNR OF THE SW % OF SW '/4 SEC 25, THENCE S TO THE S SEC LINE OF SEC 25 AND THE NE CNR OF THE W %2 OF NW'/ OF SEC 36, TWP 46, RNG 29, THENCE S TO THE SE CNR OF THE W '/z OF NW '/4 SEC 36, THENCE W TO THE W '/4 CRN SECTON 36, THENCE S TO THE SW CNR SEC 36 AND THE NW CNR OF SEC 1, TWP 47, RNG 29, THENCE E TO THE NE CNR OF SEC 1 AND THE NW CNR OF SEC 6, TWP 47, RNG 30, THENCE E TO THE NE CNR OF SEC 6, THENCE S TO THE SE CNR OF SEC 6, THENCE W TO THE SW CNR OF SEC 6 AND THE SE CNR OF SEC 1, TWP 47, RNG 29, THENCE W TO THE S'/4 CNR SEC 1 AND THE N'/4 CNR OF SEC 12, TWP 47, RNG 29, THENCE S TO THE S'/4 CNR SEC 12 AND THE N'/ CNR OF SEC 13, TWP 47, RNG 29, THENCE S TO THE CENTER OF SEC 13, THENCE W TO THE W'/4 CNR SEC 13 AND THE E Y4 CNR OF SEC 14, TWP 47, RNG 29, CONT W TO THE W'/4 CNR OF SEC 14 AND THE El/. CNR OF SEC 15, TWP 47, RNG 29, THENCE S TO SE CNR OF SEC 15, THENCE W ALG THE S LINE OF SEC 15 AND 16 TO THE SW CNR OF SEC 16, TWP 47, RNG 29, THENCE N ALG THE W LINE OF SEC 16 AND 9 TO THE NW CNR OF SEC 9, TWP 47, RNG 29 AND THE SE CNR OF SEC 5, TWP 47, RNG 29, THENCE W ALG THE S LINE OF SEC 5 AND 6 TO THE SW CNR OF SEC 6, TWP 47, RNG 29, AND THE SE CNR OF SEC 1, TWP 47, RNG 28, THENCE N TO THE E'/ CNR OF SEC 1, THENCE W TO THE SHORELINE OF LAKE TRAFFORD, THENCE ALG THE SHORELINE OF LAKE TRAFFORD NELY, NLY, NWLY, WLY, SWLY TO THE INTERSECTON OF THE LAKE TRAFFORD SHORELINE AND THE W SEC LINE OF SEC 35, TWP 46, RNG 28, THENCE N TO THE NW CNR OF SEC 35, THENCE E TO THE NE CNR OF SEC 35 AND THE SW CNR OF SEC 25, TWP 46, RNG 28, THENCE N TO THE NW CNR OF SEC 25 AND THE P.O.B. /off (o l 12 Q W Q W m CL 09 .J Wu W0 Q u i W e �y u W W QJ Y 0 W d m W M N w W N m 14B 1 5 Lp 1 W d a S 9b 1 l S Lb 1 13 W m fu It 14B 1 12 C l RESOLUTION NO. 2000-83 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA RELATING TO COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT; DECLARING THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS TO BE THE COLLIER COUNTY COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY; AUTHORIZING THE CREATION OF ADVISORY BOARDS FOR THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AREA; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT WITH OTHER RESOLUTIONS AND SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has adopted a resolution finding the existence of one or more blighted areas In the unincorporated area of the County and further finding that the rehabilitation, conservation or redevelopment or combination thereof, in such areas is necessary in the interest of the public health, safety, morals or welfare of the residents of Collier County, Florida; and WHEREAS, to carry out and Implement the redevelopment powers and actions contemplated by Part III, Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, within such areas, it Is necessary that a community redevelopment agency be created; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners desires to serve as the community redevelopment agency and have advisory boards consisting of citizens and property owners in the areas providing advice to the Board concerning the redevelopment of the areas; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Findinas. The foregoing recitals are hereby adopted and incorporated herein to the same extent as if they were set forth In this section. Section 2. Declaration of Board of Qounty Commissioners as Community RedeyelopmentAgencv. As provided in Section 163.357(1), Florida Statutes (1999), the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, does hereby declare itself to be the Collier County Community Redevelopment Agency as an additional duty of office, and does further declare that all the rights, powers, duties, privileges, and Immunities vested by Part Ili, Chapter 163, Florida Statutes (1999) in such a community redevelopment agency are hereby vested In the Board of County Commissioners, subject to all responsibilities and liabilities imposed or incurred, Section 2. Separate Leaai Entltv, The members of the Board of County Commissloners are the members of the Community Redevelopment Agency, but the members constitute the head of a legal entity, separate, distinct, and independent from the Board of County Commissioners. Section 3. Creation of Advisory Boprds. There are to be created, under separate resolutions by the Community Redevelopment Agency, advisory boards for each component 12 C l area of the community redevelopment area in the unincorporated area of Collier County, which shall be composed of citizens, residents, property owners and business owners or persons engaged in business In the area, as provided in the resolution of the Community Redevelopment Agency providing for the appointment of such members. The duties and responsibilities of such advisory boards shall be set forth in the resolution of the Community Redevelopment Agency. Section 4. Conflicts, All resolutions and parts of resolutions in conflict with any of the provisions of this resolution are hereby repealed. Sectlon 5. Severability. If any section or portion of a section of this resolution proves to be invalid, unlawful, or unconstitutional, it shall not be held to Invalidate or impair the validity, force, or effect of any other section or part of this resolution, Section B. Effective Date. This resolution shall become effective immediately upon Its passage and adoption. Section 7. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote this 1 LI -9 day of 2000. ATTEST; BOARD OF C SIONERS 'DWIGHT -A. BROCK, CLERK COLLIER LINTY, FLORIDA t.. ( BY; �+ TIM0T CONSTA NE, C IRMAN '-Att0t at _to Chairman's V f gnaturle' only. APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY David C. Weigel County Attorney 2 14B 1 • 120 1 Resolution No. 2000-181 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, RELATING TO COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT; MAKING FINDINGS; ADOPTING A COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT PLAN; AUTHORIZING IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PLAN; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the County Commisslon adopted Resolutlon 2000-82 on March 14, 2000, finding the existence of blight conditions in two areas in the unincorporated area of Collier County, as more particularly described in that resolution (such area being referred to herein as the 'Community Redevelopment Area`); and WHEREAS, a Community Redevelopment Plan as contemplated by Part III, Chapter 163, Florida Statutes (1999), has been prepared which addresses the redevelopment needs in the Community Redevelopment Area; and WHEREAS, on May 18, 2000, the County's Planning Commission, as the County's Local Planning Agency for purposes of the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act, determined the proposed community redevelopment plan is In conformity with the County's comprehensive plan for the County as a whole and recommended the County Commission approve the proposed plan; and WHEREAS, the Community Redevelopment Agency on May 23, 2000 approved the proposed community redevelopment plan and recommended it to the County Commission; and WHEREAS, a copy of the proposed community redevelopment plan was submitted by the Community Redevelopment Agency to the County Commission, as the governing body of Collier County, Florida, and to Big Corkscrew Fire District; East Naples Fire District; immokales Fire District; Collier County Board of County Commissioners; and the Collier County Mosquito Control District, as taxing authorities which levy ad valorem taxes on taxable real property contained within the geographic boundaries of the Community Redevelopment Area; and WHEREAS, the notices required by Section 183.348, Florida Statutes (1999), have been published and mailed as required therein, and a public hearing regarding the proposed community redevelopment plan was held. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AS FOLLOWS: 146 1 12C 1 SECTION 1, incorporating Regjtls. The Board of County Commissioners finds, declares and determines that the matters set forth in the foregoing recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein as a part of this Resolution. �ECTIQN 2, Finding of Conformance with Oomprgh2nsive Plan. The County Commission hereby finds, determines and declares that the proposed community redevelopment plan for the Community Redevelopment Area attached hereto as Exhibit "A" (the "Community Redevelopment Plank conforms to the general comprehensive plan of Collier County as a whole. SECTION 3. Finding of Adeouacy gf Recreational Facllitles. The County Commission hereby finds, determines and declares that the Community Redevelopment Plan gives due consideration to the provision of adequate park and recreational areas and facilities that are desirable for neighborhood improvement, with special consideration for the health, safety, and welfare of children residing in the general vicinity of the are covered by the plan. SECTION 4, Finding of Relocation. The County Commission finds that a feasible method for the relocation of families who will be displaced from the community redevelopment area In decent, safe, and sanitary dwelling accommodations within their means and without undue hardship to such families Is contained In the Community Redevelopment Plan, , ECjtON 5, Finding of Maximum Qpportunity. The County Commission hereby finds that although the Community Redevelopment Plan contemplates most Improvements will be undertaken by the County or the CRA, the Community Redevelopment Plan will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the County as a whole, for the rehabilitation or redevelopment of the community redevelopment area by private enterprise to the extent contemplated by said plan. SECTION 6, Adoption of Community Redevelopment Plan. The County Commission does hereby adopt the Community Redevelopment Plan as the community redevelopment plan for the Community Redevelopment Area and authorizes and directs the Community Redevelopment Agency to proceed with the Implementation of the plan, SECTIQN 7, Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon approval by the County Commission, ra r 12C 1 SECTION a. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote this _L3_ day ofT, 2000, ATTE&: DWIGHT C. BROOK, CLERK 'Attest -as to Chrtdrvw Is styaitureo+�lr: BOARD OF TY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER OUNTY, FLORIDA y BY: TIMOT CONSTA INE, CHAIRMAN APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY David C. Weigel County Attorney RESOLUTION NO. 2004 - 179 17F A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, FINDING A BLIGHTED AREA TO EXIST AND EXPANDING THE BOUNDARIES OF THE IMMOKALEE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AREA. WHEREAS, on March 14, 2000, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida (Board) adopted Resolution No. 2000-82, finding a specified area of Immokalee to be blighted and creating the Immokalee Community Redevelopment Area; and WHEREAS, on March 26, 2004, the Immokalee Local Redevelopment Advisory Board met and recommended expansion of the boundaries of the Immokalee Community Redevelopment Area (Area), as set forth in Exhibit A (Expanded Area); and WHEREAS, on April 13, 2004, the Board received and considered a report and presentation by County staff identifying current economic conditions and considered the applicability of various economic incentives within this Expanded Area; and WHEREAS, after having considered the determinations and the facts and evidence of conditions in the Expanded Area and having received and considered such other evidence of the conditions in the Expanded Area presented to it, the Board now desires to proceed in accordance with the authorization and powers granted by Part III, Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, to establish the necessary means by which redevelopment can be accomplished in the Expanded Area and that certain actions are appropriate and necessary and should be taken to address the conditions now present and expected to be present in the Expanded Area. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Findings. The Board of County Commissioners, consistent with § 163.355, Fla. Stat. (2003), does hereby find: (a) Based upon the facts and evidence presented to and considered by the Board that the following conditions exist in the Expanded Area proposed to be added to the existing Immokalee Community Redevelopment Area: 1. Past conditions continue to be present in the Expanded Area that are Page t of 3 14B 1 detrimental to the sound growth of the County and which substantially impair or arrest the growth within the Expanded Area, and present conditions and uses In the Expanded Area are detrimental to the public health, safety, morals and public welfare; and 2, There is a faulty and inadequate lot layout in relation to size, adequacy, accessibility, or usefulness in the Expanded Area; and 3. The aggregate assessed values of real property In the Expanded Area for ad valorem tax purposes have failed to show any appreciable increase over the past five years; and 4. There are inadequate and outdated building density patterns in the Expanded Area; and 5. There are unsanitary and unsafe conditions in the Expanded Area; and 6. There has been a deterioration of site and other improvements in the Expanded Area. (b) The notices required by Section 163.346 and Section 163.361 (3), Florida Statutes (2003), have been timely published or mailed in accordance with said statutes. (c) Action must be to+ken immediately to prevent further blight and deterioration and to protect and enhance public expenditures previously made In the Expanded Area. 4 Section 2. Findlna of Necessity. The Board of County Commissioners, based upon the evidence presented to It and in the public record with respect to the conditions found In Section 1 (a), above, finds that a "blighted area" as defined in Section 183.340 (8), Florida Statutes, exists wlthin the boundaries of Collier County in the area identified, described, and depicted on Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part of this Resolution (the Expanded Area), and further finds that the rehabilitation, conservation, or redevelopment, or a combination thereof, of such Expanded Area described is necessary in the Interest of the public health, safety, morals or welfare of the residents of Collier County, Florida. Section 3. C,ommunity Redevelopment Area. Based upon the facts presented and contained in the public record, the Board of County Commissioners finds the Expanded Area constitutes a "community redevelopment area" as defined in Section 163.340 (10), Florida Statutes (2003), and hereby adds the Expanded Area to the Immokatee Community Redevelopment Area, Section 4. Conflicts. All resolutions and parts of resolutions In conflict with any Page 2 of 3 14B 1 1 7F of the provisions of this resolution are hereby repealed, provided, however, nothing herein is intended nor should be applied to affect, repeal, alter, amend or supersede any previous resolutions adopted by the Board of County Commissioners finding any other area or areas within Collier County to be a "blighted area" for purposes of the Community Redevelopment Act, specifically including Resolution 2003-82. Section 6. Sgverability. If any section or portion of a section of this Resolution, Including any part of Exhibit A, proves to be invalid, unlawful, or unconstitutional, it shall not be held to invalidate or Impair the validity, force, or effect of any other section or part of this resolution. Should any area constituting part of the Expanded Area be severed from the Expanded Area by a court of competent Jurisdiction, the remainder shall constitute part of the Immokalee Community Redevelopment Area for purposes of this Resolution. Section 6. Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective Immediately upon adoption. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote this day of .2004. ATTESTt'-, � ; DWL(%AT E: B*LCK, CI BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER r �- By°�.�C. OUNTY, FLORIDA Atte.- IVa . iV ChiR I By' si9naY s. +ARIY� boNIN-A FIALA, Chairman Ap oved ' � -to forma d legal sufficiency: Patrick Z. White Assistant County Attorney Ifan I# 22e If l Page 3 of 3 A28E EXHIBIT A ?F (Sheet 1 of 2) Existing & Proposed Community Redevelopment Area R22 14B 1 R5*E 6*11 p P.Oo d pYYT + .b 0.0 Exhibit A yt _ • "`_'� \\' M... b b. Add.d b Corft KW.»kpnw'd An. mra�r.ra►..,w—,�yd,r,.+w�^-�.w.. .r YLIY�.iil::� 6*11 p P.Oo d pYYT + .b 0.0 Exhibit A yt _ • "`_'� \\' M... b b. Add.d b Corft KW.»kpnw'd An. mra�r.ra►..,w—,�yd,r,.+w�^-�.w.. .r 146 1 1?F :: EXHIBIT A (Sheet 2 ort) Description of the Expanded Areas of the Immokal ee Community Redevelopment Area (Area) In addition to the area described in Exhibit A of Resolution 2000-82, the Immokalee Community Redevelopment Area shall be expanded to include the following areas: Township 46 South, Range 28 East, Sections 26, 27, 34 and that portion of Section 35 not already included in the Area; Township 47 South, Range 28 East, the northern halves of Sections 2 and 3; Township 47 South, Range 29 East, Sections 7 and 8; Township 46 South, Range 30 East, Sections 30 and 3 1; and Township 46 South, Range 29 East, those portions of Sections 25 and 36 not already included in the Area. ., u, w+i +++� +v. c.., c,» r r tinti va 1T111vU i c.7 HIV(1 KGl.VK115 A RESOLUTION NO, 2004 -.384 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, FINDING A BLIGHTED AREA 'TO EXIST, AND EXPANDING THE BOUNDARIES OF THE IMMOKALEE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AREA. WHEREAS, on March 14, 2000, the Board if County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida (Board) adopted Resolution No. 2000.82, finding a speoliied area of Immokalae to be bllghted and creating the Immokaiee Community Redevelopment Area (Area); and WHEREAS, on May 25, 2004, finding adjacent portions of the Immokalae Community Redevelopment Area to be blighted, the Board Adopted Resolution No. 2004-179, expanding the boundaries of the Area; and WHEREAS, on October 27, 2004, the Immokalae Local Redevelopment Advisory Board met and recommended further expansion of the boundaries of the Immokelee Community Redevelopment Area, ea set forth in Exhibit A (Expanded Area); and WHEREAS, on December 14, 2004, the Community Redevelopment Area Board received and considered a report and presentation by County staff identifying current r economic Conditions within thls Expanded Area; and WHEREAS, after having considered the determinations and the facts and evidence of conditions in the Expanded Area and having received and considered such other evidence of the conditions in the Expanded Area presented to h, the Board now desires to proceed In accordance with the authorization and powers granted by Part III, Chapter 183, Florida Statutes, to establish the necessary means by which redevelopment can be accomplished in the Expended Area and that certain actions are approprtate and necessary and should be taken to address the conditions now present and expected la be present in the Expanded Area, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1, Findings, The Board of County Commissioners, consistent with § 163.355, Fla. Stat. (2003), does hereby find: (a) (dared upon the facts and evidence presented to and considered by the Page 1 of 3 14B 1 raft Vb /1 j� ® 4 Board that the following condltions exist In the Expanded Area proposed to be added to the existing tmmokalee Community Redevelopment Area; 1. Pasi oondltlons continue to be present in the Expanded Area that are detnrnentel to the sound growth of the County and which substantially Impair or arrest the growth within the Expanded Area, and present conditions and uses In the Expanded Area are detrimental to the public health, safety, morals and public welfare; and 2. There is a faulty and inadequate lot layout in rotation to size, adequacy, accessibility, or uaefutness to the Expanded Area; and 3. The aggregate assessed values of real property in the Expanded Area for ed valorem tax purposes have faded to show any appreciable increase over the -past five years; and 4. There are inadequate and outdated buliding density patterns in the Expanded Area; and 6. There are unsanitary and unsafe conditions In the Expanded Area, (b) The notices required by Section 163.346 and Section 163.361 (3), Florida Statutes (2003), have been timely published or mailed in accordance with said statutes. (c} Action must be taken immediately to prevent further blight and deterioration and to protect and entrance public expenditures previously made in the Expanded Area. section 2. Finding of N_ecanity. The Board of County Commissioners, basad upon the evidence prevented to it and in the public record with respect to the conditions found in Section 1 (a), above, finds that a "blighted area" as defined In Section 163.340 (8), Florida Statutes, exists within the boundaries or Collier County In the area identified, described, and depicted on Exhibits A and B, attached hereto end made a part of this Resolution (the Expanded Area), and further finds that the rehabilitation, conservation, or redevelopment, or a combination thereof, of such Expanded Area described is necessary in the Interest of the public health, safoty, morals or welfare of the resldents of Collier County, Florida, Section 3. gofnmunity Redaveto Rmg t Ar--. Based upon the facts presented and contained in the public record, the Board of County Commissioners finds the Expanded Area constllules a `cammuntty redevelopment area" as defined in Section 163.340 (10). Florida Statutes (2003), and hereby adds the Expanded Area to the Immokalee Community Redevelopment Area. Page 2 of 3 Itl/1Ul(LVVJ lu. LJ LJJ! fYOM VO 1,1IVVIGJ HIV3J fCGGUR V.'? 14B 8 A Section 4. Confllcls, All resolutions and parts of resolutions In conflict with any of the provisions of this rasolutlon are hereby repealed, provided, however, nothing herein Is Intended nor should be applied to affect, repeal• oiler, amend or supersede any previous resolutions adopted by the Board of County Commissioners finding any other area or areas within Collier County to be a "blighted area" for purposes of the Community Redevelopment Act, specifically Including Resolution 2000.92, Section 5. Severability. If any section or portion of a section of this Resolution, Including any part of t xhibit$ A and B, proves to be invalid, unlawful, or unconstitutional, it shall not be hold to invalidate or Impair the validity, force. or effect of any other section or part of this resoiution. Should any eras constituting part of the Expanded Area be severed from the Expanded Area by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder shall conatifute part of the Immokalea Communlly Redevelopment Area for purposes of this Resolution, Section 6. Effactive pal @• This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon adoption. This asoiutlon adopted after motion, second ane majority vote this -2�ay of ! d 6rn?),(� / _, 2004. ATTEST; , S0(1hp BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWIG6CK. eck OF COLLIER OUNTY, FLORIDA e = DONNA PIALA, Chairman QCpprovjo� �{t'td legal sufflclency: Assistant County Attorney X1; Date i DOW Rbc0 Pape 3 of 3 ., •' L,,,SUlI<nr�� 1b: L7 L.�y174d4b6 i miNUiE.5 AND REGUKDS p Nn Nip M'p �h e a, n N J �1 �'•,I Qr-+ Y n n Y N 'I ji'll di ry p r - f,r y� .~� a 7. NY p e a, n N J �1 �'•,I Qr-+ Y n n Y N 'I 14B I •oL_601/2005 16:25 2397748408 MINUTES AND RECORDS PAGE 10 EXHIBIT B Description of the_nAnd� Areas of the Itxirnakttlee CgmrxtunitY Redevelopment Area in addition to the area described in Exhibit R of Resolution 2000-82, the Inamokalee Community Redevelopment Area shall be expanded to inolude the following areas: The southern halves of Sections 2 and 3, 'Township 47 South, Range 28 East; and the portions not already included in the Redevelopment Area of Sections 12, 13, and 14, Township 47 South, Range 29 East, Commission of Collier County, Florida (the "County Commission") on March 14, 2000, it was determined that one or more blighted areas exist within Collier County, Florida, and that the rehabilitation, conservation or redevelopment, or a combination thereof, of such area is necessary in the interest of the public health, safety, morals or welfare of the residents of Collier County; and WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 2000-83 adopted by the County Commission on March 14, 2000, the County Commission created the Community Redevelopment Agency of Collier County, Florida (the "Agency"); and WHEREAS, by Resolution No, 2000—adopted by the County Commission on June 13, 2000, the County Commission adopted a community I ORDINANCE NO. ,0-U-42 to AN ORDINANCE OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, ESTABLISHING A eB499vt � REDEVELOPMENT TRUST FUND; PROVIDING FOR THE FUNDING OF A REDEVELOPMENT TRUST FUND FOR COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AREA; PROVIDING FOR ADMINISTRATION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT TRUST FUND; DETERMINING THE TAX INCREMENT TO BE DEPOSITED IN THE REDEVELOPMENT TRUST FUND; ESTABLISHING THE BASE YEAR FOR DETERMINING ASSESSED VALUES OF PROPERTY IN THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AREA FOR TAX INCREMENT PURPOSES; PROVIDING FOR THE ANNUAL APPROPRIATION OF THE TAX INCREMENT BY TAXING AUTHORITIES IN THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AREA; APPOINTING THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AS THE TRUSTEE OF THE REDEVELOPMENT TRUST FUND; EXEMPTING CERTAIN SPECIAL DISTRICTS FROM THE ANNUAL REQUIREMENT TO APPROPRIATE INCREMENT REVENUES TO THE REDEVELOPMENT TRUST FUND AND yC r^, AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE r M `cam — t PREPARATION OF AN INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT IMPLEMENTING EACH SUCH EXEMPTION; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE M DATE. n �+ry (-n WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 2000-82 adopted by tt9, ;Co*gty Commission of Collier County, Florida (the "County Commission") on March 14, 2000, it was determined that one or more blighted areas exist within Collier County, Florida, and that the rehabilitation, conservation or redevelopment, or a combination thereof, of such area is necessary in the interest of the public health, safety, morals or welfare of the residents of Collier County; and WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 2000-83 adopted by the County Commission on March 14, 2000, the County Commission created the Community Redevelopment Agency of Collier County, Florida (the "Agency"); and WHEREAS, by Resolution No, 2000—adopted by the County Commission on June 13, 2000, the County Commission adopted a community I 14B 1 redevelopment plan (the "Plan") for the community redevelopment area as fully described in that Resolution and In Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof (the "Community Redevelopment Area"); and WHEREAS, in order to plan and implement community redevelopment within the Community Redevelopment Area it Is necessary that a redevelopment trust fund be established and created for said area as provided in Section 163.387, Florida Statutes (1999) (the "Act"); and WHEREAS, it is appropriate and reasonable for certain special taxing districts to be exempted from the requirement to make an annual appropriation of "Increment revenues" to the redevelopment trust fund being created by this ordinance; and WHEREAS, notice of the County Commission's Intention to create a redevelopment trust fund has been published In a local newspaper of general circulation and mailed to all "taxing authorities" (as hereinafter defined) in accordance with Section 163.346, Florida Statutes (1999); NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ENACTED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA: SECTION 1. There is hereby established and created, in accordance with the provisions of the Act, a Community Redevelopment Trust Fund (the "Fund") for the Community Redevelopment Area, which fund shall be utilized and expended for the purposes of and In accordance with the Plan, including any amendments or modifications thereto, including any "community redevelopment," as that term Is defined In Section 163.340(9), Florida Statutes (1999), under the Plan. SECTION 2. The monies to be allocated to and deposited Into the Fund shall be used to finance "community redevelopment" within the Area according to tax Increment revenues attributed to the Area, which shall be appropriated by the Agency. The Agency Shall utilize the funds and revenues paid Into and eamed by the Fund for community redevelopment purposes as provided In the Plan and as permitted by law. The Fund shall exist for the duration of the "community redevelopment" undertaken by the Agency pursuant to the Plan to the extent permitted by the Act. Monies shall be held M In the Fund by Collier County, for and on behalf of the Agency, and disbursed from the Fund as provided by the Agency. SECTION 3. There shall be paid Into the Fund each year by each of the "taxing authorities," as that term is defined in Section 163.340(2), Florida Statutes (1999) except for those special districts exempted from such requirement, levying ad valorem taxes within the Community Redevelopment Area, a sum equal to ninety-five percent (95%) of the Incremental Increase in ad valorem taxes levied each year by that taxing authority, as calculated in accordance with Section 5 of this Ordinance and the Act, based on the base tax year established in Section 4 of this Ordinance (such annual sum being hereinafter referred to as the "fax Increment"). SECTION 4. The most recent assessment roll used in connection with the taxation of property prior to the effective date of this Ordinance shall be the assessment roll of taxable real property In Collier County, Florida, prepared by the Property Appraiser of Collier County, Florida, and certified pursuant to Section 193.122, Florida Statues (1999) reflecting valuation of real property for purposes of ad valorem taxation as of January 1, 1999 (the "base year value"), and all deposits Into the Fund shall be in the amount of tax increment calculated as provided in Section 5 hereof based upon increases in valuation of taxable real property from the base year value as reflected on the preliminary assessment roll of taxable real property In the community redevelopment area In the unincorporated area In collier County, Florida, prepared by the Property Appraiser of Collier County, Florida, filed with the Department of Revenue pursuant to Section 193.1142, Florida Statutes (1999). SECTION 5. The tax Increment shall be determined and appropriated annually by each taxing authority, and shall be an amount equal to ninety-five percent (95%) of the difference between: (a) That amount of ad valorem taxes levied each year by all taxing authorities on taxable real property located within the geographic boundaries of the Community Redevelopment Area; and (b) That amount of ad valorem taxes which would have been produced by the rate upon which the tax is levied each year by or for all taxing authorities, upon the total of the assessed value of the taxable real property in the Community Redevelopment Area as shown upon the 3 i assessment roll used in connection with the taxation of such property by all taxing authorities, prior to the effective date of this Ordinance. SECTION 6. All taxing authorities shall annually appropriate to and cause to be deposited in the Fund the tax Increment determined pursuant to the Act and Section 5 of this Ordinance at the beginning of each fiscal year thereof as provided in the Act. The obligation of each taxing authority to annually appropriate the tax Increment for deposit in the Fund shall commence immediately upon the effective date of this Ordinance and continue to the extent permitted by the Act so long as any Indebtedness pledging "increment revenue" is to be paid and so long as the Plan is In effect. SECTION 7. The fund shall be established and maintained as a separate trust fund by the Agency so that the Fund may be promptly and effectively administered and utilized by the Agency expeditiously and without undue delay for its statutory purpose pursuant to the Pian. SECTION 8. The governing body of the Agency shall be the trustees of the Fund and shall be responsible for the recelpt, custody, disbursement, accountability, management, investment and proper application of all monies paid Into the Fund. SECTION 9. Pursuant to Section 163.387(2)(d), Florida Statutes (1999), the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, as the governing body of Collier County, Florida, does hereby exempt the following special districts from the annual requirement to appropriate "increment revenues" and cause that amount to be deposited In the community redevelopment trust fund created by this ordinance: East Naples Fire District; Collier County Mosquito Control District; Big Corkscrew Fire District; and Immokalee Fire District. The appropriate County officials and consultants and advisors to the County and the CRA are hereby authorized and directed to prepare in conjunction with each such special district an interlocal agreement establishing the conditions of the exemption, including the period of time for which the exemption Is granted. SECTION 10. Any and all ordinances or resolutions or parts of ordinances or resolutions In confilct herewith are hereby repeated. 4 SECTION 11. If any part of this Ordinance Is held to be Invalid or unenforceable for any reason, such holding shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the remainder of this Ordinance, which shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 12. The Clerk of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, Is hereby authorized and directed to send a certified copy of this Ordinance to each of the taxing authorities and to the Property Appraiser of Collier County, Florida. SECTION 13. This Ordinance shall take effect Immediately upon Its passage and adoption, PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County the 13 day of June, 2000. `ATTEST: ;., ', DWIGHT C. •BRQCK, CLERK r Att4i! Asa C�iainsan's :f9Agtnre oaly. BOARD OF CO TONERS COLLIER C TY, FLORIDA BY; r TIMOT J ONSTA C H APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY David C. Weigel County Attorney M This ordinance flied with the Sec� etary of tote's Office the 1i day of >, -QLOQD and acknowledgement of that fl!npIrecelved this &A day I —awlBy DOPL"y WOE 148 1 EXHIBIT A BAYSHOREIGATEWAY TRIANGLE REDEVELOPMENT AREA DESCRIPTION BEG SW CNR SECT 2, TWP 50, RNG 25, N 630', E 662', S 427', E 200', N 270', E TO THE E R/W LINE OF BROOKSIDE DRIVE, S TO THE SW CNR OF LOT 10, SUNSET SUB, E TO THE SE CNR OF LOT 6, SUNSET SUB, S 92', E TO THE NW CRN OF LOT 55, BLK A, ROCK CREEK PARK, N TO THE NW CNR OF LOT 10, BLK B, ROCK CREEK PARK, E TO THE E SECT LINE SECT 2, TWP 50, RNG 25, S TO THE NW CNR OF SECT 12, TWP 50, RNG 25, E 670', S 773', W 200', S 735', W 200', S 990', E 460', S 330', E 972', S 1174', SWLY 481', NWLY 523', W 95', SWLY 730' TO THE NELY RNV LINE U.S. 41, CONT SWLY TO THE SWLY RNV LINE U.S. 41, NWLY ALG THE SWLY R/W LINE OF U.S. 41 TO ITS INTERSECT WITH THE W R/W LINE OF BAYSHORE DRIVE, S TO THE N RNV LINE OF WEEKS AVE, W 761', N 1355', W TO THE W R/W LINE OF PINE STREET, N TO THE SE CNR OF LOT 2, BLK K, INOMAH SUB, W 100', N TO THE N RNV OF WASHINGTON AVE, CONT NWLY AND WLY ALG NLY R/W LINE WASHINGTON AVE TO THE SW CNR OF LOT 2, BLK C, INOMAH SUB, W TO THE W R/W LINE OF FREDRICK ST, N TO NE CNR LOT 9, COC -LEE -TERRACE SUB, W TO THE W SECT LINE OF SECT 11, TWP 50, RNG 25, N TO THE SW SECT CNR OF SECT 2, TWP 50, RNG 25 AND THE POB. AND BEG SE CNR SECT 23, TWP 50, RNG 25, N ALG THE E SECT LINES OF SECT 23 AND 14, TWP 50, RNG 25, TO E YA CNR SECT14, TWP 50, RNG 25, E TO THE SE CNR LOT 6, CREWS SUB, N TO THE S LINE OF HALDEMAN CREEK, E TO THE SWLY RNV LINE OF U.S. 41, NWLY ALG THE SWLY RNV LINE OF U.S. 41 TO ITS INTSECT WITH THE W RNV LINE OF BAYSHORE DRIVE, S TO.THE N RNV LINE OF WEEKS AVE, W 761', N 1355', W TO THE W RNV LINE OF PINE STREET, S TO THE S RNV LINE OF MANGROVE STREET, W TO THE NW CNR LOT 14, BLK F, HALDEMAN RIVER SUB, S TO THE N LINE OF HALDEMAN CREEK, SWLY ALG THE N LINE OF HALDEMAN CREEK TO ITS INTSECT WITH THE W SECT LINE OF SECT 14, TWP 50, RNG 25, S ALG THE W SECT LINE OF SECT 14 AND 23, TWP 50, RNG 25, TO THE SW CNR OF SECT 23, TWP 50, RNG 25, E TO THE SE CNR OF SECT 23, TWP 50, RNG 25 AND THE POB, 148 1 M YSIM / M NWA Y MMARE RMEMaW NT AREA 148 1 BEG AT THE NW CNR SEC 25, TWP 46, RNG 28, THENCE: E ALG N LINE SEC 25 TO NE CRN OF SEC 25 AND THE NW CNR OF SEC 30, TWP 46 RNG 29, THENCE E ALG THE N LINES OF SECTONS 30, 29, 28, 27, AND 26 TO THE NW CNR OF SEC 25, TWP 46, RNG 29, THENCE S ALG THE W LINE SEC 25 TO THE NW CNR OF THE SW `/, OF SW % SEC 25, THENCE E TO THE NE CNR OF THE SW'/, OF SW Y, SEC 25, THENCE S TO THE S SEC LINE OF SEC 25 AND THE NE CNR OF THE W % OF NW 1/4 OF SEC 36, TWP 46, RNG 29, THENCE S TO THE SE CNR OF THE W'/s OF NW '% SEC 36, THENCE W TO THE W % CRN SECTON 36, THENCE S TO THE SW CNR SEC 36 AND THE NW CNR OF SEC 1, TWP 47, RNG 29, THENCE E TO THE NE CNR OF SEC 1 AND THE NW CNR OF SEC 6, TWP 47, RNG 30, THENCE E TO THE NE CNR OF SEC 6, THENCE S TO THE SE CNR OF SEC 6, THENCE W TO THE SW CNR OF SEC 6 AND THE SE CNR OF SEC 1, TWP 47, RNG 29, THENCE W TO THE S'A CNR SEC 1 AND THE N '/4 CNR OF SEC 12, TWP 47, RNG 29, THENCE S TO THE S''/, CNR SEC 12 AND THE N'/. CNR OF SEC 13, TWP 47, RNG 29, THENCE S TO THE CENTER OF SEC 13, THENCE W TO THE W'% CNR SEC 13 AND THE E % CNR OF SEC 14, TWP 47, RNG 29, CONT W TO THE W % CNR OF SEC 14 AND THE E Y. CNR OF SEC 15, TWP 47, RNG 29, THENCE S TO SE CNR OF SEC 15, THENCE W ALG THE S LINE OF SEC 15 AND 16 TO THE SW CNR OF SEC 16, TWP 47, RNG 29, THENCE N ALG THE W LINE OF SEC 16 AND 9 TO THE NW CNR OF SEC 9, TWP 47, RNG 29 AND THE SE CNR OF SEC 6, TWP 47, RNG 29, THENCE W ALG THE S LINE OF SEC 5 AND 6 TO THE SW CNR OF SEC 6, TWP 47, RNG 29, AND THE SE CNR OF SEC 1, TWP 47, RNG 28, THENCE N TO THE E % CNR OF SEC 1, THENCE W TO THE SHORELINE OF LAKE TRAFFORD, THENCE ALO THE SHORELINE OF LAKE TRAFFORD NELY, NLY, NWLY, WLY, SWLY TO THE INTERSECTON OF THE LAKE TRAFFORD SHORELINE AND THE W SEC LINE OF SEC 35, TWP 46, RNG 25, THENCE N TO THE NW CNR OF SEC 35, THENCE E TO THE NE CNR OF SEC 35 AND THE SW CNR OF SEC 25, TWP 46, RNG 28, THENCE N TO THE NW CNR OF SEC 25 AND THE P.O.B. Z W 2 CL 0 J W O W ce W W JQ Y 0 it 146 1 STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF COLLIER) I, DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk of Courts in and for the Twentieth Judicial Circuit, Collier County, Florida, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of: ORDINANCE NO. 2000-42 rQ o Which was adopted by the Board of County Commissions vn ..-� � rte: .o '��• the 13th day of June, 2000, during Regular Session. "I _n WITNESS my hand and the official seal of the Board County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this 14t: day of June, 2000. DWIGHT E. BROCK Clerk of Courts',and- Cle k%,:,,! Ex -officio to Board of County Commissi�nere''.�%i°':,`,E_, By: Karen Schoch,:-.'.'' choch, Deputy Clet$"', 148 1 APPENDIX B 2.1 cf) Ld 0 n 00 .-A Z Li 0 > u Ltj 0 CD 1117 CY — I W u) I --- 111u) tUx —j Lai 0 ii LLJ Cl - CL 1 4 B APPENDIX C 148 .. ii ...._ z..�.....rae �... r�o r{o. fsSY•6: o�'ii.Y yl Tiles � .- L ED -Ila w 0 m 'om n r r 5 < � � z _V() o a, 5 0 �, r � G7 Cei N 3 tsU Ln 9. *C:L 7' non CZ 1w 1 ------- --- . ........ . Ste. ------------------------ - ------- - ---------------------------------------------- ---------------------- -2 I n 1 1a S �ir r ; 14B ag LAI �� A O G r s n ` CL CL t � IN �kE g��R D ID � 14B 1 APPENDIX D 14B 1 APPENDIX D- Gateway Triangle Stormwater Master Plan - 2000 GATEWAY TRIANGLE CONCEPTUAL STORMWATER MASTER PLAN TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM Section 3..0 Alternative No. 3A Alternative No. 3A is a variation of Alternative No. 3 'developed in 1998 for the Gateway Triangle Conceptual Stormwater Master Plan. Alternative No. 3A is based on the future land uses established in the new Bayshore and Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Plan. Alternative No. 3A also includes projects that are currently under design to address existing problem areas. For areas undergoing complete redevelopment, permitting will require provision of an onsite Stormwatermanagement system to attenuate the 25 -year, 3 -day storm event. In addition, water quality improvements are required. The developer of the redevelopment areas will be required to construct a stormwater management system. Thus, improvements by the County are not required for the areas that will be completely redeveloped, Areas that are assumed to have: new stormwater management system built as part of redevelopment are described below. ■ The area west of Commercial Drive defined by US -41 and Davis Boulevard is designated a moderate activity center which includes a hotel, restaurants, offices and other commercial uses. Complete redevelopment of this 14.8 -acre area is assumed. ■ The area bounded by Davis Boulevard, Commercial Drive, US -41 and the Linwood Outfall Ditch is designated office/warehouse. This 25 -acre area could either undergo complete redevelopment or existing users may remain in upgraded facilities, improvements for this area will be identified for the case bf upgrading existing facilities instead of complete redevelopment. The Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Plan identified two potential stornxwater pond sites in the redevelopment areas• The ponds are located at the westernmost point of the Gateway Triangle adjacent to US -41 and Davis Boulevard and betweeii Linwood Avenue and Francis Avenue west of the Linwood outfall Ditch. Actual stormwater pond locations will be determined during the design phase of the redevelopment, The Gateway Triangle east of the 'Linwood Outfall Ditch is projected to undergo restructured development. Restructured development does not include complete redevelopment. Thus, developers will not be required to provide comprehensive stormwater management systems, Redevelopment provides the opportunity to create detention areas and regrada the site to improve drainage conditions. Restructured development does not create open areas for stormwater detention nor does it allow for elevating structures. Restructured development limits storruwater management improvements to providing detention in open areas and working within the existing topographical constraints, Stormwater management improvements in the restructured development areas will be made to address existing drainage problem areas, The drainage problem areas in the restructured 1 development area are listed below, 4WNorY� 4193 2/ 166.RT,wzp 3-1 14B 1 Gatewav Triangle Conceptual Stormwater Master Plant Technical Memorandum ■ Kirkwood Avenue — Only if the area does not undergo complete redevelopment. Property fronting Davis Boulevard north of 'Wild Pines Apartments. a The Linwood Outfall Ditch, especially property on Manorca Drive adjacent to the ditch. Pelton Avenue at the intersection with US -41. In addition to the improvements recommended to address problem areas, additional maintenance and rehabilitation of the existing starmwater management system- is recommended for the restructured development area. Additional maintenance will restore the hydraulic capacity of the stormwater management system. Additional hydraulic capacity will decrease the duration of flooding since_ the water can be co4veyed more quickly .through the system, Rehabilitation only will not significantly decrease the frequency of flooding, except perhaps in cases where flooding is minor and caused by a clogged catch basin, pipe or Swale. Additional maintenance and rehabilitation will allow the existing system to operate at its maximum capacity, which will provide the highest level of service for the existing system. The specific maintenance activities are provided below. 1. Reg_rade swales every two years — 36,000 • feet per year including the area between Comr6ercial Drive and the Linwood Outfall Ditch; 31,500 feet per year excluding the area between Commercial Drive and the Linwood Outfall Ditch, 2, Mow and clean swales once per month — 36,000 feet per year including the area between Commercial Drive and the Linwood Outfall Ditch; 31,500 feet per year excluding the area between Commercial Drive and the Linwood Outfall Ditch. 3, Clean Zlipes and catch basins one additional time ner Year -- 75 catch basins including the area between Commercial Drive and the Linwood Outfall Ditch; 55 catch basins excluding the area between Commercial Drive and the Linwood Outfall Ditch. The Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Study includes identification of one site for storrawater retention within the Shadowlawn Neighborhood Focus Initiative, This site is the property recently acquired by the County for use as a stormwater detention site. The project has been named Pond 2A. A piping network will convey the runoff. to Pond 2A, an approximate 2.5 -acre proposed stormwater detention pond located adjacent to the Linwood Outfall Ditch. 'Discharge from the pond will be through an overflow structure into the Linwood Outfall Ditch. During low flow conditions stormwater will be routed to the detention pond. Piping is provided for higher flow conditions to discharge into the storm sewer on Commercial Drive. The County has purchased the detention pond site and the project is under desigir. This project includes 13 catch basins, 1950 linear feet (If) of 24" RCP and 450 if of 18" RCP. The project includes construction of the Pond 2.A, detention pond and improvements to the Linwood Outfall Ditch. Kirkwood Avenue west of Avondale Drive is a major problem drainage area. A stornawater management system including additional catch basins and piping connected to a detention pond are recommended to improve drainage conditions in this area. Nine catch basins are proposed to collect runoff. Storm drains Iwial include approximately 1100 If of 15" RCP, 450 if of 18" RCP and 350 if of 24" RCP. These quantities do not include catch basins and'storm sewers that are included in,the Kirkwood Extension project. L LK(WOR vaa9s.seiss Rt.wer 3-2 14B 1 Gatawt v Triangle Conceptual Stormwater Master Plan Technical .Mfeinorandurn Parcels that -front on Davis Boulevard north of Wild Pines Apartments have drainage problems, especially at Naples Rent -All, The northern half of the parcels drain to Davis Boulevard while the southern half originally drained to the Linwood Outfall Ditch via overland'flow, The Wild Pines Apartments were constructed with a perimeter berm.. This berm impedes the southerly overland flow from the parcels fronting on Davis Boulevard. An extension of the catch basin and storm sewer system on Kirkwood Avenue, is recommended to address this problem area. The Kirkwood Extension project will require 5 catch basins, 4 manholes, 125 if of 15" RCP, 166 if of 18" RCP and 411 if of 24" RCP. Drainage easements are required for this project, This project has been designed and should be bid by May 2000. Pelton Avenue is another drainage problem area, specifically near the intersection of US -41. A system of catch basins and .pipes is recommended to address problems in the area by diverting a significant pari of the basin drainage away from the Pelton Street/US-41 intersection into an existing drainage ditch that connects to the US -41 system. This project requires 12 catch basins and approximately 1500 feet of piping ranging in diameter from 15" to 24". Improvements may be needed in -thr, existing drainage ditch. Drainage problems are reported along the Linwood Outfall Ditch. A particular problem area is a lowlying home on the west end of Manorea Drive. Improvements to address this problem include expanding the Linwood Outfall Ditch. Widening of the ditch will provide greater storage volume. In addition, bern-ing the ditch may help alleviate flooding on Manorca Drive. Figure 2 shows the proposed improvements. Table I provides a conceptual capital cost estimate. Table 2 provides a conceptual O&M cost estimate. LKlWOAK/629S-1i 16sAT.RE! 3^3 TABLE I ALTERNATWE NO. 3A CONCEPtUAL CAPITAL COST ES`><'XMATEt Project Estimated Construction Cost (S) Estimated Project Cast (S) Detention pond 2A and Piping 410,300 535,000 Kirkwood Avenue (West of Avondale) 144,400 190,000 Kirkwood Avenue Extension 78,0004 89,800' Pelton Avenue 122,700 160,000 Linwood Outfall Ditch 49,800 65,000 TOTAL 805,200 1,039,800 Notes: Property costs are mot included. 2 Itemized construction cost estimate is provided in the appendix. 3 Estimated project costs includes 15% contingency, 12% engineering and 3% admin. 4 Detailed construction cost estimate based on design drawings is included in. appendix. 5 Estimated project cost includes estimated construction cost and actaal engineering cost. 3-4 14B 1 TABLE 2 A-LTERNANIVE NO. 3A CONCEPTTJA.L O&M COST ESTIMATE i L W WOAlU6295 a 116b•R't.pPk Gateway Triangle Gateway Triangle' East of Commercial Drive East of Linwood Cost (S) Outfall Ditch Cost (�) Regrade 9wales First twa years • 84,000 73,500 Subsequent years 21,000 18,500 Mow & Clean Swaies 18,000 15,500 Clean Pipes & Catch Basins, 17,000 12,500 TOTAL ANNUAL COST First two years 115,000 101,500 Subsequent years 56,000 46;500 3-5 APPENDIX D Table 1 Detailed Cost Estimate - Alternative 3A Pelton Ave. Rounded 24" RCP Unit Construction Project Project Description Quantity Units Cost ($) Cost ($) Cost ($) Cost($) Kirkwood Ave. (West of Avondale) 37,500 15" RCP 600 24" RCP 350 If 90 31,500 Catch Basins 18" RCP 450 if 75 33,750 15" RCP 1100 If 65 71,500 122,700 Manholes 0 as 2000 0 Catch Basins 9 as 850 7,650 cy Subtotal 49,800 64,740 65,000 144,400 187,720 190,000 24" RCP' Pelton Ave. 24" RCP 400 if 90 36,000 18" RCP 500 If 75 37,500 15" RCP 600 If 65 39,600 Catch Basins 12 as 850 10,200 subtotal 122,700 159,510 160,000 Linwood Outfail Ditch " Excavation 4150 cy 12 49,800 64,740 65,000 Detention Pond 2A and Piping 24" RCP' 1950 If 90 175,500 18" RCP 450 If 75 33,750 Manholes 1 as 2000 2,000 Catch Basins 13 ea '850 11,050 Excavation - Pond 13,000 cy 12 156,000 Excavatlon - Ditch 2,500 cy 12 30,000 Discharge Structure 1 ea 2000 2,000 Subtotal 410,300 533,390 535,000 GRAND TOTAL, 950,000 " Refer to project cost estimate " Based on 650 ft ditch excavated 5 ft deep with 35 ft width Kirkwood Avenue Extension Drainage improvement Project opinion of Probable Construction Cost Unit item Unit Price Quantity ' Cost Standard Manhole, Type P»8 ea 1960 4 _ 7840 Catch Basins Index 233 (Type G) ea 3400 4 13600 Index 232 (Type D) ea 1725 2 3450 15" RCP if 37.5 128 4800 18" RCP if 45 168 7470 24" RCP if 60 411 24660 24" Snout ea 300 6 1800 Concrete Cradle ea 200 3 600 Roadway Resturation asphalt sy 5 327 1635 Urnerock base course sy 6.5 327 2126 Asphalt overlay sy 3 _ 654 1962 Sodding sy 1.25 ,250. 313 Seeding sf 0.12 820 96 Connection to existing pipe ea 200 1 200 Mobil., Demob., Bonds, etc. Is 3700 1 3700 Subtotal 74253 Contingency Q 5% 3713 i - TOTAL 77966 0 o10 �I dnfj>uv�y� Ur uc�s OZ'OZ X7l UO/B'L/t0 1613 \lHad3��dOt\9919L\SaL9\n q :p3 Q C �� v CL d Q LL. J � Y! �I dnfj>uv�y� Ur uc�s OZ'OZ X7l UO/B'L/t0 1613 \lHad3��dOt\9919L\SaL9\n q :p3 Q C �� v CL d Q LL. 148 i APPENDIX E A- LU D LQ z ^W O J W W r') LIJ LL 0 W C<� I C CO W Q W 0 W 0 coQ Ui�! �IIII � W1 �J CI VI, O'� M r�- Y {(t��•jjjll (,;{ N�I 1'1 .•1 = 1 I. i -1 I 11 t I N P ' N Y W t• �-i Y� Y W N st � � •'t i nnm"JJ'I' j �((( t� Iif f I I i ' 1 � 1 Ii1 n QiJ at111 MII U ml '�t t`71 1 � b N 8 g g g pp iV. r cry Ii t t i l fill F Jan i. CK I M .+ N M YIN m hl 4� rl•.N- � r wlt ' 1 "i �I � n �I Q� �I tli � �� I � N V ❑I � � fV7 Pi NJ rn��m �ito1 cvl.-ivll ._�f0 �� q�I DI ,^p(R�]I N• � (O N � � �I � , I ,• �� I 1^I (V� O 1 21S 8S m ofJ. ^ F d bj ril V TT 3 / t 1 ! I 1•I' � ��.(� � DI � � �I c�J� �{ lI Y p W N� VN �....i_ ( .fes, .+—i ^I In� t0 i m I n m "1 L 1 i l U i l I I { 1..1 Z W, � � z• SII VI ..l a cn �; 6 .. A • {{t � �jj mll olii � #3� � � � � I' al gl to �j gtj Q� Wj ��5111 =f rr��ri �r�vjiJ�; 8� -- L} n{11 til I . g I t Y . i A ♦ ry n e7 � � � , i I I I i 1 a i � 1 I APPENDIX F T46S I T47S I T48S 14B 1 T50S I T61 I T52S I T53S s§ g;j 3 ((I ff i(3j$�#5 $ 3 3 p$ ff ffi <gH wsz Snu„=°R `R�'asg$� s w J L� !'I��;4JL1® �®� ¢ � � � U a � � a�8a�b� �a8 �°� �g�gag�a8a�g °�a,a a a w w w w w w 5 w w w Ila An u 0 11 30 1 LU s 3 � � 7 w HO w I Eom I H �( / 2P1 [:rcativitv in Bloom IMMOKALEE } C /� CoMer County Communily N Redevelopment Agency i w COLLIER COUNTY COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT Collier County Board of County Commissioners Workshop April 23, 2019 A Tindale K�Oliver d e s i g n 1 CAO OPINION At the 4/9 BCC meeting, the Board asked if the Immokolee CRA could be extended without extending the life of the Boyshore Gateway Triangle CRA. On 4/12, the CAO issued an opinion that stated the following: • Once established a CRA continues until terminated by the local government that created it. • In order to finance redevelopment projects using TIF, the CRA must establish a Redevelopment plan, which can be amended any time the Board sees fit. • When amended, the TIF can be extended for up to 30 years (or any other period of time), but can exist no more than 60 years in aggregate. • Barring outside financing obligations, the Board can cease to use TIF for projects at anytime in the Bayshore CRA, while continuing to do so in Immokalee. • If the Board chooses a different duration in TIF for Bayshore, the redevelopment plan update may need to be amended. IMMOKALEE C Collier County Community �V� Redevelopment Agency Crea.. in Bloom 2 CRA EXTENSION OPTIONS • Original CRA Redevelopment Plan was approved in 2000 to expend TIF for 30 years — approximately 11 years remain. • Today, the Board needs to provide direction on duration of the TIF for the Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA and has 3 options: • OPTION 1: Approve the Bayshore plan update and extend the TIF duration for 30 years. • OPTION 2: Approve the Bayshore plan update, but direct staff to amend the project list for another duration of TIF project financing. • OPTION 3: Reject the Bayshore plan update, and continue with the contents of the 2000 plan. • Staff is seeking direction from the Board on TIF duration prior to undertaking the FY20 Immokalee Redevelopment Plan update. Crea... in Bloom TIF REVENUE PROJECTIONS TIF Revenue • Initial TIF funding occurred FY01 —through 2019: • Bayshore: $22,631,017 • Immokalee: $8,659,135 $154,400,000 • Est. TIF remaining in 11 year current term: • Bayshore: $ $46,200,000 • Immokalee:10 410 043 �� $ Immokalee Bayshore 0 2000-2019 0 2019-2049 (est.) • Est. TIF if extended for the proposed 30 year term (2019-2049): • Bayshore: $154,400,000 - $183,600,000 • Immokalee: $46,200,,000 - $54,400,000 3 ? ze" o Creaticitp in Bloom TOPIC: CRA OFFICE SPACE March 12 — CRAB terminated proposed leased space at Pineland Ave — directed staff to look into options on Gov Center campus Several commercial properties are available to meet the needs of BGTCRA Staff working with Facilities to identify possibilities for on -campus move, limited space currently available • BGTCRA Advisory Board made motion at 4/9 meeting to support locating the CRA offices off of Government Center campus • Long-term plan is to try and locate office space on County -owned 17 Acre site when future direction is decided no ?ze" Creaticitp in Bloom 1 4. &PIC: 17 ACRES r Aj -may' fi t sfiA• a yyr%•. r is. ' t. r Legend a ,c 17 ?.cre Site a Ovements 7 z 7 VillageC3 CR.-. Boundry.oned as the Cultural Arts Parks 7-k'DJIN*Fgtio .)Volvo' r rIr ft. NONE --;4 u�A4.4tIR11- IM 0 ilf 2 StillN _ stir rr�(f,Fr ,n [.Itg �: V?a •.;y '�'is� 1'M, i Non-residential uses, performing f- • - i arts I theater use, mixed use commercialune l _ t residential if residential is included. 1 tray Shared parking opportunity. j 2018: termination of negotiations •rno directed CRA to wait until Y f �� �s>� �..„.. �. • r ■ �IIa�Ir.a�a��° " ■ kedevelopment Plan pdI_ o further l ��� � e1fR19RAlIr^•Illw� q1 p- ■ ■ Sugden �l01� , �rx_3 n1 �Fl� 9+■, Regional �' ► Park !L, , .. _, _� "'•� :�-;'�" JEEPERS'�R.r�:Y �;i � '�.��� w -ILII - a ■, _ _ "' • survey conducted . • . • , -F _I 7 m ■ mmunity Walk bike connections and potential • _ h -� ! ■ shared use between Sugden RegiOnel 4" i' ., '"rte"'• ■ �_,:„ Park and 17AcreSite. Cordinate with } '� i L[-'""'�r"' 1G ■ �;k any CRA boundary expansion east. OMQS_5.ON:DR Z r. _ �■ Entryway Aultiple parties interested. Roundabout r Intersection Design - .. • ,ment - Seeking BCC direction on YNaples Botanical" novin• Garden F F. ■ East Naples , I 'A - forwI N1 Community �� rn Park y Md r 1, 000� 17 -ACRE SURVEY RESULTS • Cultural arts center and park connections important • Focus on performance arts, theater, gallery R 0' - P ease rank your priorities for the community? 5.69 5.93 4.1 a 4.29 4.62 2.79 2.94 = = M M Cultural Center Connection to Mixed Commercial (e.g. Studio Space Cortdwiriums Fberdal S *en Park CommercioMPxsi F dwI and Residential (e.g. dentia) _.. Restaurant) Apartments, .- Q2 -1 hat does a cultural canter mean to you'?( elect all that apply) - SeJected Choice % Civic Genter ■Th-eater[4136] ■ArtGallery[422] ■PerbrmingArts [554] ■EducatarVLibraryrPZ4] ChAcCenlerL206] ■Museump4l] ■Other[64] 2?9�.4 2Bl Crcaucity in Bloom 17 -ACRE SURVEY RESULTS • Achieving vision important • Interest in TIF, Impact fee, and land donation incentives 7 0 - On a scale of 0-10, please rate the importance of selling the parcel at the highest negotiated price versus the use of the space, Vision Use AF7.07r Price 912.77 1 D C, 1 D 04 - 4n a scale of 0-10, how willing are you to allow the CFA to provide fundslincentives to ensure preferred use? Tax Increment Funds Impact Fees Free Land/Dictate what occurs with land 0 1a 5.92 0 't x.64 1a U 10 ! Vf i p s y tCRE CONCEPT yin _� sri}• �•� r �•. 1i 7� 4L� ' tw "f Legend a ,c 17 ?.cre Site A., 7 GR- Boundry con Parks nectivity '.��'� �.�UttgacrF:F4�.ut#*I�1�� r 1000 ft 2000 ft. j MEMEt 64"t "YVr'��A�■w - - �4 u1A4.411R4., dIiMN 16 _ • space , i Non-residential uses, performing rr+rle.rr n[ Itg rt Vt7� ,ti �s _ arts I theater use, mixed use commercial lhar/usel • 1 residential if residential is included. 1 } • • boundary expansion t I, k Shared parking opportunity. performance theater �IIIIII.aaa��° � ■ �' gallery � r;n � e1FiRlgrAllr^•Illw ■ iY � ■ i - e s i IEE � .tom 1If11 �'�b ■ H • � n t a I /m i � • - u s � focus IM—M.1 Q c Sugdeni n141: PIT 19+■, Regional �'- ► Park ' !L _ JEEPERS'DR.1,'Jng: on -street and garage option r� lete Streets/trail site • connectivity� _ �I ■' Walk bike connections and potential m ■ shared use between Sugden Reg iOnal-�- i' -�, ., '"rte"'' ■ Park and 17AcreSite. Cordinate with } 1 -� '� 'i L[-'""'�r"' 1G ■ any CRA boundary expansion east. -� ,ntiv; _jHOMAS_S_ON:DR Z r. �■ l�Entryway Roundabout r Intersection Design rnpact fee deferment/buy-down BoNaples,,, tan -and donation ` Garden F F. ■ East Naples , I { r, Community Park, IF ■ 4 a ■ T —_J illi'/ 000 � Y x � . '9:l- TOPIC: 17 -ACRES • F.S. 163, Section III outlines ways to dispose of CRA -owned land • CRA Advisory Board recommends reserving the property for a performing arts center with CAPA and dedicating remainder to green space • Staff has had discussions with Parks Department on combination of options to purchase/improve land - idea needs refinement • FGCU has a proposal for a research center combined with private development • Multiple private companies would be interested in proposa 9 ?ze" Creaticitp in Bloom r_ C7 m 0 W En m v' cn z c„ o mz cnm cn 0 z 00 zm >� O O cu �m n D �O czXG')C: O� x O p mcn ;um T T 0 �o cnK 00 co r -z „ o O Fr O n --I C7 00 z� �z co cn mm cnD ;%�m m;d cn o= j O M z G) m0 M -uz D D c� �m z G) CD rp N CD o W� c °c o D Z -� M n r° r -a o <� O Z COD T �' z n v zm �z p co � N _ G) o w -co cn M c --.P M -i A W o�0> E rn O ZO m C moo m=o-< -n DoD x 000 O >0 2 omz � K c) C) � � �o 0 cf)mC) cri Q z co �ODz 0 moo Z o 0 cn 0 :'�' ZMzM � KT -co ZED O cn -1 a D Z �r v r- v �O U3 M m-< cn G) c O �v —I = M M m x M C7 rn- m a X G) D 0 z I O 2 — mz wi M ic J Cl M n CD CL 13) O o CD � W 0 3 = --- CD vo O 0 -0 n• 1481 r C7 m 0 r m v T O Z m r m. O S m r m -n -I O m v cn i -o r m m Z —I Cl) r m r -D C: r C) mo co cn Z E Z U)z cn O -� mz m� U)m 0 z 00 z D 0 r O O CA �m -n � z0 -) C oi-- O 0 2 'n mcn X Orn 0 CA O 00 -n -i co M T z v o� 0 C) ::� 0 00 Z - m z CO m m D D �� mm 0;d cn i::E o= r- 0 �m M -� m i o I � CD < N m O 00 70 rt C �o a zc X �� rt r --� O <0 O Fn D CD m Z v nm z O oO --� z CO cWn m cW M D z Cf) W m O D OD r Z Z�m m =oma Cl) M- O pc D O O D z pmz �KCnm Ozz �ci�o C7Cf) m� Ul OzQ'D 0�z 0 moo m� Z 00a cn o o p a0c� Z mzm � �Kcn mZK-j -a -i U D O > D a Zr- 0 p 0 M m G) Cn O m= m Z �r z � �W M mx Cn n rn- m D G) D O z -I O mz r, CD iw CD U3 v CD N N n CD CL 2) CD a o CD :3a c 0 0 3�E. 3m CD 1481 a n m 0 r m v O z —1 m a OD r m. O 2 m r m -n -I O m v i -o r m N m -o Z —I n r m a -D c r C) m0 C cn z Z v, mz cno cn 0 mz Nm O z z 0 Dm r O O W �m C7 D O z� 0c 0� 00 mCn ;um OT 0 cn O 0Ti 0 Cno M n G O COr o :-j0 O O z� m Z mm CD ;r,� Mm o� o= ern O mm G7 mm z go c m z 0 X CD < 0 N O M 7u C <00 a M n � O_*. r -1O < O MD CCD m v' z v nm z O co o' o �cio cn m -4n z cn C4 oo0D E: Z0�0 m Coo m=oma U) M- O -npo; O DOZ 70oMZ�, �jiC-) O22m C --I oCl) mo O ZooD ooz 0 moo Z0oa CDoo� Z mzmm � � C vD ���cn M z�= -� -� c D O oD a mr- 0p �03 cn G� O m D Z -<00 M ---I -n M m x m 0 rn- m = m a �> D 0O z = G� mz N n CL 0) r*` CD 3 Z O T v1i o crv � c 0 0 � e -f m CD rt U o O 148 Z